Datasets:

JamBelg

/

Argilla_prompt_llm

like 0

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Left patellar chondromalacia.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Left patellar chondromalacia with tight lateral structures.,PROCEDURE:, Left knee arthroscopy with lateral capsular release.,ANESTHESIA: , Surgery performed under general anesthesia.,TOURNIQUET TIME: ,47 minutes.,MEDICATION: ,The patient received 0.5% Marcaine local anesthetic 32 mL.,COMPLICATIONS: , No intraoperative complications.,DRAINS AND SPECIMENS: , None.,HISTORY AND PHYSICAL: ,The patient is a 14-year-old girl who started having left knee pain in the fall of 2007. She was not seen in Orthopedic Clinic until November 2007. The patient had an outside MRI performed that demonstrated left patellar chondromalacia only. The patient was referred to physical therapy for patellar tracking exercises. She was also given a brace. The patient reported increasing pain with physical therapy and mother strongly desired other treatment. It was explained to the mother in detail that this is a difficult problem to treat although majority of the patients get better with physical therapy. Her failure with nonoperative treatment is below the standard 6-month trial; however, given her symptoms and severe pain, lateral capsular release was offered. Risk and benefits of surgery were discussed. Risks of surgery including risk of anesthesia, infection, bleeding, changes in sensation and motion extremity, failure of procedure to relieve pain, need for postoperative rehab, and significant postoperative swelling. All questions were answered, and mother and daughter agreed to the above plans.,PROCEDURE NOTE: , The patient was taken to the operating room and placed on the operating table. General anesthesia was then administered. The patient received Ancef preoperatively. A nonsterile tourniquet was placed on the upper aspect of left thigh. The extremity was then prepped and draped in the standard surgical fashion. A medial suprapatellar portal was marked on the skin as well as anteromedial and anterolateral joint line. The extremity was wrapped in Esmarch prior to inflation of tourniquet to 250 mmHg. Esmarch was then removed. Incisions were then made. Camera was initially inserted into the lateral joint line. Visualization of patellofemoral joint revealed type 2 chondromalacia with slight lateral subluxation. The patient did have congruent articulation about 30 degrees of knee flexion. Visualization of the medial joint line revealed no loose bodies. There was a small plica. Visualization of the medial joint line revealed no significant chondromalacia. Menisci was probed and tested with no signs of tears and instability. ACL was noted to be intact. The intercondylar notch and lateral joint line also revealed no significant chondromalacia or meniscal pathology. Lateral gutter also demonstrated no loose bodies or plica. The camera was then removed and inserted into the anteromedial portal using two 18-gauge needles. The extent of lateral capsular release was marked using a monopolar coblator, lateral capsular release was performed. The patient had significant improvement in anteromedial translation from 25% to 50%. At the end of the case, all instruments were removed. The knee was injected with 32 mL of 0.5% Marcaine with additional epinephrine. Please note, the patient received 30 mL of 1:500,000 dilution epinephrine at the beginning of the case. The portals were then closed using 4-0 Monocryl. The wound was clean and dry, and dressed with Steri-Strips, Xeroform, and 4 x 4s. The kneecap was translated medially under pressure and a bias placed. The tourniquet was released at 47 minutes. The patient was then placed in the knee immobilizer. The patient tolerated the procedure well and was subsequently extubated and taken to the recovery in stable condition.,POSTOPERATIVE PLAN: , The patient will weightbear as tolerated in the knee immobilizer. She will start physical therapy within 1 to 2 weeks to work on patella mobilization as well as reconditioning and strengthening. Intraoperative findings were relayed to the mother. All questions were answered.

preoperative diagnosis left patellar chondromalaciapostoperative diagnosis left patellar chondromalacia tight lateral structuresprocedure left knee arthroscopy lateral capsular releaseanesthesia surgery performed general anesthesiatourniquet time minutesmedication patient received marcaine local anesthetic mlcomplications intraoperative complicationsdrains specimens nonehistory physical patient yearold girl started left knee pain fall seen orthopedic clinic november patient outside mri performed demonstrated left patellar chondromalacia patient referred physical therapy patellar tracking exercises also given brace patient reported increasing pain physical therapy mother strongly desired treatment explained mother detail difficult problem treat although majority patients get better physical therapy failure nonoperative treatment standard month trial however given symptoms severe pain lateral capsular release offered risk benefits surgery discussed risks surgery including risk anesthesia infection bleeding changes sensation motion extremity failure procedure relieve pain need postoperative rehab significant postoperative swelling questions answered mother daughter agreed plansprocedure note patient taken operating room placed operating table general anesthesia administered patient received ancef preoperatively nonsterile tourniquet placed upper aspect left thigh extremity prepped draped standard surgical fashion medial suprapatellar portal marked skin well anteromedial anterolateral joint line extremity wrapped esmarch prior inflation tourniquet mmhg esmarch removed incisions made camera initially inserted lateral joint line visualization patellofemoral joint revealed type chondromalacia slight lateral subluxation patient congruent articulation degrees knee flexion visualization medial joint line revealed loose bodies small plica visualization medial joint line revealed significant chondromalacia menisci probed tested signs tears instability acl noted intact intercondylar notch lateral joint line also revealed significant chondromalacia meniscal pathology lateral gutter also demonstrated loose bodies plica camera removed inserted anteromedial portal using two gauge needles extent lateral capsular release marked using monopolar coblator lateral capsular release performed patient significant improvement anteromedial translation end case instruments removed knee injected ml marcaine additional epinephrine please note patient received ml dilution epinephrine beginning case portals closed using monocryl wound clean dry dressed steristrips xeroform x kneecap translated medially pressure bias placed tourniquet released minutes patient placed knee immobilizer patient tolerated procedure well subsequently extubated taken recovery stable conditionpostoperative plan patient weightbear tolerated knee immobilizer start physical therapy within weeks work patella mobilization well reconditioning strengthening intraoperative findings relayed mother questions answered

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Left patellar chondromalacia.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Left patellar chondromalacia with tight lateral structures.,PROCEDURE:, Left knee arthroscopy with lateral capsular release.,ANESTHESIA: , Surgery performed under general anesthesia.,TOURNIQUET TIME: ,47 minutes.,MEDICATION: ,The patient received 0.5% Marcaine local anesthetic 32 mL.,COMPLICATIONS: , No intraoperative complications.,DRAINS AND SPECIMENS: , None.,HISTORY AND PHYSICAL: ,The patient is a 14-year-old girl who started having left knee pain in the fall of 2007. She was not seen in Orthopedic Clinic until November 2007. The patient had an outside MRI performed that demonstrated left patellar chondromalacia only. The patient was referred to physical therapy for patellar tracking exercises. She was also given a brace. The patient reported increasing pain with physical therapy and mother strongly desired other treatment. It was explained to the mother in detail that this is a difficult problem to treat although majority of the patients get better with physical therapy. Her failure with nonoperative treatment is below the standard 6-month trial; however, given her symptoms and severe pain, lateral capsular release was offered. Risk and benefits of surgery were discussed. Risks of surgery including risk of anesthesia, infection, bleeding, changes in sensation and motion extremity, failure of procedure to relieve pain, need for postoperative rehab, and significant postoperative swelling. All questions were answered, and mother and daughter agreed to the above plans.,PROCEDURE NOTE: , The patient was taken to the operating room and placed on the operating table. General anesthesia was then administered. The patient received Ancef preoperatively. A nonsterile tourniquet was placed on the upper aspect of left thigh. The extremity was then prepped and draped in the standard surgical fashion. A medial suprapatellar portal was marked on the skin as well as anteromedial and anterolateral joint line. The extremity was wrapped in Esmarch prior to inflation of tourniquet to 250 mmHg. Esmarch was then removed. Incisions were then made. Camera was initially inserted into the lateral joint line. Visualization of patellofemoral joint revealed type 2 chondromalacia with slight lateral subluxation. The patient did have congruent articulation about 30 degrees of knee flexion. Visualization of the medial joint line revealed no loose bodies. There was a small plica. Visualization of the medial joint line revealed no significant chondromalacia. Menisci was probed and tested with no signs of tears and instability. ACL was noted to be intact. The intercondylar notch and lateral joint line also revealed no significant chondromalacia or meniscal pathology. Lateral gutter also demonstrated no loose bodies or plica. The camera was then removed and inserted into the anteromedial portal using two 18-gauge needles. The extent of lateral capsular release was marked using a monopolar coblator, lateral capsular release was performed. The patient had significant improvement in anteromedial translation from 25% to 50%. At the end of the case, all instruments were removed. The knee was injected with 32 mL of 0.5% Marcaine with additional epinephrine. Please note, the patient received 30 mL of 1:500,000 dilution epinephrine at the beginning of the case. The portals were then closed using 4-0 Monocryl. The wound was clean and dry, and dressed with Steri-Strips, Xeroform, and 4 x 4s. The kneecap was translated medially under pressure and a bias placed. The tourniquet was released at 47 minutes. The patient was then placed in the knee immobilizer. The patient tolerated the procedure well and was subsequently extubated and taken to the recovery in stable condition.,POSTOPERATIVE PLAN: , The patient will weightbear as tolerated in the knee immobilizer. She will start physical therapy within 1 to 2 weeks to work on patella mobilization as well as reconditioning and strengthening. Intraoperative findings were relayed to the mother. All questions were answered. ### Response: Orthopedic, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Left pleural effusion, parapneumonic, loculated.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Left pleural effusion, parapneumonic, loculated.,OPERATION: , Left chest tube placement.,IV SEDATION: , 5 mg of Versed total given under pulse ox monitoring, 1% lidocaine local infiltration.,PROCEDURE: , With the patient semi recumbent and supine the left anterolateral chest was prepped and draped in the usual sterile fashion. A 1% lidocaine was liberally infiltrated into the skin, subcutaneous tissue, deep fascia and the anterior axillary line just below the level of the nipple. The incision was made and deepened through the different layers to reach the intercostal space. The pleura was entered on top of the underlying rib and finger digital palpation was performed. Multiple loculations were encountered. Break up of loculations was performed posteriorly and a chest tube was directed posteriorly. Only a small amount of fluid was noted to come out initially. This was sent for various studies. Soft adhesions were encountered. The plan was to obtain a chest x-ray and start Activase installation.

preoperative diagnosis left pleural effusion parapneumonic loculatedpostoperative diagnosis left pleural effusion parapneumonic loculatedoperation left chest tube placementiv sedation mg versed total given pulse ox monitoring lidocaine local infiltrationprocedure patient semi recumbent supine left anterolateral chest prepped draped usual sterile fashion lidocaine liberally infiltrated skin subcutaneous tissue deep fascia anterior axillary line level nipple incision made deepened different layers reach intercostal space pleura entered top underlying rib finger digital palpation performed multiple loculations encountered break loculations performed posteriorly chest tube directed posteriorly small amount fluid noted come initially sent various studies soft adhesions encountered plan obtain chest xray start activase installation

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Left pleural effusion, parapneumonic, loculated.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Left pleural effusion, parapneumonic, loculated.,OPERATION: , Left chest tube placement.,IV SEDATION: , 5 mg of Versed total given under pulse ox monitoring, 1% lidocaine local infiltration.,PROCEDURE: , With the patient semi recumbent and supine the left anterolateral chest was prepped and draped in the usual sterile fashion. A 1% lidocaine was liberally infiltrated into the skin, subcutaneous tissue, deep fascia and the anterior axillary line just below the level of the nipple. The incision was made and deepened through the different layers to reach the intercostal space. The pleura was entered on top of the underlying rib and finger digital palpation was performed. Multiple loculations were encountered. Break up of loculations was performed posteriorly and a chest tube was directed posteriorly. Only a small amount of fluid was noted to come out initially. This was sent for various studies. Soft adhesions were encountered. The plan was to obtain a chest x-ray and start Activase installation. ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Left renal mass, left renal bleed.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: ,Left renal mass, left renal bleed.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED: , Left laparoscopic hand-assisted nephrectomy.,ANESTHESIA:, General endotracheal.,EBL: , 100 mL.,The patient had a triple-lumen catheter A-line placed.,BRIEF HISTORY:, The patient is a 54-year-old female with history of diabetic nephropathy, diabetes, hypertension, left BKA, who presented with abdominal pain with left renal bleed. The patient was found to have a complex mass in the upper pole and the lower pole of the kidney. MRI and CAT scan showed questionable renal mass, which could be malignant. Initial plan was to let the patient stabilize for 2 weeks and perform the nephrectomy. At this point, the patient was unable to go home. The patient continually complained of pain. The patient required about 3 to 4 units of blood transfusions prior. The patient initially came in with hemoglobin less than 5. The hemoglobin prior to surgery was 10.,Risks of anesthesia, bleeding, infection, pain, MI, DVT, PE, respiratory failure, morbidity and mortality of the procedure due to her low ejection fraction were discussed. Cardiac clearance was obtained. The patient was high risk, family and the patient knew about the risk. The recommendation from the pulmonologist, cardiologist, and medical team was to get the kidney out at this point because the patient and the family stated that they would not do well at home without any intervention. The patient and family understood all the risks and benefits in order to proceed with the surgery.,DETAILS OF THE PROCEDURE:, The patient was brought to the OR. Anesthesia was applied. The patient had A-line triple-lumen catheter. The patient was placed in left side up, right side down oblique position. All the pressure points were well padded. The right fistula was carefully padded completely around it. Axilla was protected. The fistula was checked throughout the procedure to ensure that it was stable. The arms, ankles, knees, and joints were all padded with foam. The patient was taped to the table using 2-inch wide tape. OG and a Foley catheter were in place. A supraumbilical incision was made about 6 cm in size and incision was carried through the subcutaneous tissue and through the fascia and peritoneum was entered sharply. There were some adhesions where the omentum was into the umbilical hernia, which was completely stuck. The omentum was released out of that just so we could obtain pneumoperitoneum. Pneumoperitoneum was obtained after using GelPort. Two 12-mm ports were placed in the left anterior axillary line, and mid clavicular line. The colon was reflected medially. Kidney was dissected laterally behind and inferiorly. There was large hematoma visualized with significant amount of old blood, which was irrigated out. Dissection was carried superiorly and the spleen was reflected medially. The spleen and colon were all intact at the end of the procedure. They were stable all throughout. Using endovascular GIA stapler, all the medial and lateral dissection was carried through the stapler to ensure that the patient had minimal bleeding due to low cardiac reserve. Hemostasis was obtained. The renal vein and the renal artery were stapled and there was excellent hemostasis.,The dissection was carried lateral to the adrenal and medial to the right kidney. The adrenal was preserved. The entire kidney was removed through the hand port. Irrigation was performed. There was excellent hemostasis at the end of the nephrectomy. Fibrin glue and Surgicel were applied just in case the patient had delayed DIC. The colon was placed back and 12-mm ports were closed under direct palpation using 0 Vicryl. The fascia was closed using loop #1 PDS in a running fashion and was tied in the middle. Please note that prior to the fascial closure, the peritoneum was closed using 0 Vicryl in running fashion. The subcuticular tissue was brought together using 4-0 Vicryl. The skin was closed using 4-0 Monocryl. Dermabond was applied. The patient was brought to the recovery in a stable condition.

preoperative diagnosis left renal mass left renal bleedpostoperative diagnosis left renal mass left renal bleedprocedure performed left laparoscopic handassisted nephrectomyanesthesia general endotrachealebl mlthe patient triplelumen catheter aline placedbrief history patient yearold female history diabetic nephropathy diabetes hypertension left bka presented abdominal pain left renal bleed patient found complex mass upper pole lower pole kidney mri cat scan showed questionable renal mass could malignant initial plan let patient stabilize weeks perform nephrectomy point patient unable go home patient continually complained pain patient required units blood transfusions prior patient initially came hemoglobin less hemoglobin prior surgery risks anesthesia bleeding infection pain mi dvt pe respiratory failure morbidity mortality procedure due low ejection fraction discussed cardiac clearance obtained patient high risk family patient knew risk recommendation pulmonologist cardiologist medical team get kidney point patient family stated would well home without intervention patient family understood risks benefits order proceed surgerydetails procedure patient brought anesthesia applied patient aline triplelumen catheter patient placed left side right side oblique position pressure points well padded right fistula carefully padded completely around axilla protected fistula checked throughout procedure ensure stable arms ankles knees joints padded foam patient taped table using inch wide tape og foley catheter place supraumbilical incision made cm size incision carried subcutaneous tissue fascia peritoneum entered sharply adhesions omentum umbilical hernia completely stuck omentum released could obtain pneumoperitoneum pneumoperitoneum obtained using gelport two mm ports placed left anterior axillary line mid clavicular line colon reflected medially kidney dissected laterally behind inferiorly large hematoma visualized significant amount old blood irrigated dissection carried superiorly spleen reflected medially spleen colon intact end procedure stable throughout using endovascular gia stapler medial lateral dissection carried stapler ensure patient minimal bleeding due low cardiac reserve hemostasis obtained renal vein renal artery stapled excellent hemostasisthe dissection carried lateral adrenal medial right kidney adrenal preserved entire kidney removed hand port irrigation performed excellent hemostasis end nephrectomy fibrin glue surgicel applied case patient delayed dic colon placed back mm ports closed direct palpation using vicryl fascia closed using loop pds running fashion tied middle please note prior fascial closure peritoneum closed using vicryl running fashion subcuticular tissue brought together using vicryl skin closed using monocryl dermabond applied patient brought recovery stable condition

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Left renal mass, left renal bleed.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: ,Left renal mass, left renal bleed.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED: , Left laparoscopic hand-assisted nephrectomy.,ANESTHESIA:, General endotracheal.,EBL: , 100 mL.,The patient had a triple-lumen catheter A-line placed.,BRIEF HISTORY:, The patient is a 54-year-old female with history of diabetic nephropathy, diabetes, hypertension, left BKA, who presented with abdominal pain with left renal bleed. The patient was found to have a complex mass in the upper pole and the lower pole of the kidney. MRI and CAT scan showed questionable renal mass, which could be malignant. Initial plan was to let the patient stabilize for 2 weeks and perform the nephrectomy. At this point, the patient was unable to go home. The patient continually complained of pain. The patient required about 3 to 4 units of blood transfusions prior. The patient initially came in with hemoglobin less than 5. The hemoglobin prior to surgery was 10.,Risks of anesthesia, bleeding, infection, pain, MI, DVT, PE, respiratory failure, morbidity and mortality of the procedure due to her low ejection fraction were discussed. Cardiac clearance was obtained. The patient was high risk, family and the patient knew about the risk. The recommendation from the pulmonologist, cardiologist, and medical team was to get the kidney out at this point because the patient and the family stated that they would not do well at home without any intervention. The patient and family understood all the risks and benefits in order to proceed with the surgery.,DETAILS OF THE PROCEDURE:, The patient was brought to the OR. Anesthesia was applied. The patient had A-line triple-lumen catheter. The patient was placed in left side up, right side down oblique position. All the pressure points were well padded. The right fistula was carefully padded completely around it. Axilla was protected. The fistula was checked throughout the procedure to ensure that it was stable. The arms, ankles, knees, and joints were all padded with foam. The patient was taped to the table using 2-inch wide tape. OG and a Foley catheter were in place. A supraumbilical incision was made about 6 cm in size and incision was carried through the subcutaneous tissue and through the fascia and peritoneum was entered sharply. There were some adhesions where the omentum was into the umbilical hernia, which was completely stuck. The omentum was released out of that just so we could obtain pneumoperitoneum. Pneumoperitoneum was obtained after using GelPort. Two 12-mm ports were placed in the left anterior axillary line, and mid clavicular line. The colon was reflected medially. Kidney was dissected laterally behind and inferiorly. There was large hematoma visualized with significant amount of old blood, which was irrigated out. Dissection was carried superiorly and the spleen was reflected medially. The spleen and colon were all intact at the end of the procedure. They were stable all throughout. Using endovascular GIA stapler, all the medial and lateral dissection was carried through the stapler to ensure that the patient had minimal bleeding due to low cardiac reserve. Hemostasis was obtained. The renal vein and the renal artery were stapled and there was excellent hemostasis.,The dissection was carried lateral to the adrenal and medial to the right kidney. The adrenal was preserved. The entire kidney was removed through the hand port. Irrigation was performed. There was excellent hemostasis at the end of the nephrectomy. Fibrin glue and Surgicel were applied just in case the patient had delayed DIC. The colon was placed back and 12-mm ports were closed under direct palpation using 0 Vicryl. The fascia was closed using loop #1 PDS in a running fashion and was tied in the middle. Please note that prior to the fascial closure, the peritoneum was closed using 0 Vicryl in running fashion. The subcuticular tissue was brought together using 4-0 Vicryl. The skin was closed using 4-0 Monocryl. Dermabond was applied. The patient was brought to the recovery in a stable condition. ### Response: Nephrology, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Left testicular torsion, possibly detorsion.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Left testicular torsion, possibly detorsion.,PROCEDURE: , Left scrotal exploration with detorsion. Already, de-torsed bilateral testes fixation and bilateral appendix testes cautery.,ANESTHETIC:, A 0.25% Marcaine local wound insufflation per surgeon, 15 mL of Toradol.,FINDINGS:, Congestion in the left testis and cord with a bell-clapper deformity on the right small appendix testes bilaterally. No testis necrosis.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS:, 5 mL.,FLUIDS RECEIVED: , 300 mL of crystalloid.,TUBES AND DRAINS:, None.,SPECIMENS: , No tissues sent to pathology.,COUNTS:, Sponges and needle counts were correct x2.,INDICATIONS OF OPERATION: , The patient is a 4-year-old boy with abrupt onset of left testicular pain. He has had a history of similar onset. Apparently, he had no full on one ultrasound and full on a second ultrasound, but because of possible torsion, detorsion, or incomplete detorsion, I recommended an exploration.,DESCRIPTION OF OPERATION:, The patient was taken to the operating room, where surgical consent, operative site, and patient identification was verified. Once he was anesthetized, he was placed in supine position and sterilely prepped and draped. Superior scrotal incisions were then made with 15-blade knife and further extended up to the subcutaneous tissue and dartos fascia with electrocautery. Electrocautery was used for hemostasis. The subdartos pouch was created with curved tenotomy scissors. The tunica vaginalis was then delivered, incised, and testis was delivered. The testis itself with a bell-clapper deformity. There was no actual torsion at the present time, there was some modest congestion and, however, the vasculature was markedly congested down the cord. The penis fascia was cauterized and subdartos pouch was created. The upper aspect of fascia was then closed with pursestring suture of 4-0 chromic. The testis was then placed into the scrotum in a proper orientation. No tacking sutures within the testis itself were used. The tunica vaginalis; however, was wrapped perfectly behind the back of the testis. A similar procedure was performed on the right side. Again, an appendix testis was cauterized. No torsion was seen. He also had a bell-clapper deformity and similar dartos pouch was created and the testis was placed in the scrotum in the proper orientation and the upper aspect closed with #4-0 chromic suture. The local anesthetic was then used for both as cord block, as well as a local wound insufflation bilaterally with 0.25% Marcaine. The scrotal wall was then closed with subcuticular closure of #4-0 chromic. Dermabond tissue adhesive was then used. The patient tolerated the procedure well. He was given IV Toradol and was taken to the recovery room in stable condition.

preoperative diagnosis left testicular torsion possibly detorsionpostoperative diagnosis left testicular torsion possibly detorsionprocedure left scrotal exploration detorsion already detorsed bilateral testes fixation bilateral appendix testes cauteryanesthetic marcaine local wound insufflation per surgeon ml toradolfindings congestion left testis cord bellclapper deformity right small appendix testes bilaterally testis necrosisestimated blood loss mlfluids received ml crystalloidtubes drains nonespecimens tissues sent pathologycounts sponges needle counts correct xindications operation patient yearold boy abrupt onset left testicular pain history similar onset apparently full one ultrasound full second ultrasound possible torsion detorsion incomplete detorsion recommended explorationdescription operation patient taken operating room surgical consent operative site patient identification verified anesthetized placed supine position sterilely prepped draped superior scrotal incisions made blade knife extended subcutaneous tissue dartos fascia electrocautery electrocautery used hemostasis subdartos pouch created curved tenotomy scissors tunica vaginalis delivered incised testis delivered testis bellclapper deformity actual torsion present time modest congestion however vasculature markedly congested cord penis fascia cauterized subdartos pouch created upper aspect fascia closed pursestring suture chromic testis placed scrotum proper orientation tacking sutures within testis used tunica vaginalis however wrapped perfectly behind back testis similar procedure performed right side appendix testis cauterized torsion seen also bellclapper deformity similar dartos pouch created testis placed scrotum proper orientation upper aspect closed chromic suture local anesthetic used cord block well local wound insufflation bilaterally marcaine scrotal wall closed subcuticular closure chromic dermabond tissue adhesive used patient tolerated procedure well given iv toradol taken recovery room stable condition

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Left testicular torsion, possibly detorsion.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Left testicular torsion, possibly detorsion.,PROCEDURE: , Left scrotal exploration with detorsion. Already, de-torsed bilateral testes fixation and bilateral appendix testes cautery.,ANESTHETIC:, A 0.25% Marcaine local wound insufflation per surgeon, 15 mL of Toradol.,FINDINGS:, Congestion in the left testis and cord with a bell-clapper deformity on the right small appendix testes bilaterally. No testis necrosis.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS:, 5 mL.,FLUIDS RECEIVED: , 300 mL of crystalloid.,TUBES AND DRAINS:, None.,SPECIMENS: , No tissues sent to pathology.,COUNTS:, Sponges and needle counts were correct x2.,INDICATIONS OF OPERATION: , The patient is a 4-year-old boy with abrupt onset of left testicular pain. He has had a history of similar onset. Apparently, he had no full on one ultrasound and full on a second ultrasound, but because of possible torsion, detorsion, or incomplete detorsion, I recommended an exploration.,DESCRIPTION OF OPERATION:, The patient was taken to the operating room, where surgical consent, operative site, and patient identification was verified. Once he was anesthetized, he was placed in supine position and sterilely prepped and draped. Superior scrotal incisions were then made with 15-blade knife and further extended up to the subcutaneous tissue and dartos fascia with electrocautery. Electrocautery was used for hemostasis. The subdartos pouch was created with curved tenotomy scissors. The tunica vaginalis was then delivered, incised, and testis was delivered. The testis itself with a bell-clapper deformity. There was no actual torsion at the present time, there was some modest congestion and, however, the vasculature was markedly congested down the cord. The penis fascia was cauterized and subdartos pouch was created. The upper aspect of fascia was then closed with pursestring suture of 4-0 chromic. The testis was then placed into the scrotum in a proper orientation. No tacking sutures within the testis itself were used. The tunica vaginalis; however, was wrapped perfectly behind the back of the testis. A similar procedure was performed on the right side. Again, an appendix testis was cauterized. No torsion was seen. He also had a bell-clapper deformity and similar dartos pouch was created and the testis was placed in the scrotum in the proper orientation and the upper aspect closed with #4-0 chromic suture. The local anesthetic was then used for both as cord block, as well as a local wound insufflation bilaterally with 0.25% Marcaine. The scrotal wall was then closed with subcuticular closure of #4-0 chromic. Dermabond tissue adhesive was then used. The patient tolerated the procedure well. He was given IV Toradol and was taken to the recovery room in stable condition. ### Response: Surgery, Urology

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Left testicular torsion.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSES: ,1. Left testicular torsion.,2. Left testicular abscess.,3. Necrotic testes.,SURGERY:, Left orchiectomy, scrotal exploration, right orchidopexy.,DRAINS:, Penrose drain on the left hemiscrotum.,The patient was given vancomycin, Zosyn, and Levaquin preop.,BRIEF HISTORY: ,The patient is a 49-year-old male who came into the emergency room with 2-week history of left testicular pain, scrotal swelling, elevated white count of 39,000. The patient had significant scrotal swelling and pain. Ultrasound revealed necrotic testicle. Options such as watchful waiting and removal of the testicle were discussed. Due to elevated white count, the patient was told that he must have the testicle removed due to the infection and possible early signs of urosepsis. The risks of anesthesia, bleeding, infection, pain, MI, DVT, PE, scrotal issues, other complications were discussed. The patient was told about the morbidity and mortality of the procedure and wanted to proceed.,PROCEDURE IN DETAIL: , The patient was brought to the OR. Anesthesia was applied. The patient was prepped and draped in usual sterile fashion. A midline scrotal incision was made. There was very, very thick scrotal skin. There was no necrotic skin. As soon as the left hemiscrotum was entered, significant amount of pus poured out of the left hemiscrotum. The testicle was completely filled with pus and had completely disintegrated with pus. The pus just poured out of the left testicle. The left testicle was completely removed. Debridement was done of the scrotal wall to remove any necrotic tissue. Over 2 L of antibiotic irrigation solution was used to irrigate the left hemiscrotum. There was good tissue left after all the irrigation and debridement. A Penrose drain was placed in the bottom of the left hemiscrotum. I worried about the patient may have torsed and then the testicle became necrotic, so the plan was to pex the right testicle, plus the right side also appeared very abnormal. So, the right hemiscrotum was opened. The testicle had significant amount of swelling and scrotal wall was very thick. The testicle appeared normal. There was no pus coming out of the right hemiscrotum. At this time, a decision was made to place 4-0 Prolene nonabsorbable stitches in 3 different quadrants to prevent it from torsion. The hemiscrotum was closed using 2-0 Vicryl in interrupted stitches and the skin was closed using 2-0 PDS in horizontal mattress. There was very minimal pus left behind and the skin was very healthy. Decision was made to close it to help the patient heal better in the long run. The patient was brought to the recovery in stable condition.

preoperative diagnosis left testicular torsionpostoperative diagnoses left testicular torsion left testicular abscess necrotic testessurgery left orchiectomy scrotal exploration right orchidopexydrains penrose drain left hemiscrotumthe patient given vancomycin zosyn levaquin preopbrief history patient yearold male came emergency room week history left testicular pain scrotal swelling elevated white count patient significant scrotal swelling pain ultrasound revealed necrotic testicle options watchful waiting removal testicle discussed due elevated white count patient told must testicle removed due infection possible early signs urosepsis risks anesthesia bleeding infection pain mi dvt pe scrotal issues complications discussed patient told morbidity mortality procedure wanted proceedprocedure detail patient brought anesthesia applied patient prepped draped usual sterile fashion midline scrotal incision made thick scrotal skin necrotic skin soon left hemiscrotum entered significant amount pus poured left hemiscrotum testicle completely filled pus completely disintegrated pus pus poured left testicle left testicle completely removed debridement done scrotal wall remove necrotic tissue l antibiotic irrigation solution used irrigate left hemiscrotum good tissue left irrigation debridement penrose drain placed bottom left hemiscrotum worried patient may torsed testicle became necrotic plan pex right testicle plus right side also appeared abnormal right hemiscrotum opened testicle significant amount swelling scrotal wall thick testicle appeared normal pus coming right hemiscrotum time decision made place prolene nonabsorbable stitches different quadrants prevent torsion hemiscrotum closed using vicryl interrupted stitches skin closed using pds horizontal mattress minimal pus left behind skin healthy decision made close help patient heal better long run patient brought recovery stable condition

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Left testicular torsion.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSES: ,1. Left testicular torsion.,2. Left testicular abscess.,3. Necrotic testes.,SURGERY:, Left orchiectomy, scrotal exploration, right orchidopexy.,DRAINS:, Penrose drain on the left hemiscrotum.,The patient was given vancomycin, Zosyn, and Levaquin preop.,BRIEF HISTORY: ,The patient is a 49-year-old male who came into the emergency room with 2-week history of left testicular pain, scrotal swelling, elevated white count of 39,000. The patient had significant scrotal swelling and pain. Ultrasound revealed necrotic testicle. Options such as watchful waiting and removal of the testicle were discussed. Due to elevated white count, the patient was told that he must have the testicle removed due to the infection and possible early signs of urosepsis. The risks of anesthesia, bleeding, infection, pain, MI, DVT, PE, scrotal issues, other complications were discussed. The patient was told about the morbidity and mortality of the procedure and wanted to proceed.,PROCEDURE IN DETAIL: , The patient was brought to the OR. Anesthesia was applied. The patient was prepped and draped in usual sterile fashion. A midline scrotal incision was made. There was very, very thick scrotal skin. There was no necrotic skin. As soon as the left hemiscrotum was entered, significant amount of pus poured out of the left hemiscrotum. The testicle was completely filled with pus and had completely disintegrated with pus. The pus just poured out of the left testicle. The left testicle was completely removed. Debridement was done of the scrotal wall to remove any necrotic tissue. Over 2 L of antibiotic irrigation solution was used to irrigate the left hemiscrotum. There was good tissue left after all the irrigation and debridement. A Penrose drain was placed in the bottom of the left hemiscrotum. I worried about the patient may have torsed and then the testicle became necrotic, so the plan was to pex the right testicle, plus the right side also appeared very abnormal. So, the right hemiscrotum was opened. The testicle had significant amount of swelling and scrotal wall was very thick. The testicle appeared normal. There was no pus coming out of the right hemiscrotum. At this time, a decision was made to place 4-0 Prolene nonabsorbable stitches in 3 different quadrants to prevent it from torsion. The hemiscrotum was closed using 2-0 Vicryl in interrupted stitches and the skin was closed using 2-0 PDS in horizontal mattress. There was very minimal pus left behind and the skin was very healthy. Decision was made to close it to help the patient heal better in the long run. The patient was brought to the recovery in stable condition. ### Response: Surgery, Urology

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Left tibial tubercle avulsion fracture.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Comminuted left tibial tubercle avulsion fracture with intraarticular extension.,PROCEDURE:, Open reduction and internal fixation of left tibia.,ANESTHESIA: , General. The patient received 10 ml of 0.5% Marcaine local anesthetic.,TOURNIQUET TIME: , 80 minutes.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS:, Minimal.,DRAINS: , One JP drain was placed.,COMPLICATIONS: , No intraoperative complications or specimens. Hardware consisted of two 4-5 K-wires, One 6.5, 60 mm partially threaded cancellous screw and one 45, 60 mm partially threaded cortical screw and 2 washers.,HISTORY AND PHYSICAL:, The patient is a 14-year-old male who reported having knee pain for 1 month. Apparently while he was playing basketball on 12/22/2007 when he had gone up for a jump, he felt a pop in his knee. The patient was seen at an outside facility where he was splinted and subsequently referred to Children's for definitive care. Radiographs confirmed comminuted tibial tubercle avulsion fracture with patella alta. Surgery is recommended to the grandmother and subsequently to the father by phone. Surgery would consist of open reduction and internal fixation with subsequent need for later hardware removal. Risks of surgery include the risks of anesthesia, infection, bleeding, changes on sensation in most of the extremity, hardware failure, need for later hardware removal, failure to restore extensor mechanism tension, and need for postoperative rehab. All questions were answered, and father and grandmother agreed to the above plan.,PROCEDURE: , The patient was taken to the operating and placed supine on the operating table. General anesthesia was then administered. The patient was given Ancef preoperatively. A nonsterile tourniquet was placed on the upper aspect of the patient's left thigh. The patient's extremity was then prepped and draped in the standard surgical fashion. Midline incision was marked on the skin extending from the tibial tubercle proximally and extremities wrapped in Esmarch. Finally, the patient had tourniquet that turned in 75 mmHg. Esmarch was then removed. The incision was then made. The patient had significant tearing of the posterior retinaculum medially with proximal migration of the tibial tubercle which was located in the joint there was a significant comminution and intraarticular involvement. We were able to see the underside of the anterior horn of both medial and lateral meniscus. The intraarticular cartilage was restored using two 45 K-wires. Final position was checked via fluoroscopy and the corners were buried in the cartilage. There was a large free floating metaphyseal piece that included parts of proximal tibial physis. This was placed back in an anatomic location and fixed using a 45 cortical screw with a washer. The avulsed fragment with the patellar tendon was then fixed distally to this area using a 6.5, 60 mm cancellous screw with a washer. The cortical screw did not provide good compression and fixation at this distal fragment. Retinaculum was repaired using 0 Vicryl suture as best as possible. The hematoma was evacuated at the beginning of the case as well as the end. The knee was copiously irrigated with normal saline. The subcutaneous tissue was re-approximated using 2-0 Vicryl and the skin with 4-0 Monocryl. The wound was cleaned, dried, and dressed with Steri-Strips, Xeroform, and 4 x4s. Tourniquet was released at 80 minutes. JP drain was placed on the medium gutter. The extremity was then wrapped in Ace wrap from the proximal thigh down to the toes. The patient was then placed in a knee mobilizer. The patient tolerated the procedure well. Subsequently extubated and taken to the recovery in stable condition.,POSTOP PLAN: ,The patient hospitalized overnight to decrease swelling and as well as manage his pain. He may weightbear as tolerated using knee mobilizer. Postoperative findings relayed to the grandmother. The patient will need subsequent hardware removal. The patient also was given local anesthetic at the end of the case.

preoperative diagnosis left tibial tubercle avulsion fracturepostoperative diagnosis comminuted left tibial tubercle avulsion fracture intraarticular extensionprocedure open reduction internal fixation left tibiaanesthesia general patient received ml marcaine local anesthetictourniquet time minutesestimated blood loss minimaldrains one jp drain placedcomplications intraoperative complications specimens hardware consisted two kwires one mm partially threaded cancellous screw one mm partially threaded cortical screw washershistory physical patient yearold male reported knee pain month apparently playing basketball gone jump felt pop knee patient seen outside facility splinted subsequently referred childrens definitive care radiographs confirmed comminuted tibial tubercle avulsion fracture patella alta surgery recommended grandmother subsequently father phone surgery would consist open reduction internal fixation subsequent need later hardware removal risks surgery include risks anesthesia infection bleeding changes sensation extremity hardware failure need later hardware removal failure restore extensor mechanism tension need postoperative rehab questions answered father grandmother agreed planprocedure patient taken operating placed supine operating table general anesthesia administered patient given ancef preoperatively nonsterile tourniquet placed upper aspect patients left thigh patients extremity prepped draped standard surgical fashion midline incision marked skin extending tibial tubercle proximally extremities wrapped esmarch finally patient tourniquet turned mmhg esmarch removed incision made patient significant tearing posterior retinaculum medially proximal migration tibial tubercle located joint significant comminution intraarticular involvement able see underside anterior horn medial lateral meniscus intraarticular cartilage restored using two kwires final position checked via fluoroscopy corners buried cartilage large free floating metaphyseal piece included parts proximal tibial physis placed back anatomic location fixed using cortical screw washer avulsed fragment patellar tendon fixed distally area using mm cancellous screw washer cortical screw provide good compression fixation distal fragment retinaculum repaired using vicryl suture best possible hematoma evacuated beginning case well end knee copiously irrigated normal saline subcutaneous tissue reapproximated using vicryl skin monocryl wound cleaned dried dressed steristrips xeroform xs tourniquet released minutes jp drain placed medium gutter extremity wrapped ace wrap proximal thigh toes patient placed knee mobilizer patient tolerated procedure well subsequently extubated taken recovery stable conditionpostop plan patient hospitalized overnight decrease swelling well manage pain may weightbear tolerated using knee mobilizer postoperative findings relayed grandmother patient need subsequent hardware removal patient also given local anesthetic end case

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Left tibial tubercle avulsion fracture.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Comminuted left tibial tubercle avulsion fracture with intraarticular extension.,PROCEDURE:, Open reduction and internal fixation of left tibia.,ANESTHESIA: , General. The patient received 10 ml of 0.5% Marcaine local anesthetic.,TOURNIQUET TIME: , 80 minutes.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS:, Minimal.,DRAINS: , One JP drain was placed.,COMPLICATIONS: , No intraoperative complications or specimens. Hardware consisted of two 4-5 K-wires, One 6.5, 60 mm partially threaded cancellous screw and one 45, 60 mm partially threaded cortical screw and 2 washers.,HISTORY AND PHYSICAL:, The patient is a 14-year-old male who reported having knee pain for 1 month. Apparently while he was playing basketball on 12/22/2007 when he had gone up for a jump, he felt a pop in his knee. The patient was seen at an outside facility where he was splinted and subsequently referred to Children's for definitive care. Radiographs confirmed comminuted tibial tubercle avulsion fracture with patella alta. Surgery is recommended to the grandmother and subsequently to the father by phone. Surgery would consist of open reduction and internal fixation with subsequent need for later hardware removal. Risks of surgery include the risks of anesthesia, infection, bleeding, changes on sensation in most of the extremity, hardware failure, need for later hardware removal, failure to restore extensor mechanism tension, and need for postoperative rehab. All questions were answered, and father and grandmother agreed to the above plan.,PROCEDURE: , The patient was taken to the operating and placed supine on the operating table. General anesthesia was then administered. The patient was given Ancef preoperatively. A nonsterile tourniquet was placed on the upper aspect of the patient's left thigh. The patient's extremity was then prepped and draped in the standard surgical fashion. Midline incision was marked on the skin extending from the tibial tubercle proximally and extremities wrapped in Esmarch. Finally, the patient had tourniquet that turned in 75 mmHg. Esmarch was then removed. The incision was then made. The patient had significant tearing of the posterior retinaculum medially with proximal migration of the tibial tubercle which was located in the joint there was a significant comminution and intraarticular involvement. We were able to see the underside of the anterior horn of both medial and lateral meniscus. The intraarticular cartilage was restored using two 45 K-wires. Final position was checked via fluoroscopy and the corners were buried in the cartilage. There was a large free floating metaphyseal piece that included parts of proximal tibial physis. This was placed back in an anatomic location and fixed using a 45 cortical screw with a washer. The avulsed fragment with the patellar tendon was then fixed distally to this area using a 6.5, 60 mm cancellous screw with a washer. The cortical screw did not provide good compression and fixation at this distal fragment. Retinaculum was repaired using 0 Vicryl suture as best as possible. The hematoma was evacuated at the beginning of the case as well as the end. The knee was copiously irrigated with normal saline. The subcutaneous tissue was re-approximated using 2-0 Vicryl and the skin with 4-0 Monocryl. The wound was cleaned, dried, and dressed with Steri-Strips, Xeroform, and 4 x4s. Tourniquet was released at 80 minutes. JP drain was placed on the medium gutter. The extremity was then wrapped in Ace wrap from the proximal thigh down to the toes. The patient was then placed in a knee mobilizer. The patient tolerated the procedure well. Subsequently extubated and taken to the recovery in stable condition.,POSTOP PLAN: ,The patient hospitalized overnight to decrease swelling and as well as manage his pain. He may weightbear as tolerated using knee mobilizer. Postoperative findings relayed to the grandmother. The patient will need subsequent hardware removal. The patient also was given local anesthetic at the end of the case. ### Response: Orthopedic, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Left undescended testis.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Left undescended testis plus left inguinal hernia.,PROCEDURES:, Left inguinal hernia repair, left orchiopexy with 0.25% Marcaine, ilioinguinal nerve block and wound block at 0.5% Marcaine plain.,ABNORMAL FINDINGS:, A high left undescended testis with a type III epididymal attachment along with vas.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS:, Less than 5 mL.,FLUIDS RECEIVED: ,1100 mL of crystalloid.,TUBES/DRAINS: , No tubes or drains were used.,COUNTS:, Sponge and needle counts were correct x2.,SPECIMENS,: No tissues sent to Pathology.,ANESTHESIA:, General inhalational anesthetic.,INDICATIONS FOR OPERATION: , The patient is an 11-1/2-year-old boy with an undescended testis on the left. The plan is for repair.,DESCRIPTION OF OPERATION:, The patient was taken to the operating room, where surgical consent, operative site, and patient identification were verified. Once he was anesthetized, he was then placed in a supine position, and sterilely prepped and draped. A superior curvilinear scrotal incision was then made in the left hemiscrotum with a 15-blade knife and further extended with electrocautery into the subcutaneous tissue. We then used the curved cryoclamp to dissect into the scrotal space and found the tunica vaginalis and dissected this up to the external ring. We were able to dissect all the way up to the ring, but were unable to get the testis delivered. We then made a left inguinal incision with a 15-blade knife, further extending with electrocautery through Scarpa fascia down to the external oblique fascia. The testis again was not visualized in the external ring, so we brought the sac up from the scrotum into the inguinal incision and then incised the external oblique fascia with a 15-blade knife further extending with Metzenbaum scissors. The testis itself was quite high up in the upper canal. We then dissected the gubernacular structures off of the testis, and also, then opened the sac, and dissected the sac off and found that he had a communicating hernia hydrocele and dissected the sac off with curved and straight mosquitos and a straight Joseph scissors. Once this was dissected off and up towards the internal ring, it was twisted upon itself and suture ligated with an 0 Vicryl suture. We then dissected the lateral spermatic fascia, and then, using blunt dissection, dissected in the retroperitoneal space to get more cord length. We also dissected the sac from the peritoneal reflection up into the abdomen once it had been tied off. We then found that we had an adequate amount of cord length to get the testis in the mid-to-low scrotum. The patient was found to have a type III epididymal attachment with a long looping vas, and we brought the testis into the scrotum in the proper orientation and tacked it to mid-to-low scrotum with a 4-0 chromic stay stitch. The upper aspect of the subdartos pouch was closed with a 4-0 chromic pursestring suture. The testis was then placed into the scrotum in the proper orientation. We then placed the local anesthetic, and the ilioinguinal nerve block, and placed a small amount in both incisional areas as well. We then closed the external oblique fascia with a running suture of 0-Vicryl ensuring that the ilioinguinal nerve and cord structures were not bottom closure. The Scarpa fascia was closed with a 4-0 chromic suture, and the skin was closed with a 4-0 Rapide subcuticular closure. Dermabond tissue adhesive was placed on the both incisions, and IV Toradol was given at the end of the procedure. The patient tolerated the procedure well, was in a stable condition upon transfer to the recovery room.

preoperative diagnosis left undescended testispostoperative diagnosis left undescended testis plus left inguinal herniaprocedures left inguinal hernia repair left orchiopexy marcaine ilioinguinal nerve block wound block marcaine plainabnormal findings high left undescended testis type iii epididymal attachment along vasestimated blood loss less mlfluids received ml crystalloidtubesdrains tubes drains usedcounts sponge needle counts correct xspecimens tissues sent pathologyanesthesia general inhalational anestheticindications operation patient yearold boy undescended testis left plan repairdescription operation patient taken operating room surgical consent operative site patient identification verified anesthetized placed supine position sterilely prepped draped superior curvilinear scrotal incision made left hemiscrotum blade knife extended electrocautery subcutaneous tissue used curved cryoclamp dissect scrotal space found tunica vaginalis dissected external ring able dissect way ring unable get testis delivered made left inguinal incision blade knife extending electrocautery scarpa fascia external oblique fascia testis visualized external ring brought sac scrotum inguinal incision incised external oblique fascia blade knife extending metzenbaum scissors testis quite high upper canal dissected gubernacular structures testis also opened sac dissected sac found communicating hernia hydrocele dissected sac curved straight mosquitos straight joseph scissors dissected towards internal ring twisted upon suture ligated vicryl suture dissected lateral spermatic fascia using blunt dissection dissected retroperitoneal space get cord length also dissected sac peritoneal reflection abdomen tied found adequate amount cord length get testis midtolow scrotum patient found type iii epididymal attachment long looping vas brought testis scrotum proper orientation tacked midtolow scrotum chromic stay stitch upper aspect subdartos pouch closed chromic pursestring suture testis placed scrotum proper orientation placed local anesthetic ilioinguinal nerve block placed small amount incisional areas well closed external oblique fascia running suture vicryl ensuring ilioinguinal nerve cord structures bottom closure scarpa fascia closed chromic suture skin closed rapide subcuticular closure dermabond tissue adhesive placed incisions iv toradol given end procedure patient tolerated procedure well stable condition upon transfer recovery room

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Left undescended testis.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Left undescended testis plus left inguinal hernia.,PROCEDURES:, Left inguinal hernia repair, left orchiopexy with 0.25% Marcaine, ilioinguinal nerve block and wound block at 0.5% Marcaine plain.,ABNORMAL FINDINGS:, A high left undescended testis with a type III epididymal attachment along with vas.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS:, Less than 5 mL.,FLUIDS RECEIVED: ,1100 mL of crystalloid.,TUBES/DRAINS: , No tubes or drains were used.,COUNTS:, Sponge and needle counts were correct x2.,SPECIMENS,: No tissues sent to Pathology.,ANESTHESIA:, General inhalational anesthetic.,INDICATIONS FOR OPERATION: , The patient is an 11-1/2-year-old boy with an undescended testis on the left. The plan is for repair.,DESCRIPTION OF OPERATION:, The patient was taken to the operating room, where surgical consent, operative site, and patient identification were verified. Once he was anesthetized, he was then placed in a supine position, and sterilely prepped and draped. A superior curvilinear scrotal incision was then made in the left hemiscrotum with a 15-blade knife and further extended with electrocautery into the subcutaneous tissue. We then used the curved cryoclamp to dissect into the scrotal space and found the tunica vaginalis and dissected this up to the external ring. We were able to dissect all the way up to the ring, but were unable to get the testis delivered. We then made a left inguinal incision with a 15-blade knife, further extending with electrocautery through Scarpa fascia down to the external oblique fascia. The testis again was not visualized in the external ring, so we brought the sac up from the scrotum into the inguinal incision and then incised the external oblique fascia with a 15-blade knife further extending with Metzenbaum scissors. The testis itself was quite high up in the upper canal. We then dissected the gubernacular structures off of the testis, and also, then opened the sac, and dissected the sac off and found that he had a communicating hernia hydrocele and dissected the sac off with curved and straight mosquitos and a straight Joseph scissors. Once this was dissected off and up towards the internal ring, it was twisted upon itself and suture ligated with an 0 Vicryl suture. We then dissected the lateral spermatic fascia, and then, using blunt dissection, dissected in the retroperitoneal space to get more cord length. We also dissected the sac from the peritoneal reflection up into the abdomen once it had been tied off. We then found that we had an adequate amount of cord length to get the testis in the mid-to-low scrotum. The patient was found to have a type III epididymal attachment with a long looping vas, and we brought the testis into the scrotum in the proper orientation and tacked it to mid-to-low scrotum with a 4-0 chromic stay stitch. The upper aspect of the subdartos pouch was closed with a 4-0 chromic pursestring suture. The testis was then placed into the scrotum in the proper orientation. We then placed the local anesthetic, and the ilioinguinal nerve block, and placed a small amount in both incisional areas as well. We then closed the external oblique fascia with a running suture of 0-Vicryl ensuring that the ilioinguinal nerve and cord structures were not bottom closure. The Scarpa fascia was closed with a 4-0 chromic suture, and the skin was closed with a 4-0 Rapide subcuticular closure. Dermabond tissue adhesive was placed on the both incisions, and IV Toradol was given at the end of the procedure. The patient tolerated the procedure well, was in a stable condition upon transfer to the recovery room. ### Response: Surgery, Urology

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Left upper extremity amputation.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Left upper extremity amputation.,PROCEDURES:,1. Left abdominal flap 5 x 5 cm to left forearm.,2. Debridement of skin, subcutaneous tissue, muscle, and bone.,3. Closure of wounds, simple closure approximately 8 cm.,4. Placement of VAC negative pressure wound dressing.,INDICATIONS: , This 3-year-old male suffered amputation of his left upper extremity with complications of injury. He presents at this time for further attempts at closure.,OPERATIVE FINDINGS: , A clean wound to left upper extremity with partial dehiscence of previously closed wounds and also the closure was satisfactory.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: , Under inhalational anesthesia, he was prepped and draped in usual fashion exposing left upper extremity and also exposing continuity of the left abdomen, chest, and groin. He underwent systematic evaluation of his wound of his left upper extremity and we excised first the whole wound prior to doing some additional closure. Some areas were dehisced and appeared to be because it was approximation of granulation tissue and as a result the edges were freshened up prior to approximating them. In this fashion, simple closure was accomplished and its total length was approximately 8 cm. It should be noted that prior to doing any procedure that appropriate timeout was performed and he received prophylactic antibiotics as indicated and did not require DVT prophylaxis. At this time, once we accomplished debridement and simple closure removing skin, subcutaneous tissue, muscle and bone as well as closing the arm, we could design our flap for the abdomen. The flap was designed as a slightly greater than 1:1 ellipse of skin from just below the costal margin. This was elevated at the level of the external oblique and then laid on the left forearm. The donor's site was closed using interrupted 4-0 Vicryl in the deep dermis and running subcuticular 4-0 Monocryl on the skin. Steri-Strips were applied. At this time, the flap was inset using again 4-0 Monocryl sutures and then ultimately the VAC negative pressure wound dressing was applied to help hold this in place and optimize the vascularization of the flap. The patient tolerated the procedure well and he returned to the recovery room in satisfactory condition.

preoperative diagnosis left upper extremity amputationpostoperative diagnosis left upper extremity amputationprocedures left abdominal flap x cm left forearm debridement skin subcutaneous tissue muscle bone closure wounds simple closure approximately cm placement vac negative pressure wound dressingindications yearold male suffered amputation left upper extremity complications injury presents time attempts closureoperative findings clean wound left upper extremity partial dehiscence previously closed wounds also closure satisfactorydescription procedure inhalational anesthesia prepped draped usual fashion exposing left upper extremity also exposing continuity left abdomen chest groin underwent systematic evaluation wound left upper extremity excised first whole wound prior additional closure areas dehisced appeared approximation granulation tissue result edges freshened prior approximating fashion simple closure accomplished total length approximately cm noted prior procedure appropriate timeout performed received prophylactic antibiotics indicated require dvt prophylaxis time accomplished debridement simple closure removing skin subcutaneous tissue muscle bone well closing arm could design flap abdomen flap designed slightly greater ellipse skin costal margin elevated level external oblique laid left forearm donors site closed using interrupted vicryl deep dermis running subcuticular monocryl skin steristrips applied time flap inset using monocryl sutures ultimately vac negative pressure wound dressing applied help hold place optimize vascularization flap patient tolerated procedure well returned recovery room satisfactory condition

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Left upper extremity amputation.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Left upper extremity amputation.,PROCEDURES:,1. Left abdominal flap 5 x 5 cm to left forearm.,2. Debridement of skin, subcutaneous tissue, muscle, and bone.,3. Closure of wounds, simple closure approximately 8 cm.,4. Placement of VAC negative pressure wound dressing.,INDICATIONS: , This 3-year-old male suffered amputation of his left upper extremity with complications of injury. He presents at this time for further attempts at closure.,OPERATIVE FINDINGS: , A clean wound to left upper extremity with partial dehiscence of previously closed wounds and also the closure was satisfactory.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: , Under inhalational anesthesia, he was prepped and draped in usual fashion exposing left upper extremity and also exposing continuity of the left abdomen, chest, and groin. He underwent systematic evaluation of his wound of his left upper extremity and we excised first the whole wound prior to doing some additional closure. Some areas were dehisced and appeared to be because it was approximation of granulation tissue and as a result the edges were freshened up prior to approximating them. In this fashion, simple closure was accomplished and its total length was approximately 8 cm. It should be noted that prior to doing any procedure that appropriate timeout was performed and he received prophylactic antibiotics as indicated and did not require DVT prophylaxis. At this time, once we accomplished debridement and simple closure removing skin, subcutaneous tissue, muscle and bone as well as closing the arm, we could design our flap for the abdomen. The flap was designed as a slightly greater than 1:1 ellipse of skin from just below the costal margin. This was elevated at the level of the external oblique and then laid on the left forearm. The donor's site was closed using interrupted 4-0 Vicryl in the deep dermis and running subcuticular 4-0 Monocryl on the skin. Steri-Strips were applied. At this time, the flap was inset using again 4-0 Monocryl sutures and then ultimately the VAC negative pressure wound dressing was applied to help hold this in place and optimize the vascularization of the flap. The patient tolerated the procedure well and he returned to the recovery room in satisfactory condition. ### Response: Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Lipodystrophy of the abdomen and thighs.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Lipodystrophy of the abdomen and thighs.,OPERATION: , Suction-assisted lipectomy.,ANESTHESIA:, General.,FINDINGS AND PROCEDURE:, With the patient under satisfactory general endotracheal anesthesia, the entire abdomen, flanks, perineum, and thighs to the knees were prepped and draped circumferentially in sterile fashion. After this had been completed, a #15 blade was used to make small stab wounds in the lateral hips, the pubic area, and upper edge of the umbilicus. Through these small incisions, a cannula was used to infiltrate lactated Ringers with 1000 cc was infiltrated initially into the abdomen. A 3 and 4-mm cannulas were then used to carry out the liposuction of the abdomen removing a total of 1100 cc of aspirate, which was mostly fat, little fluid, and blood. Attention was then directed to the thighs both inner and outer. A total of 1000 cc was infiltrated in both lateral thighs only about 50 cc in the medial thighs. After this had been completed, 3 and 4-mm cannulas were used to suction 650 cc from each side, approximately 50 cc in the inner thigh and 600 on each lateral thigh. The patient tolerated the procedure very well. All of this aspirate was mostly fat with little fluid and very little blood. Wounds were cleaned and steri-stripped and dressing of ABD pads and ***** was then applied. The patient tolerated the procedure very well and was sent to the recovery room in good condition.

preoperative diagnosis lipodystrophy abdomen thighspostoperative diagnosis lipodystrophy abdomen thighsoperation suctionassisted lipectomyanesthesia generalfindings procedure patient satisfactory general endotracheal anesthesia entire abdomen flanks perineum thighs knees prepped draped circumferentially sterile fashion completed blade used make small stab wounds lateral hips pubic area upper edge umbilicus small incisions cannula used infiltrate lactated ringers cc infiltrated initially abdomen mm cannulas used carry liposuction abdomen removing total cc aspirate mostly fat little fluid blood attention directed thighs inner outer total cc infiltrated lateral thighs cc medial thighs completed mm cannulas used suction cc side approximately cc inner thigh lateral thigh patient tolerated procedure well aspirate mostly fat little fluid little blood wounds cleaned steristripped dressing abd pads applied patient tolerated procedure well sent recovery room good condition

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Lipodystrophy of the abdomen and thighs.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Lipodystrophy of the abdomen and thighs.,OPERATION: , Suction-assisted lipectomy.,ANESTHESIA:, General.,FINDINGS AND PROCEDURE:, With the patient under satisfactory general endotracheal anesthesia, the entire abdomen, flanks, perineum, and thighs to the knees were prepped and draped circumferentially in sterile fashion. After this had been completed, a #15 blade was used to make small stab wounds in the lateral hips, the pubic area, and upper edge of the umbilicus. Through these small incisions, a cannula was used to infiltrate lactated Ringers with 1000 cc was infiltrated initially into the abdomen. A 3 and 4-mm cannulas were then used to carry out the liposuction of the abdomen removing a total of 1100 cc of aspirate, which was mostly fat, little fluid, and blood. Attention was then directed to the thighs both inner and outer. A total of 1000 cc was infiltrated in both lateral thighs only about 50 cc in the medial thighs. After this had been completed, 3 and 4-mm cannulas were used to suction 650 cc from each side, approximately 50 cc in the inner thigh and 600 on each lateral thigh. The patient tolerated the procedure very well. All of this aspirate was mostly fat with little fluid and very little blood. Wounds were cleaned and steri-stripped and dressing of ABD pads and ***** was then applied. The patient tolerated the procedure very well and was sent to the recovery room in good condition. ### Response: Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Low Back Syndrome - Low Back Pain.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Same.,PROCEDURE:,1. Bilateral facet Arthrogram at L34, L45, L5S1.,2. Bilateral facet injections at L34, L45, L5S1.,3. Interpretation of radiograph.,ANESTHESIA: ,IV sedation with Versed and Fentanyl.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS: , None.,COMPLICATIONS: ,None.,INDICATION: , Pain in the lumbar spine secondary to facet arthrosis that was demonstrated by physical examination and verified with x-ray studies and imaging scans.,SUMMARY OF PROCEDURE: , The patient was admitted to the OR, consent was obtained and signed. The patient was taken to the Operating room and was placed in the prone position. Monitors were placed, including EKG, pulse oximeter and blood pressure monitoring. Prior to sedation vitals signs were obtained and were continuously monitored throughout the procedure for amount of pain or changes in pain, EKG, respiration and heart rate and at intervals of three minutes for blood pressure. After adequate IV sedation with Versed and Fentanyl the procedure was begun.,The lumbar sacral regions were prepped and draped in sterile fashion with Betadine prep and four sterile towels.,The facets in the lumbar regions were visualized with Fluoroscopy using an anterior posterior view. A skin wheal was placed with 1% Lidocaine at the L34 facet region on the left. Under fluoroscopic guidance a 22 gauge spinal needle was then placed into the L34 facet on the left side. This was performed using the oblique view under fluoroscopy to the enable the view of the "Scotty Dog," After obtaining the "Scotty Dog" view the joints were easily seen. Negative aspiration was carefully performed to verity that there was no venous, arterial or cerebral spinal fluid flow. After negative aspiration was verified, 1/8th of a cc of Omnipaque 240 dye was then injected. Negative aspiration was again performed and 1/2 cc of solution (Solution consisting of 9 cc of 0.5% Marcaine with 1 cc of Triamcinolone) was then injected into the joint. The needle was then withdrawn out of the joint and 1.5 cc of this same solution was injected around the joint. The 22-gauge needle was then removed. Pressure was place over the puncture site for approximately one minute. This exact same procedure was then repeated along the left-sided facets at L45, and L5S1. This exact same procedure was then repeated on the right side. At each level, vigilance was carried out during the aspiration of the needle to verify negative flow of blood or cerebral spinal fluid.,The patient was noted to have tolerated the procedure well without any complications.,Interpretation of the radiograph revealed placement of the 22-gauge spinal needles into the left-sided and right-sided facet joints at, L34, L45, and L5S1. Visualizing the "Scotty Dog" technique under fluoroscopy facilitated this. Dye spread into each joint space is visualized. No venous or arterial run-off is noted. No epidural run-off is noted. The joints were noted to have chronic inflammatory changes noted characteristic of facet arthrosis.

preoperative diagnosis low back syndrome low back painpostoperative diagnosis sameprocedure bilateral facet arthrogram l l ls bilateral facet injections l l ls interpretation radiographanesthesia iv sedation versed fentanylestimated blood loss nonecomplications noneindication pain lumbar spine secondary facet arthrosis demonstrated physical examination verified xray studies imaging scanssummary procedure patient admitted consent obtained signed patient taken operating room placed prone position monitors placed including ekg pulse oximeter blood pressure monitoring prior sedation vitals signs obtained continuously monitored throughout procedure amount pain changes pain ekg respiration heart rate intervals three minutes blood pressure adequate iv sedation versed fentanyl procedure begunthe lumbar sacral regions prepped draped sterile fashion betadine prep four sterile towelsthe facets lumbar regions visualized fluoroscopy using anterior posterior view skin wheal placed lidocaine l facet region left fluoroscopic guidance gauge spinal needle placed l facet left side performed using oblique view fluoroscopy enable view scotty dog obtaining scotty dog view joints easily seen negative aspiration carefully performed verity venous arterial cerebral spinal fluid flow negative aspiration verified th cc omnipaque dye injected negative aspiration performed cc solution solution consisting cc marcaine cc triamcinolone injected joint needle withdrawn joint cc solution injected around joint gauge needle removed pressure place puncture site approximately one minute exact procedure repeated along leftsided facets l ls exact procedure repeated right side level vigilance carried aspiration needle verify negative flow blood cerebral spinal fluidthe patient noted tolerated procedure well without complicationsinterpretation radiograph revealed placement gauge spinal needles leftsided rightsided facet joints l l ls visualizing scotty dog technique fluoroscopy facilitated dye spread joint space visualized venous arterial runoff noted epidural runoff noted joints noted chronic inflammatory changes noted characteristic facet arthrosis

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Low Back Syndrome - Low Back Pain.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Same.,PROCEDURE:,1. Bilateral facet Arthrogram at L34, L45, L5S1.,2. Bilateral facet injections at L34, L45, L5S1.,3. Interpretation of radiograph.,ANESTHESIA: ,IV sedation with Versed and Fentanyl.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS: , None.,COMPLICATIONS: ,None.,INDICATION: , Pain in the lumbar spine secondary to facet arthrosis that was demonstrated by physical examination and verified with x-ray studies and imaging scans.,SUMMARY OF PROCEDURE: , The patient was admitted to the OR, consent was obtained and signed. The patient was taken to the Operating room and was placed in the prone position. Monitors were placed, including EKG, pulse oximeter and blood pressure monitoring. Prior to sedation vitals signs were obtained and were continuously monitored throughout the procedure for amount of pain or changes in pain, EKG, respiration and heart rate and at intervals of three minutes for blood pressure. After adequate IV sedation with Versed and Fentanyl the procedure was begun.,The lumbar sacral regions were prepped and draped in sterile fashion with Betadine prep and four sterile towels.,The facets in the lumbar regions were visualized with Fluoroscopy using an anterior posterior view. A skin wheal was placed with 1% Lidocaine at the L34 facet region on the left. Under fluoroscopic guidance a 22 gauge spinal needle was then placed into the L34 facet on the left side. This was performed using the oblique view under fluoroscopy to the enable the view of the "Scotty Dog," After obtaining the "Scotty Dog" view the joints were easily seen. Negative aspiration was carefully performed to verity that there was no venous, arterial or cerebral spinal fluid flow. After negative aspiration was verified, 1/8th of a cc of Omnipaque 240 dye was then injected. Negative aspiration was again performed and 1/2 cc of solution (Solution consisting of 9 cc of 0.5% Marcaine with 1 cc of Triamcinolone) was then injected into the joint. The needle was then withdrawn out of the joint and 1.5 cc of this same solution was injected around the joint. The 22-gauge needle was then removed. Pressure was place over the puncture site for approximately one minute. This exact same procedure was then repeated along the left-sided facets at L45, and L5S1. This exact same procedure was then repeated on the right side. At each level, vigilance was carried out during the aspiration of the needle to verify negative flow of blood or cerebral spinal fluid.,The patient was noted to have tolerated the procedure well without any complications.,Interpretation of the radiograph revealed placement of the 22-gauge spinal needles into the left-sided and right-sided facet joints at, L34, L45, and L5S1. Visualizing the "Scotty Dog" technique under fluoroscopy facilitated this. Dye spread into each joint space is visualized. No venous or arterial run-off is noted. No epidural run-off is noted. The joints were noted to have chronic inflammatory changes noted characteristic of facet arthrosis. ### Response: Pain Management, Radiology, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Low back pain.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Low back pain.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED:,1. Lumbar discogram L2-3.,2. Lumbar discogram L3-4.,3. Lumbar discogram L4-5.,4. Lumbar discogram L5-S1.,ANESTHESIA: ,IV sedation.,PROCEDURE IN DETAIL: ,The patient was brought to the Radiology Suite and placed prone onto a radiolucent table. The C-arm was brought into the operative field and AP, left right oblique and lateral fluoroscopic images of the L1-2 through L5-S1 levels were obtained. We then proceeded to prepare the low back with a Betadine solution and draped sterile. Using an oblique approach to the spine, the L5-S1 level was addressed using an oblique projection angled C-arm in order to allow for perpendicular penetration of the disc space. A metallic marker was then placed laterally and a needle entrance point was determined. A skin wheal was raised with 1% Xylocaine and an #18-gauge needle was advanced up to the level of the disc space using AP, oblique and lateral fluoroscopic projections. A second needle, #22-gauge 6-inch needle was then introduced into the disc space and with AP and lateral fluoroscopic projections, was placed into the center of the nucleus. We then proceeded to perform a similar placement of needles at the L4-5, L3-4 and L2-3 levels.,A solution of Isovue 300 with 1 gm of Ancef was then drawn into a 10 cc syringe and without informing the patient of our injecting, we then proceeded to inject the disc spaces sequentially.

preoperative diagnosis low back painpostoperative diagnosis low back painprocedure performed lumbar discogram l lumbar discogram l lumbar discogram l lumbar discogram lsanesthesia iv sedationprocedure detail patient brought radiology suite placed prone onto radiolucent table carm brought operative field ap left right oblique lateral fluoroscopic images l ls levels obtained proceeded prepare low back betadine solution draped sterile using oblique approach spine ls level addressed using oblique projection angled carm order allow perpendicular penetration disc space metallic marker placed laterally needle entrance point determined skin wheal raised xylocaine gauge needle advanced level disc space using ap oblique lateral fluoroscopic projections second needle gauge inch needle introduced disc space ap lateral fluoroscopic projections placed center nucleus proceeded perform similar placement needles l l l levelsa solution isovue gm ancef drawn cc syringe without informing patient injecting proceeded inject disc spaces sequentially

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Low back pain.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Low back pain.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED:,1. Lumbar discogram L2-3.,2. Lumbar discogram L3-4.,3. Lumbar discogram L4-5.,4. Lumbar discogram L5-S1.,ANESTHESIA: ,IV sedation.,PROCEDURE IN DETAIL: ,The patient was brought to the Radiology Suite and placed prone onto a radiolucent table. The C-arm was brought into the operative field and AP, left right oblique and lateral fluoroscopic images of the L1-2 through L5-S1 levels were obtained. We then proceeded to prepare the low back with a Betadine solution and draped sterile. Using an oblique approach to the spine, the L5-S1 level was addressed using an oblique projection angled C-arm in order to allow for perpendicular penetration of the disc space. A metallic marker was then placed laterally and a needle entrance point was determined. A skin wheal was raised with 1% Xylocaine and an #18-gauge needle was advanced up to the level of the disc space using AP, oblique and lateral fluoroscopic projections. A second needle, #22-gauge 6-inch needle was then introduced into the disc space and with AP and lateral fluoroscopic projections, was placed into the center of the nucleus. We then proceeded to perform a similar placement of needles at the L4-5, L3-4 and L2-3 levels.,A solution of Isovue 300 with 1 gm of Ancef was then drawn into a 10 cc syringe and without informing the patient of our injecting, we then proceeded to inject the disc spaces sequentially. ### Response: Neurology, Orthopedic, Pain Management, Radiology, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Low back pain.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Low back pain.,PROCEDURE: , Lumbar epidural steroid injection, L5-S1.,ANESTHESIA: , Local.,SPECIAL EQUIPMENT: , Fluoroscopic unit.,DETAILS OF PROCEDURE: , The patient was taken to the Radiology Suite and was placed in the prone position where the entire back region was scrubbed, prepped, and draped in a sterile fashion with Betadine solution. The lumbar area was then draped with sterile towels and sterile drapes. The surgeon was gloved with sterile gloves and mask in order to create a sterile environment for the epidural injection. The fluoroscopy x-ray unit was then brought into the sterile field for a PA x-ray visualization of the spine. A Steinmann pin was then placed across the spine to localize the level of the planned injection. Local infiltration using 0.5% preservative-free Xylocaine via a 25-gauge needle was then placed into the dermis and subcutaneous tissue. A Tuohy needle was then oriented perpendicular to the skin and was then advanced through the dermis and subcutaneous tissues. Continuous injection of 0.5% preservative-free Xylocaine was used during the advancement of the Tuohy needle into the deeper spinous tissues. A solution of 80 mg of Depo-Medrol with 2 cc of 1% Xylocaine injectable and 5 cc of normal saline were then injected into the epidural space.

preoperative diagnosis low back painpostoperative diagnosis low back painprocedure lumbar epidural steroid injection lsanesthesia localspecial equipment fluoroscopic unitdetails procedure patient taken radiology suite placed prone position entire back region scrubbed prepped draped sterile fashion betadine solution lumbar area draped sterile towels sterile drapes surgeon gloved sterile gloves mask order create sterile environment epidural injection fluoroscopy xray unit brought sterile field pa xray visualization spine steinmann pin placed across spine localize level planned injection local infiltration using preservativefree xylocaine via gauge needle placed dermis subcutaneous tissue tuohy needle oriented perpendicular skin advanced dermis subcutaneous tissues continuous injection preservativefree xylocaine used advancement tuohy needle deeper spinous tissues solution mg depomedrol cc xylocaine injectable cc normal saline injected epidural space

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Low back pain.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Low back pain.,PROCEDURE: , Lumbar epidural steroid injection, L5-S1.,ANESTHESIA: , Local.,SPECIAL EQUIPMENT: , Fluoroscopic unit.,DETAILS OF PROCEDURE: , The patient was taken to the Radiology Suite and was placed in the prone position where the entire back region was scrubbed, prepped, and draped in a sterile fashion with Betadine solution. The lumbar area was then draped with sterile towels and sterile drapes. The surgeon was gloved with sterile gloves and mask in order to create a sterile environment for the epidural injection. The fluoroscopy x-ray unit was then brought into the sterile field for a PA x-ray visualization of the spine. A Steinmann pin was then placed across the spine to localize the level of the planned injection. Local infiltration using 0.5% preservative-free Xylocaine via a 25-gauge needle was then placed into the dermis and subcutaneous tissue. A Tuohy needle was then oriented perpendicular to the skin and was then advanced through the dermis and subcutaneous tissues. Continuous injection of 0.5% preservative-free Xylocaine was used during the advancement of the Tuohy needle into the deeper spinous tissues. A solution of 80 mg of Depo-Medrol with 2 cc of 1% Xylocaine injectable and 5 cc of normal saline were then injected into the epidural space. ### Response: Pain Management

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Lumbar stenosis.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSES:, Lumbar stenosis and cerebrospinal fluid fistula.,TITLE OF THE OPERATION,1. Lumbar laminectomy for decompression with foraminotomies L3-L4, L4-L5, L5-S1 microtechniques.,2. Repair of CSF fistula, microtechniques L5-S1, application of DuraSeal.,INDICATIONS:, The patient is an 82-year-old woman who has about a four-month history now of urinary incontinence and numbness in her legs and hands, and difficulty ambulating. She was evaluated with an MRI scan, which showed a very high-grade stenosis in her lumbar spine, and subsequent evaluation included a myelogram, which demonstrated cervical stenosis at C4-C5, C5-C6, and C6-C7 as well as a complete block of the contrast at L4-L5 and no contrast at L5-S1 either and stenosis at L3-L4 and all the way up, but worse at L3-L4, L4-L5, and L5-S1. Yesterday, she underwent an anterior cervical discectomy and fusions C4-C5, C5-C6, C6-C7 and had some improvement of her symptoms and increased strength, even in the recovery room. She was kept in the ICU because of her age and the need to bring her back to the operating room today for decompressive lumbar laminectomy. The rationale for putting the surgery is close together that she is normally on Coumadin for atrial fibrillation, though she has been cardioverted. She and her son understand the nature, indications, and risks of the surgery, and agreed to go ahead.,PROCEDURE: , The patient was brought from the Neuro ICU to the operating room, where general endotracheal anesthesia was obtained. She was rolled in a prone position on the Wilson frame. The back was prepared in the usual manner with Betadine soak, followed by Betadine paint. Markings were applied. Sterile drapes were applied. Using the usual anatomical landmarks, linear midline incision was made presumed over L4-L5 and L5-S1. Sharp dissection was carried down into subcutaneous tissue, then Bovie electrocautery was used to isolate the spinous processes. A Kocher clamp was placed in the anterior spinous ligament and this turned out to be L5-S1. The incision was extended rostrally and deep Gelpi's were inserted to expose the spinous processes and lamina of L3, L4, L5, and S1. Using the Leksell rongeur, the spinous processes of L4 and L5 were removed completely, and the caudal part of L3. A high-speed drill was then used to thin the caudal lamina of L3, all of the lamina of L4 and of L5. Then using various Kerrison punches, I proceeded to perform a laminectomy. Removing the L5 lamina, there was a dural band attached to the ligamentum flavum and this caused about a 3-mm tear in the dura. There was CSF leak. The lamina removal was continued, ligamentum flavum was removed to expose all the dura. Then using 4-0 Nurolon suture, a running-locking suture was used to close the approximate 3-mm long dural fistula. There was no CSF leak with Valsalva.,I then continued the laminectomy removing all of the lamina of L5 and of L4, removing the ligamentum flavum between L3-L4, L4-L5 and L5-S1. Foraminotomies were accomplished bilaterally. The caudal aspect of the lamina of L3 also was removed. The dura came up quite nicely. I explored out along the L4, L5, and S1 nerve roots after completing the foraminotomies, the roots were quite free. Further more, the thecal sac came up quite nicely. In order to ensure no CSF leak, we would follow the patient out of the operating room. The dural closure was covered with a small piece of fat. This was all then covered with DuraSeal glue. Gelfoam was placed on top of this, then the muscle was closed with interrupted 0 Ethibond. The lumbodorsal fascia was closed with multiple sutures of interrupted 0 Ethibond in a watertight fashion. Scarpa's fascia was closed with a running 0 Vicryl, and finally the skin was closed with a running-locking 3-0 nylon. The wound was blocked with 0.5% plain Marcaine.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS: Estimated blood loss for the case was about 100 mL.,SPONGE AND NEEDLE COUNTS: Correct.,FINDINGS: A very tight high-grade stenosis at L3-L4, L4-L5, and L5-S1. There were adhesions between the dura and the ligamentum flavum owing to the severity and length of the stenosis.,The patient tolerated the procedure well with stable vitals throughout.

preoperative diagnosis lumbar stenosispostoperative diagnoses lumbar stenosis cerebrospinal fluid fistulatitle operation lumbar laminectomy decompression foraminotomies ls microtechniques repair csf fistula microtechniques ls application durasealindications patient yearold woman fourmonth history urinary incontinence numbness legs hands difficulty ambulating evaluated mri scan showed highgrade stenosis lumbar spine subsequent evaluation included myelogram demonstrated cervical stenosis cc cc cc well complete block contrast contrast ls either stenosis way worse ls yesterday underwent anterior cervical discectomy fusions cc cc cc improvement symptoms increased strength even recovery room kept icu age need bring back operating room today decompressive lumbar laminectomy rationale putting surgery close together normally coumadin atrial fibrillation though cardioverted son understand nature indications risks surgery agreed go aheadprocedure patient brought neuro icu operating room general endotracheal anesthesia obtained rolled prone position wilson frame back prepared usual manner betadine soak followed betadine paint markings applied sterile drapes applied using usual anatomical landmarks linear midline incision made presumed ls sharp dissection carried subcutaneous tissue bovie electrocautery used isolate spinous processes kocher clamp placed anterior spinous ligament turned ls incision extended rostrally deep gelpis inserted expose spinous processes lamina l l l using leksell rongeur spinous processes l l removed completely caudal part l highspeed drill used thin caudal lamina l lamina l l using various kerrison punches proceeded perform laminectomy removing l lamina dural band attached ligamentum flavum caused mm tear dura csf leak lamina removal continued ligamentum flavum removed expose dura using nurolon suture runninglocking suture used close approximate mm long dural fistula csf leak valsalvai continued laminectomy removing lamina l l removing ligamentum flavum ls foraminotomies accomplished bilaterally caudal aspect lamina l also removed dura came quite nicely explored along l l nerve roots completing foraminotomies roots quite free thecal sac came quite nicely order ensure csf leak would follow patient operating room dural closure covered small piece fat covered duraseal glue gelfoam placed top muscle closed interrupted ethibond lumbodorsal fascia closed multiple sutures interrupted ethibond watertight fashion scarpas fascia closed running vicryl finally skin closed runninglocking nylon wound blocked plain marcaineestimated blood loss estimated blood loss case mlsponge needle counts correctfindings tight highgrade stenosis ls adhesions dura ligamentum flavum owing severity length stenosisthe patient tolerated procedure well stable vitals throughout

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Lumbar stenosis.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSES:, Lumbar stenosis and cerebrospinal fluid fistula.,TITLE OF THE OPERATION,1. Lumbar laminectomy for decompression with foraminotomies L3-L4, L4-L5, L5-S1 microtechniques.,2. Repair of CSF fistula, microtechniques L5-S1, application of DuraSeal.,INDICATIONS:, The patient is an 82-year-old woman who has about a four-month history now of urinary incontinence and numbness in her legs and hands, and difficulty ambulating. She was evaluated with an MRI scan, which showed a very high-grade stenosis in her lumbar spine, and subsequent evaluation included a myelogram, which demonstrated cervical stenosis at C4-C5, C5-C6, and C6-C7 as well as a complete block of the contrast at L4-L5 and no contrast at L5-S1 either and stenosis at L3-L4 and all the way up, but worse at L3-L4, L4-L5, and L5-S1. Yesterday, she underwent an anterior cervical discectomy and fusions C4-C5, C5-C6, C6-C7 and had some improvement of her symptoms and increased strength, even in the recovery room. She was kept in the ICU because of her age and the need to bring her back to the operating room today for decompressive lumbar laminectomy. The rationale for putting the surgery is close together that she is normally on Coumadin for atrial fibrillation, though she has been cardioverted. She and her son understand the nature, indications, and risks of the surgery, and agreed to go ahead.,PROCEDURE: , The patient was brought from the Neuro ICU to the operating room, where general endotracheal anesthesia was obtained. She was rolled in a prone position on the Wilson frame. The back was prepared in the usual manner with Betadine soak, followed by Betadine paint. Markings were applied. Sterile drapes were applied. Using the usual anatomical landmarks, linear midline incision was made presumed over L4-L5 and L5-S1. Sharp dissection was carried down into subcutaneous tissue, then Bovie electrocautery was used to isolate the spinous processes. A Kocher clamp was placed in the anterior spinous ligament and this turned out to be L5-S1. The incision was extended rostrally and deep Gelpi's were inserted to expose the spinous processes and lamina of L3, L4, L5, and S1. Using the Leksell rongeur, the spinous processes of L4 and L5 were removed completely, and the caudal part of L3. A high-speed drill was then used to thin the caudal lamina of L3, all of the lamina of L4 and of L5. Then using various Kerrison punches, I proceeded to perform a laminectomy. Removing the L5 lamina, there was a dural band attached to the ligamentum flavum and this caused about a 3-mm tear in the dura. There was CSF leak. The lamina removal was continued, ligamentum flavum was removed to expose all the dura. Then using 4-0 Nurolon suture, a running-locking suture was used to close the approximate 3-mm long dural fistula. There was no CSF leak with Valsalva.,I then continued the laminectomy removing all of the lamina of L5 and of L4, removing the ligamentum flavum between L3-L4, L4-L5 and L5-S1. Foraminotomies were accomplished bilaterally. The caudal aspect of the lamina of L3 also was removed. The dura came up quite nicely. I explored out along the L4, L5, and S1 nerve roots after completing the foraminotomies, the roots were quite free. Further more, the thecal sac came up quite nicely. In order to ensure no CSF leak, we would follow the patient out of the operating room. The dural closure was covered with a small piece of fat. This was all then covered with DuraSeal glue. Gelfoam was placed on top of this, then the muscle was closed with interrupted 0 Ethibond. The lumbodorsal fascia was closed with multiple sutures of interrupted 0 Ethibond in a watertight fashion. Scarpa's fascia was closed with a running 0 Vicryl, and finally the skin was closed with a running-locking 3-0 nylon. The wound was blocked with 0.5% plain Marcaine.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS: Estimated blood loss for the case was about 100 mL.,SPONGE AND NEEDLE COUNTS: Correct.,FINDINGS: A very tight high-grade stenosis at L3-L4, L4-L5, and L5-S1. There were adhesions between the dura and the ligamentum flavum owing to the severity and length of the stenosis.,The patient tolerated the procedure well with stable vitals throughout. ### Response: Neurosurgery, Orthopedic, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Malignant mass of the left neck.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Malignant mass of the left neck, squamous cell carcinoma.,PROCEDURES,1. Left neck mass biopsy.,2. Selective surgical neck dissection, left.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE:, After obtaining an informed, the patient was taken to the operating room where a time-out process was followed. Preoperative antibiotic was given and Dr. X proceeded to intubate the patient after a detailed anesthetic preparation that started in the Same Day Surgery and followed in the operating room. Finally, a 5.5-French endotracheal tube was inserted and the patient was able to tolerate that and did have stable vital signs and a proper oxygenation.,Then, the patient was positioned with the neck slightly distended and turned toward the opposite side of the operation. The neck was prepped and draped in the usual fashion. I proceeded to mark the site of the mass and then also to mark the proposed site for the creation of a flap. Then, I performed an extensive anesthetic block of the area.,Then, an incision was made along the area marked for development of the flap, but in a very limited extent, just to expose the cervical mass. The cervical mass, which was about 4 cm in diameter and very firm and rubbery, was found lodged between the sternocleidomastoid muscle and the internal jugular vein in the area III of the neck. A wedge sample was sent to Pathology for frozen section. At the same time, we waited for the result and the initial report was not clear in the sense that a lot of lymphoepithelial reaction was seen. Therefore, a larger sample was sent to Pathology and at that particular time, the fresh frozen was reported as having squamous elements. This was not totally clear in my mind and therefore I proceeded to excise the full mass, which luckily was not attached to any structures except in the very deep surface. There, there were some attachments to branches of the external carotid artery, which had to be suture ligated. At any rate, the whole specimen was to the lab and finally the diagnosis was that of a metastatic squamous cell carcinoma.,With that information in hand, we proceeded to continue with a neck dissection and proceeded to make an incision along the previously marked sites of the flap, which basically involved a reverse U shape on the left neck. This worked out quite nicely. The external jugular vein was out of the way, so initially we did not deal with it. We proceeded to tackle the area III and extended into II-A. When we excised the mass, the upper end was in intimate relationship with the parotid gland, which was relatively large in this patient, but it looked normal otherwise. Also, I felt that the submaxillary gland was enlarged. At any rate, we decided to clean up the areas III and IV and a few nodes from II-A that were removed, and then we went into the posterior triangle where we identified the spinal accessory nerve, which we protected, actually did not even dissect close to it.,The same nerve had been already identified anterior to the internal jugular vein, very proximally behind the digastric and the sternocleidomastoid muscle. At any rate, there were large nodes in the posterior triangle, in areas V-A and V-B, which were excised and sent to Pathology for examination. Also, there was a remnant of a capsule of the main mass that we proceeded to excise and sent to Pathology as an extra specimen. Hemostasis was revised and found to be adequate. The flaps had been protected by folding it to the chest and protected by wet sponges on both sides of the flap. The flap was replaced in its position. A soft Jackson-Pratt catheter was left in the area, and then we proceeded to approximate the flap with a number of subcutaneous sutures of Vicryl and then running sutures of subcuticular Monocryl to the skin. I would like to mention that also the facial vein was excised and the external jugular vein was ligated. It was in very lateral location and it was on the site of the drain, so we ligated that but did not excise it. A pressure dressing was applied.,The patient tolerated the procedure well. Estimated blood loss was no more than 100 mL. The patient was extubated in the operating room and sent for recovery.

preoperative diagnosis malignant mass left neckpostoperative diagnosis malignant mass left neck squamous cell carcinomaprocedures left neck mass biopsy selective surgical neck dissection leftdescription procedure obtaining informed patient taken operating room timeout process followed preoperative antibiotic given dr x proceeded intubate patient detailed anesthetic preparation started day surgery followed operating room finally french endotracheal tube inserted patient able tolerate stable vital signs proper oxygenationthen patient positioned neck slightly distended turned toward opposite side operation neck prepped draped usual fashion proceeded mark site mass also mark proposed site creation flap performed extensive anesthetic block areathen incision made along area marked development flap limited extent expose cervical mass cervical mass cm diameter firm rubbery found lodged sternocleidomastoid muscle internal jugular vein area iii neck wedge sample sent pathology frozen section time waited result initial report clear sense lot lymphoepithelial reaction seen therefore larger sample sent pathology particular time fresh frozen reported squamous elements totally clear mind therefore proceeded excise full mass luckily attached structures except deep surface attachments branches external carotid artery suture ligated rate whole specimen lab finally diagnosis metastatic squamous cell carcinomawith information hand proceeded continue neck dissection proceeded make incision along previously marked sites flap basically involved reverse u shape left neck worked quite nicely external jugular vein way initially deal proceeded tackle area iii extended iia excised mass upper end intimate relationship parotid gland relatively large patient looked normal otherwise also felt submaxillary gland enlarged rate decided clean areas iii iv nodes iia removed went posterior triangle identified spinal accessory nerve protected actually even dissect close itthe nerve already identified anterior internal jugular vein proximally behind digastric sternocleidomastoid muscle rate large nodes posterior triangle areas va vb excised sent pathology examination also remnant capsule main mass proceeded excise sent pathology extra specimen hemostasis revised found adequate flaps protected folding chest protected wet sponges sides flap flap replaced position soft jacksonpratt catheter left area proceeded approximate flap number subcutaneous sutures vicryl running sutures subcuticular monocryl skin would like mention also facial vein excised external jugular vein ligated lateral location site drain ligated excise pressure dressing appliedthe patient tolerated procedure well estimated blood loss ml patient extubated operating room sent recovery

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Malignant mass of the left neck.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Malignant mass of the left neck, squamous cell carcinoma.,PROCEDURES,1. Left neck mass biopsy.,2. Selective surgical neck dissection, left.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE:, After obtaining an informed, the patient was taken to the operating room where a time-out process was followed. Preoperative antibiotic was given and Dr. X proceeded to intubate the patient after a detailed anesthetic preparation that started in the Same Day Surgery and followed in the operating room. Finally, a 5.5-French endotracheal tube was inserted and the patient was able to tolerate that and did have stable vital signs and a proper oxygenation.,Then, the patient was positioned with the neck slightly distended and turned toward the opposite side of the operation. The neck was prepped and draped in the usual fashion. I proceeded to mark the site of the mass and then also to mark the proposed site for the creation of a flap. Then, I performed an extensive anesthetic block of the area.,Then, an incision was made along the area marked for development of the flap, but in a very limited extent, just to expose the cervical mass. The cervical mass, which was about 4 cm in diameter and very firm and rubbery, was found lodged between the sternocleidomastoid muscle and the internal jugular vein in the area III of the neck. A wedge sample was sent to Pathology for frozen section. At the same time, we waited for the result and the initial report was not clear in the sense that a lot of lymphoepithelial reaction was seen. Therefore, a larger sample was sent to Pathology and at that particular time, the fresh frozen was reported as having squamous elements. This was not totally clear in my mind and therefore I proceeded to excise the full mass, which luckily was not attached to any structures except in the very deep surface. There, there were some attachments to branches of the external carotid artery, which had to be suture ligated. At any rate, the whole specimen was to the lab and finally the diagnosis was that of a metastatic squamous cell carcinoma.,With that information in hand, we proceeded to continue with a neck dissection and proceeded to make an incision along the previously marked sites of the flap, which basically involved a reverse U shape on the left neck. This worked out quite nicely. The external jugular vein was out of the way, so initially we did not deal with it. We proceeded to tackle the area III and extended into II-A. When we excised the mass, the upper end was in intimate relationship with the parotid gland, which was relatively large in this patient, but it looked normal otherwise. Also, I felt that the submaxillary gland was enlarged. At any rate, we decided to clean up the areas III and IV and a few nodes from II-A that were removed, and then we went into the posterior triangle where we identified the spinal accessory nerve, which we protected, actually did not even dissect close to it.,The same nerve had been already identified anterior to the internal jugular vein, very proximally behind the digastric and the sternocleidomastoid muscle. At any rate, there were large nodes in the posterior triangle, in areas V-A and V-B, which were excised and sent to Pathology for examination. Also, there was a remnant of a capsule of the main mass that we proceeded to excise and sent to Pathology as an extra specimen. Hemostasis was revised and found to be adequate. The flaps had been protected by folding it to the chest and protected by wet sponges on both sides of the flap. The flap was replaced in its position. A soft Jackson-Pratt catheter was left in the area, and then we proceeded to approximate the flap with a number of subcutaneous sutures of Vicryl and then running sutures of subcuticular Monocryl to the skin. I would like to mention that also the facial vein was excised and the external jugular vein was ligated. It was in very lateral location and it was on the site of the drain, so we ligated that but did not excise it. A pressure dressing was applied.,The patient tolerated the procedure well. Estimated blood loss was no more than 100 mL. The patient was extubated in the operating room and sent for recovery. ### Response: Hematology - Oncology, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Malignant pleural effusion, left, with dyspnea.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Malignant pleural effusion, left, with dyspnea.,PROCEDURE: ,Thoracentesis, left.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: , The patient was brought to the recovery area of the operating room. After obtaining the informed consent, the patient's posterior left chest wall was prepped and draped in usual fashion. Xylocaine 1% was infiltrated above the seventh intercostal space in the midscapular line. Initially, I tried to use the thoracentesis set after 1% Xylocaine had been infiltrated, but the needle of the system was just too short to reach the pleural cavity due to the patient's very thick chest wall. Therefore, I had to use a #18 spinal needle, which I had to use almost in its entire length to reach the fluid. From then on, I proceeded manually to withdraw 2000 mL of a light milky fluid.,The patient tolerated the procedure fairly well, but almost at the end of it she said that she was feeling like fainting and therefore we carefully withdrew the needle. At that time, it was getting difficult to withdraw fluid anyway and we allowed her to lie down and after a few minutes the patient was feeling fine. At any rate, we gave her bolus of 250 mL of normal saline and the patient returned to her room for additional hours of observation. We then thought that if she was doing fine, then we will send her home.,A chest x-ray was performed after the procedure which showed a dramatic reduction of the amount of pleural fluid and then there was no pneumothorax or no other obvious complications of her procedure.,

preoperative diagnosis malignant pleural effusion left dyspneapostoperative diagnosis malignant pleural effusion left dyspneaprocedure thoracentesis leftdescription procedure patient brought recovery area operating room obtaining informed consent patients posterior left chest wall prepped draped usual fashion xylocaine infiltrated seventh intercostal space midscapular line initially tried use thoracentesis set xylocaine infiltrated needle system short reach pleural cavity due patients thick chest wall therefore use spinal needle use almost entire length reach fluid proceeded manually withdraw ml light milky fluidthe patient tolerated procedure fairly well almost end said feeling like fainting therefore carefully withdrew needle time getting difficult withdraw fluid anyway allowed lie minutes patient feeling fine rate gave bolus ml normal saline patient returned room additional hours observation thought fine send homea chest xray performed procedure showed dramatic reduction amount pleural fluid pneumothorax obvious complications procedure

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Malignant pleural effusion, left, with dyspnea.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Malignant pleural effusion, left, with dyspnea.,PROCEDURE: ,Thoracentesis, left.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: , The patient was brought to the recovery area of the operating room. After obtaining the informed consent, the patient's posterior left chest wall was prepped and draped in usual fashion. Xylocaine 1% was infiltrated above the seventh intercostal space in the midscapular line. Initially, I tried to use the thoracentesis set after 1% Xylocaine had been infiltrated, but the needle of the system was just too short to reach the pleural cavity due to the patient's very thick chest wall. Therefore, I had to use a #18 spinal needle, which I had to use almost in its entire length to reach the fluid. From then on, I proceeded manually to withdraw 2000 mL of a light milky fluid.,The patient tolerated the procedure fairly well, but almost at the end of it she said that she was feeling like fainting and therefore we carefully withdrew the needle. At that time, it was getting difficult to withdraw fluid anyway and we allowed her to lie down and after a few minutes the patient was feeling fine. At any rate, we gave her bolus of 250 mL of normal saline and the patient returned to her room for additional hours of observation. We then thought that if she was doing fine, then we will send her home.,A chest x-ray was performed after the procedure which showed a dramatic reduction of the amount of pleural fluid and then there was no pneumothorax or no other obvious complications of her procedure., ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Mesothelioma.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Mesothelioma.,OPERATIVE PROCEDURE: , Placement of Port-A-Cath, left subclavian vein with fluoroscopy.,ASSISTANT:, None.,ANESTHESIA: , General endotracheal.,COMPLICATIONS:, None.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: , The patient is a 74-year-old gentleman who underwent right thoracoscopy and was found to have biopsy-proven mesothelioma. He was brought to the operating room now for Port-A-Cath placement for chemotherapy. After informed consent was obtained with the patient, the patient was taken to the operating room, placed in supine position. After induction of general endotracheal anesthesia, routine prep and drape of the left chest, left subclavian vein was cannulated with #18 gauze needle, and guidewire was inserted. Needle was removed. Small incision was made large enough to harbor the port. Dilator and introducers were then placed over the guidewire. Guidewire and dilator were removed, and a Port-A-Cath was introduced in the subclavian vein through the introducers. Introducers were peeled away without difficulty. He measured with fluoroscopy and cut to the appropriate length. The tip of the catheter was noted to be at the junction of the superior vena cava and right atrium. It was then connected to the hub of the port. Port was then aspirated for patency and flushed with heparinized saline and summoned to the chest wall. Wounds were then closed. Needle count, sponge count, and instrument counts were all correct.

preoperative diagnosis mesotheliomapostoperative diagnosis mesotheliomaoperative procedure placement portacath left subclavian vein fluoroscopyassistant noneanesthesia general endotrachealcomplications nonedescription procedure patient yearold gentleman underwent right thoracoscopy found biopsyproven mesothelioma brought operating room portacath placement chemotherapy informed consent obtained patient patient taken operating room placed supine position induction general endotracheal anesthesia routine prep drape left chest left subclavian vein cannulated gauze needle guidewire inserted needle removed small incision made large enough harbor port dilator introducers placed guidewire guidewire dilator removed portacath introduced subclavian vein introducers introducers peeled away without difficulty measured fluoroscopy cut appropriate length tip catheter noted junction superior vena cava right atrium connected hub port port aspirated patency flushed heparinized saline summoned chest wall wounds closed needle count sponge count instrument counts correct

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Mesothelioma.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Mesothelioma.,OPERATIVE PROCEDURE: , Placement of Port-A-Cath, left subclavian vein with fluoroscopy.,ASSISTANT:, None.,ANESTHESIA: , General endotracheal.,COMPLICATIONS:, None.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: , The patient is a 74-year-old gentleman who underwent right thoracoscopy and was found to have biopsy-proven mesothelioma. He was brought to the operating room now for Port-A-Cath placement for chemotherapy. After informed consent was obtained with the patient, the patient was taken to the operating room, placed in supine position. After induction of general endotracheal anesthesia, routine prep and drape of the left chest, left subclavian vein was cannulated with #18 gauze needle, and guidewire was inserted. Needle was removed. Small incision was made large enough to harbor the port. Dilator and introducers were then placed over the guidewire. Guidewire and dilator were removed, and a Port-A-Cath was introduced in the subclavian vein through the introducers. Introducers were peeled away without difficulty. He measured with fluoroscopy and cut to the appropriate length. The tip of the catheter was noted to be at the junction of the superior vena cava and right atrium. It was then connected to the hub of the port. Port was then aspirated for patency and flushed with heparinized saline and summoned to the chest wall. Wounds were then closed. Needle count, sponge count, and instrument counts were all correct. ### Response: Hematology - Oncology, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Metastatic papillary cancer, left neck.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Metastatic papillary cancer, left neck.,OPERATION PERFORMED: , Left neck dissection.,ANESTHESIA: ,General endotracheal.,INDICATIONS: , The patient is a very nice gentleman, who has had thyroid cancer, papillary cell type, removed with a total thyroidectomy and then subsequently recurrent disease was removed with a paratracheal dissection. He now has evidence of lesion in the left mid neck and the left superior neck on ultrasound, which are suspicious for recurrent cancer. Left neck dissection is indicated.,DESCRIPTION OF OPERATION: , The patient was placed on the operating room table in the supine position. After adequate general endotracheal anesthesia was administered, the table was then turned. A shoulder roll placed under the shoulders and the face was placed in an extended fashion. The left neck, chest, and face were prepped with Betadine and draped in a sterile fashion. A hockey stick skin incision was performed, extending a previous incision line superiorly towards the mastoid cortex through skin, subcutaneous tissue and platysma with Bovie electrocautery on cut mode. Subplatysmal superior and inferior flaps were raised. The dissection was left lateral neck dissection encompassing zones 1, 2A, 2B, 3, and the superior portion of 4. The sternocleidomastoid muscle was unwrapped at its fascial attachment and this was taken back posterior to the XI cranial nerve into the superior posterior most triangle of the neck. This was carried forward off of the deep rooted muscles including the splenius capitis and anterior and middle scalenes taken medially off of these muscles including the fascia of the muscles, stripped from the carotid artery, the X cranial nerve, the internal jugular vein and then carried anteriorly to the lateral most extent of the dissection previously done by Dr. X in the paratracheal region. The submandibular gland was removed as well. The X, XI, and XII cranial nerves were preserved. The internal jugular vein and carotid artery were preserved as well. Copious irrigation of the wound bed showed no identifiable bleeding at the termination of the procedure. There were two obviously positive nodes in this neck dissection. One was left medial neck just lateral to the previous tracheal dissection and one was in the mid region of zone 2. A #10 flat fluted Blake drain was placed through a separate stab incision and it was secured to the skin with a 2-0 silk ligature. The wound was closed in layers using a 3-0 Vicryl in a buried knot interrupted fashion for the subcutaneous tissue and the skin was closed with staples. A fluff and Kling pressure dressing was then applied. The patient was extubated in the operating room, brought to the recovery room in satisfactory condition. There were no intraoperative complications.

preoperative diagnosis metastatic papillary cancer left neckpostoperative diagnosis metastatic papillary cancer left neckoperation performed left neck dissectionanesthesia general endotrachealindications patient nice gentleman thyroid cancer papillary cell type removed total thyroidectomy subsequently recurrent disease removed paratracheal dissection evidence lesion left mid neck left superior neck ultrasound suspicious recurrent cancer left neck dissection indicateddescription operation patient placed operating room table supine position adequate general endotracheal anesthesia administered table turned shoulder roll placed shoulders face placed extended fashion left neck chest face prepped betadine draped sterile fashion hockey stick skin incision performed extending previous incision line superiorly towards mastoid cortex skin subcutaneous tissue platysma bovie electrocautery cut mode subplatysmal superior inferior flaps raised dissection left lateral neck dissection encompassing zones b superior portion sternocleidomastoid muscle unwrapped fascial attachment taken back posterior xi cranial nerve superior posterior triangle neck carried forward deep rooted muscles including splenius capitis anterior middle scalenes taken medially muscles including fascia muscles stripped carotid artery x cranial nerve internal jugular vein carried anteriorly lateral extent dissection previously done dr x paratracheal region submandibular gland removed well x xi xii cranial nerves preserved internal jugular vein carotid artery preserved well copious irrigation wound bed showed identifiable bleeding termination procedure two obviously positive nodes neck dissection one left medial neck lateral previous tracheal dissection one mid region zone flat fluted blake drain placed separate stab incision secured skin silk ligature wound closed layers using vicryl buried knot interrupted fashion subcutaneous tissue skin closed staples fluff kling pressure dressing applied patient extubated operating room brought recovery room satisfactory condition intraoperative complications

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Metastatic papillary cancer, left neck.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Metastatic papillary cancer, left neck.,OPERATION PERFORMED: , Left neck dissection.,ANESTHESIA: ,General endotracheal.,INDICATIONS: , The patient is a very nice gentleman, who has had thyroid cancer, papillary cell type, removed with a total thyroidectomy and then subsequently recurrent disease was removed with a paratracheal dissection. He now has evidence of lesion in the left mid neck and the left superior neck on ultrasound, which are suspicious for recurrent cancer. Left neck dissection is indicated.,DESCRIPTION OF OPERATION: , The patient was placed on the operating room table in the supine position. After adequate general endotracheal anesthesia was administered, the table was then turned. A shoulder roll placed under the shoulders and the face was placed in an extended fashion. The left neck, chest, and face were prepped with Betadine and draped in a sterile fashion. A hockey stick skin incision was performed, extending a previous incision line superiorly towards the mastoid cortex through skin, subcutaneous tissue and platysma with Bovie electrocautery on cut mode. Subplatysmal superior and inferior flaps were raised. The dissection was left lateral neck dissection encompassing zones 1, 2A, 2B, 3, and the superior portion of 4. The sternocleidomastoid muscle was unwrapped at its fascial attachment and this was taken back posterior to the XI cranial nerve into the superior posterior most triangle of the neck. This was carried forward off of the deep rooted muscles including the splenius capitis and anterior and middle scalenes taken medially off of these muscles including the fascia of the muscles, stripped from the carotid artery, the X cranial nerve, the internal jugular vein and then carried anteriorly to the lateral most extent of the dissection previously done by Dr. X in the paratracheal region. The submandibular gland was removed as well. The X, XI, and XII cranial nerves were preserved. The internal jugular vein and carotid artery were preserved as well. Copious irrigation of the wound bed showed no identifiable bleeding at the termination of the procedure. There were two obviously positive nodes in this neck dissection. One was left medial neck just lateral to the previous tracheal dissection and one was in the mid region of zone 2. A #10 flat fluted Blake drain was placed through a separate stab incision and it was secured to the skin with a 2-0 silk ligature. The wound was closed in layers using a 3-0 Vicryl in a buried knot interrupted fashion for the subcutaneous tissue and the skin was closed with staples. A fluff and Kling pressure dressing was then applied. The patient was extubated in the operating room, brought to the recovery room in satisfactory condition. There were no intraoperative complications. ### Response: ENT - Otolaryngology, Hematology - Oncology, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Metopic synostosis with trigonocephaly.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Metopic synostosis with trigonocephaly.,PROCEDURES PERFORMED: , ,1. Bilateral orbital frontozygomatic craniotomy with bilateral orbital advancement with Z-osteotomies.,2. Bone grafts.,3. Bilateral forehead reconstruction with autologous graft.,ANESTHESIA: , General endotracheal anesthesia.,COMPLICATIONS:, None.,CONDITION OF THE PATIENT AT THE END OF THE PROCEDURE: , Stable, transferred to recovery room.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS: , 300 mL.,CRYSTALLOIDS: , Packed red blood cells 440 mL, FFP 100 mL.,URINARY OUTPUT: , 160 mL.,INDICATIONS FOR PROCEDURE: , The patient is a 9-month-old baby with a history of trigonocephaly and metopic synostosis. We have discussed locations, the nature of trigonocephaly's repair, metopic synostosis repair with bilateral fronto-orbital advancement, forehead reconstruction, and bone graft. We have discussed risks and benefits. Risks included, but not limited to risk of bleeding, infection, dehiscence, scarring, need for future revision surgeries, minimal possibility of death, the alternatives, devastating bleeding, anesthesia, death, dehiscence, infection. The parents understand, decide to proceed with surgery. Informed consent was obtained and we proceed with surgery.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: , The patient was taken into the operating room, placed in the supine position. General anesthetic was administered. Prophylactic dose of antibiotic was given. Lines were placed by Anesthesia and then the head of the bed was turned to 100 degrees. The patient was once more positioned and padded in the usual manner. The incision was marked with the help of a marking pen and local anesthetic was infiltrated after prepping the area one time, then the definitive prep and draping of the area was done.,The procedure began with an incision through the full-thickness of the skin into the subcutaneous tissue down to the subgaleal plane. The subgaleal plane was developed and reflected anteriorly and slightly posteriorly. Hemostasis achieved with electrocautery. Raney clips were applied to both flaps to prevent significant bleeding. Then, we proceed with craniotomy part and Dr. Y proceeded with this part of the procedure. I assisted her and this will be described in a different operative report. Then, the area corresponding to the C-shaped osteotomy was marked and then we proceed in conjunction with Dr. Y to develop these osteotomies with the help of the Midas by retracting the contents of the skull at the level of the anterior fossa as well as the orbital contents with the help of a ribbon retractor. The osteotomies were done with the Midas and some irrigation. There was an osteotomy done at the level of the frontozygomatic suture just posterior to the frontozygomatic suture and then these osteotomies continued down intraorbitally and lateral through the zygoma to the level of the intraorbital rim. This was done on both sides. Hemostasis achieved with bone wax and electrocautery. Once the osteotomies were completed, __________ of the osteotomy sites allowed advancements. On the left side, there was a minor fracture to the superior orbital rim that was plated. The bone grafts were customized placing these at the level of the sphenoid bone in the posterior aspect of the orbital rim. The temporalis muscle was advanced and attached to the orbital rim with holes that have been drilled with Midas and a 3-0 Vicryl interrupted stitches. The forehead flaps were attached with the help of absorbable mesh. The forehead portions were applied to the fronto-orbital advancement of fronto-orbital piece with the help of Synthes mesh and 3-mm screws. Hemostasis was checked. The flaps were retracted back into position.,The wound was closed with 3-0 Vicryl interrupted sutures, 4-0 Vicryl interrupted stitches, and 5-0 running fast absorbing gut. Dressing was applied with Xeroform, bacitracin, and ABDs and a burn net. The patient tolerated the procedure well without complications and was transferred to the recovery room in stable condition. I was present and participated in all aspects of the procedure. Sponge, needle, and instrument counts were completed at the end of the procedure.

preoperative diagnosis metopic synostosis trigonocephalypostoperative diagnosis metopic synostosis trigonocephalyprocedures performed bilateral orbital frontozygomatic craniotomy bilateral orbital advancement zosteotomies bone grafts bilateral forehead reconstruction autologous graftanesthesia general endotracheal anesthesiacomplications nonecondition patient end procedure stable transferred recovery roomestimated blood loss mlcrystalloids packed red blood cells ml ffp mlurinary output mlindications procedure patient monthold baby history trigonocephaly metopic synostosis discussed locations nature trigonocephalys repair metopic synostosis repair bilateral frontoorbital advancement forehead reconstruction bone graft discussed risks benefits risks included limited risk bleeding infection dehiscence scarring need future revision surgeries minimal possibility death alternatives devastating bleeding anesthesia death dehiscence infection parents understand decide proceed surgery informed consent obtained proceed surgerydescription procedure patient taken operating room placed supine position general anesthetic administered prophylactic dose antibiotic given lines placed anesthesia head bed turned degrees patient positioned padded usual manner incision marked help marking pen local anesthetic infiltrated prepping area one time definitive prep draping area donethe procedure began incision fullthickness skin subcutaneous tissue subgaleal plane subgaleal plane developed reflected anteriorly slightly posteriorly hemostasis achieved electrocautery raney clips applied flaps prevent significant bleeding proceed craniotomy part dr proceeded part procedure assisted described different operative report area corresponding cshaped osteotomy marked proceed conjunction dr develop osteotomies help midas retracting contents skull level anterior fossa well orbital contents help ribbon retractor osteotomies done midas irrigation osteotomy done level frontozygomatic suture posterior frontozygomatic suture osteotomies continued intraorbitally lateral zygoma level intraorbital rim done sides hemostasis achieved bone wax electrocautery osteotomies completed __________ osteotomy sites allowed advancements left side minor fracture superior orbital rim plated bone grafts customized placing level sphenoid bone posterior aspect orbital rim temporalis muscle advanced attached orbital rim holes drilled midas vicryl interrupted stitches forehead flaps attached help absorbable mesh forehead portions applied frontoorbital advancement frontoorbital piece help synthes mesh mm screws hemostasis checked flaps retracted back positionthe wound closed vicryl interrupted sutures vicryl interrupted stitches running fast absorbing gut dressing applied xeroform bacitracin abds burn net patient tolerated procedure well without complications transferred recovery room stable condition present participated aspects procedure sponge needle instrument counts completed end procedure

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Metopic synostosis with trigonocephaly.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Metopic synostosis with trigonocephaly.,PROCEDURES PERFORMED: , ,1. Bilateral orbital frontozygomatic craniotomy with bilateral orbital advancement with Z-osteotomies.,2. Bone grafts.,3. Bilateral forehead reconstruction with autologous graft.,ANESTHESIA: , General endotracheal anesthesia.,COMPLICATIONS:, None.,CONDITION OF THE PATIENT AT THE END OF THE PROCEDURE: , Stable, transferred to recovery room.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS: , 300 mL.,CRYSTALLOIDS: , Packed red blood cells 440 mL, FFP 100 mL.,URINARY OUTPUT: , 160 mL.,INDICATIONS FOR PROCEDURE: , The patient is a 9-month-old baby with a history of trigonocephaly and metopic synostosis. We have discussed locations, the nature of trigonocephaly's repair, metopic synostosis repair with bilateral fronto-orbital advancement, forehead reconstruction, and bone graft. We have discussed risks and benefits. Risks included, but not limited to risk of bleeding, infection, dehiscence, scarring, need for future revision surgeries, minimal possibility of death, the alternatives, devastating bleeding, anesthesia, death, dehiscence, infection. The parents understand, decide to proceed with surgery. Informed consent was obtained and we proceed with surgery.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: , The patient was taken into the operating room, placed in the supine position. General anesthetic was administered. Prophylactic dose of antibiotic was given. Lines were placed by Anesthesia and then the head of the bed was turned to 100 degrees. The patient was once more positioned and padded in the usual manner. The incision was marked with the help of a marking pen and local anesthetic was infiltrated after prepping the area one time, then the definitive prep and draping of the area was done.,The procedure began with an incision through the full-thickness of the skin into the subcutaneous tissue down to the subgaleal plane. The subgaleal plane was developed and reflected anteriorly and slightly posteriorly. Hemostasis achieved with electrocautery. Raney clips were applied to both flaps to prevent significant bleeding. Then, we proceed with craniotomy part and Dr. Y proceeded with this part of the procedure. I assisted her and this will be described in a different operative report. Then, the area corresponding to the C-shaped osteotomy was marked and then we proceed in conjunction with Dr. Y to develop these osteotomies with the help of the Midas by retracting the contents of the skull at the level of the anterior fossa as well as the orbital contents with the help of a ribbon retractor. The osteotomies were done with the Midas and some irrigation. There was an osteotomy done at the level of the frontozygomatic suture just posterior to the frontozygomatic suture and then these osteotomies continued down intraorbitally and lateral through the zygoma to the level of the intraorbital rim. This was done on both sides. Hemostasis achieved with bone wax and electrocautery. Once the osteotomies were completed, __________ of the osteotomy sites allowed advancements. On the left side, there was a minor fracture to the superior orbital rim that was plated. The bone grafts were customized placing these at the level of the sphenoid bone in the posterior aspect of the orbital rim. The temporalis muscle was advanced and attached to the orbital rim with holes that have been drilled with Midas and a 3-0 Vicryl interrupted stitches. The forehead flaps were attached with the help of absorbable mesh. The forehead portions were applied to the fronto-orbital advancement of fronto-orbital piece with the help of Synthes mesh and 3-mm screws. Hemostasis was checked. The flaps were retracted back into position.,The wound was closed with 3-0 Vicryl interrupted sutures, 4-0 Vicryl interrupted stitches, and 5-0 running fast absorbing gut. Dressing was applied with Xeroform, bacitracin, and ABDs and a burn net. The patient tolerated the procedure well without complications and was transferred to the recovery room in stable condition. I was present and participated in all aspects of the procedure. Sponge, needle, and instrument counts were completed at the end of the procedure. ### Response: Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Microscopic hematuria.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Microscopic hematuria with lateral lobe obstruction, mild.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED: , Flexible cystoscopy.,COMPLICATIONS: , None.,CONDITION: , Stable.,PROCEDURE: , The patient was placed in the supine position and sterilely prepped and draped in the usual fashion. After 2% lidocaine was instilled, the anterior urethra is normal. The prostatic urethra reveals mild lateral lobe obstruction. There are no bladder tumors noted.,IMPRESSION:, The patient has some mild benign prostatic hyperplasia. At this point in time, we will continue with conservative observation.,PLAN: , The patient will follow up as needed.

preoperative diagnosis microscopic hematuriapostoperative diagnosis microscopic hematuria lateral lobe obstruction mildprocedure performed flexible cystoscopycomplications nonecondition stableprocedure patient placed supine position sterilely prepped draped usual fashion lidocaine instilled anterior urethra normal prostatic urethra reveals mild lateral lobe obstruction bladder tumors notedimpression patient mild benign prostatic hyperplasia point time continue conservative observationplan patient follow needed

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Microscopic hematuria.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Microscopic hematuria with lateral lobe obstruction, mild.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED: , Flexible cystoscopy.,COMPLICATIONS: , None.,CONDITION: , Stable.,PROCEDURE: , The patient was placed in the supine position and sterilely prepped and draped in the usual fashion. After 2% lidocaine was instilled, the anterior urethra is normal. The prostatic urethra reveals mild lateral lobe obstruction. There are no bladder tumors noted.,IMPRESSION:, The patient has some mild benign prostatic hyperplasia. At this point in time, we will continue with conservative observation.,PLAN: , The patient will follow up as needed. ### Response: Surgery, Urology

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Missed abortion.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: ,Missed abortion.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED: , Suction, dilation, and curettage.,ANESTHESIA: , Spinal.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS:, 50 mL.,COMPLICATIONS: , None.,FINDINGS: , Products of conception consistent with a 6-week intrauterine pregnancy.,INDICATIONS: , The patient is a 28-year-old gravida 4, para 3 female at 13 weeks by her last menstrual period and 6 weeks by an ultrasound today in the emergency room who presents with heavy bleeding starting today. A workup done in the emergency room revealed a beta-quant level of 1931 and an ultrasound showing an intrauterine pregnancy with a crown-rump length consistent with a 6-week and 2-day pregnancy. No heart tones were visible. On examination in the emergency room, a moderate amount of bleeding was noted.,Additionally, the cervix was noted to be 1 cm dilated. These findings were discussed with the patient and options including surgical management via dilation and curettage versus management with misoprostol versus expected management were discussed with the patient. After discussion of these options, the patient opted for a suction, dilation, and curettage. The patient was described to the patient in detail including risks of infection, bleeding, injury to surrounding organs including risk of perforation. Informed consent was obtained prior to proceeding with the procedure.,PROCEDURE NOTE: ,The patient was taken to the operating room where spinal anesthesia was administered without difficulty. The patient was prepped and draped in usual sterile fashion in lithotomy position. A weighted speculum was placed. The anterior lip of the cervix was grasped with a single tooth tenaculum. At this time, a 7-mm suction curettage was advanced into the uterine cavity without difficulty and was used to suction contents of the uterus. Following removal of the products of conception, a sharp curette was advanced into the uterine cavity and was used to scrape the four walls of the uterus until a gritty texture was noted. At this time, the suction curette was advanced one additional time to suction any remaining products. All instruments were removed. Hemostasis was visualized. The patient was stable at the completion of the procedure. Sponge, lap, and instrument counts were correct.

preoperative diagnosis missed abortionpostoperative diagnosis missed abortionprocedure performed suction dilation curettageanesthesia spinalestimated blood loss mlcomplications nonefindings products conception consistent week intrauterine pregnancyindications patient yearold gravida para female weeks last menstrual period weeks ultrasound today emergency room presents heavy bleeding starting today workup done emergency room revealed betaquant level ultrasound showing intrauterine pregnancy crownrump length consistent week day pregnancy heart tones visible examination emergency room moderate amount bleeding notedadditionally cervix noted cm dilated findings discussed patient options including surgical management via dilation curettage versus management misoprostol versus expected management discussed patient discussion options patient opted suction dilation curettage patient described patient detail including risks infection bleeding injury surrounding organs including risk perforation informed consent obtained prior proceeding procedureprocedure note patient taken operating room spinal anesthesia administered without difficulty patient prepped draped usual sterile fashion lithotomy position weighted speculum placed anterior lip cervix grasped single tooth tenaculum time mm suction curettage advanced uterine cavity without difficulty used suction contents uterus following removal products conception sharp curette advanced uterine cavity used scrape four walls uterus gritty texture noted time suction curette advanced one additional time suction remaining products instruments removed hemostasis visualized patient stable completion procedure sponge lap instrument counts correct

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Missed abortion.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: ,Missed abortion.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED: , Suction, dilation, and curettage.,ANESTHESIA: , Spinal.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS:, 50 mL.,COMPLICATIONS: , None.,FINDINGS: , Products of conception consistent with a 6-week intrauterine pregnancy.,INDICATIONS: , The patient is a 28-year-old gravida 4, para 3 female at 13 weeks by her last menstrual period and 6 weeks by an ultrasound today in the emergency room who presents with heavy bleeding starting today. A workup done in the emergency room revealed a beta-quant level of 1931 and an ultrasound showing an intrauterine pregnancy with a crown-rump length consistent with a 6-week and 2-day pregnancy. No heart tones were visible. On examination in the emergency room, a moderate amount of bleeding was noted.,Additionally, the cervix was noted to be 1 cm dilated. These findings were discussed with the patient and options including surgical management via dilation and curettage versus management with misoprostol versus expected management were discussed with the patient. After discussion of these options, the patient opted for a suction, dilation, and curettage. The patient was described to the patient in detail including risks of infection, bleeding, injury to surrounding organs including risk of perforation. Informed consent was obtained prior to proceeding with the procedure.,PROCEDURE NOTE: ,The patient was taken to the operating room where spinal anesthesia was administered without difficulty. The patient was prepped and draped in usual sterile fashion in lithotomy position. A weighted speculum was placed. The anterior lip of the cervix was grasped with a single tooth tenaculum. At this time, a 7-mm suction curettage was advanced into the uterine cavity without difficulty and was used to suction contents of the uterus. Following removal of the products of conception, a sharp curette was advanced into the uterine cavity and was used to scrape the four walls of the uterus until a gritty texture was noted. At this time, the suction curette was advanced one additional time to suction any remaining products. All instruments were removed. Hemostasis was visualized. The patient was stable at the completion of the procedure. Sponge, lap, and instrument counts were correct. ### Response: Obstetrics / Gynecology, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Morbid obesity. ,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Morbid obesity. ,PROCEDURE:, Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, antecolic, antegastric with 25-mm EEA anastamosis, esophagogastroduodenoscopy. ,ANESTHESIA: , General with endotracheal intubation. ,INDICATIONS FOR PROCEDURE: , This is a 50-year-old male who has been overweight for many years and has tried multiple different weight loss diets and programs. The patient has now begun to have comorbidities related to the obesity. The patient has attended our bariatric seminar and met with our dietician and psychologist. The patient has read through our comprehensive handout and understands the risks and benefits of bypass surgery as evidenced by the signing of our consent form.,PROCEDURE IN DETAIL: , The risks and benefits were explained to the patient. Consent was obtained. The patient was taken to the operating room and placed supine on the operating room table. General anesthesia was administered with endotracheal intubation. A Foley catheter was placed for bladder decompression. All pressure points were carefully padded, and sequential compression devices were placed on the legs. The abdomen was prepped and draped in standard, sterile, surgical fashion. Marcaine was injected into the umbilicus.

preoperative diagnosis morbid obesity postoperative diagnosis morbid obesity procedure laparoscopic rouxeny gastric bypass antecolic antegastric mm eea anastamosis esophagogastroduodenoscopy anesthesia general endotracheal intubation indications procedure yearold male overweight many years tried multiple different weight loss diets programs patient begun comorbidities related obesity patient attended bariatric seminar met dietician psychologist patient read comprehensive handout understands risks benefits bypass surgery evidenced signing consent formprocedure detail risks benefits explained patient consent obtained patient taken operating room placed supine operating room table general anesthesia administered endotracheal intubation foley catheter placed bladder decompression pressure points carefully padded sequential compression devices placed legs abdomen prepped draped standard sterile surgical fashion marcaine injected umbilicus

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Morbid obesity. ,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Morbid obesity. ,PROCEDURE:, Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, antecolic, antegastric with 25-mm EEA anastamosis, esophagogastroduodenoscopy. ,ANESTHESIA: , General with endotracheal intubation. ,INDICATIONS FOR PROCEDURE: , This is a 50-year-old male who has been overweight for many years and has tried multiple different weight loss diets and programs. The patient has now begun to have comorbidities related to the obesity. The patient has attended our bariatric seminar and met with our dietician and psychologist. The patient has read through our comprehensive handout and understands the risks and benefits of bypass surgery as evidenced by the signing of our consent form.,PROCEDURE IN DETAIL: , The risks and benefits were explained to the patient. Consent was obtained. The patient was taken to the operating room and placed supine on the operating room table. General anesthesia was administered with endotracheal intubation. A Foley catheter was placed for bladder decompression. All pressure points were carefully padded, and sequential compression devices were placed on the legs. The abdomen was prepped and draped in standard, sterile, surgical fashion. Marcaine was injected into the umbilicus. ### Response: Gastroenterology, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Morbid obesity.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: ,Morbid obesity.,PROCEDURE: , Laparoscopic antecolic antegastric Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with EEA anastomosis.,ANESTHESIA: , General with endotracheal intubation.,INDICATION FOR PROCEDURE: , This is a 30-year-old female, who has been overweight for many years. She has tried many different diets, but is unsuccessful. She has been to our Bariatric Surgery Seminar, received some handouts, and signed the consent. The risks and benefits of the procedure have been explained to the patient.,PROCEDURE IN DETAIL: ,The patient was taken to the operating room and placed supine on the operating room table. All pressure points were carefully padded. She was given general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. SCD stockings were placed on both legs. Foley catheter was placed for bladder decompression. The abdomen was then prepped and draped in standard sterile surgical fashion. Marcaine was then injected through umbilicus. A small incision was made. A Veress needle was introduced into the abdomen. CO2 insufflation was done to a maximum pressure of 15 mmHg. A 12-mm VersaStep port was placed through the umbilicus. I then placed a 5-mm port just anterior to the midaxillary line and just subcostal on the right side. I placed another 5-mm port in the midclavicular line just subcostal on the right side, a few centimeters below and medial to that, I placed a 12-mm VersaStep port. On the left side, just anterior to the midaxillary line and just subcostal, I placed a 5-mm port. A few centimeters below and medial to that, I placed a 15-mm port. I began by lifting up the omentum and identifying the transverse colon and lifting that up and thereby identifying my ligament of Treitz. I ran the small bowel down approximately 40 cm and divided the small bowel with a white load GIA stapler. I then divided the mesentery all the way down to the base of the mesentery with a LigaSure device. I then ran the distal bowel down, approximately 100 cm, and at 100 cm, I made a hole at the antimesenteric portion of the Roux limb and a hole in the antimesenteric portion of the duodenogastric limb, and I passed a 45 white load stapler and fired a stapler creating a side-to-side anastomosis. I reapproximated the edges of the defect. I lifted it up and stapled across it with another white load stapler. I then closed the mesenteric defect with interrupted Surgidac sutures. I divided the omentum all the way down to the colon in order to create a passageway for my small bowel to go antecolic. I then put the patient in reverse Trendelenburg. I placed a liver retractor, identified, and dissected the angle of His. I then dissected on the lesser curve, approximately 2.5 cm below the gastroesophageal junction, and got into a lesser space. I fired transversely across the stomach with a 45 blue load stapler. I then used two fires of the 60 blue load with SeamGuard to go up into my angle of His, thereby creating my gastric pouch. I then made a hole at the base of the gastric pouch and had Anesthesia remove the bougie and place the OG tube connected to the anvil. I pulled the anvil into place, and I then opened up my 15-mm port site and passed my EEA stapler. I passed that in the end of my Roux limb and had the spike come out antimesenteric. I joined the spike with the anvil and fired a stapler creating an end-to-side anastomosis, then divided across the redundant portion of my Roux limb with a white load GI stapler, and removed it with an Endocatch bag. I put some additional 2-0 Vicryl sutures in the anastomosis for further security. I then placed a bowel clamp across the bowel. I went above and passed an EGD scope into the mouth down to the esophagus and into the gastric pouch. I distended gastric pouch with air. There was no air leak seen. I could pass the scope easily through the anastomosis. There was no bleeding seen through the scope. We closed the 15-mm port site with interrupted 0 Vicryl suture utilizing Carter-Thomason. I copiously irrigated out that incision with about 2 L of saline. I then closed the skin of all incisions with running Monocryl. Sponge, instrument, and needle counts were correct at the end of the case. The patient tolerated the procedure well without any complications.

preoperative diagnosis morbid obesitypostoperative diagnosis morbid obesityprocedure laparoscopic antecolic antegastric rouxeny gastric bypass eea anastomosisanesthesia general endotracheal intubationindication procedure yearold female overweight many years tried many different diets unsuccessful bariatric surgery seminar received handouts signed consent risks benefits procedure explained patientprocedure detail patient taken operating room placed supine operating room table pressure points carefully padded given general anesthesia endotracheal intubation scd stockings placed legs foley catheter placed bladder decompression abdomen prepped draped standard sterile surgical fashion marcaine injected umbilicus small incision made veress needle introduced abdomen co insufflation done maximum pressure mmhg mm versastep port placed umbilicus placed mm port anterior midaxillary line subcostal right side placed another mm port midclavicular line subcostal right side centimeters medial placed mm versastep port left side anterior midaxillary line subcostal placed mm port centimeters medial placed mm port began lifting omentum identifying transverse colon lifting thereby identifying ligament treitz ran small bowel approximately cm divided small bowel white load gia stapler divided mesentery way base mesentery ligasure device ran distal bowel approximately cm cm made hole antimesenteric portion roux limb hole antimesenteric portion duodenogastric limb passed white load stapler fired stapler creating sidetoside anastomosis reapproximated edges defect lifted stapled across another white load stapler closed mesenteric defect interrupted surgidac sutures divided omentum way colon order create passageway small bowel go antecolic put patient reverse trendelenburg placed liver retractor identified dissected angle dissected lesser curve approximately cm gastroesophageal junction got lesser space fired transversely across stomach blue load stapler used two fires blue load seamguard go angle thereby creating gastric pouch made hole base gastric pouch anesthesia remove bougie place og tube connected anvil pulled anvil place opened mm port site passed eea stapler passed end roux limb spike come antimesenteric joined spike anvil fired stapler creating endtoside anastomosis divided across redundant portion roux limb white load gi stapler removed endocatch bag put additional vicryl sutures anastomosis security placed bowel clamp across bowel went passed egd scope mouth esophagus gastric pouch distended gastric pouch air air leak seen could pass scope easily anastomosis bleeding seen scope closed mm port site interrupted vicryl suture utilizing carterthomason copiously irrigated incision l saline closed skin incisions running monocryl sponge instrument needle counts correct end case patient tolerated procedure well without complications

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Morbid obesity.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: ,Morbid obesity.,PROCEDURE: , Laparoscopic antecolic antegastric Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with EEA anastomosis.,ANESTHESIA: , General with endotracheal intubation.,INDICATION FOR PROCEDURE: , This is a 30-year-old female, who has been overweight for many years. She has tried many different diets, but is unsuccessful. She has been to our Bariatric Surgery Seminar, received some handouts, and signed the consent. The risks and benefits of the procedure have been explained to the patient.,PROCEDURE IN DETAIL: ,The patient was taken to the operating room and placed supine on the operating room table. All pressure points were carefully padded. She was given general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. SCD stockings were placed on both legs. Foley catheter was placed for bladder decompression. The abdomen was then prepped and draped in standard sterile surgical fashion. Marcaine was then injected through umbilicus. A small incision was made. A Veress needle was introduced into the abdomen. CO2 insufflation was done to a maximum pressure of 15 mmHg. A 12-mm VersaStep port was placed through the umbilicus. I then placed a 5-mm port just anterior to the midaxillary line and just subcostal on the right side. I placed another 5-mm port in the midclavicular line just subcostal on the right side, a few centimeters below and medial to that, I placed a 12-mm VersaStep port. On the left side, just anterior to the midaxillary line and just subcostal, I placed a 5-mm port. A few centimeters below and medial to that, I placed a 15-mm port. I began by lifting up the omentum and identifying the transverse colon and lifting that up and thereby identifying my ligament of Treitz. I ran the small bowel down approximately 40 cm and divided the small bowel with a white load GIA stapler. I then divided the mesentery all the way down to the base of the mesentery with a LigaSure device. I then ran the distal bowel down, approximately 100 cm, and at 100 cm, I made a hole at the antimesenteric portion of the Roux limb and a hole in the antimesenteric portion of the duodenogastric limb, and I passed a 45 white load stapler and fired a stapler creating a side-to-side anastomosis. I reapproximated the edges of the defect. I lifted it up and stapled across it with another white load stapler. I then closed the mesenteric defect with interrupted Surgidac sutures. I divided the omentum all the way down to the colon in order to create a passageway for my small bowel to go antecolic. I then put the patient in reverse Trendelenburg. I placed a liver retractor, identified, and dissected the angle of His. I then dissected on the lesser curve, approximately 2.5 cm below the gastroesophageal junction, and got into a lesser space. I fired transversely across the stomach with a 45 blue load stapler. I then used two fires of the 60 blue load with SeamGuard to go up into my angle of His, thereby creating my gastric pouch. I then made a hole at the base of the gastric pouch and had Anesthesia remove the bougie and place the OG tube connected to the anvil. I pulled the anvil into place, and I then opened up my 15-mm port site and passed my EEA stapler. I passed that in the end of my Roux limb and had the spike come out antimesenteric. I joined the spike with the anvil and fired a stapler creating an end-to-side anastomosis, then divided across the redundant portion of my Roux limb with a white load GI stapler, and removed it with an Endocatch bag. I put some additional 2-0 Vicryl sutures in the anastomosis for further security. I then placed a bowel clamp across the bowel. I went above and passed an EGD scope into the mouth down to the esophagus and into the gastric pouch. I distended gastric pouch with air. There was no air leak seen. I could pass the scope easily through the anastomosis. There was no bleeding seen through the scope. We closed the 15-mm port site with interrupted 0 Vicryl suture utilizing Carter-Thomason. I copiously irrigated out that incision with about 2 L of saline. I then closed the skin of all incisions with running Monocryl. Sponge, instrument, and needle counts were correct at the end of the case. The patient tolerated the procedure well without any complications. ### Response: Gastroenterology, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Morton's neuroma, third interspace, left foot.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Morton's neuroma, third interspace, left foot.,OPERATION PERFORMED: , Excision of neuroma, third interspace, left foot.,ANESTHESIA: , General (local was confirmed by surgeon).,HEMOSTASIS: , Ankle pneumatic tourniquet 225 mmHg.,TOURNIQUET TIME: , 18 minutes. Electrocautery was necessary.,INJECTABLES: , 50:50 mixture of 0.5% Marcaine and 1% Xylocaine, both plain. Also, 0.5 mL dexamethasone phosphate (4 mg/mL).,INDICATIONS: , Please see dictated H&P for specifics.,PROCEDURE: ,After proper identification was made, the patient was brought to the operating room and placed on the table in supine position. The patient was then placed under general anesthesia. A local block was then injected into the third ray of the left foot. The left foot was then prepped with chlorhexidine gluconate and then draped in the usual sterile technique. The left foot was then exsanguinated with an Esmarch bandage and elevated and an ankle pneumatic tourniquet was then inflated. Attention was then directed to the third interspace where a longitudinal incision was placed just proximal to the webspace. The incision was deepened via sharp and blunt dissection with care taken to protect all vital structures. Identification of the neuroma was made following plantar flexion of the digits. It was grasped with a hemostat and it was dissected in toto and removed. It was then sent to pathology. The area was then flushed with copious amounts of sterile saline. Closure was with 4-0 Vicryl in the subcutaneous tissue and then running subcuticular 4-0 nylon suture in the skin. Steri-Strips were then placed over that area. A sterile compressive dressing consisting of saline-soaked gauze, ABD, Kling, Coban was placed over the foot. The tourniquet was then released. Good flow was noted to return to all digits. The patient did tolerate the procedure well. He left the operating room with all vital signs stable and neurovascular status intact. The patient went to the recovery. The patient previously had been given both oral and written preoperative as well as postoperative instructions and a prescription for pain. The patient will follow up with me in approximately 4 days for dressing change.

preoperative diagnosis mortons neuroma third interspace left footpostoperative diagnosis mortons neuroma third interspace left footoperation performed excision neuroma third interspace left footanesthesia general local confirmed surgeonhemostasis ankle pneumatic tourniquet mmhgtourniquet time minutes electrocautery necessaryinjectables mixture marcaine xylocaine plain also ml dexamethasone phosphate mgmlindications please see dictated hp specificsprocedure proper identification made patient brought operating room placed table supine position patient placed general anesthesia local block injected third ray left foot left foot prepped chlorhexidine gluconate draped usual sterile technique left foot exsanguinated esmarch bandage elevated ankle pneumatic tourniquet inflated attention directed third interspace longitudinal incision placed proximal webspace incision deepened via sharp blunt dissection care taken protect vital structures identification neuroma made following plantar flexion digits grasped hemostat dissected toto removed sent pathology area flushed copious amounts sterile saline closure vicryl subcutaneous tissue running subcuticular nylon suture skin steristrips placed area sterile compressive dressing consisting salinesoaked gauze abd kling coban placed foot tourniquet released good flow noted return digits patient tolerate procedure well left operating room vital signs stable neurovascular status intact patient went recovery patient previously given oral written preoperative well postoperative instructions prescription pain patient follow approximately days dressing change

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Morton's neuroma, third interspace, left foot.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Morton's neuroma, third interspace, left foot.,OPERATION PERFORMED: , Excision of neuroma, third interspace, left foot.,ANESTHESIA: , General (local was confirmed by surgeon).,HEMOSTASIS: , Ankle pneumatic tourniquet 225 mmHg.,TOURNIQUET TIME: , 18 minutes. Electrocautery was necessary.,INJECTABLES: , 50:50 mixture of 0.5% Marcaine and 1% Xylocaine, both plain. Also, 0.5 mL dexamethasone phosphate (4 mg/mL).,INDICATIONS: , Please see dictated H&P for specifics.,PROCEDURE: ,After proper identification was made, the patient was brought to the operating room and placed on the table in supine position. The patient was then placed under general anesthesia. A local block was then injected into the third ray of the left foot. The left foot was then prepped with chlorhexidine gluconate and then draped in the usual sterile technique. The left foot was then exsanguinated with an Esmarch bandage and elevated and an ankle pneumatic tourniquet was then inflated. Attention was then directed to the third interspace where a longitudinal incision was placed just proximal to the webspace. The incision was deepened via sharp and blunt dissection with care taken to protect all vital structures. Identification of the neuroma was made following plantar flexion of the digits. It was grasped with a hemostat and it was dissected in toto and removed. It was then sent to pathology. The area was then flushed with copious amounts of sterile saline. Closure was with 4-0 Vicryl in the subcutaneous tissue and then running subcuticular 4-0 nylon suture in the skin. Steri-Strips were then placed over that area. A sterile compressive dressing consisting of saline-soaked gauze, ABD, Kling, Coban was placed over the foot. The tourniquet was then released. Good flow was noted to return to all digits. The patient did tolerate the procedure well. He left the operating room with all vital signs stable and neurovascular status intact. The patient went to the recovery. The patient previously had been given both oral and written preoperative as well as postoperative instructions and a prescription for pain. The patient will follow up with me in approximately 4 days for dressing change. ### Response: Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Multiple pelvic adhesions.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Multiple pelvic adhesions.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED: ,Lysis of pelvic adhesions.,ANESTHESIA: , General with local.,SPECIMEN: , None.,COMPLICATIONS: , None.,HISTORY: , The patient is a 32-year-old female who had an 8 cm left ovarian mass, which was evaluated by Dr. X. She had a ultrasound, which demonstrated the same. The mass was palpable on physical examination and was tender. She was scheduled for an elective pelvic laparotomy with left salpingooophorectomy. During the surgery, there were multiple pelvic adhesions between the left ovarian cyst and the sigmoid colon. These adhesions were taken down sharply with Metzenbaum scissors.,PROCEDURE: , A pelvic laparotomy had been performed by Dr. X. Upon exploration of the abdomen, multiple pelvic adhesions were noted as previously stated. A 6 cm left ovarian cyst was noted with adhesions to the sigmoid colon and mesentery. These adhesions were taken down sharply with Metzenbaum scissors until the sigmoid colon was completely freed from the ovarian cyst. The ureter had been identified and isolated prior to the adhesiolysis. There was no evidence of bleeding. The remainder of the case was performed by Dr. X and this will be found in a separate operative report.

preoperative diagnosis multiple pelvic adhesionspostoperative diagnosis multiple pelvic adhesionsprocedure performed lysis pelvic adhesionsanesthesia general localspecimen nonecomplications nonehistory patient yearold female cm left ovarian mass evaluated dr x ultrasound demonstrated mass palpable physical examination tender scheduled elective pelvic laparotomy left salpingooophorectomy surgery multiple pelvic adhesions left ovarian cyst sigmoid colon adhesions taken sharply metzenbaum scissorsprocedure pelvic laparotomy performed dr x upon exploration abdomen multiple pelvic adhesions noted previously stated cm left ovarian cyst noted adhesions sigmoid colon mesentery adhesions taken sharply metzenbaum scissors sigmoid colon completely freed ovarian cyst ureter identified isolated prior adhesiolysis evidence bleeding remainder case performed dr x found separate operative report

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Multiple pelvic adhesions.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Multiple pelvic adhesions.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED: ,Lysis of pelvic adhesions.,ANESTHESIA: , General with local.,SPECIMEN: , None.,COMPLICATIONS: , None.,HISTORY: , The patient is a 32-year-old female who had an 8 cm left ovarian mass, which was evaluated by Dr. X. She had a ultrasound, which demonstrated the same. The mass was palpable on physical examination and was tender. She was scheduled for an elective pelvic laparotomy with left salpingooophorectomy. During the surgery, there were multiple pelvic adhesions between the left ovarian cyst and the sigmoid colon. These adhesions were taken down sharply with Metzenbaum scissors.,PROCEDURE: , A pelvic laparotomy had been performed by Dr. X. Upon exploration of the abdomen, multiple pelvic adhesions were noted as previously stated. A 6 cm left ovarian cyst was noted with adhesions to the sigmoid colon and mesentery. These adhesions were taken down sharply with Metzenbaum scissors until the sigmoid colon was completely freed from the ovarian cyst. The ureter had been identified and isolated prior to the adhesiolysis. There was no evidence of bleeding. The remainder of the case was performed by Dr. X and this will be found in a separate operative report. ### Response: Obstetrics / Gynecology, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Nasal deformity, status post rhinoplasty.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Same.,PROCEDURE:, Revision rhinoplasty (CPT 30450). Left conchal cartilage harvest (CPT 21235).,ANESTHESIA: , General.,INDICATIONS FOR THE PROCEDURE: , This patient is an otherwise healthy male who had a previous nasal fracture. During his healing, perioperatively he did sustain a hockey puck to the nose resulting in a saddle-nose deformity with septal hematoma. The patient healed status post rhinoplasty as a result but was left with a persistent saddle-nose dorsal defect. The patient was consented for the above-stated procedure. The risks, benefits, and alternatives were discussed.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: ,The patient was prepped and draped in the usual sterile fashion. The patient did have approximately 12 mL of Lidocaine with epinephrine 1% with 1:100,000 infiltrated into the nasal soft tissues. In addition to this, cocaine pledgets were placed to assist with hemostasis.,At this point, attention was turned to the left ear. Approximately 3 mL of 1% Lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine was infiltrated into the subcutaneous tissues of the conchal bulb. Betadine was utilized for preparation. A 15 blade was used to incise along the posterior conchal area and a Freer elevator was utilized to lift the soft tissues off the conchal cartilage in a submucoperichondrial plane. I then completed this along the posterior aspect of the conchal cartilage, was transected in the concha cavum and concha cymba, both were harvested. These were placed aside in saline. Hemostasis was obtained with bipolar electrocauterization. Bovie electrocauterization was also employed as needed. The entire length of the wound was then closed with 5-0 plain running locking suture. The patient then had a Telfa placed both anterior and posterior to the conchal defect and placed in a sandwich dressing utilizing a 2-0 Prolene suture. Antibiotic ointment was applied generously.,Next, attention was turned to opening and lifting the soft tissues of the nose. A typical external columella inverted V gull-wing incision was placed on the columella and trailed into a marginal incision. The soft tissues of the nose were then elevated using curved sharp scissors and Metzenbaums. Soft tissues were elevated over the lower lateral cartilages, upper lateral cartilages onto the nasal dorsum. At this point, attention was turned to osteotomies and examination of the external cartilages.,The patient did have very broad lower lateral cartilages leading to a bulbous tip. The lower lateral cartilages were trimmed in a symmetrical fashion leaving at least 8 mm of lower lateral cartilage bilaterally along the lateral aspect. Having completed this, the patient had medial and lateral osteotomies performed with a 2-mm osteotome. These were done transmucosally after elevating the tract using a Cottle elevator. Direct hemostasis pressure was applied to assist with bruising.,Next, attention was turned to tip mechanisms. The patient had a series of double-dome sutures placed into the nasal tip. Then, 5-0 Dexon was employed for intradomal suturing, 5-0 clear Prolene was used for interdomal suturing. Having completed this, a 5-0 clear Prolene alar spanning suture was employed to narrow the superior tip area.,Next, attention was turned to dorsal augmentation. A Gore-Tex small implant had been selected, previously incised. This was taken to the back table and carved under sterile conditions. The patient then had the implant placed into the super-tip area to assist with support of the nasal dorsum. It was placed into a precise pocket and remained in the midline.,Next, attention was turned to performing a columella strut. The cartilage from the concha was shaped into a strut and placed into a precision pocket between the medial footplate of the lower lateral cartilage. This was fixed into position utilizing a 5-0 Dexon suture.,Having completed placement of all augmentation grafts, the patient was examined for hemostasis. The external columella inverted gull-wing incision along the nasal tip was closed with a series of interrupted everting 6-0 black nylon sutures. The entire marginal incisions for cosmetic rhinoplasty were closed utilizing a series of 5-0 plain interrupted sutures.,At the termination of the case, the ear was inspected and the position of the conchal cartilage harvest was hemostatic. There was no evidence of hematoma, and the patient had a series of brown Steri-Strips and Aquaplast cast placed over the nasal dorsum. The inner nasal area was then examined at the termination of the case and it seemed to be hemostatic as well.,The patient was transferred to the PACU in stable condition. He was charged to home on antibiotics to prevent infection both from the left ear conchal cartilage harvest and also the Gore-Tex implant area. He was asked to follow up in 4 days for removal of the bolster overlying the conchal cartilage harvest.

preoperative diagnosis nasal deformity status post rhinoplastypostoperative diagnosis sameprocedure revision rhinoplasty cpt left conchal cartilage harvest cpt anesthesia generalindications procedure patient otherwise healthy male previous nasal fracture healing perioperatively sustain hockey puck nose resulting saddlenose deformity septal hematoma patient healed status post rhinoplasty result left persistent saddlenose dorsal defect patient consented abovestated procedure risks benefits alternatives discusseddescription procedure patient prepped draped usual sterile fashion patient approximately ml lidocaine epinephrine infiltrated nasal soft tissues addition cocaine pledgets placed assist hemostasisat point attention turned left ear approximately ml lidocaine epinephrine infiltrated subcutaneous tissues conchal bulb betadine utilized preparation blade used incise along posterior conchal area freer elevator utilized lift soft tissues conchal cartilage submucoperichondrial plane completed along posterior aspect conchal cartilage transected concha cavum concha cymba harvested placed aside saline hemostasis obtained bipolar electrocauterization bovie electrocauterization also employed needed entire length wound closed plain running locking suture patient telfa placed anterior posterior conchal defect placed sandwich dressing utilizing prolene suture antibiotic ointment applied generouslynext attention turned opening lifting soft tissues nose typical external columella inverted v gullwing incision placed columella trailed marginal incision soft tissues nose elevated using curved sharp scissors metzenbaums soft tissues elevated lower lateral cartilages upper lateral cartilages onto nasal dorsum point attention turned osteotomies examination external cartilagesthe patient broad lower lateral cartilages leading bulbous tip lower lateral cartilages trimmed symmetrical fashion leaving least mm lower lateral cartilage bilaterally along lateral aspect completed patient medial lateral osteotomies performed mm osteotome done transmucosally elevating tract using cottle elevator direct hemostasis pressure applied assist bruisingnext attention turned tip mechanisms patient series doubledome sutures placed nasal tip dexon employed intradomal suturing clear prolene used interdomal suturing completed clear prolene alar spanning suture employed narrow superior tip areanext attention turned dorsal augmentation goretex small implant selected previously incised taken back table carved sterile conditions patient implant placed supertip area assist support nasal dorsum placed precise pocket remained midlinenext attention turned performing columella strut cartilage concha shaped strut placed precision pocket medial footplate lower lateral cartilage fixed position utilizing dexon suturehaving completed placement augmentation grafts patient examined hemostasis external columella inverted gullwing incision along nasal tip closed series interrupted everting black nylon sutures entire marginal incisions cosmetic rhinoplasty closed utilizing series plain interrupted suturesat termination case ear inspected position conchal cartilage harvest hemostatic evidence hematoma patient series brown steristrips aquaplast cast placed nasal dorsum inner nasal area examined termination case seemed hemostatic wellthe patient transferred pacu stable condition charged home antibiotics prevent infection left ear conchal cartilage harvest also goretex implant area asked follow days removal bolster overlying conchal cartilage harvest

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Nasal deformity, status post rhinoplasty.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Same.,PROCEDURE:, Revision rhinoplasty (CPT 30450). Left conchal cartilage harvest (CPT 21235).,ANESTHESIA: , General.,INDICATIONS FOR THE PROCEDURE: , This patient is an otherwise healthy male who had a previous nasal fracture. During his healing, perioperatively he did sustain a hockey puck to the nose resulting in a saddle-nose deformity with septal hematoma. The patient healed status post rhinoplasty as a result but was left with a persistent saddle-nose dorsal defect. The patient was consented for the above-stated procedure. The risks, benefits, and alternatives were discussed.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: ,The patient was prepped and draped in the usual sterile fashion. The patient did have approximately 12 mL of Lidocaine with epinephrine 1% with 1:100,000 infiltrated into the nasal soft tissues. In addition to this, cocaine pledgets were placed to assist with hemostasis.,At this point, attention was turned to the left ear. Approximately 3 mL of 1% Lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine was infiltrated into the subcutaneous tissues of the conchal bulb. Betadine was utilized for preparation. A 15 blade was used to incise along the posterior conchal area and a Freer elevator was utilized to lift the soft tissues off the conchal cartilage in a submucoperichondrial plane. I then completed this along the posterior aspect of the conchal cartilage, was transected in the concha cavum and concha cymba, both were harvested. These were placed aside in saline. Hemostasis was obtained with bipolar electrocauterization. Bovie electrocauterization was also employed as needed. The entire length of the wound was then closed with 5-0 plain running locking suture. The patient then had a Telfa placed both anterior and posterior to the conchal defect and placed in a sandwich dressing utilizing a 2-0 Prolene suture. Antibiotic ointment was applied generously.,Next, attention was turned to opening and lifting the soft tissues of the nose. A typical external columella inverted V gull-wing incision was placed on the columella and trailed into a marginal incision. The soft tissues of the nose were then elevated using curved sharp scissors and Metzenbaums. Soft tissues were elevated over the lower lateral cartilages, upper lateral cartilages onto the nasal dorsum. At this point, attention was turned to osteotomies and examination of the external cartilages.,The patient did have very broad lower lateral cartilages leading to a bulbous tip. The lower lateral cartilages were trimmed in a symmetrical fashion leaving at least 8 mm of lower lateral cartilage bilaterally along the lateral aspect. Having completed this, the patient had medial and lateral osteotomies performed with a 2-mm osteotome. These were done transmucosally after elevating the tract using a Cottle elevator. Direct hemostasis pressure was applied to assist with bruising.,Next, attention was turned to tip mechanisms. The patient had a series of double-dome sutures placed into the nasal tip. Then, 5-0 Dexon was employed for intradomal suturing, 5-0 clear Prolene was used for interdomal suturing. Having completed this, a 5-0 clear Prolene alar spanning suture was employed to narrow the superior tip area.,Next, attention was turned to dorsal augmentation. A Gore-Tex small implant had been selected, previously incised. This was taken to the back table and carved under sterile conditions. The patient then had the implant placed into the super-tip area to assist with support of the nasal dorsum. It was placed into a precise pocket and remained in the midline.,Next, attention was turned to performing a columella strut. The cartilage from the concha was shaped into a strut and placed into a precision pocket between the medial footplate of the lower lateral cartilage. This was fixed into position utilizing a 5-0 Dexon suture.,Having completed placement of all augmentation grafts, the patient was examined for hemostasis. The external columella inverted gull-wing incision along the nasal tip was closed with a series of interrupted everting 6-0 black nylon sutures. The entire marginal incisions for cosmetic rhinoplasty were closed utilizing a series of 5-0 plain interrupted sutures.,At the termination of the case, the ear was inspected and the position of the conchal cartilage harvest was hemostatic. There was no evidence of hematoma, and the patient had a series of brown Steri-Strips and Aquaplast cast placed over the nasal dorsum. The inner nasal area was then examined at the termination of the case and it seemed to be hemostatic as well.,The patient was transferred to the PACU in stable condition. He was charged to home on antibiotics to prevent infection both from the left ear conchal cartilage harvest and also the Gore-Tex implant area. He was asked to follow up in 4 days for removal of the bolster overlying the conchal cartilage harvest. ### Response: ENT - Otolaryngology, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Nausea and vomiting and upper abdominal pain.,POST PROCEDURE DIAGNOSIS: ,Normal upper endoscopy.,OPERATION: , Esophagogastroduodenoscopy with antral biopsies for H. pylori x2 with biopsy forceps.,ANESTHESIA:, IV sedation 50 mg Demerol, 8 mg of Versed.,PROCEDURE: , The patient was taken to the endoscopy suite. After adequate IV sedation with the above medications, hurricane was sprayed in the mouth as well as in the esophagus. A bite block was placed and the gastroscope placed into the mouth and was passed into the esophagus and negotiated through the esophagus, stomach, and pylorus. The first, second, and third portions of the duodenum were normal. The scope was withdrawn into the antrum which was normal and two bites with the biopsy forceps were taken in separate spots for H. pylori. The scope was retroflexed which showed a normal GE junction from the inside of the stomach and no evidence of pathology or paraesophageal hernia. The scope was withdrawn at the GE junction which was in a normal position with a normal transition zone. The scope was then removed throughout the esophagus which was normal. The patient tolerated the procedure well.,The plan is to obtain a HIDA scan as the right upper quadrant ultrasound appeared to be normal, although previous ultrasounds several years ago showed a gallstone.

preoperative diagnosis nausea vomiting upper abdominal painpost procedure diagnosis normal upper endoscopyoperation esophagogastroduodenoscopy antral biopsies h pylori x biopsy forcepsanesthesia iv sedation mg demerol mg versedprocedure patient taken endoscopy suite adequate iv sedation medications hurricane sprayed mouth well esophagus bite block placed gastroscope placed mouth passed esophagus negotiated esophagus stomach pylorus first second third portions duodenum normal scope withdrawn antrum normal two bites biopsy forceps taken separate spots h pylori scope retroflexed showed normal ge junction inside stomach evidence pathology paraesophageal hernia scope withdrawn ge junction normal position normal transition zone scope removed throughout esophagus normal patient tolerated procedure wellthe plan obtain hida scan right upper quadrant ultrasound appeared normal although previous ultrasounds several years ago showed gallstone

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Nausea and vomiting and upper abdominal pain.,POST PROCEDURE DIAGNOSIS: ,Normal upper endoscopy.,OPERATION: , Esophagogastroduodenoscopy with antral biopsies for H. pylori x2 with biopsy forceps.,ANESTHESIA:, IV sedation 50 mg Demerol, 8 mg of Versed.,PROCEDURE: , The patient was taken to the endoscopy suite. After adequate IV sedation with the above medications, hurricane was sprayed in the mouth as well as in the esophagus. A bite block was placed and the gastroscope placed into the mouth and was passed into the esophagus and negotiated through the esophagus, stomach, and pylorus. The first, second, and third portions of the duodenum were normal. The scope was withdrawn into the antrum which was normal and two bites with the biopsy forceps were taken in separate spots for H. pylori. The scope was retroflexed which showed a normal GE junction from the inside of the stomach and no evidence of pathology or paraesophageal hernia. The scope was withdrawn at the GE junction which was in a normal position with a normal transition zone. The scope was then removed throughout the esophagus which was normal. The patient tolerated the procedure well.,The plan is to obtain a HIDA scan as the right upper quadrant ultrasound appeared to be normal, although previous ultrasounds several years ago showed a gallstone. ### Response: Gastroenterology, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Necrotizing infection of the left lower abdomen and left peritoneal area.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Necrotizing infection of the left lower abdomen and left peritoneal area.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED:, Debridement of the necrotic tissue of the left lower abdomen as well as the left peritoneal area.,ANESTHESIA:, General.,FLUIDS:, 800 cc given.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS: ,350 cc.,SPECIMEN,: Pannus and left peritoneal specimen sent to Pathology.,REASON FOR PROCEDURE:, This is a 53-year-old white male who presented to ABCD General Hospital on 09/05/03 with a chief complaint of drainage from his left groin. The patient is a diabetic who requires insulin, but has been noncompliant and states that his blood sugars have been out of control. He has had a groin abdominal wound drained for about four days. The patient states that there has been pus that has saturated his sheath. He has had a possible fever at home that he did not chart with a thermometer. He has had the same groin infection twice in the past with tunneling lesions. The patient states that his wife noted there was a round scar on his abdomen and that was black and had crept up in the last day. Bowel habits and eating were essentially normal.,Urinary habits were normal. The patient is morbidly obese and is approximately 450 lb. He has not been following a diabetic diet or using insulin secondary to lack of funds to put his medications.,PAST MEDICAL HISTORY:, Diabetes, morbid obesity, and nephrolithiasis.,PAST SURGICAL HISTORY:, Appendectomy and stone extraction.,PROCEDURE: , The patient was examined in the Emergency Room by Dr. X and was found to have multiple areas of erythematous tissue, which could potentially be consistent with a necrotizing fascitis texture. The patient had a white count of 11.4 and a hemoglobin of 13.4. Please note that the patient is a Jehovah's Witness and has adamantly refused receiving any blood products. The risks and benefits of such were discussed with the patient at length prior to surgery and he was permitted to make sure not to receive blood and his wishes will be granted. In the operative suite, he was prepped and draped in the usual sterile fashion. The patient was placed in a lithotomy position to visualize the peritoneum as well as the abdomen. Copious amounts of Betadine solution were used to cleanse the area and the wound was visualized. Approximately, 10 cm x 5 cm elliptical incision was made on the lower left quadrant of the abdomen surrounding the area of necrosis. Necrotic tissue comprised approximately 2 cm x 2 cm area and was indurated. The abdomen appeared to have a large erythematous border, however, the true indurated tissue was approximately the size of a deck of cards. The area was incised using a #10 blade scalpel and then Bovie cauterization was used to achieve good hemostasis. The tissue was removed using an Allis forceps as well as a Bovie to double the incision down to the fascia. The necrotic tissue was lifted out of the abdomen. All bleeding was cauterized using the Bovie. A solution of gentamicin and sterile saline was placed into a high-powered water pump device and the wound was copiously irrigated and suctioned. A wet Kerlix dressing was passed into the wound and it will be left opened with wet-to-dry dressing. The left groin area was also incised using an elliptical incision that was approximately 13 cm x 6 cm. The tissue was incised to the muscle layer of the muscle. There was a pus pocket that was visible with capsule as well and there was an area of the necrotic tissue as well. There was a mild amount of pus that drained from the wound. Cultures were taken from the groin wound and were sent to pathology. The specimen was excised using traction with the Allis clamps as well as Bovie set on coag. Once the tissue was excised from the ________, the area was fully irrigated using the gentamicin sterile saline solution in the high-powered water irrigation unit. After the irrigation, the wound was packed using a wet Kerlix dressing and will be left open to heal.,It was determined at this time that both wounds will be left open to heal with the wet-to-dry dressings in place and we will come back and close the wounds at a later date. The skin excised from the left lower abdominal quadrant as well as the left groin was sent to pathology. The patient tolerated the procedure well and was taken to recovery in good condition.

preoperative diagnosis necrotizing infection left lower abdomen left peritoneal areapostoperative diagnosis necrotizing infection left lower abdomen left peritoneal areaprocedure performed debridement necrotic tissue left lower abdomen well left peritoneal areaanesthesia generalfluids cc givenestimated blood loss ccspecimen pannus left peritoneal specimen sent pathologyreason procedure yearold white male presented abcd general hospital chief complaint drainage left groin patient diabetic requires insulin noncompliant states blood sugars control groin abdominal wound drained four days patient states pus saturated sheath possible fever home chart thermometer groin infection twice past tunneling lesions patient states wife noted round scar abdomen black crept last day bowel habits eating essentially normalurinary habits normal patient morbidly obese approximately lb following diabetic diet using insulin secondary lack funds put medicationspast medical history diabetes morbid obesity nephrolithiasispast surgical history appendectomy stone extractionprocedure patient examined emergency room dr x found multiple areas erythematous tissue could potentially consistent necrotizing fascitis texture patient white count hemoglobin please note patient jehovahs witness adamantly refused receiving blood products risks benefits discussed patient length prior surgery permitted make sure receive blood wishes granted operative suite prepped draped usual sterile fashion patient placed lithotomy position visualize peritoneum well abdomen copious amounts betadine solution used cleanse area wound visualized approximately cm x cm elliptical incision made lower left quadrant abdomen surrounding area necrosis necrotic tissue comprised approximately cm x cm area indurated abdomen appeared large erythematous border however true indurated tissue approximately size deck cards area incised using blade scalpel bovie cauterization used achieve good hemostasis tissue removed using allis forceps well bovie double incision fascia necrotic tissue lifted abdomen bleeding cauterized using bovie solution gentamicin sterile saline placed highpowered water pump device wound copiously irrigated suctioned wet kerlix dressing passed wound left opened wettodry dressing left groin area also incised using elliptical incision approximately cm x cm tissue incised muscle layer muscle pus pocket visible capsule well area necrotic tissue well mild amount pus drained wound cultures taken groin wound sent pathology specimen excised using traction allis clamps well bovie set coag tissue excised ________ area fully irrigated using gentamicin sterile saline solution highpowered water irrigation unit irrigation wound packed using wet kerlix dressing left open healit determined time wounds left open heal wettodry dressings place come back close wounds later date skin excised left lower abdominal quadrant well left groin sent pathology patient tolerated procedure well taken recovery good condition

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Necrotizing infection of the left lower abdomen and left peritoneal area.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Necrotizing infection of the left lower abdomen and left peritoneal area.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED:, Debridement of the necrotic tissue of the left lower abdomen as well as the left peritoneal area.,ANESTHESIA:, General.,FLUIDS:, 800 cc given.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS: ,350 cc.,SPECIMEN,: Pannus and left peritoneal specimen sent to Pathology.,REASON FOR PROCEDURE:, This is a 53-year-old white male who presented to ABCD General Hospital on 09/05/03 with a chief complaint of drainage from his left groin. The patient is a diabetic who requires insulin, but has been noncompliant and states that his blood sugars have been out of control. He has had a groin abdominal wound drained for about four days. The patient states that there has been pus that has saturated his sheath. He has had a possible fever at home that he did not chart with a thermometer. He has had the same groin infection twice in the past with tunneling lesions. The patient states that his wife noted there was a round scar on his abdomen and that was black and had crept up in the last day. Bowel habits and eating were essentially normal.,Urinary habits were normal. The patient is morbidly obese and is approximately 450 lb. He has not been following a diabetic diet or using insulin secondary to lack of funds to put his medications.,PAST MEDICAL HISTORY:, Diabetes, morbid obesity, and nephrolithiasis.,PAST SURGICAL HISTORY:, Appendectomy and stone extraction.,PROCEDURE: , The patient was examined in the Emergency Room by Dr. X and was found to have multiple areas of erythematous tissue, which could potentially be consistent with a necrotizing fascitis texture. The patient had a white count of 11.4 and a hemoglobin of 13.4. Please note that the patient is a Jehovah's Witness and has adamantly refused receiving any blood products. The risks and benefits of such were discussed with the patient at length prior to surgery and he was permitted to make sure not to receive blood and his wishes will be granted. In the operative suite, he was prepped and draped in the usual sterile fashion. The patient was placed in a lithotomy position to visualize the peritoneum as well as the abdomen. Copious amounts of Betadine solution were used to cleanse the area and the wound was visualized. Approximately, 10 cm x 5 cm elliptical incision was made on the lower left quadrant of the abdomen surrounding the area of necrosis. Necrotic tissue comprised approximately 2 cm x 2 cm area and was indurated. The abdomen appeared to have a large erythematous border, however, the true indurated tissue was approximately the size of a deck of cards. The area was incised using a #10 blade scalpel and then Bovie cauterization was used to achieve good hemostasis. The tissue was removed using an Allis forceps as well as a Bovie to double the incision down to the fascia. The necrotic tissue was lifted out of the abdomen. All bleeding was cauterized using the Bovie. A solution of gentamicin and sterile saline was placed into a high-powered water pump device and the wound was copiously irrigated and suctioned. A wet Kerlix dressing was passed into the wound and it will be left opened with wet-to-dry dressing. The left groin area was also incised using an elliptical incision that was approximately 13 cm x 6 cm. The tissue was incised to the muscle layer of the muscle. There was a pus pocket that was visible with capsule as well and there was an area of the necrotic tissue as well. There was a mild amount of pus that drained from the wound. Cultures were taken from the groin wound and were sent to pathology. The specimen was excised using traction with the Allis clamps as well as Bovie set on coag. Once the tissue was excised from the ________, the area was fully irrigated using the gentamicin sterile saline solution in the high-powered water irrigation unit. After the irrigation, the wound was packed using a wet Kerlix dressing and will be left open to heal.,It was determined at this time that both wounds will be left open to heal with the wet-to-dry dressings in place and we will come back and close the wounds at a later date. The skin excised from the left lower abdominal quadrant as well as the left groin was sent to pathology. The patient tolerated the procedure well and was taken to recovery in good condition. ### Response: Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Need for intravenous access.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Need for intravenous access.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED: ,Insertion of a right femoral triple lumen catheter.,ANESTHESIA: , Includes 4 cc of 1% lidocaine locally.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS: , Minimum.,INDICATIONS:, The patient is an 86-year-old Caucasian female who presented to ABCD General Hospital secondary to drainage of an old percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy site. The patient is also ventilator-dependent, respiratory failure with tracheostomy in place and dependent on parenteral nutrition secondary to dysphagia and also has history of protein-calorie malnutrition and the patient needs to receive total parenteral nutrition and therefore needs central venous access.,PROCEDURE:, The patient's legal guardian was talked to. All questions were answered and consent was obtained. The patient was sterilely prepped and draped. Approximately 4 cc of 1% lidocaine was injected into the inguinal site. A strong femoral artery pulse was felt and triple lumen catheter Angiocath was inserted at 30-degree angle cephalad and aspirated until a dark venous blood was aspirated. A guidewire was then placed through the needle. The needle was then removed. The skin was ________ at the base of the wire and a dilator was placed over the wire. The triple lumen catheters were then flushed with bacteriostatic saline. The dilator was then removed from the guidewire and a triple lumen catheter was then inserted over the guidewire with the guidewire held at all times.,The wire was then carefully removed. Each port of the lumen catheter was aspirated with 10 cc syringe with normal saline till dark red blood was expressed and then flushed with bacteriostatic normal saline and repeated on the remaining two ports. Each port was closed off and also kept off. Straight needle suture was then used to suture the triple lumen catheter down to the skin. Peristatic agent was then placed at the site of the lumen catheter insertion and a Tegaderm was then placed over the site. The surgical site was then sterilely cleaned. The patient tolerated the full procedure well. There were no complications. The nurse was then contacted to allow for access of the triple lumen catheter.

preoperative diagnosis need intravenous accesspostoperative diagnosis need intravenous accessprocedure performed insertion right femoral triple lumen catheteranesthesia includes cc lidocaine locallyestimated blood loss minimumindications patient yearold caucasian female presented abcd general hospital secondary drainage old percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy site patient also ventilatordependent respiratory failure tracheostomy place dependent parenteral nutrition secondary dysphagia also history proteincalorie malnutrition patient needs receive total parenteral nutrition therefore needs central venous accessprocedure patients legal guardian talked questions answered consent obtained patient sterilely prepped draped approximately cc lidocaine injected inguinal site strong femoral artery pulse felt triple lumen catheter angiocath inserted degree angle cephalad aspirated dark venous blood aspirated guidewire placed needle needle removed skin ________ base wire dilator placed wire triple lumen catheters flushed bacteriostatic saline dilator removed guidewire triple lumen catheter inserted guidewire guidewire held timesthe wire carefully removed port lumen catheter aspirated cc syringe normal saline till dark red blood expressed flushed bacteriostatic normal saline repeated remaining two ports port closed also kept straight needle suture used suture triple lumen catheter skin peristatic agent placed site lumen catheter insertion tegaderm placed site surgical site sterilely cleaned patient tolerated full procedure well complications nurse contacted allow access triple lumen catheter

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Need for intravenous access.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Need for intravenous access.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED: ,Insertion of a right femoral triple lumen catheter.,ANESTHESIA: , Includes 4 cc of 1% lidocaine locally.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS: , Minimum.,INDICATIONS:, The patient is an 86-year-old Caucasian female who presented to ABCD General Hospital secondary to drainage of an old percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy site. The patient is also ventilator-dependent, respiratory failure with tracheostomy in place and dependent on parenteral nutrition secondary to dysphagia and also has history of protein-calorie malnutrition and the patient needs to receive total parenteral nutrition and therefore needs central venous access.,PROCEDURE:, The patient's legal guardian was talked to. All questions were answered and consent was obtained. The patient was sterilely prepped and draped. Approximately 4 cc of 1% lidocaine was injected into the inguinal site. A strong femoral artery pulse was felt and triple lumen catheter Angiocath was inserted at 30-degree angle cephalad and aspirated until a dark venous blood was aspirated. A guidewire was then placed through the needle. The needle was then removed. The skin was ________ at the base of the wire and a dilator was placed over the wire. The triple lumen catheters were then flushed with bacteriostatic saline. The dilator was then removed from the guidewire and a triple lumen catheter was then inserted over the guidewire with the guidewire held at all times.,The wire was then carefully removed. Each port of the lumen catheter was aspirated with 10 cc syringe with normal saline till dark red blood was expressed and then flushed with bacteriostatic normal saline and repeated on the remaining two ports. Each port was closed off and also kept off. Straight needle suture was then used to suture the triple lumen catheter down to the skin. Peristatic agent was then placed at the site of the lumen catheter insertion and a Tegaderm was then placed over the site. The surgical site was then sterilely cleaned. The patient tolerated the full procedure well. There were no complications. The nurse was then contacted to allow for access of the triple lumen catheter. ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Nonpalpable neoplasm, right breast.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Deferred for Pathology.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED: ,Needle localized wide excision of nonpalpable neoplasm, right breast.,SPECIMEN: , Mammography.,GROSS FINDINGS: ,This 53-year-old Caucasian female who had a nonpalpable neoplasm detected by mammography in the right breast. After excision of neoplasm, there was a separate 1 x 2 cm nodule palpated within the cavity. This too was excised.,OPERATIVE PROCEDURE: ,The patient was taken to the operating room, placed in supine position in the operating table. Intravenous sedation was administered by the Anesthesia Department. The Kopans wire was trimmed to an appropriate length. The patient was sterilely prepped and draped in the usual manner. Local anesthetic consisting of 1% lidocaine and 0.5% Marcaine was injected into the proposed line of incision. A curvilinear circumareolar incision was then made with a #15 scalpel blade close to the wire. The wire was stabilized and brought to protrude through the incision. Skin flaps were then generated with electrocautery. A generous core tissue was grasped with Allis forceps and excised with electrocautery. Prior to complete excision, the superior margin was marked with a #2-0 Vicryl suture, which was tied and cut short. The lateral margin was marked with a #2-0 Vicryl suture, which was tied and cut along. The posterior margin was marked with a #2-0 Polydek suture, which was tied and cut.,The specimen was then completely excised and sent off the operative field as specimen where specimen mammography confirmed the excision of the mammographically detected neoplasm. On palpation of the cavity, there was felt to be a second nodule further medial and this was grasped with an Allis forceps and excised with electrocautery and sent off the field as a separate specimen. Hemostasis was obtained with electrocautery. Good hemostasis was obtained. The incision was closed in two layers. The first layer consisting of a subcuticular inverted interrupted sutures of #4-0 undyed Vicryl. The second layer consisted of Steri-Strips on the epidermis. A pressure dressing of fluff, 4x4s, ABDs, and Elastic bandage was applied. The patient tolerated the surgery well.

preoperative diagnosis nonpalpable neoplasm right breastpostoperative diagnosis deferred pathologyprocedure performed needle localized wide excision nonpalpable neoplasm right breastspecimen mammographygross findings yearold caucasian female nonpalpable neoplasm detected mammography right breast excision neoplasm separate x cm nodule palpated within cavity excisedoperative procedure patient taken operating room placed supine position operating table intravenous sedation administered anesthesia department kopans wire trimmed appropriate length patient sterilely prepped draped usual manner local anesthetic consisting lidocaine marcaine injected proposed line incision curvilinear circumareolar incision made scalpel blade close wire wire stabilized brought protrude incision skin flaps generated electrocautery generous core tissue grasped allis forceps excised electrocautery prior complete excision superior margin marked vicryl suture tied cut short lateral margin marked vicryl suture tied cut along posterior margin marked polydek suture tied cutthe specimen completely excised sent operative field specimen specimen mammography confirmed excision mammographically detected neoplasm palpation cavity felt second nodule medial grasped allis forceps excised electrocautery sent field separate specimen hemostasis obtained electrocautery good hemostasis obtained incision closed two layers first layer consisting subcuticular inverted interrupted sutures undyed vicryl second layer consisted steristrips epidermis pressure dressing fluff xs abds elastic bandage applied patient tolerated surgery well

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Nonpalpable neoplasm, right breast.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Deferred for Pathology.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED: ,Needle localized wide excision of nonpalpable neoplasm, right breast.,SPECIMEN: , Mammography.,GROSS FINDINGS: ,This 53-year-old Caucasian female who had a nonpalpable neoplasm detected by mammography in the right breast. After excision of neoplasm, there was a separate 1 x 2 cm nodule palpated within the cavity. This too was excised.,OPERATIVE PROCEDURE: ,The patient was taken to the operating room, placed in supine position in the operating table. Intravenous sedation was administered by the Anesthesia Department. The Kopans wire was trimmed to an appropriate length. The patient was sterilely prepped and draped in the usual manner. Local anesthetic consisting of 1% lidocaine and 0.5% Marcaine was injected into the proposed line of incision. A curvilinear circumareolar incision was then made with a #15 scalpel blade close to the wire. The wire was stabilized and brought to protrude through the incision. Skin flaps were then generated with electrocautery. A generous core tissue was grasped with Allis forceps and excised with electrocautery. Prior to complete excision, the superior margin was marked with a #2-0 Vicryl suture, which was tied and cut short. The lateral margin was marked with a #2-0 Vicryl suture, which was tied and cut along. The posterior margin was marked with a #2-0 Polydek suture, which was tied and cut.,The specimen was then completely excised and sent off the operative field as specimen where specimen mammography confirmed the excision of the mammographically detected neoplasm. On palpation of the cavity, there was felt to be a second nodule further medial and this was grasped with an Allis forceps and excised with electrocautery and sent off the field as a separate specimen. Hemostasis was obtained with electrocautery. Good hemostasis was obtained. The incision was closed in two layers. The first layer consisting of a subcuticular inverted interrupted sutures of #4-0 undyed Vicryl. The second layer consisted of Steri-Strips on the epidermis. A pressure dressing of fluff, 4x4s, ABDs, and Elastic bandage was applied. The patient tolerated the surgery well. ### Response: Hematology - Oncology, Obstetrics / Gynecology, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Osteomyelitis, left hallux.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Osteomyelitis, left hallux.,PROCEDURES PERFORMED: , Resection of infected bone, left hallux, proximal phalanx, and distal phalanx.,ANESTHESIA: , TIVA/Local.,HISTORY:, This 77-year-old male presents to ABCD preoperative holding area after keeping himself NPO since mid night for surgery on his infected left hallux. The patient has a history of chronic osteomyelitis and non-healing ulceration to the left hallux of almost 10 years' duration. He has failed outpatient antibiotic therapy and conservative methods. At this time, he desires to attempt surgical correction. The patient is not interested in a hallux amputation at this time; however, he is consenting to removal of infected bone. He was counseled preoperatively about the strong probability of the hallux being a "floppy tail" after the surgery and accepts the fact. The risks versus benefits of the procedure were discussed with the patient in detail by Dr. X and the consent is available on the chart for review.,PROCEDURE IN DETAIL: ,The patient's wound was debrided with a #15 blade and down to good healthy tissue preoperatively. The wound was on the planar medial, distal and dorsal medial. The wound's bases were fibrous. They did not break the bone at this point. They were each approximately 0.5 cm in diameter. After IV was established by the Department of Anesthesia, the patient was taken to the operating room and placed on the operating table in supine position with safety straps placed across his waist for his protection.,Due to the patient's history of diabetes and marked calcifications on x-ray, a pneumatic ankle tourniquet was not applied. Next, a total of 3 cc of a 1:1 mixture of 0.5% Marcaine plain and 1% lidocaine plain was used to infiltrate the left hallux and perform a digital block. Next, the foot was prepped and draped in the usual aseptic fashion. It was lowered in the operative field and attention was directed to the left hallux after the sterile stockinet was reflected. Next, a #10 blade was used to make a linear incision approximately 3.5 cm in length along the dorsal aspect of the hallux from the base to just proximal to the eponychium. Next, the incision was deepened through the subcutaneous tissue. A heavy amount of bleeding was encountered. Therefore, a Penrose drain was applied at the tourniquet, which failed. Next, an Esmarch bandage was used to exsanguinate the distal toes and forefoot and was left in the forefoot to achieve hemostasis. Any small veins crossing throughout the subcutaneous layer were ligated via electrocautery. Next, the medial and lateral margins of the incision were under marked with a sharp dissection down to the level of the long extension tendon. The long extensor tendon was thickened and overall exhibited signs of hypertrophy. The transverse incision through the long extensor tendon was made with a #15 blade. Immediately upon entering the joint, yellow discolored fluid was drained from the interphalangeal joint. Next, the extensor tendon was peeled dorsally and distally off the bone. Immediately the head of the proximal phalanx was found to be lytic, disease, friable, crumbly, and there were free fragments of the medial aspect of the bone, the head of the proximal phalanx. This bone was removed with a sharp dissection. Next, after adequate exposure was obtained and the collateral ligaments were released off the head of proximal phalanx, a sagittal saw was used to resect the approximately one-half of the proximal phalanx. This was passed off as the infected bone specimen for microbiology and pathology. Next, the base of the distal phalanx was exposed with sharp dissection and a rongeur was used to remove soft crumbly diseased medial and plantar aspect at the base of distal phalanx. Next, there was diseased soft tissue envelope around the bone, which was also resected to good healthy tissue margins. The pulse lavage was used to flush the wound with 1000 cc of gentamicin-impregnated saline. Next, cleaned instruments were used to take a proximal section of proximal phalanx to label a clean margin. This bone was found to be hard and healthy appearing. The wound after irrigation was free of all debris and infected tissue. Therefore anaerobic and aerobic cultures were taken and sent to microbiology. Next, OsteoSet beads, tobramycin-impregnated, were placed. Six beads were placed in the wound. Next, the extensor tendon was re-approximated with #3-0 Vicryl. The subcutaneous layer was closed with #4-0 Vicryl in a simple interrupted technique. Next, the skin was closed with #4-0 nylon in a horizontal mattress technique.,The Esmarch bandage was released and immediate hyperemic flush was noted at the digits. A standard postoperative dressing was applied consisting of 4 x 4s, Betadine-soaked #0-1 silk, Kerlix, Kling, and a loosely applied Ace wrap. The patient tolerated the above anesthesia and procedure without complications. He was transported via a cart to the Postanesthesia Care Unit. His vitals signs were stable and vascular status was intact. He was given a medium postop shoe that was well-formed and fitting. He is to elevate his foot, but not apply ice. He is to follow up with Dr. X. He was given emergency contact numbers. He is to continue the Vicodin p.r.n. pain that he was taking previously for his shoulder pain and has enough of the medicine at home. The patient was discharged in stable condition.

preoperative diagnosis osteomyelitis left halluxpostoperative diagnosis osteomyelitis left halluxprocedures performed resection infected bone left hallux proximal phalanx distal phalanxanesthesia tivalocalhistory yearold male presents abcd preoperative holding area keeping npo since mid night surgery infected left hallux patient history chronic osteomyelitis nonhealing ulceration left hallux almost years duration failed outpatient antibiotic therapy conservative methods time desires attempt surgical correction patient interested hallux amputation time however consenting removal infected bone counseled preoperatively strong probability hallux floppy tail surgery accepts fact risks versus benefits procedure discussed patient detail dr x consent available chart reviewprocedure detail patients wound debrided blade good healthy tissue preoperatively wound planar medial distal dorsal medial wounds bases fibrous break bone point approximately cm diameter iv established department anesthesia patient taken operating room placed operating table supine position safety straps placed across waist protectiondue patients history diabetes marked calcifications xray pneumatic ankle tourniquet applied next total cc mixture marcaine plain lidocaine plain used infiltrate left hallux perform digital block next foot prepped draped usual aseptic fashion lowered operative field attention directed left hallux sterile stockinet reflected next blade used make linear incision approximately cm length along dorsal aspect hallux base proximal eponychium next incision deepened subcutaneous tissue heavy amount bleeding encountered therefore penrose drain applied tourniquet failed next esmarch bandage used exsanguinate distal toes forefoot left forefoot achieve hemostasis small veins crossing throughout subcutaneous layer ligated via electrocautery next medial lateral margins incision marked sharp dissection level long extension tendon long extensor tendon thickened overall exhibited signs hypertrophy transverse incision long extensor tendon made blade immediately upon entering joint yellow discolored fluid drained interphalangeal joint next extensor tendon peeled dorsally distally bone immediately head proximal phalanx found lytic disease friable crumbly free fragments medial aspect bone head proximal phalanx bone removed sharp dissection next adequate exposure obtained collateral ligaments released head proximal phalanx sagittal saw used resect approximately onehalf proximal phalanx passed infected bone specimen microbiology pathology next base distal phalanx exposed sharp dissection rongeur used remove soft crumbly diseased medial plantar aspect base distal phalanx next diseased soft tissue envelope around bone also resected good healthy tissue margins pulse lavage used flush wound cc gentamicinimpregnated saline next cleaned instruments used take proximal section proximal phalanx label clean margin bone found hard healthy appearing wound irrigation free debris infected tissue therefore anaerobic aerobic cultures taken sent microbiology next osteoset beads tobramycinimpregnated placed six beads placed wound next extensor tendon reapproximated vicryl subcutaneous layer closed vicryl simple interrupted technique next skin closed nylon horizontal mattress techniquethe esmarch bandage released immediate hyperemic flush noted digits standard postoperative dressing applied consisting x betadinesoaked silk kerlix kling loosely applied ace wrap patient tolerated anesthesia procedure without complications transported via cart postanesthesia care unit vitals signs stable vascular status intact given medium postop shoe wellformed fitting elevate foot apply ice follow dr x given emergency contact numbers continue vicodin prn pain taking previously shoulder pain enough medicine home patient discharged stable condition

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Osteomyelitis, left hallux.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Osteomyelitis, left hallux.,PROCEDURES PERFORMED: , Resection of infected bone, left hallux, proximal phalanx, and distal phalanx.,ANESTHESIA: , TIVA/Local.,HISTORY:, This 77-year-old male presents to ABCD preoperative holding area after keeping himself NPO since mid night for surgery on his infected left hallux. The patient has a history of chronic osteomyelitis and non-healing ulceration to the left hallux of almost 10 years' duration. He has failed outpatient antibiotic therapy and conservative methods. At this time, he desires to attempt surgical correction. The patient is not interested in a hallux amputation at this time; however, he is consenting to removal of infected bone. He was counseled preoperatively about the strong probability of the hallux being a "floppy tail" after the surgery and accepts the fact. The risks versus benefits of the procedure were discussed with the patient in detail by Dr. X and the consent is available on the chart for review.,PROCEDURE IN DETAIL: ,The patient's wound was debrided with a #15 blade and down to good healthy tissue preoperatively. The wound was on the planar medial, distal and dorsal medial. The wound's bases were fibrous. They did not break the bone at this point. They were each approximately 0.5 cm in diameter. After IV was established by the Department of Anesthesia, the patient was taken to the operating room and placed on the operating table in supine position with safety straps placed across his waist for his protection.,Due to the patient's history of diabetes and marked calcifications on x-ray, a pneumatic ankle tourniquet was not applied. Next, a total of 3 cc of a 1:1 mixture of 0.5% Marcaine plain and 1% lidocaine plain was used to infiltrate the left hallux and perform a digital block. Next, the foot was prepped and draped in the usual aseptic fashion. It was lowered in the operative field and attention was directed to the left hallux after the sterile stockinet was reflected. Next, a #10 blade was used to make a linear incision approximately 3.5 cm in length along the dorsal aspect of the hallux from the base to just proximal to the eponychium. Next, the incision was deepened through the subcutaneous tissue. A heavy amount of bleeding was encountered. Therefore, a Penrose drain was applied at the tourniquet, which failed. Next, an Esmarch bandage was used to exsanguinate the distal toes and forefoot and was left in the forefoot to achieve hemostasis. Any small veins crossing throughout the subcutaneous layer were ligated via electrocautery. Next, the medial and lateral margins of the incision were under marked with a sharp dissection down to the level of the long extension tendon. The long extensor tendon was thickened and overall exhibited signs of hypertrophy. The transverse incision through the long extensor tendon was made with a #15 blade. Immediately upon entering the joint, yellow discolored fluid was drained from the interphalangeal joint. Next, the extensor tendon was peeled dorsally and distally off the bone. Immediately the head of the proximal phalanx was found to be lytic, disease, friable, crumbly, and there were free fragments of the medial aspect of the bone, the head of the proximal phalanx. This bone was removed with a sharp dissection. Next, after adequate exposure was obtained and the collateral ligaments were released off the head of proximal phalanx, a sagittal saw was used to resect the approximately one-half of the proximal phalanx. This was passed off as the infected bone specimen for microbiology and pathology. Next, the base of the distal phalanx was exposed with sharp dissection and a rongeur was used to remove soft crumbly diseased medial and plantar aspect at the base of distal phalanx. Next, there was diseased soft tissue envelope around the bone, which was also resected to good healthy tissue margins. The pulse lavage was used to flush the wound with 1000 cc of gentamicin-impregnated saline. Next, cleaned instruments were used to take a proximal section of proximal phalanx to label a clean margin. This bone was found to be hard and healthy appearing. The wound after irrigation was free of all debris and infected tissue. Therefore anaerobic and aerobic cultures were taken and sent to microbiology. Next, OsteoSet beads, tobramycin-impregnated, were placed. Six beads were placed in the wound. Next, the extensor tendon was re-approximated with #3-0 Vicryl. The subcutaneous layer was closed with #4-0 Vicryl in a simple interrupted technique. Next, the skin was closed with #4-0 nylon in a horizontal mattress technique.,The Esmarch bandage was released and immediate hyperemic flush was noted at the digits. A standard postoperative dressing was applied consisting of 4 x 4s, Betadine-soaked #0-1 silk, Kerlix, Kling, and a loosely applied Ace wrap. The patient tolerated the above anesthesia and procedure without complications. He was transported via a cart to the Postanesthesia Care Unit. His vitals signs were stable and vascular status was intact. He was given a medium postop shoe that was well-formed and fitting. He is to elevate his foot, but not apply ice. He is to follow up with Dr. X. He was given emergency contact numbers. He is to continue the Vicodin p.r.n. pain that he was taking previously for his shoulder pain and has enough of the medicine at home. The patient was discharged in stable condition. ### Response: Orthopedic, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Ovarian cancer.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Ovarian cancer.,OPERATION PERFORMED:, Insertion of a Port-A-Catheter via the left subclavian vein approach under fluoroscopic guidance.,DETAILED OPERATIVE NOTE:, The patient was placed on the operating table and placed under LMA general anesthesia in preparation for insertion of a Port-A-Catheter. The chest was prepped and draped in the routine fashion for insertion of a Port-A-Catheter. The left subclavian vein was punctured with a single stick and a guidewire threaded through the needle into the superior vena cava under fluoroscopic guidance. The needle was removed. An incision was made over the guidewire for entrance of the dilator with sheath. A second counter incision was made transversally on the chest wall about an inch and half below the puncture site with a #15 blade. Hemostasis was effective to electrocautery, and a pocket was fashioned subcutaneously for positioning of the reservoir. The Port-A-Catheter reservoir tubing was attached to the reservoir in the routine fashion. The reservoir was placed in the pocket and sutured to the anterior chest wall muscle with three interrupted 4-0 Prolene sutures for stability. Next, a catheter passer was passed from the pocket exiting through the skin at the puncture site, previously placed for the guidewire, and the Port-A-Catheter was pulled from the reservoir exiting on the skin. It was placed on the chest, measured, and cut to the appropriate length. This having been done, the dilator with sheath attached was passed over the guidewire into the superior vena cava under fluoroscopic guidance. The guidewire and dilator were removed, and the Port-A-Catheter was threaded through the sheath into the superior vena cava, and the sheath removed under fluoroscopic guidance. Fluoroscopy revealed the Port-A-Catheter to be in excellent position. The Port-A-Catheter was accessed with a butterfly 90-degree needle percutaneously that drew blood well and flushed easily. It was flushed with heparinized saline connected in cath. This having been done, the puncture site was closed with a circumferential subcutaneous 3-0 Vicryl suture, and the skin was closed with a percutaneous circumferential subcuticular suture. This having been done, attention was applied to the reservoir incision. It was closed with two layers of continuous 3-0 Vicryl suture, and the skin was closed with a continuous 3-0 Monocryl subcuticular stitch. A dry sterile dressing was applied, and the patient having tolerated the procedure was transferred to the recovery room for postoperative care.

preoperative diagnosis ovarian cancerpostoperative diagnosis ovarian canceroperation performed insertion portacatheter via left subclavian vein approach fluoroscopic guidancedetailed operative note patient placed operating table placed lma general anesthesia preparation insertion portacatheter chest prepped draped routine fashion insertion portacatheter left subclavian vein punctured single stick guidewire threaded needle superior vena cava fluoroscopic guidance needle removed incision made guidewire entrance dilator sheath second counter incision made transversally chest wall inch half puncture site blade hemostasis effective electrocautery pocket fashioned subcutaneously positioning reservoir portacatheter reservoir tubing attached reservoir routine fashion reservoir placed pocket sutured anterior chest wall muscle three interrupted prolene sutures stability next catheter passer passed pocket exiting skin puncture site previously placed guidewire portacatheter pulled reservoir exiting skin placed chest measured cut appropriate length done dilator sheath attached passed guidewire superior vena cava fluoroscopic guidance guidewire dilator removed portacatheter threaded sheath superior vena cava sheath removed fluoroscopic guidance fluoroscopy revealed portacatheter excellent position portacatheter accessed butterfly degree needle percutaneously drew blood well flushed easily flushed heparinized saline connected cath done puncture site closed circumferential subcutaneous vicryl suture skin closed percutaneous circumferential subcuticular suture done attention applied reservoir incision closed two layers continuous vicryl suture skin closed continuous monocryl subcuticular stitch dry sterile dressing applied patient tolerated procedure transferred recovery room postoperative care

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Ovarian cancer.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Ovarian cancer.,OPERATION PERFORMED:, Insertion of a Port-A-Catheter via the left subclavian vein approach under fluoroscopic guidance.,DETAILED OPERATIVE NOTE:, The patient was placed on the operating table and placed under LMA general anesthesia in preparation for insertion of a Port-A-Catheter. The chest was prepped and draped in the routine fashion for insertion of a Port-A-Catheter. The left subclavian vein was punctured with a single stick and a guidewire threaded through the needle into the superior vena cava under fluoroscopic guidance. The needle was removed. An incision was made over the guidewire for entrance of the dilator with sheath. A second counter incision was made transversally on the chest wall about an inch and half below the puncture site with a #15 blade. Hemostasis was effective to electrocautery, and a pocket was fashioned subcutaneously for positioning of the reservoir. The Port-A-Catheter reservoir tubing was attached to the reservoir in the routine fashion. The reservoir was placed in the pocket and sutured to the anterior chest wall muscle with three interrupted 4-0 Prolene sutures for stability. Next, a catheter passer was passed from the pocket exiting through the skin at the puncture site, previously placed for the guidewire, and the Port-A-Catheter was pulled from the reservoir exiting on the skin. It was placed on the chest, measured, and cut to the appropriate length. This having been done, the dilator with sheath attached was passed over the guidewire into the superior vena cava under fluoroscopic guidance. The guidewire and dilator were removed, and the Port-A-Catheter was threaded through the sheath into the superior vena cava, and the sheath removed under fluoroscopic guidance. Fluoroscopy revealed the Port-A-Catheter to be in excellent position. The Port-A-Catheter was accessed with a butterfly 90-degree needle percutaneously that drew blood well and flushed easily. It was flushed with heparinized saline connected in cath. This having been done, the puncture site was closed with a circumferential subcutaneous 3-0 Vicryl suture, and the skin was closed with a percutaneous circumferential subcuticular suture. This having been done, attention was applied to the reservoir incision. It was closed with two layers of continuous 3-0 Vicryl suture, and the skin was closed with a continuous 3-0 Monocryl subcuticular stitch. A dry sterile dressing was applied, and the patient having tolerated the procedure was transferred to the recovery room for postoperative care. ### Response: Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Painful ingrown toenail, left big toe.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Painful ingrown toenail, left big toe.,OPERATION: , Removal of an ingrown part of the left big toenail with excision of the nail matrix.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: ,After obtaining informed consent, the patient was taken to the minor OR room and intravenous sedation with morphine and Versed was performed and the toe was blocked with 1% Xylocaine after having been prepped and draped in the usual fashion. The ingrown part of the toenail was freed from its bed and removed, then a flap of skin had been made in the area of the matrix supplying the particular part of the toenail. The matrix was excised down to the bone and then the skin flap was placed over it. Hemostasis had been achieved with a cautery. A tubular dressing was performed to provide a bulky dressing.,The patient tolerated the procedure well. Estimated blood loss was negligible. The patient was sent back to Same Day Surgery for recovery.

preoperative diagnosis painful ingrown toenail left big toepostoperative diagnosis painful ingrown toenail left big toeoperation removal ingrown part left big toenail excision nail matrixdescription procedure obtaining informed consent patient taken minor room intravenous sedation morphine versed performed toe blocked xylocaine prepped draped usual fashion ingrown part toenail freed bed removed flap skin made area matrix supplying particular part toenail matrix excised bone skin flap placed hemostasis achieved cautery tubular dressing performed provide bulky dressingthe patient tolerated procedure well estimated blood loss negligible patient sent back day surgery recovery

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Painful ingrown toenail, left big toe.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Painful ingrown toenail, left big toe.,OPERATION: , Removal of an ingrown part of the left big toenail with excision of the nail matrix.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: ,After obtaining informed consent, the patient was taken to the minor OR room and intravenous sedation with morphine and Versed was performed and the toe was blocked with 1% Xylocaine after having been prepped and draped in the usual fashion. The ingrown part of the toenail was freed from its bed and removed, then a flap of skin had been made in the area of the matrix supplying the particular part of the toenail. The matrix was excised down to the bone and then the skin flap was placed over it. Hemostasis had been achieved with a cautery. A tubular dressing was performed to provide a bulky dressing.,The patient tolerated the procedure well. Estimated blood loss was negligible. The patient was sent back to Same Day Surgery for recovery. ### Response: Orthopedic, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Partial rotator cuff tear, left shoulder.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Partial rotator cuff tear, left shoulder.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED:, Arthroscopy of the left shoulder with arthroscopic rotator cuff debridement, soft tissue decompression of the subacromial space of the left shoulder.,ANESTHESIA: ,Scalene block with general anesthesia.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS: , 30 cc.,COMPLICATIONS: , None.,DISPOSITION: ,The patient went to the PACU stable.,GROSS OPERATIVE FINDINGS: , There was no overt pathology of the biceps tendon. There was some softening and loss of the articular cartilage over the glenoid. The labrum was ________ attached permanently to the glenoid. The biceps tendon was nonsubluxable. Upon ranging of the shoulder in internal and external rotation showed no evidence of rotator cuff tear on the articular side. Subacromial space did show excessive soft tissue causing some overstuffing of the subacromial space. There was reconstitution of the bursa noted as well.,HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS:, This is a 51-year-old female had left shoulder pain of chronic nature who has had undergone prior rotator cuff debridement in May with partial pain relief and has had continued pain in the left shoulder. MRI shows partial rotator cuff tear.,PROCEDURE: , The patient was taken to the operating room and placed in a beachchair position. After all bony prominences were adequately padded, the head was placed in the headholder with no excessive extension in the neck on flexion. The left extremity was prepped and draped in usual fashion. The #18 gauge needles were inserted into the left shoulder to locate the AC joint, the lateral aspect of the acromion as well as the pass of the first trocar to enter the shoulder joint from the posterior aspect. We took an #11 blade scalpel and made a small 1-cm skin incision posteriorly approximately 4-cm inferior and medial to the lateral port of the acromion. A blunt trocar was used to bluntly cannulate the joint and we put the camera into the shoulder at that point of the joint and instilled sterile saline to distend the capsule and begin our arthroscopic assessment of the shoulder. A second port was established superior to the biceps tendon anteriorly under direct arthroscopic visualization using #11 blade on the skin and inserted bluntly the trocar and the cannula. The operative findings found intra-articularly were as described previously gross operative findings. We did not see any evidence of acute pathology. We then removed all the arthroscopic instruments as well as the trocars and tunneled subcutaneously into the subacromial space and reestablished the portal and camera and inflow with saline. The subacromial space was examined and found to have excessive soft tissue and bursa that was in the subacromial space that we debrided using arthroscopic shaver after establishing a lateral portal. All this was done and hemostasis was achieved. The rotator cuff was examined from the bursal side and showed no evidence of tears. There was some fraying out laterally near its attachment over the greater tuberosity, which was debrided with the arthroscopic shaver. We removed all of our instruments and suctioned the subacromial space dry. A #4-0 nylon was used on the three arthroscopic portal and on the skin we placed sterile dressing and the arm was placed in an arm sling. She was placed back on the gurney, extubated and taken to the PACU in stable condition.

preoperative diagnosis partial rotator cuff tear left shoulderpostoperative diagnosis partial rotator cuff tear left shoulderprocedure performed arthroscopy left shoulder arthroscopic rotator cuff debridement soft tissue decompression subacromial space left shoulderanesthesia scalene block general anesthesiaestimated blood loss cccomplications nonedisposition patient went pacu stablegross operative findings overt pathology biceps tendon softening loss articular cartilage glenoid labrum ________ attached permanently glenoid biceps tendon nonsubluxable upon ranging shoulder internal external rotation showed evidence rotator cuff tear articular side subacromial space show excessive soft tissue causing overstuffing subacromial space reconstitution bursa noted wellhistory present illness yearold female left shoulder pain chronic nature undergone prior rotator cuff debridement may partial pain relief continued pain left shoulder mri shows partial rotator cuff tearprocedure patient taken operating room placed beachchair position bony prominences adequately padded head placed headholder excessive extension neck flexion left extremity prepped draped usual fashion gauge needles inserted left shoulder locate ac joint lateral aspect acromion well pass first trocar enter shoulder joint posterior aspect took blade scalpel made small cm skin incision posteriorly approximately cm inferior medial lateral port acromion blunt trocar used bluntly cannulate joint put camera shoulder point joint instilled sterile saline distend capsule begin arthroscopic assessment shoulder second port established superior biceps tendon anteriorly direct arthroscopic visualization using blade skin inserted bluntly trocar cannula operative findings found intraarticularly described previously gross operative findings see evidence acute pathology removed arthroscopic instruments well trocars tunneled subcutaneously subacromial space reestablished portal camera inflow saline subacromial space examined found excessive soft tissue bursa subacromial space debrided using arthroscopic shaver establishing lateral portal done hemostasis achieved rotator cuff examined bursal side showed evidence tears fraying laterally near attachment greater tuberosity debrided arthroscopic shaver removed instruments suctioned subacromial space dry nylon used three arthroscopic portal skin placed sterile dressing arm placed arm sling placed back gurney extubated taken pacu stable condition

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Partial rotator cuff tear, left shoulder.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Partial rotator cuff tear, left shoulder.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED:, Arthroscopy of the left shoulder with arthroscopic rotator cuff debridement, soft tissue decompression of the subacromial space of the left shoulder.,ANESTHESIA: ,Scalene block with general anesthesia.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS: , 30 cc.,COMPLICATIONS: , None.,DISPOSITION: ,The patient went to the PACU stable.,GROSS OPERATIVE FINDINGS: , There was no overt pathology of the biceps tendon. There was some softening and loss of the articular cartilage over the glenoid. The labrum was ________ attached permanently to the glenoid. The biceps tendon was nonsubluxable. Upon ranging of the shoulder in internal and external rotation showed no evidence of rotator cuff tear on the articular side. Subacromial space did show excessive soft tissue causing some overstuffing of the subacromial space. There was reconstitution of the bursa noted as well.,HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS:, This is a 51-year-old female had left shoulder pain of chronic nature who has had undergone prior rotator cuff debridement in May with partial pain relief and has had continued pain in the left shoulder. MRI shows partial rotator cuff tear.,PROCEDURE: , The patient was taken to the operating room and placed in a beachchair position. After all bony prominences were adequately padded, the head was placed in the headholder with no excessive extension in the neck on flexion. The left extremity was prepped and draped in usual fashion. The #18 gauge needles were inserted into the left shoulder to locate the AC joint, the lateral aspect of the acromion as well as the pass of the first trocar to enter the shoulder joint from the posterior aspect. We took an #11 blade scalpel and made a small 1-cm skin incision posteriorly approximately 4-cm inferior and medial to the lateral port of the acromion. A blunt trocar was used to bluntly cannulate the joint and we put the camera into the shoulder at that point of the joint and instilled sterile saline to distend the capsule and begin our arthroscopic assessment of the shoulder. A second port was established superior to the biceps tendon anteriorly under direct arthroscopic visualization using #11 blade on the skin and inserted bluntly the trocar and the cannula. The operative findings found intra-articularly were as described previously gross operative findings. We did not see any evidence of acute pathology. We then removed all the arthroscopic instruments as well as the trocars and tunneled subcutaneously into the subacromial space and reestablished the portal and camera and inflow with saline. The subacromial space was examined and found to have excessive soft tissue and bursa that was in the subacromial space that we debrided using arthroscopic shaver after establishing a lateral portal. All this was done and hemostasis was achieved. The rotator cuff was examined from the bursal side and showed no evidence of tears. There was some fraying out laterally near its attachment over the greater tuberosity, which was debrided with the arthroscopic shaver. We removed all of our instruments and suctioned the subacromial space dry. A #4-0 nylon was used on the three arthroscopic portal and on the skin we placed sterile dressing and the arm was placed in an arm sling. She was placed back on the gurney, extubated and taken to the PACU in stable condition. ### Response: Orthopedic, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Penile skin bridges after circumcision.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Penile skin bridges after circumcision.,PROCEDURE: ,Excision of penile skin bridges about 2 cm in size.,ABNORMAL FINDINGS: ,Same as above.,ANESTHESIA: ,General inhalation anesthetic with caudal block.,FLUIDS RECEIVED: , 300 mL of crystalloids.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS: , Less than 5 mL.,SPECIMENS: , No tissue sent to Pathology.,TUBES AND DRAINS:, No tubes or drains were used.,COUNT: , Sponge and needle counts were correct x2.,INDICATIONS FOR OPERATION: ,The patient is a 2-1/2-year-old boy with a history of newborn circumcision who developed multiple skin bridges after circumcision causing curvature with erection. Plan is for repair.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: , The patient is taken to the operating room, where surgical consent, operative site, and the patient's identification was verified. Once he was anesthetized, the caudal block was placed and IV antibiotics were given. He was then placed in a supine position and sterilely prepped and draped. Once he was prepped and draped, we used a straight mosquito clamp and went under the bridges and crushed them, and then excised them with a curved iris and curved tenotomy scissors. We removed the excessive skin on the shaft skin and on the glans itself. We then on the ventrum excised the bridge and did a Heinecke-Mikulicz closure with interrupted figure-of-eight and interrupted suture of 5-0 chromic. Electrocautery was used for hemostasis. Once this was done, we then used Dermabond tissue adhesive and Surgicel to prevent the bridges from returning again. IV Toradol was given at the end of procedure. The patient tolerated the procedure well, was in stable condition upon transfer to the recovery room.

preoperative diagnosis penile skin bridges circumcisionpostoperative diagnosis penile skin bridges circumcisionprocedure excision penile skin bridges cm sizeabnormal findings aboveanesthesia general inhalation anesthetic caudal blockfluids received ml crystalloidsestimated blood loss less mlspecimens tissue sent pathologytubes drains tubes drains usedcount sponge needle counts correct xindications operation patient yearold boy history newborn circumcision developed multiple skin bridges circumcision causing curvature erection plan repairdescription procedure patient taken operating room surgical consent operative site patients identification verified anesthetized caudal block placed iv antibiotics given placed supine position sterilely prepped draped prepped draped used straight mosquito clamp went bridges crushed excised curved iris curved tenotomy scissors removed excessive skin shaft skin glans ventrum excised bridge heineckemikulicz closure interrupted figureofeight interrupted suture chromic electrocautery used hemostasis done used dermabond tissue adhesive surgicel prevent bridges returning iv toradol given end procedure patient tolerated procedure well stable condition upon transfer recovery room

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Penile skin bridges after circumcision.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Penile skin bridges after circumcision.,PROCEDURE: ,Excision of penile skin bridges about 2 cm in size.,ABNORMAL FINDINGS: ,Same as above.,ANESTHESIA: ,General inhalation anesthetic with caudal block.,FLUIDS RECEIVED: , 300 mL of crystalloids.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS: , Less than 5 mL.,SPECIMENS: , No tissue sent to Pathology.,TUBES AND DRAINS:, No tubes or drains were used.,COUNT: , Sponge and needle counts were correct x2.,INDICATIONS FOR OPERATION: ,The patient is a 2-1/2-year-old boy with a history of newborn circumcision who developed multiple skin bridges after circumcision causing curvature with erection. Plan is for repair.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: , The patient is taken to the operating room, where surgical consent, operative site, and the patient's identification was verified. Once he was anesthetized, the caudal block was placed and IV antibiotics were given. He was then placed in a supine position and sterilely prepped and draped. Once he was prepped and draped, we used a straight mosquito clamp and went under the bridges and crushed them, and then excised them with a curved iris and curved tenotomy scissors. We removed the excessive skin on the shaft skin and on the glans itself. We then on the ventrum excised the bridge and did a Heinecke-Mikulicz closure with interrupted figure-of-eight and interrupted suture of 5-0 chromic. Electrocautery was used for hemostasis. Once this was done, we then used Dermabond tissue adhesive and Surgicel to prevent the bridges from returning again. IV Toradol was given at the end of procedure. The patient tolerated the procedure well, was in stable condition upon transfer to the recovery room. ### Response: Surgery, Urology

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Penoscrotal abscess.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Penoscrotal abscess.,OPERATION: , Incision and drainage of the penoscrotal abscess, packing, penile biopsy, cystoscopy, and urethral dilation.,BRIEF HISTORY: , The patient is a 75-year-old male presented with penoscrotal abscess. Options such as watchful waiting, drainage, and antibiotics were discussed. Risks of anesthesia, bleeding, infection, pain, MI, DVT, PE, completely the infection turning into necrotizing fascitis, Fournier's gangrene were discussed. The patient already had significant phimotic changes and disfigurement of the penis. For further debridement the patient was told that his penis is not going to be viable, he may need a total or partial penectomy now or in the future. Risks of decreased penile sensation, pain, Foley, other unexpected issues were discussed. The patient understood all the complications and wanted to proceed with the procedure.,DETAIL OF THE OPERATION: ,The patient was brought to the OR. The patient was placed in dorsal lithotomy position. The patient was prepped and draped in the usual fashion. Pictures were taken prior to starting the procedure for documentation. The patient had an open sore on the right side of the penis measuring about 1 cm in size with pouring pus out using blunt dissection. The penile area was opened up distally to allow the pus to come out. The dissection around the proximal scrotum was done to make sure there are no other pus pockets. The corporal body was intact, but the distal part of the corpora was completely eroded and had a fungating mass, which was biopsied and sent for permanent pathology analysis.,Urethra was identified at the distal tip, which was dilated and using 23-French cystoscope cystoscopy was done, which showed some urethral narrowing in the distal part of the urethra. The rest of the bladder appeared normal. The prostatic urethra was slightly enlarged. There are no stones or tumors inside the bladder. There were moderate trabeculations inside the bladder. Otherwise, the bladder and the urethra appeared normal. There was a significantly fungating mass involving the distal part of the urethra almost possibility to have including the fungating wart or fungating squamous cell carcinoma. Again biopsies were sent for pathology analysis. Prior to urine irrigation anaerobic aerobic cultures were sent, irrigation with over 2 L of fluid was performed. After irrigation, packing was done with Kerlix. The patient was brought to recovery in a stable condition. Please note that 18-French Foley was kept in place. Electrocautery was used at the end of the procedure to obtain hemostasis as much as possible, but there was fungating mass with slight bleeding packing was done and tight scrotal Kling was applied. The patient was brought to Recovery in a stable condition after applying 0.5% Marcaine about 20 mL were injected around for local anesthesia.

preoperative diagnosis penoscrotal abscesspostoperative diagnosis penoscrotal abscessoperation incision drainage penoscrotal abscess packing penile biopsy cystoscopy urethral dilationbrief history patient yearold male presented penoscrotal abscess options watchful waiting drainage antibiotics discussed risks anesthesia bleeding infection pain mi dvt pe completely infection turning necrotizing fascitis fourniers gangrene discussed patient already significant phimotic changes disfigurement penis debridement patient told penis going viable may need total partial penectomy future risks decreased penile sensation pain foley unexpected issues discussed patient understood complications wanted proceed proceduredetail operation patient brought patient placed dorsal lithotomy position patient prepped draped usual fashion pictures taken prior starting procedure documentation patient open sore right side penis measuring cm size pouring pus using blunt dissection penile area opened distally allow pus come dissection around proximal scrotum done make sure pus pockets corporal body intact distal part corpora completely eroded fungating mass biopsied sent permanent pathology analysisurethra identified distal tip dilated using french cystoscope cystoscopy done showed urethral narrowing distal part urethra rest bladder appeared normal prostatic urethra slightly enlarged stones tumors inside bladder moderate trabeculations inside bladder otherwise bladder urethra appeared normal significantly fungating mass involving distal part urethra almost possibility including fungating wart fungating squamous cell carcinoma biopsies sent pathology analysis prior urine irrigation anaerobic aerobic cultures sent irrigation l fluid performed irrigation packing done kerlix patient brought recovery stable condition please note french foley kept place electrocautery used end procedure obtain hemostasis much possible fungating mass slight bleeding packing done tight scrotal kling applied patient brought recovery stable condition applying marcaine ml injected around local anesthesia

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Penoscrotal abscess.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Penoscrotal abscess.,OPERATION: , Incision and drainage of the penoscrotal abscess, packing, penile biopsy, cystoscopy, and urethral dilation.,BRIEF HISTORY: , The patient is a 75-year-old male presented with penoscrotal abscess. Options such as watchful waiting, drainage, and antibiotics were discussed. Risks of anesthesia, bleeding, infection, pain, MI, DVT, PE, completely the infection turning into necrotizing fascitis, Fournier's gangrene were discussed. The patient already had significant phimotic changes and disfigurement of the penis. For further debridement the patient was told that his penis is not going to be viable, he may need a total or partial penectomy now or in the future. Risks of decreased penile sensation, pain, Foley, other unexpected issues were discussed. The patient understood all the complications and wanted to proceed with the procedure.,DETAIL OF THE OPERATION: ,The patient was brought to the OR. The patient was placed in dorsal lithotomy position. The patient was prepped and draped in the usual fashion. Pictures were taken prior to starting the procedure for documentation. The patient had an open sore on the right side of the penis measuring about 1 cm in size with pouring pus out using blunt dissection. The penile area was opened up distally to allow the pus to come out. The dissection around the proximal scrotum was done to make sure there are no other pus pockets. The corporal body was intact, but the distal part of the corpora was completely eroded and had a fungating mass, which was biopsied and sent for permanent pathology analysis.,Urethra was identified at the distal tip, which was dilated and using 23-French cystoscope cystoscopy was done, which showed some urethral narrowing in the distal part of the urethra. The rest of the bladder appeared normal. The prostatic urethra was slightly enlarged. There are no stones or tumors inside the bladder. There were moderate trabeculations inside the bladder. Otherwise, the bladder and the urethra appeared normal. There was a significantly fungating mass involving the distal part of the urethra almost possibility to have including the fungating wart or fungating squamous cell carcinoma. Again biopsies were sent for pathology analysis. Prior to urine irrigation anaerobic aerobic cultures were sent, irrigation with over 2 L of fluid was performed. After irrigation, packing was done with Kerlix. The patient was brought to recovery in a stable condition. Please note that 18-French Foley was kept in place. Electrocautery was used at the end of the procedure to obtain hemostasis as much as possible, but there was fungating mass with slight bleeding packing was done and tight scrotal Kling was applied. The patient was brought to Recovery in a stable condition after applying 0.5% Marcaine about 20 mL were injected around for local anesthesia. ### Response: Surgery, Urology

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Persistent pneumonia, right upper lobe of the lung, possible mass.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Persistent pneumonia, right upper lobe of the lung, possible mass.,PROCEDURE:, Bronchoscopy with brush biopsies.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: , After obtaining an informed consent, the patient was taken to the operating room where he underwent a general endotracheal anesthesia. A time-out process had been followed and then the flexible bronchoscope was inserted through the endotracheal tube after 2 cc of 4% lidocaine had been infused into the endotracheal tube. First the trachea and the carina had normal appearance. The scope was passed into the left side and the bronchial system was found to be normal. There were scars and mucoid secretions. Then the scope was passed into the right side where brown secretions were obtained and collected in a trap to be sent for culture and sensitivity of aerobic and anaerobic fungi and TB. First, the basal lobes were explored and found to be normal. Then, the right upper lobe was selectively cannulated and no abnormalities were found except some secretions were aspirated. Then, the bronchi going to the three segments were visualized and no abnormalities or mass were found. Brush biopsy was obtained from one of the segments and sent to Pathology.,The procedure had to be interrupted several times because of the patient's desaturation, but after a few minutes of Ambu bagging, he recovered satisfactorily.,At the end, the patient tolerated the procedure well and was sent to the recovery room in satisfactory condition.,

preoperative diagnosis persistent pneumonia right upper lobe lung possible masspostoperative diagnosis persistent pneumonia right upper lobe lung possible massprocedure bronchoscopy brush biopsiesdescription procedure obtaining informed consent patient taken operating room underwent general endotracheal anesthesia timeout process followed flexible bronchoscope inserted endotracheal tube cc lidocaine infused endotracheal tube first trachea carina normal appearance scope passed left side bronchial system found normal scars mucoid secretions scope passed right side brown secretions obtained collected trap sent culture sensitivity aerobic anaerobic fungi tb first basal lobes explored found normal right upper lobe selectively cannulated abnormalities found except secretions aspirated bronchi going three segments visualized abnormalities mass found brush biopsy obtained one segments sent pathologythe procedure interrupted several times patients desaturation minutes ambu bagging recovered satisfactorilyat end patient tolerated procedure well sent recovery room satisfactory condition

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Persistent pneumonia, right upper lobe of the lung, possible mass.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Persistent pneumonia, right upper lobe of the lung, possible mass.,PROCEDURE:, Bronchoscopy with brush biopsies.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: , After obtaining an informed consent, the patient was taken to the operating room where he underwent a general endotracheal anesthesia. A time-out process had been followed and then the flexible bronchoscope was inserted through the endotracheal tube after 2 cc of 4% lidocaine had been infused into the endotracheal tube. First the trachea and the carina had normal appearance. The scope was passed into the left side and the bronchial system was found to be normal. There were scars and mucoid secretions. Then the scope was passed into the right side where brown secretions were obtained and collected in a trap to be sent for culture and sensitivity of aerobic and anaerobic fungi and TB. First, the basal lobes were explored and found to be normal. Then, the right upper lobe was selectively cannulated and no abnormalities were found except some secretions were aspirated. Then, the bronchi going to the three segments were visualized and no abnormalities or mass were found. Brush biopsy was obtained from one of the segments and sent to Pathology.,The procedure had to be interrupted several times because of the patient's desaturation, but after a few minutes of Ambu bagging, he recovered satisfactorily.,At the end, the patient tolerated the procedure well and was sent to the recovery room in satisfactory condition., ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Phimosis.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Phimosis.,PROCEDURE: , Reduction of paraphimosis.,ANESTHESIA: ,General inhalation anesthetic with 0.25% Marcaine, penile block and ring block about 20 mL given.,FLUIDS RECEIVED: , 100 mL.,SPECIMENS:, No tissues sent to pathology.,COUNTS: , Sponge and needle counts were not necessary.,TUBES/DRAINS: , No tubes or drains were used.,FINDINGS: , Paraphimosis with moderate swelling.,INDICATIONS FOR OPERATION: , The patient is a 15-year-old boy who had acute alcohol intoxication had his foreskin retracted with a Foley catheter placed at another institution. When they removed the catheter they forgot to reduce the foreskin and he developed paraphimosis. The plan is for reduction.,DESCRIPTION OF OPERATION: , The patient was taken to the operating room where surgical consent, operative site, and patient identification were verified. Once he was anesthetized, with manual pressure and mobilization of the shaft skin we were able to reduce the paraphimosis. Using Betadine and alcohol cleanse, we then did a dorsal penile block and a ring block by surgeon with 0.25% Marcaine, 20 mL were given. He did quite well after the procedure and was transferred to the recovery room in stable condition.

preoperative diagnosis phimosispostoperative diagnosis phimosisprocedure reduction paraphimosisanesthesia general inhalation anesthetic marcaine penile block ring block ml givenfluids received mlspecimens tissues sent pathologycounts sponge needle counts necessarytubesdrains tubes drains usedfindings paraphimosis moderate swellingindications operation patient yearold boy acute alcohol intoxication foreskin retracted foley catheter placed another institution removed catheter forgot reduce foreskin developed paraphimosis plan reductiondescription operation patient taken operating room surgical consent operative site patient identification verified anesthetized manual pressure mobilization shaft skin able reduce paraphimosis using betadine alcohol cleanse dorsal penile block ring block surgeon marcaine ml given quite well procedure transferred recovery room stable condition

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Phimosis.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Phimosis.,PROCEDURE: , Reduction of paraphimosis.,ANESTHESIA: ,General inhalation anesthetic with 0.25% Marcaine, penile block and ring block about 20 mL given.,FLUIDS RECEIVED: , 100 mL.,SPECIMENS:, No tissues sent to pathology.,COUNTS: , Sponge and needle counts were not necessary.,TUBES/DRAINS: , No tubes or drains were used.,FINDINGS: , Paraphimosis with moderate swelling.,INDICATIONS FOR OPERATION: , The patient is a 15-year-old boy who had acute alcohol intoxication had his foreskin retracted with a Foley catheter placed at another institution. When they removed the catheter they forgot to reduce the foreskin and he developed paraphimosis. The plan is for reduction.,DESCRIPTION OF OPERATION: , The patient was taken to the operating room where surgical consent, operative site, and patient identification were verified. Once he was anesthetized, with manual pressure and mobilization of the shaft skin we were able to reduce the paraphimosis. Using Betadine and alcohol cleanse, we then did a dorsal penile block and a ring block by surgeon with 0.25% Marcaine, 20 mL were given. He did quite well after the procedure and was transferred to the recovery room in stable condition. ### Response: Surgery, Urology

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Pilonidal cyst with abscess formation.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Pilonidal cyst with abscess formation.,OPERATION: , Excision of infected pilonidal cyst.,PROCEDURE: , After obtaining informed consent, the patient underwent a spinal anesthetic and was placed in the prone position in the operating room. A time-out process was followed. Antibiotics were given and then the patient was prepped and draped in the usual fashion. It appeared to me that the abscess had drained somewhat during the night, as it was much smaller than I was anticipating. An elliptical excision of all infected tissues down to the coccyx was performed. Hemostasis was achieved with a cautery. The wound was irrigated with normal saline and it was packed open with iodoform gauze and an absorptive dressing.,The patient was sent to recovery room in satisfactory condition. Estimated blood loss was minimal. The patient tolerated the procedure well.

preoperative diagnosis pilonidal cyst abscess formationpostoperative diagnosis pilonidal cyst abscess formationoperation excision infected pilonidal cystprocedure obtaining informed consent patient underwent spinal anesthetic placed prone position operating room timeout process followed antibiotics given patient prepped draped usual fashion appeared abscess drained somewhat night much smaller anticipating elliptical excision infected tissues coccyx performed hemostasis achieved cautery wound irrigated normal saline packed open iodoform gauze absorptive dressingthe patient sent recovery room satisfactory condition estimated blood loss minimal patient tolerated procedure well

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Pilonidal cyst with abscess formation.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Pilonidal cyst with abscess formation.,OPERATION: , Excision of infected pilonidal cyst.,PROCEDURE: , After obtaining informed consent, the patient underwent a spinal anesthetic and was placed in the prone position in the operating room. A time-out process was followed. Antibiotics were given and then the patient was prepped and draped in the usual fashion. It appeared to me that the abscess had drained somewhat during the night, as it was much smaller than I was anticipating. An elliptical excision of all infected tissues down to the coccyx was performed. Hemostasis was achieved with a cautery. The wound was irrigated with normal saline and it was packed open with iodoform gauze and an absorptive dressing.,The patient was sent to recovery room in satisfactory condition. Estimated blood loss was minimal. The patient tolerated the procedure well. ### Response: Hematology - Oncology, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Possible inflammatory bowel disease.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Polyp of the sigmoid colon.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED: ,Total colonoscopy with photography and polypectomy.,GROSS FINDINGS: , The patient had a history of ischiorectal abscess. He has been evaluated now for inflammatory bowel disease. Upon endoscopy, the colon prep was good. We were able to reach the cecum without difficulty. There are no diverticluli, inflammatory bowel disease, strictures, or obstructing lesions. There was a pedunculated polyp approximately 4.5 cm in size located in the sigmoid colon at approximately 35 cm. This large polyp was removed using the snare technique.,OPERATIVE PROCEDURE: ,The patient was taken to the endoscopy suite, prepped and draped in left lateral decubitus position. IV sedation was given by Anesthesia Department. The Olympus videoscope was inserted into anus. Using air insufflation, the colonoscope was advanced through the anus to the rectum, sigmoid colon, descending colon, transverse colon, ascending colon and cecum, the above gross findings were noted. The colonoscope was slowly withdrawn and carefully examined the lumen of the bowel. When the polyp again was visualized, the snare was passed around the polyp. It required at least two to three passes of the snare to remove the polyp in its totality. There was a large stalk on the polyp. ________ the polyp had been removed down to the junction of the polyp in the stalk, which appeared to be cauterized and no residual adenomatous tissue was present. No bleeding was identified. The colonoscope was then removed and patient was sent to recovery room in stable condition.

preoperative diagnosis possible inflammatory bowel diseasepostoperative diagnosis polyp sigmoid colonprocedure performed total colonoscopy photography polypectomygross findings patient history ischiorectal abscess evaluated inflammatory bowel disease upon endoscopy colon prep good able reach cecum without difficulty diverticluli inflammatory bowel disease strictures obstructing lesions pedunculated polyp approximately cm size located sigmoid colon approximately cm large polyp removed using snare techniqueoperative procedure patient taken endoscopy suite prepped draped left lateral decubitus position iv sedation given anesthesia department olympus videoscope inserted anus using air insufflation colonoscope advanced anus rectum sigmoid colon descending colon transverse colon ascending colon cecum gross findings noted colonoscope slowly withdrawn carefully examined lumen bowel polyp visualized snare passed around polyp required least two three passes snare remove polyp totality large stalk polyp ________ polyp removed junction polyp stalk appeared cauterized residual adenomatous tissue present bleeding identified colonoscope removed patient sent recovery room stable condition

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Possible inflammatory bowel disease.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Polyp of the sigmoid colon.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED: ,Total colonoscopy with photography and polypectomy.,GROSS FINDINGS: , The patient had a history of ischiorectal abscess. He has been evaluated now for inflammatory bowel disease. Upon endoscopy, the colon prep was good. We were able to reach the cecum without difficulty. There are no diverticluli, inflammatory bowel disease, strictures, or obstructing lesions. There was a pedunculated polyp approximately 4.5 cm in size located in the sigmoid colon at approximately 35 cm. This large polyp was removed using the snare technique.,OPERATIVE PROCEDURE: ,The patient was taken to the endoscopy suite, prepped and draped in left lateral decubitus position. IV sedation was given by Anesthesia Department. The Olympus videoscope was inserted into anus. Using air insufflation, the colonoscope was advanced through the anus to the rectum, sigmoid colon, descending colon, transverse colon, ascending colon and cecum, the above gross findings were noted. The colonoscope was slowly withdrawn and carefully examined the lumen of the bowel. When the polyp again was visualized, the snare was passed around the polyp. It required at least two to three passes of the snare to remove the polyp in its totality. There was a large stalk on the polyp. ________ the polyp had been removed down to the junction of the polyp in the stalk, which appeared to be cauterized and no residual adenomatous tissue was present. No bleeding was identified. The colonoscope was then removed and patient was sent to recovery room in stable condition. ### Response: Gastroenterology, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Post infarct angina.,TYPE OF PROCEDURE: , Left cardiac catheterization with selective right and left coronary angiography.,PROCEDURE: , After informed consent was obtained, the patient was brought to the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, and the groin was prepped in the usual fashion. Using 1% lidocaine, the right groin was infiltrated, and using the Seldinger technique, the right femoral artery was cannulated. Through this, a moveable guidewire was then advance to the level of the diaphragm, and through it, a 6 French pigtail catheter was advanced under hemodynamic monitoring to the ascending aorta and inserted into the left ventricle. Pressure measurements were obtained and cineangiograms in the RAO and LAO positions were then obtained. Catheter was then withdrawn and a #6 French non-bleed-back sidearm sheath was then introduced, and through this, a 6 French Judkins left coronary catheter was then advanced under hemodynamic monitoring to the left coronary ostium, engaged. Cineangiograms were obtained of the left coronary system. This catheter was then exchanged for a Judkins right 4 coronary catheter of similar dimension and under hemodynamic monitoring again was advanced to the right coronary ostium, engaged. Cineangiograms were obtained, and the catheter and sheath were then withdrawn. The patient tolerated the procedure well and left the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory in stable condition. No evidence of hematoma formation or active bleeding. ,COMPLICATIONS: , None. ,TOTAL CONTRAST: , 110 cc of Hexabrix. ,TOTAL FLUOROSCOPY TIME: ,1.8 minutes. ,MEDICATIONS: , Reglan 10 mg p.o., 5 mg p.o. Valium, Benadryl 50 mg p.o. and heparin 3,000 units IV push.

preoperative diagnosis post infarct anginatype procedure left cardiac catheterization selective right left coronary angiographyprocedure informed consent obtained patient brought cardiac catheterization laboratory groin prepped usual fashion using lidocaine right groin infiltrated using seldinger technique right femoral artery cannulated moveable guidewire advance level diaphragm french pigtail catheter advanced hemodynamic monitoring ascending aorta inserted left ventricle pressure measurements obtained cineangiograms rao lao positions obtained catheter withdrawn french nonbleedback sidearm sheath introduced french judkins left coronary catheter advanced hemodynamic monitoring left coronary ostium engaged cineangiograms obtained left coronary system catheter exchanged judkins right coronary catheter similar dimension hemodynamic monitoring advanced right coronary ostium engaged cineangiograms obtained catheter sheath withdrawn patient tolerated procedure well left cardiac catheterization laboratory stable condition evidence hematoma formation active bleeding complications none total contrast cc hexabrix total fluoroscopy time minutes medications reglan mg po mg po valium benadryl mg po heparin units iv push

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Post infarct angina.,TYPE OF PROCEDURE: , Left cardiac catheterization with selective right and left coronary angiography.,PROCEDURE: , After informed consent was obtained, the patient was brought to the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, and the groin was prepped in the usual fashion. Using 1% lidocaine, the right groin was infiltrated, and using the Seldinger technique, the right femoral artery was cannulated. Through this, a moveable guidewire was then advance to the level of the diaphragm, and through it, a 6 French pigtail catheter was advanced under hemodynamic monitoring to the ascending aorta and inserted into the left ventricle. Pressure measurements were obtained and cineangiograms in the RAO and LAO positions were then obtained. Catheter was then withdrawn and a #6 French non-bleed-back sidearm sheath was then introduced, and through this, a 6 French Judkins left coronary catheter was then advanced under hemodynamic monitoring to the left coronary ostium, engaged. Cineangiograms were obtained of the left coronary system. This catheter was then exchanged for a Judkins right 4 coronary catheter of similar dimension and under hemodynamic monitoring again was advanced to the right coronary ostium, engaged. Cineangiograms were obtained, and the catheter and sheath were then withdrawn. The patient tolerated the procedure well and left the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory in stable condition. No evidence of hematoma formation or active bleeding. ,COMPLICATIONS: , None. ,TOTAL CONTRAST: , 110 cc of Hexabrix. ,TOTAL FLUOROSCOPY TIME: ,1.8 minutes. ,MEDICATIONS: , Reglan 10 mg p.o., 5 mg p.o. Valium, Benadryl 50 mg p.o. and heparin 3,000 units IV push. ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Postmenopausal bleeding.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Same.,OPERATION PERFORMED: ,Fractional dilatation and curettage.,SPECIMENS: , Endocervical curettings, endometrial curettings.,INDICATIONS FOR PROCEDURE: , The patient recently presented with postmenopausal bleeding. An office endometrial biopsy was unable to be performed secondary to a stenotic internal cervical os.,FINDINGS: , Examination under anesthesia revealed a retroverted, retroflexed uterus with fundal diameter of 6.5 cm. The uterine cavity was smooth upon curettage. Curettings were fairly copious. Sounding depth was 8 cm.,PROCEDURE:, The patient was brought to the Operating Room with an IV in place. The patient was given a general anesthetic and was placed in the lithotomy position. Examination under anesthesia was completed with findings as noted. She was prepped and draped and a speculum was placed into the vagina. ,Tenaculum was placed on the cervix. The endocervical canal was curetted using a Kevorkian curette, and the sound was used to measure the overall depth of the uterus. The endocervical canal was dilated without difficulty to a size 16 French dilator. A small, sharp curette was passed into the uterine cavity and curettings were obtained.,After completion of the curettage, polyp forceps were passed into the uterine cavity. No additional tissue was obtained. Upon completion of the dilatation and curettage, minimum blood loss was noted.,The patient was awakened from her anesthetic, and taken to the post anesthesia care unit in stable condition.

preoperative diagnosis postmenopausal bleedingpostoperative diagnosis sameoperation performed fractional dilatation curettagespecimens endocervical curettings endometrial curettingsindications procedure patient recently presented postmenopausal bleeding office endometrial biopsy unable performed secondary stenotic internal cervical osfindings examination anesthesia revealed retroverted retroflexed uterus fundal diameter cm uterine cavity smooth upon curettage curettings fairly copious sounding depth cmprocedure patient brought operating room iv place patient given general anesthetic placed lithotomy position examination anesthesia completed findings noted prepped draped speculum placed vagina tenaculum placed cervix endocervical canal curetted using kevorkian curette sound used measure overall depth uterus endocervical canal dilated without difficulty size french dilator small sharp curette passed uterine cavity curettings obtainedafter completion curettage polyp forceps passed uterine cavity additional tissue obtained upon completion dilatation curettage minimum blood loss notedthe patient awakened anesthetic taken post anesthesia care unit stable condition

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Postmenopausal bleeding.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Same.,OPERATION PERFORMED: ,Fractional dilatation and curettage.,SPECIMENS: , Endocervical curettings, endometrial curettings.,INDICATIONS FOR PROCEDURE: , The patient recently presented with postmenopausal bleeding. An office endometrial biopsy was unable to be performed secondary to a stenotic internal cervical os.,FINDINGS: , Examination under anesthesia revealed a retroverted, retroflexed uterus with fundal diameter of 6.5 cm. The uterine cavity was smooth upon curettage. Curettings were fairly copious. Sounding depth was 8 cm.,PROCEDURE:, The patient was brought to the Operating Room with an IV in place. The patient was given a general anesthetic and was placed in the lithotomy position. Examination under anesthesia was completed with findings as noted. She was prepped and draped and a speculum was placed into the vagina. ,Tenaculum was placed on the cervix. The endocervical canal was curetted using a Kevorkian curette, and the sound was used to measure the overall depth of the uterus. The endocervical canal was dilated without difficulty to a size 16 French dilator. A small, sharp curette was passed into the uterine cavity and curettings were obtained.,After completion of the curettage, polyp forceps were passed into the uterine cavity. No additional tissue was obtained. Upon completion of the dilatation and curettage, minimum blood loss was noted.,The patient was awakened from her anesthetic, and taken to the post anesthesia care unit in stable condition. ### Response: Obstetrics / Gynecology, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Postoperative hemorrhage.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Postoperative hemorrhage.,SURGICAL PROCEDURE: ,Examination under anesthesia with control of right parapharyngeal space hemorrhage.,ANESTHESIA: ,General endotracheal technique.,SURGICAL FINDINGS: , Right lower pole bleeder cauterized with electrocautery with good hemostasis.,INDICATIONS FOR SURGERY: , The patient is a 35-year-old female with a history of a chronic pharyngitis and obstructive adenotonsillar hypertrophy. Previously, in the day she had undergone a tonsillectomy with adenoidectomy and was recovering without difficulty. However, in the PACU after a coughing spell she began bleeding from the right oropharynx, and was taken back to the operative suite for control of hemorrhage.,DESCRIPTION OF SURGERY: ,The patient was placed supine on the operating room table and general anesthetic was administered, once appropriate anesthetic findings achieved the patient was intubated and then prepped and draped in usual sterile manner for a parapharyngeal space hemorrhage. A Crowe-Davis type mouth gag was introduced in the oropharynx and under operating headlight the oropharynx was clearly visualized. There was a small bleeder present at the inferior mid pole of the right oropharynx in the tonsillar fossa, this area was cauterized with suction cautery and irrigated. There was no other bleeding noted. The patient was repositioned and the mouth gag, the tongue was rotated to the left side of the mouth and the right parapharyngeal space carefully examined. There was a small amount of oozing noted in the right tonsillar bed, and this was cauterized with suction cautery. No other bleeding was noted and the patient was recovered from general anesthetic. She was extubated and left the operating room in good condition to postoperative recovery room area. Prior to extubation the patient's tonsillar fossa were injected with a 6 mL of 0.25% Marcaine with 1:100,000 adrenalin solution to facilitate postoperative analgesia and hemostasis.

preoperative diagnosis postoperative hemorrhagepostoperative diagnosis postoperative hemorrhagesurgical procedure examination anesthesia control right parapharyngeal space hemorrhageanesthesia general endotracheal techniquesurgical findings right lower pole bleeder cauterized electrocautery good hemostasisindications surgery patient yearold female history chronic pharyngitis obstructive adenotonsillar hypertrophy previously day undergone tonsillectomy adenoidectomy recovering without difficulty however pacu coughing spell began bleeding right oropharynx taken back operative suite control hemorrhagedescription surgery patient placed supine operating room table general anesthetic administered appropriate anesthetic findings achieved patient intubated prepped draped usual sterile manner parapharyngeal space hemorrhage crowedavis type mouth gag introduced oropharynx operating headlight oropharynx clearly visualized small bleeder present inferior mid pole right oropharynx tonsillar fossa area cauterized suction cautery irrigated bleeding noted patient repositioned mouth gag tongue rotated left side mouth right parapharyngeal space carefully examined small amount oozing noted right tonsillar bed cauterized suction cautery bleeding noted patient recovered general anesthetic extubated left operating room good condition postoperative recovery room area prior extubation patients tonsillar fossa injected ml marcaine adrenalin solution facilitate postoperative analgesia hemostasis

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Postoperative hemorrhage.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Postoperative hemorrhage.,SURGICAL PROCEDURE: ,Examination under anesthesia with control of right parapharyngeal space hemorrhage.,ANESTHESIA: ,General endotracheal technique.,SURGICAL FINDINGS: , Right lower pole bleeder cauterized with electrocautery with good hemostasis.,INDICATIONS FOR SURGERY: , The patient is a 35-year-old female with a history of a chronic pharyngitis and obstructive adenotonsillar hypertrophy. Previously, in the day she had undergone a tonsillectomy with adenoidectomy and was recovering without difficulty. However, in the PACU after a coughing spell she began bleeding from the right oropharynx, and was taken back to the operative suite for control of hemorrhage.,DESCRIPTION OF SURGERY: ,The patient was placed supine on the operating room table and general anesthetic was administered, once appropriate anesthetic findings achieved the patient was intubated and then prepped and draped in usual sterile manner for a parapharyngeal space hemorrhage. A Crowe-Davis type mouth gag was introduced in the oropharynx and under operating headlight the oropharynx was clearly visualized. There was a small bleeder present at the inferior mid pole of the right oropharynx in the tonsillar fossa, this area was cauterized with suction cautery and irrigated. There was no other bleeding noted. The patient was repositioned and the mouth gag, the tongue was rotated to the left side of the mouth and the right parapharyngeal space carefully examined. There was a small amount of oozing noted in the right tonsillar bed, and this was cauterized with suction cautery. No other bleeding was noted and the patient was recovered from general anesthetic. She was extubated and left the operating room in good condition to postoperative recovery room area. Prior to extubation the patient's tonsillar fossa were injected with a 6 mL of 0.25% Marcaine with 1:100,000 adrenalin solution to facilitate postoperative analgesia and hemostasis. ### Response: ENT - Otolaryngology, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Postpartum hemorrhage.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Postpartum hemorrhage.,PROCEDURE:, Exam under anesthesia. Removal of intrauterine clots.,ANESTHESIA: , Conscious sedation.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS:, Approximately 200 mL during the procedure, but at least 500 mL prior to that and probably more like 1500 mL prior to that.,COMPLICATIONS: , None.,INDICATIONS AND CONCERNS: , This is a 19-year-old G1, P1 female, status post vaginal delivery, who was being evaluated by the nurse on labor and delivery approximately four hours after her delivery. I was called for persistent bleeding and passing large clots. I examined the patient and found her to have at least 500 mL of clots in her uterus. She was unable to tolerate exam any further than that because of concerns of the amount of bleeding that she had already had and inability to adequately evaluate her. I did advise her that I would recommend they came under anesthesia and dilation and curettage. Risks and benefits of this procedure were discussed with Misty, all of her questions were adequately answered and informed consent was obtained.,PROCEDURE: , The patient was taken to the operating room where satisfactory conscious sedation was performed. She was placed in the dorsal lithotomy position, prepped and draped in the usual fashion. Bimanual exam revealed moderate amount of clot in the uterus. I was able to remove most of the clots with my hands and an attempt at short curettage was performed, but because of contraction of the uterus this was unable to be adequately performed. I was able to thoroughly examine the uterine cavity with my hand and no remaining clots or placental tissue or membranes were found. At this point, the procedure was terminated. Bleeding at this time was minimal. Preop H&H were 8.3 and 24.2. The patient tolerated the procedure well and was taken to the recovery room in good condition.

preoperative diagnosis postpartum hemorrhagepostoperative diagnosis postpartum hemorrhageprocedure exam anesthesia removal intrauterine clotsanesthesia conscious sedationestimated blood loss approximately ml procedure least ml prior probably like ml prior thatcomplications noneindications concerns yearold g p female status post vaginal delivery evaluated nurse labor delivery approximately four hours delivery called persistent bleeding passing large clots examined patient found least ml clots uterus unable tolerate exam concerns amount bleeding already inability adequately evaluate advise would recommend came anesthesia dilation curettage risks benefits procedure discussed misty questions adequately answered informed consent obtainedprocedure patient taken operating room satisfactory conscious sedation performed placed dorsal lithotomy position prepped draped usual fashion bimanual exam revealed moderate amount clot uterus able remove clots hands attempt short curettage performed contraction uterus unable adequately performed able thoroughly examine uterine cavity hand remaining clots placental tissue membranes found point procedure terminated bleeding time minimal preop hh patient tolerated procedure well taken recovery room good condition

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Postpartum hemorrhage.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Postpartum hemorrhage.,PROCEDURE:, Exam under anesthesia. Removal of intrauterine clots.,ANESTHESIA: , Conscious sedation.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS:, Approximately 200 mL during the procedure, but at least 500 mL prior to that and probably more like 1500 mL prior to that.,COMPLICATIONS: , None.,INDICATIONS AND CONCERNS: , This is a 19-year-old G1, P1 female, status post vaginal delivery, who was being evaluated by the nurse on labor and delivery approximately four hours after her delivery. I was called for persistent bleeding and passing large clots. I examined the patient and found her to have at least 500 mL of clots in her uterus. She was unable to tolerate exam any further than that because of concerns of the amount of bleeding that she had already had and inability to adequately evaluate her. I did advise her that I would recommend they came under anesthesia and dilation and curettage. Risks and benefits of this procedure were discussed with Misty, all of her questions were adequately answered and informed consent was obtained.,PROCEDURE: , The patient was taken to the operating room where satisfactory conscious sedation was performed. She was placed in the dorsal lithotomy position, prepped and draped in the usual fashion. Bimanual exam revealed moderate amount of clot in the uterus. I was able to remove most of the clots with my hands and an attempt at short curettage was performed, but because of contraction of the uterus this was unable to be adequately performed. I was able to thoroughly examine the uterine cavity with my hand and no remaining clots or placental tissue or membranes were found. At this point, the procedure was terminated. Bleeding at this time was minimal. Preop H&H were 8.3 and 24.2. The patient tolerated the procedure well and was taken to the recovery room in good condition. ### Response: Obstetrics / Gynecology, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Prostate cancer.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Prostate cancer.,OPERATION: , Cystoscopy and removal of foreign objects from the urethra.,BRACHYTHERAPY:, Iodine 125.,ANESTHESIA: , General endotracheal. The patient was given Levaquin 500 mg IV preoperatively.,Total seeds were 59. Activity of 0.439, 30 seeds in the periphery with 10 needles and total of 8 seeds at the anterior of the fold, 4 needles. Please note that the total needles placed on the top were actually 38 seeds and 22 seeds were returned back.,BRIEF HISTORY: , This is a 72-year-old male who presented to us with elevated PSA and prostate biopsy with Gleason 6 cancer on the right apex. Options such as watchful waiting, brachytherapy, radical prostatectomy, cryotherapy, and external beam radiation were discussed. Risk of anesthesia, bleeding, infection, pain, MI, DVT, PE, incontinence, erectile dysfunction, urethral stricture, dysuria, burning pain, hematuria, future procedures, and failure of the procedure were all discussed. The patient understood all the risks, benefits, and options and wanted to proceed with the procedure. The patient wanted to wait until he came back from his summer vacations, so a one dose of Zoladex was given. Prostate size measured about 15 g in the OR and about 22 g about two months ago. Consent was obtained.,DETAILS OF THE OPERATION: ,The patient was brought to the OR and anesthesia was applied. The patient was placed in dorsal lithotomy position. The patient had a Foley catheter placed sterilely. The scrotum was taped up using Ioban. Transrectal ultrasound was done. The prostate was measured 15 g. Multiple images were taken. A volume study was done. This was given to the physicist, Dr. X was present who is radiation oncologist who helped with implanting of the seeds. Total of 38 seeds were placed in the patient with 10 peripheral needles and then 4 internal needles. Total of 30 seeds were placed in the periphery and total of 8 seeds were placed in the inside. They were done directly under transrectal ultrasound vision. The seeds were placed directly under ultrasound guidance. There was a nice distribution of the seeds. A couple of more seeds were placed on the right side due to the location of the prostate cancer. Subsequently at the end of the procedure, fluoroscopy was done. Couple of images were obtained. Cystoscopy was done at the end of the procedure where a seed was visualized right in the urethra, which was grasped and pulled out using grasper, which was difficult to get the seed off of the spacers, which was actually pulled out. There were no further seeds visualized in the bladder. The bladder appeared normal. At the end of the procedure, a Foley catheter was kept in place of 18 French and the patient was brought to recovery in stable condition.

preoperative diagnosis prostate cancerpostoperative diagnosis prostate canceroperation cystoscopy removal foreign objects urethrabrachytherapy iodine anesthesia general endotracheal patient given levaquin mg iv preoperativelytotal seeds activity seeds periphery needles total seeds anterior fold needles please note total needles placed top actually seeds seeds returned backbrief history yearold male presented us elevated psa prostate biopsy gleason cancer right apex options watchful waiting brachytherapy radical prostatectomy cryotherapy external beam radiation discussed risk anesthesia bleeding infection pain mi dvt pe incontinence erectile dysfunction urethral stricture dysuria burning pain hematuria future procedures failure procedure discussed patient understood risks benefits options wanted proceed procedure patient wanted wait came back summer vacations one dose zoladex given prostate size measured g g two months ago consent obtaineddetails operation patient brought anesthesia applied patient placed dorsal lithotomy position patient foley catheter placed sterilely scrotum taped using ioban transrectal ultrasound done prostate measured g multiple images taken volume study done given physicist dr x present radiation oncologist helped implanting seeds total seeds placed patient peripheral needles internal needles total seeds placed periphery total seeds placed inside done directly transrectal ultrasound vision seeds placed directly ultrasound guidance nice distribution seeds couple seeds placed right side due location prostate cancer subsequently end procedure fluoroscopy done couple images obtained cystoscopy done end procedure seed visualized right urethra grasped pulled using grasper difficult get seed spacers actually pulled seeds visualized bladder bladder appeared normal end procedure foley catheter kept place french patient brought recovery stable condition

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Prostate cancer.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Prostate cancer.,OPERATION: , Cystoscopy and removal of foreign objects from the urethra.,BRACHYTHERAPY:, Iodine 125.,ANESTHESIA: , General endotracheal. The patient was given Levaquin 500 mg IV preoperatively.,Total seeds were 59. Activity of 0.439, 30 seeds in the periphery with 10 needles and total of 8 seeds at the anterior of the fold, 4 needles. Please note that the total needles placed on the top were actually 38 seeds and 22 seeds were returned back.,BRIEF HISTORY: , This is a 72-year-old male who presented to us with elevated PSA and prostate biopsy with Gleason 6 cancer on the right apex. Options such as watchful waiting, brachytherapy, radical prostatectomy, cryotherapy, and external beam radiation were discussed. Risk of anesthesia, bleeding, infection, pain, MI, DVT, PE, incontinence, erectile dysfunction, urethral stricture, dysuria, burning pain, hematuria, future procedures, and failure of the procedure were all discussed. The patient understood all the risks, benefits, and options and wanted to proceed with the procedure. The patient wanted to wait until he came back from his summer vacations, so a one dose of Zoladex was given. Prostate size measured about 15 g in the OR and about 22 g about two months ago. Consent was obtained.,DETAILS OF THE OPERATION: ,The patient was brought to the OR and anesthesia was applied. The patient was placed in dorsal lithotomy position. The patient had a Foley catheter placed sterilely. The scrotum was taped up using Ioban. Transrectal ultrasound was done. The prostate was measured 15 g. Multiple images were taken. A volume study was done. This was given to the physicist, Dr. X was present who is radiation oncologist who helped with implanting of the seeds. Total of 38 seeds were placed in the patient with 10 peripheral needles and then 4 internal needles. Total of 30 seeds were placed in the periphery and total of 8 seeds were placed in the inside. They were done directly under transrectal ultrasound vision. The seeds were placed directly under ultrasound guidance. There was a nice distribution of the seeds. A couple of more seeds were placed on the right side due to the location of the prostate cancer. Subsequently at the end of the procedure, fluoroscopy was done. Couple of images were obtained. Cystoscopy was done at the end of the procedure where a seed was visualized right in the urethra, which was grasped and pulled out using grasper, which was difficult to get the seed off of the spacers, which was actually pulled out. There were no further seeds visualized in the bladder. The bladder appeared normal. At the end of the procedure, a Foley catheter was kept in place of 18 French and the patient was brought to recovery in stable condition. ### Response: Surgery, Urology

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Pyogenic granuloma, left lateral thigh.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Pyogenic granuloma, left lateral thigh.,ANESTHESIA:, General.,PROCEDURE: , Excision of recurrent pyogenic granuloma.,INDICATIONS: , The patient is 12-year-old young lady, who has a hand-sized congenital vascular malformation on her left lateral thigh below the greater trochanter, which was described by her parents as a birthmark. This congenital cutaneous vascular malformation faded substantially over the first years of her life and has regressed to a flat, slightly hyperpigmented lesion. Although no isolated injury event can be recalled, the patient has developed a pyogenic granuloma next to the distal portion of this lesion on her mid thigh, and it has been treated with topical cautery in her primary care doctor's office, but with recurrence. She is here today for excision.,OPERATIVE FINDINGS: , The patient had what appeared to be a classic pyogenic granuloma arising from this involuted vascular malformation.,DESCRIPTION OF OPERATION: ,The patient came to the operating room, had an uneventful induction of general anesthesia. We conducted a surgical time-out, reiterated her important and unique identifying information and confirmed that the excision of the left thigh pyogenic granuloma was the procedure planned for today. Preparation and draping was __________ ensued with a chlorhexidine based prep solution. The pyogenic granuloma was approximately 6 to 7 mm in greatest dimension and to remove it required creating an elliptical incision of about 1 to 1.2 cm. This entire area was infiltrated with 0.25% Marcaine with dilute epinephrine to provide a wide local field block and then an elliptical incision was made with a #15 scalpel blade, excising the pyogenic granuloma, its base, and a small rim of surrounding normal skin. Some of the abnormal vessels in the dermal and subdermal layer were cauterized with the needle-tip electrocautery pencil. The wound was closed in layers with a deep dermal roll of 5-0 Monocryl stitches supplemented by 5-0 intradermal Monocryl and Steri-Strips for final skin closure. The patient tolerated the procedure well. This nodule was submitted to pathology for confirmation of its histology as a pyogenic granuloma. Blood loss was less than 5 mL and there were no complications.

preoperative diagnosis pyogenic granuloma left lateral thighpostoperative diagnosis pyogenic granuloma left lateral thighanesthesia generalprocedure excision recurrent pyogenic granulomaindications patient yearold young lady handsized congenital vascular malformation left lateral thigh greater trochanter described parents birthmark congenital cutaneous vascular malformation faded substantially first years life regressed flat slightly hyperpigmented lesion although isolated injury event recalled patient developed pyogenic granuloma next distal portion lesion mid thigh treated topical cautery primary care doctors office recurrence today excisionoperative findings patient appeared classic pyogenic granuloma arising involuted vascular malformationdescription operation patient came operating room uneventful induction general anesthesia conducted surgical timeout reiterated important unique identifying information confirmed excision left thigh pyogenic granuloma procedure planned today preparation draping __________ ensued chlorhexidine based prep solution pyogenic granuloma approximately mm greatest dimension remove required creating elliptical incision cm entire area infiltrated marcaine dilute epinephrine provide wide local field block elliptical incision made scalpel blade excising pyogenic granuloma base small rim surrounding normal skin abnormal vessels dermal subdermal layer cauterized needletip electrocautery pencil wound closed layers deep dermal roll monocryl stitches supplemented intradermal monocryl steristrips final skin closure patient tolerated procedure well nodule submitted pathology confirmation histology pyogenic granuloma blood loss less ml complications

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Pyogenic granuloma, left lateral thigh.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Pyogenic granuloma, left lateral thigh.,ANESTHESIA:, General.,PROCEDURE: , Excision of recurrent pyogenic granuloma.,INDICATIONS: , The patient is 12-year-old young lady, who has a hand-sized congenital vascular malformation on her left lateral thigh below the greater trochanter, which was described by her parents as a birthmark. This congenital cutaneous vascular malformation faded substantially over the first years of her life and has regressed to a flat, slightly hyperpigmented lesion. Although no isolated injury event can be recalled, the patient has developed a pyogenic granuloma next to the distal portion of this lesion on her mid thigh, and it has been treated with topical cautery in her primary care doctor's office, but with recurrence. She is here today for excision.,OPERATIVE FINDINGS: , The patient had what appeared to be a classic pyogenic granuloma arising from this involuted vascular malformation.,DESCRIPTION OF OPERATION: ,The patient came to the operating room, had an uneventful induction of general anesthesia. We conducted a surgical time-out, reiterated her important and unique identifying information and confirmed that the excision of the left thigh pyogenic granuloma was the procedure planned for today. Preparation and draping was __________ ensued with a chlorhexidine based prep solution. The pyogenic granuloma was approximately 6 to 7 mm in greatest dimension and to remove it required creating an elliptical incision of about 1 to 1.2 cm. This entire area was infiltrated with 0.25% Marcaine with dilute epinephrine to provide a wide local field block and then an elliptical incision was made with a #15 scalpel blade, excising the pyogenic granuloma, its base, and a small rim of surrounding normal skin. Some of the abnormal vessels in the dermal and subdermal layer were cauterized with the needle-tip electrocautery pencil. The wound was closed in layers with a deep dermal roll of 5-0 Monocryl stitches supplemented by 5-0 intradermal Monocryl and Steri-Strips for final skin closure. The patient tolerated the procedure well. This nodule was submitted to pathology for confirmation of its histology as a pyogenic granuloma. Blood loss was less than 5 mL and there were no complications. ### Response: Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Radioactive plaque macular edema.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Radioactive plaque macular edema.,TITLE OF OPERATION:, Removal of radioactive plaque, right eye with lateral canthotomy.,OPERATIVE PROCEDURE IN DETAIL: , The patient was prepped and draped in the usual manner for a local eye procedure. Then a retrobulbar injection of 2% Xylocaine was performed. A lid speculum was applied and the conjunctiva was opened 4 mm from the limbus. A 2-0 traction suture was passed around the insertion of the lateral rectus and the temporal one-half of the globe was exposed. Next, the plaque was identified and the two scleral sutures were removed. The plaque was gently extracted and the conjunctiva was re-sutured with 6-0 catgut, following removal of the traction suture. The fundus was inspected with direct ophthalmoscopy. An eye patch was applied following Neosporin solution irrigation. The patient was sent to the recovery room in good condition. A lateral canthotomy had been done.

preoperative diagnosis radioactive plaque macular edemapostoperative diagnosis radioactive plaque macular edematitle operation removal radioactive plaque right eye lateral canthotomyoperative procedure detail patient prepped draped usual manner local eye procedure retrobulbar injection xylocaine performed lid speculum applied conjunctiva opened mm limbus traction suture passed around insertion lateral rectus temporal onehalf globe exposed next plaque identified two scleral sutures removed plaque gently extracted conjunctiva resutured catgut following removal traction suture fundus inspected direct ophthalmoscopy eye patch applied following neosporin solution irrigation patient sent recovery room good condition lateral canthotomy done

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Radioactive plaque macular edema.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Radioactive plaque macular edema.,TITLE OF OPERATION:, Removal of radioactive plaque, right eye with lateral canthotomy.,OPERATIVE PROCEDURE IN DETAIL: , The patient was prepped and draped in the usual manner for a local eye procedure. Then a retrobulbar injection of 2% Xylocaine was performed. A lid speculum was applied and the conjunctiva was opened 4 mm from the limbus. A 2-0 traction suture was passed around the insertion of the lateral rectus and the temporal one-half of the globe was exposed. Next, the plaque was identified and the two scleral sutures were removed. The plaque was gently extracted and the conjunctiva was re-sutured with 6-0 catgut, following removal of the traction suture. The fundus was inspected with direct ophthalmoscopy. An eye patch was applied following Neosporin solution irrigation. The patient was sent to the recovery room in good condition. A lateral canthotomy had been done. ### Response: Ophthalmology, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Recurrent anterior dislocating left shoulder.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Recurrent anterior dislocating left shoulder.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED:, Arthroscopic debridement of the left shoulder with attempted arthroscopic Bankart repair followed by open Bankart arthroplasty of the left shoulder.,PROCEDURE: ,The patient was taken to OR #2, administered general anesthetic after ineffective interscalene block had been administered in the preop area. The patient was positioned in the modified beachchair position utilizing the Mayfield headrest. The left shoulder was propped posteriorly with a rolled towel. His head was secured to the Mayfield headrest. The left shoulder and upper extremity were then prepped and draped in the usual manner. A posterior lateral port was made for _____ the arthroscopic cannula. The scope was introduced into the glenohumeral joint. There was noted to be a complete tear of the anterior glenoid labrum off from superiorly at about 11:30 extending down inferiorly to about 6 o'clock. The labrum was adherent to the underlying capsule. The margin of the glenoid was frayed in this area. The biceps tendon was noted to be intact. The articular surface of the glenoid was fairly well preserved. The articular surface on the humeral head was intact; however, there was a large Hill-Sachs lesion on the posterolateral aspect of the humeral head. The rotator cuff was visualized and noted to be intact. The axillary pouch was visualized and it was free of injury. There were some cartilaginous fragments within the axillary pouch. Attention was first directed after making an anterior portal to fixation of the anterior glenoid labrum. Utilizing the Chirotech system through the anterior cannula, the labrum was secured with the pin and drill component and was then tacked back to the superior glenoid rim at about the 11 o'clock position. A second tack was then placed at about the 8 o'clock position. The labrum was then probed and was noted to be stable. With some general ranging of the shoulder, the tissue was pulled out from the tacks. An attempt was made at placement of two other tacks; however, the tissue was not of good quality to be held in position. Therefore, all tacks were either buried down to a flat surface or were removed from the anterior glenoid area. At this point, it was deemed that an open Bankart arthroplasty was necessary. The arthroscopic instruments were removed. An anterior incision was made extending from just lateral of the coracoid down toward the axillary fold. The skin incision was taken down through the skin. Subcutaneous tissues were then separated with the coag Bovie to provide hemostasis. The deltopectoral fascia was identified. It was split at the deltopectoral interval and the deltoid was reflected laterally. The subdeltoid bursa was then removed with rongeurs. The conjoint tendon was identified. The deltoid and conjoint tendons were then retracted with a self-retaining retractor. The subscapularis tendon was identified. It was separated about a centimeter from its insertion, leaving the tissue to do sew later. The subscapularis was reflected off superiorly and inferiorly and the muscle retracted medially. This allowed for visualization of the capsule. The capsule was split near the humeral head insertion leaving a tag for repair. It was then split longitudinally towards the glenoid at approximately 9 o'clock position. This provided visualization of the glenohumeral joint. The friable labral and capsular tissue was identified. The glenoid neck was already prepared for suturing, therefore, three Mitek suture anchors were then positioned to place at approximately 7 o'clock, 9 o'clock, and 10 o'clock. The sutures were passed through the labral capsular tissue and tied securely. At this point, the anterior glenoid rim had been recreated. The joint was then copiously irrigated with gentamicin solution and suctioned dry. The capsule was then repaired with interrupted #1 Vicryl suture and repaired back to its insertion site with #1 Vicryl suture. This later was then copiously irrigated with gentamicin solution and suctioned dry. Subscapularis was reapproximated on to the lesser tuberosity of the humerus utilizing interrupted #1 Vicryl suture. This later was then copiously irrigated as well and suctioned dry. The deltoid fascia was approximated with running #2-0 Vicryl suture. Subcutaneous tissues were approximated with interrupted #2-0 Vicryl and the skin was approximated with a running #4-0 subcuticular Vicryl followed by placement of Steri-Strips. 0.25% Marcaine was placed in the subcutaneous area for postoperative analgesia. The patient was then placed in a shoulder immobilizer after a bulky dressing had been applied. The patient was then transferred to the recovery room in apparent satisfactory condition.

preoperative diagnosis recurrent anterior dislocating left shoulderpostoperative diagnosis recurrent anterior dislocating left shoulderprocedure performed arthroscopic debridement left shoulder attempted arthroscopic bankart repair followed open bankart arthroplasty left shoulderprocedure patient taken administered general anesthetic ineffective interscalene block administered preop area patient positioned modified beachchair position utilizing mayfield headrest left shoulder propped posteriorly rolled towel head secured mayfield headrest left shoulder upper extremity prepped draped usual manner posterior lateral port made _____ arthroscopic cannula scope introduced glenohumeral joint noted complete tear anterior glenoid labrum superiorly extending inferiorly oclock labrum adherent underlying capsule margin glenoid frayed area biceps tendon noted intact articular surface glenoid fairly well preserved articular surface humeral head intact however large hillsachs lesion posterolateral aspect humeral head rotator cuff visualized noted intact axillary pouch visualized free injury cartilaginous fragments within axillary pouch attention first directed making anterior portal fixation anterior glenoid labrum utilizing chirotech system anterior cannula labrum secured pin drill component tacked back superior glenoid rim oclock position second tack placed oclock position labrum probed noted stable general ranging shoulder tissue pulled tacks attempt made placement two tacks however tissue good quality held position therefore tacks either buried flat surface removed anterior glenoid area point deemed open bankart arthroplasty necessary arthroscopic instruments removed anterior incision made extending lateral coracoid toward axillary fold skin incision taken skin subcutaneous tissues separated coag bovie provide hemostasis deltopectoral fascia identified split deltopectoral interval deltoid reflected laterally subdeltoid bursa removed rongeurs conjoint tendon identified deltoid conjoint tendons retracted selfretaining retractor subscapularis tendon identified separated centimeter insertion leaving tissue sew later subscapularis reflected superiorly inferiorly muscle retracted medially allowed visualization capsule capsule split near humeral head insertion leaving tag repair split longitudinally towards glenoid approximately oclock position provided visualization glenohumeral joint friable labral capsular tissue identified glenoid neck already prepared suturing therefore three mitek suture anchors positioned place approximately oclock oclock oclock sutures passed labral capsular tissue tied securely point anterior glenoid rim recreated joint copiously irrigated gentamicin solution suctioned dry capsule repaired interrupted vicryl suture repaired back insertion site vicryl suture later copiously irrigated gentamicin solution suctioned dry subscapularis reapproximated lesser tuberosity humerus utilizing interrupted vicryl suture later copiously irrigated well suctioned dry deltoid fascia approximated running vicryl suture subcutaneous tissues approximated interrupted vicryl skin approximated running subcuticular vicryl followed placement steristrips marcaine placed subcutaneous area postoperative analgesia patient placed shoulder immobilizer bulky dressing applied patient transferred recovery room apparent satisfactory condition

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Recurrent anterior dislocating left shoulder.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Recurrent anterior dislocating left shoulder.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED:, Arthroscopic debridement of the left shoulder with attempted arthroscopic Bankart repair followed by open Bankart arthroplasty of the left shoulder.,PROCEDURE: ,The patient was taken to OR #2, administered general anesthetic after ineffective interscalene block had been administered in the preop area. The patient was positioned in the modified beachchair position utilizing the Mayfield headrest. The left shoulder was propped posteriorly with a rolled towel. His head was secured to the Mayfield headrest. The left shoulder and upper extremity were then prepped and draped in the usual manner. A posterior lateral port was made for _____ the arthroscopic cannula. The scope was introduced into the glenohumeral joint. There was noted to be a complete tear of the anterior glenoid labrum off from superiorly at about 11:30 extending down inferiorly to about 6 o'clock. The labrum was adherent to the underlying capsule. The margin of the glenoid was frayed in this area. The biceps tendon was noted to be intact. The articular surface of the glenoid was fairly well preserved. The articular surface on the humeral head was intact; however, there was a large Hill-Sachs lesion on the posterolateral aspect of the humeral head. The rotator cuff was visualized and noted to be intact. The axillary pouch was visualized and it was free of injury. There were some cartilaginous fragments within the axillary pouch. Attention was first directed after making an anterior portal to fixation of the anterior glenoid labrum. Utilizing the Chirotech system through the anterior cannula, the labrum was secured with the pin and drill component and was then tacked back to the superior glenoid rim at about the 11 o'clock position. A second tack was then placed at about the 8 o'clock position. The labrum was then probed and was noted to be stable. With some general ranging of the shoulder, the tissue was pulled out from the tacks. An attempt was made at placement of two other tacks; however, the tissue was not of good quality to be held in position. Therefore, all tacks were either buried down to a flat surface or were removed from the anterior glenoid area. At this point, it was deemed that an open Bankart arthroplasty was necessary. The arthroscopic instruments were removed. An anterior incision was made extending from just lateral of the coracoid down toward the axillary fold. The skin incision was taken down through the skin. Subcutaneous tissues were then separated with the coag Bovie to provide hemostasis. The deltopectoral fascia was identified. It was split at the deltopectoral interval and the deltoid was reflected laterally. The subdeltoid bursa was then removed with rongeurs. The conjoint tendon was identified. The deltoid and conjoint tendons were then retracted with a self-retaining retractor. The subscapularis tendon was identified. It was separated about a centimeter from its insertion, leaving the tissue to do sew later. The subscapularis was reflected off superiorly and inferiorly and the muscle retracted medially. This allowed for visualization of the capsule. The capsule was split near the humeral head insertion leaving a tag for repair. It was then split longitudinally towards the glenoid at approximately 9 o'clock position. This provided visualization of the glenohumeral joint. The friable labral and capsular tissue was identified. The glenoid neck was already prepared for suturing, therefore, three Mitek suture anchors were then positioned to place at approximately 7 o'clock, 9 o'clock, and 10 o'clock. The sutures were passed through the labral capsular tissue and tied securely. At this point, the anterior glenoid rim had been recreated. The joint was then copiously irrigated with gentamicin solution and suctioned dry. The capsule was then repaired with interrupted #1 Vicryl suture and repaired back to its insertion site with #1 Vicryl suture. This later was then copiously irrigated with gentamicin solution and suctioned dry. Subscapularis was reapproximated on to the lesser tuberosity of the humerus utilizing interrupted #1 Vicryl suture. This later was then copiously irrigated as well and suctioned dry. The deltoid fascia was approximated with running #2-0 Vicryl suture. Subcutaneous tissues were approximated with interrupted #2-0 Vicryl and the skin was approximated with a running #4-0 subcuticular Vicryl followed by placement of Steri-Strips. 0.25% Marcaine was placed in the subcutaneous area for postoperative analgesia. The patient was then placed in a shoulder immobilizer after a bulky dressing had been applied. The patient was then transferred to the recovery room in apparent satisfactory condition. ### Response: Orthopedic, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Recurrent bladder tumors.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Recurrent bladder tumors.,OPERATION: , Cystoscopy, TUR, and electrofulguration of recurrent bladder tumors.,ANESTHESIA:, General.,INDICATIONS: , A 79-year-old woman with recurrent bladder tumors of the bladder neck.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: ,The patient was brought to the operating room, prepped and draped in lithotomy position under satisfactory general anesthesia. A #21-French cystourethroscope was inserted into the bladder. Examination of the bladder showed approximately a 3-cm area of erythema and recurrent papillomatosis just above and lateral to the left ureteral orifice. No other lesions were noted. Using a cold punch biopsy forceps, a random biopsy was obtained. The entire area was electrofulgurated using the Bugbee electrode. The patient tolerated the procedure well and left the operating room in satisfactory condition.

preoperative diagnosis recurrent bladder tumorspostoperative diagnosis recurrent bladder tumorsoperation cystoscopy tur electrofulguration recurrent bladder tumorsanesthesia generalindications yearold woman recurrent bladder tumors bladder neckdescription procedure patient brought operating room prepped draped lithotomy position satisfactory general anesthesia french cystourethroscope inserted bladder examination bladder showed approximately cm area erythema recurrent papillomatosis lateral left ureteral orifice lesions noted using cold punch biopsy forceps random biopsy obtained entire area electrofulgurated using bugbee electrode patient tolerated procedure well left operating room satisfactory condition

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Recurrent bladder tumors.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Recurrent bladder tumors.,OPERATION: , Cystoscopy, TUR, and electrofulguration of recurrent bladder tumors.,ANESTHESIA:, General.,INDICATIONS: , A 79-year-old woman with recurrent bladder tumors of the bladder neck.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: ,The patient was brought to the operating room, prepped and draped in lithotomy position under satisfactory general anesthesia. A #21-French cystourethroscope was inserted into the bladder. Examination of the bladder showed approximately a 3-cm area of erythema and recurrent papillomatosis just above and lateral to the left ureteral orifice. No other lesions were noted. Using a cold punch biopsy forceps, a random biopsy was obtained. The entire area was electrofulgurated using the Bugbee electrode. The patient tolerated the procedure well and left the operating room in satisfactory condition. ### Response: Surgery, Urology

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Recurrent degenerative spondylolisthesis and stenosis at L4-5 and L5-S1 with L3 compression fracture adjacent to an instrumented fusion from T11 through L2 with hardware malfunction distal at the L2 end of the hardware fixation.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Recurrent degenerative spondylolisthesis and stenosis at L4-5 and L5-S1 with L3 compression fracture adjacent to an instrumented fusion from T11 through L2 with hardware malfunction distal at the L2 end of the hardware fixation.,PROCEDURE: , Lumbar re-exploration for removal of fractured internal fixation plate from T11 through L2 followed by a repositioning of the L2 pedicle screws and evaluation of the fusion from T11 through L2 followed by a bilateral hemilaminectomy and diskectomy for decompression at L4-5 and L5-S1 with posterior lumbar interbody fusion using morselized autograft bone and the synthetic spacers from the Capstone system at L4-5 and L5-S1 followed by placement of the pedicle screw fixation devices at L3, L4, L5, and S1 and insertion of a 20 cm fixation plate that range from the T11 through S1 levels and then subsequent onlay fusion using morselized autograft bone and bone morphogenetic soaked sponge at L1-2 and then at L3-L4, L4-L5, and L5-S1 bilaterally.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: ,This is a 68-year-old lady who presents with a history of osteomyelitis associated with the percutaneous vertebroplasty that was actually treated several months ago with removal of the infected vertebral augmentation and placement of a posterior pedicle screw plate fixation device from T11 through L2. She subsequently actually done reasonably well until about a month ago when she developed progressive severe intractable pain. Imaging study showed that the distal hardware at the plate itself had fractured consistent with incomplete fusion across her osteomyelitis area. There was no evidence of infection on the imaging or with her laboratory studies. In addition, she developed a pretty profound stenosis at L4-L5 and L5-S1 that appeared to be recurrent as well. She now presents for revision of her hardware, extension of fusion, and decompression.,The patient was brought to the operating room, placed under satisfactory general endotracheal anesthesia. She was placed on the operative table in the prone position. Back was prepared with Betadine, iodine, and alcohol. We elliptically excised her old incision and extended this caudally so that we had access from the existing hardware fixation all the way down to her sacrum. The locking nuts were removed from the screw post and both plates refractured or significantly weakened and had a crease in it. After these were removed, it was obvious that the bottom screws were somewhat loosened in the pedicle zone so we actually tightened one up and that fit good snugly into the nail when we redirected so that it actually reamed up into the upper aspect of the vertebral body in much more secure purchase. We then dressed the L4-L5 and L5-S1 levels which were profoundly stenotic. This was a combination of scar and overgrown bone. She had previously undergone bilateral hemilaminectomies at L4-5 so we removed scar bone and actually cleaned and significantly decompressed the dura at both of these levels. After completing this, we inserted the Capstone interbody spacer filled with morselized autograft bone and some BMP sponge into the disk space at both levels. We used 10 x 32 mm spacers at both L4-L5 and L5-S1. This corrected the deformity and helped to preserve the correction of the stenosis and then after we cannulated the pedicles of L4, L5 and S1 tightened the pedicle screws in L3. This allowed us to actually seat a 20 cm plate contoured to the lumbar lordosis onto the pedicle screws all the way from S1 up to the T11 level. Once we placed the plate onto the screws and locked them in position, we then packed the remaining BMP sponge and morselized autograft bone through the plate around the incomplete fracture healing at the L1 level and then dorsolaterally at L4-L5 and L5-S1 and L3-L4, again the goal being to create a dorsal fusion and enhance the interbody fusion as well. The wound was then irrigated copiously with bacitracin solution and then we closed in layers using #1 Vicryl in muscle and fascia, 3-0 in subcutaneous tissue and approximated staples in the skin. Prior to closing the skin, we confirmed correct sponge and needle count. We placed a drain in the extrafascial space and then confirmed that there were no other foreign bodies. The Cell Saver blood was recycled and she was given two units of packed red blood cells as well. I was present for and performed the entire procedure myself or supervised.

preoperative diagnosis recurrent degenerative spondylolisthesis stenosis l ls l compression fracture adjacent instrumented fusion l hardware malfunction distal l end hardware fixationpostoperative diagnosis recurrent degenerative spondylolisthesis stenosis l ls l compression fracture adjacent instrumented fusion l hardware malfunction distal l end hardware fixationprocedure lumbar reexploration removal fractured internal fixation plate l followed repositioning l pedicle screws evaluation fusion l followed bilateral hemilaminectomy diskectomy decompression l ls posterior lumbar interbody fusion using morselized autograft bone synthetic spacers capstone system l ls followed placement pedicle screw fixation devices l l l insertion cm fixation plate range levels subsequent onlay fusion using morselized autograft bone bone morphogenetic soaked sponge l ls bilaterallydescription procedure yearold lady presents history osteomyelitis associated percutaneous vertebroplasty actually treated several months ago removal infected vertebral augmentation placement posterior pedicle screw plate fixation device l subsequently actually done reasonably well month ago developed progressive severe intractable pain imaging study showed distal hardware plate fractured consistent incomplete fusion across osteomyelitis area evidence infection imaging laboratory studies addition developed pretty profound stenosis ls appeared recurrent well presents revision hardware extension fusion decompressionthe patient brought operating room placed satisfactory general endotracheal anesthesia placed operative table prone position back prepared betadine iodine alcohol elliptically excised old incision extended caudally access existing hardware fixation way sacrum locking nuts removed screw post plates refractured significantly weakened crease removed obvious bottom screws somewhat loosened pedicle zone actually tightened one fit good snugly nail redirected actually reamed upper aspect vertebral body much secure purchase dressed ls levels profoundly stenotic combination scar overgrown bone previously undergone bilateral hemilaminectomies l removed scar bone actually cleaned significantly decompressed dura levels completing inserted capstone interbody spacer filled morselized autograft bone bmp sponge disk space levels used x mm spacers ls corrected deformity helped preserve correction stenosis cannulated pedicles l l tightened pedicle screws l allowed us actually seat cm plate contoured lumbar lordosis onto pedicle screws way level placed plate onto screws locked position packed remaining bmp sponge morselized autograft bone plate around incomplete fracture healing l level dorsolaterally ls goal create dorsal fusion enhance interbody fusion well wound irrigated copiously bacitracin solution closed layers using vicryl muscle fascia subcutaneous tissue approximated staples skin prior closing skin confirmed correct sponge needle count placed drain extrafascial space confirmed foreign bodies cell saver blood recycled given two units packed red blood cells well present performed entire procedure supervised

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Recurrent degenerative spondylolisthesis and stenosis at L4-5 and L5-S1 with L3 compression fracture adjacent to an instrumented fusion from T11 through L2 with hardware malfunction distal at the L2 end of the hardware fixation.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Recurrent degenerative spondylolisthesis and stenosis at L4-5 and L5-S1 with L3 compression fracture adjacent to an instrumented fusion from T11 through L2 with hardware malfunction distal at the L2 end of the hardware fixation.,PROCEDURE: , Lumbar re-exploration for removal of fractured internal fixation plate from T11 through L2 followed by a repositioning of the L2 pedicle screws and evaluation of the fusion from T11 through L2 followed by a bilateral hemilaminectomy and diskectomy for decompression at L4-5 and L5-S1 with posterior lumbar interbody fusion using morselized autograft bone and the synthetic spacers from the Capstone system at L4-5 and L5-S1 followed by placement of the pedicle screw fixation devices at L3, L4, L5, and S1 and insertion of a 20 cm fixation plate that range from the T11 through S1 levels and then subsequent onlay fusion using morselized autograft bone and bone morphogenetic soaked sponge at L1-2 and then at L3-L4, L4-L5, and L5-S1 bilaterally.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: ,This is a 68-year-old lady who presents with a history of osteomyelitis associated with the percutaneous vertebroplasty that was actually treated several months ago with removal of the infected vertebral augmentation and placement of a posterior pedicle screw plate fixation device from T11 through L2. She subsequently actually done reasonably well until about a month ago when she developed progressive severe intractable pain. Imaging study showed that the distal hardware at the plate itself had fractured consistent with incomplete fusion across her osteomyelitis area. There was no evidence of infection on the imaging or with her laboratory studies. In addition, she developed a pretty profound stenosis at L4-L5 and L5-S1 that appeared to be recurrent as well. She now presents for revision of her hardware, extension of fusion, and decompression.,The patient was brought to the operating room, placed under satisfactory general endotracheal anesthesia. She was placed on the operative table in the prone position. Back was prepared with Betadine, iodine, and alcohol. We elliptically excised her old incision and extended this caudally so that we had access from the existing hardware fixation all the way down to her sacrum. The locking nuts were removed from the screw post and both plates refractured or significantly weakened and had a crease in it. After these were removed, it was obvious that the bottom screws were somewhat loosened in the pedicle zone so we actually tightened one up and that fit good snugly into the nail when we redirected so that it actually reamed up into the upper aspect of the vertebral body in much more secure purchase. We then dressed the L4-L5 and L5-S1 levels which were profoundly stenotic. This was a combination of scar and overgrown bone. She had previously undergone bilateral hemilaminectomies at L4-5 so we removed scar bone and actually cleaned and significantly decompressed the dura at both of these levels. After completing this, we inserted the Capstone interbody spacer filled with morselized autograft bone and some BMP sponge into the disk space at both levels. We used 10 x 32 mm spacers at both L4-L5 and L5-S1. This corrected the deformity and helped to preserve the correction of the stenosis and then after we cannulated the pedicles of L4, L5 and S1 tightened the pedicle screws in L3. This allowed us to actually seat a 20 cm plate contoured to the lumbar lordosis onto the pedicle screws all the way from S1 up to the T11 level. Once we placed the plate onto the screws and locked them in position, we then packed the remaining BMP sponge and morselized autograft bone through the plate around the incomplete fracture healing at the L1 level and then dorsolaterally at L4-L5 and L5-S1 and L3-L4, again the goal being to create a dorsal fusion and enhance the interbody fusion as well. The wound was then irrigated copiously with bacitracin solution and then we closed in layers using #1 Vicryl in muscle and fascia, 3-0 in subcutaneous tissue and approximated staples in the skin. Prior to closing the skin, we confirmed correct sponge and needle count. We placed a drain in the extrafascial space and then confirmed that there were no other foreign bodies. The Cell Saver blood was recycled and she was given two units of packed red blood cells as well. I was present for and performed the entire procedure myself or supervised. ### Response: Neurosurgery, Orthopedic, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Recurrent dysplasia of vulva.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Same.,OPERATION PERFORMED:, Carbon dioxide laser photo-ablation.,ANESTHESIA: , General, laryngeal mask.,INDICATIONS FOR PROCEDURE: , The patient has a past history of recurrent vulvar dysplasia. She has had multiple prior procedures for treatment. She was counseled to undergo laser photo-ablation.,FINDINGS:, Examination under anesthesia revealed several slightly raised and pigmented lesions, predominantly on the left labia and perianal regions. After staining with acetic acid, several additional areas of acetowhite epithelium were seen on both sides and in the perianal region.,PROCEDURE: ,The patient was brought to the operating room with an IV in place. Anesthetic was administered, after which she was placed in the lithotomy position. Examination under anesthesia was performed, after which she was prepped and draped. Acetic acid was applied and marking pen was utilized to outline the extent of the dysplastic lesion. The carbon dioxide laser was then used to ablate the lesion to the third surgical plane as defined Reid. Setting was 25 watts using a 6 mm pattern size with the silk-touch hand piece in the paint mode. Excellent hemostasis was noted and Bacitracin was applied prophylactically. The patient was awakened from her anesthetic and taken to the Post Anesthesia Care Unit in stable condition.

preoperative diagnosis recurrent dysplasia vulvapostoperative diagnosis sameoperation performed carbon dioxide laser photoablationanesthesia general laryngeal maskindications procedure patient past history recurrent vulvar dysplasia multiple prior procedures treatment counseled undergo laser photoablationfindings examination anesthesia revealed several slightly raised pigmented lesions predominantly left labia perianal regions staining acetic acid several additional areas acetowhite epithelium seen sides perianal regionprocedure patient brought operating room iv place anesthetic administered placed lithotomy position examination anesthesia performed prepped draped acetic acid applied marking pen utilized outline extent dysplastic lesion carbon dioxide laser used ablate lesion third surgical plane defined reid setting watts using mm pattern size silktouch hand piece paint mode excellent hemostasis noted bacitracin applied prophylactically patient awakened anesthetic taken post anesthesia care unit stable condition

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Recurrent dysplasia of vulva.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Same.,OPERATION PERFORMED:, Carbon dioxide laser photo-ablation.,ANESTHESIA: , General, laryngeal mask.,INDICATIONS FOR PROCEDURE: , The patient has a past history of recurrent vulvar dysplasia. She has had multiple prior procedures for treatment. She was counseled to undergo laser photo-ablation.,FINDINGS:, Examination under anesthesia revealed several slightly raised and pigmented lesions, predominantly on the left labia and perianal regions. After staining with acetic acid, several additional areas of acetowhite epithelium were seen on both sides and in the perianal region.,PROCEDURE: ,The patient was brought to the operating room with an IV in place. Anesthetic was administered, after which she was placed in the lithotomy position. Examination under anesthesia was performed, after which she was prepped and draped. Acetic acid was applied and marking pen was utilized to outline the extent of the dysplastic lesion. The carbon dioxide laser was then used to ablate the lesion to the third surgical plane as defined Reid. Setting was 25 watts using a 6 mm pattern size with the silk-touch hand piece in the paint mode. Excellent hemostasis was noted and Bacitracin was applied prophylactically. The patient was awakened from her anesthetic and taken to the Post Anesthesia Care Unit in stable condition. ### Response: Obstetrics / Gynecology, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Recurrent re-infected sebaceous cyst of abdomen.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSES:,1. Abscess secondary to retained foreign body.,2. Incisional hernia.,PROCEDURES,1. Excision of abscess, removal of foreign body.,2. Repair of incisional hernia.,ANESTHESIA: , LMA.,INDICATIONS: , Patient is a pleasant 37-year-old gentleman who has had multiple procedures including a laparotomy related to trauma. The patient has had a recurrently infected cyst of his mass at the superior aspect of his incision, which he says gets larger and then it drains internally, causing him to be quite ill. He presented to my office and I recommended that he undergo exploration of this area and removal. The procedure, purpose, risks, expected benefits, potential complications, and alternative forms of therapy were discussed with him and he was agreeable to surgery.,FINDINGS:, The patient was found upon excision of the cyst that it contained a large Prolene suture, which is multiply knotted as it always is; beneath this was a very small incisional hernia, the hernia cavity, which contained omentum; the hernia was easily repaired.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: , The patient was identified, then taken into the operating room, where after induction of an LMA anesthetic, his abdomen was prepped with Betadine solution and draped in sterile fashion. The puncta of the wound lesion was infiltrated with methylene blue and peroxide. The lesion was excised and the existing scar was excised using an ellipse and using a tenotomy scissors, the cyst was excised down to its base. In doing so, we identified a large Prolene suture within the wound and followed this cyst down to its base at which time we found that it contained omentum and was in fact overlying a small incisional hernia. The cyst was removed in its entirety, divided from the omentum using a Metzenbaum and tying with 2-0 silk ties. The hernia repair was undertaken with interrupted 0 Vicryl suture with simple sutures. The wound was then irrigated and closed with 3-0 Vicryl subcutaneous and 4-0 Vicryl subcuticular and Steri-Strips. Patient tolerated the procedure well. Dressings were applied and he was taken to recovery room in stable condition.

preoperative diagnosis recurrent reinfected sebaceous cyst abdomenpostoperative diagnoses abscess secondary retained foreign body incisional herniaprocedures excision abscess removal foreign body repair incisional herniaanesthesia lmaindications patient pleasant yearold gentleman multiple procedures including laparotomy related trauma patient recurrently infected cyst mass superior aspect incision says gets larger drains internally causing quite ill presented office recommended undergo exploration area removal procedure purpose risks expected benefits potential complications alternative forms therapy discussed agreeable surgeryfindings patient found upon excision cyst contained large prolene suture multiply knotted always beneath small incisional hernia hernia cavity contained omentum hernia easily repaireddescription procedure patient identified taken operating room induction lma anesthetic abdomen prepped betadine solution draped sterile fashion puncta wound lesion infiltrated methylene blue peroxide lesion excised existing scar excised using ellipse using tenotomy scissors cyst excised base identified large prolene suture within wound followed cyst base time found contained omentum fact overlying small incisional hernia cyst removed entirety divided omentum using metzenbaum tying silk ties hernia repair undertaken interrupted vicryl suture simple sutures wound irrigated closed vicryl subcutaneous vicryl subcuticular steristrips patient tolerated procedure well dressings applied taken recovery room stable condition

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Recurrent re-infected sebaceous cyst of abdomen.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSES:,1. Abscess secondary to retained foreign body.,2. Incisional hernia.,PROCEDURES,1. Excision of abscess, removal of foreign body.,2. Repair of incisional hernia.,ANESTHESIA: , LMA.,INDICATIONS: , Patient is a pleasant 37-year-old gentleman who has had multiple procedures including a laparotomy related to trauma. The patient has had a recurrently infected cyst of his mass at the superior aspect of his incision, which he says gets larger and then it drains internally, causing him to be quite ill. He presented to my office and I recommended that he undergo exploration of this area and removal. The procedure, purpose, risks, expected benefits, potential complications, and alternative forms of therapy were discussed with him and he was agreeable to surgery.,FINDINGS:, The patient was found upon excision of the cyst that it contained a large Prolene suture, which is multiply knotted as it always is; beneath this was a very small incisional hernia, the hernia cavity, which contained omentum; the hernia was easily repaired.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: , The patient was identified, then taken into the operating room, where after induction of an LMA anesthetic, his abdomen was prepped with Betadine solution and draped in sterile fashion. The puncta of the wound lesion was infiltrated with methylene blue and peroxide. The lesion was excised and the existing scar was excised using an ellipse and using a tenotomy scissors, the cyst was excised down to its base. In doing so, we identified a large Prolene suture within the wound and followed this cyst down to its base at which time we found that it contained omentum and was in fact overlying a small incisional hernia. The cyst was removed in its entirety, divided from the omentum using a Metzenbaum and tying with 2-0 silk ties. The hernia repair was undertaken with interrupted 0 Vicryl suture with simple sutures. The wound was then irrigated and closed with 3-0 Vicryl subcutaneous and 4-0 Vicryl subcuticular and Steri-Strips. Patient tolerated the procedure well. Dressings were applied and he was taken to recovery room in stable condition. ### Response: Gastroenterology, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Recurrent right inguinal hernia, as well as phimosis.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Recurrent right inguinal hernia, as well as phimosis.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED: , Laparoscopic right inguinal herniorrhaphy with mesh, as well as a circumcision.,ANESTHESIA: , General endotracheal.,COMPLICATIONS: , None.,DISPOSITION: , The patient tolerated the procedure well and was transferred to recovery room in stable condition.,SPECIMEN: , Foreskin.,BRIEF HISTORY: , This patient is a 66-year-old African-American male who presented to Dr. Y's office with recurrent right inguinal hernia for the second time requesting hernia repair. The procedure was discussed with the patient and the patient opted for laparoscopic repair due to multiple attempts at the open inguinal repair on the right. The patient also is requesting circumcision with phimosis at the same operating time setting.,INTRAOPERATIVE FINDINGS: , The patient was found to have a right inguinal hernia with omentum and bowel within the hernia, which was easily reduced. The patient was also found to have a phimosis, which was easily removed.,PROCEDURE:, After informed consent, the risks and benefits of the procedure were explained to the patient. The patient was brought to operating suite, after general endotracheal intubation, prepped and draped in the normal sterile fashion. An infraumbilical incision was made with a #15 Bard-Parker scalpel. The umbilical skin was elevated with a towel clip and the Veress needle was inserted without difficulty. Saline drop test proved entrance into the abdominal cavity and then the abdomen was insufflated to sufficient pressure of 15 mmHg. Next, the Veress was removed and #10 bladed trocar was inserted without difficulty. The 30-degree camera laparoscope was then inserted and the abdomen was explored. There was evidence of a large right inguinal hernia, which had omentum as well as bowel within it, easily reducible. Attention was next made to placing a #12 port in the right upper quadrant, four fingerbreadths from the umbilicus. Again, a skin was made with a #15 blade scalpel and the #12 port was inserted under direct visualization. A #5 port was inserted in the left upper quadrant in similar fashion without difficulty under direct visualization. Next, a grasper with blunt dissector was used to reduce the hernia and withdraw the sac and using an Endoshears, the peritoneum was scored towards the midline and towards the medial umbilical ligament and lateral. The peritoneum was then spread using the blunt dissector, opening up and identifying the iliopubic tract, which was identified without difficulty. Dissection was carried out, freeing up the hernia sac from the peritoneum. This was done without difficulty reducing the hernia in its entirety. Attention was next made to placing a piece of Prolene mesh, it was placed through the #12 port and placed into the desired position, stapled into place in its medial aspect via the 4 mm staples along the iliopubic tract. The 4.8 mm staples were then used to staple the superior edge of the mesh just below the peritoneum and then the patient was re-peritonealized, re-approximating edge of the perineum with the 4.8 mm staples. This was done without difficulty. All three ports were removed under direct visualization. No evidence of bleeding and the #10 and #12 mm ports were closed with #0-Vicryl and UR6 needle. Skin was closed with running subcuticular #4-0 undyed Vicryl. Steri-Strips and sterile dressings were applied. Attention was next made to carrying out the circumcision. The foreskin was retracted back over the penis head. The desired amount of removing foreskin was marked out with a skin marker. The foreskin was then put on tension using a clamp to protect the penis head. A #15 blade scalpel was used to remove the foreskin and sending off as specimen. This was done without difficulty. Next, the remaining edges were retracted, hemostasis was obtained with Bovie electrocautery and the skin edges were re-approximated with #2-0 plain gut in simple interrupted fashion and circumferentially. This was done without difficulty maintaining hemostasis.,A petroleum jelly was applied with a Coban dressing. The patient tolerated this procedure well and was well and was transferred to recovery after extubation in stable condition.

preoperative diagnosis recurrent right inguinal hernia well phimosispostoperative diagnosis recurrent right inguinal hernia well phimosisprocedure performed laparoscopic right inguinal herniorrhaphy mesh well circumcisionanesthesia general endotrachealcomplications nonedisposition patient tolerated procedure well transferred recovery room stable conditionspecimen foreskinbrief history patient yearold africanamerican male presented dr ys office recurrent right inguinal hernia second time requesting hernia repair procedure discussed patient patient opted laparoscopic repair due multiple attempts open inguinal repair right patient also requesting circumcision phimosis operating time settingintraoperative findings patient found right inguinal hernia omentum bowel within hernia easily reduced patient also found phimosis easily removedprocedure informed consent risks benefits procedure explained patient patient brought operating suite general endotracheal intubation prepped draped normal sterile fashion infraumbilical incision made bardparker scalpel umbilical skin elevated towel clip veress needle inserted without difficulty saline drop test proved entrance abdominal cavity abdomen insufflated sufficient pressure mmhg next veress removed bladed trocar inserted without difficulty degree camera laparoscope inserted abdomen explored evidence large right inguinal hernia omentum well bowel within easily reducible attention next made placing port right upper quadrant four fingerbreadths umbilicus skin made blade scalpel port inserted direct visualization port inserted left upper quadrant similar fashion without difficulty direct visualization next grasper blunt dissector used reduce hernia withdraw sac using endoshears peritoneum scored towards midline towards medial umbilical ligament lateral peritoneum spread using blunt dissector opening identifying iliopubic tract identified without difficulty dissection carried freeing hernia sac peritoneum done without difficulty reducing hernia entirety attention next made placing piece prolene mesh placed port placed desired position stapled place medial aspect via mm staples along iliopubic tract mm staples used staple superior edge mesh peritoneum patient reperitonealized reapproximating edge perineum mm staples done without difficulty three ports removed direct visualization evidence bleeding mm ports closed vicryl ur needle skin closed running subcuticular undyed vicryl steristrips sterile dressings applied attention next made carrying circumcision foreskin retracted back penis head desired amount removing foreskin marked skin marker foreskin put tension using clamp protect penis head blade scalpel used remove foreskin sending specimen done without difficulty next remaining edges retracted hemostasis obtained bovie electrocautery skin edges reapproximated plain gut simple interrupted fashion circumferentially done without difficulty maintaining hemostasisa petroleum jelly applied coban dressing patient tolerated procedure well well transferred recovery extubation stable condition

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Recurrent right inguinal hernia, as well as phimosis.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Recurrent right inguinal hernia, as well as phimosis.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED: , Laparoscopic right inguinal herniorrhaphy with mesh, as well as a circumcision.,ANESTHESIA: , General endotracheal.,COMPLICATIONS: , None.,DISPOSITION: , The patient tolerated the procedure well and was transferred to recovery room in stable condition.,SPECIMEN: , Foreskin.,BRIEF HISTORY: , This patient is a 66-year-old African-American male who presented to Dr. Y's office with recurrent right inguinal hernia for the second time requesting hernia repair. The procedure was discussed with the patient and the patient opted for laparoscopic repair due to multiple attempts at the open inguinal repair on the right. The patient also is requesting circumcision with phimosis at the same operating time setting.,INTRAOPERATIVE FINDINGS: , The patient was found to have a right inguinal hernia with omentum and bowel within the hernia, which was easily reduced. The patient was also found to have a phimosis, which was easily removed.,PROCEDURE:, After informed consent, the risks and benefits of the procedure were explained to the patient. The patient was brought to operating suite, after general endotracheal intubation, prepped and draped in the normal sterile fashion. An infraumbilical incision was made with a #15 Bard-Parker scalpel. The umbilical skin was elevated with a towel clip and the Veress needle was inserted without difficulty. Saline drop test proved entrance into the abdominal cavity and then the abdomen was insufflated to sufficient pressure of 15 mmHg. Next, the Veress was removed and #10 bladed trocar was inserted without difficulty. The 30-degree camera laparoscope was then inserted and the abdomen was explored. There was evidence of a large right inguinal hernia, which had omentum as well as bowel within it, easily reducible. Attention was next made to placing a #12 port in the right upper quadrant, four fingerbreadths from the umbilicus. Again, a skin was made with a #15 blade scalpel and the #12 port was inserted under direct visualization. A #5 port was inserted in the left upper quadrant in similar fashion without difficulty under direct visualization. Next, a grasper with blunt dissector was used to reduce the hernia and withdraw the sac and using an Endoshears, the peritoneum was scored towards the midline and towards the medial umbilical ligament and lateral. The peritoneum was then spread using the blunt dissector, opening up and identifying the iliopubic tract, which was identified without difficulty. Dissection was carried out, freeing up the hernia sac from the peritoneum. This was done without difficulty reducing the hernia in its entirety. Attention was next made to placing a piece of Prolene mesh, it was placed through the #12 port and placed into the desired position, stapled into place in its medial aspect via the 4 mm staples along the iliopubic tract. The 4.8 mm staples were then used to staple the superior edge of the mesh just below the peritoneum and then the patient was re-peritonealized, re-approximating edge of the perineum with the 4.8 mm staples. This was done without difficulty. All three ports were removed under direct visualization. No evidence of bleeding and the #10 and #12 mm ports were closed with #0-Vicryl and UR6 needle. Skin was closed with running subcuticular #4-0 undyed Vicryl. Steri-Strips and sterile dressings were applied. Attention was next made to carrying out the circumcision. The foreskin was retracted back over the penis head. The desired amount of removing foreskin was marked out with a skin marker. The foreskin was then put on tension using a clamp to protect the penis head. A #15 blade scalpel was used to remove the foreskin and sending off as specimen. This was done without difficulty. Next, the remaining edges were retracted, hemostasis was obtained with Bovie electrocautery and the skin edges were re-approximated with #2-0 plain gut in simple interrupted fashion and circumferentially. This was done without difficulty maintaining hemostasis.,A petroleum jelly was applied with a Coban dressing. The patient tolerated this procedure well and was well and was transferred to recovery after extubation in stable condition. ### Response: Surgery, Urology

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Recurrent severe right auricular hematoma.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Recurrent severe right auricular hematoma.,TITLE OF PROCEDURE:, Incision and drainage with bolster dressing placement of right ear recurrent auricular hematoma.,ANESTHESIA: , Xylocaine 1% with 1:100,000 dilution of epinephrine totaling 2 mL.,COMPLICATIONS:, None.,FINDINGS: , Approximately 5 mL of serosanguineous drainage.,PROCEDURE: , The patient underwent an incision and drainage procedure with stay suture placement on 05/28/2008 by me and also by Dr. X on 05/23/2008 for a large near 100% auricular hematoma. She presents for suture removal; however, there is still fluid noted now at the antihelix fold above the concha bullosa below previous sutures placed by Dr. X. It was recommended that this area be drained through the previous incision and drainage incision which has healed and wound care by the patient appears to be very poor if any at all being performed which may be complicating matters. Consent was obtained. The patient is aware that the complications with this ear area severe and auricular deformity is inevitable; however, quick prompt aggressive drainage addressing fluid collections offers a best chance for improvement from an already very difficult situation.,The area was prepped in the usual manner, localized and the previous incision was reopened with a curved hemostat and about 5 mL of serosanguineous drainage was noted. A through-and-through Keith needle bolster dressing was applied with cottonoid pledget on both sides of the ear to help compression. She tolerated this procedure very well.

preoperative diagnosis recurrent severe right auricular hematomapostoperative diagnosis recurrent severe right auricular hematomatitle procedure incision drainage bolster dressing placement right ear recurrent auricular hematomaanesthesia xylocaine dilution epinephrine totaling mlcomplications nonefindings approximately ml serosanguineous drainageprocedure patient underwent incision drainage procedure stay suture placement also dr x large near auricular hematoma presents suture removal however still fluid noted antihelix fold concha bullosa previous sutures placed dr x recommended area drained previous incision drainage incision healed wound care patient appears poor performed may complicating matters consent obtained patient aware complications ear area severe auricular deformity inevitable however quick prompt aggressive drainage addressing fluid collections offers best chance improvement already difficult situationthe area prepped usual manner localized previous incision reopened curved hemostat ml serosanguineous drainage noted throughandthrough keith needle bolster dressing applied cottonoid pledget sides ear help compression tolerated procedure well

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Recurrent severe right auricular hematoma.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Recurrent severe right auricular hematoma.,TITLE OF PROCEDURE:, Incision and drainage with bolster dressing placement of right ear recurrent auricular hematoma.,ANESTHESIA: , Xylocaine 1% with 1:100,000 dilution of epinephrine totaling 2 mL.,COMPLICATIONS:, None.,FINDINGS: , Approximately 5 mL of serosanguineous drainage.,PROCEDURE: , The patient underwent an incision and drainage procedure with stay suture placement on 05/28/2008 by me and also by Dr. X on 05/23/2008 for a large near 100% auricular hematoma. She presents for suture removal; however, there is still fluid noted now at the antihelix fold above the concha bullosa below previous sutures placed by Dr. X. It was recommended that this area be drained through the previous incision and drainage incision which has healed and wound care by the patient appears to be very poor if any at all being performed which may be complicating matters. Consent was obtained. The patient is aware that the complications with this ear area severe and auricular deformity is inevitable; however, quick prompt aggressive drainage addressing fluid collections offers a best chance for improvement from an already very difficult situation.,The area was prepped in the usual manner, localized and the previous incision was reopened with a curved hemostat and about 5 mL of serosanguineous drainage was noted. A through-and-through Keith needle bolster dressing was applied with cottonoid pledget on both sides of the ear to help compression. She tolerated this procedure very well. ### Response: ENT - Otolaryngology, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Recurrent tonsillitis.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Recurrent tonsillitis.,PROCEDURE: ,Adenotonsillectomy.,COMPLICATIONS:, None.,PROCEDURE DETAILS:, The patient was brought to the operating room and, under general endotracheal anesthesia in supine position, the table turned and a McIvor mouthgag placed. The adenoid bed was examined and was moderately hypertrophied. Adenoid curettes were used to remove this tissue and packs placed. Next, the right tonsil was grasped with a curved Allis and, using the gold laser, the anterior tonsillar pillar incised and, with this laser, dissection carried from the superior pole to the inferior pole and removed off the tonsillar muscular bed. A similar procedure was performed on the contralateral tonsil. Following meticulous hemostasis, saline was used to irrigate and no further bleeding noted. The patient was then allowed to awaken and was brought to the recovery room in stable condition.

preoperative diagnosis recurrent tonsillitispostoperative diagnosis recurrent tonsillitisprocedure adenotonsillectomycomplications noneprocedure details patient brought operating room general endotracheal anesthesia supine position table turned mcivor mouthgag placed adenoid bed examined moderately hypertrophied adenoid curettes used remove tissue packs placed next right tonsil grasped curved allis using gold laser anterior tonsillar pillar incised laser dissection carried superior pole inferior pole removed tonsillar muscular bed similar procedure performed contralateral tonsil following meticulous hemostasis saline used irrigate bleeding noted patient allowed awaken brought recovery room stable condition

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Recurrent tonsillitis.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Recurrent tonsillitis.,PROCEDURE: ,Adenotonsillectomy.,COMPLICATIONS:, None.,PROCEDURE DETAILS:, The patient was brought to the operating room and, under general endotracheal anesthesia in supine position, the table turned and a McIvor mouthgag placed. The adenoid bed was examined and was moderately hypertrophied. Adenoid curettes were used to remove this tissue and packs placed. Next, the right tonsil was grasped with a curved Allis and, using the gold laser, the anterior tonsillar pillar incised and, with this laser, dissection carried from the superior pole to the inferior pole and removed off the tonsillar muscular bed. A similar procedure was performed on the contralateral tonsil. Following meticulous hemostasis, saline was used to irrigate and no further bleeding noted. The patient was then allowed to awaken and was brought to the recovery room in stable condition. ### Response: ENT - Otolaryngology, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Recurrent vulvar melanoma.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Recurrent vulvar melanoma.,OPERATION PERFORMED: , Radical anterior hemivulvectomy. Posterior skinning vulvectomy.,SPECIMENS: , Radical anterior hemivulvectomy, posterior skinning vulvectomy.,INDICATIONS FOR PROCEDURE: , The patient has a history of vulvar melanoma first diagnosed in November of 1995. She had a surgical resection at that time and recently noted recurrence of an irritated nodule around the clitoris. Biopsy obtained by The patient confirmed recurrence. In addition, biopsies on the posterior labia (left side) demonstrated melanoma in situ.,FINDINGS: , During the examination under anesthesia, the biopsy sites were visible and a slightly pigmented irregular area of epithelium was seen near the clitoris. No other obvious lesions were seen. The room was darkened and a Woods lamp was used to inspect the epithelium. A marking pen was used to outline all pigmented areas, which included several patches on both the right and left labia.,PROCEDURE: , The patient was prepped and draped and a scalpel was used to incise the skin on the anterior portion of the specimen. The radical anterior hemivulvectomy was designed so that a 1.5-2.0 cm margin would be obtained and the depth was carried to the fascia of the urogenital diaphragm. Subcutaneous adipose was divided with electrocautery and the specimen was mobilized from the periosteum. After removal of the radical anterior portion, the skin on the posterior labia and perineal body was mobilized. Skin was incised with a scalpel and electrocautery was used to undermine. After removal of the specimen, the wounds were closed primarily with subcutaneous interrupted stitches of 3-0 Vicryl suture. The final sponge, needle, and instrument counts were correct at the completion of the procedure. The patient was then taken to the Post Anesthesia Care Unit in stable condition.

preoperative diagnosis recurrent vulvar melanomapostoperative diagnosis recurrent vulvar melanomaoperation performed radical anterior hemivulvectomy posterior skinning vulvectomyspecimens radical anterior hemivulvectomy posterior skinning vulvectomyindications procedure patient history vulvar melanoma first diagnosed november surgical resection time recently noted recurrence irritated nodule around clitoris biopsy obtained patient confirmed recurrence addition biopsies posterior labia left side demonstrated melanoma situfindings examination anesthesia biopsy sites visible slightly pigmented irregular area epithelium seen near clitoris obvious lesions seen room darkened woods lamp used inspect epithelium marking pen used outline pigmented areas included several patches right left labiaprocedure patient prepped draped scalpel used incise skin anterior portion specimen radical anterior hemivulvectomy designed cm margin would obtained depth carried fascia urogenital diaphragm subcutaneous adipose divided electrocautery specimen mobilized periosteum removal radical anterior portion skin posterior labia perineal body mobilized skin incised scalpel electrocautery used undermine removal specimen wounds closed primarily subcutaneous interrupted stitches vicryl suture final sponge needle instrument counts correct completion procedure patient taken post anesthesia care unit stable condition

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Recurrent vulvar melanoma.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Recurrent vulvar melanoma.,OPERATION PERFORMED: , Radical anterior hemivulvectomy. Posterior skinning vulvectomy.,SPECIMENS: , Radical anterior hemivulvectomy, posterior skinning vulvectomy.,INDICATIONS FOR PROCEDURE: , The patient has a history of vulvar melanoma first diagnosed in November of 1995. She had a surgical resection at that time and recently noted recurrence of an irritated nodule around the clitoris. Biopsy obtained by The patient confirmed recurrence. In addition, biopsies on the posterior labia (left side) demonstrated melanoma in situ.,FINDINGS: , During the examination under anesthesia, the biopsy sites were visible and a slightly pigmented irregular area of epithelium was seen near the clitoris. No other obvious lesions were seen. The room was darkened and a Woods lamp was used to inspect the epithelium. A marking pen was used to outline all pigmented areas, which included several patches on both the right and left labia.,PROCEDURE: , The patient was prepped and draped and a scalpel was used to incise the skin on the anterior portion of the specimen. The radical anterior hemivulvectomy was designed so that a 1.5-2.0 cm margin would be obtained and the depth was carried to the fascia of the urogenital diaphragm. Subcutaneous adipose was divided with electrocautery and the specimen was mobilized from the periosteum. After removal of the radical anterior portion, the skin on the posterior labia and perineal body was mobilized. Skin was incised with a scalpel and electrocautery was used to undermine. After removal of the specimen, the wounds were closed primarily with subcutaneous interrupted stitches of 3-0 Vicryl suture. The final sponge, needle, and instrument counts were correct at the completion of the procedure. The patient was then taken to the Post Anesthesia Care Unit in stable condition. ### Response: Obstetrics / Gynecology, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Refractory dyspepsia.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:,1. Hiatal hernia.,2. Reflux esophagitis.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED:, Esophagogastroduodenoscopy with pseudo and esophageal biopsy.,ANESTHESIA:, Conscious sedation with Demerol and Versed.,SPECIMEN: , Esophageal biopsy.,COMPLICATIONS: , None.,HISTORY:, The patient is a 52-year-old female morbidly obese black female who has a long history of reflux and GERD type symptoms including complications such as hoarseness and chronic cough. She has been on multiple medical regimens and continues with dyspeptic symptoms.,PROCEDURE: , After proper informed consent was obtained, the patient was brought to the endoscopy suite. She was placed in the left lateral position and was given IV Demerol and Versed for sedation. When adequate level of sedation achieved, the gastroscope was inserted into the hypopharynx and the esophagus was easily intubated. At the GE junction, a hiatal hernia was present. There were mild inflammatory changes consistent with reflux esophagitis. The scope was then passed into the stomach. It was insufflated and the scope was coursed along the greater curvature to the antrum. The pylorus was patent. There was evidence of bile reflux in the antrum. The duodenal bulb and sweep were examined and were without evidence of mass, ulceration, or inflammation. The scope was then brought back into the antrum.,A retroflexion was attempted multiple times, however, the patient was having difficulty holding the air and adequate retroflexion view was not visualized. The gastroscope was then slowly withdrawn. There were no other abnormalities noted in the fundus or body. Once again at the GE junction, esophageal biopsy was taken. The scope was then completely withdrawn. The patient tolerated the procedure and was transferred to the recovery room in stable condition. She will return to the General Medical Floor. We will continue b.i.d proton-pump inhibitor therapy as well as dietary restrictions. She should also attempt significant weight loss.

preoperative diagnosis refractory dyspepsiapostoperative diagnosis hiatal hernia reflux esophagitisprocedure performed esophagogastroduodenoscopy pseudo esophageal biopsyanesthesia conscious sedation demerol versedspecimen esophageal biopsycomplications nonehistory patient yearold female morbidly obese black female long history reflux gerd type symptoms including complications hoarseness chronic cough multiple medical regimens continues dyspeptic symptomsprocedure proper informed consent obtained patient brought endoscopy suite placed left lateral position given iv demerol versed sedation adequate level sedation achieved gastroscope inserted hypopharynx esophagus easily intubated ge junction hiatal hernia present mild inflammatory changes consistent reflux esophagitis scope passed stomach insufflated scope coursed along greater curvature antrum pylorus patent evidence bile reflux antrum duodenal bulb sweep examined without evidence mass ulceration inflammation scope brought back antruma retroflexion attempted multiple times however patient difficulty holding air adequate retroflexion view visualized gastroscope slowly withdrawn abnormalities noted fundus body ge junction esophageal biopsy taken scope completely withdrawn patient tolerated procedure transferred recovery room stable condition return general medical floor continue bid protonpump inhibitor therapy well dietary restrictions also attempt significant weight loss

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Refractory dyspepsia.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:,1. Hiatal hernia.,2. Reflux esophagitis.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED:, Esophagogastroduodenoscopy with pseudo and esophageal biopsy.,ANESTHESIA:, Conscious sedation with Demerol and Versed.,SPECIMEN: , Esophageal biopsy.,COMPLICATIONS: , None.,HISTORY:, The patient is a 52-year-old female morbidly obese black female who has a long history of reflux and GERD type symptoms including complications such as hoarseness and chronic cough. She has been on multiple medical regimens and continues with dyspeptic symptoms.,PROCEDURE: , After proper informed consent was obtained, the patient was brought to the endoscopy suite. She was placed in the left lateral position and was given IV Demerol and Versed for sedation. When adequate level of sedation achieved, the gastroscope was inserted into the hypopharynx and the esophagus was easily intubated. At the GE junction, a hiatal hernia was present. There were mild inflammatory changes consistent with reflux esophagitis. The scope was then passed into the stomach. It was insufflated and the scope was coursed along the greater curvature to the antrum. The pylorus was patent. There was evidence of bile reflux in the antrum. The duodenal bulb and sweep were examined and were without evidence of mass, ulceration, or inflammation. The scope was then brought back into the antrum.,A retroflexion was attempted multiple times, however, the patient was having difficulty holding the air and adequate retroflexion view was not visualized. The gastroscope was then slowly withdrawn. There were no other abnormalities noted in the fundus or body. Once again at the GE junction, esophageal biopsy was taken. The scope was then completely withdrawn. The patient tolerated the procedure and was transferred to the recovery room in stable condition. She will return to the General Medical Floor. We will continue b.i.d proton-pump inhibitor therapy as well as dietary restrictions. She should also attempt significant weight loss. ### Response: Gastroenterology, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Rejection of renal transplant.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Rejection of renal transplant.,OPERATIVE PROCEDURE: , Transplant nephrectomy.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: , The patient has had rapid deterioration of her kidney function since her transplant at ABCD one year ago. The patient was recently thought to have obstruction to the transplant and a stent was placed in to the transplant percutaneously, but the ureter was wide open and there was no evidence of obstruction. Because the kidney was felt to be irretrievably lost and immunosuppression had been withdrawn, it was elected to go ahead and remove the kidney and hopes that her fever and toxic course could be arrested.,With the patient in the supine position, the previously placed nephrostomy tube was removed. The patient then after adequate prepping and draping, and placing of a small roll under the right hip, underwent an incision in the direction of the transplant incision down through and through all muscle layers and into the preperitoneal space. The kidney was encountered and kidney was dissected free of its attachments through the retroperitoneal space. During the course of dissection, the iliac artery and vein were identified as was the native ureter and the patient's ilioinguinal nerve; all these were preserved. The individual vessels in the kidney were identified, ligated, and incised, and the kidney was removed. The ureter was encountered during the course of resection, but was not ligated. The patient's retroperitoneal space was irrigated with antibiotic solution and #19 Blake drain was placed into the retroperitoneal space, and the patient returned to the recovery room in good condition.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS: 900 mL.

preoperative diagnosis rejection renal transplantpostoperative diagnosis rejection renal transplantoperative procedure transplant nephrectomydescription procedure patient rapid deterioration kidney function since transplant abcd one year ago patient recently thought obstruction transplant stent placed transplant percutaneously ureter wide open evidence obstruction kidney felt irretrievably lost immunosuppression withdrawn elected go ahead remove kidney hopes fever toxic course could arrestedwith patient supine position previously placed nephrostomy tube removed patient adequate prepping draping placing small roll right hip underwent incision direction transplant incision muscle layers preperitoneal space kidney encountered kidney dissected free attachments retroperitoneal space course dissection iliac artery vein identified native ureter patients ilioinguinal nerve preserved individual vessels kidney identified ligated incised kidney removed ureter encountered course resection ligated patients retroperitoneal space irrigated antibiotic solution blake drain placed retroperitoneal space patient returned recovery room good conditionestimated blood loss ml

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Rejection of renal transplant.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Rejection of renal transplant.,OPERATIVE PROCEDURE: , Transplant nephrectomy.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: , The patient has had rapid deterioration of her kidney function since her transplant at ABCD one year ago. The patient was recently thought to have obstruction to the transplant and a stent was placed in to the transplant percutaneously, but the ureter was wide open and there was no evidence of obstruction. Because the kidney was felt to be irretrievably lost and immunosuppression had been withdrawn, it was elected to go ahead and remove the kidney and hopes that her fever and toxic course could be arrested.,With the patient in the supine position, the previously placed nephrostomy tube was removed. The patient then after adequate prepping and draping, and placing of a small roll under the right hip, underwent an incision in the direction of the transplant incision down through and through all muscle layers and into the preperitoneal space. The kidney was encountered and kidney was dissected free of its attachments through the retroperitoneal space. During the course of dissection, the iliac artery and vein were identified as was the native ureter and the patient's ilioinguinal nerve; all these were preserved. The individual vessels in the kidney were identified, ligated, and incised, and the kidney was removed. The ureter was encountered during the course of resection, but was not ligated. The patient's retroperitoneal space was irrigated with antibiotic solution and #19 Blake drain was placed into the retroperitoneal space, and the patient returned to the recovery room in good condition.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS: 900 mL. ### Response: Nephrology, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Renal failure.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Renal failure.,OPERATION PERFORMED: , Insertion of peritoneal dialysis catheter.,ANESTHESIA: , General.,INDICATIONS: ,This 14-year-old young lady is in the renal failure and in need of dialysis. She had had a previous PD catheter placed, but it became infected and had to be removed. She, therefore, comes back to the operating room for a new PD catheter.,OPERATIVE PROCEDURE: ,After the induction of general anesthetic, the abdomen was prepped and draped in the usual manner. A small transverse right upper quadrant incision was made and carried down through the skin and subcutaneous tissue with sharp dissection. The fascia was divided and the posterior fascia and peritoneum were identified. A hole was made in the posterior fascia through the peritoneum and into the peritoneal cavity. The omentum came up through the hole and so therefore the omentum was actually brought up and a small portion of it removed, which could easily be brought up through the incision. A PD catheter was then placed into the pelvis over a guidewire. At this point, the peritoneum and posterior fascia was closed around the catheter. The anterior fascia was then closed over the top of the cuff leaving the cuff buried in the fascia. The second incision was then made lateral and the catheter brought out through a second incision and the subcutaneous cuff then positioned at that site. The catheter was then connected and two runs of a 150 mL of fluid were made with a good inflow and a good clear return. The skin was closed with 5-0 subcuticular Monocryl. Sterile dressings were applied and the young lady awakened and taken to the recovery room in satisfactory condition.

preoperative diagnosis renal failurepostoperative diagnosis renal failureoperation performed insertion peritoneal dialysis catheteranesthesia generalindications yearold young lady renal failure need dialysis previous pd catheter placed became infected removed therefore comes back operating room new pd catheteroperative procedure induction general anesthetic abdomen prepped draped usual manner small transverse right upper quadrant incision made carried skin subcutaneous tissue sharp dissection fascia divided posterior fascia peritoneum identified hole made posterior fascia peritoneum peritoneal cavity omentum came hole therefore omentum actually brought small portion removed could easily brought incision pd catheter placed pelvis guidewire point peritoneum posterior fascia closed around catheter anterior fascia closed top cuff leaving cuff buried fascia second incision made lateral catheter brought second incision subcutaneous cuff positioned site catheter connected two runs ml fluid made good inflow good clear return skin closed subcuticular monocryl sterile dressings applied young lady awakened taken recovery room satisfactory condition

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Renal failure.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Renal failure.,OPERATION PERFORMED: , Insertion of peritoneal dialysis catheter.,ANESTHESIA: , General.,INDICATIONS: ,This 14-year-old young lady is in the renal failure and in need of dialysis. She had had a previous PD catheter placed, but it became infected and had to be removed. She, therefore, comes back to the operating room for a new PD catheter.,OPERATIVE PROCEDURE: ,After the induction of general anesthetic, the abdomen was prepped and draped in the usual manner. A small transverse right upper quadrant incision was made and carried down through the skin and subcutaneous tissue with sharp dissection. The fascia was divided and the posterior fascia and peritoneum were identified. A hole was made in the posterior fascia through the peritoneum and into the peritoneal cavity. The omentum came up through the hole and so therefore the omentum was actually brought up and a small portion of it removed, which could easily be brought up through the incision. A PD catheter was then placed into the pelvis over a guidewire. At this point, the peritoneum and posterior fascia was closed around the catheter. The anterior fascia was then closed over the top of the cuff leaving the cuff buried in the fascia. The second incision was then made lateral and the catheter brought out through a second incision and the subcutaneous cuff then positioned at that site. The catheter was then connected and two runs of a 150 mL of fluid were made with a good inflow and a good clear return. The skin was closed with 5-0 subcuticular Monocryl. Sterile dressings were applied and the young lady awakened and taken to the recovery room in satisfactory condition. ### Response: Nephrology, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Respiratory failure.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: ,Respiratory failure.,OPERATIVE PROCEDURE: , Tracheotomy.,ANESTHESIA: ,General inhalational.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: , The patient was taken to the operating room, placed supine on the operating table. General inhalational anesthesia was administered through the patient's existing 4.0 endotracheal tube. The neck was extended and secured with tape and incision in the midline of the neck approximately 2 fingerbreadths above the sternal notch was outlined. The incision measured approximately 1 cm and was just below the palpable cricoid cartilage and first tracheal ring. The incision area was infiltrated with 1% Xylocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000. A #67 blade was used to perform the incision. Electrocautery was used to remove excess fat tissue to expose the strap muscles. The strap muscles were grasped and divided in the midline with a cutting electrocautery. Sharp dissection was used to expose the anterior trachea and cricoid cartilage. The thyroid isthmus was identified crossing just below the cricoid cartilage. This was divided in the midline with electrocautery. Blunt dissection was used to expose adequate cartilaginous rings. A 4.0 silk was used for stay sutures to the midline of the cricoid. Additional stay sutures were placed on each side of the third tracheal ring. Thin DuoDerm was placed around the stoma. The tracheal incision was performed with a #11 blade through the second, third, and fourth tracheal rings. The cartilaginous edges were secured to the skin edges with interrupted #4-0 Monocryl. A 4.5 PED tight-to-shaft cuffed Bivona tube was placed and secured with Velcro ties. A flexible scope was passed through the tracheotomy tube. The carina was visualized approximately 1.5 cm distal to the distal end of the tracheotomy tube. Ventilation was confirmed. There was good chest rise and no appreciable leak. The procedure was terminated. The patient was in stable condition. Bleeding was negligible and she was transferred back to the Pediatric intensive care unit in stable condition.

preoperative diagnosis respiratory failurepostoperative diagnosis respiratory failureoperative procedure tracheotomyanesthesia general inhalationaldescription procedure patient taken operating room placed supine operating table general inhalational anesthesia administered patients existing endotracheal tube neck extended secured tape incision midline neck approximately fingerbreadths sternal notch outlined incision measured approximately cm palpable cricoid cartilage first tracheal ring incision area infiltrated xylocaine epinephrine blade used perform incision electrocautery used remove excess fat tissue expose strap muscles strap muscles grasped divided midline cutting electrocautery sharp dissection used expose anterior trachea cricoid cartilage thyroid isthmus identified crossing cricoid cartilage divided midline electrocautery blunt dissection used expose adequate cartilaginous rings silk used stay sutures midline cricoid additional stay sutures placed side third tracheal ring thin duoderm placed around stoma tracheal incision performed blade second third fourth tracheal rings cartilaginous edges secured skin edges interrupted monocryl ped tighttoshaft cuffed bivona tube placed secured velcro ties flexible scope passed tracheotomy tube carina visualized approximately cm distal distal end tracheotomy tube ventilation confirmed good chest rise appreciable leak procedure terminated patient stable condition bleeding negligible transferred back pediatric intensive care unit stable condition

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Respiratory failure.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: ,Respiratory failure.,OPERATIVE PROCEDURE: , Tracheotomy.,ANESTHESIA: ,General inhalational.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: , The patient was taken to the operating room, placed supine on the operating table. General inhalational anesthesia was administered through the patient's existing 4.0 endotracheal tube. The neck was extended and secured with tape and incision in the midline of the neck approximately 2 fingerbreadths above the sternal notch was outlined. The incision measured approximately 1 cm and was just below the palpable cricoid cartilage and first tracheal ring. The incision area was infiltrated with 1% Xylocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000. A #67 blade was used to perform the incision. Electrocautery was used to remove excess fat tissue to expose the strap muscles. The strap muscles were grasped and divided in the midline with a cutting electrocautery. Sharp dissection was used to expose the anterior trachea and cricoid cartilage. The thyroid isthmus was identified crossing just below the cricoid cartilage. This was divided in the midline with electrocautery. Blunt dissection was used to expose adequate cartilaginous rings. A 4.0 silk was used for stay sutures to the midline of the cricoid. Additional stay sutures were placed on each side of the third tracheal ring. Thin DuoDerm was placed around the stoma. The tracheal incision was performed with a #11 blade through the second, third, and fourth tracheal rings. The cartilaginous edges were secured to the skin edges with interrupted #4-0 Monocryl. A 4.5 PED tight-to-shaft cuffed Bivona tube was placed and secured with Velcro ties. A flexible scope was passed through the tracheotomy tube. The carina was visualized approximately 1.5 cm distal to the distal end of the tracheotomy tube. Ventilation was confirmed. There was good chest rise and no appreciable leak. The procedure was terminated. The patient was in stable condition. Bleeding was negligible and she was transferred back to the Pediatric intensive care unit in stable condition. ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Retained hardware in left elbow.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Retained hardware in left elbow.,PROCEDURE: , Hardware removal in the left elbow.,ANESTHESIA: , Procedure done under general anesthesia. The patient also received 4 mL of 0.25% Marcaine of local anesthetic.,TOURNIQUET: ,There is no tourniquet time.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS: ,Minimal.,COMPLICATIONS: ,No intraoperative complications.,HISTORY AND PHYSICAL: ,The patient is a 5-year, 8-month-old male who presented to me direct from ED with distracted left lateral condyle fracture. He underwent screw compression for the fracture in October 2007. The fracture has subsequently healed and the patient presents for hardware removal. The risks and benefits of surgery were discussed. The risks of surgery include the risk of anesthesia, infection, bleeding, changes in sensation and motion of extremity, failure of removal of hardware, failure to relieve pain or improved range of motion. All questions were answered and the family agreed to the above plan.,PROCEDURE: , The patient was taken to the operating room, placed supine on the operating table. General anesthesia was then administered. The patient's left upper extremity was then prepped and draped in standard surgical fashion. Using his previous incision, dissection was carried down through the screw. A guide wire was placed inside the screw and the screw was removed without incident. The patient had an extension lag of about 15 to 20 degrees. Elbow is manipulated and his arm was able to be extended to zero degrees dorsiflex. The washer was also removed without incident. Wound was then irrigated and closed using #2-0 Vicryl and #4-0 Monocryl. Wound was injected with 0.25% Marcaine. The wound was then dressed with Steri-Strips, Xeroform, 4 x4 and bias. The patient tolerated the procedure well and subsequently taken to the recovery in stable condition.,DISCHARGE NOTE: , The patient will be discharged on date of surgery. He is to follow up in one week's time for a wound check. This can be done at his primary care physician's office. The patient should keep his postop dressing for about 4 to 5 days. He may then wet the wound, but not scrub it. The patient may resume regular activities in about 2 weeks. The patient was given Tylenol with Codeine 10 mL p.o. every 3 to 4 hours p.r.n.

preoperative diagnosis retained hardware left elbowpostoperative diagnosis retained hardware left elbowprocedure hardware removal left elbowanesthesia procedure done general anesthesia patient also received ml marcaine local anesthetictourniquet tourniquet timeestimated blood loss minimalcomplications intraoperative complicationshistory physical patient year monthold male presented direct ed distracted left lateral condyle fracture underwent screw compression fracture october fracture subsequently healed patient presents hardware removal risks benefits surgery discussed risks surgery include risk anesthesia infection bleeding changes sensation motion extremity failure removal hardware failure relieve pain improved range motion questions answered family agreed planprocedure patient taken operating room placed supine operating table general anesthesia administered patients left upper extremity prepped draped standard surgical fashion using previous incision dissection carried screw guide wire placed inside screw screw removed without incident patient extension lag degrees elbow manipulated arm able extended zero degrees dorsiflex washer also removed without incident wound irrigated closed using vicryl monocryl wound injected marcaine wound dressed steristrips xeroform x bias patient tolerated procedure well subsequently taken recovery stable conditiondischarge note patient discharged date surgery follow one weeks time wound check done primary care physicians office patient keep postop dressing days may wet wound scrub patient may resume regular activities weeks patient given tylenol codeine ml po every hours prn

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Retained hardware in left elbow.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Retained hardware in left elbow.,PROCEDURE: , Hardware removal in the left elbow.,ANESTHESIA: , Procedure done under general anesthesia. The patient also received 4 mL of 0.25% Marcaine of local anesthetic.,TOURNIQUET: ,There is no tourniquet time.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS: ,Minimal.,COMPLICATIONS: ,No intraoperative complications.,HISTORY AND PHYSICAL: ,The patient is a 5-year, 8-month-old male who presented to me direct from ED with distracted left lateral condyle fracture. He underwent screw compression for the fracture in October 2007. The fracture has subsequently healed and the patient presents for hardware removal. The risks and benefits of surgery were discussed. The risks of surgery include the risk of anesthesia, infection, bleeding, changes in sensation and motion of extremity, failure of removal of hardware, failure to relieve pain or improved range of motion. All questions were answered and the family agreed to the above plan.,PROCEDURE: , The patient was taken to the operating room, placed supine on the operating table. General anesthesia was then administered. The patient's left upper extremity was then prepped and draped in standard surgical fashion. Using his previous incision, dissection was carried down through the screw. A guide wire was placed inside the screw and the screw was removed without incident. The patient had an extension lag of about 15 to 20 degrees. Elbow is manipulated and his arm was able to be extended to zero degrees dorsiflex. The washer was also removed without incident. Wound was then irrigated and closed using #2-0 Vicryl and #4-0 Monocryl. Wound was injected with 0.25% Marcaine. The wound was then dressed with Steri-Strips, Xeroform, 4 x4 and bias. The patient tolerated the procedure well and subsequently taken to the recovery in stable condition.,DISCHARGE NOTE: , The patient will be discharged on date of surgery. He is to follow up in one week's time for a wound check. This can be done at his primary care physician's office. The patient should keep his postop dressing for about 4 to 5 days. He may then wet the wound, but not scrub it. The patient may resume regular activities in about 2 weeks. The patient was given Tylenol with Codeine 10 mL p.o. every 3 to 4 hours p.r.n. ### Response: Orthopedic, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Retained hardware, right ulnar.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Retained hardware, right ulnar,PROCEDURE: , Hardware removal, right ulnar.,ANESTHESIA:, The patient received 2.5 mL of 0.25% Marcaine and local anesthetic.,COMPLICATIONS: , No intraoperative complications.,DRAINS: , None.,SPECIMENS: , None.,HISTORY AND PHYSICAL: ,The patient is a 5-year, 5-month-old male who sustained a both-bone forearm fracture in September 2007. The fracture healed uneventfully, but then the patient subsequently suffered a refracture one month ago. The patient had shortening in arms, noted in both bones. The parents opted for surgical stabilization with nailing. This was performed one month ago on return visit. His ulnar nail was quite prominent underneath the skin. It was decided to remove the ulnar nail early and place the patient in another cast for 3 weeks.,Risks and benefits of the surgery were discussed with the mother. Risk of surgery incudes risks of anesthesia, infection, bleeding, changes in sensation in most of the extremity, need for longer casting. All questions were answered and mother agreed to above plan.,PROCEDURE IN DETAIL: ,The patient was seen in the operative room, placed supine on operating room table. General anesthesia was then administered. The patient was given Ancef preoperatively. The left elbow was prepped and draped in a standard surgical fashion. A small incision was made over the palm with K-wire. This was removed without incident. The wound was irrigated. The bursitis was curetted. Wounds closed using #4-0 Monocryl. The wound was clean and dry, dressed with Xeroform 4 x 4s and Webril. Please note the area infiltrated with 0.25% Marcaine. The patient was then placed in a long-arm cast. The patient tolerated the procedure well and was subsequently taken to the recovery room in stable condition.,POSTOPERATIVE PLAN: ,The patient will maintain the cast for 3 more weeks. Intraoperative nail was given to the mother. The patient to take Tylenol with Codeine as needed. All questions were answered.,

preoperative diagnosis retained hardware right ulnarpostoperative diagnosis retained hardware right ulnarprocedure hardware removal right ulnaranesthesia patient received ml marcaine local anestheticcomplications intraoperative complicationsdrains nonespecimens nonehistory physical patient year monthold male sustained bothbone forearm fracture september fracture healed uneventfully patient subsequently suffered refracture one month ago patient shortening arms noted bones parents opted surgical stabilization nailing performed one month ago return visit ulnar nail quite prominent underneath skin decided remove ulnar nail early place patient another cast weeksrisks benefits surgery discussed mother risk surgery incudes risks anesthesia infection bleeding changes sensation extremity need longer casting questions answered mother agreed planprocedure detail patient seen operative room placed supine operating room table general anesthesia administered patient given ancef preoperatively left elbow prepped draped standard surgical fashion small incision made palm kwire removed without incident wound irrigated bursitis curetted wounds closed using monocryl wound clean dry dressed xeroform x webril please note area infiltrated marcaine patient placed longarm cast patient tolerated procedure well subsequently taken recovery room stable conditionpostoperative plan patient maintain cast weeks intraoperative nail given mother patient take tylenol codeine needed questions answered

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Retained hardware, right ulnar.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Retained hardware, right ulnar,PROCEDURE: , Hardware removal, right ulnar.,ANESTHESIA:, The patient received 2.5 mL of 0.25% Marcaine and local anesthetic.,COMPLICATIONS: , No intraoperative complications.,DRAINS: , None.,SPECIMENS: , None.,HISTORY AND PHYSICAL: ,The patient is a 5-year, 5-month-old male who sustained a both-bone forearm fracture in September 2007. The fracture healed uneventfully, but then the patient subsequently suffered a refracture one month ago. The patient had shortening in arms, noted in both bones. The parents opted for surgical stabilization with nailing. This was performed one month ago on return visit. His ulnar nail was quite prominent underneath the skin. It was decided to remove the ulnar nail early and place the patient in another cast for 3 weeks.,Risks and benefits of the surgery were discussed with the mother. Risk of surgery incudes risks of anesthesia, infection, bleeding, changes in sensation in most of the extremity, need for longer casting. All questions were answered and mother agreed to above plan.,PROCEDURE IN DETAIL: ,The patient was seen in the operative room, placed supine on operating room table. General anesthesia was then administered. The patient was given Ancef preoperatively. The left elbow was prepped and draped in a standard surgical fashion. A small incision was made over the palm with K-wire. This was removed without incident. The wound was irrigated. The bursitis was curetted. Wounds closed using #4-0 Monocryl. The wound was clean and dry, dressed with Xeroform 4 x 4s and Webril. Please note the area infiltrated with 0.25% Marcaine. The patient was then placed in a long-arm cast. The patient tolerated the procedure well and was subsequently taken to the recovery room in stable condition.,POSTOPERATIVE PLAN: ,The patient will maintain the cast for 3 more weeks. Intraoperative nail was given to the mother. The patient to take Tylenol with Codeine as needed. All questions were answered., ### Response: Orthopedic, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right acute on chronic slipped capital femoral epiphysis.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right acute on chronic slipped capital femoral epiphysis.,PROCEDURE: , Revision and in situ pinning of the right hip.,ANESTHESIA: , Surgery performed under general anesthesia.,COMPLICATIONS: ,There were no intraoperative complications.,DRAINS: , None.,SPECIMENS: , None.,LOCAL: ,10 mL of 0.50% Marcaine local anesthetic.,HISTORY AND PHYSICAL: , The patient is a 13-year-old girl who presented in November with an acute on chronic right slipped capital femoral epiphysis. She underwent in situ pinning. The patient on followup; however, noted to have intraarticular protrusion of her screw. This was not noted intraoperatively on previous fluoroscopic views. Given this finding, I explained to the father and especially the mother that this can cause further joint damage and that the screw would need to be exchanged for a shorter one. Risks and benefits of surgery were discussed. Risks of surgery include risk of anesthesia, infection, bleeding, changes in sensation and motion of the extremity, failure to remove the screw, possible continued joint stiffness or damage. All questions were answered and parents agreed to above plan.,PROCEDURE IN DETAIL: , The patient was taken to the operating room and placed supine on the operating table. General anesthesia was then administered. The patient received Ancef preoperatively. A small bump was placed underneath her right buttock. The right upper thigh was then prepped and draped in standard surgical fashion. The upper aspect of the incision was reincised. The dissection was carried down to the crew, which was easily found. A guidewire was placed inside the screw with subsequent removal of the previous screw. The previous screw measured 65 mm. A 60 mm screw was then placed under direct visualization with fluoroscopy. The hip was taken through full range of motion to check on the length of the screw, which demonstrated no intraarticular protrusion. The guidewire was removed. The wound was then irrigated and closed using 2-0 Vicryl in the fascial layer as well as the subcutaneous fat. The skin was closed with 4-0 Monocryl. The wound was cleaned and dried, dressed with Steri-Strips, Xeroform, 4 x 4s, and tape. The area was infiltrated with total 10 mL of 0.5% Marcaine local anesthetic.,POSTOPERATIVE PLAN: , The patient will be discharged on the day of surgery. She should continue toe touch weightbearing on her leg. The wound may be wet in approximately 5 days. The patient should follow up in clinic in about 10 days. The patient is given Vicodin for pain. Intraoperative findings were relayed to the mother.

preoperative diagnosis right acute chronic slipped capital femoral epiphysispostoperative diagnosis right acute chronic slipped capital femoral epiphysisprocedure revision situ pinning right hipanesthesia surgery performed general anesthesiacomplications intraoperative complicationsdrains nonespecimens nonelocal ml marcaine local anesthetichistory physical patient yearold girl presented november acute chronic right slipped capital femoral epiphysis underwent situ pinning patient followup however noted intraarticular protrusion screw noted intraoperatively previous fluoroscopic views given finding explained father especially mother cause joint damage screw would need exchanged shorter one risks benefits surgery discussed risks surgery include risk anesthesia infection bleeding changes sensation motion extremity failure remove screw possible continued joint stiffness damage questions answered parents agreed planprocedure detail patient taken operating room placed supine operating table general anesthesia administered patient received ancef preoperatively small bump placed underneath right buttock right upper thigh prepped draped standard surgical fashion upper aspect incision reincised dissection carried crew easily found guidewire placed inside screw subsequent removal previous screw previous screw measured mm mm screw placed direct visualization fluoroscopy hip taken full range motion check length screw demonstrated intraarticular protrusion guidewire removed wound irrigated closed using vicryl fascial layer well subcutaneous fat skin closed monocryl wound cleaned dried dressed steristrips xeroform x tape area infiltrated total ml marcaine local anestheticpostoperative plan patient discharged day surgery continue toe touch weightbearing leg wound may wet approximately days patient follow clinic days patient given vicodin pain intraoperative findings relayed mother

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right acute on chronic slipped capital femoral epiphysis.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right acute on chronic slipped capital femoral epiphysis.,PROCEDURE: , Revision and in situ pinning of the right hip.,ANESTHESIA: , Surgery performed under general anesthesia.,COMPLICATIONS: ,There were no intraoperative complications.,DRAINS: , None.,SPECIMENS: , None.,LOCAL: ,10 mL of 0.50% Marcaine local anesthetic.,HISTORY AND PHYSICAL: , The patient is a 13-year-old girl who presented in November with an acute on chronic right slipped capital femoral epiphysis. She underwent in situ pinning. The patient on followup; however, noted to have intraarticular protrusion of her screw. This was not noted intraoperatively on previous fluoroscopic views. Given this finding, I explained to the father and especially the mother that this can cause further joint damage and that the screw would need to be exchanged for a shorter one. Risks and benefits of surgery were discussed. Risks of surgery include risk of anesthesia, infection, bleeding, changes in sensation and motion of the extremity, failure to remove the screw, possible continued joint stiffness or damage. All questions were answered and parents agreed to above plan.,PROCEDURE IN DETAIL: , The patient was taken to the operating room and placed supine on the operating table. General anesthesia was then administered. The patient received Ancef preoperatively. A small bump was placed underneath her right buttock. The right upper thigh was then prepped and draped in standard surgical fashion. The upper aspect of the incision was reincised. The dissection was carried down to the crew, which was easily found. A guidewire was placed inside the screw with subsequent removal of the previous screw. The previous screw measured 65 mm. A 60 mm screw was then placed under direct visualization with fluoroscopy. The hip was taken through full range of motion to check on the length of the screw, which demonstrated no intraarticular protrusion. The guidewire was removed. The wound was then irrigated and closed using 2-0 Vicryl in the fascial layer as well as the subcutaneous fat. The skin was closed with 4-0 Monocryl. The wound was cleaned and dried, dressed with Steri-Strips, Xeroform, 4 x 4s, and tape. The area was infiltrated with total 10 mL of 0.5% Marcaine local anesthetic.,POSTOPERATIVE PLAN: , The patient will be discharged on the day of surgery. She should continue toe touch weightbearing on her leg. The wound may be wet in approximately 5 days. The patient should follow up in clinic in about 10 days. The patient is given Vicodin for pain. Intraoperative findings were relayed to the mother. ### Response: Orthopedic, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right breast mass with atypical proliferative cells on fine-needle aspiration.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Benign breast mass.,ANESTHESIA: , General,NAME OF OPERATION:, Excision of right breast mass.,PROCEDURE:, With the patient in the supine position, the right breast was prepped and draped in a sterile fashion. A curvilinear incision was made directly over the mass in the upper-outer quadrant of the right breast. Dissection was carried out around a firm mass, which was dissected with surrounding margins of breast tissue. Hemostasis was obtained using electrocautery. Frozen section exam showed a fibroadenoma with some proliferative hyperplasia within the fibroadenoma, but appeared benign. The breast tissues were approximated using 4-0 Vicryl. The skin was closed using 5-0 Vicryl running subcuticular stitches. A sterile bandage was applied. The patient tolerated the procedure well.,

preoperative diagnosis right breast mass atypical proliferative cells fineneedle aspirationpostoperative diagnosis benign breast massanesthesia generalname operation excision right breast massprocedure patient supine position right breast prepped draped sterile fashion curvilinear incision made directly mass upperouter quadrant right breast dissection carried around firm mass dissected surrounding margins breast tissue hemostasis obtained using electrocautery frozen section exam showed fibroadenoma proliferative hyperplasia within fibroadenoma appeared benign breast tissues approximated using vicryl skin closed using vicryl running subcuticular stitches sterile bandage applied patient tolerated procedure well

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right breast mass with atypical proliferative cells on fine-needle aspiration.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Benign breast mass.,ANESTHESIA: , General,NAME OF OPERATION:, Excision of right breast mass.,PROCEDURE:, With the patient in the supine position, the right breast was prepped and draped in a sterile fashion. A curvilinear incision was made directly over the mass in the upper-outer quadrant of the right breast. Dissection was carried out around a firm mass, which was dissected with surrounding margins of breast tissue. Hemostasis was obtained using electrocautery. Frozen section exam showed a fibroadenoma with some proliferative hyperplasia within the fibroadenoma, but appeared benign. The breast tissues were approximated using 4-0 Vicryl. The skin was closed using 5-0 Vicryl running subcuticular stitches. A sterile bandage was applied. The patient tolerated the procedure well., ### Response: Hematology - Oncology, Obstetrics / Gynecology, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right carpal tunnel syndrome.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right carpal tunnel syndrome.,TITLE OF THE PROCEDURE: , Right carpal tunnel release.,COMPLICATIONS:, There were no complications during the procedure.,SPECIMEN: ,The specimen was sent to pathology.,INSTRUMENTS: , All counts were correct at the end of the case and no complications were encountered.,INDICATIONS: ,This is a 69-year-old female who have been complaining of right hand pain, which was steadily getting worse over a prolonged period of time. The patient had tried nonoperative therapy, which did not assist the patient. The patient had previous diagnosis of carpal tunnel and EMG showed compression of the right median nerve. As a result of these findings, the patient was sent to my office presenting with this history and was carefully evaluated. On initial evaluation, the patient had the symptomology of carpal tunnel syndrome. The patient at the time had the risks, benefits, and alternatives thoroughly explained to her. All questions were answered. No guarantees were given. The patient had agreed to the surgical procedure and the postoperative rehabilitation as needed.,DETAILS OF THE PROCEDURE: ,The patient was brought to the operating room, placed supine on the operating room table, prepped and draped in the sterile fashion and was given sedation. The patient was then given sedation. Once this was complete, the area overlying the carpal ligament was carefully injected with 1% lidocaine with epinephrine. The patient had this area carefully and thoroughly injected with approximately 10 mL of lidocaine with epinephrine and once this was complete, a 15-blade knife was then used to incise the skin opposite the radial aspect of the fourth ray. Careful dissection under direct visualization was performed through the subcutaneous fat as well as through the palmar fascia. A Weitlaner retractor was then used to retract the skin and careful dissection through the palmar fascia would then revealed the transverse carpal ligament. This was then carefully incised using a 15-blade knife and once entry was again into the carpal canal, a Freer elevator was then inserted and under direct visualization, the carpal ligament was then released. The transverse carpal ligament was carefully released first in the distal direction until palmar fat could be visualized and by palpation no further ligament could be felt. The area was well hemostased with the 1% lidocaine with epinephrine and both proximal and distal dissection along the nerve was performed. Visualization of the transverse carpal ligament was maintained with Weitlaner retractor as well as centric. Both the centric and the Ragnell were used to retract both proximal and distal corners of the incision and the entirety of the area was under direct visualization at all times. Palmar fascia was released both proximally and distally as well as the transverse carpal ligament. Direct palpation of the carpal canal demonstrated a full and complete release. Observation of the median nerve revealed an area of hyperemia in the distal two-thirds of the nerve, which demonstrated the likely area of compression. Once this was complete, hemostasis was established using bipolar cautery and some small surface bleeders and irrigation of the area was performed and then the closure was achieved with 4-0 chromic suture in a horizontal mattress and interrupted stitch. Xeroform was then applied to the incision. A bulky dressing was then applied consisting of Kerlix and Ace wrap, and the patient was taken to the recovery room in stable condition without any complications.

preoperative diagnosis right carpal tunnel syndromepostoperative diagnosis right carpal tunnel syndrometitle procedure right carpal tunnel releasecomplications complications procedurespecimen specimen sent pathologyinstruments counts correct end case complications encounteredindications yearold female complaining right hand pain steadily getting worse prolonged period time patient tried nonoperative therapy assist patient patient previous diagnosis carpal tunnel emg showed compression right median nerve result findings patient sent office presenting history carefully evaluated initial evaluation patient symptomology carpal tunnel syndrome patient time risks benefits alternatives thoroughly explained questions answered guarantees given patient agreed surgical procedure postoperative rehabilitation neededdetails procedure patient brought operating room placed supine operating room table prepped draped sterile fashion given sedation patient given sedation complete area overlying carpal ligament carefully injected lidocaine epinephrine patient area carefully thoroughly injected approximately ml lidocaine epinephrine complete blade knife used incise skin opposite radial aspect fourth ray careful dissection direct visualization performed subcutaneous fat well palmar fascia weitlaner retractor used retract skin careful dissection palmar fascia would revealed transverse carpal ligament carefully incised using blade knife entry carpal canal freer elevator inserted direct visualization carpal ligament released transverse carpal ligament carefully released first distal direction palmar fat could visualized palpation ligament could felt area well hemostased lidocaine epinephrine proximal distal dissection along nerve performed visualization transverse carpal ligament maintained weitlaner retractor well centric centric ragnell used retract proximal distal corners incision entirety area direct visualization times palmar fascia released proximally distally well transverse carpal ligament direct palpation carpal canal demonstrated full complete release observation median nerve revealed area hyperemia distal twothirds nerve demonstrated likely area compression complete hemostasis established using bipolar cautery small surface bleeders irrigation area performed closure achieved chromic suture horizontal mattress interrupted stitch xeroform applied incision bulky dressing applied consisting kerlix ace wrap patient taken recovery room stable condition without complications

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right carpal tunnel syndrome.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right carpal tunnel syndrome.,TITLE OF THE PROCEDURE: , Right carpal tunnel release.,COMPLICATIONS:, There were no complications during the procedure.,SPECIMEN: ,The specimen was sent to pathology.,INSTRUMENTS: , All counts were correct at the end of the case and no complications were encountered.,INDICATIONS: ,This is a 69-year-old female who have been complaining of right hand pain, which was steadily getting worse over a prolonged period of time. The patient had tried nonoperative therapy, which did not assist the patient. The patient had previous diagnosis of carpal tunnel and EMG showed compression of the right median nerve. As a result of these findings, the patient was sent to my office presenting with this history and was carefully evaluated. On initial evaluation, the patient had the symptomology of carpal tunnel syndrome. The patient at the time had the risks, benefits, and alternatives thoroughly explained to her. All questions were answered. No guarantees were given. The patient had agreed to the surgical procedure and the postoperative rehabilitation as needed.,DETAILS OF THE PROCEDURE: ,The patient was brought to the operating room, placed supine on the operating room table, prepped and draped in the sterile fashion and was given sedation. The patient was then given sedation. Once this was complete, the area overlying the carpal ligament was carefully injected with 1% lidocaine with epinephrine. The patient had this area carefully and thoroughly injected with approximately 10 mL of lidocaine with epinephrine and once this was complete, a 15-blade knife was then used to incise the skin opposite the radial aspect of the fourth ray. Careful dissection under direct visualization was performed through the subcutaneous fat as well as through the palmar fascia. A Weitlaner retractor was then used to retract the skin and careful dissection through the palmar fascia would then revealed the transverse carpal ligament. This was then carefully incised using a 15-blade knife and once entry was again into the carpal canal, a Freer elevator was then inserted and under direct visualization, the carpal ligament was then released. The transverse carpal ligament was carefully released first in the distal direction until palmar fat could be visualized and by palpation no further ligament could be felt. The area was well hemostased with the 1% lidocaine with epinephrine and both proximal and distal dissection along the nerve was performed. Visualization of the transverse carpal ligament was maintained with Weitlaner retractor as well as centric. Both the centric and the Ragnell were used to retract both proximal and distal corners of the incision and the entirety of the area was under direct visualization at all times. Palmar fascia was released both proximally and distally as well as the transverse carpal ligament. Direct palpation of the carpal canal demonstrated a full and complete release. Observation of the median nerve revealed an area of hyperemia in the distal two-thirds of the nerve, which demonstrated the likely area of compression. Once this was complete, hemostasis was established using bipolar cautery and some small surface bleeders and irrigation of the area was performed and then the closure was achieved with 4-0 chromic suture in a horizontal mattress and interrupted stitch. Xeroform was then applied to the incision. A bulky dressing was then applied consisting of Kerlix and Ace wrap, and the patient was taken to the recovery room in stable condition without any complications. ### Response: Orthopedic, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right carpal tunnel syndrome.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Right carpal tunnel syndrome.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED: , Right carpal tunnel release.,PROCEDURE NOTE: ,The right upper extremity was prepped and draped in the usual fashion. IV sedation was supplied by the anesthesiologist. A local block using 6 cc of 0.5% Marcaine was used at the transverse wrist crease using a 25 gauge needle, superficial to the transverse carpal ligament.,The upper extremity was exsanguinated with a 6 inch ace wrap.,Tourniquet time was less than 10 minutes at 250 mmHg.,An incision was used in line with the third web space just to the ulnar side of the thenar crease. It was carried sharply down to the transverse wrist crease. The transverse carpal ligament was identified and released under direct vision. Proximal to the transverse wrist crease it was released subcutaneously. During the entire procedure care was taken to avoid injury to the median nerve proper, the recurrent median, the palmar cutaneous branch, the ulnar neurovascular bundle and the superficial palmar arch. The nerve appeared to be mildly constricted. Closure was routine with running 5-0 nylon. A bulky hand dressing as well as a volar splint was applied and the patient was sent to the outpatient surgery area in good condition.

preoperative diagnosis right carpal tunnel syndromepostoperative diagnosis right carpal tunnel syndromeprocedure performed right carpal tunnel releaseprocedure note right upper extremity prepped draped usual fashion iv sedation supplied anesthesiologist local block using cc marcaine used transverse wrist crease using gauge needle superficial transverse carpal ligamentthe upper extremity exsanguinated inch ace wraptourniquet time less minutes mmhgan incision used line third web space ulnar side thenar crease carried sharply transverse wrist crease transverse carpal ligament identified released direct vision proximal transverse wrist crease released subcutaneously entire procedure care taken avoid injury median nerve proper recurrent median palmar cutaneous branch ulnar neurovascular bundle superficial palmar arch nerve appeared mildly constricted closure routine running nylon bulky hand dressing well volar splint applied patient sent outpatient surgery area good condition

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right carpal tunnel syndrome.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Right carpal tunnel syndrome.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED: , Right carpal tunnel release.,PROCEDURE NOTE: ,The right upper extremity was prepped and draped in the usual fashion. IV sedation was supplied by the anesthesiologist. A local block using 6 cc of 0.5% Marcaine was used at the transverse wrist crease using a 25 gauge needle, superficial to the transverse carpal ligament.,The upper extremity was exsanguinated with a 6 inch ace wrap.,Tourniquet time was less than 10 minutes at 250 mmHg.,An incision was used in line with the third web space just to the ulnar side of the thenar crease. It was carried sharply down to the transverse wrist crease. The transverse carpal ligament was identified and released under direct vision. Proximal to the transverse wrist crease it was released subcutaneously. During the entire procedure care was taken to avoid injury to the median nerve proper, the recurrent median, the palmar cutaneous branch, the ulnar neurovascular bundle and the superficial palmar arch. The nerve appeared to be mildly constricted. Closure was routine with running 5-0 nylon. A bulky hand dressing as well as a volar splint was applied and the patient was sent to the outpatient surgery area in good condition. ### Response: Orthopedic, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right chronic subdural hematoma.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: ,Right chronic subdural hematoma.,TYPE OF OPERATION: , Right burr hole craniotomy for evacuation of subdural hematoma and placement of subdural drain.,ANESTHESIA: , General endotracheal anesthesia.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS: , 100 cc.,OPERATIVE PROCEDURE:, In preoperative identification, the patient was taken to the operating room and placed in supine position. Following induction of satisfactory general endotracheal anesthesia, the patient was prepared for surgery. Table was turned. The right shoulder roll was placed. The head was turned to the left and rested on a doughnut. The scalp was shaved, and then prepped and draped in usual sterile fashion. Incisions were marked along a putative right frontotemporal craniotomy frontally and over the parietal boss. The parietal boss incision was opened. It was about an inch and a half in length. It was carried down to the skull. Self-retaining retractor was placed. A bur hole was now fashioned with the perforator. This was widened with a 2-mm Kerrison punch. The dura was now coagulated with bipolar electrocautery. It was opened in a cruciate-type fashion. The dural edges were coagulated back to the bony edges. There was egress of a large amount of liquid. Under pressure, we irrigated for quite sometime until irrigation was returning mostly clear. A subdural drain was now inserted under direct vision into the subdural space and brought out through a separate stab incision. It was secured with a 3-0 nylon suture. The area was closed with interrupted inverted 2-0 Vicryl sutures. The skin was closed with staples. Sterile dressing was applied. The patient was subsequently returned back to anesthesia. He was extubated in the operating room, and transported to PACU in satisfactory condition.

preoperative diagnosis right chronic subdural hematomapostoperative diagnosis right chronic subdural hematomatype operation right burr hole craniotomy evacuation subdural hematoma placement subdural drainanesthesia general endotracheal anesthesiaestimated blood loss ccoperative procedure preoperative identification patient taken operating room placed supine position following induction satisfactory general endotracheal anesthesia patient prepared surgery table turned right shoulder roll placed head turned left rested doughnut scalp shaved prepped draped usual sterile fashion incisions marked along putative right frontotemporal craniotomy frontally parietal boss parietal boss incision opened inch half length carried skull selfretaining retractor placed bur hole fashioned perforator widened mm kerrison punch dura coagulated bipolar electrocautery opened cruciatetype fashion dural edges coagulated back bony edges egress large amount liquid pressure irrigated quite sometime irrigation returning mostly clear subdural drain inserted direct vision subdural space brought separate stab incision secured nylon suture area closed interrupted inverted vicryl sutures skin closed staples sterile dressing applied patient subsequently returned back anesthesia extubated operating room transported pacu satisfactory condition

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right chronic subdural hematoma.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: ,Right chronic subdural hematoma.,TYPE OF OPERATION: , Right burr hole craniotomy for evacuation of subdural hematoma and placement of subdural drain.,ANESTHESIA: , General endotracheal anesthesia.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS: , 100 cc.,OPERATIVE PROCEDURE:, In preoperative identification, the patient was taken to the operating room and placed in supine position. Following induction of satisfactory general endotracheal anesthesia, the patient was prepared for surgery. Table was turned. The right shoulder roll was placed. The head was turned to the left and rested on a doughnut. The scalp was shaved, and then prepped and draped in usual sterile fashion. Incisions were marked along a putative right frontotemporal craniotomy frontally and over the parietal boss. The parietal boss incision was opened. It was about an inch and a half in length. It was carried down to the skull. Self-retaining retractor was placed. A bur hole was now fashioned with the perforator. This was widened with a 2-mm Kerrison punch. The dura was now coagulated with bipolar electrocautery. It was opened in a cruciate-type fashion. The dural edges were coagulated back to the bony edges. There was egress of a large amount of liquid. Under pressure, we irrigated for quite sometime until irrigation was returning mostly clear. A subdural drain was now inserted under direct vision into the subdural space and brought out through a separate stab incision. It was secured with a 3-0 nylon suture. The area was closed with interrupted inverted 2-0 Vicryl sutures. The skin was closed with staples. Sterile dressing was applied. The patient was subsequently returned back to anesthesia. He was extubated in the operating room, and transported to PACU in satisfactory condition. ### Response: Neurology, Neurosurgery, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right colon tumor.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSES:,1. Right colon cancer.,2. Ascites.,3. Adhesions.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED:,1. Exploratory laparotomy.,2. Lysis of adhesions.,3. Right hemicolectomy.,ANESTHESIA: , General.,COMPLICATIONS: , None.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS: , Less than 200 cc.,URINE OUTPUT: , 200 cc.,CRYSTALLOIDS GIVEN: , 2700 cc.,INDICATIONS FOR THIS PROCEDURE: ,The patient is a 53-year-old African-American female who presented with near obstructing lesion at the hepatic flexure. The patient underwent a colonoscopy which found this lesion and biopsies were taken proving invasive adenocarcinoma. The patient was NG decompressed preoperatively and was prepared for surgery. The need for removal of the colon cancer was explained at length. The patient was agreeable to proceed with the surgery and signed preoperatively informed consent.,PROCEDURE: , The patient was taken to the Operative Suite and placed in the supine position under general anesthesia per Anesthesia Department and NG and Foley catheters were placed preoperatively. She was given triple antibiotics IV. Due to her near obstructive symptoms, a formal ________ was not performed.,The abdomen was prepped and draped in the usual sterile fashion. A midline laparotomy incision was made with a #10 blade scalpel and subcutaneous tissues were separated with electrocautery down to the anterior abdominal fascia. Once divided, the intraabdominal cavity was accessed and bowel was protected as the rest of the abdominal wall was opened in the midline. Extensive fluid was seen upon entering the abdomen, ascites fluid, which was clear straw-colored and this was sampled for cytology. Next, the small bowel was retracted with digital exploration and there was a evidence of hepatic flexure, colonic mass, which was adherent to the surrounding tissues. With mobilization of the colon along the line of Toldt down to the right gutter, the entire ileocecal region up to the transverse colon was mobilized into the field. Next, a window was made 5 inches from the ileocecal valve and a GIA-75 was fired across the ileum. Next, a second GIA device was fired across the proximal transverse colon, just sparring the middle colic artery. The dissection was then carried down along the mesentry, down to the root of the mesentry. Several lymph nodes were sampled carefully, and small radiopaque clips were applied along the base of the mesentry. The mesentry vessels are hemostated and tied with #0-Vicryl suture sequentially, ligated in between. Once this specimen was submitted to pathology, the wound was inspected. There was no evidence of bleeding from any of the suture sites. Next, a side-by-side anastomosis was performed between the transverse colon and the terminal ileum. A third GIA-75 was fired side-by-side and GIA-55 was used to close the anastomosis. A patent anastomosis was palpated. The anastomosis was then protected with a #2-0 Vicryl #0-muscular suture. Next, the mesenteric root was closed with a running #0-Vicryl suture to prevent any chance of internal hernia. The suture sites were inspected and there was no evidence of leakage. Next, the intraabdominal cavity was thoroughly irrigated with sterile saline and the anastomosis was carried into the right lower gutter. Omentum was used to cover the intestines which appeared dilated and indurated from the near obstruction. Next, the abdominal wall was reapproximated and the fascial layer using a two running loop PDS sutures meeting in the middle with good approximation of both the abdominal fascia. Additional sterile saline was used to irrigate the subcutaneous fat and then the skin was closed with sequential sterile staples.,Sterile dressing was applied and the skin was cleansed and the patient was awakened from anesthesia without difficulty and extubated in the Operating Room and she was transferred to Recovery Room in stable condition and will be continued to be monitored on the Telemetry Floor with triple antibiotics and NG decompression.,

preoperative diagnosis right colon tumorpostoperative diagnoses right colon cancer ascites adhesionsprocedure performed exploratory laparotomy lysis adhesions right hemicolectomyanesthesia generalcomplications noneestimated blood loss less ccurine output cccrystalloids given ccindications procedure patient yearold africanamerican female presented near obstructing lesion hepatic flexure patient underwent colonoscopy found lesion biopsies taken proving invasive adenocarcinoma patient ng decompressed preoperatively prepared surgery need removal colon cancer explained length patient agreeable proceed surgery signed preoperatively informed consentprocedure patient taken operative suite placed supine position general anesthesia per anesthesia department ng foley catheters placed preoperatively given triple antibiotics iv due near obstructive symptoms formal ________ performedthe abdomen prepped draped usual sterile fashion midline laparotomy incision made blade scalpel subcutaneous tissues separated electrocautery anterior abdominal fascia divided intraabdominal cavity accessed bowel protected rest abdominal wall opened midline extensive fluid seen upon entering abdomen ascites fluid clear strawcolored sampled cytology next small bowel retracted digital exploration evidence hepatic flexure colonic mass adherent surrounding tissues mobilization colon along line toldt right gutter entire ileocecal region transverse colon mobilized field next window made inches ileocecal valve gia fired across ileum next second gia device fired across proximal transverse colon sparring middle colic artery dissection carried along mesentry root mesentry several lymph nodes sampled carefully small radiopaque clips applied along base mesentry mesentry vessels hemostated tied vicryl suture sequentially ligated specimen submitted pathology wound inspected evidence bleeding suture sites next sidebyside anastomosis performed transverse colon terminal ileum third gia fired sidebyside gia used close anastomosis patent anastomosis palpated anastomosis protected vicryl muscular suture next mesenteric root closed running vicryl suture prevent chance internal hernia suture sites inspected evidence leakage next intraabdominal cavity thoroughly irrigated sterile saline anastomosis carried right lower gutter omentum used cover intestines appeared dilated indurated near obstruction next abdominal wall reapproximated fascial layer using two running loop pds sutures meeting middle good approximation abdominal fascia additional sterile saline used irrigate subcutaneous fat skin closed sequential sterile staplessterile dressing applied skin cleansed patient awakened anesthesia without difficulty extubated operating room transferred recovery room stable condition continued monitored telemetry floor triple antibiotics ng decompression

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right colon tumor.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSES:,1. Right colon cancer.,2. Ascites.,3. Adhesions.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED:,1. Exploratory laparotomy.,2. Lysis of adhesions.,3. Right hemicolectomy.,ANESTHESIA: , General.,COMPLICATIONS: , None.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS: , Less than 200 cc.,URINE OUTPUT: , 200 cc.,CRYSTALLOIDS GIVEN: , 2700 cc.,INDICATIONS FOR THIS PROCEDURE: ,The patient is a 53-year-old African-American female who presented with near obstructing lesion at the hepatic flexure. The patient underwent a colonoscopy which found this lesion and biopsies were taken proving invasive adenocarcinoma. The patient was NG decompressed preoperatively and was prepared for surgery. The need for removal of the colon cancer was explained at length. The patient was agreeable to proceed with the surgery and signed preoperatively informed consent.,PROCEDURE: , The patient was taken to the Operative Suite and placed in the supine position under general anesthesia per Anesthesia Department and NG and Foley catheters were placed preoperatively. She was given triple antibiotics IV. Due to her near obstructive symptoms, a formal ________ was not performed.,The abdomen was prepped and draped in the usual sterile fashion. A midline laparotomy incision was made with a #10 blade scalpel and subcutaneous tissues were separated with electrocautery down to the anterior abdominal fascia. Once divided, the intraabdominal cavity was accessed and bowel was protected as the rest of the abdominal wall was opened in the midline. Extensive fluid was seen upon entering the abdomen, ascites fluid, which was clear straw-colored and this was sampled for cytology. Next, the small bowel was retracted with digital exploration and there was a evidence of hepatic flexure, colonic mass, which was adherent to the surrounding tissues. With mobilization of the colon along the line of Toldt down to the right gutter, the entire ileocecal region up to the transverse colon was mobilized into the field. Next, a window was made 5 inches from the ileocecal valve and a GIA-75 was fired across the ileum. Next, a second GIA device was fired across the proximal transverse colon, just sparring the middle colic artery. The dissection was then carried down along the mesentry, down to the root of the mesentry. Several lymph nodes were sampled carefully, and small radiopaque clips were applied along the base of the mesentry. The mesentry vessels are hemostated and tied with #0-Vicryl suture sequentially, ligated in between. Once this specimen was submitted to pathology, the wound was inspected. There was no evidence of bleeding from any of the suture sites. Next, a side-by-side anastomosis was performed between the transverse colon and the terminal ileum. A third GIA-75 was fired side-by-side and GIA-55 was used to close the anastomosis. A patent anastomosis was palpated. The anastomosis was then protected with a #2-0 Vicryl #0-muscular suture. Next, the mesenteric root was closed with a running #0-Vicryl suture to prevent any chance of internal hernia. The suture sites were inspected and there was no evidence of leakage. Next, the intraabdominal cavity was thoroughly irrigated with sterile saline and the anastomosis was carried into the right lower gutter. Omentum was used to cover the intestines which appeared dilated and indurated from the near obstruction. Next, the abdominal wall was reapproximated and the fascial layer using a two running loop PDS sutures meeting in the middle with good approximation of both the abdominal fascia. Additional sterile saline was used to irrigate the subcutaneous fat and then the skin was closed with sequential sterile staples.,Sterile dressing was applied and the skin was cleansed and the patient was awakened from anesthesia without difficulty and extubated in the Operating Room and she was transferred to Recovery Room in stable condition and will be continued to be monitored on the Telemetry Floor with triple antibiotics and NG decompression., ### Response: Gastroenterology, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right distal both-bone forearm fracture.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right distal both-bone forearm fracture.,INDICATIONS:, Mr. ABC is a 10-year-old boy who suffered a fall resulting in a right distal both-bone forearm fracture. Upon evaluation by Orthopedic Surgery team in the emergency department, it was determined that a closed reduction under conscious sedation and application of a splint was warranted. This was discussed with the parents who expressed verbal and written consent.,PROCEDURE:, Conscious sedation was achieved via propofol via the emergency department staff. Afterwards, traction with re-creation of the injury pattern was utilized to achieve reduction of the patient's fracture. This was confirmed with image intensifier. Subsequently, the patient was placed into a splint. The patient was aroused from conscious sedation and at this time it was noted that he had full sensation throughout radial, median, and ulnar nerve distributions and positive extensor pollicis longus, flexor pollicis longus, dorsal and palmar interossei.,DISPOSITION: ,Post-reduction x-rays revealed good alignment in the AP x-rays. The lateral x-rays also revealed adequate reduction. At this time, we will allow the patient to be discharged home and have him follow up with Dr. XYZ in one week.

preoperative diagnosis right distal bothbone forearm fracturepostoperative diagnosis right distal bothbone forearm fractureindications mr abc yearold boy suffered fall resulting right distal bothbone forearm fracture upon evaluation orthopedic surgery team emergency department determined closed reduction conscious sedation application splint warranted discussed parents expressed verbal written consentprocedure conscious sedation achieved via propofol via emergency department staff afterwards traction recreation injury pattern utilized achieve reduction patients fracture confirmed image intensifier subsequently patient placed splint patient aroused conscious sedation time noted full sensation throughout radial median ulnar nerve distributions positive extensor pollicis longus flexor pollicis longus dorsal palmar interosseidisposition postreduction xrays revealed good alignment ap xrays lateral xrays also revealed adequate reduction time allow patient discharged home follow dr xyz one week

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right distal both-bone forearm fracture.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right distal both-bone forearm fracture.,INDICATIONS:, Mr. ABC is a 10-year-old boy who suffered a fall resulting in a right distal both-bone forearm fracture. Upon evaluation by Orthopedic Surgery team in the emergency department, it was determined that a closed reduction under conscious sedation and application of a splint was warranted. This was discussed with the parents who expressed verbal and written consent.,PROCEDURE:, Conscious sedation was achieved via propofol via the emergency department staff. Afterwards, traction with re-creation of the injury pattern was utilized to achieve reduction of the patient's fracture. This was confirmed with image intensifier. Subsequently, the patient was placed into a splint. The patient was aroused from conscious sedation and at this time it was noted that he had full sensation throughout radial, median, and ulnar nerve distributions and positive extensor pollicis longus, flexor pollicis longus, dorsal and palmar interossei.,DISPOSITION: ,Post-reduction x-rays revealed good alignment in the AP x-rays. The lateral x-rays also revealed adequate reduction. At this time, we will allow the patient to be discharged home and have him follow up with Dr. XYZ in one week. ### Response: Orthopedic, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right distal femoral, subperiosteal abscess.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right distal femoral, subperiosteal abscess.,OPERATION:, Repeat irrigation and debridement of above.,ANESTHESIA: , General.,BLOOD LOSS:, Minimal.,FLUID: , Per anesthesia.,DRAINS: , Hemovac times two.,COMPLICATIONS: , None apparent.,SPECIMENS:, To microbiology.,INDICATIONS: , She is a 10-year-old girl who has history of burns and has developed a subperiosteal abscess at her right distal femur. I am bringing her back to the operating room for another exploration of this area and washout. This will be the third procedure for this. At the last time, there was gross purulence that was encountered. Since that time, the patient has defervesced. Her white count is slowly coming down. Her C-reactive protein is slowly coming down.,PROCEDURE IN DETAIL:, After informed consent was obtained, operative site marked, and after preoperative antibiotics were given, the patient was brought back to the operating room and placed supine on the operating table, where Anesthesia induced general anesthesia. The patient's right lower extremity was prepped and draped in normal sterile fashion. Surgical timeout occurred verifying the patient's identification, surgical site, surgical procedure, and administration of antibiotics. The patient's previous incision sites had the sutures removed. We bluntly dissected down through to the IT band. These deep stitches were then removed. We exposed the area of the subperiosteal abscess. The tissue looked much better than at the last surgery. We irrigated this area with three liters of saline containing bacitracin. Next, we made our small medial window to assist with washout of the joint itself. We put another three liters of saline containing bacitracin through the knee joint. Lastly, we did another three liters into the area of the distal femur with three liters of plain saline. We then placed two Hemovac drains, one in the metaphysis and one superficially. We closed the deep fascia with #1 PDS. Subcutaneous layers with 2-0 Monocryl and closed the skin with 2-0 nylon. We placed a sterile dressing. We then turned the case over to Dr. Petty for dressing change and skin graft.,PLAN: ,Our plan will be to pull the drains in 48 hours. We will then continue to watch the patient's fever curve and follow her white count to see how she is responding to the operative and medical therapies.,

preoperative diagnosis right distal femoral subperiosteal abscesspostoperative diagnosis right distal femoral subperiosteal abscessoperation repeat irrigation debridement aboveanesthesia generalblood loss minimalfluid per anesthesiadrains hemovac times twocomplications none apparentspecimens microbiologyindications yearold girl history burns developed subperiosteal abscess right distal femur bringing back operating room another exploration area washout third procedure last time gross purulence encountered since time patient defervesced white count slowly coming creactive protein slowly coming downprocedure detail informed consent obtained operative site marked preoperative antibiotics given patient brought back operating room placed supine operating table anesthesia induced general anesthesia patients right lower extremity prepped draped normal sterile fashion surgical timeout occurred verifying patients identification surgical site surgical procedure administration antibiotics patients previous incision sites sutures removed bluntly dissected band deep stitches removed exposed area subperiosteal abscess tissue looked much better last surgery irrigated area three liters saline containing bacitracin next made small medial window assist washout joint put another three liters saline containing bacitracin knee joint lastly another three liters area distal femur three liters plain saline placed two hemovac drains one metaphysis one superficially closed deep fascia pds subcutaneous layers monocryl closed skin nylon placed sterile dressing turned case dr petty dressing change skin graftplan plan pull drains hours continue watch patients fever curve follow white count see responding operative medical therapies

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right distal femoral, subperiosteal abscess.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right distal femoral, subperiosteal abscess.,OPERATION:, Repeat irrigation and debridement of above.,ANESTHESIA: , General.,BLOOD LOSS:, Minimal.,FLUID: , Per anesthesia.,DRAINS: , Hemovac times two.,COMPLICATIONS: , None apparent.,SPECIMENS:, To microbiology.,INDICATIONS: , She is a 10-year-old girl who has history of burns and has developed a subperiosteal abscess at her right distal femur. I am bringing her back to the operating room for another exploration of this area and washout. This will be the third procedure for this. At the last time, there was gross purulence that was encountered. Since that time, the patient has defervesced. Her white count is slowly coming down. Her C-reactive protein is slowly coming down.,PROCEDURE IN DETAIL:, After informed consent was obtained, operative site marked, and after preoperative antibiotics were given, the patient was brought back to the operating room and placed supine on the operating table, where Anesthesia induced general anesthesia. The patient's right lower extremity was prepped and draped in normal sterile fashion. Surgical timeout occurred verifying the patient's identification, surgical site, surgical procedure, and administration of antibiotics. The patient's previous incision sites had the sutures removed. We bluntly dissected down through to the IT band. These deep stitches were then removed. We exposed the area of the subperiosteal abscess. The tissue looked much better than at the last surgery. We irrigated this area with three liters of saline containing bacitracin. Next, we made our small medial window to assist with washout of the joint itself. We put another three liters of saline containing bacitracin through the knee joint. Lastly, we did another three liters into the area of the distal femur with three liters of plain saline. We then placed two Hemovac drains, one in the metaphysis and one superficially. We closed the deep fascia with #1 PDS. Subcutaneous layers with 2-0 Monocryl and closed the skin with 2-0 nylon. We placed a sterile dressing. We then turned the case over to Dr. Petty for dressing change and skin graft.,PLAN: ,Our plan will be to pull the drains in 48 hours. We will then continue to watch the patient's fever curve and follow her white count to see how she is responding to the operative and medical therapies., ### Response: Orthopedic, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right failed total knee arthroplasty.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: ,Right failed total knee arthroplasty.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED: , Revision right total knee arthroplasty.,FIRST ANESTHESIA: , Spinal.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS: , Approximately 75 cc.,TOURNIQUET TIME: , 123 minutes. Then it was let down for approximately 15 minutes and then reinflated for another 26 minutes for a total of 149 minutes.,COMPONENTS: , A Zimmer NexGen Legacy knee size D right stemmed femoral component was used. A NexGen femoral component with a distal femoral augmented block, size 5 mm. A NexGen tibial component, size 3 mm was used. A size 14 mm constrained polyethylene surface was used as well. Original patellar component that the patient had was maintained.,COMPLICATIONS: ,None.,BRIEF HISTORY:, The patient is a 68-year-old female with a history of knee pain for 13 years. She had previous total knee arthroplasty and revision at an outside facility. She had continued pain, snapping, malalignment, difficulty with ambulation, and giving away and wished to undergo additional revision surgery.,PROCEDURE:, The patient was taken to the operative suite and placed on the operating table. Department of Anesthesia administered the spinal anesthetic. Once adequately anesthetized, the patient was placed in a supine position. Care was ensured and she was adequately secured and well padded in position. Once this was obtained, the right lower extremity was prepped and draped in the usual sterile fashion. Tourniquet was inflated to approximately 325 mmHg on the right thigh. At this point, an incision was made over her anterior previous knee scar taking this down to the subcutaneous tissue of the overlying retinaculum. A medial parapatellar arthrotomy was then made by using a second knife and this was taken both distally and proximally to allow us to sublux the patella on the lateral aspect to allow exposure to the joint surface. There was noted to be no evidence of purulence or gross clinical appearance of infection, however, intraoperative cultures were taken to asses this as well. At this point, the previous articular surface was then removed using an osteotome until this was left free and then removed. This was done without difficulty. Attention was then directed removing the femoral component. Osteotome was taken around each of the edges until this was gently lifted up and then a femoral extractor was placed around it and this was back flapped until this was easily removed. After this was performed, attention was then directed to the tibial component. An osteotome was again inserted around the surface and this was easily pried loose. There was noted to be minimal difficulty with this and did not appear to have adequate cement fixation. This was evaluated. The bone stalk appeared to be adequate, however, there were noted to be some deficits where we need to trim cement, so we elected to proceed with stemmed component. The attention was first directed to the femur and the femoral canal was opened up and superficially reamed up to a size 18 mm proximal portion for the Zimmer stemmed component. At this point, the distal femoral cut was evaluated with a intramedullary guide and this was noted to be cut in a varus cut leaving us a large deficit of the medial femoral cut. We elected because of this large amount of retic to take off the medial condyle to correct this varus cut to a six degree valgus cut. We elected to augment the medial aspect and take only 5 mm off of the lateral condyle instead of a full 10 to 12. At this point, the distal femoral cutting guide based on the intramedullary head was then placed. Care was ensured that this was aligned in proper rotation with the external epicondylar axis. Once this was pinned in position, approximately a six degree valgus cut was then made. This allowed a portion of the medial condyle to be removed distally. The anterior cut was checked next using the intramedullary guide. The anterior surface cutting block was then placed. This aligned us to anterior cutting block.,We ensured again that rotation was aligned with the epicondylar axis. Once this was adequately aligned with this and gave us some external rotation, this was pinned in position and new anterior cut was made. It was noted that minimal bone was taken off the surface, only a slight portion on the medial anterior surface. _______ was then removed and the chamfer cutting guide was then placed on. This allowed us to make a box cut and recut some of the angled cuts of the distal femur. Once this was placed and pinned in position. Care was then again taken to check that this was in proper rotation and then the chamfer cuts were recut. It was noted that the anterior chamfers did not need to be cut, take off no bone. The posterior chamfers did remove some bony aspects. This was also taken off some of the posterior aspects of the condyles and then the ossicle saw and reciprocal saw were used to take off a notch cut to open up a constrained component. After all these cuts were taken, the guides were then removed and the trial component with a medial 5 mm augment was then placed. This appeared to have an adequate fit and then packed in position. It appeared to be satisfactory. At this point, this was removed and attention was then directed to the tibia. The intramedullary canal was again opened up using a proximal drill and this was reamed to the appropriate size until good _______ was obtained. At this point, the intramedullary guide was used to evaluate a tibial cut. This appeared to be adequate, however, we elected to remove 2 mm of bone to give us a new fresh bony surface. The cutting guide was placed in adequate alignment and checked both the with intramedullary guide and an external alignment rod, which allowed us to ensure that we had proper external rotation of this tibial component. At this point, this was pinned in position and the tibial cut was made to remove an extra 2 mm of bone. This was again removed and a trial tibial stemmed component was then placed as well as the trial augmented stemmed femoral component. This was placed in a proper position. A 10 mm articular surface was placed in the knee and this was taken through range of motion. This was found to have better alignment and satisfactory position. We elected to take an intraoperative x-ray at this point, to evaluate our cut. The intraoperative x-ray demonstrates satisfactory cuts and alignment of the prosthesis. At this point, all trials were removed. The patella was then examined. The rongeur was used to remove the surrounding synovium. The patella was evaluated and found to have mild wear on the lateral aspect of the inferior butt, however, this was very mild and overall had a good position and was well fixed to the bone. It was elected at this time to maintain this anatomic patella that was previously placed. At this point, the joint again was reevaluated and any bone loose fragments removed. There was noted to be some posterior tightness and mild osteophytes. These were removed with a rongeur.,At this time, while preparing the canals, the tourniquet was deflated due to it being 123 minutes. Approximately 10 minutes did get by, as the knee was copiously irrigated and suctioned dried. The tourniquet was then reinflated. The canals were prepped for cementing. They were suction-dried and cleaned. The tibial component was cemented and then impacted into position and ensured it was adequately aligned in proper external rotation and alignment that was previously tried with the trial. Once this was fixed and secured, all extra cement was removed and attention was directed to the femoral component. The stemmed femoral component was then impacted in position and cemented. Again care was ensured that it was in adequate position and proper rotation. A size 14 mm poly was then inserted in between to provide compression. This was then taken through extension and held until cement cured. This was then removed and the components were evaluated. All excess cement was removed and they were well fixed. Size 14 mm trial Poly was then placed and this was taken through range of motion. This was found to have excellent range of motion and good stability. It was elected at this time that we would go with the size 14 mm Poly. This gave us extra Poly for ware and then provide excellent contact throughout the range of motion. The final articular surface was then placed and tightened into position to allow to _______ secured. The knee was then reduced and the knee was taken through range of motion. The patella was tracking with no-touch technique and adequately positioned. At this point, the tourniquet was deflated for second time and then the knee was copiously irrigated and suctioned dry. All bleeding was cauterized using a Bovie cautery. The retinaculum was then repaired using #1 Ethibond in a figure-of-eight fashion. This was reinforced with a running #2-0 Vicryl. The knee was then flexed and noted that the patella was tracking with good alignment. The wound was again copiously irrigated and suctioned dry. A drain was placed prior to retinaculum repair deep to this to provide adequate drainage. At this point, the subcutaneous tissue was closed with #2-0 Vicryl. Skin was approximated with skin clips. Sterile dressing of Adaptic, 4x4, Webril, and ABDs were then placed. A large Dupre dressing was then placed up the entire lower extremity. The patient was then transferred back to recovery in supine position.,DISPOSITION: , The patient tolerated the procedure well with no complications and transferred to PACU in satisfactory condition.

preoperative diagnosis right failed total knee arthroplastypostoperative diagnosis right failed total knee arthroplastyprocedure performed revision right total knee arthroplastyfirst anesthesia spinalestimated blood loss approximately cctourniquet time minutes let approximately minutes reinflated another minutes total minutescomponents zimmer nexgen legacy knee size right stemmed femoral component used nexgen femoral component distal femoral augmented block size mm nexgen tibial component size mm used size mm constrained polyethylene surface used well original patellar component patient maintainedcomplications nonebrief history patient yearold female history knee pain years previous total knee arthroplasty revision outside facility continued pain snapping malalignment difficulty ambulation giving away wished undergo additional revision surgeryprocedure patient taken operative suite placed operating table department anesthesia administered spinal anesthetic adequately anesthetized patient placed supine position care ensured adequately secured well padded position obtained right lower extremity prepped draped usual sterile fashion tourniquet inflated approximately mmhg right thigh point incision made anterior previous knee scar taking subcutaneous tissue overlying retinaculum medial parapatellar arthrotomy made using second knife taken distally proximally allow us sublux patella lateral aspect allow exposure joint surface noted evidence purulence gross clinical appearance infection however intraoperative cultures taken asses well point previous articular surface removed using osteotome left free removed done without difficulty attention directed removing femoral component osteotome taken around edges gently lifted femoral extractor placed around back flapped easily removed performed attention directed tibial component osteotome inserted around surface easily pried loose noted minimal difficulty appear adequate cement fixation evaluated bone stalk appeared adequate however noted deficits need trim cement elected proceed stemmed component attention first directed femur femoral canal opened superficially reamed size mm proximal portion zimmer stemmed component point distal femoral cut evaluated intramedullary guide noted cut varus cut leaving us large deficit medial femoral cut elected large amount retic take medial condyle correct varus cut six degree valgus cut elected augment medial aspect take mm lateral condyle instead full point distal femoral cutting guide based intramedullary head placed care ensured aligned proper rotation external epicondylar axis pinned position approximately six degree valgus cut made allowed portion medial condyle removed distally anterior cut checked next using intramedullary guide anterior surface cutting block placed aligned us anterior cutting blockwe ensured rotation aligned epicondylar axis adequately aligned gave us external rotation pinned position new anterior cut made noted minimal bone taken surface slight portion medial anterior surface _______ removed chamfer cutting guide placed allowed us make box cut recut angled cuts distal femur placed pinned position care taken check proper rotation chamfer cuts recut noted anterior chamfers need cut take bone posterior chamfers remove bony aspects also taken posterior aspects condyles ossicle saw reciprocal saw used take notch cut open constrained component cuts taken guides removed trial component medial mm augment placed appeared adequate fit packed position appeared satisfactory point removed attention directed tibia intramedullary canal opened using proximal drill reamed appropriate size good _______ obtained point intramedullary guide used evaluate tibial cut appeared adequate however elected remove mm bone give us new fresh bony surface cutting guide placed adequate alignment checked intramedullary guide external alignment rod allowed us ensure proper external rotation tibial component point pinned position tibial cut made remove extra mm bone removed trial tibial stemmed component placed well trial augmented stemmed femoral component placed proper position mm articular surface placed knee taken range motion found better alignment satisfactory position elected take intraoperative xray point evaluate cut intraoperative xray demonstrates satisfactory cuts alignment prosthesis point trials removed patella examined rongeur used remove surrounding synovium patella evaluated found mild wear lateral aspect inferior butt however mild overall good position well fixed bone elected time maintain anatomic patella previously placed point joint reevaluated bone loose fragments removed noted posterior tightness mild osteophytes removed rongeurat time preparing canals tourniquet deflated due minutes approximately minutes get knee copiously irrigated suctioned dried tourniquet reinflated canals prepped cementing suctiondried cleaned tibial component cemented impacted position ensured adequately aligned proper external rotation alignment previously tried trial fixed secured extra cement removed attention directed femoral component stemmed femoral component impacted position cemented care ensured adequate position proper rotation size mm poly inserted provide compression taken extension held cement cured removed components evaluated excess cement removed well fixed size mm trial poly placed taken range motion found excellent range motion good stability elected time would go size mm poly gave us extra poly ware provide excellent contact throughout range motion final articular surface placed tightened position allow _______ secured knee reduced knee taken range motion patella tracking notouch technique adequately positioned point tourniquet deflated second time knee copiously irrigated suctioned dry bleeding cauterized using bovie cautery retinaculum repaired using ethibond figureofeight fashion reinforced running vicryl knee flexed noted patella tracking good alignment wound copiously irrigated suctioned dry drain placed prior retinaculum repair deep provide adequate drainage point subcutaneous tissue closed vicryl skin approximated skin clips sterile dressing adaptic x webril abds placed large dupre dressing placed entire lower extremity patient transferred back recovery supine positiondisposition patient tolerated procedure well complications transferred pacu satisfactory condition

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right failed total knee arthroplasty.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: ,Right failed total knee arthroplasty.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED: , Revision right total knee arthroplasty.,FIRST ANESTHESIA: , Spinal.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS: , Approximately 75 cc.,TOURNIQUET TIME: , 123 minutes. Then it was let down for approximately 15 minutes and then reinflated for another 26 minutes for a total of 149 minutes.,COMPONENTS: , A Zimmer NexGen Legacy knee size D right stemmed femoral component was used. A NexGen femoral component with a distal femoral augmented block, size 5 mm. A NexGen tibial component, size 3 mm was used. A size 14 mm constrained polyethylene surface was used as well. Original patellar component that the patient had was maintained.,COMPLICATIONS: ,None.,BRIEF HISTORY:, The patient is a 68-year-old female with a history of knee pain for 13 years. She had previous total knee arthroplasty and revision at an outside facility. She had continued pain, snapping, malalignment, difficulty with ambulation, and giving away and wished to undergo additional revision surgery.,PROCEDURE:, The patient was taken to the operative suite and placed on the operating table. Department of Anesthesia administered the spinal anesthetic. Once adequately anesthetized, the patient was placed in a supine position. Care was ensured and she was adequately secured and well padded in position. Once this was obtained, the right lower extremity was prepped and draped in the usual sterile fashion. Tourniquet was inflated to approximately 325 mmHg on the right thigh. At this point, an incision was made over her anterior previous knee scar taking this down to the subcutaneous tissue of the overlying retinaculum. A medial parapatellar arthrotomy was then made by using a second knife and this was taken both distally and proximally to allow us to sublux the patella on the lateral aspect to allow exposure to the joint surface. There was noted to be no evidence of purulence or gross clinical appearance of infection, however, intraoperative cultures were taken to asses this as well. At this point, the previous articular surface was then removed using an osteotome until this was left free and then removed. This was done without difficulty. Attention was then directed removing the femoral component. Osteotome was taken around each of the edges until this was gently lifted up and then a femoral extractor was placed around it and this was back flapped until this was easily removed. After this was performed, attention was then directed to the tibial component. An osteotome was again inserted around the surface and this was easily pried loose. There was noted to be minimal difficulty with this and did not appear to have adequate cement fixation. This was evaluated. The bone stalk appeared to be adequate, however, there were noted to be some deficits where we need to trim cement, so we elected to proceed with stemmed component. The attention was first directed to the femur and the femoral canal was opened up and superficially reamed up to a size 18 mm proximal portion for the Zimmer stemmed component. At this point, the distal femoral cut was evaluated with a intramedullary guide and this was noted to be cut in a varus cut leaving us a large deficit of the medial femoral cut. We elected because of this large amount of retic to take off the medial condyle to correct this varus cut to a six degree valgus cut. We elected to augment the medial aspect and take only 5 mm off of the lateral condyle instead of a full 10 to 12. At this point, the distal femoral cutting guide based on the intramedullary head was then placed. Care was ensured that this was aligned in proper rotation with the external epicondylar axis. Once this was pinned in position, approximately a six degree valgus cut was then made. This allowed a portion of the medial condyle to be removed distally. The anterior cut was checked next using the intramedullary guide. The anterior surface cutting block was then placed. This aligned us to anterior cutting block.,We ensured again that rotation was aligned with the epicondylar axis. Once this was adequately aligned with this and gave us some external rotation, this was pinned in position and new anterior cut was made. It was noted that minimal bone was taken off the surface, only a slight portion on the medial anterior surface. _______ was then removed and the chamfer cutting guide was then placed on. This allowed us to make a box cut and recut some of the angled cuts of the distal femur. Once this was placed and pinned in position. Care was then again taken to check that this was in proper rotation and then the chamfer cuts were recut. It was noted that the anterior chamfers did not need to be cut, take off no bone. The posterior chamfers did remove some bony aspects. This was also taken off some of the posterior aspects of the condyles and then the ossicle saw and reciprocal saw were used to take off a notch cut to open up a constrained component. After all these cuts were taken, the guides were then removed and the trial component with a medial 5 mm augment was then placed. This appeared to have an adequate fit and then packed in position. It appeared to be satisfactory. At this point, this was removed and attention was then directed to the tibia. The intramedullary canal was again opened up using a proximal drill and this was reamed to the appropriate size until good _______ was obtained. At this point, the intramedullary guide was used to evaluate a tibial cut. This appeared to be adequate, however, we elected to remove 2 mm of bone to give us a new fresh bony surface. The cutting guide was placed in adequate alignment and checked both the with intramedullary guide and an external alignment rod, which allowed us to ensure that we had proper external rotation of this tibial component. At this point, this was pinned in position and the tibial cut was made to remove an extra 2 mm of bone. This was again removed and a trial tibial stemmed component was then placed as well as the trial augmented stemmed femoral component. This was placed in a proper position. A 10 mm articular surface was placed in the knee and this was taken through range of motion. This was found to have better alignment and satisfactory position. We elected to take an intraoperative x-ray at this point, to evaluate our cut. The intraoperative x-ray demonstrates satisfactory cuts and alignment of the prosthesis. At this point, all trials were removed. The patella was then examined. The rongeur was used to remove the surrounding synovium. The patella was evaluated and found to have mild wear on the lateral aspect of the inferior butt, however, this was very mild and overall had a good position and was well fixed to the bone. It was elected at this time to maintain this anatomic patella that was previously placed. At this point, the joint again was reevaluated and any bone loose fragments removed. There was noted to be some posterior tightness and mild osteophytes. These were removed with a rongeur.,At this time, while preparing the canals, the tourniquet was deflated due to it being 123 minutes. Approximately 10 minutes did get by, as the knee was copiously irrigated and suctioned dried. The tourniquet was then reinflated. The canals were prepped for cementing. They were suction-dried and cleaned. The tibial component was cemented and then impacted into position and ensured it was adequately aligned in proper external rotation and alignment that was previously tried with the trial. Once this was fixed and secured, all extra cement was removed and attention was directed to the femoral component. The stemmed femoral component was then impacted in position and cemented. Again care was ensured that it was in adequate position and proper rotation. A size 14 mm poly was then inserted in between to provide compression. This was then taken through extension and held until cement cured. This was then removed and the components were evaluated. All excess cement was removed and they were well fixed. Size 14 mm trial Poly was then placed and this was taken through range of motion. This was found to have excellent range of motion and good stability. It was elected at this time that we would go with the size 14 mm Poly. This gave us extra Poly for ware and then provide excellent contact throughout the range of motion. The final articular surface was then placed and tightened into position to allow to _______ secured. The knee was then reduced and the knee was taken through range of motion. The patella was tracking with no-touch technique and adequately positioned. At this point, the tourniquet was deflated for second time and then the knee was copiously irrigated and suctioned dry. All bleeding was cauterized using a Bovie cautery. The retinaculum was then repaired using #1 Ethibond in a figure-of-eight fashion. This was reinforced with a running #2-0 Vicryl. The knee was then flexed and noted that the patella was tracking with good alignment. The wound was again copiously irrigated and suctioned dry. A drain was placed prior to retinaculum repair deep to this to provide adequate drainage. At this point, the subcutaneous tissue was closed with #2-0 Vicryl. Skin was approximated with skin clips. Sterile dressing of Adaptic, 4x4, Webril, and ABDs were then placed. A large Dupre dressing was then placed up the entire lower extremity. The patient was then transferred back to recovery in supine position.,DISPOSITION: , The patient tolerated the procedure well with no complications and transferred to PACU in satisfactory condition. ### Response: Orthopedic, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right flank subcutaneous mass.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right flank subcutaneous mass.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED: , Excision of soft tissue mass on the right flank.,ANESTHESIA: , Sedation with local.,INDICATIONS FOR PROCEDURE:, This 54-year-old male was evaluated in the office with a large right flank mass. He would like to have this removed.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE:, Consent was obtained after all risks and benefits were described. The patient was brought back into the operating room. The aforementioned anesthesia was given. Once the patient was properly anesthetized, the area was prepped and draped in the sterile fashion. With the area properly prepped and draped, a needle was used to localize the area directly above the mass on the patient's right flank. Then a #10 blade scalpel was used to make the incision approximately 4 cm to 5 cm in length just above the mass. The incision was extended down using electrocautery. The excision then had a Allis clamp placed on it and was retracted using sharp dissection and electrocautery was used to dissect the mass off the muscle. The mass was sent off to Pathology for investigation. Hemostasis maintained with electrocautery and then the subcutaneous fascia was closed using a #3-0 Vicryl suture in interrupted fashion and the skin was reapproximated using a #4-0 undyed Vicryl suture in a running subcuticular fashion. The patient's wound was cleaned. Steri-Strips were placed and sterile dressings were placed on top of this. The patient tolerated the procedure well and will reevaluate in the office in one week's time.

preoperative diagnosis right flank subcutaneous masspostoperative diagnosis right flank subcutaneous massprocedure performed excision soft tissue mass right flankanesthesia sedation localindications procedure yearold male evaluated office large right flank mass would like removeddescription procedure consent obtained risks benefits described patient brought back operating room aforementioned anesthesia given patient properly anesthetized area prepped draped sterile fashion area properly prepped draped needle used localize area directly mass patients right flank blade scalpel used make incision approximately cm cm length mass incision extended using electrocautery excision allis clamp placed retracted using sharp dissection electrocautery used dissect mass muscle mass sent pathology investigation hemostasis maintained electrocautery subcutaneous fascia closed using vicryl suture interrupted fashion skin reapproximated using undyed vicryl suture running subcuticular fashion patients wound cleaned steristrips placed sterile dressings placed top patient tolerated procedure well reevaluate office one weeks time

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right flank subcutaneous mass.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right flank subcutaneous mass.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED: , Excision of soft tissue mass on the right flank.,ANESTHESIA: , Sedation with local.,INDICATIONS FOR PROCEDURE:, This 54-year-old male was evaluated in the office with a large right flank mass. He would like to have this removed.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE:, Consent was obtained after all risks and benefits were described. The patient was brought back into the operating room. The aforementioned anesthesia was given. Once the patient was properly anesthetized, the area was prepped and draped in the sterile fashion. With the area properly prepped and draped, a needle was used to localize the area directly above the mass on the patient's right flank. Then a #10 blade scalpel was used to make the incision approximately 4 cm to 5 cm in length just above the mass. The incision was extended down using electrocautery. The excision then had a Allis clamp placed on it and was retracted using sharp dissection and electrocautery was used to dissect the mass off the muscle. The mass was sent off to Pathology for investigation. Hemostasis maintained with electrocautery and then the subcutaneous fascia was closed using a #3-0 Vicryl suture in interrupted fashion and the skin was reapproximated using a #4-0 undyed Vicryl suture in a running subcuticular fashion. The patient's wound was cleaned. Steri-Strips were placed and sterile dressings were placed on top of this. The patient tolerated the procedure well and will reevaluate in the office in one week's time. ### Response: Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right hand Dupuytren disease to the little finger.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: ,Right hand Dupuytren disease to the little finger.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED: ,Excision of Dupuytren disease of the right hand extending out to the proximal interphalangeal joint of the little finger.,COMPLICATIONS: ,None.,BLOOD LOSS: , Minimal.,ANESTHESIA: , Bier block.,INDICATIONS: ,The patient is a 51-year-old male with left Dupuytren disease, which is causing contractions both at the metacarpophalangeal and the PIP joint as well as significant discomfort.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: ,The patient was taken to the operating room, laid supine, administered a bier block, and prepped and draped in the sterile fashion. A zig-zag incision was made down the palmar surface of the little finger and under the palm up to the mid palm region. Skin flaps were elevated carefully, dissecting Dupuytren contracture off the undersurface of the flaps. Both neurovascular bundles were identified proximally in the hand and the Dupuytren disease fibrous band was divided proximally, which essentially returned to normal-appearing tissue. The neurovascular bundles were then dissected distally resecting everything medial to the 2 neurovascular bundles and above the flexor tendon sheath all the way out to the PIP joint of the finger where the Dupuytren disease stopped. The wound was irrigated. The neurovascular bundles rechecked with no evidence of any injury and the neurovascular bundles were not significantly involved in the Dupuytren disease. The incisions were closed with 5-0 nylon interrupted sutures.,The patient tolerated the procedure well and was taken to the PACU in good condition.

preoperative diagnosis right hand dupuytren disease little fingerpostoperative diagnosis right hand dupuytren disease little fingerprocedure performed excision dupuytren disease right hand extending proximal interphalangeal joint little fingercomplications noneblood loss minimalanesthesia bier blockindications patient yearold male left dupuytren disease causing contractions metacarpophalangeal pip joint well significant discomfortdescription procedure patient taken operating room laid supine administered bier block prepped draped sterile fashion zigzag incision made palmar surface little finger palm mid palm region skin flaps elevated carefully dissecting dupuytren contracture undersurface flaps neurovascular bundles identified proximally hand dupuytren disease fibrous band divided proximally essentially returned normalappearing tissue neurovascular bundles dissected distally resecting everything medial neurovascular bundles flexor tendon sheath way pip joint finger dupuytren disease stopped wound irrigated neurovascular bundles rechecked evidence injury neurovascular bundles significantly involved dupuytren disease incisions closed nylon interrupted suturesthe patient tolerated procedure well taken pacu good condition

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right hand Dupuytren disease to the little finger.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: ,Right hand Dupuytren disease to the little finger.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED: ,Excision of Dupuytren disease of the right hand extending out to the proximal interphalangeal joint of the little finger.,COMPLICATIONS: ,None.,BLOOD LOSS: , Minimal.,ANESTHESIA: , Bier block.,INDICATIONS: ,The patient is a 51-year-old male with left Dupuytren disease, which is causing contractions both at the metacarpophalangeal and the PIP joint as well as significant discomfort.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: ,The patient was taken to the operating room, laid supine, administered a bier block, and prepped and draped in the sterile fashion. A zig-zag incision was made down the palmar surface of the little finger and under the palm up to the mid palm region. Skin flaps were elevated carefully, dissecting Dupuytren contracture off the undersurface of the flaps. Both neurovascular bundles were identified proximally in the hand and the Dupuytren disease fibrous band was divided proximally, which essentially returned to normal-appearing tissue. The neurovascular bundles were then dissected distally resecting everything medial to the 2 neurovascular bundles and above the flexor tendon sheath all the way out to the PIP joint of the finger where the Dupuytren disease stopped. The wound was irrigated. The neurovascular bundles rechecked with no evidence of any injury and the neurovascular bundles were not significantly involved in the Dupuytren disease. The incisions were closed with 5-0 nylon interrupted sutures.,The patient tolerated the procedure well and was taken to the PACU in good condition. ### Response: Orthopedic, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right hemothorax.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right hemothorax.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED: , Insertion of a #32 French chest tube on the right hemithorax.,ANESTHESIA: , 1% Lidocaine and sedation.,INDICATIONS FOR PROCEDURE:, This is a 54-year-old female with a newly diagnosed carcinoma of the cervix. The patient is to have an Infuse-A-Port insertion today. Postoperatively from that, she started having a blood tinged pink frothy sputum. Chest x-ray was obtained and showed evidence of a hemothorax on the right hand side, opposite side of the Infuse-A-Port and a wider mediastinum. The decision was made to place a chest tube in the right hemithorax to allow for the patient to be stable for transfer out of the operating room.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: , The area was prepped and draped in the sterile fashion. The area was anesthetized with 1% Lidocaine solution. The patient was given sedation. A #10 blade scalpel was used to make an incision approximately 1.5 cm long. Then a curved scissor was used to dissect down to the level of the rib. A blunt peon was then used to again enter into the right hemithorax. Immediately a blood tinged effusion was released. The chest tube was placed and directed in a posterior and superior direction. The chest tube was hooked up to the Pleur-evac device which was ________ tip suction. The chest tube was tied in with a #0 silk suture in a U-stitch fashion. It was sutured in place with sterile dressing and silk tape. The patient tolerated this procedure well. We will obtain a chest x-ray in postop to ensure proper placement and continue to follow the patient very closely.

preoperative diagnosis right hemothoraxpostoperative diagnosis right hemothoraxprocedure performed insertion french chest tube right hemithoraxanesthesia lidocaine sedationindications procedure yearold female newly diagnosed carcinoma cervix patient infuseaport insertion today postoperatively started blood tinged pink frothy sputum chest xray obtained showed evidence hemothorax right hand side opposite side infuseaport wider mediastinum decision made place chest tube right hemithorax allow patient stable transfer operating roomdescription procedure area prepped draped sterile fashion area anesthetized lidocaine solution patient given sedation blade scalpel used make incision approximately cm long curved scissor used dissect level rib blunt peon used enter right hemithorax immediately blood tinged effusion released chest tube placed directed posterior superior direction chest tube hooked pleurevac device ________ tip suction chest tube tied silk suture ustitch fashion sutured place sterile dressing silk tape patient tolerated procedure well obtain chest xray postop ensure proper placement continue follow patient closely

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right hemothorax.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right hemothorax.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED: , Insertion of a #32 French chest tube on the right hemithorax.,ANESTHESIA: , 1% Lidocaine and sedation.,INDICATIONS FOR PROCEDURE:, This is a 54-year-old female with a newly diagnosed carcinoma of the cervix. The patient is to have an Infuse-A-Port insertion today. Postoperatively from that, she started having a blood tinged pink frothy sputum. Chest x-ray was obtained and showed evidence of a hemothorax on the right hand side, opposite side of the Infuse-A-Port and a wider mediastinum. The decision was made to place a chest tube in the right hemithorax to allow for the patient to be stable for transfer out of the operating room.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: , The area was prepped and draped in the sterile fashion. The area was anesthetized with 1% Lidocaine solution. The patient was given sedation. A #10 blade scalpel was used to make an incision approximately 1.5 cm long. Then a curved scissor was used to dissect down to the level of the rib. A blunt peon was then used to again enter into the right hemithorax. Immediately a blood tinged effusion was released. The chest tube was placed and directed in a posterior and superior direction. The chest tube was hooked up to the Pleur-evac device which was ________ tip suction. The chest tube was tied in with a #0 silk suture in a U-stitch fashion. It was sutured in place with sterile dressing and silk tape. The patient tolerated this procedure well. We will obtain a chest x-ray in postop to ensure proper placement and continue to follow the patient very closely. ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right hip osteoarthritis.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right hip osteoarthritis.,PROCEDURES PERFORMED: , Total hip replacement on the right side using the following components:,1. Zimmer trilogy acetabular system 10-degree elevated rim located at the 12 o'clock position.,2. Trabecular metal modular acetabular system 48 mm in diameter.,3. Femoral head 32 mm diameter +0 mm neck length.,4. Alloclassic SL offset stem uncemented for taper.,ANESTHESIA: , Spinal.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE IN DETAIL:, The patient was brought into the operating room and was placed on the operative table in a lateral decubitus position with the right side up. After review of allergies, antibiotics were administered and time out was performed. The right lower extremity was prepped and draped in a sterile fashion. A 15 cm to 25 cm in length, an incision was made over the greater trochanter. This was angled posteriorly. Access to the tensor fascia lata was performed. This was incised with the use of scissors. Gluteus maximus was separated. The bursa around the hip was identified, and the bleeders were coagulated with the use of Bovie. Hemostasis was achieved. The piriformis fossa was identified, and the piriformis fossa tendon was elevated with the use of a Cobb. It was detached from the piriformis fossa and tagged with 2-0 Vicryl. Access to the capsule was performed. The capsule was excised from the posterior and superior aspects. It was released also in the front with the use of a Mayo scissors. The hip was then dislocated. With the use of an oscillating saw, the femoral neck cut was performed. The acetabulum was then visualized and debrided from soft tissues and osteophytes. Reaming was initiated and completed for a 48 mm diameter cap without complications. The trial component was put in place and was found to be stable in an anatomic position. The actual component was then impacted in the acetabulum. A 10-degree lip polyethylene was also placed in the acetabular cap. Our attention was then focused to the femur. With the use of a cookie cutter, the femoral canal was accessed. The broaching process was initiated for No.4 trial component. Trialing of the hip with the hip flexed at 90 degrees and internally rotated to 30 degrees did not demonstrate any obvious instability or dislocation. In addition, in full extension and external rotation, there was no dislocation. The actual component was inserted in place and hemostasis was achieved again. The wound was irrigated with normal saline. The wound was then closed in layers. Before performing that the medium-sized Hemovac drain was placed in the wound. The tensor fascia lata was closed with 0 PDS and the wound was closed with 2-0 Monocryl. Staples were used for the skin. The patient recovered from anesthesia without complications.,EBL: , 50 mL.,IV FLUIDS: , 2 liters.,DRAINS: , One medium-sized Hemovac.,COMPLICATIONS: , None.,DISPOSITION: , The patient was transferred to the PACU in stable condition. She will be weightbearing as tolerated to the right lower extremity with posterior hip precautions. We will start the DVT prophylaxis after the removal of the epidural catheter.

preoperative diagnosis right hip osteoarthritispostoperative diagnosis right hip osteoarthritisprocedures performed total hip replacement right side using following components zimmer trilogy acetabular system degree elevated rim located oclock position trabecular metal modular acetabular system mm diameter femoral head mm diameter mm neck length alloclassic sl offset stem uncemented taperanesthesia spinaldescription procedure detail patient brought operating room placed operative table lateral decubitus position right side review allergies antibiotics administered time performed right lower extremity prepped draped sterile fashion cm cm length incision made greater trochanter angled posteriorly access tensor fascia lata performed incised use scissors gluteus maximus separated bursa around hip identified bleeders coagulated use bovie hemostasis achieved piriformis fossa identified piriformis fossa tendon elevated use cobb detached piriformis fossa tagged vicryl access capsule performed capsule excised posterior superior aspects released also front use mayo scissors hip dislocated use oscillating saw femoral neck cut performed acetabulum visualized debrided soft tissues osteophytes reaming initiated completed mm diameter cap without complications trial component put place found stable anatomic position actual component impacted acetabulum degree lip polyethylene also placed acetabular cap attention focused femur use cookie cutter femoral canal accessed broaching process initiated trial component trialing hip hip flexed degrees internally rotated degrees demonstrate obvious instability dislocation addition full extension external rotation dislocation actual component inserted place hemostasis achieved wound irrigated normal saline wound closed layers performing mediumsized hemovac drain placed wound tensor fascia lata closed pds wound closed monocryl staples used skin patient recovered anesthesia without complicationsebl mliv fluids litersdrains one mediumsized hemovaccomplications nonedisposition patient transferred pacu stable condition weightbearing tolerated right lower extremity posterior hip precautions start dvt prophylaxis removal epidural catheter

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right hip osteoarthritis.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right hip osteoarthritis.,PROCEDURES PERFORMED: , Total hip replacement on the right side using the following components:,1. Zimmer trilogy acetabular system 10-degree elevated rim located at the 12 o'clock position.,2. Trabecular metal modular acetabular system 48 mm in diameter.,3. Femoral head 32 mm diameter +0 mm neck length.,4. Alloclassic SL offset stem uncemented for taper.,ANESTHESIA: , Spinal.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE IN DETAIL:, The patient was brought into the operating room and was placed on the operative table in a lateral decubitus position with the right side up. After review of allergies, antibiotics were administered and time out was performed. The right lower extremity was prepped and draped in a sterile fashion. A 15 cm to 25 cm in length, an incision was made over the greater trochanter. This was angled posteriorly. Access to the tensor fascia lata was performed. This was incised with the use of scissors. Gluteus maximus was separated. The bursa around the hip was identified, and the bleeders were coagulated with the use of Bovie. Hemostasis was achieved. The piriformis fossa was identified, and the piriformis fossa tendon was elevated with the use of a Cobb. It was detached from the piriformis fossa and tagged with 2-0 Vicryl. Access to the capsule was performed. The capsule was excised from the posterior and superior aspects. It was released also in the front with the use of a Mayo scissors. The hip was then dislocated. With the use of an oscillating saw, the femoral neck cut was performed. The acetabulum was then visualized and debrided from soft tissues and osteophytes. Reaming was initiated and completed for a 48 mm diameter cap without complications. The trial component was put in place and was found to be stable in an anatomic position. The actual component was then impacted in the acetabulum. A 10-degree lip polyethylene was also placed in the acetabular cap. Our attention was then focused to the femur. With the use of a cookie cutter, the femoral canal was accessed. The broaching process was initiated for No.4 trial component. Trialing of the hip with the hip flexed at 90 degrees and internally rotated to 30 degrees did not demonstrate any obvious instability or dislocation. In addition, in full extension and external rotation, there was no dislocation. The actual component was inserted in place and hemostasis was achieved again. The wound was irrigated with normal saline. The wound was then closed in layers. Before performing that the medium-sized Hemovac drain was placed in the wound. The tensor fascia lata was closed with 0 PDS and the wound was closed with 2-0 Monocryl. Staples were used for the skin. The patient recovered from anesthesia without complications.,EBL: , 50 mL.,IV FLUIDS: , 2 liters.,DRAINS: , One medium-sized Hemovac.,COMPLICATIONS: , None.,DISPOSITION: , The patient was transferred to the PACU in stable condition. She will be weightbearing as tolerated to the right lower extremity with posterior hip precautions. We will start the DVT prophylaxis after the removal of the epidural catheter. ### Response: Orthopedic, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right inguinal hernia. ,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Right direct inguinal hernia. ,PROCEDURE:, Right direct inguinal hernia repair with PHS mesh system. ,ANESTHESIA:, General with endotracheal intubation. ,PROCEDURE IN DETAIL: , The patient was taken to the operating room and placed supine on the operating table. General anesthesia was administered with endotracheal intubation. The Right groin and abdomen were prepped and draped in the standard sterile surgical fashion. An incision was made approximately 1 fingerbreadth above the pubic tubercle and in a skin crease. Dissection was taken down through the skin and subcutaneous tissue. Scarpa's fascia was divided, and the external ring was located. The external oblique was divided from the external ring up towards the anterior superior iliac spine. The cord structures were then encircled. Careful inspection of the cord structures did not reveal any indirect sac along the cord structures. I did, however, feel a direct sac with a direct defect. I opened the floor of the inguinal canal and dissected out the preperitoneal space at the direct sac and cut out the direct sac. Once I cleared out the preperitoneal space, I placed a PHS mesh system with a posterior mesh into the preperitoneal space, and I made sure that it laid flat along Cooper's ligament and covered the myopectineal orifice. I then tucked the extended portion of the anterior mesh underneath the external oblique between the external oblique and the internal oblique, and I then tacked the medial portion of the mesh to the pubic tubercle with a 0 Ethibond suture. I tacked the superior portion of the mesh to the internal oblique and the inferior portion of the mesh to the shelving edge of the inguinal ligament. I cut a hole in the mesh in order to incorporate the cord structures and recreated the internal ring, making sure that it was not too tight so that it did not strangulate the cord structures. I then closed the external oblique with a running 3-0 Vicryl. I closed the Scarpa's with interrupted 3-0 Vicryl, and I closed the skin with a running Monocril. Sponge, instrument and needle counts were correct at the end of the case. The patient tolerated the procedure well and without any complications.

preoperative diagnosis right inguinal hernia postoperative diagnosis right direct inguinal hernia procedure right direct inguinal hernia repair phs mesh system anesthesia general endotracheal intubation procedure detail patient taken operating room placed supine operating table general anesthesia administered endotracheal intubation right groin abdomen prepped draped standard sterile surgical fashion incision made approximately fingerbreadth pubic tubercle skin crease dissection taken skin subcutaneous tissue scarpas fascia divided external ring located external oblique divided external ring towards anterior superior iliac spine cord structures encircled careful inspection cord structures reveal indirect sac along cord structures however feel direct sac direct defect opened floor inguinal canal dissected preperitoneal space direct sac cut direct sac cleared preperitoneal space placed phs mesh system posterior mesh preperitoneal space made sure laid flat along coopers ligament covered myopectineal orifice tucked extended portion anterior mesh underneath external oblique external oblique internal oblique tacked medial portion mesh pubic tubercle ethibond suture tacked superior portion mesh internal oblique inferior portion mesh shelving edge inguinal ligament cut hole mesh order incorporate cord structures recreated internal ring making sure tight strangulate cord structures closed external oblique running vicryl closed scarpas interrupted vicryl closed skin running monocril sponge instrument needle counts correct end case patient tolerated procedure well without complications

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right inguinal hernia. ,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Right direct inguinal hernia. ,PROCEDURE:, Right direct inguinal hernia repair with PHS mesh system. ,ANESTHESIA:, General with endotracheal intubation. ,PROCEDURE IN DETAIL: , The patient was taken to the operating room and placed supine on the operating table. General anesthesia was administered with endotracheal intubation. The Right groin and abdomen were prepped and draped in the standard sterile surgical fashion. An incision was made approximately 1 fingerbreadth above the pubic tubercle and in a skin crease. Dissection was taken down through the skin and subcutaneous tissue. Scarpa's fascia was divided, and the external ring was located. The external oblique was divided from the external ring up towards the anterior superior iliac spine. The cord structures were then encircled. Careful inspection of the cord structures did not reveal any indirect sac along the cord structures. I did, however, feel a direct sac with a direct defect. I opened the floor of the inguinal canal and dissected out the preperitoneal space at the direct sac and cut out the direct sac. Once I cleared out the preperitoneal space, I placed a PHS mesh system with a posterior mesh into the preperitoneal space, and I made sure that it laid flat along Cooper's ligament and covered the myopectineal orifice. I then tucked the extended portion of the anterior mesh underneath the external oblique between the external oblique and the internal oblique, and I then tacked the medial portion of the mesh to the pubic tubercle with a 0 Ethibond suture. I tacked the superior portion of the mesh to the internal oblique and the inferior portion of the mesh to the shelving edge of the inguinal ligament. I cut a hole in the mesh in order to incorporate the cord structures and recreated the internal ring, making sure that it was not too tight so that it did not strangulate the cord structures. I then closed the external oblique with a running 3-0 Vicryl. I closed the Scarpa's with interrupted 3-0 Vicryl, and I closed the skin with a running Monocril. Sponge, instrument and needle counts were correct at the end of the case. The patient tolerated the procedure well and without any complications. ### Response: Surgery, Urology

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right inguinal hernia.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Direct right inguinal hernia.,TITLE OF PROCEDURE: , Marlex repair of right inguinal hernia.,ANESTHESIA:, Spinal.,PROCEDURE IN DETAIL:, The patient was taken to the operative suite, placed on the table in the supine position, and given a spinal anesthetic. The right inguinal region was shaved and prepped and draped in a routine sterile fashion. The patient received 1 gm of Ancef IV push.,Transverse incision was made in the intraabdominal crease and carried through skin and subcutaneous tissue. The external oblique fascia was exposed and incised down to and through the external inguinal ring. The spermatic cord and hernia sac were dissected bluntly off the undersurface of the external oblique fascia exposing the attenuated floor of the inguinal canal. The cord was surrounded with a Penrose drain. The hernia sac was separated from the cord structures. The floor of the inguinal canal, which consisted of attenuated transversalis fascia, was imbricated upon itself with a running locked suture of 2-0 Prolene. Marlex patch 1 x 4 in dimension was trimmed to an appropriate shape with a defect to accommodate the cord. It was placed around the cord and sutured to itself with 2-0 Prolene. The patch was then sutured medially to the pubic tubercle, inferiorly to Cooper's ligament and inguinal ligaments, and superiorly to conjoined tendon using 2-0 Prolene. The area was irrigated with saline solution, and 0.5% Marcaine with epinephrine was injected to provide prolonged postoperative pain relief. The cord was returned to its position. External oblique fascia was closed with a running 2-0 PDS, subcu with 2-0 Vicryl, and skin with running subdermal 4-0 Vicryl and Steri-Strips. Sponge and needle counts were correct. Sterile dressing was applied.

preoperative diagnosis right inguinal herniapostoperative diagnosis direct right inguinal herniatitle procedure marlex repair right inguinal herniaanesthesia spinalprocedure detail patient taken operative suite placed table supine position given spinal anesthetic right inguinal region shaved prepped draped routine sterile fashion patient received gm ancef iv pushtransverse incision made intraabdominal crease carried skin subcutaneous tissue external oblique fascia exposed incised external inguinal ring spermatic cord hernia sac dissected bluntly undersurface external oblique fascia exposing attenuated floor inguinal canal cord surrounded penrose drain hernia sac separated cord structures floor inguinal canal consisted attenuated transversalis fascia imbricated upon running locked suture prolene marlex patch x dimension trimmed appropriate shape defect accommodate cord placed around cord sutured prolene patch sutured medially pubic tubercle inferiorly coopers ligament inguinal ligaments superiorly conjoined tendon using prolene area irrigated saline solution marcaine epinephrine injected provide prolonged postoperative pain relief cord returned position external oblique fascia closed running pds subcu vicryl skin running subdermal vicryl steristrips sponge needle counts correct sterile dressing applied

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right inguinal hernia.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Direct right inguinal hernia.,TITLE OF PROCEDURE: , Marlex repair of right inguinal hernia.,ANESTHESIA:, Spinal.,PROCEDURE IN DETAIL:, The patient was taken to the operative suite, placed on the table in the supine position, and given a spinal anesthetic. The right inguinal region was shaved and prepped and draped in a routine sterile fashion. The patient received 1 gm of Ancef IV push.,Transverse incision was made in the intraabdominal crease and carried through skin and subcutaneous tissue. The external oblique fascia was exposed and incised down to and through the external inguinal ring. The spermatic cord and hernia sac were dissected bluntly off the undersurface of the external oblique fascia exposing the attenuated floor of the inguinal canal. The cord was surrounded with a Penrose drain. The hernia sac was separated from the cord structures. The floor of the inguinal canal, which consisted of attenuated transversalis fascia, was imbricated upon itself with a running locked suture of 2-0 Prolene. Marlex patch 1 x 4 in dimension was trimmed to an appropriate shape with a defect to accommodate the cord. It was placed around the cord and sutured to itself with 2-0 Prolene. The patch was then sutured medially to the pubic tubercle, inferiorly to Cooper's ligament and inguinal ligaments, and superiorly to conjoined tendon using 2-0 Prolene. The area was irrigated with saline solution, and 0.5% Marcaine with epinephrine was injected to provide prolonged postoperative pain relief. The cord was returned to its position. External oblique fascia was closed with a running 2-0 PDS, subcu with 2-0 Vicryl, and skin with running subdermal 4-0 Vicryl and Steri-Strips. Sponge and needle counts were correct. Sterile dressing was applied. ### Response: Surgery, Urology

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right lateral base of tongue lesion, probable cancer.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right lateral base of tongue lesion, probable cancer.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED: ,Excisional biopsy with primary closure of a 4 mm right lateral base of tongue lesion.,ANESTHESIA: , General.,FINDINGS: , An ulceration in the right lateral base of tongue region. This was completely excised.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS:, Less than 5 mL.,FLUIDS: , Crystalloid only.,COMPLICATIONS:, None.,DRAINS:, None.,CONDITION:, Stable.,PROCEDURE: ,The patient placed supine in position under general anesthesia. First a Sweetheart gag was placed in the patient's mouth and the mouth was elevated. The lesion in the tongue could be seen. Then, it was injected with 1% lidocaine and 1:100,00 epinephrine. After 5 minutes of waiting, then an elliptical incision was made around this mass with electrocautery and then it was sharply dissected off the muscular layer and removed in total. Suction cautery was used for hemostasis. Then, 3 simple interrupted #4-0 Vicryl sutures were used to close the wound and procedure was then terminated at that time.

preoperative diagnosis right lateral base tongue lesion probable cancerpostoperative diagnosis right lateral base tongue lesion probable cancerprocedure performed excisional biopsy primary closure mm right lateral base tongue lesionanesthesia generalfindings ulceration right lateral base tongue region completely excisedestimated blood loss less mlfluids crystalloid onlycomplications nonedrains nonecondition stableprocedure patient placed supine position general anesthesia first sweetheart gag placed patients mouth mouth elevated lesion tongue could seen injected lidocaine epinephrine minutes waiting elliptical incision made around mass electrocautery sharply dissected muscular layer removed total suction cautery used hemostasis simple interrupted vicryl sutures used close wound procedure terminated time

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right lateral base of tongue lesion, probable cancer.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right lateral base of tongue lesion, probable cancer.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED: ,Excisional biopsy with primary closure of a 4 mm right lateral base of tongue lesion.,ANESTHESIA: , General.,FINDINGS: , An ulceration in the right lateral base of tongue region. This was completely excised.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS:, Less than 5 mL.,FLUIDS: , Crystalloid only.,COMPLICATIONS:, None.,DRAINS:, None.,CONDITION:, Stable.,PROCEDURE: ,The patient placed supine in position under general anesthesia. First a Sweetheart gag was placed in the patient's mouth and the mouth was elevated. The lesion in the tongue could be seen. Then, it was injected with 1% lidocaine and 1:100,00 epinephrine. After 5 minutes of waiting, then an elliptical incision was made around this mass with electrocautery and then it was sharply dissected off the muscular layer and removed in total. Suction cautery was used for hemostasis. Then, 3 simple interrupted #4-0 Vicryl sutures were used to close the wound and procedure was then terminated at that time. ### Response: Hematology - Oncology, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right lower pole renal stone and possibly infected stent.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right lower pole renal stone and possibly infected stent.,OPERATION:, Cysto stent removal.,ANESTHESIA:, Local MAC.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS: , Minimal.,FLUIDS: , Crystalloid.,MEDICATIONS: , The patient was on vancomycin and Levaquin was given x1 dose. The patient was on vancomycin for the last 5 days.,BRIEF HISTORY: ,The patient is a 53-year-old female who presented with Enterococcus urosepsis. CT scan showed a lower pole stone with a stent in place. The stent was placed about 2 months ago, but when patient came in with a possibly UPJ stone with fevers of unknown etiology. The patient had a stent placed at that time due to the fevers, thinking that this was an urospetic stone. There was some pus that came out. The patient was cultured; actually it was negative at that time. The patient subsequently was found to have lower extremity DVT and then was started on Coumadin. The patient cannot be taken off Coumadin for the next 6 months due to the significant swelling and high risk for PE. The repeat films were taken which showed the stone had migrated into the pole.,The stent was intact. The patient subsequently developed recurrent UTIs and Enterococcus in the urine with fevers. The patient was admitted for IV antibiotics since the patient could not really tolerate penicillin due to allergy and due to patient being on Coumadin, Cipro, and Levaquin where treatment was little bit more complicated. Due to drug interaction, the patient was admitted for IV antibiotic treatment. The thinking was that either the stone or the stent is infected, since the stone is pretty small in size, the stent is very likely possibility that it could have been infected and now it needs to be removed. Since the stone is not obstructing, there is no reason to replace the stent at this time. We are unable to do the ureteroscopy or the shock-wave lithotripsy when the patient is fully anticoagulated. So, the best option at this time is to probably wait and perform the ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy when the patient is allowed to off her Coumadin, which would be probably about 4 months down the road.,Plan is to get rid of the stent and improve patient's urinary symptoms and to get rid of the infection and we will worry about the stone at later point.,DETAILS OF THE OR: , Consent had been obtained from the patient. Risks, benefits, and options were discussed. Risk of anesthesia, bleeding, infection, pain, MI, DVT, and PE were discussed. The patient understood all the risks and benefits of removing the stent and wanted to proceed. The patient was brought to the OR. The patient was placed in dorsal lithotomy position. The patient was given some IV pain meds. The patient had received vancomycin and Levaquin preop. Cystoscopy was performed using graspers. The stent was removed without difficulty. Plan was for repeat cultures and continuation of the IV antibiotics.

preoperative diagnosis right lower pole renal stone possibly infected stentpostoperative diagnosis right lower pole renal stone possibly infected stentoperation cysto stent removalanesthesia local macestimated blood loss minimalfluids crystalloidmedications patient vancomycin levaquin given x dose patient vancomycin last daysbrief history patient yearold female presented enterococcus urosepsis ct scan showed lower pole stone stent place stent placed months ago patient came possibly upj stone fevers unknown etiology patient stent placed time due fevers thinking urospetic stone pus came patient cultured actually negative time patient subsequently found lower extremity dvt started coumadin patient cannot taken coumadin next months due significant swelling high risk pe repeat films taken showed stone migrated polethe stent intact patient subsequently developed recurrent utis enterococcus urine fevers patient admitted iv antibiotics since patient could really tolerate penicillin due allergy due patient coumadin cipro levaquin treatment little bit complicated due drug interaction patient admitted iv antibiotic treatment thinking either stone stent infected since stone pretty small size stent likely possibility could infected needs removed since stone obstructing reason replace stent time unable ureteroscopy shockwave lithotripsy patient fully anticoagulated best option time probably wait perform ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy patient allowed coumadin would probably months roadplan get rid stent improve patients urinary symptoms get rid infection worry stone later pointdetails consent obtained patient risks benefits options discussed risk anesthesia bleeding infection pain mi dvt pe discussed patient understood risks benefits removing stent wanted proceed patient brought patient placed dorsal lithotomy position patient given iv pain meds patient received vancomycin levaquin preop cystoscopy performed using graspers stent removed without difficulty plan repeat cultures continuation iv antibiotics

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right lower pole renal stone and possibly infected stent.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right lower pole renal stone and possibly infected stent.,OPERATION:, Cysto stent removal.,ANESTHESIA:, Local MAC.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS: , Minimal.,FLUIDS: , Crystalloid.,MEDICATIONS: , The patient was on vancomycin and Levaquin was given x1 dose. The patient was on vancomycin for the last 5 days.,BRIEF HISTORY: ,The patient is a 53-year-old female who presented with Enterococcus urosepsis. CT scan showed a lower pole stone with a stent in place. The stent was placed about 2 months ago, but when patient came in with a possibly UPJ stone with fevers of unknown etiology. The patient had a stent placed at that time due to the fevers, thinking that this was an urospetic stone. There was some pus that came out. The patient was cultured; actually it was negative at that time. The patient subsequently was found to have lower extremity DVT and then was started on Coumadin. The patient cannot be taken off Coumadin for the next 6 months due to the significant swelling and high risk for PE. The repeat films were taken which showed the stone had migrated into the pole.,The stent was intact. The patient subsequently developed recurrent UTIs and Enterococcus in the urine with fevers. The patient was admitted for IV antibiotics since the patient could not really tolerate penicillin due to allergy and due to patient being on Coumadin, Cipro, and Levaquin where treatment was little bit more complicated. Due to drug interaction, the patient was admitted for IV antibiotic treatment. The thinking was that either the stone or the stent is infected, since the stone is pretty small in size, the stent is very likely possibility that it could have been infected and now it needs to be removed. Since the stone is not obstructing, there is no reason to replace the stent at this time. We are unable to do the ureteroscopy or the shock-wave lithotripsy when the patient is fully anticoagulated. So, the best option at this time is to probably wait and perform the ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy when the patient is allowed to off her Coumadin, which would be probably about 4 months down the road.,Plan is to get rid of the stent and improve patient's urinary symptoms and to get rid of the infection and we will worry about the stone at later point.,DETAILS OF THE OR: , Consent had been obtained from the patient. Risks, benefits, and options were discussed. Risk of anesthesia, bleeding, infection, pain, MI, DVT, and PE were discussed. The patient understood all the risks and benefits of removing the stent and wanted to proceed. The patient was brought to the OR. The patient was placed in dorsal lithotomy position. The patient was given some IV pain meds. The patient had received vancomycin and Levaquin preop. Cystoscopy was performed using graspers. The stent was removed without difficulty. Plan was for repeat cultures and continuation of the IV antibiotics. ### Response: Nephrology, Surgery, Urology

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right lower quadrant abdominal pain, rule out acute appendicitis.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Acute suppurative appendicitis.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED:,1. Diagnostic laparoscopy.,2. Laparoscopic appendectomy.,ANESTHESIA: , General endotracheal and injectable 1% lidocaine and 0.25% Marcaine.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS: , Minimal.,SPECIMEN: , Appendix.,COMPLICATIONS: , None.,BRIEF HISTORY: , This is a 37-year-old Caucasian female presented to ABCD General Hospital with progressively worsening suprapubic and right lower quadrant abdominal pain, which progressed throughout its course starting approximately 12 hours prior to presentation. She admits to some nausea associated with it. There have been no fevers, chills, and/or genitourinary symptoms. The patient had right lower quadrant tenderness with rebound and percussion tenderness in the right lower quadrant. She had a leukocytosis of 12.8. She did undergo a CT of the abdomen and pelvis, which was non diagnostic for an acute appendicitis. Given the severity of her abdominal examination and her persistence of her symptoms, we recommend the patient undergo diagnostic laparoscopy with probable need for laparoscopic appendectomy and possible open appendectomy. The risks, benefits, complications of the procedure, she gave us informed consent to proceed.,OPERATIVE FINDINGS: ,Exploration of the abdomen via laparoscopy revealed an appendix with suppurative fluid surrounding it, it was slightly enlarged. The left ovary revealed some follicular cysts. There was no evidence of adnexal masses and/or torsion of the fallopian tubes. The uterus revealed no evidence of mass and/or fibroid tumors. The remainder of the abdomen was unremarkable.,OPERATIVE PROCEDURE: , The patient was brought to the operative suite, placed in the supine position. The abdomen was prepped and draped in the normal sterile fashion with Betadine solution. The patient underwent general endotracheal anesthesia. The patient also received a preoperative dose of Ancef 1 gram IV. After adequate sedation was achieved, a #10 blade scalpel was used to make an infraumbilical transverse incision utilizing a Veress needle. Veress needle was inserted into the abdomen and the abdomen was insufflated approximately 15 mmHg. Once the abdomen was sufficiently insufflated, a 10 mm bladed trocar was inserted into the abdomen without difficulty. A video laparoscope was inserted into the infraumbilical trocar site and the abdomen was explored. Next, a 5 mm port was inserted in the midclavicular line of the right upper quadrant region. This was inserted under direct visualization. Finally, a suprapubic 12 mm portal was created. This was performed with #10 blade scalpel to create a transverse incision. A bladed trocar was inserted into the suprapubic region. This was done again under direct visualization. Maryland dissector was inserted into the suprapubic region and a window was created between the appendix and mesoappendix at the base of the cecum. This was done while the 5 mm trocar was used to grasp the middle portion of the appendix and retracted anteriorly. Utilizing a endovascular stapling device, the appendix was transected and doubly stapled with this device. Next, the mesoappendix was doubly stapled and transected with the endovascular stapling device. The staple line was visualized and there was no evidence of bleeding. The abdomen was fully irrigated with copious amounts of normal saline. The abdomen was then aspirated. There was no evidence of bleeding. All ports were removed under direct visualization. No evidence of bleeding from the port sites. The infraumbilical and suprapubic ports were then closed. The fascias were then closed with #0-Vicryl suture on a UR6 needle. Once the fascias were closed, all incisions were closed with #4-0 undyed Vicryl. The areas were cleaned, Steri-Strips were placed across the wound. Sterile dressing was applied.,The patient tolerated the procedure well. She was extubated following the procedure, returned to Postanesthesia Care Unit in stable condition. She will be admitted to General Medical Floor and she will be followed closely in the early postoperative course.

preoperative diagnosis right lower quadrant abdominal pain rule acute appendicitispostoperative diagnosis acute suppurative appendicitisprocedure performed diagnostic laparoscopy laparoscopic appendectomyanesthesia general endotracheal injectable lidocaine marcaineestimated blood loss minimalspecimen appendixcomplications nonebrief history yearold caucasian female presented abcd general hospital progressively worsening suprapubic right lower quadrant abdominal pain progressed throughout course starting approximately hours prior presentation admits nausea associated fevers chills andor genitourinary symptoms patient right lower quadrant tenderness rebound percussion tenderness right lower quadrant leukocytosis undergo ct abdomen pelvis non diagnostic acute appendicitis given severity abdominal examination persistence symptoms recommend patient undergo diagnostic laparoscopy probable need laparoscopic appendectomy possible open appendectomy risks benefits complications procedure gave us informed consent proceedoperative findings exploration abdomen via laparoscopy revealed appendix suppurative fluid surrounding slightly enlarged left ovary revealed follicular cysts evidence adnexal masses andor torsion fallopian tubes uterus revealed evidence mass andor fibroid tumors remainder abdomen unremarkableoperative procedure patient brought operative suite placed supine position abdomen prepped draped normal sterile fashion betadine solution patient underwent general endotracheal anesthesia patient also received preoperative dose ancef gram iv adequate sedation achieved blade scalpel used make infraumbilical transverse incision utilizing veress needle veress needle inserted abdomen abdomen insufflated approximately mmhg abdomen sufficiently insufflated mm bladed trocar inserted abdomen without difficulty video laparoscope inserted infraumbilical trocar site abdomen explored next mm port inserted midclavicular line right upper quadrant region inserted direct visualization finally suprapubic mm portal created performed blade scalpel create transverse incision bladed trocar inserted suprapubic region done direct visualization maryland dissector inserted suprapubic region window created appendix mesoappendix base cecum done mm trocar used grasp middle portion appendix retracted anteriorly utilizing endovascular stapling device appendix transected doubly stapled device next mesoappendix doubly stapled transected endovascular stapling device staple line visualized evidence bleeding abdomen fully irrigated copious amounts normal saline abdomen aspirated evidence bleeding ports removed direct visualization evidence bleeding port sites infraumbilical suprapubic ports closed fascias closed vicryl suture ur needle fascias closed incisions closed undyed vicryl areas cleaned steristrips placed across wound sterile dressing appliedthe patient tolerated procedure well extubated following procedure returned postanesthesia care unit stable condition admitted general medical floor followed closely early postoperative course

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right lower quadrant abdominal pain, rule out acute appendicitis.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Acute suppurative appendicitis.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED:,1. Diagnostic laparoscopy.,2. Laparoscopic appendectomy.,ANESTHESIA: , General endotracheal and injectable 1% lidocaine and 0.25% Marcaine.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS: , Minimal.,SPECIMEN: , Appendix.,COMPLICATIONS: , None.,BRIEF HISTORY: , This is a 37-year-old Caucasian female presented to ABCD General Hospital with progressively worsening suprapubic and right lower quadrant abdominal pain, which progressed throughout its course starting approximately 12 hours prior to presentation. She admits to some nausea associated with it. There have been no fevers, chills, and/or genitourinary symptoms. The patient had right lower quadrant tenderness with rebound and percussion tenderness in the right lower quadrant. She had a leukocytosis of 12.8. She did undergo a CT of the abdomen and pelvis, which was non diagnostic for an acute appendicitis. Given the severity of her abdominal examination and her persistence of her symptoms, we recommend the patient undergo diagnostic laparoscopy with probable need for laparoscopic appendectomy and possible open appendectomy. The risks, benefits, complications of the procedure, she gave us informed consent to proceed.,OPERATIVE FINDINGS: ,Exploration of the abdomen via laparoscopy revealed an appendix with suppurative fluid surrounding it, it was slightly enlarged. The left ovary revealed some follicular cysts. There was no evidence of adnexal masses and/or torsion of the fallopian tubes. The uterus revealed no evidence of mass and/or fibroid tumors. The remainder of the abdomen was unremarkable.,OPERATIVE PROCEDURE: , The patient was brought to the operative suite, placed in the supine position. The abdomen was prepped and draped in the normal sterile fashion with Betadine solution. The patient underwent general endotracheal anesthesia. The patient also received a preoperative dose of Ancef 1 gram IV. After adequate sedation was achieved, a #10 blade scalpel was used to make an infraumbilical transverse incision utilizing a Veress needle. Veress needle was inserted into the abdomen and the abdomen was insufflated approximately 15 mmHg. Once the abdomen was sufficiently insufflated, a 10 mm bladed trocar was inserted into the abdomen without difficulty. A video laparoscope was inserted into the infraumbilical trocar site and the abdomen was explored. Next, a 5 mm port was inserted in the midclavicular line of the right upper quadrant region. This was inserted under direct visualization. Finally, a suprapubic 12 mm portal was created. This was performed with #10 blade scalpel to create a transverse incision. A bladed trocar was inserted into the suprapubic region. This was done again under direct visualization. Maryland dissector was inserted into the suprapubic region and a window was created between the appendix and mesoappendix at the base of the cecum. This was done while the 5 mm trocar was used to grasp the middle portion of the appendix and retracted anteriorly. Utilizing a endovascular stapling device, the appendix was transected and doubly stapled with this device. Next, the mesoappendix was doubly stapled and transected with the endovascular stapling device. The staple line was visualized and there was no evidence of bleeding. The abdomen was fully irrigated with copious amounts of normal saline. The abdomen was then aspirated. There was no evidence of bleeding. All ports were removed under direct visualization. No evidence of bleeding from the port sites. The infraumbilical and suprapubic ports were then closed. The fascias were then closed with #0-Vicryl suture on a UR6 needle. Once the fascias were closed, all incisions were closed with #4-0 undyed Vicryl. The areas were cleaned, Steri-Strips were placed across the wound. Sterile dressing was applied.,The patient tolerated the procedure well. She was extubated following the procedure, returned to Postanesthesia Care Unit in stable condition. She will be admitted to General Medical Floor and she will be followed closely in the early postoperative course. ### Response: Gastroenterology, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right pectoralis major tendon rupture.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right pectoralis major tendon rupture.,OPERATION PERFORMED: , Open repair of right pectoralis major tendon.,ANESTHESIA:, General with an interscalene block.,COMPLICATIONS:, None.,Needle and sponge counts were done and correct.,INDICATION FOR OPERATION: ,The patient is a 26-year-old right hand dominant male who works in sales, who was performing heavy bench press exercises when he felt a tearing burning pain severe in his right shoulder. The patient presented with mild bruising over the proximal arm of the right side with x-ray showing no fracture. Over concerns for pectoralis tendon tear, he was sent for MRI evaluation where a complete rupture of a portion of the pectoralis major tendon was noted. Due to the patient's young age and active lifestyle surgical treatment was recommended in order to obtain best result. The risks and benefits of the procedure were discussed in detail with the patient including, but not limited to scarring, infection, damage to blood vessels and nerves, re-rupture, need further surgery, loss of range of motion, inability to return to heavy activity such as weight lifting, complex usual pain syndrome, and deep vein thrombosis as well as anesthetic risks. Understanding all risks and benefits, the patient desires to proceed with surgery as planned.,FINDINGS:,1. Following deltopectoral approach to the right shoulder, the pectoralis major tendon was encountered. The clavicular head was noted to be intact. There was noted to be complete rupture of the sternal head of the pectoralis major tendon with an oblique-type tear having some remaining cuff on the humerus and some tendon attached to the retracted portion.,2. Following freeing of adhesions using tracks and sutures, the pectoralis major tendon was able to reapproximated to its insertion site on the humerus just lateral to the biceps.,3. A soft tissue repair was performed with #5 FiberWire suture and a single suture anchor of 5 x 5 bioabsorbable anchor was placed in order to decrease tension at the repair site. Following repair of soft tissue and using the bone anchor, there was noted to be good apposition of the tendon with edges and a solid repair.,OPERATIVE REPORT IN DETAIL: , The patient was identified in the preop holding area. His right shoulder was identified, marked his appropriate surgical site after verification with the patient. He was then taken to the operating room where he was transferred to the operative table in supine position and placed under general anesthesia by anesthesiology team. He then received prophylactic antibiotics. A time-out was then undertaken verifying the correct patient, extremity, surgery performed, administration of antibiotics, and the availability of equipment. At this point, the patient was placed to a modified beech chair position with care taken to ensure all appropriate pressure points were padded and there was no pressure over the eyes. The right upper extremity was then prepped and draped in the usual sterile fashion. Preoperative markings were still visible at this point. A deltopectoral incision was made utilizing the inferior portion. Dissection was carried down. The deltoid was retracted laterally. The clavicular head of the pectoralis major was noted to be intact with the absence of the sternal insertion. There was a small cuff of tissue left on the proximal humerus associated with the clavicular head. Gentle probing medially revealed the end of the sternal retracted portion, traction sutures of #5 Ethibond were used in this to allow for retraction and freeing from light adhesion. This allowed reapproximation of the retracted tendon to the tendon stump. At this point, a repair using #5 FiberWire was then performed of the pectoralis major tendon back to stump on the proximal humerus noting good apposition of the tendon edges and no gapping of the repair site. At this point, a single metal suture anchor was attempted to be implanted just lateral to the insertion of the pectoralis in order to remove tension off the repair site; however, the inserted device attached to the metal anchor broke during insertion due to significant hardness of the bone. For this reason, the starting hole was tapped and a 5x5 bioabsorbable anchor was placed, doubly loaded. The sutures were then weaved through the lateral aspect of the torn tendon and a modified Krackow type performed and sutured thereby relieving tension off the soft tissue repair. At this point, there was noted to be excellent apposition of the soft tissue ends and a solid repair to gentle manipulation. Aggressive external rotation was not performed. The wound was then copiously irrigated. The cephalic vein was not injured during the case. The skin was then closed using a 2-0 Vicryl followed by a 3-0 subcuticular Prolene suture with Steri-Strips. Sterile dressing was then placed. Anesthesia was then performed, interscalene block. The patient was then awakened from anesthesia and transported to postanesthesia care in stable condition in a shoulder immobilizer with the arm adducted and internally rotated.,Plan for this patient, the patient will remain in the shoulder immobilizer until followup visit in approximately 10 days. We will then start a gentle Codman type exercises and having limited motion until the 4-6 week point based on the patient's progression.

preoperative diagnosis right pectoralis major tendon rupturepostoperative diagnosis right pectoralis major tendon ruptureoperation performed open repair right pectoralis major tendonanesthesia general interscalene blockcomplications noneneedle sponge counts done correctindication operation patient yearold right hand dominant male works sales performing heavy bench press exercises felt tearing burning pain severe right shoulder patient presented mild bruising proximal arm right side xray showing fracture concerns pectoralis tendon tear sent mri evaluation complete rupture portion pectoralis major tendon noted due patients young age active lifestyle surgical treatment recommended order obtain best result risks benefits procedure discussed detail patient including limited scarring infection damage blood vessels nerves rerupture need surgery loss range motion inability return heavy activity weight lifting complex usual pain syndrome deep vein thrombosis well anesthetic risks understanding risks benefits patient desires proceed surgery plannedfindings following deltopectoral approach right shoulder pectoralis major tendon encountered clavicular head noted intact noted complete rupture sternal head pectoralis major tendon obliquetype tear remaining cuff humerus tendon attached retracted portion following freeing adhesions using tracks sutures pectoralis major tendon able reapproximated insertion site humerus lateral biceps soft tissue repair performed fiberwire suture single suture anchor x bioabsorbable anchor placed order decrease tension repair site following repair soft tissue using bone anchor noted good apposition tendon edges solid repairoperative report detail patient identified preop holding area right shoulder identified marked appropriate surgical site verification patient taken operating room transferred operative table supine position placed general anesthesia anesthesiology team received prophylactic antibiotics timeout undertaken verifying correct patient extremity surgery performed administration antibiotics availability equipment point patient placed modified beech chair position care taken ensure appropriate pressure points padded pressure eyes right upper extremity prepped draped usual sterile fashion preoperative markings still visible point deltopectoral incision made utilizing inferior portion dissection carried deltoid retracted laterally clavicular head pectoralis major noted intact absence sternal insertion small cuff tissue left proximal humerus associated clavicular head gentle probing medially revealed end sternal retracted portion traction sutures ethibond used allow retraction freeing light adhesion allowed reapproximation retracted tendon tendon stump point repair using fiberwire performed pectoralis major tendon back stump proximal humerus noting good apposition tendon edges gapping repair site point single metal suture anchor attempted implanted lateral insertion pectoralis order remove tension repair site however inserted device attached metal anchor broke insertion due significant hardness bone reason starting hole tapped x bioabsorbable anchor placed doubly loaded sutures weaved lateral aspect torn tendon modified krackow type performed sutured thereby relieving tension soft tissue repair point noted excellent apposition soft tissue ends solid repair gentle manipulation aggressive external rotation performed wound copiously irrigated cephalic vein injured case skin closed using vicryl followed subcuticular prolene suture steristrips sterile dressing placed anesthesia performed interscalene block patient awakened anesthesia transported postanesthesia care stable condition shoulder immobilizer arm adducted internally rotatedplan patient patient remain shoulder immobilizer followup visit approximately days start gentle codman type exercises limited motion week point based patients progression

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right pectoralis major tendon rupture.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right pectoralis major tendon rupture.,OPERATION PERFORMED: , Open repair of right pectoralis major tendon.,ANESTHESIA:, General with an interscalene block.,COMPLICATIONS:, None.,Needle and sponge counts were done and correct.,INDICATION FOR OPERATION: ,The patient is a 26-year-old right hand dominant male who works in sales, who was performing heavy bench press exercises when he felt a tearing burning pain severe in his right shoulder. The patient presented with mild bruising over the proximal arm of the right side with x-ray showing no fracture. Over concerns for pectoralis tendon tear, he was sent for MRI evaluation where a complete rupture of a portion of the pectoralis major tendon was noted. Due to the patient's young age and active lifestyle surgical treatment was recommended in order to obtain best result. The risks and benefits of the procedure were discussed in detail with the patient including, but not limited to scarring, infection, damage to blood vessels and nerves, re-rupture, need further surgery, loss of range of motion, inability to return to heavy activity such as weight lifting, complex usual pain syndrome, and deep vein thrombosis as well as anesthetic risks. Understanding all risks and benefits, the patient desires to proceed with surgery as planned.,FINDINGS:,1. Following deltopectoral approach to the right shoulder, the pectoralis major tendon was encountered. The clavicular head was noted to be intact. There was noted to be complete rupture of the sternal head of the pectoralis major tendon with an oblique-type tear having some remaining cuff on the humerus and some tendon attached to the retracted portion.,2. Following freeing of adhesions using tracks and sutures, the pectoralis major tendon was able to reapproximated to its insertion site on the humerus just lateral to the biceps.,3. A soft tissue repair was performed with #5 FiberWire suture and a single suture anchor of 5 x 5 bioabsorbable anchor was placed in order to decrease tension at the repair site. Following repair of soft tissue and using the bone anchor, there was noted to be good apposition of the tendon with edges and a solid repair.,OPERATIVE REPORT IN DETAIL: , The patient was identified in the preop holding area. His right shoulder was identified, marked his appropriate surgical site after verification with the patient. He was then taken to the operating room where he was transferred to the operative table in supine position and placed under general anesthesia by anesthesiology team. He then received prophylactic antibiotics. A time-out was then undertaken verifying the correct patient, extremity, surgery performed, administration of antibiotics, and the availability of equipment. At this point, the patient was placed to a modified beech chair position with care taken to ensure all appropriate pressure points were padded and there was no pressure over the eyes. The right upper extremity was then prepped and draped in the usual sterile fashion. Preoperative markings were still visible at this point. A deltopectoral incision was made utilizing the inferior portion. Dissection was carried down. The deltoid was retracted laterally. The clavicular head of the pectoralis major was noted to be intact with the absence of the sternal insertion. There was a small cuff of tissue left on the proximal humerus associated with the clavicular head. Gentle probing medially revealed the end of the sternal retracted portion, traction sutures of #5 Ethibond were used in this to allow for retraction and freeing from light adhesion. This allowed reapproximation of the retracted tendon to the tendon stump. At this point, a repair using #5 FiberWire was then performed of the pectoralis major tendon back to stump on the proximal humerus noting good apposition of the tendon edges and no gapping of the repair site. At this point, a single metal suture anchor was attempted to be implanted just lateral to the insertion of the pectoralis in order to remove tension off the repair site; however, the inserted device attached to the metal anchor broke during insertion due to significant hardness of the bone. For this reason, the starting hole was tapped and a 5x5 bioabsorbable anchor was placed, doubly loaded. The sutures were then weaved through the lateral aspect of the torn tendon and a modified Krackow type performed and sutured thereby relieving tension off the soft tissue repair. At this point, there was noted to be excellent apposition of the soft tissue ends and a solid repair to gentle manipulation. Aggressive external rotation was not performed. The wound was then copiously irrigated. The cephalic vein was not injured during the case. The skin was then closed using a 2-0 Vicryl followed by a 3-0 subcuticular Prolene suture with Steri-Strips. Sterile dressing was then placed. Anesthesia was then performed, interscalene block. The patient was then awakened from anesthesia and transported to postanesthesia care in stable condition in a shoulder immobilizer with the arm adducted and internally rotated.,Plan for this patient, the patient will remain in the shoulder immobilizer until followup visit in approximately 10 days. We will then start a gentle Codman type exercises and having limited motion until the 4-6 week point based on the patient's progression. ### Response: Orthopedic, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right pleural effusion and suspected malignant mesothelioma.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Right pleural effusion, suspected malignant mesothelioma.,PROCEDURE: , Right VATS pleurodesis and pleural biopsy.,ANESTHESIA:, General double-lumen endotracheal.,DESCRIPTION OF FINDINGS: , Right pleural effusion, firm nodules, diffuse scattered throughout the right pleura and diaphragmatic surface.,SPECIMEN: , Pleural biopsies for pathology and microbiology.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS: , Minimal.,FLUIDS: , Crystalloid 1.2 L and 1.9 L of pleural effusion drained.,INDICATIONS: , Briefly, this is a 66-year-old gentleman who has been transferred from an outside hospital after a pleural effusion had been drained and biopsies taken from the right chest that were thought to be consistent with mesothelioma. Upon transfer, he had a right pleural effusion demonstrated on x-ray as well as some shortness of breath and dyspnea on exertion. The risks, benefits, and alternatives to right VATS pleurodesis and pleural biopsy were discussed with the patient and his family and they wished to proceed.,PROCEDURE IN DETAIL: ,After informed consent was obtained, the patient was brought to the operating room and placed in supine position. A double-lumen endotracheal tube was placed. SCDs were also placed and he was given preoperative Kefzol. The patient was then brought into the right side up, left decubitus position, and the area was prepped and draped in the usual fashion. A needle was inserted in the axillary line to determine position of the effusion. At this time, a 10-mm port was placed using the knife and Bovie cautery. The effusion was drained by placing a sucker into this port site. Upon feeling the surface of the pleura, there were multiple firm nodules. An additional anterior port was then placed in similar fashion. The effusion was then drained with a sucker. Multiple pleural biopsies were taken with the biopsy device in all areas of the pleura. Of note, feeling the diaphragmatic surface, it appeared that it was quite nodular, but these nodules felt as though they were on the other side of the diaphragm and not on the pleural surface of the diaphragm concerning for a possibly metastatic disease. This will be worked up with further imaging study later in his hospitalization. After the effusion had been drained, 2 cans of talc pleurodesis aerosol were used to cover the lung and pleural surface with talc. The lungs were then inflated and noted to inflate well. A 32 curved chest tube chest tube was placed and secured with nylon. The other port site was closed at the level of the fascia with 2-0 Vicryl and then 4-0 Monocryl for the skin. The patient was then brought in the supine position and extubated and brought to recovery room in stable condition.,Dr. X was present for the entire procedure which was right VATS pleurodesis and pleural biopsies.,The counts were correct x2 at the end of the case.

preoperative diagnosis right pleural effusion suspected malignant mesotheliomapostoperative diagnosis right pleural effusion suspected malignant mesotheliomaprocedure right vats pleurodesis pleural biopsyanesthesia general doublelumen endotrachealdescription findings right pleural effusion firm nodules diffuse scattered throughout right pleura diaphragmatic surfacespecimen pleural biopsies pathology microbiologyestimated blood loss minimalfluids crystalloid l l pleural effusion drainedindications briefly yearold gentleman transferred outside hospital pleural effusion drained biopsies taken right chest thought consistent mesothelioma upon transfer right pleural effusion demonstrated xray well shortness breath dyspnea exertion risks benefits alternatives right vats pleurodesis pleural biopsy discussed patient family wished proceedprocedure detail informed consent obtained patient brought operating room placed supine position doublelumen endotracheal tube placed scds also placed given preoperative kefzol patient brought right side left decubitus position area prepped draped usual fashion needle inserted axillary line determine position effusion time mm port placed using knife bovie cautery effusion drained placing sucker port site upon feeling surface pleura multiple firm nodules additional anterior port placed similar fashion effusion drained sucker multiple pleural biopsies taken biopsy device areas pleura note feeling diaphragmatic surface appeared quite nodular nodules felt though side diaphragm pleural surface diaphragm concerning possibly metastatic disease worked imaging study later hospitalization effusion drained cans talc pleurodesis aerosol used cover lung pleural surface talc lungs inflated noted inflate well curved chest tube chest tube placed secured nylon port site closed level fascia vicryl monocryl skin patient brought supine position extubated brought recovery room stable conditiondr x present entire procedure right vats pleurodesis pleural biopsiesthe counts correct x end case

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right pleural effusion and suspected malignant mesothelioma.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Right pleural effusion, suspected malignant mesothelioma.,PROCEDURE: , Right VATS pleurodesis and pleural biopsy.,ANESTHESIA:, General double-lumen endotracheal.,DESCRIPTION OF FINDINGS: , Right pleural effusion, firm nodules, diffuse scattered throughout the right pleura and diaphragmatic surface.,SPECIMEN: , Pleural biopsies for pathology and microbiology.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS: , Minimal.,FLUIDS: , Crystalloid 1.2 L and 1.9 L of pleural effusion drained.,INDICATIONS: , Briefly, this is a 66-year-old gentleman who has been transferred from an outside hospital after a pleural effusion had been drained and biopsies taken from the right chest that were thought to be consistent with mesothelioma. Upon transfer, he had a right pleural effusion demonstrated on x-ray as well as some shortness of breath and dyspnea on exertion. The risks, benefits, and alternatives to right VATS pleurodesis and pleural biopsy were discussed with the patient and his family and they wished to proceed.,PROCEDURE IN DETAIL: ,After informed consent was obtained, the patient was brought to the operating room and placed in supine position. A double-lumen endotracheal tube was placed. SCDs were also placed and he was given preoperative Kefzol. The patient was then brought into the right side up, left decubitus position, and the area was prepped and draped in the usual fashion. A needle was inserted in the axillary line to determine position of the effusion. At this time, a 10-mm port was placed using the knife and Bovie cautery. The effusion was drained by placing a sucker into this port site. Upon feeling the surface of the pleura, there were multiple firm nodules. An additional anterior port was then placed in similar fashion. The effusion was then drained with a sucker. Multiple pleural biopsies were taken with the biopsy device in all areas of the pleura. Of note, feeling the diaphragmatic surface, it appeared that it was quite nodular, but these nodules felt as though they were on the other side of the diaphragm and not on the pleural surface of the diaphragm concerning for a possibly metastatic disease. This will be worked up with further imaging study later in his hospitalization. After the effusion had been drained, 2 cans of talc pleurodesis aerosol were used to cover the lung and pleural surface with talc. The lungs were then inflated and noted to inflate well. A 32 curved chest tube chest tube was placed and secured with nylon. The other port site was closed at the level of the fascia with 2-0 Vicryl and then 4-0 Monocryl for the skin. The patient was then brought in the supine position and extubated and brought to recovery room in stable condition.,Dr. X was present for the entire procedure which was right VATS pleurodesis and pleural biopsies.,The counts were correct x2 at the end of the case. ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary, Hematology - Oncology, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right pleural effusion with respiratory failure and dyspnea.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right pleural effusion with respiratory failure and dyspnea.,PROCEDURE: , Ultrasound-guided right pleurocentesis.,ANESTHESIA: , Local with lidocaine.,TECHNIQUE IN DETAIL: , After informed consent was obtained from the patient and his mother, the chest was scanned with portable ultrasound. Findings revealed a normal right hemidiaphragm, a moderate right pleural effusion without septation or debris, and no gliding sign of the lung on the right. Using sterile technique and with ultrasound as a guide, a pleural catheter was inserted and serosanguinous fluid was withdrawn, a total of 1 L. The patient tolerated the procedure well. Portable x-ray is pending.

preoperative diagnosis right pleural effusion respiratory failure dyspneapostoperative diagnosis right pleural effusion respiratory failure dyspneaprocedure ultrasoundguided right pleurocentesisanesthesia local lidocainetechnique detail informed consent obtained patient mother chest scanned portable ultrasound findings revealed normal right hemidiaphragm moderate right pleural effusion without septation debris gliding sign lung right using sterile technique ultrasound guide pleural catheter inserted serosanguinous fluid withdrawn total l patient tolerated procedure well portable xray pending

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right pleural effusion with respiratory failure and dyspnea.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right pleural effusion with respiratory failure and dyspnea.,PROCEDURE: , Ultrasound-guided right pleurocentesis.,ANESTHESIA: , Local with lidocaine.,TECHNIQUE IN DETAIL: , After informed consent was obtained from the patient and his mother, the chest was scanned with portable ultrasound. Findings revealed a normal right hemidiaphragm, a moderate right pleural effusion without septation or debris, and no gliding sign of the lung on the right. Using sterile technique and with ultrasound as a guide, a pleural catheter was inserted and serosanguinous fluid was withdrawn, a total of 1 L. The patient tolerated the procedure well. Portable x-ray is pending. ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right pleural mass.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Mesothelioma.,PROCEDURES PERFORMED:,1. Flexible bronchoscopy.,2. Mediastinoscopy.,3. Right thoracotomy.,4. Parietal pleural biopsy.,CONSULTS:,Consults obtained during this hospitalization included:,1. Radiation Oncology.,2. Pulmonary Medicine.,3. Medical Oncology.,4. Cancer Center Team consult.,5. Massage therapy consult.,HOSPITAL COURSE:, The patient's hospital course was unremarkable. Her pain was well controlled with an epidural that was placed by Anesthesia. At the time of discharge, the patient was ambulatory. She was discharged with home oxygen available. She was discharged with albuterol nebulizer treatments, treatments were to be q.i.d. She was discharged with a prescription for Vicodin for pain control. She is to follow up with Dr. X in the office in one week with a chest x-ray. She is instructed not to lift, push or pull anything greater than 10 pounds. She is instructed not to drive until after she sees us in the office and is off her pain medications.

preoperative diagnosis right pleural masspostoperative diagnosis mesotheliomaprocedures performed flexible bronchoscopy mediastinoscopy right thoracotomy parietal pleural biopsyconsultsconsults obtained hospitalization included radiation oncology pulmonary medicine medical oncology cancer center team consult massage therapy consulthospital course patients hospital course unremarkable pain well controlled epidural placed anesthesia time discharge patient ambulatory discharged home oxygen available discharged albuterol nebulizer treatments treatments qid discharged prescription vicodin pain control follow dr x office one week chest xray instructed lift push pull anything greater pounds instructed drive sees us office pain medications

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right pleural mass.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Mesothelioma.,PROCEDURES PERFORMED:,1. Flexible bronchoscopy.,2. Mediastinoscopy.,3. Right thoracotomy.,4. Parietal pleural biopsy.,CONSULTS:,Consults obtained during this hospitalization included:,1. Radiation Oncology.,2. Pulmonary Medicine.,3. Medical Oncology.,4. Cancer Center Team consult.,5. Massage therapy consult.,HOSPITAL COURSE:, The patient's hospital course was unremarkable. Her pain was well controlled with an epidural that was placed by Anesthesia. At the time of discharge, the patient was ambulatory. She was discharged with home oxygen available. She was discharged with albuterol nebulizer treatments, treatments were to be q.i.d. She was discharged with a prescription for Vicodin for pain control. She is to follow up with Dr. X in the office in one week with a chest x-ray. She is instructed not to lift, push or pull anything greater than 10 pounds. She is instructed not to drive until after she sees us in the office and is off her pain medications. ### Response: Discharge Summary, Hematology - Oncology

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right profound mixed sensorineural conductive hearing loss.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Right profound mixed sensorineural conductive hearing loss.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED:, Right middle ear exploration with a Goldenberg TORP reconstruction.,ANESTHESIA:, General ,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS:, Less than 5 cc.,COMPLICATIONS:, None.,DESCRIPTION OF FINDINGS:, The patient consented to revision surgery because of the profound hearing loss in her right ear. It was unclear from her previous operative records and CT scan as to whether or not she was a reconstruction candidate. She had reports of stapes fixation as well as otosclerosis on her CT scan.,At surgery, she was found to have a mobile malleus handle, but her stapes was fixed by otosclerosis. There was no incus. There was no specific round window niche. There was a very minute crevice; however, exploration of this area did not reveal a niche to a round window membrane. The patient had a type of TORP prosthesis, which had tilted off the footplate anteriorly underneath the malleus handle.,DESCRIPTION OF THE PROCEDURE:, The patient was brought to the operative room and placed in supine position. The right face, ear, and neck prepped with ***** alcohol solution. The right ear was draped in the sterile field. External auditory canal was injected with 1% Xylocaine with 1:50,000 epinephrine. A Fisch indwelling incision was made and a tympanomeatal flap was developed in a 12 o'clock to the 7 o'clock position. Meatal skin was elevated, middle ear was entered. This exposure included the oval window, round window areas. There was a good cartilage graft in place and incorporated into the posterior superior ***** of the drum. The previous prosthesis was found out of position as it had tilted out of position anteriorly, and there was no contact with the footplate. The prosthesis was removed without difficulty. The patient's stapes had an arch, but the ***** was atrophied. Malleus handle was mobile. The footplate was fixed. Consideration have been given to performing a stapedectomy with a tissue seal and then returning later for prosthesis insertion; however, upon inspection of the round window area, there was found to be no definable round window niche, no round window membrane. The patient was felt to have obliterated otosclerosis of this area along with the stapes fixation. She is not considered to be a reconstruction candidate under the current circumstances. No attempt was made to remove bone from the round window area. A different style of Goldenberg TORP was placed on the footplate underneath the cartilage support in hopes of transferring some sound conduction from the tympanic membrane to the footplate. The fit was secure and supported with Gelfoam in the middle ear. The tympanomeatal flap was returned to anatomic position supported with Gelfoam saturated Ciprodex. The incision was closed with #4-0 Vicryl and individual #5-0 nylon to the skin, and a sterile dressing was applied.

preoperative diagnosis right profound mixed sensorineural conductive hearing losspostoperative diagnosis right profound mixed sensorineural conductive hearing lossprocedure performed right middle ear exploration goldenberg torp reconstructionanesthesia general estimated blood loss less cccomplications nonedescription findings patient consented revision surgery profound hearing loss right ear unclear previous operative records ct scan whether reconstruction candidate reports stapes fixation well otosclerosis ct scanat surgery found mobile malleus handle stapes fixed otosclerosis incus specific round window niche minute crevice however exploration area reveal niche round window membrane patient type torp prosthesis tilted footplate anteriorly underneath malleus handledescription procedure patient brought operative room placed supine position right face ear neck prepped alcohol solution right ear draped sterile field external auditory canal injected xylocaine epinephrine fisch indwelling incision made tympanomeatal flap developed oclock oclock position meatal skin elevated middle ear entered exposure included oval window round window areas good cartilage graft place incorporated posterior superior drum previous prosthesis found position tilted position anteriorly contact footplate prosthesis removed without difficulty patients stapes arch atrophied malleus handle mobile footplate fixed consideration given performing stapedectomy tissue seal returning later prosthesis insertion however upon inspection round window area found definable round window niche round window membrane patient felt obliterated otosclerosis area along stapes fixation considered reconstruction candidate current circumstances attempt made remove bone round window area different style goldenberg torp placed footplate underneath cartilage support hopes transferring sound conduction tympanic membrane footplate fit secure supported gelfoam middle ear tympanomeatal flap returned anatomic position supported gelfoam saturated ciprodex incision closed vicryl individual nylon skin sterile dressing applied

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right profound mixed sensorineural conductive hearing loss.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Right profound mixed sensorineural conductive hearing loss.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED:, Right middle ear exploration with a Goldenberg TORP reconstruction.,ANESTHESIA:, General ,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS:, Less than 5 cc.,COMPLICATIONS:, None.,DESCRIPTION OF FINDINGS:, The patient consented to revision surgery because of the profound hearing loss in her right ear. It was unclear from her previous operative records and CT scan as to whether or not she was a reconstruction candidate. She had reports of stapes fixation as well as otosclerosis on her CT scan.,At surgery, she was found to have a mobile malleus handle, but her stapes was fixed by otosclerosis. There was no incus. There was no specific round window niche. There was a very minute crevice; however, exploration of this area did not reveal a niche to a round window membrane. The patient had a type of TORP prosthesis, which had tilted off the footplate anteriorly underneath the malleus handle.,DESCRIPTION OF THE PROCEDURE:, The patient was brought to the operative room and placed in supine position. The right face, ear, and neck prepped with ***** alcohol solution. The right ear was draped in the sterile field. External auditory canal was injected with 1% Xylocaine with 1:50,000 epinephrine. A Fisch indwelling incision was made and a tympanomeatal flap was developed in a 12 o'clock to the 7 o'clock position. Meatal skin was elevated, middle ear was entered. This exposure included the oval window, round window areas. There was a good cartilage graft in place and incorporated into the posterior superior ***** of the drum. The previous prosthesis was found out of position as it had tilted out of position anteriorly, and there was no contact with the footplate. The prosthesis was removed without difficulty. The patient's stapes had an arch, but the ***** was atrophied. Malleus handle was mobile. The footplate was fixed. Consideration have been given to performing a stapedectomy with a tissue seal and then returning later for prosthesis insertion; however, upon inspection of the round window area, there was found to be no definable round window niche, no round window membrane. The patient was felt to have obliterated otosclerosis of this area along with the stapes fixation. She is not considered to be a reconstruction candidate under the current circumstances. No attempt was made to remove bone from the round window area. A different style of Goldenberg TORP was placed on the footplate underneath the cartilage support in hopes of transferring some sound conduction from the tympanic membrane to the footplate. The fit was secure and supported with Gelfoam in the middle ear. The tympanomeatal flap was returned to anatomic position supported with Gelfoam saturated Ciprodex. The incision was closed with #4-0 Vicryl and individual #5-0 nylon to the skin, and a sterile dressing was applied. ### Response: ENT - Otolaryngology, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right renal mass.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right renal mass.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED: , Laparoscopic right partial nephrectomy.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS:, 250 mL.,X-RAYS: , None.,SPECIMENS: , Included right renal mass as well as biopsies from the base of the resection.,ANESTHESIA:, General endotracheal.,COMPLICATIONS: , None.,DRAINS: , Included a JP drain in the right flank as well as a #16-French Foley catheter per urethra.,BRIEF HISTORY: , The patient is a 60-year-old gentleman with a history of an enhancing right renal mass approximately 2 cm in diameter. I had a long discussion with him concerning variety of options. We talked in particular about extirpated versus ablative surgery. Based on his young age and excellent state of health, decision was made at this point to proceed to a right partial nephrectomy laparoscopically. All questions were answered, and he wished to proceed with surgery as planned. Note that the patient does have a positive family history of renal cell carcinoma.,PROCEDURE IN DETAIL: , After acquisition of proper informed consent and administration of perioperative antibiotics, the patient was taken to the operating room and placed supine on the operating table. After institution of adequate general anesthetic via endotracheal rod, he was placed into the right anterior flank position with his right side elevated on a roll and his right arm across his chest. All pressure points were carefully padded, and he was securely taped to the table. Note that sequential compression devices were in place on both lower extremities and were activated prior to induction of anesthesia. His abdomen was then prepped and draped in a standard surgical fashion. Note that a #16-French Foley catheter was in place per urethra as well as an orogastric tube. The abdomen was insufflated at the right lateral abdomen using the Veress needle to a pressure of 15 without incident. We then placed a Visiport 10 x 12 trocar in the right lateral abdomen. With the trocar in place, we were able to place the remaining trocars under direct laparoscopic visualization. We placed three additional trocars. An 11 mm screw type trocar at the umbilicus, a 6 screw type trocar 7 cm in the midline above the umbilicus, and a 10 x 12 trocar to serve as a retractor port approximately 8 cm inferior in the midline.,The procedure was begun by reflecting the right colon by incising the white line of Toldt. The colon was reflected medially, and the retroperitoneum was exposed on that side. This was a fairly superficial lesion, so decision was made in advance to potentially not perform vascular clamping, however, I did feel it important to get high level control prior to proceeding to the partial. With the colon reflected, the duodenum was identified, and it was reflected medially under Kocher maneuver. The ureter and gonadal vein were identified on the right side and elevated. The space between the ureter and the gonadal vein was then developed, and the gonadal vein was dropped elevating only the ureter, and carrying this plane dissection up towards the renal hilum. Once we got up to the renal hilum, we were able to skeletonize the renal hilar vessels partially, and in particular, we did develop some of the upper pole dissection above the level of the hilum to provide for access for a Satinsky clamp or bulldogs. The remainder of the kidney was then freed off its lateral and superior attachments primarily using the Harmonic scalpel and the LigaSure device.,With the kidney free and the hilum prepared, the Gerota fascia was taken down overlying the kidney exposing the renal parenchyma, and using this approach, we were able to identify the 2-cm, right renal mass located in the lower pole laterally. A cap of fat was left overlying this mass. Based on the position of the mass, we performed intraoperative laparoscopic ultrasound, which showed the mass to be somewhat deeper than initially anticipated. Based on this finding, I decided to go ahead and clamp the renal hilum during resection. A Satinsky clamp was introduced through the lower most trocar site and used to clamp the renal hilum en bloc. Note that the patient had been receiving renal protection protocol including fenoldopam and mannitol throughout the procedure, and he also received Lasix prior to clamping the renal hilum. With the renal hilum clamped, we did resect the tumor using cold scissors. There was somewhat more bleeding than would be expected based on the hilar clamping; however, we were able to successfully resect this lesion. We also took a biopsy at the base of the resection and passed off the table as a specimen for frozen section. With the tumor resected, the base of the resection was then cauterized using the Argon beam coagulator, and several bleeding vessels were oversewn using figure-of-eight 3-0 Vicryl sutures with lap ties for tensioning. We then placed a FloSeal into the wound and covered it with a Surgicel and held the pressure. We then released the vascular clamp. Total clamp time was 11 minutes. There was minimal bleeding and occlusion of this maneuver, and after unclamping the kidney, the kidney pinked up appropriately and appeared well perfused after removal of the clamp. We then replaced the kidney within its Gerota envelope and closed that with 3-0 Vicryl using lap ties for tensioning. A JP drain was introduced through the right flank and placed adjacent to the kidney and sutured the skin with 2-0 nylon. The specimen was placed into a 10-mm Endocatch bag and extracted from the lower most trocar site after extending it approximately 1 cm. It was evaluated on the table and passed off the table for Pathology to evaluate. They stated that the tumor was close to the margin, but there appeared to be 1-2 mm normal parenchyma around the tumor. In addition, the frozen section biopsies from the base of the resection were negative for renal cell carcinoma. Based on these findings, the lower most trocar site was closed using a running 0 Vicryl suture in the fascia. We then re-insufflated the abdomen and carefully evaluated the entire intraoperative field for hemostasis. Any bleeding points were controlled primarily using bipolar cautery or hemoclips. The area was copiously irrigated with normal saline. The colon was then replaced into its normal anatomic position. The mesentry was evaluated. There were no defects noted. We closed the 10 x 12 lateral most trocar site using a Carter-Thompson closure device with 0-Vicryl. All trocars were removed under direct visualization, and the abdomen was desufflated prior to removal of the last trocar. The skin incisions were irrigated with normal saline and infiltrated with 0.25% Marcaine, and the skin was closed using a running 4-0 Monocryl in subcuticular fashion. Benzoin and Steri-Strips were placed. The patient was returned in supine position and awoken from general anesthetic without incident. He was then transferred to hospital gurney and taken to the postanesthesia care unit for postoperative monitoring. At the end of the case, sponge, instrument, and needle counts were correct. I was scrubbed and present throughout the entire case.

preoperative diagnosis right renal masspostoperative diagnosis right renal massprocedure performed laparoscopic right partial nephrectomyestimated blood loss mlxrays nonespecimens included right renal mass well biopsies base resectionanesthesia general endotrachealcomplications nonedrains included jp drain right flank well french foley catheter per urethrabrief history patient yearold gentleman history enhancing right renal mass approximately cm diameter long discussion concerning variety options talked particular extirpated versus ablative surgery based young age excellent state health decision made point proceed right partial nephrectomy laparoscopically questions answered wished proceed surgery planned note patient positive family history renal cell carcinomaprocedure detail acquisition proper informed consent administration perioperative antibiotics patient taken operating room placed supine operating table institution adequate general anesthetic via endotracheal rod placed right anterior flank position right side elevated roll right arm across chest pressure points carefully padded securely taped table note sequential compression devices place lower extremities activated prior induction anesthesia abdomen prepped draped standard surgical fashion note french foley catheter place per urethra well orogastric tube abdomen insufflated right lateral abdomen using veress needle pressure without incident placed visiport x trocar right lateral abdomen trocar place able place remaining trocars direct laparoscopic visualization placed three additional trocars mm screw type trocar umbilicus screw type trocar cm midline umbilicus x trocar serve retractor port approximately cm inferior midlinethe procedure begun reflecting right colon incising white line toldt colon reflected medially retroperitoneum exposed side fairly superficial lesion decision made advance potentially perform vascular clamping however feel important get high level control prior proceeding partial colon reflected duodenum identified reflected medially kocher maneuver ureter gonadal vein identified right side elevated space ureter gonadal vein developed gonadal vein dropped elevating ureter carrying plane dissection towards renal hilum got renal hilum able skeletonize renal hilar vessels partially particular develop upper pole dissection level hilum provide access satinsky clamp bulldogs remainder kidney freed lateral superior attachments primarily using harmonic scalpel ligasure devicewith kidney free hilum prepared gerota fascia taken overlying kidney exposing renal parenchyma using approach able identify cm right renal mass located lower pole laterally cap fat left overlying mass based position mass performed intraoperative laparoscopic ultrasound showed mass somewhat deeper initially anticipated based finding decided go ahead clamp renal hilum resection satinsky clamp introduced lower trocar site used clamp renal hilum en bloc note patient receiving renal protection protocol including fenoldopam mannitol throughout procedure also received lasix prior clamping renal hilum renal hilum clamped resect tumor using cold scissors somewhat bleeding would expected based hilar clamping however able successfully resect lesion also took biopsy base resection passed table specimen frozen section tumor resected base resection cauterized using argon beam coagulator several bleeding vessels oversewn using figureofeight vicryl sutures lap ties tensioning placed floseal wound covered surgicel held pressure released vascular clamp total clamp time minutes minimal bleeding occlusion maneuver unclamping kidney kidney pinked appropriately appeared well perfused removal clamp replaced kidney within gerota envelope closed vicryl using lap ties tensioning jp drain introduced right flank placed adjacent kidney sutured skin nylon specimen placed mm endocatch bag extracted lower trocar site extending approximately cm evaluated table passed table pathology evaluate stated tumor close margin appeared mm normal parenchyma around tumor addition frozen section biopsies base resection negative renal cell carcinoma based findings lower trocar site closed using running vicryl suture fascia reinsufflated abdomen carefully evaluated entire intraoperative field hemostasis bleeding points controlled primarily using bipolar cautery hemoclips area copiously irrigated normal saline colon replaced normal anatomic position mesentry evaluated defects noted closed x lateral trocar site using carterthompson closure device vicryl trocars removed direct visualization abdomen desufflated prior removal last trocar skin incisions irrigated normal saline infiltrated marcaine skin closed using running monocryl subcuticular fashion benzoin steristrips placed patient returned supine position awoken general anesthetic without incident transferred hospital gurney taken postanesthesia care unit postoperative monitoring end case sponge instrument needle counts correct scrubbed present throughout entire case

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right renal mass.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right renal mass.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED: , Laparoscopic right partial nephrectomy.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS:, 250 mL.,X-RAYS: , None.,SPECIMENS: , Included right renal mass as well as biopsies from the base of the resection.,ANESTHESIA:, General endotracheal.,COMPLICATIONS: , None.,DRAINS: , Included a JP drain in the right flank as well as a #16-French Foley catheter per urethra.,BRIEF HISTORY: , The patient is a 60-year-old gentleman with a history of an enhancing right renal mass approximately 2 cm in diameter. I had a long discussion with him concerning variety of options. We talked in particular about extirpated versus ablative surgery. Based on his young age and excellent state of health, decision was made at this point to proceed to a right partial nephrectomy laparoscopically. All questions were answered, and he wished to proceed with surgery as planned. Note that the patient does have a positive family history of renal cell carcinoma.,PROCEDURE IN DETAIL: , After acquisition of proper informed consent and administration of perioperative antibiotics, the patient was taken to the operating room and placed supine on the operating table. After institution of adequate general anesthetic via endotracheal rod, he was placed into the right anterior flank position with his right side elevated on a roll and his right arm across his chest. All pressure points were carefully padded, and he was securely taped to the table. Note that sequential compression devices were in place on both lower extremities and were activated prior to induction of anesthesia. His abdomen was then prepped and draped in a standard surgical fashion. Note that a #16-French Foley catheter was in place per urethra as well as an orogastric tube. The abdomen was insufflated at the right lateral abdomen using the Veress needle to a pressure of 15 without incident. We then placed a Visiport 10 x 12 trocar in the right lateral abdomen. With the trocar in place, we were able to place the remaining trocars under direct laparoscopic visualization. We placed three additional trocars. An 11 mm screw type trocar at the umbilicus, a 6 screw type trocar 7 cm in the midline above the umbilicus, and a 10 x 12 trocar to serve as a retractor port approximately 8 cm inferior in the midline.,The procedure was begun by reflecting the right colon by incising the white line of Toldt. The colon was reflected medially, and the retroperitoneum was exposed on that side. This was a fairly superficial lesion, so decision was made in advance to potentially not perform vascular clamping, however, I did feel it important to get high level control prior to proceeding to the partial. With the colon reflected, the duodenum was identified, and it was reflected medially under Kocher maneuver. The ureter and gonadal vein were identified on the right side and elevated. The space between the ureter and the gonadal vein was then developed, and the gonadal vein was dropped elevating only the ureter, and carrying this plane dissection up towards the renal hilum. Once we got up to the renal hilum, we were able to skeletonize the renal hilar vessels partially, and in particular, we did develop some of the upper pole dissection above the level of the hilum to provide for access for a Satinsky clamp or bulldogs. The remainder of the kidney was then freed off its lateral and superior attachments primarily using the Harmonic scalpel and the LigaSure device.,With the kidney free and the hilum prepared, the Gerota fascia was taken down overlying the kidney exposing the renal parenchyma, and using this approach, we were able to identify the 2-cm, right renal mass located in the lower pole laterally. A cap of fat was left overlying this mass. Based on the position of the mass, we performed intraoperative laparoscopic ultrasound, which showed the mass to be somewhat deeper than initially anticipated. Based on this finding, I decided to go ahead and clamp the renal hilum during resection. A Satinsky clamp was introduced through the lower most trocar site and used to clamp the renal hilum en bloc. Note that the patient had been receiving renal protection protocol including fenoldopam and mannitol throughout the procedure, and he also received Lasix prior to clamping the renal hilum. With the renal hilum clamped, we did resect the tumor using cold scissors. There was somewhat more bleeding than would be expected based on the hilar clamping; however, we were able to successfully resect this lesion. We also took a biopsy at the base of the resection and passed off the table as a specimen for frozen section. With the tumor resected, the base of the resection was then cauterized using the Argon beam coagulator, and several bleeding vessels were oversewn using figure-of-eight 3-0 Vicryl sutures with lap ties for tensioning. We then placed a FloSeal into the wound and covered it with a Surgicel and held the pressure. We then released the vascular clamp. Total clamp time was 11 minutes. There was minimal bleeding and occlusion of this maneuver, and after unclamping the kidney, the kidney pinked up appropriately and appeared well perfused after removal of the clamp. We then replaced the kidney within its Gerota envelope and closed that with 3-0 Vicryl using lap ties for tensioning. A JP drain was introduced through the right flank and placed adjacent to the kidney and sutured the skin with 2-0 nylon. The specimen was placed into a 10-mm Endocatch bag and extracted from the lower most trocar site after extending it approximately 1 cm. It was evaluated on the table and passed off the table for Pathology to evaluate. They stated that the tumor was close to the margin, but there appeared to be 1-2 mm normal parenchyma around the tumor. In addition, the frozen section biopsies from the base of the resection were negative for renal cell carcinoma. Based on these findings, the lower most trocar site was closed using a running 0 Vicryl suture in the fascia. We then re-insufflated the abdomen and carefully evaluated the entire intraoperative field for hemostasis. Any bleeding points were controlled primarily using bipolar cautery or hemoclips. The area was copiously irrigated with normal saline. The colon was then replaced into its normal anatomic position. The mesentry was evaluated. There were no defects noted. We closed the 10 x 12 lateral most trocar site using a Carter-Thompson closure device with 0-Vicryl. All trocars were removed under direct visualization, and the abdomen was desufflated prior to removal of the last trocar. The skin incisions were irrigated with normal saline and infiltrated with 0.25% Marcaine, and the skin was closed using a running 4-0 Monocryl in subcuticular fashion. Benzoin and Steri-Strips were placed. The patient was returned in supine position and awoken from general anesthetic without incident. He was then transferred to hospital gurney and taken to the postanesthesia care unit for postoperative monitoring. At the end of the case, sponge, instrument, and needle counts were correct. I was scrubbed and present throughout the entire case. ### Response: Nephrology, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right renal mass.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right renal mass.,PROCEDURE: , Right radical nephrectomy and assisted laparoscopic approach.,ANESTHESIA: ,General.,PROCEDURE IN DETAIL: ,The patient underwent general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. An orogastric was placed and a Foley catheter placed. He was placed in a modified flank position with the hips rotated to 45 degrees. Pillow was used to prevent any pressure points. He was widely shaved, prepped, and draped. A marking pen was used to delineate a site for the Pneumo sleeve in the right lower quadrant and for the trocar sites in the midline just above the umbilicus and halfway between the xiphoid and the umbilicus. The incision was made through the premarked site through the skin and subcutaneous tissue. The aponeurosis of the external oblique was incised in the direction of its fibers. Muscle-splitting incision was made in the internal oblique and transversus abdominis. The peritoneum was opened and the Pneumo sleeve was placed in the usual fashion being sure that no bowel was trapped inside the ring. Then, abdominal insufflation was carried out through the Pneumo sleeve and the scope was passed through the Pneumo sleeve to visualize placement of the trocars in the other two positions. Once this had been completed, the scope was placed in the usual port and dissection begun by taking down the white line of Toldt, so that the colon could be retracted medially. This exposed the duodenum, which was gently swept off the inferior vena cava and dissection easily disclosed the takeoff of the right renal vein off the cava. Next, attention was directed inferiorly and the ureter was divided between clips and the inferior tongue of Gerota fascia was taken down, so that the psoas muscle was exposed. The attachments lateral to the kidney was taken down, so that the kidney could be flipped anteriorly and medially, and this helped in exposing the renal artery. The renal artery had been previously noticed on the CT scan to branch early and so each branch was separately ligated and divided using the stapler device. After the arteries had been divided, the renal vein was divided again using a stapling device. The remaining attachments superior to the kidney were divided with the Harmonic scalpel and also utilized the stapler, and the specimen was removed. Reexamination of the renal fossa at low pressures showed a minimal degree of oozing from the adrenal gland, which was controlled with Surgicel. Next, the port sites were closed with 0 Vicryl utilizing the passer and doing it over the hand to prevent injury to the bowel and the right lower quadrant incision for the hand port was closed in the usual fashion. The estimated blood loss was negligible. There were no complications. The patient tolerated the procedure well and left the operating room in satisfactory condition.

preoperative diagnosis right renal masspostoperative diagnosis right renal massprocedure right radical nephrectomy assisted laparoscopic approachanesthesia generalprocedure detail patient underwent general anesthesia endotracheal intubation orogastric placed foley catheter placed placed modified flank position hips rotated degrees pillow used prevent pressure points widely shaved prepped draped marking pen used delineate site pneumo sleeve right lower quadrant trocar sites midline umbilicus halfway xiphoid umbilicus incision made premarked site skin subcutaneous tissue aponeurosis external oblique incised direction fibers musclesplitting incision made internal oblique transversus abdominis peritoneum opened pneumo sleeve placed usual fashion sure bowel trapped inside ring abdominal insufflation carried pneumo sleeve scope passed pneumo sleeve visualize placement trocars two positions completed scope placed usual port dissection begun taking white line toldt colon could retracted medially exposed duodenum gently swept inferior vena cava dissection easily disclosed takeoff right renal vein cava next attention directed inferiorly ureter divided clips inferior tongue gerota fascia taken psoas muscle exposed attachments lateral kidney taken kidney could flipped anteriorly medially helped exposing renal artery renal artery previously noticed ct scan branch early branch separately ligated divided using stapler device arteries divided renal vein divided using stapling device remaining attachments superior kidney divided harmonic scalpel also utilized stapler specimen removed reexamination renal fossa low pressures showed minimal degree oozing adrenal gland controlled surgicel next port sites closed vicryl utilizing passer hand prevent injury bowel right lower quadrant incision hand port closed usual fashion estimated blood loss negligible complications patient tolerated procedure well left operating room satisfactory condition

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right renal mass.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right renal mass.,PROCEDURE: , Right radical nephrectomy and assisted laparoscopic approach.,ANESTHESIA: ,General.,PROCEDURE IN DETAIL: ,The patient underwent general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. An orogastric was placed and a Foley catheter placed. He was placed in a modified flank position with the hips rotated to 45 degrees. Pillow was used to prevent any pressure points. He was widely shaved, prepped, and draped. A marking pen was used to delineate a site for the Pneumo sleeve in the right lower quadrant and for the trocar sites in the midline just above the umbilicus and halfway between the xiphoid and the umbilicus. The incision was made through the premarked site through the skin and subcutaneous tissue. The aponeurosis of the external oblique was incised in the direction of its fibers. Muscle-splitting incision was made in the internal oblique and transversus abdominis. The peritoneum was opened and the Pneumo sleeve was placed in the usual fashion being sure that no bowel was trapped inside the ring. Then, abdominal insufflation was carried out through the Pneumo sleeve and the scope was passed through the Pneumo sleeve to visualize placement of the trocars in the other two positions. Once this had been completed, the scope was placed in the usual port and dissection begun by taking down the white line of Toldt, so that the colon could be retracted medially. This exposed the duodenum, which was gently swept off the inferior vena cava and dissection easily disclosed the takeoff of the right renal vein off the cava. Next, attention was directed inferiorly and the ureter was divided between clips and the inferior tongue of Gerota fascia was taken down, so that the psoas muscle was exposed. The attachments lateral to the kidney was taken down, so that the kidney could be flipped anteriorly and medially, and this helped in exposing the renal artery. The renal artery had been previously noticed on the CT scan to branch early and so each branch was separately ligated and divided using the stapler device. After the arteries had been divided, the renal vein was divided again using a stapling device. The remaining attachments superior to the kidney were divided with the Harmonic scalpel and also utilized the stapler, and the specimen was removed. Reexamination of the renal fossa at low pressures showed a minimal degree of oozing from the adrenal gland, which was controlled with Surgicel. Next, the port sites were closed with 0 Vicryl utilizing the passer and doing it over the hand to prevent injury to the bowel and the right lower quadrant incision for the hand port was closed in the usual fashion. The estimated blood loss was negligible. There were no complications. The patient tolerated the procedure well and left the operating room in satisfactory condition. ### Response: Nephrology, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right temporal lobe intracerebral hemorrhage.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSES:,1. Right temporal lobe intracerebral hemorrhage.,2. Possible tumor versus inflammatory/infectious lesion versus vascular lesion, pending final pathology and microbiology.,PROCEDURES:,1. Emergency right side craniotomy for temporal lobe intracerebral hematoma evacuation and resection of temporal lobe lesion.,2. Biopsy of dura.,3. Microscopic dissection using intraoperative microscope.,SPECIMENS: , Temporal lobe lesion and dura as well as specimen for microbiology for culture.,DRAINS:, Medium Hemovac drain.,FINDINGS: , Vascular hemorrhagic lesion including inflamed dura and edematous brain with significant mass effect, and intracerebral hematoma with a history of significant headache, probable seizures, nausea, and vomiting.,ANESTHESIA: , General.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS: , Per Anesthesia.,FLUIDS: , One unit of packed red blood cells given intraoperatively.,The patient was brought to the operating room emergently. This is considered as a life threatening admission with a hemorrhage in the temporal lobe extending into the frontal lobe and with significant mass effect.,The patient apparently became hemiplegic suddenly today. She also had an episode of incoherence and loss of consciousness as well as loss of bowel/urine.,She was brought to Emergency Room where a CT of the brain showed that she had significant hemorrhage of the right temporal lobe extending into the external capsule and across into the frontal lobe. There is significant mass effect. There is mixed density in the parenchyma of the temporal lobe.,She was originally scheduled for elective craniotomy for biopsy of the temporal lobe to find out why she was having spontaneous hemorrhages. However, this event triggered her family to bring her to the emergency room, and this is considered a life threatening admission now with a significant mass effect, and thus we will proceed directly today for evacuation of ICH as well as biopsy of the temporal lobe as well as the dura.,PROCEDURE IN DETAIL: , The patient was anesthetized by the anesthesiology team. Appropriate central line as well as arterial line, Foley catheter, TED, and SCDs were placed. The patient was positioned supine with a three-point Mayfield head pin holder. Her scalp was prepped and draped in a sterile manner. Her former incisional scar was barely and faintly noticed; however, through the same scalp scar, the same incision was made and extended slightly inferiorly. The scalp was resected anteriorly. The subdural scar was noted, and hemostasis was achieved using Bovie cautery. The temporalis muscle was reflected along with the scalp in a subperiosteal manner, and the titanium plating system was then exposed.,The titanium plating system was then removed in its entirety. The bone appeared to be quite fused in multiple points, and there were significant granulation tissue through the burr hole covers.,The granulation tissue was quite hemorrhagic, and hemostasis was achieved using bipolar cautery as well as Bovie cautery.,The bone flap was then removed using Leksell rongeur, and the underlying dura was inspected. It was quite full. The 4-0 sutures from the previous durotomy closure was inspected, and more of the inferior temporal bone was resected using high-speed drill in combination with Leksell rongeur. The sphenoid wing was also resected using a high-speed drill as well as angled rongeur.,Hemostasis was achieved on the fresh bony edges using bone wax. The dura pack-up stitches were noted around the periphery from the previous craniotomy. This was left in place.,The microscope was then brought in to use for the remainder of the procedure until closure. Using a #15 blade, a new durotomy was then made. Then, the durotomy was carried out using Metzenbaum scissors, then reflected the dura anteriorly in a horseshoe manner, placed anteriorly, and this was done under the operating microscope. The underlying brain was quite edematous.,Along the temporal lobe there was a stain of xanthochromia along the surface. Thus a corticectomy was then accomplished using bipolar cautery, and the temporal lobe at this level and the middle temporal gyrus was entered. The parenchyma of the brain did not appear normal. It was quite vascular. Furthermore, there was a hematoma mixed in with the brain itself. Thus a core biopsy was then performed in the temporal tip. The overlying dura was inspected and it was quite thickened, approximately 0.25 cm thick, and it was also highly vascular, and thus a big section of the dura was also trimmed using bipolar cautery followed by scissors, and several pieces of this vascularized dura was resected for pathology. Furthermore, sample of the temporal lobe was cultured.,Hemostasis after evacuation of the intracerebral hematoma using controlled suction as well as significant biopsy of the overlying dura as well as intraparenchymal lesion was accomplished. No attempt was made to enter into the sylvian fissure. Once hemostasis was meticulously achieved, the brain was inspected. It still was quite swollen, known that there was still hematoma in the parenchyma of the brain. However, at this time it was felt that since there is no diagnosis made intraoperatively, we would need to stage this surgery further should it be needed once the diagnosis is confirmed. DuraGen was then used for duraplasty because of the resected dura. The bone flap was then repositioned using Lorenz plating system. Then a medium Hemovac drain was placed in subdural space. Temporalis muscle was approximated using 2-0 Vicryl. The galea was then reapproximated using inverted 2-0 Vicryl. The scalp was then reapproximated using staples. The head was then dressed and wrapped in a sterile fashion.,She was witnessed to be extubated in the operating room postoperatively, and she followed commands briskly. The pupils are 3 mm bilaterally reactive to light. I accompanied her and transported her to the ICU where I signed out to the ICU attending.

preoperative diagnosis right temporal lobe intracerebral hemorrhagepostoperative diagnoses right temporal lobe intracerebral hemorrhage possible tumor versus inflammatoryinfectious lesion versus vascular lesion pending final pathology microbiologyprocedures emergency right side craniotomy temporal lobe intracerebral hematoma evacuation resection temporal lobe lesion biopsy dura microscopic dissection using intraoperative microscopespecimens temporal lobe lesion dura well specimen microbiology culturedrains medium hemovac drainfindings vascular hemorrhagic lesion including inflamed dura edematous brain significant mass effect intracerebral hematoma history significant headache probable seizures nausea vomitinganesthesia generalestimated blood loss per anesthesiafluids one unit packed red blood cells given intraoperativelythe patient brought operating room emergently considered life threatening admission hemorrhage temporal lobe extending frontal lobe significant mass effectthe patient apparently became hemiplegic suddenly today also episode incoherence loss consciousness well loss bowelurineshe brought emergency room ct brain showed significant hemorrhage right temporal lobe extending external capsule across frontal lobe significant mass effect mixed density parenchyma temporal lobeshe originally scheduled elective craniotomy biopsy temporal lobe find spontaneous hemorrhages however event triggered family bring emergency room considered life threatening admission significant mass effect thus proceed directly today evacuation ich well biopsy temporal lobe well duraprocedure detail patient anesthetized anesthesiology team appropriate central line well arterial line foley catheter ted scds placed patient positioned supine threepoint mayfield head pin holder scalp prepped draped sterile manner former incisional scar barely faintly noticed however scalp scar incision made extended slightly inferiorly scalp resected anteriorly subdural scar noted hemostasis achieved using bovie cautery temporalis muscle reflected along scalp subperiosteal manner titanium plating system exposedthe titanium plating system removed entirety bone appeared quite fused multiple points significant granulation tissue burr hole coversthe granulation tissue quite hemorrhagic hemostasis achieved using bipolar cautery well bovie cauterythe bone flap removed using leksell rongeur underlying dura inspected quite full sutures previous durotomy closure inspected inferior temporal bone resected using highspeed drill combination leksell rongeur sphenoid wing also resected using highspeed drill well angled rongeurhemostasis achieved fresh bony edges using bone wax dura packup stitches noted around periphery previous craniotomy left placethe microscope brought use remainder procedure closure using blade new durotomy made durotomy carried using metzenbaum scissors reflected dura anteriorly horseshoe manner placed anteriorly done operating microscope underlying brain quite edematousalong temporal lobe stain xanthochromia along surface thus corticectomy accomplished using bipolar cautery temporal lobe level middle temporal gyrus entered parenchyma brain appear normal quite vascular furthermore hematoma mixed brain thus core biopsy performed temporal tip overlying dura inspected quite thickened approximately cm thick also highly vascular thus big section dura also trimmed using bipolar cautery followed scissors several pieces vascularized dura resected pathology furthermore sample temporal lobe culturedhemostasis evacuation intracerebral hematoma using controlled suction well significant biopsy overlying dura well intraparenchymal lesion accomplished attempt made enter sylvian fissure hemostasis meticulously achieved brain inspected still quite swollen known still hematoma parenchyma brain however time felt since diagnosis made intraoperatively would need stage surgery needed diagnosis confirmed duragen used duraplasty resected dura bone flap repositioned using lorenz plating system medium hemovac drain placed subdural space temporalis muscle approximated using vicryl galea reapproximated using inverted vicryl scalp reapproximated using staples head dressed wrapped sterile fashionshe witnessed extubated operating room postoperatively followed commands briskly pupils mm bilaterally reactive light accompanied transported icu signed icu attending

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right temporal lobe intracerebral hemorrhage.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSES:,1. Right temporal lobe intracerebral hemorrhage.,2. Possible tumor versus inflammatory/infectious lesion versus vascular lesion, pending final pathology and microbiology.,PROCEDURES:,1. Emergency right side craniotomy for temporal lobe intracerebral hematoma evacuation and resection of temporal lobe lesion.,2. Biopsy of dura.,3. Microscopic dissection using intraoperative microscope.,SPECIMENS: , Temporal lobe lesion and dura as well as specimen for microbiology for culture.,DRAINS:, Medium Hemovac drain.,FINDINGS: , Vascular hemorrhagic lesion including inflamed dura and edematous brain with significant mass effect, and intracerebral hematoma with a history of significant headache, probable seizures, nausea, and vomiting.,ANESTHESIA: , General.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS: , Per Anesthesia.,FLUIDS: , One unit of packed red blood cells given intraoperatively.,The patient was brought to the operating room emergently. This is considered as a life threatening admission with a hemorrhage in the temporal lobe extending into the frontal lobe and with significant mass effect.,The patient apparently became hemiplegic suddenly today. She also had an episode of incoherence and loss of consciousness as well as loss of bowel/urine.,She was brought to Emergency Room where a CT of the brain showed that she had significant hemorrhage of the right temporal lobe extending into the external capsule and across into the frontal lobe. There is significant mass effect. There is mixed density in the parenchyma of the temporal lobe.,She was originally scheduled for elective craniotomy for biopsy of the temporal lobe to find out why she was having spontaneous hemorrhages. However, this event triggered her family to bring her to the emergency room, and this is considered a life threatening admission now with a significant mass effect, and thus we will proceed directly today for evacuation of ICH as well as biopsy of the temporal lobe as well as the dura.,PROCEDURE IN DETAIL: , The patient was anesthetized by the anesthesiology team. Appropriate central line as well as arterial line, Foley catheter, TED, and SCDs were placed. The patient was positioned supine with a three-point Mayfield head pin holder. Her scalp was prepped and draped in a sterile manner. Her former incisional scar was barely and faintly noticed; however, through the same scalp scar, the same incision was made and extended slightly inferiorly. The scalp was resected anteriorly. The subdural scar was noted, and hemostasis was achieved using Bovie cautery. The temporalis muscle was reflected along with the scalp in a subperiosteal manner, and the titanium plating system was then exposed.,The titanium plating system was then removed in its entirety. The bone appeared to be quite fused in multiple points, and there were significant granulation tissue through the burr hole covers.,The granulation tissue was quite hemorrhagic, and hemostasis was achieved using bipolar cautery as well as Bovie cautery.,The bone flap was then removed using Leksell rongeur, and the underlying dura was inspected. It was quite full. The 4-0 sutures from the previous durotomy closure was inspected, and more of the inferior temporal bone was resected using high-speed drill in combination with Leksell rongeur. The sphenoid wing was also resected using a high-speed drill as well as angled rongeur.,Hemostasis was achieved on the fresh bony edges using bone wax. The dura pack-up stitches were noted around the periphery from the previous craniotomy. This was left in place.,The microscope was then brought in to use for the remainder of the procedure until closure. Using a #15 blade, a new durotomy was then made. Then, the durotomy was carried out using Metzenbaum scissors, then reflected the dura anteriorly in a horseshoe manner, placed anteriorly, and this was done under the operating microscope. The underlying brain was quite edematous.,Along the temporal lobe there was a stain of xanthochromia along the surface. Thus a corticectomy was then accomplished using bipolar cautery, and the temporal lobe at this level and the middle temporal gyrus was entered. The parenchyma of the brain did not appear normal. It was quite vascular. Furthermore, there was a hematoma mixed in with the brain itself. Thus a core biopsy was then performed in the temporal tip. The overlying dura was inspected and it was quite thickened, approximately 0.25 cm thick, and it was also highly vascular, and thus a big section of the dura was also trimmed using bipolar cautery followed by scissors, and several pieces of this vascularized dura was resected for pathology. Furthermore, sample of the temporal lobe was cultured.,Hemostasis after evacuation of the intracerebral hematoma using controlled suction as well as significant biopsy of the overlying dura as well as intraparenchymal lesion was accomplished. No attempt was made to enter into the sylvian fissure. Once hemostasis was meticulously achieved, the brain was inspected. It still was quite swollen, known that there was still hematoma in the parenchyma of the brain. However, at this time it was felt that since there is no diagnosis made intraoperatively, we would need to stage this surgery further should it be needed once the diagnosis is confirmed. DuraGen was then used for duraplasty because of the resected dura. The bone flap was then repositioned using Lorenz plating system. Then a medium Hemovac drain was placed in subdural space. Temporalis muscle was approximated using 2-0 Vicryl. The galea was then reapproximated using inverted 2-0 Vicryl. The scalp was then reapproximated using staples. The head was then dressed and wrapped in a sterile fashion.,She was witnessed to be extubated in the operating room postoperatively, and she followed commands briskly. The pupils are 3 mm bilaterally reactive to light. I accompanied her and transported her to the ICU where I signed out to the ICU attending. ### Response: Neurology, Neurosurgery, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right trigger thumb.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Right trigger thumb.,SURGERY: , Release of A1 pulley, CPT code 26055.,ANESTHESIA:, General LMA.,TOURNIQUET TIME: ,9 minutes at 200 torr.,FINDINGS:, The patient was found to have limitations to extension at the IP joint to the right thumb. He was found to have full extension after release of A1 pulley.,INDICATIONS:, The patient is 2-1/2-year-old. He has a history of a trigger thumb. This was evaluated in the office. He was indicated for release of A1 pulley to allow for full excursion. Risks and benefits including recurrence, infection, and problems with anesthesia were discussed at length with the family. They wanted to proceed.,PROCEDURE:, The patient was brought into the operating room and placed on the operating table in supine position. General anesthesia was induced without incident. He was given a weight-adjusted dose of antibiotics. The right upper extremity was then prepped and draped in a standard fashion. Limb was exsanguinated with an Esmarch bandage. Tourniquet was raised to 200 torr. Transverse incision was then made at the base of thumb. The underlying soft tissues were carefully spread in line longitudinally. The underlying tendon was then identified. The accompanied A1 pulley was also identified. This was incised longitudinally using #11 blade. Inspection of the entire tendon then demonstrated good motion both in flexion and extension. The leaflets of the pulley were easily identified.,The wound was then irrigated and closed. The skin was closed using interrupted #4-0 Monocryl simple sutures. The area was injected with 5 mL of 0.25% Marcaine. The wound was dressed with Xeroform, dry sterile dressings, hand dressing, Kerlix, and Coban. The patient was awakened from anesthesia and taken to the recovery room in good condition. There were no complications. All instrument, sponge, needle counts were correct at the end of case.,PLAN: , The patient will be discharged home. He will return in 1-1/2 weeks for wound inspection.

preoperative diagnosis right trigger thumbpostoperative diagnosis right trigger thumbsurgery release pulley cpt code anesthesia general lmatourniquet time minutes torrfindings patient found limitations extension ip joint right thumb found full extension release pulleyindications patient yearold history trigger thumb evaluated office indicated release pulley allow full excursion risks benefits including recurrence infection problems anesthesia discussed length family wanted proceedprocedure patient brought operating room placed operating table supine position general anesthesia induced without incident given weightadjusted dose antibiotics right upper extremity prepped draped standard fashion limb exsanguinated esmarch bandage tourniquet raised torr transverse incision made base thumb underlying soft tissues carefully spread line longitudinally underlying tendon identified accompanied pulley also identified incised longitudinally using blade inspection entire tendon demonstrated good motion flexion extension leaflets pulley easily identifiedthe wound irrigated closed skin closed using interrupted monocryl simple sutures area injected ml marcaine wound dressed xeroform dry sterile dressings hand dressing kerlix coban patient awakened anesthesia taken recovery room good condition complications instrument sponge needle counts correct end caseplan patient discharged home return weeks wound inspection

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right trigger thumb.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Right trigger thumb.,SURGERY: , Release of A1 pulley, CPT code 26055.,ANESTHESIA:, General LMA.,TOURNIQUET TIME: ,9 minutes at 200 torr.,FINDINGS:, The patient was found to have limitations to extension at the IP joint to the right thumb. He was found to have full extension after release of A1 pulley.,INDICATIONS:, The patient is 2-1/2-year-old. He has a history of a trigger thumb. This was evaluated in the office. He was indicated for release of A1 pulley to allow for full excursion. Risks and benefits including recurrence, infection, and problems with anesthesia were discussed at length with the family. They wanted to proceed.,PROCEDURE:, The patient was brought into the operating room and placed on the operating table in supine position. General anesthesia was induced without incident. He was given a weight-adjusted dose of antibiotics. The right upper extremity was then prepped and draped in a standard fashion. Limb was exsanguinated with an Esmarch bandage. Tourniquet was raised to 200 torr. Transverse incision was then made at the base of thumb. The underlying soft tissues were carefully spread in line longitudinally. The underlying tendon was then identified. The accompanied A1 pulley was also identified. This was incised longitudinally using #11 blade. Inspection of the entire tendon then demonstrated good motion both in flexion and extension. The leaflets of the pulley were easily identified.,The wound was then irrigated and closed. The skin was closed using interrupted #4-0 Monocryl simple sutures. The area was injected with 5 mL of 0.25% Marcaine. The wound was dressed with Xeroform, dry sterile dressings, hand dressing, Kerlix, and Coban. The patient was awakened from anesthesia and taken to the recovery room in good condition. There were no complications. All instrument, sponge, needle counts were correct at the end of case.,PLAN: , The patient will be discharged home. He will return in 1-1/2 weeks for wound inspection. ### Response: Orthopedic, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right tympanic membrane perforation.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right tympanic membrane perforation along with chronic otitis media.,PROCEDURE: , Right ear examination under anesthesia.,INDICATIONS: , The patient is a 15-year-old child with history of a right tympanic membrane perforation following tube placement as well as right conductive hearing loss. Exam in the office revealed a posterior superior right marginal tympanic perforation. Risks and benefits of surgery including risk of bleeding, general anesthesia, hearing loss as well as recurrent perforation were discussed with the mother. The mother wished to proceed with surgery.,FINDINGS:, The patient was brought to the room, placed in supine position, given general endotracheal anesthesia. The postauricular crease was then injected with 1% Xylocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine along with external meatus. An area of the scalp was shaved above the ear and then also 1% Xylocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine injected, a total of 4 mL local anesthetic was used. The ear was then prepped and draped in the usual sterile fashion. The microscope was then brought into view and examining the marginal perforation, the patient was noted to have large granuloma under the tympanic membrane at the anterior border of the drum. The granulation tissue was debrided as much as possible. Decision was made to cancel the tympanoplasty after debriding the middle ear space as much as possible. The middle ear space was filled with Floxin drops. The patient woke up anesthesia, extubated, and brought to recovery room in stable condition. There were no intraoperative complications. Needle and sponge was correct. Estimated blood loss minimal.

preoperative diagnosis right tympanic membrane perforationpostoperative diagnosis right tympanic membrane perforation along chronic otitis mediaprocedure right ear examination anesthesiaindications patient yearold child history right tympanic membrane perforation following tube placement well right conductive hearing loss exam office revealed posterior superior right marginal tympanic perforation risks benefits surgery including risk bleeding general anesthesia hearing loss well recurrent perforation discussed mother mother wished proceed surgeryfindings patient brought room placed supine position given general endotracheal anesthesia postauricular crease injected xylocaine epinephrine along external meatus area scalp shaved ear also xylocaine epinephrine injected total ml local anesthetic used ear prepped draped usual sterile fashion microscope brought view examining marginal perforation patient noted large granuloma tympanic membrane anterior border drum granulation tissue debrided much possible decision made cancel tympanoplasty debriding middle ear space much possible middle ear space filled floxin drops patient woke anesthesia extubated brought recovery room stable condition intraoperative complications needle sponge correct estimated blood loss minimal

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right tympanic membrane perforation.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right tympanic membrane perforation along with chronic otitis media.,PROCEDURE: , Right ear examination under anesthesia.,INDICATIONS: , The patient is a 15-year-old child with history of a right tympanic membrane perforation following tube placement as well as right conductive hearing loss. Exam in the office revealed a posterior superior right marginal tympanic perforation. Risks and benefits of surgery including risk of bleeding, general anesthesia, hearing loss as well as recurrent perforation were discussed with the mother. The mother wished to proceed with surgery.,FINDINGS:, The patient was brought to the room, placed in supine position, given general endotracheal anesthesia. The postauricular crease was then injected with 1% Xylocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine along with external meatus. An area of the scalp was shaved above the ear and then also 1% Xylocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine injected, a total of 4 mL local anesthetic was used. The ear was then prepped and draped in the usual sterile fashion. The microscope was then brought into view and examining the marginal perforation, the patient was noted to have large granuloma under the tympanic membrane at the anterior border of the drum. The granulation tissue was debrided as much as possible. Decision was made to cancel the tympanoplasty after debriding the middle ear space as much as possible. The middle ear space was filled with Floxin drops. The patient woke up anesthesia, extubated, and brought to recovery room in stable condition. There were no intraoperative complications. Needle and sponge was correct. Estimated blood loss minimal. ### Response: ENT - Otolaryngology, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right undescended testis (ectopic position).,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSES:, Right undescended testis (ectopic position), right inguinal hernia.,PROCEDURES: , Right orchiopexy and right inguinal hernia repair.,ANESTHESIA:, General inhalational anesthetic with caudal block.,FLUIDS RECEIVED: ,100 mL of crystalloids.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS: , Less than 5 mL.,SPECIMENS:, No tissues sent to pathology.,TUBES AND DRAINS: , No tubes or drains were used.,INDICATIONS FOR OPERATION: ,The patient is an almost 4-year-old boy with an undescended testis on the right; plan is for repair.,DESCRIPTION OF OPERATION: ,The patient was taken to the operating room; surgical consent, operative site, and patient identification were verified. Once he was anesthetized, a caudal block was placed. He was then placed in the supine position and sterilely prepped and draped. Since the testis was in the ectopic position, we did an upper curvilinear scrotal incision with a 15-blade knife and further extended it with electrocautery. Electrocautery was also used for hemostasis. A subdartos pouch was then created with a curved tenotomy scissors. The tunica vaginalis was grasped with a curved mosquito clamp and then dissected from its gubernacular attachments. As we were dissecting it, we then found the testis itself into the sac, and we opened the sac, and it was found to be slightly atrophic about 12 mm in length and had a type III epididymal attachment, not being attached to the top. We then dissected the hernia sac off of the testis __________ some traction using the straight Joseph scissors and straight and curved mosquito clamps. Once this was dissected off, we then twisted it upon itself, and then dissected it down towards the external ring, but on traction. We then twisted it upon itself, suture ligated it with 3-0 Vicryl and released it, allowing it to spring back into the canal. Once this was done, we then had adequate length of the testis into the scrotal sac. Using a curved mosquito clamp, we grasped the base of the scrotum internally, and using the subcutaneous tissue, we tacked it to the base of the testis using a 4-0 chromic suture. The testis was then placed into the scrotum in the proper orientation. The upper aspect of the pouch was closed with a pursestring suture of 4-0 chromic. The scrotal skin and dartos were then closed with subcutaneous closure of 4-0 chromic, and Dermabond tissue adhesive was used on the incision. IV Toradol was given. Both testes were well descended in the scrotum at the end of the procedure.

preoperative diagnosis right undescended testis ectopic positionpostoperative diagnoses right undescended testis ectopic position right inguinal herniaprocedures right orchiopexy right inguinal hernia repairanesthesia general inhalational anesthetic caudal blockfluids received ml crystalloidsestimated blood loss less mlspecimens tissues sent pathologytubes drains tubes drains usedindications operation patient almost yearold boy undescended testis right plan repairdescription operation patient taken operating room surgical consent operative site patient identification verified anesthetized caudal block placed placed supine position sterilely prepped draped since testis ectopic position upper curvilinear scrotal incision blade knife extended electrocautery electrocautery also used hemostasis subdartos pouch created curved tenotomy scissors tunica vaginalis grasped curved mosquito clamp dissected gubernacular attachments dissecting found testis sac opened sac found slightly atrophic mm length type iii epididymal attachment attached top dissected hernia sac testis __________ traction using straight joseph scissors straight curved mosquito clamps dissected twisted upon dissected towards external ring traction twisted upon suture ligated vicryl released allowing spring back canal done adequate length testis scrotal sac using curved mosquito clamp grasped base scrotum internally using subcutaneous tissue tacked base testis using chromic suture testis placed scrotum proper orientation upper aspect pouch closed pursestring suture chromic scrotal skin dartos closed subcutaneous closure chromic dermabond tissue adhesive used incision iv toradol given testes well descended scrotum end procedure

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right undescended testis (ectopic position).,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSES:, Right undescended testis (ectopic position), right inguinal hernia.,PROCEDURES: , Right orchiopexy and right inguinal hernia repair.,ANESTHESIA:, General inhalational anesthetic with caudal block.,FLUIDS RECEIVED: ,100 mL of crystalloids.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS: , Less than 5 mL.,SPECIMENS:, No tissues sent to pathology.,TUBES AND DRAINS: , No tubes or drains were used.,INDICATIONS FOR OPERATION: ,The patient is an almost 4-year-old boy with an undescended testis on the right; plan is for repair.,DESCRIPTION OF OPERATION: ,The patient was taken to the operating room; surgical consent, operative site, and patient identification were verified. Once he was anesthetized, a caudal block was placed. He was then placed in the supine position and sterilely prepped and draped. Since the testis was in the ectopic position, we did an upper curvilinear scrotal incision with a 15-blade knife and further extended it with electrocautery. Electrocautery was also used for hemostasis. A subdartos pouch was then created with a curved tenotomy scissors. The tunica vaginalis was grasped with a curved mosquito clamp and then dissected from its gubernacular attachments. As we were dissecting it, we then found the testis itself into the sac, and we opened the sac, and it was found to be slightly atrophic about 12 mm in length and had a type III epididymal attachment, not being attached to the top. We then dissected the hernia sac off of the testis __________ some traction using the straight Joseph scissors and straight and curved mosquito clamps. Once this was dissected off, we then twisted it upon itself, and then dissected it down towards the external ring, but on traction. We then twisted it upon itself, suture ligated it with 3-0 Vicryl and released it, allowing it to spring back into the canal. Once this was done, we then had adequate length of the testis into the scrotal sac. Using a curved mosquito clamp, we grasped the base of the scrotum internally, and using the subcutaneous tissue, we tacked it to the base of the testis using a 4-0 chromic suture. The testis was then placed into the scrotum in the proper orientation. The upper aspect of the pouch was closed with a pursestring suture of 4-0 chromic. The scrotal skin and dartos were then closed with subcutaneous closure of 4-0 chromic, and Dermabond tissue adhesive was used on the incision. IV Toradol was given. Both testes were well descended in the scrotum at the end of the procedure. ### Response: Surgery, Urology

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right upper eyelid squamous cell carcinoma.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right upper eyelid squamous cell carcinoma.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED: , Excision of right upper eyelid squamous cell carcinoma with frozen section and full-thickness skin grafting from the opposite eyelid.,COMPLICATIONS: ,None.,BLOOD LOSS: , Minimal.,ANESTHESIA:, Local with sedation.,INDICATION:, The patient is a 65-year-old male with a large squamous cell carcinoma on his right upper eyelid, which had previous radiation.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: , The patient was taken to the operating room, laid supine, administered intravenous sedation, and prepped and draped in a sterile fashion. He was anesthetized with a combination of 2% lidocaine and 0.5% Marcaine with Epinephrine on both upper eyelids. The area of obvious scar tissue from the radiation for the squamous cell carcinoma on the right upper eyelid was completely excised down to the eyelid margin including resection of a few of the upper eye lashes. This was extended essentially from the punctum to the lateral commissure and extended up on to the upper eyelid. The resection was carried down through the orbicularis muscle resecting the pretarsal orbicularis muscle and the inferior portion of the preseptal orbicularis muscle leaving the tarsus intact and leaving the orbital septum intact. Following complete resection, the patient was easily able to open and close his eyes as the levator muscle insertion was left intact to the tarsal plate. The specimen was sent to pathology, which revealed only fibrotic tissue and no evidence of any residual squamous cell carcinoma. Meticulous hemostasis was obtained with Bovie cautery and a full-thickness skin graft was taken from the opposite upper eyelid in a fashion similar to a blepharoplasty of the appropriate size for the defect in the right upper eyelid. The left upper eyelid incision was closed with 6-0 fast-absorbing gut interrupted sutures, and the skin graft was sutured in place with 6-0 fast-absorbing gut interrupted sutures. An eye patch was placed on the right side, and the patient tolerated the procedure well and was taken to PACU in good condition.

preoperative diagnosis right upper eyelid squamous cell carcinomapostoperative diagnosis right upper eyelid squamous cell carcinomaprocedure performed excision right upper eyelid squamous cell carcinoma frozen section fullthickness skin grafting opposite eyelidcomplications noneblood loss minimalanesthesia local sedationindication patient yearold male large squamous cell carcinoma right upper eyelid previous radiationdescription procedure patient taken operating room laid supine administered intravenous sedation prepped draped sterile fashion anesthetized combination lidocaine marcaine epinephrine upper eyelids area obvious scar tissue radiation squamous cell carcinoma right upper eyelid completely excised eyelid margin including resection upper eye lashes extended essentially punctum lateral commissure extended upper eyelid resection carried orbicularis muscle resecting pretarsal orbicularis muscle inferior portion preseptal orbicularis muscle leaving tarsus intact leaving orbital septum intact following complete resection patient easily able open close eyes levator muscle insertion left intact tarsal plate specimen sent pathology revealed fibrotic tissue evidence residual squamous cell carcinoma meticulous hemostasis obtained bovie cautery fullthickness skin graft taken opposite upper eyelid fashion similar blepharoplasty appropriate size defect right upper eyelid left upper eyelid incision closed fastabsorbing gut interrupted sutures skin graft sutured place fastabsorbing gut interrupted sutures eye patch placed right side patient tolerated procedure well taken pacu good condition

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right upper eyelid squamous cell carcinoma.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right upper eyelid squamous cell carcinoma.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED: , Excision of right upper eyelid squamous cell carcinoma with frozen section and full-thickness skin grafting from the opposite eyelid.,COMPLICATIONS: ,None.,BLOOD LOSS: , Minimal.,ANESTHESIA:, Local with sedation.,INDICATION:, The patient is a 65-year-old male with a large squamous cell carcinoma on his right upper eyelid, which had previous radiation.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: , The patient was taken to the operating room, laid supine, administered intravenous sedation, and prepped and draped in a sterile fashion. He was anesthetized with a combination of 2% lidocaine and 0.5% Marcaine with Epinephrine on both upper eyelids. The area of obvious scar tissue from the radiation for the squamous cell carcinoma on the right upper eyelid was completely excised down to the eyelid margin including resection of a few of the upper eye lashes. This was extended essentially from the punctum to the lateral commissure and extended up on to the upper eyelid. The resection was carried down through the orbicularis muscle resecting the pretarsal orbicularis muscle and the inferior portion of the preseptal orbicularis muscle leaving the tarsus intact and leaving the orbital septum intact. Following complete resection, the patient was easily able to open and close his eyes as the levator muscle insertion was left intact to the tarsal plate. The specimen was sent to pathology, which revealed only fibrotic tissue and no evidence of any residual squamous cell carcinoma. Meticulous hemostasis was obtained with Bovie cautery and a full-thickness skin graft was taken from the opposite upper eyelid in a fashion similar to a blepharoplasty of the appropriate size for the defect in the right upper eyelid. The left upper eyelid incision was closed with 6-0 fast-absorbing gut interrupted sutures, and the skin graft was sutured in place with 6-0 fast-absorbing gut interrupted sutures. An eye patch was placed on the right side, and the patient tolerated the procedure well and was taken to PACU in good condition. ### Response: Hematology - Oncology, Ophthalmology, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right ureteral calculus.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right ureteropelvic junction calculus.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED:,1. Cystourethroscopy.,2. Right retrograde pyelogram.,3. Right double-J stent placement 22 x 4.5 mm.,FIRST SECOND ANESTHESIA: , General.,SPECIMEN:, Urine for culture and sensitivity.,DRAINS: , 22 x 4.5 mm right double-J ureteral stent.,PROCEDURE: , After consent was obtained, the patient was brought to operating room and placed in the supine position. She was given general anesthesia and then placed in the dorsal lithotomy position. A #21 French cystoscope was then passed through the urethra into the bladder. There was noted to be some tightness of the urethra on passage. On visualization of the bladder, there were no stones or any other debris within the bladder. There were no abnormalities seen. No masses, diverticuli, or other abnormal findings. Attention was then turned to the right ureteral orifice and attempts to pass to a cone tip catheter, however, the ureteral orifice was noted to be also tight and we were unable to pass the cone tip catheter. The cone tip catheter was removed and a glidewire was then passed without difficulty up into the renal pelvis. An open-end ureteral catheter was then passed ________ into the distal right ureter. Retrograde pyelogram was then performed.,There was noted to be an UPJ calculus with no noted hydronephrosis. The wire was then passed back through the ureteral catheter. The catheter was removed and a 22 x 4.5 mm double-J ureteral stent was then passed over the glidewire under fluoroscopic and cystoscopic guidance. The stent was clear within the kidney as well as within the bladder. The bladder was drained and the cystoscope was removed. The patient tolerated the procedure well. She will be discharged home. She is to follow up with Dr. X for ESWL procedure. She will be given prescription for Darvocet and will be asked to have a KUB x-ray done prior to her followup and to bring them with her to her appointment.

preoperative diagnosis right ureteral calculuspostoperative diagnosis right ureteropelvic junction calculusprocedure performed cystourethroscopy right retrograde pyelogram right doublej stent placement x mmfirst second anesthesia generalspecimen urine culture sensitivitydrains x mm right doublej ureteral stentprocedure consent obtained patient brought operating room placed supine position given general anesthesia placed dorsal lithotomy position french cystoscope passed urethra bladder noted tightness urethra passage visualization bladder stones debris within bladder abnormalities seen masses diverticuli abnormal findings attention turned right ureteral orifice attempts pass cone tip catheter however ureteral orifice noted also tight unable pass cone tip catheter cone tip catheter removed glidewire passed without difficulty renal pelvis openend ureteral catheter passed ________ distal right ureter retrograde pyelogram performedthere noted upj calculus noted hydronephrosis wire passed back ureteral catheter catheter removed x mm doublej ureteral stent passed glidewire fluoroscopic cystoscopic guidance stent clear within kidney well within bladder bladder drained cystoscope removed patient tolerated procedure well discharged home follow dr x eswl procedure given prescription darvocet asked kub xray done prior followup bring appointment

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right ureteral calculus.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right ureteropelvic junction calculus.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED:,1. Cystourethroscopy.,2. Right retrograde pyelogram.,3. Right double-J stent placement 22 x 4.5 mm.,FIRST SECOND ANESTHESIA: , General.,SPECIMEN:, Urine for culture and sensitivity.,DRAINS: , 22 x 4.5 mm right double-J ureteral stent.,PROCEDURE: , After consent was obtained, the patient was brought to operating room and placed in the supine position. She was given general anesthesia and then placed in the dorsal lithotomy position. A #21 French cystoscope was then passed through the urethra into the bladder. There was noted to be some tightness of the urethra on passage. On visualization of the bladder, there were no stones or any other debris within the bladder. There were no abnormalities seen. No masses, diverticuli, or other abnormal findings. Attention was then turned to the right ureteral orifice and attempts to pass to a cone tip catheter, however, the ureteral orifice was noted to be also tight and we were unable to pass the cone tip catheter. The cone tip catheter was removed and a glidewire was then passed without difficulty up into the renal pelvis. An open-end ureteral catheter was then passed ________ into the distal right ureter. Retrograde pyelogram was then performed.,There was noted to be an UPJ calculus with no noted hydronephrosis. The wire was then passed back through the ureteral catheter. The catheter was removed and a 22 x 4.5 mm double-J ureteral stent was then passed over the glidewire under fluoroscopic and cystoscopic guidance. The stent was clear within the kidney as well as within the bladder. The bladder was drained and the cystoscope was removed. The patient tolerated the procedure well. She will be discharged home. She is to follow up with Dr. X for ESWL procedure. She will be given prescription for Darvocet and will be asked to have a KUB x-ray done prior to her followup and to bring them with her to her appointment. ### Response: Surgery, Urology

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right wrist pain with an x-ray showing a scapholunate arthritic collapse pattern arthritis with osteophytic spurring of the radial styloid and a volar radial wrist mass suspected of being a volar radial ganglion.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right wrist pain with an x-ray showing a scapholunate arthritic collapse pattern arthritis with osteophytic spurring of the radial styloid and a volar radial wrist mass suspected of being a volar radial ganglion; finding of volar radial wrist mass of bulging inflammatory tenosynovitis from the volar radial wrist joint rather than a true ganglion cyst; synovitis was debrided and removed.,PROCEDURE: , Excision of volar radial wrist mass (inflammatory synovitis) and radial styloidectomy, right wrist.,ANESTHESIA:, Axillary block plus IV sedation.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS:, Zero.,SPECIMENS,1. Inflammatory synovitis from the volar radial wrist area.,2. Inflammatory synovitis from the dorsal wrist area.,DRAINS:, None.,PROCEDURE DETAIL: , Patient brought to the operating room. After induction of IV sedation a right upper extremity axillary block anesthetic was performed by anesthesia staff. Routine prep and drape was employed. Patient received 1 gm of IV Ancef preoperatively. Arm was exsanguinated by means of elevation of Esmarch elastic tourniquet. Tourniquet inflated to 250 mmHg pressure. Hand positioned palm up in a lead hand-holder. A longitudinal zigzag incision over the volar radial wrist mass was made. Skin was sharply incised. Careful blunt dissection was used in the subcutaneous tissue. Antebrachial fascia was bluntly dissected and incised to reveal the radial artery. Radial artery was mobilized preserving its dorsal and palmar branches. Small transverse concomitant vein branches were divided to facilitate mobilization of the radial artery. Wrist mass was exposed by blunt dissection. This appeared to be an inflammatory arthritic mass from the volar radial wrist capsule. This was debrided down to the wrist capsule with visualization of the joint through a small capsular window. After complete volar synovectomy the capsular window was closed with 4-0 Mersilene figure-of-eight suture. Subcutaneous tissue was closed with 4-0 PDS and the skin was closed with a running subcuticular 4-0 Prolene. Forearm was pronated and C-arm image intensifier was used to confirm localization of the radial styloid for marking of the skin incision. An oblique incision overlying the radial styloid centered on the second extensor compartment was made. Skin was sharply incised. Blunt dissection was used in the subcutaneous tissue. Care was taken to identify and protect the superficial radial nerve. Blunt dissection was carried out in the extensor retinaculum. This was incised longitudinally over the second extensor compartment. EPL tendon was identified, mobilized and released to facilitate retraction and prevent injury. The interval between the ECRL and the ECRB was developed down to bone. Dorsal capsulotomy was made and local synovitis was identified. This was debrided and sent as second pathologic specimen. Articular surface of the scaphoid was identified and seen to be completely devoid of articular cartilage with hard, eburnated subchondral bone consistent with a SLAC pattern arthritis. Radial styloid had extensive spurring and was exposed subperiosteally and osteotomized in a dorsal oblique fashion preserving the volar cortex as the attachment point of the deep volar carpal ligament layer. Dorsally the styloidectomy was beveled smooth and contoured with a rongeur. Final x-rays documenting the styloidectomy were obtained. Local synovitis beneath the joint capsule was debrided. Remnants of the scapholunate interosseous which was completely deteriorated were debrided. The joint capsule was closed anatomically with 4-0 PDS and extensor retinaculum was closed with 4-0 PDS. Subcutaneous tissues closed with 4-0 Vicryl. Skin was closed with running subcuticular 4-0 Prolene. Steri-Strips were applied to wound edge closure; 10 cc of 0.5% plain Marcaine was infiltrated into the areas of the surgical incisions and radial styloidectomy for postoperative analgesia. A bulky gently compressive wrist and forearm bandage incorporating an EBI cooling pad were applied. Tourniquet was deflated. Good vascular color and capillary refill were seen to return to the tips of all digits. Patient discharged to the ambulatory recovery area and from there discharged home.,DISCHARGE PRESCRIPTIONS:,1. Keflex 500 mg tablets, #20, one PO q.6h. x 5 days.,2. Vicodin, 40 tablets, one to two PO q.4h. p.r.n.,3. Percocet, #20 tablets, one to two PO q.3-4h. p.r.n. severe pain.

preoperative diagnosis right wrist pain xray showing scapholunate arthritic collapse pattern arthritis osteophytic spurring radial styloid volar radial wrist mass suspected volar radial ganglionpostoperative diagnosis right wrist pain xray showing scapholunate arthritic collapse pattern arthritis osteophytic spurring radial styloid volar radial wrist mass suspected volar radial ganglion finding volar radial wrist mass bulging inflammatory tenosynovitis volar radial wrist joint rather true ganglion cyst synovitis debrided removedprocedure excision volar radial wrist mass inflammatory synovitis radial styloidectomy right wristanesthesia axillary block plus iv sedationestimated blood loss zerospecimens inflammatory synovitis volar radial wrist area inflammatory synovitis dorsal wrist areadrains noneprocedure detail patient brought operating room induction iv sedation right upper extremity axillary block anesthetic performed anesthesia staff routine prep drape employed patient received gm iv ancef preoperatively arm exsanguinated means elevation esmarch elastic tourniquet tourniquet inflated mmhg pressure hand positioned palm lead handholder longitudinal zigzag incision volar radial wrist mass made skin sharply incised careful blunt dissection used subcutaneous tissue antebrachial fascia bluntly dissected incised reveal radial artery radial artery mobilized preserving dorsal palmar branches small transverse concomitant vein branches divided facilitate mobilization radial artery wrist mass exposed blunt dissection appeared inflammatory arthritic mass volar radial wrist capsule debrided wrist capsule visualization joint small capsular window complete volar synovectomy capsular window closed mersilene figureofeight suture subcutaneous tissue closed pds skin closed running subcuticular prolene forearm pronated carm image intensifier used confirm localization radial styloid marking skin incision oblique incision overlying radial styloid centered second extensor compartment made skin sharply incised blunt dissection used subcutaneous tissue care taken identify protect superficial radial nerve blunt dissection carried extensor retinaculum incised longitudinally second extensor compartment epl tendon identified mobilized released facilitate retraction prevent injury interval ecrl ecrb developed bone dorsal capsulotomy made local synovitis identified debrided sent second pathologic specimen articular surface scaphoid identified seen completely devoid articular cartilage hard eburnated subchondral bone consistent slac pattern arthritis radial styloid extensive spurring exposed subperiosteally osteotomized dorsal oblique fashion preserving volar cortex attachment point deep volar carpal ligament layer dorsally styloidectomy beveled smooth contoured rongeur final xrays documenting styloidectomy obtained local synovitis beneath joint capsule debrided remnants scapholunate interosseous completely deteriorated debrided joint capsule closed anatomically pds extensor retinaculum closed pds subcutaneous tissues closed vicryl skin closed running subcuticular prolene steristrips applied wound edge closure cc plain marcaine infiltrated areas surgical incisions radial styloidectomy postoperative analgesia bulky gently compressive wrist forearm bandage incorporating ebi cooling pad applied tourniquet deflated good vascular color capillary refill seen return tips digits patient discharged ambulatory recovery area discharged homedischarge prescriptions keflex mg tablets one po qh x days vicodin tablets one two po qh prn percocet tablets one two po qh prn severe pain

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right wrist pain with an x-ray showing a scapholunate arthritic collapse pattern arthritis with osteophytic spurring of the radial styloid and a volar radial wrist mass suspected of being a volar radial ganglion.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Right wrist pain with an x-ray showing a scapholunate arthritic collapse pattern arthritis with osteophytic spurring of the radial styloid and a volar radial wrist mass suspected of being a volar radial ganglion; finding of volar radial wrist mass of bulging inflammatory tenosynovitis from the volar radial wrist joint rather than a true ganglion cyst; synovitis was debrided and removed.,PROCEDURE: , Excision of volar radial wrist mass (inflammatory synovitis) and radial styloidectomy, right wrist.,ANESTHESIA:, Axillary block plus IV sedation.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS:, Zero.,SPECIMENS,1. Inflammatory synovitis from the volar radial wrist area.,2. Inflammatory synovitis from the dorsal wrist area.,DRAINS:, None.,PROCEDURE DETAIL: , Patient brought to the operating room. After induction of IV sedation a right upper extremity axillary block anesthetic was performed by anesthesia staff. Routine prep and drape was employed. Patient received 1 gm of IV Ancef preoperatively. Arm was exsanguinated by means of elevation of Esmarch elastic tourniquet. Tourniquet inflated to 250 mmHg pressure. Hand positioned palm up in a lead hand-holder. A longitudinal zigzag incision over the volar radial wrist mass was made. Skin was sharply incised. Careful blunt dissection was used in the subcutaneous tissue. Antebrachial fascia was bluntly dissected and incised to reveal the radial artery. Radial artery was mobilized preserving its dorsal and palmar branches. Small transverse concomitant vein branches were divided to facilitate mobilization of the radial artery. Wrist mass was exposed by blunt dissection. This appeared to be an inflammatory arthritic mass from the volar radial wrist capsule. This was debrided down to the wrist capsule with visualization of the joint through a small capsular window. After complete volar synovectomy the capsular window was closed with 4-0 Mersilene figure-of-eight suture. Subcutaneous tissue was closed with 4-0 PDS and the skin was closed with a running subcuticular 4-0 Prolene. Forearm was pronated and C-arm image intensifier was used to confirm localization of the radial styloid for marking of the skin incision. An oblique incision overlying the radial styloid centered on the second extensor compartment was made. Skin was sharply incised. Blunt dissection was used in the subcutaneous tissue. Care was taken to identify and protect the superficial radial nerve. Blunt dissection was carried out in the extensor retinaculum. This was incised longitudinally over the second extensor compartment. EPL tendon was identified, mobilized and released to facilitate retraction and prevent injury. The interval between the ECRL and the ECRB was developed down to bone. Dorsal capsulotomy was made and local synovitis was identified. This was debrided and sent as second pathologic specimen. Articular surface of the scaphoid was identified and seen to be completely devoid of articular cartilage with hard, eburnated subchondral bone consistent with a SLAC pattern arthritis. Radial styloid had extensive spurring and was exposed subperiosteally and osteotomized in a dorsal oblique fashion preserving the volar cortex as the attachment point of the deep volar carpal ligament layer. Dorsally the styloidectomy was beveled smooth and contoured with a rongeur. Final x-rays documenting the styloidectomy were obtained. Local synovitis beneath the joint capsule was debrided. Remnants of the scapholunate interosseous which was completely deteriorated were debrided. The joint capsule was closed anatomically with 4-0 PDS and extensor retinaculum was closed with 4-0 PDS. Subcutaneous tissues closed with 4-0 Vicryl. Skin was closed with running subcuticular 4-0 Prolene. Steri-Strips were applied to wound edge closure; 10 cc of 0.5% plain Marcaine was infiltrated into the areas of the surgical incisions and radial styloidectomy for postoperative analgesia. A bulky gently compressive wrist and forearm bandage incorporating an EBI cooling pad were applied. Tourniquet was deflated. Good vascular color and capillary refill were seen to return to the tips of all digits. Patient discharged to the ambulatory recovery area and from there discharged home.,DISCHARGE PRESCRIPTIONS:,1. Keflex 500 mg tablets, #20, one PO q.6h. x 5 days.,2. Vicodin, 40 tablets, one to two PO q.4h. p.r.n.,3. Percocet, #20 tablets, one to two PO q.3-4h. p.r.n. severe pain. ### Response: Orthopedic, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Rotated cuff tear, right shoulder.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSES:,1. Rotated cuff tear, right shoulder.,2. Glenoid labrum tear.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED:,1. Arthroscopy with arthroscopic glenoid labrum debridement.,2. Subacromial decompression.,3. Rotator cuff repair, right shoulder.,SPECIFICATIONS:, Intraoperative procedure was done at Inpatient Operative Suite, room #1 at ABCD Hospital. This was done under interscalene and subsequent general anesthetic in the modified beach chair position.,HISTORY AND GROSS FINDINGS: , The patient is a 48-year-old with male who has been suffering increasing right shoulder pain for a number of months prior to surgical intervention. He was completely refractory to conservative outpatient therapy. After discussing the alternative care as well as the advantages, disadvantages, risks, complications, and expectations, he elected to undergo the above stated procedure on this date.,Intraarticularly, the joint was observed. There was noted to be a degenerative glenoid labrum tear. The biceps complex was otherwise intact. There were minimal degenerative changes at the glenohumeral joint. Rotator cuff tear was appreciated on the inner surface. Subacromially, the same was true. This was an elliptical to V-type tear. The patient has a grossly positive type III acromion.,OPERATIVE PROCEDURE: , The patient was laid supine on the operating table after receiving interscalene and then general anesthetic by the Anesthesia Department. He was safely placed in modified beach chair position. He was prepped and draped in the usual sterile manner. Portals were created outside to end, posterior to anterior, and ultimately laterally in the typical fashion. Upon complete diagnostic arthroscopy was carried out in the intraarticular aspect of the joint, a 4.2 meniscus shaver was placed anteriorly with the scope posteriorly. Debridement was carried out to the glenoid labrum. The biceps was probed and noted to be intact. Undersurface of the rotator cuff was debrided with the shaver along with debridement of the subchondral region of the greater tuberosity attachment.,After this, instrumentation was removed. The scope was placed subacromially and a lateral portal created. Gross bursectomy was carried out in a stepwise fashion to the top part of the cuff as well as in the gutters. An anterolateral portal was created. Sutures were placed via express silk as well as other sutures with a #2 fiber wire. With passing of the suture, they were tied with a slip-tight knot and then two half stitches. There was excellent reduction of the tear. Superolateral portal was then created. A #1 Mitek suture anchor was then placed in the posterior cuff to bring this over to bleeding bone. _______ suture was placed. The implant was put into place. The loop was grabbed and it was impacted in the previously drilled holes. There was excellent reduction of the tear.,Trial range of motion was carried out and seemed to be satisfactory.,Prior to this, a subacromial decompression was accomplished after release of CA ligament with the vapor Bovie. A 4.8 motorized barrel burr was utilized to sequentially take this down from the type III acromion to a flat type I acromion.,After all was done, copious irrigation was carried out throughout the joint. Gross bursectomy lightly was carried out to remove all bony elements. A pain buster catheter was placed through a separate portal and cut to length. 0.5% Marcaine was instilled after portals were closed with #4-0 nylon. Adaptic, 4 x 4s, ABDs, and Elastoplast tape placed for dressing. The patient was ultimately transferred to his cart and PACU in apparent satisfactory condition. Expected surgical prognosis of this patient is fair.

preoperative diagnosis rotated cuff tear right shoulderpostoperative diagnoses rotated cuff tear right shoulder glenoid labrum tearprocedure performed arthroscopy arthroscopic glenoid labrum debridement subacromial decompression rotator cuff repair right shoulderspecifications intraoperative procedure done inpatient operative suite room abcd hospital done interscalene subsequent general anesthetic modified beach chair positionhistory gross findings patient yearold male suffering increasing right shoulder pain number months prior surgical intervention completely refractory conservative outpatient therapy discussing alternative care well advantages disadvantages risks complications expectations elected undergo stated procedure dateintraarticularly joint observed noted degenerative glenoid labrum tear biceps complex otherwise intact minimal degenerative changes glenohumeral joint rotator cuff tear appreciated inner surface subacromially true elliptical vtype tear patient grossly positive type iii acromionoperative procedure patient laid supine operating table receiving interscalene general anesthetic anesthesia department safely placed modified beach chair position prepped draped usual sterile manner portals created outside end posterior anterior ultimately laterally typical fashion upon complete diagnostic arthroscopy carried intraarticular aspect joint meniscus shaver placed anteriorly scope posteriorly debridement carried glenoid labrum biceps probed noted intact undersurface rotator cuff debrided shaver along debridement subchondral region greater tuberosity attachmentafter instrumentation removed scope placed subacromially lateral portal created gross bursectomy carried stepwise fashion top part cuff well gutters anterolateral portal created sutures placed via express silk well sutures fiber wire passing suture tied sliptight knot two half stitches excellent reduction tear superolateral portal created mitek suture anchor placed posterior cuff bring bleeding bone _______ suture placed implant put place loop grabbed impacted previously drilled holes excellent reduction teartrial range motion carried seemed satisfactoryprior subacromial decompression accomplished release ca ligament vapor bovie motorized barrel burr utilized sequentially take type iii acromion flat type acromionafter done copious irrigation carried throughout joint gross bursectomy lightly carried remove bony elements pain buster catheter placed separate portal cut length marcaine instilled portals closed nylon adaptic x abds elastoplast tape placed dressing patient ultimately transferred cart pacu apparent satisfactory condition expected surgical prognosis patient fair

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Rotated cuff tear, right shoulder.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSES:,1. Rotated cuff tear, right shoulder.,2. Glenoid labrum tear.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED:,1. Arthroscopy with arthroscopic glenoid labrum debridement.,2. Subacromial decompression.,3. Rotator cuff repair, right shoulder.,SPECIFICATIONS:, Intraoperative procedure was done at Inpatient Operative Suite, room #1 at ABCD Hospital. This was done under interscalene and subsequent general anesthetic in the modified beach chair position.,HISTORY AND GROSS FINDINGS: , The patient is a 48-year-old with male who has been suffering increasing right shoulder pain for a number of months prior to surgical intervention. He was completely refractory to conservative outpatient therapy. After discussing the alternative care as well as the advantages, disadvantages, risks, complications, and expectations, he elected to undergo the above stated procedure on this date.,Intraarticularly, the joint was observed. There was noted to be a degenerative glenoid labrum tear. The biceps complex was otherwise intact. There were minimal degenerative changes at the glenohumeral joint. Rotator cuff tear was appreciated on the inner surface. Subacromially, the same was true. This was an elliptical to V-type tear. The patient has a grossly positive type III acromion.,OPERATIVE PROCEDURE: , The patient was laid supine on the operating table after receiving interscalene and then general anesthetic by the Anesthesia Department. He was safely placed in modified beach chair position. He was prepped and draped in the usual sterile manner. Portals were created outside to end, posterior to anterior, and ultimately laterally in the typical fashion. Upon complete diagnostic arthroscopy was carried out in the intraarticular aspect of the joint, a 4.2 meniscus shaver was placed anteriorly with the scope posteriorly. Debridement was carried out to the glenoid labrum. The biceps was probed and noted to be intact. Undersurface of the rotator cuff was debrided with the shaver along with debridement of the subchondral region of the greater tuberosity attachment.,After this, instrumentation was removed. The scope was placed subacromially and a lateral portal created. Gross bursectomy was carried out in a stepwise fashion to the top part of the cuff as well as in the gutters. An anterolateral portal was created. Sutures were placed via express silk as well as other sutures with a #2 fiber wire. With passing of the suture, they were tied with a slip-tight knot and then two half stitches. There was excellent reduction of the tear. Superolateral portal was then created. A #1 Mitek suture anchor was then placed in the posterior cuff to bring this over to bleeding bone. _______ suture was placed. The implant was put into place. The loop was grabbed and it was impacted in the previously drilled holes. There was excellent reduction of the tear.,Trial range of motion was carried out and seemed to be satisfactory.,Prior to this, a subacromial decompression was accomplished after release of CA ligament with the vapor Bovie. A 4.8 motorized barrel burr was utilized to sequentially take this down from the type III acromion to a flat type I acromion.,After all was done, copious irrigation was carried out throughout the joint. Gross bursectomy lightly was carried out to remove all bony elements. A pain buster catheter was placed through a separate portal and cut to length. 0.5% Marcaine was instilled after portals were closed with #4-0 nylon. Adaptic, 4 x 4s, ABDs, and Elastoplast tape placed for dressing. The patient was ultimately transferred to his cart and PACU in apparent satisfactory condition. Expected surgical prognosis of this patient is fair. ### Response: Orthopedic, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Rotator cuff tear, left.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSES:,1. Sixty-percent rotator cuff tear, joint side.,2. Impingement syndrome.,ANESTHESIA: , General,NAME OF OPERATION:,1. Arthroscopic subacromial decompression.,2. Repair of rotator cuff through mini-arthrotomy.,FINDINGS AT OPERATION: , The patient's glenohumeral joint was completely clear, other than obvious tear of the rotator cuff. The midportion of this appeared to be complete, but for the most part, this was about a 60% rupture of the tendon. This was confirmed later when the bursal side was opened up. Note, the patient also had abrasion of the coracoacromial ligament under the anterolateral edge of the acromion. He did not have any acromioclavicular joint pain or acromioclavicular joint disease noted.,PROCEDURE:, He was given an anesthetic, examined, prepped, and draped in a sterile fashion in a beach-chair position. The shoulder was instilled with fluid from posteriorly, followed by the arthroscope. The shoulder was instilled with fluid from posteriorly, followed by the arthroscope. Arthroscopy was then carried out in standard fashion using a 30-degree Dionic scope. With the scope in the posterior portal, the above findings were noted, and an anterior portal was established. A curved shaver was placed for debridement of the tear. I established this was about a 60-70% tear with a probable complete area of tear which was very small. There were no problems at the biceps or the rest of the joint. The subacromial space showed findings, as noted above, and a thorough subacromial decompression was carried out with a Bovie, rotary shaver, and bur. I did not debride the acromioclavicular joint. The lateral portal was then extended to a mini-arthrotomy, and subacromial space was entered by blunt dissection through the deltoid. The area of weakness of the tendon was found, and was transversely cut, and findings were confirmed. The diseased tissue was removed, and the greater tuberosity was abraded with a rongeur. Tendon-to-tendon repair was then carried out with buried sutures of 2-0 Ethibond, giving a very nice repair. The shoulder was carried through a range of motion. I could see no evidence of impingement. Copious irrigation was carried out. The deltoid deep fascia was anatomically closed, as was the superficial fascia. The subcutaneous tissue and skin were closed in layers. A sterile dressing was applied. The patient appeared to tolerate the procedure well.

preoperative diagnosis rotator cuff tear leftpostoperative diagnoses sixtypercent rotator cuff tear joint side impingement syndromeanesthesia generalname operation arthroscopic subacromial decompression repair rotator cuff miniarthrotomyfindings operation patients glenohumeral joint completely clear obvious tear rotator cuff midportion appeared complete part rupture tendon confirmed later bursal side opened note patient also abrasion coracoacromial ligament anterolateral edge acromion acromioclavicular joint pain acromioclavicular joint disease notedprocedure given anesthetic examined prepped draped sterile fashion beachchair position shoulder instilled fluid posteriorly followed arthroscope shoulder instilled fluid posteriorly followed arthroscope arthroscopy carried standard fashion using degree dionic scope scope posterior portal findings noted anterior portal established curved shaver placed debridement tear established tear probable complete area tear small problems biceps rest joint subacromial space showed findings noted thorough subacromial decompression carried bovie rotary shaver bur debride acromioclavicular joint lateral portal extended miniarthrotomy subacromial space entered blunt dissection deltoid area weakness tendon found transversely cut findings confirmed diseased tissue removed greater tuberosity abraded rongeur tendontotendon repair carried buried sutures ethibond giving nice repair shoulder carried range motion could see evidence impingement copious irrigation carried deltoid deep fascia anatomically closed superficial fascia subcutaneous tissue skin closed layers sterile dressing applied patient appeared tolerate procedure well

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Rotator cuff tear, left.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSES:,1. Sixty-percent rotator cuff tear, joint side.,2. Impingement syndrome.,ANESTHESIA: , General,NAME OF OPERATION:,1. Arthroscopic subacromial decompression.,2. Repair of rotator cuff through mini-arthrotomy.,FINDINGS AT OPERATION: , The patient's glenohumeral joint was completely clear, other than obvious tear of the rotator cuff. The midportion of this appeared to be complete, but for the most part, this was about a 60% rupture of the tendon. This was confirmed later when the bursal side was opened up. Note, the patient also had abrasion of the coracoacromial ligament under the anterolateral edge of the acromion. He did not have any acromioclavicular joint pain or acromioclavicular joint disease noted.,PROCEDURE:, He was given an anesthetic, examined, prepped, and draped in a sterile fashion in a beach-chair position. The shoulder was instilled with fluid from posteriorly, followed by the arthroscope. The shoulder was instilled with fluid from posteriorly, followed by the arthroscope. Arthroscopy was then carried out in standard fashion using a 30-degree Dionic scope. With the scope in the posterior portal, the above findings were noted, and an anterior portal was established. A curved shaver was placed for debridement of the tear. I established this was about a 60-70% tear with a probable complete area of tear which was very small. There were no problems at the biceps or the rest of the joint. The subacromial space showed findings, as noted above, and a thorough subacromial decompression was carried out with a Bovie, rotary shaver, and bur. I did not debride the acromioclavicular joint. The lateral portal was then extended to a mini-arthrotomy, and subacromial space was entered by blunt dissection through the deltoid. The area of weakness of the tendon was found, and was transversely cut, and findings were confirmed. The diseased tissue was removed, and the greater tuberosity was abraded with a rongeur. Tendon-to-tendon repair was then carried out with buried sutures of 2-0 Ethibond, giving a very nice repair. The shoulder was carried through a range of motion. I could see no evidence of impingement. Copious irrigation was carried out. The deltoid deep fascia was anatomically closed, as was the superficial fascia. The subcutaneous tissue and skin were closed in layers. A sterile dressing was applied. The patient appeared to tolerate the procedure well. ### Response: Orthopedic, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Rotator cuff tear, right shoulder.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Superior labrum anterior and posterior lesion (peel-back), right shoulder.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED:,1. Arthroscopy with arthroscopic SLAP lesion.,2. Repair of soft tissue subacromial decompression rotator cuff repair, right shoulder.,SPECIFICATIONS: , The entire operative procedure was done in Inpatient Operating Suite, room #1 at ABCD General Hospital. This was done under a interscalene block anesthetic and subsequent general anesthetic in the modified beachchair position.,HISTORY AND GROSS FINDINGS: ,This is a 54-year-old white female suffering an increasing right shoulder pain for a few months prior to surgical intervention. She had an injury to her right shoulder when she fell off a bike. She was diagnosed preoperatively with a rotated cuff tear.,Intra-articularly besides we noted a large SLAP lesion, superior and posterior to the attachment of the glenoid labrum from approximately 12:30 back to 10:30. This acted as a peel-back type of mechanism and was displaced into the joint beyond the superior rim of the glenoid. This was an obvious avulsion into subchondral bone with bone exposed. The anterior aspect had degenerative changes, but did not have evidence of avulsion. The subscapular was noted to be intact. On the joint side of the supraspinatus, there was noted to be a laminated type of tearing to the rotated cuff to the anterior and mid-aspect of the supraspinatus attachment.,This was confirmed subacromially. The patient had a type-I plus acromion in outlet view and thus it was elected to not perform a subacromial decompression, but soft tissue release of the CA ligament in a releasing resection type fashion.,OPERATIVE PROCEDURE: , The patient was placed supine upon the operative table after she was given interscalene and then general anesthesia by the Anesthesia Department. She was safely placed in a modified beachchair position. She was prepped and draped in the usual sterile manner. The portals were created from outside the ends, posterior to the scope and anteriorly for an intraoperative portal and then laterally. She had at least two other portals appropriate for both repair mechanisms described above.,Attention was then turned to the SLAP lesion. The edges were debrided both on the bony side as well as soft tissue side. We used the anterior portal to lift up the mechanism and created a superolateral portal through the rotator cuff and into the edge of the labrum. Further debridement was carried out here. A drill hole was made just on the articular surface superiorly for a knotless anchor. A pull-through suture of #2 fiber wire was utilized with the ________. This was pulled through. It was tied to the leader suture of the knotless anchor. This was pulled through and one limb of the anchor loop was grabbed and the anchor impacted with a mallet. There was excellent fixation of the superior labrum. It was noted to be solid and intact. The anchor was placed safely in the bone. There was no room for further knotless or other anchors. After probing was carried out, hard copy Polaroid was obtained.,Attention was then turned to the articular side for the rotator cuff. It was debrided. Subchondral debridement was carried out to the tuberosity also. Care was taken to go to the subchondral region but not beyond. The bone was satisfactory.,Scope was then placed in the subacromial region. Gross bursectomy was carried out with in the lateral portal. This was done throughout as well as in the gutters anterolaterally and posteriorly. Debridement was carried out further to the rotator cuff. Two types of fixation were carried out, one with a superolateral portal a drill hole was made and anchor of the _knotless suture placed after PDS leader suture placed with a Caspari punch. There was an excellent reduction of the tear posteriorly and then anteriorly. Tendon to tendon repair was accomplished by placing a fiber wire across the tendon and tying sutured down through the anterolateral portal. This was done with a sliding stitch and then two half stitches. There was excellent reduction of the tear.,Attention was then turned to the CA ligament. It was released along with periosteum and the undersurface of the anterior acromion. The CA ligament was not only released but resected. There was noted to be no evidence of significant spurring with only a mostly type-I acromion. Thus, it was not elected to perform subacromial decompression for bone with soft tissue only. A pain buster catheter was placed separately. It was cut to length. An interrupted #4-0 nylon was utilized for portal closure. A 0.5% Marcaine was instilled subacromially. Adaptic, 4x4s, ABDs, and Elastoplast tape placed for dressing. The patient's arm was placed in a arm sling. She was transferred to PACU in apparent satisfactory condition. Expected surgical prognosis on this patient is fair.

preoperative diagnosis rotator cuff tear right shoulderpostoperative diagnosis superior labrum anterior posterior lesion peelback right shoulderprocedure performed arthroscopy arthroscopic slap lesion repair soft tissue subacromial decompression rotator cuff repair right shoulderspecifications entire operative procedure done inpatient operating suite room abcd general hospital done interscalene block anesthetic subsequent general anesthetic modified beachchair positionhistory gross findings yearold white female suffering increasing right shoulder pain months prior surgical intervention injury right shoulder fell bike diagnosed preoperatively rotated cuff tearintraarticularly besides noted large slap lesion superior posterior attachment glenoid labrum approximately back acted peelback type mechanism displaced joint beyond superior rim glenoid obvious avulsion subchondral bone bone exposed anterior aspect degenerative changes evidence avulsion subscapular noted intact joint side supraspinatus noted laminated type tearing rotated cuff anterior midaspect supraspinatus attachmentthis confirmed subacromially patient typei plus acromion outlet view thus elected perform subacromial decompression soft tissue release ca ligament releasing resection type fashionoperative procedure patient placed supine upon operative table given interscalene general anesthesia anesthesia department safely placed modified beachchair position prepped draped usual sterile manner portals created outside ends posterior scope anteriorly intraoperative portal laterally least two portals appropriate repair mechanisms described aboveattention turned slap lesion edges debrided bony side well soft tissue side used anterior portal lift mechanism created superolateral portal rotator cuff edge labrum debridement carried drill hole made articular surface superiorly knotless anchor pullthrough suture fiber wire utilized ________ pulled tied leader suture knotless anchor pulled one limb anchor loop grabbed anchor impacted mallet excellent fixation superior labrum noted solid intact anchor placed safely bone room knotless anchors probing carried hard copy polaroid obtainedattention turned articular side rotator cuff debrided subchondral debridement carried tuberosity also care taken go subchondral region beyond bone satisfactoryscope placed subacromial region gross bursectomy carried lateral portal done throughout well gutters anterolaterally posteriorly debridement carried rotator cuff two types fixation carried one superolateral portal drill hole made anchor _knotless suture placed pds leader suture placed caspari punch excellent reduction tear posteriorly anteriorly tendon tendon repair accomplished placing fiber wire across tendon tying sutured anterolateral portal done sliding stitch two half stitches excellent reduction tearattention turned ca ligament released along periosteum undersurface anterior acromion ca ligament released resected noted evidence significant spurring mostly typei acromion thus elected perform subacromial decompression bone soft tissue pain buster catheter placed separately cut length interrupted nylon utilized portal closure marcaine instilled subacromially adaptic xs abds elastoplast tape placed dressing patients arm placed arm sling transferred pacu apparent satisfactory condition expected surgical prognosis patient fair

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Rotator cuff tear, right shoulder.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Superior labrum anterior and posterior lesion (peel-back), right shoulder.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED:,1. Arthroscopy with arthroscopic SLAP lesion.,2. Repair of soft tissue subacromial decompression rotator cuff repair, right shoulder.,SPECIFICATIONS: , The entire operative procedure was done in Inpatient Operating Suite, room #1 at ABCD General Hospital. This was done under a interscalene block anesthetic and subsequent general anesthetic in the modified beachchair position.,HISTORY AND GROSS FINDINGS: ,This is a 54-year-old white female suffering an increasing right shoulder pain for a few months prior to surgical intervention. She had an injury to her right shoulder when she fell off a bike. She was diagnosed preoperatively with a rotated cuff tear.,Intra-articularly besides we noted a large SLAP lesion, superior and posterior to the attachment of the glenoid labrum from approximately 12:30 back to 10:30. This acted as a peel-back type of mechanism and was displaced into the joint beyond the superior rim of the glenoid. This was an obvious avulsion into subchondral bone with bone exposed. The anterior aspect had degenerative changes, but did not have evidence of avulsion. The subscapular was noted to be intact. On the joint side of the supraspinatus, there was noted to be a laminated type of tearing to the rotated cuff to the anterior and mid-aspect of the supraspinatus attachment.,This was confirmed subacromially. The patient had a type-I plus acromion in outlet view and thus it was elected to not perform a subacromial decompression, but soft tissue release of the CA ligament in a releasing resection type fashion.,OPERATIVE PROCEDURE: , The patient was placed supine upon the operative table after she was given interscalene and then general anesthesia by the Anesthesia Department. She was safely placed in a modified beachchair position. She was prepped and draped in the usual sterile manner. The portals were created from outside the ends, posterior to the scope and anteriorly for an intraoperative portal and then laterally. She had at least two other portals appropriate for both repair mechanisms described above.,Attention was then turned to the SLAP lesion. The edges were debrided both on the bony side as well as soft tissue side. We used the anterior portal to lift up the mechanism and created a superolateral portal through the rotator cuff and into the edge of the labrum. Further debridement was carried out here. A drill hole was made just on the articular surface superiorly for a knotless anchor. A pull-through suture of #2 fiber wire was utilized with the ________. This was pulled through. It was tied to the leader suture of the knotless anchor. This was pulled through and one limb of the anchor loop was grabbed and the anchor impacted with a mallet. There was excellent fixation of the superior labrum. It was noted to be solid and intact. The anchor was placed safely in the bone. There was no room for further knotless or other anchors. After probing was carried out, hard copy Polaroid was obtained.,Attention was then turned to the articular side for the rotator cuff. It was debrided. Subchondral debridement was carried out to the tuberosity also. Care was taken to go to the subchondral region but not beyond. The bone was satisfactory.,Scope was then placed in the subacromial region. Gross bursectomy was carried out with in the lateral portal. This was done throughout as well as in the gutters anterolaterally and posteriorly. Debridement was carried out further to the rotator cuff. Two types of fixation were carried out, one with a superolateral portal a drill hole was made and anchor of the _knotless suture placed after PDS leader suture placed with a Caspari punch. There was an excellent reduction of the tear posteriorly and then anteriorly. Tendon to tendon repair was accomplished by placing a fiber wire across the tendon and tying sutured down through the anterolateral portal. This was done with a sliding stitch and then two half stitches. There was excellent reduction of the tear.,Attention was then turned to the CA ligament. It was released along with periosteum and the undersurface of the anterior acromion. The CA ligament was not only released but resected. There was noted to be no evidence of significant spurring with only a mostly type-I acromion. Thus, it was not elected to perform subacromial decompression for bone with soft tissue only. A pain buster catheter was placed separately. It was cut to length. An interrupted #4-0 nylon was utilized for portal closure. A 0.5% Marcaine was instilled subacromially. Adaptic, 4x4s, ABDs, and Elastoplast tape placed for dressing. The patient's arm was placed in a arm sling. She was transferred to PACU in apparent satisfactory condition. Expected surgical prognosis on this patient is fair. ### Response: Orthopedic, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Ruptured distal biceps tendon, right elbow.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Ruptured distal biceps tendon, right elbow.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED: , Repair of distal biceps tendon, right elbow.,PROCEDURE: ,The patient was taken to OR, Room #2 and administered a general anesthetic. The right upper extremity was then prepped and draped in the usual manner. A sterile tourniquet was placed on the proximal aspect of the right upper extremity. The extremity was then elevated and exsanguinated with an Esmarch bandage and tourniquet was inflated to 250 mmHg. Tourniquet time was 74 minutes. A curvilinear incision was made in the antecubital fossa of the right elbow down through the skin. Hemostasis was achieved utilizing electrocautery. Subcutaneous fat was separated and the skin flaps elevated. The _________ was identified. It was incised. The finger was placed approximately up the anterior aspect of the arm and the distal aspect of the biceps tendon was found. There was some serosanguineous fluid from the previous rupture. This area was suctioned clean. The biceps tendon ends were then placed over a sterile tongue blade and were then sharply cut approximately 5 mm to 7 mm from the tip to create a fresh surface. At this point, the #2 fiber wire was then passed through the tendon. Two fiber wires were utilized in a Krackow-type suture. Once this was completed, dissection was taken digitally down into the antecubital fossa in the path where the biceps tendon had been previously. The radial tuberosity was palpated. Just ulnar to this, a curved hemostat was passed through the soft tissues and was used to tent the skin on the radial aspect of the elbow. A skin incision was made over this area. Approximately two inches down to the skin and subcutaneous tissues, the fascia was split and the extensor muscle was also split.,A stat was then attached through the tip of that stat and passed back up through the antecubital fossa. The tails of the fiber wire suture were grasped and pulled down through the second incision. At this point, they were placed to the side. Attention was directed at exposure of the radial tuberosity with a forearm fully pronated. The tuberosity came into view. The margins were cleared with periosteal elevator and sharp dissection. Utilizing the power bur, a trough approximately 1.5 cm wide x 7 mm to 8 mm high was placed in the radial tuberosity. Three small drill holes were then placed along the margin for passage of the suture. The area was then copiously irrigated with gentamicin solution. A #4-0 pullout wire was utilized to pass the sutures through the drill holes, one on each outer hole and two in the center hole. The elbow was flexed and the tendon was then pulled into the trough with the forearm supinated. The suture was tied over the bone islands. Both wounds were then copiously irrigated with gentamicin solution and suctioned dry. Muscle fascia was closed with running #2-0 Vicryl suture on the lateral incision followed by closure of the skin with interrupted #2-0 Vicryl and small staples. The anterior incision was approximated with interrupted #2-0 Vicryl for Subq. and then skin was approximated with small staples. Both wounds were infiltrated with a total of 30 cc of 0.25% Marcaine solution for postop analgesia. A bulky fluff dressing was applied to the elbow, followed by application of a long-arm plaster splint maintaining the forearm in the supinated position. Tourniquet was inflated prior to application of the splint. Circulatory status returned to the extremity immediately. The patient was awakened. He was rather boisterous during his awakening, but care was taken to protect the right upper extremity. He was then transferred to the recovery room in apparent satisfactory condition.

preoperative diagnosis ruptured distal biceps tendon right elbowpostoperative diagnosis ruptured distal biceps tendon right elbowprocedure performed repair distal biceps tendon right elbowprocedure patient taken room administered general anesthetic right upper extremity prepped draped usual manner sterile tourniquet placed proximal aspect right upper extremity extremity elevated exsanguinated esmarch bandage tourniquet inflated mmhg tourniquet time minutes curvilinear incision made antecubital fossa right elbow skin hemostasis achieved utilizing electrocautery subcutaneous fat separated skin flaps elevated _________ identified incised finger placed approximately anterior aspect arm distal aspect biceps tendon found serosanguineous fluid previous rupture area suctioned clean biceps tendon ends placed sterile tongue blade sharply cut approximately mm mm tip create fresh surface point fiber wire passed tendon two fiber wires utilized krackowtype suture completed dissection taken digitally antecubital fossa path biceps tendon previously radial tuberosity palpated ulnar curved hemostat passed soft tissues used tent skin radial aspect elbow skin incision made area approximately two inches skin subcutaneous tissues fascia split extensor muscle also splita stat attached tip stat passed back antecubital fossa tails fiber wire suture grasped pulled second incision point placed side attention directed exposure radial tuberosity forearm fully pronated tuberosity came view margins cleared periosteal elevator sharp dissection utilizing power bur trough approximately cm wide x mm mm high placed radial tuberosity three small drill holes placed along margin passage suture area copiously irrigated gentamicin solution pullout wire utilized pass sutures drill holes one outer hole two center hole elbow flexed tendon pulled trough forearm supinated suture tied bone islands wounds copiously irrigated gentamicin solution suctioned dry muscle fascia closed running vicryl suture lateral incision followed closure skin interrupted vicryl small staples anterior incision approximated interrupted vicryl subq skin approximated small staples wounds infiltrated total cc marcaine solution postop analgesia bulky fluff dressing applied elbow followed application longarm plaster splint maintaining forearm supinated position tourniquet inflated prior application splint circulatory status returned extremity immediately patient awakened rather boisterous awakening care taken protect right upper extremity transferred recovery room apparent satisfactory condition

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Ruptured distal biceps tendon, right elbow.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Ruptured distal biceps tendon, right elbow.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED: , Repair of distal biceps tendon, right elbow.,PROCEDURE: ,The patient was taken to OR, Room #2 and administered a general anesthetic. The right upper extremity was then prepped and draped in the usual manner. A sterile tourniquet was placed on the proximal aspect of the right upper extremity. The extremity was then elevated and exsanguinated with an Esmarch bandage and tourniquet was inflated to 250 mmHg. Tourniquet time was 74 minutes. A curvilinear incision was made in the antecubital fossa of the right elbow down through the skin. Hemostasis was achieved utilizing electrocautery. Subcutaneous fat was separated and the skin flaps elevated. The _________ was identified. It was incised. The finger was placed approximately up the anterior aspect of the arm and the distal aspect of the biceps tendon was found. There was some serosanguineous fluid from the previous rupture. This area was suctioned clean. The biceps tendon ends were then placed over a sterile tongue blade and were then sharply cut approximately 5 mm to 7 mm from the tip to create a fresh surface. At this point, the #2 fiber wire was then passed through the tendon. Two fiber wires were utilized in a Krackow-type suture. Once this was completed, dissection was taken digitally down into the antecubital fossa in the path where the biceps tendon had been previously. The radial tuberosity was palpated. Just ulnar to this, a curved hemostat was passed through the soft tissues and was used to tent the skin on the radial aspect of the elbow. A skin incision was made over this area. Approximately two inches down to the skin and subcutaneous tissues, the fascia was split and the extensor muscle was also split.,A stat was then attached through the tip of that stat and passed back up through the antecubital fossa. The tails of the fiber wire suture were grasped and pulled down through the second incision. At this point, they were placed to the side. Attention was directed at exposure of the radial tuberosity with a forearm fully pronated. The tuberosity came into view. The margins were cleared with periosteal elevator and sharp dissection. Utilizing the power bur, a trough approximately 1.5 cm wide x 7 mm to 8 mm high was placed in the radial tuberosity. Three small drill holes were then placed along the margin for passage of the suture. The area was then copiously irrigated with gentamicin solution. A #4-0 pullout wire was utilized to pass the sutures through the drill holes, one on each outer hole and two in the center hole. The elbow was flexed and the tendon was then pulled into the trough with the forearm supinated. The suture was tied over the bone islands. Both wounds were then copiously irrigated with gentamicin solution and suctioned dry. Muscle fascia was closed with running #2-0 Vicryl suture on the lateral incision followed by closure of the skin with interrupted #2-0 Vicryl and small staples. The anterior incision was approximated with interrupted #2-0 Vicryl for Subq. and then skin was approximated with small staples. Both wounds were infiltrated with a total of 30 cc of 0.25% Marcaine solution for postop analgesia. A bulky fluff dressing was applied to the elbow, followed by application of a long-arm plaster splint maintaining the forearm in the supinated position. Tourniquet was inflated prior to application of the splint. Circulatory status returned to the extremity immediately. The patient was awakened. He was rather boisterous during his awakening, but care was taken to protect the right upper extremity. He was then transferred to the recovery room in apparent satisfactory condition. ### Response: Orthopedic, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Ruptured globe OX.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Ruptured globe OX.,PROCEDURE: , Repair of ruptured globe OX.,ANESTHESIA:, General,SPECIMENS:, None.,COMPLICATIONS: ,None.,INDICATIONS:, This is a XX-year-old (wo)man with a ruptured globe of the XXX eye.,PROCEDURE:, The risks and benefits of eye surgery were discussed at length with the patient, including bleeding, infection, re-operation, loss of vision, and loss of the eye. Informed consent was obtained. The patient received IV antibiotics including Ancef and Levaeuin prior to surgery. The patient was brought to the operating room and placud in the supine position, where (s)he wad prepped and draped in the routine fashion. A wire lid speculum was placed to provide exposure.,Upon examination and dissection of the conjunctiva superiorly, a scleral rupture was found. The rupture extended approximately 15 mm in length superior to the cornea, approximately 2 mm from the limbus in a horizontal fashion. There was also a rupture at the limbus, near the middle of this laceration, causing the anterior chamber to be flat. There was a large blood clot filling the anterior chamber. An attempt was made to wash out the anterior chamber with BSS on a cannula. The BSS was injected through the limbal rupture, which communicated with the anterior chamber. The blood clot did not move. It was extremely adherent to the iris.,At that time, the rupture that involved the limbus from approximately 10:30 until 12 o'clock was closed using 1 suture of 10-0 nylon. The scleral laceration was then closed using 10 interrupted sutures with 9-0 Vicryl. At that time, the anterior chamber was formed and appeared to be fairly deep. The wounds were checked and found to be watertight. The knots were rotated posteriorly and the conjunctiva was draped up over the sutures and sewn into position at the limbus using four 7-0 Vicryl sutures, 2 nasally and 2 temporally. All suture knots were buried. ,Gentamicin 0.5 cc was injected subconjunctivally. Then, the speculum was removed. The drapes were removed. Several drops of Ocuflox and Maxitrol ointment were placed in the XXX eye. An eye patch and shield were placed over the eye. The patient was awakened from general anesthesia without difficulty and taken to the recovery room in good condition.

preoperative diagnosis ruptured globe oxpostoperative diagnosis ruptured globe oxprocedure repair ruptured globe oxanesthesia generalspecimens nonecomplications noneindications xxyearold woman ruptured globe xxx eyeprocedure risks benefits eye surgery discussed length patient including bleeding infection reoperation loss vision loss eye informed consent obtained patient received iv antibiotics including ancef levaeuin prior surgery patient brought operating room placud supine position wad prepped draped routine fashion wire lid speculum placed provide exposureupon examination dissection conjunctiva superiorly scleral rupture found rupture extended approximately mm length superior cornea approximately mm limbus horizontal fashion also rupture limbus near middle laceration causing anterior chamber flat large blood clot filling anterior chamber attempt made wash anterior chamber bss cannula bss injected limbal rupture communicated anterior chamber blood clot move extremely adherent irisat time rupture involved limbus approximately oclock closed using suture nylon scleral laceration closed using interrupted sutures vicryl time anterior chamber formed appeared fairly deep wounds checked found watertight knots rotated posteriorly conjunctiva draped sutures sewn position limbus using four vicryl sutures nasally temporally suture knots buried gentamicin cc injected subconjunctivally speculum removed drapes removed several drops ocuflox maxitrol ointment placed xxx eye eye patch shield placed eye patient awakened general anesthesia without difficulty taken recovery room good condition

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Ruptured globe OX.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Ruptured globe OX.,PROCEDURE: , Repair of ruptured globe OX.,ANESTHESIA:, General,SPECIMENS:, None.,COMPLICATIONS: ,None.,INDICATIONS:, This is a XX-year-old (wo)man with a ruptured globe of the XXX eye.,PROCEDURE:, The risks and benefits of eye surgery were discussed at length with the patient, including bleeding, infection, re-operation, loss of vision, and loss of the eye. Informed consent was obtained. The patient received IV antibiotics including Ancef and Levaeuin prior to surgery. The patient was brought to the operating room and placud in the supine position, where (s)he wad prepped and draped in the routine fashion. A wire lid speculum was placed to provide exposure.,Upon examination and dissection of the conjunctiva superiorly, a scleral rupture was found. The rupture extended approximately 15 mm in length superior to the cornea, approximately 2 mm from the limbus in a horizontal fashion. There was also a rupture at the limbus, near the middle of this laceration, causing the anterior chamber to be flat. There was a large blood clot filling the anterior chamber. An attempt was made to wash out the anterior chamber with BSS on a cannula. The BSS was injected through the limbal rupture, which communicated with the anterior chamber. The blood clot did not move. It was extremely adherent to the iris.,At that time, the rupture that involved the limbus from approximately 10:30 until 12 o'clock was closed using 1 suture of 10-0 nylon. The scleral laceration was then closed using 10 interrupted sutures with 9-0 Vicryl. At that time, the anterior chamber was formed and appeared to be fairly deep. The wounds were checked and found to be watertight. The knots were rotated posteriorly and the conjunctiva was draped up over the sutures and sewn into position at the limbus using four 7-0 Vicryl sutures, 2 nasally and 2 temporally. All suture knots were buried. ,Gentamicin 0.5 cc was injected subconjunctivally. Then, the speculum was removed. The drapes were removed. Several drops of Ocuflox and Maxitrol ointment were placed in the XXX eye. An eye patch and shield were placed over the eye. The patient was awakened from general anesthesia without difficulty and taken to the recovery room in good condition. ### Response: Ophthalmology, Surgery

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Ruptured globe with uveal prolapse OX.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Ruptured globe with uveal prolapse OX.,PROCEDURE: ,Repair of ruptured globe with repositing of uveal tissue OX.,ANESTHESIA: ,General,SPECIMENS:, None.,COMPLICATIONS:, None.,INDICATIONS: , This is a XX-year-old (wo)man with a ruptured globe of the XXX eye.,PROCEDURE: , The risks and benefits of eye surgery were discussed at length with the patient, including bleeding, infection, re-operation, loss of vision, and loss of the eye. Informed consent was obtained. The patient received IV antibiotics including Ancef and Levaeuin prior to surgery. The patient was brought to the operating room and placud in the supine position, where (s)he wad prepped and draped in the routine fashion. A wire lid speculum was carefully placed to provide exposure. A two-armed 7 mm scleral laceration was seen in the supranasal quadrant. The laceration involved the sclera and the limbus in this area. There was a small amount of iris tissue prolapsed in the wound. The Westcott scissors and 0.12 forceps were used to carefully dissect the conjunctiva away from the wound to provide exposure. A cyclodialysis spatula was used to carefully reposit the prolapsed iris tissue back into the anterior chamber. The anterior chamber remained formed and the iris tissue easily resumed its normal position. The pupil appeared round. An 8-0 nylon suture was used to close the scleral portion of the laceration. Three sutures were placed using the 8-0 nylon suture. Then 9-0 nylon suture was used to close the limbal portion of the wound. After the wound appeared closed, a Superblade was used to create a paracentesis at approximately 2 o'clock. BSS was injected through the paracentesis to fill the anterior chamber. The wound was checked and found to be watertight. No leaks were observed. An 8-0 Vicryl suture was used to reposition the conjunctiva and close the wound. Three 8-0 Vicryl sutures were placed in the conjunctiva. All scleral sutures were completely covered. The anterior chamber remained formed and the pupil remained round and appeared so at the end of the case. Subconjunctival injections of Ancef and dexamethasone were given at the end of the case as well as Tobradex ointment. The lid speculum was carefully removed. The drapes were carefully removed. Sterile saline was used to clean around the XXX eye as well as the rest of the face. The area was carefully dried and an eye patch and shield were taped over the XXX eye. The patient was awakened from general anesthesia without difficulty. (S)he was taken to the recovery area in good condition. There were no complications.