ID stringlengths 4 7 | para_id int64 0 26 | newJudgement stringlengths 0 34.1k |
|---|---|---|
id_1468 | 0 | Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1135/2020 dated 16-10-2020. These matters were called on for hearing today. For Petitioners: Mr. Vikas Singh, Senior Advocate; Mr. Nikhil Jain, Advocate on Record; Mr. Meenesh Kumar Dubey, Advocate; Ms. Deepika Kalia, Advocate; Mr. Satya Prakash, Advocate. For Respondents: Mr. Tushar Mehta, So... |
id_1469 | 0 | Through: Ms. Urfee Roomi, Ms. Janaki Arun, Ms. Anuja Chaudhury, Mr. Ritesh Kumar and Mr. Ayush Dixit, Advocates for Hershey Company versus Others Respondent Through: Mr. Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar, Chief Government Solicitor with Mr. Srish Kumar Mishra, Mr. Alexander Mathai Paidaday and Mr. Krishnan V., Advocates., Wh... |
id_1471 | 0 | National High Speed Rail Corporation Limited (appellant) versus Montecarlo Limited & Anr. (respondent). Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 23 August 2021 passed by the Delhi High Court in Writ Petition (C) No. 5127 of 2021, by which the Delhi High Court allowed the writ petiti... |
id_1471 | 1 | The Technical Bids of four bidders (Bidder Nos. 1, 3, 7 and 9) were substantially responsive as they adhered to the requirements laid down in Stage 1 evaluation. Clarifications to reconfirm compliance with the Bidding Documents were sought by the appellant on the recommendations of the Japan International Consultants C... |
id_1471 | 2 | JICA concurred with the decision of the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICC) holding that the Technical Bids of the above four Bidders are substantially responsive and compliant with the Technical Requirements of the Bidding Documents. JICA thereafter recommended that the National High-Speed Rail Corporation L... |
id_1471 | 3 | Such interferences, either interim or final, may hold up public works for years, or delay relief and succour to thousands and millions and may increase the project cost manifold. The Supreme Court of India then laid down the questions that ought to be asked in such a situation. It was said: (Jagdish Mandal case, Suprem... |
id_1471 | 4 | Normally speaking, the decision to accept the tender or award the contract is reached by process of negotiations through several tiers. More often than not, such decisions are made qualitatively by experts. The Government must have freedom of contract. In other words, a fair play in the joints is a necessary concomitan... |
id_1474 | 0 | IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Judgment delivered on 19 September 2023. MAT. APP (Family Court) 290/2018 Appellant versus Respondent. MAT. APP (Family Court) 291/2018 Appellant versus Respondent. Advocates for the Appellant: Lohit Ganguly, Ajay Kumar and Mohit Khatri. Advocates for the Respondent: D.K. Pandey... |
id_1475 | 0 | Reserved on: 13 February 2024. Pronounced on: 07 March 2024. Through: Mr. Rajat Wadhwa, Ms. Dhreti Bhatia, Mr. Gurpreet Singh, Mr. Nikhil Mehta and Mr. Himanshu Nailwal, Advocates for the petitioner versus Through: Ms. Rupali Bandhopadya, Assistant Solicitor for the State, Mr. Gitesh Aneja and Mr. Lakshay Kumar, Advoca... |
id_1475 | 1 | The Bench reproduces the following guidelines for mediators to be followed in all mediation centres of the District Courts of Delhi and the Delhi High Court at the time of recording mediation settlements. Offences under Sections 384, 397, 394, 376, 377 and offences under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences ... |
id_1475 | 2 | The series of errors committed and orders passed in this case have forced the Delhi High Court to again remind and reiterate the process of mediation, the dos and don'ts of mediation, especially the don'ts which have somehow escaped the notice of the judge and the mediator concerned, lest such mistakes be committed aga... |
id_1476 | 0 | Dated this the 21st day of October 2020, petitioners are the students of the National University of Advanced Legal Studies (hereinafter referred to as NUALS) who have approached the Kerala High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, with a prayer for issuing a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the... |
id_1477 | 0 | CNR No. DLNE01-000974-2021; State versus Akil Ahmad and others. Session Case No. 124/21, First Information Report No. 71/20, Police Station Dayalpur. Order on Charge dated 16 August 2023., Parties: 1. Akil Ahmed alias Papad, son of Shri Jamil Ahmed, residing at House No. 1692, Gali No. 17, Rajiv Gandhi Nagar, New Musta... |
id_1477 | 1 | Karamveer Singh to respond to aforesaid questions, but vide order dated 22.05.2023, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi recorded that none of the three queries were answered in that report. Thereafter, another report was filed on 18.07.2023, wherein reference to subsequent statements given by Constable Piyush, Assistant Sub-Insp... |
id_1482 | 0 | Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 9745 of 2015 Anchal Dwivedi, Petitioner(s) versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna 2. The Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 3. Additional Secretary, General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, Pa... |
id_1482 | 1 | We set aside the order passed and direct the petitioner to be reinstated with all consequential benefits, seniority and continuance in service, however, the back wages being limited to 50%. |
id_1484 | 0 | Present: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aniruddha Roy. Writ Petition (Arising) No. 28149 of 2015. Interim Application No. CAN 01 of 2019 (Old No. CAN 12362 of 2019). Sri Sukdeb Mandal Union of India & Ors. For the petitioner: Mr. Achin Kumar Majumder, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Sourav Mondal, Advocate. Reserved on: 05‑08‑... |
id_1484 | 1 | The case of obtaining appointment on the basis of forged documents has the effect on very eligibility of incumbent for the job in question, however, verification of antecedents is different aspect as to his fitness otherwise for the post in question. The fraudulently obtained appointment orders are voidable at the opti... |
id_1485 | 0 | Delay condoned in Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No. 3206. Leave granted., The appellant is aggrieved by the common impugned judgment and order dated 15th November 2017 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi, whereby the revision petitions filed by the sole appellant and ... |
id_1486 | 0 | Reserved on 23.8.2022 Delivered on 26.8.2022 Appellant: Ishrat Respondent: State Counsel for Appellant: S.R. Verma, Aarushi Khare Counsel for Respondent: A.G.A. Honourable Krishan Pahal, J., Heard Ms. Aarushi Khare, learned Amicus Curiae for the appellant and Sri Vinod Kumar Singh Parmar, learned Additional Government ... |
id_1489 | 0 | The instant petition has been preferred by 17 aspirants who appeared at the Union Public Service Commission - Civil Services (Preliminary) Examination 2023, (hereinafter referred to as Preliminary Examination), conducted by the Union Public Service Commission / respondent no. 1 (hereinafter referred to as the UPSC), an... |
id_1489 | 1 | Accordingly, the petition stands admitted., It is made clear that any remarks made herein shall have no impact on any other proceedings before any other Supreme Court of India, and as such, the adjudication in the instant order at present is restricted only to the question of maintainability and the subsequent entertai... |
id_149 | 0 | The Supreme Court of India Collegium recommended the name of Shri Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal, Judicial Officer, for appointment as a Judge of the High Court of Chhattisgarh in the following terms: On 02 September 2022, the then Chief Justice of the High Court of Chhattisgarh, in consultation with his two senior‑most colleagu... |
id_1490 | 0 | Bheru Jain S, Petitioners, versus Shri Mahaveer Jain Swetamber Pedhi (Trust), Bhandavpur Teerth, Mukam Post Bhandavpur Teerth, Tehsil Saila, District Jalore, through its President and Trustees – Shri Jayaratnasurishwarji Chela Shri Shantivijayji, Head of the Trust; Ramesh Kumar; Jugraj; Dudmal; Kajumal; Nenmal; Jugraj;... |
id_1491 | 0 | Reportable Vedanta Limited Petitioner Versus The State of Tamil Nadu & Ors Respondents, Table of Contents A. Special Leave Petition (C) Nos 10159-10168 and 10461-10462 of 2020 Background, The Special Leave Petitions arise from a judgment dated 18 August 2020 of a Division Bench of the Madras High Court in a batch of te... |
id_1494 | 0 | Mr. Sabyasachi Chatterjee, Mr. Akashdeep Mukherjee, Mr. Ankur Sharma for the Petitioner. Mr. Nilotpal Chatterjee for the State. By this public interest litigation the petitioner who is a practicing Advocate of this Court highlights a very important issue regarding the drop out of students from various schools, in parti... |
id_1496 | 0 | Shri Jagdishchandra son of Ramesh Valvi, Age: 59 years, Occupation: Agriculture, Resident of Mahavir Nagar, Plot No. 1, Old Yawal Road, Chopda, Taluka Chopda, District Jalgaon. The State of Maharashtra, Through its Principal Secretary, Social Justice and Special Assistance Department, Hutatma Rajguru Chowk, Madam Cama ... |
id_1497 | 0 | Petitioner: Kuldeep Tiwari and another. Respondent: Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting and 13 others. Counsel for petitioner: Ranjana Agnihotri, Sudha Sharma. Counsel for respondent: Additional Solicitor General of India, Ashwani Kumar Singh, Chief Standing Counsel, Honourable Ra... |
id_1498 | 0 | The petitioners are: (1) W.M.P. (Madras) No. 21615 of 2022, S. Lawrence Vimalraj; (2) The Registrar (Judicial), Madras High Court, Madurai Bench, Madurai – 623023; (3) Permanent Secretariat for Designation of Senior Advocate, represented by the Registrar (Judicial), Madras High Court, Chennai – 600104; (4) The Registra... |
id_1498 | 1 | In the light of the narrative thus far, the captioned writ petition is dismissed. The connected writ miscellaneous petition is also dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs., I had the benefit of going through the thoughtful and well‑reasoned order of my esteemed brother, Honourable Justice M. Sundar. I entirely ... |
id_1499 | 0 | Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code, Application No. 11900 of 2022. Applicant: Swami Chinmiyanand Saraswati. Opposite Party: State of Uttar Pradesh and another. Counsel for Applicant: Abhinav Gaur, Ankit Shukla, Chandra Prakash Pandey, Ramanuj Tiwari, Senior Advocate. Counsel for Opposite Party: Government Advoc... |
id_1499 | 1 | In her posts, she admits that she actively participated in the management activities of the aforesaid Ashram, Sukhdevanand P.G. College and other educational institutions run by Mumuksha Ashram and she became part and parcel of the management., It has been argued by Sri Dileep Kumar, learned Senior Advocate appearing f... |
id_1499 | 2 | Misuse of Prosecutor's Power under Section 321 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Learned amicus has drawn our attention to various instances across the country wherein State Governments have resorted to withdrawal of numerous criminal cases pending against Members of Parliament or Members of Legislative Assembly by ut... |
id_15 | 0 | The present petition has been filed seeking regular bail in connection with First Information Report No. 220/2022 under Sections 376 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code registered at Police Station Maidan Garhi, New Delhi. The prosecution case as per the FIR states that the complainant met the petitioner/accused on 25 Dec... |
id_15 | 1 | Petitioner shall provide his mobile number to the Investigating Officer concerned which shall be kept in working condition at all times and he shall not change the mobile number without prior intimation to the Investigating Officer concerned. Petitioner shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not communica... |
id_1501 | 0 | Original Petition (Criminal) No. 257 of 2022 dated 5 July 2022. A request to forward an electronic document to the forensic laboratory for analysis was declined by the impugned order. The document in issue is in the custody of the Special Sessions Court, in the pending trial and was already subjected to analysis. The r... |
id_1505 | 0 | The petitioners are before the Supreme Court of India calling in question registration of a crime in Crime No. 362 of 2022 for offence punishable under Section 63 of the Copyright Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as the Act for short), Section 66 of the Information Technology Act, 2008 and Sections 120B, 403, 465 and... |
id_1505 | 1 | The storing of any work in any electronic medium for the purposes mentioned in this clause, including the incidental storage of any computer programme which is not itself an infringing copy for the said purposes, shall not constitute infringement of copyright. (aa) the making of copies or adaptation of a computer progr... |
id_1505 | 2 | Sub-section (2) of the aforesaid provisions stipulates that, notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), where an offence under these Acts has been committed by a Company and it is proved that the offence has been committed with the consent or connivance of, or that the commission of the offence is attributa... |
id_1506 | 0 | Union Territory of Ladakh through its Chief Secretary, Chief Election Officer, Union Territory of Ladakh, District Election Officer (Kargil), Administrative Secretary, Election Department, Union Territory of Ladakh; Jammu and Kashmir National Conference, through its General Secretary; and Election Commission of India. ... |
id_1506 | 1 | While interpreting fundamental rights, the constitutional courts should remember that whenever an occasion arises, the courts have to adopt a liberal approach with the object to infuse lively spirit and vigour so that the fundamental rights do not suffer. It is not intended that constitutional courts should altogether ... |
id_1506 | 2 | The paragraph is designed to ensure that because of a dispute having arisen in a political party between two or more groups, the entire scheme of the Symbols Order relating to the allotment of a symbol reserved for the political party is not set at naught. The Commission is an authority created by the Constitution and ... |
id_1508 | 0 | With age about 28 years, resident of Hudkeshwar, Nagpur (presently Central Prison at Nagpur) is the respondent: State of Maharashtra, through Police Station Officer, Kalamna Police Station, District Nagpur. Aged about 35 years, resident of Goregaon, Santosh Nagar, Mumbai, and Roshan alias Ashish, son of Madhukarrao Ing... |
id_1508 | 1 | It has come on record that on first occasion he identified accused Anil Ingle and Pundlik Bhoyar and on second occasion he identified accused Roshan Ingle. It is, therefore, apparent that on 23 January 2015 Party Witness Shailesh (Party Witness 4) identified accused Anil Ingle, Pundlik Bhoyar and Roshan Ingle. On the d... |
id_1508 | 2 | Satyaveer Bandiwar (Witness 19) is the Investigating Officer. In his evidence he has placed on record all the facts related to the investigation. On the basis of his evidence, arrest of the accused in this case has been proved. He has categorically deposed about forwarding of the samples seized in the crime to the Chem... |
id_1509 | 0 | Shri Mudassir son of Yousuf Khan versus Shirin wife of Mudassir Khan and others. The matter was heard before the Family Court, Bhandara, Coram: Justice Bharati Dangre, Date: 09 February 2023. Mr. R. R. Vyas, Advocate for the applicant, and Mr. I. A. Fidvi, Advocate for the non‑applicants appeared., The order passed by ... |
id_151 | 0 | Shri Ashish son of Anilkumar Mule, aged about 35 years, occupation Private Service, residing at care of Pradip Raoji Musadwale, behind Reliance Petrol Pump, Bhadech Layout, Buldhana, State of Maharashtra, through Police Station Officer of Gadge Nagar Police Station, Amravati, Tehsil and District Amravati., Dr. Manisha ... |
id_1512 | 0 | (arising out of Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 5973/2014) (arising out of Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 5976/2014) Delay is condoned in view of the reasons expressed in the order disposing of the appeals. Leave granted., The State had registered Crime No. 128/2011 of III Town O.S. Visakhapatnam City in r... |
id_1513 | 0 | First Appeal (Miscellaneous) No. 75 of 2016 Reserved on 30 March 2022 Pronounced on 12 May 2022 Pritam Lal Sahu, son of Shri Ramkumar Sahu, aged about 38 years, caste Teli, resident of Bazarpara, Jairamnagar, Police Station Masturi, Post Jairamnagar, Tahsil Masturi, Civil and Revenue District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh (Ap... |
id_1514 | 0 | Standard Operating Procedure for physical hearing (with hybrid option) before Honourable Supreme Court of India. In continuation of directions already notified regarding functioning of the Supreme Court of India, in the wake of the Covid‑19 pandemic, more particularly through Circulars dated 14 March 2020, 23 March 202... |
id_1515 | 0 | B.A. No.3475 of 2022 Dated this the 22nd day of June, 2022 Apprehending arrest in a non-bailable offence, a cine artist cum producer has approached the High Court of Kerala seeking pre‑arrest bail under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Petitioner alleges that the ingredients of the offences are not ... |
id_1520 | 0 | CRIME NO.703/2022 OF Kozhikode Town Police Station, Kozhikode. Bail Application No. 759 of 2023. Dated this the 8th day of February, 2023. The petitioners, who are accused 1 and 2 in Crime No.703/2022 of Kozhikode Town Police Station, seek anticipatory bail in this matter by resorting to Section 438 of the Code of Crim... |
id_1521 | 0 | CRM-M No.14326 of 2023(O&M) Sukhbir Singh Badal Petitioner Versus State of Punjab Respondent Present: Mr. R.S. Cheema, Senior Advocate with Mr. D.S. Sobti, Advocate, Mr. Shivkartar Singh, Advocate, Mr. Arshdeep Singh Cheema, Advocate, Mr. Tarunam Cheema, Advocate and Mr. Arshdeep Singh Kler, Advocate for the applicant/... |
id_1522 | 0 | Shri Manohar son of Dnyaneshwar Pote, age 27 years, occupation Agriculture; The Collector, Jalna, Taluka and District Jalna; The Gramsevak, Grampanchayat Office Gundewadi, Taluka and District Jalna; Shri Sahebrao son of Balwanta Pote, age 72 years, occupation Agriculture, resident of Gundewadi, Taluka and District Jaln... |
id_1523 | 0 | Through: Dr. Amit Mishra, Advocate versus Respondent. Through: Ms. Hetu Arora Sethi, Assistant Solicitor for GNCTD with Mister Arjun Basra, Advocate for Respondent 1. Mister Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mister Waize Ali Noor, Ms. Kunjala Bhardwaj, Advocates for Respondent 2. CM APPL. 30709/2022 (Exemption) Allowed, subjec... |
id_1524 | 0 | Lyka Labs Limited and another, applicants; The State of Maharashtra and another, respondents; Md. Shoaib and another, petitioners; Devendra Dang, petitioner; Venugopal N. Dhoot, applicant; Shadab Khan, petitioner; Rajiv Kantilal Gogri and another, petitioners; Siddharth Mehta and another, respondents; K. Raghavendra Ra... |
id_1524 | 1 | According to her, the term drawer used in section 148 includes all persons responsible for drawing the dishonoured cheque and includes each and every person held guilty who, at the time of the offence committed, was in charge and was responsible to the company for the conduct of its business. It also includes every per... |
id_1524 | 2 | To consider the submission, the rule laid down in Heydon's case, also known as purposive construction, must be noted. It states that when material words are capable of bearing two or more constructions, the most firmly established rule for the construction of such words applies to all statutes in general, whether penal... |
id_1525 | 0 | Between: Tallapelli Kamalamma and another appellant Tallapelli Jannu Ludia Bloosom Respondent. Counsel for Revision Petitioner: Muralidhar Reddy Katram. Counsel for Respondents: M. Saleem. Cases referred: Second Appeal No. 89 of 2005 decided on 16.03.2023; (2014) 13 Supreme Court Cases 468; (2016) 13 Supreme Court Case... |
id_1526 | 0 | Lt. Col. Prasad Purohit, about 44 years old, serving in the Indian Armed Forces, resident of 76/21, Susmriti, Shantishila Society, Law College Road, Erandawana, Pune-411004, is the appellant (Original Accused No.9). The National Investigation Agency, Ministry of Home Affairs, Shastri Building, New Delhi, is the first r... |
id_1526 | 1 | No question of sanction can arise under Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure unless the act complained of is an offence; the only point for determination is whether it was committed in the discharge of official duty. There must be a reasonable connection between the act and the official duty. It does not matte... |
id_153 | 0 | Before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Mumbai Suburban, New Administrative Building, Third floor, opposite Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Garden, Bandra (East), District Mumbai Suburban 400051. Date of admission 03/05/2014. Judgment dated 17/03/2023. Mr. Kersi J. Divecha, 1402 Hilla Towers, 121 Dr. S.S. Ra... |
id_1531 | 0 | Date: 25/01/2023. Appearance: Learned advocate Mr. Ekrama Qureshi for the appellant and learned advocate Mr. Nishith Acharya for the respondent at length., The present appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, read with Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, preferred by the appellant husband i... |
id_1532 | 0 | State Transfer No. 10 of 2022, CNR No. JKSG010003272022. Date of Institution: 08 March 2022. Date of Judgment: 04 March 2024. Date of Sentence Order: 06 March 2024. In the case of the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir through Police Station Nowhatta, Srinagar, the accused is Sajid Altaf Sheikh (Rather), son of Moham... |
id_1533 | 0 | Criminal Appeal Numbers 1699/2011 – 2, Criminal Appeal Numbers 1699/2011 – 3, Criminal Appeal Numbers 1699 and 1914 of 2011, dated 27 January 2022, Vinod Chandran, Judge., If it is permissible in law to obtain evidence from the accused person by compulsion, why tread the hard path of laborious investigation and prolong... |
id_1533 | 1 | From the disclosure made by A3, Room No.4 in the first floor of K. L. Arcade earlier occupied by A2, Mydanappally Beach, Kannur and the residence of A2 are said to have been discovered., PW45 the Superintendent of Police, National Investigation Agency took over the investigation from the Central Bureau of Criminal Inve... |
id_1533 | 2 | When one of the alleged perpetrators is projected as having made the call to the Collectorate and there were five others involved in planting the bombs, who later converged in a nearby mosque, why Person Witness 1, a casual acquaintance, was involved vexes us to no end. The involvement of Person Witness 1, just to make... |
id_1533 | 3 | On the aspect of corroboration, the prosecution relies on the evidence of Prosecution Witness 10, the Partner of Logistics Solutions where Prosecution Witness 1 was a student, the presence of a black polythene bag spoken of by Prosecution Witnesses 6 to 8, 13 and 47, the evidence of the various witnesses establishing t... |
id_1533 | 4 | The whole thing appears to be an intentional whittling down of the wholesome provisions of Sections 25 and 26 of the Evidence Act. It is very easily said that the incriminating portion of a lengthy confessional statement should be excluded, but it is a very difficult mental process to close your eyes to the details in ... |
id_1534 | 0 | Criminal Appeal Nos. 33/2003, 1301/2002, 1298/2002 and 1297/2002. Judgment reserved on 10 January 2024 and delivered on 16 January 2024. Rajesh Kumar, son of Pandurang Raghorte, aged about 26 years, resident of Kumbhar Para, Dongargarh, Police Station Dongargarh, District Rajnandgaon, Appellant versus State of Chhattis... |
id_1537 | 0 | The present appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 16 February 2015, passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal, Regional Bench, Lucknow, whereby the appeal originally filed by the appellant as a Writ Petition before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad and subsequently transferred to the Armed Forces Tr... |
id_1538 | 0 | Neutral Citation Number: 2023:DHC:3630-DB. Judgment reserved on 01 March 2023 and delivered on 24 May 2023. Writ Petition (Civil) 10486/2021 & Civil Miscellaneous No. 32298/2021; Writ Petition (Civil) 10493/2021 & Civil Miscellaneous No. 15428/2022; Writ Petition (Civil) 10519/2021 & Civil Miscellaneous No. 32389/2021;... |
id_1538 | 1 | It was also stated that he made a statement of fact and opinion on his communication over public media in the matter of the encounter of a terrorist Ishrat Jahan in Gujarat, which had the effect of an adverse criticism of the action of the Central Government and the State Government, capable of embarrassing the relatio... |
id_1538 | 2 | Where there is some evidence which the authority entrusted with the duty to hold the enquiry has accepted and which evidence may reasonably support the conclusion that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, it is not the function of the High Court of India in a petition for a writ under Article 226 to review t... |
id_1539 | 0 | Applicant 1: aged about 50 years, occupation Business, resident of Khat Road, Bhandara, Taluka and District Bhandara. Applicant 2: Abhay, son of Ramesh Bhagwat, aged about 49 years, occupation Business, resident of Ramayan Nagari, Khat Road, Bhandara, Taluka and District Bhandara. Applicant 3: Dr. Gopal, son of Satyana... |
id_1539 | 1 | As was expected only a copy of the institution/summary register maintained by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhiwani was placed before us showing that the appellant on 4-6-1980 was imposed a fine of Rs.20/-. A copy of the treasury challan supporting that the fine paid was deposited by the Chief Judicial Magistrate the ... |
id_1540 | 0 | Appearance: Mr. Kishore Dutta, Learned Advocate General for the State. Respondents: Mr. Dhiraj Trivedi, Learned Deputy Solicitor General; Mrs. Debjani Ray, Advocate; Mr. Samrat Goswami, Advocate; Mr. Ankit Khanna, Advocate; Ms. Swapna Jha, Advocate; Ms. Sohini Dey, Advocate for the Enforcement Directorate; Mr. Ashok Ku... |
id_1540 | 1 | He is an elected representative of the public, holding the highest office in a Zilla Parishad. He was fielded as the candidate at the elections held for the said post by the political party which is the ruling dispensation. Thus, it has become imperative and absolutely necessary for doing complete justice and enforcing... |
id_1541 | 0 | Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No(s). 1959-1963/2024 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 28-11-2023 in Writ Petition No. 33459/2023, Writ Petition No. 33460/2023, Writ Petition No. 33461/2023, Writ Petition No. 33462/2023 and Writ Petition No. 33467/2023 passed by the High Court ... |
id_1542 | 0 | The present Special Leave Petition is being filed under Article 136 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, challenging the final Judgment and Order dated 9 November 2020 passed by the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court in Criminal Application Stamp No. 4278 of 2020 in Criminal Writ Petition Stamp No. 4132 of 20... |
id_1542 | 1 | BECAUSE the Hon'ble Bombay High Court failed to appreciate that while an A‑Summary report which is accepted by the Magistrate by a judicial order is in force and not altered or set aside, the police cannot on their own carry out further investigation in the same case under any provision of law, much less under Section ... |
id_1543 | 0 | The technological age has produced digital platforms that differ from traditional railway platforms where trains are regulated on arrival and departure. These digital platforms can be imminently uncontrollable at times and carry their own challenges. One form of digital platforms are the intermediaries that claim to pr... |
id_1543 | 1 | The three annexures enclosed with the reply were: (a) Terms of Reference of the Committee (Terms of Reference); (b) Sections 18 and 37 of the Government of National Capital Territory Act, 1991 (Government of National Capital Territory Act); and (c) fresh summons issued to Mr. Ajit Mohan (Second Impugned Summons) under ... |
id_1543 | 2 | Section 18 of the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi Act provides the powers, privileges, etc., of members. (1) Subject to the provisions of this Act and to the rules and standing orders regulating the procedure of the Legislative Assembly, there shall be freedom of speech in the Legislative Assembly. (2... |
id_1543 | 3 | In view of the aforesaid fact and the plea that the summons itself was without jurisdiction, it was submitted that the threat of coercive action is itself without jurisdiction and a person need not wait for injury to occur before seeking the Supreme Court of India's protection. Mr. Salve emphasised the importance of th... |
id_1543 | 4 | The State Government and therefore the principle of widest meaning of entries could not result in overlapping powers as that can hardly be conducive to administrative exigencies. That it was so was obvious from the submission of the learned Solicitor General who contended that the doctrine of pith and substance would h... |
id_1543 | 5 | It could at best make a recommendation which would have to be examined by the House through the process of a privileges committee. This was a routine part of every summon, only indicative of the power of the Parliament or Assembly. Mister Tushar Mehta, learned Solicitor General sought to advance submissions substantial... |
id_1543 | 6 | The judgment in Amarinder Singh is of little assistance to the petitioner as that was a case of an executive act of exemption of land, and in no way obstructed or threatened the integrity of the legislative proceedings. The facts of each case are important and propositions of law must apply in the context of the facts.... |
id_1543 | 7 | The moot point is whether the expression peace and harmony can be read in as expanded a manner as Doctor Dhavan seeks to do by relying on a number of entries in List II and List III. We have no doubt that peace and harmony, whether in the National Capital or in a State context, is of great importance. But it would be t... |
id_1544 | 0 | Sri M Veerabhadraiah, learned counsel for the petitioner appeared in person. Counsel submitted that he has objection to the Caveat Petition. Submission is noted. The petitioner is directed to file an affidavit regarding objections to the Caveat Petition. The matter is listed on 11 July 2022., Sri M Veerabhadraiah, lear... |
id_1545 | 0 | District – Patna. Sunil Bhardwaj versus Sunil Kumar, Petitioner(s) versus Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Patna Zonal Office, Bank Road, Chandpura Place, Patna‑800001, Bihar. Email: edgoi-patna-bih@nic.in. Telephone: 91‑612‑2219444. Appearances: For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Lokesh Kumar Singh, Advocate; Mr. ... |
id_1546 | 0 | Ganesh Shankar Pilane, age 20 years, occupation Student, residing at Sr. No. 20/1, Punyayi Nagar, Warna Building, Flat No. 7/6, Dhaneshwar Colony, opposite K.K. Market, Dhankawadi, Pune (now present at Yerwada Central Prison) is the petitioner. The State of Maharashtra, through Bharati Vidyapeeth Police Station, Pune C... |
id_1547 | 0 | Leave granted. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. We are amazed to see the order passed by the learned Single Judge of the Allahabad High Court. The respondents herein (applicants before the Allahabad High Court) had filed an application for grant of anticipatory bail. The application was vehemently oppos... |
id_1548 | 0 | CRM-M-23524-2021 and Present: Mr. Randeep Surjewala, Advocate with Mr. R. Kartikeya, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Deepak Sabherwal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. The matter is taken up for hearing through video conference due to COVID-19 situation., These two petitions are filed by Dalbir seeking regular b... |
id_1549 | 0 | Date of Decision: 21 March 2022. Petitioner: Puran Chand Sharma. Respondent: State of Haryana. Present: Mr. S. S. Dinarpur, Advocate for the petitioner; Mr. Bhupender Singh, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana., Puran Chand Sharma has filed this petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code to challenge the or... |
id_155 | 0 | W.P.(C) 4848/2020 Page 1 of 6. This hearing is conducted through video conferencing. Court fees be filed within two weeks., This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking an appropriate direction to quash the Common Law Admission Test 2020 examination notification issued by respondent No.1 in so far as it mandat... |
id_1552 | 0 | Criminal Appeal No. 2400 of 2006 dated the 13th day of June 2022. This appeal is filed by the accused in Section No. 106/2002 on the file of the Additional Sessions Judge (Adhoc) II, Thodupuzha. The above case is charge‑sheeted by the Circle Inspector of Police, Thodupuzha, against the appellants alleging offences puni... |
id_1552 | 1 | Regina v. Mendez and another [2010 (England and Wales Court of Appeal) Criminal 516] the England and Wales Court of Appeal observed: In case of joint enterprise liability for murder where the common purpose was not to kill but to cause serious bodily harm, D was not liable for the murder of V if the direct cause of V’s... |
id_1553 | 0 | Will the Minister of Law and Justice be pleased to state: (a) whether the Supreme Court recently expressed its opinion over delay in notifying the names of judges recommended by the collegium; (b) number of collegium proposals pending with Government as on date and the reasons for delay; (c) number of collegium proposa... |
id_1554 | 0 | FAM No. 237 of 2019 Judgment Reserved On: 19.09.2023 Judgment Delivered On: 25.09.2023 Versus Nandg Sil Naw, District Bilaspur. For Appellant: Shri Ritesh Giri, Advocate. For Respondent: Ms. Nirupama Bajpai, Advocate. Honourable Shri Goutam Bhaduri & Honourable Shri Deepak Kumar Tiwari, Judges. The following judgment o... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.