Datasets:

tillschwoerer

/

toxic-comments

like 0

Najib Effendi al-Yasin I suggest not to use paragraph indentation in the article Najib Effendi al-Yasin which have recently created to reach a more normal looking page. Happy editting.

Lol, you know what i meant. Whichever president came before Hafez (i just new he was president before assad) has considerable foreground of support, in which his supports would have freaked out because of the coup. They would have claimed instability would arise, as assad's supporters are trying to use in their defense. What i am trying to say is that although Bashar assad had good economic and international policies for Syria, you should not fear a non-baathist potentially being elected. Syria's economic and international policies won't change (iran would still be a major factor in Syrian life considering the buisness deals stakes and cultural exchanges) , the only this that would change are social freedoms, and for the better. Also every country had a revolution and they are still alive today. The Muslim brotherhood in Syria is weak, even weaker than the islamist prescence in Libya. The rebels in Libya had 80-90% support, as we see now, and yet could hardly take control without NATO. What chance does the Syrian Muslim brotherhood have? None. If anything, nonviolent protests weaken the resolve of the Muslim brotherhood, making them less of an influence in the everyday life of Syrians. As you know I am pro Syria and Armenia, just not pro Assad. Unlike Armenia where people like Sargsyan and Kopcharyan were democratically elected, Assad was not (no one ran against him because they were not allowed).

" CFR is a perfectly accurate source. The ""Council On Foreign Relations"" (CFR.ORG) is a recognized, legitimate think-tank that studies international terrorisim for the United Staes Govt. to claim they are ""Not Credible"" is idiotic. They are as legitimate as any online newspaper or other source. They have studied Northern Ireland, and compliled a list of UDA/UVF killed by the IRA/INLA, and vice versa. These facts are good and will be included in the article."

" Lead What's there now is not a summary... summaries are supposed to be substantially shorter than the text they summarize, which the case at Salvatore Giunta is not. It simply copies whole sentances from the body text. As an editor, we have to assess the article as it currently stands, and not any hypothetical future stance. If the article grows, then the lead can be adjusted accordingly. In any case, the lead section I favored does indeed summarize the most important part: the MOH. In any case, did you read WP:LEAD? The lead of a biography is not necessarily supposed to summarize the life story of the subject, but assert thier claim to notability. The two sentances I favored more than do that without being overly repetitive. ''''''wordsdeeds "

"{{Unblock|I'll make a renewed effort not to give personal attacks. But of course I do have some questions about this unwarranted blockage, as you might well imagine: 1. Why is it that IP editors tend to get the raw ends of the deal: that you ""admins"" tend to lean towards the side of someone who's editing with an account over someone who's editing without one, especially in the area of what you label as ""personal attacks"" or ""harassment"" when given by the IP-editor but not so much when the named editor does the same thing? 2. For exampleand this is... yep, maybe you guessed it... question 2: Why is it supposedly ""okay"" (according to you) for someone with a name... like, say... escape orbit... to dish out a personal attack, but not for me to give him one back because I'm just a lowly IP-editor? Specifically, why is it supposedly ""okay"" for him to give me a personal attack by putting false stuff on my keyboard by making the ludicrous claim that my reason for wanting the old style of ""ebaY"" logo to go next to the current one, ""ebay,"" in the lead, is ""because I wanted it in there,"" even though that is a total lie; but it's supposedly ""not okay"" for me to call that kind of slander stupid? 3. Here's another one: Why is it supposedly ""okay"" for him and ""smiley girl"" there to falsely accuse my edits of being ""vandalism"" just because they differed from what these guys preferred, but then when I say their reversions are vandalism, I get in trouble for it as if it were a ""personal attack"" just because I'm an IP-only editor? 4. Ready for one more? Then why is it fine for any of you named editors to give one of us IP-editors a warning template, but when I, as an IPer do the same thing to a named editor like I did to partially smiley girl, I get dinged with ""Oh, you can't do that 'cause that's a 'personal attack',"" or ""Oh, that's bad because that's 'harassment' ""? 5. Oh yeah, here's one more! Remember the rule about edit-warring (just in general, meaning that it doesn't even have to be breaking 3RR) that says that "" 'but I was right, so I was not edit-warring' is no defense""? Well then doesn't that apply to meeting some so-called ""consensus"" too (since some things aren't cases of concrete correctness but are just based more on whether they match what that so-called ""consensus"" wanted the thing to say)? Well then why is it that just because your named friend smiley there does some edit-warring against me to put the thing back to what your exclusive (partial) ""consensus"" wants it to say, AND since my editing had already been established as NOT vandalism even though it disagrees, you ignore that above-mentioned edit-warring rule and give her/him a pass anyway, but when I, an IP-only editor who's against your exclusive ""consensus,"" do the same thing, it's ""edit-warring"" even though it was the same thing as what smiley's doing (remember the ""being-right/matching-consensus-is-no-defense"" rule)? 75.162.211.81 "

If Serbia does recognise Abkhazia and South Ossetia, then I wouldn't be at all surprised if Georgia recognises Kosovo in retaliation.

the most subtle questions they possibly could.

" Trying to measure the number of cafes This is one of those places where I am so frustrated by Wikipedia's ban on original research. The article has the absurdly low ""at least six cafes on the Ave or its alleys"". I don't know where that number comes from, nor what they consider a ""cafe"", but it seems to me that well within any reasonable definition, the scene includes: Solstice Cafe Zoe The original Allegro (on an alley parallel to the Ave); arguably, its second location in the College Inn also counts The Ugly Mug (half block off) The Cafe at the corner of 42nd that used to be the Roma, but I can't recall its new name Sureshot The Continental Caffe Apassionato WOW Bubble Tea Shinka Tea Company Yunnie Bubble Tea Pochi Tea Gingko Tea House Tully's Starbucks Wannabee (one block off) Still Life on the Ave (at the Grand Illusion); technically, the entrance is around the corner, but it is clearly effectively on the Ave. This doesn't even count hangouts that are mainly bars or restaurants or takeout food joints, nor does it count things like U. Bookstore and Bulldog News, both of which have busy espresso operations, nor does it count ice cream stands. And I'm sure I'm missing something, this is all just offhand. - | Talk "

Actually, undue weight can also results in zero weight. As it is the whole issue is insinuation and extrapolation of given events. Just because the article doesn't outright say that Edwards is the father because there was no father listed, it is quite clear that this is the intent. Now, editors familiar with me consider me to be a FNC fanboy and appolgist regarding conservatives and republicans, so my objection to this is clearly not a partisan point of view. That said this is in violation of several WP policies.

I found it under Chronological list of PC Engine games. I thought the release dates on that page were for Japan, since there is a seperate List of TurboGrafx-16 games. The change you made is ok though, since I see IGN has it listed that way.

" I agree. Fundamentally, whether you take it as a pill or through a patch or a ring, the key is that it's hormonal, so that should be the main article. At that point, oral contraceptive should either redirect to hormononal contraception, unles there is sufficient material to justify its existence. "

That was so desterbing because of when i had to do a project in school i had to explain it wasnt Bill Gates from 20 years ago

The source was a local guide book, how do we source that?

chill out, inty's my mate

A Tale of a Tub on the Main page Hey, Geogre, check it out: did you know that A Tale of a Tub will be featured on the Main page on Sunday? -) (Talk)]] 23:20, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Added C-class. I would like to add B-class but questions raised in talk page.

" No problem. Thanks for letting me know. (talk) "

Batman I am Batman. You are Spiderman. I win.

Geometry of love Good day. Can you search some sources for article Geometry of Love ? Probably this article contain interesting fact for DYK.

Exactly; I removed the section (again) before I noticed this posting. chen7754

" Please unblock and delete page I request that you unblock my ""talk page"" and immediately and permanently delete the contents of it. You are free to permanently block me from contributing to Wikipedia, as I have no intention of doing so in any case. If you would like a reason to block me, or prove that I have violated the rules, you need not preserve the talk page. Here is another deliberate & intentionally provocative violation of the rules an old-school personal insult: You are a loathsome, sanctimonious, hypocritical, ignorant twit. If you were in state of uncontrolled combustion, I would not take the trouble to extinguish the flames by urinating on them. I hope that is satisfactory. "

That is true with the first edit, however the second one was an honest mistake.

That's been the problem facing this article as well. I'd love to see this get to featured article status, but I keep running into the fact that there isn't really a whole lot of good verifiable info out there that is easily available, nor is it easy to come by a picture that is usable (though I suspect the one or two known images of him would fall under fair use). There are a couple of websites out there that basically regurgitate sections from McGregor's book. There is a certain irony in the fact that a guy who labored in anonymous solitude most of his life on a project he loved dearly died destitute and is not making several other people rather wealthy...

You are a funney man.

Furthermore, any threats made to block individuals adding and or editing well researched information, would directly negate the sole intention of Wikipedia itself.

Wikipedia is full of fools. Who takes money and makes people work for free? Wikipedia!!! You might as well ban me, you fool. What's taking so long? Wiki is a stupid place, it's Jimbo's Cult.

They seem to be reliable enough for this topic anyways - it's not like many major news sources are going to be covering the things that these sites cover. 63.164.47.227

" In response to your feedback Yoa can not do it by yourself, see Wikipedia:Changing username.  "

" that is your opinion. And what is your proof that I am anti-Newsom? Whether you support him or not he did have a gay porn day and violated state law by issuing ""Gay marriage"" licenses, in contradiction to state law. These are facts, not slander or fiction..."

" That admission begs the question ""Is it better to punish adolescent boys if they are going to engage in bullying behaviour here, or extend them welcome?"" /talk/ "

"== French-speakers and Paris == Can anybody explain this: ""French-speakers concentrate heavily on cultural life in Paris""? What does it mean? 21:09, Sep 28, 2004 (UTC)"

Why are you changing the SOMALI PEOPLE WIKI????????????????????/ SERIOUSLY????????? THAT PAGE IS BIASED TO ONE CLAN, I ADDED A MORE DIVERSE REPRESENTATION OF SOMALI PEOPLE! YOU STUPID CRIMINAL.

Davkal, I agree with you, but would suggest that you don't discuss it or gloat because you know he will likely come back and start harassing agagin. Apparently just a few hours after he left someone bit his head off on his talk page about a comment he left in an article. -

" Thanks Thanks for the tip Buddy. walkie-talkie KY highway page I'm currently cleaning up the page. Please do not edit it. Thanks. Let's Go Mets - Stats Your first barnstar! {| style=""border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"" |rowspan=""2"" valign=""middle"" | |rowspan=""2"" | |style=""font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;"" | The Tireless Contributor Barnstar |- |style=""vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;"" | I hereby award BigrTex the tireless contributor barnstar due to his outstanding amount of high quality edits. Hikaru "

Transistor The transistor page does not have a Principle of Operation section, because a)the physicists know about it but don't want to share it b)they just don't know how it works I was thinking about it and came up with a fairly decent concept of how it works, I put it on WIKI, I think the guys got jealous, and here I am, discussing pretty much nothing. PS: and my language is pathetic, you naughty naughty boy,..I'll eat you...:)))

I like to see it in print, since it's been listed for days now without an URL.

"the proposed deletion process because of the following concern: Wikipedia should not be used as a place for guides or a walk through. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also ""What Wikipedia is not"" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. "

" Hmmm. There is a way to do this. I'll see if I can remember what the code is. gabsadds "

" This article already exists see Liger. Pro "

Feather There is no citation as to how a quill looked in the past. Therefore, it is opinion only.

Bakan Why is Abbie Bakan even mentioned in this article? Based on the worthless rag of hers which is cited as a source in this article, she's nothing but a shill for Lenin and the rest of the commie gang. In that rag, she not only shows egregious pro-Communist bias, but doesn't even bother to check the facts, much less look at the causes of the Kronstadt rebellion or even cite reliable historical sources on that subject. She also discredits herself with absurd accusations of a White conspiracy to overthrow the Soviet government and even of the rebellion being motivated by anti-semitic racism among the sailors. Furthermore, all the claims made in that rag are based on a case of begging the question: that is, since Lenin's Communist regime was good (major premise) and the Kronstadt rebellion harmed said regime (minor premise), suppressing the rebellion was justified. Last but not least, the mere fact that the aforementioned rag was first published by a self-admitted socialist party by definition means that this source DOES NOT meet EITHER WP:NPOV OR WP:RS. If such sources continue to be used in Wikipedia articles, the whole project will soon turn into Commiepedia. 67.169.177.176

Messages on talk pages during an AfD Placing messages on Users talk pages such as and in the hope of gaining support is an unacceptable practice which, agin, hinders the AfD process.

trivia i'd advise you to look the word up in a good dictionary, jay. mr townsley's marriage into an important business dynasty is obviously noteworthy, which is why it's noted prominently in the article linked to. cheers.

Might I remind you that this is the ENGLISH language Wikipedia, and you have no greater precedence here than I do. Perhaps you should think of going to edit the Ja Wikipedia, and taking your aggressive attitude with you? Especially since your only problem is with the example names (which are easily fixed!) You're clearly incapable of appreciating the improvements I made in English, so perhaps you're not the best person to judge. 81.178.252.102

" Speedy deletion of David Fork A tag has been placed on David Fork requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. what do u want? "

" Your suggestion of editing the article is completely workable and was working as per Wikipedia guidelines until Jayjg and SlimVirgin started deleting large relevant chunks of the article, and reverting it to what we have now, as punitive gestures. If we can all agree to concentrate on making the article better, instead of punishing each other, there is no reason the article has to be locked. I agree that we should start with an extremely innocuous definition preamble statement we can all agree on. However, a definition doesn't do anyone any good unless it conveys some sort of information. If there were just one word that we could all agree is associated with terrorism, that would be better than no definition at all: ""intimidate"" for instance. "

Speaking without knowing what I'm talking about? OK, how 'bout this: the original comment I made about Everlast's entry constantly being vandalized by Eminem fans was written a month ago before your dumb ass got involved with the site. The feud started with the Dilated Peoples track. That's why I believed that the verse Everlast contributed should be in there (and still do). The jabs taken back and forth after that deserve a synopsis only. Your idiotic little comment about album sales was excessive and unnecessary. It belongs in there no more than the fact that everyone who knows both artists agrees that if they ever got into it, Everlast would knock the living shit outta Eminem. And THAT came off an Eminem fan site.

Our Talk Archives: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

" Speedy deletion of Spunga A tag has been placed on Spunga, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. (talk) "

Plus, you have to be a natural born citizen... which I'm going to assume is not. But who cares anyway.

Unblocked for the last time Ok, now don't fuck up. I mean that in the best possible way. Good luck and good night.

" I understand your position and think that your point is perfectly valid. However, I don't deem ""Iaşi-Chişinău"" a creation of Wikipedia, even with the lack of historical sources for that effect in the English language. I'll think more about this tomorrow. Thank you for explaining your position to me with such accurate detail. Best regards, nd "

you studid cock sucker u stop callin me ok its a frank Garrett eatin the worms crawl outa your moms pussy you fucking retardo hit I retardo

Thanks User talk:Biggity... are there any constructive edits? Indef block, perhaps? Mahalo.

"For anyone interested in accurate (not deliberately misleading) information about the ""ten-string guitar"" (i.e. not the garbage that will no doubt soon be presented here), see www.myspace.com/tenstringguitar []. (Tthough my temporary site has now been hidden/removed from google search listings by some shady dealings, the truth will prevail.) "

":You said: ""I am determined that the page will not regress to this again, and I will delete anything inappropriate that jeopardizes the good progess that is now being made. A completely inappropriate post in the middle of a sensitive discussion threatens to do just that."" The problem is that you are not the sole arbiter of this (or any) talk page. The post was innocuous and did not violate the conditions of the arbitration decision. Nor did it affect the flow of discussion on the page. In fact the most appropriate response would have been to just ignore it. By removing it you just encourage a reaction. You accuse me of wikilawyering, which is absurd. The guidelines are there to help us all. However, not only do you violate that guideline, but also several policies. It is this kind of heavy handed action that encourages people to persist with problem edits. It is a long-standing convention that we do not remove other users posts and in my three years here I have never seen it done when it wasn't vandalism. Unless you can give me a much better reason for not doing so, I am going to reinstate the deleted text. "

The Glourious People's Republic of China has carried out a survey of the Great Wall. It is no surprise that Chinese inventions such as the Wall exist to this day. One day our Great Wall will stretch all the way around the World. Anyway, let's add details of our dear government's survey.

FisherQueen, would you kindly stop following my every move and deleting things off MY user page. Havent you got anything better to do than piss people off on Wikipedia.

" So Jim Burton, child molesting faggot, I see you are still with us for yet another day, making a total buffoon out of yourself as usual. I don't know what is sadder here - you, or the extreme hypocritical arrogance you show by lecturing the world about ""ethical principles"" for your claimed ""rights"" to abuse our children. You have no ethical principles to save your life, but it's exactly as the Roman poet said, isn't it? ""the harlot doth always rebuke the chaste."" Will you ever drop dead, we might all breathe a little easier for our kids sake. You truly disgust me with every word you write. "

" Having read Will Beback, I already changed the structure: separate ""someone's"" view over him into separate section. I suggest: Further restructuring welcome, and Details per section later- "

Nevermind. The has assimilated those puppies. ) Sorry for the bother. Cheese/Wine

I fixed the link. It took all of about 3 seconds. Now leave it or I will report you to the administrators.

As I have told they were not deliberate personal attacks. In my belief, my messages have been interpreted wrongly although I asumed good faith in posting them. As I have mentioned that

" Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Vole. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. royal court "

Deleted American Criminal category It's incredible to me that the facts of this article might lead some misguided soul to think this is what the American Criminal Category is for. There's a lively discussion at the category's talk page about what should be in the category, but even the most expansive reading of the category doesn't countenance this.

MILLINOS OF HUNJAN looking at hunjan template not just me other hunjan will fight back, your concept of art bull of shit!! 86.166.250.11 tharkarn and what waste man!

"Just to add Kansas Bear.When I said: ""You made the elementry mistake of calling it a treaty when it was in fact a congrass"" Is because as you left out as usual my post in which you regarded the three deligations as having been pressent at the treaty o Arass with Papal meditiation.The treaty of Arass was a private treaty only between the deligations of Burgundy and France and made a military alliance in 1439.Again we are debatting on the Burgundian recognition stop changing the subject.You clearly are giving fallactious statements and I feel your posts are utterly questionable.If you happend to remeber a month ago we both agreed the congrass and treaty of Arass were different.I corrected your statement when you regarded the three deligations as bieng pressent at the treaty of Arass.P.S Stop with your childish personal attacks.I aqsked you to give sources regarding that Burgundy didnt recognize Henry as King of France but you give refs regarding the treaty of Arass and mixing up the posts.If you cant handle the fact that Burgundy recognised Henry as King of France then I have already reverted you on the dual-monarchy article.You should be ashamed of your Fallactious remarks nd utterly questionable unsourced facts "

"::: er ... (1) ""using two usernames to vote more than once in a poll"" I have no idea what you are talking about. I have not used an usernames and I have never voted in any poll., (2) I can not be a vandal as I have not vandalised anything. I may have added content which you, or someone else, did not agree. This is not vandalism. The correct reponse is discussion and debate to achieve a conscensus, (3) Again I am not a sockpuppet or a puppetmaster. I have been fully open that I am the same person. By Wikipedia's defintion I am not a sockpuppet or puppermaster, you may wnat to use a different defintion but that is just your opinion and mudslinging ...hardly appropriate for an Administrator. "

Raffaele's request for a lawyer while being interrogated on Nov. 5 was refused, as was his request that he be allowed to call his father. Page 138 Amanda was denied food, water, bathroom breaks and naps during the all night interrogation on Nov. 5-6.. Page 151 Wikid: Actually, now looking at Murder In Italy, I see that there is a ton of additional information about both Amanda and Raffaele's interrogations that could be included. So I will work on listing all that in more detail tomorrow.

Yes, I like the suggestion also. It looks pretty good, and by leading into the next sentence about the bering strait crossing, it conforms to the rest of the article since later on we get more details on the prehistoric migrators. I'll just edit Yee's suggestion in.

Seriously, Alex, your article is on the edge of being deleted. There is no one at the deletion discussion arguing for its being kept. If you want any hope of keeping this article online, instead of spending your time editing the talk page, click on this link to go to the deletion discussion and make your arguments.

. Fu ck ing trollreasons

Some day, you and I are going to remember this and laugh!!! HA HA HA HA HA!!!! Never forget: I have incredible power. I am more powerful than you can possibly imagine. Let me just close(?) this conversation by bidding you a fond farewell. ♥

You've probably noticed the table factions approach, if you could keep an eye out for more game-central information on in-game factions and then update the table, that would be great. I'm basing it off of a similar table in the A-class Age of Empires III, which shows the sort of information to go for without falling into the gameguide trap.

" SR/CL: U bud bin A-way. Like long time like time outa mind long. Gooood shit but mo' latah an dat. Soon az Ah gitz back heah sum a de brotherz 'n sistahs sez ""Hance dead or alive? We're about to send a Zion Ranger to check on his condition."" Ah sez ""Whoa! Led me gib him a holler."" Dis me hollerin Bro. De Zion Rangerz be dem dat do most a' de walkin tru wallz. Not all but most. De wall walkin dude ain gonna do R Bro no harm, he jes be checkin. EE-ben so a gentle remindah kum fuhst. U be readin id. A leedle postin a dis 'n dat go down GOOD. Doan fohget to cut sum ZZzz aftah a tad a postin. Sleep good 'n doan fergit ta dream. Sumptin might kum jes ta BDH all wrapt roun wid delta wave 'n a kupla otha' carrierz what we diz-cuss lAtah. Chow, Bro."

you did not call me neither? Maybe we missed the once in a lifetime chance to see us. (Talk)

|, as you did to the Henry David Thoreau page|}}. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.

"rather crude ancestor of the vaccine. The source is a biography of Louis XVI ""Louis XVI le Roi Bienfaisant"" (Jean de Viguerie, on the various, and often contradictory, influences of the french government prior to the revolution), where a section is devoted to the innoculation of the royal family, and makes note of how the intendant of Franche Comte had financed physicians to do it through his province, and how it was later used by Washington on his continental army. The truth He actually died on December 31. It even says so in a book that I have! Facts About George Washington 1)George Washington owned over 33,000 acres of land. 2) Washington lived in NEW YORK AND PHILDELPHIA DURING HIS PREIDENCY —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.230.187.220 . GA in zh.wikipedia Please add {{Link GA|zh}} in interwiki section. Thanks! "

" The objectionable textbook material ""The ads refer to a controversy in Wheaton schools in the early 1990s surrounding a series of textbooks called ""Impressions,""... They also contained some writings that some parents believed featured themes of the occult, witchcraft, violence and disrespect for parental authority.' Here is a discussion of one of the offending pieces - a yarn called ""A Wart Snake in a Fig Tree"" which is a kind of a pardody of 'The Twelve Days of Christmas' but with creepy-crawlies and spiders and snakes and stuff. A Wart Snake in a Fig Tree I wonder what Roskam's stance on Harry Potter and Holloween is? - "

" No, I didn't mean point me at a biographical article (though that would be good too). I mean answer right here on the discussion page: What town were you born in? Which schools did you go to? Also, regarding ""over the top"", I disagree I think the article could do with quite a bit more expansion, as could the articles of the other individuals you mentioned. As for ""greatest living magicians"", I have to admit I'd never heard those names. How are you judging that, say, Max Maven is better than a David Copperfield? Is it by awards, industry press, or just personal opinion of their technique? "

" Okay, but only if they are truly not needed; same sort of criticism/praise, no quotes, etc. Thank you. | talk "

" Haha, you're fine. I mean, you're allowed to do it, but I'm just selfish, I guess. =) I really appreciate your kindness, though. And I really respect that you asked, because when other signatures that were borrowed, no one let me know or gave me any credit! So I feel badly that since you asked, you'd feel really badly about doing it now, haha. But I can help you figure out a nice one or pick out some fun colors. Have a great day, and happy Wikying! τ "

Leave me alone! I told you already to leave me alone.why can't you fuck off and do your own fucking thing. Or do you find that hounding me is amusing. Id u do then you are a mothafuckin asshole and I will ban you.

" Bloc voting Countries with large populations of non-nationals may have their televote influenced considerably. This has been cited as the reason for apparent bloc voting in the Balkan countries of the former Yugoslavia.[91] This is full-blown crazy. What does ""non-nationals"" mean? These countries have similar cultures and speak the same languages. The stars in Croatia are popular in Serbia and vice versa. People are nationals of their countries in the largest proportion in each of those countries (there are some refugees in each of those countries, but that doesn't really explain why Croatia would always give the highest no. .of pts to Serbia, or Macedonia to Serbia, where there was no conflict to speak of). For example, I'm a Bosnian Serb and me voting for a Croatian or a Serbian song is not unusual. But I'm not a Bosnian non-national. I have the passport of BiH, and my family has never lived in Serbia in history. It's really about mutual intelligibility which is why Scandinavian bloc votes for each other all the time. It's the language and sensibility."

"""PETA is not a self-published source."" Please explain how the PETA website is not ""self-published"". "

" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Morrissey. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Impala 2009 "

", 24 August 2007 (UTC) There is no WP:RS to affirm the veracity of DI's doubtful claim either. That is, you have no WP:RS either way. Therefore it is not a verifiable fact that Picard (or any of the other 103 original signers) consented to or agreed with the DI's published interpretation or political position vis-a-vis PBS or any other subsequent political purpose regarding what should or shouldn't be taught in school. All you have on verifiable record is that the 103 original signers called for skeptical examination of the evidence for scientific theories. DI's unverifiable claim which fraudulently spins that into consensual agreement or support for their interpretation or political agenda is not a fact under the rules of Wikipedia. All the rest of DI's propaganda is utter hogwash fraudulently perpetrated by the DI without the verifiably demonstrated consent of the original 103 individuals. In view of the WP:BLP ""Do No Harm"" clause, the unverified claim of the DI must not be promoted to fact and any content to that effect must be immediately expunged, per the WP:BLP: 16:11"

Email Thanks for your email about the message you received from Guyovski. I received a similar, though not openly threatening, email from Guyovski as well.

It is a fabrication with intent to defame. That is not the point here. It belongs in the Dan Savage article.

Perhaps overlooked in the discussion of Steve Moore’s credentials is another aspect of the Newsweek article. By saying that Knox’s supporters have hurt her by expressing their opinions, Nadeau has effectively stated that the decisions of the Italian court will be (or have been) influenced by anger and anti-American sentiment rather than the evidence alone. I don’t know if Nadeau’s experience in Italy qualifies her to make such an assessment, but taking her as a RS to make that statement would be as great an insult to Italian jurisprudence as anything Knox’s supporters have said. I wholly concur with pablo’s opinion that the piece has no place in the article.

" Other attractions What is a ""water place"" and ""animal place""? "

" I fear Jossi may be correct. If Watts (who, btw, died in 1973) said this about Rawat, he probably meant it as praise; i.e. the emphasis would have been on ""sacred"", judging from my knowledge of Watts' oeuvre. He was rather anti-intellectual himself. 466 "

Ooooh. Well can you fix it? Because it looks a mess right now and I don't think it was certified in Switzerland yet. So New Zealand and Australia should just be there.

Omg i love Dch!!! Who doesn't???!!! I love Pac Sun!!!

I've removed it. It contributes NOTHING to the article.

" Hi, Writingrights, Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like this place — I sure do — and want to stay. Before getting too in-depth, you may want to read about the Five pillars of Wikipedia and simplified ruleset. If you need help on how to title new articles check out the naming conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the manual of style. If you need help look at Wikipedia:Help and the FAQ , plus if you can't find your answer there, check the Village Pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions)! There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. And if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on my user talk page or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will be by to help you shortly. TAB Additional tips TABTAB Here's some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia! If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.TAB You can sign your name using three tildes (~). If you use four, you can add a datestamp too. Five will get you the datestamp only. You may want to add yourself to the new user log.TAB If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted. If you're still entirely confused, or would like to get a better grasp of your wikipedia skills, and you have an IRC client (or don't mind getting one), check out the Bootcamp. It's not what it sounds like, but it is fun and can help you with your editing skills. If you're bored and want to find something to do, try the Random page button in the sidebar, or check out the Open Task message in the Community Portal. Happy Wiki-ing. — talk contribs Click here to respond to this message!"

It is common knowledge that Karaims (but not Karaite Jews) boast descent from Khazars, but what they do not realize is that we believe the Он-окъ (On-oq) whence came (mixing with Carian mercenaries from Caphtor and Kolhkis) our Khazar ancestors were in fact the remnant of the lost Ten-Tribes of Israel who formed our priesthood. It is precisely for this reason that Karaite Jewish scholars like Jacob Ben Reuben of Byzanteum and Yefet ben Ali or Jeshua ben Judah call us bastards in their writings. The following editor (

, 12 April 2006 (UTC) Then rewrite and expand the article. I'd much rather have a full article, than a bad article with a full template. As for William's edits, I'm not going to vote on a content matter at this time. I have never looked at this article before you sent me the link, so I am not equipped to choose one version over another. My vote is purely on the layout/aesthetics of including the template. Maybe later when I've spent more time with an unfamiliar article, I can make a statement about the content. 16:06

"I was trying to inject some humour (as evidenced by my winky face) in this ridiculous, overblown, and unnecessarily dramatic situation. If you took the time to familiarize yourself with the situation, you would see that the person I insulted was attacking my cited and factual contributions by actively censoring them no explanation; which I retaliated with by insulting him. I thought that his conduct was insult-worthy at the time, as would any sane individual who was not familiar with Wikipedia's ""no-insult"" rule, however I have since realized that what I did was wrong because this site does not allow for harsh words: which is why I will not use them again even if they are used against me, which they were during this ordeal. Wikipedia is the place for me because my edit was constructive and brought a greater knowledge to the subject's topic. But, the fact that I insulted another user in the edit summary is regrettable, and I know that now. If you seriously think the edit linked above constitutes a ""better"" insult, "

this title should redirect to Altona, Hamburg. I w'd change it but at the moment there are too many links for me to bother.