id
stringlengths 15
18
| query
stringlengths 1.28k
9.7k
| answer
stringlengths 2
14
|
|---|---|---|
CONVFINQA_test500 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
settlements , and the expiration of statutes of limi- tation , the company currently estimates that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits could be reduced by up to $ 365 million during the next twelve months , with no significant impact on earnings or cash tax payments . while the company believes that it is adequately accrued for possible audit adjust- ments , the final resolution of these examinations cannot be determined at this time and could result in final settlements that differ from current estimates . the company recorded an income tax provision for 2007 of $ 415 million , including a $ 41 million benefit related to the effective settlement of tax audits , and $ 8 million of other tax benefits . excluding the impact of special items , the tax provision was $ 423 million , or 30% ( 30 % ) of pre-tax earnings before minority interest . the company recorded an income tax provision for 2006 of $ 1.9 billion , consisting of a $ 1.6 billion deferred tax provision ( principally reflecting deferred taxes on the 2006 transformation plan forestland sales ) and a $ 300 million current tax provision . the provision also includes an $ 11 million provision related to a special tax adjustment . excluding the impact of special items , the tax provision was $ 272 million , or 29% ( 29 % ) of pre-tax earnings before minority interest . the company recorded an income tax benefit for 2005 of $ 407 million , including a $ 454 million net tax benefit related to a special tax adjustment , consisting of a tax benefit of $ 627 million resulting from an agreement reached with the u.s . internal revenue service concerning the 1997 through 2000 u.s . federal income tax audit , a $ 142 million charge for deferred taxes related to earnings repatriations under the american jobs creation act of 2004 , and $ 31 million of other tax charges . excluding the impact of special items , the tax provision was $ 83 million , or 20% ( 20 % ) of pre-tax earnings before minority interest . international paper has non-u.s . net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $ 352 million that expire as follows : 2008 through 2017 2014 $ 14 million and indefinite carryforwards of $ 338 million . interna- tional paper has tax benefits from net operating loss carryforwards for state taxing jurisdictions of approximately $ 258 million that expire as follows : 2008 through 2017 2014$ 83 million and 2018 through 2027 2014$ 175 million . international paper also has federal , non-u.s . and state tax credit carryforwards that expire as follows : 2008 through 2017 2014 $ 67 million , 2018 through 2027 2014 $ 92 million , and indefinite carryforwards 2014 $ 316 million . further , international paper has state capital loss carryfor- wards that expire as follows : 2008 through 2017 2014 $ 9 million . deferred income taxes are not provided for tempo- rary differences of approximately $ 3.7 billion , $ 2.7 billion and $ 2.4 billion as of december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively , representing earnings of non-u.s . subsidiaries intended to be permanently reinvested . computation of the potential deferred tax liability associated with these undistributed earnings and other basis differences is not practicable . note 10 commitments and contingent liabilities certain property , machinery and equipment are leased under cancelable and non-cancelable agree- ments . unconditional purchase obligations have been entered into in the ordinary course of business , prin- cipally for capital projects and the purchase of cer- tain pulpwood , wood chips , raw materials , energy and services , including fiber supply agreements to purchase pulpwood that were entered into con- currently with the 2006 transformation plan forest- land sales ( see note 7 ) . at december 31 , 2007 , total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operat- ing leases and purchase obligations were as follows : in millions 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 thereafter . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2008</td><td>2009</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>lease obligations</td><td>$ 136</td><td>$ 116</td><td>$ 101</td><td>$ 84</td><td>$ 67</td><td>$ 92</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>purchase obligations ( a )</td><td>1953</td><td>294</td><td>261</td><td>235</td><td>212</td><td>1480</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 2089</td><td>$ 410</td><td>$ 362</td><td>$ 319</td><td>$ 279</td><td>$ 1572</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes $ 2.1 billion relating to fiber supply agreements entered into at the time of the transformation plan forestland sales . rent expense was $ 168 million , $ 217 million and $ 216 million for 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . international paper entered into an agreement in 2000 to guarantee , for a fee , an unsecured con- tractual credit agreement between a financial institution and an unrelated third-party customer . in the fourth quarter of 2006 , the customer cancelled the agreement and paid the company a fee of $ 11 million , which is included in cost of products sold in the accompanying consolidated statement of oper- ations . the company has no future obligations under this agreement. .
Question: as of december 31, 2007, what was the amount of the purchase obligations due in 2008?
| 1953.0 |
CONVFINQA_test501 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
settlements , and the expiration of statutes of limi- tation , the company currently estimates that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits could be reduced by up to $ 365 million during the next twelve months , with no significant impact on earnings or cash tax payments . while the company believes that it is adequately accrued for possible audit adjust- ments , the final resolution of these examinations cannot be determined at this time and could result in final settlements that differ from current estimates . the company recorded an income tax provision for 2007 of $ 415 million , including a $ 41 million benefit related to the effective settlement of tax audits , and $ 8 million of other tax benefits . excluding the impact of special items , the tax provision was $ 423 million , or 30% ( 30 % ) of pre-tax earnings before minority interest . the company recorded an income tax provision for 2006 of $ 1.9 billion , consisting of a $ 1.6 billion deferred tax provision ( principally reflecting deferred taxes on the 2006 transformation plan forestland sales ) and a $ 300 million current tax provision . the provision also includes an $ 11 million provision related to a special tax adjustment . excluding the impact of special items , the tax provision was $ 272 million , or 29% ( 29 % ) of pre-tax earnings before minority interest . the company recorded an income tax benefit for 2005 of $ 407 million , including a $ 454 million net tax benefit related to a special tax adjustment , consisting of a tax benefit of $ 627 million resulting from an agreement reached with the u.s . internal revenue service concerning the 1997 through 2000 u.s . federal income tax audit , a $ 142 million charge for deferred taxes related to earnings repatriations under the american jobs creation act of 2004 , and $ 31 million of other tax charges . excluding the impact of special items , the tax provision was $ 83 million , or 20% ( 20 % ) of pre-tax earnings before minority interest . international paper has non-u.s . net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $ 352 million that expire as follows : 2008 through 2017 2014 $ 14 million and indefinite carryforwards of $ 338 million . interna- tional paper has tax benefits from net operating loss carryforwards for state taxing jurisdictions of approximately $ 258 million that expire as follows : 2008 through 2017 2014$ 83 million and 2018 through 2027 2014$ 175 million . international paper also has federal , non-u.s . and state tax credit carryforwards that expire as follows : 2008 through 2017 2014 $ 67 million , 2018 through 2027 2014 $ 92 million , and indefinite carryforwards 2014 $ 316 million . further , international paper has state capital loss carryfor- wards that expire as follows : 2008 through 2017 2014 $ 9 million . deferred income taxes are not provided for tempo- rary differences of approximately $ 3.7 billion , $ 2.7 billion and $ 2.4 billion as of december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively , representing earnings of non-u.s . subsidiaries intended to be permanently reinvested . computation of the potential deferred tax liability associated with these undistributed earnings and other basis differences is not practicable . note 10 commitments and contingent liabilities certain property , machinery and equipment are leased under cancelable and non-cancelable agree- ments . unconditional purchase obligations have been entered into in the ordinary course of business , prin- cipally for capital projects and the purchase of cer- tain pulpwood , wood chips , raw materials , energy and services , including fiber supply agreements to purchase pulpwood that were entered into con- currently with the 2006 transformation plan forest- land sales ( see note 7 ) . at december 31 , 2007 , total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operat- ing leases and purchase obligations were as follows : in millions 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 thereafter . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2008</td><td>2009</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>lease obligations</td><td>$ 136</td><td>$ 116</td><td>$ 101</td><td>$ 84</td><td>$ 67</td><td>$ 92</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>purchase obligations ( a )</td><td>1953</td><td>294</td><td>261</td><td>235</td><td>212</td><td>1480</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 2089</td><td>$ 410</td><td>$ 362</td><td>$ 319</td><td>$ 279</td><td>$ 1572</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes $ 2.1 billion relating to fiber supply agreements entered into at the time of the transformation plan forestland sales . rent expense was $ 168 million , $ 217 million and $ 216 million for 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . international paper entered into an agreement in 2000 to guarantee , for a fee , an unsecured con- tractual credit agreement between a financial institution and an unrelated third-party customer . in the fourth quarter of 2006 , the customer cancelled the agreement and paid the company a fee of $ 11 million , which is included in cost of products sold in the accompanying consolidated statement of oper- ations . the company has no future obligations under this agreement. .
Question: as of december 31, 2007, what was the amount of the purchase obligations due in 2008?
Answer: 1953.0
Question: and what was the total of all obligations?
| 2089.0 |
CONVFINQA_test502 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
settlements , and the expiration of statutes of limi- tation , the company currently estimates that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits could be reduced by up to $ 365 million during the next twelve months , with no significant impact on earnings or cash tax payments . while the company believes that it is adequately accrued for possible audit adjust- ments , the final resolution of these examinations cannot be determined at this time and could result in final settlements that differ from current estimates . the company recorded an income tax provision for 2007 of $ 415 million , including a $ 41 million benefit related to the effective settlement of tax audits , and $ 8 million of other tax benefits . excluding the impact of special items , the tax provision was $ 423 million , or 30% ( 30 % ) of pre-tax earnings before minority interest . the company recorded an income tax provision for 2006 of $ 1.9 billion , consisting of a $ 1.6 billion deferred tax provision ( principally reflecting deferred taxes on the 2006 transformation plan forestland sales ) and a $ 300 million current tax provision . the provision also includes an $ 11 million provision related to a special tax adjustment . excluding the impact of special items , the tax provision was $ 272 million , or 29% ( 29 % ) of pre-tax earnings before minority interest . the company recorded an income tax benefit for 2005 of $ 407 million , including a $ 454 million net tax benefit related to a special tax adjustment , consisting of a tax benefit of $ 627 million resulting from an agreement reached with the u.s . internal revenue service concerning the 1997 through 2000 u.s . federal income tax audit , a $ 142 million charge for deferred taxes related to earnings repatriations under the american jobs creation act of 2004 , and $ 31 million of other tax charges . excluding the impact of special items , the tax provision was $ 83 million , or 20% ( 20 % ) of pre-tax earnings before minority interest . international paper has non-u.s . net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $ 352 million that expire as follows : 2008 through 2017 2014 $ 14 million and indefinite carryforwards of $ 338 million . interna- tional paper has tax benefits from net operating loss carryforwards for state taxing jurisdictions of approximately $ 258 million that expire as follows : 2008 through 2017 2014$ 83 million and 2018 through 2027 2014$ 175 million . international paper also has federal , non-u.s . and state tax credit carryforwards that expire as follows : 2008 through 2017 2014 $ 67 million , 2018 through 2027 2014 $ 92 million , and indefinite carryforwards 2014 $ 316 million . further , international paper has state capital loss carryfor- wards that expire as follows : 2008 through 2017 2014 $ 9 million . deferred income taxes are not provided for tempo- rary differences of approximately $ 3.7 billion , $ 2.7 billion and $ 2.4 billion as of december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively , representing earnings of non-u.s . subsidiaries intended to be permanently reinvested . computation of the potential deferred tax liability associated with these undistributed earnings and other basis differences is not practicable . note 10 commitments and contingent liabilities certain property , machinery and equipment are leased under cancelable and non-cancelable agree- ments . unconditional purchase obligations have been entered into in the ordinary course of business , prin- cipally for capital projects and the purchase of cer- tain pulpwood , wood chips , raw materials , energy and services , including fiber supply agreements to purchase pulpwood that were entered into con- currently with the 2006 transformation plan forest- land sales ( see note 7 ) . at december 31 , 2007 , total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operat- ing leases and purchase obligations were as follows : in millions 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 thereafter . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2008</td><td>2009</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>lease obligations</td><td>$ 136</td><td>$ 116</td><td>$ 101</td><td>$ 84</td><td>$ 67</td><td>$ 92</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>purchase obligations ( a )</td><td>1953</td><td>294</td><td>261</td><td>235</td><td>212</td><td>1480</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 2089</td><td>$ 410</td><td>$ 362</td><td>$ 319</td><td>$ 279</td><td>$ 1572</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes $ 2.1 billion relating to fiber supply agreements entered into at the time of the transformation plan forestland sales . rent expense was $ 168 million , $ 217 million and $ 216 million for 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . international paper entered into an agreement in 2000 to guarantee , for a fee , an unsecured con- tractual credit agreement between a financial institution and an unrelated third-party customer . in the fourth quarter of 2006 , the customer cancelled the agreement and paid the company a fee of $ 11 million , which is included in cost of products sold in the accompanying consolidated statement of oper- ations . the company has no future obligations under this agreement. .
Question: as of december 31, 2007, what was the amount of the purchase obligations due in 2008?
Answer: 1953.0
Question: and what was the total of all obligations?
Answer: 2089.0
Question: what percentage, then, did that amount represent in relation to this total?
| 0.9349 |
CONVFINQA_test503 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
settlements , and the expiration of statutes of limi- tation , the company currently estimates that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits could be reduced by up to $ 365 million during the next twelve months , with no significant impact on earnings or cash tax payments . while the company believes that it is adequately accrued for possible audit adjust- ments , the final resolution of these examinations cannot be determined at this time and could result in final settlements that differ from current estimates . the company recorded an income tax provision for 2007 of $ 415 million , including a $ 41 million benefit related to the effective settlement of tax audits , and $ 8 million of other tax benefits . excluding the impact of special items , the tax provision was $ 423 million , or 30% ( 30 % ) of pre-tax earnings before minority interest . the company recorded an income tax provision for 2006 of $ 1.9 billion , consisting of a $ 1.6 billion deferred tax provision ( principally reflecting deferred taxes on the 2006 transformation plan forestland sales ) and a $ 300 million current tax provision . the provision also includes an $ 11 million provision related to a special tax adjustment . excluding the impact of special items , the tax provision was $ 272 million , or 29% ( 29 % ) of pre-tax earnings before minority interest . the company recorded an income tax benefit for 2005 of $ 407 million , including a $ 454 million net tax benefit related to a special tax adjustment , consisting of a tax benefit of $ 627 million resulting from an agreement reached with the u.s . internal revenue service concerning the 1997 through 2000 u.s . federal income tax audit , a $ 142 million charge for deferred taxes related to earnings repatriations under the american jobs creation act of 2004 , and $ 31 million of other tax charges . excluding the impact of special items , the tax provision was $ 83 million , or 20% ( 20 % ) of pre-tax earnings before minority interest . international paper has non-u.s . net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $ 352 million that expire as follows : 2008 through 2017 2014 $ 14 million and indefinite carryforwards of $ 338 million . interna- tional paper has tax benefits from net operating loss carryforwards for state taxing jurisdictions of approximately $ 258 million that expire as follows : 2008 through 2017 2014$ 83 million and 2018 through 2027 2014$ 175 million . international paper also has federal , non-u.s . and state tax credit carryforwards that expire as follows : 2008 through 2017 2014 $ 67 million , 2018 through 2027 2014 $ 92 million , and indefinite carryforwards 2014 $ 316 million . further , international paper has state capital loss carryfor- wards that expire as follows : 2008 through 2017 2014 $ 9 million . deferred income taxes are not provided for tempo- rary differences of approximately $ 3.7 billion , $ 2.7 billion and $ 2.4 billion as of december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively , representing earnings of non-u.s . subsidiaries intended to be permanently reinvested . computation of the potential deferred tax liability associated with these undistributed earnings and other basis differences is not practicable . note 10 commitments and contingent liabilities certain property , machinery and equipment are leased under cancelable and non-cancelable agree- ments . unconditional purchase obligations have been entered into in the ordinary course of business , prin- cipally for capital projects and the purchase of cer- tain pulpwood , wood chips , raw materials , energy and services , including fiber supply agreements to purchase pulpwood that were entered into con- currently with the 2006 transformation plan forest- land sales ( see note 7 ) . at december 31 , 2007 , total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operat- ing leases and purchase obligations were as follows : in millions 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 thereafter . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2008</td><td>2009</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>lease obligations</td><td>$ 136</td><td>$ 116</td><td>$ 101</td><td>$ 84</td><td>$ 67</td><td>$ 92</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>purchase obligations ( a )</td><td>1953</td><td>294</td><td>261</td><td>235</td><td>212</td><td>1480</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 2089</td><td>$ 410</td><td>$ 362</td><td>$ 319</td><td>$ 279</td><td>$ 1572</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes $ 2.1 billion relating to fiber supply agreements entered into at the time of the transformation plan forestland sales . rent expense was $ 168 million , $ 217 million and $ 216 million for 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . international paper entered into an agreement in 2000 to guarantee , for a fee , an unsecured con- tractual credit agreement between a financial institution and an unrelated third-party customer . in the fourth quarter of 2006 , the customer cancelled the agreement and paid the company a fee of $ 11 million , which is included in cost of products sold in the accompanying consolidated statement of oper- ations . the company has no future obligations under this agreement. .
Question: as of december 31, 2007, what was the amount of the purchase obligations due in 2008?
Answer: 1953.0
Question: and what was the total of all obligations?
Answer: 2089.0
Question: what percentage, then, did that amount represent in relation to this total?
Answer: 0.9349
Question: and what percentage did the lease obligations represent?
| 0.0651 |
CONVFINQA_test504 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part ii item 5 2014market for registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters market information . the common stock of the company is currently traded on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) under the symbol 2018 2018aes . 2019 2019 the following tables set forth the high and low sale prices for the common stock as reported by the nyse for the periods indicated . price range of common stock . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2002 first quarter</td><td>high $ 17.84</td><td>low $ 4.11</td><td>2001 first quarter</td><td>high $ 60.15</td><td>low $ 41.30</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>second quarter</td><td>9.17</td><td>3.55</td><td>second quarter</td><td>52.25</td><td>39.95</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>third quarter</td><td>4.61</td><td>1.56</td><td>third quarter</td><td>44.50</td><td>12.00</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fourth quarter</td><td>3.57</td><td>0.95</td><td>fourth quarter</td><td>17.80</td><td>11.60</td></tr></table> holders . as of march 3 , 2003 , there were 9663 record holders of the company 2019s common stock , par value $ 0.01 per share . dividends . under the terms of the company 2019s senior secured credit facilities entered into with a commercial bank syndicate , the company is not allowed to pay cash dividends . in addition , the company is precluded from paying cash dividends on its common stock under the terms of a guaranty to the utility customer in connection with the aes thames project in the event certain net worth and liquidity tests of the company are not met . the ability of the company 2019s project subsidiaries to declare and pay cash dividends to the company is subject to certain limitations in the project loans , governmental provisions and other agreements entered into by such project subsidiaries . securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans . see the information contained under the caption 2018 2018securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans 2019 2019 of the proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders of the registrant to be held on may 1 , 2003 , which information is incorporated herein by reference. .
Question: what was the variance in the price of common stock from low to high in the first quarter of 2002?
| 13.73 |
CONVFINQA_test505 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part ii item 5 2014market for registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters market information . the common stock of the company is currently traded on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) under the symbol 2018 2018aes . 2019 2019 the following tables set forth the high and low sale prices for the common stock as reported by the nyse for the periods indicated . price range of common stock . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2002 first quarter</td><td>high $ 17.84</td><td>low $ 4.11</td><td>2001 first quarter</td><td>high $ 60.15</td><td>low $ 41.30</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>second quarter</td><td>9.17</td><td>3.55</td><td>second quarter</td><td>52.25</td><td>39.95</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>third quarter</td><td>4.61</td><td>1.56</td><td>third quarter</td><td>44.50</td><td>12.00</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fourth quarter</td><td>3.57</td><td>0.95</td><td>fourth quarter</td><td>17.80</td><td>11.60</td></tr></table> holders . as of march 3 , 2003 , there were 9663 record holders of the company 2019s common stock , par value $ 0.01 per share . dividends . under the terms of the company 2019s senior secured credit facilities entered into with a commercial bank syndicate , the company is not allowed to pay cash dividends . in addition , the company is precluded from paying cash dividends on its common stock under the terms of a guaranty to the utility customer in connection with the aes thames project in the event certain net worth and liquidity tests of the company are not met . the ability of the company 2019s project subsidiaries to declare and pay cash dividends to the company is subject to certain limitations in the project loans , governmental provisions and other agreements entered into by such project subsidiaries . securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans . see the information contained under the caption 2018 2018securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans 2019 2019 of the proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders of the registrant to be held on may 1 , 2003 , which information is incorporated herein by reference. .
Question: what was the variance in the price of common stock from low to high in the first quarter of 2002?
Answer: 13.73
Question: what was the high price of common stock in the first quarter of 2001?
| 60.15 |
CONVFINQA_test506 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part ii item 5 2014market for registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters market information . the common stock of the company is currently traded on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) under the symbol 2018 2018aes . 2019 2019 the following tables set forth the high and low sale prices for the common stock as reported by the nyse for the periods indicated . price range of common stock . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2002 first quarter</td><td>high $ 17.84</td><td>low $ 4.11</td><td>2001 first quarter</td><td>high $ 60.15</td><td>low $ 41.30</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>second quarter</td><td>9.17</td><td>3.55</td><td>second quarter</td><td>52.25</td><td>39.95</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>third quarter</td><td>4.61</td><td>1.56</td><td>third quarter</td><td>44.50</td><td>12.00</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fourth quarter</td><td>3.57</td><td>0.95</td><td>fourth quarter</td><td>17.80</td><td>11.60</td></tr></table> holders . as of march 3 , 2003 , there were 9663 record holders of the company 2019s common stock , par value $ 0.01 per share . dividends . under the terms of the company 2019s senior secured credit facilities entered into with a commercial bank syndicate , the company is not allowed to pay cash dividends . in addition , the company is precluded from paying cash dividends on its common stock under the terms of a guaranty to the utility customer in connection with the aes thames project in the event certain net worth and liquidity tests of the company are not met . the ability of the company 2019s project subsidiaries to declare and pay cash dividends to the company is subject to certain limitations in the project loans , governmental provisions and other agreements entered into by such project subsidiaries . securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans . see the information contained under the caption 2018 2018securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans 2019 2019 of the proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders of the registrant to be held on may 1 , 2003 , which information is incorporated herein by reference. .
Question: what was the variance in the price of common stock from low to high in the first quarter of 2002?
Answer: 13.73
Question: what was the high price of common stock in the first quarter of 2001?
Answer: 60.15
Question: and what was the low price?
| 41.3 |
CONVFINQA_test507 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part ii item 5 2014market for registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters market information . the common stock of the company is currently traded on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) under the symbol 2018 2018aes . 2019 2019 the following tables set forth the high and low sale prices for the common stock as reported by the nyse for the periods indicated . price range of common stock . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2002 first quarter</td><td>high $ 17.84</td><td>low $ 4.11</td><td>2001 first quarter</td><td>high $ 60.15</td><td>low $ 41.30</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>second quarter</td><td>9.17</td><td>3.55</td><td>second quarter</td><td>52.25</td><td>39.95</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>third quarter</td><td>4.61</td><td>1.56</td><td>third quarter</td><td>44.50</td><td>12.00</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fourth quarter</td><td>3.57</td><td>0.95</td><td>fourth quarter</td><td>17.80</td><td>11.60</td></tr></table> holders . as of march 3 , 2003 , there were 9663 record holders of the company 2019s common stock , par value $ 0.01 per share . dividends . under the terms of the company 2019s senior secured credit facilities entered into with a commercial bank syndicate , the company is not allowed to pay cash dividends . in addition , the company is precluded from paying cash dividends on its common stock under the terms of a guaranty to the utility customer in connection with the aes thames project in the event certain net worth and liquidity tests of the company are not met . the ability of the company 2019s project subsidiaries to declare and pay cash dividends to the company is subject to certain limitations in the project loans , governmental provisions and other agreements entered into by such project subsidiaries . securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans . see the information contained under the caption 2018 2018securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans 2019 2019 of the proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders of the registrant to be held on may 1 , 2003 , which information is incorporated herein by reference. .
Question: what was the variance in the price of common stock from low to high in the first quarter of 2002?
Answer: 13.73
Question: what was the high price of common stock in the first quarter of 2001?
Answer: 60.15
Question: and what was the low price?
Answer: 41.3
Question: what was, then, the variance in that price from low to high?
| 18.85 |
CONVFINQA_test508 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part ii item 5 2014market for registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters market information . the common stock of the company is currently traded on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) under the symbol 2018 2018aes . 2019 2019 the following tables set forth the high and low sale prices for the common stock as reported by the nyse for the periods indicated . price range of common stock . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2002 first quarter</td><td>high $ 17.84</td><td>low $ 4.11</td><td>2001 first quarter</td><td>high $ 60.15</td><td>low $ 41.30</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>second quarter</td><td>9.17</td><td>3.55</td><td>second quarter</td><td>52.25</td><td>39.95</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>third quarter</td><td>4.61</td><td>1.56</td><td>third quarter</td><td>44.50</td><td>12.00</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fourth quarter</td><td>3.57</td><td>0.95</td><td>fourth quarter</td><td>17.80</td><td>11.60</td></tr></table> holders . as of march 3 , 2003 , there were 9663 record holders of the company 2019s common stock , par value $ 0.01 per share . dividends . under the terms of the company 2019s senior secured credit facilities entered into with a commercial bank syndicate , the company is not allowed to pay cash dividends . in addition , the company is precluded from paying cash dividends on its common stock under the terms of a guaranty to the utility customer in connection with the aes thames project in the event certain net worth and liquidity tests of the company are not met . the ability of the company 2019s project subsidiaries to declare and pay cash dividends to the company is subject to certain limitations in the project loans , governmental provisions and other agreements entered into by such project subsidiaries . securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans . see the information contained under the caption 2018 2018securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans 2019 2019 of the proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders of the registrant to be held on may 1 , 2003 , which information is incorporated herein by reference. .
Question: what was the variance in the price of common stock from low to high in the first quarter of 2002?
Answer: 13.73
Question: what was the high price of common stock in the first quarter of 2001?
Answer: 60.15
Question: and what was the low price?
Answer: 41.3
Question: what was, then, the variance in that price from low to high?
Answer: 18.85
Question: which one is greater: the variance of the price in the first quarter of 2002 or in the first quarter of 2001?
| no |
CONVFINQA_test509 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the defined benefit pension plans 2019 trust and $ 130 million to our retiree medical plans which will reduce our cash funding requirements for 2007 and 2008 . in 2007 , we expect to make no contributions to the defined benefit pension plans and expect to contribute $ 175 million to the retiree medical and life insurance plans , after giving consideration to the 2006 prepayments . the following benefit payments , which reflect expected future service , as appropriate , are expected to be paid : ( in millions ) pension benefits benefits . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>pensionbenefits</td><td>otherbenefits</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007</td><td>$ 1440</td><td>$ 260</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2008</td><td>1490</td><td>260</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>1540</td><td>270</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010</td><td>1600</td><td>270</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>1660</td><td>270</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>years 2012 2013 2016</td><td>9530</td><td>1260</td></tr></table> as noted previously , we also sponsor nonqualified defined benefit plans to provide benefits in excess of qualified plan limits . the aggregate liabilities for these plans at december 31 , 2006 were $ 641 million . the expense associated with these plans totaled $ 59 million in 2006 , $ 58 million in 2005 and $ 61 million in 2004 . we also sponsor a small number of foreign benefit plans . the liabilities and expenses associated with these plans are not material to our results of operations , financial position or cash flows . note 13 2013 leases our total rental expense under operating leases was $ 310 million , $ 324 million and $ 318 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . future minimum lease commitments at december 31 , 2006 for all operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year were $ 1.1 billion ( $ 288 million in 2007 , $ 254 million in 2008 , $ 211 million in 2009 , $ 153 million in 2010 , $ 118 million in 2011 and $ 121 million in later years ) . certain major plant facilities and equipment are furnished by the u.s . government under short-term or cancelable arrangements . note 14 2013 legal proceedings , commitments and contingencies we are a party to or have property subject to litigation and other proceedings , including matters arising under provisions relating to the protection of the environment . we believe the probability is remote that the outcome of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the corporation as a whole . we cannot predict the outcome of legal proceedings with certainty . these matters include the following items , all of which have been previously reported : on march 27 , 2006 , we received a subpoena issued by a grand jury in the united states district court for the northern district of ohio . the subpoena requests documents related to our application for patents issued in the united states and the united kingdom relating to a missile detection and warning technology . we are cooperating with the government 2019s investigation . on february 6 , 2004 , we submitted a certified contract claim to the united states requesting contractual indemnity for remediation and litigation costs ( past and future ) related to our former facility in redlands , california . we submitted the claim consistent with a claim sponsorship agreement with the boeing company ( boeing ) , executed in 2001 , in boeing 2019s role as the prime contractor on the short range attack missile ( sram ) program . the contract for the sram program , which formed a significant portion of our work at the redlands facility , had special contractual indemnities from the u.s . air force , as authorized by public law 85-804 . on august 31 , 2004 , the united states denied the claim . our appeal of that decision is pending with the armed services board of contract appeals . on august 28 , 2003 , the department of justice ( the doj ) filed complaints in partial intervention in two lawsuits filed under the qui tam provisions of the civil false claims act in the united states district court for the western district of kentucky , united states ex rel . natural resources defense council , et al v . lockheed martin corporation , et al , and united states ex rel . john d . tillson v . lockheed martin energy systems , inc. , et al . the doj alleges that we committed violations of the resource conservation and recovery act at the paducah gaseous diffusion plant by not properly handling , storing .
Question: as of december 31, 2006, what was the total of the future minimum lease commitments for all operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year?
| 1100.0 |
CONVFINQA_test510 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the defined benefit pension plans 2019 trust and $ 130 million to our retiree medical plans which will reduce our cash funding requirements for 2007 and 2008 . in 2007 , we expect to make no contributions to the defined benefit pension plans and expect to contribute $ 175 million to the retiree medical and life insurance plans , after giving consideration to the 2006 prepayments . the following benefit payments , which reflect expected future service , as appropriate , are expected to be paid : ( in millions ) pension benefits benefits . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>pensionbenefits</td><td>otherbenefits</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007</td><td>$ 1440</td><td>$ 260</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2008</td><td>1490</td><td>260</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>1540</td><td>270</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010</td><td>1600</td><td>270</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>1660</td><td>270</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>years 2012 2013 2016</td><td>9530</td><td>1260</td></tr></table> as noted previously , we also sponsor nonqualified defined benefit plans to provide benefits in excess of qualified plan limits . the aggregate liabilities for these plans at december 31 , 2006 were $ 641 million . the expense associated with these plans totaled $ 59 million in 2006 , $ 58 million in 2005 and $ 61 million in 2004 . we also sponsor a small number of foreign benefit plans . the liabilities and expenses associated with these plans are not material to our results of operations , financial position or cash flows . note 13 2013 leases our total rental expense under operating leases was $ 310 million , $ 324 million and $ 318 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . future minimum lease commitments at december 31 , 2006 for all operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year were $ 1.1 billion ( $ 288 million in 2007 , $ 254 million in 2008 , $ 211 million in 2009 , $ 153 million in 2010 , $ 118 million in 2011 and $ 121 million in later years ) . certain major plant facilities and equipment are furnished by the u.s . government under short-term or cancelable arrangements . note 14 2013 legal proceedings , commitments and contingencies we are a party to or have property subject to litigation and other proceedings , including matters arising under provisions relating to the protection of the environment . we believe the probability is remote that the outcome of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the corporation as a whole . we cannot predict the outcome of legal proceedings with certainty . these matters include the following items , all of which have been previously reported : on march 27 , 2006 , we received a subpoena issued by a grand jury in the united states district court for the northern district of ohio . the subpoena requests documents related to our application for patents issued in the united states and the united kingdom relating to a missile detection and warning technology . we are cooperating with the government 2019s investigation . on february 6 , 2004 , we submitted a certified contract claim to the united states requesting contractual indemnity for remediation and litigation costs ( past and future ) related to our former facility in redlands , california . we submitted the claim consistent with a claim sponsorship agreement with the boeing company ( boeing ) , executed in 2001 , in boeing 2019s role as the prime contractor on the short range attack missile ( sram ) program . the contract for the sram program , which formed a significant portion of our work at the redlands facility , had special contractual indemnities from the u.s . air force , as authorized by public law 85-804 . on august 31 , 2004 , the united states denied the claim . our appeal of that decision is pending with the armed services board of contract appeals . on august 28 , 2003 , the department of justice ( the doj ) filed complaints in partial intervention in two lawsuits filed under the qui tam provisions of the civil false claims act in the united states district court for the western district of kentucky , united states ex rel . natural resources defense council , et al v . lockheed martin corporation , et al , and united states ex rel . john d . tillson v . lockheed martin energy systems , inc. , et al . the doj alleges that we committed violations of the resource conservation and recovery act at the paducah gaseous diffusion plant by not properly handling , storing .
Question: as of december 31, 2006, what was the total of the future minimum lease commitments for all operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year?
Answer: 1100.0
Question: and what percentage from those commitments was due in 2007?
| 0.26182 |
CONVFINQA_test511 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the defined benefit pension plans 2019 trust and $ 130 million to our retiree medical plans which will reduce our cash funding requirements for 2007 and 2008 . in 2007 , we expect to make no contributions to the defined benefit pension plans and expect to contribute $ 175 million to the retiree medical and life insurance plans , after giving consideration to the 2006 prepayments . the following benefit payments , which reflect expected future service , as appropriate , are expected to be paid : ( in millions ) pension benefits benefits . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>pensionbenefits</td><td>otherbenefits</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007</td><td>$ 1440</td><td>$ 260</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2008</td><td>1490</td><td>260</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>1540</td><td>270</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010</td><td>1600</td><td>270</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>1660</td><td>270</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>years 2012 2013 2016</td><td>9530</td><td>1260</td></tr></table> as noted previously , we also sponsor nonqualified defined benefit plans to provide benefits in excess of qualified plan limits . the aggregate liabilities for these plans at december 31 , 2006 were $ 641 million . the expense associated with these plans totaled $ 59 million in 2006 , $ 58 million in 2005 and $ 61 million in 2004 . we also sponsor a small number of foreign benefit plans . the liabilities and expenses associated with these plans are not material to our results of operations , financial position or cash flows . note 13 2013 leases our total rental expense under operating leases was $ 310 million , $ 324 million and $ 318 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . future minimum lease commitments at december 31 , 2006 for all operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year were $ 1.1 billion ( $ 288 million in 2007 , $ 254 million in 2008 , $ 211 million in 2009 , $ 153 million in 2010 , $ 118 million in 2011 and $ 121 million in later years ) . certain major plant facilities and equipment are furnished by the u.s . government under short-term or cancelable arrangements . note 14 2013 legal proceedings , commitments and contingencies we are a party to or have property subject to litigation and other proceedings , including matters arising under provisions relating to the protection of the environment . we believe the probability is remote that the outcome of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the corporation as a whole . we cannot predict the outcome of legal proceedings with certainty . these matters include the following items , all of which have been previously reported : on march 27 , 2006 , we received a subpoena issued by a grand jury in the united states district court for the northern district of ohio . the subpoena requests documents related to our application for patents issued in the united states and the united kingdom relating to a missile detection and warning technology . we are cooperating with the government 2019s investigation . on february 6 , 2004 , we submitted a certified contract claim to the united states requesting contractual indemnity for remediation and litigation costs ( past and future ) related to our former facility in redlands , california . we submitted the claim consistent with a claim sponsorship agreement with the boeing company ( boeing ) , executed in 2001 , in boeing 2019s role as the prime contractor on the short range attack missile ( sram ) program . the contract for the sram program , which formed a significant portion of our work at the redlands facility , had special contractual indemnities from the u.s . air force , as authorized by public law 85-804 . on august 31 , 2004 , the united states denied the claim . our appeal of that decision is pending with the armed services board of contract appeals . on august 28 , 2003 , the department of justice ( the doj ) filed complaints in partial intervention in two lawsuits filed under the qui tam provisions of the civil false claims act in the united states district court for the western district of kentucky , united states ex rel . natural resources defense council , et al v . lockheed martin corporation , et al , and united states ex rel . john d . tillson v . lockheed martin energy systems , inc. , et al . the doj alleges that we committed violations of the resource conservation and recovery act at the paducah gaseous diffusion plant by not properly handling , storing .
Question: as of december 31, 2006, what was the total of the future minimum lease commitments for all operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year?
Answer: 1100.0
Question: and what percentage from those commitments was due in 2007?
Answer: 0.26182
Question: and in the precedent year of that date, in 2005, what was the rental expense under operating leases?
| 324.0 |
CONVFINQA_test512 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the defined benefit pension plans 2019 trust and $ 130 million to our retiree medical plans which will reduce our cash funding requirements for 2007 and 2008 . in 2007 , we expect to make no contributions to the defined benefit pension plans and expect to contribute $ 175 million to the retiree medical and life insurance plans , after giving consideration to the 2006 prepayments . the following benefit payments , which reflect expected future service , as appropriate , are expected to be paid : ( in millions ) pension benefits benefits . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>pensionbenefits</td><td>otherbenefits</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007</td><td>$ 1440</td><td>$ 260</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2008</td><td>1490</td><td>260</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>1540</td><td>270</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010</td><td>1600</td><td>270</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>1660</td><td>270</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>years 2012 2013 2016</td><td>9530</td><td>1260</td></tr></table> as noted previously , we also sponsor nonqualified defined benefit plans to provide benefits in excess of qualified plan limits . the aggregate liabilities for these plans at december 31 , 2006 were $ 641 million . the expense associated with these plans totaled $ 59 million in 2006 , $ 58 million in 2005 and $ 61 million in 2004 . we also sponsor a small number of foreign benefit plans . the liabilities and expenses associated with these plans are not material to our results of operations , financial position or cash flows . note 13 2013 leases our total rental expense under operating leases was $ 310 million , $ 324 million and $ 318 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . future minimum lease commitments at december 31 , 2006 for all operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year were $ 1.1 billion ( $ 288 million in 2007 , $ 254 million in 2008 , $ 211 million in 2009 , $ 153 million in 2010 , $ 118 million in 2011 and $ 121 million in later years ) . certain major plant facilities and equipment are furnished by the u.s . government under short-term or cancelable arrangements . note 14 2013 legal proceedings , commitments and contingencies we are a party to or have property subject to litigation and other proceedings , including matters arising under provisions relating to the protection of the environment . we believe the probability is remote that the outcome of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the corporation as a whole . we cannot predict the outcome of legal proceedings with certainty . these matters include the following items , all of which have been previously reported : on march 27 , 2006 , we received a subpoena issued by a grand jury in the united states district court for the northern district of ohio . the subpoena requests documents related to our application for patents issued in the united states and the united kingdom relating to a missile detection and warning technology . we are cooperating with the government 2019s investigation . on february 6 , 2004 , we submitted a certified contract claim to the united states requesting contractual indemnity for remediation and litigation costs ( past and future ) related to our former facility in redlands , california . we submitted the claim consistent with a claim sponsorship agreement with the boeing company ( boeing ) , executed in 2001 , in boeing 2019s role as the prime contractor on the short range attack missile ( sram ) program . the contract for the sram program , which formed a significant portion of our work at the redlands facility , had special contractual indemnities from the u.s . air force , as authorized by public law 85-804 . on august 31 , 2004 , the united states denied the claim . our appeal of that decision is pending with the armed services board of contract appeals . on august 28 , 2003 , the department of justice ( the doj ) filed complaints in partial intervention in two lawsuits filed under the qui tam provisions of the civil false claims act in the united states district court for the western district of kentucky , united states ex rel . natural resources defense council , et al v . lockheed martin corporation , et al , and united states ex rel . john d . tillson v . lockheed martin energy systems , inc. , et al . the doj alleges that we committed violations of the resource conservation and recovery act at the paducah gaseous diffusion plant by not properly handling , storing .
Question: as of december 31, 2006, what was the total of the future minimum lease commitments for all operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year?
Answer: 1100.0
Question: and what percentage from those commitments was due in 2007?
Answer: 0.26182
Question: and in the precedent year of that date, in 2005, what was the rental expense under operating leases?
Answer: 324.0
Question: what was it in 2004?
| 318.0 |
CONVFINQA_test513 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the defined benefit pension plans 2019 trust and $ 130 million to our retiree medical plans which will reduce our cash funding requirements for 2007 and 2008 . in 2007 , we expect to make no contributions to the defined benefit pension plans and expect to contribute $ 175 million to the retiree medical and life insurance plans , after giving consideration to the 2006 prepayments . the following benefit payments , which reflect expected future service , as appropriate , are expected to be paid : ( in millions ) pension benefits benefits . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>pensionbenefits</td><td>otherbenefits</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007</td><td>$ 1440</td><td>$ 260</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2008</td><td>1490</td><td>260</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>1540</td><td>270</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010</td><td>1600</td><td>270</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>1660</td><td>270</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>years 2012 2013 2016</td><td>9530</td><td>1260</td></tr></table> as noted previously , we also sponsor nonqualified defined benefit plans to provide benefits in excess of qualified plan limits . the aggregate liabilities for these plans at december 31 , 2006 were $ 641 million . the expense associated with these plans totaled $ 59 million in 2006 , $ 58 million in 2005 and $ 61 million in 2004 . we also sponsor a small number of foreign benefit plans . the liabilities and expenses associated with these plans are not material to our results of operations , financial position or cash flows . note 13 2013 leases our total rental expense under operating leases was $ 310 million , $ 324 million and $ 318 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . future minimum lease commitments at december 31 , 2006 for all operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year were $ 1.1 billion ( $ 288 million in 2007 , $ 254 million in 2008 , $ 211 million in 2009 , $ 153 million in 2010 , $ 118 million in 2011 and $ 121 million in later years ) . certain major plant facilities and equipment are furnished by the u.s . government under short-term or cancelable arrangements . note 14 2013 legal proceedings , commitments and contingencies we are a party to or have property subject to litigation and other proceedings , including matters arising under provisions relating to the protection of the environment . we believe the probability is remote that the outcome of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the corporation as a whole . we cannot predict the outcome of legal proceedings with certainty . these matters include the following items , all of which have been previously reported : on march 27 , 2006 , we received a subpoena issued by a grand jury in the united states district court for the northern district of ohio . the subpoena requests documents related to our application for patents issued in the united states and the united kingdom relating to a missile detection and warning technology . we are cooperating with the government 2019s investigation . on february 6 , 2004 , we submitted a certified contract claim to the united states requesting contractual indemnity for remediation and litigation costs ( past and future ) related to our former facility in redlands , california . we submitted the claim consistent with a claim sponsorship agreement with the boeing company ( boeing ) , executed in 2001 , in boeing 2019s role as the prime contractor on the short range attack missile ( sram ) program . the contract for the sram program , which formed a significant portion of our work at the redlands facility , had special contractual indemnities from the u.s . air force , as authorized by public law 85-804 . on august 31 , 2004 , the united states denied the claim . our appeal of that decision is pending with the armed services board of contract appeals . on august 28 , 2003 , the department of justice ( the doj ) filed complaints in partial intervention in two lawsuits filed under the qui tam provisions of the civil false claims act in the united states district court for the western district of kentucky , united states ex rel . natural resources defense council , et al v . lockheed martin corporation , et al , and united states ex rel . john d . tillson v . lockheed martin energy systems , inc. , et al . the doj alleges that we committed violations of the resource conservation and recovery act at the paducah gaseous diffusion plant by not properly handling , storing .
Question: as of december 31, 2006, what was the total of the future minimum lease commitments for all operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year?
Answer: 1100.0
Question: and what percentage from those commitments was due in 2007?
Answer: 0.26182
Question: and in the precedent year of that date, in 2005, what was the rental expense under operating leases?
Answer: 324.0
Question: what was it in 2004?
Answer: 318.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
| 6.0 |
CONVFINQA_test514 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the defined benefit pension plans 2019 trust and $ 130 million to our retiree medical plans which will reduce our cash funding requirements for 2007 and 2008 . in 2007 , we expect to make no contributions to the defined benefit pension plans and expect to contribute $ 175 million to the retiree medical and life insurance plans , after giving consideration to the 2006 prepayments . the following benefit payments , which reflect expected future service , as appropriate , are expected to be paid : ( in millions ) pension benefits benefits . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>pensionbenefits</td><td>otherbenefits</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007</td><td>$ 1440</td><td>$ 260</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2008</td><td>1490</td><td>260</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>1540</td><td>270</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010</td><td>1600</td><td>270</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>1660</td><td>270</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>years 2012 2013 2016</td><td>9530</td><td>1260</td></tr></table> as noted previously , we also sponsor nonqualified defined benefit plans to provide benefits in excess of qualified plan limits . the aggregate liabilities for these plans at december 31 , 2006 were $ 641 million . the expense associated with these plans totaled $ 59 million in 2006 , $ 58 million in 2005 and $ 61 million in 2004 . we also sponsor a small number of foreign benefit plans . the liabilities and expenses associated with these plans are not material to our results of operations , financial position or cash flows . note 13 2013 leases our total rental expense under operating leases was $ 310 million , $ 324 million and $ 318 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . future minimum lease commitments at december 31 , 2006 for all operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year were $ 1.1 billion ( $ 288 million in 2007 , $ 254 million in 2008 , $ 211 million in 2009 , $ 153 million in 2010 , $ 118 million in 2011 and $ 121 million in later years ) . certain major plant facilities and equipment are furnished by the u.s . government under short-term or cancelable arrangements . note 14 2013 legal proceedings , commitments and contingencies we are a party to or have property subject to litigation and other proceedings , including matters arising under provisions relating to the protection of the environment . we believe the probability is remote that the outcome of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the corporation as a whole . we cannot predict the outcome of legal proceedings with certainty . these matters include the following items , all of which have been previously reported : on march 27 , 2006 , we received a subpoena issued by a grand jury in the united states district court for the northern district of ohio . the subpoena requests documents related to our application for patents issued in the united states and the united kingdom relating to a missile detection and warning technology . we are cooperating with the government 2019s investigation . on february 6 , 2004 , we submitted a certified contract claim to the united states requesting contractual indemnity for remediation and litigation costs ( past and future ) related to our former facility in redlands , california . we submitted the claim consistent with a claim sponsorship agreement with the boeing company ( boeing ) , executed in 2001 , in boeing 2019s role as the prime contractor on the short range attack missile ( sram ) program . the contract for the sram program , which formed a significant portion of our work at the redlands facility , had special contractual indemnities from the u.s . air force , as authorized by public law 85-804 . on august 31 , 2004 , the united states denied the claim . our appeal of that decision is pending with the armed services board of contract appeals . on august 28 , 2003 , the department of justice ( the doj ) filed complaints in partial intervention in two lawsuits filed under the qui tam provisions of the civil false claims act in the united states district court for the western district of kentucky , united states ex rel . natural resources defense council , et al v . lockheed martin corporation , et al , and united states ex rel . john d . tillson v . lockheed martin energy systems , inc. , et al . the doj alleges that we committed violations of the resource conservation and recovery act at the paducah gaseous diffusion plant by not properly handling , storing .
Question: as of december 31, 2006, what was the total of the future minimum lease commitments for all operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year?
Answer: 1100.0
Question: and what percentage from those commitments was due in 2007?
Answer: 0.26182
Question: and in the precedent year of that date, in 2005, what was the rental expense under operating leases?
Answer: 324.0
Question: what was it in 2004?
Answer: 318.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Answer: 6.0
Question: and what was this change as a percent of the 2004 expense?
| 0.01887 |
CONVFINQA_test515 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
inventory on hand , as well as our future purchase commitments with our suppliers , considering multiple factors , including demand forecasts , product life cycle , current sales levels , pricing strategy and cost trends . if our review indicates that inventories of raw materials , components or finished products have become obsolete or are in excess of anticipated demand or that inventory cost exceeds net realizable value , we may be required to make adjustments that will impact the results of operations . goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets valuation - we test goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets for impairment annually or more frequently if events occur that would warrant such review . while the company has the option to perform a qualitative assessment for both goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets to determine if it is more likely than not that an impairment exists , the company elects to perform the quantitative assessment for our annual impairment analysis . the impairment analysis involves comparing the fair value of each reporting unit or non-amortizable intangible asset to the carrying value . if the carrying value exceeds the fair value , goodwill or a non-amortizable intangible asset is considered impaired . to determine the fair value of goodwill , we primarily use a discounted cash flow model , supported by the market approach using earnings multiples of comparable global and local companies within the tobacco industry . at december 31 , 2018 , the carrying value of our goodwill was $ 7.2 billion , which is related to ten reporting units , each of which consists of a group of markets with similar economic characteristics . the estimated fair value of each of our ten reporting units exceeded the carrying value as of december 31 , 2018 . to determine the fair value of non-amortizable intangible assets , we primarily use a discounted cash flow model applying the relief-from-royalty method . we concluded that the fair value of our non- amortizable intangible assets exceeded the carrying value . these discounted cash flow models include management assumptions relevant for forecasting operating cash flows , which are subject to changes in business conditions , such as volumes and prices , costs to produce , discount rates and estimated capital needs . management considers historical experience and all available information at the time the fair values are estimated , and we believe these assumptions are consistent with the assumptions a hypothetical marketplace participant would use . since the march 28 , 2008 , spin-off from altria group , inc. , we have not recorded a charge to earnings for an impairment of goodwill or non-amortizable intangible assets . marketing costs - we incur certain costs to support our products through programs that include advertising , marketing , consumer engagement and trade promotions . the costs of our advertising and marketing programs are expensed in accordance with u.s . gaap . recognition of the cost related to our consumer engagement and trade promotion programs contain uncertainties due to the judgment required in estimating the potential performance and compliance for each program . for volume-based incentives provided to customers , management continually assesses and estimates , by customer , the likelihood of the customer's achieving the specified targets , and records the reduction of revenue as the sales are made . for other trade promotions , management relies on estimated utilization rates that have been developed from historical experience . changes in the assumptions used in estimating the cost of any individual marketing program would not result in a material change in our financial position , results of operations or operating cash flows . employee benefit plans - as discussed in item 8 , note 13 . benefit plans to our consolidated financial statements , we provide a range of benefits to our employees and retired employees , including pensions , postretirement health care and postemployment benefits ( primarily severance ) . we record annual amounts relating to these plans based on calculations specified by u.s . gaap . these calculations include various actuarial assumptions , such as discount rates , assumed rates of return on plan assets , compensation increases , mortality , turnover rates and health care cost trend rates . we review actuarial assumptions on an annual basis and make modifications to the assumptions based on current rates and trends when it is deemed appropriate to do so . as permitted by u.s . gaap , any effect of the modifications is generally amortized over future periods . we believe that the assumptions utilized in calculating our obligations under these plans are reasonable based upon our historical experience and advice from our actuaries . weighted-average discount rate assumptions for pension and postretirement plan obligations at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pension plans</td><td>1.61% ( 1.61 % )</td><td>1.51% ( 1.51 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>postretirement plans</td><td>3.97% ( 3.97 % )</td><td>3.79% ( 3.79 % )</td></tr></table> we anticipate that assumption changes will increase 2019 pre-tax pension and postretirement expense to approximately $ 205 million as compared with approximately $ 160 million in 2018 , excluding amounts related to employee severance and early retirement programs . the anticipated increase is primarily due to higher amortization out of other comprehensive earnings for unrecognized actuarial gains/ losses of $ 14 million , coupled with lower return on assets of $ 16 million , higher interest and service cost of $ 12 million and $ 4 million respectively , partially offset by other movements of $ 1 million . weighted-average expected rate of return and discount rate assumptions have a significant effect on the amount of expense reported for the employee benefit plans . a fifty-basis-point decrease in our discount rate would increase our 2019 pension and postretirement expense by approximately $ 50 million , and a fifty-basis-point increase in our discount rate would decrease our 2019 pension and postretirement .
Question: what is the pre-tax pension and postretirement expense in 2019?
| 205.0 |
CONVFINQA_test516 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
inventory on hand , as well as our future purchase commitments with our suppliers , considering multiple factors , including demand forecasts , product life cycle , current sales levels , pricing strategy and cost trends . if our review indicates that inventories of raw materials , components or finished products have become obsolete or are in excess of anticipated demand or that inventory cost exceeds net realizable value , we may be required to make adjustments that will impact the results of operations . goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets valuation - we test goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets for impairment annually or more frequently if events occur that would warrant such review . while the company has the option to perform a qualitative assessment for both goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets to determine if it is more likely than not that an impairment exists , the company elects to perform the quantitative assessment for our annual impairment analysis . the impairment analysis involves comparing the fair value of each reporting unit or non-amortizable intangible asset to the carrying value . if the carrying value exceeds the fair value , goodwill or a non-amortizable intangible asset is considered impaired . to determine the fair value of goodwill , we primarily use a discounted cash flow model , supported by the market approach using earnings multiples of comparable global and local companies within the tobacco industry . at december 31 , 2018 , the carrying value of our goodwill was $ 7.2 billion , which is related to ten reporting units , each of which consists of a group of markets with similar economic characteristics . the estimated fair value of each of our ten reporting units exceeded the carrying value as of december 31 , 2018 . to determine the fair value of non-amortizable intangible assets , we primarily use a discounted cash flow model applying the relief-from-royalty method . we concluded that the fair value of our non- amortizable intangible assets exceeded the carrying value . these discounted cash flow models include management assumptions relevant for forecasting operating cash flows , which are subject to changes in business conditions , such as volumes and prices , costs to produce , discount rates and estimated capital needs . management considers historical experience and all available information at the time the fair values are estimated , and we believe these assumptions are consistent with the assumptions a hypothetical marketplace participant would use . since the march 28 , 2008 , spin-off from altria group , inc. , we have not recorded a charge to earnings for an impairment of goodwill or non-amortizable intangible assets . marketing costs - we incur certain costs to support our products through programs that include advertising , marketing , consumer engagement and trade promotions . the costs of our advertising and marketing programs are expensed in accordance with u.s . gaap . recognition of the cost related to our consumer engagement and trade promotion programs contain uncertainties due to the judgment required in estimating the potential performance and compliance for each program . for volume-based incentives provided to customers , management continually assesses and estimates , by customer , the likelihood of the customer's achieving the specified targets , and records the reduction of revenue as the sales are made . for other trade promotions , management relies on estimated utilization rates that have been developed from historical experience . changes in the assumptions used in estimating the cost of any individual marketing program would not result in a material change in our financial position , results of operations or operating cash flows . employee benefit plans - as discussed in item 8 , note 13 . benefit plans to our consolidated financial statements , we provide a range of benefits to our employees and retired employees , including pensions , postretirement health care and postemployment benefits ( primarily severance ) . we record annual amounts relating to these plans based on calculations specified by u.s . gaap . these calculations include various actuarial assumptions , such as discount rates , assumed rates of return on plan assets , compensation increases , mortality , turnover rates and health care cost trend rates . we review actuarial assumptions on an annual basis and make modifications to the assumptions based on current rates and trends when it is deemed appropriate to do so . as permitted by u.s . gaap , any effect of the modifications is generally amortized over future periods . we believe that the assumptions utilized in calculating our obligations under these plans are reasonable based upon our historical experience and advice from our actuaries . weighted-average discount rate assumptions for pension and postretirement plan obligations at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pension plans</td><td>1.61% ( 1.61 % )</td><td>1.51% ( 1.51 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>postretirement plans</td><td>3.97% ( 3.97 % )</td><td>3.79% ( 3.79 % )</td></tr></table> we anticipate that assumption changes will increase 2019 pre-tax pension and postretirement expense to approximately $ 205 million as compared with approximately $ 160 million in 2018 , excluding amounts related to employee severance and early retirement programs . the anticipated increase is primarily due to higher amortization out of other comprehensive earnings for unrecognized actuarial gains/ losses of $ 14 million , coupled with lower return on assets of $ 16 million , higher interest and service cost of $ 12 million and $ 4 million respectively , partially offset by other movements of $ 1 million . weighted-average expected rate of return and discount rate assumptions have a significant effect on the amount of expense reported for the employee benefit plans . a fifty-basis-point decrease in our discount rate would increase our 2019 pension and postretirement expense by approximately $ 50 million , and a fifty-basis-point increase in our discount rate would decrease our 2019 pension and postretirement .
Question: what is the pre-tax pension and postretirement expense in 2019?
Answer: 205.0
Question: and what is it in 2018?
| 160.0 |
CONVFINQA_test517 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
inventory on hand , as well as our future purchase commitments with our suppliers , considering multiple factors , including demand forecasts , product life cycle , current sales levels , pricing strategy and cost trends . if our review indicates that inventories of raw materials , components or finished products have become obsolete or are in excess of anticipated demand or that inventory cost exceeds net realizable value , we may be required to make adjustments that will impact the results of operations . goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets valuation - we test goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets for impairment annually or more frequently if events occur that would warrant such review . while the company has the option to perform a qualitative assessment for both goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets to determine if it is more likely than not that an impairment exists , the company elects to perform the quantitative assessment for our annual impairment analysis . the impairment analysis involves comparing the fair value of each reporting unit or non-amortizable intangible asset to the carrying value . if the carrying value exceeds the fair value , goodwill or a non-amortizable intangible asset is considered impaired . to determine the fair value of goodwill , we primarily use a discounted cash flow model , supported by the market approach using earnings multiples of comparable global and local companies within the tobacco industry . at december 31 , 2018 , the carrying value of our goodwill was $ 7.2 billion , which is related to ten reporting units , each of which consists of a group of markets with similar economic characteristics . the estimated fair value of each of our ten reporting units exceeded the carrying value as of december 31 , 2018 . to determine the fair value of non-amortizable intangible assets , we primarily use a discounted cash flow model applying the relief-from-royalty method . we concluded that the fair value of our non- amortizable intangible assets exceeded the carrying value . these discounted cash flow models include management assumptions relevant for forecasting operating cash flows , which are subject to changes in business conditions , such as volumes and prices , costs to produce , discount rates and estimated capital needs . management considers historical experience and all available information at the time the fair values are estimated , and we believe these assumptions are consistent with the assumptions a hypothetical marketplace participant would use . since the march 28 , 2008 , spin-off from altria group , inc. , we have not recorded a charge to earnings for an impairment of goodwill or non-amortizable intangible assets . marketing costs - we incur certain costs to support our products through programs that include advertising , marketing , consumer engagement and trade promotions . the costs of our advertising and marketing programs are expensed in accordance with u.s . gaap . recognition of the cost related to our consumer engagement and trade promotion programs contain uncertainties due to the judgment required in estimating the potential performance and compliance for each program . for volume-based incentives provided to customers , management continually assesses and estimates , by customer , the likelihood of the customer's achieving the specified targets , and records the reduction of revenue as the sales are made . for other trade promotions , management relies on estimated utilization rates that have been developed from historical experience . changes in the assumptions used in estimating the cost of any individual marketing program would not result in a material change in our financial position , results of operations or operating cash flows . employee benefit plans - as discussed in item 8 , note 13 . benefit plans to our consolidated financial statements , we provide a range of benefits to our employees and retired employees , including pensions , postretirement health care and postemployment benefits ( primarily severance ) . we record annual amounts relating to these plans based on calculations specified by u.s . gaap . these calculations include various actuarial assumptions , such as discount rates , assumed rates of return on plan assets , compensation increases , mortality , turnover rates and health care cost trend rates . we review actuarial assumptions on an annual basis and make modifications to the assumptions based on current rates and trends when it is deemed appropriate to do so . as permitted by u.s . gaap , any effect of the modifications is generally amortized over future periods . we believe that the assumptions utilized in calculating our obligations under these plans are reasonable based upon our historical experience and advice from our actuaries . weighted-average discount rate assumptions for pension and postretirement plan obligations at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pension plans</td><td>1.61% ( 1.61 % )</td><td>1.51% ( 1.51 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>postretirement plans</td><td>3.97% ( 3.97 % )</td><td>3.79% ( 3.79 % )</td></tr></table> we anticipate that assumption changes will increase 2019 pre-tax pension and postretirement expense to approximately $ 205 million as compared with approximately $ 160 million in 2018 , excluding amounts related to employee severance and early retirement programs . the anticipated increase is primarily due to higher amortization out of other comprehensive earnings for unrecognized actuarial gains/ losses of $ 14 million , coupled with lower return on assets of $ 16 million , higher interest and service cost of $ 12 million and $ 4 million respectively , partially offset by other movements of $ 1 million . weighted-average expected rate of return and discount rate assumptions have a significant effect on the amount of expense reported for the employee benefit plans . a fifty-basis-point decrease in our discount rate would increase our 2019 pension and postretirement expense by approximately $ 50 million , and a fifty-basis-point increase in our discount rate would decrease our 2019 pension and postretirement .
Question: what is the pre-tax pension and postretirement expense in 2019?
Answer: 205.0
Question: and what is it in 2018?
Answer: 160.0
Question: what is, then, the change over the year?
| 45.0 |
CONVFINQA_test518 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
inventory on hand , as well as our future purchase commitments with our suppliers , considering multiple factors , including demand forecasts , product life cycle , current sales levels , pricing strategy and cost trends . if our review indicates that inventories of raw materials , components or finished products have become obsolete or are in excess of anticipated demand or that inventory cost exceeds net realizable value , we may be required to make adjustments that will impact the results of operations . goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets valuation - we test goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets for impairment annually or more frequently if events occur that would warrant such review . while the company has the option to perform a qualitative assessment for both goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets to determine if it is more likely than not that an impairment exists , the company elects to perform the quantitative assessment for our annual impairment analysis . the impairment analysis involves comparing the fair value of each reporting unit or non-amortizable intangible asset to the carrying value . if the carrying value exceeds the fair value , goodwill or a non-amortizable intangible asset is considered impaired . to determine the fair value of goodwill , we primarily use a discounted cash flow model , supported by the market approach using earnings multiples of comparable global and local companies within the tobacco industry . at december 31 , 2018 , the carrying value of our goodwill was $ 7.2 billion , which is related to ten reporting units , each of which consists of a group of markets with similar economic characteristics . the estimated fair value of each of our ten reporting units exceeded the carrying value as of december 31 , 2018 . to determine the fair value of non-amortizable intangible assets , we primarily use a discounted cash flow model applying the relief-from-royalty method . we concluded that the fair value of our non- amortizable intangible assets exceeded the carrying value . these discounted cash flow models include management assumptions relevant for forecasting operating cash flows , which are subject to changes in business conditions , such as volumes and prices , costs to produce , discount rates and estimated capital needs . management considers historical experience and all available information at the time the fair values are estimated , and we believe these assumptions are consistent with the assumptions a hypothetical marketplace participant would use . since the march 28 , 2008 , spin-off from altria group , inc. , we have not recorded a charge to earnings for an impairment of goodwill or non-amortizable intangible assets . marketing costs - we incur certain costs to support our products through programs that include advertising , marketing , consumer engagement and trade promotions . the costs of our advertising and marketing programs are expensed in accordance with u.s . gaap . recognition of the cost related to our consumer engagement and trade promotion programs contain uncertainties due to the judgment required in estimating the potential performance and compliance for each program . for volume-based incentives provided to customers , management continually assesses and estimates , by customer , the likelihood of the customer's achieving the specified targets , and records the reduction of revenue as the sales are made . for other trade promotions , management relies on estimated utilization rates that have been developed from historical experience . changes in the assumptions used in estimating the cost of any individual marketing program would not result in a material change in our financial position , results of operations or operating cash flows . employee benefit plans - as discussed in item 8 , note 13 . benefit plans to our consolidated financial statements , we provide a range of benefits to our employees and retired employees , including pensions , postretirement health care and postemployment benefits ( primarily severance ) . we record annual amounts relating to these plans based on calculations specified by u.s . gaap . these calculations include various actuarial assumptions , such as discount rates , assumed rates of return on plan assets , compensation increases , mortality , turnover rates and health care cost trend rates . we review actuarial assumptions on an annual basis and make modifications to the assumptions based on current rates and trends when it is deemed appropriate to do so . as permitted by u.s . gaap , any effect of the modifications is generally amortized over future periods . we believe that the assumptions utilized in calculating our obligations under these plans are reasonable based upon our historical experience and advice from our actuaries . weighted-average discount rate assumptions for pension and postretirement plan obligations at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pension plans</td><td>1.61% ( 1.61 % )</td><td>1.51% ( 1.51 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>postretirement plans</td><td>3.97% ( 3.97 % )</td><td>3.79% ( 3.79 % )</td></tr></table> we anticipate that assumption changes will increase 2019 pre-tax pension and postretirement expense to approximately $ 205 million as compared with approximately $ 160 million in 2018 , excluding amounts related to employee severance and early retirement programs . the anticipated increase is primarily due to higher amortization out of other comprehensive earnings for unrecognized actuarial gains/ losses of $ 14 million , coupled with lower return on assets of $ 16 million , higher interest and service cost of $ 12 million and $ 4 million respectively , partially offset by other movements of $ 1 million . weighted-average expected rate of return and discount rate assumptions have a significant effect on the amount of expense reported for the employee benefit plans . a fifty-basis-point decrease in our discount rate would increase our 2019 pension and postretirement expense by approximately $ 50 million , and a fifty-basis-point increase in our discount rate would decrease our 2019 pension and postretirement .
Question: what is the pre-tax pension and postretirement expense in 2019?
Answer: 205.0
Question: and what is it in 2018?
Answer: 160.0
Question: what is, then, the change over the year?
Answer: 45.0
Question: what is the pre-tax pension and postretirement expense in 2018?
| 160.0 |
CONVFINQA_test519 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
inventory on hand , as well as our future purchase commitments with our suppliers , considering multiple factors , including demand forecasts , product life cycle , current sales levels , pricing strategy and cost trends . if our review indicates that inventories of raw materials , components or finished products have become obsolete or are in excess of anticipated demand or that inventory cost exceeds net realizable value , we may be required to make adjustments that will impact the results of operations . goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets valuation - we test goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets for impairment annually or more frequently if events occur that would warrant such review . while the company has the option to perform a qualitative assessment for both goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets to determine if it is more likely than not that an impairment exists , the company elects to perform the quantitative assessment for our annual impairment analysis . the impairment analysis involves comparing the fair value of each reporting unit or non-amortizable intangible asset to the carrying value . if the carrying value exceeds the fair value , goodwill or a non-amortizable intangible asset is considered impaired . to determine the fair value of goodwill , we primarily use a discounted cash flow model , supported by the market approach using earnings multiples of comparable global and local companies within the tobacco industry . at december 31 , 2018 , the carrying value of our goodwill was $ 7.2 billion , which is related to ten reporting units , each of which consists of a group of markets with similar economic characteristics . the estimated fair value of each of our ten reporting units exceeded the carrying value as of december 31 , 2018 . to determine the fair value of non-amortizable intangible assets , we primarily use a discounted cash flow model applying the relief-from-royalty method . we concluded that the fair value of our non- amortizable intangible assets exceeded the carrying value . these discounted cash flow models include management assumptions relevant for forecasting operating cash flows , which are subject to changes in business conditions , such as volumes and prices , costs to produce , discount rates and estimated capital needs . management considers historical experience and all available information at the time the fair values are estimated , and we believe these assumptions are consistent with the assumptions a hypothetical marketplace participant would use . since the march 28 , 2008 , spin-off from altria group , inc. , we have not recorded a charge to earnings for an impairment of goodwill or non-amortizable intangible assets . marketing costs - we incur certain costs to support our products through programs that include advertising , marketing , consumer engagement and trade promotions . the costs of our advertising and marketing programs are expensed in accordance with u.s . gaap . recognition of the cost related to our consumer engagement and trade promotion programs contain uncertainties due to the judgment required in estimating the potential performance and compliance for each program . for volume-based incentives provided to customers , management continually assesses and estimates , by customer , the likelihood of the customer's achieving the specified targets , and records the reduction of revenue as the sales are made . for other trade promotions , management relies on estimated utilization rates that have been developed from historical experience . changes in the assumptions used in estimating the cost of any individual marketing program would not result in a material change in our financial position , results of operations or operating cash flows . employee benefit plans - as discussed in item 8 , note 13 . benefit plans to our consolidated financial statements , we provide a range of benefits to our employees and retired employees , including pensions , postretirement health care and postemployment benefits ( primarily severance ) . we record annual amounts relating to these plans based on calculations specified by u.s . gaap . these calculations include various actuarial assumptions , such as discount rates , assumed rates of return on plan assets , compensation increases , mortality , turnover rates and health care cost trend rates . we review actuarial assumptions on an annual basis and make modifications to the assumptions based on current rates and trends when it is deemed appropriate to do so . as permitted by u.s . gaap , any effect of the modifications is generally amortized over future periods . we believe that the assumptions utilized in calculating our obligations under these plans are reasonable based upon our historical experience and advice from our actuaries . weighted-average discount rate assumptions for pension and postretirement plan obligations at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pension plans</td><td>1.61% ( 1.61 % )</td><td>1.51% ( 1.51 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>postretirement plans</td><td>3.97% ( 3.97 % )</td><td>3.79% ( 3.79 % )</td></tr></table> we anticipate that assumption changes will increase 2019 pre-tax pension and postretirement expense to approximately $ 205 million as compared with approximately $ 160 million in 2018 , excluding amounts related to employee severance and early retirement programs . the anticipated increase is primarily due to higher amortization out of other comprehensive earnings for unrecognized actuarial gains/ losses of $ 14 million , coupled with lower return on assets of $ 16 million , higher interest and service cost of $ 12 million and $ 4 million respectively , partially offset by other movements of $ 1 million . weighted-average expected rate of return and discount rate assumptions have a significant effect on the amount of expense reported for the employee benefit plans . a fifty-basis-point decrease in our discount rate would increase our 2019 pension and postretirement expense by approximately $ 50 million , and a fifty-basis-point increase in our discount rate would decrease our 2019 pension and postretirement .
Question: what is the pre-tax pension and postretirement expense in 2019?
Answer: 205.0
Question: and what is it in 2018?
Answer: 160.0
Question: what is, then, the change over the year?
Answer: 45.0
Question: what is the pre-tax pension and postretirement expense in 2018?
Answer: 160.0
Question: and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2018 expense, in percentage?
| 0.28125 |
CONVFINQA_test520 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
december 31 , 2011 , the company recognized a decrease of $ 3 million of tax-related interest and penalties and had approximately $ 16 million accrued at december 31 , 2011 . note 12 derivative instruments and fair value measurements the company is exposed to certain market risks such as changes in interest rates , foreign currency exchange rates , and commodity prices , which exist as a part of its ongoing business operations . management uses derivative financial and commodity instruments , including futures , options , and swaps , where appropriate , to manage these risks . instruments used as hedges must be effective at reducing the risk associated with the exposure being hedged and must be designated as a hedge at the inception of the contract . the company designates derivatives as cash flow hedges , fair value hedges , net investment hedges , and uses other contracts to reduce volatility in interest rates , foreign currency and commodities . as a matter of policy , the company does not engage in trading or speculative hedging transactions . total notional amounts of the company 2019s derivative instruments as of december 28 , 2013 and december 29 , 2012 were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>foreign currency exchange contracts</td><td>$ 517</td><td>$ 570</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest rate contracts</td><td>2400</td><td>2150</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>commodity contracts</td><td>361</td><td>320</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3278</td><td>$ 3040</td></tr></table> following is a description of each category in the fair value hierarchy and the financial assets and liabilities of the company that were included in each category at december 28 , 2013 and december 29 , 2012 , measured on a recurring basis . level 1 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market . for the company , level 1 financial assets and liabilities consist primarily of commodity derivative contracts . level 2 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or model inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term of the asset or liability . for the company , level 2 financial assets and liabilities consist of interest rate swaps and over-the-counter commodity and currency contracts . the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of interest rate swaps is derived from a discounted cash flow analysis based on the terms of the contract and the interest rate curve . over-the-counter commodity derivatives are valued using an income approach based on the commodity index prices less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount . foreign currency contracts are valued using an income approach based on forward rates less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount . the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of level 2 financial assets and liabilities takes into consideration the risk of nonperformance , including counterparty credit risk . level 3 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement . these inputs reflect management 2019s own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability . the company did not have any level 3 financial assets or liabilities as of december 28 , 2013 or december 29 , 2012. .
Question: what was the accrued value of tax related interest and penalties in 2011?
| 16.0 |
CONVFINQA_test521 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
december 31 , 2011 , the company recognized a decrease of $ 3 million of tax-related interest and penalties and had approximately $ 16 million accrued at december 31 , 2011 . note 12 derivative instruments and fair value measurements the company is exposed to certain market risks such as changes in interest rates , foreign currency exchange rates , and commodity prices , which exist as a part of its ongoing business operations . management uses derivative financial and commodity instruments , including futures , options , and swaps , where appropriate , to manage these risks . instruments used as hedges must be effective at reducing the risk associated with the exposure being hedged and must be designated as a hedge at the inception of the contract . the company designates derivatives as cash flow hedges , fair value hedges , net investment hedges , and uses other contracts to reduce volatility in interest rates , foreign currency and commodities . as a matter of policy , the company does not engage in trading or speculative hedging transactions . total notional amounts of the company 2019s derivative instruments as of december 28 , 2013 and december 29 , 2012 were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>foreign currency exchange contracts</td><td>$ 517</td><td>$ 570</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest rate contracts</td><td>2400</td><td>2150</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>commodity contracts</td><td>361</td><td>320</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3278</td><td>$ 3040</td></tr></table> following is a description of each category in the fair value hierarchy and the financial assets and liabilities of the company that were included in each category at december 28 , 2013 and december 29 , 2012 , measured on a recurring basis . level 1 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market . for the company , level 1 financial assets and liabilities consist primarily of commodity derivative contracts . level 2 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or model inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term of the asset or liability . for the company , level 2 financial assets and liabilities consist of interest rate swaps and over-the-counter commodity and currency contracts . the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of interest rate swaps is derived from a discounted cash flow analysis based on the terms of the contract and the interest rate curve . over-the-counter commodity derivatives are valued using an income approach based on the commodity index prices less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount . foreign currency contracts are valued using an income approach based on forward rates less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount . the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of level 2 financial assets and liabilities takes into consideration the risk of nonperformance , including counterparty credit risk . level 3 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement . these inputs reflect management 2019s own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability . the company did not have any level 3 financial assets or liabilities as of december 28 , 2013 or december 29 , 2012. .
Question: what was the accrued value of tax related interest and penalties in 2011?
Answer: 16.0
Question: what was the value decrease during the year?
| 3.0 |
CONVFINQA_test522 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
december 31 , 2011 , the company recognized a decrease of $ 3 million of tax-related interest and penalties and had approximately $ 16 million accrued at december 31 , 2011 . note 12 derivative instruments and fair value measurements the company is exposed to certain market risks such as changes in interest rates , foreign currency exchange rates , and commodity prices , which exist as a part of its ongoing business operations . management uses derivative financial and commodity instruments , including futures , options , and swaps , where appropriate , to manage these risks . instruments used as hedges must be effective at reducing the risk associated with the exposure being hedged and must be designated as a hedge at the inception of the contract . the company designates derivatives as cash flow hedges , fair value hedges , net investment hedges , and uses other contracts to reduce volatility in interest rates , foreign currency and commodities . as a matter of policy , the company does not engage in trading or speculative hedging transactions . total notional amounts of the company 2019s derivative instruments as of december 28 , 2013 and december 29 , 2012 were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>foreign currency exchange contracts</td><td>$ 517</td><td>$ 570</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest rate contracts</td><td>2400</td><td>2150</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>commodity contracts</td><td>361</td><td>320</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3278</td><td>$ 3040</td></tr></table> following is a description of each category in the fair value hierarchy and the financial assets and liabilities of the company that were included in each category at december 28 , 2013 and december 29 , 2012 , measured on a recurring basis . level 1 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market . for the company , level 1 financial assets and liabilities consist primarily of commodity derivative contracts . level 2 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or model inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term of the asset or liability . for the company , level 2 financial assets and liabilities consist of interest rate swaps and over-the-counter commodity and currency contracts . the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of interest rate swaps is derived from a discounted cash flow analysis based on the terms of the contract and the interest rate curve . over-the-counter commodity derivatives are valued using an income approach based on the commodity index prices less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount . foreign currency contracts are valued using an income approach based on forward rates less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount . the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of level 2 financial assets and liabilities takes into consideration the risk of nonperformance , including counterparty credit risk . level 3 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement . these inputs reflect management 2019s own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability . the company did not have any level 3 financial assets or liabilities as of december 28 , 2013 or december 29 , 2012. .
Question: what was the accrued value of tax related interest and penalties in 2011?
Answer: 16.0
Question: what was the value decrease during the year?
Answer: 3.0
Question: what is the sum?
| 19.0 |
CONVFINQA_test523 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
december 31 , 2011 , the company recognized a decrease of $ 3 million of tax-related interest and penalties and had approximately $ 16 million accrued at december 31 , 2011 . note 12 derivative instruments and fair value measurements the company is exposed to certain market risks such as changes in interest rates , foreign currency exchange rates , and commodity prices , which exist as a part of its ongoing business operations . management uses derivative financial and commodity instruments , including futures , options , and swaps , where appropriate , to manage these risks . instruments used as hedges must be effective at reducing the risk associated with the exposure being hedged and must be designated as a hedge at the inception of the contract . the company designates derivatives as cash flow hedges , fair value hedges , net investment hedges , and uses other contracts to reduce volatility in interest rates , foreign currency and commodities . as a matter of policy , the company does not engage in trading or speculative hedging transactions . total notional amounts of the company 2019s derivative instruments as of december 28 , 2013 and december 29 , 2012 were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>foreign currency exchange contracts</td><td>$ 517</td><td>$ 570</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest rate contracts</td><td>2400</td><td>2150</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>commodity contracts</td><td>361</td><td>320</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3278</td><td>$ 3040</td></tr></table> following is a description of each category in the fair value hierarchy and the financial assets and liabilities of the company that were included in each category at december 28 , 2013 and december 29 , 2012 , measured on a recurring basis . level 1 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market . for the company , level 1 financial assets and liabilities consist primarily of commodity derivative contracts . level 2 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or model inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term of the asset or liability . for the company , level 2 financial assets and liabilities consist of interest rate swaps and over-the-counter commodity and currency contracts . the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of interest rate swaps is derived from a discounted cash flow analysis based on the terms of the contract and the interest rate curve . over-the-counter commodity derivatives are valued using an income approach based on the commodity index prices less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount . foreign currency contracts are valued using an income approach based on forward rates less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount . the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of level 2 financial assets and liabilities takes into consideration the risk of nonperformance , including counterparty credit risk . level 3 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement . these inputs reflect management 2019s own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability . the company did not have any level 3 financial assets or liabilities as of december 28 , 2013 or december 29 , 2012. .
Question: what was the accrued value of tax related interest and penalties in 2011?
Answer: 16.0
Question: what was the value decrease during the year?
Answer: 3.0
Question: what is the sum?
Answer: 19.0
Question: what was the value decrease during the year?
| 3.0 |
CONVFINQA_test524 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
december 31 , 2011 , the company recognized a decrease of $ 3 million of tax-related interest and penalties and had approximately $ 16 million accrued at december 31 , 2011 . note 12 derivative instruments and fair value measurements the company is exposed to certain market risks such as changes in interest rates , foreign currency exchange rates , and commodity prices , which exist as a part of its ongoing business operations . management uses derivative financial and commodity instruments , including futures , options , and swaps , where appropriate , to manage these risks . instruments used as hedges must be effective at reducing the risk associated with the exposure being hedged and must be designated as a hedge at the inception of the contract . the company designates derivatives as cash flow hedges , fair value hedges , net investment hedges , and uses other contracts to reduce volatility in interest rates , foreign currency and commodities . as a matter of policy , the company does not engage in trading or speculative hedging transactions . total notional amounts of the company 2019s derivative instruments as of december 28 , 2013 and december 29 , 2012 were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>foreign currency exchange contracts</td><td>$ 517</td><td>$ 570</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest rate contracts</td><td>2400</td><td>2150</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>commodity contracts</td><td>361</td><td>320</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3278</td><td>$ 3040</td></tr></table> following is a description of each category in the fair value hierarchy and the financial assets and liabilities of the company that were included in each category at december 28 , 2013 and december 29 , 2012 , measured on a recurring basis . level 1 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market . for the company , level 1 financial assets and liabilities consist primarily of commodity derivative contracts . level 2 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or model inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term of the asset or liability . for the company , level 2 financial assets and liabilities consist of interest rate swaps and over-the-counter commodity and currency contracts . the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of interest rate swaps is derived from a discounted cash flow analysis based on the terms of the contract and the interest rate curve . over-the-counter commodity derivatives are valued using an income approach based on the commodity index prices less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount . foreign currency contracts are valued using an income approach based on forward rates less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount . the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of level 2 financial assets and liabilities takes into consideration the risk of nonperformance , including counterparty credit risk . level 3 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement . these inputs reflect management 2019s own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability . the company did not have any level 3 financial assets or liabilities as of december 28 , 2013 or december 29 , 2012. .
Question: what was the accrued value of tax related interest and penalties in 2011?
Answer: 16.0
Question: what was the value decrease during the year?
Answer: 3.0
Question: what is the sum?
Answer: 19.0
Question: what was the value decrease during the year?
Answer: 3.0
Question: what is the decreased value divided by the prior sum?
| 0.15789 |
CONVFINQA_test525 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy mississippi , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis 2010 compared to 2009 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2010 to 2009 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009 net revenue</td><td>$ 536.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>18.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other</td><td>-0.3 ( 0.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010 net revenue</td><td>$ 555.3</td></tr></table> the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 1046 gwh , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in billed electricity usage in all sectors , primarily due to the effect of more favorable weather on the residential sector . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 22 million in power management rider revenue as the result of higher rates , the volume/weather variance discussed above , and an increase in grand gulf rider revenue as a result of higher rates and increased usage , offset by a decrease of $ 23.5 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to lower fuel rates . fuel and purchased power expenses decreased primarily due to a decrease in deferred fuel expense as a result of prior over-collections , offset by an increase in the average market price of purchased power coupled with increased net area demand . other regulatory charges increased primarily due to increased recovery of costs associated with the power management recovery rider . other income statement variances 2011 compared to 2010 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : a $ 5.4 million decrease in compensation and benefits costs primarily resulting from an increase in the accrual for incentive-based compensation in 2010 and a decrease in stock option expense ; and the sale of $ 4.9 million of surplus oil inventory . the decrease was partially offset by an increase of $ 3.9 million in legal expenses due to the deferral in 2010 of certain litigation expenses in accordance with regulatory treatment . taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to an increase in ad valorem taxes due to a higher 2011 assessment as compared to 2010 , partially offset by higher capitalized property taxes as compared with prior year . depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to an increase in plant in service . interest expense decreased primarily due to a revision caused by ferc 2019s acceptance of a change in the treatment of funds received from independent power producers for transmission interconnection projects. .
Question: what is the effect of volume/weather in net revenue during 2010, in millions?
| 18.9 |
CONVFINQA_test526 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy mississippi , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis 2010 compared to 2009 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2010 to 2009 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009 net revenue</td><td>$ 536.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>18.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other</td><td>-0.3 ( 0.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010 net revenue</td><td>$ 555.3</td></tr></table> the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 1046 gwh , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in billed electricity usage in all sectors , primarily due to the effect of more favorable weather on the residential sector . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 22 million in power management rider revenue as the result of higher rates , the volume/weather variance discussed above , and an increase in grand gulf rider revenue as a result of higher rates and increased usage , offset by a decrease of $ 23.5 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to lower fuel rates . fuel and purchased power expenses decreased primarily due to a decrease in deferred fuel expense as a result of prior over-collections , offset by an increase in the average market price of purchased power coupled with increased net area demand . other regulatory charges increased primarily due to increased recovery of costs associated with the power management recovery rider . other income statement variances 2011 compared to 2010 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : a $ 5.4 million decrease in compensation and benefits costs primarily resulting from an increase in the accrual for incentive-based compensation in 2010 and a decrease in stock option expense ; and the sale of $ 4.9 million of surplus oil inventory . the decrease was partially offset by an increase of $ 3.9 million in legal expenses due to the deferral in 2010 of certain litigation expenses in accordance with regulatory treatment . taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to an increase in ad valorem taxes due to a higher 2011 assessment as compared to 2010 , partially offset by higher capitalized property taxes as compared with prior year . depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to an increase in plant in service . interest expense decreased primarily due to a revision caused by ferc 2019s acceptance of a change in the treatment of funds received from independent power producers for transmission interconnection projects. .
Question: what is the effect of volume/weather in net revenue during 2010, in millions?
Answer: 18.9
Question: what about in full dollars?
| 18900000.0 |
CONVFINQA_test527 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy mississippi , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis 2010 compared to 2009 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2010 to 2009 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009 net revenue</td><td>$ 536.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>18.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other</td><td>-0.3 ( 0.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010 net revenue</td><td>$ 555.3</td></tr></table> the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 1046 gwh , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in billed electricity usage in all sectors , primarily due to the effect of more favorable weather on the residential sector . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 22 million in power management rider revenue as the result of higher rates , the volume/weather variance discussed above , and an increase in grand gulf rider revenue as a result of higher rates and increased usage , offset by a decrease of $ 23.5 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to lower fuel rates . fuel and purchased power expenses decreased primarily due to a decrease in deferred fuel expense as a result of prior over-collections , offset by an increase in the average market price of purchased power coupled with increased net area demand . other regulatory charges increased primarily due to increased recovery of costs associated with the power management recovery rider . other income statement variances 2011 compared to 2010 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : a $ 5.4 million decrease in compensation and benefits costs primarily resulting from an increase in the accrual for incentive-based compensation in 2010 and a decrease in stock option expense ; and the sale of $ 4.9 million of surplus oil inventory . the decrease was partially offset by an increase of $ 3.9 million in legal expenses due to the deferral in 2010 of certain litigation expenses in accordance with regulatory treatment . taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to an increase in ad valorem taxes due to a higher 2011 assessment as compared to 2010 , partially offset by higher capitalized property taxes as compared with prior year . depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to an increase in plant in service . interest expense decreased primarily due to a revision caused by ferc 2019s acceptance of a change in the treatment of funds received from independent power producers for transmission interconnection projects. .
Question: what is the effect of volume/weather in net revenue during 2010, in millions?
Answer: 18.9
Question: what about in full dollars?
Answer: 18900000.0
Question: what is the increases in the gwh of billed lectricity usage in all sectors?
| 1046.0 |
CONVFINQA_test528 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy mississippi , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis 2010 compared to 2009 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2010 to 2009 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009 net revenue</td><td>$ 536.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>18.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other</td><td>-0.3 ( 0.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010 net revenue</td><td>$ 555.3</td></tr></table> the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 1046 gwh , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in billed electricity usage in all sectors , primarily due to the effect of more favorable weather on the residential sector . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 22 million in power management rider revenue as the result of higher rates , the volume/weather variance discussed above , and an increase in grand gulf rider revenue as a result of higher rates and increased usage , offset by a decrease of $ 23.5 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to lower fuel rates . fuel and purchased power expenses decreased primarily due to a decrease in deferred fuel expense as a result of prior over-collections , offset by an increase in the average market price of purchased power coupled with increased net area demand . other regulatory charges increased primarily due to increased recovery of costs associated with the power management recovery rider . other income statement variances 2011 compared to 2010 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : a $ 5.4 million decrease in compensation and benefits costs primarily resulting from an increase in the accrual for incentive-based compensation in 2010 and a decrease in stock option expense ; and the sale of $ 4.9 million of surplus oil inventory . the decrease was partially offset by an increase of $ 3.9 million in legal expenses due to the deferral in 2010 of certain litigation expenses in accordance with regulatory treatment . taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to an increase in ad valorem taxes due to a higher 2011 assessment as compared to 2010 , partially offset by higher capitalized property taxes as compared with prior year . depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to an increase in plant in service . interest expense decreased primarily due to a revision caused by ferc 2019s acceptance of a change in the treatment of funds received from independent power producers for transmission interconnection projects. .
Question: what is the effect of volume/weather in net revenue during 2010, in millions?
Answer: 18.9
Question: what about in full dollars?
Answer: 18900000.0
Question: what is the increases in the gwh of billed lectricity usage in all sectors?
Answer: 1046.0
Question: what is the revenue per gwh?
| 18068.83365 |
CONVFINQA_test529 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
for uncoated freesheet paper and market pulp announced at the end of 2009 become effective . input costs are expected to be higher due to wood supply constraints at the kwidzyn mill and annual tariff increases on energy in russia . planned main- tenance outage costs are expected to be about flat , while operating costs should be favorable . asian printing papers net sales were approx- imately $ 50 million in 2009 compared with approx- imately $ 20 million in both 2008 and 2007 . operating earnings increased slightly in 2009 compared with 2008 , but were less than $ 1 million in all periods . u.s . market pulp net sales in 2009 totaled $ 575 million compared with $ 750 million in 2008 and $ 655 million in 2007 . operating earnings in 2009 were $ 140 million ( a loss of $ 71 million excluding alter- native fuel mixture credits and plant closure costs ) compared with a loss of $ 156 million ( a loss of $ 33 million excluding costs associated with the perma- nent shutdown of the bastrop mill ) in 2008 and earn- ings of $ 78 million in 2007 . sales volumes in 2009 decreased from 2008 levels due to weaker global demand . average sales price realizations were significantly lower as the decline in demand resulted in significant price declines for market pulp and smaller declines in fluff pulp . input costs for wood , energy and chemicals decreased , and freight costs were significantly lower . mill operating costs were favorable across all mills , and planned maintenance downtime costs were lower . lack-of-order downtime in 2009 increased to approx- imately 540000 tons , including 480000 tons related to the permanent shutdown of our bastrop mill in the fourth quarter of 2008 , compared with 135000 tons in 2008 . in the first quarter of 2010 , sales volumes are expected to increase slightly , reflecting improving customer demand for fluff pulp , offset by slightly seasonally weaker demand for softwood and hard- wood pulp in china . average sales price realizations are expected to improve , reflecting the realization of previously announced sales price increases for fluff pulp , hardwood pulp and softwood pulp . input costs are expected to increase for wood , energy and chemicals , and freight costs may also increase . planned maintenance downtime costs will be higher , but operating costs should be about flat . consumer packaging demand and pricing for consumer packaging prod- ucts correlate closely with consumer spending and general economic activity . in addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of consumer packaging are raw material and energy costs , freight costs , manufacturing efficiency and product mix . consumer packaging net sales in 2009 decreased 4% ( 4 % ) compared with 2008 and increased 1% ( 1 % ) compared with 2007 . operating profits increased significantly compared with both 2008 and 2007 . excluding alternative fuel mixture credits and facility closure costs , 2009 operating profits were sig- nificantly higher than 2008 and 57% ( 57 % ) higher than 2007 . benefits from higher average sales price realizations ( $ 114 million ) , lower raw material and energy costs ( $ 114 million ) , lower freight costs ( $ 21 million ) , lower costs associated with the reorganiza- tion of the shorewood business ( $ 23 million ) , favor- able foreign exchange effects ( $ 14 million ) and other items ( $ 12 million ) were partially offset by lower sales volumes and increased lack-of-order downtime ( $ 145 million ) and costs associated with the perma- nent shutdown of the franklin mill ( $ 67 million ) . additionally , operating profits in 2009 included $ 330 million of alternative fuel mixture credits . consumer packaging in millions 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 3060</td><td>$ 3195</td><td>$ 3015</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>433</td><td>17</td><td>112</td></tr></table> north american consumer packaging net sales were $ 2.2 billion compared with $ 2.5 billion in 2008 and $ 2.4 billion in 2007 . operating earnings in 2009 were $ 343 million ( $ 87 million excluding alter- native fuel mixture credits and facility closure costs ) compared with $ 8 million ( $ 38 million excluding facility closure costs ) in 2008 and $ 70 million in 2007 . coated paperboard sales volumes were lower in 2009 compared with 2008 reflecting weaker market conditions . average sales price realizations were significantly higher , reflecting the full-year realization of price increases implemented in the second half of 2008 . raw material costs for wood , energy and chemicals were significantly lower in 2009 , while freight costs were also favorable . operating costs , however , were unfavorable and planned main- tenance downtime costs were higher . lack-of-order downtime increased to 300000 tons in 2009 from 15000 tons in 2008 due to weak demand . operating results in 2009 include income of $ 330 million for alternative fuel mixture credits and $ 67 million of expenses for shutdown costs for the franklin mill . foodservice sales volumes were lower in 2009 than in 2008 due to generally weak world-wide economic conditions . average sales price realizations were .
Question: what was the total of north american consumer packaging net sales in 2009, in millions?
| 2200.0 |
CONVFINQA_test530 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
for uncoated freesheet paper and market pulp announced at the end of 2009 become effective . input costs are expected to be higher due to wood supply constraints at the kwidzyn mill and annual tariff increases on energy in russia . planned main- tenance outage costs are expected to be about flat , while operating costs should be favorable . asian printing papers net sales were approx- imately $ 50 million in 2009 compared with approx- imately $ 20 million in both 2008 and 2007 . operating earnings increased slightly in 2009 compared with 2008 , but were less than $ 1 million in all periods . u.s . market pulp net sales in 2009 totaled $ 575 million compared with $ 750 million in 2008 and $ 655 million in 2007 . operating earnings in 2009 were $ 140 million ( a loss of $ 71 million excluding alter- native fuel mixture credits and plant closure costs ) compared with a loss of $ 156 million ( a loss of $ 33 million excluding costs associated with the perma- nent shutdown of the bastrop mill ) in 2008 and earn- ings of $ 78 million in 2007 . sales volumes in 2009 decreased from 2008 levels due to weaker global demand . average sales price realizations were significantly lower as the decline in demand resulted in significant price declines for market pulp and smaller declines in fluff pulp . input costs for wood , energy and chemicals decreased , and freight costs were significantly lower . mill operating costs were favorable across all mills , and planned maintenance downtime costs were lower . lack-of-order downtime in 2009 increased to approx- imately 540000 tons , including 480000 tons related to the permanent shutdown of our bastrop mill in the fourth quarter of 2008 , compared with 135000 tons in 2008 . in the first quarter of 2010 , sales volumes are expected to increase slightly , reflecting improving customer demand for fluff pulp , offset by slightly seasonally weaker demand for softwood and hard- wood pulp in china . average sales price realizations are expected to improve , reflecting the realization of previously announced sales price increases for fluff pulp , hardwood pulp and softwood pulp . input costs are expected to increase for wood , energy and chemicals , and freight costs may also increase . planned maintenance downtime costs will be higher , but operating costs should be about flat . consumer packaging demand and pricing for consumer packaging prod- ucts correlate closely with consumer spending and general economic activity . in addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of consumer packaging are raw material and energy costs , freight costs , manufacturing efficiency and product mix . consumer packaging net sales in 2009 decreased 4% ( 4 % ) compared with 2008 and increased 1% ( 1 % ) compared with 2007 . operating profits increased significantly compared with both 2008 and 2007 . excluding alternative fuel mixture credits and facility closure costs , 2009 operating profits were sig- nificantly higher than 2008 and 57% ( 57 % ) higher than 2007 . benefits from higher average sales price realizations ( $ 114 million ) , lower raw material and energy costs ( $ 114 million ) , lower freight costs ( $ 21 million ) , lower costs associated with the reorganiza- tion of the shorewood business ( $ 23 million ) , favor- able foreign exchange effects ( $ 14 million ) and other items ( $ 12 million ) were partially offset by lower sales volumes and increased lack-of-order downtime ( $ 145 million ) and costs associated with the perma- nent shutdown of the franklin mill ( $ 67 million ) . additionally , operating profits in 2009 included $ 330 million of alternative fuel mixture credits . consumer packaging in millions 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 3060</td><td>$ 3195</td><td>$ 3015</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>433</td><td>17</td><td>112</td></tr></table> north american consumer packaging net sales were $ 2.2 billion compared with $ 2.5 billion in 2008 and $ 2.4 billion in 2007 . operating earnings in 2009 were $ 343 million ( $ 87 million excluding alter- native fuel mixture credits and facility closure costs ) compared with $ 8 million ( $ 38 million excluding facility closure costs ) in 2008 and $ 70 million in 2007 . coated paperboard sales volumes were lower in 2009 compared with 2008 reflecting weaker market conditions . average sales price realizations were significantly higher , reflecting the full-year realization of price increases implemented in the second half of 2008 . raw material costs for wood , energy and chemicals were significantly lower in 2009 , while freight costs were also favorable . operating costs , however , were unfavorable and planned main- tenance downtime costs were higher . lack-of-order downtime increased to 300000 tons in 2009 from 15000 tons in 2008 due to weak demand . operating results in 2009 include income of $ 330 million for alternative fuel mixture credits and $ 67 million of expenses for shutdown costs for the franklin mill . foodservice sales volumes were lower in 2009 than in 2008 due to generally weak world-wide economic conditions . average sales price realizations were .
Question: what was the total of north american consumer packaging net sales in 2009, in millions?
Answer: 2200.0
Question: and how much does this total represent in relation to the total consumer packaging sales of that year, in percentage?
| 0.71895 |
CONVFINQA_test531 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
directors in advance for their review . in the event the cbot directors determine in their sole discretion that a proposed rule change will materially impair the business of cbot or the business opportunities of the holders of the cbot memberships , such change must be submitted to a committee comprised of three cbot directors and two cme directors ( as defined in our bylaws ) . in connection with these rights , our ability to take certain actions that we may deem to be in the best interests of the company and its shareholders , including actions relating to the operation of our open outcry trading facilities and certain pricing decisions , may be limited by the rights of our members . item 1b.unresolved staff comments not applicable . item 2 . properties our global headquarters are located in chicago , illinois at 20 south wacker drive . the following is a description of our key locations and facilities . location primary use owned/leased lease expiration approximate size ( in square feet ) ( 1 ) 20 south wacker drive , chicago , illinois global headquarters and office space leased 2022 ( 2 ) 490000 141 west jackson chicago , illinois chicago trading floor and office space owned n/a 1500000 ( 3 ) 550 west washington chicago , illinois office space leased 2023 225000 one north end new york , new york new york trading floor and office space mixed ( 4 ) 2069 500000 ( 5 ) 33 cannon street , london office space leased 2019 14000 ( 6 ) one new change , london office space leased 2026 40000 ( 7 ) annex data center chicagoland area business continuity leased 2014 100000 remote data center chicagoland area business continuity leased 2017 50000 data center 3 chicagoland area business continuity and co-location owned n/a 430000 ( 1 ) size represents the amount of space leased by us unless otherwise noted . ( 2 ) the initial lease expires in 2022 with two consecutive options to extend the term for seven and ten years , respectively . ( 3 ) we occupy approximately 425000 square feet of the 141 west jackson complex . ( 4 ) the one north end property is subject to a ground lease with the battery park city authority for the site of our new york offices and trading facility . in accordance with the terms of the lease , we are deemed to lease the building and its improvements from the landlord . we do not make lease payments to the landlord related to the building and we receive the financial benefit of the rental income . ( 5 ) we occupy approximately 350000 square feet of the one north end building . ( 6 ) we have a termination right effective in the first quarter of 2012 , which we intend to exercise in the first quarter of 2011 . ( 7 ) we expect to occupy the space at one new change in the second quarter of 2011 . we also lease global office space around the world and have also partnered with major global telecommunications carriers in connection with our telecommunications hubs whereby we place data cabinets within the carriers 2019 existing secured data centers . we believe our facilities are adequate for our current operations and that additional space can be obtained if needed . item 3 . legal proceedings see 201clegal matters 201d in note 18 . contingencies to the consolidated financial statements beginning on page 96 for cme group 2019s litigation disclosure which is incorporated herein by reference. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>location</td><td>primary use</td><td>owned/leased</td><td>lease expiration</td><td>approximate size ( in squarefeet ) ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>20south wacker drive chicagoillinois</td><td>global headquarters and office space</td><td>leased</td><td>2022 ( 2 )</td><td>490000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>141west jacksonchicago illinois</td><td>chicago trading floor and office space</td><td>owned</td><td>n/a</td><td>1500000 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>550west washingtonchicago illinois</td><td>office space</td><td>leased</td><td>2023</td><td>225000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>onenorth endnew york new york</td><td>new york trading floor and office space</td><td>mixed ( 4 )</td><td>2069</td><td>500000 ( 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>33cannon street london</td><td>office space</td><td>leased</td><td>2019</td><td>14000 ( 6 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>onenew change london</td><td>office space</td><td>leased</td><td>2026</td><td>40000 ( 7 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>annexdata centerchicagoland area</td><td>business continuity</td><td>leased</td><td>2014</td><td>100000</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>remotedata centerchicagoland area</td><td>business continuity</td><td>leased</td><td>2017</td><td>50000</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>datacenter 3chicagoland area</td><td>business continuity and co-location</td><td>owned</td><td>n/a</td><td>430000</td></tr></table> directors in advance for their review . in the event the cbot directors determine in their sole discretion that a proposed rule change will materially impair the business of cbot or the business opportunities of the holders of the cbot memberships , such change must be submitted to a committee comprised of three cbot directors and two cme directors ( as defined in our bylaws ) . in connection with these rights , our ability to take certain actions that we may deem to be in the best interests of the company and its shareholders , including actions relating to the operation of our open outcry trading facilities and certain pricing decisions , may be limited by the rights of our members . item 1b.unresolved staff comments not applicable . item 2 . properties our global headquarters are located in chicago , illinois at 20 south wacker drive . the following is a description of our key locations and facilities . location primary use owned/leased lease expiration approximate size ( in square feet ) ( 1 ) 20 south wacker drive , chicago , illinois global headquarters and office space leased 2022 ( 2 ) 490000 141 west jackson chicago , illinois chicago trading floor and office space owned n/a 1500000 ( 3 ) 550 west washington chicago , illinois office space leased 2023 225000 one north end new york , new york new york trading floor and office space mixed ( 4 ) 2069 500000 ( 5 ) 33 cannon street , london office space leased 2019 14000 ( 6 ) one new change , london office space leased 2026 40000 ( 7 ) annex data center chicagoland area business continuity leased 2014 100000 remote data center chicagoland area business continuity leased 2017 50000 data center 3 chicagoland area business continuity and co-location owned n/a 430000 ( 1 ) size represents the amount of space leased by us unless otherwise noted . ( 2 ) the initial lease expires in 2022 with two consecutive options to extend the term for seven and ten years , respectively . ( 3 ) we occupy approximately 425000 square feet of the 141 west jackson complex . ( 4 ) the one north end property is subject to a ground lease with the battery park city authority for the site of our new york offices and trading facility . in accordance with the terms of the lease , we are deemed to lease the building and its improvements from the landlord . we do not make lease payments to the landlord related to the building and we receive the financial benefit of the rental income . ( 5 ) we occupy approximately 350000 square feet of the one north end building . ( 6 ) we have a termination right effective in the first quarter of 2012 , which we intend to exercise in the first quarter of 2011 . ( 7 ) we expect to occupy the space at one new change in the second quarter of 2011 . we also lease global office space around the world and have also partnered with major global telecommunications carriers in connection with our telecommunications hubs whereby we place data cabinets within the carriers 2019 existing secured data centers . we believe our facilities are adequate for our current operations and that additional space can be obtained if needed . item 3 . legal proceedings see 201clegal matters 201d in note 18 . contingencies to the consolidated financial statements beginning on page 96 for cme group 2019s litigation disclosure which is incorporated herein by reference. .
Question: what year does the initial lease expire for the chicago headquarters?
| 2022.0 |
CONVFINQA_test532 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
directors in advance for their review . in the event the cbot directors determine in their sole discretion that a proposed rule change will materially impair the business of cbot or the business opportunities of the holders of the cbot memberships , such change must be submitted to a committee comprised of three cbot directors and two cme directors ( as defined in our bylaws ) . in connection with these rights , our ability to take certain actions that we may deem to be in the best interests of the company and its shareholders , including actions relating to the operation of our open outcry trading facilities and certain pricing decisions , may be limited by the rights of our members . item 1b.unresolved staff comments not applicable . item 2 . properties our global headquarters are located in chicago , illinois at 20 south wacker drive . the following is a description of our key locations and facilities . location primary use owned/leased lease expiration approximate size ( in square feet ) ( 1 ) 20 south wacker drive , chicago , illinois global headquarters and office space leased 2022 ( 2 ) 490000 141 west jackson chicago , illinois chicago trading floor and office space owned n/a 1500000 ( 3 ) 550 west washington chicago , illinois office space leased 2023 225000 one north end new york , new york new york trading floor and office space mixed ( 4 ) 2069 500000 ( 5 ) 33 cannon street , london office space leased 2019 14000 ( 6 ) one new change , london office space leased 2026 40000 ( 7 ) annex data center chicagoland area business continuity leased 2014 100000 remote data center chicagoland area business continuity leased 2017 50000 data center 3 chicagoland area business continuity and co-location owned n/a 430000 ( 1 ) size represents the amount of space leased by us unless otherwise noted . ( 2 ) the initial lease expires in 2022 with two consecutive options to extend the term for seven and ten years , respectively . ( 3 ) we occupy approximately 425000 square feet of the 141 west jackson complex . ( 4 ) the one north end property is subject to a ground lease with the battery park city authority for the site of our new york offices and trading facility . in accordance with the terms of the lease , we are deemed to lease the building and its improvements from the landlord . we do not make lease payments to the landlord related to the building and we receive the financial benefit of the rental income . ( 5 ) we occupy approximately 350000 square feet of the one north end building . ( 6 ) we have a termination right effective in the first quarter of 2012 , which we intend to exercise in the first quarter of 2011 . ( 7 ) we expect to occupy the space at one new change in the second quarter of 2011 . we also lease global office space around the world and have also partnered with major global telecommunications carriers in connection with our telecommunications hubs whereby we place data cabinets within the carriers 2019 existing secured data centers . we believe our facilities are adequate for our current operations and that additional space can be obtained if needed . item 3 . legal proceedings see 201clegal matters 201d in note 18 . contingencies to the consolidated financial statements beginning on page 96 for cme group 2019s litigation disclosure which is incorporated herein by reference. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>location</td><td>primary use</td><td>owned/leased</td><td>lease expiration</td><td>approximate size ( in squarefeet ) ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>20south wacker drive chicagoillinois</td><td>global headquarters and office space</td><td>leased</td><td>2022 ( 2 )</td><td>490000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>141west jacksonchicago illinois</td><td>chicago trading floor and office space</td><td>owned</td><td>n/a</td><td>1500000 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>550west washingtonchicago illinois</td><td>office space</td><td>leased</td><td>2023</td><td>225000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>onenorth endnew york new york</td><td>new york trading floor and office space</td><td>mixed ( 4 )</td><td>2069</td><td>500000 ( 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>33cannon street london</td><td>office space</td><td>leased</td><td>2019</td><td>14000 ( 6 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>onenew change london</td><td>office space</td><td>leased</td><td>2026</td><td>40000 ( 7 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>annexdata centerchicagoland area</td><td>business continuity</td><td>leased</td><td>2014</td><td>100000</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>remotedata centerchicagoland area</td><td>business continuity</td><td>leased</td><td>2017</td><td>50000</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>datacenter 3chicagoland area</td><td>business continuity and co-location</td><td>owned</td><td>n/a</td><td>430000</td></tr></table> directors in advance for their review . in the event the cbot directors determine in their sole discretion that a proposed rule change will materially impair the business of cbot or the business opportunities of the holders of the cbot memberships , such change must be submitted to a committee comprised of three cbot directors and two cme directors ( as defined in our bylaws ) . in connection with these rights , our ability to take certain actions that we may deem to be in the best interests of the company and its shareholders , including actions relating to the operation of our open outcry trading facilities and certain pricing decisions , may be limited by the rights of our members . item 1b.unresolved staff comments not applicable . item 2 . properties our global headquarters are located in chicago , illinois at 20 south wacker drive . the following is a description of our key locations and facilities . location primary use owned/leased lease expiration approximate size ( in square feet ) ( 1 ) 20 south wacker drive , chicago , illinois global headquarters and office space leased 2022 ( 2 ) 490000 141 west jackson chicago , illinois chicago trading floor and office space owned n/a 1500000 ( 3 ) 550 west washington chicago , illinois office space leased 2023 225000 one north end new york , new york new york trading floor and office space mixed ( 4 ) 2069 500000 ( 5 ) 33 cannon street , london office space leased 2019 14000 ( 6 ) one new change , london office space leased 2026 40000 ( 7 ) annex data center chicagoland area business continuity leased 2014 100000 remote data center chicagoland area business continuity leased 2017 50000 data center 3 chicagoland area business continuity and co-location owned n/a 430000 ( 1 ) size represents the amount of space leased by us unless otherwise noted . ( 2 ) the initial lease expires in 2022 with two consecutive options to extend the term for seven and ten years , respectively . ( 3 ) we occupy approximately 425000 square feet of the 141 west jackson complex . ( 4 ) the one north end property is subject to a ground lease with the battery park city authority for the site of our new york offices and trading facility . in accordance with the terms of the lease , we are deemed to lease the building and its improvements from the landlord . we do not make lease payments to the landlord related to the building and we receive the financial benefit of the rental income . ( 5 ) we occupy approximately 350000 square feet of the one north end building . ( 6 ) we have a termination right effective in the first quarter of 2012 , which we intend to exercise in the first quarter of 2011 . ( 7 ) we expect to occupy the space at one new change in the second quarter of 2011 . we also lease global office space around the world and have also partnered with major global telecommunications carriers in connection with our telecommunications hubs whereby we place data cabinets within the carriers 2019 existing secured data centers . we believe our facilities are adequate for our current operations and that additional space can be obtained if needed . item 3 . legal proceedings see 201clegal matters 201d in note 18 . contingencies to the consolidated financial statements beginning on page 96 for cme group 2019s litigation disclosure which is incorporated herein by reference. .
Question: what year does the initial lease expire for the chicago headquarters?
Answer: 2022.0
Question: what is that plus 9?
| 2031.0 |
CONVFINQA_test533 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
directors in advance for their review . in the event the cbot directors determine in their sole discretion that a proposed rule change will materially impair the business of cbot or the business opportunities of the holders of the cbot memberships , such change must be submitted to a committee comprised of three cbot directors and two cme directors ( as defined in our bylaws ) . in connection with these rights , our ability to take certain actions that we may deem to be in the best interests of the company and its shareholders , including actions relating to the operation of our open outcry trading facilities and certain pricing decisions , may be limited by the rights of our members . item 1b.unresolved staff comments not applicable . item 2 . properties our global headquarters are located in chicago , illinois at 20 south wacker drive . the following is a description of our key locations and facilities . location primary use owned/leased lease expiration approximate size ( in square feet ) ( 1 ) 20 south wacker drive , chicago , illinois global headquarters and office space leased 2022 ( 2 ) 490000 141 west jackson chicago , illinois chicago trading floor and office space owned n/a 1500000 ( 3 ) 550 west washington chicago , illinois office space leased 2023 225000 one north end new york , new york new york trading floor and office space mixed ( 4 ) 2069 500000 ( 5 ) 33 cannon street , london office space leased 2019 14000 ( 6 ) one new change , london office space leased 2026 40000 ( 7 ) annex data center chicagoland area business continuity leased 2014 100000 remote data center chicagoland area business continuity leased 2017 50000 data center 3 chicagoland area business continuity and co-location owned n/a 430000 ( 1 ) size represents the amount of space leased by us unless otherwise noted . ( 2 ) the initial lease expires in 2022 with two consecutive options to extend the term for seven and ten years , respectively . ( 3 ) we occupy approximately 425000 square feet of the 141 west jackson complex . ( 4 ) the one north end property is subject to a ground lease with the battery park city authority for the site of our new york offices and trading facility . in accordance with the terms of the lease , we are deemed to lease the building and its improvements from the landlord . we do not make lease payments to the landlord related to the building and we receive the financial benefit of the rental income . ( 5 ) we occupy approximately 350000 square feet of the one north end building . ( 6 ) we have a termination right effective in the first quarter of 2012 , which we intend to exercise in the first quarter of 2011 . ( 7 ) we expect to occupy the space at one new change in the second quarter of 2011 . we also lease global office space around the world and have also partnered with major global telecommunications carriers in connection with our telecommunications hubs whereby we place data cabinets within the carriers 2019 existing secured data centers . we believe our facilities are adequate for our current operations and that additional space can be obtained if needed . item 3 . legal proceedings see 201clegal matters 201d in note 18 . contingencies to the consolidated financial statements beginning on page 96 for cme group 2019s litigation disclosure which is incorporated herein by reference. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>location</td><td>primary use</td><td>owned/leased</td><td>lease expiration</td><td>approximate size ( in squarefeet ) ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>20south wacker drive chicagoillinois</td><td>global headquarters and office space</td><td>leased</td><td>2022 ( 2 )</td><td>490000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>141west jacksonchicago illinois</td><td>chicago trading floor and office space</td><td>owned</td><td>n/a</td><td>1500000 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>550west washingtonchicago illinois</td><td>office space</td><td>leased</td><td>2023</td><td>225000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>onenorth endnew york new york</td><td>new york trading floor and office space</td><td>mixed ( 4 )</td><td>2069</td><td>500000 ( 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>33cannon street london</td><td>office space</td><td>leased</td><td>2019</td><td>14000 ( 6 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>onenew change london</td><td>office space</td><td>leased</td><td>2026</td><td>40000 ( 7 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>annexdata centerchicagoland area</td><td>business continuity</td><td>leased</td><td>2014</td><td>100000</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>remotedata centerchicagoland area</td><td>business continuity</td><td>leased</td><td>2017</td><td>50000</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>datacenter 3chicagoland area</td><td>business continuity and co-location</td><td>owned</td><td>n/a</td><td>430000</td></tr></table> directors in advance for their review . in the event the cbot directors determine in their sole discretion that a proposed rule change will materially impair the business of cbot or the business opportunities of the holders of the cbot memberships , such change must be submitted to a committee comprised of three cbot directors and two cme directors ( as defined in our bylaws ) . in connection with these rights , our ability to take certain actions that we may deem to be in the best interests of the company and its shareholders , including actions relating to the operation of our open outcry trading facilities and certain pricing decisions , may be limited by the rights of our members . item 1b.unresolved staff comments not applicable . item 2 . properties our global headquarters are located in chicago , illinois at 20 south wacker drive . the following is a description of our key locations and facilities . location primary use owned/leased lease expiration approximate size ( in square feet ) ( 1 ) 20 south wacker drive , chicago , illinois global headquarters and office space leased 2022 ( 2 ) 490000 141 west jackson chicago , illinois chicago trading floor and office space owned n/a 1500000 ( 3 ) 550 west washington chicago , illinois office space leased 2023 225000 one north end new york , new york new york trading floor and office space mixed ( 4 ) 2069 500000 ( 5 ) 33 cannon street , london office space leased 2019 14000 ( 6 ) one new change , london office space leased 2026 40000 ( 7 ) annex data center chicagoland area business continuity leased 2014 100000 remote data center chicagoland area business continuity leased 2017 50000 data center 3 chicagoland area business continuity and co-location owned n/a 430000 ( 1 ) size represents the amount of space leased by us unless otherwise noted . ( 2 ) the initial lease expires in 2022 with two consecutive options to extend the term for seven and ten years , respectively . ( 3 ) we occupy approximately 425000 square feet of the 141 west jackson complex . ( 4 ) the one north end property is subject to a ground lease with the battery park city authority for the site of our new york offices and trading facility . in accordance with the terms of the lease , we are deemed to lease the building and its improvements from the landlord . we do not make lease payments to the landlord related to the building and we receive the financial benefit of the rental income . ( 5 ) we occupy approximately 350000 square feet of the one north end building . ( 6 ) we have a termination right effective in the first quarter of 2012 , which we intend to exercise in the first quarter of 2011 . ( 7 ) we expect to occupy the space at one new change in the second quarter of 2011 . we also lease global office space around the world and have also partnered with major global telecommunications carriers in connection with our telecommunications hubs whereby we place data cabinets within the carriers 2019 existing secured data centers . we believe our facilities are adequate for our current operations and that additional space can be obtained if needed . item 3 . legal proceedings see 201clegal matters 201d in note 18 . contingencies to the consolidated financial statements beginning on page 96 for cme group 2019s litigation disclosure which is incorporated herein by reference. .
Question: what year does the initial lease expire for the chicago headquarters?
Answer: 2022.0
Question: what is that plus 9?
Answer: 2031.0
Question: what is that value plus 10?
| 2041.0 |
CONVFINQA_test534 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part ii item 5 2014market for registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters market information . the common stock of the company is currently traded on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) under the symbol 2018 2018aes . 2019 2019 the following tables set forth the high and low sale prices for the common stock as reported by the nyse for the periods indicated . price range of common stock . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2002 first quarter</td><td>high $ 17.84</td><td>low $ 4.11</td><td>2001 first quarter</td><td>high $ 60.15</td><td>low $ 41.30</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>second quarter</td><td>9.17</td><td>3.55</td><td>second quarter</td><td>52.25</td><td>39.95</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>third quarter</td><td>4.61</td><td>1.56</td><td>third quarter</td><td>44.50</td><td>12.00</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fourth quarter</td><td>3.57</td><td>0.95</td><td>fourth quarter</td><td>17.80</td><td>11.60</td></tr></table> holders . as of march 3 , 2003 , there were 9663 record holders of the company 2019s common stock , par value $ 0.01 per share . dividends . under the terms of the company 2019s senior secured credit facilities entered into with a commercial bank syndicate , the company is not allowed to pay cash dividends . in addition , the company is precluded from paying cash dividends on its common stock under the terms of a guaranty to the utility customer in connection with the aes thames project in the event certain net worth and liquidity tests of the company are not met . the ability of the company 2019s project subsidiaries to declare and pay cash dividends to the company is subject to certain limitations in the project loans , governmental provisions and other agreements entered into by such project subsidiaries . securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans . see the information contained under the caption 2018 2018securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans 2019 2019 of the proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders of the registrant to be held on may 1 , 2003 , which information is incorporated herein by reference. .
Question: what was the variance in the price of shares in the first quarter of 2002?
| 13.73 |
CONVFINQA_test535 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part ii item 5 2014market for registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters market information . the common stock of the company is currently traded on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) under the symbol 2018 2018aes . 2019 2019 the following tables set forth the high and low sale prices for the common stock as reported by the nyse for the periods indicated . price range of common stock . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2002 first quarter</td><td>high $ 17.84</td><td>low $ 4.11</td><td>2001 first quarter</td><td>high $ 60.15</td><td>low $ 41.30</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>second quarter</td><td>9.17</td><td>3.55</td><td>second quarter</td><td>52.25</td><td>39.95</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>third quarter</td><td>4.61</td><td>1.56</td><td>third quarter</td><td>44.50</td><td>12.00</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fourth quarter</td><td>3.57</td><td>0.95</td><td>fourth quarter</td><td>17.80</td><td>11.60</td></tr></table> holders . as of march 3 , 2003 , there were 9663 record holders of the company 2019s common stock , par value $ 0.01 per share . dividends . under the terms of the company 2019s senior secured credit facilities entered into with a commercial bank syndicate , the company is not allowed to pay cash dividends . in addition , the company is precluded from paying cash dividends on its common stock under the terms of a guaranty to the utility customer in connection with the aes thames project in the event certain net worth and liquidity tests of the company are not met . the ability of the company 2019s project subsidiaries to declare and pay cash dividends to the company is subject to certain limitations in the project loans , governmental provisions and other agreements entered into by such project subsidiaries . securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans . see the information contained under the caption 2018 2018securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans 2019 2019 of the proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders of the registrant to be held on may 1 , 2003 , which information is incorporated herein by reference. .
Question: what was the variance in the price of shares in the first quarter of 2002?
Answer: 13.73
Question: and what was it in that same period in 2001?
| 18.85 |
CONVFINQA_test536 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part ii item 5 2014market for registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters market information . the common stock of the company is currently traded on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) under the symbol 2018 2018aes . 2019 2019 the following tables set forth the high and low sale prices for the common stock as reported by the nyse for the periods indicated . price range of common stock . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2002 first quarter</td><td>high $ 17.84</td><td>low $ 4.11</td><td>2001 first quarter</td><td>high $ 60.15</td><td>low $ 41.30</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>second quarter</td><td>9.17</td><td>3.55</td><td>second quarter</td><td>52.25</td><td>39.95</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>third quarter</td><td>4.61</td><td>1.56</td><td>third quarter</td><td>44.50</td><td>12.00</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fourth quarter</td><td>3.57</td><td>0.95</td><td>fourth quarter</td><td>17.80</td><td>11.60</td></tr></table> holders . as of march 3 , 2003 , there were 9663 record holders of the company 2019s common stock , par value $ 0.01 per share . dividends . under the terms of the company 2019s senior secured credit facilities entered into with a commercial bank syndicate , the company is not allowed to pay cash dividends . in addition , the company is precluded from paying cash dividends on its common stock under the terms of a guaranty to the utility customer in connection with the aes thames project in the event certain net worth and liquidity tests of the company are not met . the ability of the company 2019s project subsidiaries to declare and pay cash dividends to the company is subject to certain limitations in the project loans , governmental provisions and other agreements entered into by such project subsidiaries . securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans . see the information contained under the caption 2018 2018securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans 2019 2019 of the proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders of the registrant to be held on may 1 , 2003 , which information is incorporated herein by reference. .
Question: what was the variance in the price of shares in the first quarter of 2002?
Answer: 13.73
Question: and what was it in that same period in 2001?
Answer: 18.85
Question: which variance, then, was greater?
| no |
CONVFINQA_test537 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part ii item 5 2014market for registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters market information . the common stock of the company is currently traded on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) under the symbol 2018 2018aes . 2019 2019 the following tables set forth the high and low sale prices for the common stock as reported by the nyse for the periods indicated . price range of common stock . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2002 first quarter</td><td>high $ 17.84</td><td>low $ 4.11</td><td>2001 first quarter</td><td>high $ 60.15</td><td>low $ 41.30</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>second quarter</td><td>9.17</td><td>3.55</td><td>second quarter</td><td>52.25</td><td>39.95</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>third quarter</td><td>4.61</td><td>1.56</td><td>third quarter</td><td>44.50</td><td>12.00</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fourth quarter</td><td>3.57</td><td>0.95</td><td>fourth quarter</td><td>17.80</td><td>11.60</td></tr></table> holders . as of march 3 , 2003 , there were 9663 record holders of the company 2019s common stock , par value $ 0.01 per share . dividends . under the terms of the company 2019s senior secured credit facilities entered into with a commercial bank syndicate , the company is not allowed to pay cash dividends . in addition , the company is precluded from paying cash dividends on its common stock under the terms of a guaranty to the utility customer in connection with the aes thames project in the event certain net worth and liquidity tests of the company are not met . the ability of the company 2019s project subsidiaries to declare and pay cash dividends to the company is subject to certain limitations in the project loans , governmental provisions and other agreements entered into by such project subsidiaries . securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans . see the information contained under the caption 2018 2018securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans 2019 2019 of the proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders of the registrant to be held on may 1 , 2003 , which information is incorporated herein by reference. .
Question: what was the variance in the price of shares in the first quarter of 2002?
Answer: 13.73
Question: and what was it in that same period in 2001?
Answer: 18.85
Question: which variance, then, was greater?
Answer: no
Question: and in the second quarter of that year of 2002, what was the average share price?
| 6.36 |
CONVFINQA_test538 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
tissue pulp due to strong market demand , partic- ularly from asia . average sales price realizations improved significantly in 2007 , principally reflecting higher average prices for softwood , hardwood and fluff pulp . operating earnings in 2007 were $ 104 mil- lion compared with $ 48 million in 2006 and $ 37 mil- lion in 2005 . the benefits from higher sales price realizations were partially offset by increased input costs for energy , chemicals and freight . entering the first quarter of 2008 , demand for market pulp remains strong , and average sales price realiza- tions should increase slightly . however , input costs for energy , chemicals and freight are expected to be higher , and increased spending is anticipated for planned mill maintenance outages . industrial packaging demand for industrial packaging products is closely correlated with non-durable industrial goods pro- duction , as well as with demand for processed foods , poultry , meat and agricultural products . in addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of industrial packaging are raw material and energy costs , freight costs , manufacturing effi- ciency and product mix . industrial packaging net sales for 2007 increased 6% ( 6 % ) to $ 5.2 billion compared with $ 4.9 bil- lion in 2006 , and 13% ( 13 % ) compared with $ 4.6 billion in 2005 . operating profits in 2007 were 26% ( 26 % ) higher than in 2006 and more than double 2005 earnings . bene- fits from improved price realizations ( $ 147 million ) , sales volume increases net of increased lack of order downtime ( $ 3 million ) , a more favorable mix ( $ 31 million ) , strong mill and converting operations ( $ 33 million ) and other costs ( $ 47 million ) were partially offset by the effects of higher raw material costs ( $ 76 million ) and higher freight costs ( $ 18 million ) . in addition , a gain of $ 13 million was recognized in 2006 related to a sale of property in spain and costs of $ 52 million were incurred in 2007 related to the conversion of the paper machine at pensacola to production of lightweight linerboard . the segment took 165000 tons of downtime in 2007 which included 16000 tons of market-related downtime compared with 135000 tons of downtime in 2006 of which none was market-related . industrial packaging in millions 2007 2006 2005 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 5245</td><td>$ 4925</td><td>$ 4625</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>$ 501</td><td>$ 399</td><td>$ 219</td></tr></table> north american industrial packaging net sales for 2007 were $ 3.9 billion , compared with $ 3.7 billion in 2006 and $ 3.6 billion in 2005 . operating profits in 2007 were $ 407 million , up from $ 327 mil- lion in 2006 and $ 170 million in 2005 . containerboard shipments were higher in 2007 compared with 2006 , including production from the paper machine at pensacola that was converted to lightweight linerboard during 2007 . average sales price realizations were significantly higher than in 2006 reflecting price increases announced early in 2006 and in the third quarter of 2007 . margins improved reflecting stronger export demand . manu- facturing performance was strong , although costs associated with planned mill maintenance outages were higher due to timing of outages . raw material costs for wood , energy , chemicals and recycled fiber increased significantly . operating results for 2007 were also unfavorably impacted by $ 52 million of costs associated with the conversion and startup of the pensacola paper machine . u.s . converting sales volumes were slightly lower in 2007 compared with 2006 reflecting softer customer box demand . earnings improvement in 2007 bene- fited from the realization of box price increases announced in early 2006 and late 2007 . favorable manufacturing operations and higher sales prices for waste fiber more than offset significantly higher raw material and freight costs . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2008 , sales volumes are expected to increase slightly , and results should benefit from a full-quarter impact of the price increases announced in the third quarter of 2007 . however , additional mill maintenance outages are planned for the first quarter , and freight and input costs are expected to rise , particularly for wood and energy . manufacturing operations should be favorable compared with the fourth quarter . european industrial packaging net sales for 2007 were $ 1.1 billion , up from $ 1.0 billion in 2006 and $ 880 million in 2005 . sales volumes were about flat as early stronger demand in the industrial segment weakened in the second half of the year . operating profits in 2007 were $ 88 million compared with $ 69 million in 2006 and $ 53 million in 2005 . sales margins improved reflecting increased sales prices for boxes . conversion costs were favorable as the result of manufacturing improvement programs . entering the first quarter of 2008 , sales volumes should be strong seasonally across all regions as the winter fruit and vegetable season continues . profit margins , however , are expected to be somewhat lower. .
Question: in the year of 2007, what was the amount of the industrial packaging sales that was from europe, in millions?
| 1100.0 |
CONVFINQA_test539 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
tissue pulp due to strong market demand , partic- ularly from asia . average sales price realizations improved significantly in 2007 , principally reflecting higher average prices for softwood , hardwood and fluff pulp . operating earnings in 2007 were $ 104 mil- lion compared with $ 48 million in 2006 and $ 37 mil- lion in 2005 . the benefits from higher sales price realizations were partially offset by increased input costs for energy , chemicals and freight . entering the first quarter of 2008 , demand for market pulp remains strong , and average sales price realiza- tions should increase slightly . however , input costs for energy , chemicals and freight are expected to be higher , and increased spending is anticipated for planned mill maintenance outages . industrial packaging demand for industrial packaging products is closely correlated with non-durable industrial goods pro- duction , as well as with demand for processed foods , poultry , meat and agricultural products . in addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of industrial packaging are raw material and energy costs , freight costs , manufacturing effi- ciency and product mix . industrial packaging net sales for 2007 increased 6% ( 6 % ) to $ 5.2 billion compared with $ 4.9 bil- lion in 2006 , and 13% ( 13 % ) compared with $ 4.6 billion in 2005 . operating profits in 2007 were 26% ( 26 % ) higher than in 2006 and more than double 2005 earnings . bene- fits from improved price realizations ( $ 147 million ) , sales volume increases net of increased lack of order downtime ( $ 3 million ) , a more favorable mix ( $ 31 million ) , strong mill and converting operations ( $ 33 million ) and other costs ( $ 47 million ) were partially offset by the effects of higher raw material costs ( $ 76 million ) and higher freight costs ( $ 18 million ) . in addition , a gain of $ 13 million was recognized in 2006 related to a sale of property in spain and costs of $ 52 million were incurred in 2007 related to the conversion of the paper machine at pensacola to production of lightweight linerboard . the segment took 165000 tons of downtime in 2007 which included 16000 tons of market-related downtime compared with 135000 tons of downtime in 2006 of which none was market-related . industrial packaging in millions 2007 2006 2005 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 5245</td><td>$ 4925</td><td>$ 4625</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>$ 501</td><td>$ 399</td><td>$ 219</td></tr></table> north american industrial packaging net sales for 2007 were $ 3.9 billion , compared with $ 3.7 billion in 2006 and $ 3.6 billion in 2005 . operating profits in 2007 were $ 407 million , up from $ 327 mil- lion in 2006 and $ 170 million in 2005 . containerboard shipments were higher in 2007 compared with 2006 , including production from the paper machine at pensacola that was converted to lightweight linerboard during 2007 . average sales price realizations were significantly higher than in 2006 reflecting price increases announced early in 2006 and in the third quarter of 2007 . margins improved reflecting stronger export demand . manu- facturing performance was strong , although costs associated with planned mill maintenance outages were higher due to timing of outages . raw material costs for wood , energy , chemicals and recycled fiber increased significantly . operating results for 2007 were also unfavorably impacted by $ 52 million of costs associated with the conversion and startup of the pensacola paper machine . u.s . converting sales volumes were slightly lower in 2007 compared with 2006 reflecting softer customer box demand . earnings improvement in 2007 bene- fited from the realization of box price increases announced in early 2006 and late 2007 . favorable manufacturing operations and higher sales prices for waste fiber more than offset significantly higher raw material and freight costs . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2008 , sales volumes are expected to increase slightly , and results should benefit from a full-quarter impact of the price increases announced in the third quarter of 2007 . however , additional mill maintenance outages are planned for the first quarter , and freight and input costs are expected to rise , particularly for wood and energy . manufacturing operations should be favorable compared with the fourth quarter . european industrial packaging net sales for 2007 were $ 1.1 billion , up from $ 1.0 billion in 2006 and $ 880 million in 2005 . sales volumes were about flat as early stronger demand in the industrial segment weakened in the second half of the year . operating profits in 2007 were $ 88 million compared with $ 69 million in 2006 and $ 53 million in 2005 . sales margins improved reflecting increased sales prices for boxes . conversion costs were favorable as the result of manufacturing improvement programs . entering the first quarter of 2008 , sales volumes should be strong seasonally across all regions as the winter fruit and vegetable season continues . profit margins , however , are expected to be somewhat lower. .
Question: in the year of 2007, what was the amount of the industrial packaging sales that was from europe, in millions?
Answer: 1100.0
Question: and what was the total of those sales?
| 5245.0 |
CONVFINQA_test540 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
tissue pulp due to strong market demand , partic- ularly from asia . average sales price realizations improved significantly in 2007 , principally reflecting higher average prices for softwood , hardwood and fluff pulp . operating earnings in 2007 were $ 104 mil- lion compared with $ 48 million in 2006 and $ 37 mil- lion in 2005 . the benefits from higher sales price realizations were partially offset by increased input costs for energy , chemicals and freight . entering the first quarter of 2008 , demand for market pulp remains strong , and average sales price realiza- tions should increase slightly . however , input costs for energy , chemicals and freight are expected to be higher , and increased spending is anticipated for planned mill maintenance outages . industrial packaging demand for industrial packaging products is closely correlated with non-durable industrial goods pro- duction , as well as with demand for processed foods , poultry , meat and agricultural products . in addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of industrial packaging are raw material and energy costs , freight costs , manufacturing effi- ciency and product mix . industrial packaging net sales for 2007 increased 6% ( 6 % ) to $ 5.2 billion compared with $ 4.9 bil- lion in 2006 , and 13% ( 13 % ) compared with $ 4.6 billion in 2005 . operating profits in 2007 were 26% ( 26 % ) higher than in 2006 and more than double 2005 earnings . bene- fits from improved price realizations ( $ 147 million ) , sales volume increases net of increased lack of order downtime ( $ 3 million ) , a more favorable mix ( $ 31 million ) , strong mill and converting operations ( $ 33 million ) and other costs ( $ 47 million ) were partially offset by the effects of higher raw material costs ( $ 76 million ) and higher freight costs ( $ 18 million ) . in addition , a gain of $ 13 million was recognized in 2006 related to a sale of property in spain and costs of $ 52 million were incurred in 2007 related to the conversion of the paper machine at pensacola to production of lightweight linerboard . the segment took 165000 tons of downtime in 2007 which included 16000 tons of market-related downtime compared with 135000 tons of downtime in 2006 of which none was market-related . industrial packaging in millions 2007 2006 2005 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 5245</td><td>$ 4925</td><td>$ 4625</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>$ 501</td><td>$ 399</td><td>$ 219</td></tr></table> north american industrial packaging net sales for 2007 were $ 3.9 billion , compared with $ 3.7 billion in 2006 and $ 3.6 billion in 2005 . operating profits in 2007 were $ 407 million , up from $ 327 mil- lion in 2006 and $ 170 million in 2005 . containerboard shipments were higher in 2007 compared with 2006 , including production from the paper machine at pensacola that was converted to lightweight linerboard during 2007 . average sales price realizations were significantly higher than in 2006 reflecting price increases announced early in 2006 and in the third quarter of 2007 . margins improved reflecting stronger export demand . manu- facturing performance was strong , although costs associated with planned mill maintenance outages were higher due to timing of outages . raw material costs for wood , energy , chemicals and recycled fiber increased significantly . operating results for 2007 were also unfavorably impacted by $ 52 million of costs associated with the conversion and startup of the pensacola paper machine . u.s . converting sales volumes were slightly lower in 2007 compared with 2006 reflecting softer customer box demand . earnings improvement in 2007 bene- fited from the realization of box price increases announced in early 2006 and late 2007 . favorable manufacturing operations and higher sales prices for waste fiber more than offset significantly higher raw material and freight costs . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2008 , sales volumes are expected to increase slightly , and results should benefit from a full-quarter impact of the price increases announced in the third quarter of 2007 . however , additional mill maintenance outages are planned for the first quarter , and freight and input costs are expected to rise , particularly for wood and energy . manufacturing operations should be favorable compared with the fourth quarter . european industrial packaging net sales for 2007 were $ 1.1 billion , up from $ 1.0 billion in 2006 and $ 880 million in 2005 . sales volumes were about flat as early stronger demand in the industrial segment weakened in the second half of the year . operating profits in 2007 were $ 88 million compared with $ 69 million in 2006 and $ 53 million in 2005 . sales margins improved reflecting increased sales prices for boxes . conversion costs were favorable as the result of manufacturing improvement programs . entering the first quarter of 2008 , sales volumes should be strong seasonally across all regions as the winter fruit and vegetable season continues . profit margins , however , are expected to be somewhat lower. .
Question: in the year of 2007, what was the amount of the industrial packaging sales that was from europe, in millions?
Answer: 1100.0
Question: and what was the total of those sales?
Answer: 5245.0
Question: what percentage, then, of this total did that amount represent?
| 0.20972 |
CONVFINQA_test541 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
tissue pulp due to strong market demand , partic- ularly from asia . average sales price realizations improved significantly in 2007 , principally reflecting higher average prices for softwood , hardwood and fluff pulp . operating earnings in 2007 were $ 104 mil- lion compared with $ 48 million in 2006 and $ 37 mil- lion in 2005 . the benefits from higher sales price realizations were partially offset by increased input costs for energy , chemicals and freight . entering the first quarter of 2008 , demand for market pulp remains strong , and average sales price realiza- tions should increase slightly . however , input costs for energy , chemicals and freight are expected to be higher , and increased spending is anticipated for planned mill maintenance outages . industrial packaging demand for industrial packaging products is closely correlated with non-durable industrial goods pro- duction , as well as with demand for processed foods , poultry , meat and agricultural products . in addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of industrial packaging are raw material and energy costs , freight costs , manufacturing effi- ciency and product mix . industrial packaging net sales for 2007 increased 6% ( 6 % ) to $ 5.2 billion compared with $ 4.9 bil- lion in 2006 , and 13% ( 13 % ) compared with $ 4.6 billion in 2005 . operating profits in 2007 were 26% ( 26 % ) higher than in 2006 and more than double 2005 earnings . bene- fits from improved price realizations ( $ 147 million ) , sales volume increases net of increased lack of order downtime ( $ 3 million ) , a more favorable mix ( $ 31 million ) , strong mill and converting operations ( $ 33 million ) and other costs ( $ 47 million ) were partially offset by the effects of higher raw material costs ( $ 76 million ) and higher freight costs ( $ 18 million ) . in addition , a gain of $ 13 million was recognized in 2006 related to a sale of property in spain and costs of $ 52 million were incurred in 2007 related to the conversion of the paper machine at pensacola to production of lightweight linerboard . the segment took 165000 tons of downtime in 2007 which included 16000 tons of market-related downtime compared with 135000 tons of downtime in 2006 of which none was market-related . industrial packaging in millions 2007 2006 2005 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 5245</td><td>$ 4925</td><td>$ 4625</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>$ 501</td><td>$ 399</td><td>$ 219</td></tr></table> north american industrial packaging net sales for 2007 were $ 3.9 billion , compared with $ 3.7 billion in 2006 and $ 3.6 billion in 2005 . operating profits in 2007 were $ 407 million , up from $ 327 mil- lion in 2006 and $ 170 million in 2005 . containerboard shipments were higher in 2007 compared with 2006 , including production from the paper machine at pensacola that was converted to lightweight linerboard during 2007 . average sales price realizations were significantly higher than in 2006 reflecting price increases announced early in 2006 and in the third quarter of 2007 . margins improved reflecting stronger export demand . manu- facturing performance was strong , although costs associated with planned mill maintenance outages were higher due to timing of outages . raw material costs for wood , energy , chemicals and recycled fiber increased significantly . operating results for 2007 were also unfavorably impacted by $ 52 million of costs associated with the conversion and startup of the pensacola paper machine . u.s . converting sales volumes were slightly lower in 2007 compared with 2006 reflecting softer customer box demand . earnings improvement in 2007 bene- fited from the realization of box price increases announced in early 2006 and late 2007 . favorable manufacturing operations and higher sales prices for waste fiber more than offset significantly higher raw material and freight costs . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2008 , sales volumes are expected to increase slightly , and results should benefit from a full-quarter impact of the price increases announced in the third quarter of 2007 . however , additional mill maintenance outages are planned for the first quarter , and freight and input costs are expected to rise , particularly for wood and energy . manufacturing operations should be favorable compared with the fourth quarter . european industrial packaging net sales for 2007 were $ 1.1 billion , up from $ 1.0 billion in 2006 and $ 880 million in 2005 . sales volumes were about flat as early stronger demand in the industrial segment weakened in the second half of the year . operating profits in 2007 were $ 88 million compared with $ 69 million in 2006 and $ 53 million in 2005 . sales margins improved reflecting increased sales prices for boxes . conversion costs were favorable as the result of manufacturing improvement programs . entering the first quarter of 2008 , sales volumes should be strong seasonally across all regions as the winter fruit and vegetable season continues . profit margins , however , are expected to be somewhat lower. .
Question: in the year of 2007, what was the amount of the industrial packaging sales that was from europe, in millions?
Answer: 1100.0
Question: and what was the total of those sales?
Answer: 5245.0
Question: what percentage, then, of this total did that amount represent?
Answer: 0.20972
Question: and what was this percentage in the previous year, in 2006?
| 0.20305 |
CONVFINQA_test542 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
38 2013 ppg annual report and form 10-k notes to the consolidated financial statements 1 . summary of significant accounting policies principles of consolidation the accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of ppg industries , inc . ( 201cppg 201d or the 201ccompany 201d ) and all subsidiaries , both u.s . and non-u.s. , that it controls . ppg owns more than 50% ( 50 % ) of the voting stock of most of the subsidiaries that it controls . for those consolidated subsidiaries in which the company 2019s ownership is less than 100% ( 100 % ) , the outside shareholders 2019 interests are shown as noncontrolling interests . investments in companies in which ppg owns 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) of the voting stock and has the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies of the investee are accounted for using the equity method of accounting . as a result , ppg 2019s share of the earnings or losses of such equity affiliates is included in the accompanying consolidated statement of income and ppg 2019s share of these companies 2019 shareholders 2019 equity is included in "investments" in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet . transactions between ppg and its subsidiaries are eliminated in consolidation . use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements the preparation of financial statements in conformity with u.s . generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements , as well as the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period . such estimates also include the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as a result of allocations of purchase price of business combinations consummated . actual outcomes could differ from those estimates . revenue recognition the company recognizes revenue when the earnings process is complete . revenue from sales is recognized by all operating segments when goods are shipped and title to inventory and risk of loss passes to the customer or when services have been rendered . shipping and handling costs amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling are reported in 201cnet sales 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income . shipping and handling costs incurred by the company for the delivery of goods to customers are included in 201ccost of sales , exclusive of depreciation and amortization 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income . selling , general and administrative costs amounts presented as 201cselling , general and administrative 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income are comprised of selling , customer service , distribution and advertising costs , as well as the costs of providing corporate- wide functional support in such areas as finance , law , human resources and planning . distribution costs pertain to the movement and storage of finished goods inventory at company- owned and leased warehouses , terminals and other distribution facilities . advertising costs advertising costs are expensed in the year incurred and totaled $ 345 million , $ 288 million and $ 245 million in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . research and development research and development costs , which consist primarily of employee related costs , are charged to expense as incurred . the following are the research and development costs for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>research and development 2013 total</td><td>$ 505</td><td>$ 468</td><td>$ 443</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less depreciation on research facilities</td><td>17</td><td>15</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>research and development net</td><td>$ 488</td><td>$ 453</td><td>$ 428</td></tr></table> legal costs legal costs are expensed as incurred . legal costs incurred by ppg include legal costs associated with acquisition and divestiture transactions , general litigation , environmental regulation compliance , patent and trademark protection and other general corporate purposes . foreign currency translation the functional currency of most significant non-u.s . operations is their local currency . assets and liabilities of those operations are translated into u.s . dollars using year-end exchange rates ; income and expenses are translated using the average exchange rates for the reporting period . unrealized foreign currency translation adjustments are deferred in accumulated other comprehensive loss , a separate component of shareholders 2019 equity . cash equivalents cash equivalents are highly liquid investments ( valued at cost , which approximates fair value ) acquired with an original maturity of three months or less . short-term investments short-term investments are highly liquid , high credit quality investments ( valued at cost plus accrued interest ) that have stated maturities of greater than three months to one year . the purchases and sales of these investments are classified as investing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows . marketable equity securities the company 2019s investment in marketable equity securities is recorded at fair market value and reported in 201cother current assets 201d and 201cinvestments 201d in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet with changes in fair market value recorded in income for those securities designated as trading securities and in other comprehensive income , net of tax , for those designated as available for sale securities. .
Question: what was the research and development net in 2013?
| 488.0 |
CONVFINQA_test543 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
38 2013 ppg annual report and form 10-k notes to the consolidated financial statements 1 . summary of significant accounting policies principles of consolidation the accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of ppg industries , inc . ( 201cppg 201d or the 201ccompany 201d ) and all subsidiaries , both u.s . and non-u.s. , that it controls . ppg owns more than 50% ( 50 % ) of the voting stock of most of the subsidiaries that it controls . for those consolidated subsidiaries in which the company 2019s ownership is less than 100% ( 100 % ) , the outside shareholders 2019 interests are shown as noncontrolling interests . investments in companies in which ppg owns 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) of the voting stock and has the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies of the investee are accounted for using the equity method of accounting . as a result , ppg 2019s share of the earnings or losses of such equity affiliates is included in the accompanying consolidated statement of income and ppg 2019s share of these companies 2019 shareholders 2019 equity is included in "investments" in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet . transactions between ppg and its subsidiaries are eliminated in consolidation . use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements the preparation of financial statements in conformity with u.s . generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements , as well as the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period . such estimates also include the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as a result of allocations of purchase price of business combinations consummated . actual outcomes could differ from those estimates . revenue recognition the company recognizes revenue when the earnings process is complete . revenue from sales is recognized by all operating segments when goods are shipped and title to inventory and risk of loss passes to the customer or when services have been rendered . shipping and handling costs amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling are reported in 201cnet sales 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income . shipping and handling costs incurred by the company for the delivery of goods to customers are included in 201ccost of sales , exclusive of depreciation and amortization 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income . selling , general and administrative costs amounts presented as 201cselling , general and administrative 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income are comprised of selling , customer service , distribution and advertising costs , as well as the costs of providing corporate- wide functional support in such areas as finance , law , human resources and planning . distribution costs pertain to the movement and storage of finished goods inventory at company- owned and leased warehouses , terminals and other distribution facilities . advertising costs advertising costs are expensed in the year incurred and totaled $ 345 million , $ 288 million and $ 245 million in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . research and development research and development costs , which consist primarily of employee related costs , are charged to expense as incurred . the following are the research and development costs for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>research and development 2013 total</td><td>$ 505</td><td>$ 468</td><td>$ 443</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less depreciation on research facilities</td><td>17</td><td>15</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>research and development net</td><td>$ 488</td><td>$ 453</td><td>$ 428</td></tr></table> legal costs legal costs are expensed as incurred . legal costs incurred by ppg include legal costs associated with acquisition and divestiture transactions , general litigation , environmental regulation compliance , patent and trademark protection and other general corporate purposes . foreign currency translation the functional currency of most significant non-u.s . operations is their local currency . assets and liabilities of those operations are translated into u.s . dollars using year-end exchange rates ; income and expenses are translated using the average exchange rates for the reporting period . unrealized foreign currency translation adjustments are deferred in accumulated other comprehensive loss , a separate component of shareholders 2019 equity . cash equivalents cash equivalents are highly liquid investments ( valued at cost , which approximates fair value ) acquired with an original maturity of three months or less . short-term investments short-term investments are highly liquid , high credit quality investments ( valued at cost plus accrued interest ) that have stated maturities of greater than three months to one year . the purchases and sales of these investments are classified as investing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows . marketable equity securities the company 2019s investment in marketable equity securities is recorded at fair market value and reported in 201cother current assets 201d and 201cinvestments 201d in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet with changes in fair market value recorded in income for those securities designated as trading securities and in other comprehensive income , net of tax , for those designated as available for sale securities. .
Question: what was the research and development net in 2013?
Answer: 488.0
Question: and for 2012?
| 453.0 |
CONVFINQA_test544 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
38 2013 ppg annual report and form 10-k notes to the consolidated financial statements 1 . summary of significant accounting policies principles of consolidation the accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of ppg industries , inc . ( 201cppg 201d or the 201ccompany 201d ) and all subsidiaries , both u.s . and non-u.s. , that it controls . ppg owns more than 50% ( 50 % ) of the voting stock of most of the subsidiaries that it controls . for those consolidated subsidiaries in which the company 2019s ownership is less than 100% ( 100 % ) , the outside shareholders 2019 interests are shown as noncontrolling interests . investments in companies in which ppg owns 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) of the voting stock and has the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies of the investee are accounted for using the equity method of accounting . as a result , ppg 2019s share of the earnings or losses of such equity affiliates is included in the accompanying consolidated statement of income and ppg 2019s share of these companies 2019 shareholders 2019 equity is included in "investments" in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet . transactions between ppg and its subsidiaries are eliminated in consolidation . use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements the preparation of financial statements in conformity with u.s . generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements , as well as the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period . such estimates also include the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as a result of allocations of purchase price of business combinations consummated . actual outcomes could differ from those estimates . revenue recognition the company recognizes revenue when the earnings process is complete . revenue from sales is recognized by all operating segments when goods are shipped and title to inventory and risk of loss passes to the customer or when services have been rendered . shipping and handling costs amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling are reported in 201cnet sales 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income . shipping and handling costs incurred by the company for the delivery of goods to customers are included in 201ccost of sales , exclusive of depreciation and amortization 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income . selling , general and administrative costs amounts presented as 201cselling , general and administrative 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income are comprised of selling , customer service , distribution and advertising costs , as well as the costs of providing corporate- wide functional support in such areas as finance , law , human resources and planning . distribution costs pertain to the movement and storage of finished goods inventory at company- owned and leased warehouses , terminals and other distribution facilities . advertising costs advertising costs are expensed in the year incurred and totaled $ 345 million , $ 288 million and $ 245 million in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . research and development research and development costs , which consist primarily of employee related costs , are charged to expense as incurred . the following are the research and development costs for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>research and development 2013 total</td><td>$ 505</td><td>$ 468</td><td>$ 443</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less depreciation on research facilities</td><td>17</td><td>15</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>research and development net</td><td>$ 488</td><td>$ 453</td><td>$ 428</td></tr></table> legal costs legal costs are expensed as incurred . legal costs incurred by ppg include legal costs associated with acquisition and divestiture transactions , general litigation , environmental regulation compliance , patent and trademark protection and other general corporate purposes . foreign currency translation the functional currency of most significant non-u.s . operations is their local currency . assets and liabilities of those operations are translated into u.s . dollars using year-end exchange rates ; income and expenses are translated using the average exchange rates for the reporting period . unrealized foreign currency translation adjustments are deferred in accumulated other comprehensive loss , a separate component of shareholders 2019 equity . cash equivalents cash equivalents are highly liquid investments ( valued at cost , which approximates fair value ) acquired with an original maturity of three months or less . short-term investments short-term investments are highly liquid , high credit quality investments ( valued at cost plus accrued interest ) that have stated maturities of greater than three months to one year . the purchases and sales of these investments are classified as investing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows . marketable equity securities the company 2019s investment in marketable equity securities is recorded at fair market value and reported in 201cother current assets 201d and 201cinvestments 201d in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet with changes in fair market value recorded in income for those securities designated as trading securities and in other comprehensive income , net of tax , for those designated as available for sale securities. .
Question: what was the research and development net in 2013?
Answer: 488.0
Question: and for 2012?
Answer: 453.0
Question: so what was the difference between these two years?
| 35.0 |
CONVFINQA_test545 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
38 2013 ppg annual report and form 10-k notes to the consolidated financial statements 1 . summary of significant accounting policies principles of consolidation the accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of ppg industries , inc . ( 201cppg 201d or the 201ccompany 201d ) and all subsidiaries , both u.s . and non-u.s. , that it controls . ppg owns more than 50% ( 50 % ) of the voting stock of most of the subsidiaries that it controls . for those consolidated subsidiaries in which the company 2019s ownership is less than 100% ( 100 % ) , the outside shareholders 2019 interests are shown as noncontrolling interests . investments in companies in which ppg owns 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) of the voting stock and has the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies of the investee are accounted for using the equity method of accounting . as a result , ppg 2019s share of the earnings or losses of such equity affiliates is included in the accompanying consolidated statement of income and ppg 2019s share of these companies 2019 shareholders 2019 equity is included in "investments" in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet . transactions between ppg and its subsidiaries are eliminated in consolidation . use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements the preparation of financial statements in conformity with u.s . generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements , as well as the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period . such estimates also include the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as a result of allocations of purchase price of business combinations consummated . actual outcomes could differ from those estimates . revenue recognition the company recognizes revenue when the earnings process is complete . revenue from sales is recognized by all operating segments when goods are shipped and title to inventory and risk of loss passes to the customer or when services have been rendered . shipping and handling costs amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling are reported in 201cnet sales 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income . shipping and handling costs incurred by the company for the delivery of goods to customers are included in 201ccost of sales , exclusive of depreciation and amortization 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income . selling , general and administrative costs amounts presented as 201cselling , general and administrative 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income are comprised of selling , customer service , distribution and advertising costs , as well as the costs of providing corporate- wide functional support in such areas as finance , law , human resources and planning . distribution costs pertain to the movement and storage of finished goods inventory at company- owned and leased warehouses , terminals and other distribution facilities . advertising costs advertising costs are expensed in the year incurred and totaled $ 345 million , $ 288 million and $ 245 million in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . research and development research and development costs , which consist primarily of employee related costs , are charged to expense as incurred . the following are the research and development costs for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>research and development 2013 total</td><td>$ 505</td><td>$ 468</td><td>$ 443</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less depreciation on research facilities</td><td>17</td><td>15</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>research and development net</td><td>$ 488</td><td>$ 453</td><td>$ 428</td></tr></table> legal costs legal costs are expensed as incurred . legal costs incurred by ppg include legal costs associated with acquisition and divestiture transactions , general litigation , environmental regulation compliance , patent and trademark protection and other general corporate purposes . foreign currency translation the functional currency of most significant non-u.s . operations is their local currency . assets and liabilities of those operations are translated into u.s . dollars using year-end exchange rates ; income and expenses are translated using the average exchange rates for the reporting period . unrealized foreign currency translation adjustments are deferred in accumulated other comprehensive loss , a separate component of shareholders 2019 equity . cash equivalents cash equivalents are highly liquid investments ( valued at cost , which approximates fair value ) acquired with an original maturity of three months or less . short-term investments short-term investments are highly liquid , high credit quality investments ( valued at cost plus accrued interest ) that have stated maturities of greater than three months to one year . the purchases and sales of these investments are classified as investing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows . marketable equity securities the company 2019s investment in marketable equity securities is recorded at fair market value and reported in 201cother current assets 201d and 201cinvestments 201d in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet with changes in fair market value recorded in income for those securities designated as trading securities and in other comprehensive income , net of tax , for those designated as available for sale securities. .
Question: what was the research and development net in 2013?
Answer: 488.0
Question: and for 2012?
Answer: 453.0
Question: so what was the difference between these two years?
Answer: 35.0
Question: and the percentage change during this time?
| 0.07726 |
CONVFINQA_test546 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
53management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations in order to borrow funds under the 5-year credit facility , the company must be in compliance with various conditions , covenants and representations contained in the agreements . the company was in compliance with the terms of the 5-year credit facility at december 31 , 2006 . the company has never borrowed under its domestic revolving credit facilities . utilization of the non-u.s . credit facilities may also be dependent on the company's ability to meet certain conditions at the time a borrowing is requested . contractual obligations , guarantees , and other purchase commitments contractual obligations summarized in the table below are the company's obligations and commitments to make future payments under debt obligations ( assuming earliest possible exercise of put rights by holders ) , lease payment obligations , and purchase obligations as of december 31 , 2006 . payments due by period ( 1 ) ( in millions ) total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 thereafter . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) total</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) 2007</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) 2008</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) 2009</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) 2010</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) 2011</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt obligations</td><td>$ 4134</td><td>$ 1340</td><td>$ 198</td><td>$ 4</td><td>$ 534</td><td>$ 607</td><td>$ 1451</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>lease obligations</td><td>2328</td><td>351</td><td>281</td><td>209</td><td>178</td><td>158</td><td>1151</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchase obligations</td><td>1035</td><td>326</td><td>120</td><td>26</td><td>12</td><td>12</td><td>539</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total contractual obligations</td><td>$ 7497</td><td>$ 2017</td><td>$ 599</td><td>$ 239</td><td>$ 724</td><td>$ 777</td><td>$ 3141</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) amounts included represent firm , non-cancelable commitments . debt obligations : at december 31 , 2006 , the company's long-term debt obligations , including current maturities and unamortized discount and issue costs , totaled $ 4.1 billion , as compared to $ 4.0 billion at december 31 , 2005 . a table of all outstanding long-term debt securities can be found in note 4 , ""debt and credit facilities'' to the company's consolidated financial statements . lease obligations : the company owns most of its major facilities , but does lease certain office , factory and warehouse space , land , and information technology and other equipment under principally non-cancelable operating leases . at december 31 , 2006 , future minimum lease obligations , net of minimum sublease rentals , totaled $ 2.3 billion . rental expense , net of sublease income , was $ 241 million in 2006 , $ 250 million in 2005 and $ 205 million in 2004 . purchase obligations : the company has entered into agreements for the purchase of inventory , license of software , promotional agreements , and research and development agreements which are firm commitments and are not cancelable . the longest of these agreements extends through 2015 . total payments expected to be made under these agreements total $ 1.0 billion . commitments under other long-term agreements : the company has entered into certain long-term agreements to purchase software , components , supplies and materials from suppliers . most of the agreements extend for periods of one to three years ( three to five years for software ) . however , generally these agreements do not obligate the company to make any purchases , and many permit the company to terminate the agreement with advance notice ( usually ranging from 60 to 180 days ) . if the company were to terminate these agreements , it generally would be liable for certain termination charges , typically based on work performed and supplier on-hand inventory and raw materials attributable to canceled orders . the company's liability would only arise in the event it terminates the agreements for reasons other than ""cause.'' the company also enters into a number of arrangements for the sourcing of supplies and materials with minimum purchase commitments and take-or-pay obligations . the majority of the minimum purchase obligations under these contracts are over the life of the contract as opposed to a year-by-year take-or-pay . if these agreements were terminated at december 31 , 2006 , the company's obligation would not have been significant . the company does not anticipate the cancellation of any of these agreements in the future . subsequent to the end of 2006 , the company entered into take-or-pay arrangements with suppliers through may 2009 with minimum purchase obligations of $ 2.2 billion during that period . the company estimates purchases during that period that exceed the minimum obligations . the company outsources certain corporate functions , such as benefit administration and information technology-related services . these contracts are expected to expire in 2013 . the total remaining payments under these contracts are approximately $ 1.3 billion over the remaining seven years ; however , these contracts can be %%transmsg*** transmitting job : c11830 pcn : 055000000 *** %%pcmsg| |00030|yes|no|02/28/2007 13:05|0|1|page is valid , no graphics -- color : n| .
Question: what was the long-term debt in 2011?
| 1340.0 |
CONVFINQA_test547 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
53management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations in order to borrow funds under the 5-year credit facility , the company must be in compliance with various conditions , covenants and representations contained in the agreements . the company was in compliance with the terms of the 5-year credit facility at december 31 , 2006 . the company has never borrowed under its domestic revolving credit facilities . utilization of the non-u.s . credit facilities may also be dependent on the company's ability to meet certain conditions at the time a borrowing is requested . contractual obligations , guarantees , and other purchase commitments contractual obligations summarized in the table below are the company's obligations and commitments to make future payments under debt obligations ( assuming earliest possible exercise of put rights by holders ) , lease payment obligations , and purchase obligations as of december 31 , 2006 . payments due by period ( 1 ) ( in millions ) total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 thereafter . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) total</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) 2007</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) 2008</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) 2009</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) 2010</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) 2011</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt obligations</td><td>$ 4134</td><td>$ 1340</td><td>$ 198</td><td>$ 4</td><td>$ 534</td><td>$ 607</td><td>$ 1451</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>lease obligations</td><td>2328</td><td>351</td><td>281</td><td>209</td><td>178</td><td>158</td><td>1151</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchase obligations</td><td>1035</td><td>326</td><td>120</td><td>26</td><td>12</td><td>12</td><td>539</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total contractual obligations</td><td>$ 7497</td><td>$ 2017</td><td>$ 599</td><td>$ 239</td><td>$ 724</td><td>$ 777</td><td>$ 3141</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) amounts included represent firm , non-cancelable commitments . debt obligations : at december 31 , 2006 , the company's long-term debt obligations , including current maturities and unamortized discount and issue costs , totaled $ 4.1 billion , as compared to $ 4.0 billion at december 31 , 2005 . a table of all outstanding long-term debt securities can be found in note 4 , ""debt and credit facilities'' to the company's consolidated financial statements . lease obligations : the company owns most of its major facilities , but does lease certain office , factory and warehouse space , land , and information technology and other equipment under principally non-cancelable operating leases . at december 31 , 2006 , future minimum lease obligations , net of minimum sublease rentals , totaled $ 2.3 billion . rental expense , net of sublease income , was $ 241 million in 2006 , $ 250 million in 2005 and $ 205 million in 2004 . purchase obligations : the company has entered into agreements for the purchase of inventory , license of software , promotional agreements , and research and development agreements which are firm commitments and are not cancelable . the longest of these agreements extends through 2015 . total payments expected to be made under these agreements total $ 1.0 billion . commitments under other long-term agreements : the company has entered into certain long-term agreements to purchase software , components , supplies and materials from suppliers . most of the agreements extend for periods of one to three years ( three to five years for software ) . however , generally these agreements do not obligate the company to make any purchases , and many permit the company to terminate the agreement with advance notice ( usually ranging from 60 to 180 days ) . if the company were to terminate these agreements , it generally would be liable for certain termination charges , typically based on work performed and supplier on-hand inventory and raw materials attributable to canceled orders . the company's liability would only arise in the event it terminates the agreements for reasons other than ""cause.'' the company also enters into a number of arrangements for the sourcing of supplies and materials with minimum purchase commitments and take-or-pay obligations . the majority of the minimum purchase obligations under these contracts are over the life of the contract as opposed to a year-by-year take-or-pay . if these agreements were terminated at december 31 , 2006 , the company's obligation would not have been significant . the company does not anticipate the cancellation of any of these agreements in the future . subsequent to the end of 2006 , the company entered into take-or-pay arrangements with suppliers through may 2009 with minimum purchase obligations of $ 2.2 billion during that period . the company estimates purchases during that period that exceed the minimum obligations . the company outsources certain corporate functions , such as benefit administration and information technology-related services . these contracts are expected to expire in 2013 . the total remaining payments under these contracts are approximately $ 1.3 billion over the remaining seven years ; however , these contracts can be %%transmsg*** transmitting job : c11830 pcn : 055000000 *** %%pcmsg| |00030|yes|no|02/28/2007 13:05|0|1|page is valid , no graphics -- color : n| .
Question: what was the long-term debt in 2011?
Answer: 1340.0
Question: and what was it in 2007?
| 607.0 |
CONVFINQA_test548 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
53management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations in order to borrow funds under the 5-year credit facility , the company must be in compliance with various conditions , covenants and representations contained in the agreements . the company was in compliance with the terms of the 5-year credit facility at december 31 , 2006 . the company has never borrowed under its domestic revolving credit facilities . utilization of the non-u.s . credit facilities may also be dependent on the company's ability to meet certain conditions at the time a borrowing is requested . contractual obligations , guarantees , and other purchase commitments contractual obligations summarized in the table below are the company's obligations and commitments to make future payments under debt obligations ( assuming earliest possible exercise of put rights by holders ) , lease payment obligations , and purchase obligations as of december 31 , 2006 . payments due by period ( 1 ) ( in millions ) total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 thereafter . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) total</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) 2007</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) 2008</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) 2009</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) 2010</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) 2011</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt obligations</td><td>$ 4134</td><td>$ 1340</td><td>$ 198</td><td>$ 4</td><td>$ 534</td><td>$ 607</td><td>$ 1451</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>lease obligations</td><td>2328</td><td>351</td><td>281</td><td>209</td><td>178</td><td>158</td><td>1151</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchase obligations</td><td>1035</td><td>326</td><td>120</td><td>26</td><td>12</td><td>12</td><td>539</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total contractual obligations</td><td>$ 7497</td><td>$ 2017</td><td>$ 599</td><td>$ 239</td><td>$ 724</td><td>$ 777</td><td>$ 3141</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) amounts included represent firm , non-cancelable commitments . debt obligations : at december 31 , 2006 , the company's long-term debt obligations , including current maturities and unamortized discount and issue costs , totaled $ 4.1 billion , as compared to $ 4.0 billion at december 31 , 2005 . a table of all outstanding long-term debt securities can be found in note 4 , ""debt and credit facilities'' to the company's consolidated financial statements . lease obligations : the company owns most of its major facilities , but does lease certain office , factory and warehouse space , land , and information technology and other equipment under principally non-cancelable operating leases . at december 31 , 2006 , future minimum lease obligations , net of minimum sublease rentals , totaled $ 2.3 billion . rental expense , net of sublease income , was $ 241 million in 2006 , $ 250 million in 2005 and $ 205 million in 2004 . purchase obligations : the company has entered into agreements for the purchase of inventory , license of software , promotional agreements , and research and development agreements which are firm commitments and are not cancelable . the longest of these agreements extends through 2015 . total payments expected to be made under these agreements total $ 1.0 billion . commitments under other long-term agreements : the company has entered into certain long-term agreements to purchase software , components , supplies and materials from suppliers . most of the agreements extend for periods of one to three years ( three to five years for software ) . however , generally these agreements do not obligate the company to make any purchases , and many permit the company to terminate the agreement with advance notice ( usually ranging from 60 to 180 days ) . if the company were to terminate these agreements , it generally would be liable for certain termination charges , typically based on work performed and supplier on-hand inventory and raw materials attributable to canceled orders . the company's liability would only arise in the event it terminates the agreements for reasons other than ""cause.'' the company also enters into a number of arrangements for the sourcing of supplies and materials with minimum purchase commitments and take-or-pay obligations . the majority of the minimum purchase obligations under these contracts are over the life of the contract as opposed to a year-by-year take-or-pay . if these agreements were terminated at december 31 , 2006 , the company's obligation would not have been significant . the company does not anticipate the cancellation of any of these agreements in the future . subsequent to the end of 2006 , the company entered into take-or-pay arrangements with suppliers through may 2009 with minimum purchase obligations of $ 2.2 billion during that period . the company estimates purchases during that period that exceed the minimum obligations . the company outsources certain corporate functions , such as benefit administration and information technology-related services . these contracts are expected to expire in 2013 . the total remaining payments under these contracts are approximately $ 1.3 billion over the remaining seven years ; however , these contracts can be %%transmsg*** transmitting job : c11830 pcn : 055000000 *** %%pcmsg| |00030|yes|no|02/28/2007 13:05|0|1|page is valid , no graphics -- color : n| .
Question: what was the long-term debt in 2011?
Answer: 1340.0
Question: and what was it in 2007?
Answer: 607.0
Question: by how much, then, did it vary over the years?
| 733.0 |
CONVFINQA_test549 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
53management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations in order to borrow funds under the 5-year credit facility , the company must be in compliance with various conditions , covenants and representations contained in the agreements . the company was in compliance with the terms of the 5-year credit facility at december 31 , 2006 . the company has never borrowed under its domestic revolving credit facilities . utilization of the non-u.s . credit facilities may also be dependent on the company's ability to meet certain conditions at the time a borrowing is requested . contractual obligations , guarantees , and other purchase commitments contractual obligations summarized in the table below are the company's obligations and commitments to make future payments under debt obligations ( assuming earliest possible exercise of put rights by holders ) , lease payment obligations , and purchase obligations as of december 31 , 2006 . payments due by period ( 1 ) ( in millions ) total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 thereafter . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) total</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) 2007</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) 2008</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) 2009</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) 2010</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) 2011</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt obligations</td><td>$ 4134</td><td>$ 1340</td><td>$ 198</td><td>$ 4</td><td>$ 534</td><td>$ 607</td><td>$ 1451</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>lease obligations</td><td>2328</td><td>351</td><td>281</td><td>209</td><td>178</td><td>158</td><td>1151</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchase obligations</td><td>1035</td><td>326</td><td>120</td><td>26</td><td>12</td><td>12</td><td>539</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total contractual obligations</td><td>$ 7497</td><td>$ 2017</td><td>$ 599</td><td>$ 239</td><td>$ 724</td><td>$ 777</td><td>$ 3141</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) amounts included represent firm , non-cancelable commitments . debt obligations : at december 31 , 2006 , the company's long-term debt obligations , including current maturities and unamortized discount and issue costs , totaled $ 4.1 billion , as compared to $ 4.0 billion at december 31 , 2005 . a table of all outstanding long-term debt securities can be found in note 4 , ""debt and credit facilities'' to the company's consolidated financial statements . lease obligations : the company owns most of its major facilities , but does lease certain office , factory and warehouse space , land , and information technology and other equipment under principally non-cancelable operating leases . at december 31 , 2006 , future minimum lease obligations , net of minimum sublease rentals , totaled $ 2.3 billion . rental expense , net of sublease income , was $ 241 million in 2006 , $ 250 million in 2005 and $ 205 million in 2004 . purchase obligations : the company has entered into agreements for the purchase of inventory , license of software , promotional agreements , and research and development agreements which are firm commitments and are not cancelable . the longest of these agreements extends through 2015 . total payments expected to be made under these agreements total $ 1.0 billion . commitments under other long-term agreements : the company has entered into certain long-term agreements to purchase software , components , supplies and materials from suppliers . most of the agreements extend for periods of one to three years ( three to five years for software ) . however , generally these agreements do not obligate the company to make any purchases , and many permit the company to terminate the agreement with advance notice ( usually ranging from 60 to 180 days ) . if the company were to terminate these agreements , it generally would be liable for certain termination charges , typically based on work performed and supplier on-hand inventory and raw materials attributable to canceled orders . the company's liability would only arise in the event it terminates the agreements for reasons other than ""cause.'' the company also enters into a number of arrangements for the sourcing of supplies and materials with minimum purchase commitments and take-or-pay obligations . the majority of the minimum purchase obligations under these contracts are over the life of the contract as opposed to a year-by-year take-or-pay . if these agreements were terminated at december 31 , 2006 , the company's obligation would not have been significant . the company does not anticipate the cancellation of any of these agreements in the future . subsequent to the end of 2006 , the company entered into take-or-pay arrangements with suppliers through may 2009 with minimum purchase obligations of $ 2.2 billion during that period . the company estimates purchases during that period that exceed the minimum obligations . the company outsources certain corporate functions , such as benefit administration and information technology-related services . these contracts are expected to expire in 2013 . the total remaining payments under these contracts are approximately $ 1.3 billion over the remaining seven years ; however , these contracts can be %%transmsg*** transmitting job : c11830 pcn : 055000000 *** %%pcmsg| |00030|yes|no|02/28/2007 13:05|0|1|page is valid , no graphics -- color : n| .
Question: what was the long-term debt in 2011?
Answer: 1340.0
Question: and what was it in 2007?
Answer: 607.0
Question: by how much, then, did it vary over the years?
Answer: 733.0
Question: and what is this variation as a percentage of the 2007 amount?
| 0.54701 |
CONVFINQA_test550 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
53management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations in order to borrow funds under the 5-year credit facility , the company must be in compliance with various conditions , covenants and representations contained in the agreements . the company was in compliance with the terms of the 5-year credit facility at december 31 , 2006 . the company has never borrowed under its domestic revolving credit facilities . utilization of the non-u.s . credit facilities may also be dependent on the company's ability to meet certain conditions at the time a borrowing is requested . contractual obligations , guarantees , and other purchase commitments contractual obligations summarized in the table below are the company's obligations and commitments to make future payments under debt obligations ( assuming earliest possible exercise of put rights by holders ) , lease payment obligations , and purchase obligations as of december 31 , 2006 . payments due by period ( 1 ) ( in millions ) total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 thereafter . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) total</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) 2007</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) 2008</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) 2009</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) 2010</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) 2011</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt obligations</td><td>$ 4134</td><td>$ 1340</td><td>$ 198</td><td>$ 4</td><td>$ 534</td><td>$ 607</td><td>$ 1451</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>lease obligations</td><td>2328</td><td>351</td><td>281</td><td>209</td><td>178</td><td>158</td><td>1151</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchase obligations</td><td>1035</td><td>326</td><td>120</td><td>26</td><td>12</td><td>12</td><td>539</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total contractual obligations</td><td>$ 7497</td><td>$ 2017</td><td>$ 599</td><td>$ 239</td><td>$ 724</td><td>$ 777</td><td>$ 3141</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) amounts included represent firm , non-cancelable commitments . debt obligations : at december 31 , 2006 , the company's long-term debt obligations , including current maturities and unamortized discount and issue costs , totaled $ 4.1 billion , as compared to $ 4.0 billion at december 31 , 2005 . a table of all outstanding long-term debt securities can be found in note 4 , ""debt and credit facilities'' to the company's consolidated financial statements . lease obligations : the company owns most of its major facilities , but does lease certain office , factory and warehouse space , land , and information technology and other equipment under principally non-cancelable operating leases . at december 31 , 2006 , future minimum lease obligations , net of minimum sublease rentals , totaled $ 2.3 billion . rental expense , net of sublease income , was $ 241 million in 2006 , $ 250 million in 2005 and $ 205 million in 2004 . purchase obligations : the company has entered into agreements for the purchase of inventory , license of software , promotional agreements , and research and development agreements which are firm commitments and are not cancelable . the longest of these agreements extends through 2015 . total payments expected to be made under these agreements total $ 1.0 billion . commitments under other long-term agreements : the company has entered into certain long-term agreements to purchase software , components , supplies and materials from suppliers . most of the agreements extend for periods of one to three years ( three to five years for software ) . however , generally these agreements do not obligate the company to make any purchases , and many permit the company to terminate the agreement with advance notice ( usually ranging from 60 to 180 days ) . if the company were to terminate these agreements , it generally would be liable for certain termination charges , typically based on work performed and supplier on-hand inventory and raw materials attributable to canceled orders . the company's liability would only arise in the event it terminates the agreements for reasons other than ""cause.'' the company also enters into a number of arrangements for the sourcing of supplies and materials with minimum purchase commitments and take-or-pay obligations . the majority of the minimum purchase obligations under these contracts are over the life of the contract as opposed to a year-by-year take-or-pay . if these agreements were terminated at december 31 , 2006 , the company's obligation would not have been significant . the company does not anticipate the cancellation of any of these agreements in the future . subsequent to the end of 2006 , the company entered into take-or-pay arrangements with suppliers through may 2009 with minimum purchase obligations of $ 2.2 billion during that period . the company estimates purchases during that period that exceed the minimum obligations . the company outsources certain corporate functions , such as benefit administration and information technology-related services . these contracts are expected to expire in 2013 . the total remaining payments under these contracts are approximately $ 1.3 billion over the remaining seven years ; however , these contracts can be %%transmsg*** transmitting job : c11830 pcn : 055000000 *** %%pcmsg| |00030|yes|no|02/28/2007 13:05|0|1|page is valid , no graphics -- color : n| .
Question: what was the long-term debt in 2011?
Answer: 1340.0
Question: and what was it in 2007?
Answer: 607.0
Question: by how much, then, did it vary over the years?
Answer: 733.0
Question: and what is this variation as a percentage of the 2007 amount?
Answer: 0.54701
Question: and from four years before, in 2004, to 2011, what was the decline in the lease obligations?
| 85.0 |
CONVFINQA_test551 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
software and will give the company a comprehensive design-to-silicon flow that links directly into the semiconductor manufacturing process . integrating hpl 2019s yield management and test chip technologies into the company 2019s industry-leading dfm portfolio is also expected to enable customers to increase their productivity and improve profitability in the design and manufacture of advanced semiconductor devices . purchase price . the company paid $ 11.0 million in cash for all outstanding shares of hpl . in addition , the company had a prior investment in hpl of approximately $ 1.9 million . the total purchase consideration consisted of: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash paid</td><td>$ 11001</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>prior investment in hpl</td><td>1872</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>acquisition-related costs</td><td>2831</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total purchase price</td><td>$ 15704</td></tr></table> acquisition-related costs of $ 2.8 million consist primarily of legal , tax and accounting fees of $ 1.6 million , $ 0.3 million of estimated facilities closure costs and other directly related charges , and $ 0.9 million in employee termination costs . as of october 31 , 2006 , the company had paid $ 2.2 million of the acquisition related costs , of which $ 1.1 million were for professional services costs , $ 0.2 million were for facilities closure costs and $ 0.9 million were for employee termination costs . the $ 0.6 million balance remaining at october 31 , 2006 consists of professional and tax-related service fees and facilities closure costs . assets acquired . the company acquired $ 8.5 million of intangible assets consisting of $ 5.1 million in core developed technology , $ 3.2 million in customer relationships and $ 0.2 million in backlog to be amortized over two to four years . approximately $ 0.8 million of the purchase price represents the fair value of acquired in-process research and development projects that have not yet reached technological feasibility and have no alternative future use . accordingly , the amount was immediately expensed and included in the company 2019s condensed consolidated statement of operations for the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 . additionally , the company acquired tangible assets of $ 14.0 million and assumed liabilities of $ 10.9 million . goodwill , representing the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired in the merger was $ 3.4 million . goodwill resulted primarily from the company 2019s expectation of synergies from the integration of hpl 2019s technology with the company 2019s technology and operations . other . during the fiscal year 2006 , the company completed an asset acquisition for cash consideration of $ 1.5 million . this acquisition is not considered material to the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet and results of operations . fiscal 2005 acquisitions nassda corporation ( nassda ) the company acquired nassda on may 11 , 2005 . reasons for the acquisition . the company believes nassda 2019s full-chip circuit simulation and analysis software will broaden its offerings of transistor-level circuit simulation tools , particularly in the area of mixed-signal and memory design . purchase price . the company acquired all the outstanding shares of nassda for total cash consideration of $ 200.2 million , or $ 7.00 per share . in addition , as required by the merger agreement , certain nassda officers , directors and employees who were defendants in certain preexisting litigation .
Question: what was the value of goodwill , representing the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired in the merger by 1000?
| 3400.0 |
CONVFINQA_test552 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
software and will give the company a comprehensive design-to-silicon flow that links directly into the semiconductor manufacturing process . integrating hpl 2019s yield management and test chip technologies into the company 2019s industry-leading dfm portfolio is also expected to enable customers to increase their productivity and improve profitability in the design and manufacture of advanced semiconductor devices . purchase price . the company paid $ 11.0 million in cash for all outstanding shares of hpl . in addition , the company had a prior investment in hpl of approximately $ 1.9 million . the total purchase consideration consisted of: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash paid</td><td>$ 11001</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>prior investment in hpl</td><td>1872</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>acquisition-related costs</td><td>2831</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total purchase price</td><td>$ 15704</td></tr></table> acquisition-related costs of $ 2.8 million consist primarily of legal , tax and accounting fees of $ 1.6 million , $ 0.3 million of estimated facilities closure costs and other directly related charges , and $ 0.9 million in employee termination costs . as of october 31 , 2006 , the company had paid $ 2.2 million of the acquisition related costs , of which $ 1.1 million were for professional services costs , $ 0.2 million were for facilities closure costs and $ 0.9 million were for employee termination costs . the $ 0.6 million balance remaining at october 31 , 2006 consists of professional and tax-related service fees and facilities closure costs . assets acquired . the company acquired $ 8.5 million of intangible assets consisting of $ 5.1 million in core developed technology , $ 3.2 million in customer relationships and $ 0.2 million in backlog to be amortized over two to four years . approximately $ 0.8 million of the purchase price represents the fair value of acquired in-process research and development projects that have not yet reached technological feasibility and have no alternative future use . accordingly , the amount was immediately expensed and included in the company 2019s condensed consolidated statement of operations for the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 . additionally , the company acquired tangible assets of $ 14.0 million and assumed liabilities of $ 10.9 million . goodwill , representing the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired in the merger was $ 3.4 million . goodwill resulted primarily from the company 2019s expectation of synergies from the integration of hpl 2019s technology with the company 2019s technology and operations . other . during the fiscal year 2006 , the company completed an asset acquisition for cash consideration of $ 1.5 million . this acquisition is not considered material to the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet and results of operations . fiscal 2005 acquisitions nassda corporation ( nassda ) the company acquired nassda on may 11 , 2005 . reasons for the acquisition . the company believes nassda 2019s full-chip circuit simulation and analysis software will broaden its offerings of transistor-level circuit simulation tools , particularly in the area of mixed-signal and memory design . purchase price . the company acquired all the outstanding shares of nassda for total cash consideration of $ 200.2 million , or $ 7.00 per share . in addition , as required by the merger agreement , certain nassda officers , directors and employees who were defendants in certain preexisting litigation .
Question: what was the value of goodwill , representing the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired in the merger by 1000?
Answer: 3400.0
Question: what was the total purchase price?
| 15704.0 |
CONVFINQA_test553 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
software and will give the company a comprehensive design-to-silicon flow that links directly into the semiconductor manufacturing process . integrating hpl 2019s yield management and test chip technologies into the company 2019s industry-leading dfm portfolio is also expected to enable customers to increase their productivity and improve profitability in the design and manufacture of advanced semiconductor devices . purchase price . the company paid $ 11.0 million in cash for all outstanding shares of hpl . in addition , the company had a prior investment in hpl of approximately $ 1.9 million . the total purchase consideration consisted of: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash paid</td><td>$ 11001</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>prior investment in hpl</td><td>1872</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>acquisition-related costs</td><td>2831</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total purchase price</td><td>$ 15704</td></tr></table> acquisition-related costs of $ 2.8 million consist primarily of legal , tax and accounting fees of $ 1.6 million , $ 0.3 million of estimated facilities closure costs and other directly related charges , and $ 0.9 million in employee termination costs . as of october 31 , 2006 , the company had paid $ 2.2 million of the acquisition related costs , of which $ 1.1 million were for professional services costs , $ 0.2 million were for facilities closure costs and $ 0.9 million were for employee termination costs . the $ 0.6 million balance remaining at october 31 , 2006 consists of professional and tax-related service fees and facilities closure costs . assets acquired . the company acquired $ 8.5 million of intangible assets consisting of $ 5.1 million in core developed technology , $ 3.2 million in customer relationships and $ 0.2 million in backlog to be amortized over two to four years . approximately $ 0.8 million of the purchase price represents the fair value of acquired in-process research and development projects that have not yet reached technological feasibility and have no alternative future use . accordingly , the amount was immediately expensed and included in the company 2019s condensed consolidated statement of operations for the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 . additionally , the company acquired tangible assets of $ 14.0 million and assumed liabilities of $ 10.9 million . goodwill , representing the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired in the merger was $ 3.4 million . goodwill resulted primarily from the company 2019s expectation of synergies from the integration of hpl 2019s technology with the company 2019s technology and operations . other . during the fiscal year 2006 , the company completed an asset acquisition for cash consideration of $ 1.5 million . this acquisition is not considered material to the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet and results of operations . fiscal 2005 acquisitions nassda corporation ( nassda ) the company acquired nassda on may 11 , 2005 . reasons for the acquisition . the company believes nassda 2019s full-chip circuit simulation and analysis software will broaden its offerings of transistor-level circuit simulation tools , particularly in the area of mixed-signal and memory design . purchase price . the company acquired all the outstanding shares of nassda for total cash consideration of $ 200.2 million , or $ 7.00 per share . in addition , as required by the merger agreement , certain nassda officers , directors and employees who were defendants in certain preexisting litigation .
Question: what was the value of goodwill , representing the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired in the merger by 1000?
Answer: 3400.0
Question: what was the total purchase price?
Answer: 15704.0
Question: what is the ratio of the goodwill to the purchase price?
| 0.21651 |
CONVFINQA_test554 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
repurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of equity securities during the fourth quarter of 2008 : number of shares purchased average paid per share2 total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total number of shares purchased</td><td>average price paid per share2</td><td>total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs</td><td>maximum number ofshares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1-31</td><td>29704</td><td>$ 5.99</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1-30</td><td>4468</td><td>$ 3.24</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1-31</td><td>12850</td><td>$ 3.98</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total1</td><td>47022</td><td>$ 5.18</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr></table> total1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47022 $ 5.18 2014 2014 1 consists of restricted shares of our common stock withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares during each month of the fourth quarter of 2008 ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . 2 the average price per month of the withheld shares was calculated by dividing the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations for each month by the aggregate number of shares of our common stock withheld each month. .
Question: what is the sum of the average price per share in november and december?
| 7.22 |
CONVFINQA_test555 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
repurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of equity securities during the fourth quarter of 2008 : number of shares purchased average paid per share2 total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total number of shares purchased</td><td>average price paid per share2</td><td>total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs</td><td>maximum number ofshares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1-31</td><td>29704</td><td>$ 5.99</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1-30</td><td>4468</td><td>$ 3.24</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1-31</td><td>12850</td><td>$ 3.98</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total1</td><td>47022</td><td>$ 5.18</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr></table> total1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47022 $ 5.18 2014 2014 1 consists of restricted shares of our common stock withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares during each month of the fourth quarter of 2008 ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . 2 the average price per month of the withheld shares was calculated by dividing the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations for each month by the aggregate number of shares of our common stock withheld each month. .
Question: what is the sum of the average price per share in november and december?
Answer: 7.22
Question: what is that divided by 2?
| 3.61 |
CONVFINQA_test556 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
included in the corporate and consumer loan tables above are purchased distressed loans , which are loans that have evidenced significant credit deterioration subsequent to origination but prior to acquisition by citigroup . in accordance with sop 03-3 , the difference between the total expected cash flows for these loans and the initial recorded investments is recognized in income over the life of the loans using a level yield . accordingly , these loans have been excluded from the impaired loan information presented above . in addition , per sop 03-3 , subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows for a purchased distressed loan require a build of an allowance so the loan retains its level yield . however , increases in the expected cash flows are first recognized as a reduction of any previously established allowance and then recognized as income prospectively over the remaining life of the loan by increasing the loan 2019s level yield . where the expected cash flows cannot be reliably estimated , the purchased distressed loan is accounted for under the cost recovery method . the carrying amount of the company 2019s purchased distressed loan portfolio at december 31 , 2010 was $ 392 million , net of an allowance of $ 77 million as of december 31 , 2010 . the changes in the accretable yield , related allowance and carrying amount net of accretable yield for 2010 are as follows : in millions of dollars accretable carrying amount of loan receivable allowance . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>accretable yield</td><td>carrying amount of loan receivable</td><td>allowance</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 27</td><td>$ 920</td><td>$ 95</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>purchases ( 1 )</td><td>1</td><td>130</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>disposals/payments received</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td><td>-594 ( 594 )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accretion</td><td>-44 ( 44 )</td><td>44</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>builds ( reductions ) to the allowance</td><td>128</td><td>2014</td><td>-18 ( 18 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>increase to expected cash flows</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>19</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>fx/other</td><td>17</td><td>-50 ( 50 )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>balance at december 31 2010 ( 2 )</td><td>$ 116</td><td>$ 469</td><td>$ 77</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 130 million of purchased loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 0 under the cost-recovery method . these balances represent the fair value of these loans at their acquisition date . the related total expected cash flows for the level-yield loans were $ 131 million at their acquisition dates . ( 2 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 315 million of loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 154 million accounted for under the cost-recovery method. .
Question: what is the difference between the beginning balance carrying amount of loan receivables and allowance?
| 825.0 |
CONVFINQA_test557 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
included in the corporate and consumer loan tables above are purchased distressed loans , which are loans that have evidenced significant credit deterioration subsequent to origination but prior to acquisition by citigroup . in accordance with sop 03-3 , the difference between the total expected cash flows for these loans and the initial recorded investments is recognized in income over the life of the loans using a level yield . accordingly , these loans have been excluded from the impaired loan information presented above . in addition , per sop 03-3 , subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows for a purchased distressed loan require a build of an allowance so the loan retains its level yield . however , increases in the expected cash flows are first recognized as a reduction of any previously established allowance and then recognized as income prospectively over the remaining life of the loan by increasing the loan 2019s level yield . where the expected cash flows cannot be reliably estimated , the purchased distressed loan is accounted for under the cost recovery method . the carrying amount of the company 2019s purchased distressed loan portfolio at december 31 , 2010 was $ 392 million , net of an allowance of $ 77 million as of december 31 , 2010 . the changes in the accretable yield , related allowance and carrying amount net of accretable yield for 2010 are as follows : in millions of dollars accretable carrying amount of loan receivable allowance . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>accretable yield</td><td>carrying amount of loan receivable</td><td>allowance</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 27</td><td>$ 920</td><td>$ 95</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>purchases ( 1 )</td><td>1</td><td>130</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>disposals/payments received</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td><td>-594 ( 594 )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accretion</td><td>-44 ( 44 )</td><td>44</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>builds ( reductions ) to the allowance</td><td>128</td><td>2014</td><td>-18 ( 18 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>increase to expected cash flows</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>19</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>fx/other</td><td>17</td><td>-50 ( 50 )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>balance at december 31 2010 ( 2 )</td><td>$ 116</td><td>$ 469</td><td>$ 77</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 130 million of purchased loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 0 under the cost-recovery method . these balances represent the fair value of these loans at their acquisition date . the related total expected cash flows for the level-yield loans were $ 131 million at their acquisition dates . ( 2 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 315 million of loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 154 million accounted for under the cost-recovery method. .
Question: what is the difference between the beginning balance carrying amount of loan receivables and allowance?
Answer: 825.0
Question: what was this difference at the end of 2010?
| 392.0 |
CONVFINQA_test558 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
included in the corporate and consumer loan tables above are purchased distressed loans , which are loans that have evidenced significant credit deterioration subsequent to origination but prior to acquisition by citigroup . in accordance with sop 03-3 , the difference between the total expected cash flows for these loans and the initial recorded investments is recognized in income over the life of the loans using a level yield . accordingly , these loans have been excluded from the impaired loan information presented above . in addition , per sop 03-3 , subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows for a purchased distressed loan require a build of an allowance so the loan retains its level yield . however , increases in the expected cash flows are first recognized as a reduction of any previously established allowance and then recognized as income prospectively over the remaining life of the loan by increasing the loan 2019s level yield . where the expected cash flows cannot be reliably estimated , the purchased distressed loan is accounted for under the cost recovery method . the carrying amount of the company 2019s purchased distressed loan portfolio at december 31 , 2010 was $ 392 million , net of an allowance of $ 77 million as of december 31 , 2010 . the changes in the accretable yield , related allowance and carrying amount net of accretable yield for 2010 are as follows : in millions of dollars accretable carrying amount of loan receivable allowance . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>accretable yield</td><td>carrying amount of loan receivable</td><td>allowance</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 27</td><td>$ 920</td><td>$ 95</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>purchases ( 1 )</td><td>1</td><td>130</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>disposals/payments received</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td><td>-594 ( 594 )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accretion</td><td>-44 ( 44 )</td><td>44</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>builds ( reductions ) to the allowance</td><td>128</td><td>2014</td><td>-18 ( 18 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>increase to expected cash flows</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>19</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>fx/other</td><td>17</td><td>-50 ( 50 )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>balance at december 31 2010 ( 2 )</td><td>$ 116</td><td>$ 469</td><td>$ 77</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 130 million of purchased loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 0 under the cost-recovery method . these balances represent the fair value of these loans at their acquisition date . the related total expected cash flows for the level-yield loans were $ 131 million at their acquisition dates . ( 2 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 315 million of loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 154 million accounted for under the cost-recovery method. .
Question: what is the difference between the beginning balance carrying amount of loan receivables and allowance?
Answer: 825.0
Question: what was this difference at the end of 2010?
Answer: 392.0
Question: what is the net difference?
| -433.0 |
CONVFINQA_test559 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
included in the corporate and consumer loan tables above are purchased distressed loans , which are loans that have evidenced significant credit deterioration subsequent to origination but prior to acquisition by citigroup . in accordance with sop 03-3 , the difference between the total expected cash flows for these loans and the initial recorded investments is recognized in income over the life of the loans using a level yield . accordingly , these loans have been excluded from the impaired loan information presented above . in addition , per sop 03-3 , subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows for a purchased distressed loan require a build of an allowance so the loan retains its level yield . however , increases in the expected cash flows are first recognized as a reduction of any previously established allowance and then recognized as income prospectively over the remaining life of the loan by increasing the loan 2019s level yield . where the expected cash flows cannot be reliably estimated , the purchased distressed loan is accounted for under the cost recovery method . the carrying amount of the company 2019s purchased distressed loan portfolio at december 31 , 2010 was $ 392 million , net of an allowance of $ 77 million as of december 31 , 2010 . the changes in the accretable yield , related allowance and carrying amount net of accretable yield for 2010 are as follows : in millions of dollars accretable carrying amount of loan receivable allowance . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>accretable yield</td><td>carrying amount of loan receivable</td><td>allowance</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 27</td><td>$ 920</td><td>$ 95</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>purchases ( 1 )</td><td>1</td><td>130</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>disposals/payments received</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td><td>-594 ( 594 )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accretion</td><td>-44 ( 44 )</td><td>44</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>builds ( reductions ) to the allowance</td><td>128</td><td>2014</td><td>-18 ( 18 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>increase to expected cash flows</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>19</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>fx/other</td><td>17</td><td>-50 ( 50 )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>balance at december 31 2010 ( 2 )</td><td>$ 116</td><td>$ 469</td><td>$ 77</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 130 million of purchased loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 0 under the cost-recovery method . these balances represent the fair value of these loans at their acquisition date . the related total expected cash flows for the level-yield loans were $ 131 million at their acquisition dates . ( 2 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 315 million of loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 154 million accounted for under the cost-recovery method. .
Question: what is the difference between the beginning balance carrying amount of loan receivables and allowance?
Answer: 825.0
Question: what was this difference at the end of 2010?
Answer: 392.0
Question: what is the net difference?
Answer: -433.0
Question: what is the net difference divided by the difference at the beginning of the period?
| -0.52485 |
CONVFINQA_test560 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
comparison of cumulative return among lkq corporation , the nasdaq stock market ( u.s. ) index and the peer group . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/31/2012</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td><td>12/31/2015</td><td>12/31/2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>lkq corporation</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 140</td><td>$ 219</td><td>$ 187</td><td>$ 197</td><td>$ 204</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 113</td><td>$ 147</td><td>$ 164</td><td>$ 163</td><td>$ 178</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>peer group</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 140</td><td>$ 177</td><td>$ 188</td><td>$ 217</td></tr></table> this stock performance information is "furnished" and shall not be deemed to be "soliciting material" or subject to rule 14a , shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section , and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the securities act of 1933 or the securities exchange act of 1934 , whether made before or after the date of this report and irrespective of any general incorporation by reference language in any such filing , except to the extent that it specifically incorporates the information by reference . information about our common stock that may be issued under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2016 included in part iii , item 12 of this annual report on form 10-k is incorporated herein by reference. .
Question: what was the price of lkq corporation in 2016?
| 204.0 |
CONVFINQA_test561 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
comparison of cumulative return among lkq corporation , the nasdaq stock market ( u.s. ) index and the peer group . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/31/2012</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td><td>12/31/2015</td><td>12/31/2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>lkq corporation</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 140</td><td>$ 219</td><td>$ 187</td><td>$ 197</td><td>$ 204</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 113</td><td>$ 147</td><td>$ 164</td><td>$ 163</td><td>$ 178</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>peer group</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 140</td><td>$ 177</td><td>$ 188</td><td>$ 217</td></tr></table> this stock performance information is "furnished" and shall not be deemed to be "soliciting material" or subject to rule 14a , shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section , and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the securities act of 1933 or the securities exchange act of 1934 , whether made before or after the date of this report and irrespective of any general incorporation by reference language in any such filing , except to the extent that it specifically incorporates the information by reference . information about our common stock that may be issued under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2016 included in part iii , item 12 of this annual report on form 10-k is incorporated herein by reference. .
Question: what was the price of lkq corporation in 2016?
Answer: 204.0
Question: what was the price in 2011?
| 100.0 |
CONVFINQA_test562 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
comparison of cumulative return among lkq corporation , the nasdaq stock market ( u.s. ) index and the peer group . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/31/2012</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td><td>12/31/2015</td><td>12/31/2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>lkq corporation</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 140</td><td>$ 219</td><td>$ 187</td><td>$ 197</td><td>$ 204</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 113</td><td>$ 147</td><td>$ 164</td><td>$ 163</td><td>$ 178</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>peer group</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 140</td><td>$ 177</td><td>$ 188</td><td>$ 217</td></tr></table> this stock performance information is "furnished" and shall not be deemed to be "soliciting material" or subject to rule 14a , shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section , and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the securities act of 1933 or the securities exchange act of 1934 , whether made before or after the date of this report and irrespective of any general incorporation by reference language in any such filing , except to the extent that it specifically incorporates the information by reference . information about our common stock that may be issued under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2016 included in part iii , item 12 of this annual report on form 10-k is incorporated herein by reference. .
Question: what was the price of lkq corporation in 2016?
Answer: 204.0
Question: what was the price in 2011?
Answer: 100.0
Question: what is the net difference?
| 104.0 |
CONVFINQA_test563 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
comparison of cumulative return among lkq corporation , the nasdaq stock market ( u.s. ) index and the peer group . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/31/2012</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td><td>12/31/2015</td><td>12/31/2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>lkq corporation</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 140</td><td>$ 219</td><td>$ 187</td><td>$ 197</td><td>$ 204</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 113</td><td>$ 147</td><td>$ 164</td><td>$ 163</td><td>$ 178</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>peer group</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 140</td><td>$ 177</td><td>$ 188</td><td>$ 217</td></tr></table> this stock performance information is "furnished" and shall not be deemed to be "soliciting material" or subject to rule 14a , shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section , and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the securities act of 1933 or the securities exchange act of 1934 , whether made before or after the date of this report and irrespective of any general incorporation by reference language in any such filing , except to the extent that it specifically incorporates the information by reference . information about our common stock that may be issued under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2016 included in part iii , item 12 of this annual report on form 10-k is incorporated herein by reference. .
Question: what was the price of lkq corporation in 2016?
Answer: 204.0
Question: what was the price in 2011?
Answer: 100.0
Question: what is the net difference?
Answer: 104.0
Question: what was the 2011 price?
| 100.0 |
CONVFINQA_test564 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
comparison of cumulative return among lkq corporation , the nasdaq stock market ( u.s. ) index and the peer group . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/31/2012</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td><td>12/31/2015</td><td>12/31/2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>lkq corporation</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 140</td><td>$ 219</td><td>$ 187</td><td>$ 197</td><td>$ 204</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 113</td><td>$ 147</td><td>$ 164</td><td>$ 163</td><td>$ 178</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>peer group</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 140</td><td>$ 177</td><td>$ 188</td><td>$ 217</td></tr></table> this stock performance information is "furnished" and shall not be deemed to be "soliciting material" or subject to rule 14a , shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section , and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the securities act of 1933 or the securities exchange act of 1934 , whether made before or after the date of this report and irrespective of any general incorporation by reference language in any such filing , except to the extent that it specifically incorporates the information by reference . information about our common stock that may be issued under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2016 included in part iii , item 12 of this annual report on form 10-k is incorporated herein by reference. .
Question: what was the price of lkq corporation in 2016?
Answer: 204.0
Question: what was the price in 2011?
Answer: 100.0
Question: what is the net difference?
Answer: 104.0
Question: what was the 2011 price?
Answer: 100.0
Question: what is the change over the 2011 price?
| 1.04 |
CONVFINQA_test565 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
retail and hnw investors ( excluding investments in ishares ) retail / hnw long-term aum by asset class & client region december 31 , 2012 ( dollar amounts in millions ) americas emea asia-pacific total . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollar amounts in millions )</td><td>americas</td><td>emea</td><td>asia-pacific</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity</td><td>$ 94805</td><td>$ 53140</td><td>$ 16803</td><td>$ 164748</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fixed income</td><td>121640</td><td>11444</td><td>5341</td><td>138425</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>multi-asset class</td><td>76714</td><td>9538</td><td>4374</td><td>90626</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>alternatives</td><td>4865</td><td>3577</td><td>1243</td><td>9685</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>long-term retail/hnw</td><td>$ 298024</td><td>$ 77699</td><td>$ 27761</td><td>$ 403484</td></tr></table> blackrock serves retail and hnw investors globally through separate accounts , open-end and closed-end funds , unit trusts and private investment funds . at december 31 , 2012 , long-term assets managed for retail and hnw investors totaled $ 403.5 billion , up 11% ( 11 % ) , or $ 40.1 billion , versus year-end 2011 . during the year , net inflows of $ 11.6 billion in long-term products were augmented by market valuation improvements of $ 28.3 billion . retail and hnw investors are served principally through intermediaries , including broker-dealers , banks , trust companies , insurance companies and independent financial advisors . clients invest primarily in mutual funds , which totaled $ 322.4 billion , or 80% ( 80 % ) , of retail and hnw long-term aum at year-end , with the remainder invested in private investment funds and separately managed accounts . the product mix is well diversified , with 41% ( 41 % ) of long-term aum in equities , 34% ( 34 % ) in fixed income , 23% ( 23 % ) in multi-asset class and 2% ( 2 % ) in alternatives . the vast majority ( 98% ( 98 % ) ) of long-term aum is invested in active products , although this is partially inflated by the fact that ishares is shown separately , since we do not identify all of the underlying investors . the client base is also diversified geographically , with 74% ( 74 % ) of long-term aum managed for investors based in the americas , 19% ( 19 % ) in emea and 7% ( 7 % ) in asia-pacific at year- end 2012 . 2022 u.s . retail and hnw long-term inflows of $ 9.8 billion were driven by strong demand for u.s . sector- specialty and municipal fixed income mutual fund offerings and income-oriented equity . in 2012 , we broadened the distribution of alternatives funds to bring higher alpha , institutional quality hedge fund products to retail investors as three mutual funds launched at the end of 2011 gained traction and acceptance , raising close to $ 0.8 billion of assets . u.s . retail alternatives aum crossed the $ 5.0 billion threshold in 2012 . the year also included the launch of the blackrock municipal target term trust ( 201cbtt 201d ) with $ 2.1 billion of assets raised , making it the largest municipal fund ever launched and the largest overall industry offering since 2007 . we are the leading u.s . manager by aum of separately managed accounts , the second largest closed-end fund manager and a top-ten manager of long-term open-end mutual funds2 . 2022 international retail net inflows of $ 1.8 billion in 2012 were driven by fixed income net inflows of $ 5.2 billion . investor demand remained distinctly risk-off in 2012 , largely driven by macro political and economic instability and continued trends toward de-risking . equity net outflows of $ 2.9 billion were predominantly from sector-specific and regional and country- specific equity strategies due to uncertainty in european markets . our international retail and hnw offerings include our luxembourg cross-border fund families , blackrock global funds ( 201cbgf 201d ) , blackrock strategic funds with $ 83.1 billion and $ 2.4 billion of aum at year-end 2012 , respectively , and a range of retail funds in the united kingdom . bgf contained 67 funds registered in 35 jurisdictions at year-end 2012 . over 60% ( 60 % ) of the funds were rated by s&p . in 2012 , we were ranked as the third largest cross border fund provider3 . in the united kingdom , we ranked among the five largest fund managers3 , and are known for our innovative product offerings , especially within natural resources , european equity , asian equity and equity income . global clientele our footprint in each of these regions reflects strong relationships with intermediaries and an established ability to deliver our global investment expertise in funds and other products tailored to local regulations and requirements . 2 simfund , cerulli 3 lipper feri .
Question: what was the long-term retail/hnw in americas as a percentage of the total long-term retail/hnw?
| 0.73863 |
CONVFINQA_test566 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
retail and hnw investors ( excluding investments in ishares ) retail / hnw long-term aum by asset class & client region december 31 , 2012 ( dollar amounts in millions ) americas emea asia-pacific total . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollar amounts in millions )</td><td>americas</td><td>emea</td><td>asia-pacific</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity</td><td>$ 94805</td><td>$ 53140</td><td>$ 16803</td><td>$ 164748</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fixed income</td><td>121640</td><td>11444</td><td>5341</td><td>138425</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>multi-asset class</td><td>76714</td><td>9538</td><td>4374</td><td>90626</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>alternatives</td><td>4865</td><td>3577</td><td>1243</td><td>9685</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>long-term retail/hnw</td><td>$ 298024</td><td>$ 77699</td><td>$ 27761</td><td>$ 403484</td></tr></table> blackrock serves retail and hnw investors globally through separate accounts , open-end and closed-end funds , unit trusts and private investment funds . at december 31 , 2012 , long-term assets managed for retail and hnw investors totaled $ 403.5 billion , up 11% ( 11 % ) , or $ 40.1 billion , versus year-end 2011 . during the year , net inflows of $ 11.6 billion in long-term products were augmented by market valuation improvements of $ 28.3 billion . retail and hnw investors are served principally through intermediaries , including broker-dealers , banks , trust companies , insurance companies and independent financial advisors . clients invest primarily in mutual funds , which totaled $ 322.4 billion , or 80% ( 80 % ) , of retail and hnw long-term aum at year-end , with the remainder invested in private investment funds and separately managed accounts . the product mix is well diversified , with 41% ( 41 % ) of long-term aum in equities , 34% ( 34 % ) in fixed income , 23% ( 23 % ) in multi-asset class and 2% ( 2 % ) in alternatives . the vast majority ( 98% ( 98 % ) ) of long-term aum is invested in active products , although this is partially inflated by the fact that ishares is shown separately , since we do not identify all of the underlying investors . the client base is also diversified geographically , with 74% ( 74 % ) of long-term aum managed for investors based in the americas , 19% ( 19 % ) in emea and 7% ( 7 % ) in asia-pacific at year- end 2012 . 2022 u.s . retail and hnw long-term inflows of $ 9.8 billion were driven by strong demand for u.s . sector- specialty and municipal fixed income mutual fund offerings and income-oriented equity . in 2012 , we broadened the distribution of alternatives funds to bring higher alpha , institutional quality hedge fund products to retail investors as three mutual funds launched at the end of 2011 gained traction and acceptance , raising close to $ 0.8 billion of assets . u.s . retail alternatives aum crossed the $ 5.0 billion threshold in 2012 . the year also included the launch of the blackrock municipal target term trust ( 201cbtt 201d ) with $ 2.1 billion of assets raised , making it the largest municipal fund ever launched and the largest overall industry offering since 2007 . we are the leading u.s . manager by aum of separately managed accounts , the second largest closed-end fund manager and a top-ten manager of long-term open-end mutual funds2 . 2022 international retail net inflows of $ 1.8 billion in 2012 were driven by fixed income net inflows of $ 5.2 billion . investor demand remained distinctly risk-off in 2012 , largely driven by macro political and economic instability and continued trends toward de-risking . equity net outflows of $ 2.9 billion were predominantly from sector-specific and regional and country- specific equity strategies due to uncertainty in european markets . our international retail and hnw offerings include our luxembourg cross-border fund families , blackrock global funds ( 201cbgf 201d ) , blackrock strategic funds with $ 83.1 billion and $ 2.4 billion of aum at year-end 2012 , respectively , and a range of retail funds in the united kingdom . bgf contained 67 funds registered in 35 jurisdictions at year-end 2012 . over 60% ( 60 % ) of the funds were rated by s&p . in 2012 , we were ranked as the third largest cross border fund provider3 . in the united kingdom , we ranked among the five largest fund managers3 , and are known for our innovative product offerings , especially within natural resources , european equity , asian equity and equity income . global clientele our footprint in each of these regions reflects strong relationships with intermediaries and an established ability to deliver our global investment expertise in funds and other products tailored to local regulations and requirements . 2 simfund , cerulli 3 lipper feri .
Question: what was the long-term retail/hnw in americas as a percentage of the total long-term retail/hnw?
Answer: 0.73863
Question: and for emea?
| 0.19257 |
CONVFINQA_test567 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) a summary of the remaining liability for the 2007 , 2003 and 2001 restructuring programs is as follows : program program program total . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2007 program</td><td>2003 program</td><td>2001 program</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>liability at december 31 2006</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 12.6</td><td>$ 19.2</td><td>$ 31.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net charges ( reversals ) and adjustments</td><td>19.1</td><td>-0.5 ( 0.5 )</td><td>-5.2 ( 5.2 )</td><td>13.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>payments and other1</td><td>-7.2 ( 7.2 )</td><td>-3.1 ( 3.1 )</td><td>-5.3 ( 5.3 )</td><td>-15.6 ( 15.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>liability at december 31 2007</td><td>$ 11.9</td><td>$ 9.0</td><td>$ 8.7</td><td>$ 29.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net charges and adjustments</td><td>4.3</td><td>0.8</td><td>0.7</td><td>5.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>payments and other1</td><td>-15.0 ( 15.0 )</td><td>-4.1 ( 4.1 )</td><td>-3.5 ( 3.5 )</td><td>-22.6 ( 22.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>liability at december 31 2008</td><td>$ 1.2</td><td>$ 5.7</td><td>$ 5.9</td><td>$ 12.8</td></tr></table> 1 includes amounts representing adjustments to the liability for changes in foreign currency exchange rates . other reorganization-related charges other reorganization-related charges relate to our realignment of our media businesses into a newly created management entity called mediabrands and the 2006 merger of draft worldwide and foote , cone and belding worldwide to create draftfcb . charges related to severance and terminations costs and lease termination and other exit costs . we expect charges associated with mediabrands to be completed during the first half of 2009 . charges related to the creation of draftfcb in 2006 are complete . the charges were separated from the rest of our operating expenses within the consolidated statements of operations because they did not result from charges that occurred in the normal course of business. .
Question: what was the total liability by the end of 2008?
| 29.6 |
CONVFINQA_test568 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) a summary of the remaining liability for the 2007 , 2003 and 2001 restructuring programs is as follows : program program program total . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2007 program</td><td>2003 program</td><td>2001 program</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>liability at december 31 2006</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 12.6</td><td>$ 19.2</td><td>$ 31.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net charges ( reversals ) and adjustments</td><td>19.1</td><td>-0.5 ( 0.5 )</td><td>-5.2 ( 5.2 )</td><td>13.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>payments and other1</td><td>-7.2 ( 7.2 )</td><td>-3.1 ( 3.1 )</td><td>-5.3 ( 5.3 )</td><td>-15.6 ( 15.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>liability at december 31 2007</td><td>$ 11.9</td><td>$ 9.0</td><td>$ 8.7</td><td>$ 29.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net charges and adjustments</td><td>4.3</td><td>0.8</td><td>0.7</td><td>5.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>payments and other1</td><td>-15.0 ( 15.0 )</td><td>-4.1 ( 4.1 )</td><td>-3.5 ( 3.5 )</td><td>-22.6 ( 22.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>liability at december 31 2008</td><td>$ 1.2</td><td>$ 5.7</td><td>$ 5.9</td><td>$ 12.8</td></tr></table> 1 includes amounts representing adjustments to the liability for changes in foreign currency exchange rates . other reorganization-related charges other reorganization-related charges relate to our realignment of our media businesses into a newly created management entity called mediabrands and the 2006 merger of draft worldwide and foote , cone and belding worldwide to create draftfcb . charges related to severance and terminations costs and lease termination and other exit costs . we expect charges associated with mediabrands to be completed during the first half of 2009 . charges related to the creation of draftfcb in 2006 are complete . the charges were separated from the rest of our operating expenses within the consolidated statements of operations because they did not result from charges that occurred in the normal course of business. .
Question: what was the total liability by the end of 2008?
Answer: 29.6
Question: and what was it by the end of 2007?
| 12.8 |
CONVFINQA_test569 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) a summary of the remaining liability for the 2007 , 2003 and 2001 restructuring programs is as follows : program program program total . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2007 program</td><td>2003 program</td><td>2001 program</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>liability at december 31 2006</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 12.6</td><td>$ 19.2</td><td>$ 31.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net charges ( reversals ) and adjustments</td><td>19.1</td><td>-0.5 ( 0.5 )</td><td>-5.2 ( 5.2 )</td><td>13.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>payments and other1</td><td>-7.2 ( 7.2 )</td><td>-3.1 ( 3.1 )</td><td>-5.3 ( 5.3 )</td><td>-15.6 ( 15.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>liability at december 31 2007</td><td>$ 11.9</td><td>$ 9.0</td><td>$ 8.7</td><td>$ 29.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net charges and adjustments</td><td>4.3</td><td>0.8</td><td>0.7</td><td>5.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>payments and other1</td><td>-15.0 ( 15.0 )</td><td>-4.1 ( 4.1 )</td><td>-3.5 ( 3.5 )</td><td>-22.6 ( 22.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>liability at december 31 2008</td><td>$ 1.2</td><td>$ 5.7</td><td>$ 5.9</td><td>$ 12.8</td></tr></table> 1 includes amounts representing adjustments to the liability for changes in foreign currency exchange rates . other reorganization-related charges other reorganization-related charges relate to our realignment of our media businesses into a newly created management entity called mediabrands and the 2006 merger of draft worldwide and foote , cone and belding worldwide to create draftfcb . charges related to severance and terminations costs and lease termination and other exit costs . we expect charges associated with mediabrands to be completed during the first half of 2009 . charges related to the creation of draftfcb in 2006 are complete . the charges were separated from the rest of our operating expenses within the consolidated statements of operations because they did not result from charges that occurred in the normal course of business. .
Question: what was the total liability by the end of 2008?
Answer: 29.6
Question: and what was it by the end of 2007?
Answer: 12.8
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
| 16.8 |
CONVFINQA_test570 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) a summary of the remaining liability for the 2007 , 2003 and 2001 restructuring programs is as follows : program program program total . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2007 program</td><td>2003 program</td><td>2001 program</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>liability at december 31 2006</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 12.6</td><td>$ 19.2</td><td>$ 31.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net charges ( reversals ) and adjustments</td><td>19.1</td><td>-0.5 ( 0.5 )</td><td>-5.2 ( 5.2 )</td><td>13.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>payments and other1</td><td>-7.2 ( 7.2 )</td><td>-3.1 ( 3.1 )</td><td>-5.3 ( 5.3 )</td><td>-15.6 ( 15.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>liability at december 31 2007</td><td>$ 11.9</td><td>$ 9.0</td><td>$ 8.7</td><td>$ 29.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net charges and adjustments</td><td>4.3</td><td>0.8</td><td>0.7</td><td>5.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>payments and other1</td><td>-15.0 ( 15.0 )</td><td>-4.1 ( 4.1 )</td><td>-3.5 ( 3.5 )</td><td>-22.6 ( 22.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>liability at december 31 2008</td><td>$ 1.2</td><td>$ 5.7</td><td>$ 5.9</td><td>$ 12.8</td></tr></table> 1 includes amounts representing adjustments to the liability for changes in foreign currency exchange rates . other reorganization-related charges other reorganization-related charges relate to our realignment of our media businesses into a newly created management entity called mediabrands and the 2006 merger of draft worldwide and foote , cone and belding worldwide to create draftfcb . charges related to severance and terminations costs and lease termination and other exit costs . we expect charges associated with mediabrands to be completed during the first half of 2009 . charges related to the creation of draftfcb in 2006 are complete . the charges were separated from the rest of our operating expenses within the consolidated statements of operations because they did not result from charges that occurred in the normal course of business. .
Question: what was the total liability by the end of 2008?
Answer: 29.6
Question: and what was it by the end of 2007?
Answer: 12.8
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Answer: 16.8
Question: what was the total liability by the end of 2008?
| 29.6 |
CONVFINQA_test571 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) a summary of the remaining liability for the 2007 , 2003 and 2001 restructuring programs is as follows : program program program total . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2007 program</td><td>2003 program</td><td>2001 program</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>liability at december 31 2006</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 12.6</td><td>$ 19.2</td><td>$ 31.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net charges ( reversals ) and adjustments</td><td>19.1</td><td>-0.5 ( 0.5 )</td><td>-5.2 ( 5.2 )</td><td>13.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>payments and other1</td><td>-7.2 ( 7.2 )</td><td>-3.1 ( 3.1 )</td><td>-5.3 ( 5.3 )</td><td>-15.6 ( 15.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>liability at december 31 2007</td><td>$ 11.9</td><td>$ 9.0</td><td>$ 8.7</td><td>$ 29.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net charges and adjustments</td><td>4.3</td><td>0.8</td><td>0.7</td><td>5.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>payments and other1</td><td>-15.0 ( 15.0 )</td><td>-4.1 ( 4.1 )</td><td>-3.5 ( 3.5 )</td><td>-22.6 ( 22.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>liability at december 31 2008</td><td>$ 1.2</td><td>$ 5.7</td><td>$ 5.9</td><td>$ 12.8</td></tr></table> 1 includes amounts representing adjustments to the liability for changes in foreign currency exchange rates . other reorganization-related charges other reorganization-related charges relate to our realignment of our media businesses into a newly created management entity called mediabrands and the 2006 merger of draft worldwide and foote , cone and belding worldwide to create draftfcb . charges related to severance and terminations costs and lease termination and other exit costs . we expect charges associated with mediabrands to be completed during the first half of 2009 . charges related to the creation of draftfcb in 2006 are complete . the charges were separated from the rest of our operating expenses within the consolidated statements of operations because they did not result from charges that occurred in the normal course of business. .
Question: what was the total liability by the end of 2008?
Answer: 29.6
Question: and what was it by the end of 2007?
Answer: 12.8
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Answer: 16.8
Question: what was the total liability by the end of 2008?
Answer: 29.6
Question: and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2008 total liability?
| 0.56757 |
CONVFINQA_test572 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) a summary of the remaining liability for the 2007 , 2003 and 2001 restructuring programs is as follows : program program program total . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2007 program</td><td>2003 program</td><td>2001 program</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>liability at december 31 2006</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 12.6</td><td>$ 19.2</td><td>$ 31.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net charges ( reversals ) and adjustments</td><td>19.1</td><td>-0.5 ( 0.5 )</td><td>-5.2 ( 5.2 )</td><td>13.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>payments and other1</td><td>-7.2 ( 7.2 )</td><td>-3.1 ( 3.1 )</td><td>-5.3 ( 5.3 )</td><td>-15.6 ( 15.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>liability at december 31 2007</td><td>$ 11.9</td><td>$ 9.0</td><td>$ 8.7</td><td>$ 29.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net charges and adjustments</td><td>4.3</td><td>0.8</td><td>0.7</td><td>5.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>payments and other1</td><td>-15.0 ( 15.0 )</td><td>-4.1 ( 4.1 )</td><td>-3.5 ( 3.5 )</td><td>-22.6 ( 22.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>liability at december 31 2008</td><td>$ 1.2</td><td>$ 5.7</td><td>$ 5.9</td><td>$ 12.8</td></tr></table> 1 includes amounts representing adjustments to the liability for changes in foreign currency exchange rates . other reorganization-related charges other reorganization-related charges relate to our realignment of our media businesses into a newly created management entity called mediabrands and the 2006 merger of draft worldwide and foote , cone and belding worldwide to create draftfcb . charges related to severance and terminations costs and lease termination and other exit costs . we expect charges associated with mediabrands to be completed during the first half of 2009 . charges related to the creation of draftfcb in 2006 are complete . the charges were separated from the rest of our operating expenses within the consolidated statements of operations because they did not result from charges that occurred in the normal course of business. .
Question: what was the total liability by the end of 2008?
Answer: 29.6
Question: and what was it by the end of 2007?
Answer: 12.8
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Answer: 16.8
Question: what was the total liability by the end of 2008?
Answer: 29.6
Question: and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2008 total liability?
Answer: 0.56757
Question: how much is that in percentage?
| 56.75676 |
CONVFINQA_test573 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
page 15 of 100 shareholder return performance the line graph below compares the annual percentage change in ball corporation 2019s cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones containers & packaging index and the s&p composite 500 stock index for the five-year period ended december 31 , 2010 . it assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 , and that all dividends were reinvested . the dow jones containers & packaging index total return has been weighted by market capitalization . total return analysis . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/31/06</td><td>12/31/07</td><td>12/31/08</td><td>12/31/09</td><td>12/31/10</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ball corporation</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 110.86</td><td>$ 115.36</td><td>$ 107.58</td><td>$ 134.96</td><td>$ 178.93</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dj containers & packaging index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 112.09</td><td>$ 119.63</td><td>$ 75.00</td><td>$ 105.34</td><td>$ 123.56</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 115.80</td><td>$ 122.16</td><td>$ 76.96</td><td>$ 97.33</td><td>$ 111.99</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )</td><td>copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )</td><td>copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )</td><td>copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )</td><td>copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )</td><td>copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )</td><td>copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .</td><td>copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .</td><td>copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .</td><td>copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .</td><td>copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .</td><td>copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .</td><td>copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the change in price for ball corporation between 12/31/10 and 12/31/05?
| 78.93 |
CONVFINQA_test574 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
page 15 of 100 shareholder return performance the line graph below compares the annual percentage change in ball corporation 2019s cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones containers & packaging index and the s&p composite 500 stock index for the five-year period ended december 31 , 2010 . it assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 , and that all dividends were reinvested . the dow jones containers & packaging index total return has been weighted by market capitalization . total return analysis . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/31/06</td><td>12/31/07</td><td>12/31/08</td><td>12/31/09</td><td>12/31/10</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ball corporation</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 110.86</td><td>$ 115.36</td><td>$ 107.58</td><td>$ 134.96</td><td>$ 178.93</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dj containers & packaging index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 112.09</td><td>$ 119.63</td><td>$ 75.00</td><td>$ 105.34</td><td>$ 123.56</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 115.80</td><td>$ 122.16</td><td>$ 76.96</td><td>$ 97.33</td><td>$ 111.99</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )</td><td>copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )</td><td>copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )</td><td>copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )</td><td>copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )</td><td>copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )</td><td>copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .</td><td>copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .</td><td>copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .</td><td>copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .</td><td>copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .</td><td>copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .</td><td>copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the change in price for ball corporation between 12/31/10 and 12/31/05?
Answer: 78.93
Question: so what was the percentage cumulative return during this time?
| 0.7893 |
CONVFINQA_test575 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
page 15 of 100 shareholder return performance the line graph below compares the annual percentage change in ball corporation 2019s cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones containers & packaging index and the s&p composite 500 stock index for the five-year period ended december 31 , 2010 . it assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 , and that all dividends were reinvested . the dow jones containers & packaging index total return has been weighted by market capitalization . total return analysis . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/31/06</td><td>12/31/07</td><td>12/31/08</td><td>12/31/09</td><td>12/31/10</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ball corporation</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 110.86</td><td>$ 115.36</td><td>$ 107.58</td><td>$ 134.96</td><td>$ 178.93</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dj containers & packaging index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 112.09</td><td>$ 119.63</td><td>$ 75.00</td><td>$ 105.34</td><td>$ 123.56</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 115.80</td><td>$ 122.16</td><td>$ 76.96</td><td>$ 97.33</td><td>$ 111.99</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )</td><td>copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )</td><td>copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )</td><td>copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )</td><td>copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )</td><td>copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )</td><td>copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .</td><td>copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .</td><td>copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .</td><td>copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .</td><td>copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .</td><td>copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .</td><td>copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the change in price for ball corporation between 12/31/10 and 12/31/05?
Answer: 78.93
Question: so what was the percentage cumulative return during this time?
Answer: 0.7893
Question: did the five year total return for ball corporation outperform the dj containers & packaging index?
| yes |
CONVFINQA_test576 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis the decrease in interest income in 2002 was primarily due to : fffd interest recognized in 2001 on grand gulf 1's decommissioning trust funds resulting from the final order addressing system energy's rate proceeding ; fffd interest recognized in 2001 at entergy mississippi and entergy new orleans on the deferred system energy costs that were not being recovered through rates ; and fffd lower interest earned on declining deferred fuel balances . the decrease in interest charges in 2002 is primarily due to : fffd a decrease of $ 31.9 million in interest on long-term debt primarily due to the retirement of long-term debt in late 2001 and early 2002 ; and fffd a decrease of $ 76.0 million in other interest expense primarily due to interest recorded on system energy's reserve for rate refund in 2001 . the refund was made in december 2001 . 2001 compared to 2000 results for the year ended december 31 , 2001 for u.s . utility were also affected by an increase in interest charges of $ 61.5 million primarily due to : fffd the final ferc order addressing the 1995 system energy rate filing ; fffd debt issued at entergy arkansas in july 2001 , at entergy gulf states in june 2000 and august 2001 , at entergy mississippi in january 2001 , and at entergy new orleans in july 2000 and february 2001 ; and fffd borrowings under credit facilities during 2001 , primarily at entergy arkansas . non-utility nuclear the increase in earnings in 2002 for non-utility nuclear from $ 128 million to $ 201 million was primarily due to the operation of indian point 2 and vermont yankee , which were purchased in september 2001 and july 2002 , respectively . the increase in earnings in 2001 for non-utility nuclear from $ 49 million to $ 128 million was primarily due to the operation of fitzpatrick and indian point 3 for a full year , as each was purchased in november 2000 , and the operation of indian point 2 , which was purchased in september 2001 . following are key performance measures for non-utility nuclear: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net mw in operation at december 31</td><td>3955</td><td>3445</td><td>2475</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>generation in gwh for the year</td><td>29953</td><td>22614</td><td>7171</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>capacity factor for the year</td><td>93% ( 93 % )</td><td>93% ( 93 % )</td><td>94% ( 94 % )</td></tr></table> 2002 compared to 2001 the following fluctuations in the results of operations for non-utility nuclear in 2002 were primarily caused by the acquisitions of indian point 2 and vermont yankee ( except as otherwise noted ) : fffd operating revenues increased $ 411.0 million to $ 1.2 billion ; fffd other operation and maintenance expenses increased $ 201.8 million to $ 596.3 million ; fffd depreciation and amortization expenses increased $ 25.1 million to $ 42.8 million ; fffd fuel expenses increased $ 29.4 million to $ 105.2 million ; fffd nuclear refueling outage expenses increased $ 23.9 million to $ 46.8 million , which was due primarily to a .
Question: what was the net change in non-utility nuclear earnings from 2001 to 2002?
| 73.0 |
CONVFINQA_test577 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis the decrease in interest income in 2002 was primarily due to : fffd interest recognized in 2001 on grand gulf 1's decommissioning trust funds resulting from the final order addressing system energy's rate proceeding ; fffd interest recognized in 2001 at entergy mississippi and entergy new orleans on the deferred system energy costs that were not being recovered through rates ; and fffd lower interest earned on declining deferred fuel balances . the decrease in interest charges in 2002 is primarily due to : fffd a decrease of $ 31.9 million in interest on long-term debt primarily due to the retirement of long-term debt in late 2001 and early 2002 ; and fffd a decrease of $ 76.0 million in other interest expense primarily due to interest recorded on system energy's reserve for rate refund in 2001 . the refund was made in december 2001 . 2001 compared to 2000 results for the year ended december 31 , 2001 for u.s . utility were also affected by an increase in interest charges of $ 61.5 million primarily due to : fffd the final ferc order addressing the 1995 system energy rate filing ; fffd debt issued at entergy arkansas in july 2001 , at entergy gulf states in june 2000 and august 2001 , at entergy mississippi in january 2001 , and at entergy new orleans in july 2000 and february 2001 ; and fffd borrowings under credit facilities during 2001 , primarily at entergy arkansas . non-utility nuclear the increase in earnings in 2002 for non-utility nuclear from $ 128 million to $ 201 million was primarily due to the operation of indian point 2 and vermont yankee , which were purchased in september 2001 and july 2002 , respectively . the increase in earnings in 2001 for non-utility nuclear from $ 49 million to $ 128 million was primarily due to the operation of fitzpatrick and indian point 3 for a full year , as each was purchased in november 2000 , and the operation of indian point 2 , which was purchased in september 2001 . following are key performance measures for non-utility nuclear: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net mw in operation at december 31</td><td>3955</td><td>3445</td><td>2475</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>generation in gwh for the year</td><td>29953</td><td>22614</td><td>7171</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>capacity factor for the year</td><td>93% ( 93 % )</td><td>93% ( 93 % )</td><td>94% ( 94 % )</td></tr></table> 2002 compared to 2001 the following fluctuations in the results of operations for non-utility nuclear in 2002 were primarily caused by the acquisitions of indian point 2 and vermont yankee ( except as otherwise noted ) : fffd operating revenues increased $ 411.0 million to $ 1.2 billion ; fffd other operation and maintenance expenses increased $ 201.8 million to $ 596.3 million ; fffd depreciation and amortization expenses increased $ 25.1 million to $ 42.8 million ; fffd fuel expenses increased $ 29.4 million to $ 105.2 million ; fffd nuclear refueling outage expenses increased $ 23.9 million to $ 46.8 million , which was due primarily to a .
Question: what was the net change in non-utility nuclear earnings from 2001 to 2002?
Answer: 73.0
Question: what was the value in 2001?
| 128.0 |
CONVFINQA_test578 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis the decrease in interest income in 2002 was primarily due to : fffd interest recognized in 2001 on grand gulf 1's decommissioning trust funds resulting from the final order addressing system energy's rate proceeding ; fffd interest recognized in 2001 at entergy mississippi and entergy new orleans on the deferred system energy costs that were not being recovered through rates ; and fffd lower interest earned on declining deferred fuel balances . the decrease in interest charges in 2002 is primarily due to : fffd a decrease of $ 31.9 million in interest on long-term debt primarily due to the retirement of long-term debt in late 2001 and early 2002 ; and fffd a decrease of $ 76.0 million in other interest expense primarily due to interest recorded on system energy's reserve for rate refund in 2001 . the refund was made in december 2001 . 2001 compared to 2000 results for the year ended december 31 , 2001 for u.s . utility were also affected by an increase in interest charges of $ 61.5 million primarily due to : fffd the final ferc order addressing the 1995 system energy rate filing ; fffd debt issued at entergy arkansas in july 2001 , at entergy gulf states in june 2000 and august 2001 , at entergy mississippi in january 2001 , and at entergy new orleans in july 2000 and february 2001 ; and fffd borrowings under credit facilities during 2001 , primarily at entergy arkansas . non-utility nuclear the increase in earnings in 2002 for non-utility nuclear from $ 128 million to $ 201 million was primarily due to the operation of indian point 2 and vermont yankee , which were purchased in september 2001 and july 2002 , respectively . the increase in earnings in 2001 for non-utility nuclear from $ 49 million to $ 128 million was primarily due to the operation of fitzpatrick and indian point 3 for a full year , as each was purchased in november 2000 , and the operation of indian point 2 , which was purchased in september 2001 . following are key performance measures for non-utility nuclear: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net mw in operation at december 31</td><td>3955</td><td>3445</td><td>2475</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>generation in gwh for the year</td><td>29953</td><td>22614</td><td>7171</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>capacity factor for the year</td><td>93% ( 93 % )</td><td>93% ( 93 % )</td><td>94% ( 94 % )</td></tr></table> 2002 compared to 2001 the following fluctuations in the results of operations for non-utility nuclear in 2002 were primarily caused by the acquisitions of indian point 2 and vermont yankee ( except as otherwise noted ) : fffd operating revenues increased $ 411.0 million to $ 1.2 billion ; fffd other operation and maintenance expenses increased $ 201.8 million to $ 596.3 million ; fffd depreciation and amortization expenses increased $ 25.1 million to $ 42.8 million ; fffd fuel expenses increased $ 29.4 million to $ 105.2 million ; fffd nuclear refueling outage expenses increased $ 23.9 million to $ 46.8 million , which was due primarily to a .
Question: what was the net change in non-utility nuclear earnings from 2001 to 2002?
Answer: 73.0
Question: what was the value in 2001?
Answer: 128.0
Question: what is the change over the 2001 value?
| 0.57031 |
CONVFINQA_test579 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 65691 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2018 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2017 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>date</td><td>citi</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>s&p financials</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>31-dec-2012</td><td>100.0</td><td>100.0</td><td>100.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>31-dec-2013</td><td>131.8</td><td>132.4</td><td>135.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>31-dec-2014</td><td>137.0</td><td>150.5</td><td>156.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>31-dec-2015</td><td>131.4</td><td>152.6</td><td>153.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>31-dec-2016</td><td>152.3</td><td>170.8</td><td>188.9</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>31-dec-2017</td><td>193.5</td><td>208.1</td><td>230.9</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the value of s&p financials in 2016?
| 188.9 |
CONVFINQA_test580 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 65691 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2018 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2017 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>date</td><td>citi</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>s&p financials</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>31-dec-2012</td><td>100.0</td><td>100.0</td><td>100.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>31-dec-2013</td><td>131.8</td><td>132.4</td><td>135.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>31-dec-2014</td><td>137.0</td><td>150.5</td><td>156.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>31-dec-2015</td><td>131.4</td><td>152.6</td><td>153.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>31-dec-2016</td><td>152.3</td><td>170.8</td><td>188.9</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>31-dec-2017</td><td>193.5</td><td>208.1</td><td>230.9</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the value of s&p financials in 2016?
Answer: 188.9
Question: what is the value in 2015?
| 153.9 |
CONVFINQA_test581 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 65691 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2018 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2017 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>date</td><td>citi</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>s&p financials</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>31-dec-2012</td><td>100.0</td><td>100.0</td><td>100.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>31-dec-2013</td><td>131.8</td><td>132.4</td><td>135.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>31-dec-2014</td><td>137.0</td><td>150.5</td><td>156.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>31-dec-2015</td><td>131.4</td><td>152.6</td><td>153.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>31-dec-2016</td><td>152.3</td><td>170.8</td><td>188.9</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>31-dec-2017</td><td>193.5</td><td>208.1</td><td>230.9</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the value of s&p financials in 2016?
Answer: 188.9
Question: what is the value in 2015?
Answer: 153.9
Question: what is the net change?
| 35.0 |
CONVFINQA_test582 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 65691 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2018 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2017 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>date</td><td>citi</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>s&p financials</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>31-dec-2012</td><td>100.0</td><td>100.0</td><td>100.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>31-dec-2013</td><td>131.8</td><td>132.4</td><td>135.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>31-dec-2014</td><td>137.0</td><td>150.5</td><td>156.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>31-dec-2015</td><td>131.4</td><td>152.6</td><td>153.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>31-dec-2016</td><td>152.3</td><td>170.8</td><td>188.9</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>31-dec-2017</td><td>193.5</td><td>208.1</td><td>230.9</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the value of s&p financials in 2016?
Answer: 188.9
Question: what is the value in 2015?
Answer: 153.9
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: 35.0
Question: what was the 2015 number?
| 153.9 |
CONVFINQA_test583 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 65691 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2018 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2017 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>date</td><td>citi</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>s&p financials</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>31-dec-2012</td><td>100.0</td><td>100.0</td><td>100.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>31-dec-2013</td><td>131.8</td><td>132.4</td><td>135.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>31-dec-2014</td><td>137.0</td><td>150.5</td><td>156.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>31-dec-2015</td><td>131.4</td><td>152.6</td><td>153.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>31-dec-2016</td><td>152.3</td><td>170.8</td><td>188.9</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>31-dec-2017</td><td>193.5</td><td>208.1</td><td>230.9</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the value of s&p financials in 2016?
Answer: 188.9
Question: what is the value in 2015?
Answer: 153.9
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: 35.0
Question: what was the 2015 number?
Answer: 153.9
Question: what is the net change over the 2015 value?
| 0.22742 |
CONVFINQA_test584 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 1b . unresolved staff comments . item 2 . properties . our corporate co-headquarters are located in pittsburgh , pennsylvania and chicago , illinois . our co-headquarters are leased and house our executive offices , certain u.s . business units , and our administrative , finance , and human resource functions . we maintain additional owned and leased offices throughout the regions in which we operate . we manufacture our products in our network of manufacturing and processing facilities located throughout the world . as of december 31 , 2016 , we operated 87 manufacturing and processing facilities . we own 83 and lease four of these facilities . our manufacturing and processing facilities count by segment as of december 31 , 2016 was: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>owned</td><td>leased</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united states</td><td>43</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>canada</td><td>3</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>europe</td><td>11</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>rest of world</td><td>26</td><td>2</td></tr></table> we maintain all of our manufacturing and processing facilities in good condition and believe they are suitable and are adequate for our present needs . we also enter into co-manufacturing arrangements with third parties if we determine it is advantageous to outsource the production of any of our products . in the fourth quarter of 2016 , we reorganized our segment structure to move our russia business from the rest of world segment to the europe segment . we have reflected this change in the table above . see note 18 , segment reporting , to the consolidated financial statements for additional information . several of our current manufacturing and processing facilities are scheduled to be closed within the next year . see note 3 , integration and restructuring expenses , to the consolidated financial statements for additional information . item 3 . legal proceedings . we are routinely involved in legal proceedings , claims , and governmental inquiries , inspections or investigations ( 201clegal matters 201d ) arising in the ordinary course of our business . on april 1 , 2015 , the commodity futures trading commission ( 201ccftc 201d ) filed a formal complaint against mondel 0113z international ( formerly known as kraft foods inc. ) and kraft in the u.s . district court for the northern district of illinois , eastern division , related to activities involving the trading of december 2011 wheat futures contracts . the complaint alleges that mondel 0113z international and kraft ( 1 ) manipulated or attempted to manipulate the wheat markets during the fall of 2011 , ( 2 ) violated position limit levels for wheat futures , and ( 3 ) engaged in non-competitive trades by trading both sides of exchange-for-physical chicago board of trade wheat contracts . as previously disclosed by kraft , these activities arose prior to the october 1 , 2012 spin-off of kraft by mondel 0113z international to its shareholders and involve the business now owned and operated by mondel 0113z international or its affiliates . the separation and distribution agreement between kraft and mondel 0113z international , dated as of september 27 , 2012 , governs the allocation of liabilities between mondel 0113z international and kraft and , accordingly , mondel 0113z international will predominantly bear the costs of this matter and any monetary penalties or other payments that the cftc may impose . we do not expect this matter to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition , results of operations , or business . while we cannot predict with certainty the results of legal matters in which we are currently involved or may in the future be involved , we do not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve any of the legal matters that are currently pending will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations . item 4 . mine safety disclosures . not applicable. .
Question: what portion of the company owned facilities are in europe?
| 0.13253 |
CONVFINQA_test585 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 1b . unresolved staff comments . item 2 . properties . our corporate co-headquarters are located in pittsburgh , pennsylvania and chicago , illinois . our co-headquarters are leased and house our executive offices , certain u.s . business units , and our administrative , finance , and human resource functions . we maintain additional owned and leased offices throughout the regions in which we operate . we manufacture our products in our network of manufacturing and processing facilities located throughout the world . as of december 31 , 2016 , we operated 87 manufacturing and processing facilities . we own 83 and lease four of these facilities . our manufacturing and processing facilities count by segment as of december 31 , 2016 was: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>owned</td><td>leased</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united states</td><td>43</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>canada</td><td>3</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>europe</td><td>11</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>rest of world</td><td>26</td><td>2</td></tr></table> we maintain all of our manufacturing and processing facilities in good condition and believe they are suitable and are adequate for our present needs . we also enter into co-manufacturing arrangements with third parties if we determine it is advantageous to outsource the production of any of our products . in the fourth quarter of 2016 , we reorganized our segment structure to move our russia business from the rest of world segment to the europe segment . we have reflected this change in the table above . see note 18 , segment reporting , to the consolidated financial statements for additional information . several of our current manufacturing and processing facilities are scheduled to be closed within the next year . see note 3 , integration and restructuring expenses , to the consolidated financial statements for additional information . item 3 . legal proceedings . we are routinely involved in legal proceedings , claims , and governmental inquiries , inspections or investigations ( 201clegal matters 201d ) arising in the ordinary course of our business . on april 1 , 2015 , the commodity futures trading commission ( 201ccftc 201d ) filed a formal complaint against mondel 0113z international ( formerly known as kraft foods inc. ) and kraft in the u.s . district court for the northern district of illinois , eastern division , related to activities involving the trading of december 2011 wheat futures contracts . the complaint alleges that mondel 0113z international and kraft ( 1 ) manipulated or attempted to manipulate the wheat markets during the fall of 2011 , ( 2 ) violated position limit levels for wheat futures , and ( 3 ) engaged in non-competitive trades by trading both sides of exchange-for-physical chicago board of trade wheat contracts . as previously disclosed by kraft , these activities arose prior to the october 1 , 2012 spin-off of kraft by mondel 0113z international to its shareholders and involve the business now owned and operated by mondel 0113z international or its affiliates . the separation and distribution agreement between kraft and mondel 0113z international , dated as of september 27 , 2012 , governs the allocation of liabilities between mondel 0113z international and kraft and , accordingly , mondel 0113z international will predominantly bear the costs of this matter and any monetary penalties or other payments that the cftc may impose . we do not expect this matter to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition , results of operations , or business . while we cannot predict with certainty the results of legal matters in which we are currently involved or may in the future be involved , we do not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve any of the legal matters that are currently pending will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations . item 4 . mine safety disclosures . not applicable. .
Question: what portion of the company owned facilities are in europe?
Answer: 0.13253
Question: at 12/31/16 what percentage of manufacturing and processing facilities are leased?
| 0.04598 |
CONVFINQA_test586 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
impairment the following table presents net unrealized losses on securities available for sale as of december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fair value</td><td>$ 99832</td><td>$ 81881</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amortized cost</td><td>100013</td><td>82329</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net unrealized loss pre-tax</td><td>$ -181 ( 181 )</td><td>$ -448 ( 448 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net unrealized loss after-tax</td><td>$ -113 ( 113 )</td><td>$ -270 ( 270 )</td></tr></table> the net unrealized amounts presented above excluded the remaining net unrealized losses related to reclassifications of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity . these unrealized losses related to reclassifications totaled $ 303 million , or $ 189 million after-tax , and $ 523 million , or $ 317 million after-tax , as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , and were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income , or oci . refer to note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 . the decline in these remaining after-tax unrealized losses related to reclassifications from december 31 , 2010 to december 31 , 2011 resulted primarily from amortization . we conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether other-than-temporary impairment exists . to the extent that other-than-temporary impairment is identified , the impairment is broken into a credit component and a non-credit component . the credit component is recorded in our consolidated statement of income , and the non-credit component is recorded in oci to the extent that we do not intend to sell the security . our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment involves an evaluation , more fully described in note 3 , of economic and security-specific factors . such factors are based on estimates , derived by management , which contemplate current market conditions and security-specific performance . to the extent that market conditions are worse than management 2019s expectations , other-than-temporary impairment could increase , in particular , the credit component that would be recorded in our consolidated statement of income . given the exposure of our investment securities portfolio , particularly mortgage- and asset-backed securities , to residential mortgage and other consumer credit risks , the performance of the u.s . housing market is a significant driver of the portfolio 2019s credit performance . as such , our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment relies to a significant extent on our estimates of trends in national housing prices . generally , indices that measure trends in national housing prices are published in arrears . as of september 30 , 2011 , national housing prices , according to the case-shiller national home price index , had declined by approximately 31.3% ( 31.3 % ) peak-to-current . overall , management 2019s expectation , for purposes of its evaluation of other-than-temporary impairment as of december 31 , 2011 , was that housing prices would decline by approximately 35% ( 35 % ) peak-to-trough . the performance of certain mortgage products and vintages of securities continues to deteriorate . in addition , management continues to believe that housing prices will decline further as indicated above . the combination of these factors has led to an increase in management 2019s overall loss expectations . our investment portfolio continues to be sensitive to management 2019s estimates of future cumulative losses . ultimately , other-than- temporary impairment is based on specific cusip-level detailed analysis of the unique characteristics of each security . in addition , we perform sensitivity analysis across each significant product type within the non-agency u.s . residential mortgage-backed portfolio . we estimate , for example , that other-than-temporary impairment of the investment portfolio could increase by approximately $ 10 million to $ 50 million , if national housing prices were to decline by 37% ( 37 % ) to 39% ( 39 % ) peak-to-trough , compared to management 2019s expectation of 35% ( 35 % ) described above . this sensitivity estimate is based on a number of factors , including , but not limited to , the level of housing prices and the timing of defaults . to the extent that such factors differ substantially from management 2019s current expectations , resulting loss estimates may differ materially from those stated . excluding the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded in 2011 , management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the remaining .
Question: what was the total of unrealized losses related to reclassifications in 2011, before tax?
| 303.0 |
CONVFINQA_test587 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
impairment the following table presents net unrealized losses on securities available for sale as of december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fair value</td><td>$ 99832</td><td>$ 81881</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amortized cost</td><td>100013</td><td>82329</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net unrealized loss pre-tax</td><td>$ -181 ( 181 )</td><td>$ -448 ( 448 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net unrealized loss after-tax</td><td>$ -113 ( 113 )</td><td>$ -270 ( 270 )</td></tr></table> the net unrealized amounts presented above excluded the remaining net unrealized losses related to reclassifications of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity . these unrealized losses related to reclassifications totaled $ 303 million , or $ 189 million after-tax , and $ 523 million , or $ 317 million after-tax , as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , and were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income , or oci . refer to note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 . the decline in these remaining after-tax unrealized losses related to reclassifications from december 31 , 2010 to december 31 , 2011 resulted primarily from amortization . we conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether other-than-temporary impairment exists . to the extent that other-than-temporary impairment is identified , the impairment is broken into a credit component and a non-credit component . the credit component is recorded in our consolidated statement of income , and the non-credit component is recorded in oci to the extent that we do not intend to sell the security . our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment involves an evaluation , more fully described in note 3 , of economic and security-specific factors . such factors are based on estimates , derived by management , which contemplate current market conditions and security-specific performance . to the extent that market conditions are worse than management 2019s expectations , other-than-temporary impairment could increase , in particular , the credit component that would be recorded in our consolidated statement of income . given the exposure of our investment securities portfolio , particularly mortgage- and asset-backed securities , to residential mortgage and other consumer credit risks , the performance of the u.s . housing market is a significant driver of the portfolio 2019s credit performance . as such , our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment relies to a significant extent on our estimates of trends in national housing prices . generally , indices that measure trends in national housing prices are published in arrears . as of september 30 , 2011 , national housing prices , according to the case-shiller national home price index , had declined by approximately 31.3% ( 31.3 % ) peak-to-current . overall , management 2019s expectation , for purposes of its evaluation of other-than-temporary impairment as of december 31 , 2011 , was that housing prices would decline by approximately 35% ( 35 % ) peak-to-trough . the performance of certain mortgage products and vintages of securities continues to deteriorate . in addition , management continues to believe that housing prices will decline further as indicated above . the combination of these factors has led to an increase in management 2019s overall loss expectations . our investment portfolio continues to be sensitive to management 2019s estimates of future cumulative losses . ultimately , other-than- temporary impairment is based on specific cusip-level detailed analysis of the unique characteristics of each security . in addition , we perform sensitivity analysis across each significant product type within the non-agency u.s . residential mortgage-backed portfolio . we estimate , for example , that other-than-temporary impairment of the investment portfolio could increase by approximately $ 10 million to $ 50 million , if national housing prices were to decline by 37% ( 37 % ) to 39% ( 39 % ) peak-to-trough , compared to management 2019s expectation of 35% ( 35 % ) described above . this sensitivity estimate is based on a number of factors , including , but not limited to , the level of housing prices and the timing of defaults . to the extent that such factors differ substantially from management 2019s current expectations , resulting loss estimates may differ materially from those stated . excluding the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded in 2011 , management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the remaining .
Question: what was the total of unrealized losses related to reclassifications in 2011, before tax?
Answer: 303.0
Question: and what was it after tax?
| 189.0 |
CONVFINQA_test588 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
impairment the following table presents net unrealized losses on securities available for sale as of december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fair value</td><td>$ 99832</td><td>$ 81881</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amortized cost</td><td>100013</td><td>82329</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net unrealized loss pre-tax</td><td>$ -181 ( 181 )</td><td>$ -448 ( 448 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net unrealized loss after-tax</td><td>$ -113 ( 113 )</td><td>$ -270 ( 270 )</td></tr></table> the net unrealized amounts presented above excluded the remaining net unrealized losses related to reclassifications of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity . these unrealized losses related to reclassifications totaled $ 303 million , or $ 189 million after-tax , and $ 523 million , or $ 317 million after-tax , as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , and were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income , or oci . refer to note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 . the decline in these remaining after-tax unrealized losses related to reclassifications from december 31 , 2010 to december 31 , 2011 resulted primarily from amortization . we conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether other-than-temporary impairment exists . to the extent that other-than-temporary impairment is identified , the impairment is broken into a credit component and a non-credit component . the credit component is recorded in our consolidated statement of income , and the non-credit component is recorded in oci to the extent that we do not intend to sell the security . our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment involves an evaluation , more fully described in note 3 , of economic and security-specific factors . such factors are based on estimates , derived by management , which contemplate current market conditions and security-specific performance . to the extent that market conditions are worse than management 2019s expectations , other-than-temporary impairment could increase , in particular , the credit component that would be recorded in our consolidated statement of income . given the exposure of our investment securities portfolio , particularly mortgage- and asset-backed securities , to residential mortgage and other consumer credit risks , the performance of the u.s . housing market is a significant driver of the portfolio 2019s credit performance . as such , our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment relies to a significant extent on our estimates of trends in national housing prices . generally , indices that measure trends in national housing prices are published in arrears . as of september 30 , 2011 , national housing prices , according to the case-shiller national home price index , had declined by approximately 31.3% ( 31.3 % ) peak-to-current . overall , management 2019s expectation , for purposes of its evaluation of other-than-temporary impairment as of december 31 , 2011 , was that housing prices would decline by approximately 35% ( 35 % ) peak-to-trough . the performance of certain mortgage products and vintages of securities continues to deteriorate . in addition , management continues to believe that housing prices will decline further as indicated above . the combination of these factors has led to an increase in management 2019s overall loss expectations . our investment portfolio continues to be sensitive to management 2019s estimates of future cumulative losses . ultimately , other-than- temporary impairment is based on specific cusip-level detailed analysis of the unique characteristics of each security . in addition , we perform sensitivity analysis across each significant product type within the non-agency u.s . residential mortgage-backed portfolio . we estimate , for example , that other-than-temporary impairment of the investment portfolio could increase by approximately $ 10 million to $ 50 million , if national housing prices were to decline by 37% ( 37 % ) to 39% ( 39 % ) peak-to-trough , compared to management 2019s expectation of 35% ( 35 % ) described above . this sensitivity estimate is based on a number of factors , including , but not limited to , the level of housing prices and the timing of defaults . to the extent that such factors differ substantially from management 2019s current expectations , resulting loss estimates may differ materially from those stated . excluding the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded in 2011 , management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the remaining .
Question: what was the total of unrealized losses related to reclassifications in 2011, before tax?
Answer: 303.0
Question: and what was it after tax?
Answer: 189.0
Question: what was, then, the impact of the tax on that total?
| 114.0 |
CONVFINQA_test589 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
impairment the following table presents net unrealized losses on securities available for sale as of december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fair value</td><td>$ 99832</td><td>$ 81881</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amortized cost</td><td>100013</td><td>82329</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net unrealized loss pre-tax</td><td>$ -181 ( 181 )</td><td>$ -448 ( 448 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net unrealized loss after-tax</td><td>$ -113 ( 113 )</td><td>$ -270 ( 270 )</td></tr></table> the net unrealized amounts presented above excluded the remaining net unrealized losses related to reclassifications of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity . these unrealized losses related to reclassifications totaled $ 303 million , or $ 189 million after-tax , and $ 523 million , or $ 317 million after-tax , as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , and were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income , or oci . refer to note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 . the decline in these remaining after-tax unrealized losses related to reclassifications from december 31 , 2010 to december 31 , 2011 resulted primarily from amortization . we conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether other-than-temporary impairment exists . to the extent that other-than-temporary impairment is identified , the impairment is broken into a credit component and a non-credit component . the credit component is recorded in our consolidated statement of income , and the non-credit component is recorded in oci to the extent that we do not intend to sell the security . our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment involves an evaluation , more fully described in note 3 , of economic and security-specific factors . such factors are based on estimates , derived by management , which contemplate current market conditions and security-specific performance . to the extent that market conditions are worse than management 2019s expectations , other-than-temporary impairment could increase , in particular , the credit component that would be recorded in our consolidated statement of income . given the exposure of our investment securities portfolio , particularly mortgage- and asset-backed securities , to residential mortgage and other consumer credit risks , the performance of the u.s . housing market is a significant driver of the portfolio 2019s credit performance . as such , our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment relies to a significant extent on our estimates of trends in national housing prices . generally , indices that measure trends in national housing prices are published in arrears . as of september 30 , 2011 , national housing prices , according to the case-shiller national home price index , had declined by approximately 31.3% ( 31.3 % ) peak-to-current . overall , management 2019s expectation , for purposes of its evaluation of other-than-temporary impairment as of december 31 , 2011 , was that housing prices would decline by approximately 35% ( 35 % ) peak-to-trough . the performance of certain mortgage products and vintages of securities continues to deteriorate . in addition , management continues to believe that housing prices will decline further as indicated above . the combination of these factors has led to an increase in management 2019s overall loss expectations . our investment portfolio continues to be sensitive to management 2019s estimates of future cumulative losses . ultimately , other-than- temporary impairment is based on specific cusip-level detailed analysis of the unique characteristics of each security . in addition , we perform sensitivity analysis across each significant product type within the non-agency u.s . residential mortgage-backed portfolio . we estimate , for example , that other-than-temporary impairment of the investment portfolio could increase by approximately $ 10 million to $ 50 million , if national housing prices were to decline by 37% ( 37 % ) to 39% ( 39 % ) peak-to-trough , compared to management 2019s expectation of 35% ( 35 % ) described above . this sensitivity estimate is based on a number of factors , including , but not limited to , the level of housing prices and the timing of defaults . to the extent that such factors differ substantially from management 2019s current expectations , resulting loss estimates may differ materially from those stated . excluding the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded in 2011 , management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the remaining .
Question: what was the total of unrealized losses related to reclassifications in 2011, before tax?
Answer: 303.0
Question: and what was it after tax?
Answer: 189.0
Question: what was, then, the impact of the tax on that total?
Answer: 114.0
Question: and between that year and the previous, 2010, what was the change in the fair value of the full unrealized losses?
| 17951.0 |
CONVFINQA_test590 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
impairment the following table presents net unrealized losses on securities available for sale as of december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fair value</td><td>$ 99832</td><td>$ 81881</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amortized cost</td><td>100013</td><td>82329</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net unrealized loss pre-tax</td><td>$ -181 ( 181 )</td><td>$ -448 ( 448 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net unrealized loss after-tax</td><td>$ -113 ( 113 )</td><td>$ -270 ( 270 )</td></tr></table> the net unrealized amounts presented above excluded the remaining net unrealized losses related to reclassifications of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity . these unrealized losses related to reclassifications totaled $ 303 million , or $ 189 million after-tax , and $ 523 million , or $ 317 million after-tax , as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , and were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income , or oci . refer to note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 . the decline in these remaining after-tax unrealized losses related to reclassifications from december 31 , 2010 to december 31 , 2011 resulted primarily from amortization . we conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether other-than-temporary impairment exists . to the extent that other-than-temporary impairment is identified , the impairment is broken into a credit component and a non-credit component . the credit component is recorded in our consolidated statement of income , and the non-credit component is recorded in oci to the extent that we do not intend to sell the security . our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment involves an evaluation , more fully described in note 3 , of economic and security-specific factors . such factors are based on estimates , derived by management , which contemplate current market conditions and security-specific performance . to the extent that market conditions are worse than management 2019s expectations , other-than-temporary impairment could increase , in particular , the credit component that would be recorded in our consolidated statement of income . given the exposure of our investment securities portfolio , particularly mortgage- and asset-backed securities , to residential mortgage and other consumer credit risks , the performance of the u.s . housing market is a significant driver of the portfolio 2019s credit performance . as such , our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment relies to a significant extent on our estimates of trends in national housing prices . generally , indices that measure trends in national housing prices are published in arrears . as of september 30 , 2011 , national housing prices , according to the case-shiller national home price index , had declined by approximately 31.3% ( 31.3 % ) peak-to-current . overall , management 2019s expectation , for purposes of its evaluation of other-than-temporary impairment as of december 31 , 2011 , was that housing prices would decline by approximately 35% ( 35 % ) peak-to-trough . the performance of certain mortgage products and vintages of securities continues to deteriorate . in addition , management continues to believe that housing prices will decline further as indicated above . the combination of these factors has led to an increase in management 2019s overall loss expectations . our investment portfolio continues to be sensitive to management 2019s estimates of future cumulative losses . ultimately , other-than- temporary impairment is based on specific cusip-level detailed analysis of the unique characteristics of each security . in addition , we perform sensitivity analysis across each significant product type within the non-agency u.s . residential mortgage-backed portfolio . we estimate , for example , that other-than-temporary impairment of the investment portfolio could increase by approximately $ 10 million to $ 50 million , if national housing prices were to decline by 37% ( 37 % ) to 39% ( 39 % ) peak-to-trough , compared to management 2019s expectation of 35% ( 35 % ) described above . this sensitivity estimate is based on a number of factors , including , but not limited to , the level of housing prices and the timing of defaults . to the extent that such factors differ substantially from management 2019s current expectations , resulting loss estimates may differ materially from those stated . excluding the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded in 2011 , management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the remaining .
Question: what was the total of unrealized losses related to reclassifications in 2011, before tax?
Answer: 303.0
Question: and what was it after tax?
Answer: 189.0
Question: what was, then, the impact of the tax on that total?
Answer: 114.0
Question: and between that year and the previous, 2010, what was the change in the fair value of the full unrealized losses?
Answer: 17951.0
Question: what is this change as a percentage of that fair value in 2010?
| 0.21923 |
CONVFINQA_test591 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 5 . market for the registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following graph compares annual total return of our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and our peer group ( 201cloews peer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2015 . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , the s&p 500 index and the loews peer group was $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 and that all dividends were reinvested. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>loews common stock</td><td>100.0</td><td>97.37</td><td>106.04</td><td>126.23</td><td>110.59</td><td>101.72</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.0</td><td>102.11</td><td>118.45</td><td>156.82</td><td>178.29</td><td>180.75</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>loews peer group ( a )</td><td>100.0</td><td>101.59</td><td>115.19</td><td>145.12</td><td>152.84</td><td>144.70</td></tr></table> ( a ) the loews peer group consists of the following companies that are industry competitors of our principal operating subsidiaries : ace limited , w.r . berkley corporation , the chubb corporation , energy transfer partners l.p. , ensco plc , the hartford financial services group , inc. , kinder morgan energy partners , l.p . ( included through november 26 , 2014 when it was acquired by kinder morgan inc. ) , noble corporation , spectra energy corp , transocean ltd . and the travelers companies , inc . dividend information we have paid quarterly cash dividends on loews common stock in each year since 1967 . regular dividends of $ 0.0625 per share of loews common stock were paid in each calendar quarter of 2015 and 2014. .
Question: what is the value of loews common stock in 2011 less 100?
| -2.63 |
CONVFINQA_test592 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 5 . market for the registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following graph compares annual total return of our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and our peer group ( 201cloews peer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2015 . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , the s&p 500 index and the loews peer group was $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 and that all dividends were reinvested. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>loews common stock</td><td>100.0</td><td>97.37</td><td>106.04</td><td>126.23</td><td>110.59</td><td>101.72</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.0</td><td>102.11</td><td>118.45</td><td>156.82</td><td>178.29</td><td>180.75</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>loews peer group ( a )</td><td>100.0</td><td>101.59</td><td>115.19</td><td>145.12</td><td>152.84</td><td>144.70</td></tr></table> ( a ) the loews peer group consists of the following companies that are industry competitors of our principal operating subsidiaries : ace limited , w.r . berkley corporation , the chubb corporation , energy transfer partners l.p. , ensco plc , the hartford financial services group , inc. , kinder morgan energy partners , l.p . ( included through november 26 , 2014 when it was acquired by kinder morgan inc. ) , noble corporation , spectra energy corp , transocean ltd . and the travelers companies , inc . dividend information we have paid quarterly cash dividends on loews common stock in each year since 1967 . regular dividends of $ 0.0625 per share of loews common stock were paid in each calendar quarter of 2015 and 2014. .
Question: what is the value of loews common stock in 2011 less 100?
Answer: -2.63
Question: what is that divided by 100?
| -0.0263 |
CONVFINQA_test593 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
with apb no . 25 . instead , companies will be required to account for such transactions using a fair-value method and recognize the related expense associated with share-based payments in the statement of operations . sfas 123r is effective for us as of january 1 , 2006 . we have historically accounted for share-based payments to employees under apb no . 25 2019s intrinsic value method . as such , we generally have not recognized compensation expense for options granted to employees . we will adopt the provisions of sfas 123r under the modified prospective method , in which compensation cost for all share-based payments granted or modified after the effective date is recognized based upon the requirements of sfas 123r , and compensation cost for all awards granted to employees prior to the effective date that are unvested as of the effective date of sfas 123r is recognized based on sfas 123 . tax benefits will be recognized related to the cost for share-based payments to the extent the equity instrument would ordinarily result in a future tax deduction under existing law . tax expense will be recognized to write off excess deferred tax assets when the tax deduction upon settlement of a vested option is less than the expense recorded in the statement of operations ( to the extent not offset by prior tax credits for settlements where the tax deduction was greater than the fair value cost ) . we estimate that we will recognize equity-based compensation expense of approximately $ 35 million to $ 38 million for the year ending december 31 , 2006 . this amount is subject to revisions as we finalize certain assumptions related to 2006 , including the size and nature of awards and forfeiture rates . sfas 123r also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost be reported as a financing cash flow rather than as operating cash flow as was previously required . we cannot estimate what the future tax benefits will be as the amounts depend on , among other factors , future employee stock option exercises . due to the our tax loss position , there was no operating cash inflow realized for december 31 , 2005 and 2004 for such excess tax deductions . in march 2005 , the sec issued staff accounting bulletin ( sab ) no . 107 regarding the staff 2019s interpretation of sfas 123r . this interpretation provides the staff 2019s views regarding interactions between sfas 123r and certain sec rules and regulations and provides interpretations of the valuation of share-based payments for public companies . the interpretive guidance is intended to assist companies in applying the provisions of sfas 123r and investors and users of the financial statements in analyzing the information provided . we will follow the guidance prescribed in sab no . 107 in connection with our adoption of sfas 123r . information presented pursuant to the indentures of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes , 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes and ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) the following table sets forth information that is presented solely to address certain tower cash flow reporting requirements contained in the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes , 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes and ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes . the information contained in note 19 to our consolidated financial statements is also presented to address certain reporting requirements contained in the indenture for our ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes . the following table presents tower cash flow , adjusted consolidated cash flow and non-tower cash flow for the company and its restricted subsidiaries , as defined in the indentures for the applicable notes ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2005</td><td>$ 139590</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005</td><td>$ 498266</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less : tower cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005</td><td>-524804 ( 524804 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>plus : four times tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2005</td><td>558360</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>adjusted consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005</td><td>$ 531822</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>non-tower cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005</td><td>$ -30584 ( 30584 )</td></tr></table> .
Question: in the year of 2005, what was the total amount of the non-tower cash flow?
| -30584.0 |
CONVFINQA_test594 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
with apb no . 25 . instead , companies will be required to account for such transactions using a fair-value method and recognize the related expense associated with share-based payments in the statement of operations . sfas 123r is effective for us as of january 1 , 2006 . we have historically accounted for share-based payments to employees under apb no . 25 2019s intrinsic value method . as such , we generally have not recognized compensation expense for options granted to employees . we will adopt the provisions of sfas 123r under the modified prospective method , in which compensation cost for all share-based payments granted or modified after the effective date is recognized based upon the requirements of sfas 123r , and compensation cost for all awards granted to employees prior to the effective date that are unvested as of the effective date of sfas 123r is recognized based on sfas 123 . tax benefits will be recognized related to the cost for share-based payments to the extent the equity instrument would ordinarily result in a future tax deduction under existing law . tax expense will be recognized to write off excess deferred tax assets when the tax deduction upon settlement of a vested option is less than the expense recorded in the statement of operations ( to the extent not offset by prior tax credits for settlements where the tax deduction was greater than the fair value cost ) . we estimate that we will recognize equity-based compensation expense of approximately $ 35 million to $ 38 million for the year ending december 31 , 2006 . this amount is subject to revisions as we finalize certain assumptions related to 2006 , including the size and nature of awards and forfeiture rates . sfas 123r also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost be reported as a financing cash flow rather than as operating cash flow as was previously required . we cannot estimate what the future tax benefits will be as the amounts depend on , among other factors , future employee stock option exercises . due to the our tax loss position , there was no operating cash inflow realized for december 31 , 2005 and 2004 for such excess tax deductions . in march 2005 , the sec issued staff accounting bulletin ( sab ) no . 107 regarding the staff 2019s interpretation of sfas 123r . this interpretation provides the staff 2019s views regarding interactions between sfas 123r and certain sec rules and regulations and provides interpretations of the valuation of share-based payments for public companies . the interpretive guidance is intended to assist companies in applying the provisions of sfas 123r and investors and users of the financial statements in analyzing the information provided . we will follow the guidance prescribed in sab no . 107 in connection with our adoption of sfas 123r . information presented pursuant to the indentures of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes , 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes and ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) the following table sets forth information that is presented solely to address certain tower cash flow reporting requirements contained in the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes , 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes and ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes . the information contained in note 19 to our consolidated financial statements is also presented to address certain reporting requirements contained in the indenture for our ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes . the following table presents tower cash flow , adjusted consolidated cash flow and non-tower cash flow for the company and its restricted subsidiaries , as defined in the indentures for the applicable notes ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2005</td><td>$ 139590</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005</td><td>$ 498266</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less : tower cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005</td><td>-524804 ( 524804 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>plus : four times tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2005</td><td>558360</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>adjusted consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005</td><td>$ 531822</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>non-tower cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005</td><td>$ -30584 ( 30584 )</td></tr></table> .
Question: in the year of 2005, what was the total amount of the non-tower cash flow?
Answer: -30584.0
Question: and what was the adjusted consolidated cash flow?
| 531822.0 |
CONVFINQA_test595 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
with apb no . 25 . instead , companies will be required to account for such transactions using a fair-value method and recognize the related expense associated with share-based payments in the statement of operations . sfas 123r is effective for us as of january 1 , 2006 . we have historically accounted for share-based payments to employees under apb no . 25 2019s intrinsic value method . as such , we generally have not recognized compensation expense for options granted to employees . we will adopt the provisions of sfas 123r under the modified prospective method , in which compensation cost for all share-based payments granted or modified after the effective date is recognized based upon the requirements of sfas 123r , and compensation cost for all awards granted to employees prior to the effective date that are unvested as of the effective date of sfas 123r is recognized based on sfas 123 . tax benefits will be recognized related to the cost for share-based payments to the extent the equity instrument would ordinarily result in a future tax deduction under existing law . tax expense will be recognized to write off excess deferred tax assets when the tax deduction upon settlement of a vested option is less than the expense recorded in the statement of operations ( to the extent not offset by prior tax credits for settlements where the tax deduction was greater than the fair value cost ) . we estimate that we will recognize equity-based compensation expense of approximately $ 35 million to $ 38 million for the year ending december 31 , 2006 . this amount is subject to revisions as we finalize certain assumptions related to 2006 , including the size and nature of awards and forfeiture rates . sfas 123r also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost be reported as a financing cash flow rather than as operating cash flow as was previously required . we cannot estimate what the future tax benefits will be as the amounts depend on , among other factors , future employee stock option exercises . due to the our tax loss position , there was no operating cash inflow realized for december 31 , 2005 and 2004 for such excess tax deductions . in march 2005 , the sec issued staff accounting bulletin ( sab ) no . 107 regarding the staff 2019s interpretation of sfas 123r . this interpretation provides the staff 2019s views regarding interactions between sfas 123r and certain sec rules and regulations and provides interpretations of the valuation of share-based payments for public companies . the interpretive guidance is intended to assist companies in applying the provisions of sfas 123r and investors and users of the financial statements in analyzing the information provided . we will follow the guidance prescribed in sab no . 107 in connection with our adoption of sfas 123r . information presented pursuant to the indentures of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes , 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes and ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) the following table sets forth information that is presented solely to address certain tower cash flow reporting requirements contained in the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes , 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes and ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes . the information contained in note 19 to our consolidated financial statements is also presented to address certain reporting requirements contained in the indenture for our ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes . the following table presents tower cash flow , adjusted consolidated cash flow and non-tower cash flow for the company and its restricted subsidiaries , as defined in the indentures for the applicable notes ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2005</td><td>$ 139590</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005</td><td>$ 498266</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less : tower cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005</td><td>-524804 ( 524804 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>plus : four times tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2005</td><td>558360</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>adjusted consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005</td><td>$ 531822</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>non-tower cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005</td><td>$ -30584 ( 30584 )</td></tr></table> .
Question: in the year of 2005, what was the total amount of the non-tower cash flow?
Answer: -30584.0
Question: and what was the adjusted consolidated cash flow?
Answer: 531822.0
Question: what, then, was that amount as a portion of this adjusted cash flow?
| -0.05751 |
CONVFINQA_test596 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
with apb no . 25 . instead , companies will be required to account for such transactions using a fair-value method and recognize the related expense associated with share-based payments in the statement of operations . sfas 123r is effective for us as of january 1 , 2006 . we have historically accounted for share-based payments to employees under apb no . 25 2019s intrinsic value method . as such , we generally have not recognized compensation expense for options granted to employees . we will adopt the provisions of sfas 123r under the modified prospective method , in which compensation cost for all share-based payments granted or modified after the effective date is recognized based upon the requirements of sfas 123r , and compensation cost for all awards granted to employees prior to the effective date that are unvested as of the effective date of sfas 123r is recognized based on sfas 123 . tax benefits will be recognized related to the cost for share-based payments to the extent the equity instrument would ordinarily result in a future tax deduction under existing law . tax expense will be recognized to write off excess deferred tax assets when the tax deduction upon settlement of a vested option is less than the expense recorded in the statement of operations ( to the extent not offset by prior tax credits for settlements where the tax deduction was greater than the fair value cost ) . we estimate that we will recognize equity-based compensation expense of approximately $ 35 million to $ 38 million for the year ending december 31 , 2006 . this amount is subject to revisions as we finalize certain assumptions related to 2006 , including the size and nature of awards and forfeiture rates . sfas 123r also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost be reported as a financing cash flow rather than as operating cash flow as was previously required . we cannot estimate what the future tax benefits will be as the amounts depend on , among other factors , future employee stock option exercises . due to the our tax loss position , there was no operating cash inflow realized for december 31 , 2005 and 2004 for such excess tax deductions . in march 2005 , the sec issued staff accounting bulletin ( sab ) no . 107 regarding the staff 2019s interpretation of sfas 123r . this interpretation provides the staff 2019s views regarding interactions between sfas 123r and certain sec rules and regulations and provides interpretations of the valuation of share-based payments for public companies . the interpretive guidance is intended to assist companies in applying the provisions of sfas 123r and investors and users of the financial statements in analyzing the information provided . we will follow the guidance prescribed in sab no . 107 in connection with our adoption of sfas 123r . information presented pursuant to the indentures of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes , 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes and ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) the following table sets forth information that is presented solely to address certain tower cash flow reporting requirements contained in the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes , 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes and ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes . the information contained in note 19 to our consolidated financial statements is also presented to address certain reporting requirements contained in the indenture for our ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes . the following table presents tower cash flow , adjusted consolidated cash flow and non-tower cash flow for the company and its restricted subsidiaries , as defined in the indentures for the applicable notes ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2005</td><td>$ 139590</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005</td><td>$ 498266</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less : tower cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005</td><td>-524804 ( 524804 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>plus : four times tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2005</td><td>558360</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>adjusted consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005</td><td>$ 531822</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>non-tower cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005</td><td>$ -30584 ( 30584 )</td></tr></table> .
Question: in the year of 2005, what was the total amount of the non-tower cash flow?
Answer: -30584.0
Question: and what was the adjusted consolidated cash flow?
Answer: 531822.0
Question: what, then, was that amount as a portion of this adjusted cash flow?
Answer: -0.05751
Question: and what was the tower cash flow also as a portion of it?
| 1.0499 |
CONVFINQA_test597 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) a description of the company 2019s reporting units and the results of the related transitional impairment testing are as follows : verestar 2014verestar was a single segment and reporting unit until december 2002 , when the company committed to a plan to dispose of verestar . the company recorded an impairment charge of $ 189.3 million relating to the impairment of goodwill in this reporting unit . the fair value of this reporting unit was determined based on an independent third party appraisal . network development services 2014as of january 1 , 2002 , the reporting units in the company 2019s network development services segment included kline , specialty constructors , galaxy , mts components and flash technologies . the company estimated the fair value of these reporting units utilizing future discounted cash flows and market information as to the value of each reporting unit on january 1 , 2002 . the company recorded an impairment charge of $ 387.8 million for the year ended december 31 , 2002 related to the impairment of goodwill within these reporting units . such charge included full impairment for all of the goodwill within the reporting units except kline , for which only a partial impairment was recorded . as discussed in note 2 , the assets of all of these reporting units were sold as of december 31 , 2003 , except for those of kline and our tower construction services unit , which were sold in march and november 2004 , respectively . rental and management 2014the company obtained an independent third party appraisal of the rental and management reporting unit that contains goodwill and determined that goodwill was not impaired . the company 2019s other intangible assets subject to amortization consist of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>acquired customer base and network location intangibles</td><td>$ 1369607</td><td>$ 1299521</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deferred financing costs</td><td>89736</td><td>111484</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>acquired licenses and other intangibles</td><td>43404</td><td>43125</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>1502747</td><td>1454130</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>less accumulated amortization</td><td>-517444 ( 517444 )</td><td>-434381 ( 434381 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other intangible assets net</td><td>$ 985303</td><td>$ 1019749</td></tr></table> the company amortizes its intangible assets over periods ranging from three to fifteen years . amortization of intangible assets for the years ended december 31 , 2004 and 2003 aggregated approximately $ 97.8 million and $ 94.6 million , respectively ( excluding amortization of deferred financing costs , which is included in interest expense ) . the company expects to record amortization expense of approximately $ 97.8 million , $ 95.9 million , $ 92.0 million , $ 90.5 million and $ 88.8 million , respectively , for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2006 , 2007 , 2008 and 2009 , respectively . 5 . notes receivable in 2000 , the company loaned tv azteca , s.a . de c.v . ( tv azteca ) , the owner of a major national television network in mexico , $ 119.8 million . the loan , which initially bore interest at 12.87% ( 12.87 % ) , payable quarterly , was discounted by the company , as the fair value interest rate at the date of the loan was determined to be 14.25% ( 14.25 % ) . the loan was amended effective january 1 , 2003 to increase the original interest rate to 13.11% ( 13.11 % ) . as of december 31 , 2004 , and 2003 , approximately $ 119.8 million undiscounted ( $ 108.2 million discounted ) under the loan was outstanding and included in notes receivable and other long-term assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . the term of the loan is seventy years ; however , the loan may be prepaid by tv .
Question: what was the change in the amortization expense from 2007 to 2008?
| 3.9 |
CONVFINQA_test598 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) a description of the company 2019s reporting units and the results of the related transitional impairment testing are as follows : verestar 2014verestar was a single segment and reporting unit until december 2002 , when the company committed to a plan to dispose of verestar . the company recorded an impairment charge of $ 189.3 million relating to the impairment of goodwill in this reporting unit . the fair value of this reporting unit was determined based on an independent third party appraisal . network development services 2014as of january 1 , 2002 , the reporting units in the company 2019s network development services segment included kline , specialty constructors , galaxy , mts components and flash technologies . the company estimated the fair value of these reporting units utilizing future discounted cash flows and market information as to the value of each reporting unit on january 1 , 2002 . the company recorded an impairment charge of $ 387.8 million for the year ended december 31 , 2002 related to the impairment of goodwill within these reporting units . such charge included full impairment for all of the goodwill within the reporting units except kline , for which only a partial impairment was recorded . as discussed in note 2 , the assets of all of these reporting units were sold as of december 31 , 2003 , except for those of kline and our tower construction services unit , which were sold in march and november 2004 , respectively . rental and management 2014the company obtained an independent third party appraisal of the rental and management reporting unit that contains goodwill and determined that goodwill was not impaired . the company 2019s other intangible assets subject to amortization consist of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>acquired customer base and network location intangibles</td><td>$ 1369607</td><td>$ 1299521</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deferred financing costs</td><td>89736</td><td>111484</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>acquired licenses and other intangibles</td><td>43404</td><td>43125</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>1502747</td><td>1454130</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>less accumulated amortization</td><td>-517444 ( 517444 )</td><td>-434381 ( 434381 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other intangible assets net</td><td>$ 985303</td><td>$ 1019749</td></tr></table> the company amortizes its intangible assets over periods ranging from three to fifteen years . amortization of intangible assets for the years ended december 31 , 2004 and 2003 aggregated approximately $ 97.8 million and $ 94.6 million , respectively ( excluding amortization of deferred financing costs , which is included in interest expense ) . the company expects to record amortization expense of approximately $ 97.8 million , $ 95.9 million , $ 92.0 million , $ 90.5 million and $ 88.8 million , respectively , for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2006 , 2007 , 2008 and 2009 , respectively . 5 . notes receivable in 2000 , the company loaned tv azteca , s.a . de c.v . ( tv azteca ) , the owner of a major national television network in mexico , $ 119.8 million . the loan , which initially bore interest at 12.87% ( 12.87 % ) , payable quarterly , was discounted by the company , as the fair value interest rate at the date of the loan was determined to be 14.25% ( 14.25 % ) . the loan was amended effective january 1 , 2003 to increase the original interest rate to 13.11% ( 13.11 % ) . as of december 31 , 2004 , and 2003 , approximately $ 119.8 million undiscounted ( $ 108.2 million discounted ) under the loan was outstanding and included in notes receivable and other long-term assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . the term of the loan is seventy years ; however , the loan may be prepaid by tv .
Question: what was the change in the amortization expense from 2007 to 2008?
Answer: 3.9
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to that amortization expense in 2007, in percentage?
| 0.04239 |
CONVFINQA_test599 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
south america . approximately 26% ( 26 % ) of 2017 net sales were to international markets . this segment sells directly through its own sales force and indirectly through independent manufacturers 2019 representatives , primarily to wholesalers , home centers , mass merchandisers and industrial distributors . in aggregate , sales to the home depot and lowe 2019s comprised approximately 23% ( 23 % ) of net sales of the plumbing segment in 2017 . this segment 2019s chief competitors include delta ( owned by masco ) , kohler , pfister ( owned by spectrum brands ) , american standard ( owned by lixil group ) , insinkerator ( owned by emerson electronic company ) and imported private-label brands . doors . our doors segment manufactures and sells fiberglass and steel entry door systems under the therma-tru brand and urethane millwork product lines under the fypon brand . this segment benefits from the long-term trend away from traditional materials , such as wood , steel and aluminum , toward more energy-efficient and durable synthetic materials . therma-tru products include fiberglass and steel residential entry door and patio door systems , primarily for sale in the u.s . and canada . this segment 2019s principal customers are home centers , millwork building products and wholesale distributors , and specialty dealers that provide products to the residential new construction market , as well as to the remodeling and renovation markets . in aggregate , sales to the home depot and lowe 2019s comprised approximately 14% ( 14 % ) of net sales of the doors segment in 2017 . this segment 2019s competitors include masonite , jeld-wen , plastpro and pella . security . our security segment 2019s products consist of locks , safety and security devices , and electronic security products manufactured , sourced and distributed primarily under the master lock brand and fire resistant safes , security containers and commercial cabinets manufactured , sourced and distributed under the sentrysafe brand . this segment sells products principally in the u.s. , canada , europe , central america , japan and australia . approximately 25% ( 25 % ) of 2017 net sales were to international markets . this segment manufactures and sells key-controlled and combination padlocks , bicycle and cable locks , built-in locker locks , door hardware , automotive , trailer and towing locks , electronic access control solutions , and other specialty safety and security devices for consumer use to hardware , home center and other retail outlets . in addition , the segment sells lock systems and fire resistant safes to locksmiths , industrial and institutional users , and original equipment manufacturers . in aggregate , sales to the home depot and lowe 2019s comprised approximately 18% ( 18 % ) of the net sales of the security segment in 2017 . master lock competes with abus , w.h . brady , hampton , kwikset ( owned by spectrum brands ) , schlage ( owned by allegion ) , assa abloy and various imports , and sentrysafe competes with first alert , magnum , fortress , stack-on and fire king . annual net sales for each of the last three fiscal years for each of our business segments were as follows : ( in millions ) 2017 2016 2015 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cabinets</td><td>$ 2467.1</td><td>$ 2397.8</td><td>$ 2173.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>plumbing</td><td>1720.8</td><td>1534.4</td><td>1414.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>doors</td><td>502.9</td><td>473.0</td><td>439.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>security</td><td>592.5</td><td>579.7</td><td>552.4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 5283.3</td><td>$ 4984.9</td><td>$ 4579.4</td></tr></table> for additional financial information for each of our business segments , refer to note 18 , 201cinformation on business segments , 201d to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this annual report on form other information raw materials . the table below indicates the principal raw materials used by each of our segments . these materials are available from a number of sources . volatility in the prices of commodities and energy used in making and distributing our products impacts the cost of manufacturing our products. .
Question: in the year of 2017, what percentage of the net sales were for international markets?
| 0.25 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.