Text
stringlengths
55
1.15k
Label
stringclasses
4 values
Many of the developing market Asia-Pacific countries may be subject to a greater degree of economic, political and social instability than is the case in the United States and Western European countries.
risk
The value of investments held by the Fund may increase or decrease in response to social, economic, political, financial, public health crises or other disruptive events (whether real, expected or perceived) in the U.S. and global markets and include events such as war, natural disasters, epidemics and pandemics, terrorism, conflicts and social unrest.
risk
Local flood protection measures are considered, and the same depth damage functions are used to estimate asset damage and business interruption from inundation River low flow Water scarcity on the power production sector, specifically on thermal and hydro power plants, which rely on large amounts of water.
risk
Securities of companies in the clean energy industry are subject to swift price and supply fluctuations caused by events relating to international politics, the success of project development and tax and other governmental regulatory policies.
risk
Energy companies can be significantly affected by the supply of, and demand for, specific products (e.g., oil and natural gas) and services, exploration and production spending, government subsidization, world events and general economic conditions.
risk
Health care companies may be affected by government regulations and government health care programs, increases or decreases in the cost of medical products and services, changes in patent and intellectual property rights and product liability claims, among other factors.
risk
In addition, seasonal weather conditions, fluctuations in the supply of, and demand for, clean energy products, changes in energy prices, and international political events may cause fluctuations in the performance of clean energy companies and the prices of their securities.
risk
Type Climate Hazards Description Acute Tropical cyclone Tropical cyclones typically cause severe wind and flood damage.
risk
negatively affect supply and demand in a particular industry, competition for resources; adverse labor relations, political or world events, obsolescence of technologies, and increased competition or new product introductions that may affect the profitability or viability of companies in an industry.
risk
The current political climate has intensified concerns about a potential trade war between China and the United States, as each country has recently imposed tariffs on the other country’s products.
risk
Certain Asian countries are vulnerable to a decrease in the price of or global demand for certain commodities, such as oil, natural gas, and coal.
risk
Regulatory changes or interpretations regarding the definitions and/or use of ESG criteria could have a material adverse effect on the fund’s ability to invest in accordance with its investment policies and/or achieve its investment objective, as well as the ability of certain classes of investors to invest in funds following an ESG strategy such as the fund.
risk
Russia’s military invasion of Ukraine, the resulting responses by the United States and other countries, and the potential for wider conflict has increased volatility and uncertainty in the financial markets, specifically on companies in the oil and gas sector, finance and resource extraction.
risk
Chronic refer to longer-term shifts in climate patterns (e.g., sustained higher temperatures) that may cause sea level rise or chronic heat waves.
risk
Health care companies are subject to competitive forces that may result in price discounting, and may be thinly capitalized and susceptible to product obsolescence.
risk
Companies in the real estate industry may also be subject to liabilities under environmental and hazardous waste laws, among others.
risk
Renewable and alternative energy companies can be significantly affected by the following factors: obsolescence of existing technology, short product cycles, legislation resulting in more strict government regulations and enforcement policies, fluctuations in energy prices and supply and demand of alternative energy fuels, energy conservation, the success of exploration projects, the supply of and demand for oil and gas, world events and economic conditions.
risk
In addition, shares of clean energy companies have been significantly more volatile than shares of companies operating in other more established industries and such securities may be subject to sharp price declines due to factors such as events relating to international politics, the success of project development and tax and other governmental regulatory policies.
risk
Although China is obligated to maintain the current capitalist economic and social system of Hong Kong through June 30, 2047, the continuation of economic and social freedoms enjoyed in Hong Kong is dependent on the government of China.
risk
Adverse weather conditions (such as floods or droughts), natural disasters and other factors, such as disease outbreaks, also may adversely affect companies operating in this industry.
risk
Companies in the utilities sector are subject to a variety of factors that may adversely affect their business or operations, including high interest costs associated with capital construction and improvement programs; difficulty in raising adequate capital in periods of high inflation and unsettled capital markets; governmental regulation of rates the issuer can charge to customers; costs associated with compliance with environmental and other regulations; effects of economic slowdowns and surplus capacity; increased competition; and potential losses resulting from a developing deregulatory environment.
risk
Any spread of an infectious illness, public health threat or similar issue could reduce consumer demand or economic output, result in market closures, travel restrictions or quarantines, and generally have a significant impact on the Chinese economy, which in turn could adversely affect the Fund’s investments.
risk
Any public health emergency could reduce consumer demand or economic output, result in market closures, travel restrictions or quarantines, and generally have a significant impact on the Chinese economy, which in turn could adversely affect the Fund’s investments.
risk
This coronavirus has resulted in closing borders, enhanced health screenings, changes to healthcare service preparation and delivery, quarantines, cancellations, disruptions to supply chains and customer activity, as well as general concern and uncertainty.
risk
Companies in this industry may be adversely affected by changes in commercial and consumer demand for their products.
risk
Weak demand for the companies’ products or services or for clean energy products and services in general, may adversely affect the Fund’s performance.
risk
Based on a 1.5-degrees decarbonization pathway, the potential impact of climate transition risk is estimated.
risk
ESG Strategy Risk—Because the Fund’s ESG investment strategy will exclude securities of certain issuers for nonfinancial reasons (i.e., companies that do not demonstrate sustainable ESG characteristics or are involved in certain prohibited activities), the Fund may forgo some market opportunities available to funds that do not use an ESG investment strategy or may be required to sell a security when it might otherwise be disadvantageous to do so.
risk
Investing only in a portfolio of securities of companies with low carbon exposure may affect the Fund’s exposure to certain types of investments, particularly in the energy and transportation sectors or related industries, and may impact the Fund’s relative investment performance, depending on whether such investments are in or out of favor in the market.
risk
The Fund’s results may be lower than other funds that do not seek to invest in companies based on ESG ratings and/or screen out certain companies or industries.
risk
Net zero transition companies risk: Because the Fund will exclude securities of certain issuers for non-financial reasons (i.e., companies that the sub-adviser does not classify as Net Zero Transition Companies and companies involved in certain prohibited activities), the Fund may forgo some market opportunities available to funds that do not pursue a net zero carbon economy investment strategy or may be required to sell a security when it might otherwise be disadvantageous to do so.
risk
The Fund’s ESG investment strategy limits the types and number of investment opportunities available to the Fund and, as a result, the Fund may underperform other funds that do not have an ESG focus.
risk
The Fund’s environmental criteria limit the available investments compared with funds with no such criteria.
risk
The Fund may also underperform other funds that apply different ESG standards.
risk
The Fund’s consideration of ESG factors as part of its investment strategy may limit the types and number of investment opportunities available to the Fund and, as a result, the Fund may underperform other funds that do not consider ESG factors.
risk
The Underlying Index’s ESG methodology, and thus the fund’s investment strategy, limits the types and number of investment opportunities available to the fund and, as a result, the fund may underperform other funds that do not have an ESG focus.
risk
Application of FMR’s ESG ratings process and/or its sustainable investing exclusion criteria may affect the fund’s exposure to certain issuers, sectors, regions, and countries and may affect the fund’s performance depending on whether certain investments are in or out of favor.
risk
The Fund’s ESG investment strategy may result in the Fund investing in securities, industries or sectors that underperform the market as a whole or underperform other funds screened for ESG criteria.
risk
The Fund’s strategy of investing in securities of companies with low carbon exposure limits the type and number of investment opportunities available to the Fund and, as a result, the Fund may underperform other funds that do not seek to minimize carbon exposure.
risk
The Fund’s results may be lower than other funds that do not seek to invest in issuers based on ESG criteria, or that use a different methodology to screen out issuers or evaluate ESG criteria.
risk
The Fund’s ESG investment strategy may result in the Fund investing in securities or industry sectors that underperform the market as a whole or underperform other funds screened for ESG standards.
risk
Additionally, thematic investing involves the risk that the Environmental Impact Themes are out of favor, or that the securities chosen to represent those themes underperform the market as a whole.
risk
5 Prospectus sustainable investing exclusion criteria may affect the fund’s exposure to certain issuers, sectors, regions, and countries and may affect the fund’s performance depending on whether certain investments are in or out of favor.
risk
Additionally, thematic investing involves the risk that the green building theme is out of favor, or that the securities chosen to represent that theme underperform the market as a whole.
risk
The Fund’s investment strategy of investing in green bonds limits the types and number of investment opportunities available to the Fund and, as a result, the Fund may underperform other funds that do not have a green bond focus.
risk
The application of responsible investment criteria may affect the Fund’s exposure to certain sectors or types of investments, and may impact the Fund’s relative investment performance depending on whether such sectors or investments are in or out of favor in the market.
risk
Further, there is a risk that information used by the Index Provider to evaluate ESG factors may not be readily available, complete or accurate, which could negatively impact the Index Provider’s ability to apply its ESG standards when compiling the Underlying Index, and which may negatively impact the Fund’s performance.
risk
ESG investing also carries the risk that a Fund’s investment returns may underperform funds that do not utilize an ESG investment strategy.
risk
The Fund’s results may be lower than other funds that do not consider ESG characteristics or use a different methodology to identify and/or incorporate ESG characteristics.
risk
As a result, the Fund may underperform other funds with similar strategies that do not have an ESG focus.
risk
Investing in a portfolio of securities of companies attempting to reduce their carbon footprint may impact the fund’s relative investment performance depending on whether such investments are in or out of favor in the market.
risk
The Underlying Index’s ESG methodology may result in the fund investing in securities or industry sectors that underperform the market as a whole or underperform other funds screened for ESG standards.
risk
Investments in High Social Impact Investments are not included in an Index, and a Fund’s performance may deviate from the Index it seeks to track as a result.
risk
The Fund’s low carbon exposure investment strategy may result in the Fund investing in securities or industry sectors that underperform the market.
risk
This may cause the Fund to underperform the stock market as a whole or other funds that do not use an ESG investment strategy.
risk
In addition, because the Index selects securities for inclusion based on ESG criteria, the Fund may forgo some market opportunities available to funds that do not use these criteria.
risk
The Underlying Index’s methodology for identifying companies attempting to reduce their carbon footprint limits the types and number of investment opportunities available to the fund and, as a result, the fund may underperform other funds that do not follow a carbon reduction strategy.
risk
The criteria related to the fund’s ESG ratings process and/or adherence to its sustainable investing exclusion criteria may result in the fund forgoing opportunities to buy certain securities when it might otherwise be advantageous to do so, or selling securities for ESG reasons when it might be otherwise disadvantageous for it to do so.
risk
ESG Investing Risk—the Subadviser incorporates ESG criteria into its investment process, which may result in the selection or exclusion of securities of certain issuers for reasons other than financial performance, and carries the risk that the Fund’s investment returns may underperform funds that do not utilize an ESG investment strategy.
risk
It is suitable for Investors who accept that the Sub-fund's commitment to contribute to the environmental and/or social objective and the low sustainability risk may materially impact the Sub-fund's returns.
risk
Because the Fund evaluates ESG factors to assess and exclude certain investments for non-financial reasons, it may forego some market opportunities available to funds that do not use these factors.
risk
The securities of issuers that score favorably under the Fund’s ESG scoring methodology may underperform similar issuers that do not score as well or may underperform the market as a whole.
risk
The Fund’s results may be lower than other funds that do not apply certain exclusionary screens or use different ESG criteria to screen out certain companies or industries.
risk
The Fund’s consideration of ESG factors may result in the Fund investing in securities or industry sectors that underperform the market as a whole, or forgoing opportunities to invest in securities that might otherwise be advantageous to buy.
risk
As a result, the Fund may underperform funds that do not screen or score issuers based on ESG factors or funds that use a different ESG methodology.
risk
The Index’s use of ESG criteria may result in the Fund investing in securities that underperform the market as a whole or underperform other funds screened for ESG criteria.
risk
The Fund’s green bond investment strategy may result in the Fund investing in securities or industry sectors that underperform the market as a whole or underperform other funds with a green bond focus.
risk
The Index excludes companies based on ESG criteria, which in turn limits the number of investment opportunities available to the Fund.
risk
The Adviser carefully selects its third-party ESG data providers, but due to the specialized resources necessary to obtain ESG-related information underlying or related to the ESG data provided by third-party ESG research firms, the Adviser does not undertake to, and does not, independently test or verify the factors used or data provided by such firms, including Sustainalytics and OWL ESG.
risk
The Index Provider carefully selects its third-party ESG data providers, but due to the specialized resources necessary to obtain ESG-related information underlying or related to the ESG data provided by third-party ESG research firms, the Index Provider does not undertake to, and does not, independently test or verify the factors used or data provided by such firms.
risk
Generally, the index provider does not provide any warranty, or accept any liability, with respect to the quality, accuracy or completeness of the Underlying Index or its related data, and does not guarantee that the Underlying Index will be in line with its stated methodology.
risk
Furthermore, data availability and reporting with respect to ESG criteria may not always be available or may become unreliable.
risk
Furthermore, because ESG considerations are still an emerging area of investment focus, data availability and reporting with respect to ESG criteria may not always be available or may become unreliable.
risk
ESG data may be incomplete or erroneous, which could cause the sub-adviser to incorrectly assess a company’s ESG characteristics.
risk
Moreover, because ESG considerations are still an emerging area of investment focus, ESG information and metrics can be difficult to obtain or not able to be obtained.
risk
In making investment decisions, the sub-adviser relies on information and data that could be incomplete or erroneous, which could cause the sub-adviser to incorrectly assess a company’s ESG characteristics.
risk
The evaluation of ESG factors is often subjective and the third-party ESG data providers used by the Fund, currently, Sustainalytics and OWL ESG, may not identify or evaluate every relevant ESG factor with respect to every investment.
risk
The carbon reduction criteria used to score and weight companies in the Underlying Index is based on publicly available information, third-party data sources and/or provided by the companies themselves and such information may be unavailable or unreliable.
risk
The evaluation of ESG factors and implementation of ESG-related investment restrictions (e.g., screens) rely on the availability of timely, complete, and accurate ESG data reported by issuers and/or third-party research providers.
risk
The Carbon Risk Rating used to score and weight companies in the Underlying Index is based on publicly available information, third-party data sources and/or provided by the companies themselves and such information may be unavailable or unreliable.
risk
Further, in selecting Net Zero Transition Companies for inclusion in the Fund’s portfolio, the sub-adviser may rely on information and data related to carbon intensity and carbon emissions provided by a third-party research firm, which could be incomplete or erroneous, which in turn could cause the sub-adviser to assess a company’s net zero carbon economy characteristics incorrectly.
risk
Neither the Fund nor BlackRock make any representation or warranty, express or implied, with respect to the fairness, correctness, accuracy, reasonableness or completeness of such ESG assessment.
risk
The evaluation of ESG factors is often subjective and the third-party ESG data providers used by the Index may not identify or evaluate every relevant ESG factor with respect to every Index constituent.
risk
Furthermore, data availability and reporting with respect to net zero carbon economy criteria may not always be available or may become unreliable.
risk
In evaluating an investment, the investment adviser is dependent upon information and data that may be incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable, which could adversely affect the analysis of the ESG factors relevant to a particular investment.
risk
The successful implementation of the Fund’s strategy is therefore dependent in large part on the ESG factors considered and research methodologies employed by its third-party ESG data providers, as well as the timely availability of accurate information.
risk
The Fund’s screening criteria is measured at the time of investment and is dependent upon information and data that may be incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable.
risk
When conducting the ESG ratings process of an issuer or compiling and maintaining the sustainable investing exclusion list, the Adviser may rely on information or data obtained through voluntary or thirdparty reporting that may be incomplete, inaccurate, or unavailable, which could cause the Adviser to incorrectly assess an issuer’s business practices with respect to ESG or to incorrectly include or exclude an issuer on or from its sustainable investing exclusion list.
risk
Further, in selecting companies for inclusion in the Index, the Index Provider relies on information and ESG performance data from an affiliated research provider, which could be incomplete or erroneous, which in turn could cause the Index Provider to assess a company’s ESG characteristics incorrectly.
risk
In evaluating a security or issuer based on ESG criteria, BlackRock is dependent upon certain information and data from third party providers of ESG research, which may be incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable.
risk
When evaluating an issuer, the Adviser is dependent on information or data obtained through voluntary or thirdparty reporting that may be incomplete, inaccurate, or unavailable, which could cause the Adviser to incorrectly assess an issuer’s business practices.
risk
Additionally, when conducting the rating process for an issuer, the Adviser may rely on information or data obtained through voluntary or third-party reporting that may be incomplete, inaccurate, or unavailable, which could cause the Adviser to incorrectly assess a company’s business practices with respect to the climate.
risk
In evaluating a company, the Subadviser is dependent upon information and data obtained through voluntary or third-party reporting that may be incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable, which could cause the Subadviser to incorrectly assess a company’s ESG practices.
risk
BlackRock is dependent upon certain information and data from third party providers of ESG research, which may be incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable.
risk
reporting that may be incomplete, inaccurate, or unavailable, which could cause the Adviser to incorrectly assess an issuer’s business practices with respect to ESG or to incorrectly include or exclude an issuer on or from its sustainable investing exclusion list.
risk
There may be limitations with respect to availability of ESG data in certain sectors, as well as limited availability of investments with positive ESG assessments in certain sectors.
risk
The Fund relies on various service providers, including the investment adviser, in its operations and is susceptible to operational, information security and related events (such as public health crises, cyber or hacking attacks) that may affect the service providers or the services that they provide to the Fund.
risk
The criteria used to calculate a company’s greenhouse gas emissions may not properly measure a company’s carbon footprint.
risk
Robeco currently relies on third-party data, including data in relation to companies that do not disclose on the EU Taxonomy alignment of their activities.
risk
PROSPECTUS ROBECO CAPITAL GROWTH FUNDS currently relies on third-party data, including data in relation to companies that do not disclose on the EU Taxonomy alignment of their activities.
risk