monology/jigsaw · Datasets at Hugging Face

comment_text stringlengths 6 5k	toxic class label 2 classes	severe_toxic class label 2 classes	obscene class label 2 classes	threat class label 2 classes	insult class label 2 classes	identity_hate class label 2 classes
Protecting 'Causes of the 1948 Palestinian exodus' Hi, Can you explain on its talk page why you protected this article? There is some edit warring going on, but not very heavy (for the standards of this article). Also I am a participant in a mediation case, but that concerns actually only the use of one source on this page, and is irrelevant to the present edit warring. Therefore I was wondering about your motivation. Regards,	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Hello, I check this personal page very often. Please leave messages here on on the discussion page. Tks. Marvio	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" My thanks to you for this. I note that I am being dressed down for everything from being nice to editors I like to work with, all the way to deleting messy posts from my own talk page. Well, a mess is a mess. Again, thanks Stephen. Please don't take that as gratuitous or ingratiating -).... imacowboy "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
I don't care what you say here. I don't believe one sentence anymore.	1true	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Anytime you want a nightcap, tell me.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
2010 Meet a Local - Vietnam TV Series, Factual / Documentary, 60mins 2010 Meet a Local - Spain TV Series, Factual / Documentary, 60mins 2009 Meet a Local - Tasmania TV Series, Factual / Documentary, 60mins 2009 Meet a Local - Ireland TV Series, Factual / Documentary, 60mins 2008 The Way - Camino de Santiago Feature, Factual / Documentary, 75mins 2008 African Stories Online, Factual / Documentary, 20mins, Overlander Multimedia for the ABC 2006 The Outback Boxing Troupe Online, Factual / Documentary, 30mins, Overlander Multimedia for the ABC, Australia, Production Company 2004 Returning Home - A Story of Ararat Online, Factual / Documentary, 20mins, Overlander Multimedia for the ABC 2001 Meet a Local - East Coast Australia TV Series, Factual / Documentary, 60mins 2001 Meet a Local - Outback Australia TV Series, Factual / Documentary, 60mins	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Globalization and 'Ivytrash' I am not Ivy anything. That was my home. I was born and raised 6 blocks from Harvard Square, and it was (once) the greatest place in this country. I am not interested in 'globalization'. I look at the square and see the smoking ruin of my home. When this happens to you, I hope globalization is comfort enough for you.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
He is, self-confessed , and approved by my observations (see, e.g., history of Soviet partisan). BTW, you're the first to object ).	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
And btw, speaking of the Armenian genocide, if we are to follow wikipedia conventions of most common name (and I don't agree Assyrian is the most common name as we also have proven many times before) we should change the name of the current article Assyrian genocide to Seyfo.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" To quote - If a Wikipedia article links to this page, it is because someone is concerned that the article contains inaccurate statement(s). Such statements are followed by the following warnings: ""(dubious - discuss)"". The accuracy of a statement may be a cause for concern if: * It contains unlikely information, without providing references. * It contains information which is particularly difficult to verify. Please DO NOT remove my dubious reference edits as that would be against the guidelines there, wouldn't it?"	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Belarus a developed country Hahaha, nothing more to say 82.209.225.33	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Censorship on Islamist Terrorism Try not being a censor monger. Properly cited information should not be deleted.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
If you would like to write an article of Bill's father, including his rise to CEO of Commonwealth Edison, feel free. This article is about Bill. We're not writing a chatty, book-lenth biography about him, but stating facts - same as other biographical articles in Wikipedia. The details of his father's career are irrelevant, although his (eventual) stature as CEO is not. This is yet another issue that has already been resolved.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Thanks! Really cool tool for purposes like what I have on my userpage. Best, Tally-ho! "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
It is funny because i would say exactly the same thing for you Astarti34 , the anonymous user with an ip from greece and the user WilliamThweatt . Accusing people , without a reason is not allowed in wikipedia . As per wikipedia rules you are free to ask for an investigation ! In fact i do kindly ask you to do so . If this vandalism persists i will seek an arbitration . I do kindly ask from any moderator , to see all the reverts , and i am confident that they will conclude that they have been mal intentioned , with a clear nationalistic agenda ... you all 3 guys have something in common , you are all greek * all 3 of you * ! ( )	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" =^_^= I just watched the entire series, and I agree, this entire article and several other in the suzumiya haruhi articles are all from a ""somebody who knows haruhi personally"" sort of view. So Im going to fix it. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Agreed, will take a stab at it. It also needs major formatting cleanup and Wikifying, it sounds too much like a fan conversation - the references are all either YouTube links or ""personal communications"". I'm trying to at least pare down the ""BEST MUSICIAN EVER!"" statements, could use some help with the discography section too. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Vandalism is for e.g. this type of edit, somebody said that The Stig was leaving so I reverted it, basically I reverted it because there was no source to suggest that he was leaving, so I do know what vandalism is I just want to carry on editing Wiki, I love this place it's amazing please don't ""make me leave"", now that I've explained myself please please unblock me ( Thanks —123 "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Baer didnt invent video games. This is jewish propaganda supported by a wiki troll named, ""Goldberg"" Go figure. Hey, ""goldberg"", try educating yourself. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EfBwz_SiK8s"	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
I can tell you what the argument is about here newseventsguy. It's about YOUR retroactive reversion of a simple edit trying to include secondary independent verification of sedimentary nanodiamonds in Younger Dryas sediments by Bement and Madden et al., WITHOUT DISCUSSION a reference that I notice has NOT YET been included in the reference list still, after all this time. This is after you ADMIT that you are ignorant of the peer review literature and the controversy. Any attempt to do simple reference list edits on this page have been stomped by no less that five admittedly biased and ignorant editors. The honorable thing to do here would be to recuse yourself from editing the page, as I have. But I haven't seen that happening until now. Good luck with it, you've already made complete fools of yourselves.	1true	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
HELLO HOW DO I GET SOMEBODY TO FIX SHIT AROUND HERE?	1true	0false	1true	0false	0false	0false
Dictionaries How dare you call my contribution spam!!! I am a Kurd and I made a lsit of kurdish dictionaries. you bloody turkish nationalist and atoricity commiting bone breaking Nazi. watch out folk this slimy Turk is trying to censor the internet this is not undemocratic Turkey here, no prison cells in wikipedia you stupid Turk! And you buggers want membership to the EEC	1true	0false	1true	0false	1true	1true
" Apparently, other editors agree that the edits I made were justified. A group of meat-puppets working as a team to revert an article to their own POV is what has caused this block. At issue was the ""advert"" tag which is justified, was placed on the article by one editor, replaced by me, replaced again by another editor, and replaced again by me. Three editors, so far, have indicated the tag belongs there. I'm sure a forth editor is going to weigh in on this side too. The article is riddled with brochure language. Please note that I was removing brochure language right up to the lock-up of the article. There's still lots more in there that needs to come out before the advert tag should be removed. Additionally, I don't believe I broke the 3RR rule which requires a fourth reversion. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
While I agree that Indus valley civilisation is the correct name for the civilisation, the passage quoted above is not neccecarily factual in terms of saying Second there is no proof at all that the mighty Sarasvati of the Rigveda was in fact this (now dry) river- the identification is itself open to doubt.. Apart from there being facts/proof to indicate that Saraswati did exist as this dry river ( including geological facts as to why it dried up) The evidence also points to the fact that it was NOT a tributary of the Indus, ( refuting point 3 of the passage quoted above ) and in fact drew the waters of the Sutlej and the Yamuna to be a river system of it's own. And though a large number of sites have been found along this river system, none of them are of the scale of Harrapa / Mohenjodaro, leaving the Indus Valley tag as the correct one. Saraswati did exist,today the timing is disputed and not the existence, Wheter it is vedic and indic vs Harrapan and non vedic is more disputed today than it's existence.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" December 2015 (UTC) Thanks. I have started working on Pranagnihotra Upanishad but I am unable to get the full text from the Deussen's Sixty Upanishads (pages 646-648 do not appear in the book under Google url}. Can you suggest a url which gives the full text? In the meanwhile I have completed this short article Sharabha Upanishad which you may like to see and add/edit. Nvvchar. 01:52, 3"	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
I insulted people on en.wiki with criteria to provoke my filter set. You are simply abusing the power people handed over.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Excellent! That would be great. The comments found at its peer review should also be very helpful, but I haven't had any time to actually act upon those suggestions. Cheers. —Hello! "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
How do you know he is dead. Its just his plane that crashed. Jeezz, quit busting his nuts, folks.	0false	0false	1true	0false	0false	0false
" Afican Union site vandalism Dear BracketBot, I wrote this note to inform you that an editor is performing acts of vandalism in the website of the ""African Union"" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_Union. Please I would appreciate if you could tell me who I should report this action?, the Board Index name is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Knisfo "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
You are a know it all.....Jimbo! Why don't you get a life instead of sitting in front of your computer all day. The high priestess of knowledge, indeed!	1true	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" All of those statements need to be referenced. Leaving an article unreferenced in every section opens the door for original research and the introduction for factually inaccurate information. To point out one thing, I'll bring up Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012. First, it has a number of tags on it, the creation of articles that need to be tagged should be reason number 1 to remove the flag. Second, the only reference/link provided on the article is this one while the information is from various subpages of that. It appears that the entirety of the article is found at this deeper link. It's possible that some came from this as well, I can't tell. I'll also note that the style of the summary it was taken from was never meant to be encyclopedic, so the article is riddled with grammatical errors, mostly incomplete sentences. On creation, the opening read ""Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012 (H.R. 2055) is a bill passed to the 112th United States Congress"" I've never heard this usage (to rather than by) and assume it is incorrect, another editor changed it, the lead is also missing an important determiner. In any case, you can take a look at Vesey "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Ok, I just ask. For your experience, what you think about the portal?	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Sitush, how can anyone assume good faith when you have been writing so much against Yadavs on that page.It is evident from the discussions, how conveniently you have been selecting sources for negatives and then conveniently rejecting the same sources for the positives. You are the only person spamming on that article and vandalizing it. Yes, I will contribute to other articles on Wiki too, but let me first correct things on Yadav as so much wrong has been going on there.You got Ikonoblast banned and now you have got me banned and you will get anyone banned you differs from your biased stand on Yadavs but I am not going to give up.I will follow all WP policies and will ensure that I get things corrected on Yadav and dont let your and fowlers personal views dominate that page.Peace !!	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
", 30 December 2009 (UTC) Don't worry, I told you I had your back, and I'll continue to defend ya. ;) Yup, we got our proof of work. When I first saw it, I was like 'That's no reliable source', cause I remember you reverted that source one time. But, when I looked over the article and saw Ref. 63 I was like 'Oh shit', so I reverted it. I'm glad you went ""going back"". ;) I'm glad my ""two words"" have gone on to ""save"" me. Question: Would you like for me to expand leads on all SS members? (Hit 21:31"	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
November 2014 (UTC) I agree with . Clearly Santilak is using up his usual bag of tricks. SantiLak, please discuss the article courteously and professionally. 2.177.207.221 08:38, 28	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Ok, I like the pyx lax track very much indeed. If you could point me towards other greek trad music, that would be great, and greawt for me. Here are some Irish - , . Non visto ... Provvedi "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
where's with pitchforks already? 17:09, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Again reinstated sentence about 7 Nobels in the first paragraph, for the reason stated above. If others disagree that this is a defining characteristic of Bx Science that should be indicated right up front in the summary paragraphs, then can we discuss it here rather than playing edit games by removing text without either edit summaries or discussion on the talk page?	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
I'm disappointed it wasn't a successful run, but it	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Elvis... Crying in the Chapel Feudalist "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Fisting. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. tlka	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Elizabeth Hi lil romeo I am one of your biggest fans I really like you I always dream of you at night I would like you to come to Dallas Tx. to Ignacio Zaragoza and give a concert at this Elementary school I am in the 6th grade and I am 15 years old I want you to come and help me with my homework See you later I will write to you soon By	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Hi Fracophonie, Thanks for taking the time to write such a long message - I appreciate this. In terms of what I said about the age - I didn't mean to cause offense. I thought I read somewhere that you had to be over 18 to make these decisions but I think I was getting confused with the check user privileges. I have already read some of those policies but will read the rest later today. I am not a troll - I just need time to get used to all these acronyms, policies etc. From what started out with me writing an article about my favourite website has turned into a massive thing which was not what I was expecting. I really don't have any more time to argue and debate with the usrs since its clear they just want it deleted despite what I have said. For example one user just wrote there is another site called Amirite.net. This is Amirite.com!! This is precisely why I had to keep responding on the AFC delete page. In terms of the rest I agree to do them (of course I can only apologise once I am unblocked) - can you apologise for me? On a side note I am actually French and Jewish (shame about the gay part though:)	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Welcome! Hello, Soundchu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page and How to develop articles How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish) Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! WikHead	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
I removed the content, after it was tagged as uncited by Mattisse. If every commonly known fact need a cite because some editor-en passent wants to nominate for FARC, then it appears we have a problem. I very much suspect Mattisse's motives here, but frankly, I am too tired of her to be bothered to explore them. Perhaps one of her probabtionary mentors, more interested in her than I, would care to deal with this.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Is Jeff Garcia gay or not?	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
That wouldn't be sufficient; you need explicit permission to use text copyrighted by someone else under a licence suitable for Wikipedia. Please read the guide to requesting and formalizing permission to use copyrighted works on Wikipedia. Note that, in addition to copyright requirements, the article must still comply with notability guidelines, advertising prohibition and avoid conflicts of interest. — (talk)	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
The section is useful info and should stay - you are clearly wrong.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Comment So now we are stuck with a week of 200+ broken links. Since you acknowledge that the move was a mistake and not uncontroversial, will you please revert it? If anyone wants to dispute that the opera is the primary topic, they can do so under a proper requested move discussion, as they should have done in the first place. If you are not willing or able to do this today, I'll ask a another administrator to do it.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" It needs to be included, in the context of 1993 as well. I'll try and dig up some sources. User Talk Review me! "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
":::::::::: Tim, firstly I appreciate you taking the time to discuss this issue offline, and for your willingness to debate it at length here despite the majority view here being in your favour. Yes I certainly agree with your friend that it is very important to describe the jurisidictions that a firm is present in, there is clearly a massive diffence between, say having offices in the French or Japanese jurisdictions, or between the Chinese and U.S. jurisdictions, since the legal and regulatory systems are very different, as well as the commercial characteristics of the markets. Beyond that however it remains my firm view that there is a big difference between a law firm having an office in, say, Paris or Toulouse, even though they are both in the same jurisdiction. I appreciate that the situation in the U.S. is slightly more complex since you have both federal and state jurisdictions. Even within each state there will be big differences between the legal markets in different cities though. To give an example, the San Jose market will be not just a lot smaller overall than the Los Angeles market, but it will also have a quite different profile - on the whole a lot more specialist, niche and focused on high tech. To give another example, in the UK a law firm could never be regarded as being truly top tier if it didn't have an office in London, even if it had offices in every other big city. In fact all of the very top tier UK firms (DLA Piper is not yet regarded as one of them, despite its size) have just one UK office, in London, although they have other offices overseas. Saying that DLA has "" has 69 offices across the United States, Egypt, South Africa, Kenya, Thailand, China, ..."" would in my view still mean a loss of valuable information to the reader. We could fall back on using descriptions like ""in major financial centres"" or ""in major commercial centres"" or ""in a combination of major financial centres and major commercial centres"" but then we are introducing what is in my view an unnecesssary element of vagueness, imprecision and even original research. I do accept that DLA, with 69 offices, is right on the borderline of having too many offices to make it practical to list all of them in the article. However I do also feel that there is an important general point of principal that information about the office locations of a law firm is very valuable information to aid the reader of an article in understanding the subject of it, and should be included as much as possible. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
No problem with that at all! If you don't think that there is a problem with someone siting that I have a mistress then it just proves my point as to how far this site is to being an actual encyclopedia. It's a forum, not an encyclopedia. Big difference. And that's not even what pisses me off the most about my page. Thank god I'm single with no chick bitching me out or that would be another attorney fee I'd be handing out to sue whoever owns this site. I'm done bitching about the mistress thing. My whole page has errors from the very first line down to the very last line, and that is no joke!! First line and the last line are wrong.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Sprecher Brewery I took the tour this christmas when visiting my sister. We were charged an extra $1 for the glass. Their website may not be updated but that IS the current pricing.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
iPad talk page Why did you remove that IP's edit to the talk page? It wasn't spam...	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Speedy deletion of Andrew takao A tag has been placed on Andrew takao requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Image Image deletion warning Image:Metroid Prime Hunter title screen, top display.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion. 16:31, August 31, 2005 (UTC)"	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
The real personal attacks are the repeated undoing of my edits by everyone else.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Nope, I didn't read the guide to appealing, didn't have time. The user in question IS engaged in harassment, I've been doing this long enough to know and I can prove it. He/she immediately placed a threatening notice of blocking me permanently on my user page, reverted the article while I was in the midst of editing it (my second pass, couldn't even preview changes), then changed his/her mind as to my real wiki-sin, since the onus for proving the Doris Day available as PD on archive.org was on him/her not me and the usual span for pre-Bern had expired long ago, ... decided my REAL sin was Original Research (oh noes), and continued to revert based on that. Does OR add clutter? Sure it can, but if the user in question was REALLY concerned about that, about the quality of the article and about extraneous details, WHY DIDN'T HE/SHE EVEN NOTICE two paragraphs already there, comprising about 1/3 of the entire article, dealt with Norman Schwarzkopf, an unrelated book and an unrelated ice cream store name? I'll tell you why: the user wasn't engaged in good-faith/goodwill editing and the normal back-and-forth that leads to better articles. He/she was involved in blocking input to the article. Why? Was it personal against me, or was it to preserve the existing content of the article, including the false claims and extraneous material not even concerned with ther subject at hand? I can only speculate, but I'd guess it's some sort of power trip and wiki-bullying. I don't really have time for this. I have made a fair number of very good edits over the years and have usually refrained from saying anything that isn't directly related to content and improving articles. I could pretend this user didn't do what he/she did, but I'm wasting my own time here and I don't really have a stake in any such pretense. I don't have any stake in improving this article either, no dog in the race, I just see how it can be improved and made more informative. As a long-term wikipedia user and editor, I don't see any problem in jumping in and fixing something. I almost expect some sort of pushback now, but not over completely minor edits which are very good and on-target in very minor stub-like articles. The problem isn't me here, it's that if people such as the user in question can get away with this sort of behavior, and they are getting away with it, wikipedia becomes a much poorer place, a playground filled with bullies rather than a library where we can all learn and share. Also, I don't recal ever having called him/her a bot, I think you put those words in my mouth, perhaps inadvertently. His/her behavior is malicious, but probably not malware, just the normal human collection of problems. I think this user should be warned against trying to be a gatekeeper, he/she isn't quite qualified for that at this point anyway, and it's having a very chilling effect across wikipedia. I won't egnage in a battle of the wikipedia rule acronyms, I will continue to write in English, and to read articles on wikipedia in English, and to think of ways to improve them in English. I am fully aware of how the terms ""vandlism"" are used and misused here, and most of the rest of the wikijargon. Nothing new under the sun here. If you read the edits I made carefully, and note the times of the reverts and the history of actions by that other user, you will see I'm not off the mark here at all. I know what's going on. I don't know why, but I don't have to, and I expect the motivations aren't interesting. Respond if you have anything to say. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
the communist states == all three call themselves as the socialist states. communist is the word that westerner use. so should that name be changed? ==	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Boze Hadleigh, a journalist, interviewer and writer primarily of gossip about homosexuals of Hollywood.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" ""IMDb content is user-submitted and often subject to incorrect speculation and rumor. The use of the IMDb on Wikipedia for referencing is considered unacceptable and strongly discouraged.""Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Resources ""...self-published media...are largely not acceptable. This includes any website whose content is largely user-generated, including the Internet Movie Database (IMDB)...""WP:USERG As I've said, this is a long-standing consensus. If you disagree, I encourage you to take it up at Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard. - "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
I'm new to this means of communicating ... and I am not sure that I expressing this in the right form. However, I am reviewing all of the recent (2000-2008) MA nominations (expected to go on the web in the next couple of months). In the process I have developed a database of corrected lat/long (decimal degrees), based on Google Earth and photos and assessors maps in the nomination files. I would like to share this, if there is a way of doing it. Alternatively, to find a way to EASILY check and correct existing coordinates on the Mass Wiki Lists. Would this be useful for anyone?	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Y2kgtp actually reverted the vandalism, I did not.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Yes, I have read them both, and I will now ask you to provide back-up for your story. Not that it matters in the least, the one religion is as bad as the other. But you better have some proof for your claims. ChatNoir	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
I think the error is that it is grams not kilograms. So 1.5 kg. I'm editing the article til we have a better result. If I'm wrong please change it back. 23:10, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Vince - FYI 'Yellowfrogs' is (Longdendale) Councillor Sean Parker Perry, a frequent purveyor of 'Greenwash' and four square behind the destruction of Swallows Wood via his support for the bypass. He is vigourously re-editing the wikpedia pages on the Longdendale Bypass, his own and Roy Oldham's page in order to boost his fake 'green' credentials and obfuscate the neutrality of these articles. He gets nasty if he gets pissed off (threatens spurious legal action), but fortunately, he's legally illiterate, so don't be put off.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Summary of situation User:ShimShem has taken a dislike to this article, and has tried numerous methods to either get it deleted or its name changed. 1) Completely invalid speedy deletion request 2) Invalid DRV request 3) Nominated for deletion via AfD, despite the fact that it had passed an AfD this year - in fact the AfD was withdrawn at 6-0 for Keep The current AFD here stands at 9-0 for Keep, but despite that, ShimShem has wikilawyered all the way through it - once it became clear that it was going to be kept, they decided a name change would be better... 4) Changed the name of the band in the article, and was told to take it to talk After a brief non-discussion on talk, moved the article anyway, and was reverted I was originally unsure of the motives of this editor - why they were completely desperate to delete or move this article - until I noted they were interested in Tamil subjects, one of which is M.I.A. (artist), and guessed that they believed that the two could be confused. Their subsequent creation of the article M I A as a redirect to M.I.A. (artist) proved this, as far as I am concerned. As to whether the band is actually called MIA or M.I.A., it differs. The band itself uses M.I.A. as the heading on their own website, but then uses a combination of both elsewhere. Since in the case of most sources, this is only likely to be laziness (much as R.E.M. are regularly referred to as REM), and since the article has existed here for a while, and that all the backlinks go to this version, and most of all because we shouldn't let disruptive users get their way, the article should stay here.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" It is unnecessairy source, because it does not matter how many soldiers were killed. What matters is that the Safavids were deposed. Besides that, mentioning that information WITHOUT making any remarks about the brutality of the Afghan forces - for example the complete massacre of the Safavid family (including women and children), as well as the massacres on the civilian population in Isfahan, Bam, and villages of Khorasan - is considered POV. Besides that, you have not shown any sources for your claim that ""30000-100000 soldiers were killed"". And as for the edits: it does not matter what YOU believe, it only matters what the Wikipedia rules are. You posted a message without editting ANYTHING ... that's the same as abusing the article's history as a message-board. Use the REAL message-board instead. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Whoever wrote the Plot I feel terrible for whoever had to watch the movie in detail and then write the plot line. Who ever took their time to write the plot section must be traumatized for life. However, its missing the part where Milo's son is laying on his belly unconscious on a bed, Milo anally rapes him while several masked men watch. Also, there's some use of a knife/sword in this scene. This is truly one sick film. No, there is no artistic message. This film is basicly a middle finger by the sick-minded film makers. The cast must have been tricked into participating in this disgusting film. There's artistic gore such as the classic film Begotten and then there's this . . . Listen to me, DON'T WATCH THIS FILM NO MATTER HOW MUCH YOU ARE TEMPTED!	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" As he has asked admins not to comment, I will refrain from doing so. I did however remove a personal attack against him; if anyone wishes to discuss this action, please email me. &Windows; "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Can we compromise here? I don't think we have the budget for salmon, but (at least in the Netherlands) there is an ""in-between"" fish, more affordable, that in Dutch was called ""salmon trout."" So far, so good, S Marshall. Fortunately no one has yet discovered that you used to run drugs for a cartel or that you danced in a nightclub a la...Henry LaFarge, was it? in A Shot in the Dark? Ssshh, I'm not telling. Oh, I should ask you at your RfA about the proper use of citation templates. Later! "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Sorry, I am not sure how to take care of him. He has quite the history, and actually has legal cases involving the Dayton Daily News. Wikipedia is at risk if he edits any of those pages or any affiliated company. The actual sockpuppet is 65.31.33.93, which is a puppet of hdayejr.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
We can agree to disagree on the relative merits of the fish and the character, but the red seabream is part of family Sparidae anyway. So that's usage outside North America right there.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Large ships are typically launched into the water when the hulls are completed, but that doesn't mean all of the construction work is finished. Usually, there is still a significant amount of work to be done, including finishing the interior of the ship, building the superstructure, etc. Take a look at Image:SMS Seydliz under construction.jpg, for example; you can see the ship is already in the water, but a significant amount of work is being done to the superstructure. You can also read Ship naming and launching for more information about launching. Hope that helps.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
(...at which point I am predictably ignored and stonewalled, which seems to be the Wikipedia staff's official response to any direct questioning on the Justin Berry issue. One might think they've hired Scott McClellan to handle their PR. Clearly they are aware of the untenability of their position, and they're really hoping it will just go away. Sorry guys, it won't.)	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
You need to prove notability using reliable sources. Just because it has some festivities (how large are they? who organized them?) in part of a country doesn't make it notable. Also, you need to change your username; this one will probably be blocked soon for violating the username policy (no names of web sites/businesses). (talk to me)	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
4meter4's sigh and my concerns Only because Mr 4meter4 had reverted any of contributions of mine given to this article so far I did not have a single chance to develop it. His article called ¨falsetto¨ is not about falsetto. It may be about his arrogance, who knows. There are a huge contraries regarding only the definition of falsetto. There are many signs of entirely different falsetto compare those info which Mr 4meter4 such anxiously protects. In England, Italy or Spain 16th century were described entirely different types of falsettos. On the top of it, Mr 4meter4 perhaps never heard Pavarotti singing falsetto, or the falsetto of Ian Gillan. Singing of King Diamond is based on falsetto. What about Michael Kiske? Is it not falsetto? Mariah Carey or Whitney Houston do (did) not sing falsetto? Does any of these falsettos sound breathy? Not to me. Isn't out there published a note about those? Maybe only because 4meter4 does not look for it. Why? It would not fit to his article. He would have to admit that his ONLY source Vennard was probably having in the chair something else than falsetto or he was drunk. 4meter4 quickly opened two or three books and things he had swallowed the World. The whole physiology of his ¨only¨ falsetto is based on encyclopedia? Well, perhaps it is enough for Wikipedia or himself. But not for me. No. There is much more out there only regarding physiology. Much much more. And just because you allow idiots like 4meter4 to ¨develop¨ Wikipedia, the people, the readers of Wikipedia will read shit. Where are any proves of the research regarding female falsetto at 60ies, Mr Know Everything? Feel free to block me again. I have no desire to write here any more.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
You've also forgotten these Premier Leagues.... But still written in English.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! talk "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
What a motherfucking piece of crap those fuckheads for blocking us!	1true	1true	1true	0false	1true	0false
" 2010 (UTC) That's because when I made those tables, I classed everyone as ""independent"" unless I could confirm their party identification. According to this, the DLP intended to run in all 17 constituencies. According to this they had at least 5 candidates. I've only been able to identify two so far, so we do need to identify more. 03:19, 1 December"	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Removed POV I removed undo criticism of Secretary Boutwell and POV. Wikipedia is not meant to bash persons reputations whether alive or dead. The following has been removed from the article. ""Boutwell did little to withdraw paper currency from circulation, shaping his financial policy to forestall either inflation or deflation. Intellectual critics saw in these actions a want of guiding principle and a lack of solid theoretical knowledge. ""He believed in knowledge just so far as it was convenient for him to justify his own theory that knowledge was a deception,"" Henry Adams wrote in a much-quoted analysis in 1870. ""He believed in common schools, and not in political science; in ledgers and cash-books, but not in Adam Smith or Mill; as one might believe in the multiplication-table, but not in Laplace or Newton. By a natural logic he made of his disbelief in the higher branches of political science a basis for his political practice, and thus grounding action on ignorance he carried out his principle to its remotest conclusions.""Henry Adams, ""The Session,"" North American Review, July, 1870, p. 36. But in a very corrupt time, it spoke well of Boutwell that nobody thought that he made money out of his Cabinet post, either for himself or his friends. Living within his salary, he lodged in a boarding-house throughout his tenure. His only pleasures lay in writing lectures and playing billiards or poker though never for money. Chicago Times, March 6, 1875. ""He is an inaccessible man, uninfluenced by fear, favor, affection or hope of reward, and does not burst out into brillian exhibitions of love or hatred,"" a New England politician wrote his brother. Henry F. French to Benjamin B. French, March 16, 1869, Benjamin B. French Papers, Library of Congress. ""Boutwell's financial policy was less dogmatic than pragmatic.""Liberal reformers had hoped that he would embrace civil service reform and rush the country towards the resumption of specie payments; but while Boutwell appointed subordinates on the basis of merit for the most part, , he did little to rein in the spoils system outside of Washington, remaining on friendly terms with the party bosses.''"" "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
You sir are an imbecile, and a pervert.	1true	0false	0false	0false	1true	0false
recaptcha 1 it isn't defamatory 2 it relates to a computer system not a living person ReCAPTCHA forces users to solve the Captcha to access whatever the service in question is. Forced labor is the definition slave labor, i am going to revert your reversion, please do not do it again or i will report you for vandalism also please don't send me threatening messages tia 94.168.204.89	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Question on Possible Citation I'm sorry if I missed your question - I don't pay much attention to that page. In response to your question, let me start by repeating my boilerplate formulation: The job of Wikipedia editors is to verifiably summarize reliable sources using the neutral point of view. (I haven't yet worked in ""no original research"".) WP:NOR says that we mustn't integrate otherwise reliable information to arrive at novel conclusions. Comparing two lists and drawing conclusions from their differences and similarities is most likely original research. We can integrate information, so long as we don't arrive at new theories. Another principle to remember is that vagueness improves accuracy. The more precise we are the harder it is to be accurate. Getting down to details, the Predators and Editors website appears to be a reliable source so we can use it as a source. The Bauer site, even if somewhat unreliable, may be used in a limited fashion as a primary source about Bauer. I'm not familiar enough with this topic to make pronouncements on what would be correct. However I would say that your proposed text appears reasonable. The sources are sufficient, and no original conclusions are made. The website takedown issue is confusing to me, but you should be able to summarize what you find in reliable sources. Overall, my opinion is that the less we say about the subject the better. Attack articles are not encouraged. While we must show our subjects ""warts and all"" we shouldn't enlarge the warts, nor ignore their better features. Balance is a part of NPOV. - ""but you should be able to summarize what you find in reliable sources."" There no reliable sources only a he said she said blog flame war. It is alleged the website takdown was instigated by Bauer. It isn't clear if she did, and other factors between the forum and the IP are not known. It was the root cause of this article and all the players here were involved via these blogs. I don't see how that can be objective. Bauer I'm sorry I did not get back to you about the Usenet stuff et al., but I've been somewhat overloaded at work. Personally, I think the article is better now than when I first saw it, thanks to a lot of effort on the part of the primary editors of the article to bring the best sources and present them in a way that doesn't seem like a lynch mob. Y'all are doing a good job, and there should be enough editors on either side to ensure that something resembling nuetral gets posted . I'm glad to help and try and make the article neater, and I don't mean to sound brusque in the summary field, but there was a lot to cram in there. Thanks for the note, I appreciate it! I would say Karen saying I've called her names is an out and out fabrication. I've never done any such thing. ""or whether it's because he's been able to insult me and call me names on Wikipedia, repeatedly and without consequences"" I've accused her and Jule of carrying the water for TNH and Absolutewrite and they have. That isn't namecalling by a long stretch. I'm really weary of these attacks over this. This is mob rule. While avi seems genuine, she's hanging with a tough insulting tribe. The threats against me are real and escalating by the hour. Blaming me won't make my points any less valid. Nobody likes to be piled on by a crowd. It's the Internet equivalent of stoning. This is not a fabrication. I get awfully tired of being called a troll, or part of a mob or cult or ""group troll,"" or a ""self-interested partisan,"" or a ""blog comment commando,"" or other things I could point at if I wanted to depress myself. You also made a ""theoretical"" comment about me being ""nosy, fat and ugly."" Putting the word ""if"" in front of it doesn't make it any less of an insult. I've tried to be polite to you, and will continue to do so, but this is the response. And, please notice, like abi (Avi is Avraham the admin, abi the ML commenter who believes in kindness) I counseled against piling on. \| Talk \| contribs Those are not ad hominem names Karen. Yet you've linked to a thread where you and Teresa caled me a psycho. You should hear what she said in private when I asked NOT to be spoken of negatively in threads on Making Light. It's obvious you two are pro-TNH and absolutewrite. That's self-interest and backed up by the fact that you run to her for counseling. Well, avi can make her own decisons about it then can't sh	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Infobox hurricane season It's pretty much complete. I need to make some documentation, and possibly tweak things that may pop up. You might want to test it out, so if there are questions or suggestions, I can go ahead and address them.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Show me where on Wikipedia it says the table width has to be 70% wide Collectonian. Why can't you answer my question?	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Why was this article marked for fixing? I was hoping that there would be some guidelines here on the talk page, for further research and edits. The article looks okay to a cursory reading by a non-Wiki reader.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Castro-lite WebLuis continues to revert to his watered-down, preferred image of Castro. He has not backed up his edits with any facts, only whined about ""personal attacks"" (some nonexistent) and empty statements. 04:56, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)"	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Antonov revert If you didn't like the red-link removals, why don't you just add them to the table I made? Also, you reverted the edit where I only added the logo of Antonov (it said so in the edit summary).	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Another crap article Parrots what promotion websites of capoeira schools say about myths of origin. And also that persecution thing. By the late 1800s, capoeira became a word for street brawling. Thus, authorities did not prohibit or sanction ""practice"" of capoeira. In banning capoeira they were banning outright street brawls! It's why Mestre Bimba presented his art as Luta Regional Baiana. No decent carioca would be eager to sympathise with capoeira and malandrismo. I could attempt to alter the article but it's become such a mess by now. "	1true	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
I never edited the content of your comments, please correct your false accusation.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
REDIRECT Talk:José Manuel Rojas	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
I agree that it shouldn't but clearly it does. The media make spouses household names. There's nothing we can do to stop that. But, as Jim rightly points out, Rein is more notable than some political spouses because of her prominence as a businesswoman and that potential conflict of interest (which she is trying to avoid). Nick	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" ""For Security Reasons"" edit war As I said in my edit summary, the term ""For Security Reasons"" is ambiguous and not properly established in the source. Further, it is unnecessary. You'd have to have a crystal ball to know why they did it and, as I said earlier, Janes is not perfect. The reason that all the other MG manufacturers alter their parts so they don't interchange is because the US BATFE makes them do it. Suddenly, Glock is different? Yeah, I guess that's just like Glock compensated pistols not acting like any other compensated pistol. I wonder if they actually shoot bullets? "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
This represents your immaturity and consistence at disruptive behaviour. — \| talk	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
\|- ! Macedonian ! Slavic ! Bulgarian (possibly)? ! Notes \|- \|1. Republic Of Macedonia \|\| \|\| \|\| \|\| Recognises the language as the as a dialect of the Macedonian language \|\| \|- \|2. \|\| Greece \|\| \|\| \|\|eg. Recognises speakers as slavophone greeks \|\| \|- \|3. \|\| \|\| \|\| Bulgaria \|\| Believes that Macedonian and Dopia/Slavic/Macedonian to both be part of the Bulgarian Diasystem \|\| \|- \|4. \|\| European Bureau for Lesser-Used Languages \|\| \|\| \|\| Recognised the Language as Macedonian in 2006 \|\| \|- \|5. Ethnologue \|\| \|\| \|\| \|\| The most comprehensive guide to the world's languages http://www.ethnologue.org/show_country.asp?name=GR \|\| \|- \|} there you go for more clarification. Altough we all know the stance of the various Governments does anyone have current sources for this. if so please add them. I hope that this table is clearer?? but their still needs to be more NGO's + Albania + EU? etc. please add constructive comments. ~~~~	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
If you feel that I am acting in manor inconsistent with my responsibilities you can post something at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. If you want to make changes to University of Wisconsin–Madison and you have reliable source references to support those changes then post the references with the changes. This Tutorial may help with references. If you have more questions just ask.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Part of editing for an encyclopedia is reducing extraordinary claims to ordinary fact I assume that this is meant in a derogatory fashion? 194.81.33.9	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
CfD nomination of Category:Wikipedia administrators I have nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. ☎	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false

Protecting 'Causes of the 1948 Palestinian exodus' Hi, Can you explain on its talk page why you protected this article? There is some edit warring going on, but not very heavy (for the standards of this article). Also I am a participant in a mediation case, but that concerns actually only the use of one source on this page, and is irrelevant to the present edit warring. Therefore I was wondering about your motivation. Regards,

0false

Hello, I check this personal page very often. Please leave messages here on on the discussion page. Tks. Marvio

0false

" My thanks to you for this. I note that I am being dressed down for everything from being nice to editors I like to work with, all the way to deleting messy posts from my own talk page. Well, a mess is a mess. Again, thanks Stephen. Please don't take that as gratuitous or ingratiating -).... imacowboy "

0false

I don't care what you say here. I don't believe one sentence anymore.

1true

0false

Anytime you want a nightcap, tell me.

0false

2010 Meet a Local - Vietnam TV Series, Factual / Documentary, 60mins 2010 Meet a Local - Spain TV Series, Factual / Documentary, 60mins 2009 Meet a Local - Tasmania TV Series, Factual / Documentary, 60mins 2009 Meet a Local - Ireland TV Series, Factual / Documentary, 60mins 2008 The Way - Camino de Santiago Feature, Factual / Documentary, 75mins 2008 African Stories Online, Factual / Documentary, 20mins, Overlander Multimedia for the ABC 2006 The Outback Boxing Troupe Online, Factual / Documentary, 30mins, Overlander Multimedia for the ABC, Australia, Production Company 2004 Returning Home - A Story of Ararat Online, Factual / Documentary, 20mins, Overlander Multimedia for the ABC 2001 Meet a Local - East Coast Australia TV Series, Factual / Documentary, 60mins 2001 Meet a Local - Outback Australia TV Series, Factual / Documentary, 60mins

0false

Globalization and 'Ivytrash' I am not Ivy anything. That was my home. I was born and raised 6 blocks from Harvard Square, and it was (once) the greatest place in this country. I am not interested in 'globalization'. I look at the square and see the smoking ruin of my home. When this happens to you, I hope globalization is comfort enough for you.

0false

He is, self-confessed , and approved by my observations (see, e.g., history of Soviet partisan). BTW, you're the first to object ).

0false

And btw, speaking of the Armenian genocide, if we are to follow wikipedia conventions of most common name (and I don't agree Assyrian is the most common name as we also have proven many times before) we should change the name of the current article Assyrian genocide to Seyfo.

0false

" To quote - If a Wikipedia article links to this page, it is because someone is concerned that the article contains inaccurate statement(s). Such statements are followed by the following warnings: ""(dubious - discuss)"". The accuracy of a statement may be a cause for concern if: * It contains unlikely information, without providing references. * It contains information which is particularly difficult to verify. Please DO NOT remove my dubious reference edits as that would be against the guidelines there, wouldn't it?"

0false

Belarus a developed country Hahaha, nothing more to say 82.209.225.33

0false

Censorship on Islamist Terrorism Try not being a censor monger. Properly cited information should not be deleted.

0false

If you would like to write an article of Bill's father, including his rise to CEO of Commonwealth Edison, feel free. This article is about Bill. We're not writing a chatty, book-lenth biography about him, but stating facts - same as other biographical articles in Wikipedia. The details of his father's career are irrelevant, although his (eventual) stature as CEO is not. This is yet another issue that has already been resolved.

0false

" Thanks! Really cool tool for purposes like what I have on my userpage. Best, Tally-ho! "

0false

It is funny because i would say exactly the same thing for you Astarti34 , the anonymous user with an ip from greece and the user WilliamThweatt . Accusing people , without a reason is not allowed in wikipedia . As per wikipedia rules you are free to ask for an investigation ! In fact i do kindly ask you to do so . If this vandalism persists i will seek an arbitration . I do kindly ask from any moderator , to see all the reverts , and i am confident that they will conclude that they have been mal intentioned , with a clear nationalistic agenda ... you all 3 guys have something in common , you are all greek * all 3 of you * ! ( )

0false

" =^_^= I just watched the entire series, and I agree, this entire article and several other in the suzumiya haruhi articles are all from a ""somebody who knows haruhi personally"" sort of view. So Im going to fix it. "

0false

" Agreed, will take a stab at it. It also needs major formatting cleanup and Wikifying, it sounds too much like a fan conversation - the references are all either YouTube links or ""personal communications"". I'm trying to at least pare down the ""BEST MUSICIAN EVER!"" statements, could use some help with the discography section too. "

0false

" Vandalism is for e.g. this type of edit, somebody said that The Stig was leaving so I reverted it, basically I reverted it because there was no source to suggest that he was leaving, so I do know what vandalism is I just want to carry on editing Wiki, I love this place it's amazing please don't ""make me leave"", now that I've explained myself please please unblock me ( Thanks —123 "

0false

" Baer didnt invent video games. This is jewish propaganda supported by a wiki troll named, ""Goldberg"" Go figure. Hey, ""goldberg"", try educating yourself. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EfBwz_SiK8s"

0false

I can tell you what the argument is about here newseventsguy. It's about YOUR retroactive reversion of a simple edit trying to include secondary independent verification of sedimentary nanodiamonds in Younger Dryas sediments by Bement and Madden et al., WITHOUT DISCUSSION a reference that I notice has NOT YET been included in the reference list still, after all this time. This is after you ADMIT that you are ignorant of the peer review literature and the controversy. Any attempt to do simple reference list edits on this page have been stomped by no less that five admittedly biased and ignorant editors. The honorable thing to do here would be to recuse yourself from editing the page, as I have. But I haven't seen that happening until now. Good luck with it, you've already made complete fools of yourselves.

1true

0false

HELLO HOW DO I GET SOMEBODY TO FIX SHIT AROUND HERE?

1true

0false

1true

0false

Dictionaries How dare you call my contribution spam!!! I am a Kurd and I made a lsit of kurdish dictionaries. you bloody turkish nationalist and atoricity commiting bone breaking Nazi. watch out folk this slimy Turk is trying to censor the internet this is not undemocratic Turkey here, no prison cells in wikipedia you stupid Turk! And you buggers want membership to the EEC

1true

0false

1true

0false

1true

" Apparently, other editors agree that the edits I made were justified. A group of meat-puppets working as a team to revert an article to their own POV is what has caused this block. At issue was the ""advert"" tag which is justified, was placed on the article by one editor, replaced by me, replaced again by another editor, and replaced again by me. Three editors, so far, have indicated the tag belongs there. I'm sure a forth editor is going to weigh in on this side too. The article is riddled with brochure language. Please note that I was removing brochure language right up to the lock-up of the article. There's still lots more in there that needs to come out before the advert tag should be removed. Additionally, I don't believe I broke the 3RR rule which requires a fourth reversion. "

0false

While I agree that Indus valley civilisation is the correct name for the civilisation, the passage quoted above is not neccecarily factual in terms of saying Second there is no proof at all that the mighty Sarasvati of the Rigveda was in fact this (now dry) river- the identification is itself open to doubt.. Apart from there being facts/proof to indicate that Saraswati did exist as this dry river ( including geological facts as to why it dried up) The evidence also points to the fact that it was NOT a tributary of the Indus, ( refuting point 3 of the passage quoted above ) and in fact drew the waters of the Sutlej and the Yamuna to be a river system of it's own. And though a large number of sites have been found along this river system, none of them are of the scale of Harrapa / Mohenjodaro, leaving the Indus Valley tag as the correct one. Saraswati did exist,today the timing is disputed and not the existence, Wheter it is vedic and indic vs Harrapan and non vedic is more disputed today than it's existence.

0false

" December 2015 (UTC) Thanks. I have started working on Pranagnihotra Upanishad but I am unable to get the full text from the Deussen's Sixty Upanishads (pages 646-648 do not appear in the book under Google url}. Can you suggest a url which gives the full text? In the meanwhile I have completed this short article Sharabha Upanishad which you may like to see and add/edit. Nvvchar. 01:52, 3"

0false

I insulted people on en.wiki with criteria to provoke my filter set. You are simply abusing the power people handed over.

0false

" Excellent! That would be great. The comments found at its peer review should also be very helpful, but I haven't had any time to actually act upon those suggestions. Cheers. —Hello! "

0false

How do you know he is dead. Its just his plane that crashed. Jeezz, quit busting his nuts, folks.

0false

1true

0false

" Afican Union site vandalism Dear BracketBot, I wrote this note to inform you that an editor is performing acts of vandalism in the website of the ""African Union"" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_Union. Please I would appreciate if you could tell me who I should report this action?, the Board Index name is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Knisfo "

0false

You are a know it all.....Jimbo! Why don't you get a life instead of sitting in front of your computer all day. The high priestess of knowledge, indeed!

1true

0false

" All of those statements need to be referenced. Leaving an article unreferenced in every section opens the door for original research and the introduction for factually inaccurate information. To point out one thing, I'll bring up Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012. First, it has a number of tags on it, the creation of articles that need to be tagged should be reason number 1 to remove the flag. Second, the only reference/link provided on the article is this one while the information is from various subpages of that. It appears that the entirety of the article is found at this deeper link. It's possible that some came from this as well, I can't tell. I'll also note that the style of the summary it was taken from was never meant to be encyclopedic, so the article is riddled with grammatical errors, mostly incomplete sentences. On creation, the opening read ""Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012 (H.R. 2055) is a bill passed to the 112th United States Congress"" I've never heard this usage (to rather than by) and assume it is incorrect, another editor changed it, the lead is also missing an important determiner. In any case, you can take a look at Vesey "

0false

Ok, I just ask. For your experience, what you think about the portal?

0false

Sitush, how can anyone assume good faith when you have been writing so much against Yadavs on that page.It is evident from the discussions, how conveniently you have been selecting sources for negatives and then conveniently rejecting the same sources for the positives. You are the only person spamming on that article and vandalizing it. Yes, I will contribute to other articles on Wiki too, but let me first correct things on Yadav as so much wrong has been going on there.You got Ikonoblast banned and now you have got me banned and you will get anyone banned you differs from your biased stand on Yadavs but I am not going to give up.I will follow all WP policies and will ensure that I get things corrected on Yadav and dont let your and fowlers personal views dominate that page.Peace !!

0false

", 30 December 2009 (UTC) Don't worry, I told you I had your back, and I'll continue to defend ya. ;) Yup, we got our proof of work. When I first saw it, I was like 'That's no reliable source', cause I remember you reverted that source one time. But, when I looked over the article and saw Ref. 63 I was like 'Oh shit', so I reverted it. I'm glad you went ""going back"". ;) I'm glad my ""two words"" have gone on to ""save"" me. Question: Would you like for me to expand leads on all SS members? (Hit 21:31"

0false

November 2014 (UTC) I agree with . Clearly Santilak is using up his usual bag of tricks. SantiLak, please discuss the article courteously and professionally. 2.177.207.221 08:38, 28

0false

" Ok, I like the pyx lax track very much indeed. If you could point me towards other greek trad music, that would be great, and greawt for me. Here are some Irish - , . Non visto ... Provvedi "

0false

where's with pitchforks already? 17:09, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

0false

Again reinstated sentence about 7 Nobels in the first paragraph, for the reason stated above. If others disagree that this is a defining characteristic of Bx Science that should be indicated right up front in the summary paragraphs, then can we discuss it here rather than playing edit games by removing text without either edit summaries or discussion on the talk page?

0false

I'm disappointed it wasn't a successful run, but it

0false

" Elvis... Crying in the Chapel Feudalist "

0false

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Fisting. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. tlka

0false

Elizabeth Hi lil romeo I am one of your biggest fans I really like you I always dream of you at night I would like you to come to Dallas Tx. to Ignacio Zaragoza and give a concert at this Elementary school I am in the 6th grade and I am 15 years old I want you to come and help me with my homework See you later I will write to you soon By

0false

Hi Fracophonie, Thanks for taking the time to write such a long message - I appreciate this. In terms of what I said about the age - I didn't mean to cause offense. I thought I read somewhere that you had to be over 18 to make these decisions but I think I was getting confused with the check user privileges. I have already read some of those policies but will read the rest later today. I am not a troll - I just need time to get used to all these acronyms, policies etc. From what started out with me writing an article about my favourite website has turned into a massive thing which was not what I was expecting. I really don't have any more time to argue and debate with the usrs since its clear they just want it deleted despite what I have said. For example one user just wrote there is another site called Amirite.net. This is Amirite.com!! This is precisely why I had to keep responding on the AFC delete page. In terms of the rest I agree to do them (of course I can only apologise once I am unblocked) - can you apologise for me? On a side note I am actually French and Jewish (shame about the gay part though:)

0false

Welcome! Hello, Soundchu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page and How to develop articles How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish) Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! WikHead

0false

I removed the content, after it was tagged as uncited by Mattisse. If every commonly known fact need a cite because some editor-en passent wants to nominate for FARC, then it appears we have a problem. I very much suspect Mattisse's motives here, but frankly, I am too tired of her to be bothered to explore them. Perhaps one of her probabtionary mentors, more interested in her than I, would care to deal with this.

0false

Is Jeff Garcia gay or not?

0false

That wouldn't be sufficient; you need explicit permission to use text copyrighted by someone else under a licence suitable for Wikipedia. Please read the guide to requesting and formalizing permission to use copyrighted works on Wikipedia. Note that, in addition to copyright requirements, the article must still comply with notability guidelines, advertising prohibition and avoid conflicts of interest. — (talk)

0false

The section is useful info and should stay - you are clearly wrong.

0false

Comment So now we are stuck with a week of 200+ broken links. Since you acknowledge that the move was a mistake and not uncontroversial, will you please revert it? If anyone wants to dispute that the opera is the primary topic, they can do so under a proper requested move discussion, as they should have done in the first place. If you are not willing or able to do this today, I'll ask a another administrator to do it.

0false

" It needs to be included, in the context of 1993 as well. I'll try and dig up some sources. User Talk Review me! "

0false

":::::::::: Tim, firstly I appreciate you taking the time to discuss this issue offline, and for your willingness to debate it at length here despite the majority view here being in your favour. Yes I certainly agree with your friend that it is very important to describe the jurisidictions that a firm is present in, there is clearly a massive diffence between, say having offices in the French or Japanese jurisdictions, or between the Chinese and U.S. jurisdictions, since the legal and regulatory systems are very different, as well as the commercial characteristics of the markets. Beyond that however it remains my firm view that there is a big difference between a law firm having an office in, say, Paris or Toulouse, even though they are both in the same jurisdiction. I appreciate that the situation in the U.S. is slightly more complex since you have both federal and state jurisdictions. Even within each state there will be big differences between the legal markets in different cities though. To give an example, the San Jose market will be not just a lot smaller overall than the Los Angeles market, but it will also have a quite different profile - on the whole a lot more specialist, niche and focused on high tech. To give another example, in the UK a law firm could never be regarded as being truly top tier if it didn't have an office in London, even if it had offices in every other big city. In fact all of the very top tier UK firms (DLA Piper is not yet regarded as one of them, despite its size) have just one UK office, in London, although they have other offices overseas. Saying that DLA has "" has 69 offices across the United States, Egypt, South Africa, Kenya, Thailand, China, ..."" would in my view still mean a loss of valuable information to the reader. We could fall back on using descriptions like ""in major financial centres"" or ""in major commercial centres"" or ""in a combination of major financial centres and major commercial centres"" but then we are introducing what is in my view an unnecesssary element of vagueness, imprecision and even original research. I do accept that DLA, with 69 offices, is right on the borderline of having too many offices to make it practical to list all of them in the article. However I do also feel that there is an important general point of principal that information about the office locations of a law firm is very valuable information to aid the reader of an article in understanding the subject of it, and should be included as much as possible. "

0false

No problem with that at all! If you don't think that there is a problem with someone siting that I have a mistress then it just proves my point as to how far this site is to being an actual encyclopedia. It's a forum, not an encyclopedia. Big difference. And that's not even what pisses me off the most about my page. Thank god I'm single with no chick bitching me out or that would be another attorney fee I'd be handing out to sue whoever owns this site. I'm done bitching about the mistress thing. My whole page has errors from the very first line down to the very last line, and that is no joke!! First line and the last line are wrong.

0false

Sprecher Brewery I took the tour this christmas when visiting my sister. We were charged an extra $1 for the glass. Their website may not be updated but that IS the current pricing.

0false

iPad talk page Why did you remove that IP's edit to the talk page? It wasn't spam...

0false

" Speedy deletion of Andrew takao A tag has been placed on Andrew takao requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. "

0false

" Image Image deletion warning Image:Metroid Prime Hunter title screen, top display.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion. 16:31, August 31, 2005 (UTC)"

0false

The real personal attacks are the repeated undoing of my edits by everyone else.

0false

" Nope, I didn't read the guide to appealing, didn't have time. The user in question IS engaged in harassment, I've been doing this long enough to know and I can prove it. He/she immediately placed a threatening notice of blocking me permanently on my user page, reverted the article while I was in the midst of editing it (my second pass, couldn't even preview changes), then changed his/her mind as to my real wiki-sin, since the onus for proving the Doris Day available as PD on archive.org was on him/her not me and the usual span for pre-Bern had expired long ago, ... decided my REAL sin was Original Research (oh noes), and continued to revert based on that. Does OR add clutter? Sure it can, but if the user in question was REALLY concerned about that, about the quality of the article and about extraneous details, WHY DIDN'T HE/SHE EVEN NOTICE two paragraphs already there, comprising about 1/3 of the entire article, dealt with Norman Schwarzkopf, an unrelated book and an unrelated ice cream store name? I'll tell you why: the user wasn't engaged in good-faith/goodwill editing and the normal back-and-forth that leads to better articles. He/she was involved in blocking input to the article. Why? Was it personal against me, or was it to preserve the existing content of the article, including the false claims and extraneous material not even concerned with ther subject at hand? I can only speculate, but I'd guess it's some sort of power trip and wiki-bullying. I don't really have time for this. I have made a fair number of very good edits over the years and have usually refrained from saying anything that isn't directly related to content and improving articles. I could pretend this user didn't do what he/she did, but I'm wasting my own time here and I don't really have a stake in any such pretense. I don't have any stake in improving this article either, no dog in the race, I just see how it can be improved and made more informative. As a long-term wikipedia user and editor, I don't see any problem in jumping in and fixing something. I almost expect some sort of pushback now, but not over completely minor edits which are very good and on-target in very minor stub-like articles. The problem isn't me here, it's that if people such as the user in question can get away with this sort of behavior, and they are getting away with it, wikipedia becomes a much poorer place, a playground filled with bullies rather than a library where we can all learn and share. Also, I don't recal ever having called him/her a bot, I think you put those words in my mouth, perhaps inadvertently. His/her behavior is malicious, but probably not malware, just the normal human collection of problems. I think this user should be warned against trying to be a gatekeeper, he/she isn't quite qualified for that at this point anyway, and it's having a very chilling effect across wikipedia. I won't egnage in a battle of the wikipedia rule acronyms, I will continue to write in English, and to read articles on wikipedia in English, and to think of ways to improve them in English. I am fully aware of how the terms ""vandlism"" are used and misused here, and most of the rest of the wikijargon. Nothing new under the sun here. If you read the edits I made carefully, and note the times of the reverts and the history of actions by that other user, you will see I'm not off the mark here at all. I know what's going on. I don't know why, but I don't have to, and I expect the motivations aren't interesting. Respond if you have anything to say. "

0false

the communist states == all three call themselves as the socialist states. communist is the word that westerner use. so should that name be changed? ==

0false

Boze Hadleigh, a journalist, interviewer and writer primarily of gossip about homosexuals of Hollywood.

0false

" ""IMDb content is user-submitted and often subject to incorrect speculation and rumor. The use of the IMDb on Wikipedia for referencing is considered unacceptable and strongly discouraged.""Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Resources ""...self-published media...are largely not acceptable. This includes any website whose content is largely user-generated, including the Internet Movie Database (IMDB)...""WP:USERG As I've said, this is a long-standing consensus. If you disagree, I encourage you to take it up at Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard. - "

0false

I'm new to this means of communicating ... and I am not sure that I expressing this in the right form. However, I am reviewing all of the recent (2000-2008) MA nominations (expected to go on the web in the next couple of months). In the process I have developed a database of corrected lat/long (decimal degrees), based on Google Earth and photos and assessors maps in the nomination files. I would like to share this, if there is a way of doing it. Alternatively, to find a way to EASILY check and correct existing coordinates on the Mass Wiki Lists. Would this be useful for anyone?

0false

Y2kgtp actually reverted the vandalism, I did not.

0false

Yes, I have read them both, and I will now ask you to provide back-up for your story. Not that it matters in the least, the one religion is as bad as the other. But you better have some proof for your claims. ChatNoir

0false

I think the error is that it is grams not kilograms. So 1.5 kg. I'm editing the article til we have a better result. If I'm wrong please change it back. 23:10, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)

0false

Vince - FYI 'Yellowfrogs' is (Longdendale) Councillor Sean Parker Perry, a frequent purveyor of 'Greenwash' and four square behind the destruction of Swallows Wood via his support for the bypass. He is vigourously re-editing the wikpedia pages on the Longdendale Bypass, his own and Roy Oldham's page in order to boost his fake 'green' credentials and obfuscate the neutrality of these articles. He gets nasty if he gets pissed off (threatens spurious legal action), but fortunately, he's legally illiterate, so don't be put off.

0false

Summary of situation User:ShimShem has taken a dislike to this article, and has tried numerous methods to either get it deleted or its name changed. 1) Completely invalid speedy deletion request 2) Invalid DRV request 3) Nominated for deletion via AfD, despite the fact that it had passed an AfD this year - in fact the AfD was withdrawn at 6-0 for Keep The current AFD here stands at 9-0 for Keep, but despite that, ShimShem has wikilawyered all the way through it - once it became clear that it was going to be kept, they decided a name change would be better... 4) Changed the name of the band in the article, and was told to take it to talk After a brief non-discussion on talk, moved the article anyway, and was reverted I was originally unsure of the motives of this editor - why they were completely desperate to delete or move this article - until I noted they were interested in Tamil subjects, one of which is M.I.A. (artist), and guessed that they believed that the two could be confused. Their subsequent creation of the article M I A as a redirect to M.I.A. (artist) proved this, as far as I am concerned. As to whether the band is actually called MIA or M.I.A., it differs. The band itself uses M.I.A. as the heading on their own website, but then uses a combination of both elsewhere. Since in the case of most sources, this is only likely to be laziness (much as R.E.M. are regularly referred to as REM), and since the article has existed here for a while, and that all the backlinks go to this version, and most of all because we shouldn't let disruptive users get their way, the article should stay here.

0false

" It is unnecessairy source, because it does not matter how many soldiers were killed. What matters is that the Safavids were deposed. Besides that, mentioning that information WITHOUT making any remarks about the brutality of the Afghan forces - for example the complete massacre of the Safavid family (including women and children), as well as the massacres on the civilian population in Isfahan, Bam, and villages of Khorasan - is considered POV. Besides that, you have not shown any sources for your claim that ""30000-100000 soldiers were killed"". And as for the edits: it does not matter what YOU believe, it only matters what the Wikipedia rules are. You posted a message without editting ANYTHING ... that's the same as abusing the article's history as a message-board. Use the REAL message-board instead. "

0false

Whoever wrote the Plot I feel terrible for whoever had to watch the movie in detail and then write the plot line. Who ever took their time to write the plot section must be traumatized for life. However, its missing the part where Milo's son is laying on his belly unconscious on a bed, Milo anally rapes him while several masked men watch. Also, there's some use of a knife/sword in this scene. This is truly one sick film. No, there is no artistic message. This film is basicly a middle finger by the sick-minded film makers. The cast must have been tricked into participating in this disgusting film. There's artistic gore such as the classic film Begotten and then there's this . . . Listen to me, DON'T WATCH THIS FILM NO MATTER HOW MUCH YOU ARE TEMPTED!

0false

" As he has asked admins not to comment, I will refrain from doing so. I did however remove a personal attack against him; if anyone wishes to discuss this action, please email me. &Windows; "

0false

" Can we compromise here? I don't think we have the budget for salmon, but (at least in the Netherlands) there is an ""in-between"" fish, more affordable, that in Dutch was called ""salmon trout."" So far, so good, S Marshall. Fortunately no one has yet discovered that you used to run drugs for a cartel or that you danced in a nightclub a la...Henry LaFarge, was it? in A Shot in the Dark? Ssshh, I'm not telling. Oh, I should ask you at your RfA about the proper use of citation templates. Later! "

0false

Sorry, I am not sure how to take care of him. He has quite the history, and actually has legal cases involving the Dayton Daily News. Wikipedia is at risk if he edits any of those pages or any affiliated company. The actual sockpuppet is 65.31.33.93, which is a puppet of hdayejr.

0false

We can agree to disagree on the relative merits of the fish and the character, but the red seabream is part of family Sparidae anyway. So that's usage outside North America right there.

0false

Large ships are typically launched into the water when the hulls are completed, but that doesn't mean all of the construction work is finished. Usually, there is still a significant amount of work to be done, including finishing the interior of the ship, building the superstructure, etc. Take a look at Image:SMS Seydliz under construction.jpg, for example; you can see the ship is already in the water, but a significant amount of work is being done to the superstructure. You can also read Ship naming and launching for more information about launching. Hope that helps.

0false

(...at which point I am predictably ignored and stonewalled, which seems to be the Wikipedia staff's official response to any direct questioning on the Justin Berry issue. One might think they've hired Scott McClellan to handle their PR. Clearly they are aware of the untenability of their position, and they're really hoping it will just go away. Sorry guys, it won't.)

0false

You need to prove notability using reliable sources. Just because it has some festivities (how large are they? who organized them?) in part of a country doesn't make it notable. Also, you need to change your username; this one will probably be blocked soon for violating the username policy (no names of web sites/businesses). (talk to me)

0false

4meter4's sigh and my concerns Only because Mr 4meter4 had reverted any of contributions of mine given to this article so far I did not have a single chance to develop it. His article called ¨falsetto¨ is not about falsetto. It may be about his arrogance, who knows. There are a huge contraries regarding only the definition of falsetto. There are many signs of entirely different falsetto compare those info which Mr 4meter4 such anxiously protects. In England, Italy or Spain 16th century were described entirely different types of falsettos. On the top of it, Mr 4meter4 perhaps never heard Pavarotti singing falsetto, or the falsetto of Ian Gillan. Singing of King Diamond is based on falsetto. What about Michael Kiske? Is it not falsetto? Mariah Carey or Whitney Houston do (did) not sing falsetto? Does any of these falsettos sound breathy? Not to me. Isn't out there published a note about those? Maybe only because 4meter4 does not look for it. Why? It would not fit to his article. He would have to admit that his ONLY source Vennard was probably having in the chair something else than falsetto or he was drunk. 4meter4 quickly opened two or three books and things he had swallowed the World. The whole physiology of his ¨only¨ falsetto is based on encyclopedia? Well, perhaps it is enough for Wikipedia or himself. But not for me. No. There is much more out there only regarding physiology. Much much more. And just because you allow idiots like 4meter4 to ¨develop¨ Wikipedia, the people, the readers of Wikipedia will read shit. Where are any proves of the research regarding female falsetto at 60ies, Mr Know Everything? Feel free to block me again. I have no desire to write here any more.

0false

You've also forgotten these Premier Leagues.... But still written in English.

0false

" Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! talk "

0false

What a motherfucking piece of crap those fuckheads for blocking us!

1true

0false

1true

0false

" 2010 (UTC) That's because when I made those tables, I classed everyone as ""independent"" unless I could confirm their party identification. According to this, the DLP intended to run in all 17 constituencies. According to this they had at least 5 candidates. I've only been able to identify two so far, so we do need to identify more. 03:19, 1 December"

0false

" Removed POV I removed undo criticism of Secretary Boutwell and POV. Wikipedia is not meant to bash persons reputations whether alive or dead. The following has been removed from the article. ""Boutwell did little to withdraw paper currency from circulation, shaping his financial policy to forestall either inflation or deflation. Intellectual critics saw in these actions a want of guiding principle and a lack of solid theoretical knowledge. ""He believed in knowledge just so far as it was convenient for him to justify his own theory that knowledge was a deception,"" Henry Adams wrote in a much-quoted analysis in 1870. ""He believed in common schools, and not in political science; in ledgers and cash-books, but not in Adam Smith or Mill; as one might believe in the multiplication-table, but not in Laplace or Newton. By a natural logic he made of his disbelief in the higher branches of political science a basis for his political practice, and thus grounding action on ignorance he carried out his principle to its remotest conclusions.""Henry Adams, ""The Session,"" North American Review, July, 1870, p. 36. But in a very corrupt time, it spoke well of Boutwell that nobody thought that he made money out of his Cabinet post, either for himself or his friends. Living within his salary, he lodged in a boarding-house throughout his tenure. His only pleasures lay in writing lectures and playing billiards or poker though never for money. Chicago Times, March 6, 1875. ""He is an inaccessible man, uninfluenced by fear, favor, affection or hope of reward, and does not burst out into brillian exhibitions of love or hatred,"" a New England politician wrote his brother. Henry F. French to Benjamin B. French, March 16, 1869, Benjamin B. French Papers, Library of Congress. ""Boutwell's financial policy was less dogmatic than pragmatic.""Liberal reformers had hoped that he would embrace civil service reform and rush the country towards the resumption of specie payments; but while Boutwell appointed subordinates on the basis of merit for the most part, , he did little to rein in the spoils system outside of Washington, remaining on friendly terms with the party bosses.''"" "

0false

You sir are an imbecile, and a pervert.

1true

0false

1true

0false

recaptcha 1 it isn't defamatory 2 it relates to a computer system not a living person ReCAPTCHA forces users to solve the Captcha to access whatever the service in question is. Forced labor is the definition slave labor, i am going to revert your reversion, please do not do it again or i will report you for vandalism also please don't send me threatening messages tia 94.168.204.89

0false

" Question on Possible Citation I'm sorry if I missed your question - I don't pay much attention to that page. In response to your question, let me start by repeating my boilerplate formulation: The job of Wikipedia editors is to verifiably summarize reliable sources using the neutral point of view. (I haven't yet worked in ""no original research"".) WP:NOR says that we mustn't integrate otherwise reliable information to arrive at novel conclusions. Comparing two lists and drawing conclusions from their differences and similarities is most likely original research. We can integrate information, so long as we don't arrive at new theories. Another principle to remember is that vagueness improves accuracy. The more precise we are the harder it is to be accurate. Getting down to details, the Predators and Editors website appears to be a reliable source so we can use it as a source. The Bauer site, even if somewhat unreliable, may be used in a limited fashion as a primary source about Bauer. I'm not familiar enough with this topic to make pronouncements on what would be correct. However I would say that your proposed text appears reasonable. The sources are sufficient, and no original conclusions are made. The website takedown issue is confusing to me, but you should be able to summarize what you find in reliable sources. Overall, my opinion is that the less we say about the subject the better. Attack articles are not encouraged. While we must show our subjects ""warts and all"" we shouldn't enlarge the warts, nor ignore their better features. Balance is a part of NPOV. - ""but you should be able to summarize what you find in reliable sources."" There no reliable sources only a he said she said blog flame war. It is alleged the website takdown was instigated by Bauer. It isn't clear if she did, and other factors between the forum and the IP are not known. It was the root cause of this article and all the players here were involved via these blogs. I don't see how that can be objective. Bauer I'm sorry I did not get back to you about the Usenet stuff et al., but I've been somewhat overloaded at work. Personally, I think the article is better now than when I first saw it, thanks to a lot of effort on the part of the primary editors of the article to bring the best sources and present them in a way that doesn't seem like a lynch mob. Y'all are doing a good job, and there should be enough editors on either side to ensure that something resembling nuetral gets posted . I'm glad to help and try and make the article neater, and I don't mean to sound brusque in the summary field, but there was a lot to cram in there. Thanks for the note, I appreciate it! I would say Karen saying I've called her names is an out and out fabrication. I've never done any such thing. ""or whether it's because he's been able to insult me and call me names on Wikipedia, repeatedly and without consequences"" I've accused her and Jule of carrying the water for TNH and Absolutewrite and they have. That isn't namecalling by a long stretch. I'm really weary of these attacks over this. This is mob rule. While avi seems genuine, she's hanging with a tough insulting tribe. The threats against me are real and escalating by the hour. Blaming me won't make my points any less valid. Nobody likes to be piled on by a crowd. It's the Internet equivalent of stoning. This is not a fabrication. I get awfully tired of being called a troll, or part of a mob or cult or ""group troll,"" or a ""self-interested partisan,"" or a ""blog comment commando,"" or other things I could point at if I wanted to depress myself. You also made a ""theoretical"" comment about me being ""nosy, fat and ugly."" Putting the word ""if"" in front of it doesn't make it any less of an insult. I've tried to be polite to you, and will continue to do so, but this is the response. And, please notice, like abi (Avi is Avraham the admin, abi the ML commenter who believes in kindness) I counseled against piling on. | Talk | contribs Those are not ad hominem names Karen. Yet you've linked to a thread where you and Teresa caled me a psycho. You should hear what she said in private when I asked NOT to be spoken of negatively in threads on Making Light. It's obvious you two are pro-TNH and absolutewrite. That's self-interest and backed up by the fact that you run to her for counseling. Well, avi can make her own decisons about it then can't sh

0false

Infobox hurricane season It's pretty much complete. I need to make some documentation, and possibly tweak things that may pop up. You might want to test it out, so if there are questions or suggestions, I can go ahead and address them.

0false

Show me where on Wikipedia it says the table width has to be 70% wide Collectonian. Why can't you answer my question?

0false

Why was this article marked for fixing? I was hoping that there would be some guidelines here on the talk page, for further research and edits. The article looks okay to a cursory reading by a non-Wiki reader.

0false

" Castro-lite WebLuis continues to revert to his watered-down, preferred image of Castro. He has not backed up his edits with any facts, only whined about ""personal attacks"" (some nonexistent) and empty statements. 04:56, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)"

0false

Antonov revert If you didn't like the red-link removals, why don't you just add them to the table I made? Also, you reverted the edit where I only added the logo of Antonov (it said so in the edit summary).

0false

" Another crap article Parrots what promotion websites of capoeira schools say about myths of origin. And also that persecution thing. By the late 1800s, capoeira became a word for street brawling. Thus, authorities did not prohibit or sanction ""practice"" of capoeira. In banning capoeira they were banning outright street brawls! It's why Mestre Bimba presented his art as Luta Regional Baiana. No decent carioca would be eager to sympathise with capoeira and malandrismo. I could attempt to alter the article but it's become such a mess by now. "

1true

0false

I never edited the content of your comments, please correct your false accusation.

0false

REDIRECT Talk:José Manuel Rojas

0false

I agree that it shouldn't but clearly it does. The media make spouses household names. There's nothing we can do to stop that. But, as Jim rightly points out, Rein is more notable than some political spouses because of her prominence as a businesswoman and that potential conflict of interest (which she is trying to avoid). Nick

0false

" ""For Security Reasons"" edit war As I said in my edit summary, the term ""For Security Reasons"" is ambiguous and not properly established in the source. Further, it is unnecessary. You'd have to have a crystal ball to know why they did it and, as I said earlier, Janes is not perfect. The reason that all the other MG manufacturers alter their parts so they don't interchange is because the US BATFE makes them do it. Suddenly, Glock is different? Yeah, I guess that's just like Glock compensated pistols not acting like any other compensated pistol. I wonder if they actually shoot bullets? "

0false

This represents your immaturity and consistence at disruptive behaviour. — | talk

0false

|- ! Macedonian ! Slavic ! Bulgarian (possibly)? ! Notes |- |1. Republic Of Macedonia || || || || Recognises the language as the as a dialect of the Macedonian language || |- |2. || Greece || || ||eg. Recognises speakers as slavophone greeks || |- |3. || || || Bulgaria || Believes that Macedonian and Dopia/Slavic/Macedonian to both be part of the Bulgarian Diasystem || |- |4. || European Bureau for Lesser-Used Languages || || || Recognised the Language as Macedonian in 2006 || |- |5. Ethnologue || || || || The most comprehensive guide to the world's languages http://www.ethnologue.org/show_country.asp?name=GR || |- |} there you go for more clarification. Altough we all know the stance of the various Governments does anyone have current sources for this. if so please add them. I hope that this table is clearer?? but their still needs to be more NGO's + Albania + EU? etc. please add constructive comments. ~~~~

0false

If you feel that I am acting in manor inconsistent with my responsibilities you can post something at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. If you want to make changes to University of Wisconsin–Madison and you have reliable source references to support those changes then post the references with the changes. This Tutorial may help with references. If you have more questions just ask.

0false

Part of editing for an encyclopedia is reducing extraordinary claims to ordinary fact I assume that this is meant in a derogatory fashion? 194.81.33.9

0false

CfD nomination of Category:Wikipedia administrators I have nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. ☎

0false