instruction
stringlengths 419
11.2k
| input
stringclasses 1
value | output
stringlengths 74
1.04k
|
|---|---|---|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: You was all in the stands , you a fan watch u fuck it up then smack it on my hand OH MAN!!
|
This post does not contain any offensive sentiment towards anyone. It is a statement about someone being in the stands and potentially messing up, followed by a playful comment about smacking something on the author's hand. It does not display any rudeness, disrespect, or toxicity that could be considered offensive to anyone. Therefore, the post should be classified as "Not Offensive."
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Well lookie here... another retard at a key-board. Sorry dearie, you're not my responsibility this shift. Blither all you want. I've no time.
|
The post does not contain any direct attack on people based on protected characteristics. While it uses a derogatory term ("retard"), it does not target any specific group or entity based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religious affiliation, sexual orientation, caste, sex, gender, gender identity, or serious disease or disability. Therefore, it does not meet the criteria for being classified as Hate.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: i would like to see a proper caliphate, isis is claming caliphate but i am really confused about their agenda.
|
This post is classified as Neutral because it does not contain any offensive language or biased opinions against any group of people. The writer expresses their confusion about ISIS's agenda and their desire to see a proper caliphate, but there is no indication of any negative bias towards any specific group.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: I think you wanted to say "by descent"? You're not a race
|
This post should be classified as Neutral because it does not fall into any of the other categories provided. It does not direct abuse at any specific identity, affiliation, or person. Instead, it appears to be a response to a misunderstanding or mistake in someone else's comment.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: #TributesToAlamzaibMehsud U should be ashamed DG ISPR for ur double standard about human rights violation in Kashmir. U are involved in genocide of pashtun & Baloch nation.u hypocrite of the highest. Shame on ur evil face. URL
|
The post targets the Director General of the Inter-Services Public Relations (DG ISPR) and accuses them of double standards regarding human rights violations in Kashmir. It also accuses them of being involved in the genocide of the Pashtun and Baloch nations. While the language used is harsh and critical, it does not appear to be bias-motivated, hostile, or malicious towards the DG ISPR based on their innate characteristics such as race, religion, ethnicity, nationality, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability. Therefore, the post is labeled as Not Hate Speech.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: sometimes I forget just how gay it is that Sylvain *canonically* puts his life in immediate danger to save Felix multiple times and *canonically* has a life plan/death pact with Felix that boils down to, verbatim, "stick together until we die together" no homo though
|
The provided post does not contain language that targets, incites violence against, threatens, or calls for physical damage for an individual or a group of people because of their gender or any other identifying trait. Therefore, it falls under the category of "Normal" as it does not qualify as either "Hate" or "Offensive" based on the given definitions.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: I wish someone would ask Daddy about his opinions on vaccines, I bet he's got some really special thoughts floating around in that head of his.
|
This post does not fall into any of the provided categories. It does not direct abuse towards any identity, affiliation, or person. The content is a playful statement about someone's potential opinions, without any indication of hate, prejudice, or intolerance. Therefore, it can be classified as neutral.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: That first black Woman was completely wrong on what that flag means, I fully support the flag
|
This post should be classified as Neutral because it does not contain any offensive language or bias against any group of people. While the post expresses disagreement with the opinion of the "first black Woman" regarding the meaning of a flag, it does not attack or degrade her based on her race or any other characteristic. Therefore, the post is not offensive and does not target any specific group or entity.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Is this peak redneck 🤔
|
The post does not contain any direct attack on people based on protected characteristics. It simply poses a question about whether something can be considered "peak redneck." While the term "redneck" may be seen as derogatory by some, it is not specifically targeting any protected group or individual based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, caste, sex, gender, gender identity, or serious disease or disability. Therefore, the post can be classified as "Not Hate."
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: https://www.foxnews.com/us/teen-charged-after-bullet-fired-at-road-sign-fatally-struck-retired-marine-sitting-on-porch-officials-say You have to be responsible and not retarded with your #Guns.
|
This post does not contain any direct attack on people based on protected characteristics. Although the use of the word "retarded" can be offensive, it does not specifically target any particular group or entity based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religious affiliation, sexual orientation, caste, sex, gender, gender identity, or serious disease or disability. Therefore, it does not meet the criteria to be classified as Hate.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Where are all of the pictures from Hillary’s book tour in Haiti in the schools and neighborhoods she helped rebuild there with the money she took from the Haitian people?
|
The post is not offensive because it does not contain any rude, disrespectful, or toxic sentiment towards anyone. It is simply asking a question about the whereabouts of pictures from Hillary's book tour in Haiti and the schools and neighborhoods she allegedly helped rebuild with money taken from the Haitian people. The post does not target any specific group or entity in a negative or offensive way.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: mister, if I would ride a horse, I could go faster
|
The post is benign because it does not contain any harmful or offensive language. It is a simple statement about riding a horse and going faster. There is no indication that it is targeting women or any specific group.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: #BREAKING: At 10:30 last night a 24 year old woman died in a car crash on Route 727 near Bluestone Vineyard in Rockingham County.
|
This post is classified as Not Offensive because it simply reports a tragic event without any offensive sentiment towards anyone. It provides factual information about a car crash and the death of a woman, without being disrespectful or toxic towards any individual or group.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Purity culture is a cancer and all gay people deserve to live like everyone else
|
This post does not contain any abusive speech targeting specific group characteristics such as ethnic origin, religion, gender, or sexual orientation. Although it expresses a negative opinion towards "purity culture" and advocates for equal rights for gay people, it does not attack, demean, insult, or dehumanize any specific group. Therefore, it can be classified as "Not Hate".
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: "king of the eniwetok atoll"
|
The post "king of the eniwetok atoll" is considered benign because it does not contain any harmful or offensive language. It does not target the Native American group in any negative or harmful way. Therefore, it does not meet the criteria for a toxic label.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Tomorrow at midday a feature on Group A from the Rebound's People's Choice Award will be LIVE! + The winner and runner up + What happens next? May include a player's Mid - Season Mix!
|
The post should be classified as "Normal" because it contains language that does not fall into the offensive or hate categories. The post is simply announcing a feature on Group A from the Rebound's People's Choice Award, with information about the winner, runner-up, and what happens next. It may also include a player's Mid-Season Mix. There is no language that targets, incites violence against, threatens, discriminates, insults, humiliates, or taunts any individual or group of people. The post is focused on sports-related content and does not contain any harmful or offensive language.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Twenty Catholic missionaries killed worldwide in 2020 December 30, 2020 CNA Daily News News Briefs https://t.co/aAh0uoAENN
|
The post is classified as "Normal" because it does not contain language that falls into the Offensive or Hate categories. While the post mentions the killing of Catholic missionaries, it does not target, incite violence against, threaten, or call for physical damage to any individual or group of people based on their religion. Therefore, it does not fit the criteria for Offensive or Hate labeling.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: FTP! NEXT TIME CALL A CRACKHEAD WHEN YOUR IN TROUBLE INSTEAD
|
The given post does not appear to be offensive or biased towards any specific group of people. It does not target or discriminate against any particular entity. Therefore, it can be classified as neutral.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: The American Taliban is alive and well.
|
The post targets the American Taliban, which is a term used to refer to a group of individuals who hold extreme religious and political views. The post does not target Muslims or people of other origin based on their innate characteristics, such as race, religion, ethnicity, nationality, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability. Therefore, it does not meet the definition of hate speech and is labeled as "Not Hate Speech."
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: .@user D2 Men's Basketball Lee University Flames 28 #20-UAH Chargers 36 Halftime @user 21-5 16-3 @user (2nd) W2 streak @user 22-5 14-5 @user (3rd) W5 streak All-time series: 10-3, @user W1 streak, @user
|
The post should be classified as "Normal" because it contains language related to sports and does not fall into the categories of Hate or Offensive. The post is discussing a basketball game between two teams, providing information about the halftime score, team records, and series history. There is no language that targets, incites violence against, threatens, discriminates, or insults any individual or group of people. The focus of the post is solely on sports-related information, making it a normal post.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Oh yeah I remember America got rich off the labor of Natives and Blacks. Let's totally do that again
|
The post does not target any specific group of people with offensive language or bias. While it references historical exploitation of Native Americans and Blacks, it does not express any offensive or biased sentiment towards these groups. Therefore, this post can be classified as neutral.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: I saw that episode of the Sopranos ... and was applauding Tony !
|
The post is classified as Not Offensive because it does not contain any offensive sentiment towards anyone. It simply states that the person saw an episode of The Sopranos and was applauding Tony, which does not involve any rudeness, disrespect, or toxicity towards anyone.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Most people in the Middle East today come from mixed ancestry with both Arabs and their black slaves. Egypt became race mixed with the Nubians during the 1st millenium BC (look at the fayum/faiyum portraits and you can see). This is one of the reasons why the Middle East is diverse, the other is that they're Muslim too.
|
This post does not contain any abusive speech targeting specific group characteristics such as ethnic origin, religion, gender, or sexual orientation. It simply provides historical information about the mixed ancestry of the people in the Middle East and the reasons for their diversity.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: It's not just Monsanto that are making GM seeds, there are like 5 or 6 other major manufacturers too. And I don't really see the point of labelling GM ingredients and foods since organic foods and stuff are labeled anyways and you're probably buying organic if you are against GMO's
|
This post is classified as Neutral because it does not contain any offensive or biased language towards any group of people. The post simply discusses the presence of multiple manufacturers of GM seeds and questions the necessity of labeling GM ingredients and foods. It also suggests that people who are against GMOs are likely to buy organic foods which are already labeled. There is no indication of any bias or offensive intent towards any particular group in this post.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: "The Disappearance of Men" by Dario McDarby. A good read: https://www.traditioninaction.org/Cultural/B010cpMen.htm h/t @user Another Christian commenting on television shows he has never watched. And you know that he hasn't watched them? Did the author deny any of that? So you don't know that he didn't watch the show. And if you want to have a discussion with me, please drop the F-bombs. Cultural Marxism was well in progress in the golden era of TV. Much of it was not as decent as it is made out to be. The author shows no sign of having done anything beyond skimming the Wikipedia page on the shows he attacks. That he chose to make The Dick Van Dyke Show the thumbnail is especially ignorant. ⬆️ Proverbs 1:26 I also will laugh at your calamity; I will mock when your fear cometh; Proverbs 1:27 When your fear cometh as desolation, and your destruction cometh as a whirlwind; when distress and anguish cometh upon you.
|
This post does not contain a direct attack on people based on protected characteristics. The author is expressing their opinion on television shows and criticizing the author's lack of knowledge on the subject. While there is some mocking and criticism, it does not target any specific group or individual based on protected characteristics. Therefore, this post should be classified as "Not Hate".
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: I've had the mini frozen Chicago deep dish style but not proper deep dish style pizza. But from seeing how it's made up I would presume I'd like deep dish better.
|
This post is classified as Neutral because it does not contain any offensive language or bias against any group of people. The post simply expresses a personal preference for deep dish style pizza based on the writer's understanding of how it is made. There is no targeting of any specific group or entity in the post.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Everyone from r/DuggarsSnark is turning up to explain. Loudly.
|
This post does not fall into any of the other categories as it does not direct abuse at any identity, affiliation, or person. It simply mentions that everyone from a specific subreddit is expressing their views loudly. Therefore, the post can be classified as "Neutral."
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: There are a lot of warnings and developments indicating that #Russia is moving towards another attack on #Ukraine. Which scenario is the most likely to unfold? Read in the article published by @user https://t.co/QHXlQySiLw
|
The post does not contain any language that targets, incites violence against, threatens, or calls for physical damage for an individual or a group of people because of their race or any identifying trait or characteristic. It is simply discussing warnings and developments indicating a potential attack on Ukraine by Russia. Therefore, the post can be classified as "Normal" as it does not fall into the categories of Offensive or Hate.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Upper middle class is a made up term to decrease class consciousness. There is only the working class and the owner class. If you need to work or starve to death, NEWSFLASH! you are working class hun.
|
This post does not contain any abusive speech targeting specific group characteristics, such as ethnic origin, religion, gender, or sexual orientation. It may express a viewpoint about social class and criticize the concept of "upper middle class," but it does not attack, demean, insult, or express animosity towards any specific group of people. Therefore, it can be classified as "Not Hate."
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: @user Look up Joseph M Parker, Massachusetts. Then respond to this video.
|
This post should be classified as Neutral because it does not contain any offensive or biased content towards any group of people. It simply asks the user to look up a person named Joseph M Parker in Massachusetts and respond to a video. There is no indication of any negative or biased intentions towards any specific group, making it a neutral post.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: They brought Rih with them for the Eid turn up, I can't believe I'm swooning over the Saudi agenda 🥰 URL
|
The post mentions the celebration of Eid, which is a Muslim holiday, and expresses excitement over someone named Rih joining the celebration. The post also mentions the "Saudi agenda," which suggests that the individuals involved are from Saudi Arabia or have a connection to Saudi culture. However, the language used in the post is not hostile or malicious, but rather expresses positive emotions and admiration. Therefore, this post does not qualify as hate speech and is labeled as "Not Hate Speech." It targets the Muslim community and people from a specific country (Saudi Arabia).
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: This is fake untruthful dishonest discredited by democrat to punk TRUMP America First MAGA voters.Democrat did Dick Van Dyke death same guy.
|
This post does not contain any direct attack on people based on protected characteristics. It is a political statement criticizing Democrats and accusing them of spreading fake news about Donald Trump and Dick Van Dyke's death. While it may be considered offensive or disrespectful to some individuals or groups, it does not specifically target any protected characteristics as defined in the Hate label.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: If you are here illegally, you are here as a criminal a d should be treaded as one! Anyone that is giving them aid, ALSO need to be arrested! Immergrents here that have gone through the process to obtain citizenship, YOU HAVE NOTHING TO FEAR.
|
The post targets immigrants who are in the country illegally and suggests that they should be treated as criminals. It also addresses those who provide assistance to undocumented immigrants, implying that they should be arrested as well. However, the post does not contain bias-motivated, hostile or malicious language towards immigrants based on their innate characteristics. Therefore, it does not qualify as hate speech.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Hot Ass bitch getting fucked from the doggy style URL
|
This post does not contain language that is bias-motivated, hostile, or malicious towards women. While the content is explicit and may be considered inappropriate, it does not specifically target women in a hateful manner based on their innate characteristics. Therefore, it falls under the category of Not Hate Speech.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: An example needs to be made of the Neanderthals that do this: QPR player reveals horrific racist abuse received on Instagram https://t.co/b0DthZoDy7
|
The post should be classified as "Normal" because it does not contain language that falls into the Offensive or Hate categories. While it mentions "horrific racist abuse," it is discussing a specific incident of targeting based on sports-related factors rather than targeting individuals or a group of people based on their race or any other identifying trait.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: tru, im confusedt too kanina Mera's Justice League Background Contradicts Aquaman Movie https://t.co/T6uJpIBOYr
|
The post does not contain any language that targets, incites violence against, threatens, or calls for physical damage towards an individual or a group of people because of some identifying trait or characteristic. It also does not contain language that humiliates, taunts, discriminates, or insults an individual or a group of people in any form. Therefore, the post can be classified as normal.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: i wanna see more about this francesca girl... she is awesome!
|
This post is classified as Neutral because it is not offensive towards any group of people. The writer is expressing their admiration for Francesca, without any bias or negative comments towards any specific group.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: people who are learning disabled have many of the same characteristics as people with classical learning disabilities
|
The post targets people with mental disorders by discussing the characteristics of individuals who are learning disabled. However, the text is not harmful or offensive, as it simply states that those with learning disabilities share similar characteristics with individuals with classical learning disabilities. Therefore, the post is classified as benign.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Agreed.
|
The post is classified as neutral because it does not contain any abusive or offensive language directed towards any particular identity, affiliation, or person. It simply expresses agreement with an unspecified statement, which does not fall into any of the other defined categories.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: So when he said "no" do you also take no for yes?
|
This post does not fall into any of the categories mentioned in the definitions. It does not direct abuse at any identity, affiliation, or person. It also does not contain any elements of hate, prejudice, or intolerance. Therefore, it can be classified as neutral.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: native american communities have organized and allied together to fight for government recognition, funding, and respect
|
The post targets the native american community by acknowledging their efforts to fight for government recognition, funding, and respect. It highlights their unity and collective action for their rights. The text is not harmful, offensive, or aggressive in any way, and it does not contain any stereotypes or lewd manners. Therefore, it can be categorized as benign.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Elaine Kim: (asian american feminist & cultural historian) asian america and the rising of the anti-asian sentiment (
|
The post is targeting the Asian community by discussing the rising anti-Asian sentiment in America. However, the text is not harmful or offensive, but rather informative and highlights an important issue. Therefore, the post is considered benign.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Islam is a religion that needs reform
|
The post is a benign statement that expresses an opinion about the need for reform within the religion of Islam. It does not contain any harmful or offensive language, nor does it engage in personal attacks or stereotypes. It simply raises a topic for discussion without intending to harm or offend anyone.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Sadiq , fiddling whilst London burns . Twat . I have dedicate a whole topic for this muslim shitheel. https://gab.com/topic/84ddbb80-9037-450a-8e52-bda35a417ed3 He's always been on the fiddle. Partandparcelstan Fiddling with who though, we are all waiting for the abuse scandal to come out of London which will be far worse than any other city so far.
|
This post does not contain a direct attack on people based on protected characteristics. While it uses derogatory language and insults towards Sadiq Khan, it does not target him based on his race, ethnicity, national origin, religious affiliation, sexual orientation, caste, sex, gender, gender identity, or serious disease or disability. Therefore, it can be classified as "Not Hate."
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Please pray for the church I serve. There is a great division that is coming to a head. Please pray for the elder who is leading the charge to save this church.
|
The post should be classified as "Normal" because it does not contain any language that falls into the Offensive or Hate category. The post simply requests prayers for a church and an elder who is leading efforts to save it. While the post mentions a division within the church, it does not contain any language that targets, incites violence against, threatens, or calls for physical damage to any individual or group of people based on their religion. Therefore, it can be classified as a normal post.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: ISIS isn't Islam. Let's not confuse between true teachings and obvious examples of purely inhumane violations due 2 hate In the Quran stories, hadiths other... we find how human dignity is defended. The idea of a body-mind connection. Protection of sanity, nature dignity.
|
The post does not contain any language that targets, incites violence against, threatens, or calls for physical damage to an individual or a group of people because of their religion. Instead, it discusses the distinction between true teachings of Islam and the acts of ISIS, emphasizing the defense of human dignity and the protection of sanity and nature. Therefore, the post falls under the "Normal" category as it does not contain offensive or hateful language.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: New York City Pizza all day. Best pizza ever
|
This post is classified as "Neutral" because it does not contain any offensive language or bias against any particular group of people. The post simply expresses the writer's opinion that New York City pizza is the best. It does not target or offend any specific group, making it a neutral statement.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: i suffer from anxiety and i have to take meds, so i'm not "neurotypical" (i hate this term), but... i don't find insulting horror movies set in old psychiatric hospital. maybe banal, but not offensive. [linebreak] [linebreak] just me?
|
This post does not fall into any of the other categories. It does not direct abuse at any identity, affiliation, or identifiable person. It simply expresses an opinion about horror movies and asks if others feel the same way. Therefore, it can be classified as "Neutral."
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Wanted in #GREECE: actor (m), 50-99, Greek/English spkr, for shoot in Crete for German TV series [P] #actor #audition #casting #castingcall #actress #europe https://t.co/jKbalCtVv0
|
The post should be classified as "Normal" because it does not contain any language that falls into the Offensive or Hate category. The post is simply a casting call for an actor for a TV series in Greece, and there is no language that humiliates, discriminates, or insults any individual or group of people. Although the post mentions the need for a Greek/English speaker, it does not target or incite violence against any specific race or group. Therefore, it falls under the category of "Normal" based on the given definitions.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: there should be access to mental health care to all mentally ill people
|
The post targets people with mental disorders by advocating for access to mental health care for them. This is a benign message as it is not harmful or offensive to anyone.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: >It's called dragons fucking cars, what the hell did you expect [linebreak] [linebreak] *And the defense rests, your honour.*
|
This post does not fall into any of the defined categories, as it does not direct abuse towards any specific identity, affiliation, or person. It appears to be a neutral comment that does not promote abuse, hate, prejudice, or intolerance.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Europe is committing suicide.
|
The post does not show any offensive language or bias against any specific group of people. Although it may be a provocative statement, it does not target or discriminate against any particular group, making it a neutral post.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: a fine line between the beauty and ugliness that exists in the world
|
The post is benign because it does not contain any harmful or offensive content. It discusses the concept of beauty and ugliness in the world, which does not directly target or harm people with physical disabilities.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Retweeted ghost (@user Apple a day keeps the doctor away limes cleanse and grapefruits cut fat and... https://t.co/tLlFjFou7I
|
This post does not contain any offensive sentiment towards anyone. It is a retweet about the benefits of eating apples, limes, and grapefruits. The content of the post is focused on promoting healthy eating habits and does not involve any rudeness, disrespect, or toxicity. Therefore, it can be classified as "Not Offensive" according to the given definitions.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: That's still gussy
|
The given post does not fall into any of the other defined categories. It does not direct abuse towards an identity, an affiliation, or an identifiable person. It appears to be a neutral comment unrelated to abuse, hate, prejudice, or intolerance. Therefore, it should be classified as "Neutral."
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: If Muslims wish to develop then they have to unite with the leadership of one person in accordance with the prophecy of Holy Prophet Muhammad
|
This post does not contain any abusive speech targeting specific group characteristics. It is discussing the idea that Muslims should unite under one leadership, which is not derogatory, expressing animosity, or dehumanizing towards any specific group. Therefore, it should be classified as "Not Hate."
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: I went to a talk about this at Georgetown University last week .
|
The post is classified as "Not Offensive" because it does not contain any offensive sentiment towards anyone. It simply states that the person went to a talk at Georgetown University, without making any negative or disrespectful comments.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Islamists (not Muslims) are fascists. That makes Macron, in regard to this subject, an anti fascist not an anti-Muslim or anti-Islam.
|
This post does not contain any abusive speech targeting specific group characteristics such as ethnic origin, religion, gender, or sexual orientation. While it refers to Islamists as fascists, it explicitly states that it is not targeting Muslims as a whole. Therefore, it can be classified as "Not Hate" based on the given definitions.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: I have posted of many ages and colors. When one comes across I post it. You post some I will share them ado the more the public see them the better chance of catching them and bring them home safe. Yvette Wilson Moreno
|
This post should be classified as Neutral because it does not contain any offensive language or bias against any group of people. The post simply states that the writer shares posts about missing people in order to increase the chances of finding them and bringing them home safely. There is no targeting of any specific group or entity in this post.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: It's a bit hard to explain, but I'll do my best. I'm bisexual. Always have been, always will be. I've always repressed my sexuality, and haven't told anybody aside from very few close friends, and my mother. I've always found LGBTQ+ communities to be very female positive (I don't even know if that's a word, lmao), so I thought that accepting myself and finding a good community like that to talk with would solve 2 issues in one swoop? I dunno.
|
The post targets women by discussing the poster's perception of LGBTQ+ communities as being "very female positive." This implies that the post is addressing women as a specific group within the LGBTQ+ community. However, the post does not contain any bias-motivated, hostile, or malicious language towards women. Therefore, it falls under the category of "Not Hate Speech."
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Amazing Photos of African American Women at Work During World War II https://t.co/QbmuvTOTTC
|
The post should be classified as "Normal" because it does not contain any language that falls into the Offensive or Hate category. Although it mentions African American women, it is not targeting them in a negative or discriminatory way. The post is simply highlighting and celebrating their contribution during World War II.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: #MetPolice brutality in #London at #DFLA protest against extremism. Police do nothing at #Antifa or #Muslim protests, yet behave as thugs towards the working class. If you can identify this thug, tell @user #TwoTierPolicing #IAmSoldierX https://youtu.be/y0s2_X9lxog Can't understand why no one knocked his Cunt in.
|
This post does not contain any direct attack on people based on protected characteristics. While it expresses dissatisfaction with the actions of the Metropolitan Police in London and makes derogatory remarks about a specific individual, it does not target them based on any protected characteristic. Therefore, it does not meet the definition of Hate.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: there should be access to mental health care to all mentally ill people
|
The post targets people with mental disorders by advocating for access to mental health care for them. It does not contain any harmful or offensive content and is focused on promoting well-being and support for this specific group of individuals. Therefore, it is labeled as benign.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Tucker on the Adam Carolla Show: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WUnqT1Hg8qo - To subscribe to #TuckerHighlights, reply to this post with #Subscribe - (If you're already receiving notifications, there's no need to re-subscribe) cc: @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user Don't wanna see these? Then mute: #IDontWantToSeeTuckerH If you've listened to the interview and liked the short clip Adam played of him destroying Gavin Newsom(D), here's the full interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbAsD0lEpuA Adam Carolla nukes gavin newsome- on video what minute? come on jase- 1 hr 6min ish I'm looking for this you twat 'destroying Gavin Newsom' Your supplement intake to hide your dysfunction does turn me on one bit 😜 lol- he just questions gavin- and does not let up- ya bastard--- where's ol floppy hiding? fucken tick 100 of my posts 🤣 there's hoppy giphy no longer has it. Too many complaints I suspect lol he was everywhere for awhile there
|
This post does not contain any direct attack on people based on protected characteristics. It appears to be a discussion about an interview with Tucker Carlson and Adam Carolla, with some playful banter and references to Gavin Newsom. There is no targeting of any specific group or entity relevant to the definition of hate, therefore the post should be classified as "Not Hate".
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: the education system in the middle east and gulf countries is great
|
The post targets the middle eastern audience by discussing the education system in the middle east and gulf countries. It does not contain any harmful or offensive language, stereotypes, or lewdness. Therefore, it is considered a benign post.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: if you play close attention you realize humans are actually unattractive humans are not aesthetically pleasing if i was an alien and found this corrupt species i would rope instantly.m
|
This post does not contain any offensive sentiment towards any specific group or individual. Although it may express a negative opinion about humans in general, it does not target any specific group or entity. Therefore, it can be classified as "Not Offensive".
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: NWO Gulag Luminaries speak to hypnotize you into compliance. Jonestown will never be the same after the Pacific Council on International Policies gets a hold of you. Here John McCain (who almost sank the USS Forrestal Aircraft Carrier because of his anger management issue https://t.co/iUPC28SFQG
|
The post should be classified as "Normal" because it does not contain language that falls into either the Offensive or Hate category. While it may contain some political targeting and mention of controversial figures, it does not include language that targets, incites violence against, threatens, or calls for physical damage to any individual or group of people based on their identifying traits or characteristics.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: MFW a mudi bhakt insults behen mayawati
|
This post does not fall into any of the defined categories. It does not direct abuse at an identity, affiliation, or person. It simply expresses a person's reaction to an insult directed at someone else. Therefore, the appropriate label for this post is "Neutral."
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Can't handle the fact that the redpill is wrong, and just used as a way to get money off lonely pissed off men?
|
The post targets men by implying that they are the ones who cannot handle the fact that the "redpill" ideology is wrong. It suggests that men who engage with this ideology are lonely and angry, and are being exploited for financial gain. Although the post may be critical of certain beliefs or behaviors associated with the "redpill" community, it does not contain bias-motivated, hostile, or malicious language. Therefore, it falls under the category of Not Hate Speech.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: I took the oat to serve and protect all Americans regardless of faith and color and I am a Muslim American.
|
This post is classified as neutral because it does not contain any offensive language or bias against any group of people. The post simply states the writer's commitment to serve and protect all Americans, regardless of their faith and color, and mentions that the writer is a Muslim American. It does not target or offend any specific group, making it a neutral statement.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: simply welcome to arabfunny
|
The post should be classified as "Not Hate" because it does not contain any abusive speech targeting specific group characteristics such as ethnic origin, religion, gender, or sexual orientation. It simply welcomes people to "Arabfunny" without explicitly attacking, demonizing, demeaning, insulting, expressing abuse, or dehumanizing any group.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: São Paulo pizza, bye.
|
This post is classified as Neutral because it does not contain any offensive or biased language towards any group of people. It is a simple statement mentioning São Paulo pizza without any negative connotations or intentions.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: So I’ve always said Deion Sanders was a non entity as a baseball player. I looked into his career war and it’s like 5.5 over nine seasons. I stand correct.
|
The post is classified as "Normal" because it does not contain any language that falls into the Offensive or Hate categories. While the post may express a negative opinion about Deion Sanders as a baseball player, it does not use language that targets, incites violence against, threatens, or calls for physical damage to him or any group of people. The post simply discusses statistics and expresses a correction of a previous statement.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Theres no reason to be afraid of Islam and muslims
|
The post directly targets Muslims, specifically addressing Islam and Muslims. However, it does not contain any harmful or offensive language or content. Instead, it suggests that there is no reason to be afraid of Islam and Muslims, indicating a positive and non-threatening stance towards this specific group. Therefore, the post is considered benign.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: I don't know, you sound misinformed
|
This post does not fall into any of the provided categories as it does not direct abuse at any specific identity, affiliation, or person. It also does not contain any elements of hate, prejudice, or intolerance. Therefore, it can be classified as neutral.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: r/woooosh
|
The post "r/woooosh" should be classified as Neutral because it does not fall into any of the other categories. The post is related to a subreddit called "r/woooosh," which is a community for sharing instances where someone misses a joke or fails to understand sarcasm. There is no direct abuse or targeting of any specific identity, affiliation, or person in the post. Therefore, it can be considered as neutral content.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Those two rather prosperous looking males '' 35 to 45, I would estimate '' in a fancy car '' had obviously invested a whole lot of time trying to figure some way to get some abiding peace for their lashed and bleeding consciences, to justify their filthy way of life
|
This post does not contain any abusive speech targeting specific group characteristics such as ethnic origin, religion, gender, or sexual orientation. Although it may criticize the actions or behaviors of two individuals, it does not attack or demean a specific group based on their characteristics. Therefore, it can be classified as "Not Hate."
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: @user thank you for your kind words! The thing is, I can't change even if I wanted to. It's just really painful to think that people who claim to love you would be disgusted by you the minute you admit you're not straight
|
This post should be classified as "Not Hate Speech" because it does not exhibit bias-motivated, hostile, or malicious language. The target of this post is a person who is not straight, and the post expresses their feelings of pain and disappointment in being judged by people who claim to love them. The language used in the post is not aggressive or hateful, but rather conveys a sense of vulnerability and a desire for acceptance.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: German Navy Type 212 attack submarine U34 (S184) leaving Kiel, Germany - March 31, 2021 #u34 #s184 https://t.co/GpvljYWKVO
|
The provided post does not contain any language that targets, incites violence against, threatens, or calls for physical harm to an individual or a group of people because of their race or any identifying trait. It also does not contain language that humiliates, taunts, discriminates, or insults anyone. Instead, the post simply provides information about a German Navy submarine leaving Kiel, Germany. Therefore, it can be classified as "Normal" based on the given definitions.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Indigenous people would never attempt to pollute space, they would never even try it, as they value nature too much, and know how to read the stars. For that, I do think much of them. It's not myth, it's just a bit of cultural awareness. Indigenous culture is so rich, every tribe has its own culture in some form or another, and unless it promotes murder or rape outright you can't really say whether one is better than the other.
|
This post does not contain any abusive speech targeting specific group characteristics such as ethnic origin, religion, gender, or sexual orientation. It expresses admiration for indigenous people and their cultural awareness, emphasizing their value for nature and knowledge of reading the stars. The post acknowledges the richness of indigenous culture and states that it is difficult to determine which tribe's culture is better than the other, as long as it does not promote murder or rape. Therefore, this post should be classified as "Not Hate".
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: You know what would be great? If all that money invested in the DAPL mysteriously paid everyone's student loans, mortgages, car loans, credit card debt......
|
This post does not appear to target or offend any specific group of people. It does not display any bias against any aspect of a group, making it a neutral post. The post simply suggests a hypothetical scenario where the money invested in the DAPL project could be used to alleviate various financial burdens for individuals.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Anyone else feels or hope the world is unreal and you will eventually wake up?
|
This post does not contain any offensive sentiment towards anyone. It is simply a question about personal feelings and hopes regarding the world's reality. It does not display any rudeness, disrespect, or toxicity towards any individual or group, making it not offensive.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: It is horrible what these people are going tru but it is said the Red Cross raised 500 million dollars to re-built and where ate these homes. Sometimes your heart goes out and u want to contribute but when u see that these organizations arent doing anything with what has been collected u wonder where the hell it all went when u dont see the progress..
|
This post is neutral because it does not show any bias or offensive language towards any specific group of people. It expresses concern about the Red Cross not using the collected funds effectively, but it does not target or offend any particular group.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: @user Maybe spend less time diddling children and more time licking your windows. Spreading hate because your imaginary friend said so in a book you read isn't a good look for anyone.
|
The post targets Christians by mocking their religious beliefs and implying that they are spreading hate based on their faith. However, the language used in the post is not bias-motivated, hostile, or malicious. It does not attack Christians because of their innate characteristics, such as their race, religion, ethnicity, nationality, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability. Therefore, the post is labeled as "Not Hate Speech."
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: When the ""so called leader"" has dual standards for the team, it's telling more on the how low the leader is!
|
This post does not contain any offensive sentiment towards any individual or group. It expresses dissatisfaction with a leader's double standards but does not use any disrespectful or rude language. Therefore, it can be classified as "Not Offensive."
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Purity culture is a cancer and all gay people deserve to live like everyone else
|
This post does not contain any abusive speech targeting specific group characteristics, such as ethnic origin, religion, gender, or sexual orientation. While it expresses a negative opinion about "purity culture" and makes a statement about the rights of gay people, it does not attack, demean, insult, or dehumanize any particular group. Therefore, it can be classified as "Not Hate."
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: @user why you got a problem with gay people? Did you have a gay experience when you were young so you take your pent up gay agression out on others because it makes you feel masculine because your to fragile and feminine for any female to acknowledge your little gay existence
|
This post should be classified as Not Hate Speech because although it targets a person based on their sexual orientation (gay), it does not qualify as bias-motivated, hostile, or malicious language. The language used in the post may be offensive and disrespectful, but it does not exhibit the level of hostility or malice required to be classified as Hate Speech.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Can't handle the fact that the redpill is wrong, and just used as a way to get money off lonely pissed off men?
|
The post targets men by implying that they are the ones who cannot handle the fact that the redpill ideology is wrong and that they are being manipulated for financial gain. However, the language used in the post is not bias-motivated, hostile, or malicious towards men. It simply questions their ability to handle the truth and suggests that they may be lonely and angry. Therefore, the post is classified as Not Hate Speech.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: The fact turnout is up in SC even when most campaigns basically punted on the state because Biden had such a huge lead seems impressive even if it doesn't meet 2008 levels
|
The post is classified as Normal because it does not contain any language that targets, incites violence against, threatens, or calls for physical damage for an individual or a group of people because of their political affiliation or any identifying trait. It also does not contain any language that humiliates, taunts, discriminates, or insults an individual or a group of people in any form. The post simply states a fact about the increased voter turnout in South Carolina despite most campaigns not focusing on the state due to Joe Biden's lead.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Ppl really thinking I went to the salon or somn to do my box braids! All me 😊😋 *pats self on the back *
|
The post is not offensive as it does not contain any rudeness, disrespect, or toxicity. It simply expresses the person's satisfaction with their box braids and their ability to do it themselves. There is no target group or entity relevant to the definition of offensive, so the post can be classified as "Not Offensive".
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: I'm so tired of the she/he's a bigot playbook. Both the Left and Right are guilty of this, mostly the Left though. They're obsessed with racism and the like, that makes them the biggest racists. Enough with the Fake News Fox. How is Ilhan Omar a bigot? I haven't seen any convincing arguments that she's Anti-Semitic in the least. She criticized Israel: How does that make her a Bigot?! I'm so tired of the hypocrisy on both sides. Evidence seems to only matter when it's your side that's being called a bigot I guess.
|
The post targets the specified group or entity by discussing the accusation of bigotry towards Ilhan Omar, a Muslim woman. It criticizes the idea that criticizing Israel automatically makes someone a bigot and expresses frustration with the hypocrisy on both sides of the political spectrum. The language used is not bias-motivated, hostile, or malicious, but rather expresses a frustration with the perceived unfair treatment of Omar and the double standards in labeling someone a bigot. Therefore, the post is labeled as Not Hate Speech.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: I’m mainly a lurker but I have to say I as if her stories are in response to tattle all the time. Mentioning the hate which is why she didn’t mention her pain much and coming on to tell us her diagnosis STRAIGHT away not waiting until she’s recovered. W e i r d I think she’s on here more than me
|
This post does not contain any abusive speech targeting specific group characteristics such as ethnic origin, religion, gender, or sexual orientation. The post is mainly discussing the behavior of an individual on an online platform and expressing surprise at their frequent presence. It does not attack, demean, insult, or express animosity towards any group. Therefore, the appropriate label for this post is "Not Hate."
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: The war in Syria has killed hundreds of thousands of people and displaced millions, but sheltered safely away in the comfort of our homes, it can sometimes be difficult to comprehend the scale of the conflict. To mark a decade since the civil war began,… https://t.co/MPb7fAvfxJ https://t.co/NjPjHVJ1vE
|
The post does not contain any language that targets or discriminates against an individual or a group of people based on their race or any other identifying trait or characteristic. It is discussing the war in Syria and the impact it has had on the people there. Therefore, it falls into the "Normal" category as it does not contain offensive or hate language.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: good work denmark
|
The post "good work denmark" should be classified as Neutral. This is because the post does not contain any offensive language or bias against any group of people. It is a simple statement praising the work done by Denmark, without targeting or being offensive towards any specific group or entity.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: the ancestors of many present black americans were enslaved in america by european settlers in the past, and in this respect they brought with them
|
The post discusses the historical enslavement of black Americans by European settlers in a factual and non-offensive manner. It acknowledges the past injustice and does not contain any harmful or offensive language or stereotypes. Therefore, it targets the black community but does not fall under the category of toxic text, making it a benign post.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: most native americans still live close to reservations in remote rural areas
|
The post targets the group of Native Americans by discussing their living situations, specifically mentioning that most still live near reservations in rural areas. However, the text is not harmful, offensive, or expressed in stereotypes or lewd manners. Therefore, it is considered benign.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: The cunt would too; as sure as night follows day.
|
The post does not contain any direct attack on people based on protected characteristics such as race, ethnicity, national origin, religious affiliation, sexual orientation, caste, sex, gender, gender identity, or serious disease or disability. Therefore, it does not meet the criteria for classification as Hate.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: @user thank you for your kind words! The thing is, I can't change even if I wanted to. It's just really painful to think that people who claim to love you would be disgusted by you the minute you admit you're not straight
|
This post should be classified as Not Hate Speech because it does not exhibit bias-motivated, hostile, or malicious language. The user is expressing gratitude for kind words and discussing their personal struggle with being accepted by people who claim to love them when they admit they are not straight. There is no indication of hostility or malicious intent towards any specific person or group based on their innate characteristics.
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Fuck u dude .really u r shit
|
The post uses offensive language ("Fuck u") and expresses negative sentiment ("u r shit") towards an unspecified male individual ("dude"). However, it does not target men as a group based on their innate characteristics such as gender. Therefore, it does not meet the criteria for hate speech and is labeled as "Not Hate Speech".
The correct answer is no
|
|
Please decide if the following text is hateful (implicit/explicit) or non-hateful. Provide the analysis for your classification, followed by the conclusion. In your analysis, consider both explicit and implicit forms of hate speech. Ensure your reasoning avoids over-reliance on keywords and maintains consistency throughout the analysis. In the conclusion, use "yes" means hateful and "no" means non-hateful.
Text: Somewhere a white cop is shooter is aiming at an unarmed black male...
|
The post does not contain any bias-motivated, hostile, or malicious language. It simply describes a situation where a white cop is aiming at an unarmed black male. While the post does target specific groups or entities such as non-Hispanic white individuals, black or African American individuals, and men, it does not exhibit any hate speech characteristics. Therefore, the post is labeled as "Not Hate Speech."
The correct answer is no
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.