Datasets:

Erland

/

NLP701_Assignment2_Subtask3_KTO_Dataset_2

like 0

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Russia has a clear plan to resolve the conflict in Ukraine The conflict in Ukraine may end either by diplomatic or military means. However, it can be possible only after Moscow achieves its goals. "An opportunity to resolve the conflict will appear only when Ukraine ceases to pose a threat to Russia and discriminate against Russian-speaking Ukrainians,” Vasily Nebenzya, Russia's Ambassador to the UN Security Council, said at a briefing at the UN Security Council. "If this result can be achieved through negotiations, we are ready for such a scenario. If not, then our objectives will be achieved by military means," he added. Russia is not fighting against the Ukrainian people. Russia is fighting against the criminal nationalist regime that came to power in 2014” after the coup in Kyiv, the diplomat said. "The new Ukrainian leadership is trying to purge the country of everything connected with Russia and glorify Nazi accomplices. <…> "The Kyiv regime and its most rabid patrons have forgotten the meaning of the word "peace." It is no coincidence that the European Union finances arms supplies to Kyiv through the European Peace Fund, without even thinking about how blasphemous it sounds and looks. <…> "Ukraine, in fact, has become a NATO PMC. It gets money, weapons and intelligence data. Ukraine receives instructions which targets to attack and where. It is the Ukrainian people who suffer from this in the first place and the people of Ukraine are forced to fight for the sake of someone else's tasks." However, the Russian Ambassador to the UN said, everything could have ended differently for Ukraine, if Kyiv had implemented the now-defunct Minsk Agreements that were signed in 2014 and 2015 "in an attempt to pave the way for peace by granting the Donetsk and Luhansk People's Republics a special status as part of the Ukrainian state". Former Chancellor of Germany Angela Merkel and ex-president of France Francois Hollande later confirmed that neither sitting President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky, nor his predecessors, nor France and Germany, who were involved in the Minks Agreements process, never intended to fulfil them. This diplomatic process served only as a "smoke screen" behind which they secretly armed Ukraine against Russia. Merkel's and Hollande's confessions caused an uproar in Moscow. Russian officials called them a formalisation of betrayal. Interestingly, though, no one in the West was embarrassed about those statements. It appears that the West continues implementing its strategy. In December, Ukraine put forward the idea of the Global Peace Summit based on Zelensky's "peace formula." In that formula, among other things, Zelensky demanded Russia should withdraw its troops from all Ukrainian territories. Moscow dismissed the plan as it ignored the new status of Donetsk and Luhansk People's Republics, Kherson, Zaporozhye (Zaporizhzhia) regions and Crimea as part of Russia. Now Kyiv has a new "idea": The Ukrainian administration wants to hold a "peace summit" at UN headquarters in New York on February 24 (one year anniversary since the start of the special operation), but without Moscow's participation. According to The Associated Press, Ukrainian President Zelenskiy was planning to visit New York in February to address a high-level meeting of the 193-member General Assembly on the eve of the first anniversary of Russia's February 24 invasion of Ukraine. Ukraine would like the UN General Assembly to adopt two resolutions: "Peace talks could start after the UN General Assembly passes the resolutions or after the proposed summit is held," Ukraine's Deputy Foreign Minister Emine Dzhaparova said. Subscribe to Pravda.Ru Telegram channel, Facebook, RSS! The fighting in several directions in the Kursk region continues. According to the Russian side, the Ukrainian Armed Forces are redeploying to attack in a new area </document> <category> URW: Discrediting Ukraine </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Several paragraphs of the text convey a narrative discreting Ukraine by underlining its weakness, while also highlighting its internal instability and the fact that Western allies don't support it. Ukraine is depicted as being manipulated by Western countries in order to fight Russia.

EN_UA_011260.txt

URW: Discrediting Ukraine

none

Throughout all the text, Ukraine is discredited as threatening Russian-speaking population, having a criminal government, and implement ethnic cleansing in its territories. This is accomplished through the use of one-sided reporting that gradually takes opinion form accusing Ukraine and Western allies of being the aggressors.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Russia has a clear plan to resolve the conflict in Ukraine The conflict in Ukraine may end either by diplomatic or military means. However, it can be possible only after Moscow achieves its goals. "An opportunity to resolve the conflict will appear only when Ukraine ceases to pose a threat to Russia and discriminate against Russian-speaking Ukrainians,” Vasily Nebenzya, Russia's Ambassador to the UN Security Council, said at a briefing at the UN Security Council. "If this result can be achieved through negotiations, we are ready for such a scenario. If not, then our objectives will be achieved by military means," he added. Russia is not fighting against the Ukrainian people. Russia is fighting against the criminal nationalist regime that came to power in 2014” after the coup in Kyiv, the diplomat said. "The new Ukrainian leadership is trying to purge the country of everything connected with Russia and glorify Nazi accomplices. <…> "The Kyiv regime and its most rabid patrons have forgotten the meaning of the word "peace." It is no coincidence that the European Union finances arms supplies to Kyiv through the European Peace Fund, without even thinking about how blasphemous it sounds and looks. <…> "Ukraine, in fact, has become a NATO PMC. It gets money, weapons and intelligence data. Ukraine receives instructions which targets to attack and where. It is the Ukrainian people who suffer from this in the first place and the people of Ukraine are forced to fight for the sake of someone else's tasks." However, the Russian Ambassador to the UN said, everything could have ended differently for Ukraine, if Kyiv had implemented the now-defunct Minsk Agreements that were signed in 2014 and 2015 "in an attempt to pave the way for peace by granting the Donetsk and Luhansk People's Republics a special status as part of the Ukrainian state". Former Chancellor of Germany Angela Merkel and ex-president of France Francois Hollande later confirmed that neither sitting President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky, nor his predecessors, nor France and Germany, who were involved in the Minks Agreements process, never intended to fulfil them. This diplomatic process served only as a "smoke screen" behind which they secretly armed Ukraine against Russia. Merkel's and Hollande's confessions caused an uproar in Moscow. Russian officials called them a formalisation of betrayal. Interestingly, though, no one in the West was embarrassed about those statements. It appears that the West continues implementing its strategy. In December, Ukraine put forward the idea of the Global Peace Summit based on Zelensky's "peace formula." In that formula, among other things, Zelensky demanded Russia should withdraw its troops from all Ukrainian territories. Moscow dismissed the plan as it ignored the new status of Donetsk and Luhansk People's Republics, Kherson, Zaporozhye (Zaporizhzhia) regions and Crimea as part of Russia. Now Kyiv has a new "idea": The Ukrainian administration wants to hold a "peace summit" at UN headquarters in New York on February 24 (one year anniversary since the start of the special operation), but without Moscow's participation. According to The Associated Press, Ukrainian President Zelenskiy was planning to visit New York in February to address a high-level meeting of the 193-member General Assembly on the eve of the first anniversary of Russia's February 24 invasion of Ukraine. Ukraine would like the UN General Assembly to adopt two resolutions: "Peace talks could start after the UN General Assembly passes the resolutions or after the proposed summit is held," Ukraine's Deputy Foreign Minister Emine Dzhaparova said. Subscribe to Pravda.Ru Telegram channel, Facebook, RSS! The fighting in several directions in the Kursk region continues. According to the Russian side, the Ukrainian Armed Forces are redeploying to attack in a new area </document> <category> URW: Discrediting Ukraine </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Several paragraphs highlight how Ukraine is trying to negociate with the West in order to arm against Russia. Russia wants to achieve its goals by military means.

EN_UA_011260.txt

URW: Discrediting Ukraine

none

Throughout all the text, Ukraine is discredited as threatening Russian-speaking population, having a criminal government, and implement ethnic cleansing in its territories. This is accomplished through the use of one-sided reporting that gradually takes opinion form accusing Ukraine and Western allies of being the aggressors.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Russia has a clear plan to resolve the conflict in Ukraine The conflict in Ukraine may end either by diplomatic or military means. However, it can be possible only after Moscow achieves its goals. "An opportunity to resolve the conflict will appear only when Ukraine ceases to pose a threat to Russia and discriminate against Russian-speaking Ukrainians,” Vasily Nebenzya, Russia's Ambassador to the UN Security Council, said at a briefing at the UN Security Council. "If this result can be achieved through negotiations, we are ready for such a scenario. If not, then our objectives will be achieved by military means," he added. Russia is not fighting against the Ukrainian people. Russia is fighting against the criminal nationalist regime that came to power in 2014” after the coup in Kyiv, the diplomat said. "The new Ukrainian leadership is trying to purge the country of everything connected with Russia and glorify Nazi accomplices. <…> "The Kyiv regime and its most rabid patrons have forgotten the meaning of the word "peace." It is no coincidence that the European Union finances arms supplies to Kyiv through the European Peace Fund, without even thinking about how blasphemous it sounds and looks. <…> "Ukraine, in fact, has become a NATO PMC. It gets money, weapons and intelligence data. Ukraine receives instructions which targets to attack and where. It is the Ukrainian people who suffer from this in the first place and the people of Ukraine are forced to fight for the sake of someone else's tasks." However, the Russian Ambassador to the UN said, everything could have ended differently for Ukraine, if Kyiv had implemented the now-defunct Minsk Agreements that were signed in 2014 and 2015 "in an attempt to pave the way for peace by granting the Donetsk and Luhansk People's Republics a special status as part of the Ukrainian state". Former Chancellor of Germany Angela Merkel and ex-president of France Francois Hollande later confirmed that neither sitting President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky, nor his predecessors, nor France and Germany, who were involved in the Minks Agreements process, never intended to fulfil them. This diplomatic process served only as a "smoke screen" behind which they secretly armed Ukraine against Russia. Merkel's and Hollande's confessions caused an uproar in Moscow. Russian officials called them a formalisation of betrayal. Interestingly, though, no one in the West was embarrassed about those statements. It appears that the West continues implementing its strategy. In December, Ukraine put forward the idea of the Global Peace Summit based on Zelensky's "peace formula." In that formula, among other things, Zelensky demanded Russia should withdraw its troops from all Ukrainian territories. Moscow dismissed the plan as it ignored the new status of Donetsk and Luhansk People's Republics, Kherson, Zaporozhye (Zaporizhzhia) regions and Crimea as part of Russia. Now Kyiv has a new "idea": The Ukrainian administration wants to hold a "peace summit" at UN headquarters in New York on February 24 (one year anniversary since the start of the special operation), but without Moscow's participation. According to The Associated Press, Ukrainian President Zelenskiy was planning to visit New York in February to address a high-level meeting of the 193-member General Assembly on the eve of the first anniversary of Russia's February 24 invasion of Ukraine. Ukraine would like the UN General Assembly to adopt two resolutions: "Peace talks could start after the UN General Assembly passes the resolutions or after the proposed summit is held," Ukraine's Deputy Foreign Minister Emine Dzhaparova said. Subscribe to Pravda.Ru Telegram channel, Facebook, RSS! The fighting in several directions in the Kursk region continues. According to the Russian side, the Ukrainian Armed Forces are redeploying to attack in a new area </document> <category> URW: Discrediting Ukraine </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text has multiple paragraphs depicting Ukraine as the aggressor, mentioning the killing of civilians and indiscriminate use of weapons.

EN_UA_011260.txt

URW: Discrediting Ukraine

none

Throughout all the text, Ukraine is discredited as threatening Russian-speaking population, having a criminal government, and implement ethnic cleansing in its territories. This is accomplished through the use of one-sided reporting that gradually takes opinion form accusing Ukraine and Western allies of being the aggressors.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Russia has a clear plan to resolve the conflict in Ukraine The conflict in Ukraine may end either by diplomatic or military means. However, it can be possible only after Moscow achieves its goals. "An opportunity to resolve the conflict will appear only when Ukraine ceases to pose a threat to Russia and discriminate against Russian-speaking Ukrainians,” Vasily Nebenzya, Russia's Ambassador to the UN Security Council, said at a briefing at the UN Security Council. "If this result can be achieved through negotiations, we are ready for such a scenario. If not, then our objectives will be achieved by military means," he added. Russia is not fighting against the Ukrainian people. Russia is fighting against the criminal nationalist regime that came to power in 2014” after the coup in Kyiv, the diplomat said. "The new Ukrainian leadership is trying to purge the country of everything connected with Russia and glorify Nazi accomplices. <…> "The Kyiv regime and its most rabid patrons have forgotten the meaning of the word "peace." It is no coincidence that the European Union finances arms supplies to Kyiv through the European Peace Fund, without even thinking about how blasphemous it sounds and looks. <…> "Ukraine, in fact, has become a NATO PMC. It gets money, weapons and intelligence data. Ukraine receives instructions which targets to attack and where. It is the Ukrainian people who suffer from this in the first place and the people of Ukraine are forced to fight for the sake of someone else's tasks." However, the Russian Ambassador to the UN said, everything could have ended differently for Ukraine, if Kyiv had implemented the now-defunct Minsk Agreements that were signed in 2014 and 2015 "in an attempt to pave the way for peace by granting the Donetsk and Luhansk People's Republics a special status as part of the Ukrainian state". Former Chancellor of Germany Angela Merkel and ex-president of France Francois Hollande later confirmed that neither sitting President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky, nor his predecessors, nor France and Germany, who were involved in the Minks Agreements process, never intended to fulfil them. This diplomatic process served only as a "smoke screen" behind which they secretly armed Ukraine against Russia. Merkel's and Hollande's confessions caused an uproar in Moscow. Russian officials called them a formalisation of betrayal. Interestingly, though, no one in the West was embarrassed about those statements. It appears that the West continues implementing its strategy. In December, Ukraine put forward the idea of the Global Peace Summit based on Zelensky's "peace formula." In that formula, among other things, Zelensky demanded Russia should withdraw its troops from all Ukrainian territories. Moscow dismissed the plan as it ignored the new status of Donetsk and Luhansk People's Republics, Kherson, Zaporozhye (Zaporizhzhia) regions and Crimea as part of Russia. Now Kyiv has a new "idea": The Ukrainian administration wants to hold a "peace summit" at UN headquarters in New York on February 24 (one year anniversary since the start of the special operation), but without Moscow's participation. According to The Associated Press, Ukrainian President Zelenskiy was planning to visit New York in February to address a high-level meeting of the 193-member General Assembly on the eve of the first anniversary of Russia's February 24 invasion of Ukraine. Ukraine would like the UN General Assembly to adopt two resolutions: "Peace talks could start after the UN General Assembly passes the resolutions or after the proposed summit is held," Ukraine's Deputy Foreign Minister Emine Dzhaparova said. Subscribe to Pravda.Ru Telegram channel, Facebook, RSS! The fighting in several directions in the Kursk region continues. According to the Russian side, the Ukrainian Armed Forces are redeploying to attack in a new area </document> <category> URW: Discrediting Ukraine </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Several paragraphs present alleged failures of the Ukrainian military and its government. Ukraine is discredited as well as Western allies of Ukraine.

EN_UA_011260.txt

URW: Discrediting Ukraine

none

Throughout all the text, Ukraine is discredited as threatening Russian-speaking population, having a criminal government, and implement ethnic cleansing in its territories. This is accomplished through the use of one-sided reporting that gradually takes opinion form accusing Ukraine and Western allies of being the aggressors.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Russia has a clear plan to resolve the conflict in Ukraine The conflict in Ukraine may end either by diplomatic or military means. However, it can be possible only after Moscow achieves its goals. "An opportunity to resolve the conflict will appear only when Ukraine ceases to pose a threat to Russia and discriminate against Russian-speaking Ukrainians,” Vasily Nebenzya, Russia's Ambassador to the UN Security Council, said at a briefing at the UN Security Council. "If this result can be achieved through negotiations, we are ready for such a scenario. If not, then our objectives will be achieved by military means," he added. Russia is not fighting against the Ukrainian people. Russia is fighting against the criminal nationalist regime that came to power in 2014” after the coup in Kyiv, the diplomat said. "The new Ukrainian leadership is trying to purge the country of everything connected with Russia and glorify Nazi accomplices. <…> "The Kyiv regime and its most rabid patrons have forgotten the meaning of the word "peace." It is no coincidence that the European Union finances arms supplies to Kyiv through the European Peace Fund, without even thinking about how blasphemous it sounds and looks. <…> "Ukraine, in fact, has become a NATO PMC. It gets money, weapons and intelligence data. Ukraine receives instructions which targets to attack and where. It is the Ukrainian people who suffer from this in the first place and the people of Ukraine are forced to fight for the sake of someone else's tasks." However, the Russian Ambassador to the UN said, everything could have ended differently for Ukraine, if Kyiv had implemented the now-defunct Minsk Agreements that were signed in 2014 and 2015 "in an attempt to pave the way for peace by granting the Donetsk and Luhansk People's Republics a special status as part of the Ukrainian state". Former Chancellor of Germany Angela Merkel and ex-president of France Francois Hollande later confirmed that neither sitting President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky, nor his predecessors, nor France and Germany, who were involved in the Minks Agreements process, never intended to fulfil them. This diplomatic process served only as a "smoke screen" behind which they secretly armed Ukraine against Russia. Merkel's and Hollande's confessions caused an uproar in Moscow. Russian officials called them a formalisation of betrayal. Interestingly, though, no one in the West was embarrassed about those statements. It appears that the West continues implementing its strategy. In December, Ukraine put forward the idea of the Global Peace Summit based on Zelensky's "peace formula." In that formula, among other things, Zelensky demanded Russia should withdraw its troops from all Ukrainian territories. Moscow dismissed the plan as it ignored the new status of Donetsk and Luhansk People's Republics, Kherson, Zaporozhye (Zaporizhzhia) regions and Crimea as part of Russia. Now Kyiv has a new "idea": The Ukrainian administration wants to hold a "peace summit" at UN headquarters in New York on February 24 (one year anniversary since the start of the special operation), but without Moscow's participation. According to The Associated Press, Ukrainian President Zelenskiy was planning to visit New York in February to address a high-level meeting of the 193-member General Assembly on the eve of the first anniversary of Russia's February 24 invasion of Ukraine. Ukraine would like the UN General Assembly to adopt two resolutions: "Peace talks could start after the UN General Assembly passes the resolutions or after the proposed summit is held," Ukraine's Deputy Foreign Minister Emine Dzhaparova said. Subscribe to Pravda.Ru Telegram channel, Facebook, RSS! The fighting in several directions in the Kursk region continues. According to the Russian side, the Ukrainian Armed Forces are redeploying to attack in a new area </document> <category> URW: Discrediting Ukraine </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The author says that Ukraine is a proxy of the West in its conflict with Russia. This allows them to supply arms and intelligence data to attack Russia and persecute Russian speaking Ukrainians.

EN_UA_011260.txt

URW: Discrediting Ukraine

none

Throughout all the text, Ukraine is discredited as threatening Russian-speaking population, having a criminal government, and implement ethnic cleansing in its territories. This is accomplished through the use of one-sided reporting that gradually takes opinion form accusing Ukraine and Western allies of being the aggressors.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Glaciers Give the Lie to Global Warming Narrative Glaciers Give the Lie to Global Warming Narrative According to the Gospel of the Global Warming Hoax, 1850–1910 was the coldest period of the past millennium. Yet glaciers were retreating rapidly. Now that the planet allegedly has a fever, the retreat has slowed dramatically and even reversed: Our moonbat rulers canceled the Medieval Warm Period and Little Ice Age for failing to comply with climate ideology. But preventing glaciers from growing is more difficult than doctoring the historical record to support climate con man Michael Mann’s spurious hockey stick graph. Nonetheless, prophet of doom Al Gore shouts that “we could lose our capacity for self-governance” if we don’t surrender still more freedom to Big Government so that it can fix the supposedly broken weather. On tips from Lyle and Wiggins. Anyone can join. Anyone can contribute. Anyone can become informed about their world. </document> <category> CC: Downplaying climate change: Ice is not melting </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The author says that glaciers are not melting as fast as the climate movement claims. The article quotes studies and alleged evidence to support their claims.

EN_CC_100124.txt

CC: Downplaying climate change

CC: Downplaying climate change: Ice is not melting

The text conveys a narrative claiming that glaciers are not melting. In doing so, they present alleged evidence discrediting climate movement, labeling some prominent figures as alarmist and being in bad faith

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Glaciers Give the Lie to Global Warming Narrative Glaciers Give the Lie to Global Warming Narrative According to the Gospel of the Global Warming Hoax, 1850–1910 was the coldest period of the past millennium. Yet glaciers were retreating rapidly. Now that the planet allegedly has a fever, the retreat has slowed dramatically and even reversed: Our moonbat rulers canceled the Medieval Warm Period and Little Ice Age for failing to comply with climate ideology. But preventing glaciers from growing is more difficult than doctoring the historical record to support climate con man Michael Mann’s spurious hockey stick graph. Nonetheless, prophet of doom Al Gore shouts that “we could lose our capacity for self-governance” if we don’t surrender still more freedom to Big Government so that it can fix the supposedly broken weather. On tips from Lyle and Wiggins. Anyone can join. Anyone can contribute. Anyone can become informed about their world. </document> <category> CC: Downplaying climate change: Ice is not melting </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text claims that glaciers are not melting despite higher temperatures. Several paragraphs convey a sense of alarm due to alleged negative consequences of climate change

EN_CC_100124.txt

CC: Downplaying climate change

CC: Downplaying climate change: Ice is not melting

The text conveys a narrative claiming that glaciers are not melting. In doing so, they present alleged evidence discrediting climate movement, labeling some prominent figures as alarmist and being in bad faith

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Glaciers Give the Lie to Global Warming Narrative Glaciers Give the Lie to Global Warming Narrative According to the Gospel of the Global Warming Hoax, 1850–1910 was the coldest period of the past millennium. Yet glaciers were retreating rapidly. Now that the planet allegedly has a fever, the retreat has slowed dramatically and even reversed: Our moonbat rulers canceled the Medieval Warm Period and Little Ice Age for failing to comply with climate ideology. But preventing glaciers from growing is more difficult than doctoring the historical record to support climate con man Michael Mann’s spurious hockey stick graph. Nonetheless, prophet of doom Al Gore shouts that “we could lose our capacity for self-governance” if we don’t surrender still more freedom to Big Government so that it can fix the supposedly broken weather. On tips from Lyle and Wiggins. Anyone can join. Anyone can contribute. Anyone can become informed about their world. </document> <category> CC: Downplaying climate change: Ice is not melting </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text questions the evidence for climate change since it says that glaciers have not melted as much as they should have according to climate propaganda.

EN_CC_100124.txt

CC: Downplaying climate change

CC: Downplaying climate change: Ice is not melting

The text conveys a narrative claiming that glaciers are not melting. In doing so, they present alleged evidence discrediting climate movement, labeling some prominent figures as alarmist and being in bad faith

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Glaciers Give the Lie to Global Warming Narrative Glaciers Give the Lie to Global Warming Narrative According to the Gospel of the Global Warming Hoax, 1850–1910 was the coldest period of the past millennium. Yet glaciers were retreating rapidly. Now that the planet allegedly has a fever, the retreat has slowed dramatically and even reversed: Our moonbat rulers canceled the Medieval Warm Period and Little Ice Age for failing to comply with climate ideology. But preventing glaciers from growing is more difficult than doctoring the historical record to support climate con man Michael Mann’s spurious hockey stick graph. Nonetheless, prophet of doom Al Gore shouts that “we could lose our capacity for self-governance” if we don’t surrender still more freedom to Big Government so that it can fix the supposedly broken weather. On tips from Lyle and Wiggins. Anyone can join. Anyone can contribute. Anyone can become informed about their world. </document> <category> CC: Downplaying climate change: Ice is not melting </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text claims that the ice is not melting since it grew in the past despite the fact the earth had higher temperatures than nowadays

EN_CC_100124.txt

CC: Downplaying climate change

CC: Downplaying climate change: Ice is not melting

The text conveys a narrative claiming that glaciers are not melting. In doing so, they present alleged evidence discrediting climate movement, labeling some prominent figures as alarmist and being in bad faith

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Glaciers Give the Lie to Global Warming Narrative Glaciers Give the Lie to Global Warming Narrative According to the Gospel of the Global Warming Hoax, 1850–1910 was the coldest period of the past millennium. Yet glaciers were retreating rapidly. Now that the planet allegedly has a fever, the retreat has slowed dramatically and even reversed: Our moonbat rulers canceled the Medieval Warm Period and Little Ice Age for failing to comply with climate ideology. But preventing glaciers from growing is more difficult than doctoring the historical record to support climate con man Michael Mann’s spurious hockey stick graph. Nonetheless, prophet of doom Al Gore shouts that “we could lose our capacity for self-governance” if we don’t surrender still more freedom to Big Government so that it can fix the supposedly broken weather. On tips from Lyle and Wiggins. Anyone can join. Anyone can contribute. Anyone can become informed about their world. </document> <category> CC: Downplaying climate change: Ice is not melting </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The author argues that glaciers are not melting faster than usual since the mid-twentieth century due to the so-called global warming.

EN_CC_100124.txt

CC: Downplaying climate change

CC: Downplaying climate change: Ice is not melting

The text conveys a narrative claiming that glaciers are not melting. In doing so, they present alleged evidence discrediting climate movement, labeling some prominent figures as alarmist and being in bad faith

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Oxford Residents Mount Resistance Against the Sectioning of Their Streets OXFORD RESIDENTS MOUNT RESISTANCE AGAINST THE SECTIONING OF THEIR STREETS THE GREAT CLIMATE CON Oxford residents are taking matters into their own hands and destroying the street zone sectioning barriers. Oxford is going to be the centre of the resistance to the climate change madness in the UK. . Just recently there was a day of action by activists to kick start the year of fighting back. We predicted the UK was just getting started with their resistance, and here we have it. Taking matters into their own hands, Oxford residents are destroying street zoning barriers. Now that’s quite beautiful to see. Further action There are further planned dates for activists to take to the streets in various forms of protest. Piers Corbyn and friends are taking to the streets on Friday the 13th of January., Starting at Southwark tube in London. Then an event which has potential to draw a large crowd with reports coming in people are making the trip down from as far as Manchester is taking place in Oxford on the 18th of February. It’s very inspiring to see the people of the UK take matters into their own hands. This year is looking to be jam packed with resistance to The Climate Con. Continued coverage will be given on our website, newsletter and social media. Stay tuned for a disobedient 2023. If you want to support the fight against The Climate Con, paid members get access to the 2nd part of The Climate Con Podcast. Or you can make a donation here. The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB) Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning. say no to all the tyrants do not let the fachist illuminati force human beings being forced into 15 minute prison cities which is a crime against humanity for a climate change scam this cabal invented to inslave us all. </document> <category> CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of national governments </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Article suggesting the UK government is operating against the interests of its people by enforcing climate change measures.

EN_CC_100002.txt

CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities

CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of national governments

The article talks about the resistance movement against Climate Con Programme initiated by the UK government. The article does not really specify what the residents are specifically resisting, as the article does not give insights into this programme.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Oxford Residents Mount Resistance Against the Sectioning of Their Streets OXFORD RESIDENTS MOUNT RESISTANCE AGAINST THE SECTIONING OF THEIR STREETS THE GREAT CLIMATE CON Oxford residents are taking matters into their own hands and destroying the street zone sectioning barriers. Oxford is going to be the centre of the resistance to the climate change madness in the UK. . Just recently there was a day of action by activists to kick start the year of fighting back. We predicted the UK was just getting started with their resistance, and here we have it. Taking matters into their own hands, Oxford residents are destroying street zoning barriers. Now that’s quite beautiful to see. Further action There are further planned dates for activists to take to the streets in various forms of protest. Piers Corbyn and friends are taking to the streets on Friday the 13th of January., Starting at Southwark tube in London. Then an event which has potential to draw a large crowd with reports coming in people are making the trip down from as far as Manchester is taking place in Oxford on the 18th of February. It’s very inspiring to see the people of the UK take matters into their own hands. This year is looking to be jam packed with resistance to The Climate Con. Continued coverage will be given on our website, newsletter and social media. Stay tuned for a disobedient 2023. If you want to support the fight against The Climate Con, paid members get access to the 2nd part of The Climate Con Podcast. Or you can make a donation here. The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB) Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning. say no to all the tyrants do not let the fachist illuminati force human beings being forced into 15 minute prison cities which is a crime against humanity for a climate change scam this cabal invented to inslave us all. </document> <category> CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of national governments </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Article about UK citizens destroying climate change related infrastructure, depicting the UK government as being corrupt and incompetent

EN_CC_100002.txt

CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities

CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of national governments

The article talks about the resistance movement against Climate Con Programme initiated by the UK government. The article does not really specify what the residents are specifically resisting, as the article does not give insights into this programme.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Oxford Residents Mount Resistance Against the Sectioning of Their Streets OXFORD RESIDENTS MOUNT RESISTANCE AGAINST THE SECTIONING OF THEIR STREETS THE GREAT CLIMATE CON Oxford residents are taking matters into their own hands and destroying the street zone sectioning barriers. Oxford is going to be the centre of the resistance to the climate change madness in the UK. . Just recently there was a day of action by activists to kick start the year of fighting back. We predicted the UK was just getting started with their resistance, and here we have it. Taking matters into their own hands, Oxford residents are destroying street zoning barriers. Now that’s quite beautiful to see. Further action There are further planned dates for activists to take to the streets in various forms of protest. Piers Corbyn and friends are taking to the streets on Friday the 13th of January., Starting at Southwark tube in London. Then an event which has potential to draw a large crowd with reports coming in people are making the trip down from as far as Manchester is taking place in Oxford on the 18th of February. It’s very inspiring to see the people of the UK take matters into their own hands. This year is looking to be jam packed with resistance to The Climate Con. Continued coverage will be given on our website, newsletter and social media. Stay tuned for a disobedient 2023. If you want to support the fight against The Climate Con, paid members get access to the 2nd part of The Climate Con Podcast. Or you can make a donation here. The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB) Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning. say no to all the tyrants do not let the fachist illuminati force human beings being forced into 15 minute prison cities which is a crime against humanity for a climate change scam this cabal invented to inslave us all. </document> <category> CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of national governments </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Article talks about residents of the UK destroying street barriers that were put up by the government to regulate the flow of traffic, arguing that this regulation is against the people's freedom and will lead to slavery.

EN_CC_100002.txt

CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities

CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of national governments

The article talks about the resistance movement against Climate Con Programme initiated by the UK government. The article does not really specify what the residents are specifically resisting, as the article does not give insights into this programme.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Oxford Residents Mount Resistance Against the Sectioning of Their Streets OXFORD RESIDENTS MOUNT RESISTANCE AGAINST THE SECTIONING OF THEIR STREETS THE GREAT CLIMATE CON Oxford residents are taking matters into their own hands and destroying the street zone sectioning barriers. Oxford is going to be the centre of the resistance to the climate change madness in the UK. . Just recently there was a day of action by activists to kick start the year of fighting back. We predicted the UK was just getting started with their resistance, and here we have it. Taking matters into their own hands, Oxford residents are destroying street zoning barriers. Now that’s quite beautiful to see. Further action There are further planned dates for activists to take to the streets in various forms of protest. Piers Corbyn and friends are taking to the streets on Friday the 13th of January., Starting at Southwark tube in London. Then an event which has potential to draw a large crowd with reports coming in people are making the trip down from as far as Manchester is taking place in Oxford on the 18th of February. It’s very inspiring to see the people of the UK take matters into their own hands. This year is looking to be jam packed with resistance to The Climate Con. Continued coverage will be given on our website, newsletter and social media. Stay tuned for a disobedient 2023. If you want to support the fight against The Climate Con, paid members get access to the 2nd part of The Climate Con Podcast. Or you can make a donation here. The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB) Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning. say no to all the tyrants do not let the fachist illuminati force human beings being forced into 15 minute prison cities which is a crime against humanity for a climate change scam this cabal invented to inslave us all. </document> <category> CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of national governments </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Article criticises the UK government for promoting the Climate Con through zoning the city of Oxford. The writer urges people to rise up and fight back, encouraging them to participate in anti-government protests.

EN_CC_100002.txt

CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities

CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of national governments

The article talks about the resistance movement against Climate Con Programme initiated by the UK government. The article does not really specify what the residents are specifically resisting, as the article does not give insights into this programme.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Oxford Residents Mount Resistance Against the Sectioning of Their Streets OXFORD RESIDENTS MOUNT RESISTANCE AGAINST THE SECTIONING OF THEIR STREETS THE GREAT CLIMATE CON Oxford residents are taking matters into their own hands and destroying the street zone sectioning barriers. Oxford is going to be the centre of the resistance to the climate change madness in the UK. . Just recently there was a day of action by activists to kick start the year of fighting back. We predicted the UK was just getting started with their resistance, and here we have it. Taking matters into their own hands, Oxford residents are destroying street zoning barriers. Now that’s quite beautiful to see. Further action There are further planned dates for activists to take to the streets in various forms of protest. Piers Corbyn and friends are taking to the streets on Friday the 13th of January., Starting at Southwark tube in London. Then an event which has potential to draw a large crowd with reports coming in people are making the trip down from as far as Manchester is taking place in Oxford on the 18th of February. It’s very inspiring to see the people of the UK take matters into their own hands. This year is looking to be jam packed with resistance to The Climate Con. Continued coverage will be given on our website, newsletter and social media. Stay tuned for a disobedient 2023. If you want to support the fight against The Climate Con, paid members get access to the 2nd part of The Climate Con Podcast. Or you can make a donation here. The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB) Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning. say no to all the tyrants do not let the fachist illuminati force human beings being forced into 15 minute prison cities which is a crime against humanity for a climate change scam this cabal invented to inslave us all. </document> <category> CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of national governments </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The article reports about people protesting against the climate policy of the UK government. It highlights the situation of the city of Oxford.

EN_CC_100002.txt

CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities

CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of national governments

The article talks about the resistance movement against Climate Con Programme initiated by the UK government. The article does not really specify what the residents are specifically resisting, as the article does not give insights into this programme.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> German bosses, unions jointly oppose boycott of Russian gas German bosses, unions jointly oppose boycott of Russian gas Germany’s employers and unions have joined together in opposing an immediate European Union ban on natural gas imports from Russia over its invasion of Ukraine, saying such a move would lead to factory shutdowns and the loss of jobs in the bloc’s largest economy. “A rapid gas embargo would lead to loss of production, shutdowns, a further de-industrialization and the long-term loss of work positions in Germany,” said Rainer Dulger, chairman of the BDA employer’s group, and Reiner Hoffmann, chairman of the DGB trade union confederation, in a joint statement Monday on Germany’s dpa news agency. The statement comes as European leaders are discussing possible new energy sanctions against Russian oil, following a decision April 7 to ban Russian coal imports beginning in August. Ukraine’s leaders say revenues from Russia’s energy exports are financing Moscow’s destructive war on Ukraine and must be ended. That won’t be easy to do. The EU’s 27 nations get around 40% of their natural gas from Russia and around 25% of their oil. Natural gas would be the most difficult do without, energy analysts say, since most of it comes by pipeline from Russia and supplies of liquefied gas, which can be ordered by ship, are limited amid strong demand worldwide. Germany, a major manufacturing hub and an importer of Russian gas, has so far resisted an immediate shut-off and said it plans to instead phase out Russian oil by the end of the year and most Russian gas imports by mid-2024. The EU’s executive commission has outlined steps to cut the consumption of Russian gas by two-thirds by year’s end through using more pipeline gas from Norway and Azerbaijan, importing more liqueifed gas, accelerating the deployment of wind and solar projects and intensifying conservation efforts. German Vice Chancellor Robert Habeck said in an interview with the Funke media group that “an immediate gas embargo would endanger social peace in Germany.” Despite widespread economic sanctions against Russian banks and individuals, the EU continues to send around $850 million a day to Russia for oil and gas, even as EU governments condemn the war in Ukraine. Gas-intensive companies include producers of glass, metals, ceramics and chemicals. Industry officials say in many cases natural gas would be impossible to replace in the short run. Analysts say Russian crude oil would be easier to replace than gas but that a boycott would still lead to higher energy prices that would hit consumers who are already facing record EU inflation of 7.5%. </document> <category> URW: Negative Consequences for the West: Sanctions imposed by Western countries will backfire </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text conveys a narrative highlighting the negative economic impacts of sanctions imposed by Western countries. More specifically, the text argues that German economy would suffer significant damage in case of an immediate embargo of gas imports from Russia, calling it detrimental to social peace in Germany

EN_UA_101079.txt

URW: Negative Consequences for the West

URW: Negative Consequences for the West: Sanctions imposed by Western countries will backfire

The text presents multiple paragraphs in which sanctions are considered detrimental for EU countries, specifically pointing out the case of Germany

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> German bosses, unions jointly oppose boycott of Russian gas German bosses, unions jointly oppose boycott of Russian gas Germany’s employers and unions have joined together in opposing an immediate European Union ban on natural gas imports from Russia over its invasion of Ukraine, saying such a move would lead to factory shutdowns and the loss of jobs in the bloc’s largest economy. “A rapid gas embargo would lead to loss of production, shutdowns, a further de-industrialization and the long-term loss of work positions in Germany,” said Rainer Dulger, chairman of the BDA employer’s group, and Reiner Hoffmann, chairman of the DGB trade union confederation, in a joint statement Monday on Germany’s dpa news agency. The statement comes as European leaders are discussing possible new energy sanctions against Russian oil, following a decision April 7 to ban Russian coal imports beginning in August. Ukraine’s leaders say revenues from Russia’s energy exports are financing Moscow’s destructive war on Ukraine and must be ended. That won’t be easy to do. The EU’s 27 nations get around 40% of their natural gas from Russia and around 25% of their oil. Natural gas would be the most difficult do without, energy analysts say, since most of it comes by pipeline from Russia and supplies of liquefied gas, which can be ordered by ship, are limited amid strong demand worldwide. Germany, a major manufacturing hub and an importer of Russian gas, has so far resisted an immediate shut-off and said it plans to instead phase out Russian oil by the end of the year and most Russian gas imports by mid-2024. The EU’s executive commission has outlined steps to cut the consumption of Russian gas by two-thirds by year’s end through using more pipeline gas from Norway and Azerbaijan, importing more liqueifed gas, accelerating the deployment of wind and solar projects and intensifying conservation efforts. German Vice Chancellor Robert Habeck said in an interview with the Funke media group that “an immediate gas embargo would endanger social peace in Germany.” Despite widespread economic sanctions against Russian banks and individuals, the EU continues to send around $850 million a day to Russia for oil and gas, even as EU governments condemn the war in Ukraine. Gas-intensive companies include producers of glass, metals, ceramics and chemicals. Industry officials say in many cases natural gas would be impossible to replace in the short run. Analysts say Russian crude oil would be easier to replace than gas but that a boycott would still lead to higher energy prices that would hit consumers who are already facing record EU inflation of 7.5%. </document> <category> URW: Negative Consequences for the West: Sanctions imposed by Western countries will backfire </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Multiple paragraphs depict an hypothetical scenario in which EU sanctions to Russia backfire. First, there is a potential social unrest due to the increase of prices. Then, companies would be forced to shut down.

EN_UA_101079.txt

URW: Negative Consequences for the West

URW: Negative Consequences for the West: Sanctions imposed by Western countries will backfire

The text presents multiple paragraphs in which sanctions are considered detrimental for EU countries, specifically pointing out the case of Germany

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> German bosses, unions jointly oppose boycott of Russian gas German bosses, unions jointly oppose boycott of Russian gas Germany’s employers and unions have joined together in opposing an immediate European Union ban on natural gas imports from Russia over its invasion of Ukraine, saying such a move would lead to factory shutdowns and the loss of jobs in the bloc’s largest economy. “A rapid gas embargo would lead to loss of production, shutdowns, a further de-industrialization and the long-term loss of work positions in Germany,” said Rainer Dulger, chairman of the BDA employer’s group, and Reiner Hoffmann, chairman of the DGB trade union confederation, in a joint statement Monday on Germany’s dpa news agency. The statement comes as European leaders are discussing possible new energy sanctions against Russian oil, following a decision April 7 to ban Russian coal imports beginning in August. Ukraine’s leaders say revenues from Russia’s energy exports are financing Moscow’s destructive war on Ukraine and must be ended. That won’t be easy to do. The EU’s 27 nations get around 40% of their natural gas from Russia and around 25% of their oil. Natural gas would be the most difficult do without, energy analysts say, since most of it comes by pipeline from Russia and supplies of liquefied gas, which can be ordered by ship, are limited amid strong demand worldwide. Germany, a major manufacturing hub and an importer of Russian gas, has so far resisted an immediate shut-off and said it plans to instead phase out Russian oil by the end of the year and most Russian gas imports by mid-2024. The EU’s executive commission has outlined steps to cut the consumption of Russian gas by two-thirds by year’s end through using more pipeline gas from Norway and Azerbaijan, importing more liqueifed gas, accelerating the deployment of wind and solar projects and intensifying conservation efforts. German Vice Chancellor Robert Habeck said in an interview with the Funke media group that “an immediate gas embargo would endanger social peace in Germany.” Despite widespread economic sanctions against Russian banks and individuals, the EU continues to send around $850 million a day to Russia for oil and gas, even as EU governments condemn the war in Ukraine. Gas-intensive companies include producers of glass, metals, ceramics and chemicals. Industry officials say in many cases natural gas would be impossible to replace in the short run. Analysts say Russian crude oil would be easier to replace than gas but that a boycott would still lead to higher energy prices that would hit consumers who are already facing record EU inflation of 7.5%. </document> <category> URW: Negative Consequences for the West: Sanctions imposed by Western countries will backfire </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Several passages report that natural gas supply shortage would lead to loss of productions, factory shutdowns, the de-industrialisation of the German economy and the consequent loss of jobs

EN_UA_101079.txt

URW: Negative Consequences for the West

URW: Negative Consequences for the West: Sanctions imposed by Western countries will backfire

The text presents multiple paragraphs in which sanctions are considered detrimental for EU countries, specifically pointing out the case of Germany

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> German bosses, unions jointly oppose boycott of Russian gas German bosses, unions jointly oppose boycott of Russian gas Germany’s employers and unions have joined together in opposing an immediate European Union ban on natural gas imports from Russia over its invasion of Ukraine, saying such a move would lead to factory shutdowns and the loss of jobs in the bloc’s largest economy. “A rapid gas embargo would lead to loss of production, shutdowns, a further de-industrialization and the long-term loss of work positions in Germany,” said Rainer Dulger, chairman of the BDA employer’s group, and Reiner Hoffmann, chairman of the DGB trade union confederation, in a joint statement Monday on Germany’s dpa news agency. The statement comes as European leaders are discussing possible new energy sanctions against Russian oil, following a decision April 7 to ban Russian coal imports beginning in August. Ukraine’s leaders say revenues from Russia’s energy exports are financing Moscow’s destructive war on Ukraine and must be ended. That won’t be easy to do. The EU’s 27 nations get around 40% of their natural gas from Russia and around 25% of their oil. Natural gas would be the most difficult do without, energy analysts say, since most of it comes by pipeline from Russia and supplies of liquefied gas, which can be ordered by ship, are limited amid strong demand worldwide. Germany, a major manufacturing hub and an importer of Russian gas, has so far resisted an immediate shut-off and said it plans to instead phase out Russian oil by the end of the year and most Russian gas imports by mid-2024. The EU’s executive commission has outlined steps to cut the consumption of Russian gas by two-thirds by year’s end through using more pipeline gas from Norway and Azerbaijan, importing more liqueifed gas, accelerating the deployment of wind and solar projects and intensifying conservation efforts. German Vice Chancellor Robert Habeck said in an interview with the Funke media group that “an immediate gas embargo would endanger social peace in Germany.” Despite widespread economic sanctions against Russian banks and individuals, the EU continues to send around $850 million a day to Russia for oil and gas, even as EU governments condemn the war in Ukraine. Gas-intensive companies include producers of glass, metals, ceramics and chemicals. Industry officials say in many cases natural gas would be impossible to replace in the short run. Analysts say Russian crude oil would be easier to replace than gas but that a boycott would still lead to higher energy prices that would hit consumers who are already facing record EU inflation of 7.5%. </document> <category> URW: Negative Consequences for the West: Sanctions imposed by Western countries will backfire </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text presents some paragraphs highlighting the negative economic impact of sanctions on European countries such as Germany. In doing so, the text argues that sanctions are ineffective

EN_UA_101079.txt

URW: Negative Consequences for the West

URW: Negative Consequences for the West: Sanctions imposed by Western countries will backfire

The text presents multiple paragraphs in which sanctions are considered detrimental for EU countries, specifically pointing out the case of Germany

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> German bosses, unions jointly oppose boycott of Russian gas German bosses, unions jointly oppose boycott of Russian gas Germany’s employers and unions have joined together in opposing an immediate European Union ban on natural gas imports from Russia over its invasion of Ukraine, saying such a move would lead to factory shutdowns and the loss of jobs in the bloc’s largest economy. “A rapid gas embargo would lead to loss of production, shutdowns, a further de-industrialization and the long-term loss of work positions in Germany,” said Rainer Dulger, chairman of the BDA employer’s group, and Reiner Hoffmann, chairman of the DGB trade union confederation, in a joint statement Monday on Germany’s dpa news agency. The statement comes as European leaders are discussing possible new energy sanctions against Russian oil, following a decision April 7 to ban Russian coal imports beginning in August. Ukraine’s leaders say revenues from Russia’s energy exports are financing Moscow’s destructive war on Ukraine and must be ended. That won’t be easy to do. The EU’s 27 nations get around 40% of their natural gas from Russia and around 25% of their oil. Natural gas would be the most difficult do without, energy analysts say, since most of it comes by pipeline from Russia and supplies of liquefied gas, which can be ordered by ship, are limited amid strong demand worldwide. Germany, a major manufacturing hub and an importer of Russian gas, has so far resisted an immediate shut-off and said it plans to instead phase out Russian oil by the end of the year and most Russian gas imports by mid-2024. The EU’s executive commission has outlined steps to cut the consumption of Russian gas by two-thirds by year’s end through using more pipeline gas from Norway and Azerbaijan, importing more liqueifed gas, accelerating the deployment of wind and solar projects and intensifying conservation efforts. German Vice Chancellor Robert Habeck said in an interview with the Funke media group that “an immediate gas embargo would endanger social peace in Germany.” Despite widespread economic sanctions against Russian banks and individuals, the EU continues to send around $850 million a day to Russia for oil and gas, even as EU governments condemn the war in Ukraine. Gas-intensive companies include producers of glass, metals, ceramics and chemicals. Industry officials say in many cases natural gas would be impossible to replace in the short run. Analysts say Russian crude oil would be easier to replace than gas but that a boycott would still lead to higher energy prices that would hit consumers who are already facing record EU inflation of 7.5%. </document> <category> URW: Negative Consequences for the West: Sanctions imposed by Western countries will backfire </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Throughout multiple paragraphs, the text criticises EU sanctions against Russian gas as they would be harmful to European economy. Indeed, they would endanger social peace in Germany as well as provoke a deindustrialisation of the largest EU economy.

EN_UA_101079.txt

URW: Negative Consequences for the West

URW: Negative Consequences for the West: Sanctions imposed by Western countries will backfire

The text presents multiple paragraphs in which sanctions are considered detrimental for EU countries, specifically pointing out the case of Germany

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Denmark to Punish Farmers for Cow ‘Emissions’ to ‘Fight Global Warming’ by Frank Bergman, Slay News: The Danish government has introduced radical new laws that will tax livestock farmers for “emissions” from cows, pigs, and sheep to supposedly “fight global warming.” Demark has become the first country in the world to introduce a carbon tax that seeks to force farmers to comply with the goals of the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) “Net Zero” agenda. The Scandinavian nation will tax farmers for the so-called “greenhouse gases” allegedly emitted by their livestock from 2030. Denmark’s globalist leaders claim they are targeting a major source of methane emissions, which they allege is one of the most potent gases contributing to “global warming.” In order to comply with the WEF’s “Net Zero” targets, Taxation Minister Jeppe Bruus said the aim is to reduce Danish “greenhouse gas emissions” by 70% from 1990 levels by 2030. As of 2030, Danish livestock farmers will be taxed $43 per ton of carbon dioxide equivalent in 2030. The tax will increase to $108 by 2035. However, because of an income tax deduction of 60%, the actual cost per ton will start at $17.3 and increase to $28 by 2035. Although carbon dioxide is typically blamed for causing “climate change,” globalists claim that methane traps about 87 times more heat on a 20-year timescale. However, as Slay News has previously reported, top scientists have debunked these claims as a hoax. A recent peer-reviewed study provided conclusive scientific evidence proving that carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in Earth’s atmosphere cannot cause “global warming.” Dr. Jan Kubicki led a group of world-renowned Polish scientists to study the impact of increases in CO2 emissions on the Earth’s global temperatures. However, not only did they find that higher levels of CO2 made no difference, but they also proved that it simply isn’t possible for increases in carbon dioxide to cause temperatures to rise. Kubicki and his team recently published three papers which all conclude that Earth’s atmosphere is already “saturated” with carbon dioxide. This saturation means that, even at greatly increased levels of CO2, the “greenhouse gas” will not cause temperatures to rise. Nevertheless, unelected globalists at the United Nations Environment Program claim that livestock accounts for about 32% of “human-caused methane emissions.” “We will take a big step closer in becoming climate neutral in 2045,” Bruus said. </document> <category> CC: Questioning the measurements and science: Greenhouse effect/carbon dioxide do not drive climate change </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text questions the scientific evidence behind the greenhouse effect and carbon dioxide's impact on the climate, calling it a hoax

EN_CC_200022.txt

CC: Questioning the measurements and science

CC: Questioning the measurements and science: Greenhouse effect/carbon dioxide do not drive climate change

The author argues that CO2 has no effect on the rise of temperature and it is a myth. The author targets Danish government who has introduced law that will tax livestock farmers for emissions from cows.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Denmark to Punish Farmers for Cow ‘Emissions’ to ‘Fight Global Warming’ by Frank Bergman, Slay News: The Danish government has introduced radical new laws that will tax livestock farmers for “emissions” from cows, pigs, and sheep to supposedly “fight global warming.” Demark has become the first country in the world to introduce a carbon tax that seeks to force farmers to comply with the goals of the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) “Net Zero” agenda. The Scandinavian nation will tax farmers for the so-called “greenhouse gases” allegedly emitted by their livestock from 2030. Denmark’s globalist leaders claim they are targeting a major source of methane emissions, which they allege is one of the most potent gases contributing to “global warming.” In order to comply with the WEF’s “Net Zero” targets, Taxation Minister Jeppe Bruus said the aim is to reduce Danish “greenhouse gas emissions” by 70% from 1990 levels by 2030. As of 2030, Danish livestock farmers will be taxed $43 per ton of carbon dioxide equivalent in 2030. The tax will increase to $108 by 2035. However, because of an income tax deduction of 60%, the actual cost per ton will start at $17.3 and increase to $28 by 2035. Although carbon dioxide is typically blamed for causing “climate change,” globalists claim that methane traps about 87 times more heat on a 20-year timescale. However, as Slay News has previously reported, top scientists have debunked these claims as a hoax. A recent peer-reviewed study provided conclusive scientific evidence proving that carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in Earth’s atmosphere cannot cause “global warming.” Dr. Jan Kubicki led a group of world-renowned Polish scientists to study the impact of increases in CO2 emissions on the Earth’s global temperatures. However, not only did they find that higher levels of CO2 made no difference, but they also proved that it simply isn’t possible for increases in carbon dioxide to cause temperatures to rise. Kubicki and his team recently published three papers which all conclude that Earth’s atmosphere is already “saturated” with carbon dioxide. This saturation means that, even at greatly increased levels of CO2, the “greenhouse gas” will not cause temperatures to rise. Nevertheless, unelected globalists at the United Nations Environment Program claim that livestock accounts for about 32% of “human-caused methane emissions.” “We will take a big step closer in becoming climate neutral in 2045,” Bruus said. </document> <category> CC: Questioning the measurements and science: Greenhouse effect/carbon dioxide do not drive climate change </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text conveys a sense of alarm about the adoption of the CO2 tax by Denmark. According the the text, the tax will target livestock farmers claiming that CO2 is a main culprit of the so-called "greenhouse effect". However, the author discredits those claims arguing that scientific evidences proves the contrary.

EN_CC_200022.txt

CC: Questioning the measurements and science

CC: Questioning the measurements and science: Greenhouse effect/carbon dioxide do not drive climate change

The author argues that CO2 has no effect on the rise of temperature and it is a myth. The author targets Danish government who has introduced law that will tax livestock farmers for emissions from cows.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Denmark to Punish Farmers for Cow ‘Emissions’ to ‘Fight Global Warming’ by Frank Bergman, Slay News: The Danish government has introduced radical new laws that will tax livestock farmers for “emissions” from cows, pigs, and sheep to supposedly “fight global warming.” Demark has become the first country in the world to introduce a carbon tax that seeks to force farmers to comply with the goals of the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) “Net Zero” agenda. The Scandinavian nation will tax farmers for the so-called “greenhouse gases” allegedly emitted by their livestock from 2030. Denmark’s globalist leaders claim they are targeting a major source of methane emissions, which they allege is one of the most potent gases contributing to “global warming.” In order to comply with the WEF’s “Net Zero” targets, Taxation Minister Jeppe Bruus said the aim is to reduce Danish “greenhouse gas emissions” by 70% from 1990 levels by 2030. As of 2030, Danish livestock farmers will be taxed $43 per ton of carbon dioxide equivalent in 2030. The tax will increase to $108 by 2035. However, because of an income tax deduction of 60%, the actual cost per ton will start at $17.3 and increase to $28 by 2035. Although carbon dioxide is typically blamed for causing “climate change,” globalists claim that methane traps about 87 times more heat on a 20-year timescale. However, as Slay News has previously reported, top scientists have debunked these claims as a hoax. A recent peer-reviewed study provided conclusive scientific evidence proving that carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in Earth’s atmosphere cannot cause “global warming.” Dr. Jan Kubicki led a group of world-renowned Polish scientists to study the impact of increases in CO2 emissions on the Earth’s global temperatures. However, not only did they find that higher levels of CO2 made no difference, but they also proved that it simply isn’t possible for increases in carbon dioxide to cause temperatures to rise. Kubicki and his team recently published three papers which all conclude that Earth’s atmosphere is already “saturated” with carbon dioxide. This saturation means that, even at greatly increased levels of CO2, the “greenhouse gas” will not cause temperatures to rise. Nevertheless, unelected globalists at the United Nations Environment Program claim that livestock accounts for about 32% of “human-caused methane emissions.” “We will take a big step closer in becoming climate neutral in 2045,” Bruus said. </document> <category> CC: Questioning the measurements and science: Greenhouse effect/carbon dioxide do not drive climate change </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The article talks about the Danish government taxing livestock farmers for cows emissions. This is an example of the wrong application of science in order to reach an ideological goal. Indeed, it is widely accepted that the greenouse effect is weak and saturated.

EN_CC_200022.txt

CC: Questioning the measurements and science

CC: Questioning the measurements and science: Greenhouse effect/carbon dioxide do not drive climate change

The author argues that CO2 has no effect on the rise of temperature and it is a myth. The author targets Danish government who has introduced law that will tax livestock farmers for emissions from cows.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Denmark to Punish Farmers for Cow ‘Emissions’ to ‘Fight Global Warming’ by Frank Bergman, Slay News: The Danish government has introduced radical new laws that will tax livestock farmers for “emissions” from cows, pigs, and sheep to supposedly “fight global warming.” Demark has become the first country in the world to introduce a carbon tax that seeks to force farmers to comply with the goals of the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) “Net Zero” agenda. The Scandinavian nation will tax farmers for the so-called “greenhouse gases” allegedly emitted by their livestock from 2030. Denmark’s globalist leaders claim they are targeting a major source of methane emissions, which they allege is one of the most potent gases contributing to “global warming.” In order to comply with the WEF’s “Net Zero” targets, Taxation Minister Jeppe Bruus said the aim is to reduce Danish “greenhouse gas emissions” by 70% from 1990 levels by 2030. As of 2030, Danish livestock farmers will be taxed $43 per ton of carbon dioxide equivalent in 2030. The tax will increase to $108 by 2035. However, because of an income tax deduction of 60%, the actual cost per ton will start at $17.3 and increase to $28 by 2035. Although carbon dioxide is typically blamed for causing “climate change,” globalists claim that methane traps about 87 times more heat on a 20-year timescale. However, as Slay News has previously reported, top scientists have debunked these claims as a hoax. A recent peer-reviewed study provided conclusive scientific evidence proving that carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in Earth’s atmosphere cannot cause “global warming.” Dr. Jan Kubicki led a group of world-renowned Polish scientists to study the impact of increases in CO2 emissions on the Earth’s global temperatures. However, not only did they find that higher levels of CO2 made no difference, but they also proved that it simply isn’t possible for increases in carbon dioxide to cause temperatures to rise. Kubicki and his team recently published three papers which all conclude that Earth’s atmosphere is already “saturated” with carbon dioxide. This saturation means that, even at greatly increased levels of CO2, the “greenhouse gas” will not cause temperatures to rise. Nevertheless, unelected globalists at the United Nations Environment Program claim that livestock accounts for about 32% of “human-caused methane emissions.” “We will take a big step closer in becoming climate neutral in 2045,” Bruus said. </document> <category> CC: Questioning the measurements and science: Greenhouse effect/carbon dioxide do not drive climate change </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The article questions the Danish government's decision to tax farmers for livestock emissions as CO2 emissions are considered inefficient to drive climate change due to saturation effect in the atmosphere

EN_CC_200022.txt

CC: Questioning the measurements and science

CC: Questioning the measurements and science: Greenhouse effect/carbon dioxide do not drive climate change

The author argues that CO2 has no effect on the rise of temperature and it is a myth. The author targets Danish government who has introduced law that will tax livestock farmers for emissions from cows.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Denmark to Punish Farmers for Cow ‘Emissions’ to ‘Fight Global Warming’ by Frank Bergman, Slay News: The Danish government has introduced radical new laws that will tax livestock farmers for “emissions” from cows, pigs, and sheep to supposedly “fight global warming.” Demark has become the first country in the world to introduce a carbon tax that seeks to force farmers to comply with the goals of the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) “Net Zero” agenda. The Scandinavian nation will tax farmers for the so-called “greenhouse gases” allegedly emitted by their livestock from 2030. Denmark’s globalist leaders claim they are targeting a major source of methane emissions, which they allege is one of the most potent gases contributing to “global warming.” In order to comply with the WEF’s “Net Zero” targets, Taxation Minister Jeppe Bruus said the aim is to reduce Danish “greenhouse gas emissions” by 70% from 1990 levels by 2030. As of 2030, Danish livestock farmers will be taxed $43 per ton of carbon dioxide equivalent in 2030. The tax will increase to $108 by 2035. However, because of an income tax deduction of 60%, the actual cost per ton will start at $17.3 and increase to $28 by 2035. Although carbon dioxide is typically blamed for causing “climate change,” globalists claim that methane traps about 87 times more heat on a 20-year timescale. However, as Slay News has previously reported, top scientists have debunked these claims as a hoax. A recent peer-reviewed study provided conclusive scientific evidence proving that carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in Earth’s atmosphere cannot cause “global warming.” Dr. Jan Kubicki led a group of world-renowned Polish scientists to study the impact of increases in CO2 emissions on the Earth’s global temperatures. However, not only did they find that higher levels of CO2 made no difference, but they also proved that it simply isn’t possible for increases in carbon dioxide to cause temperatures to rise. Kubicki and his team recently published three papers which all conclude that Earth’s atmosphere is already “saturated” with carbon dioxide. This saturation means that, even at greatly increased levels of CO2, the “greenhouse gas” will not cause temperatures to rise. Nevertheless, unelected globalists at the United Nations Environment Program claim that livestock accounts for about 32% of “human-caused methane emissions.” “We will take a big step closer in becoming climate neutral in 2045,” Bruus said. </document> <category> CC: Questioning the measurements and science: Greenhouse effect/carbon dioxide do not drive climate change </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Article attacks Danish government's climate measures arguing that carbon dioxide has no effect on temperature

EN_CC_200022.txt

CC: Questioning the measurements and science

CC: Questioning the measurements and science: Greenhouse effect/carbon dioxide do not drive climate change

The author argues that CO2 has no effect on the rise of temperature and it is a myth. The author targets Danish government who has introduced law that will tax livestock farmers for emissions from cows.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Putin says what Russia needs to do to win special operation in Ukraine Russia will win the special operation in Ukraine if the society shows consolidation and composure to the enemy, President Vladimir Putin said during a visit to the Ulan-Ude Aviation Plant on March 14, Rossiya 24 TV channel said. Russia is not improving its geopolitical position in Ukraine. Instead, Russia is fighting "for the survival of Russian statehood, for the future development of the country and our children." "In order to bring peace and stability closer, we, of course, need to show the consolidation and composure of our society. When the enemy sees that our society is strong, internally braced up, consolidated, then, without any doubt we will come to reach what we are striving for — both success and victory," Putin said. According to him, many of the current problems began after the collapse of the Soviet Union, when they tried to put pressure on Russia to "destabilise the internal political situation.” "Hordes of international terrorists" new sent to the purpose to accomplish this goal, Putin said. Afterwards, the West decided to start rehabilitating Nazism in Russia's neighbouring states, including in Ukraine. Nevertheless, Putin continued, Russia had long tried to build partnerships with both Western countries and Ukraine. However, after 2014, when the West contributed to the coup in Ukraine, the state of affairs changed dramatically. It was then when they started exterminating those who advocated the development of normal relations with Russia, he said. According to Putin, Russia was forced to launch the special operation to protect the population. Western countries were hoping to break Russia quickly, but they were wrong, he said adding that Russia managed to raise its economic sovereignty since 2022. Subscribe to Pravda.Ru Telegram channel, Facebook, RSS! The fighting in several directions in the Kursk region continues. According to the Russian side, the Ukrainian Armed Forces are redeploying to attack in a new area </document> <category> URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text conveys a narrative claiming the West is behind the conflict in Ukraine and Russia is forced to act in order to protect itself.

EN_UA_013257.txt

URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader

URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors

The text presents several passages that together convey a narrative in which Russia's decision to invade Ukraine is justified by the the fact that the West attempted to undermine security of Russia, fostering terrorism, economic instability, nazism, and organizing a coup in Ukraine in 2014.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Putin says what Russia needs to do to win special operation in Ukraine Russia will win the special operation in Ukraine if the society shows consolidation and composure to the enemy, President Vladimir Putin said during a visit to the Ulan-Ude Aviation Plant on March 14, Rossiya 24 TV channel said. Russia is not improving its geopolitical position in Ukraine. Instead, Russia is fighting "for the survival of Russian statehood, for the future development of the country and our children." "In order to bring peace and stability closer, we, of course, need to show the consolidation and composure of our society. When the enemy sees that our society is strong, internally braced up, consolidated, then, without any doubt we will come to reach what we are striving for — both success and victory," Putin said. According to him, many of the current problems began after the collapse of the Soviet Union, when they tried to put pressure on Russia to "destabilise the internal political situation.” "Hordes of international terrorists" new sent to the purpose to accomplish this goal, Putin said. Afterwards, the West decided to start rehabilitating Nazism in Russia's neighbouring states, including in Ukraine. Nevertheless, Putin continued, Russia had long tried to build partnerships with both Western countries and Ukraine. However, after 2014, when the West contributed to the coup in Ukraine, the state of affairs changed dramatically. It was then when they started exterminating those who advocated the development of normal relations with Russia, he said. According to Putin, Russia was forced to launch the special operation to protect the population. Western countries were hoping to break Russia quickly, but they were wrong, he said adding that Russia managed to raise its economic sovereignty since 2022. Subscribe to Pravda.Ru Telegram channel, Facebook, RSS! The fighting in several directions in the Kursk region continues. According to the Russian side, the Ukrainian Armed Forces are redeploying to attack in a new area </document> <category> URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text adopts a narrative according to which the West are the aggressors. Putin justifies the military action in Ukraine with the need to protect the population and sovereignty.

EN_UA_013257.txt

URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader

URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors

The text presents several passages that together convey a narrative in which Russia's decision to invade Ukraine is justified by the the fact that the West attempted to undermine security of Russia, fostering terrorism, economic instability, nazism, and organizing a coup in Ukraine in 2014.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Putin says what Russia needs to do to win special operation in Ukraine Russia will win the special operation in Ukraine if the society shows consolidation and composure to the enemy, President Vladimir Putin said during a visit to the Ulan-Ude Aviation Plant on March 14, Rossiya 24 TV channel said. Russia is not improving its geopolitical position in Ukraine. Instead, Russia is fighting "for the survival of Russian statehood, for the future development of the country and our children." "In order to bring peace and stability closer, we, of course, need to show the consolidation and composure of our society. When the enemy sees that our society is strong, internally braced up, consolidated, then, without any doubt we will come to reach what we are striving for — both success and victory," Putin said. According to him, many of the current problems began after the collapse of the Soviet Union, when they tried to put pressure on Russia to "destabilise the internal political situation.” "Hordes of international terrorists" new sent to the purpose to accomplish this goal, Putin said. Afterwards, the West decided to start rehabilitating Nazism in Russia's neighbouring states, including in Ukraine. Nevertheless, Putin continued, Russia had long tried to build partnerships with both Western countries and Ukraine. However, after 2014, when the West contributed to the coup in Ukraine, the state of affairs changed dramatically. It was then when they started exterminating those who advocated the development of normal relations with Russia, he said. According to Putin, Russia was forced to launch the special operation to protect the population. Western countries were hoping to break Russia quickly, but they were wrong, he said adding that Russia managed to raise its economic sovereignty since 2022. Subscribe to Pravda.Ru Telegram channel, Facebook, RSS! The fighting in several directions in the Kursk region continues. According to the Russian side, the Ukrainian Armed Forces are redeploying to attack in a new area </document> <category> URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Several passages suggest that the war in Ukraine is not the result of the military aggression of Russia but it is the outcome of the failure of international organizations

EN_UA_013257.txt

URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader

URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors

The text presents several passages that together convey a narrative in which Russia's decision to invade Ukraine is justified by the the fact that the West attempted to undermine security of Russia, fostering terrorism, economic instability, nazism, and organizing a coup in Ukraine in 2014.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Putin says what Russia needs to do to win special operation in Ukraine Russia will win the special operation in Ukraine if the society shows consolidation and composure to the enemy, President Vladimir Putin said during a visit to the Ulan-Ude Aviation Plant on March 14, Rossiya 24 TV channel said. Russia is not improving its geopolitical position in Ukraine. Instead, Russia is fighting "for the survival of Russian statehood, for the future development of the country and our children." "In order to bring peace and stability closer, we, of course, need to show the consolidation and composure of our society. When the enemy sees that our society is strong, internally braced up, consolidated, then, without any doubt we will come to reach what we are striving for — both success and victory," Putin said. According to him, many of the current problems began after the collapse of the Soviet Union, when they tried to put pressure on Russia to "destabilise the internal political situation.” "Hordes of international terrorists" new sent to the purpose to accomplish this goal, Putin said. Afterwards, the West decided to start rehabilitating Nazism in Russia's neighbouring states, including in Ukraine. Nevertheless, Putin continued, Russia had long tried to build partnerships with both Western countries and Ukraine. However, after 2014, when the West contributed to the coup in Ukraine, the state of affairs changed dramatically. It was then when they started exterminating those who advocated the development of normal relations with Russia, he said. According to Putin, Russia was forced to launch the special operation to protect the population. Western countries were hoping to break Russia quickly, but they were wrong, he said adding that Russia managed to raise its economic sovereignty since 2022. Subscribe to Pravda.Ru Telegram channel, Facebook, RSS! The fighting in several directions in the Kursk region continues. According to the Russian side, the Ukrainian Armed Forces are redeploying to attack in a new area </document> <category> URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Throughout the whole text, Russia is portrayed as a victim of a conflict triggered by Western countries, suggesting that the latter have sent troops to Ukraine.

EN_UA_013257.txt

URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader

URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors

The text presents several passages that together convey a narrative in which Russia's decision to invade Ukraine is justified by the the fact that the West attempted to undermine security of Russia, fostering terrorism, economic instability, nazism, and organizing a coup in Ukraine in 2014.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Putin says what Russia needs to do to win special operation in Ukraine Russia will win the special operation in Ukraine if the society shows consolidation and composure to the enemy, President Vladimir Putin said during a visit to the Ulan-Ude Aviation Plant on March 14, Rossiya 24 TV channel said. Russia is not improving its geopolitical position in Ukraine. Instead, Russia is fighting "for the survival of Russian statehood, for the future development of the country and our children." "In order to bring peace and stability closer, we, of course, need to show the consolidation and composure of our society. When the enemy sees that our society is strong, internally braced up, consolidated, then, without any doubt we will come to reach what we are striving for — both success and victory," Putin said. According to him, many of the current problems began after the collapse of the Soviet Union, when they tried to put pressure on Russia to "destabilise the internal political situation.” "Hordes of international terrorists" new sent to the purpose to accomplish this goal, Putin said. Afterwards, the West decided to start rehabilitating Nazism in Russia's neighbouring states, including in Ukraine. Nevertheless, Putin continued, Russia had long tried to build partnerships with both Western countries and Ukraine. However, after 2014, when the West contributed to the coup in Ukraine, the state of affairs changed dramatically. It was then when they started exterminating those who advocated the development of normal relations with Russia, he said. According to Putin, Russia was forced to launch the special operation to protect the population. Western countries were hoping to break Russia quickly, but they were wrong, he said adding that Russia managed to raise its economic sovereignty since 2022. Subscribe to Pravda.Ru Telegram channel, Facebook, RSS! The fighting in several directions in the Kursk region continues. According to the Russian side, the Ukrainian Armed Forces are redeploying to attack in a new area </document> <category> URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

In a set of paragraphs, the author argue that Western countries are responsible for the war in Ukraine. In doing so, Russia presents itself as a victim as well as the defender of its people.

EN_UA_013257.txt

URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader

URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors

The text presents several passages that together convey a narrative in which Russia's decision to invade Ukraine is justified by the the fact that the West attempted to undermine security of Russia, fostering terrorism, economic instability, nazism, and organizing a coup in Ukraine in 2014.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Watch incredible first-person video as Russian pilot EJECTS and haplessly watches his plane crash after being shot down INCREDIBLE footage shows a panicked Russian pilot ejecting from his plane and watching as it crashes in a fireball after being shot down. The explosion could be seen miles away after the jet was taken down by what is thought to be Ukrainian fire. The fighter pilot had to release his parachute mid-air and was forced to land in an abandoned field. The shocking first-person footage is believed to have been recorded in the summer but wasn't released until now. It shows the Russian fighter pilot release his parachute mid-air after his Su-25SM was taken down by what's believed to have been incoming Ukrainian fire, according to a weapons tracking account on Twitter. The aircraft nose-dives into the ground, unleashing a hellish explosion that can be seen from miles away while the pilot lands safety in an abandoned field. READ MORE ON WORLD NEWS It is unclear what happened to the pilot since the recording but some observers claim the flight crashed during a planned training run in Belgorod region, Russia. It comes as astonishing footage shows the moment a Ukrainian tank opened fire in a vicious battle against Russian forces. Fierce fighting can be seen in the video as the 46-tonne T-84 main battle tank blasts its 125mm cannon towards Putin's men during the bloody clash that is understood to have occurred near Kherson. Ukrainian forces are seen engaging nearly point-blank with a Russian convoy who appear to have blundered into them as they drove up a dirt road. Most read in The Sun Trucks emblazoned with the "Z" symbol can see attempting to rush past the tank - only for soldiers on the ground to then open fire on them. The bearded gunner in the tank's turret ducks down as gunfire can be heard all around him. With the snaps of bullets and the boom of tank guns, the convoy - with a truck towing a howitzer and an armoured personnel carrier - grind to a halt. Other clips released as part of the video package shows the gunner opening fire on unseen foes with his heavy machine gun. It's believed Mad Vlad would happily sacrifice 20 million soldiers to ensure he won the war in Ukraine and secure his future as Russia's leader, a former insider has claimed. The chilling warning comes as fears of the war in Ukraine turning nuclear continue to grow as Russia's defence minister said a "dirty bomb" could be detonated in Ukraine. Exiled former diplomat Boris Bondarev warned Putin would sacrifice millions of lives to win in Ukraine. "He is not smart, he is just lucky. Now I think his luck is over," Mr Bondarev told Sky News. "You should have no doubt about it, he may sacrifice 10 or 20 million Russians just to win this war just to slaughter all Ukrainians because it's a matter of principle. "It's a matter of political survival to him. You have to understand that, if he loses the war, it will be the end for him." Bondarev added: "After losing the war, he will have to explain to his elites and his population why it is so and he may find some problems in explaining this. "And after that there may be opposition who will try to depose him or he will try to purge his subordinates to find some people who could be blamed for all these problems." Meanwhile, Russian war boss Sergei Shoigu warned that the brutal warzone is risking "uncontrolled escalation" as Putin's forces continue to be pushed back across the frontline. Shoigu suggested that Ukraine could actually be the one to detonate a "dirty bomb" - an explosive laced with radioactive material. And while not a true nuclear weapon, the consequences of using such a device could be catastrophic. But it has been Russia wildly swinging the nuclear sabre during the war - and the latest allegation could be another diversion tactic. Putin's forces like to spread as much chaos and misinformation as possible to cover their own tracks. READ MORE SUN STORIES Read More on The Sun And so Shoigu's warning sparks fears over what the Russians may be planning as they are beaten back across the frontline. As expected, Russia presented no evidence for their claims. </document> <category> URW: Amplifying war-related fears </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text reports multiple passages in which the use of nuclear weapons as well as the suffering of the population is addressed, amplifying the fear that the situation will worsen

EN_UA_102958.txt

URW: Amplifying war-related fears

none

In some paragraphs, the text conveys a narrative emphasizing the dangers related to the war in Ukraine, especially the potential use of unconventional weapons, the huge casualties, and the nuclear option

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Watch incredible first-person video as Russian pilot EJECTS and haplessly watches his plane crash after being shot down INCREDIBLE footage shows a panicked Russian pilot ejecting from his plane and watching as it crashes in a fireball after being shot down. The explosion could be seen miles away after the jet was taken down by what is thought to be Ukrainian fire. The fighter pilot had to release his parachute mid-air and was forced to land in an abandoned field. The shocking first-person footage is believed to have been recorded in the summer but wasn't released until now. It shows the Russian fighter pilot release his parachute mid-air after his Su-25SM was taken down by what's believed to have been incoming Ukrainian fire, according to a weapons tracking account on Twitter. The aircraft nose-dives into the ground, unleashing a hellish explosion that can be seen from miles away while the pilot lands safety in an abandoned field. READ MORE ON WORLD NEWS It is unclear what happened to the pilot since the recording but some observers claim the flight crashed during a planned training run in Belgorod region, Russia. It comes as astonishing footage shows the moment a Ukrainian tank opened fire in a vicious battle against Russian forces. Fierce fighting can be seen in the video as the 46-tonne T-84 main battle tank blasts its 125mm cannon towards Putin's men during the bloody clash that is understood to have occurred near Kherson. Ukrainian forces are seen engaging nearly point-blank with a Russian convoy who appear to have blundered into them as they drove up a dirt road. Most read in The Sun Trucks emblazoned with the "Z" symbol can see attempting to rush past the tank - only for soldiers on the ground to then open fire on them. The bearded gunner in the tank's turret ducks down as gunfire can be heard all around him. With the snaps of bullets and the boom of tank guns, the convoy - with a truck towing a howitzer and an armoured personnel carrier - grind to a halt. Other clips released as part of the video package shows the gunner opening fire on unseen foes with his heavy machine gun. It's believed Mad Vlad would happily sacrifice 20 million soldiers to ensure he won the war in Ukraine and secure his future as Russia's leader, a former insider has claimed. The chilling warning comes as fears of the war in Ukraine turning nuclear continue to grow as Russia's defence minister said a "dirty bomb" could be detonated in Ukraine. Exiled former diplomat Boris Bondarev warned Putin would sacrifice millions of lives to win in Ukraine. "He is not smart, he is just lucky. Now I think his luck is over," Mr Bondarev told Sky News. "You should have no doubt about it, he may sacrifice 10 or 20 million Russians just to win this war just to slaughter all Ukrainians because it's a matter of principle. "It's a matter of political survival to him. You have to understand that, if he loses the war, it will be the end for him." Bondarev added: "After losing the war, he will have to explain to his elites and his population why it is so and he may find some problems in explaining this. "And after that there may be opposition who will try to depose him or he will try to purge his subordinates to find some people who could be blamed for all these problems." Meanwhile, Russian war boss Sergei Shoigu warned that the brutal warzone is risking "uncontrolled escalation" as Putin's forces continue to be pushed back across the frontline. Shoigu suggested that Ukraine could actually be the one to detonate a "dirty bomb" - an explosive laced with radioactive material. And while not a true nuclear weapon, the consequences of using such a device could be catastrophic. But it has been Russia wildly swinging the nuclear sabre during the war - and the latest allegation could be another diversion tactic. Putin's forces like to spread as much chaos and misinformation as possible to cover their own tracks. READ MORE SUN STORIES Read More on The Sun And so Shoigu's warning sparks fears over what the Russians may be planning as they are beaten back across the frontline. As expected, Russia presented no evidence for their claims. </document> <category> URW: Amplifying war-related fears </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text aims at amplifing the fears related to the use of unconventional weapons in the context of the war in Ukraine. Throughout multiple paragraphs, the article talks about how nuclear weapons could be used by Russia, speculating on the reasons why it could happen.

EN_UA_102958.txt

URW: Amplifying war-related fears

none

In some paragraphs, the text conveys a narrative emphasizing the dangers related to the war in Ukraine, especially the potential use of unconventional weapons, the huge casualties, and the nuclear option

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Watch incredible first-person video as Russian pilot EJECTS and haplessly watches his plane crash after being shot down INCREDIBLE footage shows a panicked Russian pilot ejecting from his plane and watching as it crashes in a fireball after being shot down. The explosion could be seen miles away after the jet was taken down by what is thought to be Ukrainian fire. The fighter pilot had to release his parachute mid-air and was forced to land in an abandoned field. The shocking first-person footage is believed to have been recorded in the summer but wasn't released until now. It shows the Russian fighter pilot release his parachute mid-air after his Su-25SM was taken down by what's believed to have been incoming Ukrainian fire, according to a weapons tracking account on Twitter. The aircraft nose-dives into the ground, unleashing a hellish explosion that can be seen from miles away while the pilot lands safety in an abandoned field. READ MORE ON WORLD NEWS It is unclear what happened to the pilot since the recording but some observers claim the flight crashed during a planned training run in Belgorod region, Russia. It comes as astonishing footage shows the moment a Ukrainian tank opened fire in a vicious battle against Russian forces. Fierce fighting can be seen in the video as the 46-tonne T-84 main battle tank blasts its 125mm cannon towards Putin's men during the bloody clash that is understood to have occurred near Kherson. Ukrainian forces are seen engaging nearly point-blank with a Russian convoy who appear to have blundered into them as they drove up a dirt road. Most read in The Sun Trucks emblazoned with the "Z" symbol can see attempting to rush past the tank - only for soldiers on the ground to then open fire on them. The bearded gunner in the tank's turret ducks down as gunfire can be heard all around him. With the snaps of bullets and the boom of tank guns, the convoy - with a truck towing a howitzer and an armoured personnel carrier - grind to a halt. Other clips released as part of the video package shows the gunner opening fire on unseen foes with his heavy machine gun. It's believed Mad Vlad would happily sacrifice 20 million soldiers to ensure he won the war in Ukraine and secure his future as Russia's leader, a former insider has claimed. The chilling warning comes as fears of the war in Ukraine turning nuclear continue to grow as Russia's defence minister said a "dirty bomb" could be detonated in Ukraine. Exiled former diplomat Boris Bondarev warned Putin would sacrifice millions of lives to win in Ukraine. "He is not smart, he is just lucky. Now I think his luck is over," Mr Bondarev told Sky News. "You should have no doubt about it, he may sacrifice 10 or 20 million Russians just to win this war just to slaughter all Ukrainians because it's a matter of principle. "It's a matter of political survival to him. You have to understand that, if he loses the war, it will be the end for him." Bondarev added: "After losing the war, he will have to explain to his elites and his population why it is so and he may find some problems in explaining this. "And after that there may be opposition who will try to depose him or he will try to purge his subordinates to find some people who could be blamed for all these problems." Meanwhile, Russian war boss Sergei Shoigu warned that the brutal warzone is risking "uncontrolled escalation" as Putin's forces continue to be pushed back across the frontline. Shoigu suggested that Ukraine could actually be the one to detonate a "dirty bomb" - an explosive laced with radioactive material. And while not a true nuclear weapon, the consequences of using such a device could be catastrophic. But it has been Russia wildly swinging the nuclear sabre during the war - and the latest allegation could be another diversion tactic. Putin's forces like to spread as much chaos and misinformation as possible to cover their own tracks. READ MORE SUN STORIES Read More on The Sun And so Shoigu's warning sparks fears over what the Russians may be planning as they are beaten back across the frontline. As expected, Russia presented no evidence for their claims. </document> <category> URW: Amplifying war-related fears </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Article talks about Russia using dirty bombs while trying to distract the attention from battlefield losses.

EN_UA_102958.txt

URW: Amplifying war-related fears

none

In some paragraphs, the text conveys a narrative emphasizing the dangers related to the war in Ukraine, especially the potential use of unconventional weapons, the huge casualties, and the nuclear option

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Watch incredible first-person video as Russian pilot EJECTS and haplessly watches his plane crash after being shot down INCREDIBLE footage shows a panicked Russian pilot ejecting from his plane and watching as it crashes in a fireball after being shot down. The explosion could be seen miles away after the jet was taken down by what is thought to be Ukrainian fire. The fighter pilot had to release his parachute mid-air and was forced to land in an abandoned field. The shocking first-person footage is believed to have been recorded in the summer but wasn't released until now. It shows the Russian fighter pilot release his parachute mid-air after his Su-25SM was taken down by what's believed to have been incoming Ukrainian fire, according to a weapons tracking account on Twitter. The aircraft nose-dives into the ground, unleashing a hellish explosion that can be seen from miles away while the pilot lands safety in an abandoned field. READ MORE ON WORLD NEWS It is unclear what happened to the pilot since the recording but some observers claim the flight crashed during a planned training run in Belgorod region, Russia. It comes as astonishing footage shows the moment a Ukrainian tank opened fire in a vicious battle against Russian forces. Fierce fighting can be seen in the video as the 46-tonne T-84 main battle tank blasts its 125mm cannon towards Putin's men during the bloody clash that is understood to have occurred near Kherson. Ukrainian forces are seen engaging nearly point-blank with a Russian convoy who appear to have blundered into them as they drove up a dirt road. Most read in The Sun Trucks emblazoned with the "Z" symbol can see attempting to rush past the tank - only for soldiers on the ground to then open fire on them. The bearded gunner in the tank's turret ducks down as gunfire can be heard all around him. With the snaps of bullets and the boom of tank guns, the convoy - with a truck towing a howitzer and an armoured personnel carrier - grind to a halt. Other clips released as part of the video package shows the gunner opening fire on unseen foes with his heavy machine gun. It's believed Mad Vlad would happily sacrifice 20 million soldiers to ensure he won the war in Ukraine and secure his future as Russia's leader, a former insider has claimed. The chilling warning comes as fears of the war in Ukraine turning nuclear continue to grow as Russia's defence minister said a "dirty bomb" could be detonated in Ukraine. Exiled former diplomat Boris Bondarev warned Putin would sacrifice millions of lives to win in Ukraine. "He is not smart, he is just lucky. Now I think his luck is over," Mr Bondarev told Sky News. "You should have no doubt about it, he may sacrifice 10 or 20 million Russians just to win this war just to slaughter all Ukrainians because it's a matter of principle. "It's a matter of political survival to him. You have to understand that, if he loses the war, it will be the end for him." Bondarev added: "After losing the war, he will have to explain to his elites and his population why it is so and he may find some problems in explaining this. "And after that there may be opposition who will try to depose him or he will try to purge his subordinates to find some people who could be blamed for all these problems." Meanwhile, Russian war boss Sergei Shoigu warned that the brutal warzone is risking "uncontrolled escalation" as Putin's forces continue to be pushed back across the frontline. Shoigu suggested that Ukraine could actually be the one to detonate a "dirty bomb" - an explosive laced with radioactive material. And while not a true nuclear weapon, the consequences of using such a device could be catastrophic. But it has been Russia wildly swinging the nuclear sabre during the war - and the latest allegation could be another diversion tactic. Putin's forces like to spread as much chaos and misinformation as possible to cover their own tracks. READ MORE SUN STORIES Read More on The Sun And so Shoigu's warning sparks fears over what the Russians may be planning as they are beaten back across the frontline. As expected, Russia presented no evidence for their claims. </document> <category> URW: Amplifying war-related fears </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The author talks about how Russia is escalating the situation in Ukraine with nuclear weapons.

EN_UA_102958.txt

URW: Amplifying war-related fears

none

In some paragraphs, the text conveys a narrative emphasizing the dangers related to the war in Ukraine, especially the potential use of unconventional weapons, the huge casualties, and the nuclear option

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Watch incredible first-person video as Russian pilot EJECTS and haplessly watches his plane crash after being shot down INCREDIBLE footage shows a panicked Russian pilot ejecting from his plane and watching as it crashes in a fireball after being shot down. The explosion could be seen miles away after the jet was taken down by what is thought to be Ukrainian fire. The fighter pilot had to release his parachute mid-air and was forced to land in an abandoned field. The shocking first-person footage is believed to have been recorded in the summer but wasn't released until now. It shows the Russian fighter pilot release his parachute mid-air after his Su-25SM was taken down by what's believed to have been incoming Ukrainian fire, according to a weapons tracking account on Twitter. The aircraft nose-dives into the ground, unleashing a hellish explosion that can be seen from miles away while the pilot lands safety in an abandoned field. READ MORE ON WORLD NEWS It is unclear what happened to the pilot since the recording but some observers claim the flight crashed during a planned training run in Belgorod region, Russia. It comes as astonishing footage shows the moment a Ukrainian tank opened fire in a vicious battle against Russian forces. Fierce fighting can be seen in the video as the 46-tonne T-84 main battle tank blasts its 125mm cannon towards Putin's men during the bloody clash that is understood to have occurred near Kherson. Ukrainian forces are seen engaging nearly point-blank with a Russian convoy who appear to have blundered into them as they drove up a dirt road. Most read in The Sun Trucks emblazoned with the "Z" symbol can see attempting to rush past the tank - only for soldiers on the ground to then open fire on them. The bearded gunner in the tank's turret ducks down as gunfire can be heard all around him. With the snaps of bullets and the boom of tank guns, the convoy - with a truck towing a howitzer and an armoured personnel carrier - grind to a halt. Other clips released as part of the video package shows the gunner opening fire on unseen foes with his heavy machine gun. It's believed Mad Vlad would happily sacrifice 20 million soldiers to ensure he won the war in Ukraine and secure his future as Russia's leader, a former insider has claimed. The chilling warning comes as fears of the war in Ukraine turning nuclear continue to grow as Russia's defence minister said a "dirty bomb" could be detonated in Ukraine. Exiled former diplomat Boris Bondarev warned Putin would sacrifice millions of lives to win in Ukraine. "He is not smart, he is just lucky. Now I think his luck is over," Mr Bondarev told Sky News. "You should have no doubt about it, he may sacrifice 10 or 20 million Russians just to win this war just to slaughter all Ukrainians because it's a matter of principle. "It's a matter of political survival to him. You have to understand that, if he loses the war, it will be the end for him." Bondarev added: "After losing the war, he will have to explain to his elites and his population why it is so and he may find some problems in explaining this. "And after that there may be opposition who will try to depose him or he will try to purge his subordinates to find some people who could be blamed for all these problems." Meanwhile, Russian war boss Sergei Shoigu warned that the brutal warzone is risking "uncontrolled escalation" as Putin's forces continue to be pushed back across the frontline. Shoigu suggested that Ukraine could actually be the one to detonate a "dirty bomb" - an explosive laced with radioactive material. And while not a true nuclear weapon, the consequences of using such a device could be catastrophic. But it has been Russia wildly swinging the nuclear sabre during the war - and the latest allegation could be another diversion tactic. Putin's forces like to spread as much chaos and misinformation as possible to cover their own tracks. READ MORE SUN STORIES Read More on The Sun And so Shoigu's warning sparks fears over what the Russians may be planning as they are beaten back across the frontline. As expected, Russia presented no evidence for their claims. </document> <category> URW: Amplifying war-related fears </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Article quoting Russian official in effort to frame Ukraine as possible dirty bomb attacker. In doing so, it seeks to justify Russian aggression.

EN_UA_102958.txt

URW: Amplifying war-related fears

none

In some paragraphs, the text conveys a narrative emphasizing the dangers related to the war in Ukraine, especially the potential use of unconventional weapons, the huge casualties, and the nuclear option

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Russia Says US Is Responsible for Deadly Ukrainian Attack on Crimea MOSCOW—Russia said on Sunday that the United States was responsible for a Ukrainian attack on Crimean peninsula with five U.S.–supplied missiles that killed four people, including two children, and injured 151 more. The Russian Defence Ministry said four of the U.S.–delivered Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) missiles, equipped with cluster warheads, were shot down by air defense systems and the ammunition of a fifth had detonated in mid-air. Footage on Russian state television showed people running from a beach and some people being carried off on sun loungers. Russian authorities in Crimea said missile fragments had fallen just after noon near a beach on the north side of the city of Sevastopol where locals were on holiday. The incident generated a furious reaction among Russian public figures. The Defense Ministry said U.S. specialists had set the missiles’ flight coordinates on the basis of information from U.S. spy satellites, meaning Washington was directly responsible. “Responsibility for the deliberate missile attack on the civilians of Sevastopol is borne above all by Washington, which supplied these weapons to Ukraine, and by the Kyiv regime, from whose territory this strike was carried out,” the ministry said. Russia sent its troops into Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022. The United States began supplying Ukraine with longer range ATACMS missiles, which have a 300-kilometre (186-mile) range, earlier this year. Treating the InjuredSevastopol Governor Mihail Razvozhaev put the death toll at four, with 144 injured, including 82 taken to hospitals. Twenty-seven children were among the injured. Specialist doctors were being flown in from other parts of Russia. Russia will respond to Sunday’s attack, the Defense Ministry said, without elaborating. The Kremlin said President Vladimir Putin had been “in constant contact with the military” since the attack. Dmitry Medvedev, Deputy Chairman of the Security Council, described the incident as “a vile, despicable act against our people.” He likened it to attacks carried out by gunmen on Sunday against a synagogue, a church, and police post in Dagestan and said there was “no difference to us” between the U.S. administration, Ukrainian leaders, and “crazy fanatics.” Russian Orthodox Patriarch Kirill said there “was no justification whatsoever for a missile strike on civilians” and expressed indignation that the incident occurred on the Orthodox holiday of Trinity. Neither Ukraine nor the United States has commented on the attack, which came on a day when Ukraine said one person had been killed and 10 others wounded by Russian strikes on the eastern Ukrainian city of Kharkiv. </document> <category> URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text conveys a narrative suggesting that the US are the aggressors since they provided Ukraine with weapons allowing the latter to attack Russia. The text adopts a belligerent tone describing the US as responsible for the attack.

EN_UA_027787.txt

URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader

URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors

Throughout several paragraphs, the text suggests that the US is responsible for military attacks on Russian territories, arguing that the US are directly involved in the conflict.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Russia Says US Is Responsible for Deadly Ukrainian Attack on Crimea MOSCOW—Russia said on Sunday that the United States was responsible for a Ukrainian attack on Crimean peninsula with five U.S.–supplied missiles that killed four people, including two children, and injured 151 more. The Russian Defence Ministry said four of the U.S.–delivered Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) missiles, equipped with cluster warheads, were shot down by air defense systems and the ammunition of a fifth had detonated in mid-air. Footage on Russian state television showed people running from a beach and some people being carried off on sun loungers. Russian authorities in Crimea said missile fragments had fallen just after noon near a beach on the north side of the city of Sevastopol where locals were on holiday. The incident generated a furious reaction among Russian public figures. The Defense Ministry said U.S. specialists had set the missiles’ flight coordinates on the basis of information from U.S. spy satellites, meaning Washington was directly responsible. “Responsibility for the deliberate missile attack on the civilians of Sevastopol is borne above all by Washington, which supplied these weapons to Ukraine, and by the Kyiv regime, from whose territory this strike was carried out,” the ministry said. Russia sent its troops into Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022. The United States began supplying Ukraine with longer range ATACMS missiles, which have a 300-kilometre (186-mile) range, earlier this year. Treating the InjuredSevastopol Governor Mihail Razvozhaev put the death toll at four, with 144 injured, including 82 taken to hospitals. Twenty-seven children were among the injured. Specialist doctors were being flown in from other parts of Russia. Russia will respond to Sunday’s attack, the Defense Ministry said, without elaborating. The Kremlin said President Vladimir Putin had been “in constant contact with the military” since the attack. Dmitry Medvedev, Deputy Chairman of the Security Council, described the incident as “a vile, despicable act against our people.” He likened it to attacks carried out by gunmen on Sunday against a synagogue, a church, and police post in Dagestan and said there was “no difference to us” between the U.S. administration, Ukrainian leaders, and “crazy fanatics.” Russian Orthodox Patriarch Kirill said there “was no justification whatsoever for a missile strike on civilians” and expressed indignation that the incident occurred on the Orthodox holiday of Trinity. Neither Ukraine nor the United States has commented on the attack, which came on a day when Ukraine said one person had been killed and 10 others wounded by Russian strikes on the eastern Ukrainian city of Kharkiv. </document> <category> URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Several passages argue that the US is directly involved in the conflict and thus ultimately responsible for the attack on Sevastopol.

EN_UA_027787.txt

URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader

URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors

Throughout several paragraphs, the text suggests that the US is responsible for military attacks on Russian territories, arguing that the US are directly involved in the conflict.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Russia Says US Is Responsible for Deadly Ukrainian Attack on Crimea MOSCOW—Russia said on Sunday that the United States was responsible for a Ukrainian attack on Crimean peninsula with five U.S.–supplied missiles that killed four people, including two children, and injured 151 more. The Russian Defence Ministry said four of the U.S.–delivered Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) missiles, equipped with cluster warheads, were shot down by air defense systems and the ammunition of a fifth had detonated in mid-air. Footage on Russian state television showed people running from a beach and some people being carried off on sun loungers. Russian authorities in Crimea said missile fragments had fallen just after noon near a beach on the north side of the city of Sevastopol where locals were on holiday. The incident generated a furious reaction among Russian public figures. The Defense Ministry said U.S. specialists had set the missiles’ flight coordinates on the basis of information from U.S. spy satellites, meaning Washington was directly responsible. “Responsibility for the deliberate missile attack on the civilians of Sevastopol is borne above all by Washington, which supplied these weapons to Ukraine, and by the Kyiv regime, from whose territory this strike was carried out,” the ministry said. Russia sent its troops into Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022. The United States began supplying Ukraine with longer range ATACMS missiles, which have a 300-kilometre (186-mile) range, earlier this year. Treating the InjuredSevastopol Governor Mihail Razvozhaev put the death toll at four, with 144 injured, including 82 taken to hospitals. Twenty-seven children were among the injured. Specialist doctors were being flown in from other parts of Russia. Russia will respond to Sunday’s attack, the Defense Ministry said, without elaborating. The Kremlin said President Vladimir Putin had been “in constant contact with the military” since the attack. Dmitry Medvedev, Deputy Chairman of the Security Council, described the incident as “a vile, despicable act against our people.” He likened it to attacks carried out by gunmen on Sunday against a synagogue, a church, and police post in Dagestan and said there was “no difference to us” between the U.S. administration, Ukrainian leaders, and “crazy fanatics.” Russian Orthodox Patriarch Kirill said there “was no justification whatsoever for a missile strike on civilians” and expressed indignation that the incident occurred on the Orthodox holiday of Trinity. Neither Ukraine nor the United States has commented on the attack, which came on a day when Ukraine said one person had been killed and 10 others wounded by Russian strikes on the eastern Ukrainian city of Kharkiv. </document> <category> URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text suggest that the US are the real aggressor, using Ukraine as a puppet, pointing out that US military personnel are directly involved in the war effort, suggesting that US intelligence provides real-time info to Ukraine

EN_UA_027787.txt

URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader

URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors

Throughout several paragraphs, the text suggests that the US is responsible for military attacks on Russian territories, arguing that the US are directly involved in the conflict.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Russia Says US Is Responsible for Deadly Ukrainian Attack on Crimea MOSCOW—Russia said on Sunday that the United States was responsible for a Ukrainian attack on Crimean peninsula with five U.S.–supplied missiles that killed four people, including two children, and injured 151 more. The Russian Defence Ministry said four of the U.S.–delivered Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) missiles, equipped with cluster warheads, were shot down by air defense systems and the ammunition of a fifth had detonated in mid-air. Footage on Russian state television showed people running from a beach and some people being carried off on sun loungers. Russian authorities in Crimea said missile fragments had fallen just after noon near a beach on the north side of the city of Sevastopol where locals were on holiday. The incident generated a furious reaction among Russian public figures. The Defense Ministry said U.S. specialists had set the missiles’ flight coordinates on the basis of information from U.S. spy satellites, meaning Washington was directly responsible. “Responsibility for the deliberate missile attack on the civilians of Sevastopol is borne above all by Washington, which supplied these weapons to Ukraine, and by the Kyiv regime, from whose territory this strike was carried out,” the ministry said. Russia sent its troops into Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022. The United States began supplying Ukraine with longer range ATACMS missiles, which have a 300-kilometre (186-mile) range, earlier this year. Treating the InjuredSevastopol Governor Mihail Razvozhaev put the death toll at four, with 144 injured, including 82 taken to hospitals. Twenty-seven children were among the injured. Specialist doctors were being flown in from other parts of Russia. Russia will respond to Sunday’s attack, the Defense Ministry said, without elaborating. The Kremlin said President Vladimir Putin had been “in constant contact with the military” since the attack. Dmitry Medvedev, Deputy Chairman of the Security Council, described the incident as “a vile, despicable act against our people.” He likened it to attacks carried out by gunmen on Sunday against a synagogue, a church, and police post in Dagestan and said there was “no difference to us” between the U.S. administration, Ukrainian leaders, and “crazy fanatics.” Russian Orthodox Patriarch Kirill said there “was no justification whatsoever for a missile strike on civilians” and expressed indignation that the incident occurred on the Orthodox holiday of Trinity. Neither Ukraine nor the United States has commented on the attack, which came on a day when Ukraine said one person had been killed and 10 others wounded by Russian strikes on the eastern Ukrainian city of Kharkiv. </document> <category> URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text conveys a narrative that US is the main culprit for the aggression towards Russia and the Russian people, despite the fact that Ukraine is the defender of its home soil.

EN_UA_027787.txt

URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader

URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors

Throughout several paragraphs, the text suggests that the US is responsible for military attacks on Russian territories, arguing that the US are directly involved in the conflict.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Russia Says US Is Responsible for Deadly Ukrainian Attack on Crimea MOSCOW—Russia said on Sunday that the United States was responsible for a Ukrainian attack on Crimean peninsula with five U.S.–supplied missiles that killed four people, including two children, and injured 151 more. The Russian Defence Ministry said four of the U.S.–delivered Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) missiles, equipped with cluster warheads, were shot down by air defense systems and the ammunition of a fifth had detonated in mid-air. Footage on Russian state television showed people running from a beach and some people being carried off on sun loungers. Russian authorities in Crimea said missile fragments had fallen just after noon near a beach on the north side of the city of Sevastopol where locals were on holiday. The incident generated a furious reaction among Russian public figures. The Defense Ministry said U.S. specialists had set the missiles’ flight coordinates on the basis of information from U.S. spy satellites, meaning Washington was directly responsible. “Responsibility for the deliberate missile attack on the civilians of Sevastopol is borne above all by Washington, which supplied these weapons to Ukraine, and by the Kyiv regime, from whose territory this strike was carried out,” the ministry said. Russia sent its troops into Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022. The United States began supplying Ukraine with longer range ATACMS missiles, which have a 300-kilometre (186-mile) range, earlier this year. Treating the InjuredSevastopol Governor Mihail Razvozhaev put the death toll at four, with 144 injured, including 82 taken to hospitals. Twenty-seven children were among the injured. Specialist doctors were being flown in from other parts of Russia. Russia will respond to Sunday’s attack, the Defense Ministry said, without elaborating. The Kremlin said President Vladimir Putin had been “in constant contact with the military” since the attack. Dmitry Medvedev, Deputy Chairman of the Security Council, described the incident as “a vile, despicable act against our people.” He likened it to attacks carried out by gunmen on Sunday against a synagogue, a church, and police post in Dagestan and said there was “no difference to us” between the U.S. administration, Ukrainian leaders, and “crazy fanatics.” Russian Orthodox Patriarch Kirill said there “was no justification whatsoever for a missile strike on civilians” and expressed indignation that the incident occurred on the Orthodox holiday of Trinity. Neither Ukraine nor the United States has commented on the attack, which came on a day when Ukraine said one person had been killed and 10 others wounded by Russian strikes on the eastern Ukrainian city of Kharkiv. </document> <category> URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

In the context of a deadly Ukrainian attack on Sevastopol, Russia claimed that the United States is ultimately responsible for the attack since it supplied Ukraine with the missiles used in the attack.

EN_UA_027787.txt

URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader

URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors

Throughout several paragraphs, the text suggests that the US is responsible for military attacks on Russian territories, arguing that the US are directly involved in the conflict.