Datasets:

lituus

/

Intellinoun_NounsDAOSentiment

like 0

I love collectibles, pls make duck

Neutral

Positive

Council wants to support this Prop because Leo is a great contributor to the DAO, Dean is an excellent artist, and we like the fact that all raw footage will be returned to the DAO to be used in marketing. A few Council members did vote against or abstained with the feedback that perhaps the scope of the documentary could have been more broadly about Nouns, or about a more varied selection of extension projects / artists rather than just one. Good luck to Leo and team!

Positive

Positive

Documentary content about artists inspired by nouns is important to collect in these early days.

Neutral

Positive

Going yes for the "Stage 1" portion of this. Slim has been a valued community member and I would rather err on the side of seeing how this can develop rather than cut if off here. However, proactively sharing that I'll likely vote against for "Stage 2" if the designs remain roughly as is. I'm not an expert (and of course this is subjective) but personally it's not an aesthetic that I feel compelled by.

Neutral

Positive

Choice as bro

Neutral

Neutral

We like the toys. !fun for all ages.

Positive

Positive

Nouns are intentionally lo-fi, so artists can more easily riff on them, this proposal speaks to that and i'd like to see more renIitions that stray from the original pixels

Neutral

Positive

Bro, stuff like this was a thing 25 years ago, you have to wait another 15 years before they become a thing again.

Neutral

Positive

Slim is a valued enthusiastic member of the Nouns community (and Council!) with lots of great ideas, and he is devoting a great deal of energy and resources to Nounish initiatives like this one. The DAO needs creatives liNourishto stick around and BUIDL, and we think he should be given the opportunity here to have his team focus on this project, consulting and iterating until a consensus can be reached on final aesthetic for the toys before production. KBU IDLls include Nouncil toga as one of the bodies and also Joel head thank you. Sincerely, NouncilSlimCouncil, thankCouncil

Positive

Positive

This is legit!

Positive

Neutral

We thought this Proposal was far from stupid, buddy. The team is a veritable League of Legends, and we are looking forward to dancing with you all at the Rose Parade to celebrate (suggested dances to learn in preparation: The Robot, The Chicken Dance.) In all seriousness, this is a great opportunity for the proliferation of Nouns, and we appreciated how detailed and structured the Proposal was, with Phases that are tied to percentages of the ask. Would recommend future proposers structure similarly, for bigger asks especially, to help voters better understand the process and breakdown of costs.

Positive

Positive

Really disappointed in you, ape noun

Negative

Negative

I think the rally car sponsorship is really awesome ideally, but the bang for the buck seems really low :(

Neutral

Negative

This is going to be Stooped Fun! 🌹

Positive

Positive

Wen merch ;)

Positive

Positive

This was probably our most contentious YES vote to date (final tally was 20 votes for, 10 against, 6 abstentions.) Overall, I think the common theme from our discussions on Council call this week was that MadHappy is a great brand, and this potentially represents a great opportunity for Nouns to get positive exposure in the streetwear community. Also, we overall acknowledge tHappyblished artists and brands can be afforded a certain baseline of trust to execute on ideas. However, having said that, many Nouncillors expressed concern at the fact that the Proposal included no mockups or design plans, and no Development Phases tied to Milestones. We would like to see, even from established brands, at least some basic mockups to determine whether the designs will be desirable, and/or Nounish. And some Phase Breakdowns, maybe with a design consultation Phase to start, woulCouncillors this Proposal more amenable to more Nouncillors (we think.) We're voting FOR, and excited to see the result, but hopefully this feedback is taken to heart by future proposers so that good ideas don't lose votes due to a lack of detail in their on-chain Proposal. NourishCouncillors

Neutral

Positive

Appreciate the Mad happy team for iterating on this proposal over the weeks. Excited for this collababout

Positive

Positive

On Council call, we had a fruitful discussion about this proposal and overall some NouCouncillorsmiliar with the sport indicated that it felt like a big investment to make in the sport when perhaps more exposure could be gotten, even within this sport, by sponsoring events etc, rather than an entire team/season. The concern was also voiced that the DAetc.wning the cars could be a cost/liability after the season (storage, etc.) Overall, we like the energy and the proposal was well written, but the majority voted No this time. We really like Don and his energy and hope he will stick around and build more within Nouns. Kudos to him for seeking lots of discussion on Discourse and holding open calls in the discord to take feedback. We should encourage this kind of builder to stick around. Dom, please build something Nounish, even if it's small, so that we can invite you to join Nouncil!DOMNourishCouncil

Neutral

Positive

Mad happy for this collab (✿´‿`)

Positive

Positive

Shared is in! 🦈

Neutral

Neutral

Makes me mad happy

Positive

Neutral

Nouns from space, a space to play, that's a yes from me. O-H-I-O

Positive

Positive

I wish I was a German bot I wish I was little bit talllittleI was a baller I wish I had a girl who looked good I would call her I wish I had a rabbit in a hat with a bat And a six four Impala

Neutral

Positive

Have you ever had a dream that you um you had you'd you would you could you'd, do you wi you wants you you could do so you you'dwould,ou could you you want you want him to do you so much yocould,ld do anything?WIyouyouyou want

Neutral

Positive

Even if we had never heard of this Joel guy before (Who is he? Does he really Care?), this proposal would have impressed Council. First, Joel successfully sought funding for an MVP, and delivered. Then, he wrote a very detailed execution plan for an expanded scope, posted it to Discourse, and then hustled for feedback from Nouners and Nouncillors alike. The final on-chain proposal is front-loaded with an easily digested paragraph outlining DeOwnersles, Timeline, Budget, and then the detailed proposal that follows explains exactly what the DAO will be getting for its ETH. We are looking forward to all the challenges Nerman Bot will be able to help solve within Nouns DAO discord (including several applications for Nouncil), as well as the other websites and bots thatCouncillorsm will build to help proliferate the meme. Nouncil is proud to have sponsored this Proposal (our first, after our own) and we wish Joel luck with the vote, and hopefully soon, with building out all these awesome tools for Nouns.GermanCouncilCouncil

Positive

Positive

This could be big

Neutral

Neutral

No details on how ETH will be spent, no breakdown. Cmon.C'mon

Negative

Negative

This feels very expensive while not compelling or impactful enough

Negative

Negative

I think there's just too much important information missing from this proposal.

Neutral

Negative

Feels like little nouns want to buy at a respectable price, so this makes more sense.

Neutral

Positive

Like the construct of upfront payment + revokable stream

Neutral

Positive

See prop 82

Neutral

Neutral

I like books

Positive

Positive

Voting against; In favor of setting the precedent that DAO-to-DAO Noun transactions happen at FMV

Neutral

Positive

Council <3 Lil Nouns We prefer Prop 82 with a sale price based on FMV.

Neutral

Positive

Trying to reach 42-69

Neutral

Neutral

Theoretically Lil Nouns doesn't NEED this proposal to buy a Noun but given that context I think it can be a good on-chain gesture to invite little nouners to buy a noun and join our DAO so voting FOR.owners

Neutral

Positive

This proposal really makes me smile and appreciate how great permissionless collaboration is.

Positive

Positive

Lossy.ETH

Neutral

Neutral

It seems that the reason we're discussing gifting a noun to an extension project, which is unprecedented (we never discussed a gift nor discount to shared, goop, etc), is that we were allocated 10% of future NFT supply (a new thing that Lil Nouns did). I'm voting AGAINST since I'm opposed to sending a signal etc.present and future nouns extensions that we value receiving NFT supply allocation in a special way. Receiving someone else's NFTs is kind of a headache. We're suddenly put into the position of having to make asset owner decisions (should we hold or sell) and in some cases such as this one we might have added governance responsibilities as well (e.g. have 10% responsibility of lil nouns' future). So unless we have some easy DAO level consensus on regularly selling the newly received NFTs, we're likely looking at the duties of holding onto an illiquid asset while incurring more DAO governance overhead. One might say that if we start receiving a lot of NFTs this way then some mlittlet really pop and have liquid markets and we might be able to experience some real ETH treasury gains through it. But if we really believed in that then we could have always bought new noun extension NFTs as pure investors with our ETH. I believe we have yet to do that because we don't think ourselves as NFT investors (even if the scope is limited to nouns extensions) and don't think that is where we create the most value from our attention. An arrangement that we'd much rather prefer than being gifted NFT supply is a nouns extension buying Nouns with their treasury. In this arrangement, we get ETH and likely some governance participation as well, both things that we really like and no added responsibilities that we don't like. I'm not saying that we should be stingy or completely self centered in a short term way. I think Lil Nouns is a brilliant experiment and love that we're for example spinning up a lil nouns prop house and sending ETH their way to help bootstrap builders there, etc. I just think that , andrding NFT supply gifting over other acts such as buying nouns or participating in our governance (which both sharkdao and goop have done) sends the wrong message that is against our incentives. We want extensions to buy Nouns, submit proposals, and participate in our governance! Giving us assets for free can be nice but comparatively is meh. nouns'self-centeredlittleFurthermore, Ishared

Neutral

Positive

Join the World Call on Thursdays at 9:30am UTC to work on more proposals together!

Positive

Positive

Love your art!

Positive

Positive

Brandon FTW

Positive

Positive

Dilutes the nouns brand and value

Negative

Positive

Lil nouns nom nouns for a clean meme

Neutral

Positive

Brandon's Nourish art is really special, and the world needs to see more of it. wen NounciWenr Brandon? https://tenor.com/bSR8O.gifCouncillor

Positive

Positive

As a representative council of mostly Nourish extension projects, Nouncil thinks Proposal 82 is a more rCouncilble precedent to set in this regard. There are many ways that Nounish projects may (and do) give back to the DAO and pay the spirit of CC0 forward, and we thinNourish should be careful not to unduly reward certain types of contributions over others. Goes without saying, we love Nouncillor Dot and his Lil Nouns, and are excited to see all his success since launch. We are also excited to see an historic DAO-DAO Noun purchase if this Proposal is successful!CouncillorDOO-DOO

Neutral

Positive

Although I think participating and winning a Nouns auction would be a fun achievement for lil nouns, I'm not opposed to this DAO to DAOlittlele.

Neutral

Positive

Great way to get Nouns into an IRL brand.

Positive

Positive

YES!

Positive

Positive

Brushed was thinking of proposing something similar and would love to help ☕️

Positive

Positive

Coffee good || new, most ppl just buy cheap-ass coffee anyway (ノಠ益ಠ)ノ彡┻━┻ || coffee good

Neutral

Positive

☕️

Neutral

Neutral

Continue to feel that small grants' committee funding has been one of the highest ROI funding proposals consistently. Funding Lil Noun's contract deployment before it was an obvious winner is one of many such examples. Really glad with the fact that alonglad about-chain DAO proposals and prop house we still have a discretionary pool of capital with an open mandate handled by committed nouners to swiftly act on all things that already have or have the potential to proliferate nouns. owners

Positive

Positive

I see both sides on this one. Appreciate the idea, founders, and efforts to proliferate the brand, but this seems like a lot of capital to allocate to something that likely doesn't require de-risking. this is arequired e-riskingard business model and nouns are already providing brand assets and a market of consumers for the product. unsure if we should also pay 100% of initial setup and inventory ThissUnsure

Neutral

Positive

We ⌐◨-◨ coffee

Neutral

Neutral

Is great having comments. This is an EIP

Neutral

Positive

I think this should always be a component of the meme proliferation strategy, rewarding those who take permissionless action is extremely nourish, imoIMO

Positive

Positive

What 40 said

Neutral

Neutral

We overall support this team. They did a great job on their last similar project. Nouns coffee is something that has been talked about a lot and this is the first serious effort to make it happen. We trust the product and branding will be high quality, so for these reasons we are voting Yes. One piece of feedback that did come up during Councillor discussion was that we would like to see Proposals (especially those with relatively substantial asks) go up on Discourse for at least a couple days for discussion and feedback before going on chain. This way Nouncil (and the broader Nouns community) has time to ask clarifying questions about budget, success metrics, etc. We are voting YES here in spite of this not having been done in this case, but would encourage future Proposers to consider this route when possible. Bycouple ofay, we also welcome Proposers to Post their ideas in Nouncil for feedback, or ask to have it added to our weekly call Agenda. CouncilCouncil

Positive

Positive

Nouns coffee, FOMO nouns, nom nom nnomream scenario. we like tDreamffee. SharkDAO WeShared

Neutral

Positive

Ultimately, Council was not able to reach a consensus on this Prop so we are v, song to Abstain. After the majority vote to Abstain (16), all other votes cast were against (12.) Overall, in discussions, we felt that there are too many unknowns/unclear items WRT the case. Even if the Plaintiffs' motivations could be politically motivated, it seems PT may have indeed broken some lottery and/or banking laws in NY, or at least, it is far from a sure thing that they didn't. Moreover, it was mentioned that this should probably have been a planned-for eventuality for such a protocol (to be sued by the State) and Nouncil worries about the precedent of deploying Nouns treasury to fundCouncilind of predictable legal battle (hat tip Wag.) On top of the above, this was also not a small ask (which might have found broader support.) We wish PoolTogether the best with this case, but we couldn't vote to support this Proposal at this time.Altogether

Neutral

Positive

Dutch Impressionist Vincent van Gogh once famously wrote: "Great things are done by a series of small things brought together." It's amazing that he was able to predict Nouns Small Grants more than 130 years ago. Keep up the great work Small Grants Team!

Positive

Positive

Don't know enough about this to confidently take a side

Neutral

Positive

I do not understand the legal nuances involved here and what impact they may have going forward and thus cannot, in good faith, vote in one direction or another.

Neutral

Negative

Balance

Neutral

Neutral

We think a nimble, flexible, pool of capital is important for the DAO. We would love to see more real-time transparency of the work of this pod. For example, a weekly report on the pod's discord channel on what was funded and what was reject. This way owners can give faster feedback on the pod's decisions, and builders can learn what gets funded what not.

Neutral

Positive

We don't feel nuanced enough on the legal details to make a decision to contribute so much ETH to this cause.

Neutral

Positive

Do not carry the proper knowledge on this matter to confidently vote yes or no.

Neutral

Positive

SG FTW

Positive

Positive

Fun, interesting, and nominative proposal that takes advantage of CC0, funds talented artists and furthers nounsdao awareness nounsp tier creatives. more like this please!More

Positive

Positive

Excited for art and Dada prop

Positive

Positive

Yes please print extra posters

Positive

Positive

If executed properly (which it seems like this team can do), this should be a great way to bring multiple different artist communities into the fold of nouns. I would like to make sure there is transparency in the final capital allocation to the artists though, which I’m sure this team will provide. Really looking forward to the treasure hunt.

Positive

Positive

We like the Vector

Positive

Positive

First time voter, long time builder. I like that some funds will be used to buying a Noun, therefore adding another group of people to the ecosystem. I also like to see artists get paid and am impressed with the lineup. Excited to see this happen and I hope the photos of the posters hanging up and the art images themselves will be available for others to use across other Nounish sites, if appropriate. Lastly, I’m glad thNourish is just fun. Definitely helps with spreading the meme and I like that Nouns can be associated with both high-quality art & having fun.

Positive

Positive

✅ some funds being returned to acquire a Noun ✅ proliferating the Noun meme by proxy of a highly visible event ✅ supporting talented artists with the remaining proceeds that aren't used to funnel money back into the treasury I am looking forward to seeing this proposal getting put to work.

Positive

Positive

Really excited to see this DAO-to-DAO proposal — very ⌐◨-◨ ishis

Positive

Positive

All for bringing new artistic voices to the noun verse. Also fan of building a closer relationship with VectorDAO through noun ownership. win-winVictoriaWin-win

Positive

Positive

Looking forward to seeing these posters, such a solid roster of artists. ⌐◨-◨🙏

Positive

Positive

We believe this lawsuit is a serious deterrent to legitimate crypto innovation, and several of us have personally donated to this cause. Generally we think the DAO should only engage in philanthropy when the efforts of the collective are more impactful than efforts of the individual. That may indeed be the case here, but we believe more discussion is needed to address points brought up by fellow DAO members.

Neutral

Positive

We object to the last minute modification of this proposal effectively doubling costs by making financing dilute rather than accretive. that said we believe vectorDAO to be a value add partner and are excited to have them as a part of the cThatnity. Given time constraints for this event, we choose to give VectorDAO the benefit of the doubt that they will find a way to add more value in Victoriae, and will be vetting future proposals from them with that in mind.Victoria

Neutral

Positive

Excited to see more compelling interpretation projects!

Positive

Positive

Brennan said it best so ill echo that: "I think IRL activations are fairly important to start building a real brand outside just crypto folks. Not to convert or do even get them to ever visit a website. It's really just to see the noggles and be like "hey that was cool" so when they see them again we start to build this consistent identity.gogglesplays help us build long term brand value."

Neutral

Positive

While I appreciate the changes made from feedback given I’m still not sold on the ROI given the short time frame it will be up and the mural’s website deliverable. Also, the statement that he “will attempt to leverage his network to invite some of his artist friends to hang out with him at the completed mural” doesn’t seem to mean much. No knock on the artist or proposer, that’s just my feelings based off other art-related props & grants we’ve seen that have had clearer value adds and/or were more cost-effective.

Neutral

Positive

Appreciate the intention behind this prop. I am not sold on the value proposition of spending the requested ETH here on an ephemeral piece slated to EOL by July 10. Landing pages should be substantially more affordable, too. The team looks solid, but I am struggling with the short-lived value add here (relative to cost).

Neutral

Positive

I think the team is great, and the execution would be of high quality, but the lifespan of the mural just doesn’t quite seem worth the time and funds requested for allocation. That being said, I’d vote strongly in favor of a longer term mural in a high-traffic area.

Neutral

Positive

This is cool, but I feel like it's a bit much for what we may be getting back. We are getting much more visibility with dota and thadatas less than 1/3 of the cost of this.

Neutral

Positive

Sharks like all passionate artists working on Nouns ⌐◨-◨

Neutral

Positive

Attracting world-class artists and IRL noun manifestations is very important. Plus more nounish stunourishft.nyc is valuable. A bit pricey yes. Next time I hope we have a themed prop.house for NFT.nyc and other events so we make this more competitive. NYC HouseNFTNYC, so

Neutral

Positive

Not an easy decision, but agree with some of the other comments that the ROI doesn't seem great. And just generally seems underwhelming, given the cost and comparison to other proposals. On the other hand, I'm not thrilled with voting against this proposal because, while I don't want to spend recklessly, I'm in favor of not being too restrictive with spending. However, would prefer to spend more on novel, creative ideas that spread the Nouns meme.

Neutral

Positive

Have gone back and forth on this one a number of times, but ultimately going to vote against because I think the long-tail risk of outsiders perceiving the dao as careless with its resources is greater than the long-tail opportunity cost of voting down days proposal. if the artist were more prominent, i would be willing to overlook the high overhead from the team, and if the overhead were lower, i would be more willing to fund a less prominent artist. the prototype sketch also demonstrated a relatively superficIfl level of engagement with the project. would support working with the artist under different circumstances and less time pressure.IITheWould

Neutral

Positive

Support pursuing an engagement with this artist with less time constraints and longer mural lifetime

Neutral

Positive

You're breathtaking!

Positive

Positive

It’s just so obvious. ⌐◨-◨

Neutral

Neutral

with𝐞veryaslasta, idea𝐞xcelkeep𝐭o 𝐡anexcellingry 𝐠if toortunityhandcrafto 𝐬atisfaveryifopportunityalwaystosatisfaction

Neutral

Neutral

More great memes to spread the meme. Yes, please. ⌐◨-◨

Positive

Positive

I have a tab browser open at all times with Gold's memes to facilitate the proliferation of Nouns, so this is a no-brainer for me.

Neutral

Neutral

of

Neutral

Neutral

These better be some spicy memes

Neutral

Positive