How to add a pipeline to 🤗 Transformers?¶
First and foremost, you need to decide the raw entries the pipeline will be able to take. It can be strings, raw bytes,
dictionnaries or whatever seems to be the most likely desired input. Try to keep these inputs as pure Python as
possible as it makes compatibility easier (even through other languages via JSON). Those will be the inputs
of
the pipeline (preprocess
).
Then define the outputs
. Same policy as the inputs
. The simpler, the better. Those will be the outputs of
postprocess
method.
Start by inheriting the base class Pipeline
. with the 4 methods needed to implement preprocess
,
_forward
, postprocess
and _sanitize_parameters
.
from transformers import Pipeline
class MyPipeline(Pipeline):
def _sanitize_parameters(self, **kwargs)
preprocess_kwargs = {}
if "maybe_arg" in kwargs:
preprocess_kwargs["maybe_arg"] = kwargs["maybe_arg"]
return preprocess_kwargs, {}, {}
def preprocess(self, inputs, maybe_arg=2)
model_input = Tensor(....)
return {"model_input": model_input}
def _forward(self, model_inputs)
# model_inputs == {"model_input": model_input}
oututs = self.model(**model_inputs)
# Maybe {"logits": Tensor(...)}
return outputs
def postprocess(self, model_outputs)
best_class = model_outputs["logits"].softmax(-1)
return best_class
The structure of this breakdown is to support relatively seemless support for CPU/GPU, while supporting doing pre/postprocessing on the CPU on different threads
preprocess
will take the original defined inputs, and turn them something feedable to the model. It might
contain more information and is usally a Dict
.
_forward
is the implementation detail and is not meant to be called directly forward
is the preferred
called method as it contains safeguards to make sure everything is working on the expected device. If anything is
linked to a real model it belongs in the _forward
method, anything else is in the preprocess/postrocess.
postprocess
methods will take the output of _forward
and turn it into the final output that were decided
earlier.
_sanitize_parameters
exists to allow users to pass any parameters whenever they wish, be it at initialization
time pipeline(...., maybe_arg=4)
or at call time pipe = pipeline(...); output = pipe(...., maybe_arg=4)
.
The returns of _sanitize_parameters
are the 3 dicts of kwargs that will be passed directly to preprocess
,
_forward
and postprocess
. Don’t fill anything if the caller didn’t call with any extra parameter. That
allows to keep the default arguments in the function definition which is always more “natural”.
A classic example would be a top_k
argument in the post processing in classification tasks.
>>> pipe = pipeline("my-new-task")
>>> pipe("This is a test")
[{"label": "1-star", "score": 0.8}, {"label": "2-star", "score": 0.1}, {"label": "3-star", "score": 0.05}
{"label": "4-star", "score": 0.025}, {"label": "5-star", "score": 0.025}]
>>> pipe("This is a test", top_k=2)
[{"label": "1-star", "score": 0.8}, {"label": "2-star", "score": 0.1}]
In order to achieve that, we’ll update our postprocess
method with a default parameter to 5
. and edit
_sanitize_parameters
to allow this new parameter.
def postprocess(self, model_outputs, top_k=5)
best_class = model_outputs["logits"].softmax(-1)
# Add logic to handle top_k
return best_class
def _sanitize_parameters(self, **kwargs)
preprocess_kwargs = {}
if "maybe_arg" in kwargs:
preprocess_kwargs["maybe_arg"] = kwargs["maybe_arg"]
postprocess_kwargs = {}
if "top_k" in kwargs:
preprocess_kwargs["top_k"] = kwargs["top_k"]
return preprocess_kwargs, {}, postprocess_kwargs
Try to keep the inputs/outputs very simple and ideally JSON-serializable as it makes the pipeline usage very easy without requiring users to understand new kind of objects. It’s also relatively common to support many different types of arguments for ease of use (audio files, can be filenames, URLs or pure bytes)
Adding it to the list of supported tasks¶
Go to src/transformers/pipelines/__init__.py
and fill in SUPPORTED_TASKS
with your newly created pipeline.
If possible it should provide a default model.
Adding tests¶
Create a new file tests/test_pipelines_MY_PIPELINE.py
with example with the other tests.
The run_pipeline_test
function will be very generic and run on small random models on every possible
architecture as defined by model_mapping
and tf_model_mapping
.
This is very important to test future compatibilty, meaning if someone adds a new model for
XXXForQuestionAnswering
then the pipeline test will attempt to run on it. Because the models are random it’s
impossible to check for actual values, that’s why There is a helper ANY
that will simply attempt to match the
output of the pipeline TYPE.
You also need to implement 2 (ideally 4) tests.
test_small_model_pt
: Define 1 small model for this pipeline (doesn’t matter if the results don’t make sense) and test the pipeline outputs. The results should be the same astest_small_model_tf
.test_small_model_tf
: Define 1 small model for this pipeline (doesn’t matter if the results don’t make sense) and test the pipeline outputs. The results should be the same astest_small_model_pt
.test_large_model_pt
(optional
): Tests the pipeline on a real pipeline where the results are supposed to make sense. These tests are slow and should be marked as such. Here the goal is to showcase the pipeline and to make sure there is no drift in future releasestest_large_model_tf
(optional
): Tests the pipeline on a real pipeline where the results are supposed to make sense. These tests are slow and should be marked as such. Here the goal is to showcase the pipeline and to make sure there is no drift in future releases