monology/jigsaw · Datasets at Hugging Face

comment_text stringlengths 6 5k	toxic class label 2 classes	severe_toxic class label 2 classes	obscene class label 2 classes	threat class label 2 classes	insult class label 2 classes	identity_hate class label 2 classes
" I did and have replied on your talk page. - ✰✰ echo "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Protect this Is this protected?	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Oh, I'm sure I could find a copy around somewhere... I just wanted to be able to link to it from the page.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
This article and List of supermarket chains in the United Kingdom both these articles serve the same purpose thus this one probably should be deleted and then the information transferred into the other article 212.140.128.36	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" {\| style=""background-color:#F5FFFA; padding:0;"" cellpadding=""0"" \|style=""border:1px solid #084080; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top; color:#000000;""\| Hello, ! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on , or place on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! {\| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#F5FFFA;"" \|style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""\| Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability \|class=""MainPageBG"" style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""\| {\| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""0"" cellspacing=""5"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA"" ! The community \|- \|style=""color:#000""\| Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threatsNE	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Since the same point has been made in the #Article Intro subsection on this page, I will make the change tomorrow, unless serious objections arise.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Well please be my guest and run a CU or whatever. I have no idea who that IP is but it looks totally different to mine (91.108... as per the huge rangeblock). That Andy Oakers chap merely found my page because he was stalking the guy who deleted an article of his, who just so happened to be deleting one of mine too. Also, what was wrong with the image I put on my user page? I am aware that it once appeared on Christopher Paul Neil because that stupid had inserted it there, but it's out of context on my userpage so not offensive right? (I only found the image because I was reading through the IP's edits. Like I say, I am nothing to do with either of these villains, so please feel free to run a CU so I can clear my name (why would I be advocating a ban of my own account anyway?!?)	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
October 2007 Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
HI Its a school - what do you expect?	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
, 26 June 2007 (UTC) The confusion was about the engine deal. - 14:10	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Um, the Georg Blume quote obviously implies that he was inquiring about the reason for the riots. James Miles was there to report on the riots, so he would ask questions pertaining to the riots. If they actually wanted to separate, I can tell you right now that, logically, they would've TOLD THEM they wanted to and would say something to the effect of ""FREE US, WE WANT TO SEPARATE"", but they did not. They just explained their issues, which were socioeconomic and ethnic issues. In addition, James Miles states: ""The rioting seemed primarily an eruption of ethnic hatred."",which I'm guessing he had to interview many rioters/residents to ask them about it. And rather, I don't think the Rodney King article is worded very well- it should be changed, but I'm guessing many people are already well-informed of the real reasons for those riots, unlike this riot where few seem to understand- including you! And, come on now, you're obviously just picking at straws to try to twist the article. All evidence so far points to the rioters looting and beating ethnic Han chinese out of hatred, not because they want to separate or they would've attacked much more government buildings rathern than focussing on the stores of more wealthy Chinese people. Right now, the article is pretty neutral as it already explains both sides and I hope people keep it this way.216.252.71.154 "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
I stop being a Jew and pay for decent Internet access via Google Fibre	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Emmanuel A. Asiegbu]] 22:41	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Sorry to eavesdrop, but are you sure third-party sites are reliable sources for WWE results? That notion sounds a bit absurd knowing that these third-parties get their information from a fourth-party, and they have no way to confirm what they're reporting to be true. I have read a lot of errors on some third-party results; they could be as minimal as mixing up the moves used in a match, but the reality is that mixing up at least something usually happens in all these results pages. How and why do you consider these to be reliable enough to reference our Wikipedia articles? '''''G (talk)''''' "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Vandalism Report Someone vandalized the political philosophy page. not sure how to change it back. thanks	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Dear Ronz, PSB the embedded links and the areas which I am trying to update: 1. The multi-stage fitness test, also known as the bleep test, beep test, pacer test, Leger-test or 20-m shuttle run test, is used by sports coaches and trainers to estimate an athlete's VO2 max (maximum oxygen uptake). The test is especially useful for players of sports like rugby, soccer, Australian rules football, hockey, netball, handball, tennis, squash and fitness testing at schools and colleges plus many other sports; employed by many international sporting teams as an accurate test of Cardiovascular fitness, one of the all-important ""Components of Fitness"". This test is also part of the FITNESSGRAM - Commercial Link, incorrect and unrelated to the Multi-stage Fitness Test physical fitness test to measure cardiorespiratory - Typo fitness. The test was created by Luc Leger, University of Montreal[1] published in 1983, ""A Maximal Multistage 20m Shuttle Run Test to predict VO2 Max"", and was re-published in the European Journal of Applied Physiology (vol 49 pp 1–12) in 1988 in its present form with 1 min stages under the name ""Multistage 20-m shuttle run test for aerobic fitness"".[2] Result equivalences between slightly modified versions are well explained by Tomkinson et al. in 2003.[3] The beep test world record is 19.2, held by Håkan Mild.[4][unreliable source?] - Embedded Commercial Link LAZYRUNNER added as Reference 2. The Multi-stage Fitness Test is know as both the beep test and bleep test, the broken links for the beep article are irrelevant to the content of the Multi-stage Fitness Test article as it discusses both. I look forward to hearing from you via PM. Kind regards, PFTests"	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
SarekOfVulcan RFA Thank you for !voting on my RfA. If you supported, I'll make sure your confidence is not misplaced; if you opposed, I'll take your criticism into account and try to adjust my behavior accordingly. See you around the wiki!	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
stupid head YOur dumb and you are stupid die die die go suck a butt	1true	0false	1true	1true	1true	0false
Perfect. Thanks talk contribs	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Okay, thanks for the explanation. Elsewhere I had the feeling to be mixed with this user (because we have similar letters in the name and I got messages about his contributions). So I just wanted to clarify that he is in all probability serious, but not necessarily familiar with the established contribution rules. SK	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Actually, ''everyone is going to survive. Even Ulrich, Odd (and Kiwi), and Natsumi. User:Angie Y.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
"Thank you for experimenting with the page Chili, New York on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. - (会話\|+\|投稿記録\|メール) "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Apologies. I've now undone my revision. I didn't research the reason for italicizing titles beforehand. Now I've found a mention of it on the talk page and have also noted the ""italics = No longer in development"" at the bottom of the template, I understand. Sorry again. I don't know why isn't working in your browser but as creative works, I was following the convention of italicizing the title. I'll check with WP:COMP but I note that, e.g. the Doom game titles are italicized. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
All: I've posted a request at Wikipedia:Requests for comment. — 13:38, May 8, 2005 (UTC)	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
If you had been watching the news you would have seen it.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Valued Picture nomination of File:Sammy woods.JPG Your Valued picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for valued picture status, File:Sammy woods.JPG, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
You mean, not remove a comment I made, but that was completely ignored by you? Isn't this addition of a comment altering your talk page. Besides, it is a page in wikipedia, which means the public can edit it.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Removed link to website This website http://www.pazsaz.com/kkat.html Krazy Kat Cartoons from the 1960s - A list of Krazy Kat cartoons in full-colors. Was listed and it's full of pop up windows and spammy links. It may be a good source but it'll open a lot of pop up windows before you get to it and that'll crash your computer. So I moved it to the reference page so if someone wants to see the list they can but be forwarned of the pop up ads 66.99.3.100 eric	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
This is a follow-up criticism of Gwen Gale's improper deletion of the Alex Jones criticism section. I have tried to have this discussed in a responsible way on her Talk page but she has outrageously deleted all the critiques I have posted there. In my view, Gwen Gale's actions and judgement are seriously called into question by her conduct apparent in this thread and subsequent attempts to discuss it. I will post the text of the complaint I made below. If you agree that she has acted improperly, please respond saying so. Two people of this opinion (one other) are required before a Request for Comment on her actions can be made. This is a complaint relating to the conduct of Administrator Gwen Gale with specific reference to her summary deletion of the section labelled “Criticism” in the Alex Jones Talk Show Host page on 15 March 2009. Her most substantive comments relating to the summary deletion were as follows “single source cited says it's not clear what even happened” I've removed it following WP:BLP and WP:WEIGHT, given the single cited source says it's not even clear what happened, it's nothing but a non-notable, second-hand anecdote about what may or may not have been a parking lot brawl. Gwen Gale (talk) The grounds (as you put it) are WP:BLP. Gwen Gale (talk) The complaint is based on five points 1/ Gwen Gale failed to follow proper policy with regard to deleting biographical material on living persons, viz. discussing it beforehand. The section had existed for some time, had been discussed and commented on extensively, and had been edited by several persons. As far as I am aware, Gwen Gale had no prior involvement in the page or the section concerned. Certainly, I had never seen her name in any of the page history. Unless it constituted a grave breach of some other policy, which not even Gwen Gale has claimed, any possible deletion should have been discussed beforehand and not executed summarily. To quote the BLP policy “Biographical material about a living individual that is not compliant with this policy should be improved and rectified; if this is not possible, then it should be removed.” No complaint about the nature of the material was made beforehand; no opportunity for improvement or rectification was offered. 2/ Having failed to discuss it properly beforehand, Gwen Gale also failed to discuss it properly afterwards. She made a few general remarks, using terms which, as will be discussed later, do not form part of any Wikipedia policy, viz. “single sourced, anecdotal”, and breezily referred those who wanted to discuss the matter with her to general Wikipedia policy documents, such as Biography of Living Persons or Verifiability. As will be shown in what follows the text did not violate either of these policy documents. Gwen Gale refused multiple specific requests to quote the exact passages of the Biography on Living Persons or Verifiability policies which she claimed had been violated. This refusal to properly discuss a summary deletion is against Wikipedia conduct guidelines and not acceptable behaviour in an Administator. 3/ Gwen Gale’s comments on the summary deletion reveal that she does not understand the core Wikipedia policy on reliable sources. 4/ Gwen Gale’s comments indicate that she does not understand the proper scope of Wikipedia’s policy on Verifiability. 5/ Gwen Gale’s comments reveal that she does not understand Wikipedia’s Biography on Living Persons policy. The only serious grounds on which deletion of the deleted text could be justified is Weight. This is not the ground on which Gwen Gale chose to defend it. She repeatedly cited BLP and V as the core defence of her actions, demonstrating that her judgement is massively flawed and that her administrative powers should be revoked. The core issue here is not the content. The core issue is Gwen Gale’s conduct and judgement. The Weight issue will, however, be discussed at the end. Gwen Gale’s Misunderstanding of the Wikipedia’s Guidelines on Reliable Sourcing It is clear that Gwen Gale does not understand Wikipedia’s policy on sourcing. In stating that the claims embodied in the deleted text were “anecdotal”, she is effectively second-guessing the judgement of the original reliable source, viz. The Austin Chronicle. She is implicitly expressing the view that the Austin Chronicle’s assembled journalists, editors, sub-editors and lawyers made an error in judgement in publishing the article in the first place. This is completely unacceptable and represents a FUNDAMENTAL ERROR IN JUDGEMENT. It is in no way appropriate for Wikipedia editors to make their own subjective judgements about the editorial standards of highly reputable and professional publications. It is the equivalent of an editor disputing a reference to a professional academic journal on	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
You seem to be confusing charge with conviction. Beingsshepherd	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Infobox The template must be changed to Template:Song infobox. talk • Ev	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Local Programming The WikiProject Television Stations states the following: ""A television station article should include: what kind of programming the station airs are there any original shows that the station shows?"" This means that the programming is appropriate content for this article and that it will remain on the page. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
I have nothing but contempt for such people, and I'm merely voicing that contempt. Stupid people who know nothing about anything should be shamed into silence. I don't know why you would try to shield mental deficients whose opinions are worthless from criticism and insults?	1true	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Golbez I was mearly creating an article on something that is really going-on. That is what this site claims to be about, isn't it? It is really just a liberal crusade though, so i suppose you are just defending one of the top contributers to liberalisms.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
If I do not see a post here to the contrary with 48 hours, I will carry out the proposed change. Stephen W. Houghton II, Eaglebrook ‘86 Avon Old Farms ‘89 96.26.177.229	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" There's a fansite that has scans of the article itself. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
"Hip-Hop Is NOT Dead But Ready To ""Get It""!!! (Calif) Hip-hop producer and west coast native E. Re-ill debuts his album “Get It”. “Get It” is the representation of E. Re-ill's mindset, ""I'm in a place in my life where I need to become who I am... I got to “Get It”!!! says E. Re-ill. “Get It” is an album that when focused on can bring out the drive in you to make your dreams real. Why you may ask? You need three things to achieve your goals Hope (expectations), Hustle (drive) and Hunger (appetite for success). These three mindsets are displayed in this album which accompanied by your dreams this will enable your inner being to ““Get It”!” E. Re-ill has been producing beats since the late 80's, influenced by Dr. Dre (and who isn't), Rick Rubin, performed with many stars, and has participated in great projects. A prior and classic venture was with the street-ball company Y.P.A. and the DVD titled ""The War"". E. Re-ills’ most rememberable time in making music is when N.W.A. was filming the classic controversial video ""Straight Outta Compton"" E. Re-ill's older brother caught the attention of Ice Cube and filmed Ice Cube telling E. Re-ill to keep up and he'll see him on top!!! That statement would drive E.Re-ill for many years. Hip-Hop has always been the “in touch with your inner voice” music and then we have always informed our community of how we see the actions displayed in front of us. Hip-Hop can be fun, dark, and everything in between. However, usually no matter the topic a hip-hop song it should captivate you!!! “Get It” is no exception to this, “Get It” displays emotional drive, creative sound packages, consistent vibe and sounds, and arguably some of the best lyrics delivered on hip-hop tracks in a long while. Songs like ""Dark People"" a description of pushing your self to great heights even when life shorts you of opportunities. ""I'm So Gangsta"" is a nice surprise!!! It is Fresh Caesar's look at the world biggest gangsta George Bush, and his fumbles with war and Katrina!!! Don't cheat yourself I'm so Gangsta is a necessary download!!! Oakland native and a brilliant lyricist Fresh Caesar (a.k.a. Omega) is currently working on his own album titled ""Jack London’s Square"". Fresh Caesar displays lyrical strengths of Nas and Jay-Z with a west coast flavor delivery. Fresh Caesar displays great lyrical ability and is definitely not your average rapper on the mic. Down South/Oakland rapper, Tom-E-Gunn has the sounds of Snoop Dogg's early gangsta swag with grit of the south. These songs are actually lost demos recently found. E. Re-ill felt compelled to use the demos for the world to hear due to their strong delivery of life experiences. E. Re-ill's “Get It” album is about all the aspirations that we desire in life money, success, respect, reflections of life, and excess of women and parties. This is the start of great things to come from this talented producer. iTunes search E.Re-ill (no spaces), Contact: myspace.com/ereill1 Also available on rhapsody, emusic, napster, Amazon..."	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
":Kitty - I will do that when I get a ""round tuit."" I also think a paragraph about Ohio's John Fowler is in order. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
You should seriosly look into reading and applying it yourself.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Yes, I saw dear old Slim Virgin on the war path again, must be tres difficult for her. Thanks.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Back in the day, I remember a certain user was trying to get the words ""official title"" into Ugetsu and Sansho the Bailiff on the basis of DVDs released by Eureka films. But definitely we should believe what the studio says, e.g. this, or this, holy macaroni batman look at that Japanese text: 商品名：御法度(DVD). "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Comments by Rp0211 – Hey, THR. I have read through this and agree with you. I must tell you, though, my reviews for editors have been to decrease the article backlog that the good article nominations page gets and were in good faith. I have reviewed mostly older nominations, but have also reviewed fairly new ones as well. However, I do believe that asking for help and having people ask me for help is doing nothing wrong and promotes Wikipedians to work together. (talk2me) "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
. But please (no matter what), be careful in your language. The policies are strict here. Make sure you know about WP:3RR also	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
hi who is this 65.7.162.38	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Ok, so we simply take away the info about 'one' railway and put it in a seperate section to indicate life before NXEA so as to ""declutter"" the article without having to make a new one? "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Tiger Sharks are damn weak! Great Whites are a whole lot better!	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
I'm not following you. Everyone knows the Wine and Algebra were founded in ancient Persia (Iran).	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
- Jim McG 1951. Feb. 7 2013. I have identified several phrases and sentences that may be either paraphrases or copies. One has already been edited out. I highlighted three others with bold and italics and have asked my coconspirators to fix the parts they created and to find others in need of repair. Also am looking at help pages for things like patrolling and categorization. Nevertheless, any specific help from patrollers or reviewers - which specific parts need to be fixed - I would appreciate.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Merge - Pseudoscience and references in GetBackers Comments It was proposed on 8 June 2006 to merge into this article Pseudoscience and references in GetBackers. Support Oppose	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Military of Albania Naclardo it is clear that you have no knowledge when it come to the military of Albania or Albania in general i see you have something against the Albanian people so you like to vandalize the articles, first you are using a old source which I disagree with but since you want to use it then you are going to quote it correctly your source says that Albania operates 375 tanks then that is what you will put not 79 as you states which is a made up figure by you that does not match your source non of your figures match their sources, also you are not allowed to move the disputed banner I have every right to put it there and you or no one is allowed to remove it until the depute is resolved, you’re a newbie so I can see you are not very familiar so here is something you can read to help you get familiarized with wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! No one seemed to have welcomed you. Only picking fights with you you are a newbie, hence be patient and don’t give up eventually you will learn everything you need to be a good editor	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Joseph Meyerhoff ‎ Hi, I reverted your edits to Joseph Meyerhoff, because you in fact created a new article after the current one. Could you, please, embed the information you have into the current article? Thanks.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" I believe that the Clean Air Act trial is deserving of a separate section, given the potential enormous exposure that BP has and the fact that this trial will be ongoing, generating headlines, through next year. Some editors have stated in edit summaries that this paragraph is ""soapboxing,"" but I don't think that it is. The trial, which has received extensive cover in the media, deals with issues for which BP has already pleaded guilty, and faces fine of up to $20 billion. The presence of other articles is immaterial. This is a very serious trial, and it behooves us to mention it to readers, and state what is at stake. Failure to do so would be a serious NPOV violation, as is the fact that the legal jeopardy that BP faces is not mentioned in the article thanks to the recent edits, an I have so tagged the article. On the figure, the BP Corporate editor monitoring the article on the talk page here has indicated that other sourcing states that the actual figure of BP's exposure from this trial is really $17 billion, not $ 20 billion. If that can be verified, the figure can be adjusted, but first we need to deal with whether we are going to deal with this in the article at all. Right now we are in the extraordinary position of an article on BP not stating that the U.S. Justice Department is seeking maximal penalties in the billions concerning an issue in which BP has already pleaded guilty to criminal charges. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Fun Beowulf is an exciting story to read and I really enjoyed it. JN	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Occupation for a short period of time is still occupation. It need not be permanent. Status of British forces in Germany changed over time but initially it was occupation forces, and this fact should be reflected by the suitable category. British military forces were stationed in Germany from 1945, while West Germany joined NATO only in 1955. This is whole lot of time. And British forces in British occupation zone were not within American, French or Soviet command structure, they only had liaison missions with allies. As you may notice, I'm not doing any reverts in Falklands war article, which is really somewhat controversial.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Alex Aydlett-Conquest, Lacey Boatright-Famine, Sean McWilliams-War, and Drew Aydlett-Death, are the horsemen of the apocalypse	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
i don't mind if you temporarily/indefinately remove the outpsyjah page as long as i can still access it. i understand that you require further source material to justify its existence. i only persevered so far with its inclusion as it is of importance to me, and in context, a notable feat musically, though i can see that under wikipedia's discretion it requires a more substantial list of references.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Talkback WrestleMania XXVIII The Undertaker 20–0 "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Nationalists I call them Serbo-nationalists because that is what they are: Tone, Dab, the lot of them. They are hardly Albanian nationalosts are they and they definately are not neutral. And if the arbitary comittee gets tought with me, let it get tough with them and their propaganda.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
April 2009 (UTC) But you seemed so definite when you proclaimed that no New Zealander would call Gloaming a NZ horse. Yet you did just that. Seems to me you are rather flexible in your viewpoints, and more than happy to change them should it suit you. There’s a word for that sort of thing, but I won’t use it as I’d very likely be blocked again. The rest of what you say is drivel, as is usual for you. Where was Sam Neil born? Where was Anna Paquin born? Where was Roger Donaldson born? Where was Bruno Lawrence born? Where was Keisha Castle Hughes born? 20:49, 27	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" I copy this from comfort women pages. It contains many references. Why Korean comfort women during Korean War and why Korean collaborators? Because it is true. It all happened and it was all discuss probably before you were born. So we look to the academics and newspapers for reference. From, The Construction of US Camptown Prostitution in South Korea: Transformation and Resistance by Lee, Na Young, 2006 'The term “comfort women” (wianbu) to refer to military prostitutes serving American soldiers signals the widespread acceptance of camptown prostitution as an inevitable means to entertain foreign soldiers. This term was commonly used in newspaper articles throughout the 1950s along with such phrases as “prostitutes catering to UN soldiers” and terms like yanggongju (Western princesses), or “UN madams” (woman getting a livelihood by serving UN soldiers).129 This usage continued during the 1960s and 1970s when camptown prostitution became more differentiated from non-U.S. military prostitution. The Korean government’s policy on prostitution reflected its public’s perspectives on prostitution, which was, in the decades after the war, regarded as a necessary means to feed Korea’s impoverished population.' The Chosun Ilbo or Daily News is major newspapers in South Korea 2,200,000 readers. Examples given are in Chosun Ilbo 23 August, 1960, it mentions, ""In Pup’yLng, some 150 'comfort women dealing with American troops'. Similar reports using the words ""comfort women"" are: KyLnghyang Ilbo, 11/25/1955; Chosun ilbo, 11/08/1957; Chosun ilbo, 8/23/1960; Chosun ilbo, 12/03/1963. A “Comfort Women’s demonstration” is also reported in 1966. In the mid- to late-1960s, there were numerous articles in Chosun ilbo reporting crimes committed against camptown prostitutes by American soldiers that continued to used the term 'comfort women'. Korea college girls recruited for the Nangnang Club were also viewed as ""yanggongju"" or comfort women (Seoul Sinmun 26 July, 1952; 10 October, 1953). Post-war military brothels were still known as comfort stations and the system based on the Japanese one. In 1958, the Chosun ilbo also accounts for the number of women involved as 300,000. The women who served “one American husband” were called “yangbuin” (Western madam) instead of the usual ""yanggalbo"" (western whore) who were generally treated by Korean society as “non-human beings”. Generally, the Yanggongju have been ignored in official Korean histories as a national shame until recent. Song-gun Chong in 1967 wrote, 3,000 so-called “comfort women” registered with the Health Section of the Military and the Military Police Corps of the U.S. Army (“Current Situations of Korean Prostitutes and Countermeasures.” Pophak-nonchong 8:65-87.) You can download the main reference at http://www.lib.umd.edu/drum/bitstream/1903/4162/1/umi-umd-3959.pdf References also arise in Yi, Imha. 2004a. The Korean War and Gende (Hankuk Chonjaengkwa Jaendo). Seoul: Sohaemunjip. Have you seen The Women Outside: Korean Women and the U.S. Military. Directors J.T. Takagi and Hye Jung Park. 1995. 60 minutes. VHS? Many of Korean women were also forced, tricked, financial compromised or even kidnapped into sexual slavery for American troops in South Korea. As example, the documentary features Yang Hyang Kim, who ""applied for a job in what she thought was a coffee house, only to be sold to a brothel outside Camp Stanley"". Same as Japanese Imperialists before them. They both documents how the Korean and American governments were involved, how Korean officials portrayed the women as “personal ambassadors” fulling their patriotic duty to nation by sexually servicing soldiers. The rape and murder of women by the pimps and the soldiers. It says. ""Drawing upon interviews and testimonies, emphasize that many of the women who ""serve"" the US military as so-called voluntary sex workers were in fact recruited in the same brutal ways as were their earlier counterparts in Japan's 'comfort system', that is, through coercion, trickery, and even force - because both Korean and American governmental interests have viewed men's access to female bodies for R & R as so crucial to military morale."" Priorend —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
By the way, please join my Royal Militia. details are on my userpage.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
You are wrong my friend. As anyone can see the first and the second as well as the third edit were not the same. I put new information, because you are the one who keeps deleting sourced parts. So I ask admin to block Osli, for nationalistic actions, removing international sources (ICTY judgement) in order to minimize genocide commited by Serbs in Srebrenica. Regards.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" My talk Happy Labor Day! Dear colleague, I just want to wish you a happy, hopefully, extended holiday weekend and nice end to summer! Your friend, My talk "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Curly Headed Doctor If it's legally legit, can you add the picture from here to Curly Headed Doctor. Thanks.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Agreed. And simply changing section headings does not go any way towards that. What is needed is to get rid of the current sections, having first distilled from them what the actual writers on terrorism actually say, and reassemble that into a world view.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Yes, his tragic flaw is wrath; the killing of his family is what led to his punishment of being assigned the 12 labors.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Vandalism on Atlantic Ocean Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism, which under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Well? What's wrong with you?119.92.93.84	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
The disambiguation page had two links, both of which linked to the same article. It therefore wasn't doing any disambiguating.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
User talk:58.164.218.163 - (Contributions)	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Apply fringe standards I believe the consensus is that Menzies theories qualify as WP:Fringe and should be treated as such. That means a) ""Claims must be based upon independent reliable sources"" and b) that an NPOV article will appear biased to those who support the theories and c) supporters are in violation of policy if they push for language that softens the required fringe treatment. lozzo "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Let me review the main article for BLP issues - 1 moment please. Chat "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
At the start of the academic year by India. It was founded in February 2013 by Ramesh.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Boy, this is classic: Definition: A scientist is someone who follows the scientific method. The scientific community is composed of all scientists. Claim: The evidence for HIV is so overwhelming, anyone who claims HIV does not cause AIDS must not be following the scientific method. Lemma: Therefore, someone who claims HIV does not cause AIDS is not a scientist. Theorem: Therefore, all members of the scientific community agree HIV causes AIDS. Corollary: Therefore, all ""debate"" over the HIV hypothesis occurs in ""non-scientific"" forums, ""outside the scientific community"". Brilliant reasoning there, MastCell and Nightscream. I wonder how people 20 years from now will read this without laughing their ass off. 69.45.178.143 ""Duesberg doesn't conduct research on HIV. He never has. Neither does Kary Mullis. Neither does the Perth Group."" ""Russian biologists don't conduct research on Michurinism. They never have."" ""Evolutionists don't conduct research on Intelligent Design. They never have."" ""Einstein doesn't conduct research on the photoelectric effect or Brownian motion. He never has."" 69.45.178.143 ""In 1948, genetics was officially declared 'a bourgeois pseudoscience'; all geneticists were fired from work (some were also arrested), and all genetic research was discontinued."" (from Wikipedia aritlce Lysenkoism). 69.45.178.143 '''''I THINK MAST CELL AND NIGHTSCREAM'S ""ARGUMENT"" OVER THE POV OR NON-POV NATURE OF THE WIKIPEDIA ARTICLE ""AIDS REAPPRAISAL"" IS INADEQUATE BECAUSE IT IS AS FOLLOWS (PLEASE NOTE: THIS IS CENTRAL TO THE POV-NON-POV DEBATE, NOT A DEBATE OF ""THE ISSUE"", MAST CELL): Definition: A scientist is someone who follows the scientific method. The scientific community is composed of all scientists. Claim: The evidence for HIV is so overwhelming, anyone who claims HIV does not cause AIDS must not be following the scientific method. Lemma: Therefore, someone who claims HIV does not cause AIDS is not a scientist. Theorem: Therefore, all members of the scientific community agree HIV causes AIDS. Corollary: Therefore, all ""debate"" over the HIV hypothesis occurs in ""non-scientific"" forums, ""outside the scientific community"". Mast Cell and Nightscream are using this pathetic ""argument"" as a justification for pushing their POV. So, yes, this comment IS very definitely in reference to ""improving the article"". THANK YOU. 69.45.178.143 "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Thank u Thank u Thank u your comment, and also ur home page is very nice "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" That's pretty cool. Thanks a bunch! [[WP:EA\|e]] (Talk)[[Special:Contributions/Tvaughn05\|(Contribs)]] "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
hi Hi. I found you in categories of users who can contribute in English and Portuguese. I myself am a native speaker of English, but I'm well on my way to learning Portuguese. Just check out my user page and talk page, and join in any of the discussions. To keep updated, you can even put a watch on my user page, which will automatically watch my talk page. -)	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Alf looks at Ozric, Ozric looks back, Alf shrugs. KOS where are you? melmac "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" This IP address has been blocked because it is believed to be an open proxy or zombie computer. To prevent abuse, editing from these proxies is currently prohibited. For more information about open proxies and what you can do, please see the WikiProject on open proxies. See also: [ block list] \| [ block log] \| [ related IP addresses]209.071.226.139 — user:catapult "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Vandalism? See if you can spot it: He is a pilot, a bigot, and an avid runner who has completed several marathons. He was a Christian missionary in Bolivia, rides motorcycles, and is a history enthusiast. 24.225.23.137	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" I didn't, I said that's the kind of things Islamists say. (Α⇔Ω ¦ ⇒✉) "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
[by user:Laomei, removed]	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Hello and thanks for the info, I just did the change of username.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Also, in the citation provided, those countries he mentioned as western were countries we already knew of. He didn't exclude Latin America and the West Indies (meaning we shouldn't either). Tom72.185.162.37	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Edited section entitled FATE and add a new section entitled FURTHER INFORMATION to specifically showcase images of the ship that can be viewed on the State Library of South Australia website. The location of the wreck is given as South Neptune Island based on the latitude & longitude advised in the Australian National Shipwreck Database - some other references state that the ship ran aground on North Neptune Island. cowdy001	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Strawberry Swing As an editor with a history of personal attacks and of creating attack pages, I disagree that it wasn't appropriate.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Thanks! for the . NawlinWiki (talk) My pleasure. I think I have to apologize for subjecting you to the diatribe it engendered but, as I think you might agree, it tends to prove the point in an ironic way. I just looked at your talk page and decided that the minor whining I* get from new page patrol is relatively polite compared to what you seem to have attracted hence the *. Accounting4Taste:talk NalinWiki, you deleted my article while I was still writing it on the basis that it contained ""no references whatsoever"" but allow your own article to stand even though it contains ""no references whatsoever"". Please, please explain how your point been proven in ""an ironic way"". Go ahead. Explain it. All I have seen so far from you is reckless deletion of other people`s work followed by pathetic back-slapping from like-minded wreckers. If you are going to have a dig at me, why not do it on my own talk page? You weren`t shy to destroy four hours of my work, so why be shy now? Kont Dracula (talk) I think you've confused the two of us; I must take credit for some statements that have apparently offended you, having signed them, so feel free to express yourself here about them. If you want the contents of an article that was deleted, in order to work on adding citations in a ""sandbox"" page, you can either ask me or another administrator for assistance. If you have any other questions about Wikipedia policies, I'll be happy to direct you to the relevant pages. And if you'd like to work on contributing to Wikipedia in a worthwhile way, in accordance with our policies, I think everyone here will try to assist you. Accounting4Taste:talk No, I haven`t confused anything. There is not very much to confuse between you two drones anyway. I see that you are not very good at answering specific questions about specific articles. Evidently, you feel much safer describing deleted articles that you have not even read as ""steaming crap"" than you are actually discussing the actual merits of said articles. A really positive, worthwhile contribution there. Is that the kind of ""contribution"" you want me to make? Hardly surprising that you prefer the classic politburo repsonse of ""directing me to the relevant"" regulations rather than discuss the merits of the case in question. Yet you have the arch hypocrisy to highlight the ""assume good faith"" legend on your page. Well I do have some questions about wikipedia policy, as you mention it: 1) Is it an acceptable practice for a wikipedia adminstrator to delete articles which are in the very process of being written without consultation or clarification on the basis that they do not contain references when the very same administrator has himself posted less relevant articles which do not contain references himself? 2) If the answer to the above is yes (and I have to conclude that it is, as that is precisely what has happened) would it be fair to conclude that wikipedia administrators feel themselves above and not subject to the same criteria for notability and verification as non-administrators? After all, my article contained no references and was deleted. NawlinWiki`s contained no references and was amended when I pointed it out. Please refer me to the relevant pages. Kont Dracula (talk) 1. Yes, to the first part of the question; administrators can delete articles without consultation or clarification. Articles that are being considered for deletion are assessed entirely on their own terms, and not with reference to any other article, so comparison of your article (which I have read) with any article created or edited by anyone else is not a relevant consideration. You can read the relevant policy at WP:WAX. Well I didn`t expect you to be so candid about it. So you believe that it is entirely acceptable for an administrator to completely ignore the very regulations that he is so dogmatically enforcing onto others. You still haven`t referred me to the ""relevant"" page on that one. But no, you have not ""read"" my article because it was in the very process of being written when it was deleted. I am sure that there was a great deal of improvement that it required. There were some slightly whimiscial and humourous details which were possibly not appropriate for a wikipedia entry. It wasn`t perfect. You see, that is why I was editing it and indeed still writing it. Of course, in reality we know that you have not actually expressed your own opinion. You were pretty forward with your opinion the other day though, weren`t you? You described other people`s articles as ""steaming shit"". Now though, you are not quite so forward with your opinion. Instead, you try to retreat behind ""guidelines"" ""r	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Issues This article has serious issues that need to be addressed.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
who the hell the lies about stuff that anyone can check my just looking at a different part of the same page the lie is written on?	1true	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
No. It's an image of Sellers in character, rather than of the man himself (and one of his lesser-known characters from his lesser known films too). It's down to a matter of opinion, but if you want the first image people see of Sellers to be something that looks like a pomaded pimp, then I'm not sure what image you have in your mind of him really! -	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Eblem ""* Decline reason: Let us know when you plan on acting your age. This one should last about 24 hours. Luna Santin (talk) "" You appear to have posted this in the wrong location. I did not request a block removal. In fact, I had requested my user page and talk page be removed. Because there was an IP block, my guess is that it snagged someone or someones else. In North America it is considered rude to suggest an action that you know someone cannot take. In this case, knowing that I was blocked, you knew that I could not ""let us know"" anything, whoever ""us"" is (is there someone in there with you?). Except insofar as you have office or authority in Wikipedia, no one cares about your personal assessments. In fulfilling your office or in exercising your authority, sharing your personal assessments is inappropriate. In the United States in particular derogatory references to age, national origin, race, and religion violate both Federal and various state laws, are subject to civil action, and in some cases criminal action, and were I you I whould refrain from making them. You do not know me, my age or sex, and gross impertinence suggesting that I act some age or other is unwarranted. It was, in fact, a personal attack: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:NPA If you wish to present as an impartial moderating influence in Wikipedia, leading by example in exercising office or authority, instead of presenting as an ill-bred boorish self-absorbed git, take these few observations in the spirit they were intended, control your editorializing, and familiarize yourself with internationally appropriate demeanor and etiquette. It will pay off in the long run, and I encourage to learn from this and change your ways. Bon appetit. Don't respond. Adieu. '"	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
You have already been given a good faith and solid opportunity to discuss this issue on the article's talk page, and you chose not to.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Hey FayssalFag, will you ever get a life offline and do something constructive with your life or are you adamant on perpetuating the idiotic sham of a reference that wikishitia is? What good has this pathetic OCD reference done but miseducate millions of monkeys? Have you consider moving to Cali? They've legalized same-sex marriage, filthy queer.	0false	0false	1true	0false	1true	0false
I have edited minor grammar errors so dont remove it. English is important	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
National Movie Awards U.K. Can we have National Movie Awards U.K. in the list? The awards will be presented for the first time in the UK. PS (AndhraNews.net)	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Pregnancy image duplicate Can you shut down this duplicate RFC that was opened immediately after an identical RFC was closed? Many editors feel this is not only out of process, but an actual abuse of process. Thanks! ☥ "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Since you yourself not going to make a separate discussion section in the RfC I'm going to make it myself. WP:RfC does not say anything about adding sections or morphing layout of someone's RfC so I believe there is no problem if I add a separate section.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
"::Small change? It's completely different. Sfacets "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Please don't spam Wikipedia. I've added you to my watch list and any further spamming will simply be reverted, equating to nothing more than a waste of your time and mine. Thank you. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false

" I did and have replied on your talk page. - ✰✰ echo "

0false

Protect this Is this protected?

0false

Oh, I'm sure I could find a copy around somewhere... I just wanted to be able to link to it from the page.

0false

This article and List of supermarket chains in the United Kingdom both these articles serve the same purpose thus this one probably should be deleted and then the information transferred into the other article 212.140.128.36

0false

" {| style=""background-color:#F5FFFA; padding:0;"" cellpadding=""0"" |style=""border:1px solid #084080; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top; color:#000000;""| Hello, ! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on , or place on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! {| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#F5FFFA;"" |style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""| Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability |class=""MainPageBG"" style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""| {| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""0"" cellspacing=""5"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA"" ! The community |- |style=""color:#000""| Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threatsNE

0false

Since the same point has been made in the #Article Intro subsection on this page, I will make the change tomorrow, unless serious objections arise.

0false

Well please be my guest and run a CU or whatever. I have no idea who that IP is but it looks totally different to mine (91.108... as per the huge rangeblock). That Andy Oakers chap merely found my page because he was stalking the guy who deleted an article of his, who just so happened to be deleting one of mine too. Also, what was wrong with the image I put on my user page? I am aware that it once appeared on Christopher Paul Neil because that stupid had inserted it there, but it's out of context on my userpage so not offensive right? (I only found the image because I was reading through the IP's edits. Like I say, I am nothing to do with either of these villains, so please feel free to run a CU so I can clear my name (why would I be advocating a ban of my own account anyway?!?)

0false

October 2007 Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

0false

HI Its a school - what do you expect?

0false

, 26 June 2007 (UTC) The confusion was about the engine deal. - 14:10

0false

" Um, the Georg Blume quote obviously implies that he was inquiring about the reason for the riots. James Miles was there to report on the riots, so he would ask questions pertaining to the riots. If they actually wanted to separate, I can tell you right now that, logically, they would've TOLD THEM they wanted to and would say something to the effect of ""FREE US, WE WANT TO SEPARATE"", but they did not. They just explained their issues, which were socioeconomic and ethnic issues. In addition, James Miles states: ""The rioting seemed primarily an eruption of ethnic hatred."",which I'm guessing he had to interview many rioters/residents to ask them about it. And rather, I don't think the Rodney King article is worded very well- it should be changed, but I'm guessing many people are already well-informed of the real reasons for those riots, unlike this riot where few seem to understand- including you! And, come on now, you're obviously just picking at straws to try to twist the article. All evidence so far points to the rioters looting and beating ethnic Han chinese out of hatred, not because they want to separate or they would've attacked much more government buildings rathern than focussing on the stores of more wealthy Chinese people. Right now, the article is pretty neutral as it already explains both sides and I hope people keep it this way.216.252.71.154 "

0false

I stop being a Jew and pay for decent Internet access via Google Fibre

0false

Emmanuel A. Asiegbu]] 22:41

0false

" Sorry to eavesdrop, but are you sure third-party sites are reliable sources for WWE results? That notion sounds a bit absurd knowing that these third-parties get their information from a fourth-party, and they have no way to confirm what they're reporting to be true. I have read a lot of errors on some third-party results; they could be as minimal as mixing up the moves used in a match, but the reality is that mixing up at least something usually happens in all these results pages. How and why do you consider these to be reliable enough to reference our Wikipedia articles? '''''G (talk)''''' "

0false

Vandalism Report Someone vandalized the political philosophy page. not sure how to change it back. thanks

0false

" Dear Ronz, PSB the embedded links and the areas which I am trying to update: 1. The multi-stage fitness test, also known as the bleep test, beep test, pacer test, Leger-test or 20-m shuttle run test, is used by sports coaches and trainers to estimate an athlete's VO2 max (maximum oxygen uptake). The test is especially useful for players of sports like rugby, soccer, Australian rules football, hockey, netball, handball, tennis, squash and fitness testing at schools and colleges plus many other sports; employed by many international sporting teams as an accurate test of Cardiovascular fitness, one of the all-important ""Components of Fitness"". This test is also part of the FITNESSGRAM - Commercial Link, incorrect and unrelated to the Multi-stage Fitness Test physical fitness test to measure cardiorespiratory - Typo fitness. The test was created by Luc Leger, University of Montreal[1] published in 1983, ""A Maximal Multistage 20m Shuttle Run Test to predict VO2 Max"", and was re-published in the European Journal of Applied Physiology (vol 49 pp 1–12) in 1988 in its present form with 1 min stages under the name ""Multistage 20-m shuttle run test for aerobic fitness"".[2] Result equivalences between slightly modified versions are well explained by Tomkinson et al. in 2003.[3] The beep test world record is 19.2, held by Håkan Mild.[4][unreliable source?] - Embedded Commercial Link LAZYRUNNER added as Reference 2. The Multi-stage Fitness Test is know as both the beep test and bleep test, the broken links for the beep article are irrelevant to the content of the Multi-stage Fitness Test article as it discusses both. I look forward to hearing from you via PM. Kind regards, PFTests"

0false

SarekOfVulcan RFA Thank you for !voting on my RfA. If you supported, I'll make sure your confidence is not misplaced; if you opposed, I'll take your criticism into account and try to adjust my behavior accordingly. See you around the wiki!

0false

stupid head YOur dumb and you are stupid die die die go suck a butt

1true

0false

1true

0false

Perfect. Thanks talk contribs

0false

Okay, thanks for the explanation. Elsewhere I had the feeling to be mixed with this user (because we have similar letters in the name and I got messages about his contributions). So I just wanted to clarify that he is in all probability serious, but not necessarily familiar with the established contribution rules. SK

0false

Actually, ''everyone is going to survive. Even Ulrich, Odd (and Kiwi), and Natsumi. User:Angie Y.

0false

"Thank you for experimenting with the page Chili, New York on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. - (会話|+|投稿記録|メール) "

0false

" Apologies. I've now undone my revision. I didn't research the reason for italicizing titles beforehand. Now I've found a mention of it on the talk page and have also noted the ""italics = No longer in development"" at the bottom of the template, I understand. Sorry again. I don't know why isn't working in your browser but as creative works, I was following the convention of italicizing the title. I'll check with WP:COMP but I note that, e.g. the Doom game titles are italicized. "

0false

All: I've posted a request at Wikipedia:Requests for comment. — 13:38, May 8, 2005 (UTC)

0false

If you had been watching the news you would have seen it.

0false

" Valued Picture nomination of File:Sammy woods.JPG Your Valued picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for valued picture status, File:Sammy woods.JPG, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates. "

0false

You mean, not remove a comment I made, but that was completely ignored by you? Isn't this addition of a comment altering your talk page. Besides, it is a page in wikipedia, which means the public can edit it.

0false

Removed link to website This website http://www.pazsaz.com/kkat.html Krazy Kat Cartoons from the 1960s - A list of Krazy Kat cartoons in full-colors. Was listed and it's full of pop up windows and spammy links. It may be a good source but it'll open a lot of pop up windows before you get to it and that'll crash your computer. So I moved it to the reference page so if someone wants to see the list they can but be forwarned of the pop up ads 66.99.3.100 eric

0false

This is a follow-up criticism of Gwen Gale's improper deletion of the Alex Jones criticism section. I have tried to have this discussed in a responsible way on her Talk page but she has outrageously deleted all the critiques I have posted there. In my view, Gwen Gale's actions and judgement are seriously called into question by her conduct apparent in this thread and subsequent attempts to discuss it. I will post the text of the complaint I made below. If you agree that she has acted improperly, please respond saying so. Two people of this opinion (one other) are required before a Request for Comment on her actions can be made. This is a complaint relating to the conduct of Administrator Gwen Gale with specific reference to her summary deletion of the section labelled “Criticism” in the Alex Jones Talk Show Host page on 15 March 2009. Her most substantive comments relating to the summary deletion were as follows “single source cited says it's not clear what even happened” I've removed it following WP:BLP and WP:WEIGHT, given the single cited source says it's not even clear what happened, it's nothing but a non-notable, second-hand anecdote about what may or may not have been a parking lot brawl. Gwen Gale (talk) The grounds (as you put it) are WP:BLP. Gwen Gale (talk) The complaint is based on five points 1/ Gwen Gale failed to follow proper policy with regard to deleting biographical material on living persons, viz. discussing it beforehand. The section had existed for some time, had been discussed and commented on extensively, and had been edited by several persons. As far as I am aware, Gwen Gale had no prior involvement in the page or the section concerned. Certainly, I had never seen her name in any of the page history. Unless it constituted a grave breach of some other policy, which not even Gwen Gale has claimed, any possible deletion should have been discussed beforehand and not executed summarily. To quote the BLP policy “Biographical material about a living individual that is not compliant with this policy should be improved and rectified; if this is not possible, then it should be removed.” No complaint about the nature of the material was made beforehand; no opportunity for improvement or rectification was offered. 2/ Having failed to discuss it properly beforehand, Gwen Gale also failed to discuss it properly afterwards. She made a few general remarks, using terms which, as will be discussed later, do not form part of any Wikipedia policy, viz. “single sourced, anecdotal”, and breezily referred those who wanted to discuss the matter with her to general Wikipedia policy documents, such as Biography of Living Persons or Verifiability. As will be shown in what follows the text did not violate either of these policy documents. Gwen Gale refused multiple specific requests to quote the exact passages of the Biography on Living Persons or Verifiability policies which she claimed had been violated. This refusal to properly discuss a summary deletion is against Wikipedia conduct guidelines and not acceptable behaviour in an Administator. 3/ Gwen Gale’s comments on the summary deletion reveal that she does not understand the core Wikipedia policy on reliable sources. 4/ Gwen Gale’s comments indicate that she does not understand the proper scope of Wikipedia’s policy on Verifiability. 5/ Gwen Gale’s comments reveal that she does not understand Wikipedia’s Biography on Living Persons policy. The only serious grounds on which deletion of the deleted text could be justified is Weight. This is not the ground on which Gwen Gale chose to defend it. She repeatedly cited BLP and V as the core defence of her actions, demonstrating that her judgement is massively flawed and that her administrative powers should be revoked. The core issue here is not the content. The core issue is Gwen Gale’s conduct and judgement. The Weight issue will, however, be discussed at the end. Gwen Gale’s Misunderstanding of the Wikipedia’s Guidelines on Reliable Sourcing It is clear that Gwen Gale does not understand Wikipedia’s policy on sourcing. In stating that the claims embodied in the deleted text were “anecdotal”, she is effectively second-guessing the judgement of the original reliable source, viz. The Austin Chronicle. She is implicitly expressing the view that the Austin Chronicle’s assembled journalists, editors, sub-editors and lawyers made an error in judgement in publishing the article in the first place. This is completely unacceptable and represents a FUNDAMENTAL ERROR IN JUDGEMENT. It is in no way appropriate for Wikipedia editors to make their own subjective judgements about the editorial standards of highly reputable and professional publications. It is the equivalent of an editor disputing a reference to a professional academic journal on

0false

You seem to be confusing *charge* with *conviction*. Beingsshepherd

0false

Infobox The template must be changed to Template:Song infobox. talk • Ev

0false

" If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ "

0false

" Local Programming The WikiProject Television Stations states the following: ""A television station article should include: what kind of programming the station airs are there any original shows that the station shows?"" This means that the programming is appropriate content for this article and that it will remain on the page. "

0false

I have nothing but contempt for such people, and I'm merely voicing that contempt. Stupid people who know nothing about anything should be shamed into silence. I don't know why you would try to shield mental deficients whose opinions are worthless from criticism and insults?

1true

0false

Golbez I was mearly creating an article on something that is really going-on. That is what this site claims to be about, isn't it? It is really just a liberal crusade though, so i suppose you are just defending one of the top contributers to liberalisms.

0false

If I do not see a post here to the contrary with 48 hours, I will carry out the proposed change. Stephen W. Houghton II, Eaglebrook ‘86 Avon Old Farms ‘89 96.26.177.229

0false

" There's a fansite that has scans of the article itself. "

0false

"Hip-Hop Is NOT Dead But Ready To ""Get It""!!! (Calif) Hip-hop producer and west coast native E. Re-ill debuts his album “Get It”. “Get It” is the representation of E. Re-ill's mindset, ""I'm in a place in my life where I need to become who I am... I got to “Get It”!!! says E. Re-ill. “Get It” is an album that when focused on can bring out the drive in you to make your dreams real. Why you may ask? You need three things to achieve your goals Hope (expectations), Hustle (drive) and Hunger (appetite for success). These three mindsets are displayed in this album which accompanied by your dreams this will enable your inner being to ““Get It”!” E. Re-ill has been producing beats since the late 80's, influenced by Dr. Dre (and who isn't), Rick Rubin, performed with many stars, and has participated in great projects. A prior and classic venture was with the street-ball company Y.P.A. and the DVD titled ""The War"". E. Re-ills’ most rememberable time in making music is when N.W.A. was filming the classic controversial video ""Straight Outta Compton"" E. Re-ill's older brother caught the attention of Ice Cube and filmed Ice Cube telling E. Re-ill to keep up and he'll see him on top!!! That statement would drive E.Re-ill for many years. Hip-Hop has always been the “in touch with your inner voice” music and then we have always informed our community of how we see the actions displayed in front of us. Hip-Hop can be fun, dark, and everything in between. However, usually no matter the topic a hip-hop song it should captivate you!!! “Get It” is no exception to this, “Get It” displays emotional drive, creative sound packages, consistent vibe and sounds, and arguably some of the best lyrics delivered on hip-hop tracks in a long while. Songs like ""Dark People"" a description of pushing your self to great heights even when life shorts you of opportunities. ""I'm So Gangsta"" is a nice surprise!!! It is Fresh Caesar's look at the world biggest gangsta George Bush, and his fumbles with war and Katrina!!! Don't cheat yourself I'm so Gangsta is a necessary download!!! Oakland native and a brilliant lyricist Fresh Caesar (a.k.a. Omega) is currently working on his own album titled ""Jack London’s Square"". Fresh Caesar displays lyrical strengths of Nas and Jay-Z with a west coast flavor delivery. Fresh Caesar displays great lyrical ability and is definitely not your average rapper on the mic. Down South/Oakland rapper, Tom-E-Gunn has the sounds of Snoop Dogg's early gangsta swag with grit of the south. These songs are actually lost demos recently found. E. Re-ill felt compelled to use the demos for the world to hear due to their strong delivery of life experiences. E. Re-ill's “Get It” album is about all the aspirations that we desire in life money, success, respect, reflections of life, and excess of women and parties. This is the start of great things to come from this talented producer. iTunes search E.Re-ill (no spaces), Contact: myspace.com/ereill1 Also available on rhapsody, emusic, napster, Amazon..."

0false

":Kitty - I will do that when I get a ""round tuit."" I also think a paragraph about Ohio's John Fowler is in order. "

0false

You should seriosly look into reading and applying it yourself.

0false

Yes, I saw dear old Slim Virgin on the war path again, must be tres difficult for her. Thanks.

0false

" Back in the day, I remember a certain user was trying to get the words ""official title"" into Ugetsu and Sansho the Bailiff on the basis of DVDs released by Eureka films. But definitely we should believe what the studio says, e.g. this, or this, holy macaroni batman look at that Japanese text: 商品名：御法度(DVD). "

0false

" Comments by Rp0211 – Hey, THR. I have read through this and agree with you. I must tell you, though, my reviews for editors have been to decrease the article backlog that the good article nominations page gets and were in good faith. I have reviewed mostly older nominations, but have also reviewed fairly new ones as well. However, I do believe that asking for help and having people ask me for help is doing nothing wrong and promotes Wikipedians to work together. (talk2me) "

0false

. But please (no matter what), be careful in your language. The policies are strict here. Make sure you know about WP:3RR also

0false

hi who is this 65.7.162.38

0false

" Ok, so we simply take away the info about 'one' railway and put it in a seperate section to indicate life before NXEA so as to ""declutter"" the article without having to make a new one? "

0false

Tiger Sharks are damn weak! Great Whites are a whole lot better!

0false

I'm not following you. Everyone knows the Wine and Algebra were founded in ancient Persia (Iran).

0false

- Jim McG 1951. Feb. 7 2013. I have identified several phrases and sentences that may be either paraphrases or copies. One has already been edited out. I highlighted three others with bold and italics and have asked my coconspirators to fix the parts they created and to find others in need of repair. Also am looking at help pages for things like patrolling and categorization. Nevertheless, any specific help from patrollers or reviewers - which specific parts need to be fixed - I would appreciate.

0false

Merge - Pseudoscience and references in GetBackers Comments It was proposed on 8 June 2006 to merge into this article Pseudoscience and references in GetBackers. Support Oppose

0false

Military of Albania Naclardo it is clear that you have no knowledge when it come to the military of Albania or Albania in general i see you have something against the Albanian people so you like to vandalize the articles, first you are using a old source which I disagree with but since you want to use it then you are going to quote it correctly your source says that Albania operates 375 tanks then that is what you will put not 79 as you states which is a made up figure by you that does not match your source non of your figures match their sources, also you are not allowed to move the disputed banner I have every right to put it there and you or no one is allowed to remove it until the depute is resolved, you’re a newbie so I can see you are not very familiar so here is something you can read to help you get familiarized with wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! No one seemed to have welcomed you. Only picking fights with you you are a newbie, hence be patient and don’t give up eventually you will learn everything you need to be a good editor

0false

Joseph Meyerhoff ‎ Hi, I reverted your edits to Joseph Meyerhoff, because you in fact created a new article after the current one. Could you, please, embed the information you have into the current article? Thanks.

0false

" I believe that the Clean Air Act trial is deserving of a separate section, given the potential enormous exposure that BP has and the fact that this trial will be ongoing, generating headlines, through next year. Some editors have stated in edit summaries that this paragraph is ""soapboxing,"" but I don't think that it is. The trial, which has received extensive cover in the media, deals with issues for which BP has already pleaded guilty, and faces fine of up to $20 billion. The presence of other articles is immaterial. This is a very serious trial, and it behooves us to mention it to readers, and state what is at stake. Failure to do so would be a serious NPOV violation, as is the fact that the legal jeopardy that BP faces is not mentioned in the article thanks to the recent edits, an I have so tagged the article. On the figure, the BP Corporate editor monitoring the article on the talk page here has indicated that other sourcing states that the actual figure of BP's exposure from this trial is really $17 billion, not $ 20 billion. If that can be verified, the figure can be adjusted, but first we need to deal with whether we are going to deal with this in the article at all. Right now we are in the extraordinary position of an article on BP not stating that the U.S. Justice Department is seeking maximal penalties in the billions concerning an issue in which BP has already pleaded guilty to criminal charges. "

0false

Fun Beowulf is an exciting story to read and I really enjoyed it. JN

0false

Occupation for a short period of time is still occupation. It need not be permanent. Status of British forces in Germany changed over time but initially it was occupation forces, and this fact should be reflected by the suitable category. British military forces were stationed in Germany from 1945, while West Germany joined NATO only in 1955. This is whole lot of time. And British forces in British occupation zone were not within American, French or Soviet command structure, they only had liaison missions with allies. As you may notice, I'm not doing any reverts in Falklands war article, which is really somewhat controversial.

0false

Alex Aydlett-Conquest, Lacey Boatright-Famine, Sean McWilliams-War, and Drew Aydlett-Death, are the horsemen of the apocalypse

0false

i don't mind if you temporarily/indefinately remove the outpsyjah page as long as i can still access it. i understand that you require further source material to justify its existence. i only persevered so far with its inclusion as it is of importance to me, and in context, a notable feat musically, though i can see that under wikipedia's discretion it requires a more substantial list of references.

0false

" Talkback WrestleMania XXVIII The Undertaker 20–0 "

0false

Nationalists I call them Serbo-nationalists because that is what they are: Tone, Dab, the lot of them. They are hardly Albanian nationalosts are they and they definately are not neutral. And if the arbitary comittee gets tought with me, let it get tough with them and their propaganda.

0false

April 2009 (UTC) But you seemed so definite when you proclaimed that no New Zealander would call Gloaming a NZ horse. Yet you did just that. Seems to me you are rather flexible in your viewpoints, and more than happy to change them should it suit you. There’s a word for that sort of thing, but I won’t use it as I’d very likely be blocked again. The rest of what you say is drivel, as is usual for you. Where was Sam Neil born? Where was Anna Paquin born? Where was Roger Donaldson born? Where was Bruno Lawrence born? Where was Keisha Castle Hughes born? 20:49, 27

0false

" I copy this from comfort women pages. It contains many references. Why Korean comfort women during Korean War and why Korean collaborators? Because it is true. It all happened and it was all discuss probably before you were born. So we look to the academics and newspapers for reference. From, The Construction of US Camptown Prostitution in South Korea: Transformation and Resistance by Lee, Na Young, 2006 'The term “comfort women” (wianbu) to refer to military prostitutes serving American soldiers signals the widespread acceptance of camptown prostitution as an inevitable means to entertain foreign soldiers. This term was commonly used in newspaper articles throughout the 1950s along with such phrases as “prostitutes catering to UN soldiers” and terms like yanggongju (Western princesses), or “UN madams” (woman getting a livelihood by serving UN soldiers).129 This usage continued during the 1960s and 1970s when camptown prostitution became more differentiated from non-U.S. military prostitution. The Korean government’s policy on prostitution reflected its public’s perspectives on prostitution, which was, in the decades after the war, regarded as a necessary means to feed Korea’s impoverished population.' The Chosun Ilbo or Daily News is major newspapers in South Korea 2,200,000 readers. Examples given are in Chosun Ilbo 23 August, 1960, it mentions, ""In Pup’yLng, some 150 'comfort women dealing with American troops'. Similar reports using the words ""comfort women"" are: KyLnghyang Ilbo, 11/25/1955; Chosun ilbo, 11/08/1957; Chosun ilbo, 8/23/1960; Chosun ilbo, 12/03/1963. A “Comfort Women’s demonstration” is also reported in 1966. In the mid- to late-1960s, there were numerous articles in Chosun ilbo reporting crimes committed against camptown prostitutes by American soldiers that continued to used the term 'comfort women'. Korea college girls recruited for the Nangnang Club were also viewed as ""yanggongju"" or comfort women (Seoul Sinmun 26 July, 1952; 10 October, 1953). Post-war military brothels were still known as comfort stations and the system based on the Japanese one. In 1958, the Chosun ilbo also accounts for the number of women involved as 300,000. The women who served “one American husband” were called “yangbuin” (Western madam) instead of the usual ""yanggalbo"" (western whore) who were generally treated by Korean society as “non-human beings”. Generally, the Yanggongju have been ignored in official Korean histories as a national shame until recent. Song-gun Chong in 1967 wrote, 3,000 so-called “comfort women” registered with the Health Section of the Military and the Military Police Corps of the U.S. Army (“Current Situations of Korean Prostitutes and Countermeasures.” Pophak-nonchong 8:65-87.) You can download the main reference at http://www.lib.umd.edu/drum/bitstream/1903/4162/1/umi-umd-3959.pdf References also arise in Yi, Imha. 2004a. The Korean War and Gende (Hankuk Chonjaengkwa Jaendo). Seoul: Sohaemunjip. Have you seen The Women Outside: Korean Women and the U.S. Military. Directors J.T. Takagi and Hye Jung Park. 1995. 60 minutes. VHS? Many of Korean women were also forced, tricked, financial compromised or even kidnapped into sexual slavery for American troops in South Korea. As example, the documentary features Yang Hyang Kim, who ""applied for a job in what she thought was a coffee house, only to be sold to a brothel outside Camp Stanley"". Same as Japanese Imperialists before them. They both documents how the Korean and American governments were involved, how Korean officials portrayed the women as “personal ambassadors” fulling their patriotic duty to nation by sexually servicing soldiers. The rape and murder of women by the pimps and the soldiers. It says. ""Drawing upon interviews and testimonies, emphasize that many of the women who ""serve"" the US military as so-called voluntary sex workers were in fact recruited in the same brutal ways as were their earlier counterparts in Japan's 'comfort system', that is, through coercion, trickery, and even force - because both Korean and American governmental interests have viewed men's access to female bodies for R & R as so crucial to military morale."" Priorend —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) "

0false

By the way, please join my Royal Militia. details are on my userpage.

0false

You are wrong my friend. As anyone can see the first and the second as well as the third edit were not the same. I put new information, because you are the one who keeps deleting sourced parts. So I ask admin to block Osli, for nationalistic actions, removing international sources (ICTY judgement) in order to minimize genocide commited by Serbs in Srebrenica. Regards.

0false

" My talk Happy Labor Day! Dear colleague, I just want to wish you a happy, hopefully, extended holiday weekend and nice end to summer! Your friend, My talk "

0false

Curly Headed Doctor If it's legally legit, can you add the picture from here to Curly Headed Doctor. Thanks.

0false

Agreed. And simply changing section headings does not go any way towards that. What is needed is to get rid of the current sections, having first distilled from them what the actual writers on terrorism actually say, and reassemble that into a world view.

0false

Yes, his tragic flaw is wrath; the killing of his family is what led to his punishment of being assigned the 12 labors.

0false

Vandalism on Atlantic Ocean Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism, which under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox.

0false

Well? What's wrong with you?119.92.93.84

0false

The disambiguation page had two links, both of which linked to the same article. It therefore wasn't doing any disambiguating.

0false

User talk:58.164.218.163 - (Contributions)

0false

" Apply fringe standards I believe the consensus is that Menzies theories qualify as WP:Fringe and should be treated as such. That means a) ""Claims must be based upon independent reliable sources"" and b) that an NPOV article will appear biased to those who support the theories and c) supporters are in violation of policy if they push for language that softens the required fringe treatment. lozzo "

0false

" Let me review the main article for BLP issues - 1 moment please. Chat "

0false

At the start of the academic year by India. It was founded in February 2013 by Ramesh.

0false

" Boy, this is classic: Definition: A scientist is someone who follows the scientific method. The scientific community is composed of all scientists. Claim: The evidence for HIV is so overwhelming, anyone who claims HIV does not cause AIDS must not be following the scientific method. Lemma: Therefore, someone who claims HIV does not cause AIDS is not a scientist. Theorem: Therefore, all members of the scientific community agree HIV causes AIDS. Corollary: Therefore, all ""debate"" over the HIV hypothesis occurs in ""non-scientific"" forums, ""outside the scientific community"". Brilliant reasoning there, MastCell and Nightscream. I wonder how people 20 years from now will read this without laughing their ass off. 69.45.178.143 ""Duesberg doesn't conduct research on HIV. He never has. Neither does Kary Mullis. Neither does the Perth Group."" ""Russian biologists don't conduct research on Michurinism. They never have."" ""Evolutionists don't conduct research on Intelligent Design. They never have."" ""Einstein doesn't conduct research on the photoelectric effect or Brownian motion. He never has."" 69.45.178.143 ""In 1948, genetics was officially declared 'a bourgeois pseudoscience'; all geneticists were fired from work (some were also arrested), and all genetic research was discontinued."" (from Wikipedia aritlce Lysenkoism). 69.45.178.143 '''''I THINK MAST CELL AND NIGHTSCREAM'S ""ARGUMENT"" OVER THE POV OR NON-POV NATURE OF THE WIKIPEDIA ARTICLE ""AIDS REAPPRAISAL"" IS INADEQUATE BECAUSE IT IS AS FOLLOWS (PLEASE NOTE: THIS IS CENTRAL TO THE POV-NON-POV DEBATE, NOT A DEBATE OF ""THE ISSUE"", MAST CELL): Definition: A scientist is someone who follows the scientific method. The scientific community is composed of all scientists. Claim: The evidence for HIV is so overwhelming, anyone who claims HIV does not cause AIDS must not be following the scientific method. Lemma: Therefore, someone who claims HIV does not cause AIDS is not a scientist. Theorem: Therefore, all members of the scientific community agree HIV causes AIDS. Corollary: Therefore, all ""debate"" over the HIV hypothesis occurs in ""non-scientific"" forums, ""outside the scientific community"". Mast Cell and Nightscream are using this pathetic ""argument"" as a justification for pushing their POV. So, yes, this comment IS very definitely in reference to ""improving the article"". THANK YOU. 69.45.178.143 "

0false

" Thank u Thank u Thank u your comment, and also ur home page is very nice "

0false

" That's pretty cool. Thanks a bunch! [[WP:EA|e]] (Talk)[[Special:Contributions/Tvaughn05|(Contribs)]] "

0false

hi Hi. I found you in categories of users who can contribute in English and Portuguese. I myself am a native speaker of English, but I'm well on my way to learning Portuguese. Just check out my user page and talk page, and join in any of the discussions. To keep updated, you can even put a watch on my user page, which will automatically watch my talk page. -)

0false

" Alf looks at Ozric, Ozric looks back, Alf shrugs. KOS where are you? melmac "

0false

" This IP address has been blocked because it is believed to be an open proxy or zombie computer. To prevent abuse, editing from these proxies is currently prohibited. For more information about open proxies and what you can do, please see the WikiProject on open proxies. See also: [ block list] | [ block log] | [ related IP addresses]209.071.226.139 — user:catapult "

0false

Vandalism? See if you can spot it: He is a pilot, a bigot, and an avid runner who has completed several marathons. He was a Christian missionary in Bolivia, rides motorcycles, and is a history enthusiast. 24.225.23.137

0false

" I didn't, I said that's the kind of things Islamists say. (Α⇔Ω ¦ ⇒✉) "

0false

[by user:Laomei, removed]

0false

Hello and thanks for the info, I just did the change of username.

0false

Also, in the citation provided, those countries he mentioned as western were countries we already knew of. He didn't exclude Latin America and the West Indies (meaning we shouldn't either). Tom72.185.162.37

0false

Edited section entitled FATE and add a new section entitled FURTHER INFORMATION to specifically showcase images of the ship that can be viewed on the State Library of South Australia website. The location of the wreck is given as South Neptune Island based on the latitude & longitude advised in the Australian National Shipwreck Database - some other references state that the ship ran aground on North Neptune Island. cowdy001

0false

Strawberry Swing As an editor with a history of personal attacks and of creating attack pages, I disagree that it wasn't appropriate.

0false

" Thanks! for the *. NawlinWiki (talk) My pleasure. I think I have to apologize for subjecting you to the diatribe it engendered but, as I think you might agree, it tends to prove the point in an ironic way. I just looked at your talk page and decided that the minor whining *I* get from new page patrol is relatively polite compared to what you seem to have attracted hence the *. Accounting4Taste:talk NalinWiki, you deleted my article while I was still writing it on the basis that it contained ""no references whatsoever"" but allow your own article to stand even though it contains ""no references whatsoever"". Please, please explain how your point been proven in ""an ironic way"". Go ahead. Explain it. All I have seen so far from you is reckless deletion of other people`s work followed by pathetic back-slapping from like-minded wreckers. If you are going to have a dig at me, why not do it on my own talk page? You weren`t shy to destroy four hours of my work, so why be shy now? Kont Dracula (talk) I think you've confused the two of us; I must take credit for some statements that have apparently offended you, having signed them, so feel free to express yourself here about them. If you want the contents of an article that was deleted, in order to work on adding citations in a ""sandbox"" page, you can either ask me or another administrator for assistance. If you have any other questions about Wikipedia policies, I'll be happy to direct you to the relevant pages. And if you'd like to work on contributing to Wikipedia in a worthwhile way, in accordance with our policies, I think everyone here will try to assist you. Accounting4Taste:talk No, I haven`t confused anything. There is not very much to confuse between you two drones anyway. I see that you are not very good at answering specific questions about specific articles. Evidently, you feel much safer describing deleted articles that you have not even read as ""steaming crap"" than you are actually discussing the actual merits of said articles. A really positive, worthwhile contribution there. Is that the kind of ""contribution"" you want me to make? Hardly surprising that you prefer the classic politburo repsonse of ""directing me to the relevant"" regulations rather than discuss the merits of the case in question. Yet you have the arch hypocrisy to highlight the ""assume good faith"" legend on your page. Well I do have some questions about wikipedia policy, as you mention it: 1) Is it an acceptable practice for a wikipedia adminstrator to delete articles which are in the very process of being written without consultation or clarification on the basis that they do not contain references when the very same administrator has himself posted less relevant articles which do not contain references himself? 2) If the answer to the above is yes (and I have to conclude that it is, as that is precisely what has happened) would it be fair to conclude that wikipedia administrators feel themselves above and not subject to the same criteria for notability and verification as non-administrators? After all, my article contained no references and was deleted. NawlinWiki`s contained no references and was amended when I pointed it out. Please refer me to the relevant pages. Kont Dracula (talk) 1. Yes, to the first part of the question; administrators can delete articles without consultation or clarification. Articles that are being considered for deletion are assessed entirely on their own terms, and not with reference to any other article, so comparison of your article (which I have read) with any article created or edited by anyone else is not a relevant consideration. You can read the relevant policy at WP:WAX. Well I didn`t expect you to be so candid about it. So you believe that it is entirely acceptable for an administrator to completely ignore the very regulations that he is so dogmatically enforcing onto others. You still haven`t referred me to the ""relevant"" page on that one. But no, you have not ""read"" my article because it was in the very process of being written when it was deleted. I am sure that there was a great deal of improvement that it required. There were some slightly whimiscial and humourous details which were possibly not appropriate for a wikipedia entry. It wasn`t perfect. You see, that is why I was editing it and indeed still writing it. Of course, in reality we know that you have not actually expressed your own opinion. You were pretty forward with your opinion the other day though, weren`t you? You described other people`s articles as ""steaming shit"". Now though, you are not quite so forward with your opinion. Instead, you try to retreat behind ""guidelines"" ""r

0false

Issues This article has serious issues that need to be addressed.

0false

who the hell the lies about stuff that anyone can check my just looking at a different part of the same page the lie is written on?

1true

0false

No. It's an image of Sellers in character, rather than of the man himself (and one of his lesser-known characters from his lesser known films too). It's down to a matter of opinion, but if you want the first image people see of Sellers to be something that looks like a pomaded pimp, then I'm not sure what image you have in your mind of him really! -

0false

" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Eblem ""* Decline reason: Let us know when you plan on acting your age. This one should last about 24 hours. Luna Santin (talk) "" You appear to have posted this in the wrong location. I did not request a block removal. In fact, I had requested my user page and talk page be *removed*. Because there was an IP block, my guess is that it snagged someone or someones else. In North America it is considered rude to suggest an action that you know someone cannot take. In this case, knowing that I was blocked, you knew that I could not ""let us know"" anything, whoever ""us"" is (is there someone in there with you?). Except insofar as you have office or authority in Wikipedia, no one cares about your personal assessments. In fulfilling your office or in exercising your authority, sharing your personal assessments is inappropriate. In the United States in particular derogatory references to age, national origin, race, and religion violate both Federal and various state laws, are subject to civil action, and in some cases criminal action, and were I you I whould refrain from making them. You do not know me, my age or sex, and gross impertinence suggesting that I act some age or other is unwarranted. It was, in fact, a personal attack: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:NPA If you wish to present as an impartial moderating influence in Wikipedia, leading by example in exercising office or authority, instead of presenting as an ill-bred boorish self-absorbed git, take these few observations in the spirit they were intended, control your editorializing, and familiarize yourself with internationally appropriate demeanor and etiquette. It will pay off in the long run, and I encourage to learn from this and change your ways. Bon appetit. Don't respond. Adieu. '"

0false

You have already been given a good faith and solid opportunity to discuss this issue on the article's talk page, and you chose not to.

0false

Hey FayssalFag, will you ever get a life offline and do something constructive with your life or are you adamant on perpetuating the idiotic sham of a reference that wikishitia is? What good has this pathetic OCD reference done but miseducate millions of monkeys? Have you consider moving to Cali? They've legalized same-sex marriage, filthy queer.

0false

1true

0false

1true

0false

I have edited minor grammar errors so dont remove it. English is important

0false

National Movie Awards U.K. Can we have National Movie Awards U.K. in the list? The awards will be presented for the first time in the UK. PS (AndhraNews.net)

0false

" Pregnancy image duplicate Can you shut down this duplicate RFC that was opened immediately after an identical RFC was closed? Many editors feel this is not only out of process, but an actual abuse of process. Thanks! ☥ "

0false

Since you yourself not going to make a separate discussion section in the RfC I'm going to make it myself. WP:RfC does not say anything about adding sections or morphing layout of someone's RfC so I believe there is no problem if I add a separate section.

0false

"::Small change? It's completely different. Sfacets "

0false

" Please don't spam Wikipedia. I've added you to my watch list and any further spamming will simply be reverted, equating to nothing more than a waste of your time and mine. Thank you. "

0false