Datasets:

Erland

/

NLP701_Assignment2_Subtask3_KTO_Dataset_2

like 0

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Dramatic moment anti-Putin troops ‘INVADE Russia in tank and drone assault across border before seizing village’ DRAMATIC video shows a tank storming across the border from Ukraine into Russia today as anti-Putin soldiers claimed to have seized villages. Drones were also reportedly used in the "invasion" as explosions rang out along the frontier in the Belgorod region - where the local governor issued a desperate "don't panic" message to residents. The governor of the Belgorod region, Vyacheslav Gladkov, told residents that to ensure safety of citizens in the region, a "counter-terrorist regime" has been introduced. Russian authorities said a "Ukrainian Army sabotage group" crossed the border and forces were "taking measures to eliminate the enemy". Ukrainian intelligence said those involved in the incursion were "solely Russian nationals". The provocative move was claimed by the Freedom of Russia Legion, a unit made up of ethnic Russian volunteers and defectors from the Russian army to fight alongside Ukraine. READ MORE IN WORLD NEWS In an unverified video today, members of the anti-Putin group posed in front of a road sign and an armoured car. They claimed: "We have again crossed the border of the Russian Federation. Russia will soon be free. "The time to fight for the freedom of Russia has come. "We want our children to grow up in peace and be free people... but that has no place in today's Putin's Russia." Most read in The Sun Armoured vehicles with Ukrainian markings were also spotted near the border, further fuelling rumours of an invasion by pro-Ukraine Russian saboteurs. Smoke was spotted in multiple locations near border checkpoints in the region, along with videos online appearing to show a Russian soldier dead inside a checkpoint building. And a helicopter was reportedly seen flying low over houses and deploying anti-missile flares in Rakitnoye, some 30 miles from the Grayvoron border crossing where the tank was spotted. One post showed a radio message urgently telling Belgorod citizens to evacuate the area. Governor Gladkov told residents earlier today: "No one is hurt, the evacuation from Shebensky district is a lie. "I urge you not to listen to enemies and not to panic." In a post on Telegram, the Freedom of Russia Legion shared a photo of a "free Russia" flag on a bridge. They said: "The first flags of free Russia met the dawn over the liberated cities. Raise the flags in your cities too. Freedom is near!" The group claimed they had taken control of Kozinka and Gora-Podol villages. Rumours spread that up to six other villages came under drone and mortar fire. The flag raised in the photo is the flag used by Russian anti-war protesters - many of whom live in eastern Ukraine - and is also displayed on the Freedom of Russia Legion's Telegram channel. It describes them as "free citizens of Russia" who are fighting against the "dictatorial regime" in Russia. Another video widely shared online appeared to show the soldiers running into the streets of the southern Belgorod region. This was followed by aerial shots of border towns showing smoke billowing from multiple buildings. Russian authorities said administrative building in the town of Golovchino was allegedly struck by a drone, and part of a rocket fell into the garden of a home in the village of Antonovka. Authorities claimed to have full control of the villages and said they were hunting the "terrorists" involved in the incursion. READ MORE SUN STORIES In March, Putin accused Ukraine of launching a terror attack after members of the Legion crossed the border further north. However footage showing it was a stunt by anti-Kremlin Russians waving flags for the camera. </document> <category> URW: Speculating war outcomes: Russian army is collapsing </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Several paragraphs report alleged failures of Russian military in multiple fronts in Russia/Ukraine conflict, speculating the possibility of military collapse.

EN_UA_015962.txt

URW: Speculating war outcomes

URW: Speculating war outcomes: Russian army is collapsing

The text presents a difficult situation for Russian troops that have to face a military incursion in Russian territories. Several paragraphs depict the situation as uncertain and confused, indicating that Russian military is struggling to control the situation.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Dramatic moment anti-Putin troops ‘INVADE Russia in tank and drone assault across border before seizing village’ DRAMATIC video shows a tank storming across the border from Ukraine into Russia today as anti-Putin soldiers claimed to have seized villages. Drones were also reportedly used in the "invasion" as explosions rang out along the frontier in the Belgorod region - where the local governor issued a desperate "don't panic" message to residents. The governor of the Belgorod region, Vyacheslav Gladkov, told residents that to ensure safety of citizens in the region, a "counter-terrorist regime" has been introduced. Russian authorities said a "Ukrainian Army sabotage group" crossed the border and forces were "taking measures to eliminate the enemy". Ukrainian intelligence said those involved in the incursion were "solely Russian nationals". The provocative move was claimed by the Freedom of Russia Legion, a unit made up of ethnic Russian volunteers and defectors from the Russian army to fight alongside Ukraine. READ MORE IN WORLD NEWS In an unverified video today, members of the anti-Putin group posed in front of a road sign and an armoured car. They claimed: "We have again crossed the border of the Russian Federation. Russia will soon be free. "The time to fight for the freedom of Russia has come. "We want our children to grow up in peace and be free people... but that has no place in today's Putin's Russia." Most read in The Sun Armoured vehicles with Ukrainian markings were also spotted near the border, further fuelling rumours of an invasion by pro-Ukraine Russian saboteurs. Smoke was spotted in multiple locations near border checkpoints in the region, along with videos online appearing to show a Russian soldier dead inside a checkpoint building. And a helicopter was reportedly seen flying low over houses and deploying anti-missile flares in Rakitnoye, some 30 miles from the Grayvoron border crossing where the tank was spotted. One post showed a radio message urgently telling Belgorod citizens to evacuate the area. Governor Gladkov told residents earlier today: "No one is hurt, the evacuation from Shebensky district is a lie. "I urge you not to listen to enemies and not to panic." In a post on Telegram, the Freedom of Russia Legion shared a photo of a "free Russia" flag on a bridge. They said: "The first flags of free Russia met the dawn over the liberated cities. Raise the flags in your cities too. Freedom is near!" The group claimed they had taken control of Kozinka and Gora-Podol villages. Rumours spread that up to six other villages came under drone and mortar fire. The flag raised in the photo is the flag used by Russian anti-war protesters - many of whom live in eastern Ukraine - and is also displayed on the Freedom of Russia Legion's Telegram channel. It describes them as "free citizens of Russia" who are fighting against the "dictatorial regime" in Russia. Another video widely shared online appeared to show the soldiers running into the streets of the southern Belgorod region. This was followed by aerial shots of border towns showing smoke billowing from multiple buildings. Russian authorities said administrative building in the town of Golovchino was allegedly struck by a drone, and part of a rocket fell into the garden of a home in the village of Antonovka. Authorities claimed to have full control of the villages and said they were hunting the "terrorists" involved in the incursion. READ MORE SUN STORIES In March, Putin accused Ukraine of launching a terror attack after members of the Legion crossed the border further north. However footage showing it was a stunt by anti-Kremlin Russians waving flags for the camera. </document> <category> URW: Speculating war outcomes: Russian army is collapsing </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text conveys a sense of urgency depicting Russian army as in disarray due to an incursion into Russian territories.

EN_UA_015962.txt

URW: Speculating war outcomes

URW: Speculating war outcomes: Russian army is collapsing

The text presents a difficult situation for Russian troops that have to face a military incursion in Russian territories. Several paragraphs depict the situation as uncertain and confused, indicating that Russian military is struggling to control the situation.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Dramatic moment anti-Putin troops ‘INVADE Russia in tank and drone assault across border before seizing village’ DRAMATIC video shows a tank storming across the border from Ukraine into Russia today as anti-Putin soldiers claimed to have seized villages. Drones were also reportedly used in the "invasion" as explosions rang out along the frontier in the Belgorod region - where the local governor issued a desperate "don't panic" message to residents. The governor of the Belgorod region, Vyacheslav Gladkov, told residents that to ensure safety of citizens in the region, a "counter-terrorist regime" has been introduced. Russian authorities said a "Ukrainian Army sabotage group" crossed the border and forces were "taking measures to eliminate the enemy". Ukrainian intelligence said those involved in the incursion were "solely Russian nationals". The provocative move was claimed by the Freedom of Russia Legion, a unit made up of ethnic Russian volunteers and defectors from the Russian army to fight alongside Ukraine. READ MORE IN WORLD NEWS In an unverified video today, members of the anti-Putin group posed in front of a road sign and an armoured car. They claimed: "We have again crossed the border of the Russian Federation. Russia will soon be free. "The time to fight for the freedom of Russia has come. "We want our children to grow up in peace and be free people... but that has no place in today's Putin's Russia." Most read in The Sun Armoured vehicles with Ukrainian markings were also spotted near the border, further fuelling rumours of an invasion by pro-Ukraine Russian saboteurs. Smoke was spotted in multiple locations near border checkpoints in the region, along with videos online appearing to show a Russian soldier dead inside a checkpoint building. And a helicopter was reportedly seen flying low over houses and deploying anti-missile flares in Rakitnoye, some 30 miles from the Grayvoron border crossing where the tank was spotted. One post showed a radio message urgently telling Belgorod citizens to evacuate the area. Governor Gladkov told residents earlier today: "No one is hurt, the evacuation from Shebensky district is a lie. "I urge you not to listen to enemies and not to panic." In a post on Telegram, the Freedom of Russia Legion shared a photo of a "free Russia" flag on a bridge. They said: "The first flags of free Russia met the dawn over the liberated cities. Raise the flags in your cities too. Freedom is near!" The group claimed they had taken control of Kozinka and Gora-Podol villages. Rumours spread that up to six other villages came under drone and mortar fire. The flag raised in the photo is the flag used by Russian anti-war protesters - many of whom live in eastern Ukraine - and is also displayed on the Freedom of Russia Legion's Telegram channel. It describes them as "free citizens of Russia" who are fighting against the "dictatorial regime" in Russia. Another video widely shared online appeared to show the soldiers running into the streets of the southern Belgorod region. This was followed by aerial shots of border towns showing smoke billowing from multiple buildings. Russian authorities said administrative building in the town of Golovchino was allegedly struck by a drone, and part of a rocket fell into the garden of a home in the village of Antonovka. Authorities claimed to have full control of the villages and said they were hunting the "terrorists" involved in the incursion. READ MORE SUN STORIES In March, Putin accused Ukraine of launching a terror attack after members of the Legion crossed the border further north. However footage showing it was a stunt by anti-Kremlin Russians waving flags for the camera. </document> <category> URW: Speculating war outcomes: Russian army is collapsing </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Several paragraphs underline Russian army's inability to control the situation within the border of the Russian Federation, underlining that military operations are failing

EN_UA_015962.txt

URW: Speculating war outcomes

URW: Speculating war outcomes: Russian army is collapsing

The text presents a difficult situation for Russian troops that have to face a military incursion in Russian territories. Several paragraphs depict the situation as uncertain and confused, indicating that Russian military is struggling to control the situation.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Dramatic moment anti-Putin troops ‘INVADE Russia in tank and drone assault across border before seizing village’ DRAMATIC video shows a tank storming across the border from Ukraine into Russia today as anti-Putin soldiers claimed to have seized villages. Drones were also reportedly used in the "invasion" as explosions rang out along the frontier in the Belgorod region - where the local governor issued a desperate "don't panic" message to residents. The governor of the Belgorod region, Vyacheslav Gladkov, told residents that to ensure safety of citizens in the region, a "counter-terrorist regime" has been introduced. Russian authorities said a "Ukrainian Army sabotage group" crossed the border and forces were "taking measures to eliminate the enemy". Ukrainian intelligence said those involved in the incursion were "solely Russian nationals". The provocative move was claimed by the Freedom of Russia Legion, a unit made up of ethnic Russian volunteers and defectors from the Russian army to fight alongside Ukraine. READ MORE IN WORLD NEWS In an unverified video today, members of the anti-Putin group posed in front of a road sign and an armoured car. They claimed: "We have again crossed the border of the Russian Federation. Russia will soon be free. "The time to fight for the freedom of Russia has come. "We want our children to grow up in peace and be free people... but that has no place in today's Putin's Russia." Most read in The Sun Armoured vehicles with Ukrainian markings were also spotted near the border, further fuelling rumours of an invasion by pro-Ukraine Russian saboteurs. Smoke was spotted in multiple locations near border checkpoints in the region, along with videos online appearing to show a Russian soldier dead inside a checkpoint building. And a helicopter was reportedly seen flying low over houses and deploying anti-missile flares in Rakitnoye, some 30 miles from the Grayvoron border crossing where the tank was spotted. One post showed a radio message urgently telling Belgorod citizens to evacuate the area. Governor Gladkov told residents earlier today: "No one is hurt, the evacuation from Shebensky district is a lie. "I urge you not to listen to enemies and not to panic." In a post on Telegram, the Freedom of Russia Legion shared a photo of a "free Russia" flag on a bridge. They said: "The first flags of free Russia met the dawn over the liberated cities. Raise the flags in your cities too. Freedom is near!" The group claimed they had taken control of Kozinka and Gora-Podol villages. Rumours spread that up to six other villages came under drone and mortar fire. The flag raised in the photo is the flag used by Russian anti-war protesters - many of whom live in eastern Ukraine - and is also displayed on the Freedom of Russia Legion's Telegram channel. It describes them as "free citizens of Russia" who are fighting against the "dictatorial regime" in Russia. Another video widely shared online appeared to show the soldiers running into the streets of the southern Belgorod region. This was followed by aerial shots of border towns showing smoke billowing from multiple buildings. Russian authorities said administrative building in the town of Golovchino was allegedly struck by a drone, and part of a rocket fell into the garden of a home in the village of Antonovka. Authorities claimed to have full control of the villages and said they were hunting the "terrorists" involved in the incursion. READ MORE SUN STORIES In March, Putin accused Ukraine of launching a terror attack after members of the Legion crossed the border further north. However footage showing it was a stunt by anti-Kremlin Russians waving flags for the camera. </document> <category> URW: Speculating war outcomes: Russian army is collapsing </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Several paragraphs claim that Russian military is weak and incompetent. Indeed, the territorial control of Russian military is questioned by Ukrainian incursions

EN_UA_015962.txt

URW: Speculating war outcomes

URW: Speculating war outcomes: Russian army is collapsing

The text presents a difficult situation for Russian troops that have to face a military incursion in Russian territories. Several paragraphs depict the situation as uncertain and confused, indicating that Russian military is struggling to control the situation.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Dramatic moment anti-Putin troops ‘INVADE Russia in tank and drone assault across border before seizing village’ DRAMATIC video shows a tank storming across the border from Ukraine into Russia today as anti-Putin soldiers claimed to have seized villages. Drones were also reportedly used in the "invasion" as explosions rang out along the frontier in the Belgorod region - where the local governor issued a desperate "don't panic" message to residents. The governor of the Belgorod region, Vyacheslav Gladkov, told residents that to ensure safety of citizens in the region, a "counter-terrorist regime" has been introduced. Russian authorities said a "Ukrainian Army sabotage group" crossed the border and forces were "taking measures to eliminate the enemy". Ukrainian intelligence said those involved in the incursion were "solely Russian nationals". The provocative move was claimed by the Freedom of Russia Legion, a unit made up of ethnic Russian volunteers and defectors from the Russian army to fight alongside Ukraine. READ MORE IN WORLD NEWS In an unverified video today, members of the anti-Putin group posed in front of a road sign and an armoured car. They claimed: "We have again crossed the border of the Russian Federation. Russia will soon be free. "The time to fight for the freedom of Russia has come. "We want our children to grow up in peace and be free people... but that has no place in today's Putin's Russia." Most read in The Sun Armoured vehicles with Ukrainian markings were also spotted near the border, further fuelling rumours of an invasion by pro-Ukraine Russian saboteurs. Smoke was spotted in multiple locations near border checkpoints in the region, along with videos online appearing to show a Russian soldier dead inside a checkpoint building. And a helicopter was reportedly seen flying low over houses and deploying anti-missile flares in Rakitnoye, some 30 miles from the Grayvoron border crossing where the tank was spotted. One post showed a radio message urgently telling Belgorod citizens to evacuate the area. Governor Gladkov told residents earlier today: "No one is hurt, the evacuation from Shebensky district is a lie. "I urge you not to listen to enemies and not to panic." In a post on Telegram, the Freedom of Russia Legion shared a photo of a "free Russia" flag on a bridge. They said: "The first flags of free Russia met the dawn over the liberated cities. Raise the flags in your cities too. Freedom is near!" The group claimed they had taken control of Kozinka and Gora-Podol villages. Rumours spread that up to six other villages came under drone and mortar fire. The flag raised in the photo is the flag used by Russian anti-war protesters - many of whom live in eastern Ukraine - and is also displayed on the Freedom of Russia Legion's Telegram channel. It describes them as "free citizens of Russia" who are fighting against the "dictatorial regime" in Russia. Another video widely shared online appeared to show the soldiers running into the streets of the southern Belgorod region. This was followed by aerial shots of border towns showing smoke billowing from multiple buildings. Russian authorities said administrative building in the town of Golovchino was allegedly struck by a drone, and part of a rocket fell into the garden of a home in the village of Antonovka. Authorities claimed to have full control of the villages and said they were hunting the "terrorists" involved in the incursion. READ MORE SUN STORIES In March, Putin accused Ukraine of launching a terror attack after members of the Legion crossed the border further north. However footage showing it was a stunt by anti-Kremlin Russians waving flags for the camera. </document> <category> URW: Speculating war outcomes: Russian army is collapsing </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Throughout several paragraphs, the author suggest that the Russian army is losing control of its territory. The alleged attack of a pro-Ukrainian group on Russian soil is presented as an opportunity to speculate on the weaknesses of the military force.

EN_UA_015962.txt

URW: Speculating war outcomes

URW: Speculating war outcomes: Russian army is collapsing

The text presents a difficult situation for Russian troops that have to face a military incursion in Russian territories. Several paragraphs depict the situation as uncertain and confused, indicating that Russian military is struggling to control the situation.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> I was a KGB spy along side Putin and he IS using body doubles – these simple signs are a dead giveaway that he’s a fake A FORMER spy alleges a body double stands in for Vladimir Putin at key events – and has revealed what he says are the tell-tale signs. Sergei Zhirnov claims to have served alongside the Russian tyrant in the KGB intelligence service of the former Soviet Union, which is now known as the FSB. Zhirnov said he had believed until now that claims of Putin using doppelgangers were “conspiracy theories”. But he has now changed his mind, citing a speech made by a “skinny” and coughing Putin on February 21 and contrasting it with an appearance at a pro-war concert next day in Moscow as evidence. Footage highlights him waving his hands around and repeatedly touching his nose, not traits especially common with Putin. Zhirnov told Ukrainian TV that “a totally different Putin pops up” with “a wider face as if he bloated in 24 hours”. READ MORE ON VLADIMIR PUTIN "He has a totally different shape of eye orbits, a totally different head, absolutely different wrinkles - a different voice.” Far from shunning people, perhaps to avoid Covid, he was “almost kissing and hugging everyone”. His allegation comes as a video shows an unusually exuberant Russian president at a helicopter plant in Siberia. Zhirnov is now exiled in France and was a former classmate of Putin at KGB Red Flag Institute, a spy training centre. Most read in The Sun The claim Putin uses a body double has also been made by the head of Ukrainian military intelligence. Major General Kyrylo Budanov claimed the body doubles are used to hide Putin’s loss of control in the Kremlin. He claimed Ukrainian secret services detected Putin body doubles standing in for him on a number of "special occasions" in the past, but this had become "usual practice" now "We know specifically about three people that keep appearing, but how many there are, we don't know," Budanov said. "They all had plastic surgery to look alike." The spy chief alleged all the doubles had surgery but said the one thing that gives them away is their height. “It's visible in videos and pictures. Also gesturing, body language and earlobes, since they are unique for every person." The claim that Putin uses body doubles is also regularly made by the General SVR Telegram and YouTube channel, which claims to be run by a Kremlin insider. Most experts dismiss such claims as absurd and far-fetched, though several noticed Putin’s unusually buoyant mood in Siberia, compared to recent public appearances in Moscow. One claim was that Putin had had an extra dose of medicine. It has been alleged body doubles were used by former Soviet leaders Josef Stalin and Leonid Brezhnev. Putin three years ago admitted that officials had considered using doubles, but he claimed the idea was rejected. "I discarded the idea of any doubles,” he said. He admitted the idea came up in the early 2000s when Russia was hit by terrorist attacks. It was suggested a lookalike should take his place at events where the head of state might be at risk, he said. READ MORE SUN STORIES “This was during the toughest time of our war against terrorism.” </document> <category> URW: Hidden plots by secret schemes of powerful groups </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The article presents multiple paragraphs in which secret schemes and plots are attributed to the Kremlin. According to the article, Putin's loss of control in the Kremlin is hidden behind the use of doubles as well as the use of medications

EN_UA_013344.txt

URW: Hidden plots by secret schemes of powerful groups

none

The whole text fosters the narrative of Putin using doubles, speculating on the reasons. Paragraphs address the health of Vladimir Putin as well as the stability of the Russian government mentioning conspiracy theories.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> I was a KGB spy along side Putin and he IS using body doubles – these simple signs are a dead giveaway that he’s a fake A FORMER spy alleges a body double stands in for Vladimir Putin at key events – and has revealed what he says are the tell-tale signs. Sergei Zhirnov claims to have served alongside the Russian tyrant in the KGB intelligence service of the former Soviet Union, which is now known as the FSB. Zhirnov said he had believed until now that claims of Putin using doppelgangers were “conspiracy theories”. But he has now changed his mind, citing a speech made by a “skinny” and coughing Putin on February 21 and contrasting it with an appearance at a pro-war concert next day in Moscow as evidence. Footage highlights him waving his hands around and repeatedly touching his nose, not traits especially common with Putin. Zhirnov told Ukrainian TV that “a totally different Putin pops up” with “a wider face as if he bloated in 24 hours”. READ MORE ON VLADIMIR PUTIN "He has a totally different shape of eye orbits, a totally different head, absolutely different wrinkles - a different voice.” Far from shunning people, perhaps to avoid Covid, he was “almost kissing and hugging everyone”. His allegation comes as a video shows an unusually exuberant Russian president at a helicopter plant in Siberia. Zhirnov is now exiled in France and was a former classmate of Putin at KGB Red Flag Institute, a spy training centre. Most read in The Sun The claim Putin uses a body double has also been made by the head of Ukrainian military intelligence. Major General Kyrylo Budanov claimed the body doubles are used to hide Putin’s loss of control in the Kremlin. He claimed Ukrainian secret services detected Putin body doubles standing in for him on a number of "special occasions" in the past, but this had become "usual practice" now "We know specifically about three people that keep appearing, but how many there are, we don't know," Budanov said. "They all had plastic surgery to look alike." The spy chief alleged all the doubles had surgery but said the one thing that gives them away is their height. “It's visible in videos and pictures. Also gesturing, body language and earlobes, since they are unique for every person." The claim that Putin uses body doubles is also regularly made by the General SVR Telegram and YouTube channel, which claims to be run by a Kremlin insider. Most experts dismiss such claims as absurd and far-fetched, though several noticed Putin’s unusually buoyant mood in Siberia, compared to recent public appearances in Moscow. One claim was that Putin had had an extra dose of medicine. It has been alleged body doubles were used by former Soviet leaders Josef Stalin and Leonid Brezhnev. Putin three years ago admitted that officials had considered using doubles, but he claimed the idea was rejected. "I discarded the idea of any doubles,” he said. He admitted the idea came up in the early 2000s when Russia was hit by terrorist attacks. It was suggested a lookalike should take his place at events where the head of state might be at risk, he said. READ MORE SUN STORIES “This was during the toughest time of our war against terrorism.” </document> <category> URW: Hidden plots by secret schemes of powerful groups </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text reports that Vladimir Putin uses doubles and body doubles. It says that this is a proof of his bad situation.

EN_UA_013344.txt

URW: Hidden plots by secret schemes of powerful groups

none

The whole text fosters the narrative of Putin using doubles, speculating on the reasons. Paragraphs address the health of Vladimir Putin as well as the stability of the Russian government mentioning conspiracy theories.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> I was a KGB spy along side Putin and he IS using body doubles – these simple signs are a dead giveaway that he’s a fake A FORMER spy alleges a body double stands in for Vladimir Putin at key events – and has revealed what he says are the tell-tale signs. Sergei Zhirnov claims to have served alongside the Russian tyrant in the KGB intelligence service of the former Soviet Union, which is now known as the FSB. Zhirnov said he had believed until now that claims of Putin using doppelgangers were “conspiracy theories”. But he has now changed his mind, citing a speech made by a “skinny” and coughing Putin on February 21 and contrasting it with an appearance at a pro-war concert next day in Moscow as evidence. Footage highlights him waving his hands around and repeatedly touching his nose, not traits especially common with Putin. Zhirnov told Ukrainian TV that “a totally different Putin pops up” with “a wider face as if he bloated in 24 hours”. READ MORE ON VLADIMIR PUTIN "He has a totally different shape of eye orbits, a totally different head, absolutely different wrinkles - a different voice.” Far from shunning people, perhaps to avoid Covid, he was “almost kissing and hugging everyone”. His allegation comes as a video shows an unusually exuberant Russian president at a helicopter plant in Siberia. Zhirnov is now exiled in France and was a former classmate of Putin at KGB Red Flag Institute, a spy training centre. Most read in The Sun The claim Putin uses a body double has also been made by the head of Ukrainian military intelligence. Major General Kyrylo Budanov claimed the body doubles are used to hide Putin’s loss of control in the Kremlin. He claimed Ukrainian secret services detected Putin body doubles standing in for him on a number of "special occasions" in the past, but this had become "usual practice" now "We know specifically about three people that keep appearing, but how many there are, we don't know," Budanov said. "They all had plastic surgery to look alike." The spy chief alleged all the doubles had surgery but said the one thing that gives them away is their height. “It's visible in videos and pictures. Also gesturing, body language and earlobes, since they are unique for every person." The claim that Putin uses body doubles is also regularly made by the General SVR Telegram and YouTube channel, which claims to be run by a Kremlin insider. Most experts dismiss such claims as absurd and far-fetched, though several noticed Putin’s unusually buoyant mood in Siberia, compared to recent public appearances in Moscow. One claim was that Putin had had an extra dose of medicine. It has been alleged body doubles were used by former Soviet leaders Josef Stalin and Leonid Brezhnev. Putin three years ago admitted that officials had considered using doubles, but he claimed the idea was rejected. "I discarded the idea of any doubles,” he said. He admitted the idea came up in the early 2000s when Russia was hit by terrorist attacks. It was suggested a lookalike should take his place at events where the head of state might be at risk, he said. READ MORE SUN STORIES “This was during the toughest time of our war against terrorism.” </document> <category> URW: Hidden plots by secret schemes of powerful groups </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Multiple paragraphs suggests that Vladimir Putin uses doubles in public events. In doing so, they argue, he hides the fact he's losing control of the Kremlin.

EN_UA_013344.txt

URW: Hidden plots by secret schemes of powerful groups

none

The whole text fosters the narrative of Putin using doubles, speculating on the reasons. Paragraphs address the health of Vladimir Putin as well as the stability of the Russian government mentioning conspiracy theories.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> I was a KGB spy along side Putin and he IS using body doubles – these simple signs are a dead giveaway that he’s a fake A FORMER spy alleges a body double stands in for Vladimir Putin at key events – and has revealed what he says are the tell-tale signs. Sergei Zhirnov claims to have served alongside the Russian tyrant in the KGB intelligence service of the former Soviet Union, which is now known as the FSB. Zhirnov said he had believed until now that claims of Putin using doppelgangers were “conspiracy theories”. But he has now changed his mind, citing a speech made by a “skinny” and coughing Putin on February 21 and contrasting it with an appearance at a pro-war concert next day in Moscow as evidence. Footage highlights him waving his hands around and repeatedly touching his nose, not traits especially common with Putin. Zhirnov told Ukrainian TV that “a totally different Putin pops up” with “a wider face as if he bloated in 24 hours”. READ MORE ON VLADIMIR PUTIN "He has a totally different shape of eye orbits, a totally different head, absolutely different wrinkles - a different voice.” Far from shunning people, perhaps to avoid Covid, he was “almost kissing and hugging everyone”. His allegation comes as a video shows an unusually exuberant Russian president at a helicopter plant in Siberia. Zhirnov is now exiled in France and was a former classmate of Putin at KGB Red Flag Institute, a spy training centre. Most read in The Sun The claim Putin uses a body double has also been made by the head of Ukrainian military intelligence. Major General Kyrylo Budanov claimed the body doubles are used to hide Putin’s loss of control in the Kremlin. He claimed Ukrainian secret services detected Putin body doubles standing in for him on a number of "special occasions" in the past, but this had become "usual practice" now "We know specifically about three people that keep appearing, but how many there are, we don't know," Budanov said. "They all had plastic surgery to look alike." The spy chief alleged all the doubles had surgery but said the one thing that gives them away is their height. “It's visible in videos and pictures. Also gesturing, body language and earlobes, since they are unique for every person." The claim that Putin uses body doubles is also regularly made by the General SVR Telegram and YouTube channel, which claims to be run by a Kremlin insider. Most experts dismiss such claims as absurd and far-fetched, though several noticed Putin’s unusually buoyant mood in Siberia, compared to recent public appearances in Moscow. One claim was that Putin had had an extra dose of medicine. It has been alleged body doubles were used by former Soviet leaders Josef Stalin and Leonid Brezhnev. Putin three years ago admitted that officials had considered using doubles, but he claimed the idea was rejected. "I discarded the idea of any doubles,” he said. He admitted the idea came up in the early 2000s when Russia was hit by terrorist attacks. It was suggested a lookalike should take his place at events where the head of state might be at risk, he said. READ MORE SUN STORIES “This was during the toughest time of our war against terrorism.” </document> <category> URW: Hidden plots by secret schemes of powerful groups </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text repeatedly suggests that Putin uses doubles to hide his public appearances. It mentions several occasions in the context of health problems, suggesting that Putin might not be the same person we see on TV and public events.

EN_UA_013344.txt

URW: Hidden plots by secret schemes of powerful groups

none

The whole text fosters the narrative of Putin using doubles, speculating on the reasons. Paragraphs address the health of Vladimir Putin as well as the stability of the Russian government mentioning conspiracy theories.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> I was a KGB spy along side Putin and he IS using body doubles – these simple signs are a dead giveaway that he’s a fake A FORMER spy alleges a body double stands in for Vladimir Putin at key events – and has revealed what he says are the tell-tale signs. Sergei Zhirnov claims to have served alongside the Russian tyrant in the KGB intelligence service of the former Soviet Union, which is now known as the FSB. Zhirnov said he had believed until now that claims of Putin using doppelgangers were “conspiracy theories”. But he has now changed his mind, citing a speech made by a “skinny” and coughing Putin on February 21 and contrasting it with an appearance at a pro-war concert next day in Moscow as evidence. Footage highlights him waving his hands around and repeatedly touching his nose, not traits especially common with Putin. Zhirnov told Ukrainian TV that “a totally different Putin pops up” with “a wider face as if he bloated in 24 hours”. READ MORE ON VLADIMIR PUTIN "He has a totally different shape of eye orbits, a totally different head, absolutely different wrinkles - a different voice.” Far from shunning people, perhaps to avoid Covid, he was “almost kissing and hugging everyone”. His allegation comes as a video shows an unusually exuberant Russian president at a helicopter plant in Siberia. Zhirnov is now exiled in France and was a former classmate of Putin at KGB Red Flag Institute, a spy training centre. Most read in The Sun The claim Putin uses a body double has also been made by the head of Ukrainian military intelligence. Major General Kyrylo Budanov claimed the body doubles are used to hide Putin’s loss of control in the Kremlin. He claimed Ukrainian secret services detected Putin body doubles standing in for him on a number of "special occasions" in the past, but this had become "usual practice" now "We know specifically about three people that keep appearing, but how many there are, we don't know," Budanov said. "They all had plastic surgery to look alike." The spy chief alleged all the doubles had surgery but said the one thing that gives them away is their height. “It's visible in videos and pictures. Also gesturing, body language and earlobes, since they are unique for every person." The claim that Putin uses body doubles is also regularly made by the General SVR Telegram and YouTube channel, which claims to be run by a Kremlin insider. Most experts dismiss such claims as absurd and far-fetched, though several noticed Putin’s unusually buoyant mood in Siberia, compared to recent public appearances in Moscow. One claim was that Putin had had an extra dose of medicine. It has been alleged body doubles were used by former Soviet leaders Josef Stalin and Leonid Brezhnev. Putin three years ago admitted that officials had considered using doubles, but he claimed the idea was rejected. "I discarded the idea of any doubles,” he said. He admitted the idea came up in the early 2000s when Russia was hit by terrorist attacks. It was suggested a lookalike should take his place at events where the head of state might be at risk, he said. READ MORE SUN STORIES “This was during the toughest time of our war against terrorism.” </document> <category> URW: Hidden plots by secret schemes of powerful groups </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Article claiming Putin uses doubles. Suggests Putin uses body doubles to hide loss of control in the Kremlin.

EN_UA_013344.txt

URW: Hidden plots by secret schemes of powerful groups

none

The whole text fosters the narrative of Putin using doubles, speculating on the reasons. Paragraphs address the health of Vladimir Putin as well as the stability of the Russian government mentioning conspiracy theories.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> A Former Ukrainian MP Blew The Whistle On Burisma's Connections To Terrorism A Former Ukrainian MP Blew The Whistle On Burisma's Connections To Terrorism Authored by Andrew Korybko via Substack, Former Ukrainian MP Andrey Derkach, who’s reviled by the Biden Administration for sharing dirt about Hunter Biden’s Burisma corruption scandal with Trump’s former lawyer Rudy Giuliani ahead of the 2020 elections, just gave a very important interview to Belarus’ BelTA where be blew the whistle even louder. According to him, the $6 million bribe that was paid in cash to shut down the investigation into the First Son’s scandal eventually found its way to the Ukrainian Armed Forces and its military-intelligence agency. Derkach claimed to have proof of the secret court order that divided these funds between those two, with the first investing its portion into building up their country’s drone army while the second financed terrorist attacks like the assassination of Darya Dugina, which he specifically mentioned in the interview. These allegations expand upon the ones that he shared earlier this year regarding the real-world impact of Hunter’s corruption scandal, which were analyzed here at the time. On the subject of Ukrainian assassinations and terrorism, Derkach said that the CIA and FBI actually condone these actions despite their public claims to the contrary, but he warned that this immoral policy will inevitably ricochet into the US itself. In particular, he cited FBI chief Christopher Wray’s testimony to Congress last April where he said that law enforcement officials fear that Crocus-like attacks are presently being plotted against their country. About that, it shouldn’t be forgotten that Ukraine’s military-intelligence service GUR is the chief suspect of Russia’s investigation into what became one of the worst terrorist attacks in its history, thus meaning that the portion of Burisma’s $6 million bribe that made its way into their hands likely financed part of it. In other words, the third-order effect of Hunter’s corruption scandal is that it was partially responsible for the brutal murder of innocent civilians halfway across the world some years later. That’s already scandalous enough, but Derkach shared even more details about the other indirect consequences of this cover-up into the First Son’s illicit activities, adding that some GUR-linked figures have been connected to the Western narrative about September 2022’s Nord Stream terrorist attack. He regards that story as a distraction from the US’ complicity, the view of which was elaborated upon here at the time that it entered the discourse, but lauded the CIA for the lengths it went to cover up its role. In his view, the CIA might very well have sent a highly trained Ukrainian diving team to the Baltic Sea exactly as the Western media reported, though only to plant fake bombs. In his words, “when a cover story is made, it is done quite well. We shouldn’t belittle the experience of the CIA or the experience of MI6 in preparing cover operations. They have quite a lot of experience in using proxies, in using cover stories to form a certain position in order to dodge responsibility. This is actually what happened.” Looking forward, Derkach expects Ukraine to attempt more terrorist attacks against Russia, which the US public is being preconditioned to accept via the CIA’s various leaks to the media. While many might lay the blame for all this on Zelensky’s lap, Derkach believes that it’s actually his Chief of Staff Andrey Yermak who’s running the show, albeit as a Western puppet. Nevertheless, he’s also convinced that the West is indeed preparing to formally replace Zelensky, but doesn’t yet know when or with whom. Altogether, the importance of Derkach’s interview is that he’s a former veteran Ukrainian politician who still retains a lot of sources inside the regime, having served in the Rada for a whopping 22 years from 1998-2020. While his homeland charged him with treason after he fled to Russia in early 2022, which followed the US charging him with election meddling on behalf of that country in September 2020, the argument can be made that these are politically driven attempts to intimidate a top whistleblower. The dirt that Derkach shared about Hunter’s Burisma corruption scandal, not to mention its newly revealed third-order effects that led to the brutal killing of civilians halfway across the world after part of his company’s bribe made its way into GUR’s hands, made him an enemy of the US Government. They and their Ukrainian proxies will therefore always try to discredit him with sensational allegations, but everyone would do well to listen to what he says and then make up their own minds about it. </document> <category> URW: Discrediting Ukraine: Ukraine is a hub for criminal activities </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Throughout multiple paragraphs, the author calls Ukraine corrupt and suggests that it is even behind terrorist activities, which have impacted the US directly and indirectly.

EN_UA_104859.txt

URW: Discrediting Ukraine

URW: Discrediting Ukraine: Ukraine is a hub for criminal activities

The text present multiple paragraphs accusing Ukraine of criminal and terrorist activites against Russia, including the assassination of Daria Dugina, the Crocus Hall attack, and the sabotage of Nord Stream 2. It also accuses the US secret services of financing these activities.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> A Former Ukrainian MP Blew The Whistle On Burisma's Connections To Terrorism A Former Ukrainian MP Blew The Whistle On Burisma's Connections To Terrorism Authored by Andrew Korybko via Substack, Former Ukrainian MP Andrey Derkach, who’s reviled by the Biden Administration for sharing dirt about Hunter Biden’s Burisma corruption scandal with Trump’s former lawyer Rudy Giuliani ahead of the 2020 elections, just gave a very important interview to Belarus’ BelTA where be blew the whistle even louder. According to him, the $6 million bribe that was paid in cash to shut down the investigation into the First Son’s scandal eventually found its way to the Ukrainian Armed Forces and its military-intelligence agency. Derkach claimed to have proof of the secret court order that divided these funds between those two, with the first investing its portion into building up their country’s drone army while the second financed terrorist attacks like the assassination of Darya Dugina, which he specifically mentioned in the interview. These allegations expand upon the ones that he shared earlier this year regarding the real-world impact of Hunter’s corruption scandal, which were analyzed here at the time. On the subject of Ukrainian assassinations and terrorism, Derkach said that the CIA and FBI actually condone these actions despite their public claims to the contrary, but he warned that this immoral policy will inevitably ricochet into the US itself. In particular, he cited FBI chief Christopher Wray’s testimony to Congress last April where he said that law enforcement officials fear that Crocus-like attacks are presently being plotted against their country. About that, it shouldn’t be forgotten that Ukraine’s military-intelligence service GUR is the chief suspect of Russia’s investigation into what became one of the worst terrorist attacks in its history, thus meaning that the portion of Burisma’s $6 million bribe that made its way into their hands likely financed part of it. In other words, the third-order effect of Hunter’s corruption scandal is that it was partially responsible for the brutal murder of innocent civilians halfway across the world some years later. That’s already scandalous enough, but Derkach shared even more details about the other indirect consequences of this cover-up into the First Son’s illicit activities, adding that some GUR-linked figures have been connected to the Western narrative about September 2022’s Nord Stream terrorist attack. He regards that story as a distraction from the US’ complicity, the view of which was elaborated upon here at the time that it entered the discourse, but lauded the CIA for the lengths it went to cover up its role. In his view, the CIA might very well have sent a highly trained Ukrainian diving team to the Baltic Sea exactly as the Western media reported, though only to plant fake bombs. In his words, “when a cover story is made, it is done quite well. We shouldn’t belittle the experience of the CIA or the experience of MI6 in preparing cover operations. They have quite a lot of experience in using proxies, in using cover stories to form a certain position in order to dodge responsibility. This is actually what happened.” Looking forward, Derkach expects Ukraine to attempt more terrorist attacks against Russia, which the US public is being preconditioned to accept via the CIA’s various leaks to the media. While many might lay the blame for all this on Zelensky’s lap, Derkach believes that it’s actually his Chief of Staff Andrey Yermak who’s running the show, albeit as a Western puppet. Nevertheless, he’s also convinced that the West is indeed preparing to formally replace Zelensky, but doesn’t yet know when or with whom. Altogether, the importance of Derkach’s interview is that he’s a former veteran Ukrainian politician who still retains a lot of sources inside the regime, having served in the Rada for a whopping 22 years from 1998-2020. While his homeland charged him with treason after he fled to Russia in early 2022, which followed the US charging him with election meddling on behalf of that country in September 2020, the argument can be made that these are politically driven attempts to intimidate a top whistleblower. The dirt that Derkach shared about Hunter’s Burisma corruption scandal, not to mention its newly revealed third-order effects that led to the brutal killing of civilians halfway across the world after part of his company’s bribe made its way into GUR’s hands, made him an enemy of the US Government. They and their Ukrainian proxies will therefore always try to discredit him with sensational allegations, but everyone would do well to listen to what he says and then make up their own minds about it. </document> <category> URW: Discrediting Ukraine: Ukraine is a hub for criminal activities </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Article is reporting allegations by former Ukrainian politician Andrey Derkach claiming that Ukrainian intelligence service has been financing terrorist activities and assassination operations after it received money from corruption scheme involving Hunter Biden. Article is portraying Ukraine as a hub for criminal activities by underlining that a Ukrainian intelligence service has been implicated in one of the worst terrorist attack in Russia's history, while also suggesting that CIA is complicit.

EN_UA_104859.txt

URW: Discrediting Ukraine

URW: Discrediting Ukraine: Ukraine is a hub for criminal activities

The text present multiple paragraphs accusing Ukraine of criminal and terrorist activites against Russia, including the assassination of Daria Dugina, the Crocus Hall attack, and the sabotage of Nord Stream 2. It also accuses the US secret services of financing these activities.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> A Former Ukrainian MP Blew The Whistle On Burisma's Connections To Terrorism A Former Ukrainian MP Blew The Whistle On Burisma's Connections To Terrorism Authored by Andrew Korybko via Substack, Former Ukrainian MP Andrey Derkach, who’s reviled by the Biden Administration for sharing dirt about Hunter Biden’s Burisma corruption scandal with Trump’s former lawyer Rudy Giuliani ahead of the 2020 elections, just gave a very important interview to Belarus’ BelTA where be blew the whistle even louder. According to him, the $6 million bribe that was paid in cash to shut down the investigation into the First Son’s scandal eventually found its way to the Ukrainian Armed Forces and its military-intelligence agency. Derkach claimed to have proof of the secret court order that divided these funds between those two, with the first investing its portion into building up their country’s drone army while the second financed terrorist attacks like the assassination of Darya Dugina, which he specifically mentioned in the interview. These allegations expand upon the ones that he shared earlier this year regarding the real-world impact of Hunter’s corruption scandal, which were analyzed here at the time. On the subject of Ukrainian assassinations and terrorism, Derkach said that the CIA and FBI actually condone these actions despite their public claims to the contrary, but he warned that this immoral policy will inevitably ricochet into the US itself. In particular, he cited FBI chief Christopher Wray’s testimony to Congress last April where he said that law enforcement officials fear that Crocus-like attacks are presently being plotted against their country. About that, it shouldn’t be forgotten that Ukraine’s military-intelligence service GUR is the chief suspect of Russia’s investigation into what became one of the worst terrorist attacks in its history, thus meaning that the portion of Burisma’s $6 million bribe that made its way into their hands likely financed part of it. In other words, the third-order effect of Hunter’s corruption scandal is that it was partially responsible for the brutal murder of innocent civilians halfway across the world some years later. That’s already scandalous enough, but Derkach shared even more details about the other indirect consequences of this cover-up into the First Son’s illicit activities, adding that some GUR-linked figures have been connected to the Western narrative about September 2022’s Nord Stream terrorist attack. He regards that story as a distraction from the US’ complicity, the view of which was elaborated upon here at the time that it entered the discourse, but lauded the CIA for the lengths it went to cover up its role. In his view, the CIA might very well have sent a highly trained Ukrainian diving team to the Baltic Sea exactly as the Western media reported, though only to plant fake bombs. In his words, “when a cover story is made, it is done quite well. We shouldn’t belittle the experience of the CIA or the experience of MI6 in preparing cover operations. They have quite a lot of experience in using proxies, in using cover stories to form a certain position in order to dodge responsibility. This is actually what happened.” Looking forward, Derkach expects Ukraine to attempt more terrorist attacks against Russia, which the US public is being preconditioned to accept via the CIA’s various leaks to the media. While many might lay the blame for all this on Zelensky’s lap, Derkach believes that it’s actually his Chief of Staff Andrey Yermak who’s running the show, albeit as a Western puppet. Nevertheless, he’s also convinced that the West is indeed preparing to formally replace Zelensky, but doesn’t yet know when or with whom. Altogether, the importance of Derkach’s interview is that he’s a former veteran Ukrainian politician who still retains a lot of sources inside the regime, having served in the Rada for a whopping 22 years from 1998-2020. While his homeland charged him with treason after he fled to Russia in early 2022, which followed the US charging him with election meddling on behalf of that country in September 2020, the argument can be made that these are politically driven attempts to intimidate a top whistleblower. The dirt that Derkach shared about Hunter’s Burisma corruption scandal, not to mention its newly revealed third-order effects that led to the brutal killing of civilians halfway across the world after part of his company’s bribe made its way into GUR’s hands, made him an enemy of the US Government. They and their Ukrainian proxies will therefore always try to discredit him with sensational allegations, but everyone would do well to listen to what he says and then make up their own minds about it. </document> <category> URW: Discrediting Ukraine: Ukraine is a hub for criminal activities </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Article accusing Ukraine and Zelensky's regime of being involved in criminal activities, such as drug trafficking, assassinations, and being used by the US for their benefit.

EN_UA_104859.txt

URW: Discrediting Ukraine

URW: Discrediting Ukraine: Ukraine is a hub for criminal activities

The text present multiple paragraphs accusing Ukraine of criminal and terrorist activites against Russia, including the assassination of Daria Dugina, the Crocus Hall attack, and the sabotage of Nord Stream 2. It also accuses the US secret services of financing these activities.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> A Former Ukrainian MP Blew The Whistle On Burisma's Connections To Terrorism A Former Ukrainian MP Blew The Whistle On Burisma's Connections To Terrorism Authored by Andrew Korybko via Substack, Former Ukrainian MP Andrey Derkach, who’s reviled by the Biden Administration for sharing dirt about Hunter Biden’s Burisma corruption scandal with Trump’s former lawyer Rudy Giuliani ahead of the 2020 elections, just gave a very important interview to Belarus’ BelTA where be blew the whistle even louder. According to him, the $6 million bribe that was paid in cash to shut down the investigation into the First Son’s scandal eventually found its way to the Ukrainian Armed Forces and its military-intelligence agency. Derkach claimed to have proof of the secret court order that divided these funds between those two, with the first investing its portion into building up their country’s drone army while the second financed terrorist attacks like the assassination of Darya Dugina, which he specifically mentioned in the interview. These allegations expand upon the ones that he shared earlier this year regarding the real-world impact of Hunter’s corruption scandal, which were analyzed here at the time. On the subject of Ukrainian assassinations and terrorism, Derkach said that the CIA and FBI actually condone these actions despite their public claims to the contrary, but he warned that this immoral policy will inevitably ricochet into the US itself. In particular, he cited FBI chief Christopher Wray’s testimony to Congress last April where he said that law enforcement officials fear that Crocus-like attacks are presently being plotted against their country. About that, it shouldn’t be forgotten that Ukraine’s military-intelligence service GUR is the chief suspect of Russia’s investigation into what became one of the worst terrorist attacks in its history, thus meaning that the portion of Burisma’s $6 million bribe that made its way into their hands likely financed part of it. In other words, the third-order effect of Hunter’s corruption scandal is that it was partially responsible for the brutal murder of innocent civilians halfway across the world some years later. That’s already scandalous enough, but Derkach shared even more details about the other indirect consequences of this cover-up into the First Son’s illicit activities, adding that some GUR-linked figures have been connected to the Western narrative about September 2022’s Nord Stream terrorist attack. He regards that story as a distraction from the US’ complicity, the view of which was elaborated upon here at the time that it entered the discourse, but lauded the CIA for the lengths it went to cover up its role. In his view, the CIA might very well have sent a highly trained Ukrainian diving team to the Baltic Sea exactly as the Western media reported, though only to plant fake bombs. In his words, “when a cover story is made, it is done quite well. We shouldn’t belittle the experience of the CIA or the experience of MI6 in preparing cover operations. They have quite a lot of experience in using proxies, in using cover stories to form a certain position in order to dodge responsibility. This is actually what happened.” Looking forward, Derkach expects Ukraine to attempt more terrorist attacks against Russia, which the US public is being preconditioned to accept via the CIA’s various leaks to the media. While many might lay the blame for all this on Zelensky’s lap, Derkach believes that it’s actually his Chief of Staff Andrey Yermak who’s running the show, albeit as a Western puppet. Nevertheless, he’s also convinced that the West is indeed preparing to formally replace Zelensky, but doesn’t yet know when or with whom. Altogether, the importance of Derkach’s interview is that he’s a former veteran Ukrainian politician who still retains a lot of sources inside the regime, having served in the Rada for a whopping 22 years from 1998-2020. While his homeland charged him with treason after he fled to Russia in early 2022, which followed the US charging him with election meddling on behalf of that country in September 2020, the argument can be made that these are politically driven attempts to intimidate a top whistleblower. The dirt that Derkach shared about Hunter’s Burisma corruption scandal, not to mention its newly revealed third-order effects that led to the brutal killing of civilians halfway across the world after part of his company’s bribe made its way into GUR’s hands, made him an enemy of the US Government. They and their Ukrainian proxies will therefore always try to discredit him with sensational allegations, but everyone would do well to listen to what he says and then make up their own minds about it. </document> <category> URW: Discrediting Ukraine: Ukraine is a hub for criminal activities </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Throughout several paragraphs, the article reports that Ukraine is involved in illegal activities such as corruption, murder and terrorism. Ukraine is discredited as being a compromised country that can be used as a proxy by other states such as the US or Russia.

EN_UA_104859.txt

URW: Discrediting Ukraine

URW: Discrediting Ukraine: Ukraine is a hub for criminal activities

The text present multiple paragraphs accusing Ukraine of criminal and terrorist activites against Russia, including the assassination of Daria Dugina, the Crocus Hall attack, and the sabotage of Nord Stream 2. It also accuses the US secret services of financing these activities.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> A Former Ukrainian MP Blew The Whistle On Burisma's Connections To Terrorism A Former Ukrainian MP Blew The Whistle On Burisma's Connections To Terrorism Authored by Andrew Korybko via Substack, Former Ukrainian MP Andrey Derkach, who’s reviled by the Biden Administration for sharing dirt about Hunter Biden’s Burisma corruption scandal with Trump’s former lawyer Rudy Giuliani ahead of the 2020 elections, just gave a very important interview to Belarus’ BelTA where be blew the whistle even louder. According to him, the $6 million bribe that was paid in cash to shut down the investigation into the First Son’s scandal eventually found its way to the Ukrainian Armed Forces and its military-intelligence agency. Derkach claimed to have proof of the secret court order that divided these funds between those two, with the first investing its portion into building up their country’s drone army while the second financed terrorist attacks like the assassination of Darya Dugina, which he specifically mentioned in the interview. These allegations expand upon the ones that he shared earlier this year regarding the real-world impact of Hunter’s corruption scandal, which were analyzed here at the time. On the subject of Ukrainian assassinations and terrorism, Derkach said that the CIA and FBI actually condone these actions despite their public claims to the contrary, but he warned that this immoral policy will inevitably ricochet into the US itself. In particular, he cited FBI chief Christopher Wray’s testimony to Congress last April where he said that law enforcement officials fear that Crocus-like attacks are presently being plotted against their country. About that, it shouldn’t be forgotten that Ukraine’s military-intelligence service GUR is the chief suspect of Russia’s investigation into what became one of the worst terrorist attacks in its history, thus meaning that the portion of Burisma’s $6 million bribe that made its way into their hands likely financed part of it. In other words, the third-order effect of Hunter’s corruption scandal is that it was partially responsible for the brutal murder of innocent civilians halfway across the world some years later. That’s already scandalous enough, but Derkach shared even more details about the other indirect consequences of this cover-up into the First Son’s illicit activities, adding that some GUR-linked figures have been connected to the Western narrative about September 2022’s Nord Stream terrorist attack. He regards that story as a distraction from the US’ complicity, the view of which was elaborated upon here at the time that it entered the discourse, but lauded the CIA for the lengths it went to cover up its role. In his view, the CIA might very well have sent a highly trained Ukrainian diving team to the Baltic Sea exactly as the Western media reported, though only to plant fake bombs. In his words, “when a cover story is made, it is done quite well. We shouldn’t belittle the experience of the CIA or the experience of MI6 in preparing cover operations. They have quite a lot of experience in using proxies, in using cover stories to form a certain position in order to dodge responsibility. This is actually what happened.” Looking forward, Derkach expects Ukraine to attempt more terrorist attacks against Russia, which the US public is being preconditioned to accept via the CIA’s various leaks to the media. While many might lay the blame for all this on Zelensky’s lap, Derkach believes that it’s actually his Chief of Staff Andrey Yermak who’s running the show, albeit as a Western puppet. Nevertheless, he’s also convinced that the West is indeed preparing to formally replace Zelensky, but doesn’t yet know when or with whom. Altogether, the importance of Derkach’s interview is that he’s a former veteran Ukrainian politician who still retains a lot of sources inside the regime, having served in the Rada for a whopping 22 years from 1998-2020. While his homeland charged him with treason after he fled to Russia in early 2022, which followed the US charging him with election meddling on behalf of that country in September 2020, the argument can be made that these are politically driven attempts to intimidate a top whistleblower. The dirt that Derkach shared about Hunter’s Burisma corruption scandal, not to mention its newly revealed third-order effects that led to the brutal killing of civilians halfway across the world after part of his company’s bribe made its way into GUR’s hands, made him an enemy of the US Government. They and their Ukrainian proxies will therefore always try to discredit him with sensational allegations, but everyone would do well to listen to what he says and then make up their own minds about it. </document> <category> URW: Discrediting Ukraine: Ukraine is a hub for criminal activities </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text conveys a sense of criminalization of Ukraine suggesting that the country is used by US and western allies to organize and shelter criminal activities.

EN_UA_104859.txt

URW: Discrediting Ukraine

URW: Discrediting Ukraine: Ukraine is a hub for criminal activities

The text present multiple paragraphs accusing Ukraine of criminal and terrorist activites against Russia, including the assassination of Daria Dugina, the Crocus Hall attack, and the sabotage of Nord Stream 2. It also accuses the US secret services of financing these activities.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Russia threatens nukes for US, UK, Finland if NATO expands Russia threatens nukes for US, UK, Finland if NATO expands Vladimir Putin warned the president of Finland Saturday that any effort to join NATO would “negatively” affect relations between the two countries. The comments followed another Russian leader’s threat to use the Satan-2 hypersonic nuclear missile to strike Britain and Finland “in just 200 seconds” — and that the weapons could be used to hit the United States as well. As NATO foreign ministers gathered in Berlin, with discussion about potential applications from Sweden and Finland to join the Western military alliance on the agenda, Putin spoke to Finnish leader Sauli Niinisto. Nijnisto told Putin in the phone conversation that the traditionally non-aligned country “will decide to apply for NATO membership in the coming days.” Finland and Sweden, also traditionally neutral, are moving toward the applications in response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. In response, Russia cut off electricity supplies to Finland on Friday. Putin told Niinisto that Finland’s abandonment “of its traditional policy of military neutrality would be an error since there are no threats to Finland’s security,” the Kremlin said in a statement issued after the call. “Such a change in the country’s foreign policy could negatively affect Russian-Finnish relations, which had been built in the spirit of good neighborliness and partnership for many years, and were mutually beneficial.” Niinisto’s office said in a statement that he told Putin how starkly Finland’s security environment had changed after Moscow’s Feb. 24 invasion of Ukraine. The exchange came amid escalating rhetoric over the potential for NATO to expand beyond its current 30 members. “If Finland wants to join this bloc, then our goal is absolutely legitimate — to question the existence of this state. This is logical,” said Aleksey Zhuravlyov, 59, the deputy chairman of the Russian parliament’s defense committee, said in an interview with The Mirror. “The Finns in general should be grateful to Russia for their statehood, for the fact that Finland exists as a country.” “If the United States threatens our state, it’s good: here is the Sarmat [Satan-2] for you, and there will be nuclear ashes from you if you think that Russia should not exist,” he continued. “And Finland says that it is at one with the USA. Well, get in line.” The Satan-2 is a ballistic missile capable of carrying 10 to 15 nuclear warheads, with an estimated destructive power of three megatons each. Russia wouldn’t need to move nukes to its European border to carry out its threat, officials boasted. “We can hit with a Sarmat [known in the West as Satan-2] from Siberia, and even reach the UK,” he said. “And if we strike from Kaliningrad … the hypersonic’s reaching time is 200 seconds – so go ahead, guys. “On the Finnish border we will have not strategic weapons, but Kinzhal-class, one that will reach Finland in 20 seconds, or even 10 seconds.” Separately, Deputy Foreign Minister Alexander Grushko said Russia knows that NATO wants to “militarize everything within reach,” Interfax news agency reported. </document> <category> URW: Amplifying war-related fears: There is a real possibility that nuclear weapons will be employed </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Throughout multiple paragraphs, Russian officials suggest that nuclear weapons might be employed, specifically highlighting US, British and Finnish targets.

EN_UA_004209.txt

URW: Amplifying war-related fears

URW: Amplifying war-related fears: There is a real possibility that nuclear weapons will be employed

Article quoting Putin and Russian officials, claiming that they have the power to produce nuclear strikes in Western territory. The article aims to fearmonger by using detailed descriptions of Russian nuclear capabilities while keeping a writing style akin to reporting.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Russia threatens nukes for US, UK, Finland if NATO expands Russia threatens nukes for US, UK, Finland if NATO expands Vladimir Putin warned the president of Finland Saturday that any effort to join NATO would “negatively” affect relations between the two countries. The comments followed another Russian leader’s threat to use the Satan-2 hypersonic nuclear missile to strike Britain and Finland “in just 200 seconds” — and that the weapons could be used to hit the United States as well. As NATO foreign ministers gathered in Berlin, with discussion about potential applications from Sweden and Finland to join the Western military alliance on the agenda, Putin spoke to Finnish leader Sauli Niinisto. Nijnisto told Putin in the phone conversation that the traditionally non-aligned country “will decide to apply for NATO membership in the coming days.” Finland and Sweden, also traditionally neutral, are moving toward the applications in response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. In response, Russia cut off electricity supplies to Finland on Friday. Putin told Niinisto that Finland’s abandonment “of its traditional policy of military neutrality would be an error since there are no threats to Finland’s security,” the Kremlin said in a statement issued after the call. “Such a change in the country’s foreign policy could negatively affect Russian-Finnish relations, which had been built in the spirit of good neighborliness and partnership for many years, and were mutually beneficial.” Niinisto’s office said in a statement that he told Putin how starkly Finland’s security environment had changed after Moscow’s Feb. 24 invasion of Ukraine. The exchange came amid escalating rhetoric over the potential for NATO to expand beyond its current 30 members. “If Finland wants to join this bloc, then our goal is absolutely legitimate — to question the existence of this state. This is logical,” said Aleksey Zhuravlyov, 59, the deputy chairman of the Russian parliament’s defense committee, said in an interview with The Mirror. “The Finns in general should be grateful to Russia for their statehood, for the fact that Finland exists as a country.” “If the United States threatens our state, it’s good: here is the Sarmat [Satan-2] for you, and there will be nuclear ashes from you if you think that Russia should not exist,” he continued. “And Finland says that it is at one with the USA. Well, get in line.” The Satan-2 is a ballistic missile capable of carrying 10 to 15 nuclear warheads, with an estimated destructive power of three megatons each. Russia wouldn’t need to move nukes to its European border to carry out its threat, officials boasted. “We can hit with a Sarmat [known in the West as Satan-2] from Siberia, and even reach the UK,” he said. “And if we strike from Kaliningrad … the hypersonic’s reaching time is 200 seconds – so go ahead, guys. “On the Finnish border we will have not strategic weapons, but Kinzhal-class, one that will reach Finland in 20 seconds, or even 10 seconds.” Separately, Deputy Foreign Minister Alexander Grushko said Russia knows that NATO wants to “militarize everything within reach,” Interfax news agency reported. </document> <category> URW: Amplifying war-related fears: There is a real possibility that nuclear weapons will be employed </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Several passages mention that if NATO will expand Russia will consider the use of nuclear weapons, potentially also against countries which are not part of the alliance. The attempt to increase fear is evident.

EN_UA_004209.txt

URW: Amplifying war-related fears

URW: Amplifying war-related fears: There is a real possibility that nuclear weapons will be employed

Article quoting Putin and Russian officials, claiming that they have the power to produce nuclear strikes in Western territory. The article aims to fearmonger by using detailed descriptions of Russian nuclear capabilities while keeping a writing style akin to reporting.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Russia threatens nukes for US, UK, Finland if NATO expands Russia threatens nukes for US, UK, Finland if NATO expands Vladimir Putin warned the president of Finland Saturday that any effort to join NATO would “negatively” affect relations between the two countries. The comments followed another Russian leader’s threat to use the Satan-2 hypersonic nuclear missile to strike Britain and Finland “in just 200 seconds” — and that the weapons could be used to hit the United States as well. As NATO foreign ministers gathered in Berlin, with discussion about potential applications from Sweden and Finland to join the Western military alliance on the agenda, Putin spoke to Finnish leader Sauli Niinisto. Nijnisto told Putin in the phone conversation that the traditionally non-aligned country “will decide to apply for NATO membership in the coming days.” Finland and Sweden, also traditionally neutral, are moving toward the applications in response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. In response, Russia cut off electricity supplies to Finland on Friday. Putin told Niinisto that Finland’s abandonment “of its traditional policy of military neutrality would be an error since there are no threats to Finland’s security,” the Kremlin said in a statement issued after the call. “Such a change in the country’s foreign policy could negatively affect Russian-Finnish relations, which had been built in the spirit of good neighborliness and partnership for many years, and were mutually beneficial.” Niinisto’s office said in a statement that he told Putin how starkly Finland’s security environment had changed after Moscow’s Feb. 24 invasion of Ukraine. The exchange came amid escalating rhetoric over the potential for NATO to expand beyond its current 30 members. “If Finland wants to join this bloc, then our goal is absolutely legitimate — to question the existence of this state. This is logical,” said Aleksey Zhuravlyov, 59, the deputy chairman of the Russian parliament’s defense committee, said in an interview with The Mirror. “The Finns in general should be grateful to Russia for their statehood, for the fact that Finland exists as a country.” “If the United States threatens our state, it’s good: here is the Sarmat [Satan-2] for you, and there will be nuclear ashes from you if you think that Russia should not exist,” he continued. “And Finland says that it is at one with the USA. Well, get in line.” The Satan-2 is a ballistic missile capable of carrying 10 to 15 nuclear warheads, with an estimated destructive power of three megatons each. Russia wouldn’t need to move nukes to its European border to carry out its threat, officials boasted. “We can hit with a Sarmat [known in the West as Satan-2] from Siberia, and even reach the UK,” he said. “And if we strike from Kaliningrad … the hypersonic’s reaching time is 200 seconds – so go ahead, guys. “On the Finnish border we will have not strategic weapons, but Kinzhal-class, one that will reach Finland in 20 seconds, or even 10 seconds.” Separately, Deputy Foreign Minister Alexander Grushko said Russia knows that NATO wants to “militarize everything within reach,” Interfax news agency reported. </document> <category> URW: Amplifying war-related fears: There is a real possibility that nuclear weapons will be employed </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text amplifies the real possibility that nuclear weapons will be employed by Russia, claiming that Russia would be able to attack with nukes US, Finland, and UK.

EN_UA_004209.txt

URW: Amplifying war-related fears

URW: Amplifying war-related fears: There is a real possibility that nuclear weapons will be employed

Article quoting Putin and Russian officials, claiming that they have the power to produce nuclear strikes in Western territory. The article aims to fearmonger by using detailed descriptions of Russian nuclear capabilities while keeping a writing style akin to reporting.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Russia threatens nukes for US, UK, Finland if NATO expands Russia threatens nukes for US, UK, Finland if NATO expands Vladimir Putin warned the president of Finland Saturday that any effort to join NATO would “negatively” affect relations between the two countries. The comments followed another Russian leader’s threat to use the Satan-2 hypersonic nuclear missile to strike Britain and Finland “in just 200 seconds” — and that the weapons could be used to hit the United States as well. As NATO foreign ministers gathered in Berlin, with discussion about potential applications from Sweden and Finland to join the Western military alliance on the agenda, Putin spoke to Finnish leader Sauli Niinisto. Nijnisto told Putin in the phone conversation that the traditionally non-aligned country “will decide to apply for NATO membership in the coming days.” Finland and Sweden, also traditionally neutral, are moving toward the applications in response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. In response, Russia cut off electricity supplies to Finland on Friday. Putin told Niinisto that Finland’s abandonment “of its traditional policy of military neutrality would be an error since there are no threats to Finland’s security,” the Kremlin said in a statement issued after the call. “Such a change in the country’s foreign policy could negatively affect Russian-Finnish relations, which had been built in the spirit of good neighborliness and partnership for many years, and were mutually beneficial.” Niinisto’s office said in a statement that he told Putin how starkly Finland’s security environment had changed after Moscow’s Feb. 24 invasion of Ukraine. The exchange came amid escalating rhetoric over the potential for NATO to expand beyond its current 30 members. “If Finland wants to join this bloc, then our goal is absolutely legitimate — to question the existence of this state. This is logical,” said Aleksey Zhuravlyov, 59, the deputy chairman of the Russian parliament’s defense committee, said in an interview with The Mirror. “The Finns in general should be grateful to Russia for their statehood, for the fact that Finland exists as a country.” “If the United States threatens our state, it’s good: here is the Sarmat [Satan-2] for you, and there will be nuclear ashes from you if you think that Russia should not exist,” he continued. “And Finland says that it is at one with the USA. Well, get in line.” The Satan-2 is a ballistic missile capable of carrying 10 to 15 nuclear warheads, with an estimated destructive power of three megatons each. Russia wouldn’t need to move nukes to its European border to carry out its threat, officials boasted. “We can hit with a Sarmat [known in the West as Satan-2] from Siberia, and even reach the UK,” he said. “And if we strike from Kaliningrad … the hypersonic’s reaching time is 200 seconds – so go ahead, guys. “On the Finnish border we will have not strategic weapons, but Kinzhal-class, one that will reach Finland in 20 seconds, or even 10 seconds.” Separately, Deputy Foreign Minister Alexander Grushko said Russia knows that NATO wants to “militarize everything within reach,” Interfax news agency reported. </document> <category> URW: Amplifying war-related fears: There is a real possibility that nuclear weapons will be employed </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Article quoting Russian officials threatening military action towards Western countries in case of NATO expansion. Article suggests nuclear weapons could be deployed, both towards Europe and US soil.

EN_UA_004209.txt

URW: Amplifying war-related fears

URW: Amplifying war-related fears: There is a real possibility that nuclear weapons will be employed

Article quoting Putin and Russian officials, claiming that they have the power to produce nuclear strikes in Western territory. The article aims to fearmonger by using detailed descriptions of Russian nuclear capabilities while keeping a writing style akin to reporting.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Russia threatens nukes for US, UK, Finland if NATO expands Russia threatens nukes for US, UK, Finland if NATO expands Vladimir Putin warned the president of Finland Saturday that any effort to join NATO would “negatively” affect relations between the two countries. The comments followed another Russian leader’s threat to use the Satan-2 hypersonic nuclear missile to strike Britain and Finland “in just 200 seconds” — and that the weapons could be used to hit the United States as well. As NATO foreign ministers gathered in Berlin, with discussion about potential applications from Sweden and Finland to join the Western military alliance on the agenda, Putin spoke to Finnish leader Sauli Niinisto. Nijnisto told Putin in the phone conversation that the traditionally non-aligned country “will decide to apply for NATO membership in the coming days.” Finland and Sweden, also traditionally neutral, are moving toward the applications in response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. In response, Russia cut off electricity supplies to Finland on Friday. Putin told Niinisto that Finland’s abandonment “of its traditional policy of military neutrality would be an error since there are no threats to Finland’s security,” the Kremlin said in a statement issued after the call. “Such a change in the country’s foreign policy could negatively affect Russian-Finnish relations, which had been built in the spirit of good neighborliness and partnership for many years, and were mutually beneficial.” Niinisto’s office said in a statement that he told Putin how starkly Finland’s security environment had changed after Moscow’s Feb. 24 invasion of Ukraine. The exchange came amid escalating rhetoric over the potential for NATO to expand beyond its current 30 members. “If Finland wants to join this bloc, then our goal is absolutely legitimate — to question the existence of this state. This is logical,” said Aleksey Zhuravlyov, 59, the deputy chairman of the Russian parliament’s defense committee, said in an interview with The Mirror. “The Finns in general should be grateful to Russia for their statehood, for the fact that Finland exists as a country.” “If the United States threatens our state, it’s good: here is the Sarmat [Satan-2] for you, and there will be nuclear ashes from you if you think that Russia should not exist,” he continued. “And Finland says that it is at one with the USA. Well, get in line.” The Satan-2 is a ballistic missile capable of carrying 10 to 15 nuclear warheads, with an estimated destructive power of three megatons each. Russia wouldn’t need to move nukes to its European border to carry out its threat, officials boasted. “We can hit with a Sarmat [known in the West as Satan-2] from Siberia, and even reach the UK,” he said. “And if we strike from Kaliningrad … the hypersonic’s reaching time is 200 seconds – so go ahead, guys. “On the Finnish border we will have not strategic weapons, but Kinzhal-class, one that will reach Finland in 20 seconds, or even 10 seconds.” Separately, Deputy Foreign Minister Alexander Grushko said Russia knows that NATO wants to “militarize everything within reach,” Interfax news agency reported. </document> <category> URW: Amplifying war-related fears: There is a real possibility that nuclear weapons will be employed </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Article talks about potential nuclear war between Russia and multiple NATO members, citing Russian officials making threats to use nuclear weapons

EN_UA_004209.txt

URW: Amplifying war-related fears

URW: Amplifying war-related fears: There is a real possibility that nuclear weapons will be employed

Article quoting Putin and Russian officials, claiming that they have the power to produce nuclear strikes in Western territory. The article aims to fearmonger by using detailed descriptions of Russian nuclear capabilities while keeping a writing style akin to reporting.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> International agencies call for urgent aid to address food insecurity The Russian invasion of Ukraine, and Western sanctions on Moscow, have sent energy and food prices soaring in recent weeks, while rising natural gas prices also have impacted fertilizer production, which in turn hurts farmers. ajor international organizations issued an appeal Wednesday for urgent measures to deal with rising food insecurity in poor countries, including financing to support farmers and increase food supplies. The Russian invasion of Ukraine, and Western sanctions on Moscow, have sent energy and food prices soaring in recent weeks, while rising natural gas prices also have impacted fertilizer production, which in turn hurts farmers. "It is critical to quickly provide support for food insecure countries in a coordinated manner," the heads of the IMF, World Bank, World Trade Organization and UN World Food Program said in a joint statement. Protests have erupted in some countries over high prices, and the statement said, "The increase in food prices and supply shocks can fuel social tensions in many of the affected countries, especially those that are already fragile or affected by conflict." The organizations called on the international community to provide financing for emergency food supplies, a safety net for poor families and farmers, and to increase agricultural production. They also called for "open trade" that avoids export restrictions or "humanitarian food purchases." While the poor nations are most vulnerable to the crisis, middle income countries increasingly are at risk, the statement said. "Surging fertilizer prices along with significant cuts in global supplies have important implications for food production in most countries, including major producers and exporters, who rely heavily on fertilizer imports," they said. IMF chief Kristalina Georgieva, World Bank President David Malpass, WTO head Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala and WFP director David Beasley issued the statement before next week's meeting of the IMF and World Bank. Increased fragility The war in Ukraine came as the global economy was trying to right itself following the COVID-19 pandemic, while navigating supply chain snarls that created shortages and a surge in inflation. New lockdowns in China have added further uncertainty to the recovery. Ukraine is a key source of grain while Russia is a major producer of energy and fertilizer needed for agriculture. Protestors in Peru have taken to the streets to demand government action, as did people in Sri Lanka, where the government on Tuesday announced it was defaulting on its US$51 billion in foreign debt. Poverty rose sharply during the pandemic, and the World Bank warns that for each one percentage point increase in food prices, 10 million people are thrown into extreme poverty worldwide. "Sharply higher prices for staples and supply shortages are increasing pressure on households worldwide and pushing millions more into poverty," the officials said. "Increased fragility and conflict pose persistent harm to people around the globe." Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen. Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback. </document> <category> URW: Negative Consequences for the West: Sanctions imposed by Western countries will backfire </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Multiple paragraphs suggest that the Western sanctions will lead to poverty and hardship in countries all over the world.

EN_UA_003579.txt

URW: Negative Consequences for the West

URW: Negative Consequences for the West: Sanctions imposed by Western countries will backfire

Article presenting various sources and arguments over the negative effects of Western sanctions to the food supply chain claiming it will produce poverty to the West but also to poor and middle countries as well.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> International agencies call for urgent aid to address food insecurity The Russian invasion of Ukraine, and Western sanctions on Moscow, have sent energy and food prices soaring in recent weeks, while rising natural gas prices also have impacted fertilizer production, which in turn hurts farmers. ajor international organizations issued an appeal Wednesday for urgent measures to deal with rising food insecurity in poor countries, including financing to support farmers and increase food supplies. The Russian invasion of Ukraine, and Western sanctions on Moscow, have sent energy and food prices soaring in recent weeks, while rising natural gas prices also have impacted fertilizer production, which in turn hurts farmers. "It is critical to quickly provide support for food insecure countries in a coordinated manner," the heads of the IMF, World Bank, World Trade Organization and UN World Food Program said in a joint statement. Protests have erupted in some countries over high prices, and the statement said, "The increase in food prices and supply shocks can fuel social tensions in many of the affected countries, especially those that are already fragile or affected by conflict." The organizations called on the international community to provide financing for emergency food supplies, a safety net for poor families and farmers, and to increase agricultural production. They also called for "open trade" that avoids export restrictions or "humanitarian food purchases." While the poor nations are most vulnerable to the crisis, middle income countries increasingly are at risk, the statement said. "Surging fertilizer prices along with significant cuts in global supplies have important implications for food production in most countries, including major producers and exporters, who rely heavily on fertilizer imports," they said. IMF chief Kristalina Georgieva, World Bank President David Malpass, WTO head Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala and WFP director David Beasley issued the statement before next week's meeting of the IMF and World Bank. Increased fragility The war in Ukraine came as the global economy was trying to right itself following the COVID-19 pandemic, while navigating supply chain snarls that created shortages and a surge in inflation. New lockdowns in China have added further uncertainty to the recovery. Ukraine is a key source of grain while Russia is a major producer of energy and fertilizer needed for agriculture. Protestors in Peru have taken to the streets to demand government action, as did people in Sri Lanka, where the government on Tuesday announced it was defaulting on its US$51 billion in foreign debt. Poverty rose sharply during the pandemic, and the World Bank warns that for each one percentage point increase in food prices, 10 million people are thrown into extreme poverty worldwide. "Sharply higher prices for staples and supply shortages are increasing pressure on households worldwide and pushing millions more into poverty," the officials said. "Increased fragility and conflict pose persistent harm to people around the globe." Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen. Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback. </document> <category> URW: Negative Consequences for the West: Sanctions imposed by Western countries will backfire </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Article conveys a sense of panic, especially regarding Western sanctions on Russia. It argues that the negative economic impact of sanctions will be felt most intensely in non-Western countries

EN_UA_003579.txt

URW: Negative Consequences for the West

URW: Negative Consequences for the West: Sanctions imposed by Western countries will backfire

Article presenting various sources and arguments over the negative effects of Western sanctions to the food supply chain claiming it will produce poverty to the West but also to poor and middle countries as well.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> International agencies call for urgent aid to address food insecurity The Russian invasion of Ukraine, and Western sanctions on Moscow, have sent energy and food prices soaring in recent weeks, while rising natural gas prices also have impacted fertilizer production, which in turn hurts farmers. ajor international organizations issued an appeal Wednesday for urgent measures to deal with rising food insecurity in poor countries, including financing to support farmers and increase food supplies. The Russian invasion of Ukraine, and Western sanctions on Moscow, have sent energy and food prices soaring in recent weeks, while rising natural gas prices also have impacted fertilizer production, which in turn hurts farmers. "It is critical to quickly provide support for food insecure countries in a coordinated manner," the heads of the IMF, World Bank, World Trade Organization and UN World Food Program said in a joint statement. Protests have erupted in some countries over high prices, and the statement said, "The increase in food prices and supply shocks can fuel social tensions in many of the affected countries, especially those that are already fragile or affected by conflict." The organizations called on the international community to provide financing for emergency food supplies, a safety net for poor families and farmers, and to increase agricultural production. They also called for "open trade" that avoids export restrictions or "humanitarian food purchases." While the poor nations are most vulnerable to the crisis, middle income countries increasingly are at risk, the statement said. "Surging fertilizer prices along with significant cuts in global supplies have important implications for food production in most countries, including major producers and exporters, who rely heavily on fertilizer imports," they said. IMF chief Kristalina Georgieva, World Bank President David Malpass, WTO head Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala and WFP director David Beasley issued the statement before next week's meeting of the IMF and World Bank. Increased fragility The war in Ukraine came as the global economy was trying to right itself following the COVID-19 pandemic, while navigating supply chain snarls that created shortages and a surge in inflation. New lockdowns in China have added further uncertainty to the recovery. Ukraine is a key source of grain while Russia is a major producer of energy and fertilizer needed for agriculture. Protestors in Peru have taken to the streets to demand government action, as did people in Sri Lanka, where the government on Tuesday announced it was defaulting on its US$51 billion in foreign debt. Poverty rose sharply during the pandemic, and the World Bank warns that for each one percentage point increase in food prices, 10 million people are thrown into extreme poverty worldwide. "Sharply higher prices for staples and supply shortages are increasing pressure on households worldwide and pushing millions more into poverty," the officials said. "Increased fragility and conflict pose persistent harm to people around the globe." Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen. Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback. </document> <category> URW: Negative Consequences for the West: Sanctions imposed by Western countries will backfire </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text conveys a narrative depicting the sanctions imposed by Western countries as ineffective and counterproductive. Specifically, they are blamed for the rising food prices which will fuel social unrest and poverty

EN_UA_003579.txt

URW: Negative Consequences for the West

URW: Negative Consequences for the West: Sanctions imposed by Western countries will backfire

Article presenting various sources and arguments over the negative effects of Western sanctions to the food supply chain claiming it will produce poverty to the West but also to poor and middle countries as well.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> International agencies call for urgent aid to address food insecurity The Russian invasion of Ukraine, and Western sanctions on Moscow, have sent energy and food prices soaring in recent weeks, while rising natural gas prices also have impacted fertilizer production, which in turn hurts farmers. ajor international organizations issued an appeal Wednesday for urgent measures to deal with rising food insecurity in poor countries, including financing to support farmers and increase food supplies. The Russian invasion of Ukraine, and Western sanctions on Moscow, have sent energy and food prices soaring in recent weeks, while rising natural gas prices also have impacted fertilizer production, which in turn hurts farmers. "It is critical to quickly provide support for food insecure countries in a coordinated manner," the heads of the IMF, World Bank, World Trade Organization and UN World Food Program said in a joint statement. Protests have erupted in some countries over high prices, and the statement said, "The increase in food prices and supply shocks can fuel social tensions in many of the affected countries, especially those that are already fragile or affected by conflict." The organizations called on the international community to provide financing for emergency food supplies, a safety net for poor families and farmers, and to increase agricultural production. They also called for "open trade" that avoids export restrictions or "humanitarian food purchases." While the poor nations are most vulnerable to the crisis, middle income countries increasingly are at risk, the statement said. "Surging fertilizer prices along with significant cuts in global supplies have important implications for food production in most countries, including major producers and exporters, who rely heavily on fertilizer imports," they said. IMF chief Kristalina Georgieva, World Bank President David Malpass, WTO head Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala and WFP director David Beasley issued the statement before next week's meeting of the IMF and World Bank. Increased fragility The war in Ukraine came as the global economy was trying to right itself following the COVID-19 pandemic, while navigating supply chain snarls that created shortages and a surge in inflation. New lockdowns in China have added further uncertainty to the recovery. Ukraine is a key source of grain while Russia is a major producer of energy and fertilizer needed for agriculture. Protestors in Peru have taken to the streets to demand government action, as did people in Sri Lanka, where the government on Tuesday announced it was defaulting on its US$51 billion in foreign debt. Poverty rose sharply during the pandemic, and the World Bank warns that for each one percentage point increase in food prices, 10 million people are thrown into extreme poverty worldwide. "Sharply higher prices for staples and supply shortages are increasing pressure on households worldwide and pushing millions more into poverty," the officials said. "Increased fragility and conflict pose persistent harm to people around the globe." Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen. Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback. </document> <category> URW: Negative Consequences for the West: Sanctions imposed by Western countries will backfire </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Article reports food shortage crisis in several countries that are struggling to provide food to their citizens, citing among the main causes sanctions imposed by Western countries.

EN_UA_003579.txt

URW: Negative Consequences for the West

URW: Negative Consequences for the West: Sanctions imposed by Western countries will backfire

Article presenting various sources and arguments over the negative effects of Western sanctions to the food supply chain claiming it will produce poverty to the West but also to poor and middle countries as well.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> International agencies call for urgent aid to address food insecurity The Russian invasion of Ukraine, and Western sanctions on Moscow, have sent energy and food prices soaring in recent weeks, while rising natural gas prices also have impacted fertilizer production, which in turn hurts farmers. ajor international organizations issued an appeal Wednesday for urgent measures to deal with rising food insecurity in poor countries, including financing to support farmers and increase food supplies. The Russian invasion of Ukraine, and Western sanctions on Moscow, have sent energy and food prices soaring in recent weeks, while rising natural gas prices also have impacted fertilizer production, which in turn hurts farmers. "It is critical to quickly provide support for food insecure countries in a coordinated manner," the heads of the IMF, World Bank, World Trade Organization and UN World Food Program said in a joint statement. Protests have erupted in some countries over high prices, and the statement said, "The increase in food prices and supply shocks can fuel social tensions in many of the affected countries, especially those that are already fragile or affected by conflict." The organizations called on the international community to provide financing for emergency food supplies, a safety net for poor families and farmers, and to increase agricultural production. They also called for "open trade" that avoids export restrictions or "humanitarian food purchases." While the poor nations are most vulnerable to the crisis, middle income countries increasingly are at risk, the statement said. "Surging fertilizer prices along with significant cuts in global supplies have important implications for food production in most countries, including major producers and exporters, who rely heavily on fertilizer imports," they said. IMF chief Kristalina Georgieva, World Bank President David Malpass, WTO head Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala and WFP director David Beasley issued the statement before next week's meeting of the IMF and World Bank. Increased fragility The war in Ukraine came as the global economy was trying to right itself following the COVID-19 pandemic, while navigating supply chain snarls that created shortages and a surge in inflation. New lockdowns in China have added further uncertainty to the recovery. Ukraine is a key source of grain while Russia is a major producer of energy and fertilizer needed for agriculture. Protestors in Peru have taken to the streets to demand government action, as did people in Sri Lanka, where the government on Tuesday announced it was defaulting on its US$51 billion in foreign debt. Poverty rose sharply during the pandemic, and the World Bank warns that for each one percentage point increase in food prices, 10 million people are thrown into extreme poverty worldwide. "Sharply higher prices for staples and supply shortages are increasing pressure on households worldwide and pushing millions more into poverty," the officials said. "Increased fragility and conflict pose persistent harm to people around the globe." Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen. Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback. </document> <category> URW: Negative Consequences for the West: Sanctions imposed by Western countries will backfire </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text attacks Western countries for sanctioning Russia, claiming that the result of it is that poor countries are negatively affected.

EN_UA_003579.txt

URW: Negative Consequences for the West

URW: Negative Consequences for the West: Sanctions imposed by Western countries will backfire

Article presenting various sources and arguments over the negative effects of Western sanctions to the food supply chain claiming it will produce poverty to the West but also to poor and middle countries as well.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Putin Says West Prepared To Scapegoat Zelensky For War Failures: 'Replaced By Next Year' Putin Says West Prepared To Scapegoat Zelensky For War Failures: 'Replaced By Next Year' Russian President Vladimir Putin is in Vietnam, where he signed at least a dozen energy and trade deals with the country's President To Lam, on his tour to shore up ties in Asia in an effort to offset the West's drive to isolate Moscow. On his last day in the country he made some wide-ranging remarks to the press, and among the most interesting was a statement on the future of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Putin predicted at a moment things are going very badly for Ukrainian forces, and at a rare time Western media seems to be turning on Zelensky, that the Ukrainian leader will soon be replaced over his poor and unpopular decision-making. Putin suggested Washington is essentially going to make him a scapegoat. "In the West, they simply do not want to replace him [Zelenskyy], the time is not right. I think it's obvious to anyone. They will blame all unpopular decisions on him, including lowering the [military] draft age, and that's it," Putin asserted, according to Russian media translation. That's when he followed with: "And then they'll replace him. I think it will happen sometime in the first half of next year." Putin could be at least in part seizing on the obvious increased negative coverage of the Zelensky government in major Western media outlets, from the BBC to NY Times to Wall Street Journal. Indeed Zelensky's 'celebrity power' on display throughout the first part of the war, where it seemed he could simply do no wrong in the media's eyes, is waning fast. More importantly, there are signs of large-scale dissent among the Ukrainian population as recruitment officers violently grab men from off the streets. Despite Kiev forces clearly being against the ropes of late, Zelensky has still refused to even contemplate negotiating. He has stood by his earlier commitment to not enter dialogue toward ceasefire until Putin is out of power. Putin commented on this while in Vietnam: Talks on Ukraine could take place as early as tomorrow, but Russia will use the current situation as a starting point, the president added. "We have been conducting these behind-the-scenes talks, and what we hoped for has failed," Putin told reporters. Zelensky's advisor, Alexey Arestovich, argued in 2019:— Glenn Diesen (@Glenn_Diesen) April 9, 2024 - Attempting to join NATO will pressure Russia to invade - "Our price for joining NATO is a big war with Russia" - Predicting the war would start between 2020-22, with remarkable detailshttps://t.co/8iEn5wSUd9 pic.twitter.com/9fmw5X1DYl Interestingly, Putin had back in May declared Zelensky "illegitimate" after Ukraine failed to hold previously scheduled elections. Zelensky's term was set to end May 20, but the government declared no elections until the war is over, citing martial law. </document> <category> URW: Discrediting Ukraine: Discrediting Ukrainian government and officials and policies </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text presents several paragraphs depicting the Ukrainian government as weak and incompetent. Indeed, the Ukrainian people are described as having doubts in the legitimacy of their government.

EN_UA_027879.txt

URW: Discrediting Ukraine

URW: Discrediting Ukraine: Discrediting Ukrainian government and officials and policies

Multiple passages depict Zelensky as an illegitimate leader which is taking unpopular decisions. His consent is described as decreasing in relation to the negative situation of the Ukrainian military as well as the withdrawal of Western allies' support.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Putin Says West Prepared To Scapegoat Zelensky For War Failures: 'Replaced By Next Year' Putin Says West Prepared To Scapegoat Zelensky For War Failures: 'Replaced By Next Year' Russian President Vladimir Putin is in Vietnam, where he signed at least a dozen energy and trade deals with the country's President To Lam, on his tour to shore up ties in Asia in an effort to offset the West's drive to isolate Moscow. On his last day in the country he made some wide-ranging remarks to the press, and among the most interesting was a statement on the future of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Putin predicted at a moment things are going very badly for Ukrainian forces, and at a rare time Western media seems to be turning on Zelensky, that the Ukrainian leader will soon be replaced over his poor and unpopular decision-making. Putin suggested Washington is essentially going to make him a scapegoat. "In the West, they simply do not want to replace him [Zelenskyy], the time is not right. I think it's obvious to anyone. They will blame all unpopular decisions on him, including lowering the [military] draft age, and that's it," Putin asserted, according to Russian media translation. That's when he followed with: "And then they'll replace him. I think it will happen sometime in the first half of next year." Putin could be at least in part seizing on the obvious increased negative coverage of the Zelensky government in major Western media outlets, from the BBC to NY Times to Wall Street Journal. Indeed Zelensky's 'celebrity power' on display throughout the first part of the war, where it seemed he could simply do no wrong in the media's eyes, is waning fast. More importantly, there are signs of large-scale dissent among the Ukrainian population as recruitment officers violently grab men from off the streets. Despite Kiev forces clearly being against the ropes of late, Zelensky has still refused to even contemplate negotiating. He has stood by his earlier commitment to not enter dialogue toward ceasefire until Putin is out of power. Putin commented on this while in Vietnam: Talks on Ukraine could take place as early as tomorrow, but Russia will use the current situation as a starting point, the president added. "We have been conducting these behind-the-scenes talks, and what we hoped for has failed," Putin told reporters. Zelensky's advisor, Alexey Arestovich, argued in 2019:— Glenn Diesen (@Glenn_Diesen) April 9, 2024 - Attempting to join NATO will pressure Russia to invade - "Our price for joining NATO is a big war with Russia" - Predicting the war would start between 2020-22, with remarkable detailshttps://t.co/8iEn5wSUd9 pic.twitter.com/9fmw5X1DYl Interestingly, Putin had back in May declared Zelensky "illegitimate" after Ukraine failed to hold previously scheduled elections. Zelensky's term was set to end May 20, but the government declared no elections until the war is over, citing martial law. </document> <category> URW: Discrediting Ukraine: Discrediting Ukrainian government and officials and policies </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The author accuses Zelensky of being illegitimate and claim he is being propped up by the West to the detriment of Ukraine

EN_UA_027879.txt

URW: Discrediting Ukraine

URW: Discrediting Ukraine: Discrediting Ukrainian government and officials and policies

Multiple passages depict Zelensky as an illegitimate leader which is taking unpopular decisions. His consent is described as decreasing in relation to the negative situation of the Ukrainian military as well as the withdrawal of Western allies' support.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Putin Says West Prepared To Scapegoat Zelensky For War Failures: 'Replaced By Next Year' Putin Says West Prepared To Scapegoat Zelensky For War Failures: 'Replaced By Next Year' Russian President Vladimir Putin is in Vietnam, where he signed at least a dozen energy and trade deals with the country's President To Lam, on his tour to shore up ties in Asia in an effort to offset the West's drive to isolate Moscow. On his last day in the country he made some wide-ranging remarks to the press, and among the most interesting was a statement on the future of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Putin predicted at a moment things are going very badly for Ukrainian forces, and at a rare time Western media seems to be turning on Zelensky, that the Ukrainian leader will soon be replaced over his poor and unpopular decision-making. Putin suggested Washington is essentially going to make him a scapegoat. "In the West, they simply do not want to replace him [Zelenskyy], the time is not right. I think it's obvious to anyone. They will blame all unpopular decisions on him, including lowering the [military] draft age, and that's it," Putin asserted, according to Russian media translation. That's when he followed with: "And then they'll replace him. I think it will happen sometime in the first half of next year." Putin could be at least in part seizing on the obvious increased negative coverage of the Zelensky government in major Western media outlets, from the BBC to NY Times to Wall Street Journal. Indeed Zelensky's 'celebrity power' on display throughout the first part of the war, where it seemed he could simply do no wrong in the media's eyes, is waning fast. More importantly, there are signs of large-scale dissent among the Ukrainian population as recruitment officers violently grab men from off the streets. Despite Kiev forces clearly being against the ropes of late, Zelensky has still refused to even contemplate negotiating. He has stood by his earlier commitment to not enter dialogue toward ceasefire until Putin is out of power. Putin commented on this while in Vietnam: Talks on Ukraine could take place as early as tomorrow, but Russia will use the current situation as a starting point, the president added. "We have been conducting these behind-the-scenes talks, and what we hoped for has failed," Putin told reporters. Zelensky's advisor, Alexey Arestovich, argued in 2019:— Glenn Diesen (@Glenn_Diesen) April 9, 2024 - Attempting to join NATO will pressure Russia to invade - "Our price for joining NATO is a big war with Russia" - Predicting the war would start between 2020-22, with remarkable detailshttps://t.co/8iEn5wSUd9 pic.twitter.com/9fmw5X1DYl Interestingly, Putin had back in May declared Zelensky "illegitimate" after Ukraine failed to hold previously scheduled elections. Zelensky's term was set to end May 20, but the government declared no elections until the war is over, citing martial law. </document> <category> URW: Discrediting Ukraine: Discrediting Ukrainian government and officials and policies </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The article claims that Ukrainian president is illegitimate, pointing out some of the controversial decisions that have made him unpopular among the Ukrainian population, which have led to significant public dissent.

EN_UA_027879.txt

URW: Discrediting Ukraine

URW: Discrediting Ukraine: Discrediting Ukrainian government and officials and policies

Multiple passages depict Zelensky as an illegitimate leader which is taking unpopular decisions. His consent is described as decreasing in relation to the negative situation of the Ukrainian military as well as the withdrawal of Western allies' support.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Putin Says West Prepared To Scapegoat Zelensky For War Failures: 'Replaced By Next Year' Putin Says West Prepared To Scapegoat Zelensky For War Failures: 'Replaced By Next Year' Russian President Vladimir Putin is in Vietnam, where he signed at least a dozen energy and trade deals with the country's President To Lam, on his tour to shore up ties in Asia in an effort to offset the West's drive to isolate Moscow. On his last day in the country he made some wide-ranging remarks to the press, and among the most interesting was a statement on the future of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Putin predicted at a moment things are going very badly for Ukrainian forces, and at a rare time Western media seems to be turning on Zelensky, that the Ukrainian leader will soon be replaced over his poor and unpopular decision-making. Putin suggested Washington is essentially going to make him a scapegoat. "In the West, they simply do not want to replace him [Zelenskyy], the time is not right. I think it's obvious to anyone. They will blame all unpopular decisions on him, including lowering the [military] draft age, and that's it," Putin asserted, according to Russian media translation. That's when he followed with: "And then they'll replace him. I think it will happen sometime in the first half of next year." Putin could be at least in part seizing on the obvious increased negative coverage of the Zelensky government in major Western media outlets, from the BBC to NY Times to Wall Street Journal. Indeed Zelensky's 'celebrity power' on display throughout the first part of the war, where it seemed he could simply do no wrong in the media's eyes, is waning fast. More importantly, there are signs of large-scale dissent among the Ukrainian population as recruitment officers violently grab men from off the streets. Despite Kiev forces clearly being against the ropes of late, Zelensky has still refused to even contemplate negotiating. He has stood by his earlier commitment to not enter dialogue toward ceasefire until Putin is out of power. Putin commented on this while in Vietnam: Talks on Ukraine could take place as early as tomorrow, but Russia will use the current situation as a starting point, the president added. "We have been conducting these behind-the-scenes talks, and what we hoped for has failed," Putin told reporters. Zelensky's advisor, Alexey Arestovich, argued in 2019:— Glenn Diesen (@Glenn_Diesen) April 9, 2024 - Attempting to join NATO will pressure Russia to invade - "Our price for joining NATO is a big war with Russia" - Predicting the war would start between 2020-22, with remarkable detailshttps://t.co/8iEn5wSUd9 pic.twitter.com/9fmw5X1DYl Interestingly, Putin had back in May declared Zelensky "illegitimate" after Ukraine failed to hold previously scheduled elections. Zelensky's term was set to end May 20, but the government declared no elections until the war is over, citing martial law. </document> <category> URW: Discrediting Ukraine: Discrediting Ukrainian government and officials and policies </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Throughout the article, Ukrainian officials are discredited as being illegitimate and wrong-headed in their decision making, especially Zelensky. They claim that unpopular decisions are made to ensure NATO will provide enough support but these decisions are also leading to domestic uprising.

EN_UA_027879.txt

URW: Discrediting Ukraine

URW: Discrediting Ukraine: Discrediting Ukrainian government and officials and policies

Multiple passages depict Zelensky as an illegitimate leader which is taking unpopular decisions. His consent is described as decreasing in relation to the negative situation of the Ukrainian military as well as the withdrawal of Western allies' support.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Putin Says West Prepared To Scapegoat Zelensky For War Failures: 'Replaced By Next Year' Putin Says West Prepared To Scapegoat Zelensky For War Failures: 'Replaced By Next Year' Russian President Vladimir Putin is in Vietnam, where he signed at least a dozen energy and trade deals with the country's President To Lam, on his tour to shore up ties in Asia in an effort to offset the West's drive to isolate Moscow. On his last day in the country he made some wide-ranging remarks to the press, and among the most interesting was a statement on the future of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Putin predicted at a moment things are going very badly for Ukrainian forces, and at a rare time Western media seems to be turning on Zelensky, that the Ukrainian leader will soon be replaced over his poor and unpopular decision-making. Putin suggested Washington is essentially going to make him a scapegoat. "In the West, they simply do not want to replace him [Zelenskyy], the time is not right. I think it's obvious to anyone. They will blame all unpopular decisions on him, including lowering the [military] draft age, and that's it," Putin asserted, according to Russian media translation. That's when he followed with: "And then they'll replace him. I think it will happen sometime in the first half of next year." Putin could be at least in part seizing on the obvious increased negative coverage of the Zelensky government in major Western media outlets, from the BBC to NY Times to Wall Street Journal. Indeed Zelensky's 'celebrity power' on display throughout the first part of the war, where it seemed he could simply do no wrong in the media's eyes, is waning fast. More importantly, there are signs of large-scale dissent among the Ukrainian population as recruitment officers violently grab men from off the streets. Despite Kiev forces clearly being against the ropes of late, Zelensky has still refused to even contemplate negotiating. He has stood by his earlier commitment to not enter dialogue toward ceasefire until Putin is out of power. Putin commented on this while in Vietnam: Talks on Ukraine could take place as early as tomorrow, but Russia will use the current situation as a starting point, the president added. "We have been conducting these behind-the-scenes talks, and what we hoped for has failed," Putin told reporters. Zelensky's advisor, Alexey Arestovich, argued in 2019:— Glenn Diesen (@Glenn_Diesen) April 9, 2024 - Attempting to join NATO will pressure Russia to invade - "Our price for joining NATO is a big war with Russia" - Predicting the war would start between 2020-22, with remarkable detailshttps://t.co/8iEn5wSUd9 pic.twitter.com/9fmw5X1DYl Interestingly, Putin had back in May declared Zelensky "illegitimate" after Ukraine failed to hold previously scheduled elections. Zelensky's term was set to end May 20, but the government declared no elections until the war is over, citing martial law. </document> <category> URW: Discrediting Ukraine: Discrediting Ukrainian government and officials and policies </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The article suggest that Western media and officials are abandoning Zelensky and pointing out his unpopular decisions. Putin's arguments are presented as valid

EN_UA_027879.txt

URW: Discrediting Ukraine

URW: Discrediting Ukraine: Discrediting Ukrainian government and officials and policies

Multiple passages depict Zelensky as an illegitimate leader which is taking unpopular decisions. His consent is described as decreasing in relation to the negative situation of the Ukrainian military as well as the withdrawal of Western allies' support.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Putin Mobilizes More Troops, Hints at Nuclear Weapon Use in Conflict Over Ukraine Russian President Vladimir Putin on Sept. 21 accused Western powers of engaging in nuclear blackmail and put his country onto an enhanced wartime footing, ordering a partial military mobilization and vowing to use “all means available” in the event of a threat against Russia and its people. “Those that allow such statements shall be reminded that our country also has various weapons of mass destruction,” including some that are more advanced than those in NATO’s arsenal, he added, according to a translation of his remarks by Sky News. Accusations Against the WestPutin accused the West of seeking to “weaken, divide and ultimately destroy” Russia, according to an official Kremlin translation of part of his speech, which was posted on the Kremlin website. Claiming that Western powers had concocted these plans long ago, Putin said they fomented anti-Russia terrorist activity in the Caucasus, moved “NATO’s offensive infrastructure” near his country’s borders, nurtured “hatred for Russia for decades,” and intended to set up Ukraine as an “anti-Russia bridgehead.” Russia’s Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu told Russian state television that Putin’s mobilization order would encompass reservists but wouldn’t include students or anyone without prior military service. The Russian leadership has been reluctant to order a broad military mobilization, portraying the invasion of Ukraine as a “special military operation” that’s limited in scope. Putin’s order marks the first time since World War Two that a military mobilization of Russian citizens has been invoked. Critical ReactionsPutin’s move drew critical reactions from Western leaders and Ukrainian officials. Bridget Brink, U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine, took to Twitter to describe Putin’s order as a sign of “weakness” and “failure.” Britain’s Defense Secretary Ben Wallace was cited by The Scotsman as saying that Putin’s order amounts to an admission of failure. “Putin’s breaking of his own promises not to mobilize parts of his population and the illegal annexation of parts of Ukraine, are an admission that his invasion is failing,” Wallace said. “No amount of threats and propaganda can hide the fact that Ukraine is winning the war, the international community are united, and Russia is becoming a pariah,” he added. Anxious investors fled risk assets following Putin’s speech, while safe havens like bonds and the U.S. dollar rose. </document> <category> URW: Amplifying war-related fears: There is a real possibility that nuclear weapons will be employed </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Several paragraphs throughout the text convey a narrative portraying Russia as using and even threatening to use nuclear weapons, as well as military strategies that suggest desperation and failure in the attempt to invade and control Ukraine

EN_UA_008072.txt

URW: Amplifying war-related fears

URW: Amplifying war-related fears: There is a real possibility that nuclear weapons will be employed

Article quoting Putin's statements that highlight the possibility of use of nuclear weapons provoking fear. In the course of the text, a reporting style is used that ultimately highlights Russian leadership's failings by reporting on Western officials quotes.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Putin Mobilizes More Troops, Hints at Nuclear Weapon Use in Conflict Over Ukraine Russian President Vladimir Putin on Sept. 21 accused Western powers of engaging in nuclear blackmail and put his country onto an enhanced wartime footing, ordering a partial military mobilization and vowing to use “all means available” in the event of a threat against Russia and its people. “Those that allow such statements shall be reminded that our country also has various weapons of mass destruction,” including some that are more advanced than those in NATO’s arsenal, he added, according to a translation of his remarks by Sky News. Accusations Against the WestPutin accused the West of seeking to “weaken, divide and ultimately destroy” Russia, according to an official Kremlin translation of part of his speech, which was posted on the Kremlin website. Claiming that Western powers had concocted these plans long ago, Putin said they fomented anti-Russia terrorist activity in the Caucasus, moved “NATO’s offensive infrastructure” near his country’s borders, nurtured “hatred for Russia for decades,” and intended to set up Ukraine as an “anti-Russia bridgehead.” Russia’s Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu told Russian state television that Putin’s mobilization order would encompass reservists but wouldn’t include students or anyone without prior military service. The Russian leadership has been reluctant to order a broad military mobilization, portraying the invasion of Ukraine as a “special military operation” that’s limited in scope. Putin’s order marks the first time since World War Two that a military mobilization of Russian citizens has been invoked. Critical ReactionsPutin’s move drew critical reactions from Western leaders and Ukrainian officials. Bridget Brink, U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine, took to Twitter to describe Putin’s order as a sign of “weakness” and “failure.” Britain’s Defense Secretary Ben Wallace was cited by The Scotsman as saying that Putin’s order amounts to an admission of failure. “Putin’s breaking of his own promises not to mobilize parts of his population and the illegal annexation of parts of Ukraine, are an admission that his invasion is failing,” Wallace said. “No amount of threats and propaganda can hide the fact that Ukraine is winning the war, the international community are united, and Russia is becoming a pariah,” he added. Anxious investors fled risk assets following Putin’s speech, while safe havens like bonds and the U.S. dollar rose. </document> <category> URW: Amplifying war-related fears: There is a real possibility that nuclear weapons will be employed </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Article quoting Putin saying that Russia is willing to use nuclear weapons in its conflict with Ukraine

EN_UA_008072.txt

URW: Amplifying war-related fears

URW: Amplifying war-related fears: There is a real possibility that nuclear weapons will be employed

Article quoting Putin's statements that highlight the possibility of use of nuclear weapons provoking fear. In the course of the text, a reporting style is used that ultimately highlights Russian leadership's failings by reporting on Western officials quotes.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Putin Mobilizes More Troops, Hints at Nuclear Weapon Use in Conflict Over Ukraine Russian President Vladimir Putin on Sept. 21 accused Western powers of engaging in nuclear blackmail and put his country onto an enhanced wartime footing, ordering a partial military mobilization and vowing to use “all means available” in the event of a threat against Russia and its people. “Those that allow such statements shall be reminded that our country also has various weapons of mass destruction,” including some that are more advanced than those in NATO’s arsenal, he added, according to a translation of his remarks by Sky News. Accusations Against the WestPutin accused the West of seeking to “weaken, divide and ultimately destroy” Russia, according to an official Kremlin translation of part of his speech, which was posted on the Kremlin website. Claiming that Western powers had concocted these plans long ago, Putin said they fomented anti-Russia terrorist activity in the Caucasus, moved “NATO’s offensive infrastructure” near his country’s borders, nurtured “hatred for Russia for decades,” and intended to set up Ukraine as an “anti-Russia bridgehead.” Russia’s Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu told Russian state television that Putin’s mobilization order would encompass reservists but wouldn’t include students or anyone without prior military service. The Russian leadership has been reluctant to order a broad military mobilization, portraying the invasion of Ukraine as a “special military operation” that’s limited in scope. Putin’s order marks the first time since World War Two that a military mobilization of Russian citizens has been invoked. Critical ReactionsPutin’s move drew critical reactions from Western leaders and Ukrainian officials. Bridget Brink, U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine, took to Twitter to describe Putin’s order as a sign of “weakness” and “failure.” Britain’s Defense Secretary Ben Wallace was cited by The Scotsman as saying that Putin’s order amounts to an admission of failure. “Putin’s breaking of his own promises not to mobilize parts of his population and the illegal annexation of parts of Ukraine, are an admission that his invasion is failing,” Wallace said. “No amount of threats and propaganda can hide the fact that Ukraine is winning the war, the international community are united, and Russia is becoming a pariah,” he added. Anxious investors fled risk assets following Putin’s speech, while safe havens like bonds and the U.S. dollar rose. </document> <category> URW: Amplifying war-related fears: There is a real possibility that nuclear weapons will be employed </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text conveys a sense of urgency regarding the use of nuclear weapons by Russia, citing Putins declaration and reactions from Western leaders and officials

EN_UA_008072.txt

URW: Amplifying war-related fears

URW: Amplifying war-related fears: There is a real possibility that nuclear weapons will be employed

Article quoting Putin's statements that highlight the possibility of use of nuclear weapons provoking fear. In the course of the text, a reporting style is used that ultimately highlights Russian leadership's failings by reporting on Western officials quotes.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Putin Mobilizes More Troops, Hints at Nuclear Weapon Use in Conflict Over Ukraine Russian President Vladimir Putin on Sept. 21 accused Western powers of engaging in nuclear blackmail and put his country onto an enhanced wartime footing, ordering a partial military mobilization and vowing to use “all means available” in the event of a threat against Russia and its people. “Those that allow such statements shall be reminded that our country also has various weapons of mass destruction,” including some that are more advanced than those in NATO’s arsenal, he added, according to a translation of his remarks by Sky News. Accusations Against the WestPutin accused the West of seeking to “weaken, divide and ultimately destroy” Russia, according to an official Kremlin translation of part of his speech, which was posted on the Kremlin website. Claiming that Western powers had concocted these plans long ago, Putin said they fomented anti-Russia terrorist activity in the Caucasus, moved “NATO’s offensive infrastructure” near his country’s borders, nurtured “hatred for Russia for decades,” and intended to set up Ukraine as an “anti-Russia bridgehead.” Russia’s Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu told Russian state television that Putin’s mobilization order would encompass reservists but wouldn’t include students or anyone without prior military service. The Russian leadership has been reluctant to order a broad military mobilization, portraying the invasion of Ukraine as a “special military operation” that’s limited in scope. Putin’s order marks the first time since World War Two that a military mobilization of Russian citizens has been invoked. Critical ReactionsPutin’s move drew critical reactions from Western leaders and Ukrainian officials. Bridget Brink, U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine, took to Twitter to describe Putin’s order as a sign of “weakness” and “failure.” Britain’s Defense Secretary Ben Wallace was cited by The Scotsman as saying that Putin’s order amounts to an admission of failure. “Putin’s breaking of his own promises not to mobilize parts of his population and the illegal annexation of parts of Ukraine, are an admission that his invasion is failing,” Wallace said. “No amount of threats and propaganda can hide the fact that Ukraine is winning the war, the international community are united, and Russia is becoming a pariah,” he added. Anxious investors fled risk assets following Putin’s speech, while safe havens like bonds and the U.S. dollar rose. </document> <category> URW: Amplifying war-related fears: There is a real possibility that nuclear weapons will be employed </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The article is reporting on Putin's decision to mobilize troops and hints that Russia has more advanced weapons, including nuclear, which would be used to protect Russia and its people.

EN_UA_008072.txt

URW: Amplifying war-related fears

URW: Amplifying war-related fears: There is a real possibility that nuclear weapons will be employed

Article quoting Putin's statements that highlight the possibility of use of nuclear weapons provoking fear. In the course of the text, a reporting style is used that ultimately highlights Russian leadership's failings by reporting on Western officials quotes.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Putin Mobilizes More Troops, Hints at Nuclear Weapon Use in Conflict Over Ukraine Russian President Vladimir Putin on Sept. 21 accused Western powers of engaging in nuclear blackmail and put his country onto an enhanced wartime footing, ordering a partial military mobilization and vowing to use “all means available” in the event of a threat against Russia and its people. “Those that allow such statements shall be reminded that our country also has various weapons of mass destruction,” including some that are more advanced than those in NATO’s arsenal, he added, according to a translation of his remarks by Sky News. Accusations Against the WestPutin accused the West of seeking to “weaken, divide and ultimately destroy” Russia, according to an official Kremlin translation of part of his speech, which was posted on the Kremlin website. Claiming that Western powers had concocted these plans long ago, Putin said they fomented anti-Russia terrorist activity in the Caucasus, moved “NATO’s offensive infrastructure” near his country’s borders, nurtured “hatred for Russia for decades,” and intended to set up Ukraine as an “anti-Russia bridgehead.” Russia’s Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu told Russian state television that Putin’s mobilization order would encompass reservists but wouldn’t include students or anyone without prior military service. The Russian leadership has been reluctant to order a broad military mobilization, portraying the invasion of Ukraine as a “special military operation” that’s limited in scope. Putin’s order marks the first time since World War Two that a military mobilization of Russian citizens has been invoked. Critical ReactionsPutin’s move drew critical reactions from Western leaders and Ukrainian officials. Bridget Brink, U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine, took to Twitter to describe Putin’s order as a sign of “weakness” and “failure.” Britain’s Defense Secretary Ben Wallace was cited by The Scotsman as saying that Putin’s order amounts to an admission of failure. “Putin’s breaking of his own promises not to mobilize parts of his population and the illegal annexation of parts of Ukraine, are an admission that his invasion is failing,” Wallace said. “No amount of threats and propaganda can hide the fact that Ukraine is winning the war, the international community are united, and Russia is becoming a pariah,” he added. Anxious investors fled risk assets following Putin’s speech, while safe havens like bonds and the U.S. dollar rose. </document> <category> URW: Amplifying war-related fears: There is a real possibility that nuclear weapons will be employed </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Article quoting Russian leaders and Western leaders describing Russia's escalation of the military action in Ukraine.

EN_UA_008072.txt

URW: Amplifying war-related fears

URW: Amplifying war-related fears: There is a real possibility that nuclear weapons will be employed

Article quoting Putin's statements that highlight the possibility of use of nuclear weapons provoking fear. In the course of the text, a reporting style is used that ultimately highlights Russian leadership's failings by reporting on Western officials quotes.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Head of German Intelligence Reveals Zelensky Behind Nord Stream Pipeline Attack The former head of German intelligence has revealed that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and President of Poland both collaborated to carry out the attack on the Nord Stream Pipelines. The Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipelines were sabotaged on 26 September 2022 after a series of underwater explosions and gas leaks. BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. You can unsubscribe any time. By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use Latest Video Modernity.news reports: Much of the legacy media initially blamed Russia for attack, claiming it was a false flag but offering no sensible reason as to why Moscow would target its own energy infrastructure. However, during an appearance on German broadcaster WELT-TV, August Hanning, who served as the head of Germany’s Federal Intelligence Service (BND) from 1998 to 2005, the attack was carried out at the behest of Zelensky and Andrzej Duda. According to Hanning, the act of sabotage occurred as a result of an “agreement between the highest officials in Ukraine and Poland.” “There were agreements between Zelensky and Duda to carry out the attack,” said Hanning. As we highlighted yesterday, Germany issued an arrest warrant for a Ukrainian diver believed to be involved in the attack on the Nord Stream pipelines, but Polish authorities failed to stop him at the border and he is now believed to be back in Ukraine. Berlin issued a European arrest warrant for Ukrainian citizen Volodymyr Z. after identifying him as the chief suspect for placing the explosives that destroyed the pipelines, but Polish authorities claimed they didn’t apprehend the suspect as a result of Berlin not including his name in a database of wanted persons. The pipeline attack was preceded by warnings from the White House that a Russian invasion of Ukraine would spell the end for Nord Stream 2. On January 27, 2022, Under-Secretary of State Victoria Nuland stated, “If Russia invades Ukraine, one way or another, Nord Stream 2 will not move forward.” On February 7, 2022, President Biden said, “If Russia invades… again, then there will be no longer a Nord Stream 2.” In February 2023, Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh published a report asserting that the pipelines were destroyed by the US as part of a covert operation. According to Hersh’s sources, the explosives were planted in June 2022 by US Navy divers under the guise of the BALTOPS 22 NATO exercise and were detonated three months later with a remote signal sent by a sonar buoy. It remains to be seen conclusively who ordered and carried out the attack, but the argument that Russia was behind it is looking increasingly tenuous. </document> <category> URW: Discrediting Ukraine: Discrediting Ukrainian government and officials and policies </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Throughout the text, several paragraphs claim that the Nord Stream pipeline was sabotaged by Ukrainian government officials, suggesting that they would have colluded with other countries to carry out the attack

EN_UA_029155.txt

URW: Discrediting Ukraine

URW: Discrediting Ukraine: Discrediting Ukrainian government and officials and policies

Several paragraphs report that behind the sabotage of the Nord Stream 2 there are the Ukrainian military and officials. The attempt to discredit Ukraine relies on declarations made by alleged officials of Western countries.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Head of German Intelligence Reveals Zelensky Behind Nord Stream Pipeline Attack The former head of German intelligence has revealed that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and President of Poland both collaborated to carry out the attack on the Nord Stream Pipelines. The Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipelines were sabotaged on 26 September 2022 after a series of underwater explosions and gas leaks. BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. You can unsubscribe any time. By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use Latest Video Modernity.news reports: Much of the legacy media initially blamed Russia for attack, claiming it was a false flag but offering no sensible reason as to why Moscow would target its own energy infrastructure. However, during an appearance on German broadcaster WELT-TV, August Hanning, who served as the head of Germany’s Federal Intelligence Service (BND) from 1998 to 2005, the attack was carried out at the behest of Zelensky and Andrzej Duda. According to Hanning, the act of sabotage occurred as a result of an “agreement between the highest officials in Ukraine and Poland.” “There were agreements between Zelensky and Duda to carry out the attack,” said Hanning. As we highlighted yesterday, Germany issued an arrest warrant for a Ukrainian diver believed to be involved in the attack on the Nord Stream pipelines, but Polish authorities failed to stop him at the border and he is now believed to be back in Ukraine. Berlin issued a European arrest warrant for Ukrainian citizen Volodymyr Z. after identifying him as the chief suspect for placing the explosives that destroyed the pipelines, but Polish authorities claimed they didn’t apprehend the suspect as a result of Berlin not including his name in a database of wanted persons. The pipeline attack was preceded by warnings from the White House that a Russian invasion of Ukraine would spell the end for Nord Stream 2. On January 27, 2022, Under-Secretary of State Victoria Nuland stated, “If Russia invades Ukraine, one way or another, Nord Stream 2 will not move forward.” On February 7, 2022, President Biden said, “If Russia invades… again, then there will be no longer a Nord Stream 2.” In February 2023, Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh published a report asserting that the pipelines were destroyed by the US as part of a covert operation. According to Hersh’s sources, the explosives were planted in June 2022 by US Navy divers under the guise of the BALTOPS 22 NATO exercise and were detonated three months later with a remote signal sent by a sonar buoy. It remains to be seen conclusively who ordered and carried out the attack, but the argument that Russia was behind it is looking increasingly tenuous. </document> <category> URW: Discrediting Ukraine: Discrediting Ukrainian government and officials and policies </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text criticises Ukrainian officials for allegedly being responsible of attacks against the Nord Stream pipeline.

EN_UA_029155.txt

URW: Discrediting Ukraine

URW: Discrediting Ukraine: Discrediting Ukrainian government and officials and policies

Several paragraphs report that behind the sabotage of the Nord Stream 2 there are the Ukrainian military and officials. The attempt to discredit Ukraine relies on declarations made by alleged officials of Western countries.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Head of German Intelligence Reveals Zelensky Behind Nord Stream Pipeline Attack The former head of German intelligence has revealed that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and President of Poland both collaborated to carry out the attack on the Nord Stream Pipelines. The Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipelines were sabotaged on 26 September 2022 after a series of underwater explosions and gas leaks. BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. You can unsubscribe any time. By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use Latest Video Modernity.news reports: Much of the legacy media initially blamed Russia for attack, claiming it was a false flag but offering no sensible reason as to why Moscow would target its own energy infrastructure. However, during an appearance on German broadcaster WELT-TV, August Hanning, who served as the head of Germany’s Federal Intelligence Service (BND) from 1998 to 2005, the attack was carried out at the behest of Zelensky and Andrzej Duda. According to Hanning, the act of sabotage occurred as a result of an “agreement between the highest officials in Ukraine and Poland.” “There were agreements between Zelensky and Duda to carry out the attack,” said Hanning. As we highlighted yesterday, Germany issued an arrest warrant for a Ukrainian diver believed to be involved in the attack on the Nord Stream pipelines, but Polish authorities failed to stop him at the border and he is now believed to be back in Ukraine. Berlin issued a European arrest warrant for Ukrainian citizen Volodymyr Z. after identifying him as the chief suspect for placing the explosives that destroyed the pipelines, but Polish authorities claimed they didn’t apprehend the suspect as a result of Berlin not including his name in a database of wanted persons. The pipeline attack was preceded by warnings from the White House that a Russian invasion of Ukraine would spell the end for Nord Stream 2. On January 27, 2022, Under-Secretary of State Victoria Nuland stated, “If Russia invades Ukraine, one way or another, Nord Stream 2 will not move forward.” On February 7, 2022, President Biden said, “If Russia invades… again, then there will be no longer a Nord Stream 2.” In February 2023, Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh published a report asserting that the pipelines were destroyed by the US as part of a covert operation. According to Hersh’s sources, the explosives were planted in June 2022 by US Navy divers under the guise of the BALTOPS 22 NATO exercise and were detonated three months later with a remote signal sent by a sonar buoy. It remains to be seen conclusively who ordered and carried out the attack, but the argument that Russia was behind it is looking increasingly tenuous. </document> <category> URW: Discrediting Ukraine: Discrediting Ukrainian government and officials and policies </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Article claiming that Ukraine attacked Nordstream pipeline. The article talks about how US intelligence was involved as well. Article seems to be portraying Ukraine as being the aggressor rather than the defender in the conflict with Russia.

EN_UA_029155.txt

URW: Discrediting Ukraine

URW: Discrediting Ukraine: Discrediting Ukrainian government and officials and policies

Several paragraphs report that behind the sabotage of the Nord Stream 2 there are the Ukrainian military and officials. The attempt to discredit Ukraine relies on declarations made by alleged officials of Western countries.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Head of German Intelligence Reveals Zelensky Behind Nord Stream Pipeline Attack The former head of German intelligence has revealed that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and President of Poland both collaborated to carry out the attack on the Nord Stream Pipelines. The Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipelines were sabotaged on 26 September 2022 after a series of underwater explosions and gas leaks. BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. You can unsubscribe any time. By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use Latest Video Modernity.news reports: Much of the legacy media initially blamed Russia for attack, claiming it was a false flag but offering no sensible reason as to why Moscow would target its own energy infrastructure. However, during an appearance on German broadcaster WELT-TV, August Hanning, who served as the head of Germany’s Federal Intelligence Service (BND) from 1998 to 2005, the attack was carried out at the behest of Zelensky and Andrzej Duda. According to Hanning, the act of sabotage occurred as a result of an “agreement between the highest officials in Ukraine and Poland.” “There were agreements between Zelensky and Duda to carry out the attack,” said Hanning. As we highlighted yesterday, Germany issued an arrest warrant for a Ukrainian diver believed to be involved in the attack on the Nord Stream pipelines, but Polish authorities failed to stop him at the border and he is now believed to be back in Ukraine. Berlin issued a European arrest warrant for Ukrainian citizen Volodymyr Z. after identifying him as the chief suspect for placing the explosives that destroyed the pipelines, but Polish authorities claimed they didn’t apprehend the suspect as a result of Berlin not including his name in a database of wanted persons. The pipeline attack was preceded by warnings from the White House that a Russian invasion of Ukraine would spell the end for Nord Stream 2. On January 27, 2022, Under-Secretary of State Victoria Nuland stated, “If Russia invades Ukraine, one way or another, Nord Stream 2 will not move forward.” On February 7, 2022, President Biden said, “If Russia invades… again, then there will be no longer a Nord Stream 2.” In February 2023, Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh published a report asserting that the pipelines were destroyed by the US as part of a covert operation. According to Hersh’s sources, the explosives were planted in June 2022 by US Navy divers under the guise of the BALTOPS 22 NATO exercise and were detonated three months later with a remote signal sent by a sonar buoy. It remains to be seen conclusively who ordered and carried out the attack, but the argument that Russia was behind it is looking increasingly tenuous. </document> <category> URW: Discrediting Ukraine: Discrediting Ukrainian government and officials and policies </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Several paragraphs together attribute the Nord Stream attack to Ukrainian government officials.

EN_UA_029155.txt

URW: Discrediting Ukraine

URW: Discrediting Ukraine: Discrediting Ukrainian government and officials and policies

Several paragraphs report that behind the sabotage of the Nord Stream 2 there are the Ukrainian military and officials. The attempt to discredit Ukraine relies on declarations made by alleged officials of Western countries.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Head of German Intelligence Reveals Zelensky Behind Nord Stream Pipeline Attack The former head of German intelligence has revealed that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and President of Poland both collaborated to carry out the attack on the Nord Stream Pipelines. The Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipelines were sabotaged on 26 September 2022 after a series of underwater explosions and gas leaks. BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. You can unsubscribe any time. By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use Latest Video Modernity.news reports: Much of the legacy media initially blamed Russia for attack, claiming it was a false flag but offering no sensible reason as to why Moscow would target its own energy infrastructure. However, during an appearance on German broadcaster WELT-TV, August Hanning, who served as the head of Germany’s Federal Intelligence Service (BND) from 1998 to 2005, the attack was carried out at the behest of Zelensky and Andrzej Duda. According to Hanning, the act of sabotage occurred as a result of an “agreement between the highest officials in Ukraine and Poland.” “There were agreements between Zelensky and Duda to carry out the attack,” said Hanning. As we highlighted yesterday, Germany issued an arrest warrant for a Ukrainian diver believed to be involved in the attack on the Nord Stream pipelines, but Polish authorities failed to stop him at the border and he is now believed to be back in Ukraine. Berlin issued a European arrest warrant for Ukrainian citizen Volodymyr Z. after identifying him as the chief suspect for placing the explosives that destroyed the pipelines, but Polish authorities claimed they didn’t apprehend the suspect as a result of Berlin not including his name in a database of wanted persons. The pipeline attack was preceded by warnings from the White House that a Russian invasion of Ukraine would spell the end for Nord Stream 2. On January 27, 2022, Under-Secretary of State Victoria Nuland stated, “If Russia invades Ukraine, one way or another, Nord Stream 2 will not move forward.” On February 7, 2022, President Biden said, “If Russia invades… again, then there will be no longer a Nord Stream 2.” In February 2023, Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh published a report asserting that the pipelines were destroyed by the US as part of a covert operation. According to Hersh’s sources, the explosives were planted in June 2022 by US Navy divers under the guise of the BALTOPS 22 NATO exercise and were detonated three months later with a remote signal sent by a sonar buoy. It remains to be seen conclusively who ordered and carried out the attack, but the argument that Russia was behind it is looking increasingly tenuous. </document> <category> URW: Discrediting Ukraine: Discrediting Ukrainian government and officials and policies </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Several paragraphs claim that officials within the Ukrainian government have been complicit in attack on Nord Stream pipeline.

EN_UA_029155.txt

URW: Discrediting Ukraine

URW: Discrediting Ukraine: Discrediting Ukrainian government and officials and policies

Several paragraphs report that behind the sabotage of the Nord Stream 2 there are the Ukrainian military and officials. The attempt to discredit Ukraine relies on declarations made by alleged officials of Western countries.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Russia-Ukraine war map: Where are Russian troops positioned around Ukraine? RUSSIA is demanding the surrender of Mariupol, while trying to position themselves within range of crucial cities. At least eight civilians have died in a Russian attack on a large shopping centre just outside the Ukraine's capital Kyiv. Where are Russian troops in Ukraine now? An estimate of 190,000 Russian troops have been deployed in and around Ukraine for the invasion. Russia has admitted around 10,000 of their troops have been killed. Despite peace talks on the Belarusian border, the Ukraine war rages on with no hint of whether Russian President Vladimir Putin will withdraw his troops. Russia has military control over much of Ukraine's southern regions but is fighting to take control of Mariupol. read more on the ukraine war The city is surrounded by Russian forces but Ukraine refuses to surrender. Ukrainian forces are holding on to important cities like Kharkiv and Kyiv as well as Odesa, which is a crucial connection to supplies. Capital Kyiv remains under Ukrainian control with the nearest Russian troops about 15 miles from the city centre. Troops attacked the Retroville mall just outside Kyiv in the Podilskyi district, killing eight civilians. In the north of the country, Russian troops are attempting to surround the city of Sumy. Many civilians have joined Ukrainian forces in the fight for their homeland. RUSSIA LATEST Which parts of Ukraine has Russia invaded? Russia has made large sweeps in the south of Ukraine, using Crimea and the separatist supporters in Donetsk and Luhansk. Troops moved into the Kherson region from Crimea - a territory that Russia annexed from Ukraine in 2014. Kherson and Melitopol areas of Ukraine are under control of Russian forces. There is strong Russian presence in Chernobyl and the surrounding area. Northern cities of Chernihiv and Konotop, which are closest to the Russian and Belarusian borders, have also been taken. 🔵 Read our Russia - Ukraine live blog for the very latest updates Why has Russia invaded Ukraine? Unrest in the Donbas region began in 2014 after the Russian annexation of Crimea. Pro-Russian demonstrations escalated into fighting with the Ukraine government forces. The Minsk agreement of 2015 – between the separatist leaders, Ukraine, Russia, France and Germany – sought to end fighting in the region but without success. The much feared Russian advance began in the early hours on February 21, 2022, soon after Putin announced he recognised Luhansk and Donetsk as independent states in a bombastic TV address. Joe Biden and Boris Johnson condemned the move as an "invasion" and slapped sanctions on Russian banks and Putin's billionaire cronies. READ MORE SUN STORIES Read More on The Sun Many countries and private companies have also sanctioned Russia and Russian oligarchs, such as Chelsea FC owner Roman Abramovich. The big sanctions for the billionaires has been the seizures of many of their superyachts. </document> <category> URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: Diplomacy does/will not work </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Throughout several paragraphs the text questions the success of diplomatic initiatives aimed at finding a solution for the conflict. It highlights several occasions where these initiatives failed. In doing so the text adopts a narrative emphasising the failure of international diplomacy.

EN_UA_001032.txt

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: Diplomacy does/will not work

The article reports a series of military events regarding the invasion of Russia. Towards the end, the failure of the Minsk agreement is attributed as the principal failure for the decision of Russia to invade.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Russia-Ukraine war map: Where are Russian troops positioned around Ukraine? RUSSIA is demanding the surrender of Mariupol, while trying to position themselves within range of crucial cities. At least eight civilians have died in a Russian attack on a large shopping centre just outside the Ukraine's capital Kyiv. Where are Russian troops in Ukraine now? An estimate of 190,000 Russian troops have been deployed in and around Ukraine for the invasion. Russia has admitted around 10,000 of their troops have been killed. Despite peace talks on the Belarusian border, the Ukraine war rages on with no hint of whether Russian President Vladimir Putin will withdraw his troops. Russia has military control over much of Ukraine's southern regions but is fighting to take control of Mariupol. read more on the ukraine war The city is surrounded by Russian forces but Ukraine refuses to surrender. Ukrainian forces are holding on to important cities like Kharkiv and Kyiv as well as Odesa, which is a crucial connection to supplies. Capital Kyiv remains under Ukrainian control with the nearest Russian troops about 15 miles from the city centre. Troops attacked the Retroville mall just outside Kyiv in the Podilskyi district, killing eight civilians. In the north of the country, Russian troops are attempting to surround the city of Sumy. Many civilians have joined Ukrainian forces in the fight for their homeland. RUSSIA LATEST Which parts of Ukraine has Russia invaded? Russia has made large sweeps in the south of Ukraine, using Crimea and the separatist supporters in Donetsk and Luhansk. Troops moved into the Kherson region from Crimea - a territory that Russia annexed from Ukraine in 2014. Kherson and Melitopol areas of Ukraine are under control of Russian forces. There is strong Russian presence in Chernobyl and the surrounding area. Northern cities of Chernihiv and Konotop, which are closest to the Russian and Belarusian borders, have also been taken. 🔵 Read our Russia - Ukraine live blog for the very latest updates Why has Russia invaded Ukraine? Unrest in the Donbas region began in 2014 after the Russian annexation of Crimea. Pro-Russian demonstrations escalated into fighting with the Ukraine government forces. The Minsk agreement of 2015 – between the separatist leaders, Ukraine, Russia, France and Germany – sought to end fighting in the region but without success. The much feared Russian advance began in the early hours on February 21, 2022, soon after Putin announced he recognised Luhansk and Donetsk as independent states in a bombastic TV address. Joe Biden and Boris Johnson condemned the move as an "invasion" and slapped sanctions on Russian banks and Putin's billionaire cronies. READ MORE SUN STORIES Read More on The Sun Many countries and private companies have also sanctioned Russia and Russian oligarchs, such as Chelsea FC owner Roman Abramovich. The big sanctions for the billionaires has been the seizures of many of their superyachts. </document> <category> URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: Diplomacy does/will not work </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Article reports several failed peace attempts and ongoing war situation in Ukraine. Russian presence is described as occupying the Southern part of Ukraine. Ukraine is reported as having difficulties holding cities

EN_UA_001032.txt

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: Diplomacy does/will not work

The article reports a series of military events regarding the invasion of Russia. Towards the end, the failure of the Minsk agreement is attributed as the principal failure for the decision of Russia to invade.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Russia-Ukraine war map: Where are Russian troops positioned around Ukraine? RUSSIA is demanding the surrender of Mariupol, while trying to position themselves within range of crucial cities. At least eight civilians have died in a Russian attack on a large shopping centre just outside the Ukraine's capital Kyiv. Where are Russian troops in Ukraine now? An estimate of 190,000 Russian troops have been deployed in and around Ukraine for the invasion. Russia has admitted around 10,000 of their troops have been killed. Despite peace talks on the Belarusian border, the Ukraine war rages on with no hint of whether Russian President Vladimir Putin will withdraw his troops. Russia has military control over much of Ukraine's southern regions but is fighting to take control of Mariupol. read more on the ukraine war The city is surrounded by Russian forces but Ukraine refuses to surrender. Ukrainian forces are holding on to important cities like Kharkiv and Kyiv as well as Odesa, which is a crucial connection to supplies. Capital Kyiv remains under Ukrainian control with the nearest Russian troops about 15 miles from the city centre. Troops attacked the Retroville mall just outside Kyiv in the Podilskyi district, killing eight civilians. In the north of the country, Russian troops are attempting to surround the city of Sumy. Many civilians have joined Ukrainian forces in the fight for their homeland. RUSSIA LATEST Which parts of Ukraine has Russia invaded? Russia has made large sweeps in the south of Ukraine, using Crimea and the separatist supporters in Donetsk and Luhansk. Troops moved into the Kherson region from Crimea - a territory that Russia annexed from Ukraine in 2014. Kherson and Melitopol areas of Ukraine are under control of Russian forces. There is strong Russian presence in Chernobyl and the surrounding area. Northern cities of Chernihiv and Konotop, which are closest to the Russian and Belarusian borders, have also been taken. 🔵 Read our Russia - Ukraine live blog for the very latest updates Why has Russia invaded Ukraine? Unrest in the Donbas region began in 2014 after the Russian annexation of Crimea. Pro-Russian demonstrations escalated into fighting with the Ukraine government forces. The Minsk agreement of 2015 – between the separatist leaders, Ukraine, Russia, France and Germany – sought to end fighting in the region but without success. The much feared Russian advance began in the early hours on February 21, 2022, soon after Putin announced he recognised Luhansk and Donetsk as independent states in a bombastic TV address. Joe Biden and Boris Johnson condemned the move as an "invasion" and slapped sanctions on Russian banks and Putin's billionaire cronies. READ MORE SUN STORIES Read More on The Sun Many countries and private companies have also sanctioned Russia and Russian oligarchs, such as Chelsea FC owner Roman Abramovich. The big sanctions for the billionaires has been the seizures of many of their superyachts. </document> <category> URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: Diplomacy does/will not work </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Multiple paragraphs question the effectiveness of Minsk agreements signed between Ukraine and Russian proxies, pointing out that they have not lead to anything good. The text questions the rationality of using diplomacy as a solution to conflict, arguing that Ukraine has no real possibility to negotiate with Russia.

EN_UA_001032.txt

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: Diplomacy does/will not work

The article reports a series of military events regarding the invasion of Russia. Towards the end, the failure of the Minsk agreement is attributed as the principal failure for the decision of Russia to invade.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Russia-Ukraine war map: Where are Russian troops positioned around Ukraine? RUSSIA is demanding the surrender of Mariupol, while trying to position themselves within range of crucial cities. At least eight civilians have died in a Russian attack on a large shopping centre just outside the Ukraine's capital Kyiv. Where are Russian troops in Ukraine now? An estimate of 190,000 Russian troops have been deployed in and around Ukraine for the invasion. Russia has admitted around 10,000 of their troops have been killed. Despite peace talks on the Belarusian border, the Ukraine war rages on with no hint of whether Russian President Vladimir Putin will withdraw his troops. Russia has military control over much of Ukraine's southern regions but is fighting to take control of Mariupol. read more on the ukraine war The city is surrounded by Russian forces but Ukraine refuses to surrender. Ukrainian forces are holding on to important cities like Kharkiv and Kyiv as well as Odesa, which is a crucial connection to supplies. Capital Kyiv remains under Ukrainian control with the nearest Russian troops about 15 miles from the city centre. Troops attacked the Retroville mall just outside Kyiv in the Podilskyi district, killing eight civilians. In the north of the country, Russian troops are attempting to surround the city of Sumy. Many civilians have joined Ukrainian forces in the fight for their homeland. RUSSIA LATEST Which parts of Ukraine has Russia invaded? Russia has made large sweeps in the south of Ukraine, using Crimea and the separatist supporters in Donetsk and Luhansk. Troops moved into the Kherson region from Crimea - a territory that Russia annexed from Ukraine in 2014. Kherson and Melitopol areas of Ukraine are under control of Russian forces. There is strong Russian presence in Chernobyl and the surrounding area. Northern cities of Chernihiv and Konotop, which are closest to the Russian and Belarusian borders, have also been taken. 🔵 Read our Russia - Ukraine live blog for the very latest updates Why has Russia invaded Ukraine? Unrest in the Donbas region began in 2014 after the Russian annexation of Crimea. Pro-Russian demonstrations escalated into fighting with the Ukraine government forces. The Minsk agreement of 2015 – between the separatist leaders, Ukraine, Russia, France and Germany – sought to end fighting in the region but without success. The much feared Russian advance began in the early hours on February 21, 2022, soon after Putin announced he recognised Luhansk and Donetsk as independent states in a bombastic TV address. Joe Biden and Boris Johnson condemned the move as an "invasion" and slapped sanctions on Russian banks and Putin's billionaire cronies. READ MORE SUN STORIES Read More on The Sun Many countries and private companies have also sanctioned Russia and Russian oligarchs, such as Chelsea FC owner Roman Abramovich. The big sanctions for the billionaires has been the seizures of many of their superyachts. </document> <category> URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: Diplomacy does/will not work </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The article quotes Ukrainian official saying that Russian invasion of Ukraine failed despite peace talks. The author conveys a narrative saying that Ukrainian forces are holding on important cities like Kyiv as well as Kharkiv, implying the success of Ukrainian defense

EN_UA_001032.txt

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: Diplomacy does/will not work

The article reports a series of military events regarding the invasion of Russia. Towards the end, the failure of the Minsk agreement is attributed as the principal failure for the decision of Russia to invade.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Russia-Ukraine war map: Where are Russian troops positioned around Ukraine? RUSSIA is demanding the surrender of Mariupol, while trying to position themselves within range of crucial cities. At least eight civilians have died in a Russian attack on a large shopping centre just outside the Ukraine's capital Kyiv. Where are Russian troops in Ukraine now? An estimate of 190,000 Russian troops have been deployed in and around Ukraine for the invasion. Russia has admitted around 10,000 of their troops have been killed. Despite peace talks on the Belarusian border, the Ukraine war rages on with no hint of whether Russian President Vladimir Putin will withdraw his troops. Russia has military control over much of Ukraine's southern regions but is fighting to take control of Mariupol. read more on the ukraine war The city is surrounded by Russian forces but Ukraine refuses to surrender. Ukrainian forces are holding on to important cities like Kharkiv and Kyiv as well as Odesa, which is a crucial connection to supplies. Capital Kyiv remains under Ukrainian control with the nearest Russian troops about 15 miles from the city centre. Troops attacked the Retroville mall just outside Kyiv in the Podilskyi district, killing eight civilians. In the north of the country, Russian troops are attempting to surround the city of Sumy. Many civilians have joined Ukrainian forces in the fight for their homeland. RUSSIA LATEST Which parts of Ukraine has Russia invaded? Russia has made large sweeps in the south of Ukraine, using Crimea and the separatist supporters in Donetsk and Luhansk. Troops moved into the Kherson region from Crimea - a territory that Russia annexed from Ukraine in 2014. Kherson and Melitopol areas of Ukraine are under control of Russian forces. There is strong Russian presence in Chernobyl and the surrounding area. Northern cities of Chernihiv and Konotop, which are closest to the Russian and Belarusian borders, have also been taken. 🔵 Read our Russia - Ukraine live blog for the very latest updates Why has Russia invaded Ukraine? Unrest in the Donbas region began in 2014 after the Russian annexation of Crimea. Pro-Russian demonstrations escalated into fighting with the Ukraine government forces. The Minsk agreement of 2015 – between the separatist leaders, Ukraine, Russia, France and Germany – sought to end fighting in the region but without success. The much feared Russian advance began in the early hours on February 21, 2022, soon after Putin announced he recognised Luhansk and Donetsk as independent states in a bombastic TV address. Joe Biden and Boris Johnson condemned the move as an "invasion" and slapped sanctions on Russian banks and Putin's billionaire cronies. READ MORE SUN STORIES Read More on The Sun Many countries and private companies have also sanctioned Russia and Russian oligarchs, such as Chelsea FC owner Roman Abramovich. The big sanctions for the billionaires has been the seizures of many of their superyachts. </document> <category> URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: Diplomacy does/will not work </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Several paragraphs highlight the failure of the Minsk agreement as well as the lack of success of international efforts to stop Russian invasion of Ukraine. This is done in a context criticising Ukraine and suggesting the country is in fact responsible for the war

EN_UA_001032.txt

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: Diplomacy does/will not work

The article reports a series of military events regarding the invasion of Russia. Towards the end, the failure of the Minsk agreement is attributed as the principal failure for the decision of Russia to invade.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Russia Prepares For A War With NATO by Mac Slavo, SHTF Plan: Russia is preparing for a war with NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) and the West. The preparations are for a “long-term confrontation”. A growing number of Western rulers have also warned of a military threat from Russia to countries along the eastern flank of NATO, calling for Europe to get prepared by rearming. The chief of the intelligence service said the assessment was based on Russian plans to double the number of forces stationed along its border with NATO members Finland and the Baltic States of Estonia, Lithuania, and Latvia. “Russia has chosen a path which is a long-term confrontation … and the Kremlin is probably anticipating a possible conflict with NATO within the next decade or so,” Kaupo Rosin told reporters at the release of Estonia’s national security threats report, according to a report by The New York Post. TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/ Rosin claimed that a military attack by Russia is “highly unlikely” in the short term, partly because Russia has to keep troops in Ukraine, and that would be unlikely if the Russian buildup of forces was matched in Europe. “If we are not prepared, the likelihood (of a military Russian attack) would be much higher than without any preparation,” Rosin added. Estonia and the other Baltic States have increased their military spending to over 2% of the value of their economies after Russia annexed Crimea in 2014, and NATO allies have raised their presence in those countries. Germany plans to have 4,800 combat-ready troops in the region by 2027, in its first permanent foreign deployment since World War Two, and Rosin said NATO and its allies were moving in the right direction to counter the Russian threat. –The New York Post. Russia has repeatedly warned that it will go to war with NATO if the West’s weapons defeat Russia, or lethal aid is sent to Ukraine. One could argue that the West has crossed that line, but Russia has yet to follow through with an attack on NATO. Russia Warns NATO A Nuclear War Will Ensue If Western Weapons Defeat Russia The bad news is that Russia’s ability to provide ammunition to its troops is continuing to outweigh Ukraine’s. Rosin said that unless Western support is sustained or increased, Ukraine is unlikely to be able to change the situation on the battlefield. </document> <category> URW: Amplifying war-related fears: NATO should/will directly intervene </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text has several paragraphs underlining that Russia is preparing for a war with NATO, that the Kremlin anticipate a possible conflict with NATO in the upcoming decade, as well as claiming that there is a real possibility that NATO will directly intervene in Ukraine conflict.

EN_UA_104152.txt

URW: Amplifying war-related fears

URW: Amplifying war-related fears: NATO should/will directly intervene

The text repeatedly suggest that a confrontation between NATO and Russia will happen sooner or later. According to the text, the confrontation would be the outcome of NATO's support to Ukraine as well

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Russia Prepares For A War With NATO by Mac Slavo, SHTF Plan: Russia is preparing for a war with NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) and the West. The preparations are for a “long-term confrontation”. A growing number of Western rulers have also warned of a military threat from Russia to countries along the eastern flank of NATO, calling for Europe to get prepared by rearming. The chief of the intelligence service said the assessment was based on Russian plans to double the number of forces stationed along its border with NATO members Finland and the Baltic States of Estonia, Lithuania, and Latvia. “Russia has chosen a path which is a long-term confrontation … and the Kremlin is probably anticipating a possible conflict with NATO within the next decade or so,” Kaupo Rosin told reporters at the release of Estonia’s national security threats report, according to a report by The New York Post. TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/ Rosin claimed that a military attack by Russia is “highly unlikely” in the short term, partly because Russia has to keep troops in Ukraine, and that would be unlikely if the Russian buildup of forces was matched in Europe. “If we are not prepared, the likelihood (of a military Russian attack) would be much higher than without any preparation,” Rosin added. Estonia and the other Baltic States have increased their military spending to over 2% of the value of their economies after Russia annexed Crimea in 2014, and NATO allies have raised their presence in those countries. Germany plans to have 4,800 combat-ready troops in the region by 2027, in its first permanent foreign deployment since World War Two, and Rosin said NATO and its allies were moving in the right direction to counter the Russian threat. –The New York Post. Russia has repeatedly warned that it will go to war with NATO if the West’s weapons defeat Russia, or lethal aid is sent to Ukraine. One could argue that the West has crossed that line, but Russia has yet to follow through with an attack on NATO. Russia Warns NATO A Nuclear War Will Ensue If Western Weapons Defeat Russia The bad news is that Russia’s ability to provide ammunition to its troops is continuing to outweigh Ukraine’s. Rosin said that unless Western support is sustained or increased, Ukraine is unlikely to be able to change the situation on the battlefield. </document> <category> URW: Amplifying war-related fears: NATO should/will directly intervene </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The article talks about the possibility of a confrontation between Russia and NATO. The article argues that Russia wants to increase its military presence near the border of Finland and the Baltic States, and that it is likely to happen soon

EN_UA_104152.txt

URW: Amplifying war-related fears

URW: Amplifying war-related fears: NATO should/will directly intervene

The text repeatedly suggest that a confrontation between NATO and Russia will happen sooner or later. According to the text, the confrontation would be the outcome of NATO's support to Ukraine as well

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Russia Prepares For A War With NATO by Mac Slavo, SHTF Plan: Russia is preparing for a war with NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) and the West. The preparations are for a “long-term confrontation”. A growing number of Western rulers have also warned of a military threat from Russia to countries along the eastern flank of NATO, calling for Europe to get prepared by rearming. The chief of the intelligence service said the assessment was based on Russian plans to double the number of forces stationed along its border with NATO members Finland and the Baltic States of Estonia, Lithuania, and Latvia. “Russia has chosen a path which is a long-term confrontation … and the Kremlin is probably anticipating a possible conflict with NATO within the next decade or so,” Kaupo Rosin told reporters at the release of Estonia’s national security threats report, according to a report by The New York Post. TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/ Rosin claimed that a military attack by Russia is “highly unlikely” in the short term, partly because Russia has to keep troops in Ukraine, and that would be unlikely if the Russian buildup of forces was matched in Europe. “If we are not prepared, the likelihood (of a military Russian attack) would be much higher than without any preparation,” Rosin added. Estonia and the other Baltic States have increased their military spending to over 2% of the value of their economies after Russia annexed Crimea in 2014, and NATO allies have raised their presence in those countries. Germany plans to have 4,800 combat-ready troops in the region by 2027, in its first permanent foreign deployment since World War Two, and Rosin said NATO and its allies were moving in the right direction to counter the Russian threat. –The New York Post. Russia has repeatedly warned that it will go to war with NATO if the West’s weapons defeat Russia, or lethal aid is sent to Ukraine. One could argue that the West has crossed that line, but Russia has yet to follow through with an attack on NATO. Russia Warns NATO A Nuclear War Will Ensue If Western Weapons Defeat Russia The bad news is that Russia’s ability to provide ammunition to its troops is continuing to outweigh Ukraine’s. Rosin said that unless Western support is sustained or increased, Ukraine is unlikely to be able to change the situation on the battlefield. </document> <category> URW: Amplifying war-related fears: NATO should/will directly intervene </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The article talks about the probability of NATO interfering militarily in the war between Russia and Ukraine. The main argument is that the West crossed the red line when it started arming Ukraine and if it keeps doing it, the probability of military interference increases

EN_UA_104152.txt

URW: Amplifying war-related fears

URW: Amplifying war-related fears: NATO should/will directly intervene

The text repeatedly suggest that a confrontation between NATO and Russia will happen sooner or later. According to the text, the confrontation would be the outcome of NATO's support to Ukraine as well

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Russia Prepares For A War With NATO by Mac Slavo, SHTF Plan: Russia is preparing for a war with NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) and the West. The preparations are for a “long-term confrontation”. A growing number of Western rulers have also warned of a military threat from Russia to countries along the eastern flank of NATO, calling for Europe to get prepared by rearming. The chief of the intelligence service said the assessment was based on Russian plans to double the number of forces stationed along its border with NATO members Finland and the Baltic States of Estonia, Lithuania, and Latvia. “Russia has chosen a path which is a long-term confrontation … and the Kremlin is probably anticipating a possible conflict with NATO within the next decade or so,” Kaupo Rosin told reporters at the release of Estonia’s national security threats report, according to a report by The New York Post. TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/ Rosin claimed that a military attack by Russia is “highly unlikely” in the short term, partly because Russia has to keep troops in Ukraine, and that would be unlikely if the Russian buildup of forces was matched in Europe. “If we are not prepared, the likelihood (of a military Russian attack) would be much higher than without any preparation,” Rosin added. Estonia and the other Baltic States have increased their military spending to over 2% of the value of their economies after Russia annexed Crimea in 2014, and NATO allies have raised their presence in those countries. Germany plans to have 4,800 combat-ready troops in the region by 2027, in its first permanent foreign deployment since World War Two, and Rosin said NATO and its allies were moving in the right direction to counter the Russian threat. –The New York Post. Russia has repeatedly warned that it will go to war with NATO if the West’s weapons defeat Russia, or lethal aid is sent to Ukraine. One could argue that the West has crossed that line, but Russia has yet to follow through with an attack on NATO. Russia Warns NATO A Nuclear War Will Ensue If Western Weapons Defeat Russia The bad news is that Russia’s ability to provide ammunition to its troops is continuing to outweigh Ukraine’s. Rosin said that unless Western support is sustained or increased, Ukraine is unlikely to be able to change the situation on the battlefield. </document> <category> URW: Amplifying war-related fears: NATO should/will directly intervene </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The author is quoting officials in order to convey a sense that Western countries should be fearing a potential military confrontation with Russia.

EN_UA_104152.txt

URW: Amplifying war-related fears

URW: Amplifying war-related fears: NATO should/will directly intervene

The text repeatedly suggest that a confrontation between NATO and Russia will happen sooner or later. According to the text, the confrontation would be the outcome of NATO's support to Ukraine as well

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Russia Prepares For A War With NATO by Mac Slavo, SHTF Plan: Russia is preparing for a war with NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) and the West. The preparations are for a “long-term confrontation”. A growing number of Western rulers have also warned of a military threat from Russia to countries along the eastern flank of NATO, calling for Europe to get prepared by rearming. The chief of the intelligence service said the assessment was based on Russian plans to double the number of forces stationed along its border with NATO members Finland and the Baltic States of Estonia, Lithuania, and Latvia. “Russia has chosen a path which is a long-term confrontation … and the Kremlin is probably anticipating a possible conflict with NATO within the next decade or so,” Kaupo Rosin told reporters at the release of Estonia’s national security threats report, according to a report by The New York Post. TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/ Rosin claimed that a military attack by Russia is “highly unlikely” in the short term, partly because Russia has to keep troops in Ukraine, and that would be unlikely if the Russian buildup of forces was matched in Europe. “If we are not prepared, the likelihood (of a military Russian attack) would be much higher than without any preparation,” Rosin added. Estonia and the other Baltic States have increased their military spending to over 2% of the value of their economies after Russia annexed Crimea in 2014, and NATO allies have raised their presence in those countries. Germany plans to have 4,800 combat-ready troops in the region by 2027, in its first permanent foreign deployment since World War Two, and Rosin said NATO and its allies were moving in the right direction to counter the Russian threat. –The New York Post. Russia has repeatedly warned that it will go to war with NATO if the West’s weapons defeat Russia, or lethal aid is sent to Ukraine. One could argue that the West has crossed that line, but Russia has yet to follow through with an attack on NATO. Russia Warns NATO A Nuclear War Will Ensue If Western Weapons Defeat Russia The bad news is that Russia’s ability to provide ammunition to its troops is continuing to outweigh Ukraine’s. Rosin said that unless Western support is sustained or increased, Ukraine is unlikely to be able to change the situation on the battlefield. </document> <category> URW: Amplifying war-related fears: NATO should/will directly intervene </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Article quoting Russian officials suggesting that NATO will eventually be directly involved in the conflict with Russia, and claiming that such scenario would lead to a nuclear war

EN_UA_104152.txt

URW: Amplifying war-related fears

URW: Amplifying war-related fears: NATO should/will directly intervene

The text repeatedly suggest that a confrontation between NATO and Russia will happen sooner or later. According to the text, the confrontation would be the outcome of NATO's support to Ukraine as well

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Oil companies are killing the planet. Now they want to sell us a fake solution? Letters to the Editor: Oil companies are killing the planet. Now they want to sell us a fake solution? To the editor: Let’s recognize “carbon management” for what it is — a fossil fuel industry euphemism for commodifying pollution and providing life support to this dirty industry. While urgent action is needed to address the climate emergency, carbon capture is not a real solution. (“Will storing CO2 in old oil fields slow global warming? First California plan nears approval,” Jan. 14) The process in question requires vast amounts of energy and water. The presence of oil wells and pipelines can result in dangerous and potentially deadly leaks. That’s especially true of improperly plugged wells in the oilfields that companies like California Resources Corp. want to use as carbon dumping grounds. Carbon capture and storage projects divert funds away from what is truly needed: a just transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy such as wind and rooftop solar. Rather than marking “a drastic transformation for fossil fuel companies” and communities, as oil industry supporters claim, carbon management is nothing more than corporate greenwashing intended to keep these polluting companies in business. Victoria Bogdan Tejeda, Oakland The writer is a staff attorney with the Center for Biological Diversity. .. To the editor: Let me see if I understand this correctly. California Resources Corp. wants to utilize its depleted oil fields to store carbon emissions deep underground. This company polluted California for decades, for profit, and now it wants to utilize the same ground that is basically a wasteland of little to no value to store carbon emissions that resulted from the extraction of its product in the first place. The company made unbelievable amounts of money extracting fossil fuels that have resulted in the loss of many lives through their detrimental effects on the environment. Now, it wants to be part of the solution by profiting from the removal of the very same environmental toxins. I think California Resources Corp. could pay for this sequestration itself in an attempt to mitigate the horrid effects it’s had on the human population over the decades. But then again, there would be no profit in that. Jonathon Baker, Riverside .. To the editor: Since humans are emitting 40 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide each year, it would take about 27,000 such places with similar equipment just to keep up with global output. </document> <category> CC: Criticism of climate policies: Climate policies are only for profit </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The article presents a campaign against climate policies about CO2 emission control as companies which profit from them have to pay for the damages that fossil fuels extraction caused.

EN_CC_100066.txt

CC: Criticism of climate policies

CC: Criticism of climate policies: Climate policies are only for profit

The text presents multiple paragraphs arguing that climate policies such as the Carbon Management are only favoring oil companies, allowing them to make profit while at the same time not effectively tackle pollution and CO2 emissions

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Oil companies are killing the planet. Now they want to sell us a fake solution? Letters to the Editor: Oil companies are killing the planet. Now they want to sell us a fake solution? To the editor: Let’s recognize “carbon management” for what it is — a fossil fuel industry euphemism for commodifying pollution and providing life support to this dirty industry. While urgent action is needed to address the climate emergency, carbon capture is not a real solution. (“Will storing CO2 in old oil fields slow global warming? First California plan nears approval,” Jan. 14) The process in question requires vast amounts of energy and water. The presence of oil wells and pipelines can result in dangerous and potentially deadly leaks. That’s especially true of improperly plugged wells in the oilfields that companies like California Resources Corp. want to use as carbon dumping grounds. Carbon capture and storage projects divert funds away from what is truly needed: a just transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy such as wind and rooftop solar. Rather than marking “a drastic transformation for fossil fuel companies” and communities, as oil industry supporters claim, carbon management is nothing more than corporate greenwashing intended to keep these polluting companies in business. Victoria Bogdan Tejeda, Oakland The writer is a staff attorney with the Center for Biological Diversity. .. To the editor: Let me see if I understand this correctly. California Resources Corp. wants to utilize its depleted oil fields to store carbon emissions deep underground. This company polluted California for decades, for profit, and now it wants to utilize the same ground that is basically a wasteland of little to no value to store carbon emissions that resulted from the extraction of its product in the first place. The company made unbelievable amounts of money extracting fossil fuels that have resulted in the loss of many lives through their detrimental effects on the environment. Now, it wants to be part of the solution by profiting from the removal of the very same environmental toxins. I think California Resources Corp. could pay for this sequestration itself in an attempt to mitigate the horrid effects it’s had on the human population over the decades. But then again, there would be no profit in that. Jonathon Baker, Riverside .. To the editor: Since humans are emitting 40 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide each year, it would take about 27,000 such places with similar equipment just to keep up with global output. </document> <category> CC: Criticism of climate policies: Climate policies are only for profit </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Several paragraphs present climate policies as inefficient since they rely on carbon capture technologies that are ineffective and at the same time allow oil companies to make profit while keeping polluting

EN_CC_100066.txt

CC: Criticism of climate policies

CC: Criticism of climate policies: Climate policies are only for profit

The text presents multiple paragraphs arguing that climate policies such as the Carbon Management are only favoring oil companies, allowing them to make profit while at the same time not effectively tackle pollution and CO2 emissions

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Oil companies are killing the planet. Now they want to sell us a fake solution? Letters to the Editor: Oil companies are killing the planet. Now they want to sell us a fake solution? To the editor: Let’s recognize “carbon management” for what it is — a fossil fuel industry euphemism for commodifying pollution and providing life support to this dirty industry. While urgent action is needed to address the climate emergency, carbon capture is not a real solution. (“Will storing CO2 in old oil fields slow global warming? First California plan nears approval,” Jan. 14) The process in question requires vast amounts of energy and water. The presence of oil wells and pipelines can result in dangerous and potentially deadly leaks. That’s especially true of improperly plugged wells in the oilfields that companies like California Resources Corp. want to use as carbon dumping grounds. Carbon capture and storage projects divert funds away from what is truly needed: a just transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy such as wind and rooftop solar. Rather than marking “a drastic transformation for fossil fuel companies” and communities, as oil industry supporters claim, carbon management is nothing more than corporate greenwashing intended to keep these polluting companies in business. Victoria Bogdan Tejeda, Oakland The writer is a staff attorney with the Center for Biological Diversity. .. To the editor: Let me see if I understand this correctly. California Resources Corp. wants to utilize its depleted oil fields to store carbon emissions deep underground. This company polluted California for decades, for profit, and now it wants to utilize the same ground that is basically a wasteland of little to no value to store carbon emissions that resulted from the extraction of its product in the first place. The company made unbelievable amounts of money extracting fossil fuels that have resulted in the loss of many lives through their detrimental effects on the environment. Now, it wants to be part of the solution by profiting from the removal of the very same environmental toxins. I think California Resources Corp. could pay for this sequestration itself in an attempt to mitigate the horrid effects it’s had on the human population over the decades. But then again, there would be no profit in that. Jonathon Baker, Riverside .. To the editor: Since humans are emitting 40 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide each year, it would take about 27,000 such places with similar equipment just to keep up with global output. </document> <category> CC: Criticism of climate policies: Climate policies are only for profit </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Throughout all the text, climate policies are depicted as not real solutions for climate change and actually being just a way for companies to make profit. These companies have been making profit from extracting fossil fuels and now they want to be part of the solution for the climate crisis without truly being effective.

EN_CC_100066.txt

CC: Criticism of climate policies

CC: Criticism of climate policies: Climate policies are only for profit

The text presents multiple paragraphs arguing that climate policies such as the Carbon Management are only favoring oil companies, allowing them to make profit while at the same time not effectively tackle pollution and CO2 emissions

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Oil companies are killing the planet. Now they want to sell us a fake solution? Letters to the Editor: Oil companies are killing the planet. Now they want to sell us a fake solution? To the editor: Let’s recognize “carbon management” for what it is — a fossil fuel industry euphemism for commodifying pollution and providing life support to this dirty industry. While urgent action is needed to address the climate emergency, carbon capture is not a real solution. (“Will storing CO2 in old oil fields slow global warming? First California plan nears approval,” Jan. 14) The process in question requires vast amounts of energy and water. The presence of oil wells and pipelines can result in dangerous and potentially deadly leaks. That’s especially true of improperly plugged wells in the oilfields that companies like California Resources Corp. want to use as carbon dumping grounds. Carbon capture and storage projects divert funds away from what is truly needed: a just transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy such as wind and rooftop solar. Rather than marking “a drastic transformation for fossil fuel companies” and communities, as oil industry supporters claim, carbon management is nothing more than corporate greenwashing intended to keep these polluting companies in business. Victoria Bogdan Tejeda, Oakland The writer is a staff attorney with the Center for Biological Diversity. .. To the editor: Let me see if I understand this correctly. California Resources Corp. wants to utilize its depleted oil fields to store carbon emissions deep underground. This company polluted California for decades, for profit, and now it wants to utilize the same ground that is basically a wasteland of little to no value to store carbon emissions that resulted from the extraction of its product in the first place. The company made unbelievable amounts of money extracting fossil fuels that have resulted in the loss of many lives through their detrimental effects on the environment. Now, it wants to be part of the solution by profiting from the removal of the very same environmental toxins. I think California Resources Corp. could pay for this sequestration itself in an attempt to mitigate the horrid effects it’s had on the human population over the decades. But then again, there would be no profit in that. Jonathon Baker, Riverside .. To the editor: Since humans are emitting 40 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide each year, it would take about 27,000 such places with similar equipment just to keep up with global output. </document> <category> CC: Criticism of climate policies: Climate policies are only for profit </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text presents multiple paragraphs arguing that climate policies such as the Carbon Capture are ineffective because they are only favorizing oil companies that are allowed to make profit at the expense of the environment and public health

EN_CC_100066.txt

CC: Criticism of climate policies

CC: Criticism of climate policies: Climate policies are only for profit

The text presents multiple paragraphs arguing that climate policies such as the Carbon Management are only favoring oil companies, allowing them to make profit while at the same time not effectively tackle pollution and CO2 emissions

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Oil companies are killing the planet. Now they want to sell us a fake solution? Letters to the Editor: Oil companies are killing the planet. Now they want to sell us a fake solution? To the editor: Let’s recognize “carbon management” for what it is — a fossil fuel industry euphemism for commodifying pollution and providing life support to this dirty industry. While urgent action is needed to address the climate emergency, carbon capture is not a real solution. (“Will storing CO2 in old oil fields slow global warming? First California plan nears approval,” Jan. 14) The process in question requires vast amounts of energy and water. The presence of oil wells and pipelines can result in dangerous and potentially deadly leaks. That’s especially true of improperly plugged wells in the oilfields that companies like California Resources Corp. want to use as carbon dumping grounds. Carbon capture and storage projects divert funds away from what is truly needed: a just transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy such as wind and rooftop solar. Rather than marking “a drastic transformation for fossil fuel companies” and communities, as oil industry supporters claim, carbon management is nothing more than corporate greenwashing intended to keep these polluting companies in business. Victoria Bogdan Tejeda, Oakland The writer is a staff attorney with the Center for Biological Diversity. .. To the editor: Let me see if I understand this correctly. California Resources Corp. wants to utilize its depleted oil fields to store carbon emissions deep underground. This company polluted California for decades, for profit, and now it wants to utilize the same ground that is basically a wasteland of little to no value to store carbon emissions that resulted from the extraction of its product in the first place. The company made unbelievable amounts of money extracting fossil fuels that have resulted in the loss of many lives through their detrimental effects on the environment. Now, it wants to be part of the solution by profiting from the removal of the very same environmental toxins. I think California Resources Corp. could pay for this sequestration itself in an attempt to mitigate the horrid effects it’s had on the human population over the decades. But then again, there would be no profit in that. Jonathon Baker, Riverside .. To the editor: Since humans are emitting 40 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide each year, it would take about 27,000 such places with similar equipment just to keep up with global output. </document> <category> CC: Criticism of climate policies: Climate policies are only for profit </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Article criticising climate policies that seek to reduce carbon emissions since they would create profit only for oil companies who are responsible for emitting carbon emissions in the first place.

EN_CC_100066.txt

CC: Criticism of climate policies

CC: Criticism of climate policies: Climate policies are only for profit

The text presents multiple paragraphs arguing that climate policies such as the Carbon Management are only favoring oil companies, allowing them to make profit while at the same time not effectively tackle pollution and CO2 emissions

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Pence calls viral clip suggesting he cares more about Ukraine than US ‘fake news’ Former Vice President Mike Pence fired back on social media after an out-of-context video clip of him suggesting he’s more interested in the war in Ukraine than issues plaguing cities across the US went viral on Friday. In the video, former Fox News host Tucker Carlson questions the 2024 Republican presidential candidate about where his priorities lie after Pence criticizes the length of time it has taken the Biden administration to provide Ukraine with weapons to fend off Russia’s invasion of the former Soviet state. “You are distressed that the Ukrainians don’t have enough American tanks. Every city in the United States has become much worse over the past three years. Drive around. There’s not one city that’s gotten better in the United States, and it’s visible,” Carlson says during a forum at the Family Leadership Summit in Iowa. “Our economy has degraded, the suicide rate has jumped, public filth and disorder and crime have exponentially increased, and yet, your concern is that the Ukrainians – a country most people can’t find out a map – who’ve received tens of billions of US tax dollars don’t have enough tanks. I think it’s a fair question to ask, like, where’s the concern for the United States in that?” Carlson asks Pence. To which Pence responds, “It’s not my concern. Tucker, I’ve heard that routine from you before, but that’s not my concern.” Several conservatives on social media seized on the clip, including Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk, who shared a snippet of the exchange on Twitter and wrote, “Tucker Carlson just brutalized Mike Pence for prioritizing Ukraine despite a litany of social ills afflicting America.” The former vice president shot back at Kirk on social media, sharing a clip with his full answer to Carlson that showed him explaining that under a Pence administration, the country would be able to tackle both issues affecting Ukraine and domestic problems at the same time. “Sorry [Charlie Kirk]. That is what we used to call FAKE NEWS. Here’s the full clip of my remarks if you’re interested,” Pence wrote in his tweet. In the extended clip, Pence continues his response to Carlson by saying, “Anybody that says that we can’t be the leader of the free world and solve our problems at home has a pretty small view of the greatest nation on Earth. We can do both. “And as president of the United States, we will secure our border, we will support our military, we will revive our economy and stand by our values. And we will also lead the world for freedom under my administration. I promise you.” Pence made an unannounced visit to Kyiv late last month and became the first declared 2024 Republican contender to meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. The 64-year-old made the trip with Samaritan’s Purse, an evangelical Christian humanitarian organization that the former vice president previously accompanied to Poland and Ukraine, a Pence adviser said. “I really do believe that if Vladimir Putin and the Russian military were to overrun Ukraine, it wouldn’t be too long before they cross the border where our men and women would be required to fight,” Pence, an outspoken backer of the Ukrainian war effort and providing US military support for the country, told NBC News in June. </document> <category> URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: The West does not care about Ukraine, only about its interests </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Article quoting Mike Pence and accusing him of not caring about Ukraine but only about his interests. This is used as evidence that the US should not support Ukraine since it would only do it for its interest

EN_UA_017831.txt

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: The West does not care about Ukraine, only about its interests

Throughout several paragraphs, the text conveys a narrative depicting the US public opinion as divided when it comes to discuss military help to Ukraine. In doing so, Mike Pence is criticised for caring more about Ukraine rather than showing concern for the socio-economical problems affecting the US

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Pence calls viral clip suggesting he cares more about Ukraine than US ‘fake news’ Former Vice President Mike Pence fired back on social media after an out-of-context video clip of him suggesting he’s more interested in the war in Ukraine than issues plaguing cities across the US went viral on Friday. In the video, former Fox News host Tucker Carlson questions the 2024 Republican presidential candidate about where his priorities lie after Pence criticizes the length of time it has taken the Biden administration to provide Ukraine with weapons to fend off Russia’s invasion of the former Soviet state. “You are distressed that the Ukrainians don’t have enough American tanks. Every city in the United States has become much worse over the past three years. Drive around. There’s not one city that’s gotten better in the United States, and it’s visible,” Carlson says during a forum at the Family Leadership Summit in Iowa. “Our economy has degraded, the suicide rate has jumped, public filth and disorder and crime have exponentially increased, and yet, your concern is that the Ukrainians – a country most people can’t find out a map – who’ve received tens of billions of US tax dollars don’t have enough tanks. I think it’s a fair question to ask, like, where’s the concern for the United States in that?” Carlson asks Pence. To which Pence responds, “It’s not my concern. Tucker, I’ve heard that routine from you before, but that’s not my concern.” Several conservatives on social media seized on the clip, including Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk, who shared a snippet of the exchange on Twitter and wrote, “Tucker Carlson just brutalized Mike Pence for prioritizing Ukraine despite a litany of social ills afflicting America.” The former vice president shot back at Kirk on social media, sharing a clip with his full answer to Carlson that showed him explaining that under a Pence administration, the country would be able to tackle both issues affecting Ukraine and domestic problems at the same time. “Sorry [Charlie Kirk]. That is what we used to call FAKE NEWS. Here’s the full clip of my remarks if you’re interested,” Pence wrote in his tweet. In the extended clip, Pence continues his response to Carlson by saying, “Anybody that says that we can’t be the leader of the free world and solve our problems at home has a pretty small view of the greatest nation on Earth. We can do both. “And as president of the United States, we will secure our border, we will support our military, we will revive our economy and stand by our values. And we will also lead the world for freedom under my administration. I promise you.” Pence made an unannounced visit to Kyiv late last month and became the first declared 2024 Republican contender to meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. The 64-year-old made the trip with Samaritan’s Purse, an evangelical Christian humanitarian organization that the former vice president previously accompanied to Poland and Ukraine, a Pence adviser said. “I really do believe that if Vladimir Putin and the Russian military were to overrun Ukraine, it wouldn’t be too long before they cross the border where our men and women would be required to fight,” Pence, an outspoken backer of the Ukrainian war effort and providing US military support for the country, told NBC News in June. </document> <category> URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: The West does not care about Ukraine, only about its interests </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Several paragraphs argue that the US public opinion is divided when it comes to support Ukraine. Mike Pence is blamed for allegedly favouring the war in Ukraine more than tackling social issues affecting US cities

EN_UA_017831.txt

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: The West does not care about Ukraine, only about its interests

Throughout several paragraphs, the text conveys a narrative depicting the US public opinion as divided when it comes to discuss military help to Ukraine. In doing so, Mike Pence is criticised for caring more about Ukraine rather than showing concern for the socio-economical problems affecting the US

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Pence calls viral clip suggesting he cares more about Ukraine than US ‘fake news’ Former Vice President Mike Pence fired back on social media after an out-of-context video clip of him suggesting he’s more interested in the war in Ukraine than issues plaguing cities across the US went viral on Friday. In the video, former Fox News host Tucker Carlson questions the 2024 Republican presidential candidate about where his priorities lie after Pence criticizes the length of time it has taken the Biden administration to provide Ukraine with weapons to fend off Russia’s invasion of the former Soviet state. “You are distressed that the Ukrainians don’t have enough American tanks. Every city in the United States has become much worse over the past three years. Drive around. There’s not one city that’s gotten better in the United States, and it’s visible,” Carlson says during a forum at the Family Leadership Summit in Iowa. “Our economy has degraded, the suicide rate has jumped, public filth and disorder and crime have exponentially increased, and yet, your concern is that the Ukrainians – a country most people can’t find out a map – who’ve received tens of billions of US tax dollars don’t have enough tanks. I think it’s a fair question to ask, like, where’s the concern for the United States in that?” Carlson asks Pence. To which Pence responds, “It’s not my concern. Tucker, I’ve heard that routine from you before, but that’s not my concern.” Several conservatives on social media seized on the clip, including Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk, who shared a snippet of the exchange on Twitter and wrote, “Tucker Carlson just brutalized Mike Pence for prioritizing Ukraine despite a litany of social ills afflicting America.” The former vice president shot back at Kirk on social media, sharing a clip with his full answer to Carlson that showed him explaining that under a Pence administration, the country would be able to tackle both issues affecting Ukraine and domestic problems at the same time. “Sorry [Charlie Kirk]. That is what we used to call FAKE NEWS. Here’s the full clip of my remarks if you’re interested,” Pence wrote in his tweet. In the extended clip, Pence continues his response to Carlson by saying, “Anybody that says that we can’t be the leader of the free world and solve our problems at home has a pretty small view of the greatest nation on Earth. We can do both. “And as president of the United States, we will secure our border, we will support our military, we will revive our economy and stand by our values. And we will also lead the world for freedom under my administration. I promise you.” Pence made an unannounced visit to Kyiv late last month and became the first declared 2024 Republican contender to meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. The 64-year-old made the trip with Samaritan’s Purse, an evangelical Christian humanitarian organization that the former vice president previously accompanied to Poland and Ukraine, a Pence adviser said. “I really do believe that if Vladimir Putin and the Russian military were to overrun Ukraine, it wouldn’t be too long before they cross the border where our men and women would be required to fight,” Pence, an outspoken backer of the Ukrainian war effort and providing US military support for the country, told NBC News in June. </document> <category> URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: The West does not care about Ukraine, only about its interests </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text criticises Mike Pence for allegedly not caring about issues affecting the US, accusing him of being more preoccupied with Ukraine

EN_UA_017831.txt

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: The West does not care about Ukraine, only about its interests

Throughout several paragraphs, the text conveys a narrative depicting the US public opinion as divided when it comes to discuss military help to Ukraine. In doing so, Mike Pence is criticised for caring more about Ukraine rather than showing concern for the socio-economical problems affecting the US

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Pence calls viral clip suggesting he cares more about Ukraine than US ‘fake news’ Former Vice President Mike Pence fired back on social media after an out-of-context video clip of him suggesting he’s more interested in the war in Ukraine than issues plaguing cities across the US went viral on Friday. In the video, former Fox News host Tucker Carlson questions the 2024 Republican presidential candidate about where his priorities lie after Pence criticizes the length of time it has taken the Biden administration to provide Ukraine with weapons to fend off Russia’s invasion of the former Soviet state. “You are distressed that the Ukrainians don’t have enough American tanks. Every city in the United States has become much worse over the past three years. Drive around. There’s not one city that’s gotten better in the United States, and it’s visible,” Carlson says during a forum at the Family Leadership Summit in Iowa. “Our economy has degraded, the suicide rate has jumped, public filth and disorder and crime have exponentially increased, and yet, your concern is that the Ukrainians – a country most people can’t find out a map – who’ve received tens of billions of US tax dollars don’t have enough tanks. I think it’s a fair question to ask, like, where’s the concern for the United States in that?” Carlson asks Pence. To which Pence responds, “It’s not my concern. Tucker, I’ve heard that routine from you before, but that’s not my concern.” Several conservatives on social media seized on the clip, including Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk, who shared a snippet of the exchange on Twitter and wrote, “Tucker Carlson just brutalized Mike Pence for prioritizing Ukraine despite a litany of social ills afflicting America.” The former vice president shot back at Kirk on social media, sharing a clip with his full answer to Carlson that showed him explaining that under a Pence administration, the country would be able to tackle both issues affecting Ukraine and domestic problems at the same time. “Sorry [Charlie Kirk]. That is what we used to call FAKE NEWS. Here’s the full clip of my remarks if you’re interested,” Pence wrote in his tweet. In the extended clip, Pence continues his response to Carlson by saying, “Anybody that says that we can’t be the leader of the free world and solve our problems at home has a pretty small view of the greatest nation on Earth. We can do both. “And as president of the United States, we will secure our border, we will support our military, we will revive our economy and stand by our values. And we will also lead the world for freedom under my administration. I promise you.” Pence made an unannounced visit to Kyiv late last month and became the first declared 2024 Republican contender to meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. The 64-year-old made the trip with Samaritan’s Purse, an evangelical Christian humanitarian organization that the former vice president previously accompanied to Poland and Ukraine, a Pence adviser said. “I really do believe that if Vladimir Putin and the Russian military were to overrun Ukraine, it wouldn’t be too long before they cross the border where our men and women would be required to fight,” Pence, an outspoken backer of the Ukrainian war effort and providing US military support for the country, told NBC News in June. </document> <category> URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: The West does not care about Ukraine, only about its interests </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Article suggests Mike Pence cares more about Ukraine than the issues affecting US cities. Author Tucker Carlson is accused of spreading fake news

EN_UA_017831.txt

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: The West does not care about Ukraine, only about its interests

Throughout several paragraphs, the text conveys a narrative depicting the US public opinion as divided when it comes to discuss military help to Ukraine. In doing so, Mike Pence is criticised for caring more about Ukraine rather than showing concern for the socio-economical problems affecting the US

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Pence calls viral clip suggesting he cares more about Ukraine than US ‘fake news’ Former Vice President Mike Pence fired back on social media after an out-of-context video clip of him suggesting he’s more interested in the war in Ukraine than issues plaguing cities across the US went viral on Friday. In the video, former Fox News host Tucker Carlson questions the 2024 Republican presidential candidate about where his priorities lie after Pence criticizes the length of time it has taken the Biden administration to provide Ukraine with weapons to fend off Russia’s invasion of the former Soviet state. “You are distressed that the Ukrainians don’t have enough American tanks. Every city in the United States has become much worse over the past three years. Drive around. There’s not one city that’s gotten better in the United States, and it’s visible,” Carlson says during a forum at the Family Leadership Summit in Iowa. “Our economy has degraded, the suicide rate has jumped, public filth and disorder and crime have exponentially increased, and yet, your concern is that the Ukrainians – a country most people can’t find out a map – who’ve received tens of billions of US tax dollars don’t have enough tanks. I think it’s a fair question to ask, like, where’s the concern for the United States in that?” Carlson asks Pence. To which Pence responds, “It’s not my concern. Tucker, I’ve heard that routine from you before, but that’s not my concern.” Several conservatives on social media seized on the clip, including Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk, who shared a snippet of the exchange on Twitter and wrote, “Tucker Carlson just brutalized Mike Pence for prioritizing Ukraine despite a litany of social ills afflicting America.” The former vice president shot back at Kirk on social media, sharing a clip with his full answer to Carlson that showed him explaining that under a Pence administration, the country would be able to tackle both issues affecting Ukraine and domestic problems at the same time. “Sorry [Charlie Kirk]. That is what we used to call FAKE NEWS. Here’s the full clip of my remarks if you’re interested,” Pence wrote in his tweet. In the extended clip, Pence continues his response to Carlson by saying, “Anybody that says that we can’t be the leader of the free world and solve our problems at home has a pretty small view of the greatest nation on Earth. We can do both. “And as president of the United States, we will secure our border, we will support our military, we will revive our economy and stand by our values. And we will also lead the world for freedom under my administration. I promise you.” Pence made an unannounced visit to Kyiv late last month and became the first declared 2024 Republican contender to meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. The 64-year-old made the trip with Samaritan’s Purse, an evangelical Christian humanitarian organization that the former vice president previously accompanied to Poland and Ukraine, a Pence adviser said. “I really do believe that if Vladimir Putin and the Russian military were to overrun Ukraine, it wouldn’t be too long before they cross the border where our men and women would be required to fight,” Pence, an outspoken backer of the Ukrainian war effort and providing US military support for the country, told NBC News in June. </document> <category> URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: The West does not care about Ukraine, only about its interests </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

In several paragraphs, Mike Pence is criticised for being more concerned about Ukraine rather than solving problems in the US. These problems include an economic decline, lawlessness as well as the rising suicide rate, all of which are blamed on Biden's administration

EN_UA_017831.txt

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: The West does not care about Ukraine, only about its interests

Throughout several paragraphs, the text conveys a narrative depicting the US public opinion as divided when it comes to discuss military help to Ukraine. In doing so, Mike Pence is criticised for caring more about Ukraine rather than showing concern for the socio-economical problems affecting the US

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> How Putin has amassed a staggering SIX THOUSAND nuclear weapons that could reach UK in 20 minutes How Putin has amassed a staggering SIX THOUSAND nuclear weapons that could reach UK in 20 minutes AS sabre rattling goes, it takes some beating. Vladimir Putin’s thinly-veiled threat to nuke the West and insistence that he is "not bluffing" has caused panic across the world. Since the Cold War started, it has been assumed the threat of “mutually assured destruction” — in which tit-for-tat strikes would destroy both parties — would prevent a nuclear war. However, in a chilling threat this week, the unhinged Russian leader declared: "When the territorial integrity of our country is threatened, we will use all the means at our disposal to defend Russia and our people, this is not a bluff." With the dictator’s invasion of Ukraine meeting far stiffer resistance than expected and Western governments uniting against it, such desperate — and terrifying — measures appear more likely. When Putin announced his invasion, he warned the West that it would face “consequences never encountered in your history” if Nato was to interfere militarily. READ MORE IN NEWS So, could the nightmare come true? Putin certainly has the hardware for every scenario. At his disposal are an estimated 5,977 warheads, of which 1,600 are ready to be deployed. This terrifying arsenal can be launched from land, submarines and planes. They include non-strategic “battlefield” nukes which have a smaller destructive power — and radioactive fallout — and are intended to destroy military capabilities rather than civilian populations. They can be anything from land mines to torpedos. They have never been used in combat — so far. Most read in The Sun Russia also has the more feared strategic nuclear weapons, which can be launched as warheads on powerful long-range missiles. They include intercontinental ballistic missiles which would take just 20 minutes to get to Britain — and 30 to the US. These strategic weapons, with deliberately terrifying names such as Satan, are designed to wipe out entire cities. Unleashing such weapons would come with a huge amount of risk for Putin. He knows Nato forces have an equally deadly stockpile, with the US retaining 5,428 warheads alongside the UK’s 225 and France’s 290. But he may not care about retaliation. The Russian leader suggested in 2018 he would be willing to see his homeland destroyed in a nuclear conflict. He said: “If someone decides to annihilate Russia, we have the legal right to respond. Yes, it will be a catastrophe for humanity and for the world. But I’m a citizen of Russia and its head of state. “Why do we need a world without Russia in it?” This, though, was clearly a threat to respond in kind if Russia is ever attacked first. Sam Ashworth-Hayes, of the Henry Jackson Society, told The Sun previously: “I think there is only a risk of escalation if Nato forces did directly become involved in the war in Ukraine. “The message from Vladimir Putin to the West is to stay out of our business, because we will escalate if you interfere.” Nato has made it clear it has no intention of intervening militarily in Ukraine. But one Russian analyst speculated Putin might fire a nuclear warning shot our way. Pavel Felgenhauer, of the independently minded Novaya Gazeta, said: “One option for him is to cut gas supplies to Europe, hoping that will make the Europeans climb down. Another option is to explode a nuclear weapon somewhere over the North Sea between Britain and Denmark — and see what happens.” And US intelligence spies fear Russia might have an “escalate to de-escalate” policy, which means if they should find themselves in conflict with Nato, they would threaten to use low-yield nukes in order to bring a war to an end. 'CONCERNING' Many wonder whether the former KGB spymaster has become unhinged enough to risk escalating a conflict in this way. But one expert believes this could be a ploy. Professor Andrew Wilson, from UCL, said: “Putin is playing a bit on the crazy. The theory goes that if people think I am mad enough to use them then that plays to my advantage.” However, Mr Ashworth-Hayes thinks use of nukes is unlikely. He said: “It is important for people to stay calm. Tensions are very high, but there is no chance of either side launching nuclear weapons. READ MORE SUN STORIES “Both the US and Russia have more than enough warheads to wipe each other out. “The concept of ‘mutually assured destruction’ still stands.” </document> <category> URW: Amplifying war-related fears: There is a real possibility that nuclear weapons will be employed </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The article reports that the use of nuclear weapons by Russia would bring undesirable consequences for the whole world, including the US and the UK. The US and Russia would be damaged significantly

EN_UA_104434.txt

URW: Amplifying war-related fears

URW: Amplifying war-related fears: There is a real possibility that nuclear weapons will be employed

Multiple passages of the text suggest that Russia will use nuclear weapons against NATO countries if there will be an escalation in relation to Ukraine. Vladimir Putin's quote are mentioned to foster this narrative as well as speculations are made about a nuclear attack

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> How Putin has amassed a staggering SIX THOUSAND nuclear weapons that could reach UK in 20 minutes How Putin has amassed a staggering SIX THOUSAND nuclear weapons that could reach UK in 20 minutes AS sabre rattling goes, it takes some beating. Vladimir Putin’s thinly-veiled threat to nuke the West and insistence that he is "not bluffing" has caused panic across the world. Since the Cold War started, it has been assumed the threat of “mutually assured destruction” — in which tit-for-tat strikes would destroy both parties — would prevent a nuclear war. However, in a chilling threat this week, the unhinged Russian leader declared: "When the territorial integrity of our country is threatened, we will use all the means at our disposal to defend Russia and our people, this is not a bluff." With the dictator’s invasion of Ukraine meeting far stiffer resistance than expected and Western governments uniting against it, such desperate — and terrifying — measures appear more likely. When Putin announced his invasion, he warned the West that it would face “consequences never encountered in your history” if Nato was to interfere militarily. READ MORE IN NEWS So, could the nightmare come true? Putin certainly has the hardware for every scenario. At his disposal are an estimated 5,977 warheads, of which 1,600 are ready to be deployed. This terrifying arsenal can be launched from land, submarines and planes. They include non-strategic “battlefield” nukes which have a smaller destructive power — and radioactive fallout — and are intended to destroy military capabilities rather than civilian populations. They can be anything from land mines to torpedos. They have never been used in combat — so far. Most read in The Sun Russia also has the more feared strategic nuclear weapons, which can be launched as warheads on powerful long-range missiles. They include intercontinental ballistic missiles which would take just 20 minutes to get to Britain — and 30 to the US. These strategic weapons, with deliberately terrifying names such as Satan, are designed to wipe out entire cities. Unleashing such weapons would come with a huge amount of risk for Putin. He knows Nato forces have an equally deadly stockpile, with the US retaining 5,428 warheads alongside the UK’s 225 and France’s 290. But he may not care about retaliation. The Russian leader suggested in 2018 he would be willing to see his homeland destroyed in a nuclear conflict. He said: “If someone decides to annihilate Russia, we have the legal right to respond. Yes, it will be a catastrophe for humanity and for the world. But I’m a citizen of Russia and its head of state. “Why do we need a world without Russia in it?” This, though, was clearly a threat to respond in kind if Russia is ever attacked first. Sam Ashworth-Hayes, of the Henry Jackson Society, told The Sun previously: “I think there is only a risk of escalation if Nato forces did directly become involved in the war in Ukraine. “The message from Vladimir Putin to the West is to stay out of our business, because we will escalate if you interfere.” Nato has made it clear it has no intention of intervening militarily in Ukraine. But one Russian analyst speculated Putin might fire a nuclear warning shot our way. Pavel Felgenhauer, of the independently minded Novaya Gazeta, said: “One option for him is to cut gas supplies to Europe, hoping that will make the Europeans climb down. Another option is to explode a nuclear weapon somewhere over the North Sea between Britain and Denmark — and see what happens.” And US intelligence spies fear Russia might have an “escalate to de-escalate” policy, which means if they should find themselves in conflict with Nato, they would threaten to use low-yield nukes in order to bring a war to an end. 'CONCERNING' Many wonder whether the former KGB spymaster has become unhinged enough to risk escalating a conflict in this way. But one expert believes this could be a ploy. Professor Andrew Wilson, from UCL, said: “Putin is playing a bit on the crazy. The theory goes that if people think I am mad enough to use them then that plays to my advantage.” However, Mr Ashworth-Hayes thinks use of nukes is unlikely. He said: “It is important for people to stay calm. Tensions are very high, but there is no chance of either side launching nuclear weapons. READ MORE SUN STORIES “Both the US and Russia have more than enough warheads to wipe each other out. “The concept of ‘mutually assured destruction’ still stands.” </document> <category> URW: Amplifying war-related fears: There is a real possibility that nuclear weapons will be employed </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Multiple paragraphs present passages in which the possibility of the use of atomic weapons is described as possible or even imminent. Russia is depicted as the aggressor, however Western countries are also portrayed as posing a threat, mentioning in particular the case of the UK

EN_UA_104434.txt

URW: Amplifying war-related fears

URW: Amplifying war-related fears: There is a real possibility that nuclear weapons will be employed

Multiple passages of the text suggest that Russia will use nuclear weapons against NATO countries if there will be an escalation in relation to Ukraine. Vladimir Putin's quote are mentioned to foster this narrative as well as speculations are made about a nuclear attack

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> How Putin has amassed a staggering SIX THOUSAND nuclear weapons that could reach UK in 20 minutes How Putin has amassed a staggering SIX THOUSAND nuclear weapons that could reach UK in 20 minutes AS sabre rattling goes, it takes some beating. Vladimir Putin’s thinly-veiled threat to nuke the West and insistence that he is "not bluffing" has caused panic across the world. Since the Cold War started, it has been assumed the threat of “mutually assured destruction” — in which tit-for-tat strikes would destroy both parties — would prevent a nuclear war. However, in a chilling threat this week, the unhinged Russian leader declared: "When the territorial integrity of our country is threatened, we will use all the means at our disposal to defend Russia and our people, this is not a bluff." With the dictator’s invasion of Ukraine meeting far stiffer resistance than expected and Western governments uniting against it, such desperate — and terrifying — measures appear more likely. When Putin announced his invasion, he warned the West that it would face “consequences never encountered in your history” if Nato was to interfere militarily. READ MORE IN NEWS So, could the nightmare come true? Putin certainly has the hardware for every scenario. At his disposal are an estimated 5,977 warheads, of which 1,600 are ready to be deployed. This terrifying arsenal can be launched from land, submarines and planes. They include non-strategic “battlefield” nukes which have a smaller destructive power — and radioactive fallout — and are intended to destroy military capabilities rather than civilian populations. They can be anything from land mines to torpedos. They have never been used in combat — so far. Most read in The Sun Russia also has the more feared strategic nuclear weapons, which can be launched as warheads on powerful long-range missiles. They include intercontinental ballistic missiles which would take just 20 minutes to get to Britain — and 30 to the US. These strategic weapons, with deliberately terrifying names such as Satan, are designed to wipe out entire cities. Unleashing such weapons would come with a huge amount of risk for Putin. He knows Nato forces have an equally deadly stockpile, with the US retaining 5,428 warheads alongside the UK’s 225 and France’s 290. But he may not care about retaliation. The Russian leader suggested in 2018 he would be willing to see his homeland destroyed in a nuclear conflict. He said: “If someone decides to annihilate Russia, we have the legal right to respond. Yes, it will be a catastrophe for humanity and for the world. But I’m a citizen of Russia and its head of state. “Why do we need a world without Russia in it?” This, though, was clearly a threat to respond in kind if Russia is ever attacked first. Sam Ashworth-Hayes, of the Henry Jackson Society, told The Sun previously: “I think there is only a risk of escalation if Nato forces did directly become involved in the war in Ukraine. “The message from Vladimir Putin to the West is to stay out of our business, because we will escalate if you interfere.” Nato has made it clear it has no intention of intervening militarily in Ukraine. But one Russian analyst speculated Putin might fire a nuclear warning shot our way. Pavel Felgenhauer, of the independently minded Novaya Gazeta, said: “One option for him is to cut gas supplies to Europe, hoping that will make the Europeans climb down. Another option is to explode a nuclear weapon somewhere over the North Sea between Britain and Denmark — and see what happens.” And US intelligence spies fear Russia might have an “escalate to de-escalate” policy, which means if they should find themselves in conflict with Nato, they would threaten to use low-yield nukes in order to bring a war to an end. 'CONCERNING' Many wonder whether the former KGB spymaster has become unhinged enough to risk escalating a conflict in this way. But one expert believes this could be a ploy. Professor Andrew Wilson, from UCL, said: “Putin is playing a bit on the crazy. The theory goes that if people think I am mad enough to use them then that plays to my advantage.” However, Mr Ashworth-Hayes thinks use of nukes is unlikely. He said: “It is important for people to stay calm. Tensions are very high, but there is no chance of either side launching nuclear weapons. READ MORE SUN STORIES “Both the US and Russia have more than enough warheads to wipe each other out. “The concept of ‘mutually assured destruction’ still stands.” </document> <category> URW: Amplifying war-related fears: There is a real possibility that nuclear weapons will be employed </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Article reporting multiple paragraphs that together contribute to fear mongering. Putin is described as "unhinged", "mad" and risking escalation. Several paragraphs also report statements of people close to Putin indicating he is willing to escalate conflict.

EN_UA_104434.txt

URW: Amplifying war-related fears

URW: Amplifying war-related fears: There is a real possibility that nuclear weapons will be employed

Multiple passages of the text suggest that Russia will use nuclear weapons against NATO countries if there will be an escalation in relation to Ukraine. Vladimir Putin's quote are mentioned to foster this narrative as well as speculations are made about a nuclear attack

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> How Putin has amassed a staggering SIX THOUSAND nuclear weapons that could reach UK in 20 minutes How Putin has amassed a staggering SIX THOUSAND nuclear weapons that could reach UK in 20 minutes AS sabre rattling goes, it takes some beating. Vladimir Putin’s thinly-veiled threat to nuke the West and insistence that he is "not bluffing" has caused panic across the world. Since the Cold War started, it has been assumed the threat of “mutually assured destruction” — in which tit-for-tat strikes would destroy both parties — would prevent a nuclear war. However, in a chilling threat this week, the unhinged Russian leader declared: "When the territorial integrity of our country is threatened, we will use all the means at our disposal to defend Russia and our people, this is not a bluff." With the dictator’s invasion of Ukraine meeting far stiffer resistance than expected and Western governments uniting against it, such desperate — and terrifying — measures appear more likely. When Putin announced his invasion, he warned the West that it would face “consequences never encountered in your history” if Nato was to interfere militarily. READ MORE IN NEWS So, could the nightmare come true? Putin certainly has the hardware for every scenario. At his disposal are an estimated 5,977 warheads, of which 1,600 are ready to be deployed. This terrifying arsenal can be launched from land, submarines and planes. They include non-strategic “battlefield” nukes which have a smaller destructive power — and radioactive fallout — and are intended to destroy military capabilities rather than civilian populations. They can be anything from land mines to torpedos. They have never been used in combat — so far. Most read in The Sun Russia also has the more feared strategic nuclear weapons, which can be launched as warheads on powerful long-range missiles. They include intercontinental ballistic missiles which would take just 20 minutes to get to Britain — and 30 to the US. These strategic weapons, with deliberately terrifying names such as Satan, are designed to wipe out entire cities. Unleashing such weapons would come with a huge amount of risk for Putin. He knows Nato forces have an equally deadly stockpile, with the US retaining 5,428 warheads alongside the UK’s 225 and France’s 290. But he may not care about retaliation. The Russian leader suggested in 2018 he would be willing to see his homeland destroyed in a nuclear conflict. He said: “If someone decides to annihilate Russia, we have the legal right to respond. Yes, it will be a catastrophe for humanity and for the world. But I’m a citizen of Russia and its head of state. “Why do we need a world without Russia in it?” This, though, was clearly a threat to respond in kind if Russia is ever attacked first. Sam Ashworth-Hayes, of the Henry Jackson Society, told The Sun previously: “I think there is only a risk of escalation if Nato forces did directly become involved in the war in Ukraine. “The message from Vladimir Putin to the West is to stay out of our business, because we will escalate if you interfere.” Nato has made it clear it has no intention of intervening militarily in Ukraine. But one Russian analyst speculated Putin might fire a nuclear warning shot our way. Pavel Felgenhauer, of the independently minded Novaya Gazeta, said: “One option for him is to cut gas supplies to Europe, hoping that will make the Europeans climb down. Another option is to explode a nuclear weapon somewhere over the North Sea between Britain and Denmark — and see what happens.” And US intelligence spies fear Russia might have an “escalate to de-escalate” policy, which means if they should find themselves in conflict with Nato, they would threaten to use low-yield nukes in order to bring a war to an end. 'CONCERNING' Many wonder whether the former KGB spymaster has become unhinged enough to risk escalating a conflict in this way. But one expert believes this could be a ploy. Professor Andrew Wilson, from UCL, said: “Putin is playing a bit on the crazy. The theory goes that if people think I am mad enough to use them then that plays to my advantage.” However, Mr Ashworth-Hayes thinks use of nukes is unlikely. He said: “It is important for people to stay calm. Tensions are very high, but there is no chance of either side launching nuclear weapons. READ MORE SUN STORIES “Both the US and Russia have more than enough warheads to wipe each other out. “The concept of ‘mutually assured destruction’ still stands.” </document> <category> URW: Amplifying war-related fears: There is a real possibility that nuclear weapons will be employed </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Article suggest that Putin might use nukes on Western allies, particularly UK. Amplifies fears of using unconventional weapons and also quotes experts suggesting that it is unlikely.

EN_UA_104434.txt

URW: Amplifying war-related fears

URW: Amplifying war-related fears: There is a real possibility that nuclear weapons will be employed

Multiple passages of the text suggest that Russia will use nuclear weapons against NATO countries if there will be an escalation in relation to Ukraine. Vladimir Putin's quote are mentioned to foster this narrative as well as speculations are made about a nuclear attack

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> How Putin has amassed a staggering SIX THOUSAND nuclear weapons that could reach UK in 20 minutes How Putin has amassed a staggering SIX THOUSAND nuclear weapons that could reach UK in 20 minutes AS sabre rattling goes, it takes some beating. Vladimir Putin’s thinly-veiled threat to nuke the West and insistence that he is "not bluffing" has caused panic across the world. Since the Cold War started, it has been assumed the threat of “mutually assured destruction” — in which tit-for-tat strikes would destroy both parties — would prevent a nuclear war. However, in a chilling threat this week, the unhinged Russian leader declared: "When the territorial integrity of our country is threatened, we will use all the means at our disposal to defend Russia and our people, this is not a bluff." With the dictator’s invasion of Ukraine meeting far stiffer resistance than expected and Western governments uniting against it, such desperate — and terrifying — measures appear more likely. When Putin announced his invasion, he warned the West that it would face “consequences never encountered in your history” if Nato was to interfere militarily. READ MORE IN NEWS So, could the nightmare come true? Putin certainly has the hardware for every scenario. At his disposal are an estimated 5,977 warheads, of which 1,600 are ready to be deployed. This terrifying arsenal can be launched from land, submarines and planes. They include non-strategic “battlefield” nukes which have a smaller destructive power — and radioactive fallout — and are intended to destroy military capabilities rather than civilian populations. They can be anything from land mines to torpedos. They have never been used in combat — so far. Most read in The Sun Russia also has the more feared strategic nuclear weapons, which can be launched as warheads on powerful long-range missiles. They include intercontinental ballistic missiles which would take just 20 minutes to get to Britain — and 30 to the US. These strategic weapons, with deliberately terrifying names such as Satan, are designed to wipe out entire cities. Unleashing such weapons would come with a huge amount of risk for Putin. He knows Nato forces have an equally deadly stockpile, with the US retaining 5,428 warheads alongside the UK’s 225 and France’s 290. But he may not care about retaliation. The Russian leader suggested in 2018 he would be willing to see his homeland destroyed in a nuclear conflict. He said: “If someone decides to annihilate Russia, we have the legal right to respond. Yes, it will be a catastrophe for humanity and for the world. But I’m a citizen of Russia and its head of state. “Why do we need a world without Russia in it?” This, though, was clearly a threat to respond in kind if Russia is ever attacked first. Sam Ashworth-Hayes, of the Henry Jackson Society, told The Sun previously: “I think there is only a risk of escalation if Nato forces did directly become involved in the war in Ukraine. “The message from Vladimir Putin to the West is to stay out of our business, because we will escalate if you interfere.” Nato has made it clear it has no intention of intervening militarily in Ukraine. But one Russian analyst speculated Putin might fire a nuclear warning shot our way. Pavel Felgenhauer, of the independently minded Novaya Gazeta, said: “One option for him is to cut gas supplies to Europe, hoping that will make the Europeans climb down. Another option is to explode a nuclear weapon somewhere over the North Sea between Britain and Denmark — and see what happens.” And US intelligence spies fear Russia might have an “escalate to de-escalate” policy, which means if they should find themselves in conflict with Nato, they would threaten to use low-yield nukes in order to bring a war to an end. 'CONCERNING' Many wonder whether the former KGB spymaster has become unhinged enough to risk escalating a conflict in this way. But one expert believes this could be a ploy. Professor Andrew Wilson, from UCL, said: “Putin is playing a bit on the crazy. The theory goes that if people think I am mad enough to use them then that plays to my advantage.” However, Mr Ashworth-Hayes thinks use of nukes is unlikely. He said: “It is important for people to stay calm. Tensions are very high, but there is no chance of either side launching nuclear weapons. READ MORE SUN STORIES “Both the US and Russia have more than enough warheads to wipe each other out. “The concept of ‘mutually assured destruction’ still stands.” </document> <category> URW: Amplifying war-related fears: There is a real possibility that nuclear weapons will be employed </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text presents a narrative reporting on possible scenarios in which nuclear weapons would be employed by Russia within the context of the war in Ukraine, suggesting that such a scenario is likely

EN_UA_104434.txt

URW: Amplifying war-related fears

URW: Amplifying war-related fears: There is a real possibility that nuclear weapons will be employed

Multiple passages of the text suggest that Russia will use nuclear weapons against NATO countries if there will be an escalation in relation to Ukraine. Vladimir Putin's quote are mentioned to foster this narrative as well as speculations are made about a nuclear attack

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> The Ukraine War, How the British Derailed Peace The Ukraine War, How the British Derailed Peace BATTLEFORWORLD.COM | November 25, 2023: Ex-Pentagon analyst revealed that the West refused to support the Ukraine-Russia peace talks and is now seeking a way out. The leader of the Servant of the People faction in the Ukrainian parliament, Davyd Arakhamia, disclosed that the March 2022 Russian-Ukrainian peace talks was a no go because then UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson brought the negotiations to zero, to have Ukraine continue the conflict. And to pressure the Kiev regime, that was when the “Bucha massacre” appeared at the appropriate time to derailed the peace talks that was ongoing in Turkey. The Bucha massacre was later debunked by Russia as a hoax, but the damage was already done to smear Russia on the world stage, to which the UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson continued along pushing the war stroking the conflict as various countries kept on supplying all sorts of weapons. According to Arakhamia, the Russians were willing to end the conflict if Ukraine was to agree to neutrality and provide guarantees to not join NATO. Arakhamia referenced an interview he gave to Ukrainian TV channel 1+1, saying: “When we returned from Istanbul, Boris Johnson came to Kiev and said: ‘We won’t sign anything with them at all, and let’s just fight’.” Continue at BATTLEFORWORLD.COM (In the Silent Revolution Of Truth, Compilation Edition, Volume 4, the free PDF book: Download and read: Zelensky Secretly Becomes an Oligarch, page 110. Zelensky Perpetuates the War and Murders in Ukraine, page 119. Zelensky is Running a NAZI-Style NAZI Regency in Kiev, page 147. Zelensky Inciting Enemies of the Jews Against the Jews, page 164. Neo-Nazis in Germany to Supply Zelensky with Weapons Against Russia, page 268. When Those Of The Northern Pole Are United Together, page 10. Note: Use the page number display located at top right to find the correct page. Free Book, PDF Format – Links: Book Summary | and Download Volume 4 Book) (In the Silent Revolution Of Truth, Compilation Edition, Volume 7, the free PDF book: Download and read: The Creation-Energy Teaching, repetition is necessary, for the basic Creation-Energy knowledge and understanding to breakthrough, page I-1. See what happens during the death of the body, our rest and rebirth (Note: first time presented in history), page 61. The Twelve Recommendations/Commandments, page 140. A Prayer Written by Jmmanuel / Immanuel / Emmanuel (- the ORIGINAL PARYER), pages 16 – 17. The Human with a Part-Piece of the Creation-Energy, page 89. Note: Use the page number display located at top right to find the correct page. Free Book, PDF Format – Links: Book Summary | and Download Volume 7 Book) Boris Johnson and Zelensky. END Anyone can join. Anyone can contribute. Anyone can become informed about their world. "United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends. Humic & Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex HerbAnomic’s Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex is a revolutionary new Humic and Fulvic Acid Complex designed to support your body at the cellular level. Our product has been thoroughly tested by an ISO/IEC Certified Lab for toxins and Heavy metals as well as for trace mineral content. We KNOW we have NO lead, arsenic, mercury, aluminum etc. in our Formula. This Humic & Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral complex has high trace levels of naturally occurring Humic and Fulvic Acids as well as high trace levels of Zinc, Iron, Magnesium, Molybdenum, Potassium and more. There is a wide range of up to 70 trace minerals which occur naturally in our Complex at varying levels. We Choose to list the 8 substances which occur in higher trace levels on our supplement panel. We don’t claim a high number of minerals as other Humic and Fulvic Supplements do and leave you to guess which elements you’ll be getting. Order Your Humic Fulvic for Your Family by Clicking on this Link, or the Banner Below. Our Formula is an exceptional value compared to other Humic Fulvic Minerals because... It’s OXYGENATED It Always Tests at 9.5+ pH Preservative and Chemical Free Allergen Free Comes From a Pure, Unpolluted, Organic Source Is an Excellent Source for Trace Minerals Is From Whole, Prehisoric Plant Based Origin Material With Ionic Minerals and Constituents Highly Conductive/Full of Extra Electrons Is a Full Spectrum Complex Our Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex has Minerals, Amino Acids, Poly Electrolytes, Phytochemicals, Polyphenols, Bioflavonoids and Trace Vitamins included with the Humic and Fulvic Acid. Our Source material is high in these constituents, where other manufacturers use inferior materials. Try Our Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex today. Be 100% Satisfied or Receive a Full Money Back Guarantee. Order Yours Today by Following This Link. </document> <category> URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: Diplomacy does/will not work </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Several paragraphs depict the failure of the Ukraine-Russia talks in 2022 as the consequence of British interference. Ukraine is ultimately described as the aggressor, highlighting the conflict is purely motivated by NATO

EN_UA_102415.txt

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: Diplomacy does/will not work

The text has several paragraphs arguing that diplomatic efforts are undermined by Western countries such as the UK, which obstructed peace talks between Russian and Ukraine in order to continue the conflict

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> The Ukraine War, How the British Derailed Peace The Ukraine War, How the British Derailed Peace BATTLEFORWORLD.COM | November 25, 2023: Ex-Pentagon analyst revealed that the West refused to support the Ukraine-Russia peace talks and is now seeking a way out. The leader of the Servant of the People faction in the Ukrainian parliament, Davyd Arakhamia, disclosed that the March 2022 Russian-Ukrainian peace talks was a no go because then UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson brought the negotiations to zero, to have Ukraine continue the conflict. And to pressure the Kiev regime, that was when the “Bucha massacre” appeared at the appropriate time to derailed the peace talks that was ongoing in Turkey. The Bucha massacre was later debunked by Russia as a hoax, but the damage was already done to smear Russia on the world stage, to which the UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson continued along pushing the war stroking the conflict as various countries kept on supplying all sorts of weapons. According to Arakhamia, the Russians were willing to end the conflict if Ukraine was to agree to neutrality and provide guarantees to not join NATO. Arakhamia referenced an interview he gave to Ukrainian TV channel 1+1, saying: “When we returned from Istanbul, Boris Johnson came to Kiev and said: ‘We won’t sign anything with them at all, and let’s just fight’.” Continue at BATTLEFORWORLD.COM (In the Silent Revolution Of Truth, Compilation Edition, Volume 4, the free PDF book: Download and read: Zelensky Secretly Becomes an Oligarch, page 110. Zelensky Perpetuates the War and Murders in Ukraine, page 119. Zelensky is Running a NAZI-Style NAZI Regency in Kiev, page 147. Zelensky Inciting Enemies of the Jews Against the Jews, page 164. Neo-Nazis in Germany to Supply Zelensky with Weapons Against Russia, page 268. When Those Of The Northern Pole Are United Together, page 10. Note: Use the page number display located at top right to find the correct page. Free Book, PDF Format – Links: Book Summary | and Download Volume 4 Book) (In the Silent Revolution Of Truth, Compilation Edition, Volume 7, the free PDF book: Download and read: The Creation-Energy Teaching, repetition is necessary, for the basic Creation-Energy knowledge and understanding to breakthrough, page I-1. See what happens during the death of the body, our rest and rebirth (Note: first time presented in history), page 61. The Twelve Recommendations/Commandments, page 140. A Prayer Written by Jmmanuel / Immanuel / Emmanuel (- the ORIGINAL PARYER), pages 16 – 17. The Human with a Part-Piece of the Creation-Energy, page 89. Note: Use the page number display located at top right to find the correct page. Free Book, PDF Format – Links: Book Summary | and Download Volume 7 Book) Boris Johnson and Zelensky. END Anyone can join. Anyone can contribute. Anyone can become informed about their world. "United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends. Humic & Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex HerbAnomic’s Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex is a revolutionary new Humic and Fulvic Acid Complex designed to support your body at the cellular level. Our product has been thoroughly tested by an ISO/IEC Certified Lab for toxins and Heavy metals as well as for trace mineral content. We KNOW we have NO lead, arsenic, mercury, aluminum etc. in our Formula. This Humic & Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral complex has high trace levels of naturally occurring Humic and Fulvic Acids as well as high trace levels of Zinc, Iron, Magnesium, Molybdenum, Potassium and more. There is a wide range of up to 70 trace minerals which occur naturally in our Complex at varying levels. We Choose to list the 8 substances which occur in higher trace levels on our supplement panel. We don’t claim a high number of minerals as other Humic and Fulvic Supplements do and leave you to guess which elements you’ll be getting. Order Your Humic Fulvic for Your Family by Clicking on this Link, or the Banner Below. Our Formula is an exceptional value compared to other Humic Fulvic Minerals because... It’s OXYGENATED It Always Tests at 9.5+ pH Preservative and Chemical Free Allergen Free Comes From a Pure, Unpolluted, Organic Source Is an Excellent Source for Trace Minerals Is From Whole, Prehisoric Plant Based Origin Material With Ionic Minerals and Constituents Highly Conductive/Full of Extra Electrons Is a Full Spectrum Complex Our Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex has Minerals, Amino Acids, Poly Electrolytes, Phytochemicals, Polyphenols, Bioflavonoids and Trace Vitamins included with the Humic and Fulvic Acid. Our Source material is high in these constituents, where other manufacturers use inferior materials. Try Our Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex today. Be 100% Satisfied or Receive a Full Money Back Guarantee. Order Yours Today by Following This Link. </document> <category> URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: Diplomacy does/will not work </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text presents several paragraphs depicting Western countries as trying to undermine negotiations between Russia and Ukraine, especially quoting former Ukrainian officials and the Bucha massacre

EN_UA_102415.txt

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: Diplomacy does/will not work

The text has several paragraphs arguing that diplomatic efforts are undermined by Western countries such as the UK, which obstructed peace talks between Russian and Ukraine in order to continue the conflict

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> The Ukraine War, How the British Derailed Peace The Ukraine War, How the British Derailed Peace BATTLEFORWORLD.COM | November 25, 2023: Ex-Pentagon analyst revealed that the West refused to support the Ukraine-Russia peace talks and is now seeking a way out. The leader of the Servant of the People faction in the Ukrainian parliament, Davyd Arakhamia, disclosed that the March 2022 Russian-Ukrainian peace talks was a no go because then UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson brought the negotiations to zero, to have Ukraine continue the conflict. And to pressure the Kiev regime, that was when the “Bucha massacre” appeared at the appropriate time to derailed the peace talks that was ongoing in Turkey. The Bucha massacre was later debunked by Russia as a hoax, but the damage was already done to smear Russia on the world stage, to which the UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson continued along pushing the war stroking the conflict as various countries kept on supplying all sorts of weapons. According to Arakhamia, the Russians were willing to end the conflict if Ukraine was to agree to neutrality and provide guarantees to not join NATO. Arakhamia referenced an interview he gave to Ukrainian TV channel 1+1, saying: “When we returned from Istanbul, Boris Johnson came to Kiev and said: ‘We won’t sign anything with them at all, and let’s just fight’.” Continue at BATTLEFORWORLD.COM (In the Silent Revolution Of Truth, Compilation Edition, Volume 4, the free PDF book: Download and read: Zelensky Secretly Becomes an Oligarch, page 110. Zelensky Perpetuates the War and Murders in Ukraine, page 119. Zelensky is Running a NAZI-Style NAZI Regency in Kiev, page 147. Zelensky Inciting Enemies of the Jews Against the Jews, page 164. Neo-Nazis in Germany to Supply Zelensky with Weapons Against Russia, page 268. When Those Of The Northern Pole Are United Together, page 10. Note: Use the page number display located at top right to find the correct page. Free Book, PDF Format – Links: Book Summary | and Download Volume 4 Book) (In the Silent Revolution Of Truth, Compilation Edition, Volume 7, the free PDF book: Download and read: The Creation-Energy Teaching, repetition is necessary, for the basic Creation-Energy knowledge and understanding to breakthrough, page I-1. See what happens during the death of the body, our rest and rebirth (Note: first time presented in history), page 61. The Twelve Recommendations/Commandments, page 140. A Prayer Written by Jmmanuel / Immanuel / Emmanuel (- the ORIGINAL PARYER), pages 16 – 17. The Human with a Part-Piece of the Creation-Energy, page 89. Note: Use the page number display located at top right to find the correct page. Free Book, PDF Format – Links: Book Summary | and Download Volume 7 Book) Boris Johnson and Zelensky. END Anyone can join. Anyone can contribute. Anyone can become informed about their world. "United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends. Humic & Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex HerbAnomic’s Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex is a revolutionary new Humic and Fulvic Acid Complex designed to support your body at the cellular level. Our product has been thoroughly tested by an ISO/IEC Certified Lab for toxins and Heavy metals as well as for trace mineral content. We KNOW we have NO lead, arsenic, mercury, aluminum etc. in our Formula. This Humic & Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral complex has high trace levels of naturally occurring Humic and Fulvic Acids as well as high trace levels of Zinc, Iron, Magnesium, Molybdenum, Potassium and more. There is a wide range of up to 70 trace minerals which occur naturally in our Complex at varying levels. We Choose to list the 8 substances which occur in higher trace levels on our supplement panel. We don’t claim a high number of minerals as other Humic and Fulvic Supplements do and leave you to guess which elements you’ll be getting. Order Your Humic Fulvic for Your Family by Clicking on this Link, or the Banner Below. Our Formula is an exceptional value compared to other Humic Fulvic Minerals because... It’s OXYGENATED It Always Tests at 9.5+ pH Preservative and Chemical Free Allergen Free Comes From a Pure, Unpolluted, Organic Source Is an Excellent Source for Trace Minerals Is From Whole, Prehisoric Plant Based Origin Material With Ionic Minerals and Constituents Highly Conductive/Full of Extra Electrons Is a Full Spectrum Complex Our Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex has Minerals, Amino Acids, Poly Electrolytes, Phytochemicals, Polyphenols, Bioflavonoids and Trace Vitamins included with the Humic and Fulvic Acid. Our Source material is high in these constituents, where other manufacturers use inferior materials. Try Our Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex today. Be 100% Satisfied or Receive a Full Money Back Guarantee. Order Yours Today by Following This Link. </document> <category> URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: Diplomacy does/will not work </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Throughout the text, there are multiple passages highlighting that UK has sabotaged peace negotiations between Russia and Ukraine. This narrative is achieved by accusing the UK of not having the interests of Ukraine at heart

EN_UA_102415.txt

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: Diplomacy does/will not work

The text has several paragraphs arguing that diplomatic efforts are undermined by Western countries such as the UK, which obstructed peace talks between Russian and Ukraine in order to continue the conflict

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> The Ukraine War, How the British Derailed Peace The Ukraine War, How the British Derailed Peace BATTLEFORWORLD.COM | November 25, 2023: Ex-Pentagon analyst revealed that the West refused to support the Ukraine-Russia peace talks and is now seeking a way out. The leader of the Servant of the People faction in the Ukrainian parliament, Davyd Arakhamia, disclosed that the March 2022 Russian-Ukrainian peace talks was a no go because then UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson brought the negotiations to zero, to have Ukraine continue the conflict. And to pressure the Kiev regime, that was when the “Bucha massacre” appeared at the appropriate time to derailed the peace talks that was ongoing in Turkey. The Bucha massacre was later debunked by Russia as a hoax, but the damage was already done to smear Russia on the world stage, to which the UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson continued along pushing the war stroking the conflict as various countries kept on supplying all sorts of weapons. According to Arakhamia, the Russians were willing to end the conflict if Ukraine was to agree to neutrality and provide guarantees to not join NATO. Arakhamia referenced an interview he gave to Ukrainian TV channel 1+1, saying: “When we returned from Istanbul, Boris Johnson came to Kiev and said: ‘We won’t sign anything with them at all, and let’s just fight’.” Continue at BATTLEFORWORLD.COM (In the Silent Revolution Of Truth, Compilation Edition, Volume 4, the free PDF book: Download and read: Zelensky Secretly Becomes an Oligarch, page 110. Zelensky Perpetuates the War and Murders in Ukraine, page 119. Zelensky is Running a NAZI-Style NAZI Regency in Kiev, page 147. Zelensky Inciting Enemies of the Jews Against the Jews, page 164. Neo-Nazis in Germany to Supply Zelensky with Weapons Against Russia, page 268. When Those Of The Northern Pole Are United Together, page 10. Note: Use the page number display located at top right to find the correct page. Free Book, PDF Format – Links: Book Summary | and Download Volume 4 Book) (In the Silent Revolution Of Truth, Compilation Edition, Volume 7, the free PDF book: Download and read: The Creation-Energy Teaching, repetition is necessary, for the basic Creation-Energy knowledge and understanding to breakthrough, page I-1. See what happens during the death of the body, our rest and rebirth (Note: first time presented in history), page 61. The Twelve Recommendations/Commandments, page 140. A Prayer Written by Jmmanuel / Immanuel / Emmanuel (- the ORIGINAL PARYER), pages 16 – 17. The Human with a Part-Piece of the Creation-Energy, page 89. Note: Use the page number display located at top right to find the correct page. Free Book, PDF Format – Links: Book Summary | and Download Volume 7 Book) Boris Johnson and Zelensky. END Anyone can join. Anyone can contribute. Anyone can become informed about their world. "United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends. Humic & Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex HerbAnomic’s Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex is a revolutionary new Humic and Fulvic Acid Complex designed to support your body at the cellular level. Our product has been thoroughly tested by an ISO/IEC Certified Lab for toxins and Heavy metals as well as for trace mineral content. We KNOW we have NO lead, arsenic, mercury, aluminum etc. in our Formula. This Humic & Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral complex has high trace levels of naturally occurring Humic and Fulvic Acids as well as high trace levels of Zinc, Iron, Magnesium, Molybdenum, Potassium and more. There is a wide range of up to 70 trace minerals which occur naturally in our Complex at varying levels. We Choose to list the 8 substances which occur in higher trace levels on our supplement panel. We don’t claim a high number of minerals as other Humic and Fulvic Supplements do and leave you to guess which elements you’ll be getting. Order Your Humic Fulvic for Your Family by Clicking on this Link, or the Banner Below. Our Formula is an exceptional value compared to other Humic Fulvic Minerals because... It’s OXYGENATED It Always Tests at 9.5+ pH Preservative and Chemical Free Allergen Free Comes From a Pure, Unpolluted, Organic Source Is an Excellent Source for Trace Minerals Is From Whole, Prehisoric Plant Based Origin Material With Ionic Minerals and Constituents Highly Conductive/Full of Extra Electrons Is a Full Spectrum Complex Our Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex has Minerals, Amino Acids, Poly Electrolytes, Phytochemicals, Polyphenols, Bioflavonoids and Trace Vitamins included with the Humic and Fulvic Acid. Our Source material is high in these constituents, where other manufacturers use inferior materials. Try Our Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex today. Be 100% Satisfied or Receive a Full Money Back Guarantee. Order Yours Today by Following This Link. </document> <category> URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: Diplomacy does/will not work </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The article is describing a negotiation process that occured between Russia and Ukraine in order to end the War in Ukraine, but the UK has sabotaged it

EN_UA_102415.txt

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: Diplomacy does/will not work

The text has several paragraphs arguing that diplomatic efforts are undermined by Western countries such as the UK, which obstructed peace talks between Russian and Ukraine in order to continue the conflict

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> The Ukraine War, How the British Derailed Peace The Ukraine War, How the British Derailed Peace BATTLEFORWORLD.COM | November 25, 2023: Ex-Pentagon analyst revealed that the West refused to support the Ukraine-Russia peace talks and is now seeking a way out. The leader of the Servant of the People faction in the Ukrainian parliament, Davyd Arakhamia, disclosed that the March 2022 Russian-Ukrainian peace talks was a no go because then UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson brought the negotiations to zero, to have Ukraine continue the conflict. And to pressure the Kiev regime, that was when the “Bucha massacre” appeared at the appropriate time to derailed the peace talks that was ongoing in Turkey. The Bucha massacre was later debunked by Russia as a hoax, but the damage was already done to smear Russia on the world stage, to which the UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson continued along pushing the war stroking the conflict as various countries kept on supplying all sorts of weapons. According to Arakhamia, the Russians were willing to end the conflict if Ukraine was to agree to neutrality and provide guarantees to not join NATO. Arakhamia referenced an interview he gave to Ukrainian TV channel 1+1, saying: “When we returned from Istanbul, Boris Johnson came to Kiev and said: ‘We won’t sign anything with them at all, and let’s just fight’.” Continue at BATTLEFORWORLD.COM (In the Silent Revolution Of Truth, Compilation Edition, Volume 4, the free PDF book: Download and read: Zelensky Secretly Becomes an Oligarch, page 110. Zelensky Perpetuates the War and Murders in Ukraine, page 119. Zelensky is Running a NAZI-Style NAZI Regency in Kiev, page 147. Zelensky Inciting Enemies of the Jews Against the Jews, page 164. Neo-Nazis in Germany to Supply Zelensky with Weapons Against Russia, page 268. When Those Of The Northern Pole Are United Together, page 10. Note: Use the page number display located at top right to find the correct page. Free Book, PDF Format – Links: Book Summary | and Download Volume 4 Book) (In the Silent Revolution Of Truth, Compilation Edition, Volume 7, the free PDF book: Download and read: The Creation-Energy Teaching, repetition is necessary, for the basic Creation-Energy knowledge and understanding to breakthrough, page I-1. See what happens during the death of the body, our rest and rebirth (Note: first time presented in history), page 61. The Twelve Recommendations/Commandments, page 140. A Prayer Written by Jmmanuel / Immanuel / Emmanuel (- the ORIGINAL PARYER), pages 16 – 17. The Human with a Part-Piece of the Creation-Energy, page 89. Note: Use the page number display located at top right to find the correct page. Free Book, PDF Format – Links: Book Summary | and Download Volume 7 Book) Boris Johnson and Zelensky. END Anyone can join. Anyone can contribute. Anyone can become informed about their world. "United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends. Humic & Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex HerbAnomic’s Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex is a revolutionary new Humic and Fulvic Acid Complex designed to support your body at the cellular level. Our product has been thoroughly tested by an ISO/IEC Certified Lab for toxins and Heavy metals as well as for trace mineral content. We KNOW we have NO lead, arsenic, mercury, aluminum etc. in our Formula. This Humic & Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral complex has high trace levels of naturally occurring Humic and Fulvic Acids as well as high trace levels of Zinc, Iron, Magnesium, Molybdenum, Potassium and more. There is a wide range of up to 70 trace minerals which occur naturally in our Complex at varying levels. We Choose to list the 8 substances which occur in higher trace levels on our supplement panel. We don’t claim a high number of minerals as other Humic and Fulvic Supplements do and leave you to guess which elements you’ll be getting. Order Your Humic Fulvic for Your Family by Clicking on this Link, or the Banner Below. Our Formula is an exceptional value compared to other Humic Fulvic Minerals because... It’s OXYGENATED It Always Tests at 9.5+ pH Preservative and Chemical Free Allergen Free Comes From a Pure, Unpolluted, Organic Source Is an Excellent Source for Trace Minerals Is From Whole, Prehisoric Plant Based Origin Material With Ionic Minerals and Constituents Highly Conductive/Full of Extra Electrons Is a Full Spectrum Complex Our Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex has Minerals, Amino Acids, Poly Electrolytes, Phytochemicals, Polyphenols, Bioflavonoids and Trace Vitamins included with the Humic and Fulvic Acid. Our Source material is high in these constituents, where other manufacturers use inferior materials. Try Our Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex today. Be 100% Satisfied or Receive a Full Money Back Guarantee. Order Yours Today by Following This Link. </document> <category> URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: Diplomacy does/will not work </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The article talks about how peace talks between Russia and Ukraine were undermined by Boris Johnson, as well as the Bucha massacre being used to justify the rejection of the talks.

EN_UA_102415.txt

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: Diplomacy does/will not work

The text has several paragraphs arguing that diplomatic efforts are undermined by Western countries such as the UK, which obstructed peace talks between Russian and Ukraine in order to continue the conflict

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Why the Media Don’t Want to Know the Truth About the Nord Stream Blasts by Jonathan Cook, The Unz Review: No one but the terminally naïve should be surprised that security services lie – and that they are all but certain to cover their tracks when they carry out operations that either violate domestic or international law or that would be near-universally rejected by their own populations. Which is reason enough why anyone following the fallout from explosions last September that ripped holes in three of the four Nord Stream pipelines in the Baltic Sea supplying Russian gas to Europe should be wary of accepting anything Western agencies have to say on the matter. TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/ In fact, the only thing that Western publics should trust is the consensus among “investigators” that the three simultaneous blasts deep underwater on the pipelines – a fourth charge apparently failed to detonate – were sabotage, not some freak coincidental accident. Someone blew up the Nord Stream pipelines, creating an untold environmental catastrophe as the pipes leaked huge quantities of methane, a supremely active global-warming gas. It was an act of unrivaled industrial and environmental terrorism. If Washington had been able to pin the explosions on Russia, as it initially hoped, it would have done so with full vigor. There is nothing Western states would like more than to intensify world fury against Moscow, especially in the context of NATO’s express efforts to “weaken” Russia through a proxy war waged in Ukraine. But, after the claim made the rounds of front pages for a week or two, the story of Russia destroying its own pipelines was quietly shelved. That was partly because it seemed too difficult to maintain a narrative in which Moscow chose to destroy a critical part of its own energy infrastructure. Not only did the explosions cause Russia great financial harm – the country’s gas and oil revenues regularly financed nearly half of its annual budget – but the blasts removed Moscow’s chief influence over Germany, which had been until then heavily dependent on Russian gas. The initial media story required the Western public to believe that President Vladimir Putin willingly shot himself in the foot, losing his only leverage over European resolve to impose economic sanctions on his country. But even more than the complete lack of a Russian motive, Western states knew they would be unable to build a plausible forensic case against Moscow for the Nord Stream blasts. Instead, with no chance to milk the explosions for propaganda value, official Western interest in explaining what had happened to the Nord Stream pipelines wilted, despite the enormity of the event. That was reflected for months in an almost complete absence of media coverage. When the matter was raised, it was to argue that separate investigations by Sweden, Germany and Denmark were all drawing a blank. Sweden even refused to share any of its findings with Germany and Denmark, arguing that to do so would harm its “national security.” No one, again including the Western media, raised an eyebrow or showed a flicker of interest in what might be really going on behind the scenes. Western states and their compliant corporate media seemed quite ready to settle for the conclusion that this was a mystery cocooned in an enigma. Isolated and friendless It might have stayed that way forever, except that in February, a journalist – one of the most acclaimed investigative reporters of the past half-century – produced an account that finally demystified the explosions. Drawing on at least one anonymous, highly placed informant, Seymour Hersh pointed the finger for the explosions directly at the US administration and President Joe Biden himself. </document> <category> URW: Distrust towards Media: Western media is an instrument of propaganda </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The article has multiple paragraphs in which the Western media is depicted as incompetent and hiding the truth behind the attack on the nord stream gas pipelines, especially arguing that there was no evidence linking Russia with the attack while at the same time speculating the US and its allies carried out the attack.

EN_UA_014829.txt

URW: Distrust towards Media

URW: Distrust towards Media: Western media is an instrument of propaganda

The text criticise Western media for not investigating the explosion of Nord Stream and silencing the alleged evidence of the direct US involvement in the sabotage.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Why the Media Don’t Want to Know the Truth About the Nord Stream Blasts by Jonathan Cook, The Unz Review: No one but the terminally naïve should be surprised that security services lie – and that they are all but certain to cover their tracks when they carry out operations that either violate domestic or international law or that would be near-universally rejected by their own populations. Which is reason enough why anyone following the fallout from explosions last September that ripped holes in three of the four Nord Stream pipelines in the Baltic Sea supplying Russian gas to Europe should be wary of accepting anything Western agencies have to say on the matter. TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/ In fact, the only thing that Western publics should trust is the consensus among “investigators” that the three simultaneous blasts deep underwater on the pipelines – a fourth charge apparently failed to detonate – were sabotage, not some freak coincidental accident. Someone blew up the Nord Stream pipelines, creating an untold environmental catastrophe as the pipes leaked huge quantities of methane, a supremely active global-warming gas. It was an act of unrivaled industrial and environmental terrorism. If Washington had been able to pin the explosions on Russia, as it initially hoped, it would have done so with full vigor. There is nothing Western states would like more than to intensify world fury against Moscow, especially in the context of NATO’s express efforts to “weaken” Russia through a proxy war waged in Ukraine. But, after the claim made the rounds of front pages for a week or two, the story of Russia destroying its own pipelines was quietly shelved. That was partly because it seemed too difficult to maintain a narrative in which Moscow chose to destroy a critical part of its own energy infrastructure. Not only did the explosions cause Russia great financial harm – the country’s gas and oil revenues regularly financed nearly half of its annual budget – but the blasts removed Moscow’s chief influence over Germany, which had been until then heavily dependent on Russian gas. The initial media story required the Western public to believe that President Vladimir Putin willingly shot himself in the foot, losing his only leverage over European resolve to impose economic sanctions on his country. But even more than the complete lack of a Russian motive, Western states knew they would be unable to build a plausible forensic case against Moscow for the Nord Stream blasts. Instead, with no chance to milk the explosions for propaganda value, official Western interest in explaining what had happened to the Nord Stream pipelines wilted, despite the enormity of the event. That was reflected for months in an almost complete absence of media coverage. When the matter was raised, it was to argue that separate investigations by Sweden, Germany and Denmark were all drawing a blank. Sweden even refused to share any of its findings with Germany and Denmark, arguing that to do so would harm its “national security.” No one, again including the Western media, raised an eyebrow or showed a flicker of interest in what might be really going on behind the scenes. Western states and their compliant corporate media seemed quite ready to settle for the conclusion that this was a mystery cocooned in an enigma. Isolated and friendless It might have stayed that way forever, except that in February, a journalist – one of the most acclaimed investigative reporters of the past half-century – produced an account that finally demystified the explosions. Drawing on at least one anonymous, highly placed informant, Seymour Hersh pointed the finger for the explosions directly at the US administration and President Joe Biden himself. </document> <category> URW: Distrust towards Media: Western media is an instrument of propaganda </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Several paragraphs report that Western media has not properly investigated the Nord Stream pipeline sabotage, highlighting several inconsistencies of the official narrative. According to the author, the sabotage would be used as pretext for inflating Russophobic hysteria

EN_UA_014829.txt

URW: Distrust towards Media

URW: Distrust towards Media: Western media is an instrument of propaganda

The text criticise Western media for not investigating the explosion of Nord Stream and silencing the alleged evidence of the direct US involvement in the sabotage.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Why the Media Don’t Want to Know the Truth About the Nord Stream Blasts by Jonathan Cook, The Unz Review: No one but the terminally naïve should be surprised that security services lie – and that they are all but certain to cover their tracks when they carry out operations that either violate domestic or international law or that would be near-universally rejected by their own populations. Which is reason enough why anyone following the fallout from explosions last September that ripped holes in three of the four Nord Stream pipelines in the Baltic Sea supplying Russian gas to Europe should be wary of accepting anything Western agencies have to say on the matter. TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/ In fact, the only thing that Western publics should trust is the consensus among “investigators” that the three simultaneous blasts deep underwater on the pipelines – a fourth charge apparently failed to detonate – were sabotage, not some freak coincidental accident. Someone blew up the Nord Stream pipelines, creating an untold environmental catastrophe as the pipes leaked huge quantities of methane, a supremely active global-warming gas. It was an act of unrivaled industrial and environmental terrorism. If Washington had been able to pin the explosions on Russia, as it initially hoped, it would have done so with full vigor. There is nothing Western states would like more than to intensify world fury against Moscow, especially in the context of NATO’s express efforts to “weaken” Russia through a proxy war waged in Ukraine. But, after the claim made the rounds of front pages for a week or two, the story of Russia destroying its own pipelines was quietly shelved. That was partly because it seemed too difficult to maintain a narrative in which Moscow chose to destroy a critical part of its own energy infrastructure. Not only did the explosions cause Russia great financial harm – the country’s gas and oil revenues regularly financed nearly half of its annual budget – but the blasts removed Moscow’s chief influence over Germany, which had been until then heavily dependent on Russian gas. The initial media story required the Western public to believe that President Vladimir Putin willingly shot himself in the foot, losing his only leverage over European resolve to impose economic sanctions on his country. But even more than the complete lack of a Russian motive, Western states knew they would be unable to build a plausible forensic case against Moscow for the Nord Stream blasts. Instead, with no chance to milk the explosions for propaganda value, official Western interest in explaining what had happened to the Nord Stream pipelines wilted, despite the enormity of the event. That was reflected for months in an almost complete absence of media coverage. When the matter was raised, it was to argue that separate investigations by Sweden, Germany and Denmark were all drawing a blank. Sweden even refused to share any of its findings with Germany and Denmark, arguing that to do so would harm its “national security.” No one, again including the Western media, raised an eyebrow or showed a flicker of interest in what might be really going on behind the scenes. Western states and their compliant corporate media seemed quite ready to settle for the conclusion that this was a mystery cocooned in an enigma. Isolated and friendless It might have stayed that way forever, except that in February, a journalist – one of the most acclaimed investigative reporters of the past half-century – produced an account that finally demystified the explosions. Drawing on at least one anonymous, highly placed informant, Seymour Hersh pointed the finger for the explosions directly at the US administration and President Joe Biden himself. </document> <category> URW: Distrust towards Media: Western media is an instrument of propaganda </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Article claiming western media is a propaganda tool which is unwilling to investigate certain topics such as the sabotage of Nord Stream

EN_UA_014829.txt

URW: Distrust towards Media

URW: Distrust towards Media: Western media is an instrument of propaganda

The text criticise Western media for not investigating the explosion of Nord Stream and silencing the alleged evidence of the direct US involvement in the sabotage.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Why the Media Don’t Want to Know the Truth About the Nord Stream Blasts by Jonathan Cook, The Unz Review: No one but the terminally naïve should be surprised that security services lie – and that they are all but certain to cover their tracks when they carry out operations that either violate domestic or international law or that would be near-universally rejected by their own populations. Which is reason enough why anyone following the fallout from explosions last September that ripped holes in three of the four Nord Stream pipelines in the Baltic Sea supplying Russian gas to Europe should be wary of accepting anything Western agencies have to say on the matter. TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/ In fact, the only thing that Western publics should trust is the consensus among “investigators” that the three simultaneous blasts deep underwater on the pipelines – a fourth charge apparently failed to detonate – were sabotage, not some freak coincidental accident. Someone blew up the Nord Stream pipelines, creating an untold environmental catastrophe as the pipes leaked huge quantities of methane, a supremely active global-warming gas. It was an act of unrivaled industrial and environmental terrorism. If Washington had been able to pin the explosions on Russia, as it initially hoped, it would have done so with full vigor. There is nothing Western states would like more than to intensify world fury against Moscow, especially in the context of NATO’s express efforts to “weaken” Russia through a proxy war waged in Ukraine. But, after the claim made the rounds of front pages for a week or two, the story of Russia destroying its own pipelines was quietly shelved. That was partly because it seemed too difficult to maintain a narrative in which Moscow chose to destroy a critical part of its own energy infrastructure. Not only did the explosions cause Russia great financial harm – the country’s gas and oil revenues regularly financed nearly half of its annual budget – but the blasts removed Moscow’s chief influence over Germany, which had been until then heavily dependent on Russian gas. The initial media story required the Western public to believe that President Vladimir Putin willingly shot himself in the foot, losing his only leverage over European resolve to impose economic sanctions on his country. But even more than the complete lack of a Russian motive, Western states knew they would be unable to build a plausible forensic case against Moscow for the Nord Stream blasts. Instead, with no chance to milk the explosions for propaganda value, official Western interest in explaining what had happened to the Nord Stream pipelines wilted, despite the enormity of the event. That was reflected for months in an almost complete absence of media coverage. When the matter was raised, it was to argue that separate investigations by Sweden, Germany and Denmark were all drawing a blank. Sweden even refused to share any of its findings with Germany and Denmark, arguing that to do so would harm its “national security.” No one, again including the Western media, raised an eyebrow or showed a flicker of interest in what might be really going on behind the scenes. Western states and their compliant corporate media seemed quite ready to settle for the conclusion that this was a mystery cocooned in an enigma. Isolated and friendless It might have stayed that way forever, except that in February, a journalist – one of the most acclaimed investigative reporters of the past half-century – produced an account that finally demystified the explosions. Drawing on at least one anonymous, highly placed informant, Seymour Hersh pointed the finger for the explosions directly at the US administration and President Joe Biden himself. </document> <category> URW: Distrust towards Media: Western media is an instrument of propaganda </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Multiple paragraphs present arguments discrediting Western media as not properly informing about the Nordstream sabotage and the direct involvement of the US military.

EN_UA_014829.txt

URW: Distrust towards Media

URW: Distrust towards Media: Western media is an instrument of propaganda

The text criticise Western media for not investigating the explosion of Nord Stream and silencing the alleged evidence of the direct US involvement in the sabotage.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Why the Media Don’t Want to Know the Truth About the Nord Stream Blasts by Jonathan Cook, The Unz Review: No one but the terminally naïve should be surprised that security services lie – and that they are all but certain to cover their tracks when they carry out operations that either violate domestic or international law or that would be near-universally rejected by their own populations. Which is reason enough why anyone following the fallout from explosions last September that ripped holes in three of the four Nord Stream pipelines in the Baltic Sea supplying Russian gas to Europe should be wary of accepting anything Western agencies have to say on the matter. TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/ In fact, the only thing that Western publics should trust is the consensus among “investigators” that the three simultaneous blasts deep underwater on the pipelines – a fourth charge apparently failed to detonate – were sabotage, not some freak coincidental accident. Someone blew up the Nord Stream pipelines, creating an untold environmental catastrophe as the pipes leaked huge quantities of methane, a supremely active global-warming gas. It was an act of unrivaled industrial and environmental terrorism. If Washington had been able to pin the explosions on Russia, as it initially hoped, it would have done so with full vigor. There is nothing Western states would like more than to intensify world fury against Moscow, especially in the context of NATO’s express efforts to “weaken” Russia through a proxy war waged in Ukraine. But, after the claim made the rounds of front pages for a week or two, the story of Russia destroying its own pipelines was quietly shelved. That was partly because it seemed too difficult to maintain a narrative in which Moscow chose to destroy a critical part of its own energy infrastructure. Not only did the explosions cause Russia great financial harm – the country’s gas and oil revenues regularly financed nearly half of its annual budget – but the blasts removed Moscow’s chief influence over Germany, which had been until then heavily dependent on Russian gas. The initial media story required the Western public to believe that President Vladimir Putin willingly shot himself in the foot, losing his only leverage over European resolve to impose economic sanctions on his country. But even more than the complete lack of a Russian motive, Western states knew they would be unable to build a plausible forensic case against Moscow for the Nord Stream blasts. Instead, with no chance to milk the explosions for propaganda value, official Western interest in explaining what had happened to the Nord Stream pipelines wilted, despite the enormity of the event. That was reflected for months in an almost complete absence of media coverage. When the matter was raised, it was to argue that separate investigations by Sweden, Germany and Denmark were all drawing a blank. Sweden even refused to share any of its findings with Germany and Denmark, arguing that to do so would harm its “national security.” No one, again including the Western media, raised an eyebrow or showed a flicker of interest in what might be really going on behind the scenes. Western states and their compliant corporate media seemed quite ready to settle for the conclusion that this was a mystery cocooned in an enigma. Isolated and friendless It might have stayed that way forever, except that in February, a journalist – one of the most acclaimed investigative reporters of the past half-century – produced an account that finally demystified the explosions. Drawing on at least one anonymous, highly placed informant, Seymour Hersh pointed the finger for the explosions directly at the US administration and President Joe Biden himself. </document> <category> URW: Distrust towards Media: Western media is an instrument of propaganda </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The author uses several paragraphs to discredit western media as they failed to investigate the Nord Stream blasts. According to the author, Western media did not investigate the blasts since the results would be detrimental for the Western agenda

EN_UA_014829.txt

URW: Distrust towards Media

URW: Distrust towards Media: Western media is an instrument of propaganda

The text criticise Western media for not investigating the explosion of Nord Stream and silencing the alleged evidence of the direct US involvement in the sabotage.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> The Fed’s Climate Studies Are Full Of Hot Air The Federal Reserve’s credibility is in tatters. It predicted low inflation through 2021 even as the money supply exploded and higher inflation followed. To catch up, it quickly raised interest rates, stressing many banks, and Fed examiners failed to act before depositors noticed that Silicon Valley Bank was insolvent. The result was bank runs and panic. But instead of lowering inflation and preventing recession, many of the Fed’s 400 economists are busy fighting climate change. [emphasis, links added] Examples of climate activism abound. This year the Fed is forcing big banks to produce complex reports on their climate vulnerability in a “pilot project” that is sure to expand and might lead to lending restrictions. A query of the Fed’s listing of recent publications returns hundreds of research papers, press releases, and policy statements related to climate change. The San Francisco Fed hosted a conference on climate change in May, in which 27 Fed economists participated. With all this effort, one might hope the Fed would produce high-quality research on climate change. But I took a close look at two Fed studies on the subject and found shockingly poor analysis. These studies on the effect of temperature on U.S. and world economic growth are cited without a hint of skepticism and widely lavished with media attention. I’ve managed to debunk both. In the September issue of Econ Journal Watch, I discredited a paper from the Richmond Fed claiming that warming reduces economic growth in the U.S. I showed that the paper had serious problems with its statistical reasoning and robustness. My analysis concluded that the data used in the paper showed no meaningful relationship between temperatures and growth. More recently I published a critique of a study from the Federal Reserve Board claiming that a year of above-normal temperatures in countries around the world makes economic contraction more likely. The original study used sophisticated statistical techniques but failed to report that its primary finding was statistically insignificant. My request to the study’s author for computer code to reproduce the paper’s results went unanswered. I managed to write the code from scratch and exactly replicate the results, allowing me to run additional tests that the author didn’t report. The author’s primary result—that temperature has a bigger effect in bad than in good economic times—turned out to be statistically insignificant. Additional analysis showed that there is no reliable effect of temperature on growth at all. There are two main reasons why the Fed study appeared at first to show a statistically significant effect of temperatures on economic growth. First, each country in the sample had equal weight in the analysis. China had the same weight as St. Vincent though China’s population is 13,000 times as large. Equal weighting means that some small countries with unusual histories of economic growth greatly influenced the results. The paper’s results disappeared when countries like Rwanda and Equatorial Guinea—which had economic catastrophes and bonanzas unrelated to climate change—were omitted. Omitting similar countries representing less than 1% of the world’s gross domestic product was enough to eliminate the paper’s result. The complicated statistical techniques used in the Fed study magnified the influence of these unusual countries. There’s a second reason why the Fed study appears to find that temperature affects growth: Many poor countries have warm climates. A warm climate doesn’t preclude economic growth, as is demonstrated by Florida, Arizona, Taiwan, Singapore, and several Persian Gulf states. But the average poor country is warmer than the average rich country. Debate continues as to whether this correlation is random or causal, but the hypothesis of the Fed paper is that year-to-year increases in temperature reduce annual economic growth. The paper claims that its method controls for long-term differences in climate, but using simulated data I found that the Fed paper’s method can be fooled into finding an effect that doesn’t exist. The only thing to learn from the Fed’s research is that climate propaganda is spreading fast, and when it comes to climate, academic economists are no more deserving of trust than are other supposed scientists and experts. The Fed’s time would be better spent on more urgent matters, like improving its botched regulation of the banking system. h/t Steve B. Read more at WSJ Join our list Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox. </document> <category> CC: Questioning the measurements and science: Methodologies/metrics used are unreliable/faulty </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text criticises some scientific studies reporting the effects of climate change on the grounds that they are unreliable

EN_CC_100038.txt

CC: Questioning the measurements and science

CC: Questioning the measurements and science: Methodologies/metrics used are unreliable/faulty

The text question the scientific reliabilities of studies addressing climate change. Several paragraphs claim alleged scientific incongruences of papers which were mentioned and adopted by the Fed

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> The Fed’s Climate Studies Are Full Of Hot Air The Federal Reserve’s credibility is in tatters. It predicted low inflation through 2021 even as the money supply exploded and higher inflation followed. To catch up, it quickly raised interest rates, stressing many banks, and Fed examiners failed to act before depositors noticed that Silicon Valley Bank was insolvent. The result was bank runs and panic. But instead of lowering inflation and preventing recession, many of the Fed’s 400 economists are busy fighting climate change. [emphasis, links added] Examples of climate activism abound. This year the Fed is forcing big banks to produce complex reports on their climate vulnerability in a “pilot project” that is sure to expand and might lead to lending restrictions. A query of the Fed’s listing of recent publications returns hundreds of research papers, press releases, and policy statements related to climate change. The San Francisco Fed hosted a conference on climate change in May, in which 27 Fed economists participated. With all this effort, one might hope the Fed would produce high-quality research on climate change. But I took a close look at two Fed studies on the subject and found shockingly poor analysis. These studies on the effect of temperature on U.S. and world economic growth are cited without a hint of skepticism and widely lavished with media attention. I’ve managed to debunk both. In the September issue of Econ Journal Watch, I discredited a paper from the Richmond Fed claiming that warming reduces economic growth in the U.S. I showed that the paper had serious problems with its statistical reasoning and robustness. My analysis concluded that the data used in the paper showed no meaningful relationship between temperatures and growth. More recently I published a critique of a study from the Federal Reserve Board claiming that a year of above-normal temperatures in countries around the world makes economic contraction more likely. The original study used sophisticated statistical techniques but failed to report that its primary finding was statistically insignificant. My request to the study’s author for computer code to reproduce the paper’s results went unanswered. I managed to write the code from scratch and exactly replicate the results, allowing me to run additional tests that the author didn’t report. The author’s primary result—that temperature has a bigger effect in bad than in good economic times—turned out to be statistically insignificant. Additional analysis showed that there is no reliable effect of temperature on growth at all. There are two main reasons why the Fed study appeared at first to show a statistically significant effect of temperatures on economic growth. First, each country in the sample had equal weight in the analysis. China had the same weight as St. Vincent though China’s population is 13,000 times as large. Equal weighting means that some small countries with unusual histories of economic growth greatly influenced the results. The paper’s results disappeared when countries like Rwanda and Equatorial Guinea—which had economic catastrophes and bonanzas unrelated to climate change—were omitted. Omitting similar countries representing less than 1% of the world’s gross domestic product was enough to eliminate the paper’s result. The complicated statistical techniques used in the Fed study magnified the influence of these unusual countries. There’s a second reason why the Fed study appears to find that temperature affects growth: Many poor countries have warm climates. A warm climate doesn’t preclude economic growth, as is demonstrated by Florida, Arizona, Taiwan, Singapore, and several Persian Gulf states. But the average poor country is warmer than the average rich country. Debate continues as to whether this correlation is random or causal, but the hypothesis of the Fed paper is that year-to-year increases in temperature reduce annual economic growth. The paper claims that its method controls for long-term differences in climate, but using simulated data I found that the Fed paper’s method can be fooled into finding an effect that doesn’t exist. The only thing to learn from the Fed’s research is that climate propaganda is spreading fast, and when it comes to climate, academic economists are no more deserving of trust than are other supposed scientists and experts. The Fed’s time would be better spent on more urgent matters, like improving its botched regulation of the banking system. h/t Steve B. Read more at WSJ Join our list Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox. </document> <category> CC: Questioning the measurements and science: Methodologies/metrics used are unreliable/faulty </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The author questions the methodology used in a study regarding the effects of climate change, arguing that it is flawed and produced unreliable results. The author believes that the study could be used to restrict lending and argue against climate policies in the US

EN_CC_100038.txt

CC: Questioning the measurements and science

CC: Questioning the measurements and science: Methodologies/metrics used are unreliable/faulty

The text question the scientific reliabilities of studies addressing climate change. Several paragraphs claim alleged scientific incongruences of papers which were mentioned and adopted by the Fed

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> The Fed’s Climate Studies Are Full Of Hot Air The Federal Reserve’s credibility is in tatters. It predicted low inflation through 2021 even as the money supply exploded and higher inflation followed. To catch up, it quickly raised interest rates, stressing many banks, and Fed examiners failed to act before depositors noticed that Silicon Valley Bank was insolvent. The result was bank runs and panic. But instead of lowering inflation and preventing recession, many of the Fed’s 400 economists are busy fighting climate change. [emphasis, links added] Examples of climate activism abound. This year the Fed is forcing big banks to produce complex reports on their climate vulnerability in a “pilot project” that is sure to expand and might lead to lending restrictions. A query of the Fed’s listing of recent publications returns hundreds of research papers, press releases, and policy statements related to climate change. The San Francisco Fed hosted a conference on climate change in May, in which 27 Fed economists participated. With all this effort, one might hope the Fed would produce high-quality research on climate change. But I took a close look at two Fed studies on the subject and found shockingly poor analysis. These studies on the effect of temperature on U.S. and world economic growth are cited without a hint of skepticism and widely lavished with media attention. I’ve managed to debunk both. In the September issue of Econ Journal Watch, I discredited a paper from the Richmond Fed claiming that warming reduces economic growth in the U.S. I showed that the paper had serious problems with its statistical reasoning and robustness. My analysis concluded that the data used in the paper showed no meaningful relationship between temperatures and growth. More recently I published a critique of a study from the Federal Reserve Board claiming that a year of above-normal temperatures in countries around the world makes economic contraction more likely. The original study used sophisticated statistical techniques but failed to report that its primary finding was statistically insignificant. My request to the study’s author for computer code to reproduce the paper’s results went unanswered. I managed to write the code from scratch and exactly replicate the results, allowing me to run additional tests that the author didn’t report. The author’s primary result—that temperature has a bigger effect in bad than in good economic times—turned out to be statistically insignificant. Additional analysis showed that there is no reliable effect of temperature on growth at all. There are two main reasons why the Fed study appeared at first to show a statistically significant effect of temperatures on economic growth. First, each country in the sample had equal weight in the analysis. China had the same weight as St. Vincent though China’s population is 13,000 times as large. Equal weighting means that some small countries with unusual histories of economic growth greatly influenced the results. The paper’s results disappeared when countries like Rwanda and Equatorial Guinea—which had economic catastrophes and bonanzas unrelated to climate change—were omitted. Omitting similar countries representing less than 1% of the world’s gross domestic product was enough to eliminate the paper’s result. The complicated statistical techniques used in the Fed study magnified the influence of these unusual countries. There’s a second reason why the Fed study appears to find that temperature affects growth: Many poor countries have warm climates. A warm climate doesn’t preclude economic growth, as is demonstrated by Florida, Arizona, Taiwan, Singapore, and several Persian Gulf states. But the average poor country is warmer than the average rich country. Debate continues as to whether this correlation is random or causal, but the hypothesis of the Fed paper is that year-to-year increases in temperature reduce annual economic growth. The paper claims that its method controls for long-term differences in climate, but using simulated data I found that the Fed paper’s method can be fooled into finding an effect that doesn’t exist. The only thing to learn from the Fed’s research is that climate propaganda is spreading fast, and when it comes to climate, academic economists are no more deserving of trust than are other supposed scientists and experts. The Fed’s time would be better spent on more urgent matters, like improving its botched regulation of the banking system. h/t Steve B. Read more at WSJ Join our list Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox. </document> <category> CC: Questioning the measurements and science: Methodologies/metrics used are unreliable/faulty </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Throughout the text, the author attacks two Fed studies related to climate change arguing they are poorly conceived and statistically unreliable. He claims that they have no real world impact but are simply used as political tool to justify climate related regulation.

EN_CC_100038.txt

CC: Questioning the measurements and science

CC: Questioning the measurements and science: Methodologies/metrics used are unreliable/faulty

The text question the scientific reliabilities of studies addressing climate change. Several paragraphs claim alleged scientific incongruences of papers which were mentioned and adopted by the Fed

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> The Fed’s Climate Studies Are Full Of Hot Air The Federal Reserve’s credibility is in tatters. It predicted low inflation through 2021 even as the money supply exploded and higher inflation followed. To catch up, it quickly raised interest rates, stressing many banks, and Fed examiners failed to act before depositors noticed that Silicon Valley Bank was insolvent. The result was bank runs and panic. But instead of lowering inflation and preventing recession, many of the Fed’s 400 economists are busy fighting climate change. [emphasis, links added] Examples of climate activism abound. This year the Fed is forcing big banks to produce complex reports on their climate vulnerability in a “pilot project” that is sure to expand and might lead to lending restrictions. A query of the Fed’s listing of recent publications returns hundreds of research papers, press releases, and policy statements related to climate change. The San Francisco Fed hosted a conference on climate change in May, in which 27 Fed economists participated. With all this effort, one might hope the Fed would produce high-quality research on climate change. But I took a close look at two Fed studies on the subject and found shockingly poor analysis. These studies on the effect of temperature on U.S. and world economic growth are cited without a hint of skepticism and widely lavished with media attention. I’ve managed to debunk both. In the September issue of Econ Journal Watch, I discredited a paper from the Richmond Fed claiming that warming reduces economic growth in the U.S. I showed that the paper had serious problems with its statistical reasoning and robustness. My analysis concluded that the data used in the paper showed no meaningful relationship between temperatures and growth. More recently I published a critique of a study from the Federal Reserve Board claiming that a year of above-normal temperatures in countries around the world makes economic contraction more likely. The original study used sophisticated statistical techniques but failed to report that its primary finding was statistically insignificant. My request to the study’s author for computer code to reproduce the paper’s results went unanswered. I managed to write the code from scratch and exactly replicate the results, allowing me to run additional tests that the author didn’t report. The author’s primary result—that temperature has a bigger effect in bad than in good economic times—turned out to be statistically insignificant. Additional analysis showed that there is no reliable effect of temperature on growth at all. There are two main reasons why the Fed study appeared at first to show a statistically significant effect of temperatures on economic growth. First, each country in the sample had equal weight in the analysis. China had the same weight as St. Vincent though China’s population is 13,000 times as large. Equal weighting means that some small countries with unusual histories of economic growth greatly influenced the results. The paper’s results disappeared when countries like Rwanda and Equatorial Guinea—which had economic catastrophes and bonanzas unrelated to climate change—were omitted. Omitting similar countries representing less than 1% of the world’s gross domestic product was enough to eliminate the paper’s result. The complicated statistical techniques used in the Fed study magnified the influence of these unusual countries. There’s a second reason why the Fed study appears to find that temperature affects growth: Many poor countries have warm climates. A warm climate doesn’t preclude economic growth, as is demonstrated by Florida, Arizona, Taiwan, Singapore, and several Persian Gulf states. But the average poor country is warmer than the average rich country. Debate continues as to whether this correlation is random or causal, but the hypothesis of the Fed paper is that year-to-year increases in temperature reduce annual economic growth. The paper claims that its method controls for long-term differences in climate, but using simulated data I found that the Fed paper’s method can be fooled into finding an effect that doesn’t exist. The only thing to learn from the Fed’s research is that climate propaganda is spreading fast, and when it comes to climate, academic economists are no more deserving of trust than are other supposed scientists and experts. The Fed’s time would be better spent on more urgent matters, like improving its botched regulation of the banking system. h/t Steve B. Read more at WSJ Join our list Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox. </document> <category> CC: Questioning the measurements and science: Methodologies/metrics used are unreliable/faulty </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Article talks about climate studies conducted by the Fed having serious issues with their methods which invalidates their results. Author is arguing that since these studies are unreliable we cannot trust the research being conducted by scientists studying climate change

EN_CC_100038.txt

CC: Questioning the measurements and science

CC: Questioning the measurements and science: Methodologies/metrics used are unreliable/faulty

The text question the scientific reliabilities of studies addressing climate change. Several paragraphs claim alleged scientific incongruences of papers which were mentioned and adopted by the Fed

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> The Fed’s Climate Studies Are Full Of Hot Air The Federal Reserve’s credibility is in tatters. It predicted low inflation through 2021 even as the money supply exploded and higher inflation followed. To catch up, it quickly raised interest rates, stressing many banks, and Fed examiners failed to act before depositors noticed that Silicon Valley Bank was insolvent. The result was bank runs and panic. But instead of lowering inflation and preventing recession, many of the Fed’s 400 economists are busy fighting climate change. [emphasis, links added] Examples of climate activism abound. This year the Fed is forcing big banks to produce complex reports on their climate vulnerability in a “pilot project” that is sure to expand and might lead to lending restrictions. A query of the Fed’s listing of recent publications returns hundreds of research papers, press releases, and policy statements related to climate change. The San Francisco Fed hosted a conference on climate change in May, in which 27 Fed economists participated. With all this effort, one might hope the Fed would produce high-quality research on climate change. But I took a close look at two Fed studies on the subject and found shockingly poor analysis. These studies on the effect of temperature on U.S. and world economic growth are cited without a hint of skepticism and widely lavished with media attention. I’ve managed to debunk both. In the September issue of Econ Journal Watch, I discredited a paper from the Richmond Fed claiming that warming reduces economic growth in the U.S. I showed that the paper had serious problems with its statistical reasoning and robustness. My analysis concluded that the data used in the paper showed no meaningful relationship between temperatures and growth. More recently I published a critique of a study from the Federal Reserve Board claiming that a year of above-normal temperatures in countries around the world makes economic contraction more likely. The original study used sophisticated statistical techniques but failed to report that its primary finding was statistically insignificant. My request to the study’s author for computer code to reproduce the paper’s results went unanswered. I managed to write the code from scratch and exactly replicate the results, allowing me to run additional tests that the author didn’t report. The author’s primary result—that temperature has a bigger effect in bad than in good economic times—turned out to be statistically insignificant. Additional analysis showed that there is no reliable effect of temperature on growth at all. There are two main reasons why the Fed study appeared at first to show a statistically significant effect of temperatures on economic growth. First, each country in the sample had equal weight in the analysis. China had the same weight as St. Vincent though China’s population is 13,000 times as large. Equal weighting means that some small countries with unusual histories of economic growth greatly influenced the results. The paper’s results disappeared when countries like Rwanda and Equatorial Guinea—which had economic catastrophes and bonanzas unrelated to climate change—were omitted. Omitting similar countries representing less than 1% of the world’s gross domestic product was enough to eliminate the paper’s result. The complicated statistical techniques used in the Fed study magnified the influence of these unusual countries. There’s a second reason why the Fed study appears to find that temperature affects growth: Many poor countries have warm climates. A warm climate doesn’t preclude economic growth, as is demonstrated by Florida, Arizona, Taiwan, Singapore, and several Persian Gulf states. But the average poor country is warmer than the average rich country. Debate continues as to whether this correlation is random or causal, but the hypothesis of the Fed paper is that year-to-year increases in temperature reduce annual economic growth. The paper claims that its method controls for long-term differences in climate, but using simulated data I found that the Fed paper’s method can be fooled into finding an effect that doesn’t exist. The only thing to learn from the Fed’s research is that climate propaganda is spreading fast, and when it comes to climate, academic economists are no more deserving of trust than are other supposed scientists and experts. The Fed’s time would be better spent on more urgent matters, like improving its botched regulation of the banking system. h/t Steve B. Read more at WSJ Join our list Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox. </document> <category> CC: Questioning the measurements and science: Methodologies/metrics used are unreliable/faulty </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The author claims that a study made by the Fed has serious flaws in terms of data and the methods used for the analysis, concluding that the result has no basis.

EN_CC_100038.txt

CC: Questioning the measurements and science

CC: Questioning the measurements and science: Methodologies/metrics used are unreliable/faulty

The text question the scientific reliabilities of studies addressing climate change. Several paragraphs claim alleged scientific incongruences of papers which were mentioned and adopted by the Fed

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> MSM Admits "Magical Thinking" Guided Its Reporting On Ukraine... Many Thousands Of Deaths Later MSM Admits "Magical Thinking" Guided Its Reporting On Ukraine... Many Thousands Of Deaths Later A very short while ago, any US politician or media pundit publicly calling for peace negotiations in Ukraine with Russia's Putin was branded 'pro-Kremlin' and somehow compromised. For example, mainstream media has sought to isolate and cancel thinkers like John Mearsheimer for his realism toward Moscow and the conflict, and urging immediate ceasefire which would require territorial concessions from Kiev. It was only in September that one prominent publication branded him "the world's most hated thinker." But now, at a moment Ukraine's leadership itself has become more desperate while admitting its forces are facing almost insurmountable odds, the D.C. beltway consensus has clearly and drastically changed, and now it's apparently okay to admit the following... The War Street Journal acknowledges that the narratives it’s been pushing for months — of a successful Ukrainian counteroffensive, a possible palace coup in Moscow, a Russian economy in tatters — are “Magical Thinking.” In other words, their coverage has been a fraud. pic.twitter.com/ZxB25W61Kn— David Sacks (@DavidSacks) November 16, 2023 The WSJ piece actually calls for a longer-term strategy of confronting Russia, while also admitting that Washington's approach thus far has been based on "magical thinking". Or else we might just call the establishment narrative to this point fraudulent: What Western leaders conspicuously haven’t done is level with their publics about the enduring nature of the threat from an emboldened, revisionist Russia. They have indulged all too often in magical thinking—betting on sanctions, a successful Ukrainian counter-offensive or the transfer of new types of weapons to force the Kremlin to come to the negotiating table. Or they have hoped to see Putin overthrown in a palace coup. Elsewhere in the article, the authors point out that contrary to how the Wagner rebellion was widely presented in Western press, the reality is that whole episode actually strengthened Putin: As Russian President Vladimir Putin looks toward the second anniversary of his all-out assault on Ukraine, his self-confidence is hard to miss. A much-anticipated Ukrainian counter-offensive has not achieved the breakthrough that would give Kyiv a strong hand to negotiate. Tumult in the Middle East dominates the headlines, and bipartisan support for Ukraine in the U.S. has been upended by polarization and dysfunction in Congress... Putin has reason to believe that time is on his side. At the front line, there are no indications that Russia is losing what has become a war of attrition. The Russian economy has been buffeted, but it is not in tatters. Putin’s hold on power was, paradoxically, strengthened following Yevgeny Prigozhin’s failed rebellion in June. Popular support for the war remains solid, and elite backing for Putin has not fractured. The tragedy is that so many people from both sides died for a year for nothing— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) November 16, 2023 Of course, none of this has stopped Zelensky as well as his friends in US Congress from seeking to push through more billions in American taxpayer aid for Ukraine. On a global level too, Moscow has made inroads and gotten closer with other well-armed powers who find themselves in Washington's crosshairs... Zelensky has recently complained that "Russia's goal" to take the global focus away from the Ukraine war is working, particularly against the backdrop of the Israel-Hamas conflict and rising tensions in the Middle East. But certainly for now, Ukraine has taken a far backseat among the list of current Biden administration priorities, it seems. Perhaps indeed there's less "magical thinking" these days. * * * US headlines with "Ukraine winning" in them, data via Bloomberg: </document> <category> URW: Distrust towards Media: Western media is an instrument of propaganda </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The author suggests that Western media is infuenced by political pressure to adopt certain views regarding the conflict, highlighting the flip-flop in media coverage over time as an example of it

EN_UA_102892.txt

URW: Distrust towards Media

URW: Distrust towards Media: Western media is an instrument of propaganda

The text conveys a narrative praising Russia, its military, Vladimir Putin and blaming Western media. Several paragraphs address these points directly, while others do it in a more indirect way since they criticise and underline the weakness of Western countries and their help to Ukraine, pointing out their excessive anti-Russian rhetoric.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> MSM Admits "Magical Thinking" Guided Its Reporting On Ukraine... Many Thousands Of Deaths Later MSM Admits "Magical Thinking" Guided Its Reporting On Ukraine... Many Thousands Of Deaths Later A very short while ago, any US politician or media pundit publicly calling for peace negotiations in Ukraine with Russia's Putin was branded 'pro-Kremlin' and somehow compromised. For example, mainstream media has sought to isolate and cancel thinkers like John Mearsheimer for his realism toward Moscow and the conflict, and urging immediate ceasefire which would require territorial concessions from Kiev. It was only in September that one prominent publication branded him "the world's most hated thinker." But now, at a moment Ukraine's leadership itself has become more desperate while admitting its forces are facing almost insurmountable odds, the D.C. beltway consensus has clearly and drastically changed, and now it's apparently okay to admit the following... The War Street Journal acknowledges that the narratives it’s been pushing for months — of a successful Ukrainian counteroffensive, a possible palace coup in Moscow, a Russian economy in tatters — are “Magical Thinking.” In other words, their coverage has been a fraud. pic.twitter.com/ZxB25W61Kn— David Sacks (@DavidSacks) November 16, 2023 The WSJ piece actually calls for a longer-term strategy of confronting Russia, while also admitting that Washington's approach thus far has been based on "magical thinking". Or else we might just call the establishment narrative to this point fraudulent: What Western leaders conspicuously haven’t done is level with their publics about the enduring nature of the threat from an emboldened, revisionist Russia. They have indulged all too often in magical thinking—betting on sanctions, a successful Ukrainian counter-offensive or the transfer of new types of weapons to force the Kremlin to come to the negotiating table. Or they have hoped to see Putin overthrown in a palace coup. Elsewhere in the article, the authors point out that contrary to how the Wagner rebellion was widely presented in Western press, the reality is that whole episode actually strengthened Putin: As Russian President Vladimir Putin looks toward the second anniversary of his all-out assault on Ukraine, his self-confidence is hard to miss. A much-anticipated Ukrainian counter-offensive has not achieved the breakthrough that would give Kyiv a strong hand to negotiate. Tumult in the Middle East dominates the headlines, and bipartisan support for Ukraine in the U.S. has been upended by polarization and dysfunction in Congress... Putin has reason to believe that time is on his side. At the front line, there are no indications that Russia is losing what has become a war of attrition. The Russian economy has been buffeted, but it is not in tatters. Putin’s hold on power was, paradoxically, strengthened following Yevgeny Prigozhin’s failed rebellion in June. Popular support for the war remains solid, and elite backing for Putin has not fractured. The tragedy is that so many people from both sides died for a year for nothing— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) November 16, 2023 Of course, none of this has stopped Zelensky as well as his friends in US Congress from seeking to push through more billions in American taxpayer aid for Ukraine. On a global level too, Moscow has made inroads and gotten closer with other well-armed powers who find themselves in Washington's crosshairs... Zelensky has recently complained that "Russia's goal" to take the global focus away from the Ukraine war is working, particularly against the backdrop of the Israel-Hamas conflict and rising tensions in the Middle East. But certainly for now, Ukraine has taken a far backseat among the list of current Biden administration priorities, it seems. Perhaps indeed there's less "magical thinking" these days. * * * US headlines with "Ukraine winning" in them, data via Bloomberg: </document> <category> URW: Distrust towards Media: Western media is an instrument of propaganda </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Throughout several paragraphs, the article attacks Western media and consideres it unreliable, using several adjectives such as "fraudulent".

EN_UA_102892.txt

URW: Distrust towards Media

URW: Distrust towards Media: Western media is an instrument of propaganda

The text conveys a narrative praising Russia, its military, Vladimir Putin and blaming Western media. Several paragraphs address these points directly, while others do it in a more indirect way since they criticise and underline the weakness of Western countries and their help to Ukraine, pointing out their excessive anti-Russian rhetoric.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> MSM Admits "Magical Thinking" Guided Its Reporting On Ukraine... Many Thousands Of Deaths Later MSM Admits "Magical Thinking" Guided Its Reporting On Ukraine... Many Thousands Of Deaths Later A very short while ago, any US politician or media pundit publicly calling for peace negotiations in Ukraine with Russia's Putin was branded 'pro-Kremlin' and somehow compromised. For example, mainstream media has sought to isolate and cancel thinkers like John Mearsheimer for his realism toward Moscow and the conflict, and urging immediate ceasefire which would require territorial concessions from Kiev. It was only in September that one prominent publication branded him "the world's most hated thinker." But now, at a moment Ukraine's leadership itself has become more desperate while admitting its forces are facing almost insurmountable odds, the D.C. beltway consensus has clearly and drastically changed, and now it's apparently okay to admit the following... The War Street Journal acknowledges that the narratives it’s been pushing for months — of a successful Ukrainian counteroffensive, a possible palace coup in Moscow, a Russian economy in tatters — are “Magical Thinking.” In other words, their coverage has been a fraud. pic.twitter.com/ZxB25W61Kn— David Sacks (@DavidSacks) November 16, 2023 The WSJ piece actually calls for a longer-term strategy of confronting Russia, while also admitting that Washington's approach thus far has been based on "magical thinking". Or else we might just call the establishment narrative to this point fraudulent: What Western leaders conspicuously haven’t done is level with their publics about the enduring nature of the threat from an emboldened, revisionist Russia. They have indulged all too often in magical thinking—betting on sanctions, a successful Ukrainian counter-offensive or the transfer of new types of weapons to force the Kremlin to come to the negotiating table. Or they have hoped to see Putin overthrown in a palace coup. Elsewhere in the article, the authors point out that contrary to how the Wagner rebellion was widely presented in Western press, the reality is that whole episode actually strengthened Putin: As Russian President Vladimir Putin looks toward the second anniversary of his all-out assault on Ukraine, his self-confidence is hard to miss. A much-anticipated Ukrainian counter-offensive has not achieved the breakthrough that would give Kyiv a strong hand to negotiate. Tumult in the Middle East dominates the headlines, and bipartisan support for Ukraine in the U.S. has been upended by polarization and dysfunction in Congress... Putin has reason to believe that time is on his side. At the front line, there are no indications that Russia is losing what has become a war of attrition. The Russian economy has been buffeted, but it is not in tatters. Putin’s hold on power was, paradoxically, strengthened following Yevgeny Prigozhin’s failed rebellion in June. Popular support for the war remains solid, and elite backing for Putin has not fractured. The tragedy is that so many people from both sides died for a year for nothing— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) November 16, 2023 Of course, none of this has stopped Zelensky as well as his friends in US Congress from seeking to push through more billions in American taxpayer aid for Ukraine. On a global level too, Moscow has made inroads and gotten closer with other well-armed powers who find themselves in Washington's crosshairs... Zelensky has recently complained that "Russia's goal" to take the global focus away from the Ukraine war is working, particularly against the backdrop of the Israel-Hamas conflict and rising tensions in the Middle East. But certainly for now, Ukraine has taken a far backseat among the list of current Biden administration priorities, it seems. Perhaps indeed there's less "magical thinking" these days. * * * US headlines with "Ukraine winning" in them, data via Bloomberg: </document> <category> URW: Distrust towards Media: Western media is an instrument of propaganda </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Multiple paragraphs within the text present alleged evidence of Western media being an instrument of propaganda, specifically claiming that media companies adopted a narrative which was later proven false.

EN_UA_102892.txt

URW: Distrust towards Media

URW: Distrust towards Media: Western media is an instrument of propaganda

The text conveys a narrative praising Russia, its military, Vladimir Putin and blaming Western media. Several paragraphs address these points directly, while others do it in a more indirect way since they criticise and underline the weakness of Western countries and their help to Ukraine, pointing out their excessive anti-Russian rhetoric.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> MSM Admits "Magical Thinking" Guided Its Reporting On Ukraine... Many Thousands Of Deaths Later MSM Admits "Magical Thinking" Guided Its Reporting On Ukraine... Many Thousands Of Deaths Later A very short while ago, any US politician or media pundit publicly calling for peace negotiations in Ukraine with Russia's Putin was branded 'pro-Kremlin' and somehow compromised. For example, mainstream media has sought to isolate and cancel thinkers like John Mearsheimer for his realism toward Moscow and the conflict, and urging immediate ceasefire which would require territorial concessions from Kiev. It was only in September that one prominent publication branded him "the world's most hated thinker." But now, at a moment Ukraine's leadership itself has become more desperate while admitting its forces are facing almost insurmountable odds, the D.C. beltway consensus has clearly and drastically changed, and now it's apparently okay to admit the following... The War Street Journal acknowledges that the narratives it’s been pushing for months — of a successful Ukrainian counteroffensive, a possible palace coup in Moscow, a Russian economy in tatters — are “Magical Thinking.” In other words, their coverage has been a fraud. pic.twitter.com/ZxB25W61Kn— David Sacks (@DavidSacks) November 16, 2023 The WSJ piece actually calls for a longer-term strategy of confronting Russia, while also admitting that Washington's approach thus far has been based on "magical thinking". Or else we might just call the establishment narrative to this point fraudulent: What Western leaders conspicuously haven’t done is level with their publics about the enduring nature of the threat from an emboldened, revisionist Russia. They have indulged all too often in magical thinking—betting on sanctions, a successful Ukrainian counter-offensive or the transfer of new types of weapons to force the Kremlin to come to the negotiating table. Or they have hoped to see Putin overthrown in a palace coup. Elsewhere in the article, the authors point out that contrary to how the Wagner rebellion was widely presented in Western press, the reality is that whole episode actually strengthened Putin: As Russian President Vladimir Putin looks toward the second anniversary of his all-out assault on Ukraine, his self-confidence is hard to miss. A much-anticipated Ukrainian counter-offensive has not achieved the breakthrough that would give Kyiv a strong hand to negotiate. Tumult in the Middle East dominates the headlines, and bipartisan support for Ukraine in the U.S. has been upended by polarization and dysfunction in Congress... Putin has reason to believe that time is on his side. At the front line, there are no indications that Russia is losing what has become a war of attrition. The Russian economy has been buffeted, but it is not in tatters. Putin’s hold on power was, paradoxically, strengthened following Yevgeny Prigozhin’s failed rebellion in June. Popular support for the war remains solid, and elite backing for Putin has not fractured. The tragedy is that so many people from both sides died for a year for nothing— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) November 16, 2023 Of course, none of this has stopped Zelensky as well as his friends in US Congress from seeking to push through more billions in American taxpayer aid for Ukraine. On a global level too, Moscow has made inroads and gotten closer with other well-armed powers who find themselves in Washington's crosshairs... Zelensky has recently complained that "Russia's goal" to take the global focus away from the Ukraine war is working, particularly against the backdrop of the Israel-Hamas conflict and rising tensions in the Middle East. But certainly for now, Ukraine has taken a far backseat among the list of current Biden administration priorities, it seems. Perhaps indeed there's less "magical thinking" these days. * * * US headlines with "Ukraine winning" in them, data via Bloomberg: </document> <category> URW: Distrust towards Media: Western media is an instrument of propaganda </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text suggests that Western media is not reliable since it changed its narrative according to the situation. The text mentions specific articles and authors and suggests they are alarmists.

EN_UA_102892.txt

URW: Distrust towards Media

URW: Distrust towards Media: Western media is an instrument of propaganda

The text conveys a narrative praising Russia, its military, Vladimir Putin and blaming Western media. Several paragraphs address these points directly, while others do it in a more indirect way since they criticise and underline the weakness of Western countries and their help to Ukraine, pointing out their excessive anti-Russian rhetoric.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> MSM Admits "Magical Thinking" Guided Its Reporting On Ukraine... Many Thousands Of Deaths Later MSM Admits "Magical Thinking" Guided Its Reporting On Ukraine... Many Thousands Of Deaths Later A very short while ago, any US politician or media pundit publicly calling for peace negotiations in Ukraine with Russia's Putin was branded 'pro-Kremlin' and somehow compromised. For example, mainstream media has sought to isolate and cancel thinkers like John Mearsheimer for his realism toward Moscow and the conflict, and urging immediate ceasefire which would require territorial concessions from Kiev. It was only in September that one prominent publication branded him "the world's most hated thinker." But now, at a moment Ukraine's leadership itself has become more desperate while admitting its forces are facing almost insurmountable odds, the D.C. beltway consensus has clearly and drastically changed, and now it's apparently okay to admit the following... The War Street Journal acknowledges that the narratives it’s been pushing for months — of a successful Ukrainian counteroffensive, a possible palace coup in Moscow, a Russian economy in tatters — are “Magical Thinking.” In other words, their coverage has been a fraud. pic.twitter.com/ZxB25W61Kn— David Sacks (@DavidSacks) November 16, 2023 The WSJ piece actually calls for a longer-term strategy of confronting Russia, while also admitting that Washington's approach thus far has been based on "magical thinking". Or else we might just call the establishment narrative to this point fraudulent: What Western leaders conspicuously haven’t done is level with their publics about the enduring nature of the threat from an emboldened, revisionist Russia. They have indulged all too often in magical thinking—betting on sanctions, a successful Ukrainian counter-offensive or the transfer of new types of weapons to force the Kremlin to come to the negotiating table. Or they have hoped to see Putin overthrown in a palace coup. Elsewhere in the article, the authors point out that contrary to how the Wagner rebellion was widely presented in Western press, the reality is that whole episode actually strengthened Putin: As Russian President Vladimir Putin looks toward the second anniversary of his all-out assault on Ukraine, his self-confidence is hard to miss. A much-anticipated Ukrainian counter-offensive has not achieved the breakthrough that would give Kyiv a strong hand to negotiate. Tumult in the Middle East dominates the headlines, and bipartisan support for Ukraine in the U.S. has been upended by polarization and dysfunction in Congress... Putin has reason to believe that time is on his side. At the front line, there are no indications that Russia is losing what has become a war of attrition. The Russian economy has been buffeted, but it is not in tatters. Putin’s hold on power was, paradoxically, strengthened following Yevgeny Prigozhin’s failed rebellion in June. Popular support for the war remains solid, and elite backing for Putin has not fractured. The tragedy is that so many people from both sides died for a year for nothing— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) November 16, 2023 Of course, none of this has stopped Zelensky as well as his friends in US Congress from seeking to push through more billions in American taxpayer aid for Ukraine. On a global level too, Moscow has made inroads and gotten closer with other well-armed powers who find themselves in Washington's crosshairs... Zelensky has recently complained that "Russia's goal" to take the global focus away from the Ukraine war is working, particularly against the backdrop of the Israel-Hamas conflict and rising tensions in the Middle East. But certainly for now, Ukraine has taken a far backseat among the list of current Biden administration priorities, it seems. Perhaps indeed there's less "magical thinking" these days. * * * US headlines with "Ukraine winning" in them, data via Bloomberg: </document> <category> URW: Distrust towards Media: Western media is an instrument of propaganda </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Several paragraphs present alleged evidence of Western media adopting a Russophobic and anti-Ukrainian discourse. It is also mentioned that the narrative that Ukraine is winning has been questioned, underlining the inconsistency of this information.

EN_UA_102892.txt

URW: Distrust towards Media

URW: Distrust towards Media: Western media is an instrument of propaganda

The text conveys a narrative praising Russia, its military, Vladimir Putin and blaming Western media. Several paragraphs address these points directly, while others do it in a more indirect way since they criticise and underline the weakness of Western countries and their help to Ukraine, pointing out their excessive anti-Russian rhetoric.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Biden Unveils Strict Auto Standards to Speed EV Shift President Joe Biden's administration announced Wednesday revised pollution standards for cars and trucks meant to accelerate the US auto industry's shift to electric to mitigate climate change. The rules set ambitious emission reductions for 2032 but are moderated somewhat compared with preliminary standards unveiled last April. Following carmaker criticism, the final rules give manufacturers greater flexibility and ease the benchmarks in the first three years. Those shifts were criticized as a sop to corporations from at least one environmental group, even as the final rule won praise from other leading NGOs focused on climate change. The final rules -- which were described by administration official as "the strongest ever" and would likely be undone if Republican Donald Trump defeats Biden in November -- still require a nearly 50 percent drop in fleet-wide emissions in 2032 compared with 2026 through increased sales of electric vehicles (EVs) and low-emission autos. The rules, which dovetail with other key Biden programs to build more EV charging stations and manufacturing facilities and incentivize EV sales, establish the environment as a significant point of difference in the 2024 presidential election. Trump has mocked climate change as a problem and cast the transition to EVs as a job-killer that will benefit China at the expense of American workers. Biden argues that US auto builders need to take the lead in the expanding EV market. "I brought together American automakers. I brought together American autoworkers," said Biden in a statement. "Together, we've made historic progress." Alluding to his target set three years ago that 50 percent of new vehicles in 2030 would be EVs, Biden predicted we'll meet my goal for 2030 and race forward in the years ahead." - Industry given more time - EVs accounted for 7.6 percent in 2023 sales, up from 5.9 percent in 2022, according to Cox Automotive. The original proposal had envisioned the EV share surging to as much as 67 percent of new vehicle sales by 2032. Carmakers, which are midway through sweeping, multi-billion-dollar investments to build more EV capacity, criticized the initial standards as overly-stringent. They cited the limited state of charging capacity in the United States that has dampened consumer demand, as well as difficulties in supply of metals and other raw materials for EV batteries. Following input from the auto industry, organized labor and auto dealerships, Biden administration officials decided to allow manufacturers a "variety of pathways" to reaching the standard, a senior Biden administration official said Tuesday. This path could include a mix of EVs, conventional but more fuel-efficient engines, and plug-in hybrid vehicles, which have seen a rise in demand of late. Biden administration officials opted to soften year-to-year emissions improvements in the 2027-2030 period, while maintaining the same target in 2032. Moderating the targets in these first three years "was the right call," said John Bozzella, president of the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, a Washington lobby representing carmakers. "These adjusted EV targets -– still a stretch goal –- should give the market and supply chains a chance to catch up," said Bozzella, adding that the extra time will allow more EV charging stations to come on-line. - Too many 'loopholes'? - The final standards set a fleet-wide target of 85 grams of carbon dioxide in 2032, down from 170 in 2027, according to an administration fact sheet. Wednesday's initiative won praise from leading environmental groups including the Sierra Club and NRDC, which said the new rules "take us in the right direction," according to a statement from NRDC chief Manish Bapna. But Dan Becker, director of the climate transport campaign at the Center for Biological Diversity, slammed the adjusted rules as "significantly weaker." "The EPA caved to pressure from Big Auto, Big Oil and car dealers and riddled the plan with loopholes big enough to drive a Ford F150 through," Becker said. "The weaker rule means cars and pickups spew more pollution, oil companies keep socking consumers at the pump, and automakers keep wielding well-practiced delay tactics." </document> <category> CC: Criticism of climate policies: Climate policies are ineffective </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text presents several paragraphs criticising climate-related policies on the US automotive sector. Among the arguments, the main one is that these policies are not effective as they are not stringent enough

EN_CC_200013.txt

CC: Criticism of climate policies

CC: Criticism of climate policies: Climate policies are ineffective

Within the context of the US, the text criticises climate policies promoted by Joe Biden's administration for being infeffective and weak. According to the text, they would allow car manufacturers to produce polluting vehicles since the regulations are too soft.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Biden Unveils Strict Auto Standards to Speed EV Shift President Joe Biden's administration announced Wednesday revised pollution standards for cars and trucks meant to accelerate the US auto industry's shift to electric to mitigate climate change. The rules set ambitious emission reductions for 2032 but are moderated somewhat compared with preliminary standards unveiled last April. Following carmaker criticism, the final rules give manufacturers greater flexibility and ease the benchmarks in the first three years. Those shifts were criticized as a sop to corporations from at least one environmental group, even as the final rule won praise from other leading NGOs focused on climate change. The final rules -- which were described by administration official as "the strongest ever" and would likely be undone if Republican Donald Trump defeats Biden in November -- still require a nearly 50 percent drop in fleet-wide emissions in 2032 compared with 2026 through increased sales of electric vehicles (EVs) and low-emission autos. The rules, which dovetail with other key Biden programs to build more EV charging stations and manufacturing facilities and incentivize EV sales, establish the environment as a significant point of difference in the 2024 presidential election. Trump has mocked climate change as a problem and cast the transition to EVs as a job-killer that will benefit China at the expense of American workers. Biden argues that US auto builders need to take the lead in the expanding EV market. "I brought together American automakers. I brought together American autoworkers," said Biden in a statement. "Together, we've made historic progress." Alluding to his target set three years ago that 50 percent of new vehicles in 2030 would be EVs, Biden predicted we'll meet my goal for 2030 and race forward in the years ahead." - Industry given more time - EVs accounted for 7.6 percent in 2023 sales, up from 5.9 percent in 2022, according to Cox Automotive. The original proposal had envisioned the EV share surging to as much as 67 percent of new vehicle sales by 2032. Carmakers, which are midway through sweeping, multi-billion-dollar investments to build more EV capacity, criticized the initial standards as overly-stringent. They cited the limited state of charging capacity in the United States that has dampened consumer demand, as well as difficulties in supply of metals and other raw materials for EV batteries. Following input from the auto industry, organized labor and auto dealerships, Biden administration officials decided to allow manufacturers a "variety of pathways" to reaching the standard, a senior Biden administration official said Tuesday. This path could include a mix of EVs, conventional but more fuel-efficient engines, and plug-in hybrid vehicles, which have seen a rise in demand of late. Biden administration officials opted to soften year-to-year emissions improvements in the 2027-2030 period, while maintaining the same target in 2032. Moderating the targets in these first three years "was the right call," said John Bozzella, president of the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, a Washington lobby representing carmakers. "These adjusted EV targets -– still a stretch goal –- should give the market and supply chains a chance to catch up," said Bozzella, adding that the extra time will allow more EV charging stations to come on-line. - Too many 'loopholes'? - The final standards set a fleet-wide target of 85 grams of carbon dioxide in 2032, down from 170 in 2027, according to an administration fact sheet. Wednesday's initiative won praise from leading environmental groups including the Sierra Club and NRDC, which said the new rules "take us in the right direction," according to a statement from NRDC chief Manish Bapna. But Dan Becker, director of the climate transport campaign at the Center for Biological Diversity, slammed the adjusted rules as "significantly weaker." "The EPA caved to pressure from Big Auto, Big Oil and car dealers and riddled the plan with loopholes big enough to drive a Ford F150 through," Becker said. "The weaker rule means cars and pickups spew more pollution, oil companies keep socking consumers at the pump, and automakers keep wielding well-practiced delay tactics." </document> <category> CC: Criticism of climate policies: Climate policies are ineffective </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Throughout several paragraphs, the text presents multiple passages arguing that climate policies adopted by the US administration are ineffective and inadequate, underlining that they would not be sufficient to counter CO2 emissions produced by the transportation sector.

EN_CC_200013.txt

CC: Criticism of climate policies

CC: Criticism of climate policies: Climate policies are ineffective

Within the context of the US, the text criticises climate policies promoted by Joe Biden's administration for being infeffective and weak. According to the text, they would allow car manufacturers to produce polluting vehicles since the regulations are too soft.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Biden Unveils Strict Auto Standards to Speed EV Shift President Joe Biden's administration announced Wednesday revised pollution standards for cars and trucks meant to accelerate the US auto industry's shift to electric to mitigate climate change. The rules set ambitious emission reductions for 2032 but are moderated somewhat compared with preliminary standards unveiled last April. Following carmaker criticism, the final rules give manufacturers greater flexibility and ease the benchmarks in the first three years. Those shifts were criticized as a sop to corporations from at least one environmental group, even as the final rule won praise from other leading NGOs focused on climate change. The final rules -- which were described by administration official as "the strongest ever" and would likely be undone if Republican Donald Trump defeats Biden in November -- still require a nearly 50 percent drop in fleet-wide emissions in 2032 compared with 2026 through increased sales of electric vehicles (EVs) and low-emission autos. The rules, which dovetail with other key Biden programs to build more EV charging stations and manufacturing facilities and incentivize EV sales, establish the environment as a significant point of difference in the 2024 presidential election. Trump has mocked climate change as a problem and cast the transition to EVs as a job-killer that will benefit China at the expense of American workers. Biden argues that US auto builders need to take the lead in the expanding EV market. "I brought together American automakers. I brought together American autoworkers," said Biden in a statement. "Together, we've made historic progress." Alluding to his target set three years ago that 50 percent of new vehicles in 2030 would be EVs, Biden predicted we'll meet my goal for 2030 and race forward in the years ahead." - Industry given more time - EVs accounted for 7.6 percent in 2023 sales, up from 5.9 percent in 2022, according to Cox Automotive. The original proposal had envisioned the EV share surging to as much as 67 percent of new vehicle sales by 2032. Carmakers, which are midway through sweeping, multi-billion-dollar investments to build more EV capacity, criticized the initial standards as overly-stringent. They cited the limited state of charging capacity in the United States that has dampened consumer demand, as well as difficulties in supply of metals and other raw materials for EV batteries. Following input from the auto industry, organized labor and auto dealerships, Biden administration officials decided to allow manufacturers a "variety of pathways" to reaching the standard, a senior Biden administration official said Tuesday. This path could include a mix of EVs, conventional but more fuel-efficient engines, and plug-in hybrid vehicles, which have seen a rise in demand of late. Biden administration officials opted to soften year-to-year emissions improvements in the 2027-2030 period, while maintaining the same target in 2032. Moderating the targets in these first three years "was the right call," said John Bozzella, president of the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, a Washington lobby representing carmakers. "These adjusted EV targets -– still a stretch goal –- should give the market and supply chains a chance to catch up," said Bozzella, adding that the extra time will allow more EV charging stations to come on-line. - Too many 'loopholes'? - The final standards set a fleet-wide target of 85 grams of carbon dioxide in 2032, down from 170 in 2027, according to an administration fact sheet. Wednesday's initiative won praise from leading environmental groups including the Sierra Club and NRDC, which said the new rules "take us in the right direction," according to a statement from NRDC chief Manish Bapna. But Dan Becker, director of the climate transport campaign at the Center for Biological Diversity, slammed the adjusted rules as "significantly weaker." "The EPA caved to pressure from Big Auto, Big Oil and car dealers and riddled the plan with loopholes big enough to drive a Ford F150 through," Becker said. "The weaker rule means cars and pickups spew more pollution, oil companies keep socking consumers at the pump, and automakers keep wielding well-practiced delay tactics." </document> <category> CC: Criticism of climate policies: Climate policies are ineffective </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Throughout several paragraphs, the text conveys a narrative depicting US climate policies as ineffective, arguing that the industry has the opportunity to reach the targets but that is not enough to have an impact on emission. The article aims to criticise the Biden administration but also highlighting some contradictions within the US economic system

EN_CC_200013.txt

CC: Criticism of climate policies

CC: Criticism of climate policies: Climate policies are ineffective

Within the context of the US, the text criticises climate policies promoted by Joe Biden's administration for being infeffective and weak. According to the text, they would allow car manufacturers to produce polluting vehicles since the regulations are too soft.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Biden Unveils Strict Auto Standards to Speed EV Shift President Joe Biden's administration announced Wednesday revised pollution standards for cars and trucks meant to accelerate the US auto industry's shift to electric to mitigate climate change. The rules set ambitious emission reductions for 2032 but are moderated somewhat compared with preliminary standards unveiled last April. Following carmaker criticism, the final rules give manufacturers greater flexibility and ease the benchmarks in the first three years. Those shifts were criticized as a sop to corporations from at least one environmental group, even as the final rule won praise from other leading NGOs focused on climate change. The final rules -- which were described by administration official as "the strongest ever" and would likely be undone if Republican Donald Trump defeats Biden in November -- still require a nearly 50 percent drop in fleet-wide emissions in 2032 compared with 2026 through increased sales of electric vehicles (EVs) and low-emission autos. The rules, which dovetail with other key Biden programs to build more EV charging stations and manufacturing facilities and incentivize EV sales, establish the environment as a significant point of difference in the 2024 presidential election. Trump has mocked climate change as a problem and cast the transition to EVs as a job-killer that will benefit China at the expense of American workers. Biden argues that US auto builders need to take the lead in the expanding EV market. "I brought together American automakers. I brought together American autoworkers," said Biden in a statement. "Together, we've made historic progress." Alluding to his target set three years ago that 50 percent of new vehicles in 2030 would be EVs, Biden predicted we'll meet my goal for 2030 and race forward in the years ahead." - Industry given more time - EVs accounted for 7.6 percent in 2023 sales, up from 5.9 percent in 2022, according to Cox Automotive. The original proposal had envisioned the EV share surging to as much as 67 percent of new vehicle sales by 2032. Carmakers, which are midway through sweeping, multi-billion-dollar investments to build more EV capacity, criticized the initial standards as overly-stringent. They cited the limited state of charging capacity in the United States that has dampened consumer demand, as well as difficulties in supply of metals and other raw materials for EV batteries. Following input from the auto industry, organized labor and auto dealerships, Biden administration officials decided to allow manufacturers a "variety of pathways" to reaching the standard, a senior Biden administration official said Tuesday. This path could include a mix of EVs, conventional but more fuel-efficient engines, and plug-in hybrid vehicles, which have seen a rise in demand of late. Biden administration officials opted to soften year-to-year emissions improvements in the 2027-2030 period, while maintaining the same target in 2032. Moderating the targets in these first three years "was the right call," said John Bozzella, president of the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, a Washington lobby representing carmakers. "These adjusted EV targets -– still a stretch goal –- should give the market and supply chains a chance to catch up," said Bozzella, adding that the extra time will allow more EV charging stations to come on-line. - Too many 'loopholes'? - The final standards set a fleet-wide target of 85 grams of carbon dioxide in 2032, down from 170 in 2027, according to an administration fact sheet. Wednesday's initiative won praise from leading environmental groups including the Sierra Club and NRDC, which said the new rules "take us in the right direction," according to a statement from NRDC chief Manish Bapna. But Dan Becker, director of the climate transport campaign at the Center for Biological Diversity, slammed the adjusted rules as "significantly weaker." "The EPA caved to pressure from Big Auto, Big Oil and car dealers and riddled the plan with loopholes big enough to drive a Ford F150 through," Becker said. "The weaker rule means cars and pickups spew more pollution, oil companies keep socking consumers at the pump, and automakers keep wielding well-practiced delay tactics." </document> <category> CC: Criticism of climate policies: Climate policies are ineffective </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text conveys a narrative depicting climate policies as ineffective. Indeed, Biden's climate agenda is criticised for being too weak to face the challenge of climate change and at the same time not being accepted by car companies.

EN_CC_200013.txt

CC: Criticism of climate policies

CC: Criticism of climate policies: Climate policies are ineffective

Within the context of the US, the text criticises climate policies promoted by Joe Biden's administration for being infeffective and weak. According to the text, they would allow car manufacturers to produce polluting vehicles since the regulations are too soft.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Biden Unveils Strict Auto Standards to Speed EV Shift President Joe Biden's administration announced Wednesday revised pollution standards for cars and trucks meant to accelerate the US auto industry's shift to electric to mitigate climate change. The rules set ambitious emission reductions for 2032 but are moderated somewhat compared with preliminary standards unveiled last April. Following carmaker criticism, the final rules give manufacturers greater flexibility and ease the benchmarks in the first three years. Those shifts were criticized as a sop to corporations from at least one environmental group, even as the final rule won praise from other leading NGOs focused on climate change. The final rules -- which were described by administration official as "the strongest ever" and would likely be undone if Republican Donald Trump defeats Biden in November -- still require a nearly 50 percent drop in fleet-wide emissions in 2032 compared with 2026 through increased sales of electric vehicles (EVs) and low-emission autos. The rules, which dovetail with other key Biden programs to build more EV charging stations and manufacturing facilities and incentivize EV sales, establish the environment as a significant point of difference in the 2024 presidential election. Trump has mocked climate change as a problem and cast the transition to EVs as a job-killer that will benefit China at the expense of American workers. Biden argues that US auto builders need to take the lead in the expanding EV market. "I brought together American automakers. I brought together American autoworkers," said Biden in a statement. "Together, we've made historic progress." Alluding to his target set three years ago that 50 percent of new vehicles in 2030 would be EVs, Biden predicted we'll meet my goal for 2030 and race forward in the years ahead." - Industry given more time - EVs accounted for 7.6 percent in 2023 sales, up from 5.9 percent in 2022, according to Cox Automotive. The original proposal had envisioned the EV share surging to as much as 67 percent of new vehicle sales by 2032. Carmakers, which are midway through sweeping, multi-billion-dollar investments to build more EV capacity, criticized the initial standards as overly-stringent. They cited the limited state of charging capacity in the United States that has dampened consumer demand, as well as difficulties in supply of metals and other raw materials for EV batteries. Following input from the auto industry, organized labor and auto dealerships, Biden administration officials decided to allow manufacturers a "variety of pathways" to reaching the standard, a senior Biden administration official said Tuesday. This path could include a mix of EVs, conventional but more fuel-efficient engines, and plug-in hybrid vehicles, which have seen a rise in demand of late. Biden administration officials opted to soften year-to-year emissions improvements in the 2027-2030 period, while maintaining the same target in 2032. Moderating the targets in these first three years "was the right call," said John Bozzella, president of the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, a Washington lobby representing carmakers. "These adjusted EV targets -– still a stretch goal –- should give the market and supply chains a chance to catch up," said Bozzella, adding that the extra time will allow more EV charging stations to come on-line. - Too many 'loopholes'? - The final standards set a fleet-wide target of 85 grams of carbon dioxide in 2032, down from 170 in 2027, according to an administration fact sheet. Wednesday's initiative won praise from leading environmental groups including the Sierra Club and NRDC, which said the new rules "take us in the right direction," according to a statement from NRDC chief Manish Bapna. But Dan Becker, director of the climate transport campaign at the Center for Biological Diversity, slammed the adjusted rules as "significantly weaker." "The EPA caved to pressure from Big Auto, Big Oil and car dealers and riddled the plan with loopholes big enough to drive a Ford F150 through," Becker said. "The weaker rule means cars and pickups spew more pollution, oil companies keep socking consumers at the pump, and automakers keep wielding well-practiced delay tactics." </document> <category> CC: Criticism of climate policies: Climate policies are ineffective </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text argues that the climate policies that have been adopted in the US are ineffective as they lack strengh

EN_CC_200013.txt

CC: Criticism of climate policies

CC: Criticism of climate policies: Climate policies are ineffective

Within the context of the US, the text criticises climate policies promoted by Joe Biden's administration for being infeffective and weak. According to the text, they would allow car manufacturers to produce polluting vehicles since the regulations are too soft.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> 'Entirely Fictional, Shameless': Top Mosquito Expert Blasts Dame Jenny Harries’s Claim That Climate Change Will Make Dengue Fever Common in U.K. Within 20 Years. The lies to generate fear and justify dystopia are absolutely shocking A top mosquito expert has blasted Professor Dame Jenny Harries’s claim that climate change will make dengue fever and other mosquito-borne diseases common in the U.K. within 20 years, branding it “entirely fictional” and “shameless”. Professor Harries, who heads the U.K. Health Security Agency (UKHSA), recently said that rising temperatures will make such diseases common in the U.K. by 2040 because the Asian Tiger Mosquito – which can transmit dengue, chikungunya, zika, yellow fever and other viral diseases – will become established throughout Britain. Dengue will become endemic in London, she claimed. But Professor Paul Reiter, retired Professor of Insects and Infectious Diseases at the Pasteur Institute in Paris, and a leading expert in mosquito-borne diseases, has ridiculed her claims. He told Net Zero Watch: The natural range of the Tiger mosquito, an Asian species, extends from the tropics to regions where mean January temperatures are around –10°C. Northern strains are able to survive because in late summer, as days grow shorter, the eggs they lay are dormant and remain unhatched until spring arrives. It is true that since the late 1970s, there has been rapid global spread of the Tiger mosquito to the United States, Latin America, Europe and across Africa, probably mainly via the global trade in used tyres. Professor Reiter says that it is beyond doubt that this has nothing at all to do with temperature. Professor Reiter has also lambasted fearmongering about the return of malaria, noting that this was once a major cause of death in many parts of England, even during the Little Ice Age from the 1300s to the 1800s, and its disappearance was, once again, nothing to do with temperature: Shakespeare mentions malaria – “the ague” – 13 times, so it was clearly once common here. The disease began to decline – for a multitude of reasons – in the mid-19th century, despite the upward trend in global temperatures. Net Zero Watch Director Andrew Montford said: This is not the first time we have seen the Civil Service misleading the public in this way. Science is being misused to generate fear and to ‘nudge’ us in a desired direction. This kind of shameful disinformation brings the Civil Service into disrepute. But it seems our public officials won’t miss an opportunity to bang the climate alarmist drum as they attempt to cajole and coerce the public into accepting radical cuts in living standards to ward off threats based solely on the perennially wrong outputs of biased computer models. Read More: “Entirely Fictional, Shameless”: Top Mosquito Expert Blasts Dame Jenny Harries’s Claim That Climate Change Will Make Dengue Fever Common in U.K. Within 20 Years </document> <category> CC: Questioning the measurements and science: Scientific community is unreliable </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text question the reliability of studies suggesting the return of diseases such as the Dengue in the UK. It accuses the scientific community of alarmism and bad faith.

EN_CC_100123.txt

CC: Questioning the measurements and science

CC: Questioning the measurements and science: Scientific community is unreliable

The text questions the reliability of studies reporting the negative effects of climate change. More specifically, they criticise a study claiming that diseases such as the Dengue will return to the UK as based on no evidence and being alarmist.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> 'Entirely Fictional, Shameless': Top Mosquito Expert Blasts Dame Jenny Harries’s Claim That Climate Change Will Make Dengue Fever Common in U.K. Within 20 Years. The lies to generate fear and justify dystopia are absolutely shocking A top mosquito expert has blasted Professor Dame Jenny Harries’s claim that climate change will make dengue fever and other mosquito-borne diseases common in the U.K. within 20 years, branding it “entirely fictional” and “shameless”. Professor Harries, who heads the U.K. Health Security Agency (UKHSA), recently said that rising temperatures will make such diseases common in the U.K. by 2040 because the Asian Tiger Mosquito – which can transmit dengue, chikungunya, zika, yellow fever and other viral diseases – will become established throughout Britain. Dengue will become endemic in London, she claimed. But Professor Paul Reiter, retired Professor of Insects and Infectious Diseases at the Pasteur Institute in Paris, and a leading expert in mosquito-borne diseases, has ridiculed her claims. He told Net Zero Watch: The natural range of the Tiger mosquito, an Asian species, extends from the tropics to regions where mean January temperatures are around –10°C. Northern strains are able to survive because in late summer, as days grow shorter, the eggs they lay are dormant and remain unhatched until spring arrives. It is true that since the late 1970s, there has been rapid global spread of the Tiger mosquito to the United States, Latin America, Europe and across Africa, probably mainly via the global trade in used tyres. Professor Reiter says that it is beyond doubt that this has nothing at all to do with temperature. Professor Reiter has also lambasted fearmongering about the return of malaria, noting that this was once a major cause of death in many parts of England, even during the Little Ice Age from the 1300s to the 1800s, and its disappearance was, once again, nothing to do with temperature: Shakespeare mentions malaria – “the ague” – 13 times, so it was clearly once common here. The disease began to decline – for a multitude of reasons – in the mid-19th century, despite the upward trend in global temperatures. Net Zero Watch Director Andrew Montford said: This is not the first time we have seen the Civil Service misleading the public in this way. Science is being misused to generate fear and to ‘nudge’ us in a desired direction. This kind of shameful disinformation brings the Civil Service into disrepute. But it seems our public officials won’t miss an opportunity to bang the climate alarmist drum as they attempt to cajole and coerce the public into accepting radical cuts in living standards to ward off threats based solely on the perennially wrong outputs of biased computer models. Read More: “Entirely Fictional, Shameless”: Top Mosquito Expert Blasts Dame Jenny Harries’s Claim That Climate Change Will Make Dengue Fever Common in U.K. Within 20 Years </document> <category> CC: Questioning the measurements and science: Scientific community is unreliable </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text presents several quotes criticising UK's Chief Medical Officer and other public officials for allegedly misleading the public by claiming that climate change will make certain diseases like the Dengue or Malaria return to the UK.

EN_CC_100123.txt

CC: Questioning the measurements and science

CC: Questioning the measurements and science: Scientific community is unreliable

The text questions the reliability of studies reporting the negative effects of climate change. More specifically, they criticise a study claiming that diseases such as the Dengue will return to the UK as based on no evidence and being alarmist.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> 'Entirely Fictional, Shameless': Top Mosquito Expert Blasts Dame Jenny Harries’s Claim That Climate Change Will Make Dengue Fever Common in U.K. Within 20 Years. The lies to generate fear and justify dystopia are absolutely shocking A top mosquito expert has blasted Professor Dame Jenny Harries’s claim that climate change will make dengue fever and other mosquito-borne diseases common in the U.K. within 20 years, branding it “entirely fictional” and “shameless”. Professor Harries, who heads the U.K. Health Security Agency (UKHSA), recently said that rising temperatures will make such diseases common in the U.K. by 2040 because the Asian Tiger Mosquito – which can transmit dengue, chikungunya, zika, yellow fever and other viral diseases – will become established throughout Britain. Dengue will become endemic in London, she claimed. But Professor Paul Reiter, retired Professor of Insects and Infectious Diseases at the Pasteur Institute in Paris, and a leading expert in mosquito-borne diseases, has ridiculed her claims. He told Net Zero Watch: The natural range of the Tiger mosquito, an Asian species, extends from the tropics to regions where mean January temperatures are around –10°C. Northern strains are able to survive because in late summer, as days grow shorter, the eggs they lay are dormant and remain unhatched until spring arrives. It is true that since the late 1970s, there has been rapid global spread of the Tiger mosquito to the United States, Latin America, Europe and across Africa, probably mainly via the global trade in used tyres. Professor Reiter says that it is beyond doubt that this has nothing at all to do with temperature. Professor Reiter has also lambasted fearmongering about the return of malaria, noting that this was once a major cause of death in many parts of England, even during the Little Ice Age from the 1300s to the 1800s, and its disappearance was, once again, nothing to do with temperature: Shakespeare mentions malaria – “the ague” – 13 times, so it was clearly once common here. The disease began to decline – for a multitude of reasons – in the mid-19th century, despite the upward trend in global temperatures. Net Zero Watch Director Andrew Montford said: This is not the first time we have seen the Civil Service misleading the public in this way. Science is being misused to generate fear and to ‘nudge’ us in a desired direction. This kind of shameful disinformation brings the Civil Service into disrepute. But it seems our public officials won’t miss an opportunity to bang the climate alarmist drum as they attempt to cajole and coerce the public into accepting radical cuts in living standards to ward off threats based solely on the perennially wrong outputs of biased computer models. Read More: “Entirely Fictional, Shameless”: Top Mosquito Expert Blasts Dame Jenny Harries’s Claim That Climate Change Will Make Dengue Fever Common in U.K. Within 20 Years </document> <category> CC: Questioning the measurements and science: Scientific community is unreliable </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The author criticise climate movement in the context of UK public health. Climate movement is accused of alarmist propaganda aiming to generate fear among UK public in order to support government policies

EN_CC_100123.txt

CC: Questioning the measurements and science

CC: Questioning the measurements and science: Scientific community is unreliable

The text questions the reliability of studies reporting the negative effects of climate change. More specifically, they criticise a study claiming that diseases such as the Dengue will return to the UK as based on no evidence and being alarmist.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> 'Entirely Fictional, Shameless': Top Mosquito Expert Blasts Dame Jenny Harries’s Claim That Climate Change Will Make Dengue Fever Common in U.K. Within 20 Years. The lies to generate fear and justify dystopia are absolutely shocking A top mosquito expert has blasted Professor Dame Jenny Harries’s claim that climate change will make dengue fever and other mosquito-borne diseases common in the U.K. within 20 years, branding it “entirely fictional” and “shameless”. Professor Harries, who heads the U.K. Health Security Agency (UKHSA), recently said that rising temperatures will make such diseases common in the U.K. by 2040 because the Asian Tiger Mosquito – which can transmit dengue, chikungunya, zika, yellow fever and other viral diseases – will become established throughout Britain. Dengue will become endemic in London, she claimed. But Professor Paul Reiter, retired Professor of Insects and Infectious Diseases at the Pasteur Institute in Paris, and a leading expert in mosquito-borne diseases, has ridiculed her claims. He told Net Zero Watch: The natural range of the Tiger mosquito, an Asian species, extends from the tropics to regions where mean January temperatures are around –10°C. Northern strains are able to survive because in late summer, as days grow shorter, the eggs they lay are dormant and remain unhatched until spring arrives. It is true that since the late 1970s, there has been rapid global spread of the Tiger mosquito to the United States, Latin America, Europe and across Africa, probably mainly via the global trade in used tyres. Professor Reiter says that it is beyond doubt that this has nothing at all to do with temperature. Professor Reiter has also lambasted fearmongering about the return of malaria, noting that this was once a major cause of death in many parts of England, even during the Little Ice Age from the 1300s to the 1800s, and its disappearance was, once again, nothing to do with temperature: Shakespeare mentions malaria – “the ague” – 13 times, so it was clearly once common here. The disease began to decline – for a multitude of reasons – in the mid-19th century, despite the upward trend in global temperatures. Net Zero Watch Director Andrew Montford said: This is not the first time we have seen the Civil Service misleading the public in this way. Science is being misused to generate fear and to ‘nudge’ us in a desired direction. This kind of shameful disinformation brings the Civil Service into disrepute. But it seems our public officials won’t miss an opportunity to bang the climate alarmist drum as they attempt to cajole and coerce the public into accepting radical cuts in living standards to ward off threats based solely on the perennially wrong outputs of biased computer models. Read More: “Entirely Fictional, Shameless”: Top Mosquito Expert Blasts Dame Jenny Harries’s Claim That Climate Change Will Make Dengue Fever Common in U.K. Within 20 Years </document> <category> CC: Questioning the measurements and science: Scientific community is unreliable </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Several paragraphs question the reliability of scientific studies indicating negative consequences of climate change. They accuse scientists of alarmism, alarmist claims being groundless and having no scientific basis.

EN_CC_100123.txt

CC: Questioning the measurements and science

CC: Questioning the measurements and science: Scientific community is unreliable

The text questions the reliability of studies reporting the negative effects of climate change. More specifically, they criticise a study claiming that diseases such as the Dengue will return to the UK as based on no evidence and being alarmist.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> 'Entirely Fictional, Shameless': Top Mosquito Expert Blasts Dame Jenny Harries’s Claim That Climate Change Will Make Dengue Fever Common in U.K. Within 20 Years. The lies to generate fear and justify dystopia are absolutely shocking A top mosquito expert has blasted Professor Dame Jenny Harries’s claim that climate change will make dengue fever and other mosquito-borne diseases common in the U.K. within 20 years, branding it “entirely fictional” and “shameless”. Professor Harries, who heads the U.K. Health Security Agency (UKHSA), recently said that rising temperatures will make such diseases common in the U.K. by 2040 because the Asian Tiger Mosquito – which can transmit dengue, chikungunya, zika, yellow fever and other viral diseases – will become established throughout Britain. Dengue will become endemic in London, she claimed. But Professor Paul Reiter, retired Professor of Insects and Infectious Diseases at the Pasteur Institute in Paris, and a leading expert in mosquito-borne diseases, has ridiculed her claims. He told Net Zero Watch: The natural range of the Tiger mosquito, an Asian species, extends from the tropics to regions where mean January temperatures are around –10°C. Northern strains are able to survive because in late summer, as days grow shorter, the eggs they lay are dormant and remain unhatched until spring arrives. It is true that since the late 1970s, there has been rapid global spread of the Tiger mosquito to the United States, Latin America, Europe and across Africa, probably mainly via the global trade in used tyres. Professor Reiter says that it is beyond doubt that this has nothing at all to do with temperature. Professor Reiter has also lambasted fearmongering about the return of malaria, noting that this was once a major cause of death in many parts of England, even during the Little Ice Age from the 1300s to the 1800s, and its disappearance was, once again, nothing to do with temperature: Shakespeare mentions malaria – “the ague” – 13 times, so it was clearly once common here. The disease began to decline – for a multitude of reasons – in the mid-19th century, despite the upward trend in global temperatures. Net Zero Watch Director Andrew Montford said: This is not the first time we have seen the Civil Service misleading the public in this way. Science is being misused to generate fear and to ‘nudge’ us in a desired direction. This kind of shameful disinformation brings the Civil Service into disrepute. But it seems our public officials won’t miss an opportunity to bang the climate alarmist drum as they attempt to cajole and coerce the public into accepting radical cuts in living standards to ward off threats based solely on the perennially wrong outputs of biased computer models. Read More: “Entirely Fictional, Shameless”: Top Mosquito Expert Blasts Dame Jenny Harries’s Claim That Climate Change Will Make Dengue Fever Common in U.K. Within 20 Years </document> <category> CC: Questioning the measurements and science: Scientific community is unreliable </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The article criticises an UK public health official, saying she is misleading the public by claiming that diseases such as Dengue will return to the UK within 20 years due to climate change. The author argue that such claims are "shameless" and alarmist.

EN_CC_100123.txt

CC: Questioning the measurements and science

CC: Questioning the measurements and science: Scientific community is unreliable

The text questions the reliability of studies reporting the negative effects of climate change. More specifically, they criticise a study claiming that diseases such as the Dengue will return to the UK as based on no evidence and being alarmist.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> ‘This Is A F**king War’: Jamie Dimon Slams Biden For Begging Saudis For Oil Three days after Jamie Dimon sparked a marketwide selloff that sent stocks to fresh 2022 lows after he predicted a US recession in “6 to 9” months citing drivers including rising interest rates, persistent inflation, and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and warned stocks could drop another 20%, the JPMorgan CEO who is expected to report earnings tomorrow (and hopefully clarify why his bank refuses to move its deposit rate above 0.01% in the process keeping $2.2 trillion in liquidity locked inside the overnight funding facility), doubled down today saying the Fed can’t cool the red-hot economy without bringing on a recession. [bold, links added] …snip… In separate – and far more provocative -comments made earlier in the day during a JPMorgan investor seminar where he led a fireside chat moderated by JPMorgan’s Gergana Thiel, Dimon made some extremely outspoken comments that you won’t hear on the mainstream media, telling a small group of listeners that was closed to the press that the “President of the United States needs to stand up and say we may not meet our 2050 climate objectives because this is a fucking war.” He also said, “time to stop going hat in hand to Venezuela and Saudi and start pumping more oil & gas in the USA.” Echoing what he has said before, Jamie said this is the way the USA maintains its standing, as the future of the world is by pumping more oil and gas and using energy security to ensure Western unity. And he did say when it comes to ESG that “investors don’t give a shit” warning not to “cede governance to do-gooder kids on a committee.” Finally, he stressed the need for strong American leadership that is not being provided by either party. His conclusion: the world needs American diplomacy and neither Trump nor Biden can lead the USA. h/t Rúnar O. Read rest at ZeroHedge Join our list Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox. Fundamentally, Mr. Dimon is right. Fossil fuels provide 80% of our domestic primary energy with an ongoing evolution that has taken about 120 years to build our modern, reliable & affordable domestic energy system. The “energy transition” will not be accelerated by government mandate or fiat. It will be dictated by the laws of physics and the energy imperatives of cost, energy/power density, scale & sustainability. So, Joe Biden can madate we will “openly defy gravity by 2050.” That does not mean we can IMPLEMENT it! We’d better get a fully informed, rational and civilzed debate on energy & attendant environmental policy started soon. Otherwise, the average Americans standard of living will continue to head south. Just ask anyone in the EU how the “Green Dream” is working out. With the current policy course, the U.S is only 2-3 years behind the same DISASTOROUS result… Jamie Dimon speaks the truth and the Democrats don’t like that. Lower energy costs would lower inflation, but that would require new refineries and some backing from Washington that gives the explorers and drillers confidence. ESG is a money loser. Avoid any entity that promotes it. We wouldn’t have to pay higher prices to gas up our cars and lawnmowers if Biden the Bumbler Had’d canceled the Keystone Pipeline and the ANWR to appease the Eco-Freaks and the Russians/OPEC </document> <category> CC: Criticism of climate policies: Climate policies have negative impact on the economy </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Multiple passages convey the narrative that climate policies have a negative impact on the economy, pointing out the example of the Biden administration

EN_UA_103025.txt

CC: Criticism of climate policies

CC: Criticism of climate policies: Climate policies have negative impact on the economy

Several paragraphs question climate policies arguing that they will have a detrimental impact on the US economy. As an evidence, the EU green deal is mentioned as not working, as well as criticism is exrpessed towards Biden's administration

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> ‘This Is A F**king War’: Jamie Dimon Slams Biden For Begging Saudis For Oil Three days after Jamie Dimon sparked a marketwide selloff that sent stocks to fresh 2022 lows after he predicted a US recession in “6 to 9” months citing drivers including rising interest rates, persistent inflation, and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and warned stocks could drop another 20%, the JPMorgan CEO who is expected to report earnings tomorrow (and hopefully clarify why his bank refuses to move its deposit rate above 0.01% in the process keeping $2.2 trillion in liquidity locked inside the overnight funding facility), doubled down today saying the Fed can’t cool the red-hot economy without bringing on a recession. [bold, links added] …snip… In separate – and far more provocative -comments made earlier in the day during a JPMorgan investor seminar where he led a fireside chat moderated by JPMorgan’s Gergana Thiel, Dimon made some extremely outspoken comments that you won’t hear on the mainstream media, telling a small group of listeners that was closed to the press that the “President of the United States needs to stand up and say we may not meet our 2050 climate objectives because this is a fucking war.” He also said, “time to stop going hat in hand to Venezuela and Saudi and start pumping more oil & gas in the USA.” Echoing what he has said before, Jamie said this is the way the USA maintains its standing, as the future of the world is by pumping more oil and gas and using energy security to ensure Western unity. And he did say when it comes to ESG that “investors don’t give a shit” warning not to “cede governance to do-gooder kids on a committee.” Finally, he stressed the need for strong American leadership that is not being provided by either party. His conclusion: the world needs American diplomacy and neither Trump nor Biden can lead the USA. h/t Rúnar O. Read rest at ZeroHedge Join our list Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox. Fundamentally, Mr. Dimon is right. Fossil fuels provide 80% of our domestic primary energy with an ongoing evolution that has taken about 120 years to build our modern, reliable & affordable domestic energy system. The “energy transition” will not be accelerated by government mandate or fiat. It will be dictated by the laws of physics and the energy imperatives of cost, energy/power density, scale & sustainability. So, Joe Biden can madate we will “openly defy gravity by 2050.” That does not mean we can IMPLEMENT it! We’d better get a fully informed, rational and civilzed debate on energy & attendant environmental policy started soon. Otherwise, the average Americans standard of living will continue to head south. Just ask anyone in the EU how the “Green Dream” is working out. With the current policy course, the U.S is only 2-3 years behind the same DISASTOROUS result… Jamie Dimon speaks the truth and the Democrats don’t like that. Lower energy costs would lower inflation, but that would require new refineries and some backing from Washington that gives the explorers and drillers confidence. ESG is a money loser. Avoid any entity that promotes it. We wouldn’t have to pay higher prices to gas up our cars and lawnmowers if Biden the Bumbler Had’d canceled the Keystone Pipeline and the ANWR to appease the Eco-Freaks and the Russians/OPEC </document> <category> CC: Criticism of climate policies: Climate policies have negative impact on the economy </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Several paragraphs depict climate related policies as harmful for the US economy since it would reduce the supply of fossil fuels as well as hindering economic activities.

EN_UA_103025.txt

CC: Criticism of climate policies

CC: Criticism of climate policies: Climate policies have negative impact on the economy

Several paragraphs question climate policies arguing that they will have a detrimental impact on the US economy. As an evidence, the EU green deal is mentioned as not working, as well as criticism is exrpessed towards Biden's administration

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> ‘This Is A F**king War’: Jamie Dimon Slams Biden For Begging Saudis For Oil Three days after Jamie Dimon sparked a marketwide selloff that sent stocks to fresh 2022 lows after he predicted a US recession in “6 to 9” months citing drivers including rising interest rates, persistent inflation, and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and warned stocks could drop another 20%, the JPMorgan CEO who is expected to report earnings tomorrow (and hopefully clarify why his bank refuses to move its deposit rate above 0.01% in the process keeping $2.2 trillion in liquidity locked inside the overnight funding facility), doubled down today saying the Fed can’t cool the red-hot economy without bringing on a recession. [bold, links added] …snip… In separate – and far more provocative -comments made earlier in the day during a JPMorgan investor seminar where he led a fireside chat moderated by JPMorgan’s Gergana Thiel, Dimon made some extremely outspoken comments that you won’t hear on the mainstream media, telling a small group of listeners that was closed to the press that the “President of the United States needs to stand up and say we may not meet our 2050 climate objectives because this is a fucking war.” He also said, “time to stop going hat in hand to Venezuela and Saudi and start pumping more oil & gas in the USA.” Echoing what he has said before, Jamie said this is the way the USA maintains its standing, as the future of the world is by pumping more oil and gas and using energy security to ensure Western unity. And he did say when it comes to ESG that “investors don’t give a shit” warning not to “cede governance to do-gooder kids on a committee.” Finally, he stressed the need for strong American leadership that is not being provided by either party. His conclusion: the world needs American diplomacy and neither Trump nor Biden can lead the USA. h/t Rúnar O. Read rest at ZeroHedge Join our list Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox. Fundamentally, Mr. Dimon is right. Fossil fuels provide 80% of our domestic primary energy with an ongoing evolution that has taken about 120 years to build our modern, reliable & affordable domestic energy system. The “energy transition” will not be accelerated by government mandate or fiat. It will be dictated by the laws of physics and the energy imperatives of cost, energy/power density, scale & sustainability. So, Joe Biden can madate we will “openly defy gravity by 2050.” That does not mean we can IMPLEMENT it! We’d better get a fully informed, rational and civilzed debate on energy & attendant environmental policy started soon. Otherwise, the average Americans standard of living will continue to head south. Just ask anyone in the EU how the “Green Dream” is working out. With the current policy course, the U.S is only 2-3 years behind the same DISASTOROUS result… Jamie Dimon speaks the truth and the Democrats don’t like that. Lower energy costs would lower inflation, but that would require new refineries and some backing from Washington that gives the explorers and drillers confidence. ESG is a money loser. Avoid any entity that promotes it. We wouldn’t have to pay higher prices to gas up our cars and lawnmowers if Biden the Bumbler Had’d canceled the Keystone Pipeline and the ANWR to appease the Eco-Freaks and the Russians/OPEC </document> <category> CC: Criticism of climate policies: Climate policies have negative impact on the economy </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text has a couple of paragraphs in which climate policies are accused of having a negative impact on the economy, notably pointing out the US experience

EN_UA_103025.txt

CC: Criticism of climate policies

CC: Criticism of climate policies: Climate policies have negative impact on the economy

Several paragraphs question climate policies arguing that they will have a detrimental impact on the US economy. As an evidence, the EU green deal is mentioned as not working, as well as criticism is exrpessed towards Biden's administration

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> ‘This Is A F**king War’: Jamie Dimon Slams Biden For Begging Saudis For Oil Three days after Jamie Dimon sparked a marketwide selloff that sent stocks to fresh 2022 lows after he predicted a US recession in “6 to 9” months citing drivers including rising interest rates, persistent inflation, and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and warned stocks could drop another 20%, the JPMorgan CEO who is expected to report earnings tomorrow (and hopefully clarify why his bank refuses to move its deposit rate above 0.01% in the process keeping $2.2 trillion in liquidity locked inside the overnight funding facility), doubled down today saying the Fed can’t cool the red-hot economy without bringing on a recession. [bold, links added] …snip… In separate – and far more provocative -comments made earlier in the day during a JPMorgan investor seminar where he led a fireside chat moderated by JPMorgan’s Gergana Thiel, Dimon made some extremely outspoken comments that you won’t hear on the mainstream media, telling a small group of listeners that was closed to the press that the “President of the United States needs to stand up and say we may not meet our 2050 climate objectives because this is a fucking war.” He also said, “time to stop going hat in hand to Venezuela and Saudi and start pumping more oil & gas in the USA.” Echoing what he has said before, Jamie said this is the way the USA maintains its standing, as the future of the world is by pumping more oil and gas and using energy security to ensure Western unity. And he did say when it comes to ESG that “investors don’t give a shit” warning not to “cede governance to do-gooder kids on a committee.” Finally, he stressed the need for strong American leadership that is not being provided by either party. His conclusion: the world needs American diplomacy and neither Trump nor Biden can lead the USA. h/t Rúnar O. Read rest at ZeroHedge Join our list Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox. Fundamentally, Mr. Dimon is right. Fossil fuels provide 80% of our domestic primary energy with an ongoing evolution that has taken about 120 years to build our modern, reliable & affordable domestic energy system. The “energy transition” will not be accelerated by government mandate or fiat. It will be dictated by the laws of physics and the energy imperatives of cost, energy/power density, scale & sustainability. So, Joe Biden can madate we will “openly defy gravity by 2050.” That does not mean we can IMPLEMENT it! We’d better get a fully informed, rational and civilzed debate on energy & attendant environmental policy started soon. Otherwise, the average Americans standard of living will continue to head south. Just ask anyone in the EU how the “Green Dream” is working out. With the current policy course, the U.S is only 2-3 years behind the same DISASTOROUS result… Jamie Dimon speaks the truth and the Democrats don’t like that. Lower energy costs would lower inflation, but that would require new refineries and some backing from Washington that gives the explorers and drillers confidence. ESG is a money loser. Avoid any entity that promotes it. We wouldn’t have to pay higher prices to gas up our cars and lawnmowers if Biden the Bumbler Had’d canceled the Keystone Pipeline and the ANWR to appease the Eco-Freaks and the Russians/OPEC </document> <category> CC: Criticism of climate policies: Climate policies have negative impact on the economy </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Several paragraphs depict climate policies as having a negative impact on the US economy

EN_UA_103025.txt

CC: Criticism of climate policies

CC: Criticism of climate policies: Climate policies have negative impact on the economy

Several paragraphs question climate policies arguing that they will have a detrimental impact on the US economy. As an evidence, the EU green deal is mentioned as not working, as well as criticism is exrpessed towards Biden's administration

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> ‘This Is A F**king War’: Jamie Dimon Slams Biden For Begging Saudis For Oil Three days after Jamie Dimon sparked a marketwide selloff that sent stocks to fresh 2022 lows after he predicted a US recession in “6 to 9” months citing drivers including rising interest rates, persistent inflation, and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and warned stocks could drop another 20%, the JPMorgan CEO who is expected to report earnings tomorrow (and hopefully clarify why his bank refuses to move its deposit rate above 0.01% in the process keeping $2.2 trillion in liquidity locked inside the overnight funding facility), doubled down today saying the Fed can’t cool the red-hot economy without bringing on a recession. [bold, links added] …snip… In separate – and far more provocative -comments made earlier in the day during a JPMorgan investor seminar where he led a fireside chat moderated by JPMorgan’s Gergana Thiel, Dimon made some extremely outspoken comments that you won’t hear on the mainstream media, telling a small group of listeners that was closed to the press that the “President of the United States needs to stand up and say we may not meet our 2050 climate objectives because this is a fucking war.” He also said, “time to stop going hat in hand to Venezuela and Saudi and start pumping more oil & gas in the USA.” Echoing what he has said before, Jamie said this is the way the USA maintains its standing, as the future of the world is by pumping more oil and gas and using energy security to ensure Western unity. And he did say when it comes to ESG that “investors don’t give a shit” warning not to “cede governance to do-gooder kids on a committee.” Finally, he stressed the need for strong American leadership that is not being provided by either party. His conclusion: the world needs American diplomacy and neither Trump nor Biden can lead the USA. h/t Rúnar O. Read rest at ZeroHedge Join our list Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox. Fundamentally, Mr. Dimon is right. Fossil fuels provide 80% of our domestic primary energy with an ongoing evolution that has taken about 120 years to build our modern, reliable & affordable domestic energy system. The “energy transition” will not be accelerated by government mandate or fiat. It will be dictated by the laws of physics and the energy imperatives of cost, energy/power density, scale & sustainability. So, Joe Biden can madate we will “openly defy gravity by 2050.” That does not mean we can IMPLEMENT it! We’d better get a fully informed, rational and civilzed debate on energy & attendant environmental policy started soon. Otherwise, the average Americans standard of living will continue to head south. Just ask anyone in the EU how the “Green Dream” is working out. With the current policy course, the U.S is only 2-3 years behind the same DISASTOROUS result… Jamie Dimon speaks the truth and the Democrats don’t like that. Lower energy costs would lower inflation, but that would require new refineries and some backing from Washington that gives the explorers and drillers confidence. ESG is a money loser. Avoid any entity that promotes it. We wouldn’t have to pay higher prices to gas up our cars and lawnmowers if Biden the Bumbler Had’d canceled the Keystone Pipeline and the ANWR to appease the Eco-Freaks and the Russians/OPEC </document> <category> CC: Criticism of climate policies: Climate policies have negative impact on the economy </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The article talks about climate policies which are imposed by the government to be unrealistic and ineffective. Moreover, it suggests that they will negatively impact the economy since the US needs fossil fuels

EN_UA_103025.txt

CC: Criticism of climate policies

CC: Criticism of climate policies: Climate policies have negative impact on the economy

Several paragraphs question climate policies arguing that they will have a detrimental impact on the US economy. As an evidence, the EU green deal is mentioned as not working, as well as criticism is exrpessed towards Biden's administration