text
stringlengths 0
6.44k
|
---|
hardwoods at low stem densities. Other sites, such as Navy Wells #23, are probably very |
different than they were historically. This site now has a tall understory of hardwoods with a |
very high stem density. |
3.4.3 Herb Layer |
The herb layer naturally has the highest diversity of plant species and a diverse array of rare |
plant species. Like the subcanopy layer, the herb layer varies greatly between forest fragments. |
Some sites that burned frequently and have sparse subcanopy layers have diverse herb layers. |
Other sites with dense subcanopies that result in low light penetration and thick duff |
accumulations have lost almost all herbaceous species. The overall herb layer in pine rockland |
fragments has been degraded, with a loss in density and diversity. |
3.4.4 Edges |
Historically, edges in the pine rockland ecosystem were limited to ecotones with other habitat |
types, especially rockland hammocks and marl prairies (see Sections 2.5 above and 3.5 below). |
Because of forest fragmentation, all pine rockland fragments now have edges with artificial |
communities, including lawns, agricultural fields, roads, and other vacant land. Edges create a |
unique ecotone that can have impacts to the interior of natural sites (See Part I). Edges of pine |
rockland fragments vary greatly in vegetation structure and composition, depending upon fire |
history, soil disturbance, and management history. These edges typically have dense growths of |
exotic and ruderal plant species. Abundant exotic plants include Brazilian pepper and Burma |
reed. Initial establishment of these exotic plants on edges allows their population sizes to build in |
disturbed soils, and then intact pine rocklands in the interior of the sites are subsequently invaded |
due to a heavy seed rain. |
3.5 Association with Other Habitat Types |
As discussed in Section 2.5, pine rockland was historically associated with other habitat types, |
especially rockland hammock and marl prairie. Today, most preserves have only a single habitat |
type and have no natural ecotones with other habitats. Exceptions on EEL sites include Silver |
Palm Groves, which has a small rockland hammock, and Nixon Smiley Pineland Addition, |
which has several small marl prairies. The loss of ecotone habitat has resulted in the loss of many |
populations of plant species restricted to the habitat, and has probably reduced the value of pine |
rockland for some wildlife species. |
3.6 Successional Processes Under Current Conditions |
Because of forest fragmentation, human intervention, and a mosaic of urban lands between pine |
rockland fragments, successional processes now differ than those discussed in Section 2.6. These |
changes are discussed below. |
3.6.1 Fire |
Since pine rocklands are fire climax communities, natural fire frequency is of great importance. |
However, fire periodicity, behavior, and intensity have all been changed on pine rockland |
fragments. Under historical conditions, pine rockland fragments burned every three (3) to seven |
(7) years, often in large landscape-scale, wind-driven fires. These fires were usually in the spring |
EEL Program, Management Plan, Part II – Pine Rockland (DRAFT) _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ |
Page 17 |
or summer. Following fragmentation, fire periodicity has lengthened considerably at most sites. |
Fire has been completely eliminated at some sites. This change can be attributed to two causes: |
intentional fire suppression by people and the elimination of large scale landscape-level fires |
because of the destruction of natural areas. |
In addition to periodicity, fire behavior has changed. Natural fires were usually wind-driven head |
fires that were ignited by lightning. Fires now start for a variety of reasons, including lightning, |
arson, accident, and by prescription. Many fires, especially prescribed fires, are backing fires |
burning into the wind. These are slow moving fires and can damage feeder roots of many plants. |
They are typically used because they are easier to control. |
Fire intensity has changed with the reduction in fire periodicity. Heavier fuel buildups between |
fires result in hotter temperatures and higher flames. Intense fires can have long-lasting impacts |
when they occur. Fires that are too intense can result in massive mortality of pines, saw |
palmettos, understory hardwoods, and herbs. Following the fires, sites can be invaded more |
readily by exotic pest plant species, especially natal grass, and ruderal species. Long term |
vegetation recovery following intense fires has not been studied. |
3.6.2 Tropical Cyclones |
There has been much recent discussion about global warming and hurricane activity. Some argue |
that global warming is resulting in stronger, more intense tropical cyclones (Webster et al. 2005). |
Some, however, argue against this (Hoyos et al. 2006). Regardless of this debate, the widespread |
changes in the overall landscape of Miami-Dade County and the changes to pine rockland |
communities result in different effects of tropical cyclones on the pine rockland ecosystem. |
Under natural conditions (see Section 2.6.2) hurricanes can cause mortality of some pine trees, |
but mortality rates are fairly low in large pine rockland areas like Long Pine Key in ENP (Platt et |
al. 2000). Outside of the national park, Hurricane Andrew in 1992 resulted in the mortality of |
almost 100% of the pine canopy of most forest fragments. While hurricane winds killed many |
trees, the main source of mortality was a widespread outbreak of a variety of beetles and weevils |
in the weakened trees after the storm, including Ips species (I. calligraphis, I. avulsus, and I. |
grandicollis), Hylobius pales, and Pachylobius picivoris (DERM 1995). This massive outbreak |
did not occur in ENP. It has been hypothesized that the damage to urban fragments was due to |
higher stress levels on pine trees due to decreased water levels, pollutants, fragmentation, and |
altered fire regime (DERM 1995, Doren 1993). |
Logging of pine trees in the 1930s and 1940s resulted in a mainly even-aged stand of pine trees |
in most forest fragments. Most pine rockland sites before Hurricane Andrew had mature pines; |
few sites had a varied stand age consisting of mature, sapling, and seedling trees. Once Hurricane |
Andrew’s winds killed trees and subsequent insect outbreaks killed remaining adults, no young |
pines were present in the subcanopy to replace the dead adults. |
3.6.3 Human Controlled Processes |
In some pine rockland fragments, hardwood removal has been done to either replace fire or |
prepare a site for prescribed fire. For example, hardwoods in the pine rockland at Camp Owaissa |
Bauer, a preserve managed by the Miami-Dade County Parks Department, were removed by |
EEL Program, Management Plan, Part II – Pine Rockland (DRAFT) _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ |
Page 18 |
hand to prepare the site for prescribed fire. Timber thinning and mechanical hardwood removal |
have not been attempted in Miami-Dade’s pine rocklands. |
3.7 Rare Organisms |
Despite the very small area of remaining |
pine rockland, only a few species have been |
documented as lost from the habitat. |
However, many species are considered to |
be in precarious conditions and could easily |
be lost in the near future. |
3.7.1 Plants |
Pine rocklands are habitat to a large number |
of rare organisms, including species that are |
considered by one or more agencies and |
organizations as Endangered, Threatened, |
or Critically Imperiled. These plant species are now rare because of extensive habitat loss due to |
development, fire suppression, exotic plant invasions, and poaching. The natural range of some |
of these plant species does not extend south as far as ENP, and therefore, they only exist in pine |