Datasets:

kjappelbaum

/

chemnlp-arxiv

like 1

# Introduction The group of colored permutations, \(G_{r,n}\), is a natural generalization of the Coxeter groups of types A (the symmetric group) and B (the hyperoctahedral group). Extensive research has been devoted to extending the enumerative combinatorics aspects and methods from the symmetric group to the group of colored permutations (see for example, and many more). It is well-known that the symmetric group \(S_n\) has a system of Coxeter generators which consists of the adjacent transpositions: \[\{(i,i+1)\mid 1 \leq i \leq n-1\}.\] The alternating subgroup, \(A_n\), which is the kernel of the sign homomorphism, is a well-known subgroup of the symmetric group of index \(2\). A pioneering work, expanding one of the fascinating branches of enumerative combinatorics, namely, the study of permutation statistics to \(A_n\), has been done by Roichman and Regev in. They defined some natural statistics which equidistribute over \(A_n\) and yielded identities for their generating functions. Brenti, Reiner, and Roichman dealt with the alternating subgroup of an arbitrary Coxeter group. They started by exploring Bourbaki's presentation and elaborated on a huge spectrum of extensions of the permutation statistics of \(S_n\) to the (general) alternating group. In this paper, we study the subgroup of \(G_{r,n}\), consisting of what we call *alternating colored permutations*, which is the analogue of the usual alternating group \(A_n\) in the colored permutation group. For every \(n \in \mathbb{N}\) and even \(r\), the mapping which sends all 'Coxeter-like' generators of \(G_{r,n}\) (see the definition in Section [2](#pre){reference-type="ref" reference="pre"}) to \(-1\) is a \(\mathbb{Z}_2\)-character, whose kernel is what we call here *the group of alternating colored permutations*, denoted by \(A_{r,n}\). We present here a generalization of Bourbaki's presentation, for \(r=4k+2\), equipped with a set of canonical words, an algorithm to find a canonical presentation for each element of the group, and a combinatorial length function. For the study of permutation statistics of \(A_n\), Regev and Roichman used a covering map from \(A_{n+1}\) to \(S_n\), which enabled them to pass parameters from \(S_n\) to the alternating group \(A_{n+1}\). In this paper, we use a similar idea, where in this time we consider the group of alternating colored permutations as a \(2^{n-1}\)-cover of the group of colored permutations of half the number of colors. We use this technique to shed a combinatorial flavor on our length function and to pass some statistics and their generating function to the group of alternating colored permutations. Note that there are two additional candidates for the group of alternating colored permutations. Namely, every \(\mathbb{Z}_2\)-character of \(G_{r,n}\) provides a kernel which deserves to be called a group of alternating colored permutations. A work in this direction which gives a profound treatment to the other two non-trivial kernels, and points out the connections between the three groups, and some interesting properties of each group separately is in progress. This paper is organized as follows. In Section [2](#pre){reference-type="ref" reference="pre"}, we gather the needed definitions on the colored permutation group, as well as some notations which we use in the sequel. A Coxeter-like presentation for the group of colored permutations, \(G_{r,n}\), is presented at the end of this section. The notion of alternating colored permutations is introduced in Section [3](#arn){reference-type="ref" reference="arn"}. We present its set of generators, and show their corresponding relations. In Section [4](#alg){reference-type="ref" reference="alg"}, we present an algorithm for writing each element as a product of the generators. A detailed analysis of that algorithm yields a set of canonical words, as well as a length function. Section [5](#proofs){reference-type="ref" reference="proofs"} is devoted to some technical proofs, as well as to the generating function of the length function. In Section [6](#cover){reference-type="ref" reference="cover"}, we present the covering map and study the structure of the cosets, thereby providing a way to decompose the length function via the quotient group. The part of the length which varies over each coset (fiber) is called *the fibral length* and is studied here in a combinatorial way. Then we provide a generating function for this parameter. In Section [7](#perm stat){reference-type="ref" reference="perm stat"}, we give some examples for using the covering map for lifting parameters from the colored permutations group of half the number of colors to the group of alternating colored permutations. # Preliminaries and notations {#pre} In this section, we gathered some notations as well as preliminary notions which will be needed for the rest of the paper. ## The group of colored permutations Here is another way to present \(G_{r,n}\): Consider the alphabet \[\Sigma=\{1,\dots,n,\bar{1},\dots,\bar{n},\dots, 1^{[r-1]},\dots,n^{[r-1]} \}\] as the set \([n]\) colored by the colors \(0,\dots,r-1\). Then, an element of \(G_{r,n}\) is a *colored permutation*, i.e., a bijection \(\pi: \Sigma \rightarrow \Sigma\) satisfying the following condition: if \(\pi \left( i^{[\alpha]} \right)=j^{[\beta]}\), then \(\pi \left( i^{[\alpha+1]} \right)=j^{[\beta+1]}\) (the addition in the exponents is taken modulo \(r\)). Using this approach, the element \(\pi=((z_1,\dots,z_n),\tau) \in G_{r,n}\) is the permutation on \(\Sigma\), satisfying \(\pi(i)=\pi(i^{[0]})=\tau(i)^{[z_{\tau(i)}]}\) for each \(1 \leq i \leq n\). For example, the element \(\pi=\left((2,1,0,3),\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 2 & 3 &4 \\ 2 & 1 & 4 &3 \end{pmatrix}\right) \in G_{3,4}\) satisfies: \(\pi(1)=2^{[1]},\pi(2)=1^{[2]},\pi(3)=4^{[3]},\pi(4)=3^{[0]}\). For an element \(\pi=(\vec{z},\tau) \in G_{r,n}\) with \(\vec{z}=(z_1,\dots,z_n)\), we write \(z_i(\pi)=z_i\), and denote \(|\pi|=(\vec{0},\tau)\). We define also \(c_i(\pi)=r-z_i(\pi^{-1})\) and \(\vec{c}(\pi)=\vec{c}=(c_1,\dots,c_n)\). Using this notation, the element \(\pi=(\vec{z},\tau)=\left((2,1,0,3),\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 2 & 3 &4 \\ 2 & 1 & 4 &3 \end{pmatrix}\right)\) satisfies \(\vec{c}=(1,2,3,0))\). We usually write \(\pi\) in its *window notation* (or *one line notation*): \(\pi=\left( a_1^{[c_1]} \cdots a_n^{[c_n]} \right)\), where \(a_i=\tau(i)\), so in our example we have: \(\pi=(2^{[1]} 1^{[2]} 4^{[3]} 3^{[0]})\) or just \(\left(\bar{2} \bar{\bar{1}} \bar{\bar{\bar{4}}} 3\right).\) Note that \(z_i\) is the color of the digit \(i\) (\(i\) is taken from the window notation), while \(c_j\) is the color of the digit \(\tau(j)\). Here, \(j\) stands for the place, whence \(i\) stands for the value. The group \(G_{r,n}\) is generated by the set of generators \({\mathcal S}=\{s_0,s_1,\dots, s_{n-1}\}\), defined by their action on the set \(\{1,\dots,n\}\) as follows: \[s_i(j)=\left\{ \begin{array}{ccc} i+1 & j=i \\ i & j=i+1 \\ j & \text{otherwise,} \end{array} \right.\] whereas the generator \(s_0\) is defined by \[s_0(j)= \left\{ \begin{array}{cc} \bar{1} & j=1 \\ j & \text{otherwise.} \end{array} \right.\] It is easy to see that the group \(G_{r,n}\) has the following 'Coxeter-like' presentation with respect to the set of generators \({\mathcal S}\): ## Some permutation statistics For \(\pi \in G_{r,n}\), define the *length* of \(\pi\) with respect to the set of generators \(\mathcal S\) to be the minimal number of generators whose product is \(\pi\). Formally: \[\ell(\pi)=\min\{r \in \mathbb{N}: \pi=s_{i_1} \cdots s_{i_r}, \mbox{for } i_1,\dots,i_r \in \{0,\dots,n-1\} \ \}.\] For any \(a,n \in \mathbb{N}\), let \(R_n(a)\) be the representative of \([a] \in \mathbb{Z}_n\) satisfying \(0 \leq a <n\). In the sequel, we will use the following operator: It is easy to see that the operator \(\oslash\) commutes with the addition operation in \(\mathbb{Z}_{\frac{r}{2}}\), i.e. \[\label{oslash commutes} ((a+b)\oslash 2) \equiv ((a\oslash 2) + (b \oslash 2)) \left({\rm mod}\ {\frac{r}{2}} \right)\] # The group of alternating colored permutations {#arn} The main target of this paper is the group of alternating colored permutations. We proceed now to its definition. Let \(\varphi\) be the function defined on the set \(\mathcal{S}\) by \(\varphi(s_i)=-1\) for any \(0 \leq i \leq n-1\). It is easy to see that for even \(r\), \(\varphi\) can be uniquely extended to a homomorphism from \(G_{r,n}\) to \(\mathbb{Z}_2\), so the following is well-defined: Since \(A_{r,n}\) is a subgroup of index \(2\), we have: \(|A_{r,n}|=\frac{r^n n!}{2}\). In this paper, we concentrate on the case \(r=4k+2\). The other case will be treated in a subsequent paper. We start by presenting a set of generators for \(A_{r,n}\) (we prove that they indeed generate the group in the next section). Define: \[{\mathcal A}=\{a_0,a_1,a_1^{-1},a_2,\dots,a_{n-1}\},\] where: \[\begin{array}{l} a_i=s_0^{\frac{r}{2}}s_i \ \ \mbox{ for } 1 \leq i \leq n-1 \\ a_0=s_0^2. \end{array}\] It is easy to see that the following translation relations hold in \(G_{r,n}\): 1. \(s_i s_j = a_i a_j \mbox{ for } i,j \in\{2,\dots, n-1\}\), 2. \(s_1 s_i = a_1^{-1} a_i \mbox{ for } i \in\{2,\dots, n-1\}\), 3. \(s_i s_1 = a_i a_1 \mbox{ for } i \geq 2\), 4. \(s_0 s_1 = a_0^{\frac{r+2}{4}} a_1\), 5. \(s_1 s_0 = a_1^{-1} a_0^{\frac{r+2}{4}}\), 6. \(a_0^{\frac{r}{2}} = 1\), 7. \(s_0 s_i = a_0^{\frac{r+2}{4}} a_i\). # The Combinatorial algorithm {#alg} In this section, we introduce an algorithm which presents each element of \(A_{r,n}\) as a product of the set of generators \(\mathcal A\) of \(A_{r,n}\) in a canonical way. Let \(\pi \in A_{r,n}\). We first refer to \(\pi\) as an element of \(G_{r,n}\) and apply the known algorithm on \(\pi\) to write it as a product of elements in \(\mathcal{S}\). In the second step, we translate that presentation into the set of generators \(\mathcal A\) of \(A_{r,n}\). The algorithm for writing \(\pi\) as a product of elements in \(\mathcal{S}\) consists of two parts: the *coloring part* and the *ordering part*. In the coloring part, we start from the identity element and color all the digits \(i\) having \(z_i \neq 0\). This part terminates with an ordered permutation \(\sigma\) with respect to the length order. In the second part, we use only generators of the set \(\mathcal{S}-\{s_0\}\) to arrive at \(\pi\) from the ordered permutation \(\sigma\). ## The coloring part {#color order} Define: \[{\rm Col}(\pi)=\{1 \leq i \leq n \mid z_i(\pi) \neq 0\},\] and \[{\rm col}(\pi)=|{\rm Col}(\pi)|.\] Note that the set \({\rm Col}(\pi)\) contains the colored digits in the image of \(\pi\), (i.e. those appearing in the window notation), and not their places. We order \({\rm Col}(\pi)\) as follows: \({\rm Col}(\pi)=\{i_1<i_2< \cdots <i_{{\rm col}(\pi)}\}\). We start with the identity element and color each digit \(i \in {\rm Col}(\pi)\) by \(z_i\) colors. This process is done according to the order of the elements in \({\rm Col}(\pi)\). We use \(s_{{i_k}-1}s_{i_k-2} \cdots s_1s_0^z\) to color the digit \(i_k\) by \(z\) colors. ## The ordering part For simplifying the presentation, in this part we start with \(\pi\) and arrive at the ordered permutation \(\sigma\), instead of continuing the algorithm from the point we have left it at the end of the coloring part. We start by pushing the element \(i_1=|\sigma|(1)\) in the window notation of \(\pi\) to its correct place. Let \(p=|\pi|^{-1}(i_1)\). The pushing is done by multiplying \(\pi\) (from the right) by the element \(u_1=s_{p-1}s_{p-2}\cdots s_1\). Now, we continue to push the other digits of \(\pi\): For each \(1 < k \leq n-2\), assuming that \(i_k=|\sigma|(k)\) is now located at position \(p\), we use the element \(s_{p-1}s_{p-2}\cdots s_k\) in order to push the digit \(i_k\) to its correct place. The algorithm described above gives a *reduced* word representing \(\pi\) in the generators of \(G_{r,n}\). This fact was proved in. The same algorithm can also be found in; see also. The word which was obtained in this way is called the *canonical decomposition* of \(\pi\). ## Translation {#Translation} Now, we translate the word obtained by the algorithm described above into a word in the generators in \(\mathcal A\): Let \(\pi \in A_{r,n}\). Use the above algorithm to write a reduced expression of \(\pi\) (in the usual generators of \(G_{r,n}\)) in the form: \(s_{i_1}s_{i_2} \cdots s_{i_{2k}}\). Divide the elements of the reduced expression into pairs: \((s_{i_1}s_{i_2}) \cdots (s_{i_{2k-1}}s_{i_{2k}})\). Now, insert \(s_0^{\frac{r}{2}} s_0^{\frac{r}{2}}\) inside each pair, as follows: \[\begin{aligned} \left( s_{i_1}s_0^{\frac{r}{2}} s_0^{\frac{r}{2}}s_{i_2} \right) \cdots \left( s_{i_{2k-1}}s_0^{\frac{r}{2}} s_0^{\frac{r}{2}}s_{i_{2k}} \right) & = & \left( s_{i_1}s_0^{\frac{r}{2}} \right) \left( s_0^{\frac{r}{2}}s_{i_2} \right) \cdots \left( s_{i_{2k-1}}s_0^{\frac{r}{2}} \right) \left( s_0^{\frac{r}{2}}s_{i_{2k}} \right) =\\ & = & a_{i_1}^{\varepsilon_{i_1}} \cdots a_{i_{2k}}^{\varepsilon_{i_{2k}}}, \end{aligned}\] where \(\varepsilon_{i_j}=1\) if \(i_j>1\), \(\varepsilon_{i_j} \in \{\pm 1\}\) if \(i_j=1\), and \(\varepsilon_{i_j} \in \left\{ 1,\dots, \frac{r}{2}-1 \right\}\) if \(i_j=0\). ## Analysis of the algorithm For analyzing the algorithm described above, we define the following sets of elements of \(G_{r,n}\) and \(A_{r,n}\). ### The coloring part {#the-coloring-part} Let \[C_1=\left\{ 1,s_0^2,s_0^4 \dots ,s_0^{r-2} \right\}=\left\{ 1,a_0,\dots,a_0^{\frac{r-2}{2}} \right\}.\] For each \(1 < i \leq n\), define for odd \(i-1\): \[\begin{aligned} C_i^0 & = & \left\{s_0s_{i-1} \cdots s_1,s_0s_{i-1} \cdots s_1s_0^2,s_0s_{i-1} \cdots s_1s_0^4,\dots,s_0s_{i-1} \cdots s_1s_0^{r-2} \right\}\\ C_i^1 & = & \left\{ 1,s_{i-1} \cdots s_1s_0,s_{i-1}\cdots s_1s_0^3,\dots,s_is_{i-1} \cdots s_1s_0^{r-1} \right\}, \end{aligned}\] or, in the language of the set \(\mathcal A\) of generators of \(A_{r,n}\): \[\begin{aligned} C_i^0 & = & \left\{ \begin{array}{l} a_0^{\frac{r+2}{4}}a_{i-1} \cdots a_1,a_0^{\frac{r+2}{4}}a_{i-1} \cdots a_1a_0,a_0^{\frac{r+2}{4}}a_{i-1} \cdots a_1a_0^2,\dots, \\ a_0^{\frac{r+2}{4}}a_{i-1} \cdots a_1a_0^{\frac{r}{2}-1} \end{array} \right\} \\ C_i^1 & = & \left\{ 1,a_{i-1} \cdots a_1^{-1},a_{i-1} \cdots a_2a_1^{-1}a_0,\dots,a_{i-1} \cdots a_1^{-1}a_0^{\frac{r}{2}-1} \right\}. \end{aligned}\] For even \(i-1\), we define: \[\begin{aligned} C_i^{0} & = & \left\{ s_0 s_{i-1} \cdots s_1s_0,s_0s_{i-1} \cdots s_1s_0^3,\dots,s_0s_{i-1} \cdots s_1s_0^{r-1} \right\}\\ C_i^1 & = & \left\{ 1,s_{i-1} \cdots s_1,s_{i-1} \cdots s_1 s_0^2,s_{i-1} \cdots s_1 s_0^4,\dots,s_{i-1} \cdots s_1s_0^{r-2} \right\}, \end{aligned}\] or, in the language of the set \(\mathcal A\) of generators of \(A_{r,n}\): \[\begin{aligned} C_i^0 & = & \left\{ \begin{array}{l} a_0^{\frac{r+2}{4}}a_{i-1} \cdots a_1^{-1},a_0^{\frac{r+2}{4}}a_{i-1} \cdots a_1^{-1}a_0, a_0^{\frac{r+2}{4}}a_{i-1} \cdots a_1^{-1}a_0^2,\dots ,\\ a_0^{\frac{r+2}{4}}a_{i-1} \cdots a_1^{-1}a_0^{\frac{r}{2}-1} \end{array} \right\}\\ C_i^1 & = & \left\{ 1,a_{i-1} \cdots a_1, a_{i-1} \cdots a_1a_0,a_{i-1} \cdots a_1a_0^2,\dots,a_{i-1} \cdots a_1a_0^{\frac{r}{2}-1} \right\}. \end{aligned}\] Define also: \[C_i = C_i^0 \cup C_i^1 \mbox{ and } C_{n+1}=\left\{ 1,a_0^{\frac{r+2}{4}} \right\}.\] Let \(\pi \in A_{r,n}\). Write \(\pi\) as a product of the generators of \(G_{r,n}\) in the canonical form described above. If there is no coloring part, then \(\pi \in A_n\) (the classical alternating group in \(S_n\)), so its expression contains an even number of generators from the set \(\{s_1,\dots,s_{n-1}\}\). We can easily make the pairing by the relations mentioned above. The length of such an expression is clearly \({\rm inv}(\pi)\) (note that in this case, it does not matter whether we use the length order or the usual order). Otherwise, we start with the coloring part. Denote by \(i=i_1\) the smallest colored digit in the window notation of \(\pi\), and by \(z=z_{i_1}\) its color. We divide our treatment into four cases: 1. **\(i-1\) and \(z\) are both even**: In this case, we translate \(s_{i-1} \cdots s_1\) to \(a_{i-1} \cdots a_1\) and \(s_0^{z}\) to \(a_0^{\frac{z}{2}}\), so the contribution of this sub-expression is \(i-1+R_{\frac{r}{2}}(\frac{z}{2})=i-1+R_{\frac{r}{2}}(z \oslash{2})\). We have used \(a_{i-1} \cdots a_1 a_0^{\frac{z}{2}} \in C_i\). 2. **\(i-1\) is even and \(z\) is odd**: [\[i-1 even zi odd\]]{#i-1 even zi odd label="i-1 even zi odd"} In this case, we translate \(s_{i-1} \cdots s_1 s_0^{z-1}\) to \(a_{i-1} \cdots a_1 a_0 ^{\frac{z-1}{2}} \in C_i\) and leave an additional generator \(s_0\) which will be treated during the coloring of the next digit, or just before the ordering part. Note that since \(\pi \in A_{r,n}\), there must be some \(s_j\), \(j \neq 0\), appearing right after the sub-expression \(s_{i-1} \cdots s_1 s_0^{z}\). In calculating the contribution of coloring the current digit (including the missing generator \(s_0\) which will be paired later), consider the sub-expression \[s_0^{z}s_j=s_0^{\frac{r}{2}}s_0^{z+\frac{r}{2}} s_j=a_0^{\frac{z+\frac{r}{2}}{2}} s_0^{\frac{r}{2}} s_j=a_0^{\frac{z+\frac{r}{2}}{2}} a_j=a_0^{z \oslash 2} a_j.\] Hence, \(i\) contributes \(i-1+R_{\frac{r}{2}}(z \oslash 2)\). We have used \[a_{i-1} \cdots a_1 a_0^{\frac{z-1}{2}} \in C_i,\] and note that in the next colored digit, we complete the remaining \(a_0^{\frac{r+2}{4}}\) since \(z \oslash 2=\frac{z-1}{2}+\frac{r+2}{4}\). If \(i\) is the last colored digit, then the term \(a_0^{\frac{r+2}{4}}\in C_{n+1}\) will be chosen from the set \(C_{n+1}\). 3. **\(i-1\) and \(z\) are both odd**: In this case, the sub-expression \(s_{i-1} \cdots s_2\) will be translated to \(a_{i-1} \cdots a_{2}\) and \(s_1 s_0^{z}\) will be written as \(s_1 s_0^{\frac{r}{2}} s_0^{z+\frac{r}{2}}=a_1^{-1}a_0^{z \oslash 2}\). This expression contributes \(i-1+R_{\frac{r}{2}}(z \oslash 2)\) to the length of \(\pi\), and we have used \[a_{i-1} \cdots a_2 a_1^{-1}a_0^{z \oslash 2} \in C_i.\] 4. **\(i-1\) is odd and \(z\) is even**: Here, again, the sub-expression \(s_{i-1}\cdots s_2\) will be translated to \(a_{i-1} \cdots a_2\) and \(s_1s_0^{z-1}\) will be translated to \(a_1^{-1}a_0^{\frac{z-1+\frac{r}{2}}{2}}=a_1^{-1}a_0^{(z-1) \oslash 2}\), so we use: \[a_{i-1} \cdots a_2 a_1^{-1} a_0^{(z-1) \oslash 2} \in C_{i},\] and leave an additional generator \(s_0\) which will be paired with some \(s_j\) during the coloring of the next digit or just before the ordering part. In order to calculate the contribution of coloring this digit to the length of \(\pi\) (including the missing generator \(s_0\) which will be paired later), we borrow the generator \(s_j\) appearing just after the coloring expression of the current digit: \(s_1s_0^{z}s_j=s_1s_0^{\frac{r}{2}}s_0^{z+\frac{r}{2}}s_j\). Since we wrote: \(s_1s_0^{\frac{r}{2}}=a_1^{-1}\), we are left with \(s_0^{z+\frac{r}{2}}s_j=a_0^{z \oslash 2}\). The contribution in this case is again \(i-1+R_{\frac{r}{2}}(z \oslash 2)\). Now, since \[z \oslash 2 \equiv \left( (z-1) \oslash 2+\frac{r+2}{4} \right) \left( {\rm mod} \ {\frac{r}{2}} \right),\] we take \[a_{i-1} \cdots a_1^{-1} a_0^{(z-1) \oslash 2} \in C_i\] and the remaining \(a_0^{\frac{r+2}{4}}\) will be taken from the next colored digit or from \(C_{n+1}\) (as in case (2)). Now, we apply the same procedure to the next colored digits, but note that there might be a situation in which the expression coloring the digit \(j\) is \(s_0s_{j-1}s_{j-2} \cdots\), due to our debt of the generator \(s_0\) from the preceding colored digit, so the cases might be switched after converting \(s_0 s_j\) to \(a_0^{\frac{r+2}{4}}a_{j-1}\). The following example will illuminate the situation. ### The ordering part We turn now to the ordering part. For \(1 \leq k \leq n-1\), define the sets \(O_k\) as follows: \[\begin{aligned} O_1 & = & \left\{s_{i} s_{i-1}\cdots s_1 s_0^{\frac{r}{2}\varepsilon} \mid 1\leq i\leq n-1,\ \ \varepsilon \equiv i ({\rm mod} \ 2)\right\} \cup \{ 1 \}=\\ & = &\{a_i a_{i-1}\cdots a_1^{1-2\varepsilon} \mid 1 \leq i \leq n-1,\ \ \varepsilon \equiv i ({\rm mod}\ 2) \}\cup \{1\}, \end{aligned}\] and for \(2 \leq k \leq n-1\): \[\begin{aligned} O_k & = & \left\{s_{i} s_{i-1}\cdots s_k s_0^{\frac{r}{2}\varepsilon} \mid k\leq i\leq n-1,\ \ \varepsilon \equiv (i+1-k) ({\rm mod}\ 2)\right\} \cup \{ 1 \}=\\ & = & \{a_ia_{i-1}\cdots a_k \mid k \leq i \leq n-1\} \cup \{1\}. \end{aligned}\] We start by pushing the digit \(i_1=|\sigma|(1)\) of \(\pi\) to its correct place. Let \(p_1= |\pi^{-1}|(i_1)\). The pushing will be done by multiplying \(\pi\) (from the right) by the element \(o_1 \in O_1\), where: \[o_1=\left\{\begin{array}{cc} s_{p_1-1}s_{p_1-2}\cdots s_1=a_{p_1-1} \cdots a_1 & p_1-1\ {\rm is\ even} \\ s_{p_1-1}s_{p_1-2}\cdots s_1 s_0^{\frac{r}{2}}=a_{p_1-1} \cdots a_2 a_1^{-1} & p_1-1\ {\rm is\ odd}. \end{array} \right.\] Now, we continue to push the other digits of \(\pi\): for each \(1 < k \leq n-2\), assuming that the digit \(i_k=\sigma(k)\) is now located at position \(p_k\), we use the element \(o_k \in O_k\) defined by: \[o_k=\left\{\begin{array}{cc} s_{p_k-1}s_{p_k-2}\cdots s_k=a_{p_k-1} \cdots a_k & p_k-k\ {\rm is\ even} \\ s_{p_k-1}s_{p_k-2}\cdots s_k s_0^{\frac{r}{2}}=a_{p_k-1} \cdots a_k & p_k-k\ {\rm is \ odd}, \end{array} \right.\] in order to push the digit \(i_k\) to its correct place in \(\pi\). Now, we have two possibilities: - The coloring part was completed without remainders, which means that both the coloring part and the ordering part consist of even number of \(G_{r,n}\)-generators. In this case, we choose \(1 \in C_{n+1}\), and we have that: \[\pi= \gamma_1 \cdots \gamma_n \cdot 1 \cdot o_{n-1}^{-1} \cdots o_1^{-1},\] where \(\gamma_i \in C_i\) for \(1 \leq i \leq n\), and \(o_i \in O_i\) for \(1 \leq i \leq n-1\). - The coloring part has a remainder of the generator \(s_0\). This means that the coloring part required an odd number of \(G_{r,n}\)-generators, and therefore the ordering part had an odd number of \(G_{r,n}\)-generators as well (since the sum of their lengths is even). Thus, in the ordering part, there will be a remainder of \(s_0^{\frac{r}{2}}\), so we choose \(s_0^{\frac{r}{2}} s_0 = s_0^{\frac{r}{2} +1} = a_0^{\frac{r+2}{4}} \in C_{n+1}\), and we have that: \[\pi= \gamma_1 \cdots \gamma_n \cdot a_0^{\frac{r+2}{4}} \cdot o_{n-1}^{-1} \cdots o_1^{-1},\] where \(\gamma_i \in C_i\) for \(1 \leq i \leq n\), and \(o_i \in O_i\) for \(1 \leq i \leq n-1\). In both cases, we have now: \(\pi=\sigma \cdot o_{n-1}^{-1} \cdots o_1^{-1}\), and we are done. From the above analysis we can conclude that each permutation \(\pi \in A_{r,n}\) has a *canonical decomposition* with respect to the set \(\mathcal{A}\). This is the context of the following theorem. For \(\pi \in A_{r,n}\), let \(L_A(\pi)\) be the number of generators needed to write \(\pi\) as a product of the \(A_{r,n}\)-generators by the algorithm. As a consequence of the analysis of the algorithm, we have the following result: Another consequence of the algorithm is the following criterion for an element for being in the group \(A_{r,n}\): # The presentation of \(A_{r,n}\) and its length function {#proofs} In, Dynkin-like diagrams were presented for the groups \(G_{r,n}\). Such diagrams are based on a Coxeter-like presentation. In this section, we compute a Coxeter-like presentation for \(A_{r,n}\), as well as a Dynkin-like diagram for the groups \(A_{r,n}\). ## The presentation of \(A_{r,n}\) We start with the presentation of \(A_{r,n}\). The relations defining \(A_{r,n}\) can be graphically described by the following Dynkin-like diagram, where the numbers inside the circles are the orders of the corresponding generators, an edge without a label between two circles means that the order of the multiplication of the two corresponding generators is \(3\), and an edge labeled \(2r\) between two circles means that the order of the multiplication of the two corresponding generators is \(2r\) (two circles with no connecting edge mean that the two corresponding generators commute): ## The length function Given a group \(G\), generated by a set \(A\), we denote by \(\ell_A\) the length function on \(G\) with respect to \(A\). Explicitly, for each \(\pi \in G\): \[\ell_A(\pi)=\min\{u \mid g=a_1 \cdots a_u, \mbox{ where } a_i \in A\}.\] In this section, we prove that the algorithm described above, indeed gives us a reduced word with respect to the set of generators \(\mathcal A\). In other words, we prove that for each \(\pi \in A_{r,n}\), \(\ell_{\mathcal A}(\pi)=L_A(\pi)\), where \(L_A(\pi)\) is the number of generators in the presentation of \(\pi\), obtained by the algorithm (and was computed in Theorem [\[first con\]](#first con){reference-type="ref" reference="first con"}(2)). We start with the following set of definitions: Hence, we have obtained the following corollary, which is the main result of this section: Consequently, we can easily get the generating function for the length function: # The colored alternating group as a covering group {#cover} In, a covering map \(f:A_{n+1} \rightarrow S_n\) was defined and used to lift some identities of \(S_n\) to \(A_{n+1}\). In this section, we use a similar technique with a covering map from \(A_{r,n}\) to \(G_{\frac{r}{2},n}\). Unlike the case of \(A_{n+1}\), this map is an epimorphism, and hence the kernel of this map will be combinatorially described. We also present a section \(s:G_{\frac{r}{2},n} \rightarrow A_{r,n}\) which gives us a way to decompose the length function, \(\ell_{\mathcal A}(\pi)\), into two summands, one of them is constant on the coset of \(\pi\), while the other, which will be called the *fibral length*, varies over the coset. We present a nice combinatorial interpretation of the last parameter, as well as a generating function for it over each coset. In Section [7](#perm stat){reference-type="ref" reference="perm stat"}, we use this covering map to lift some identities and permutation statistics from \(G_{\frac{r}{2},n}\) to \(A_{r,n}\). Define the following projection: \[p:A_{r,n} \rightarrow G_{\frac{r}{2},n},\] as follows: if \(\pi=\left(b_1^{[c_1]} \cdots b_n^{[c_n]}\right)\), then: \[p(\pi)=\left(b_1^{[c_1 \oslash 2]} \cdots b_n^{[c_n \oslash 2]}\right).\] Then, we have: We emphasize the following two observations, which can be concluded from the proof of the previous theorem, for a future use. The following obvious lemma presents the action of \(p\) on the generators of \(A_{r,n}\): We introduce the following section of the covering map \(p\): Define \[s: G_{\frac{r}{2},n} \rightarrow A_{r,n}\] as follows: if \(\pi=\left(p_1^{[c_1]} \cdots p_n^{[c_n]}\right)\) and \(p_j=1\), then: \[\pi_0=s(\pi)=\left\{\begin{array}{cc} \left(p_1^{[2c_1]} \cdots p_j^{[2c_j]} \cdots p_n^{[2c_n]}\right) & {\rm inv}(|\pi|)\equiv 0 ({\rm mod}\ 2) \\ \left(p_1^{[2c_1]} \cdots p_j^{\left[ 2c_j+\frac{r}{2} \right]} \cdots p_n^{[2c_n]}\right) & {\rm inv}(|\pi|) \equiv 1 ({\rm mod}\ 2), \end{array}\right.\] where the computations are made modulo \(r\). It is easy to verify that \(p \circ s={\rm Id}\). ## The fibral length For each \(\pi \in A_{r,n}\), the length function of \(\pi\) with respect to the set of generators \(\mathcal A\) can be decomposed into two summands. The first summand is the length of \(p(\pi)\) as an element in \(G_{\frac{r}{2},n}\), which is obviously invariant on the fiber of \(\pi\). The second summand, which varies along the fiber, will be called the *fibral length*. As will be shown in this section, it has a nice combinatorial interpretation. We start with the definition of the *fibral length*. For \(\pi \in G_{r,n}\), denote \(c(\pi)=\sum\limits_{z_i(\pi)\neq 0}{(i-1)}.\) By the definition of\(\pi_0=s(p(\pi))\), we have: \[\label{c of pi minus c of pi0} c(\pi)-c(\pi_0)=\sum\limits_{\left\{i \mid z_i(\pi) = \frac{r}{2}\right\}}{(i-1)}.\] We will need the following two lemmata in the sequel: In order to make the previous proof a bit more accessible, we provide an example. Denote by \(\ell_G\) the length function of the group \(G_{\frac{r}{2},n}\). Then, we have: As a corollary, we now have by Definition [\[fibral_def\]](#fibral_def){reference-type="ref" reference="fibral_def"} and Lemma [\[l_A=l_G\]](#l_A=l_G){reference-type="ref" reference="l_A=l_G"}: ## A combinatorial interpretation of the fibral length For presenting the fibral length in a combinatorial way, we introduce the following parameter on \(A_{r,n}\). We have now: We are interested in the distribution of the fibral length of \(\pi \in A_{r,n}\) over the coset containing \(\pi\). Define: \[F(\pi)=\sum\limits_{\sigma \in p^{-1}(p(\pi))}q^{\ell_F(\sigma)}.\] It would be much easier to calculate this distribution if we would have translated Theorem [\[combinatorial lf\]](#combinatorial lf){reference-type="ref" reference="combinatorial lf"} to the language of Lehmer codes. [\[Lehmer code\]]{#Lehmer code label="Lehmer code"} Recall that the *Lehmer code* of a permutation \(\pi \in S_n\) is defined by: \[L(\pi)=\left( l_{\pi(1)} \cdots l_{\pi(n)} \right),\] where for each \(1 \leq i \leq n\), \[l_i=|\{j \mid j>i, \pi^{-1}(i)>\pi^{-1}(j)\}|.\] For example, if \(\pi=(31452) \in S_5\) (in window notation), then: \[L(\pi)=(l_3l_1l_4l_5l_2)=(20110).\] Note that this definition is slightly different from the usual definition of the Lehmer code. For \(\pi \in A_{r,n}\), let \(L(|\pi|)=(l_1 \cdots \l_n)\), and define: \[\varepsilon_i(\pi)=\left\{\begin{array}{cc} 1 & z_i(\pi)=\frac{r}{2} \\ 0 & z_i(\pi) \neq \frac{r}{2}. \end{array}\right.\] The parameter \({\rm tinv}(\pi)\) can be written as: \[{\rm tinv}(\pi)=\sum\limits_{i=1}^n{l_i \varepsilon_i(\pi)},\] and Equation ([\[combinatorial lf formula\]](#combinatorial lf formula){reference-type="ref" reference="combinatorial lf formula"}) can be restated as: \[\label{Lehmer form of tinv} \ell_F(\pi)=2\sum\limits_{i=1}^n{\varepsilon_i(\pi)((i-1)-l_i}).\] The following theorem presents an expression for \(F(\pi)\), using Equation ([\[Lehmer form of tinv\]](#Lehmer form of tinv){reference-type="ref" reference="Lehmer form of tinv"}). # Some permutation statistics {#perm stat} In this section, we present some permutation statistics for the group of alternating colored permutations. ## Passing parameters from \(G_{\frac{r}{2},n}\) to \(A_{r,n}\) We exhibit now how to pass parameters defined on the full group of colored permutations of half the number of colors to the group of alternating colored permutations. In order to do that, we have to define the notion of a *fiber-fixed parameter*. By Observation [\[inside the fiber by r/2\]](#inside the fiber by r/2){reference-type="ref" reference="inside the fiber by r/2"}(1), we have the following connection between the corresponding generating functions: We give two examples offiber-fixed parameters, the first one is the flag-inversion number, and the second is the right-to-left minimum. ## The flag-inversion number The *flag-inversion number* was introduced by Foata and Han. Adin, Brenti and Roichman used it as a rank function for a weak order on the groups \(G_{r,n}\). We introduce it in \(G_{r,n}\): In, the generating function of \({\rm finv}\) over \(G_{r,n}\) was computed: We define here a version of the flag-inversion number for the alternating colored permutations whose generating function over \(A_{r,n}\) can be computed using on the covering map \(p\). It is easy to see that the parameter \({\rm finv}\) is indeed fiber-fixed, in the sense of Equation ([\[fiber-fixed\]](#fiber-fixed){reference-type="ref" reference="fiber-fixed"}). Explicitly, for each \(\pi \in A_{r,n}\), \({\rm finv}_A(\pi)={\rm finv}(p(\pi))\). Consequently, we have: ## The right-to-left minima Another parameter, which can be computed using the covering map, is the *right-to-left minima*. Regev and Roichman defined a version of the right-to-left minima for \(G_{r,n}\) as follows: They showed that the distribution of the parameter \({\rm RtlMin}\) over the full group of colored permutations is (see Proposition 5.1 in with \(L=\{0,\dots,r-1\}\)): \[\sum\limits_{\pi \in G_{r,n}}{q^{{\rm RtlMin}(\pi)}}=((r-1)q+1)((r-1)q+r+1)\cdots ((r-1)q+(n-1)r+1).\] We introduce here a version of the right-to-left minima for \(A_{r,n}\). Again, it is easy to see that \({\rm RtlMin}_A\) is fiber-fixed. Explicitly, for each \(\pi \in A_{r,n}\), we have \({\rm RtlMin}_A(\pi)={\rm RtlMin}(p(\pi))\). Hence, as an immediate corollary of Proposition 5.1 of, we get:

{'timestamp': '2014-01-23T02:05:04', 'yymm': '1401', 'arxiv_id': '1401.5568', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5568'}

# Introduction A graph is called \(\ell\)-universal if it contains every \(\ell\)-vertex graph as an induced subgraph. Universality is a well-studied graph property, for instance, the famous Erdős-Hajnal conjecture can be formulated in the following form. Recently Linial and Morgenstern asked a question of a similar flavour. Instead of forbidding large cliques and independent sets (anti-cliques) they asked, what happens if the graph \(G\) contains only *few* cliques and anticliques of a certain order \(m\). The present paper addresses this question. First, let us introduce some useful notation and terminology, most of which is standard (see e.g. ). For a graph \(G\) write \(V(G)\) and \(E(G)\) for its sets of vertices and edges, respectively. Let \(|G| = |V(G)|\) denote the *order* of \(G\) and let \(e(G) = |E(G)|\) denote its *size*. The *complement* of \(G\) is denoted by \(\overline{G}\). For a set \(S \subseteq V(G)\) put \(G[S]\) for the subgraph of \(G\) induced on the set \(S\). For a set \(S \subseteq V(G)\) and a vertex \(u \in V(G)\), let \(N_G(u, S) = \{w \in S: uw \in E(G)\}\) denote the set of neighbours of \(u\) in \(S\) and let \(d_G(u, S) = |N_G(u, S)|\) denote the *degree* of \(u\) into \(S\). We abbreviate \(N_G(u, V(G))\) to \(N_G(u)\) and \(d_G(u, V(G))\) to \(d_G(u)\). The former is referred to as the *neighbourhood* of \(u\) in \(G\) and the latter as its *degree*. We use \(d_G(u,v)\) to denote the *co-degree* of \(u\) and \(v\), that is, \(\left|N_G(u) \cap N_G(v)\right|\) and the somewhat less standard \(d_G(u,-v)\) to denote \(\left|N_G(u) \setminus N_G(v)\right|\). Often, when there is no risk of confusion, we omit the subscript \(G\) from the notation above. For graphs \(G\) and \(H\), put \(D_H(G)\) for the number of induced copies of \(H\) in \(G\) and \(p_H(G)\) for the corresponding density: \[p_H(G) = {\binom{n}{\left|H\right|}}^{-1}\cdot D_H(G) \.\] The quantity \(p_H(G)\) can be also interpreted as the probability that a randomly picked set of \(|H|\) vertices of \(G\) induces a copy of \(H\). For \(H=K_2\), a single edge, \(D_H(G)\) is simply \(e(G)\) and thus we write \(p_e(G)\) for \(p_{K_2}(G)\), the *edge density* of \(G\). For graphs of order \(3\), since they are determined up to isomorphism by their size, we write \(D_i(G)\) for \(D_H(G)\) and \(p_i(G)\) for \(p_H(G)\), where \(i = e(H)\). The vector \((p_0(G),\dots, p_3(G))\) is called the *\(3\)-local profile* of \(G\). Let \(\mathcal{G}=(G_k)_{k=1}^{\infty}\) be a sequence of graphs, where \(G_k = (V_k, E_k)\) is of order \(n_k := \left|V_k\right|\) and \(n_k\) tends to infinity with \(k\). If for some graph parameter \(\lambda\) the limit \(\lim_{k\rightarrow \infty} \lambda(G_k)\) exists, we denote it by \(\lambda(\mathcal{G})\). A sequence \(\mathcal{G}\) is said to be *\(\ell\)-universal* if \(G_k\) is \(\ell\)-universal for every sufficiently large \(k\). Linial and Morgenstern proved in that there exists a constant \(\rho = 0.159181\dots\) such that every \(\mathcal{G}\) with \(p_0(\mathcal G), p_3(\mathcal G) < \rho\) is \(3\)-universal and asked whether an analogous result holds for higher universalities. Note that our definition of *\(\ell\)-universal* sequences is slightly different from the one given in. The latter required additionally that \(p_{G_k}(H)\) be bounded away from \(0\) for each \(H\) of order \(\ell\). However for our purposes (i.e. answering Question [\[qlimo\]](#qlimo){reference-type="ref" reference="qlimo"}) these definitions are equivalent due to the induced graph removal lemma of Alon, Fischer, Krivelevich and Szegedy. It was pointed out by the second author that for every \(\ell \geq 5\) the answer to Question [\[qlimo\]](#qlimo){reference-type="ref" reference="qlimo"} is negative. Though his counterexample has already appeared in, for the sake of completeness we will repeat it in the next section of the present paper. This leaves \(\ell=4\) as the only remaining open case of Question [\[qlimo\]](#qlimo){reference-type="ref" reference="qlimo"}. Our first main result in this paper, Theorem [\[thm4univ\]](#thm4univ){reference-type="ref" reference="thm4univ"}, answers it in the affirmative, thereby settling Question [\[qlimo\]](#qlimo){reference-type="ref" reference="qlimo"} in full. Let us define a sequence of graphs \(\mathcal{G}\) to be *\(t\)-random-like*, or *tRL* for brevity, if \(p_{K_t}(\mathcal{G})=p_{\overline{K_t}}(\mathcal{G})=2^{-\binom{t}{2}}\). Our choice of terminology stems from the fact that such a sequence has approximately the same number of \(t\)-cliques and \(t\)-anticliques, that is, independent sets of size \(t\), as the random graph \(\mathcal{G}_{n,1/2}\). Note that for \(\mathcal{G}\) to be 2RL it is sufficient to have \(p_e(\mathcal{G})=1/2\). We will be mostly interested in 3RL sequences; in our terminology \(\mathcal{G}\) is 3RL if and only if \(p_0(\mathcal{G})=p_3(\mathcal{G})=1/8\). A standard diagonalisation argument shows that in order to answer Question [\[qlimo\]](#qlimo){reference-type="ref" reference="qlimo"} for \(\ell=4\) affirmatively, it suffices to prove the following assertion. Theorem [\[thm4univ\]](#thm4univ){reference-type="ref" reference="thm4univ"} is related to the *quasirandomness* of graphs as well. This is a central notion in extremal and probabilistic graph theory. It was introduced by Thomason in and was extensively studied in many subsequent papers. In particular, it was proved by Chung, Graham and Wilson (see also for more details) that if \(p_H(\mathcal{G}) = p_H(\mathcal{G}_{n, 1/2})\) holds for every graph \(H\) of order \(4\), then the same equality holds for every graph \(H\) of *any* fixed size. In the terminology of this fact is denoted by \(P_1(4)\Rightarrow P_1(s)\). On the other hand, it was pointed out in that the property \(P_1(3)\), that is, containing the "correct" number of induced copies of every \(3\)-vertex graph, is not sufficient to ensure quasirandomness. As we shall see in Section [2](#secprelim){reference-type="ref" reference="secprelim"}, \(P_1(3)\) is in fact equivalent to 3RL. Thus, our results in this paper can be viewed as the study of \(P_1(3)\). Under this viewpoint Theorem [\[thm4univ\]](#thm4univ){reference-type="ref" reference="thm4univ"} shows that, while 3RL graphs need not satisfy \(P_1(4)\), they still must contain a positive density of every possible induced \(4\)-vertex graph. Having resolved Question [\[qlimo\]](#qlimo){reference-type="ref" reference="qlimo"}, we know that 3RL implies \(4\)-universality, but is not enough to ensure \(\ell\)-universality for any larger \(\ell\). A natural follow up question to ask is, whether there still exist infinite classes of graphs \(H\) that must be contained in every 3RL sequence \(\mathcal{G}\). Cliques, paths, cycles and stars are natural candidates for such classes. We shall answer this question in the negative by providing counterexamples for each of these classes. In fact, our second main result, Theorem [\[thmoverkill\]](#thmoverkill){reference-type="ref" reference="thmoverkill"} provides, perhaps surprisingly, a counterexample for *any single* graph which is not too small. Throughout this paper \(R(k,\ell)\) will stand, as usual, for the corresponding Ramsey number (see for more background details). According to, the best currently known bounds on \(R(10,10)\) are \(798\leq R(10,10)\leq 23556\) (the standard upper bound for Ramsey numbers yields \(R(10,10)\leq\binom{10+10-2}{10-1}=48620\)). Theorem [\[thmoverkill\]](#thmoverkill){reference-type="ref" reference="thmoverkill"} combined with Theorem [\[thm4univ\]](#thm4univ){reference-type="ref" reference="thm4univ"} and the induced graph removal lemma  immediately give the following corollary. Theorem [\[thmoverkill\]](#thmoverkill){reference-type="ref" reference="thmoverkill"} and Corollary [\[cor4univ\]](#cor4univ){reference-type="ref" reference="cor4univ"} show that, for sufficiently large values of \(\ell\), having either the "correct" densities of triangles and anti-triangles or positive densities of every \(4\)-vertex graph is far from being enough to ensure \(\ell\)-universality. This goes in stark contrast with \(\mathcal{G}\) having the "correct" densities of *all* induced \(4\)-vertex graphs, which implies that \(\mathcal{G}\) is quasirandom and therefore \(\ell\)-universal for every \(\ell\). Having constructions of 3RL sequences which are only \(\ell\)-universal for very small values of \(\ell\) on the one hand and the random graph \(\mathcal{G}_{n,1/2}\) (which is \(\ell\)-universal for every fixed \(\ell\)) on the other hand, it is natural to ask, if for arbitrarily large \(\ell\) there exists a 3RL sequence which is \(\ell\)-universal but not \(f(\ell)\)-universal for some function \(f\). This would show that no fixed universality is sufficient to ensure all other universalities. Our third theorem shows that this is indeed the case in the following strong sense. The rest of this paper is organised as follows. In the next section we establish some basic properties of 3RL sequences and recall the construction of a 3RL sequence which is not \(5\)-universal. In Section \(\ref{sec4univ}\) we prove our first main result, Theorem [\[thm4univ\]](#thm4univ){reference-type="ref" reference="thm4univ"}, by considering each 'forbidden' \(4\)-vertex subgraph individually and applying different methods in different cases. In Section [4](#seclarge){reference-type="ref" reference="seclarge"} we prove our second main result, Theorem [\[thmoverkill\]](#thmoverkill){reference-type="ref" reference="thmoverkill"}. This will be achieved through constructing a 3RL sequence in which no graph contains a clique of size \(10\); we think that this construction is also of independent interest. In Section [5](#sechigh){reference-type="ref" reference="sechigh"} we prove Theorem [\[thmarbitrary\]](#thmarbitrary){reference-type="ref" reference="thmarbitrary"} by adapting a construction of Chung, Graham and Wilson from their seminal paper on quasirandomness. Finally, in Section [6](#secdisc){reference-type="ref" reference="secdisc"} we state a number of open questions and outline some possible extensions of our results. # Preliminaries {#secprelim} Goodman's Theorem gives a formula for the number of triangles and anti-triangles in a graph \(G=(V,E)\) of order \(n\): \[\label{eq: 1} D_0(G) + D_3(G) = \frac{1}{2}\left[-\binom{n}{3}+\sum_{v \in V} \left[\binom{d_{G} (v)}{2}+ \binom{d_{\overline{G}}(v)}{2}\right]\right] \.\] For densities this translates into \[p_0(G) + p_3(G) = \frac{\sum_{v \in V} \left[\binom{d_{G} (v)}{2}+ \binom{d_{\overline{G}} (v)}{2}\right]}{2\binom{n}{3}}-\frac{1}{2} \.\] Since \(d_G(v)+d_{\overline{G}}(v)=n-1\) for every \(v\), and due to the convexity of binomial coefficients, the minimal value of \(D_0+D_3\) is achieved whenever the degree of each vertex \(v\) is as close to \(n/2\) as possible, resulting in \(p_0+p_3\) being asymptotically \(1/4\). This is known as *Goodman's bound*. Consequently, let us call \(\mathcal{G}\) a *Goodman sequence* if \((p_0+p_3)(\mathcal{G})=1/4\); note that we do not require the existence of the individual limits \(p_0(\mathcal{G})\) and \(p_3(\mathcal{G})\). Needless to say that 3RL sequences are Goodman. Applying a common abuse of terminology, we will talk about Goodman and 3RL *graphs* referring to respective sequences of graphs. Notice that, since \(D_H(G)=D_{\overline{H}}(\overline{G})\), a graph \(G\) is Goodman (respectively 3RL) if and only if \(\overline{G}\) is Goodman (respectively 3RL). A vertex \(v\) of a graph \(G\) on \(n\) vertices is said to be *\(\epsilon\)-ordinary* if \(\left|d_G(v)-n/2\right|<\epsilon n\) and *\(\epsilon\)-exceptional* otherwise. Occasionally we will suppress the \(\epsilon\) in the above notation if there is no ambiguity. The following fact is an immediate consequence of Goodman's Theorem. It asserts that a Goodman graph is essentially \(n/2\)-regular. Note that, in particular, Goodman graphs are 2RL, thus "Goodman" can be considered an intermediate level between 2RL and 3RL. This was already pointed out by Chung, Graham and Wilson ("\(P_1(3)\Rightarrow P_0 \Rightarrow P_1(2)\)" in their terminology; Corollary [\[cor3rl\]](#cor3rl){reference-type="ref" reference="cor3rl"} below states that \(P_1(3)\) and 3RL are equivalent). Conversely, it is easy to see that every \(\mathcal{G}\) satisfying the above is Goodman. In other words, Proposition [\[propgood\]](#propgood){reference-type="ref" reference="propgood"} gives an alternative characterisation of Goodman sequences. The next lemma and its corollary can be viewed as a strengthening of the \(3\)-universality result from (although, unlike Linial and Morgenstern, we do not optimise the error term \(\varepsilon\)). It provides additional information about the \(3\)-local profile of Goodman graphs, asserting that it is determined completely by \(p_0\) (and, equivalently, by \(p_3\)). As an immediate consequence, we determine the \(3\)-local profile of 3RL graphs. In other words, the \(3\)-local profile of a 3RL graph mirrors that of the random graph \(\mathcal{G}_{n,1/2}\), justifying our choice of terminology. The following construction from is known as the *iterated blow-up* (see e.g. ) and demonstrates that 3RL graphs need not be \(5\)-universal. Let \(G_1 \cong C_5\) be a \(5\)-cycle. Given \(G_k\), construct \(G_{k+1}\) as follows. Take a \(5\)-*blow-up* of \(G_k\) (that is, replace every vertex \(v\) of \(G_k\) by \(5\) new vertices \(v_1,\dots, v_5\) and draw an edge between \(u_i\) and \(v_j\) if and only if there was an edge between \(u\) and \(v\)), and add a \(5\)-cycle within each set \(v_1,\dots,v_5\). Alternatively, \(G_{k+1}\) can be constructed by taking a \(5^k\)-blow-up of \(C_5\) and adding a copy of \(G_k\) on each partition class. It is not hard to check that no \(G_k\) contains an induced path on \(5\) vertices. In order to see that \(\mathcal{G}\) is 3RL one can either calculate the densities directly (as in ) or observe that \(\mathcal{G}\) is a sequence of self-complementary \(\left\lfloor n/2\right\rfloor\)-regular graphs, which by Goodman's Theorem yields \(p_0(\mathcal{G}) = p_3(\mathcal{G}) = 1/8\). Note that this construction also shows that for every \(\ell \geq 5\) and every \(r \geq 6\) there exist arbitrarily large 3RL graphs which do not contain the path \(P_{\ell}\) of length \(\ell-1\) or the cycle \(C_r\) as induced subgraphs. This is because any graph which contains an induced \(P_\ell\) for some \(\ell \geq 5\) or an induced \(C_r\) for some \(r \geq 6\) contains an induced \(P_5\). The case of the \(5\)-cycle remains open. # Proof of Theorem [\[thm4univ\]](#thm4univ){reference-type="ref" reference="thm4univ"} {#sec4univ} We have to show that a sufficiently large 3RL graph \(G\) contains each graph of order \(4\) as an induced subgraph. Note that, in contrast to Corollary [\[cor3rl\]](#cor3rl){reference-type="ref" reference="cor3rl"}, we cannot expect the density of \(H\) in \(G\) to be random-like for every graph \(H\) on 4 vertices. Indeed, it is well-known (see e.g. Theorem 9.3.1 in ) that such graphs are quasirandom and thus, in particular, \(\ell\)-universal for any fixed \(\ell\). Since \(G\) is 3RL if and only if \(\overline{G}\) is, and the induced subgraphs of the latter are precisely the complements of induced subgraphs of the former, it suffices to split all \(4\)-vertex graphs into complementary pairs (the graph \(P_4\), the path of length three, is self complementary) and prove containment for one graph \(H\) from each pair. Thus we need only consider the following \(6\) cases: - \(H=K_4\), the complete \(4\)-vertex graph - \(H=K_4^-\), the complete graph with one edge missing - \(H=C_4\), the \(4\)-cycle - \(H=T^+\), a triangle with a pendant edge - \(H=K_{1,3}\), the star (also known as the claw) - \(H=P_4\), the path of length 3 While the graphs above are listed in order of decreasing number of edges, we will consider them in a different order, starting from what we believe is the simplest case and finishing with the most difficult. In each of the cases the containment of \(H\) is proved by contradiction, assuming initially that \(\mathcal{G}\) is 3RL and \(H\)-free (remember that we are always looking for an *induced* copy of \(H\)). ## Case 1: \(H =T^+\) {#case-1-h-t .unnumbered} It follows by Proposition [\[propgood\]](#propgood){reference-type="ref" reference="propgood"} that, for every \(\epsilon > 0\) and sufficiently large \(n\), if \(G \in \mathcal{G}\) is a graph on \(n\) vertices, then it contains at most \(\epsilon n\) exceptional vertices. The set of all exceptional vertices of \(G\) can intersect at most \(\epsilon n^3\) triangles. Since \(G\) is 3RL, it contains \((1/48+o(1))n^3\) triangles and so, for sufficiently large \(n\), there must exist \(\epsilon\)-ordinary vertices \(u\), \(v\) and \(w\) which form a triangle \(T\) in \(G\). Since \(G\) is \(T^+\)-free, for any \(x \in V(G) \setminus \{u,v,w\}\) we must have \(d_G(x, T) \in \{0,2,3\}\). We partition the vertices of \(V(G) \setminus \{u,v,w\}\) into two sets \(X = \{x \in V(G) \setminus \{u,v,w\}: d_G(x, T) = 0\}\) and \(Y = \{x \in V(G) \setminus \{u,v,w\}: d_G(x, T) \in \{2,3\}\}\). Since \(u\), \(v\) and \(w\) are ordinary, on average, a vertex \(x \in V(G) \setminus \{u,v,w\}\) will have \(3/2 + o(1)\) neighbours in \(T\). Therefore, we must have \(n/4-o(n) \leq |X| \leq n/2 + o(n)\) and \(n/2-o(n) \leq |Y| \leq 3n/4 + o(n)\). Let \(x \in X\) and \(y \in Y\) be arbitrary vertices. Assume without loss of generality that \(\{u,v\} \subseteq N_G(y, T)\). We conclude that \(x\) and \(y\) are not adjacent in \(G\) as otherwise the vertices \(x, y, u\) and \(v\) would form an induced copy of \(T^+\) in \(G\). Since \(x\) and \(y\) were arbitrary, it follows that there are no edges of \(G\) between \(X\) and \(Y\). Since \(|X| \geq n/4-o(n)\) and at most \(\epsilon n\) vertices of \(G\) are exceptional, there exists some ordinary \(x \in X\). Because of \(N_G(x) \subseteq X\), it follows that \(|X| = n/2 + o(n)\). Finally, since all but at most \(\epsilon n\) vertices of \(X\) are ordinary and each of them has degree \(n/2 + o(n)\) in \(X\), we conclude that \(e(G[X]) \geq \binom{n/2}{2}-o(n^2)\). A similar argument shows that \(|Y| = n/2 + o(n)\) and that \(e(G[Y]) \geq \binom{n/2}{2}-o(n^2)\). Counting anti-triangles in \(G\), it follows that \(D_0(G) = o(n^3)\) and thus \(p_0(G) = 0\), contrary to our assumption that \(G\) is 3RL. ## Case 2: \(H = K_4^-\) {#case-2-h-k_4- .unnumbered} As in Case 1, consider a triangle \(T=\left\{u,v,w\right\}\) where \(u\), \(v\) and \(w\) are ordinary vertices. Since \(G\) is \(K_4^-\)-free, for any \(x \in V(G) \setminus \{u,v,w\}\) we must have \(d_G(x, T) \in \{0,1,3\}\). We partition the vertices of \(V(G)\) into two sets \(X = \{x \in V(G) \setminus \{u,v,w\}: d_G(x, T) \in \{0,1\}\}\) and \(Y = V(G) \setminus X\). Since \(u\), \(v\) and \(w\) are ordinary, on average a vertex \(x \in V(G) \setminus \{u,v,w\}\) will have \(3/2 + o(1)\) neighbours in \(T\). Therefore, we must have \(n/2-o(n) \leq |X| \leq 3n/4 + o(n)\) and \(n/4-o(n) \leq |Y| \leq n/2 + o(n)\). Considering \(u\), \(v\) and arbitrary \(x, y \in Y \setminus \{u,v\}\), we deduce that \(x\) and \(y\) are adjacent in \(G\), for otherwise \(u\) ,\(v\), \(x\) and \(y\) would form an induced copy of \(K_4^-\) in \(G\). It follows that \(G[Y]\) is a clique. Let \(z \in X\) be an arbitrary vertex and assume without loss of generality that \(\{z, u\} \notin E(G)\). Let \(y_1, y_2 \in Y \setminus \{u\}\) be arbitrary vertices. If \(\{z, y_1\} \in E(G)\) and \(\{z, y_2\} \in E(G)\), then \(G[\{z, y_1, y_2, u\}]\) is an induced copy of \(K_4^-\) in \(G\). It follows that \(d_G(x, Y) \leq 1\) for every \(x \in X\). By Proposition [\[propgood\]](#propgood){reference-type="ref" reference="propgood"} \(G\) is essentially \(n/2\)-regular and thus we must have \(n/2-o(n) \leq |X|, |Y| \leq n/2 + o(n)\) and \(e(G[X]) \geq \binom{n/2}{2}-o(n^2)\). Similarly to Case 1, it follows that \(p_0(G) = 0\), contrary to our assumption that \(G\) is 3RL. ## Case 3: \(H = K_4\) {#case-3-h-k_4 .unnumbered} Let \(\mathcal{G'}\) be any Goodman (not necessarily 3RL) sequence of \(K_4\)-free graphs. Observe that \(G'\) being \(K_4\)-free is equivalent to \(N_{G'}(v)\) being triangle-free for every \(v \in V(G')\). Therefore, by Mantel's Theorem, \(e(G'[N(v)]) \leq d(v)^2/4\) for every \(v \in V(G')\). Since \(\mathcal{G'}\) is Goodman, it follows by Proposition [\[propgood\]](#propgood){reference-type="ref" reference="propgood"} that the neighbourhoods of all but \(o(n)\) vertices of \(G'\in \mathcal{G'}\), span at most \((n/2+o(n))^2/4 = n^2/16+o(n^2)\) edges. Since \(e(G'[N_{G'}(v)])\) is precisely the number of triangles of \(G'\) that include \(v\), a double counting of the edges in all neighbourhoods shows that \[3D_3 = \sum_{v \in V(G')} e(G'[N(v)]) \leq \sum_{v \in V(G')} d(v)^2/4 = n \cdot \frac{n^2}{16} + o(n^3) =\left(\frac{3}{8} + o(1)\right) \binom{n}{3} \.\] Hence, for any \(K_4\)-free Goodman sequence \(\mathcal{G'}\) the value \(p_3(\mathcal{G'})\), if it exists, is at most \(1/8\), with equality attained only when \(e(G'[N(v)]) = (1-o(1)) d(v)^2/4\) holds for all but \(o(n)\) vertices \(v \in V(G')\). Conversely, \(\mathcal{G}\) being 3RL implies that equality must be attained, whence we conclude that \(e(G[N(v)]) = (1-o(1)) d(v)^2/4\) holds for all but \(o(n)\) vertices \(v \in V(G)\). Structural information on such 'nearly extremal' graphs is provided by the Erdős-Simonovits stability Theorem which, in this particular case and combined with the above, asserts that there exists a set \(U \subseteq V(G)\) of order \((1-o(1)) n\) such that for every \(v \in U\) we have \(d_G(v) = n/2 + o(n)\) and the neighbourhood \(N(v)\) admits a bipartition into parts \(N_1(v)\) and \(N_2(v)\) such that \(|N_1(v)|, |N_2(v)| = n/4 + o(n)\), there are \(o(n^2)\) edges within each partition class and \((1-o(1)) n^2/16\) edges between the two classes. Let \(v \in U\) be an arbitrary vertex. It follows by the above that there exists a vertex \(u \in U \cap N_1(v)\) such that \(d_G(u, N_2(v)) = n/4 + o(n)\) and \(d_G(u, N_1(v)) = o(n)\) (recall that almost every vertex has these properties). Let \(B = N_G(u) \setminus N_G(v)\); note that \(|B| = n/4 + o(n)\). Since \(u \in U\), its neighbourhood \(N_G(u)\) must induce an essentially complete bipartite graph with both parts of order \(n/4 + o(n)\). Since \(N_2(u) := N_2(v) \cap N_G(u)\) is of order \(n/4 + o(n)\) and contains \(o(n^2)\) edges, up to \(o(n)\) changes, the only way to achieve this is by taking the bipartition to be \(N_G(u) = B \cup N_2(u)\). Let \(w \in U \cap N_2(u)\) be a vertex such that \(d_G(w, N_1(v)) = n/4 + o(n)\) and \(d_G(w, B) = n/4 + o(n)\); by the above, almost every vertex of \(U \cap N_2(u)\) has these properties. Since \(w \in U\), its neighbourhood \(N_G(w)\) must induce an essentially complete bipartite graph with both parts of order \(n/4 + o(n)\). Up to \(o(n)\) changes, the only way to achieve this is by taking the bipartition to be \(N_G(w) = B \cup N_1(v)\). We conclude that the sets \(N_1(v)\), \(N_2(u)\) and \(B\) are of size \(n/4 + o(n)\) each and \(G[N_1(v) \cup N_2(u) \cup B]\) is essentially an \(n/2\)-regular tripartite graph. Let \(X = N_1(v) \cup N_2(u) \cup B\) and let \(Y = U \setminus X\). On the one hand, \(|Y| = n/4 + o(n)\) and the degree of every vertex in \(Y\) is \(n/2 + o(n)\) entailing that there are \(\Omega(n^2)\) edges between \(X\) and \(Y\). On the other hand, all but \(o(n)\) vertices of \(X\) have degree \(n/2 + o(n)\) in \(G\) and in \(G[X]\) entailing that there are \(o(n^2)\) edges between \(X\) and \(Y\). This is clearly a contradiction. ## Case 4: \(H = K_{1,3}\) {#case-4-h-k_13 .unnumbered} Let \(\mathcal{G'}\) be a Goodman sequence of \(K_{1,3}\)-free graphs. Note that \(G'\) being \(K_{1,3}\)-free is equivalent to \(N_{G'}(v)\) being anti-triangle-free for every \(v \in V(G')\), that is, the non-edges in \(N_{G'}(v)\) must not form a triangle. Similarly to Case 3, it follows from Mantel's Theorem and Proposition [\[propgood\]](#propgood){reference-type="ref" reference="propgood"} that the neighbourhoods of all but \(o(n)\) vertices of \(G'\), span at most \((n/2+o(n))^2/4 = n^2/16+o(n^2)\) non-edges. Double counting of the non-edges in all neighbourhoods shows that \[D_2 = \sum_{v \in V(G')} e(\overline{G'}[N_{G'}(v)]) = n \cdot \left(n^2/16 + o(n^2)\right) = \left(\frac{3}{8} + o(1)\right) \binom{n}{3} \.\] Hence, for any Goodman sequence \(\mathcal{G'}\), the value \(p_2(\mathcal{G'})\), if it exists, is at most \(3/8\), where by the Erdős-Simonovits stability Theorem, equality is attained only when almost all neighbourhoods are close to being disjoint unions of two complete graphs of order \(n/4\) each. Since \(G\) is 3RL, it follows by Corollary [\[cor3rl\]](#cor3rl){reference-type="ref" reference="cor3rl"} that this must indeed be the case. Let \(U \subseteq V(G)\) be a set of order \((1-o(1)) n\) such that for every \(v \in U\) we have \(d_G(v) = n/2 + o(n)\) and the neighbourhood \(N(v)\) admits a bipartition into parts \(N_1(v)\) and \(N_2(v)\) such that \(|N_1(v)|, |N_2(v)| = n/4 + o(n)\), there are \((1-o(1)) n^2/32\) edges within each partition class and \(o(n^2)\) edges between the two classes. Let \(v \in U\) be an arbitrary vertex. It follows by the above that there exists a vertex \(u \in A(u) := U \cap N_1(v)\) such that \(|A(u)| = n/4 + o(n)\), \(d_G(u, A(u)) = n/4 + o(n)\) and \(d_G(u, N_2(v)) = o(n)\). Let \(B = N_G(u) \setminus N_G(v)\); note that \(|B| = n/4 + o(n)\). Since \(u \in U\), its neighbourhood \(N_G(u)\) must be close to a union of two complete graphs of order \(n/4\) each. Since \(G[A(u)]\) is essentially a complete graph on \(n/4 + o(n)\) vertices, it follows that \(G[B]\) is essentially a complete graph on \(n/4 + o(n)\) vertices as well. Moreover, there are \(o(n^2)\) edges of \(G\) between \(A(u)\) and \(N_2(v) \cup B\). Let \(X = U \setminus (A(u) \cup N_2(v) \cup B)\); note that \(|X| = n/4 + o(n)\). Since \(d_G(w) = n/2 + o(n)\) holds for every \(w \in A(u)\), it follows that \(\{x,y\} \in E(G)\) for all but \(o(n^2)\) pairs \((x,y) \in A(u) \times X\). Let \(z \in A(u) \setminus \{u\}\) be an arbitrary vertex. Up to \(o(n)\) vertices, its neighbourhood is \(A(u) \cup X\) and so is far from being the disjoint union of two cliques of order \(n/4\) each, contrary to the definition of \(U\). ## Case 5: \(H = P_4\) {#case-5-h-p_4 .unnumbered} For graphs with no induced \(P_4\), also known as *cographs*, we have the following structural characterisation due to Seinsche: if \(G\) is induced \(P_4\)-free then either \(G\) or \(\overline{G}\) is disconnected (the other one is thereby forced to be connected). Let \(W \subseteq V(G)\) be an arbitrary set of order at least 2. Clearly \(G[W]\) is induced \(P_4\)-free and so, by the above characterisation, either \(G[W]\) or \(\overline{G}[W]\) is disconnected (note that it might be \(G[W]\) for certain \(W \subseteq V(G)\) and \(\overline{G}[W]\) for others). Seinsche's characterisation allows us to construct a sequence \(\mathcal{P}_0, \mathcal{P}_1, \dots\) of partitions of \(V(G)\) as follows. \(\mathcal{P}_0 = \left\{V(G)\right\}\) and, for every \(i \geq 0\), \(\mathcal{P}_{i+1}\) is obtained through partitioning each \(W \in \mathcal{P}_i\) with \(\left|W\right|\geq 2\) into the connected components of either \(G[W]\) or \(\overline{G}[W]\), depending which of the two is disconnected. For every \(i \geq 0\), let \(V_i\) denote a largest set in \(\mathcal{P}_i\). For an arbitrarily small \(\varepsilon > 0\) and sufficiently large \(n\) let \(j \geq 0\) denote the smallest index for which \(|V_{j+1}| < (1-\varepsilon) n\); clearly such an index \(j\) must exist. Since \(G\) is Goodman, it follows by Proposition [\[propgood\]](#propgood){reference-type="ref" reference="propgood"} that at most \(\epsilon n\) vertices of \(G\) are \(\epsilon\)-exceptional. Since \(|V_{j+1}| < (1-\varepsilon) n\), the only way to ensure that there will not be too many exceptional vertices in \(G\) is to split \(V_j\) in \(\mathcal{P}_{j+1}\) into two sets \(W_1\) and \(W_2\) of size \(n/2-2 \epsilon n \leq |W_1|, |W_2| \leq n/2 + 2 \epsilon n\), and possibly some additional small sets. Indeed, otherwise every vertex of \(V(G) \setminus V_{j+1}\) would be exceptional. Assume first that \(G[V_j]\) is disconnected. Then there are at most \(3\epsilon n^2\) pairs \(\{x,y\} \subseteq W_1\) and at most \(3\epsilon n^2\) pairs \(\{x,y\} \subseteq W_2\) which are not adjacent in \(G\). It follows that \(D_0(G) \leq c \epsilon n^3\) for some absolute constant \(c\) and thus \(p_0(G) = 0\). Similarly, if \(\overline{G}[V_j]\) is disconnected then \(p_3(G) = 0\). This contradicts our assumption that \(G\) is 3RL. ## Case 6: \(H = C_4\) {#case-6-h-c_4 .unnumbered} Consider the expression \[\sum_{\left\{u,v\right\}\in E(\overline{G})}\binom{d_G(u,v)}{2} \.\] On the one hand, it counts \(D_{K_4^-}(G)+2D_{C_4}(G)\), and since, by assumption, \(D_{C_4}=0\), it must equal \(D_{K_4^-}\). Now, since by Corollary [\[cor3rl\]](#cor3rl){reference-type="ref" reference="cor3rl"} \[\sum_{\left\{u,v\right\}\in E(\overline{G})}d_G(u,v)=D_2(G)=\frac{3}{8}\binom{n}{3}+o(n^3)=\frac{n^3}{16}+o(n^3) \,,\] using the convexity of binomial coefficients we obtain \[\begin{aligned} \label{eq: 2} D_{K_4^-}&= \sum_{\left\{u,v\right\}\in E(\overline{G})}\binom{d_G(u,v)}{2} \geq e(\overline{G})\binom{\frac{1}{e(\overline{G})}\sum_{\left\{u,v\right\}\in E(\overline{G})}d_G(u,v)}{2}\\ &=\frac{n^2}{4}\binom{n/4}{2}+o(n^4)=\frac{n^4}{128}+o(n^4) \. \notag \end{aligned}\] Thus \[\label{eq: 2a} p_{K_4^-}(G)\geq 3/16 \.\] Now consider the expression \[\sum_{\left\{u,v\right\}\in E(G)}d_G(u,-v)\cdot d_G(v,-u) \.\] On the one hand, it counts \(D_{P_4}+4D_{C_4}\), which by assumption equals \(D_{P_4}\). On the other hand, since \(G\) is Goodman, by Proposition [\[propgood\]](#propgood){reference-type="ref" reference="propgood"} we have \(d(u)=d(v)+o(n)\) for all but at most \(o(n^2)\) pairs of vertices, hence, \(d(u,-v)=d(v,-u)+o(n)\) for almost all pairs. As a result, we obtain \[\sum_{\left\{u,v\right\}\in E(G)} d(u,-v)\cdot d(v,-u) = \frac{1}{4} \sum_{\left\{u,v\right\} \in E(G)} \left(d(u,-v) + d(v,-u)\right)^2 + o(n^4) \.\] Now, since \[\sum_{\left\{u,v\right\}\in E(G)}\left(d(u,-v)+d(v,-u)\right)=2D_2(G)=\frac{3}{4}\binom{n}{3}+o(n^3)=\frac{n^3}{8}+o(n^3) \,,\] the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality yields \[\begin{aligned} \label{eq: 3} D_{P_4} &= \frac{1}{4}\sum_{\left\{u,v\right\}\in E(G)}\left(d(u,-v)+d(v,-u)\right)^2+o(n^4) \\ &\geq \frac{1}{4} \cdot e(G)\left[\frac{1}{e(G)}\sum_{\left\{u,v\right\}\in E(G)}\left(d(u,-v)+d(v,-u)\right)\right]^2 +o(n^4) \notag \\ &= \frac{1}{4} \cdot \frac{n^2}{4} \cdot \left(\frac{n}{2}\right)^2+o(n^4) \notag \\ &= \frac{n^4}{64}+o(n^4) \. \notag \end{aligned}\] Thus \[\label{eq: 3a} p_{P_4}(G) \geq 3/8 \.\] Finally, double counting pairs of edges in \(G\) not sharing a vertex, we obtain \[\frac{e(G)^2}{2}+o(n^4)=\binom{n^2/4}{2}+o(n^4)=D_{2K_2}+D_{P_4}+D_{T^+}+2D_{C_4}+2D_{K_4^-}+3D_{K_4} \,,\] where \(2K_2\) is the complement of \(C_4\). Thus \[p_{2K_2}+p_{P_4}+p_{T^+}+2p_{K_4^-}+3p_{K_4} = \frac{3}{4} \.\] Since from [\[eq: 2a\]](#eq: 2a){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq: 2a"} and [\[eq: 3a\]](#eq: 3a){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq: 3a"} we know that \(2p_{K_4^-}(G)+p_{P_4}(G)\geq 3/4\), we deduce that \(p_{T^+}(G)=p_{K_4}(G)=0\), \(p_{K_4^-}(G)=3/16\), and \(p_{P_4}(G) = 3/8\). The last two identities can only hold if in [\[eq: 2\]](#eq: 2){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq: 2"} and [\[eq: 3\]](#eq: 3){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq: 3"} we have equality up to \(o(n^4)\). The former would imply that \(d(u,v)\) must be close to its average \(n/4 + o(n)\) for all but \(o(n^2)\) pairs \(\left\{u,v\right\}\in E(\overline{G})\). Similarly, an equality up to \(o(n^4)\) in [\[eq: 3\]](#eq: 3){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq: 3"} implies that \(d(u,-v)=d(v,-u)+o(n)=n/4+o(n)\) for almost every pair \(\left\{u,v\right\}\in E(G)\), which, given Proposition [\[propgood\]](#propgood){reference-type="ref" reference="propgood"}, also means that \(d(u,v)=n/4+o(n)\) for every such pair. In total, we obtain that all but \(o(n^2)\) pairs of vertices \(\left\{u,v\right\}\) have \(n/4+o(n)\) joint neighbours, and therefore \[\label{eq::quasirandom} \sum_{u,v \in V} \left|d(u,v)-\frac{n}{4}\right| = o(n^3) \.\] However, equation [\[eq::quasirandom\]](#eq::quasirandom){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq::quasirandom"} is one of several equivalent definitions of a quasirandom graph (see e.g. Theorem 9.3.1 in ) and thus all induced densities in \(G\) are random-like. In particular, contrary to our assumption, \(G\) cannot be induced \(C_4\)-free. With contradiction obtained for each \(4\)-vertex graph \(H\), the proof of Theorem [\[thm4univ\]](#thm4univ){reference-type="ref" reference="thm4univ"} is concluded. # Large induced subgraphs {#seclarge} Our aim in this section is to prove Theorem [\[thmoverkill\]](#thmoverkill){reference-type="ref" reference="thmoverkill"}. The main ingredient of our proof will be a construction of a \(3RL\) sequence with no cliques of order at least 10. Given any graph \(G\) of order \(n\), we construct an \((n-1)\)-regular graph \(H = f(G)\) of order \(2n\) as follows. Let \(G_1 = (V_1, E_1)\) and \(G_2 = (V_2, E_2)\) be two disjoint copies of \(G = (V,E)\), where \(V = \{u_1, \ldots, u_n\}\), \(V_1 = \{v_1, \ldots, v_n\}\) and \(V_2 = \{v'_1, \ldots, v'_n\}\). Set \(V(H) = V_1 \cup V_2\) and \(E(H) = E_1 \cup E_2 \cup F\), where \(F = \left\{\{v_i, v'_j\} \colon 1 \leq i \neq j \leq n \textrm{ and } \left\{u_i, u_j \right\} \notin E \right\}\). That is, we take two identical copies of \(G\) and connect two distinct vertices, one from each copy, by an edge of \(H\) if and only if they are *not* adjacent in \(G\). The above construction is very similar to the *tensor product* of \(G\) and \(K_2\); the sole difference is that we exclude the "vertical" edges, that is, edges between \(v_i\) and \(v'_i\). Tensor products of graphs were first defined by Thomason in . See Section [6](#secdisc){reference-type="ref" reference="secdisc"} for more details. Note that for any sequence \(\mathcal{G} = (G_k)_{k=1}^\infty\), the corresponding sequence \(f(\mathcal{G}) = (f(G_k))_{k=1}^\infty\) is automatically Goodman. The next question to ask is, under what conditions is \(f(\mathcal{G})\) 3RL. Given Lemma [\[lem::fis3RL\]](#lem::fis3RL){reference-type="ref" reference="lem::fis3RL"}, our aim is to construct a sequence \(\mathcal{G}\) with \(p_1(\mathcal{G}) + p_3(\mathcal{G}) = 1/2\) such that \(f(\mathcal{G})\) does not contain a clique of some fixed size. Given a positive integer \(k\) and a real number \(r \geq 2\) that might depend on \(k\), let \(G_k^r = (V_k, E_k)\), where \(V_k = \{0, 1, \ldots, k-1\}\) and \(E_k = \{\{i,j\} \colon i-j \mod k > k/r \textrm{ and } j-i \mod k > k/r\}\); let \(\mathcal{G} = (G_k^r)_{k=1}^\infty\). Since any \(\lceil r \rceil\) vertices of \(V_k\) must contain two whose distance in the cyclic group \(C_k\) is at most \(k/r\), the largest clique of \(G_k^r\) is of order at most \(\left \lceil r \right \rceil-1\). We claim that a similar statement holds in \(H\). It remains to find a value of \(r\) for which \((p_1 + p_3)f(\mathcal{G}) = 1/2\), where \(\mathcal{G} = (G_k^r)_{k=1}^\infty\). Observe that for \(r > k\) the graph \(G_k^r\) is a complete graph, whereas for \(r = 2\) the graph \(G_k^r\) is empty. Hence there must exist a real number \(r\) for which \((p_1 + p_3)(G_k^r) = 1/2+o(1)\). A straightforward calculation shows that \(p_3(G_k^r) = \left(\frac{r-3}{r}\right)^2 + o(1)\) and \(p_1(G_k^r)= \frac{3}{r^2} + o(1)\), whence the desired value of \(r\) is achieved at \(2\sqrt{3} + 6 \approx 9.46\). For this value of \(r\) the sequence \(\mathcal{H} = f(\mathcal G)\) is 3RL but does not contain a clique of order \(10\). Theorem [\[thmoverkill\]](#thmoverkill){reference-type="ref" reference="thmoverkill"} is a simple corollary of the aforementioned result for cliques of order 10. Before showing this, let us remark that, for every \(r \geq 10\), there exists a 3RL graph with no induced copy of \(K_{1,r}\). This is simply because \(K_r\) is an induced subgraph of \(\overline{K_{1,r}}\), so \(\overline{\mathcal{H}}\), the sequence of complements of the graphs \(f(G_k^r)\) we have just constructed, does not contain any star of order \(11\) or greater as an induced subgraph. Now let \(J\) be any graph of order \(n \geq R(10,10)\). By Ramsey's Theorem \(J\) must contain \(K_{10}\) or \(\overline{K_{10}}\) as a subgraph. In the former case \(\mathcal{H}\) is 3RL but without \(J\) as an induced subgraph and in the latter case \(\overline{\mathcal{H}}\) is 3RL but without \(J\) as an induced subgraph. This concludes the proof of Theorem [\[thmoverkill\]](#thmoverkill){reference-type="ref" reference="thmoverkill"}. # A construction of high universality {#sechigh} In this section we prove Theorem [\[thmarbitrary\]](#thmarbitrary){reference-type="ref" reference="thmarbitrary"}, to which end we shall use the following construction. Given vertex disjoint graphs \(G_1 = (V_1, E_1)\) and \(G_2 = (V_2, E_2)\), where \(\left|V_1\right|=\left|V_2\right|\), we construct a graph \(H = G_1 \oplus G_2\) by joining \(G_1\) and \(G_2\) via a random bipartite graph. Formally, \(V(H) = V_1 \cup V_2\) and \(E(H) = E_1 \cup E_2 \cup E_3\), where \(E_3\) is formed by joining independently at random each pair \((x,y) \in V_1 \times V_2\) with probability \(1/2\). The special case of this construction in which \(G_1 = K_{n,n}\) and \(G_2 = \overline{K_{n,n}}\) was used by Chung, Graham and Wilson in order to demonstrate that a graph \(H\) that behaves random-like with respect to all \(3\)-vertex subgraphs, that is, when \((p_0(H), p_1(H), p_2(H), p_3(H)) = (1/8, 3/8, 3/8, 1/8)\), need not be quasirandom. Note that, due to Corollary [\[cor3rl\]](#cor3rl){reference-type="ref" reference="cor3rl"}, being random-like with respect to all \(3\)-vertex subgraphs is equivalent to being 3RL. The following two lemmas provide more information on the \(3\)-local profile of \(G_1 \oplus G_2\). Since two 3RL graphs satisfy the conditions of Lemma [\[lemplus\]](#lemplus){reference-type="ref" reference="lemplus"}, we obtain the following useful fact as an immediate corollary. Lemma [\[lemplus\]](#lemplus){reference-type="ref" reference="lemplus"} and Corollary [\[corplus\]](#corplus){reference-type="ref" reference="corplus"} allow us to iterate the construction \(G_1\oplus G_2\), taking the aforementioned example of Chung, Graham and Wilson as our starting point. Define \(G_1 := K_{n,n} \oplus \overline{K_{n,n}}\) and having constructed \(G_\ell\), define \(G_{\ell+1} := G_\ell \oplus G_\ell\). Let \(\mathcal{G}_\ell = (G_\ell)_{n=1}^{\infty}\), that is, we fix the \(\ell\)'s iteration and let \(n\) go to infinity. By Lemma [\[lemplus\]](#lemplus){reference-type="ref" reference="lemplus"} the sequence \(\mathcal{G}_1\) is a.a.s. 3RL and by Corollary [\[corplus\]](#corplus){reference-type="ref" reference="corplus"} it follows inductively that for each \(\ell>1\) the sequence \(\mathcal{G}_\ell\) is a.a.s. 3RL. Each graph \(G_\ell \in \mathcal{G}_\ell\) consists of \(2^\ell\) "deterministic" components, each of which is either a copy of \(K_{n,n}\) or its complement. The edges connecting vertices from different components are picked independently at random with probability \(1/2\) each. Now, if we select \(2^\ell\) vertices from \(G_\ell\) uniformly at random, the probability of choosing precisely one vertex from each deterministic component is a positive function of \(\ell\). Since the obtained graph contains only randomly picked edges, the expected proportion of induced copies of *any* graph \(H\) of order \(2^\ell\) is also a positive function of \(\ell\). Hence, for a fixed \(\ell\) and \(n\) tending to infinity we will have \(p_H(\mathcal{G}_\ell)>0\) for each such graph \(G\). On the other hand, any subgraph of \(G_\ell\) of order \(m = 24 \ell \cdot 2^\ell\), contains by the pigeonhole principle either a clique or an independent set of size \(12 \ell\). So assuming that \(H_\ell\) is \(m\)-universal, every graph of order \(m\) must contain such a set. However, the well-known lower bound on Ramsey numbers (see e.g. ) states that there exist graphs on \(2^{12 \ell/2} > m\) vertices without a clique or an independent set of size \(12 \ell\), a contradiction. Thus we conclude that \(\mathcal{G}_\ell\) is not \(m\)-universal, thereby completing the proof of Theorem [\[thmarbitrary\]](#thmarbitrary){reference-type="ref" reference="thmarbitrary"}. ## Remark. {#remark. .unnumbered} The standard proof of the bound \(R(k,k) > 2^{k/2}\) has stronger consequences. Namely, it shows that for \(n=2^{k/2}\) with high probability a random graph on \(n\) vertices does not contain an induced copy of \(K_k\) or \(\overline{K_k}\). Applying this fact to the proof of Theorem [\[thmarbitrary\]](#thmarbitrary){reference-type="ref" reference="thmarbitrary"} shows that the proportion of graphs of order \(m\) contained in \(\mathcal{H}_\ell\) vanishes as \(\ell\) tends to infinity. In other words, not only is \(\mathcal{H}_\ell\) not \(m\)-universal, it actually contains "very few" different induced subgraphs of order \(m\). # Discussion {#secdisc} There are many intriguing open problems regarding random-like sequences and universality. Several of them, including some problems on universality of tournaments, can be found in. It would be very interesting to generalise our results to \(m\)-random-like sequences, that is, to study universalities of sequences whose densities of \(m\)-cliques and \(m\)-anticliques is \(2^{-\binom{m}{2}}\). However, this seems to be a much more difficult task, since for \(m > 3\) we no longer have the analogue of Goodman's Theorem. In fact, in our proof of Theorem [\[thm4univ\]](#thm4univ){reference-type="ref" reference="thm4univ"} we made use of the "lucky coincidence" that the random-like number of triangles and anti-triangles is also the minimal possible. Disproving a conjecture of Erdős, it was shown by Thomason that this is no longer true for \(m \geq 4\). It would therefore also be interesting to investigate universalities of graphs whose densities of cliques and anti-cliques are the *smallest possible* rather than random-like. Since 3RL is not enough to ensure 5-universality, one might ask which stronger random-like properties suffice. We propose the following question. By Theorem [\[thm4univ\]](#thm4univ){reference-type="ref" reference="thm4univ"} the answer to Question [\[conjHT\]](#conjHT){reference-type="ref" reference="conjHT"} is affirmative for \(M\leq 4\), so \(M=5\) is the first open case. Note that the iterated blow-up construction used to prove that 3RL sequences are not necessarily \(5\)-universal is not 4RL and thus does not provide a negative answer to Question [\[conjHT\]](#conjHT){reference-type="ref" reference="conjHT"}. Our proof of Theorem [\[thm4univ\]](#thm4univ){reference-type="ref" reference="thm4univ"} established the existence of every possible \(4\)-vertex induced subgraph \(H\) in a 3RL sequence \(\mathcal{G}\). As noted in the Introduction, it follows from the induced graph removal lemma that in fact the corresponding density \(p_H(\mathcal{G})\) must be bounded away from \(0\). It would be interesting to determine, for every 4-vertex graph \(H\), the minimum density \(p_H(\mathcal{G})\) over all 3RL sequences \(\mathcal{G}\).

{'timestamp': '2014-01-23T02:10:52', 'yymm': '1401', 'arxiv_id': '1401.5735', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5735'}

# Introduction {#intro} The nuclear equation of state (EoS) is most commonly discussed in reference to its density dependence. The EoS is often expanded in terms of the asymmetry dependence as, \[\label{eos} E(\rho,\delta) = E(\rho) + E_{sym}(\rho) \delta^{2}\] where the binding energy per nucleon of the infinite nuclear matter is shown as a function of density (\(\rho\)) and isospin concentration (\(\delta\)) . The isospin concentration or asymmetry is the difference in the proton and neutron densities, \(\delta = (\rho_{n}-\rho_{p}) / (\rho_{n} +\rho_{p})\). The first term of Eq. [\[eos\]](#eos){reference-type="ref" reference="eos"} is not dependent on \(\delta\) and represents the binding energy per nucleon of symmetric nuclear matter. The coefficient of the second term, which has a \(\delta^{2}\) dependence, is referred to as the symmetry energy. The symmetry energy is the difference in energy between pure neutron matter (\(\delta = 1\)) and symmetric nuclear matter (\(\delta = 0\)). A intensely studied topic of interest in the nuclear science community is the density dependence of the symmetry energy . The form of the density dependence of the symmetry energy is a property of asymmetric nuclear matter. As discussed in a number of contributions to this special EPJA issue, the symmetry energy is a critical component for understanding neutron stars and the properties of finite nuclei . While the asymmetry sensitivity of the nuclear EoS is primarily discussed with reference to Eq. [\[eos\]](#eos){reference-type="ref" reference="eos"}, a complete description of the EoS will define the relationship between all the state variables such as temperature, density, internal energy, and pressure. For example, a significant amount of research has been devoted to examining the relationship between the thermal excitation energy (\(E^{*}\)) and temperature (\(T\)) of nuclei referred to as caloric curves . Understanding the \(E^{*}-T\) relationship was crucial in the development of the concept of a nuclear liquid-gas phase transition . Since the symmetry energy is a component of the EoS, it too will have a dependence on other state variables such as the temperature. Most of the observables of finite nuclei that can be used to constrain the EoS provide a relatively limited range for accessing different regions of density, temperature, and pressure. For example, giant monopole/dipole resonances , pygmy resonances , neutron skin thicknesses , ground state binding energies , and isobaric analog states  can all provide information on the nuclear EoS around the ground state of nuclear matter. Heavy-ion collisions (HICs) provide experimentalists with an extremely versatile probe that can be used to produce nuclear matter at densities, temperatures, and pressures far away from that of stable nuclei. By varying the energy and impact parameter of the collisions different regions of the nuclear EoS can be explored. This aspect of HICs has been exploited for constraining the density dependence of the symmetry energy  . Extracting information on the symmetry energy from heavy-ion collisions can be accomplished through both direct and indirect methods. In the direct approach, the measured fragment properties are used to extract information about the fragmenting system such as the density, temperature, or excitation energy. Furthermore, information about the symmetry energy can be obtained directly from the fragment yields using methods such as isoscaling . Combining this information can provide a rich picture of the nuclear system and how its properties are related. However, the assumptions associated with the scaling approaches can lead to significant uncertainties. One of the ultimate achievements of the direct approach would be to measure the symmetry energy and density of a nuclear system simultaneously in an experiment allowing for \(E_{sym}(\rho)\) to be extracted. This was first accomplished by Natowitiz *et al.* for nuclear matter at very low densities (\(\rho < 0.009\) fm\(^{-3}\)) . The other approach for extracting information about the nuclear EoS with heavy-ion collisions is through comparison of experimental results with theoretical predictions. Transport models can simulate the dynamical evolution of the heavy-ion collisions which can be compared to the experimental data . A key ingredient in the transport calculations is the effective nucleon-nucleon interaction or mean-field which defines the interaction between the nucleons. Therefore, the interaction can be varied within the transport model in an effort to determine which form best reproduces a given set of experimental data. Then information on the nuclear EoS can be inferred from the form of that nucleon-nucleon interaction. For example, there is a large number of Skyrme interactions that can reproduce the binding energies of nuclei while the resulting density dependence of the symmetry energy can vary widely . Using HICs the density dependence of the symmetry energy can be constrained from the interaction that best reproduces the experimental data. The difficulty of this approach is contained in the details of the theoretical transport calculations which have many variables that can effect the HIC predictions . In the following review article, the recent results obtained through both the direct and indirect approaches will be discussed in relation to the density and temperature dependence of the symmetry energy. The strengths and weaknesses of each approach are presented. The results demonstrate that both approaches have, and will continue, to provide enlightening insights into the nuclear EoS. # Direct Measurements A direct measurement of the density, temperature, excitation energy, and symmetry energy of a nuclear system would provide a straightforward method of constraining the nuclear EoS. In many regards, experimentalist have developed tools to allow for this type of information to be extracted directly from heavy-ion collsision measurements. While a extensive amount of research has been devoted to the development and study of the different methods for measuring the temperature, excitation energy, and density of fragmenting nuclear systems , these topics are not reviewed in this work as the focus remains on the symmetry energy. ## Isoscaling The isotopic composition of the fragments resulting from a heavy-ion collision can provide a direct link to the symmetry energy . One approach to isolating the effect of the symmetry energy on the isotopic yields is the isoscaling relationship . Isoscaling represents the exponential relationship exhibited in the isotopic yields of fragments between two systems with different neutron to proton ratios, \[\label{iso} R_{21}(N,Z) = Y_{2}(N,Z) / Y_{1}(N,Z) = C \texttt{exp}(\alpha N + \beta Z)\] where the yield of a isotope with \(N\) neutrons and \(Z\) protons from system 1 (2) is shown as \(Y_{1}(N,Z)\) (\(Y_{2}(N,Z)\)) . The scaling parameters are \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\); \(C\) is for normalization. The convention is that system 2 has neutron-to-proton ratio (\(N/Z\)) larger than system 1. An example of the isoscaling phenomena is shown in Fig. [\[f:Iso\]](#f:Iso){reference-type="ref" reference="f:Iso"} from the experimental fragment yields of \(^{112}\)Sn + \(^{112}\)Sn and \(^{124}\)Sn + \(^{124}\)Sn heavy-ion collisions. It has been shown that the symmetry energy can be linked to the isotopic yields through the relationship, \[\label{csym} \alpha = \frac{4 C_{sym}}{T} \left[ \left( \frac{Z_{1}}{A_{1}} \right)^{2}-\left( \frac{Z_{2}}{A_{2}} \right)^{2} \right] = \frac{4 C_{sym}}{T} \Delta\] where \(C_{sym}\) is the symmetry energy coefficient, \(T\) is the temperature of the source, and the \((Z/A)^{2}\) terms are the source asymmetry from system 1 and 2 . The difference in the source asymmetry is often referred to as \(\Delta\). This relationship provides a powerful connection between the directly measured fragment yields and the symmetry energy. From Eq. [\[csym\]](#csym){reference-type="ref" reference="csym"} it is immediately clear that this relationship requires the two systems to have, ideally, the same temperature. Theoretical examination has suggested that the fragment formation in heavy-ion collisions occurs at low-density and finite temperatures indicating that the isoscaling should be an appropriate tool to probe the symmetry energy . It is also worth noting that the \(C_{sym}\) of Eq. [\[csym\]](#csym){reference-type="ref" reference="csym"} actually represents the symmetry free energy (\(F_{sym}\)) and is related to the internal symmetry energy through \(E_{sym} = F_{sym} + TS_{sym}\), where \(S_{sym}\) is the symmetry entropy . In most cases, the extracted \(C_{sym}\) is referred to as the symmetry energy, which is likely a reasonable assumption around the saturation density . However, at sufficiently low densities the \(TS_{sym}\) term is significant and, as shown by Natowitz *et al.*, must be addressed . Throughout Section 2 the symbol \(C_{sym}\) is used, in comparison to \(E_{sym}\), to represent values extracted from the isocaling method. ## \(T\) and \(\rho\) dependence of \(C_{sym}\) An example of how the isoscaling method can be used to glean information about the symmetry energy is shown in Fig. [\[f:indra\]](#f:indra){reference-type="ref" reference="f:indra"}. Le Fèvre *et al.* used the isoscaling relationship to extract the \(\alpha\) coefficient from the fragmentation of \(^{124,112}\)Sn + \(^{12}\)C as a function of the impact parameter at 300 and 600 MeV/A . Furthermore, the temperature of the fragmenting system was directly calculated from the experimental data using the Albergo method , as shown in the middle panel. The \(T\) between the \(^{112}\)Sn and \(^{124}\)Sn was assumed equivalent within the uncertainties and thus, Eq. [\[csym\]](#csym){reference-type="ref" reference="csym"} was used to extract \(C_{sym}\) (referred to as \(\gamma_{app}\) in the bottom panel). From the results of Fig. [\[f:indra\]](#f:indra){reference-type="ref" reference="f:indra"} it would be tempting to extract information about the relationship between \(T\) and \(C_{sym}\). The results show an inverse relationship between \(T\) and \(C_{sym}\). As \(T\) rises from 6 MeV to 8 MeV a drastic drop in \(C_{sym}\) occurs from about 25 MeV to 15 Mev. However, it is important to recognize that in the heavy-ion collisions it is very difficult to vary a single property, such as \(T\), while keeping the other properties of the system constant. The relatively small change in \(T\) is accompanied by a large change in the centrality of the collisions, ranging from central (\(1-b/b_{max} = 0\)) to peripheral-like (\(1-b/b_{max} = 0.2\)) collisions. The results of Shetty *et al.*, shown in Fig. [\[f:shetty\]](#f:shetty){reference-type="ref" reference="f:shetty"}, provide additional insight into the issue . Shetty *et al.* measured the isotopic yields of fragments from Ni and Fe systems at energies of 30 to 47 MeV/A . The isoscaling parameter, temperature, and symmetry energy coefficient were all determined as a function of the excitation energy. Similar to the results of Le Fèvre *et al.*, there is a slight increase in the temperature of the source which is correlated with a significant decrease in the symmetry energy. Shetty *et al.* also estimated the density of the system at break-up using the expanding Fermi-gas model and the result is shown in the bottom panel of Fig. [\[f:shetty\]](#f:shetty){reference-type="ref" reference="f:shetty"} . Over the examined excitation energy region, roughly 5 - 10 MeV/A, there is a significant drop in the density. Thus, the decrease in the symmetry energy observed by Shetty and Le Fèvre is likely a response to the decreasing breakup density of the system rather than the slight increase in temperature. The corresponding density dependence of the symmetry extracted from the results of Shetty *et al.* agree well with current constraints. The relatively weak \(T\) dependence of the symmetry energy extracted from the experimental data in Fig. [\[f:shetty\]](#f:shetty){reference-type="ref" reference="f:shetty"} is in agreement with most theoretical predictions . However, a more detailed account of the theoretical approaches and results addressing the temperature dependence of the symmetry energy is presented in this special EPJA issue by Agrawal *et al.*. In general, the density dependence of the symmetry energy is expected to be stronger than the \(T\) dependence, however this is dependent on the interaction and method used for the calculation. An example is shown in Fig. [\[f:simT\]](#f:simT){reference-type="ref" reference="f:simT"}, where the density and temperature dependencies of the symmetry energy were calculated using the Seyler-Blanchard interaction within the Thomas-Fermi formulation . The results also show a weak dependence of the symmetry energy on \(T\). A difficult but important experimental measurement would be to try and isolate the \(T\) dependence of the symmetry energy. The \(T\) dependence of the symmetry energy is particulary important for understanding the dynamics of the collapose and explosion of massive stars . In these stages the nuclear matter of the massive star is warm (\(T > 0\) MeV). Therefore, it is critical to understand the evolution of the symmetry energy with temperature. Accomplishing a direct measurement of the \(T\) dependence of the symmetry energy would require identifying a reaction mechanism(s) which would produce sources with relatively constant densities but varying temperatures. The results of Xu *et al.* suggested that the largest \(T\) dependence of the symmetry energy occurs when the breakup density of the system is very low . Thus probing very low-density nuclear matter may provide the best oppurtunity to isolate the \(T\) dependence from the density dependence. Natowitz and collaborators have shown how the temperature, density, and symmetry energy can all be reliably extracted at low densities . While the results show a strong correlation between the density and temperature, these types of measurements may provide the best avenue forward in attempting to learn about the \(T\) dependence of the symmetry energy. Even if it is not possible to completely isolate the temperature dependence, simultaneous measurements of the temperature, density, and symmetry energy could significantly constrain the theoretical models. ## Definition of \(\Delta\) From the relationship between isoscaling and the symmetry energy (Eq. [\[csym\]](#csym){reference-type="ref" reference="csym"}) it is clear that improvements in the experimental determination of \(\alpha\), \(\Delta\), and \(T\) will aid in the extraction and investigation of \(C_{sym}\). Wuenschel *et al.* showed that the quality of the fragment isoscaling could be significantly improved through accurately defining the \(\Delta\) of the emitting sources . In Fig. [\[f:wue\]](#f:wue){reference-type="ref" reference="f:wue"} the isotopic yield ratios are shown from the 35 MeV/A \(^{86}\)Kr + \(^{64}\)Ni and \(^{78}\)Kr + \(^{58}\)Ni reactions using three different source definitions. In the top panel, the source, and therefore \(\Delta\), were defined simply by the \(Z/A\) of the two reaction systems. This procedure was originally adapted in early isoscaling studies. The results of Wuenschel *et al.* show that the fragment yields exhibit only a modest scaling. Rather than assuming that the \(N/Z\) of the source is constant for a given beam-target combination, realistically each collision will produce an emitting source with a different \(N/Z\). Therefore, primary quasi-projectile sources were reconstructed from the experimental data on an event-by-event basis. Then two sets of events, each with a relatively narrow source (or quasi-projectile) \(Z/A\), could be selected and the isotopic ratios examined. The results of this procedure are shown in the middle panel of Fig. [\[f:wue\]](#f:wue){reference-type="ref" reference="f:wue"} and demonstrate a marked improvement in the isoscaling. The source \(Z/A\) was further refined by including the measurement of free neutrons emitted in the reaction. By selecting sources based on the free neutron corrected \(Z/A\) of the quasi-projectile source, the isotopic yield ratios were shown to exhibit excellent isoscaling features (bottom panel). Thus, the extracted \(\alpha\) and the source \(Z/A\), calculated event-by-event, are of much higher quality and should result in a more accurate determination of \(C_{sym}\). A similar effect was shown in the work of Galanopoulos *et al.* for mass \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}40 quasi-projectiles . While the results of Wuenschel *et al.* showed the importance of accurately determining the \(N/Z\) of the emitting source, different definitions of \(\Delta\) have been proposed and can significantly alter the extracted \(C_{sym}\) values . In Fig. [\[f:iso_compare\]](#f:iso_compare){reference-type="ref" reference="f:iso_compare"} \(C_{sym}/T\) was extracted as a function of the fragment mass from the isoscaling of the fragments emitted from the reconstructed quasi-projectiles of Zn + Zn and Ni + Ni reactions . The open crosses were calculated using the "standard" definition of \(\Delta\) defined in Eq. [\[csym\]](#csym){reference-type="ref" reference="csym"} , which is also the definition used in Figs. [\[f:indra\]](#f:indra){reference-type="ref" reference="f:indra"}, [\[f:shetty\]](#f:shetty){reference-type="ref" reference="f:shetty"}, and [\[f:wue\]](#f:wue){reference-type="ref" reference="f:wue"}. The closed red circles (\(\Delta_{<m_{f}>}\)) and open squares (\(\Delta_{liquid}\)) show the results of the same isoscaling analysis with different definitions of \(\Delta\) (see Ref.  for extended discussion). In general the different definitions of \(\Delta\) stem from different theoretical frameworks. The "standard" definition of Eq. [\[csym\]](#csym){reference-type="ref" reference="csym"} (\(\Delta_{source}\)) comes from the statistical multifragmentation and expanding emitting sources models . The \(\Delta_{liquid}\) definition derived from a study based on the dynamical Antisymmetrized Molecular Dyanmics model  and the \(\Delta_{<m_{f}>}\) definition was derived on the basis of a Landau free energy approach . As shown, significant variations exist between all three definitions. The \(\Delta_{source}\) and \(\Delta{<m_{f}>}\) definitions provide information on the average isospin of the sources whereas the \(\Delta_{liquid}\) is a function of the \(Z\) of the fragment and, thus, varies based on the average isospin of a given element produced in the reaction. Further distinction of these differences is provided in the following sections as it also applies to the different scaling method approaches. ## Scaling Methods Different scaling methods have been proposed to connect isotopic fragment yields with the symmetry energy coefficient. The results from the m-scaling approach  and isobaric yield ratio method  are shown in Fig. [\[f:iso_compare\]](#f:iso_compare){reference-type="ref" reference="f:iso_compare"} along with the different definitions of \(\Delta\) used in the isoscaling method. Overall, the comparative study shows that the magnitude and \(A\)-dependence of the extracted \(C_{sym}\) can vary significantly depending on the underlying scaling theory and the definition of \(\Delta\). A couple of observations can be extracted from Fig. [\[f:iso_compare\]](#f:iso_compare){reference-type="ref" reference="f:iso_compare"}: - The isoscaling and m-scaling approaches provide similar results when the definition of \(\Delta\) is the same (open and closed red circles). - When the source is defined by it's average isospin (\(\Delta_{source}\) or \(\Delta_{<m_{f}>}\)) the extracted \(C_{sym}/T\) is relatively constant as a function of mass. - \(C_{sym}/T\) varies as a function of mass when using the isobaric yield ratio method or using the \(\Delta_{liquid}\) definition. - The "standard" isocaling approach with \(\Delta_{source}\) produces significantly lower values of \(C_{sym}/T\) in comparison to the other methods. The results of Fig. [\[f:iso_compare\]](#f:iso_compare){reference-type="ref" reference="f:iso_compare"} present a complicated picture of the ability of scaling methods to provide insight in the symmetry energy. Defining the correct approach is clearly a high priority and may require careful examination of the assumptions of each approach. With a simple argument we can attempt to discern which approach provides the most realistic results. Using the Fermi gas model relationship of \(E^{*} = aT^{2}\), with the level density parameter \(a = A/8\), an \(E^{*} = 3.5\) MeV/A should correspond to \(T\approx5\) MeV. Taking \(T = 5\) MeV, \(C_{sym}\) can then be calculated from the measured \(C_{sym}/T\) of Fig. [\[f:iso_compare\]](#f:iso_compare){reference-type="ref" reference="f:iso_compare"}. For the isoscaling method with \(\Delta_{source}\) (open crosses) this leads to \(C_{sym}\approx20\) MeV, while all the other approaches give \(C_{sym}/T\) \(\approx\) 10 corresponding to an erroneously large value of \(C_{sym}\) = 50 MeV. Further investigation is required to decisively determine the optimum approach for extracting information on \(C_{sym}\) from scaling studies. ## Secondary Decay Another issue that has been highly debated is the role secondary decay plays in the extraction of \(C_{sym}\). The theoretical connections between the isoscaling parameter and the symmetry energy (Eq. [\[csym\]](#csym){reference-type="ref" reference="csym"}) is defined for the isotopic yields of the primary fragments emitted from a hot equilibrated source at a given temperature. The hot primary fragments can then undergo further breakup referred to as secondary decay. For example, the hot source may emit a \(^{8}\)Be fragment that will secondary decay into \(2\alpha\), which would enhance the measured \(\alpha\) yield beyond the primary \(\alpha\) yield. The effect of the secondary decay should be most significant for light and intermediate mass fragments in comparison to heavier residues (further discussion in Section [2.6](#sec:heavy){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:heavy"}). Statistical multifragmentation models can simulate the decay of a hot source, including the secondary decay, where the fragment emission probability is a function of the binding energy. Therefore, the symmetry energy coefficient can be varied within the model to examine how the isotopic fragment yields would change. In general, previous works indicate that the secondary decay does modify the extracted isoscaling parameter . However, the extent of this effect is not well determined  and in some cases is predicted to be negligible . Further work to provide a clear relationship between secondary decay and isoscaling would be highly valued. Recently, Marini *et al.* tested the secondary decay effects by varying the input symmetry energy coefficient (\(C_{sym}^{in}\)) in the SMM model and then calculating the symmetry energy coefficient using the isoscaling and isobaric yield ratio methods (\(C_{sym}^{out}\)) . As shown in Fig. [\[f:smm\]](#f:smm){reference-type="ref" reference="f:smm"}, both methods provide a linear response of \(C_{sym}^{out}\) as a function of \(C_{sym}^{in}\) with the use of primary fragment yields. While \(C_{sym}^{in} \neq C_{sym}^{out}\), it is evident that the primary fragment yields can provide direct information about the symmetry energy. The effect of the secondary decay can be observed in Fig. [\[f:smmcold\]](#f:smmcold){reference-type="ref" reference="f:smmcold"}, which is from the same simulation shown in Fig. [\[f:smm\]](#f:smm){reference-type="ref" reference="f:smm"} except the secondary fragment yields were used with the isoscaling and isobaric yield method to extract \(C_{sym}^{out}\) . The different panels show the results using different ranges of fragments for the scaling analysis. In general, the relatively strong correlation observed using the primary fragments with the isoscaling approach is lost due to the secondary decay. In particular, at large values of \(C_{sym}^{in}\) the extracted \(C_{sym}^{out}\) can be hindered by 50\(\%\). Similar results have been observed in other calculations as shown in Refs. . If the statistical multifragmentation models are accurately simulating the primary and secondary decays, then these results indicate the difficulty in directly extracting information on the symmetry energy from the cold fragment yields. This is the reason why the bottom panel of Fig. [\[f:indra\]](#f:indra){reference-type="ref" reference="f:indra"} was labeled as \(\gamma\)-apparent rather than \(C_{sym}\). ## Heavy fragment isoscaling {#sec:heavy} A serious issue to be addressed is how to best extract information on the symmetry energy directly from the measured yield distributions such that the density and temperature dependence can be obtained. As discussed in the previous section, isoscaling of light or intermediate mass fragments can be accompanied by large secondary decay effects. An alternative option that has been explored is the isoscaling of heavy residue fragment yields . These yields may be less susceptible to the secondary decay effects in comparison to the light charged particles. An example from the work of Souliotis *et al.* of the heavy residue isoscaling is shown in Fig. [\[f:residue\]](#f:residue){reference-type="ref" reference="f:residue"} for reactions around 25 MeV/nucleon . At these energies, the reactions can be generally considered as deep-inelastic in which two heavy fragments are produced from the dissipative reaction along with light particle emission. From the residue yields Souliotis *et al.* where able to extract \(C_{sym}\) as a function of the fragment excitation energy. The results of the heavy residue and light fragment isoscaling are compared in Section [2.8](#s:survey){reference-type="ref" reference="s:survey"}. Relevant to the heavy residue isoscaling is the theoretical work of Lehaut *et al.* which, using the lattice gas model, suggested that the isoscaling of the largest fragment would provide a strong connection between the input and extracted symmetry energy coefficient . As shown in Fig. [\[f:heavyfrag\]](#f:heavyfrag){reference-type="ref" reference="f:heavyfrag"}, the open circles connected with a solid line represent the exact symmetry energy as a function of temperature for the simulation and the dashed black lines represent the symmetry energy extracted from isoscaling of the \(Z\) = 2 - 7 fragments using the common source definition defined in Eq. [\[csym\]](#csym){reference-type="ref" reference="csym"}. The results show that the typical isoscaling analysis is unable to reproduce the correct trend or magnitude of the \(T\)-dependence of the symmetry energy. Another option that was explored was using a different source definition such that, \[\label{csym2} \alpha(Z) = \frac{4 C_{sym}(Z)}{T} \left[ \left( \frac{Z_{1}}{\langle A \rangle_{1}} \right)^{2}-\left( \frac{Z_{2}}{\langle A \rangle_{2}} \right)^{2} \right]\] where \(\alpha\) and \(C_{sym}\) are extracted for each \(Z\) and \(\langle A \rangle\) is the mean mass of the fragments for a given \(Z\). This definition is equivalent to the \(\Delta_{liquid}\) definition used in Fig. [\[f:iso_compare\]](#f:iso_compare){reference-type="ref" reference="f:iso_compare"}. The dotted grey lines are the results using Eq. [\[csym2\]](#csym2){reference-type="ref" reference="csym2"} for the \(Z\) = 2 - 7 fragments and show a nearly flat \(T\)-dependence of the symmetry energy. The weak relationship between the light fragment isoscaling results and the input symmetry energy was attributed to the domination of combinatorial effects in the lattice gas model. Despite the issues with the light fragments one of the most interesting aspects of the work was that Lehaut *et al.* found that using the heaviest fragments from each event along with Eq. [\[csym2\]](#csym2){reference-type="ref" reference="csym2"} the magnitude and \(T\)-dependence of the symmetry energy could be recovered relatively well (thick grey line). The concept of heavy fragment isoscaling certainly warrants continued theoretical and experimental investigations as it could provide a clear link between experimental yields and the symmetry energy. ## Secondary decay corrections While isoscaling of the heaviest fragment has been suggested to have a relatively direct link to \(C_{sym}\), not all experimental setups and reaction mechanisms allow for the heaviest fragment to be identified and measured easily. An alternative option is to measure the light fragment yields and use a theoretical model to account for the secondary decay effects . The use of the corrected light fragment yields can then provide information about the isoscaling of the primary fragment yields. This, of course, is no longer a direct method since a theoretical model is required for the secondary decay correction. Ogul *et al.* used this concept to extract information on \(C_{sym}\) from a comparison of the experimental isoscaling parameter \(\alpha\) with the Statistical Multifragmentation Model (SMM) . In Fig. [\[f:ogul\]](#f:ogul){reference-type="ref" reference="f:ogul"} the experimentally extracted isoscaling parameters (solid stars) from relativistic fragmentation reactions are presented as a function of the ratio of the total measured bound charge to the projectile charge (\(Z_{bound}\)/\(Z_{0}\)), which is correlated to the impact parameter. The isoscaling parameter decreases strongly with decreasing \(Z_{bound}\)/\(Z_{0}\), which agrees well with the previously discussed results indicating a decrease in \(\alpha\) with increasing \(E^{*}\). Instead of calculating \(C_{sym}\) from the extracted \(\alpha\), Ogul *et al.* used the SMM model to simulate the decay of the excited sources with different input values of the symmetry energy (referred to as \(\gamma\) in Fig. [\[f:ogul\]](#f:ogul){reference-type="ref" reference="f:ogul"}). The \(\alpha\) parameter was extracted from the SMM model from the secondary decay products allowing for a direct comparison with the experimental data. For each \(Z_{bound}\)/\(Z_{0}\) value, the isoscaling parameter from SMM that best reproduced the experimental isoscaling parameter could be determined and, thus, the associated input \(\gamma\) from the SMM model. These values of \(\gamma\) should then provide a direct link to the symmetry energy, free of any secondary decay effects. For example, for the \(^{124}\)Sn/\(^{124}\)La system at \(Z_{bound}\)/\(Z_{0}\) = 0.7 the experimental \(\alpha\) is accurately reproduced by the SMM model using \(\gamma = C_{sym} = 14\) MeV. This provides an intermediate approach between the direct and indirect methods of probing the symmetry energy. ## Survey of isoscaling results {#s:survey} A survey of the experimental \(E^{*}\) and \(T\) dependence of the symmetry energy, extracted from isoscaling, was completed and is presented in Fig. [\[f:csym\]](#f:csym){reference-type="ref" reference="f:csym"}. Each measurement was performed differently in terms of the fragments used in the isoscaling, the method for extracting the temperature, and the calculation of the excitation energy of the source. The details of each of the measurements are provided in Table [\[t:csym\]](#t:csym){reference-type="ref" reference="t:csym"}. In the case of measurements in which only the temperature or excitation energy was reported the corresponding excitation energy or temperature, respectively, was estimated using the simple Fermi Gas model relationship of \(E^{*} = a T^{2}\), with \(a = A/8\). The values estimated using the Fermi Gas model are indicated in Table [\[t:csym\]](#t:csym){reference-type="ref" reference="t:csym"}. In the top panel of Fig. [\[f:csym\]](#f:csym){reference-type="ref" reference="f:csym"} the different results for the excitation energy dependence of the symmetry energy are presented and show two distinct groupings. The results of Souliotis *et al.* and Ogul *et al.* indicate that the symmetry energy decreases rapidly with increasing \(E^{*}\) over the range of 2-4 Mev. The other isoscaling results present a consistently softer decrease of \(C_{sym}\) with \(E^{*}\). In examining the details of the different isoscaling analyses in Table [\[t:csym\]](#t:csym){reference-type="ref" reference="t:csym"} an important distinction is found between the two groupings. The results of Ogul *et al.* were effectively corrected for secondary decay using a simulation and Souliotis *et al.* used the heaviest fragment from each event for the isoscaling. As mentioned above, the isoscaling of the heaviest fragment was proposed as a promising observable for directly accessing the symmetry energy and may not require substantial secondary decay corrections. Thus, the fact that the two analyses of Ogul *et al.* and Souliotis *et al.* agree is rather remarkable since both should be providing a more direct link to the symmetry energy since secondary decay effects should be minimized. In comparison, the other isoscaling examples included light fragments in the analysis without secondary decay corrections and show a increased value of the symmetry energy. These results qualitatively follow the expected trend from the multifragmentation models which indicate that the secondary decay increases the measured \(C_{sym}^{out}\) for small input values of \(C_{sym}^{in}\) . It is worth noting that the agreement between the other analyses (using light fragments without secondary decay corrections) is impressive since different approaches were used in defining the source, measuring the temperature, and determining the excitation energy. This consistency suggests that the isoscaling approach is relatively robust. where \(\kappa = (\rho-\rho_{0})/3 \rho_{0}\). In Fig. [\[f:Lesym\]](#f:Lesym){reference-type="ref" reference="f:Lesym"} the current constraints extracted from heavy-ion collisions are presented in a \(2D\) plot showing the slope (\(L\)) as a function of the magnitude of the symmetry energy at saturation density \[\(E_{sym}(\rho_{0})\)\]. The two-dimensional constraint shown in grey was extracted from the isospin diffusion work of Tsang *et al.*  and has become a benchmark comparison for studies of the nuclear EoS from heavy-ion collisions to neutron star observations . Recently, Kohley *et al.* used radioactive-ion beam induced reactions to derive constraints on the form of the symmetry energy which are presented in Fig. [\[f:Lesym\]](#f:Lesym){reference-type="ref" reference="f:Lesym"} as the shaded blue region . Good agreement is observed between the two constraints even though the reaction mechanism, observable, and transport theory was different. Additional constraints on \(L\) at specific values of \(E_{sym}(\rho_{0})\) from heavy-ion collisions are also presented. Around a value of \(E_{sym}(\rho_{0}) = 32.5\) MeV (the value based on fitting binding energies ) the results suggest the slope of the symmetry energy to be near 70 MeV. While it is clear that further experiments and theoretical comparisons are necessary to continue to define the form of the symmetry energy it is encouraging to see relatively consistent results coming from very different analyses. It is worth noting that higher order Taylor expansion terms, such as the curvature (\(K_{sym}\)), will also be important to compare for constraints farther away from the saturation density. ## Transport theory discussion While the constraints show some consistency, they are strongly dependent on comparisons with theoretical transport calculations. Therefore, the results depend not only on the form of the symmetry energy but also on the treatment of the nuclear dynamics in that specific model . We would like to emphasize the importance of the work by Rizzo *et al*.  and Colonna *et al*.  in which detailed studies of different transport calculations are examined. The comparison of the SMF and AMD models demonstrated how the description of the nuclear dynamics can change the multi-fragmentation process and, thus, effect the HIC observables used in constraining the symmetry energy. Fig. [\[f:maria\]](#f:maria){reference-type="ref" reference="f:maria"} shows a comparison of a \(^{112}\)Sn + \(^{112}\)Sn reaction at 50 MeV/u from the AMD and SMF models. From the density contours alone differences in the dynamics can be observed. The AMD model shows a faster expansion after the initial collision while the SMF model presents a larger nucleon emission (or an increased \"gas\" phase). The results of the study showed that the one-body (SMF) versus many-body (AMD) effects can significantly change the fragmentation properties of the reactions. One observable suggested to be sensitive to these correlations is the production of light (\(Z > 2\)) and heavy (\(Z > 6\)) intermediate mass fragments. It is clear that accurate constraints on the density dependence of the symmetry energy will require consistent theoretical descriptions of the experimental data. For example, examination of experimental \(\pi^{-}\)/\(\pi^{+}\) ratios with the mean-field model IBUU04 suggested a soft symmetry energy at high densities . In contrast, a stiff form of the symmetry energy was found to better reproduce the same \(\pi^{+}\)/\(\pi^{-}\) data when using the improved isospin dependent quantum molecular dynamics (ImIQMD) model . Similarly, the sensitivity of neutron-to-proton (*n*/*p*) ratios to the density dependence of the symmetry was shown to be widely different depending on the choice of the theoretical simulation . Kohley *et al.* also compared the \(R_{Flow}\) observable (shown in Fig. [\[f:Koh10\]](#f:Koh10){reference-type="ref" reference="f:Koh10"}) to three different transport calculations to examine the dependence of the sensitivity of the symmetry energy to the description of the reaction dynamics . Overall, the different studies demonstrate the importance in comparing multiple theoretical calculations to the same HIC observable(s) in order to validate any constraints. Along with comparison between models, it is also crucial to understand how the different parameters within a single model can effect the outcome. Zhang *et al.*  and Coupland *et al.*  explored how adjustments to the input physics (in-medium cross section and momentum dependent interactions) of the transport calculations can also affect the resulting HIC observables. # Summary Production of nuclear matter at densities, temperatures, and pressures away from ground state nuclear matter is vital for mapping out the nuclear EoS. Heavy-ion collisions provide, likely, the best mechanism for producing and studying nuclear matter as a function of density, temperature, and pressure in a terrestrial laboratory. In the presented review two approaches in using heavy-ion collisions to probe the EoS were presented: (1) the direct approach in which the measured fragment yields are linked "directly" to the symmetry energy and (2) the indirect approach based on the comparison of transport calculations with experimentally measured observables to identify the effective nucleon-nucleon interactions (and corresponding EoS) which best reproduce the data. While much effort has been focused on extracting the density dependence of the symmetry energy it is important to recognize that for many of these studies the temperature is not constant. For measurements based on ground state binding energies and nuclear structure the temperature is well determined. However in heavy ion collisions the temperature, as well as the density, changes through the course of the collision. The temperature dependence of the symmetry is an important parameter in understanding the dynamical evolution of massive stars. Techniques have been developed which can allow for information on the density, temperature, and symmetry energy to be extracted, with assumptions, directly from the heavy-ion collisions measurements. A compilation of the results from these measurements was shown in Fig. [\[f:csym\]](#f:csym){reference-type="ref" reference="f:csym"} for the extracted \(C_{sym}\) as a function of excitation energy and temperature. In the cases that the analysis was similar the results show that the isoscaling method is relatively robust producing results in good agreement. Of particular interest was the results of Ogul which were corrected for secondary decay effects and the heavy residue isoscaling results of Souliotis. The results agreed well and suggest that the heavy residue isoscaling could be a probe that is less susceptible to secondary decay effects. Further investigation of heavy fragment isoscaling is certainty encouraged. In order to move forward in the direct measurements more exclusive experiments must be done that measure in coincidence both the density and the temperature as well as the observable connected to the symmetry energy. The indirect approach is strongly dependent on the theoretical transport calculations but has been demonstrated to provide a powerful avenue for constraining the density dependence of the symmetry energy. The experimental and theoretical efforts in studying the isospin diffusion process produced competitive constraints on the slope and magnitude of the symmetry energy. Further verification of these constraints was provided through a separate experiment using a radioactive ion beam induced reaction and extracted similar constraints. The current constraints on the density dependence of the symmetry energy were presented in Fig. [\[f:Lesym\]](#f:Lesym){reference-type="ref" reference="f:Lesym"}. While rather large uncertainty remains, the agreement between the different constraints is impressive since they derive from different reaction mechanisms, observables, and transport theories. Further development of the models and comparison of various models with multiple experimental observables at the same time will be important for continued refinement of the heavy-ion collision constraints. The current progress and results presented in this review should demonstrate the immense opportunities available in the field for continuing to constrain the nuclear EoS with heavy-ion collisions.

{'timestamp': '2014-01-23T02:02:53', 'yymm': '1401', 'arxiv_id': '1401.5533', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5533'}

# Introduction {#par:intro} For the past several years the idea of quantum simulators has found its implementation in the ultracold atomic gas systems . Trapped by an external magnetic or/and electric fields--for example in an optical lattice--ultracold gases are systems of extreme purity and tunability. Manipulation of external fields provides a possibility to simulate various phenomena from different areas of physics. Currently a lot of attention is attracted to the so-called synthetic gauge fields, see for example reviews  and references therein, and in particular to the simulation of the spin-orbit coupling , which is--in a broader sense--a coupling between a particle's pseudo-spin and its motion. In our research we consider spin-orbit coupled particles in a trap and how the deformation of a trapping potential affects the energy spectrum. One can find an example of such a system in semiconductor nanostructure physics . # System. {#par:system} We consider a system of identical fermionic particles with a pseudo-spin-\(\frac{1}{2}\) degree of freedom. The system is confined in a two-dimensional (2D) harmonic oscillator trap. We take the spin-orbit interaction in the so-called Rashba form . We approximate the two-particle repulsive interaction via the contact potential, with the restriction that the particles can interact only in the spin singlet channel due to the Pauli exclusion principle. The Hamiltonian operator for such a system is written as \[\label{eq:hamiltonian} \hat H = \sum_{i=1}^{N} \left ( \frac{\mathbf {p_i^2}}{2m} + \frac{1}{2} m (\omega_x^2 x_i^2 + \omega_y^2 y_i^2) \right ) \otimes \hat I + \alpha_R \sum_{i=1}^{N} ({\hat \sigma_{xi}} {p_{yi}}-{\hat \sigma_{yi}} {p_{xi}}) + \frac{1}{2} g \sum_{i \neq j} \delta(\mathbf r_i-\mathbf r_j) \hat P_s,\] where \(N\) is the number of particles, \(\mathbf{p_i} = \{p_{xi}, p_{yi}\}\) and \(\mathbf{r_i} = \{x_{i}, y_{i}\}\) are the 2D momentum and coordinate operators, \(m\) is the particles' mass, \(\omega_x\) and \(\omega_y\) are the frequencies of the harmonic oscillator trap in the directions \(x\) and \(y\), \(\hat I\) is the \(2 \times 2\) unit matrix, \(\alpha_R\) is the strength of the spin-orbit coupling, \(\hat \sigma_x\) and \(\hat \sigma_y\) are the \(2 \times 2\) Pauli matrices, \(g > 0\) is the strength of the interaction, \(\delta(\mathbf r_i-\mathbf r_j)\) is the Dirac delta function and \(\hat P_s\) is the spin singlet operator, which acts on spinor wave functions in the following way: \(\hat P_s \bigl(\begin{smallmatrix} a\\ b \end{smallmatrix} \bigr)_i \bigl(\begin{smallmatrix} c\\ d \end{smallmatrix} \bigr)_j = \frac{1}{2} (a d-b c) \left [ \bigl(\begin{smallmatrix} 1\\ 0 \end{smallmatrix} \bigr)_i \bigl(\begin{smallmatrix} 0\\ 1 \end{smallmatrix} \bigr)_j-\bigl(\begin{smallmatrix} 0\\ 1 \end{smallmatrix} \bigr)_i \bigl(\begin{smallmatrix} 1\\ 0 \end{smallmatrix} \bigr)_j \right ]\), where indices \(i\) and \(j\) (\(i \neq j\)) show that the spinors correspond to different particles. # Energy spectrum. {#par:spectrum} The single-particle case was previously investigated by means of an exact diagonalization method . To investigate the system of \(N\) fermions we implement the Hartree-Fock mean field method. We consider an ansatz that the \(N\)-body wave function is a Slater determinant--an antisymmetrized product of the single-particle wave functions. In order to find the approximation to the ground state energy of the system we minimize the energy functional \(E[\Psi] = \frac{\langle \Psi \mid \hat H \mid \Psi \rangle}{\langle \Psi \mid \Psi \rangle}\), where \(\Psi\) is the Hartree-Fock \(N\)-body wave function and \(\hat H\) is the system's Hamiltonian. This minimization gives the self-consistent Hartree-Fock equations, that can be solved iteratively: on every step we, using the same routines that we used for the single-particle case, obtain a set of eigenstates and eigenvalues which are used to construct the \(N\)-body wave function for the next iteration. The procedure continues until the ground state energy is converged. Fig. 1 shows the energy levels of the system as function of the dimensionless spin-orbit strength parameter, \(\alpha_R / \sqrt{\frac{m}{2\hbar \omega_y}}\), for different deformations. One can see that the density of states of both single-particle and N-particle systems depend on the deformation of the trap. For a strong deformation the lowest levels are equidistant and show the one-dimensional behavior--the energy decreases as \(-m \alpha_R^2 / 2\). In the case when the ratio of the frequencies is rational but not an integer number (center panel of Fig. 1) the states are more evenly distributed. We see that the Hartree-Fock single-particle energy levels are shifted compared to the single-particle case, but the overall structure stays very similar. This spectrum is a special case of the so-called Fock-Darwin spectrum .

{'timestamp': '2014-01-24T02:05:50', 'yymm': '1401', 'arxiv_id': '1401.5914', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5914'}

# Introduction The Energetic Gamma-Ray Experiment Telescope (EGRET) detected 66 active galactic nuclei (AGN) with \(\gamma\)-ray emission at energies greater than 100 MeV. Almost all of the AGN identified were blazars, triggering immense interest and prompting a series of studies focused on the multi-wavelength properties of these AGN. EGRET's successor, the Large Area Telescope (LAT, onboard the *Fermi Gamma-Ray Space Telescope*), has identified over 1000 \(\gamma\)-ray sources with energies greater than 100 MeV, revealing the \(\gamma\)-ray sky in detail. The LAT instrument presents the opportunity to revisit questions first examined in the EGRET era with far superior data. EGRET's discovery opened a new direction in investigating the nature and physical processes of blazars. Blazars are radio sources characterized by a compact core and relativistic jets that are aligned at a small angle to our observational line-of-sight, i.e. flat-spectrum radio quasars and BL Lac objects. It is supposed that \(\gamma\)-ray emission from AGN is produced from inverse-Compton (IC) processes occuring within the jets and becomes apparently enhanced via relativistic beaming. Although there is good support for this scenario, several questions remain, particularly with respect to the origin of \(\gamma\)-ray production within the jets, as well as how IC processes act to produce \(\gamma\)-ray emission. Relativistic beaming (or Doppler boosting) is evidenced by other associated properties that characterize blazars: high \(\gamma\)-ray luminosity (which comprises a large portion of the total radiative output); apparent superluminal motion; and rapid variability from radio to \(\gamma\)-ray wavelengths. From the non-thermal nature of this emission, it is understood that it is produced from within the AGN jets and is relativistically beamed along the line-of-sight. This could explain why \(\gamma\)-ray-loud AGN are also radio-loud but not all radio-loud AGN are \(\gamma\)-ray-loud. If \(\gamma\)-ray emitting regions move at faster speeds than radio emitting regions, \(\gamma\)-ray emission would be Doppler boosted within a narrower cone. Outside the \(\gamma\)-ray beaming cone and within the radio beaming cone, \(\gamma\)-ray radiation would be Doppler dimmed, giving the appearance of a \(\gamma\)-ray-quiet yet radio-loud AGN. A second possibility suggests that the appearance of \(\gamma\)-ray emission may be related to AGN jet-bending. If a bend in the jet occurs downstream of the \(\gamma\)-emitting region and upstream of regions of extended radio emission, the emissions would be Doppler-boosted in alignment to their respective sections of jet. As such, it may be possible that \(\gamma\)-ray emission is beamed away from us whilst radio emission is beamed towards us due to a better alignment of the radio-emitting jet section with our line-of-sight. Several studies have compared \(\gamma\)-ray-loud and \(\gamma\)-ray-quiet AGN populations with respect to characteristics of the AGN core and jet components. Statistically significant differences between these populations are found for core brightness temperature, jet opening angles and core polarization. The distinction between populations is also established for radio flux density variability between \(\gamma\)-ray-loud and \(\gamma\)-ray-quiet AGN, suggesting that radio and \(\gamma\)-ray emission are produced within the same region within AGN jets. propose that radio-to-\(\gamma\)-ray variability is caused by oblique shocks in the AGN jets. The role of oblique shocks has also been explored in jets on parsec and kiloparsec scales. finds a correlation between \(\gamma\)-ray and radio flux in AGN after consideration of biases unaccounted for in previous studies. Studies have also correlated superluminal ejections and \(\gamma\)-ray flares in AGN jets, suggesting that \(\gamma\)-ray emission is produced within the parsec-scale region of the jets. Furthermore, studies have related \(\gamma\)-ray emission with jet kinematics, and there is evidence to suggest that FSRQs and BL Lac objects may have intrinsically different mechanisms for \(\gamma\)-ray emission. In examining the jet bend scenario of, used EGRET identifications to compare \(\gamma\)-ray-loud and \(\gamma\)-ray-quiet AGN with respect to their jet-bending characteristics. Their results showed a tendency in \(\gamma\)-ray-quiet sources to both have more jet bends and more pronounced jet-bend angles at parsec scales. did not find evidence to support this scenario, but their study was limited in only examining parsec-to-kiloparsec jet misalignment angles. The jet bend proposition was revisited in and with inconclusive results (limited to 4 EGRET candidates and 30 LAT sources respectively). Similarly, found that no significant difference in jet-bend angles between \(\gamma\)-ray-loud and \(\gamma\)-ray-quiet populations (limited to 19 LAT sources). Utilizing LAT's superior \(\gamma\)-ray detection capabilities and a larger sample size, we re-examine the suggestion that jet-bending may be a significant factor for the detection of \(\gamma\)-ray emission in AGN. We follow the analysis of Paper I, testing the statistical significance of jet-bend angles, as well as the number of bends between \(\gamma\)-ray-loud and \(\gamma\)-ray-quiet AGN. We use the 'Clean Sample' of the second LAT AGN catalog and VLBI images accessible in the published literature or from the Radio Fundamental Catalog (RFC, version 'rfc2013d'). We examine the statistics of two samples, a large but inhomogeneous sample and a smaller but homogeneous subsample based on. # Sample Definitions In order to investigate the significance of jet-bending between \(\gamma\)-ray-loud and \(\gamma\)-ray-quiet AGN populations, we surveyed the literature for VLBI images and measured source properties. ## The RFC-Based Sample The most recent version of the RFC contains 8310 compact radio sources studied in 5719 VLBI observing sessions, making it the most complete catalog of radio sources with available VLBI data. We have compared the RFC with the CRATES catalog, a nearly uniform survey of of flat-spectrum radio sources (\(\alpha >-0.5\)) containing flux densities and spectral indices for over 11,000 objects. By cross-referencing data from the CRATES catalog to sources in the RFC, we obtain a large pool of sources to apply selection criteria and draw upon in order to define a 'RFC-Based Sample' for the purpose of our investigation. There are a number of considerations in formulating our selection criteria for the RFC-Based Sample. A true cross-identification between radio/X-ray and \(\gamma\)-ray counterparts can only be determined when there is a correlation in variability in both bands. In practice, cross-identifications were made only for 28 sources in the 2-Year Fermi-LAT Sources Catalog. As such, most sources identified as \(\gamma\)-ray-loud in 2LAC are high-confidence statistical associations determined by three association methods using the detected positions and uncertainties of radio/X-ray and \(\gamma\)-ray emissions within a source's 95% error ellipse, along with the physical properties of likely candidates. The determination of a high-confidence association in 2LAC is also subject to a number of considerations. Candidate gamma-ray sources are 'detected' in 2FGL if a region of concentrated flux against its background obtains a test statistic TS \(>\) 25 (corresponding to over 4 \(\sigma\) significance). There is low availability of spectroscopic information for radio sources in southern declinations. There are in some case multiple associations within a gamma-ray source's 95% error ellipse. A candidate's gamma-ray spectral intensity may not lie within LAT's energy-dependent sensitivity curve. Candidates with weak radio flux would also have reduced likelihoods of association as they become indistinguishable from other weak radio sources within the LAT error ellipse. These factors would cause bias to higher unassociated AGN despite possibly having detectable \(\gamma\)-ray flux. To address these issues, we employ the 'Clean Sample' subset of 2LAC where sources are excluded if they presented difficulties in the analysis of making an association. We also apply a low threshold to flux densities to account for the possibility of false non-associations below the cutoff. There is also possible bias introduced by \(\gamma\)-ray attenuation due to the Extragalactic Background Light (EBL), resulting in a lower rate of association at higher redshifts. Predictions from EBL models show that \(\gamma\)-rays with energies below \(\sim\) 10 GeV from redshifts up to z \(\sim\) 3 do not undergo significant attenuation, and find no redshift dependence in the flux ratio of \(\gamma\)-ray photons F(\(>\) 10 GeV)/F(\(>\) 1 GeV) across blazar subclasses from z = 0 to above z = 2. Applying an upper limit to redshift can eliminate the possibility of this bias in our sample. Furthermore, errors in modelling the diffuse \(\gamma\)-ray background near the Galactic ridge or in nearby interstellar cloud regions may introduce false associations between \(\gamma\)-ray and radio emissions belonging to two distinct sources, identifying '\(\gamma\)-ray-loud' AGNs that are actually \(\gamma\)-ray-quiet. However, 2LAC selection criteria include only sources with high Galactic latitudes (\(|b| > 10^{\circ}\)), eliminating the possibility of false or non-associations occuring near the Galactic ridge. In review of these factors in \(\gamma\)-ray detection and source association, our source selection criteria are therefore as follows: 1. identified in RFC; 2. Galactic latitude \(|b| > 10^{\circ}\); 3. total 4.85 GHz flux density \(S_{4.85} > 0.8\) Jy; 4. redshift z \(<\) 2; 5. spectral index \(\alpha_{4.85/low} >-0.5\); 6. included in Clean Sample if included in 2LAC; 7. associated with VLBI images in literature. These criteria define our RFC-Based Sample, consisting of 351 AGN in total. The sample contains 151 \(\gamma\)-ray-loud AGN from the Clean Sample, a subset of sources from the second LAT catalog that possess high-confidence associations between radio and \(\gamma\)-ray counterparts (see Table [\[tab:gl_list\]](#tab:gl_list){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:gl_list"}). A \(\gamma\)-ray-quiet subsample was defined by the 200 AGN not detected by LAT (see Table [\[tab:gq_list\]](#tab:gq_list){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:gq_list"}). ## The MOJAVE Subample We consider a subsample of the RFC-Based Sample defined by sources existing in MOJAVE to investigate concerns of sample inhomogeneity. The 'MOJAVE Subsample' is an unbiased subset since the sources included conform to our selection criteria for the RFC-Based Sample. The sample contains 65 \(\gamma\)-ray-loud AGN and 29 \(\gamma\)-ray-quiet AGN, giving a total sample of 94 AGN. The sources were observed using the VLBA and processed uniformly. The selection criteria used in MOJAVE are also relatively homogeneous, only departing slightly from uniformity in the criterion for radio flux density between AGN at northern (1.5 Jy) and southern (2.0 Jy) declinations to account for differences in instrument sensitivity. The high fidelity imaging of this sample makes it ideal for jet-bend measurements. The sample is also relatively large, which is advantageous from a statistical standpoint. The data from MOJAVE were not available when Paper I was published. All MOJAVE AGN were imaged at 15 GHz in the period August 1994 to September 2007. # Results & Discussion suggest two scenarios where jet bending could influence \(\gamma\)-ray detection in radio-loud AGN. If \(\gamma\)-ray emission is produced within an AGN jet, and if the jet bends significantly downstream of the \(\gamma\)-ray emitting region, there is a possibility that the \(\gamma\)-ray emission is beamed away from our line of sight (Doppler-dimmed) whilst radio emission is beamed towards us. In this case we would observe a \(\gamma\)-ray-quiet but radio-loud AGN. The other possibility is that there may be AGN with jets either with no bends or with bends upstream of the \(\gamma\)-ray-emitting region, producing aligned radio and \(\gamma\)-ray beaming cones. In this case, we would observe a \(\gamma\)-ray and radio-loud AGN. Such possibilities may account for \(\gamma\)-ray observations not otherwise explained by relativistic beaming. Two other simple scenarios may also be considered. First, objects for which we lie within the \(\gamma\)-ray beaming cone but not the radio beaming cone. Such sources would be observable to us as \(\gamma\)-ray-loud, radio quiet AGN. However, it is reasonable to assume that substantial radio emission occurs in regions of \(\gamma\)-ray emission, making this scenario unlikely. Second, AGN jets for which both \(\gamma\)-ray and radio beaming cones are misaligned with our line of sight. These sources will likely not be identified in \(\gamma\)-rays and may appear as weak radio sources. In our approach, the number of parsec-scale jet bends and the maximum parsec-scale jet-bending angles are recorded for AGN with VLBI images that present a discernible jet structure from which jet-bend data may be extracted. The hypothesis of allows the possibility that jet-bending could be significant on kiloparsec scales. However, neither nor Paper I find a significant difference in the parsec-to-kiloparsec misalignment angle between \(\gamma\)-ray-loud and \(\gamma\)-ray-quiet populations. In addition, Paper I does not find a statistically significant difference in the number of kiloparsec-scale jet-bends. More recent investigations assert that \(\gamma\)-ray emission originates in the parsec-scale region, near the core, although the precise region continues to be discussed. In the scenario proposed in these studies, both \(\gamma\)-ray and radio emission may be produced far upstream of any kiloparsec-scale bending, allowing the detection of both kinds of emission regardless of the existence of kiloparsec bending. Kiloparsec-scale bending does not appear to impact \(\gamma\)-ray detection in AGN, consistent across a number of studies, and is not explored here. We applied the following method to our jet-bending measurements. For a given AGN, we compared VLBI images available from the RFC and in other major surveys. Considering the resolution and common features between epochs, we determined the AGN's jet structure that could be discernable by eye. In this process, we assume that an abrupt change in the apparent direction of a jet, associated with a 'shock' region of high flux density, corresponds to the bending between two jet sections. We selected the best VLBI image to derive its jet properties, with preference always given to available MOJAVE images due to their superior image quality. The initial angle of the jet from the core was measured east of north in the equatorial coordinate system. The angles of any existing bends in the jet are then measured (in the same sense) with respect to the previous jet trajectory closer to the core. The number of bends and the maximum jet-bending angle were then recorded for each source, shown in Tables [\[tab:gl_list\]](#tab:gl_list){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:gl_list"} and [\[tab:gq_list\]](#tab:gq_list){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:gq_list"}. There are a number of factors affecting an AGN's derived jet properties. Inhomogeneity is introduced from the variable resolution and sensitivity of VLBI instrumentation, the choice of radio frequency for imaging, and different image epochs for different sets of images associated with a particular AGN. As such, the low fidelity of some VLBI images may affect the consistency of jet measurements across the whole sample. Despite this, using the best available VLBI images for each AGN will provide the most accurate jet-bending properties to retest the jet-bending hypothesis. The ability to resolve jet components also diminishes with decreasing radio flux density. In weak radio sources, this is particularly evident in the reduced ability to resolve low flux density jet components (and therefore jet bending) at large distances from the core. Deflections in jets may not be obvious at small jet-bending angles, and where there are jet-bends, they may not occur at a single, well-defined point along the jet. The comparison between multiple VLBI images of AGN across different imaging frequencies and epochs also allows us to obtain jet properties that reflect the jet structure from the observer's point of view as accurately as possible. Furthermore, bright individual features with different trajectories within or around a jet may also give the false appearance of jet bending in jet structure in certain imaging epochs. Comparing VLBI images at different epochs assists in identifying bright regions that may temporarily distort the appearance of the jet structure. Measurements are subject to image fidelity and morphological interpretation, however, these considerations should provide a robust result when testing the significance of jet bending in \(\gamma\)-ray detection compared to the findings of previous, more-limited studies. We employ a number of statistical tests to explore differences between \(\gamma\)-ray-loud and \(\gamma\)-ray-quiet populations in our sample. A two-sided Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) two-sample test was used to determine the statistical significance of differences at 4.85 GHz flux density and maximum jet-bend angle distributions between \(\gamma\)-ray-loud and \(\gamma\)-ray-quiet AGN populations. Since the values for the number of jet bends are discrete, a \(\chi^{2}\) test was applied to characterize differences between the distributions in this case. 13 \(\gamma\)-ray-loud and 32 \(\gamma\)-ray-quiet sources did not show discernible jets and thus were omitted from the statistical testing of jet properties. For all tests, the difference between sample populations is considered significant for a given property when, assuming the null hypothesis represents both samples being drawn from the same parent population, the probability of observing a test statistic at least as extreme as the one obtained (\(p(H_{0})\)) is less than 0.05 (95% confidence that the null hypothesis can be rejected). These results are summarized in Table [\[tab:agn_stat\]](#tab:agn_stat){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:agn_stat"}. ## The RFC-Based Sample Figures [\[fig:lfx_agn_gl\]](#fig:lfx_agn_gl){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:lfx_agn_gl"} and [\[fig:lfx_agn_gq\]](#fig:lfx_agn_gq){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:lfx_agn_gq"} show similar distributions for AGN total flux densities at 4.85 GHz. A K-S test determines that the probability that the two samples have been drawn from the same parent population is \(p(H_{0}) = 0.121\), finding no statistically significant difference between the two distributions. The result gives confidence that there no biases in LAT detections that may skew jet-bending statistics. We now consider the jet-bending statistics of \(\gamma\)-ray-loud and \(\gamma\)-ray-quiet samples. The distributions between samples for the number of jet bends (Figures [\[fig:nb_agn_gl\]](#fig:nb_agn_gl){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:nb_agn_gl"} and [\[fig:nb_agn_gq\]](#fig:nb_agn_gq){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:nb_agn_gq"}) show no significant differences. A \(\chi^{2}\) test finds a statistically insignificant probability of \(p(H_{0}) = 0.945\) (\(\chi^{2} = 0.112\) with 2 degrees of freedom). Similarly, histograms for the parsec-scale maximum jet-bend angle (Figures [\[fig:mb_agn_gl\]](#fig:mb_agn_gl){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:mb_agn_gl"} and [\[fig:mb_agn_gq\]](#fig:mb_agn_gq){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:mb_agn_gq"}) demonstrate no significant difference between the two populations. The probability that the two samples belong to the same parent population is \(p(H_{0}) = 0.998\). ## The MOJAVE Subsample We find that there are no statistically significant differences between \(\gamma\)-ray-loud and \(\gamma\)-ray-quiet AGN populations for any of the tested properties. The results of the statistical tests on the MOJAVE Subsample are given in Table [\[tab:agn_stat\]](#tab:agn_stat){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:agn_stat"}. The \(\gamma\)-ray-loud and \(\gamma\)-ray-quiet distributions for these properties are shown in Figure [\[fig:lmn_mjv\]](#fig:lmn_mjv){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:lmn_mjv"}. # Summary We have investigated the suggestion that \(\gamma\)-ray-quiet AGN have a larger tendency for jet bending than \(\gamma\)-ray-loud AGN. We present a statistical analysis of a large sample of AGN that represents the population of radio-loud AGN, using data from the Fermi LAT instrument. We also conducted an analysis of a homogeneous subsample (MOJAVE) to address the inhomogeneity of selection criteria and VLBI image quality in the RFC-Based Sample. Our analysis of the RFC-Based Sample shows that jet-bending does not play a significant role in predicting \(\gamma\)-ray detectability in radio-loud AGN. As such our results do not support the suggestion of. This conclusion is in contradiction to Paper I, and supports the findings of. The contrast of results obtained by new data with those of Paper I reveals the strong dependence on the fidelity and homogeneity of VLBI images in jet-bend measurements. The limited quality and homogeneity of VLBI images available at the time of study appears to be the reason for the reported conclusions in Paper I. The results of the MOJAVE Subsample generally support the conclusions drawn from the RFC-Based Sample. Statistically insignificant results were found for both the number of parsec-scale jet bends and maximum parsec-scale jet bend, indicating that the RFC-Based Sample is not adversely affected by VLBI image inhomogeneity and giving additional confidence to the null result. We thank the referee for providing helpful comments and suggestions. This research has made use of data from the Radio Fundamental Catalog (RFC) maintained by L. Petrov, solution rfc2013d (unpublished, available on the Web at http://asrtogeo.org/vlbi/solutions/rfc2013d); the MOJAVE database, maintained by the MOJAVE team (Lister et al. 2009, AJ, 137, 3718); the CRATES catalog (Healey et al. 2007, ApJS, 171, 61); and the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED), operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

{'timestamp': '2014-02-06T02:02:36', 'yymm': '1401', 'arxiv_id': '1401.5926', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5926'}

# Introduction Let \(k\) be a field of characteristic 0 and \(\kbar\) a fixed algebraic closure of \(k\). Let \(G\) be a connected linear algebraic \(k\)-group. A birational isomorphism \(\phi \colon G \stackrel{\simeq}{\dashrightarrow} \Lie(G)\) is called a *Cayley map* if it is equivariant with respect to the conjugation action of \(G\) on itself and the adjoint action of \(G\) on its Lie algebra \(\Lie(G)\), respectively. A linear algebraic \(k\)-group \(G\) is called *Cayley* if it admits a Cayley map, and *stably Cayley* if \(G\times_k (\bbG_{{\text{\rm{m}}},k})^r\) is Cayley for some \(r \ge 0\). Here \(\bbG_{{\text{\rm{m}}},k}\) denotes the multiplicative group over \(k\). These notions were introduced by Lemire, Popov and Reichstein; for a more detailed discussion and numerous classical examples we refer the reader to . The main results of  are the classifications of Cayley and stably Cayley simple groups over an algebraically closed field \(k\) of characteristic \(0\). Over an arbitrary field \(k\) of characteristic 0 stably Cayley simple \(k\)-groups, stably Cayley simply connected semisimple \(k\)-groups and stably Cayley adjoint semisimple \(k\)-groups were classified in the paper of Borovoi, Kunyavskiı̆, Lemire and Reichstein. In the present paper, building on results of and, we classify all stably Cayley *semisimple*  \(k\)-groups (not necessarily simple, or simply connected, or adjoint) over an arbitrary field \(k\) of characteristic 0. By a semisimple (or reductive) \(k\)-group we always mean a *connected* semisimple (or reductive) \(k\)-group. We shall need the following result of extending. In this paper we classify stably Cayley semisimple groups over an *algebraically closed* field \(k\) of characteristic 0 (Theorem [\[thm:product\]](#thm:product){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:product"}) and, more generally, over an *arbitrary* field \(k\) of characteristic 0 (Theorem [\[thm:product-non-closed\]](#thm:product-non-closed){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:product-non-closed"}). Note that Theorem [\[thm:product\]](#thm:product){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:product"} was conjectured in. Note that the "if" assertions in Theorems [\[thm:product\]](#thm:product){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:product"} and [\[thm:product-non-closed\]](#thm:product-non-closed){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:product-non-closed"} follow immediately from the definitions. The rest of the paper is structured as follows. In Section [2](#sec:1){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:1"} we recall the definition of a quasi-permutation lattice and state some known results, in particular, an assertion from that reduces Theorem [\[thm:product\]](#thm:product){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:product"} to an assertion on lattices. In Sections [3](#sec:2){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:2"} and [\[sec:3\]](#sec:3){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:3"} we construct certain families of non-quasi-permutation lattices. In particular, we correct an inaccuracy in; see Remark [\[rem:mistake\]](#rem:mistake){reference-type="ref" reference="rem:mistake"}. In Section [\[sec:4\]](#sec:4){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:4"} we prove (in the language of lattices) Theorem [\[thm:product\]](#thm:product){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:product"} in the special case when \(G\) is isogenous to a direct product of simple groups of type \(\AA_{n-1}\) with \(n\ge 3\). In Section [\[sec:5\]](#sec:5){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:5"} we prove (again in the language of lattices) Theorem [\[thm:product\]](#thm:product){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:product"} in the general case. In Section [4](#sec:6){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:6"} we deduce Theorem [\[thm:product-non-closed\]](#thm:product-non-closed){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:product-non-closed"} from Theorem [\[thm:product\]](#thm:product){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:product"}. In Appendix [\[app\]](#app){reference-type="ref" reference="app"} we prove in terms of lattices only, that certain quasi-permutation lattices are indeed quasi-permutation. # Preliminaries on quasi-permutation groups and on character lattices {#sec:1} In this section we gather definitions and known results concerning quasi-permutation lattices, quasi-invertible lattices and character lattices that we need for the proofs of Theorems [\[thm:product\]](#thm:product){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:product"} and [\[thm:product-non-closed\]](#thm:product-non-closed){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:product-non-closed"}. For details see and. Note that if a \(\Gamma\)-lattice \(L\) is not quasi-invertible, then it is not quasi-permutation. Let \(\Z[\Gamma]\) denote the group ring of a finite group \(\Gamma\). We define the \(\Gamma\)-lattice \(J_\Gamma\) by the exact sequence \[0\to\Z\labelto{N}\Z[\Gamma]\to J_\Gamma\to 0,\] where \(N\) is the norm map, see. We refer to for a proof of the following result, due to Voskresenskiı̆ : Note that if \(\Gamma=\Z/2\Z\times \Z/2\Z\), then \(\rk J_\Gamma=3\). We shall use the following lemma from : We shall need the notion, due to and, of the character lattice of a reductive \(k\)-group \(G\) over a field \(k\). Let \(\kbar\) be a separable closure of \(k\). Let \(T\subset G\) be a maximal torus (defined over \(k\)). Set \(\Tbar=T\times_k \kbar\), \(\Gbar=G\times_k \kbar\). Let \(\XX(\Tbar)\) denote the character group of \(\Tbar:=T\times_k \kbar\). Let \(W=W(\Gbar,\Tbar):=\mathcal{N}_G(\Tbar)/\Tbar\) denote the Weyl group, it acts on \(\XX(\Tbar)\). Consider the canonical Galois action on \(\XX(\Tbar)\), it defines a homomorphism \(\Gal(\kbar/k)\to\Aut\XX(\Tbar)\). The image \(\im\,\rho\subset \Aut\XX(\Tbar)\) normalizes \(W\), hence \(\im\, \rho\,\cdot W\) is a subgroup of \(\Aut\XX(\Tbar)\). By the character lattice of \(G\) we mean the pair \(\X(G):=(\im\, \rho\cdot W,\,\XX(\Tbar))\) (up to an isomorphism it does not depend on the choice of \(T\)). In particular, if \(k\) is algebraically closed, then \(\X(G)=(W,\XX(T))\). We shall reduce Theorem [\[thm:product\]](#thm:product){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:product"} to an assertion about quasi-permutation lattices using the following result due to : We shall use the following result due to Cortella and Kunyavskiı̆ and to Lemire, Popov and Reichstein. # A family of non-quasi-permutation lattices {#sec:2} In this section we construct a family of non-quasi-permutation (even non-quasi-invertible) lattices. To prove the lemma, first consider case (i). For all \(i\) such that \(D_i\) is of type \(\DD_{l_i}\) with *odd* \(l_i\), we partition \(S_i\) into three non-empty subsets of odd cardinalities. For all the other \(i\) we take \(S_{i,1}=S_i\), \(S_{i,2}=S_{i,3}=\emptyset\). Then \(U_1\neq\emptyset\) (note that \(m\ge 1\)) and [\[align:vk\]](#align:vk){reference-type="eqref" reference="align:vk"} is satisfied. In case (ii), if one of the \(D_i\) is of type \(\DD_{l_i}\) where \(l_i \ge 3\) is *odd,* then we partition \(S_i\) for each such \(D_i\) into three non-empty subsets of odd cardinalities. We partition all the other \(S_{i}\) as follows: \[\label{e.Si} \text{\(S_{i, 1} = S_{i, 2} = \emptyset\) and \(S_{i, 3} = S_i\).}\] Clearly \(U_1, U_2, U_3 \neq \emptyset\) and [\[align:vk\]](#align:vk){reference-type="eqref" reference="align:vk"} is satisfied. If there is no \(D_i\) of type \(\DD_{l_i}\) with odd \(l_i \ge 3\), but one of the \(D_i\), say for \(i=i_0\), is \(\DD_l\) with *even* \(l \ge 4\), then we partition \(S_{i_0}\) into two non-empty subsets \(S_{i_0,1}\) and \(S_{i_0,2}\) of even cardinalities, and set \(S_{i_0,3}=\emptyset\). We partition the sets \(S_i\) for \(i\neq i_0\) as in [\[e.Si\]](#e.Si){reference-type="eqref" reference="e.Si"} (note that by our assumption \(m\ge 2\)). Once again, \(U_1, U_2, U_3 \neq \emptyset\) and [\[align:vk\]](#align:vk){reference-type="eqref" reference="align:vk"} is satisfied. If there is no \(D_i\) of type \(\DD_{l_i}\) with \(l_i \ge 3\) (odd or even), but one of the \(D_i\), say for \(i=i_0\), is of type \(\BB_l\) with \(l\ge 2\), we partition \(S_{i_0}\) into two non-empty subsets \(S_{i_0,1}\) and \(S_{i_0,2}\), and set \(S_{i_0,3}=\emptyset\). We partition the sets \(S_i\) for \(i\neq i_0\) as in [\[e.Si\]](#e.Si){reference-type="eqref" reference="e.Si"} (again, note that \(m\ge 2\)). Once again, \(U_1, U_2, U_3 \neq \emptyset\) and [\[align:vk\]](#align:vk){reference-type="eqref" reference="align:vk"} is satisfied. Since by our assumption not all of \(D_i\) are of type \(\BB_1\) or \(\DD_2\), we have exhausted all the cases. This completes the proof of Lemma [\[lem.partitions\]](#lem.partitions){reference-type="ref" reference="lem.partitions"}. 0◻ We continue proving Proposition [\[prop:one-vector\]](#prop:one-vector){reference-type="ref" reference="prop:one-vector"}. We construct an embedding \(\Gamma\into W\). For \(s\in S\) we denote by \(c_s\) the automorphism of \(L\) taking the basis vector \(e_s\) to \(-e_s\) and fixing all the other basis vectors. For \(\iota=1,\dots,\mu\) we define \(\tau_\iota^{(12)}=\Transp((\iota,1),(\iota,2))\in W_\iota\) (the transposition of the basis vectors \(\ve_{\iota,1}\) and \(\ve_{\iota,2}\)). Set \[\tau_\iota^{>2}=\Transp((\iota,3),(\iota,4))\cdot\ \cdots\ \cdot\Transp((\iota,2n_\iota-1),(\iota,2n_\iota))\in W_\iota.\] Write \(\Gamma=\{e,\gamma_1,\gamma_2,\gamma_3\}\) and define an embedding \(j\colon \Gamma\into W\) as follows: \[\begin{aligned} j(\gamma_1)&=\prod_{s\in S\smallsetminus U_1} c_s\ \cdot\ \prod_{\iota=1}^\mu \tau_\iota^{(12)}\tau_\iota^{>2}\,;\\ j(\gamma_2)&=\prod_{s\in S\smallsetminus U_2} c_s\ \cdot\ \prod_{\iota=1}^\mu \tau_\iota^{(12)}\,;\\ j(\gamma_3)&=\prod_{s\in S\smallsetminus U_3} c_s\ \cdot\ \prod_{\iota=1}^\mu \tau_\iota^{>2}\. \end{aligned}\] Note that if \(D_i\) is of type \(\DD_{l_i}\), then by [\[align:vk\]](#align:vk){reference-type="eqref" reference="align:vk"} for \(\vk=1,2,3\) the cardinality \(\#(S_i\smallsetminus S_{i,\vk})\) is even, hence the product of \(c_s\) over \(s\in S_i\smallsetminus S_{i,\vk}\) is contained in \(W(D_i)\) for all such \(i\), and therefore, \(j(\gamma_\vk)\in W\). Since \(j(\gamma_1)\), \(j(\gamma_2)\) and \(j(\gamma_3)\) commute, are of order 2, and \(j(\gamma_1) j(\gamma_2)=j(\gamma_3)\), we see that \(j\) is a homomorphism. If \(\mu\ge 1\), then, since \(2n_1\ge 4\), clearly \(j(\gamma_\vk)\neq 1\) for \(\vk=1,2,3\), hence \(j\) is an embedding. If \(\mu=0\), then the sets \(S\smallsetminus U_1\), \(S\smallsetminus U_2\) and \(S\smallsetminus U_3\) are nonempty, and again \(j(\gamma_\vk)\neq 1\) for \(\vk=1,2,3\), hence \(j\) is an embedding. We construct a \(\Gamma\)-sublattice \(L_0\) of rank 3. Write a vector \[\]\(where\)b_s ,\_,\(. Set\)n'=\_\^(n\_)\(. Define a\[-equivariant homomorphism\]\phi\colon L\to \Z^{n'},\quad\[(we skip\]). We obtain a short exact sequence of\[-lattices\]0\to L_1\to L\labelto{\phi} \Z^{n'}\to 0,\[where\)L_1:=\(. Since\]acts trivially on\)\^n'\(, we have\)L_1\~L\(. Therefore, it suffices to show that\)L_1\(is not quasi-invertible. \sms Recall that\[v=\ \half\sum_{s\in S}e_s+\half\sum_{\iota=1}^\mu\]Set\)v_1=\_1v, v_2=\_2v, v_3=\_3v.\(Set\[L_0=\langle v, v_1,v_2,v_3\rangle.\]We have\[v_1=\ \half\sum_{s\in U_1}e_s -\half\sum_{s\in U_2\cup U_3}e_s -\half\sum_{\iota=1}^\mu\]whence \begin{equation}\label{e:sum1} v+v_1=\sum_{s\in U_1}e_s. \end{equation} We have\[v_2=\ \half\sum_{s\in U_2}e_s -\half\sum_{s\in U_1\cup U_3}e_s +\half\sum_{\iota=1}^\mu (-\]whence \begin{equation}\label{e:sum2} v+v_2=\sum_{s\in U_2}e_s + \sum_{\iota=1}^\mu \end{equation} We have\[v_3=\ \half\sum_{s\in U_3}e_s -\half\sum_{s\in U_1\cup U_2}e_s + \half\sum_{\iota=1}^\mu (\]whence \begin{equation}\label{e:sum3} v+v_3=\sum_{s\in U_3}e_s + \sum_{\iota=1}^\mu \end{equation} Clearly, we have\[v+v_1+v_2+v_3=0.\]Since the set\){v,v_1,v_2,v\_3}\(is the orbit of\)v\(under\[, the sublattice\)L_0=v, v_1,v_2,v_3L\(is\]-invariant. If\[, then\)U_1\(, and we see from \eqref{e:sum1}, \eqref{e:sum2} and \eqref{e:sum3} that\)L_0 \(. If\], then\)U_1,U_2,U_3\(, and again we see from \eqref{e:sum1}, \eqref{e:sum2} and \eqref{e:sum3} that\)L_0 \(. Thus\)L_0=3\(and\)L_0J\_\(, whence by Proposition \ref{prop:J-Gamma}\)L_0\(is not quasi-invertible. \sms \noindent {\em Step 4.} We show that\)L_0\(is a direct summand of\)L_1\(. Set\)m'=\|S\|\(. \sms First assume that\[. Choose\)u_1U_1S\(. Set\)S'=S{u_1}\(. For each\)sS'\((i.e.,\)su_1\() consider the one-dimensional (i.e., of rank 1) lattice\)X_s=e_s\(. We obtain\)m'-1\]\(-invariant one-dimensional sublattices of\)L_1\(. \sms Denote by\[the set of pairs\)(,)\(such that\)`<!-- -->`{=html}1\(,\)`<!-- -->`{=html}1n\_\(, and if\], then\),2\(. For each\)(,)\(consider the one-dimensional lattice\[\Xi_{\iota,\lambda}=\langle \ve_{\iota,2\lambda-1}-\ve_{\iota,2\lambda}\rangle.\]We obtain\)-2+\_\^n\_\(one-dimensional\[-invariant sublattices of\)L_1\(. \sms We show that \begin{equation}\label{e:d-sum} L_1=L_0\oplus \bigoplus_{s\in S'} X_s \oplus \bigoplus_{(\iota,\lambda)\in\Upsilon}\Xi_{\iota,\lambda}. \end{equation} Set\)L'\_1=L_0, (X_s)\_su_1, (\_,)\_(,)\(, then \begin{equation}\label{eq:dim-count1} \rk L'_1\leq 3+(m'-1)-2+\sum_{\iota=1}^\mu n_\iota= m'+\sum_{\iota=1}^\mu (2n_\iota-1)-\sum_{\iota=1}^\mu (n_\iota-1)=\rk L_1. \end{equation} Therefore, it suffices to check that\)L'\_1L_1\(. The set\]\{v\} \cup \{e_s\ |\ s\in S\}\cup\{\ve_{\iota,2\lambda-1}-\ve_{\iota,2\lambda}\ |\ 1\le\iota\le\mu,1\le \lambda\le n_\iota\}\[is a set of generators of\)L_1\(. By construction\)v,v_1,v_2,v_3L_0L'\_1\(. We have\)e_sX_sL'\_1\(for\)su_1\(. By \eqref{e:sum1}\)\_sU_1e_sL'\_1\(, hence\)e\_u_1L'\_1\(. By construction\]\ve_{\iota,2\lambda-1}-\ve_{\iota,2\lambda}\in L'_1,\ \text{ for all } (\iota,\lambda)\neq (1,1),(1,2) \.\[From \eqref{e:sum3} and \eqref{e:sum2} we see that\]\sum_{\iota=1}^\mu (\ve_{\iota,1}-\ve_{\iota,2})\in L'_1,\ \ \sum_{\iota=1}^\mu\[Thus\]\ve_{1,1}-\ve_{1,2}\in L'_1,\ \ \ve_{1,3}-\ve_{1,4}\in L'_1\.\[We conclude that\)L'\_1L_1\(, hence\)L_1=L'\_1\(. From dimension count \eqref{eq:dim-count1} we see that \eqref{e:d-sum} holds. \sms Now assume that\]. Then for each\),2,3\(we choose an element\)u_U\_\(and set\)U'\_=U\_{u\_}\(. We set\)S'=U'\_1U'\_2U'\_3=S{u_1,u_2,u_3}\(. Again for\)sS'\((i.e.,\)su_1,u_2,u_3\() consider the one-dimensional lattice\)X_s=e_s\(. We obtain\)m'-3\(one-dimensional\[-invariant sublattices of\)L_1=L\(. We show that \begin{equation}\label{e:e-sum} L_1=L_0\oplus \bigoplus_{s\in S'} X_s\. \end{equation} Set\)L'\_1=L_0, (X_s)\_sS' \(, then \begin{equation}\label{eq:dim-count2} \rk L'_1\leq 3+m'-3=m'=\rk L_1. \end{equation} Therefore, it suffices to check that\)L'\_1L_1\(. The set\){v} {e_s \| sS}\(is a set of generators of\)L_1=L\(. By construction\)v,v_1,v_2,v_3L_1'\(and\)e_sL_1'\(for\)su_1,u_2,u_3\(. We see from \eqref{e:sum1}, \eqref{e:sum2}, \eqref{e:sum3} that\)e_sL_1'\(also for\)s=u_1,u_2,u_3\(. Thus\)L'\_1L_1\(, hence\)L'\_1= L_1\(. From dimension count \eqref{eq:dim-count2} we see that \eqref{e:e-sum} holds. \sms We see that in both cases\]and\[, the sublattice\)L_0\(is a direct summand of\)L_1\(. Since by Proposition \ref{prop:J-Gamma}\)L_0\(is not quasi-invertible as a\]-lattice, it follows that\)L_1\(and\)L\(are not quasi-invertible as\[-lattices. Thus\)L\(is not quasi-invertible as a\)W\(-lattice. This completes the proof of Proposition \ref{prop:one-vector}. \end{proof} \begin{remark} Since\)\^2(,J\_)/2\((Voskresenski\u\i, see for the notation and the result), our argument shows that\)\^2(,L)/2\(. \end{remark} \begin{remark}\label{rem:mistake} The proof of (which is a version with\]of Lemma \ref{lem.partitions} above) contains an inaccuracy, though the lemma as stated is correct. Namely, in we write that if there exists\)i\(such that\)\_i\(is of type\)\_l_i\(where\)l_i \(is {odd,} then we partition\)S_i\(for {\em one} such\)i\(into three non-empty subsets\)S\_i,1\(,\)S\_i,2\(and\)S\_i,3\(of odd cardinalities, and we partition all the other\)S_i\(as in. However, this partitioning of the sets\)S_i\(into three subsets does not satisfy for {\em other}\)i\(such that\)\_i\(is of type\)\_l_i\(with {odd}\)l_i\(. This inaccuracy can be easily corrected: we should partition\)S_i\(for {\em each}\)i\(such that\)\_i\(is of type\)\_l_i\(with {odd}\)l_i\(into three non-empty subsets of odd cardinalities. \end{remark} \section{More non-quasi-permutation lattices} \label{sec:3} In this section we construct another family of non-quasi-permutation lattices. \begin{subsec}\label{subsec:qp-An-nu} For\)i=1,...,r\(let\)Q_i=Å\_n_i-1\(and\)P_i=\_n_i\(denote the root lattice and the weight lattice of\)\_n_i\(, respectively, and let\)W_i=\_n_i\(denote the corresponding Weyl group (the symmetric group on\)n_i\(letters) acting on\)P_i\(and\)Q_i\(. Set\)F_i=P_i/Q_i\(, then\)W_i\(acts trivially on\)F_i\(. Set\[Q=\bigoplus_{i=1}^r Q_i,\quad P=\bigoplus_{i=1}^r P_i,\quad W=\prod_{i=1}^r W_i,\]then\)QP\(and the Weyl group\)W\(acts on\)Q\(and\)P\(. Set\[F=P/Q=\bigoplus_{i=1}^r F_i,\]then\)W\(acts trivially on\)F\(. \sms We regard\)Q_i=Å\_n_i-1\(and\)P_i=\_n_i\(as the lattices described in Bourbaki. Then we have an isomorphism\)F_i/n_i\(. Note that for each\)`<!-- -->`{=html}1ir\(, the set\){\_,i \| 1n_i-1}\(is a\[-basis of\)Q_i\(. \sms Set\)c=(n_1,...,n_r)\(; we assume that\)c\>1\(. Let\)d\>1\(be a divisor of\)c\(. For each\)i=1,...,r\(, let\)\_i\(be such that\)`<!-- -->`{=html}1_i\<d\(,\)(\_i,d)=1\(, and assume that\)\_1=1\(. We write\)=(\_i)\_i=1\^r\^r\(. Let\]denote the image of\[in\)(/d)\^r\(. Let\)S\_(/d)\^r\_i=1\^r /n_i=F\(denote the cyclic subgroup of order\)d\(generated by\]. Let\)L\_\(denote the preimage of\)S_F\(in\)P\(under the canonical epimorphism\)PF\(, then\)QL_P\(. \end{subsec} \begin{proposition}\label{prop:latticeL} Let\)W\(and the\)W\(-lattice\)L\_\(be as in Subsection \ref{subsec:qp-An-nu}. In the case\)d=2\^s\(we assume that\)n_i\>4\(. Then\)L\_\(is not quasi-permutation. \end{proposition} This proposition follows from Lemmas \ref{lem:equivalent} and \ref{lem:not-qp} below. \begin{lemma}\label{lem:equivalent} Let\)p\| d\(be a prime. Then for any subgroup\)W\(isomorphic to\)(/p)\^m\(for some natural\)m\(, the\[-lattices\)L\_\(and\)L\_:=L\_(1,...,1)\(are equivalent for any\)=(\_1,...,\_r)\(as above (in particular, we assume that\)\_1=1\(). \end{lemma} Note that this lemma is trivial when\)d=2\(. \begin{subsec} We compute the lattice\)L\_\(explicitly. First let\)r=1\(. We have\)Q=Q_1\(,\)P=P_1\(. Then\)P_1\(is generated by\)Q_1\(and an element\)P_1\(whose image in\)P_1/Q_1\(is of order\)n_1\(. We may take\]\omega=\frac{1}{n_1}[(n_1-1)\alpha_1+(n_1-2)\alpha_2+\dots +2\alpha_{n_1-2}+\alpha_{n_1-1}],\[where\)\_1,...,\_n_1-1\(are the simple roots, see. There exists exactly one intermediate lattice\)L\(between\)Q_1\(and\)P_1\(such that\)\[L:Q_1\]=d\(, and it is generated by\)Q_1\(and the element\]w=\frac{n_1}{d}\omega=\frac{1}{d}[(n_1-1)\alpha_1+(n_1-2)\alpha_2+\dots +2\alpha_{n_1-2}+\alpha_{n_1-1}].\[Now for any natural\)r\(, the lattice\)L\_\(is generated by\)Q\(and the element\]w_\nub=\frac{1}{d}\sum_{i=1}^r\nu_i[(n_i-1)\alpha_{1,i}+(n_i-2)\alpha_{2,i}+\dots +2\alpha_{n_i-2,i}+\alpha_{n_i-1,i}].\[In particular,\)L\_\(is generated by\)Q\(and\]w_\one=\frac{1}{d}\sum_{i=1}^r[(n_i-1)\alpha_{1,i}+(n_i-2)\alpha_{2,i}+\dots +2\alpha_{n_i-2,i}+\alpha_{n_i-1,i}].\[\end{subsec} \begin{subsec} {\em Proof of Lemma \ref{lem:equivalent}.} Recall that\)L\_=Q, w\_\(with\]Q=\langle\alpha_{\vk,i}\rangle, \quad\text{where}\quad i=1,\dots, r,\ \vk=1,\dots,n_i-1.\[Set\)Q\_=\_i\_,i\(. Denote by\)\_\(the endomorphism of\)Q\(that acts on\)Q_i\(by multiplication by\)\_i\(. We have\)Q\_=Q, Q\_=\_Q\_, w\_=\_w\_\(. Consider\]\T_\nub L_\one=\langle Q_\nub,w_\nub\rangle.\[Clearly the\)W\(-lattices\)L\_\(and\)\_L\_\(are isomorphic. We have an embedding of\)W\(-lattices\)QL\_\(, in particular, an embedding\)QL\_\(, which induces an embedding\)\_Q_L\_\(. Set\)M\_=L\_/\_L\_\(, then we obtain a homomorphism of\)W\(-modules\)Q/\_QM\_\(, which is an isomorphism by Lemma \ref{lem:quotient} below. \sms Now let\)p\|d\(be a prime. Let\)W\(be a subgroup isomorphic to\)(/p)\^m\(for some natural\)m\(. As in , we use Roiter's version of Schanuel's lemma. We have exact sequences of\]-modules \begin{gather*} 0\to {\T_\nub L_\one}\to L_\nub\to M_\nub\to 0,\\ 0\to Q\labelto{\T_\nub} Q\to M_\nub\to 0. \end{gather*} Since all\)\_i\(are prime to\)p\(, we have\)\|\|M\_=p\^m M\_=M\_\(, and by the morphisms of\[-modules\)L_M\_\(and\)QM\_\(are projective in the sense of. Now by there exists an isomorphism of\]-lattices\)L_QQ\(. Since\)Q\(is a quasi-permutation\)W\(-lattice, it is a quasi-permutation\[-lattice, and by Lemma \ref{lem:qp-eq} below,\)L\_\~\_L\_\(as\]-lattices. Since\)\_L\_L\_\(, we conclude that\)L\_\~L\_\(. \qed \end{subsec} \begin{lemma}\label{lem:quotient} With the above notation\)L\_/\_L\_Q/\_Q=\_i=2\^r Q_i/\_i Q_i\(. \end{lemma} \begin{proof} We have\)\_L\_=S\_\(, where\)S\_={\_i\_,i}\_i,{w\_}\(. Note that\[dw_\nub=\sum_{i=1}^r \nu_i[(n_i-1)\alpha_{1,i}+(n_i-2)\alpha_{2,i}+\dots +2\alpha_{n_i-2,i}+\alpha_{n_i-1,i}].\]We see that\)dw\_\(is a linear combination with integer coefficients of\)\_i\_,i\(and that\)\_n_1-1,1\(appears in this linear combination with coefficient 1 (because\)\_1=1\(). Set\)B'\_=S\_{\_n_1-1,1}\(, then\)B'\_\_n_1-1,1\(, hence\)B'\_=S\_=\_L\_\(, thus\)B'\_\(is a basis of\)\_L\_\(. Similarly, the set\)B\_:={\_,i}\_i,{w\_}{\_n_1-1,1}\(is a basis of\)L\_\(. Both bases\)B\_\(and\)B'\_\(contain\)\_1,1,...,\_n_1-2,1\(and\)w\_\(. For all\)i=2,...,r\(and all\),...,n_i-1\(, the basis\)B\_\(contains\)\_,i\(, while\)B'\_\(contains\)\_i\_,i\(. We see that the homomorphism of\)W\(-modules\)Q/\_Q = \_i=2\^r Q_i/\_i Q_i L\_/\_L\_\(is an isomorphism. \end{proof} \begin{lemma}\label{lem:qp-eq} Let\[be a finite group,\)A\(and\)A'\(be\]-lattices. If\)AB\~A'B'\(, where\)B\(and\)B'\(are quasi-permutation\[-lattices, then\)A\~A'\(. \end{lemma} \begin{proof} Since\)B\(and\)B'\(are quasi-permutation, by Lemma \ref{lem:quasi-p} they are equivalent to 0, and we have\]A=A\oplus 0\sim A\oplus B\sim A'\oplus B'\sim A'\oplus 0=A'.\[This completes the proof of Lemma \ref{lem:qp-eq} and hence of Lemma \ref{lem:equivalent}. \end{proof} To complete the proof of Proposition \ref{prop:latticeL} it suffices to prove the next lemma. \begin{lemma}\label{lem:not-qp} Let\)p\| d\(be a prime. Then there exists a subgroup\)W\(isomorphic to\)(/p)\^m\(for some natural\)m\(such that the\]-lattice\)L\_:=L\_(1,...,1)\(is not quasi-permutation. \end{lemma} \begin{subsec} Denote by\)U_i\(the space\)\^n_i\(with canonical basis\)\_1,i  ,  \_2,i , ..., \_n_i,i\(\. Denote by\)V_i\(the subspace of codimension 1 in\)U_i\(consisting of vectors with zero sum of the coordinates. The group\)W_i=\_n_i\((the symmetric group) permutes the basis vectors\)\_1,i  ,  \_2,i , ..., \_n_i,i\(and thus acts on\)U_i\(and\)V_i\(. Consider the homomorphism of vector spaces\[\chi_i\colon U_i\to\R,\quad \sum_{\lambda = 1}^{n_i}\beta_{\lambda,i}\ve_{\lambda,i}\mapsto \sum_{\lambda = 1}^{n_i}\beta_{\lambda,i}\]taking a vector to the sum of its coordinates. Clearly this homomorphism is\)W_i\(-equivariant, where\)W_i\(acts trivially on\[. We have short exact sequences\]0\to V_i\to U_i\labelto{\chi_i}\R\to 0.\[Set\)U=\_i=1\^r U_i, V=\_i=1\^r V_i\(. The group\)W=\_i=1\^r W_i\(naturally acts on\)U\(and\)V\(, and we have an exact sequence of\)W\(-spaces \begin{equation}\label{eq:exact1} 0\to V\to U\labelto{\chi}\R^r\to 0, \end{equation} where\)=(\_i)\_i=1,...,r\(and\)W\(acts trivially on\)\^r\(. \sms Set\)n=\_i=1\^r n_i\(. Consider the vector space\):=\^n\(with canonical basis\)\_1,\_2,...,\_n\(. Consider the natural isomorphism\]\varphi\colon U=\bigoplus_i U_i\isoto\Ubar\[that takes\)\_1,1,\_2,1,...,\_n_1,1\(to\)\_1,\_2,...,\_n_1\(, takes\)\_1,2,\_2,2,...,\_n_2,2\(to\)\_n_1+1,\_n_1+2,...,\_n_1+n_2\(, and so on. Let\]denote the subspace of codimension 1 in\[consisting of vectors with zero sum of the coordinates. Sequence \eqref{eq:exact1} induces an exact sequence of\)W\(-spaces \begin{equation}\label{eq-exact0} 0\to \varphi(V)\to \Vbar\labelto{\psi} \R^r\labelto{\Sigma} \R\to 0. \end{equation} Here\)=(\_i)\_i=1,...,r\(, where\)\_i\(takes a vector\)\_j=1\^n \_j \_j\(to\)\_\^n_i \_n_1+...+n\_i-1+\(, and the map\]takes a vector in\)\^r\(to the sum of its coordinates. Note that\)W\(acts trivially on\)\^r\(and\[. \sms We have a lattice\)Q_iV_i\(for each\)i=1,..., r\(, a lattice\)Q=\_i Q_i\_i V_i\(, and a lattice\):=Å\_n-1\(in\]with basis\)\_1-\_2,...,\_n-1-\_n\(. The isomorphism\[induces an embedding of\)Q=\_i Q_i\(into\]. Under this embedding \begin{align*} &\alpha_{1,1}\mapsto \alphabar_1,\ \alpha_{2,1}\mapsto \alphabar_2,\ \dots,\ \alpha_{n_1-1,1}\mapsto\alphabar_{n_1-1},\\ &\alpha_{1,2}\mapsto \alphabar_{n_1+1},\ \alpha_{2,2}\mapsto \alphabar_{n_1+2},\ \dots,\ \alpha_{n_2-1,2}\mapsto\alphabar_{n_1+n_2-1},\\ &\dots\dots\dots\dots\dots\dots\dots\dots\dots\dots\dots\dots\dots\dots\dots\dots\dots\\ &\alpha_{1,r}\mapsto \alphabar_{n_1+n_2+\dots+n_{r-1}+1},\ \dots,\ \alpha_{n_r-1,r}\mapsto\alphabar_{n-1}, \end{align*} while\)\_n_1,\_n_1+n_2, ..., \_n_1+n_2+...+n\_r-1\(are skipped. \end{subsec} \begin{subsec} We write\)L\(for\)L\_\(and\)w\(for\)w\_ Q\(, where\)Q=\_i Q_i\(. Then\[w=\sum_{i=1}^r w_i, \quad w_i=\frac{1}{d}[(n_i-1)\alpha_{1,i}+\dots+\alpha_{n_i-1,i}].\]Recall that\[Q_i=\Z \AA_{n_i-1}=\{(a_j)\in \Z^{n_i}\mid \sum_{j=1}^{n_i} a_j=0\}.\]Set\[\wbar=\frac{1}{d}\sum_{j=1}^{n-1} (n-j)\alphabar_j.\]Set\)\_n(d)=,\(. Note that\)\_n(d)=Q_n(n/d)\(with the notation of. Set\[N=\varphi(Q\otimes_\Z\R)\cap\Lambda_n(d)=\varphi(V)\cap\Lambda_n(d).\]\end{subsec} \begin{lemma}\label{lem:varphi}\)(L)=N\(. \end{lemma} \begin{proof} Write\)j_1=n_1, j_2=n_1+n_2, ..., j\_r-1=n_1+...+n\_r-1\(. Set\)J={1,2,...,n-1}{j_1,j_2,...,j\_r-1}\(. Set\[\mu=\frac{1}{d} \sum_{j\in J} (n-j)\alphabar_j=\wbar-\sum_{i=1}^{r-1} \frac{n-j_i}{d}\alphabar_{j_i}.\]Note that\)d\|n\(and\)d\|j_i\(for all\)i\(, hence the coefficients\)(n-j_i)/d\(are integral, and therefore\)\_n(d)\(. Since also\)(Q\_)\(, we see that\)N\(. \sms Let\)yN\(. Then\[y=b\wbar+\sum_{j=1}^{n-1} a_j\alphabar_j\]where\)b,a_j\(, because\)y_n(d)\(. We see that in the basis\)\_1,...,\_n-1\(of\)\_n(d)\_\(, the element\)y\(contains\)\_j_i\(with coefficient\[b\frac{n-j_i}{d} +a_{j_i}.\]Since\)y( Q\_)\(, this coefficient must be 0:\[b\frac{n-j_i}{d}+ a_{j_i}=0.\]Consider \begin{align*} y-b\mu=y-b\left(\wbar-\sum_{i=1}^{r-1}\frac{n-j_i}{d}\alphabar_{j_i}\right)= &y-b\wbar+\sum_{i=1}^{r-1}\frac{b(n-j_i)}{d}\alphabar_{j_i}\\ =\sum_{j=1}^{n-1} &a_j\alphabar_j+\sum_{i=1}^{r-1}\frac{b(n-j_i)}{d}\alphabar_{j_i}=\sum_{j\in J} a_j\alphabar_j\,, \end{align*} where\)a_j\(. We see that\)y_j (jJ),\(for any\)yN\(, hence\)N_j (jJ),\(. Conversely,\)N\(and\)\_j N\(for\)jJ\(, hence\)\_j (jJ),N\(, thus \begin{equation}\label{eq:N-mu} N=\langle \alphabar_j\ (j\in J),\mu\rangle. \end{equation} \sms Now\[\varphi(w)=\frac{1}{d}\left[\sum_{j=1}^{n_1-1} (n_1-j)\alphabar_j +\sum_{j=1}^{n_2-1} (n_2-j)\alphabar_{n_1+j}+\dots +\sum_{j=1}^{n_r-1} (n_r-j)\alphabar_{j_{r-1}+j}\right]\]while\[\mu=\frac{1}{d}\left[\sum_{j=1}^{n_1-1} (n-j)\alphabar_j +\sum_{j=1}^{n_2-1} (n-n_1-j)\alphabar_{n_1+j}+\dots +\sum_{j=1}^{n_r-1} (n_r-j)\alphabar_{j_{r-1}+j}\right].\]Thus\[\mu=\varphi(w)+\frac{n-n_1}{d}\sum_{j=1}^{n_1-1}\alphabar_j +\frac{n-n_1-n_2}{d}\sum_{j=1}^{n_2-1}\alphabar_{n_1+j}+\dots+\frac{n_r}{d}\sum_{j=1}^{n_r-1}\alphabar_{j_{r-1}+j}\,,\]where the coefficients\[\frac{n-n_1}{d},\quad \frac{n-n_1-n_2}{d},\quad\dots,\quad\frac{n_r}{d}\]are integral. We see that \begin{equation}\label{eq:mu-varphi(w)} \langle\alphabar_j\ (j\in J),\ \mu\rangle=\langle\alphabar_j\ (j\in J),\ \varphi(w)\rangle. \end{equation} From \eqref{eq:N-mu} and \eqref{eq:mu-varphi(w)} we obtain that \[ N=\langle\alphabar_j\, (j\in J),\,\mu\rangle=\langle\alphabar_j\, (j\in J),\, \varphi(w)\rangle=\varphi(L).\qedhere \] \end{proof} \begin{subsec} Now let\)p\|(n_1,...,n_r)\(. Recall that\)W=\_i=1\^r \_n_i\(. Since\)p\|n_i\(for all\)i\(, we can naturally embed\)(\_p)\^n_i/p\(into\)\_n_i\(. We obtain a natural embedding\[\Gamma:=(\Z/p\Z)^{n/p}\into (\SS_p)^{n/p}\into W.\]In order to prove Lemma \ref{lem:not-qp}, it suffices to prove the next Lemma \ref{lem:p-p^2}. Indeed, if\)n\(has an odd prime factor\)p\(, then by Lemma \ref{lem:p-p^2}\)L\(is not quasi-permutation. If\)n=2\^s\(, then we take\)p=2\(. By the assumptions of Proposition \ref{prop:latticeL},\)n\>4=2\^2\(, and again by Lemma \ref{lem:p-p^2}\)L\(is not quasi-permutation. This proves Lemma \ref{lem:not-qp}. \end{subsec} \begin{lemma}\label{lem:p-p^2} If either\)p\(odd or\)n\>p\^2\(, then\)L\(is not quasi-permutation as a\[-lattice. \end{lemma} \begin{proof} By Lemma \ref{lem:varphi} it suffices to show that\)N\(is not quasi-permutation. Since\)N=\_n(d)(V)\(, we have an embedding\]\Lambda_n(d)/N\into \Vbar/\varphi(V).\[By \eqref{eq-exact0}\)/(V)\^r-1\(and\)W\(acts on\)/(V)\(trivially. Thus\)\_n(d)/N\^r-1\(and\)W\(acts on\)\^r-1\(trivially. We have an exact sequence of\)W\(-lattices\]0\to N\to \Lambda_n(d)\to \Z^{r-1}\to 0,\[with trivial action of\)W\(on\)\^r-1\(. We obtain that\)N\~\_n(d)\(as a\)W\(-lattice, and hence, as a\]-lattice. Therefore, it suffices to show that\)\_n(d)=Q_n(n/d)\(is not quasi-permutation as a\[-lattice if either\)p\(is odd or\)n\>p\^2\(. This is done in in the proofs of Propositions 7.4 and 7.8. This completes the proof of Lemma \ref{lem:p-p^2} and hence those of Lemma \ref{lem:not-qp} and Proposition \ref{prop:latticeL}. \end{proof} \section{Quasi-permutation lattices--case \)\AA_{n-1}\(} \label{sec:4} In this section we prove Theorem \ref{thm:product} in the special case when\)G\(is isogenous to a direct product of groups of type\)Å\_n-1\(for\)n\(. \sms We maintain the notation of Subsection \ref{subsec:qp-An-nu}. Let\)L\(be an intermediate lattice between\)Q\(and\)P\(, i.e.,\)QLP\((\,\)L=Q\(are\)L=P\(are possible). Let\)S\(denote the image of\)L\(in\)F\(, then\)L\(is the preimage of\)SF\(in\)P\(. Since\)W\(acts trivially on\)F\(, the subgroup\)SF\(is\)W\(-invariant, and therefore, the sublattice\)LP\(is\)W\(-invariant. \begin{theorem}\label{thm:qp-lattices} With the notation of Subsection \ref{subsec:qp-An-nu} assume that\)n_i\(for all\)i=1,2,...,r\(. Let\)L\(between\)Q\(and\)P\(be an intermediate lattice, and assume that\)LP_i=Q_i\(for all\)i\(such that\)n_i=3\(or\)n_i=4\(. If\)L\(is a quasi-permutation\)W\(-lattice, then\)L=Q\(. \end{theorem} \begin{proof} We prove the theorem by induction on\)r\(. The case\)r=1\(follows from our assumptions if\)n_1=3\(or\)n_1=4\(, and from Proposition \ref{prop:CK,LPR} if\)n_1\> 4\(. \sms We assume that\)r\>1\(and that the assertion is true for\)r-1\(. We prove it for\)r\(. \sms For\)i\(between\)`<!-- -->`{=html}1\(and\)r\(we set\]Q'_i=\bigoplus_{j\neq i} Q_j,\quad P'_i=\bigoplus_{j\neq i} P_j,\quad F'_i=\bigoplus_{j\neq i} F_j,\quad W_i'=\prod_{j\neq i} W_j,\[then\)Q'\_iQ\(,\)P'\_iP\(,\)F'\_iF\(and\)W'\_iW\(. If\)L\(is a quasi-permutation\)W\(-lattice, then by Lemma \ref{lem:2.8}\)LP'\_i\(is a quasi-permutation\)W'\_i\(-lattice, and by the induction hypothesis\)LP'\_i= Q'\_i\(. \sms Now let\)QLP\(, and assume that\)LP'\_i= Q'\_i\(for all\)i=1,..., r\(. We shall show that if\)LQ\(then\)L\(is not a quasi-permutation\)W\(-lattice. This will prove Theorem \ref{thm:qp-lattices}. \sms Assume that\)LQ\(. Set\)S=L/QF\(, then\)S\(. We first show that\)(LP'\_i)/ Q'\_i=SF'\_i\(. Indeed, clearly\)(LP'\_i)/ Q'\_iL/QP'\_i/Q'\_i= SF'\_i\(. Conversely, let\)fSF'\_i\(, then\)f\(can be represented by some\)lL\(and by some\)pP'\_i\(, and\)q:=l-pQ\(. Since\)LQ\(, we see that\)p=l-qLP'\_i\(, hence\)f(LP'\_i)/Q'\_i\(, and therefore\)SF'\_i(LP'\_i)/ Q'\_i\(. Thus\)(LP'\_i)/ Q'\_i=SF'\_i\(. \sms By assumption we have\)LP'\_i= Q'\_i\(, and we obtain that\)SF'\_i=0\(for all\)i=1,..., r\(. Let\)S\_(i)\(denote the image of\)S\(under the projection\)FF_i\(. We have a canonical epimorphism\)p_iSS\_(i)\(with kernel\)SF'\_i\(. Since\)SF'\_i=0\(, we see that\)p_iSS\_(i)\(is an isomorphism. Set\)q_i=p_ip_1\^-1S\_(1)S\_(i)\(, it is an isomorphism. \sms We regard\)Q_i=Å\_n_i-1\(and\)P_i=\_n_i\(as the lattices described in. Then we have an isomorphism\)F_i/n_i\(. Since\)S\_(i)\(is a subgroup of the cyclic group\)F_i/n_i\(and\)SS\_(i)\(, we see that\)S\(is a cyclic group, and we see also that\)\|S\|\(divides\)n_i\(for all\)i\(, hence\)d:=\|S\|\(divides\)c:=(n_1,...,n_r)\(. \sms We describe all subgroups\)S\(of order\)d\(in\)\_i=1\^r /n_i\(such that\)S(\_ji /n_j)=0\(for all\)i\(. The element\)a_i:=n_i/d+n_i\(is a generator of\)S\_(i)F_i=/n_i\(. Set\)b_i=q_i(a_1)\(. Since\)b_i\(is a generator of\)S\_(i)\(, we have\)b_i=\_i a_i\(for some\)\_i(/d)\^\(. Let\)\_i\(be a representative of\)\_i\(such that\)`<!-- -->`{=html}1_i\<d\(, then\)(\_i,d)=1\(. Moreover, since\)q_1=\(, we have\)b_1=a_1\(, hence\)\_1=1\(and\)\_1=1\(. We obtain an element\)=(\_1,...,\_r)\(. With the notation of Subsection \ref{subsec:qp-An-nu} we have\)S=S\_\(and\)L=L\_\(. \sms By Proposition \ref{prop:latticeL}\)L\_\(is not a quasi-permutation\)W\(-lattice. Thus\)L\(is not quasi-permutation, which completes the proof of Theorem \ref{thm:qp-lattices}. \end{proof} \section{Proof of Theorem \ref{thm:product}} \label{sec:5} \begin{lemma}[well-known]\label{lem:split} Let\)P_1\(and\)P_2\(be abelian groups. Set\)P=P_1P_2=P_1P_2\(, and let\)\_1PP_1\(denote the canonical projection. Let\)LP\(be a subgroup. If\)\_1(L)=LP_1\(, then\]L=(L\cap P_1)\oplus (L\cap P_2).\[\end{lemma} \begin{proof} Let\)xL\(. Set\)x_1=\_1(x)\_1(L)\(. Since\)\_1(L)=LP_1\(, we have\)x_1LP_1\(. Set\)x_2=x-x_1\(, then\)x_2LP_2\(. We have\)x=x_1+x_2\(. This completes the proof of Lemma \ref{lem:split}. \end{proof} \begin{subsec}\label{subsec:almost} Let\)I\(be a finite set. For any\)iI\(let\)D_i\(be a connected Dynkin diagram. Let\)D=\_i D_i\((disjoint union). Let\)Q_i\(and\)P_i\(be the root and weight lattices of\)D_i\(, respectively, and\)W_i\(be the Weyl group of\)D_i\(. Set\]Q=\bigoplus_{i\in I} Q_i,\quad P=\bigoplus_{i\in I} P_i, \quad W=\prod_{i\in I} W_i.\[\end{subsec} \begin{subsec} We construct certain quasi-permutation lattices\)L\(such that\)QLP\(. \sms Let\){  {i_1,j_1},...,{i_s,j_s}  }\(be a set of non-ordered pairs in\)I\(such that\)D\_i_l\(and\)D\_j_l\(for all\)l=1,...,s\(are of type\)\_1=Å_1\(and all the indices\)i_1,j_1,...,i_s,j_s\(are distinct. Fix such an\)l\(. We write\){i,j}\(for\){i_l,j_l}\(and we set\)D\_i,j:=D\_iD\_j\(,\)Q\_i,j:=Q\_iQ\_j\(,\)P\_i,j:=P\_iP\_j\(. We regard\)D\_i,j\(as a Dynkin diagram of type\)\_2\(, and we denote by\)M\_i,j\(the intermediate lattice between\)Q\_i,j\(and\)P\_i,j\(isomorphic to\)(\_4)\(, the character lattice of the group\)\_4\(; see Section \ref{sec:1}, after Lemma \ref{lem:2.8}. Let\)f_i\(be a generator of the lattice\)Q_i\(of rank 1, and let\)f_j\(be a generator of\)Q_j\(, then\)P_i=f_i\(and\)P_j=f_j\(. Set\)e_1\^(l)=(f_i+f_j)\(, \ \)e_2\^(l)=(f_i-f_j)\(, then\){e_1\^(l),e_2\^(l)}\(is a basis of\)M\_i,j\(\,, and \begin{equation}\label{eq:M} M_{i,j}=\left\langle Q_{i,j},e_1^{(l)}\right\rangle,\qquad P_{i,j}=\left\langle M_{i,j},\half(e_1^{(l)}+e_2^{(l)})\,\right\rangle. \end{equation} We have\)M\_i,jP_i=Q_i, M\_i,jP_j=Q_j\(, and\)\[M\_i,j:Q\_i,j\]=2\(. Concerning the Weyl group, we have\]W(D_{i,j})=W(D_i)\times W(D_j)=W(\DD_2)=\SS_2\times\{\pm 1\},\[where the symmetric group\)\_2\(permutes the basis vectors\)e_1\^(l)\(and\)e_2\^(l)\(of\)M\_i,j\(\,, while the group\){}\(acts on\)M\_i,j\(by multiplication by scalars. We say that\)M\_i,j\(is an {\em indecomposable quasi-permutation lattice} (it corresponds to the semisimple Cayley group\)\_4\(which does not decompose into a direct product of its normal subgroups). \sms Set\)I'=I\_l=1\^s {i_l,j_l}\(. For\)iI'\(let\)M_i\(be any quasi-permutation intermediate lattice between\)Q_i\(and\)P_i\((such an intermediate lattice exists if and only if\)D_i\(is of one of the types\)Å_n, \_n, \_n, \_n, \_2\(, see Proposition \ref{prop:CK,LPR}). We say that\)M_i\(is a {\em simple quasi-permutation lattice} (it corresponds to a stably Cayley simple group). We set \begin{equation}\label{eq:*} L= \bigoplus_{l=1}^s M_{i_l,j_l}\, \oplus\, \bigoplus_{i\in I'} M_i. \end{equation} We say that a lattice\)L\(as in \eqref{eq:*} is a {\em direct sum of indecomposable quasi-permutation lattices and simple quasi-permutation lattices}. Clearly\)L\(is a quasi-permutation\)W\(-lattice. \end{subsec} \begin{theorem}\label{thm:almost} Let\)D, Q, P, W\(be as in Subsection \ref{subsec:almost}. Let\)L\(be an intermediate lattice between\)Q\(and\)P\(, i.e.,\)QLP\((where\)L=Q\(and\)L=P\(are possible). If\)L\(is a quasi-permutation\)W\(-lattice, then\)L\(is as in \eqref{eq:*}. Namely, then\)L\(is a direct sum of indecomposable quasi-permutation lattices\)M\_i,j\(for some set of pairs\){  {i_1,j_1},...,{i_s,j_s}  }\(and some family of simple quasi-permutation intermediate lattices\)M_i\(between\)Q_i\(and\)P_i\(for\)iI'\(. \end{theorem} \begin{remark}\label{rem:pairs} The set of pairs\){  {i_1,j_1},...,{i_s,j_s}  }\(in Theorem \ref{thm:almost} is uniquely determined by\)L\(. Namely, a pair\){i,j}\(belongs to this set if and only if the Dynkin diagrams\)D_i\(and\)D_j\(are of type\)\_1=Å_1\(and\]L\cap P_i= Q_i\,,\quad L\cap P_j= Q_j\,, \quad \text{while } L\cap (P_i\oplus P_j)\neq Q_i\oplus Q_j\.\[\end{remark} \begin{proof}[Proof of Theorem \ref{thm:almost}] We prove the theorem by induction on\)m=\|I\|\(, where\)I\(is as in Subsection \ref{subsec:almost}. The case\)m=1\(is trivial. \sms We assume that\)m\(and that the theorem is proved for all\)m'\<m\(. We prove it for\)m\(. First we consider three special cases. \sms {\em Split case}. Assume that for some subset\)AI\(,\)AI\(,\)A\(, we have\)\_A(L)=LP_A\(, where\)P_A=\_iAP_i\(and\)\_APP_A\(is the canonical projection. Then by Lemma \ref{lem:split} we have\)L=(LP_A)(LP\_A')\(, where\)A'=IA\(. By Lemma \ref{lem:2.8}\)LP_A\(is a quasi-permutation\)W_A\(-lattice, where\)W_A=\_iA W_i\(. By the induction hypothesis the lattice\)LP_A\(is a direct sum of indecomposable quasi-permutation lattices and simple quasi-permutation lattices. Similarly,\)LP\_A'\(is such a direct sum. We conclude that\)L=(LP_A)(LP\_A')\(is such a direct sum, and we are done. \sms {\em \)\AA_{n-1}\(-case}. Assume that all\)D_i\(are of type\)Å\_n_i-1\(, where\)n_i\((so\)Å_1\(is not permitted). We assume also that when\)n_i=3\(and when\)n_i=4\((that is, for\)Å_2\(and for\)Å_3=\_3\() we have\)LP_i=Q_i\((for\)n_i \> 4\(this is automatic because\)LP_i\(is a quasi-permutation\)W_i\(-lattice, see Proposition \ref{prop:CK,LPR}). In this case by Theorem \ref{thm:qp-lattices} we have\)L=Q=Q_i\(, hence\)L\(is a direct sum of simple quasi-permutation lattices, and we are done. \sms {\em \)\AA_1\(-case}. Assume that all\)D_i\(are of type\)Å_1\(. Then by the lattice\)L\(is a direct sum of indecomposable quasi-permutation lattices and simple quasi-permutation lattices, and we are done. \sms Now we shall show that these three special cases exhaust all the quasi-permutation lattices. In other words, we shall show that if\)QLP\(and\)L\(is not as in one of these three cases, then\)L\(is not quasi-permutation. This will complete the proof of the theorem. \sms For the sake of contradiction, let us assume that\)QLP\(, that\)L\(is not in one of the three special cases above, and that\)L\(is a {quasi-permutation}\)W\(-lattice. We shall show in three steps that\)L\(is as in Proposition \ref{prop:one-vector}. By Proposition \ref{prop:one-vector},\)L\(is not quasi--permutation, which contradicts our assumptions. This contradiction will prove the theorem. \sms {\em Step 1.} For\)iI\(consider the intersection\)LP_i\(, it is a quasi-permutation\)W_i\(-lattice (by Lemma \ref{lem:2.8}), hence\)D_i\(is of one of the types\)Å\_n-1\(,\)\_n\(,\)\_n\(,\)\_n\(,\)\_2\((by Proposition \ref{prop:CK,LPR}). Note that\)\_i(L)LP_i\((otherwise we are in the split case). \sms Now assume that for some\)iI\(, the Dynkin diagram\)D_i\(is of type\)\_2\(or\)\_n\(for some\)n\(, or\)D_i\(is of type\)Å_2\(and\)LP_iQ_i\(. Then\)LP_i\(is a quasi-permutation\)W_i\(-lattice (by Lemma \ref{lem:2.8}), hence\)LP_i=P_i\((by Proposition \ref{prop:CK,LPR}). Since\)P_i\_i(L)LP_i\(, we obtain that\)\_i(L)=LP_i\(, which is impossible. Thus no\)D_i\(can be of type\)\_2\(or\)\_n\(,\)n\(, and if\)D_i\(is of type\)Å_2\(for some\)i\(, then\)LP_i=Q_i\(. \sms Thus all\)D_i\(are of types\)Å\_n-1, \_n\(or\)\_n\(, and if\)D_i\(is of type\)Å_2\(for some\)iI\(, then\)LP_i=Q_i\(. Since\)L\(is not as in the\)Å\_n-1\(-case, we may assume that one of the\)D_i\(, say\)D_1\(, is of type\)\_n\(for some\)n\((\)\_1=Å_1\(is permitted), or of type\)\_n\(for some\)n\(, or of type\)\_3\(with\)LP_1Q_1\(. Indeed, otherwise {\em all}\)D_i\(are of type\)Å\_n_i-1\(for\)n_i\(, and in the cases\)Å_2\((\)n_i=3\() and\)Å_3\((\)n_i=4\() we have\)LP_i=Q_i\(, i.e., we are in the\)Å\_n-1\(-case, which contradicts our assumptions. \sms {\em Step 2.} In this step, using the Dynkin diagram\)D_1\(of type\)\_n\(or\)\_n\(from the previous step, we construct a quasi-permutation sublattice\)L'L\(of index 2 such that\)L'\(is as in \eqref{eq:*}. First we consider the cases\)\_n\(and\)\_n\(separately. \sms Assume that\)D_1\(is of type\)\_n\(for some\)n\((\)\_1=Å_1\(is permitted). We have\)\[P_1:Q_1\]=2\(. Since\)P_1\_1(L)LP_1Q_1\(, we see that\)\_1(L)=P_1\(and\)LP_1= Q_1\(. Set\)M_1=Q_1\(. We have\)\_1(L)=P_1\(,\)LP_1=M_1\(, and\)\[P_1:M_1\]=2\(. \sms Now assume that\)D_1\(is of type\)\_n\(for some\)n\(, or of type\)\_3\(with\)LP_1Q_1\(. Set\)M_1=LP_1\(, then\)M_1\(is a quasi-permutation\)W_1\(-lattice by Lemma \ref{lem:2.8}, and it follows from Proposition \ref{prop:CK,LPR} that\)(W_1,M_1)(\_2n)\(, where\)(\_2n)\(denotes the character lattice of\)\_2n\(; see Section \ref{sec:1}, after Lemma \ref{lem:2.8}. It follows that\)\[M_1:Q_1\]=2\(and\)\[P_1:M_1\]=2\(. Since\)P_1\_1(L)LP_1= M_1\(, we see that\)\_1(L)=P_1\(. Again we have\)\_1(L)=P_1\(,\)LP_1=M_1\(, and\)\[P_1:M_1\]=2\(. \sms Now we consider together the cases when\)D_1\(is of type\)\_n\(for some\)n\(and when\)D_1\(is of type\)\_n\(for some\)n\(, where in the case\)\_3\(we have\)LP_1Q_1\(. Set\]L':=\ker[L\labelto{\pi_1} P_1\to P_1/M_1].\[Since\)\_1(L)=P_1\(, and\)\[P_1:M_1\]=2\(, we have\)\[L:L'\]=2\(. Clearly we have\)\_1(L')=M_1\(. Set\]L^\dagger_1:=\ker[\pi_1\colon L\to P_1]=L\cap P'_1,\[where\)P'\_1=\_iP_i\(. Since\)L\(is a quasi-permutation\)W\(-lattice, by Lemma \ref{lem:2.8} the lattice\)L_1\^\(is a quasi-permutation\)W_1'\(-lattice, where\)W'\_1=\_iW_i\(. By the induction hypothesis,\)L_1\^\(is a direct sum of indecomposable quasi-permutation lattices and simple quasi-permutation lattices as in \eqref{eq:*}. Since\)M_1=LP_1\(, we have\)M_1L'P_1\(, and\)L'P_1LP_1=M_1\(, hence\)L'P_1=M_1=\_1(L')\(, and by Lemma \ref{lem:split} we have\)L'=M_1L\^\_1\(. Since\)M_1\(is a simple quasi-permutation lattice, we conclude that\)L'\(is a direct sum of indecomposable quasi-permutation lattices and simple quasi-permutation lattices as in \eqref{eq:*}, and\)\[L:L'\]=2\(. \sms {\em Step 3.} In this step we show that\)L\(is as in Proposition \ref{prop:one-vector}. We write \begin{equation*}\label{eq:sum-L'} L'= \bigoplus_{l=1}^s (L'\cap P_{i_l,j_l}) \, \oplus\, \bigoplus_{i\in I'} (L'\cap P_i) , \end{equation*} where\)P\_i_l,j_l=P\_i_lP\_j_l\(, the Dynkin diagrams\)D\_i_l\(and\)D\_j_l\(are of type\)Å_1=\_1\(, and\)L'P\_i_l,j_l=M\_i_l,j_l\(as in \eqref{eq:M}. For any\)iI'\(, we have\)\[\_i(L):\_i(L')\]\(, because\)\[L:L'\]=2\(. Furthermore, for\)iI'\(we have\]\pi_i(L')=L'\cap P_i\subset L\cap P_i\subsetneq \pi_i(L),\[hence\)\[\_i(L): (LP_i)\]=2\(and\)L'P_i=LP_i\(. Similarly, for any\)l=1,..., s\(, if we write\)i=i_l, j=j_l\(, then we have\]M_{i,j}=L'\cap P_{i,j}\subset L\cap P_{i,j}\subsetneq \pi_{i,j}(L)\subset P_{i,j},\qquad [P_{i,j}:M_{i,j}]=2,\[whence\)\_i,j(L)=P\_i,j\(,\)LP\_i,j=M\_i,j\(, and therefore\)\[\_i,j(L):(LP\_i,j)\]=\(and\)L'P\_i,j=M\_i,j=LP\_i,j\(. \sms We view the Dynkin diagram\)D\_i_lD\_j_l\(of type\)Å_1Å_1\(corresponding to the pair\){i_l,j_l}\((\)l=1,...,s\() as a Dynkin diagram of type\)\_2\(. Thus we view\)L'\(as a direct sum of indecomposable quasi-permutation lattices and simple quasi-permutation lattices corresponding to Dynkin diagrams of type\)\_n\(,\)\_n\(and\)Å\_n\(. \sms We wish to show that\)L\(is as in Proposition \ref{prop:one-vector}. We change our notation in order to make it closer to that of Proposition \ref{prop:one-vector}. \sms As in Subsection \ref{subsec:one-vector}, we now write\)D_i\(for Dynkin diagrams of types\)\_l_i\(and\)\_l_i\(only, appearing in\)L'\(, where\)\_1=Å_1\(,\)\_2=\_2\(,\)\_2=Å_1Å_1\(and\)\_3=Å_3\(are permitted, but for\)\_l_i\(with\)l_i=2,3\(we require that\]L\cap P_i=M_i:=\X(\SO_{2l_i}).\[We write\)L'\_i:=LP_i=L'P_i\(. We have\)\[\_i(L):L'\_i\]=2\(, hence\)\[P_i:L'\_i\]\(. If\)D_i\(is of type\)\_l_i\(, then\)\[P_i:L'\_i\]=2\(. If\)D_i\(is of type\)\_l_i\(, then\)L'\_i=LP_iQ_i\(, for\)\_2\(and\)\_3\(by our assumption and for\)\_l_i\(with\)l_i\(because\)LP_i\(is a quasi-permutation\)W_i\(-lattice (see Proposition \ref{prop:CK,LPR}); again we have\)\[P_i:L'\_i\]=2\(. We see that for all\)i\(we have\)\[P_i:L'\_i\]=2\(,\)\_i(L)=P_i\(, and the lattice\)L'\_i=M_i\(is as in Subsection \ref{subsec:one-vector}. We realize the root system\)R(D_i)\(of type\)\_l_i\(or\)\_l_i\(in the standard way (cf. ) in the space\)V_i:=\^l_i\(with basis\)(e_s)\_sS_i\(, then\)L'\_i\(is the lattice generated by the basis vectors\)(e_s)\_sS_i\(of\)V_i\(, and we have\)P_i=L'\_i, x_i\(, where\]x_i=\sum_{s\in S_i} e_s\in L'_i\.\[In particular, when\)D_i\(is of type\)\_2\(we have\)x_i=e_1\^(l)+e_2\^(l)\(with the notation of formula \eqref{eq:M}. \sms As in Subsection \ref{subsec:one-vector}, we write\)\_\(for Dynkin diagrams of type\)Å\_n\_'-1\(appearing in\)L'\(, where\)n\_'\(and for\)Å_3=\_3\(we require that\)LP\_=Q\_\(. We write\)L'\_:=LP\_=L'P\_\(. Then\)L'\_=Q\_\(for all\], for\)Å_2\(by Step 1, for\)Å_3\(by our assumption, and for other\)Å\_n\_'-1\(because\)L'\_\(is a quasi-permutation\)W\_\(-lattice; see Proposition \ref{prop:CK,LPR}. We have\)\_(L)LP\_= L'\_\(and\)\[\_(L): L'\_\]=\[\_(L): \_(L')\]\((because\)\[L:L'\]=2\(). It follows that\)\[\_(L):L'\_\]=2\(, i.e.,\)\[\_(L):Q\_\]=2\(. We know that\)P\_/Q\_\(is a cyclic group of order\)n'\_\(. Since it has a subgroup\)\_(L)/Q\_\(of order 2, we conclude that\)n'\_\(is even,\)n'\_=2n\_\((where\)`<!-- -->`{=html}2n\_\(), and\)\_(L)/Q\_\(is the unique subgroup of order 2 of the cyclic group\)P\_/Q\_\(of order\)`<!-- -->`{=html}2n\_\(. As in Subsection \ref{subsec:one-vector}, we realize the root system\)\_\(of type\)Å\_2n\_\(in the standard way (cf. ) in the subspace\)V\_\(of vectors with zero sum of the coordinates in the space\)\^2n\_\(with basis\)\_,1,..., \_,2n\_\(. We set\[\]then\) (cf.  ), hence \(\pi_\iota(L)=\langle L'_\iota,\half \sms Now we set\[v=\half\sum_{i\in I} x_i+\half\sum_{\iota=1}^\mu\]We claim that\[L=\langle L',v\rangle.\]\sms \noindent {\em Proof of the claim.} Let\)wLL'\(, then\)L=L',w\(, because\)\[L:L'\]=2\(. Set\)z_i=x_i-\_i(w)\(, then\)z_iL'\_iL'\(, because\)x_i,\_i(w)\_i(L)L'\_i\(. Similarly, we set\)\_=We see that \[v=w+\sum_i z_i+\sum_\iota\zeta_\iota,\] where \(\sum_i z_i+\sum_\iota\zeta_\iota\in L'\), and the claim follows. 0◻It follows from the claim that \(L\) is as in Proposition [\[prop:one-vector\]](#prop:one-vector){reference-type="ref" reference="prop:one-vector"} (we use the assumption that we are not in the \(\AA_1\)-case). Now by Proposition [\[prop:one-vector\]](#prop:one-vector){reference-type="ref" reference="prop:one-vector"} \(L\) is not quasi-invertible, hence not quasi-permutation, which contradicts our assumptions. This contradiction proves Theorem [\[thm:almost\]](#thm:almost){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:almost"}. ◻ # Proof of Theorem [\[thm:product-non-closed\]](#thm:product-non-closed){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:product-non-closed"} {#sec:6} In this section we deduce Theorem [\[thm:product-non-closed\]](#thm:product-non-closed){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:product-non-closed"} from Theorem [\[thm:product\]](#thm:product){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:product"}. Let \(G\) be a stably Cayley semisimple \(k\)-group. Then \(\Gbar :=G\times_k \kbar\) is stably Cayley over an algebraic closure \(\kbar\) of \(k\). By Theorem [\[thm:product\]](#thm:product){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:product"}, \(G_\kbar=\prod_{j\in J} G_{j,\kbar}\) for some finite index set \(J\), where each \(G_{j,\kbar}\) is either a stably Cayley simple group or is isomorphic to \(\gSO_{4,\kbar}\). (Recall that \(\gSO_{4,\kbar}\) is stably Cayley and semisimple, but is not simple.) Here we write \(G_{j,\kbar}\) for the factors in order to emphasize that they are defined over \(\kbar\). By Remark [\[rem:pairs\]](#rem:pairs){reference-type="ref" reference="rem:pairs"} the collection of direct factors \(G_{j,\kbar}\) is determined uniquely by \(\Gbar\). The Galois group \(\Gal(\kbar/k)\) acts on \(G_\kbar\), hence on \(J\). Let \(\Omega\) denote the set of orbits of \(\Gal(\kbar/k)\) in \(J\). For \(\omega\in\Omega\) set \(G^\omega_\kbar=\prod_{j\in\omega} G_{j,\kbar}\) , then \(\Gbar=\prod_{\omega\in \Omega} G^\omega_\kbar\). Each \(G^\omega_\kbar\) is \(\Gal(\kbar/k)\)-invariant, hence it defines a \(k\)-form \(G^\omega_k\) of \(G^\omega_\kbar\). We have \(G=\prod_{\omega\in \Omega} G^\omega_k\). For each \(\omega\in\Omega\) choose \(j=j_\omega\in\omega\). Let \(l_j/k\) denote the Galois extension in \(\kbar\) corresponding to the stabilizer of \(j\) in \(\Gal(\kbar/k)\). The subgroup \(G_{j,\kbar}\) is \(\Gal(\kbar/l_j)\)-invariant, hence it comes from an \(l_j\)-form \(G_{j,l_j}\). By the definition of Weil's restriction of scalars (see e.g. ) \(G^\omega_k\cong R_{l_j/k} G_{j,l_j}\), hence \(G\cong\prod_{\omega\in \Omega} R_{l_j/k} G_{j,l_j}\). Each \(G_{j,l_j}\) is either absolutely simple or an \(l_j\)-form of \(\gSO_4\). We complete the proof using an argument from. We show that \(G_{j,l_j}\) is a direct factor of \(G_{l_j}:=G\times_k l_j\). It is clear from the definition that \(G_{j,\kbar}\) is a direct factor of \(G_\kbar\) with complement \(G'_\kbar=\prod_{i\in J\smallsetminus \{j\} } G_{i,\kbar}\). Then \(G'_\kbar\) is \(\Gal(\kbar/l_j)\)-invariant, hence it comes from some \(l_j\)-group \(G'_{l_j}\). We have \(G_{l_j}=G_{j,l_j}\times_{l_j} G'_{l_j}\), hence \(G_{j,l_j}\) is a direct factor of \(G_{l_j}\). Recall that \(G_{j,l_j}\) is either a form of \(\gSO_4\) or absolutely simple. If it is a form of \(\gSO_4\), then clearly it is stably Cayley over \(l_j\). It remains to show that if \(G_{j,l_j}\) is absolutely simple, then \(G_{j,l_j}\) is stably Cayley over \(l_j\). The group \(G_\kbar\) is stably Cayley over \(\kbar\). Since \(G_{j,\kbar}\) is a direct factor of the stably Cayley \(\kbar\)-group \(G_\kbar\) over the algebraically closed field \(\kbar\), by \(G_{j,\kbar}\) is stably Cayley over \(\kbar\). Comparing and , we see that \(G_{j,l_j}\) is either stably Cayley over \(l_j\) (in which case we are done) or an outer form of \(\gPGL_{2n}\) for some \(n\ge 2\). Thus assume by way of contradiction that \(G_{j,l_j}\) is an outer form of \(\gPGL_{2n}\) for some \(n \ge 2\). Then by the character lattice of \(G_{j,l_j}\) is not quasi-invertible, and by the group \(G_{j,l_j}\) cannot be a direct factor of a stably Cayley \(l_j\)-group. This contradicts the fact that \(G_{j,l_j}\) is a direct factor of the stably Cayley \(l_j\)-group \(G_{l_j}\). We conclude that \(G_{j,l_j}\) cannot be an outer form of \(\gPGL_{2n}\) for any \(n \ge 2\). Thus \(G_{j,l_j}\) is stably Cayley over \(l_j\), as desired. 0◻

{'timestamp': '2014-09-22T02:01:00', 'yymm': '1401', 'arxiv_id': '1401.5774', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5774'}

# Introduction Quantum computing promises exponential speed-up for a number of relevant computational problems. Building a scalable and reliable quantum computer is one of the grand challenges of modern science. While small-scale quantum computers are routinely being fabricated and operated in the laboratory , they can only serve as feasibility studies, and fundamental breakthroughs will be required before a truly practical quantum computer can be built. As the size of computers within the reach of state-of-the-art technologies increases, the focus of interest shifts from their basic physical principles to structured design methodologies that will allow to realise large-scale systems. A given technology is suited for construction of general-purpose quantum computers if it supports a direct realisation of a *universal quantum gate set* which can implement or approximate arbitrary functions. Moreover, today's quantum systems exhibit high error rates and require effective *quantum error-correcting codes* (QECC). Consequently, building a practical quantum computer requires an universal gate set which can be implemented in an error-corrected manner. In this paper, we consider a class of quantum circuits based on an universal gate set that consists of just two types of operations: injection of specific quantum states into the circuit and the controlled-not (CNOT) operation. Using the technique of *quantum teleportation*, state injections are mapped to *rotational gates* that together with the CNOT operation provide universality. The advantage of this gate set is that it can be seamlessly integrated into very advanced QECC schemes, allowing for scalable, large-scale information processing. However, as quantum teleportation is inherently probabilistic the direction of qubit rotations is random. This randomness can be corrected via a technique known as *Pauli tracking*. Pauli tracking operates by constructing a classical record of each teleportation result and reinterprets later results during the computation. This tracking means that we do not need to perform active quantum corrections because of the probabilistic nature of teleportation operations. This technique is well known in the quantum information community and routinely ignored (referred to as working in the *Pauli frame*). However, to our knowledge, no details on the algorithm necessary to perform this tracking have been presented. The contributions of this paper are as follows. First, we present teleportation-based quantum computing in a generic and algorithmic way accessible to the design community. There are many types of corrections that are combined to define the Pauli frame of a quantum computation. The two most important arise from teleportation operations when performing arbitrary rotations and the second arises from QEC decoding operations. Without loss of generality we will focus on the first. By doing this, we completely detach our description from a particular type of QECC; in fact, an arbitrary QECC can be applied on top of the basic scheme with a minor adjustment to the algorithm. Second, we introduce a new algorithm for *Pauli tracking*. This algorithm allows us to postpone corrections until the end of computation where we adjust the output of the computation based on the current state of the Pauli frame. The algorithm is completely classical and can be implemented in software and run on the control computer rather than on the quantum hardware. We formalise the algorithm and prove its correctness. Experimental results show that Pauli tracking is efficient. The paper is organised as follows: In section [2](#sec:Quant){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:Quant"} we introduce the basics of quantum computation. Section [3](#sec:ft){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:ft"} details the compatible gate sets for fault-tolerant, error-corrected quantum computation and section [4](#sec:teleport){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:teleport"} introduces teleportation-based quantum gates. Finally, section [5](#sec:corr){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:corr"} illustrates the Pauli tracking algorithm and section [6](#sec:sims){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:sims"} presents several simulation results. # Quantum Computing {#sec:Quant} Quantum circuits represent and manipulate information in *qubits* (quantum bits). While classical bits assume either logic value 0 or 1, qubits may be in *superposition* of these two values. A single qubit has a *quantum state* \(\ket{\psi}= (\alpha_0, \alpha_1)^T = \alpha_0\ket{0} + \alpha_1\ket{1}\). Here, \(\ket0 = (1, 0)^T\) and \(\ket1 = (0, 1)^T\) are quantum analogons of classical logic values 0 and 1, respectively. \(\alpha_0\) and \(\alpha_1\) are complex number called *amplitudes* with \(|\alpha_0|^2 + |\alpha_1|^2 = 1\). \(\ket0\) and \(\ket1\) are orthonormal vectors and form a basis of \(\mathbb{C}^2\). A state \((\alpha_0, \alpha_1)^T\) may be modified by applying single-qubit *quantum gates*. Each quantum gate corresponds to a complex unitary matrix, and gate function is given by multiplying that matrix with the quantum state. Two single-qubit gates that are highly relevant in the context of this paper are the \(X\) and the \(Z\) gate with the following matrices: \[\begin{aligned} X = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix} && Z = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 &-1 \end{pmatrix} \end{aligned}\] The application of \(X\) to a state results in a *bit flip*: \(X(\alpha_0, \alpha_1)^T = (\alpha_1, \alpha_0)^T\); \(\ket0\) is mapped to \(\ket1\), and vice versa. The application of the \(Z\) gate results in a *phase flip*: \(Z(\alpha_0, \alpha_1)^T = (\alpha_0,-\alpha_1)^T\). Bit and phase flips are used for modelling the effects of errors on the quantum state as qubit errors can be decomposed into combination of bit and/or phase flips. Further important single-qubit quantum gates, in the context of a fully error-corrected system, are \[\begin{aligned} H = \frac1{\sqrt2}\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 1 \\ 1 &-1 \end{pmatrix} && P = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & i \end{pmatrix} && T = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & e^{i\frac{\pi}{4}} \end{pmatrix}, \end{aligned}\] where \(T^2 = P\) and \(P^2 = Z\). It is not possible to directly read out the amplitudes of a qubits state. A *measurement* has to be performed instead. Quantum measurement is defined with respect to a basis and yields one of the basis vectors with a probability related to the amplitudes of the quantum state. Of importance in this work are \(Z\)-and \(X\)-measurements. \(Z\)-measurement is defined with respect to basis \((\ket0, \ket1)\). Applying a \(Z\)-measurement to a qubit in state \(\ket{\psi}= \alpha_0\ket{0} + \alpha_1\ket{1}\) yields \(\ket0\) with probability \(|\alpha_0|^2\) and \(\ket1\) with probability \(|\alpha_1|^2\). Moreover, the state \(\ket\psi\) *collapses* into the measured state, that is, becomes either \(\ket0\) or \(\ket1\). \(X\)-measurement is defined with respect to the basis \((\ket+, \ket-)\), where \(\ket{+} = \frac{1}{\sqrt2}(\ket{0} + \ket{1})\) and \(\ket{-}=\frac{1}{\sqrt2}(\ket{0}-\ket{1})\). A multi-qubit circuit processes states represented by an exponential number of amplitudes. The state of a circuit with \(n\) qubits has \(2^n\) amplitudes \(\alpha_y\) with \(y \in \{0, 1\}^n\) and \(\sum_y|\alpha_y|^2 = 1\). For example, the state of a 2-qubit circuit is \(\ket{\psi}= (\alpha_{00}, \alpha_{01}, \alpha_{10}, \alpha_{11})^T = \alpha_{00}\ket{00} + \alpha_{01}\ket{01} + \alpha_{10}\ket{10} + \alpha_{11}\ket{11}\). Here, \(\ket{00} = (1, 0, 0, 0)^T\), \(\ket{01} = (0, 1, 0, 0)^T\), \(\ket{10} = (0, 0, 1, 0)^T\) and \(\ket{11} = (0, 0, 0, 1)^T\) form a basis for \(\mathbb{C}^4\). Measuring multiple qubits of a circuit again results in one basis vector with the probability given by the corresponding amplitude, \(|\alpha_y|^2\). Quantum gates may act on several qubits simultaneously. A gate that acts on \(n\) qubits is represented by a \(2^n \times 2^n\) complex unitary matrix. One important two-qubit gate is the *controlled-not* \(CNOT(c,t)\) gate, where the \(c\) qubit conditionally flips the state of the \(t\) qubits when set to \(\ket{1}\). Moreover, it is possible to represent a single-qubit gate (or, more generally, a gate acting on less qubits than \(n\)) by using tensor product. For example, the \(2^2 \times 2^2\) matrix \(H \otimes I\) (where \(I\) is the identity matrix) applies the Hadamard gate \(H\) to the first qubit of a two-qubit circuit while leaving the second qubit unchanged. The first qubit of the CNOT gate is called *control qubit* \(c\) and the second is the *target qubit* \(t\). Below are the matrices of the \(CNOT(c=1,t=2)\) and the \(H \otimes I\) operations. \[\begin{aligned} CNOT \!=\! \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix} && H \!\otimes\! I \!=\! \frac1{\sqrt2}\!\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 &-1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 &-1 \end{pmatrix} \end{aligned}\] A quantum circuit with \(n\) qubits and \(m\) gates \(g_1, \ldots, g_m\) takes an *input state* \(\phi_0 \in \mathbb{C}^{2^n}\) and successively applies the transformations corresponding to each gate: \(\phi_1 = M_{g_1} \phi_0\); \(\phi_2 = M_{g_2} \phi_1\); and so forth, where \(M_{g_i}\) is the \(2^n \times 2^n\) matrix of gate \(g_i\). Selective qubit measurement may also be interspersed with these gates and at the end of computation the *output state* \(\phi_m\) of the circuit is completely measured. # Fault-Tolerant Gate Set {#sec:ft} It is important to distinguish between the generic mathematical model of quantum computation and subsets of it that are suited for an actual physical realisation. A number of technologies have been suggested for implementing quantum computation. While every unitary complex matrix qualifies as a quantum gate in the mathematical formalism, most implementation technologies only allow a direct physical realisation of relatively few gates. Therefore, *universal gate sets*, that is, collections of quantum gates that can represent or approximate an arbitrary quantum circuit, are of interest This concept is similar to universal gate libraries in digital circuit design, where each Boolean function can be mapped to a circuit composed of, for instance, AND2 gates and inverters. One instance of a universal quantum gate set is \(\{CNOT, H, P, T\}\). A technology is suitable for realisation of arbitrary quantum algorithms if it has a direct implementation for at least one universal gate set. A further key requirement for successful realisation of quantum circuits is the ability to perform *error correction* during computation. States of actual quantum systems are inherently fragile and are affected even by the slightest interaction with their environment. Therefore, *quantum error-correcting codes* (QECC) introduce substantial redundancy to compensate for impact on the quantum state. For instance, Shor's code uses nine qubits to represent one *encoded* qubit: the qubit is first triplicated in order to detect and correct phase flips, and the resulting qubit triplet is again triplicated to protect them against bit flips. It can be shown that this construction is sufficient to correct all errors affecting any one of the nine physical qubits. We call the nine qubits used for encoding *physical qubits* and one error-corrected qubit *logical qubit*. The strength of a QECC can be quantified by how many physical qubit errors that have to occur before the logical qubit is corrupted. For Shor's code, a single error on any of the nine physical qubit is tolerated; the probability of failure for the Shor's code is bounded by the probability of two or more errors occurring on separate qubits. More advanced codes can tolerate multiple errors and have lower probabilities of failure at the expense of more physical qubits to encode a single logical qubit. A *fault-tolerant gate* for a given QECC acts directly on encoded qubits and produces legal encodings with respect to that QECC at its outputs. For example, a fault-tolerant implementation of a CNOT gate for the Shor's code would take 18 physical qubits as inputs, interpret nine of the qubits as the logical control qubit and the other nine qubits as the logical target qubit, and produce 18 physical qubits that encode the two logical qubits as its outputs. In self-checking design of classical circuits, error-correcting codes with this property are called *closed* with respect to the gate's operation; for example, bi-residue codes are closed under both addition and multiplication. The closure property is advantageous because decoding and re-encoding of codewords before and after operation are avoided. This advantage is even more pronounced for quantum circuits with their extremely high expected error rates. As a consequence, a practical universal gate set should consist of fault-tolerant gates that allow circuit operation with errors continuously taking place. # Teleporation-based Quantum Computing {#sec:teleport} In this paper, we focus on a set of operations that can be implemented in a fault-tolerant manner with respect to several state-of-the-art QECC. This set consists of the CNOT gate and two *state injection* operations. State injection refers to initializing a qubit in one of the two following states \[\ket{A}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\ket{0}+e^{i\pi/4}\ket{1}) \qquad \ket{Y}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\ket{0}+i\ket{1}).\] Using these states and a technique called *quantum teleportation*, it is possible to obtain the following three quantum gates: \[\begin{aligned} R_x\left(\frac\pi4\right) = \frac1{\sqrt2}\begin{pmatrix} 1 &-i \\-i & 1 \end{pmatrix} \end{aligned}\] \[\begin{aligned} R_z\left(\frac{\pi}{4}\right) = P = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & i \end{pmatrix} && R_z\left(\frac{\pi}{8}\right) = T = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & e^{i\frac{\pi}{8}} \end{pmatrix} \end{aligned}\] In the *Bloch sphere representation* of a quantum state, \(R_x(\theta)\) and \(R_z(\theta)\) stand for a rotation around the \(X\)-and the \(Z\)-axis by angle \(\theta\); see for details. We use the following abbreviations for brevity: \(R^4_x := R_x(\pi / 4); R^4_z := R_z(\pi / 4) \equiv P; R^8_z := R_z(\pi / 8)\equiv T\). Using the relationship \(H = R_z^4R_x^4R_z^4\), the complete universal gate set \(\{CNOT, H, P, T\}\) can be obtained based on CNOT, state injection and quantum teleportation. All these gates are compatible with error-corrected, fault-tolerant computation. However, quantum teleportation is probabilistic itself and may require (classical) correction that will be tracked. This is described in detail below. The rotational gates \(R^4_x\), \(R^4_z\) and \(R^8_z\) are constructed by combining state injection with quantum teleportation. Applying the three employed rotational gates to an arbitrary state \(\ket{\phi}\) by quantum teleportation is shown in Fig. [\[fig:tele\]](#fig:tele){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:tele"}. An auxilliary qubit is initialised in state \(\ket{Y}\) or \(\ket{A}\) (depending on the desired rotation), and a CNOT gate is applied at the qubit that holds \(\ket{\phi}\) and the auxilliary qubit (the control and target qubits are denoted by \(\bullet\) and \(\oplus\), respectively). Finally, a measurement (either \(X\) or \(Z\)) is performed at the control output of the CNOT gate, indicated in Fig. [\[fig:tele\]](#fig:tele){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:tele"} by an encircled \(X\) or \(Z\). The effect at the target output is shown in Fig. [\[fig:tele\]](#fig:tele){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:tele"} The \(X\)-measurement in circuit of Fig. [\[fig:tele\]](#fig:tele){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:tele"}a yields either \(\ket{+}\) or \(\ket{-}\). If the measurement result is \(\ket{+}\), then the desired rotation \(R_x(\pi / 4)\) was executed and the new state at the output of the circuit is correct. If the measurement result is \(\ket{-}\), the applied rotation was \(R_x(-\pi / 4)\), i.e., the direction of the rotation was wrong. This is easily compensated by performing another rotation by angle \(\pi/2\), namely applying the gate \(R_x(\pi/2) = X\). It is easily checked that \(XR_x(-\pi / 4) = R_x(\pi / 4)\). Consequently, quantum teleportation must be followed by executing the \(X\) gate at the obtained state if the measurement result is \(\ket{-}\). We call this *\(X\)-correction*. Note that the decision whether \(X\)-correction is required is based on classical information (a measurement result) and can be taken by a classical computer. The two possible \(Z\)-measurement results from the circuit in circuit of Fig. [\[fig:tele\]](#fig:tele){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:tele"}b implementing \(R_z^4\) are \(\ket{0}\) and \(\ket{1}\). The state \(\ket{0}\) indicates a correct teleportation where the resulting state is \(\ket{\psi}=R_z(\pi/4)\ket{\phi}\). A measured state \(\ket{1}\) is an indicator for the state \(\ket{\psi_f}=\alpha_1\ket{0}-i\alpha_0\ket{1}\) where the input state was \(\ket{\phi}=\alpha_0\ket{0} + \alpha_1\ket{1}\). In order to obtain the correct state, a \(Z\) operation followed by the \(X\) operation is applied, as it is easily verified that \(\ket{\psi}=XZ\ket{\psi_f}=\alpha_0\ket{0}+i\alpha_1\ket{1} = R^4_z\ket{\phi}\). This operation is called \(XZ\) correction. This gate is implemented in two stages (see Fig. [\[fig:tele\]](#fig:tele){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:tele"}c). The first teleporation maps state \(\ket A\) to an intermediate state, which is then given to the \(R_z^4\) gate from Fig. [\[fig:tele\]](#fig:tele){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:tele"}b that also incorporates a teleportation. The following three measurement outcomes have to be distinguished: 1. If the first measurement results in \(\ket{0}\), the intermediate state is the correct result already. No correction is required, and the second rotation (including the corresponding measurement) does not have to be applied. 2. If the first measurement results in \(\ket{1}\) and the input state was \(\ket{\phi}=\alpha_0\ket{0} + \alpha_1\ket{1}\), the calculated state is \(\ket{\psi_{f1}}=XR_z^{4\dagger}\ket{\phi} =\alpha_0\ket{1}+e^{-i\pi/4}\alpha_1\ket{0}\). This state will be used as an input for the \(\pi/2\) correctional rotation (\(R_z^4\) from Fig. [\[fig:tele\]](#fig:tele){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:tele"}b). If the second measurement returns \(\ket{1}\), then the correction succeeded, and no further corrections are necessary: \(\ket{\psi}=\alpha_0\ket{0} + e^{i\pi/4}\alpha_1\ket{1}=R^8_z\ket{\phi}\). 3. If the first measurement returns \(\ket{1}\), and the second measurement yields \(\ket{0}\), then the \(R_z^4\) correction will produce state \(\ket{\psi_{f2}} = i\alpha_0\ket{0} + e^{-i\pi/4}\alpha_1\ket{0}\). Then, as seen above, the \(XZ\) correction leads to \(\ket{\psi}=XZ\ket{\psi_{f2}} = \alpha_0\ket{0}+e^{i\pi/4}\alpha_1\ket{1}=R_x^8\ket{\phi}.\) In summary, teleporations are probabilistic and either \(X\) or \(XZ\) corrections may be required depending on the outcomes of the measurement. It is important to understand that this non-determinism is *not* due to errors but is inherent to teleportation-based quantum computing. Algorithm [\[alg:tele\]](#alg:tele){reference-type="ref" reference="alg:tele"} summarises the complete computation procedure incorporating all the required corrections in detail. The algorithm assumes a circuit that has already been mapped to the universal gates set consisting of the CNOT gate and the three considered rotational gates. Note that the only operations applied are state injections and CNOT gates, and that these operations are compatible with standard fault-tolerant error correction. The computation contiunuously requests new qubits and abandons the old ones, such that the total number of used logical qubits is \(n\) or \(n + 1\) at any given time. In many relevant implementation technologies, hardware for each abandoned qubit can be reused for the newly requested ones. For example, if a new qubit is introduced for injecting the \(\ket Y\) state in order to implement the \(R^4_x\) gate, the old qubit is no longer required after the \(X\)-measurement, and it can be used for implementing further rotational gates. & # Simulation Results {#sec:sims} We implemented the Pauli tracking algorithm and applied it to a number of randomly generated quantum circuits with \(n\) logical qubits and \(m\) gates from the considered gate set. The results for 100, 1100 and 5100 qubits are shown in Table [3](#tab:expres){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:expres"}. \(n = 100\) is indicative of largest quantum circuits within reach of today's state-of-the-art technology and \(n = 1100\) and \(n = 5100\) are the expected sizes of quantum computers within a decade. It can be seen that Pauli tracking is fast and all calculations can be performed within a few seconds for all cases. The expected number of corrections without Pauli tracking is \(0.5\cdot m_4 + 0.75 m_8 \approx m\), where \(m_4\) is the number of gates \(R^4_x\) and \(R^4_z\) which require a correction with a probability 0.5 and \(m_8\) is the number of gates \(R^8_z\) which may require one or two corrections with the expected number of corrections equal to 0.75. The expected number of corrections with Pauli tracking is bounded by \(n\), because corrections have to be performed on each output \(k\) with \(s_k \neq I\). As most relevant circuits have far more gates than qubits, Pauli tracking substantially reduces the overall effort for corrections. # Conclusions We have presented an algorithm that can be used to perform Pauli tracking on quantum circuits compatible with all major classes of QECC. This result helps fill an important gap in the classical control software needed for large-scale quantum computation. Pauli tracking is instrumental for both error correction and for teleportation based protocols and this algorithm is easily adjustable to incorporate the required tracking for a specific implementation of quantum error correction. Future work will be focused on adapting this algorithm to popular error correction techniques such as Topological codes which requires even more intensive Pauli tracking due to the enormous number of teleportation gates necessary to perform a fully fault-tolerant, error corrected computation.

{'timestamp': '2014-01-24T02:04:06', 'yymm': '1401', 'arxiv_id': '1401.5872', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5872'}

# Introduction It is believed that black holes reside in X-ray binaries and active galactic nuclei (AGN) with typical masses \(\sim10M_{\odot}\) and \(10^{6}-10^{9}M_{\odot}\) respectively. Massive black holes may grow up through gas accretion or/and mergers, which is also related with the galaxy evolution [e.g., @1996MNRAS.283..854M; @2004MNRAS.351..169M; @2005ApJ...620...69V; @2008ApJ...684..822B; @2013ApJ...762...68D]. The structure and radiation of accretion disks surrounding black holes have been extensively studied in the last several decades. Relativistic jets have been observed in some X-ray binaries and AGNs, which is thought to be related to accretion disks or/and spinning black holes. A black hole can be described by two quantities: the mass \(M\) and the dimensionless spin parameter \(a_{\ast}=cJ/GM^{2}\), where \(J\) is the angular momentum of the black hole. In the last decade, great progresses have been achieved on the mass measurement of black holes in either active or nonactive galaxies. The black hole mass in nearby galaxies can be estimated with the correlations between black hole mass and the stellar velocity dispersion or bulge luminosity of the host galaxy. For active galaxies, the size of the broad-line region (BLR) is measured with reverberation mapping method, and the black hole mass can be estimated with the broad-line width assuming the motion of BLR clouds to be virialized. There is a tight correlation between the BLR size and the optical continuum luminosity, which is widely used to estimate masses of black holes in AGNs, or called as single epoch reverberation mapping method [e.g., @2000ApJ...533..631K; @2002ApJ...581L...5W; @2011ApJS..194...45S; @2012ApJS..201...38T]. Compared with the mass estimates, the measurements of the black hole spins are still far from satisfactory, though great efforts have been devoted on this issue. The observed broad Fe K\(\alpha\) emission lines provide a way to estimate the black hole spin parameters, which is applicable for black holes in both galactic X-ray binaries and AGNs. The observed broad Fe K\(\alpha\) emission lines are believed to be emitted from the inner regions of the accretion disks. The radii of the innermost stable circular orbits (ISCO) of the gas in the accretion disks can be inferred from the observed asymmetric Fe k\(\alpha\) line profiles, and the dimensionless spin \(a_{\ast}\) can be determined with the radii of the ISCO. The application of this method requires high quality X-ray spectroscopic data, and a few black hole spins in nearby Seyfert galaxies have been measured in this way. The black hole spin parameters in some X-ray binaries were measured by fitting the observed continuum spectra with general relativistic accretion disk models [so-called "continuum-fitting method\", @1997ApJ...482L.155Z; @2006ApJ...636L.113S; @2009ApJ...701L..83S; @2011ApJ...742...85G; @2011CQGra..28k4009M; @arXiv:1506.03959]. In principle, this method can be used to constrain the black hole spins for AGNs. In some early works, the accretion disk models were used to fit the observed multi-band spectra of quasars [e.g., @1987ApJ...314..699B; @1989ApJ...346...68S], in which the general relativistic effects have been taken into account. estimated the black hole spin to be \(a_{\ast}=0.3\) by fitting the broad band (IR/optical/UV) continuum spectrum of the quasar SDSS J094533.99+100950.1. It was found that the model fitting suffers from the degeneracy of the disk parameters, namely, the black hole mass \(M\), the spin \(a_{\ast}\), and the mass accretion rate \(\dot{M}\). At the time before the invention of the black hole mass measurements used nowadays, the derived disk parameters with the spectral fittings are quite uncertain. It is possible to constrain the the spins of the massive black holes in AGNs, when the black hole masses are measured. The degeneracy of the parameters in accretion disk spectral fittings can be eliminated if the peak frequency and luminosity of the accretion disk are well observed. However, the application of this method in AGNs meets a major difficulty, i.e., the spectral peaks of accretion disks surrounding massive black holes with \(\sim10^{8}M_{\odot}\) are in the far-UV or soft X-ray band, which are unobservable for most AGNs. The observed ultraviolet (UV)/optical emission of AGNs is thought to be a thermal emission from the optically thick accretion flows, while they are too cold to reproduce the observed power-law hard X-ray spectra of AGNs. The hard X-ray spectra of AGNs most likely originate from the inverse Compton process in which soft photons from the disks are scattered by the hot electrons in the coronas. According to this disk-corona scenario, most gravitational energy is generated in the cold disk, while a fraction of it is carried into the corona likely by the magnetic loops in the disk. calculated the structure and spectrum of a geometrically thin accretion disk with a corona in AGNs, in which the corona is assumed to be powered by the reconnection of the magnetic loops originating from the cold accretion disk due to buoyancy instability. It is found that both the hard X-ray bolometric correction factor \(L_{\rm bol}/L_{\rm X,2-10 keV}\) and the hard X-ray spectral index increase with the Eddington ratio, which are qualitatively consistent with the observations (e.g., Wang et al., 2004; Shemmer et al., 2006; Vasudevan & Fabian, 2007; Zhou & Zhao 2010; Fanali et al., 2013). This model was expanded in the general relativistic frame for a spinning Kerr black hole by, in which the spectra of such a accretion disk-corona are recalculated taking into account general relativistic effect with the relativistic ray-tracing method. As discussed above, the peaks of the spectra of the accretion disks surrounding massive black holes in AGNs are usually not observed [but also see @2010ApJ...723..508Y for the case of a relative small black hole in a narrow-line quasar]. However, a portion of the soft photons originating from the disk undergoing Comptonization in the hot corona, and the scattered photons are dominantly in the hard X-ray band. This implies that the observed hard X-ray spectra (luminosity and spectral shape) contain the information of the incident spectra from the cold disk. It seems possible to constrain the values of black hole spin parameter \(a_{\ast}\) in AGNs with a general relativistic accretion disk corona model, as a variant of the continuum-fitting method, even if the spectral peaks of the accretion disks are not observed. In this paper, we use the general relativistic model of an accretion disk-corona surrounding a spinning black hole to fit the observed multi-band spectra of AGNs with measured black hole masses. The black hole spinning parameter \(a_{\ast}\) are tentatively derived for a small sample of AGNs. We briefly summarize the accretion disk-corona model used for AGN spectral fitting in Section 2. The results and discussion are in Sections 3 and 4. Throughout this paper, a cosmology with \(H_{0}=70 {\rm km~ s}^{-1}{\rm Mpc}^{-1}\), \(\Omega_{\rm m}=0.3\) and \(\Omega_{\Lambda}=0.7\) is adopted. # Model In this work, we adopt the Kerr black hole accretion disk-corona model developed by. All the general relativistic effects are properly considered in both the calculations of the structure and emergent spectra of the accretion disks. We briefly summarize the model in the next two sub-sections [see @2012ApJ...761..109Y for the details]. ## Structure of an accretion disk with corona In the accretion disk corona model, most gravitational energy of the gas is dissipated in the cold disk, and a portion of it is carried into the corona by the magnetic loops. The particles in the corona are heated by the re-connection of the loops in the corona. The electrons in the corona are hot, and the observed hard X-ray spectra mostly originate from the inverse Compton process in which soft photons from the thermal radiation of the cold disk are scattered to high energy by the hot electrons [e.g., @1979ApJ...229..318G; @1991ApJ...380L..51H; @1994ApJ...436..599S]. The gravitational power of the gas generated in the cold accretion disk surrounding a spining black hole is \[\label{q_disk_plus} Q_{\rm dissi}^{+}={\frac {3GM\dot{M}}{8\pi R^{3}}}{\frac {L}{BC^{1/2}}},\] where \(L\), \(B\), \(C\) are the general relativistic correction factors, and \(\dot{M}\) is the mass accretion rate of the disk. The fraction of the dissipated power transported to the corona can be estimated provided the strength of the magnetic field is known. The magnetic pressure of the disk is usually assumed to scale with the gas or/and radiation pressure of the disk depending on the different magnetic stresses adopted. The detailed physics of the field generation is still quite unclear, though the different magnetic stressed are tested against the observations in AGNs in the previous works. For simplicity, the ratio \(f\) of the dissipated power in the corona to that in the disk is taken as a parameter in our model calculations, \[\label{q_cor_plus} f={\frac {Q_{\rm cor}^{+}}{Q_{\rm dissi}^{+}}},\] which will be determined by the comparison with the observed spectra. A portion of the soft photons from the disk undergo inverse Comptonization to high energy in the corona, which correspondingly cools the electrons in the corona. About half of the scattered photons are intercepted by the disk, some of which are reflected and the rest heats the disk and re-radiate as blackbody radiation. Therefore the energy equation for the cold disk is \[\label{energy_equation} Q_{\rm dissi}^{+}-Q_{\rm cor}^{+}+\frac{1}{2}(1-\varepsilon)Q_{\rm cor}^{+}=\frac{4\sigma T_{\rm d}^{4}}{3\tau}=\sigma T_{\rm s}^{4},\] where the reflection albedo \(\varepsilon=0.15\) is adopted in all our calculations, \(\tau=\tau_{\rm es}+\tau_{\rm ff}\) is the optical depth in the vertical direction of the disk, and \(T_{\rm d}\) and \(T_{\rm s}\) are the temperature in the mid-plane of the disk and the temperature of the gas at the disk surface respectively. ## Emergent spectrum of the accretion disk with corona It is well known that most of the radiation of the disk comes from the inner region of the disk. The spectrum of an accretion disk-corona for a spinning black hole is influenced by the relativistic effects, i.e., the frame dragging, gravitational redshift, and photon trajectory bending, due to the strong gravity field of the black hole [@1985Ap&SS.113..181Z; @1989MNRAS.238..897L; @1991ApJ...376...90L; @2005ApJS..157..335L; @2009ApJ...699..513L; @2012ApJ...761..109Y], especially for the emission from the region near the black hole. The ray-tracing method is widely adopted in this kind of spectral calculations. Considering the complexity of the radiation transfer of Comptonized photons in the geometrically thick corona, calculated the emergent Comptonized spectrum from the corona by dividing layers in the corona with the ray-tracing method. In this work, we follow the same routine of to calculate the spectrum of an accretion disk-corona for a rotating black hole, in which all the general relativistic effects are taken into account [see Section 3.4 in @2012ApJ...761..109Y for the details] The radiation from geometrically thin, optically thick accretion disk is anisotropic, and the specific intensity of the disk emission, \(I_{\mu}\propto (1+2\mu)\), in the co-moving frame of the disk, where \(\mu=\cos\theta\) [\(\theta\) is the angle between the line of sight and the normal of the disk @1960ratr.book.....C; @1985A&A...143..374S; @2011ApJ...728L..44L]. UV/soft X-ray photons are emitted from the inner region of the accretion disk, where a hot plasma layer is present above the disk surface caused by the illumination of the external hard X-ray emission from the corona. The electron scattering opacity dominates over absorption in this hot layer, and the emergent spectrum of the disk departures from the black body emission due to radiative transfer. calculated the vertical structure and emergent spectra of the disks with a hot plasma layer by including a self-consistent treatment of Compton scattering. found that the derived emergent spectrum could be well reproduced by blackbody emission with a higher color temperature, \(T_{\rm rad}=f_{\rm col}T_{\rm d}\). The empirical color correction factor \(f_{\rm col}\) is given by \[\label{color_correction} f_{\rm col}(T_{\rm d})=f_{\infty}-\frac{(f_{\infty}-1)[1+\exp(-\nu_{\rm b}/\Delta\nu)]}{1+\exp[(\nu_{\rm p}-\nu_{\rm b})/\Delta\nu]}\] where \(\nu_{\rm p}\equiv2.82k_{\rm B}T_{\rm d}/h\), \(f_{\infty}=2.3\) and \(\nu_{\rm b}=\Delta\nu=5\times10^{15} \rm Hz\). The local spectrum emitted from the disk can be calculated with \[\label{UV} F_{\nu}\propto \frac{1}{f_{\rm col}^{4}} \pi I_{\nu}(f_{\rm col}T_{\rm d}),\] where \(I_{\nu}\) is the local blackbody emission. As described in Section 2.1, the structure of the accretion disk-corona can be calculated when the values of the black hole mass \(M\), the dimensionless spin \(a_{\ast}\), the mass accretion rate \(\dot{m}\), and the ratio \(f\) of the dissipated power in the corona to that in the disk, are specified. With the derived structure of the accretion disk, we use the ray tracing method to calculate the emergent spectrum of the disk corona system observed in infinity at a viewing angle \(\theta\). We plot the representive emergent spectra with different values of the ratio \(f\) in Fig. [\[f_sed\]](#f_sed){reference-type="ref" reference="f_sed"} to show the effect of \(f\) on the overall shape of the spectra. At a given radius, both the energy dissipated in the disk and the disk temperature decrease with energy ratio \(f\) according to Eq. ([\[q_cor_plus\]](#q_cor_plus){reference-type="ref" reference="q_cor_plus"}). Therefore, the specific intensity of the soft photons from the disk will also decrease with the ratio \(f\). In this case, the electron temperature will increase with \(f\), since the cooling of the corona is dominated by the inverse Compton scattering of the soft photons from the disk by the hot electrons in the corona. This means that the resulting spectra in the hard X-ray band become much harder and brighter with the increase in the ratio \(f\), given that more soft photons from the disk will be Compton scattered to higher energy by the hot electrons in the corona (see Fig. [\[f_sed\]](#f_sed){reference-type="ref" reference="f_sed"}). # Results Using the accretion disk model described in Section 2, we fit the observed multi-band spectral energy distributions (SEDs) of five quasars which exhibit obvious feature of so-called "Big Blue Bump\" (BBB) with measured black hole masses and good X-ray measurements. The peak of BBB at \(\sim 10^{15}-10^{16}\) Hz and a power-law hard X-ray spectrum are the typical features of the spectrum of an accretion disk with corona [e.g., @2009MNRAS.394..207C; @2012ApJ...761..109Y]. As discussed in Section 1, the peaks of the BBBs are beyond the waveband coverage of the instruments for most AGNs due to their massive black holes. However, the left tail of the BBBs can be observed in infared/optical/UV wavebands, which provide useful information of the BBBs [e.g., @2013MNRAS.431..210C]. The SED data of five quasars in this work is taken from and summarized in Tables 1 and 2. The black hole masses \(M\) of these five quasars are given in, which are estimated with the broad-line width and the scaling relationships. The infrared emission from these quasars may probably be dominated by the radiation from the dust tori, while the origin of the soft X-ray excess observed in AGNs is still controversial [see, e.g., @2012MNRAS.420.1848D and the references therein]. Therefore, the infrared and soft X-ray spectral data are not used in our model fitting on the SEDs.

{'timestamp': '2015-11-20T02:09:03', 'yymm': '1401', 'arxiv_id': '1401.5659', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5659'}

# Introduction[\[introduction\]]{#introduction label="introduction"} Galactic scaling relations such as the 'main sequence of star formation' [the relation between star-formation rate and stellar mass, see @2007ApJ...660L..43N; @2007ApJ...670..156D; @2011ApJ...742...96W] provide important constraints on galaxy evolution models and the physical processes involved. One such relation reflects that massive star-forming galaxies contain large amounts of dust while old elliptical (red and dead) galaxies do not. This qualitative notion was quantified by who showed that for SDSS galaxies there is a tight \(M_{\rm dust}\)--SFR relation, \(M_{\rm dust}\) \(\sim\) SFR\(^{1.11\pm0.01}\). The \(M_{\rm dust}\)--SFR relation presented by consists of 3258 low-redshift SDSS galaxies with complementary data from GALEX, 2MASS and IRAS. The 1653 data points with the highest signal-to-noise ratio are reproduced in Figure [\[f:dacunha\]](#f:dacunha){reference-type="ref" reference="f:dacunha"} (blue data points). Naively, one might interpret this to be a causal relation, either due to star formation induced by the prior presence of dust as seeds for star formation (although this poses the question of where the initial amounts of dust come from in the first place) or as a direct consequence of dust produced following massive star formation (or, rather, death). However, advocated a different scenario in which the relation emerges as a consequence of the parallel decline of dust and SFR due to the decreasing gas mass available for star formation as time goes on and a simultaneous decline in total dust mass due to dust destruction. To shed further light on the \(M_{\rm dust}\)--SFR relation we here populate the observational diagram with additional classes of galaxies. In particular, in Section 2 we extend it to higher SFR and \(M_{\rm dust}\) by including sub-millimeter galaxies (SMGs). These galaxies bring important new insight into the physical origin of the relation. In Section 3 we model the extended relation using simple chemical evolution models for massive galaxies, both from a simple analytical perspective and using full numerical models. In particular, we show that the slope of the relation can be related to the exponent of the Schmidt--Kennicutt star-formation law, relating the SFR to the available gas reservoir. Finally, in Section 4, we discuss how starbursts, quiescent star formation and quenching of the star formation cause galaxies to move around in the diagram and contribute to the significant scatter revealed here. # The \(M_{\rm dust}\)--SFR relation[\[relation\]]{#relation label="relation"} We supplement the original \(M_{\rm dust}\)--SFR relation with the *Herschel* early-type galaxies (ETGs) and passive spirals studied by. These are plotted in Figure [\[f:dacunha\]](#f:dacunha){reference-type="ref" reference="f:dacunha"} as red filled (ETGs) and open (spirals) circles. The Milky Way data point is taken from. For SMGs we use recent ALMA based data points from. The and data points are for a initial mass function (IMF) and a dust mass absorption coefficient of \(0.77\) cm\(^2\) g\(^{-1}\) at 850 \(\mu m\), as implemented in MAGPHYS. The SFR was obtained by multiplying the far-infrared luminosity by \(10^{-10}\) M\(_\odot\) L\(_\odot\[^{-1}\) yr\(^{-1}\) (appropriate for a Chabrier IMF; the UV contribution to the total SFR in SMGs is negligible). The quoted dust masses were multiplied by 1.5/0.77 to rescale to the same dust mass absorption coefficient. We note that while the literature data have been scaled to the same IMF and dust mass absorption coefficient, systematic offsets in the different subsamples may remain, due to different wavelength coverage, redshift, and methods of analysis used. For example, the lack of long-wavelength (\(>100\) \(\mu\)m) data in may bias dust temperatures high and hence dust masses low. The relation (shown as a thick pale-blue dashed line) does not extend to very high SFRs and dust masses. Extrapolating the relation to high SFRs shows that observed dust masses are about an order of magnitude smaller than predicted (this effect would be even stronger if the dust masses are underestimated). It is also evident that the relation is not as sharply defined as suggested by the SDSS galaxies alone. We discuss these effects below. # Evolution of dust and star formation in massive galaxies[\[chemical\]]{#chemical label="chemical"} Chemical evolution models can be used to study the temporal evolution of dust, gas, abundance distribution of elements, stellar mass and metallicity in a galaxy. The models are governed by processes regulating the evolution of a galaxy and, thus, are useful to study not only the chemical history but also to trace the SFR and the effects of the IMF, gas flows, and dust destruction and growth processes. Chemical evolution models have been applied to diverse types of galaxies, such as the Milky Way [see @1998ApJ...501..643D; @2008A&A...479..669C; @2008A&A...479..453Z and references therein], high-redshift galaxies or high-\(z\) quasars [e.g., @2007ApJ...662..927D; @2011A&A...528A..14G]. ## Basic equations[\[basic\]]{#basic label="basic"} In this Letter we model a galaxy as a homogeneous entity (no spatial dependence of its properties) and with no infalling or outflowing material (closed box approximation). Efficient supernova (SN) dust production is assumed, while dust grain growth in the interstellar medium (ISM) is not explicitly considered. Relevant rates are assumed to be independent of metallicity. The model is described in detail in, whose notation we adopt. The rate of change of the total dust mass is \]\frac{dM_{\mathrm{d}}}{dt} = E_{\mathrm{d,SN}}(t)+E_{\mathrm{d,AGB}}(t)-E_{\mathrm{D}}(t),\[ where \(E_{\mathrm{d,SN}}(t)\) and \(E_{\mathrm{d,AGB}}(t)\) are the dust injection rates of SNe and asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars, respectively. The SN dust production rate is \]E_{\rm d,SN}(t) =\int_{m_{\rm L}}^{m_{\rm U}} Y_{\rm Z}(m) \, \epsilon_{\rm SN}(m) \, \psi(t-\tau(m)) \phi(m)dm,\[ where \(m_{\rm L}\) and \(m_{\rm U}\) are the lower and upper mass limits for stars exploding as SNe, \(Y_{\rm Z}(m)\) is the mass of ejected metal yields per SN, \(\epsilon_{\rm SN}(m)\) is the SN dust production efficiency as defined in , \(\psi(t)\) is the SFR, \(\tau(m)\) is the main sequence lifetime of a star with mass \(m\), and \(\phi(m)\) is the IMF, normalized in the interval \([m_{1}, m_{2}]\) as \(\int_{m_{1}}^{m_{2}} m \, \phi(m) \, \mathrm{d}m = 1\), with \(m_1\) and \(m_2\) being the low and high mass cutoffs for the adopted IMF, respectively. The rate of dust destruction due to astration and shocks in the interstellar medium , respectively, is defined as \]E_{\mathrm{D}}(t) = \eta_d(t)(\psi(t)+M_{\mathrm{cl}}R_{\mathrm{SN}}(t)),\[ where \(M_{\mathrm{cl}}\) is the mass of interstellar material swept up and cleared of dust by a single SN, and \]R_{\mathrm{SN}}(t) =\int_{m_{\mathrm{L}}}^{m_{\mathrm{U}}} \psi(t-\tau) \phi(m) \mathrm{d}m\[ is the SN rate. The dust-to-ISM ratio is \]\eta_{\mathrm{d}}(t) = \frac{M_{\mathrm{d}}(t)}{M_{\mathrm{ISM}}(t)},\[ where \]M_{\mathrm{ISM}}(t)=M_{\mathrm{d}}(t)+M_{\mathrm{g}}(t).\[ The equation for the evolution of the gas mass is \]\frac{dM_{\mathrm{g}}}{dt} = E_{\mathrm{g}}(t)+ \eta_{\mathrm{d}}(t)M_{\mathrm{cl}}R_{\mathrm{SN}}(t)- \psi(t) \, (1-\eta_{\mathrm{d}}(t)),\[ where \(E_{\mathrm{g}}(t)\) is the rate of gaseous material returned to the ISM. Finally, we assume a global star-formation law, inspired by the Schmidt--Kennicutt law, \]\psi(t) = \psi_{\rm ini} \left ( \frac{M_{\mathrm{ISM}}(t)}{M_{\rm ini}}\right ) ^k, \label{schmidt}\[, where \(\psi_{\rm ini}\) and \(M_{\mathrm{ini}}\) are the initial SFR and gas mass, and \(k\) is the global Schmidt--Kennicutt exponent, usually taken to be 1.0 or 1.5. ## Approximations and simplifications[\[simplifications\]]{#simplifications label="simplifications"} We next introduce several simplifications which will allow us to capture the essentials (but not the details) of the chemical evolution equations: We assume that SN yields are released into the ISM instantly after the progenitor star is born, i.e., \(\tau\approx 0\), in which case \]R_{\mathrm{SN}}(t) =\gamma \psi(t),\[ where \]\gamma = \int_{m_{\mathrm{L}}}^{m_{\mathrm{U}}} \phi(m) \mathrm{d}m\[ is the SN rate to SFR ratio. We ignore the contribution from AGB stars or other sources to the evolution of the dust mass, so \]\frac{dM_{\mathrm{d}}}{dt} = E_{\mathrm{d,SN}}(t)-E_{\mathrm{D}}(t),\[ with \]E_{\rm d,SN}(t) = \mu_D \psi(t)\[ and \]E_{\mathrm{D}}(t) = \beta \eta_d(t)\psi(t),\[ where \(\mu_D\) is the dust productivity, and \]\beta = 1+\gamma M_{\mathrm{cl}}.\[ The resulting equation for the evolution of the dust mass is \]\frac{dM_{\mathrm{d}}}{dt} = (\mu_D-\beta \eta_d(t)) \psi(t).\[ We also assume that \(\eta_d \ll 1\) and that \(E_{\mathrm{g}}(t) \propto \psi(t)\), so the evolution of gas mass is \]\frac{dM_{\mathrm{g}}}{dt} =-\delta \psi(t),\[ where \(\delta\) is a constant of proportionality close to unity, and \]\psi(t)=\alpha M_g(t)^k; \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \alpha=\frac{\psi_{\rm ini}}{M_{\rm ini}^k}. \label{late1}\[ We study IMFs with \(\phi(m)\propto m^{-2.35}\exp(-m_{ch}/m)\) with \(m_{\rm L}=8\) M\(_\odot\) and \(m_{\rm U}=40\) M\(_\odot\), \(m_{\rm 1}=0.1\) M\(_\odot\) and \(m_{\rm 2}=100\) M\(_\odot\), and maximum SN dust production efficiency, corresponding to an average dust yield per SN of \(\sim 0.3\)--0.4 M\(_\odot\)İn particular, we study Salpeter (\(m_{ch}=0\)) and bottom-light (\(m_{ch}=10\) M\(_\odot\)) IMFs for which the conversions to Chabrier IMF SFRs are 1/1.8 and 3.0. For a bottom-light (Salpeter) IMF, the approximate values of the parameters entering are \(\gamma\approx 0.02\) (0.007) M\(_\odot\]^{-1}\), \(\delta\approx0.83\), \(\mu_D\approx0.018\) (0.003), \(M_{\rm cl}=0\)--1500 M\(_\odot\), and \(\beta=1\)--30. ## Analytical results[\[analytical\]]{#analytical label="analytical"} We next investigate simple analytical limiting cases at early and late times resulting from the above set of equations. ### Early times: The starburst limit[\[early\]]{#early label="early"} At early times, not much gas has been consumed, so \(M_g\approx M_{\rm ini}\) and \(\psi\approx \psi_{\rm ini}\). Thus \[\frac{dM_{ \rm d}}{dt} = \mu_D \psi_{\rm \rm ini}-\frac{ \beta \psi_{\rm ini} } {M_{\rm ini}} M_{ \rm d}(t)\] and so \[M_{ \rm d}(t) = \frac{\mu_D}{\beta} M_{\rm ini} \left (1-\exp\left ( {-\beta \frac{\psi_{\rm ini}}{M_{\rm ini}} t} \right ) \right ).\] In other words the maximum attainable dust mass is \(M_{ \rm d}(t)/M_{\rm ini} = \mu_D/\beta\) and for \(\beta t \ll \beta t_0 \equiv M_{\rm ini}/\psi_{\rm ini}\), \(M_{ \rm d}(t) = \mu_D \psi_{\rm ini} t\), i.e., \(M_{ \rm d} (t_0)= 0.63 (\mu_D/\beta) M_{\rm ini}\). For a bottom-light IMF (\(\mu_D=0.018\)), SNe will turn of order 1% of the initial total mass into dust in the absence of dust destruction (\(\beta=1\)), independent of the initial SFR. During this early phase, the dust mass is proportional to the SFR and the duration of the starburst. However, this is not the \(M_{\rm dust}\)--SFR relation we are seeking. To reach the dust levels observed, the galaxies would have been forming dust at a steady level for \(t=M_{ \rm d}(t) / (\mu_D \psi_{\rm ini}) \approx\) 4 Gyr (for a Salpeter IMF). While in some cases such an interpretation may be viable (e.g., for the Milky Way, see Hjorth et al. 2014), in general this time scale is uncomfortably long and the scenario is not expected to give rise to such a well-defined relation. ### Late times: quiescent star formation and the slope of the \(M_{\rm dust}\)-SFR relation At late times, star formation will decrease because of the reduced availability of gas. As a consequence of the lower SN rate, there is less dust production. The dust destruction term is a combination of consumption through astration and grain destruction due to SN shocks. We seek a relation consistent with the \(M_{\rm dust}\)--SFR relation and therefore make the *ansatz* \[M_d = A \psi^B.\] From this follows that \[\frac{dM_d}{dt} =-ABk\delta\alpha^{1/k} \psi^{B+1-1/k}.\] Requiring the exponent of \(\psi\) in Equations (15) and (21) to be equal, i.e., \(1=B+1-1/k\), yields \(B=1/k\). In other words, \[M_d = A \psi^{1/k}\] and hence \(M_d \propto M_g\), i.e., a constant dust-to-gas ratio, \(\eta_d\), during the late, non-starbursting phase. Indeed, requiring the prefactors of Equations (15) and (21) to be equal, \(\mu_D-\eta_d(t) \beta =-ABk\delta\alpha^{1/k}\), shows that \(\eta_d(t)\) must be time independent. The net dust evolution term is negative and equals \(-A\delta\alpha^{1/k}\). Note that for \(k=1.5\), \(M_d \propto \psi^{2/3}\), while for \(k=0.9\) one retrieves the \(M_{\rm dust}\)--SFR relation, \(M_d \propto \psi^{1.11}\). ## Numerical models[\[numerical\]]{#numerical label="numerical"} For illustration we compute full chemical evolution models with an initial mass of \(M_{\rm ini}= 3\times 10^{11}\) M\(_\odot\), initial SFRs corresponding to a Chabrier SFR of \(\psi_{\rm ini} = 1000\) M\(_\odot\) yr\(^{-1}\), a range of SN dust destruction clearing masses (\(M_{\rm cl}\)=0--1500 M\(_\odot\)), and for Salpeter or bottom-light IMFs. Regarding the Schmidt--Kennicutt slope (exponent denoted by \(N\) for surface densities, \(\Sigma_{\rm SFR} \propto \Sigma_{\rm mol}^N\)), found a slope of \(1.4\pm 0.15\) . argue on theoretical grounds that the local volumetric relation between SFR and gas should be \(\rho_{\rm SFR} \propto \rho_{\rm gas}^{1.5}\). The models of however suggest the slope is closer to unity at high densities or SFRs, due to stellar feedback. Indeed, find \(N\approx 1\) in resolved galaxies at \(z\approx 1.2\) while find \(N=1\pm 0.15\) for the relation between molecular mass and SFR in nearby galaxies. find a non-universal slope whose average is \(N=0.76\pm 0.16 (2\sigma\)). use \(k=1\) in their models of proto E galaxies. We here compute models with \(k\) ranging from 0.9 to 1.2 and evolve them over 10 Gyr. We plot the models in Figure [\[f:dacunha\]](#f:dacunha){reference-type="ref" reference="f:dacunha"}. As a benchmark model (thick solid curve) we choose a bottom-light IMF, no SN dust destruction, and \(k=0.9\) to match the observed \(M_{\rm dust}\)--SFR relation. The dashed curve shows the corresponding Salpeter IMF model, while the dotted curves show the effect of varying the SN dust destruction clearing mass, \(M_{\rm cl}\), for a bottom-light IMF. These models confirm that the power-law slope of the \(M_{\rm dust}\)--SFR relation at late times is consistent with \(1/k\). The differing IMFs or clearing masses primarily affect the normalization of the curves. The IMF has a strong effect on the total amount of dust produced, with bottom-light IMFs leading to significantly (up to an order of magnitude) higher dust masses, for a fixed (Chabrier IMF equivalent) SFR, confirming previous findings . More massive systems (not shown) also lead to higher dust masses. Thin solid lines show the effect of varying \(k\) and confirms the expected \(1/k\) behavior. We verified that incorporation of AGB stars does not change the overall qualitative behaviour of the models presented here. # Discussion[\[discussion\]]{#discussion label="discussion"} As shown by, using chemical evolution models, the \(M_{\rm dust}\)--SFR relation can be interpreted as an evolutionary sequence. This is partly confirmed by our analysis. In this picture, the initial phase is due to a starburst in which dust is built up at essentially constant star formation rate. Due to the maximum attainable dust mass derived in Section [\[early\]](#early){reference-type="ref" reference="early"}, the SMG data points are located, on average, below the extrapolation of the linear fit to the SDSS data points . We note that to reproduce the highest dust masses, very efficient formation of dust from the metals produced by SNe is required. The models do not reproduce such high dust masses. The high end of the \(M_{\rm dust}\)--SFR relation is therefore further evidence for a surprisingly efficient and rapid dust formation process at work, such as that inferred from SN 1987A. Presumably the dust is either formed directly in SNe or through rapid subsequent grain growth in the ejecta/remnant or the ISM, such that the majority of the refractory elements available are turned into dust. We note that, for the highest dust masses, significant SN dust destruction is not allowed by the models. The numerical models also confirm that the late evolution is characterized by a joint decay in dust mass and SFR rate which leads to a power-law relation between them, with a slope of \(1/k\). Hence, the slope of the \(M_{\rm dust}\)--SFR relation can be directly related to the global incarnation (Equation [\[schmidt\]](#schmidt){reference-type="ref" reference="schmidt"}) of the Schmidt--Kennicutt star-formation law . We note that the commonly adopted value of \(k=1.5\) is not favored by the models which seem to prefer values around \(1\pm 0.2\). The joint decay in these quantities is due to a delicate balance between continued star and dust formation and the parallel consumption of the available gas (and dust) reservoir and through dust destruction by SN shocks. The balance is characterized by a roughly constant dust-to-gas ratio along the \(M_{\rm dust}\)--SFR relation. We may consider the early and late phases to be two stages of star formation; the first being the rapid starburst when all the dust is formed, the second being quiescently star-forming galaxies. Of course, the "initial" starburst in the chemical evolution model need not necessarily refer to the very beginning of the evolution of a galaxy--it may for example relate to the time when a lot of gas (\(M_{\rm ini}\)) is supplied to the galaxy (e.g., through a merger). It is also possible that some galaxies undergo several starbursts. Other processes may be at work in shaping the \(M_{\rm dust}\)--SFR diagram. Quenching of star formation will lead to a rapid decline in the SFR. If this is due to removal of cold gas and dust from the galaxy [e.g., due to heating or expulsion, @2008ApJS..175..356H], a parallel decline in the dust mass will lead to a transition more or less parallel to the \(M_{\rm dust}\)--SFR relation. However, if the star formation is quenched but the dust retained [e.g., when the cold gas reservoir, such as a gaseous galactic disk, becomes stable against fragmentation to bound clumps, so-called morphological quenching, see @2009ApJ...707..250M; @2013arXiv1310.3838G] then a horizontal transition is expected. Conversely, merging will produce a parallel upwards evolution along the \(M_{\rm dust}\)--SFR relation, perhaps leading to a subsequent starburst. We stress that the evolutionary models plotted in Figure 1 are for illustration and are not intended to account for all the data points being part of a single evolutionary sequence. Notably, the *Herschel* ETGs and passive spirals (red symbols) appear, on average, to be offset from the relation (blue points), with higher dust masses at a given SFR, or, equivalently, lower SFR at a given dust mass. Part of the effect may be due to their average higher masses, a selection effect in that they are *Herschel* detected, or morphological quenching as discussed above. Long-time sustained low star formation from a large gas reservoir appears unlikely to account for the full effect given they are early-type galaxies. It is interesting to note that the offsets of the *Herschel* ETGs and the SMGs from the main relation are reminiscent of the similar offsets of such galaxies from the main sequence of star formation, i.e., the \(M_\star\)--SFR relation. Possibly, the SMGs and the *Herschel* ETGs form a separate evolutionary sequence, characterized by a higher \(k\). As suggested by the models, we expect a population of star-bursting galaxies significantly below the relation. Because of the logarithmic scale and the short amount of time spent in this early phase, such galaxies may be rare. Examples include the low-metallicity low-redshift dwarf galaxy starbursts I Zw 18 and SBS 0035\(-\)`<!-- -->`{=html}052. At higher redshifts, entering the era of reionization, we expect most galaxies to have low dust content because of the limited time available since Big Bang and the onset of star formation. ALMA should uncover a significant population of very high redshift galaxies below the local relation. The \(z\sim 6.6\) galaxy 'Himiko' may be one such candidate. Given the heterogeneous data sets used, as well as the possible range of model parameters (initial mass, SFR, and IMF in particular) and evolutionary processes entering, one expects quite some scatter in the relation, as revealed here. More homogeneous samples would be needed to model evolutionary sequences in more detail. We thank Haley Gomez, Julie Wardlow, Sune Toft, Stefano Zibetti, Anna Gallazzi, and Darach Watson for discussions, and Elisabete da Cunha and Mark Swinbank for making their data points available in electronic form. The anonymous referee provided very insightful comments. C.G. was supported from the NASA Postdoctoral Program (NPP) and acknowledges funding provided by the Danish Agency for Science and Technology and Innovation. The Dark Cosmology Centre is funded by the Danish National Research Foundation.

{'timestamp': '2014-01-23T02:05:32', 'yymm': '1401', 'arxiv_id': '1401.5578', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5578'}

# Introduction Modern observational phenomena, such as dark energy and dark matter, are the great challenge for present cosmology, astrophysics and theoretical physics. Within the scope of standard models, a satisfactory explanation to these problems has not been offered yet. This forces the search of their solutions beyond the standard models, for example, by considering modified gravitational theories. One of the possible generalizations consists in consideration of nonlinear (with respect to the scalar curvature \(R\)) models \(f(R)\). Nonlinear models may arise either due to quantum fluctuations of matter fields including gravity, or as a result of compactification of extra spatial dimensions. Starting from the pioneering paper, the nonlinear theories of gravity \(f(R)\) have attracted a great deal of interest because these models can provide a natural mechanism of the early inflation. It was also realized that these models can explain the late-time acceleration of the Universe. This fact resulted in a new wave of papers devoted to this topic (see, e.g., the reviews ). The cosmological perturbation theory is very important for the current cosmological investigations of the large-scale structure. Thus, it would be interesting to make the corresponding cosmological perturbation analysis in nonlinear \(f(R)\) theories of gravity. In the hydrodynamical approach, such investigation was performed in a number of papers (see, e.g., Sec. 8 in the review and references therein). In particular, matter density perturbations in a class of viable cosmological \(f(R)\) models were studied in. We consider the Universe at the late stage of its evolution when galaxies and clusters of galaxies have already formed. At scales much larger than the characteristic distance between these inhomogeneities, the Universe is well described by the homogeneous and isotropic FRW metric. These scales are approximately 190 Mpc and larger. At these distances, the matter fields (e.g., cold dark matter) are well described by the hydrodynamical approach. However, at smaller scales the Universe is highly inhomogeneous, and we need to take into account the inhomogeneities in the form of galaxies, groups and clusters of galaxies. The peculiar velocities of these inhomogeneities are much less than the speed of light, and we can use the nonrelativistic approximation. This means that in equations for scalar perturbations we first neglect peculiar velocities and solve these equations with respect to scalar perturbation functions \(\Phi\) and \(\Psi\). The function \(\Phi\) represents the gravitational potential of the inhomogeneities. Then, we use the explicit expression for \(\Phi\) to describe the motion of inhomogeneities. Such mechanical approach is well known in astrophysics (see, e.g., ). We generalized it to the case of dynamical cosmological background. In the case of the linear model (i.e. the conventional \(\Lambda\)CDM model), we used this procedure to describe the mutual motion of galaxies and dwarf galaxies. Due to the great popularity of the nonlinear \(f(R)\) models, it is of interest to apply this scheme to them. However, first of all, we should show that nonlinear theories are compatible with the mechanical approach. In other words, we have to examine equations for scalar perturbations of the metrics in nonlinear \(f(R)\) gravity within the framework of the mechanical approach to show their integrability up to the required accuracy. This is the main aim of our paper. As a result, we demonstrate that considered in our paper nonlinear theories are compatible with the mechanical approach. We get the expressions for both \(\Phi\) and \(\Psi\) in different approximations. Moreover, the exact form of the gravitational potential \(\Phi\) gives a possibility to take into account both the effects of nonlinearity of the original model and the dynamics of the cosmological background. The explicit form of this function makes it possible to carry out analytical and numerical study of mutual motion of galaxies in nonlinear models. Therefore, our formulae can be used to analyze the large-scale structure dynamics in the late Universe for nonlinear f(R) models. This is the main result of our paper. The paper is structured as follows. In Sec. 2 we present the main background equations as well as the equations for scalar perturbations for an arbitrary \(f(R)\) model. Here the equations for scalar perturbations are written within the framework of the mechanical approach. In Sec. 3 we solve these equations in three approximations: the astrophysical approach, the large scalaron mass case and the quasi-static approximation. In all three cases we obtain the expressions for the scalar perturbation functions \(\Phi\) and \(\Psi\) up to the required accuracy. The main results are summarized in concluding Sec. 4. # Basic equations In this section we reproduce some known equations of the nonlinear \(f(R)\) gravitational model that we will use hereinafter. We follow mainly the review using the notation and the sign convention accepted in this paper. In \(f(R)\) gravity, the action reads S=d\^4xf(R) + S_m  , where \(f(R)\) is an arbitrary smooth function of the scalar curvature \(R\), \(S_m\) is the action of matter, \(\kappa^2=8\pi G_N\), and \(G_N\) is the Newtonian gravitational constant. The equation of motion corresponding to this action is (see, e.g., Eq. (2.4) in ) &&F(R)R\_-f(R)g\_-\_\_F(R) + g_F(R)\ &=&\^2 T\_  ,,1,2,3 . The trace of this equation gives 3F(R)+F(R)R-2f(R)=\^2 T . Here, \(F(R)=f'(R)\) and \(T=g^{\mu\nu}T_{\mu\nu}\). Besides, \(\square F = (1/\sqrt{-g})\partial_{\mu}(\sqrt{-g}g^{\mu\nu}\partial_{\nu}F)\). In what follows, the prime denotes the derivative with respect to the scalar curvature \(R\). In our paper we consider a special class of \(f(R)\) models which have solutions \(R_{\mathrm{dS}}\) of the equation F(R)R-2f(R)=0 . As it follows from Eq. , they are vacuum solutions (\(T=0\)) of this equation for which the Ricci scalar is constant (\(\square F(R)=0\)). Such solutions are called de Sitter points. According to, viable nonlinear models should have stable de Sitter points in the late Universe. We can expand the function \(f(R)\) in the vicinity of one of these points: f(R)&=&f(R\_)+f'(R\_)(R-R\_)+o(R-R\_)\ &=&-f(R\_)+ R + o(R-R\_) , where we used Eq. . Now, in order to have linear gravity at the late stage of the Universe evolution, without loss of generality we choose the parameters of the model in such a way that 2=1 f(R\_)= . Therefore, we get f(R)=-2+R +o(R-R\_)  , where \(\Lambda \equiv R_{\mathrm{dS}}/4\). The stability of these points was discussed in. Obviously, these models go asymptotically to the de Sitter space when \(R\to R_{\mathrm{dS}}\neq 0\) with a cosmological constant \(\Lambda=R_{\mathrm{dS}}/4\). This happens when the matter content becomes negligible with respect to \(\Lambda\) as in the late Friedman-Robertson-Walker (FRW) cosmology. We can also consider a zero solution \(R_{\mathrm{dS}}=0\) of Eq. . It is more correct to call this point a Minkowski one. Here, \(\Lambda =0\), and such models go asymptotically to the Minkowski space. In particular, three popular models, Starobinsky, Hu-Sawicki and MJWQ, have stable nonzero de Sitter points in future (approximately at the redshift \(z=-1\)). The explicit search for dS points in both future and past was considered in. It is worth noting that in papers the authors point to the oscillating behavior of the parameter of the equation of state near the value \(-1\) in the future. Moreover, the number of times of such oscillations can be infinite. In the case of the spatially flat background spacetime with the FRW metric ds\^2=g_dx\^dx\^=-dt\^2+a\^2(t) (dx\^2+dy\^2+dz\^2) and matter in the form of a perfect fluid with the energy-momentum tensor components \(\bar T^{\mu}_{\nu}=\mathrm{diag}(-\bar\rho,\bar P,\bar P,\bar P)\), Eq. results in the following system: 3FH\^2 = (FR-f)/2-3H + \^2 \|  and -2F= -H + \^2 (\|+ \|P) , where the bar denotes the homogeneous background quantities, the Hubble parameter \(H=\dot a/a\) (the dot everywhere denotes the derivative with respect to the synchronous time \(t\)) and the scalar curvature R=6(2H\^2 + ) . The perfect fluid satisfies the continuity equation + 3H(\|+ \|P)=0  , which for nonrelativistic matter with \(P=0\) has the solution \|= \|\_c/a\^3  , where \(\bar\rho_c=\const\) is the rest mass density in the comoving coordinates. Above, Eqs. - describe the homogeneous background. As we have written in the Introduction, we consider the Universe at late stages of its evolution when galaxies and clusters of galaxies have already formed and when the Universe is highly inhomogeneous inside the cell of uniformity which is approximately 190 Mpc in size. Obviously, these inhomogeneities perturb the homogeneous background. At scales larger than the cell of uniformity size, the matter fields (e.g., cold dark matter) are well described by the hydrodynamical approach. However, at smaller scales the mechanical approach looks more adequate. In the framework of the mechanical approach galaxies, dwarf galaxies and clusters of galaxies (composed of baryonic and dark matter) can be considered as separate compact objects. Moreover, at distances much greater than their characteristic sizes they can be described well as point-like matter sources with the rest mass density = \_i m_i\_i)\_c/a\^3  , where \({\bf{r}}_i\) is the radius-vector of the i-th gravitating mass in the comoving coordinates. This is the generalization of the well-known astrophysical approach to the case of dynamical cosmological background. Usually, the gravitational fields of these inhomogeneities are weak and their peculiar velocities are much less than the speed of light. All these inhomogeneities/fluctuations result in scalar perturbations of the FRW metric . In the conformal Newtonian (longitudinal) gauge, such perturbed metric is ds\^2=-(1+2)dt\^2+a\^2(1-2)(dx\^2+dy\^2+dz\^2)  , where the introduced scalar perturbations \(\Phi,\Psi \ll 1\). These functions of all spacetime coordinates, representing deviations of metric coefficients from their average/background values, may be associated with famous Bardeen's potentials under the made gauge choice. It is worth noting that smallness of these nonrelativistic gravitational potentials \(\Phi\) and \(\Psi\) and smallness of peculiar velocities are two independent conditions (e.g., for very light relativistic masses the gravitational potential can still remain small). Therefore, similar to the astrophysical approach described in (see §106), we split the investigation of galaxy dynamics in the late Universe into two steps. First, we neglect peculiar velocities and define the gravitational potential \(\Phi\). Then, we use this potential to determine dynamical behavior of galaxies. It gives us a possibility to take into account both the gravitational attraction between inhomogeneities and the global cosmological expansion of the Universe. For example, for the linear model \(f(R)=R\) this procedure was performed in. Our present paper is devoted to the first step in this program. In other words, we are going to define scalar perturbations \(\Phi,\Psi\) for the \(f(R)\) gravitational models. Under our assumptions and according to, these perturbations satisfy the following system of equations: &-& + 3H(H+) =\ &-& , H+ = (-H -)  , -F(-)=F  , && 3(H+H+) + 6H(H+) + 3H+\ &=& , &&+ 3H \--RF\ &=&\^2(P) + (3H+3+)\ &+&2F+ 3H-F , &&F=F'R,R=-2 . In these equations the function \(F\), its derivative \(F'\) and the scalar curvature \(R\) are unperturbed background quantities. Here \(\Delta\) is the Laplacian in the comoving coordinates. As a matter source, we consider dust-like matter. Therefore, \(\delta P =0\) and = -\|=(\_c-\|\_c)/a\^3  , where \(\bar \rho\) and \(\rho\) are defined in Eqs. and , respectively. It can be easily verified that in the linear case \(f(R)=R\ \Rightarrow\ F(R)=1\) this system of equations is reduced to Eqs. (2.18)-(2.20) in. # Astrophysical and cosmological approaches ## Astrophysical approach First, we consider Eqs. - in the astrophysical approach. This means that we neglect the time dependence of functions in these equations by setting all time derivatives equal to zero. It is supposed also that the background model is matter free, i.e. \(\bar\rho=0\). As we mentioned above, there are two types of vacuum background solutions of Eq. : de Sitter spacetime with \(R_{\mathrm{dS}}=12H^2=\const\neq 0\) and Minkowski spacetime with \(R=0,\ H=0\). However, the system of equations - was obtained for the FRW metric where we explicitly took into account the dependence of the scale factor \(a\) on time. Therefore, if we want to get the time independent astrophysical equations directly from -, we should also neglect the time dependence of \(a\), i.e. the background Hubble parameter \(H=0\). This means that the background solution is the Minkowski spacetime. This background is perturbed by dust-like matter with the rest mass density . Keeping in mind that \(\bar\rho=0\), we have \(\delta \rho = \rho\).  In the case of Minkowski spacetime background, dropping the time derivatives, Eqs. - in the astrophysical approach are reduced to the following system: -=-(F + \^2 )  , -F(-)=F  , =(-F + \^2 )  , -F= \^2-FR  , F=F'R,R=-2() . From and we obtain respectively &=&F +=R +  ,\ &=&-F+=-R+ , where the function \(\varphi\) satisfies the equation =\^2a\^3=\^2_c=\_c . Here, we took into consideration that in the astrophysical approach \(\delta\rho_c=\rho_c\) where \(\rho_c\) is defined by . It is worth noting that in the Poisson equation the Newtonian gravitational constant \(G_N\) is replaced by an effective one \(G_{\mathrm{eff}}=G_N/F\). Eq. follows directly from and therefore may be dropped, while from we get the following Helmholtz equation with respect to the scalaron function \(\delta R\): R-R =- \_c . On the other hand, it can be easily seen that the substitution of Eqs. and into results in the same Eq. . Therefore, in the case of Minkowski background, the mass of the scalaron squared is M\^2 =  . A similar formula (up to the evident substitution \(a=1\) and the zero background scalar curvature) for the mass squared can be found, e.g., in (see also Eq. (5.2) in the review ). ## Cosmological approach Now we want to take into consideration cosmological evolution. This means that background functions may depend on time. In this case it is hardly possible to solve the system - directly. Therefore, first, we study the case of the very large mass of the scalaron. It should be noted also that we investigate the Universe filled with nonrelativistic matter with the rest mass density \(\bar \rho \sim 1/a^3\). Hence, we will drop all terms which decrease (with increasing \(a\)) faster than \(1/a^3\). This is the accuracy of our approach. Within this approach, \(\delta \rho \sim 1/a^3\).  *Large scalaron mass case*  As we can see from , the limit of the large scalaron mass corresponds to \(F' \to 0\). Then, \(\delta F\) is also negligible (see ). Therefore, Eqs. - read &&- + 3H(H+)\ &=&- , H+ = (-)  , - , &&3(H+H+) + 6H(H+) + 3H+\ &=& , 0= (3H+3+)+2F+ 3H  , &-&R=3(H+H+) + 12H(H+)\ &+&+3 .From and we get ==  ,where the introduced function \(\varphi\) depends only on spatial coordinates. Substituting into , we obtain + =\^2 .As we mentioned above, neglecting relativistic matter in the late Universe, we have \(\delta\rho\sim1/a^3\). This approximation is getting better and better performed in the limit \(a\rightarrow+\infty\). We assume that this limit corresponds to the final stage of the Universe evolution. The similar limit with respect to the scalar curvature is \(R\rightarrow R_{\infty}\), where the value \(R_{\infty}\) is just finite. Then, from we immediately come to the condition F=+o(1)  ,where \(o(1)\) is any decreasing (with increasing \(a\)) function of \(a\). This condition holds at the considered late stage. One can also naively suppose that in the late Universe \(\dot F\sim1/a+o(1/a)\). However, as we will see below, this is wrong. Obviously, without loss of generality we can suppose that \(\mathrm{const}=1\). From the condition we get F=1+o(1) f=-2+R+o(R-R\_)  ,where \(\Lambda\) is the cosmological constant. Therefore, the limit of the large scalaron mass takes place for models which possess the asymptotic form . For example, \(R_{\infty}\) may correspond to the de Sitter point \(R_{\mathrm{dS}}\) in future (see Eq. ). As we have written in Sec. 2, all three popular models, Starobinsky, Hu-Sawicki and MJWQ, have such stable de Sitter points in future (approximately at the redshift \(z=-1\)). The condition of stability is \(0<R F'/F< 1\) (see, e.g., (4.80) in ). Since \(F\approx 1\), this condition reads \(0<R< 1/F'\) which is fulfilled for the de Sitter points in the above-mentioned models. The reason of it consists in the smallness of \(F'\). We now return to the remaining Eqs. - to show that they are satisfied within the considered accuracy. First, we study which after the substitution of and and some simple algebra takes the form H-(HF-) =0 . To estimate \(\dot F\) and \(\ddot F\), we take into account that in the limit \(R\to R_{\infty}\), \(F\approx 1\), \(H\approx \mathrm{const}\ \Rightarrow\ \dot H \approx 0\), and \(F'(R_{\infty})\) is some finite positive value. Then, \(\dot F=F'\dot R\sim F'(R_{\infty})\dot R\sim \dot T \sim d\left(1/a^3\right)/dt\sim H\left(1/a^3\right)\sim 1/a^3\) and \(\ddot F \sim \dot a/a^4\sim 1/a^3\). Therefore, the left hand side of Eq. is of the order \(o(1/a^3)\) and we can put it zero within the accuracy of our approach. Similarly, Eqs. and are satisfied within the considered accuracy. It can be also seen that the second term on the left hand side of Eq. is of the order \(O(1/a^7)\) and should be eliminated. Thus, in the case of the large enough scalaron mass we reproduce the linear cosmology from the nonlinear one, as it should be.  *Quasi-static approximation*  Now we do not want to assume a priori that the scalaron mass is large, i.e. \(F'\) can have arbitrary values. Hence, we will preserve the \(\delta F\) terms in Eqs. -. Moreover, we should keep the time derivatives in these equations. Such a system is very complicated for the direct integration. However, we can investigate it in the quasi-static approximation (see also Sec. 8.1 in ). According to this approximation, the spatial derivatives give the main contribution to Eqs. -. Therefore, first, we should solve \"astrophysical\" Eqs. -, and then check whether the found solutions satisfy (up to the adopted accuracy) the full system of equations. In other words, in the quasi-static approximation it is naturally supposed that the gravitational potentials (the functions \(\Phi,\,\Psi\)) are produced mainly by the spatial distribution of astrophysical/cosmological bodies. As we have seen, Eqs. - result in -. Now, we should keep in mind that we have the cosmological background. Moreover, we consider the late Universe which is not far from the de Sitter point \(R_{\mathrm{dS}}\) in future[^1]. This means that \(\delta \rho = \rho-\bar \rho\) in , all background quantities (e.g., \(F,\,F'\)) are calculated roughly speaking at \(R_{\mathrm{dS}}\) and the scalaron mass squared reads now M\^2 = (-R\_) . Let us consider now Eq. with the mass squared . Taking into account that now \(\delta\rho_c=\rho_c-\bar\rho_c\), we can rewrite this equation as follows: -M\^2 + \_i m_i\_i)=0  , where = R + \|\_c=R + \|\_c . Eq. demonstrates that we can apply the principle of superposition solving this Helmholtz equation for one gravitating mass \(m_i\). Then the general solution for a full system is the sum over all gravitating masses. As boundary conditions, we require for each gravitating mass the behavior \(\widetilde{\delta R}\sim 1/r\) at small distances \(r\) and \(\widetilde{\delta R}\to 0\) for \(r\to\infty\). Taking all these remarks into consideration, we obtain for a full system R&=&\_i \|**r-**r****\_i\|\ &-&\|\_c  . It is worth noting that averaging over the whole comoving spatial volume \(V\) gives the zero value \(\overline{\delta R}=0\). Really, since \(\sum_im_i/V=\bar\rho_c\), &=&\_VRdV=\ &&\_im_i-\|\_c=0 .This result is reasonable because the rest mass density fluctuation \(\delta\rho\), representing the source of the metric and scalar curvature fluctuations \(\Phi,\,\Psi\) and \(\delta R\), has a zero average value \(\overline{\delta\rho}=0\). Consequently, all enumerated quantities should also have zero average values: \(\bar\Phi=\bar\Psi=0\) and \(\overline{\delta R}=0\), in agreement with . From Eq. we get the scalar perturbation functions \(\Psi\) and \(\Phi\) in the following form: &=&+  ,\ [\[3.38\]]{#3.38 label="3.38"} &=&-+ , where \(\varphi\) satisfies Eq. with \(\delta\rho\) in the form (i.e. \(\bar\rho_c\neq 0\)). Obviously, when \(F'\to 0\), \(M\to \infty\), and we have \(\exp\left(-M {|\bf{r}-\bf{r}}_i|\right)/{|\bf{r}-\bf{r}}_i|\to 4\pi\delta({\bf r}-{\bf r}_i)/M^2\), so the expression in the square brackets in and is equal to \(\kappa^2\delta\rho_c/\left[(F-F'R_{\mathrm{dS}})a^3\right]\). Therefore, in the considered limit \(F'\to 0\) we reproduce the scalar perturbations \(\Phi,\,\Psi\) from the previous large scalaron mass case, as it certainly should be. Thus, neglecting for a moment the influence of the cosmological background, but without neglecting the scalaron's contribution, we have found the scalar perturbations. They represent the mix of the standard potential \(\varphi/a\) (see the linear case ) and the additional Yukawa term which follows from the nonlinearity. Now we should check that these solutions satisfy the full system -. To do it, we substitute , and into this system of equations. Obviously, the spatial derivatives disappear. Keeping in mind this fact, the system - is reduced to the following equations: &&3H(H+) =- , H+ = (-H -)  , && 3(H+H+) + 6H(H+) + 3H=\ &=& , + 3H = (3H+3+)+2F+ 3H  , &&F=F'R,R_R=-2 .Here, the term \(-(R/3)\delta F\) (the term \((F'/F)R_{\mathrm{dS}}\delta R\)) in the left hand side of () disappears (appears) due to redefinition of the scalaron mass squared . All terms in , and depend on time, and therefore may contribute to Eqs. -. As we wrote above, according to our nonrelativistic approach, we neglect the terms of the order \(o(1/a^3)\). On the other hand, exponential functions decrease faster than any power function. Moreover, we can write the exponential term in as follows: \_i , where we introduced the physical distance \(r_{\mathrm{ph}} = a r\). It is well known that astrophysical tests impose strong restrictions on the nonlinearity (the local gravity tests impose even stronger constraints ). According to these constraints, should be small at the astrophysical scales. Consequently, on the cosmological scales it will be even much smaller. So, we will not take into account the exponential terms in the above equations. However, in , and , we have also \(1/a^3\) and \(1/a\) terms which we should examine. Before performing this, it should be recalled that we consider the late Universe which is rather close to the de Sitter point. Therefore, as we already noted in the previous subsection, \(F\approx 1\), \(H\approx \mathrm{const}\ \Rightarrow\ \dot H \approx 0,\, R_{\mathrm{dS}}=12 H^2\) and \(F'(R_{\mathrm{dS}})\) is some finite positive value. Additionally, \(\dot F,\ddot F,\dot F' \sim 1/a^3\). Hence, all terms of the form of \(\dot F,\ddot F,\dot F' \; \times \; \Phi,\Psi,\dot \Phi, \dot\Psi\) are of the order \(o(1/a^3)\) and should be dropped. In other words, the functions \(F\) and \(F'\) can be considered as time independent. First, let us consider the terms \(\Psi =\Phi = \varphi/a\) in Eqs. and and substitute them into Eqs. -. Such \(1/a\) term is absent in \(\delta R\). So, we should put \(\delta R=0\), \(\delta F=0\). Obviously, this is the linear theory case. It can be easily seen that all equations are satisfied. Indeed, the functions \(\Phi\) and \(\Psi\) are included in Eqs. - and (Eq. is satisfied identically) in combinations \(H\Phi+\dot\Psi\) and \(H\dot \Phi+\ddot\Psi\) which are equal to zero. Now, we study the terms \(\sim 1/a^3\), i.e. R&=&-  ,\ &=&-  ,\ &=& . Let us examine, for example, Eq. . Keeping in mind that \(\delta F=F'\delta R\), one can easily get &&12H\^2\ &=& 12H\^2+o(1/a\^3) . Therefore, the terms \(\sim 1/a^3\) exactly cancel each other, and this equation is satisfied up to the adopted accuracy \(o(1/a^3)\). One can easily show that the remaining Eqs. - are fulfilled with the same accuracy. Thus, we have proved that the scalar perturbation functions \(\Psi\) and \(\Phi\) in the form and satisfy the system of Eqs. - with the required accuracy. Both of these functions contain the nonlinearity function \(F\) and the scale factor \(a\). Therefore, both the effects of nonlinearity and the dynamics of the cosmological background are taken into account. The function \(\Phi\) corresponds to the gravitational potential of the system of inhomogeneities. Hence, we can study the dynamical behavior of the inhomogeneities (e.g., galaxies and dwarf galaxies) including into consideration their gravitational attraction and cosmological expansion, and also taking into account the effects of nonlinearity. For example, the nonrelativistic Lagrange function for a test body of the mass \(m\) in the gravitational field described by the metric has the form (see for details): L -m+   ,\^2=x\^2 + y\^2 + z\^2 . We can use this Lagrange function for analytical and numerical study of mutual motion of galaxies. In the case of the linear theory, such investigation was performed, e.g., in. With the help of the explicit expression we can perform now similar numerical and analytical investigations for different \(f(R)\) models. # Conclusion In our paper we have studied scalar perturbations of the metric in nonlinear \(f(R)\) gravity. The Universe has been considered at the late stage of its evolution and at scales much less than the cell of uniformity size which is approximately 190 Mpc. At such distances, our Universe is highly inhomogeneous, and the averaged hydrodynamic approach does not work. Here, the mechanical approach is more adequate. Therefore, we have used the mechanical approach to investigate the scalar perturbations in nonlinear theories. We have considered a class of viable \(f(R)\) models which have de Sitter points in future with respect to the present moment. The main objective of this paper was to find explicit expressions for \(\Phi\) and \(\Psi\) in the framework of nonlinear \(f(R)\) models. Unfortunately, in the case of nonlinearity the system of equations for scalar perturbations is very complicated. It is hardly possible to solve it directly. Therefore, we have considered the following approximations: the astrophysical approach, the large scalaron mass case and the quasi-static approximation. In all three cases we found the explicit expressions for the scalar perturbation functions \(\Phi\) and \(\Psi\) up to the required accuracy. The latter means that, because we consider nonrelativistic matter with the averaged rest mass density \(\bar\rho \sim 1/a^3\), all quantities in the cosmological approximation are also calculated up to the corresponding orders of \(1/a\). It should be also noted that in the cosmological approach our consideration is valid for nonlinear models where functions \(f(R)\) have the stable de Sitter points \(R_{\mathrm{dS}}\) in future with respect to the present time, and the closer to \(R_{\mathrm{dS}}\) we are, the more correct our approximation is. All three popular models, Starobinsky, Hu-Sawicki and MJWQ (see also ) have such stable de Sitter points in future (approximately at the redshift \(z=-1\)). The quasi-static approximation is of most interest from the point of view of the large-scale structure investigations. Here the gravitational potential \(\Phi\) contains both the nonlinearity function \(F\) and the scale factor \(a\). Hence, we can study the dynamical behavior of the inhomogeneities (e.g., galaxies and dwarf galaxies) including into consideration their gravitational attraction and the cosmological expansion, and also taking into account the effects of nonlinearity. All this makes it possible to carry out the numerical and analytical analysis of the large-scale structure dynamics in the late Universe for nonlinear \(f(R)\) models.

{'timestamp': '2014-09-04T02:06:43', 'yymm': '1401', 'arxiv_id': '1401.5410', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5410'}

# Introduction It is well known that in conventional quantum field theory the LSZ reduction formula allows effective calculation of the scattering amplitudes from the Green functions . In the present paper we analyze the applicability of this formula in the framework of noncommutative quantum field theory (NCQFT). We will consider the case of a neutral scalar field in many-dimensional theory with space-space noncommutativity, so that the temporal variable commutes with the spatial ones. Let us consider the general case of \(\sol{d}\)-invariant theory with \(d+1\) commutative coordinates (including time) and an arbitrary even number \(l\) of noncommutative ones. The commutation relations between \(l\) noncommutative coordinates have the form \[\label{mnc} \left[\hat x^i,\,\hat x^j\right]=i\theta^{ij},\quad i,\,j=1,\,\ldots,\,l,\] where \(\theta^{ij}\) ---real antisymmetric \(l\times l\) matrix. As we said, the rest \((d+1)\) variables commute with each other and all \(\hat x^j\) from . In order to formulate the theory in commutative space-time, we use the Weyl ordered symbol  \(\varphi(x)\) of the noncommutative field operator \(\Phi(\hat x)\): \[\varphi(x)=\frac1{(2\pi)^l}\int d^lk\int \textup{Tr}\,e^{ik(x-\hat x)}\Phi(\hat x),\] and the corresponding multiplication law \(\varphi_1\star\varphi_2\) between the two symbols in the Weyl--Moyal--Groenewold form: \[\label{mp} (\varphi_1\star\varphi_2)(x)=\left[e^{\frac{i}2\theta^{\mu\nu}\partial'_{\mu}\partial''_{\nu}}\varphi_1(x')\varphi_2(x'')\right]_{x'=x''=x}.\] Relation  admits further generalization: for the symbols (fields) taken at different points one can define twisted tensor product  \[\label{ttp} \begin{split} \varphi (x_1) \star \ldots \star \varphi (x_n) = \prod_{a<b} \,&\exp{\left ({\frac{i}{2} \, \theta^{\mu\nu} \, \frac{ {\partial}}{\partial x^{\mu}_a} \, \frac{ {\partial}}{\partial x^{\nu}_b}} \right)} \,\varphi (x_1) \ldots \varphi (x_n),\\ &a, b = 1,2, \ldots n. \end{split}\] Thus the algebra of field operators is deformed, and it is not clear whether one can apply the standard LSZ formula for the noncommutative fields or not. # Commutation Relations for Creation and Annihilation Operators in NCQFT {#Weylrep} As in conventional field theory, a free real scalar field in NCQFT admits a normal mode expansion: \[\label{decomp} \begin{split} \varphi(x)=\varphi^+&(x)+\varphi^-(x),\\ \varphi^{\pm}(x)=\frac1{(2\pi)^{(d+l)/2}}\int&\,\frac{d\vec k}{\sqrt{2\omega(\vec k)}}\left.\,e^{\pm ikx}\,a^{\pm}(\vec k)\right|_{k^0=\omega(\vec k)}, \end{split}\] where \(\omega(\vec k)=\sqrt{\vec{k}^2+m^2}\), \(\vec{k}^2=\vec{k_c}^2+\vec{k}_{nc}^2\), \(\vec{k_c}\)---commutative part of the \((d+l)\)-dimensional vector \(\vec{k}\), \(\vec{k}_{nc}\)---noncommutative part of the same vector. Let us obtain commutation relations for the creation and annihilation operators \(a^{\pm}\) directly from the assumption that the canonical quantization of a real scalar field in NCQFT is defined by the relations \[\label{starcom} \begin{split} \left.[\varphi(x)\star\partial_0\varphi(y)]\right|_{x^0=y^0}&=i\delta(\vec x-\vec y),\\ \left.[\varphi(x)\star\varphi(y)]\right|_{x^0=y^0}=0&,\quad\left.[\partial_0\varphi(x)\star\partial_0\varphi(y)]\right|_{x^0=y^0}=0. \end{split}\] Performing an inverse Fourier transform one can get the expression for \(a^{\pm}\) from : \[a^{\pm}(\vec k)=\frac1{(2\pi)^{(d+l)/2}}\int\,d\vec x\,e^{\mp ikx}\,\left.\left[\sqrt{\frac{k_0}{2}}\varphi(x)\mp\frac{i}{\sqrt{2k_0}}\partial_0\varphi(x)\right]\right|_{k_0=\omega(\vec k)}.\] Let us take the operator product \(a^-(\vec k)a^+(\vec q)\) and multiply it by \(e^{\frac i2\theta^{\mu\nu} k_{\mu}q_{\nu}}=e^{\frac i2\theta^{\mu\nu} ik_{\mu}(-i)q_{\nu}}\). Expanding the phase factor in a series, we get \[\begin{split} e&^{\frac i2\theta^{\mu\nu} ik_{\mu}(-i)q_{\nu}}\,a^-(\vec k)a^+(\vec q)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\,\frac{(i/2)^n}{n!}\,\left(\theta^{\mu\nu} ik_{\mu} (-i)q_{\nu}\right)^na^-(\vec k)a^+(\vec q)=\\ &=\frac1{(2\pi)^{(d+l)}}\,\int\int\,d\vec x \,d\vec y\,\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\,\frac{(i/2)^n}{n!}\,\left(\theta^{\mu\nu} ik_{\mu} (-i)q_{\nu}\right)^n\,e^{ikx}\,e^{-iqy}\times\\ &\quad\quad\quad\times\left(\sqrt{\frac{k_0}{2}}\varphi(x)+\frac{i}{\sqrt{2k_0}}\partial_0\varphi(x)\right)\left(\sqrt{\frac{q_0}{2}}\varphi(y)-\frac{i}{\sqrt{2q_0}}\partial_0\varphi(y)\right). \end{split}\] Next, let us replace momenta \(k\) and \(q\) with the derivatives, using the relation \[(ik_{\mu}(-i)q_{\nu})^n\,e^{ikx}\,e^{-iqy}=\left(\partial_{\mu}\partial_{\nu}\right)^n\,e^{ikx}\,e^{-iqy},\] and perform integration by parts, so that the derivatives act on the field \(\varphi\) in each term of the series. Thus we obtain \(\star\)-product of the field operators: \[\label{et1} \begin{split} &e^{\frac i2\theta^{\mu\nu} k_{\mu}q_{\nu}}\,a^-(\vec k)a^+(\vec q)=\frac1{(2\pi)^{(d+l)}}\,\int\int\,d\vec x \,d\vec y\,e^{ikx}\,e^{-iqy}\times\\ &\times\left(\sqrt{\frac{k_0}{2}}\varphi(x)+\frac{i}{\sqrt{2k_0}}\partial_0\varphi(x)\right)\star\left.\left(\sqrt{\frac{q_0}{2}}\varphi(y)-\frac{i}{\sqrt{2q_0}}\partial_0\varphi(y)\right)\right|_{k_0=\omega(\vec k),\,q_0=\omega(\vec q)}. \end{split}\] Similarly, \[\label{et2} \begin{split} &e^{\frac i2\theta^{\mu\nu} \qmk_{\nu}}\,a^+(\vec q)a^-(\vec k)=\frac1{(2\pi)^{(d+l)}}\,\int\int\,d\vec x \,d\vec y\,e^{ikx}\,e^{-iqy}\times\\ &\times\left(\sqrt{\frac{q_0}{2}}\varphi(y)-\frac{i}{\sqrt{2q_0}}\partial_0\varphi(y)\right)\star\left.\left(\sqrt{\frac{k_0}{2}}\varphi(x)+\frac{i}{\sqrt{2k_0}}\partial_0\varphi(x)\right)\right|_{k_0=\omega(\vec k),\,q_0=\omega(\vec q)}. \end{split}\] Now, taking the fields \(\varphi(x)\) and \(\varphi(y)\) at equal moments of time \(x^0=y^0\) and subtracting  from , with the use of  we obtain: \[e^{\frac i2\theta^{\mu\nu} k_{\mu}q_{\nu}}\,a^-(\vec k)a^+(\vec q)-e^{\frac i2\theta^{\mu\nu} \qmk_{\nu}}\,a^+(\vec q)a^-(\vec k)=\delta(\vec k-\vec q),\] or, in a more convenient form: \[\label{acom1} a^-(\vec k)a^+(\vec q)=e^{-i\theta^{\mu\nu} k_{\mu}q_{\nu}}\,a^+(\vec q)a^-(\vec k)+e^{-\frac i2\theta^{\mu\nu} k_{\mu}q_{\nu}}\,\delta(\vec k-\vec q).\] In the same way we get \[\label{acom2} a^{\pm}(\vec k)a^{\pm}(\vec q)=e^{i\theta^{\mu\nu} k_{\mu}q_{\nu}}\,a^{\pm}(\vec q)a^{\pm}(\vec k).\] Commutation relations  and  are equivalent to the ones obtained in  from general group-theoretical considerations involving the twisted Poincaré symmetry. # Analogue of the LSZ reduction formula for space-space NCQFT In  it was proposed that the expression for the noncommutative Wightman functions has the following form: \[\label{ncW} W_{\star}(x_1,\ldots,\,x_n)=\langle 0|\starp{1}{n}|0\rangle,\] where \(\star\)-product of fields taken at independent points is given by . In accordance with  we suppose that the noncommutative Green functions are \[\label{GrF} G_{\star}\] where we defined time-ordered \(\star\)-product of fields as straightforward generalization of the usual \(T\)-product: \[\begin{split} T(\varphi_1(x_1)\star\ldots\star\varphi_n(x_n))&=\varphi_{\sigma_1}(x_{\sigma_1})\star\ldots\star\varphi_{\sigma_n}(x_{\sigma_n}),\\ x_{\sigma_1}^0>x_{\sigma_2}^0&>\ldots>x_{\sigma_n}^0. \end{split}\] Below we extend the classical proof of the LSZ formula  to the case of space-space NCQFT. Let us single out the variable \(x_1\) and consider the expression \[\limred{1}\,(p_1^2-m^2)\int dx_1^0\,d\vec x_1\,e^{-ip_1x_1}\Tgr{1}{n}.\] Dividing integration over \(dx_1^0\) into three parts \[\label{tpart} \int\,(\ldots)\,dx_1^0=\int_{-\infty}^{-\tau}\,(\ldots)\,dx_1^0+\int_{-\tau}^{\tau}\,(\ldots)\,dx_1^0+\int_{\tau}^{+\infty}\,(\ldots)\,dx_1^0,\] we denote the summands as \(I_1(\tau)\), \(I_2(\tau)\), and \(I_3(\tau)\) respectively. Using expression \((p_1^2-m^2)e^{-ip_1x_1}=(\square_1-m^2)e^{-ip_1x_1}\) and performing integration by parts, we get: \[\label{redmain} \begin{split} &I_1(\tau)=\int\,d\vec x_1\,e^{i\vec p_1\vec x_1+i\omega(\vec p_1)\tau}\langle 0|\Tstar{2}{n}\star\\ \star(i&\omp{1}-\frac{\partial}{\partial\tau})\varphi(-\tau,\,\vec x_1)|0\rangle-\int_{-\infty}^{-\tau}\,dx_1^0\,\int\,d\vec x_1\,e^{i\vec p_1\vec x_1-i\omega(\vec p_1)x_1^0}\times\\ &\quad\quad\quad\times\langle 0|\Tstar{2}{n}\star(\square_1-m^2)\varphi(x_1)|0\rangle. \end{split}\] Here \(\square_1\equiv\frac{\partial^2}{\partial (x_1^1)^2}+\frac{\partial^2}{\partial (x_1^2)^2}+\frac{\partial^2}{\partial (x_1^3)^2}-\frac{\partial^2}{\partial (x_1^0)^2}\), and \(\tau\) is taken sufficiently large so that the permutation of \(\varphi(x_1)\) to the last position on the right is possible. Next, we use the Fourier-expression for \(\varphi(-\tau,\,\vec x_1)\): \[\label{specred} \varphi(-\tau,\,\vec x_1)=\frac1{(2\pi)^{(d+l)/2}}\int\,dk_0\,d\vec k\,e^{-ik_0\tau}\,e^{-i\vec k\vec x_1}\tilde{\varphi}(k).\] All derivatives in the \(\star\)-product will act on the factor \(e^{-i\vec k\vec x_1}\) in the Fourier expansion of \(\varphi(x_1)\). Therefore, additional factor \(N(k_{nc})\) will appear. Note that \(N(k_{nc})\) depends only on the noncommutative part of \(\vec k\). Let us also take into account the asymptotic representation for the field \(\varphi\): \[\lim\limits_{t\to-\infty}\int\,dk_0\,e^{it(k_0-\omega(\vec k))}\tilde{\varphi}(k)=\frac1{\sqrt{2\omega(\vec k)}}a^+_{in}(\vec k).\] Taking the limit \(\tau\to\infty\), we obtain: \[\begin{split} &I_1=\lim\limits_{\tau\to\infty}I_1(\tau)=i(2\pi)^{(d+l)/2}\int\,dk_0\,(k_0+\omp{1})\delta(k_0-\omp{1})\times\\ \times&\langle 0|\Tstar{2}{n}N(p_{1,\,nc})\frac{a^+_{in}(\vec p_1)}{\sqrt{2\omp{1}}}|0\rangle=\\ =i&(2\pi)^{(d+l)/2}\sqrt{2\omp{1}}N(p_{1,\,nc})\langle 0|\Tstar{2}{n}a^+_{in}(\vec p_1)|0\rangle. \end{split}\] In this limit the second term of the expression  is equal to null. Similar calculations for \(I_3(\tau)\) will give: \[\label{i3red} I_3=i(2\pi)^{(d+l)/2}\sqrt{2\omp{1}}N(p_{1,\,nc})\langle 0| a^+_{out}(\vec p_1)\Tstar{2}{n}|0\rangle=0.\] As to the second summand in , \(I_2(\tau)\) can be presented as \[\begin{split} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\,&dx_1^0\,e^{-ip_1^0x_1^0}\,\chi(x_1^0,\,\tau)\,F(x_1),\\ &\chi(x_1^0,\,\tau)=\begin{cases} 1,\quad |x_1^0|\leqslant\tau;\\ 0,\quad |x_1^0|>\tau. \end{cases} \end{split}\] The integrand contains a generalized function with compact support, so its Fourier-transform is a smooth function and doesn't have a pole. For this reason \[\limred{1}\,(p_1^2-m^2)\int_{-\tau}^{\tau} dx_1^0\,\int\,d\vec x_1\,e^{-ip_1x_1}\Tgr{1}{n}=0.\] Following similar limiting procedure over \(x_1\) and \(x_2\) consecutively, we obtain \[\begin{split} &\limred{2}\limred{1}(p_2^2-m^2)(p_1^2-m^2)\int\,dx_1\,\int\,dx_2\,e^{-ip_2x_2-ip_1x_1}\times\\ \times&\Tgr{1}{n}=\left[i(2\pi)^{(d+l)/2}\right]^2\sqrt{2\omp{1}}\sqrt{2\omp{2}}\times\\ \times & N(p_{2,\,nc})N(p_{1,\,nc})\langle 0|\Tstar{3}{n}a^+_{in}(\vec p_2)a^+_{in}(\vec p_1)|0\rangle. \end{split}\] Now let us replace the secong procedure (over \(x_2\)) with the one corresponding to transition to the bottom sheet of the mass hyperboloid, that is \(\lim\limits_{p_2^0\to-\omp{2}}(p_2^2-m^2)\). Making use of the asymptotic representation \[\lim\limits_{t\to \pm\infty}\int\,dk_0\,e^{it(k_0+\omega(\vec k))}\tilde{\varphi}(k)=\frac1{\sqrt{2\omega(\vec k)}}a^-_{in(out)}(-\vec k),\] we obtain: \[\label{finlim} \begin{split} &\lim\limits_{p_2^0\to-\omp{2}}\limred{1}(p_2^2-m^2)(p_1^2-m^2)\int\,dx_1\,\int\,dx_2\,e^{-ip_2x_2-ip_1x_1}\times\\ \times&\Tgr{1}{n}= \left(i(2\pi)^{(d+l)/2}\right)^2\sqrt{2\omp{1}}\sqrt{2\omp{2}}\times\\ \times &[N(p_{2,\,nc})N(p_{1,\,nc})\langle 0| a_{out}^-(-\vec p_2)\Tstar{3}{n}a_{in}^+(\vec p_1)|0\rangle-\\-&\tilde N(p_{2,\,nc})\tilde N(p_{1,\,nc})\langle 0| \Tstar{3}{n}a^-_{in}(-\vec p_2)a^+_{in}(\vec p_1)|0\rangle]. \end{split}\] The first term here is the contribution of \(I_3(\tau)\), which is not equal to zero in this limit. Let us make the substitution \(\vec p_2\to-\vec p_2\). We consider the scattering processes in which \(\vec p_1\)---incoming momentum, \(\vec p_2\)---outcoming momentum, and \(\vec p_1\ne\vec p_2\). In accordance with  we can commute \(a^-_{in}(\vec p_2)\) and \(a^+_{in}(\vec p_1)\) in the second term of  so that \(a^-_{in}(\vec p_2)\) can act on the vacuum state and give null. We can repeat the above-mentioned procedure \(n\) times---until nothing is left under the time-ordered \(\star\)-product. Now the additional factor \(N(p_{1,\,nc})\times\ldots\times N(p_{n,\,nc})\) can be expressed in explicit form: each derivative \(\partial_{\mu}\) in  should be replaced with \(ip_{\mu}\), and we have: \[\label{dist} \begin{split} N(p_{1,\,nc})\times\ldots\times N(p_{n,\,nc})=&\exp\left.\left[-\frac i2\, \theta_{\mu\nu}\sum_{a<b}\,p^{\mu}_{a}p^{\nu}_{b}\right]\right|_{-p_{out}},\\ & a,\,b=1,\,\ldots,\,n, \end{split}\] where \(\left.\right|_{-p_{out}}\) means that outcoming momenta should be taken with the minus sign (as the result of the substitution \(\vec p\to-\vec p\) we made earlier). The final expression for the scattering amplitude: \[\label{LSZnc} \begin{split} &\langle 0| a_{out}^-(\vec p_1)\,\ldots\,a_{out}^-(\vec p_k)\,a_{in}^+(\vec p_{k+1})\,\ldots\,a_{in}^+(\vec p_{n})|0\rangle=\left[\frac1{i(2\pi)^{(d+l)/2}}\right]^n\times\\ \times &\,\exp\left.\left[\frac i2\, \theta_{\mu\nu}\sum_{a<b}\,p^{\mu}_{a}p^{\nu}_{b}\right]\right|_{-p_{out}}\,\prod_{j=1}^{n}\,\frac{p_j^2-m^2}{\sqrt{2\omp{j}}}\,G_{\star}(-p_1,\,\ldots,\,-p_k,\,p_n,\,\ldots,\,p_{k+1}), \end{split}\] where \(G_{\star}(p_1,\,\ldots,\,p_n)\)---Fourier transform of the noncommutative Green function: \[\label{Fourie} G_{\star}(p_1,\,\ldots,\,p_n)=\int\,dx_1\ldots dx_n\,\exp\left[-i\sum_{j=1}^{n}\,p_jx_j\right]\,G_{\star}(x_1,\,\ldots,\,x_n).\] Relation  is a noncommutative analogue of the LSZ reduction formula. This result corresponds to the one obtained in , authors of which didn't use the \(\star\)-product between the fields taken at different points and considered the Green functions with the usual time-ordered product of noncommutative fields. The difference between the two results is the additional phase-factor  due to the chosen form of the Green function . # Consequences Now we can extend to NCQFT the considerations that were originally proposed in  for the case of commutative theory. Suppose that we have two noncommutative \(\sol{d}\)-invariant theories on Hilbert spaces \(\mathcal H_1\) and \(\mathcal H_2\) respectively, related by a unitary transformation. Let \(\varphi_1\) and \(\varphi_2\) be two irreducible sets of field operators defined in \(\mathcal H_1\) and \(\mathcal H_2\). Let \(< p'_1,\ldots,\,p'_n | p_1,\dots,\, p_m >_{i},\,i=1,2\) be inelastic scattering amplitudes of the process \(m \to n\) for the fields \(\varphi_1\) and \(\varphi_2\) respectively. In accordance with the reduction formula  \[\label{red} \begin{split} &< p'_1,\ldots,\,p'_n | p_1,\dots,\, p_m >_{i} \,\sim\\ \sim\int \,d\,x_1 \ldots d\,x_{n+m} \, &\exp\{i \, (-p_1 \,x_1-\ldots-p_m \,x_m+p'_1 \,x_{m+1} + \ldots + p'_n \,x_{n+m})\}\times\\ \times &\prod_{j =1} ^{n+m} \, (\square_{j}-m ^{2}) \, \langle 0| T(\varphi_{i} \,(x_1)\star \, \ldots \,\star \varphi_{i} \, (x_{n+m})) |0\rangle,\\ &\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad i=1,\,2. \end{split}\] Let us also take into account the results obtained for the generalized Haag's theorem in the context of noncommutative theory . Namely, it was shown that in two \(\sol{d}\)-invariant theories, related by a unitary transformation, the two-, three, ..., \(d+1\)-point Wightman functions coincide: \[\label{wicoi} \begin{split} \langle 0| \varphi_{1} \,(x_1)\star \, \ldots \,\star \varphi_{1} \, (x_{s}) |0\rangle&=\langle 0| \varphi_{2} \,(x_1)\star \, \ldots \,\star \varphi_{2} \, (x_{s}) |0\rangle,\\ 2\leqslant& s\leqslant d+1. \end{split}\] From  and  it follows that the amplitudes \(< p'_1,\ldots,\,p'_n | p_1,\dots,\, p_m >_1\) and \(< p'_1,\ldots,\,p'_n | p_1,\dots,\, p_m >_2\) coincide in the two theories if \[m+n\leqslant d+1.\]

{'timestamp': '2014-01-23T02:10:59', 'yymm': '1401', 'arxiv_id': '1401.5739', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5739'}

# Introduction Einstein's theory of general relativity predicts gravitational waves (GWs) . The existence of GWs was first confirmed by the observation of decay in the orbital period of the Hulse-Taylor binary pulsar system (PSR B1913+16) . Recently a very strong claim of detection of imprints of primordial GWs on Cosmic Microwave Background polarisation was made . While "direct" detection of GWs has not been possible yet, the first generation ground based Laser Interferometric detectors, LIGO , Virgo , GEO600  and TAMA300 , have demonstrated the capability to measure strain signal of the order \(10^{-23}\). However, the second generation detectors, which are currently being installed , will have ten times greater sensitivity and will cover a broader frequency spectrum. This will enable the detectors to observe at least three orders of magnitude more volume, thereby enhancing the chances of detection from *few percent level to close to unity* in the next few years. Sources of GWs can be broadly classified in three categories based on their duration and phase coherence: 1. Burst sources: Short duration sources with modelled (e.g., compact binary coalescence) or unmodelled (e.g., supernovae) phase evolution. 2. Continuous sources: long duration sources *with* phase coherence (e.g., spinning neutron stars). 3. Stochastic Background: created by a collection of unresolved and independent sources *without* phase coherence (e.g., coalescing binaries, millisecond pulsars in a galaxy cluster). Coalescing compact binary stars are the most promising sources of GWs, as the waveform from these sources can be modelled to a very high degree of accuracy, which makes it possible to apply the techniques of matched filtering for digging out signal from noisy data from the detectors. However, GW astronomy promises a much broader spectrum of sources and many, if not most, of these waveforms will not be known a priori. The stochastic gravitational wave background (SGWB), by definition, is one such type of sources. Different SGWBs are expected to be created from early universe phenomena  as well as from collection of astrophysical sources in the older low redshift universe. Here we only consider the astrophysical background, which can be generated by an incoherent superposition of short and long duration sources. These sources can be stochastic either in the time domain or in the frequency domain. In the time domain it can appear as pop-corn noise, a large set of events non-uniformly distributed over a certain interval of time, e.g., a population of supernovae, rotating neutron stars (including pulsars, magnetars and gravitars), binary super-massive black holes in a galaxy cluster . In the frequency domain the background can be created by a "forest of emission lines", narrow or broad, whose exact frequencies are not known, but the distribution can be modelled. For instance, a population of millisecond pulsars in a cluster of galaxies can create such a background . Detection of these astrophysical SGWBs can provide collective information about the constituent sources which are not accessible by conventional electro-magnetic (EM) observations. In particular, average physical properties of such sources, such as the mass asymmetry of neutron stars, the equation of state, the population distribution etc. can be probed via SGWB observations. The best strategy to search for stochastic signals is by cross-correlating signals from different detectors. Over the last three decades algorithms have been developed and implemented to search for isotropic and different kinds of anisotropic SGWBs . Further, the expected signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) from optimized searches for anisotropic SGWBs were computed. However, the relative strengths of the expected isotropic and anisotropic backgrounds, based on the current knowledge of astronomy, and the corresponding relative SNRs, have not been studied in literature. Such a study would in turn provide a firm justification for performing (or not performing) dedicated searches for different isotropic and anisotropic backgrounds. The picture of the universe that we get from EM astronomy shows that the nearby universe is highly anisotropic, while at large scales it is fairly isotropic. Hence, the true background will contain an isotropic as well as an anisotropic component. Our first task will be to compare their relative strengths. In the analysis of data from GW detectors, the searches for isotropic SGWBs are motivated from the fact that the primordial SGWB is statistically isotropic (though different models for power spectral densities are still needed to search for different astrophysical sources which create the background). An anisotropic SGWB search will be justified in a situation provided *either* of the following criterion is satisfied: 1. the anisotropic search can confidently probe the anisotropy, i.e., the search should be able to clearly distinguish the anisotropic component from the isotropic part; 2. the (optimal) anisotropic search has a significantly large SNR as compared to the (suboptimal) isotropic search. Because the nearby universe dominates the background, one could naïvely anticipate that the above criteria are always satisfied. However, as we show in this paper, this is not necessarily the case. Nearby sources may appear strong because of their proximity, but the distant sources are large in number. In general, the comparison depends on the population distribution of the sources at different frequencies and redshifts and the expansion history of the universe. Here we quantify the relative strengths of these backgrounds and discuss in which astrophysical situations the differences will be significant. The specific case we consider in this paper is simple. We compare the relative strengths and detectability of a localised point source with those for an isotropic background created by similar sources with correct (optimal) and interchanged (suboptimal) filters. In our example the anisotropic part is created by a large number of Milli-Second Pulsars (MSPs) in the Virgo cluster . The Virgo cluster  is a localised source which can be assumed to be a point source of SGWB. This assumption is justified because the angular width of the Virgo cluster (few degrees) is comparable to the angular resolution of the network of present ground based Laser Interferometric GW detectors . The isotropic part is created by all such MSPs in the rest of the universe whose distribution is nearly isotropic. We first show that the total GW flux received from the Virgo cluster exceeds the flux *from the same solid angle as that of the Virgo cluster* from the integrated distant isotropic universe. This is similar to solving the "Olbers' paradox"  problem in cosmology. However, this calculation would provide the comparison between the SNRs observed in different searches, if the searches had uniform frequency response and infinite bandwidth, which is of course impossible. To perform a realistic comparison, we evaluate the redshift integrated spectra of the background for different cosmological evolution and (simple) population distribution models. Combining these spectra with the frequency response of the search one can obtain the final observed SNRs. We compare the SNRs that one would observe for directed and isotropic searches for both the localised and isotropic components of the background. The computed numbers can then be used to draw a final conclusion regarding the effectiveness of different searches in varied cosmological conditions. The paper is organised as follows. In section [2](#sec:olbers){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:olbers"} we provide a brief review of the Olbers' paradox and its more general form in terms of frequency spectrum. We compare the fluxes and the frequency spectra for a localised source and the isotropic background in section [3](#sec:background){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:background"}. In section [4](#sec:SNR){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:SNR"} we compute the numerical results for the observed SNR for different combinations of sources and models. We discuss the results and future directions in section [5](#sec:conclusion){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:conclusion"}. # Olbers' Paradox {#sec:olbers} A common observation is that the night sky is mostly dark. The stars and galaxies stand out in the night sky as the background is almost negligible. This observation can be reconciled with the physics by the apparently straightforward argument that the observed sky should be dominated by the nearby universe. However this argument is flawed. Actually, the number of sources in the universe per unit solid angle increases exactly in the same way as their flux received at the earth reduces, thereby compensating the effect of distance. To pose the problem mathematically, let us consider a solid angle \(\Delta\Omega\). If the universe is homogeneous, the number of sources between distance \(r\) and \(r + \textrm{d} r\) that are contributing to the flux in this solid angle is given by \(n r^2 \Delta\Omega \textrm{d} r\), where \(n\) is the average number density of sources in the universe. However the flux from these sources reduces as \(1/r^2\). Hence, the "effective" number of contributing sources, which would produce the same amount of flux at the point of observation when placed unit distance away, is proportional to \(n \Delta\Omega \textrm{d} r\) and does not depend explicitly on \(r\). That is, every distant part of the universe would contribute equally to this solid angle \(\Delta\Omega\), which would make the night sky almost uniformly bright in an isotropic universe and, infinitely bright in an infinite universe. The seeming incongruity of this prediction with our observations of the night sky is Olbers' paradox. In case of GWs, Olbers' paradox would imply that the anisotropic SGWB would be insignificantly small as compared to the isotropic part, as the latter is created by the distant universe which is much deeper than the local universe. The solution to Olbers' paradox becomes obvious when one includes the expansion of the universe. According to general relativity, GWs propagate in the same way as EM waves along null geodesics . In an expanding universe described by the homogeneous and isotropic Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) metric , along the null geodesics leading to an observer at the origin of the coordinate system, the following condition is satisfied \[c^2 \, \textrm{d} t^2 \-\ a^2(t) \, \textrm{d} r^2 \ = \ 0 \,.\] where \(t\) is the time-like coordinate, \(r\) is the space-like radial coordinate and \(a(t)\) is the so called *scale factor*. Thus, if two pulses are emitted by a source at radial coordinate \(r\) at time \(t_1\) and \(t_1 + \delta t_1\), which reach the observer at the current epoch \(t_0\) and \(t_0 + \delta t_0\) respectively, one can write \[r \ = \ c \int_{t_1}^{t_0} \frac{\textrm{d} t}{a(t)} \ = \ c \int_{t_1 + \delta t_1}^{t_0 + \delta t_0} \frac{\textrm{d} t}{a(t)} \,,\] The above relation yields \(\delta t_0 = a(t_0)/a(t_1) \, \delta t_1\). This implies that the rate at which the pulses are observed and energy received is *lower* by a factor of \(a(t_0)/a(t_1) =: 1 + z\), where \(z\) is the usual cosmological redshift. Moreover, due to the expansion of the universe the wavelengths are stretched and hence energy of each pulse is again reduced by the same factor of \(a(t_0)/a(t_1) = 1 + z\). Combination of these two factors implies that the flux received from a source of luminosity \(L\) (total energy released per unit time as measured by an observer very close to the source), at a redshift \(z\) is  \[F \ = \ \frac{L}{4 \pi r^2 a^2(t_0) \, (1+z)^2} \,. \label{eq:flux}\] Thus expansion of the universe reduces the flux and, hence the effective number of sources, by a factor of \((1+z)^2\). Then the effective number of sources between comoving distance \(r\) and \(r + \textrm{d} r\) becomes \(n \, \Delta\Omega \, \textrm{d} r / (1 + z)^2\), where \(n\) is the *comoving* source number density[^1] at redshift \(z\). Since the redshift \(z\) is a monotonically increasing function of coordinate distance \(r\), the distant universe appears more and more dim. In practice, the total number of galaxies in the universe also reduces with redshift, which plays a role in reducing the above number even further. However, this has a weaker effect, because at high redshifts (\(z \gtrsim 2\)) the effective number density gets a very low weightage due to the \(1/(1+z)^2\) factor. The solution to Olbers' paradox for EM astronomy already implies that the same will hold for SGWB, as there is no difference between these two in this context. GW flux reduces in the same way as for EM waves . Hence, the extragalactic astrophysical GW background is created mostly by low-to-intermediate redshift sources. The above resolution for total flux will however suffice if the detection scheme had flat frequency response over the whole infinite frequency range. This is, of course, never true in practice. So what is more relevant for studying the detectability of different backgrounds is a more general quantity than the flux, namely, the observed frequency spectra \(S(f)\). The total flux \(F\) is the integrated value of \(S(f)\) over the entire frequency range. If a source with luminosity \(L\) at a redshift \(z\) had an intensity distribution \(J(f)\), such that \(\int J(f) \, \textrm{d} f = 1\), one can show by extending the derivation of Eq. ([\[eq:flux\]](#eq:flux){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:flux"}) and taking into account the redshift of frequency interval \(\textrm{d} f\) that the observed spectrum is , \[\label{eq:sf1} S(f) \ = \ \frac{L \, J(f(1+z))}{4\pi r^2 \, a^2(t_0) \, (1+z)} \,.\] The above formula will be the starting point for the main strain power spectrum density (PSD) \(H(f)\) calculation done in the next section. Note that the frequency integral of the above expression, the total flux, \[F \ = \ \int S(f) \, \textrm{d} f\ \ = \ \frac{L \int \textrm{d} f J(f(1+z))}{4\pi r^2 \, a^2(t_0) \, (1+z)} \,,\] identically matches the expression in Eq. ([\[eq:flux\]](#eq:flux){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:flux"}). # Localised vs. the Isotropic background {#sec:background} In this section we compare the GW flux and power spectra generated by the Virgo cluster with those from the rest of the universe for the same kind of source. While the analytical framework we have developed here is valid for any kind of source, for the numerical evaluation we have used the milli-second pulsars (MSPs). This is because the strain PSD of the SGWB created by MSPs in the Virgo cluster is available as a ready result . Also note that the overall amplitude of the strain due to optimistic or pessimistic assumptions (e.g., about the mass-asymmetry of the neutron stars) *do not matter in this work*, as we are only interested in the relative strengths of the localised and isotropic background created by the same kind of sources. So the strength of individual sources cancel out in the calculation. A typical Milky Way like galaxy is expected to have at least \(40,000\) MSPs . Each of the MSPs is expected to emit narrow band GW signal , which in total would appear as a forest of emission lines on the frequency axis. In a galaxy cluster like the Virgo with an estimated \(\sim 10^{8}\) MSPs, the forest is so dense that it appears as a continuum. Using a population distribution model for the MSPs, the SGWB from the Virgo cluster was computed in. Here we essentially integrate their results over different redshifts to get the PSDs, which in turn, gives the SNR for different searches. It is important to emphasise that the GW background considered here is created by *spinning neutron stars* with mass distribution not symmetric about the spin axis and with period of few milliseconds, whether or not they emit EM "pulses". The population models based on EM observations provide an estimate for MSPs, though there can be many more spinning neutron stars without any EM emission, e.g., gravitars . In this paper, since we are interested in relative fluxes and SNRs, the numerical results only depend on the distribution of the sources, *not on their total number*. We assume the estimated distribution of MSPs is applicable to the whole set of spinning neutron stars. Had the total number of such sources been different, *all* the power spectra and the SNRs would have a different, but common, scaling factor, which does not affect the conclusions. ## Comparison of total Flux In the context of Olbers' paradox, the first quantities we compare are the total flux received from the Virgo cluster with that received on the average from the same solid angle as the cluster in an otherwise statistically isotropic universe. Instead of quoting numbers for flux, we quote the effective number of Milky Way Equivalent Galaxies (MWEG), \(N_\textrm{eff}\), which would produce the same amount of flux unit distance away. We find this quantity to be more intuitive than flux. \(N_\textrm{eff}\) is essentially flux (\(F\)) in different units, related by the formula \[F \ = \ N_\textrm{eff} \, \frac{L_\text{MW}}{4 \pi} \,,\] where \(L_\text{MW} \sim 1.5 \times 10^{10} L_{\odot}\) is the blue luminosity of a MWEG and the solar luminosity \(L_{\odot} \approx 4 \times 10^{33} \text{erg} \, s^{-1}\). Thus the ratio of fluxes is the same as the ratio of \(N_\textrm{eff}\), which is our primary interest in this paper. Note that, \(N_\textrm{eff}\) has the dimensions of inverse distance square. This is because if the unit of distance increases, say from Mpc to Gpc (= \(10^3\) Mpc), \(N_{\textrm{eff}}\) must increase by a factor of \(10^6\) to maintain the same flux. Since the Virgo cluster is \(d_\text{V} = 16.5\) Mpc luminosity distance away (which is also the same as the comoving distance when \(a(t_0)\) is set to unity for a very low redshift source like the Virgo cluster) and it has about \(N_\text{V} = 1500\) MWEG , \(N_\textrm{eff}\) for Virgo cluster is \[N_\textrm{eff}^\text{V} \ = \ N_\text{V} / {d_\text{V}}^{2} \ \approx \ 5.5 \, \text{Mpc}^{-2}. \label{eq:neffvirgo}\] We now compute the average \(N_\textrm{eff}\) in a statistically isotropic universe from the solid angle subtended by the Virgo cluster \(\Delta\Omega_\text{V} = 0.012\) steradian (\(\sim 50\) sq. degree, equivalent to a circular region of radius \(\sim 8\) degree). For this we would need to integrate over the radial distance coordinate \(r\) and account for cosmological redshift of the emitted waves. If the *comoving* number density of MWEG in the universe in the Virgo solid angle \(\Delta\Omega_\text{V}\) is a function of redshift, given as \(n(z)\), the total flux received by the observer can be obtained by integrating Eq. ([\[eq:flux\]](#eq:flux){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:flux"}) over spherical shells as \[\label{eq:isoFlux} F_\text{iso} \ = \ \frac{L_\text{MW}}{4 \pi} \, \int_0^\infty \textrm{d} r \, \frac{\Delta\Omega_\text{V} r^2 \, n(z)}{r^2 a^2(t_0) \, (1+z)^2} \,.\] After simplifying, this can be written in terms of \(N_\textrm{eff}\) as \[\label{eq:Neffr} N_\textrm{eff}^\text{iso} \ = \ \Delta\Omega_\text{V} \, \int_0^\infty \textrm{d} r \, \frac{n(z)}{a^2(t_0) \, (1+z)^2} \,.\] In order to compute the above integral analytically or numerically, we need to relate the coordinate distance \(r\) with redshift \(z\). We use the standard relation , \[\label{eq:drdz} \textrm{d} r \ = \ (c/H_0) \, \textrm{d} z / E(z) \,,\] where, \(H_0\) is the Hubble constant and, in a flat universe, \[\label{eq:defE} E(z) := \sqrt{\Omega_\Lambda + \Omega_m(1+z)^3} \,.\] In this paper, we assume that co-moving number density of MWEG is not evolving with time, \(n(z) = n_0\), where \(n_0\) is the current galaxy number density of the universe in the units of MWEG/volume. Instead of choosing a "top hat" model for \(n(z)\), we could consider a detailed number density versus redshift relation, which could provide more accurate source PSD for that model. However, our primary interest is not to get accurate numbers for a particular type of model, our aim is to show that there can be anisotropic SGWB created by sources in the nearby universe, with certain density distribution over redshift, for which the directed search and isotropic search can provide non-overlapping information. So a simplistic model, like the one used here, is preferred in this context. Moreover, we are considering localised sources created by distributions of MSPs which are more likely to be present in the nearby universe where the co-moving matter density can at most evolve slowly until \(1/(1+z)^2\) becomes too small. So a nearly constant profile with a redshift cut-off \(z = z_\text{max}\) does indeed provide a reasonable model. Nevertheless, in the rest of this paper we derive general formulae valid for any arbitrary \(n(z)\), only to get the final results we use \[n(z) \ = \ \left\{ \begin{array}{cl} n_0 & \text{if} \ z \le z_\text{max} \\ 0 & \text{otherwise} \,. \end{array} \right. \label{eq:nofz}\] Given the redshift cutoff discussed above and setting the scale factor at current epoch \(a(t_0) = 1\) without any loss of generality, the form of \(N_\textrm{eff}^\text{iso}\) becomes, \[\label{eq:Neff} N_\textrm{eff}^\text{iso} \ = \ n_0 \, \Delta\Omega_\text{V} \, \frac{c}{H_0} \, \int_0^{z_\text{max}} \frac{\textrm{d} z}{(1+z)^2 \, E(z)} \,.\] We now evaluate the above expression in the specific cases. Here we consider only flat universe (\(\Omega_\Lambda + \Omega_m = 1\)) and compute the results for two different cosmologies: 1. Universe without dark energy A flat matter dominated universe without dark energy (\(\Omega_\Lambda = 0, \Omega_m = 1\)). This case allows us to get the results analytically. These results may not be very realistic, but they provide useful insights through their analytical forms. In this case eqn. ([\[eq:Neff\]](#eq:Neff){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:Neff"}) becomes \[\begin{aligned} N_\textrm{eff}^\text{iso} &=& \Delta\Omega_\text{V} \, \frac{c}{H_0} \, \int_0^{z_\text{max}} \textrm{d} z \, \frac{n_0}{(1+z)^{7/2}} \\ &=& n_0 \, \Delta\Omega_\text{V} \frac{2}{5} \, \frac{c}{H_0} \left[ 1 \,-\, \frac{1}{(1+z_\text{max})^{5/2}} \right]. \end{aligned}\] For \(z_\text{max} \rightarrow \infty\), assuming \(H_{0} \sim 72 \text{km/sec/Mpc}\) and \(n_0 \sim 0.01~h^3~\text{Mpc}^{-3} \sim 0.004~\text{Mpc}^{-3}\) , \(N_\textrm{eff}^\text{iso}\) becomes \(\sim 0.082 ~\text{Mpc}^{-2}\). Hence, by comparing with eqn. ([\[eq:neffvirgo\]](#eq:neffvirgo){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:neffvirgo"}), one can conclude that the Virgo cluster is \(5.5 / 0.08 \approx 69\) times brighter than the statistically isotropic background in this cosmology. 2. \(\Lambda\)CDM cosmology The "standard" Lambda Cold Dark Matter (\(\Lambda\)CDM) universe with parameters taken from observational cosmology (\(\Omega_\Lambda \approx 0.73, \Omega_m \approx 0.27\)). In this case the integral in eqn. ([\[eq:Neff\]](#eq:Neff){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:Neff"}) can be evaluated numerically. Here, for \(z_\text{max} \rightarrow \infty\), the contrast factor turns out to be \(\sim 50\). In general, the above contrast ratios are functions of redshift cut-off \(z_\text{max}\). Table [\[tab:contrast\]](#tab:contrast){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:contrast"} lists them for few relevant values of \(z_\text{max}\). Note that the results for \(z_\text{max} = 10\) and \(z_\text{max} = \infty\) are provided mainly for academic interest, as MSPs are very unlikely to exist beyond \(z_\text{max} \sim 3\) and the top-hat model, \(n(z) = n_0\), cannot hold for such high values of \(z_\text{max}\). On the other hand, the presence of the \((1+z)^{-2}\) factor in Eq. ([\[eq:isoFlux\]](#eq:isoFlux){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:isoFlux"}) ensures that even in those extreme \(z_\text{max}\) cases, though the PSDs shown in Fig. [\[fig:H\]](#fig:H){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:H"} differ significantly, the total flux is minimally affected as seen in Table [\[tab:contrast\]](#tab:contrast){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:contrast"}. However, \(z_\text{max}\) does affect the SNRs for isotropic search, as computed in the subsequent sections. Although the above exercise explains Olbers' paradox specifically for the Virgo cluster, it is true only in principle, for a detector which captures the whole spectrum of the (redshifted) sources with uniform response. In practice, the observed contrast could be more or less than this value depending on the spectrum of the source and the frequency response of the detector, which will be the main consideration in the rest of the paper. Note that these results and the above discussion do not involve anything special about GW, they are equally valid for EM observations. The only difference arises in the definition of the response function. In EM astronomy the detectors generally count photons, while the GW detectors measure strain. However, the strain response function of a GW detector can be converted to flux response function, which will have different frequency response, but the forms of the expressions remain the same. Thus, in some sense, the analytical treatment developed below for GW, can be extended in a straightforward manner to include EM detectors. ## Comparison of Power Spectral Densities (PSDs) Redshift not only reduces intensity, but it shifts power lower to frequencies, which essentially means that the further the sources are the lower the frequency where their power is concentrated. In this subsection we explicitly derive an expression for the strain PSD of the integrated SGWB generated at different cosmological distances and compare it with the Virgo-only PSD derived in. Let \(J(f)\) be the intensity distribution of the SGWB created by the sources (e.g., MSPs) in a MWEG. As given in ([\[eq:sf1\]](#eq:sf1){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:sf1"}), for the source at redshift \(z\), the GW *flux density* near the earth is, \[\label{eq:sf} S(f) \ = \ \frac{L_\text{MW} \, J(f(1+z))}{4\pi r^2 \, a^2(t_0) \, (1+z)}.\] SGWB strain signal \(h_{ij}\) at a given point in space \(\mathbf{x}\) and time \(t\) can be expanded in Fourier modes as \[\begin{aligned} \label{eq:plwave} h_{ij}(t,\mathbf{x}) & \ = \\ \sum_{A=+,\times} & \int_{-\infty}^\infty \textrm{d} f \int_{S^2} \textrm{d}\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}} \, \widetilde{h}_A(f,\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}}) \, e^A_{ij}(\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}}) \, e^{2\pi i f (t-\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}}\cdot\mathbf{x}/c)} \,, \nonumber \end{aligned}\] where \(\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}}\) is the propagation direction of the wave, \(f\) is the frequency and \(e^A_{ij}(\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}})\) is the symmetric-trace-free (STF) basis tensors. The Fourier components, \(\widetilde{h}_{+,\times}(f,\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}})\), have no correlations, for an SGWB us generated by a set of incoherent events, like the ones considered in this paper. This can be expressed as \[\begin{aligned} \langle \widetilde{h}_A(f,\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}}) \, \widetilde{h}_{A'}(f',\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}}')\rangle \ &= \nonumber \\ \delta_{AA'} \, \delta(f-f') &\, \delta^2(\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}}-\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}}') \, H(f) \, {\cal P}(\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}}) \,, \label{eq:uncorrh} \end{aligned}\] where \(H(f)\) represents the shape of the frequency power spectrum of the background and \({\cal P}(\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}})\) is the direction dependent amplitude of the power spectrum. Note that, in general the \(f\) and the \(\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}}\) components need not be separable. That is, the shape of the spectrum can be different in different directions. So, in general one should use a function of the form \(\bar{\cal P}(\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}}, f)\) instead of \(H(f) \, {\cal P}(\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}})\). However, this is not a relevant issue in this paper, \({\cal P}(\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}})\) and \(H(f)\) are indeed separable for the case we consider here. This is because we are considering either the Virgo cluster, localised in the direction \(\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}}_\text{V}\), for which the spectra of the other directions are zero, so without any loss of generality one can write \(\bar{\cal P}(\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}}, f) = \delta^2(\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}}-\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}}_\text{V}) H_\text{V}(f)\). For an isotropic background, by definition, the spectra is the same in every direction, \(\bar{\cal P}(\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}}, f) = H_\text{iso}(f)\). Thus, in both the cases \(\bar{\cal P}(\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}}, f)\) is separable by construction. Also note that, \(H(f)\) and \({\cal P}(\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}})\) can be normalised keeping the product fixed. So, without any loss of generality one can impose one extra condition that, \[\int \textrm{d} \mathbf{\hat{\Omega}} \, {\cal P}(\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}}) = 1 \, ,\] which means that \({\cal P}(\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}}) = \delta^2(\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}}-\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}}_\text{V})\) for the Virgo cluster and \({\cal P}(\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}}) = 1/4\pi\) for an isotropic background. The total energy density of GW is given by  \[\rho_\text{GW} \ = \ \frac{c^2}{32 \pi G} \, \langle \dot{h}(\textbf{x},t) \, \dot{h}(\textbf{x},t) \rangle \,,\] where an overdot represents derivative with respect to time in the observer's frame. We are interested in finding the GW flux density from a localised source, specifically the Virgo cluster. In the above equation, substituting \({\cal P}(\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}}) = \delta(\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}}-\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}}_\text{V})\), eqn. ([\[eq:plwave\]](#eq:plwave){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:plwave"}) and eqn. ([\[eq:uncorrh\]](#eq:uncorrh){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:uncorrh"}), and comparing with the relation \[\rho_\text{GW} \ = \ \frac{1}{c} \int_0^\infty \textrm{d} f \, S(f) \,,\] one can arrive at the formula, \[S(f) \ = \ \frac{c^3}{32 \pi G} \, f^2 \, H(f)\,.\] Finally, combining this with eqn. ([\[eq:sf\]](#eq:sf){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:sf"}) one can finally write the expression for \(H(f)\) for a \(N_\text{gal}\) localised MWEG in a given direction as \[\label{eq:oneSourceH} H(f) \ = \ N_\text{gal} \, \frac{8 G \, L_\text{MW} \, J(f(1+z))}{c^3 \, f^2 \, r^2 \, a^2(t_0) \, (1+z)} \,.\] For the Virgo cluster, \(N_\text{gal} \ := \ N_\text{V} \ \approx \ 1500\) and \(z \approx 0\). Hence, \[\label{eq:hVirgo} H_\text{V}(f) \ = \ N_\text{V} \, \frac{8 G \, L_\text{MW} \, J(f)}{c^3 \, f^2 \, d_\text{V}^2} \,.\] However, the expression for *expected* \(H_\text{V}(f)\) was already calculated in for a given distribution of the pulsars \(N(f)\) in a MWEG as, \[\label{eq:hotSpotVirgo} H_\text{V}(f) \ = \ \tilde{h}_0^2 \, f^4 \, N(f) \,.\] The frequency independent constant \(\tilde{h}_0\) is the typical strength of GW emitted by a \(1.4 M_\odot\) neutron star: \[\tilde{h}_0 \ \approx \ 7 \, \langle {\alpha}^2 \rangle \, \times \, 10^{-34} \, \left(\frac{\epsilon}{10^{-5}}\right) \, \left(\frac{I}{1.1 \times 10^{45} \text{g cm}^2}\right) \,.\] where \(\epsilon\) is the ellipticity of the neutron star, \(I\) is the moment of inertia, \(\alpha \leq 1\) is the orientation factor and \(\langle {\alpha}^2 \rangle\) represents the average with respect to the inclination angle and the polarisation angle. For uniformly distributed source over the angles \(\langle {\alpha}^2 \rangle=2/5.\) We use this relation to alleviate the complications in fixing the proportionality constants as discussed below. To compute the SGWB from the isotropic part, one has to integrate over all the sources in the same solid angle as what the Virgo cluster subtends at the earth. Since the number of MWEG \(\textrm{d} N_\text{gal}\) in solid angle \(\Delta\Omega_\text{V}\) in radial coordinate range \(r\) to \(r + \textrm{d} r\) is \(n(z) \Delta\Omega_\text{V} r^2 \textrm{d} r\), the net result can be obtained by integrating eqn. ([\[eq:oneSourceH\]](#eq:oneSourceH){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:oneSourceH"}) as \[\label{eq:hIso} H_\text{iso}(f) \ = \ \Delta\Omega_\text{V} \int_0^\infty \textrm{d} r \, n(z) \, \frac{8 G \, L_\text{MW} \, J(f(1+z))}{c^3 \, f^2 \, a^2(t_0) \, (1+z)} \,.\] Then invoking the relation between \(\textrm{d} r\) and \(\textrm{d} z\), eqn. ([\[eq:drdz\]](#eq:drdz){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:drdz"}), one can arrive at the relation \[H_\text{iso}(f) \ = \ \Delta\Omega_\text{V} \frac{c}{H_0} \int_0^\infty \textrm{d} z \, \frac{8 G \, L_\text{MW} \, J(f(1+z)) \, n(z) }{c^3 f^2 a^2(t_0) (1+z) \, E(z)} \,.\] Since we are primarily interested in comparing the relative strengths of the Virgo cluster and the isotropic background and we already have a formula for the Virgo cluster, we can hide the growing number of constants in the above equation, by dividing the above equation by eqn.([\[eq:hVirgo\]](#eq:hVirgo){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:hVirgo"}). We can write \[\frac{H_\text{iso}(f)}{H_\text{V}(f)} \ = \ \frac{\Delta\Omega_\text{V} \, d_\text{V}^2}{N_\text{V}} \frac{c}{H_0} \int_0^\infty \textrm{d} z \, \frac{J(f(1+z)) \, n(z) }{a^2(t_0) J(f) \, (1+z) \, E(z)} \,.\] This further reduces complications involving the proportionality constants when we expand the intensity distribution \(J(f)\) in terms of the source number distribution \(N(f)\), in fact, a considerable amount of details were presented in in fixing those constants. We know that GW intensity is proportional to the square of triple derivative of quadrupole moment. If there are \(N(f) \textrm{d} f\) sources in the GW frequency interval \(f\) to \(f + \textrm{d} f\) in a Milky Way like galaxy, one should have \(J(f) \propto N(f) \ f^6\), where the proportionality constant would be independent of frequency, and hence, redshift. Substituting this in the above equation and setting \(a(t_0) = 1\), one gets \[\begin{aligned} \label{eq:ratIsoVirgo} H_\text{iso}(f) &=& H_\text{V}(f) \ \left( \frac{\Delta\Omega_\text{V} \, d_\text{V}^2}{N_\text{V}} \, \frac{c}{H_0} \right) \, \times \\ && \quad \int_0^\infty \textrm{d} z \, (1+z)^5 \frac{n(z)}{E(z)} \, \frac{N(f(1+z))}{N(f)} \,, \nonumber \end{aligned}\] where \(H_\text{V}(f)\) is given by eqn. ([\[eq:hotSpotVirgo\]](#eq:hotSpotVirgo){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:hotSpotVirgo"}). To proceed further we would need to introduce the number distribution of the sources explicitly. Qualitatively this happens because the frequency distribution of sources at different redshifts is dependent on the actual distribution and the cosmology. As mentioned earlier, in this paper we are explicitly evaluating quantities for MSPs in galaxy clusters and the rest of the universe. From the radio survey of our Galactic disk, the number of pulsars is estimated to be at least \(40,000\). The population of these pulsars follow two different distributions, each distribution is Gaussian and has mean and standard deviation different from the others and they can be divided two regions separated by \(50\)Hz. The distributions in each region may be approximated as log-normal distributions as stated below . The probability that the log of pulsar rotation frequency is in the range \(\log f_r\) and \(\log f_r + \textrm{d} \log f_r\) is given by - for \(f_r > 50\)Hz \[\label{eq:p1} p_1(\log f_r) \, \textrm{d}\log f_r \ = \ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi} \sigma_1} \, e^{-\frac{{(\log f_r-\log \mu_1)}^2}{2 {\sigma}_1^2}} \textrm{d} \log f_r \,,\] - for \(f_r < 50\)Hz \[\label{eq:p2} p_2 (\log{f_r}) \, \textrm{d}\log{f_r} \ = \ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi} \sigma_2} \, e^{-\frac{{(\log f_r-\log \mu_2)}^2}{2 {\sigma}_2^2}} \textrm{d} \log f_r \,,\] where \(\mu_1=219\)Hz, \(\sigma_1=0.238\), \(\mu_2=1.71\)Hz, \(\sigma_2=0.420\) and \(f_r=\)Pulsar spin frequency \(=\) half of gravitational wave frequency. Following, here we consider a similar distribution of pulsars in the Virgo cluster and the rest of the universe. There are approximately \(1500\) galaxies in the Virgo cluster. The total number of pulsars in our galaxy can be taken as \(10^8\) for \(f_r<50\) and \(40,000\) for \(f_r>50\). So the distribution of pulsars including MSPs in Virgo cluster becomes \[\label{eq:nf} N(f) \textrm{d} f \ = \ [ N_\text{high} \, p_1(\log f_r) \ + \ N_\text{low} \, p_2(\log f_r)] \, \frac{\textrm{d} f_r}{f_r \ln 10} \,,\] with \(N_\text{high} \sim 4 \times 10^7\) for \(f_r>50\) and \(N_\text{low} \sim 10^{11}\) for \(f_r<50\). Note that the GW emission frequency \(f\) from the MSPs is twice the rotation frequency \(f_r\). For a bandwidth of \(\sim 10^3\) Hz, the number of pulsars in each mHz frequency bin is \(\sim 10\) for \(f > 100\) Hz. In the low frequency regime this number is much larger. Thus, it is not possible to resolve the signal from each pulsar, the signals from the pulsars create a continuum. In this work, we are mainly concerned about pulsars which emit in the frequency band of the ground based laser interferometers, which correspond to a time period of milliseconds. Hence we can only consider the distribution of MSPs, which is essentially dominated by \(p_1(\log f_r)\) of the bimodal pulsar distribution. Hence, from this point, we only consider the high frequency peak of the pulsar distribution and ignore the low frequency peak altogether. Also, for brevity, we omit the subscript from \(\mu_1\), \(\sigma_1\) and replace them by \(\mu\), \(\sigma\) respectively. Considering a log-normal distribution of sources presented in Eq. (19) of (and ignoring the low frequency sources), one can then write \[\begin{aligned} \label{eq:nfratio} &&\frac{N(f(1+z))}{N(f)} \ = \ \frac{1}{1+z} \ \frac{p_1(\log{((1+z)f/2))}}{p_1(\log{(f/2)})} \\ && \quad = \ \frac{1}{1+z} \exp{\left[-\log\left(\frac{(1+z)f^2}{4\mu^2}\right) \frac{\log(1+z)}{2\sigma^2}\right]} \,. \nonumber \end{aligned}\] Then the final expression, eqn. ([\[eq:ratIsoVirgo\]](#eq:ratIsoVirgo){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:ratIsoVirgo"}), becomes \[\begin{aligned} \label{eq:genHIso} && H_\text{iso}(f) \ = \ H_\text{V}(f) \ \left( \frac{\Delta\Omega_\text{V} \, d_\text{V}^2}{N_\text{V}} \right) \ \frac{c}{H_0} \times \\ && \qquad \int_0^\infty \textrm{d} z \, n(z) \, \frac{(1+z)^4}{E(z)} \, e^{-\log\left(\frac{(1+z)f^2}{4\mu^2}\right) \frac{\log(1+z)}{2\sigma^2}} \. \nonumber \end{aligned}\] Now, again, to proceed further we will have to introduce cosmology. As before, we use \(n(z)\) given by eq. ([\[eq:nofz\]](#eq:nofz){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:nofz"}) for two different cosmological models. 1. Universe without dark energy As was in the case of total flux comparison, the justification for including this case is to have analytical handle without deviating too much from the realistic regime. Substituting \(E(z) = (1 + z)^{3/2}\) in eqn. ([\[eq:genHIso\]](#eq:genHIso){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:genHIso"}) one gets \[\label{eq:noLambdaHIsoInfZ} \begin{split} H_\text{iso}(f) \ = & \ H_\text{V}(f) \ \left( \frac{n_0 \, \Delta\Omega_\text{V} \, d_\text{V}^2}{N_\text{V}} \right) \ \frac{c}{H_0} \times \\ & \quad\int_0^{z_\text{max}}\textrm{d} z \, (1+z)^{5/2} \, e^{-\log\left(\frac{(1+z)f^2}{4\mu^2}\right) \frac{\log(1+z)}{2\sigma^2}} \, ,\\ = & \ H_\text{V}(f) \ \left( \frac{n_0 \, \Delta\Omega_\text{V} \, d_\text{V}^2}{N_\text{V}} \right) \ \frac{c}{H_0} \, (\sigma \ln 10) \, \times \\ & \quad e^{y^2/2} \sqrt{\pi \over 2} \left[\mathrm{erf}\left(\frac{y_m-y}{\sqrt{2}}\right) \ + \ \mathrm{erf}\left(\frac{y}{\sqrt{2}}\right)\right] \,, \end{split}\] where, \[\begin{aligned} y &:=& \frac{7}{2}\sigma\ln 10 \-\ \frac{1}{\sigma\ln 10}\ln\left(\frac{f}{2 \mu}\right) \, ,\\ y_m &:=& \frac{1}{\sigma}\log(1 + z_\text{max}) \,. \end{aligned}\] Here we use the standard definition of the error function \[\mathrm{erf}(x) \ := \ \frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi}}\int_0^{x} \, e^{-t^2} \, \textrm{d} t \,,\] which happens to be an odd function: \[\mathrm{erf}(-x) \ := \ \frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi}}\int_0^{-x} \, e^{-t^2} \, \textrm{d} t \ = \-\mathrm{erf}(x) \,.\] In the limit \(z_\text{max} \rightarrow \infty\) (that is, \(y_m \rightarrow \infty\)), for finite values of \(f\), \(\mathrm{erf}((y_m-y)/\sqrt{2}) \rightarrow 1\). Hence, in that case, one can write \[\begin{aligned} \label{eq:noLambdaHIso} && H_\text{iso}(f) \ = \ H_\text{V}(f) \ \left( \frac{n_0 \, \Delta\Omega_\text{V} \, d_\text{V}^2}{N_\text{V}} \right) \ \frac{c}{H_0} \times \\ && \qquad \left[ \sqrt{\pi/2} \, (\ln 10) \, \sigma \, e^{y^2/2} \left(1 \ + \ \mathrm{erf}(y/\sqrt{2})\right) \right] \. \nonumber \end{aligned}\] Note that in this special case, \(H_\text{iso}(f)/H_\text{V}(f)\) is a monotonically decreasing function of frequency. 2. \(\Lambda\)CDM cosmology In this case we substitute eqn. ([\[eq:defE\]](#eq:defE){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:defE"}) in eqn. ([\[eq:genHIso\]](#eq:genHIso){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:genHIso"}) and then numerically integrate over redshift \(z\) for each frequency bin \(f\): \[\begin{aligned} \label{eq:LCDMHIso} && H_\text{iso}(f) \ = \ H_\text{V}(f) \ \left( \frac{n_0 \, \Delta\Omega_\text{V} \, d_\text{V}^2}{N_\text{V}} \right) \ \frac{c}{H_0} \times \\ && \qquad \int_0^{z_\text{max}} \textrm{d} z \, \frac{(1+z)^4 \, e^{-\log\left(\frac{(1+z)f^2}{4\mu^2}\right) \frac{\log(1+z)}{2\sigma^2}}}{\sqrt{\Omega_\Lambda + (1+z)^3 \Omega_m)}} \. \nonumber \end{aligned}\] In this paper, we use only one set of \(H_\text{V}(f)\) taken from which corresponds to the eccentricity \(\epsilon = 10^{-5}\). Since \(H_\text{V}(f) \sim \epsilon^2\), both \(H_\text{iso}(f)\) and \(H_\text{V}(f)\) also scale in the same way, so the PSDs and SNRs for other values \(\epsilon\) can be readily obtained. Due to this simple scaling, the main results of this paper, which involve ratios of SNRs, are independent of the choice of \(\epsilon\). The particular choice of \(\epsilon = 10^{-5}\), though much larger than the current belief, was made only for brevity, to keep the SNRs in the range \(0.1\)-\(1\) for easy comparison. Figure [\[fig:H\]](#fig:H){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:H"} shows the comparison between \(H_\text{V}(f)\) and \(H_\text{iso}(f)\) for different redshift cut-offs for two cosmological models: no dark energy (above) and \(\Lambda\)CDM (below). Qualitatively also the results are not surprising. The high redshifts sources move to lower frequencies. Hence, higher the redshift cut-off stronger the PSD at lower frequencies. Although only small changes can be noticed in the top and bottom panels of Figure [\[fig:H\]](#fig:H){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:H"}, the differences in the plots are of the order of factor of few, which makes a significant difference in the overall observed SNR. # Observed Signal-to-Noise Ratio {#sec:SNR} Now we have all the details to answer the central questions---which component of the SGWB is more important in searches for a SGWB, does an optimal search make a significant difference? To address these questions we review key results relevant for an anisotropic SGWB. A substantial amount of literature has been written in developing anisotropic searches . The key results from these papers can be summarised as follows: In order to search for an anisotropic background one generally divides the data in many segments with time intervals much greater than the light travel time delay between the detector sites (few tens of milliseconds), but small enough so that the earth can be considered stationary over that period. Generally the period is taken as few tens of seconds . The data from pairs of detectors are then correlated in the frequency domain with suitable filters to search for different signals. It can be shown that, in order to search for an unpolarised SGWB with angular power distribution \(\mathcal{P}(\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}})\) and spectrum \(H(f)\), the optimal statistic is  \[S \ = \ \frac{\displaystyle{\sum_{i=1}^n \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \textrm{d} f \frac{H(f) \, \gamma_\mathcal{P}^*(t_i,f)}{P_1(t_i;|f|) \, P_2(t_i;|f|)} \, \widetilde{s}_1^*(t_i;f) \, \widetilde{s}_2(t_i;f)}}{\displaystyle{\delta T \sum_{i=1}^n \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \textrm{d} f \frac{H^2(f) \, |\gamma_\mathcal{P}(t_i,f)|^2}{P_1(t_i;|f|) \, P_2(t_i;|f|)}}}, \label{eq:GWBS}\] where \(t_i\) is the segment time, \(\widetilde{s}_I^*(t_i;f)\) and \(P_I(t_i;|f|)\) are respectively the short-term Fourier transform and noise PSD of the data from detector \(I\) and, \[\begin{aligned} \gamma_\mathcal{P}(t,f) &:=& \sum_{A=+,\times}\int_{S^2} \, \textrm{d}\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}} \, \mathcal{P}(\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}}) \times \label{eq:gamma}\\ && \quad F_1^A(\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}},t) \, F_2^A(\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}},t) \, e^{2\pi \i f \mathbf{\hat{\Omega}}\cdot\mathbf{\Delta x}(t)/c}, \nonumber \end{aligned}\] is the general overlap reduction function expressed in terms of the separation vector between the detectors \(\mathbf{\Delta x}(t)\) and the antenna pattern functions \(F_I^A(\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}},t)\). The bandwidth of the overlap reduction function for the isotropic search, \({\cal P}(\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}}) = 1/4\pi\), is very low, \(0\) to \(\sim 60\) Hz, for the LIGO Hanford-Livingston (HL) baseline, as shown in figure [\[fig:SNRSplit\]](#fig:SNRSplit){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:SNRSplit"}, which excludes the most sensitive band of the ground based laser interferometric detectors. This unfortunate fact significantly limits the effectiveness in finding astrophysical SGWB generated in the local universe. It may be able to detect high frequency sources if they are appropriately redshifted. The directed search overlap reduction function, on the other hand, has an infinite bandwidth, which means that the search is only limited by the detector bandwidth, and hence can capture a wide range of high frequency sources. Had the search been optimal, that is, if the model sky \(\mathcal{P}(\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}})\) and PSD \(H(f)\) matched the true counterparts \(\mathcal{P}_\text{true}(\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}})\) and \(H_\text{true}(f)\) respectively, the expectation value of the observed signal-to-noise ratio would be  \[\text{SNR}_\text{true} \ = \ 2 \sqrt{\delta T \sum_{i=1}^n \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \textrm{d} f \frac{H_\text{true}^2(f) \, |\gamma_{\mathcal{P}_\text{true}}(t_i,f)|^2}{P_1(t_i;|f|) \, P_2(t_i;|f|)}} \,.\] For a given background, this is the *maximum observable* average SNR. If, however, the model does not match the true sky, (expectation of) the observed SNR becomes \[\begin{split} &\text{SNR}_\text{obs} \ =\ 2 \sqrt{\delta T} \ \times \\ & \quad \frac{\displaystyle{\sum_{i=1}^n \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \textrm{d} f \frac{H(f) \, \gamma_\mathcal{P}^*(t_i,f)}{P_1(t_i;|f|) \, P_2(t_i;|f|)} \, H_\text{true}(f) \, \gamma_{\mathcal{P}_\text{true}}(t_i,f)}}{\displaystyle{\sqrt{\sum_{i=1}^n \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \textrm{d} f \frac{H^2(f) \, |\gamma_\mathcal{P}(t_i,f)|^2}{P_1(t_i;|f|) \, P_2(t_i;|f|)}}}} \,. \end{split}\] Using the above formulae we can now perform numerical evaluation for the following quantities to answer the questions we have raised: 1. \(\text{SNR}^\text{V}_\text{V}\): SNR in a directed search for the Virgo cluster. We put \(\mathcal{P}_\text{true}(\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}}) = \mathcal{P}(\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}}) = \delta(\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}}-\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}}_\text{V})\), \(H_\text{true}(f) = H(f) = H_\text{V}(f)\) (assuming that the Virgo cluster is nearly a point source for the resolution of the radiometer formed by the LIGO HL baseline). 2. \(\text{SNR}^\text{iso}_\text{iso}\): SNR obtained by the isotropic search for the isotropic background. We get this by setting \(\mathcal{P}_\text{true}(\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}}) = \mathcal{P}(\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}}) = 1/4\pi\), \(H_\text{true}(f) = H(f) = H_\text{iso}(f)\). 3. \(\text{SNR}^\text{iso}_\text{V}\): SNR obtained by doing a directed search when the actual background is isotropic. We use \(\mathcal{P}_\text{true}(\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}}) = 1/4\pi\), \(\mathcal{P}(\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}}) = \delta(\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}}-\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}}_\text{V})\), \(H_\text{true}(f) = H_\text{iso}(f)\), \(H(f) = H_\text{V}(f)\). This number when compared to \(\text{SNR}^\text{V}_\text{V}\), will quantify how much the directed search will be able to differentiate between the isotropic and anisotropic search and hence justify if the search is useful for probing the SGWB anisotropy in presence of an isotropic SGWB. 4. \(\text{SNR}^\text{V}_\text{iso}\): SNR contributed by the Virgo cluster to the isotropic search. We put \(\mathcal{P}_\text{true}(\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}}) = \delta(\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}}-\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}}_\text{V})\), \(\mathcal{P}(\mathbf{\hat{\Omega}}) = 1/4\pi\), \(H_\text{true}(f) = H_\text{V}(f)\), \(H(f) = H_\text{iso}(f)\). This number shows if the isotropic search will be able to detect the presence of a localised source. By comparing with \(\text{SNR}^\text{V}_\text{V}\) one would be able to conclude if a dedicated directed search produces significantly better results. Since we are using only one spectrum for the Virgo cluster for this relative study and the spectrum hardly depends on cosmology, we get only one value of \(\text{SNR}^\text{V}_\text{V}\) in this paper, which happens to be \(\text{SNR}^\text{V}_\text{V} = 0.6067\) for the LIGO HL baseline with an observation time of one sidereal day, advanced LIGO design sensitivity "of zero-detuning of the signal recycling mirror, with high laser power"  and frequency range \(10-2000\) Hz. The values of the other three SNRs, \(\text{SNR}^\text{iso}_\text{iso}\), \(\text{SNR}^\text{iso}_\text{V}\) and \(\text{SNR}^\text{V}_\text{iso}\) are listed in Table [\[tab:SNR\]](#tab:SNR){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:SNR"} for different redshift cut-offs and cosmologies for the same detector pair and observation time. The table shows that when the universe has MSPs at high redshifts (younger universe) and it is statistically isotropic at large scales, the isotropic search performs well. However, if the background is dominated by nearby sources (older universe) a localised search can out perform an all sky isotropic search. Moreover, in all the cases the directed search for the isotropic background is much lower, *by more than two orders of magnitude* than the directed search for a localised source, signifying that the directed search is highly sensitive to the anisotropy of a background and would be able make a sky map, provided the background is stronger than the detector noise level (integrated over the observation time). Finally, the isotropic search for a localised background is even more suboptimal due to the mismatch in signal and model, the SNR is orders of magnitude below the optimal SNR, hence an isotropic search would not be able to detect the presence of a localised source. Note that the results for the high \(z_\text{max}\) are provided for academic interest, as the \(n(z) = n_0\) model is bound to fail for high values of \(z_\text{max}\). The reason why the isotropic background, which only dominates in a small range of low frequencies, can still compete with the Virgo cluster, is illustrated in figure [\[fig:SNRSplit\]](#fig:SNRSplit){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:SNRSplit"} obtained for the \(\Lambda\)CDM cosmology with \(z_\text{max} = 2\). The top left panel shows \(H(f)\) for isotropic and Virgo backgrounds; the top right panel shows \(H_\text{true} H_\text{obs} /(P_1(f) P_2(f))\); the bottom left panel shows the overlap reduction function for the two cases; the bottom right plot shows essentially the final integrand which provides the SNR. Even though \(H_\text{iso}(f)\) seems to be dominating over \(H_\text{V}(f)\) in this case, the large bandwidth of the directed search equalises the observed SNR in either cases when the model matches the true signal. As shown in Table [\[tab:SNR\]](#tab:SNR){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:SNR"}, \(\text{SNR}^\text{V}_\text{V} \approx \text{SNR}^\text{iso}_\text{iso}\) for \(z_\text{max} = 2\). For the purpose of completeness, we also include numerical results for the Hanford-Virgo and Livingston-Virgo detector baselines. We do this for a few realistic values of \(z_\text{max}\) for \(\Lambda\)CDM cosmology and Advanced Virgo design sensitivity . The results are shown in Table [\[tab:LIGOVirgoSNR\]](#tab:LIGOVirgoSNR){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:LIGOVirgoSNR"}. Clearly, for the LIGO-Virgo baselines the results are similar to the LIGO HL baseline. However, isotropic search with the LIGO-Virgo baselines has better high frequency sensitivity  than the LIGO HL baseline. This provides comparatively higher isotropic search SNR even for low redshift cut-offs (\(z_\text{max} \lesssim 1\)). # Conclusion {#sec:conclusion} Over the past two decades the search algorithms for both isotropic and anisotropic stochastic gravitational wave background have been developed and applied to data from the ground based Laser Interferometric GW detectors. In this work we showed that both of these searches are important for different backgrounds and one search cannot replace the other. However, for detection purposes, one can conclude that the isotropic search is more effective when the sources are distributed uniformly across the sky and up to a high redshift, while the directed search is more efficient when most of the sources are in the nearby universe and their distribution is anisotropic, with one (or few) localised sources. We show that the directed search is highly sensitive to the anisotropy of a background which is useful for making a sky map of the background. The performance of the isotropic search, on the other hand, depends on the expansion history of the universe and population distribution of MSP. The competition is such that the SNR of the directed search for the Virgo cluster can become comparable or even exceed the all sky integrated isotropic search depending on the cosmology. We have also presented a detailed analysis to show how this competition becomes close even though the all sky integrated background is the result of sources whose number is many orders of magnitude larger. The contrast between different searches can become much stronger for searches over narrower frequency bands. In this paper, we studied the simplest form of an anisotropic background, namely a highly localised source, compared to an isotropic background. This was sufficient to provide motivation for the directed search. However, one could also perform an explicit comparison like this for other kinds of anisotropic searches, e.g., the spherical harmonic search . Different sources with very different population distribution over redshift \[\(n(z)\)\] and frequency spectra \[\(L J(f)\)\] could also lead to significantly different results. Hence, it may be worth repeating our calculations for different cosmological (no dark energy vs. \(\Lambda\)CDM), population and spectral models for the sources. These studies would be useful if one is planning to perform specific searches for a certain kind of anisotropy or constituent sources. Note that the general SNR formulae presented in this paper can incorporate any \(n(z)\) and \(J(f)\), hence complicated population synthesis models can also be included in this formalism. The large values of isotropic search SNRs estimated for high redshift cut-offs (\(z_\text{max}\)) in Tables [\[tab:SNR\]](#tab:SNR){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:SNR"} & [\[tab:LIGOVirgoSNR\]](#tab:LIGOVirgoSNR){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:LIGOVirgoSNR"} are reflections of the fact that we used a top-hat model for \(n(z)\), a model that can not be stretched to high \(z_\text{max}\) values. Since these SNRs are highly sensitive to various source and cosmological models, one can even consider studying if the searches would be able to constrain these models (e.g., put an upper limit on \(z_\text{max}\) assuming a certain \(n(z)\) model). The analyses in this paper are restricted to either highly localised or isotropic backgrounds, which are, by their intrinsic nature, suboptimal. They are currently performed this way due to the lack of reliable models of the anisotropic sky. It may however be possible to gather information from electromagnetic astronomy and construct more optimal filters to perform search for anisotropic backgrounds. Here one may even consider using different spectra for different directions, as the composition of sources in different direction may be different. However, such an analysis does not exist in literature and, also, it may not be very straightforward to develop such an analysis in a computationally viable way. In such cases also, a comparative study similar to this paper needs to be performed, to decide if such an effort is worthwhile. In this paper we computed most of the numerical results for the LIGO Hanford-Livingston (HL) baseline, which is sufficient to justify the importance of different searches. For academic interest, we also included results for longer baselines including the Virgo detector. However, for longer baselines the resolution of the radiometer is considerably high and the assumption that the Virgo cluster is a point source breaks down. So to get more rigorous SNR estimations, one should consider the finite size of the Virgo cluster and, perhaps, use a model for the mass distribution. The goal of this paper is not to address the issue of template mismatch and suggest a solution. However, since some of the SNRs in the tables are negative, we must caution the readers that template mismatch can cause negative values of the statistic in specific frequency bands and eventually lead to wrong upper limits when integrated over all frequencies. The absolute value of the estimator may be one way to address the issue, though care must be taken to ensure that the statistic is indeed estimating the desired quantity. This issue can be ignored when one is trying to probe a background that is by far the strongest in the sky in the frequency band considered. In this particular situation the filter is near optimal. Which may not be the case in general. A more rigorous strategy must be developed in order to alleviate this problem, perhaps by fitting all the SGWB components together.

{'timestamp': '2014-05-01T02:08:16', 'yymm': '1401', 'arxiv_id': '1401.5898', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5898'}

## The double Eulerian polynomial {#the-double-eulerian-polynomial .unnumbered} The double Eulerian polynomial \(A_n(u,v)\) enumerates the number of descents of a permutation and its inverse, \[A_n(t, s) = \sum_{\pi\in\mathbb{S}_n} u^{\des(\pi)}v^{\des(\pi^{-1})}.\] It is a natural generalization of the classical Eulerian polynomial \(A_n(u, 1)\). The latter polynomial is well-known to be positive in the basis \((u^i(1+u)^{n-i})_{i=0} ^n\). This has been proved in several ways; notably by geometric means, and by an elegant bijective argument by Foata and Strehl (see for an excellent exposition). There is no analogous result for the double Eulerian polynomial, though there is a conjectured one by Gessel: \(A_n(u,v)\) should be integral and positive in the basis \(((uv)^i(u+v)^j(1+uv)^{n-2i-j})_{i,j}\). Visontai gave explicit formulas for the coordinates of \(A_n(u,v)\) in this basis, but was unable to prove that they are positive, nor that they are integers. He also conjectured a new way of defining \(A_n(u,v)\), as follows (this is our main theorem). Here, \(\mathbb{I}_n\) is the set of inversion tables of length \(n\), and \((\asc, \row)\) are two statistics, all defined below. We will spend the remainder of this note proving Theorem [\[th_main\]](#th_main){reference-type="ref" reference="th_main"}, after giving the necessary definitions. We identify permutations \(w\) of length \(n\) with words \(w_1\dots w_n\), and with permutation diagrams \(\{(i,w_i): 1 \leq i \leq n\}\), which we read as Cartesian coordinates: a point \((x, y)\) refers to a point \(x\) steps to the right and \(y\) steps up from \((0,0)\). See Figures [\[fi_pip\]](#fi_pip){reference-type="ref" reference="fi_pip"} and [\[fi_pi\]](#fi_pi){reference-type="ref" reference="fi_pi"} for examples. An inversion table \(e = e_1\dots e_n\) of length \(n\) is any sequence of positive integers satisfying \(1 \leq e_i \leq i\) for all \(i\) (this differs slightly from the notation in, which we otherwise follow). We will identify these with marked staircases, examples of which are given in Figures [\[fi_ep\]](#fi_ep){reference-type="ref" reference="fi_ep"} and [\[fi_e\]](#fi_e){reference-type="ref" reference="fi_e"}. For a permutation \(w\), let \(\DES(w) = \{i: w_i > w_{i+1}\}\) be the *set* of descent positions, and \(\IDES(w) = \DES(\pi^{-1})\) be the descent set of the inverse permutation. For an inversion table \(e\), we define \(\ASC(e) = \{i: e_i < e_{i+1}\}\) and \(\ROW(e) = \{e_i: 1 \leq i \leq n\}-\{1\}\). Note that the strict inequality in the definition of \(\ASC\) is essential, and that we always have \(e_1 = 1\). We let \(\des = \# \DES\) be the number of descents, and similarly for \(\ides\), \(\asc\) and \(\row\). If \(S\) is a set of postive integers, we let \(u^S = \prod_{i\in S} u_i\). From now on, we use indeterminates \(u_1, u_2, \dots\) and \(v\). ## Examples {#examples .unnumbered} We give the values of the statistics of the permutation \(\pi\) in Figure [\[fi_pi\]](#fi_pi){reference-type="ref" reference="fi_pi"} and of the inversion table \(e\) in Figure [\[fi_e\]](#fi_e){reference-type="ref" reference="fi_e"}. We have \(\DES(\pi) = \{1,4,5,7,8\}\), \(\IDES(\pi) = 1,3,4,6,8\}\), \(\ASC(e) = \{1,2,4,5,7,8\}\) and \(\ROW(e) = \{2,3,4,5,7\}\). Thus \(\des(\pi) = 5\), \(\ides(\pi) = 5\), \(\asc(e) = 6\) and \(\row(e) = 5\). To prove Theorem [\[th_main\]](#th_main){reference-type="ref" reference="th_main"}, we will prove the stronger statement \[\label{eq_one} \sum_{\pi\in\mathbb{S}_n} u^{\DES(\pi)}v^{\ides(\pi)} = \sum_{e\in\mathbb{I}_n} u^{\ASC(e)}v^{\row(e)}.\] By Möbius inversion, equation [\[eq_one\]](#eq_one){reference-type="ref" reference="eq_one"} holds if and only if we have \[\label{eq_two} \sum_{\substack{\pi\in\mathbb{S}_n \\ S \subseteq \DES(\pi)}} s^{\ides(\pi)} = \sum_{\substack{e\in\mathbb{I}_n \\ S \subseteq \ASC(e)}} s^{\row(e)},\] for each \(S \subseteq [n-1]\). The idea now is to fix a subset \(S\) of postive integers and induct on \(n\) (in a sense to be specified) to prove equation [\[eq_two\]](#eq_two){reference-type="ref" reference="eq_two"}. Thus fix a subset \(S \subseteq \{1, 2, \dots\}\). We define two rooted labeled trees \(T_{\mathbb{S}}\) and \(T_{\mathbb{I}}\), as follows. The vertices of \(T_{\mathbb{S}}\) are all permutations \(w_1\dots w_n\) whose length \(n\) satisfies \(n \notin S\) (in particular, the empty permutation, of length \(0\), is a node). A permutation \(\pi\) of length \(r+s\) is a child of another permutation \(\pi'\) of length \(r\), where \(s\) is smallest such that \(s \geq 1\) and \(r+s \notin S\), if the first \(r\) letters of \(\pi\) induce[^1] the same permutation as \(\pi'\). It follows that the empty permutation is the root node. Each node in \(T_{\mathbb{S}}\) is labeled by the pair \((n, k)\), where \(n\) is the length of the permutation and \(k\) is its number of inverse descents. Similarly, the vertices of \(T_{\mathbb{I}}\) are all inversion tables \(e_1\dots e_n\) whose length \(n\) satisfies \(n\notin S\), and an inversion table \(e\) of length \(r+s\) is a child of \(e'=e'_1\dots e'_r\) if \(e = e'_1\dots e'_r e_{r+1} \dots e_{r+s}\) (with the same condition on \(s\) as for \(T_{\mathbb{S}}\)). Each node is labeled \((n, k)\), where \(n\) is the length of the inversion table and \(k\) is its value of the row statistic. The empty inversion table is the root node. To prove equation [\[eq_two\]](#eq_two){reference-type="ref" reference="eq_two"} for our fixed set \(S\), it suffices to prove that \(T_{\mathbb{S}}\) and \(T_{\mathbb{I}}\) are isomorphic as labeled rooted trees. We will do this by producing an isomorphism \(\Phi\) between the two trees, which takes a permutation \(\pi\) of length \(n\) with \(k\) inverse descents satisfying \(S \cap [n] \subseteq \DES(\pi)\) to some inversion table \(e = \Phi(\pi)\) of length \(n\), satisfying \(\row(e) = k\) and \(S \cap [n] \subseteq \ASC(e)\). We will construct \(\Phi\) inductively. Let \(\Phi\) map the root of \(T_{\mathbb{S}}\) to the root of \(T_{\mathbb{I}}\). Suppose that we have already defined \(\Phi(\pi') = e'\). We will show, for each \(k\), that the number of children of \(\pi'\) with \(k\) inverse descents equals the number of children of \(e'\) whose row statistic equals \(k\). This allows us to extend \(\Phi\) to all the children of \(\pi'\). Thus fix a permutation \(\pi'\) of length \(r\) and an inversion table \(e'\) of length \(r\) such that \(\ides(\pi') = \row(e') = p\), say. Suppose \(s\) is smallest such that \(s \geq 1\) and \(r+s \notin S\). For children \(\pi\) of \(\pi'\), we call the first \(r\) letters the *early* part, and the last \(s\) letters the *late* part. The children \(\pi\) are determined in a bijective way by \((r+1)\)-tuples \((x_0, \dots, x_r)\) of nonnegative integers \(x_i\) with sum \(s\). The bijection[^2] is given by letting \(x_i\) be the number of letters in the late part of \(\pi\) which are between (in value) the \(i\)th and \((i+1)\)st largest letters of the early part of \(\pi\). Moreover, the number of inverse descents of \(\pi\) is[^3] \(\ides(\pi') + \sum_{i \in T} (x_i-1)_+ + \sum_{i\notin T} x_i\), where \(T = \IDES(\pi')\). This is hopefully made clear by Figures [\[fi_pip\]](#fi_pip){reference-type="ref" reference="fi_pip"} and [\[fi_pi\]](#fi_pi){reference-type="ref" reference="fi_pi"}. On the other hand we consider children \(e\) of \(e'\), of length \(r+s\). Such \(e\) are in bijection with subsets \(T \subseteq [r+s]\) of size \(s\) by letting \(T = \{e_i: r < i \leq r+s\}\) (note that this is a *set* since \(\{s+1, \dots, r-1\} \subseteq \ASC(e)\) is a child). Moreover, \(\row(e) = \row(e') + \#(T^c \cap ROW(e'))\). By the preceding two paragraphs, all that remains is to prove that the number of \((x_0,\dots,x_r)\) with \(\sum_{i=0}^{p-1} (x_i-1)_+ + \sum_{i = p} ^r x_i = t\) and \(\sum_{i=0} ^r x_i = s\) (here, we have reordered the \(x_i\)'s, which clearly does not affect the count) equals the number of \(T \subseteq [r+s]\) such that \(|T| = s\) and \(|T \cap \{p+2, p+3, \dots\}| = t\), for all nonnegative integers \(r,s,p,t\). These two counts are easily seen to be \[\sum_{a=0}^t {p+1\choose s-t} {s-a-1\choose a}{a+r-p-1\choose a}\] and \[{p+1\choose s-t}{r+s-p-1\choose t}\] respectively. That they are equal is a classical fact. This finishes the proof of Theorem [\[th_main\]](#th_main){reference-type="ref" reference="th_main"}. ## Final remarks {#final-remarks .unnumbered} It is interesting to note that while the statement of Theorem [\[th_main\]](#th_main){reference-type="ref" reference="th_main"} is symmetric in \(t\) and \(s\), the proof is not. We have failed to generalize the Theorem to one with two set-valued statistics. If we define \(\maj(\pi)\) to be the sum of the elements in \(\DES(\pi)\), and \(\amaj(e)\) to be the sum of the elements in \(\ASC(e)\), then the proof shows that the pairs \((\maj, \ides)\) and \((\amaj, \row)\) are equidistributed. There does not seem to be an obvious generalisation involving \(\maj\), \(\amaj\) and sums of \(\IDES\) and \(\ROW\). Finally, it follows from Theorem [\[th_main\]](#th_main){reference-type="ref" reference="th_main"} that \(\asc\) and \(\row\) are equidistributed (since \(\des\) and \(\ides\) are). I do not know of a direct proof of this fact. [^1]: that is, if we renumber the first \(r\) letters of \(\pi\) by \(1,\dots,r\), we get the permutation \(\pi'\) [^2]: To prove this is a bijection, note that the last \(r\) letters of \(\pi\) form a decreasing word since \(\pi\) is a child (which implies that \(r, r+1, \dots, r+s-1\) are descents). [^3]: We use the notation \(x_+ = x\) for \(x \geq 0\) and \(x_+ = 0\) for \(x < 0\).

{'timestamp': '2014-01-23T02:08:49', 'yymm': '1401', 'arxiv_id': '1401.5653', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5653'}

# Introduction Let \(\Omega \subset \mathbb{R}^{2}\) be a bounded domain with a boundary \(\Gamma := \partial \Omega\). We consider a thermoelastic Reissner-Mindlin-Timoshenko plate of a uniform thickness \(h > 0\) such that its midplane occupies the domain \(\Omega\) when being in a reference state free of any elastic or thermal stresses. The heat propagation is modeled by means of the Cattaneo's law (viz. ). With \(w\) denoting the vertical displacement of the midplane, \(\psi\), \(\varphi\) the after-bending-angles of vertical filaments being perpendicular to the midplane in the reference state, \(\theta\) the thermal moment and \(q\) the moment of the heat flux, respectively, the symmetrized form of Reissner-Mindlin-Timoshenko equations reads as \[\begin{aligned} \rho_{1} w_{tt}-K (w_{x_{1}} + \psi)_{x_{1}}-K (w_{x_{2}} + \varphi)_{x_{2}} &= 0 \text{ in } (0, \infty) \times \Omega, \label{GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_1} \\ \rho_{2} \psi_{tt}-D(\psi_{x_{1} x_{1}} + \tfrac{1-\mu}{2} \psi_{x_{2} x_{2}} + \tfrac{1 + \mu}{2} \varphi_{x_{1} x_{2}}) + K (\psi + w_{x_{1}}) + \gamma \theta_{x_{1}} &= 0 \text{ in } (0, \infty) \times \Omega, \label{GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_2} \\ \rho_{2} \varphi_{tt}-D(\varphi_{x_{2} x_{2}} + \tfrac{1-\mu}{2} \varphi_{x_{1} x_{1}} + \tfrac{1 + \mu}{2} \psi_{x_{1} x_{2}}) + K (\varphi + w_{x_{2}}) + \gamma \theta_{x_{2}} &= 0 \text{ in } (0, \infty) \times \Omega, \label{GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_3} \\ \rho_{3} \theta_{t} + \kappa \mathrm{div}\, q + \beta \theta + \gamma (\psi_{tx_{1}} + \varphi_{tx_{2}}) &= 0 \text{ in } (0, \infty) \times \Omega, \label{GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_4} \\ \tau_{0} q_{t} + \delta q + \kappa \nabla \theta &= 0 \text{ in } (0, \infty) \times \Omega. \label{GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_5} \end{aligned}\] A physical deduction of the model can be found in. See also for the case of purely elastic Reissner-Mindlin-Timoshenko plates or thermoelastic Kirchhoff-Love plates with parabolic heat conduction. Note that, in contrast to the heat equation in uniformly thick bodies, \(\beta \theta\)-term naturally arises in the model since \(\theta\) is the thermal moment and not the temperature. Structurally viewed, Reissner-Mindlin-Timoshenko Equations ([\[GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_1\]](#GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_1){reference-type="ref" reference="GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_1"})--([\[GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_5\]](#GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_5){reference-type="ref" reference="GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_5"}) can be interpreted as a 2D Lamé system ([\[GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_2\]](#GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_2){reference-type="ref" reference="GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_2"})--([\[GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_3\]](#GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_3){reference-type="ref" reference="GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_3"}) for the filament angles \((\psi, \varphi)'\) coupled to the wave equation ([\[GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_1\]](#GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_1){reference-type="ref" reference="GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_1"}) for the bending component \(w\) and the Cattaneo system ([\[GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_4\]](#GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_4){reference-type="ref" reference="GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_4"})--([\[GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_5\]](#GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_5){reference-type="ref" reference="GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_5"}) for the thermal moment \(\theta\) and the moment of the heat flux \(q\). Since neither mechanical, no thermal dissipation due to the lack of a direct coupling to the Cattaneo system is present in Equation ([\[GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_1\]](#GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_1){reference-type="ref" reference="GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_1"}), one expects the decay properties of ([\[GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_1\]](#GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_1){reference-type="ref" reference="GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_1"})--([\[GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_5\]](#GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_5){reference-type="ref" reference="GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_5"}) to be not better than those of classical or hyperbolic 2D thermoelasticity. The latter have been investigated by numerous authors. Whereas the thermal dissipation arising from the parabolic heat equation leads (with "few" exceptions) to the strong stability when coupled with a Lamé system in a bounded domain of \(\mathbb{R}^{n}\)-- as shown by Dafermos in, no uniform decay can usually be expected (cp. ). Reducing the problem to the case of rotationally symmetric solutions, Jiang and Racke showed an exponential decay of the second-order energy, also in the nonlinear situation (cf. ). A similar result was latter obtained by Racke in for the linear 2D and 3D hyperbolic thermoelasticity. As a matter of fact, Reissner-Mindlin-Timoshenko plates and Timoshenko beams have a certain degree of similarity with Kirchhoff-Love plates and Euler-Bernoulli beams. The latter also describe the bending of an elastic plate or a beam under the assumption that the linear filaments remain perpendicular to mid-plane even after the plate's deformation. This model can be shown to be a limit (in a certain sense) of the Timoshenko model as the shear correction factor \(K \to \infty\) (cf. ). Numerous mathematical results on Kirchhoff plates are known in the literature. In his monograph, Lagnese studied various boundary feedback stabilizers furnishing uniform or strong stability for the Kirchhoff-Love plate coupled with a parabolic heat equation in a bounded domain with or without assumptions on the geometry. Avalos and Lasiecka exploited further in a multiplier technique, interpolation tools and regularity results to obtain exponential stability of a thermoelastic Kirchhoff-Love plate without any additional boundary dissipation in the presence or absense of rotational inertia. Another important development in this field was made by Lasiecka and Triggiani (see, e.g., ) who showed the analyticity of underlying semigroup for all combinations of natural boundary conditions. Implying the maximal \(L^{2}\)-regularity property, this became an important tool for studying nonlinear plates, e.g., the von Kármán model, which was done by Avalos et al. in. It should though be pointed out that this approach is not directly applicable to the case of coupling with the hyperbolic Cattaneo's heat conduction system which destroys the analyticity of the semigroup. Nonetheless, in an analogous situation of a partly hyperbolic systems such as the full von Kármán one, Lasiecka obtained the existence of weak and regular solutions and showed their uniform stability in the presense of a mechanical damping only for the solenoidal part for the in-plane displacements. A similar study has then later been carried out in by Benabdallah and Lasiecka for the full von Kármán model incorporating rotational inertia. Turning back to Reissner-Mindlin-Timoshenko plates, we once again refer to the monograph of Lagnese in which he addressed the question of uniform (in particular, exponential) and strong stabilization of purely elastic plates by the means of boundary feedbacks. For the following choice of stabilizing feedbacks on a portion \(\Gamma_{1} \neq \emptyset\) of the boundary \[\begin{aligned} \begin{split} w = \psi = \varphi &= 0 \;\;\, \text{ in } (0, \infty) \times \Gamma_{0}, \\ K(\tfrac{\partial w}{\partial \nu} + \nu_{1} \psi + \nu_{2} \varphi) &= m_{1} \text{ in } (0, \infty) \times \Gamma_{1}, \\ D(\nu_{1} \psi_{x_{1}} + \mu \nu_{1} \varphi_{x_{2}} + \tfrac{1-\mu}{2} (\psi_{x_{2}} + \varphi_{x_{1}}) \nu_{2}) &= m_{2} \text{ in } (0, \infty) \times \Gamma_{1}, \\ D(\nu_{2} \varphi_{x_{2}} + \mu \nu_{2} \psi_{x_{1}} + \tfrac{1-\mu}{2} (\psi_{x_{2}} + \varphi_{x_{1}}) \nu_{1}) &= m_{3} \text{ in } (0, \infty) \times \Gamma_{1}, \end{split} \notag \end{aligned}\] the purely elastic Reissner-Mindlin-Timoshenko plate \[\begin{aligned} \begin{split} \rho_{1} w_{tt}-K (w_{x_{1}} + \psi)_{x_{1}}-K (w_{x_{2}} + \varphi)_{x_{2}} &= 0 \text{ in } (0, \infty) \times \Omega, \\ \rho_{2} \psi_{tt}-D(\psi_{x_{1} x_{1}} + \tfrac{1-\mu}{2} \psi_{x_{2} x_{2}} + \tfrac{1 + \mu}{2} \varphi_{x_{1} x_{2}}) + K (\psi + w_{x_{1}}) + \gamma \theta_{x_{1}} + d_{1} \psi_{t} &= 0 \text{ in } (0, \infty) \times \Omega, \\ \rho_{2} \varphi_{tt}-D(\varphi_{x_{2} x_{2}} + \tfrac{1-\mu}{2} \varphi_{x_{1} x_{1}} + \tfrac{1 + \mu}{2} \psi_{x_{1} x_{2}}) + K (\varphi + w_{x_{2}}) + \gamma \theta_{x_{2}} + d_{2} \varphi_{t} &= 0 \text{ in } (0, \infty) \times \Omega \end{split} \notag \end{aligned}\] was proved to be strongly stable (i.e., the energy was shown to vanish as \(t \to \infty\)) if \(\Gamma_{0} \neq \varnothing\) und \((m_{1}, m_{2}, m_{3})' =-F (w_{t}, \psi_{t}, \varphi_{t})'\) where \(F \in L^{\infty}(\Gamma_{1}, \mathbb{R}^{3 \times 3})\) is a symmetric positive semidefinite matrix function which is additionally positive definite on a connected nontrivial portion of \(\Gamma_{1}\), etc. Under the geometric condition stating that \((\Omega, \Gamma_{0}, \Gamma_{1})\) is "star complemented---star shaped" and some additional assumptions on \(F\), even uniform stability has been shown. Similar results were also obtained by Muñoz Rivera and Portillo Oquendo in auch for the boundary conditions of memory-type \[\begin{aligned} \begin{split} w = \psi = \varphi &= 0 \text{ in } (0, \infty) \times \Gamma_{0}, \\ w + \int_{0}^{t} g_{1}(t-s) K(\tfrac{\partial w}{\partial \nu} + \nu_{1} \psi + \nu_{2} \varphi)(s) \mathrm{d} s &= 0 \text{ in } (0, \infty) \times \Gamma_{1}, \\ \psi + \int_{0}^{t} g_{1}(t-s) D(\nu_{1} \psi_{x_{1}} + \mu \nu_{1} \varphi_{x_{2}} + \tfrac{1-\mu}{2} (\psi_{x_{2}} + \varphi_{x_{1}})(s) \mathrm{d} s &= 0 \text{ in } (0, \infty) \times \Gamma_{1}, \\ \varphi + \int_{0}^{t} g_{1}(t-s) D(\nu_{2} \varphi_{x_{2}} + \mu \nu_{2} \psi_{x_{1}} + \tfrac{1-\mu}{2} (\psi_{x_{2}} + \varphi_{x_{1}}) \nu_{1})(s) \mathrm{d} s &= 0 \text{ in } (0, \infty) \times \Gamma_{1} \end{split} \notag \end{aligned}\] with exponential kernels \(g_{1}\), \(g_{2}\), \(g_{3}\). In, Fernández Sare studied a linear Reissner-Mindlin-Timoshenko plate with a damping for both angle components \[\begin{aligned} \rho_{1} w_{tt}-K (w_{x_{1}} + \psi)_{x_{1}}-K (w_{x_{2}} + \varphi)_{x_{2}} &= 0 \text{ in } (0, \infty) \times \Omega, \label{GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_ELASTISCH_1} \\ \rho_{2} \psi_{tt}-D(\psi_{x_{1} x_{1}} + \tfrac{1-\mu}{2} \psi_{x_{2} x_{2}} + \tfrac{1 + \mu}{2} \varphi_{x_{1} x_{2}}) + K (\psi + w_{x_{1}}) + \gamma \theta_{x_{1}} + d_{1} \psi_{t} &= 0 \text{ in } (0, \infty) \times \Omega, \label{GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_ELASTISCH_2} \\ \rho_{2} \varphi_{tt}-D(\varphi_{x_{2} x_{2}} + \tfrac{1-\mu}{2} \varphi_{x_{1} x_{1}} + \tfrac{1 + \mu}{2} \psi_{x_{1} x_{2}}) + K (\varphi + w_{x_{2}}) + \gamma \theta_{x_{2}} + d_{2} \varphi_{t} &= 0 \text{ in } (0, \infty) \times \Omega. \label{GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_ELASTISCH_3} \end{aligned}\] He proved that the system is polynomially stable under Dirichlet boundary conditions on all three variables. For a particular choice of boundary conditions in a rectangular configuration \(\Omega = (0, L_{1}) \times (0, L_{2})\), a resolvent criterion was exploited to show that the system is not exponentially stable. Muñoz Rivera und Racke considered in an nonlinear Timoshenko-beam coupled to a parabolic heat equation \[\begin{split} \rho_{1} \varphi_{tt}-\sigma(\varphi_{x}, \psi)_{x} &= 0 \text{ in } (0, \infty) \times (0, L), \\ \rho_{2} \psi_{tt}-b \psi_{xx} + k(\varphi_{x} + \psi) + \gamma \theta_{x} &= 0 \text{ in } (0, \infty) \times (0, L), \\ \rho_{3} \theta_{t}-\kappa \theta_{xx} + \gamma \psi_{tx} &= 0 \text{ in } (0, \infty) \times (0, L) \\ \end{split} \notag\] subject to mixed boundary conditions \(\varphi = \psi = \theta_{x} = 0\) or \(\varphi = \psi_{x} = \theta = 0\). Both in the linear case, i.e., \(\sigma(r, s) = kr + s\), and the nonlinear case, i.e., for a smooth stress function \(\sigma\) satisfying \(\nabla \sigma = (k, k)'\), \(\nabla^{2} \sigma = 0\), but in the latter case only for sufficiently small initial data, the energy was shown to decay exponentially if the condition \(\tfrac{\rho_{1}}{k} = \tfrac{\rho_{2}}{b}\) holds true. For the linear situation, this condition was even shown to be necessary for the exponential stability. It should though be pointed out that the latter proportionality condition, being mathematically fully sound, is physically not possible. Surprisingly, this result could not be carried over to the case of Cattaneo heat conduction. Namely, Fernández Sare and Racke showed in that the purely hyperbolic system \[\begin{aligned} \rho_{1} \varphi_{tt}-k(\varphi_{x} + \psi)_{x} &= 0 \text{ in } (0, \infty) \times (0, L), \label{GLEICHUNG_TIMOSHENKO_1} \\ \rho_{2} \psi_{tt}-b \psi_{xx} + k(\varphi_{x} + \psi) + \gamma \theta_{x} &= 0 \text{ in } (0, \infty) \times (0, L), \label{GLEICHUNG_TIMOSHENKO_2} \\ \rho_{3} \theta_{t} + \kappa q_{x} + \gamma \psi_{tx} &= 0 \text{ in } (0, \infty) \times (0, L), \label{GLEICHUNG_TIMOSHENKO_3} \\ \tau_{0} q_{t} + \delta q + \kappa \theta_{x} &= 0 \text{ in } (0, \infty) \times (0, L) \label{GLEICHUNG_TIMOSHENKO_4} \end{aligned}\] is not exponentially stable even under the assumption \(\tfrac{\rho_{1}}{k} = \tfrac{\rho_{2}}{b}\). This motivated Messaoudi et al. to introduce a frictional damping for the bending component. In, they replaced Equation ([\[GLEICHUNG_TIMOSHENKO_1\]](#GLEICHUNG_TIMOSHENKO_1){reference-type="ref" reference="GLEICHUNG_TIMOSHENKO_1"}) with the damped equation \[\rho_{1} \varphi_{tt}-\sigma(\varphi_{x}, \psi)_{x} + \mu \varphi_{t} = 0 \text{ in } (0, \infty) \times (0, L) \notag\] for some \(\mu > 0\). Under this additional mechanical dissipation, they proved that both linear and nonlinear systems are stable under the boundary conditions \(\varphi = \psi = q = 0\) und \(\varphi_{x} = \psi = q = 0\) independent of whether the relation \(\tfrac{\rho_{1}}{k} = \tfrac{\rho_{2}}{b}\) holds or not. The impact of thermal coupling on the strong stability of a Reissner-Mindlin-Timoshenko plate has also been studied by Grobbelaar in her papers, and. In, the author considered a stuctural 3D acoustic model with a 2D plate interface and proved a strong asymptotic stability for the radially symmetric case. A similar result was later obtained in for a rotationally symmetric Reissner-Mindlin-Timoshenko plate with hyperbolic heat conduction due to Cattaneo. To this end, both articles employed Benchimol's spectral criterion. The arguments can be directly carried over to the case of classical Fourier heat conduction being a formal limit Cattaneo's system as the relaxation parameter \(\tau \to 0\). In her recent article, Grobbelaar proved a polynimal decay rate of \(t^{-1/4}\) in the rotationally symmetric case for the Reissner-Mindlin-Timoshenko system coupled to the classical Fourier heat conduction under Dirichlet boundary conditions on \(w\) and \(\theta\) as well as free boundary conditions on \(\psi\) and \(\varphi\). In the present article, we consider the linear Reissner-Mindlin-Timosheko plate equations ([\[GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_1\]](#GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_1){reference-type="ref" reference="GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_1"})--([\[GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_5\]](#GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_5){reference-type="ref" reference="GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_5"}) in a bounded domain. The paper is structured as follows. In the first section, we exploit the semigroup theory to show that the initial-boundary value problem ([\[GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_1\]](#GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_1){reference-type="ref" reference="GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_1"})--([\[GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_5\]](#GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_5){reference-type="ref" reference="GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_5"}) subject to corresponding initial conditions as well as homogeneous Dirichlet and Neumann boundary conditions on both elastic and thermal variables on different portions of the boundary is well-posed. In the second section, we prove the lack of strong stability for this problem provided \(\Gamma\) is smooth for a particular set of boundary conditions. We further show that a mechanical damping for all three variables \(w\), \(\varphi\) and \(\psi\) leads to an exponential decay rate under Dirichlet boundary conditions for the elastic and Neumann boundary conditions for the thermal part of the system. Restricting the domain \(\Omega\) and the data to the rotationally symmetric case, we prove that a single mechanical damping on \(w\) is enough to exponentially stabilize the system. This is a generalization of Messaoudi's et al. stability results from to a multi-dimensional situation. In the appendix, we finally present a brief discussion on Bogovskiĭ operator for irrotational vector fields and show its continuity. # Existence and uniqueness of classical solutions In the following, unless specified otherwise, we assume the boundary \(\Gamma\) to be Lipschitzian and satisfy \(\Gamma = \bar{\Gamma}_{1} \cup \bar{\Gamma}_{2} = \bar{\Gamma}_{3} \cup \bar{\Gamma}_{4}\) with \(\Gamma_{1} \neq \varnothing\), \(\Gamma_{1} \cap \Gamma_{2} = \emptyset\), \(\Gamma_{3} \cap \Gamma_{4} = \emptyset\) and \(\Gamma_{k}\), \(k = 1, \dots, 4\), being relatively open. Let the plate be clamped at \(\Gamma_{1}\) and hinged at \(\Gamma_{2}\). Further, let it be held at the reference temperature on \(\Gamma_{3}\) and be thermally insulated on \(\Gamma_{4}\). Then, the boundary conditions read as \[\begin{aligned} w = \psi = \varphi &= 0 \text{ on } (0, \infty) \times \Gamma_{1}, \label{GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_RB_1} \\ K(\tfrac{\partial w}{\partial \nu} + \nu_{1} \psi + \nu_{2} \varphi) &= 0 \text{ on } (0, \infty) \times \Gamma_{2}, \label{GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_RB_2} \\ D(\nu_{1} \psi_{x_{1}} + \mu \nu_{1} \varphi_{x_{2}} + \tfrac{1-\mu}{2} (\psi_{x_{2}} + \varphi_{x_{1}}) \nu_{2})-\gamma \theta \nu_{1} &= 0 \text{ on } (0, \infty) \times \Gamma_{2}, \label{GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_RB_3} \\ D(\nu_{2} \varphi_{x_{2}} + \mu \nu_{2} \psi_{x_{1}} + \tfrac{1-\mu}{2} (\psi_{x_{2}} + \varphi_{x_{1}}) \nu_{1})-\gamma \theta \nu_{2} &= 0 \text{ on } (0, \infty) \times \Gamma_{2}, \label{GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_RB_4} \\ \theta &= 0 \text{ on } (0, \infty) \times \Gamma_{3}, \label{GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_RB_5} \\ q \cdot \nu &= 0 \text{ on } (0, \infty) \times \Gamma_{4}, \label{GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_RB_6} \end{aligned}\] where \(\nu = (\nu_{1}, \nu_{2})'\) denotes the outer unit normal vector to \(\Gamma\) and \((\cdot)'\) stands for the usial matrix transposition. Using the standard notation from the Theory of elasticity (cf. ), we introduce the generalized gradient and the corresponding boundary symbol \[\begin{aligned} \mathcal{D} := \left(\begin{array}{cc} \partial_{1} & 0 \\ 0 & \partial_{2} \\ \partial_{2} & \partial_{1} \end{array}\right), \quad \mathcal{N} := \left(\begin{array}{cc} \nu_{1} & 0 \\ 0 & \nu_{2} \\ \nu_{2} & \nu_{1} \end{array}\right), \notag \end{aligned}\] respectively. With this notation, we can easily conclude \[\begin{split} D \left(\begin{array}{c} \psi_{x_{1} x_{1}} + \tfrac{1-\mu}{2} \psi_{x_{2} x_{2}} + \tfrac{1 + \mu}{2} \varphi_{x_{1} x_{2}} \\ \varphi_{x_{2} x_{2}} + \tfrac{1-\mu}{2} \varphi_{x_{1} x_{2}} + \tfrac{1 + \mu}{2} \psi_{x_{1} x_{2}} \end{array}\right) &= \mathcal{D}' S \mathcal{D} v, \\ D \left(\begin{array}{c} \nu_{1} \psi_{x_{1}} + \mu \nu_{1} \varphi_{x_{2}} + \tfrac{1-\mu}{2} (\psi_{x_{2}} + \varphi_{x_{1}}) \nu_{2} \\ \nu_{2} \varphi_{x_{2}} + \mu \nu_{2} \psi_{x_{1}} + \tfrac{1 + \mu}{2} (\psi_{x_{2}} + \varphi_{x_{1}}) \nu_{1} \end{array}\right) &= \mathcal{N}' S \mathcal{D} v, \end{split} \notag\] where \(v := (\psi, \varphi)'\) and \[S := D \left(\begin{array}{ccc} 1 & \mu & 0 \\ \mu & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & \tfrac{1-\mu}{2} \end{array}\right). \label{GLEICHUNG_STEIFIGKEITSMATRIX}\] With \(\mu\) satisfying \(\mu \in (-1, 1)\), the symmetric matrix \(S\) is positive definite since \(\sigma(S) = \{D \tfrac{1-\mu}{2}, D (1-\mu), D (1 + \mu)\}\) due to the fact \[\det(S-\lambda I) = (D \, \tfrac{1-\mu}{2}-\lambda) ((D-\lambda)^{2}-\mu^{2} D^{2}) = (D \, \tfrac{1-\mu}{2}-\lambda) (D-\lambda-\mu D) (D-\lambda + \mu D). \notag\] By the virtue of physical condition \(\mu \in (0, \tfrac{1}{2})\), the latter is not an actual restriction. Throughout this section, we assume \(S\) to be an arbitrary symmetric, positive definite matrix, i.e., \(S \in \mathrm{SPD}(\mathbb{R}^{3})\). With the notations above, Equations ([\[GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_1\]](#GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_1){reference-type="ref" reference="GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_1"})--([\[GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_5\]](#GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_5){reference-type="ref" reference="GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_ORIGINAL_LINEAR_5"}) can be equivalently written as \[\begin{aligned} \rho_{1} w_{tt}-K \mathrm{div}\, (\nabla w + v) &= 0 \text{ in } (0, \infty) \times \Omega, \label{GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_KOMPAKTE_FORM_1} \\ \rho_{2} v_{tt}-\mathcal{D}' S\mathcal{D} v + K(v + \nabla w) + \gamma \nabla \theta &= 0 \text{ in } (0, \infty) \times \Omega, \label{GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_KOMPAKTE_FORM_2} \\ \rho_{3} \theta_{t} + \kappa \mathrm{div}\, q + \beta \theta + \gamma \mathrm{div}\, v_{t} &= 0 \text{ in } (0, \infty) \times \Omega, \label{GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_KOMPAKTE_FORM_3} \\ \tau_{0} q_{t} + \delta q + \kappa \nabla \theta &= 0 \text{ in } (0, \infty) \times \Omega \label{GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_KOMPAKTE_FORM_4} \end{aligned}\] with the boundary conditions ([\[GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_RB_1\]](#GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_RB_1){reference-type="ref" reference="GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_RB_1"})--([\[GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_RB_6\]](#GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_RB_6){reference-type="ref" reference="GLEICHUNG_REISSNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_RB_6"}) transformed to \[\begin{aligned} w = |v| &= 0 \text{ on } (0, \infty) \times \Gamma_{1}, \label{GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_KOMPAKTE_FORM_RB_1} \\ (\nabla w + v) \cdot \nu &= 0 \text{ on } (0, \infty) \times \Gamma_{2}, \label{GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_KOMPAKTE_FORM_RB_2} \\ \mathcal{N}' S \mathcal{D} v-\gamma \theta \nu &= 0 \text{ on } (0, \infty) \times \Gamma_{2}, \label{GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_KOMPAKTE_FORM_RB_3} \\ \theta &= 0 \text{ on } (0, \infty) \times \Gamma_{3}, \label{GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_KOMPAKTE_FORM_RB_4} \\ q \cdot \nu &= 0 \text{ on } (0, \infty) \times \Gamma_{4} \label{GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_KOMPAKTE_FORM_RB_5} \end{aligned}\] and initial conditions \[w(0, \cdot) = w^{0}, \; w_{t}(0, \cdot) = w^{1}, \; v(0, \cdot) = v^{0}, \; v_{t}(0, \cdot) = v^{1}, \; \theta(0, \cdot) = \theta^{0}, \; q(0, \cdot) = q^{0}, \label{GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_KOMPAKTE_FORM_AB}\] where \(v^{0} = (\psi^{0}, \varphi^{0})'\), \(v^{1} = (\psi^{1}, \varphi^{1})'\). ## Well-Posedness {#ABSCHNITT_REISSNER_MINDLIN_WOHLGESTELLTHEIT} We further exploit the semigroup theory to obtain the classical well-posedness of Reissner-Mindlin-Timoshenko equations. To this end, we transform Equations ([\[GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_KOMPAKTE_FORM_1\]](#GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_KOMPAKTE_FORM_1){reference-type="ref" reference="GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_KOMPAKTE_FORM_1"})--([\[GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_KOMPAKTE_FORM_AB\]](#GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_KOMPAKTE_FORM_AB){reference-type="ref" reference="GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_KOMPAKTE_FORM_AB"}) into the Cauchy problem \[\begin{split} \frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}t} V(t) &= \mathcal{A} V(t) \text{ f\"ur } t \in (0, \infty), \\ V(0) &= V^{0} \end{split} \notag\] on a Hilbert space \(\mathcal{H}\). According to , the latter is well-posed if and only if \(\mathcal{A}\) is an infinitesimal generator of a strongly continuous semigroup on \(\mathcal{H}\). We set \(V := (w, v, w_{t}, v_{t}, \theta, q)'\) and formally define the differential operator \[A := \rho^{-1} \left(\begin{array}{cccccccc} 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ K \triangle & K \mathrm{div}\, & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ -K \nabla & \mathcal{D}'S\mathcal{D}-K & 0 & 0 &-\gamma \nabla & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 &-\gamma \mathrm{div}\, &-\beta &-\kappa \mathrm{div}\, \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 &-\kappa \nabla &-\delta \end{array}\right) \notag\] with \(\rho := \mathrm{diag}(1, 1, \rho_{1}, \rho_{2}, \rho_{3}, \tau_{0})\). To introduce the functional analytic settings, we consider the Hilbert space \[\mathcal{H} := (H^{1}_{\Gamma_{1}}(\Omega))^{3} \times (L^{2}(\Omega))^{3} \times (L^{2}(\Omega))^{3} \notag\] equipped with the scalar product \[\begin{split} \langle V, W\rangle_{\mathcal{H}} := \;& \rho_{1} \langle V^{3}, W^{3}\rangle_{L^{2}(\Omega)} + \rho_{2} \langle V^{4}, W^{4}\rangle_{(L^{2}(\Omega))^{2}} + K \langle \nabla V^{1} + V^{2}, \nabla W^{1} + W^{2}\rangle_{(L^{2}(\Omega))^{2}} + \\ &\langle \mathcal{D} V^{2}, S \mathcal{D} W^{2}\rangle_{(L^{2}(\Omega))^{3}} + \rho_{3} \langle V^{5}, W^{5}\rangle_{(L^{2}(\Omega))^{2}} + \tau_{0} \langle V^{6}, W^{6}\rangle_{L^{2}(\Omega)}. \end{split} \notag\] Here, we define for a relatively open set \(\Gamma_{0} \subset \Gamma\) \[H^{1}_{\Gamma_{0}}(\Omega) = \mathrm{cl}\left(\{u \in \mathcal{C}^{\infty}(\Omega) \,|\, \mathrm{supp}(u) \cap \Gamma_{0} = \emptyset\}, \|\cdot\|_{H^{1}(\Omega)}\right). \notag\] Note that due to the Lipschitz continuity of \(\Gamma\), there exists a linear, continuous operator \(T \colon H^{1}(\Omega) \to H^{1/2}(\Gamma)\). Thus, the notation \(u|_{\Gamma_{0}} = 0\) is also legitimate. The following theorem implies that \(\langle \cdot, \cdot\rangle_{\mathcal{H}}\) is equivalent with the standard product topology on \(\mathcal{H}\), i.e., \(\mathcal{H}\) is complete. The proof is a direct consequence of an analogous result in (cf. also for the case of domains with a strict cone property). We introduce the operator \[\mathcal{A} \colon D(\mathcal{A}) \subset \mathcal{H} \longrightarrow \mathcal{H}, \quad V \longmapsto AV, \notag\] where \[\begin{aligned} D(\mathcal{A}) = \{V \in \mathcal{H} \,|\, &A V \in \mathcal{H}, V \text{ satisfies the generalized Neumann boundary conditions (\ref{GLEICHUNG_NEUMANN_MR_LIN_KF_1})--(\ref{GLEICHUNG_NEUMANN_MR_LIN_KF_3})}\} \notag \\ = \{V \in \mathcal{H} \,|\, &V^{1}, V^{3} \in H^{1}_{\Gamma_{1}(\Omega)}, V^{2}, V^{4} \in (H^{1}_{\Gamma_{1}(\Omega)})^{2}, \triangle V^{1} \in L^{2}(\Omega), \mathcal{D}^{T} S \mathcal{D} V^{2} \in (L^{2}(\Omega))^{2}, \notag \\ &V^{5} \in H^{1}_{\Gamma_{3}}(\Omega), \mathrm{div}\, V^{6} \in L^{2}(\Omega), \notag \\ &V \text{ satisfies the generalized Neumann boundary conditions (\ref{GLEICHUNG_NEUMANN_MR_LIN_KF_1})--(\ref{GLEICHUNG_NEUMANN_MR_LIN_KF_3})}\} \notag \end{aligned}\] with the generalized Neumann boundary conditions given by \[\begin{aligned} \langle \triangle V^{1} + \mathrm{div}\, V^{2}, \phi\rangle_{L^{2}(\Omega)} + \langle \nabla V^{1} + V^{2}, \nabla \phi \rangle_{(L^{2}(\Omega))^{2}} &= 0 \text{ for all } \phi \in H^{1}_{\Gamma_{1}}(\Omega) \label{GLEICHUNG_NEUMANN_MR_LIN_KF_1} \\ \langle \mathcal{D}^{T} S \mathcal{D} V^{2}-\gamma \nabla V^{5}, \phi\rangle_{(L^{2}(\Omega))^{2}} + \langle S \mathcal{D} V^{2}, \mathcal{D} \phi \rangle_{(L^{2}(\Omega))^{3}} & \notag \\ -\gamma \langle V^{5}, \mathrm{div}\, \phi \rangle_{L^{2}(\Omega)} &= 0 \text{ for all } \phi \in (H^{1}_{\Gamma_{1}}(\Omega))^{2} \label{GLEICHUNG_NEUMANN_MR_LIN_KF_2} \\ \langle \mathrm{div}\, V^{6}, \phi\rangle_{L^{2}(\Omega)} + \langle V^{6}, \nabla \phi\rangle_{(L^{2}(\Omega))^{2}} &= 0 \text{ for all } \phi \in H^{1}_{\Gamma_{3}}(\Omega). \label{GLEICHUNG_NEUMANN_MR_LIN_KF_3} \end{aligned}\] Obviously, \(D(\mathcal{A})\) is a linear subspace of \(\mathcal{H}\). Thus, \[V_{t} = \mathcal{A} V, \quad V(0) = V^{0} \label{REISSNER_MINDLIN_EVOLUTIONSPROBLEM}\] is a generalization of ([\[GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_KOMPAKTE_FORM_1\]](#GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_KOMPAKTE_FORM_1){reference-type="ref" reference="GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_KOMPAKTE_FORM_1"})--([\[GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_KOMPAKTE_FORM_AB\]](#GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_KOMPAKTE_FORM_AB){reference-type="ref" reference="GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_KOMPAKTE_FORM_AB"}) since any classically differentiable solution to ([\[GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_KOMPAKTE_FORM_1\]](#GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_KOMPAKTE_FORM_1){reference-type="ref" reference="GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_KOMPAKTE_FORM_1"})--([\[GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_KOMPAKTE_FORM_AB\]](#GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_KOMPAKTE_FORM_AB){reference-type="ref" reference="GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_KOMPAKTE_FORM_AB"}) solves the abstract Cauchy problem ([\[REISSNER_MINDLIN_EVOLUTIONSPROBLEM\]](#REISSNER_MINDLIN_EVOLUTIONSPROBLEM){reference-type="ref" reference="REISSNER_MINDLIN_EVOLUTIONSPROBLEM"}). Here, \(V^{0} := (w^{0}, v^{0}, w^{1}, v^{1}, \theta^{0}, q^{0})'\) is assumed to be an element of \(D(\mathcal{A})\). The following theorem characterizes \(\mathcal{A}\) as an infinitesimal generator of a strongly continuous semigroup of bounded linear operators on \(\mathcal{H}\). We can now apply the theorem of Lumer & Phillips to the Cauchy problem ([\[REISSNER_MINDLIN_EVOLUTIONSPROBLEM\]](#REISSNER_MINDLIN_EVOLUTIONSPROBLEM){reference-type="ref" reference="REISSNER_MINDLIN_EVOLUTIONSPROBLEM"}) to obtain the following existence result. # Exponential stability In this section, we study the stability properties of Equations ([\[GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_KOMPAKTE_FORM_1\]](#GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_KOMPAKTE_FORM_1){reference-type="ref" reference="GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_KOMPAKTE_FORM_1"})--([\[GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_KOMPAKTE_FORM_4\]](#GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_KOMPAKTE_FORM_4){reference-type="ref" reference="GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_KOMPAKTE_FORM_4"}) subject to Dirichlet boundary conditions for the elastic part and Neumann boundary conditions for the thermal part in two situations. First, we look at the case of a frictional damping on all elastic variables. Second, we restrict ourselves to the rotationally symmetric situation but retain only the frictional damping for the bending component \(w\). For a number \(d \geq 0\) and a symmetric, positive semidefinite matrix \(D \in \mathbb{R}^{3 \times 3}\), we consider thus the problem \[\begin{aligned} \rho_{1} w_{tt}-K \mathrm{div}\, (v + \nabla w) + d w_{t} &= 0 \text{ in } (0, \infty) \times \Omega, \label{GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_MECHANISCH_GEDAEMPFT_1} \\ \rho_{2} v_{tt}-\mathcal{D}' S \mathcal{D} v + K (v + \nabla w) + \gamma \nabla \theta + D v_{t} &= 0 \text{ in } (0, \infty) \times \Omega, \label{GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_MECHANISCH_GEDAEMPFT_2} \\ \rho_{3} \theta_{t} + \kappa \mathrm{div}\, q + \beta \theta + \gamma \mathrm{div}\, v_{t} &= 0 \text{ in } (0, \infty) \times \Omega, \label{GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_MECHANISCH_GEDAEMPFT_3} \\ \tau_{0} q_{t} + \delta q + \kappa \nabla \theta &= 0 \text{ in } (0, \infty) \times \Omega \label{GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_MECHANISCH_GEDAEMPFT_4} \end{aligned}\] subject to the boundary conditions \[\begin{aligned} w = |v| &= 0 \text{ on } (0, \infty) \times \Gamma, \label{GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_MECHANISCH_GEDAEMPFT_RB_1} \\ q \cdot \nu &= 0 \text{ on } (0, \infty) \times \Gamma \label{GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_MECHANISCH_GEDAEMPFT_RB_2} \end{aligned}\] and the initial conditions \[w(0, \cdot) = w^{0}, \; w_{t}(0, \cdot) = w^{1}, \; v(0, \cdot) = v^{0}, \; v_{t}(0, \cdot) = v^{1}, \; \theta(0, \cdot) = \theta^{0}, \; q(0, \cdot) = q^{0}, \label{GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_MECHANISCH_GEDAEMPFT_AB}\] Despite of the notation abuse, the matrix \(D \in \mathrm{SPD}(\mathbb{R}^{3})\) should not be confused with constant \(D > 0\) consituting the matrix \(S\). The natural first order energy associated with ([\[GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_MECHANISCH_GEDAEMPFT_1\]](#GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_MECHANISCH_GEDAEMPFT_1){reference-type="ref" reference="GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_MECHANISCH_GEDAEMPFT_1"})--([\[GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_MECHANISCH_GEDAEMPFT_4\]](#GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_MECHANISCH_GEDAEMPFT_4){reference-type="ref" reference="GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_MECHANISCH_GEDAEMPFT_4"}) reads as \[\mathcal{E}(t) := \tfrac{\rho_{1}}{2} \|w_{t}\|_{L^{2}(\Omega)}^{2} + \tfrac{\rho_{2}}{2} \|v_{t}\|_{(L^{2}(\Omega))^{2}}^{2} + \tfrac{1}{2} \|\sqrt{S} \mathcal{D} v\|_{(L^{2}(\Omega))^{3}}^{2} + \tfrac{K}{2} \|v + \nabla w\|_{(L^{2}(\Omega))^{2}}^{2} + \tfrac{\rho_{3}}{2} \|\theta\|_{L^{2}(\Omega)}^{2} + \tfrac{\tau_{0}}{2} \|q\|_{(L^{2}(\Omega))^{2}}. \notag\] ## Full mechanical and thermal damping First, we address the case of a full mechanical and thermal damping, i.e., \(d > 0\), \(D \in \mathrm{SPD}(\mathbb{R}^{2})\), \(\beta > 0\). Analogous results for the equations of thermoelasticity with a mechanical damping were proved by Racke in for the case of parabolic heat conduction and by Ritter in for the case of hyperbolic heat conduction due to Cattaneo. ## Lack of strong stability in smooth domains To justify the necessity of a frictional damping for both \(w\) and \(v\), we prove next that Equations ([\[GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_MECHANISCH_GEDAEMPFT_1\]](#GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_MECHANISCH_GEDAEMPFT_1){reference-type="ref" reference="GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_MECHANISCH_GEDAEMPFT_1"})--([\[GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_MECHANISCH_GEDAEMPFT_AB\]](#GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_MECHANISCH_GEDAEMPFT_AB){reference-type="ref" reference="GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_MECHANISCH_GEDAEMPFT_AB"}) even lack a strong stability for \(d > 0\) and \(D = 0\) when considered in a bounded domain \(\Omega\) with a smooth boundary \(\Gamma\). In this case, the domain \(\Omega\) contains a ray of geometrical optics perpendicularly reflected from \(\Gamma\) and one could theoretically perform constructions similar to those in or to prove a non-uniform decay rate even for a bigger class of domains. For simplicity, we restrict ourselves to the case of a smooth boundary allowing for the definition of Helmholz projection. We will namely show the imposibility of stabilizing the solenoidal part of \(v\). To avoid a trivial null space, we impose for simplicity the following boundary conditions: \[\begin{aligned} w = |v| &= 0 \text{ on } (0, \infty) \times \Gamma, \label{GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_MECHANISCH_TEILWEISE_GEDAEMPFT_RB_1} \\ \theta &= 0 \text{ on } (0, \infty) \times \Gamma. \label{GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_MECHANISCH_TEILWEISE_GEDAEMPFT_RB_2} \end{aligned}\] It should though be pointed out that a similar result would also hold under any natural boundary conditions on \(w\), \(\theta\) and \(q\) provided Dirichlet boundary conditions are imposed on \(v\) on the whole of \(\Gamma\). ## Exponential stability for rotationally symmetric plates As we have seen before, a single frictional damping for \(w\) is not sufficiently strong to stabilize a thermoelastic Reissner-Mindlin-Timoshenko plate ([\[GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_MECHANISCH_GEDAEMPFT_1\]](#GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_MECHANISCH_GEDAEMPFT_1){reference-type="ref" reference="GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_MECHANISCH_GEDAEMPFT_1"})--([\[GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_MECHANISCH_GEDAEMPFT_4\]](#GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_MECHANISCH_GEDAEMPFT_4){reference-type="ref" reference="GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_MECHANISCH_GEDAEMPFT_4"}) for general data. Motivated by Racke's result in, we reduce the problem to the rotationally symmetric case making thus the vector field \(v\) irrotational. Though arguments similar to those of Jiang and Racke in and Racke in made for the system of classical or hyperbolic thermoelasticity could be adopted in our case, we decided to propose our own approach incorporating the Bogovskiĭ operator and, to some extent, being a generalization of the method applied by Messaoudi et al. in to a one-dimensional Timoshenko-beam. In addition to its technical novelty, a direct benefit of our approach lies in the fact that we only need to consider a first and not a second order energy. We would like to mention that the spectral approach of Grobbelaar (cf. ) seems also to be applicable to our problem. At the same time, we do not require the assumption of simple connectedness on \(\Omega\). We study Equations ([\[GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_MECHANISCH_GEDAEMPFT_1\]](#GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_MECHANISCH_GEDAEMPFT_1){reference-type="ref" reference="GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_MECHANISCH_GEDAEMPFT_1"})--([\[GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_MECHANISCH_GEDAEMPFT_4\]](#GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_MECHANISCH_GEDAEMPFT_4){reference-type="ref" reference="GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_MECHANISCH_GEDAEMPFT_4"}) subject to the boundary conditions \[\begin{aligned} w = |v| &= 0 \text{ on } (0, \infty) \times \Gamma, \label{GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_MECHANISCH_GEDAEMPFT_RADIAL_RB_1} \\ q \cdot \nu &= 0 \text{ on } (0, \infty) \times \Gamma \label{GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_MECHANISCH_GEDAEMPFT_RADIAL_RB_2} \end{aligned}\] and the initial conditions \[w(0, \cdot) = w^{0}, \; w_{t}(0, \cdot) = w^{1}, \; v(0, \cdot) = v^{0}, \; v_{t}(0, \cdot) = v^{1}, \; \theta(0, \cdot) = \theta^{0}, \; q(0, \cdot) = q^{0}. \label{GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_MECHANISCH_GEDAEMPFT_RADIAL_AB}\] For the solution given in Theorem [\[SATZ_WOHLGESTELLTHEIT\]](#SATZ_WOHLGESTELLTHEIT){reference-type="ref" reference="SATZ_WOHLGESTELLTHEIT"}, we assume the vanishing mean value for \(\theta\) \[\int_{\Omega} \theta \mathrm{d} x = 0 \text{ in } (0, \infty) \label{GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_MECHANISCH_GEDAEMPFT_MITTELWERTBEDINGUNG_THETA}\] as well as the vanishing rotation for \(v\) \[\mathrm{rot} v = \partial_{2} v_{1}-\partial_{1} v_{2} = 0 \text{ in } (0, \infty). \label{GLEICHUNG_REISNNER_MINDLIN_LINEAR_MECHANISCH_GEDAEMPFT_ROTATIONSFREIHEIT}\] In the following, we assume \(n = 2\). We define the space \[H^{1}_{0, \mathrm{rot}}(\Omega) = \big\{u \in (H^{1}_{0}(\Omega))^{2} \,|\, \nabla u = (\nabla u)'\big\} = \big\{u \in (H^{1}_{0}(\Omega))^{2} \,|\, \mathrm{rot} u = 0 \big\} \notag\] equipped with the standard inner product of \((H^{1}_{0}(\Omega))^{2}\). Since \(H^{1}_{0, \mathrm{rot}}(\Omega)\) is a closed subspace of \((H^{1}_{0}(\Omega))^{2}\), \(H^{1}_{0, \mathrm{rot}}(\Omega)\) is a Hilbert space. We prove the following theorem. Let us now consider a vector field \(u \in (H^{1}(\Omega))^{2}\) with \(u \cdot \nu = 0\) on \(\Gamma\). Unfortunately, the identity \[\mathcal{B}_{\mathrm{rot}} \mathrm{div}\, u = u \notag\] does not hold in general since \(u\) is not necessarily an element of \(H^{1}_{0, \mathrm{rot}}(\Omega)\). Nevertheless, the following estimate holds true. :::

{'timestamp': '2014-01-23T02:09:00', 'yymm': '1401', 'arxiv_id': '1401.5669', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5669'}

# Introduction Star counts in the direction of the Andromeda galaxy (M31) have shown that it is embedded in a large, complex stellar halo with significant substructure (Ibata et al. 2001; McConnachie et al. 2009). Such halos are thought to be comprised of the debris of shredded satellite galaxies (Searle & Zinn 1978; Newberg et al. 2002; McConnachie et al. 2009), and their existence around luminous spiral galaxies is a central prediction of galaxy formation models (Bullock & Johnston 2005; Abadi, Navarro, & Steinmetz 2006; Purcell, Bullock, & Zentner 2008; Johnston et al. 2008; Cooper et al. 2010; Martı́nez-Delgado et al. 2010; Cooper et al. 2013). Testing these predictions for large samples of galaxies is difficult, as star count studies are limited to relatively small distances (Barker et al. 2009; Tanaka et al. 2011). A solution to this problem is to study tidal features and stellar halos in integrated light rather than star counts, as the integrated surface brightness is independent of distance[^1] (see, e.g., Mihos et al. 2005; van Dokkum 2005; Tal et al. 2009; Martı́nez-Delgado et al. 2010; Atkinson, Abraham, & Ferguson 2013). However, conventional reflecting telescopes cannot reliably observe low surface brightness emission below \(\mu_B \sim 29\) mag arcsec\(^{-2}\) due to systematic errors in flat fielding and the complex point spread functions of stars (see Slater, Harding, & Mihos 2009, for an in-depth discussion of these issues). The Dragonfly Telephoto Array (Abraham & van Dokkum 2013) is a new class of telescope that is optimized for detecting spatially-extended low surface brightness emission. The prototype Dragonfly telescope consists of eight Canon EF 400 mm f/2.8L IS II USM telephoto lenses on a common mount. Telephoto lenses have no central obstruction and are optimally baffled. Furthermore, the specific lenses used in the array are of superb optical quality, partially owing to nano-fabricated sub-wavelength corrugations on their anti-reflecting coatings. As we show in Abraham & van Dokkum (2013) the Dragonfly point spread function has an order of magnitude less scattered light than the best reflecting telescopes. By combining eight lenses that image the same area of sky we built a "compound eye" that acts as a 40 cm f/1.0 refractor. In its default configuration, four of the lenses are equipped with SDSS \(g\)-band filters and four with SDSS \(r\) filters. The pixel scale is \(2.8''\) and the angular field covered by each camera is \(2.6^{\circ}\times 1.9^{\circ}\). In this *Letter* we present the first results from Dragonfly: a study of the stellar halo of the well-known galaxy M101 (a.k.a. the Pinwheel Galaxy). With a distance of 7 Mpc (Lee & Jang 2012), an absolute magnitude \(r=-21.5\), and a stellar mass of \(\approx 5 \times 10^{10}\)  (see § 4), M101 is one of the nearest massive spiral galaxies. M101 has been the subject of many detailed studies (e.g., van der Hulst & Sancisi 1988; Kenney, Scoville, & Wilson 1991; Kennicutt, Bresolin, & Garnett 2003; Mihos et al. 2012), including one of the deepest photometric investigations of the outskirts of galaxies beyond the Local Group done so far (Mihos et al. 2013). # Observations and Reduction Dragonfly is located at the New Mexico Skies observatory in Mayhill, NM. It is robotic and operates in a semi-autonomous way. A total of 35 hours of observations were obtained in 13 nights in May and June 2013. A typical M101 observing sequence consisted of nine dithered 600 s exposures with all eight cameras. The size of the dither box was typically \(50' \times 50'\). As we have four slightly offset cameras per filter this provides 36 independent lines of sight per filter for each 1.5 hr of observing time. Sky flats were taken at the beginning of each night and darks were taken throughout each night. The data reduction followed standard procedures for imaging data, taking care to preserve the large scale faint structure in the images. After initial dark subtraction and flat fielding with night-specific calibration frames a low-order illumination correction was applied, created from a large number of dithered observations over many nights. Each frame was also corrected for the 1 %--2 % gradient in the night sky emission across the field-of-view (see Garstang 1989), by subtracting a tilted plane. Combined \(g\) and \(r\) images were created for each night, using optimal weighting. The 13 images of all nights were combined for each filter, again using optimal weighting. The reduced, combined \(g\)-band image is shown in Fig. [\[full.fig\]](#full.fig){reference-type="ref" reference="full.fig"}a. The background in the images shows large scale variation at a level of \(\approx 0.2\) % (peak-to-peak) over the \(3.3^{\circ}\times 2.8^{\circ}\) field (see Fig. [\[full.fig\]](#full.fig){reference-type="ref" reference="full.fig"}a). As this background is independent of camera orientation and variations in the dither pattern it is most likely Galactic cirrus emission,[^2] at levels of \(\gtrsim 30\) mag arcsec\(^{-2}\). This large scale background was removed by fitting a third-order polynomial to a background image determined with SExtractor, aggressively masking M101 and other objects in the field. In the analysis of the surface brightness profile of M101 the average subtracted background value in a particular radial bin was added in quadrature to the uncertainty in the measured surface brightness in that bin. Stars were removed by modeling their spatially-varying point spread function (PSF). First, large numbers of bright but unsaturated stars were used to construct average PSFs in image sections. These PSFs were then interpolated so that a PSF can be constructed for any location in the image. Next, the wings of the PSF were modeled by averaging saturated stars over the entire image. Care was taken to mask neighboring stars in an iterative way when doing the averaging, both when determining the spatially-dependent inner parts of the PSF and when constructing its wings. The background-and star-subtracted \(g\)-band image is shown in Fig. [\[full.fig\]](#full.fig){reference-type="ref" reference="full.fig"}b. # The Surface Brightness Profile of M101 The central \(44' \times 44'\) of the star-subtracted \(g\)-band image, binned to a scale of \(6''\) per pixel, is shown in Fig. [\[full.fig\]](#full.fig){reference-type="ref" reference="full.fig"}c. The image shows the outer spiral arms of M101, including the faint extensions to the East that were first identified by Mihos et al. (2013). This emission, which corresponds to spiral structure seen in neutral Hydrogen emission (Walter et al. 2008; Mihos et al. 2012, 2013), has a surface brightness of \(\mu_g \sim 29\) mag arcsec\(^{-2}\). We do not see coherent faint emission at larger radii. The surface brightness of M101 falls off rapidly outside of the area defined by the spiral arms, and we see no evidence for an extended stellar halo or features such as M31's "giant stream" (Ibata et al. 2001). We quantify this visual impression with the projected surface brightness profile, shown in Fig. [\[sbprof.fig\]](#sbprof.fig){reference-type="ref" reference="sbprof.fig"}a. The profile was determined by averaging the flux in circular annuli at increasing distance from the center of the galaxy. The profile reaches \(\mu_g \sim 32\) mag arcsec\(^{-2}\) at \(R\approx 40\) kpc, and there is no evidence for an upturn that might have indicated a regime where light from the stellar halo dominates over that of the disk. The \(g-r\) color profile is shown in Fig. [\[sbprof.fig\]](#sbprof.fig){reference-type="ref" reference="sbprof.fig"}b. The galaxy becomes progressively bluer at larger radii. The grey line in Fig. [\[sbprof.fig\]](#sbprof.fig){reference-type="ref" reference="sbprof.fig"}a shows the surface brightness profile measured by Mihos et al. (2013), converted from \(\mu_B\) to \(\mu_g\) using their \(B-V\) profile and Eq. 23 in Fukugita et al. (1996). Within \(R = 15\) kpc the datasets agree to \(\lesssim 0.05\) mag. At \(R=20-30\) kpc there is a discrepancy, which is caused by a difference in methodology: Mihos et al. (2013) determined the median flux in each radial bin (C. Mihos, priv. comm.), whereas we use the mean. The mean and median are different at radial distances where the NE spiral arm is prominent. The grey line in the bottom panel of Fig. [\[sbprof.fig\]](#sbprof.fig){reference-type="ref" reference="sbprof.fig"} shows the \(B-V\) profile of Mihos et al. (2013), converted to \(g-r\) (Fukugita et al. 1996). The profiles are offset by \(\Delta(g-r) = 0.08\pm 0.05\), where the error bar reflects the uncertainty in our zeropoint determinations only. Assuming a similar uncertainty in the Mihos et al. (2013) zeropoints and/or their conversions to standard filters, the difference is not significant. # Mass Density Profile and Constraints on the M101 Stellar Halo ## Construction of the Mass Density Profile We quantify the contribution of the stellar halo to the total mass of M101 by fitting the radial profile of M101. We first convert the observed surface brightness profile to a radial mass density profile. This step is important as M101 has a strong color gradient (Fig. 2b), and the mass-to-light (\(M/L\)) ratio correlates with color (Bell & de Jong 2001). We use the following relation between surface brightness and stellar surface density density: \[\label{mlcol.eq} \log(\rho)=-0.4(\mu_g-29.23) + 1.49(g-r) + 4.58,\] with \(\mu_g\) in mag arcsec\(^{-2}\) and \(\rho\) in \(M_{\odot}\) kpc\(^{-2}\). Equation [\[mlcol.eq\]](#mlcol.eq){reference-type="ref" reference="mlcol.eq"} was determined from the observed relation between rest-frame \(g-r\) color and \(M/L_g\) ratio for galaxies with \(0.045<z<0.055\), \(10<\log(M/M_{\odot}) < 10.7\), and \(0.2< (g-r) <1.2\) in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey DR7 (as provided by the MPA-JHU release; Brinchmann et al. 2004). The MPA-JHU relation between \(M/L_g\) and \(g-r\) has a scatter of 0.12 dex and assumes a Chabrier (2003) IMF. Instead of the observed colors, which have large uncertainties at \(R>20\) kpc, we used a fit of the form \[(g-r) = \begin{cases}-0.32\log(R)+0.67, & \mbox{if }R\leq 29\,\mbox{kpc} \\ 0.20, & \mbox{if }R>29\,\mbox{kpc.} \end{cases}\] This fit is indicated by the broken green line in Fig. 2b. The mass density profile is shown in Fig. [\[massdens.fig\]](#massdens.fig){reference-type="ref" reference="massdens.fig"}. The form is similar to the surface brightness profile, except for the central regions as those are more prominent in mass than in blue light. The data reach surface densities of \(\lesssim 10^4\)  kpc\(^{-2}\), and a non-parametric limit on the stellar halo of M101 is that it has a stellar mass density lower than this limit at \(R\gtrsim 50\) kpc. ## Fitting The profile is well-described by an exponential disk and a Sersic (1968) bulge. This fit has the form \[\rho(R) = \rho_{0,d} \exp\left(\frac{R}{R_d}\right) + \rho_{0,b} \exp\left[-4.85 \left(\frac{R}{R_e}\right)^{1/n}\right],\] with \(\rho_{0,d} = (4.40\pm 0.11) \times 10^8\)  kpc\(^{-2}\), \(R_d = 3.98 \pm 0.06\) kpc, \(\rho_{0,b} = (2.24 \pm 0.08) \times 10^{10}\)  kpc\(^{-2}\), \(R_e = 1.67 \pm 0.12\) kpc, and \(n=2.62 \pm 0.16\). The fit is shown by the red solid line in Fig. [\[massdens.fig\]](#massdens.fig){reference-type="ref" reference="massdens.fig"}a. We note that the "bulge" may in fact be more appropriately called an inner disk; as is well known M101 has a very low central velocity dispersion and spiral arms that continue into the central few arcsec (Kormendy et al. 2010). The residuals from the fit are shown below panel a of Fig. [\[massdens.fig\]](#massdens.fig){reference-type="ref" reference="massdens.fig"}. They are \(<0.1\) dex at \(R=0-40\) kpc and within the \(1\sigma\) error bars at larger radii, confirming that there is no significant upturn in the profile. We quantify the contribution of a halo component by fitting the residuals. To parameterize the halo we adopt model "U" in the Courteau et al. (2011) analysis of the M31 light profile (their preferred model). This model is a power law: \[\label{halo.eq} \rho(R) = \rho_{0,h} \left[ \frac{1+(30/a_h)^2}{1+(R/a_h)^2}\right]^{\alpha}.\] The values of \(a_h\) and \(\alpha\) are fixed to the best fits for M31, \(a_h = 5.20\) kpc and \(\alpha=1.26\) (see Table 4 of Courteau et al. 2011). Fitting the normalization (i.e., the halo surface density at 30 kpc) gives \(\rho_{0,h} = 7^{+13}_{-7} \times 10^{3}\)  kpc\(^{-2}\). The combined disk + bulge + halo model is shown by the red line in Fig. [\[massdens.fig\]](#massdens.fig){reference-type="ref" reference="massdens.fig"}b. The total mass implied by this model of M101, integrated to \(R=200\) kpc, is \(M_{\rm tot,*}= 5.3^{+1.7}_{-1.3}\times 10^{10}\) . The halo mass is \(M_{\rm halo}= 1.7^{+3.4}_{-1.7}\times 10^{8}\) , and we infer that the fraction of mass in the halo is \(f_{\rm halo} = M_{\rm halo} / M_{\rm tot,*} = 0.003^{+0.006}_{-0.003}\). This fraction is significantly lower than the halo fraction of M31: Courteau et al. (2011) find \(f_{\rm halo} \sim 0.04\) using the same decomposition method. We illustrate this difference in Fig. [\[massdens.fig\]](#massdens.fig){reference-type="ref" reference="massdens.fig"}c, where we show what M101's profile would look like if the galaxy had a 4 %, M31-like halo. Such halos are clearly inconsistent with the data. # Discussion We have measured the surface brightness profile of M101 to \(\sim 18\) disk scale lengths and to surface brightness levels \(\mu_g \sim 32\) mag arcsec\(^{-2}\). We do not find evidence for the presence of a stellar halo, or more precisely for a photometric component at large radii that can be distinguished from the disk. Taking the halo profile of M31 as a model and fitting the normalization, we find a halo fraction of \(f_{\rm halo}=0.003^{+0.006}_{-0.003}\). This fraction is lower than that of M31 (\(f_{\rm halo} \sim 4\) %; Courteau et al. 2011) and also the Milky Way (\(f_{\rm halo} \sim 2\) %; Carollo et al. 2010; Courteau et al. 2011). In Fig. [\[halofrac.fig\]](#halofrac.fig){reference-type="ref" reference="halofrac.fig"} we show the relation between stellar halo fraction and galaxy stellar mass. The stellar masses of the Milky Way and M31 were taken from McMillan (2011) and Tamm et al. (2012) respectively. For comparison, we show the relation between the accreted fraction of stars and galaxy stellar mass as predicted by numerical models that trace the light of accreted satellites in dark matter halos. This relation was derived from the data in Fig. 12b of Cooper et al. (2013) for bulge-to-total ratios \(B/T<0.9\); the relation for other \(B/T\) limits is very similar. Interestingly, the stellar halo masses of all three galaxies are below the predicted relation, with M101 a factor of \(\sim 10\) below the median expectation. We caution, however, that stellar halo masses are not measured in a self-consistent way in such comparisons. There is no universal definition of a stellar halo, and it is unclear whether it even makes sense to model it as a single component (see, e.g., Carollo et al. 2010). From a practical perspective it is perhaps most fruitful to test the model predictions by comparing the predicted and observed radial surface density profiles directly, or by fitting a model such as Eq. [\[halo.eq\]](#halo.eq){reference-type="ref" reference="halo.eq"} with only the normalization as a free parameter. In this context it is interesting to note that the Cooper et al. (2010, 2013) models predict that stellar halos begin to dominate at \(R\sim 20\) kpc and surface densities \(\rho \sim 10^5\)  kpc\(^{-2}\)--again inconsistent with the M101 observations (but not with M31). Given the stochastic nature of accretion events and, as a consequence, the large scatter predicted in the \(f_{\rm halo}-M_{\rm tot,*}\) relation (Purcell et al. 2008; Cooper et al. 2013; Fig. 4), it is important to build up a sample of galaxies with radial profiles reaching surface densities of \(\sim 10^4\)  kpc\(^{-2}\). Star counts with the Gemini telescope (Bland-Hawthorn et al. 2005), the Subaru telescope (Tanaka et al. 2011) and the Hubble Space Telescope (Barker et al. 2009; Radburn-Smith et al. 2011; Monachesi et al. 2013) have reached depths of \(\gtrsim 30\) mag arcsec\(^{-2}\) but only for very nearby, low mass galaxies. Reaching those limits at distances beyond \(\sim 5\) Mpc is exceedingly difficult as the apparent brightness of stars decreases with the square of their distance. By contrast, the integrated-light surface brightness is independent of distance, and low surface brightness-optimized telescopes such as Dragonfly can study galaxies out to the Virgo cluster and beyond.[^3] This makes it possible to construct complete samples and search for correlations of \(f_{\rm halo}\) with other galaxy parameters. As an example, elliptical galaxies and spiral galaxies likely had different accretion histories (e.g., Guedes et al. 2011; Tal & van Dokkum 2011; Cooper et al. 2013; van Dokkum et al. 2013). Finally, we note that halos can also be identified by their substructure, as it reflects the detailed accretion history of a galaxy (see, e.g., Fardal et al. 2008, for a discussion on M31). This history is not very informative for an individual galaxy but a large sample can provide very strong constraints on galaxy formation models (Johnston et al. 2008). To illustrate the capabilities of the Dragonfly Telephoto Array in this context, we created a simulated Dragonfly image of M31 by redshifting this galaxy to the distance of M101 (Fig. [\[m31.fig\]](#m31.fig){reference-type="ref" reference="m31.fig"}). The M31 observations that were used are a combination of a Dragonfly image taken on 26 June 2013 and star count data from PAndAS (McConnachie et al. 2009; Carlberg et al. 2011). The star counts go out very far from the center of M31 but they are incomplete at small radii due to crowding. Following a similar procedure to that described in Irwin et al. (2005) Dragonfly data at \(R>0.7^{\circ}\) were used to tie the star count data to the integrated-light data. The combined Dragonfly + PAndAS image was redshifted to 7.0 Mpc and placed in a relatively empty region of the full-field M101 image (see Fig. [\[full.fig\]](#full.fig){reference-type="ref" reference="full.fig"}b). This last step ensures that the noise characteristics and artifacts from the reduction are identical to the M101 data. As the scaling is identical to Fig. [\[full.fig\]](#full.fig){reference-type="ref" reference="full.fig"}c the actual Dragonfly image of M101 can be compared directly to the simulated Dragonfly image of M31. Prominent features in the M31 halo (see Fig. 1 in Ferguson et al. 2005) are labeled in Fig. [\[m31.fig\]](#m31.fig){reference-type="ref" reference="m31.fig"}. Remarkably, these features are all clearly visible, including the famous giant stream first identified by Ibata et al. (2001). It has been known for many decades that dramatic tidal features can be detected in integrated light; telescopes such as Dragonfly are now enabling us to detect the subtle relics of galaxy formation that should be present around every \(\gtrsim L_*\) galaxy. [^1]: This is only true for distances where the \((1+z)^4\) cosmological surface brightness dimming is unimportant. [^2]: Some independent support for this comes from the IRAS \(100\,\mu\)m image of the M101 field, which shows a broadly similar morphology (e.g., Zagury, Boulanger, & Banchet 1999). [^3]: Bland-Hawthorn et al. (2005) have pointed out that scattered light off dust grains can contribute to integrated-light measurements at very faint levels for very compact galaxies; this should not be a concern for M101.

{'timestamp': '2014-01-23T02:00:19', 'yymm': '1401', 'arxiv_id': '1401.5467', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5467'}

# Introduction  A classical problem in electric circuit is the computation of the resistance between two nodes in a resistor network (some relevant references may be found in ). Calculating the resistance using the traditional analysis methods, such as the Kirchhoff's laws, can be done in principle for any given network, however, with the growing number of nodes, the number of equations to solve growths very rapidly. Most of resistance computations in the past are carried out for infinite networks using the Green's function technique.   In 2004, Wu proposed a new formulation of finite resistor networks that gives a formula for the two-point resistance (effective resistance) in terms of the eigenvalues and the eigenvectors of the Laplacian matrix. This formula may be used to compute the effective resistance of the one-dimensional lattice, two-dimensional network and higher-dimensional lattices. Known results for infinite networks may be obtained by taking the infinite-size limit.\ It has been known for sometime now, that electrical networks and random walks are closely related. They are connected through the effective resistance of an electrical network. One of the interesting parameter that characterizes and give information about random walks is the first passage time ( FPT ), or the hitting time, this is the expected time to hit a target node for the first time for a walker starting from a source node. Also, other quantities of interests to know are the mean first passage time (MFPT) and the commute time (the random round tripe between two nodes). The close link between the effective resistance and the commute time of a random walker on the graph was established in. Therefore, the effective resistance provides an alternative way to compute the FPT.   In this paper, the resistor electrical network is a connected, undirected graph \(G=(V, E)\), with vertex set \(V=(1,2.\cdots N)\) and edge set \(E\) in which each edge \(ij\) has a resistance \(r_{xy}=1\). An interesting invariant quantity related to the effective resistance of a graph \(G\), is the total effective resistance of \(G\), denoted by \(R(G)\), it is called the Kirchhoff's index this is the analogue of the Wiener index \(W(G)\) of a graph \(G\). This quantity tuns out to be connected to the MFPT.   For a given graph \(G\), it is not always possible to get closed formula for the effective resistance of graphs, however, for certain graphs with symmetries like the undirected circulant graphs, this may be possible. By using spectral graph theory, Chau and Basu obtained a formula to compute the FPT of the random walk on the \(N\)-cycle graph with \(2p\) neighbors. However, We find that in this case, it is easier to use Wu's formula to obtain the effective resistance between any two nodes. This follows from the fact that the eigenvalues of the Laplacian matrix may be obtained without any difficulty in this case. Then it is not difficult to show that this formula when multiplied by the number of edges \(\vert E\vert\) is identical to the (FPT) given in. The undirected circulant graphs enjoy rotational symmetry, i.e., each vertex of these graphs 'looks the same' from any vertex. Therefore, we may as well consider that the random walk has started at vertex \(0\), and after some steps reaches a given vertex say \(l\).   Using the commute time formula given by Chandra et al. , \(C_{ij }=2 \vert E\vert R_{ij}\), then the first passage time \(H_{0l }\) may be written as \(H_{0,l }=\vert E\vert R_{0,l}\). For example, the effective resistance between the vertex \(0\) and any other vertex \(l\) of the complete graph is \(R_{0,l}= 2/N\), and since the number of edges is \(\vert E\vert=\frac{N(N-1)}{2}\), then the expression for the FPT of the random walk on the complete graph gives \(H_{0,l }=N-1\). This result was derived previously using probabilistic techniques on graphs.   It was pointed out by Wu, that little attention has been paid to finite electrical network, even though these are the ones occurring in real life. Therefore, it interesting to apply such a formalism to other finite electrical networks beyond the cycle and the complete graphs. We have already done so for the complete graph \(K_{N}\) in which the number of vertices \(N\) is odd, minus the \(N\) edges that connect the opposite vertices . Here, we give an exact expression for the effective resistance between any two vertices of the \(N\)-cycle graph with four nearest neighbors, i.e., every vertex is connected to its two neighbors and neighbor's neighbors, this graph is denoted by \(C_{N}(1,2)\).   The formalism developed in this paper and in, enables us to obtain closed formulas for the effective resistance of some finite two-dimensional electrical networks, like The circular ladder and the \(2\times N\) electrical network with free boundaries. It turns out that the effective resistance of the graph \(C_{N}(1,2)\) with its first neighbors being removed contributes to the effective resistance of the circular ladder.   In general, the effective resistance of the circulant graphs are given by trigonometrical sums, in particular, when considering the graph \(C_{N}(1,2)\), one has to deal with trigonometrical power sums. This may be evaluated using a formula by Schwatt on trigonometrical power sums, however, this formula does not give the right answer when the powers are congruent to \(N\). Therefore, one has to modify the formula slightly to get the right answer.   Here, the exact computations of the effective resistance and the total effective resistance are explicit, this is done in Section 2. In Section 3, the the FPT, and the MFPT of the simple random walks on the graph \(C_{N}(1,2)\) are also given by closed formulas. Computation of the effective resistance of the graph \(C_{N}(1,2)\) minus \(2N\) vertices of the first neighbors is considered in Section 4. Finally, in section 5, we give our discussion and check our formulas using the Foster first identity and the recursion formula satisfied by the hitting time. # The Exact effective resistance and the total effective resistance of the graph \(C_{N}(1,2)\)   Here, we give the exact formula for the effective resistance of the \(N\)-cycle graph with four nearest neighbors, see Figure. 1. According to Wu's formula, given a resistor network with unit resistors, the effective resistance between any two nodes \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\) is given by \[\label{7} R_{\alpha,\beta}=\sum_{n=1}^{N-1}\frac{|\psi_{n\alpha}-\psi_{n\beta}|^2}{\lambda_n},\] where \(1\leq\alpha,\beta \leq N\) and \(\lambda_n\), \(\psi_{n}\) are the eigenvalues and the eigenvectors of the Laplacian \(L\) of the resistor network having unit resistors (edges), that is, graphs.   The Laplacian matrix \(L\) of the graph \(G=(V,E)\) is \(L=D-A\), here, \(D\) is the diagonal matrix of degrees whose \(i^{\text{ith}}\) element is the number of resistors connected to the \(i^{\text{ith}}\) node. And \(A\) is the adjacency matrix representing the edge set \(E\).   The matrix elements of the Laplacian of the graph \(C_{N}(1,2)\) are; \[\begin{aligned} L_{mn}= \left\{\begin{array}{rl} 4 & \text{if } m=n,\\-1 & \text{if } m=n\pm1, n\pm2 \mod(N),\\ 0 & \text{otherwise}, \end{array} \right. \end{aligned}\] equivalently, we may writes \(L_{mn}=4\delta_{m,n}-(\delta_{m,n+1}+\delta_{m,n-1})-(\delta_{m,n+2}+\delta_{m,n-2})\).   The laplacian matrix \(L\) may be diagonalized using the basis \(\psi_{n,k}:=\frac{1}{\sqrt{N}}\exp(\frac{2\pi ink}{N})\). To that end, we make use of the fact that the matrix elements \(\delta_{m,n+ k}\) may be considered as matrix elements of the \(k^{\text{th}}\) power of the rotation matrix \(R\) of finite closed lattice, i.e, \((R^{k})_{mn}=\delta_{m,n+ k}\). Using the expression of the matrix \(\psi\), then \(\delta_{m,n+ k}\) may be written as \[\begin{aligned} \label{a5} (\mathcal R^{k})_{mn}&=&(\psi^{*}R^{k}\psi)_{mn}=\frac{1}{N}\sum_{j,l} \delta_{j,l+ k} \exp[2\pi i(ln-jm)/N] \nonumber\\&=&\exp[-2\pi ikm/N]\frac{1}{N}\sum_{l}\exp[2\pi il(n-m)/N]\nonumber\\&=& \delta_{m,n}\exp[-2\pi ikm/N], \end{aligned}\] similarly one shows \((R^{-k})_{mn}=\delta_{m,n-k}\) in the diagonalized form reads; \[(\mathcal R^{-k})_{mn}=\delta_{m,n}\exp[2\pi ikm/N].\].   As a consequence, the eigenvalues of the laplacian of the \(N\)-cycle graph with four nearest neighbors, are \(\lambda_n=4\sin^2(n\pi/N)+4\sin^2(2n\pi/N)\). Thus, the effective resistance of the graph \(C_{N}(1,2)\) is \[\begin{aligned} \label{sum1} R(l) &=&\frac{1}{N}\sum_{n=1}^{N-1}\frac{4\sin^2(nl\pi/N)}{4\sin^2(n\pi/N)+4\sin^2(2n\pi/N)}\nonumber \\ &=&\frac{1}{5N}\sum_{n=1}^{N-1}\frac{\sin^2(nl\pi/N)}{\sin^2(n\pi/N)}+\frac{4}{5N}\sum_{n=1}^{N-1}\frac{\sin^2(nl\pi/N)}{5(1-4/5\sin^2(n\pi/N)}, \end{aligned}\] up to a constant factor, the first term in the above expression is nothing but the effective resistance of the \(N\)-cycle graph, \[\begin{aligned} \label{Wu} \frac{1}{N}\sum_{n=1}^{N-1}\frac{\sin^2(nl\pi/N)}{\sin^2(n\pi/N)}=l\big(1-l/N\big), \end{aligned}\] while the second trigonometrical sum is a non-trivial sum that we want to evaluate.   This term may be written explicitly as; \[\begin{aligned} \label{Cont} \sum_{n=1}^{N-1}\frac{\sin^2(nl\pi/N)}{(1-4/5\sin^2(n\pi/N)}=\frac{1}{2}\sum_{j=0}^{\infty}(4/5)^{j}\Big\lbrack\sum_{s=1}^{l}(-1)^{s+1} \frac{l}{l+s} \binom {l+s} {l-s}2^{2s}\sum_{n=1}^{N-1}\sin^{2(s+j)}(n\pi/N)\Big\rbrack, \end{aligned}\] in obtainig Eq. ([\[Cont\]](#Cont){reference-type="ref" reference="Cont"}), we used the identity \(\cos2(ln\pi/N)=\sum_{s=0}^{l}(-1)^s \frac{l}{l+s}\binom {l+s} {l-s}2^{2s}\sin^{2s}(n\pi/N)\). The sum over \(n\) in Eq. ([\[Cont\]](#Cont){reference-type="ref" reference="Cont"}), may be found in Schwatt's classic book, however, it is not suitable for \(j\) a multiple of \(N\), so his formula must be modified. We may show that the right formula that takes into consideration this fact is \[\begin{aligned} \label{trig1} \sum_{n=1}^{N-1}\sin^{2(s+j)}(n\pi/N)= \frac{N}{2^{2(s+j)}}\binom {2(j+s)}{j+s} +\frac{N}{2^{2(j+s)-1}}\sum_{p=1}^{[(j+s)/N]}(-1)^{pN}\binom {2(j+s)} {j-pN}. \end{aligned}\]  Fortunately, we do not need to have a closed form formula for the binomial sum to do our computations. This problem is by-passed through the residue representation of binomials, this will be discussed shortly. Let \(R_{1}(l)\) be the above second term of Eq. ([\[sum1\]](#sum1){reference-type="ref" reference="sum1"}), then our computation is equivalent to evaluate the following terms \[\begin{aligned} \label{trig2} R_{1}(l)^{'}=\frac{1}{25}\sum_{s=1}^{l}(-1)^{s+1} 5^{s} \frac{2l}{l+s}\binom {l+s} {l-s}\Big\lbrack\sum_{J=0}^{\infty}(1/5)^{J}\binom {2J} {J}-\sum_{J=0}^{s-1}(1/5)^{J}\binom {2J} {J}\Big\rbrack, \end{aligned}\] and \[\begin{aligned} \label{trig3} R_{1}(l)^{''}=\frac{4}{25}\sum_{J=0}^{\infty}(1/5)^{J-5}\sum_{s=1}^{l}(-1)^{s+1} \frac{l}{l+s} \binom {l+s} {l-s}\sum_{p=1}^{[J/N]}(-1)^{pN}\binom {2J} {J-pN}, \end{aligned}\] where \(J=j+s\), note that in obtaining the above second sum over \(J\), we added the terms \(J=0,\cdots J=s-1\), since they do not contribute to the binomial \(\binom {2J} {J-pN}\), and \(l\leq{N-1}\).   Now, we will evaluate the sum over \(J\), this is done through the representation of binomial coefficients by residue. First, recall if \(G(w)\) is the generating function of the binomial coefficient sequence \(\binom {n}{k}\) for a fixed \(n\) given by \(G(w)= \sum_{k=0}^{n}\binom {n}{k} w^{k} =(1+w)^{n},\) then \(\binom {n}{k}=\hbox{res}_w (1+w){^n}{w^{-k-1}}\). The following linearity property of the residue operator \(\hbox{res}\) is very crucial in evaluating the effective resistance. This may be defined as follows; given some constants \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\), then \(\alpha \hbox{res}_w G_{1}(w){w^{-k-1}}+ \beta\hbox{res}_w G_{2}(w){w^{-k-1}}=\hbox{res}_w(\alpha G_{1}(w)+ \beta G_{2}(w)) {w^{-k-1}}.\) Using the residue representation of the binomials and the linearity property, then the sum over \(J\) in Eq. ([\[trig2\]](#trig2){reference-type="ref" reference="trig2"}) gives \[\label{trig4} R_{1}(l)^{'}=\frac{1}{25}\sum_{s=1}^{l}(-1)^{s+1} 5^{s} \frac{2l}{l+s}\binom {l+s} {l-s}\Bigg\lbrack \sqrt{5}-5^{1-s}\hbox{res}_w\Bigg(\frac{(1+w)^{2s}}{(w){^s}((1+w)^2-5w)}\bigg)\Bigg\rbrack.\]  The first sum in Eq. ([\[trig4\]](#trig4){reference-type="ref" reference="trig4"}) may be written in terms of the Lucas numbers through the normalized Chebyshev polynomial of the first kind . Let this sum be denoted by \(L_{1}(l)\), then \[\label{trig5} L_{1}(l)=(-1)^{l+1}\frac{\sqrt{5}}{25}\sum_{k=0}^{l-1}(-1)^{k}5^{l-k} \frac{2l}{2l-k}\binom {2l-k} {k}=(-1)^{l+1}\frac{\sqrt{5}}{25}\Bigg\lbrack C_{2l}(\sqrt{5})-(-1)^{l}2\Bigg\rbrack,\] where \[C_{2l}(x)= 2T_{2l}(x/2)=\sum_{k=0}^{l}(-1)^{k} \frac{2l}{2l-k}\binom {2l-k} {k}x^{2l-2k}\] is the normalized Chebyshev polynomial of the first kind and \[T_{2l}(x/2)=\frac{1}{2}\Bigg\lbrack\Bigg(\frac{x}{2}+\sqrt{(x/2)^2-1}\bigg)^{2l} +\Bigg(\frac{x}{2}-\sqrt{(x/2)^2-1}\bigg)^{2l} \Bigg\rbrack.\] Thus, \[L_{1}(l)=(-1)^{l+1}\frac{\sqrt{5}}{25}\bigg(L_{2l}-2(-1)^{l} \bigg) =(-1)^{l+1}\frac{\sqrt{5}} {5} F_{l}^{2},\] where \[L_{2l}=\Bigg(\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2}\bigg)^{2l}+\Bigg(\frac{1-\sqrt{5}}{2}\bigg)^{2l},\] are the bisection of the Lucas numbers, and \[F_{l}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{5}}\Big(\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2}\bigg)^{l}-\frac{1}{\sqrt{5}}\Big(\frac{1-\sqrt{5}}{2}\bigg)^{l},\] are the well-known Fibonacci numbers.   The second sum in Eq. ([\[trig4\]](#trig4){reference-type="ref" reference="trig4"}) denoted by \(F_{1}(l)\), may be computed to give \[\begin{aligned} \label{trig6} F_{1}(l)&=&(-1)^{l}\frac{1}{5}\hbox{res}_{w=0}\frac{1}{(w-(3-\sqrt{5})/2)(w-(3+\sqrt{5})/2))}\bigg({C_{2l}({\frac{1}{\sqrt{w}}+\sqrt{w}})-(-1)^{l}2}\bigg)\nonumber\\ &=&(-1)^{l+1}\frac{1}{5\sqrt{5}}\hbox{res}_{w=0}\frac{1}{w^{l}}\bigg(\frac{1}{((w-(3-\sqrt{5})/2))}-\frac{1}{((w-(3+\sqrt{5})/2))}\bigg)\nonumber\\ &=&(-1)^{l}\frac{1}{5}F_{2l}. \end{aligned}\] Thus, the sum \(R_{1}(l)^{'}\) is given by the following closed form formula \[\label{trig7} R_{1}(l)^{'}=(-1)^{l+1}\frac{\sqrt{5}} {5} F_{l}^{2}+(-1)^{l}\frac{1}{5}F_{2l}\]  For \(N\) even, the sum \(R_{1}(l)^{''}\) given in Eq. ( [\[trig3\]](#trig3){reference-type="ref" reference="trig3"} ) is \[\begin{aligned} \label{trig8} R_{1}(l)^{''}=\frac{4}{25}\sum_{J=0}^{\infty}(1/5)^{J-5}\sum_{s=1}^{l}(-1)^{s+1} \frac{l}{l+s} \binom {l+s} {l-s}\sum_{p=1}^{[J/N]}\binom {2J} {J-pN}, \end{aligned}\] where \[\label{trig12} \sum_{p=1}^{[J/N]}\binom {2J} {J-pN}=\hbox{res}_{w}(1+w)^{2J}w^{-J-1}\Big(\frac{w^{N}}{1-w^{N}} \Big).\] Then the second term \(R_{1}(l)^{''}\), becomes \[\begin{aligned} \label{trig13} R_{1}(l)^{''}=\frac{2}{5}\sum_{s=1}^{l}(-1)^{s+1}5^{s} \frac{2l}{l+s} \binom {l+s} {l-s} \hbox{res}_{w}\Big(\frac{w^{N}}{1-w^{N}}\frac{1}{5w-(1+w)^{2} }\Big), \end{aligned}\] the acceptable residue is \(w=(3-\sqrt{5})/2\), and so the expression for \(R_{1}(l)^{''}\) is \[\begin{aligned} \label{trig14} R_{1}(l)^{''}=\frac{2}{5\sqrt{5}}\sum_{s=1}^{l}(-1)^{s+1}5^{s} \frac{2l}{l+s} \binom {l+s} {l-s}\Bigg(\frac{(\frac{3-\sqrt{5}}{2})^{N}}{1-(\frac{3-\sqrt{5}}{2})^{N}}\Bigg). \end{aligned}\]  The sum over \(s\), was done previously, see Eq. ([\[trig5\]](#trig5){reference-type="ref" reference="trig5"}), therefore, \[\begin{aligned} \label{trig15} R_{1}(l)^{''}=(-1)^{l+1}\frac{2} {\sqrt{5}} F_{l}^{2}\Bigg(\frac{(\frac{3-\sqrt{5}}{2})^{N}}{1-(\frac{3-\sqrt{5}}{2})^{N}}\Bigg). \end{aligned}\]  Finally, the exact formula for the effective resistance between any two vertices of the graph \(C_{N}(1,2)\), reads \[\begin{aligned} \label{trig16} R(l)&=&\frac{1}{5}{l}(1-l/N)+(-1)^{l+1}\frac{\sqrt{5}}{5}F_{l}^{2}+(-1)^{l}\frac{1}{5}F_{2l}\nonumber\\&+& (-1)^{l+1}\frac{2}{\sqrt{5}}F_{l}^{2}\Bigg(\frac{(\frac{3-\sqrt{5}}{2})^{N}}{1-(\frac{3-\sqrt{5}}{2})^{N}}\Bigg)\nonumber\\&=&\frac{1}{5}l(1-l/N)+(-1)^{l+1}\frac{ F_{l}^{2}}{\sqrt{5}}\Bigg(\frac{1+(\frac{3-\sqrt{5}}{2})^{N}}{1-(\frac{3-\sqrt{5}}{2})^{N}}\Bigg)+(-1)^{l}\frac{ F_{2l}}{5}. \end{aligned}\]  Our formula is consistent with the recursion relation, \(R(l+1)=l(1-l/N)+2R(1)-3R(l)-R(l-1)\). The effective resistance \(R(l)\) given by Eq. ([\[sum1\]](#sum1){reference-type="ref" reference="sum1"}) enjoys the following symmetry \(R(l)=R(N-l)\), this is obvious from the first term of our formula given in Eq. ([\[trig16\]](#trig16){reference-type="ref" reference="trig16"}), however, from the second term, this symmetry is not obvious. If our formula were to be correct, then the symmetry enjoyed by the effective resistance \(R(l)\) would give the following identity, \[\begin{aligned} \label{trig18} \frac{1}{5}\Big( F_{2(N-l)}-F_{2l}\Big)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{5}}\Big(F_{(N-l)}^{2}-F_{l}^{2}\Big)\Bigg(\frac{1+(\frac{3-\sqrt{5}}{2})^{N}}{1-(\frac{3-\sqrt{5}}{2})^{N}}\Bigg). \end{aligned}\] This turns out to be correct and follows simply by using the different expressions of the Fibonacci numbers.   The effective resistance considered so far, assumes that the number of vertices is even, the odd case, however, is not so different as far as the above computations are concerned, the only difference between the two cases is that the sum over \(p\) of the binomial given by Eq. ([\[trig12\]](#trig12){reference-type="ref" reference="trig12"}), should be replaced by \[\label{trig19} \sum_{p=1}^{[J/N]}(-1)^{p}\binom {2J} {J-pN}=-\hbox{res}_{w}(1+w)^{2J}w^{-J-1}\Big(\frac{w^{N}}{1+w^{N}} \Big).\] Therefore, the exact effective resistance of the graph \(C_{N}(1,2)\), for \(N\) odd reads \[\label{trig20} R(l)=\frac{1}{5}\frac{l}{N}(N-l)+(-1)^{l+1}\frac{ F_{l}^{2}}{\sqrt{5}}\Bigg(\frac{1-(\frac{3-\sqrt{5}}{2})^{N}}{1+(\frac{3-\sqrt{5}}{2})^{N}}\Bigg)+(-1)^{l}\frac{ F_{2l}}{5}.\] The symmetry of the effective resistance in this case implies the following identity \[\begin{aligned} \label{trig21} \frac{1}{5}\Big( F_{2(N-l)}+ F_{2l}\Big)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{5}}\Big(F_{(N-l)}^{2}+F_{l}^{2}\Big)\Bigg(\frac{1-(\frac{3-\sqrt{5}}{2})^{N}}{1+(\frac{3-\sqrt{5}}{2})^{N}}\Bigg). \end{aligned}\]  Therefore, the computed effective resistance \(R(l)\) is correct and satisfies the hidden symmetry property \(R(l)=R(N-l)\).   Having computed the effective resistance of the graph \(C_{N}(1,2)\), we now compute the total effective resistance of \(C_{N}(1,2)\), this is also known as the Kirchhoff index. The total effective resistance of \(C_{N}(1,2)\) in terms of the effective resistance \(R(l)\), is \[R(C_{N}(1,2))=\sum_{i<j}R_{ij}=\frac{N}{2}\sum_{l=1}^{N-1}R(l).\]   In order to sum over all the effective resistances given by the formula ([\[trig16\]](#trig16){reference-type="ref" reference="trig16"}) for \(N\) even, one needs to evaluate the alternating sums \(\sum_{l=1}^{N-1}(-1)^{l} F_{l}^{2}\) and \(\sum_{l=1}^{N-1}(-1)^{l} F_{2l}\). The first alternating sum may be obtained using the identity due to Lucas \(L_{2l}= F_{2l+2}-F_{2l-2}\), to give \[\sum_{l=1}^{N-1}(-1)^{l} F_{l}^{2}=-\frac{1}{5}\big( F_{2N-1}-1+2N\big).\] Similarly, the second alternating sum may be evaluated from another Lucas formula \(F_{2l}=F_{l+1}^{2}-F_{l-1}^{2}\), to give \[\sum_{l=1}^{N-1}(-1)^{l} F_{2l}= F_{N-1}^{2}-F_{N}^{2}-1.\]  Therefore the exact formula for the total effective resistance reads \[\begin{aligned} \label{trig22} R(C_{N}(1,2))&=&\frac{1}{5}\frac{N^3-N}{12}+\frac{N}{2}\frac{1}{5}\big( F_{2N-1}+2N-1\big)\frac{ 1}{\sqrt{5}}\Bigg(\frac{1+(\frac{3-\sqrt{5}}{2})^{N}}{1-(\frac{3-\sqrt{5}}{2})^{N}}\Bigg)\nonumber\\&+&\frac{N}{2}\frac{1}{5}\big(F_{N-1}^{2}-F_{N}^{2}-1\big). \end{aligned}\]  For \(N\) odd, the total effective resistance is \[\begin{aligned} \label{trig23} R(C_{N}(1,2))&=&\frac{1}{5}\frac{N^3-N}{12}-\frac{N}{2}\frac{1}{5}\big( F_{2N-1}-2N+1\big)\frac{ 1}{\sqrt{5}}\Bigg(\frac{1-(\frac{3-\sqrt{5}}{2})^{N}}{1+(\frac{3-\sqrt{5}}{2})^{N}}\Bigg)\nonumber\\&+&\frac{N}{2}\frac{1}{5}\big(F_{N}^{2}-F_{N-1}^{2}-1\big). \end{aligned}\] # Simple random walk on the graph \(C_{N}(1,2)\)   The connection between simple random walks and electrical networks via the effective resistances in electrical networks is well established. In particular, the covering and commute times of random walks in graphs can be determined by the effective resistance . The simple random walk on a graph \(G\) is defined by the jumping probability \(p_{ij}\) between nearest neighbor vertices \(i\) and \(j\): \[\begin{aligned} p_{ij}=\left\{\begin{array}{cl} \frac{1}{d(i)}& \text{ if \(i\), \(j\) {are adjacent vertices}}, \\ 0& \ \text { otherwise}\ \end{array}\right. \end{aligned}\] here, \(d(i)\) is the degree of the vertex \(i\).   This may be interpreted as the probability the walk move from vertex \(i\) to vertex \(j\), given that we are at vertex \(i\). The simple random walk on a graph \(G\), may be described by the first passage time, or the hitting time FPT, \(H_{ij}\), this is the expected number of jumps that the walk takes until it lands on \(j\), assuming the walk starts at \(i\).   The other related parameter is the the commute time \(C_{ij}\), this is the expected number of jumps in a random walk starting at \(i\) before vertex \(j\) and then vertex \(i\) is reached again, that is, \(C_{ij}=H_{ij}+H_{ji}\). The discussion of hitting times in terms of the effective resistance seems to be due to Chandra et al . In particular, it has been proved by Chandra et al, that the commute time \(C_{ij }\) is equal to \(2 \vert E\vert R_{ij}\).   It has been shown in, that the total effective resistance of a graph \(G\), \(R(G)=\sum_{i<j}R_{ij}\), may be written as \[R(G)=N\sum_{n=1}^{N-1}\frac{1}{\lambda_n},\] where \(\lambda_{n}\) are the eigenvalues of the Laplacian of a graph \(G\). Thus, the total effective resistance is an invariant quantity of a graph \(G\), for symmetric graphs like the circulant graphs with the property \(H_{ij}=H_{ji }\), this quantity reads, \[\label{com1} R(G)=\frac{1}{2\vert E\vert}\sum_{i<j}(H_{ij}+H_{ji})=\frac{1}{\vert E\vert}\sum_{i<j}H_{ij}\] that is, the total effective resistance of the symmetric graph \(G\), is the hitting time averaged over all pairs of vertices.   If the expression for the effective resistance is known in a closed form, then so are the total effective resistance, the FPT and MFPT. Since the graph \(C_{N}(1,2)\) has rotational symmetry, that is, the FPT may be written as \(H_{0,l}=\vert E\vert R(l)\), and with the total number of edges \(\vert E\vert=2N\), then, the exact expression for the FPT of the simple random walk on the \(N\)-cycle graph with \(4\)-nearest neighbors is \[\begin{aligned} \label{first hit} H_{0,l}= \left\{\begin{array}{cl} \frac{2}{5}l(N-l)+(-1)^{l+1}\frac{2N}{\sqrt{5}} F_{l}^{2}\Bigg(\frac{1+(\frac{3-\sqrt{5}}{2})^{N}}{1-(\frac{3-\sqrt{5}}{2})^{N}}\Bigg)+(-1)^{l}\frac{ 2N}{5}F_{2l} & \text{for \(N\) even },\\ \frac{2}{5}l(N-l)+(-1)^{l+1}\frac{2N}{\sqrt{5}} F_{l}^{2}\Bigg(\frac{1-(\frac{3-\sqrt{5}}{2})^{N}}{1+(\frac{3-\sqrt{5}}{2})^{N}}\Bigg)+(-1)^{l}\frac{ 2N}{5}F_{2l} & \text{for \(N \) odd } \end{array} \right. \end{aligned}\]  One may check that our expressions for the effective resistance of the \(N\)-cycle with \(2p\) neighbors, and hence that of the first passage time agree with those in. This may be checked as follows; the eigenvalues of the laplacian of the \(N\)-cycle graph with \(2p\) neighbors are; \(\lambda_n=4\sum_{m1}^{p}\sin^2(nm\pi/N)\). Thus, the two point resistance formula may be written as \[R(l)=\frac{1}{N}\sum_{n=1}^{N-1}\sin^2(nl\pi/N){\Bigl{(}\sum_{m=1}^{p}\sin^2mn\pi/N}\Bigr{)}^{-1}.\] The first passage time \(H_{0,l}\) is \(\vert E\vert R(l)\), where the number of edges for the \(N\)-cycle with \(2p\) neighbors is \(\vert E\vert =pN\), and so \[H_{0,l}= p\sum_{n=1}^{N-1}\sin^2(nl\pi/N){\Bigl{(}\sum_{m=1}^{p}\sin^2mn\pi/N}\Bigr{)}^{-1}.\] This is exactly equivlent to the formula given in.   The MFPT, may be obtained from the following simple formula that holds for all regular graphs, i.e., all vertices that have the same degree \(d\). This formula may be derived as follows; \[\label{mean first hit} \overline{H_{0,l}}=\frac{1}{N}\sum_{l=1}^{N-1} H_{0,l} =\frac{2\vert E\vert}{N^2}\sum_{l=1}^{N-1}\frac{N}{2}R(l)=\frac{d}{N}R(G),\] where we have used the formula \(2\vert E\vert= Nd\) for regular graphs. Since \(d=4\) for \(C_{N}(1,2)\), the closed formula for the MFPT is \[\begin{aligned} \label{mean first hit1} \overline{H_{0,l}} = \left\{\begin{array} {cl} \frac{4}{5}\frac{N^2-1}{12}+\frac{2}{5}\big( F_{2N-1}+2N-1\big)\frac{ 1}{\sqrt{5}}\Bigg(\frac{1+(\frac{3-\sqrt{5}}{2})^{N}}{1-(\frac{3-\sqrt{5}}{2})^{N}}\Bigg) +\frac{2}{5}\big(F_{N-1}^{2}-F_{N}^{2}-1\big)& \text{for \(N\) even }\\ \frac{4}{5}\frac{N^2-1}{12}-\frac{2}{5}\big( F_{2N-1}-2N+1\big)\frac{ 1}{\sqrt{5}}\Bigg(\frac{1-(\frac{3-\sqrt{5}}{2})^{N}}{1+(\frac{3-\sqrt{5}}{2})^{N}}\Bigg)+\frac{2}{5}\big(F_{N}^{2}-F_{N-1}^{2}-1\big)& \text{for \(N \) odd } \end{array} \right. \end{aligned}\]  By using the formula \(R(G)=N\sum_{n=1}^{N-1}\frac{1}{\lambda_n}\), then the equivalent formula for the MFPT is \[\label{mean hit equi} \overline{H_{0,l}}=\sum_{n=1}^{N-1}\frac{1}{\sin^2(n\pi/N)+\sin^2(2n\pi/N)}.\] This is the eigentime identity relating the mean first passage time to the eigenvalues of the Laplacian of the regular graph \(C_{N}(1,2)\) of degree \(4\).   In the literature, the eigentime identity is given in terms of the eigenvalues of the normalized Laplacian \(\mathcal{L}\) , for regular graphs one has, \(\mathcal{L}=D^{-1}L\), i.e, the eigentime identity is independent of the Laplacian used. It is not difficult to show that the formula to compute the MFPT between vertex \(0\) and vertex \(l\), on the \(N\)-cycle graph with \(2p\) neighbors, is \[\overline{H_{0,l}} =p\sum_{n=1}^{N-1}{\Bigl{(}2\sum_{m=1}^{p}\sin^2mn\pi/N}\Bigr{)}^{-1},\] for \(p=1\), gives the well known eigentime identity on the \(N\)-cycle, and for \(p=2\) gives Eq.([\[mean hit equi\]](#mean hit equi){reference-type="ref" reference="mean hit equi"}). # The graph \(C_{N}(1,2)\) minus \(2N\) vertices   Having obtained a closed formula for the effective resistance of the graph \(C_{N}(1,2)\), next we compute the two-point resistance of the graph \(C_{N}(1,2)\) minus \(2N\) vertices, the total number of adjacent vertices in the \(N\)-cycle graph. Let us denote this graph by \(C_{N}^{-2N}(1,2)\), the eigenvalues of this graph are given by \(\lambda_{n}=\sin^22n\pi/N\), then the effective resistance may be written as \[\begin{aligned} \label{aa} R(l)=\frac{1}{N}\sum_{n=1}^{N-1}\frac{\sin^2nl\pi/N}{\sin^22n\pi/N}. \end{aligned}\]  Before computing the effective resistance, we make the following observations, for \(N\) even, the graph \(C_{N}^{-2N}(1,2)\) splits into two \(N/2\)-cycles, see Figure. 2. Therefore, the effective resistance for \(N\) even reeds; \[\begin{aligned} \label{aaaa} R(l)=\frac{2}{N}\sum_{n=1}^{N/2-1}\frac{\sin^22nl\pi/N}{\sin^22n\pi/N}=l(1-2l/N), \end{aligned}\] in obtaining the above equation we used Wu's formula Eq. ([\[Wu\]](#Wu){reference-type="ref" reference="Wu"}).   Now, if \(N\) is odd, then the graph \(C_{N}^{-2N}(1,2)\) is connected, see Figure. 3. Thus, the effective resistance is given by equation ([\[aa\]](#aa){reference-type="ref" reference="aa"}). This is a variant of the Wu's two-point resistance of the cycle graph. Using the trigonometrical identity \[\begin{aligned} \label{aaaaa} \sin^2(l+1)n\pi/N=4\cos^2n\pi/N\sin^2l\pi/N+2\sin^2n\pi/N-2\sin^2nl\pi/N-\sin^2(l-1)n\pi/N, \end{aligned}\] we may show that the effective resistance satisfy the following recursion \[\begin{aligned} \label{rec} R(l+1)=l(1-l/N)+1/2(N-1/N)-2R(l)-R(l-1), \end{aligned}\] where the first term in the above equation is nothing but the effective resistance of the \(N\)-cycle graph. From the above recursion, one may propose the following formula for the effective resistance \[\begin{aligned} \label{con} R(l)=\left\{\begin{array}{cl} \frac{l}{2}\Big(1-\frac{l}{2N}\Big)& \text{for } l\ \text{even},\\ \frac{1}{4}\Big(N-\frac{l^2}{N}\Big)& \text{for } \ l\ \text{odd}. \end{array} \right. \end{aligned}\]  It is not difficult to check that our formula given by equation ([\[con\]](#con){reference-type="ref" reference="con"}) is correct, i.e, satisfy the above recursion formula given by equation ([\[rec\]](#rec){reference-type="ref" reference="rec"}). To do so, one has to take into a account that for \(l\) even, both \(l+1\) and \(l-1\) are odd, similarly for \(l\) odd, both \(l+1\) and \(l-1\) are even. As a result, the effective resistance of the connected graph \(C_{N}^{-2N}(1,2)\) is \[\begin{aligned} \label{conn} R(l)=\frac{1}{N}\sum_{n=1}^{N-1}\frac{\sin^2nl\pi/N}{\sin^22n\pi/N}=\left\{\begin{array}{cl} \frac{l}{2}\Big(1-\frac{l}{2N}\Big)& \text{for } l\ \text{even},\\ \frac{1}{4}\Big(N-\frac{l^2}{N}\Big)& \text{for } \ l\ \text{odd}. \end{array} \right. \end{aligned}\] By using the above formula, one can easily check the symmetry enjoyed by the effective resistance \(R(l)=R(N-l)\). This formula will play a crucial role in obtaining a closed formula for the effective resistance of the circular ladder. # Discussion   To conclude, in this work, we were able to obtain exact formulas for the effective resistance, the total effective resistance, the FPT and the MFPT of the simple random walk on the \(N\)-cycle with \(4\)-nearest neighbors, all these quantities are written in terms of the Fibonacci numbers. The techniques used in this paper are related to those given by the author in , in which we computed the effective resistance of the complete graph minus \(N\) edges, where \(N\) is odd.   The effective resistance was written in terms of certain numbers that we called the Bejaia and the Pisa numbers. These numbers generalize the bisected Fibonacci and Lucas numbers. It was shown recently that the effective resistance of a \(2\times N\) resistor network, is written in terms of the Pisa numbers [^1].   We may check that our formula for the effective resistance is correct using the Foster first identity, namely, \[\sum_{i\sim j}R_{ij}=N-1,\] where the sum is taken over all pairs of adjacent vertices. Due to the symmetry that we have for the graph \(C_{N}(1,2)\), the sum over all effective resistances that connect adjacent vertices may be written as \[\sum_{i\sim j}R_{ij}= NR(1)+NR(2).\] From our expression for the effective resistance given by equation ([\[trig16\]](#trig16){reference-type="ref" reference="trig16"}), and substituting \(F_{1}=F_{2}=1\), then a simple computation gives indeed the Foster identity \(\sum_{i\sim j}R_{ij}=N-1\).   One might as well check that the hitting time satisfies the set of equations given by \[H_{i,j}= 1+\frac{1}{d(i)}\sum_{k\sim i}H_{k,j},\] or equivalently, \[\sum_{k\sim i}\big(H_{i,j}-H_{k,j}\big)=d(i).\] For the \(N\)-cycle with \(4\)-nearest neighbors, set \(i=0\), \(j=1\) then the above equation reduces to \(3H_{0,1}-H_{0,2}-H_{0,3}=4\), that is, the degree for the graph \(C_{N}(1,2)\), in obtaining this result we have used our equation for the hitting time, ([\[first hit\]](#first hit){reference-type="ref" reference="first hit"}) and the fact that \(F_{1}=F_{2}=1, F_{3}=2\).   It is interesting to note that by identifying the total effective resistance \(R( C_{N}(1,2))\) given in the equations ([\[trig22\]](#trig22){reference-type="ref" reference="trig22"}), ([\[trig23\]](#trig23){reference-type="ref" reference="trig23"}) with the invariat quantity \[N\sum_{n=1}^{N-1}\frac{1}{4\sin^2(n\pi/N)+4\sin^2(2n\pi/N)},\] then, we deduce the following identities, \[\begin{aligned} \label{trig26} \sum_{n=1}^{N-1}\frac{1}{\sin^2n\pi/N}=\frac{N^2-1}{3}, \end{aligned}\] \[\begin{aligned} \label{trig27} \sum_{n=1}^{N-1}\frac{1}{(1+4\cos^2n\pi/N)}&=&\frac{1}{2}\big( F_{2N-1}+2N-1\big)\frac{ 1}{\sqrt{5}}\Bigg(\frac{1+(\frac{3-\sqrt{5}}{2})^{N}}{1-(\frac{3-\sqrt{5}}{2})^{N}}\Bigg)\nonumber\\&+&\frac{1}{2}\big(F_{N-1}^{2}-F_{N}^{2}-1\big) \text{for \(N\) even }, \end{aligned}\] \[\begin{aligned} \label{trig28} \sum_{n=1}^{N-1}\frac{1}{(1+4\cos^2n\pi/N)}&=&-\frac{1}{2}\big( F_{2N-1}-2N+1\big)\frac{ 1}{\sqrt{5}}\Bigg(\frac{1-(\frac{3-\sqrt{5}}{2})^{N}}{1+(\frac{3-\sqrt{5}}{2})^{N}}\Bigg)\nonumber\\&+&\frac{1}{2}\big(F_{N}^{2}-F_{N-1}^{2}-1\big) \text{for \(N\) odd }. \end{aligned}\] The first identity is well known, however, we have not seen last two identities in the literature. **Acknowledgment:** I would like to thank the Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics,Trieste, Italy for supports and hospitality during Summer 2012. [^1]: Work in progress

{'timestamp': '2014-01-23T02:07:52', 'yymm': '1401', 'arxiv_id': '1401.5628', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5628'}

# Introduction In response to the changes made in the extra-cellular environment, living systems adapt themselves by coordinated regulation of intracellular machinery composed of several interacting components. In bacterial kingdom, such adaptation is achieved by a group of highly specialized motifs, commonly known as two-component system (TCS). Comprised of membrane bound sensor kinase and cytoplasmic response regulator, TCS detects changes made in the environment and, in response, controls expression and/or repression of one or several downstream genes (target genes other than operon). In presence of an external stimulus, autophosphorylation takes place in the conserved histidine residue of the sensor kinase. The phosphate group is then transferred to its cognate partner, the response regulator, containing conserved aspartate domain. When phosphorylated, the response regulator regulates one or several downstream genes, as well as its own operon. For example, in *M. tuberculosis*, the response regulator MprA gets phosphorylated by its cognate sensor MprB in presence of the signal and exerts a positive feedback on its own operon *mprAB*. In addition to being the source of phosphate group, sensor kinase sometimes can dephosphorylate phosphate group from a response regulator by acting as phosphatase. This combined kinase and phosphatase activity of the sensor kinase makes the TCS bifunctional. Due to the opposing (kinase and phosphatase) effect of sensor kinase on response regulator, bifunctional systems have been placed in a broad category of functional motifs known as *paradoxical components*. In certain TCS, role of sensor as a phosphatase is absent, and the job of dephosphorylation is done by an auxiliary protein (phosphatase), thus making the TCS monofunctional . Depending on the nature of extra-cellular stimulus, a single bacterium may utilize different types of TCS with highly specific functionality to transduce the changes made in the surroundings. To sense and adapt appropriately, a single bacterium may contain both monofunctional and bifunctional TCS. For example, *E. coli* chemotaxis system has CheA/CheY TCS that responds to change in the chemical gradient in the surrounding where the sensor kinase CheA is monofunctional in nature (acts as kinase only) and role of phosphatase is played by CheZ which is not a part of the TCS. On the other hand, EnvZ/OmpR TCS in *E. coli* responds to change in the osmolarity of the environment where sensor kinase EnvZ plays a bifunctional role (acts as kinase as well as phosphatase). One of the advantages of a bifunctional system over a monofunctional one is that it takes care of *input-output robustness* . Due to its architecture, the output level of the phosphorylated response regulator in a bifunctional system depends only on the input stimulus and is independent of other system components. On the other hand, such a robustness criterion does not remain valid in a monofunctional system. Thus, in the latter case, in addition to the input stimulus, the output level depends also on the level of phosphatase which acts on the phosphorylated response regulator. When the aforesaid signal transduction processes are considered within the single cell scenario, role of fluctuations, cellular and/or extra-cellular, cannot be ruled out. Whether external or internal, such fluctuations not only affect the gene expression mechanism within a cell but also control the signal transduction processes involving post-translational modifications that are taking place within a noisy environment. With the advancement of experimental techniques that employ single cell measurement, it is now possible to quantify different physically realizable quantities like variance, Fano factor (variance/mean), etc., of different cellular components. In this light, it is thus worthwhile to develop a stochastic formalism to study signal transduction processes in bacterial TCS keeping in mind the difference in functionality of the sensor kinase. Although deterministic modeling of bacterial signal transduction machinery is known in the literature, few attempts have been made to study the same using a stochastic framework. In this connection, it is important to mention the theoretical modeling of bacterial two component system where stochastic kinetics has been used to study different phenotypic response (graded and all-or-none). In the present work, however, we have developed a mathematical formalism to study signal transduction processes in generic bacterial TCS. While developing the model, we have taken into account only the post-translational modification in terms of phosphorylation-dephosphorylation kinetics as the timescale of the phosphotransfer kinetics is faster than the synthesis and/or degradation timescale of the system components. As mentioned earlier, the main role of TCS is to transmit the information of changes in the extra-cellular environment reliably within the cell. In the proposed stochastic study, we compare information processing in TCS with the monofunctional and the bifunctional property of sensor kinase. Combining both theoretical and numerical approaches, we show that for a fixed level of fluctuations due to stimulus, bifunctional TCS carries out a more reliable signal processing compared to monofunctional TCS. The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In the next section, we develop the mathematical model to study signal transduction mechanism in monofunctional and in bifunctional system. Results of the model are discussed in Sec. III and the paper is concluded in Sec. IV. # The model Following phosphotransfer kinetics depicted in Fig. ([\[fig1\]](#fig1){reference-type="ref" reference="fig1"}) for both monofunctional and bifunctional systems, we have developed a mathematical model for noisy signal transduction in the present communication. In presence of an external inducer \(I\), sensor kinase \(S\) gets phosphorylated at the conserved histidine residue to form \(S_p\). Phosphorylated sensor then transfers the phosphate group to its cognate response regulator \(R\), forming \(R_p\). It is important to note that the above mentioned kinetics is common for both monofunctional and bifunctional systems. When it comes to removal of the phosphate group (dephosphorylation) from the response regulator, the two systems (monofunctional and bifunctional) behave differently. In the monofunctional system, the phosphate group from \(R_p\) is removed by a phosphatase \(P_h\) whereas, in the bifunctional one, the phosphate group is removed by the unphosphorylated sensor \(S\) itself. Thus, in monofunctional system, the sensor acts as a source of phosphate group and, in bifunctional system, the same acts as a sink in addition to being a source of the phosphate group. Considering the aforesaid interactions, the minimal kinetic steps for the phosphotransfer motif can be written as In the above kinetic steps, Eq. ([\[eq1a\]](#eq1a){reference-type="ref" reference="eq1a"}) refers to the synthesis and degradation of the external inducer \(I\). Eq. ([\[eq1b\]](#eq1b){reference-type="ref" reference="eq1b"}) takes care of autophosphorylation and dephosphorylation of the sensor kinase. While modeling the autophosphorylation reaction, we have considered the signal \(I\) as a catalyst which helps to convert the sensor \(S\) to its phosphorylated form (\(S_p\)). However, theoretical formalism developed earlier considered a more general framework for stochastic signaling through enzymatic futile cycles. Eq. ([\[eq1c\]](#eq1c){reference-type="ref" reference="eq1c"}) considers the kinase reaction and Eq. ([\[eq1d\]](#eq1d){reference-type="ref" reference="eq1d"}) considers the phosphatase activity of \(P_h\) towards \(R_p\). It is important to mention that while writing the kinase and the phosphatase kinetics, we have considered second order bi-molecular reaction scheme, although these reaction kinetics are generally written using Michaelis-Menten type kinetics in the existing literature. One of the advantages of using Michaelis-Menten kinetics is that it generates ultrasensitive switch in a system provided the network architecture generates substantial nonlinearity. However, the reason behind using the second order bi-molecular reaction scheme in the present work is that it makes our analytical calculation tractable as shown in Sec. IIA and Sec. IIB. Since the auxiliary protein \(P_h\) behaves as an alternative source of phosphatase in the monofunctional system, it is worthwhile to consider its kinetics (synthesis and degradation) in the model. To this end, production and degradation of the phosphatase \(P_h\) has been taken care of by Eq. ([\[eq1e\]](#eq1e){reference-type="ref" reference="eq1e"}). Finally, Eq. ([\[eq1f\]](#eq1f){reference-type="ref" reference="eq1f"}) is due to the phosphatase activity of \(S\) towards \(R_p\). Note that Eqs. ([\[eq1a\]](#eq1a){reference-type="ref" reference="eq1a"}-[\[eq1c\]](#eq1c){reference-type="ref" reference="eq1c"}) are common for both monofunctional and bifunctional systems. Eqs. ([\[eq1d\]](#eq1d){reference-type="ref" reference="eq1d"}-[\[eq1e\]](#eq1e){reference-type="ref" reference="eq1e"}) are exclusive for the monofunctional system and Eq. ([\[eq1f\]](#eq1f){reference-type="ref" reference="eq1f"}) is solely for the bifunctional system. While writing the kinetic steps, we have mostly considered the post-translational modification for sensor and response regulator. As mentioned earlier, we do not consider synthesis and degradation of the system components (\(S\) and \(R\)) in the proposed model which keeps the total amount of sensor and response regulator constant, i.e., \(S+S_p=S_T\) and \(R+R_p=R_T\). To understand the role of fluctuations prevalent due to the external inducer \(I\) and the intrinsic cellular noise affecting the phosphotransfer mechanism, we adopt Langevin approach to define different physical quantities. Langevin approach within the purview of linear noise approximation is a valid approach provided fluctuations in the input signal are very small so that one can linearize the resultant noise in the Langevin equation. Such linearization also remains valid when the coarse grained (steady state) time scale is longer than the birth-death rate of system components. In addition, a large copy number of system components makes the approximation valid. Since in TCS, copy numbers of \(S\) and \(R\) are large, one can adopt Langevin formalism to understand the stochastic signal transduction mechanism. Thus, the Langevin equation associated with the inducer kinetics is given by, \[\label{eq2} \frac{dI}{dt} = k_{sI}-k_{dI} I +\] where \[\label{eq3} \langle \langle\] with \(\langle I \rangle\) being the mean inducer level at steady state. It is important to note that Eqs. ([\[eq2\]](#eq2){reference-type="ref" reference="eq2"}-[\[eq3\]](#eq3){reference-type="ref" reference="eq3"}) are common for both monofunctional and bifunctional systems. ## Monofunctional system Considering the kinetic steps given by Eqs. ([\[eq1b\]](#eq1b){reference-type="ref" reference="eq1b"}-[\[eq1e\]](#eq1e){reference-type="ref" reference="eq1e"}) and fluctuations associated with them, the Langevin equations for \(S_p\), \(R_p\) and \(P_h\) for the monofunctional system can be written as The additive noise terms \(and\) respectively. Using the concept of linear noise approximation, the statistical properties of three fluctuating terms can be written as Linearizing Eq. ([\[eq2\]](#eq2){reference-type="ref" reference="eq2"}) and Eqs. ([\[eq4a\]](#eq4a){reference-type="ref" reference="eq4a"}-[\[eq4c\]](#eq4c){reference-type="ref" reference="eq4c"}) around the mean value at steady state, i.e., \(I = \langle I \rangle + \delta I\), \(S_p = \langle S_p \rangle_m + \delta S_p\), \(R_p = \langle R_p \rangle_m + \delta R_p\) and \(P_h = \langle P_h \rangle + \delta P_h\), we have \[\begin{aligned} \label{eq6} \frac{d}{dt} \left ( \begin{array}{c} \delta I \\ \delta S_p \\ \delta R_p \\ \delta P_h \end{array} \right ) & = & \left ( \begin{array}{cccc}-J_{I I} & J_{I S_p} & J_{I R_p} & J_{I P_h} \\ J_{S_p I} &-J_{S_p S_p} & J_{S_p R_p} & J_{S_p P_h} \\ J_{R_p I} & J_{R_p S_p} &-J_{R_p R_p} &-J_{R_p P_h} \\ J_{P_h I} & J_{P_h S_p} & J_{P_h R_p} &-J_{P_h P_h} \end{array} \right ) \nonumber \\ && \times \left ( \begin{array}{c} \delta I \\ \delta S_p \\ \delta R_p \\ \delta P_h \end{array} \right ) + \left ( \begin{array}{c} \end{array} \right ), \end{aligned}\] with \[\begin{aligned} && J_{II} = k_{dI}, J_{I S_p} = J_{I R_p} = J_{I P_h} = 0, \\ && J_{Sp I} = k_p [ S_T-\langle S_p \rangle_m ], \\ && J_{S_p S_p} = k_p \langle I \rangle + k_{dp} + k_k [ R_T-\langle R_p \rangle_m ], \\ && J_{S_p R_p} = k_k \langle S_p \rangle_m, J_{S_p P_h} = J_{R_p I} = 0, \\ && J_{R_p S_p} = k_k [ R_T-\langle R_p \rangle_m ], \\ && J_{R_p R_p} = k_k \langle S_p \rangle_m + k_{pm} \langle P_h \rangle, J_{R_p P_h} = k_{pm} \langle R_p \rangle_m, \\ && J_{P_h I} = J_{P_h S_p} = J_{P_h R_p} = 0. \end{aligned}\] Fourier transformation (\(\delta \tilde{X} (\omega) = \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\delta X (t)\exp (-i\omega t)\) \(dt\)) of Eq. ([\[eq6\]](#eq6){reference-type="ref" reference="eq6"}) gives \[\begin{aligned} \label{eq6n} \left ( \begin{array}{c} i \omega \delta \tilde{I} \\ i \omega \delta \tilde{S}_p \\ i \omega \delta \tilde{R}_p \\ i \omega \delta \tilde{P}_h \end{array} \right ) & = & \left ( \begin{array}{cccc}-J_{I I} & J_{I S_p} & J_{I R_p} & J_{I P_h} \\ J_{S_p I} &-J_{S_p S_p} & J_{S_p R_p} & J_{S_p P_h} \\ J_{R_p I} & J_{R_p S_p} &-J_{R_p R_p} &-J_{R_p P_h} \\ J_{P_h I} & J_{P_h S_p} & J_{P_h R_p} &-J_{P_h P_h} \end{array} \right ) \nonumber \\ && \times \left ( \begin{array}{c} \delta \tilde{I} \\ \delta \tilde{S}_p \\ \delta \tilde{R}_p \\ \delta \tilde{P}_h \end{array} \right ) + \left ( \begin{array}{c} \tilde{ \tilde{ \tilde{ \tilde{ \end{array} \right ). \end{aligned}\] Solving Eq. ([\[eq6n\]](#eq6n){reference-type="ref" reference="eq6n"}) yields \[\begin{aligned} (i\omega + J_{S_p S_p}) \delta \tilde{S}_p & = & J_{S_p I} \delta \tilde{I} + J_{S_p R_p} \delta \tilde{R}_p + \tilde{ (i\omega + J_{R_p R_p}) \delta \tilde{R}_p & = & J_{R_p S_p} \delta \tilde{S}_p-J_{R_p P_h} \delta \tilde{P}_h + \tilde{ (i\omega + J_{I I}) \delta \tilde{I} & = & \tilde{ (i\omega + J_{P_h P_h}) \delta \tilde{P}_h = \tilde{ \end{aligned}\] which finally leads to the desired expression of \(\delta \tilde{R}_p\) for the monofunctional system, \[\begin{aligned} \label{eq7} \delta \tilde{R}_p & = & \frac{ J_{R_p S_p} J_{S_p I} \delta \tilde{I} }{ (i\omega+J_{R_p R_p}) (i\omega+J_{S_p S_p})-J_{R_p S_p} J_{S_p R_p} } \nonumber \\ &&-\frac{ [ (i\omega+J_{S_p S_p}) J_{R_p P_h} ] \delta \tilde{P}_h }{ (i\omega+J_{R_p R_p}) (i\omega+J_{S_p S_p})-J_{R_p S_p} J_{S_p R_p} } \nonumber \\ && + \frac{ ( i\omega+J_{S_p S_p} ) \tilde{ }{ (i\omega+J_{R_p R_p}) (i\omega+J_{S_p S_p})-J_{R_p S_p} J_{S_p R_p} } \nonumber \\ && + \frac{ J_{R_p S_p} \tilde{ }{ (i\omega+J_{R_p R_p}) (i\omega+J_{S_p S_p})-J_{R_p S_p} J_{S_p R_p} }, \end{aligned}\] where \[\label{eq8} \delta \tilde{I} = \frac{\tilde{ \delta \tilde{P}_h = \frac{\tilde{\] In Eq. ([\[eq7\]](#eq7){reference-type="ref" reference="eq7"}), the first term arises due to external inducer I. The second term is due to fluctuations in the phosphatase activity of \(P_h\) on \(R_p\). The third and fourth terms arise due to fluctuations in \(R_p\) and \(S_p\), respectively. Now, using the expression of \(\delta \tilde{R}_p\) given in Eq. ([\[eq7\]](#eq7){reference-type="ref" reference="eq7"}) and employing the properties of linear noise approximation given in Eqs. ([\[eq5a\]](#eq5a){reference-type="ref" reference="eq5a"}-[\[eq5d\]](#eq5d){reference-type="ref" reference="eq5d"}), we define the variance associated with \(R_p\) for the monofunctional system, \[\begin{aligned} \label{varm} \sigma^2_{R_p} &=& \frac{1}{2\pi} \int d\omega \left \langle \left | \delta \tilde{R}_p (\omega) \right |^2 \right \rangle_m, \nonumber \\ &=&\frac{ J^2_{R_p S_p} J^2_{S_p I} \langle I \rangle (\alpha_m+\beta_m+J_{II}) }{ \alpha_m \beta_m (\alpha_m+\beta_m) (\alpha_m+J_{II}) (\beta_m+J_{II}) } \nonumber \\ && + \frac{ J^2_{R_p P_h} \langle P_h \rangle }{ \alpha_m \beta_m } \nonumber \\ && \times \frac{ (\beta_m+J_{P_hP_h})J^2_{S_pS_p} + \alpha_m (\beta_m J_{P_hP_h}+J^2_{S_pS_p} ) }{ (\alpha_m+\beta_m) (\alpha_m+J_{P_hP_h}) (\beta_m+J_{P_hP_h}) } \nonumber \\ && + \frac{ \gamma_m + k_k \langle S_p \rangle_m [R_T-\langle R_p \rangle_m] (J^2_{S_pS_p}+\alpha_m \beta_m) }{ \alpha_m \beta_m (\alpha_m+\beta_m) }, \end{aligned}\] with \[\begin{aligned} \alpha_m &=& \frac{1}{2} \left [ (J_{S_pS_p}+J_{R_pR_p}) \right. \\ && \left. + \left \{ (J_{S_pS_p}-J_{R_pR_p})^2 + 4 J_{S_pR_p} J_{R_pS_p} \right \}^{1/2} \right ], \\ \beta_m &=& \frac{1}{2} \left [ (J_{S_pS_p}+J_{R_pR_p}) \right. \\ && \left.-\left \{ (J_{S_pS_p}-J_{R_pR_p})^2 + 4 J_{S_pR_p} J_{R_pS_p} \right \}^{1/2} \right ], \\ \gamma_m &=& J^2_{R_pS_p} k_p (S_T-\langle S_p \rangle_m) \langle I \rangle \\ &&-J_{R_pS_p} J_{S_pS_p} k_k \langle S_p \rangle_m (R_T-\langle R_p \rangle_m). \end{aligned}\] ## Bifunctional system Considering the kinetic steps given by Eqs. ([\[eq1b\]](#eq1b){reference-type="ref" reference="eq1b"}-[\[eq1c\]](#eq1c){reference-type="ref" reference="eq1c"},[\[eq1f\]](#eq1f){reference-type="ref" reference="eq1f"}) and fluctuations associated with them, the Langevin equations for \(S_p\) and \(R_p\) for the bifunctional system can be written as The additive noise terms \(in the copy number of\)S_p\(and\)R_p\(, respectively. The statistical properties of the two fluctuating terms are given by \begin{subequations} \begin{eqnarray} \label{eq10a} \langle \langle I \rangle \delta (\tau), \\ \label{eq10b} \langle [ R_T-\langle R_p \rangle_ b ] \nonumber \\ && \times \delta (\tau), \end{eqnarray} \noindent with\)In the above equations, \(\langle S_p \rangle_b\) and \(\langle R_p \rangle_b\) stand for the mean values of \(S_p\) and \(R_p\) at the steady state, respectively. Here, \(\langle \cdots \rangle_b\) has been used to designate ensemble average for a bifunctional system. As in monofunctional system, we consider the noise terms \(\begin{equation} \label{eq10c} \langle [ R_T-\langle R_p \rangle_b ] \delta (\tau). \end{equation} \end{subequations} \noindent At this point it is important to note the difference between Eq.~(\ref{eq4b}) and Eq.~(\ref{eq9b}). In Eq.~(\ref{eq4b}), the loss term (\)k\_pm P_h R_p\() appears due to phosphatase activity of\)P_h\(on\)R_p\(, whereas in Eq.~(\ref{eq9b}), the loss term (\)k\_pb R_p (S_T-S_p)\() appears due to phosphatase activity of\)S\(on\)R_p\(. Although the noise term\) in both Eqs. ([\[eq4b\]](#eq4b){reference-type="ref" reference="eq4b"},[\[eq9b\]](#eq9b){reference-type="ref" reference="eq9b"}) looks almost the same, it is the loss term in the aforesaid equations that makes the steady state behavior of \(R_p\) different in monofunctional and bifunctional systems. Now, linearizing as usual around the mean value at steady state we have \[\begin{aligned} \label{eq11} \frac{d}{dt} \left ( \begin{array}{c} \delta I \\ \delta S_p \\ \delta R_p \end{array} \right ) & = & \left ( \begin{array}{ccc}-J_{I I} & J_{I S_p} & J_{I R_p} \\ J_{S_p I} &-J_{S_p S_p} & J_{S_p R_p} \\ J_{R_p I} & J_{R_p S_p} &-J_{R_p R_p} \\ \end{array} \right ) \nonumber \\ && \times \left ( \begin{array}{c} \delta I \\ \delta S_p \\ \delta R_p \end{array} \right ) + \left ( \begin{array}{c} \end{array} \right ), \end{aligned}\] with \[\begin{aligned} && J_{II} = k_{dI}, J_{I S_p} = J_{I R_p} = 0, J_{Sp I} = k_p [ S_T-\langle S_p \rangle_b ], \\ && J_{S_p S_p} = k_p \langle I \rangle + k_{dp} + k_k [ R_T-\langle R_p \rangle_b ], J_{S_p R_p} = k_k \langle S_p \rangle_b, \\ && J_{R_p I} = 0, J_{R_p S_p} = k_k [ R_T-\langle R_p \rangle_b ] + k_{pb} \langle R_p \rangle_b, \\ && J_{R_p R_p} = k_k \langle S_p \rangle_b + k_{pb} [ S_T-\langle S_P \rangle_b ]. \end{aligned}\] Fourier transforming Eq. ([\[eq11\]](#eq11){reference-type="ref" reference="eq11"}) yields \[\begin{aligned} \label{eq11n} \left ( \begin{array}{c} i\omega \delta \tilde{I} \\ i\omega \delta \tilde{S}_p \\ i\omega \delta \tilde{R}_p \end{array} \right ) & = & \left ( \begin{array}{ccc}-J_{I I} & J_{I S_p} & J_{I R_p} \\ J_{S_p I} &-J_{S_p S_p} & J_{S_p R_p} \\ J_{R_p I} & J_{R_p S_p} &-J_{R_p R_p} \\ \end{array} \right ) \nonumber \\ && \times \left ( \begin{array}{c} \delta \tilde{I} \\ \delta \tilde{S}_p \\ \delta \tilde{R}_p \end{array} \right ) + \left ( \begin{array}{c} \tilde{ \tilde{ \tilde{ \end{array} \right ), \end{aligned}\] solution of which eventually leads to \[\begin{aligned} (i\omega+J_{S_pS_p}) \delta \tilde{S}_p &=& J_{S_pI} \delta \tilde{I} + J_{S_pR_p} \delta \tilde{R}_p +\tilde{ (i\omega + J_{R_p R_p}) \delta \tilde{R}_p & = & J_{R_p S_p} \delta \tilde{S}_p + \tilde{ \end{aligned}\] Using the above two relations, we have the desired expression of \(\delta \tilde{R}_p\) for the bifunctional system \[\begin{aligned} \label{eq12} \delta \tilde{R}_p & = & \frac{ J_{R_p S_p} J_{S_p I} \delta \tilde{I} }{ (i\omega+J_{R_p R_p}) (i\omega+J_{S_p S_p})-J_{R_p S_p} J_{S_p R_p} } \nonumber \\ && + \frac{ ( i\omega+J_{S_p S_p} ) \tilde{ }{ (i\omega+J_{R_p R_p}) (i\omega+J_{S_p S_p})-J_{R_p S_p} J_{S_p R_p} } \nonumber \\ && + \frac{ J_{R_p S_p} \tilde{ }{ (i\omega+J_{R_p R_p}) (i\omega+J_{S_p S_p})-J_{R_p S_p} J_{S_p R_p} }, \end{aligned}\] where the expression for \(\delta \tilde{I}\) is given in Eq. ([\[eq8\]](#eq8){reference-type="ref" reference="eq8"}). Now, using the expression for \(\delta \tilde{R}_p\) and properties of linear noise expression given in Eqs. ([\[eq10a\]](#eq10a){reference-type="ref" reference="eq10a"}-[\[eq10c\]](#eq10c){reference-type="ref" reference="eq10c"}), we write the variance associated with \(R_p\) for the bifunctional system \[\begin{aligned} \label{varb} \sigma^2_{R_p} &=& \frac{1}{2\pi} \int d\omega \left \langle \left | \delta \tilde{R}_p (\omega) \right |^2 \right \rangle_b, \nonumber \\ &=&\frac{ J^2_{R_p S_p} J^2_{S_p I} \langle I \rangle (\alpha_b+\beta_b+J_{II}) }{ \alpha_b \beta_b (\alpha_b+\beta_b) (\alpha_b+J_{II}) (\beta_b+J_{II}) } \nonumber \\ && + \frac{ \gamma_b + k_k \langle S_p \rangle_b [R_T-\langle R_p \rangle_b] (J^2_{S_pS_p}+\alpha_b \beta_b) }{ \alpha_b \beta_b (\alpha_b+\beta_b) }, \end{aligned}\] with \[\begin{aligned} \alpha_b &=& \frac{1}{2} \left [ (J_{S_pS_p}+J_{R_pR_p}) \right. \\ && \left. + \left \{ (J_{S_pS_p}-J_{R_pR_p})^2 + 4 J_{S_pR_p} J_{R_pS_p} \right \}^{1/2} \right ], \\ \beta_b &=& \frac{1}{2} \left [ (J_{S_pS_p}+J_{R_pR_p}) \right. \\ && \left.-\left \{ (J_{S_pS_p}-J_{R_pR_p})^2 + 4 J_{S_pR_p} J_{R_pS_p} \right \}^{1/2} \right ], \\ \gamma_b &=& J^2_{R_pS_p} k_p (S_T-\langle S_p \rangle_b) \langle I \rangle \\ &&-J_{R_pS_p} J_{S_pS_p} k_k \langle S_p \rangle_b (R_T-\langle R_p \rangle_b). \end{aligned}\] # Results and discussion Since the main objective of the TCS signal transduction motif is to transduce the external stimulus effectively and to generate the pool of phosphorylated response regulator \(R_p\) that regulates several downstream genes, we now focus on quantifying different physical quantities associated with \(R_p\) for monofunctional and bifunctional systems. While doing this, we make use of the expressions for \(R_p\) given by Eq. ([\[varm\]](#varm){reference-type="ref" reference="varm"}) and Eq. ([\[varb\]](#varb){reference-type="ref" reference="varb"}). Before proceeding further, it is important to mention the activity of kinase and phosphatase in monofunctional and bifunctional systems. In the monofunctional system, it has been observed that phosphatase has a higher affinity for the phosphorylated response regulator. On the other hand, in the bifunctional system, unphosphorylated sensor kinase has a lower affinity for the same. Following these experimental information, kinase and phosphatase rate constants for both systems could be \(k_k/k_{pm} < k_k/k_{pb}\). However, following earlier work on deterministic system, we consider \(k_k/k_{pm} = k_k/k_{pb}\) as the particular parameter set as it has been shown to have a high degree of robustness. Furthermore, to check the validity of our proposed model, we perform stochastic simulation using Gillespie algorithm and find that the theoretical and numerical results are in good agreement with each other. In Fig. [\[fig2\]](#fig2){reference-type="ref" reference="fig2"}(a), we show the mean \(R_p\) level at steady state, \(\langle R_p \rangle\), as a function of mean extra-cellular inducer level, \(\langle I \rangle\). Initially, for low inducer level, both profiles grow linearly. However, as inducer level increases, the profile of \(\langle R_p \rangle\) for the monofunctional system (solid line) grows hyperbolically, whereas the same for the bifunctional system grows linearly (dashed line). It is important to mention that linear growth is a signature of linear input-output relation where the output level is dependent only on the input stimulus which increases the autophosphorylation rate in the model. Linear input-output relation for the bifunctional system can be derived easily from Eq. (11), which provides the expression for mean \(R_p\) level at steady state \[\begin{aligned} \langle R_p \rangle & = & \frac{1}{2} \left ( R_T + \frac{k_{dp}}{k_k} + \frac{k_p \langle I \rangle}{k_{pb}} \right ) \nonumber \\ &&-\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{ \left ( R_T + \frac{k_{dp}}{k_k} + \frac{k_p \langle I \rangle}{k_{pb}} \right )^2-\frac{4 k_p \langle I \rangle R_T}{k_{pb}} }. \end{aligned}\] For \(R_T > (k_{dp}/k_k) + (k_p \langle I \rangle/k_{pb})\), we have \(\langle R_p \rangle \approx (k_p/k_{pb}) \langle I \rangle\), showing a linear relation between the input signal and the output. On the other hand, using Eq. (4), one can derive mean \(R_p\) level at steady state for monofunctional system which takes into account both signals (input stimulus and phosphatase) as well as steady state value of mean \(S_p\) \[\begin{aligned} \langle R_p \rangle = \frac{ k_p \langle I \rangle S_T-( k_p \langle I \rangle + k_{dp}) \langle S_p \rangle }{ k_{pm} \langle P_h \rangle }. \end{aligned}\] In this connection, it is important to mention that TetR-based negative autoregulation has been reported to linearize the dose-response (input-output) relation in *S. cerevisiae*. Fig. [\[fig2\]](#fig2){reference-type="ref" reference="fig2"}(a) further shows that for a fixed stimulus, amount of \(R_p\) is always higher for the bifunctional TCS. Thus, for a fixed stimulus, phosphotransfer mechanism is more effective in producing a pool of \(R_p\) for the bifunctional system compared to the monofunctional one and is in agreement with the result proposed earlier . Biologically, generation of a larger pool of \(R_p\) is quite significant when it comes to the phenomenon of gene regulation, as \(R_p\) acts as a transcription factor for several downstream genes. In the mechanism of gene regulation, a specific transcription factor needs to attain a threshold value to make the genetic switch operative. Our result suggests that for a target gene, a bifunctional system might work more effectively than a monofunctional one by attaining the required pool of \(R_p\) earlier. Due to such a high activity, the bifunctional system will respond to a certain stimulus earlier than the monofunctional system by regulating downstream genes. Fig. [\[fig2\]](#fig2){reference-type="ref" reference="fig2"}(b) shows the profile of \(\sigma^2_{R_p}\), variance of \(R_p\). For the monofunctional system, the variance grows steadily and then remains almost constant (solid line). However, the variance profile of the bifunctional system first grows to a maximum and then starts going down (dashed line). At a critical value of extra-cellular inducer level, almost all sensors and response regulators in the bifunctional system become phosphorylated, which, in turn, decrease fluctuations associated with \(R_p\). Lowering of fluctuations in \(R_p\) thereby reduces the variance. For the monofunctional case, in addition to the phosphorylation by the sensor kinase, an additional strong phosphatase activity is operational in the system which maintains sufficient fluctuations in the \(R_p\) level, henceforth keeping the variance constant. In the calculation of variance for the monofunctional system (see Eq. ([\[varm\]](#varm){reference-type="ref" reference="varm"})), we have considered two extra sources of fluctuations, one due to the fluctuations in the kinetics of extra-cellular signal (Eq. ([\[eq1a\]](#eq1a){reference-type="ref" reference="eq1a"})) and the other due to the fluctuations in the kinetics of phosphatase \(P_h\) (Eq. ([\[eq1e\]](#eq1e){reference-type="ref" reference="eq1e"})). It is thus interesting to analyze whether fluctuations due to \(P_h\) do have any significant role in the variance of the monofunctional system. In the expression of \(\delta \tilde{R}_p\) for the monofunctional system (see Eq. ([\[eq7\]](#eq7){reference-type="ref" reference="eq7"})), the second term appears due to the stochastic kinetics associated with the phosphatase \(P_h\) (see Eq. ([\[eq4c\]](#eq4c){reference-type="ref" reference="eq4c"})). However, for a constant level of phosphatase, i.e., \(\langle P_h \rangle\) one does not need to consider the stochastic kinetics given by Eq. ([\[eq4c\]](#eq4c){reference-type="ref" reference="eq4c"}) that effectively removes fluctuations associated with \(P_h\) from both Eq. ([\[eq7\]](#eq7){reference-type="ref" reference="eq7"}) and Eq. ([\[varm\]](#varm){reference-type="ref" reference="varm"}). In addition, the mean field contribution of \(P_h\) appears in the second term on the right hand side of Eq. ([\[eq4b\]](#eq4b){reference-type="ref" reference="eq4b"}). Thus, for \(\langle P_h \rangle\), the expression of variance for the monofunctional system becomes \[\begin{aligned} \label{varmc} \sigma^2_{R_p} &=& \frac{ J^2_{R_p S_p} J^2_{S_p I} \langle I \rangle (\alpha_m+\beta_m+J_{II}) }{ \alpha_m \beta_m (\alpha_m+\beta_m) (\alpha_m+J_{II}) (\beta_m+J_{II}) } \nonumber \\ && + \frac{ \gamma_m + k_k \langle S_p \rangle_m [R_T-\langle R_p \rangle_m] (J^2_{S_pS_p}+\alpha_m \beta_m) }{ \alpha_m \beta_m (\alpha_m+\beta_m) }. \end{aligned}\] In Fig. [\[fig3\]](#fig3){reference-type="ref" reference="fig3"}, we show variance associated with \(R_p\) for the monofunctional system. The solid and dotted lines are due to presence and absence of fluctuations in \(P_h\), respectively. It is clear from the profiles that for a constant level of phosphatase, \(\sigma_{R_p}^2\) reduces appreciably compared to the fluctuating \(P_h\) level. This result suggests that stochastic kinetics of \(P_h\) has a significant role in the fluctuations associated with \(R_p\) in the monofunctional system. To quantify cellular fluctuations that affect phosphotransfer mechanism within the TCS, we calculate Fano factor (\(\sigma_{R_p}^2/\langle R_p \rangle\)) at steady state. In Fig. [\[fig2\]](#fig2){reference-type="ref" reference="fig2"}(c), we have shown the profile of Fano factor for the monofunctional and the bifunctional systems (solid and dashed line, respectively) as a function of mean extra-cellular inducer level, where both profiles show decaying characteristics. Beyond a certain inducer level, Fano factor for the bifunctional system (dashed line) abruptly goes down to zero which can be attributed to the decaying nature of its variance shown in Fig. [\[fig2\]](#fig2){reference-type="ref" reference="fig2"}(b). The pool of \(R_p\) generated in the monofunctional system is not high enough to overcome fluctuations induced by the phosphatase \(P_h\) and as a result, the fluctuations for this system maintain a low non zero value compared to the bifunctional system. In addition to the Fano factor, we have also calculated the coefficient of variation (CV), i.e., \(\sigma_{R_p}/\langle R_p \rangle\). In Fig. [\[fig4\]](#fig4){reference-type="ref" reference="fig4"}, we show the steady state CV profile for both monofunctional and bifunctional systems. As mentioned earlier, the specific job of a TCS is to sense change in the extra-cellular environment and to transduce this information downstream reliably. To check how functionality of the sensor kinase affects fidelity (signal to noise ratio) of the signal processing mechanism, we calculate the quantity mutual information \({\cal I} (I,R_p)\) using the definition of Shannon \[\begin{aligned} {\cal I} (I,R_p) = \frac{1}{2} \log_2 \left ( 1+ \frac{\sigma^4_{IR_p}}{|C|} \right ); C = \left ( \begin{array}{cc} \sigma^2_{II} & \sigma^2_{IR_p} \\ \sigma^2_{IR_p} & \sigma^2_{R_pR_p} \end{array} \right ), \end{aligned}\] where \[\begin{aligned} \sigma^2_{II} = \langle I \rangle, \sigma^2_{IR_p} = \frac{ J_{R_pS_p} J_{S_pI} \langle I \rangle }{ (\alpha_i + J_{II})(\beta_i + J_{II}), } \end{aligned}\] In the above relation, \(i=m\) or \(i=b\) depending on monofunctional and bifunctional system, respectively. Expressions for \(\sigma^2_{R_pR_p} (\equiv \sigma^2_{R_p})\) are given in Eqs. ([\[varm\]](#varm){reference-type="ref" reference="varm"},[\[varb\]](#varb){reference-type="ref" reference="varb"}) for the two systems, respectively. Note that the quantity \(\sigma_{IR_p}^4/|C|\) stands for fidelity or signal to noise ratio . In Fig. [\[fig2\]](#fig2){reference-type="ref" reference="fig2"}(d), we show mutual information profile for the monofunctional (solid line) and the bifunctional (dashed line) systems as a function of extra-cellular inducer level. Information processing by both systems show a decaying profile as the extra-cellular inducer level is increased. However, for a wide range of inducer level, information processing by the bifunctional system is higher than the monofunctional one. Beyond a certain value of the inducer level, information profile of the bifunctional system goes down and becomes equal to the profile of the monofunctional system. This result suggests that reliability of the bifunctional system in processing the information of the extra-cellular environment is higher than that of the monofunctional system. To check the specific role of kinase and phosphatase rate on information processing within TCS further, we calculate Fano factor and \({\cal I} (I,R_p)\) as a function of kinase and phosphatase rate. In Figs. [\[fig5\]](#fig5){reference-type="ref" reference="fig5"}(a)-[\[fig5\]](#fig5){reference-type="ref" reference="fig5"}(b), we show two dimensional map of Fano factor and mutual information, respectively, for monofunctional system as a function of \(k_k\) and \(k_{pm}\). Figs. [\[fig5\]](#fig5){reference-type="ref" reference="fig5"}(c)-[\[fig5\]](#fig5){reference-type="ref" reference="fig5"}(d) show the same for bifunctional system as a function of \(k_k\) and \(k_{pb}\). Fig. [\[fig5\]](#fig5){reference-type="ref" reference="fig5"}(a) shows that for high kinase and moderate phosphatase rate, the fluctuations level of phosphorylated response regulator becomes maximum otherwise it maintains a low value. This happens due to low copy number of proteins produced under high phosphatase regime. For the bifunctional system, the fluctuations level maintains a low value for a wide range of kinase and low phosphatase rate (see Fig. [\[fig5\]](#fig5){reference-type="ref" reference="fig5"}(c)). Other than that, the fluctuations increase due to increase in the phosphatase activity of the sensor protein. It is important to mention that maximum fluctuations level for the bifunctional system spans a wider region in the kinase-phosphatase plane compared to the monofunctional system. Figs. [\[fig5\]](#fig5){reference-type="ref" reference="fig5"}(b,d) show mutual information for monofunctional and bifunctional system, respectively. In both cases, signal processing capacity increases for high kinase and high phosphatase rate. In the regime of high kinase and high phosphatase activity, fluctuations in the \(R_p\) copy number can reliably sense the fluctuations due to extra-cellular stimulus which, in turn, effectively increases the signal processing capacity. In addition, due to structural advantage, information processing is better for the bifunctional system. Our analysis suggests that the bifunctional system can transduce external stimulus more reliably than the monofunctional one. Effective signal transduction mechanism of the bifunctional system can be attributed to its sensor domain which has synchronized kinase and phosphatase activity. On the other hand, the monofunctional system lacks such a synchronization due to the absence of phosphatase activity in the sensor domain. At this point, one can ask the question, 'Is it possible to increase the activity of a monofunctional system by varying the contribution of one or more system components?' To answer this question we further looked into the signal transduction motif of the monofunctional system and found that due to the auxiliary protein \(P_h\), the monofunctional TCS is unable to attain the activity of the bifunctional one. Using this phenomenological information, one may hypothesize that by reducing the effect of \(P_h\), activity of the monofunctional system can be increased. To check this hypothesis, we have systematically reduced the concentration of \(P_h\) by reducing the synthesis rate (\(k_{sP_h}\)) of \(P_h\) from high to low value and calculated all physical quantities reported in Fig. [\[fig2\]](#fig2){reference-type="ref" reference="fig2"} (see Fig. [\[fig6\]](#fig6){reference-type="ref" reference="fig6"}). As the level of \(P_h\) goes down, the phosphatase activity on the response regulator becomes more ineffective, and hence increases the pool of \(R_p\) (see Fig. [\[fig6\]](#fig6){reference-type="ref" reference="fig6"}(a)). For a low amount of \(P_h\), \(R_p\) level reaches the maximum value, as attained by the bifunctional system, quite early. This suggests that using the parameter set of the model and by lowering the amount of \(P_h\), a monofunctional system can attain a large pool of \(R_p\) even at a very low level of inducer. At a very low level of \(P_h\), most of the response regulators get phosphorylated, henceforth reducing fluctuations in the \(R_p\) level (see Figs. [\[fig6\]](#fig6){reference-type="ref" reference="fig6"}(b),[\[fig6\]](#fig6){reference-type="ref" reference="fig6"}(c)). Interestingly, mutual information for the monofunctional system goes down with lowering of \(P_h\) (see Fig. [\[fig6\]](#fig6){reference-type="ref" reference="fig6"}(d)). By reducing the level of \(P_h\), fluctuations in \(R_p\) level can be reduced, which, in turn, makes the system independent of fluctuations due to external stimulus. As a result, one observes suppression of mutual information. Fluctuations due to inherent noisy biochemical reactions play an important role in gene regulation by imposing phenotypic heterogeneity within genetically identical cells . This happens due to fluctuations induced distribution of proteins in identical cells. In the present study, the TCS network output (\(R_p\)) shows maximal and minimal level of fluctuations for low and high stimulus, respectively. In addition to that, the bifunctional system maintains a lower noise profile compared to the monofunctional one. These results together suggest that the bifunctional system controlled gene regulation may have lesser variability (lower Fano factor) compared to the monofunctional system for intermediate to high stimulus level. To verify difference in variability in TCS controlled gene regulation, we consider a simple model of gene expression in the following section. ## TCS mediated gene regulation To understand the role of TCS on downstream genes, we consider a simple model of gene regulation mediated by either monofunctional or bifunctional TCS \[\label{gr1} \overset{k_1 f(R_p)}{\longrightarrow} X \overset{k_2}{\longrightarrow} \varnothing,\] where \(X\) is the gene product whose synthesis is controlled by the transcription factor \(R_p\), output of TCS. The function \(f(R_p)\) takes care of promoter switching mechanism associated with the downstream gene and is given by \(f(R_p)=R_p/(K+R_p)\), with \(K\) being the binding constant. While modeling promoter switching mechanism, we have considered positive regulation by \(R_p\). The stochastic differential equation associated with Eq. ([\[gr1\]](#gr1){reference-type="ref" reference="gr1"}) is given by \[\label{gr2} \frac{dX}{dt} = k_1 f(R_p)-k_2 X +\] with \(\langle\)Fourier transformation of the linearized version of Eq. ([\[gr2\]](#gr2){reference-type="ref" reference="gr2"}) yields \[\label{gr3} \delta \tilde{X} (\omega) = k_1 \left [ \frac{\delta f(R_p)}{\delta R_p} \right ]_{ss} \frac{\delta \tilde{R}_p(\omega)}{(i\omega+k_2)} + \frac{\tilde{\] where \(\left [\delta f(R_p)/\delta R_p \right ]_{ss} = K/(K+\langle R_p \rangle)^2\), evaluated at steady state (\(ss\)). Now, using expression of \(\delta \tilde{X}\), we derive variance associated with \(X\), \[\label{gr4} \sigma^2_X = k_1^2 \left [ \frac{\delta f(R_p)}{\delta R_p} \right ]_{ss}^2 \frac{\sigma_{R_p}^2}{k_2} + \langle X \rangle.\] Note that in Eq. ([\[gr4\]](#gr4){reference-type="ref" reference="gr4"}), fluctuations due to the output of TCS is embedded in the expression of \(\sigma_{R_p}^2\), which is different for the monofunctional and the bifunctional system (see Eq. ([\[varm\]](#varm){reference-type="ref" reference="varm"}) and Eq. ([\[varb\]](#varb){reference-type="ref" reference="varb"}), respectively). Main panel of Fig. [\[fig7\]](#fig7){reference-type="ref" reference="fig7"} shows steady state \(\langle X \rangle\) as a function of mean inducer level \(\langle I \rangle\) controlled by monofunctional (solid line with open circle) and bifunctional system (dashed line with open square). It is evident from the profiles of \(\langle X \rangle\) that the bifunctional regulated system produces more downstream protein as \(\langle I \rangle\) is increased. This happens due to availability of larger amount of \(\langle R_p \rangle\) produced by the bifunctional system compared to the monofunctional one, for a fixed amount of \(\langle I \rangle\) (see Fig. [\[fig2\]](#fig2){reference-type="ref" reference="fig2"}(a)). Fig. [\[fig7\]](#fig7){reference-type="ref" reference="fig7"}(b) depicts Fano factor (\(\sigma^2_X/\langle X \rangle\)) associated with downstream protein and shows that fluctuations in \(X\) controlled by the bifunctional system is lower compared to the monofunctional system. Fluctuations in \(X\) is controlled by fluctuations in \(R_p\), as shown in Eq. ([\[gr4\]](#gr4){reference-type="ref" reference="gr4"}). As fluctuations associated with \(R_p\) due to the bifunctional system is lower than the monofunctional system (see Fig. [\[fig2\]](#fig2){reference-type="ref" reference="fig2"}(c)), its contribution in Fano factor associated with X is low. In the previous discussion, we have shown that for a fixed level of inducer, a bifunctional system produces more \(R_p\) compared to a monofunctional system (see Fig. [\[fig2\]](#fig2){reference-type="ref" reference="fig2"}(a)). From this observation, we commented that a bifunctional system is more effective than a monofunctional one in regulating downstream genes for intermediate to high inducer level. To verify our remark, we numerically calculate probability distribution of \(R_p\) (transcription factor for target gene) for monofunctional and bifunctional system (solid and dashed lines in inset (1)-(3) of Fig. [\[fig7\]](#fig7){reference-type="ref" reference="fig7"}) for different values of \(\langle I \rangle\) and check whether they are able to cross the fixed \(\langle X \rangle\) value (vertical dotted line in inset (1)-(3) of Fig. [\[fig7\]](#fig7){reference-type="ref" reference="fig7"}). The distribution profiles give an idea of whether the pool of \(R_p\) is able to generate a fixed level of gene product, in presence of inducer. For this, we set the value of downstream product \(X\) at 3 \(\mu\)M (horizontal dotted line in the main panel of Fig. [\[fig7\]](#fig7){reference-type="ref" reference="fig7"}) which intercepts both profiles of \(\langle X \rangle\) at two different values of \(\langle I \rangle\). To be explicit, for \(\langle I \rangle = 3.2 \mu\)M and \(5.6 \mu\)M, the horizontal dotted line intercepts the profile of bifunctional and monofunctional system, respectively. This, in turn, generates three different regions of \(\langle I \rangle\), (1), (2) and (3) shown in the main panel of Fig. [\[fig7\]](#fig7){reference-type="ref" reference="fig7"}. When value of \(\langle I \rangle\) lies within region (1), the distribution profiles of \(R_p\) for both systems are unable to cross the required value of \(\langle X \rangle\) (inset (1) of Fig. [\[fig7\]](#fig7){reference-type="ref" reference="fig7"}). This scenario changes as we move to region (2). In this region, the distribution profile of the bifunctional system crosses target \(\langle X \rangle\) value, but the distribution profile of the monofunctional system is unable to cross the same (inset (2) of Fig. [\[fig7\]](#fig7){reference-type="ref" reference="fig7"})). This happens due to low and high pool of \(R_p\) generated by monofunctional and bifunctional system, respectively. As we further move to region (3), we see that the distribution profiles of both the systems are able to cross the target \(\langle X \rangle\) value as both produce enough \(R_p\) to achieve the goal. # Conclusion To conclude, we have developed a stochastic model for signal transduction mechanism in bacterial TCS. The proposed model takes into account the difference in the functionality of the sensor kinase. This difference in functionality leads to a classification of the TCS, viz., monofunctional and bifunctional. Considering only the phosphotransfer mechanism within TCS triggered by external stimulus, we have derived Langevin equation associated with system components for both systems (monofunctional and bifunctional). Using the expression of phosphorylated response regulators, we have calculated different physically realizable quantities, viz., variance, Fano factor (variance/mean), mutual information at steady state. Our analysis suggests that at low external stimulus, both systems reliably transduce information due to changes made in the extra-cellular environment. Moreover, due to functional difference of the sensor kinase, it has been observed that fidelity of the bifunctional system is higher than that of the monofunctional system. Functionality of monofunctional system has been predicted to be increasable by reducing the amount of auxiliary protein (\(P_h\)) which can be tested experimentally. We further extend our analysis by studying TCS mediated gene regulation which shows that the bifunctional system is more effective in producing target gene product for intermediate to high inducer level with lesser variability.

{'timestamp': '2014-03-21T01:09:15', 'yymm': '1401', 'arxiv_id': '1401.5893', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5893'}

# Introduction In recent years, the channel capacity and the design of optimum transmission strategies for multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) multiple access channels (MAC) have been widely studied. However, most works on MIMO MAC rely on the critical assumption of Gaussian input signals. Although Gaussian inputs are optimal in theory, they are rarely used in practice. Rather, it is well-known that practical communication signals usually are drawn from finite constellation sets, such as pulse amplitude modulation (PAM), phase shift keying (PSK) modulation, and quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM). These finite constellation sets differ significantly from the Gaussian idealization. Accordingly, transmission schemes designed based on the Gaussian input assumption may result in substantial performance losses when finite alphabet inputs are used for transmission. For the case of the two-user single-input single-output MAC with finite alphabet inputs, the optimal angle of rotation and the optimal power division between the transmit signals were found in and, respectively. For the MIMO MAC with an arbitrary number of users and generic antenna configurations, an iterative algorithm for searching for the optimal precoding matrices of all users was proposed in. The transmission schemes in require accurate instantaneous channel state information (CSI) available at the transmitters for precoder design. However, in some applications, the obtained instantaneous CSI at the transmitters might be outdated. Therefore, for these scenarios, it is more reasonable to exploit the channel statistics at the transmitter for precoder design, as they change much slower than the instantaneous channel parameters. For finite alphabet inputs, for point-to-point systems, an efficient precoding algorithm for maximization of the ergodic capacity over Kronecker fading channels was developed in. Also, in, asymptotic (in the large-system limit) expressions for the mutual information of the MIMO MAC with Kronecker fading were derived. Despite these previous works, the study of the MIMO MAC with statistical CSI at the transmitter and finite alphabet inputs remains incomplete, for two reasons: First, the Kronecker fading model characterizes the correlations of the transmit and the receive antennas separately, which is often not in agreement with measurements. In contrast, jointly-correlated fading models, such as Weichselberger's model, do not only account for the correlations at both ends of the link, but also characterize their mutual dependence. As a consequence, Weichselberger's model provides a more general representation of MIMO channels. Second, systematic precoder designs for statistical CSI at the transmitter for the MIMO MAC with finite alphabet inputs have not been reported yet, even for the Kronecker fading model. In this paper, we investigate the linear precoder design for the \(K\)-user MIMO MAC assuming Weichselberger's fading model, finite alphabet inputs, and availability of statistical CSI at the transmitter. By exploiting a random matrix theory tool from statistical physics, called the replica method[^1], we first derive an asymptotic expression for the weighted sum rate (WSR) of the MIMO MAC for Weichselberger's fading model in the large-system regime where the numbers of transmit and receive antenna both approach infinity. The derived expression indicates that the WSR can be obtained asymptotically by calculating the mutual information of each user separately over equivalent deterministic channels. This property significantly reduces the computational effort for calculation of the WSR. Furthermore, exploiting Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) analysis, we establish necessary conditions for the optimal precoding matrices for asymptotic WSR maximization. This analysis facilities the derivation of an efficient iterative gradient descent algorithm[^2] for finding the optimal precoders of all users. In the proposed algorithm, the search space for the design of the precoding matrix of each user is only the user's own modulation set. Accordingly, denoting the number of transmit antennas and the size of the modulation set of user \(k\) by \(N_t\) and \(Q_k\), respectively, the dimensionality of the search space for finding the precoding matrices of all users with the proposed algorithm is \(\sum\nolimits_{k = 1}^K {Q_k^{2 N_t } }\), whereas the dimensionality of the search space of the algorithm employing instantaneous CSI at the transmitter in is \(\left( {\prod\nolimits_{k = 1}^K {Q_k } } \right)^{ 2 N_t }\). This indicates that the proposed algorithm does not only provide a systematic precoder design method for the MIMO MAC with statistical CSI at the transmitter, but also reduces the implementation complexity by *several orders of magnitude* compared to the precoder design for instantaneous CSI. Moreover, the precoder designed for statistical CSI has to be updated much less frequently than the precoder designed for instantaneous CSI as the channel statistics change very slowly compared to the instantaneous CSI. In addition, unlike the algorithm in, the proposed algorithm does not require the computationally expensive simulation over each channel realization. Numerical results demonstrate that the proposed design provides substantial performance gains over systems without precoding and systems employing precoders designed under the Gaussian input assumption. The following notations are adopted throughout the paper: Column vectors are represented by lower-case bold-face letters, and matrices are represented by upper-case bold-face letters. Superscripts \((\cdot)^{T}\), \((\cdot)^{*}\), and \((\cdot)^{H}\) stand for the matrix/vector transpose, conjugate, and conjugate-transpose operations, respectively. \(\rm{det}(\cdot)\) and \(\rm{tr}(\cdot)\) denote the matrix determinant and trace operations, respectively. \({\rm{diag}}\left\{\bf{b}\right\}\) and \({\rm{blockdiag}}\left\{{\bf{A}}_k\right\}_{k=1}^{K}\) denote diagonal matrix and block diagonal matrix containing in the main diagonal (or block diagonal) the elements of vector \(\bf{b}\) and matrices \({\bf{A}}_k, k=1,2,\cdots,K\), respectively. \(\odot\) and \(\bigotimes\) denote the element-wise product and the Kronecker product of two matrices. \({\rm vec} \left(\mathbf{A}\right)\) returns a column vector whose entries are the ordered stack of columns of \(\mathbf{A}\). \([\mathbf{A}]_{mn}\) denotes the element in the \(m\)th row and \(n\)th column of matrix \(\mathbf{A}\). \(\left\| {\mathbf{X}} \right\|_F\) denotes the Frobenius norm of matrix \(\mathbf{X}\). \({\mathbf{I}}_M\) denotes an \(M \times M\) identity matrix, and \(E_V\left[\cdot \right]\) represents the expectation with respect to random variable \(V\), which can be a scalar, vector, or matrix. # System Model {#sec:model} Consider a MIMO MAC system with \(K\) independent users. We suppose each of the \(K\) users has \(N_t\) transmit antennas and the receiver has \(N_r\) antennas. Then, the received signal \(\mathbf{y} \in \mathbb{C}^{N_r \times 1}\) is given by \[\label{model} {\bf{y}} = \sum\limits_{k = 1}^K {{\bf{H}}_k {\bf{x}}_k } + {\bf{v}}\] [^1]: We note that the replica method has been applied to communications problems before. [^2]: It is noted that although we derive the asymptotic WSR in the large-system regime, the proposed algorithm can also be applied for systems with a finite number of antennas.

{'timestamp': '2014-01-22T02:11:29', 'yymm': '1401', 'arxiv_id': '1401.5401', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5401'}

# Introduction Systems of ultracold bosonic gases in optical lattices represent nowadays a popular research topic , as they establish a versatile bridge between the field of ultracold quantum matter and solid-state systems. In particular, they can be experimentally controlled with a yet unprecedented level of precision. With this it is now possible to achieve strong correlations and, due to the absence of impurities, they are viewed as idealized condensed matter systems, which allow for a clear theoretical analysis and which are even predestined as universal quantum simulators. Recently a new degree of freedom to tune the properties of quantum matter has emerged which is based on a real-time modulation of some lattice parameter. For instance, it was predicted in Ref.  and later on confirmed experimentally in Refs.  that the Bose-Hubbard model for a periodically shaken optical lattice can be approximately reduced for a sufficiently large frequency to an effective time-independent Bose-Hubbard model with a renormalized hopping parameter. This technique was recently applied to induce dynamically the Mott-insulator (MI) to superfluid (SF) transition. Other proposed applications concern the quantum simulation of frustrated classical magnetism as well as the generation of abelian and non-abelian gauge fields. Recently, this line of research culminated in the experimental realization of the Hofstadter or Harper Hamiltonian with ultracold atoms in optical lattices. Another method to periodically drive an ultracold quantum gas system relies on a periodic modulation of the s-wave scattering length, which can be experimentally achieved, for instance, in the vicinity of a broad Feshbach resonance. For a harmonically trapped Bose-Einstein condensate this induces various phenomena of nonlinear dynamics as, for instance, mode coupling, higher harmonics generation, and significant shifts in the frequencies of collective modes (see, for instance, Ref.  and the references therein). Therefore, a periodic modulation of the interaction represents an important new tool for building more versatile quantum simulators. In this work we investigate the effect of a periodic modulation of the s-wave scattering length for bosons in an optical lattice. Using the Floquet formalism we show that the underlying driven Bose-Hubbard model can be understood for large enough driving frequencies in terms of an effective conditional hopping in the sense that its value depends on the respective particle numbers of the involved neighboring sites. Such conditional hopping amplitudes represent an interesting class of models, which have an intricate history in condensed matter physics. Correlated or conditional hopping already appeared, for instance, in the very first paper, where the Hubbard model was proposed, due to matrix elements of the Coulomb interaction between nearest neighbor Wannier wave functions. However, such occupation-dependent hopping terms are usually smaller than the typical hopping and on-site interaction, so they can be neglected. Later on, such terms were reconsidered as an alternative scheme for high-\(T_c\) superconductivity. For particular parameter values the Hamiltonian for a Hubbard chain turns out to be integrable and displays fractional statistics. The occupation-number sensitivity of tunnelling was even implemented experimentally by employing the high-resolution quantum gas microscope technique. Whereas all these works deal with real-valued conditional hopping terms, a density-dependent Peirls phase was recently proposed in Ref.  in the context of realizing anyons in one-dimensional lattices. One goal of this work is to develop analytical tools in order to study the the quantum phase diagram of conditional hopping models in quantitative detail. In the following we focus on the case of a 2D square and a 3D cubic lattice, where the conditional hopping allows to tune the superfluid-Mott insulator quantum phase transition. Consequences for the one-dimensional lattice problem have already been discussed in detail in Ref. , where a large enough driving induces pair superfluidity. In Section [2](#section2){reference-type="ref" reference="section2"} we review in detail how the periodically driven Bose-Hubbard model reduces approximately to an effective time-independent model with conditional hopping. Afterwards, we combine in Section [3](#section3){reference-type="ref" reference="section3"} different analytical approaches with quantum Monte-Carlo (QMC) simulations in order to determine how the MI-SF quantum phase boundary depends on the driving amplitude. A more quantitative analysis in Section [4](#section4){reference-type="ref" reference="section4"} shows that the effect of driving can even be described within the usual Bose-Hubbard model provided that the hopping is rescaled appropriately with the driving amplitude. This finding indicates that the Bose-Hubbard model with a periodically driven s-wave scattering length and the usual Bose-Hubbard model belong to the same universality class from the point of view of critical phenomena. # Model {#section2} We start with the derivation that a Bose-Hubbard Hamiltonian with a periodic modulation of the s-wave scattering length can approximately be mapped for large driving frequencies with the help of Floquet theory to an effective time-independent Hamiltonian with a conditional hopping. ## Time-Dependent Hamiltonian In the following we study a system of spinless bosons in a homogeneous lattice of arbitrary dimension \(D\) with a periodically modulated s-wave scattering length, which can be experimentally achieved, for instance, in the vicinity of a broad Feshbach resonance. This periodically driven quantum many-body system is described by the time-dependent Hamiltonian \[\begin{aligned} \hat{H}(t)&=&\sum_{i} \left\{ \frac{1}{2} \Big[ U + A \cos\left(\omega t\right) \Big] \left(\hat{n}_{i}^{2}-\hat{n}_{i}\right)-\mu \hat{n}_{i} \right\} \nonumber \\& &-\sum_{ij}t_{ij}\hat{a}^{\dag}_{i}\hat{a}_{j} \. \label{H} \end{aligned}\] Here \(\hat{a}^{\dag}_{i}\), \(\hat{a}_{j}\) denote the annihilation, creation operators fulfilling the standard bosonic commutator relations and \(\hat{n}_{i}=\hat{a}^{\dag}_{i}\hat{a}_{i}\) represents the particle number operator. Furthermore, \(t_{ij}\) stand for the respective hopping matrix elements between the sites \(i\) and \(j\), which are usually non-zero only for nearest neighboring sites \(i\) and \(j\) with \(t_{ij}=t\). The local time-independent part depends on the repulsive on-site energy \(U\) as well as on the chemical potential \(\mu\) due to the grand-canonical description. Furthermore, the periodic modulation of the s-wave scattering length is described by the amplitude \(A\) and the frequency \(\omega\). Thus, the external driving leads to a quadratic dependence on the particle number operator, whereas a shaken optical lattice only involves a corresponding linear dependence. ## Floquet Basis For the sake of generality we observe that the Hamiltonian ([\[H\]](#H){reference-type="ref" reference="H"}) is of the form \[\begin{aligned} \hat{H}(t)=\sum_{i}\Big[ f \left( \hat{n}_{i} \right) +Ag \left(\hat{n}_{i}\right)\cos\left(\omega t\right)\Big]-\sum_{ij}t_{ij}\hat{a}^{\dag}_{i}\hat{a}_{j} \,, \label{HH} \end{aligned}\] where the local time-independent part reads \[\label{f} f (\hat{n}_{i})=\frac{U}{2} \left(\hat{n}_{i}^{2}-\hat{n}_{i}\right)-\mu \hat{n}_{i}\, ,\] and the local time-dependent part is described by the operator \[\label{g} g_{i}(\hat{n}_{i})=\frac{1}{2}\left(\hat{n}^{2}_{i}-\hat{n}_{i}\right) \,.\] In the following we perform a detailed analysis of the general Hamiltonian ([\[HH\]](#HH){reference-type="ref" reference="HH"}) with arbitrary operators \(f (\hat{n}_{i})\) and \(g (\hat{n}_{i})\). In view of choosing a suitable basis, we start with collecting all local terms in the unperturbed Hamiltonian \[\begin{aligned} \hat{H}_{0}(t)=\sum_{i}\Big[ f(\hat{n}_{i}) +Ag_{i}(\hat{n}_{i})\cos\left(\omega t\right)\Big] \,,\hspace*{1mm} \label{H0} \end{aligned}\] which fulfills the periodicity condition \[\label{PH} \hat{H}_{0}(t)=\hat{H}_{0}(t+T)\] with period \(T=2\pi/\omega\). Therefore, we can use the Floquet theory which states that the Schrödinger equation \[i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial t} | \psi (t) \rangle = \hat{H}_0(t)| \psi (t) \rangle\] has Floquet solutions \[| \psi_{\alpha} (t) \rangle = | \alpha (t) \rangle e^{-i \varepsilon(\alpha) t / \hbar}\] with some quantum number \(\alpha\), where the Floquet functions \(| \alpha (t) \rangle\) have the same periodicity ([\[PH\]](#PH){reference-type="ref" reference="PH"}) as the unperturbed Hamiltonian \(\hat{H}_0(t)\), i.e. \[\label{P} | \alpha (t) \rangle = | \alpha (t+T) \rangle \.\] These Floquet functions \(| \alpha (t) \rangle\) and the corresponding quasienergies \(\varepsilon(\alpha)\) thus fulfill the eigenvalue problem \[\label{EV} \hat{\mathcal{H}}_{0} (t) | \alpha (t) \rangle = \varepsilon(\alpha) \, | \alpha (t) \rangle\] with the corresponding Floquet Hamiltonian \[\hat{\mathcal{H}}_{0}(t)=\hat{H}_{0}(t)-i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial t} \.\] In order to solve the eigenvalue problem ([\[EV\]](#EV){reference-type="ref" reference="EV"}) of the unperturbed Hamiltonian ([\[H0\]](#H0){reference-type="ref" reference="H0"}), one introduces an extended Hilbert space , in which the time \(t\) is explicitly considered as a separate coordinate. Two \(T\)-periodic functions \(|u_{1}(t)\rangle\) and \(|u_{2}(t)\rangle\), which have the scalar product \(\langle u_{1}(t)|u_{2}(t)\rangle\) in the usual Hilbert space, then have a modified scalar product in the extended space which reads \[\label{SC} \langle\langle u_{1}(t)|u_{2}(t)\rangle\rangle = \frac{1}{T}\int_0^T dt \,\langle u_{1}(t)|u_{2}(t)\rangle \.\] Now in the extended Hilbert space, the eigenvalue problem ([\[EV\]](#EV){reference-type="ref" reference="EV"}) can be solved exactly within the occupation number representation. This yields the Floquet functions \[\begin{aligned} \label{SOL} |\{n_{i}\}, m (t) \rangle\rangle = e^{i m \omega t} \prod_{i} \left[ e^{-\frac{i A g(n_i)}{\hbar \omega} \sin (\omega t)} |n_{i}\rangle_i \right] \, , \end{aligned}\] where \(|n_{i}\rangle_i\) represents the occupation number basis at site \(i\), and the Floquet eigenvalues read \[\begin{aligned} \label{FE} \varepsilon (\{n_{i}\}, m)=\sum_{i} f (n_{i})+m\hbar \omega \,. \end{aligned}\] Furthermore, demanding the periodicity condition ([\[P\]](#P){reference-type="ref" reference="P"}) for the Floquet functions ([\[SOL\]](#SOL){reference-type="ref" reference="SOL"}) requires that the quantum number \(m\) must be an integer. Thus, the quasienergy spectrum ([\[FE\]](#FE){reference-type="ref" reference="FE"}) repeats itself periodically on the energy axis. ## Time-Independent Hamiltonian Now we further investigate the full Floquet Hamiltonian \[\hat{\cal{H}}(t) =\hat{H}(t)-i\hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial t}\] within the extended Hilbert space by determining its corresponding matrix elements with respect to the Floquet functions: \[\begin{aligned} \hat{\cal {H}}_{\{ n'_{i}\},m';\{ n_{i}\},m}&=& \langle\langle \{n'_{i}\} ,m' |\hat{\cal{H}}| \{n_{i}\}, m \rangle \rangle \,. \end{aligned}\] Using ([\[HH\]](#HH){reference-type="ref" reference="HH"}) and ([\[SC\]](#SC){reference-type="ref" reference="SC"})--([\[FE\]](#FE){reference-type="ref" reference="FE"}) these matrix elements turn out to be \[\begin{aligned} &&\hat{\cal {H}}_{\{ n'_{i}\},m';\{ n_{i}\},m}= \delta_{m,m^{'}} \left[ \sum_{i} f (n_{i})+m\hbar \omega \right] \delta_{\{ n'_{i}\},\{ n_{i}\}} \nonumber \\ &&-\sum_{ij} t_{ij} \langle \{n'_{i}\}|\hat{a}^{\dag}_{i} J_{m-m^{'}}\left( G(\hat{n}_{i},\hat{n}_{j}) \right)\hat{a}_{j} |\{ n_{j} \} \rangle \,, \end{aligned}\] where \(J_{m-m^{'}}\) represents a Bessel function of first kind with the argument \[\begin{aligned} \label{G} G(\hat{n}_{i},\hat{n}_{j}) = \frac{g(\hat{n}_{j})-g(\hat{n}_{j}-1)+g(\hat{n}_{i})-g(\hat{n}_{i}+1)}{\hbar\omega} \,. \end{aligned}\] Now it is in order to take into account the physical constraints upon the driving frequency \(\omega\). On the one hand the excitation energy \(\hbar \omega\) must be much smaller than the gap between the lowest and the first excited energy band, otherwise a single-band Bose-Hubbard model would no longer be a valid description. On the other hand the excitation energy \(\hbar \omega\) must also be much larger than the system parameters \(t_{ij}\) and \(U\), so that transitions between states with \(m \neq m'\) are highly suppressed. Thus, in the latter case only terms with \(m=m'\) have to be taken into account, so the original time-dependent Hamiltonian ([\[HH\]](#HH){reference-type="ref" reference="HH"}) is mapped approximately to the effective time-independent Hamiltonian \[\begin{aligned} \hat{H}_{\rm eff}&=&\sum_{i}f (\hat{n}_{i}) -\sum_{ij}t_{ij}\hat{a}_{i}^{\dag}J_{0}\left(G(\hat{n}_{i},\hat{n}_{j})\right)\hat{a}_{j} \,. \label{heff0} \end{aligned}\] Specializing ([\[G\]](#G){reference-type="ref" reference="G"}) and ([\[heff0\]](#heff0){reference-type="ref" reference="heff0"}) for the case of a periodic modulation of the s-wave scattering length ([\[f\]](#f){reference-type="ref" reference="f"}) and ([\[g\]](#g){reference-type="ref" reference="g"}) then finally yields : \[\begin{aligned} \hat{H}_{\rm eff}&=&\sum_{i}\left[ \frac{U}{2}\hat{n}_{i}(\hat{n}_{i}-1)-\mu \hat{n}_{i} \right]\nonumber \\ &&-\sum_{ij}t_{ij}\hat{a}_{i}^{\dag}J_{0}\left(\frac{A}{\hbar \omega}(\hat{n}_{j}-\hat{n}_{i})\right)\hat{a}_{j} \,. \label{heff} \end{aligned}\] For typical experimental parameters this means that the driving frequency \(\omega\) must be of the order of kHz. According to ([\[heff\]](#heff){reference-type="ref" reference="heff"}) we can then conclude that the effect of the time-periodic modulation of the s-wave scattering length essentially leads to a renormalization of the hopping matrix elements. But in contrast to the shaken optical lattice treated in Ref. , this renormalization yields an effective conditional hopping in the sense that it depends via the Bessel function \(J_0\) on the respective particle numbers \(n_i\) and \(n_j\) at the involved sites \(i\) and \(j\). # Quantum Phase Diagram {#section3} Now we determine the quantum phase diagram for the effective time-independent Hamiltonian ([\[heff\]](#heff){reference-type="ref" reference="heff"}) with conditional nearest neighbor hopping at zero temperature. As the corresponding one-dimensional lattice problem has already been discussed in detail in Ref. , we restrict us here to the higher dimensional cases of a 2D square and a 3D cubic lattice. In order to obtain reliable results we combine different analytical approaches with quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) simulations. ## Effective Potential Landau Theory In order to deal analytically with the spontaneous symmetry breaking of the inherent U(1) symmetry of bosons in an optical lattice the Effective Potential Landau Theory (EPLT) has turned out to be quite successful. Whereas the lowest order of EPLT leads to similar results as mean-field theory, higher hopping orders have recently been evaluated via the process-chain approach, which determines the location of the quantum phase transition to a similar precision as demanding quantum Monte Carlo simulations. Here we follow Refs.  and couple at first the annihilation and creation operators to external source fields with uniform strength \(j^*\) and \(j\): \[\hat{H}_{\rm eff}(j^{*},j)=\hat{H}_{\rm eff}+\sum_{i}\left(j^{*}\hat{a}_{i}+j\hat{a}_{i}^\dagger\right) \,.\] Then we calculate the ground-state energy, which coincides with the grand-canonical free energy at zero temperature. For vanishing source fields and hopping the unperturbed ground-state energy reads \(F_0=N_{\rm s} f(n)\) with the total number of sites \(N_{\rm s}\) and the abbreviation \(f(n)=U n(n-1)/2-\mu n\). In order to have \(n\) particles per site, the chemical potential has to fulfill the condition \((n-1)<\mu/U<n\). By applying Rayleigh-Schrödinger theory, we can then determine the grand-canonical free energy perturbatively. An expansion with respect to the source fields yields \[F(j,j^{*};t)=F_{0}+N_{s}\left(\sum_{p=1}^{\infty} c_{2p}(t)\left|j \right|^{2p}\right)\,, \label{ex}\] where the coefficients \(c_{2p}(t)\) can be written in a power series of the hopping matrix element \(t\) \[c_{2p}(t)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}(-t)^{n}\alpha_{2p}^{(n)} \,. \label{coeff}\] Performing a truncation at first hopping order, we get for \(p=1\) \[\alpha_{2}^{(0)}=\frac{n+1}{f(n)-f(n+1)}+\frac{n}{f(n)-f(n-1)} \label{alpha0}\] and \[\begin{aligned} \alpha_{2}^{(1)}&=&z\left[\frac{n+1}{f(n)-f(n+1)}+\frac{n}{f(n)-f(n-1)}\right]^{2} \nonumber \\ & &+z\frac{2(n+1)n\left[J_{0}\left(\frac{A}{\hbar \omega}\right)-1\right]}{\left[f(n)-f(n+1)\right]\left[f(n)-f(n-1)\right]}\,, \label{alpha1} \end{aligned}\] where \(z=2D\) denotes the coordination number, i.e. the number of nearest neighbor sites. Note that the first line on the right-hand side of Eq. ([\[alpha1\]](#alpha1){reference-type="ref" reference="alpha1"}) equals to \(z \left[\alpha_{2}^{(0)}\right]^2\) due to a factorization rule for the corresponding diagrammatic representation, see Appendix [6](#factorization){reference-type="ref" reference="factorization"}. In contrast to this, the second line in Eq. ([\[alpha1\]](#alpha1){reference-type="ref" reference="alpha1"}) reveals the break down of this factorization rule for non-vanishing driving. As the grand-canonical free energy allows to calculate the order parameter via \[\begin{aligned} \psi = \frac{1}{N_{s}}\frac{\partial F}{\partial j^{*}}\,, \quad \psi^* = \frac{1}{N_{s}}\frac{\partial F}{\partial j}\,, \label{psi} \end{aligned}\] it motivates the idea that it is possible to formally perform a Legendre transformation from the grand-canonical free energy \(F (j,j^* )\) to an effective potential \(\Gamma(\psi, \psi^*)\) that is useful in a quantitative Landau theory: \[\Gamma=F/N_{\rm s}-j\psi^{*}-j^{*}\psi\.\] Inserting ([\[ex\]](#ex){reference-type="ref" reference="ex"}) the effective potential can be written in a power series of the order parameter \[\Gamma=F_{0}/N_{s}-\frac{1}{c_{2}(t)}|\psi|^{2}+\frac{c_{4}(t)}{c_{2}(t)}|\psi|^{4}+\cdots \.\] From ([\[coeff\]](#coeff){reference-type="ref" reference="coeff"}) we get the first-order result \[\begin{aligned} \frac{1}{c_{2}(t)}&=&\frac{1}{\alpha_2^{(0)}} \left(1+\frac{\alpha_2^{(1)}}{\alpha_2^{(0)}} t\right) \,. \label{condL} \end{aligned}\] According to the Landau theory, the location of a second-order phase transition is exclusively determined by the vanishing of ([\[condL\]](#condL){reference-type="ref" reference="condL"}), which yields with ([\[alpha0\]](#alpha0){reference-type="ref" reference="alpha0"}) and ([\[alpha1\]](#alpha1){reference-type="ref" reference="alpha1"}): \[\begin{aligned} 1+ zt \left[ \frac{n}{f(n)-f(n-1)} + \frac{n+1}{f(n)-f(n+1)} \right]\nonumber \\ +\frac{n(n+1)2 z t \left[J_0 \left( \frac{A}{\hbar \omega}\right)-1\right]}{[f(n)-f(n-1)][f(n)-f(n+1)]} =0 \,. \label{epltresult} \end{aligned}\] Note that, in the special case of a vanishing driving, i.e. \(A=0\), the quantum phase boundary ([\[epltresult\]](#epltresult){reference-type="ref" reference="epltresult"}) reduces to the undriven mean-field result from Ref.  due to \(J_0(0)=1\). In order to estimate the validity of the first-order EPLT result ([\[epltresult\]](#epltresult){reference-type="ref" reference="epltresult"}), we will compare it in the next section with the result from the Gutzwiller mean-field theory. ## Gutzwiller Mean-Field Theory In this subsection we follow the standard Gutzwiller Mean-Field Theory (GMFT) from Refs.  and assume that the ground state of the system is written as a product of identical single-site wave functions in the basis of local Fock states \[\begin{aligned} | \psi \rangle = \prod_{i} \sum_{n_i=0}^\infty g_{n_i}|n_i \rangle_i \,. \end{aligned}\] By restricting each sum to the three states \(|n_i-1 \rangle_i\), \(|n_i \rangle_i\) and \(|n_i+1\rangle_i\) the ground-state energy per site results in \[\begin{aligned} E/N_{\rm s} &=&-zt\Bigg[\left(n+1\right) g_{n}^{2}g_{n+1}^{2}+2J_{0}\left(\frac{A}{\hbar \omega}\right)\sqrt{n\left(n+1\right)} \nonumber\\ & & \times g_{n}^{2} g_{n+1} g_{n+1}+n g_{n-1}^{2}g_{n}^{2}\Bigg]+f(n-1) g_{n-1}^{2}\nonumber \\ &&+f(n)g_{n}^{2}+f(n+1) g_{n+1}^{2} \,. \label{ground} \end{aligned}\] The yet unknown parameters \(g_{n-1},g_n,g_{n+1}\) are then determined from minimizing the ground-state energy ([\[ground\]](#ground){reference-type="ref" reference="ground"}) by taking into account the normalization condition \[\begin{aligned} g_{n-1}^2+g_n^2+g_{n+1}^2 = 1 \,. \end{aligned}\] Thus, the quantum phase boundary follows from the ansatz \(g_{n-1}= \delta g_{n-1}\), \(g_n=1+\delta g_n\), \(g_{n+1}=\delta g_{n+1}\) with infinitesimal but non-vanishing deviations \(\delta g_{n-1}\), \(\delta g_{n}\), \(\delta g_{n+1}\), yielding the condition \[\begin{aligned} 1+ zt \left[ \frac{n}{f(n)-f(n-1)} + \frac{n+1}{f(n)-f(n+1)} \right]\nonumber \\ +\frac{n(n+1)z^2 t^2\left[ 1-J_0^2 \left( \frac{A}{\hbar \omega}\right)\right]}{[f(n)-f(n-1)][f(n)-f(n+1)]} =0 \,. \label{gmftresult} \end{aligned}\] Similar to ([\[epltresult\]](#epltresult){reference-type="ref" reference="epltresult"}) also here the quantum phase boundary ([\[gmftresult\]](#gmftresult){reference-type="ref" reference="gmftresult"}) yields in the limit \(A \rightarrow 0\) the undriven mean-field result from Ref. . For a non-vanishing driving, however, we observe that the quantum phase boundary following from first-order EPLT in ([\[epltresult\]](#epltresult){reference-type="ref" reference="epltresult"}) and GMLT in ([\[gmftresult\]](#gmftresult){reference-type="ref" reference="gmftresult"}) differ. In Fig. [\[figure1\]](#figure1){reference-type="ref" reference="figure1"} we compare them for different driving amplitudes \(A\). We assume that the driving amplitude \(A\) is restricted according to \(0 < A/(\hbar\omega) < x_1\), where \(x_1\approx 2.4\) denotes the first zero of the Bessel function \(J_0(x)\), so that pair superfluidity does not occur. From the comparison in Fig. [\[figure1\]](#figure1){reference-type="ref" reference="figure1"} we read off that both results ([\[epltresult\]](#epltresult){reference-type="ref" reference="epltresult"}) and ([\[gmftresult\]](#gmftresult){reference-type="ref" reference="gmftresult"}) are almost identical provided that the driving parameter \(A/(\hbar\omega)\) is small enough. In fact, their phase boundaries reveal only small discrepancies for \(A/(\hbar\omega) < 1.5\), whereas qualitative different results occur for \(A/(\hbar\omega) > 1.5\). In the latter case GMFT yields a triangular lobe, while first-order EPLT predicts that the lobe shape remains round. In comparison with GMFT and the more accurate results from the next subsection we conclude that first-order EPLT reveals for larger driving an unphysical result insofar, as the quantum phase boundary turns out to be convex instead of concave for small hopping \(t\). Thus, the validity range of first-order EPLT is restricted up to the turning point when the convexity starts to appear. With this we obtain from ([\[epltresult\]](#epltresult){reference-type="ref" reference="epltresult"}) irrespective of the lobe number \(n\) the condition that the driving amplitude \(A\) is restricted according to \(0 < A/(\hbar\omega) < x_2\), where \(x_2\approx1.52\) represents the smallest solution of \(2 J_0(x)=1\). In the next subsection we show that this restriction for the validity range of first-order EPLT is lifted once the hopping order is increased. ## Higher Order and Numerical Results Now we strive after obtaining more accurate results for the quantum phase boundary. At first, we consider EPLT in second hopping order, where the condition for the MI-SF phase transition reads \[t =\frac{\tilde{\alpha}_{1}}{2\left(\tilde{\alpha}_{2}-\tilde{\alpha}_{1}^{2}\right)}+\frac{1}{2\left(\tilde{\alpha}_{2}-\tilde{\alpha}_{1}^{2}\right)} \sqrt{\tilde{\alpha}_{1}^{2}-4\left(\tilde{\alpha}_{2}-\tilde{\alpha}_{1}^{2}\right)}\. \label{ep2}\] Here the abbreviations \(\tilde{\alpha}_{1}=\alpha_{2}^{(1)}/\alpha_{2}^{(0)}\) and \(\tilde{\alpha}_{2}=\alpha_{2}^{(2)}/\alpha_{2}^{(0)}\) follow from ([\[alpha0\]](#alpha0){reference-type="ref" reference="alpha0"}), ([\[alpha1\]](#alpha1){reference-type="ref" reference="alpha1"}) as well as ([\[alpha2\]](#alpha2){reference-type="ref" reference="alpha2"})--([\[alpha22\]](#alpha22){reference-type="ref" reference="alpha22"}) in Appendix B. In order to check how accurate the second-order EPLT result is, we compare it quantitatively for a 2D square lattice with two other approaches. On the one hand we have applied the strong-coupling method of Ref.  up to third order, yielding for \(n=1\) a quantum phase boundary with the upper part \[\begin{aligned} \mu_1&=& 1-2z t-t^2 \left\{ 2 z^2 J_0^2 (x) + z \left[ \frac{3}{2}J_0^2 (2x)-6 J_0^2 (x) \right] \right\} \nonumber\\ &&-t^3 \left\{ 6 z^3 J_0^3 (x) + z^2 \left[6 J_0 (2x) J_0^2 (x)-24 J_0^2 (x)\phantom{\frac{3}{2}} \right. \right. \nonumber \\ &&\left. \left.-\frac{3}{2} J_0^2 (2x) \right] + z \left[18-6 J_0 (2x) \phantom{\frac{3}{2}} \hspace*{-2mm} \right] \right\} \label{strong1} \end{aligned}\] and the lower part \[\begin{aligned} \mu_2 &=& t z + t^2 J_0^2 (x) (2 z^2-6 z) \nonumber \\ &&+ t^3 J_0^2 (x) (6 z^3-18 z^2 + 12 z)\, , \label{strong2} \end{aligned}\] where we have introduced for brevity the dimensionless driving parameter \(x=A/(\hbar\omega)\) and the coordination number \(z=4\). Note that the second-order strong-coupling results ([\[strong1\]](#strong1){reference-type="ref" reference="strong1"}) and ([\[strong2\]](#strong2){reference-type="ref" reference="strong2"}) can also be recovered from second-order EPLT by solving the quantum phase boundary \(t=t(\mu)\) in ([\[ep2\]](#ep2){reference-type="ref" reference="ep2"}) for \(\mu=\mu(t)\) up to second hopping order. This agreement order by order in the hopping expansion is insofar surprising as the strong-coupling method yields reliable results for low dimensions, whereas EPLT has shown to be most accurate for high dimensions. In addition we have obtained high-precision QMC results from developing an algorithm on the basis of a stochastic series expansion. In order to get the high accuracy quantum phase diagram in the thermodynamic limit from QMC, we performed a finite-size scaling with the lattice sizes \(N=8\times8\), \(10\times10\), and \(12\times12\) at the temperature \(T=U/(20N)\). From Fig. [\[figure2\]](#figure2){reference-type="ref" reference="figure2"}, we observe that the second-order EPLT result deviates not more than \(6\%\) error from the QMC result in the considered range \(0 < A/(\hbar\omega) < x_1 \approx 2.4\) of driving amplitudes. Thus, our second-order EPLT result is sufficiently accurate for studying quantitatively the effect of the periodic driving upon the quantum phase transition. Furthermore, we also read off from Fig. [\[figure2\]](#figure2){reference-type="ref" reference="figure2"} that the QMC result lies between the third-order strong-coupling result and the second-order EPLT result. This suggests to evaluate both analytical methods to even higher hopping orders, for instance, by applying the process-chain approach. The true quantum phase boundary should then lie between the upper boundary provided by the strong-coupling method and the lower boundary from the EPLT method. This hypothesis cannot directly be tested for a 3D lattice system as it is quite hard to get a satisfying quantum phase diagram from QMC. However, as EPLT is more accurate for higher-dimensional systems, it is suggestive that the error will even be smaller for a 3D cubic lattice. Now we use our second-order EPLT result in order to analyze the critical points of the Mott lobes in more detail. Figure [\[figure3\]](#figure3){reference-type="ref" reference="figure3"} shows the EPLT predictions for the relative critical hopping \(\Delta t_c=t_{c}(A)/t_{c}(A=0)\) and the relative critical chemical potential \(\Delta \mu_c=\left[\mu_{c}(A)-(n-1)U\right]/\) \(\left[\mu_{c}(A=0)-(n-1)U\right]\) at the tip of different Mott lobes as a function of the driving amplitude \(A\). From Fig. [\[figure3\]](#figure3){reference-type="ref" reference="figure3"} a) we read off at first that a larger driving leads to an increase of the Mott lobe. Thus, similar to the shaken optical lattice, the periodic modulation of the s-wave scattering length provides a control knob to tune the quantum phase transition from Mott insulator to superfluid. Furthermore, it turns out that the effect of periodic driving upon the critical hopping at the lobe tip is slightly larger in \(3\)D than in \(2\)D systems, i.e. the driving effect is sensitive to the coordination number \(z\). This can be intuitively understood from the hopping term in the effective Hamiltonian ([\[heff\]](#heff){reference-type="ref" reference="heff"}), which contains the Bessel function \(J_0\) with the nearest neighbor particle difference as its argument. Generally speaking, higher-order hopping processes have a larger driving effect as they have a larger probability to involve a larger nearest neighbor particle difference, and there are more possible higher order hopping processes in higher dimensional systems. In addition, we find from Fig. [\[figure3\]](#figure3){reference-type="ref" reference="figure3"} a) that the driving effect is quite small with respect to the filling number \(n\) as all Mott lobes in both \(2\)D and \(3\)D lattices increase almost in the same way for a fixed driving amplitude. Also this observation is explained by the fact that the effective Hamiltonian ([\[heff\]](#heff){reference-type="ref" reference="heff"}) depends on the nearest neighbor particle number difference rather than on the respective particle number on each site. We can also analyze the driving effect upon the critical chemical potential, which is depicted in Fig. [\[figure3\]](#figure3){reference-type="ref" reference="figure3"} b). At first glance we observe that the critical chemical potential behaves differently in a \(2\)D square and a \(3\)D cubic lattice. It decreases monotonously in \(3\)D with increasing driving amplitude, but in 2D it reveals a nonmonotonous behavior and increases initially before it also finally decreases. Furthermore, we read off that the critical chemical potential changes only slightly with the driving amplitude \(A\) and the filling number \(n\). Up to the driving \(A/(\hbar\omega)=1\) the critical potential changes less than one per cent, whereas for a huge filling number \(n=100\) it almost does not change at all. # Effective Bose-Hubbard Model {#section4} In the previous section we have found that the critical hopping is uniformly renormalized according to Fig. [\[figure3\]](#figure3){reference-type="ref" reference="figure3"} a) irrespective of the Mott lobe number \(n\), whereas the critical chemical nearly does not change according to Fig. [\[figure3\]](#figure3){reference-type="ref" reference="figure3"} b). This motivates to investigate in this section whether the whole quantum phase boundary for the effective Hamiltonian ([\[heff\]](#heff){reference-type="ref" reference="heff"}) stems approximately from the usual Bose-Hubbard Hamiltonian \[\hat{H}=-t\lambda(x)\sum_{<ij>}\hat{a}_{i}^{\dag}\hat{a}_{j}+\sum_{i}\frac{U}{2}\hat{n}_{i}(\hat{n}_{i}-1)-\sum_{i}\mu \hat{n}_{i}\. \label{neff}\] Here \(\lambda (x)\) denotes a suitable rescaling of the hopping with the dimensionless driving parameter \(x=A/(\hbar \omega)\) such that all Mott lobes coincide approximately. From Fig. [\[figure3\]](#figure3){reference-type="ref" reference="figure3"} a), we determine via a Taylor expansion for \(n=1\) the fit function \[\lambda (x)=1+ax+bx^{2}+cx^{3}+dx^{4}+\ldots \,, \label{fit}\] with \(a=-0.0045\), \(b=0.1356\), \(c=0.0366\), \(d=0.0129\) for a \(3\)D cubic lattice, while we have \(a=-0.0018\), \(b=0.1212\), \(c=0.0561\), \(d=0.0178\) for a \(2\)D square lattice. Figure [\[figure4\]](#figure4){reference-type="ref" reference="figure4"} compares the resulting quantum phase diagram for the new effective model ([\[neff\]](#neff){reference-type="ref" reference="neff"}) with the original effective model ([\[heff\]](#heff){reference-type="ref" reference="heff"}). We read off that not only the critical point but also the complete quantum phase diagram is perfectly reproduced by the Bose-Hubbard model ([\[neff\]](#neff){reference-type="ref" reference="neff"}) with the fit function ([\[fit\]](#fit){reference-type="ref" reference="fit"}) in a \(3\)D cubic lattice. The same can also be observed in a \(2\)D square lattice provided the driving amplitude is not too large. Furthermore, we have also used QMC simulations in order to investigate whether both models ([\[heff\]](#heff){reference-type="ref" reference="heff"}) and ([\[neff\]](#neff){reference-type="ref" reference="neff"}) also have the same properties in the superfluid phase. To this end we have calculated both the superfluid density \(\rho_s=\langle W^2/2\beta t\rangle\) in terms of the winding number \(W\) following Ref.  and the difference between the total density and the density in Mott-I, i.e. \(\Delta\rho=\mathop{\sum}_i \langle n_i\rangle/N-1\), as a function of the chemical potential. Figure [\[figure5\]](#figure5){reference-type="ref" reference="figure5"} compares both quantities for the models ([\[heff\]](#heff){reference-type="ref" reference="heff"}) and ([\[neff\]](#neff){reference-type="ref" reference="neff"}). We read off that they perfectly agree near the quantum phase boundary, but farther away they slightly differ due to larger density fluctuations. # conclusion We have applied the Floquet theory in order to analyze the effect of a periodic modulation of the s-wave scattering length upon the quantum phase diagram of bosons in an optical lattice. At first we have obtained a time-independent effective Hamiltonian for large enough driving frequencies. Then we used GMFT, EPLT, strong-coupling method, and QMC simulations in order to determine quantitatively how the different Mott lobes change with the driving amplitude. In particular, we have found that the time-independent effective model can be well described even by the usual Bose-Hubbard model provided that the hopping is rescaled appropriately with the driving amplitude. Thus, a period driving of the *interaction* allows to tune dynamically the *hopping* within an optical lattice. Furthermore, these findings corroborate the hypothesis that the Bose-Hubbard model with a periodically driven s-wave scattering length and the usual Bose-Hubbard model belong to the same universality class from the point of view of critical phenomena and, thus, should have the same critical exponents . :::

{'timestamp': '2014-01-24T02:05:39', 'yymm': '1401', 'arxiv_id': '1401.5907', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5907'}

# Introduction Main Belt comets are a newly recognized group of objects originating in the main asteroid belt that show sporadic comet-like appearance. An already well-known textbook example of the Main Belt comets is the object 133P/(7968) Elst-Pizarro. It was reported for the first time in 1979 as a minor planet, being completely stellar in appearance. In 1996 Eric Elst and Guido Pizarro found its cometary aspect when the object was near perihelion. Subsequently, the cometary-like activity appeared again around the perihelion at the end of 2001. Because of the persistent appearance of the comet-like characteristics, the object was classified as a comet and today it is one of just a few objects that have a dual status, that is they have both minor planet and comet designations. Since the discovery of comet-like activity on 133P/(7968) Elst-Pizarro, just a handful of similar Main Belt objects have been found. proposed possible mechanisms for producing mass loss from asteroids, but the cause of the activity of all known Main Belt comets is still unknown and the cometary nature of these objects is still under debate. Statistically, there are indications that there are many more Main Belt comets than the known ones. Based on the discovery of one active object among 599 observed ones, now known as 176P/LINEAR, has suggested that there could exist \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}100 currently active Main Belt comets among low inclination, kilometer-scale outer belt objects. A promising statistical indication of many more Main Belt comets are estimations of impact rates in the Main Belt. The recent outbursts on P/2010 A2 (LINEAR) and (596) Scheila have proven that impacts can also be causes for the comet-like appearance of Main Belt asteroids. For example, the impactor size of P/2010 A2 (LINEAR) is estimated to a body of diameter 6-9 m. The roughly estimated impact rate of impacts of this size is every 1.1 billion years for a parent body of diameter 120 m, which corresponds to one impact every \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}12 years somewhere in the asteroid belt. By reducing the impactor sizes the impact rate increases and it is not yet known what effects can cause much smaller impactors in the range of \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}0.1-1 m, which probably are not negligible. All the Main Belt asteroids that were classified as comets showed a diffuse, instead of a star-like, visual appearance. Hunting for comet-like Main Belt objects by searching for typical cometary features, like tails or comae, requires a lot of telescope time in middle and large class telescopes and does not guarantee success in detecting them all. Although a search for new Main Belt comet candidates performed by, searching in the Thousand Asteroid Light Curve Survey (TALCS) images, resulted in no new candidates, evidence was found that \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}5\(\%\) of Main Belt asteroids might be active at low levels, in form of a faint tail which cannot be detected individually, but collectively in the TALCS data set. A mechanism of mass loss that might offer an explanation of weak activities on small bodies is seismic shaking induced by the release of energy by the liberation of internal stresses, the reaccommodation of material, or thermal cracking. Small impacts might generate shock waves that can propagate to the body interior and globally shake the object. Simulations of surface shaking in low-gravity environments like those of small solar system bodies have shown that particles can be ejected from the surface at very low relative velocities. Periodic recurrence of the activity on some objects can be explained by meteoroid streams in the Main Belt, causing many of small impacts and triggering some of the mass-loss mechanisms. A mass-loss mechanism possibly related to asteroid collisions is rotational instability. In addition, the Yarkovsky--O'Keefe--Radzievskii--Paddack (YORP) effect tends to modify the objects' spin rates. Close encounters with planets or large asteroids can also affect the objects' spin rates. Reaching the critical rotation frequency by increasing the spin rates can lead to the deformation and rotational fission of objects, or just to the ejection of dust grains from the objects' surface. It is difficult to guess how much material is produced by the suggested mass-loss mechanisms, but we believe that there must exist objects with some weak type of cometary activity, producing only a thin coma which is barely detectable by the visual examination of images. For example, this could include activity triggered by small impactors or be caused by electrostatic levitation. In this paper we present a search for objects that indicate some type of weak activity, in form of deviations from their expected brightness. With a view to examining as many objects as possible, our search for new comet-like Main Belt objects is based on the data available in the MPCAT-OBS Observation Archive. Even though the photometric accuracy of the MPCAT-OBS Observation Archive is poor, it still has some potential, especially for large objects that become relatively bright near their opposition points, ensuring high signal-to-noise ratios and good photometric accuracy using today's sensitive instruments. # Methods and materials The main idea was to compare every object's observed brightness with its expected brightness. With the goal to have as many observations per object as possible over a minimum of three oppositions, we decided to use the MPCAT-OBS Observation Archive covering only numbered objects. The database used from October 2011 contains \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}75 million observations, covering \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}300 000 numbered objects. To avoid the overlapping of measurements collected through various photometric bands, it was important to choose observations collected by using just one photometric band. Because a lot of sky surveys observed in the visual (V) photometric band, and for them we can expect that their data are relatively precise, but also because of tests that showed that the observations collected in the V band are in good agreement with the Minor Planet Center or JPL Solar System Dynamics database estimated magnitudes, it was decided to use observations collected in the V photometric band. The computations of expected brightnesses for every observation from the MPCAT-OBS Observation Archive are based on the H-G magnitude system, and were calculated by using the Astronomical Ephemeris library PyEphem for Python. The orbital and physical parameters of the objects, which were necessary to compute the expected brightnesses, were taken from the Minor Planet Center Orbit Database (MPCORB), version prepared on October 28, 2011. Additionally, a few examples of the computed brightnesses have been compared to the computations using JPL HORIZONS, to verify they show good correspondence. To visualize the brightness deviations between the expected and observed brightness, the data was shown in a dMAG versus MAG plot (Fig. [\[fig1\]](#fig1){reference-type="ref" reference="fig1"}), where MAG (x-axis) indicates the observed brightness and dMAG (y-axis) the difference between the observed and expected brightness, defined as in Eq. 1. The plot includes about 24 million brightness measurements in the V photometric band from all \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}300 000 objects contained in the MPCAT-OBS Observation Archive. \[dMAG = observed\,brightness-expected\,brightness \eqno(1)\] To filter out the objects we were interested in, we considered only measurements of objects with negative brightness deviations (brightness increasing) greater than 3-sigma for a minimum of five measurements per object. The sigma values were calculated in one magnitude steps for all V measurements from magnitude 8.0 to 23.0. Through the calculated sigma values a second-order polynomial trend-line was fitted. In Fig. [\[fig1\]](#fig1){reference-type="ref" reference="fig1"} trend-lines for the 1-sigma, 2-sigma, and 3-sigma limits are shown. The 3-sigma condition that we used to filter the data is defined as \[dMAG < 0.0082 \cdot MAG ^{2}-0.2381 \cdot MAG + 0.3549. \eqno(2)\] In this way, \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}1700 object designations were extracted. For each of the \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}1700 extracted objects, we generated plots like those shown in Figs. [\[fig8\]](#fig8){reference-type="ref" reference="fig8"}-[\[fig3\]](#fig3){reference-type="ref" reference="fig3"}, and [\[fig4\]](#fig4){reference-type="ref" reference="fig4"}-[\[fig7\]](#fig7){reference-type="ref" reference="fig7"}. The upper plots show the brightness deviations (y-axis) versus time given in Julian Date (x-axis). The measurements, shown in various markers for observations collected by different observatories (labelled with observatory codes assigned by the Minor Planet Center), are bunched into small groups that correspond to observations collected in different oppositions. The lower plots show the brightness deviations (y-axis) versus heliocentric distance given in astronomical units (x-axis). The heliocentric distance for every observation was also computed in Python, by using the Astronomical Ephemeris library PyEphem. The object candidates showing unusual brightness deviations were extracted by visual examination of the plots. # Results and Discussion The main principle of the visual examination of the plots was to search for objects that show brightness deviations at least over a few nights. Large brightness deviations that include just a few measurements over one night, reported by just one Observatory code, are mostly produced by close encounters of objects with bright stars and their blooming spikes in the images. In this way, we extracted six objects which show unusual long-term brightness deviations, lasting within their whole oppositions, and changing their intensity with time. Some of the objects show a possible correlation of their brightness deviation versus heliocentric distance, while some of them do not. One of the extracted objects was the already known Main Belt comet 133P/(7968) Elst-Pizarro, while five of them were objects without previously observed signs of cometary activity. The maximum observed apparent magnitudes of the candidates ranges between 13.9 mag and 16.7 mag, presuming good photometric accuracy, at least for observations collected near the opposition points. Almost all of the brightness deviations were detected by multiple observatories at the same time, confirming the reliability of the deviations. To demonstrate data plots of objects that do not indicate any activity in the form of brightness deviations, we have randomly chosen (306) Unitas (Fig. [\[fig8\]](#fig8){reference-type="ref" reference="fig8"}) and (10059) 1988 FS2 (Fig. [\[fig9\]](#fig9){reference-type="ref" reference="fig9"}) from the 1700 extracted objects by using our filtering requirements. We note here that in case of an inaccurate estimation of the objects' absolute magnitudes, the brightness deviations would have a constant offset for any time, as high as the aberration of the real absolute magnitude, but would not imply any activity. The new object candidates and their basic orbital elements are listed in Table [1](#tb1){reference-type="ref" reference="tb1"}. The data plots of 133P/(7968) Elst-Pizarro in Fig. [\[fig2\]](#fig2){reference-type="ref" reference="fig2"}, containing 169 observations in the V photometric band, show maximum brightness deviations of \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}2 magnitudes during its opposition in 1996 (upper plot). The lower plot demonstrates that the largest brightness deviations appear near the object's perihelion, on heliocentric distances between 2.6 and 2.8 AU, which has been suggested as an indication of activity caused by thermal processes such as sublimation of ice. The example of 133P/(7968) Elst-Pizarro demonstrates that the cometary appearance of objects can be detected photometrically by calculating deviations from their expected brightnesses. Thus, the method has potential to be applied in the future sky survey programmes. Projects like the Large Synoptic Sky Telescope (LSST) and the Panoramic Survey Telescope & Rapid Response System (Pan-STARRS) could implement an alert system in their observing programmes, notifying when there are objects with deviations from their expected brightnesses. Unfortunately, the Gaia spacecraft (Global Astrometric Interferometer for Astrophysics) will not observe for many oppositions, but the database generated during the mission will still be suitable to search for photometric outbursts. In the following sections, a short overview for each of the five candidates is given, with ideas about possible causes of the brightness deviations. ## (315) Constantia The asteroid (315) Constantia is a small object belonging to the Flora family in the inner Main Belt. It was discovered by Johann Palisa on September 4, 1891 in Vienna. According to the JPL Small-Body Database, its absolute magnitude is H = 13.2, which corresponds to an estimated diameter of 5-12 km. The upper plot in Fig. [\[fig3\]](#fig3){reference-type="ref" reference="fig3"} shows long-term brightness deviations lasting several oppositions and reaching their maximum approximately in June 2005 (JD \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}2453520), showing average deviations roughly estimated at 1 magnitude. The points within individual oppositions are spread over \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}0.5 magnitudes, which allows us to roughly estimate the object's lightcurve amplitude. Constantia rotates with a synodic period of 5.345\(\pm\)`<!-- -->`{=html}0.003 h showing a lightcurve amplitude of 0.57\(\pm\)`<!-- -->`{=html}0.2 mag, which is in good agreement with our estimation. The plot shows a short brightness increase on December 05, 2003 (JD \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}2452979), containing only four measurements collected by the Catalina Sky Survey at the Steward Observatory (observatory code 703). Most probably it was caused by some artefacts in the images produced due to a \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}7 mag. bright star \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}35 arcmin from the object. The lower plot in Fig. [\[fig3\]](#fig3){reference-type="ref" reference="fig3"} shows no correlation between the object's heliocentric distance and its brightness deviations. This excludes thermal processes and sublimation as an explanation for its activity. If the brightness increase is caused by a physical mechanism, a possible interpretation might be connected to some long-lasting processes, for example electrostatic ejection of sub-micron grains. The ejection of particles large enough to scatter optical photons (\>0.1 \(\mu\)m) by the electrostatic forces is possible for asteroids up to about 10-20 km. Assuming that the grains and the asteroids are spherical, the criterion for the critical grain size for electrostatic ejection is \[a = \left(18 \epsilon_{0} V E l \over 4 \pi G \rho^{2} r^{2}\right) ^{1/2}, \eqno(3)\] where \(\epsilon_{0}\) = 8.854 \(\times\) 10\(^{-12}\) F m\(^{-1}\) is the permittivity of free space; \(V\) is the potential of the grains; \(E\) is the local electric field gradient; \(l\) is the shielding distance that effectively neutralizes the gradient; \(G\) is the gravitational constant; \(\rho\) is the density, assuming that the density for the object and its grains are the same, using for both 2000 kg m\(^{-3}\); and \(r\) represents the object's diameter. If we assume an albedo of \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}0.14 for (315) Constantia, which is a typical value for the Flora family S-type asteroids, it leads to (315) Constantia's diameter of \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}8 km. The model of electrostatic ejection on small bodies, gives a critical grain size of 0.27-0.86 \(\mu\)m for a \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}8 km body and by substituting lunar values, \(V\) = 10 V, \(E\) \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}10 to 100 V m\(^{-1}\), and \(l\) = 1 m. The Flora family is believed to originate from the catastrophic disruption of an asteroid or binary asteroid pair. A study of the dynamical dispersion of the proper eccentricity and inclination suggests that the Flora family dynamically disperses on a time scale of few 10\(^{8}\) years and that its age may be significantly less than 10\(^{9}\) years. Additionally, estimates of the cratering age of (951) Gaspra's surface, which also belongs to the Flora family, suggests that the family's age is 20 to 300 million years. The fact that (315) Constantia belongs to the relatively recently created Flora family does not exclude the possibility that the activity is triggered by some other processes on its young surface, such as space weathering, which can occur on asteroid surfaces as shown by the results of the Galileo spacecraft. Another possible cause for the apparent brightness increase, not connected to any physical mechanism, may be inaccurate estimations of the predicted brightnesses. The H-G magnitude system predicts the magnitude of an object as a function of phase angle, but does not take into account the aspect angle. In order to correct the variations with regard to the aspect angle (i.e. the angle between the object's rotation axis and the observer), it is required to know the object's pole orientation. In order to examine the object's brightnesses depending on the aspect angle \(A\), we consider a three-axial ellipsoid model (asteroid) with axis \(a>b>c\). The asteroid's maximum (\(S_{max}\)) and minimum (\(S_{min}\)) projected areas as seen by a distant observer, as a function of the aspect angle, are given by: \[S_{max} = \pi a b c \left({sin^{2}(A) \over b^{2}} + {cos^{2}(A) \over c^{2}} \right)^{1/2} \eqno(4)\] \[S_{min} = \pi a b c \left({sin^{2}(A) \over a^{2}} + {cos^{2}(A) \over c^{2}} \right)^{1/2}. \eqno(5)\] Assuming that the projected area is proportional to the observed brightness of the asteroid, the projected area can be transformed into apparent magnitudes by \(mag =-2.5 \log{S}\). By assuming an elongated three-axial ellipsoid with an axis ratio of 1:0.5:0.25, the maximum variation in brightness due to different aspect angles (maximum difference between the maximum brightness at aspect angle 0\(^{\circ}\) and the minimum brightness at aspect angle 90\(^{\circ}\)) would be of the order of \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}1.5 mag (Fig. [\[fig4xx\]](#fig4xx){reference-type="ref" reference="fig4xx"}). Therefore, owing to variation in aspect angles we would expect a maximum deviation of \(1.5/2 = 0.75\) magnitudes with respect to the mean. This is smaller than the typical threshold for brightness increases that we use, which is more than \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}1 magnitude. However, assuming that the used absolute magnitudes provided by the MPCORB are inaccurate and by accomplishing some corrections, the aspect angle variations could offer an explanation for the brightness deviations. In addition, the object was observed from San Pedro de Atacama (observatory code I16) during two nights from January 12-14, 2013 using a 0.41 m f/3.7 telescope with a 4008 x 2672 pixel CCD camera. In total 41 images were collected, using exposure times of 240 seconds and 300 seconds in clear filter. By a visual examination of the images, no cometary features of (315) Constantia were detected. Its point spread function does not differ from stars of similar brightnesses and the measured brightness showed no deviations from the object's predicted brightness. The object's heliocentric distance at the time our observations were collected was \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}2.148 AU. By looking up the given heliocentric distance in the lower plot of Fig. [\[fig3\]](#fig3){reference-type="ref" reference="fig3"}, it is easy to notice that in this region brightness deviations have never been observed. Therefore, it is not surprising that the object showed no brightness deviations, but the cause of this behaviour is still speculative. ## (1026) Ingrid The asteroid (1026) Ingrid was discovered by Karl Wilhelm Reinmuth on August 13, 1923 in Heidelberg. It is interesting that (1026) Ingrid also belongs to the Flora family, like the MBC candidate (315) Constantia, and like C/2010 A2. If we assume a typical albedo value for the Flora family members of \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}0.14, (1026) Ingrid's diameter is estimated at \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}13.5 km. The upper plot in Fig. [\[fig4\]](#fig4){reference-type="ref" reference="fig4"} shows long-term brightness deviations showing two maxima. The first maximum occurred during the oppositions in March 2000 and October 2001, showing average deviations of nearly one magnitude. The second maximum occurred during the opposition in November 2008, with maximum deviations of \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}1.5 magnitudes, but in this case we think that the absolute magnitude was probably estimated to be too high. A value set for \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}0.5 magnitudes lower would be more likely. In this case our brightness deviations would lower by the same amount. (1026) Ingrid's rotational period of 5.3\(\pm\)`<!-- -->`{=html}0.3 hours was determined by, showing an amplitude of \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}0.5 mag, which is in good agreement with the brightness deviations of observations within individual oppositions, visible in the upper plot. The lower plot in Fig. [\[fig4\]](#fig4){reference-type="ref" reference="fig4"} shows that the long-term brightness deviations are independent of the object's heliocentric distance. The origin of the deviations remains unexplained. If we consider electrostatic ejection of dust particles from the body's surface as a potential mechanism, the critical grain size for (1026) Ingrid, calculated by Eq. 3, would be 0.16-0.51 \(\mu\)m, which is still large enough to scatter optical photons. The object was observed during three nights between January 14 and January 16, 2013, at the heliocentric distance of \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}2.645 AU, which is very near its aphelion. Using the same equipment at San Pedro de Atacama, as was used to acquire the observations of (315) Constantia, we obtained 43 images in total, using exposure times of 300 seconds, but the object does not show any unusual activity in the visual appearance, nor in its brightness. ## (3646) Aduatiques The asteroid (3646) Aduatiques is a 7-15 km sized Main Belt object discovered on September 11, 1985 by Henri Debehogne at La Silla. The upper plot in Fig. [\[fig5\]](#fig5){reference-type="ref" reference="fig5"} shows long-term brightness deviations in a range roughly estimated at one magnitude. The lower plot in Fig. [\[fig5\]](#fig5){reference-type="ref" reference="fig5"} shows the correlation between the brightness deviations and the object's heliocentric distance. The data between \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}2.45 AU and \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}2.85 AU shows a possible correlation with the heliocentric distance, but the increasing deviations at \>2.85 AU are inconsistent with this statement. To check if the object displays cometary features like comae or tails, so far we have requested eight images from Catalina Sky Survey's Mt. Lemmon Survey (observatory code G96) which were taken at the moment of the largest deviations. The requested images containing (3646) Aduatiques are listed in Table [2](#tb2){reference-type="ref" reference="tb2"}. The images were obtained in Mt. Lemmon's regular sky survey programme, using their 1.5 m f/2.0 Cassegrain reflector. The images were exposed 30 (images taken in 2008) and 40 seconds (images taken in 2011), which, for the observed object, contributed to a signal-to-noise ratio of around 60. By visual examination of the images, no typical indications of cometary activity was found, besides the negative deviation in (3646) Aduatiques' brightness. To re-analyse the object's brightness, the images were remeasured using a Windows version of SExtractor and compared to the expected brightness (Table [2](#tb2){reference-type="ref" reference="tb2"}) generated by the JPL Solar System Dynamics database. At the moment, it is difficult to guess what mechanisms cause the large variations in (3646) Aduatiques, and future observations and a rotational lightcurve will be required. The upper plot allows us to estimate the object's lightcurve amplitude of \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}0.6 magnitudes. ## (24684) 1990 EU4 The asteroid (24684) 1990 EU4 is a \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}3-6 km Main Belt object, discovered by Eric Walter Elst on March 02, 1990 from La Silla. The plots in Fig. [\[fig6\]](#fig6){reference-type="ref" reference="fig6"} show long-term brightness deviations of nearly one magnitude. The object's rotational lightcurve is still unknown, but according to the upper plot in Fig. [\[fig6\]](#fig6){reference-type="ref" reference="fig6"}, we think that it may have an amplitude of \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}0.5 magnitudes because this is the typical scatter in single oppositions. The brightness increase visible in the upper plot reaching brightness deviations of \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}3 magnitudes was observed on March 13, 2007 (JD  2457825), by the Catalina Sky Survey (observatory code 703) and was most probably caused by artefacts in the images produced by bright stars in the object's surrounding. The lower plot in Fig. [\[fig6\]](#fig6){reference-type="ref" reference="fig6"} shows no correlation of the brightness deviations versus heliocentric distance, which could indicate mechanisms similar to those causing deviations on (315) Constantia and (1026) Ingrid. ## (35101) 1991 PL16 The asteroid (35101) 1991 PL16 was discovered at the Palomar Observatory on August 07, 1991, by Henry E. Holt. The 5-12 km sized object belongs to the Eunomia family, and was possibly formed from the fragmentation of a partially differentiated S-type parent body. The Eunomia family's age is suggested to be similar to the Flora family's age. The upper plot in Fig. [\[fig7\]](#fig7){reference-type="ref" reference="fig7"} shows long-term average deviations of maximum one magnitude. The object's rotational period is still unknown, but according to the deviations in individual oppositions, we expect its amplitude to be slightly above \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}0.5 magnitudes. The lower plot shows a possible correlation of its brightness deviations versus the heliocentric distance, which could indicate a thermal process such as sublimation of ice. One more mass-loss mechanism that may be responsible for the activity is rotational instability. offered a model to estimate the objects' critical rotational period \(P_{c}\), that depends on its shape and density, given by \[P_{c} = k \left[3 \pi \over G \rho\right] ^{1/2}, \eqno(4)\] where \(k\) is the axial ratio of the body, given as \(k = a/b\), if axis a \(\geqslant\) b; \(G\) is the gravitational constant; and \(\rho\) is the density for the object. Assuming that the bulk density of all Eunomia family members is similar to their parent body's density, and using a lower estimations for (15) Eunomia's density of 960 \(\pm\) 300 kg m\(^{-3}\), assuming a prolate body with \(k\) = 2, Eq. 4 gives a value for the critical rotational period of \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}6.74 h. Therefore, if the rotational period of (35101) 1991 PL16 is shorter than 6.74 h, rotational instability might be a possible explanation for the object's activity. For comparison, the average bulk density of S-type asteroids is 2720 \(\pm\) 90 kg m\(^{-3}\). By choosing axial ratios \(k\) between 1 and 2, the estimated critical rotational period is between \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}2 and \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}4 hours. This excludes rotational instability as a source mechanism for the activity of our candidates (315) Constantia and (1026) Ingrid, because their rotational periods are greater than 4 hours. # Conclusions Our photometric search for active Main Belt objects was carried out just by using the MPCAT-OBS Observation Archive. From \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}75 million observations in total, covering \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}300 000 numbered objects, we extracted five new candidates of photometrically active Main Belt objects and the already known Main Belt comet 133P/(7968) Elst-Pizarro. The detection of 133P/(7968) Elst-Pizarro encourages us that our method can give positive results in searching for objects with signs of activity. Other already known Main Belt comets have not been detected using our method because they are still unnumbered, and are therefore not included in the used MPCAT-OBS data set, or their number of observations was still too low to fulfil our filtering requirements. Consequently, this means that the detected candidates cannot be used to make estimations of the statistical evidence of the quantity of similar objects in the Main Belt. We believe that the possible activities on our candidates have remained unnoticed until now because they have been evident only in the objects' brightness deviations, instead of showing typical cometary signs like comae or tails. An examination of images of (3646) Aduatiques, provided by the Mt. Lemmon Survey, shows no visible tail or coma at the moment of the largest deviations, but has proven the brightness deviations. The objects (315) Constantia, (1026) Ingrid, (3646) Aduatiques, and (24684) 1990 EU4 show brightness deviations independent of their heliocentric distances. For these objects, electrostatic ejection of dust grains or space weathering processes could offer possible explanations for the activities. Until now, there have been no clear examples of objects whose activities are caused by these processes. On the other hand, we cannot exclude that some brightness deviations are caused by some other, non-physical mechanism. By modelling the objects' brightnesses depending on the aspect angle, we have shown that for highly elongated objects deviations of \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}0.75 magnitudes are likely, and could offer possible explanations of the observed brightness deviations. An interesting fact is that three of our new candidates belong to relatively similar Main Belt families-(315) Constantia and (1026) Ingrid to the Flora family, and (35101) 1991 PL16 to the Eunomia family. Because of their young surface materials, this might be one of the main connections to the possible activities. By assuming an average value for the objects' bulk densities, rotational instability as a mass-loss mechanism on (315) Constantia and (1026) Ingrid can be excluded. The object (35101) 1991 PL16 shows brightness deviations dependent on its heliocentric distance, which could indicate a thermal process responsible for the activity. An additional possible explanation for weak activities on small bodies is seismic shaking, induced by the release of energy by the liberation of internal stresses, thermal cracking, or small impacts. One of the disadvantages of our method is the relatively low accuracy of photometric data contained in the MPCAT-OBS Observation Archive, which is a result of many different instrumental set-ups, but the method could be successfully implemented in future sky surveys that assure frequent imaging of the same objects with good photometric accuracy. These very simple alert systems could enable us to detect outbursts on Main Belt objects almost simultaneously with their occurrence, which is potentially interesting when searching for impact events in the Main Belt. The method can be used to reveal objects with outbursts, but also objects with peculiar photometric behaviour, signifying very elongated objects or binary objects that possess large rotational lightcurve amplitudes, which can be interesting side products of the search. Hence, further observations of the object candidates should be made in the future to determine whether these objects are really active, and if so, to investigate the cause of the activity.

{'timestamp': '2014-01-23T02:02:38', 'yymm': '1401', 'arxiv_id': '1401.5527', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5527'}

# Introduction Glitches, sudden jumps in the rotation frequency of neutron stars, are the unique events that provide invaluable information on the internal structure of extremely compact stars. Originally detected from rotation powered neutron stars, glitches are generically not associated to changes in the radiative behavior of the source. . Therefore, the proposed glitch models involve dynamical variations in the neutron star interior instead of an external torque mechanism. The size of the glitch typically reflects the underlying internal dynamics of the neutron star: small-size glitches (\(\Delta{\nu}\)/\(\nu\[\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}10\(^{-9}\), aka. Crab\(-\)like glitches) are explained by the decrease of the moment of inertia of the pulsar and large-size glitches (\(\Delta{\nu}\)/\(\nu\]\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}10\(^{-6}\), aka. Vela\(-\)like glitches) are described as the angular momentum transfer from inner crust neutron superfluid to the crust by the sudden unpinning of the vortices that are pinned to the inner crust nuclei . Anomalous X-ray Pulsars (AXPs) are slowly rotating (P \(\sim\) 2\(-\)`<!-- -->`{=html}12 s) neutron stars with persistent emission being significantly in excess of their inferred rotational energy loss rate. So far, there has been no evidence of binary signature in AXPs. They are young systems (\(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}10\(^4\) yr) as inferred from their characteristic spin-down ages (P/2\(\dot{P}\)), and also supported by their location on the plane of Milky Way, and the association of at least five AXPs with their supernova remnants. Almost all AXPs emitted short duration, energetic bursts in X-rays (see, e.g., @gavriil02 [@kaspi03] and for a recent review @reaesposito11). Their surface dipole magnetic field strengths inferred from their periods and spin-down rates are on the order of 10\(^{14}\) \(-\) 10\(^{15}\) G, which is much higher than that of conventional magnetic field strengths of pulsars. The decay of their extremely strong magnetic fields is proposed as the source of energy for their persistent X-ray emission and burst activity . Recently, observational evidence of dipole field decay was reported by. Glitch activity from an AXP was first seen in 1RXS J170849.0-400910 . Thanks to almost continuous spin monitoring of AXPs with *RXTE* for more than a decade, sudden spin frequency jumps have now been observed from six AXPs [see, e.g., @kaspi03; @dosso03; @woods04; @morii05; @israel07a; @israel07b; @dib08; @dib09; @gavriil11]. Fractional glitch amplitudes (\(\Delta{\nu}\)/\(\nu\)) of these events range from 10\(^{-8}\) to 10\(^{-5}\) and fractional postglitch change in spin-down rates (\(\Delta{\dot{\nu}}\)/\(\dot{\nu}\)) are between \(-\)`<!-- -->`{=html}0.1 and 1. Glitches from AXPs somehow resemble those from radio pulsars, but contain some peculiar distinctive features in their recovery behavior and associated radiative characteristics. AXP 1E 2259+586 went into an outburst in conjunction with a glitch. AXP 1E 1048.1-5937 has shown X-ray burst correlated with a glitch event. During the burst active phase of AXP 4U 0142+61  between 2006 and 2007, six short bursts and a glitch with a long recovery time were observed. AXP 1E 1841-045 has exhibited bursts and glitches, but not coincidentally . reported a burst and an extremely large glitch (\(\Delta{\nu}\)/\(\nu\) \(\sim\) 6 \(\times\) 10\(^{-5}\)) from CXOU J164710.2-455216, but the possibility of such a glitch was ruled out by . However, the latter team point out that a glitch with the size of usual AXP glitches may indeed have occurred. 1RXS J170849.0-400910  has been the most frequently glitching AXP, but it has not shown any bursts or remarkable flux variability related to the glitch epochs. It is still unclear whether glitches are always associated with radiative enhancements. Recently, suggested that in the context of the starquake model, glitches observed in the bright sources can be related to the radiative enhancements but due to the bright quiescent state of these sources and fast decay of the enhancements, these events can be observed as small changes in the luminosity or only detected in faint sources. 1RXS J170849.0-400910  is an AXP with a spin period of \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}11 s. After the discovery of its spin period, it has been monitored with *RXTE* for \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}13.8 yr. Analyzing the first \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}1.4 yr of data and have concluded that the source is a stable rotator. The continued monitoring has been essential in detecting three unambiguous glitches and three glitch candidates without any significant pulse profile variations . There appears to be a correlation between intensity and spectral hardness: the X-ray spectrum gets softer(harder) while the X-ray flux decreases(increases), possibly in relation with glitches. reported the same correlation in the hard X-rays using *INTEGRAL*/ISGRI data. However, claimed that they did not find the reported variability in their analysis. proposed that external magnetic field can twist and untwist. Twisting and untwisting of the external magnetic field can lead to cracks and unpin the vortices for the glitches. Such twist/untwist of the magnetic field with a period of \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}5\(-\)`<!-- -->`{=html}10 yr has been suggested as an explanation for the observed correlations . Here, we report on the analysis of long-term *RXTE* observations of 1RXS J170849.0-400910  spanning \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}6 yr. In §[2](#sect:obs){reference-type="ref" reference="sect:obs"} we describe *RXTE* observations that we used in our analysis. We present long-term timing characteristics of the source in §[3.1](#sect:timing){reference-type="ref" reference="sect:timing"}. In §[3.2](#sect:pulseprofile){reference-type="ref" reference="sect:pulseprofile"} & §[3.3](#sect:pulsedrates){reference-type="ref" reference="sect:pulsedrates"} we constructed the pulse profiles, calculated pulsed count rates and examined their variability both in time and energy. We present the results of our extensive search for glitches in §[3.4](#sect:glitches){reference-type="ref" reference="sect:glitches"}. Finally, in §[4](#sect:discuss){reference-type="ref" reference="sect:discuss"} we discuss our results in the context of glitch models and expectancy of glitches in the vortex unpinning model. # *RXTE* Observations {#sect:obs} 1RXS J170849.0-400910  has been almost regularly monitored with *RXTE* in 528 pointings since the beginning of 1998. Phase connected timing behavior of the source was investigated by using the *RXTE* data collected between 1998 January 12 and 2006 October 7, using data from 1998 January 13 to 2002 May 29, and using from 2003 January 5 to 2006 June 3. Here we analyzed *RXTE* data collected in 280 pointings between 2005 September 25 and 2011 November 17 with the Proportional Counter Array (PCA). Note that the first 49 pointings in our sample were also used by. We included them in order to maintain the continuity in the timing characteristics of 1RXS J170849.0-400910. Exposure times of individual *RXTE* observations ranged between 0.25 ks (in one observation) and 2.5 ks, with a mean exposure time of 1.9 ks (see Figure [\[fig:exposurehist\]](#fig:exposurehist){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:exposurehist"} for a distribution of exposure times). For our timing analysis, we used data collected with all operating Proportional Counter Units (PCUs) in GoodXenon mode that provides a fine time resolution of 1 \(\mu\)s. # Data Analysis And Results ## Phase Coherent Timing {#sect:timing} We selected events in the 2\(-\)`<!-- -->`{=html}6 keV energy range from the top Xenon layer of each PCU in order to maximize the signal-to-noise ratio, as done also by. All event arrival times were converted to the solar system barycenter and binned into light curves of 31.25 ms time resolution. We inspected each light curve for bursts and discarded the time intervals with the instrumental rate jumps. We merged observations together if the time gap between them was less than 0.1 days. The first set of observations (i.e., segment 0 in Table [\[tab:tablemain\]](#tab:tablemain){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:tablemain"}) which includes 49 observations from were folded initially with the spin ephemeris given by and later by maintaining the phase coherence. We then cross-correlated the folded pulse profiles with a high signal-to-noise template pulse profile generated from a subset of observations and determined the phase shifts of observations with respect to the template. We fitted phase shifts with \[\phi(t) = \phi_{0}(t_{0})+\nu_{0}(t-t_{0})+ \frac{1}{2}\dot{\nu_{0}}(t-t_{0})^{2} +..., \label{eq:taylorphase}\] whose coefficients yield the spin frequency, and its higher order time derivatives, if required. In Table [\[tab:tablemain\]](#tab:tablemain){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:tablemain"} we list the best fit spin frequency and frequency derivatives to the specified time intervals, obtained using also listed number of time of arrivals (TOAs). In Figure [\[fig:spindervflux\]](#fig:spindervflux){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:spindervflux"} (a) we present the spin frequency evolution of 1RXS J170849.0-400910, and in (b) phase residuals after subtraction of the best fit phase model given in Table [\[tab:tablemain\]](#tab:tablemain){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:tablemain"}. We obtained frequency derivatives by fitting a second order polynomial to the sub-intervals of about 2.5 months long data and present them in Figure [\[fig:spindervflux\]](#fig:spindervflux){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:spindervflux"} (c). ## Pulse Profile Evolution {#sect:pulseprofile} We investigated long term pulse profile evolution of the source both in energy and time. For the pulse profile analysis, we excluded data collected with PCU0 and the data of PCU1 for the observations after 2006 December 25 due to the loss of their propane layers (therefore, having elevated background levels). We obtained the pulse profiles with 32 phase bins by folding the data in six energy bands with the appropriate phase connected spin ephemeris given in Table [\[tab:tablemain\]](#tab:tablemain){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:tablemain"}. The energy intervals investigated are 2\(-\)`<!-- -->`{=html}10 keV, 2\(-\)`<!-- -->`{=html}4 keV, 4\(-\)`<!-- -->`{=html}6 keV, 6\(-\)`<!-- -->`{=html}8 keV, 8\(-\)`<!-- -->`{=html}12 keV and 12\(-\)`<!-- -->`{=html}30 keV. In order to account for the different number of operating PCUs, we normalized the rates of each bin with the number of active PCUs. Finally, we subtracted the DC level and divided by the maximum rate of each profile. In Figures [\[fig:1708prof1\]](#fig:1708prof1){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:1708prof1"} and [\[fig:1708prof2\]](#fig:1708prof2){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:1708prof2"}, we present the normalized pulse profiles for the six segments given in Table [\[tab:tablemain\]](#tab:tablemain){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:tablemain"} in six energy bands and their evolution in time. The 2\(-\)`<!-- -->`{=html}10 keV pulse profiles of 1RXS J170849.0-400910  are characterized by a broad structure formed by the superposition of two features: the main peak near the pulse phase, \(\phi\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}0.55 and a weaker shoulder around \(\phi\sim\) 0.85. Pulse profiles of the two lowest energy bands exhibit an additional shoulder (near phase \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}0.35) in the 55203 \(-\) 55516 epoch (Segment 4), which is not clearly seen in any other epochs. Pulse profiles in the 2\(-\)`<!-- -->`{=html}4 keV band consist of the main peak in all epochs, while the shoulder feature (\(\phi\sim\) 0.85) is either weak or non-existent. The shoulder appears in the 4\(-\)`<!-- -->`{=html}6 keV band, and becomes more dominant above 6 keV. Pulse profiles above 8 keV contain only the shoulder feature. Note the fact that the duty cycle of the pulse profiles drops with increasing energy. The dominance of the secondary peak (shoulder) with the increase in photon energy was also reported in by using *INTEGRAL*, *XMM\(-\)Newton* and earlier *RXTE* observations. We calculated the Fourier Powers (FPs) for a quantitative measure of the pulse profile variations. First we computed the Fourier transform of each profile and calculated the powers in the first six harmonics as FP\(_{\rm k}\) = 2(a\(_{\rm k}^2\) + b\(_{\rm k}^2\))/(\(\sigma^2_{\rm a_{\rm k}}~+~\sigma^2_{\rm b_{\rm k}})\). Here a\(_k\) and b\(_k\) are the coefficients in the Fourier series, and \(\sigma_{\rm a_{\rm k}}\) and \(\sigma_{\rm b_{\rm k}}\) are the uncertainties in the coefficients \(a_{\rm k}\) and \(b_{\rm k}\), respectively. Second, we corrected the powers for the binning using equation 2.19 of and calculated upper and lower limits to the FPs by using the method described in . Finally, we normalized the FPs by the total power. We show in Figure [\[fig:harmpow\]](#fig:harmpow){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:harmpow"}, the time evolution of the normalized harmonic powers in the first three Fourier harmonics. We find that the FPs remain fairly constant in time in all investigated energy intervals. ## Pulsed Count Rates {#sect:pulsedrates} PCA is not an imaging instrument; it collects all events originating within about 1\(^{o}\) (FWHM) field centered near the position of 1RXS J170849.0-400910. Therefore, we cannot construct a precise X-ray light curve of the source using PCA observations since the accurate determination of X-ray background with the PCA is not possible. Nevertheless, we can trace the behavior of the pulsed X-ray emission of 1RXS J170849.0-400910  since there is no other pulsed X-ray source with exactly the same pulse period in the vicinity. X-rays originating from the other sources in the field of view (even the pulsed ones) are averaged out after folding the data with the spin frequency of 1RXS J170849.0-400910  and remain within the DC level. For these reasons, we calculated the rms pulsed count rates of the source using \[{\rm PCR}_{\rm rms} = \left(\frac{1}{\rm N}\sum_{i=1}^{\rm N} ({\rm R}_{\rm i}-{\rm R}_{\rm ave})^2-\Delta {\rm R}_{\rm i}^2\right)^\frac{1}{2}\] \[\delta{\rm PCR_{\rm rms}} = \frac{1}{{\rm N}{\rm PCR}_{\rm rms}} \left(\sum_{i=1}^{\rm N} \left[({\rm R}_{\rm i}-{\rm R}_{\rm ave}) \Delta {\rm R}_{\rm i}\right]^2\right)^\frac{1}{2} \label{eq:rms}\] where \({\rm R}_{\rm i}\) are the count rates in each phase bin, \(\Delta{\rm R}_{\rm i}\) are their uncertainties, \({\rm R}_{\rm ave}\) is their average and N is the number of phase bins. Note that this is a background exempt representation of pulsed intensity of the source. In Figure [\[fig:spindervflux\]](#fig:spindervflux){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:spindervflux"}(d) we present the time variation of rms pulsed count rates in the 2\(-\)`<!-- -->`{=html}10 keV energy range. Here, each pulsed intensity value is an average of about 1 month of data accumulation. We find that the rms pulsed count rate in the 2\(-\)`<!-- -->`{=html}10 keV band does not show any significant variation. Figure [\[fig:rmsampendept\]](#fig:rmsampendept){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:rmsampendept"} presents the pulsed count rates as a function of energy (in other words, rough energy spectra of the pulsed X-ray emission from 1RXS J170849.0-400910). Power law fits to these rough energy spectra yield a general trend from a more steep shape to a more shallow one as time progresses. ## Search for Glitches {#sect:glitches} There is no explicit glitch detected in our data sample as it can be seen from the fit results to the phase drifts in Table [\[tab:tablemain\]](#tab:tablemain){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:tablemain"}. To investigate whether there are any small amplitude variations in phase drifts (i.e. frequency jumps), we fitted phase shifts using the MPFITFUN [^1] procedure which performs Levenberg-Marquardt least-squares fit with the corresponding phases of a glitch model containing a jump in every \(\sim\) 0.1 day and a linear decay, as follows: \[\nu(t) = \nu_{0}(t) + \Delta{\nu} + \Delta{\dot{\nu}}(t-t_{g}) \label{eq:glt}\] where \(\nu_{0}(t)\) is the preglitch frequency evolution, \(\Delta{\nu}\) is the frequency jump, \(\Delta{\dot{\nu}}\) is the change of the frequency derivative after the glitch and \(t_{g}\) is the epoch of the glitch. First we applied this methodology to a previously published glitch in 2005 June and a candidate glitch in 2005 September. We detected the frequency jumps (\(\Delta{\nu}\)) and glitch epochs in agreement with the published values. We then carried out the glitch search in all six epochs listed in Table [\[tab:tablemain\]](#tab:tablemain){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:tablemain"} as follows: For each epoch, we analyzed the fit results on the \(\Delta{\nu}\) versus the reduced \(\chi^{2}\) plane and identified the set of parameters corresponding to the lowest reduced \(\chi^{2}\) value. We then computed rms fluctuations of phase residuals using the possible glitch parameters and compared them with those obtained using the polynomial fit results listed in Table [\[tab:tablemain\]](#tab:tablemain){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:tablemain"}. We find that rms phase residual fluctuations with respect to the glitch model fits do not indicate any improvement in the fit quality compared to the polynomial fits (Figure [\[fig:sres\]](#fig:sres){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:sres"}). Moreover, the largest glitch amplitude (\(\Delta{\nu}\)) obtained is about 3\(\times\)`<!-- -->`{=html}10\(^{-8}\) Hz in segments 0, 1 and 5 which could well be due to random fluctuations of phases, as can be seen in Figure [\[fig:sres\]](#fig:sres){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:sres"}. Consecutive *RXTE* observations were typically performed at 7\(-\)`<!-- -->`{=html}10 day time intervals. Due to Sun constraints, there were five longer gaps of \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}50 days in our data set. In order to assess the probability for the detection of a glitch that might have occurred during these longer gaps, we adopted the detectability criterion defined as: \[\delta{\nu} + \delta{\dot{\nu}} * \Delta{t} \ll \Delta{\nu} \label{eq:crt}\] where \(\delta\nu\) and \(\delta\dot{\nu}\) specify the total error on the spin frequency and frequency derivative determined on both ends of the gap, \(\Delta\)t denotes the duration of the gap, and \(\Delta\nu\) is the change in spin frequency due to a putative glitch. Equation [\[eq:crt\]](#eq:crt){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:crt"} implies that \(\Delta\nu\) has to be much bigger than maximum phase error accumulated across the gap in order to identify it as a possible glitch event. We calculated the total phase error for each gap adopting the timing solutions on both sides of the gaps, and present these results in Table [\[tab:gapglitch\]](#tab:gapglitch){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:gapglitch"}. We then applied the glitch search methodology to \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}250 day long data segments centered around each gap (gap segment), and evaluated minimum \(\chi^{2}\) searches as explained above. Best-fit timing solutions are listed in Table [\[tab:gapglitch\]](#tab:gapglitch){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:gapglitch"}. Among all gaps, only glitch amplitudes in gap segment 3 (54687\(-\)`<!-- -->`{=html}54913) and gap segment 5 (55406\(-\)`<!-- -->`{=html}55666) satisfy condition [\[eq:crt\]](#eq:crt){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:crt"}. In particular, the glitch amplitude in gap segment 5 is \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}7 times larger than the noise criterion which makes it a rather strong candidate for a possible glitch event. The putative glitch identified in gap segment 3 has an amplitude \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}4 times larger than the corresponding minimum noise criterion. The amplitudes of estimated glitch events in gap segments 1, 2 and 4 possess large errors. The rms fluctuations of phase residuals in gap segments are similar in gap segments 1, 2, 3, and 5, while they are much larger in gap segment 4. Note that glitch amplitude in gap segment 4 is affected from an outlier phase measurement (see Figure [\[fig:gapres\]](#fig:gapres){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:gapres"}), without which the glitch amplitude becomes even less significant. We, therefore, identified two glitch candidates; a strong case in the gap segment 5, and another one in gap segment 3 which is slightly less robust. We discuss their implications below. # Discussion and Conclusions {#sect:discuss} We performed detailed long term timing studies of 1RXS J170849.0-400910  spanning \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}6 yr. Together with the earlier extensive study of the source by, our investigation considers the entire database of *RXTE* observations of 1RXS J170849.0-400910. In our long-term timing investigations, it was possible to describe the phase shifts with a second order polynomial in only one interval (Segment 4 in Table [\[tab:tablemain\]](#tab:tablemain){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:tablemain"}), while all other parts required higher order terms. These results are similar to what has been obtained by, , and , confirming the fact that 1RXS J170849.0-400910  is indeed a noisy pulsar. The pulse profile of 1RXS J170849.0-400910  in the 2\(-\)`<!-- -->`{=html}10 keV band does not show any significant variations over the last \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}6 yr, maintaining its general pulse structure as in the earlier epochs. A minor structure (described as a shoulder above) in the pulse profile below 4 keV becomes stronger with energy and dominates the pulse profiles above 8 keV, as also noted by regarding earlier observations of the source. We also find no significant changes in the rms pulsed count rates (i.e., a measure of the pulsed flux) in the 2\(-\)`<!-- -->`{=html}10 keV range. In these respects, 1RXS J170849.0-400910  exhibits an almost stable pulsed X-ray emission behavior. We constructed a coarse energy spectrum of the rms pulsed count rates for each observation segment and found that it becomes gradually harder with time, as indicated by a shallowing power law index. As a result of \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}14 yr of *RXTE* observations, three glitches with two different recovery characteristics were unveiled unambiguously, and three candidate glitches were suggested in the time baseline between 1999 and 2005. Such a glitching behavior of 1RXS J170849.0-400910  made this system one of the most frequently glitching pulsars. It is important to report the fact that, we do not find any unambiguous glitches in the time interval between 2006 and 2011. However, glitch search in the gaps yielded a strong candidate in gap 5 with glitch amplitude \(\sim\[10^{-7}\) which is \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}7 times larger than the noise in this gap and on the order of largest glitches observed from this source. We identified another candidate in gap segment 3, although it is slightly less robust. Glitches are generally explained by models involving the neutron star crust, superfluid component of the inner crust or core superfluid and starquakes. The superfluid vortex unpinning model involves the crust and inner crust superfluid. In this model vortices formed by superfluid are pinned to the neutron-rich nuclei. While the crust spins down due to the electromagnetic torques, a rotational lag between the superfluid component and the crust builds up. When a critical value of rotational lag (\(\delta\Omega\) \(\equiv\) \(\Omega_{s}\)-\(\Omega_{c}\), where \(\Omega_{s}\) and \(\Omega_{c}\) are the superfluid's and crust's rotational rate, respectively) is reached, vortices suddenly unpin, resulting in transfer of angular momentum to the crust, i.e., glitch. This lag also determines the glitch occurrence time interval. This model is successful in explaining large glitches (\(\Delta\nu\)/\(\nu\) \(\sim\) 10\(^{-6}\)), such as those observed from the Vela pulsar with an occurrence time interval of \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}2 yr . Another class of models invokes starquakes, which are triggered by the cracking of the solid neutron star when growing internal stresses strain the crust beyond its yield point . This critical strain can be reached due to several mechanisms: the star spin down causes a progressive decrease of the equilibrium oblateness of the crust; variations of the core magnetic field, due to the motion of core superfluid vortices coupled to it; and, in strongly magnetized neutron stars, the rapid diffusion of the core magnetic field (or the \"turbulent\" evolution of the crustal field) provides an alternative channel to produce crustal fractures ., based on the different recovery characteristics of the glitches of 1RXS J170849.0-400910, proposed that they can be explained by a magnetically-driven starquake model since they intrinsically involve local processes and a higher degree of complexity. In order to discriminate between different possible models, following, investigated the global properties of large pulsar glitches using a sample of 430 pulsars, excluding the Vela pulsar. As these sources are not continuously monitored due to limited telescope times or other observational constraints, there are unavoidable data gaps in between successive pointings. This case puts a serious constraint on the detectability of a glitch if it occurs in a data gap of a pulsar with noisy timing behavior. They introduced a noise criterion (see Eqn. [\[eq:crt\]](#eq:crt){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:crt"}) for significantly detecting frequency jumps in the observational gaps. Therefore, they restricted their analysis to the 19 pulsar glitches with \(\Delta{\nu}\)/\(\nu\) \(>\) \(10^{-7}\). They estimated the physical parameters, e.g., inter-glitch time for the vortex unpinning model and the glitch size for the core-quake model. The parameters of the former model were estimated with two different assumptions for unpinning: First, the critical glitch parameter is taken as \(\delta\Omega\) which is a representative of the number of vortices that is unpinned at the time of the glitch. Second, this parameter is taken as fractional density of the unpinned vortices that is proportional to \(\delta\Omega/\Omega\), as the density of vortices \(\propto\) \(\Omega\). They also assumed that the probability of observing \(n\) glitches is given by Poisson statistics. Glitch size estimation from the core-quake model is far bigger than the glitch amplitudes of the Vela pulsar and sample mean. Thus, their work statistically excluded the core-quake model. They also compared the parameter estimates of the vortex unpinning model with those of glitches from Vela and other pulsars, and concluded that the vortex unpinning model with a constant fractional vortex density (\(\langle\delta\Omega/\Omega\rangle\)) is the most compatible model and can represent an invariant for glitches. To test the glitch expectancy within the vortex unpinning model for 1RXS J170849.0-400910  glitches, we applied the same statistical glitch expectancy analysis and estimated the expected number of glitches using \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}14 yr of *RXTE* observations. We calculated the critical fractional vortex density of the vortex unpinning model by using the time span between 1998 January and 2005 November, which contains three glitches and three glitch candidates. For a single pulsar, \(\dot{\nu}\)/\(\nu\) value is not expected to fluctuate between observations. However, this is not the case for 1RXS J170849.0-400910  as it changes between-1.87\(\times\)`<!-- -->`{=html}10\(^{-12}\) s\(^{-1}\) and -1.31\(\times\)`<!-- -->`{=html}10\(^{-12}\) s\(^{-1}\) with an average value of -1.66\(\times\)`<!-- -->`{=html}10\(^{-12}\) s\(^{-1}\), which further implies the noisy timing characteristics of the source. Therefore, we performed our calculations for all these three values. First we included the observational gaps into the total time span which, by the chosen noise criterion, restricts our analysis to large glitches with \(\Delta{\nu}\)/\(\nu\) on the order of \(10^{-6}\). Using \(\dot{\nu}\)/\(\nu\) values and observed number of glitches with \(\Delta{\nu}\)/\(\nu\]\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}10\(^{-6}\) (i.e., n = 2), we obtain the upper, lower and average values for critical parameter value of the vortex unpinning model. We note an important fact here that a glitch candidate (i.e., near candidate glitch 2 in ) was reported by with a fractional amplitude of 1.2\(\times\)`<!-- -->`{=html}10\(^{-6}\). If the latter report is correct, the number of large glitches in the 1998\(-\)`<!-- -->`{=html}2005 interval would be 3 (i.e, n = 3) which changes the critical parameter. Finally, we excluded all data gaps except the ones with glitches reported in them, and the ones that satisfied the noise criterion in our analysis, and we considered all reported glitches with \(\Delta{\nu}\)/\(\nu\) \(\gtrsim\) 10\(^{-7}\) (i.e., n = 6) and calculated the critical parameters for this case as well. In Table [\[tab:gltexp\]](#tab:gltexp){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:gltexp"} we list the values of the critical parameter for each of the above-mentioned cases and their corresponding expected number of glitches in the time intervals between 1998\(-\)`<!-- -->`{=html}2005, 1998\(-\)`<!-- -->`{=html}2011, and 2006\(-\)`<!-- -->`{=html}2011. As expected, the average value of the critical parameter yields the observed number of glitches in the 1998\(-\)`<!-- -->`{=html}2005 interval. We find that the total number of expected glitches with fractional amplitudes of \(\gtrsim\)\(10^{-6}\) (n = 2 in Table [\[tab:gltexp\]](#tab:gltexp){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:gltexp"}) varies between 3.2 and 4.6 if the time baseline spans untill the end of the *RXTE* coverage of the source in 2011 November. The number of glitches in the 2006\(-\)`<!-- -->`{=html}2011 time range, where we found a strong candidate, were expected to range from 1.4 to 2.0. We then repeated the above procedure, this time excluding all data gaps except the ones with reported candidate glitches. In this case, the noise criterion allows consideration of all glitches with \(\Delta{\nu}\)/\(\nu\) \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}10\(^{-7}\) (i.e., n = 6), and we re-calculated the critical parameters (see Table [\[tab:gltexp\]](#tab:gltexp){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:gltexp"}). Glitch expectancy analysis within the context of vortex unpinning model suggests that 1RXS J170849.0-400910  might have had, on average, two large glitches in 6 yr, corresponding to the interval of 2006\(-\)`<!-- -->`{=html}2011 (Table [\[tab:gltexp\]](#tab:gltexp){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:gltexp"}). The two significant glitch candidates we identified in gap segments are, therefore, important, since they comprise the observed number to match with the expectancy of the vortex creep model. As far as only glitch statistics is concerned, this case implies that the mechanism leading to the observed glitches in 1RXS J170849.0-400910  is internal. However, where particular glitch characteristics were concerned (e.g., discrepancies in glitch recovery), the vortex unpinning model is argued to be not sufficient. 1RXS J170849.0-400910  is the only member of the magnetar family that has not exhibited energetic X-ray bursts. Almost all other AXPs, that have experienced timing glitches, emitted energetic bursts either in conjunction with (e.g., 1E 2259+586, ) or contemporaneous to their glitches. It is, therefore, suggestive that a common mechanism might be responsible for both glitches and bursts. The dipole magnetic field strength of 1RXS J170849.0-400910  as inferred from its spin period and spin-down rate is about 4.6\(\times\)`<!-- -->`{=html}10\(^{14}\) G, that is strong enough to produce significant deformation in the neutron star crust and eventually lead to the release of energy via bursts. Nevertheless, the condition on 1RXS J170849.0-400910  has not given rise to any observable bursts, even though it has experienced the largest number of glitches among all magnetars. While a common mechanism could reproduce coincident energetic bursts and glitches in general, it might be generating glitches but not detectable enhancements and bursts in 1RXS J170849.0-400910, possibly due to this source having slightly lower crust shear modulus, so that the release of less energy can still produce breaks in the crust. The energetic bursts, however, are not accounted for within the context of the vortex unpinning model which appears to be favored for this source in our statistical investigations. Recently suggested that vortices can be unpinned mechanically via oscillations rather than by a sudden heat release. According to their estimation, the relative velocity between the crust and superfluid, which is generated by the mechanical energy release at the depths below 100 m, can exceed the critical velocity lag and unpin the vortices. In order to explain the radiatively silent glitches seen in some AXPs (as in the case of 1RXS J170849.0-400910) they proposed that mechanically triggered glitch event might not be accompanied by a long-term X-ray brightening since a glitch can be triggered by a less energy release. In this picture, the origin of X-ray brightening is also through mechanical energy release and these flux enhancements are expected to be accompanied with glitch events. This scenario can be diagnosed through the exact timing of glitches with radiative enhancements . We would like to thank M. Ali Alpar and the anonymous referee for helpful comments. SŞM acknowledges support through the national graduate fellowship program of the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK). [^1]: http://purl.com/net/mpfit

{'timestamp': '2014-01-23T02:10:03', 'yymm': '1401', 'arxiv_id': '1401.5705', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5705'}

# Introduction Kudekar et al.  proved that spatial coupling can improve the belief-propagation (BP) threshold up to the maximum-a-posteriori (MAP) threshold. Since the original proof of this *threshold saturation* was complicated, several simpler proofs have been developed in . In this paper we generalize the methodology in to characterize the BP performance for extended spatially-coupled (SC) systems. Consider the density-evolution (DE) equations of an extended SC system with the number of sections \(L\) and coupling width \(W\) \[\label{DE_u_dis} u_{l}(i+1) = \frac{1}{W^{d}}\sum_{\boldsymbol{w}_{d}\in\mathcal{W}^{d}} \varphi(\boldsymbol{v}_{l+\boldsymbol{w}_{d}}(i)), \quad l\in\mathcal{L},\] \[\label{DE_v_dis} v_{l}(i) = \frac{1}{W^{\tilde{d}}}\sum_{\boldsymbol{w}_{\tilde{d}}\in\mathcal{W}^{\tilde{d}}} \psi(\boldsymbol{u}_{l-\boldsymbol{w}_{\tilde{d}}}(i)), \quad l\in\{W-1,\ldots,L-1\},\] with \(\mathcal{L}=\{0,\ldots,L-1\}\) and \(\mathcal{W}=\{0,\ldots,W-1\}\). For notational convenience, we have used the notation \(\boldsymbol{v}_{l+\boldsymbol{w}_{d}}(i) =(v_{l+w_{1}}(i),\ldots,v_{l+w_{d}}(i))\) and \(\boldsymbol{u}_{l-\boldsymbol{w}_{\tilde{d}}}(i) =(u_{l-w_{1}}(i),\ldots,u_{l-w_{\tilde{d}}}(i))\), with \(\boldsymbol{w}_{k}=(w_{1},\ldots,w_{k})\). The notation \(l+\boldsymbol{w}\) should be interpreted as \((l,\ldots,l)+\boldsymbol{w}\). In ([\[DE_u\_dis\]](#DE_u_dis){reference-type="ref" reference="DE_u_dis"}) and ([\[DE_v\_dis\]](#DE_v_dis){reference-type="ref" reference="DE_v_dis"}), the state \((u_{l}(i),v_{l}(i))\in\mathcal{D}\times\tilde{\mathcal{D}} \subset\mathbb{R}^{2}\) represents performance of a BP-based algorithm for section \(l\in\mathcal{L}\) in iteration \(i\). The two functions \(\varphi:\tilde{\mathcal{D}}^{d}\rightarrow\mathcal{D}\) and \(\psi:\mathcal{D}^{\tilde{d}}\rightarrow\tilde{\mathcal{D}}\) characterize the properties of the BP algorithm. The parameters \(d+1\) and \(\tilde{d}+1\) correspond to the degrees of check and variable nodes in low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes. In bit-interleaved coded modulation, \(d+1\) is equal to the modulation rate, whereas \(\tilde{d}=1\) is used. Without loss of generality, we postulate that larger variables \(u_{l}(i)\) and \(v_{l}(i)\) imply better performance. Let \((u_{\mathrm{opt}},v_{\mathrm{opt}})\) denote a fixed-point (FP) that has the largest \(u\) among all FPs of the DE equations for the uncoupled case \(W=1\). Thus, \((u_{\mathrm{opt}},v_{\mathrm{opt}})\) is a solution \((u,v)\) to the following FP equations: \[\label{FP} u = \varphi_{0}(v), \quad v = \psi_{0}(u),\] with \(\varphi_{0}(v)=\varphi(v,\ldots,v)\) and \(\psi_{0}(u)=\psi(u,\ldots,u)\). The FP \((u_{\mathrm{opt}},v_{\mathrm{opt}})\) corresponds to the best possible performance achieved by the BP algorithm. We assume that \(\varphi(v_{1},\ldots,v_{d})\) and \(\psi(u_{1},\ldots,u_{\tilde{d}})\) are bounded, smooth[^1], and strictly increasing in all arguments everywhere. The monotonicity implies that the performance of the BP algorithm improves monotonically. We impose the worst initial condition \(u_{l}(0)=u_{\mathrm{min}}=\inf\mathcal{D}\) for all \(l\in\mathcal{L}\) and the best boundary conditions \(v_{l}(i)=v_{\mathrm{opt}}\) for any \(l\notin\{W-1,\ldots,L-1\}\) and \(i\). The aim of spatial coupling is to let the state \((u_{l}(i),v_{l}(i))\) converge toward \((u_{\mathrm{opt}},v_{\mathrm{opt}})\) for all sections \(l\in\mathcal{L}\) after sufficiently many iterations via coupling. We consider the continuum limit in which \(L\) and \(W\) tend to infinity while the ratio \(\alpha=W/L\) is kept constant. The BP performance for the SC systems ([\[DE_u\_dis\]](#DE_u_dis){reference-type="ref" reference="DE_u_dis"}) and ([\[DE_v\_dis\]](#DE_v_dis){reference-type="ref" reference="DE_v_dis"}) is characterized by a potential function for the uncoupled system with \[\label{function_D} D(u;\psi) = \int\frac{\bigtriangleup\psi(u)}{\psi'_{0}(u)}du-\ln\psi_{0}'(u),\] where the single-variate Laplacian \(\bigtriangleup\psi(u)\) is given by \(\bigtriangleup\psi(u)=\sum_{j}\partial^{2}\psi/\partial u_{j}^{2} (u,\ldots,u)\). The goal of this paper is to prove the following statement: Theorem [\[theorem1\]](#theorem1){reference-type="ref" reference="theorem1"} is a generalization of previous[^2] works  for \(d=\tilde{d}=1\), and implies that the qualitative *shape* of the potential ([\[true_potential\]](#true_potential){reference-type="ref" reference="true_potential"}) determines whether the BP algorithm can achieve the best possible performance point \((u_{\mathrm{opt}},v_{\mathrm{opt}})\), whereas the uniqueness of solutions to the potential ([\[true_potential\]](#true_potential){reference-type="ref" reference="true_potential"}) does for the uncoupled case \(W=1\). The potential ([\[true_potential\]](#true_potential){reference-type="ref" reference="true_potential"}) reduces to the conventional one defined in for \(d=\tilde{d}=1\), and coincides with the conventional one for \(d,\tilde{d}>1\) if \(D(u;\psi)+D(\psi_{0}(u);\varphi)\) is independent of \(u\). The latter observation may imply that for \(d,\tilde{d}>1\) the BP threshold does not coincide with the MAP threshold for the corresponding uncoupled system, since the potential for \(d=\tilde{d}=1\) is used to characterize the MAP threshold. Theorem [\[theorem1\]](#theorem1){reference-type="ref" reference="theorem1"} is useful when no analytical formulas of the multi-variate functions \(\varphi\) and \(\psi\) in ([\[DE_u\_dis\]](#DE_u_dis){reference-type="ref" reference="DE_u_dis"}) and ([\[DE_v\_dis\]](#DE_v_dis){reference-type="ref" reference="DE_v_dis"}) are available. In this case, the cost for calculating the two functions numerically increases exponentially as \(d\) and \(\tilde{d}\) grow. Theorem [\[theorem1\]](#theorem1){reference-type="ref" reference="theorem1"} implies that we can know the BP performance just by estimating six single-variate functions \(\varphi_{0}\), \(\varphi_{0}'\), \(\bigtriangleup \varphi\), \(\psi_{0}\), \(\psi_{0}'\), and \(\bigtriangleup\psi\) via numerical integration or sampling. This paper is organized as follows: In Section [2](#sec2){reference-type="ref" reference="sec2"} we shall present an application of Theorem [\[theorem1\]](#theorem1){reference-type="ref" reference="theorem1"} to SC bit-interleaved coded modulation with iterative decoding (BICM-ID). Theorem [\[theorem1\]](#theorem1){reference-type="ref" reference="theorem1"} is proved in Section [3](#sec3){reference-type="ref" reference="sec3"}. # Application {#sec2} ## Spatially Coupled BICM-ID We consider a BICM-ID scheme with SC interleaving . One transmission consists of \(W-1\) binary training sequences of length \(M\) and of \(L-(W-1)\) binary codewords of length \(M\). The training sequences are utilized to anchor the performance of the system at the boundaries to the best performance \(v_{\mathrm{opt}}\). After SC interleaving of length \(LM\), the obtained binary sequences are mapped to \(LM/Q\) data symbols, with \(Q\) denoting the modulation rate. The data symbols are transmitted through a memoryless time-invariant communication channel, and detected with iterative decoding at the receiver side . We shall review a construction of SC interleaving . Let \(\{\pi_{l}^{\mathrm{in}}:l\in\mathcal{L}\}\) and \(\{\pi_{l}^{\mathrm{out}}:l\in\mathcal{L}\}\) denote \(2L\) independent random interleavers of length \(M\) that are bijections from \(\mathcal{M}=\{0,\ldots,M-1\}\) onto \(\mathcal{M}\). An SC interleaver \(\pi(m,l)\) is a bijection from \(\mathcal{M}\times\mathcal{L}\) onto \(\mathcal{M}\times\mathcal{L}\) that maps \(m\)th bit in section \(l\) to the pair \(\pi(m,l)\) of bit and section indices, \[\pi(m,l) = (\pi_{l'}^{\mathrm{out}}(\pi_{l}^{\mathrm{in}}(m)),l'), \quad l'=(l-(\pi_{l}^{\mathrm{in}}(m))_{W})_{L},\] where \((i)_{n}=i\mod n\in\{0,\ldots,n-1\}\) denotes the remainder for the division of \(i\in\mathbb{Z}\) by \(n\in\mathbb{N}\). From the construction, \(M\) bits in section \(l\) are sent to sections \(\{l,\ldots,(l-(W-1))_{L}\}\) with uniform frequency when \(M\) is a multiple of \(W\). As a result, each bit in section \(l'\) at the output side originates from a bit in sections \(\{l',\ldots,(l'+W-1)_{L}\}\) with equal probability. These properties result in the DE equations ([\[DE_u\_dis\]](#DE_u_dis){reference-type="ref" reference="DE_u_dis"}) and ([\[DE_v\_dis\]](#DE_v_dis){reference-type="ref" reference="DE_v_dis"}) with \(d=Q-1\) and \(\tilde{d}=1\) when \(M\) tends to infinity. Minus one is because iterative decoding is based on extrinsic feedback information. ## EXIT Chart Analysis Let us consider a mathematical model based on erasure extrinsic channels  that approximates the dynamical properties of the SC BICM-ID scheme in the limit \(M\to\infty\). The distributions of messages passed between the demodulator and the decoder are very complicated in general. This may be regarded as if bits were sent through *extrinsic* channels subject to very complicated noise. In order to approximate the message distributions with tractable one-parameter distributions, the extrinsic channels are replaced by binary erasure channels (BECs) with the same input-output mutual information as the original one. Consequently, it is sufficient to evaluate the dynamics of the mutual information, instead of that of complicated distributions. Under these assumptions, the DE equations for the SC BICM-ID scheme are given by ([\[DE_u\_dis\]](#DE_u_dis){reference-type="ref" reference="DE_u_dis"}) and ([\[DE_v\_dis\]](#DE_v_dis){reference-type="ref" reference="DE_v_dis"}) with \(d=Q-1\) and \(\tilde{d}=1\). The variable \(u_{l}(i)\in[0,1]\) corresponds to the mutual information emitted from the demodulator for section \(l\) in iteration \(i\), whereas \(v_{l}(i)\in[0,1]\) is the average mutual information that is the input to the decoder in section \(l\). The identity function \(\psi(u)=u\) with \(\tilde{d}=1\) is used. Let \(f(I_{1},\ldots,I_{Q-1})\) and \(g(I)\) denote the extrinsic information transfer (EXIT) functions for the MAP demodulator and the MAP decoder, respectively. The function \(\varphi\)[^3] is given by \(\varphi(v_{1},\ldots,v_{Q-1})=f(g(v_{1}),\ldots,g(v_{Q-1}))\). Introducing a variable \(z_{l}(i)\) that represents the mutual information emitted from the decoder for section \(l\) in iteration \(i\), we find that the DE equations ([\[DE_u\_dis\]](#DE_u_dis){reference-type="ref" reference="DE_u_dis"}) and ([\[DE_v\_dis\]](#DE_v_dis){reference-type="ref" reference="DE_v_dis"}) are represented as \[u_{l}(i+1) = \frac{1}{W^{Q-1}}\sum_{\boldsymbol{w}_{Q-1}\in\mathcal{W}^{Q-1}} f(\boldsymbol{z}_{l+\boldsymbol{w}_{Q-1}}(i)), \quad l\in\mathcal{L},\] \[z_{l}(i) = g\left( \frac{1}{W}\sum_{w=0}^{W-1}u_{l-w}(i) \right), \quad l\in\{W-1,\ldots,L-1\},\] where \(\boldsymbol{z}_{l+\boldsymbol{w}_{Q-1}}(i)\) is defined in the same manner as for \(\boldsymbol{v}_{l+\boldsymbol{w}_{d}}(i)\). Figure [\[fig1\]](#fig1){reference-type="ref" reference="fig1"} shows the EXIT chart for the uncoupled case \(W=1\). We used \((3,6)\)-LDPC codes, quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) with \(Q=4\) and a symbol mapping proposed in, and the additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) communication channel. We utilized an analytical expression of \(g\) for the MAP decoder . In practice, one may use the corresponding SC LDPC code based on BP decoding. We selected a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of \(5.76\) dB that is slightly larger than the minimum of SNRs such that \(u_{\mathrm{opt}}\) is the unique global stable solution of the potential ([\[true_potential\]](#true_potential){reference-type="ref" reference="true_potential"}) in Theorem [\[theorem1\]](#theorem1){reference-type="ref" reference="theorem1"}, so that the SC BICM-ID scheme can approach the target point \((z_{\mathrm{opt}},u_{\mathrm{opt}})=(1,f_{0}(1))\), with \(f_{0}(I)=f(I,\ldots,I)\). We find that the FP equations ([\[FP\]](#FP){reference-type="ref" reference="FP"}) have two stable solutions. One stable solution is the target solution \((z_{\mathrm{opt}},u_{\mathrm{opt}})=(1,f_{0}(1))\), and the other stable solution \((z_{\mathrm{BP}},u_{\mathrm{BP}})\) is a FP to which the BP algorithm converges for the uncoupled case \(W=1\). These observations imply that the conventional BICM-ID scheme cannot approach the target point \((1,f_{0}(1))\) in this case, whereas the SC BICM-ID scheme can. It is possible to understand the performance of the SC BICM-ID scheme from the EXIT chart for the *un*coupled case. Let \(S_{\mathrm{t}}\), \(S_{\mathrm{m}}\), and \(S_{\mathrm{b}}\) denote the three areas enclosed by the two curves in Fig. [\[fig1\]](#fig1){reference-type="ref" reference="fig1"} from top to bottom. From the area theorems for the MAP decoder , and the MAP demodulator , it is straightforward to find the relationship between the areas and the rate loss from the coded modulation (CM) capacity \(C_{\mathrm{CM}}\)  \[\label{rate_loss} C_{\mathrm{CM}}-Qr = QS_{\mathrm{b}} + Q(S_{\mathrm{t}}-S_{\mathrm{m}}),\] with \(r\) denoting the code rate. Expression ([\[rate_loss\]](#rate_loss){reference-type="ref" reference="rate_loss"}) implies that the rate loss from the CM capacity is characterized by \(S_{\mathrm{b}}\) and \(S_{\mathrm{t}}-S_{\mathrm{m}}\). We note that \(S_{\mathrm{t}}=S_{\mathrm{m}}\) holds at the BP threshold for conventional SC systems . Since \(S_{\mathrm{b}}\) is much smaller than \(S_{\mathrm{t}}-S_{\mathrm{m}}\) in Fig. [\[fig1\]](#fig1){reference-type="ref" reference="fig1"}, the gap between \(S_{\mathrm{t}}\) and \(S_{\mathrm{m}}\) is a dominant factor for the rate loss. In fact, the SNR that \(S_{\mathrm{t}}=S_{\mathrm{m}}\) holds is approximately \(5.29\) dB. Furthermore, the SNR corresponding to the CM capacity is approximately given by \(5.12\) dB. Since an SNR of \(5.76\) dB was considered in Fig. [\[fig1\]](#fig1){reference-type="ref" reference="fig1"}, the losses due to \(S_{\mathrm{b}}\) and \(S_{\mathrm{t}}-S_{\mathrm{m}}\) are given by \(5.29-5.12=0.17\) dB and \(5.76-5.29=0.47\) dB, respectively, if \(S_{\mathrm{b}}\) is assumed to be identical for the two SNRs \(5.29\) dB and \(5.76\) dB. # Proof of Theorem [\[theorem1\]](#theorem1){reference-type="ref" reference="theorem1"} {#sec3} ## Sketch The proof of Theorem [\[theorem1\]](#theorem1){reference-type="ref" reference="theorem1"} is a generalization of that in . We shall define a partial differential equation that characterizes the FPs to the DE equations ([\[DE_u\_dis\]](#DE_u_dis){reference-type="ref" reference="DE_u_dis"}) and ([\[DE_v\_dis\]](#DE_v_dis){reference-type="ref" reference="DE_v_dis"}). \[\frac{\partial\tilde{u}}{\partial t}(x,t) =-\tilde{u}(x,t) + \tilde{\mathfrak{L}}[\tilde{u}(\cdot,t)](x), \label{differential_system_u}\] where the differential operator \(\tilde{\mathfrak{L}}[\tilde{u}](x)\) for any smooth function \(\tilde{u}(x)\) on \([-1,1]\) is defined as \[\label{differential_operator} \tilde{\mathfrak{L}}[\tilde{u}](x) = \varphi_{0}(\psi_{0}(\tilde{u})) + \alpha^{2}\left[ A(\tilde{u})\left( \frac{d\tilde{u}}{dx} \right)^{2} + B(\tilde{u})\frac{d^{2}\tilde{u}}{dx^{2}} \right],\] with \(\tilde{u}\) denoting an abbreviation of \(\tilde{u}(x)\). In ([\[differential_operator\]](#differential_operator){reference-type="ref" reference="differential_operator"}), the two functions \(A(\tilde{u})\) and \(B(\tilde{u})\) are given by \[\label{function_A} A(\tilde{u}) = \frac{\varphi_{0}'(\psi_{0}(\tilde{u}))}{6}\left( \bigtriangleup\psi(\tilde{u}) + \frac{\bigtriangleup\varphi(\psi_{0}(\tilde{u}))\psi_{0}'(\tilde{u})^{2}} {\varphi_{0}'(\psi_{0}(\tilde{u}))} + \psi_{0}''(\tilde{u}) \right),\] \[\label{function_B} B(\tilde{u}) = \frac{1}{3}\varphi_{0}'(\psi_{0}(\tilde{u}))\psi_{0}'(\tilde{u}) > 0,\] respectively. We impose the boundary condition \(\tilde{u}(\pm 1,t)=u_{\mathrm{opt}}\). Furthermore, an initial condition \(\tilde{u}(x,0)=\tilde{u}_{\mathrm{init}}(x)\) is imposed with a smooth function \(\tilde{u}_{\mathrm{init}}(x)\). From Theorem [\[theorem2\]](#theorem2){reference-type="ref" reference="theorem2"}, it is sufficient to analyze the stationary solution \(\tilde{u}(x)\) to the partial differential equation ([\[differential_system_u\]](#differential_system_u){reference-type="ref" reference="differential_system_u"}), which satisfies \[\label{stationary_system} \tilde{u}-\varphi_{0}(\psi_{0}(\tilde{u})) = \alpha^{2}\left[ A(\tilde{u})\left( \frac{d\tilde{u}}{dx} \right)^{2} + B(\tilde{u})\frac{d^{2}\tilde{u}}{dx^{2}} \right],\] with the boundary condition \(\tilde{u}(\pm1)=u_{\mathrm{opt}}\). Theorem [\[theorem1\]](#theorem1){reference-type="ref" reference="theorem1"} follows immediately from the following theorem. with ([\[function_D\]](#function_D){reference-type="ref" reference="function_D"}). Substituting this expression into ([\[potential\]](#potential){reference-type="ref" reference="potential"}), we arrive at \(\tilde{V}(y)=V(f^{-1}(y))\) given by ([\[true_potential\]](#true_potential){reference-type="ref" reference="true_potential"}). This implies that Theorem [\[theorem3\]](#theorem3){reference-type="ref" reference="theorem3"} holds. for \(l\in\{W-1,\ldots,L-1\}\). Combining ([\[monotonicity\]](#monotonicity){reference-type="ref" reference="monotonicity"}) and the boundary condition \(v_{l}(i)=v_{l}(i+1)=v_{\mathrm{opt}}\) for \(l\notin\{W-1,\ldots,L-1\}\), we obtain \(v_{l}(i)\leq v_{l}(i+1)\) for all \(l\). Repeating the same argument for ([\[DE_u\_dis\]](#DE_u_dis){reference-type="ref" reference="DE_u_dis"}), we arrive at \(u_{l}(i+1)\leq u_{l}(i+2)\) for all \(l\). By induction, Lemma [\[lemma1\]](#lemma1){reference-type="ref" reference="lemma1"} holds. From the last property of Lemma [\[lemma3\]](#lemma3){reference-type="ref" reference="lemma3"}, there exists some smooth initial function \(\tilde{u}_{\mathrm{init}}(x)\) that is sufficiently close to the FP \(u(x)\) of the integral systems. We impose the initial condition \(\tilde{u}(x,0)=\tilde{u}_{\mathrm{init}}(x)\) for the differential system ([\[differential_system_u\]](#differential_system_u){reference-type="ref" reference="differential_system_u"}) with such an initial function. We next summarize several properties of the partial differential equation ([\[differential_system_u\]](#differential_system_u){reference-type="ref" reference="differential_system_u"}). It is straightforward to show that the second term tends to zero as \(\alpha\to0\). Thus, we focus on the first term. To complete the proof of Proposition [\[proposition1\]](#proposition1){reference-type="ref" reference="proposition1"}, it is sufficient to prove that the integrand \(|\mathfrak{L}[u](x)-\tilde{\mathfrak{L}}[u](x)|\) converges to zero as \(\alpha\to0\) for all \(x\in\mathcal{X}\) in the bulk region . Since \(u(x)\) is smooth, we can expand \(\mathfrak{L}[u](x)\) with respect to \(\alpha\) up to the second order. Expanding the integrand in ([\[DE_u\_cont\]](#DE_u_cont){reference-type="ref" reference="DE_u_cont"}) with respect to \(\boldsymbol{\omega}_{d}\) yields \[\label{DE_u_approx} \mathfrak{L}[u](x) = \varphi_{0}(v) + \frac{\alpha^{2}}{6}\left\{ \bigtriangleup\varphi(v)\left( \frac{dv}{dx} \right)^{2} + \varphi_{0}'(v)\frac{d^{2}v}{dx^{2}} \right\} + o(\alpha^{2}),\] where \(v\) is given by the right-hand side (RHS) of ([\[DE_v\_cont\]](#DE_v_cont){reference-type="ref" reference="DE_v_cont"}) with \(u(x,i)=u(x)\). Similarly, expanding \(v\) with respect to \(\alpha\) gives \[\label{DE_v_approx} v = \psi_{0}(u) + \frac{\alpha^{2}}{6}\left[ \bigtriangleup\psi(u)\left( \frac{du}{dx} \right)^{2} + \psi_{0}'(u)\frac{d^{2}u}{dx^{2}} \right] + o(\alpha^{2}),\] where \(u\) is an abbreviation of \(u(x)\). Substituting ([\[DE_v\_approx\]](#DE_v_approx){reference-type="ref" reference="DE_v_approx"}) into ([\[DE_u\_approx\]](#DE_u_approx){reference-type="ref" reference="DE_u_approx"}) and expanding the obtained formula with respect to \(\alpha\), we obtain \(\mathfrak{L}[u](x)=\tilde{\mathfrak{L}}[u](x)+o(\alpha^{2})\), given by ([\[differential_operator\]](#differential_operator){reference-type="ref" reference="differential_operator"}). We are ready to prove Theorem [\[theorem2\]](#theorem2){reference-type="ref" reference="theorem2"}. for all \(i\geq I\). From the second property of Lemma [\[lemma3\]](#lemma3){reference-type="ref" reference="lemma3"}, we find that the first term on the upper bound ([\[upper_bound\]](#upper_bound){reference-type="ref" reference="upper_bound"}) tends to zero in the continuum limit \(W=\alpha L\to\infty\). From the definition of the Riemann integral, the second term converges to the integral \[\label{second_term} \lim_{W=\alpha L\to\infty}\frac{1}{L}\sum_{l\in\mathcal{L}}|u(x_{l})-\tilde{u}(x_{l})| = \frac{1}{2}\int_{-1}^{1}|u(x)-\tilde{u}(x)|dx.\] Thus, it is sufficient to prove that the RHS of ([\[second_term\]](#second_term){reference-type="ref" reference="second_term"}) tends to zero as \(\alpha\to0\). For any \(\epsilon>0\) and some \(t_{0}\in\mathbb{R}\) in Lemma [\[stability\]](#stability){reference-type="ref" reference="stability"}, we use the triangle inequality to obtain \[\label{second_term_bound} \frac{1}{2}\int_{-1}^{1}|u(x)-\tilde{u}(x)|dx < \frac{1}{2}\int_{-1}^{1}|u(x)-\tilde{u}(x,t_{0})|dx + \epsilon.\] From Lemma [\[lemma4\]](#lemma4){reference-type="ref" reference="lemma4"} and the definition of the initial condition for the differential system ([\[differential_system_u\]](#differential_system_u){reference-type="ref" reference="differential_system_u"}), the first term on the upper bound ([\[second_term_bound\]](#second_term_bound){reference-type="ref" reference="second_term_bound"}) converges to zero as \(\alpha\to0\). :::

{'timestamp': '2014-04-21T02:05:04', 'yymm': '1401', 'arxiv_id': '1401.5897', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5897'}

# Introduction The past several decades have witnessed the increase in the speed of lasers as tracked by the duration of a laser pulse. In recent years, experimental groups have been able to decrease this duration into the attosecond regime. With each decrease in duration of the laser pulse, it is possible to probe quantum systems on shorter time scales. For example, there have been many recent measurements and calculations of the delay in the photoionization of electrons from atoms. This example is interesting in that the delay is only of order 10 as but can be measured using a streaking IR field *and* that measurements and calculations differ in the expected delay; the reason for the difference is not clarified. One of the results we discuss below is that delays in electron ejection naturally occur at higher laser intensities. Although both the laser frequency and duration determine what types of systems and phenomena are best investigated, there are types of processes whose similarities extend from the attosecond to the picosecond regime. One of the processes that spans a broad regime is that a short laser pulse can burn a hole in a wave function. The reason is that photoabsorption is often highly position dependent. For example, stationary phase considerations lead to the realization that photo-ionization occurs near the nucleus within a region \(r\sim \sqrt{(\ell +1)/\omega}\) with \(\omega\) being the angular frequency of the laser. Thus, a laser pulse that is shorter than the radial period of the electron can deplete the wave function in the neighborhood of the nucleus. Figure 1 is a schematic of two photon processes. The gray bands are meant to indicate the spread in energy for the processes that arise from the short duration of the laser. The dark arrow is the one photon excitation step. The narrow solid arrows are the two photon absorption (for increasing energy) and the Raman process (for decreasing energy). The Raman process back to \(\ell =0\) gives the hole burning of the initial wave function. The dashed arrows indicate three photon process that can interfere with the one photon absorption; the three photon processes can modify both the energy distribution and the ejection time of the electron. Hole burning was investigated in Rydberg states where the radial period can be in the picosecond regime. For a state with energy \(E=-1/2\nu^2\), the radial period is given by \(T_{Ryd}=2\pi\nu^3\) a.u. which is \(T_{Ryd}= 1.52\times 10^{-4}\nu^3\) ps. Thus, states with \(\nu > 18.7\) have periods longer than a picosecond. One of the manifestations of hole burning is Raman transitions to nearby states with the same \(\ell\). One way to think of this connection is that the wave function with the hole, \(\psi_h\), is projected onto the eigenstates with the laser off. Since the \(\psi_h\) mostly resembles the initial state and has the same angular momentum, the projection onto the initial state and states with small change in \(\nu\) and no change in \(\ell\) will be emphasized. The size of the hole in space increases with the duration of the laser pulse. Thus, a short laser pulse will lead to a wider energy range of final states. An equivalent statement in the frequency domain is that short pulses have a large bandwidth, supporting Raman transfer to neighbouring states. In this paper, we examine the phenomenon of hole burning in the regime of attosecond laser pulses. Since hole burning is at least a two photon process, the intensity regime will be higher than what is currently experimentally achieved but not so high that experiments are unthinkable. While the basic phenomenon of hole burning should be the same, there are differences due to the shorter time scale and hence the lower states involved. One difference is that for Rydberg states and picosecond lasers, the hole burning leads to population at both higher and lower energies (the principle quantum number can both increase or decrease) while for attosecond lasers the initial state is usually the ground state so population can only transfer to higher energies. Another difference is that the experiments on Rydberg state hole burning did not investigate when the *ejected* electron is modified by the hole burning. In attosecond physics, the time delay of the ejected electron is often one of the more interesting parts of the measurement but also used to define the 'zero' time delay in pump-probe experiments. We give calculations for this process and show that the hole burning leads to a delay in the ejection of the electron. This effect arises from the interference between one photon absorption and a three photon process (2 absorptions and one emission). We use atomic units unless SI units are explicitly given. # Numerical Method We solved the time dependent Schrödinger equation by representing the wave function on a grid of radial points and an angular momentum basis. A more extensive discussion of the technique can be found in Ref. . In our calculations, we used linearly polarized light which leads to a wave function that can be represented by the summation \[\Psi (\vec{r})=\sum_\ell [R_\ell (r,t)]Y_{\ell m}(\Omega )\] where the radial functions, \(R_\ell\), contain all of the useful information about the wave function. The maximum \(\ell\) in the sum is determined by the duration, strength and frequency of the laser and was chosen so that less than \(10^{-9}\) of the population was in \(\ell_{max}\). For ease in solving the time dependent Schrödinger equation, we consider the Hamiltonian for this calculation as the sum of two terms: \[H = H_1 + H_2 = H_{atom} + H_{field}\] where \(H_1\) is the atomic Hamiltonian which contains the kinetic energy operator and the spherical potential from the electron-ion interaction and the \(H_2\) is the laser-electron interaction. For hydrogen, the electron-ion potential is simply \(-1/r\). For the other atoms presented in this paper, a model potential can be used. The Hamiltonian for the laser field was taken to be in the length gauge. We do not need to worry about the increasing size of the laser potential with r because the laser duration is so short the electron does not travel far before the laser intensity returns to 0. We chose \(H_2 = z E(t)\) where \(E(t)=-dA/dt\) with \[A(t) = F(t) \frac{1}{\omega_0}\sin (\omega_0 t + \phi ).\] The \(\phi\) is the carrier envelope phase and \(F(t)\) is a smooth function giving the envelope. We chose this to be a Gaussian \(F(t)=F_{max}\exp (-t^2/t_w^2)\) with \(F_{max}\) the maximum electric field when the carrier envelope phase is zero. We used a split operator method with a Crank-Nicolson approximation to step the wave function by \(\delta t\). The approximation is \[\Psi(t+\delta t/2) = U_2(t,\delta t/2)U_1(\delta t)U_2(t,\delta t/2)\Psi (t-\delta t/2)\] where the \[U_j(t,\delta t) = [1-i H_j(t)\delta t/2][1+i H_j(t)\delta t/2]^{-1}\] gives \(O(\delta t^3)\) accuracy for one time step. In the propagator, we only need to perform the \(U_2\) when \(|t|<6t_w\) because \(H_2\) is approximately 0 outside of that range. Both the \(H_1\) and \(H_2\) operators can be represented as tridiagonal matrices. For the electric field, the operator \(H_2\) only couples \(\ell\) to \(\ell\pm 1\). We used two approximations for \(H_1\), both of which gives a tridiagonal representation, as a test of convergence. In the simplest approximation, we used equally spaced points in \(r\) (i.e. \(r_j = j\delta r\)) and a three point difference for the radial kinetic energy. The more complicated approximation used a square root mesh and a Numerov approximation as in Ref. . In all calculations, we checked convergence with respect to the number of radial points, the number of angular momenta, and the number of time steps. Before the laser turns on, the wave function is in an eigenstate. We find the eigenstate by diagonalizing \(H_1\) in a finite region \(r<r_{max}\). The \(r_{max}\) is chosen to be large enough that the wave function can not reach that distance while the laser is on. We also used the eigenstates of \(H_1\) to compute the energy distribution of the final state. The eigenstates go to 0 at \(r_{max}\) which leads to a discretized continuum. The energy distribution with angular momentum \(\ell\) is approximated by \[\label{eqEdis} P_\ell (\bar{E}) = \frac{|<a+1,\ell |\Psi >|^2 + |<a,\ell |\Psi >|^2}{2(E_{a+1,\ell}-E_{a,\ell})}\] where \(E_{a,\ell}\) is the energy of the \(a\)-th eigenstate with angular momentum \(\ell\), \(\bar{E}=(E_{a+1,\ell}+E_{a,\ell})/2\) is the average of the two energies, and \(<a,\ell |\Psi>\) is the projection of that eigenstate on the wave function. We also use this definition for negative energy states which allows us to treat both positive and negative energy on the same curve. This has the disadvantage that it is not clear what is the population in an individual state, which is a measurable quantity. # Two-photon processes In this section, we present results on two photon ionization and on one photon absorption followed by one photon emission (and vice versa). We investigate the latter process in more detail because it is the mechanism that leads to "hole burning\" of the initial orbital. It is important to remember that even a weak laser pulse whose time width is shorter than the Rydberg period will burn a hole in the wavefunction. The depth of the hole increases with laser intensity and, for weak fields, the result of the hole burning will scale with the square of the intensity. However, the states described in this section are not populated by other mechanisms and, thus, can be distinguished even for weak lasers. Figure 2 shows the energy distribution in atomic units for the 2-photon processes when starting from the 2s state of H. For the presentation of the energy distribution, we set the population in the 2s to 0 when using Eq. ([\[eqEdis\]](#eqEdis){reference-type="ref" reference="eqEdis"}) because we want a plot of what states gained population; this choice leads to an artificial dip in the Raman process. The solid line is the energy distribution where the electron has \(\ell =0\) and the dashed curve is for \(\ell =2\). In this calculation, we set \(\omega =1\) (\(=27.2\) eV, \(\lambda = 45.6\) nm), \(F_{max}=0.05\) a.u. and \(t_w=6.0\) a.u. The full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the laser intensity is \(t_{FWHM}=\sqrt{2\ln 2}t_w\) which corresponds to \(170\; as\) in this calculation. The electric field corresponds to a maximum laser intensity of \(8.8\times 10^{13}\) W/cm\(^2\) which is in the perturbative regime. Doubling the intensity increases the scale of Fig. 2 by a factor of 4. For this laser width, the state with the most population is the \(1s\) state; this is not obvious in Fig. 2 due to the large energy difference between the \(1s\) and \(2s\) states which gives a large denominator in Eq. ([\[eqEdis\]](#eqEdis){reference-type="ref" reference="eqEdis"}). There are a few features worth noting in Fig. 2. The two photon absorption peak is at nearly the same energy for the two angular momenta. However, this energy, 1.78 a.u., is *not* at the expected energy for two photon absorption which is \(-1/8 + 2= 1.875\) a.u.; the expected energy is marked by a vertical line in the graph. The peak is shifted down in energy because the two photon absorption amplitude is a decreasing function of energy; the product of the decreasing absorption amplitude and the Gaussian centered at 1.875 a.u. gives the approximately 0.09 a.u. shift. Using a longer laser pulse, leads to this feature becoming narrower in energy with the peak shifting toward the expected value of 1.875 a.u. For example, the peak shifts to 1.83 a.u. when \(t_w\) is increased to 8 a.u. It is interesting that the 2-photon absorption has nearly equal population in \(\ell = 0\) and 2 because the propensity to increase \(\ell\) when a photon is absorbed would lead to the expectation that the \(\ell =2\) would be substantially larger. In the \(\ell=0\) energy distribution, plotted in Fig. 2, there is large population corresponding to the two photon process where one photon is absorbed and one photon is emitted. This process is approximately 100\(\times\) smaller for \(\ell=2\). This disparity is somewhat surprising considering that the two photon absorption probability is comparable. The propensity rule would lead to the expectation that \(\ell =0\) would be larger than the \(\ell =2\) but not by such a large factor. We attribute the \(\ell=0\) population to hole burning of the initial orbital. The coherent superposition of these Raman states with the initial state leads to a "hole\" in the initial state at small \(r\). Figure 3 shows the total probability (\(\ell = 0\)) in the Raman transition and in the two photon absorption as the pulse duration is increased keeping all other parameters fixed; the data in this figure comes from integrating the energy distribution up to \(E=0.875\) for the Raman transition and above \(E=0.875\) for the two photon absorption. The dependence of the two photon absorption on \(t_w\) in Fig. 3 is the simplest to understand. The probability is approximately proportional to the duration because the ionization continues while the pulse is on. The behavior of the Raman population is more interesting, showing a slow increase followed by a decrease. The Raman population starts decreasing when \(t_w\) is comparable to half the classical period; more specifically we find \(t_w\sim\sqrt{8\ln 2} n^3\). This condition is when the energy FWHM of the laser field equals \(1/n^3\), i.e. the energy spacing of the atom. This fits with the interpretation of the Raman process with \(\Delta \ell = 0\) as equivalent to hole burning. When the laser is on for a time comparable to or longer than the radial period for the hole in the wave function, then there should not be any hole burning. Figure 4 shows how the energy distribution for \(\ell =0\) Raman transition changes as the pulse duration is increased keeping all other parameters fixed. One can see that the energy width is decreasing while the peak is increasing for longer \(t_w\). However, the longest times have almost no increase in the peak while the width continues to decrease. At even larger \(t_w\), the Raman population at all energies decreases until becoming approximately 0 when the bandwidth of the laser is too narrow to allow any change in energy. As with Fig. 2 population in individual states are hard to visualize. The population in the \(1s\) state for each of the curves (\(t_w=6\) through 30 a.u.) is 1.46E-7, 3.95E-8, 1.08E-9, 4.35E-12, 1.87E-15, and 1.87E-19 while the population in the 3s state is 1.67E-8, 4.02E-8, 7.62E-8, 1.09E-7, 1.30E-7, and 1.34E-7. Figure 5 shows how the energy distribution for \(\ell = 0\) Raman transition changes as the *frequency* changes keeping the pulse duration at \(t_w=18\) a.u. The shape of the energy distribution is nearly the same for all frequencies shown even though there is a difference of more than four orders of magnitude in the total population. This fits with the interpretation of "hole burning\" since the shape of the hole will mainly depend on the duration of the pulse and only weakly on the laser frequency; the Raman transitions arise from the projection of the hole in the initial wave function onto neighboring states. We note that the central energy of the 2-photon absorption peak shifts by \(\sim 5/3\) a.u. for the same range of frequencies shown in Fig. 5. We performed calculations for other single valence atoms and found similar results. An exception is when the single photon transition is at a Cooper minimum. The single photon ionization is strongly suppressed in this situation while the two photon absorption is enhanced compared to the Raman transition. # One photon/Three photon ionization The "hole burning\" can affect the one photon absorption process by changing the time when the electron is ionized and by changing the energy distribution near the one photon absorption peak. Within a perturbative picture, these effects result from the interference between one photon absorption and a three photon process (absorb-emit-absorb). The effect of "hole burning\" should be to delay the photon absorption because the wave function is being depleted near the nucleus which is where photoabsorption takes place; the photoabsorption is delayed for strong laser fields because the electron probability near the nucleus needs to refill which requires time. Unlike the Raman process which is present even for weak laser fields, this effect should only become apparent at higher laser intensity reflecting a substantial change in the wave function. For this section, we fixed the duration, \(t_w=6\) a.u., and frequency, \(\omega = 1\) a.u., of the laser pulse. In all calculations, we started from the \(2s\) state of hydrogen. The general trends did not depend strongly on the type of atom or initial state. Figure 6 shows the energy distribution for \(\ell=1\) near the one photon absorption peak for \(F_{max}=0.2\), 0.4 and 0.8 a.u. These fields correspond to intensities of \(1.4\times 10^{15}\), \(5.6\times 10^{15}\), and \(2.2\times 10^{16}\) W/cm\(^2\). The maxima have been scaled to equal 1 for all \(F_{max}\). As with the two photon absorption peak in Fig. 2, the position of the peak, \(\simeq 0.8\) a.u., is slightly shifted to lower energy compared to the expected value: \(1-1/8=0.875\) a.u. which is marked by a vertical line. The explanation of the shift is the same: the dipole transition matrix element is a decreasing function of energy. While the smaller \(F_{max}\) have nearly the same shape, the energy distribution is narrower and shifted slightly higher for the \(F_{max}=0.8\) a.u. case. This effect must be due to the interference between one photon absorption and a three photon process (either emit-absorb-absorb or absorb-emit-absorb or absorb-absorb-emit). By scaling all curves to have a peak of 1, we are hiding the fact that the energy distribution increases with laser intensity. However, we did not find that the increase was proportional to the laser intensity: the ratio of scaling factors for the highest and lowest intensities was 12 instead of 16 which is expected from perturbation theory. As a point of comparison for the largest \(F_{max}\), we compared other processes to that shown in Fig. 6. The \(p\)-wave three photon absorption is 240 times smaller. The \(f\)-wave energy distribution is approximately a 1000 times smaller for three photon absorption and of 2000 times smaller for the \(f\)-wave peak near 0.8 a.u. These small values might be surprising compared to the large nonperturbative character for the "one-photon\" peak (e.g. the one-photon absorption was approximately 25% too small at \(F_{max}=0.8\) a.u.). However, it must be remembered that the three photon processes can interfere with the one photon process which can lead to a larger effect: the probability for an effect arising from interference of one-and three-photon transitions is \(P=|A_1+A_3|^2 = |A_1|^2+(A_1A_3^*+A_1^*A_3) + |A_3|^2\). The interference term is proportional to the square of the laser intensity while pure three-photon processes are proportional to the cube of the laser intensity. We note that the energy spread for the 3-photon absorption peak is \(\sim 50\)% broader than the 1-photon peak; the extra broadness arises because the higher order process depend on higher powers of the intensity and, thus, they appear to be effectively shorter in duration. A simplistic argument would suggest that the 1 photon peak would get broader at higher intensity because of the addition of 3 photon character. The narrowing we actually observe must be due to interference. Figure 7 shows the time dependent current at \(r=50\) a.u. with the peak of the current scaled to be 1. A simple estimate of when the current should peak is \(t_{peak}\sim 50/\sqrt{2E}=39.5\) a.u. \(\simeq 953\) as. The actual peak is somewhat earlier in time because the \(-1/r\) potential gives a higher radial speed to the electron; a classical electron with energy 0.8 a.u. requires 907 as to reach 50 a.u. As in Fig. 6, the smaller intensities give similar results while the highest intensity gives a clear change. Part of the change is the current due to two-photon absorption which leads to higher energy electrons and a peak at early times; in a similar vein, there is a slow decay at the highest intensity due to the Raman process which gives low energy electrons that reach \(r=50\) a.u. at later times. A more interesting effect is that the one photon peak is delayed by \(\simeq 6\) as. Quantum mechanically this effect is due to the interference between one-and three-photon paths. Physically, the effect is consistent with the expectation of a time delay due to hole burning in the wave function. We note that the interference between one-and two-photon processes in a single attosecond absorption has been discussed for both energy and angular distributions. Reference  discussed the effect on electron asymmetries, Ref.  discussed the effect on momentum and energy distributions and Ref.  gave an analysis based on perturbation theory. In our Fig. 2, one can see that the one photon absorption peak which falls between the Raman and 2-photon absorption peak would overlap them in energy. This would lead to left/right asymmetries in the electron angular distribution as discussed in Ref. . # Conclusions We have performed calculations of attosecond absorption in one electron systems to explore some of the possible two-and three-photon effects. Our calculations demonstrate that one of the main two-photon effects is a Raman type process that leads to a strong redistribution of population with the same angular momentum as the initial state. We expect this process to be common and is related to "hole burning\" of the initial wave function. The calculations also show that the interference of one-and three-photon paths can lead to changes substantially larger than might be expected. We argued that the time delay in the one-photon absorption with increasing laser intensity is also due to "hole burning\" of the wave function. Because the absorption mainly occurs near the nucleus, a hole there will decrease the ionization rate and lead to a delay of the photoabsorption. In this paper, we focused on the hole burning in a one electron system. There can be other types of hole burning in two (or more) electron systems. An example involving a short range perturber coupled to a Rydberg series was investigated using the Ba \(6snd\) \(^{1,3}D_2\) states perturbed by the \(5d7d\) \(^1D_2\) state as the example. As an example requiring attosecond lasers, the Be ground state is nominally \(2s^2\) in the valence shell. Calculations that include correlation have found that there is a large admixture of \(2p^2\) in the ground state wave function. Typically, the photo-ionization is different from \(2s\) and \(2p\) orbitals. This leads to the possibility of having a hole burned in the radial coordinate (as described above) and a hole burned in the correlation. This will lead to substantial Raman transition to the nominally \(2p^2\) autoionizing state. Thus, other types of wave packets can be initiated using hole burning. This work was supported by the Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences Division of the Office of Basic Energy Sciencs, U.S. Department of Energy and by NWO. We acknowledge support from the EU Marie Curie ITN COHERENCE Network.

{'timestamp': '2014-01-23T02:08:30', 'yymm': '1401', 'arxiv_id': '1401.5643', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5643'}

# Introduction Flux compactifications of type IIB string theory / F-theory can generate large supersymmetric masses for moduli, so that the moduli particles decay well before the period of big-bang nucleosynthesis. In addition to this phenomenological advantage, the discretum of vacua in this class of compactifications provides an ensemble of vacua (or landscape), which gives rise to a scientific/stringy basis for a notion of naturalness. Certainly the (geometric phase) Calabi--Yau compactifications of type IIB / F-theory are not more than a small subset of all possible vacua in string theory. However, one can still think of some use in such a restricted ensemble of vacua because supersymmetric extensions of the Standard Model and grand unification can be naturally accommodated in this framework. Given a topological configuration of three-form fluxes in type IIB string theory compactified on a Calabi--Yau threefold \(M_3\), the dilaton and complex structure moduli of \(M_3\) are stabilized and their vacuum expectation values (vevs) are determined. By this mechanism, however, not only the moduli vevs (= the coupling constants of the low-energy effective theories), but also a configuration of D7-branes (= (a part of) the gauge group of the effective theories) is determined. Low-energy effective theories in particle physics are usually crudely classified by such information as gauge groups, matter representations, types of non-vanishing interactions and matter multiplicity, and then the effective theories sharing this information are distinguished by the values of coupling constants. In order to fit this natural framework of thought, ensembles of string flux vacua should also be crudely classified by algebraic and topological information. After this, statistics should be presented in the form of distributions over the moduli space of compactifications sharing the same set of algebraic and topological information. With the statistics of flux vacua presented in this way, we begin to be able to ask such naturalness-related questions as the ratio of the number of vacua having various algebraic and/or topological data or the distribution of various coupling constants (moduli parameters) in a class of theories having a give set of algebraic/topological data. This article aims at taking one step further in this program. The distribution of gauge groups in effective four-dimensional theories derived from string compactifications has been studied from several perspectives in the literature, see for examples. Stabilization / determination of D7-brane configurations can be understood purely in type IIB language in terms of calibration conditions . Another option is to use F-theory, where the 7-brane configuration, dilaton vev and complex structure moduli of \(M_3\) are all treated as part of the complex structure moduli of a Calabi--Yau fourfold \(Y_4\). In F-theory language, there are two ways to understand the mechanism of determination of the moduli vevs. One is to specify the four-form flux on an elliptic fibred Calabi--Yau fourfold \(Y\) topologically,[^1] \[\in H^4(Y; \Z)\,.\] The Gukov--Vafa--Witten superpotential \[W_{\rm GVW} \propto \int_Y \Omega_Y \wedge G^{(4)} \label{eq:GVW}\] gives rise to an F-term scalar potential that depends on the complex structure moduli of \(Y\). The minimization of this potential determines the vevs of those moduli. Once the moduli vevs arrive at the minimum of the potential (and if the cosmological constant happens to vanish), the four-form flux \(G^{(4)}\) is guaranteed to only have a \((2,2)\) component in the Hodge decomposition under the complex structure corresponding to the vevs. In the presence of the four-form flux, the moduli fields slide down the potential to find a vacuum complex structure, so that \([G^{(4)}]\) only has the \((2,2)\) component. If we are to allow large vacuum expectation values of \(W_{\rm GVW}\) \([G^{(4)}]\) may also have \((4,0)\) and \((0,4)\) components. An alternative way to characterize the vacuum choice of the complex structure of \(Y\) is available by focussing on the finitely generated Abelian group \[H^4(Y; \Z) \cap H^{2,2}(Y; \R) \, \qquad \qquad \left({\rm or~} H^4(Y; \Z) \cap H^{2,2}(Y;\R) \oplus [ H^{4,0}(Y; \C) + {\rm h.c} ] \right)\,. \label{eq:Hodge-22}\] The rank of this Abelian group remains constant almost everywhere on the moduli space of the complex structure of \(Y\), but it jumps at special loci. In mathematics, this problem---at which loci in the moduli space the rank of this Abelian group jumps, and how it changes there---is known as the Noether--Lefschetz problem. Once we find a point in the Noether--Lefschetz locus and insert four-form flux in the enhanced part of the Abelian group ([\[eq:Hodge-22\]](#eq:Hodge-22){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:Hodge-22"}), we can no longer go away continuously from the Noether--Lefschetz loci in the moduli space while keeping the flux purely of type \((2,2)\). The higher the codimension of a Noether--Lefschetz locus is in the complex structure moduli space, the more moduli are given masses and stabilized. Therefore, the problem of determination of vacuum complex structure is equivalent to the Noether--Lefschetz problem (e.g., ). [^2] This article begins, in Sections [2.2](#ssec:extended-list){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:extended-list"}, [4.1](#ssec:J1-J2-phys){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:J1-J2-phys"}, [4.3](#ssec:sample-stats){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:sample-stats"} and [5.2](#ssec:rank-16){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:rank-16"} in particular, with exploiting this equivalence[^3] to see how the Noether--Lefschetz problem in F-theory determines statistics of such things as gauge group, discrete symmetry and moduli vevs. We focus our attention on \(K3 \times K3\) compactifications of F-theory, as in. This compactification cannot be considered realistic enough for an immediate use in particle physics (e.g. there are no matter curves), but a sufficient complexity is involved in this toy model of landscape to make it suitable for the purpose of clarifying various concepts as well as sharpening technical tools. In the process of deriving statistics, one cannot avoid asking about the modular group (e.g., ). In other words, we have to understand when a pair of seemingly different compactification data actually correspond to the same vacuum in physics. In F-theory we have to introduce some equivalence relation among the space of elliptic fibrations that are admitted by \(Y_4\), so that the quotient space corresponds to the set of physically distinct vacua. In Section [3.2](#ssec:Het-F-AutX){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:Het-F-AutX"}, we use the duality between heterotic string theory and F-theory, and find that the modulo-isomorphism classification of elliptic fibrations should be adopted. This observation yields two problems. One is purely mathematical: how can we work out the modulo-isomorphism classification of elliptic fibration for a given \(Y_4\) ? A companion paper by the present authors is dedicated to this problem, with a Calabi--Yau fourfold \(Y_4\) replaced by a K3 surface, and the results in are reviewed mainly in Section [4.1](#ssec:J1-J2-phys){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:J1-J2-phys"} in this article. The other problem is how to use such results in mathematics to carry out vacuum counting in physics. We take on this issue in Section [4.2](#ssec:sbtl-stat){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:sbtl-stat"}. Sample statistics, which give us some feeling of what string landscapes can do to answer statistical/naturalness questions in particle physics, are obtained in Sections [4.3](#ssec:sample-stats){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:sample-stats"} and [5.2](#ssec:rank-16){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:rank-16"}. At the same time, though, the study running up to Section [5.2](#ssec:rank-16){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:rank-16"} in this article along with also hints that it may not be easy to pursue the Noether--Lefschetz problem approach for Calabi--Yau fourfolds which are not as simple as \({\rm K3} \times {\rm K3}\) or K3-fibration over some complex surface. One may of course always use the strategy of computing periods, as done e.g. in in the present context. Of course, this approach has its own technical challenges. The theory of is a promising direction to go beyond a case-by-case study for different choices of fourfolds \(Y\). Therefore, the second theme begins to dominate in Section [5.4](#ssec:orientifold-beyond){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:orientifold-beyond"} toward the end of this article. Since articles as and seemed to have had applications in Type IIB orientifold compactifications in mind primarily, we clarify how to use the Ashok--Denef--Douglas theory to study statistics of flux vacua in F-theory, with the total ensemble resolved into sub-ensembles according to their algebraic and/or topological data such as gauge groups and matter multiplicity. The presentation in sits in the middle between our discussion up to Section [5.2](#ssec:rank-16){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:rank-16"} and that of , and makes it easier to understand how the conceptual issues discussed in the sections up to [5.3](#ssec:MW-singl-fbr-flux){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:MW-singl-fbr-flux"} fit into the Ashok--Denef--Douglas theory. Although the presentation in Section [5.4](#ssec:orientifold-beyond){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:orientifold-beyond"} and Appendix [\[sec:ADD\]](#sec:ADD){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:ADD"} uses \(K3\times K3\) compactification as an example, we tried to phrase it in a way ready for generalization at least to cases with K3-fibred Calabi--Yau fourfolds, and possibly to general F-theory compactifications. There is also the third theme behind Sections [4.3.2](#sssec:FMW){reference-type="ref" reference="sssec:FMW"}, [5.3](#ssec:MW-singl-fbr-flux){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:MW-singl-fbr-flux"} and Appendix [\[sec:Km-E6E6\]](#sec:Km-E6E6){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:Km-E6E6"} in this article. In the duality between heterotic string theory and F-theory, the dictionary of flux data has been mostly phrased by using the stable degeneration limit of. This was for good reasons, because [@Curio:1998bva; @DW-1; @Hayashi-1] focused on fluxes in F-theory that are directly responsible for the chirality of non-Abelian (GUT gauge group) charged matter fields on the matter curves. There is an extra algebraic curve in the singular fibre over the matter curve in the F-theory geometry, and a flux can be introduced in this algebraic cycle. For more general flux configurations, however, it is not a priori clear to what extent we can use the \(dP_9 \cup dP_9\) limit in the duality dictionary, because \(dP_9 \cup dP_9\) is quite different from a K3 surface when it comes to whether two-cycles are algebraic or not. There is the work of, indicating that \({\rm U}(1)\) flux associated with an elliptically fibred geometry with an extra section stabilizes some complex structure moduli. Furthermore, the spectral cover description of vector bundles in heterotic string theory did not rule out twisting information \(\gamma\) which is more general than ([\[eq:FMW-flux\]](#eq:FMW-flux){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:FMW-flux"}) for special choices of complex structure. Section [5.3](#ssec:MW-singl-fbr-flux){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:MW-singl-fbr-flux"} and the Appendix [\[sec:Km-E6E6\]](#sec:Km-E6E6){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:Km-E6E6"} provide a comprehensive understanding of this material, generalizing the duality dictionary of the flux data in the literature without relying on the \(dP_9 \cup dP_9\) limit. Appendix [\[sec:Km-E6E6\]](#sec:Km-E6E6){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:Km-E6E6"} also makes a trial attempt of studying how much information of such fluxes can be captured by the \(dP_9 \cup dP_9\) limit. A similar theme has already been studied extensively in the series of papers [@Caltech-0906; @Caltech-0912; @Caltech-1006; @Caltech-1102; @Caltech-1107; @Caltech-1211]. It will be interesting to clarify the relation between the logical construction given there and the presentation in this article, but this task is beyond the scope of this present article. All \(K3\) surfaces which appear as solutions in this article have Picard number \(20\), which fixes the rank of the total gauge group to be \(18\) (this is the 'geometric' gauge group, which can still be further broken by fluxes). Whenever the non-abelian part of the gauge group has rank less than \(18\), there are \({\rm U}(1)\) factors which are geometrically realized as extra sections of the elliptic fibration. The explicit construction of extra section has been an active research program in recent years. As discussed in, sections can be realized by demanding appropriate factorization conditions in the Weierstrass model. A study of fluxes in (a resolution of) the scenario of appeared in. As already discussed in, extra sections can equivalently be obtained by realizing the elliptic fibre as a hypersurface in ambient spaces with more than a single toric divisor. This strategy is systematically exploited in . Using toric techniques, in particular the classification of tops, models with \(I_5\) fibres and extra sections were constructed in . Given a specific embedding of the fibre, one can also use a similar approach as , i.e. use Tate's algorithm, to find all possible degenerations leading to a prescribed gauge group. F-theory compactifications with \({\rm U}(1)\) symmetries also give rise to an interesting interplay between geometry and anomalies of the effective field theory, see for some recent works in this direction. We regret that we use some mathematical jargon and notations, which are non-standard in the physics literature, without explanations. Sections 2--4 of the mathematical companion paper of the present article should contain the necessary background. # Four-Form Flux in M/F-Theory on \({\rm K3} \times {\rm K3}\) ## Review of Known Results {#ssec:review-AK} Compactification of F-theory on \(Y = {\rm K3} \times {\rm K3}\) has been studied from various perspectives in the literature. To start off, we begin this section with a review of a result in. [^4] Their results are immediate for M-theory compactification down to 2+1-dimensions, but it is clear that we can build a study of F-theory compactification down to 3+1-dimensions by adding extra structure and imposing conditions on top of the discussion for M-theory. When the Calabi--Yau fourfold \(Y\) is a product of two K3 surfaces, \(S_1\) and \(S_2\), the complex structure moduli space of \(Y\), \({\cal M}_{\rm cpx}(Y)\), is the product of the complex structure moduli space of \(S_1\) and \(S_2\), \({\cal M}_{\rm cpx}(S_1) \times {\cal M}_{\rm cpx}(S_2)\). A discussion of the modular group is postponed to later sections. Over the moduli space of \([h^{3,1}(Y) = h^{1,1}(S_1) + h^{1,1}(S_2) = 40]\) dimensions, the Hodge decomposition of \(H^4(Y; \C)\) varies, because the decompositions of \(H^2(S_1; \C)\) and \(H^2(S_2; \C)\) vary on the moduli spaces of the two K3 surfaces.[^5] \[\begin{aligned} H^{2,2}(Y; \R) & = H^{1,1}(S_1; \R) \otimes H^{1,1}(S_2; \R) + [H^{2,0}(S_1; \C) \otimes H^{0,2}(S_2; \C) + {\rm h.c.}]\,, \label{eq:H22-Y-decomp} \\ [ H^{4,0}(Y; \C) + {\rm h.c.} ] & = [H^{2,0} (S_1; \C) \otimes H^{2,0} (S_2; \C) + {\rm h.c.}]\, , \label{eq:H40-Y-decomp} \end{aligned}\] where \([V + {\rm h.c.}]\) for a complex vector space \(V\) with \({\rm dim}_\C V = 1\) denotes the corresponding 2-dimensional vector space over \(\R\). The Hodge components \([H^{4,0}(Y;\C) + {\rm h.c}]\) are also included here for now, partly because the four-form flux with non-vanishing \((4,0)\) and \((0,4)\) components still preserves AdS supersymmetry. The overlap between \(H^2(S_1; \Z) \otimes H^2(S_2; \Z) \subset H^4(Y; \Z)\) and \(H^{2,2} \oplus [H^{4,0} + {\rm h.c.}]\) has the maximal rank, 404, when \[\label{attrK3cond} {\rm rank} \left[ H^2(S_1; \Z) \cap H^{1,1}(S_1; \R) \right] = 20, \qquad {\rm rank} \left[ H^2(S_2; \Z) \cap H^{1,1}(S_2; \R) \right] = 20 \,.\] The loci satisfying these conditions have complex codimension \(40\) in the moduli space \({\cal M}_{\rm cpx}(S_1) \times {\cal M}_{\rm cpx}(S_2)\), and hence are isolated points. Once plenty of fluxes are introduced in this rank 404 free Abelian group, all the complex structure moduli are stabilized. The Abelian group \[S_X = \left[ H^{1,1}(X; \R) \cap H^2(X; \Z) \right] \subset H^2(X; \Z)\] for a K3 surface \(X\) is called Neron--Severi lattice (or group), and the rank of \(S_X\)---denoted by \(\rho_X\) or \(\rho(X)\)---is called the Picard number of \(X\). \(S_X\) is empty for \(X\) with a generic complex structure, but its rank can be as large as 20, which is possible only in points of \({\cal M}_{\rm cpx}(X)\). K3 surfaces with \(\rho_X = 20\) are called *attractive K3 surfaces* in.[^6] Thus, the ensemble of flux vacua of M-theory/F-theory compactifications on \(Y= {\rm K3} \times {\rm K3}\) are mapped into a subset of \({\cal M}_{\rm cpx}(S_1) \times {\cal M}_{\rm cpx}(S_2)\) where both \(S_1\) and \(S_2\) are attractive K3 surfaces. It is convenient for the classification of K3 surfaces with large Picard number to use the transcendental lattice. For a K3 surface \(X\), it is defined as the orthogonal complement of \(S_X\) under the intersection form in \(H^2(X; \Z)\): \[T_X := \left[ (S_X)^\perp \subset H^2(X; \Z) \right].\] For a K3 surface with Picard number \(\rho_X\), \({\rm rank}(T_X)=22-\rho_X\). K3 surfaces with a given transcendental lattice form a \((20-\rho_X)\)-dimensional subspace of \({\cal M}_{\rm cpx}({\rm K3})\), and in particular, attractive K3 surfaces are in one-to-one correspondence[^7] with rank-2 transcendental lattices (modulo orientation-preserving basis change). For an attractive K3 surface \(X\), its rank-2 transcendental lattice has to be even and positive definite. This is equivalent to the condition that, for a set of generators \(\{p,q\}\) of \(T_X\), the intersection from is given by[^8] \[\left[ \begin{array}{cc} (p,p) & (p,q) \\ (q,p) & (q,q) \end{array} \right] = \left[ \begin{array}{cc} 2a & b \\ b & 2c \end{array} \right], \label{eq:def-of-abc-1}\] where \(a,b,c\) are all integers, \(Q := 4ac-b^2\) is positive, and \(a,c>0\). The 2-dimensional vector space \(T_X \otimes \C\) over \(\C\) (resp. \(T_X \otimes \R\) over \(\R\)) agrees precisely with the vector space \(H^{2,0}(X; \C) \oplus H^{0,2}(X; \C)\) (resp. \([H^{2,0}(X; \C) + {\rm h.c.}]\)), and the complex vector subspace \(H^{2,0}(X; \C) \subset T_X \otimes \C\) is identified with \(\C \cdot \Omega_X \subset T_X \otimes \C\), where \[T_X \otimes \C \ni \Omega_X := p + \tau q, \qquad \qquad \tau := \frac{-b + i\sqrt{Q}}{2c}\,. \label{eq:TX-OmegaX}\] With orientation-preserving basis changes of \(T_X\), one can always choose the integers \(a, b, c\) such that \[0 \leq |b| \leq c \leq a \qquad ({\rm but} \quad 0\leq b \quad {\rm if~} c = a) \qquad {\rm and~} Q > 0\,. \label{eq:def-of-abc-2}\] An attractive K3 surface characterized by integers \(a, b, c\) in the way explained above is denoted by \(X_{[a~b~c]}\) in this article. For a pair of attractive K3 surfaces \(S_1\) and \(S_2\), let \(\{q_1, p_1\}\) and \(\{q_2,p_2\}\) be the oriented basis of \(T_{S_1}\) and \(T_{S_2}\), respectively. The intersection form in this basis is denoted by \[\left[ \begin{array}{cc} (p_1, p_1) & (p_1,q_1) \\ (q_1,p_1) & (q_1,q_1) \end{array} \right] = \left[ \begin{array}{cc} 2a & b \\ b & 2c \end{array} \right]\,, \qquad \qquad \left[ \begin{array}{cc} (p_2, p_2) & (p_2,q_2) \\ (q_2,p_2) & (q_2,q_2) \end{array} \right] = \left[ \begin{array}{cc} 2d & e \\ e & 2f \end{array} \right]\,, \label{eq:def-of-abcdef}\] where \(a,b,c,d,e\) and \(f\) are all integers. The positive definiteness implies that \[\begin{aligned} && 0 \leq |b| \leq c \leq a, \qquad ({\rm but~}0 \leq b {\rm ~if~}c = a), \qquad Q_1:=4ac-b^2 > 0, \label{eq:cond-abc} \\ && 0 \leq |e| \leq f \leq d, \qquad ({\rm but~}0 \leq e {\rm ~if~}f = d), \qquad Q_2:= 4df-c^2 > 0, \end{aligned}\] where all \(a, \cdots, f\) are integers. The holomorphic (2,0)-forms on the K3 surfaces \(S_1 = X_{[a~b~c]}\) and \(S_2 = X_{[d~e~f]}\) can then be written as \[\label{omega_ifromlattice} \Omega_{S_1} = p_1 + \tau_1 q_1, \quad \tau_1 = \frac{-b + i \sqrt{Q_1}}{2c}, \qquad \Omega_{S_2} = p_2 + \tau_2 q_2, \quad \tau_2 = \frac{-e + i \sqrt{Q_2}}{2f} \,.\] Note that \(\tau_1 \in \Q[\sqrt{Q_1}]\) and \(\tau_2 \in \Q[\sqrt{Q_2}]\). Both \(\Q[\sqrt{Q_1}]\) and \(\Q[\sqrt{Q_2}]\) are degree 2 (\({\cal D}=2\)) algebraic extensions of \(\Q\) (see Ref. ). In physics applications, we would rather like to impose one more condition. The M2/D3-brane tadpole cancellation is equivalent to \[\frac{1}{2} \int_Y (G \wedge G) + N_{M2/D3} = \frac{\chi(Y)}{24} = 24\,, \label{eq:D3-tadpole}\] where \(N_{M2/D3}\) is the number of M2/D3-branes minus anti-M2/D3-branes (that are point like) in \(Y\). When we exclude anti M2/D3-branes on \(Y\), \(N_{M2/D3} \geq 0\), and thus not all the pairs of attractive K3 surfaces in \({\cal M}_{\rm cpx}(S_1) \times {\cal M}_{\rm cpx}(S_2)\) qualify for the landscape of flux vacua of M-theory compactified on \(Y = {\rm K3} \times {\rm K3}\). Aspinwall and Kallosh carried out an explicit study of which pairs of attractive K3 surfaces can satisfy the condition ([\[eq:D3-tadpole\]](#eq:D3-tadpole){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:D3-tadpole"}), within a couple of constraints that make the analysis easier. In order to state one of the constraints introduced in, we need the following definition. Let us focus on a pair of attractive K3 surfaces \(S_1\) and \(S_2\). Any \(G^{(4)}\) in ([\[eq:Hodge-22\]](#eq:Hodge-22){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:Hodge-22"}) on \(Y = S_1 \times S_2\) can be decomposed, under the Hodge structure of \(Y\), into \([G] = [G_1] + [G_0]\), where \[\begin{aligned} & \in \left[ H^{1,1}(S_1; \R) \otimes H^{1,1}(S_2; \R) \right] = S_{S_1} \otimes S_{S_2} \otimes \R, \label{eq:G0-def} \\ [G_1] & \in \left[ H^{2,0}(S_1; \C) \otimes H^{0,2}(S_2; \C) + {\rm h.c.} \right], \label{eq:G1-def-W=0} \\ & \qquad \left({\rm or} \qquad \in \left[ H^{2,0}(S_1; \C) + {\rm h.c.} \right] \otimes \left[ H^{2,0}(S_2; \C) + {\rm h.c.} \right] = T_{S_1} \otimes T_{S_2} \otimes \R \right)\,. \label{eq:G1-def-Wnot=0} \end{aligned}\] The explicit study in Ref. assumes that \[= 0, \label{eq:no-G0}\] and[^9] \([G_1] \neq 0\) is that of ([\[eq:G1-def-W=0\]](#eq:G1-def-W=0){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:G1-def-W=0"}) rather than ([\[eq:G1-def-Wnot=0\]](#eq:G1-def-Wnot=0){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:G1-def-Wnot=0"}), so that \(G^{(4)} = G_1\) is purely of \((2,2)\) type in the Hodge structure of \(Y=S_1 \times S_2\), and the vev of \(W_{\rm GVW}\) vanishes. Another assumption is to set \[N_{M2/D3} = 0\,,\] so that \[\frac{1}{2} [G_1] \cdot [G_1] = 24\,. \label{eq:G1-totflux=24}\] Under these constraints, \([G_1]\) has to be an integral element of \(T_{S_1} \otimes T_{S_2}\): \[\in [H^{2,0}(S_1; \C) \otimes H^{0,2}(S_2; \C) + {\rm h.c.}] \cap (T_{S_1} \otimes T_{S_2}). \label{eq:2dimR-in-4dimR}\] It is not always guaranteed for any pair of attractive K3 surfaces \(S_1\) and \(S_2\) that there can be \([G_1] \neq 0\). The Abelian group on the right hand side of ([\[eq:2dimR-in-4dimR\]](#eq:2dimR-in-4dimR){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:2dimR-in-4dimR"}) can be empty. Writing down \([G_1]\) as \[= {\rm Re} \left(\gamma \Omega_{S_1}\wedge\overline{\Omega}_{S_2} \right)\, \label{eq:G1-gamma-def}\] for some \(\gamma \in \C\) and expanding this in the integral basis \(\{p_1 \otimes p_2, \; q_1 \otimes p_2, \; p_1 \otimes q_2, \; q_1 \otimes q_2 \}\) of \(T_{S_1} \otimes T_{S_2}\), Aspinwall and Kallosh found that ([\[eq:2dimR-in-4dimR\]](#eq:2dimR-in-4dimR){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:2dimR-in-4dimR"}) is non-empty if and only if \[{}^\exists m \in \Z \quad {\rm s.t.} \quad Q_1 Q_2 = m^2\,. \label{eq:square-integer}\] This implies that the two algebraic number fields \(\Q[\sqrt{Q_1}]\) and \(\Q[\sqrt{Q_2}]\) are the same. All the period integrals of the holomorphic (4,0) form \(\Omega_Y = \Omega_{S_1} \wedge \Omega_{S_2}\) take values in the common degree-2 (\({\cal D}=2\)) algebraic extension field \(\Q[\sqrt{Q_1}]\) of \(\Q\) (c.f. ). ::: When we compare the numbers in the two tables (Tables [5](#tab:nmbr-U1-4K3s-Nishiyama){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:nmbr-U1-4K3s-Nishiyama"} and [6](#tab:nmbr-U1-X302){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:nmbr-U1-X302"}) for \(E_n\) with \({\rm rank}(MW)=r\) (\(E_n \times {\rm U}(1)^{r} \times ({\rm any~non~Abelian})\) massless gauge fields on 7-branes) and for \(E_{n-1}\) with \({\rm rank}(MW)=r+1\) (\(E_{n-1} \times {\rm U}(1)^{r+1} \times ({\rm any~non~Abelian})\) massless gauge fields on 7-branes), we cannot observe a clear tendency. There are as many \(E_n \times {\rm U}(1)^{r}\) (i.e., more unified) vacua as \(E_{n-1} \times {\rm U}(1)^{r+1}\) (i.e., less unified) vacua in this sample. Although we cannot hope to extract too many lessons from this study based on a miniature landscape, it may not be too outrageous to say that this statistics does not indicate that it is nonsense to study unified theories in compactifications. **CP Violation** Just like in earlier work such as, the miniature landscape in this section can also be used to study the fraction of vacua preserving CP symmetry. To be more specific, we study the fraction of CP preserving vacua in the class of effective theories containing \(E_8 \times E_8\) gauge group from 7-branes. Such a formulation of the problem is meaningful, because we would eventually like to ask the fraction of CP-preserving/violating vacua in effective theories with the Standard Model gauge group. The choice of the gauge group---\(E_8 \times E_8\)---is entirely for a technical reason. For most other choices of the gauge group, we would have to work out the \({\cal J}_2(X)\) classification for all the 34 attractive K3 surfaces appearing in Table [3](#tab:AK-notmorethan24){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:AK-notmorethan24"}. It is known, however, (see, or Footnote [\[fn:E8E8\]](#fn:E8E8){reference-type="ref" reference="fn:E8E8"} for an explanation) that any attractive K3 surface admits an elliptic fibration whose frame lattice contains the \(E_8 \oplus E_8\) lattice, so that there must be two fibres of type \(II^*\). In Table [3](#tab:AK-notmorethan24){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:AK-notmorethan24"}, there are 66 pairs of attractive K3 surfaces \(Y = S_1 \times S_2\) for M-theory compactifications. From these, one can find 98 choices of \(Y= X \times S = X_{[a~b~c]} \times X_{[a'~b'~c']}\) for F-theory compactifications, where elliptic fibrations (with the vanishing volume of the fibre) are implemented in \(X_{[a~b~c]}\). Exploiting the \(\Z_2\vev{{\rm c.c.}}\) in the modular group \(\Gamma\) in ([\[eq:modular-group-F\]](#eq:modular-group-F){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:modular-group-F"}), we can always take \(b \geq 0\). We take these 98 different choices as the denominator (whole ensemble) of the statistics (see the cautionary remark at the end of this CP study). In order to see when the low-energy effective theory possesses CP symmetry, let us write down the Gukov--Vafa--Witten superpotential ([\[eq:GVW\]](#eq:GVW){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:GVW"}, [\[eq:G1-gamma-def\]](#eq:G1-gamma-def){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:G1-gamma-def"}) explicitly in terms of local coordinates of the moduli space \({\cal M}_{K3}^{(S_1)} \times {\cal M}_{K3}^{(S_2)}\). Let \(\Omega_{S_i}^{\rm tot}\) for \(i = 1,2\) be the total holomorphic \((2,0)\)-form on the K3 surface \(S_i\) for \(i=1,2\), including both the vacuum value and fluctuation around it: \[\Omega_{S_i}^{\rm tot} = \vev{\Omega_{S_i}} + \delta \Omega_{S_i} = p_i + q_i (\tau_i + \widetilde{\Pi}_i) + C^{(i)}_I \delta\Pi^{(i)}_I, \qquad i=1,2\,. \label{eq:Omega-fluct-expansion};\] The \(\Omega_{S_i}\) which appeared in Section [2.1](#ssec:review-AK){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:review-AK"} corresponds to the vacuum value \(\vev{\Omega_{S_i}}\) here, and \(\{C_I^{(i)}\}_{I=1,\cdots,20}\) is a basis of the Neron--Severi lattice \(S_{S_i}\). \(\delta\Pi_I^{(i)}\) for \(i=1,2\) and \(I = 1,\cdots, 20\) combined are the independent local coordinates of \({\cal M}_{K3}^{(S_1)} \times {\cal M}_{K3}^{(S_2)}\), and \(\widetilde{\Pi}_i\) are determined by the condition \((\Omega_{S_i} + \delta \Omega_{S_i})^2 = 0\). In practice, \[\begin{aligned} \tau_1 + \widetilde{\Pi}_1 & = & \frac{-b + i \sqrt{Q_1 + 2c (\delta\Pi^{(1)})^2 }}{2c} = \tau_1 + \frac{i\sqrt{Q_1}}{2c} \left( \frac{c (\delta \Pi^{(1)})^2}{Q_1}- \frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{c(\delta\Pi^{(1)})^2}{Q_1}\right)^2 + \cdots \right), \\ \tau_2 + \widetilde{\Pi}_2 & = & \frac{-e + i \sqrt{Q_2 + 2f (\delta\Pi^{(2)})^2 }}{2f} = \tau_2 + \frac{i \sqrt{Q_2}}{2f} \left( \frac{f (\delta \Pi^{(2)})^2}{Q_2}- \frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{f(\delta\Pi^{(2)})^2}{Q_2}\right)^2 + \cdots \right)\,, \end{aligned}\] where \((\delta\Pi^{(i)})^2\) is the norm of \(C_I^{(i)} \delta\Pi_I^{(i)}\) under the symmetric pairing of the Neron--Severi lattices \(S_{S_i}\). Substituting ([\[eq:Omega-fluct-expansion\]](#eq:Omega-fluct-expansion){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:Omega-fluct-expansion"}) into ([\[eq:GVW\]](#eq:GVW){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:GVW"}, [\[eq:G1-gamma-def\]](#eq:G1-gamma-def){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:G1-gamma-def"}), we obtain \[\begin{aligned} W & \propto & \left(G_1, (\Omega^{\rm tot}_{S_1} \otimes \Omega^{\rm tot}_{S_2}) \right) \\ & = & \sqrt{Q_1Q_2} \left[ {\rm Re}(\gamma\tau_1\bar{\tau}_2) + {\rm Re}(\gamma) (\tau_1 + \widetilde{\Pi}_1)(\tau_2 + \widetilde{\Pi}_2) \right. \nonumber \\ & & \qquad \qquad \left. -{\rm Re}(\gamma \bar{\tau}_2) (\tau_1+\widetilde{\Pi}_1) -{\rm Re}(\gamma \tau_1) (\tau_2+\widetilde{\Pi}_2) \right]\,, \label{eq:flux-eff-super} \end{aligned}\] This potential contains mass terms of all the fluctuations,[^42] as expected (moduli stabilization), and furthermore quartic and higher order interactions, as is known very well. Note first the vacuum expectation value of this superpotential vanishes. One can see this by expanding ([\[eq:flux-eff-super\]](#eq:flux-eff-super){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:flux-eff-super"}) in a power series of \((\delta \Pi^{(i)})^2\) and evaluating the zero-th order term. The vanishing vev of \(W_{\rm GVW}\), however, is a straightforward consequence of choosing the four-form flux to be purely of \((2,2)\) type in the Hodge decomposition. It will be difficult to find a symmetry reason for this vanishing vev of \(W_{\rm GVW}\) covering all the 66 pairs of \(S_1 \times S_2\) for M-theory compactification, or all the 98 choices of \(X \times S\) for F-theory. It seems more appropriate to consider that the \({\cal D}=2\) condition ([\[eq:square-integer\]](#eq:square-integer){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:square-integer"}) is essential, see the discussion right after ([\[eq:square-integer\]](#eq:square-integer){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:square-integer"}) and ([\[eq:40-04-components\]](#eq:40-04-components){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:40-04-components"}), and also. The integral structure of the flux quanta plays an essential role in determining the moduli vev through \(W_{\rm GVW}\). Hence it is not appropriate to apply naive naturalness arguments of bottom up phenomenology. In a subset of vacua where \(b = e = 0\) for M-theory (\(b = b' = 0\) for F-theory), both \(\tau_1\) and \(\tau_2\) are purely imaginary and the GVW superpotential becomes CP invariant when we choose \(\gamma\) to be either purely real or pure imaginary. In the first case, the two terms in the second line of ([\[eq:flux-eff-super\]](#eq:flux-eff-super){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:flux-eff-super"}) vanish, and all the terms in the superpotential have real valued coefficients. In the latter case, the two terms in the first line of ([\[eq:flux-eff-super\]](#eq:flux-eff-super){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:flux-eff-super"}) vanish, and all the remaining terms---those in the second line---have purely imaginary coefficients. With an appropriate phase redefinition of fermion fields (R-symmetry transformation), those coefficients can be made real valued. Thus, for these two case, all of the coefficients in the effective superpotential can be made real valued (by field redefinitions, if necessary), and CP symmetry is preserved. Following, we understand that the CP invariance in the former case is due to the compactification data \(([a~b~c], [d~e~f], \gamma)\) invariant under the \(\Z_2\vev{{\rm c.c.}}\) subgroup of the modular group \(\Gamma\), and is due, in the latter case, to the compactification data being invariant under the combination of the \({\rm c.c.}\) operation followed by a non-modular group symmetry operation (that somehow becomes an R-symmetry transformation). Among the 66 pairs of attractive K3 surfaces in Table [3](#tab:AK-notmorethan24){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:AK-notmorethan24"}, there are 20 pairs where \(b = e = 0\) and \(\gamma\) is either purely real or purely imaginary. To turn this statistics into that of F-theory compactifications, note that among the 98 different ways of identifying the 66 pairs with \(X \times S\) for F-theory, 30 different ways correspond to \(b = b' = 0\) and a purely real/imaginary choice of \(\gamma\). Although such precise values as \(30/98\) do not have much importance,[^43][^44] it will not be too outrageous to conclude that a non-negligible fraction of vacua possesses CP symmetry in the landscape of \({\rm K3} \times {\rm K3}\) compactifications of F-theory with all the 40 complex structure moduli stabilized by the \(G_1\) type four-form flux. See also related discussion in Section [5](#sec:G0-flux){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:G0-flux"}. ### Stable Degeneration "Limit" {#sssec:FMW} F-theory compactifications on \(Y= {\rm K3} \times {\rm K3} = X \times S\) (without a four-form background) are dual to heterotic string compactifications on \(Z = T^2 \times {\rm K3}\) [@Kachru:1995wm; @Aldazabal:1995yw; @Vafa-evidence; @Morrison:1996na; @Morrison:1996pp; @Bershadsky:1996nh; @Friedman:1997yq; @Bershadsky:1997zs]. From the heterotic string picture, one would naively expect that the Kaluza--Klein reduction of metric and \(B\)-field on \(T^2\) gives rise to 4 massless \({\rm U}(1)\) vector fields in 7+1-dimensions, in addition to the at most rank-16 gauge group from either \(E_8 \times E_8\) or \(\SO(32)\). Since F-theory compactifications on an attractive K3 surface \(X\) have rank 20 gauge groups on 7-branes (two \({\rm U}(1)\)'s from \(T_X\) and rank 18 from \(W_{\rm frame}\)), there is no mismatch in the rank of the gauge groups. It often happens in the miniature landscape we studied, however, that there are not more than four \({\rm U}(1)\) factors in the 7-brane gauge group. In Tables [5](#tab:nmbr-U1-4K3s-Nishiyama){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:nmbr-U1-4K3s-Nishiyama"} and [6](#tab:nmbr-U1-X302){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:nmbr-U1-X302"}, for example, the rank of Mordell--Weil lattice is less than two (meaning that the number of \({\rm U}(1)\) gauge group is less than four) in a large fraction of the types of elliptic fibrations. By looking at the Tables in, one can confirm that this phenomenon is not an artefact of requiring either one of \(E_6\), \(E_7\) or \(E_8\) in the 7-brane gauge group. An appropriate interpretation of this phenomenon should be that the large fraction of attractive K3 surfaces in \({\rm Isom}^+(\Lambda_{\rm K3}) \backslash D^{(X)}_{\rho=20}\) satisfying both the D3-tadpole condition ([\[eq:G1-partflux\<=24\]](#eq:G1-partflux<=24){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:G1-partflux<=24"}) and the pure \(G_1\)-type assumption ([\[eq:no-G0\]](#eq:no-G0){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:no-G0"}) does not correspond to the large \({\rm vol}(T^2)/\ell_s^2\) region of the heterotic string moduli space. In this case, the supergravity approximation is not valid and some of the non-Abelian 7-brane gauge groups should be understood as stringy effects in heterotic language. Corresponding to the supergravity (large \({\rm vol}(T^2)/\ell_s^2\)) "limit" in heterotic string theory is the stable degeneration "limit" of a K3 surface in F-theory. In this section, we discuss a couple of issues associated with this supergravity/stable degeneration "limit", based on the statistics in the miniature landscape. In this article, we mean by large/small "limit" of a moduli parameter xxx the region of moduli space where xxx is parametrically large/small, i.e., \({\rm xxx} \gg 1\) or \({\rm xxx} \ll 1\). However, we still assume xxx to be different from literally being \(\infty\) or \(0\). Let us begin with reminding ourselves of the following. Suppose that the elliptic fibration of a K3 surface \(\pi_X: X \longrightarrow \P^1\) is given by the generalized Weierstrass form (or Tate form) \[\begin{aligned} y^2 & = & x^3 + x f_0 z^4 + g_0 z^6 \nonumber \\ & & \qquad + \epsilon_\eta (a^{\rm v}_{0*} z^5 + \epsilon_K^2 a^{\rm v}_{2*} x z^3 + \epsilon_K^3 a^{\rm v}_{3*}y z^2 + \epsilon_K^4 a^{\rm v}_{4*} x^2 z + \cdots ) \nonumber \\ & & \qquad + \epsilon_\eta (a^{\rm h}_{0*} z^7 + \epsilon_K^2 a^{\rm h}_{2*} x z^5 + \epsilon_K^3 a^{\rm h}_{3*} y z^4 + \cdots )\, , \label{eq:Weierstrass-degen-lim} \end{aligned}\] where \((x,y)\) are the coordinates of the elliptic fibre, \(z\) the inhomogeneous coordinate of the base \(\P^1\), and \(f_0\), \(g_0\), \(a^{\rm v}_{r*}\)'s \((r=0,2,\cdots)\) and \(a^{\rm h}_{r*}\)'s are complex numbers of order unity. In the heterotic dual, \({\rm vol}(T^2)/\ell_s^2\) is parametrically large when[^45] \(|\epsilon_\eta| \ll 1\), \(|\epsilon_K| \lesssim {\cal O}(1)\). K3 surfaces with an elliptic fibration with small \(\epsilon_\eta\) are said to be in the stable degeneration "limit" [@Morrison:1996pp; @Friedman:1997yq].[^46] When \(|\epsilon_{\eta}| \ll 1\), and the heterotic dual (in the supergravity approximation) corresponds to \(E^{\rm v}_8 \times E^{\rm h}_8\) theory with the structure group \(G^{\rm v}_{\rm str} \times G^{\rm h}_{\rm str} \subset E^{\rm v}_8 \times E^{\rm h}_8\), so that the unbroken symmetry group in the visible and hidden sector are \(H^{\rm v} \times H^{\rm h}\), the non-\(U_*\) part of the cohomology group of K3 surface \(X\), \[\cong [U^{\oplus 2} \oplus E_8^{\oplus 2}] = {\rm II}_{2,18}\,, \label{eq:U2-E82}\] contains \(H^{\rm v} + G^{\rm v}_{\rm str} + U + U + G^{\rm h}_{\rm str} + H^{\rm h}\). The moduli spaces on both sides of the duality are identified by identifying the right-moving momenta (see Appendix [\[sec:Het-Narain\]](#sec:Het-Narain){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:Het-Narain"} for conventions on the description of \(T^2\) compactification of heterotic string theory) \[{\cal Z}^R: = \sqrt{\frac{\alpha'}{2}} (k^R_8+ik^R_9) \in {\rm Hom}({\rm II}_{2,18}, \C)\] in heterotic string theory with the period integral \(\Omega^{\rm norm.} \in [U_*^\perp \subset \Lambda_{\rm K3}]^* \otimes \C\) satisfying the normalization[^47] \[({\cal Z}^R, \overline{{\cal Z}^R}) = 2 \leftrightarrow (\Omega^{\rm norm.}, \overline{\Omega^{\rm norm.}} ) = 2 \,.\] Parametrically large volume \({\rm vol}(T^2)/\ell_s^2\) with \(\ell_s^2 := (2\pi)^2\alpha'\) in heterotic string theory corresponds to the behaviour \[{\cal Z}^R|_{U \oplus U} \sim \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left( \frac{\sqrt{\alpha'}}{R_8},-\frac{R_8}{\sqrt{\alpha'}}, i \frac{\sqrt{\alpha'}}{R_9},-i \frac{R_9}{\sqrt{\alpha'}} \right), \qquad {\cal Z}^R|_{G^{\rm v}_{\rm str} \oplus G^{\rm h}_{\rm str}} \sim \frac{\sqrt{\alpha'}}{R}\,,\] while the period integral becomes \[\Omega^{\rm norm.}|_{U \oplus U} \sim \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left( \frac{1}{\sqrt{\ln(1/\epsilon_\eta)}}, \sqrt{\ln(1/\epsilon_\eta)}, \frac{1}{\sqrt{\ln(1/\epsilon_\eta)}}, \sqrt{\ln(1/\epsilon_\eta)} \right)\,. \label{eq:degen-limit-U+U}\] for small \(\epsilon_{\eta}\) in F-theory. Hence the relation is \({\rm vol}(T^2)/\ell_s^2 \sim (R_8R_9)/\alpha' \sim \ln (1/\epsilon_\eta)\) (see e.g. Appendix B of ).[^48] Let us now study the distribution of vacua in the miniature landscape, focusing on whether the vacua are close to the stable degeneration "limit" of a K3 surface, or to the large large \({\rm vol}(T^2)/\ell_s^2\) "limit" in heterotic language. For this purpose, the volume in heterotic string theory can be defined easily and unambiguously by using the Narain moduli (see below), and we use this \([{\rm vol}(T^2)/\ell_s^2]_{\rm Het}\) as the parameter of distribution. It is then more direct and convenient to deal with the F-theory data in terms of period integrals, rather than the defining equation(s) of K3, since we use the heterotic--F-theory duality. Let us follow and consider (for simplicity and concreteness) only the case in which the gauge groups in the visible and hidden sector \(E_8\) both remain unbroken. For any attractive K3 surface \(X=X_{[a~b~c]}\) with \(T_X = \left[ \begin{array}{cc} 2a & b \\ b & 2c \end{array}\right]\) there always exists such an elliptic fibration.[^49] \(T_X \oplus T_X[-1]\) forms a sublattice of \(U \oplus U\), and \(W_{\rm frame} = E_8 \oplus E_8 \oplus T_X[-1]\). To be more explicit, let the oriented basis of \(T_X\) be \(\{q, p\}\) and \(T_X[-1] = {\rm Span}_\Z \{Q, P\}\). Then we can embed \(T_X\) and \(T_X[-1]\) primitively into \(U \oplus U = {\rm Span}_\Z \{ v, V \} \oplus {\rm Span}_\Z \{ v', V' \}\) as[^50] \[\left(p,q,P,Q \right) = \left( v, V, v', V' \right) \left( \begin{array}{cccc} 1 & &-1 & \\ a & b & a & \\ & 1 & &-1 \\ & c & b & c \\ \end{array}\right)\,.\] The period vector \(\vev{\Omega_X} = (p + \tau_X q, \bullet)\) (with \(\tau_X\) and \(Q_X\) given by \(\tau\) in ([\[eq:TX-OmegaX\]](#eq:TX-OmegaX){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:TX-OmegaX"})) is written as \[\vev{\Omega_X}|_{U \oplus U} = (v + (a+b\tau_X) V + \tau_X v' + c\tau_X V', \bullet) \Longrightarrow \vev{\Omega_X^{\rm norm.}} = \sqrt{\frac{2c}{Q_X}}((a+b \tau_X), 1, c \tau_X, \tau_X)\] in the component description of \([U \oplus U]^* \otimes \C\). This moduli data for F-theory is to be identified with \[Z: \left( \begin{array}{c} n_1 \\-w^1 \\ n_2 \\-w^2 \end{array} \right) \longrightarrow \frac{i}{\sqrt{2 ({\rm Im}\tau_H) ({\rm Im}\rho_H)}} (-\tau_H,-\rho_H, 1,-\rho_H \tau_H) \left( \begin{array}{c} n_1 \\-w^1 \\ n_2 \\-w^2 \end{array} \right)\] modulo \({\rm Isom}(U \oplus U)\). Here \(\tau_H\) is the complex structure modulus of \(T^2\) for heterotic string compactification and \(\rho_H = (B+iJ)/\ell_s^2\) is the complexified Kähler modulus of \(T^2\). With the condition ([\[eq:cond-abc\]](#eq:cond-abc){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:cond-abc"}), the best identification is \[\tau_H \leftrightarrow \tau_X, \qquad \rho_H \leftrightarrow c\tau_X\,, \qquad \tau_H \rho_H \leftrightarrow-(a+b\tau_X)\,.\] From this, we can read off that \[\left[\frac{{\rm vol}(T^2)}{\ell_s^2} = {\rm Im}(\rho_H) \right]_{\rm Het} = \left[\frac{\sqrt{Q_X}}{2} = \frac{\sqrt{4ac-b^2}}{2} \right]_F, \qquad |\rho_H| = \sqrt{ac}\,.\] Vacua parametrically close to the stable degeneration limit (i.e., parametrically large \({\rm vol}(T^2)/\ell_s^2\) for heterotic string theory) are realized when the attractive K3 surface is characterized by large \(ac\) or \(Q_X\). There is an upper limit on the value of \(a\) and \(c\), which comes from the D3-brane tadpole condition ([\[eq:G1-partflux\<=24\]](#eq:G1-partflux<=24){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:G1-partflux<=24"}). For moderate choices of \(a, b\) and \(c\), neither \(|(a+b\tau)|\) nor \(|c|\) are large, and hence the F-theory flux vacua are not attracted towards the region where the heterotic dual has a good supergravity approximation. The distribution of \([{\rm vol}(T^2)/\ell_s^2]_{\rm Het}\), and hence of \(\sqrt{Q_X}/2\) in F-theory, is determined and presented in Figure [\[fig:Het-vol-distr\]](#fig:Het-vol-distr){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:Het-vol-distr"}, using the 98 different identifications of \(S_1 \times S_2\) for M-theory in Table [3](#tab:AK-notmorethan24){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:AK-notmorethan24"} with \(X \times S = X_{[a~b~c]} \times X_{[a'~b'~c']}\) for F-theory. It is clear that only a small fraction of vacua in the tail of the distribution in Figure [\[fig:Het-vol-distr\]](#fig:Het-vol-distr){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:Het-vol-distr"} are in the moduli space of K3 surfaces \(X\) in the stable degeneration "limit", or in the large \({\rm vol}(T^2)/\ell_s^2\) region of heterotic \(E_8 \times E_8\) compactification. This distribution can be regarded as that of an ensemble of effective theories containing \(E_8 \times E_8\) 7-brane gauge groups (which are left unbroken), but it can also be regarded as that of theories with \(\SO(32)\) 7-brane gauge group.[^51] For moderate choices of a, b and c, we should not expect that \(\epsilon_K\) is small, either. In other words, all the period integrals in such a K3 surface either vanish or are of order unity. This means that there is no extra singular fibre located closely to a singular fibre supporting 7-brane non-Abelian gauge groups, like \(H^{\rm v}\) and \(H^{\rm h}\) in the visible and hidden sector. Correspondingly, the appropriate field theory local model is to take \(H^{\rm v}\) and \(H^{\rm h}\) as the gauge group everywhere [^52] on the other K3 surface \(S\). Let us now turn our attention back to the defining equation ([\[eq:Weierstrass-degen-lim\]](#eq:Weierstrass-degen-lim){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:Weierstrass-degen-lim"}) of the K3 surface. Certainly it is a better and more direct approach for a systematic search for the Noether--Lefschetz locus of \(Y\) to parametrize the moduli space by period integrals and deal with the lattices \(T_X\), \(S_X\) etc., but it is also nice if we can figure out what kind of defining equations such vacua correspond to. Precisely the same problem has been addressed by for a specific class of K3 surfaces. In the following, we provide a simplified summary of their results so it fits to the context in this article. Consider an attractive K3 surface \(X_{[2A~2B~2C]}\) (i.e., special case \(a=2A\), \(b=2B\) and \(c = 2C\)). Such a K3 surface corresponds to \({\rm Km}(E_{\rho_1} \times E_{\rho_2}) = (E_{\rho_1} \times E_{\rho_2})/\Z_2\) with \[\rho_1 = \frac{-B + i \sqrt{4AC-B^2}}{2C}, \qquad \rho_2 = \frac{-B+i\sqrt{4AC-B^2}}{2} = C \rho_1\,. \label{rho12ABC}\] \(E_{\rho_i}\) (\(i=1,2\)) is an elliptic curve with the complex structure \(\rho_i\), and we let its defining equation[^53] be \(y^2 = x(x-1)(x-\lambda_i)\). Kummer surfaces associated with a product type Abelian surface, which have \(\rho_X = 18\), are known to have at least 11 different types of elliptic fibrations. One of them (type 3 in ) has \(2{\rm IV}^*+8I_1\) type singular fibres (including two "\(E_6\)-type" fibres) in the Kodaira classification. Let us take this type of elliptic fibration as an example. Ref. found that the Weierstrass model for this type of fibration (Inose's pencil) is given by \[Y^2 = (X + 4u^2)(X+4u^2 (\lambda_1+\lambda_2)) (X + 4u^2 \lambda_1\lambda_2) + \frac{(4u^2)^3}{4} \left\{ \frac{\lambda_2(\lambda_2-1)}{u} + \lambda_1(\lambda_1-1) u \right\}^2\,, \label{eq:Inose-pencil}\] where \(u\) is the inhomogeneous coordinate on the base \(\P^1\), or equivalently, \[\tilde{Y} \left\{ \tilde{Y}-(2u)^3 \left(\frac{\lambda_2(\lambda_2-1)}{u} + \lambda_1(\lambda_1-1) u \right) \right\} = (X + 4u^2)(X+4u^2 (\lambda_1+\lambda_2)) (X + 4u^2 \lambda_1\lambda_2)\,. \label{eq:Inose-pencil-2}\] Tate's condition for a \({\rm IV}^*\) fibre is satisfied at \(u=0\) and \(u=\infty\). To turn this \(\rho_X = 18\) K3 surface into an attractive K3 surface (\(\rho_X = 20\)), we only have to make a specific choice of \(\rho_1\) and \(\rho_2\) (and hence \(\lambda_{1,2}\)) in terms of integers \(A\), \(B\) and \(C\) as in [\[rho12ABC\]](#rho12ABC){reference-type="eqref" reference="rho12ABC"}. The second equation above is already in the form of the generalized Weierstrass form (Tate form, ([\[eq:Weierstrass-degen-lim\]](#eq:Weierstrass-degen-lim){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:Weierstrass-degen-lim"})), apart from a shift in \(X\) that does not play an essential role.[^54] The defining equation of the spectral surface can be read off from the Tate form: \(a^{\rm v}_0 = a^{\rm v}_2 = 0\), and \(a^{\rm v}_3 y = 0\). Thus, in the language of the supergravity approximation of heterotic string theory, the \(\rho_X = 20\) vacua of F-theory are realized due to spectral surfaces (gauge field configurations) which are far from generic and imply an intricate conspiracy among \(f_0\), \(g_0\), \(a^{\rm v}_3\) and \(a^{\rm h}_3\). We will come back to this issue in Section [5.3](#ssec:MW-singl-fbr-flux){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:MW-singl-fbr-flux"} and Appendix [\[sec:Km-E6E6\]](#sec:Km-E6E6){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:Km-E6E6"}. # Landscapes of F-theory on \({\rm K3} \times {\rm K3}\) with \(G_0 \neq 0\) Flux {#sec:G0-flux} The study in the previous section is for a landscape with a limited choice of four-form flux; the condition ([\[eq:no-G0\]](#eq:no-G0){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:no-G0"}) has been imposed. Consequently, the number of vacua is limited and the level of complexity of the analysis remains (barely) manageable. One can maintain full control of details, if one wishes, which enables us to understand various subtleties associated with multiplicity counting and the role played by the modular group. The \(G_0=0\) assumption on the flux, however, has much to do with this advantage. Suppose that \(Y= X \times S\) for F-theory compactification is given by a pair of attractive K3 surfaces \(X\) and \(S\), as in Section [2.1](#ssec:review-AK){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:review-AK"}. The \(G_0\) type flux is then in \(S_X \otimes S_S \otimes \R\) and can be written in the form \[= \sum_{I=1}^{18} C_I \otimes F_I\, , \label{eq:G0-Wx-Ss-expansion}\] where \(\{C_I\}_{I=1,\cdots, 18}\) is chosen as a basis of \(W_{\rm root} \oplus W_{\rm {\rm U}(1)} \subset W_{\rm frame} \subset S_X\) and \(F_I \in S_S \otimes \Q \subset H^{1,1}(S; \R)\). The gauge bosons corresponding to the Cartan part of the 7-brane gauge fields remain massless for a rank-\(rk_7\) group when the \(\{F_I \}\)s span an \((18-rk_7)\)-dimensional subspace of \(H^{1,1}(S; \R)\). The rest of the Cartan gauge fields become massive through the Stückelberg mechanism. There will be \((18-rk_7)\) global \({\rm U}(1)\) symmetries left in the effective theory. Non-perturbative corrections break these symmetries, but they may still look like approximate symmetries if the non-perturbative corrections break them only weakly. Therefore it is not a complete nonsense to focus on a sub-ensemble of vacua of F-theory on \({\rm K3} \times {\rm K3}\) with \(G_{\rm tot} = G_1+G_0\) flux of a given value of \((18-rk_7)\) and to study the statistics of this sub-ensemble, as those compactifications share a common property of the resulting effective theories. In this context, the statistical results of the \(G_0= 0\) landscape in Section [4.3](#ssec:sample-stats){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:sample-stats"} are also of some value. They are regarded as the statistics in the sub-ensemble characterized by the rank \(rk_7 = 18\) massless gauge group on 7-branes and \({\cal N}=1\) supersymmetry. There is hence a physical motivation to study the statistics of the sub-landscape characterized by some properties of the \(G_0\) flux, such as \(rk_7\) (see Sections [5.3](#ssec:MW-singl-fbr-flux){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:MW-singl-fbr-flux"} and [5.4](#ssec:orientifold-beyond){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:orientifold-beyond"} for more), and also to compare the numbers of vacua that have \(G_0\) with different properties. These are the kind of problems we address in this section. ## General Remarks {#ssec:remark-G0} ### Primitivity Let us begin with a brief remark on the Kähler moduli. For supersymmetric compactifications, \(G_{\rm tot} = G_1 + G_0\) not only has to be purely of Hodge type \((2, 2)\), but also primitive: \[J_Y \wedge G_{\rm tot} = J_Y \wedge G_0 = 0\,. \label{eq:primitive-cond}\] The Kähler form \(J_Y\) on \(Y = X \times S\) has the shape \[J_Y = t_X [F_X] + J_S\, , \label{eq:Kahler-4-F-theory}\] where \(t_X \in \R_{0<}\), \([F_X]\) is the fibre class (elliptic divisor) associated with \(\pi_X: X \rightarrow \P^1\), and \(J_S\) a Kähler form on \(S\) in the positive cone of \(S_S\) (i.e., \(J_S \in S_S \otimes \R\), and \(J_S^2 > 0\)). The primitivity condition ([\[eq:primitive-cond\]](#eq:primitive-cond){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:primitive-cond"}) implies that all of the \(F_I\) (\(I = 1,\cdots, 18\)) are orthogonal to \(J_S\) in the inner product in \(S_S \otimes \R \cong H^{1,1}(S; \R)\). For a given Kähler form \(J_S\), the \(G_0\) type flux in \(W_{{\rm frame}*} \otimes [J_S^\perp \subset (S_S \otimes \R)]\) always gives rise to a positive contribution---\(1/2 [G_0] \cdot [G_0]\)---to the D3-tadpole, since both \(W_{\rm frame}\) and \([J_S^\perp \subset S_S \otimes \R]\) are negative definite.[^55] Because of the primitivity condition of the four-form flux, the complex structure moduli and Kähler moduli talk to each other. There are two equivalent ways to see how they "talk". One way is, to think of the Kähler moduli \((t_X, J_S)\) as being given first, after which the \(F_I\) describing \(G_0\) are forced to be in the subspace \([J_S^\perp \subset S_S \otimes \Q]\), as above. If the ratio of components of \(J_S\) are in \(\Q\)---this situation is denoted by \([J_S] \in \Q\P[S_S]\) in this article---then \([J_S^\perp \subset S_S \otimes \Q]\) is of dimension \[20-1=19\]. If the ratio is not just in \(\Q\), but in an extension field of \(\Q\), then the dimension of the space for \(G_0\) is smaller than 19. In the rest of this article, we assume that \(J_S \in \Q\P[S_S]\). The other way is to think of the \(F_I\) as being given first. In this case, \(J_S\) is forced to be in the subspace of \(S_S \otimes \R\) orthogonal to all of the \(F_I\) due to the D-term potential (e.g., [@Kachru:2002he; @Tripathy:2002qw]). When the \(F_I\) span a \((18-rk_7)\)-dimensional subspace of \(S_S \otimes \Q\), the remaining moduli space of \(J_S\) is of \((2+rk_7)\)-dimensions (in \(\R\)).[^56][^57] Eventually one has to think of stabilization of both complex structure moduli and Kähler moduli, so that these two perspectives are equivalent. Common to these two is the idea that the stabilization of the two groups of moduli can be dealt with separately, which is true as long as there is a separation of scales between those two stabilization mechanisms, such as in the KKLT scenario. In this article, we focus on aspects of complex structure moduli stabilization in flux compactifications, using \({\rm K3} \times {\rm K3}\) as an example. This article is not committed to a particular mechanism of Kähler moduli stabilization available on \({\rm K3} \times {\rm K3}\), except that we implicitly assume this separation of scales. It is thus impossible to determine the full landscape distribution of completely discrete vacua in the product of complex structure and Kähler moduli spaces \({\cal M}_{\rm cpx} \times {\cal M}_{\rm Kahler}\) for \({\rm K3} \times {\rm K3}\), or projections of these distributions to \({\cal M}_{\rm cpx}\), without introducing extra assumptions (on Kähler moduli stabilization). Our statements in the rest of this article are often presented in the form of distributions of flux vacua on \({\cal M}_{\rm cpx}\) for a fixed choice of Kähler moduli. ### Integrality Let us now switch the subject, and discuss the "integrality condition" on \([G_1]\) and \([G_0]\). When both \([G_1]\) and \([G_0]\) are non-zero, each one of them does not have to be integral by itself; only the total flux \([G_{\rm tot}] = [G_1] + [G_0]\) needs to be integral, i.e. an element of \(H^4(Y; \Z)\). Once we find that \([G_1]\) does not have to be integral---an element of \(T_X \otimes T_S\)---on its own, the condition ([\[eq:2dimR-in-4dimR\]](#eq:2dimR-in-4dimR){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:2dimR-in-4dimR"}) is too restrictive. Contributions to the D3-brane tadpole, \([G_1] \cdot[G_1]/2\) and \([G_0] \cdot [G_0]/2\), are not necessarily integers separately either, though their sum is always integral, when \(G_{\rm tot}\) is integral. This means that the search for pairs of attractive K3 surface in Sections [2.1](#ssec:review-AK){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:review-AK"} and [2.2](#ssec:extended-list){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:extended-list"} needs to be carried out once again for cases with \(G_0 \neq 0\). How large is the impact of this generalization ? In cases where both \(X\) and \(S\) are attractive K3 surfaces, we can decompose the \(22 \times 22\)-dimensional vector space \(H^2(X,\mathbb{R})\times H^2(S,\mathbb{R})\) into \[\begin{aligned} \, \oplus\, [(T_{X} \otimes S_{S}) \otimes \R]\, \oplus\, [(S_{X} \otimes T_{S}) \otimes \R]\, \oplus \, [(S_{X} \otimes S_{S}) \otimes \R]. \end{aligned}\] Such a decomposition is not necessarily possible with integer coefficients, not all of the elements of \(H^2(X; \Z)\) (resp. \(H^2(S; \Z)\)) can be written in the form of a sum of integral elements in \(T_X\) and \(S_X\) (resp. \(T_S\) and \(S_S\)), and not all the elements in \(H^2(X,\mathbb{Z})\times H^2(S,\mathbb{Z})\) can be written as a sum of integral elements in \[\begin{aligned} \, \oplus\, [(T_{X} \otimes S_{S}) ]\, \oplus\, [(S_{X} \otimes T_{S}) ]\, \oplus \, [(S_{X} \otimes S_{S})]. \end{aligned}\] The integrality of the total flux \([G]=[G_1] + [G_0]\), however, implies that for all the generators of \(T_X \otimes T_S\) and \(S_X \otimes S_S\), which are all integral four-cycles, the flux quanta evaluated on these cycles are integers. Hence \([G_1]\) and \([G_0]\) are contained within \((T_{X} \otimes T_{S})^* =(T_{X}^* \otimes T_{S}^*) \subset (T_{X} \otimes T_{S})\otimes \Q\) and \((S_{X} \otimes S_{S})^* =(S_{X}^* \otimes S_{S}^*) \subset (S_{X} \otimes S_{S})\otimes \Q\), respectively.[^58] In particular, it follows that \([G_1]\) should be within \(T_{X}^* \otimes T_{S}^*\), but may not necessarily be within \(T_{X} \otimes T_{S}\). In fact, there is a stronger necessary condition than this; although the projection of \(H^2(S; \Z) \subset T_S^* \oplus S_S^*\) to \(T_S^*\) for an attractive K3 surface is always surjective, the projection image of \[(H^2(S_1; \Z) \otimes H^2(S_2; \Z)) \cap [H^{4,0}(Y;\C) \oplus H^{2,2}(Y;\R) \oplus H^{0,4}(Y;\C)] \label{eq:integral-4cycle}\] to \((T_{S_1} \otimes T_{S_2})^*\), for \(Y = S_1 \times S_2\) with a pair of attractive K3 surfaces \(S_1\) and \(S_2\), is not. In order to state a condition on the image of this projection, note that, for a pair of attractive K3 surfaces \(S_1\) and \(S_2\), the transcendental lattices, Neron--Severi lattices and their dual lattices have the following properties: as Abelian groups, \[T_{S_i}^*/T_{S_i} \cong \Z_{m_i} \times \Z_{n_i}, \qquad S_{S_i}^*/S_{S_i} \cong \Z_{m_i} \times \Z_{n_i}, \qquad {}^\exists \gamma_i: T_{S_i}^*/T_{S_i} \cong S_{S_i}^*/S_{S_i} \qquad (i=1,2)\] for some positive integers \(m_i, n_i\). It then follows that \[(T_{S_1} \otimes T_{S_2})^*/(T_{S_1} \otimes T_{S_2}) \cong \Z_{m_1m_2} \times \Z_{m_1n_2} \times \Z_{n_1m_1} \times \Z_{n_1n_2}\,.\] One can prove[^59] that the image of the integral four-cycles in ([\[eq:integral-4cycle\]](#eq:integral-4cycle){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:integral-4cycle"}) has to be within the subgroup of \((T_{S_1} \otimes T_{S_2})^*\) characterized by \[{\rm LCD}(m_1,m_2)\Z_{m_1m_2} \times \cdots \times {\rm LCD}(n_1,n_2)\Z_{n_1n_2} \subset \Z_{m_1m_2} \times \cdots \times \Z_{n_1n_2}\,. \label{eq:subgroup-LCD}\] Because of this necessary condition on \([G_1]\), one can see that \([G_1]\) still has to be an integral element of \(T_X \otimes T_S\) if all the four pairs \((m_1, m_2)\), \((m_1,n_2)\), \((n_1,m_2)\) and \((n_1,n_2)\) are mutually coprime. In this case, all the possible forms of the \([G_1]\) component on a pair of attractive K3 surfaces \(X \times S = S_1 \times S_2\) remain the same as in Sections [2.1](#ssec:review-AK){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:review-AK"} and [2.2](#ssec:extended-list){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:extended-list"}. When the four pairs of integers are not coprime, however, there are more chances for the \([G_1]\) component available in the (sublattice of) the \((T_X \otimes T_S)^*\) lattice than in the \(T_X \otimes T_S\) lattice. That makes it easier to pass the D3-tadpole constraint ([\[eq:G1-partflux\<=24\]](#eq:G1-partflux<=24){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:G1-partflux<=24"}), even for a pair of attractive K3 surfaces with relatively large values of \(a, c\) and \(d, f\). Section [5.2](#ssec:rank-16){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:rank-16"} is devoted to an explicit enumerative study in order to see more of the consequences of this possibility of non-integral choice of \(G_1\). ### \(\vev{W_{\rm GVW}} = 0\) When we write the \([G_1]\) component as \(G_1 = {\rm Re} [\gamma \Omega_{S_1} \wedge \overline{\Omega}_{S_2}]\), as in or in ([\[eq:G1-gamma-def\]](#eq:G1-gamma-def){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:G1-gamma-def"}), it manifestly has only a \((2,2)\) Hodge component, without \((4,0)\) or \((0,4)\) component. However, we may also ask what is the statistical cost of requiring the absence of the \((4,0)+(0,4)\) components, or equivalently, a vanishingly small cosmological constant. For this purpose, the \(G_0\) component is irrelevant and \([G_1] \in (T_{S_1} \otimes T_{S_2}) \otimes \Q\), which we can write as: \[= k_1 (p_1 \otimes p_2) + k_2 (p_1 \otimes q_2) + k_3 (q_1 \otimes p_2) + k_4 (q_1 \otimes q_2)\,,\] where \(k_1, k_2, k_3, k_4 \in \Q\) are not necessarily integers. The \((4,0)\) and \((0,4)\) Hodge components of \([G_1]\) are \[\frac{\bar{\tau}_1 \bar{\tau}_2 k_1-\bar{\tau}_1 k_2-\bar{\tau}_2 k_3 + k_4} {(\bar{\tau}_1-\tau_1)(\bar{\tau}_2-\tau_2)} \; \Omega_{S_1} \wedge \Omega_{S_2} + \frac{\tau_1 \tau_2 k_1-\tau_1 k_2-\tau_2 k_3 + k_4} {(\bar{\tau}_1-\tau_1)(\bar{\tau}_2-\tau_2)} \; \overline{\Omega}_{S_1} \wedge \overline{\Omega}_{S_2}\,. \label{eq:40-04-components}\] Thus, the absence of the \((4,0)+(0,4)\) component is equivalent to the condition that either \((\tau_1\tau_2)\), \(\tau_1\), \(\tau_2\) and \(1\) are not linear independent over the field \(\Q\), or all of \(k_{1,2,3,4}\) vanish (and \(G_1 = 0\)). For an arbitrary pair of attractive K3 surfaces \(S_1\) and \(S_2\), the period integrals take their values in \(\Q[\tau_1, \tau_2]\), which is a degree \({\cal D}=4\) algebraic extension field over \(\Q\). The condition for this pair \(S_1\) and \(S_2\) to admit a flux with vanishing cosmological constant[^60] (while \(G_1 \neq 0\)), however, has turned out to be that \(\tau_2\) is already contained in \(\Q[\tau_1]\), and \(\Q[\tau_1, \tau_2]\) is a degree \({\cal D} = 2\) extension field of \(\Q\). The condition ([\[eq:square-integer\]](#eq:square-integer){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:square-integer"}) is for \(\vev{W} = 0\), for a general non-vanishing \([G_1]\) in \((T_X \otimes T_S) \otimes \Q\), rather than just for an integral \([G_1] \in (T_X \otimes T_S)\). ## A Landscape of Vacua with a Rank-16 7-brane Gauge Group {#ssec:rank-16} Just like the \(G_0 = 0\) landscape in Section [4.3](#ssec:sample-stats){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:sample-stats"}, which is interpreted as the ensemble of vacua with rank-18 massless gauge fields on 7-branes, let us also consider the ensemble of F-theory compactifications on \({\rm K3} \times {\rm K3}\) with rank-16 massless gauge fields on 7-branes. This is realized by allowing a \(G_0 \neq 0\) with only two terms non-zero in the expansion ([\[eq:G0-Wx-Ss-expansion\]](#eq:G0-Wx-Ss-expansion){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:G0-Wx-Ss-expansion"}). With this study, we hope to elucidate various aspects of the landscape involving \(G_0 \neq 0\). In the context of F-theory, there is not particular importance to the specific choice of having just two terms in ([\[eq:G0-Wx-Ss-expansion\]](#eq:G0-Wx-Ss-expansion){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:G0-Wx-Ss-expansion"}), or equivalently \(rk_7 = 16\). However, this choice makes it easier to link the present discussion to earlier results on type IIB orientifold landscapes, as discussed in Section [5.4](#ssec:orientifold-beyond){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:orientifold-beyond"}. Suppose that \(G_0 \neq 0\) flux is introduced by using some \(C_{I=1}\) and \(C_{I=2}\) in ([\[eq:G0-Wx-Ss-expansion\]](#eq:G0-Wx-Ss-expansion){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:G0-Wx-Ss-expansion"}), where \(C_{I=1,2}\) are elements of the frame lattice \(W_{\rm frame}(X_{[a~b~c]})\) of some attractive K3 surface \(X_{[a~b~c]}\). Then the gauge fields along the direction of \(C_{I=1,2}\) become massive, and only the gauge fields within \([\{C_{I=1,2}\}^\perp \subset W_{\rm frame}]\) remain massless. Since it is motivated from the perspective of physics to collect vacua with a given unbroken gauge group, it will be interesting to consider, for a given rank-\(16 = rk_7\) lattice \(W_{\rm unbroken}\), the vacuum ensemble associated with \[\begin{aligned} && \left\{\left(W_{\rm frame}, \{C_{I=1,2} \} \right) \; | \; W_{\rm frame} \in \amalg_{ X_{[a~b~c]} \in {\rm Isom}(\Lambda_{\rm K3}) \backslash D_{\rho=20}} {\cal J}_2(X_{[a~b~c]}), \right. \\ && \qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad \left. \; C_{I=1,2} \in W_{\rm frame}, \; [\{C_{1,2}\}^\perp \subset W_{\rm frame}] = W_{\rm unbroken} \right\}\,. \nonumber \end{aligned}\] For this reason, it also makes sense to use the notation \(W_{\rm noscan}\) instead of \(W_{\rm unbroken}\). These two are used interchangeably in Section [5.2](#ssec:rank-16){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:rank-16"}, but they are distinguished in Section [5.4](#ssec:orientifold-beyond){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:orientifold-beyond"}. If we are to take the rank-16 lattice to be e.g. \(W_{\rm unbroken} = E_8 \oplus E_8\) or \(D_{16}; \Z_2\vev{\bf sp}\), then for all the attractive K3 surfaces \(X\), there is an embedding[^61] of the transcendental lattice \(T_X\), the hyperbolic plane lattice \(U_{*} \cong {\rm Span}_\Z\{[F_X], \sigma\}\) associated with elliptic fibration, and \(W_{\rm unbroken}\) (which is an even unimodular lattice of signature \((0,16)\)) into the cohomology lattice \(\Lambda_{\rm K3}^{(X)}\): \[U_* \oplus \left(T_X \oplus T_X[-1] \right) \oplus W_{\rm unbroken} \hookrightarrow U_* \oplus \left( U \oplus U \right) \oplus W_{\rm unbroken} \cong \Lambda_{\rm K3}^{(X)}\,. \label{eq:TxTx[-]-into-UU}\] The Neron--Severi lattice is \(S_X \cong U_* \oplus T_X[-1] \oplus W_{\rm unbroken}\), and the frame lattice is \(W_{\rm frame} \cong T_X[-1] \oplus W_{\rm unbroken}\). Hence we choose the generators of the rank-2 lattice \(T_X[-1] = [W_{\rm unbroken}^\perp \subset W_{\rm frame}]\) as \(\{C_{I=1,2} \}\). As another example of \(W_{\rm unbroken}\), one can also think of \((D_4 \oplus D_4 \oplus D_4 \oplus D_4); (\Z_2 \times \Z_2)\), in which case a type IIB orientifold interpretation is given. It is known that there is an embedding[^62] \[\left(U[2] \oplus U[2]\right) \oplus (U_* \oplus W_{\rm unbroken}) \hookrightarrow \Lambda_{\rm K3}^{(X)}\,.\] Furthermore, it is known that for attractive K3 surfaces \(X_{[a~b~c]}\) with \(a,b,c\) even, there is an embedding \(T_X \oplus T_X[-1] \hookrightarrow U[2] \oplus U[2]\) (). Thus, \(W_{\rm frame} \cong T_X[-1] \oplus W_{\rm unbroken}\), and the generators of the rank-2 lattice \(T_X[-1] = [W_{\rm unbroken}^\perp \subset W_{\rm frame}]\) are chosen as \(\{C_{I=1,2}\}\)s. Hence all the attractive K3 surfaces with even \(a,b,c\) contribute to the ensemble of vacua characterized by \(W_{\rm unbroken} \cong (D_4^{\oplus 4}); (\Z_2 \times \Z_2)\). Let \(T_S\) be the transcendental lattice of the attractive K3 surface \(S\). Modulo \({\rm Isom}(\Lambda_{\rm K3}^{(S)})\), it is always possible to embed \(T_S\) into \(\Lambda_{\rm K3}^{(S)}\) as \[T_S \hookrightarrow (T_S \oplus T_S[-1]) \hookrightarrow (U \oplus U) \oplus U \oplus E_8 \oplus E_8 \cong \Lambda_{\rm K3}^{(S)}\,. \label{eq:TsTs[-]-into-UU}\] This is not only always possible, but also unique in that any embedding to \(\Lambda_{\rm K3}^{(S)} \cong {\rm II}_{3,19}\) (not to \({\rm II}_{2,18}\)) can be brought in the form above modulo \({\rm Isom}(\Lambda_{\rm K3}^{(S)})\) . Thus, \(S_S \cong T_S[-1] \oplus U \oplus E_8 \oplus E_8\). Therefore, the flux \(G_{\rm tot} = G_1 + G_0\) is introduced to the space[^63] \[\left[ (T_X \otimes T_S)^* \oplus (T_X[-1] \otimes (T_S[-1] \oplus U \oplus E_8 \oplus E_8))^* \right] \cap H^2(X; \Z) \otimes H^2(S; \Z)\,. \label{eq:tot-flux-options}\] Now, let us take the case \(W_{\rm unbroken} = E_8 \oplus E_8\) as an example, and work out the details. In order to avoid inessential complexity, we restrict our attention to \(Y=X \times S\) of the form \(X_{[a~b~c]} \times X_{[a'~b'~c']}\) with \(b=b'=0\). Embeddings of ([\[eq:TxTx\[-\]-into-UU\]](#eq:TxTx[-]-into-UU){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:TxTx[-]-into-UU"}, [\[eq:TsTs\[-\]-into-UU\]](#eq:TsTs[-]-into-UU){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:TsTs[-]-into-UU"}) are given by[^64] \[\begin{aligned} (p_1, P_1, q_1, Q_1) & = & (v_1, V_1, v'_1, V'_1) \left(\begin{array}{cccc} 1 &-1 & & \\ a & a & & \\ & & 1 &-1 \\ & & c & c \end{array}\right)\,, \\ (p_2, P_2, q_2, Q_2) & = & (v_2, V_2, v'_2, V'_2) \left(\begin{array}{cccc} 1 &-1 & & \\ a' & a' & & \\ & & 1 &-1 \\ & & c' & c' \end{array}\right)\,, \end{aligned}\] where \(\{p_1, q_1\}\) (resp. \(\{p_2, q_2\}\)) are generators of \(T_X\) (resp. \(T_S\)), and \(\{P_1, Q_1\}\) (resp. \(\{P_2, Q_2\}\)) are generators of \(T_X[-1]\) (resp. \(T_S[-1]\)). The \((U \oplus U)\) sublattice of \(\Lambda_{\rm K3}^{(X)}\) is generated by \(\{v_1, V_1\}\) and \(\{v'_1, V'_1\}\), and that of \(\Lambda_{\rm K3}^{(S)}\) by \(\{v_2, V_2\}\) and \(\{v'_2, V'_2\}\). The intersection forms on the \(U\)s are given by \((v,v) = (V, V) = 0\) and \((v, V) = (V,v) = 1\). It is now straightforward to enumerate the flux \(G_{\rm tot} = G_1 + G_0\) in ([\[eq:tot-flux-options\]](#eq:tot-flux-options){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:tot-flux-options"}), using the basis give above: \[\begin{aligned} G_1 & = & \frac{n_{11}{\rm GCD}(a,a')+m_{11}}{2{\rm GCD}(a,a')}(p_1 \otimes p_2)+ \frac{n_{22}{\rm GCD}(c,c')+m_{22}}{2{\rm GCD}(c,c')}(q_1 \otimes q_2) \nonumber \\ & & \quad + \frac{n_{12}{\rm GCD}(a,c')+m_{12}}{2{\rm GCD}(a,c')}(p_1 \otimes q_2)+ \frac{n_{21}{\rm GCD}(c,a')+m_{21}}{2{\rm GCD}(c,a')}(q_1 \otimes p_2), \label{eq:G1-nm-parametrized} \\ G_0 & = & \frac{n_{11}{\rm GCD}(a,a')-m_{11}}{2{\rm GCD}(a,a')}(P_1 \otimes P_2)+ \frac{n_{22}{\rm GCD}(c,c')-m_{22}}{2{\rm GCD}(c,c')}(Q_1 \otimes Q_2) + (P_1 \otimes F_P) + (Q_1 \otimes F_Q) \nonumber \\ & & \quad + \frac{n_{12}{\rm GCD}(a,c')-m_{12}}{2{\rm GCD}(a,c')}(P_1 \otimes Q_2)+ \frac{n_{21}{\rm GCD}(c,a')-m_{21}}{2{\rm GCD}(c,a')}(Q_1 \otimes P_2), \label{eq:G0-nm-parametrized} \\ G_{\rm tot} & = & n_{11} (v_1 \otimes v_2 + aa' V_1 \otimes V_2) + m_{11} \frac{a' v_1 \otimes V_2 + a V_1 \otimes v_2}{{\rm GCD}(a,a')} + \cdots + (P_1 \otimes F_P) + (Q_1 \otimes F_Q)\,. \end{aligned}\] Here, \(n_{11}, m_{11}, \cdots, n_{22}, m_{22}\) are integers and \(F_P, F_Q \in U \oplus E_8 \oplus E_8 \subset \Lambda_{\rm K3}^{(S)}\). The denominators \({\rm GCD}(2a, 2a')\), \({\rm GCD}(2c, 2c')\) etc. in ([\[eq:G1-nm-parametrized\]](#eq:G1-nm-parametrized){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:G1-nm-parametrized"}, [\[eq:G0-nm-parametrized\]](#eq:G0-nm-parametrized){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:G0-nm-parametrized"}) correspond to our earlier discussion around ([\[eq:subgroup-LCD\]](#eq:subgroup-LCD){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:subgroup-LCD"}). \(G_1\) and \(G_0\) are not necessarily integral separately, but \(G_{\rm tot}\) is. At this moment, it is not guaranteed that the \((4,0)+(0,4)\) Hodge components vanish. After imposing the \(\vev{W}=0\) condition, one is left with the following cases - \({\cal D} := \dim_\Q \Q[\tau_1, \tau_2] = 2\), i.e., the condition ([\[eq:square-integer\]](#eq:square-integer){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:square-integer"}) is satisfied when \(G_1 \neq 0\) and there are \((8-{\cal D})=6\) independent integers out of \(\{n_{11}, \cdots, m_{22}\}\), in addition to \(F_P, F_Q\). In this case there are \({\cal D} = 2\) less scanning integers just like in Sections [2.1](#ssec:review-AK){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:review-AK"}, [2.2](#ssec:extended-list){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:extended-list"} and . - \({\cal D} = 4\), when \(G_1 = 0\), and there are \((8-{\cal D})=4\) independent integers as well as \(F_P, F_Q\) (the "second branch" in §5 of ). The latter ii) cases leave 16 moduli of \(X\) and 18 of \(S\) unstabilized, and we restrict our attention only to the cases i) ,as did, in the following. Note, however, that the Kähler form and the primitivity condition on the flux has been ignored completely in the argument above. The Kähler form \(J_S\) on \(S\) needs to be introduced in the positive definite part of \([T_S^\perp \subset \Lambda_{\rm K3}] \otimes \R\), and the flux \(G_0\) component has to be orthogonal to this \(J_S\). We provide the following presentation for a fixed choice of \(J_S\) (rather than scanning over all possible \(J_S\)), and in particular, we choose \[J_S = t_S (v''_2 + V''_2)\,, \label{eq:assume-Js}\] where \(v''_2\) and \(V''_2\) are the generators of the third copy of the hyperbolic plane lattice \(U\) in \(\Lambda_{\rm K3}^{(S)}\) in ([\[eq:TsTs\[-\]-into-UU\]](#eq:TsTs[-]-into-UU){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:TsTs[-]-into-UU"}), so that the computation becomes as easy as possible. This means that the primitivity condition does not impose a constraint on the integers \(\{n_{11}, \cdots, m_{22}\}\), and \(F_P, F_Q\) are chosen from the negative definite lattice \((-2) \oplus E_8 \oplus E_8\). Here, \((-2)\) is the lattice generated by \((v''_2-V''_2)\), where \((v''_2-V''_2)^2 =-2\). Assuming that \(W_{\rm unbroken} = E_8 \oplus E_8\) (or \(D_{16}; \Z_2\vev{\bf sp}\)), we scan all possible pairs of attractive K3 surfaces of the form \(X_{[a~0~c]} \times X_{[a'~0~c']}\) and list up all the possible fluxes ([\[eq:G1-nm-parametrized\]](#eq:G1-nm-parametrized){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:G1-nm-parametrized"}, [\[eq:G0-nm-parametrized\]](#eq:G0-nm-parametrized){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:G0-nm-parametrized"}) satisfying (i) the condition that \(\vev{W}=0\), (ii) the primitivity condition with respect to the Kähler form ([\[eq:assume-Js\]](#eq:assume-Js){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:assume-Js"}) and (iii) the D3-tadpole condition \[\frac{1}{2} G_{\rm tot} \cdot G_{\rm tot} \leq \frac{\chi(X \times S)}{24} = 24\, ; \label{eq:total-tadpole-<=24}\] the remaining D3-brane charge is supplied by placing an appropriate number of D3-branes. Scanning within the range of \(0<c\leq a \leq 50\) and \(0<c' \leq a' \leq 50\) for \(Y = X \times S = X_{[a~0~c]} \times X_{[a'~0~c']}\), we found that there are 313 different choices of \(X \times S\) admitting the flux satisfying all the three conditions above. The distribution of the value of \(a\) in these 313 choices are shown in Figure [\[fig:a-distr\]](#fig:a-distr){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:a-distr"}. If both \(G_1\) and \(G_0\) were required to be integral, there would only be 28 different choices,[^65] and the largest possible value of \(a\) would be 6. Figure [\[fig:vsA\]](#fig:vsA){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:vsA"} shows the correlation among moduli parameters for the 313 pairs of attractive K3 surfaces admitting a flux satisfying all the three conditions above. For the first two scatter plots (i) and (ii) of Figure [\[fig:vsA\]](#fig:vsA){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:vsA"}, we can see clear correlations. When \(a\) is very large, there is presumably not much freedom to choose \(a'\) other than setting it to be comparable to \(a\) itself (see (ii)), so that \({\rm GCD}(a,a')\) is large, and the D3-tadpole contribution remains below the bound. On the other hand, there is no clear correlation to be read out from the plot (iii), we will have a comment on this in Section [5.4](#ssec:orientifold-beyond){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:orientifold-beyond"}. There is a tremendous amount of combined choices of \(X \times S = X_{[a~0~c]} \times X_{[a'~0~c']}\) and the fluxes on it. We found about \(795 \times 10^{15}\) choices satisfying all the three conditions on the flux by naively scanning \(\{n_{ij}, m_{ij}, F_P, F_Q \}\) (apart from identification \(\{n_{ij}, m_{ij}, F_P, F_Q \} \longleftrightarrow (-1) \times \{n_{ij}, m_{ij}, F_P, F_Q\}\)). This large ensemble is dominated by the flux choices on a very small group of possibilities of \(X_{[a~0~c]} \times X_{[a'~0~c']}\). There are about \(777 \times 10^{15}\) choices of flux for \(X_{[1~0~1]} \times X_{[1~0~1]}\), 98% of the ensemble. Almost 99.6% of the ensemble is accounted for when we combine all the flux choices on \(X_{[1~0~1]} \times X_{[1~0~1]}\), \(X_{[2~0~1]} \times X_{[2~0~1]}\), \(X_{[2~0~2]} \times X_{[1~0~1]}\), \(X_{[1~0~1]} \times X_{[2~0~2]}\) and \(X_{[2~0~2]} \times X_{[2~0~2]}\). It is a fluke, though, that the statistics is dominated by a small number of pairs of attractive K3 surfaces. The large number of flux choices for \(X_{[a~0~c]} \times X_{[a'~0~c']}\) with small values of \(a,c,a',c'\) is primarily due to[^66] \(F_P, F_Q\) in \((-2) \oplus E_8 \oplus E_8 \subset \Lambda_{\rm K3}^{(S)}\). It is possible for such pairs of K3 surfaces to find a flux \((G_1 + G_0)\) on \((T_X \oplus T_X[-1]) \otimes (T_S \oplus T_S[-1])\) so that the contribution to the D3-tadpole is much smaller than 24. There is a lot of room left in the tadpole condition for an extra \(G_0\)-type flux in \(T_X[-1] \otimes ((-2) \oplus E_8 \oplus E_8)\). It should be remembered that we should take a quotient of flux configurations on \(X \times S = X_{[a~0~c]} \times X_{[a'~0~c']}\) (and elliptic fibration morphisms) by the subgroup of \(\Gamma\) that fixes the embeddings of \(U_* \oplus T_X\) and \(T_S\) in ([\[eq:TxTx\[-\]-into-UU\]](#eq:TxTx[-]-into-UU){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:TxTx[-]-into-UU"}, [\[eq:TsTs\[-\]-into-UU\]](#eq:TsTs[-]-into-UU){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:TsTs[-]-into-UU"}) and \(J_S\) in ([\[eq:assume-Js\]](#eq:assume-Js){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:assume-Js"}). Included in this stabilizer subgroup is \(W_{E_8} \times W_{E_8}\), the Weyl group of \(E_8 \oplus E_8 \subset \Lambda_{\rm K3}^{(S)}\). The Weyl group \(W_{E_8}\) acts on the 240 roots transitively. We have also confirmed that the norm \((-4)\), \((-6)\), \((-10)\) and \((-12)\) points form single orbits of \(W_{E_8}\) on their own. There are at most two \(W_{E_8}\) orbits in the norm \((-8)\) points, norm \((-14)\) points and also in the norm \((-16)\) points.[^67] Thus, it is not a particularly bad estimate (for the counting of inequivalent flux vacuum) to assume that all the norm \((-2m)\) points in the \(E_8\) root lattice form a single orbit of \(W_{E_8}\) for relatively small \(m\) such as \(m \leq 12\), which is the range that matters under the tadpole condition ([\[eq:total-tadpole-\<=24\]](#eq:total-tadpole-<=24){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:total-tadpole-<=24"}). With this crude approximation of the modular group \(\Gamma\) action on fluxes, the total number of "inequivalent" choices of \(X \times S = X_{[a~0~c]} \times X_{[a'~0~c']}\) and fluxes \(G_{\rm tot}\) combined is reduced to about \(7 \times 10^6\). About 80% of this ensemble of "inequivalent" vacua still come from fluxes on \(X \times S = X_{[1~0~1]} \times X_{[1~0~1]}\), and the totality of the flux choices on the five \(X \times S\) mentioned above (those with small \(a,c,a',c'\)) account for 92%. Although the precise percentage values should not be taken too seriously because of the crude estimate of the modular group action (and artificial choice of \(J_S\)), it is trustable at the qualitative level that the vacuum statistics of \({\rm K3} \times {\rm K3}\) compactifications of F-theory with a \(rk_7 = 16\) 7-brane gauge group \(W_{\rm unbroken}\) is dominated by a small number of \(X\times S = X_{[a~b~c]} \times X_{[a'~b'~c']}\) which have small values of \(a,c,a',c'\) so that the minimum possible value of \(G_{\rm tot}^2/2\) is small. Consequently, the distribution of any observables/moduli parameters (such as \({\rm Im}(\rho_H) = \sqrt{ac}\)) is determined simply by that of \(X \times S = X_{[1~0~1]} \times X_{[1~0~1]}\) and a few others. Before closing this section, it is worthwhile to mention that non-zero flux \(G_{\rm tot} = G_1 + G_0\) does not imply that all the 18 + 20 complex structure moduli in \({\cal M}_{{\rm K3};F}^{(X)} \times {\cal M}_{{\rm K3}}^{(S)}\) are stabilized. The mass matrix (quadratic part of the superpotential) can be written in the form of \[\propto \frac{1}{2} \left( \delta \Pi^{(1)}, \delta \Pi^{(2)} \right) \left( \begin{array}{cc} -{\rm Im}(\tau_2)\sqrt{Q_2} \gamma & \left. C_I \right) \otimes \left( F_I \right. \\ \left. F_I \right) \otimes \left( C_I \right. & -{\rm Im}(\tau_1)\sqrt{Q_1} \overline{\gamma} \end{array} \right) \left( \begin{array}{c} \delta \Pi^{(1)} \\ \delta \Pi^{(2)} \end{array} \right)\, ,\] where \(\delta \Pi^{(X)}\) has 18 components on \(W_{\rm frame}\) and \(\delta \Pi^{(S)}\) 20 components on \(S_S\). Mass terms in the diagonal block are from ([\[eq:flux-eff-super\]](#eq:flux-eff-super){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:flux-eff-super"}), while the off-diagonal block is due to the \(G_0\) type flux. All the moduli would have non-zero masses if \(G_1 \neq 0\) and \(G_0\) were absent (and similarly, full rank \(G_0\) type flux with \(rk_7 = 0\) and vanishing \(G_1\) would stabilize all but two complex structure moduli). When both are present, however, the diagonal masses from \(G_1\) and off-diagonal masses from \(G_0\) interfere and there may be a zero mass-eigenvalue (and an unstabilized direction of the moduli space) in principle. One example is to choose \(n_{ij}=0\), \(m_{11}=m_{12}=m_{22}=-m_{21}=1\) and \(F_P = F_Q = 0\) in ([\[eq:G1-nm-parametrized\]](#eq:G1-nm-parametrized){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:G1-nm-parametrized"}, [\[eq:G0-nm-parametrized\]](#eq:G0-nm-parametrized){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:G0-nm-parametrized"}) for a series of infinite pairs of attractive K3 surfaces \(X \times S = X_{[k~0~k]} \times X_{[k~0~k]}\) (where \(k=1,2 \cdots, \infty\)). Under this choice of the flux, a one parameter (\(k\)) deformation of the complex structure \(\Omega_X \wedge \Omega_S = [(v_1 + k V_1)+i(v'_1+kV'_1)] \otimes [(v_2 + k V_2)+i(v'_2+kV'_2)]\) remains a flat direction, and all the \(\rho_X = \rho_S = 20\) points \(X_{[k~0~k]} \times X_{[k~0~k]}\) just sit in this flat direction. Such flux vacua with an unstabilized direction have been removed from the vacuum ensemble studied in this section. To be more precise, our numerical code examined the \(4 \times 4\) mass matrix on \(P_1 \delta \Pi^{(1)}_{P_1} + Q_1 \delta\Pi^{(1)}_{Q_1}\) and \(P_2 \delta \Pi^{(2)}_{P_2} + Q_2 \delta \Pi^{(2)}_{Q_2}\), and threw away all the flux configurations for which there is a zero eigenvalue in this mass matrix. Certainly, one should examine the eigenvalues of a \((18+20) \times (18 + 20)\) mass matrix for each flux configuration,[^68] but we believe that our short-cut approach does not qualitatively distort the distribution of observables in the landscape. ## \({\rm U}(1)\) Flux, Heterotic--F-theory Duality, and GUT 7-brane Flux {#ssec:MW-singl-fbr-flux} The unbroken symmetry \(W_{\rm unbroken}\) of interest for a sub-ensemble of vacua can be chosen at one's will. We can choose it to be rank-18 as in Sections [2.1](#ssec:review-AK){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:review-AK"}, [2.2](#ssec:extended-list){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:extended-list"} and [4.3](#ssec:sample-stats){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:sample-stats"}, or to be rank-16 as in Section [5.2](#ssec:rank-16){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:rank-16"}, but other choices such as \(W_{\rm unbroken} \cong A_4\), a \(\SU(5)_{\rm GUT}\) landscape, are just as appropriate. Studies such as the one in Section [5.2](#ssec:rank-16){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:rank-16"} are dedicated to a landscape of vacua of individual choices of \(W_{\rm unbroken}\), which we call the \(W_{\rm unbroken}\) landscape. Beyond such an analysis, however, it is natural to ask such questions as how properties of the algebraic information \(W_{\rm unbroken}\) generally characterize distributions within the \(W_{\rm unbroken}\)-landscape, or how the number of vacua in the \(W_{\rm unbroken}\)-landscape depends on \(W_{\rm unbroken}\). As a preparation for such a discussion in Section [5.4](#ssec:orientifold-beyond){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:orientifold-beyond"}, we make a few remarks in this Section. When we write down the \(G_0\) type flux in the form ([\[eq:G0-Wx-Ss-expansion\]](#eq:G0-Wx-Ss-expansion){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:G0-Wx-Ss-expansion"}), we can take the generators \(\{C_I \}_{I=1,\cdots, 18}\) of \(W_{{\rm frame}*}\) to be such that some are from \(W_{{\rm U}(1)}\), and others from \(W_{\rm root}\). We call the \(G_0\) flux with \(C_I\) from \(W_{\rm U(1)}\) a \({\rm U}(1)\) flux or Mordell--Weil flux, and that with \(C_I\) from \(W_{\rm root}\) a GUT-brane flux or singular fibre flux. The GUT 7-brane flux corresponds to the line bundles introduced on GUT 7-branes in F-theory (such as those in ), or line bundles on a stack of multiple D7-branes in type IIB Calabi--Yau orientifolds. The \({\rm U}(1)\) flux requires a special choice of complex structure so that there is a non-vertical *algebraic* cycle, meaning that the Mordell--Weil group is non-trivial; the unavoidable tuning of complex structure is an expression equivalent to moduli stabilization. ### \({\rm U}(1)\) flux/Mordell--Weil flux Let us first ask what the \({\rm U}(1)\) flux looks like in the light of the duality between F-theory and heterotic string theory. As discussed in the literature (such as ), there must be a component of four-form \({\rm U}(1)\) flux in F-theory whose origin in heterotic string is a flux on the spectral surface. Suppose that \(\pi_Z: Z = T^2 \times S \longrightarrow S\) is the elliptically fibred Calabi--Yau threefold for the dual heterotic string compactification, and \((C, {\cal N})\) the spectral data describing the vector bundle on \(Z\). The spectral surface \(C\) is a subspace of \(Z = {\rm Jac}(T^2) \times S\) characterized by the zero points of the elliptic functions \[a^{\rm v}_0 + a^{\rm v}_2 x + a^{\rm v}_3 y + \cdots = 0, \qquad a^{\rm h}_0 + a^{\rm h}_2 x + \cdots = 0 \label{eq:Het-spec-surf}\] on \(T^2\), and \({\cal N} = {\cal O}_C(\gamma)\) is a line bundle on \(C\) specified by a divisor \(\gamma\) on \(C\). *For any complex structure* of \(Z\), \(S\) and \(C\), one can always find a divisor \[\gamma_{\rm FMW} \propto (n \sigma-\pi_C^*(n K_S + \eta))\, , \label{eq:FMW-flux}\] where \(\pi_C = \pi_Z|_C\), \(\eta\) is a divisor on \(S\), \(K_S\) the canonical divisor of \(S\), and we assume \(\SU(n) \subset E_8^{\rm vis}\) is the structure group of the vector bundle. None of the \({\rm U}(1)\) fluxes we talk about here, however, should correspond to this Friedman--Morgan--Witten flux in the heterotic "dual". If this flux were to be dual to the \({\rm U}(1)\) flux in F-theory, we would run into a contradiction immediately: an arbitrary complex structure is allowed on the heterotic side, while it has to be tuned in F-theory. In fact, the generic Friedman--Morgan--Witten flux ([\[eq:FMW-flux\]](#eq:FMW-flux){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:FMW-flux"}) always vanishes, \(\gamma = 0\), when the dual F-theory is a \({\rm K3} \times {\rm K3}\) compactification. For finely tuned complex structure of the heterotic string compactification data, \((Z, S, C)\), however, there is more variety in the choice of \(\gamma\) on the spectral surface. Suppose that the base K3 surface \(S\) is not the general complex analytic one, but has Picard number \(\rho_S \geq 2\). This means that we might be able to find a set of \(\{F_A \} \subset [J_S^\perp \subset S_S]\) generating a rank-\(k\) sublattice of \(S_S\). We only consider vector bundles with the structure group contained in \(G^{\rm v}_{\rm str} \times G^{\rm h}_{\rm str} = \SU(N_v) \times \SU(N_h)\). It then appears that we can think of a vector bundle for compactification, \[V = \oplus_{i=1}^{N_v + N_h} {\cal O}_S(D_i) \otimes {\cal O}_{T^2}(p_i-e), \qquad \qquad D_i = \sum_A n^A_{(i)} F_A\,, \label{eq:Het-bndl-NvNh}\] where the \(\{p_i\}\) and \(e\) are the zeros and the pole, respectively, of the elliptic functions ([\[eq:Het-spec-surf\]](#eq:Het-spec-surf){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:Het-spec-surf"}). The spectral surface is of the form \(C = \cup_i C_{p_i}\) with \(C_{p_i} \simeq S\)'s corresponding to \(p_i \in {\rm Jac}(T^2)\), and \(\gamma|_{C_{p_i}} = D_i\). This vector bundle is poly-stable with respect to the Kähler form \(J_Z = J_{T^2} + J_S\). The unbroken symmetry should be \(E_{9-N_v}^{\rm v} \times E_{9-N_h}^{\rm h}\) within \(E_8 \times E_8\). Moduli parameters include \(\rho_H\) and \(\tau_H\) of \(T^2\), and \((N_v-1) + (N_h-1)\) parameters of the flat bundles in ([\[eq:Het-spec-surf\]](#eq:Het-spec-surf){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:Het-spec-surf"}), and hence,in addition to those from the base \(S\), there are \(N_v + N_h\) of them. Dual to this heterotic string compactification should be F-theory on \(Y = X \times S\) where the elliptically fibred K3 surface \(X\) has the following Neron--Severi and transcendental lattices:[^69] \[\Lambda_{\rm K3}^{(X)} \supset S_X \oplus T_X = \left[ U_* \oplus E_{9-N_v} \oplus E_{9-N_h} \right] \oplus \left[ U \oplus U \oplus A_{N_v-1} \oplus A_{N_h-1}\right]\,.\] K3 surfaces \(X\) of this form have Picard number \(\rho_X = (20-N_v-N_h)\), so that the moduli space has dimension \((N_v+N_h)\), which agrees with the counting above. If we are to find a four-form flux in F-theory dual to \(\gamma\), that dual flux must be associated with non-\(U_*\) cycles that are orthogonal to the unbroken symmetry part \(E_{9-N_v} \oplus E_{9-N_h}\). This means that the flux is not in an algebraic cycle, and such a configuration is not stable. The complex structure moduli dynamically tune themselves (due to the GVW potential) so that the associated cycle becomes algebraic. In order to introduce \(k\) independent \({\rm U}(1)\) fluxes in ([\[eq:G0-Wx-Ss-expansion\]](#eq:G0-Wx-Ss-expansion){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:G0-Wx-Ss-expansion"}), the number of unstabilized directions in the moduli space should be reduced by \(k\), and the moduli space becomes \((N_v+N_h-k)\)-dimensional.[^70] This reduction of the moduli space should also be understandable in the heterotic string description. Certainly \(V\) in ([\[eq:Het-bndl-NvNh\]](#eq:Het-bndl-NvNh){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:Het-bndl-NvNh"}) is a holomorphic vector bundle and satisfies the condition \(\int J \wedge J \wedge F = 0\) as well as the Bianchi identity of the \(B\)-field, \[0 = \tr_{\mathfrak{so}(6)} \left[ \left(\frac{R}{2\pi}\right)^2 \right] -T_R^{-1}\tr {}_R \left[ \left(\frac{F}{2\pi}\right)^2 \right] + 4 \delta^{(4)}_{M5} = 4 \left(-c_2(TZ)-{\rm ch}_2(V) + \delta^{(4)}_{M5} \right)\,, \label{eq:B6-Bianchi-Het}\] where \(\delta^{(4)}_{M5}\) is the delta-function valued four-form associated with individual M5-branes wrapped on holomorphic curves in \(Z = T^2 \times S\), and \({\rm ch}_2(V)\) is the second Chern character of the rank \((N_v+N_h)\) vector bundle \(V\) (with the structure group \(\SU(N_v) \times \SU(N_h)\)). There is a condition that is stronger than ([\[eq:B6-Bianchi-Het\]](#eq:B6-Bianchi-Het){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:B6-Bianchi-Het"}), however: \[0 = H := dB + \frac{\alpha'}{4}\left( \tr \left[\omega d\omega + \frac{2}{3}\omega\omega\omega\right]- T_R^{-1} {\rm tr} {}_R \left[A dA-i \frac{2}{3} A A A \right]\right) + ({\rm source})_{M5}\, , \label{eq:H=0}\] if we are to stick to the framework of heterotic string compactification on a Kähler manifold and constant dilation configuration (Chap.16, ). This constraint may also be understood as a combination of the F-term condition of \[W_{\rm Het} \propto \int_Z \Omega_Z \wedge H + (2\pi)^2\alpha' \int_{\Gamma(M5)} \Omega_Z \label{eq:Het-super}\] with respect to the complex structure moduli of \(Z\) and \(\vev{W_{\rm Het}} = 0\) for vanishing cosmological constant.[^71] \(\Gamma(M5)\) is a real 3-chain in \(Z = T^2 \times {\rm K3}\) whose boundary contains the curves on which M5-branes are wrapped. The exterior derivative of this condition ([\[eq:H=0\]](#eq:H=0){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:H=0"}) reproduces ([\[eq:B6-Bianchi-Het\]](#eq:B6-Bianchi-Het){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:B6-Bianchi-Het"}). The \(B\)-field Bianchi identity, ([\[eq:B6-Bianchi-Het\]](#eq:B6-Bianchi-Het){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:B6-Bianchi-Het"}), can be satisfied by wrapping an appropriate number (\(N_{M5}\)) of heterotic NS5-branes (M5-branes in heterotic M-theory) on the fibre \(T^2\). As is well-known in the literature, \[c_2(TZ) = (24 \; {\rm pt}_{K3}) \otimes 1_{T^2}, \qquad {\rm ch}_2(V) = \frac{1}{2} \sum_{i=1}^{N_v + N_h}(D_i)^2\,,\] and the only non-trivial part, which is a four-form on \(S\) and scalar on \(T^2\), of the condition ([\[eq:B6-Bianchi-Het\]](#eq:B6-Bianchi-Het){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:B6-Bianchi-Het"}) gives rise to \[\frac{1}{2} ( G^{(4)}_H )^2 + N_{M5} = 24\,. \label{eq:M5-tadpole-S}\] Here, \(G^{(4)}_H\) takes values in the lattice[^72] \((A_{N_v-1} \oplus A_{N_h-1}) \otimes [J_S^\perp \subset S_S]\), and is given by \[G^{(4)}_H = \sum_{I=1}^{N_v-1} C_I \otimes D_I + \sum_{I=1}^{N_h-1} C_I \otimes D_I, \qquad D_I =-(D_{i=1} + \cdots + D_{i=I})\,. \label{eq:G4-Het-def}\] The condition ([\[eq:H=0\]](#eq:H=0){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:H=0"}) in the two-form component on \(S\) and one-form on \(T^2\), however, contains information that is not captured by the Bianchi identity ([\[eq:B6-Bianchi-Het\]](#eq:B6-Bianchi-Het){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:B6-Bianchi-Het"}). In the presence of \({\rm U}(1)\) flux \({\cal O}_S(D_i)\) on \(S\) and a flat bundle \({\cal O}_{T^2}(p_i-e)\) (i.e., Wilson line) on \(T^2\), there is no contribution to the Chern character, but the Chern--Simons form can be non-zero. Keeping in mind that M5-branes wrapped on \(T^2\) as well as gravitational Chern--Simons form only contribute to ([\[eq:H=0\]](#eq:H=0){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:H=0"}) in the component purely three-form on \(S\), we see that \[\left. \left( dB-\frac{\alpha'}{4} T_R^{-1} \tr {}_R \left[ A dA \right] \right) \right|_{2\mbox{-}{\rm form~on~}S, \; 1\mbox{-}{\rm form~on~}T^2}= 0\,, \label{eq:H=0-fibre-dir}\] where the \(A^3\) term in the Chern--Simons form has also been dropped for the Cartan flux configuration. Since the Polyakov action remains invariant by changing the \(B\)-field background by \((2\pi)^2\alpha'\) times an integral two-form on the target space, it is possible that the \(B\)-field background configuration expanded by using the same set of \(F_A\) as in ([\[eq:Het-bndl-NvNh\]](#eq:Het-bndl-NvNh){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:Het-bndl-NvNh"}) \[B = \sum_A b_A F_A (2\pi)^2 \alpha'\] may have scalars \(b_A\) varying topologically on \(T^2\), so that \(db_A = \check{\alpha} n^8_A + \check{\beta} n_A^9\) for some integers \(n^8_A\) and \(n^9_A\) and a basis \(\{ \check{\alpha}, \check{\beta} \}\) of \(H^1(T^2; \Z)\). When \(k\) independent \(F_A\)'s in \([J_S^\perp \subset S_S]\) are involved, we find the \(k\) independent conditions on the Wilson lines \(A = A_I C_I\), \(A_I = (2\pi) (\check{\alpha} a_I^8 + \check{\beta} a_I^9)\): \[\left[ db_A + \frac{A_I}{2\pi} \left(C_I, C_J \right) n_A^{(J)} \right] \otimes F_A = 0, \qquad 2 n_A^8-a_I^8 q^I_A = 0, \quad 2 n_A^9-a_I^9 q^I_A = 0,\] where \(n_A^{(J)} :=-(n^A_{(i=1)} + \cdots + n^A_{(i=J)})\) and \(q^I_A :=-(C_{IJ})n_A^{(J)}\). Hence \(k\) combinations of the Wilson lines \(A_I\) are required to be torsion points of \({\rm Jac}(T^2)\) (equivalent to the origin of \({\rm Jac}(T^2)\) when multiplied by some non-zero integer).[^73] This is equivalent to \(k\) conditions imposed on the spectral surface data (\(a^{\rm v}_{0,2,3,\cdots}\) and \(a^{\rm h}_{0,2,\cdots}\)) and \(f_0\) and \(g_0\) (equivalently \(\tau_H\)). Let us now translate this interplay among the Cartan flux, \(B\)-field topological configuration and the reduction (stabilization) of the moduli space in the language of Narain moduli. The Narain moduli covers not just the region with parametrically large \([{\rm vol}(T^2)/\ell_s^2]\) (where supergravity approximation is good), but also the stringy region. When there is a Cartan flux and corresponding topological \(dB\) configuration, our observation above---some combinations of \(A_I\)'s are forced to be torsions of \({\rm Jac}(T^2)\)---is translated into the existence of \(k\) vectors[^74] [^75] \[n_A := (2 n^8_A, 0,2 n^9_A, 0, q^{I}_A)^T \in {\rm II}_{2,18}\,, \label{eq:Het-flux-data}\] satisfying [^76] \[\langle {\cal Z}^R, n_A \rangle = 0, \qquad {\cal Z}^R \propto \left(-\tau_H, \;-\tilde{\rho}_H, \; 1, \;-\tau_H \tilde{\rho}_H-(a)^2/2, \; a_I \right); \label{eq:Het-ZdotG}\] see Appendix [\[sec:Het-Narain\]](#sec:Het-Narain){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:Het-Narain"} for background material on Narain moduli in heterotic string theory. This mechanism is precisely the same, mathematically, as how algebraic cycles emerge for special choice of complex structure on the other side of the duality. It must be be obvious that one should define a lattice element \[\widetilde{G}^{(4)}_H := \sum_A n_A \otimes F_A \in [U \oplus U \oplus A_{N_v-1} \oplus A_{N_h-1}] \otimes [J_S^\perp \subset S_S]\] in heterotic string language in order to formulate the Cartan flux and topological \(dB\) configuration combined. Within the framework that we have assumed in this section so far,[^77] where \(Z = T^2 \times S\) is Kähler, \(\vev{\phi}_{\rm Het} = {\rm const}\) and \(\vev{H} = 0\) on the heterotic side, the duality map of the flux is given by \[\widetilde{G}^{(4)}_H = G_0 = G_{\rm tot}\,. \label{eq:G4-H-G4-F-duality}\] Within this class of Cartan flux, the norm of \(\widetilde{G}^{(4)}_H\) remains the same as that of \(G^{(4)}_H\), because with \(w^8 = w^9 = 0\), only \(n_8^A\) and \(n_9^A\) are allowed to be non-zero. Therefore, the Bianchi identity ([\[eq:M5-tadpole-S\]](#eq:M5-tadpole-S){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:M5-tadpole-S"}) becomes dual to the D3-tadpole condition ([\[eq:total-tadpole-\<=24\]](#eq:total-tadpole-<=24){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:total-tadpole-<=24"}). The duality dictionary above is a generalization and refinement of the preceding discussion in , in that we can deal with a more general class of fluxes on the heterotic spectral surface (by allowing non-trivial \(\vev{dB}\)), keep track also of flux quanta in the \(U \oplus U\) components in the form of \(\widetilde{G}^{(4)}_H = G_{\rm tot}\) or \(n_A\), maintain a clear distinction between algebraic and transcendental cycles on the F-theory side and are able to understand how the dimension of moduli space is reduced. The conventional dictionary using the stable degeneration limit of K3 surfaces is understood in the following way from the present perspective. Within the framework we have considered so far, the moduli space of \({\cal Z}^R\) (\(\propto \Omega_X\)) still maintains a free choice of at least \(\tau_H\) and \(\tilde{\rho}_H\), even after maximally possible Cartan fluxes (rank = \(N_v+N_h-2\)) are introduced in the \(\SU(N_v) \times \SU(N_h)\) structure group (no \(G_1\) component yet, in particular). Thus, from this moduli space we can extract a family of K3 surfaces parametrized by \(\tilde{\rho}_H\). This family \(\pi: {\cal X} \longrightarrow D\) is defined on a disc \(D \subset \C\) with \(t = 1/\tilde{\rho}_H\) as the coordinate, just like the discussion in footnote [\[fn:degeneration-limit-A\]](#fn:degeneration-limit-A){reference-type="ref" reference="fn:degeneration-limit-A"} for the family defined by ([\[eq:Weierstrass-degen-lim\]](#eq:Weierstrass-degen-lim){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:Weierstrass-degen-lim"}). Mathematically, this family may be augmented by providing the degeneration limit corresponding to \(t =1/\tilde{\rho}_H = 0 \in D\), which is called the central fibre. Each fibre (K3 surface) \(\pi^{-1}(\tilde{\rho}_H)\) for some \(1/\tilde{\rho}_H \in D\) contains an algebraic cycle (curve) corresponding to \(n_A\) in ([\[eq:Het-flux-data\]](#eq:Het-flux-data){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:Het-flux-data"}, [\[eq:Het-ZdotG\]](#eq:Het-ZdotG){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:Het-ZdotG"}), and those algebraic cycles (curves) for various \(\tilde{\rho}_H\) are collectively regarded as an algebraic family of curves, or equivalently as a divisor in \({\cal X}\). The intersection of this divisor with the central fibre, \(\pi^{-1}(0) = dP_9 \cup dP_9\), determines an algebraic cycle in \(dP_9 \cup dP_9\). In this way, the stable degeneration limit of \(n_A\) is obtained. Appendix [\[sec:Km-E6E6\]](#sec:Km-E6E6){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:Km-E6E6"} describes the behaviour of a semistable degeneration of a K3 surface and its algebraic cycles using a concrete example given by ([\[eq:Inose-pencil\]](#eq:Inose-pencil){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:Inose-pencil"}). We will see there how the semistable degeneration limit of an algebraic cycle can have an image in only one of the two \(dP_9\)'s (only in visible/hidden sector \(dP_9\)). Just like in the heterotic string picture of F-terms ([\[eq:Het-super\]](#eq:Het-super){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:Het-super"}) leading to the stabilization of Wilson line moduli \(\vev{A}_I\), we can also understand[^78] the stabilization of the D7-brane positions in the dual type IIB theory on the orientifold \(K3\times T^2/\Z_2\). The type IIB version of the superpotential ([\[eq:Het-super\]](#eq:Het-super){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:Het-super"}) is \[W_{\rm IIB} \propto \int_M \Omega_M \wedge G^{(3)} + \int_S i_{X*}\Omega_M \wedge F = \int_M \Omega_M \wedge G^{(3)} + \int_S \Omega_{M; ijk} \tr \left[ X^i F_{lm} \right]\,, \label{iibWD7}\] where \(X^i\) is the fluctuation of D7-brane in the transverse direction. Let us assume that we give a vev \(D_i\) to the gauge field strength for the \(i\)-th D7-brane. Its contribution can also be described by rewriting the last term above as \(W = \int_{\Gamma(D7)} \Omega_M\). Here, \(\Gamma(D7)\) is a 3-chain whose boundary consists of a two-cycle Poincaré dual (in \(S\)) to \(D_i\) and a reference two-cycle \(D_0\). We can expand \(D_i=n_i^A F_A\). Furthermore, we can introduce a three-form flux \(G^{(3)} = F^{(3)}-\phi H^{(3)}\). Here \(\phi\) is the type IIB axiodilaton and \(F^{(3)}\) and \(H^{(3)}\) are the type IIB R-R and NS-NS fluxes, respectively. We also expand \(G^{(3)} = F^{(3)}-\phi H^{(3)} = (m_F^A-\tau m_H^A)F_A\) for a basis of two-cycles \(F_A\) of the \(K3\) surface \(S\) and some \(m_F^A, m_H^A\in H^1(T^2; \mathbb{Z})\). Using that \(\Omega_M = \Omega_S\wedge dz\), we can evaluate the superpotential to be \[W_{\rm IIB} \propto \sum_A \int_S \Omega_S \wedge F_A \sum_i \left( m_F^A-\phi m_H^A + \int_0^{X_i} n^i_A \, dz \right) \,.\label{iibWd7}\] The orientifold involution demands that we supply an image D7-brane at \(\hat{X}_i=-X^i\) for any D7-brane at \(X^i\). The \({\rm U}(1)\) gauge field surviving the orientifold involution is \(\hat{A}^i-A^i\), so that the image brane also carries a flux \(\hat{D}^i=-D^i\) and the two signs cancel in [\[iibWd7\]](#iibWd7){reference-type="eqref" reference="iibWd7"}. The orientifold involution also sends \(G^{(3)}\mapsto-G^{(3)}\), so that the only modes that survive are those expanded into odd three-forms. All three-forms used for the expansion of \(G^{(3)}\) are odd, so that this is already taken care of. We can hence capture the effect of orientifolding by only considering 16 branes at \(X^i\) with fluxes \(D_i\) on their worldvolume and putting a factor of two in front of the last term in [\[iibWd7\]](#iibWd7){reference-type="eqref" reference="iibWd7"}. The conditions for supersymmetry coming from the superpotential are then written as \[\sum_i \left( m_F^A-\phi m_H^A + 2\int_0^{X_i} n^i_A \, dz \right) = 0\,.\] Just as for the Wilson lines, the positions of the branes should add up to a torsion point of \(T^2\), so that the above can be cancelled by an appropriate choice of \(F_3\). Note that \(\phi \rightarrow i\infty\) in the weak coupling limit, so that (assuming \(n^i_A\) is finite) we cannot use \(H_3\) for the same purpose. This is as expected, as the three-form \(dB\), which took part in the same mechanism on the heterotic side, is turned into \(F_3=dC_2\) under the duality map. The need to put (some of) the D7-branes at special loci on \(T^2/\Z_2\) in order to have supersymmetric world-volume flux and the connection to the existence of algebraic cycles in the F-theory K3 has also been discussed in. A lesson to be learnt from this is that instead of considering \(G_3\) alone, the combination of \(G^{(3)}\) and the contribution from D7-branes we see above should be of type \((2,1)\). This is just like the corresponding condition in heterotic string theory, where the vanishing of \(H\) including both \(dB\) and the Chern--Simons terms is required. Even for three-form fluxes \(H^{(3)}\) and \(F^{(3)}\) that cannot be made purely type \((2,1)\) and primitive for any choice of \(\vev{\phi}\) and complex structure of \(M\), there may be supersymmetric configurations for an appropriate choice of D7/O7-brane configuration. Turning this argument around, one can also see that once a \(G^{(3)}\) configuration is found so that the supersymmetric conditions are satisfied for a D7/O7-brane configuration, then all the supersymmetric configurations consist of a sum of this special combination of flux plus any primitive pure \((2,1)\) form. ### GUT 7-brane flux/singular fibre flux Let us also make a brief remark on the GUT 7-brane flux (singular fibre flux), before moving on to the next section. Suppose that a flux ([\[eq:G0-Wx-Ss-expansion\]](#eq:G0-Wx-Ss-expansion){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:G0-Wx-Ss-expansion"}) is introduced for \(C_I\) (i.e., the corresponding \(F_I\) does not vanish) in an irreducible component \(R\) of \(W_{\rm root}\). Although there is a gauge theory on 7-brane (\(\simeq S \times \R^{3,1}\)) with the gauge group \(R\), the flux turns on a non-trivial line bundle on the 7-brane and the symmetry of \(R\) is broken down to \([C_I^\perp \subset R]\) in the effective theory below the Kaluza--Klein scale. The field contents in the effective theory can be described in terms of irreducible representations of the unbroken symmetry group \([C_I^\perp \subset R]\). Let \(\alpha\) be a root of \(R\) that does not belong to \([C_I^\perp \subset R]\), and \(D_\alpha = \sum_I (\alpha, C_I) F_I\) a divisor on \(S\). Since we have assumed from the outset that \(F_I \in [J_S^\perp \subset S_S]\), we have that \(H^0(S; {\cal O}_S(D_{\pm \alpha})) = 0\), as long as the Kähler form \(J_S\) is in \({\rm Amp}_S\) (defined as an open set). If \(H^0(S; {\cal O}_S(D_{\alpha}))\) or \(H^0(S; {\cal O}_S(D_{-\alpha}))\) were non-trivial, then either \(D_\alpha\) or \(D_{-\alpha}\) is a divisor class represented by an effective curve, which should have a positive intersection number with any other divisor (including \(J_S\)) in the ample cone \({\rm Amp}_S\). If, however, we allow some \((-2)\)-curves to have zero volume under \(J_S\) (i.e., \(J_S \in \overline{{\rm Amp}}_S \backslash {\rm Amp}_S\)), some effective divisors may have zero volume and \(H^0(S; {\cal O}_S(D_{\pm \alpha})) \neq \phi\) is not ruled out mathematically. This is also true when we cannot rely entirely on the local field theory approximation. Just like in toroidal orbifold examples where symmetry may sometimes be restored even in the presence of symmetry-breaking orbifold twists, stringy effects at zero-volume cycles may bring about consequences beyond the local field theory/supergravity approximation. Keeping in mind that \[\begin{aligned} h^0(S; {\cal O}_S(D_{\alpha})) + h^0(S; {\cal O}_S(D_{-\alpha})) & = & h^0(S; {\cal O}_S(D_\alpha)) + h^2(S; {\cal O}_S(D_{\alpha})), \nonumber \\ & \geq & \chi(S; {\cal O}_S(D_\alpha)) = 2 + \frac{(D_\alpha)^2}{2} \end{aligned}\] on a K3 surface \(S\), there is always such a zero-volume \((-2)\) curve for a flux such that \((D_\alpha)^2 =-2\). For fluxes where \((D_{\alpha})^2 \leq-4\), however, there is no such immediate consequence. As long as we stay within the field theory approximation (which means that \(J_S \in {\rm Amp}_S\), or at least \(h^0(S; {\cal O}_S(D_\alpha))=0\)), the number of chiral multiplets in the irreducible component containing the root \(\pm \alpha\) is given by \[h^1(S; {\cal O}_S(D_{ \pm \alpha})) =-\chi(S; {\cal O}_S(D_{\pm \alpha})) =-\frac{(D_\alpha)^2}{2}-2. \label{eq:nmbr-vctr-like-pair}\] Note that there is no net chirality because of \((D_\alpha, K_S) = 0\). ## Vacuum Distribution based on continuous approximation {#ssec:orientifold-beyond} There have been attempts, most notably in [@Ashok:2003gk; @Denef:2004ze; @DeWolfe:2004ns; @Denef:2008wq], of going beyond a case-by-case analysis of flux configuration counting. We initiate an effort of generalizing their approach by implementing various concepts that we have already developed in this section, so that we can ask statistical questions that are of interest in the context of particle physics, not just in cosmology. To do so, we use what we call the *restricted complex structure moduli space*, which is the space of complex structure deformations leaving a chosen set of divisors algebraic. For a \({\rm K3}\) surface (or \({\rm K3} \times {\rm K3}\)), we denote this by \({\cal M}_*(J_S, W_{\rm noscan})\). It is the moduli space of complex structures for which the (fixed) Kähler form \(J_S\) stays purely of type \((1,1)\) and the divisors spanning \(W_{\rm noscan}\) remain algebraic. This means that we only consider complex structures such that \(\Omega \cdot W_{\rm noscan} = 0\) [^79]. For more general fourfolds (where \(H^{2,0}=0\)) the first condition, \(J_Y\) being of type \((1,1)\), is automatically satisfied, so that we simply use the notation \({\cal M}_*(W_{\rm noscan})\) here. **I** An approach of is to replace the sum over all the flux configurations taking their value in a lattice by continuous integration. In a theory where there are flux quanta \(N\) specified by \(K\) integers, the vacuum index density \(d\mu_I\) is defined on \({\cal M}_*(J_S, W_{\rm noscan})\) (of complex dimension \(m\)) by \[\begin{aligned} d\mu_I & = & d^{2m} z \sum_{N} \Theta(L_*-L) \delta^{2m}(D_a W,\overline{D_bW}) \; {\rm det}\left( \begin{array}{cc} D_c D_d W & \partial_c \overline{D_d W} \\ \bar{\partial}_{\bar{c}}D_dW & \overline{D_cD_d W} \end{array} \right)_{2m \times 2m} \label{eq:index-density-pre} \\ & \approx & d^{2m}z \int_N d^K N \; \Theta(L_*-L) \delta^{2m}(D_a W,\overline{D_bW}) \; {\rm det}\left( \begin{array}{cc} D_c D_d W & \partial_c \overline{D_dW} \\ \bar{\partial}_{\bar{c}} D_dW & \overline{D_cD_d W} \end{array} \right)_{2m \times 2m} \,. \label{eq:index-density} \end{aligned}\] Here, the \(z^a\) are complex local coordinates on \({\cal M}_*\). The definition of this index density \(d\mu_I\) is independent of the choice of local coordinates on \({\cal M}_*\) and becomes an \((m,m)\)-form on \({\cal M}_*/\Gamma_*\), where \(\Gamma_*\) is the modular group. The vacuum index density can be used to set a lower bound in the number of vacua (without the condition \(\vev{W_{\rm GVW}} = 0\)). In type IIB compactification on a Calabi--Yau threefold \(M_3\) with an orientifold projection yielding \(n\) irreducible O7-planes, for example, \({\cal M}_*(D_4^{\oplus n})\) is the same as the moduli space of complex structures of \(M_3\) together with the axi-dilaton. We only consider configuration of 7-branes such that they appear in the combination of \(\SO(8)\) 7-brane gauge groups, i.e. we out four D7-branes on each O7-plane. Then the restricted moduli space \({\cal M}_*\) has complex dimension \(m=(h^{2,1}_{-,{\rm prim.}}(M_3)+1)\) and there are \(K = 4(h_{-,{\rm prim.}}^{2,1}(M_3) + 1)\) integers for type IIB three-form quanta satisfying the primitiveness condition \(G^{(3)} \wedge J_M = 0\). The delta functions (F-term conditions) reduce the flux space to be integrated from real \(K\) dimensions to \(K-2m\) dimensions. The remaining integral in the flux space (at each point in the moduli space \({\cal M}_*/\Gamma_*\)) is over primitive and (2,1) or (0,3)-type (i.e., imaginary self-dual) three-form fluxes \(G^{(3)}\) in type IIB Calabi--Yau orientifold. It is bounded in region, because the contribution of such flux to the D3-tadpole \[\frac{1}{2} G^{(4)}_{\rm tot} \cdot G^{(4)}_{\rm tot} \longrightarrow \frac{i}{2} \frac{G^{(3)} \wedge \overline{G^{(3)}}}{ {\rm Im}(\phi) } = H^{(3)} \wedge F^{(3)}\] is positive definite and is bounded from above by \(L_*\), the total O3 plane charge in \(M_3\). The vacuum index density thus becomes a finite-valued distribution \((m,m)\)-form on the moduli space \({\cal M}_*/\Gamma_*\). By following the argument of [@Ashok:2003gk; @Denef:2004ze], it is not hard to realize that the integral over the finite \((K-2m)\)-dimensional region within the flux space \(d^K N\) yield a factor \(L_*^{(K-2m)/2}\) for \(z \in {\cal M}_*\). The Jacobian between the moduli space coordinates \(z_a\) and the remaining real \(2m\) coordinates of the continuous flux space \(d^K N\) gives rise to another factor \((L_*)^{2m/2}\). Hence the vacuum index density of the landscape is given by \[d\mu_I = \frac{1}{(K/2)! }(2 \pi L_*)^{K/2} \times \rho_{\rm ind.}, \label{eq:A-Den-Doug}\] where \(\rho_{\rm ind.}\) is an \((m,m)\)-form on \({\cal M}_*/\Gamma_*\). Note that \(K\) and \(m\) are distinguished intentionally; although the relation \(K = 4m\) holds in type IIB Calabi--Yau orientifolds, it does not necessarily hold when one pays attention to a restricted subset of the full complex structure moduli space of \(M_3\) (e.g., \(K = 3\) and \(m=1/2\) model for \(M_3 = T^6\) in ), or in applications to F-theory. The \((m,m)\)-form \(\rho_{\rm ind.}\) in ([\[eq:A-Den-Doug\]](#eq:A-Den-Doug){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:A-Den-Doug"}) does not depend on \(L_*\) primarily[^80]. For this reason, the factor \((L_*)^{K/2} / (K/2)!\) roughly determines the overall number of flux vacua in the landscape on \({\cal M}_*/\Gamma_*\) and the distribution within the moduli space \({\cal M}_*/\Gamma_*\) is controlled by \(\rho_{\rm ind.}\). Whether the continuous approximation is good or bad crucially depends on the value of \(L_*\). To take an example, let us consider the rigid Calabi--Yau threefold model studied in [@Ashok:2003gk; @Denef:2004ze; @DeWolfe:2004ns], where \(h^{2,1}(M_3)=0\) and the moduli space \({\cal M}\) is that of the axi-dilaton of type IIB string theory. The distribution of flux vacua is presented in Figure [\[fig:landscape-cont-discr\]](#fig:landscape-cont-discr){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:landscape-cont-discr"} without making the continuous approximation for three different values of \(L_*\). For the one with \(L_* = 150\), which is also found in, the continuous approximation looks reasonably good. For cases with small value of \(L_*\), however, the continuous approximation is not very good, as in Figure [\[fig:landscape-cont-discr\]](#fig:landscape-cont-discr){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:landscape-cont-discr"} with \(L_*=20\). When the continuous approximation is not good, it is more appropriate to i) specify the set of points in \({\cal M}_*/\Gamma_*\) that admit integral fluxes, and ii) describe how many choices of such integral flux configurations are available at such points. Suppose the dilaton vev \(\vev{\phi}\) takes its value in an algebraic extension field \({\cal F}\) over \(\Q\) with \({\cal D} := {\rm dim}_\Q {\cal F} = 2\), and the complex structure moduli of \(M_3\) are such that \([\Omega_{M_3}] \in {\cal F}\P[H^3(M_3)]\) and \([D_i \Omega_{M_3}] \in {\cal F} \P[H^3(M_3)]\) for \(i=1, \cdots, h^{2,1}(M_3)\). Then the number of flux quanta at our disposal (while preserving the F-term conditions) is \[\kappa = 4(h^{2,1}(M)_{-,{\rm prim.}} + 1)- ({\cal D} = 2) \times (h^{2,1}(M)_{-,{\rm prim.}}+1), \label{eq:nmbr-flx-quanta-eachpt-IIB}\] which is reduced to \[\kappa' = 4(h^{2,1}(M)_{-,{\rm prim.}} + 1)- ({\cal D} = 2) \times (h^{2,1}(M)_{-,{\rm prim.}}+1) -({\cal D}=2) \label{eq:nmbr-flx-quanta-eachpt-IIB-W0}\] when \(\vev{W_{\rm GVW}} = 0\) is required. Consequently, the number of flux configuration scales for a given complex structure \((\vev{\phi}, \vev{z^a})\) as \((L_*)^{\kappa/2}\) or \((L_*)^{\kappa'/2}\), respectively. The overall number of flux vacua, estimated to be \((L_*)^{2(h^{2,1}(M)_{-,{\rm prim.}}+1)}\), should be reproduced partially from \((L_*)^{\kappa/2}\) times the number of such \({\cal D}=2\) vacua in the fundamental domain of the moduli space, and the rest must come from similar contributions from vacua with different value of the extension degree \({\cal D}\). The \(rk_7 = 16\) landscapes of F-theory on \({\rm K3} \times {\rm K3}\) in Section [5.2](#ssec:rank-16){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:rank-16"} fits very well with this discrete picture in two different ways. First, \(L_*\) in the type IIB language comes from \(\chi(Y_4)/24\) in F-theory, which remains small for \(Y_4= {\rm K3} \times {\rm K3}\). This is visible most clearly in Figure [\[fig:gamma-lattice\]](#fig:gamma-lattice){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:gamma-lattice"}, or in the relatively short list of vacuum points (there are 66) in the moduli space in Table [3](#tab:AK-notmorethan24){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:AK-notmorethan24"} or merely 170 pairs found in the analysis of Section [5.2](#ssec:rank-16){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:rank-16"}. These results definitely look closer to the \(L_*=20\) picture in Figure [\[fig:landscape-cont-discr\]](#fig:landscape-cont-discr){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:landscape-cont-discr"} than the one with \(L_*=150\). The second reason is that the number of scanning flux quanta \(\kappa\) available at each isolated point in \({\cal M}_*(J_S, W_{\rm noscan})\) remains the same for all the \(W_{\rm noscan}\)-landscapes for F-theory on \({\rm K3} \times {\rm K3}\) with \(rk_7 = {\rm rank}(W_{\rm noscan}) = 16\). This is obvious in the case of the \(W_{\rm noscan} = (D_4^{\oplus 4}); (\Z_2 \times \Z_2)\)-landscape, because this is the type IIB orientifold compactification on \(M_3 = T^2 \times K3\) with all the O7-planes accompanied by four D7-branes on top of them. But, even for other choices with \({\rm rank}(W_{\rm noscan}) = 16\), the number of scanning flux quanta \(\kappa\), and hence the estimate of the number of \({\cal D}=2\) vacua should remain much the same, even if \(W_{\rm noscan}\) contains \(E_{6,7,8}\) type gauge group. The number of flux quanta freely scanned over for a given Kähler form ([\[eq:Kahler-4-F-theory\]](#eq:Kahler-4-F-theory){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:Kahler-4-F-theory"}) and a rank-16 \(W_{\rm noscan}\) was \[\kappa = 8 + 2 \times 17, \qquad \kappa' = 6 + 2 \times 17\] in the study in Section [5.2](#ssec:rank-16){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:rank-16"}, which agrees with the type IIB orientifold value ([\[eq:nmbr-flx-quanta-eachpt-IIB\]](#eq:nmbr-flx-quanta-eachpt-IIB){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:nmbr-flx-quanta-eachpt-IIB"}, [\[eq:nmbr-flx-quanta-eachpt-IIB-W0\]](#eq:nmbr-flx-quanta-eachpt-IIB-W0){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:nmbr-flx-quanta-eachpt-IIB-W0"}) for \(h^{2,1}(T^2 \times {\rm K3})_{-,{\rm prim.}} = 1 + 19\). The action of the modular group \(\Gamma_*\) is implemented in the continuous approximation of by simply restricting the complex \(m\)-dimensional restricted moduli space \({\cal M}_*\) to its fundamental region. If \(L_*\) is small and one is in a situation of maintaining the discrete approach, one can still restrict the space \({\cal M}_*\) to its fundamental region under the action of the modular group \(\Gamma_*\). Furthermore, one has to take a quotient of integral flux configurations admitted for a given point \([z] \in {\cal M}_*/\Gamma_*\) by the residual modular group \(\Gamma_*(z)\), the stabilizer subgroup of a representative point \(z \in {\cal M}_*\). In the example of type IIB on a rigid Calabi--Yau threefold, the first few axi-dilaton vevs for small flux contribution to the D3-tadpole sit at a special point in the axi-dilaton moduli space, \(\vev{\phi} = i\), where the stabilizer subgroup of the moduli space \(\Gamma_* = {\rm SL}(2; \Z)\) is non-trivial. Flux configurations for \(\vev{\phi} = i\) have to be modded out by the non-trivial residual modular group. Exactly the same phenomenon takes place in the case of compactification of F-theory on \({\rm K3} \times {\rm K3}\). For any point \((\omega_X, \omega_S)\) in the moduli space \(D^{(X)} \times D^{(S)}\), the stabilizer subgroup of \(\Gamma\) in ([\[eq:modular-group-F\]](#eq:modular-group-F){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:modular-group-F"}) contains \[\left( \left[ W^{(2)}(S_X) \rtimes {\rm Aut}(X) \right] \times \left[ W^{(2)}(S_S) \rtimes {\rm Aut}(S) \right] \right)\,. \label{eq:temp-2}\] \({\cal M}_*(J_S, W_{\rm noscan})\), however, further specifies an embedding of \([J_S] \in S_S \otimes \R/\R_{\geq 0}\) and \((U_* \oplus W_{\rm noscan}) \subset S_X\). Thus, only the subgroup of ([\[eq:temp-2\]](#eq:temp-2){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:temp-2"}) preserving this embedding remains as the residual modular group \(\Gamma_*\) acting on the flux configuration. None of the reflection subgroup \(W^{(2)}(S_S)\) will be left in the residual modular group as long as \(J_S\) is in the interior of the cone \(\overline{{\rm Amp}}_S\). In our numerical study in Section [5.2](#ssec:rank-16){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:rank-16"} \(J_S\) is sitting on a boundary of \(\overline{{\rm Amp}}_S\), so that the \(W_{E_8} \times W_{E_8}\) Weyl group in \(W^{(2)}(S_S)\) is in the residual modular group \(\Gamma_*\). Similarly, most of \(W^{(2)}(S_X)\) is also gone from the residual modular group because of the embedding of \(U_* \oplus W_{\rm noscan}\). At a point \(\omega_X \in D^{(X)}\) where an extra non-Abelian factor of \(W_{\rm root}\) emerges outside of \(W_{\rm noscan}\), however, its Weyl group is still a part of \(\Gamma_*\). The automorphisms in \({\rm Aut}(X) \cap \Gamma_*\) at least preserve the elliptic fibration morphism and the zero-section, so this is a small subgroup of \({\rm Aut}(X)\). We should also remark that our vacuum counting in Section [4.2](#ssec:sbtl-stat){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:sbtl-stat"} exploited all possible \({\rm Aut}(S)\) to take a quotient of the set of \(G_1\)-type fluxes. Since the argument there does not refer to the choice of \(J_S\), one either has to count varieties in \(J_S\) or use only the subgroup of \({\rm Aut}(S)\) preserving \(J_S \in \overline{\rm Amp}_S\) when taking a quotient of the flux configurations. In landscapes where \(L_*\) is small, there is a pronounced void structure in the vacuum distribution on \({\cal M}_*/\Gamma_*\), and a significant fraction of vacua are accumulated at the special points at the centre of the voids. Sample statistics in Section [4.3](#ssec:sample-stats){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:sample-stats"} and, in particular, Section [5.2](#ssec:rank-16){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:rank-16"} must have been strongly influenced by this effect. Especially when it comes to the fraction of symmetric vacua in the statistics (such as the fraction of CP preserving vacua in Section [4.3](#ssec:sample-stats){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:sample-stats"}), the small value of \(L_*\) from \(\chi(Y_4)/24 = 24\) must have a strong impact. Keeping this in mind, one should not view the high fraction of CP symmetric vacua as a generic prediction of F-theory. **II** From the perspective of F-theory, there is no reason to focus our attention only to \(W_{\rm noscan}\)-landscapes with \(rk_7 = {\rm rank}(W_{\rm noscan}) = 16\). It is thus natural to discuss flux vacuum distribution on the restricted moduli space \({\cal M}_*(J_S, W_{\rm noscan})\). In the rest of this section, we treat \(\chi(Y_4)/24\) (or \(L_*\)) as if it were a free parameter. By doing so, we can get a feeling for how the vacuum distribution depends on such parameters as \(rk_7\)---the rank of fixed 7-brane gauge groups---in F-theory compactification on general elliptic Calabi--Yau fourfolds (not necessarily \({\rm K3} \times {\rm K3}\)). With this in mind, we use the continuous approximation to the space of flux quanta [@Ashok:2003gk; @Denef:2004ze; @DeWolfe:2004ns]. For \({\rm K3} \times {\rm K3}\), the restricted moduli space \({\cal M}_*(J_S, W_{\rm noscan})\) is of complex dimension \(m=(18-rk_7)+19\). The vacuum index density ([\[eq:index-density\]](#eq:index-density){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:index-density"}) of in this set-up becomes an \((m,m)\)-form on \({\cal M}_*\). Summation over the flux configuration is replaced by an integral, \(d^K N\), and the delta functions (F-term condition) remove the integral over the \((3,1)+(1,3)\) Hodge components of the flux. Since we restrict the flux to be orthogonal to \(W_{\rm noscan}\), there are only complex \(m = (20-2-rk_7) + (20-1)\) dimensions of such \((3,1)\) components to begin with, and hence all the integrals of the \((3,1)+(1,3)\) components are removed from \(\int d^K N\) in ([\[eq:index-density\]](#eq:index-density){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:index-density"}). There are still remaining integrals over real \(K-2m = 2 \times 2 + (18-rk_7) \times 19\) dimensions of the space of flux configuration; contribution to the D3-brane tadpole is positive definite in this space. This argument will lead to the vacuum index distribution that is an \((m, m)\)-form \(\rho_{\rm ind.}\) on \({\cal M}_*(J_S, W_{\rm noscan})/\Gamma_*\) multiplied by a factor \((L_*)^{K/2}\) with \(K =[(20-rk_7) \times 21 ]\). By requiring that \(\vev{W_{\rm GVW}} = 0\), \(K\) is replaced by \(K' = K-2\). Therefore, the number of vacua in the ensemble of a given \(W_{\rm noscan}\) and \(J_S\) roughly scales as \((L_*)^{-(21/2) \times rk_7}\) as a function of \(rk_7\). In order to study the ratio of the number of \(\SO(10)\) vacua to \(\SU(5)\) vacua in F-theory on \({\rm K3} \times {\rm K3}\) flux vacua, one should also address Kähler moduli stabilization, and the vacuum counting on the choice of \(J_S\) need to be used as the weight multiplied on top of the distribution on \({\cal M}_*(J_S, W_{\rm noscan})/\Gamma_*\). It will be arguable whether the \({\rm K3} \times {\rm K3}\) compactification of F-theory is phenomenologically interesting enough to motivate such a laborious study. Unless the weight factor from Kähler moduli stabilization contains very strong \(rk_7\)-dependence, it seems very difficult to overturn the statistical ratio of \((L_*)^{-10.5}\) of \(\SO(10)\) vacua to \(\SU(5)\) vacua simply coming from the flux statistics for fixed \(J_S\). In such cases as \(W_{\rm noscan} = A_4\) or \(D_5\) in \(Y = X \times S = {\rm K3} \times {\rm K3}\) compactification of F-theory, there exists a primitive embedding \(\phi: U \oplus W_{\rm noscan} \hookrightarrow \Lambda_{\rm K3}^{(X)} \cong H_2(X; \Z)\). Furthermore, such an embedding is unique modulo \({\rm Isom}^+(\Lambda_{\rm K3}^{(X)})\) due to Theorem 1.14.4 of and Theorem 2.8 of (which is also quoted as Thm. \(\epsilon\) in ). Thus, the restricted moduli space \({\cal M}_*\) can be constructed out of a single piece[^81] of the restricted period domain \[\P \left[ \left\{ \left. \Omega_X \in (\Lambda_{\rm K3}^{(X)})^* \otimes \C \; \right| \; \Omega_X \wedge \Omega_X = 0, \; \langle \Omega_X, \phi(U \oplus W_{\rm noscan}) \rangle = 0, \; \Omega_X \wedge \overline{\Omega}_X > 0 \right\} \right].\] If an attractive K3 surface \(X = X_{[a~b~c]}\) admits an elliptic fibration whose \(W_{\rm frame}\) contains a \(W_{\rm noscan}\) as above, its \(\Omega_X\) (equivalently a primitive embedding of its \(T_X\) into \([\phi(U \oplus W_{\rm noscan})^\perp \subset \Lambda_{\rm K3}^{(X)}]\)) should be found in this single piece of restricted period domain. Such an embedding of \(T_X\), however, is no longer unique under the subgroup of \({\rm Isom}^+(\Lambda_{\rm K3})\) preserving the embedding \(\phi: (U \oplus W_{\rm noscan}) \hookrightarrow \Lambda_{\rm K3}^{(X)}\). In Sections [4.1](#ssec:J1-J2-phys){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:J1-J2-phys"} and [4.2.3](#sssec:counting-F-practice){reference-type="ref" reference="sssec:counting-F-practice"}, we discussed multiplicities of elliptic fibration on a given attractive K3 surface \(X\) and a given isometry class of frame lattice. This multiplicity appears as a part of the non-uniqueness of the embedding of \(T_X\) into \([\phi(U \oplus W_{\rm noscan})^\perp \subset \Lambda_{\rm K3}^{(X)}]\) modulo the remaining subgroup of \({\rm Isom}^+(\Lambda_{\rm K3})\). **III** Having seen how the vacuum statistics depend on the rank of gauge groups, the next question of interest will be how it depends on the number of generations of matter fields. Since it is impossible to generate a non-zero net chirality on non-Abelian 7-branes in the \({\rm K3} \times {\rm K3}\) set-up, we content ourselves with studying the dependence on the number of vector-like pairs on a non-Abelian 7-brane. As we have seen in Section [5.3](#ssec:MW-singl-fbr-flux){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:MW-singl-fbr-flux"}, the singular fibre fluxes generate some vector-like pairs of matter fields, while reducing the symmetry group on the non-Abelian 7-brane associated with the singular fibre. Thus, we set the problem as follows. For some choice of \(J_S\) and \(W_{\rm noscan} \subset W_{\rm frame}\) as before, let us specify \[G_{\rm fix} = \sum_A (C_A \otimes F_A), \qquad C_A \in W_{\rm noscan} \cap W_{\rm root}, \qquad F_A \in [J_S^\perp \subset S_S].\] An ensemble of flux vacua is generated, by allowing the four-form flux \(G^{(4)}\) to be \(G_{\rm scan} + G_{\rm fix}\) for any \(G_{\rm scan}\) orthogonal to \(J_S\) and \(W_{\rm noscan}\). The vacuum index density distribution of such a landscape is obtained as an \((m,m)\) form over the restricted moduli space \({\cal M}_*(J_S, W_{\rm noscan})/\Gamma_*\). Landscapes with different \(G_{\rm fix}\) share the same restricted moduli space as long as \(W_{\rm noscan}\) and \(J_S\) remain the same. When we take \(W_{\rm noscan}\) to be \(E_7\), \(E_6\) or \(D_5\), for example, and \(G_{\rm fix} = (C_A \otimes F_A)\) so that the unbroken symmetry becomes \(E_6\), \(D_5\) or \(A_4\), the singular fibre flux \(G_{\rm fix}\) determines the number of vector-like pairs in the \({\bf 27}+\overline{\bf 27}\), \({\bf 16}+\overline{\bf 16}\) and \({\bf 10}+\overline{\bf 10}\) representations, respectively, through ([\[eq:nmbr-vctr-like-pair\]](#eq:nmbr-vctr-like-pair){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:nmbr-vctr-like-pair"}). By comparing the numbers of vacua of the ensembles of \((J_S, W_{\rm noscan}; G_{\rm fix})\) with the common \((J_S, W_{\rm noscan})\) and different \(G_{\rm fix}\), we can determine the statistical cost of leaving vector-like pairs of matter fields in certain classes of representations in the effective theory.[^82] The result is simple. Our estimate of the number of vacua in such an ensemble is given by \[(L_{*,{\rm eff}.})^{K'/2}; \qquad L_{*, {\rm eff.}} = \frac{\chi(X \times S)}{24}-\frac{1}{2}(G_{\rm fix})^2, \label{eq:def-L-eff-on-Gfix}\] replacing \(L_* = \chi(Y)/24\) by the remaining D3-tadpole \(L_{*,{\rm eff.}}\) to be cancelled by the flux other than \(G_{\rm fix}\). The more the number of vector-like pairs, the less the effective value \(L_{*,{\rm eff}.}\). If \(L_* = \chi(Y)/24\) were fairly large (and \(K'/2\) is not particularly large), then requiring one or two vector-like pairs of the matter field does not reduce the number of vacua too much, relatively. If \(L_*\) is not particularly large, then the number of vacua with a few more vector-like pairs of matter fields becomes much smaller. Clearly, this effect is further enhanced when \(K'/2\) is large. **IV** Finally, let us study the \((m,m)\)-form distribution \(\rho_{\rm ind.}\) over \({\cal M}_*/\Gamma_*\) in the context of F-theory compactification, not just the overall number of flux vacua. We begin with a review of what is known about \(\rho_{\rm ind}\) in. The most robust result on \(\rho_{\rm ind}\) states that, for F-theory compactification without much restriction on the space of scanning four-form fluxes \(G^{(4)}_{\rm scan}\), \(\rho_{\rm ind}\) is written in the form of the Euler class \(e(\nabla)\) on \({\cal M}_*\) (which means that it is a differential \(2m\)-form) associated with a connection \(\nabla\) on a real vector bundle with rank \(2m\). The formula \[\rho_{\rm ind} = {\rm det} \left(-\frac{R}{2\pi i} + \frac{\omega}{2\pi} {\bf 1} \right)_{m \times m} = e (T{\cal M}_* \otimes {\cal L}^{-1}) = c_n(T{\cal M}_* \otimes {\cal L}^{-1}), \label{eq:ADD-formula}\] is a special case of the more robust result \(\rho_{\rm ind} = e(\nabla)\). Here, \(\omega\) is the Kähler form and \(R\) the curvature \((1,1)\) form of the holomorphic vector bundle \(T{\cal M}_*\), \({\cal L}\) is the line bundle whose first Chern class is \(-\omega/(2\pi)\) and \(c={\rm det}(-kR/(2\pi i)+{\bf 1})=\sum_k c_k t^k\) defines the Chern classes. It takes an extra effort to find for which real vector bundle \(\rho_{\rm ind} = e(\nabla)\) for general cases.\ It is known that the formula ([\[eq:ADD-formula\]](#eq:ADD-formula){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:ADD-formula"}) can be used at least for two categories of landscapes. - : type IIB on a Calabi--Yau orientifold \(M_3\) with full scanning of three-form fluxes \(G^{(3)}_{\rm scan}\) and with all the D7-branes appearing as an \(\SO(8)\) configuration, i.e. four D7-branes on each O7-plane. - : F-theory compactification on a Calabi--Yau fourfold \(Y_4\) with the four-form flux scanning in a sufficiently large space. An example of category B is given by : \[G^{(4)}_{\rm scan} \in \left[H^{4,0}(Y; \C) + {\rm h.c.} \right] \oplus \left[H^{3,1}(Y; \C)_{\rm prim.} + {\rm h.c.} \right] \oplus \left[\left( H^{2,2}(Y; \R)_V \right)^\perp \subset H^{2,2}(Y; \R) \right]\,. \label{eq:scan-all-nonvertical}\] Here, \(H^{(2,2)}(Y; \R)_V\) is the subspace of \(H^{2,2}(Y; \R)\) spanned by the intersection of any pair of divisors of \(Y\) (this naive definition is made more precise shortly). Let us explain what we mean by a "sufficiently large space" when we introduced category B. Let \(V \subset H^4(Y;\R)\) be the subspace in which the four-form is scanned to generate a landscape, and let \(\{\psi_{I=1,2,\cdots} \}\) be a basis of \(V\). The assumption made (implicitly) in is that the vector space \(V\) is large enough that one can make a replacement \[\left( \int_Y \psi_I \wedge \varphi \right) (A^{-1})^{IJ} \left( \int_Y \psi_J \wedge \chi \right) \Longrightarrow \int_Y \varphi \wedge \chi, \qquad A_{IJ} := \int_Y \psi_I \wedge \psi_J \label{eq:cond-ADD-formula}\] for arbitrary differential forms \(\psi\) and \(\chi\) that belong to the vector space[^83] \[G^{(4)}_{\rm scan} \in \left[H^{4,0}(Y_z; \C) + H^{0,4}(Y_z; \C) \right] \oplus \left[H^{3,1}(Y_z; \C)_* + H^{1,3}(Y_z; \C)_* \right] \oplus H^{2,2}(Y_z; \R)_{H*}\,. \label{eq:space-G4-40-31-22H*sect}\] The quantities \([H^{3,1}(Y_z; \C)_*\) and \(H^{2,2}(Y_z; \R)_{H*}\) are defined in the next paragraph and [\[eq:H22-horizontal\*-def\]](#eq:H22-horizontal*-def){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:H22-horizontal*-def"}. It is a natural generalization of the category B landscapes above to require extra divisors corresponding to extra 7-brane gauge groups, i.e. introduce a \(W_{\rm noscan}\) as done earlier in this section. The moduli space \({\cal M}_*(J_Y,W_{\rm noscan})\) is then reduced in dimensions from the full space of complex structure moduli of \(Y\) compatible with a Kähler form \(J_Y\). The \(H^{3,1}+H^{1,3}\) components of the flux is then not only required to be primitive, \(G^{(4)}_{\rm scan} \wedge J_Y = 0\), but the same condition is required with regard to the divisors in \(W_{\rm noscan}\). Let \([H^{3,1}(Y_z; \C)_* + H^{1,3}(Y_z; \C)_*]\) denote the resulting smaller subspace. [\[pg:flx-31-cmp-\*\]]{#pg:flx-31-cmp-* label="pg:flx-31-cmp-*"} The \((H^{2,2}_V)^\perp\) component of the flux space is also reduced, because \(H^{2,2}(Y_z; \R)_V\) is larger in dimensions. This new \(H^{2,2}(Y_z; \R)_V\) is denoted by \(H^{2,2}(Y_z; \R)_{V*}\). We then have an ensemble of vacua with the four-form flux scanning over the vector space \[G^{(4)}_{\rm scan} \in \left[H^{4,0}(Y; \C) + {\rm h.c.} \right] \oplus \left[H^{3,1}(Y; \C)_{*} + {\rm h.c.} \right] \oplus \left[\left( H^{2,2}(Y; \R)_{V*} \right)^\perp \subset H^{2,2}(Y; \R) \right]; \label{eq:scan-all-nonvertical-gen}\] Let us refer to these landscapes as category B'. In order to state the relation between the category A landscapes and category B' landscapes, we need to prepare the following language. Consider a family of Calabi--Yau fourfolds \(\pi: {\cal Y} \longrightarrow {\cal M}_*\), where \(Y_z: = \pi^{-1}(z)\) is the Calabi--Yau fourfold corresponding to \(z \in {\cal M}_*\). We have in mind a restricted moduli space \({\cal M}_*\) for a specific choice of Kähler form \(J_Y\) and some set of divisors \(W_{\rm noscan}\) corresponding to the 7-brane gauge groups. The \(H^{2,2}(Y_z; \R)\) vector space over \(\R\) for each \(z \in {\cal M}_*\) is decomposed as follows. First, \(H^{2,2}(Y_z; \R)_{V*}\) is defined[^84] as the subspace spanned by intersection of \(Y_z\) with any pair of divisors of \({\cal Y}\). Secondly, another subspace \(H^{2,2}(Y_z; \R)_{H*} \subset H^{2,2}(Y_z; \R)\) is defined as \[{\rm Span}_\C \left\{ (D_a D_b \Omega_Y), \overline{(D_cD_d \Omega_Y)} \right\}|_{a, b,c,d \in 1, \cdots, m} \cap H^{2,2}(Y_z; \R)\,, \hspace{.5cm}m={\rm dim}\, {\cal M}_*\,. \label{eq:H22-horizontal*-def}\] It is known that - the vector space of (2,2) Hodge components is divided into \(H^{2,2}_{\ell=0} \oplus H^{2,2}_{\ell=1} \oplus H^{2,2}_{\ell=2}\) - the intersection form is positive definite on \(H^{2,2}_{\ell=0} \oplus H^{2,2}_{\ell=2}\) and negative definite on \(H^{2,2}_{\ell=1}\) - \(H^{2,2}_{\ell=1} \oplus H^{2,2}_{\ell=2}\) is contained in \(H^{2,2}(Y_z; \R)_{V*}\) The differential forms in the first component, \(H^{2,2}_{\ell=0}\) are the primitive \((2,2)\) forms. Thus, the intersection form is positive definite on the orthogonal complement \([(H^{2,2}(Y_z; \R)_{V*})^\perp \subset H^{2,2}(Y_z; \R)]\), and there is a well-defined orthogonal decomposition of the \(H^{2,2}(Y_z; \R)\) vector space: \[H^{2,2}(Y_z; \R) = H^{2,2}(Y_z; \R)_{H*} \oplus H^{2,2}(Y_z; \R)_{RM} \oplus H^{2,2}(Y_z; \R)_{V*}. \label{eq:dcmp-22-HVrm}\] Note that the remnant subspace \(H^{2,2}(Y_z; \R)_{RM}\) is not empty in general. In particular, as explained in detail in Appendix [\[sec:ADD\]](#sec:ADD){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:ADD"}, this happens already in the case of \(Y={\rm K3} \times {\rm K3}\). As discussed in Appendix [\[sec:ADD\]](#sec:ADD){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:ADD"}, the landscape of category A (roughly speaking, type IIB orientifolds with three-form scanning ([\[eq:scan-3form-in-Fdescr\]](#eq:scan-3form-in-Fdescr){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:scan-3form-in-Fdescr"})) corresponds to scanning the four-form in the \(H^{2,2}(Y;\R)_{H*}\) subspace in addition to the first two components of ([\[eq:scan-all-nonvertical\]](#eq:scan-all-nonvertical){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:scan-all-nonvertical"}), i.e., the space ([\[eq:space-G4-40-31-22H\*\]](#eq:space-G4-40-31-22H*){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:space-G4-40-31-22H*"}). This is a smaller subspace than ([\[eq:scan-all-nonvertical-gen\]](#eq:scan-all-nonvertical-gen){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:scan-all-nonvertical-gen"}), in principle, in the sense that \(H^{2,2}(Y;\R)_{RM}\) can be non-empty. This indicates that the scanning space of the flux can be sufficiently large, for the condition ([\[eq:cond-ADD-formula\]](#eq:cond-ADD-formula){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:cond-ADD-formula"}) to hold (and the formula ([\[eq:ADD-formula\]](#eq:ADD-formula){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:ADD-formula"}) also holds consequently), even when the scanning space is smaller than ([\[eq:scan-all-nonvertical-gen\]](#eq:scan-all-nonvertical-gen){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:scan-all-nonvertical-gen"}). As discussed in Appendix [\[sec:ADD\]](#sec:ADD){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:ADD"}, the four-form scanning we have introduced in this section also corresponds to the vector space ([\[eq:space-G4-40-31-22H\*\]](#eq:space-G4-40-31-22H*){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:space-G4-40-31-22H*"}). It is thus reasonable to think of one more category of landscapes in F-theory which contains both the category A landscapes and the ones on \(Y={\rm K3} \times {\rm K3}\) with arbitrary \(rk_7\) we have considered. Let us call category A' any landscapes generated by scanning four-form flux in the vector space ([\[eq:space-G4-40-31-22H\*\]](#eq:space-G4-40-31-22H*){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:space-G4-40-31-22H*"}) for an elliptic fibred Calabi--Yau fourfold[^85] \(\pi_Y: Y \rightarrow B_3\). This is to be contrasted with those in category B' where the four-form flux is scanned in ([\[eq:scan-all-nonvertical-gen\]](#eq:scan-all-nonvertical-gen){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:scan-all-nonvertical-gen"}). It must now be obvious that the formula ([\[eq:ADD-formula\]](#eq:ADD-formula){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:ADD-formula"}) holds, not just for the landscapes in category B', but also for the landscapes in category A'. Since the condition ([\[eq:cond-ADD-formula\]](#eq:cond-ADD-formula){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:cond-ADD-formula"}) requires that \(\psi_I (A^{-1})^{IJ} \psi_J\) be an insertion of a complete system only for \(\varphi, \chi\) in ([\[eq:space-G4-40-31-22H\*\]](#eq:space-G4-40-31-22H*){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:space-G4-40-31-22H*"}), it is equivalent to say that the entire vector space ([\[eq:space-G4-40-31-22H\*\]](#eq:space-G4-40-31-22H*){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:space-G4-40-31-22H*"}) is contained in the space of four-form scanning (or not). Appendix [\[sec:ADD\]](#sec:ADD){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:ADD"} also provides an alternative (more down to earth) derivation of the formula ([\[eq:ADD-formula\]](#eq:ADD-formula){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:ADD-formula"}) following the line of argument in one of the original articles ), rather than the refined version of, with an assumption ([\[eq:self-real-cond-22horizontal-4fold\]](#eq:self-real-cond-22horizontal-4fold){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:self-real-cond-22horizontal-4fold"}) and a little more concrete consequence ([\[eq:def-Riemann-curvature-analog-mirror\]](#eq:def-Riemann-curvature-analog-mirror){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:def-Riemann-curvature-analog-mirror"}). We understand that the argument here is enough to justify the formula ([\[eq:ADD-formula\]](#eq:ADD-formula){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:ADD-formula"}) for landscapes in category A'. There is an immediate consequence of this observation. Any landscape (an ensemble of vacua) in category B' is decomposed into multiple landscapes (ensembles of vacua) in category A' labelled by \(G^{(4)}_{\rm fix}\) in \(H^{2,2}(Y; \R)_{\rm RM}\). Since all of these landscapes in category A' share the same restricted moduli space \({\cal M}_*\), and since the formula ([\[eq:ADD-formula\]](#eq:ADD-formula){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:ADD-formula"}) determines \(\rho_{\rm ind}\) only in terms of geometry of \({\cal M}_*\), the vacuum index distribution \(d\mu_I\) for these landscapes in category A' are the same apart form the \(G^{(4)}_{\rm fix}\)-dependent overall normalization ([\[eq:def-L-eff-on-Gfix\]](#eq:def-L-eff-on-Gfix){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:def-L-eff-on-Gfix"}). Let us use ([\[eq:ADD-formula\]](#eq:ADD-formula){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:ADD-formula"}) to derive an explicit result on the distribution of moduli parameters. Consider a landscape of F-theory compactification on \(Y=X \times S = {\rm K3} \times {\rm K3}\) with some rank-16 \(W_{\rm noscan}\) and \(G^{(4)}_{\rm fix}\). Then the restricted moduli space is of the form \({\cal M}_* = {\cal M}_{\rho_1} \times {\cal M}_{\rho_2} \times {\cal M}_{\rm K3}(S; J_S)\). This is because the lattice \([(U_* \oplus W_{\rm noscan})^\perp \subset H^2(X; \Z)]\) is always signature \((2, 2)\), and the intersection form can be made \(U \oplus U\) for some \(\R\)-coefficient basis of the vector space obtained by tensoring \(\R\) with the signature \((2, 2)\) lattice above. The Kähler forms of the moduli spaces \({\cal M}_{\rho_1}\) and \({\cal M}_{\rho_2}\) are \(K^{(\rho_1)} =-\ln [ (\rho_1-\bar{\rho}_1)/i]\) and \(K^{(\rho_2)} =-\ln [ (\rho_2-\bar{\rho}_2)/i]\), respectively. The modulus \(\rho_1\) is interpreted as the axi-dilaton of type IIB orientifold in the case of \(W_{\rm noscan} = D_4^{\oplus 4}; (\Z_2 \times \Z_2)\). By closely following the computation of Section 3.1.2 in, we obtain \[\begin{aligned} \rho_{\rm ind} & = & \left(-\frac{R^{(\rho_1)}}{2\pi i} + \frac{\omega^{(S)}}{2\pi}+\frac{\omega^{(\rho_1)}}{2\pi} + \frac{\omega^{(\rho_2)}}{2\pi} \right) \wedge \left(-\frac{R^{(\rho_2)}}{2\pi i} + \frac{\omega^{(S)}}{2\pi}+\frac{\omega^{(\rho_1)}}{2\pi} + \frac{\omega^{(\rho_2)}}{2\pi} \right) \wedge \nonumber \\ && \qquad {\rm det}\left(-\frac{R^{(S)}}{2\pi i} + \left(\frac{\omega^{(S)}}{2\pi}+\frac{\omega^{(\rho_1)}}{2\pi} + \frac{\omega^{(\rho_2)}}{2\pi}\right){\bf 1} \right), \\ & = & 2 \frac{\omega^{(\rho_1)}}{2\pi} \wedge \frac{\omega^{(\rho_2)}}{2\pi} \wedge \left\{ c_{m-2}^{(S)} + \left(\frac{\omega^{(S)}}{2\pi}\right)^2 \wedge c_{m-4}^{(S)} \right\}, \end{aligned}\] where \(\omega^{(\rho_1)}\), \(\omega^{(\rho_2)}\) and \(\omega^{(S)}\) are the Kähler forms on the moduli spaces \({\cal M}_{\rho_1}\), \({\cal M}_{\rho_2}\) and \({\cal M}_{\rm K3}(S; J_S)\), respectively, and \(R^{(S)}\), \(R^{(\rho_2)}\) and \(R^{(\rho_1)}\) the curvature \((1,1)\)-forms of the tangent bundles of those moduli spaces [^86]. \(c_r^{(S)}\)'s are the \(r\)-th Chern class of the holomorphic rank-\((m-2)\) vector bundle \(T{\cal M}_{\rm K3}(S; J_S) \otimes ({\cal L}^{(S)})^{-1}\), where \({\cal L}^{(S)}\) is the line bundle whose first Chern class is \(-\omega^{(S)}/2\pi\). Thus, in these set-ups the vacuum index density distribution \(\rho_{\rm ind.}\) is factorized for the three pieces of the moduli space. If one is interested only in the distribution of any one among \(\rho_1\), \(\rho_2\) and moduli of the K3 surface \(S\), but not altogether, then the distribution \(\rho_{\rm ind}\) can be integrated over the irrelevant coordinates first. For the moduli \(\rho_1\) and \(\rho_2\), in particular, \[\rho_{\rm ind.} (\rho_1) \propto d [{\rm Re}\rho_1] d [{\rm Im}\rho_1] \frac{1}{({\rm Im}(\rho_1))^2}, \qquad \qquad \rho_{\rm ind.} (\rho_2) \propto d [{\rm Re}\rho_2] d [{\rm Im}\rho_2] \frac{1}{({\rm Im}(\rho_2))^2}. \label{eq:ADD-predict-phi-rho2-(K3)}\] Applying this result to the \(W_{\rm noscan} = E_8 \oplus E_8\)-landscape, in particular, the prediction in the continuous approximation ([\[eq:ADD-predict-phi-rho2-(K3)\]](#eq:ADD-predict-phi-rho2-(K3)){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:ADD-predict-phi-rho2-(K3)"}) for \(\rho_2\) can also be read as that of \([{\rm vol}(T^2)/\ell_s^2]_{\rm Het}\). Our numerical results (not relying on continuous approximation) in Section [5.2](#ssec:rank-16){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:rank-16"} agree with this prediction based on the continuous approximation qualitatively in that large \({\rm Im}(\tilde{\rho}_H) = [{\rm vol}(T^2)/\ell_s^2]_{\rm Het}\) is statistically disfavoured. Note that this happens although we should not expect the continuous approximation to be very good because \(\chi(Y)/24=24\) is not particularly large. The result ([\[eq:ADD-predict-phi-rho2-(K3)\]](#eq:ADD-predict-phi-rho2-(K3)){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:ADD-predict-phi-rho2-(K3)"}) also indicates that there is no correlation between the distribution of \(\rho_1\), \(\rho_2\) and the moduli of K3 surface \(S\), if we ignore the difference between the vacuum distribution and the vacuum index distribution. Figure [\[fig:vsA\]](#fig:vsA){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:vsA"} (iii) in Section [5.2](#ssec:rank-16){reference-type="ref" reference="ssec:rank-16"} may be regarded as a manifestation of the absence of any correlation between \(\rho_1\) and \(\rho_2\). It is an interesting question how \(\rho_{\rm ind}\) depends on \({\rm Im}(\tilde{\rho}_H)\) for different values of \(rk_7\). \(\rho_{\rm ind}\) is not expected to have a factorized form as ([\[eq:ADD-predict-phi-rho2-(K3)\]](#eq:ADD-predict-phi-rho2-(K3)){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:ADD-predict-phi-rho2-(K3)"}), but it will be in the form of \[\rho_{\rm ind} = c_{18-rk_7}^{(X)} c_{19}^{(S)} + \omega^{(X)} \omega^{(S)} c_{17-rk_7}^{(X)} c_{18}^{(S)} + (\omega^{(X)} \omega^{(S)} )^2 c_{16-rk_7}^{(X)} c_{17}^{(S)} + \cdots,\] where \(c_r^{(X)}\)'s are the \(r\)-th Chern class of the rank-\((18-rk_7)\) holomorphic vector bundle \(T{\cal M}_{\rm K3}(X; U_* \oplus W_{\rm noscan}) \otimes {\cal L}_{(X)}^{-1}\). It must still be possible to extract the leading power-law behaviour in \({\rm Im}(\tilde{\rho}_H)\) in the large \({\rm Im}(\tilde{\rho}_H)\) region of the moduli space, using the parametrization ([\[eq:Narain-parametrization-full\]](#eq:Narain-parametrization-full){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:Narain-parametrization-full"}). We leave this as an open problem in this article.

{'timestamp': '2014-01-24T02:05:40', 'yymm': '1401', 'arxiv_id': '1401.5908', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5908'}

# Introduction {#sec:intro} Studies of hydrogen-dominated (DA) and helium-dominated (DB) white-dwarf (WD) spectra have found that roughly 25 per cent of all WDs show weak metal lines, despite the theoretical prediction that metals should gravitationally settle below the photosphere. Given settling time-scales as small as days for the more-common DAs and under \(10^5\) years for DBs, the rapid rate at which gravitational settling occurs in these dense objects indicates the pollution must have occurred recently compared to their cooling ages and is likely ongoing. Furthermore, infrared excesses have been detected in a number of these WD systems. The cause of these excesses appears to be debris discs near the WDs, which are delivering the polluting material. These detections support the theory that the observed pollution is due to accreted orbiting bodies, which are perturbed towards and tidally disrupted by the central WD. The primary alternative, accretion of interstellar material, has been proven inconsistent with elemental abundances determined from WD spectra as well as spectra of the debris discs. Estimates for total mass accreted by polluted WDs are on the order of \(6\times10^{23}\) g, which is similar to the mass of minor bodies in the solar system such as Ceres. While the source of the pollution has become more clear in recent years, the mechanism for delivering such material to the star is still uncertain. Early work investigated the possibility that planetary systems close to instability during the main sequence (MS) can be destabilized by stellar mass loss during post-MS evolution. Upon scattering, the planets could settle into a new, dynamically-young configuration that would allow them to perturb other orbiting bodies, such as asteroids or comets, that were previously stable. However, the high frequency of polluted WDs means this mechanism would require a large fraction of WD progenitors to have planetary systems on the edge of stability. More recently, simulated planets on circular orbits interacting with a Kuiper-Belt analog over the course of stellar evolution. To determine the ability of the planet to pollute its host WD, the authors looked at the fraction of bodies scattered into the inner solar system, interior to the orbit of the planet. They did not simulate impacts with the WD; instead, they assumed additional planets in this region, which could further scatter bodies. The authors found that a planet near 30 au and a Kuiper Belt analog extending to 46.7 au could match the observed frequency of polluted WDs as well as the distribution of accretion rates as a function of cooling age. This result requires an inner planetary system to cause secondary scatterings, which delivers the material the full distance to the WD; a lone planet at 30 au was unable to scatter particles on to stellar-collision orbits. also found that the mass of the simulated planet had only a weak effect on the amount of material delivered to the inner system. While massive planets removed more bodies from the original belt, higher fractions were ejected relative to less-massive planets. Another recent work,, focused on rocky bodies interior to a planet as source of pollution. The authors examined the ability of a single planet to deliver material originating in the inner 2:1 Mean Motion Resonance (MMR) to a WD, through the increase in resonance width with stellar evolution. Using Jupiter and the asteroids located near the 2:1 MMR as a test case, they found that a single planet is capable of delivering enough material to the star provided the interior debris belt is large enough. Assuming a similar size distribution to the solar system asteroid belt, the authors determined that the total mass of the debris belt would need to be between 4 times and \(6\times10^5\) times larger to account for WD observations. While massive debris discs have been observed, they often exist at greater distances from their host star and their incidence appears to drop off rapidly with age. In a paper related to, examined the stability of two-planet systems over the entirety of stellar evolution, including MS, post-MS (including mass loss), and WD. The authors performed N-body integrations of the system for stellar masses 3--8 M\(_\odot\), with equal planetary masses of both M\(_\mathrm{Jup}\) and M\(_\oplus\). They found that planetary interactions leading to ejection or accretion by the star primarily occurred after \(\sim10^7\) years, supporting the possibility of planetary instability as a source of WD pollution. However, in addition to selecting large stellar masses dissimilar to the progenitors of observed polluted WDs (1--2.5 M\(_\odot\)), the authors did not investigate the effect of the unstable planets on planetesimals remaining in the system, which limits the applicability of their results to WD pollution. In this work we use N-body simulations of a single planet and massless test particles (TPs) to systematically examine the degree to which planetary properties affect WD pollution. In particular, we investigate the influence of planetary mass and eccentricity, which have largely been neglected in this context until now. Radial velocity surveys have shown that exoplanets orbiting beyond 0.1 au have a wide range of eccentricities, and a cursory examination of the current Exoplanet Orbit Database shows that over over 50 per cent of such planets have eccentricities larger than 0.2. Therefore, testing a range of eccentricities for the perturbing planet gives us greater generality than before as well as insight into the overlooked parameter space of eccentric planets. Additionally, high-resolution spectroscopy has shown that the accreted material is more consistent with the composition of solar-system asteroids or the rocky planets than comets. As a result, we investigate the region near to the star interior and exterior to planetary orbit, as opposed to the distant planet and outer belt of material used in. Furthermore, we simulate the entire region near the planet unlike the very detailed, single-MMR approach of. These simulations allow us to better understand the ability of a single planet to account for observed WD pollution rates, particularly as a function of planetary mass and eccentricity. The layout of the paper is as follows: In Section 2 we review important features of the dynamics we expect to occur in the systems simulated. In Section 3 we discuss the setup and results of our initial simulation, and repeat that for a range of masses and eccentricities in Section 4 where we find that smaller and more eccentric planets are more efficient at delivering material to the host star. Section 5 details the theoretical effects of stellar evolution, and Section 6 presents the results of our WD simulations along with a comparison to the MS simulations, which show that stellar evolution can result in a significant population of newly unstable bodies. We finish with a discussion of results and comparison to other work in Section 7 and a conclusion in Section 8. # System Dynamics {#sec:dyn} The classical orbit of a single body in the gravitational field of a star will be a Keplerian ellipse, fixed in space. However, the orbit of a third, small body, such as an asteroid, will be affected by both the star and the planet and as a result be non-integrable. The orbit of such a body can be rapidly and dramatically changed upon close encounters with the planet, leading to ejection or collision with the star. In the case of bodies much less massive than the planet, the planetary orbit will remain unchanged. Beyond scattering, the orbits of small bodies can be perturbed by planets through both global secular effects and localized resonant effects. Through secular effects, orbits near an eccentric planet will slowly increase in eccentricity. This contribution is called 'forced eccentricity': it is greatest for orbits near the planet and drops off with distance. As eccentricity increases so does the likelihood of scatterings, which further alters the orbit. Resonant effects occur at MMRs, and result from repeated encounters between bodies near the same location or locations over each orbit. These encounters can produce a rapid evolution of orbital elements such as eccentricity, or can act as a protection mechanism by preventing closer encounters between two bodies for long periods of time. MMRs are highly-localized and as such relatively small shifts in semi-major axis (SMA) can dramatically alter the stability of orbiting bodies, as will be shown in Section [4](#sec:msresults){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:msresults"}. MMRs exist where the mean motions of two bodies form an integer ratio: \[\frac{n_2}{n_1} = \frac{p}{p+q}\] Here \(n_1\) and \(n_2\) are the mean motions of the inner and outer bodies, respectively, while \(p\) and \(q\) are integers. For orbits interior to the planet, the resonance is given by \(p+q:p\) (so that \(n_1\) is the mean motion of the planet), while for exterior orbits the resonance is \(p:p+q\), with \(n_2\) being the mean motion of the planet. The strength of the resonance is determined in part by the order of the resonance, \(q\): smaller \(q\) values generally correspond to stronger resonances. However, at larger planetary eccentricities higher-order MMRs are no longer negligible, which increases the number of trapping regions for small bodies. Particles located in resonances have been shown to become unstable at late times, indicating that unstable MMRs will not be immediately cleared of bodies and can function as a source of material for the star even at late times. ## The nominal chaotic zone {#sec:chaoticzone} MMRs have a finite width that is determined by both the planet causing them, via its eccentricity and planet-to-star mass ratio, as well as the location and order of the resonance. As described in, when resonances overlap in a system it results in stochastic motion and orbital instability. In the context of planetary systems, as \(p\) increases and the mean motion of the orbit approaches that of the planet, first-order (\(q=1\)) MMRs are spaced more closely and eventually overlap. This region of overlap is known as the 'chaotic zone' (CZ) and within it orbits are chaotic, frequently becoming unstable. showed that for a planet on a circular orbit, nearby bodies become unstable when the distance between them is \[\label{eq:chaoszone} \varepsilon = \frac{a-a_p}{a_p}< 1.3 \mu^{2/7}\] where \(a\) and \(a_p\) are the SMAs of the nearby body and planet, respectively, and \(\mu=\) M\(_\mathrm{Pl}/\)M\(_*\) is the mass ratio between the planet and the central star. Numerical work by showed the same mass dependence with a slightly different coefficient: \[\label{eq:duncan} \varepsilon_\mathrm{cz} = 1.5 \mu^{2/7}\] This equation indicates that larger planets produce larger CZs, for constant stellar mass. However, a corresponding equation for planets with moderate eccentricity does not exist: such a planet causes orbits of a third body to be non-integrable. Finally, this mass-ratio dependence also has important implications for the system as the star evolves off the MS, which will be covered in Section [5](#sec:evo){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:evo"}. From the preceding paragraphs we can predict the general behavior of small bodies in the presence of a massive planet: Those closest to the planet will start between planetary pericentre and apocentre, and will rapidly be removed from the system by a collision or scattering in close encounter. Particles beyond the physical reach of the planet will be inside the CZ, and will likely go unstable as orbits become chaotic. Beyond the CZ, most particles should be stable with slight eccentricities, caused by secular effects. The exception is particles in MMRs, which may show anomalous behavior both in the CZ, where they may be more stable than their neighbors, and outside of the CZ, where they may be more unstable. Of those that are removed from the system, particles inside the orbit of the planet should have a higher likelihood of being accreted by the star, while those beyond the planet, being more weakly bound, should show a greater preference for ejection. # The first simulation {#sec:firstsim} Due to the non-integrable nature of planetary systems with an eccentric planet and other bodies, we required numerical simulations to determine the orbital behavior of the small bodies. We began by simulating a MS star and a planet of moderate eccentricity, for the purposes of comparing the results to our predictions from Section [2](#sec:dyn){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:dyn"}. While we are primarily interested in the accretion rates around WDs, simulating a planet around both a MS and WD star allowed us to compare the dynamics of the system and understand the effect of stellar evolution. ## Setup Our first simulation was composed of a solar-mass star, a single 0.3 M\(_\mathrm{Jup}\) planet orbiting with \(a_p=4\) au and \(e=0.2\), and 500 massless TPs distributed throughout the system. The stellar mass was selected due to the high frequency of solar-mass stars relative to more-massive stars, as well as for consistency with prior papers on the subject, specifically and. The planetary parameters were chosen to match theoretical predictions: exoplanets near to their host star will not survive post-MS evolution, but distant planets are unlikely to direct as much material to the star. To balance each factor the SMA was chosen to be 4 au, while the mass was selected to be in the middle of the observed eccentric exoplanet population, similar to \(0.27\) M\(_\mathrm{Jup}\) eccentric Saturn-analog OGLE-2006-BLG-109L c. The TPs were spaced 0.02 au apart from 0.06 au to 10 au, allowing us to determine stability at a range of locations. While the planet was placed on an eccentric orbit, the TPs were placed on circular orbits at random mean longitudes. This decision was made for simplicity, and represents the case where secular effects have not had time pump the eccentricities of small bodies. Such a situation could occur in a young disc recently void of gas, or if the planet gained eccentricity impulsively (as would be the case in the model of ). Non-zero initial eccentricities are discussed later in Section [4.5](#sec:QFcomp){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:QFcomp"}. In addition, each TP was assigned a random inclination within 0.5\(^\circ\) of the planet to avoid the artificial constraint of perfect coplanarity. The particles were assumed to be massless because of the minute mass estimated to be accreted by polluted WDs (\(\sim5\times 10^{-7}\) M\(_\mathrm{Jup}\)) compared to our planet size, indicating a negligible effect by polluting material on the planet. We also ran separate simulations of the strongest MMRs in greater detail: three interior to the planet at 3:1, 2:1, and 3:2; three exterior at 2:3, 1:2, and 1:3; and one co-orbital. We populated these resonances over a width of 0.2 au with a higher density of TPs, spacing them 0.004 au apart, and assigned them the same orbital properties as above. Additionally, we simulated a second set in the same locations with the same spacing but with an initial eccentricity of 0.2 to match the planet. The initial longitude of pericentre of these remained random for consistency between all simulations. These non-circular TPs allowed us to determine the sensitivity of processes and results on initial eccentricity, particularly if it could lead to increased stability over the duration of the simulation. Additionally, by comparing these two very closely spaced populations we were able to test the dependence of the loss mechanism on the initial mean longitude, which was random for all particles. During the simulations TPs were removed via one of three mechanisms: ejection from the system, occurring at 100 au; collision with the planet, which had a radius of 0.65 R\(_\mathrm{Jup}\) given the assumed planetary density of 1.33 g cm\(^{-3}\); or accretion by the central body, occurring when particles approached within 0.005 au. TPs that survived the \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}100 million year duration of the simulation were considered stable. The ejection radius was chosen to limit computation time, and it was found that increasing it to 1000 au had a negligible effect on the simulation results: the stability of particles was identical and the average lifetime in log space increased by less than five per cent. It should be noted that the majority of polluted WDs show cooling ages greater than the duration of our simulations, ranging from \(10^{7.5}\) to \(10^{10}\) years. Such time-spans were computationally too expensive to run for this work, so behavior late in the simulations (\(10^6\)--\(10^8\) years) was used as a proxy. ## Computation {#sec:comp} We ran the simulation, as well as those in Sections [4](#sec:msresults){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:msresults"} and [6](#sec:WDsims){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:WDsims"}, on the UCLA Institute for Digital Research and Education (IDRE) Hoffman2 cluster using the [Mercury]{.smallcaps} integrator package. The package contains five N-body algorithms; we initially chose the hybrid symplectic integrator, which primarily uses a second-order mixed-variable symplectic algorithm and switches to a Bulirsch-Stoer (BS) algorithm upon close encounters, in our case 3 Hill radii. This combination has the advantage of shorter integration times than non-symplectic algorithms (e.g. BS) while still allowing close encounters, which are crucial for the scattering and accretion of TPs. To test the accuracy of the hybrid integrator we repeated the simulation using the non-symplectic BS integrator. We found that, while the former was faster and accurate in determining the stability of TPs in our simulations, the loss mechanism for a given particle was frequently inconsistent with the latter. The difference originates from the known issue that the hybrid integrator has difficulty with very large eccentricities, as in the case of accreted particles. As a result, particles are ejected when they should be accreted, as shown in Figure [\[fig:comparealgs\]](#fig:comparealgs){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:comparealgs"}. Given the importance of the accretion fraction on the stellar accretion rate, it was necessary for us to use the most accurate method available within the constraints of computation time. Therefore we used the hybrid simulation to determine the size of the unstable zone around the planet, which defined our eccentric chaotic zone (ECZ), and followed with a simulation of the ECZ using the BS integrator. We defined the edges of the ECZ as the region nearest to the planet having 19 out of 20 adjacent TPs stable (corresponding to a 0.4 au wide region with at least 95 per cent of small bodies stable), to ideally include all major instabilities near the planet. We integrated the MMRs using only the BS integrator, as they were narrow and unique in stability relative to the surrounding region. ## Results {#sec:singleresults} Upon completion, the simulation returned the orbital elements as a function of time, the loss mechanisms, and the lifetimes of each individual TP. As shown in Figure [\[fig:comparealgs\]](#fig:comparealgs){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:comparealgs"}, TPs that started near the planet rapidly went unstable, forming the ECZ between the range of \(\sim2.4\) and \(\sim6.3\) au. Inside of this region some islands of stability existed, corresponding to low-order MMRs such as 2:1 and 3:4 at 3.05 and 4.85 au, respectively. The size of this ECZ was much larger than the predicted CZ for a planet on a circular orbit, which according to Equation [\[eq:duncan\]](#eq:duncan){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:duncan"} should have extended from 3.4 to 4.6 au. Individual particle motion depended on interactions with the planet and varied not only between TPs, but over the course of the simulation as well. One particle, representative of many others, started at 5.3 au and remained in the 2:3 MMR for nearly 400,000 years before scattering and undergoing chaotic motion (Figure [\[fig:individual\]](#fig:individual){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:individual"}). This particle appeared to be trapped in other MMRs during the remainder of the simulation, including the 1:2 resonance at 425,000 years and the 2:1 resonance at 725,000 years, shortly before accretion. Many unstable particles showed similar orbital motion that varied dramatically over the course of the simulation, spending some time apparently trapped in MMRs between periods of more chaotic motion, eventually being ejected or accreted as the eccentricity approached unity. Particles that collided with the planet also showed such motion, but failed to reach highly-eccentric orbits before being removed early in the simulation. The final fates of particles were influenced by their starting locations: Particles that were accreted generally retained an apocentre near the planet, increasing in eccentricity through scattering until pericentre reached the surface of the star. Particles that were ejected often did so with a pericentre near the planet, as both the SMA and eccentricity increased. Because of this behavior, a larger fraction of unstable particles starting interior to the planet were accreted (24 per cent) than exterior (14 per cent). However, particles were lost via all three mechanisms in both starting regions due to chaotic motion. The higher-density MMR simulations were analysed separately and showed consistency with the above results, including behaving as islands: particles starting very near to some low-order MMRs, such as the 2:3 and 3:2 resonances, were much more stable than the surrounding particles (Figure [\[fig:res23\]](#fig:res23){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:res23"}, top). Additionally, the 2:1 resonance was found to be a major source of accreted particles at late times. Within 0.1 au of the resonance, 15 out of 16 unstable particles were accreted and 11 of those survived more than 1 million years. The \(e=0.2\) populations in each MMR were also stable in some of the same locations, but in general had shorter lifetimes. This result was evidence that such particles would be more rapidly removed from a planetary system, and TPs that were started on circular orbits more accurately represented the material around a star that would exist at later times. Since our primary interest was the behavior of TPs at late times, this result reinforced our decision to use the particles on circular orbits for the large scale simulations. # Results for range of eccentricities and masses {#sec:msresults} To investigate the effect of planetary properties on the stability of surrounding bodies, we repeated the previous simulation for each combination of four planetary masses and five orbital eccentricities. We chose the mass values 0.03, 0.3, 1.0, and 4.0 M\(_\mathrm{Jup}\) and the eccentricities 0.02, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 to probe the wide range in orbits of known exoplanets. Aside from eccentricity and mass, all planets started with the same initial conditions in all simulations, such as mean anomaly and argument of pericentre. The SMA remained 4 au for all simulations as well, as probing a third dimension of parameter space would have been too computationally expensive. ## Mass Effects {#sec:MSmass} Our simulations showed that the total number of particles accreted by the star decreased with increasing planetary mass for all but the most eccentric planets (Figure [\[fig:msmasslost\]](#fig:msmasslost){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:msmasslost"}, bottom, blue lines). Two factors contributed to this weak dependence: the size of the unstable region and the fraction of unstable particles accreted by the star. We found that while a larger planetary mass corresponded to a larger ECZ and a higher total number of unstable particles (black lines), it dramatically reduced the fraction accreted (Figure [\[fig:msmasslost\]](#fig:msmasslost){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:msmasslost"}, top, blue lines). This reduced fraction more than offset the increased ECZ size, reducing the total number of particles accreted. The physical cause of this relationship is the strength of gravitational interactions: while the \(\ge 1\) M\(_\mathrm{Jup}\) planets rapidly ejected most particles, smaller planets repeatedly interacted more weakly with the TPs and allowed them to slowly diffuse inward and be accreted by the star. In addition to changing the fraction of TPs accreted and ejected, planetary mass also affected the time-scale for instability to set in. Physically, more-massive planets are more capable of removing small bodies after a single scattering event, while smaller planets depend on the cumulative effect of multiple scatterings. As a result, the TPs in simulations with massive planets had shorter lifetimes than those in simulations with small planets. Figure [\[fig:histlifetimes\]](#fig:histlifetimes){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:histlifetimes"} illustrates this effect with the lifetimes of TPs perturbed by the most massive planet (4 M\(_\mathrm{Jup}\)) and a lower mass planet (0.3 M\(_\mathrm{Jup}\)); Section [6.2.2](#sec:latetimeaccr){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:latetimeaccr"} examines the characteristic lifetimes of particles in greater detail. ## Eccentricity Effects {#sec:ecc} The planetary eccentricity had an equally powerful effect on the TPs. As it increased the pericentre and apocentre of the planet shrank and grew, respectively, which widened the region around the star that the planet probed and expanded the ECZ. As a result, the planet caused a larger number of TPs to be destabilized and accreted (Figure [\[fig:mseccfraclost\]](#fig:mseccfraclost){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:mseccfraclost"}, bottom, black lines). We also found that the eccentricity affected the fraction of TPs accreted, in fact more strongly than the planetary mass (Figure [\[fig:mseccfraclost\]](#fig:mseccfraclost){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:mseccfraclost"}, top, blue lines). Physically, eccentric planets drive the forced eccentricity of particles up to higher values, while simultaneously having more and wider MMRs that can increase the eccentricity of the particles in them. Higher eccentricity causes a higher accretion probability. Finally, increasing planetary eccentricity resulted in the stellar accretion rate peaking earlier, as characterized by the mean accretion time in log space. We discuss this effect in greater detail and with respect to WD accretion in Section [6](#sec:WDsims){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:WDsims"}. In the nearly-circular (\(e=0.02\)) runs, planet-TP collisions dominated the loss mechanism, particularly at low mass. We were not hugely surprised by this behavior, as few TPs had eccentricities pumped to values large enough to eject or accrete. In these simulations most particles maintained a nearly constant Tisserand parameter, defined as \[T=\frac{1}{a/a_p} + 2\sqrt{\frac{a}{a_p}(1-e^2)}\cos I\] Here \(a\) and \(a_p\) are the SMAs of the particle and planet, respectively, while \(e\) and \(I\) are the particle eccentricity and inclination relative to the planetary orbit. For small inclinations, an increase in eccentricity requires the SMA to increase as well. The Tisserand parameter determines the region of parameter space a particle can explore in the presence of a planet with zero eccentricity, including a minimum pericentre. As described in, for an accretion distance of 0.005 au and an ejection distance of 100 au only particles with \(T < 2.1\) or \(T<2.85\) can be accreted or ejected, respectively. With the initial conditions \(e=0\) and \(\cos I\approx1\), all TPs started out with \(T>3\) and were incapable of close approach with the central star. The small eccentricity of 0.02 was enough, however, for particles to deviate slightly from a constant Tisserand parameter and be ejected. Ejections were most common in simulations with the more-massive planets, which were capable of ejecting particles even when on circular orbits. For planetary eccentricities larger than 0.02, the Tisserand parameter was not a constant of motion (due to being derived from the restricted 3-body problem, where the planet is on a circular orbit). As a result, particle eccentricity was frequently increased with no corresponding growth in SMA. ## ECZ width {#sec:ECZ} In the case of a planet on a circular orbit, the interior and exterior edges of the CZ should be equal and scale simply with \(\mu^{2/7}\) as described in Section [2.1](#sec:chaoticzone){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:chaoticzone"}. In our simulations we found that both mass and eccentricity served to increase the size of the ECZ, as shown by the points in Figure [\[fig:ECZwidth\]](#fig:ECZwidth){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:ECZwidth"}. Additionally, we found that the influence of planetary eccentricity served to produce interior and exterior edges at markedly different distances from the planet. To fit the eccentricity-ECZ effect we needed a model with three properties: showed edge asymmetry; increased with planetary eccentricity; and reduced to \(\varepsilon_\mathrm{chaos}=1.5\mu^{2/7}\) for \(e_\mathrm{p}=0\). From a physical standpoint, a particle can be removed from the system when it crosses the path of the planet. Particles within the CZ in the zero-eccentricity case are simply those that undergo chaotic motion, and can therefore enter the path of the planet. For a given planet eccentricity and particle eccentricity, orbital crossing occurs at \[\begin{aligned} a_\mathrm{in} &= a_\mathrm{p} (1-e_\mathrm{p}) / (1 + e_\mathrm{in}') \\ a_\mathrm{out} &= a_\mathrm{p} (1+ e_\mathrm{p}) / (1 + e_\mathrm{out}') \end{aligned}\] where \(a_\mathrm{in}\) (\(a_\mathrm{out}\)) is the inner (outer) edge of the ECZ, and \(e_\mathrm{in}'\) (\(e_\mathrm{out}'\)) is the characteristic eccentricity leading to instability for the inner (outer) region. In this case, \[\begin{aligned} \varepsilon_\mathrm{in} &= \frac{e_\mathrm{p} + e_\mathrm{in}'}{1+ e_\mathrm{in}'}, & \varepsilon_\mathrm{out} &= \frac{e_\mathrm{p} + e_\mathrm{out}'}{1-e_\mathrm{out}'} \end{aligned}\] To determine \(e_\mathrm{out}'\) and \(e_\mathrm{in}'\), both edges were assumed to obey the condition \(\varepsilon(e_\mathrm{p} = 0)=\varepsilon_\mathrm{cz} = 1.5\mu^{2/7}\), the size of the CZ as determined by for a planet on a circular orbit. Substituting for \(e_\mathrm{out}'\) and \(e_\mathrm{in}'\), the edges of the ECZ are defined by \[\begin{aligned} \label{eq:ECZ} \varepsilon_\mathrm{in} &= e_\mathrm{p} (1-\varepsilon_\mathrm{cz}) + \varepsilon_\mathrm{cz}, & \varepsilon_\mathrm{out} &= e_\mathrm{p} (1 + \varepsilon_\mathrm{cz}) + \varepsilon_\mathrm{cz} \end{aligned}\] as shown by the lines in Figure [\[fig:ECZwidth\]](#fig:ECZwidth){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:ECZwidth"}. While this function does not match our results perfectly, it does exhibit the asymmetry and expansion with eccentricity found in our simulation results, and does so with physical motivation. Finally, this model does not explicitly include the increase in resonance width with eccentricity and resulting change in resonance overlap, so it is unsurprising to see deviations from the fit. ## Mean motion resonances {#sec:MMRres} As described in Section [3.3](#sec:singleresults){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:singleresults"}, though many TPs that started in the vicinity of an MMR behaved similarly to the adjacent regions, some were stable inside of the ECZ (islands) and others were unstable outside of the ECZ (holes). Many of these holes became islands as the eccentricity of the planet increased and the MMR went from outside the ECZ to inside of it. In the case of 1 M\(_\mathrm{Jup}\), the 1:2 resonance at 6.4 au changed from nearly the only unstable location outside of the ECZ at \(e=0.02\) to the only region of instability inside the ECZ at \(e=0.4\) (Figure [\[fig:MMRchange\]](#fig:MMRchange){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:MMRchange"}). As a result, these holes were more rare in the higher-eccentricity simulations, due to the fact that the nearly all first-order MMRs were contained within the ECZ. Even so, they played an important role in delivering material to the star for some planets. In the case of \(e=0.2\) and the largest masses, 4 M\(_\mathrm{Jup}\) and 1 M\(_\mathrm{Jup}\), the 3:1 resonance had a much higher fraction of TPs accreted by the star. In the 4 M\(_\mathrm{Jup}\) case, 56 per cent of unstable TPs near the MMR were accreted, significantly larger than the accreted fraction of all unstable particle interior to the planet, 13 per cent. We also found that the 1:1 resonance frequently retained TPs through the end of the simulation, for planets of eccentricity of 0.02 and 0.2. Most of these particles were on stable Trojan orbits. The mass of the planet determined the limiting eccentricity for Trojans. While the smallest planet (0.03 M\(_\mathrm{Jup}\)) had Trojans when the eccentricity was up to and including 0.4, the planets with mass 0.3 M\(_\mathrm{Jup}\) and 1 M\(_\mathrm{Jup}\) only saw Trojans for \(e=0.2\) and 0.02. The most massive planet, 4 M\(_\mathrm{Jup}\), only had Trojans at the lowest eccentricity. Finally, we again ran simulations with TP eccentricity matching planetary eccentricity. These simulations, while generally less stable than those with circular TPs, exhibited the same dependencies on planetary eccentricity and mass as those with TPs on circular orbits in all cases. We therefore believe these relationships do not depend strongly on particle eccentricity, though they may depend on particle inclination or longitude of pericentre. ## Comparison with previous work {#sec:QFcomp} Other research has also found similar trends with respect to planetary mass, such as. In both cases, larger planets produced shorter TP lifetimes, higher ejection fractions, and reduced fractions either in the inner system (for ) or accreted by the star (our result). While the total belt size differed in each case, we obtained consistent results for the total number of particles accreted as a function of planetary mass: where saw a weak decrease in the total mass scattered to the inner system as the mass of the planet increased, we saw the analogous result of fewer TPs accreted as the planet mass increased (at non-zero eccentricities). Conversely, our results deviate from those of, who found that the size of the CZ is independent of planetary eccentricity up to values of 0.3 regardless of planetary mass. By running our simulations with the TP initial conditions changed to those of the prior authors (coplanar particles given the predicted forced eccentricity and planetary longitude of pericentre at their initial SMA), we matched their results and thus identified the different starting conditions as the source of discrepancy. While our TPs began with random longitude of pericentre, used the expected forced eccentricity at that location along with the same longitude of pericentre as the planet. Given that our simulations behaved similar for TPs with both planetary eccentricity and zero eccentricity, the difference is likely the longitude of pericentre in conjunction with the forced eccentricity, which can prevent close encounters. Additionally, coplanarity prevents particles from reaching inclined orbits, which often occurred for the unstable particles in our simulations. We also found that even with the changed initial conditions, planetary eccentricity larger than 0.2 still increased the size of the ECZ, albeit in a manner different from Figure [\[fig:ECZwidth\]](#fig:ECZwidth){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:ECZwidth"}. While the external edge remained close to the value expected from Equation [\[eq:duncan\]](#eq:duncan){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:duncan"}, the internal edge changed dramatically, resulting in a much larger ECZ (Figure [\[fig:QFplots\]](#fig:QFplots){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:QFplots"}). This effect was only noticeable in the larger eccentricities, which were not investigated in. Additionally, the effect of eccentricity on the number and fraction of accreted particles, as in Figure [\[fig:mseccfraclost\]](#fig:mseccfraclost){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:mseccfraclost"}, remained. The effect of planetary mass on accretion fraction remained as well, but was markedly weaker. As a result, the number of accreted particles was affected more strongly by the wider ECZ for massive planets, and increased with larger planetary mass. These simulations, along with the results described in Section [4.3](#sec:ECZ){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:ECZ"}, appear to indicate that the initial conditions of the particles play an important role in the some aspects of the system (such as size of ECZ), while other aspects are less affected (like the eccentricity-accretion relation). Therefore the importance of planetary eccentricity on WD accretion cannot be ignored. # Stellar Evolution {#sec:evo} Until this point we have examined the stability of TPs in planetary systems around only an unevolved MS star. However, to estimate the WD accretion rate we also need to account for the reaction of the planetary system to the mass loss that occurs during post-MS evolution. Research shows that stellar evolution can change the stability of some orbits in the system due to the large amount of mass lost during the asymptotic giant branch and to a lesser extent the red giant branch. From a purely gravitational standpoint, the ECZ dependence on the planet-to-star mass ratio (Equation [\[eq:duncan\]](#eq:duncan){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:duncan"}) indicates that the ECZ will widen, due to the decrease in stellar mass. Additionally, the mass dependence of the MMR widths causes them to grow as well, as was shown in. The final mass of a WD can be estimated according to the equation for the empirical initial-final mass relation from: \[\label{eq:massloss} \mathrm{M}_\mathrm{WD}=0.49\exp[0.095\mathrm{M}_\mathrm{MS}]\] Here M\(_\mathrm{MS}\) and M\(_\mathrm{WD}\) are the initial (MS) mass and final (WD) mass, respectively, of the star in solar masses. For stars near a solar-mass star this equation gives a WD mass of 0.539 M\(_\odot\), which is consistent with more recent work on the relation including and. Given adiabatic mass loss, conservation of angular momentum dictates the SMAs of orbiting planets will increase by an amount determined by the initial-to-final mass ratio: \[\label{eq:aexpand} a_f=a_0\left(\frac{\mathrm{M}_\mathrm{MS}}{\mathrm{M}_\mathrm{WD}}\right)\] For a body around a solar-mass star the orbit will expand by a factor of 1.86. A planet with an SMA of 4 au will then reach a new orbit of 7.42 au. Since this orbital expansion affects all bodies in the system equally (ignoring non-gravitational effects), the period ratios between them will remain the same and bodies already in MMR with a planet will remain so. However, the larger planet-to-star mass ratio results in larger widths for MMRs, which can result in new objects entering resonance. The change in central mass also affects the size of the ECZ. From Equation [\[eq:duncan\]](#eq:duncan){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:duncan"} we can predict the magnitude of this increase in the case of zero eccentricity: \[\label{eq:eczexp} \varepsilon_\mathrm{WD}/\varepsilon_\mathrm{MS} = (\mu_\mathrm{WD}/\mu_\mathrm{MS})^{2/7} = (\mathrm{M}_\mathrm{MS}/\mathrm{M}_\mathrm{WD})^{2/7}\] For our star the mass loss should produce a widening of 19 per cent. However, we saw in Section [4.3](#sec:ECZ){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:ECZ"} that eccentric planets do not follow this relation closely. Assuming the edges of the ECZ are actually defined by Equation [\[eq:ECZ\]](#eq:ECZ){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:ECZ"}, which more closely matches our MS simulations, the relative growth would drop with increasing planetary eccentricity. As the eccentricity increases, the contribution from the classic CZ (\(\varepsilon_\mathrm{cz}\)) to the size of the ECZ decreases and the orbital excursions of the planet dominate. The ratio in that case is given by \[\label{eq:eczexp2} \varepsilon_\mathrm{WD}/\varepsilon_\mathrm{MS} = \frac{e_\mathrm{p}(1\pm 1.5\mu_\mathrm{WD}^{2/7}) + 1.5\mu_\mathrm{WD}^{2/7}}{e_\mathrm{p}(1\pm 1.5\mu_\mathrm{MS}^{2/7}) + 1.5\mu_\mathrm{WD}^{2/7}}\] As a result, more-eccentric planets with ECZs following this relation will have a relatively smaller amount of expansion. However, the physical growth of the unstable region (\(\varepsilon_\mathrm{WD}-\varepsilon_\mathrm{MS}\)) will increase with planetary eccentricity for the exterior edge, and the greater fraction of TPs accreted in the presence of an eccentric planet still supports the latter as a better source of pollution. ## Non-gravitational forces {#sec:nongrav} Post-MS evolution can have further implications for the orbits of small bodies due to non-gravitational effects. Wind drag during the giant branches can hinder the ability of small bodies to move outward, causing them to move relative to the ECZ and MMRs of a planet. Furthermore, the luminosity of the star increases dramatically during the giant phases. This brightening can produce a non-negligible Yarkovsky force on some small bodies, moving them inwards or outwards. Both of these effects result in rearrangement of previously stable particles, repopulating some unstable regions and resulting in a new source of WD pollution. The wind resulting from stellar mass loss can strongly affect small bodies, particularly near the star. examined this effect on objects orbiting more massive stars (3--4 M\(_\odot\)) at greater distances (\(>10\) au) than our simulations, and found that wind drag can change the final orbit of even moderately-sized bodies (1--10 km) as well as cause resonance capture for a range of initial conditions. Using our own parameters, we analytically estimated the effect of wind drag on bodies located at 7 au around a 1 M\(_\odot\) star. We found that at this distance 250-m diameter objects moved au-scale distances, and even 10-km diameter objects showed significant changes to their final orbit: roughly 0.04 au inwards compared to the adiabatic case. Assuming a number distribution inversely proportional to size and a disc spanning 7 to 9 au, this wind drag results in approximately 1.5 per cent of the material entering the ECZ. While it depends on the width (due to larger objects moving less) and location of the disc, this order-of-magnitude calculation does indicate substantial amounts of mass can change location for large discs. The Yarkovsky effect depends heavily on the physical properties of the small bodies, including size, shape, composition, and rotational state. However, by following prior research into the topic we estimated the change in SMA through this mechanism. According to, 100-m objects around the Sun have \(\mathrm{d}a/\mathrm{d}t\sim 0.1\) km yr\(^{-1}\) motion for most eccentricities. While changes to the spin states of the object reduce the long-term importance of the Yarkovsky effect during the MS, the brief period over which the giant branches last should result in few (if any) reorientations for objects 1 km in diameter or larger. Smaller objects will likely move rapidly, allowing for large changes in SMA even with reorientation. If we assume this motion scales inversely with the size of the object, the SMA of a 10-km body will then change by 0.0037 to 0.18 km yr\(^{-1}\), or \(2.4\times10^{-11}\) to \(1.2\times10^{-9}\) au yr\(^{-1}\), around an RGB star (average luminosity \(\bar{L}\approx 180 L_\odot\)), depending on the luminosity dependence of this effect: an asteroid with poor heat conduction will see the Yarkovsky effect increase linearly with the surface flux, but efficient heat conduction will reduce the temperature difference between the hot and cold faces and weaken the effect. We account for this uncertainty by considering a scaling of the strength of the effect with stellar luminosity (\(L\)) or with stellar effective temperature (\(L^{0.25}\)). Over the duration of the RGB branch, 80 Myr, the body would move a distance \(\Delta a \approx\)`<!-- -->`{=html}0.002--0.1 au. While this estimate ignores the impact of mass loss (due to the complicated dependence on SMA), it nevertheless illustrates the power of the Yarkovsky effect during periods of high luminosity. Both of these effects also impact the eccentricity of surviving bodies. The Yarkovsky effect is capable of pumping or damping it depending on the spin orientation of the body, while wind drag exclusively causes damping. The latter affects eccentricity more strongly, causing the orbits of small bodies to become more circular during stellar evolution. Meanwhile, neither wind drag nor the Yarkovsky effect excite inclination (the latter as a result of orbital precession caused by the planet ), leaving low-inclination bodies particles to continue on roughly coplanar orbits. Finally, it is important to note that the location and composition of the planet are crucial for its survival during stellar evolution. Planets near the star will be engulfed, while those just outside the envelope can still spiral in due to tidal effects. For massive planets farther out, the high flux received during and after the giant phases might result in planetary evaporation and mass loss. # White dwarf simulations {#sec:WDsims} To determine how stellar evolution affects the stability of orbiting TPs, we ran two sets of simulations. The first used the final orbital elements of the planet and surviving TPs from the MS simulations translated outward; the second used a new set of particles in the region around the WD. ## *In situ* evolved simulations {#sec:evolved} For the simulations that left particles in place during evolution, we first came up with a model for the evolution itself. We used a simple transition in which we reduced the mass of the star linearly over 2700 years, while leaving the planet and TPs *in situ* with the orbital elements they had at the end of the MS simulations. We note that there are myriad ways to model mass loss in post-MS stars, including various durations and time dependencies. Additionally, a more accurate and complicated treatment would include the non-gravitational forces described in Section [5.1](#sec:nongrav){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:nongrav"}. However, this evolution is not our focus and as such we did not consider other, more-complicated models. Furthermore, the orbital expansion does not depend on the time-scale for mass loss, as long as the latter is much longer than the orbital periods (the adiabatic approximation). We implemented the mass loss in our code again using the BS integrator, with the stellar mass reduced by \(5.61\times10^{-6}\) M\(_\odot\) after each 12-day time-step. We chose the duration of the mass loss to minimize computation time while still being adiabatic, which is necessary for Equation [\[eq:aexpand\]](#eq:aexpand){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:aexpand"} to hold. In all the WD simulations the ejection and accretion distances remained the same at 100 au and 0.05 au, respectively. While the radius of a WD is dramatically smaller than that of a MS star, the Roche limit is approximately the same. We also mention that while our MS simulations did not reach the actual MS lifetime of a 1 M\(_\odot\) star (\(\sim 10^{10}\) years), the vast majority of unstable particles were removed by \(10^8\) years (as illustrated by the number lost at late times in Figure [\[fig:histlifetimes\]](#fig:histlifetimes){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:histlifetimes"}). Using the change in loss rates over time, we estimate approximately 30 per cent of the unstable particles in these evolved systems were unstable in the MS system at times beyond \(5\times10^{7}\) years. As such, we were able to approximately remove this contribution to the WD simulations and determine the instabilities introduced by mass loss. The 0.03 M\(_\mathrm{Jup}\) simulations were an exception to this rule, due to longer particle lifetimes, and are addressed in Section [6.1.2](#sec:extsim){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:extsim"}. ### Results {#results} These simulations followed the same eccentricity--fraction-accreted relationship: increasing planetary eccentricity resulted in a larger percentage of unstable particles accreted by the star in all cases (Figure [\[fig:evolost\]](#fig:evolost){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:evolost"}). Unlike the MS simulations, however, this relationship did not correspond to a larger number of TPs accreted in every case. For the 1 and 4 \(_\mathrm{Jup}\) planets at eccentricities of 0.6 and 0.8, the ECZ spanned nearly the entire 10 au disc in the MS, leading to fewer unstable particles in these simulations (Figure [\[fig:evolost\]](#fig:evolost){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:evolost"}, bottom right panels). Had the initial disc extended beyond 10 au initially, it is likely that the more-eccentric planets would have resulted in more unstable particles, similarly to planets with mass 0.03 and 0.3 M\(_\mathrm{Jup}\) and as they did in the MS case. For the simulations with ECZs that did not span the entire disc during the MS, the total number of unstable particles varied more strongly with planetary mass than during the MS. As described in Section [5](#sec:evo){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:evo"}, the ECZ and MMRs widen as a result of mass loss, which produces newly unstable particles. Both the fractional growth in the ECZ (Equation [\[eq:eczexp\]](#eq:eczexp){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:eczexp"}) and absolute change in size depend on planetary mass. Therefore it is not surprising to see this stronger mass dependence on total number of unstable particles. We observed the ECZ expansion in the results of some simulations, but did not see it consistently between masses or eccentricities as a result of small number statistics, particularly in the higher eccentricity cases where few TPs survived from the MS. ### Extended simulation {#sec:extsim} Due to the late onset of instability in the MS 0.03 M\(_\mathrm{Jup}\) case, we expected a significant fraction of unstable TPs to be unstable on time-scales greater than \(10^8\) years, resulting in contamination to the evolved simulations. To combat this issue and the low number of TPs noted above, we repeated the 0.03 M\(_\mathrm{Jup}\), \(e=0.4\) simulation with quintuple the TP resolution (reducing the separation between TPs to 0.004 au) and for a longer duration: \(2\times10^8\) years for the MS and \(1\times10^9\) years for the WD phase. Long computation times prevented us from repeating this simulation for additional planetary masses and eccentricities. Such a high density of TPs remedied the issue of few survivors in the post-evolution simulation, allowing us to better test the potential of a single, ideal planet to pollute a WD without non-gravitational forces. The MS simulation behaved identically to the same planet in Section [4](#sec:msresults){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:msresults"}, with the exception of better statistics and an increased duration. The lost particles peaked near \(5\times10^{6}\) years, and accretion dominated the unstable particles while collisions with the planet occurred infrequently. The extra 100 Myr behaved similar to the prior 50 Myr, showing both accretion events and ejections at a much reduced rate from the peak. Extrapolating from the accretion rate as a function of time, we found that that only \(\sim25\) particles were expected to go unstable in the subsequent 1 Gyr, which allowed us to account for contamination in our next simulation. Finally, as the number of TPs were not a limiting factor in the prior MS simulation, these results do not gain us much more insight. The evolved simulation, however, differed significantly: the increased number of surviving particles and greater duration produced an obvious expansion of the ECZ (Figure [\[fig:extendlifetimes\]](#fig:extendlifetimes){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:extendlifetimes"}). The ECZ expanded by 10 per cent, less than expected in the circular case but larger than expected from Equation [\[eq:ECZ\]](#eq:ECZ){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:ECZ"}, 3.1 per cent. This simulation also displayed the accretion and ejection peaking near \(10^8\) years, as shown in Figure [\[fig:exthist\]](#fig:exthist){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:exthist"}, with the 20-fold increase from MS peak due to both fewer particles unstable on short time-scales (cleared out in the MS) and the larger planetary SMA. Using the MS-simulation extrapolation, we found that that fewer than 25 per cent of lost particles were contaminants. Significant accretion continued to occur up to the end of the simulation, indicating that a planetary system like this, given certain disc properties, could account for the pollution observed in some polluted WDs. We discuss the feasibility of this mechanism in further detail in Section [7.1](#sec:modelfit){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:modelfit"}. ## Repopulated simulations {#sec:repopulated} The second set of WD simulations represented complete repopulation by non-gravitation forces, and we populated these with a completely new set of TPs spaced 0.03 au apart[^1] between 0.06 au and 18.6 au. For consistency with the MS simulations and the effects described in Section [5.1](#sec:nongrav){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:nongrav"}, all particles started at random points on circular orbits. These simulations were similar to the original MS simulations, but with all bodies at greater distances about a reduced stellar mass. As a result, they represented the change in stability of locations within the system, as opposed to the change in stability of individual particles (which showed some small amounts of motion within stable regions during the MS). While complete repopulation of all unstable regions in a system is unrealistic, as much as 1.5 per cent of the mass in a narrow annulus can be expected to move into them during stellar evolution via non-gravitational forces (as described in Section [5.1](#sec:nongrav){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:nongrav"}). Alternatively, planetary systems that are near instability would result in a planet ending up on a new orbit after a scattering; the results of indicate that such scatterings are possible around WDs at late times, and can result in highly-eccentric orbits. ### Results {#sec:ECZevo} As illustrated in Figure [\[fig:wdfraclost\]](#fig:wdfraclost){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:wdfraclost"}, these simulations behaved similarly to those of Section [4](#sec:msresults){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:msresults"},. Increased eccentricity again dramatically increased both the total number of TPs that went unstable as well as the fraction that were accreted by the star, and lower masses again showed equivalent or greater numbers of accreted particles. We noted certain differences between the two sets of simulations, however. Due to the increased distance from the star and the reduced stellar mass, TPs were more weakly bound and a greater fraction ejected in the WD setup. This change can be seen in a comparison of Figures [\[fig:mseccfraclost\]](#fig:mseccfraclost){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:mseccfraclost"} and [\[fig:wdfraclost\]](#fig:wdfraclost){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:wdfraclost"}, and correspondingly led to a smaller accretion fraction. Compared to the extended simulation, the repopulated 0.03 M\(_\mathrm{Jup}\), \(e=0.4\) simulation peaked earlier and had a smaller unstable fraction at late times due to the large contribution from TPs in repopulated regions, which rapidly went unstable. Even so, both the repopulated and the extended models showed agreement in the fraction of particles accreted and ejected, allowing us to extrapolate accretion rates to other masses and eccentricities from our single extended simulation. Additionally, the location of the oldest particles remained the same: the edge of the ECZ. As a result of stellar mass loss and orbital expansion, the width of the ECZ should increase according to Equation [\[eq:ECZ\]](#eq:ECZ){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:ECZ"}. We observed this expansion in our repopulated simulations, illustrated in Figure [\[fig:unstabincrease\]](#fig:unstabincrease){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:unstabincrease"} for a near-circular planet. The sizes of the ECZ were similar to that shown in Figure [\[fig:ECZwidth\]](#fig:ECZwidth){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:ECZwidth"}, and are not plotted. As described in Section [5](#sec:evo){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:evo"}, the relative increase in the size of the ECZ should decrease with eccentricity when it obeys Equation [\[eq:ECZ\]](#eq:ECZ){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:ECZ"}. We found that to be generally the case for the interior edge of the ECZ, which followed Equation [\[eq:ECZ\]](#eq:ECZ){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:ECZ"} closely in both the MS and the WD cases. Figure [\[fig:ECZgrowth\]](#fig:ECZgrowth){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:ECZgrowth"} illustrates this effect, as larger eccentricities generally have ratios closer to one. Conversely, the exterior edge deviated more so from Equation [\[eq:ECZ\]](#eq:ECZ){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:ECZ"} in both cases, and thus displayed greater scatter about the expansion relation. Additionally, the full size of the ECZ may be larger than plotted, particularly for the low mass simulations, as our extended simulation showed further particles becoming unstable at the ECZ edge after \(10^8\) years. Similar to the ECZ, the widths of MMRs should grow with mass loss and thus can be a valuable source of unstable particles. Our results showed this widening of MMRs in some of our simulations, particularly in the case of MMRs interior to massive planets. The 3:1 resonance in our \(e=0.2\), 4 M\(_\mathrm{Jup}\) simulation grew from 0.064 au in the MS case to 0.141 au in the WD case. While the physical width was expected to increase due to the larger spacing between bodies, that effect would only result in a factor of M\(_\mathrm{MS}/\)M\(_\mathrm{WD} = 1.85\), not 2.2 as we saw. In both cases a large fraction of the unstable particles were accreted (9 out of 16 for MS, 9 out of 19 for WD), despite a low fraction (13 per cent for both) of interior TPs accreted overall. Despite starting with fewer TPs than, these simulations support internal MMRs as another potential source of WD pollution. Given the results of our extended simulation in Section [6.1.2](#sec:extsim){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:extsim"}, multiple mechanisms may play a role in the pollution observed. ### Accretion at late times {#sec:latetimeaccr} While the relationship between planetary properties and the total number of particles accreted over all time is interesting, it has little bearing on WD pollution unless that accretion occurs at late times. The results from our WD simulations agreed with our findings in Sections [4.1](#sec:MSmass){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:MSmass"} and [4.2](#sec:ecc){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:ecc"} regarding particle lifetime: both higher masses and higher eccentricities lead to earlier peak times, as shown in Figure [\[fig:WDlosstimesplot\]](#fig:WDlosstimesplot){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:WDlosstimesplot"}. Because of this shift in peak time, the maximum amount of accreted material at late times (above \(10^6\) and \(10^7\) years) did not always occur in the simulations with the largest eccentricity, as shown in Figure [\[fig:WDlatetimes\]](#fig:WDlatetimes){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:WDlatetimes"}. Larger eccentricities increased the pollution at late times only up to a point, above which the pollution was reduced. These peak eccentricities depended on planetary mass: \(e=0.6\) in the case of 0.03 and 4 M\(_\mathrm{Jup}\), and \(e=0.8\) in the case of 0.3 and 1 M\(_\mathrm{Jup}\). Given such large peak eccentricities, we confirm our previous results: in the vast majority of cases, larger planetary eccentricities (and smaller masses) correspond to larger amounts of polluting material. # Discussion {#sec:disc} These simulations clearly show that planetary mass and eccentricity play an important role in the ability of a planet to pollute the central star. Given the mass dependence of both the fraction and the total number of accreted TPs, it appears that planets do not need to be as massive as Jupiter to be a potential source of WD pollution, and such massive planets may in fact not be the prime candidates. The extended simulation of Section [6.1.2](#sec:extsim){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:extsim"} supported the result that small planets deliver as much material or more than massive planets, and at later times, with a 0.03 M\(_\mathrm{Jup}\) planet continuing to deliver material at Gyr time-scales. It would not be unusual for an exoplanet to have these properties: small planets now appear to be more common than large planets, both near the star and further away. Furthermore, a wide range of eccentricities have been detected in exoplanet surveys, up to 0.4 for 0.03 M\(_\mathrm{Jup}\) planets and above 0.8 for 4 M\(_\mathrm{Jup}\) planets. The planetary mass which produces maximum accretion is still uncertain---the smallest of our planetary masses (0.03 M\(_\mathrm{Jup}\)) produced the highest number of accretion events, but it is possible that even smaller masses would produce a higher number. However, it is not clear theoretically or observationally whether sub-Neptune-mass planets can form at several au distances. Such simulations would also be more computationally expensive, and possibly violate the massless-TP assumption. ## The WD disc mass from accretion rates {#sec:modelfit} While our simulations did not reach the times corresponding to the oldest cooling ages of polluted WD (\(>10^9\) years, ), our longest simulation did reach the time-scales of average polluted WDs (\(10^8\)--\(10^9\) years). Determining which planetary properties best cause pollution in a star is only useful if such pollution can match observations, which is set by the disc mass required in our simulations. To determine that mass, we assumed a power law for the loss rate of particles: \[\frac{\mathrm{d}N_\mathrm{lost}}{\mathrm{d}t} =-\frac{\mathrm{d}N_\mathrm{rem}}{\mathrm{d}t}=\frac{N_\mathrm{rem}^{\alpha}}{t_0}\] Here \(\alpha\) and \(t_0\) are constants to be fit by our simulation results, and \(N_\mathrm{rem}\) (\(N_\mathrm{lost}\)) is the number of particles remaining (lost). Solving this equation for \(N_\mathrm{rem}\) gives \[N_\mathrm{rem} = \frac{N_0}{[1 + (\alpha-1)N_0^{\alpha-1}t/t_0]^{\frac{1}{\alpha-1}}} = \frac{N_0}{[1 +t/t_*]^{\frac{1}{\alpha-1}}}\] where \(N_0\) is the initial number of unstable particles (\(N_\mathrm{rem} = N_0-N_\mathrm{lost}\)), another constant to be fit, and \[t_*= \frac{t_0}{(\alpha-1)N_{0}^{\alpha-1}}\] is the characteristic time scale for losing particles. The loss rate as a function of time is then \[\label{eq:dndt} \frac{\mathrm{d}N_\mathrm{lost}}{\mathrm{d}t} =-\frac{\mathrm{d}N_\mathrm{rem}}{\mathrm{d}t} = \frac{N_0}{(\alpha-1)t_*}(1 + t/t_*)^{\frac{-\alpha}{\alpha-1}}\] We determined the values of \(\alpha\), \(t_*\), and \(N_0\) by performing a least-squares fit to the cumulative distribution of lost particles. We selected the evolved extended run (M\(=\) 0.03 M\(_\mathrm{Jup}\), \(e=0.4\)) for fitting due to the larger number of TPs and extended duration. This simulation defined the 'best-case' planet, as higher masses resulted in shorter TP lifetimes and greater ejection fractions while larger eccentricities have yet to be observed above 0.4 for low-mass planets. The best-fitting values were \(\alpha=7.4\), \(t_*=5.41\times10^6\) years, and \(N_0 = 196\) particles. We also fit the cumulative distribution with bins in \(\log_{10}\) space, which gave different values: \(\alpha=19.6\), \(t_*=2.64\times10^6\) years, and \(N_0 = 405\) particles. The data and the fits are shown in Figure [\[fig:cumplots\]](#fig:cumplots){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:cumplots"}. Although the two sets of fitted constants differed greatly, the fits themselves produced similar fractions of material accreted, differing by less than a factor of two at any given time, allowing either fit to work in an estimate of the total unstable disc mass. For the linear-fit values and a time of \(10^9\) years, Equation [\[eq:dndt\]](#eq:dndt){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:dndt"} gives \(1.35\times10^{-9}\) particles removed per year. Dividing by \(N_0\) gives the fractional loss rate, \(6.87\times10^{-11}\) per year. We assume that the 25 per cent contamination from MS unstable material (Section [6.1.2](#sec:extsim){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:extsim"}) affects both the particle loss rate and \(N_0\) equally, so the fraction is unaffected. Examining each loss mechanism individually as a function of time (Figure [\[fig:exthist\]](#fig:exthist){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:exthist"}), we find that the accretion rate equals roughly double the ejection rate after \(10^7\) years, and the planetary collision rate is negligible. Therefore we assume the accretion rate is two-thirds of the total loss rate, or \(\approx4.58\times10^{-11}\) of the initial material per year. We can compare this to the observed accretion rate of polluted WDs, roughly \(10^{8}\) g s\(^{-1}\) for WDs with cooling ages of \(10^9\) years, which gives an initial mass of unstable bodies in this system equivalent to \(6.9\times10^{25}\) g. This mass is roughly 23 times that of the asteroid belt, \(\sim 3\times10^{24}\) g, and one per cent the mass of the Earth (0.01 M\(_\oplus\)). While larger than previous estimates of the total accreted material, this mass is negligible compared to our smallest planet and supports the use of massless TPs. Using the results from Section [6.2](#sec:repopulated){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:repopulated"}, we repeated the calculation for our repopulated simulation with the same mass and eccentricity and found a larger required disc mass: the material in the repopulated regions reduced the fraction accreted at late times and thus the total amount was necessarily larger. More-massive and lower-eccentricity planets, as expected, required even greater initial disc masses, both due to the shorter lifetimes of small bodies (in the case of massive planets) and due to the reduced fraction of accreted material relative to ejected material. Additionally, non-gravitational forces have only a minor effect on the required mass, due to the limited amount of motion provided to large bodies. As such, we conclude that for a planet orbiting at 7.42 au about a 0.539 M\(_\odot\) star with no external companions, an accompanying disc must have at least 0.01 M\(_\oplus\) in unstable material in order to account for the observed levels of WD pollution even in the best case (lowest mass and highest eccentricity) scenario. ## Observational and dynamical disc constraints {#sec:maxmass} To determine whether this result is reasonable in the context of observed debris-disc masses, we extrapolate the total disc mass from the amount of unstable material. To do so, we assume that the unstable material is localized to a region between 11.7 and 12.7 au, beyond which the objects are stable. We make this assumption based on the results of our extended-duration simulation (Section [6.1.2](#sec:extsim){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:extsim"}), in which the majority of unstable particles exterior to the planet were located in that region. We also assume the disc extends to 90 au (expanded from \(50\) au, in analogy with the edge of our solar system ) and has a surface density of the form \(\Sigma(r) = \Sigma_0 (r/r_0)^{-3/2}\). Integrating over the unstable part of the disc and equating that to the result of Section [7.1](#sec:modelfit){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:modelfit"} allows us to determine \(\Sigma_0\), from which we can calculate the total disc mass. Doing so, we find that the total mass, in both stable and unstable regions, is 0.5 M\(_\oplus\), 50 times the unstable mass. This value is strongly dependent on the size of the disc as well as the presence of any other planets, which would carve out additional ECZs and reduce the amount of material remaining at the end of the MS. This mass is not unreasonable, as observed debris discs show dust masses of \(10^{-2}-10^{-1}\) M\(_\oplus\) around stars older than 1 Gyr. Due to the fact that large bodies dominate the mass while small bodies dominate the surface area for most planetesimal size distributions, the total mass of these observed discs can be as much as \(10^{3}-10^{5}\) times larger, well above our requirement. Furthermore, while this mass is much larger than the asteroid belt, the latter may have been substantially thinned out by the peculiarities of Solar System evolution (e.g. ), making such a comparison unnecessarily restrictive. Minimum mass solar nebula estimates yield original masses \(\sim 100\) times larger than the present value, more than enough to meet pollution requirements if concentrated in a narrow region similar to the current asteroid belt. However, while massive discs are not uncommon around MS stars, the question of whether they survive near the star and at late times arises, due to the effect of collisional evolution and radiative forces depleting much of the material over the stellar lifetime. Assuming an infinite collisional cascade, show that such forces result in a maximum disc mass for a given age. This maximum depends on the physical properties of the disc such as width, distance from the star, and the properties of the constituent particles. To determine if our required mass can exist in a disc 10 Gyr old, we calculated the maximum disc mass for both the unstable region and the total disc using the model. At the end of MS, the material will not have moved outward due to mass loss, so the unstable region will span 6.3 to 6.8 au with the entire disc reaching 50 au. Using these disc dimensions, a largest object size of 2000 km, and an assumed particle eccentricity of 0.25 (the forced eccentricity at 6.5 au), we find that the maximum amounts of unstable and total material are \(6\times10^{-5}\) M\(_\oplus\) and \(0.16\) M\(_\oplus\), respectively. While our parameter selections can affect these values and increase the maximum total mass above our 0.5 M\(_\oplus\) requirement, the amount of unstable material is dramatically smaller than what needs to exist to account for WD pollution regardless. The assumption of collision equilibrium holding for all mass sizes has been challenged by, who argue that it is valid only at very late ages and show that massive discs can exist even at 10 Gyr for a range of parameters. We repeated the mass-remaining calculation using their formalism and the same disc parameters, and found that although the total disc mass was relatively unconstrained, the mass in the unstable region was limited to \(10^{-3}\) M\(_\oplus\). These results (shown in Figure [\[fig:discevo\]](#fig:discevo){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:discevo"}) indicate that, while the disc mass can reach larger values at 10 Gyr than in the case, the masses still fall short of what is required to match observed pollution rates when the disc is near the star. Therefore, we determine that collisional evolution prevents a planet with a narrow unstable region from being a major source of WD pollution, unless it is significantly more distant than 4 au during the MS or the star loses a significantly larger mass fraction. Alternatively, if collisional evolution of the material progresses differently from what current models predict, the original reservoirs could be massive enough to supply polluting material, depending on the planetary properties. We should mention that this collisional evolution may prevent the MMR-based mechanism discussed in from being a viable source of pollution as well, due to the massive asteroid belt required (0.35 M\(_\oplus\)) in their simulations. ## Other system parameters While we examined the effects of some planetary-system properties on WD accretion rates in detail, it is useful to consider the impact of other parameters as well. One such parameter is the initial SMA of the planet, which remained constant at 4 au between all our cases. We ran a single simulation to investigate this effect, using a 0.03 M\(_\mathrm{Jup}\), \(e=0.4\) planet with an SMA of 10 au. We found a small decrease in the fraction of particles accreted (from 83 per cent to 78 per cent) but a substantial increase in the fraction of TPs accreted in the last 50 Myr of the simulation, resulting from the increased orbital time-scale. That fraction increased from 3 per cent in the 4 au case to 8 per cent in the 10 au case, indicating that a smaller disc mass (both total and unstable) may be required for planets at larger distances. Farther from the star the maximum disc mass should be greater, potentially allowing a single planet to be a source of WD pollution. As a test, we repeated our calculations to determine the maximum unstable mass in a disc scaled outward by a factor of 2.5. We found that, in a disc located from 15.75 to 17 au with the same eccentricity and maximum object sizes as before, the and approaches predict \(10^{-3}\) M\(_\oplus\) and 0.015 M\(_\oplus\), respectively. Given the potentially-lower disc-mass requirement due to increased late-time accretion, these results indicate that more distant planets and discs may serve as a more-likely source of pollution. The initial stellar mass also plays a major role in system dynamics, determining the orbital expansion experienced by the planet and other bodies. More-massive stars undergo greater mass loss, resulting in a larger expansion and potentially longer lifetimes as described above. The results of predict that this larger expansion would have a correspondingly larger increase in the unstable region, which could result in a larger population of small bodies accreting on to the star. Furthermore, more-massive stars have shorter lifetimes, allowing them to retain more planetesimals. However, the larger separation from the central star would likely reduce the accretion fraction relative to our results, as we saw in the lower fraction for TPs around the WD compared to the MS star. Doubling the stellar mass for some MS simulations, we saw a small increase in the fraction of particles accreted along with a decrease in ECZ size, resulting in fewer total accreted. As a result of the shorter planetary period, the average lifetime of TPs shrank and thus even fewer particles accreted after \(10^7\) years. While we did not simulate the evolved case of this increased stellar mass, we can assume, from the two prior results, that the particle lifetimes would be longer and the accretion fraction less. The magnitude of the accretion reduction would depend on the total mass loss of the star, and therefore the initial stellar mass. # Conclusion {#sec:conc} In this work we have simulated single-planet systems through stellar evolution, allowing us to detail the effect of planetary parameters on the WD accretion rate and determine that, when started in a disc initially at zero eccentricity, planets of mass \(\le0.03\) M\(_\mathrm{Jup}\) and eccentricity \(e\ge0.4\) are the most-efficient perturbers. We find that more-massive planets deliver less material to their host star due to ejecting a much larger fraction of unstable particles, while smaller eccentricities also produce a lower accretion fraction in addition to fewer unstable particles. The mass in planetesimals, while found to be negligible for Jupiter-mass planets, can have dynamical consequences if the mass of the scatterer is too small; the use of massless TPs in simulations thus limits our results to planetary scatterers larger than several Earth masses. Particle lifetime varies inversely with both planetary mass and eccentricity, but the latter relationship is weak relative to the variation in overall accretion amount. These relationships remain for non-zero particle eccentricity, but are significantly weakened when particle longitude of pericentre matches that of the planet. We further find that stellar evolution has an impact as well, widening planetary and particle orbits thus causing an increase in the fraction of particles ejected and a decrease in the overall accretion amount. Longer orbital periods translate into later peak accretion times, which partially offset the latter effect. Additionally, while non-gravitational forces become stronger during stellar giant phases, they play a negligible role in the amount of stellar accretion due to strong dependence on planetesimal size. Most importantly, we have demonstrated that single-planet systems within 8 au of their host WD can deliver the amount of material observed in polluted-WD atmospheres through the scattering of small bodies from reservoirs similar in mass to that which existed early in our own planetary system. These small bodies were assumed to be at random points on circular orbits at the beginning of the MS. For a low-mass, high-eccentricity planet (0.03 M\(_\mathrm{Jup}\), \(e=0.4\)) at an SMA of 7.42 au, \(10^{-2}\) M\(_\oplus\) of unstable material would be required in a disc annulus 1 au wide, which is within observational amounts. However, current models of collisional evolution predict that the accompanying disc cannot retain an adequate reservoir of material, as much of it is ground down to dust and lost from the system. If these collisional models are correct, more distant planets (where disc evolution progresses more slowly) or planets that are scattered to other portions of the disc (as described in ) remain a possible source of pollution. We finish by mentioning that, so far, no planets have been discovered orbiting a WD, regardless of metal pollution or infrared excess. This is unsurprising in the context of our results, given the low planetary mass necessary to destabilize small bodies and the current difficulty in detecting exoplanets around any star at 7 au. With radial-velocity detections limited to greater than \(\sim1\) km s\(^{-1}\) due to pressure broadening of spectral lines, even massive planets are unlikely to be detected in that manner. If planets such as super-Earths and Neptunes are significantly more common than more-massive planets as sources of pollution, then it would further reduce the possibility of detecting them in the future through methods such as direct detection and astrometry.

{'timestamp': '2014-01-23T02:00:24', 'yymm': '1401', 'arxiv_id': '1401.5470', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5470'}

# Introduction {#s1} Charmonium production has long been considered as a clean probe for the Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) matter formed in heavy ion collisions at relativistic energy , due to the color screening of heavy quark potential at finite temperature . When the temperature of the medium becomes higher than the charmonium dissociation temperature \(T_d\), the initially produced charmonia will be destroyed. It is called the anomalous suppression . Therefore the comparison of the final yield of charmonia from heavy ion collisions to that from the corresponding nucleon-nucleon collisions can be used to extract the medium properties in high-energy nuclear collisions . This anomalous suppression induced by the hot nuclear matter effect explains well the experimentally observed charmonium suppression at the Super Proton Synchrotron (SPS)  . However, color screening is not the only hot medium effect in high-energy nuclear collisions. Once the energy is sufficiently high, such as the collisions at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) and the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), many charm quarks are produced . The initially uncorrelated charm quarks \(c\) and \(\bar c\) can recombine into a charmonium. This process is called regeneration . In high-energy nuclear collisions, these two effects are co-existing and their relative strength is energy dependent. At RHIC it turns out that both suppression and regeneration processes are important for understanding the charmonium production . Even before the formation of Quark-Gluon Plasma (QGP), the cold nuclear matter effects affect the charmonium production. Usually three effects are considered in the literatures: (1) The change in the parton distribution function in nucleus which controls the initial parton behavior and strongly depends on the collision kinematics. In the small \(x\) region, the nuclear parton distribution function is clearly suppressed compared to that of nucleon. That is called the shadowing effect ; (2) Cronin effect  which describes the initial gluon multi-scattering with the nucleons prior to any hard scattering and the quarkonium formation. The nature of such collisions can be described as Brownian motion. As a result the transverse momentum distribution of the produced charmonia is broadened; and (3) Nuclear absorption via interaction between charmonia and the primary nucleons which leads to the normal suppression of charmonia . Both Cronin effect and nuclear absorption have been studied in p+A collisions , while a deep understanding of shadowing effect requires e+p and e+A collisions. In order to understand the charmonium production and extract properties of the medium created in high-energy nuclear collisions, one must take into account both cold and hot nuclear matter effects. LHC provides new data on the charmonium production in Pb+Pb collisions at colliding energy \(\sqrt {s_{NN}}=2.76\) TeV . At LHC the initially produced charmonia are strongly suppressed by the hotter, larger and longer lived fireball, hence the regeneration becomes the dominant production source. Different from RHIC where the parton longitudinal momentum fraction \(x\gtrsim 0.01\) is located in the interface between shadowing and anti-shadowing  regions and therefore the shadowing and anti-shadowing effect is not yet very strong (the ratio of parton distribution function in A+A and p+p collisions is between 0.96 and 1.08 for charmonium transverse momentum \(0<p_t<5\) GeV/c, see Fig.7 of Ref.), the collisions at LHC with much smaller \(x\) are in the strong shadowing region , and the shadowing effect plays an important role in the study of charmonium production. In the present study, we will extend our detailed transport approach for charmonium motion in QGP to self-consistently including both the cold and hot nuclear matter effects, and apply it to the charmonium production at LHC energy. The suppression and regeneration mechanisms in the hot medium are reviewed in Section [2](#s2){reference-type="ref" reference="s2"}, and the shadowing effect, the Gaussian smearing treatment for the Cronin effect, and the initial charmonium distribution are focused in Section [3](#s3){reference-type="ref" reference="s3"}. The comparison between the theoretical calculations and the experimental data are shown in Section [4](#s4){reference-type="ref" reference="s4"}. We summarize our study in Section [4](#s4){reference-type="ref" reference="s4"}. # Hot Nuclear Matter Effect {#s2} In order to extract information about the nature of the medium from charmonium production in heavy ion collisions, the medium created in the initial stage and the charmonia produced in the initial stage and in the medium should be treated both dynamically. We employ the well tested 2+1 dimensional version  of the ideal hydrodynamic equations \[\label{hydro} \partial_\mu T^{\mu\nu}=0\] to simulate the evolution of the almost baryon-free medium created at RHIC and LHC, where \(T_{\mu\nu}\) is the energy-momentum tensor of the medium. The solution of the hydrodynamic equations provides the local temperature and fluid velocity of the medium which will be used in the charmonium regeneration and suppression. To close the hydrodynamical equations one needs to know the equation of state of the medium. We follow Ref. where the deconfined phase at high temperature is an ideal gas of gluons and massless \(u\) and \(d\) quarks plus 150 MeV massed \(s\) quarks, and the hadron phase at low temperature is an ideal gas of all known hadrons and resonances with mass up to 2 GeV . There is a first order phase transition between these two phases. In the mixed phase, the Maxwell construction is used. The mean field repulsion parameter and the bag constant are chosen as \(K\)=450 MeV fm\(^3\) and \(B^{1/4}\)=236 MeV to obtain the critical temperature \(T_c=165\) MeV  at vanishing baryon number density. Taking the initialization in Ref.  for the hydrodynamic equations, we get the maximum temperature \(T_0=484\) and \(430\) MeV of the medium at the initial time \(\tau_0=0.6\) fm/c, corresponding respectively to the observed charge number density \(dN_{ch}/dy=1600\) in mid rapidity and \(1200\) in forward rapidity by the ALICE collaboration . Since a charmonium is so heavy, its equilibrium with the medium can hardly be reached, one usually uses a transport approach to describe the charmonium motion in the medium. The charmonium distribution function \(f_\Psi({\bf x},{\bf p},t|{\bf b})\) in the phase space \(({\bf x},{\bf p})\) at time \(t\) in heavy ion collisions with impact parameter \({\bf b}\) is controlled by the Boltzmann-type equation \[p^\mu \partial_\mu f_\Psi =-C_\Psi f_\Psi + D_\Psi. \label{trans1}\] Considering the contribution from the feed-down of the excited states \(\psi'\) and \(\chi_c\) to the finally observed \(J/\psi\) , we should take into account the transport equations for all the charmonium states \(\Psi=J/\psi,\ \psi'\) and \(\chi_c\), when we calculate the \(J/\psi\) distribution. The lose and gain terms \(C_\Psi({\bf x},{\bf p},t|{\bf b})\) and \(D_\Psi({\bf x},{\bf p},t|{\bf b})\) describe the charmonium dissociation and regeneration, and the elastic scattering is neglected since the charmonium mass is much larger than the typical medium temperature. Introducing proper time \(\tau=\sqrt {t^2-z^2}\), space rapidity \(\eta=1/2\ln\left[(t+z)/(t-z)\right]\), momentum rapidity \(y=1/2\ln\left[(E+p_z)/(E-p_z)\right]\) and transverse energy \(E_T=\sqrt {E^2-p_z^2}\) to replace \(t, z, p_z\) and \(E=\sqrt{m^2+{\bf p}^2}\), the transport equation can be rewritten as \[\left[\cosh(y-\eta){\frac{\partial}{\partial\tau}}+{\frac{\sinh(y-\eta)}{\tau}}{\frac{\partial}{\partial \eta}}+{\bf v}_T\cdot\nabla_T\right]f_\Psi =-\alpha_\Psi f_\Psi+\beta_\Psi, \label{trans2}\] where the third term in the square bracket arises from the free streaming of \(\Psi\) with transverse velocity \({\bf v}_T={\bf p}_T/E_T\) which leads to a strong leakage effect at SPS energy , and the loss term \(\alpha_\Psi({\bf x},{\bf p},t|{\bf b}) = C_\Psi({\bf x},{\bf p},t|{\bf b})/E_T\) and gain term \(\beta_\Psi({\bf x},{\bf p},t|{\bf b}) = D_\Psi({\bf x},{\bf p},t|{\bf b})/E_T\) are respectively the charmonium dissociation and regeneration rates. Considering the gluon dissociation \(\Psi + g \to c+\bar c\) as the dominant dissociation process in the hot QGP, \(\alpha\) can be calculated by the gluon momentum integration of the dissociation cross section \(\sigma_{g\Psi}\) multiplied by the thermal gluon distribution \(f_g\) and the flux factor \(F_{g\Psi}\), \[\label{loss} \alpha_\Psi=\frac{1}{2E_T}\int {d^3{\bf k}\over (2\pi)^3 2E_g}\sigma_{g\Psi}({\bf p},{\bf k},T)4F_{g\Psi}({\bf p},{\bf k})f_g({\bf k},T),\] where \(E_g\) is the gluon energy, the cross section \(\sigma_{g\Psi}\) in vacuum can be derived through the operator production expansion with perturbative Coulomb wave function , and the cross section at finite temperature is estimated by taking the geometrical relation between the cross section and the average size of the charmonium state, \(\sigma_{g\Psi}({\bf p},{\bf k},T)=\sigma_{g\Psi}({\bf p},{\bf k},0) \langle r_\Psi^2\rangle(T)/\langle r_\Psi^2\rangle(0)\). The averaged radius square \(\langle r_\Psi^2\rangle\) for the bound state \(\Psi\) can be obtained from the potential model , its divergence self-consistently defines a Mott dissociation temperature \(T_d\) which indicates the melting of the bound state due to color screening. The local temperature \(T({\bf x},t|{\bf b})\) and the fluid velocity \(u_\mu({\bf x},t|{\bf b})\) of the medium in the cross section and the gluon thermal distribution come from the solution of the ideal hydrodynamic equations ([\[hydro\]](#hydro){reference-type="ref" reference="hydro"}). The regeneration cross section is connected to the dissociation cross section \(\sigma_{g\Psi}\) via the detailed balance between the gluon dissociation and reversed process . To obtain the regeneration rate \(\beta_\Psi\), we need also the charm quark distribution \(f_c({\bf x},{\bf q},t|{\bf b})\) in the medium. From the experimental data at RHIC and LHC, the observed large quench factor  and elliptic flow  for charmed mesons indicate that the charm quarks interact strongly with the medium. Therefore, one can reasonably take, as a good approximation, a kinetically thermalized phase space distribution \(f_c\) for charm quarks, \(f_c({\bf x},{\bf q},t|{\bf b})=1/\left(e^{q^\mu u_\mu/T}+1\right)\). Neglecting the creation and annihilation for charm-anticharm pairs inside the medium, the spacial density of charm (anti-charm) quark number \(\rho_c({\bf x},t|{\bf b})=\int d^3{\bf q}/(2\pi)^3f_c({\bf x},{\bf q},t|{\bf b})\) satisfies the conservation law \[\label{cflow} \partial_\mu\left(\rho_c u^\mu\right)=0\] with the initial density determined by the nuclear geometry \[\label{rhoc} \rho_c({\bf x},\tau_0|{\bf b})=\frac{T_A({\bf x}_T)T_B({\bf x}_T-{\bf b})\cosh\eta} {\tau_0} {d\sigma_{pp}^{c\bar c}\over d\eta},\] where \(T_A\) and \(T_B\) are the thickness functions at transverse coordinate \({\bf x}_T\) defined in the Glauber model , and \(d\sigma_{pp}^{c\bar c}/d\eta\) is the rapidity distribution of charm quark production cross section in p+p collisions . # Cold Nuclear Matter Effect {#s3} The initial condition for the charmonium transport equation ([\[trans2\]](#trans2){reference-type="ref" reference="trans2"}) can be obtained from a geometrical superposition of p+p collisions, along with the modification from the cold nuclear matter effect. For the charmonium production, the cold nuclear matter effect includes usually the nuclear shadowing , Cronin effect  and nuclear absorption . At LHC energy, the collision time for two heavy nuclei to pass through each other is much shorter than the charmonium formation time and the QGP formation time, and one can safely neglect the nuclear absorption and just take into account the nuclear shadowing and Cronin effect. The Cronin effect broadens the momentum of the initially produced charmonia in heavy ion collisions. Before two gluons fuse into a charmonium, they acquire additional transverse momentum via multi-scattering with the around nucleons, and this extra momentum would be inherited by the produced charmonium. Inspired from a random-walk picture, we take a Gaussian smearing for the modified transverse momentum distribution \(\overline f^{pp}_\Psi({\bf x},{\bf p},z_A,z_B|{\bf b})\) \[\label{cronin} \overline f^{pp}_\Psi={1\over \pi a_{gN} l} \int d^2{\bf p}_T' e^{-{\bf p}_T^{'2}\over a_{gN} l}f^{pp}_\Psi(|{\bf p}_T-{\bf p}_T'|,p_z),\] where \(l({\bf x},z_A,z_B|{\bf b})\) is the path length of the two gluons in nuclei before their fusion into a charmonium at \({\bf x}\), \(z_A\) and \(z_B\) are the longitudinal coordinates of the two nucleons where the two gluons come from, \(a_{gN}\) is the averaged charmonium transverse momentum square obtained from the gluon scattering with a unit of length of nucleons, and \(f^{pp}_\Psi({\bf p})\) is the momentum distribution for a free p+p collision. The length \(l\) is calculated from the nuclear geometry, and the Cronin parameter \(a_{gN}\) is usually extracted from corresponding p+A collisions where the produced charmonia suffer from only cold nuclear matter effect. Considering the absence of p+A data at LHC energy, we take \(a_{gN}=0.15\) GeV\(^2\)/fm from empirical estimations . Assuming that the emitted gluon in the gluon fusion process \(g+g\to \Psi+g\) is soft in comparison with the initial gluons and the produced charmonium and can be neglected in kinematics, corresponding to the picture of color evaporation model at leading order , the longitudinal momentum fractions of the two initial gluons are calculated from the momentum conservation, \[x_{1,2}={\sqrt{m_\Psi^2+p_T^2}\over \sqrt{s_{NN}}} e^{\pm y},\] where \(y\) is the charmonium rapidity. The free distribution \(f_\Psi^{pp}({\bf p})\) can be obtained by integrating the elementary partonic processes, \[\label{fg} {d\sigma_\Psi^{pp}\over dp_Tdy}= \int dy_g x_1 x_2 f_g(x_1,\mu_F) f_g(x_2,\mu_F) {d\sigma_{gg\to\Psi g}\over d\hat t},\] where \(f_g(x,\mu_F)\) is the gluon distribution in a free proton, \(y_g\) is the emitted gluon's rapidity, \(d\sigma_{gg\to\Psi g}/ d\hat t\) is the charmonium momentum distribution produced from a fusion process, and \(\mu_F\) is the factorization scale of the fusion process. Now we consider the shadowing effect. The distribution function \(\overline f_i(x,\mu_F)\) for parton \(i\) in a nucleus differs from a superposition of the distribution \(f_i(x,\mu_F)\) in a free nucleon. The nuclear shadowing can be described by the modification factor \(R_i=\overline f_i/(Af_i)\). To account for the spatial dependence of the shadowing in a finite nucleus, one assumes that the inhomogeneous shadowing is proportional to the parton path length through the nucleus , which amounts to consider the coherent interaction of the incident parton with all the target partons along its path length. Therefore, we replace the homogeneous modification factor \(R_i(x,\mu_F)\) by an inhomogeneous one \({\cal R}_i(x,\mu_F,{\bf x})\)  \[{\cal R}_i=1+A\left(R_i-1\right)T_A({\bf x}_T)/T_{AB}(0)\] with the definition \(T_{AB}({\bf b})=\int d^2{\bf x}_T T_A({\bf x}_T) T_B({\bf x}_T-{\bf b})\). We employ in the following the EKS98 package  to evaluate the homogeneous ratio \(R_i\), and the factorization scale is taken as \(\mu_F=\sqrt{m_\Psi^2+p_T^2}\). Replacing the free distribution \(f_g\) in ([\[fg\]](#fg){reference-type="ref" reference="fg"}) by the modified distribution \(\overline f_g=Af_g{\cal R}_g\) and taking into account the Cronin effect ([\[cronin\]](#cronin){reference-type="ref" reference="cronin"}), we finally get the initial charmonium distribution for the transport equation ([\[trans2\]](#trans2){reference-type="ref" reference="trans2"}), \[\begin{aligned} f_\Psi({\bf x},{\bf p},\tau_0|{\bf b})&=&{(2\pi)^3\over E_T\tau_0}\int dz_Adz_B\rho_A({\bf x}_T,z_A)\rho_B({\bf x}_T,z_B)\nonumber\\ &\times&{\cal R}_g(x_1,\mu_F,{\bf x}_T){\cal R}_g(x_2,\mu_F,{\bf x}_T-{\bf b})\nonumber\\ &\times&\overline f_\Psi^{pp}({\bf x},{\bf p},z_A,z_B|{\bf b}), \end{aligned}\] where \(\rho_A\) and \(\rho_B\) are the nucleon distribution functions in the two colliding nuclei. Now the only thing left is the distribution \(f_\Psi^{pp}\) in a free p+p collision which can be fixed by data or by some empirical estimations. Since the charmonia in heavy ion collisions at LHC are measured by the CMS collaboration at mid rapidity \(|y|<2.4\)  and by the ALICE collaboration at mid rapidity \(|y|<0.9\)  and forward rapidity \(2.5<y<4\) , one should consider the rapidity dependence of the free distribution \(f_\Psi^{pp}\). The charmonium states measured by the ALICE are reconstructed down to \(p_T=0\) via the \(\mu^+\mu^-\) decay channel at forward rapidity and via the \(e^+e^-\) channel at mid rapidity. From the measurement , the averaged cross section is \(d\sigma^{pp}_{\Psi}/dy=4.1\ \mu\)b at \(|y|<0.9\) and \(2.3\ \mu\)b at \(2.5<y<4\). The ALICE has also measured the transverse momentum distribution in p+p collisions , the combined \(y\) and \(p_T\) dependence for inclusive \(J/\psi\)s at \(2.5<y<4\) can be parameterized as \[\label{ppjpsi} {d^2\sigma^{pp}_\Psi\over dy p_Tdp_T}=\frac{2(n-1)}{(n-2)\langle p_T^2\rangle_{pp}}\left(1+{\frac{p_T^2}{(n-2)\langle p_T^2\rangle_{pp}}}\right)^{-n}{\frac{d\sigma^{pp}_\Psi}{dy}}\] with \(n=5.06\) and \(\langle p_T^2\rangle_{pp}=7.8\)(GeV/c)\(^2\), shown as the lower solid line in Fig.[\[fig1\]](#fig1){reference-type="ref" reference="fig1"}. From the ALICE  and RHIC  data and CEM(Color Evaporation Model)  calculation, the free distribution \(d^2\sigma^{pp}_\Psi/(dy p_Tdp_T)\) for inclusive \(J/\psi\)s at rapidity \(|y|<2.4\) can also be described by the parametrization ([\[ppjpsi\]](#ppjpsi){reference-type="ref" reference="ppjpsi"}) with \(n=4\), \(\langle p_T^2\rangle_{pp}=10\) (GeV/c)\(^2\) and \(d\sigma_\Psi^{pp}/dy=4.1\ \mu\)b, see the other solid line in Fig.[\[fig1\]](#fig1){reference-type="ref" reference="fig1"}. The inclusive \(J/\psi\)s measured by ALICE include the prompt part and the contribution from the B decay. The former consists of direct production and feed down from the excited states, \(30\%\) from \(\chi_c\) and \(10\%\) from \(\psi'\), and the latter comes from the decay of bottomed hadrons. The B decay contributes about \(10\%\)  to the total inclusive yield. Since the ALICE does not separate the two parts from each other, we have to take into count the B decay contribution in our model to compare our theoretical calculation with the ALICE data. CMS experiment has measured the prompt charmonia at high transverse momentum \(6.5<p_T<30\) GeV/c and at mid rapidity \(|y|<2.4\) . Since at the moment there are no p+p data for prompt charmonia in the CMS rapidity region, we employ \(d\sigma^{pp}_\Psi/dy=4.1\ \mu\)b from the ALICE data  for inclusive \(J/\psi\)s in mid rapidity, and then eliminate the B decay contribution by multiplying the inclusive cross section by a factor of \(\left(1-f_B(p_T)\right)\), where \(f_B\) is the B decay fraction. Fig.[\[fig2\]](#fig2){reference-type="ref" reference="fig2"} shows the recent data on the B decay fraction in p+p(\(\bar p\)) collisions as a function of \(J/\Psi\) \(p_T\) . The data can be well parameterized as \(f_B(p_T)=0.04+0.023 p_T\)/(GeV/c). Note that the linear parametrization is rapidity independent in the region we considered. The prompt \(J/\psi\) distribution at mid rapidity \(|y|<2.4\) is shown as the upper dashed curve in Fig.[\[fig1\]](#fig1){reference-type="ref" reference="fig1"}. Since the B decay fraction is approximately rapidity independent, the distribution \(f_\Psi^{pp}\) for inclusive \(J/\psi\)s at mid rapidity \(|y|<0.9\) can be obtained from the prompt distribution at mid rapidity \(|y|<2.4\) and the B decay fraction \(f_B\) shown in Fig.[\[fig2\]](#fig2){reference-type="ref" reference="fig2"}. We now turn to the rapidity dependence of the charm quark production cross section \(\sigma_{c\bar c}^{pp}\) in ([\[rhoc\]](#rhoc){reference-type="ref" reference="rhoc"}). From the ALICE data , there is \(d\sigma_{c\bar c}^{pp}/dy=0.65\) mb at mid rapidity. By taking the FONLL  scaling, we extract \(d\sigma_{c\bar c}^{pp}/dy=0.4\) mb at forward rapidity. Considering the uncertainty in the experimental data and theoretical calculations (see Fig.5 of Ref.), the upper limits of FONLL  and pQCD are often used in models , to estimate the maximum quarkonium production. We take in the following numerical calculations \(d\sigma_{c\bar c}^{pp}/dy\) between \(0.65\) and \(0.8\) mb at mid rapidity and \(0.4\) and \(0.5\) mb at forward rapidity. Note that the shadowing effect changes not only the initial \(J/\psi\) distribution, but also the in-medium \(J/\psi\) regeneration and the non-prompt contribution from the B decay, by reducing the number of charm and bottom quarks. In principle, the shadowing should be centrality dependent. To simplify the numerical calculations, we take in the following a reduction of \(20\%\) for the charm and bottom quark production cross sections, estimated from the centrality averaged EKS98 evolution . # Numerical Results {#s4} ## Centrality Dependence of \(R_{AA}\) We start with the \(J/\psi\) nuclear modification factor \(R_{AA}=N_{AA}/\left(N_{coll} N_{pp}\right)\) as a function of the number of participants \(N_{part}\), where \(N_{pp}\) and \(N_{AA}\) are respectively the numbers of measured \(J/\psi\)s in p+p and A+A collisions, and \(N_{coll}\) is the number of nucleon-nucleon collisions at fixed \(N_{part}\). Our model calculations for 2.76 TeV Pb+Pb collisions and the comparison with the inclusive ALICE data are shown in Fig.[\[fig3\]](#fig3){reference-type="ref" reference="fig3"} at forward rapidity (upper panel) and mid rapidity (lower panel). With increasing centrality, the initial contribution (dot-dashed lines) drops down and the regeneration (dashed lines) goes up monotonously. Considering the uncertainty in the charm quark production cross section, we take the range of cross-sections \(d\sigma^{pp}_{c\bar c}/dy=0.4\) and \(0.5\) mb at forward rapidity and \(0.65\) and \(0.8\) mb at midrapidity, corresponding to the thin and thick dashed lines in Fig.[\[fig3\]](#fig3){reference-type="ref" reference="fig3"}. This uncertainty in the regeneration results in a band for the full result. Different from the collisions at SPS energy where the regeneration can be neglected  and at RHIC energy where the initial production is still a dominant component and the regeneration becomes equivalently important only in very central collisions , the regeneration at LHC energy becomes the dominant source of charmonium production in a wide centrality bin. The competition between the strong dissociation and regeneration leads to a flat structure for the total charmonium production at both forward rapidity and mid rapidity, see Fig.[\[fig3\]](#fig3){reference-type="ref" reference="fig3"}. At forward rapidity where high statistic data are available, our model results well explain the data in semi-central and central collisions with \(N_{part}\gtrsim 100\), and the deviation from the data in small \(N_{part}\) region is probably due to the invalidation of hydrodynamics for the medium and the canonical limit for the charmonium regeneration . At mid rapidity where the data are with large error bars, the model results seem systematically under the data. We have seen the strong competition between the charmonium suppression and regeneration in the centrality dependence of the \(J/\psi\) yield. In order to see the charmonium production and suppression mechanisms more clearly in heavy ion collisions, we turn to the transverse momentum dependence of the yield. Figs.[\[fig4\]](#fig4){reference-type="ref" reference="fig4"} and [\[fig5\]](#fig5){reference-type="ref" reference="fig5"} show the nuclear modification factor \(R_{AA}\) as a function of centrality in different \(p_T\) bins. In addition we make comparisons with ALICE data   (Fig.4) and CMS data   (Fig.5) for inclusive and prompt \(J/\psi\) production, respectively. In our calculation, we considered a reduction of \(20\%\) for the charm quark number due to the strong shadowing effect at LHC energy. We also took a kinetically thermalized charm quark distribution, by assuming strong interaction between charm quarks and the medium. For bottom quarks, we took into account the same reduction for the number in the calculation of \(p_T\) integrated yield. Since bottom quarks are so heavy, their thermalization is unreasonable in nuclear collisions. While the total \(J/\psi\) yield shown in Fig.[\[fig3\]](#fig3){reference-type="ref" reference="fig3"} is not sensitive to the bottom quark transverse momentum distribution, it may change remarkably the \(J/\psi\) yield in a fixed \(p_T\) bin, especially in a high \(p_T\) bin where the bottom quark energy loss becomes important. Inspired from the CMS measurement , we apply a B quench factor \(R_{AA}^B=0.4\) when calculating the non-prompt \(J/\psi\)s in the region of \(5<p_T<8\) GeV/c. Heavy quarks are produced via hard scatterings and their initial momentum distribution is hard. Through interation with the medium, heavy quarks lose energy, and the corresponding \(p_{t}\) distribution becomes steeper. Since the medium is hot and dense, some of the charm quarks are even thermalized. Considering that the regenerated charmonia from thermalized charm quarks in hot medium are mainly distributed in low momentum region, their contribution to the yield decreases with increasing transverse momentum, and therefore the band structure for the total result due to the uncertainty in regeneration disappears in the high \(p_T\) bins \(5<p_T<8\) GeV/c and \(6.5<p_T<30\) GeV/c, see Figs.[\[fig4\]](#fig4){reference-type="ref" reference="fig4"} and [\[fig5\]](#fig5){reference-type="ref" reference="fig5"}. As we have pointed out that the flat platform for semi-central and central collisions comes from the competition between the suppression and regeneration, it vanishes in the high \(p_T\) bins due to the disappearance of the regeneration. The yield in high \(p_T\) bins is characterized by the Debye screening effect on the initially produced charmonia. In this case, there exists a kink for the nuclear modification factor which is located at \(N_{part}\sim 200\) (Fig.4) for \(5<p_T<8\) GeV/c at forward rapidity and \(N_{part}\sim 100\) (Fig.5) for \(6.5<p_T<30\) GeV/c in mid rapidity. Before the kink, the temperature of the fireball is less than the \(J/\psi\) dissociation temperature \(T_{J/\psi}\) and there is \(R_{AA}\sim 0.6\), resulted from the fact that the decay contribution from the excited charmonium states to the finally observed \(J/\psi\)s is about \(40\%\). Starting at the kink, the temperature is higher than \(T_{J/\psi}\) and the \(J/\psi\) suppression becomes more and more important in more central collisions. As one can see from Figs.[\[fig4\]](#fig4){reference-type="ref" reference="fig4"} and [\[fig5\]](#fig5){reference-type="ref" reference="fig5"}, the kink at mid rapidity appears at a lower value of \(N_{part}\) than that at forward-rapidity. This is due to the fact that the medium at mid rapidity is hotter and \(J/\psi\) starts to melt at more peripheral collisions. The model results underestimate the high \(p_{T}\) results a bit, see Figs.[\[fig4\]](#fig4){reference-type="ref" reference="fig4"} and [\[fig5\]](#fig5){reference-type="ref" reference="fig5"}. Part of the discrepancy may due to the fact we have not include the velocity dependence of the dissociation temperature. As discussed in , fast moving charmonia tend to be melt at a higher temperature making the velocity dependence particularly important in high \(p_{T}\) regions. ## Transverse Momentum Dependence of \(R_{AA}\) The transverse momentum distribution of the nuclear modification factor \(R_{AA}(p_T)\) in a fixed centrality bin and its comparison with the ALICE data are shown in Fig.[\[fig6\]](#fig6){reference-type="ref" reference="fig6"} for inclusive \(J/\psi\)s at forward rapidity. We see clearly that, the regeneration (dashed lines) dominants the low \(p_{T}\) regions at all centralities. On the other hands, initially produced \(J/\psi\)s (dot-dashed lines) become important at high \(p_{T}\) region. Therefore, the competition between the suppression and regeneration depends strongly on the transverse momentum and collision centralities. When both the regeneration at low \(p_T\) and initial production at high \(p_T\) are important, there exists a minimum structure located at intermediate \(p_T\), see the upper and middle panels of Fig.[\[fig6\]](#fig6){reference-type="ref" reference="fig6"}. Note that without the regeneration as the second production source, the nuclear modification factor \(R_{AA}\) would decrease monotonously with increasing centrality and increases monotonously with increasing transverse momentum. The \(R_{AA}(p_T)\) for prompt \(J/\psi\)s at mid rapidity is shown in Fig.[\[fig7\]](#fig7){reference-type="ref" reference="fig7"}. While the CMS data are in the high \(p_T\) region where there is almost no contribution from the regeneration and the system is controlled only by the dissociation of the initially produced \(J/\psi\)s, the predicted \(R_{AA}\) at very low \(p_t\) is larger than unity which is not possible without the regeneration mechanism. ## A New Ratio \(r_{AA}=\langle p_T^2\rangle_{AA}/\langle p_T^2\rangle_{pp}\) For heavy ion collisions in the past decades, the colliding energy from SPS to LHC increases by two orders of magnitude, and the heavy quark production cross section increases dramatically. While the transverse momentum dependence of the nuclear modification factor \(R_{AA}\) tells us the importance of the regeneration mechanism, we hope to find a quantity which is more sensitive to the nature of the medium. On the other hand, in our treatment for hot nuclear matter effect, we assumed a thermalized charm quark distribution for the calculation of the regeneration rate, how good is this assumption and how does the charm quark thermalization affect the charmonium distribution? The other question is how to separate the hot nuclear matter effect from the cold nuclear matter effect. To focus on the property of the hot medium, we hope to have a quantity which is sensitive to the hot nuclear matter effect but affected weekly by the cold nuclear matter effect. To these ends, we introduced a new nuclear modification factor for the transverse momentum  \[\label{raa1} r_{AA}={\langle p_T^2\rangle_{AA}\over \langle p_T^2\rangle_{pp}},\] where \(\langle p^2_t\rangle _{AA}\) and \(\langle p^2_t\rangle _{pp}\) are averaged transverse momentum square for \(J/\psi\) in A+A and p+p collisions, respectively. To be different from the usually used nuclear modification factor \(R_{AA}\) for the yield, we take here \(r_{AA}\) as the ratio of the second moment of transverse momentum distributions. Since the nuclear matter effect changes not only the size of the transverse momentum but also its shape, we focus on \(\langle p_T^2\rangle\) instead of \(\langle p_T\rangle\). It is worthy to note that the second moment of the \(p_{T}\) distribution is also sensitive to the Cronin effect but not much affected by the parton distribution functions. The calculation and the comparison with experimental data at SPS, RHIC and LHC energies are shown in Fig.[\[fig8\]](#fig8){reference-type="ref" reference="fig8"} for two rapidity bins. In mid rapidity where the hot nuclear matter effect is most important, the ratio changes significantly with increasing colliding energy, \[\label{raa2} r_{AA}\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} >1 &\textrm{SPS}\\ \sim 1 &\textrm{RHIC}\\ <1 &\textrm{LHC} \end{array} \right. \ \ \ \ \text {at mid rapidity},\] see the upper panel of Fig.[\[fig8\]](#fig8){reference-type="ref" reference="fig8"}. At SPS, almost all the measured \(J/\psi\)s are produced through initial hard processes and carry high momentum. The continuous increasing with centrality arises from the Cronin effect and leakage effect . The latter is described by the third term on the left hand side of the transport equation ([\[trans2\]](#trans2){reference-type="ref" reference="trans2"}) and means that the high \(p_T\) \(J/\psi\)s can escape from the hot medium. At RHIC, the regeneration starts to play a role and even becomes equally important as the initial production in central collisions , the cancelation between the suppression and regeneration leads to a flat \(r_{AA}\) around unity. At LHC, the regeneration becomes dominant, especially in central collisions. Since the regenerated charmonia carry low momentum in comparison with the initial production, the more and more important regeneration results in a decreasing \(r_{AA}\) with increasing centrality. This tremendous change in the \(p_T\) ratio comes from the nature of the hot medium at each corresponding collision energy. Our calculation agrees well with the data at SPS and RHIC energies. At LHC energy there are currently no data at mid rapidity. The band structure at LHC is again from the uncertainty in the charm quark production cross section. Note that, different from the ratio \(R_{AA}\) for the yield where the lower and higher borders of the band correspond to the smaller and larger cross sections, the relation between the two borders of \(r_{AA}\) and the cross section is in an opposite way, namely, the lower and higher borders here correspond to the larger and smaller cross sections. Intuitively this is simple to understand: In the case of larger charm quark cross section, more \(J/\psi\)s are from the regeneration and then carry low momentum. To have a comparison with the LHC data, we calculated the ratio \(r_{AA}\) in the forward rapidity where the hot medium effect becomes weaker. In this case the trend of the ratio is still very different at RHIC and LHC: With increasing centrality it goes up at RHIC but drops down at LHC. \[\label{raa3} r_{AA}\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} >1 &\textrm{RHIC}\\ <1 &\textrm{LHC} \end{array} \right.\ \ \ \ \text{at forward rapidity},\] see the lower panel of Fig.[\[fig8\]](#fig8){reference-type="ref" reference="fig8"}. The calculation agrees well with both the RHIC and LHC data. After a careful inspecting the centrality dependence of \(r_{AA}\), one can find a common feature in all cases, namely, \(r_{AA}\) in peripheral collisions is always increasing as the centrality increases. In case the initial production is dominant, the ratio continues to increase, while strong regeneration from thermalized charm quarks pulls the ratio down below unity in more central collisions. In order to see if charm quarks are thermalized with the hot medium, we calculate now the ratio \(r_{AA}\) at LHC energy with a pQCD simulated charm quark distribution, shown in the upper panel of Fig.[\[fig9\]](#fig9){reference-type="ref" reference="fig9"} at forward rapidity. The thermal distribution is the limit of strong interaction between charm quarks and the medium, while the pQCD distribution taken from the simulator PYTHIA  is the limit of no interaction. For the pQCD distribution, the charm quark energy loss is excluded, the initially produced charm quarks keep their high momentum in the medium, and therefore the regenerated charmonia will be no longer soft but carry high momentum. In this case, the averaged transverse momentum is enhanced at the forward rapidity and the ratio \(r_{AA}\) becomes larger than the one with thermal distribution, see the upper panel of Fig.[\[fig9\]](#fig9){reference-type="ref" reference="fig9"}. Again the band is due to the uncertainty in the charm quark cross section. From the comparison with the ALICE data, we conclude that charm quarks are thermalized in high-energy nuclear collisions at the LHC energy. In the above calculations we have taken a reduction of \(20\%\) for the charm and bottom quark distributions in the medium, due to the shadowing effect. This reduction leads to an extra charmonium suppression. Supposing the total number of initially produced charm quarks is \(n_c\), the regenerated charmonium number is then proportional to \(n_c^2\) if we do not take into account the shadowing effect and \((0.8n_c)^2=0.64n_c^2\) when the shadowing effect is included. However, the averaged transverse momentum square \(\langle p_T^2\rangle\) is a normalized quantity, it should not be so sensitive to the shadowing effect. The comparison between the calculations with and without considering the shadowing effect is shown in the lower panel of Fig.[\[fig9\]](#fig9){reference-type="ref" reference="fig9"}. As we expected, the two bands are very close to each other and overlap partly. This indicates that the nuclear modification factor \(r_{AA}\) for charmonium transverse momentum can be used to extract the hot medium information with only small correction from the early shadowing effect. ## Elliptic Flow \(v_2\) Since the elliptic flow originates from the geometric anisotropy in the configuration space and develops in the evolution of the hot medium, it is significant in semi-central collisions and approaches to zero in peripheral and central collisions. As far as the charmonium concern, those that produced from the initial collisions prior to the formation of the hot medium will not present any significant elliptic flow, see the dot-dashed line in the upper panel of Fig.[\[fig10\]](#fig10){reference-type="ref" reference="fig10"}. The regenerated \(J/\psi\)s, on the other hand, may inherit flow from the thermalized charm quarks, as shown by the dashed line. Through interactions, the initial anisotropy in the configuration space is converted into the anisotropy in momentum space for all final hadrons. The full \(J/\psi\) \(v_{2}\) is shown as the solid line in the upper panel of Fig.[\[fig10\]](#fig10){reference-type="ref" reference="fig10"}. Note that a sizable \(v_{2}\) has been developed at LHC. Unlike the light charged hadrons where \(v_{2}\) persist with large values up to high \(p_{T}\) region, the \(J/\psi\) \(v_{2}\) quickly drops to the value from initial production with \(v_{2}\leq 1\%\). Up to now, our discussion on \(J/\psi\) \(v_2\) is focused on the prompt \(J/\psi\). Once we include the \(J/\psi\) from bottom quark decay, new scenarios arise. The lower panel of Fig.[\[fig10\]](#fig10){reference-type="ref" reference="fig10"} shows the elliptic flow \(v_{2}\) for inclusive \(J/\psi\)s at forward rapidity where the bottom decay is included. As one can see in the plot, the \(J/\psi\) \(v_2\) from the decay of the initially (or pQCD) produced bottom quarks quickly falls to close to zero at \(p_T\sim 5\) GeV/c. However, the \(J/\psi\)s from thermalized bottom decay show significant value of \(v_{2}\) at high \(p_T\) region. At this point, the error of the experimental data is too large to draw any conclusion of bottom quark thermalization. Our calculation predicts that future precise \(J/\psi\) \(v_{2}\) at high \(p_{T}\) will provide important information on bottom production in high energy nuclear collisions. # Conclusion We have studied the cold and hot nuclear matter effects on charmonium production in relativistic heavy ion collisions. In the framework of a transport approach for the charmonium motion plus a hydrodynamic description for the medium evolution, we calculated the charmonium transverse momentum distribution and the corresponding ratios \(R_{AA}\) and \(r_{AA}\) in different rapidity and centrality bins. Our model calculations agree reasonably well with the experimental data at SPS, RHIC and LHC energies. We found that, in comparison with the often used nuclear modification factor \(R_{AA}=N_{AA}/\left(N_{coll}N_{pp}\right)\), based on the charmonium yield, the newly defined nuclear modification factor \(r_{AA}=\langle p_T^2\rangle_{AA}/\langle p_T^2\rangle_{pp}\), based on the charmonium transverse momentum distribution, is more sensitive to the nature of the hot medium and to the degree of heavy quark thermalization. When the colliding energy increases from SPS to LHC, the \(p_T\) \(r_{AA}\) changes dramatically from above unity and increasing as a function of collision centrality to below unity and decreasing versus centrality. Different from the yield \(R_{AA}\) which is strongly affected by both the cold and hot nuclear matter effects, the \(p_T\) \(r_{AA}\) is weekly affected by the shadowing effect. In addition, we observed that the \(J/\psi\) elliptic flow \(v_{2}\) for minimum bias events evolves from almost zero at RHIC to a large value similar to that of light hadrons at LHC. The root for these observed dramatic changes is the formation of the strongly coupled quark-gluon plasma and the thermalization of charm quarks in high energy nuclear collisions at the LHC energy. The work is supported by the NSFC, the MOST and the DOE grant Nos. 11221504, 11335005, 11275103, 2013CB922000, 2014CB845400, and DE-AC03-76SF00098.

{'timestamp': '2014-06-04T02:05:53', 'yymm': '1401', 'arxiv_id': '1401.5845', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5845'}

# Introduction {#section0} Consider the asymmetrically perturbed Duffing oscillator \[\begin{aligned} \label{f} X_{\lambda}: \left\{\begin{array}{ccl} \dot{x}&=&y \\ \dot{y}&=&x-x^{3}+\nu x^2+ \lambda_{0}y+\lambda_{1}xy+\lambda_{2}x^{2}y \end{array}\right. \end{aligned}\] in which \(\nu, \lambda_i\) are small real parameters. For \(\nu=\lambda_1=\lambda_2=\lambda_3=0\) the system is integrable, with a first integral \[H= \frac{y^2}{2}-\frac{x^2}{2} + \frac{x^4}{4}\] and its phase portrait is shown on fig.[\[fig1\]](#fig1){reference-type="ref" reference="fig1"}. Alternatively, the system ([\[f\]](#f){reference-type="ref" reference="f"}) defines a real plane foliation by the formula \[d(H-\nu \frac{x^3}{3})+ ( \lambda_{0}+\lambda_{1}x+\lambda_{2}x^{2}) ydx = 0 \label{ff}\] The cyclicity of the exterior period annulus of this system with respect to the perturbation ([\[f\]](#f){reference-type="ref" reference="f"}) is equal to two, as it has been shown by Iliev and Perko and Li, Mardesic and Roussarie. Let \(\{\gamma(h)\}_h\) be the continuous family of exterior ovals of the non-perturbed system, where \[\gamma(h)~\subset\{H=h\}\] and consider the complete elliptic integrals \[\begin{aligned} \label{3} I_{i}&=&\oint_{\gamma(h)} x^{i}y dx. \end{aligned}\] It has been shown in, that if we restrict our attention to a one parameter deformation \[\lambda_i=\lambda_i(\varepsilon), \nu= \nu (\varepsilon)\] then the first non-vanishing Poincaré-Pontryagin-Melnikov function \(M_k\) (governing the bifurcation of limit cycles) is given by a linear combination of the complete elliptic integrals of first and second kind \(I_0,I_2, I_4'\) \[\label{mk} M_k(h)= \lambda_{0k}I_0(h)+ \lambda_{2k}I_2(h) + \lambda_{4k}I_4'(h).\] It is shown further, by making use of Picard-Fuchs equations combined with Rolle's theorem in a real domain, that the space of elliptic integrals of first and second kind \(I_0,I_1,I_4'\) satisfy the Chebishev property. The method is described in details in . This result is further generalized for multi-parameter deformations. It turns out that the Bautin ideal associated to the deformation can be always principalized (this is a general fact), and that the leading term of the displacement map is given by a function of the form ([\[mk\]](#mk){reference-type="ref" reference="mk"}), which completes the proof of Theorem [\[cyclicity\]](#cyclicity){reference-type="ref" reference="cyclicity"}, see for details. The purpose of the present paper is to study the number of the zeros of the family \(\{I_0,I_1,I_4'\}\) in the complex domain \({\cal D} = {\mathbb C} \setminus (-\infty,0]\). We use the well known Petrov method which is based on the argument principle. To find the exact number of zeros we construct the bifurcation diagram of zeros of \(M_k\) in \({\cal D}\) in the spirit of. The result is summarized in Theorem [\[main\]](#main){reference-type="ref" reference="main"}. This gives an information on the complex limit cycles of the system, and imples in particular that the number of corresponding limit cycles can not exceed three. It can be also seen as a complex counterpart of Theorem [\[cyclicity\]](#cyclicity){reference-type="ref" reference="cyclicity"}. Our primary motivation was that the complex methods we use, are necessary to understand the bifurcations from the separatrix eight-loop, see Remark [\[rem1\]](#rem1){reference-type="ref" reference="rem1"} above. Another reason is, that the complexity of the bifurcation set of \(M_k\) in a complex domain is directly related to the number of the zeros of \(M_k\). This observation can be possibly generalized to higher genus curves. The paper is organized as follows. In section [2](#section1){reference-type="ref" reference="section1"} we recall some known Picard-Fuchs equations, which will be used later. The monodromy of the Abelian integrals, based on the classical Picard-Lefschetz theory is described in section [3](#monodromy){reference-type="ref" reference="monodromy"}. The Petrov method is then applied in section [4](#zeros){reference-type="ref" reference="zeros"}. The main result is that the principal part of the first rerun map can have at most four zeros in a complex domain, a result which is not optimal-see Lemma [\[z3\]](#z3){reference-type="ref" reference="z3"}. The exact upper bound for the number of the zeros in a complex domain turns out to be three. This result, together with the bifurcation diagram of zeros in a complex domain is given in section [5](#section5){reference-type="ref" reference="section5"}. # Picards-Fuchs equations {#section1} The results of this section are known, or can be easily deduced, see. First we note that the affine algebraic curve \[\Gamma_h= \{(x,y)\in \mathbb{C}: H(x,y)=h \}\] is smooth for \(h \neq 0,-1/4\) and has the topological type of a torus with two removed points \(\infty^\pm\) (at \"infinity\"). Its homology group is therefore of rang three, the corresponding De Rham group has for generators the (restrictions of) polynomial differential one-forms \[ydx, \;xy dx, \;x^2ydx\] which are also generators of the related Brieskorn-Petrov \(\mathbb{C}[h]\)-module. Because of the symmetry \((x,y)\rightarrow (\pm x,y)\) the Abelian integrals \(I_{2k+1}(h)\) vanish identically, while \(I_{2k}\), as well their derivatives can be expressed as linear combinations of \(I_0, I_2\), with coefficients in the field \(\mathbb{C}(h)\). The above equations imply the following asymptotic expansions near \(h=0\) (they agree with the Picard-Lefshetz formula) # The monodromy of Abelian integrals {#monodromy} The Abelian integrals \(I(h)\) of the form ([\[3\]](#3){reference-type="ref" reference="3"}) are multivalued functions in \(h\in \mathbb{C}\) which become single-valued analytic functions in the complex domain \[{\cal D}= \mathbb{C} \setminus [0,-\infty).\] Along the segment \([0,-\infty)\) the integrals have a continuous limit when \(h\in {\cal D}\) tends to a point \(h_0\in [0,-\infty)\), depending on the sign of the imaginary part of \(h\). Namely, if \(Im (h)>0\) we denote the corresponding limit by \(I^+(h)\), and when \(Im (h)>0\) by \(I^-(h_0)\). We use a similar notation for the continuous limits of loops \(\gamma(h)\) when \(h\) tends to the segment \([0,-\infty)\). We have therefore \[I^\pm(h)= \int_{\gamma^\pm(h)} \omega\] where \(\omega\) is a polynomial one-form. The monodromy \(I^+(h)-I^-(h)\), \(h\in [0,-\infty)\) depends therefore on the monodromy of \(\gamma(h)\) which is expressed by the Picard-Lefscetz formula. Namely, for \(h\in {\cal D}\), define the continuous families of closed loops \[\delta_0(h), \delta_1(h), \delta_{-1}(h)\] which vanish at the singular points \((0,0), (0,1), (0,-1)\) when \(h\) tends to \(0\) or \(-1/4\) respectively, and in such a way that \(Im (h) > 0\), see fig.[\[figdelta\]](#figdelta){reference-type="ref" reference="figdelta"}. This defines uniquely the homology classes of the loops, up to an orientation. From now on we suppose that the loop \(\gamma(h)\) for \(h>0\) is oriented by the vector field \(X_0\), and that the orientation of \(\delta_0(h), \delta_1(h), \delta_{-1}(h)\) are chosen in such a way that \[\gamma(h) = \delta_0(h) + \delta_1(h) + \delta_{-1}(h), \, h \in \cal D.\] According to the definition of the vanishing cycles \[\gamma^+(h) = \delta^+_0(h) + \delta^+_1(h) + \delta^+_{-1}(h), h\in (-\infty,0]. \label{gplus}\] and the Picard-Lefschetz formula implies \[\gamma^-(h)=-\delta^+_0(h) + \delta^+_1(h) + \delta^+_{-1}(h), h\in [-1/4,0] \label{gminus1}\] and \[\gamma^-(h)=-\delta^+_0(h), h\in (-\infty,-1/4] \label{gminus2}\] For a further use we note that \[\delta^-_0(h)= \delta^+_0(h), h\in (-1/4,+\infty) \label{d0}\] \[\delta^-_1(h)= \delta^+_1(h), \delta^-_{-1}(h)= \delta^+_{-1}(h), h\in (-\infty, 0) \label{d1}\] # The zeros of the principal part of the first return map in a complex domain {#zeros} If he first Poincaré-Pontryagin-Melnikov function \(M_1(h)\) is not identically zero, then \[\label{first} M_1(h) = \lambda_0 I_0(h) + \lambda_2 I_2, \lambda_i \in \mathbb{R}\] If \(M_1=0\) the first non-vanishing Melnikov function \(M_k\) can have a more complicated form, and its general form according to, is \[\label{principal} M(h) = \lambda_0 I_0(h) + \lambda_2 I_2+ \lambda_4 I'_4(h)(h), \lambda_i \in \mathbb{R}\] Following, we call the Abelian integral \(M(h)\) *the principal part of the first return map* of the system ([\[f\]](#f){reference-type="ref" reference="f"}), associated to the exterior period annulus of \(X_0\). # The bifurcation diagram of the zeros of the Abelian integrals in a complex domain {#section5} ## The first Melnikov function \(M_1\) Let \(Z(M_1)\) be the number of the zeros of \(M_1(h)\) in the domain \({\cal D}\), counted with multiplicity. It is a function of \([\lambda_0:\lambda_2]\) seen as a point on the projective circle \(S^1=\mathbb{R}\mathbb P^1\). The bifurcation set \({\mathbf B}\) of \(Z(M_1)\) is the set of points \([\lambda_0:\lambda_2]\in \mathbb{R}\mathbb P^1\) at which \(Z(M_1)\) is not a locally constant function. It follows that if \(\lambda=[\lambda_0:\lambda_2]\) is a bifurcation point, then near \(\lambda\) a zero of \(M_1(h)\) bifurcates from the border of the domain \({\cal D} \subset \mathbb{C}{\mathbb P}^1\), see. Therefore \[{\bf B} = P_0\cup P_{-1/4}\cup P_\infty \cup \Delta\] where \(P_0, P_{-1/4}, P_\infty\in S^1\) are the sets of parameter values \(\lambda\), corresponding to bifurcations of zeros from \(h=0\), \(h=-1/4\) and \(h=\infty\) respectively. Finally, \(\Delta\) is the set corresponding to bifurcations from the branch cut \((-\infty,0)\). The results of the preceding section imply \(\Delta= \emptyset\) while \[P_0= \{ [\lambda_0 :\lambda_2]: \lambda_0 I_0(0)+\lambda_2 I_2(0) = 0 \}, P_{-1/4}= \{ [\lambda_0 :\lambda_2]: \lambda_0 I_0(-\frac14)+\lambda_2 I_2(-\frac14) = 0 \}\] and \[P_\infty = \{ [\lambda_0 :\lambda_2]: \lambda_2=0 \}.\] A local analysis shows that when the parameter \([\lambda_0:\lambda_2]\) crosses \(P_0\) or \(P_\infty\), then a simple zero bifurcates from \(0\) or \(\infty\). Similarly, two complex conjugate zeros bifurcate from \(h=-1/4\) when \([\lambda_0:\lambda_2]\) crosses \(P_{-1/4}\). This combined with Lemma [\[z1\]](#z1){reference-type="ref" reference="z1"} implies ## The principal part \(M\) of the first return map. {#bifurcation} Let \(Z(M)\) be the number of the zeros of \(M(h)\) in the domain \({\cal D}\), counted with multiplicity. It is a function of \([\lambda_0:\lambda_2: \lambda_4]\) seen as a point on the projective sphere \(\mathbb{R}\mathbb P^2\). The bifurcation set \({\mathbf B}\) of \(Z(M)\) is the set of points \([\lambda_0:\lambda_2: \lambda_4]\in \mathbb{R}\mathbb P^2\) at which \(Z(M)\) is not a locally constant function. It follows that if \(\lambda=[\lambda_0:\lambda_2: \lambda_4]\) is a bifurcation point, then near such a \(\lambda\) a zero of \(M(h)\) bifurcates from the border of the domain \({\cal D} \subset \mathbb{C}{\mathbb P}^1\), see. Therefore \[{\bf B} = l_0\cup l_{-1/4}\cup l_\infty \cup \Delta\] where \(l_0, l_{-1/4}, l_\infty\) are the sets of parameter values \(\lambda\), corresponding to bifurcations of zeros from \(h=0\), \(h=-1/4\) and \(h=\infty\) respectively. Finally, \(\Delta\) is the set corresponding to bifurcations from the branch cut \((-\infty,0)\). We are going to describe these sets explicitly. As \(I'_4(0) \neq 0\), then \[l_0= \{\lambda\in \mathbb{R}\mathbb P^2: \lambda_0 I_0(0) + \lambda_2 I_2(0)+\lambda_4 I'_4(0) = 0 \}. \label{l0}\] Similarly, \[l_\infty = \{ \lambda\in \mathbb{R}\mathbb P^2: \lambda_2 = 0 \}. \label{linfty}\] A local analysis shows that \(I'_4(h) \sim const. \times \log(4h+1)\) near \(-1/4\) which implies \[l_{-1/4} = \{ \lambda\in \mathbb{R}\mathbb P^2: \lambda_4 = 0 \}. \label{l14}\] Finally, to compute \(\Delta\) we suppose that for some \(h\in (-\infty,-1/4) \cup (-1/4,0)\), \(M(h)=\overline{M(h)}=0\). The latter implies \(Im( I(h))=0\), and hence \(\alpha(h)=0\) and \(\beta(h)=0\), see ([\[fh\]](#fh){reference-type="ref" reference="fh"}). The condition, that the polynomials \(\alpha(h), \beta(h)\) have a common real root imply that either \(\lambda_4=0\) in which case the root is \(h=-1/4\), or \[5(\lambda_0+\lambda_4) + \lambda_2=0 \label{delta}\] in which case \[(4h+1) (\lambda_0I_2(h)+\lambda_2I_2(h)+\lambda_4I'_4(h))= (4h(\lambda_0+\lambda_4) + \lambda_0) (I_0(h)-5I_2(h))\] see ([\[albe\]](#albe){reference-type="ref" reference="albe"}). The Abelian integral \(I_0(h)-5I_2(h)\) vanishes at \(h=-1/4\) and corresponds therefore to the point \(P_{-1/4}\) on fig.[\[diagram2\]](#diagram2){reference-type="ref" reference="diagram2"}. In particular it has no zeros in the domain \({\cal D}\). Thus, in the case when the root of \(4h(\lambda_0+\lambda_4) + \lambda_0\) belongs to \({\cal D}\), the Abelian integral \(M\) has exactly one zero in \({\cal D}\), otherwise it has complex conjugate zeros on \((-\infty,0)\). This implies from one hand that \(\Delta\) is the segment of the line ([\[delta\]](#delta){reference-type="ref" reference="delta"}), connecting \(l_\infty\) and \(l_0\) as on fig.[\[bset\]](#bset){reference-type="ref" reference="bset"}. Thus also implies that in one of the connected components of \(\mathbb{R}\mathbb P^2\setminus \mathbb B\) the fundtion \(M\) has exactly one zero, as shown on fig.[\[bset\]](#bset){reference-type="ref" reference="bset"}. To determine the number od the zeros of \(M\) in the remaining connected components of the complement to the bifurcation set in \(\mathbb{R}\mathbb P^2\) we note that - when crossing \(\Delta\) or \(l_{-1/4}\) (in bold on the figure) two zeros are added or subtracted - when crossing \(l_0\) or \(l_{\infty}\) one simple zero is added or subtracted - the total number of zeros of \(M\) is not bigger than three The above considerations, combined with Lemma [\[z3\]](#z3){reference-type="ref" reference="z3"}, determine uniquely the number of the zeros of \(M\) in each connected component. This is summarized in the following The bound for the number of the zeros in the above Corollary in the complex domain \({\cal D}\) is three, which, according to Theorem [\[cyclicity\]](#cyclicity){reference-type="ref" reference="cyclicity"}, is not optimal on the real interval \((0,\infty)\). It seems impossible to deduce Theorem [\[cyclicity\]](#cyclicity){reference-type="ref" reference="cyclicity"} from Theorem [\[main\]](#main){reference-type="ref" reference="main"} by making use of complex methods only.

{'timestamp': '2014-01-22T02:11:43', 'yymm': '1401', 'arxiv_id': '1401.5419', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5419'}

# Introduction Let \(M\) be a complete Riemannian manifold. For a point \(p\in M\), let \(T_pM\) be the tangent space at \(p\) and \(\exp_p:T_pM\to M\) be the exponential map. For any unit vector \(v\in T_pM\), let \(\sigma(v)\) be the supremum of \(l\) such that the geodesic \(\exp tv:[0,l]\to M\) is minimizing, \(\kappa(v)\) be the supremum of \(s\) such that there is no conjugate point of \(p\) along \(\exp_p tv:[0,s)\to M\). Let \[\tilde C_p=\{\sigma(v)v: \text{ for all unit vector \(v\in T_pM\)}\}\] be the *tangential cut locus* of \(p\), \[\tilde J_p=\{\kappa(v)v: \text{ for all unit vector \(v\in T_pM\)}\}\] be the *tangential conjugate locus*, and \(C_p=\exp \tilde C_p\subset M\) be the *cut locus* of \(p\). Let \[\tilde D_p=\{tv\,|\, 0\le t<\sigma(v), \text{ for all unit vector }v\in T_pM\}\] be the maximal open domain of the origin in \(T_pM\) such that the restriction \(\exp_p|_{\tilde D_p}\) of \(\exp_p\) on \(\tilde D_p\) is injective. Any geodesic throughout the paper is assumed to be parametrized by arclength. A geodesic \(\gamma:[0,l]\to M\) is called a *geodesic loop at \(p\)* if \(\gamma(0)=\gamma(l)=p\). Let \(d(\cdot,\cdot)\) be the Riemannian distance function on \(M\). In Klingenberg proved a lemma that is well-known now in Riemannian geometry and particularly useful in injectivity radius estimate. Recently this lemma was generalized to the case of two points (). Let \(p,q\) be two points in a complete Riemannian manifold \(M\) such that \(C_p\neq \emptyset\) and \(q\not\in C_p\). Let \(F_{p;q}:C_p\to \Bbb R\) be a function defined on \(C_p\) by \(F_{p;q}(x)=d(p,x)+d(x,q)\). Innami, Shiohama and Soga proved in that Note that if \(p=q\), then Lemma [\[lem:OldGeneralization\]](#lem:OldGeneralization){reference-type="ref" reference="lem:OldGeneralization"} is reduced to the case of Klingenberg's Lemma. In this paper, we improve both results in the above to the following theorems whose constraints are sharp in general. Motivated by Theorem B, we will call a cut point \(q\) of \(p\) an *essential conjugate* point of \(p\) if \(p\) is conjugate to \(q\) along every minimal geodesic connecting them. Geodesic loops may not exist if there are essential conjugate points. For example, a complete noncompact Riemannian manifold of positive sectional curvature always contains a *simple* point \(p\) (i.e. there is no geodesic loop at \(p\)) whose cut locus is nonempty. By Theorem B, every local minimum point of \(d(p,\cdot)\) in \(C_p\) must be essentially conjugate to \(p\). The conjugate radius had been involved in the injectivity radius estimate besides the length of geodesic loops (see or ). Recall that the *conjugate radius* at \(p\) is defined by \[\operatorname{conj} (p)=\min\{\kappa(v)\,|\, \text{ for all unit vector \(v\in T_pM\)}\}\] and the *conjugate radius* of \(M\), \(\operatorname{conj}(M)=\inf_{p\in M}\operatorname{conj}(p).\) The *injectivity radius* of \(p\) is defined by \[\operatorname{injrad}(p)=\min\{\sigma(v)\,|\, \text{ for all unit vector \(v\in T_pM\)}\}\] and *injectivity radius* of \(M\), \(\operatorname{injrad}(M)=\inf_{p\in M}\operatorname{injrad}(p)\). It follows from Theorem B that the conjugate radius in the injectivity radius estimate can be replaced by the distance from \(p\) to its essential conjugate points. Let \(J^\varepsilon_p=C_p\setminus\exp_p(\tilde C_p\setminus \tilde J_p))\) be the the set consisting of all essential conjugate points of \(p\). Let \[\operatorname{conj}^\varepsilon(p)=\begin{cases} d(p,J^\varepsilon_p) & \text{if } J^\varepsilon_p\neq\emptyset,\\ +\infty &\text{otherwise}. \end{cases}\] and \(\operatorname{conj}^\varepsilon(M)=\min_{p\in M} \operatorname{conj}^\varepsilon(p)\). Then the injectivity radius can be expressed in the following way, where non-essential conjugate points are covered by geodesic loops. By Theorem [\[thm:injrad\]](#thm:injrad){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:injrad"}, in this paper we call \(\operatorname{conj}^\varepsilon(p)\) the *essential conjugate radius* of \(p\) and \(\operatorname{conj}^\varepsilon(M)\) the *essential conjugate radius* of \(M\). There have been rich results in Riemannian geometry where an upper sectional curvature bound \(K\) shows up to offer a lower bound \(\frac{\pi}{\sqrt{K}}\) of the conjugate radius, which now could be weakened to the essential conjugate radius. For instance, one is able to generalize Cheeger's finiteness theorem of diffeomorphism classes to Riemannian manifolds whose essential conjugate radius has a lower bound but sectional curvature has no upper bound. In general \(\operatorname{conj}^\varepsilon(p)\neq\operatorname{conj}(p)\). \(\mathbb{R}P^n\) with the canonical metric is a trivial example. An immediate question is, when \(\operatorname{conj}^\varepsilon(p)=\operatorname{conj}(p)\)? Next two applications of Theorem B offers examples where \(\operatorname{conj}^\varepsilon(p)\) coincides with \(\operatorname{conj}(p)\). By Theorem B, Theorem [\[thm:soul\]](#thm:soul){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:soul"} directly follows from the fact that the soul is totally convex (). For a closed Riemannian manifold \(M\), the *radius* of \(M\) is defined by \(\operatorname{rad}(M)=\min_{p\in M}\max\{d(p,x)\,|\, \text{ for any \)x\in M\(}\}.\) Xia proved () that if the manifold \(M\) in Theorem [\[thm:radiussphere\]](#thm:radiussphere){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:radiussphere"} satisfies \(\operatorname{conj}(M)\ge \operatorname{rad}(M)>\frac{\pi}{2}\), then \(M\) is isometric to a sphere of constant curvature. Theorem [\[thm:radiussphere\]](#thm:radiussphere){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:radiussphere"} follows his proof after replacing Klingenberg's lemma to Theorem B. In particular, if \(\operatorname{rad}(p)= \max_{x\in M}d(p,x)>\frac{\pi}{2}\), then \(\operatorname{injrad}(p)=\operatorname{conj}^\varepsilon(p)=\operatorname{conj}(p)\). Weaker versions of Theorem [\[thm:radiussphere\]](#thm:radiussphere){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:radiussphere"} can also be found in. Theorem A provides a new characterization on general Riemannian manifolds, which is an improvement of Theorem 1 in . We now explain the idea of our proof of Theorem A. Let \(p,q\in M\) such that \(C_p\neq\emptyset\), \(q\not\in C_p\) and \(x_0\in C_p\) is a minimum point of \(F_{p;q}\) in \(C_p\). Let us consider the special case that there is a unique minimal geodesic \([qx_0]\) connecting \(q\) and \(x_0\). A key observation from is that the level set of \(\{F_{p;q}\le C\}\) is star-shaped at both \(p\) and \(q\). In particular, if two minimal geodesics \([px_0]\) and \([x_0q]\) from \(p\) to \(x_0\) and from \(x_0\) to \(q\) are broken at \(x_0\), then for any point \(x\neq x_0\) in \([px_0]\) and any minimal geodesic \([qx]\) connecting \(q\) and \(x\), we have \([qx]\cap C_p=\emptyset\). Thus \([qx]\) admit a unique lifting \(\widetilde{[qx]}\) in \(\tilde D_p\). If two minimal geodesics, say \([px_0]_1\) and \([px_0]_2\), do not form a whole geodesic with \([x_0q]\) at the same time, then by moving \(x\) to \(x_0\) along \([px_0]_1\) and \([px_0]_2\) respectively, one may expect two liftings of \([qx_0]\) in \(\tilde D_p\) with different endpoints when partial limits of \(\widetilde{[qx]}\) exist. Under the condition that \(\tilde J_p\cap \tilde C_p=\emptyset\) as in Lemma [\[lem:OldGeneralization\]](#lem:OldGeneralization){reference-type="ref" reference="lem:OldGeneralization"} and , all such minimal geodesics \([px]\) are clearly definite away from the tangential conjugate locus. So we are able to take limit to meet a contradiction, for the lift \(\widetilde{[qx_0]}\) of \([qx_0]\) is unique in the closure of \(\tilde D_p\). In the general case one does not know whether \([qx_0]\) admits a lifting at its endpoint in the closure of \(\tilde D_p\), nor the liftings \(\widetilde{[qx]}\) have a partial limit as \(x\) approaches \(x_0\) along \([px_0]\). We will prove that, if there is a minimal geodesic \(\alpha\) from \(p\) to \(x_0\) along which they are not conjugate to each other, and the union of \(\alpha\) and \([qx_0]\) is broken at \(x_0\), then \([qx_0]\) always has a lifting in the closure of \(\tilde D_p\), which share a common endpoint with \(\tilde{\alpha}\) (see Lemma [\[lem:propertyoflift\]](#lem:propertyoflift){reference-type="ref" reference="lem:propertyoflift"}). The uniqueness of the minimal geodesic \([qx_0]\) is not an essential problem, because by ([\[lem:propertyoflift\]](#lem:propertyoflift){reference-type="ref" reference="lem:propertyoflift"}.4) and ([\[lem:propertyoflift\]](#lem:propertyoflift){reference-type="ref" reference="lem:propertyoflift"}.5) we are always able to move \(q\) along \([qx_0]\) while keeping \(F_{p;q}\) minimal at \(x_0\) in \(C_p\). A local minimum of \(F_{p;q}\) can be reduced to the minimum case similarly. The detailed proof of Theorem A will be given in the next section. # Proof of the generalized Klingenberg's lemma In this section we will prove Theorem A. Let \(M\) be a complete Riemannian manifold and \(p,q\) be two points in \(M\) such that \(C_p\neq\emptyset\) and \(q\not\in C_p\). Let us consider the function \[F_{p;q}:C_p\to \Bbb R, \quad F_{p;q}(x)=d(x,q)+d(x,p)\] and assume that \(F_{p;q}\) takes its minimum at \(x_0\in C_p\). Because \(q\) is not a cut point of \(p\), \(q\neq x_0\). Let \(\gamma:[0,d(q,x_0)]\to M\) be a minimal geodesic from \(q=\gamma(0)\) to \(x_0=\gamma(d(q,x_0))\). Because \(x_0\) is a cut point of \(p\), for any \(0\le t< d(q,x_0)\) we have \[\begin{aligned} F_q(\gamma(t))&=d(q,\gamma(t))+d(\gamma(t),p)\\ &< d(q,\gamma(t))+d(\gamma(t),x_0)+d(x_0,p)\tag{\(2.1\)}\\ &=d(q,x_0)+d(x_0,p)\\ &=F_q(x_0)\\ &=\min F_q. \end{aligned}\] Therefore \(\gamma(t)\) \((0\le t< d(q,x_0))\) is not a cut point of \(p\), and we are able to lift \(\left.\gamma\right|_{[0,d(q,x_0))}\) to \((\exp_p|_{\tilde{D}_p})^{-1}\circ\gamma\) uniquely in the *tangential segment domain* \(\tilde D_p\subset T_pM\), where \(\tilde D_p\) is the maximal open domain of the origin in \(T_pM\) such that the restriction \(\exp_p|_{\tilde D_p}\) of \(\exp_p\) on \(\tilde D_p\) is injective. We now prove that, if \(x_0\in \exp_p(\tilde{C}(p)\setminus \tilde{J}(p))\), then either \(\gamma\) can be lifted on the whole interval \([0,d(q,x_0)]\) such that the endpoint of the lift is a regular point of \(\exp_p\), or \(\gamma\) can be extended to a geodesic from \(q\) to \(p\) that goes through \(x_0\). A local minimum point of \(F_{p;q}\) can be reduced to the case of global minimum by the following lemma. We now are ready to prove Theorem A. Theorem B and Theorem [\[thm:newcharacter\]](#thm:newcharacter){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:newcharacter"} are immediate corollaries of Theorem A. We give a proof of Theorem [\[thm:finiteness\]](#thm:finiteness){reference-type="ref" reference="thm:finiteness"} to end the paper.

{'timestamp': '2014-01-24T02:02:41', 'yymm': '1401', 'arxiv_id': '1401.5549', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5549'}

# Introduction. The main objects of our present investigation are some truncated matrix power moment problems. At first, we study *the truncated matrix Hamburger moment problem with an odd number of moments*: find a left-continuous non-decreasing matrix function \(M(x) = ( m_{k,l}(x) )_{k,l=0}^{N-1}\) on \(\mathbb{R}\), \(M(-\infty)=0\), such that \[\label{f1_5} \int_\mathbb{R} x^n dM(x) = S_n,\qquad n=0,1,\ldots,2d,\] where \(\{ S_n \}_{n=0}^{2d}\) is a prescribed sequence of Hermitian \((N\times N)\) complex matrices (moments), \(d\in \mathbb{Z}_+\), \(N\in \mathbb{N}\). Secondly, we study the moment problem ([\[f1_5\]](#f1_5){reference-type="ref" reference="f1_5"}) with an additional constraint posed on the matrix measure \(M(\delta)\) (generated by the distribution function \(M(x)\)): \[\label{f1_10} M(\Delta) = 0,\] where \(\Delta\) is a given open subset of \(\mathbb{R}\) (a gap). Observe that the moment problem with a gap ([\[f1_5\]](#f1_5){reference-type="ref" reference="f1_5"}),([\[f1_10\]](#f1_10){reference-type="ref" reference="f1_10"}) in various particular cases coincides with the well-known moment problems. For instance, the case \(\Delta=(-\infty,0)\) leads to the truncated matrix Stieltjes moment problem; the case \(\Delta=(-\infty,a)\cup (b,+\infty)\), \(-\infty < a < b < +\infty\), leads to the truncated matrix Hausdorff moment problem, etc. Moment problems form a particular and very important case of interpolation problems for various classes of analytic functions. For the theory of classical scalar moment problems see, e.g., books ,. Matrix moment problems appeared as a natural generalizations of classical problems. The history for the truncated matrix Hamburger moment problem ([\[f1_5\]](#f1_5){reference-type="ref" reference="f1_5"}) was presented in our paper . That paper will be intensively used in the present paper. The results of paper  on the truncated matrix Hamburger moment problem will be our starting point here. Regarding the history for the truncated matrix Stieltjes and Hausdorff moment problems we refer to papers ,, , and papers cited there. For scalar truncated power moment problems with intervals as gaps see  and references therein. The moment problem ([\[f1_5\]](#f1_5){reference-type="ref" reference="f1_5"}) (the moment problem ([\[f1_5\]](#f1_5){reference-type="ref" reference="f1_5"}),([\[f1_10\]](#f1_10){reference-type="ref" reference="f1_10"})) is said to be **determinate** if it has a unique solution, and **indeterminate** if it has more than one solution. In Section 2 we obtain some necessary and sufficient conditions for the determinacy of the truncated matrix Hamburger moment problem ([\[f1_5\]](#f1_5){reference-type="ref" reference="f1_5"}). Then we derive a Nevanlinna-type parametrization for all solutions of the moment problem ([\[f1_5\]](#f1_5){reference-type="ref" reference="f1_5"}). The main tools are properties of the corresponding generalized resolvents. In the case of a determinate moment problem ([\[f1_5\]](#f1_5){reference-type="ref" reference="f1_5"}) the unique solution is constructed explicitly, as well. In Section 3 we give a criterion for the solvability of the truncated matrix power moment problem with a gap ([\[f1_5\]](#f1_5){reference-type="ref" reference="f1_5"}),([\[f1_10\]](#f1_10){reference-type="ref" reference="f1_10"}). A Nevanlinna-type formula for all solutions of the moment problem is obtained, as well. We emphasize that the coefficients of linear fractional transformations in all of the presented Nevanlinna-type formulas can be calculated by the prescribed moments explicitly. **Notations.** As usual, we denote by \(\mathbb{R}, \mathbb{C}, \mathbb{N}, \mathbb{Z}, \mathbb{Z}_+\) the sets of real numbers, complex numbers, natural numbers, integers and non-negative integers, respectively; \(\mathbb{R}_e = \mathbb{C}\backslash \mathbb{R}\); \(\mathbb{C}_\pm = \{ z\in \mathbb{C}:\ \pm\mathop{\rm Im}\nolimits z > 0\}\); \(\mathbb{T} = \{ z\in \mathbb{C}:\ |z|=1 \}\). By \(\Pi_z\) we mean the set, either \(\mathbb{C}_+\) or \(\mathbb{C}_-\), which contains \(z\); \(z\in \mathbb{R}_e\). We set \(\Pi_{\lambda}^\varepsilon = \{ z\in\Pi_{\lambda}:\ \varepsilon < |\arg z| < \pi-\varepsilon \},\qquad 0 < \varepsilon < \frac{\pi}{2}\), \(\lambda\in \mathbb{R}_e\). By \(\mathfrak{B}(\mathbb{R})\) we mean a set of all Borel subsets of \(\mathbb{R}\). Let \(N,K\in \mathbb{N}\). The set of all complex matrices of order \((N\times K)\) we denote by \(\mathbb{C}_{N\times K}\). The set of Hermitian non-negative complex matrices of order \((N\times N)\) will be denoted by \(\mathbb{C}_{N\times N}^{\geq}\). If \(M\in \mathbb{C}_{N\times K}\) then \(M^*\) means the complex conjugate matrix. If \(L\in \mathbb{C}_{N\times N}\) then \(\mathop{\rm Ker}\nolimits L = \{ x\in \mathbb{C}_{N\times 1}:\ Lx=0 \}\). By \(I_N\) we denote the identity matrix of size \((N\times N)\). By \(\mathbb{C}^N\) (\(\mathbb{C}_N\)) we denote the complex Euclidean space of vectors from \(\mathbb{C}_{1\times N}\) (respectively from \(\mathbb{C}_{N\times 1}\)). We denote \(\vec e_n = (\delta_{n,0},\delta_{n,1},\ldots,\delta_{n,N-1})\in \mathbb{C}_{1\times N}\), \(0\leq n\leq N-1\). Let \(M(x)\) be a left-continuous non-decreasing matrix function \(M(x) = ( m_{k,l}(x) )_{k,l=0}^{N-1}\) on \(\mathbb{R}\), \(M(-\infty)=0\), and \(\tau_M (x) := \sum_{k=0}^{N-1} m_{k,k} (x)\); \(M'_\tau (x) = ( dm_{k,l}/ d\tau_M )_{k,l=0}^{N-1}\). We denote by \(L^2(M)\) a set (of classes of equivalence) of vector functions \(f: \mathbb{R}\rightarrow \mathbb{C}_{1\times N}\), \(f = (f_0,f_1,\ldots,f_{N-1})\), such that \[\| f \|^2_{ L^2(M) } := \int_\mathbb{R} f(x) M'_\tau (x) f^*(x) d\tau_M (x) < \infty.\] The space \(L^2(M)\) is a Hilbert space with the scalar product \[( f,g )_{L^2(M)} := \int_\mathbb{R} f(x) M'_\tau (x) g^*(x) d\tau_M (x),\qquad f,g\in L^2(M).\] For a separable Hilbert space \(H\) we denote by \((\cdot,\cdot)_H\) and \(\| \cdot \|_H\) the scalar product and the norm in \(H\), respectively. In obvious cases, the indices may be omitted. For a linear operator \(\mathcal{A}\) in \(H\) we denote by \(D(\mathcal{A})\) its domain, by \(R(\mathcal{A})\) its range, and by \(\mathcal{A}^*\) we denote its adjoint if it exists. If \(\mathcal{A}\) is bounded, then \(\| \mathcal{A} \|\) stands for its operator norm. For a set \(S\) in \(H\), we denote by \(\mathop{\rm Lin}\nolimits S\) and \(\mathop{\rm span}\nolimits S\) the linear span and the closed linear span, in the norm of \(H\), of \(S\), respectively. For a set \(M\subseteq H\) we denote by \(\overline{M}\) the closure of \(M\) with respect to the norm of \(H\). By \(E_H\) we denote the identity operator in \(H\), i.e. \(E_H x = x\), \(x\in H\). If \(H_1\) is a subspace of \(H\), by \(P_{H_1} = P_{H_1}^{H}\) we denote the operator of the orthogonal projection on \(H_1\) in \(H\). By \(\mathcal{S}(D;N,N')\) we denote a class of all analytic in a domain \(D\subseteq \mathbb{C}\) operator-valued functions \(F(z)\), which values are linear non-expanding operators mapping the whole \(N\) into \(N'\), where \(N\) and \(N'\) are some Hilbert spaces. Consider a closed symmetric operator \(A\) in a Hilbert space \(H\). Denote \(\mathcal{M}_z = \mathcal{M}_z(A) = (A-zE_H) D(A)\), \(\mathcal{N}_z = \mathcal{N}_z(A) = H\ominus \mathcal{M}_z(A)\), where \(z\in \mathbb{C}\). Choose and fix an arbitrary point \(\lambda_0\in \mathbb{R}_e\). Set \(U_{\lambda_0}(A) = (A-\overline{\lambda_0}E_H)(A-\lambda_0 E_H)^{-1}\). Define a linear operator \(X_{\lambda_0}=X_{\lambda_0}(A)\) in the following way: \[\label{f1_5_p2_1} D(X_{\lambda_0}) = P^H_{\mathcal{N}_{\lambda_0}(A)} (H\ominus \overline{D(A)}),\] \[\label{f1_6_p2_1} X_{\lambda_0} P^H_{\mathcal{N}_{\lambda_0}(A)} h = P^H_{\mathcal{N}_{\overline {\lambda_0}}(A)} h,\qquad h\in H\ominus \overline{D(A)}.\] The operator \(X_{\lambda_0}=X_{\lambda_0}(A)\) is called *forbidden with respect to \(A\)*. A function \(F(\lambda)\in \mathcal{S}(\Pi_{\lambda_0}; \mathcal{N}_{\lambda_0}(A), \mathcal{N}_{ \overline{\lambda_0} }(A))\) is said to be *\(\lambda_0\)-admissible (admissible) with respect to the operator \(A\)*, if the validity of \[\label{f11_1_p2_1} \lim_{\lambda\in\Pi_{\lambda_0}^\varepsilon,\ \lambda\to\infty} F(\lambda) \psi = X_{\lambda_0}\psi,\] \[\label{f11_2_p2_1} \underline{\lim}_{\lambda\in\Pi_{\lambda_0}^\varepsilon,\ \lambda\to\infty} \left[ |\lambda| (\| \psi \|_H-\| F(\lambda) \psi \|_H) \right] < +\infty,\] for some \(\varepsilon\): \(0<\varepsilon <\frac{\pi}{2}\), implies \(\psi = 0\). A set of all operator-valued functions \(F(\lambda)\in \mathcal{S}(\Pi_{\lambda_0}; \mathcal{N}_{\lambda_0}(A), \mathcal{N}_{ \overline{\lambda_0} }(A))\), which are \(\lambda_0\)-admissible with respect to the operator \(A\), we shall denote by \[\mathcal{S}_{a; \lambda_0} (\Pi_{\lambda_0}; \mathcal{N}_{\lambda_0}(A), \mathcal{N}_{ \overline{\lambda_0} }(A)) = \mathcal{S}_{a} (\Pi_{\lambda_0}; \mathcal{N}_{\lambda_0}(A), \mathcal{N}_{ \overline{\lambda_0} }(A)).\] For a closed isometric operator \(V\) in a Hilbert space \(H\) we denote: \(M_\zeta(V) = (E_H-\zeta V) D(V)\), \(N_\zeta(V) = H\ominus M_\zeta(V)\), \(\zeta\in \mathbb{C}\); \(M_\infty(V)=R(V)\), \(N_\infty(V)= H\ominus R(V)\). # The truncated matrix Hamburger moment problem with an odd number of moments. Consider the moment problem ([\[f1_5\]](#f1_5){reference-type="ref" reference="f1_5"}) with a prescribed sequence \(\{ S_n \}_{n=0}^{2d}\) of Hermitian \((N\times N)\) complex matrices, \(d,N\in \mathbb{N}\). Set \[\label{f2_3} \Gamma_d = \left( S_{i+j} \right)_{i,j=0}^d,\qquad \widehat\Gamma_{d-1} = (S_{i+j+2})_{i,j=0}^{d-1}.\] The following conditions: \[\label{f2_7} \Gamma_{d}\geq 0,\quad \mathop{\rm Ker}\nolimits \Gamma_{d-1} \subseteq \mathop{\rm Ker}\nolimits \widehat\Gamma_{d-1},\] are necessary and sufficient for the solvability of the moment problem ([\[f1_5\]](#f1_5){reference-type="ref" reference="f1_5"}), see Remark on page 286 in . Suppose that conditions ([\[f2_7\]](#f2_7){reference-type="ref" reference="f2_7"}) are satisfied. Let \(\Gamma_d = (\gamma_{n,m}^d)_{n,m=0}^{dN +N-1}\), \(\gamma_{n,m}=\gamma_{n,m}^d\in \mathbb{C}\), be the usual representation of the block matrix \(\Gamma_d\). Repeating a construction from  we get a finite-dimensional Hilbert space \(H\) and a sequence \(\{ x_n \}_{n=0}^{dN +N-1}\) in \(H\), such that \[\label{f2_10} (x_n,x_m)_H = \gamma_{n,m},\qquad n,m=0,1...,dN +N-1,\] and \(\mathop{\rm span}\nolimits \{ x_n \}_{n=0}^{dN +N-1} = H\). Set \(L_a = \mathop{\rm Lin}\nolimits \{ x_n \}_{n=0}^{dN-1}\), and consider the following linear operator \(A\) with the domain \(D(A)=L_a\): \[\label{f2_15} A x = \sum_{k=0}^{dN-1} \alpha_k x_{k+N},\qquad x\in L_a,\ x = \sum_{k=0}^{dN-1} \alpha_k x_{k},\ \alpha_k\in \mathbb{C}.\] In particular, we have \[\label{f2_20} A x_k = x_{k+N},\qquad 0\leq k\leq dN-1.\] In  it is checked that the operator \(A\) is well-defined and symmetric. Since it acts in a finite-dimensional space, it is closed and its defect numbers are equal. By Theorem 5 in  all solutions of the moment problem ([\[f1_5\]](#f1_5){reference-type="ref" reference="f1_5"}) have the following form: \[\label{f2_25} M(\lambda) = (m_{k,j} (\lambda))_{k,j=0}^{N-1},\quad m_{k,j} (\lambda) = ( \mathbf E_\lambda x_k, x_j)_H,\] where \(\mathbf E_\lambda\) is a left-continuous spectral function of the operator \(A\). Moreover, the correspondence between all left-continuous spectral functions of \(A\) and all solutions of the moment problem is one-to-one. Since there exists a one-to-one correspondence between all generalized resolvents of \(A\) and all left-continuous spectral functions: \[(\mathbf R_z f,g)_H = \int_\mathbb{R} \frac{1}{\lambda-z} d( \mathbf E_\lambda f,g)_H,\qquad f,g\in H,\ z\in \mathbb{R}_e,\] we conclude that all solutions of the moment problem ([\[f1_5\]](#f1_5){reference-type="ref" reference="f1_5"}) have the following form: \[\label{f2_30} M(\lambda) = (m_{k,j} (\lambda))_{k,j=0}^{N-1},\quad \int_\mathbb{R} \frac{1}{\lambda-z} dm_{k,j} (\lambda) = ( \mathbf R_z x_k, x_j)_H,\quad z\in \mathbb{R}_e,\] where \(\mathbf R_z\) is a generalized resolvent of \(A\). On the other hand, for an arbitrary generalized resolvent there corresponds by ([\[f2_30\]](#f2_30){reference-type="ref" reference="f2_30"}) a solution \(M(\lambda)\) of the moment problem (via the Stieltjes-Perron inversion formula). Moreover, for different generalized resolvents there correspond by ([\[f2_30\]](#f2_30){reference-type="ref" reference="f2_30"}) different solutions of the moment problem Let us apply the Gram-Schmidt orthogonalization procedure to the following sequence: \[x_0, x_1,..., x_{dN-1}, x_{dN},..., x_{dN+N-1},\] removing the linear dependent elements if they appear. During the orthogonalization of the first \(dN\) elements (\(\{ x_k \}_{k=0}^{dN-1}\)) we shall obtain \(\kappa\) orthonormal elements \(\mathfrak{A}_\infty := \{ f_j \}_{j=0}^{\kappa-1}\), \(0\leq\kappa\leq dN\). The case \(\kappa = 0\) means that \(x_k=0\), \(0\leq k\leq dN-1\), and \(\mathfrak{A}_\infty = \emptyset\). By ([\[f2_10\]](#f2_10){reference-type="ref" reference="f2_10"}) we see that in this case holds \(S_0 = 0\), and therefore \(M(x)\equiv 0\) and the moment problem is determinate. In this case all given moments \(S_n\) are zero matrices. Then by ([\[f2_10\]](#f2_10){reference-type="ref" reference="f2_10"}) it follows that all \(x_k\) are zero elements and \(H = \{ 0 \}\). Applying the orthogonalization to the rest of the elements (\(\{ x_k \}_{k=dN}^{dN+N-1}\)) we shall obtain \(\kappa'\) orthonormal elements \(\mathfrak{A}_\infty' := \{ f_j' \}_{j=0}^{\kappa'-1}\), \(0\leq\kappa'\leq N\). In the case \(\kappa'=0\) we mean \(\mathfrak{A}_\infty' = \emptyset\). Notice that \(\mathfrak{A}_\infty\) (\(\mathfrak{A}_\infty'\)) is an orthonormal basis in \(D(A)\) (respectively, in \(H\ominus D(A)\)), if it is non-empty. Observe that the elements of \(\mathfrak{A}_\infty\) and \(\mathfrak{A}_\infty'\) are **linear combinations of \(x_j\) with some coefficients, which can be explicitly calculated by ([\[f2_10\]](#f2_10){reference-type="ref" reference="f2_10"})**. Similar features will be true for all orthogonalization procedures in this paper. **Proof.** (A)\(\Rightarrow\)(B). Suppose to the contrary that the moment problem ([\[f1_5\]](#f1_5){reference-type="ref" reference="f1_5"}) is determinate and the operator \(A\) has non-zero defect numbers. We can choose non-zero elements \(u_1\in N_i(A)\) and \(u_2\in N_{-i}(A)\), \(\| u_1 \|_H = \| u_2 \|_H = 1\), and set \[F_1(\lambda) = 0,\quad F_2(\lambda) = \frac{1}{2} (\cdot,u_1)_H u_2,\qquad \lambda\in \mathbb{C}_+.\] The operator-valued functions \(F_1(\lambda)\) and \(F_2(\lambda)\) generate by Theorem 7 in  different solutions of the moment problem ([\[f1_5\]](#f1_5){reference-type="ref" reference="f1_5"}). We obtained a contradiction. (B)\(\Rightarrow\)(A). The self-adjoint operator \(A\) has a unique (left-continuous) spectral function, therefore by ([\[f2_25\]](#f2_25){reference-type="ref" reference="f2_25"}) we conclude that the moment problem is determinate. (B)\(\Rightarrow\)(C). Since \(A\) is self-adjoint and it acts in a finite-dimensional space, then \(D(A)=H\). Then \(\mathfrak{A}_\infty' = \emptyset\). (C)\(\Rightarrow\)(B). If \(\mathfrak{A}_\infty' = \emptyset\), then \(D(A)=H\). Therefore \(A\) is self-adjoint. \(\Box\) Consider the **indeterminate** moment problem ([\[f1_5\]](#f1_5){reference-type="ref" reference="f1_5"}) with a prescribed sequence \(\{ S_n \}_{n=0}^{2d}\) of Hermitian \((N\times N)\) complex matrices, \(d,N\in \mathbb{N}\). Our aim is to derive a Nevanlinna-type parameterization for this moment problem. A general idea of this derivation is similar to the idea used in our paper  for the full matrix Hamburger moment problem. We shall need some auxiliary results for the generalized resolvents, as well. Set \[y_k := (A-iE_H) x_k = x_{k+N}-ix_k,\qquad k=0,1...,dN-1;\] \[H^-:= (A-iE_H) D(A) = \mathop{\rm Lin}\nolimits \{ y_k \}_{k=0}^{dN-1},\quad H^+ := (A+iE_H) D(A).\] Let us apply the Gram-Schmidt orthogonalization procedure to the following sequence: \[\label{f2_32} y_0, y_1,..., y_{dN-1}, x_{0}, x_1,..., x_{N-1},\] removing the linear dependent elements if they appear. Observe that the linear span of the above elements coincide with \(H\), as it follows from the formula (81) in . During the orthogonalization of the first \(dN\) elements (\(\{ y_k \}_{k=0}^{dN-1}\)) we shall obtain \(\tau\) orthonormal elements \(\mathfrak{A} := \{ u_j \}_{j=0}^{\tau-1}\), \(1\leq\tau\leq dN\). In fact, if we would have \(y_k=0\), \(0\leq k\leq dN-1\), then \(H^-= \{ 0 \}\) and \(D(A)=\{ 0 \}\). Then \(x_0 = x_1 =... =x_{N-1} = 0\), and by ([\[f2_10\]](#f2_10){reference-type="ref" reference="f2_10"}) we get \(S_0 = 0\). Then \(M(x)\equiv 0\), and the moment problem is determinate, what contradicts to our assumptions. Thus, at least one orthonormal element will be constructed during the orthogonalization. Applying the orthogonalization to the rest of the elements (\(\{ x_k \}_{k=0}^{N-1}\)) we shall obtain \(\delta\) orthonormal elements \(\mathfrak{A}' := \{ u_j' \}_{j=0}^{\delta-1}\), \(1\leq\delta\leq N\). If we would not obtain new elements during this orthogonalization, then \(H^-= H\), and the operator \(A\) would be self-adjoint. By Theorem [\[t2_1\]](#t2_1){reference-type="ref" reference="t2_1"} we would obtain that the moment problem is determinate and we would obtain a contradiction. Observe that \(\mathfrak{A}\) (\(\mathfrak{A}'\)) is an orthonormal basis in \(H^-\) (respectively, in \(H\ominus H^-\)). Consider the Cayley transformation of \(A\): \[V := (A+iE_H)(A-iE_H)^{-1}.\] Set \[v_k = V u_k,\qquad k=0,1...,\tau-1.\] Notice that \(\mathfrak{A}_v := \{ v_k \}_{k=0}^{\tau-1}\) is an orthonormal basis in \(H^+\). Let us apply the Gram-Schmidt orthogonalization procedure to the following sequence: \[v_0, v_1,..., v_{\tau-1}, x_{0}, x_1,..., x_{N-1},\] removing the linear dependent elements if they appear. Notice that the linear span of the above elements coincide with \(H\), as it follows from the formula (81) in . Observe that the first \(\tau\) elements are already orthonormal. Applying the orthogonalization to the rest of the elements (\(\{ x_k \}_{k=0}^{N-1}\)) we shall obtain \(\delta\) orthonormal elements \(\mathfrak{A}_v' := \{ v_k' \}_{k=0}^{\delta-1}\). Notice that \(\mathfrak{A}_v'\) is an orthonormal basis in \(H\ominus H^+\). We shall need the following description of the generalized resolvents of a symmetric operator. Also, we think that this description has some interest in general, since it uses bounded operators and allows to calculate the matrix of the generalized resolvent in an orthonormal basis. **Proof.** By Theorem 2.9 in  the following relation: \[\label{f2_46} \mathbf{R}_{u;\frac{\lambda-z}{\lambda-\overline{z}}} (U_z) = \frac{\lambda-\overline{z}}{z-\overline{z}} E_H + \frac{(\lambda-\overline{z})(\lambda-z)}{z-\overline{z}} \mathbf{R}_{s;\lambda} (A),\qquad \lambda\in \mathbb{R}_e\backslash\{ z,\overline{z} \},\] establishes a one-to-one correspondence between all generalized resolvents \(\mathbf{R}_{s;\lambda}(A)\) of the operator \(A\) and those generalized resolvents \(\mathbf{R}_{u;\zeta} (U_z)\) of the closed isometric operator \(U_z\) which are generated by extensions of \(U_z\) without non-zero fixed points. Let restrict relation ([\[f2_46\]](#f2_46){reference-type="ref" reference="f2_46"}) to \(\lambda\in \Pi_z\backslash\{ z \}\), and express the generalized resolvent \(\mathbf{R}_{s;\lambda} (A)\): \[\label{f2_48} \mathbf{R}_{s;\lambda} (A) = \frac{ z-\overline{z} }{ (\lambda-\overline{z}) (\lambda-z) } \left( \mathbf{R}_{u;\frac{\lambda-z}{\lambda-\overline{z}}} (U_z)- \frac{\lambda-\overline{z}}{z-\overline{z}} E_H \right),\quad \lambda\in\Pi_z\backslash\{ z \}.\] Let \(F(\lambda)\in \mathcal{S}_{a;z}(\Pi_z; \mathcal{N}_z(A), \mathcal{N}_{\overline{z}}(A))\) be the parameter in the Shtraus formula for the generalized resolvents (see, e.g. ) corresponding to \(\mathbf{R}_{s;\lambda} (A)\). Let \(\Phi_\zeta\) be the parameter in Chumakin's formula for the generalized resolvents (see, e.g. ), corresponding to \(\mathbf{R}_{u;\zeta} (U_z)\). These parameters are related by the following formula (see considerations after the proof of Proposition 4.20 and the formula (4.87) in ): \[\label{f2_52} F(\lambda) = \Phi_{\frac{ \lambda-z }{ \lambda-\overline{z} }},\quad \lambda\in\Pi_z.\] By the substitution of the expression for \(\mathbf{R}_{u;\cdot} (U_z)\) from Chumakin's formula into relation ([\[f2_48\]](#f2_48){reference-type="ref" reference="f2_48"}) and using ([\[f2_52\]](#f2_52){reference-type="ref" reference="f2_52"}) we obtain relation ([\[f2_40\]](#f2_40){reference-type="ref" reference="f2_40"}). \(\Box\) Let us return to the investigation of the moment problem. The following relation holds: \[(\mathbf{R}_z(A) x_k,x_j)_H = \frac{1}{z^2 + 1} \left( (\mathbf{R}_z(A) y_k,y_j)_H-\gamma_{k+N,j}-z \gamma_{k,j} \right),\] \[\label{f2_57} z\in \mathbb{C}_+\backslash\{ i \},\ 0\leq k,j \leq N-1.\] This can be proved by the same arguments as a similar property (28) in . Using ([\[f2_30\]](#f2_30){reference-type="ref" reference="f2_30"}), ([\[f2_57\]](#f2_57){reference-type="ref" reference="f2_57"}), and relation ([\[f2_40\]](#f2_40){reference-type="ref" reference="f2_40"}) with \(z=i\), we obtain that all solutions of the moment problem ([\[f1_5\]](#f1_5){reference-type="ref" reference="f1_5"}) have the following form: \[M(\lambda) = (m_{k,j} (\lambda))_{k,j=0}^{N-1},\] \[\int_\mathbb{R} \frac{1}{\lambda-z} dm_{k,j} (\lambda) = \frac{2i}{ (z^2+1)^2 } \left\{ \left( \left[ E_H-\frac{z-i}{z+i} \left( U_i(A) \oplus F(z) \right) \right]^{-1} y_k, y_j \right)_H \right.\] \[\label{f2_60} \left. + \psi_{j,k} (z)\right\},\quad z\in \mathbb{C}_+\backslash\{ i \},\] where \(F(z)\) is a function from \(\mathcal{S}_{a;i}(\mathbb{C}_+; \mathcal{N}_i(A), \mathcal{N}_{-i}(A))\), and \[\psi_{j,k} (z) :=-\frac{(z+i)}{2i} \left( \gamma_{k+N,j+N} + (z-i)\gamma_{k+N,j} + (z^2-iz + 1) \gamma_{k,j} \right),\] \[\label{f2_62} 0\leq k,j\leq N-1,\ z\in \mathbb{C}.\] Conversely, an arbitrary function \(F(z)\in \mathcal{S}_{a;i}(\mathbb{C}_+; \mathcal{N}_{i}(A), \mathcal{N}_{-i}(A))\) defines by relation ([\[f2_60\]](#f2_60){reference-type="ref" reference="f2_60"}) a solution \(M(x)\) of the moment problem ([\[f1_5\]](#f1_5){reference-type="ref" reference="f1_5"}). Moreover, for different functions from \(\mathcal{S}_{a;i}(\mathbb{C}_+; \mathcal{N}_{i}(A), \mathcal{N}_{-i}(A))\) there correspond different solutions of the moment problem ([\[f1_5\]](#f1_5){reference-type="ref" reference="f1_5"}). Consider the operator \(X_i=X_i(A)\) forbidden with respect to \(A\) (see the corresponding definition in Notations). Denote by \(\widetilde X_i\) the matrix of \(X_i\) with respect to the bases \(\mathfrak{A}'\), \(\mathfrak{A}_v'\). In order to construct \(\widetilde X_i\) by the given moments explicitly, we shall need the following proposition. **Proof.** Suppose to the contrary that there exists an element \(h\in H\ominus \overline{D(A)}\), \(h\not= 0\), such that \(S_{\infty;\lambda} h = P^H_{\mathcal{N}_{\lambda}(A)} h = 0\); \(\lambda\in \mathbb{R}_e\). Then \[h = P^H_{\mathcal{N}_{\lambda}(A)} h + P^H_{\mathcal{M}_{\lambda}(A)} h = P^H_{\mathcal{M}_{\lambda}(A)} h\in \mathcal{M}_{\lambda}(A),\] and therefore \(h\in (H\ominus \overline{D(A)})\cap \mathcal{M}_{\lambda}(A) = \{ 0 \}\), as it follows from Corollary 3.5 in . We obtained a contradiction, and therefore \(S_{\infty;\lambda}\) is invertible. By ([\[f1_5\_p2_1\]](#f1_5_p2_1){reference-type="ref" reference="f1_5_p2_1"}), ([\[f1_6\_p2_1\]](#f1_6_p2_1){reference-type="ref" reference="f1_6_p2_1"}) we get \[\label{f2_70} D(X_\lambda(A)) = S_{\infty;\lambda} (H\ominus \overline{D(A)}) = R(S_{\infty;\lambda});\] \[X_\lambda(A) S_{\infty;\lambda} h = S_{\infty;\overline{\lambda}} h,\qquad \lambda\in \mathbb{R}_e,\ h\in H\ominus \overline{D(A)}.\] Then \[X_\lambda(A) y = S_{\infty;\overline{\lambda}} S_{\infty;\lambda}^{-1} y,\qquad \lambda\in \mathbb{R}_e,\ y\in R(S_{\infty;\lambda}).\] Taking into account relation ([\[f2_70\]](#f2_70){reference-type="ref" reference="f2_70"}) we obtain ([\[f2_66\]](#f2_66){reference-type="ref" reference="f2_66"}). Consider the case of a finite-dimensional \(H\). Let \(g\) be an arbitrary element of \(\mathcal{N}_\lambda(A)\) such that \(g\perp R(S_{\infty;\lambda})\); \(\lambda\in \mathbb{R}_e\). Then \[0 = (g, P^H_{\mathcal{N}_\lambda(A)} h)_H = (g,h)_H,\qquad \forall h\in H\ominus D(A).\] Then \(g\in D(A)\). By Corollary 3.2 in  we get \(g=0\). Therefore \(\mathcal{N}_\lambda(A)\ominus R(S_{\infty;\lambda}) = \{ 0 \}\), and taking into account relation ([\[f2_70\]](#f2_70){reference-type="ref" reference="f2_70"}) we get ([\[f2_67\]](#f2_67){reference-type="ref" reference="f2_67"}). \(\Box\) Return to the investigation of the moment problem. Since we assumed that the moment problem is indeterminate, by Theorem [\[t2_1\]](#t2_1){reference-type="ref" reference="t2_1"} we get \(\mathfrak{A}_\infty'\not= \emptyset\). Denote by \(\mathcal{M}_{S_{\infty;i}}\) (\(\mathcal{M}_{S_{\infty;-i}}\)) the matrix of the operator \(S_{\infty;i}\) (\(S_{\infty;-i}\)) with respect to the bases \(\mathfrak{A}'\),\(\mathfrak{A}_\infty'\) (respectively with respect to the bases \(\mathfrak{A}_v'\),\(\mathfrak{A}_\infty'\)): \[\label{f2_75} \mathcal{M}_{S_{\infty;i}} = \left( ( S_{\infty;i} f_k', u_l')_H \right)_{0\leq l\leq \delta-1,\ 0\leq k\leq \kappa'-1} = \left( ( f_k', u_l')_H \right)_{0\leq l\leq \delta-1,\ 0\leq k\leq \kappa'-1},\] \[\label{f2_79} \mathcal{M}_{S_{\infty;-i}} = \left( ( S_{\infty;-i} f_k', v_l')_H \right)_{0\leq l\leq \delta-1,\ 0\leq k\leq \kappa'-1} = \left( ( f_k', v_l')_H \right)_{0\leq l\leq \delta-1,\ 0\leq k\leq \kappa'-1}.\] Then \[\label{f2_85} \widetilde X_i = \mathcal{M}_{S_{\infty;-i}} \mathcal{M}_{S_{\infty;i}}^{-1}.\] Consider a transformation \(\mathbf{T}\) which for an arbitrary function \(F(z)\in \mathcal{S}_{a;i}(\mathbb{C}_+; \mathcal{N}_{i}(A), \mathcal{N}_{-i}(A))\) put into correspondence the following \(\mathbb{C}_{\delta\times\delta}\)-valued function \(\mathbf{F}(z)\): \[\label{f2_90} \mathbf{F}(z) = \mathbf{T} F = \left( (F(z) u_j', v_k')_H \right)_{0\leq k,j\leq \delta-1},\qquad z\in \mathbb{C}_+.\] It is readily checked that the transformation \(\mathbf{T}\) is bijective, and it maps \(\mathcal{S}_{a;i}(\mathbb{C}_+; \mathcal{N}_{i}(A), \mathcal{N}_{-i}(A))\) on the whole \(\mathrm{S} (\mathbb{C}_+; \mathbb{C}_{\delta\times \delta}; \widetilde X_i)\). Denote by \(\mathcal{M}_{1;z}(F)\) the matrix of the operator \(E_H-\frac{z-i}{z+i} \left( U_i(A)\oplus F(z) \right)\) with respect to the basis \(\mathfrak{A}\cup \mathfrak{A}'\); \(z\in \mathbb{C}_+\), \(F\in \mathcal{S}_{a;i}(\mathbb{C}_+; \mathcal{N}_{i}(A), \mathcal{N}_{-i}(A))\). Then \[\mathcal{M}_{1;z}(F) = \left( \begin{array}{cc} A_{0;z} & B_{0;z}(F)\\ C_{0;z} & D_{0;z}(F)\end{array} \right),\] where \[A_{0;z} = \left( \left( \left( E_H-\frac{z-i}{z+i} \left( U_i(A)\oplus F(z) \right) \right) u_k, u_j \right)_H \right)_{j,k=0}^{\tau-1}\] \[\label{f2_95} = I_\tau-\left( \frac{z-i}{z+i} \right) \left( (v_k,u_j)_H \right)_{j,k=0}^{\tau-1};\] \[B_{0;z}(F) = \left( \left( \left( E_H-\frac{z-i}{z+i} \left( U_i(A)\oplus F(z) \right) \right) u_k', u_j \right)_H \right)_{0\leq j\leq\tau-1,\ 0\leq k\leq\delta-1}\] \[\label{f2_97} =-\left( \frac{z-i}{z+i} \right) \left( (F(z) u_k',u_j)_H \right)_{0\leq j\leq\tau-1,\ 0\leq k\leq\delta-1};\] \[C_{0;z} = \left( \left( \left( E_H-\frac{z-i}{z+i} \left( U_i(A)\oplus F(z) \right) \right) u_k, u_j' \right)_H \right)_{0\leq j\leq\delta-1,\ 0\leq k\leq\tau-1}\] \[\label{f2_99} =-\left( \frac{z-i}{z+i} \right) \left( (v_k,u_j')_H \right)_{0\leq j\leq\delta-1,\ 0\leq k\leq\tau-1};\] \[D_{0;z}(F) = \left( \left( \left( E_H-\frac{z-i}{z+i} \left( U_i(A)\oplus F(z) \right) \right) u_k', u_j' \right)_H \right)_{0\leq j,k\leq\delta-1}\] \[\label{f2_101} = I_\delta-\left( \frac{z-i}{z+i} \right) \left( (F(z) u_k',u_j')_H \right)_{0\leq j,k\leq\delta-1}.\] Set \(\mathbf{F}(z) = (\mathbf{F}_{j,k}(z))_{0\leq j,k\leq\delta-1} := \mathbf{T} F\). Observe that \[\label{f2_103} F(z) u_k' = \sum_{l=0}^{\delta-1} \mathbf{F}_{l,k}(z) v_l',\qquad 0\leq k\leq\delta-1.\] Using ([\[f2_103\]](#f2_103){reference-type="ref" reference="f2_103"}) we obtain that \[\label{f2_107} B_{0;z}(F) =-\left(\frac{z-i}{z+i}\right) W \mathbf{F}(z),\] where \[\label{f2_109} W := \left( (v_l',u_j)_H \right)_{0\leq j\leq\tau-1,\ 0\leq l\leq \delta-1};\] and \[\label{f2_111} D_{0;z}(F) = I_\delta-\left(\frac{z-i}{z+i}\right) T \mathbf{F}(z),\] where \[\label{f2_115} T := \left( (v_l',u_j')_H \right)_{0\leq j,l\leq \delta-1}.\] The matrix \(\mathcal{M}_{1;z}(F)\) is invertible, since it is the matrix of an invertible operator. The matrix \(A_{0;z}\) is invertible, since it is the matrix of an invertible operator \[\left. P^{H}_{ \mathcal{M}_i(A) } \left( E_H-\frac{z-i}{z+i} \left( U_i(A)\oplus F(z) \right) \right) \right|_{ \mathcal{M}_i(A) } = E_{ \mathcal{M}_i(A) }-\frac{z-i}{z+i} P^{H}_{ \mathcal{M}_i(A) } U_i(A).\] By the Frobenius formula for the inverse of a block matrix we get: \[\label{f2_117} \mathcal{M}_{1;z}^{-1}(F) = \left( \begin{array}{cc} A_{0;z}^{-1}-\left(\frac{z-i}{z+i}\right) A_{0;z}^{-1} W \mathbf{F}(z) H^{-1}(z) C_{0;z} A_{0;z}^{-1} & *\\ * & *\end{array} \right),\] where \[\label{f2_119} H(z) = I_\delta-\left(\frac{z-i}{z+i}\right) \left( T-C_{0;z} A_{0;z}^{-1} W \right) \mathbf{F} (z),\quad z\in \mathbb{C}_+,\] and by \((*)\) we denote those blocks which are not important for us. Let \(\{ u_j \}_{j=0}^{\rho-1}\) be those elements, which were obtained during the orthogonalization of the sequence ([\[f2_32\]](#f2_32){reference-type="ref" reference="f2_32"}), on the first \(N\) steps (i.e. during the orthogonalization of \(\{ y_k \}_{k=0}^{N-1}\)). Observe that \(\rho\geq 1\). In the opposite case, we would have: \(y_k = 0\), \(0\leq k\leq N-1\); and by ([\[f2_60\]](#f2_60){reference-type="ref" reference="f2_60"}) the moment problem would be determinate. That contradicts to our assumptions. Set \[H_\rho^-= \mathop{\rm Lin}\nolimits \{ y_k \}_{k=0}^{N-1} = \mathop{\rm Lin}\nolimits \{ u_j \}_{j=0}^{\rho-1}.\] Consider the following operator: \[J(F;z) = \left. P^H_{H_\rho^-} \left( E_H-\left(\frac{z-i}{z+i}\right) \left( U_i(A)\oplus F(z) \right) \right)^{-1} \right|_{H_\rho^-}:\ H_\rho^-\mapsto H_\rho^-,\qquad z\in \mathbb{C}_+,\] where \(F(z)\in \mathcal{S}_{a;i}(\mathbb{C}_+; \mathcal{N}_{i}(A), \mathcal{N}_{-i}(A))\). Set \[\label{f2_125} k_z = \det \left( (z+i) A_{0;z} \right) = (z+i)^\tau \det A_{0;z},\qquad z\in \mathbb{C}_+,\] \[\label{f2_130} \widetilde A_{0;z} = \frac{k_z}{z+i} A_{0;z}^{-1},\qquad z\in \mathbb{C}_+.\] Observe that \(k_z\) is a scalar polynomial of \(z\), while \(\widetilde A_{0;z}\) is a matrix polynomial of \(z\). The matrix standing on the intersection of the first \(\rho\) rows and the first \(\rho\) columns of \(\widetilde A_{0;z}\) we denote by \(A_{1;z}\). The matrix standing in the first \(\rho\) rows (in the first \(\rho\) columns) of \(\widetilde A_{0;z}\) we denote by \(A_{2;z}\) (respectively by \(A_{3;z}\)). It is readily checked that the matrix \(\mathcal{M}(J(F;z))\) of \(J(F;z)\), \(z\in \mathbb{C}_+\), with respect to the basis \(\{ u_j \}_{j=0}^{\rho-1}\) is equal to \[\mathcal{M}(J(F;z)) := \left( (J(F;z) u_k, u_j)_H \right)_{j,k=0}^{\rho-1} =\] \[\label{f2_135} \frac{z+i}{k_z} A_{1;z}- \frac{(z^2+1)}{k_z^2} A_{2;z} W \mathbf{F}(z) H^{-1}(z) C_{0;z} A_{3;z},\qquad z\in \mathbb{C}_+.\] Consider the following operator, acting from \(\mathbb{C}^N\) to \(H_\rho^-\): \[\mathcal{K} \sum_{n=0}^{N-1} \alpha_n \vec e_n = \sum_{n=0}^{N-1} \alpha_n y_n,\qquad \alpha_n\in \mathbb{C},\] where \(\vec e_n = (\delta_{n,0},\delta_{n,1},\ldots,\delta_{n,N-1})\in \mathbb{C}^N\). Let \(K\) be the matrix of \(\mathcal{K}\) with respect to the orthonormal bases \(\{ \vec e_n \}_{n=0}^{N-1}\) and \(\{ u_j \}_{j=0}^{\rho-1}\): \[\label{f2_140} K = \left( \left( \mathcal{K} \vec e_k, u_j \right)_H \right)_{0\leq j\leq \rho-1,\ 0\leq k\leq N-1} = \left( \left(y_k, u_j \right)_H \right)_{0\leq j\leq \rho-1,\ 0\leq k\leq N-1}.\] The right-hand side of ([\[f2_60\]](#f2_60){reference-type="ref" reference="f2_60"}) may be written as \[\frac{2i}{(z^2+1)^2} \left\{ \left( \mathcal{K}^* J(F;z) \mathcal{K} \vec e_k, \vec e_j \right)_{\mathbb{C}^N} + \psi_{j,k}(z) \right\}.\] Set \[\Psi(z) = \left( \psi_{j,k}(z) \right)_{0\leq j,k\leq N-1}.\] Rewriting ([\[f2_60\]](#f2_60){reference-type="ref" reference="f2_60"}) in the matrix form we get: \[\int_\mathbb{R} \frac{1}{\lambda-z} dM^T (\lambda) = \frac{2i}{ (z^2+1)^2 } \left\{ K^* \mathcal{M}(J(F;z)) K + \Psi(z) \right\},\] \[\label{f2_142} z\in \mathbb{C}_+\backslash\{ i \},\ F(z)\in \mathcal{S}_{a;i}(\mathbb{C}_+; \mathcal{N}_i(A), \mathcal{N}_{-i}(A)).\] Set \[\label{f2_145} \widehat C = \left( (v_k,u_j')_H \right)_{0\leq j\leq\delta-1,\ 0\leq k\leq\tau-1};\] \[\label{f2_150} \mathbf{A} (z) = (z+i) K^* A_{1;z} K + k_z \Psi(z),\] \[\label{f2_153} \mathbf{B} (z) =-(z^2+1) K^* A_{2;z} W,\] \[\label{f2_155} \mathbf{C} (z) = (-z+i) \left( k_z T + (z-i) \widehat C \widetilde A_{0;z} W \right),\] \[\label{f2_157} \mathbf{D} (z) = (z+i) C_{0;z} A_{3;z} K,\qquad z\in \mathbb{C}_+.\] Using these definitions and relation ([\[f2_135\]](#f2_135){reference-type="ref" reference="f2_135"}) we rewrite ([\[f2_142\]](#f2_142){reference-type="ref" reference="f2_142"}) in the following form: \[\int_\mathbb{R} \frac{1}{\lambda-z} dM^T (\lambda)\] \[= \frac{2i}{ (z^2+1)^2 k_z } \left\{ \mathbf{A}(z) + \mathbf{B}(z) \mathbf{F}(z) \left( (z+i) k_z I_\delta + \mathbf{C}(z) \mathbf{F}(z) \right)^{-1} \mathbf{D}(z) \right\},\] \[\label{f2_160} z\in \mathbb{C}_+\backslash\{ i \},\quad \mathbf{F}=\mathbf{T}F,\ F(z)\in \mathcal{S}_{a;i}(\mathbb{C}_+; \mathcal{N}_i(A), \mathcal{N}_{-i}(A)).\] **Proof.** The proof follows directly from the previous considerations. \(\Box\) **The determinate case.** Consider the moment problem ([\[f1_5\]](#f1_5){reference-type="ref" reference="f1_5"}) with a prescribed sequence \(\{ S_n \}_{n=0}^{2d}\) of Hermitian \((N\times N)\) complex matrices, \(d,N\in \mathbb{N}\). Suppose that this moment problem is **determinate**. By Theorem [\[t2_1\]](#t2_1){reference-type="ref" reference="t2_1"} this means that the corresponding operator \(A\) in the Hilbert space \(H\) is self-adjoint. If \(\mathfrak{A}_\infty = \emptyset\), as it was already mentioned, the unique solution of the moment problem is \(M(x)\equiv 0\). Suppose that \(\mathfrak{A}_\infty \not= \emptyset\). In this case, \(\mathfrak{A}_\infty\) is an orthonormal basis in \(H\). By ([\[f2_30\]](#f2_30){reference-type="ref" reference="f2_30"}) the unique solution can be found from the following relation: \[M(\lambda) = (m_{k,j} (\lambda))_{k,j=0}^{N-1},\quad \int_\mathbb{R} \frac{1}{\lambda-z} dm_{k,j} (\lambda) = ( (A-z E_H)^{-1} x_k, x_j)_H\] \[\label{f2_170} = ( \mathcal{R}^* (A-z E_H)^{-1} \mathcal{R} \vec e_k, \vec e_j)_{\mathbb{C}^N},\quad z\in \mathbb{R}_e,\] where the operator \(\mathcal{R}\) maps \(\mathbb{C}^N\) into \(H\): \[\mathcal{R} \sum_{n=0}^{N-1} \alpha_n \vec e_n = \sum_{n=0}^{N-1} \alpha_n x_n,\qquad \alpha_n\in \mathbb{C},\] and \(\vec e_n = (\delta_{n,0},\delta_{n,1},\ldots,\delta_{n,N-1})\in \mathbb{C}^N\). Let \(R\) be the matrix of \(\mathcal{R}\) with respect to the orthonormal bases \(\{ \vec e_n \}_{n=0}^{N-1}\) and \(\mathfrak{A}_\infty\): \[\label{f2_175} R = \left( \left( \mathcal{R} \vec e_k, f_j \right)_H \right)_{0\leq j\leq \kappa-1,\ 0\leq k\leq N-1} =\left( \left( x_k, f_j \right)_H \right)_{0\leq j\leq \kappa-1,\ 0\leq k\leq N-1}.\] Let \(\mathcal{M}_A\) be the matrix of \(A\) with respect to the basis \(\mathfrak{A}_\infty\): \[\label{f2_180} \mathcal{M}_A = \left( \left( A f_k, f_j \right)_H \right)_{0\leq j,k\leq \kappa-1}.\] Observe that the matrices \(R\) and \(\mathcal{M}_A\) can be calculated explicitly by the prescribed moments. Rewrite ([\[f2_170\]](#f2_170){reference-type="ref" reference="f2_170"}) in the matrix form: \[\label{f2_185} \int_\mathbb{R} \frac{1}{\lambda-z} dM^T (\lambda) = R^* (\mathcal{M}_A-z I_{\kappa})^{-1} R,\quad z\in \mathbb{R}_e.\] The unique solution \(M(\lambda)\) of the moment problem can be found from ([\[f2_185\]](#f2_185){reference-type="ref" reference="f2_185"}) by the Stieltjes-Perron inversion formula. Moreover, since the solution \(M(\lambda)\) has a finite number of points of increase, than expanding rational functions appearing as entries of the matrix on the right of ([\[f2_185\]](#f2_185){reference-type="ref" reference="f2_185"}) into simple fractions we can find \(M(\lambda)\). # The truncated matrix Hamburger moment problem with an odd number of moments and having a gap. Consider the moment problem ([\[f1_5\]](#f1_5){reference-type="ref" reference="f1_5"}),([\[f1_10\]](#f1_10){reference-type="ref" reference="f1_10"}) with a prescribed sequence \(\{ S_n \}_{n=0}^{2d}\) of Hermitian \((N\times N)\) complex matrices, \(d,N\in \mathbb{N}\), and a prescribed open set \(\Delta\). We shall assume that the corresponding moment problem ([\[f1_5\]](#f1_5){reference-type="ref" reference="f1_5"}) (i.e. the moment problem ([\[f1_5\]](#f1_5){reference-type="ref" reference="f1_5"}) with the same moments) is **indeterminate**. In fact, if the corresponding moment problem ([\[f1_5\]](#f1_5){reference-type="ref" reference="f1_5"}) has no solutions than the moment problem ([\[f1_5\]](#f1_5){reference-type="ref" reference="f1_5"}),([\[f1_10\]](#f1_10){reference-type="ref" reference="f1_10"}) has no solutions, as well. If the corresponding moment problem ([\[f1_5\]](#f1_5){reference-type="ref" reference="f1_5"}) has a unique solution than this solution can be found explicitly, as it was discussed at the end of the previous section. Then condition ([\[f1_10\]](#f1_10){reference-type="ref" reference="f1_10"}) may be verified directly. Each solution \(M(x)\) of the moment problem ([\[f1_5\]](#f1_5){reference-type="ref" reference="f1_5"}) generates a matrix measure on \(\mathfrak{B}(\mathbb{R})\) (i.e. a \(\mathbb{C}_{N\times N}^\geq\)-valued function on \(\mathfrak{B}(\mathbb{R})\), which is countably additive). For example, we may define this measure according to ([\[f2_25\]](#f2_25){reference-type="ref" reference="f2_25"}): \[\label{f3_5} M(\delta) = \left( (\mathbf{E}(\delta) x_k, x_j)_H \right)_{k,j=0}^{N-1},\qquad \delta\in \mathfrak{B}(\mathbb{R}),\] where \(\mathbf{E}(\delta)\) is the spectral measure corresponding to the spectral function \(\mathbf{E}_t\) related to the solution \(M(x)\). Any matrix measure \(\widetilde M(\delta) = (\widetilde m_{k,j}(\delta))_{k,j=0}^{N-1}\) on \(\mathfrak{B}(\mathbb{R})\) satisfying the following relation: \[\label{f3_7} \widetilde M((-\infty,x)) = M(x),\qquad x\in \mathbb{R},\] coincides with \(M(\delta)\). In fact, we may consider the following functions: \[f_{k,j}(\delta;\alpha;\widetilde M) = (\widetilde M(\delta) (\vec e_k + \alpha\vec e_j), \vec e_k + \alpha\vec e_j )_{\mathbb{C}^N} \geq 0,\] where \(\alpha\in \mathbb{C}\), \(\delta\in \mathfrak{B}(\mathbb{R})\). The scalar measures \(f_{k,j}(\delta;\alpha;\widetilde M)\) and \(f_{k,j}(\delta;\alpha; M)\) coincide, since coincide their distribution functions. On the other hand, the entries of \(M(\delta)\) and \(\widetilde M(\delta)\) are expressed via \(f_{k,j}\) by the polarization formula. Then \(\widetilde M(\delta) = M(\delta)\). The function on the left of ([\[f3_7\]](#f3_7){reference-type="ref" reference="f3_7"}) is said to be *the distribution function* of \(\widetilde M(\delta)\). **Proof.** (ii)\(\Rightarrow\)(i). It follows directly from relation ([\[f3_5\]](#f3_5){reference-type="ref" reference="f3_5"}). (i)\(\Rightarrow\)(ii). By the construction in , the solution \(M(x)=(m_{k,j}(\lambda))_{k,j=0}^{N-1}\) is generated by the left-continuous resolution of unity \(\{ \widehat E_\lambda \}_{\lambda\in \mathbb{R}}\) of a self-adjoint operator \(\widehat A\) in a Hilbert space \(\widehat H\supseteq H\): \[m_{k,j}(\lambda) = \left( P^{\widehat H}_H \widehat E_\lambda x_k, x_j \right)_H,\qquad 0\leq k,j\leq N-1,\] and \[\label{f3_9} \widehat A = UQU^{-1},\] where \(Q\) is an operator of the multiplication by an independent variable in \(L^2(M)\), and \(U\) is a unitary operator, mapping \(L^2(M)\) on \(\widehat H\). Denote by \(\widehat E(\delta)\) (\(\delta\in \mathfrak{B}(\mathbb{R})\)) the orthogonal spectral measure, corresponding to \(\widehat E_t\). Observe that according to the one-to-one correspondence ([\[f2_25\]](#f2_25){reference-type="ref" reference="f2_25"}) we have: \(\mathbf{E}_\lambda = P^{\widehat H}_H \widehat E_\lambda\), \(\lambda\in \mathbb{R}\), and therefore \[\label{f3_15} \mathbf{E}(\delta) = P^{\widehat H}_H \widehat E(\delta),\qquad \delta\in \mathfrak{B}(\mathbb{R}). \end{equation By~(\ref{f3_9}) we obtain that \begin{equation} \label{f3_20} \widehat E(\delta) = U E_0(\delta) U^{-1},\qquad \delta\in \mathfrak{B}(\mathbb{R}),\] where \(E_0(\delta)\) is the orthogonal spectral measure of \(Q\). Observe that \[\label{f3_22} E_0(\delta) f(t) = \chi_\delta(t) f(t),\qquad \delta\in \mathfrak{B}(\mathbb{R}),\ f\in L^2(M),\] where \(\chi_\delta(t)\) is the characteristic function of the set \(\delta\) (i.e. it is equal to \(1\) on \(\delta\), and equal to \(0\) on \(\mathbb{R} \backslash\delta\)). Since \(M(\Delta)=0\), then \(\tau_M (\Delta) = \sum_{k=0}^{N-1} m_{k,k} (\Delta) = 0\). Choose an arbitrary function \(f\in L^2(M)\). We may write: \[\| \chi_\Delta(t) f(t) \|_{L^2(M)}^2 = \int_{\mathbb{R}} \chi_\Delta(t) f(t) M'_\tau (t) d\tau_M (\chi_\Delta(t) f(t))^*\] \[= \int_{\Delta} f(t) M'_\tau (t) f^*(t) d\tau_M = 0.\] Therefore \(E_0(\Delta)=0\), and by ([\[f3_20\]](#f3_20){reference-type="ref" reference="f3_20"}),([\[f3_15\]](#f3_15){reference-type="ref" reference="f3_15"}) we get \(\mathbf{E}(\Delta) = 0\). \(\Box\) The following two results are simple generalizations of Proposition 4.17 and Theorem 4.21 in . The proofs of these results follows easily from the fact, that each open subset of \(\mathbb{R}\) is a union of at most countable set of open intervals, and from the above mentioned results in . As it follows from an analogous remark at the end of Section 4 in , conditions ([\[f3_25\]](#f3_25){reference-type="ref" reference="f3_25"}),([\[f3_27\]](#f3_27){reference-type="ref" reference="f3_27"}) are necessary for the existence of at least one generalized resolvent of \(A\), which admits an analytic continuation on \(\mathbb{R}_e\cup\Delta\). In view of further applications to the moment problem ([\[f1_5\]](#f1_5){reference-type="ref" reference="f1_5"}), we shall obtain another representation for the function \(\mathcal{W}_\lambda\) from the last theorem. Let \(A\),\(H\),\(\Delta\) satisfy the assumptions of Theorem [\[t3_1\]](#t3_1){reference-type="ref" reference="t3_1"} with \(z=i\). Consider the following operators: \[\label{f3_31} S_\lambda = P^H_{ \mathcal{N}_i(A) }|_{ \mathcal{N}_\lambda(A) },\quad Q_\lambda = P^H_{ \mathcal{N}_{-i}(A) }|_{ \mathcal{N}_\lambda(A) },\qquad \lambda\in\Delta.\] Set \(V=U_i(A)\). Observe that \[\mathcal{N}_i(A) = N_0(V),\ \mathcal{N}_{-i}(A) = N_\infty(V),\ \mathcal{N}_\lambda(A) = N_{ \frac{\lambda-i}{\lambda+i} }(V),\quad \lambda\in\Delta.\] Choose an arbitrary point \(\lambda\in\Delta\). Since \(\lambda\) is a point of the regular type of \(A\), by Proposition 4.18 in  with \(\lambda_0=i\) we obtain that \(\frac{\lambda+i}{\lambda-i}(\in \mathbb{T})\) is a point of the regular type of \(V\). Set \(\zeta = \frac{\lambda-i}{\lambda+i}\in \mathbb{T}\). Relation ([\[f3_30\]](#f3_30){reference-type="ref" reference="f3_30"}), with \(z=i\), may be written in the following form: \[\mathcal{W}_\lambda P^H_{ N_0(V) } f = \frac{1}{\zeta} P^H_{ N_\infty(V)} f,\qquad f\in N_\zeta(V).\] Comparing this relation with the definition of an operator \(W_\zeta\) in (4.60) in  we conclude that \(\mathcal{W}_\lambda = W_\zeta\). Moreover, the operators \(S\) and \(Q\), defined afterwards in , coincide with operators \(S_\lambda\) and \(Q_\lambda\) from ([\[f3_31\]](#f3_31){reference-type="ref" reference="f3_31"}), respectively. By (4.61) in  we obtain that \(D(\mathcal{W}_\lambda) = \mathcal{N}_i(A)\), \(R(\mathcal{W}_\lambda) = \mathcal{N}_{-i}(A)\) and \[\label{f3_34} \mathcal{W}_\lambda = \frac{\lambda+i}{\lambda-i} Q_\lambda S_\lambda^{-1},\qquad \lambda\in\Delta.\] Moreover, the operator \(S_\lambda^{-1}\) is bounded and defined on the whole \(\mathcal{N}_i(A)\). In the case of a finite-dimensional Hilbert space, the last theorem can be made more simple. We shall need the following lemma. **Proof.** Observe that \[M_\infty(U_z(A)) = \mathcal{M}_{\overline{z}} (A),\] \[M_{ \frac{\lambda-z}{\lambda-\overline{z}} }(U_z(A)) = \mathcal{M}_{\lambda} (A),\qquad \lambda\in\Delta.\] Denote \(V=U_z(A)\). Condition ([\[f3_27\]](#f3_27){reference-type="ref" reference="f3_27"}) can be written in the following form: \[\label{f3_35} P^H_{M_\infty(V)} M_{ \frac{\lambda-z}{\lambda-\overline{z}} } (V) = M_\infty(V),\qquad \lambda\in\Delta.\] Choose an arbitrary point \(\lambda\in\Delta\). Set \(\zeta = \frac{\lambda-z}{\lambda-\overline{z}}\). Since \(\lambda\) is a point of the regular type of \(A\), then by Proposition 4.18 in  we conclude that \(\frac{1}{\zeta}\) is a point of the regular type of \(V\). Since \(H\) is finite-dimensional, by Corollary 4.7 in  we get \[(H\ominus R(V)) \dotplus M_\zeta = H.\] Applying \(P^H_{M_\infty(V)}\) to the both sides of the latter equality we obtain relation ([\[f3_35\]](#f3_35){reference-type="ref" reference="f3_35"}). \(\Box\) **Proof.** By Lemma [\[l3_1\]](#l3_1){reference-type="ref" reference="l3_1"} we see that the assumptions of Theorem [\[t3_1\]](#t3_1){reference-type="ref" reference="t3_1"} are satisfied with \(A\),\(H\),\(\Delta\) and \(z\). *Necessity.* If \(\mathbf{R}_{s;\lambda}(A)\) admits an analytic continuation on \(\mathbb{R}_e\cup\Delta\), then conditions 1)-3) of Theorem [\[t3_1\]](#t3_1){reference-type="ref" reference="t3_1"} are satisfied and they imply conditions 1)-3) of the present theorem. *Sufficiency.* Let conditions 1)-3) of the present theorem be satisfied. Choose an arbitrary \(\lambda\in\Delta\). Since \(F(\lambda)\) is invertible, the dimension of its range is equal to the dimension of its domain, i.e. to the defect number of \(A\). Then \(R(F(\lambda))= \mathcal{N}_{ \overline{z} }(A)\), and condition 2) of Theorem [\[t3_1\]](#t3_1){reference-type="ref" reference="t3_1"} holds. A similar argument implies that \(R(F(\lambda)-\mathcal{W}_\lambda)= \mathcal{N}_{\overline{z}}(A)\), and condition 3) of Theorem [\[t3_1\]](#t3_1){reference-type="ref" reference="t3_1"} holds, as well. It remains to apply Theorem [\[t3_1\]](#t3_1){reference-type="ref" reference="t3_1"}. \(\Box\) **Proof.** The implication \((b)\Rightarrow (a)\) is obvious. Conversely, suppose that \(\Delta\) consists of points of the regular type of \(A\). If \(\mathcal{M}_\lambda(A) = \{ 0 \}\), we would get \(D(A)=\{ 0 \}\), \(\mathfrak{A}_\infty=\emptyset\), and in this case the moment problem would be determinate (as it was mentioned by the construction of \(\mathfrak{A}_\infty\)). Therefore \(\mathcal{M}_\lambda(A) \not= \{ 0 \}\). The rest is obvious. Suppose that there exists a solution \(M(x)\), \(x\in \mathbb{R}\), of the moment problem ([\[f1_5\]](#f1_5){reference-type="ref" reference="f1_5"}), such that \(M(\Delta)=0\), where \(M(\delta),\ \delta\in \mathfrak{B}(\mathbb{R})\), is the corresponding matrix measure. By Proposition [\[p3_1\]](#p3_1){reference-type="ref" reference="p3_1"} we get \(\mathbf{E}(\Delta)=0\), where \(\mathbf{E}(\delta)\), \(\delta\in \mathfrak{B}(\mathbb{R})\), is the corresponding spectral measure. By Proposition [\[p3_2\]](#p3_2){reference-type="ref" reference="p3_2"} this means that the corresponding generalized resolvent \(\mathbf{R}_z(A)\) admits an analytic continuation on a set \(\mathbb{R}_e\cup\Delta\). In this case, as it was noticed after Theorem [\[t3_1\]](#t3_1){reference-type="ref" reference="t3_1"} relation ([\[f3_25\]](#f3_25){reference-type="ref" reference="f3_25"}) holds. \(\Box\) Consider the indeterminate moment problem ([\[f1_5\]](#f1_5){reference-type="ref" reference="f1_5"}), such as in Proposition [\[p3_3\]](#p3_3){reference-type="ref" reference="p3_3"}, and suppose that condition (b) of Proposition [\[p3_3\]](#p3_3){reference-type="ref" reference="p3_3"} is satisfied. We denote by \(\mathcal{S}_{a;i}(\Pi_{i}; \mathcal{N}_{i}(A),\mathcal{N}_{-i}(A);\Delta; \mathcal{W})\) a set of all functions \(F(\lambda)\) from \(\mathcal{S}_{a;i}(\Pi_{i}; \mathcal{N}_{i}(A), \mathcal{N}_{-i}(A))\), which satisfy conditions 1)-3) of Theorem [\[t3_2\]](#t3_2){reference-type="ref" reference="t3_2"} with \(z=i\). Notice that \(M_1 := \mathop{\rm Lin}\nolimits\{ g_0, g_1..., g_{\tau-1}, x_0, x_1...,x_{N-1} \} = H\). In fact, by the induction argument we may check that \(\{ x_n \}_{n=0}^{kN+N-1}\subseteq M_1\), \(k=0,1...,d\). Apply the Gram-Schmidt orthogonalization procedure to the following sequence: \[g_0, g_1..., g_{\tau-1}, x_0, x_1...,x_{N-1}.\] Observe that the first \(\tau\) elements are already orthonormal. During the orthogonalization of the rest \(N\) elements we shall obtain an orthonormal set \(\mathfrak{A}^\lambda_+ = \{ g_j' \}_{j=0}^{\delta-1}\). Observe that \(\mathfrak{A}^\lambda_+\) is an orthonormal basis in \(\mathcal{N}_\lambda(A)\), \(\lambda\in\Delta\). Let \(\mathcal{M}_{S_\lambda}\) (\(\mathcal{M}_{Q_\lambda}\)) be the matrix of the operator \(S_\lambda\) (\(Q_\lambda\)) from ([\[f3_31\]](#f3_31){reference-type="ref" reference="f3_31"}) with respect to the bases \(\mathfrak{A}^\lambda_+\), \(\mathfrak{A}'\) (respectively, to the bases \(\mathfrak{A}^\lambda_+\), \(\mathfrak{A}_v'\)): \[\label{f3_40} \mathcal{M}_{S_\lambda} = \left( (S_\lambda g_k', u_j')_H \right)_{j,k=0}^{\delta-1} = \left( (g_k', u_j')_H \right)_{j,k=0}^{\delta-1},\qquad \lambda\in\Delta;\] \[\label{f3_45} \mathcal{M}_{Q_\lambda} = \left( (Q_\lambda g_k', v_j')_H \right)_{j,k=0}^{\delta-1} = \left( (g_k', v_j')_H \right)_{j,k=0}^{\delta-1},\qquad \lambda\in\Delta.\] Denote by \(\widetilde{ \mathcal{W} }_\lambda\) the matrix of the operator \(\mathcal{W}_\lambda\) from ([\[f3_30\]](#f3_30){reference-type="ref" reference="f3_30"}) with respect to the bases \(\mathfrak{A}'\), \(\mathfrak{A}_v'\). By ([\[f3_34\]](#f3_34){reference-type="ref" reference="f3_34"}) we get: \[\label{f3_50} \widetilde{ \mathcal{W} }_\lambda = \frac{\lambda+i}{\lambda-i} \mathcal{M}_{Q_\lambda} \mathcal{M}_{S_\lambda}^{-1},\qquad \lambda\in\Delta.\] It is straightforward to check that the transformation \(\mathbf{T}\), defined by ([\[f2_90\]](#f2_90){reference-type="ref" reference="f2_90"}), maps \(\mathcal{S}_{a;i}(\mathbb{C}_+; \mathcal{N}_{i}(A),\mathcal{N}_{-i}(A);\Delta; \mathcal{W})\) on \(\mathrm{S} (\mathbb{C}_+; \mathbb{C}_{\delta\times \delta}; \widetilde X_i; \Delta; \widetilde{ \mathcal{W} })\). Here we mean that \(\mathbf{T} \emptyset = \emptyset\). **Proof.** Observe that by Proposition [\[p3_3\]](#p3_3){reference-type="ref" reference="p3_3"} it follows that \(\Delta\) consists of points of the regular type of \(A\). *Necessity.* As in the proof of Proposition [\[p3_3\]](#p3_3){reference-type="ref" reference="p3_3"} we obtain that the corresponding to the solution \(M\) generalized resolvent \(\mathbf{R}_z(A)\) admits an analytic continuation on a set \(\mathbb{R}_e\cup\Delta\). Let \(F(\lambda)\in \mathcal{S}_{a;i}(\Pi_{i}; \mathcal{N}_{i}(A),\mathcal{N}_{-i}(A))\) corresponds to \(\mathbf{R}_{\lambda}(A)\) by the Shtraus formula. By Theorem [\[t3_2\]](#t3_2){reference-type="ref" reference="t3_2"} we conclude that \(F(\lambda)\in \mathcal{S}_{a;i}(\Pi_{i}; \mathcal{N}_{i}(A),\mathcal{N}_{-i}(A);\Delta; \mathcal{W})\). Therefore \(\mathrm{S} (\mathbb{C}_+; \mathbb{C}_{\delta\times \delta}; \widetilde X_i; \Delta; \widetilde{ \mathcal{W} })\not= \emptyset\). *Sufficiency.* We can choose a function \(F(\lambda)\in \mathcal{S}_{a;i}(\Pi_{i}; \mathcal{N}_{i}(A),\mathcal{N}_{-i}(A);\Delta; \mathcal{W})\). Let \(\mathbf{R}_{\lambda}(A) = \mathbf{R}_{s;\lambda}(A)\) be the generalized resolvent of \(A\) corresponding to \(F\) by the Shtraus formula. By Theorem [\[t3_2\]](#t3_2){reference-type="ref" reference="t3_2"}, with \(z=i\), we conclude that \(\mathbf{R}_z(A)\) admits an analytic continuation on a set \(\mathbb{R}_e\cup\Delta\). By Proposition [\[p3_2\]](#p3_2){reference-type="ref" reference="p3_2"} we get \(\mathbf{E}(\Delta)=0\). Finally, by Proposition [\[p3_1\]](#p3_1){reference-type="ref" reference="p3_1"} we conclude that \(M(\Delta)=0\). \(\Box\) **Proof.** Notice that by Proposition [\[p3_3\]](#p3_3){reference-type="ref" reference="p3_3"} it follows that \(\Delta\) consists of points of the regular type of \(A\). Choose an arbitrary solution \(M(\lambda)\) of the moment problem ([\[f1_5\]](#f1_5){reference-type="ref" reference="f1_5"}),([\[f1_10\]](#f1_10){reference-type="ref" reference="f1_10"}). By the construction of formula ([\[f2_160\]](#f2_160){reference-type="ref" reference="f2_160"}), the corresponding to \(M\) matrix-valued function \(\mathbf{F}(z)\) is equal to \(\mathbf{T}F(z)\), where \(F(z)\in \mathcal{S}_{a;i}(\Pi_{i}; \mathcal{N}_{i}(A),\mathcal{N}_{-i}(A))\) corresponds, by the Shtraus formula, to the generalized resolvent \(\mathbf{R}_z(A)\), related to \(M\). Repeating the arguments in the proof of the necessity of Theorem [\[t3_3\]](#t3_3){reference-type="ref" reference="t3_3"} we obtain that \(F(\lambda)\in \mathcal{S}_{a;i}(\Pi_{i}; \mathcal{N}_{i}(A),\mathcal{N}_{-i}(A);\Delta; \mathcal{W})\). Then \(\mathbf{F}\in \mathrm{S} (\mathbb{C}_+; \mathbb{C}_{\delta\times \delta}; \widetilde X_i; \Delta; \widetilde{ \mathcal{W} })\). On the other hand, choose an arbitrary function \(\mathbf{F}\in \mathrm{S} (\mathbb{C}_+; \mathbb{C}_{\delta\times \delta}; \widetilde X_i; \Delta; \widetilde{ \mathcal{W} })\). Set \(F = \mathbf{T}^{-1} \mathbf{F}\in \mathcal{S}_{a;i}(\mathbb{C}_+; \mathcal{N}_{i}(A),\mathcal{N}_{-i}(A);\Delta; \mathcal{W})\). Repeating the arguments in the proof of the sufficiency of Theorem [\[t3_3\]](#t3_3){reference-type="ref" reference="t3_3"} we obtain that \(M(\Delta)=0\), where \(M\) is the corresponding to \(\mathbf{F}\) solution of the moment problem. The fact that the correspondence between solutions and matrix-valued functions from \(\mathrm{S} (\mathbb{C}_+; \mathbb{C}_{\delta\times \delta}; \widetilde X_i; \Delta; \widetilde{ \mathcal{W} })\) is one-to-one follows from Theorem [\[t2_2\]](#t2_2){reference-type="ref" reference="t2_2"}. \(\Box\)

{'timestamp': '2014-01-22T02:11:35', 'yymm': '1401', 'arxiv_id': '1401.5413', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5413'}

# Introduction {#sec:intro} In recent years, the interest in topological phases of matter and topological phase transitions was renewed by the discovery of topological insulators and superconductors. For noninteracting insulators possible topological states have been classified and the transitions between different topological states have been found to be characterized by closing of the single-particle gap. Much of the recent research has focused on understanding the role of interactions in topological insulators. Of particular interest are interaction-generated topological insulators, or topological Mott insulators. Such states appear due to the presence of electronic interactions that give rise to nonlocal complex bond order parameters and spontaneous breaking of time reversal symmetry. The possibility of realizing novel interaction-generated topologically nontrivial phases, without requirement of strong intrinsic spin-orbit coupling, could significantely extend the class of topologically nontrivial materials and is thus of great importance.\ Interacting spinless fermions on a honeycomb lattice is perhaps the best studied example in which an interaction-generated topologically nontrivial state, a quantum anomalous Hall (QAH) state, is predicted to appear by several mean-field theory calculations. However, recent exact diagonalization (ED) studies of small clusters with periodic boundary condition find no clear sign of a such topologically nontrivial state. In this manuscript we present ED results for small clusters with open boundary condition. Contrary to previous ED studies, we find clear signatures of the interaction-driven topological transition in the fidelity metric and show that the transition is characterized by closing of the excitation gap. We also demonstrate the existence of the edge states in the QAH phase by calculating the density profile of a hole created out of the ground state at half-filling.\ To study properties of the system for larger system sizes we use entangled plaquette state (EPS) ansatz, also called correlator product state (CPS) ansatz, for the ground state wave function of the system and variational Monte Carlo (VMC). In the EPS approach the lattice is covered with plaquettes and the ground state wave-function is written in terms of the plaquette coefficients. Configurational weights are then optimized using a VMC algorithm. Very accurate results have been obtained for several frustrated and unfrustrated models within the EPS approach. The approach overcomes some of the limitations of two main numerical techniques, density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) and quantum Monte Carlo (QMC), that have been successfully applied to study various quantum many-body systems. While DMRG gives very accurate results only in one dimension and QMC suffers from the sign problem for Fermi systems, the EPS and VMC approach can be applied to systems of any spatial dimensionality and is sign problem free.\ The values of the plaquette coefficients that minimize the energy can be found using the stochastic minimization method. Due to the presence of the statistical error in the stochastic algorithm it is difficult to obtain good estimates of the ground state energies for small system sizes. Having a larger number of parameters allows the optimization method more freedom in finding the minimum energy state and the statistical error can be controlled by increasing the sample size. Therefore, instead of comparing the EPS ansatz results with ED results for small clusters, we show that the EPS results for larger system sizes predict the same phases of the system as ED results predict for small clusters. In particular, we calculate within the EPS approach the density profiles and the density-functional fidelity for a range of parameter values. This then provides a confirmation of the validity of the EPS ansatz to describe the ground states of the system and a further confirmation of the existence of the QAH state in the thermodynamic limit, as predicted by the mean-field theory calculations.\ The manuscript is organized as follows. In Sec. [2](#sec:Model){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:Model"} we introduce the extended Hubbard model for spinless fermions on a honeycomb lattice. In Sec. [3](#sec:MF){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:MF"} we review the mean-field phase diagram for the half-filled case. In Sec. [4](#sec:ED){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:ED"} we present results for small clusters with open boundary condition. The results for larger system sizes obtained within the EPS and VMC approach are presented in Sec. [5](#sec:EPSandVMC){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:EPSandVMC"}. In the final section Sec. [6](#sec:Conclusions){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:Conclusions"} we draw our conclusions and discuss possible directions for future research. # Model {#sec:Model} We consider the system of interacting spinless fermions on a honeycomb lattice. The system can be described by an extended Hubbard model \[\label{eq:Hubbard} H =-t\sum_{\langle ij\rangle}\left(c_i^{\dagger}c_j+c_j^{\dagger}c_i\right)+V_1\sum_{\langle ij\rangle}n_in_j + V_2\sum_{\langle\langle ij\rangle\rangle}n_in_j,\] where \(c_i\) (\(c_i^{\dagger}\)) are the fermion creation (annihilation) operators at site \(i\), \(n_i=c_i^\dagger c_i\) is the number operator at site \(i\), \(V_1\) is a repulsive nearest neighbor (NN) interaction and \(V_2\) is a repulsive next to nearest neighbor (NNN) interaction. Here \(\langle ij \rangle\) and \(\langle\langle ij \rangle\rangle\) denote NN and NNN sites \(i\) and \(j\), respectively.\ The honeycomb lattice is a bipartite lattice, consisting of two triangular sublattices further referred to as sublattices A and B. In the noninteracting limit (\(V_1=V_2=0\)) the system is in the semimetal (SM) phase with two inequivalent Fermi points. The NN interaction \(V_1\) is the interaction between NN fermions on two different sublattices and favors charge density wave phase (CDW) with an order parameter \(\rho = (\langle c_{iA}^\dagger c_{iA}\rangle-\langle c_{iB}^\dagger c_{iB}\rangle)/2\). However, the NNN interaction \(V_2\) between NN fermions on the same sublattice introduces frustration that can cause suppression of the CDW order and appearance of the topologically nontrivial states in the phase diagram of the system.\ For the system at half filling predicted topologically nontrivial state is the QAH state characterized by spontaneously broken time reversal symmetry and a nonlocal bond order parameter \(\chi_{ij}=\langle c_i^{\dagger}c_j\rangle\). Properties of the SM-QAH critical point have been investigated in several previous studies and the SM-QAH quantum phase transition was also found at weak interaction and in the presence of strain.\ The mean-field theory calculations also predict charge modulated phase (charge density wave with reduced rotational symmetry) for larger values of the NNN interaction \(V_2\gtrsim 2.5 t\), and Kekulé phase characterized by an alternating bond strength. We review the mean-field phase diagram in the following section. # Mean-field phase diagram {#sec:MF} The mean-field phase diagram for the half-filled case, obtained by Grushin *et al.* is shown in Fig.[\[fig:MF\]](#fig:MF){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:MF"}. For the NN interaction \(V_1=0\) and \(V_2\leq V_{2c}^{(1)}\) the system is in the SM phase, and with increasing \(V_2\) beyond the critical value \(V_{2c}^{(1)}\) there is a continuous transition from the semimetal to the QAH phase and further a first-order transition to the charge modulated phase (CMs) at \(V_2=V_{2c}^{(2)}\). The QAH phase is found for \(1.5\lesssim V_2/t\lesssim 2.5\). In the SM phase that is connected to the noninteracting (\(V_1 = V_2 = 0\)) limit of the Hamiltonian ([\[eq:Hubbard\]](#eq:Hubbard){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:Hubbard"}) there are two inequivalent Fermi points (Dirac points) where two energy bands intersect linearly. In the vicinity of these Dirac points the electrons behave as relativistic two-dimensional massless Dirac fermions.\ The QAH phase is an example of a topological phase that appears as a consequence of spontaneously broken time reversal symmetry. The QAH state has chiral edge states and a nonzero Chern number \(C=\pm 1\). The state is characterized by a complex bond order parameter \(\chi_{ij}=\chi_{ji}^*=\langle c_i^\dagger c_j\rangle\) that corresponds to the complex hopping term of the Haldane model and breaks time reversal symmetry.\ The charge modulated phase (CMs) is characterized by a charge modulation within the same sublattice. The phase is a charge density wave with reduced rotational symmetry and it appears in the \(V_2 \gtrsim V_1\) regime where it becomes energetically favorable to reduce the NNN energetic contribution \(\propto V_2\) by paying the corresponding NN energy cost \(\propto V_1\). The CMs phase is a rather unconventional phase. The phase is a Mott insulator since it emerges from a large NNN interaction strength \(V_2/t\). However, its band gap is determined by the hopping integral \(t\), that is a property of band insulators.\ For \(V_1 > 0\) a CDW phase and a Kekulé ordered phase were also found. The CDW phase with broken inversion symmetry appears for \(V_1 > V_2\). The CDW order with charge imbalance between the two different sublattices reduces the amount of NN interaction energy, and with increasing \(V_2\) a Kekulé ordered phase appears at \(V_2\sim V_1\). The Kekulé phase is characterized by an alternating bond strength, \(Z_3\) order parameter and broken translational symmetry of the original honeycomb lattice that opens a gap in the energy spectrum. # Exact diagonalization results for small clusters with open boundary condition {#sec:ED} Using exact diagonalization (ED) method, we first examine signatures of topological phase transitions for small clusters with open boundary condition. The key signature of the topological phase transition is the existence of a topologically protected level crossing that is robust and defines a topological phase transition even in a finite size system. For the interaction-driven topological transition the level crossing corresponds to the closing of the excitation gap. Accordingly, a topological transition in an interacting system is marked by the closing of the excitation gap. Choice of the boundary condition that can be used to detect topological order in finite size systems depends on spatial symmetries of the system.\ The level crossing can also be observed in the fidelity metric. If we denote by \(|\psi_0(\beta)\rangle\) and \(|\psi_0(\beta+\delta\beta)\rangle\) two ground states corresponding to slightly different values of the relevant parameter \(\beta\), the fidelity between the two ground states is equivalent to the modulus of the overlap between the two states: \[\label{eq:Fidelity} F(\beta,\beta+\delta\beta)=|\langle\psi_0(\beta+\delta\beta)|\psi_0(\beta)\rangle|.\] The equation ([\[eq:Fidelity\]](#eq:Fidelity){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:Fidelity"}) can be rewritten as \[\label{eq:chiF} F=1-\frac{(\delta\beta)^2}{2}\chi_F+...,\] where \(\chi_F\) is the fidelity susceptibility, \[\label{eq:chiF2} \chi_F(\beta)= \lim_{\delta\beta\rightarrow 0}\frac{-2\ln F}{\delta\beta^2}=-\frac{\partial^2 F}{\partial(\delta\beta)^2}.\] The overlap measures similarity between two states, it gives unity if two states are the same and zero if the states are orthogonal. At the point of level-crossing between two orthogonal states the fidelity shows a very sharp drop that corresponds to a singular peak in the fidelity susceptibility. The topological transition can then be characterized by a singular peak in the fidelity susceptibility.\ Since we are primarily interested in examining stability of the QAH phase that is, according to the mean-field theory calculations, stabilized by the NNN interaction \(V_2\), we focus on the case \(V_1=0\) for which the QAH phase is most extended in (\(V_1\), \(V_2\)) parameter space. In the ED calculations the finite size effects can exceed the energy scale of the many-body energy gap of an incompressible ground state, so that the incompressibility can not be recognized. For the topologically nontrivial insulating states choice of open boundary conditions, instead of periodic boundary conditions, changes the energy spectrum of the system by introducing the edge states within the bulk energy gap. In some cases this allows identification of the topological insulating states from the ED calculations, even when such states can not be identified from the ED calculations with periodic boundary conditions. We therefore study properties of the system for several small system sizes and with open boundary condition.\ We present the results for the cluster of 18 sites (two \(3\times 3\) triangular sublattices) illustrated in Fig.[\[fig:C18\]](#fig:C18){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:C18"}, for which signatures of the topological phase transitions predicted by the mean-field theory calculations can be clearly seen. For smaller systems sizes and different aspect ratios (clusters with two \(2\times 2\), \(2\times 3\), \(2\times 4\) and \(3\times 4\) triangular sublattices) we do not observe the level crossings. That is consistent with the previous findings that the topological transitions can be detected by the ED calculations only if one studies clusters with a reciprocal space that contains Dirac points.\ The energies of the ground state and first two excited states as functions of the NNN interaction strength \(\bar{V}_2=V_2/t\) are shown in Fig.[\[fig:E3\]](#fig:E3){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:E3"}. The level crossing at \(\bar{V}_2=\bar{V}_{2c}^{(1)}\) marks the second order transition from SM to QAH state, where the value of the topological index (Chern number) changes from zero to one. The level crossing at \(\bar{V}_2=\bar{V}_{2c}^{(2)}\) corresponds to the first order phase transition from the QAH to CMs phase accompanied with the change of the value of the Chern number from one to zero. The level crossings can also be clearly seen in Fig.[\[fig:Delta3\]](#fig:Delta3){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:Delta3"} that shows the excitation gaps \(\Delta^{(n)}=E_n-E_0\) for the first three excited states (\(n=1,2\) and \(3\)). In addition, the topological transitions are characterized by singular points in the fidelity susceptibility shown in Fig.[\[fig:chi3x3\]](#fig:chi3x3){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:chi3x3"}. The fidelity and fidelity susceptibility are defined by equations ([\[eq:Fidelity\]](#eq:Fidelity){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:Fidelity"})-([\[eq:chiF2\]](#eq:chiF2){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:chiF2"}), where here the relevant parameter \(\beta = \bar{V}_2\).\ We further examine the existence of the edge states in the \(\bar{V}_{2c}^{(1)}<\bar{V}_2<\bar{V}_{2c}^{(2)}\) regime by considering the density profile of a hole created out of the ground state. The energy of single particle (hole) excitation is defined as \(\Delta E_p=E_0^{N+1}-E_0^{N}\) (\(\Delta E_h=E_0^N-E_0^{N-1}\)), where \(E_0^N\) is the ground state energy of the system with \(N\) fermions. The density profile of a hole created out of the ground state is \[\label{eq:DeltaN} \Delta n_j=\langle \psi_0^{N}|n_j|\psi_0^{N}\rangle-\langle\psi_0^{N-1}|n_j|\psi_0^{N-1}\rangle,\] where \(|\psi_0^N\rangle\) is the ground state wave-function with \(N\) fermions. In the presence of the in-gap edge states the density profile should be localized on the edges. The density profile for several values of the NNN interaction strength \(V_2/t\) is shown in Fig.[\[fig:EdgeStates3x3\]](#fig:EdgeStates3x3){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:EdgeStates3x3"}. The results confirm that for the value of \(V_2/t=2\), when the system is in the QAH regime, the density profile is indeed localized on the edges, while for the values of \(V_2/t=0,1.5\) and \(3\), corresponding to SM and CMs regimes, the density profile is delocalized. Note that for \(V_2/t=2\) the density profile \(\Delta n_j<0\) at the sites of the central plaquette and \(>0\) at the sites of the plaquettes at the edges of the cluster.\ We also note that for a finite cluster in the QAH regime the ground state obtained from ED will be a superposition of two spontaneously generated QAH states with opposite chirality (Chern number \(C=\pm1\)). More precisely, the QAH state that we find is a linear combination of the two Haldane states with C=+1 and C=-1 which is odd under time-reversal. This can be seen by considering the time-reversal symmetry of the system.\ For the spinless fermions the (antiunitary) time-reversal (TR) symmetry operator \(T=\sigma_1 K\), where \(\sigma_1\) denotes Pauli matrix and K complex conjugation. The TR symmetry operator \(T\) is an exact symmetry operator of the Hamiltonian ([\[eq:Hubbard\]](#eq:Hubbard){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:Hubbard"}), and therefore it commutes with the Hamiltonian. In the basis of the two states that are related by the TR symmetry, \(|\psi_+\rangle\) and \(|\psi_-\rangle=T|\psi_+\rangle\), the Hamiltonian then has to be proportional to the unit matrix and to \(\sigma_1\). However, although the system has TR symmetry the antiunitary TR symmetry operator squares to one (\(T^2=+1\)), and as such does not imply Kramers' degeneracy. Accordingly, there is no two-fold degeneracy of the QAH phase in the finite size system we are studying.\ The symmetry associated with the two states that cross is the TR symmetry. The QAH state has a different quantum number for the TR symmetry operator than SM and CMs phases. The QAH ground state that we find is the linear combination of the two TR symmetry breaking states which is odd under TR, whereas the SM and CMs phases are even under TR. Since the Hamiltonian can not have matrix elements between states that are odd and even under TR the level crossings are allowed.\ In summary, our ED results show clear signs of an interaction-driven Chern insulator (QAH) phase, contrary to recent ED studies for small clusters with periodic boundary condition. This confirms importance of the boundary condition and the symmetry of the cluster to detect topological order in finite size systems. In the following section we study the ground state properties of the system for larger system sizes to further confirm the existence of the QAH phase in the thermodynamic limit. # The EPS ansatz and variational Monte Carlo algorithm {#sec:EPSandVMC} Studying larger system sizes with ED method is not possible due to the rapid increase in the size of the Hilbert space with the increase of the size of the system. However, recently there has been much success in using tensor network methods to numerically simulate variety of strongly correlated models. In this section we examine applicability of the entangled-plaquette state (EPS) ansatz to describe the ground states of the system. Within this approach the lattice is covered with plaquettes and the ground state wave-function is written in terms of the plaquette coefficients. Configurational weights can then be optimized using a variational Monte Carlo (VMC) algorithm. This then allows to study the ground state properties of the system for larger system sizes and further confirmation of the existence of the QAH phase in the thermodynamic limit.\ For a lattice with \(l\) sites an arbitrary quantum many-body wave function can be written as \[\begin{aligned} \label{eq:wavefunction} |\psi\rangle&=&\sum_{n_1,n_2...,n_{l}}W_{n_1,n_2...,n_{l}}|n_1,n_2...,n_{l}\rangle\\ \nonumber &=&\sum_{\mathbf{n}}W_{\mathbf{n}}|\mathbf{n}\rangle, \end{aligned}\] where \(\mathbf{n}\) denotes the vector of occupancies (\(n_i\in\{0,1\}\) in a fermion system) and \(W_{\mathbf{n}}\) is the amplitude or weight of a given configuration \(\mathbf{n}\). In the EPS description, also called correlator product state (CPS) description, the weight \(W(\mathbf{n})\) is expressed as a product of the plaquette coefficients over the lattice. A correlator is an operator that is diagonal in the lattice basis and can be chosen to act on an arbitrary number of sites. Such a general correlator for a plaquette \(p\) with \(l_p\) sites can be written as \[\label{eq:correlator} \hat{c}_p= \sum_{\mathbf{n}_p}c_p^{\mathbf{n}_p}\hat{P}_{\mathbf{n}_p},\] where \(\mathbf{n}_p=\{n_{p1},n_{p2}...,n_{pl_p}\}\) is the occupancy vector of the sites of the plaquette \(p\) and \(\hat{P}_{\mathbf{n}_p}\) is the projection operator \[\label{eq:P_Operator} \hat{P}_{\mathbf{n}_p}=|\mathbf{n}_p\rangle\langle\mathbf{n}_p|.\] The EPS (CPS) is then obtained by applying a product of correlators to a reference wavefunction \(|\Phi\rangle\) \[\label{eq:EPS_wf} |\psi\rangle_{EPS}=\hat{C}|\Phi\rangle=\prod_p \hat{c}_p|\Phi\rangle.\] For a fermionic system the Jastrow-Slater CPS fermion wave function is obtained by applying a set of correlators (Jastrow factors) to a Slater determinant reference of orbitals \[\label{eq:determinant} |\Phi\rangle=\det|\phi_1\phi_2....\phi_k|\] and the wave function amplitudes \(W_{\mathbf{n}}\) in the equation ([\[eq:wavefunction\]](#eq:wavefunction){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:wavefunction"}) are in this case given by \[\label{eq:EPS_W} W_{n_1,n_2...,n_l}=\prod_p c^{\mathbf{n}_p}_p\times \det |\phi_1(r_1)\phi_2(r_2)...\phi_l(r_k)|,\] where \(r_1,r_2...,r_k\) label the positions of \(k\) occupied sites in the occupancy vector \(|n_1,n_2...,n_l\rangle\).\ Here the Slater determinant ([\[eq:determinant\]](#eq:determinant){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:determinant"}) orbitals can be obtained by solving the noninteracting limit of the Hamiltonian ([\[eq:Hubbard\]](#eq:Hubbard){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:Hubbard"}) with \(V_1=V_2=0\). By applying a product of correlators to a Slater determinant reference wave function the correlations between sites are introduced into the wave function EPS ansatz and are explicitly encoded in correlator building blocks. The wave function of the original system, expressed as the product of the wave functions for sub-blocks (plaquettes) gives reasonable estimates of the ground state energy and short-range correlations.\ The estimates improve with the increase of the plaquette size and also, in general, the greater overlap between the plaquettes gives more accurate description of the ground state. By increasing the number of sites covered by correlators (larger plaquette size) the EPS becomes an exact family of states. However, in many cases even correlators with a small number of parameters can describe the qualitative behavior of large systems. Here we choose 8 sites plaquettes illustrated in Fig.[\[fig:Plaquettes\]](#fig:Plaquettes){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:Plaquettes"} and consider as an example a cluster of \(128\) sites (two \(8\times8\) triangular sublattices) of the same shape as the cluster in Fig.[\[fig:Plaquettes\]](#fig:Plaquettes){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:Plaquettes"} and with open boundary condition.\ Expectation values of the energy and other operators can be obtained by using Monte Carlo importance sampling. In variational Monte Carlo (VMC) the energy \(E\) is written as \[\label{eq:E_VMC} E=\langle \psi|H|\psi\rangle=\frac{\sum_{\mathbf{n},\mathbf{n}'}W^*(\mathbf{n}')\langle \mathbf{n}'|H|\mathbf{n}\rangle W(\mathbf{n})}{\sum_{\mathbf{n}}|W(\mathbf{n})|^2},\] where we assume that the wavefunction \(|\psi\rangle\) is not normalized. The energy can then be further rewritten as \[\label{eq:E_VMC2} E=\sum_{\textbf{n}}P(\textbf{n})E(\textbf{n}),\] where \(E(\textbf{n})\) is the local energy \[\label{eq:En} E(\textbf{n})=\sum_{\textbf{n}'}\frac{W^*(\textbf{n}')}{W^*(\textbf{n})}\langle\textbf{n}'|H|\textbf{n}\rangle\] and the probability \(P(\textbf{n})\) is given by \[\label{eq:Probability} P(\textbf{n})=\frac{|W(\textbf{n})|^2}{\sum_{\textbf{n}}|W(\textbf{n})|^2}.\] The expectation value of any operator \(\hat{O}\) can be written in the same form by replacing the Hamiltonian \(H\) with the operator \(\hat{O}\) in the previous expressions. According to the variational principle minimization of the expression ([\[eq:E_VMC2\]](#eq:E_VMC2){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:E_VMC2"}) with respect to the weights gives an upper bound of the ground state energy. The probability of a given configuration \(P(\textbf{n})\) is never explicitly calculated from the equation ([\[eq:Probability\]](#eq:Probability){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:Probability"}). Instead, the Metropolis algorithm is used to sample the probability distribution and to efficiently compute the overall energy as an average of the sampled local energies.\ The plaquette coefficients that minimize the energy can be found by using the stochastic minimization method which requires only the first derivatives of the energy with respect to the plaquette coefficients given by \[\label{eq:partial_E} \frac{\partial E}{\partial c_p^{\mathbf{n}_p}} =2\sum_{\mathbf{n}}\{ P(\mathbf{n})\Delta_p^{\mathbf{n}_p}[E(\mathbf{n})-\sum_{\mathbf{n}'}P(\mathbf{n}')E(\mathbf{n}')]\},\] where the wavefunction \(|\psi\rangle\) in the equation ([\[eq:E_VMC\]](#eq:E_VMC){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:E_VMC"}) is approximated by the EPS wavefunction ([\[eq:EPS_wf\]](#eq:EPS_wf){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:EPS_wf"}) and \[\label{eq:Delta_EPS} \Delta_p^{\mathbf{n}_p}= \frac{1}{W(\mathbf{n})}\frac{\partial W(\mathbf{n})}{\partial c_p^{\mathbf{n}_p}}=\frac{b_p}{c_p^{\mathbf{n}_p}}\] with \(W(\mathbf{n})\) given by the equation ([\[eq:EPS_W\]](#eq:EPS_W){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:EPS_W"}). Here \(b_{p}\) denotes the number of times the plaquette coefficient \(c_p^{\mathbf{n}_p}\) appears in the product ([\[eq:EPS_W\]](#eq:EPS_W){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:EPS_W"}) for the amplitude \(W(\textbf{n})\) for the configuration \(\textbf{n}\). If each correlator is used only once \(b_{p}=1\). To calculate the ground state energy and the ground state expectation value of any operator \(\hat{O}\), we follow the variational algorithm used in several previous studies of various strongly correlated models.\ For a given set of plaquette coefficients the energy ([\[eq:E_VMC2\]](#eq:E_VMC2){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:E_VMC2"}) and its first derivative ([\[eq:partial_E\]](#eq:partial_E){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:partial_E"}) can be efficiently computed using the Metropolis algorithm. In our calculation the total number of fermions \(N\) is fixed. We start from a randomly chosen initial configuration \(|\textbf{n}\rangle=|n_1,n_2...,n_l\rangle\) with \(\sum_{i=1}^l n_i= N\), and then generate via the Metropolis algorithm a large set of new configurations by exchanging the occupancy numbers \(n_i\) and \(n_j\) at two neighboring sites \(i\) and \(j\). Starting from the configuration \(|\mathbf{n}\rangle\), the acceptance probability for a new configuration \(|\mathbf{n}'\rangle\) is given by \[\label{eq:P_A} P_A=\min\left[\frac{|W(\mathbf{n}')|^2}{|W(\mathbf{n})|^2},1\right].\] The overall energy can then be efficiently computed as an average of the local energies sampled by a Markov chain in the Metropolis algorithm. The first derivative can be calculated equivalently from the same sample.\ It is also important to note that there is no need to compute the wave function normalization at any point in the calculation. The most time-consuming step in the calculation is the evaluation of the fraction \(W(\textbf{n}')/W(\textbf{n})\). However, the configuration weights \(W(\textbf{n})\) are given by a simple product of numbers, and to calculate the fraction \(W(\textbf{n}')/W(\textbf{n})\) it is necessary to calculate only products of the plaquette coefficients that represent sites \(\left\{i\right\}\) where the occupancy numbers \(n_{\left\{i\right\}}\) have changed to \(n'_{\left\{i\right\}}\neq n_{\left\{i\right\}}\). Also, if the Hamiltonian is local, there are only a few nonzero matrix elements \(\langle\textbf{n}|H|\textbf{n}'\rangle\) in the expression ([\[eq:En\]](#eq:En){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:En"}) for the local energy, and only a few fraction terms \(W(\textbf{n}')/W(\textbf{n})\) need to be calculated for each contribution to the energy.\ The values of the plaquette coefficients that minimize the energy can be found using the stochastic minimization method. The steps of the variational algorithm to calculate the ground state energy are: (\(1\)) start from the randomly chosen complex values for the plaquette coefficients, (\(2\)) evaluate the energy and its gradient vector, (\(3\)) update all the plaquette coefficients \(c_p^{\mathbf{n}_p}\) according to \[\label{eq:update_c} c_p^{\mathbf{n}_p}\rightarrow c_p^{\mathbf{n}_p}-r\delta (k)\cdot \text{sign}\left(\frac{\partial E}{\partial c_p^{\mathbf{n}_p}}\right)^*,\] and (\(4\)) iterate from (2) until convergence of the energy is reached. Here \(r\) is a random number between 0 and 1, and \(\delta(k)\) is the step size for a given iteration \(k\).\ The energy and its derivative are estimated from \(3\times F(k)\times l\) sampled values in each iteration \(k\), where \(l\) is the number of lattice sites and \(F(k)\) is called the number of sweeps per sample. In a given sweep each lattice site is visited sequentially and a move \(\textbf{n} \rightarrow \textbf{n}'\) to a new configuration is proposed by exchanging the occupancy numbers \(n_i\) and \(n_j\) of two neighboring sites \(i\) and \(j\) (3 NN for each lattice site). Also, to achieve convergence and reach the optimal energy value it is important to carefully tune the gradient step \(\delta(k)\). For each iteration \(k\), the number of sweeps \(F\) is increased linearly, \(F=F_0k\), and the procedure of evaluating the energy and updating the coefficients is repeated \(G=G_0k\) times. The step size is gradually reduced per iteration. Here we use a geometric form \(\delta =\delta_0Q^k\) with \(Q=0.9\).\ The number of sweeps per iteration is increased because the derivatives become smaller as the energy minimum is approached and require more sampling in order not to be dominated by noise. Increasing G effectively corresponds to a slower cooling rate. Here we take \(F_0=10\), \(G_0=10\) and \(Q=0.9\). The initial minimization routine is performed with \(\delta_0=0.05\) for 50 iterations. The resulting plaquette coefficients are then used as a starting point for a new run of 50 iterations with \(\delta_0=0.005\). After the minimization is complete the expectation values are calculated by repeating the procedure for a single iteration with zero step size and large \(F\) and \(G\) to obtain more accurate estimates of the expectation values. The results for the ground state energy as a function of the NNN interaction strength \(V_2/t\) (\(V_1=0\)) for the 128 sites cluster with open boundary condition are shown in Fig. [\[fig:E0_EPS\]](#fig:E0_EPS){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:E0_EPS"}.\ To confirm the topological phase transitions found for the smaller system sizes we further calculate the density-functional fidelity and its susceptibility for the 128 sites cluster. The density-functional fidelity measures the similarity between density distributions of two ground states in parameter space. As explained in Sec.[4](#sec:ED){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:ED"} the topological transition can be characterized by a singular peak in the fidelity susceptibility ([\[eq:chiF2\]](#eq:chiF2){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:chiF2"}). However, according to the Hohenberg-Kohn theorems the ground state properties of a quantum many-body system are uniquely determined by the density distribution \(n_{\textbf{r}}\) that minimizes the ground-state energy functional \(E_0\left[n_{\textbf{r}}\right]\). Therefore the most relevant information about the ground state of the system is captured by the density distribution and any change in the structure of the wavefunction corresponds to a change of the density distribution. Accordingly the topological phase transition can be found by calculating the similarity between density distributions and is characterized by a singular peak in the density-functional fidelity susceptibility. Moreover, the density-functional fidelity can be easily measured in experiments and provides a strategy to study quantum critical phenomena both theoretically and experimentally.\ The density distribution can be obtained as \[\label{eq:density} n_{\textbf{r}} = \langle \Psi_0(\beta)|\hat{n}_{\textbf{r}}|\Psi_0(\beta)\rangle,\] where \(\textbf{r}=(x,y)\) denotes sites of the honeycomb lattice, \(\hat{n}_{\textbf{r}}=c^\dagger_{\textbf{r}}c_{\textbf{r}}\) is the number operator at site \(\textbf{r}\), and \(\beta\) is the relevant parameter in the Hamiltonian (here \(\beta=V_2/t\)). The density-functional fidelity for two ground states at \(\beta\) and \(\beta'\) is given by \[\label{eq:DFF} F_n(\beta,\beta')=\text{tr}\sqrt{n(\beta)n(\beta')},\] where \[\label{eq:DFF2} n=\sum_{\textbf{r}}n_{\textbf{r}}|\textbf{r}\rangle\langle\textbf{r}|.\] The equation ([\[eq:DFF\]](#eq:DFF){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:DFF"}) can be rewritten as \[\label{eq:DFF3} F_n(\beta,\beta+\delta\beta)= 1-\frac{(\delta\beta)^2}{2}\chi_{F_n}+...\] where \(\delta\beta=\beta-\beta'\) and the density-functional fidelity susceptibility \(\chi_{F_n}\) has the form \[\label{eq:DFF4} \chi_{F_n}=\sum_{\textbf{r}}\frac{1}{4n_{\textbf{r}}}\left(\frac{\partial n_{\textbf{r}}}{\partial \beta}\right)^2\] Density-functional fidelity is a functional of \(n_{\textbf{r}}\) and \(\partial n_{\textbf{r}}/\partial \beta\) that both maximize the density-functional fidelity susceptibility ([\[eq:DFF4\]](#eq:DFF4){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:DFF4"}) at the critical point (for example if the density in a certain region vanishes rapidly).\ The topological phase transitions from SM to QAH phase and from QAH phase to CMs phase for 128 sites cluster, characterized by singular points in the density-functional fidelity susceptibility, can be clearly seen in Fig.[\[fig:DFFS\]](#fig:DFFS){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:DFFS"}. Also, a charge modulation within the same sublattice in the CMs phase can be clearly seen in the density distribution as shown in Fig.[\[fig:n_2.8\]](#fig:n_2.8){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:n_2.8"}, while the charge modulation is absent in the QAH phase (Fig.[\[fig:n_1.8\]](#fig:n_1.8){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:n_1.8"}). Our results indicate that for the 128 sites cluster and at \(V_1=0\) the QAH phase is found for \(1.6\lesssim V_2/t\lesssim 2.6\), that is very close to the mean-field theory predictions for the system in the thermodynamic limit and to the ED result obtained for a much smaller system size (18 site cluster).\ We also note that in the thermodynamic limit the two lowest energy states, that are odd and even under TR, become exactly degenerate in the QAH regime. Consequantly there are two degenerate QAH ground states with oposite chirality (Chern number \(C=\pm 1\)) in the thermodynamic limit. That also leads to the disappearance of the cusp in the energy as a function of \(V_2/t\) at the SM-QAH phase transition, and confirms that the SM-QAH transition is a continuous phase transition as predicted by the mean-field theory calculations.\ In summary, our results obtained using the EPS ansatz for the ground state wavefunction and VMC indicate existence of the QAH state for larger system sizes and provide further confirmation of the presence of the QAH phase in the thermodynamic limit, as predicted by several mean-field theory calculations. This is in contrast to the previous results obtained using ED method for small clusters with periodic boundary condition and cluster perturbation theory. # Conclusions {#sec:Conclusions} We have studied the system of interacting spinless fermions on a honeycomb lattice. Using exact diagonalization method for small system sizes, and entangled-plaquette state ansatz and variational Monte Carlo method for larger system sizes, we find evidence for the existence of the interaction generated quantum Hall state previously predicted by several mean-field theory calculations. In particular, we presented results for 18 sites cluster and 128 sites cluster with open boundary condition. We find clear signs of the predicted topological phase transitions (from semimetal to interaction-generated quantum Hall state and from quantum Hall state to charge modulated state) in the fidelity metric and also demonstrate the appearance of the sublattice charge modulation in the charge modulated phase by calculating the density profile for the 128 sites cluster. The quantum Hall state was not found in the previous exact diagonalization studies of small clusters with periodic boundary condition. Our results thus indicate importance of the boundary condition and the symmetry of the cluster to detect topological order in finite size systems. The results also confirm validity of the Jastrow-Slater entangled-plaquette state (correlator-product state) ansatz to describe the ground states of the system.\ Further work is necessary for more direct comparison of the entangled-plaquette state ansatz results with the exact diagonalization results for small clusters. As mentioned before, a disadvantage of the variational Monte Carlo stochastic algorithm is the presence of the statistical error which can be controlled by increasing the system size. To obtain the results that can be directly compared with the exact diagonalization results for small clusters it is therefore necessary to use nonstochastic algorithm to evaluate the energy and to optimize the amplitudes of the entangled-plaquette state wavefunction. Also, further insights could be obtained by considering the results using different types of correlators (plaquettes of different shapes and sizes). Additional directions of future research are to study the ground states of the system at nonzero nearest neighbor interaction strength \(V_1\) and possible topological phases of the system away from half-filling that are predicted by mean-field theory calculations. We hope that the results presented in this manuscript will motivate further studies of the extended Hubbard model for fermions on a honeycomb lattice and other models for which the interaction-generated topologically nontrivial phases have been predicted.

{'timestamp': '2014-04-04T02:09:37', 'yymm': '1401', 'arxiv_id': '1401.5680', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5680'}

# Abstract {#abstract .unnumbered} A quaternionic commutator bracket for position and momentum shows that the quaternionic wave function, *viz.* \(\widetilde{\psi}=(\frac{i}{c}\,\psi_0\,,\vec{\psi})\), represents a state of a particle with orbital angular momentum, \(L=3\,\hbar\), resulting from the internal structure of the particle. This angular momentum can be attributed to spin of the particle. The vector \(\vec{\psi}\), points along the direction of \(\vec{L}\). When a charged particle is placed in an electromagnetic fields the interaction energy reveals that the magnetic moments interact with the electric and magnetic fields giving rise to terms similar to Aharonov-Bohm and Aharonov-Casher effects. # Introduction In quantum mechanics particles are described by relativistic or non-relativistic wave equations. Each equation associates a spin state of the particle to its wave equation. For instance, Schrodinger equation applies to the spin-0 particles in the non-relativistic domain, while the appropriate relativistic equation for spin-0 particles is the Klein-Gordon equation. The relativistic spin-1/2 particles are governed by the Dirac equation. Recall that this equation reduces, in the non-relativistic limit, to the Schrodinger- Pauli equation. Particles with spin-1 are described by Maxwell equations. Charged particles interact with the electromagnetic field. The effect of the interaction of these particles is obtained via the *minimal coupling* ansatz, where the momentum of the free particle (\(p_\mu\)) is replaced by \(p_\mu+q A_\mu\), where \(A_\mu\) is the photon field. With this prescription, Dirac equation as well as the Schrodinger-Pauli equation predict the existence of spin for the electron through the interaction of its magnetic moment with magnetic field present. Thus, the spin angular momentum is deemed to be a quantum phenomenon having no classical analogue. Hence, the spin is an intrinsic property of a quantum particle. Therefore, the spin is not a result of the rotation of a point quantum particle (like the electron). It could be associated with the space in which the particle is defined. In our new formulation the particle is defined by the scalar and vector wavefunctions. The spin angular momentum can be defined in terms of these vector and scalar wavefunctions. In a recent paper, we have unified the above three quantum wave equations in a single equation. We call this equation a unified quantum wave equation. In the present work, we would like to investigate the nature of spin relying on our unified quantum wave equation, and using the quaternionic commutator bracket between position and momentum, *viz.*, \(\left[x_i\,,p_j\right]=i\hbar\,\delta_{ij}\). This bracket is a fundamental cornerstone in formulating quantum mechanics. Such a generalization led to interesting physical results pertaining to the nature of the wave equation describing quantum particles. We have found that an intrinsic angular momentum, related to its internal nature a quantum particle, is associated with the quaternionic wave function \(\widetilde{\psi}\) that we recently found. It is generally understood that spin is not due to the point-particle rotation. This is true if we treat a particle as a point particle. But, we have recently shown that the wavy nature of a quantum particle due to its wavepacket nature undergoes an internal rotation. A wavepacket consists of two waves moving in opposite directions with speed of light. If a quantum particle is thought of a wavepacket or an extended object, then an internal rotation is plausible. Our current investigations revealed that the scalar (\(\psi_0\)) and vector (\(\vec{\psi}\)) wavefunctions describe a particle with internal orbital angular momentum, \(L=\hbar\) ; and that the vector \(\vec{\psi}\) is directed a long the direction of \(\vec{L}\). This internal angular momentum can be attributed to some kind of spin. These may define the helicity states of the quantum particle. Such states can be compared with spinor representation of Dirac equation. When a charged particle is placed in an electromagnetic field, the magnetic moments ineteract with both electric and magnetic fields giving rise to Aharonov-Bohm and Aharonov-Casher effects. # The fundamental commutator bracket The position and momentum commutation relation in quaternionic now reads \[\left[\widetilde{X}\,, \widetilde{P}\right]\widetilde{\psi}=i\hbar\,\widetilde{\psi}\,,\] where \[\widetilde{X}=\left(ict\,, \vec{r}\right)\,,\,\,\, \widetilde{P}=\left(i\frac{E}{c}\,, \vec{p}\right),\,\,\, \widetilde{\psi}=\left(\frac{i}{c}\,\psi_0\,, \vec{\psi}\right)\.\] The multiplication of two quaternions, \(\widetilde{A}=\left(a_0\,, \vec{a}\right),\,\widetilde{B}=\left(b_0\,, \vec{b}\right)\) is given by \[\widetilde{A}\,\widetilde{B}=\left(a_0b_0-\vec{a}\cdot\vec{b}\,, a_0\vec{b}+\vec{a}b_0+\vec{a}\times\vec{b}\right)\.\] Using eq.(3) and the fact that in quantum mechanics, \(\vec{p}=-i\hbar\vec{\nabla}\) and \(E=i \hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\), and eq.(1) to get \[\vec{L}\cdot\vec{\psi}=\frac{3\hbar}{c}\,\psi_0\,,\] \[\vec{L}\,\psi_0=3\hbar\,c\,\vec{\psi}\,,\] and \[\vec{L}\times\vec{\psi}=0\.\] Equation (5) states \(\vec{L}\) transform the scalar wavefunction \(\psi_0\) into the vector wavefunction \(\vec{\psi}\)Ṅotice however that in quantum mechanics, \(\vec{L}\times\vec{L}=i\hbar\vec{L}\). But according to eq.(5) and (6), \(\vec{L}\times\vec{L}=0\). Thus, the physical meaning of \(\psi\) has now become clear. We have recently developed the quaternionic quantum mechanics but the physical meaning of the quaternion wavefunction remained unsorted. Now take the dot product of eq.(5) with \(\vec{L}\) and use eq.(4) to get \[L^2\psi_0=9\,\hbar^2\,\psi_0\.\] Similarly, multiplying eq.(4) by \(\vec{L}\) (from right) and using eq.(5) and, the vector identity \(\vec{A}\times(\vec{A}\times{B})=\vec{A}(\vec{A}\cdot{B})-A^2\vec{B}\), we obtain \[L^2\vec{\psi}=9\,\hbar^2\,\vec{\psi}\.\] Hence, the quaternion components, \(\psi_0\) and \(\vec{\psi}\) represent a state of a particle with a total orbital angular momentum of \[L=3\,\hbar\.\] This is a quite interesting result. It seems that this angular momentum arises from an internal degree of freedom. It may result from a rotation of some internal structure of the particle. In Dirac's theory the spin of the electron doesn't emerge from the equation to be 1/2, but is deduced to be 1/2 from the way the electron interacts with the photon field. We have shown recently that the unified quantum wave equations are \[\vec{\nabla}\cdot\vec{\psi}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \psi_0}{\partial t}-\frac{m_0}{\hbar}\,\psi_0=0\,,\] \[\vec{\nabla}\psi_0-\frac{\partial \vec{\psi}}{\partial t}-\frac{m_0c^2}{\hbar }\,\vec{\psi}=0\,,\] and \[\vec{\nabla}\times\vec{\psi}=0\.\] In the ordinary quantum mechanics, a particle is described by a scalar or spinor, however, a particle is now described by a scalar and a vector. In all a particle is described by a four component function. In electromagnetism, the electromagnetic fields \(\vec{E}\) and \(\vec{B}\) are vector field. But at the fundamental level these two field are represented by a scalar field \(\varphi\) and a vector field \(\vec{A}\), respectively. In this manner, at the fundamental level, a particle should be described by some similar fields, which are here \(\psi_0\) and \(\vec{\psi}\). This makes the analogy between the field and particle representations symmetric. The electromagnetic wave is transverse, i.e., \(\vec{E} \bot \vec{B}\bot \vec{k}\), while a particle wave is longitudinal. In our formulation, this feature is very clear. Equation (6) states that the spin direction is along the direction of the field \(\vec{\psi}\). As for photons, which are described by their polarization a quantum particle should have some similar ansatz, where the spin is directly associated with the particle wavefunction. Thus, the wavefunction incorporates the spin states. In Dirac theory the spin is deduced from the interaction of the electron with the photon magnetic field. In Schrodinger-Pauli theory the spin of the electron is also deduced from their equation in the way the electron spin is coupled to the photon magnetic field. In ordinary quantum mechanics, the spin of the particle does not emerge from its wavefunction, but eqs.(7) and (8) show that it does in our present formulation. And if \(\psi_0=-\vec{v}\cdot\vec{\psi}\), i.e., when \(\vec{\psi}\) is projected along the direction of motion, then \[i\,\hbar\frac{d\psi_0}{dt}=m_0c^2\psi_0\,,\qquad i\,\hbar\frac{d\vec{\psi}}{dt}=m_0c^2\vec{\psi}\.\] Now differentiate eq.(5) with respect to time and use eq.(13) to obtain \[\frac{d\vec{L}}{dt}=0\.\] this implies that the orbital angular momentum is a constant of motion. It is thus a conserved quantity. Moreover, if we take the dot product of eq.(11) with \(\vec{L}\) and use eqs.(4), (5) and (10) then \[\frac{\partial \vec{L}}{\partial t}\cdot\vec{\psi}=0\.\] and if we use the fact that \[\frac{d\vec{L}}{dt}=\frac{\partial \vec{L}}{\partial t}+\vec{v}\cdot\vec{\nabla}\vec{L}\,,\] then eq.(15) implies that \[\frac{d\vec{L}}{dt}\cdot\vec{\psi}=0\.\] Thus, either \(\vec{L}\) is conserved or the external torque, \(\vec{\tau}=\frac{d\vec{L}}{dt}\), is perpendicular to \(\vec{\psi}\). Thus, the internal rotation of the particle is due to the self-interaction (internal constituents) of the particle. Now apply the condition, \(\psi_0=-\vec{v}\cdot\vec{\psi}\), in eqs.(4), (5) and (6), and using eq.(9), yield \[\hat{L}\cdot\vec{v}=-c\,,\qquad \hat{L}=\frac{\vec{L}}{L}\.\] This shows that \(\vec{L}\) is along the opposite direction of motion and that the particle moves with speed of light. Now let us choose \[\vec{\psi}=\frac{1}{c}\,\vec{\sigma}\,\psi_0\,,\] where \(\sigma\) are the Pauli matrices. In this case, \(\vec{\psi}\) would represent a spin vector wave. Apply eq.(18) in eqs.(5) and (6) to obtain \[\vec{L}=3\,\hbar\,\vec{\sigma}\.\] If substitute eq.(19) in the condition \(\psi_0=-\vec{v}\cdot\vec{\psi}\), we will obtain \[\vec{\sigma}\cdot\frac{\vec{v}}{c}=-1\.\] This shows that the spin component is antiparallel to the direction of motion. This case agrees with that in eq.(18). Hence, the particle is left-handed! It seems that there is some internal degree of freedom (angular momentum) associated with quaternionic particles. Or alternatively, that the quaternionic space has some twisting properties. # Interaction energy Let us now consider the interaction energy (\(U\)) of the magnetic dipoles in the presence of electromagnetic fields. This energy is due to spin (\(\vec{S}\)) and orbital angular momentum (\(\vec{L}\)) and the corresponding moments associated with them, \(\vec{\mu}_s\) and \(\vec{\mu}_\ell\). The quaternionic form of the total angular momentum is defined as \[\tilde{J}=(0\,,\vec{L}-i\,\vec{S})\.\] The corresponding interaction energy can be written as \[\tilde{U}=(iU\,,\vec{\tau})=-\tilde{\mu}\tilde{F}\,,\] where \[\tilde{\mu}=(0\,, \vec{\mu}_\ell-i\,\vec{\mu}_s)\,,\qquad \tilde{F}=(0\,, \frac{\vec{E}}{c}+i\,\vec{B})\.\] When the dipole magnetic moment is placed in an external magnetic field, it experiences a torque (\(\vec{\tau}\)). The torque tends to align the dipole with the field. But when the interaction energy is constant, the dipole moment precesses with the magnetic field. Substituting eq.(24) in eq.(23) and equating the real and imaginary parts of the resulting equations yield \[U=-\vec{\mu}_\ell\cdot\frac{\vec{E}}{c}-\vec{\mu}_s\cdot\vec{B}\,, \qquad \vec{\mu}_\ell\cdot\vec{B}=\vec{\mu}_s\cdot\frac{\vec{E}}{c}\,,\qquad \vec{\tau}=\vec{\mu}_s\times\vec{B}+\vec{\mu}_\ell\times\frac{\vec{E}}{c}\,,\qquad \vec{\mu}_\ell\times\vec{B}=\vec{\mu}_s\times\frac{\vec{E}}{c}\.\] Equation (25) encompasses all possible terms that may arise due to the presence of \(\vec{\mu}_s\) and \(\vec{\mu}_\ell\). The interaction of a magnetic moment with electric field has not been considered widely by physicists, and hence this term is deemed to vanish. This term violates parity and time reversal invariance but respects rotational invariance. Owing to duality between electric and magnetic fields, we trust such terms should be present. It is shown by Aharonov-Casher that a phase shift occurs for a neutral particle with a nonzero magnetic dipole moment moving in an electric field. This is given by \[\Delta\varphi_{sE}=\oint(\vec{\mu}_s\times\vec{E})\cdot d\vec{r}\.\] Using eq.(25) this is transformed into \[\Delta\varphi_{\ell B}=\oint (c\,\vec{\mu}_\ell\times\vec{B})\cdot d\vec{r}\.\] This states that the effect of a spin magnetic moment in an electric field is equivalent to an orbital magnetic moment in a magnetic field. Aharonov-Bohm also showed that in the absence of electric field in the region, the phase shift of the particle wavefunction is given by \[\Delta\varphi=-qV\Delta t/\hbar\,,\] where \(V\) is the electric potential and \(\Delta t\) is the time spent in the electric potential. In magnetic Aharonov the phase shift is given by \[\Delta\varphi=q\phi_B/\hbar\,,\] where \(\phi_B\) is the magnetic flux enclosed by the solenoid. The magnetic flux can be written as \[\phi_B=\int\vec{B}\cdot d\vec{A}\,,\] but if \[\frac{d\vec{A}}{dt}=\frac{\vec{L}}{2m}=const.,\qquad \vec{A}=\frac{\vec{L}}{2m}\,\Delta t\,,\] reflecting conservation of the orbital angular momentum in the closed loop, then applying eqs.(30) and (31) in eq.(29) yields \[\Delta\varphi=\frac{q\,t}{2\hbar m}\vec{L}\cdot\vec{B}=\frac{1}{\hbar}\,\vec{\mu}_\ell\cdot\vec{B}\,\Delta t\.\] Comparing eqs.(28) and (32) reveals that \[\frac{d\varphi}{dt}=\frac{qV}{\hbar}\.\] Hence, in the absence of electric field, the charge behaves as a magnetic dipole interacting with a magnetic field. We thus may attribute the effect above to the spin and orbital angular momentum that the charge carries. It is of importance to remark that the rate of change phase in the Josephson junction, that is mediated by Cooper pairs, amounts to double the value in eq.(33).

{'timestamp': '2014-01-22T02:09:33', 'yymm': '1401', 'arxiv_id': '1401.5315', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5315'}

# Introduction In supersymmetric field theories with conserved R-charges, the localization technique, pioneered by Pestun in four dimensions, Kapustin, Willett and Yaakov in three dimensions, and Kallen and Zabzine in five dimensions, provides exact computation of a certain class of physical observables. Once combined with physical considerations, these results provide useful data sets for understanding nonperturbative dynamics. Essential prerequisites to these studies is the construction of supersymmetric field theories on curved backgrounds. It is now understood quite extensively how to put supersymmetric field theories on Riemannian manifolds. The purpose of this paper is to refine previous investigations to the supersymmetric field theories on singular space and its holographic dual. Because of singularities, the base spacetime is no longer a manifold and the previous constructions may fall short of its validity. Nevertheless, in this paper, we shall show that the localization technique can be made to work even on singular spaces provided the theory under consideration is conformally invariant. For concreteness of our investigation, by singular space, we specifically refer to the branched sphere \(\mathbb{S}^3_q\) that is formed from sphere by inserting conic singularities, where \((q-1)\) is a deformation parameter away from the round three-sphere \(\mathbb{S}^3\). The idea is that, firstly, \(\mathbb{S}^3_q\) has the same Reeb vector as the ellipsoid \(\widetilde{\mathbb S}^3_b\) and that, secondly, this space is conformally equivalent to \(\mathbb{S}^1 \times \mathbb{H}^2\), at least, locally. The first point implies that, for \({\cal N}=2\) supersymmetric field theories, the partition function on \(\mathbb{S}^3_q\) is the same as the partition function on \(\widetilde{\mathbb{S}}^3_b\). The second point implies that, if the theories are superconformal invariant, the partition function on \(\mathbb{S}^3_q\) is the same as the partition function on \(\mathbb{S}^1 \times \mathbb{H}^2\). These chain of equivalences also hold for other observables than identity operator so long as they are in the orbit of the conserved supersymmetries on \(\mathbb{S}^3_q\). The above idea also suggests that, in the large \(N\) limit, these SCFTs on the branched sphere \(\mathbb{S}^3_q\) are holographically dual to a topological black hole (TBH) in four-dimensional anti-de Sitter spacetime, whose horizon takes the shape of \(\mathbb{H}^2\). We shall refer this proposal as the TBH / qSCFT correspondence. The black hole is charged, which reflects the fact that conical singularity of \(\mathbb{S}^3_q\) is accompanied by a background vector field dual to the conserved R-symmetry. The black hole is extremal, which reflects the fact that the SCFTs on \(\mathbb{S}^3_q\) preserve two supercharges. To test our proposed TBH / qSCFT correspondence, we computed the free energy and Rényi entropy of the TBHs. The results show perfect agreement with the exact results of the qSCFT in the large \(N\) limit. This paper is organized as follows. In section [2](#sec:qSCFT){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:qSCFT"}, we formulate the qSCFTs--the \({\cal N}=2\) SCFTs on various branched spheres, including \(\mathbb{S}^3_q\). We first analyze the charged Killing spinor equations in the background off-shell supergravity fields. We then compute the partition functions on different branched spheres by localization and show that their form remains exactly the same as the ellipsoidal three sphere \(\widetilde{\mathbb{S}}^3_b\). We analyze the Reeb vectors on these spaces and show that, partition functions only depend on Reeb vectors on branched spheres. Built upon these observations, we extract the partition function of qSCFTs and show that its free energy \(F(q)\) in the large \(N\) limit takes the form \[\begin{aligned} \label{q_free_energy} F(q) = {1 \over 4} \left( \sqrt{q} + {1 \over \sqrt{q}} \right)^2 {F}(1)\. \end{aligned}\] We also extract the Rényi entropy and show that it takes the form \[\begin{aligned} \label{q_renyi} S(q) = {3q + 1 \over 4q} S(1), \quad \mbox{and hence} \quad S(\infty) = {3 \over 4} S(1)\. \end{aligned}\] In section [\[sec:TBH\]](#sec:TBH){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:TBH"}, we study the charged topological black hole solution in the context of four dimensional \(\cal N\[=2\) gauged supergravity. We first analyze the 4d Killing spinor equation on this background and show that the integrability condition determines the BPS condition for the black hole, namely the mass-charge relation. We then discuss two supersymmetric black hole solutions, neutral massless and charged BPS black holes. In section [\[sec:TBH/qSCFT\]](#sec:TBH/qSCFT){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:TBH/qSCFT"}, we show the TBH\(_4\)/qSCFT\(_3\) correspondence. We first fix the charged topological black hole solution by matching temperature and chemical potential to the boundary field theory on \(\mathbb{S}^1\times\mathbb{H}^2\) and compute the free energy and the Rényi entropy, which precisely agree with the localization results ([\[q_free_energy\]](#q_free_energy){reference-type="ref" reference="q_free_energy"})([\[q_renyi\]](#q_renyi){reference-type="ref" reference="q_renyi"}) of qSCFT\(_3\) in the large \(N\) limit. We then analyze the supersymmetry of this TBH\(_4\) and show that it is BPS. We further find the Killing spinor solutions for this TBH\(_4\) and show that it preserves the same number of supercharges as the boundary field theory. We conclude and discuss future questions in section [\[sec:conclusion\]](#sec:conclusion){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:conclusion"}. # qSCFT\(_3\) {#sec:qSCFT} Supersymmetric field theories were constructed on round three-sphere, ellipsoid and squashed sphere . The partition function on \(\mathbb{S}^3\) was found not to depend on the size of \(\mathbb{S}^3\), and this is a consequence of the conformal fixed point the theory flows to. The partition function on \(\widetilde{\mathbb{S}}^3_b\) was found to depend on squashing parameters of \(\widetilde{\mathbb{S}}^3_b\). A refinement of such construction is supersymmetric field theories on a three-sphere with conical singularities. The conical singularity is specified by a parameter \(q \in \mathbb{R}\). We can think of \(\mathbb{S}^3_q\) as a \(q\) deformation of round 3-sphere and \(\widetilde{\mathbb{S}}^3_q\) as a \(q\) deformation of squashed sphere or ellipsoid. In this section, we shall construct supersymmetric field theories on \(\mathbb{S}^3_q\) and \(\widetilde{\mathbb{S}}^3_q\), following the systematical approach , which was initiated in . The construction is based on the rigid limit of three dimensional supergravity that couples to the R-multiplet of the field theory. We are particularly interested in three dimensional \(\cal N\) = \(2\) theories with a \(U(1)_R\) symmetry. Note that such construction is equivalent to the construction of superconformal field theories (SCFTs) on curved manifold, because it is now known that the solutions to the conformal Killing spinor equations are closely related to the solutions of the Killing spinor equations we will solve in this section [^1]. Therefore, in what follows, we shall not distinguish the two constructions. The Poincaré supersymmetry algebra involving supercharges \(Q_\alpha, \widetilde Q_\alpha\) of R-charges \(\pm 1\) reads \]\begin{aligned} \{Q_\alpha, \widetilde Q_\beta\} = 2\gamma^\mu_{\alpha\beta}P_\mu + 2 i \varepsilon_{\alpha\beta} Z\ ,\nonumber \\ \{Q_\alpha, Q_\beta\} =0\ ,\quad \{\widetilde Q_\alpha, \widetilde Q_\beta\} =0\. \end{aligned}\[ The supergravity multiplet contains the metric \(g_{\mu\nu}\), two gravitini \(\psi_\mu,\widetilde\psi_\mu\), an Abelian two-form connection \(B_{\mu\nu}\) and two Abelian one-form connections \(A_\mu\) and \(C_\mu\). For auxiliary fields \(B_{\mu\nu}\) and \(C_\mu\), the dual of their field strengths are denoted by \]\begin{aligned} \el{strengths_V_H} V_\mu =-i \varepsilon_\mu^{\,~\nu\rho}\partial_\nu C_\rho\ ,\quad H = {i\over 2} \varepsilon^{\mu\nu\rho}\partial_\mu B_{\nu\rho}\. \end{aligned}\[ The metric \(g_{\mu\nu}\) couples to the energy momentum tensor, the gauge connection \(A_\mu\) couples to the \(U(1)_R\) current, and \(C_\mu\) couples to the central current whose charge is the charge \(Z\) that appears in the supersymmetry algebra above. A given configuration of the background fields \(A_\mu, V_\mu, H\) preserves supersymmetry if and only if the variations (parameterized by some choice of \(\zeta\) and \(\widetilde{\zeta}\)) of the two gravitini fields vanish: \]\begin{aligned} \delta \psi_\mu = 0\ ,\quad \delta\widetilde\psi_\mu = 0\. \end{aligned}\[ In Euclidean signature, \(\zeta\) and \(\widetilde{\zeta}\) are independent complex spinors. These conditions essentially give the Killing spinor equation \]\begin{aligned} \left(\nabla_{\mu}-iA_{\mu}\right)\zeta=-\frac{1}{2}H\gamma_{\mu}\zeta-iV_{\mu}\zeta-\frac{1}{2}\varepsilon_{\mu\nu\rho}V^{\nu}\gamma^{\rho}\zeta\ ,\label{eq:Killing_Spinor_Equation} \end{aligned}\[ where a solution \(\zeta\) of it corresponds to a supercharge \(\delta_\zeta\) taking R-charge \(+1\), while a supercharge \(\delta_{\widetilde\zeta}\) of R-charge \(-1\) corresponds to a solution of \]\left(\nabla_{\mu}+iA_{\mu}\right)\widetilde\zeta=-\frac{1}{2}H\gamma_{\mu}\widetilde\zeta+iV_{\mu}\widetilde\zeta+\frac{1}{2}\varepsilon_{\mu\nu\rho}V^{\nu}\gamma^{\rho}\widetilde\zeta\.\label{eq:Killing_Spinor_Equation2}\[ These equations generally tell us what background fields on three-dimensional space \({\cal M}_3\) allow a set of rigid supersymmetries. ## Killing spinors on Branched Spheres {#subsec:Killing} We would like to solve the Killing spinor equations for branched 3-spheres. These equations were analyzed in , where the three dimensional space \({\cal M}_3\) is a Riemannian three-manifold. There, it was shown that three-dimensional rigid supersymmetry requires an almost contact structure on \({\cal M}_3\), much the same way four-dimensional rigid supersymmetry requires an almost Hermitian structure . Here, we refine these results to three-dimensional spaces containing conical singularities. ### \(\mathbb{S}^3_q\) {#S3q_kse} This class of branched 3-spheres can be characterized by deformation of round 3-sphere. A quick way to see this is by dilating the metric while keeping domains of coordinates intact. The metric of the 3-sphere then turns into \]\begin{aligned} \label{3sphere} {\rm d} s^2 = \ell^2 \left( {\rm d}\theta^2 + \cos^2\theta {\rm d}\phi^2 + q^2\sin^2\theta {\rm d}\tau^2\right) \, \end{aligned}\[ where, as said, the domains of \(\theta, \tau, \phi\) are \]\begin{aligned} \theta\in[0,\pi/2]\ ,\quad \tau\in [0,2\pi)\, \quad \phi\in [0,2\pi)\. \end{aligned}\(\) [^1]: See also for exemplification of this in Euclidean three-manifolds.

{'timestamp': '2014-01-22T02:11:44', 'yymm': '1401', 'arxiv_id': '1401.5421', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5421'}

# Introduction {#intro} Modern experimental apparatus allows a Bose--Einstein condensate consisting of a single species of atom to be realised at ultra-low temperatures (typically of the order of nano-Kelvin ). Thermal effects are then frequently considered negligible, to the extent that a Hartree--Fock mean-field approach is often utilised. In this zero-temperature limit, the resultant dynamical description of the condensate is provided by the Gross--Pitaevskii (GP) equation (a cubic nonlinear Schrödinger equation), which propagates a classical field with a form reminiscent of a Schrödinger wave function. One of the basic assumptions in justifying this mean-field description is to assume that effectively all particles have Bose-condensed. Yet interatomic interactions between the individual atoms directly implies the existence of a small noncondensate fraction, for any finite total atom number, even at zero temperature. Such a noncondensate fraction can become non-negligible, particularly at finite temperature, or when there is a dynamical depletion of the condensate, such as occurs when the condensate exhibits non-equilibrium dynamics. There is an increasing interest in multi-component condensates, where in general the noncondensate fraction is likely to be a quantity of experimental significance. It is by now fair to say that single component Bose--Einstein condensates can be created relatively readily. A large number of different alkali atoms (and many of their isotopes), as well as some non-alkali species, have been condensed and we understand well, both experimentally and theoretically, the effect of an applied magnetic field on the \(s\)-wave scattering length through Feshbach resonances. When one considers the experimental realisation of a multi-component condensate, for instance of two-component condensates, then the situation becomes more involved. The scattering lengths must be determined for each atomic species pair, as has been accomplished for example for \(^{85}\)Rb-\(^{87}\)Rb, \(^{85}\)Rb-\(^{133}\)Cs, \(^{87}\)Rb-\(^{133}\)Cs or for \(^{41}\)Rb-\(^{87}\)K mixtures. Variation of these scattering lengths can lead to miscible or immiscible (phase separated) condensates, and a number of theoretical works have looked to establish the equilibrium density profiles and criteria for phase separation. However, there may be a difference in the temperature at which the condensed components are initially held (if condensed separately), and there can easily be situations in which non-equilibrium dynamics are prevalent. A number of studies have reported the development of fundamental instabilities in two-component condensates, such as collective oscillations in colliding condensates, Rayleigh--Taylor-type instabilities, Kelvin--Helmholtz-type instabilities, counter-superflow instabilities, or crossovers between Kelvin--Helmholtz-type instabilities and counter-superflow instabilities. A separate line of studies has focused on "exotic" condensates, such as the spin-orbit condensate, the two-or three-component condensate with a Rabi coupling, spin-orbit together with Rabi coupling, or dipole--dipole interactions in two-component condensates. However, while these studies are often driven by an applied external field such as a potential gradient or a rotation, they are, in general, carried out in the mean-field limit, i.e. formally they assume that there is no noncondensate fraction present in any of the components. Our primary interest in this article is thus to develop a consistent description of the dynamical interaction between condensed and noncondensed fractions of multi-component Bose-condensed systems in order to facilitate an understanding of the dynamics present in the lead-up to instabilities. As such, our description of the condensate-noncondensate dynamics concentrates on situations where the origin of the noncondensate fraction is mainly dynamical, rather than thermal. This approach is particularly suited for a dynamical depletion of the condensate parts, however small thermal fractions can also be incorporated. As such, application of our results to study the effect of spin squeezing in finite temperature condensates is entirely possible. The approach we take builds on the work of, who developed a self-consistent second-order number-conserving formalism for single component condensates, which itself owes its origin to the works of Gardiner and Castin & Dum. The starting point in any such number-conserving description is through the Penrose--Onsager criterion, in which a single-body density matrix is defined in terms of quantum field operators. The subsequent analysis then proceeds by splitting this quantum field operator into a condensate and a noncondensate part, which allows one, through an expansion in terms of powers of the (small) ratio of the noncondensate to condensate particle numbers, to develop a set of coupled equations, describing the condensate with a generalised Gross--Pitaevskii equation, and the noncondensate with modified Bogoliubov--de Gennes equations. The formulation that we develop in this article requires a non-trivial generalisation of this procedure. We must firstly define the single-body density matrix, but since our system contains in general \(n\) components, this definition needs to be adapted to account for those components that are mutually coherent or incoherent. To separate the components into mutually coherent and incoherent sets is merely a formal bookkeeping; each set contains the components which are all coupled through the same one-body term, such as a Rabi coupling term (the elements are mutually coherent), but there are no coherences with respect to all the other sets. The resulting analysis collects the quantum field operators into distinct coherent sets, which is crucial for our partitioning of each operator into condensate and noncondensate parts, and in our definition of the expansion parameter. Through this expansion parameter we are able to derive a set of self-consistent second-order equations which comprise, for each component, a generalised Gross--Pitaevskii equation coupled to modified Bogoliubov--de Gennes equations. In the process of doing so, we also provide general derivations for multi-component time-dependent Gross--Pitaevskii equations, and multi-component equivalents to the non-self-consistent, but nonetheless useful system of the Gross--Piteavskii equation coupled to modified Bogoliubov--de Gennes equations. Despite our concentration on a number-conserving approach, it is pertinent to remark on other possible theories that could be employed, particularly if one were to look to a multi-component condensate in which thermal effects were expected to play a large part in the dynamics. The number-conserving approach explicitly partitions the system into orthogonal condensate and noncondensate parts. In contrast one could employ a symmetry-breaking approach in which the \(U(1)\) global phase symmetry is broken by describing the quantum field operator as a sum of a (c-number) finite expectation value and a fluctuation term around this expectation value. The expectation term is thus, in general, not orthogonal to the fluctuation term. We note that symmetry-breaking formulations can only conserve the mean particle number, as the grand canonical ensemble is required to give the field operator a finite expectation value. The Hartree--Fock--Bogoliubov--Popov or Zaremba--Nikuni--Griffin descriptions of the single component condensate are specific examples of symmetry-breaking approaches, the former of which have recently been applied to two-component condensates. They both rely on a perturbative expansion about a mean-field, which is philosophically similar to the number-conserving approach taken in this paper. Another line of description, for example those that lead to a stochastic Gross--Pitaevskii equation, a projected Gross--Pitaevskii equation, or a stochastic projected Gross--Pitaevskii equation, relies on a c-field method whereby highly occupied modes of the system are described in terms of a classical field. At present, however, these methods are limited---particularly, the latter two "projected" descriptions are only applicable in a high-temperature regime since they do not consider a quantum treatment of the pair-excitation process, a process that drives condensate depletion (see for an overview). A development of these theories to describe the multi-component condensate is certainly warranted, however, we are concerned with a self-consistent treatment of the number dynamics within a multi-component condensate. Our paper is thus organised as follows. Section [2](#form){reference-type="ref" reference="form"} begins by introducing the effective Hamiltonian and the \(n\) quantum field operators and fluctuation operators (expansion parameters). Section [3](#pert){reference-type="ref" reference="pert"} then presents an expansion of the effective Hamiltonian in terms of the expansion parameters, while in Sec. [4](#evolu){reference-type="ref" reference="evolu"} we derive the time-evolution equations of the particle operators and the fluctuation operators. Sections [5](#zero){reference-type="ref" reference="zero"} and [6](#there){reference-type="ref" reference="there"} then proceed to derive the equations of motion that describe the condensate and noncondensate dynamics of the multi-component condensate. This is followed (Sec. [7](#egs){reference-type="ref" reference="egs"}) by specific examples for a two-and three-(mutually coherent or incoherent) component condensate. Section [8](#concs){reference-type="ref" reference="concs"} comprises the conclusions, and is followed by five technical appendices. # Formulation {#form} ## Overview of chosen formulation {#form_1} In this section we introduce the effective Hamiltonian that describes our \(n\)-component condensate. This Hamiltonian will be written down, and developed, in its most general form, i.e. to include the possibility for there to be coherent couplings between any of the components, such as a Rabi coupling or a synthetic gauge coupling. A consequence of including this generality into the Hamiltonian is the need to carefully establish a suitable notation in the subsequent formal development. This takes the form of a partitioning of the sample space of components into coherent subsets, and an associated mapping that takes any given collection of mutually coherent components into a specific subset. Upon establishing this notation, we can write down the single-body density matrix for the \(n\)-component condensate. Our analysis relies on us establishing condensate and noncondensate representations for each component in order to track their dynamical evolution, and so we proceed by partitioning each of the field operators into a condensate and noncondensate part. We will then need to introduce an expansion parameter allowing us to develop a third-order effective Hamiltonian (established in Sec. [3](#pert){reference-type="ref" reference="pert"}). In Sec. [2.5](#form_5){reference-type="ref" reference="form_5"} we define the fluctuation operators, equivalent to small expansion parameters, one for each component, that will be used throughout this paper in order to develop the self-consistent set of dynamical equations describing the \(n\)-component condensate. We will conclude this section by looking at two-and three-component condensate examples in order to clarify the preceding development of the general effective Hamiltonian. ## Effective Hamiltonian {#form_2} Our system consists of an \(n\)-component Bose--Einstein condensate described in terms of \(n\) particle-field operators \(\hat{\Psi}_k\) (\(k=1,\dots,n\)) that are subject to the usual bosonic commutation relations where the index of the particle-field operator may refer to different internal states of the same atomic species or to entirely different species of atom. Here \(\delta_{jk}\) is the Kronecker delta. We consider the system to contain \(N\) bosons that undergo pairwise interactions with bosons in the same component and with bosons in different components. As such, we replace the true interaction potentials \(V^{\text{bin}}\) with energy-independent contact potentials (pseudopotentials), defined as \[V^{\text{bin}}_{jk}(\bm{r}-\bm{r}')=U_{jk}\delta(\bm{r}-\bm{r}'),\] where, for a three-dimensional cold dilute Bose gas, \[U_{jk}=\frac{2\pi\hbar^2a_{jk}}{M_{jk}},\] where \(\hbar\) is Planck's constant, the \(s\)-wave scattering lengths are \(a_{jk}\) and where \(M_{jk}\) is the reduced mass, given by \(M_{jk}^{-1}=M_j^{-1}+M_k^{-1}\) with \(M_k\) the atomic mass of a boson in component \(k\). We call the \(U_{kk}\) the intracomponent coupling and the \(U_{jk}\) (\(j\neq k\)) the intercomponent coupling. In general \(a_{jk}=a_{kj}\) and so \(U_{jk}=U_{kj}\). We note here that the local pseudopotential must be regularised (renormalised according to various quantities appearing in the subsequent development of the theory) in order to avoid ultraviolent divergencies. We restrict ourselves to considering only condensates where there are no spin-changing collisions, i.e. the magnetic sublevels must be resolved, for example through the application of a small bias magnetic field. As such, the only interactions between different components that we consider here are density--density interactions or coherent couplings between internal atomic states. We can then write down the binary interaction effective Hamiltonian for the \(n\)-component condensate as \[\label{Ham} \begin{split} \hat{H}(t)=&\int\sum_{k=1}^n\Big[\hat{\Psi}_k^{\dagger}(\bm{r})H_{\text{sp}}^k(\bm{r},t)\hat{\Psi}_k(\bm{r})\\ &+\frac{U_{kk}}{2}\hat{\Psi}_k^{\dagger}(\bm{r})\Pkd\hat{\Psi}_k(\bm{r})\Pk\Big]\,d\bm{r}\\ &+\int\sum_{\substack{j,k\\j< k}}^nU_{jk}\hat{\Psi}_j^{\dagger}(\bm{r})\hat{\Psi}_k^{\dagger}(\bm{r})\hat{\Psi}_j(\bm{r})\hat{\Psi}_k(\bm{r})\,d\bm{r}\\ &+\int\sum_{\substack{j,k\\j\neq k}}^n\hat{\Psi}_j^{\dagger}(\bm{r}) H_{\text{ob}}^{jk}(\bm{r},t)\hat{\Psi}_k(\bm{r})\,d\bm{r}. \end{split}\] The first term in ([\[Ham\]](#Ham){reference-type="ref" reference="Ham"}) contains kinetic and external potential energy terms, so that a typical single-particle Hamiltonian for component \(k\) is given by \[\label{single} H_{\text{sp}}^k(\bm{r},t)=-\frac{\hbar^2}{2M_k}\nabla^2+V_k(\bm{r},t)+\hbar \nu_{k},\] where \(V_k(\bm{r},t)\) is an external potential (in general taken to be time dependent) applied to component \(k\), and \(\nu_{k}\) accounts for energy differences between different atomic internal states. The terms involving \(U_{jk}\) in the above Hamiltonian \[([\[Ham\]](#Ham){reference-type="ref" reference="Ham"}), second and third terms\] account for density--density (two-body) interactions within and between components. The final term in the Hamiltonian represents any coherent (one-body) coupling of atomic internal states; the precise form of \(H_{\text{ob}}^{jk}(\bm{r},t)\) is not of concern for us in our subsequent treatment of this effective Hamiltonian, however a simple example might be \[H_{\text{ob}}^{jk}(\bm{r},t)=\frac{\hbar}{2}\omega_{jk}\exp[\text{sgn}(j-k)i\theta_{jk}].\] This describes Rabi couplings, where the \(\omega_{jk}\) denote the respective Rabi frequencies between the different component internal states and \(\theta_{jk}\) accounts for any phase (both of which may in general be time-dependent), and the sign function is defined by \[\text{sgn}(j-k)= \begin{cases} +1\quad\text{if}\quad j>k,\\ -1\quad\text{if}\quad j<k. \end{cases}\] Note that \(\omega_{jk}=\omega_{kj}\) and \(\theta_{jk}=\theta_{kj}\) so that the matrices \(\Omega=(\omega_{jk})\) and \(\Theta=(\theta_{jk})\) are symmetric (hence Hermitian). We note that, by definition, \(\theta_{kk}=0\) always. Another possibility would be to consider a synthetic gauge field, such as a spin-\(1/2\) Rashba coupling, in which case one would also expect extra terms beyond those considered in ([\[single\]](#single){reference-type="ref" reference="single"}) to appear in \(H_{\text{sp}}^k(\bm{r},t)\). ## Mutually coherent and incoherent components {#form_3} The effective Hamiltonian has, for generality, included a term determining the internal coupling between all components---manifested by the one-body term \(H_{\text{ob}}^{jk}(\bm{r},t)\). However in the theory that we formulate, we do not impose coherence between any specific components. We will need to include a mechanism by which the precise nature of the condensate can be easily input into the system whilst leaving this precise nature unspecified. To this extent, we denote the sample space of component field operators as \(\mathsf{\hat{\Psi}}=\{\hat{\Psi}_k\}\), where \(k\in [1,n]\). Now define a subset \(p_i\) of \(\mathsf{\hat{\Psi}}\) as a set whose elements are all coherent. We thus have \(l\) (\(l\in[1,n]\)) subsets of \(\mathsf{\hat{\Psi}}\), labelled \(p_i\), such that \[\begin{aligned} \bigcup_{i=1}^lp_i&=\mathsf{\hat{\Psi}}\quad\text{the sample space},\\ \bigcap_{i=1}^lp_i&=\emptyset\quad\text{the empty set}, \end{aligned}\] where \(\bigcup\) represents a union of all subsets, and \(\bigcap\) represents an intersection of all subsets, i.e. the \(p_i\) are pairwise mutually exclusive and exhaustive for \(\mathsf{\hat{\Psi}}\), forming a partition of \(\mathsf{\hat{\Psi}}\). We define \(|p_i|=m_i\) so that \(\sum_{i=1}^lm_i=|\mathsf{\hat{\Psi}}|=n\). Note that if we were to choose an \(n\)-component condensate in which all components were mutually coherent then \(l=1\) and \(m_1=n\), or conversely if we were to choose an \(n\)-component condensate in which all components were mutually incoherent then \(l=n\) and \(m_i=1\) for all \(i\in[1,n]\). There are, in general, \(C\) distinct ways to realise the subsets \(p_{i}\). At this stage we introduce a notation concerning the subset that each component belongs to. We choose component \(k\), with field operator \(\hat{\Psi}_k\), to be in some subset \(p_i\), where we leave the choice of the index \(i\) undetermined. Similarly, we say component \(k'\) (\(k'\) being different to \(k\)), with associated field operator \(\hat{\Psi}_{k'}\), is in some subset \(p_j\) (\(j\in[1,n]\)). The case in which \(i=j\) corresponds to component \(k\) and component \(k'\) being in the same subset---i.e. component \(k\) and component \(k'\) are mutually coherent components (and are necessarily the same isotope of an atomic species with different internal spin states). Conversely the case in which \(i\neq j\) corresponds to component \(k\) and component \(k'\) being in different subsets, i.e. component \(k\) and component \(k'\) are mutually incoherent components (they are different atomic species, or different isotopes of the same atomic species, or even a mixture of different spin states which are not mutually coherent). To account for the structure of \(\mathsf{\hat{\Psi}}\) we define \(p(k)\) to be a mapping for component field \(\hat{\Psi}_k\) to the subset \(p_i\) containing component \(k\), i.e. \[p(k): \hat{\Psi}_k\rightarrow p_i.\] The above is a formal way of stating that we order our component field operators into sets which have elements (component field operators) that are all mutually coherent to one another. In the following we will often make the equivalence \(p_i\equiv i\) for convenience. ## Density matrix and condensate or non-condensate parts {#form_4} Our analysis proceeds as in and we define a single-body density matrix, of form \(\rho_{kk'}(\bm{r},\bm{r}',t)\), for the particles, given as \(\rho_{kk'}(\bm{r},\bm{r}',t)=\langle\hat{\Psi}_{k'}^{\dagger}(\bm{r}')\hat{\Psi}_k(\bm{r})\rangle.\) For our multi-component case, we choose to include a Kronecker delta-type term to account for the fact that components could be mutually coherent or incoherent. Thus we define the single-body density matrix by \[\label{matrix} \rho_{kk'}(\bm{r},\bm{r}',t)=\left<\hat{\Psi}_{k'}^{\dagger}(\bm{r}')\hat{\Psi}_k(\bm{r})\right>\delta_{k,k'}^p,\] where \(\delta_{k,k'}^p\) is a Kronecker delta "mapping" term defined by \[\delta_{k,k'}^p= \begin{cases} 1\qquad{\text{mappings \(p(k)\) and \(p(k')\) are identical}},\\ 0\qquad{\text{mappings \(p(k)\) and \(p(k')\) are different}}. \end{cases}\] This single-body density matrix is Hermitian, and so it can be decomposed into a complete set of eigenfunctions with related real eigenvalues. Since we suppose that each of the individual components is Bose--Einstein condensed, we are free to assume that each component has a single distinct "large" eigenfunction \(\phi_k(\bm{r},t)\). Then each subset \(p_i\) has a corresponding eigenvalue significantly larger than all the other eigenvalues associated with that subset. We define these eigenfunctions to have unit norm and thus write \[\label{N} \sum^{n}_{k'=1}\int\rho_{kk'}(\bm{r},\bm{r}',t)\phi_{k'}(\bm{r}',t)\,d\bm{r}'=N_{c_{p{(k)}}}(t)\phi_k(\bm{r},t),\] where \(N_{c_{p{(k)}}}(t)\) is the eigenvalue associated with the subset containing component \(k\). We call the \(\phi_k(\bm{r},t)\) the condensate parts, and similarly define noncondensate field operators \(\delta\hat{\Psi}_k(\bm{r},t)\) for each component, such that the field operator \({\hat{\Psi}_k(\bm{r})}\) is partitioned as \[\label{cond} \hat{\Psi}_k(\bm{r})=\hat{a}_{c_{p(k)}}(t)\phi_k(\bm{r},t)+\delta\hat{\Psi}_k(\bm{r},t).\] Here, the \(\hat{a}_{c_{p(k)}}(t)\) are annihilation operators for particles in \(\phi_k(\bm{r},t)\) with associated mapping \(p(k)\), and \(\delta\hat{\Psi}_k(\bm{r},t)\) is the part of the field operator \(\hat{\Psi}_k(\bm{r})\) that is orthogonal to \(\phi_k(\bm{r},t)\). As such, the \(\hat{a}^{\dagger}_{c_{p(k)}}(t)\) are creation operators defined as \[\label{a} \hat{a}^{\dagger}_{c_{p(k)}}(t)=\sum^{n}_{k'=1}\delta_{k,k'}^p\int\hat{\Psi}^{\dagger}_{k'}(\bm{r})\phi_{k'}(\bm{r},t)\,d\bm{r},\] and the noncondensate field operators are defined as \[\label{delta} \delta\hat{\Psi}_k(\bm{r},t)=\sum_{k'=1}^{n}\int Q_{kk'}(\bm{r},\bm{r}',t)\hat{\Psi}_{k'}(\bm{r}')\,d\bm{r}',\] where the projector \(Q_{kk'}(\bm{r},\bm{r}',t)\) is defined as \[\label{qdeq} Q_{kk'}(\bm{r},\bm{r}',t)=\left[\delta_{kk'}\delta(\bm{r}-\bm{r}')-\phi_k(\bm{r},t)\phi_{k'}^*(\bm{r}',t)\right]\delta_{k,k'}^p.\] This means that the only nonzero commutation relations that involve \(\hat{a}_{c_{p(k)}}(t)\) and \(\delta\hat{\Psi}_k(\bm{r},t)\), and their Hermitian conjugates, are Introducing the single-body density matrix ([\[matrix\]](#matrix){reference-type="ref" reference="matrix"}) and the partition of the field operators into a condensate and noncondensate part \[([\[N\]](#N){reference-type="ref" reference="N"}) and ([\[cond\]](#cond){reference-type="ref" reference="cond"})\] means that we can define \({\hat{N}_{c_{p(k)}}(t)}\equiv\hat{a}^{\dagger}_{c_{p(k)}}(t)\hat{a}_{c_{p(k)}}(t)\), from which it follows that \[\left<\hat{a}^{\dagger}_{c_{p(k)}}(t)\hat{a}_{c_{p(k)}}(t)\right>=\left<{\hat{N}_{c_{p(k)}}(t)}\right> ={N_{c_{p(k)}}(t)}.\] It is then clear that the eigenvalue \(N_{c_{p(k)}}(t)\) is the mean number of particles in the condensate part with associated mapping \(p(k)\). We note that \[\label{equal0} \left<\hat{a}^{\dagger}_{c_{p(k)}}(t)\delta\hat{\Psi}_{k'}(\bm{r},t)\right>=0\qquad\forall{k,k'},\] stating that there are no simple coherences between the condensate part with mapping \(p(k)\) and (any of) the noncondensate parts. For our system of \(N\) bosonic atoms, we suppose that the total number of condensed atoms is \(N_c(t)\), so that \(\sum_{i=1}^l N_{c_{p{(i)}}}(t)=N_c(t)\). It follows that the total number of noncondensed atoms is \(N_t(t)=N-N_c(t)\). At this point one can define the number of noncondensed atoms: Let \(N_{c_{p{(k)}}}(t)\) be the number of noncondensed atoms associated with the subset containing component \(k\). Then \(\sum_{i=1}^l N_{t_{p{(i)}}}(t)=N_t(t)\). By assumption we have, for all \(k\) and \(k'\), \(N_{c_{p{(k)}}}(t)\gg N_{t_{p{(k')}}}(t)\). ## Fluctuation operators {#form_5} We choose to perform a perturbation expansion on the effective Hamilton ([\[Ham\]](#Ham){reference-type="ref" reference="Ham"}) using "fluctuation" operators defined as \[\label{fluc} \tilde{\Lambda}_k(\bm{r},t)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{N_{c_{p(k)}}(t)}}\hat{a}^{\dagger}_{c_{p(k)}}(t)\delta\hat{\Psi}_k(\bm{r},t).\] These operators scale as \(\sqrt{N_{t_{p(k)}}(t)}\) \[since \(\hat{a}_{c_{p(k)}}(t)\sim\sqrt{N_{c_{p(k)}}(t)}\) and \(\delta\hat{\Psi}_k(\bm{r},t)\sim\sqrt{N_{t_{p(k)}}(t)}\)\], which under our assumptions, are all small. This choice of fluctuation operator allows us to make an expansion of the Hamiltonian in terms of the number of condensate atoms, rather than the total number of atoms, i.e. we are not restricted to the assumption \(N_{c}(t)\approx N\) \[however, we must still satisfy \(N_{c_{p{(k)}}}(t)\gg N_{t_{p{(k')}}}(t)\)\]. In addition, whilst the quasiparticle operators corresponding to \(\tilde{\Lambda}_k(\bm{r},t)\) are only approximately bosonic, from ([\[equal0\]](#equal0){reference-type="ref" reference="equal0"}) we see that the expectation value is exactly equal to zero. These properties mark \(\tilde{\Lambda}_k(\bm{r},t)\) as an appropriate (although not perfect) expansion parameter. For a more in depth discussion on appropriate choices for fluctuation operators, we refer the reader to and references therein. Through this choice of fluctuation operator, higher-order self-consistent equations of motion can be developed. This was precisely the case considered in for a single component condensate, where the authors noted that the pair expectation values \(\langle\tilde{\Lambda}_k^{\dagger}(\bm{r}',t)\tilde{\Lambda}_{k'}(\bm{r},t)\rangle\) always have a finite (and in general) non-zero value in an interacting gas. We call \(\tilde{\Lambda}^{(\dagger)}\) (without a subscript) any member of the set of the (annihilation or creation) fluctuation operators, where it is not important which one it is. An implication is that all equations of motion should be consistently taken to quadratic order in products of the fluctuation operators \(\tilde{\Lambda}\) and \(\tilde{\Lambda}^{\dagger}\). For future use we note that the normal \(\tilde{\Lambda}(\bm{r})\) pair is related to the normal \(\delta\hat{\Psi}(\bm{r})\) pair (similarly to above we define \(\delta\hat{\Psi}^{(\dagger)}\) to be any member of the set of all non-condensate field operators) by \[\label{lams} \tilde{\Lambda}_k^{\dagger}(\bm{r}',t)\tilde{\Lambda}_{k'}(\bm{r},t)= \frac{\left(\hat{a}^{\dagger}_{c_{p(k')}}(t)\hat{a}_{c_{p(k)}}(t)+\delta_{k,k'}^p\right)}{\sqrt{N_{c_{p(k)}}(t)N_{c_{p(k')}}(t)}}\delta\hat{\Psi}^{\dagger}_k(\bm{r}',t)\delta\hat{\Psi}_{k'}(\bm{r},t),\] and the exact commutation relation is given by \[\begin{split} \label{comm} [\tilde{\Lambda}_k(\bm{r},t),\tilde{\Lambda}_{k'}^{\dagger}(\bm{r}',t)]=&\frac{\hat{N}_{{c_{p(k)}}}(t)}{{N_{c_{p(k)}}}(t)}Q_{kk'}(\bm{r},\bm{r}',t)\\ &-\frac{\delta_{k,k'}^p}{{N_{c_{p(k)}}}(t)}\delta\hat{\Psi}^{\dagger}_{k'}(\bm{r}',t)\delta\hat{\Psi}_k(\bm{r},t), \end{split}\] where we have been able to state that \(\hat{N}_{{c_{p(k)}}}(t)=\hat{N}_{{c_{p(k')}}}(t)\) \[and similarly \({N}_{{c_{p(k)}}}(t)={N}_{{c_{p(k')}}}(t)\)\] because of the presence of the Kronecker delta mapping term \(\delta_{k,k'}^p\) that enforces components \(k\) and \(k'\) to be in the same set and hence having the same eigenvalue \[see the definition of \(Q_{kk'}(\bm{r},\bm{r}',t)\) in Eq. ([\[qdeq\]](#qdeq){reference-type="ref" reference="qdeq"})\]. Note that in the second term of Eq. ([\[comm\]](#comm){reference-type="ref" reference="comm"}) we must still explicitly keep this Kronecker delta mapping term to account for the presence of the other terms \(\delta\hat{\Psi}^{\dagger}_{k'}(\bm{r}',t)\) and \(\delta\hat{\Psi}_{k}(\bm{r},t)\) which contain explicit \(k\) and \(k'\) index dependencies. ## Two-and three-component examples {#form_6} ### Overview of key examples The above analysis has been kept entirely general. At this stage it is useful to summarise the analysis by means of a couple of specific examples, the first involving a two-component condensate and the second a three-component condensate. In the following we will make use of the short-hand notations: \(\Psi_{jk}=\langle\hat{\Psi}^{\dagger}_{j}(\bm{r}')\hat{\Psi}_{k}(\bm{r})\rangle\), \(\phi_{jk}=\phi_j(\bm{r},t)\phi_k^*(\bm{r}',t)\), \(\delta_{\bm{r}\bm{r}'}=\delta(\bm{r}-\bm{r}')\) and drop the arguments from the projectors, writing \(Q_{jk}=Q_{jk}(\bm{r},\bm{r}',t)\). In Sec. [7](#egs){reference-type="ref" reference="egs"} we will explore each of these examples in more detail. ### Two-component condensates For the two-component condensate we have \(n=2\) and \(C=2\), which corresponds to the cases (i) two mutually coherent components (\(l=1\) with \(|p_1|=2\)) or (ii) two mutually incoherent components (\(l=2\) with \(|p_1|=1\) and \(|p_2|=1\)). *Mutually Coherent Condensates: \(l=1\)*. When both components are coherent we can write out the single-body density matrix, in the form of a 2 \(\times\) 2 array of operator expectation values, as \[\varrho(\bm{r},\bm{r}',t) = \begin{pmatrix} \Psi_{11} & \Psi_{21} \\ \Psi_{12} & \Psi_{22} \end{pmatrix}.\] As both components are coherent, there is only one eigenvalue \(N_{c_1}\), so that \[\int\begin{pmatrix} \Psi_{11} & \Psi_{21} \\ \Psi_{12} & \Psi_{22} \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} \phi_{1}(\bm{r}',t)\\ \phi_{2}(\bm{r}',t) \end{pmatrix} \,d\bm{r}' =N_{c_{{1}}}(t) \begin{pmatrix} \phi_1(\bm{r},t)\\ \phi_2(\bm{r},t) \end{pmatrix}.\] We thus have a partitioning of the field operators defined by \[\begin{pmatrix} \hat{\Psi}_1(\bm{r})\\ \hat{\Psi}_2(\bm{r}) \end{pmatrix} =\hat{a}_{c_{1}}(t) \begin{pmatrix} \phi_1(\bm{r},t)\\ \phi_2(\bm{r},t) \end{pmatrix} + \begin{pmatrix} \delta\hat{\Psi}_1(\bm{r},t)\\ \delta\hat{\Psi}_2(\bm{r},t) \end{pmatrix},\] where the creation operator is defined as \[\hat{a}^{\dagger}_{c_{1}}(t)=\int\left[\hat{\Psi}^{\dagger}_{1}(\bm{r})\phi_{1}(\bm{r},t)+\hat{\Psi}^{\dagger}_{2}(\bm{r})\phi_{2}(\bm{r},t)\right]\,d\bm{r},\] and the noncondensate field operators are defined as \[\begin{pmatrix} \delta\hat{\Psi}_1(\bm{r},t)\\ \delta\hat{\Psi}_2(\bm{r},t) \end{pmatrix} =\int \mathcal{Q}(\bm{r},\bm{r}',t) \begin{pmatrix} \hat{\Psi}_{1}(\bm{r}') \\ \hat{\Psi}_{2}(\bm{r}') \end{pmatrix} \,d\bm{r}',\] with the matrix projector \[\mathcal{Q}(\bm{r},\bm{r}',t)= \begin{pmatrix} \delta_{\bm{rr}'}-\phi_{11} & -\phi_{12} \\ -\phi_{21} & \delta_{\bm{rr}'}-\phi_{22} \end{pmatrix}.\] Finally we can quote the fluctuation operators: \[\begin{pmatrix} \tilde{\Lambda}_1(\bm{r},t)\\ \tilde{\Lambda}_2(\bm{r},t) \end{pmatrix} =\frac{1}{\sqrt{N_{c_1}(t)}}\hat{a}^{\dagger}_{c_1}(t) \begin{pmatrix} \delta\hat{\Psi}_1(\bm{r},t)\\ \delta\hat{\Psi}_2(\bm{r},t) \end{pmatrix}.\] *Mutually Incoherent Condensates: \(l=2\).* In the incoherent case, we note that there are two subsets, \(p_1\) and \(p_2\), so that \(\delta_{1,2}^p=0\). Our single-body density matrix then reads \[\varrho(\bm{r},\bm{r}',t)= \begin{pmatrix} \Psi_{11} & 0\\ 0 & \Psi_{22} \end{pmatrix}.\] There are now two eigenvalues, \(N_{c_1}\) and \(N_{c_2}\) so that \[\int\begin{pmatrix} \Psi_{11} & 0\\ 0 & \Psi_{22} \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} \phi_{1}(\bm{r}',t)\\ \phi_{2}(\bm{r}',t) \end{pmatrix} \,d\bm{r}'= \begin{pmatrix} N_{c_{{1}}}(t)\phi_1(\bm{r},t)\\ N_{c_{{2}}}(t)\phi_2(\bm{r},t) \end{pmatrix}.\] We thus have a partitioning of the field operators defined by \[\begin{pmatrix} \hat{\Psi}_1(\bm{r})\\ \hat{\Psi}_2(\bm{r}) \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} \hat{a}_{c_{1}}(t)\phi_1(\bm{r},t)+\delta\hat{\Psi}_1(\bm{r},t)\\ \hat{a}_{c_{2}}(t)\phi_2(\bm{r},t)+\delta\hat{\Psi}_2(\bm{r},t) \end{pmatrix},\] where the creation operators are defined as \[\begin{pmatrix} \hat{a}^{\dagger}_{c_{1}}(t)\\ \hat{a}^{\dagger}_{c_{2}}(t) \end{pmatrix} =\int \begin{pmatrix} \hat{\Psi}^{\dagger}_{1}(\bm{r})\phi_{1}(\bm{r},t)\\ \hat{\Psi}^{\dagger}_{2}(\bm{r})\phi_{2}(\bm{r},t) \end{pmatrix}\,d\bm{r},\] and the noncondensate field operators are defined as \[\begin{pmatrix} \delta\hat{\Psi}_1(\bm{r},t)\\ \delta\hat{\Psi}_2(\bm{r},t) \end{pmatrix} =\int \mathcal{Q}(\bm{r},\bm{r}',t) \begin{pmatrix} \hat{\Psi}_{1}(\bm{r}') \\ \hat{\Psi}_{2}(\bm{r}') \end{pmatrix} \,d\bm{r}',\] with the (now diagonal) matrix projector \[\mathcal{Q}(\bm{r},\bm{r}',t)= \begin{pmatrix} \delta_{\bm{rr}'}-\phi_{11} & 0 \\ 0 & \delta_{\bm{rr}'}-\phi_{22} \end{pmatrix}.\] Finally we can quote the fluctuation operators: \[\begin{pmatrix} \tilde{\Lambda}_1(\bm{r},t)\\ \tilde{\Lambda}_2(\bm{r},t) \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} \frac{1}{\sqrt{N_{c_1}(t)}}\hat{a}^{\dagger}_{c_1}(t)\delta\hat{\Psi}_1(\bm{r},t)\\ \frac{1}{\sqrt{N_{c_2}(t)}}\hat{a}^{\dagger}_{c_2}(t)\delta\hat{\Psi}_2(\bm{r},t) \end{pmatrix}.\] ### Three-component condensates Instead, if we have a three-component condensate then \(n=3\) and \(C=3\), which corresponds to the cases (i) three mutually coherent components (\(l=1\) with \(|p_1|=3\)); (ii) two mutually coherent components and one incoherent component (\(l=2\) with \(|p_1|=2\) and \(|p_2|=1\)) or (iii) three mutually incoherent components (\(l=3\) with \(|p_1|=1\), \(|p_2|=1\) and \(|p_3|=1\)). At this point we will only concentrate on case (ii) (the other two cases are similar to the two-component condensate cases above). We say that components \(1\) and \(2\) are mutually coherent (subset \(p_1\)) and component \(3\) is incoherent with respect to the other two components (subset \(p_2\)), i.e. \[\mathsf{\hat{\Psi}}=\{\{\underbrace{\hat{\Psi}_1,\hat{\Psi}_2}_{p_1}\},\{\underbrace{\hat{\Psi}_3}_{p_2}\}\}.\] Our single-body density matrix is then \[\varrho(\bm{r},\bm{r}',t)= \begin{pmatrix} \Psi_{11} & \Psi_{21} & 0 \\ \Psi_{12} & \Psi_{22} & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & \Psi_{33} \end{pmatrix}.\] There are two eigenvalues, \(N_{c_1}\) associated with \(p_1\) and \(N_{c_2}\) associated with \(p_2\), so that \[\int\begin{pmatrix} \Psi_{11} & \Psi_{21} & 0 \\ \Psi_{12} & \Psi_{22} & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & \Psi_{33} \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} \phi_{1}(\bm{r}',t)\\ \phi_{2}(\bm{r}',t)\\ \phi_{3}(\bm{r}',t) \end{pmatrix} \,d\bm{r}'= \begin{pmatrix} N_{c_{{1}}}(t)\phi_1(\bm{r},t)\\ N_{c_{{1}}}(t)\phi_2(\bm{r},t)\\ N_{c_{{2}}}(t)\phi_3(\bm{r},t) \end{pmatrix}.\] We thus have a partitioning of the field operators defined by \[\begin{pmatrix} \hat{\Psi}_1(\bm{r})\\ \hat{\Psi}_2(\bm{r})\\ \hat{\Psi}_3(\bm{r}) \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} \hat{a}_{c_{1}}(t)\phi_1(\bm{r},t)\\ \hat{a}_{c_{1}}(t)\phi_2(\bm{r},t)\\ \hat{a}_{c_{2}}(t)\phi_3(\bm{r},t)\\ \end{pmatrix} + \begin{pmatrix} \delta\hat{\Psi}_1(\bm{r},t)\\ \delta\hat{\Psi}_2(\bm{r},t)\\ \delta\hat{\Psi}_3(\bm{r},t) \end{pmatrix},\] where the creation operators are defined as \[\begin{pmatrix} \hat{a}^{\dagger}_{c_{1}}(t)\\ \hat{a}^{\dagger}_{c_{2}}(t)\\ \end{pmatrix} =\int \begin{pmatrix} \hat{\Psi}^{\dagger}_{1}(\bm{r})\phi_{1}(\bm{r},t)+\hat{\Psi}^{\dagger}_{2}(\bm{r})\phi_{2}(\bm{r},t)\\ \hat{\Psi}^{\dagger}_{3}(\bm{r})\phi_{3}(\bm{r},t) \end{pmatrix}\,d\bm{r},\] and the noncondensate field operators are defined as \[\begin{pmatrix} \delta\hat{\Psi}_1(\bm{r},t)\\ \delta\hat{\Psi}_2(\bm{r},t)\\ \delta\hat{\Psi}_3(\bm{r},t) \end{pmatrix} =\int \mathcal{Q}(\bm{r},\bm{r}',t) \begin{pmatrix} \hat{\Psi}_{1}(\bm{r}') \\ \hat{\Psi}_{2}(\bm{r}')\\ \hat{\Psi}_{3}(\bm{r}') \end{pmatrix} \,d\bm{r}',\] with the (block-diagonal) projector \[\mathcal{Q}(\bm{r},\bm{r}',t)= \begin{pmatrix} \delta_{\bm{rr}'}-\phi_{11} &-\phi_{12} & 0 \\ -\phi_{21} & \delta_{\bm{rr}'}-\phi_{22} & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & \delta_{\bm{rr}'}-\phi_{33} \end{pmatrix}.\] Finally we can quote the fluctuation operators: \[\begin{pmatrix} \tilde{\Lambda}_1(\bm{r},t)\\ \tilde{\Lambda}_2(\bm{r},t)\\ \tilde{\Lambda}_3(\bm{r},t) \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} \frac{1}{\sqrt{N_{c_1}(t)}}\hat{a}^{\dagger}_{c_1}(t)\delta\hat{\Psi}_1(\bm{r},t)\\ \frac{1}{\sqrt{N_{c_1}(t)}}\hat{a}^{\dagger}_{c_1}(t)\delta\hat{\Psi}_2(\bm{r},t)\\ \frac{1}{\sqrt{N_{c_2}(t)}}\hat{a}^{\dagger}_{c_2}(t)\delta\hat{\Psi}_3(\bm{r},t) \end{pmatrix}.\] # Perturbative Expansion of the Effective Hamiltonian {#pert} ## Overview of expansion {#pert_1} We wish to reformulate the effective Hamiltonian ([\[Ham\]](#Ham){reference-type="ref" reference="Ham"}) in terms of the fluctuation operators ([\[fluc\]](#fluc){reference-type="ref" reference="fluc"}). This will allow us to construct a perturbative expansion of the reformulated Hamiltonian in powers of the fluctuation operators (the small expansion parameters). This section will analyse in detail the form of the fluctuation operators and of the number operators, allowing us to make a consistent cubic approximation to the reformulated Hamiltonian. The cubic approximation will then be further developed in Sec. [5](#zero){reference-type="ref" reference="zero"} and onwards. ## Exact reformulation in terms of fluctuation operators {#pert_2} In the following we give the (exact) reformulation, according to ([\[cond\]](#cond){reference-type="ref" reference="cond"}) and ([\[fluc\]](#fluc){reference-type="ref" reference="fluc"}), of the Hamiltonian ([\[Ham\]](#Ham){reference-type="ref" reference="Ham"}), defining \(\tilde{U}_k=U_kN_{c_{p(k)}}\) and \(\tilde{U}_{jk}=U_{jk}\sqrt{\npjN_{c_{p(k)}}}\), and removing time arguments for brevity. We thus write \(\hat{H}=\hat{H}^{(\tilde{\Lambda}^0)}+\hat{H}^{(\tilde{\Lambda}^1)}+\hat{H}^{(\tilde{\Lambda}^2)}+\hat{H}^{(\tilde{\Lambda}^3)}+\hat{H}^{(\tilde{\Lambda}^4)}\), where the expressions for \(\hat{H}^{(\tilde{\Lambda}^i)}\), and brief calculational details to obtain each term, are given in Appendix [\[reform\]](#reform){reference-type="ref" reference="reform"}. The terms of this reformulated Hamiltonian are arranged in orders of powers of products of the fluctuation operators, so that the term \(\hat{H}^{(\tilde{\Lambda}^i)}\) contains products of \(\tilde{\Lambda}\) of order \(i\) (where \(i\le4\)). Our aim is to reduce this Hamiltonian so that we obtain a lowest-order consistent dynamical representation of the \(n\)-component condensate. We will see later that this implies a reduction of the above Hamiltonian to a third-order Hamiltonian (as in the case of a single component ), but before we do, we first need to find an approximation to the number and fluctuation operators. ## Approximations to number and fluctuation operators {#pert_3} The reformulated Hamiltonian ([\[Hamil\]](#Hamil){reference-type="ref" reference="Hamil"}) can be reduced to a third-order Hamiltonian by means, firstly, of the expansion of the condensate number operators and, secondly, by means of a Gaussian approximation to the fluctuation terms. Each subset of \(\mathsf{\hat{\Psi}}\) is in a number eigenstate, having particle number \(N_{c_{p(k)}}\) \[with associated mapping \(p(k)\)\]. This implies that the number fluctuations of the condensate and noncondensate components within each subset must be equal and opposite (see Appendix [\[app_1\]](#app_1){reference-type="ref" reference="app_1"}). To zeroth-(and first-) order in the fluctuation operators, \(\hat{N}_{c_{p(k)}}=N_{c_{p(k)}}\), whereas to second-order we have \[\label{numapp} \hat{N}_{c_{p(k)}}=N_{c_{p(k)}}+\sum_{k'=1}^{n}\delta_{k,k'}^p\int \biggl[ \left<\tilde{\Lambda}^{\dagger}_{k'}(\bm{r})\tilde{\Lambda}_{k'}(\bm{r})\right> -\tilde{\Lambda}^{\dagger}_{k'}(\bm{r})\tilde{\Lambda}_{k'}(\bm{r})\biggr] \,d\bm{r}.\] We can now use ([\[numapp\]](#numapp){reference-type="ref" reference="numapp"}) to express the commutation relation \([\tilde{\Lambda}_k(\bm{r}), \tilde{\Lambda}_{k'}^{\dagger}(\bm{r}')]\) ([\[comm\]](#comm){reference-type="ref" reference="comm"}) in terms of the condensate numbers and expectation values of \(\tilde{\Lambda}_k(\bm{r})\) and \(\tilde{\Lambda}_{k'}^{\dagger}(\bm{r}')\): to a Gaussian level of approximation we may replace pairwise products of the fluctuation operators \(\tilde{\Lambda}(\bm{r})\) and \(\tilde{\Lambda}^{\dagger}(\bm{r})\) by their expectation values. We thus write (see Appendix [\[app_1\]](#app_1){reference-type="ref" reference="app_1"}) \[\begin{split} [\tilde{\Lambda}_k(\bm{r}),\tilde{\Lambda}_{k'}^{\dagger}(\bm{r}')]&\approx Q_{kk'}(\bm{r},\bm{r}')-\frac{\left<\tilde{\Lambda}_{k'}^{\dagger}(\bm{r}')\tilde{\Lambda}_k(\bm{r})\right>}{N_{c_{p(k)}}}\delta_{k,k'}^p, \end{split} \label{flucapp}\] whereas to zeroth and first order, the commutator may be approximated by \[\approx Q_{kk'}(\bm{r},\bm{r}'). \label{fluccomzero}\] ## Reduction to a third-order Hamiltonian {#pert_4} The final step in constructing a third-order Hamiltonian from the full Hamiltonian ([\[Hamil\]](#Hamil){reference-type="ref" reference="Hamil"}) is to consistently deal with the cubic and quartic powers of products of the fluctuations operators. It turns out that the quartic terms can be safely neglected (see an equivalent discussion in ), whereas the cubic terms require a Hartree--Fock factorisation. In general, the Hartree--Fock factorisation is written as \[\begin{split} \label{htf} \tilde{\Lambda}_k^{\dagger}(\bm{r})\tilde{\Lambda}_{k'}(\bm{r}')\tilde{\Lambda}_{k''}(\bm{r}'')\approx&\left<\tilde{\Lambda}_k^{\dagger}(\bm{r})\tilde{\Lambda}_{k'}(\bm{r}')\right>\tilde{\Lambda}_{k''}(\bm{r}'')\\ &+\left<\tilde{\Lambda}_k^{\dagger}(\bm{r})\tilde{\Lambda}_{k''}(\bm{r}'')\right>\tilde{\Lambda}_{k'}(\bm{r}')\\ &+\left<\tilde{\Lambda}_{k'}(\bm{r}')\tilde{\Lambda}_{k''}(\bm{r}'')\right>\tilde{\Lambda}_k^{\dagger}(\bm{r}), \end{split}\] i.e. the cubic products are re-expressed as linear terms modified by a pair average. We can now substitute, consistently, ([\[numapp\]](#numapp){reference-type="ref" reference="numapp"}), ([\[flucapp\]](#flucapp){reference-type="ref" reference="flucapp"}) and ([\[htf\]](#htf){reference-type="ref" reference="htf"}) into ([\[Hamil\]](#Hamil){reference-type="ref" reference="Hamil"}) to give the third-order Hamiltonian \(\hat{H}_3\). For convenience of notation, we split this Hamiltonian into a sum of terms in orders of the powers of the number eigenvalues (again we denote the set of number eigenvalues as \(N_c\)). So we write \(\hat{H}_3=\hat{H}_3^{(N_c^1)}+\hat{H}_3^{(N_c^{1/2})}+\hat{H}_3^{(N_c^0)}+\hat{H}_3^{(N_c^{-1/2})}\) and further split \(\hat{H}_3^{(N_c^0)}=\hat{H}_3^{(N_c^0)_{a}}+\hat{H}_3^{(N_c^0)_{b}}\) and \(\hat{H}_3^{(N_c^{-1/2})}=\hat{H}_3^{(N_c^{-1/2})_a}+\hat{H}_3^{(N_c^{-1/2})_b}\). These expressions, and further details of the calculation, are given in Appendix [\[reform_cubic\]](#reform_cubic){reference-type="ref" reference="reform_cubic"}. Note that \(\hat{H}=\hat{H}_3+\mathcal{O}(\tilde{\Lambda}^4(\bm{r}),N_{c}^{-1})\). # Evolution equations {#evolu} ## Overview of approach {#evolu_1} The rather unwieldy cubic Hamiltonian ([\[Ham3_1\]](#Ham3_1){reference-type="ref" reference="Ham3_1"}) forms the basis of our approach to obtain a consistent set of dynamical equations for the mutually coherent and incoherent condensate and non-condensate parts. To develop these, we will first require expressions for the time evolution of the fluctuation and number operators. We derive these in the next two subsections. ## Evolution of the fluctuation operators {#evolu_2} In general the Heisenberg time evolution of the fluctuation operators is given by \[\label{lambda_time} i\hbar\frac{d}{dt}\tilde{\Lambda}_k(\bm{r})=[\tilde{\Lambda}_k(\bm{r}),\hat{H}]+i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\tilde{\Lambda}_k(\bm{r}),\] where (see Appendix [\[app_2\]](#app_2){reference-type="ref" reference="app_2"}), and where we have used ([\[numapp\]](#numapp){reference-type="ref" reference="numapp"}) to approximate the number operators in terms of expectation values of the fluctuation operators. Equation ([\[fluc_evol\]](#fluc_evol){reference-type="ref" reference="fluc_evol"}) gives us the explicit time evolution of the fluctuation operators. ## Evolution of the number operators {#evolu_3} Similarly, we require the time evolution of the number operators, which can be found from \[\label{num_time} i\hbar\frac{d}{dt}\hat{N}_{c_{p(k)}}=[\hat{N}_{c_{p(k)}},\hat{H}]+i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\hat{N}_{c_{p(k)}},\] where \(\hat{N}_{c_{p(k)}}(t)\equiv\hat{a}^{\dagger}_{c_{p(k)}}(t)\hat{a}_{c_{p(k)}}(t)\). Following a similar procedure to above, invoking ([\[a_delta\]](#a_delta){reference-type="ref" reference="a_delta"}), we obtain \[\label{num_evol} \begin{split} i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\hat{N}_{c_{p(k)}}=&\sqrt{N_{c_{p(k)}}}\sum_{k'=1}^{n}\delta_{k,k'}^p\bigg\{\int\tilde{\Lambda}_{k'}^{\dagger}(\bm{r})\left[i\hbar\frac{\partial\phi_{k'}(\bm{r})}{\partial t}\right]\\ &+\left[i\hbar\frac{\partial\phi_{k'}^*(\bm{r})}{\partial t}\right]\tilde{\Lambda}_{k'}(\bm{r})\,d\bm{r}\bigg\}. \end{split}\] We thus see that \(\langlei\hbar \partial \hat{N}_{c_{p(k)}}/ \partial t\rangle=0\), and so \[i\hbar\frac{d}{dt}N_{c_{p(k)}}=\left<i\hbar\frac{d}{dt}\hat{N}_{c_{p(k)}}\right> =\left<[\hat{N}_{c_{p(k)}},\hat{H}]\right>\] is our equation for the time evolution of the component number. # Zeroth-, first-and second-order approximations to the Hamiltonian {#zero} ## Overview of resulting dynamical equations Following the derivation of the evolution equations for both the fluctuation operators ([\[fluc_evol\]](#fluc_evol){reference-type="ref" reference="fluc_evol"}) and the condensate numbers ([\[num_evol\]](#num_evol){reference-type="ref" reference="num_evol"}), this section will analyse the Hamiltonian ([\[Ham3_1\]](#Ham3_1){reference-type="ref" reference="Ham3_1"}) up to a second-order approximation. This provides, in the first-order approximation, a derivation for the time-dependent Gross--Pitaevskii equations as the sole equations governing the multi-component condensate dynamics (so not capturing any out-of-condensate dynamics). The the second-order approximation provides a derivation for equations governing the out of condensate dynamics---called the modified Bogoliubov--de Gennes equation (together with its complex conjugate), in multi-component form, which are coupled to the multicomponent Gross--Pitaevskii equations. The condensate and non-condensate dynamics yielded by this system of equations are, however, not self-consistent with regard to the particle numbers. We will therefore require a third-order (i.e. full) treatment of the Hamiltonian ([\[Ham3_1\]](#Ham3_1){reference-type="ref" reference="Ham3_1"}). The third-order treatment will be considered in Sec. [6](#there){reference-type="ref" reference="there"}. ## Zeroth order {#zero_1} The lowest order approximation to the cubic Hamiltonian ([\[Ham3_1\]](#Ham3_1){reference-type="ref" reference="Ham3_1"}) is to neglect any terms involving the fluctuation operators. In the zeroth order we then take \(\hat{H}_3\) and neglect any fluctuation terms. This gives the zeroth-order Hamiltonian, which is identical to \(\hat{H}_3^{(N_c^1)}\), but here denoted \(H_0\), where \[\label{Ham0} \begin{split} H_0=&\int\sum_{k=1}^n\Bigg\{N_{c_{p(k)}}\phi_k^*(\bm{r})\left[H_{\text{sp}}^k(\bm{r})+\frac{\tilde{U}_{kk}}{2}|\phi_k(\bm{r})|^2\right]\phi_k(\bm{r}) \\& +\sum_{\substack{j=1\\j< k}}^n\tilde{U}_{jk}\sqrt{\npjN_{c_{p(k)}}}|\phi_j(\bm{r})|^2|\phi_k(\bm{r})|^2 \\& +\sum_{\substack{j=1\\j\neq k}}^nN_{c_{p(k)}}\phi_j^*(\bm{r})H_{\text{ob}}^{jk}(\bm{r})\phi_k(\bm{r})\Bigg\}\,d\bm{r}, \end{split}\] and is purely classical (hence we write \(\hat{H}_0\equiv H_0\)). In terms of a mean-field theory in which the \(n\)-component condensate is assumed to be at absolute zero and with all bosons condensed (i.e. strictly zero noncondensate bosons), the appropriate Hamiltonian \[noting that it is common to scale the condensate mode(s) to be normalised to the number of condensate particles\] is given by this zeroth-order Hamiltonian. Noncondensate particles are not accounted for in this Hamiltonian and our analysis by consequence then proceeds to higher-order approximations. ## First order {#zero_2} To the next order of approximation, a first-order approximation on \(\hat{H}_3\), we consider terms up to linear order in the fluctuation operators. At this level of approximation the appropriate Hamiltonain is given by \(\hat{H}_1=\hat{H}_3^{(N_c^1)}+\hat{H}_3^{(N_c^{1/2})}\). Working with this Hamiltonian and Eq. ([\[lambda_time\]](#lambda_time){reference-type="ref" reference="lambda_time"}) we will obtain Gross--Pitaevskii equations describing the evolution of the condensate modes. Details of the calculations are given in Appendix [\[app_1st\]](#app_1st){reference-type="ref" reference="app_1st"} and we note that the set of time-dependent Gross--Pitaevskii (GP) equations read System ([\[order1\]](#order1){reference-type="ref" reference="order1"}) is the Gross--Pitaevskii equation for condensate part \(\phi_k\), with an associated nonlinear eigenvalue \(\lambda_0^{p(k)}\) that has the appearance of a chemical potential. Note that an identical set of equations would result from the zeroth-order Hamiltonian \(H_0\) ([\[Ham0\]](#Ham0){reference-type="ref" reference="Ham0"}). There are then \(n\) Gross--Pitaevskii equations (one for each condensate part) and the number of distinct nonlinear eigenvalues depends on the number \(l\) of subsets of \(\mathsf{\hat{\Psi}}\). Note that these \(\lambda_0^{p(k)}\) are real. However, whilst this system of equations is often used as the lowest order representation of the multi-component condensate, it does not capture any of the non-condensate dynamics (in fact one can show, see for details, that to this order there is no time-dependence on the non-condensate components). We are thus required to go to higher-order approximations. ## Second order {#zero_3} As a second-order approximation to the cubic Hamiltonian \(\hat{H}_3\), we keep terms up to and including those quadratic in the fluctuation operators. In the same vein to the first-order calculations above, we can use the second-order approximation to ([\[fluc_evol\]](#fluc_evol){reference-type="ref" reference="fluc_evol"}), which means we should calculate \[\begin{gathered} \label{sub} i\hbar\frac{d\tilde{\Lambda}_k(\bm{r})}{dt}=[\tilde{\Lambda}_k(\bm{r}),\hat{H}_2]+\sum_{k'=1}^n\Bigg(-\sqrt{N_{c_{p(k)}}}\\ \begin{split} &\times\int Q_{kk'}(\bm{r},\bm{r}')\left[i\hbar\frac{\partial\phi_{k'}(\bm{r}')}{\partial t}\right]\,d\bm{r}'\\ &+\delta_{k,k'}^p\Bigg\{-\phi_k(\bm{r})\int\left[i\hbar\frac{\partial\phi_{k'}^*(\bm{r}')}{\partial t}\right]\tilde{\Lambda}_{k'}(\bm{r}')\,d\bm{r}'\\ &+\tilde{\Lambda}_k(\bm{r})\int\left[i\hbar\frac{\partial\phi_{k'}(\bm{r}')}{\partial t}\right]\phi_{k'}^*(\bm{r}')\,d\bm{r}'\Bigg\}\Bigg). \end{split} \end{gathered}\] As before it is relatively straightforward to obtain the expression for the commutator \([\tilde{\Lambda}_k(\bm{r}),\hat{H}_2]\): using ([\[fluccomzero\]](#fluccomzero){reference-type="ref" reference="fluccomzero"}) the terms linear and quadratic in the fluctuation operators can be dealt with as previously, while the terms cubic in the fluctuation operator reduce to linear form. We do not provide the explicit expression for \(d\tilde{\Lambda}_k(\bm{r})/dt\), instead choosing to skip to the expression that results after having taken the expectation value of ([\[sub\]](#sub){reference-type="ref" reference="sub"}). We are then left with the same GP equations of ([\[gp_1\]](#gp_1){reference-type="ref" reference="gp_1"}) and associated nonlinear eigenvalues ([\[cp_1\]](#cp_1){reference-type="ref" reference="cp_1"}). We can use this fact to substitute the GP equations ([\[gp_1\]](#gp_1){reference-type="ref" reference="gp_1"}) into the right-hand side of ([\[sub\]](#sub){reference-type="ref" reference="sub"}). Doing this, we get \[\begin{gathered} \label{mbdg} i\hbar\frac{d\tilde{\Lambda}_k(\bm{r})}{dt}=\Bigg[H_{\text{sp}}^k(\bm{r})+\tilde{U}_{kk}|\phi_k(\bm{r})|^2+\sum_{\substack{j=1\\j\neq k}}^n\tilde{U}_{jk}\sqrt{\frac{N_{c_{p(j)}}}{N_{c_{p(k)}}}}|\phi_{j}(\bm{r})|^2\\ \begin{split} &-\lambda_0^{p(k)}\Bigg]\tilde{\Lambda}_k(\bm{r})+\sum_{\substack{j=1\\j\neq k}}^n H_{\text{ob}}^{kj}(\bm{r})\tilde{\Lambda}_j(\bm{r})\\ &+\int\sum_{k'=1}^n Q_{kk'}(\bm{r},\bm{r}')\Bigg\{\tilde{U}_{k'k'}\left[\phi_{k'}^*(\bm{r}')\tilde{\Lambda}_{k'}(\bm{r}')+\text{H.c.}\right]\\ &+\sum_{\substack{j=1\\j\neq k'}}^n\tilde{U}_{jk'}\left[\phi_j^*(\bm{r}')\tilde{\Lambda}_{j}(\bm{r}')+\text{H.c.}\right]\Bigg\}\phi_{k'}(\bm{r}')\,d\bm{r}'. \end{split} \end{gathered}\] This and its Hermitian conjugate form the modified Bogoliubov--de Gennes (MBdG) equations. With this, we can calculate the evolution of the noncondensate parts: we note that, from ([\[n_app\]](#n_app){reference-type="ref" reference="n_app"}), \(N_{c_{p(k)}}=N-\int\sum_{k'=1}^{n}\langle\tilde{\Lambda}^{\dagger}_{k'}(\bm{r})\tilde{\Lambda}_{k'}(\bm{r})\rangle\delta_{k,k'}^p\,d\bm{r}\), so that \[\label{cond_mod} \begin{split} i\hbar\frac{dN_{c_{p(k)}}}{dt}=&\int\sum_{k'=1}^{n} \delta_{k,k'}^p\Bigg\{\tilde{U}_{k'k'}\left[\phi_{k'}^{*^2}(\bm{r})\left<\tilde{\Lambda}_{k'}^2(\bm{r})\right>-\text{H.c.}\right]\\ &+\sum_{\substack{j=1\\j\neq k'}}^n\tilde{U}_{jk'}\bigg[\phi_{j}^*(\bm{r})\phi_{k'}^*(\bm{r})\left<\tilde{\Lambda}_j(\bm{r})\tilde{\Lambda}_{k'}(\bm{r})\right>-\text{H.c.}\bigg]\Bigg\}\,d\bm{r}, \end{split}\] where we have used the modified Bogoliubov--de Gennes equations from above. Our second-order system thus comprises the Gross--Pitaevskii equations ([\[gp_1\]](#gp_1){reference-type="ref" reference="gp_1"}) with associated nonlinear eigenvalues ([\[cp_1\]](#cp_1){reference-type="ref" reference="cp_1"}) together with the modified Bogoliubov--de Gennes equations ([\[mbdg\]](#mbdg){reference-type="ref" reference="mbdg"}). There are two key issues, however, that one must highlight before proceeding. The first is the appearance of terms quadratic in the fluctuation operators in the evolution of the condensate number of ([\[cond_mod\]](#cond_mod){reference-type="ref" reference="cond_mod"}), which we have, up to now, consistently neglected when dealing with the second-order Hamiltonian. This "inconsistency" \[if we are to retain ([\[cond_mod\]](#cond_mod){reference-type="ref" reference="cond_mod"})\] leads us to the second key issue, which is the possibility, in an out-of-equilibrium evolution, for unconstrained growth of the non-condensate part without there being any corresponding effect on the condensate evolution. This unconstrained growth is a result of the one-way condensate and noncondensate part dynamics involved in the coupled system of the Gross--Pitaevskii equations ([\[gp_1\]](#gp_1){reference-type="ref" reference="gp_1"}) and the modified Bogoliubov--de Gennes equations ([\[mbdg\]](#mbdg){reference-type="ref" reference="mbdg"}): the Gross--Pitaevskii equations (derived through a first-order treatment of the effective Hamiltonian), which evolve the condensate parts, explicitly contain only condensate part terms, whereas the modified Bogoliubov--de Gennes equations (derived through a second-order treatment of the effective Hamiltonian), which evolve the noncondensate parts, contain both condensate and noncondensate parts. This allows for an unconstrained growth in the noncondensate part terms through evolution of the modified Bogoliubov--de Gennes equations without any corresponding effect on the condensate parts in the Gross--Pitaevskii equations (see for more details concerning unconstrained growth in a single component condensate). We are thus left with a non-self-consistent set of dynamical equations. To what extent this system can be considered appropriate depends very much on the actual dynamical configuration. Irrespective, a treatment of the cubic Hamiltonian ([\[Ham3_1\]](#Ham3_1){reference-type="ref" reference="Ham3_1"}) will enable us to form a self-consistent set of dynamical equations for the condensate and non-condensate parts. # Second-order equations of motion {#there} In light of the inconsistent nature of the first-order approximation to the dynamical equations resulting from a second-order Hamiltonian, we proceed with a third-order approximation to the Hamiltonian. This is the highest order that we will be required to go to in order to achieve a self-consistent set of dynamical equations for the condensate and noncondensate parts: we will find that the equation governing the condensate parts \[the Gross--Pitaevskii equation in a first-and second-order treatment, ([\[gp_1\]](#gp_1){reference-type="ref" reference="gp_1"}), with only condensate part dependence\] is, in this third-order treatment, generalised to be dependent on both the condensate and noncondensate parts. This higher-order Gross--Pitaevskii equation we refer to as the generalised Gross--Pitaevskii (GGP) equation. It will be shown to be coupled, in a self-consistent manner, to the modified Bogoliubov--de Gennes equations of ([\[mbdg\]](#mbdg){reference-type="ref" reference="mbdg"}), which in the third-order treatment remain unchanged. To a third-order approximation, the effective Hamiltonian has already been written down, and referred to as the cubic Hamiltonian \(\hat{H}_3\), in ([\[Ham3_1\]](#Ham3_1){reference-type="ref" reference="Ham3_1"}). In dealing with the cubic Hamiltonian, we must use the full form of ([\[fluc_evol\]](#fluc_evol){reference-type="ref" reference="fluc_evol"}), which means that we need to consider \[\begin{split} i\hbar\frac{d\tilde{\Lambda}_k(\bm{r})}{dt}=&[\tilde{\Lambda}_k(\bm{r}),\hat{H}_3]+\sum_{k'=1}^n\Bigg(-\sqrt{N_{c_{p(k)}}}\\ &\times\int Q_{kk'}(\bm{r},\bm{r}')\left[i\hbar\frac{\partial\phi_{k'}(\bm{r}')}{\partial t}\right]\,d\bm{r}'\\ &+\delta_{k,k'}^p\Bigg\{-\phi_k(\bm{r})\int\left[i\hbar\frac{\partial\phi_{k'}^*(\bm{r}')}{\partial t}\right]\\ &\times\tilde{\Lambda}_{k'}(\bm{r}')\,d\bm{r}'+\tilde{\Lambda}_k(\bm{r})\int\left[i\hbar\frac{\partial\phi_{k'}(\bm{r}')}{\partial t}\right]\\ &\times\phi_{k'}^*(\bm{r}')\,d\bm{r}'+\frac{1}{\sqrt{N_{c_{p(k)}}}}\int\left[i\hbar\frac{\partial\phi_{k'}(\bm{r}')}{\partial t}\right]\\ &\times\left<\tilde{\Lambda}^{\dagger}_{k'}(\bm{r}')\tilde{\Lambda}_{k}(\bm{r})\right>\,d\bm{r}'\Bigg\}\Bigg). \label{H3} \end{split}\] As explicitly written down in the cubic Hamiltonian ([\[Ham3_1\]](#Ham3_1){reference-type="ref" reference="Ham3_1"}) and in the above equation, we now consider terms of order \(\mathcal{O}(N_c^{-1/2})\). Calculation of \([\tilde{\Lambda}_k(\bm{r}),\hat{H}_3]\) is only slightly more involved than before: the only additional terms that result from use of the cubic, rather than second-order Hamiltonian, are all of order \(\mathcal{O}(\tilde{\Lambda}/N_c^{1/2})\), i.e. they are linear in the fluctuation operators which makes calculation of the commutator rather straightforward. The analysis on ([\[H3\]](#H3){reference-type="ref" reference="H3"}) becomes fairly cumbersome, although straightforward, and so we do not quote it in its entirety in the main text. Instead we will skip to the resultant expression: this is obtained by taking the expectation value of ([\[H3\]](#H3){reference-type="ref" reference="H3"}) and inserting the Gross--Pitaevskii equation ([\[gp_1\]](#gp_1){reference-type="ref" reference="gp_1"}) on the fourth and fifth lines of ([\[H3\]](#H3){reference-type="ref" reference="H3"}). After some calculation we arrive eventually to an equation for the evolution of the condensate parts, named the generalised Gross--Pitaevskii (GGP) equation: This GP equation and associated nonlinear eigenvalue are identical to (57) and (58) of. Note that this system is the commonly used GP equation applied to a single component condensate when in the zero-temperature limit. To the next order, the resulting dynamical equations of motion are the MBdG equations ([\[mbdg\]](#mbdg){reference-type="ref" reference="mbdg"}) \[\begin{gathered} \label{mbdg_ex_1_1} i\hbar\frac{d\tilde{\Lambda}_1(\bm{r})}{dt}=\left[H_{\text{sp}}^1(\bm{r})+\tilde{U}_{11}|\phi_1(\bm{r})|^2-\lambda_0^1\right]\tilde{\Lambda}_1(\bm{r})\\ +\int Q_{11}(\bm{r},\bm{r}')\tilde{U}_{11}\bigg[\phi_{1}^*(\bm{r}')\tilde{\Lambda}_1(\bm{r}')+\text{H.c.}\bigg]\phi_{1}(\bm{r}')\,d\bm{r}', \end{gathered}\] coupled to the above GP equation ([\[order1_ex_1\_1\]](#order1_ex_1_1){reference-type="ref" reference="order1_ex_1_1"}). Finally, the second order (consistent) dynamical equations of motion couple this MBdG equation ([\[mbdg_ex_1\_1\]](#mbdg_ex_1_1){reference-type="ref" reference="mbdg_ex_1_1"}) to the GGP equation ([\[ggp\]](#ggp){reference-type="ref" reference="ggp"}), written for \(n=1\) as This system of the GGP equation, MBdG equation and associated nonlinear eigenvalue is identical to (75), (63) and (73) respectively of. ## Two-component condensates ### Possible cases for two-component condensates Two-component condensates have been frequently realised in experiment (for example ). They provide rich systems in which many different ground and excited states can exist, and have the potential to offer insights into instabilities and the transition to turbulence in quantum systems. In all possible cases, we have \(n=2\) with \(C=2\); i.e. either the two components are mutually coherent or they are incoherent. The three experimental realisations of two-component condensates that we have quoted above contain the three possible combinations of components, although from our formal point of view there are only two distinct cases. The first, Ref., has realised a \(^{87}\)Rb condensate where the only difference between the two components is their internal spin state; the second, Ref., has realised a condensate with two isotopes (\(^{85}\)Rb and \(^{87}\)Rb) of the same atom, and the third, Ref., has realised a condensate with different atoms, \(^{87}\)Rb and \(^{133}\)Cs. Of these three experimental examples, the first one has coherent components, whereas the last two have incoherent components. When we consider each of these two cases in the following subsections, we will expand all summation terms for explicitness. ### Mutually coherent components In the case when the two-components are mutually coherent, we have \(l=1\) with \(|p_1|=2\). In what follows in this section we define \(p(1)=p(2)\equiv 1\) so that \(N_{c_{p(k)}}\equiv N_{c_1}\) and the lowest-order equations of motion are the coupled GP equations ([\[order1\]](#order1){reference-type="ref" reference="order1"}), which read where \(k=1\), \(2\). where, as in the previous section, \(k=1\), \(2\). System ([\[order1_ex_2\_2\]](#order1_ex_2_2){reference-type="ref" reference="order1_ex_2_2"}) describes a mutually incoherent two-component condensate in the thermodynamic limit at zero temperature. There have been extensive studies regarding this system in recent literature (see for example the review of and a study on the ground and excited states in as well as ). To next order we have the MBdG equations ([\[mbdg\]](#mbdg){reference-type="ref" reference="mbdg"}), that read coupled to the above GP equations ([\[order1_ex_3\_2\]](#order1_ex_3_2){reference-type="ref" reference="order1_ex_3_2"}). Finally, our second order (consistent) dynamical equations of motion for the three-component condensate are given by these MBdG equations ([\[order23_ex_3\_2b\]](#order23_ex_3_2b){reference-type="ref" reference="order23_ex_3_2b"}) coupled to the GGP equation ([\[ggp\]](#ggp){reference-type="ref" reference="ggp"}): ::: where the nonlinear eigenvalues \(\lambda_{2}^{1}\) and \(\lambda_{2}^{2}\) follow from ([\[lam222\]](#lam222){reference-type="ref" reference="lam222"}). # Conclusions {#concs} We have extended the number-conserving formalism developed for single-component Bose--Einstein condensed systems in to general multi-component configurations. In the number-conserving approach, the system of equations are derived from approximations to the governing Hamiltonian, written generally to encompass any number of components, in a wide variety of mutually coherent and incoherent configurations. Differing levels of approximation in the Hamiltonian generate dynamics described by multi-component equivalents to the Gross--Piteavskii equation, the number-conserving modified Bogoliubov--de Gennes equations ([\[mbdg\]](#mbdg){reference-type="ref" reference="mbdg"}) coupled to the Gross--Pitaevskii equation, and the generalised Gross--Pitaevskii equation ([\[ggp\]](#ggp){reference-type="ref" reference="ggp"}) coupled to the modified Bolgoliubov--de Gennes equations. The last of these yields self-consistent equations of motion with regard to the condensate and non-condensate number. We have looked specifically at two-component condensates, both where the components are mutually coherent (two internal states of the same atom), and where they are mutually incoherent (most obviously two completely different atomic species), and at a three-component configuration where two of the components are mutually coherent with respect to each other, but not with respect to a third component (e.g., two internal states of one species of atom, and another species of atom, all within the same experimental setup). This provides the essential framework for detailed study of specific multi-component condensate configurations, within a canonical, or number-conserving, formalism.

{'timestamp': '2014-04-08T02:12:44', 'yymm': '1401', 'arxiv_id': '1401.5661', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5661'}

# Introduction {#sec:intro} The origin of the flavour structure of the fermion masses and mixing in the standard model (SM) remains one of the unsolved puzzles in particle physics. Several approaches to this problem have been put forward, most of them based on the use of discrete  or continuous  flavour symmetries. In particular, mainly motivated by the measurement of several neutrino oscillation parameters, the use of discrete symmetries has recently become more popular (for recent reviews, see e.g. Refs. ). In flavour model building, one commonly chooses a flavour symmetry group \(K\) and then studies how fermion masses and mixing are constrained by this symmetry. Because of the SM gauge symmetry there is, of course, an additional global hypercharge symmetry \(U(1)_Y\) in the Lagrangian. Thus, in such studies it is important to distinguish the chosen flavour group \(K\) from the full flavour group, denoted henceforth by \(G=K\times U(1)_Y\). After spontaneous symmetry breaking (SSB) the vacuum expectation values (vevs) of the Higgs fields break completely, in many instances, \(K\) and \(G\), leaving no residual flavour symmetry in the model. But, in some rather interesting cases, the vevs could fully break \(K\) but not \(G\), and thus some residual symmetry remains. Clearly, any accidental symmetry of the Lagrangian, such as \(U(1)_B\), corresponding to baryon number, is not relevant for the analysis of the flavour sector neither any residual symmetry of \(G\) which is contained in it. In the literature, there are studies focusing on symmetry groups exclusively applied to the Higgs sector, either with two  or more than two doublets , as well as studies focusing either on flavour symmetry groups acting in the fermion sector with assumed vev alignments  or on the residual symmetries remaining on the fermion mass matrices . Our aim is to provide a contribution towards the connection of all these subjects. In particular, we shall study in a systematic fashion the impact of a chosen flavour group on the Higgs potential and its vevs, on the Yukawa coupling matrices and thus on the residual physical properties of the mass matrices and the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) quark mixing matrix. The introduction of additional scalars is a common feature to all flavour models, which brings with it a large number of possible model implementations for a given flavour group. Studying all these implementations, even for two or three Higgs doublet models, is not an easy task, specially for large flavour groups. We shall show that most of the unphysical scenarios can be identified just by analysing how scalars transform under the flavour group and how they break it. Through this analysis we shall prove that under very general conditions some choices of flavour groups are excluded for a given scalar content. Although we shall restrict our discussion to the quark sector of the theory, the results presented here can be easily extended to the lepton sector. The paper is organised as follows. In Sect. [2](#sec:theorem){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:theorem"}, after briefly reviewing our notation and the experimental input, we analyse the invariance of the Yukawa coupling matrices under a full flavour group. Then we proceed to the formulation of a theorem which improves that in Ref. , by including also the constraints arising from the right-handed quark sector. A summary of the possible CKM mixing patterns and quark spectra is presented, according to the existence or not of a residual symmetry in the whole quark sector. Most importantly, by introducing the notion of pseudo-invariance of the vev under all subgroups of the flavour group, we address for the first time the problem of knowing whether such a residual symmetry is possible or not. This issue has not been addressed before in the literature, and is explained in detail in Sect. [3](#sec:examples){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:examples"}, where we illustrate the technique by applying it to the flavour groups \(\Delta(27)\), \(A_4\) and \(S_3\), commonly found in the literature to explain fermion masses and mixing. Finally, our concluding remarks are given in Sect. [4](#sec:conclusions){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:conclusions"}. # A no-go theorem for models with \(N\) Higgs doublets {#sec:theorem} ## Notation and experimental input Let us consider a model with \(N\) Higgs doublets, \(\phi_k\), and three generations of left-handed quark doublets, \(Q_L = (u_L, d_L)^T\), right-handed up-type quark singlets, \(u_R\), and right-handed down-type quark singlets, \(d_R\). The Yukawa Lagrangian is \[-{\cal L}_Y = \bar{Q}_L\, \Gamma_k\, \phi_k\, d_R + \bar{Q}_L\, \Delta_k\, \tilde{\phi}_k\, u_R + \textrm{H.c.}, \label{LY_before}\] where a sum over the Higgs fields (\(k=1 \ldots N\)) is implicit, \(\Gamma_k\) and \(\Delta_k\) are \(3 \times 3\) matrices in the down-and up-type quark family space, respectively. The scalar fields can be combined into \(\Phi = (\phi_1,\,\phi_2,\,\ldots,\,\phi_N)^T\). After the SSB, the scalars acquire vevs, \(\langle \Phi \rangle = (v_1, \, v_2, \, \ldots, \, v_N)^T\), and the Yukawa Lagrangian contains the terms \[\begin{aligned} -\langle {\cal L}_Y \rangle &= &\left( \bar{u}_L, \bar{d}_L \right)\, M_d\, \left( \begin{array}{c} 0\\ 1 \end{array} \right)\, d_R \nonumber\\ & &+\left( \bar{u}_L, \bar{d}_L \right)\, M_u\, \left( \begin{array}{c} 1\\ 0 \end{array} \right)\, u_R + \textrm{H.c.}, \label{LY_after} \end{aligned}\] where \[M_d = \Gamma_k\, v_k,\quad M_u = \Delta_k\, v_k^\ast, \label{MuMd_def}\] are the down-quark and up-quark mass matrices. Using transformations that keep the \(SU(2)_L\) doublet structure \(\bar{Q}_L = \left( \bar{u}_L, \bar{d}_L \right)\), it is possible to diagonalise \(M_d\) or \(M_u\), but not both matrices. We denote by "left space", the space of vectors \(\bar{Q}_L\), which has three components in family space, one for each generation of quarks. So, \(M_d\) and \(M_u\) cannot be simultaneously diagonalised with left space transformations. To diagonalise them, we must treat \(u_L\) and \(d_L\) differently. Indeed, one can always find matrices \(V_{uL}\), \(V_{uR}\), \(V_{dL}\), \(V_{dR}\), such that \[\begin{aligned} V_{dL}^\dagger\, M_d\, V_{dR} &=& D_d = \textrm{diag}\,(m_d, m_s, m_b), \nonumber\\ V_{uL}^\dagger\, M_u\, V_{uR} &=& D_u = \textrm{diag}\,(m_u, m_c, m_t). \label{MdMu_diag} \end{aligned}\] Often, it is convenient to work with the Hermitian matrices \[H_d = M_d\, M_d^\dagger\,, \quad H_u = M_u\, M_u^\dagger\,, \label{HdHu_def}\] which live on the left space only and remain invariant under unitary redefinitions of \(u_R\) and/or \(d_R\). Using Eqs. [\[MdMu_diag\]](#MdMu_diag){reference-type="eqref" reference="MdMu_diag"} and [\[HdHu_def\]](#HdHu_def){reference-type="eqref" reference="HdHu_def"}, we find \[H_d = V_{dL}\, D_d^2\, V_{dL}^\dagger\,, \quad H_u = V_{uL}\, D_u^2\, V_{uL}^\dagger\.\] We know from experiment that the quark masses are non-vanishing and non-degenerate. As a result, the matrices \(H_d\) and \(H_u\) are invertible and have a non-degenerate spectrum. The CKM mixing matrix is given by \[V = V_{uL}^\dagger V_{dL}.\] It is also known from experiment that \(V\) must have three non-trivial angles and that the largest contributor to CP violation in the kaon and \(B\) meson systems must be the CKM CP-violating phase, which is proportional to the basis-invariant observable \[J = \textrm{Det} \left( H_d H_u-H_u H_d\right).\] Therefore, \(V\) cannot be block-diagonal or any permutation of a block-diagonal matrix, it cannot be given by the identity or by some permutation matrix, and \(J\) must differ from zero. ## Yukawa coupling invariance under a full flavour group \(G\) {#subsec:group} Let us consider a group \(G\) with group elements \(g\). The group can be defined by a set of generators \(i\). For example, we may have two generators, \(a\) and \(b\), such that all group elements are obtained by successive products of \(a\) and \(b\). Then one chooses how the various fields transform under the group \(G\). This means that for three quark generations one chooses \(3 \times 3\) matrices representing this group, so that the quark fields transform under the generators of the group as \[\begin{aligned} Q^G_{L\alpha}= \left(\mathcal{G}_{Li}\right)_{\alpha\beta}Q_{L\beta}\,, \nonumber\\ d^G_{R\alpha}= \left(\mathcal{G}^{d}_{Ri}\right)_{\alpha\beta}d_{R\beta}\,,\\ u^G_{R\alpha}= \left(\mathcal{G}^{u}_{Ri}\right)_{\alpha\beta}u_{R\beta}\,,\nonumber \label{q_G} \end{aligned}\] where the index \(i\) runs from \(1\) to the number of group generators. Similarly, one chooses \(N \times N\) matrices, such that the scalar fields transform as \[\Phi^G_{k}= \left(\mathcal{G}_{i}\right)_{kl}\Phi_{l}\. \label{phi_G}\] These equations hold for matrices \(\mathcal{G}_i\) representing the generators as well as for matrices representing any element of the group, i.e. \(\mathcal{G}_g\). The explicit form of \(\mathcal{G}_{Li}\), \(\mathcal{G}^{u}_{Ri}\), \(\mathcal{G}^{d}_{Ri}\) and \(\mathcal{G}_{i}\) dictates which representations \(D(Q_L)\), \(D(u_R)\), \(D(d_R)\) and \(D(\Phi)\), respectively, we have chosen for the fields. We now ask the Yukawa Lagrangian to be invariant under this group before SSB. Using Eq. [\[LY_before\]](#LY_before){reference-type="eqref" reference="LY_before"}, this implies the following relations for the couplings: \[\begin{aligned} \mathcal{G}_{Lg}^\dagger \, \Gamma^k\,\mathcal{G}_{Rg}^d \, \left(\mathcal{G}_g\right)_{kl} = \Gamma^l\,, \nonumber\\ \mathcal{G}_{Lg}^\dagger \, \Delta^k\,\mathcal{G}_{Rg}^u \, \left(\mathcal{G}_g^\ast \right)_{kl} = \Delta^l\,, \label{inv} \end{aligned}\] for all group elements \(g\). Equation [\[inv\]](#inv){reference-type="eqref" reference="inv"} is clearly valid for the identity element \(g=e\). It is also valid for an element \(g\) such that \(\mathcal{G}_{Lg}=\mathcal{G}_{Rg}=e^{i\theta}\mathbbm{1}\) and \(\mathcal{G}_g=\mathbbm{1}\). The latter relations are obviously always verified since baryon number is conserved at or below the electroweak scale. We call such an element a trivial group element, the group it generates (\(G_g\)) a trivial group, and we denote this case by \(G_g\subseteq U(1)_B\). To decide what invariance may remain in the Yukawa Lagrangian after SSB (and, therefore, in the mass matrices), we must know how the vacuum transforms under the group elements. The ensuing analysis may not be straightforward, so we will start with a simple case, and generalise it in steps. For the moment, we make three simplifying assumptions: - we ignore the up-type quarks; - we assume that \(\Phi\) is in an irreducible representation (irrep) of \(G\); - we assume that there is a non-trivial group element, \(g_1\), leaving the vacuum invariant. Given assumption (ii), we conclude that either no scalar couples to the down-type quarks (which would lead to massless quarks) or else all scalars couple to down-type quarks. This conclusion is a particular case of the following more general assertion: **Proposition** *For the down-type Yukawa terms in Eq. [\[LY_before\]](#LY_before){reference-type="eqref" reference="LY_before"}, each set of Higgs doublets \(\phi_k\), comprising an irreducible representation of \(G\), either couples to quark fields with linearly independent \(\Gamma^k\), or decouples completely with \(\Gamma^k=0\).* The same proposition holds for the up-type Yukawa terms and their coefficients \(\Delta^k\). The proof is given in [\[app:proof\]](#app:proof){reference-type="ref" reference="app:proof"}; its essential idea is that if some \(\Gamma^k\) were linearly dependent, then one would be able to identify doublets which do not couple to the down-quark fields and represent an invariant subspace under the action of \(G\), this making the representation reducible. Thus, no matrix \(\Gamma^k\) vanishes and \[\left( \mathcal{G}_{g_1} \right)_{kl}\, v_l = v_k, \label{sym_vac}\] for some given group element \(g_1\). The set of all elements \(g_1\) satisfying Eq. [\[sym_vac\]](#sym_vac){reference-type="eqref" reference="sym_vac"} forms a subgroup of \(G\), which we denote by \(G_q\). The Lagrangian after SSB is thus left invariant by a residual symmetry \(G_q\). Then, specializing in Eq. [\[inv\]](#inv){reference-type="eqref" reference="inv"} to an element \(g=g_1\) in \(G_q\), and using Eqs. [\[MuMd_def\]](#MuMd_def){reference-type="eqref" reference="MuMd_def"} and [\[sym_vac\]](#sym_vac){reference-type="eqref" reference="sym_vac"}, one gets \[\mathcal{G}_{L{g_1}}^\dagger M_d\ \mathcal{G}_{R{g_1}}^d=M_d\. \label{symMd}\] Under these assumptions, \(M_d\) is symmetric under the group element \(g_1\) and the subgroup generated by it. If assumption (ii) remains valid but we substitute (iii) by the assumption that the element \(g \in U(1)_B\) is trivial (in the newly defined sense), then we conclude that \(M_d\) has no symmetry, i.e., the group \(G\) has been completely broken by the vacuum. In this case, we call the residual symmetry trivial, i.e. \(G_q\subseteq U(1)_B\). We now turn to the possibility that \(\Phi\) is in a reducible representation of \(G\), thus negating our assumption (ii). First we assume that \(\Phi\) breaks into the three vectors \[\label{reducible} \left(\phi_1, \ldots, \phi_r \right), \ \ \ \left(\phi_{r+1}, \ldots, \phi_s \right), \ \ \ \left(\phi_{s+1}, \ldots, \phi_N \right),\] which transform as the irreducible representations \(\varphi_1\), \(\varphi_2\), and \(\varphi_3\) of \(G\), respectively. We can still write Eq. [\[inv\]](#inv){reference-type="eqref" reference="inv"}. The only novelty is that \(\mathcal{G}_g\) is now a block-diagonal matrix, with one \(r \times r\) block, one \((s-r) \times (s-r)\) block, and one \((N-s) \times (N-s)\) block. Said otherwise, we may write \[\begin{aligned} \mathcal{G}_{Lg}^\dagger \, \Gamma^k_{\varphi_1}\, \mathcal{G}_{Rg}^d \, \left( \mathcal{G}_g^{\varphi_1} \right)_{kl} &=& \Gamma^l_{\varphi_1}, \ \ k,l = 1 \dots r, \label{sym_G_vp1} \\ \mathcal{G}_{Lg}^\dagger \, \Gamma^k_{\varphi_2}\, \mathcal{G}_{Rg}^d \, \left( \mathcal{G}_g^{\varphi_2} \right)_{kl} &=& \Gamma^l_{\varphi_2}, \ \ k,l = r+1 \dots s, \label{sym_G_vp2} \\ \mathcal{G}_{Lg}^\dagger \, \Gamma^k_{\varphi_3}\, \mathcal{G}_{Rg}^d \, \left( \mathcal{G}_g^{\varphi_3} \right)_{kl} &=& \Gamma^l_{\varphi_3}, \ \ k,l = s+1 \dots N, \label{sym_G_vp3} \end{aligned}\] where we introduce a label \(\varphi_j\) denoting the representation. We assume that the \(\varphi_3\) representation is such that the fields \(\left(\phi_{s+1}, \ldots, \phi_N \right)\) do not couple to the down-type quarks, i.e., \(\Gamma^k_{\varphi_3} = 0\). In this case, \[\begin{aligned} M_d = \sum_{k=1}^N \Gamma^k v_k = \sum_{k=1}^r \Gamma^k_{\varphi_1} v_k^{\varphi_1} + \sum_{k=r+1}^s \Gamma^k_{\varphi_2} v_k^{\varphi_2}. \label{Md_vp1_vp2} \end{aligned}\] We further assume that the vevs of \(\left(\phi_{1}, \ldots, \phi_r \right)\) and \(\left(\phi_{r+1}, \ldots, \phi_s \right)\) are invariant under some subgroups \(G_1\) and \(G_2\), respectively. Thus, \[\left(\mathcal{G}_{g_1}\right)_{kl}\, v_l^{\varphi_1} = v_k^{\varphi_1}, \quad \left(\mathcal{G}_{g_2}\right)_{kl}\, v_l^{\varphi_2} = v_k^{\varphi_2}, \label{sym_vac_vp2}\] for \(g_1\in G_1\) and \(g_2 \in G_2\). The common residual symmetry is now \(G_q=G_1\cap G_2\). If \(G_q\subseteq U(1)_B\), then the residual symmetry is trivial. In contrast, if we have a non-trivial \(G_q\not\subseteq U(1)_B\), we can pick \(g\in G_q\) and using Eqs. [\[sym_G\_vp1\]](#sym_G_vp1){reference-type="eqref" reference="sym_G_vp1"} and [\[sym_G\_vp2\]](#sym_G_vp2){reference-type="eqref" reference="sym_G_vp2"}, together with Eqs. [\[Md_vp1_vp2\]](#Md_vp1_vp2){reference-type="eqref" reference="Md_vp1_vp2"} and [\[sym_vac_vp2\]](#sym_vac_vp2){reference-type="eqref" reference="sym_vac_vp2"}, we obtain again Eq. [\[symMd\]](#symMd){reference-type="eqref" reference="symMd"}. Notice that, in this example, \(\varphi_3\) is irrelevant for \(M_d\) but it may matter for \(M_u\), should \(\left(\phi_{s+1}, \ldots, \phi_N \right)\) couple to the up-type quarks. We are now ready to generalise the impact of symmetries and to include the up-quark sector. The residual symmetry \(G_q\) restricted to the down-quark sector is now renamed \(G_d\), while \(G_q\) is reserved for the residual symmetry of the quark sector as a whole. If \(\Phi\) is in a reducible representation of \(G\), it may be seen as a sum of irreducible representations \(\varphi_i\) as \[\Phi = \varphi_1 \oplus \varphi_2 \oplus \cdots \oplus \varphi_m \quad \textrm{with} \quad m \leq N. \label{Phi_decomp}\] Equation [\[inv\]](#inv){reference-type="eqref" reference="inv"} can now be written as a set of equations for each \(\varphi_j\), \[\begin{aligned} \mathcal{G}_{L{g}}^\dagger \, \Gamma^k_{\varphi_j}\,\mathcal{G}_{R{g}}^d \, \left( \mathcal{G}^{\varphi_j}_{g} \right)_{kl} = \Gamma^l_{\varphi_j}\,, \nonumber\\ \mathcal{G}_{L{g}}^\dagger \, \Delta^k_{\varphi_j}\,\mathcal{G}_{R{g}}^u \, \left( \mathcal{G}_{g}^{\varphi_j} \right)^\ast _{kl} = \Delta^l_{\varphi_j}\,, \label{inv2} \end{aligned}\] where no sum is assumed in \(\varphi_j\). The matrices \(\Gamma^k_{\varphi_j}\) and \(\Delta^k_{\varphi_j}\) denote the couplings associated with \(\phi_k\) for a given irreducible representation \(\varphi_j\). For example, if \(\Phi\) is an irreducible quadruplet \((\phi_1,\phi_2,\phi_3,\phi_4)\) then \(\Gamma^k\), for \(k=1 \dots 4\), denotes the Yukawa coupling associated with each entry of the scalar representation. If \(\Phi\) is a reducible quadruplet, composed by two irreducible doublets \(\varphi_1 = (\phi_1,\phi_2)\) and \(\varphi_2 = (\phi_3,\phi_4)\), then the coupling \(\Gamma_{\varphi_i}^k\) associates two couplings to each irreducible representation, i.e. \(k=1,2\). One denotes the vev of the irreducible representations \(\varphi_j\) as \(v^{\varphi_j}\). When the vev breaks the group \(G\), the Lagrangian may still remain invariant under the action of some elements of \(G\). Let us denote by \(G_d\) and \(G_u\) the subgroups of \(G\) that are left invariant by the vevs of all Higgs fields coupling to down-type and up-type quarks, respectively. Some fields may interact with both sectors. The relevant residual symmetry of the quark sector is \(G_q=G_d\cap G_u\). The fields that do not couple to quarks are irrelevant to our discussion. There are several possibilities: 1. If \(G_q\subseteq U(1)_B\), there is no non-trivial symmetry left in the quark sector as a whole. More specifically, 1. If \(G_{d,u} \subseteq U(1)_B\), then there is no non-trivial symmetry left in either (up-or down-) quark sector; 2. If \(G_d \not\subseteq U(1)_B\) and \(G_u\subseteq U(1)_B\), then there is some non-trivial symmetry left in \(M_d\), but not in \(M_u\); 3. If \(G_d \subseteq U(1)_B\) and \(G_u \not\subseteq U(1)_B\), then there is some non-trivial symmetry left in \(M_u\), but not in \(M_d\); 4. If \(G_d \not\subseteq U(1)_B\) and \(G_u \not\subseteq U(1)_B\), then there is some non-trivial symmetry left in \(M_d\), some non-trivial symmetry left in \(M_u\), but there is no non-trivial symmetry left in both \(M_d\) and \(M_u\); 2. If \(G_q\not\subseteq U(1)_B\), then there is some non-trivial symmetry left in the quark sector as a whole. The characteristic in common to the cases in (1) is that \(\langle \Phi \rangle\) breaks the symmetry completely, modulo \(U(1)_B\). In contrast, case (2) leaves a common non-trivial symmetry in the whole quark sector. In the latter case, for \(g \in G_q\), from Eqs. [\[inv2\]](#inv2){reference-type="eqref" reference="inv2"} we find \[\mathcal{G}_{L{g}}^\dagger \, M_d\ \mathcal{G}_{R{g}}^d \, = M_d, \quad \mathcal{G}_{L{g}}^\dagger \, M_u\ \mathcal{G}_{R{g}}^u \, = M_u. \label{inv2MuMd}\] with \(M_d = \Gamma^k_{\varphi_j} v^{\varphi_j}_k\) and \(M_u = \Delta^k_{\varphi_j} v_k^{\varphi_j\, \ast}\). Equation [\[inv2MuMd\]](#inv2MuMd){reference-type="eqref" reference="inv2MuMd"} generalises Eq. [\[symMd\]](#symMd){reference-type="eqref" reference="symMd"} to the case of reducible representations and is the main result of this section. Thus, when using Eq. [\[inv2MuMd\]](#inv2MuMd){reference-type="eqref" reference="inv2MuMd"}, as we will do in the theorem to be proved in the next section, it does not matter whether the representation of the group \(G\) is reducible or irreducible. ## Theorem and proof {#subsec:theorem} Let us consider a model with quarks and scalar fields transforming under some set of representations of a full flavour group \(G\). We denote the representation space where \(G\) acts as the *flavour space*, i.e., the horizontal space of replicated multiplets of quark and scalar fields with the same gauge quantum numbers. The following theorem strongly constrains the viable models. **Theorem** *(No-Go) Given a group \(G\) acting on the flavour space, the only way to obtain a non-block-diagonal CKM mixing matrix and, simultaneously, non-degenerate and non-zero quark masses, is that \(\left<\Phi\right>\) breaks completely the group \(G\), except possibly for some symmetry belonging to baryon number.* *Proof* Suppose that there is a residual symmetry group \(G_q\) which is left invariant by the vev \(\left<\Phi\right>\). Let us denote a generic element of \(G_q\) as \(g_1\), and then Eq. [\[sym_vac\]](#sym_vac){reference-type="eqref" reference="sym_vac"} is assumed.[^1] We want to show that either \(g_1=e\), i.e., the trivial element in \(G\), or \(g_1\) acts on the flavour space as a member of the baryon number symmetry. Equation [\[sym_vac\]](#sym_vac){reference-type="eqref" reference="sym_vac"} implies that the Lagrangian after SSB is invariant under \(g_1\). Using the same rationale that led to Eq. [\[inv2MuMd\]](#inv2MuMd){reference-type="eqref" reference="inv2MuMd"}, we conclude that \[\mathcal{G}_{L{g_1}}^\dagger M_d\ \mathcal{G}_{R{g_1}}^d = M_d\,, \quad \mathcal{G}_{L{g_1}}^\dagger M_u\ \mathcal{G}_{R{g_1}}^u = M_u\. \label{symMuMd}\] Since we shall be interested in the left sector, where the CKM mixing arises, we may turn to the Hermitian combinations in Eq. [\[HdHu_def\]](#HdHu_def){reference-type="eqref" reference="HdHu_def"}, which verify \[\mathcal{G}_{L{g_1}}^\dagger H_d\ \mathcal{G}_{L{g_1}} = H_d\,, \quad \mathcal{G}_{L{g_1}}^\dagger H_u\ \mathcal{G}_{L{g_1}} = H_u\. \label{symHuHd}\] The next step is to use the following result (proved in [\[block.diag\]](#block.diag){reference-type="ref" reference="block.diag"}): if the generator \(\mathcal{G}_{Lg_1}\) given in Eq. [\[symHuHd\]](#symHuHd){reference-type="eqref" reference="symHuHd"} is not proportional to the identity matrix, then the CKM matrix is block-diagonal, in contradiction with experiment. Note that we include any permutation of a block-diagonal matrix, as well as the unit mixing matrix, \(V=\mathbbm{1}\), in the category of block-diagonal matrices. We then conclude that \[\mathcal{G}_{L{g_1}} = e^{i \theta}\, \mathbbm{1}, \label{H_GL_3}\] so that Eqs. [\[symHuHd\]](#symHuHd){reference-type="eqref" reference="symHuHd"} place no restriction on \(H_{d,u}\), and one has a potentially viable CKM matrix. Returning now to Eqs. [\[symMuMd\]](#symMuMd){reference-type="eqref" reference="symMuMd"}, it follows that \[\mathcal{G}_{R{g_1}}^d = \mathcal{G}_{R{g_1}}^u = \mathcal{G}_{L{g_1}}, \label{GR=GL}\] because \(M_u\) and \(M_d\) are invertible. Applying this to Eq. [\[inv\]](#inv){reference-type="eqref" reference="inv"}, we find \[\Gamma^k\, \left( \mathcal{G}_{g_1}-\mathbbm{1}\right)_{kl}=\boldsymbol{0}, \quad \Delta^k\, {\left( \mathcal{G}_{g_1}-\mathbbm{1} \right)^\ast}_{kl}=\boldsymbol{0}, \label{GamDel_g1}\] for \(l=1,\ldots,N\). This implies that \[\mathcal{G}_{g_1}= \mathbbm{1},\] within each space where the set of Yukawa matrices \(\{\Gamma^k\}\) (or, analogously, \(\{\Delta^k\}\)) is linearly independent. Since we are confined to Higgs doublets that couple to quarks--down-type, up-type or both--the proposition in Sect. [2.2](#subsec:group){reference-type="ref" reference="subsec:group"} implies that one or both of the sets \(\{\Gamma^k\}\) and \(\{\Delta^k\}\) are composed of non-zero and linearly independent matrices for each irreducible sector of \(\Phi\). Hence, \[\mathcal{G}_{g_1} = \mathbbm{1}_{n \times n}, \label{is1}\] in the whole space of Higgs doublets that couple to quarks. Finally, we can analyse Eqs. [\[H_GL_3\]](#H_GL_3){reference-type="eqref" reference="H_GL_3"}, [\[GR=GL\]](#GR=GL){reference-type="eqref" reference="GR=GL"} and [\[is1\]](#is1){reference-type="eqref" reference="is1"} jointly. If \(\Phi\) is in a faithful representation, then \(g_1=e\) and no residual symmetry is present. In this case, \(e^{i\theta}=1\) in Eq. [\[H_GL_3\]](#H_GL_3){reference-type="eqref" reference="H_GL_3"}. If \(g_1\neq e\) (\(e^{i\theta}\neq 1\)), then \(\Phi\) is unfaithful and some residual symmetry will be present in the final Lagrangian, without constraining the mixing. This residual symmetry should be specifically represented by Eqs. [\[H_GL_3\]](#H_GL_3){reference-type="eqref" reference="H_GL_3"}, [\[GR=GL\]](#GR=GL){reference-type="eqref" reference="GR=GL"} and [\[is1\]](#is1){reference-type="eqref" reference="is1"}, which is just part of the baryon number conservation. This completes the proof of the theorem, which generalises that in Ref. , by including the constraints on the right-handed quark sector. Without the latter constraints, theories leading to unphysical massless quarks would not be precluded.[^2] At this point two remarks are in order. First, any SM-like Lagrangian, as the one in Eq. [\[LY_before\]](#LY_before){reference-type="eqref" reference="LY_before"}, exhibits automatic conservation of the baryon number \(U(1)_B\), independently of additional gauge or flavour symmetries. Such accidental symmetry imposes no constraints on masses and mixing, and remains conserved after electroweak symmetry breaking. The proof above shows that a non-block-diagonal \(V_{CKM}\) is compatible with some residual symmetry inside \(G\) only if the latter is a subgroup belonging to \(U(1)_B\). Second, we should stress that Eq. [\[is1\]](#is1){reference-type="eqref" reference="is1"} applies only to the Higgs doublets that couple to quarks. The Higgs doublets that appear solely in the scalar potential are important when analysing possible vacuum alignments, but they are irrelevant for the statement of the theorem. Notice that no information of the scalar potential and vevs has been used in this proof. That is, the theorem constrains residual symmetries and can be applied to virtually any model. Nevertheless, our interest in this article lies on NHDM, and, as we will show in Sect. [3](#sec:examples){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:examples"}, the explicit transformation properties of the Higgs scalars, their vevs, and their relation to the subgroup chains are crucial, in particular, for the application of the theorem to specific symmetries of complete models of scalars and fermions. ## Some illustrative examples {#subsec:examples} The theorem proved in the previous section is completely general; yet it is useful to study in more detail several particular cases that one may come across. We split them into four classes depending on whether the representations \(D(Q_L)\) and \(D(\Phi)\) of \(G\), acting, respectively, on the left quark space \(Q_L\) and the scalar space \(\Phi\), are faithful or not. We denote the kernel of the representation of \(D(Q_L)\) by \(\ker D(Q_L)\) and write \(\ker D(Q_L)=\{e\}\) if the representation is faithful. Otherwise \(\ker D(Q_L)\) is the subgroup of \(G\) which is mapped to the identity by the representation of \(Q_L\). 1. \(Q_L\) and \(\Phi\) faithful: \(\ker D(Q_L) =\ker D(\Phi)=\{e\}\) A direct application of the theorem implies that if \(\left<\Phi\right>\) does not break \(G\) completely, then there is a residual symmetry in the fermion sector leading to a block-diagonal mixing. 2. \(Q_L\) unfaithful and \(\Phi\) faithful: \(\ker D(Q_L)\neq \{e\}\) and \(\ker D(\Phi)=\{e\}\) The full symmetry in the left sector is smaller than the one in the scalar sector and, in principle, we could have the proper subgroup \(\ker D(Q_L)\) of \(G\) (or smaller) unbroken by \(\left<\Phi\right>\). However, Eq. [\[is1\]](#is1){reference-type="eqref" reference="is1"} should hold and \(\left<\Phi\right>\) should break \(G\) completely. As an example, let us take \(G=A_4\) with \(Q_L\sim (\boldsymbol{1},\boldsymbol{1}',\boldsymbol{1}'')\) and \(\Phi\sim d_R\sim u_R\sim \boldsymbol{3}\). If \(\left<\Phi\right>\sim(1,0,0)\), the \(\mathbb{Z}_2\) subgroup generated by \(g_1=\mathrm{diag}\,(1,-1,-1)\) is conserved and is contained in \(\ker D(Q_L)\). The representation \(\mathcal{G}_{Lg_1}=\mathbbm{1}_3\) satisfies Eq. [\[H_GL_3\]](#H_GL_3){reference-type="eqref" reference="H_GL_3"}, but Eqs. [\[GR=GL\]](#GR=GL){reference-type="eqref" reference="GR=GL"} and [\[is1\]](#is1){reference-type="eqref" reference="is1"} are not valid as \(\mathcal{G}_{g_1}=\mathcal{G}_{Rg_1}^d=\mathcal{G}_{Rg_1}^u=\mathrm{diag}\,(1,-1,-1)\). Therefore, we end up with a non-trivial residual symmetry, but the invertibility of \(M_u\) and \(M_d\) assumed in Eq. [\[GR=GL\]](#GR=GL){reference-type="eqref" reference="GR=GL"} is lost. 3. \(Q_L\) faithful and \(\Phi\) unfaithful: \(\ker D(Q_L)=\{e\}\) and \(\ker D(\Phi) \neq\{e\}\) This case is automatically excluded unless \(\ker D(\Phi)\) acts like baryon number on quarks. The full symmetry of the potential is \(G/\ker D(\Phi)\) and \(\left<\Phi\right>\) can never break \(\ker D(\Phi)\). As an example, let us take \(G=A_4\) with \((\phi_1,\phi_2,\phi_3)\sim (\boldsymbol{1},\boldsymbol{1}',\boldsymbol{1}'')\) and \(Q_L\sim d_R\sim u_R\sim \boldsymbol{3}\). If all \(\phi_k\) get non-zero vevs, they only break \(A_4\) to \(\mathbb{Z}_2\times\mathbb{Z}_2\), which corresponds to the kernel of the representation of \(\Phi\), and is generated by \(\mathrm{diag}\,(1,-1,-1)\) and \(\mathrm{diag}\,(-1,-1,1)\). This subgroup remains in the \(Q_L\) quark sector and the CKM matrix would be trivial. 4. \(Q_L\) and \(\Phi\) unfaithful: \(\ker D(Q_L) \neq \{e\}\) and \(\ker D(\Phi)\) \(\neq \{e\}\) This case can be discarded given the Yukawa structure in Eq. [\[LY_before\]](#LY_before){reference-type="eqref" reference="LY_before"} and the assumption that at least one of the representations for \(Q_L,\Phi,d_R,u_R\) is a faithful irrep or contains a faithful irrep (i.e. \(G\), and not a smaller group, is the full flavour symmetry); see also [\[ap:yukawa\]](#ap:yukawa){reference-type="ref" reference="ap:yukawa"}. During the proof and consequent remarks of the theorem, nothing has been said about the reducibility or irreducibility of \(\Phi\). If \(\Phi\) is an irreducible representation of the full flavour group \(G\), then the same field components \(\phi_i\) couple to the up and down sectors. In the case that \(\Phi\) is a reducible representation of \(G\), the components \(\phi_i\) can be arranged into irreducible multiplets just like in Eq. [\[Phi_decomp\]](#Phi_decomp){reference-type="eqref" reference="Phi_decomp"}. In this case, there are many ways of breaking the flavour group \(G\) completely in order to allow for models with non-zero and non-degenerate masses with viable \(V_{CKM}\) (see end of Sect. [2.2](#subsec:group){reference-type="ref" reference="subsec:group"} for the different possibilities). We shall comment on case (1d) of Sect. [2.2](#subsec:group){reference-type="ref" reference="subsec:group"}, which is the most predictive and hence one of the most common approaches in model building, since each quark sector has its own non-trivial residual symmetry while the full flavour group \(G\) is completely broken. This will lead, in general, to strong constraints to the mixing angles and the CP phase. For instance, in Ref. , the authors studied which would be the best residual symmetries in order to accommodate the experimental CKM mixing matrix. This was done in the context of the von Dyck flavour groups . It is shown that the flavour groups \(D_N\) and \(\Delta(6N^2)\), with \(N\) an integer multiple of 7, are capable of determining the mixing angle \(\theta_{12}\) close to its experimental value, if we fix \(\theta_{23}=\theta_{13}=0\). Non-zero values for all three mixing angles require, on the other hand, infinite von Dyck groups. We summarise in Table [\[table:constraints\]](#table:constraints){reference-type="ref" reference="table:constraints"} the different possibilities for the CKM mixing angles and mass spectra depending on the existence (or not) of a residual symmetry in the whole theory. In the presence of a residual symmetry, not contained in \(U(1)_B\), we can either have at most three non-zero mixing angles with some massless quarks, as in example (ii) above, or have massive quarks with at most one non-zero mixing angle, as in example (iii). # Application of the theorem to flavour models {#sec:examples} The no-go theorem previously demonstrated strongly constrains viable flavour models based on a full flavour symmetry \(G\) of the Lagrangian. However, it is crucial for its application that one can determine the symmetry properties of the vevs. In this section, we shall perform this task by introducing the notion of pseudo-invariance of the vevs under subgroups of the original group. We illustrate the technique by applying it to some examples of flavour groups commonly found in the literature to explain fermion masses and mixing. Before proceeding with the examples, it is worth recalling the distinction between what is meant by "full flavour group" and by simply "flavour group". As said before, in model building, we may add symmetries that act only on the flavour space of the model. Those symmetries are usually taken to be subgroups of \(SU(N)\) (in particular \(SU(3)\), when we are dealing with three fermion generations). We refer to these symmetries as flavour symmetries \(K\). However, the full flavour symmetry group \(G\) is, in general, larger since it contains the global hypercharge transformation, i.e. \(G=K\times U(1)_Y\).[^3] The accidental baryon symmetry \(U(1)_B\) is not included in the full flavour symmetry \(G\) because the Higgs fields do not transform under it, but it might happen that \(G\) intersects \(U(1)_B\). We further assume that there is no additional accidental symmetry in the Yukawa Lagrangian [\[LY_before\]](#LY_before){reference-type="eqref" reference="LY_before"}, apart from \(G\) and \(U(1)_B\) (see Refs.  for methods for detecting them). The additional \(U(1)_Y\) in the full flavour symmetry is of extreme importance. As we shall see, one may break completely the flavour symmetry \(K\) but still leave a non-trivial residual symmetry in \(G\). To better understand this scenario, we introduce the notion of pseudo-invariant vacuum. In our discussion we have used the invariance of the vacuum, i.e. Eq. [\[sym_vac\]](#sym_vac){reference-type="eqref" reference="sym_vac"}, in order to constrain the possible viable models. This vacuum invariance has been defined in the full flavour group \(G\). Looking only to the flavour group \(K\), we may extend the notion of invariance to pseudo-invariance of an irrep through the condition \[\left( \mathcal{G}_{\tilde{g}_1} \right)_{kl}\, v_l = e^{i\alpha}v_k\quad\text{with}\quad \tilde{g}_1\in K. \label{pseudsym_vac}\] The group element \(\tilde{g}_1\) changes the vacuum by a global phase transformation. In general, these global phase transformations are not contained in \(K\), but they are contained in \(G\) due to the \(U(1)_Y\) global group. This means that, for a given irrep, any pseudo-invariant vacuum in \(K\) can be written as an invariant one in \(G\). Therefore, instead of dealing with the full flavour group \(G\), we may restrict ourselves to the flavour group \(K\) and its non-trivial pseudo-invariant vevs. Note that if \(\Phi\) is composed of more than one irrep \(\varphi_j\), as in Eq. [\[Phi_decomp\]](#Phi_decomp){reference-type="eqref" reference="Phi_decomp"}, a pseudo-invariant vev where \[\left( \mathcal{G}_{\tilde{g}_1} \right)_{kl}\, v_l^{\varphi_j} = e^{i\alpha_j}v_k^{\varphi_j}\,,\quad\text{with}\quad \tilde{g}_1\in K\,, \label{pseudsym_vac:irreps}\] is equivalent to an invariant vev of \(G\) only if all vevs in each irrep transform by the same global phase, i.e., \(\alpha_j=\alpha\). One consequence immediately follows: the presence of an invariant Higgs doublet, singlet with respect to \(K\), may be relevant. For example, consider down-type quarks interacting only with one \(\mathbf{n}\)-dimensional irrep \(\varphi_1=(\phi_1,\ldots,\phi_n)\) whose vev is pseudo-invariant by an element \(\tilde{g}_1 \neq e\) with \(\alpha_1\neq 0\). The mass matrix \(M_d\) will possess a non-trivial residual symmetry. Now, suppose we add a trivial irrep \(\varphi_2=\phi_{n+1}\sim\mathbf{1}\) that also interacts with down-type quarks. Any vev for \(\varphi_2\) will be strictly invariant by \(K\), with \(\alpha_2=0\) in Eq. [\[pseudsym_vac:irreps\]](#pseudsym_vac:irreps){reference-type="eqref" reference="pseudsym_vac:irreps"}. Hence, \(M_d\) will no longer possess the previous residual symmetry. We remark that Eq. [\[pseudsym_vac:irreps\]](#pseudsym_vac:irreps){reference-type="eqref" reference="pseudsym_vac:irreps"} (and consequently Eq. [\[pseudsym_vac\]](#pseudsym_vac){reference-type="eqref" reference="pseudsym_vac"}) is merely an eigenvalue equation. Therefore, from a simple group-theoretical method, and without analysing the scalar potential, we can extract a set of vacuum alignments that will be automatically excluded by the theorem, namely those corresponding to the eigenvectors of \(\mathcal{G}_{\tilde{g}_1}\). Notice, however, that the vev alignments obtained through this procedure may not be global minima of the scalar potential. Yet, this is a straightforward group-theoretical check in the spirit familiar to model building. One could instead follow a geometrical method  to find first the global minima of the scalar potential. In the latter case, if all the minima preserve some subgroup of the initial symmetry, the theorem applies directly without the need of solving the eigenvalue equation [\[pseudsym_vac:irreps\]](#pseudsym_vac:irreps){reference-type="eqref" reference="pseudsym_vac:irreps"}. The drawback is that the geometrical approach is not universal, and it is not guaranteed that it could easily be applied to more complicated Higgs sectors, for example to some high symmetry groups in 4HDM. Next we shall present three examples of flavour groups in the context of 3HDM, two of them with \(\Phi\) being in a faithful triplet representation, for the \(\Delta(27)\) and \(A_4\) flavour groups, and one example with \(\Phi\) in a reducible triplet representation, for the \(S_3\) flavour group. ## The flavour group \(\Delta(27)\) in 3HDM {#sec:D27} The flavour group \(\Delta(27)\)  is a subgroup of \(SU(3)\) and can be viewed as the group defined by two generators \(a\) and \(b\), with presentation \[a^3 = b^3 = (a b)^3 = 1. \label{presentation}\] We use the specific three-dimensional implementation : \[a = \left( \begin{array}{ccc} 1 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & \omega & 0\\ 0 & 0 & \omega^2 \end{array} \right), \ \ \ b = \left( \begin{array}{ccc} 0 & 1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 1\\ 1 & 0 & 0 \end{array} \right), \label{D27:a_and_b}\] where \(\omega = e^{2 i \pi/3}\). The group has 27 elements divided into 11 irreducible representations: nine singlets \(\mathbf{1}_{(i,j)}\), with \(i,j = 0,1,2\); and two triplets, \(\mathbf{3}_{(0,1)}\) and \(\mathbf{3}_{(0,2)}\). There are two elements of particular interest. One is \[d \equiv b^2\, a\, b = \left( \begin{array}{ccc} \omega^2 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & \omega \end{array} \right). \label{D27:d}\] Indeed, since \(\Delta(27)\) is isomorphic to \(Z_3 \times Z_3 \rtimes Z_3\) we can view the first two \(Z_3\)'s as generated by \(a\) and \(d\) (they obviously commute), while the third one is generated by \(b\). The second element of interest is \[h \equiv a^2\, b\, a\, b^2 = \omega\, \left( \begin{array}{ccc} 1 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 1 \end{array} \right). \label{D27:h}\] The \(Z_3\) group generated by \(h\) is the only \(Z_3\) invariant subgroup of \(\Delta(27)\). A summary of the subgroups and their generators is presented in Fig. [\[fig:Delta27_graph\]](#fig:Delta27_graph){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:Delta27_graph"}, based on Ref. . The eigenvectors \((v_1, v_2, v_3)\) associated to the generators of the \(Z_3 \times Z_3\) invariant subgroups of \(\Delta(27)\) are given by \[\begin{aligned} \begin{split} a^2b:&&\ (1, 1, \omega),\ \ (1, \omega, 1),\ \ (\omega, 1, 1);\\ ab:&&\ (1, 1, \omega^2),\ \ (1, \omega^2, 1),\ \ (\omega^2, 1, 1);\\ a:&&\ (0, 0, 1),\ \ (0,1, 0),\ \ (1, 0, 0);\\ b:&&\ (1, 1, 1),\ \ (1,\omega, \omega^2),\ \ (1,\omega^2, \omega). \end{split} \label{nvevD27} \end{aligned}\] Any of the vacuum alignments presented above automatically leads to a non-trivial residual symmetry in the final Lagrangian. Actually, because all elements of the triplet irrep of \(\Delta(27)\) have eigenvalues \(1,\, \omega\) or \(\omega^2\), any pseudo-invariant vacuum alignment can be seen, with the help of \(h\), as an invariant one of another element of \(\Delta(27)\). Notice also that \(h\) leaves pseudo-invariant any type of vacuum alignment. However, it is not of real interest since \(h \in \mathbb{Z}_3\), i.e. is the center of \(SU(3)\). As already pointed out, these transformations are included in the \(U(1)_Y\) part of full flavour group \(G\). Therefore, we just need to look at the \(\Delta(27)/\mathbb{Z}_3\) group. In this case, some alignments in Eq. [\[nvevD27\]](#nvevD27){reference-type="eqref" reference="nvevD27"} will break the flavour group, but the full flavour group will still be broken to a non-trivial subgroup. The group-theoretical method presented above allows us to exclude several alignments without the need of dealing with the details of the scalar potential. However, this method tell us nothing about the global minima of the potential. Minimizing the general scalar potential for 3HDM is a very hard task, and until now no good method has been developed. When the potential exhibits some symmetry, the geometrical method  can give us the answer (specially for large symmetry groups). This method has been used in the study of \(\Delta(27)\) in 3HDM, where four classes of global minima are found , corresponding precisely to the eigenvectors given in Eq. [\[nvevD27\]](#nvevD27){reference-type="eqref" reference="nvevD27"}.[^4] Therefore, for the flavour group \(\Delta(27)\) all the global minima of the potential are excluded by the theorem. Said otherwise, one cannot construct a viable model based on \(\Delta(27)\) where \(\Phi\) is in a faithful (triplet) irrep. ## The flavour group \(A_4\) in 3HDM {#sec:A4} The flavour group \(A_4\) can be viewed as the group defined by two generators \(s\) and \(t\), with presentation \[s^2=t^3=(st)^3=1.\] The group \(A_4\) has one non-trivial invariant subgroup; \(Z_2\times Z_2\), generated by \(s\) and \(tst^2\). It also has four subgroups \(Z_3\), generated by \(t\), \(tst\), \(st\) and \(st^2\), and three subgroups \(Z_2\) generated by \(s\), \(t^2st\) and \(tst^2\). A summary of the subgroups and their generators is shown in Fig. [\[fig:A4_graph\]](#fig:A4_graph){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:A4_graph"}, based on Ref. . A possible matrix representation for the three-dimensional irrep is \[s= \begin{pmatrix} 1&0&0\\ 0&-1&0\\ 0&0&-1 \end{pmatrix}\,,\quad t= \begin{pmatrix} 0&1&0\\ 0&0&1\\ 1&0&0 \end{pmatrix}\. \label{A4:s_and_t}\] We can use the group-theoretical method in order to find the set of alignments forbidden by the theorem. In this case, the eigenvectors \((v_1, v_2, v_3)\) associated to the generators of the subgroups are \[\begin{aligned} \begin{split} t:&&\ (1,1,1),\ \ (1,\omega,\omega^2),\ \ (1,\omega^2,\omega);\\ tst:&&\ (-1,1,1),\ \ (-1,\omega,\omega^2),\ \ (-1,\omega^2,\omega);\\ st:&&\ (1,-1,1),\ \ (1,-\omega,\omega^2),\ \ (1,-\omega^2,\omega);\\ st^2:&&\ (1,1,-1),\ \ (1,\omega,-\omega^2),\ \ (1,\omega^2,-\omega);\\ s:&&\ (1,0,0),\ \ (0,v_2,v_3);\\ t^2st:&&\ (0,1,0),\ \ (v_1,0,v_3);\\ tst^2:&&\ (0,0,1),\ \ (v_1,v_2,0), \end{split} \label{nvevA4} \end{aligned}\] where \(v_1, v_2\) and \(v_3\) are complex parameters. Using the geometrical method, the global minima of the \(A_4\) symmetric scalar potential were found to be  \[(1,1,1)\,,\, (1,0,0)\,,\,(\pm 1,e^{i \pi/3},e^{-i \pi/3})\,, \,(1,e^{i\alpha},0)\,,\] up to permutations and global phase transformations. All these global minima are included in the list of alignments given in Eq. [\[nvevA4\]](#nvevA4){reference-type="eqref" reference="nvevA4"}. Indeed, the first two are obviously there; the third vev alignment is \((\pm 1,e^{i \pi/3},e^{-i \pi/3})\) \(=-(\mp 1,\omega^2,\omega)\) and is in the list as well. Finally, the last minimum is a particular case when \(|v_1|=|v_2|\). In summary, each \(A_4\) global minimum leaves invariant a non-trivial subgroup of the full flavour symmetry \(G=A_4\times U(1)_Y\) and is thus excluded by the no-go theorem. That is, one cannot construct a viable model based on \(A_4\) where \(\Phi\) is in a faithful (triplet) irrep . It is interesting to consider an example similar to the one we included in point (ii) of Sect. [2.4](#subsec:examples){reference-type="ref" reference="subsec:examples"}, where the representations are \(Q_L\sim (\boldsymbol{1},\boldsymbol{1}',\boldsymbol{1}'')\) and \(\Phi\sim d_R\sim u_R\sim \boldsymbol{3}\). Now we take \(\left<\Phi\right> \sim(1, e^{i \alpha}, 0)\). This leaves invariant a residual subgroup with generators \(\mathcal{G}_L = \textrm{diag}(1,1,1)\) and \(\mathcal{G}_{R}^{u} = \mathcal{G}_{R}^{d} = \mathcal{G} = \textrm{diag}(1,1,-1)\). The mass matrices for the up-and down-quarks may be written as \[\left( \begin{array}{ccc} a & a\, e^{i\alpha} & 0\\ b & b\, \omega\, e^{i\alpha} & 0\\ c & c\, \omega^2\, e^{i\alpha} & 0 \end{array} \right).\] This implies that, after up-and down-quark mass matrix diagonalisation, there remain three mixing angles and three non-degenerate quark masses. However, these matrices are not invertible, which signals the presence of massless quarks in both up and down sectors, in contradiction with the experiment. If we had looked exclusively at the left-handed quark sector, as in Ref. , we would have accepted this model as a viable one. Although the symmetry has been completely broken in the left sector, the full Lagrangian has an unbroken symmetry in the right-handed quark sector. It is precisely here where the residual symmetry acts non-trivially and the no-go theorem applies. ## The flavour group \(S_3\) in 3HDM {#sec:S3} Since the group \(S_3\) is the smallest non-Abelian discrete symmetry, it has been widely used for flavour physics in the quark and lepton sectors (for recent works see e.g. Refs. , and references therein). The flavour group \(S_3\) can be viewed as the group defined by two generators, \(a\) and \(b\), with presentation \[a^3=b^2=(ab)^2=1\.\] It has the non-trivial invariant subgroup \(Z_3\), which is generated by \(a\), and three subgroups \(Z_2\), generated by \(b\), \(ab\) and \(a^2b\). We summarise in Fig. [\[fig:S3_graph\]](#fig:S3_graph){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:S3_graph"} these subgroups and their generators . The \(S_3\) flavour group has no three-dimensional irrep. Therefore, any 3HDM with a scalar potential invariant under this group, with a faithful representation, must be built from a two-dimensional irrep \(\mathbf{2}\) and one of the one-dimensional irreps, \(\mathbf{1}\) or \(\mathbf{1}^\prime\). The representation of the generators for these irreps can be chosen as \[\begin{aligned} \begin{split} \mathbf{2}:&\quad a=\begin{pmatrix} \omega&0\\ 0&\omega^2 \end{pmatrix}\,,\, b=\begin{pmatrix} 0&1\\ 1&0 \end{pmatrix},\\ \mathbf{1}:&\quad a=b=1,\\ \mathbf{1}^\prime:&\quad a=-b=1. \end{split} \end{aligned}\] When building an \(S_3\) flavour model we have to decide whether our reducible three-dimensional representation is \(\mathbf{2}+\mathbf{1}\) or \(\mathbf{2}+\mathbf{1}^\prime\). We may represent them in the compact form \[\mathbf{3}_{\pm}:\quad a= \begin{pmatrix} \omega&0&0\\ 0&\omega^2&0\\ 0&0&1 \end{pmatrix}\,,\quad b_{\pm}= \begin{pmatrix} 0&1&0\\ 1&0&0\\ 0&0&\pm 1 \end{pmatrix}\,, \label{S3:a_and_b}\] with the plus and minus signs assigned to \(\mathbf{2}+\mathbf{1}\) and \(\mathbf{2}+\mathbf{1}^\prime\), respectively. Following the group-theoretical method, we can find the set of vev alignments forbidden by the theorem. In this case, the eigenvectors associated to the reducible generators of the subgroups will be denoted by \(((v_1,v_2),u)\), in order to distinguish the doublet from the singlet irrep. The corresponding eigenvectors for the \(\mathbf{\mathbf{3}}_{\pm}\) are \[\begin{aligned} \begin{split} a:&&\ ((1,0),0),\ ((0,1),0),\ ((0,0),1) ;\\ b_+:&&\ ((v,v),u),\ ((-1,1),0) ;\\ b_-:&&\ ((1,1),0),\ ((-v,v),u) ;\\ ab_+:&&\ ((v\,\omega,v),u),\ ((-\omega,1),0) ;\\ ab_-:&&\ ((\omega,1),0),\ ((-v\,\omega,v),u) ;\\ a^2b_+:&&\ ((v\,\omega^2,v),u),\ ((1,-1),0) ;\\ a^2b_-:&&\ ((\omega^2,1),0),\ ((-v\,\omega^2,v),u). \end{split} \label{nvevS3} \end{aligned}\] Thus, if the \(S_3\) singlet \(\mathbf{1}\) acquires a vev, we can then conclude from Eqs. [\[nvevS3\]](#nvevS3){reference-type="eqref" reference="nvevS3"} that we are not allowed to have the vev alignments \((1,1)\,,\,(\omega,1)\,,\,(\omega^2,1)\) for the two Higgs doublets in the \(S_3\) doublet irrep. Similarly, if the \(S_3\) singlet \(\mathbf{1}^\prime\) acquires a vev, the alignments \((-1,1)\), \((-\omega,1)\), \((-\omega^2,1)\) are excluded. Of course, it remains to be seen whether all global minima of the \(S_3\)-invariant Higgs scalar potential are contained or not in the set of forbidden vev alignments. # Conclusions {#sec:conclusions} In this work we have studied the connection between the breaking of flavour symmetries by the Higgs vevs and the existence of residual symmetries in the quark mass matrices. We have performed two tasks. First, in order to avoid nonphysical quark masses and mixing, we have developed a simple but powerful no-go theorem, highlighting the importance of including the transformation properties of the right-handed fields. Second, we have shown that, in many instances, exploring the eigenspaces of all the subgroups of the original flavour group is sufficient to study all the relevant vevs. The vevs of the scalars coupled to the quarks have to break the full flavour symmetry (or break it into a subgroup acting as baryon number) in order to avoid nonphysical quark masses and mixing. In this context, the notion of full flavour group turns out to be important. While, in general, one refers to the flavour group as the group added to the SM acting globally on the flavour space, the SM gauge group already contains the global hypercharge transformation that should also be taken into account. The inclusion of this additional flavour transformation builds what we call the full flavour group. Then the problem of finding the vevs left invariant by the full flavour group and, therefore, excluded by the theorem, turns into the problem of finding all pseudo-invariant vevs of the flavour group, discussed here for the first time. As we have shown through some examples, it is possible to find a set of excluded vev alignments (minima or not of the scalar potential) just by determining the eigenvectors of the Higgs representation for each flavour group element. If the global minima are known, as it is the case of 3HDM with \(A_4\) or \(\Delta(27)\) symmetric potentials, one then needs only to check whether these minima are contained in the set of excluded alignments. For 3HDM with \(A_4\) (or \(S_4\)) and \(\Delta(27)\) symmetric potentials, this is indeed verified and thus these models are excluded. In this case, a phenomenologically viable description of the quark sector requires that (1) the symmetry is explicitly broken by new interaction terms, or (2) higher-order interaction terms in the Higgs potential are present, which could then lead to the complete breaking of the \(A_4\) or \(\Delta(27)\) group upon minimisation of the potentials, or (3) additional non-invariant scalar multiplets are added to the theory. In more realistic but non-minimal models, one or more of these options are necessarily implemented. The same type of analysis can be carried out for other groups and, in particular, for smaller groups which have a more complex scalar potential. While we only treated quarks in our discussion, the extension of the theorem to the whole fermion sector, including leptons, is straightforward. If neutrinos are Dirac-type particles the analogy is direct. There is the experimental possibility of a massless neutrino, however, as shown in our analysis, all cases with CP violation always imply a massless fermion in each sector. The case where neutrinos are Majorana-type particles is more interesting since there is a larger number of possible implementations. Lepton number is no longer conserved and thus the theorem will be slightly modified. *Note added:* While our paper was undergoing the review process, Ref.  appeared, in which a classification of lepton mixing matrices is performed based on the assumption that the residual symmetries in the charged-lepton and neutrino mass matrices originate from a finite flavour symmetry group. [^1]: Here we only consider Higgs doublets that couple to quarks. [^2]: We give one such example at the end of Sect. [3.2](#sec:A4){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:A4"}. [^3]: The center of \(SU(N)\) is \(Z(SU(N))=\mathbb{Z}_N\), which is already included in the \(U(1)\) global transformations of \(G\). To avoid redundancy we may work with the projective group \(PSU(N)=SU(N)/\mathbb{Z}_N\), and define the flavour symmetry as a subgroup of \(PSU(N)\) instead. [^4]: We do not include minima which differ by an (irrelevant) overall phase. For example, one could have \((\omega, \omega^2, 1)\), but this minimum equals the phase \(\omega\) multiplied by \((1, \omega, \omega^2)\), which is already taken into account.

{'timestamp': '2014-07-10T02:09:41', 'yymm': '1401', 'arxiv_id': '1401.5807', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5807'}

# Introduction Church's realisability problem has motivated the development of the beautiful theories of finite games of infinite duration, and finite automata over infinite structures. These two fields have often inspired and influenced each other. The quest for optimal complementation and determinisation of nondeterministic automata has been long and fruitful. The quest for optimal  complementation techniques seems to have been settled with matching upper and lower bounds. A similar observation might, on first glance, be made for  determinisation, as matching upper and lower bounds were established shortly after those for complementation. However, while these bounds are tight to the state, they refer to deterministic Rabin automata only, with an exponential number of Rabin pairs in the states of the initial  automaton. Choosing Rabin automata as targets is not the only natural choice. The dual acceptance condition, suggested by Streett, would be a similarly natural goal, and determinising to parity automata seems to be an even more attractive target, as emptiness games for parity automata have a lower computational complexity compared to emptiness games for Streett or Rabin automata. For parity and Streett automata, however, no similarly tight result is known. Indeed, the best known algorithm provides an \(O(n!^2)\) bound on the states (for state-based acceptance; the bound can be improved to \(O(n!(n-1)!)\) when transition based acceptance is used) of a deterministic parity automaton obtained from a nondeterministic  automaton with \(n\) states, as compared to the approximately \((1.65n)^n\) states of the smallest deterministic Rabin automaton. Another argument for using parity or Streett conditions is that determinisation constructions are often nested. E.g., in distributed synthesis, several co-determinisation (determinisation of the complement language) steps are used. Using Rabin automata as a target in one step, one has to use a determinisation technique for Streett automata in the next. Streett determinisation, however, is significantly more involved and expensive. In this paper, we introduce determinisation procedures for nondeterministic parity automata to deterministic Rabin and parity automata. Using an algorithmic representation that extends the determinisation procedures from, we show that the number of states used in the determinisation of nondeterministic  automata cannot be reduced by a single state, while we establish the tightness of our parity determinisation procedure to below a constant factor of \(1.5\), even if we allow for Streett acceptance. This also shows that determinising parity automata to Rabin automata leads to a smaller blow-up than the determinisation to parity or Streett. As a special case, this holds in particular for Büchi automata. #### Transition-based acceptance. {#transition-based-acceptance. .unnumbered} We use a transition based acceptance mechanism for various reasons. Transition-based acceptance mechanisms have proven to be a more natural target of automata transformations. Indeed, all determinisation procedures quoted above have a natural representation with an acceptance condition on transitions, and their translation to state-based acceptance is by multiplying the acceptance from the last transition to the statespace. A similar observation can be made for other automata transformations, like the removal of \(\varepsilon\)-transitions from translations of \(\mu\)-calculi and the treatment of asynchronous systems, where the statespace grows by multiplication with the acceptance information (e.g., maximal priority on a finite sequence of transitions), while it can only shrink in case of transition based acceptance. Similarly, tools like [SPOT]{.smallcaps} offer more concise automata with transition-based acceptance mechanism as a translation from LTL. Using state-based acceptance in the automaton that we want to determinise would also complicate the presentation. But first and foremost, using transition based acceptance provides cleaner results. #### Related work. {#related-work. .unnumbered} Besides the work on complementing and determinising  automata, tight bounds have been obtained for generalised  automata, and specialised algorithms for complementing and determinising Streett automata have been studied. The NP-completeness of minimising deterministic  or parity automata suggests that it would be infeasible to look for polynomially bigger automata and to minimise them subsequently, whereas minimising the number of priorities of a deterministic parity automaton is cheap and simple . The construction of deterministic Co automata with a one-sided error, which is correct for Co recognisable languages, and decision procedures that use emptiness equivalent Büchi  or safety automata instead of language equivalent automata have also been studied. # Preliminaries We denote the set of non-negative integers by \(\omega\), i.e. \(\omega = \{0,1,2,3...\}\). For a finite alphabet \(\Sigma\), we use \(\Sigma^*\) to denote the set of finite sequences over \(\Sigma\), \(\Sigma^+\) to denote the set of finite non-empty sequences over \(\Sigma\), and \(\Sigma^{\omega}\) to denote the set of infinite sequences over \(\Sigma\). An infinite *word* \(\alpha: \omega \rightarrow \Sigma\) is an infinite sequence of letters \(\alpha_0 \alpha_1 \alpha_2 \cdots\) from \(\Sigma\). We use \([k]\) to represent \(\{1,2,\ldots,k\}\). \(\omega\)-automata are finite automata that are interpreted over infinite words and recognise \(\omega\)-regular languages \(L\subseteq \Sigma^{\omega}\). Nondeterministic \(\omega\)-automata are quintuples \(\mathcal{N}=(Q,\Sigma,I,T,\mathcal{F})\), where \(Q\) is a finite set of states with a non-empty subset \(I\subseteq Q\) of initial states, \(\Sigma\) is a finite alphabet, \(T:Q \times \Sigma \times Q\) is a transition relation that maps states and input letters to sets of successor states, and \(\mathcal{F}\) is an acceptance condition. In this paper, we consider Rabin, Streett, parity, and  acceptance. A *run* \(\rho\) of a nondeterministic \(\omega\)-automaton \(\mathcal{N}\) on an input word \(\alpha\) is an infinite sequence \(\rho: \omega\rightarrow Q\) of states of \(\mathcal{N}\), also denoted \(\rho = q_0 q_1 q_2\cdots \in Q^{\omega}\), such that the first symbol of \(\rho\) is an initial state \(q_0\in I\) and, for all \(i\in\omega\), \((q_{i},\alpha_{i},q_{i+1})\in T\) is a valid transition. For a run \(\rho\) on a word \(\alpha\), we denote with \(\overline{\rho}: i \mapsto \big(\rho(i),\alpha(i),\rho(i+1)\big)\) the transitions of \(\rho\). Let \(\infi(\rho) = \{q\in Q \mid \forall i \in \omega \; \exists j>i\mbox{ such that } \rho(j)=q\}\) denote the set of all states that occur infinitely often during the run \(\rho\). Likewise, let \(\infi(\overline{\rho})=\{t\in T \mid \forall i \in \omega \; \exists j>i\mbox{ such that } \overline{\rho}(j)=t\}\) denote the set of all transitions that are taken infinitely many times in \(\rho\). In this paper, we use acceptance conditions over transitions. Acceptance mechanisms over states can be defined accordingly. *Rabin* automata are \(\omega\)-automata, whose acceptance is defined by a family of pairs \(\{(A_i,R_i)\mid i \in J\}\), with \(A_i,R_i \subseteq T\), of accepting and rejecting transitions for all indices \(i\) of some index set \(J\). A run \(\rho\) of a Rabin automaton is *accepting* if there is an index \(i\in J\), such that infinitely many accepting transitions \(t \in A_i\), but only finitely many rejecting transitions \(t \in R_j\) occur in \(\overline{\rho}\). That is, if there is an \(i\in J\) such that \(\infi(\overline{\rho}) \cap A_i \neq \emptyset = \infi(\overline{\rho}) \cap R_i\). *Streett* automata are \(\omega\)-automata, whose acceptance is defined by a family of pairs \(\{(G_i,B_i)\mid i \in J\}\), with \(G_i,B_i \subseteq T\), of good and bad transitions for all indices \(i\) of some index set \(J\). A run \(\rho\) of a Streett automaton is *accepting* if, for all indices \(i\in J\), some good transition \(t \in G_i\) or no bad transition \(t \in B_j\) occur infinitely often in \(\overline{\rho}\). That is, if, for all \(i\in J\), \(\infi(\overline{\rho}) \cap G_i \neq \emptyset\) or \(\infi(\overline{\rho}) \cap B_i = \emptyset\) holds. *Parity* automata are \(\omega\)-automata, whose acceptance is defined by a priority function \(\pri:T \rightarrow [c]\) for some \(c \in \mathbb N\). A run \(\rho\) of a parity automaton is *accepting* if \(\limsup_{n\rightarrow\infty} \pri\big(\overline{\rho}(n)\big)\) is even, that is, if the highest priority that occurs infinitely often is even. Parity automata can be viewed as special Rabin, or as special Streett automata. In older works, the parity condition was referred to as Rabin chain condition---because one can represent them by choosing \(A_i\) as the set of states with priority \(\leq 2i\) and \(R_i\) as the sets of states with priorities \(\leq 2i-1\), resulting in a chain \(A_i \subseteq R_i \subseteq A_{i+1} \subseteq \ldots\)---or a Streett chain condition---where \(G_i\) is the set of states with priority \(\geq 2i\), and \(B_i\) is the set of states with priority \(\geq 2i-1\). One-pair Rabin automata \(\mathcal R_1 =\big(Q,\Sigma,I,T,(A,R)\big)\), which are Rabin automata with a singleton index set, such that we directly refer to the only pair \((A,R)\), and *Büchi* automata, which can be viewed as one-pair Rabin automata with an empty set of rejecting states \(R = \emptyset\), are of special technical interest in this paper. For all types of automata, a word \(\alpha\) is accepted by an automaton \(\mathcal A\) iff it has an accepting run, and its language \(\mathcal{L}(\mathcal A)\) is the set of words it accepts. We call an automaton \((Q,\Sigma,I,T,\mathcal{F})\) *deterministic* if \(I\) is singleton and \(T\) contains at most one target node for all pairs of states and input letters, that is, if \((q,\alpha,r),(q,\alpha,s) \in T\) implies \(r = s\). Deterministic automata are denoted \((Q,\Sigma,q_0,\delta,\mathcal{F})\), where \(q_0\) is the only initial state and \(\delta\) is the partial function with \(\delta: (q,\alpha) \mapsto r \Leftrightarrow (q,\alpha,r)\in T\). As nondeterministic automata can block, we also allow them to accept immediately. Technically, one can use a state \(\top\) which every automaton has. From \(\top\), all transitions go back to \(\top\), and sequences that contain one (and thus almost only) \(\top\) states are accepting. This state is not counted to the statespace \(Q\). If we want to include it, we explicitly write \(Q^\top\). # Determinisation A nondeterministic parity automaton \(\mathcal{P}\) is a quintuple \(\big(P,\Sigma,I,T,\pri:T \rightarrow [c] \big)\). This NPA has \(|P|=n\) states and \(c\) priorities (or colours) on the transitions. We will tackle the determinisation of parity automata in three steps. Firstly, we will recall history trees, the data structure for determinising  automata. Secondly, we will describe an adjustment of the data structure and a determinisation procedure from  automata to one-pair Rabin automata. Finally, we will show that this data structure can be nested for the determinisation of parity automata. In, we use ordered labelled trees to depict the states of the deterministic automaton. These ordered labelled trees are called *history trees* in. A *history tree* is an ordered labelled tree \((\T,l)\), where \(\T\) is a finite, prefix closed subset of finite sequences of natural numbers \(\omega\). Every element \(v\in \T\) is called a *node*. Prefix closedness implies that, if a node \(v=n_{1}\ldots n_{j}n_{j+1} \in \T\) is in \(\T\), then \(v'=n_{1}\ldots n_{j}\) is also in \(\T\). We call \(v'\) the predecessor of \(v\), denoted \(\pred(v)\). The empty sequence \(\epsilon \in \T\) is called the *root* of the ordered tree \(\T\). Obviously, \(\epsilon\) has no predecessor. We further require \(\T\) to be *order closed* with respect to siblings: if a node \(v=n_{1}\ldots n_{j}\) is in \(\T\), then \(v'=n_{1}\ldots n_{j-1}i\) is also in \(\T\) for all \(i\in \omega\) with \(i<n_j\). In this case, we call \(v'\) an *older sibling* of \(v\) (and \(v\) a *younger sibling* of \(v'\)). We denote the set of older siblings of \(v\) by \(\os(v)\). A history tree is a tree labelled with sets of automata states. That is, \(l:\T\rightarrow 2^{Q} \smallsetminus \{\emptyset\}\) is a labelling function, which maps nodes of \(\T\) to non-empty sets of automata states. For  automata, the labelling is subject to the following criteria. 1. The label of each node is a subset of the label of its predecessor: \(l(v)\subseteq l(\pred(v))\) holds for all \(\varepsilon \neq v \in \T\). 2. The intersection of the labels of two siblings is disjoint: \(\forall v,v' {\in} \T.\ v {\neq} v' \wedge \pred(v) {=} \pred(v') \Rightarrow l(v) {\cap} l(v') = \emptyset\). 3. The union of the labels of all siblings is *strictly* contained in the label of their predecessor: \(\forall v \in \T\ \exists q \in l(v)\ \forall v' \in \T.\ v=\pred(v') \Rightarrow q \notin l(v')\). ## Determinising one-pair Rabin automata {#Rabindet} For one-pair Rabin automata, it suffices to adjust this data structure slightly. A tree is called a *root history tree* (RHT) if it satisfies (1) and (2) from the definition of history trees, and a relaxed version of (3) that allows for non-strict containment of the label of the root, \(\forall v \in \T \mathbf{\mathbf \smallsetminus \{\varepsilon\}}\ \exists q \in l(v)\ \forall v' \in \T.\ v=\pred(v') \Rightarrow q \notin l(v')\), and the label of the root \(\varepsilon\) *equals* the union of its children's labels, \(l(\varepsilon) = \bigcup\{l(v) \mid v \in \T \cap \omega\}\). Let \(\mathcal{R}_1 = (Q,\Sigma,I,T,(A,R))\) be a nondeterministic one-pair Rabin automaton with \(|Q| = n\) states. We first construct a language equivalent deterministic Rabin automaton \(\mathcal D_1 =(D,\Sigma,d_{0},\Delta,\{(A_i,R_i) \mid i \in J\})\) where, - \(D\) is the set of RHTs over \(Q\), - \(d_{0}\) is the history tree \((\{\varepsilon,0\},\ l:\varepsilon \mapsto I,\ l:0 \mapsto I)\), - \(J\) is the set of nodes \(\neq \varepsilon\) that occur in some RHT of size \(n+1\) (due to the definition of RHTs, an RHT can contain at most \(n+1\) nodes), and - for every tree \(d\in D\) and letter \(\sigma\in\Sigma\), the transition \(d'=\Delta(d,\sigma)\) is the result of the sequence of the transition mechanism described below. The index set is the set of nodes, and, for each index, the accepting and rejecting sets refer to this node. ### **Transition mechanism for determinising one-pair Rabin Automata** {#transition-mechanism-for-determinising-one-pair-rabin-automata .unnumbered} We determine \(\Delta{:}\big((\T,l),\sigma\big) \mapsto (\T',l')\) as follows:

{'timestamp': '2014-01-22T02:11:22', 'yymm': '1401', 'arxiv_id': '1401.5394', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5394'}

# Introduction {#36} Theta functions occur in many parts of mathematics and its applications. While they had roots in the work of Jakob Bernoulli and Euler, they were introduced in full generality, depending on two arguments, by Jacobi. They became very important in nineteenth century complex analysis, because elliptic functions could be expressed in terms of them. Theta functions in several variables, later called *Riemann theta functions*, played a similar role for abelian functions. Riemann's geometric approach and Weierstrass' analytic approach were opposed to each other. Ramanujan, in Chapters 16--21 of his Notebooks, gave many new theta identities, with an emphasis on number theoretical and modular aspects; see Berndt for an edited version with proofs. Algebraic geometry, number theory and combinatorics are some of the fields where theta functions have played an important role since long. New fields of application arose during the last decades of the twentieth century: nonlinear pde's like KdV, solvable models in statistical mechanics, Sklyanin algebra, , elliptic quantum groups and elliptic hypergeometric series, ,. In literature identities involving theta functions abound, see for instance Whittaker & Watson, Erdélyi et al. and Olver et al.  but two identities (given in and ) stand out because of their fundamental nature and because many of the other identities can be derived from them. Both have the form of a sum of products of four theta functions of different arguments being zero, with three terms in the first formula and five terms in the second formula. \[\begin{gathered} \tha_1(u+u_1)\tha_1(u-u_1)\tha_1(u_2+u_3)\tha_1(u_2-u_3) +\tha_1(u+u_2)\tha_1(u-u_2)\tha_1(u_3+u_1)\tha_1(u_3-u_1)\\ +\tha_1(u+u_3)\tha_1(u-u_3)\tha_1(u_1+u_2)\tha_1(u_1-u_2)=0 \label{32} \end{gathered}\] (or equivalently with \(\tha_1\) replaced by \(\si\)), see p.451, Example 5 and p.473, §21.43 in, or (23.10.4) and (23.6.9) in. \[\begin{gathered} 2\,\tha_1(w)\,\tha_1(x)\,\tha_1(y)\,\tha_1(z) =\tha_1(w')\,\tha_1(x')\,\tha_1(y')\,\tha_1(z') +\tha_2(w')\,\tha_2(x')\,\tha_2(y')\,\tha_2(z')\\-\tha_3(w')\,\tha_3(x')\,\tha_3(y')\,\tha_3(z') +\tha_4(w')\,\tha_4(x')\,\tha_4(y')\,\tha_4(z'), \label{33} \end{gathered}\] where \[\begin{split} 2w'=-w+x+y+z,&\qquad 2x'=w-x+y+z,\\ 2y'=\;\;\,w+x-y+z,&\qquad 2z'=w+x+y-z \end{split} \label{37}\] and similar equivalent identities starting with \(\tha_2\), \(\tha_3\) or \(\tha_4\) on the , see §21.22 in, or (21.6.6) and (21.2.9) in Identity [\[33\]](#33){reference-type="eqref" reference="33"} (the oldest one) was first given by Jacobi; this paper is based on notes made by Borchardt of a course of Jacobi which were later annotated by Jacobi. It first entered in Jacobi's lectures of 1835--1836 and he was so excited by the result that he completely changed his approach to elliptic functions, using [\[33\]](#33){reference-type="eqref" reference="33"} as a starting point. Identity [\[32\]](#32){reference-type="eqref" reference="32"} was first obtained by Weierstrass. For the proof he refers to Schwarz (these are edited notes of lectures by Weierstrass). Weierstrass mentions that he first gave this formula in his lectures in 1862. He emphasizes that [\[32\]](#32){reference-type="eqref" reference="32"} is essentially different from Jacobi's formulas [\[33\]](#33){reference-type="eqref" reference="33"} and variants. Some papers in the last decades have attributed these formulas to Riemann, although without reference. Frenkel & Turaev call formula [\[32\]](#32){reference-type="eqref" reference="32"} *Riemann's theta identity*. Some later authors, , also use this terminology or speak about *Riemann's addition formula*. As for [\[33\]](#33){reference-type="eqref" reference="33"}, Mumford, calls it *Riemann's theta relation*. However, I have not been able to find formula [\[32\]](#32){reference-type="eqref" reference="32"} or [\[33\]](#33){reference-type="eqref" reference="33"} in or elsewhere in Riemann's publications. Formula [\[33\]](#33){reference-type="eqref" reference="33"} has a generalization, to theta functions in several variables, which is called a *generalized Riemann theta identity* by Mumford. Weierstrass, gave a generalization of both [\[32\]](#32){reference-type="eqref" reference="32"} and [\[33\]](#33){reference-type="eqref" reference="33"}, respectively, to the several variables case. It is not immediately clear how the results in and are related. The main purpose of this paper is to show in Section [5](#34){reference-type="ref" reference="34"} that [\[32\]](#32){reference-type="eqref" reference="32"} and [\[33\]](#33){reference-type="eqref" reference="33"} easily follow from each other, and therefore can be considered to be equivalent identities. We will work in the notation for theta functions which is now common in work on elliptic hypergeometric series. Its big advantage is that we have only one theta function instead of four different ones, by which lists of formulas can be greatly shrinked. Another feature of this notation is that we work multiplicatively instead of additively. Instead of double (quasi-)periodicity we have quasi-invariance under multiplication of the independent variable by \(q\). This notation is introduced in Section [2](#35){reference-type="ref" reference="35"}. Some variants and applications of the two fundamental formulas are given in Section [3](#38){reference-type="ref" reference="38"}. For completeness the elegant proofs by complex analysis of the two fundamental formulas are recalled in Section [4](#39){reference-type="ref" reference="39"} and some other proofs are mentioned. An Appendix compares some four-term theta identities (mostly extending [\[32\]](#32){reference-type="eqref" reference="32"}). During the revision of an earlier version of this paper my attention was called to work by Wenchang Chu. Apparently unaware of the earlier occurrence of [\[32\]](#32){reference-type="eqref" reference="32"} in the literature he posed it as a problem in the Monthly to prove this formula (as a solution to a functional equation). Several authors gave solutions. One of them, R. J. Chapman, derived [\[32\]](#32){reference-type="eqref" reference="32"} from [\[33\]](#33){reference-type="eqref" reference="33"}, essentially the same proof as my proof in Section [5](#34){reference-type="ref" reference="34"}. Thus the present paper has become even more a survey paper than originally intended. I thank an anonymous referee for corrections of minor errors, for important additional material, and for posing a question which brought me to writing the Appendix. I also thank Bruce Berndt, Hjalmar Rosengren and Michael Schlosser for providing additional references, and Michael Somos for interesting comments. # Preliminaries {#35} Let \(q\) and \(\tau({\rm mod}\;2\ZZ)\) be related by \(q=e^{i\pi\tau}\) and assume that \(0<|q|<1\), or equivalently \(\Im\tau>0\). We will define and notate the *theta function* of *nome* \(q\) as in Gasper & Rahman: \[\begin{aligned} \tha(w)=\tha(w;q)&:=(w,q/w;q)_\iy= \prod_{j=0}^\iy(1-q^jw)(1-q^{j+1}/w)\qquad(w\ne0), \label{1}\\ \tha(w_1,\ldots,w_k)&:=\tha(w_1)\ldots\tha(w_k). \end{aligned}\] By Jacobi's triple product identity we have \[\tha(w;q)=\frac1{(q;q)_\iy}\,\sum_{k=-\iy}^\iy (-1)^k q^{\half k(k-1)}w^k. \label{22}\] Clearly, \[\begin{aligned} \tha(w^{-1};q)&=-w^{-1}\tha(w;q),\label{12}\\ \tha(qw;q)&=-w^{-1}\tha(w;q),\label{14}\\ \tha(q^k w;q)&=(-1)^k q^{-\half k(k-1)} w^{-k}\,\tha(w;q)\qquad(k\in\ZZ). \label{13} \end{aligned}\] The four *Jacobi theta functions* \(\tha_a\) or \(\vartheta_a\) (\(a=1,2,3,4\)), written as \[\tha_a(z)=\tha_a(z,q)=\tha_a(z\mid\tau)=\vartheta_a(\pi z,q) =\vartheta_a(\pi z\mid\tau),\] can all be expressed in terms of the theta function [\[1\]](#1){reference-type="eqref" reference="1"}: \[\begin{aligned} \tha_1(z):=&i\,q^{1/4}(q^2;q^2)_\iy\,e^{-\pi iz}\,\tha(e^{2\pi iz};q^2),\\ \tha_2(z):=&q^{1/4}(q^2;q^2)_\iy\,e^{-\pi iz}\,\tha(-e^{2\pi iz};q^2) =\tha_1(z+\thalf),\\ \tha_3(z):=&(q^2;q^2)_\iy\,\tha(-q\,e^{2\pi iz};q^2) =\sum_{k=-\iy}^\iy q^{k^2}e^{2\pi ikz},\\ \tha_4(z):=&(q^2;q^2)_\iy\,\tha(q\,e^{2\pi iz};q^2)=\tha_3(z+\thalf). \end{aligned}\] Note that \(\tha_1(z)\) is odd in \(z\), while \(\tha_2(z)\), \(\tha_3(z)\) and \(\tha_4(z)\) are even in \(z\). The notation \(\tha_a\) is used in and, while the notation \(\vartheta_a\) is used in. Mumford writes \(\vartheta(z,\tau)\) instead of \(\theta_3(z\mid\tau)\). The first fundamental identity [\[32\]](#32){reference-type="eqref" reference="32"} now takes the form \[yu\,\tha(xy,x/y,vu,v/u)+uv\,\tha(xu,x/u,yv,y/v)+vy\,\tha(xv,x/v,uy,u/y)=0, \label{2}\] or variants by applying [\[12\]](#12){reference-type="eqref" reference="12"}, see . The terms in [\[2\]](#2){reference-type="eqref" reference="2"} are obtained from each other by cyclic permutation in \(y,u,v\). The second fundamental identity [\[33\]](#33){reference-type="eqref" reference="33"} can be rewritten in the notation [\[1\]](#1){reference-type="eqref" reference="1"} as \[\begin{gathered} 2\tha(w^2,x^2,y^2,z^2;q^2)=\tha(w'',x'',y'',z'';q^2)+\tha(-w'',-x'',-y'',-z'';q^2)\\ +q^{-1}xyzw\big(\tha(qw'',qx'',qy'',qz'';q^2)-\tha(-qw'',-qx'',-qy'',-qz'';q^2)\big), \label{16} \end{gathered}\] where \[w''=w^{-1}xyz,\quad x''=wx^{-1}yz,\quad y''=wxy^{-1}z,\quad z''=wxyz^{-1}.\] # Variants and applications of the two fundamental formulas {#38} As already observed in Section [1](#36){reference-type="ref" reference="36"}, Weierstrass wrote [\[32\]](#32){reference-type="eqref" reference="32"} as \[\begin{gathered} \si(u+u_1)\si(u-u_1)\si(u_2+u_3)\si(u_2-u_3) +\si(u+u_2)\si(u-u_2)\si(u_3+u_1)\si(u_3-u_1)\\ +\si(u+u_3)\si(u-u_3)\si(u_1+u_2)\si(u_1-u_2)=0. \label{28} \end{gathered}\] The two formulas [\[32\]](#32){reference-type="eqref" reference="32"} and [\[28\]](#28){reference-type="eqref" reference="28"} are equivalent because by, for periods 1 and \(\tau\), we have \(\si(z)=C\,e^{\eta_1 z^2/2}\,\tha_1(\thalf z\mid\tau)\) with \(C\) and \(\eta_1\) only depending on \(\tau\). For \(v=1\), \(u=-1\) formula [\[2\]](#2){reference-type="eqref" reference="2"} yields (using [\[12\]](#12){reference-type="eqref" reference="12"}): \[\frac{y\,\tha(xy,x/y)}{\tha(x)^2\,\tha(y)^2}=f(y)-f(x),\quad\mbox{where } f(x):=\frac{\tha(-x)^2}{\tha(-1)^2\,\tha(x)^2}\. \label{30}\] Conversely, [\[30\]](#30){reference-type="eqref" reference="30"} implies [\[2\]](#2){reference-type="eqref" reference="2"}, for any choice of the function \(f\). Indeed, after two substitutions from [\[30\]](#30){reference-type="eqref" reference="30"}, the first term of [\[2\]](#2){reference-type="eqref" reference="2"} becomes \(\big(\tha(x)\tha(y)\tha(u)\tha(v)\big)^2\,(f(y)-f(x))(f(u)-f(v))\), which adds up to 0 under cyclic permutation of \(y,u,v\). Weierstrass, according to Schwarz, derived [\[28\]](#28){reference-type="eqref" reference="28"} from the formula: \[\frac{\si(u+v)\si(u-v)}{\si^2(u)\si^2(v)}=\wp(v)-\wp(u), \label{31}\] where \(\wp(z)\) is Weierstrass' elliptic function. By the expression of \(\wp(z)\) in terms of theta functions, [\[31\]](#31){reference-type="eqref" reference="31"} is equivalent to [\[30\]](#30){reference-type="eqref" reference="30"} just as [\[28\]](#28){reference-type="eqref" reference="28"} is equivalent to [\[2\]](#2){reference-type="eqref" reference="2"}. Whittaker & Watson give these results in. Formula [\[31\]](#31){reference-type="eqref" reference="31"} is also given in and. All addition formulas for theta functions in are instances of [\[30\]](#30){reference-type="eqref" reference="30"} or slight variants of it which can be obtained by specialization of [\[2\]](#2){reference-type="eqref" reference="2"}. Some of these formulas are used in the proof that certain actions of the generators of the Sklyanin algebra on the space of meromorphic functions determine a representation of the Sklyanin algebra. Weierstrass observed at the end of his paper that [\[28\]](#28){reference-type="eqref" reference="28"}, as a functional equation for the sigma function, has a general solution given by a power series and still depending on four arbitrary constants. This was finally proved in full rigor by Hurwitz. However, gives earlier references for this result to books by Halphen and by Hermite. A stronger characterization of the sigma function (up to trivial transformations) and its degenerate cases was given by Bonk as continuous solutions \(\tau\colon\RR^n\to\CC\) of the functional equation \[\tau(u+v)\tau(u-v)=f_1(u)g_1(v)+f_2(u)g_2(v),\] where \(f_1,f_2,g_1,g_2\colon\RR^n\to\CC\) are arbitrary. Note that [\[31\]](#31){reference-type="eqref" reference="31"} is of the above form. Elliptic, and in particular theta functions, entered in work on solvable models in statistical mechanics started by Baxter and followed up in papers like, ,. While building on these publications, Frenkel & Turaev in their work on the elliptic \(6j\)-symbol introduced elliptic hypergeometric series. Among others, they obtained the summation formula of the terminating well-poised theta hypergeometric series \({}_{10}V_9(a;b,c,d,e,q^{-n};q,p)\). Formula [\[2\]](#2){reference-type="eqref" reference="2"} occurs as the first non-trivial case \(n=1\) and it also plays a role in the further proof by induction of this summation formula. Closely related to these developments is the introduction of elliptic quantum groups by Felder. Again theta functions play here an important role ,. In formula [\[2\]](#2){reference-type="eqref" reference="2"} is used in connection with the representation theory of the elliptic \(U(2)\) quantum group. If we pass in [\[2\]](#2){reference-type="eqref" reference="2"} to homogeneous coordinates \((a_1,a_2,a_3,b_1,b_2,b_3)\) satisfying \(a_1a_2a_3=b_1b_2b_3\) and expressed in terms of \(x,y,u,v\) by \[a_1=b_3xu,\; a_2=b_3xy,\; a_3=b_3xv,\; b_1=b_3x^2,\; b_2=b_3xyuv,\] then, after repeated application of [\[12\]](#12){reference-type="eqref" reference="12"}, we obtain another symmetric version of [\[2\]](#2){reference-type="eqref" reference="2"}: \[\frac{\tha(a_1/b_1,a_1/b_2,a_1/b_3)}{\tha(a_1/a_2,a_1/a_3)} +\frac{\tha(a_2/b_1,a_2/b_2,a_2/b_3)}{\tha(a_2/a_3,a_2/a_1)} +\frac{\tha(a_3/b_1,a_3/b_2,a_3/b_3)}{\tha(a_3/a_1,a_3/a_2)}=0\quad (a_1a_2a_3=b_1b_2b_3). \label{29}\] Formula [\[29\]](#29){reference-type="eqref" reference="29"} has an \(n\)-term generalization which is associated with root system \(A_{n-1}\): \[\sum_{k=1}^n\frac{\prod_{j=1}^n \tha(a_k/b_j)}{\prod_{j\ne k}\tha(a_k/a_j)}=0\quad (a_1\ldots a_n=b_1\ldots b_n), \label{41}\] see, , ,. The formula is given in terms of \(\si(z)\) in. Rosengren traced the formula back to Tannery and Molk. Another \(n\)-term generalization, which reduces for \(n=3\) to [\[2\]](#2){reference-type="eqref" reference="2"} after application of [\[12\]](#12){reference-type="eqref" reference="12"}, is associated with root system \(D_{n-1}\), see, ,. More complicated many-term identities of theta products are given by Kajihara & Noumi and by Langer, Schlosser & Warnaar. Of particular interest are the four-term cases of the above identities. Quite some four-term theta identities can be found on scattered places in literature, and they also arise as special cases of some identities in. One may wonder if some of these identities are essentially the same (a question asked by a referee). In one important case the answer will be negative, see the Appendix. Various proofs and applications of [\[2\]](#2){reference-type="eqref" reference="2"} were given in, ,. Schlosser observed that [\[2\]](#2){reference-type="eqref" reference="2"} pops up in connection with a telescoping property of the special case \(e=a^2/(bcd)\) of Bailey's \({}_6\psi_6\) summation formula. This was converted into a proof of [\[2\]](#2){reference-type="eqref" reference="2"} by Chu. In formula [\[2\]](#2){reference-type="eqref" reference="2"} is used in the proof of a determinant evaluation associated to the affine root system of type \(C\). In a \(3\times 3\) determinant with theta function entries is evaluated, thus solving an open problem in. The determinant evaluation has [\[2\]](#2){reference-type="eqref" reference="2"} as a special case. In the so-called quintuple product identity is derived from [\[2\]](#2){reference-type="eqref" reference="2"}. The second fundamental formula [\[33\]](#33){reference-type="eqref" reference="33"} and its variants can be written in a very compact form by using the notation (cf. [\[37\]](#37){reference-type="eqref" reference="37"}) \[[a]:=\tha_a(w)\tha_a(x)\tha_a(y)\tha_a(z),\quad [a]':=\tha_a(w')\tha_a(x')\tha_a(y')\tha_a(z').\] Then (the first one implies the others): \[\begin{split} 2\,[1]=\;\;\,\,[1]'+[2]'-[3]'+[4]',&\quad 2\,[2]=[1]'+[2]'+[3]'-[4]',\\ 2\,[3]=-[1]'+[2]'+[3]'+[4]',&\quad 2\,[4]=[1]'-[2]'+[3]'+[4]'. \end{split} \label{4}\] These are easily seen to be equivalent with: \[\begin{split} [1]+[2]&=[1]'+[2]',\quad[1]+[3]=[2]'+[4]',\quad[1]+[4]=[1]'+[4]',\\ [1]-[2]&=[4]'-[3]',\quad[1]-[3]=[1]'-[3]',\quad[1]-[4]=[2]'-[3]'. \end{split} \label{3}\] Jacobi first obtained [\[3\]](#3){reference-type="eqref" reference="3"} and then derived [\[4\]](#4){reference-type="eqref" reference="4"} from it. For \(x=y=z=w\) [\[33\]](#33){reference-type="eqref" reference="33"} implies \[\tha_1(z)^4+\tha_3(z)^4=\tha_2(z)^4+\tha_4(z)^4.\] The computation of the action of the Casimir operators in the representation of the Sklyanin algebra uses [\[4\]](#4){reference-type="eqref" reference="4"}. # Proofs of the fundamental theta relations {#39} For completeness I recall here the short and elegant complex analysis proofs of the fundamental theta relations [\[2\]](#2){reference-type="eqref" reference="2"} and [\[16\]](#16){reference-type="eqref" reference="16"}. (Baxter, see also ).\ Consider the theta functions in [\[2\]](#2){reference-type="eqref" reference="2"} with nome \(q^2\). For fixed \(y,u,v\) we have to prove that \[F(x):=\frac{yv^{-1}\,\tha(xy,x/y,vu,v/u;q^2)+yu^{-1}\,\tha(xv,x/v,uy,u/y;q^2)} {\tha(xu,x/u,yv,y/v;q^2)}\] is equal to \(-1\). For generic values of \(y,u,v\) \(F(x)\) is a meromorphic function of \(x\) on \(\CC\backslash\{0\}\). Then the numerator vanishes at all (generically simple) zeros \(x=q^{2k} u^{\pm1}\) (\(k\in\ZZ\)) of the denominator. Indeed, for these values of \(x\) the numerator equals \[\begin{aligned} &yv^{-1}\,\tha(q^{2k} u^{\pm1}y,q^{2k} u^{\pm1}y^{-1},vu,vu^{-1};q^2) +yu^{-1}\,\tha(q^{2k}u^{\pm1}v,q^{2k} u^{\pm1}v^{-1},uy,uy^{-1};q^2)\\ &=q^{-2k(k-1)}u^{\mp2k}\big(yv^{-1} \tha(u^{\pm1}y,u^{\pm1}y^{-1},vu,vu^{-1};q^2) +yu^{-1}\,\tha(u^{\pm1}v,u^{\pm1}v^{-1},uy,uy^{-1};q^2)\big)=0, \end{aligned}\] where we used [\[13\]](#13){reference-type="eqref" reference="13"} and [\[12\]](#12){reference-type="eqref" reference="12"}. Thus \(F\) is analytic in \(x\) on \(\CC\backslash\{0\}\). Furthermore, \(F(q^2x)=F(x)\) by [\[14\]](#14){reference-type="eqref" reference="14"}. Hence \(F\) is bounded. Thus the singularity of \(F\) at \(0\) is removable and, by Liouville's theorem, \(F\) is constant. Now check that \(F(v)=-1\) by [\[12\]](#12){reference-type="eqref" reference="12"}.0◻Whittaker & Watson obtain [\[2\]](#2){reference-type="eqref" reference="2"} from [\[31\]](#31){reference-type="eqref" reference="31"}. They suggest a proof of [\[31\]](#31){reference-type="eqref" reference="31"} by comparing zeros and poles of elliptic functions on both sides. Liu proves [\[2\]](#2){reference-type="eqref" reference="2"} by using a kind of generalized addition formula for \(\tha_1\). Bailey gives a more computational proof of [\[2\]](#2){reference-type="eqref" reference="2"}. Among others he derives a three-term identity for very well-poised \({}_8\phi_7\) series, which Gasper & Rahman write in elegant symmetric form. By formula [\[2\]](#2){reference-type="eqref" reference="2"} then should follow from this three-term identity. Indeed, reduce it to a three-term identity of very well-poised \({}_6\phi_5\) series which are summable by. See also. Schlosser points out that [\[2\]](#2){reference-type="eqref" reference="2"} is also the special case \(b=1\) of (put \(a=qxv\), \(c=xy\), \(d=qx/y\), \(e=qvu\), \(f=qv/u\) and use [\[12\]](#12){reference-type="eqref" reference="12"} and [\[14\]](#14){reference-type="eqref" reference="14"}). (Whittaker & Watson ).\ Divide the  by the  and consider the resulting expression as a meromorphic function \(F(w)\) of \(w\) on \(\CC\backslash\{0\}\) (the other variables generically fixed) with possible simple poles at the zeros \(\pm q^k\) (\(k\in\ZZ\)) of \(\tha(w^2;q^2)\). Since \(F(w)=F(-w)\) we can write \(F(w)=G(w^2)\), where \(G\) is a meromorphic function on \(\CC\backslash\{0\}\) with possible simple poles at \(q^{2k}\) (\(k\in\ZZ\)). We have \(F(qw)=F(w)\) because, by [\[14\]](#14){reference-type="eqref" reference="14"}, \[\begin{aligned} \frac{\tha(\pm q^{-1}w'';q^2)}{\tha(q^2w^2;q^2)}&= \frac{\pm q^{-1}xyzw\,\tha(\pm qw'';q^2)}{\tha(w^2;q^2)}\,,\\ \frac{\pm xyzw\,\tha(\pm q^2x'',\pm q^2y'',\pm q^2z'';q^2)}{\tha(q^2w^2;q^2)}&= \frac{\tha(\pm x'',\pm y'',\pm z'';q^2)}{\tha(w^2;q^2)}\. \end{aligned}\] Hence \(G(q^2u)=G(u)\). But then \[2\pi i\,{\rm Res}_{u=q^{2k}} \big(u^{-1} G(u)\big) =\int_{|u|=|q|^{2k-1}} G(u)\,\frac{du}u-\int_{|u|=|q|^{2k+1}} G(u)\,\frac{du}u=0.\] Hence \(G\) has no poles and similarly for \(F\). Similarly as in the previous proof we conclude that \(F\) is constant in \(w\). By symmetry, \(F\) is also constant in \(x\), \(y\) and \(z\). Thus we have shown that \[\begin{gathered} A\,\tha(w^2,x^2,y^2,z^2;q^2)=\tha(w'',x'',y'',z'';q^2)+\tha(-w'',-x'',-y'',-z'';q^2)\\ +q^{-1}xyzw\big(\tha(qw'',qx'',qy'',qz'';q^2)-\tha(-qw'',-qx'',-qy'',-qz'';q^2)\big), \label{18} \end{gathered}\] for some constant \(A\). Put in [\[18\]](#18){reference-type="eqref" reference="18"} \(w=x=q^\half\) and \(y=z=iq\). Then \(w''=x''=-q^2\) and \(y''=z''=q\) and \[A\,\tha(q,q,-q^2,-q^2;q^2)= \tha(q,q,-q^2,-q^2;q^2)+q^2\,\tha(q^3,q^3,-q^2,-q^2;q^2).\] Hence \(A=2\) by [\[14\]](#14){reference-type="eqref" reference="14"}.0◻The last part of this proof is a slight improvement compared to. There it is first proved in (again by the same method) that \[\tha(q;q^2)^2\,\tha(qz;q^2)^2=\tha(-q;q^2)^2\,\tha(-qz;q^2)^2-qz\,\tha(-q^2;q^2)^2\,\tha(-q^2z;q^2)^2, \label{20}\] and hence, by putting \(z=1\), \[\tha(q;q^2)^4=\tha(-q;q^2)^4-q\,\tha(-q^2;q^2)^4. \label{21}\] Then the value of \(A\) in the above proof is obtained by putting \(w=x=y=z=q^\half\) in [\[18\]](#18){reference-type="eqref" reference="18"} and comparing with [\[21\]](#21){reference-type="eqref" reference="21"}. Note that [\[20\]](#20){reference-type="eqref" reference="20"} and [\[21\]](#21){reference-type="eqref" reference="21"} are special cases of [\[16\]](#16){reference-type="eqref" reference="16"}. Another special case of [\[16\]](#16){reference-type="eqref" reference="16"}, only leaving two terms nonzero, was suggested by a referee: \[(w,x,y,z):=(i/z,q^{-1/2}/z,-iq^{1/2}/z,z).\quad\mbox{Then}\quad (w'',x'',y'',z'')=(-1,q,-q^{-1},z^{-4}).\] Then [\[16\]](#16){reference-type="eqref" reference="16"} degenerates to \[2\tha(-z^{-2},q^{-1}z^{-2},-qz^{-2},z^2;q^2)=\tha(-1,q,-q^{-1},z^{-4};q^2). \label{40}\] This can be independently proved by [\[1\]](#1){reference-type="eqref" reference="1"} together with repeated use of the standard identities \[(a,qa;q^2)_\iy=(a;q)_\iy\quad\mbox{and}\quad(a,-a;q)_\iy=(a^2;q^2)_\iy.\] Of course, [\[40\]](#40){reference-type="eqref" reference="40"} can also be used to settle that \(A=2\) in [\[18\]](#18){reference-type="eqref" reference="18"}. In Jacobi and in Mumford a different proof of [\[16\]](#16){reference-type="eqref" reference="16"} is given. It uses [\[22\]](#22){reference-type="eqref" reference="22"}. If we compare our proofs of [\[2\]](#2){reference-type="eqref" reference="2"} and [\[16\]](#16){reference-type="eqref" reference="16"} given above with each other then we see that in the proof of [\[2\]](#2){reference-type="eqref" reference="2"} it is not automatic that the possible simple poles have residue zero because there are two simple poles in each annulus to be considered. So we have to check there by computation that the numerator of \(F(z)\) vanishes whenever the denominator vanishes. # Equivalence of the two fundamental theta relations {#34} Let us rewrite the first fundamental theta relation [\[2\]](#2){reference-type="eqref" reference="2"} as \(F_1(x,y,u,v;q)=0\), where \[F_1(x,y,u,v;q):= \tha(xy,x/y,uv,u/v;q^2)-\tha(xv,x/v,uy,u/y;q^2)-uy^{-1}\tha(yv,y/v,xu,x/u;q^2). \label{24}\] In the second fundamental theta relation [\[16\]](#16){reference-type="eqref" reference="16"} both sides are invariant under each of the transformations of variable \(w\to-w\), \(x\to-x\), \(y\to-y\), \(z\to-z\). Therefore we obtain an equivalent identity if we replace in [\[16\]](#16){reference-type="eqref" reference="16"} \((w^2,x^2,y^2,z^2)\) by \((xy,x/y,uv,u/v)\). Thus we can write [\[16\]](#16){reference-type="eqref" reference="16"} equivalently, in a form closer to [\[24\]](#24){reference-type="eqref" reference="24"}, as \(F_2(x,y,u,v;q)=0\), where \[\begin{gathered} F_2(x,y,u,v;q)\\:=2\tha(xy,x/y,uv,u/v;q^2)-\tha(xv,x/v,uy,u/y;q^2)-\tha(-xv,-x/v,-uy,-u/y;q^2)\\-q^{-1}xu\big(\tha(qxv,qx/v,quy,qu/y;q^2)-\tha(-qxv,-qx/v,-quy,-qu/y;q^2)\big). \label{5} \end{gathered}\] For the proof of [\[23\]](#23){reference-type="eqref" reference="23"} substitute [\[24\]](#24){reference-type="eqref" reference="24"} in the  of [\[23\]](#23){reference-type="eqref" reference="23"}. Then this  becomes \[\begin{aligned} &\tha(xy,x/y,uv,u/v;q^2)-xy\,\tha(q^2xy,x/y,uv,u/v;q^2)\\ &+\tha(-xy,-x/y,-uv,-u/v;q^2)-xy\,\tha(-q^2xy,-x/y,-uv,-u/v;q^2)\\ &-\tha(xv,x/v,uy,u/y;q^2)-\tha(-xv,-x/v,-uy,-u/y;q^2)\\ &+xy\big(\tha(qxv,qx/v,quy,q^{-1}u/y;q^2)+\tha(-qxv,-qx/v,-quy,-q^{-1}u/y;q^2)\big), \end{aligned}\] which equals the  of [\[23\]](#23){reference-type="eqref" reference="23"} because of [\[14\]](#14){reference-type="eqref" reference="14"} and [\[5\]](#5){reference-type="eqref" reference="5"}. For the proof of [\[25\]](#25){reference-type="eqref" reference="25"} substitute [\[5\]](#5){reference-type="eqref" reference="5"} in the  of [\[25\]](#25){reference-type="eqref" reference="25"}. Then \[\begin{aligned} &2\tha(xy,x/y,uv,u/v;q^2)-2uy^{-1}\,\tha(xu,x/u,yv,y/v;q^2)\\ &-\tha(xv,x/v,uy,u/y;q^2)+uy^{-1}\,\tha(xv,x/v,uy,y/u;q^2)\\ &-\tha(-xv,-x/v,-uy,-u/y;q^2)+uy^{-1}\,\tha(-xv,-x/v,-uy,-y/u;q^2)\\ &-q^{-1}xu\big(\tha(qxv,qx/v,quy,qu/y;q^2)-\tha(qxv,qx/v,quy,qy/u;q^2)\big)\\ &+q^{-1}xu\big(\tha(-qxv,-qx/v,-quy,-qu/y;q^2)-\tha(-qxv,-qx/v,-quy,-qy/u;q^2)\big), \end{aligned}\] which equals the  of [\[25\]](#25){reference-type="eqref" reference="25"} because of [\[12\]](#12){reference-type="eqref" reference="12"}, [\[14\]](#14){reference-type="eqref" reference="14"} and [\[24\]](#24){reference-type="eqref" reference="24"}.0◻One half of the equivalence proof, i.e., essentially [\[25\]](#25){reference-type="eqref" reference="25"}, has been given before by R. J. Chapman.

{'timestamp': '2014-09-19T02:11:13', 'yymm': '1401', 'arxiv_id': '1401.5368', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5368'}

# Introduction Throughout, \((R,\fm,k)\) is a commutative Noetherian local ring. The New Intersection Theorem is one of the most important results in local algebra. It provides simple proofs for several outstanding homological conjectures e.g. Auslander's zero-divisor conjecture and Bass' conjecture. The New Intersection Theorem was proved in prime characteristic by Peskine and Szpiro in 1973. Then Hochster's works, established a reduction to prime characteristic from equicharacteristic zero to give a proof of this theorem in all equicharacteristic rings in 1975. Finally, in 1987, Roberts proved the New Intersection Theorem for mixed characteristic rings by using local Chern characters. The New Intersection Theorem asserts that if \[0\lo F_s\lo F_{s-1}\lo \cdots \lo F_1\lo F_0\lo 0\] is a non-exact complex of finitely generated free \(R\)-modules with finite length homology modules, then \(\dim R\leq s\). Using the New Intersection Theorem, one can easily see that if \(R\) admits a nonzero Cohen- Macaulay module with \(\pd_RM<\infty\), then \(R\) must be Cohen-Macaulay. Another implication of the New Intersection Theorem is the Intersection Inequality which says that for any two nonzero finitely generated \(R\)-modules \(M\) and \(N\) if \(\pd_RM<\infty\), then \[\dim_RN \leq \pd_RM+\dim_R(M\otimes_RN).\] The New Intersection Theorem has another equivalent form which asserts that if \[0\lo I_0\lo I_{-1}\lo \cdots\lo I_{-s}\lo 0\] is a non-exact complex of injective \(R\)-modules with finitely generated homology modules, then \(\dim R\leq s\); see e.g.. Using this, one can easily verify Bass' Theorem to the effect that if \(R\) admits a nonzero finitely generated module of finite injective dimension, then \(R\) is Cohen-Macaulay. Since many results in classical homological algebra have counterparts in Gorenstein homological algebra, the following questions are raised naturally: Question 1.3 was asked in, and. This question has been studied by many authors; see e.g., , and. Our investigation on this question was initiated by. As we mentioned above, in the proof of the Intersection Inequality, the New Intersection Theorem was used. By the answer of Question 1.2 is not positive in general. Hence, one may think that the answer of Question 1.1 is negative, and so it was not asked before. In contrary, we strongly believe that the answer of Question 1.1 is affirmative. It is straightforward to see that an affirmative answer to the second part of Question 1.1 implies an affirmative answer to its first part. Also, note that Question 1.1 easily implies Question 1.3. This paper is concerned with the study of the above questions. We show that if either \(R\) is Cohen-Macaulay or \(R\) possesses an \(R\)-module \(B\) such that \(\depth_RB<\infty\) and \(\depth_R(B\otimes_RT)\geq \dim R\) for all totally reflexive \(R\)-modules \(T\), then the answer of Question 1.1 i) is positive; see Theorem 3.3 below. Also, we prove that if either \(R\) is Cohen-Macaulay or \(R\) possesses an \(R\)-module \(B\) such that \(\width_RB<\infty\) and \(\width_R(\Hom_R(B,T))\geq \dim R\) for all Gorenstein injective \(R\)-modules \(T\), then the answers of Question 1.1 ii) is positive; see Theorem 3.4 below. By assuming that Question 1.1 i) has an affirmative answer and imposing some extra assumptions on \(M\) and \(N\), we provide a positive answer to Question 1.2; see Corollary 4.2 below. We show that if there exists a big Cohen-Macaulay \(R\)-module \(B\) such that \(\Tor_1^R(B,T)=0\) for all totally reflexive \(R\)-modules \(T\), then the answers of Question 1.3 i) is positive; see Theorem 4.3 below. Also, we prove that if exists a big Cohen-Macaulay \(R\)-module \(B\) such that \(\Ext^{1}_R(B,T)=0\) for all Gorenstein injective \(R\)-modules \(T\), then the answers of Question 1.3 ii) is positive; see Theorem 4.5 below. # Prerequisites Throughout this paper, \((R,\fm,k)\) is a commutative Noetherian local ring with nonzero identity. The \(\fm\)-adic completion of an \(R\)-module \(M\), will be denoted by \(\widehat{M}\) and "complete\" stands for "\(\fm\)-adic complete\". **(2.1) Hyperhomology.** As we will use technical side of hyperhomology and derived category of \(R\)-modules, \(\mathcal{D}(R)\), we recall some necessary information and notations which are needed in this paper. The objects in \(\mathcal{D}(R)\) are complexes of \(R\)-modules and symbol \(\simeq\) denotes isomorphisms in this category. For a complex \[X=\cdots \lo X_{n+1} \overset{{\partial}_{n+1}^X}\lo X_n \overset{{\partial}_n^X}\lo X_{n-1}\lo \cdots\] in \(\mathcal{D}(R)\), its supremum and infimum are defined respectively by \(\sup X:=\sup \{i\in \mathbb{Z}|H_i(X)\neq 0\}\) and \(\inf X:=\inf \{i\in \mathbb{Z}|H_i(X)\neq 0\}\), with the usual convention that \(\sup \emptyset=-\infty\) and \(\inf \emptyset=\infty\). A complex \(X\) is said to be non-exact if it has some nonzero homology modules. The full subcategory of homologically bounded to the right (resp. left) complexes is denoted by \(\mathcal{D}_{\sqsupset}(R)\) (resp. \(\mathcal{D}_{\sqsubset}(R)\)). Also, the full subcategories of homologically bounded complexes and of complexes with finitely generated homology modules will be denoted by \(\mathcal{D}_{\Box}(R)\) and \(\mathcal{D}^f(R)\), respectively. Modules can be considered as complexes concentrated in degree zero. The full subcategory of homologically bounded complexes with finitely generated homology modules will be denoted by \(\mathcal{D}_{\Box}^f(R)\). For any complex \(X\) in \(\mathcal{D}_{\sqsupset}(R)\) (resp. \(\mathcal{D}_{\sqsubset}(R)\)), there is a bounded to the right (resp. left) complex \(P\) (resp. \(I\)) of projective (resp. injective) \(R\)-modules which is isomorphic to \(X\) in \(\mathcal{D}(R)\). A such complex \(P\) (resp. \(I\)) is called a projective (resp. injective) resolution of \(X\). By using these resolutions, one can compute derived functors in \(\mathcal{D}(R)\). The left derived tensor product functor \(-\otimes_R^{{\bf L}}\sim\) is computed by taking a projective resolution of the first argument or of the second one. The right derived homomorphism functor \({\bf R}\Hom_R(-,\sim)\) is computed by taking a projective resolution of the first argument or by taking an injective resolution of the second one. For any convenient two complexes \(X,Y\) and any integer \(i\), set \(\Tor_i^R(X,Y):=H_i(X\otimes_R^{{\bf L}}Y)\) and \(\Ext_R^i(X,Y):=H_{-i}({\bf R}\Hom_R(X,Y))\). Assume that \(X\in \mathcal{D}_{\sqsubset}(R)\) and \(Y\in \mathcal{D}_{\sqsupset}(R)\). The notions \(\depth_RX\) and \(\width_RY\) are defined, respectively, by \(\depth_RX:=-\sup {\bf R}\Hom_R(k,X)\) and \(\width_RY:= \inf (k\otimes_R^{\bf L}Y)\). If \(X\in \mathcal{D}_{\Box}(R)\), yields that \(\depth_RX\) is finite if and only if \(\width_RX\) is finite. If \(X\in \mathcal{D}^{f}_{\Box}(R)\), then \(\width_RX=\inf X\) and \(\depth_RX\) is finite if and only if \(X\) is non-exact; see respectively and. Also, for any \(X\in \mathcal{D}(R)\), \(\dim_RX\) and \(\Supp_RX\) are defined by \(\dim_RX:=\sup\{\dim R/\fp-\inf X_{\fp}| \fp\in \Spec R\}\) and \(\Supp_RX:=\{\fp\in \Spec R|X_{\fp}\not\simeq 0\}\). **(2.2) Gorenstein homological dimensions.** A finitely generated \(R\)-module \(M\) is said to be *totally reflexive* if there exists an exact complex \(F\) of finitely generated free \(R\)-modules such that \(M\cong \im(F_0\lo F_{-1})\) and \(\Hom_R(F,R)\) is exact. Obviously, any finitely generated projective module is totally reflexive. Also, an \(R\)-module \(N\) is said to be *Gorenstein injective* if there exists an exact complex \(I\) of injective \(R\)-modules such that \(N\cong \im(I_1\lo I_0)\) and \(\Hom_R(E,I)\) is exact for all injective \(R\)-modules \(E\). Clearly, any injective module is Gorenstein injective. For a complex \(X\in \mathcal{D}^{f}_{\sqsupset}(R)\), G-dimension of \(X\) is defined by \[\begin{array}{llll}\Gdim_RX&:=\inf\{\sup\{l\in \mathbb{Z}|Q_l\neq 0\}|Q \ \ \text{is a bounded to the right complex of} \\ &\text{totally reflexive R-modules such that} \ Q\simeq X \}. \end{array}\] Also, for a complex \(Y\in \mathcal{D}_{\sqsubset}(R)\), its Gorenstein injective dimension is defined by \[\begin{array}{llll}\Gid_RY&:=\inf\{\sup\{l\in \mathbb{Z}|E_{-l}\neq 0\}|E \ \ \text{is a bounded to the left complex of} \\ &\text{Gorenstein injective R-modules such that} \ Y\simeq E \}. \end{array}\] # The Main Results We start this section with the following lemma which states the Auslander-Buchsbaum and Bass formulas for Gorenstein homological dimensions. Recall that for an ideal \(I\) of \(R\), an \(R\)-module \(M\) is said to be \(I\)-*torsion* if each element of \(M\) is annihilated by some power of \(I\). The following result is one of the main results of this paper. It provides some partial answers to Question 1.1 i). Before presenting it, we recall the Right Acyclicity Lemma for the right connected sequence of functors \(\Ext_R^{i}(k,\cdot)\) and the Left Acyclicity Lemma for the left connected sequence of functors \(\Tor_i^R(k,\cdot)\). Let \[Y:=0\lo Y_{s}\lo Y_{s-1}\lo \cdots \lo Y_1\lo Y_0\] be a complex of \(R\)-modules such that for each \(i=1,\ldots, s\), both \(\depth Y_i\geq i\) and either \(H_i(Y)=0\) or \(\depth_RH_i(Y)=0\). Then the Right Acyclicity Lemma asserts that \(Y\) is exact. Now, let \[X:=X_{0}\lo X_{-1}\lo \cdots \lo X_{-s+1}\lo X_{-s}\lo 0\] be a complex of \(R\)-modules such that for each \(i=1,\ldots, s\), both \(\width_RX_{-i}\geq i\) and either \(H_{-i}(X)=0\) or \(\width_RH_{-i}(X)=0\). Then the Left Acyclicity Lemma asserts that \(X\) is exact. In the next result, we present a partial answer to Question 1.1 ii). It also provides a dual of Theorem 3.3. Now, we provide big Cohen-Macaulay \(R\)-modules satisfy the assumptions of Theorems 3.3 i) and 3.4 i). Recall that an \(R\)-module \(B\) is called *big Cohen-Macaulay* if there exists a system of parameters \(x:=x_{1},\ldots, x_{n}\) such that \(x\) is a \(B\)-regular sequence. Hochster has proved that if \(R\) is equicharacteristic (i.e. \(R\) and \(k\) have the same characteristic), then it admits a big Cohen-Macaulay module. # Applications We begin this section by showing that the Gorenstein analogue of the New Intersection Theorem implies the Gorenstein analogue of the Intersection Inequality in a special case. Now, as an application of Theorem 3.3 i), we give a partial answer to Question 1.3 i). We recall that every local ring containing a field has a big Cohen-Macaulay module. The following example shows that the conditions of Theorem 4.3 are not equivalent in general. We end this paper by the following result which gives a partial answer to Question 1.3 ii).

{'timestamp': '2014-01-23T02:10:29', 'yymm': '1401', 'arxiv_id': '1401.5716', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5716'}

# Introduction Tracing out the star-formation history of the universe is a key ingredient for our understanding of the mass assembly of galaxies. Great progress has been made in the last decade or so based on deep imaging surveys both from the ground and from space with the Hubble Space Telescope (*HST*). These have led to the very efficient identification of several thousand star-forming galaxies at \(z\geq4\) based on broad-band imaging, using the Lyman break selection technique. Thanks to the combination of *HST* and *Spitzer*/IRAC imaging, the analysis of these galaxies was further extended from rest-frame UV only studies to include the rest-frame optical, leading to reliable estimates of the stellar mass functions of very faint galaxies out to \(z\sim7-8\). Since some of the strongest emission lines such as H\(\alpha\) or \[\]\(\lambda\)`<!-- -->`{=html}5007 are shifted into the observed-frame near-infrared at \(z\gtrsim2\), progress on spectroscopic confirmation and observation of rest-frame optical lines was very slow and time consuming. However, with the advent of efficient multi-object near-infrared spectrographs on 8m-class telescopes, this situation is now changing. In this paper we present an analysis of \[\] and H\(\beta\) emission lines of a sample of \(z\sim3.5\) galaxies based on observations with the Keck MOSFIRE instrument. The strength of such lines is very important as they can provide key insight into the conditions of star-formation in high-redshift sources, and when combined with additional line measurements such as \[\] can provide an estimate of the gas-phase metallicity of \(z\sim3-4\) galaxies. There is now growing evidence for a high fraction of galaxies showing strong nebular line emission at \(z\sim4-8\), with median rest-frame equivalent widths (EW\(_0\)) of \(\gtrsim300\) Å[e.g., @stark2013; @debarros2012; @schaerer2009]. From a sample of 74 isolated galaxies with deep \(Spitzer\)/IRAC photometry and with spectroscopic redshifts in the range \(3.8<z<5.0\), find that 65% show clear flux excess in IRAC \[3.6\], indicative of strong H\(\alpha\) emission. From this excess in the broad-band photometry, they estimate rest-frame equivalent widths in the range \(140-1700\) Å. In a similar analysis, derive the EW(H\(\alpha\)) distribution at this redshift, finding a mean value of 270 Å. find a similar flux excess in the median stacked SEDs of galaxies at \(z\sim5,~6,\) and 7 [see also @labbe2012; @smit13]. This excess suggests that \[OIII\] and H\(\beta\) also have large rest-frame EWs and that strong emission lines may be ubiquitous over a range of masses (\(M=10^9\mbox{--}10^{10}\) M\(_\odot\)). Most recently, used a sample of 20 Lyman Break galaxies (LBGs) to spectroscopically confirm that the majority of \(z\sim3.5\) galaxies have strong \[\] equivalent widths in agreement with the H\(\alpha\) equivalent width distribution based on the broad-band IRAC photometry. In the local universe, galaxies with extreme emission lines have been identified from SDSS based on extremely blue \(r-i\) colors because the \(r\)-band is dominated by the \[OIII\] line. Such low-metallicity starbursts only contribute a small fraction of the total star-formation at \(z<1\). At higher redshift, \(z\sim1.7\), similar observations based on extreme broad band colors have revealed a significant population of galaxies that are undergoing vigorous star-formation episodes. This is indicated by their large \[OIII\] + H\(\beta\) EWs \(\sim 1000\,\)Å, that imply that they can build their whole stellar mass in only 15 Myr. Similarly strong line emitters have independently been found even up to \(z\sim2.3\) from WFC3/IR grism spectroscopy. At these higher redshifts, the number density of such sources is found to be quite significant (\(\sim4\times10^{-4}\) Mpc\(^{-3}\)). These strong emission lines point to unusual properties in the high redshift star-forming population. As an example, one can consider the Lynx arc, which in many ways is a prototypical galaxy at high redshift with unusual properties. studied this object with deep, high quality spectra across the rest-frame UV and optical. The galaxy shows strong ionization, such that the \[\] line is not detected despite the detection of the \[\] at 3869 Å. To reproduce these line strengths and ratios, a cluster of \(\sim10^{5}\) stars with surface temperatures of 80,000 K is required. It appears, however, that such objects are common at z\(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}2 requiring different interstellar medium properties than we see in the local universe, potentially with significantly higher ionized gas densities. Recent theoretical models can reproduce such line ratios, but they require very different ionization parameters, strong winds, radiation pressure or significant shocks. In this paper, we probe the star-formation properties of a sample of \(z\sim3.5\) star-forming galaxies with the use of Keck MOSFIRE multi-object near-infrared spectroscopy to target the \[\] and H\(\beta\) lines with a single mask observation in the GOODS-South field. The paper is organized as follows: in Section [2](#sec:selection){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:selection"}, we present our target selection, before describing our observations in Section [3](#sec:obs){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:obs"}, and outlining our analysis in Section [4](#sec:analysis){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:analysis"}. Finally, we end with the presentation and a discussion of our results in Section [5](#sec:results){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:results"}. Throughout this paper, we adopt AB magnitudes and a standard cosmology with \(\Omega_M=0.3, \Omega_\Lambda=0.7\), and \(H_0=70\) km s\(^{-1}\)Mpc\(^{-1}\). # Target Selection and Photometric Data {#sec:selection} Our primary goal is to investigate the rest-frame optical emission line properties of Lyman break selected, star-forming galaxies at \(z\sim3.5\). The GOODS-South field offers the best combination of multi-wavelength imaging data both from the ground and from space with HST and Spitzer, as well as a large sample of spectroscopically confirmed LBGs in the required redshift range based on the large campaign of rest-frame UV spectra. ## Pre-Existing Spectroscopic Sample The primary emission lines of our study are H\(\beta\) and the \[\]\(\lambda\lambda\)`<!-- -->`{=html}4959,5007 doublet. These lines are accessible in the \(K\) band over the redshift range \(3.2 < z < 3.8\). To increase the efficiency of our observations, we prioritized galaxies with existing spectroscopic redshifts such that their H\(\beta\) and \[\] lines would fall in between the many strong night sky lines. To do this, we used the spectroscopic catalogs of GOODS-South compiled by and who observed large samples of LBGs in this redshift range. We identified an overdensity of galaxies in the South-West part of GOODS-South with existing spectroscopic redshifts for which our target lines would lie in between sky lines, and we thus chose to center our mask design around that apparent overdensity. We designed the mask to maximize the number of galaxies with known redshifts and were able to fit 15 into our design. The rest-frame UV spectra of these galaxies show Lyman \(\alpha\) in emission in 8 of the 15 galaxies, with measured equivalent widths ranging from 4 to 72 Å [measured form the spectra of @balestra2010; @vanzella2008]. In addition to the spectroscopically confirmed sample, we included nine \(B_{435}\) dropout galaxies without pre-existing rest-frame UV redshift measurements as secondary targets. Since our input spectroscopic redshift samples are based on rest-frame UV spectra, we are selecting galaxies bright in the rest-frame UV, typically brighter than \(i_{775}<25\) mag AB. These magnitudes imply star-formation rates of \(\gtrsim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}10 \({\rm M_{\odot}\ yr^{-1}}\) which should yield solid detections for H\(\beta\) (signal to noise \(>\)`<!-- -->`{=html}7) in a 3 to 4 hour exposure with the MOSFIRE spectrograph. The filler galaxies were in general much fainter than the spectroscopic input sample. The final mask design included 24 high-redshift targets, in addition to one star for measuring the Telluric absorption. ## Imaging Data and Photometry All our targets are covered by multi-wavelength imaging data from HST. We use our own reduction of the GOODS-South ACS data, which includes additional follow-up observations and is therefore somewhat deeper than the publicly available v2.0 images, reaching to \(i_{775} = 28.2\) mag AB (5\(\sigma\) measured in small circular apertures of 0 diameter). Additionally, we reduced all the WFC3/IR data from the complete CANDELS GOODS-South imaging program [PI: Faber/Ferguson; @grogin2011; @koekemoer2011], reaching a varying depth of \(H_{160} = 27.5-28.3\) mag AB. All our sources are \(>1\) mag brighter than these limits, and therefore seen at high significance in these images (see Figures [\[Bstamps\]](#Bstamps){reference-type="ref" reference="Bstamps"}, [\[Bstamps2\]](#Bstamps2){reference-type="ref" reference="Bstamps2"}, and [\[Bfillers\]](#Bfillers){reference-type="ref" reference="Bfillers"}). HST photometry is measured on PSF-matched images in small Kron apertures, and is corrected to total fluxes using the \(H_{160}\) band image. Imaging in the \(K\) band was particularly important for our analysis, since this is the band in which we took spectroscopic observations. We used a very deep stack of \(K\) imaging data consisting of a combination of all available data over the CDF-S. This includes ESO/VLT ISAAC and HAWK-I data, along with PANIC data from Magellan. The final image has exquisite seeing of only 0. The total K-band photometry was measured in 1 diameter apertures and was corrected to total fluxes using the observed profiles of stars in the image. We find a limiting magnitude of 26.2 mag AB for a 5\(\sigma\) detection within a 0 diameter aperture. The actual aperture photometry was performed using the sinc interpolation procedure from. To estimate the errors on our fluxes, we placed 1000 random apertures scattered throughout the region of the image our targets occupy. For reliable mass estimates, we additionally measured rest-frame optical photometry at longer wavelengths in the deep \(Spitzer\)/IRAC \[3.6\] and \[4.5\] imaging data over GOODS-South. Due to the large IRAC point-spread function (PSF), we used a sophisticated neighbor subtraction scheme based on a convolution of the \(J_{125}\) images to the IRAC PSF. We then perform aperture photometry on the cleaned images in 2 diameter apertures, and correct to total fluxes using the growth curves of nearby stars in the field [for more information on the IRAC photometry see @Labbe10b; @Labbe10a; @Oesch13]. In Figures [\[Bstamps\]](#Bstamps){reference-type="ref" reference="Bstamps"}, [\[Bstamps2\]](#Bstamps2){reference-type="ref" reference="Bstamps2"} and [\[Bfillers\]](#Bfillers){reference-type="ref" reference="Bfillers"}, we show the \(i_{775}\), \(H_{160}\) and \(K\) data for each galaxy in our sample with a detected emission line. # Spectroscopic Observations {#sec:obs} We observed on January 4, 2013 for a single half night in good conditions with the MOSFIRE instrument. We targeted a single mask in the \(K\)-band while the CDFS was visible from the Keck I telescope, yielding a total exposure of 204 minutes with an AB dither pattern. For the offsets between exposures we used both a 1 and 1 dither, in order to minimize the impact of potential bad pixels. ## Reduction and Extraction The two-dimensional data reduction was performed using a slightly modified version of the MOSFIRE DRP[^1]. This pipeline yields two-dimensional, sky-subtracted data for each slitlet, which are rectified and wavelength calibrated, in units of electrons per second. Because MOSFIRE has such high quality optics, the pixel size is almost constant across the field of view and there is little other distortion, so the final rectification is minor. The reductions for the two dither patterns, 1 and 1, were done separately. The two reductions were then averaged, weighted by the exposure time for each separate stack. All the 2D frames were searched for emission lines by eye, and their fluxes were measured based on an optimal extraction using a Gauss-Hermite model. The line model was derived from the brightest line of a given galaxy (i.e. \[\]\(\lambda\)`<!-- -->`{=html}5007) and was then used to extract the flux of the remaining lines. This was particularly important for lines that were either very faint or sat partially on a night sky line. To estimate the errors of the line fluxes, we extracted background regions of the two-dimensional spectrum where no galaxy emission would occur in any of the dither positions. We used these background regions to generate fake regions the same size as the extraction region for the line. Each fake region was made by randomly selecting background pixels at the same wavelength, thus building up the fake region one column of wavelength at a time. This preserves the photon noise in regions of high or low sky background. We used the same model as used for the emission line to extract the flux of the fake region of background pixels. We did this 100 times for each line and used the root-mean square as an estimate of the error in the line flux. In the two right-hand columns of Figures [\[Bstamps\]](#Bstamps){reference-type="ref" reference="Bstamps"}, [\[Bstamps2\]](#Bstamps2){reference-type="ref" reference="Bstamps2"} and [\[Bfillers\]](#Bfillers){reference-type="ref" reference="Bfillers"}, we show the two-dimensional sky-subtracted spectra for each galaxy with a detected emission line. The sky-subtracted spectra are only shown in the wavelength regions of H\(\beta\) and the \[\] doublet. ## Flux Calibration {#cal} For the overall zero-point of the spectra, we observed GD71 as spectrophotmetric standard. This observation was done with GD71 at an airmass of 1.04 for 120 seconds. This allows us to measure the conversion between \(e^-{\rm s^{-1}}\) and \({\rm erg\ s^{-1}\ cm^{-2} \AA^{-1} }\), for that exposure. The above procedure does not deal with the variable seeing and airmass for the observations of our mask. We correct this with a simple average flux correction based on a single star within our mask. The magnitude of the star as computed from the flux calibrated spectrum is \(K = 18.24\) mag AB, while its total (5 aperture) magnitude is \(K = 18.09\) mag AB. This difference of 0.15 mag represents our estimated amount of flux lost between the typical observation of the CDFS in a 0 slit and the ideal observation of a star at almost zenith. Therefore, we multiply all of our count rate fluxes by 1.15. As we have only one flux calibration measurement, we do not have a good estimate of the uncertainties on our calibration. found an uncertainty of 15% using a similar approach as we use. Unlike that work, we will not include that uncertainty in our measurements errors. We compared the measured fluxes with the signal to noise of the lines. We found that for our sample, the 5\(\sigma\) limiting flux was \(2.5 \times10^{-18}\ {\rm erg\ s^{-1}\ cm^{-2}}\), in good agreement with the expected limits from XTcalc, the tool for calculating exposure times. # Analysis {#sec:analysis} We detected emission lines for all our primary target galaxies. We also detected lines for three of our fainter LBGs that were secondary targets. We note here we used no pre-selection for these secondary targets. The resulting line fluxes and redshifts are listed in Table [\[spectab\]](#spectab){reference-type="ref" reference="spectab"}. For almost every spectrum, it was straightforward to identify the \[\] and H\(\beta\) lines. For a few targets we do not detect H\(\beta\), usually because of night sky emission (see Figures [\[Bstamps\]](#Bstamps){reference-type="ref" reference="Bstamps"}, [\[Bstamps2\]](#Bstamps2){reference-type="ref" reference="Bstamps2"}, and [\[Bfillers\]](#Bfillers){reference-type="ref" reference="Bfillers"}). For two galaxies, Bs006541 and Bs009818, we additionally detect H\(\gamma\) in emission. The part of the night sky that this line falls in, however, is full of Telluric absorption features and our flux calibration is too uncertain in that region, which is why we do not list flux measurements for these lines in Table [\[spectab\]](#spectab){reference-type="ref" reference="spectab"}. The rest-frame optical redshifts tabulated in Table [\[spectab\]](#spectab){reference-type="ref" reference="spectab"} are average values, weighted by the significance of the detected lines. We find excellent agreement between our rest-frame optical redshifts and the pre-existing rest-frame UV redshifts. The average redshift difference is \(\delta z =-0.0023 \pm 0.0009\). For the 8 Ly\(\alpha\) emitters (LAEs) among our sample, this corresponds to a velocity offset between Ly\(\alpha\) and the \[\] line of 153\(\pm 60\) km s\(^{-1}\), possibly indicating somewhat lower outflow velocities than in LAEs at \(z\sim2\). ## Estimating the Equivalent Widths To measure the equivalent widths, we need an estimate of the continuum in the \(K\)-band for all our target galaxies. As none of our target galaxies have reliably detected continua, we used the ground based \(K\) image to estimate their continuum fluxes. The calibration for flux loss we estimated in §[3.2](#cal){reference-type="ref" reference="cal"} is, in effect, a total flux in the spatial direction but an aperture of 0 in the dispersion direction, because the data and calibrations are all measured in a slit. We elected to measure the continua expected in the \(K\)-band by measuring the magnitude of each target galaxy and the star in a circular aperture with a diameter of 0. This aperture magnitude for the star is \(K = 18.47\) mag AB. Thus, the difference between the flux in the slit and the flux in the aperture is 0.23 mag. We add this offset to each of our \(K\) measurements when estimating the continuum to calculate the equivalent width. Given the strengths of the rest-frame optical emission lines in the K-band, it is clear that these lines will contribute a significant fraction to the total K-band flux. In order to correct for this and to estimate the clean K-band continuum fluxes, we use a line-free star-bursting galaxy template from, to which we add emission lines with the individual strengths that we measured (as listed in Table [\[spectab\]](#spectab){reference-type="ref" reference="spectab"}). This template was then rescaled to match the observed, aperture corrected \(K\) magnitude for each target galaxy, from which we obtain the normalization of the line-free continuum. In Figure [\[ews\]](#ews){reference-type="ref" reference="ews"}, we plot the rest-frame equivalent width distribution including all lines detected at \(>2\sigma\). As can be seen, the H\(\beta\) equivalent widths lie in the range EW\(_0(\)H\(\beta) = 10\mbox{--}50\) Å, while the \[\]\(\lambda\)`<!-- -->`{=html}5007 EW\(_0\)s are very strong with a median of EW\(_0 = 200\) Å (i.e. \(\sim\) 900 Å observed-frame). Our observations therefore confirm that high equivalent width rest-frame optical lines result in a very large contribution of emission lines to the rest-frame optical photometry of \(z>4\) galaxies, given the width of the IRAC bands of \(\sim1~\mu\)m. Ignoring this effect can significantly bias the estimates of stellar masses in such galaxies, and it is therefore very important to derive reliable estimates of the equivalent width distribution of these rest-frame optical lines for large samples of galaxies in the future. ## Properties from Broad Band Photometry: SFRs, Extinction, and Stellar Masses {#broadprops} Using the rest-frame ultra-violet data, we can estimate the UV continuum spectral slope, \(\beta\), which provides a measurement of the extinction in star-forming galaxies via the IRX-\(\beta\) relation. In Table [\[sedtab\]](#sedtab){reference-type="ref" reference="sedtab"}, we list the measured UV spectral slope and the resulting \(A_{1600}\). With the dust correction, we can then estimate a star-formation rate from our UV imaging alone. We will call this dust-corrected SFR from the UV, SFR\(_{\rm UV}\). In order to estimate stellar masses for our galaxies, we use the ZEBRA+ spectral energy distribution fitting code with models at sub-solar metallicity (\(0.2Z_\odot\)) and constant star-formation. We verified that the stellar masses do not change significantly if using different assumptions for the star-formation histories, such as exponentially increasing or decreasing functional forms. Given the large contribution of rest-frame optical emission lines to the K-band photometry, we self-consistently add both nebular emission lines as well as nebular continuum emission to the templates. This is done by converting 80% of ionizing photons from these templates to recombination lines for H and He using case B recombination and adding metal lines relative to the H\(\beta\) fluxes using the tabulated relations of. # Results and Discussion {#sec:results} ## Different Indicators of the Star Formation Rate The duty cycle of star-formation at high redshift is currently still not well constrained observationally. Based on clustering and the evolution of the mass-SFR relation across \(z\sim4-6\), it has been suggested that the duty cycle might be relatively low at \(\sim40\%\). This can be tested with spectroscopic observations of Balmer lines, compared to the SFR inferred from the non-ionizing UV continuum. The UV light we observe in high redshift LBGs comes from stars over a larger range in masses than the ionizing photons we indirectly observe in H\(\beta\) emission. Therefore, these two indicators measure, in effect, different star-formation time scales. In the case of continuous star-formation, we expect these two indicators to roughly agree, if there is no contribution to the UV or H\(\beta\) flux from other sources such as Active Galactic Nuclei. We plot the luminosity in H\(\beta\) and the UV star-formation rate in Figure [\[sfrHb\]](#sfrHb){reference-type="ref" reference="sfrHb"}, along with simple relation between H\(\beta\) and star-formation rate from. This relation assumes case B recombination to estimate the flux ratio of H\(\beta\) to H\(\alpha\), a factor of 2.86, and converts the initial mass functions to a Chabrier, another factor of 1.8 from the Salpeter assumed by. Both the H\(\beta\) luminosity and the UV derived star-formation rate have been corrected for dust extinction assuming the dust extinction from with an \(R_V = 4.03\). The extinction was derived from A1600 (see §[4.2](#broadprops){reference-type="ref" reference="broadprops"}) assuming the Calzetti extinction law, with the stellar continuum having only 0.44 of the extinction of the emission lines. The agreement between the two star-formation rates is excellent in the mean, with an average difference of only 2%. The overall good agreement between the two star-formation rate indicators implies that the H\(\beta\) luminosity likely all comes from star-formation and that the star-formation histories of these galaxies have been relatively constant over a \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}10-30 Myr timescale. Furthermore, our finding provides a basis for predicting the Balmer line luminosities for galaxies at even higher redshifts,where Balmer line emission may contaminate the IRAC photometry. This will be essential for unbiased mass estimates using the large \(Spitzer\)/IRAC datasets over the CANDELS fields in the near future. ## Specific Star-Formation Rates based on the H\(\beta\) Lines The specific star-formation rates (sSFR) of galaxies at \(z\gtrsim3\) is currently highly debated. Previous studies, however, were mostly based on quantities inferred exclusively based on stellar population fitting to the broad-band photometry. Given our H\(\beta\) equivalent width measurement, we can now start to derive a spectroscopic estimate of the sSFR at \(z\sim3.5\). The relation between sSFR and H\(\beta\) flux comes about because the H\(\beta\) flux is a measure of the star-formation rate, as Balmer series emission can arise from ionizing photons in the star-forming regions, and the optical continuum comes from stellar emission which is a measure of the total amount of stars in the galaxy. This relation will be, however, modified by the extinction of both the optical continuum and of the star-forming regions, with the latter expected to have a larger opacity. In Figure [\[ewb\]](#ewb){reference-type="ref" reference="ewb"} we examine the relation between the H\(\beta\) rest-frame equivalent width and the slope of the UV continuum slope, \(\beta\), for galaxies in our spectroscopic sample. Dustier star-forming galaxies will have larger values of \(\beta\), so this plot combines a measurement of the specific star-formation rate and a measurement of the amount of dust in the galaxy. We plot, with lines, models of a constant star-formation rate with different ages with the appropriate amount of dust to match the \(\beta\) values on the x-axis. We use the dust model from and increase the extinction for the line emission using equation 3 from that work. Our data fall along the line of model with a specific star-formation rate of 1 Gyr\(^{-1}\), or an age of 1 Gyr, a typical value for Lyman break selected galaxies at this redshift. ## The \[\]/H\(\beta\) Emission Line Ratios The primary goal of our observations was to analyze the emission line properties of \(z\sim3.5\) star-forming galaxies. In particular, there is now growing evidence of increasingly high \[\]/H\(\beta\) line ratios with redshift up to \(z\sim3\), suggesting that the conditions for star-formation might be quite different at high redshift compared to local galaxies. With our sample of 18 galaxies with emission line detections we can now further test these observations at \(z\sim3.5\). In Figure [\[oxymass\]](#oxymass){reference-type="ref" reference="oxymass"} we plot the \[\]/H\(\beta\) ratio as a function of mass. As can be seen, all our galaxies show line ratios larger than 2, with a median of \(5.1^{+0.5}_{-0.5}\), which appears to be independent of stellar mass. For a reference sample of typical local galaxies, we use the MPA-JHU catalog of. This is not a directly comparable sample, as the selection is very different, but provides a large number of galaxies with stellar masses and emission line strengths. We compare with a subset of the DR7 version of the catalog. We restrict the redshift range to \(0.015 < z < 0.08\). The resulting catalog contains 260,647 galaxies covering a wide range of properties and star-formation rates. Each galaxy has a measurement of the H\(\beta\) and \[\] flux and equivalent width. In addition, each galaxy has an estimated stellar mass and star-formation rate. The stellar masses come from the imaging data alone, and are thus comparable to our mass estimates. The catalog also contains a classification for each source, as either AGN driven or star-formation driven. We use this classification to plot contours of AGN dominated sources and star-formation dominated sources in Figure [\[oxymass\]](#oxymass){reference-type="ref" reference="oxymass"}. For our purposes, we combine both AGN and star-forming classifications into one each. We plot those galaxies classified as 'composite' in Figure [\[oxymass\]](#oxymass){reference-type="ref" reference="oxymass"}, but they are ignored when generating the contours showing where AGN or star-forming galaxies are distributed in the figure. It is immediately clear from Figure [\[oxymass\]](#oxymass){reference-type="ref" reference="oxymass"} that the LBGs we have observed lie far off of the relationship of star-forming galaxies in the local universe. Many of the galaxies lie in the part of the diagram where sources are classified as AGN in the local universe (illustrated by black contours). The highest mass galaxies lie in a region dominated by AGN, while at lower masses our sources lie in a region which is completely devoid of local galaxies. In order to increase the sample size of high-redshift sources, we additionally collect data from the literature. First, the work by and provides measurements of \[\] and H\(\beta\) line fluxes for a number of LBGs at similar redshifts as our targets. We use the summary of data from which includes stellar masses and star-formation rates as well as line strengths. In fact, the galaxies CDFS-4414 and CDFS-4417 from and are also present in our sample as Bs012141 and Bs012208, respectively. The recently published sample of represents an excellent combination with our data. These authors observed 20 galaxies with MOSFIRE that were selected essentially in the exact same manner as our primary galaxy sample. Namely, they are LBGs, mostly with pre-existing redshift measurements from rest-frame UV spectra. Instead of the GOODS-S field, targeted GOODS-N, however. For each of their galaxies tabulate H\(\beta\) and \[\] flux measurements, along with equivalent widths estimated from the \(K\) band continuum. As they tabulate the sum of the two \[\] lines, we multiply their tabulated line flux by 0.75 to estimate the strength of the 5007Å line alone. include a 15% calibration error for their flux estimates. When we estimate the errors on the ratios of the line fluxes, we remove that calibration error. All high-redshift measurements from the literature are shown as blue symbols in the lower panel of Figure [\[oxymass\]](#oxymass){reference-type="ref" reference="oxymass"}, clearly showing that a high ration of \[\] over H\(\beta\) is an ubiquitous feature among star-forming galaxies at \(z\sim3\). We find a mean ratio of \(4.8^{+0.8}_{-1.7}\) when we combine our sample with the rest from the literature, after removing the two galaxies in common between our sample and the sample of. It is also clear from the Figure, that even after the combination with the larger sample from the literature, we find very little dependence of the line ratio on the stellar mass. ## Possible Contribution by Active Galactic Nuclei The high observed line ratios in our \(z\sim3.5\) galaxy sample trigger the question, whether these are all dominated by active galactic nuclei (AGN). In the local universe, we generally observe such high values of the \[\] to H\(\beta\) ratio only in AGNs. and find evidence for active galactic nuclei powering at least some of the \(z\sim1-2\) population and that the lower redshift mass-excitation relations of still discriminate between AGN and star-forming galaxies at \(z\sim2\), after only small modifications to slightly higher line ratios. Thus, the high \[\] to H\(\beta\) ratio we observe in Figure [\[oxymass\]](#oxymass){reference-type="ref" reference="oxymass"} could be, for the higher stellar mass galaxies at least, a result of black hole accretion. If the division remains the same at \(z\sim3.5\) as at \(z\sim1.5\), almost all of the galaxies in Figure [\[oxymass\]](#oxymass){reference-type="ref" reference="oxymass"} would be classified as possible AGN. Given the extremely deep X-ray data over the GOODS-South field, we can test for such AGN contamination in our sample. Using the Chandra 4 Ms catalog of, we search to see if any of our sources are obvious X-ray emitters. Unsurprisingly, none of the X-ray sources are within a point spread function half-width half-maximum of our spectroscopic targets. We then stack the images of, to see if we detected an average signal from the galaxies in our spectroscopic sample. When performing this stacking, we removed any sources detected in the catalog. We did this by excising a 7 pixel by 7 pixel box centered on the source, where each pixel is 0 in size. To build up a background sample, we also extract postage stamps of random parts of the X-ray images. We required that our stamps have no sources within 25 pixels of the stamp center. Thus, both our source stacks and our background stacks will have similar levels of contamination from undetected objects. As the Chandra point spread function becomes larger with increasing radius from the pointing center, we only included background regions with centers whose radii were the same range as our sources. For both the source and the background stack, we extract a 5 by 5 pixel region at the center from the 0.5-2.0 keV soft band image. In our 200 background images, we found 955 counts for an average of 4.8 counts per image. We found 122 counts in our stack of 18 source images for an average 6.8 counts per source. This yields a net of 2.0 counts. This is not, however, statistically significant. We would expect, at random, a stack of 18 images to show 210 counts 17% of the time. Because AGN luminosity is correlated with the stellar mass of the galaxy, we additionally assembled a stack of the nine highest stellar mass galaxies in our sample. This stack has an average of 8.7 counts per image, for a net 3.9, which only happens 6% of the time. This is still not statistically significant. We note also that larger samples of galaxies in this redshift range, selected by both photometric and by spectroscopic redshifts, show statistically significant emission, but at luminosities consistent with star-formation. This implies that for typical galaxies in this redshift range, the dominant source of the X-ray emission is not an AGN, but rather star-formation. Furthermore, for the galaxies for which we do have pre-existing rest-frame UV spectra, we confirmed that none of these sources show any evidence for the presence of an AGN (e.g. based on \[\], \[\], or broad Ly\(\alpha\) emission). In summary, we do detect an excess of X-ray events, especially in the higher mass galaxy stack, but it is not statistically significant. Additionally, we do not find any evidence for AGN contamination based on the rest-frame UV spectra. However, we cannot completely rule out the idea that active galactic nuclei generate the high observed emission line ratios at least for some of the galaxies in our sample, in particular if they are optically thick for X-rays. ## The Conditions of Star-formation in LBGs at \(z\sim3.5\). Star-formation can produce high \[\] to H\(\beta\) ratios as seen in our sample. For example, the models of and have star-forming regions in intense starbursts producing \[\] to H\(\beta\) ratios of \(\sim5\). These models do not require especially low metallicity or high electron densities, but they do require high ionization parameters. For example, the peak \[\] to H\(\beta\) in the continuous star-formation model of is 5.4 for a model with a metal abundance of \(Z=0.2 Z_\odot\) and an electron density of 350 \(cm^{-3}\), while the electron density of 10 \(cm^{-3}\) model produces a ratio of 5.2. Both models, however, require ionization parameters of \(3\times10^{8} {\rm cm\ s^{-1}}\), one to two orders of magnitude higher than found in local star-forming galaxies. When including the impact of radiation pressure in dense star-forming regions, the recent models of and can produce even higher \[\] to H\(\beta\) ratios. In all these models, a high \[\] to H\(\beta\) ratio implies a significantly lower line strength, around 70 to 80% of the H\(\beta\) strength. This is indeed observed in high redshift galaxies. The above models provide a physical explanation for the large emission line ratios we observe, namely a combination of a large ionization parameter and radiation pressure. This implies that the conditions of star-formation are very different in these high redshift LBGs as compared with galaxies at the same stellar mass in the local universe. As was highlighted by and, galaxies with strong ionization parameters often have higher specific star-formation rates than the typical star-forming galaxies in the local universe. In Figure [\[oxyssfr\]](#oxyssfr){reference-type="ref" reference="oxyssfr"}, we plot the \[\]/H\(\beta\) specific star-formation rate of galaxies in our sample, combined with the galaxies from and. We also show the location of local galaxies with star-formation rates of at least 2 \({\rm M_{\odot}\ yr^{-1}}\) and classified as star-formation dominated by. While the typical \(z\sim0\) star-forming galaxy shows low ratios of \[\]\(\lambda\)`<!-- -->`{=html}5007 to H\(\beta\) (only \(\sim0.3\)) and specific star-formation rates (SSFRs) of \(\sim10^{-10}\) yr\(^{-1}\), a small tail of the local population extends to significantly higher SSFRs and higher line ratios. Interestingly, this tail nicely connects up with the location of the \(z\sim3-4\) sample. This suggests that (1) the ionization and/or the radiation pressure of HII regions is connected with the global SSFR, coupling a local and a galaxy-wide property, and (2) a small sub-sample of local star-forming galaxies exhibits similar conditions of star-formation as the \(z\sim3-4\) population. These are the galaxies with similarly high SSFRs. Note, however, that these local galaxies on average have a factor 4-5\(\times\) lower masses than our \(z\sim3-4\) sample. ## How representative is the current sample? As we have shown above, all of the observed LBGs have extreme star-forming conditions, very different from typical local galaxies. Since LBGs are the dominant contributors to the total star-formation rate at this high redshift, this suggests that star-formation was very different in the early universe compared to the typical local galaxy. However, this depends on how representative our sample is. The galaxies in our sample, and those in and, are generally selected by Ly\(\alpha\) emission. found that the median Lyman \(\alpha\) rest-frame equivalent width for \(z\simeq3\) galaxies was 0 Å, implying that half of the sample shows emission. Our sample is in agreement with that fraction (8 out of 15 show Ly\(\alpha\) emission). Combining our sample with that of, however, we find 24 Ly\(\alpha\) emitters out of 36 galaxies. By random chance, we would not expect to draw 24 emitters out of 36 galaxies from the sample. Thus it is likely that our the combined sample is biased towards Ly\(\alpha\) emitting LBGs. When examining the properties of LBGs, also found that those galaxies with Lyman \(\alpha\) emission generally had lower star-formation rates and lower amounts of dust extinction as measured by bluer values of the UV continuum slope \(\beta\). We find an average star-formation rate for our sample of \(24 \pm 6\ {\rm M_{\odot}\ yr^{-1}}\), well in-line with the expectations of the Lyman \(\alpha\) emitters in. From this, we conclude that our sample, and the ensemble of our sample with that of, resemble a sample of moderate Lyman \(\alpha\) emitters in properties. In summary, we may not extend our results to the whole of the LBG population but, that being said, our sample combined with that of seems typical for those galaxies with modest Lyman \(\alpha\) emission, characterized by lower star-formation rates and lower dust content than typical LBGs. # Conclusion We observed 24 galaxies using the MOSFIRE spectrograph, where 15 were selected by having existing rest-frame UV redshift measurements such that we could observe lines with minimal interference from night-sky emission lines. The remaining nine galaxies were \(z\sim4\) LBGs that fell within the mask. For each galaxy, we measured stellar masses, UV spectral slopes, and star-formation rates using existing broad band imaging. From our spectra, we measured the strength of the optical emission lines H\(\beta\) and the \[\] lines at 4959 and 5007Å. Our main findings are: - Every galaxy in our primary sample has a detected emission line. Three out of the **nine** galaxies without a known redshift were also detected, pointing to the possibility of a more general survey of galaxies based on a photometric redshift selection alone. - The relation between the equivalent width of H\(\beta\) and the specific star-formation rate from fitting a spectral energy distribution matches the expectation for a population with a specific star-formation rate of \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}1 Gyr\(^{-1}\), if the dust properties are modeled by the relation of. - Using the standard dust correction based on the UV continuum slope \(\beta\), the star-formation rates from the UV and those inferred from the H\(\beta\) line flux agree very well. This implies that the star-formation properties of these galaxies have been relatively constant on time-scales of \(\sim\)`<!-- -->`{=html}10-30 Myr, with no evidence for bursty star-formation in these sources. - The ratio of \[\] to H\(\beta\) is much higher, \(5.1^{+0.5}_{-0.5}\)  than in similar mass star-forming galaxies in the local universe. When we combine our results with other \(z\sim3\) samples, the ensemble of 67 galaxies has a median value of \(4.8^{+0.8}_{-1.7}\), unlike the values of 0.3 to 1 found in the local universe. This implies that the typical conditions for star-formation at \(z\sim3.5\) for UV bright galaxies are very different than in the local universe, requiring either much higher ionization parameters, or possibly strong radiation pressure to explain. - The line ratio of \[\] to H\(\beta\) is strongly correlated with specific star-formation in the local universe. A tail of local galaxies with the highest sSFRs shows elevated line ratios similar to what we find for \(z\sim4\) galaxies, thus linking our high-redshift sources with the physical conditions of \(z\sim0\) galaxies. This correlation of sSFR and line ratio implies that local physics within star-forming regions appears to be correlated with the larger scale rate of star formation across a broad range in galaxy mass scales. *Facility:* , , , [^1]: https://code.google.com/p/mosfire/

{'timestamp': '2014-02-06T02:13:54', 'yymm': '1401', 'arxiv_id': '1401.5490', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5490'}

# Introduction The rich world of low-dimensional quantum systems has attracted and continues to attract immense interest. Indeed, restriction of the particles' motion to lower dimensions increases the role of both interactions and quantum fluctuations, and gives rise to exotic quantum states such as Luttinger liquids, fractional quantum Hall  and quantum spin Hall states  as well as various spin liquid states, not to mention the family of high temperature superconductors, where effective two-dimensionality seems to play a determining role . Ultracold atoms opened radically new perspectives in the study of low-dimensional quantum systems. By means of deep optical lattices , single 'pancake' and 'cigar-shaped' traps or Hermite-Gaussian laser beams one can now create quasi-two-dimensional and one-dimensional structures at ease, and can study their dynamical and interaction properties systematically [@dalibard_BKT; @nagerl_TG_gas; @ketterle_pencake_trap; @nagerl_cigar_shaped; @chin_BKT; @dalibard_BKT_PRL; @phillips_BKT; @krauth_BKT]. In fact, increasing precision and experimental control gradually promoted these optical systems to 'quantum simulators' , allowing to test the validity of various theoretical approaches systematically. These optical systems also go beyond their condensed matter counterparts in that they allow the creation of *multicomponent* fermionic and bosonic systems in restricted geometries while controlling their interaction, and thereby open the possibility to realizing new quantum states of matter , never observed before. Controlling the interaction between various species in these restricted geometries is of primary importance. As we know from the seminal works of Olshanii  and Petrov and Shlyapnikov , confinement substantially changes the interaction in quasi-one and two dimensions . Confinement-tuning has indeed been used recently to control the interaction within one-dimensional Bose gases . In quasi-two dimensions, in particular, it leads to the emergence of a bound state of energy \(E_b\) for all values of the three-dimensional scattering length, \(a_{3D}\), thereby making the interaction of low-energy quasiparticles repulsive, and leads to the emergence of a logarithmically broad scattering resonance at collision energies \(\epsilon \sim E_b\). The existence of these bound states has indeed been observed both in quasi-one and in quasi-two dimensions . While our theoretical understanding of the interactions of one-component quasi-one-and quasi-two-dimensional bosons is quite complete, double-layer systems are much less explored. The purpose of the present work is to study how separation between the layers influences the interaction between the species and the fate of quasi-bound states. As we show below, the structure of the effective interactions changes radically as one separates the two layers; new resonances identified as interspecies quasi-bound states appear at previously forbidden transition energies. Moreover, in contrast to the very broad resonances identified by Petrov and Shlyapnikov, these resonances become much sharper as one separates the layers and, as we demonstrate through the computation of the 'shaking spectrum' of a double-layer thermal gas, they should be clearly observable in experiments. In addition, upon changing the separation between the two layers, new Feshbach-like resonances emerge in the low energy scattering amplitude, thereby allowing a geometrical control of the effective interlayer interaction. The geometrically-tuned interaction control opens a route to realizing novel interaction-driven quantum phases of layered two-dimensional multicomponent systems. In condensed matter, such systems are of great interest due to their exotic behavior: exitonic Bose condensates  and exotic integer and fractional quantum-Hall states  have been predicted and observed in bilayer two-dimensional quantum well structures. More recently, a similarly rich quantum Hall behavior   and the emergence of zero field magnetic phases has been discovered in bilayer graphene . The special structure of topological excitations in certain two-dimensional multicomponent systems is also expected to modify the character of phase transition . We shall study bosonic atoms of two different hyperfine states, labeled by \(\alpha = \uparrow\) and \(\downarrow\), confined optically along the \(z\) direction with potential minima at positions \(z^0_\uparrow\) and \(z^0_\downarrow\), respectively, and interacting through the short-ranged potentials, \(g_{\alpha\alpha^\prime} \,\delta({\bf r}-{\bf r}^\prime)\), characterized by the corresponding three-dimensional scattering lengths, \(a_{\uparrow \uparrow}\), \(a_{\uparrow \downarrow}\) and \(a_{\downarrow \downarrow}\). We assume a parabolic confinement, described by the single particle Hamiltonians \[{\cal H}_{\uparrow,\downarrow}= \frac{{\mathbf p}^2}{2 \,m} + \frac{m\, \omega_z^2}{2}\; z_{\uparrow,\downarrow}^2\;, \label{eq:calH} \\ \] with the \(z\) coordinates \(z_{\uparrow,\downarrow} = z-z_{\uparrow,\downarrow}^0\) measured from the centers of the layers , and the separation \(d_{\uparrow\downarrow}\equiv z^0_\downarrow-z^0_\uparrow\) of the two layers being tunable through the application of an external magnetic field gradient (see Fig. [\[fig:ExperimentalSetup\]](#fig:ExperimentalSetup){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:ExperimentalSetup"}). Individual particle states in the two layers can then be classified by their momentum \(\bf q\) within the \(xy\) plane and a harmonic oscillator quantum number \(n\), referring to their motion along the \(z\) direction. We start our analysis by studying the scattering of two particles on each other. Clearly, Eq. [\[eq:calH\]](#eq:calH){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:calH"} as well as the interaction allow us to separate center of mass (\(\mathrm{Z}\)) and relative coordinates (\(\mathrm{z} \equiv z_\alpha-z_\beta\)). In particular, in the absence of interactions, the two particles' wave function in the \(z\) direction can be expressed as \(\Psi\sim \varphi_N(\sqrt{2}\mathrm{Z}) \varphi_\nu(\mathrm{z}/\sqrt{2})\), with \(\varphi_\nu\) denoting the usual harmonic oscillator wave functions for an oscillator length \(l_z\equiv \sqrt{\hbar/(m\omega_z)}\), and \(N\) and \(\nu\) the center of mass and relative motions' quantum numbers, respectively. In the center of mass frame, particles of opposite spin interact through the off-center interaction in Fig. [\[fig:ExperimentalSetup\]](#fig:ExperimentalSetup){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:ExperimentalSetup"}.b. Two incoming particles of opposite momenta \(q= |{\bf q}|\) and of energy \(\epsilon = \hbar^2{q}^2/m + \nu \, \hbar\omega_z\), can scatter from channel \(\nu\) into channel \(\nu'\), provided that the outgoing channel is 'open', \(\nu' \hbar \omega_z \leq \epsilon\). A lengthy but relatively straightforward generalization of the computations of Ref.  to our case yields the following expression for the scattering amplitudes in the open channels, \[f_{\alpha\beta}^{\nu\nu'}(\epsilon) = \frac{ 4 \pi \; a_{\alpha\beta}\; \phi_{\nu}( d_{\alpha\beta}) \phi_{\nu'}(d_{\alpha\beta}) }{ 1 + \frac {a_{\alpha_\beta}}{\sqrt {2\pi} \; l_z} \; \; w_{\alpha\beta}(\epsilon/\hbar\omega_z)}. \label{eq:T-matrix_2body}\] Here \(d_{\alpha\beta}\equiv z_\beta^0-z_\alpha^0\) stands for the separation between layer \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\), \(\phi_{\nu}(\mathrm{z})\) denotes \(\phi_{\nu}(\mathrm{z})\equiv\varphi_{\nu}(\mathrm{z}/\sqrt{2})/\sqrt[4]{2}\) and the function \(w_{\alpha\beta}(\epsilon/\hbar \omega_z)\) is given by the expression \[w_{\alpha\beta} ( x) \approx -\sum_{\nu=0}^{2 \bar \nu-1} \sqrt {2\pi} \; l_z {{\phi}^2_{\nu}( d_{\alpha\beta})} \ln{\Bigl( \frac{ \nu-x}{2}-i \,0^+ \Bigr)} + c_{\bar \nu} ,\nonumber\] with \(c_\nu=2\sqrt{\frac{\nu}{\pi}}\ln{\frac{\nu}{e^2}}\), and \(\bar \nu \gg \epsilon/\hbar\omega_z\) a sufficiently large cut-off parameter . The logarithmic terms in the expression of \(w_{\alpha\beta}\) incorporate the effects of virtual transitions to open or closed transverse channels. The prefactors \({{\phi}^2_{\nu}( d_{\alpha\beta})}\) appear since the two particles must stay at the same position to interact through the potential in Fig. [\[fig:ExperimentalSetup\]](#fig:ExperimentalSetup){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:ExperimentalSetup"}.b. While for scattering within the same spin channels we have \(d_{\uparrow\uparrow}=d_{\downarrow\downarrow}=0\), and Eq. [\[eq:T-matrix_2body\]](#eq:T-matrix_2body){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:T-matrix_2body"} reduces to the expression of Ref. , for the spin \(\uparrow\downarrow\) channel \(f_{\uparrow\downarrow}(\epsilon)\) depends sensitively on the distance \(d_{\uparrow\downarrow}\) between the two layers through the relative wave functions, \(\phi_\nu\). For small energies, \(\epsilon\approx 0\) in particular, \(w_{\alpha\beta}(x)\) behaves as \(w_{\alpha\beta}(x)\approx e^{-d_{\alpha\beta}^2/2l_z^2} \left(-\ln|x| + i \pi \theta(x) + \gamma_{\alpha\beta}\right)\), with the separation dependent dimensionless prefactor, \(\gamma_{\alpha\beta}\), of order 1. Thus, the scattering amplitudes have a pole at \(\epsilon < 0\), corresponding to a bound state at an energy \[E^{0}_{\alpha\beta} \propto-\hbar\, \omega_z\; e^{-1/ |a_{\alpha\beta}| {\phi^2_0(d_{\alpha\beta})}},\] for small negative scattering lengths. For positive energies, \(\epsilon>0\), the imaginary part of \(w_{\alpha\beta}\) is finite, and \(f_{\alpha\beta}(\epsilon)\) displays resonances of finite width each time the real part of the denominator of Eq. [\[eq:T-matrix_2body\]](#eq:T-matrix_2body){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:T-matrix_2body"} crosses zero, indicating quasi-bound states of finite lifetime. The corresponding energies are displayed in Fig. [\[fig:QB\]](#fig:QB){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:QB"} for some typical confinement parameters as a function of \(l_z/a_{\alpha\beta}\). The interlayer scattering (solid line) displays features completely absent in intralayer scattering (dashed lines). While for intralayer scattering \(\nu=0\to\nu =1\) relative quantum number transitions are forbidden by reflection symmetry, such interlayer processes are allowed once \(d_{\uparrow\downarrow} \ne0\), and they amount in the emergence of a quasi-bound molecular state (resonance) at an energy \[(E^{1}_{\uparrow\downarrow}-\hbar \,\omega_z)\; \propto \;-\hbar \,\omega_z\, e^{-1/|a_{\uparrow\downarrow}| {\phi^2_1(d_{\uparrow\downarrow})}}\;,\] and a corresponding resonance in the scattering amplitudes in [\[eq:T-matrix_2body\]](#eq:T-matrix_2body){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:T-matrix_2body"}. Importantly, while the binding energy of this quasi-bound state is determined by \(\phi^2_1(d_{\uparrow\downarrow})\), its decay rate is proportional to the imaginary part of \(w_{\uparrow\downarrow}\) at the resonance frequency, which is proportional to \(\phi^2_0(d_{\uparrow\downarrow})\). Therefore, increasing the separation between the two layers of atoms, one can make the quasi-bound state sharper and sharper---at the cost of somewhat decreasing the binding energy (see also the inset of Fig. [\[fig:QB\]](#fig:QB){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:QB"}). Similar interlayer quasi-bound states of energy \(E_{\uparrow\downarrow}^\nu\) appear close to every threshold, \(\epsilon\approx \nu \,\hbar\,\omega_z\), and can turn to a narrow resonance as one increases the layer separation \(d_{\uparrow\downarrow}\). We should emphasize that Fig. [\[fig:QB\]](#fig:QB){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:QB"} displays only the relative energy \(\epsilon\) of the bound states and quasi-bound states in the center of mass frame. The total energy of two particles with total incoming momentum \({\bf Q} = {\bf q}_1 + {\bf q}_2\) is, however, given as a sum of their relative motion's energy, \(\epsilon\), and the energy associated with the center of mass motion, \(E_{\rm COM} = N \hbar \omega_z + {{Q}^2}/{4m}\). Accordingly, the bound state spectrum in Fig. [\[fig:QB\]](#fig:QB){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:QB"} gets shifted by an energy \(N \hbar \omega_z\) for each center of mass quantum number \(N\), corresponding to excited molecular bound states with an oscillating center of mass coordinate along the \(z\) direction. The emergent interlayer quasi-bound states can also be used to engineer the interaction between atoms in the two layers. In particular, the effective interaction in a degenerate two-dimensional Bose gas is approximately proportional to the scattering amplitude at the corresponding energy \(\epsilon = 2\mu\), with the chemical potential \(\mu\) . Fig. [\[fig:f_updown\]](#fig:f_updown){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:f_updown"} shows the \(\uparrow\downarrow\) scattering amplitude as a function of layer separation for fixed energies \(0 < \epsilon \ll \omega_z\). For the parameters chosen, the interaction initially decreases with increasing separation, and a sharp Feshbach-resonance-like structure emerges as the quasi-bound state reaches the energy of the incoming particles, leading to a very strong interaction between the two species. Crossing this resonance, the effective interaction turns from repulsive to attractive. Notice that, in contrast to single layer systems , these resonances appear on *both* sides of the three-dimensional Feshbach resonance, and, in a somewhat unusual way, they become the sharpest on the repulsive side, \(a_{\uparrow\downarrow} > 0\). The lifetime of the interlayer quasi-bound states becomes exponentially long upon increasing the separation of the layers, and they can therefore be detected in a shaking experiment. To demonstrate this, we study a strongly confined dilute thermal gas (with a temperature \(T\ll \omega_z\)), coupled to a time dependent magnetic field gradient that shakes the layers in opposite directions. To account for many-body effects, we describe the gas in terms of the second quantized Hamiltonian, \[\begin{aligned} H&=&\int {\rm d}^3 {\bf r} \bigl\{ \sum_\alpha\psi^\dagger_\alpha(\mathbf{r}) ({\cal H}_{\alpha}-\mu_\alpha) \psi_\alpha (\mathbf{r}) \nonumber \\ &+&\, \sum_{\alpha,\beta} \frac{g_{\alpha\beta}}{2} \, \psi^\dagger_\alpha(\mathbf{r}) \psi^\dagger_\beta(\mathbf{r}) \psi_\beta(\mathbf{r}) \psi_\alpha(\mathbf{r}) \bigr\}, \label{eq:H_manybody} \end{aligned}\] with the chemical potentials \(\mu_\alpha<0\) setting the densities of the gases. The fields \(\psi_\alpha\) are expanded in terms of the harmonic oscillator wave functions as \(\psi_\alpha(\mathbf{r}) \propto \sum_{n, {\bf q}} {\varphi}_n(z-z^0_\alpha) \, e^{i\mathbf{q\,\rho}} \, a_{\alpha n}(\mathbf{q})\), with \(\mathbf{\rho}\) denoting the in-plane coordinates of the particles, and \(a_{\alpha n}(\mathbf{q})\) their annihilation operators. Shaking is described by the modulation of the Hamiltonian \({\cal H}_{\uparrow,\downarrow}\), \[\delta{\cal H}_\alpha(t) =-h_\alpha \cos{(\omega t)}\, z_\alpha /l_z, \label{eq:dH}\] with the fields \(h_{\alpha}\sim \mu_B (\nabla \delta B)\) characterizing the amplitudes of shaking for the two hyperfine components. Clearly, shaking leads to intralayer transitions, i.e. \(n=0 \rightarrow 1\) transitions within each layer. Decomposed in relative and center of mass coordinates, however, these excitations correspond to pair excitations with quantum numbers \((N,\nu)=(1,0)\) and \((N,\nu)=(0,1)\). Therefore, shaking should not only allow to excite thermal particles to higher intrawell bands (at energy \(\hbar\omega_z\)), but--through the interaction with other thermal bosons-- also allow to excite the \(\uparrow\downarrow\)-quasi-bound state of energy \(E_{\uparrow\downarrow}^1\) in the \((N,\nu)=(0,1)\) channel, and the \(\uparrow\uparrow\) (and \(\downarrow\downa\))-bound states of energy \(E_{\uparrow\upa}^0 + \hbar \omega_z\) (or \(E_{\downarrow\downa}^0 + \hbar \omega_z\)) in the \((N,\nu)=(1,0)\) channel . We therefore expect peaks at all these energies in the absorption spectrum. To determine the shaking spectrum, we employed field theoretical methods, and calculated the imaginary part of the shaking susceptibility \(\chi^{\prime\prime}_\alpha (\omega)\) by neglecting vertex corrections and computing the 'dressed' bubble diagram shown in Fig. [\[fig:FeynmanDiagrams\]](#fig:FeynmanDiagrams){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:FeynmanDiagrams"}.c. The quantity \(h_\alpha^2 \omega \chi^{\prime\prime}_\alpha (\omega)\) is then directly proportional to the rate of energy absorption in layer \(\alpha\). Interactions between the bosons have bee incorporated through the self-energies \(\Sigma^{nn'}_\alpha(\omega)\) of the retarded propagators \((G_R)^{n n'}_{\alpha}(\omega)\), \[(G_R^{-1})^{n n'}_{\alpha} (\omega,\mathbf{q}) = \omega + i 0^+ + \frac{\hbar\, q^2}{2 m} + n \omega_z\, \delta_{n n'} + \frac{1}{\hbar}\Sigma^{n n'}_{\alpha} (\omega,\mathbf{q}), \nonumber\] with the self-energies computed within the \(T\)-matrix approximation by summing up the complete ladder series for the \(T\)-matrix (vertex function), as shown in Fig. [\[fig:FeynmanDiagrams\]](#fig:FeynmanDiagrams){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:FeynmanDiagrams"}.a, through solving the corresponding Bethe-Salpeter equations. Details of this calculations are given in, here we just summarize the main results. Fig. [\[fig:Spectrum\]](#fig:Spectrum){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:Spectrum"} displays the numerically computed shaking spectrum for some typical parameters in the cross-over regime, \(l_z/a_{\alpha\beta}\sim d/ l_z\sim 1\). For simplicity, we assumed shaking fields \(h_\uparrow = h_\downarrow\), and repulsive three-dimensional scattering lengths of equal size in all three scattering channels, \(a_{\alpha\beta}=a\). We can clearly distinguish three peaks in the spectra. The largest peak at \(\omega \approx \omega_z\) corresponds the direct subband transitions within the same layer, and has an amplitude directly proportional to the boson density. We also observe, however, two smaller peaks. These peaks are due to two-body processes, and therefore their intensities are proportional to the square of the boson densities. The peak next to the large quasiparticle excitation peak is due to the quasi-bound molecular state in the \(\uparrow\downarrow\) channel at energy \(E_{\uparrow\downarrow}^1\), indicated by the empty circle in Fig.[\[fig:QB\]](#fig:QB){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:QB"}. As expected, for separations \(d\sim l_z\) this peak is indeed sharp enough and can be identified unambiguously within the shaking spectrum. Although this quasi-bound resonance may appear relatively weak at a first sight for the thermal gas studied here, it is expected to get more pronounced as the bosons are cooled down and the system is driven towards quantum degeneracy, a regime beyond the reach of approximations used here. The peak at even smaller frequencies has an entirely different origin. This peak can be identified as being due to a transition into the \(\uparrow\upa\) or \(\downarrow\downa\) intralayer bound states combined with a center of mass excitation, \(N=0\to 1\) (full circle in Fig. [\[fig:QB\]](#fig:QB){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:QB"}). Notice that--to leading order--a direct transition to the bound state is forbidden by symmetry (parity), and therefore excitation of a center of mass oscillation is necessary to observe the \(E_{\uparrow\upa}^0\) and \(E_{\downarrow\downa}^0\) bound states. This peak is expected to split up for \(a_{\uparrow\uparrow}\ne a_{\downarrow\downa}\), and vanishes if we set \(a_{\uparrow\uparrow}, a_{\downarrow\downa}\to 0\) (see inset of Fig. [\[fig:Spectrum\]](#fig:Spectrum){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:Spectrum"}). The bound state in the \(\uparrow\downarrow\) scattering gives a tiny contribution for these parameters, and is practically not visible in Fig. [\[fig:Spectrum\]](#fig:Spectrum){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:Spectrum"}. In summary, we have studied the scattering of particles in a bilayer quasi-two-dimensional Bose gas and have shown that the interlayer scattering amplitudes depend sensitively on the separation of the layers due to novel confinement-induced bound and quasi-bound molecular states. This makes it possible to tune interlayer interactions in a wide range, by simple geometric means. The increased lifetime of the quasi-bound interlayer molecules makes it possible to observe them in the excitation spectrum of a shaking experiment. Dalibard *Acknowledgements:* We would like to thank M. Zwierlein, J. Dalibard, M. Greiner, W. Ketterle, and M. Babadi for illuminating discussions. This research has been supported by the Hungarian Research Funds under grant Nos. K105149, CNK80991. E.A.D. Acknowledges support through the Harvard-MIT CUA, the DARPA OLE program, the AFOSR MURI on Ultracold Molecules, and the ARO-MURI on Atomtronics projects.

{'timestamp': '2014-01-24T02:00:34', 'yymm': '1401', 'arxiv_id': '1401.5798', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5798'}

# Introduction We consider the problem of inferring causal relation between two random variables \(X,Y\) from a finite number of samples that have been generated according to the joint distribution (Spirtes et al. 2000). Solving the problem in a general setting is rather hard, and we need some assumptions to find the causal relation: suppose \(X,Y\) are related by \[\label{eq89} Y=f(X)+e\ ,\] where \(f\) is a function from the range of \(X\) to that of \(Y\), and the noise \(e\) is independent of \(X\), and suppose further that there is no function \(g\) from the range of \(Y\) to that of \(X\) such that \[\label{eq87} X=g(Y)+h\ ,\] where the noise \(h\) is independent of \(Y\). Then, we can infer that \(X\) causes \(Y\) but \(Y\) does not cause \(X\), and say that the causality is identifiable. On the other hand, if such a function \(g\) exists, then we conclude that we cannot infer causality, and say that \(X,Y\) are reversible. This principle (additive noise model) was proposed by Shimizu et. al, who demonstrated that causality can be found if the joint distribution of \(X,Y\) is not Gaussian when \(f\) is a linear, i.e., \(f(X)=aX\) with some constant \(a\) (LiNGAM) . The same principle applies to searching (acyclic) causal relation \[\label{eq88} X_i=f_i(X_1,\cdots,X_{i-1})+e_i\] among random variables \(X_1,\cdots,X_i\), where \(e_i\) is independent of \(X_1,\cdots,X_{i-1}\), and \(f_i\) is a linear function of \(X_1,\cdots,X_{i-1}\), \(i=1,\cdots,d\). The estimated directed acyclic graph (DAG) is found from a finite number of samples  . The idea is to find \(i\) and \(f\) such that \[e_i=X_i-f(X_1,\cdots,X_{i-1},X_{i+1},\cdots,X_d)\] is independent of \(X_1,\cdots,X_{i-1},X_{i+1},\cdots,X_d\), and remove such an \(X_i\) (sink variable); starting from \(S_d=\{X_1,\cdots,X_d\}\), if we repeat the process (removing a sink variable from \(S_{i}\) to obtain \(S_{i-1}\), \(i=d-1,\cdots,1\)), we obtain an order of \(X_1,\cdots,X_d\), and can rename the indexes \(i=1,\cdots,d\) of \(X_1\cdots,X_d\) so that Eq. ([\[eq88\]](#eq88){reference-type="ref" reference="eq88"}) holds for some \(f_1,\cdots,f_d\). The references  address using nonlinear functions as \(f\) in Eq. ([\[eq89\]](#eq89){reference-type="ref" reference="eq89"}). In another direction, extended Eq. ([\[eq88\]](#eq88){reference-type="ref" reference="eq88"}) to the case: \[X_i=f_i(X_1,\cdots,X_{i-1},X_{i+1},\cdots,X_d)+e_i\.\] However, those results assumed that the random variables are continuous. This paper addresses the case that the random variables take a finite number of values: suppose each random variable takes a value in the set \({\cal M}:=\{0,1,\cdots,m-1\}\) for an integer \(m\geq 2\), and define arithmetic over \({\cal M}\) as follows: for \(x,y\in {\cal M}\), \(x+y\) takes the value \(z\in {\cal M}\) if \(m\) divides \(x+y-z\). Such a \(z \in {\cal M}\) exists and is unique for any \(x,y\in {\cal M}\). For example, if \(m=4\), then \(3+2=1\) in \({\cal M}=\{0,1,2,3\}\). When \(m=2\), this amounts to binary data with the exclusive-or arithmetic. Such random cyclic values are abundant in our daily life. For example, directions in \([N,E,S,W]\), months in \([1,2,\dots,12]\). For two random variables \(X,Y\) that take values in \(\cal M\), we consider the additive noise model expressed by Eqs. ([\[eq89\]](#eq89){reference-type="ref" reference="eq89"})([\[eq87\]](#eq87){reference-type="ref" reference="eq87"}). The idea can be extended to the multivariate case using Eq. ([\[eq88\]](#eq88){reference-type="ref" reference="eq88"}) (*integer modulus acyclic additive noise* (IMAN) model). Recently, several papers deal with such discrete cases, and we discuss those related results in the next section. Our contributions in this paper are 1. to express necessary and sufficient conditions on causal identifiability in a bivariate IMAN model in terms of the probabilities of \(X\) and \(e\), and 2. to develop a practical algorithm for identifying a causal structure in a multivariate IMAN model under the identifiability. This IMAN often appears in circular/directional statistics . This is used in time series analysis of phase angles in the frequency domain. It has been extensively used for angular data representing an object's shape and motion as observed in ubiquitous sensing systems . In Section 2, we discuss existing results related to this paper. In Section 3, we state theorems on necessary and sufficient conditions of reversibility that is equivalent to non-identifiability for a bi-variate IMAN, and show examples illustrating those theorems. These results show that the causal identifiability of an IMAN actually holds except in rare situations. In Section 4, we propose an algorithm for identifying a causal structure in a multivariate IMAN. In Sections 5 and 6, we show numerical experiments by using artificial examples and real-world data of human body motions to compare with conventional approaches, which suggests that the proposed algorithm is actually useful in many situations. # Related Works and Discussion Peters et. al first considered the IMAN model: let \({\cal M}:=\{0,1,\cdots,m-1\}\) and \({\cal N}:=\{0,1,\cdots,n-1\}\) with \(m,n\geq 2\), and if we assumed \(X,Y\) take values in \(\cal M\) and \(\cal N\), respectively, then the causal identifiability is defined by non-existence of \(g: {\cal N}\rightarrow {\cal M}\) in Eq. ([\[eq87\]](#eq87){reference-type="ref" reference="eq87"}) such that \(h\) is independent of \(Y\) assuming existence of \(f: {\cal M}\rightarrow {\cal N}\) in Eq. ([\[eq89\]](#eq89){reference-type="ref" reference="eq89"}) such that \(e\) is independent of \(X\). The notions of causal identifiability and reversibility are the same even if \(X,Y\) are discrete. Let \({\rm supp}(X), {\rm supp}(Y), {\rm supp}(e)\) be the sets of elements \(x\in {\cal M}, y\in {\cal N}, y-f(x)\in {\cal N}\) such that \(P(X=x)>0, P(Y=y)>0, P(e=y-f(x))>0\), respectively, and denote the number of elements in set \(A\) by \(|A|\). They proved that for reversibility of a bivariate IMAN model, the following conditions are necessary (Theorem 4, ): - \(|{\rm supp}(Y)|\) divides \(|{\rm supp}(X)|\cdot |{\rm supp}(e)|\). - If \(|{\rm supp}(X)|=m\) and \(|{\rm supp}(Y)|=n\), then at least one additional equality constraint on \(P(X=x)\) and \(P(e=y-f(x))\) over \(x\in {\cal M}\) and \(y\in {\cal N}\) is required. assuming that none of \(X\), \(Y\), \(e\) are uniformly distributed and \(f\) is not constant. Although the above result suggests that it is unlikely that \(X,Y\) are reversible in general situations, no essence has been captured: exactly when causality is identified for IMAN ? We would be very pleased if we had a result on necessary and sufficient conditions of reversibility in terms of \(P(X=x)\) and \(P(e=y-f(x))\) over \(x\in {\cal M}\) and \(y\in {\cal N}\), respectively, and would feel safe because we would know exactly when reversibility occurs beforehand. We know that earthquakes occur very rare even in Japan but would be much happier if we knew exactly when they occur beforehand. When \(m=n\), assuming that \(f: {\cal M}\rightarrow {\cal M}\) is injective, we derive the necessary and sufficient conditions in the next section. Thus far, the condition was obtained for \(m=n=2\): either \(P(X=0)=P(X=1)=1/2\) or \(P(e=0)=P(e=1)=1/2\). The condition we consider in this paper extends the existing result, and eventually, the proposed algorithm will have more applications. We notice that the assumption of injectivity can be seen in many situations including the circular/directional problems. One of the most common cases is that \(f\) is a composite function of a monotonic periodic function of discrete angles and a labeling function of the angles. This frequently appears in angle relations observed in different coordinates in mechanical sensing . On the other hand, in order to establish relation between bivariate and multivariate causal identifiability, Perters et. al proposed \(({\cal B},{\cal F})\)-identifiable functional model classes (IFMOCs): Suppose that each \(F_i\) such that \(X_i=F_i(X_1,\cdots,X_{i-1},e_i)\) belongs to a subset \({\cal F}\) of \(\{{\mathbb R}^m\rightarrow {\mathbb R}|\) for some \(2\leq m\leq d\}\). Let \({\cal F}_{|2}:=\{F\in {\cal F}|F: {\mathbb R}^2\rightarrow {\mathbb R}\}\), and \({\cal P}\) the set of the distribution functions. Let \({\cal B}\) be any set of \((F,F_X,F_e)\in {\cal F}_{|2} \times {\cal P} \times {\cal P}\) such that \(Y=F(X,e)\), \(e\) is independent of \(X\), and \(Y\) is not independent of \(X\), where \(F_X, F_e\) are the distribution functions of \(X,e\), respectively. For example, for the original LiNGAM, we may take the \(\cal B\) as the set of \((F,F_X,F_e)\) such that \(F(X,e)=aX+e\), and both of \(X,e\) should not be Gaussian. Then, they prove that if the data generated process belongs to any \(({\cal B},{\cal F})\)-IFMOC, we can identify the exact causal graph from data (Theorem 2). Our result in this paper does not contradict to the theorem. Instead, we show relation between bivariate and multivariate causalities in a more specific manner (Propositions 1 and 2), and propose a method to find a sink based on bivariate causality verification. More precisely, we obtain a bi-variate IMAN for any pair of variables \(\{X_i,X_j\} \subset V\) by conditioning all the other variables except \(X_i,X_j\). In fact, has not addressed any method to find a sink variable uniquely from bi-variate independence relation between \(e_i\) and \(\{X_j\}_{j\not=i}\) as demonstrated in DirectLiNGAM . On the other hand, proposed a causal ordering method of binary variables. However, its identifiability is not insured, and its applicability is limited because the computational complexity is rather high. Recently, showed a necessary and sufficient condition on the bi-variate causal identifiability of Eq.([\[eq89\]](#eq89){reference-type="ref" reference="eq89"}) for binary variables. Given a value of \(X\), \(P(Y)\) coincides with either \(P(e=0)\) or \(P(e=1)\) irrespective of the value of \(P(X)\). They showed the reverse model Eq.([\[eq87\]](#eq87){reference-type="ref" reference="eq87"}) satisfying the same condition among \(X\), \(Y\) and \(h\) exists if and only if \(P(e=1)=P(e=0)\) when \(0<P(e)<1\). They proposed an efficient algorithm to identify a unique causal structure in a multivariate binary acyclic additive noise model named BExSAM, *i.e.*, Eq.([\[eq88\]](#eq88){reference-type="ref" reference="eq88"}) modulo \(2\), under the identifiability condition. However, BExSAM and its algorithm are not suitable for generic modular model. Our study indicates that a nontrivial condition different from the uniform \(P(e)\) is a necessary and sufficient condition for reversibility in some generic cases, discussed in the next section, and further establishes a generic condition where a uniform \(P(e)\) is a necessary and sufficient condition for reversibility. # Analysis on Bi-variate Identifiability {#suzuki} We show necessary and sufficient conditions for the reversibility of a bi-variate IMAN (1)(2), where \(X,Y,e\) take values in \({\cal M}\). For simplicity, its modulus \(m\) is a prime or its power, and \(f:{\cal M} \rightarrow {\cal M}\) is injective. The notation \(P(X=i)=p_i\) and \(P(e=j)=q_j\) is used for brevity, and \(0<p_i<1\) is assumed while \(0\leq q_i\leq 1\) for \(i,j=0,\cdots,m-1\), which does not loose any generality since \(X\) is not constant in general situations. A typical real example arises from human body motion data demonstrated in section 6. We first present some lemmas on the reversibility for couple moduli to help understanding theorems presented later. Proof. See Appendix [\[proofexlem\]](#proofexlem){reference-type="ref" reference="proofexlem"}.\(\bsquare\) Proof. See Appendix [\[proofrev3lem\]](#proofrev3lem){reference-type="ref" reference="proofrev3lem"}.\(\bsquare\) Proof. See Appendix [\[proofrev4lem\]](#proofrev4lem){reference-type="ref" reference="proofrev4lem"}.\(\bsquare\) These lemmas are now extended to a theorem on a necessary and sufficient condition for bi-variate causal reversibility of an IMAN covering more generic moduli \(m\). Before presenting the theorem, we need to introduce the notion of "*balanced distribution*" of \(\{p_i\}\). We say \(p_0,\dots,p_{m-1}\) is balanced with respect to \(c\) dividing \(m\), if all the rows in the following matrix are identical for some constants \(C_0,\dots,C_{c-1}\) and \(g: \{0,1,\cdots,c-1\}\rightarrow \{0,c,\cdots,m-c\}\). \[\left(\begin{array}{cccc} p_{0+g(0)}/C_0&p_{0+c+g(0)}/C_0&\dots&p_{0+m-c+g(0)}/C_0\\ p_{1+g(1)}/C_1&p_{1+c+g(1)}/C_1&\dots&p_{1+m-c+g(1)}/C_1\\ \cdots&\cdots&\cdots&\cdots\\ p_{c-2+g(c-2)}/C_{c-2}&p_{2c-2+g(c-2)}/C_{c-2}&\dots&p_{m-2+g(c-2)}/C_{c-2}\\ p_{c-1+g(c-1)}/C_{c-1}&p_{2c-1+g(c-1)}/C_{c-1}&\dots&p_{m-1+g(c-1)}/C_{c-1}\\ \end{array}\right).\] We denote the condition by \(P_c\). For example, suppose \(m=4\) as in Lemma 3, \(P_2\) says the rows should coincide in either \[\left( \begin{array}{cc} p_0/(p_0+p_2)&p_2/(p_0+p_2)\\ p_1/(p_1+p_3)&p_3/(p_1+p_3)\\ \end{array} \right)\ {\rm or}\ \left( \begin{array}{cc} p_2/(p_0+p_2)&p_0/(p_0+p_2)\\ p_1/(p_1+p_3)&p_3/(p_1+p_3)\\ \end{array} \right),\] corresponding to the \(g:\{0,1\}\rightarrow \{0,2\}\) such that either \(g(0)=g(1)\) or \(g(0)\not=g(1)\), which is equivalent to either \({p_0}/{p_1}={p_2}/{p_3}\) or \({p_2}/{p_1}={p_0}/{p_3}\), respectively. On the other hand, we define \(c(q_0,\cdots,q_{m-1})\) by the smallest \(c\geq 1\) such that \(q_j>0 \Longleftrightarrow q_{j+c}>0\). For example, for \(m=8\), 1. \(q_0,\cdots,q_7>0 \Longrightarrow c(q_0,\cdots,q_7)=1\), 2. \(q_0,q_2,q_4,q_6=0, q_1,q_3,q_5,q_7>0 \Longrightarrow c(q_0,\cdots,q_7)=2\), 3. \(q_0,q_4=0, q_1,q_2,q_3,q_5,q_6,q_7>0 \Longrightarrow c(q_0,\cdots,q_7)=4\), 4. \(q_j=1\) for some \(j \Longrightarrow c(q_0,\cdots,q_7)=8\), 5. \(q_j=0\) for just one \(j \Longrightarrow c(q_0,\cdots,q_7)=8\), and for \(m=4\) as in Lemma 3, if \(q_0=q_2=0\) and \(q_1=q_3\), then \(c(q_0,q_1,q_2,q_3)=2\). Proof. See Appendix [\[proofth1\]](#proofth1){reference-type="ref" reference="proofth1"}.\(\bsquare\)\ Lemmas [\[exlem\]](#exlem){reference-type="ref" reference="exlem"} and [\[rev3lem\]](#rev3lem){reference-type="ref" reference="rev3lem"} are easily derived using this theorem. Furthermore, applying \(m=4\) to this theorem, we obtain the ten conditions in Lemma [\[m=4\]](#m=4){reference-type="ref" reference="m=4"} as follows. The following two corollaries, which are easily derived from Theorem [\[th1\]](#th1){reference-type="ref" reference="th1"}, show simpler necessary and sufficient conditions under some practical assumptions. Proof. When \(m\) is a prime, \(c\) is either 1 or \(m\) in Theorem [\[th1\]](#th1){reference-type="ref" reference="th1"}. If \(c=1\), then \(P_1\) does not require any condition, so that Theorem [\[th1\]](#th1){reference-type="ref" reference="th1"} reads either \(p_0 =\dots =p_{m-1}\) or \(q_0 =\dots =q_{m-1}\). If \(c=m\), which is equivalent to \(q_k=1\) for some \(k\), no condition is required other than this. \(\bsquare\) Proof. When \(q_0,\dots,q_{m-1}>0\), which means \(c=1\) by the definition of \(c(q_0,\dots,q_{m-1})\) and Theorem [\[th1\]](#th1){reference-type="ref" reference="th1"}, \(P_1\) does not require any condition. Thus, Theorem [\[th1\]](#th1){reference-type="ref" reference="th1"} reads either \(p_0 =\dots =p_{m-1}\) or \(q_0 =\dots =q_{m-1}\).\(\bsquare\)\ These results ensure that the causal identifiability of a bi-variate IMAN holds except for a finite number of special conditions to occur in practice. If the modulus \(m\) does not meet the condition in Theorem [\[th1\]](#th1){reference-type="ref" reference="th1"}, there are some cases where the reversibility holds even if both \(\{p_i\}\) and \(\{q_j\}\) are nonuniform and nonzero. In Example 2, reversibility is due to shared parameter \(r\), which is consistent with Peters et. al \[15\] who suggested that reversibility requires additional equality condition among \(\{p_i\}\) and \(\{q_j\}\). # IMAN Algorithm {#suzuki} We assume that there exist \(i\in \{1,\cdots,d\}\) and \(f\) such that \[e_i:=X_i-f(\{X_j\}_{j\not=i})\] is independent of \(\{X_j\}_{j\not=i}\). In \[14\], we speculate that the condition (multivariate causal identifiability) reduces to bivariate causal identifiability that \(e_i\) is independent of \(X_j\) given \(\{X_k\}_{k\not=i,j}\) for all \(j\not=i\). We say that such \(X_i\) and a minimal subset of \(\{X_j\}_{j\not=i}\) on which \(f\) depends are a *sink* and a *parent set*, respectively. In this paper, we show in Proposition 1 that the claim is true as long as the probabilities of \(e_i\) are positive. Besides, based on the strong support for bi-variate causal identifiability in Section 3 and Proposition 1, we ignore the reversible cases. From those considerations, we propose an algorithm to find a unique causal structure in an IMAN from a given modular data set \(D\). Figure 1 outlines the proposed algorithm which is an extension of \[17\] to cover the IMAN modulo \(m\geq 2\). The algorithm uniquely find a sink variable, which is different from \[9\]\[15\]. The first step calculates a frequency table \(FT\) from \(D\). If we have samples of sufficiently large size, the values of relative frequency converge to the true probabilities. Steps 3 and 4 find a sink \(i(k)\) and its parent set \(\pi(k)\subseteq V\backslash \{i(k)\}\) given \(FT\) and \(V\), respectively, where \(V\) is a subset of \(\{1,\cdots,d\}\). Step 5 removes the estimated sink \(i(k)\) from \(V\), and update \(FT\) so that the frequency values can be expressed for the updated set \(V\) excluding \(i\) (marginalization). This reduces the size of the model by one in the next cycle. The entire list \(\{(i(k),\pi(k))\}_{k=1}^d\) in the output expresses a DAG structure of the IMAN. ## Finding Sink and Parent Set The proposed method is based on the following observation: (Proof: see for example.) (Proof: immediate from Lemma 4). Proposition 1 implies that we can check that \(X_i\) is a sink by verifying \(e_i\) to be independent of \(\{X_h\}_{h\not=i}\), and that finding the sink node is as likely as bivariate causal identifiability. In find_sink, the conditional probability \(P(X_i=x_i|\{X_j=x_k\}_{j\not=i})\) is estimated from FT (we write the value by \(\hat{P}(X_i=x_i|\{X_j=x_k\}_{j\not=i})\)). Suppose that \(X_i\) is a sink node. Then, the probability of \(e_i=X_i-f(\{X_j\}_{j\not=i})\) is the same for \(\{X_j=x_j'\}_{j\not=i}\) and \(\{X_j=x_j''\}_{j\not=i}\). If we choose \(x_i'\) and \(x_i''\) such that \(\hat{P}(X_i=x_i'|\{X_j=x_k'\}_{j\not=i})\) and \(\hat{P}(X_i=x_i''|\{X_j=x_k''\}_{j\not=i})\) are maximized, respectively. Then, it is likely that \[\label{eq4} x_i'-x_i''=f(\{x'_j\}_{j\not=i})-f(\{x''_j\}_{j\not=i})\] if the sample size \(n\) is large. Let \(c\) be the value of ([\[eq4\]](#eq4){reference-type="ref" reference="eq4"}) Then, the distributions of \(X_i\) and \(X_i+c\) given \(\{X_j=x_j'\}_{j\not=i}\) and \(\{X_j=x_j''\}_{j\not=i}\), respectively, should be the same if the estimation of \(c\) is correct. To this end, we apply the data to the G-test which distinguishes whether \(P(\cdot|A)=P(\cdot|B)\) or not for disjoint events \(A,B\) from data. The G-test calculates the G-value: \[\begin{aligned} &&2\sum_k{c_n(C_k\cap A)}\log \{\frac{c_n(C_k\cap A)}{c_n(A)}/\frac{c_n(C_k)}{n}\}\nonumber\\ &+&2\sum_k{c_n(C_k\cap B)}\log \{\frac{c_n(C_k\cap B)}{c_n(B)}/\frac{c_n(C_k)}{n}\}\, \label{eq90} \end{aligned}\] where \(c_n(\cdot)\) is the frequency of the event, and \(\{C_k\}\) are disjoint events covering the whole events (\(\cup_k C_k=\Omega\)). The G-test is more correct than the \(\chi^2\)-test that calculates an approximation of ([\[eq90\]](#eq90){reference-type="ref" reference="eq90"}). In our case, in order to prove Independence, we compare the values \(\hat{P}(\cdot|\{X_j=x_j\}_{j\not=i})\) for all \(\{x_j\}_{j\not=i}\) in \({\cal M}^{d-1}\). Once the sink \(i(k)\) is obtained, we find the parent set \(\pi(k)\subseteq V\backslash\{i\}\) assuming that the estimated \(i(k)\) is correct. We find the parent based on the following observation: (Proof: immediate from Lemma 4). To this end, for each \(j\not=i(k)\), we compute \(\hat{P}(X_{i(k)},X_j|\{X_h=x_h\}_{h\not=i(k),j})\) for all \(\{x_h\}_{h\not=i(k),j}\in {\cal M}^{d-2}\) to test if \(X_{(i)}\) and \(X_j\) are independent via the G-test given \(\{X_h=x_h\}_{h\not=i(k),j}\). We see that \(j\in \pi(k)\) if and only if \(X_{i(k)}\) and \(X_j\) are not independent given at least one \(\{x_h\}_{h\not=i(k),j} \in {\cal M}^{d-2}\). We test all the tables of \(\{x_h\}_{h\not=i(k),j} \in {\cal M}^{d-2}\) by multiple comparison tests . Throughout this paper, find_parent uses the significance level \(\alpha=0.05\) and repeats the procedure for all \(j\not={i(k)}\) to enumerate all the values of \(\pi(k)\). ## Computational Complexity {#complex} The table FT is of size \(m^d\). Hence, the space complexity is \(O(m^d)\). The critical task in find_sink is to compute \(m \times m^{d-1}\) conditional probability tables for \({i(k)}\), and this is repeated at most \(d\) times. The critical task in find_parent is the \(m^{d-2}\) times computation of \(m \times m\) conditional probability tables for \(j\not=i(k)\), and this is repeated \(d-1\) times at most. These are further repeated \(d\) times in the main algorithm shown in Fig.[\[mainalg\]](#mainalg){reference-type="ref" reference="mainalg"}. Accordingly, the total time complexity is \(O(d^2m^d)\). We require that the data size \(n\) is near the size of \(FT\), *i.e.*, \(m^d\). Therefore, when \(n \simeq m^d\), the complexity is virtually \(O(d^2n)\) which is comparable or better than previous work. For example, DirectLiNGAM  which is one of the most efficient causal inference algorithm requires \(O(d^3n)\). # Experimental Evaluation In this section, we evaluate the basic performance of our algorithm by using artificial data. Let \(d\) be the number of variables \(\{X_i\}_{i=1}^d\), \(m\) the size of the modulus domain \({\cal M}\), \(n\) the number of samples, \(p_a\) the probability that \(X_{i}\) is a parent of \(X_{j}\) for each \(i\not=j\), and \(\{q_i\}_{i=0}^{m-1}\) with \(\sum_{i=0}^{m-1}q_i=1\) the noise distribution. For each sink \(i\) with parent set \(\pi\), \(f_{i}\) is a function of \(\{X_j\}_{j\in \pi}\). We add noise \(e_i\) to \(f_{i}(\{x_j\}_{j\in \pi})\) to obtain \(X_{i}=x_{i}\) given \(\{X_j=x_j\}_{j\in \pi}\). By repeating the process for \(i=1,\cdots,d\), we obtain one realization \(\{X_i=x_i\}_{i=1}^d\). For simplicity, we assume that all the noise \(\{e_i\}_{i=1}^d\) share the same distribution. Furthermore, by generating \(\{X_i=x_i\}_{i=1}^d\) \(n\) times and randomly changing the indexes \((i)_{1\leq i\leq d}\) of \(\{X_i\}_{i=1}^d\) into some \((i(k))_{1\leq k\leq d}\), we obtain data set \(D\). In our experiments, we estimate \(\{i(k),\pi(k)\}_{k=1}^d\) from the data set \(D\) obtained above. ::: # Real-world Applications {#realapp} We analyzed human body orientation data of MPI08_Database[^1] . Various indoor motions of a human measured with eight movie cameras and five orientation sensors are stored in the data. Five angle sensors are attached to various parts of the body between knees and ankles, between wrists and hands and between chest and neck, and angles measured with respect to a global inertial coordinate frame at 40Hz which is suitable to describe human body orientation in his/her view. We obtained angles \([roll, pitch, yaw]\) from each snapshot output: \(roll\) is the rotation angle around the rotation axis; \(pitch\) is the look up angle between the axis and a horizontal plain; and \(yaw\) is the horizontal direction angle of the axis. \(roll\) and \(yaw\) take cyclic values in \([0,2\pi)\), whereas \(pitch\) takes values in \([-\pi/2,+\pi/2]\). We applied our IMAN algorithm to \(roll\) of the data sets; "ab_01_01" and "ab_10_01." The former records a counterclockwise walking motion over 406 time steps. The latter records two cartwheel motions over 580 time steps, and we analyzed the first 200 time steps on the leftward cartwheel motion. We discretized each \(roll\) into 3 equi-width intervals of \([-\pi,-\pi/6)\), \([-\pi/6,+\pi/6)\), \([+\pi/6,+\pi)\). The critical \(m^d=3^5=243\) is comparable with \(n=406\) and \(200\) for both data sets. Figure [\[eps2\]](#eps2){reference-type="ref" reference="eps2"} shows a causal network on ab_01_01 by the IMAN algorithm. This result is well interpreted in that the right leg, its orientation being measured by rknee_rankle senor, takes the initiative, and the left leg and right hand, as measured by lknee_lankle and rwrist_rhand sensors respectively, follow the right leg motion, and are further followed by the neck and left hand, as measured by chest_neck and lwrist_lhand sensors respectively. Figure [\[eps3\]](#eps3){reference-type="ref" reference="eps3"} shows the result on ab_10_01. To initiate the leftward cartwheel, the right leg is used first to push off from the floor. The motion then influences the orientation of his left leg, and subsequently planting of these left hand on the floor hand to support the body in the rotation. In turn, the right hand is planted in similar manner as the body continues to rotate. The neck always follows these motions to maintain body balance. Because these are time series representing the body motion dynamics, we also applied VAR (Vector Auto-Regressive) (Fig. [\[eps4\]](#eps4){reference-type="ref" reference="eps4"})  and DirectLiNGAM (Fig. [\[eps5\]](#eps5){reference-type="ref" reference="eps5"})  to \(pitch\) by assuming \(pitch\) shares similar causality with \(roll\), because no approaches are applicable to the modular \(roll\). We used the 1st order VAR model selected by the final prediction error (FPE) in Fig. [\[eps4\]](#eps4){reference-type="ref" reference="eps4"}. In both figures, the causal networks are drawn by the matrix elements above a certain threshold level. The dotted edges are outputs of VAR and DirectLiNGAM that is not in the IMAN output; the dashed edges are the output of IMAN but not in the others. Though VAR indicates cycles, 4 out of 6 edges of IMAN are supported. DirectLiNGAM's causal order is consistent except lknee_lankle. Though these are not from \(roll\), they are quite consistent with IMAN. We analyzed some other data obtained from kicking motions, and produced a similar consistency. # Discussion and Conclusion In this paper, we presented necessary and sufficient conditions for bivariate causal identifiability in IMAN, and actually affirm that causality can be identified except in rare cases. Our result locates exactly when the reversible cases occur. In addition, we relate bivariate and multivariate causal identifiability in more precise manner for IMANN (Propositions 1 and 2). As a result, we developed a practical way to find a sink and its parent set. The algorithm needs a sufficient number of samples compared with \(m^d\) to verify independence when each of \(X_1,\cdots,X_d\) takes a value among \(m\) values. The computational complexity is \(O(d^2m^d)\), and it is reasonable to say that the value \(d\) should be at most 10 for small \(m\), which is according to our experiments in this paper (the value \(m\) can be small in practical situations by reducing the quantization level). If the sample size \(n\) is small, we need to improve estimation of FT. One possibility is to construct a Bayesian measure to deal with each sample set, and we expect to obtain more robust results even for small \(m\). Then, we can avoid checking independence via the G-test. The most important direction for future study is to seek a causal model and its causal identifiability conditions on continuous and cyclic data, such as that used in section [6](#realapp){reference-type="ref" reference="realapp"}. If we address these issues, our approach can be extended so that we do not need to discretize these data to integers. Recent studies in directional statistics provided some analyses on distributions of circular/directional variables . [^1]: The data is accessible at \(http://www.tnt.uni-hannover.de/project/MPI08\_\) \(Database/\).

{'timestamp': '2014-01-23T02:07:42', 'yymm': '1401', 'arxiv_id': '1401.5625', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5625'}

# Introduction {#sec-introduction} The scope of this work is the constraint-based synthesis of termination arguments. In our setting, we consider *linear loop programs*, which are specified by a boolean combination of affine-linear inequalities over the program variables. This allows for both, deterministic and non-deterministic updates of the program variables. An example of a linear loop program is given in . Usually, linear loop programs do not occur as stand-alone programs. Instead, they are generated as a finite representation of an infinite path in a control flow graph. For example, in (potentially spurious) counterexamples in termination analysis , non-termination analysis , stability analysis , or cost analysis . We introduce the notion of *linear ranking templates* (). These are parameterized relations specified by linear inequalities such that any assignment to the parameters yields a well-founded relation. This notion is general enough to encompass all existing methods for linear loop programs that use constraint-based synthesis of ranking functions of various kinds (see for an assessment). Moreover, ours is the first method for synthesis of lexicographic ranking functions that does not require a mapping between loop disjuncts and lexicographic components. In this paper we present the following linear ranking templates. - The *multiphase ranking template* specifies a ranking function that proceeds through a fixed number of phases in the program execution. Each phase is ranked by an affine-linear function; when this function becomes non-positive, we move on to the next phase (). - The *piecewise ranking template* specifies a ranking function that is a piecewise affine-linear function with affine-linear predicates to discriminate between the pieces (). - The *lexicographic ranking template* specifies a lexicographic ranking function that corresponds to a tuple of affine-linear functions together with a lexicographic ordering on the tuple (). These linear ranking templates can be used as a 'construction kit' for composing linear ranking templates that enable more complex ranking functions (). Moreover, variations on the linear ranking templates presented here can be used and completely different templates could be conceived. Our method is described in and can be summarized as follows. The input is a linear loop program as well as a linear ranking template. From these we construct a constraint to the parameters of the template. With Motzkin's Theorem we can transform the constraint into a purely existentially quantified constraint (). This \(\exists\)-constraint is then passed to an SMT solver which checks it for satisfiability. A positive result implies that the program terminates. Furthermore, a satisfying assignment will yield a ranking function, which constitutes a termination argument for the given linear loop program. Related approaches invoke Farkas' Lemma for the transformation into \(\exists\)-constraints . The piecewise and the lexicographic ranking template contain both strict and non-strict inequalities, yet only non-strict inequalities can be transformed using Farkas' Lemma. We solve this problem by introducing the use of [Motzkin's Transposition Theorem](#thm-motzkin), a generalization of Farkas' Lemma. As a side effect, this also enables both, strict and non-strict inequalities in the program syntax. To our knowledge, all of the aforementioned methods can be improved by the application of Motzkin's Theorem instead of Farkas' Lemma. Our method is complete in the following sense. If there is a ranking function of the form specified by the given linear ranking template, then our method will discover this ranking function. In other words, the existence of a solution is never lost in the process of transforming the constraint. In contrast to some related methods  the constraint we generate is not linear, but rather a nonlinear algebraic constraint. Theoretically, this constraint can be decided in exponential time . Much progress on nonlinear SMT solvers has been made and present-day implementations routinely solve nonlinear constraints of various sizes . A related setting to linear loop programs are *linear lasso programs*. These consist of a linear loop program and a program stem, both of which are specified by boolean combinations of affine-linear inequalities over the program variables. Our method can be extended to linear lasso programs through the addition of affine-linear inductive invariants, analogously to related approaches . # Preliminaries {#sec-preliminaries} In this paper we use \(\mathbb{K}\) to denote a field that is either the rational numbers \(\mathbb{Q}\) or the real numbers \(\mathbb{R}\). We use ordinal numbers according to the definition in. The first infinite ordinal is denoted by \(\omega\); the finite ordinals coincide with the natural numbers, therefore we will use them interchangeably. ## Motzkin's Transposition Theorem {#ssec-motzkin} Intuitively, Motzkin's Transposition Theorem  states that a given system of linear inequalities has no solution if and only if a contradiction can be derived via a positive linear combination of the inequalities. If \(\ell\) is set to \(1\) in , we obtain the affine version of Farkas' Lemma . Therefore Motzkin's Theorem is strictly superior to Farkas' Lemma, as it allows for a combination of both strict and non-strict inequalities. Moreover, it is logically optimal in the sense that it enables transformation of *any* universally quantified formula from the theory of linear arithmetic. ## Linear Loop Programs {#ssec-loops} In this work, we consider programs that consist of a single loop. We use binary relations over the program's states to define its transition relation. We denote by \(x\) the vector of \(n\) variables \((x_1, \ldots, x_n)^T \in \mathbb{K}^n\) corresponding to program states and by \(x' = (x_1', \ldots, x_n')^T \in \mathbb{K}^n\) the variables of the next state. Geometrically the relation \(\loopt\) corresponds to a union of convex polyhedra. We represent this as the following linear loop program: \[\begin{aligned} &(q > 0 \;\land\; y > 0 \;\land\; y' = y \;\land\; q' = q-y-1) \\ \lor\; &(q > 0 \;\land\; y \leq 0 \;\land\; y' = y \;\land\; q' = q + y-1) \end{aligned}\] This linear loop program is not conjunctive. Furthermore, there is no infinite sequence of states \(x_0, x_1, \ldots\) such that for all \(i \geq 0\), the two successive states \((x_i, x_{i+1})\) are contained in the relation \(\loopt\). Hence the relation \(\loopt(x, x')\) is well-founded and the linear loop program terminates. The next lemma states that we can prove termination of a given linear loop program by checking that this program's transition relation is included in an instantiation of a linear ranking template. In order to establish that a formula conforming to the syntactic requirements is indeed a ranking template, we must show the well-foundedness of its instantiations. According to the following lemma, we can do this by showing that an assignment to \(D\) and \(F\) gives rise to a ranking function. A similar argument was given in; we provide significantly shortened proof by use of the Recursion Theorem, along the lines of. We use assignments to a template's parameters and affine-linear function symbols to construct a ranking function. These functions are real-valued and we will transform them into functions with codomain \(\omega\) in the following way. For better readability we used this notation which does not explicitly refer to \(\delta\). In our presentation the step size \(\delta\) is always clear from the context in which an ordinal ranking equivalent \(\widehat{f}\) is used. The assignment from to \(\delta\) and \(f\) makes the implication [\[eq-rt\]](#eq-rt){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq-rt"} valid. In order to invoke to show that the linear loop program given in terminates, we need to prove that the Podelski-Rybalchenko ranking template is a linear ranking template. We use the following technical lemma. An immediate consequence of this lemma is that the Podelski-Rybalchenko ranking template is a linear ranking template: any assignment \(\nu\) to \(\delta\) and \(f\) satisfies the requirements of . Consequently, \(\widehat{f}\) is a ranking function for \(\nu(\T)\), and by this implies that \(\nu(\T)\) is well-founded. # Examples of Ranking Templates {#sec-ranking-templates-examples} ## Multiphase Ranking Template {#ssec-rt-multiphase} The multiphase ranking template is targeted at programs that go through a finite number of phases in their execution. Each phase is ranked with an affine-linear function and the phase is considered to be completed once this function becomes non-positive. We say that the multiphase ranking function given by an assignment to \(f_1, \ldots, f_k\) and \(\delta_1, \ldots, \delta_k\) *is in phase \(i\)*, iff \(f_i(x) > 0\) and \(f_j(x) \leq 0\) for all \(j < i\). The condition [\[eq-rt-multiphase2\]](#eq-rt-multiphase2){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq-rt-multiphase2"} states that there is always some \(i\) such that the multiphase ranking function is in phase \(i\). [\[eq-rt-multiphase3\]](#eq-rt-multiphase3){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq-rt-multiphase3"} and [\[eq-rt-multiphase4\]](#eq-rt-multiphase4){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq-rt-multiphase4"} state that if we are in a phase \(\geq i\), then \(f_i\) has to be decreasing by at least \(\delta_i > 0\). Note that the \(1\)-phase ranking template coincides with the Podelski-Rybalchenko ranking template. Multiphase ranking functions are related to *eventually negative expressions* introduced by Bradley, Manna, and Sipma . However, in contrast to our approach, they require a template tree that specifies in detail how each loop transition interacts with each phase. yields a \(2\)-phase ranking function for this program. ## Piecewise Ranking Template {#ssec-rt-pw} The piecewise ranking template formalizes a ranking function that is defined piecewise using affine-linear predicates to discriminate the pieces. We call the affine-linear function symbols \(\{ g_i \mid 1 \leq i \leq k \}\) *discriminators* and the affine-linear function symbols \(\{ f_i \mid 1 \leq i \leq k \}\) *ranking pieces*. The disjunction [\[eq-rt-pw4\]](#eq-rt-pw4){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq-rt-pw4"} states that the discriminators cover all states; in other words, the piecewise defined ranking function is a total function. Given the \(k\) different pieces \(f_1, \ldots, f_k\) and a state \(x\), we use \(f_i\) as a ranking function only if \(g_i(x) \geq 0\) holds. This choice need not be unambiguous; the discriminators may overlap. If they do, we can use any one of their ranking pieces. According to [\[eq-rt-pw3\]](#eq-rt-pw3){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq-rt-pw3"}, all ranking pieces are positive-valued and by [\[eq-rt-pw2\]](#eq-rt-pw2){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq-rt-pw2"} piece transitions are well-defined: the rank of the new state is always less than the rank any of the ranking pieces assigned to the old state. ## Lexicographic Ranking Template {#ssec-rt-lex} Lexicographic ranking functions consist of lexicographically ordered components of affine-linear functions. A state is mapped to a tuple of values such that the loop transition leads to a decrease with respect to the lexicographic ordering for this tuple. Therefore no function may increase unless a function of a lower index decreases. Additionally, at every step, there must be at least one function that decreases. Several different definitions for lexicographic ranking functions have been utilized ; a comparison can be found in. Each of these definitions for lexicographic linear ranking functions can be formalized using linear ranking templates; in this publication we are following the definition of. The conjunction [\[eq-rt-lex2\]](#eq-rt-lex2){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq-rt-lex2"} establishes that all lexicographic components \(f_1, \ldots, f_k\) have positive values. In every step, at least one component must decrease according to [\[eq-rt-lex4\]](#eq-rt-lex4){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq-rt-lex4"}. From [\[eq-rt-lex3\]](#eq-rt-lex3){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq-rt-lex3"} follows that all functions corresponding to components of smaller index than the decreasing function may increase. ## Composition of Templates {#ssec-composition} The multiphase ranking template, the piecewise ranking template, and the lexicographic ranking template defined in the previous sections can be used as a 'construction kit' for more general linear ranking templates. Each of our templates contains lower bounds ([\[eq-rt-multiphase2\]](#eq-rt-multiphase2){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq-rt-multiphase2"}, [\[eq-rt-pw3\]](#eq-rt-pw3){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq-rt-pw3"}, [\[eq-rt-pw4\]](#eq-rt-pw4){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq-rt-pw4"}, and [\[eq-rt-lex2\]](#eq-rt-lex2){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq-rt-lex2"}) and decreasing behavior ([\[eq-rt-multiphase3\]](#eq-rt-multiphase3){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq-rt-multiphase3"}, [\[eq-rt-multiphase4\]](#eq-rt-multiphase4){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq-rt-multiphase4"}, [\[eq-rt-pw2\]](#eq-rt-pw2){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq-rt-pw2"}, [\[eq-rt-lex3\]](#eq-rt-lex3){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq-rt-lex3"}, and [\[eq-rt-lex4\]](#eq-rt-lex4){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq-rt-lex4"}). We can compose templates by replacing the lower bound conditions and decreasing behavior conditions to affine-linear function symbols in our linear ranking templates with the corresponding conditions of another template. This is possible because linear ranking templates allow arbitrary boolean combination of inequalities and are closed under this kind of substitution. For example, we can construct a template for a lexicographic ranking function whose lexicographic components are multiphase functions instead of affine-linear functions (see ). This encompasses the approach applied by Bradley et al. . # Synthesizing Ranking Functions {#sec-rf-synthesis} Our method for ranking function synthesis can be stated as follows. We have a finite pool of linear ranking templates. This pool will include the multiphase, piecewise, and lexicographic ranking templates in various sizes and possibly combinations thereof. Given a linear loop program whose termination we want to prove, we select a linear ranking template from the pool. With this template we build the constraint [\[eq-rt\]](#eq-rt){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq-rt"} to the linear ranking template's parameters. If this constraint is satisfiable, this gives rise to a ranking function according to . Otherwise, we try again using the next linear ranking template from the pool until the pool has been exhausted. In this case, the given linear loop program does not have a ranking function of the form specified by any of the pool's linear ranking templates and the proof of the program's termination failed. See for a specification of our method in pseudocode. Following related approaches , we transform the \(\exists\forall\)-constraint [\[eq-rt\]](#eq-rt){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq-rt"} into an \(\exists\)-constraint. This transformation makes the constraint more easily solvable because it reduces the number of non-linear operations in the constraint: every application of an affine-linear function symbol \(f\) corresponds to a non-linear term \(\tr{s_f} x + t_f\). ## Constraint Transformation using Motzkin's Theorem {#ssec-constraint} Fix a linear loop program \(\loopt\) and a linear ranking template \(\T\) with parameters \(D\) and affine-linear function symbols \(F\). We write \(\loopt\) in disjunctive normal form and \(\T\) in conjunctive normal form: \[\begin{aligned} \loopt(x, x') &\equiv \bigvee_{i \in I} A_i \abovebelow{x}{x'} \leq b_i \\ \T(x, x') &\equiv \bigwedge_{j \in J} \bigvee_{\ell \in L_j} \T_{j,\ell}(x, x') \end{aligned}\] We prove the termination of \(\loopt\) by solving the constraint [\[eq-rt\]](#eq-rt){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq-rt"}. This constraint is implicitly existentially quantified over the parameters \(D\) and the parameters corresponding to the affine-linear function symbols \(F\). \[\begin{aligned} \forall x, x'.\; \Big( \big( \bigvee_{i \in I} A_i \abovebelow{x}{x'} \leq b_i \big) \rightarrow \big( \bigwedge_{j \in J} \bigvee_{\ell \in L_j} \T_{j,\ell}(x, x') \big) \Big) \label{eq-constraint} \end{aligned}\] First, we transform the constraint [\[eq-constraint\]](#eq-constraint){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq-constraint"} into an equivalent constraint of the form required by Motzkin's Theorem. \[\begin{aligned} \bigwedge_{i \in I} \bigwedge_{j \in J} \forall x, x'.\; \neg \Big( A_i \abovebelow{x}{x'} \leq b_i \;\land\; \big( \bigwedge_{\ell \in L_j} \neg\T_{j,\ell}(x, x') \big) \Big) \label{eq-constraint2} \end{aligned}\] Now, [Motzkin's Transposition Theorem](#thm-motzkin) will transform the constraint [\[eq-constraint2\]](#eq-constraint2){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq-constraint2"} into an equivalent existentially quantified constraint. This \(\exists\)-constraint is then checked for satisfiability. If an assignment is found, it gives rise to a ranking function. Conversely, if no assignment exists, then there cannot be an instantiation of the linear ranking template and thus no ranking function of the kind formalized by the linear ranking template. In this sense our method is sound and complete. # Related Work {#sec-related-work} The first complete method of ranking function synthesis for linear loop programs through constraint solving was due Podelski and Rybalchenko . Their approach considers termination arguments in form of affine-linear ranking functions and requires only linear constraint solving. We explained the relation to their method in . Bradley, Manna, and Sipma propose a related approach for linear lasso programs . They introduce affine-linear inductive supporting invariants to handle the stem. Their termination argument is a lexicographic ranking function with each component corresponding to one loop disjunct. This not only requires non-linear constraint solving, but also an ordering on the loop disjuncts. The authors extend this approach in by the use of *template trees*. These trees allow each lexicographic component to have a ranking function that decreases not necessarily in every step, but *eventually*. In the method of Podelski and Rybalchenko is extended. Utilizing supporting invariants analogously to Bradley et al., affine-linear ranking functions are synthesized. Due to the restriction to non-decreasing invariants, the generated constraints are linear. A collection of example-based explanations of constraint-based verification techniques can be found in. This includes the generation of ranking functions, interpolants, invariants, resource bounds and recurrence sets. In Ben-Amram and Genaim discuss the synthesis of affine-linear and lexicographic ranking functions for linear loop programs over the integers. They prove that this problem is generally co-NP-complete and show that several special cases admit a polynomial time complexity.

{'timestamp': '2014-01-22T02:10:01', 'yymm': '1401', 'arxiv_id': '1401.5338', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5338'}

# Introduction The spontaneous emission rate of an atom depends on the environment with which it is coupled. Changing the atom environment substantially alters the density of states, leading to suppression or enhancement of the spontaneous emission rate. This phenomenon was first predicted by Purcell in his seminal work. When the atom is coupled on-resonance with a cavity, its relaxation rate is enhanced due to increased vacuum fluctuations at the atom frequency. On the other hand, if the atom is off-resonant from the cavity frequency, the spontaneous emission rate can be significantly suppressed. A very similar effect (thus often called the Purcell effect) occurs in circuit quantum electrodynamics (QED) systems when a superconducting qubit (artificial atom) is coupled to a microwave resonator, which in turn is coupled to a transmission line. The qubit energy relaxation via the resonator is one of the main processes limiting the qubit lifetime. As demonstrated experimentally, even coupling with resonator modes that are far detuned from the qubit frequency can significantly reduce the qubit lifetime. The Purcell effect is also one of the limiting factors in achieving a high-fidelity qubit readout. Several proposals have been put forward to reduce or eliminate the resonator-induced qubit relaxation rate (Purcell rate) either by designing a Purcell filter, engineering a Purcell-protected qubit, or using a tunable coupler that decouples the transmission line from the resonator during the qubit-resonator interaction, thereby avoiding the Purcell effect altogether. In this work, we analyze the effect of an external microwave drive on the qubit relaxation rate caused by the loss of photons to the resonator environment. It is known that the external drive can increase the qubit relaxation rate (and also cause qubit excitation) due to the "dressed dephasing" effect, which essentially converts pure dephasing into photon-number-dependent energy relaxation (the dressed dephasing was observed experimentally ). In our analysis we assume the absence of pure dephasing, so that there is no dressed dephasing, and we can focus on the question of how the standard Purcell effect changes in the presence of an additional drive. In spite of the general importance of this question, we are not aware of any direct discussion of the Purcell effect in the presence of drive, except for an indirect analysis in Ref.Ẇe consider a superconducting qubit coupled to a resonator, which can leak photons into a transmission line (Fig. [\[fig-model\]](#fig-model){reference-type="ref" reference="fig-model"}). The resonator is driven on resonance by an external microwave field, while the qubit is significantly detuned from the resonator frequency, so that there is no direct effect of the drive on the qubit. Nevertheless, the presence of microwave photons in the resonator (with average number \(\bar{n}\)) may affect the qubit relaxation rate. Naively, we might expect that the qubit relaxation rate should scale approximately as \(\bar{n}+1\) with increasing drive, because the effective interaction between the qubit and resonator scales as \(\sqrt{N_{e}}\), where \(N_{e}\) is the number of excitations in the system. However, this is not correct: the Purcell rate does not increase with \(\bar{n}\). It is easy to understand this fact using a picture of an almost linear interaction between the qubit and resonator, so that the photons at the resonator frequency do not affect the evolution of the qubit excitation, which is at the qubit frequency. Our calculations confirm that the Purcell rate does not increase with \(\bar{n}\) even in the strongly nonlinear regime (when \(\bar n \agt n_{\rm crit}\), where \(n_{\rm crit}\) is the so-called critical photon number --see later). In fact, somewhat surprisingly, we find the opposite effect: the qubit decay rate *decreases* with increasing \(\bar{n}\). This follows from an analytic formula, obtained in a simple intuitive approach. In the slightly nonlinear regime (when \(\bar n \ll n_{\rm crit}\)) this formula is confirmed using a formal approach based on a dispersive expansion of the interaction Hamiltonian; the formula is also confirmed by a numerical simulation in a wider range of nonlinearity. The suppression of the relaxation rate becomes significant (it may exceed an order of magnitude) when increasing \(\bar{n}\) brings the interaction into the strongly nonlinear regime (\(n\agt n_{\rm crit}\)). We have also found that besides the energy relaxation, in the presence of the microwave drive, the qubit may experience excitation as a result of photon loss to the resonator environment. In the moderately nonlinear regime the excitation rate grows with \(\bar{n}\), but remains much smaller than the relaxation rate. The simple analytics and formal analysis for the relaxation as well as the excitation rate agree well with the numerical results. The paper is organized in the following way. In Sec. II we start with reviewing the standard Purcell effect in the absence of a microwave drive. Then, in Sec. III, we calculate the Purcell rate in the presence of the drive analytically in two ways: using a simple approach and using a formal master equation approach. The analytical results are compared with the numerical results in Sec. IV. Finally, Sec. V is the conclusion. # Purcell effect without drive We begin with a discussion of the Purcell rate calculation by considering a qubit coupled to a resonator in the absence of a microwave drive. In this case, there are only three (bare) states involved in the evolution: \(|{\bf e}\rangle = |e\rangle|0\rangle = |e,0\rangle\), \(|{\bf 1}\rangle = |g\rangle|1 \rangle = |g,1\rangle\), and \(|{\bf g}\rangle = |g\rangle|0\rangle = |g,0\rangle\), where \(|e\rangle\) and \(|g\rangle\) denote the qubit states, while \(|0\rangle\) or \(|1\rangle\) represents the resonator state with 0 or 1 photon. We assume that the system is initially in the state \(|{\bf e}\rangle\) or a superposition of \(|{\bf e}\rangle\) and \(|{\bf 1}\rangle\). Then the qubit-resonator coupling causes coherent oscillations between the states \(|{\bf e}\rangle\) and \(|{\bf 1}\rangle\); however, leakage of the photon to the resonator environment eventually causes irreversible relaxation to the system ground state \(|{\bf g}\rangle\) (note that in some cases the Purcell relaxation can be considered as a coherent process ). The qubit-resonator system is described by the usual Jaynes-Cummings (JC) Hamiltonian (\(\hbar=1\)) \[\begin{aligned} \label{Ham-JC} H=\omega_{\rm r}a^{\dag}a+\frac{1}{2}\omega_{\rm q}\sigma_{z} +\textit{g} \, (a^{\dag}\sigma_{-}+ a\sigma_{+}), \end{aligned}\] where \(\omega_{\rm r}\) and \(\omega_{\rm q}\) are the resonator and the qubit frequencies, respectively, and \(\textit{g}\) is the qubit-resonator coupling, assumed to be real for simplicity of notations. Here \(\sigma_{\pm}\) are the qubit raising and lowering operators, \(\sigma_z=|e\rangle\langle e|-|g\rangle \langle g|=\sigma_+\sigma_--\sigma_-\sigma_+\), and \(a\) (\(a^{\dag}\)) is the annihilation (creation) operator for the resonator field. Let us use the rotating frame, which rotates with frequency \(\omega_{\rm r}\) for both the resonator and qubit. Formally, this is introduced by using the interaction picture, based on separating the Hamiltonian into two parts, \(H=H_{0}+V\), with \[\begin{aligned} && H_{0} = \omega_{\rm r}a^{\dag}a+ \frac{1}{2}\omega_{\rm r}\sigma_{z}, \label{H0}\\ && V= \frac{\Delta}{2}\sigma_{z}+ \textit{g} \, (a^{\dag}\sigma_{-}+ a\sigma_{+}), \end{aligned}\] where \(\Delta=\omega_{\rm q}-\omega_{\rm r}\), \(H_{0}\) is the free Hamiltonian, and \(V\) is the remaining interaction part. Note however that in the interaction picture the Hamiltonian does not depend on time, \(V_I =\exp(iH_{0}t)V\exp(-iH_{0}t)=V\), because \(V\) commutes with \(H_0\). Even though the resonator and qubit operators now formally depend on time, \(a(t)=a(0)\exp(-i\omega_{\rm r }t)\), \(a^\dagger(t)=a(0)\exp(i\omega_{\rm r }t)\), and \(\sigma_{\pm}(t)=\sigma_{\pm}(0)\exp(\pm i\omega_{\rm r }t/2)\), they always come in pairs, so that the time dependence is canceled out. This is why we can still use the time-independent operators \(a\), \(a^\dagger\), and \(\sigma_{\pm}\), which simplifies calculations. This trick is possible because the JC Hamiltonian ([\[Ham-JC\]](#Ham-JC){reference-type="ref" reference="Ham-JC"}) is only the rotating-wave approximation of the actual physical Hamiltonian. The evolution of the qubit-resonator system that accounts for the photon loss from the resonator can be described by a master equation in Lindblad form \[\begin{aligned} \label{H} && \dot \rho=-i[V,\rho]+\kappa\mathcal{D}[a]\rho, \\ \label{LB} && \kappa\mathcal{D}[a]\rho=\kappa(a\rho a^{\dag}-a^{\dag}a\rho/2-\rho a^{\dag} a/2), \end{aligned}\] where \(\kappa\) is the resonator decay rate. Note that as discussed above, all operators here (except the density matrix \(\rho\)) do not depend on time, even though we are using the interaction picture. Also note that in this master equation we assumed that coupling between the resonator and the bath (transmission line) is frequency-independent; this assumption is no longer valid in the case of the Purcell filter, when \(\kappa\) becomes frequency-dependent. Since we are only interested in quantifying the qubit relaxation through the resonator, we do not take into account the intrinsic qubit relaxation and pure dephasing. Using Eq. [\[H\]](#H){reference-type="eqref" reference="H"}, one easily obtains the equations for the density matrix elements in the single-excitation subspace (in the bare-state basis of \(|{\bf e}\rangle\) and \(|{\bf 1}\rangle\)), which are decoupled from the elements containing state \(|{\bf g}\rangle\), \[\label{M} \left( \begin{array}{c} \dot\rho_{\bf e e} \\ \dot\rho_{\bf 1 1} \\ \dot \rho_{\bf e 1}^{-}\\ \dot\rho_{\bf e 1}^{+}\\ \end{array} \right)= \left( \begin{array}{cccc} 0 & 0 & i\textit{g}&0 \\ 0 &-\kappa &-i\textit{g}&0 \\ 2i\textit{g}&-2i\textit{g}&-\frac{\kappa}{2}&-i\Delta \\ 0& 0&-i\Delta&-\frac{\kappa}{2}\\ \end{array} \right)\left( \begin{array}{c} \rho_{\bf e e} \\ \rho_{\bf 1 1} \\ \rho_{\bf e 1}^{-}\\ \rho_{\bf e 1}^{+}\\ \end{array} \right),\] where \(\rho_{\bf e 1}^{\pm}=\rho_{\bf e 1}\pm\rho_{\bf 1 e}\). Here the bare-state populations \(\rho_{\bf e e}\) and \(\rho_{\bf 1 1}\) are coupled to the coherences \(\rho_{\bf e 1}^{\pm}\) via terms proportional to \(g\), while the damping term proportional to \(\kappa\) contributes to the decay of \(\rho_{\bf 1 1}\), but does not affect \(\rho_{\bf e e}\). Note that the coherences \(\rho_{\bf e1}^{\pm}\) decay with the rate \(\kappa/2\). The population of the state \(|{\bf g}\rangle\) obviously increases as \(\dot\rho_{\bf gg}=\kappa \rho_{\bf 11}\). Equation ([\[M\]](#M){reference-type="ref" reference="M"}) can be used in numerical as well as in analytical calculations. In particular, the eigenvalues of the evolution can be found analytically from the corresponding quartic equation, which in this case has a relatively simple solution. Below we will obtain these eigenvalues in a different way. Instead of using the density matrix language for the description of the Purcell effect, it is also possible to use the simpler language of wavefunctions, even in the presence of the decay \(\kappa\). Physically, this is because in the single-excitation subspace unraveling of the Lindblad equation (see, e.g., ) corresponds to only one scenario with no relaxation, and therefore the wavefunction evolution is non-stochastic. More formally, we can rewrite the master equation [\[H\]](#H){reference-type="eqref" reference="H"} as \(\dot \rho=-i[H_{\rm eff},\rho]+\kappa a\rho a^{\dag}\), where \(H_{\rm eff}=V-i\kappa a^{\dag}a/2\) is an effective non-Hermitian Hamiltonian. The term \(\kappa a\rho a^{\dag}\) can be neglected because in the single-excitation subspace it produces a contribution only from higher-excitation subspaces, which are not populated. Therefore, in the single-excitation subspace we have \(\dot \rho=-i[H_{\rm eff},\rho]\) or equivalently \(|\dot \psi \rangle=-iH_{\rm eff}|\psi\rangle\), which describes the evolution of the *decaying* wavefunction \(|\psi (t)\rangle =\alpha(t) |{\bf e}\rangle + \beta(t) |{\bf 1}\rangle\): \[\begin{aligned} && \dot{\alpha} =-i \frac{\Delta}{2}\alpha-i\textit{g} \beta, \\ && \dot{\beta} = i \frac{\Delta}{2}\beta-i\textit{g} \alpha-\frac{\kappa}{2}\beta. \end{aligned}\] (Another way to derive these equations is by considering only the no-relaxation scenario when unraveling the evolution.) These are the usual equations for a two-level system, but with complex energy \(-\Delta/2-i\kappa/2\) of the bare state \(|{\bf 1}\rangle\). Using the standard diagonalization procedure, we can find two eigenstates with energies \(\tilde{E}=-i\kappa/4 \pm \sqrt{-\kappa^2/16+\textit{g}^2 +\Delta^2/4 +i\kappa\Delta/4}\), which can be written as \[\tilde{E}_{ e} =\frac{\Omega}{2}- i\frac{\Gamma}{2}, \quad \tilde{E}_{ 1} =-\frac{\Omega}{2}- i\frac{\kappa-\Gamma}{2}, \label{tilde-E}\] with \[\begin{aligned} && \Gamma = \frac{\kappa}{2}-\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}\sqrt{-A+\sqrt{A^2+(\kappa\Delta)^2}}, \label{Gamma-exact}\\ && \Omega = \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}\sqrt{A+\sqrt{A^2+(\kappa\Delta)^2}}\, {\rm sgn}(\Delta), \label{Omega-exact}\\ && A=\Delta^2 +4\textit{g}^2-\kappa^2/4. \end{aligned}\] Here \(\tilde E_{ e}\) is the complex energy of the eigenstate (*"dressed" state, which includes decay*), corresponding to the excited qubit, while \(\tilde E_{ 1}\) corresponds to the dressed resonator photon (notice the sign of \(\Delta\) in the formula for \(\Omega\)). Since \({\rm Im}(\tilde E_{ e})=-\Gamma/2\), the population of the qubit dressed state decays with the rate \(\Gamma\). Therefore \(\Gamma\) is the qubit relaxation rate, i.e., the Purcell rate, while the photon relaxation rate is \(\kappa-\Gamma\). If the initial state is not one of these eigenstates, then the evolution also includes oscillations with beating frequency \(\Omega\), decaying with the rate \(-{\rm Im}(\tilde{E}_{ e}+\tilde{E}_{ 1})=\kappa/2\). We have checked that the same rates can be obtained by diagonalizing the evolution matrix in Eq. [\[M\]](#M){reference-type="eqref" reference="M"}, which has four eigenvalues: \(-\Gamma\), \(-(\kappa-\Gamma)\), and \(-\kappa/2\pm i\Omega\), as expected from Eq. ([\[tilde-E\]](#tilde-E){reference-type="ref" reference="tilde-E"}). Note that for small \(\kappa\) the frequency \(|\Omega |\) is close to the usual Rabi frequency \(\sqrt{\Delta^2+4\textit{g}^2}\), but large \(\kappa\) may change it significantly. The eigenstates (dressed states with decay) \(|{\bf \tilde{e}}\rangle = \tilde\alpha_{ e}|{ \bf e}\rangle +\tilde\beta_{ e}|\bf{1}\rangle\) and \(|{\bf \tilde{1}}\rangle = \tilde\alpha_{ 1}|{ \bf e}\rangle +\tilde\beta_{ 1}|\bf{1}\rangle\) corresponding to the energies \(\tilde E_{ e}\) and \(\tilde E_{ 1}\) can be found in the standard way, via the ratio \(\tilde\beta_{{ e},{ 1}}/\tilde\alpha_{{ e},{ 1}}=(\tilde{E}_{{ e},{ 1}}-\Delta/2)/\textit{g}\) and the normalization condition. However, note that these eigenstates are not mutually orthogonal, so finding the expansion of an initial state in the eigenbasis, \(|\psi_{\rm in}\rangle =\tilde{c}_{ e} |{\bf \tilde{e}}\rangle +\tilde{c}_{ 1} |{\bf \tilde{1}}\rangle\), is somewhat more involved: \(\tilde{c}_1=\langle {\bf \tilde{e}}_\perp|\psi_{\rm in}\rangle/ \langle {\bf \tilde{e}}_\perp|{\bf \tilde{1}}\rangle\), where \(|{\bf \tilde{e}}_\perp\rangle\) is the vector orthogonal to \(|{\bf \tilde{e}}\rangle\) (similarly for \(\tilde{c}_e\)). The evolution in the single-excitation subspace is then \(|\psi (t)\rangle = \tilde{c}_{ e} e^{-i\Omega t/2}e^{-\Gamma t/2} |{\bf \tilde{e}}\rangle +\tilde{c}_{ 1} e^{i\Omega t/2}e^{-(\kappa-\Gamma) t/2} |{\bf \tilde{1}}\rangle\), and it is easy to find the density matrix elements; for example the bare-state qubit occupation is \(\rho_{\bf ee} (t) = |\tilde c_e \tilde \alpha_{ e} e^{-i\Omega t/2}e^{-\Gamma t/2} +\tilde c_1 \tilde\alpha_{ 1} e^{i\Omega t/2}e^{-(\kappa-\Gamma) t/2} |^2\). Now let us consider several special cases starting with the case usually discussed for optical systems (e.g., ), in which the resonator damping rate is much larger than the coupling: \(\kappa\gg |\textit{g}|\), while \(\Delta\) is arbitrary. Expanding Eqs. ([\[Gamma-exact\]](#Gamma-exact){reference-type="ref" reference="Gamma-exact"}) and ([\[Omega-exact\]](#Omega-exact){reference-type="ref" reference="Omega-exact"}) in \(\textit{g}/\kappa\) and keeping the first two leading terms produces \[\begin{aligned} \label{prc} && \Gamma = \frac{\kappa \textit{g}^2}{\Delta^2+(\kappa/2)^2}, \\ && \Omega = \Delta\left(1+\frac{2\textit{g}^2}{\Delta^2+(\kappa/2)^2}\right). \qquad \end{aligned}\] This formula for the Purcell rate \(\Gamma\) can be interpreted as Fermi's golden rule for the transition from the state \(|{\bf e}\rangle\) to the relaxation-widened state \(|{\bf 1}\rangle\) with width \(\kappa\). Note that at resonance, \(\Delta=0\), the Purcell rate ([\[prc\]](#prc){reference-type="ref" reference="prc"}) reduces to \(\Gamma = 4g^2/\kappa\), while in the case \(|\Delta |\gg \kappa\) it becomes \(\Gamma = \kappa g^2/\Delta^2\); also note that \(\Gamma \ll \kappa\) because of the assumption \(|\textit{g}|\ll \kappa\). If the evolution starts with the bare state \(|{\bf e}\rangle\), then the probability to find the qubit in the excited state decays as \[\begin{aligned} \label{raa} \rho_{\bf e e}(t)& \approx e^{-\Gamma t}\left[1+\frac{8\textit{g}^2(\kappa^2-4\Delta^2)}{(\kappa^2+4\Delta^2)^2}\right]-\frac{8\textit{g}^2 e^{-\kappa t/2}}{(\kappa^2+4\Delta^2)^2}\notag\\ &\times \left[4\kappa|\Delta| \sin (|\Omega| t)+(\kappa^2-4\Delta^2)\cos (\Omega t)\right]. \end{aligned}\] In this formula the oscillation amplitude is always small because of the assumption \(|\textit{g}| \ll \kappa\) (the amplitude of the neglected term \(e^{-(\kappa-\Gamma)t}\) is even smaller), so that in the leading order \(\rho_{\bf e e}(t) \approx e^{-\Gamma t}\). We have obtained Eq. ([\[raa\]](#raa){reference-type="ref" reference="raa"}) from the density matrix evolution ([\[M\]](#M){reference-type="ref" reference="M"}) by using the method of Laplace transform, in which \(\rho (t) \rightarrow \rho (s)\) and \(\dot \rho(t)\rightarrow s\rho (s)-\rho (t=0)\). The solution is then obtained by taking the inverse Laplace transform of \(\rho (s)\). In circuit QED experiments the typical regime is different from what is usually considered in optics. Most importantly, instead of the above assumption \(\kappa \gg |\textit{g}|\), in the circuit QED systems the relation is usually the opposite: \(\kappa \alt |\textit{g}|\) or even \(\kappa \ll |\textit{g}|\). Therefore, the result ([\[prc\]](#prc){reference-type="ref" reference="prc"}) for the Purcell rate is inapplicable in the way we derived it, but we can still use the exact formula ([\[Gamma-exact\]](#Gamma-exact){reference-type="ref" reference="Gamma-exact"}). \[Note that Eq. ([\[prc\]](#prc){reference-type="ref" reference="prc"}) can actually be derived from Eq. ([\[Gamma-exact\]](#Gamma-exact){reference-type="ref" reference="Gamma-exact"}) using a weaker assumption: \(|\textit{g}|\ll \max (\kappa, |\Delta|)\).\] The formula for the Purcell rate that is most widely used in the circuit QED is the strong-dispersive-regime formula \[\label{gcd} \Gamma_{d}=\frac{\kappa \textit{g}^2}{\Delta^2},\] which can be derived from Eq. ([\[Gamma-exact\]](#Gamma-exact){reference-type="ref" reference="Gamma-exact"}) by assuming \(|\Delta|\gg \max (|\textit{g}|,\kappa)\), keeping the relation between \(|\textit{g}|\) and \(\kappa\) arbitrary. This formula has a simple interpretation: the fraction \((\textit{g}/\Delta)^2\) of the dressed qubit state (i.e. the eigenstate) is in the form of the resonator photon, and this part decays with the rate \(\kappa\). Now let us derive the expression for the Purcell rate using the weaker assumption \(\kappa \ll \sqrt{\Delta^2 +4\textit{g}^2}\), which is usually well-satisfied in the circuit QED experiments. The detuning \(|\Delta|\) may be much larger or comparable to the coupling \(|\textit{g}|\). In this case it is physically natural to use the basis of the single-excitation eigenstates (dressed states without decay) \(\overline{|e,0\rangle}\) and \(\overline{|g,1\rangle}\) besides the basis of the bare states \(|{\bf e}\rangle =|e,0\rangle\) and \(|{\bf 1}\rangle =|g,1\rangle\). (Note the difference from the eigenbasis \(\{ |{\bf \tilde{e}}\rangle, |{\bf \tilde{1}}\rangle\}\), which includes decay.) If the initial state is \(\overline{|e,0\rangle}\), then the system would remain in this state if \(\kappa=0\). However, non-zero (but still small) \(\kappa\) causes the rare jumps \(|g,1\rangle \rightarrow |g,0\rangle\). Therefore, the rate of jumps should be proportional to the occupation of the bare state \(|g,1\rangle\) and the Purcell rate can be approximated as \[\label{ga} \Gamma_{P}=\kappa |\langle g,1|\overline{e,0\rangle}|^2= \frac{\kappa}{2}\left(1-\frac{\Delta}{\sqrt{\Delta^2+4g^2}}\right),\] where we used the exact formula for the overlap between the states \(\overline{|e,0\rangle}\) and \(|g,1\rangle\). Numerical comparison between this formula and exact result ([\[Gamma-exact\]](#Gamma-exact){reference-type="ref" reference="Gamma-exact"}) shows that it is a very good approximation for small \(\kappa\); in particular, the relative error is less than \(0.25\kappa^2/(\Delta^2+4g^2)\) for \(\kappa/g<4\). We will be using Eq. [\[ga\]](#ga){reference-type="eqref" reference="ga"} in the following sections. It is easy to see that in the regime \(|\Delta| \gg |\textit{g}|\) the rate \(\Gamma_P\) reduces to \(\Gamma_{d}\) in Eq. [\[gcd\]](#gcd){reference-type="eqref" reference="gcd"}. If the evolution starts with the bare state \(|e,0\rangle\), then in the dispersive regime, \(|\Delta|\gg |\textit{g}|\agt \kappa\), its population evolves as \[\begin{aligned} \label{rab} \rho_{\bf e e}(t) \approx e^{-\Gamma_{P} t} \left(1-\frac{2\textit{g}^2}{\Delta^2}\right)+ \frac{2\textit{g}^2}{\Delta^2} \cos (\Omega t) \, e^{-\kappa t/2}, \end{aligned}\] where \(|\Omega| \approx \sqrt{\Delta^2 + 4\textit{g}^2}\). The oscillation amplitude is small, but still noticeable for moderate values of \(\Delta/\textit{g}\). In contrast, if the evolution starts with the eigenstate \(\overline{|e,0\rangle}\), then the population of this eigenstate decays almost without oscillation, \[\overline{\rho}_{\bf ee} \approx e^{-\Gamma_P t} \left(1+\frac{\textit{g}^2\kappa^2}{2\Delta^4}\right) -\frac{\textit{g}^2\kappa^2}{2\Delta^4}\cos(\Omega t)e^{-\kappa t/2} \approx e^{-\Gamma_P t}. \label{rho-eigen-disp}\] The small remaining oscillation amplitude \(\textit{g}^2\kappa^2/2\Delta^4\) is due to the difference between \(\overline{|e,0\rangle}\) and \(|{\bf \tilde{e}}\rangle\), while the amplitude \(2\textit{g}^2/\Delta^2\) in Eq. ([\[rab\]](#rab){reference-type="ref" reference="rab"}) is due to the much larger difference between \(|e,0\rangle\) and \(\overline{|e,0\rangle}\) (the factor of 2 comes from two conversions: from the bare basis to the eigenbasis and then back). # Purcell effect with microwave drive So far we have only considered one excitation in the system. This situation is relevant to the qubit decay during coherent operations in circuit QED systems. However, the qubit measurement requires adding a microwave drive in resonance (or close to resonance) with the resonator frequency--see Fig. [\[fig-model\]](#fig-model){reference-type="ref" reference="fig-model"}. This is the main motivation here to analyze qubit relaxation through the resonator in the presence of additional excitations in the system. To this end, we consider a dispersive qubit-resonator interaction (but not necessarily strongly dispersive, say \(|\Delta/\textit{g}|\geq 5\)) with an external microwave drive. The Hamiltonian for the qubit-resonator system with a coherent microwave drive is given by \[\begin{aligned} \label{Ham}\ H&=\omega_{\rm r}a^{\dag}a+\frac{1}{2}\omega_{\rm q}\sigma_{z}+\textit{g}\, (a^{\dag}\sigma_{-}+ a\sigma_{+})\notag\\ &+\varepsilon(a e^{i\omega_{\rm d}t}+a^{\dag} e^{-i\omega_{\rm d}t}), \end{aligned}\] where \(\omega_{\rm d}\) is the drive frequency and \(\varepsilon\), assumed to be real and constant, is the normalized amplitude of the microwave drive. Following the same line of reasoning as was used to derive Eq. [\[H\]](#H){reference-type="eqref" reference="H"}, we introduce the frame rotating at \(\omega_{\rm r}\) via the free Hamiltonian ([\[H0\]](#H0){reference-type="ref" reference="H0"}), so that the interaction part of the Hamiltonian in this frame has the form \[\begin{aligned} && H_{I}=\frac{\Delta}{2}\sigma_{z}+\textit{g}\, (a^{\dag}\sigma_{-}+ a\sigma_{+}) \nonumber \\ && \hspace{0.8cm} +\varepsilon \left( e^{i(\omega_{\rm d}-\omega_{\rm r})t}a +e^{-i(\omega_{\rm d}-\omega_{\rm r})t}a^{\dag}\right), \label{ham}\end{aligned}\] where all operators are time-independent. For simplicity we assume the drive to be exactly on resonance with the resonator frequency, \(\omega_{\rm d}=\omega_{\rm r}\), though this assumption is not critical for our analysis. The master equation, including the loss of photons through the resonator \[see Eq. ([\[LB\]](#LB){reference-type="ref" reference="LB"})\], is given by \[\label{mast} \dot \rho=-i[H_{I},\rho]+\kappa\mathcal{D}[a]\rho.\] We focus on the experimentally important regime of sufficiently small resonator damping rate, \(\kappa \ll |\Delta|\). More precisely, we assume \(\kappa \ll \sqrt{\Delta^2 +4g^2(\bar{n}+1)}\), where \(\bar{n}\) is the average number of photons in the resonator, induced by the drive. In this case the Jaynes-Cummings ladder of levels (Fig. [\[fig-JC\]](#fig-JC){reference-type="ref" reference="fig-JC"}) is affected by an interaction (between \(|e,n\rangle\) and \(|g,n+1\rangle\)) with the strength \(\sqrt{N_e} \, g\), but the effect of \(\kappa\) is relatively small. Here \(N_e\) is the total number of excitations, \(N_e=n\) for the bare state \(|g,n\rangle\) and \(N_e=n+1\) for the state \(|e,n\rangle\). Therefore, it is natural to introduce the basis of the pairwise eigenstates represented by red dashed lines in Fig. [\[fig-JC\]](#fig-JC){reference-type="ref" reference="fig-JC"} and denoted by the overline: \[\begin{aligned} && \overline{|e,n\rangle}=\cos\theta_{n+1}|e,n\rangle-\sin\theta_{n+1} |g,n+1\rangle, \label{en-bar}\\ && \overline{|g,n\rangle}=\cos\theta_n|g,n\rangle+ \sin\theta_n|e,n-1\rangle \label{gn-bar}, \\ && \hspace{0.0cm} \tan (2\theta_{n})=2g\sqrt{n}/\Delta. \label{tan-2theta} \end{aligned}\] The level splitting between the eigenstates is \[\begin{aligned} \overline{E}_{e,n-1}-\overline{E}_{g,n} =& \sqrt{\Delta^2+4n\textit{g}^2} \,\, {\rm sgn} (\Delta) \nonumber \\ = & \Delta \sqrt{1+4N_e\textit{g}^2/\Delta^2}, \label{E-eigen}\end{aligned}\] and in the rotating frame, which we use, both energies are symmetric about zero, \(\overline{E}_{g,n}=-\overline{E}_{e,n-1}\). Note that the level splitting changes significantly when the number of photons \(n\) becomes comparable with the so-called critical photon number, \[n_{\rm crit}= \frac{\Delta^2}{4g^2}. \label{n-crit}\] The use of eigenstates as logical states in quantum computing applications is more natural than the use of the bare states, and in most practical cases the dynamics is sufficiently adiabatic to be naturally represented in the eigenbasis. Therefore, when we will consider the qubit being initially in the excited state, we will actually assume that the initial state is the (coherent-state) superposition of *eigenstates* ([\[en-bar\]](#en-bar){reference-type="ref" reference="en-bar"}) corresponding to the excited state of the qubit (right set of red dashed lines in Fig. [\[fig-JC\]](#fig-JC){reference-type="ref" reference="fig-JC"}). Accordingly, the relaxation process corresponds to increasing occupation of the \(|g\rangle\)-eigenstates ([\[gn-bar\]](#gn-bar){reference-type="ref" reference="gn-bar"}) (left set of red dashed lines in Fig. [\[fig-JC\]](#fig-JC){reference-type="ref" reference="fig-JC"}). The use of eigenstates allows us to avoid oscillations in the evolution, caused by the difference between the bases \[see, e.g., Eqs. ([\[rab\]](#rab){reference-type="ref" reference="rab"}) and ([\[rho-eigen-disp\]](#rho-eigen-disp){reference-type="ref" reference="rho-eigen-disp"}) for the single-excitation case\]. In the following, we present two ways to derive an approximate analytical formula for the Purcell rate in the presence of a microwave drive. We first use a simple intuitive approach applicable for an arbitrary nonlinearity (arbitrary ratio \(\bar n/n_{\rm crit}\)) and then use a formal perturbative approach applicable in the slightly nonlinear regime (\(\bar n \ll n_{\rm crit}\)). The results of the two approaches are shown to coincide in the validity range of the formal approach. ## Purcell rate with drive: Simple approach The damping of the resonator state is described by the Lindblad form [\[LB\]](#LB){reference-type="eqref" reference="LB"}. We can think of this process by unraveling it into "jump" and "no jump" scenarios (see, e.g., ), so that the first term in Eq. ([\[LB\]](#LB){reference-type="ref" reference="LB"}) describes random jumps due to the action of the operator \(a\), which occur with the rate \(\kappa {\rm Tr}(a^\dagger a \rho)=\kappa\bar{n}\), while the remaining two terms describe the state evolution due to absence of jumps. Without the qubit the driven resonator would reach a steady coherent state, for which the jump produces no change (because the coherent state is an eigenstate of the operator \(a\)), while the photon-number decay due to the no-jump evolution is compensated by the drive. In the presence of the qubit there are two sets of eigenstates (Fig. [\[fig-JC\]](#fig-JC){reference-type="ref" reference="fig-JC"}, we will refer to them as two ladders) and within each ladder the process is approximately the same as without the qubit (up to a factor, accounting for the overall population of each ladder). However, the jumps *between* the ladders lead to Purcell-effect relaxation (or excitation). ### Qubit relaxation rate {#qubit-relaxation-rate .unnumbered} If the system is in the eigenstate \(\overline{|e,n\rangle}\) (see Fig. [\[fig-JC\]](#fig-JC){reference-type="ref" reference="fig-JC"}), then the (random) action of the operator \(a\) gives the unnormalized state \(a \overline{|e,n\rangle}\). This state is a superposition of bare states \(|e,n-1\rangle\) and \(|g,n\rangle\). Expanding the state \(a \overline{|e,n\rangle}\) in the eigenbasis, we see that most of it contributes to \(\overline{|e, n-1\rangle}\), which belongs to the set of excited eigenstates. However, there is a non-zero overlap between \(a \overline{|e,n\rangle}\) and \(\overline{|g,n\rangle}\), which leads to the qubit energy relaxation (transition from the right to left ladder of eigenstates in Fig. [\[fig-JC\]](#fig-JC){reference-type="ref" reference="fig-JC"}). The rate of this relaxation process (Purcell rate from the state \(\overline{|e,n\rangle}\)) is therefore \[\Gamma_{R}(n)=\kappa|\overline{\langle g,n|}a\overline{|e,n\rangle}|^2, \label{Gamma-R-n}\] where the subscript \(R\) means relaxation. Note that \(\Gamma_R(0)=\Gamma_P\) \[see Eq. ([\[ga\]](#ga){reference-type="ref" reference="ga"})\]. Using explicit expressions ([\[en-bar\]](#en-bar){reference-type="ref" reference="en-bar"}) and ([\[gn-bar\]](#gn-bar){reference-type="ref" reference="gn-bar"}) for the eigenstates, we find \[\Gamma_{R}(n)= \kappa (\sqrt{n+1}\sin\theta_{n+1}\cos\theta_n-\sqrt{n}\sin\theta_n\cos\theta_{n+1})^2, \label{Gamma-R-n-2}\] where \(\theta_n\) is given by Eq. ([\[tan-2theta\]](#tan-2theta){reference-type="ref" reference="tan-2theta"}). It is important that there is a significant energy shift (\(\simeq \sqrt{\Delta^2 +4 \textit{g}^2 \bar{n}}\)) between the two ladders of eigenstates, so that the contribution to \(\overline{|g,n\rangle}\) due to the next jump from \(\overline{|e,n\rangle}\) is incoherent with the previous jump contribution (it brings a different random phase), which allows us to characterize the relaxation process by a rate \(\Gamma_R\). However, when different eigenstates \(\overline{|e,n\rangle}\) are populated, then the jumps from these states occur in a mutually coherent way (the operator \(a\) acts on the superposition), resulting in a mutual coherence within the set of eigenstates in the left ladder in Fig. [\[fig-JC\]](#fig-JC){reference-type="ref" reference="fig-JC"}. Nevertheless, this does not affect the jumps between the left and right ladders of states, and therefore the rate \(\Gamma_R(n)\) can be simply averaged over the population \(P(n)\) of the states \(\overline{|e,n\rangle}\), \[\Gamma_{R} =\left [ \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} P(n) \, \Gamma_{R}(n) \right] / \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} P(n). \label{Gamma-R}\] A natural assumption is that \(P(n)\) is close to the coherent-state distribution (the normalization is not important), \[P(n)= e^{-\bar{n}} \bar{n}^n /n! \,. \label{coh-distr}\] Actually, this coherent-state assumption becomes invalid at sufficiently large \(\bar n\), when non-linearities (like squeezing) become significant; however, this is not important because at \(\bar n \gg 1\) the averaging ([\[Gamma-R\]](#Gamma-R){reference-type="ref" reference="Gamma-R"}) is not really needed as long as the spread of occupied values of \(n\) is much smaller than \(\bar n\). For \(\bar n\), it is natural to use the value in the absence of qubit, \(\bar n\approx 4|\varepsilon|^2/\kappa^2\), or a more accurate value, which accounts for the shift of the resonator frequency by the qubit--see Eq. ([\[mn\]](#mn){reference-type="ref" reference="mn"}) later. Note that here \(\bar{n}\) is the average number of photons in the ladder of "excited" eigenstates (it would be better to use a different notation, \(\bar n_e\), for this meaning--see the next subsection, but we will use \(\bar n\) here for brevity). The blue solid lines in Fig. [\[fig-Gamma\]](#fig-Gamma){reference-type="ref" reference="fig-Gamma"} show the \(\bar n\)-dependence of the Purcell rate \(\Gamma_{R}\) (normalized by the no-drive value \(\Gamma_{P}\)) for several values of the normalized detuning \(\Delta/\textit{g}\). As we see, the Purcell rate decreases with increasing \(\bar n\), and the suppression (compared with the no-drive case) can be strong at large \(\bar n\). The dashed red lines show \(\Gamma_{R} (\bar n)\) calculated using Eq. ([\[Gamma-R-n-2\]](#Gamma-R-n-2){reference-type="ref" reference="Gamma-R-n-2"}), in which a non-integer \(\bar n\) is introduced in the natural way via a non-integer \(\bar n\) in Eq. ([\[tan-2theta\]](#tan-2theta){reference-type="ref" reference="tan-2theta"}). As expected, the dashed and solid lines almost coincide at \(\bar n \gg 10\), while there is a noticeable difference between them for \(\bar n \alt 10\) when \(\Delta /\textit{g}\) is not very large. In the experimentally interesting regime when \(\Delta \gg g\), the rate \(\Gamma_{R}\) can be expanded in powers of \[\lambda = g/\Delta.\] (We will need this expansion for comparison with the results of the formal approach in the next subsection.) Expanding Eq. ([\[Gamma-R-n-2\]](#Gamma-R-n-2){reference-type="ref" reference="Gamma-R-n-2"}) in powers of \(\lambda\), we obtain \(\Gamma_{R}(n)=\kappa \lambda^2 [ 1-3\lambda^2(2 n+1) +\lambda^4(31 n^2+31 n+10) -\lambda^6(150 n^3+225 n^2+145 n+35)+...]\). The averaging ([\[Gamma-R\]](#Gamma-R){reference-type="ref" reference="Gamma-R"}) then gives \(\overline{n^2}=\bar n^2+\bar n\), \(\overline{n^3}=\bar n^3+3\bar n^2+\bar n\), etc., thus resulting in a series \[\begin{aligned} \label{Gamma-R-exp} \Gamma_{R}&=\kappa \lambda^2\big[1-3\lambda^2(2\bar n+1) +\lambda^4(31\bar n^2+62\bar n+10)\notag\\ &-\lambda^6(150\bar n^3+675\bar n^2+520\bar n+35)+...\big]. \end{aligned}\] This truncated series is shown by the green dot-dashed line in Fig. [\[fig-Gamma\]](#fig-Gamma){reference-type="ref" reference="fig-Gamma"}. The first term in the expansion ([\[Gamma-R-exp\]](#Gamma-R-exp){reference-type="ref" reference="Gamma-R-exp"}) gives the standard Purcell rate \(\Gamma_{d}=\kappa \textit{g}^2/\Delta^2\) in the strong dispersive regime (\(\lambda\ll 1\))--see Eq. ([\[gcd\]](#gcd){reference-type="ref" reference="gcd"}). The negative sign of the second term means that the Purcell rate decreases with increasing number of photons in the resonator. In the leading order of the correction (assuming \(1\ll \bar{n} \ll n_{\rm crit}\)) Eq. ([\[Gamma-R-exp\]](#Gamma-R-exp){reference-type="ref" reference="Gamma-R-exp"}) becomes \[\Gamma_R \approx \Gamma_d \left( 1-\frac{3}{2}\, \frac{\bar{n}}{n_{\rm crit}}\right), \label{Gamma-R-approx}\] where \(n_{\rm crit}\) is given by Eq. ([\[n-crit\]](#n-crit){reference-type="ref" reference="n-crit"}). Note that Eq. ([\[Gamma-R-approx\]](#Gamma-R-approx){reference-type="ref" reference="Gamma-R-approx"}) gives a slightly inaccurate value for \(\bar n \alt 1\) since at \(\bar{n}=0\) the expansion ([\[Gamma-R-exp\]](#Gamma-R-exp){reference-type="ref" reference="Gamma-R-exp"}) gives \(\Gamma_R(0)=\Gamma_P\) \[see Eq. ([\[ga\]](#ga){reference-type="ref" reference="ga"})\]; however, the difference between \(\Gamma_d\) with \(\Gamma_P\) is small when \(|\textit{g}/\Delta|\ll 1\). When \(\bar{n}\gg 1\), we do not need the summation in Eq. ([\[Gamma-R\]](#Gamma-R){reference-type="ref" reference="Gamma-R"}) and can use approximation \(\Gamma_R \approx \Gamma_R (\bar{n})\) if the effective spread of \(n\) values is much smaller than \(\bar n\), i.e., \(\sqrt{\, \overline{n^2}-\bar n^2} \ll \bar n\) (therefore, moderate nonlinear effects still allow this simplification). In this case \(|\theta_{\bar n+1}-\theta_{\bar n}|\ll 1\) in Eq. ([\[Gamma-R-n-2\]](#Gamma-R-n-2){reference-type="ref" reference="Gamma-R-n-2"}), and using the first-order expansion of this equation we obtain the approximation \[\Gamma_R \approx \frac{\kappa \textit{g}^2}{4\Delta^2} \left(\frac{1}{1+\bar n/n_{\rm crit}} +\frac{1}{\sqrt{1+\bar n/n_{\rm crit}}}\right)^2, \label{Gamma-large-n}\] which is valid when \(\bar{n}\gg 1\) with arbitrary ratio \(\bar n/n_{\rm crit}\). (This is in contrast to the truncated perturbative expansion in powers of \(\lambda\), which works well only for \(\bar n/n_{\rm crit} \ll 1\).) From Eq. ([\[Gamma-large-n\]](#Gamma-large-n){reference-type="ref" reference="Gamma-large-n"}) we see that the Purcell rate \(\Gamma_R\) decreases significantly when \(\bar{n}\) becomes comparable to \(n_{\rm crit}\), and it continues to decrease with increasing \(\bar{n}\), eventually approaching zero. Figure [\[fig-Gamma-norm\]](#fig-Gamma-norm){reference-type="ref" reference="fig-Gamma-norm"} illustrates the dependence of the Purcell rate \(\Gamma_{R}\) (normalized by the no-drive value \(\Gamma_{P}\)) on the ratio \(\bar n/n_{\rm crit}\) for several values of the normalized detuning \(\Delta/\textit{g}\). We see that the different curves shown in Fig. [\[fig-Gamma\]](#fig-Gamma){reference-type="ref" reference="fig-Gamma"} now collapse onto practically the same line for \(|\Delta/\textit{g} | \agt 10\), with a significant deviation starting only when \(|\Delta/\textit{g}|\alt 5\). The approximation ([\[Gamma-large-n\]](#Gamma-large-n){reference-type="ref" reference="Gamma-large-n"}) is shown by the black dot-dashed line for large \(\Delta/\textit{g}\). This approximation also works well (not shown) for the upper curve, \(\Delta/\textit{g}=5\), except for the range \(\bar n \alt 3\) (correspondingly \(\bar n /n_{\rm crit} \alt 0.5\)), because of the difference between \(\Gamma_d\) and \(\Gamma_P\). From Eq. ([\[Gamma-large-n\]](#Gamma-large-n){reference-type="ref" reference="Gamma-large-n"}), the suppression at \(\bar n=n_{\rm crit}\) is \(\Gamma_R/\Gamma_P\approx (3+2\sqrt{2})/16= 0.36\) for large \(\Delta/\textit{g}\). In the strong suppression limit when \(\bar{n} \gg n_{\rm crit}\), the rate ([\[Gamma-R-n-2\]](#Gamma-R-n-2){reference-type="ref" reference="Gamma-R-n-2"}) \[or ([\[Gamma-large-n\]](#Gamma-large-n){reference-type="ref" reference="Gamma-large-n"})\] can be approximated as \[\Gamma_R \approx \Gamma_d \frac{n_{\rm crit}}{4\bar n} \left[1+2\sqrt{\frac{n_{\rm crit}}{\bar n}}\right]. \label{Gamma-R-lim}\] This approximation and the opposite-limit approximation ([\[Gamma-R-approx\]](#Gamma-R-approx){reference-type="ref" reference="Gamma-R-approx"}) are shown by red dashed lines in Fig. [\[fig-Gamma-norm\]](#fig-Gamma-norm){reference-type="ref" reference="fig-Gamma-norm"}. ### Qubit excitation rate {#qubit-excitation-rate .unnumbered} Similar to the calculation of the qubit energy relaxation rate ([\[Gamma-R-n\]](#Gamma-R-n){reference-type="ref" reference="Gamma-R-n"}), we can calculate the qubit excitation rate. Now the initial state is assumed to be \(\overline{|g,n\rangle}\), and the jump due to the action of the operator \(a\) yields the unnormalized state \(a\overline{|gn\rangle}\), which has a non-zero overlap with the eigenstate \(\overline{|e,n-2\rangle}\), corresponding to the excited state of the qubit. Therefore, the qubit excitation rate is \[\gamma_{E} (n)= \kappa|\overline{\langle e,n-2|} a\overline{|g,n\rangle}|^2, \label{gamma}\] which can be written as \[see Eqs. ([\[en-bar\]](#en-bar){reference-type="ref" reference="en-bar"})--([\[tan-2theta\]](#tan-2theta){reference-type="ref" reference="tan-2theta"})\] \[\gamma_{E} (n)=\kappa (\sqrt{n-1}\sin\theta_n\cos\theta_{n-1} -\sqrt{n}\sin\theta_{n-1}\cos\theta_n )^2. \label{gamma-explicit}\] Similar to Eq. ([\[Gamma-R\]](#Gamma-R){reference-type="ref" reference="Gamma-R"}) this rate should be averaged, \[\gamma_{E} = \left [ \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} P(n) \, \gamma_{E}(n) \right] / \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} P(n), \label{gamma-e}\] over the probability distribution \(P(n)\) for the states \(\overline{|g,n\rangle}\), for which we will use the coherent-state approximation ([\[coh-distr\]](#coh-distr){reference-type="ref" reference="coh-distr"}) with mean photon number \(\bar n\) (a better notation used in the next subsection is \(\bar n_g\)). The dependence of \(\gamma_E\) on \(\bar n\) is shown in Fig. [\[fig-gammaE\]](#fig-gammaE){reference-type="ref" reference="fig-gammaE"} by blue solid lines (\(\gamma_E\) is normalized by \(\Gamma_P\) and \(\bar n\) is normalized by \(n_{\rm crit}\)). Expanding \(\gamma_{E} (n)\) in powers of \(g/\Delta\) and carrying out the summation ([\[gamma-e\]](#gamma-e){reference-type="ref" reference="gamma-e"}) produces the series \[\begin{aligned} \label{Gaa1} \gamma_{E}&=\kappa\bar n^2\lambda^6\big[1-5\lambda^2(2\bar n+3)\notag\\ &+\lambda^4(69\bar n^2+276\bar n+159)+...\big], \end{aligned}\] which has the leading-order approximation \[\gamma_{E} \approx \frac{\Gamma_d }{16} \left(\frac{\bar{n}} {n_{\rm crit}}\right)^2 \label{gamma-E-approx}\] at \(1\ll \bar{n} \ll n_{\rm crit}\). This dependence is shown by the left dashed red line in Fig. [\[fig-gammaE\]](#fig-gammaE){reference-type="ref" reference="fig-gammaE"}; it works well only when \(\bar n/n_{\rm crit}\alt 0.1\). \[The truncated expansion ([\[Gaa1\]](#Gaa1){reference-type="ref" reference="Gaa1"}) works well until \(\bar n/n_{\rm crit}\alt 0.2\).\] Approximating Eq. ([\[gamma-explicit\]](#gamma-explicit){reference-type="ref" reference="gamma-explicit"}) in the opposite limit, \(\bar{n} \gg n_{\rm crit}\), gives \[\gamma_{E} \approx \Gamma_d \frac{n_{\rm crit}}{4\bar n} \left[1-2 \left(\frac{n_{\rm crit}}{\bar n}\right)^{1/2} + 3\left(\frac{n_{\rm crit}}{\bar n}\right)^{3/2} \right], \label{gamma-E-lim}\] which is shown by the right dashed red line in Fig. [\[fig-gammaE\]](#fig-gammaE){reference-type="ref" reference="fig-gammaE"}. The approximation for arbitrary \(\bar n/n_{\rm crit}\), which assumes \(\bar n\gg 1\) and \(n_{\rm crit} \agt 1\) \[derived similar to Eq. ([\[Gamma-large-n\]](#Gamma-large-n){reference-type="ref" reference="Gamma-large-n"})\] is \[\gamma_E \approx \frac{\kappa \textit{g}^2}{4\Delta^2} \left(\frac{1}{1+\bar n/n_{\rm crit}} -\frac{1}{\sqrt{1+\bar n/n_{\rm crit}}}\right)^2. \label{gammaE-large-n}\] Note that for \(\bar n \alt n_{\rm crit}\) the excitation rate is much smaller than the relaxation rate, \(\gamma_{E}/\Gamma_{R} \alt (\bar n/4 n_{\rm crit})^2\ll 1\). However, for \(\bar n \gg n_{\rm crit}\) the relaxation and excitation rates become identical in the leading order, as follows from Eqs. ([\[Gamma-R-lim\]](#Gamma-R-lim){reference-type="ref" reference="Gamma-R-lim"}) and ([\[gamma-E-lim\]](#gamma-E-lim){reference-type="ref" reference="gamma-E-lim"}) (we were not able to reach this regime in numerical simulations discussed in Sec. IV). The dependence \(\gamma_E ({\bar n})\) has a maximum (Fig. [\[fig-gammaE\]](#fig-gammaE){reference-type="ref" reference="fig-gammaE"}), which for \(|\Delta/\textit{g}|>3\) occurs at \({\bar n}\approx 3 n_{\rm crit}\) \[this value follows from Eq. ([\[gammaE-large-n\]](#gammaE-large-n){reference-type="ref" reference="gammaE-large-n"})\] Even at this maximum the excitation rate is much smaller than the no-drive relaxation rate, \(\gamma_E/\Gamma_P < 0.02\), as seen in Fig. [\[fig-gammaE\]](#fig-gammaE){reference-type="ref" reference="fig-gammaE"} \[the maximum value which follows from the approximation ([\[gammaE-large-n\]](#gammaE-large-n){reference-type="ref" reference="gammaE-large-n"}) is \(\gamma_E=\Gamma_d/64\)\]. Our derivation for the relaxation and excitation rates \(\Gamma_R\) and \(\gamma_E\) was based on considering only the "jump" processes caused by the operator \(a\) and finding their contribution to transitions between the two ladders of eigenstates in Fig. [\[fig-JC\]](#fig-JC){reference-type="ref" reference="fig-JC"}. The remaining (non-unitary) "no jump" evolution and the unitary evolution due to the drive with amplitude \(\varepsilon\) also contribute to transitions between the two ladders of eigenstates. However, since these transitions are non-stochastic, the energy shift between the two ladders suppresses the transitions (as expected for a coherent off-resonant process) and prevents the linear-in-time increase of the "wrong" ladder population. This is why these processes are not expected to contribute directly to the relaxation and excitation rates. Nevertheless, the evolution due to the drive and due to the absence of jumps effectively changes the ladders of eigenstates. Thus, at very large \(\bar n\) our results ([\[Gamma-R-n-2\]](#Gamma-R-n-2){reference-type="ref" reference="Gamma-R-n-2"}) and ([\[gamma-explicit\]](#gamma-explicit){reference-type="ref" reference="gamma-explicit"}) for the relaxation and excitation rates are expected to become invalid. ## Purcell rate with drive: Formal approach The results of the previous subsection were based on a physical intuition, leading to Eqs. ([\[Gamma-R-n\]](#Gamma-R-n){reference-type="ref" reference="Gamma-R-n"}) and ([\[gamma\]](#gamma){reference-type="ref" reference="gamma"}). Here we present a formal derivation of the analytical expression for the Purcell rate with the microwave drive. In the formal approach we need to assume the slightly nonlinear dispersive regime: \(|\Delta/g|\gg 1\) and \(\bar n/n_{\rm crit}\ll 1\). The derivation essentially follows the formalism developed in Ref.. We first transform the master equation [\[mast\]](#mast){reference-type="eqref" reference="mast"} to the frame where the JC Hamiltonian is diagonal. While it is simple for wavefunctions \[see Eqs. ([\[en-bar\]](#en-bar){reference-type="ref" reference="en-bar"}) and ([\[gn-bar\]](#gn-bar){reference-type="ref" reference="gn-bar"})\], it is not so simple for the operator form of the Hamiltonian. This can be done by introducing the transformation \(\textbf{D}\) of the form \[\textbf{D}=e^{-\Lambda (N_{e}) I_{-}},\] where \[I_{\pm}=\sigma_{+}a\pm\sigma_{-}a^{\dag}, \,\,\, N_{e}=a^{\dag}a+|e\rangle\langle e|,\] \(N_e\) is the number operator for total excitations in the system and the function \(\Lambda(N_{e})\) still has to be determined. After this transformation the master equation reads \[\label{mastd} \dot \rho^{\textbf{D}}=-i[H_{I}^{\textbf{D}},\rho^{\textbf{D}}] +\kappa\mathcal{D}[a^{\textbf{D}}]\rho^{\textbf{D}},\] where \[\label{tra} \rho^{\textbf{D}}=\textbf{D}^{\dag}\rho\textbf{D}, \,\,\, a^{\textbf{D}}=\textbf{D}^{\dag}a\textbf{D}, \,\,\, H_{I}^{\textbf{D}} = \textbf{D}^{\dag} H_{I} \textbf{D}, \qquad\] and \(H_I\) is given by Eq. ([\[ham\]](#ham){reference-type="ref" reference="ham"}) (in our notation the wavefunctions are transformed with \(\textbf{D}^\dagger\) rather than with \(\textbf{D}\)). The JC part of the transformed Hamiltonian, \(H_{JC}^{\textbf{D}}=(\Delta /2) \sigma_{z}^{\textbf{D}}+\textit{g}I_{+}^{\textbf{D}}\), can then be written as \[\begin{aligned} \label{ham0} H_{JC}^{\textbf{D}}&=\left[\frac{\Delta}{2}\cos(2\Lambda\sqrt{N_{e}}) -\textit{g}\sqrt{N_{e}}\sin(2\Lambda\sqrt{N_{e}})\right]\sigma_{z} \notag\\ &+\left[\frac{\Delta}{2\sqrt{N_{e}}}\sin(2\Lambda\sqrt{N_{e}}) +\textit{g}\cos(2\Lambda\sqrt{N_{e}})\right]I_{+}, \end{aligned}\] where \(\Lambda=\Lambda(N_e)\). Note that here we treated the operator \(N_e\) in the square root as a *c*-number. This is possible because \(N_e\) is a positive operator and its square root is defined via taking the square root of the eigenvalues in the diagonalizing basis. Also note that \(\Lambda\) commutes with \(\sqrt{N_e}\), and that the \(\sqrt{N_e}\) in denominator is canceled when the sine function is expanded. Since we want to diagonalize the JC Hamiltonian, we need to eliminate the second line of Eq. ([\[ham0\]](#ham0){reference-type="ref" reference="ham0"}) by zeroing the coefficient of \(I_{+}\), which can be done by choosing \[\label{angle} \Lambda=-\frac{1}{2\sqrt{N_{e}}}\arctan\left(\sqrt{4\lambda^2N_{e}} \right ).\] Then the transformed JC Hamiltonian is only the first line of Eq. ([\[ham0\]](#ham0){reference-type="ref" reference="ham0"}), which using Eq. [\[angle\]](#angle){reference-type="eqref" reference="angle"} can be written as \[\begin{aligned} \label{ham1} H_{JC}^{D}&=\frac{\Delta}{2}\sqrt{1+4\lambda^2 N_{e}}~\sigma_{z} =\frac{\Delta}{2}\sqrt{1+N_{e}/n_{\rm crit}}~\sigma_{z}. \end{aligned}\] This is exactly the desired Hamiltonian for the qubit-resonator system in the eigenbasis--see Eq. ([\[E-eigen\]](#E-eigen){reference-type="ref" reference="E-eigen"}). Next, we find explicit form of the \(\textbf{D}\)-transformed annihilation operator \(a\), which enters the drive Hamiltonian and the Lindblad term of the master equation ([\[mastd\]](#mastd){reference-type="ref" reference="mastd"}). Calculating \(\textbf{D}^{\dag}a\textbf{D}\) by expanding the exponent in the definition of \(\textbf{D}\), we obtain \[\label{ad-formula} a^{\textbf{D}}=a-[a,\Lambda I_{-}]+\frac{1}{2!}[[a,\Lambda I_{-} ],\Lambda I_{-} ]+... \,\,.\] Then by expanding \(\Lambda(N_{e})\) \[using Eq. ([\[angle\]](#angle){reference-type="ref" reference="angle"})\] in powers of \(\sqrt{4\lambda^2 N_{e}}\) with the assumption that \(\sqrt{4\lambda^2 N_{e}}<1\) (i.e. \(N_e <n_{\rm crit}\)) and explicitly computing the resulting commutation relations, we obtain after a lengthy algebra the following expression, \[\label{ad} a^{\textbf{D}}=a^{\textbf{D}}_{1}+a^{\textbf{D}}_{2}+a^{\textbf{D}}_{3},\] with \[\begin{aligned} \label{aD1} && a^{\textbf{D}}_{1}=\Big\{1+\frac{\lambda^2}{2}\sigma_{z}-\frac{\lambda^4}{8}[12(\hat n+1)\sigma_{z}+1] \notag\\ && \hspace{0.7cm} +\lambda^6 \Big[\Big(5\hat n^2+10\hat n +\frac{73}{16}\Big)\sigma_{z}+\frac{\hat n+1}{4}\Big]+...\Big\}a, \qquad \\ \label{aD2} && a^{\textbf{D}}_{2}=\lambda\Big\{1-\frac{3}{2}\lambda^2(2\hat n+1) +\lambda^4\Big(11\hat n^2+11\hat n+\frac{31}{8}\Big) \notag\\ && \hspace{0.7cm}-\lambda^6\Big(42\hat n^3+63\hat n^2+\frac{355}{8}\hat n+\frac{187}{16}\Big)+...\Big\}\sigma_{-}, \\ \label{aD3} && a^{\textbf{D}}_{3}=\lambda^3\Big\{1-\frac{5\lambda^2}{2}(2\hat n+3) +\lambda^4\Big(22\hat n^2+66\hat n+\frac{411}{8}\Big) \notag\\ && \hspace{0.7cm} +...\Big\}a^2\sigma_{+}, \end{aligned}\] where \(\hat n=a^{\dag}a\) is the photon number operator. Note that in the transformed frame the field operator \(a^{\textbf{D}}\) acquires a qubit part (\(a^{\textbf{D}}_{2}\) is proportional to \(\sigma_{-}\) and \(a^{\textbf{D}}_{3}\) is proportional to \(a^2\sigma_{+}\)). Equation [\[ad\]](#ad){reference-type="eqref" reference="ad"} has the following interpretation. Each term describes an "annihilation" process, which reduces the number of excitations by 1. The first term \(a^{\textbf{D}}_{1}\) (proportional to \(a\)) describes annihilation of a photon in the eigenbasis, which is modified due to the presence of the qubit. The second term \(a^{\textbf{D}}_{2}\), which describes qubit relaxation, also reduces the number of excitations by 1. Thus the photon annihilation process is partly converted into qubit relaxation: this second term eventually leads to the Purcell relaxation. The last term \(a^{\textbf{D}}_{3}\), which describes annihilation of two photons and qubit excitation, also reduces the number of excitations by 1. This process leads to qubit excitation as a result of leakage of photons through the resonator. There are no more groups of terms because qubit cannot absorb or emit more than one excitation, and thus there are no more processes decreasing the total number of excitations by 1. It is interesting to relate the terms in Eq. ([\[ad\]](#ad){reference-type="ref" reference="ad"}) with the matrix elements of \(a\) in the eigenbasis, considered in the previous subsection. Since \(a^{\textbf{D}}\) is essentially the operator \(a\) in the eigenbasis, we would expect that \(a^{\textbf{D}}\) sandwiched between two bare states should be equal to the operator \(a\) sandwiched between the corresponding eigenstates so that \[\begin{aligned} \label{ev1} && \overline{\langle e,n-1|}a\overline{|e,n\rangle}= \langle e,n-1|a^{\textbf{D}}_{1}|e,n\rangle, \\ \label{ev2} && \overline{\langle g,n|}a\overline{|e,n\rangle}= \langle g,n|a^{\textbf{D}}_{2}|e,n\rangle, \\ \label{ev3} && \overline{\langle e,n-2|}a\overline{|g,n\rangle}= \langle e,n-2|a^{\textbf{D}}_{3}|g,n\rangle. \end{aligned}\] We have checked these relations explicitly using the truncated expansions ([\[aD1\]](#aD1){reference-type="ref" reference="aD1"})--([\[aD3\]](#aD3){reference-type="ref" reference="aD3"}) and corresponding expansions of the eigenstates ([\[en-bar\]](#en-bar){reference-type="ref" reference="en-bar"})--([\[tan-2theta\]](#tan-2theta){reference-type="ref" reference="tan-2theta"}). These relations give us an insight why the formal-approach results which we will obtain later are essentially equivalent to the results of the simple approach. The next step in the derivation is to use the polaron-type transformation described below. ### Polaron-type transformation {#polaron-type-transformation .unnumbered} We expect that in the eigenbasis the quasi-stationary state is close to a coherent state within the subspace of "excited" eigenstates (right ladder of red dashed lines in Fig. [\[fig-JC\]](#fig-JC){reference-type="ref" reference="fig-JC"}) and also close to a (possibly different) coherent state within the subspace of "ground state" eigenstates (left ladder of dashed lines). Therefore, it is natural to apply displacement transformations within these (eigen) ladders, which transform the coherent states to the lowest levels in the ladders. In this way the case with the microwave drive should, to a considerable extent, be reduced to the case without the microwave drive, thus simplifying the analysis. Formally, we apply the polaron-type transformation \(\textbf{P}\) to the master equation [\[mastd\]](#mastd){reference-type="eqref" reference="mastd"}, so that the density operator transforms as \(\rho^{\textbf{DP}}=\textbf{P}^{\dag}\rho^{\textbf{D}}\textbf{P}\) with \[\label{P} \textbf{P}=|e\rangle\langle e|D(\alpha_{e}) +|g\rangle\langle g|D(\alpha_{g}),\] where \(D(\alpha)\) is the usual displacement operator and \(\alpha_{e(g)}\) are resonator field amplitudes corresponding to the qubit state \(|e\rangle\) or \(|g\rangle\). Note that Eq. ([\[P\]](#P){reference-type="ref" reference="P"}) formally uses the bare states, but the conversion between bare states and eigenstates is already performed by the transformation \(\textbf{D}\). Also note that we apply \(\textbf{P}^{\dag}\) (not \(\textbf{P}\)) to the wavefunctions, so this is a displacement by \(-\alpha_{e(g)}\). So far the amplitudes \(\alpha_{e}(t)\) and \(\alpha_{g}(t)\) are arbitrary and in general time-dependent. The master equation after the polaron-type transformation becomes \[\begin{aligned} \label{ma} \hspace{-0.05cm} \dot \rho^{\textbf{DP}}=&-i[H_{JC}^{\textbf{DP}}+ \varepsilon(a^{\textbf{DP}}+a^{\dag \textbf{DP}}), \rho^{\textbf{DP}}] +\kappa\mathcal{D}[a^{\textbf{ DP}}]\rho^{\textbf{DP}}\notag\\ &+i[\text{Im}(T_{\alpha}\dot{T}_{\alpha}^{*}),\rho^{\textbf{DP}}] +[a\dot{T}_{\alpha}^{*}-a^{\dag}\dot{T}_{\alpha},\rho^{\textbf{DP}}], \end{aligned}\] where \(T_{\alpha}=\alpha_{e}|e\rangle\langle e|+\alpha_{g}|g\rangle\langle g|\) and the second line in this equation is due to time-dependence of \(\alpha_{e}(t)\) and \(\alpha_{g}(t)\). The explicit form of the master equation ([\[ma\]](#ma){reference-type="ref" reference="ma"}) is very lengthy and we do not present it here. Its perturbative form can be obtained by first expanding the Hamiltonian \(H_{JC}^{\textbf{D}}\) in powers of \(N_{e}/n_{\rm crit}\) \[see Eq. ([\[ham1\]](#ham1){reference-type="ref" reference="ham1"})\] and then applying the \(\textbf{P}\)-transformation to the field and qubit operators, \[\begin{aligned} \label{a} && \textbf{P}^{\dag}a {\textbf{P}}=a+T_{\alpha}, \\ && \sigma_{z}^{\textbf{P}}=\sigma_{z}, \,\,\, \textbf{P}^{\dag}\sigma_{-} {\textbf{P}}=D(\alpha_{g})^{\dag}D(\alpha_{e})\sigma_{-}, \end{aligned}\] while the transformation of higher-order terms for field operators can be obtained using sequential application of [\[a\]](#a){reference-type="eqref" reference="a"}, for example, \[\begin{aligned} && \textbf{P}^{\dag}\hat n{\textbf{P}}=\hat n+aT_{\alpha}^{*}+a^{\dag}T_{\alpha}+|T_{\alpha}|^2, \\ && \textbf{P}^{\dag} \hat n^2 {\textbf{P}}=[(1+2|T_{\alpha}|^2)T_{\alpha}^{*}a+a^2T_{\alpha}^{*2} +2\hat na T_{\alpha}^{*}+\text{H.c.}] \notag\\ && \hspace{1.5cm} +|T_{\alpha}|^2(4\hat n+1)+\hat n^2+|T_{\alpha}|^4. \end{aligned}\] Now we want to find "good" values of \(\alpha_e\) and \(\alpha_g\), which correspond to the quasi-stationary state. This can be done using the following trick. Let us impose the condition that the total coefficient for the operator \(a^{\dag}\) in the transformed master equation [\[ma\]](#ma){reference-type="eqref" reference="ma"} is zero (then the coefficient for \(a\) also vanishes automatically). This would correspond to the situation without drive (in the effective frame), and then because of the relaxation due to \(\kappa\), the lowest state within each ladder will be eventually reached, independent of the initial state. \[This will not be exact because of non-zero terms \((a^\dagger)^2\), \((a^\dagger)^3\), etc., but this is good as an approximation.\] Imposing this condition and keeping terms up to \(\lambda^4\), we obtain equations \[\begin{aligned} \label{al} \dot\alpha_{j}(t)\approx &-\frac{\kappa}{2} \left[1\pm\lambda^2(1-6\lambda^2 \bar n_{j})\right]\alpha_{j} \notag\\ &+i\chi\{\lambda^2\mp [1-2\lambda^2(\bar n_{j}+1)]\}\alpha_{j} \notag\\ &-i\varepsilon\left\{1-\frac{\lambda^4}{8}\pm \frac{\lambda^2}{2} \left[1-3\lambda^2(2\bar n_{j}+1)\right]\right\}, \end{aligned}\] with the top sign for \(j=e\) and the bottom sign for \(j=g\); here \(\bar n_{j}=|\alpha_{j}|^2\) is the corresponding mean photon number and \(\chi=g^2/\Delta\) is the resonator frequency shift in the strong dispersive regime (\(\lambda\ll 1\), \(\bar n_{j} \ll n_{\rm crit}\)). In Eq. [\[al\]](#al){reference-type="eqref" reference="al"} the term proportional to \(\kappa\) is a contribution from the Lindblad master equation, the term proportional to \(\chi\) is a contribution from JC Hamiltonian, and the last term is due to the microwave drive. It is easy to see that Eq. [\[al\]](#al){reference-type="eqref" reference="al"} is essentially the equation for classical field amplitudes \(\alpha_{e(g)}(t)\), as expected. The stationary solution of this equation, \(\dot\alpha_{j}(t)=0\), gives the steady-state values \(\alpha_e\) and \(\alpha_g\), which are then substituted into the master equation ([\[ma\]](#ma){reference-type="ref" reference="ma"}). With these "good" values of \(\alpha_e\) and \(\alpha_g\), we expect a significant population of only two states in the \(\textbf{D}\textbf{P}\)-transformed frame: \(|e,0\rangle\) and \(|g,0\rangle\). We also expect that these populations, \(\rho_{e0,e0}^{\textbf{DP}}\) and \(\rho_{g0,g0}^{\textbf{DP}}\), are close to the total occupation of the right and left ladders of eigenstates in Fig. [\[fig-JC\]](#fig-JC){reference-type="ref" reference="fig-JC"}. Therefore the transition rates between the states \(|e,0\rangle\) and \(|g,0\rangle\) in the \(\textbf{D}\textbf{P}\)-transformed frame should give the relaxation and excitation rates for the qubit; these rates can now be found from Eq. ([\[ma\]](#ma){reference-type="ref" reference="ma"}). The expansion form of the equation for \(\dot{\rho}_{e0,e0}^{\textbf{DP}}\) is very lengthy and we do not show it here, but if we keep only the terms with \(\rho_{e0,e0}^{\textbf{DP}}\) and \(\rho_{g0,g0}^{\textbf{DP}}\), we then obtain \[\label{eq} \dot \rho_{e0,e0}^{\textbf{DP}}\approx -\Gamma_{R}\rho_{e0,e0}^{\textbf{DP}} +\gamma_{E}\rho_{g0,g0}^{\textbf{DP}},\] where (to order \(\lambda^8\)) we find \[\begin{aligned} \label{gt} \Gamma_{R}&=\kappa \lambda^2\big[1-3\lambda^2(2\bar n_{e}+1)+\lambda^4(31 \bar n^2_{e}+62\bar n_{e}+10)\notag\\ &-\lambda^6(150\bar n_{e}^3+675\bar n_{e}^2+520 \bar n_{e}+35)\big], \end{aligned}\] and (to order \(\lambda^{10}\)) \[\begin{aligned} \label{Gab1} \gamma_{E}=\kappa \bar n_{g}^2\lambda^6\big[1-5\lambda^2(2\bar n_{g}+3) +\lambda^4(69\bar n_{g}^2+276\bar n_{g}+159)\big]. \end{aligned}\] These results for the relaxation and excitation rates \(\Gamma_R\) and \(\gamma_E\) are in exact agreement with Eqs. [\[Gamma-R-exp\]](#Gamma-R-exp){reference-type="eqref" reference="Gamma-R-exp"} and [\[Gaa1\]](#Gaa1){reference-type="eqref" reference="Gaa1"}, obtained using the simple intuitive approach. Note however that since our formal derivation was based on the expansion in \(\lambda\), it can be used only for relatively small values of the nonlinearity parameter \(\bar n_{e(g)}/n_{\rm crit}\) (see, e.g., the green dashed line in Fig. [\[fig-Gamma\]](#fig-Gamma){reference-type="ref" reference="fig-Gamma"}), in contrast to the simple approach. Thus the results ([\[gt\]](#gt){reference-type="ref" reference="gt"}) and ([\[Gab1\]](#Gab1){reference-type="ref" reference="Gab1"}) of the formal approach confirm that the Purcell relaxation rate decreases with increasing strength of the microwave drive, and there exists a relatively weak qubit excitation due to resonator damping. The results of the formal approach are essentially an extension of the previous work, where only the leading order was considered, and hence the photon-number-dependent Purcell rate and the excitation rate were not obtained. ## Physical interpretation We do not have a compete physical interpretation of the Purcell relaxation suppression due to additional photons induced by the microwave drive, so we may say that this is just the mathematical property of the matrix element \(\overline{\langle g,n|}a\overline{|e,n\rangle}\) \[see Eq. ([\[Gamma-R-n\]](#Gamma-R-n){reference-type="ref" reference="Gamma-R-n"})\], which decreases with \(n\). However, we have a crude physical interpretation. The idea is that the additional drive changes the effective qubit frequency due to the ac (dynamic) Stark shift, which increases the detuning \(|\Delta|\). Then if we use the formula for the single-excitation Purcell rate \[Eqs. ([\[gcd\]](#gcd){reference-type="ref" reference="gcd"}) or ([\[ga\]](#ga){reference-type="ref" reference="ga"})\], we find the suppression of the rate with increasing mean photon number \(\bar n\). More quantitatively, the effective detuning with \({\bar n}\gg 1\) photons is the level splitting between the eigenstates of the JC ladder (see Figs. [\[fig-JC\]](#fig-JC){reference-type="ref" reference="fig-JC"} and [\[fig-ds\]](#fig-ds){reference-type="ref" reference="fig-ds"}), \[\Omega_S =\sqrt{\Delta^2+4{\bar n}\textit{g}^2}\, {\rm sgn}(\Delta)=\Delta \sqrt{1+{\bar n}/n_{\rm crit}}. \label{Omega-S}\] (Note that the resonator frequency changes by less than \(\textit{g}^2/\Delta=\Delta/4n_{\rm crit}\), so the change of effective detuning is mostly due to the qubit frequency change.) In the regime \({\bar n}\ll n_{\rm crit}\), this gives the effective detuning \(\Delta (1+{\bar n}/2n_{\rm crit})\). Therefore, if we use the dispersive single-excitation formula \(\Gamma_d=\kappa \textit{g}^2/\Delta^2\) \[Eq. ([\[gcd\]](#gcd){reference-type="ref" reference="gcd"})\] with increased \(|\Delta|\), we would expect the Purcell rate suppression as \(\Gamma_R \approx \Gamma_d (1-{\bar n}/n_{\rm crit})\), which is different from the actual result \[Eq. ([\[Gamma-R-approx\]](#Gamma-R-approx){reference-type="ref" reference="Gamma-R-approx"})\] by the missing factor \(3/2\). The additional suppression could in principle be explained by the change of effective \(\kappa\) (due to decreasing overlap); however, we did not find a reasonable quantitative explanation of this kind. Besides the difficulty with quantitative explanation of the suppression, a natural question is why we can still use the no-drive formula ([\[gcd\]](#gcd){reference-type="ref" reference="gcd"}), essentially mixing the linear and nonlinear approaches to the dynamics. Thus we cannot call the physical interpretation based on the ac Stark shift a perfect interpretation. Note that it is also possible to discuss the reduction of the qubit relaxation rate and appearance of the nonzero excitation rate in terms of the Mollow triplet physics at non-zero detuning \(\Delta\) (Fig. [\[fig-ds\]](#fig-ds){reference-type="ref" reference="fig-ds"}). In our case the triplet is transformed into a quadruplet (neglecting the "fine structure" due to \(n\)-dependence of the transition frequencies). The two central "peaks" correspond to the qubit-state-dependent resonator frequency \(\omega_{\rm r} \pm \textit{g}^2/\Omega_S\); the difference between them is used for the qubit readout (the quadruplet becomes a triplet if the dispersive shift \(\pm \textit{g}^2/\Omega_S\) is neglected, as in Fig. [\[fig-ds\]](#fig-ds){reference-type="ref" reference="fig-ds"}). The two side peaks correspond to the qubit relaxation and excitation (Fig. [\[fig-ds\]](#fig-ds){reference-type="ref" reference="fig-ds"}). In the case of relaxation the qubit emits the photon with frequency approximately \(\omega_{\rm r}+ \Omega_S\). In the case of excitation the qubit absorbs this energy, which is taken from two photons in the resonator, so that the photon emitted into the transmission line has frequency \(\omega_{\rm r}-\Omega_S\). With increasing drive (increasing \(\bar n\)) the side peaks move further away from the central peaks (ac Stark shift). As discussed above, this leads to the suppression of the relaxation rate \(\Gamma_R\) (at least qualitatively). The excitation rate \(\gamma_E\) first increases with increasing \(\bar n\), as expected for a two-photon process, but eventually the suppression due to increasing detuning becomes the dominating effect, and \(\gamma_E\) starts to decrease. # Numerical results Besides developing the analytical approaches discussed in the previous section, we have also solved the full master equation ([\[mast\]](#mast){reference-type="ref" reference="mast"}) for the qubit-resonator system numerically and thus computed the qubit relaxation and excitation rates. In this section we present the numerical results and compare them with analytical results. ## Qubit relaxation rate Since we do not consider intrinsic qubit relaxation as well as dressed dephasing (a process which converts pure depahsing into photon-number-dependent qubit relaxation), the decay rate obtained from the numerical solution is only due to the Purcell effect. To calculate the relaxation rate we start with an initial state that is the coherent-state superposition of the eigenstates corresponding to the excited state of the qubit (right ladder of red dashed lines in Fig. [\[fig-JC\]](#fig-JC){reference-type="ref" reference="fig-JC"}), \[\label{in} |\psi_{\text{in}}\rangle=e^{-|\alpha_{\text{in}}|^2/2} \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{\alpha_{\text{in}}^n}{\sqrt{n!}} \, \overline{|e,n\rangle},\] where \(\alpha_{\rm in}\) is the initial amplitude of the resonator field. For \(\alpha_{\rm in}\) we use the value \(\alpha_{\rm in}=-i\varepsilon/[i(\textit{g}^2/\Delta +\omega_{\rm r}-\omega_{\rm d}) +\kappa/2]\), obtained classically by assuming that the resonator frequency is increased by \(\textit{g}^2/\Delta\) due to the qubit in the excited state (recall that the driving frequency \(\omega_{\rm d}\) is exactly \(\omega_{\rm r}\)). The corresponding mean photon number is \({\bar n}_{\rm in} = |\alpha_{\text{in}}|^2=4|\varepsilon|^2/[4 (\textit{g}^2/\Delta +\omega_{\rm r}-\omega_{\rm d})^2+\kappa^2]\). However, this initial value of \(\alpha_{\rm in}\) is good only in the linear regime when \(\bar n \ll n_{\rm crit}\). In the non-linear regime the effective resonator frequency becomes (see Fig. [\[fig-JC\]](#fig-JC){reference-type="ref" reference="fig-JC"}) \(\omega_{\rm r}+ \Delta (\sqrt{1+{\bar n}/n_{crit}}-\sqrt{1+({\bar n}-1)/n_{\rm crit}}) \approx \omega_{\rm r}+\textit{g}^2/\Omega_S\), where the level splitting \(\Omega_S\) is given by Eq. ([\[Omega-S\]](#Omega-S){reference-type="ref" reference="Omega-S"}). Therefore the quasi-steady state is expected to have \(\alpha_e \approx-i\varepsilon/[i(\textit{g}^2/\Omega_S +\omega_{\rm r}-\omega_{\rm d}) +\kappa/2]\) and the corresponding mean photon number is expected to be \[\label{mn} \bar n=\frac{|\varepsilon|^2} {(g^2/\sqrt{\Delta^2+4g^2\bar n} +\omega_{\rm r}-\omega_{\rm d})^2+(\kappa/2)^2}.\] This equation allows easy calculation of \(\varepsilon\) for a desired \(\bar n\). Note that for the qubit in the ground state, the frequency shift \(\textit{g}^2/\Omega_S\) is replaced with \(-\textit{g}^2/\Omega_S\). However, since we use \(\omega_{\rm d}=\omega_{\rm r}\), the mean photon number \(\bar n\) given by Eq. ([\[mn\]](#mn){reference-type="ref" reference="mn"}) does not change. Therefore, \(\bar n\) is not affected by the Purcell relaxation. Also note that Eq. ([\[mn\]](#mn){reference-type="ref" reference="mn"}) does not show bistability when \(\omega_{\rm d}=\omega_{\rm r}\), though the bistability occurs for a range of detuning \(\omega_{\rm d}-\omega_{\rm r}\neq 0\) if \(\kappa < 4\textit{g}^4 {\bar n}/\Omega_S^3\). In simulations we first find \(\varepsilon\) for a desired \(\bar n\) analytically, but then calculate the actual \(\bar n\) numerically. We have checked that Eq. ([\[mn\]](#mn){reference-type="ref" reference="mn"}) works quite well for the parameters we used, but still not perfectly. We use the bare basis to compute the evolution using the master equation ([\[mast\]](#mast){reference-type="ref" reference="mast"}), but then convert the results into the eigenbasis; in particular, we monitor the population of the exited qubit state in the eigenbasis, \[\overline{\rho}_{ee} (t)= \sum\nolimits_n {\rm Tr} [\rho (t) \, \overline{|e,n\rangle}\,\, \overline{\langle e,n|}\, ].\] The use of the initial condition ([\[in\]](#in){reference-type="ref" reference="in"}) allows us to mostly avoid initial oscillations of \(\overline{\rho}_{ee} (t)\) (decaying on the timescale \(\sim \kappa^{-1}\)), so that the decay of \(\overline{\rho}_{ee}\) is smooth in time, and therefore the Purcell rate \(\Gamma_R\) can be relatively easily defined numerically as the slope of the dependence \(-\ln [\overline{\rho}_{ee}(t)]\), which is close to a straight line for a sufficiently long duration. Note that because of a non-zero excitation rate, the dependence \(\overline{\rho}_{ee}(t)\) eventually saturates at a non-zero value; therefore it is necessary to restrict the time duration, making sure that \(\overline{\rho}_{ee}\) remains much larger than the saturation value. Red dots in Fig. [\[fig-Gamma-num\]](#fig-Gamma-num){reference-type="ref" reference="fig-Gamma-num"} show the numerically calculated Purcell rate \(\Gamma_R\) \[normalized by the no-drive value \(\Gamma_P\) given by Eq. ([\[ga\]](#ga){reference-type="ref" reference="ga"})\] as a function of the steady-state mean photon number \(\bar n\) in the resonator, for \(\kappa = \textit{g}\) and several values of \(\Delta/\textit{g}\) (the calculations have been done for \(\textit{g}/2\pi =50\) MHz, but the results do not depend on \(\textit{g}\) because of the linear overall scaling). The solid lines show the approximate analytical result, obtained in the simple approach, Eq. ([\[Gamma-R\]](#Gamma-R){reference-type="ref" reference="Gamma-R"}). We see a very good agreement between the analytics and numerics. It is important that the Purcell rate continues to decrease when \(\bar n\) is significantly larger than \(n_{\rm crit}\), and agreement with analytics is still very good in this regime. The numerical results confirm that the Purcell rate suppression can be more than an order of magnitude. The analytics \[Eqs. ([\[Gamma-R-n\]](#Gamma-R-n){reference-type="ref" reference="Gamma-R-n"})--([\[Gamma-R\]](#Gamma-R){reference-type="ref" reference="Gamma-R"})\] predict that the Purcell rate \(\Gamma_R\) scales linearly with \(\kappa\) (keeping the same \(\bar n\)). In Fig. [\[fig-Gamma-num2\]](#fig-Gamma-num2){reference-type="ref" reference="fig-Gamma-num2"} we check this scaling numerically by comparing the results for \(\kappa/\textit{g}=1\) (red dots, same as in Fig. [\[fig-Gamma-num\]](#fig-Gamma-num){reference-type="ref" reference="fig-Gamma-num"}) and for \(\kappa/\textit{g}=0.1\) (blue diamonds). (Note that \(\kappa/\textit{g}=0.1\) and even lower values are typical in circuit QED experiments). We see that the numerical results confirm, at least in this regime, the simple scaling of \(\Gamma_R\) with \(\kappa\) (so that \(\Gamma_R/\Gamma_P\) does not depend on \(\kappa\)) for the same value of \(\bar n\). Note however that decreasing \(\kappa\) assumes decreasing drive amplitude \(\varepsilon\) to keep \(\bar n\) fixed. ## Qubit excitation rate We have also calculated numerically the qubit excitation rate due to the resonator decay. For that we start with the initial state, which is the superposition of the eigenstates corresponding to the ground state of the qubit: \[\label{ing} |\psi_{\text{in}}\rangle=e^{-|\alpha_{\rm in}|^2/2} \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{\alpha_{\text{in}}^n}{\sqrt{n!}} \, \overline{|g,n\rangle},\] where \(\alpha_{\rm in}\) now corresponds to the ground state of the qubit, \(\alpha_{\rm in}=-i\varepsilon/[i(-\textit{g}^2/\Delta +\omega_{\rm r}-\omega_{\rm d})+ \kappa/2]\) or in a better approximation \(\alpha_g =-i\varepsilon/[i(-\textit{g}^2/\Omega_S +\omega_{\rm r}-\omega_{\rm d})+ \kappa/2]\). Since we use \(\omega_{\rm d}=\omega_{\rm r}\), only the phase of \(\alpha_{\rm in}\) is different from what was used in Eq. ([\[in\]](#in){reference-type="ref" reference="in"}), while \(\bar n_{\rm in}\) is still the same. Note that the initial value \(\alpha_{\rm in}\) is not very important because the system converges to the quasi-steady-state value of \(\alpha\) within few resonator lifetimes \(\kappa^{-1}\). Similar to what was discussed in the previous subsection, we calculate the quasi-steady-state value of \(\bar n\) numerically. Following the same procedure as for computing the qubit relaxation rate, we calculate the qubit excitation rate \(\gamma_E\). The only difference is that now we monitor the decrease of \(\overline{\rho}_{gg}(t)=1-\overline{\rho}_{ee}(t)\), and the qubit excitation rate \(\gamma_{ E}\) is defined numerically as the negative slope of \(\ln [\overline{\rho}_{gg}(t)]\) during a time range when this dependence is linear (this time range should be much shorter than \(\Gamma_R^{-1}\)). Figure [\[fig-gammaE-num\]](#fig-gammaE-num){reference-type="ref" reference="fig-gammaE-num"} shows the excitation rate \(\gamma_{E}\) normalized by the no-drive Purcell rate \(\Gamma_{P}\) \[Eq. ([\[ga\]](#ga){reference-type="ref" reference="ga"})\], as a function of the mean photon number \(\bar n\). The excitation rate is quite weak and first increases with the strength of the microwave field. The rate also depends on the detuning: the smaller the detuning, the larger the excitation rate becomes. The rate calculated numerically agrees well with the analytical result given by Eqs. [\[gamma-e\]](#gamma-e){reference-type="eqref" reference="gamma-e"}. As discussed in Sec. IIIA, the dependence \(\gamma_E(\bar n)\) should reach maximum at \(\bar n \approx 3 n_{\rm crit}\) (when \(\Delta/\textit{g}>3\)). Figure [\[fig-gammaE-num\]](#fig-gammaE-num){reference-type="ref" reference="fig-gammaE-num"} confirms this behavior for \(\Delta/\textit{g}=5\). Even at the maximum, the value of \(\gamma_E\) remains much smaller than \(\Gamma_P\) (over 50 times), and at this point it is \(\sim 8\) times smaller than \(\Gamma_R\). # Conclusion We have analyzed the Purcell relaxation rate of a superconducting qubit coupled to a leaking microwave resonator, which is pumped on-resonance by an external microwave drive. The main result is that the Purcell rate \(\Gamma_R\) is suppressed due to the presence of photons in the resonator, with the strong suppression obtained in the nonlinear regime. The presence of photons in the resonator also leads to qubit excitation, but the excitation rate \(\gamma_E\) is always much smaller than the no-drive Purcell relaxation rate \(\Gamma_P\). We have derived approximate analytical formulas for the relaxation and excitation rates \[e.g., Eqs. ([\[Gamma-R-n-2\]](#Gamma-R-n-2){reference-type="ref" reference="Gamma-R-n-2"}), ([\[Gamma-large-n\]](#Gamma-large-n){reference-type="ref" reference="Gamma-large-n"}), ([\[gamma-explicit\]](#gamma-explicit){reference-type="ref" reference="gamma-explicit"}), and ([\[gammaE-large-n\]](#gammaE-large-n){reference-type="ref" reference="gammaE-large-n"})\], which agree well with the numerical results. In this work we assumed a time-independent drive amplitude \(\varepsilon\). It is rather simple to introduce a time-dependent drive \(\varepsilon (t)\) to describe experiments with short measurement time, as long as the dynamics is sufficiently adiabatic (which is almost always the case in experiments--see Ref. ). Using the simple intuitive approach (Sec. IIIA), we first solve the classical equations for the field with account of nonlinearity to find \(\bar n(t)\) and then obtain the corresponding time-dependent Purcell rate \(\Gamma_R (t)\) and the excitation rate \(\gamma_E(t)\). In the formal perturbative approach (Sec. IIIB) the evolution of the field can be taken into account automatically via Eq. ([\[al\]](#al){reference-type="ref" reference="al"}). To experimentally observe the Purcell rate suppression with increasing microwave drive predicted in this work, it is important to make sure that other mechanisms do not increase the qubit relaxation rate faster than the obtained suppression. One such mechanism for superconducting qubits is the dressed dephasing, which increases the relaxation rate as \(\Gamma_{\downarrow, {\rm dd}}\simeq \gamma_{\varphi}\bar n/2n_{\rm crit}\), where \(\gamma_{\varphi}\) is the pure dephasing rate (this formula assumes a similar noise spectrum at the qubit frequency \(\omega_{\rm q}\) and at low frequency). This increase is weaker than the first-order Purcell rate suppression \(-3\bar n\Gamma_{P}/2n_{\rm crit}\) \[see Eq. [\[Gamma-R-exp\]](#Gamma-R-exp){reference-type="eqref" reference="Gamma-R-exp"}\] if the no-drive Purcell rate \(\Gamma_P\approx \Gamma_d=\kappa \textit{g}^2/\Delta^2\) exceeds the pure dephasing, \(\Gamma_P >\gamma_\varphi /3\). Therefore, to observe the Purcell rate suppression experimentally, it may be necessary to deliberately increase the Purcell rate by decreasing the detuning \(\Delta\) and/or increasing the resonator damping rate \(\kappa\) and coupling \(\textit{g}\). Note an indication of possible Purcell rate suppression in a recent experiment--see Fig. S7 in Ref.İn this paper we treated the qubit as a two-level system. In reality, most of present-day superconducting qubits are essentially only slightly nonlinear oscillators, with almost equidistant energy spectrum. The anharmonicity \(\mathcal{A}=2E_{|e\rangle}-E_{|g\rangle}-E_{|f\rangle}\) (with \(|f\rangle\) being the next excited level) is typically much smaller than the qubit frequency (\(\mathcal{A}/\omega_{\rm q}\simeq 0.03-0.05\)) and only a few times larger than the coupling \(|\textit{g}|\). The presence of the level \(|f\rangle\) does not affect the no-drive Purcell rate \(\Gamma_P\); however, it affects the qubit relaxation and excitation rates when the microwave drive is applied. The analysis of this effect is beyond the scope of this paper, but we have done preliminary calculations based on the natural extension of Eqs. ([\[Gamma-R-n\]](#Gamma-R-n){reference-type="ref" reference="Gamma-R-n"}) and ([\[gamma\]](#gamma){reference-type="ref" reference="gamma"}), assuming that they are still applicable. These calculations show that the Purcell rate is still suppressed with increasing photon number \(\bar n\) in the typical regime (\(\mathcal{A}>0\), \(\omega_{\rm q} <\omega_{\rm r}\)), though the suppression is weaker than in the two-level model. We have also found that the suppression can still be crudely (not quantitatively) described as being due to the ac Stark shift of the qubit frequency. In the slightly nonlinear regime the repulsion of the level \(|e,n\rangle\) from the level \(|f,n-1\rangle\) (which is added to the repulsion between the levels \(|e,n\rangle\) and \(|g,n+1\rangle\)) leads to the effective detuning \(\Delta_{\rm eff}=\Delta + 2(n+1) \textit{g}^2/\Delta-n (\sqrt{2}\,\textit{g})^2/(\Delta-\mathcal{A})\), where \(\sqrt{2}\,\textit{g}\) is the approximate coupling constant for the transitions between \(|e\rangle\) and \(|f\rangle\). This can be rewritten as \[\Delta_{\rm eff}=\Delta \left( 1+ \frac{n}{2\tilde{n}_{\rm crit}} \right), \,\,\, \tilde{n}_{\rm crit} =\frac{\Delta^2}{4 \textit{g}^2} \, \frac{\mathcal{A}-\Delta}{\mathcal{A}}, \label{n-crit-tilde}\] where \(\tilde{n}_{\rm crit}\) is the appropriately redefined critical photon number ([\[n-crit\]](#n-crit){reference-type="ref" reference="n-crit"}), which takes into account the third level, and we assumed \(1\ll n\ll n_{\rm crit} \times \min [1, (\Delta-\mathcal{A})^2/2\Delta^2]\) (so that both level repulsions are in almost linear regimes). Note that the effective qubit-state-dependent change of the resonator frequency (which is used for the qubit measurement) is governed by the similar factor, \(\omega_{{\rm r},|e\rangle}^{\rm eff}-\omega_{{\rm r},|g\rangle}^{\rm eff} = d\Delta_{\rm eff}/dn=\Delta/(2\tilde{n}_{\rm crit})\) for the same range of \(n\). Now crudely estimating the Purcell rate as \(\Gamma_R \simeq \kappa (\textit{g}/\Delta_{\rm eff})^2\), we obtain the crude estimate of the Purcell rate suppression as \(\Gamma_R/\Gamma_P\simeq 1-n/\tilde{n}_{\rm crit}\) when \(1\ll n\ll n_{\rm crit} \times \min [1, (\Delta-\mathcal{A})^2/2\Delta^2]\). This has the same form as Eq. ([\[Gamma-R-approx\]](#Gamma-R-approx){reference-type="ref" reference="Gamma-R-approx"}), with \(n_{\rm crit}\) replaced by \(\tilde{n}_{\rm crit}\) and with absent factor \(3/2\), which cannot be obtained in this crude derivation (preliminary numerical results indicate that this factor, describing the difference between the numerical suppression and the Stark-shift model becomes closer to 1). Note that for positive \(\mathcal{A}\) and negative \(\Delta\) (i.e. \(\omega_{\rm q}< \omega_{\rm r}\), which is the more typical situation for transmon qubits) the effective critical photon number ([\[n-crit-tilde\]](#n-crit-tilde){reference-type="ref" reference="n-crit-tilde"}) is increased, \(\tilde{n}_{\rm crit} > n_{\rm crit}\) (strongly increased if \(-\Delta \gg \mathcal{A}\)), and therefore the Purcell rate suppression is weaker than in the two-level model. (For large ratios \(-\Delta/\mathcal{A}\) preliminary numerical results indicate that the suppression is not as weak as follows from strongly increased \(\tilde{n}_{\rm crit}\).) A more complete analysis of the effect of the third and higher levels on the Purcell rate (including the numerical simulations as in Sec. IV) is the subject of a further research.

{'timestamp': '2014-03-24T01:09:27', 'yymm': '1401', 'arxiv_id': '1401.5545', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5545'}

# Abstract {#abstract .unnumbered} # Introduction Transportation and communication networks form the fabric of industrialized nations. The rollout of such infrastructure in such regions can play a major role in supporting, or deterring, a region's ability to thrive economically and socially. Likewise, citizens' use of these networks can tell us much about the region, including insight on how ideas and diseases may be spreading, or how to most effectively augment services, such as healthcare and education. Existing studies of mobile phone data have given us insight on numerous aspects of human mobility. However, these studies tend to focus on regions with the highest mobile phone coverage, which also happens to be in more stable, mature, and developed regions. Thus, the models produced based on this data might not be as appropriate for developing regions with a substantially different patterns of social interactions and human mobility. However, these highly industrialized and wealthy regions represent less than one-third of the world's population, with the remaining two-thirds living in developing and less economically mature regions. Although it is the developing regions which are facing the most rapid demographic and economic shifts worldwide, and are in even greater need of such models to help inform policy makers, urban planners, and service providers. Yet, little work has been done to assess the appropriateness of models conceptualized for industrialized regions for use in developing regions. Obtaining a comprehensive and accurate dataset of the telecommunication activity in developing regions can be extremely difficult for a number of reasons; however, the Data4Developoment (D4D) dataset provided a unique opportunity by collecting data throughout the Ivory Coast and releasing it specifically for research purposes, so that developing regions could also be analyzed in greater detail. With over 60 distinct tribes, Ivory Coast boasts rich cultural and linguistic diversity, in addition to its rapid urbanization. These contrasting social interactions offer researchers a unique opportunity to understand the communication and mobility patterns and needs of a developing nation during key phases of its transformation. Our goal was to leverage the contrast between mobility data from Ivory Coast with a more industrialized nation (Portugal) in order to assess the ability of human mobility models developed for industrialized regions to accurately model developing regions. Our findings shed new light on the applicability of metrics and models conceptualized for industrialized regions, to developing regions. Our results demonstrate the importance of considering cultural and linguistic diversity in the construction of new models to address the challenges of developing regions. The insights gained from our study have important applications to policymaking, urban planning, and the services deployments that are transforming Ivory Coast and many other developing countries. In the following sections, we provide additional details on the data used in this study, the results derived, and the conclusions drawn. # Data Description We used five datasets to assess and compare the human mobility patterns in the Ivory Coast and Portugal. The first two datasets, *D1* and *D2*, were provided by Orange telecom as *SET1* and *SET2* respectively, via the Data for Development (D4D) Challenge. Both datasets are based on anonymized Call Detail Records (CDRs) of 2.5 billion calls and SMS exchanges between 5 million users December 1, 2011 until April 28, 2012 (150 days). *SET1* provided the number and duration of all calls between any pair of antenna, aggregated by hour. Calls spanning multiple time slots were considered to be in the time slot when they began. Communication between Orange customers and customers of other providers were removed. *SET2* contains consecutive call activities of each subscriber over the study period. Each record in this dataset represents a single connection to an antenna and contains the following fields: timestamp, anonymized ID of the user, and the antenna ID they connected to. To further anonymize this data, the original dataset was subsampled to the calls of 50K randomly sampled individuals for each of 2-week periods in the dataset. The geographical positions of the antenna for *D1* and *D2* were also provided and are illustrated in Figure [\[intro_maps\]](#intro_maps){reference-type="ref" reference="intro_maps"}B. Records without antenna IDs were removed; 107 antennae had no calls and 128 antennae had no population movements. The third dataset, *D3*, was also provided by Orange with over 2000 antennae distributed across Portugal. *D3* included the same fields as *D2*, for 400 million anonymized CDRs from 2 million users, for the time period of January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2007. Datasets *D4* and *D5* provided a high-resolution population density data for Ivory Coast and Portugal, respectively. To map the population data to the antennae, we created a Voronoi tessellation of each country based on the antennae location. For the 12 locations that had 2-3 antennas in a single location, those 2-3 antennas were collapsed into a single Voronoi cell. Each antenna was assigned the total population within the corresponding Voronoi cell. Figure [\[intro_maps\]](#intro_maps){reference-type="ref" reference="intro_maps"}A provides a logarithmic scale population density distribution map using the data from *D4* and *D5*. The population maps were created as an interpolation of the population density at each antenna. # Collective Mobility Patterns We first performed a bulk mobility pattern analysis based on *D2* and *D3* by plotting the probability density function \(P(\Delta r)\) of the individual travel distances (or jump sizes) \(\Delta r\) in a trace of agglomerated de-identified callers over a period of two weeks, for Ivory Coast (left plot, solid black line) and Portugal (right plot, solid black line), as shown in Figure [\[fig_commuting\]](#fig_commuting){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_commuting"}A. The distributions were qualitatively similar to each other except that at the administrative level, the distributions in Ivory Coast are much more scattered than those observed in Portugal, suggesting greater regional variance. We fit the density function to a truncated power law of the form \(P(\Delta r) = (\Delta r + \Delta r_0)^{-\beta} exp(-\Delta r/\kappa)\), as described in, where \(\Delta r_0\), \(\beta\), and \(\kappa\) are the fit constants. While the two distributions had similar cutoff distance (\(\kappa_{Portugal} = 106 \pm 10\) km; \(\kappa_{Ivory} = 122 \pm 5\) km), the two countries have slightly different power law coefficients (\(\beta_{Portugal} = 1.37 \pm 0.06\); \(\beta_{Ivory} = 1.62 \pm 0.03\)). This higher coefficient in Ivory Coast indicates that the likelihood of displacement generally decays faster with distance in comparison to Portugal. We also investigated regional differences in the mobility patterns. In both cases of Ivory Coast and Portugal, we identified the first level administrative boundaries as the highest country-defined level of partitioning. For Ivory Coast these are called "régions", while in Portugal they are referred to as "districts". We partitioned the mobility data by the different level-one administrative regions and overlaid the same density functions specific for each administrative region on the same plots above. Different administrative regions are identified by different scatter marker types and colors. We observed the same truncated power law behavior across the different regions, but the Ivory Coast regions exhibited significantly greater diversity than similarly defined regions in Portugal. This would indicate that in Ivory Coast the likelihood of people migrate and commute with respect to distance is much more dependent on what part of the country they are in, as opposed to in Portugal where the different administrative regions show very little diversity from each other. Another important metric for assessing mobility patterns is the radius of gyration for the different callers, as defined by the mean squared variance of the center of mass of each user's set of catchment locations. We computed the radius of gyration using the same method described in and constructed the probability density functions in the same manner as described above; with results shown in Figure [\[fig_commuting\]](#fig_commuting){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_commuting"}B we can again observe similar qualitative behaviors. The distributions are plotted in Figure [\[fig_commuting\]](#fig_commuting){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_commuting"}B and show that the bulk mobility data from Ivory Coast adheres well to the scale-free framework proposed in. The similarity in the bulk mobility characteristics between Ivory Coast and Portugal serves to strengthen the argument that we can make valid comparisons between the two datasets, as described in the sections below. # Commuting Patterns Daily commuting patterns are a critical component of any region's mobility requirements. Displacement is defined as movement from one cell tower to another cell tower between two consecutive calls, and is a key marker for assessing mobility. To focus on daily commuting patterns, we excluded data collected during weekends, and computed the fraction of inter-call events that were accompanied by displacements in a moving 40-minute window of time for Ivory Coast and Portugal. We averaged the fraction of displacement for each 40-minute window across 45 weekdays to get a 24-hour temporal profile of the probability of displacement during a workday. The first and probably the most significant difference is the absolute difference in the probability of displacement, which can be seen in Figure [\[fig_commuting\]](#fig_commuting){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_commuting"}C. We observe that in Portugal, in a given period, people are much more mobile compared to their counterparts in Ivory Coast. Both countries exhibit a commuting pattern; there is a sharp rise in the probability of displacement around 7-9 a.m. The evening decline is not as sharp, suggesting that people leave work at different times in the evening. Significant quantitative differences between the countries can also been seen throughout the day. In Portugal, people in Lisbon and across the nation exhibited similar likelihood to commute during the busiest hours. However, a significantly higher percentage of people in Abidjan were mobile than across the nation. Additionally, while displacement levels in Abidjan and across Ivory Coast were similar during the lowest period (4-7 a.m.). Displacement for the same period is significantly higher for Portugal than for Lisbon, and is likely an indicator of more significant numbers of suburban commuters in Portugal than in Ivory Coast. Figure [\[fig_commuting\]](#fig_commuting){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_commuting"}D provides a comparison of the mean migration distances between the 2 countries for the same period. Here again, the average distance traveled is significantly less in Ivory Coast and its capital city, than in Portugal. In the country-wide data, we observe a sharp increase in the mean inter-event displacement distance near the morning peak commute (around 5-9 a.m.) in both Ivory Coast and Portugal. However, the spike in distance encountered in Lisbon during morning commute does not occur in Abidjan. This difference may be indicative of people both living and working in close proximity in Abidjan, as opposed to commuting in from outside or across the city as is often the case in developed regions with more comprehensive public transport facilities. We examined the country-specific commuting pattern more closely by looking at how the distance commuted may affect the daily behaviors. The observed distances traveled were binned (0-1 km, 1-5 km, 5-10 km, 10-20 km, and 20-50 km), and the daily temporal profile of the probability of displacement was computed for each bin for the two countries, as shown in Figure [\[fig_commuting\]](#fig_commuting){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_commuting"}E. By looking at the figures closely, we can draw many interesting and relevant insights regarding commuting. Firstly, for Ivory Coast (left plot), note that regardless of the distances commuted, the temporal profiles show a bimodal pattern: a morning peak (around 9 a.m.) as well as an evening peak (around 7 p.m.), as expected from a typical commuting pattern. Between the two peaks, there is a valley which deepens as the distances commuted increases. This also makes intuitive sense, as people who live far away from their work place are likely only going to make the long commute twice a day, and there are only rare occasions during the work day where such a migration is required. Whereas, for shorter distances traveled (such as the solid blue line or the dashed red line), this valley is less prominent. This difference likely is explained by the fact that during the day, people at work may make frequent short trips, such as to visit their clients, to replenish their inventories, etc. Comparing this pattern in Ivory Coast with that in Portugal (right plot), we observe further differences. First, while the bimodal behavior is largely preserved in Portugal, it is less prominent for shorter commuting distances (in particular, in the 0-1 km bin, as shown in the solid blue line). In fact, in bins associated with shorter displacement distances, a third peak occurs around midday (13:10 for the 0-1 km bin and 13:09 for the 1-5 km bin, respectively), which is absent in Ivory Coast and in the bins with longer distances traveled in the Portugal data. This third peak likely represents people going for lunch, and it is only observed in short-distance displacements, as it is rare for people to travel for long distances for lunch when they are at work. The absence of this feature in the Ivory Coast data can be accounted for by the fact that in Portugal, workers are required not allowed to work for more than five consecutive hours and are subsequently forced to a break for at least one hour in the middle of the workday, which gives them more chance to travel further for lunch or other reasons. # Community Structure Large networks, such as the telecommunications or transportation networks of a nation, often exhibit community structure, i.e., the organization of vertices into clusters with many edges joining vertices of the same cluster and comparatively few edges joining vertices of different clusters. Identifying the community structure in such networks has many applications, such as better placement and provisioning of services. Recently, this type of community structure analysis has been performed on landline communications in Great Britain, mobile connections in Belgium, United States, and various other countries across Europe, Asia, and Africa. While research done to investigate the impact that physical human mobility has on the space-independent community structure has been also explored in there has been a lack of similar research, especially in the developing context. Network modularity is a measure of the strength of the division of a network into clusters. Networks with high modularity have dense connections between nodes within clusters, and sparse connections between nodes in different clusters. Modularity is computed as the fraction of edges that fall within a cluster, minus the expected such fraction if the edges were distributed at random with respect to the node strength distribution. The value of modularity lies in the range \[-1 1\], and is positive if the edges within groups exceeds the number expected on the basis of chance. A rigorous definition of network modularity is: \[Q=\frac{1}{2m}\sum_{ij}\left [ A_{ij}-\frac{ k_{i}k_{j} } {2m} \right ] \delta( c_{i}, c_{j} )\] where \(A_{ij}\) is the weight of the link from \(i\) to \(j\), \(k_{i}\) is the sum of the weights from node \(i\), \(c_{i}\) is the community that node \(i\) was assigned to, \(m=\frac{1}{2}\sum_{ij} A_{ij}\), and \(\delta( c_{i}, c_{j})\) is 1 if \(c_{i}=c_{j}\) and 0 otherwise. High modularity in mobility networks may point to an efficient organization of residences, employment, and services all in close proximity, or it may point to restrictive policies or infrastructures that limit free movement across communities. We were interested in the community structure of developing nations, such as Ivory Coast, especially in comparison to more developed nations, such as Portugal. We used datasets *D2* and *D3* to build the human mobility networks and identify the community structure of antennae within the Ivory Coast and Portugal. We set nodes to the locations of each cell tower, and edges to the total number of migrations of all people that placed two consecutive calls between the two nodes within a time window of 24 hours. We tested the following Community Detection algorithms: Louvain, Le Martelot, Newman, Infomap, and a new method of community detection suggested in. We computed the modularity of community structures identified by each of these methods. The method described in provided the highest modularity, and was subsequently chosen to be used for this part of the study. Figure [\[intro_maps\]](#intro_maps){reference-type="ref" reference="intro_maps"}C graphically compares the communities identified (in color) with their first level administrative boundaries (outlined in black). An especially interesting difference in the communities identified for Ivory Coast and those identified for Portugal was the similarity between identified communities and the official administrative boundaries of the nations. We calculated 7 different clustering coefficients, each representing the qualitative similarity between the two different partitions of each region. While the communities identified for Portugal exhibited high similarity with the 20 official administrative boundaries (districts), this was not the case for the Ivory Coast's 19 official administrative boundaries (régions). As shown in Table 1, communities identified for Portugal show significantly higher similarity (as much as 28% higher clustering coefficients) to administrative boundaries, in comparison to that of the Ivory Coast. **Similarity Index** **Portugal** **Ivory Coast** **Difference** ---------------------- -------------- ----------------- ---------------- -- Wallace 0.482813 0.199134 0.283679 Adjusted Rand 0.495536 0.258351 0.237184 Jaccard 0.377999 0.184733 0.193266 Fowlkes-Mallows 0.553788 0.378296 0.175491 Melia-Heckerman 0.659385 0.515347 0.144037 Hubert 0.806411 0.707795 0.098615 Larsen 0.58273 0.525396 0.057334 Rand 0.903205 0.853898 0.049308 : [Comparison of different similarity indices to compare similarity between community partitioning (generated from network of human mobility) and the respective administrative boundaries.]{.medium} \- While this significant difference in community and official boundary alignments may be attributable to the layout of infrastructure along official boundaries, we began to question whether there might be more fundamental differences. Previous studies have shown that other factors, such as geographical features, can play an important role in how communities are formed and services are sought. However, little has been done to investigate the direct impact of culture and language on human mobility. Ivory Coast represents an especially interesting context to investigate cultural and linguistic influences on mobility within a single nation. The Ivory Coast is a nation made up of more than 60 distinct tribes, classified into 5 principle regions. The official language is French, although many of the local languages are widely used, including Baoulré, Dioula, Dan, Anyin and Cebaara Senufo, and an estimated 65 languages are spoken in the country. Intuitively, these cultural and linguistic differences are likely to influence mobility patterns in the region. However, it is also known that as regions become more urbanized, cultural ways are often blended or lost altogether. Portugal represents an interesting context for the latter, as Portuguese is the single national language of Portugal, and any tribal boundaries pre-date Roman times. Due to the vast differences seen in the network community structure to administrative-defined boundaries, our goal in the next section was to understand if tribal structure of the Ivory Coast could be the influential factor of the mobility patterns in the region. # Tribal Community Analysis Since the communities detected in Section IV exhibited low similarity to administrative boundaries, we began to investigate the impact of certain factors present in the Ivory Coast that may be attributable to such a substantial difference. Since people and their behaviors throughout a large portion of Africa are still impacted by their tribal affiliations while any tribal boundaries in Portugal predate Roman times, studying the tribal boundary impact in Ivory Coast represented a perfect example of this. We started by modifying the community detection approach to use the tribal boundaries as the Level 1 boundaries and subsequently ran a hierarchical community detection using the Louvain method in each of these Level 1 tribal partitions in order to produce the subcommunities inside different tribal regions which we will refer to as sub-tribal communities. The Louvain method provided the closest final number of partitions to the administratively defined subprefectures of the algorithms that we tested, and was thus chosen as the most appropriate for current purposes. By doing so, we were able to generate sub-tribal communities while also conserving the physical shape of each tribal region. Figure [\[fig_ic_maps\]](#fig_ic_maps){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_ic_maps"}A demonstrates this by showing the official prefecture and subprefecture boundaries (left) and the tribal and sub-tribal communities (right) that were created using this approach. The larger first level partitions (prefecture and tribal) are indicated as a single color, while the smaller secondary partitions (subprefecture and sub-tribal) are indicated as black lines within their respective first level partition. As a first measure of impact of tribes on mobility, we aggregated the mobility network between communities. Figure [\[fig_ic_maps\]](#fig_ic_maps){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_ic_maps"}B provides a plot of the mobility network with each node representing a community, and each edge colored to reflect the number of migrations between the connected nodes in the mobility network. The intra-tribal community mobility network is plotted separately from the inter-tribal community mobility network, in order to facilitate comparison. The intra-tribal network plots only those edges between communities in the same tribe. The inter-tribal network plots only edges between communities of differing tribes. This diagram provides a first insight into tribal influences on mobility. Note that the number of intra-tribal migrations (as indicated by the color coding of edges) dwarfs the number of inter-tribal migrations. Additionally, the inter-tribal migrations are largely dominated by connections to the largest city, Abidjan. ## Modelling Human Mobility Accurately modeling human interactions between regions can present many challenges; however, effectively doing so can provide a crucial piece of information to efficiently distribute resources, health services, etc. throughout a given area. The Gravity Model, whose origins trace back to Ravenstein's laws of migration, was formulated on Newton's Law of gravity, and predicts flux between a source and destination based on the populations of the source and destination, and the distance between the source and destination. More specifically, according to the gravity model, the average flux migrations from regions \(i\) to \(j\) is: \[T_{ij}=\frac{m_{i}^{\alpha}n_{j}^{\beta}}{r_{ij}^{\gamma}}\] where \(i\) and \(j\) are origin and destination locations with populations \(m_i\) and \(n_j\) respectively at a distance of \(r_{ij}\) from each other. \(\alpha\), \(\beta\), \(\gamma\) are adjustable parameters chosen to fit the data. In order to apply the model one must inherently define the appropriate spatial resolution (ie. the areas to model migrations between/within). By monitoring the resulting accuracy of the model, it is possible to gain insight on what type of partitioning of an area will most effectively allow for human mobility to be modeled. We started by investigating if the use of these sub-tribal communities would provide an advantage in modeling the mobility network of the Ivory Coast compared to an administrative (subprefecture) partitioning. We computed the Gravity model using dataset *D2*, and specifically modeled the migrations for both administrative and sub-tribal partitioning of the country, and subsequently tested the accuracy of the model from the mean average percent error (MAPE) with respect to the true network of human mobility. MAPE has been shown to be a very effective measure of error in model predictions, especially when considering population forecasting. We compute Mean Average Percent Error (MAPE) according to: \[M=\frac{100}{n} \sum_{t=1}^{n}\left | \frac{A_t-F_t}{A_t} \right |\] where \(A_t\) is the actual value, \(F_t\) is the forecasted value, and \(n\) is the number of data points. Therefore, an inaccurate model will subsequently yield a high MAPE value; whereas an accurate model will yield a much smaller MAPE value. In order to further explore the relationship between tribal and administrative boundaries we applied an alternative approach for modeling human mobility and interaction, the Radiaiton Model. The Radiation Model was recently proposed as a parameter free mobility model in which individuals move and interact based on the population density of the source and destination regions, and that of the surrounding regions. Using the Radiation Model, the average flux between two regions \(i\) and \(j\) is: \[T_{ij}=T_{i}\frac{m_{i}n_{j}} {(m_i+s_{ij})(m_i+n_j+s_{ij})}\] where \(i\) and \(j\) are origin and destination locations with populations' \(m_i\) and \(n_j\) respectively, at distance \(r_{ij}\) from each other, with \(s_{ij}\) representing the total population in the circle of radius \(r_{ij}\) centered at \(i\) (excluding the source and destination population). \(T_i\) signifies the total outgoing flux that originates from region \(i\). Figure [\[fig_admin-v-tribe\]](#fig_admin-v-tribe){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_admin-v-tribe"}A shows the normalized MAPE comparison for the sub-tribal and administrative boundaries, and demonstrates that the MAPE for Gravity Model predictions made via administrative boundaries ranged from 150% to 230% higher than that of sub-tribal communities, while the Radiation Model also yielded 20% to 50% higher MAPE values for administrative boundaries. This indicates a higher accuracy (lower MAPE) produced when sub-tribal communities were used, as opposed to administrative boundaries. This subsequently suggests that, in terms of mobility patterns of Ivory Coast, it is more efficient to model mobility on a partition that accounts for tribal, cultural, and lingual differences in groups of people, as opposed to the current administratively defined country partition. We also partitioned the mobility model predictions according to intra-tribal and inter-tribal flux in order to quantify the *strength of the connectivity of the tribes*. Quantitatively, the MAPE for the inter-tribal mobility was 11.3% higher than the MAPE of the intra-tribal mobility predictions, and supports the dominant pattern of intra-tribal migrations over inter-tribal migration which may require special consideration in terms of mobility modeling. Again, the fact that the Radiation model produces more accurate results for migrations within a single tribe compared to those between tribes suggests that the tribes themselves are playing a key role in the overall improved accuracy of the model. Figures [\[fig_admin-v-tribe\]](#fig_admin-v-tribe){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_admin-v-tribe"}B-D compare the predicted probability of migration versus the ground truth migration, for both the Gravity Model and Radiation Model. As a more direct comparison of accuracy, Figure [\[fig_admin-v-tribe\]](#fig_admin-v-tribe){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_admin-v-tribe"}E provides the error (MAPE) for the models plotted in Figures [\[fig_admin-v-tribe\]](#fig_admin-v-tribe){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_admin-v-tribe"}B-D. For the Ivory Coast, these figures show the higher accuracy (i.e., lower error) of Radiation Model for both administrative and sub-tribal communities, and it shows that using the Radiation Model with sub-tribal communities provides the highest accuracy (i.e., lowest MAPE). Figure [\[fig_admin-v-tribe\]](#fig_admin-v-tribe){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_admin-v-tribe"}D illustrates the Portuguese administrative municipality boundaries perform well for both the Radiation and Gravity Models. This may be indicative that the municipal boundaries were designed to align with cultural and social communities or that cultural and social communities have adapted to fit administrative boundaries. However, we believe a more likely explanation is the growing homogeneity of language and culture that comes with maturing industrialization and urbanization. This is reflected in the predominance of Portuguese as the national language in Portugal, compared to the more than 60 local languages spoken in Ivory Coast. There are several important implications from these findings. 1. Models of mobility, migration, and interaction that are conceptualized in mature, industrialized, and urbanized regions may not directly map to developing regions with more pronounced cultural and linguistic differences. Such models need to better account for these differences. 2. If administrative boundaries are drawn and services are placed based on models that do not accurately reflect these influencers, results could include inefficiencies, leading to inequality of services (e.g., longer or less accessible commutes), and potentially discrimination and alienation of segments of the population. 3. Techniques for assessing the strength of borders in a given regional partitioning scheme are critical to ensuring the accuracy of mobility and migration modeling, and, perhaps more importantly, to enabling sound decision-making by authorities tasked with setting effective administrative boundaries. In the following section, we propose novel techniques for quantifying the impact of a regional partition scheme on model accuracy, and for assessing the strength of borders in a given partitioning scheme. # Assessing regional affinities and border strength In previous sections, we demonstrated the issues arising from using mobility models, such as the Gravity and Radiation models, on regions where the partitioning scheme, such as Ivory Coast administrative boundaries, does not reflect the regional affinities and border strengths these models assume. We illustrated techniques to create more appropriate partitioning schemes, such as the tribal communities, and demonstrated the ability to achieve higher accuracy mobility modeling using this improved partitioning. However, it may not always be possible to simply re-draw borders. Instead, tools are needed to assess the efficacy of an existing partitioning scheme, in terms of the affinities within the identified borders and the strength of the borders. In this section, we propose two novel techniques to address the above challenge. Firstly, we present a metric to determine whether affinities exist within borders that may impact the accuracy of mobility modeling. We test our metric on the tribal and administrative boundaries used in the previous sections. Secondly, we propose a technique to assess the strength of existing borders, and we demonstrate our technique on the existing administrative borders of Portugal and Ivory Coast. Our techniques use the same mobility data used in previous sections and can be performed on any regional partitioning scheme, and thus provide valuable tools to mobility researchers and to urban planners. ## Regional affinity The accuracy of both the Gravity Model and the Radiation Model depends on the ability to accurately model, for a given time epoch, movement from any region to any other region, and lack of movement to another region. Inter-region movements are driven by opportunities and resources, which are reflected in the population of region, and constrained by distance. Intra-region affinities, such as physical proximity to home, work, family, and friends, tend to limit movement from a given region. Improperly partitioning a region to account these affinities results in over or under predicting flux, and therefore, poor model performance. We propose a metric to assess whether such affinities exist, and test that metric on the tribal and administrative boundaries used in previous sections. To compute this metric, we segregated all migrations into two categories: intra-and inter-regional migrations. Referring to Figure [\[fig_ic_maps\]](#fig_ic_maps){reference-type="ref" reference="fig_ic_maps"}A, an inter-region migration is a migration that crosses a color boundary. Likewise, an intra-region migration is a migration that does not cross a color boundary. When a model over-predicts the number of inter-region migrations, it is under-estimating the strength of the affinities within that region. We use \(S\) to denote the bias of a regional partitioning to over or under estimate flux across regional boundaries. We compute \(S\) as: \[S=\frac{ \sum_{1}^{n} \frac{R}{T} }{n}\] where \(R\) is the modeled flux, \(T\) is the true flux, and \(n\) is the total number of predictions made. In other words, \(S\) represents the average ratio of modeled to predicted fluxes in the system. Therefore, relatively high values of \(S\) indicate the model is generally *over* predicting, while lower values indicate a general *under* prediction by the model. We compute separate \(S_{inter}\) and \(S_{intra}\) values, where the \(S_{inter}\) value includes only inter-region flux and \(S_{intra}\) includes only intra-region flux. The percent difference (\(D\)) between \(S_{intra}\) and \(S_{inter}\) for all partitions provides a measure of bias. That is, the larger the value of \(D\), the stronger the bias for over estimating inter-region flux. Figure [\[model_slope\]](#model_slope){reference-type="ref" reference="model_slope"} illustrates that both the Gravity and Radiation Models exhibited the most significant over estimation of inter region flux for Ivory Coast Tribes. Recall that significant over estimation of inter region flux is a result of significant under estimation of intra region affinities. Consistent with the results of previous sections, the administrative boundaries of both Portugal and Ivory Coast demonstrate substantially less bias. Thus our metric performs well in highlighting the strong affinities (in this case tribal), which must be accounted for in the model. ## Border Strength Just as mobility may be constrained by affinities, it is similarly impacted by the strength of surrounding borders. Mobility modelling must accurately and compactly reflect borders that may be physical, such as gates or other guards, or abstract, such as lack of opportunities. In this section, we propose a novel metric for assessing the strength of borders within a region. We demonstrate our metric by computing the strengths of the administrative borders of Portugal and Ivory Coast used in previous sections. As predicted by the Gravity and Radiation Models, we show that borders surrounding the heavily populated region of Abidjan are more penetrable than borders elsewhere in the Ivory Coast. Similarly, our results show that the borders throughout the country of Portugal are much more uniform, even showing consistency with the more heavily populated Lisbon. Our metric allows us to show that while these two cities, located in two very different regions, share a higher penetrability of borders than surrounding regions, they also exhibit significant differences in the distribution of border strength. To compute our border strength metric, we start by computing the connectedness of each node (in our study, cell-tower) to the partition of which it is a member. We use \(P\) to denote the partitions to be evaluated, \(p\) as the total number of partitions, and \(P_i\) to denote the partition in which \(i\) is a member. We compute the connectedness of each node to each partition as \(C\), where: Therefore, for any given node \(i\), \(-1 \leq s_i \leq 1\), where \(s_i=0\) indicates node \(i\) is as strongly connected to at least one partition other than the partition \(p-i\) to which it is assigned. Negative values of \(s_i\) indicate node \(i\) is more strongly connected to partitions other than the partition \(P_i\) to which it is assigned, and positive values of \(s_i\) indicate node \(i\) is more strongly connected to it's assigned partition \(P_i\). We overlay the \(s_i\) values onto the corresponding map of the region and perform a linear interpolation of these values in order to assess connectedness across the borders. Figure [\[hist_border\]](#hist_border){reference-type="ref" reference="hist_border"} illustrates the evaluation of this connectedness value along the different borders of Ivory Coast and Portugal. Furthermore, calculating the mean of positive \(s_i\) values for only points that lie on the border of interest creates a generalized measure of the strength of the borders in the region (\(\overline{s_i}\)). Figures [\[hist_border\]](#hist_border){reference-type="ref" reference="hist_border"}A-[\[hist_border\]](#hist_border){reference-type="ref" reference="hist_border"}D illustrate how significantly more penetrable borders surrounding the densely populated Abidjan are in comparison to other portions of the country. This higher penetrability of borders surrounding Abidjan holds for both tribal (Figure [\[hist_border\]](#hist_border){reference-type="ref" reference="hist_border"}A) in comparison to the remainder of tribal borders (Figure [\[hist_border\]](#hist_border){reference-type="ref" reference="hist_border"}B). This effect is again prominent with the administrative border surrounding Abidjan (Figure [\[hist_border\]](#hist_border){reference-type="ref" reference="hist_border"}C) relative to the rest of the country (Figure [\[hist_border\]](#hist_border){reference-type="ref" reference="hist_border"}D). Furthermore, Figure [\[hist_border\]](#hist_border){reference-type="ref" reference="hist_border"}A illustrates the mean positive penetrability (\(\overline{s_i}\)) of 0.2847 for the borders surrounding Abidjan, versus 0.4767 for borders throughout the rest of Ivory Coast (Figure [\[hist_border\]](#hist_border){reference-type="ref" reference="hist_border"}B). Also note that penetrability in Abidjan is markedly higher than in the remainder of Ivory Coast, whereas the Lisbon borders (Figures [\[hist_border\]](#hist_border){reference-type="ref" reference="hist_border"}E-[\[hist_border\]](#hist_border){reference-type="ref" reference="hist_border"}F) are only marginally less penetrable than in the remainder of Portugal. This supports our earlier finding that mobility in Portugal is much more uniform throughout the entire country compared to the Ivorian Coast context. The distributions illustrated in Figure [\[hist_border\]](#hist_border){reference-type="ref" reference="hist_border"} also provide interesting insights into mobility in Ivory Coast and Portugal. More specifically, notice the tight clustering of border strengths for Abidjan under the Tribal partitioning (Figure [\[hist_border\]](#hist_border){reference-type="ref" reference="hist_border"}A) versus more widely distributed border strength values for the rest of Ivory Coast. This supports our early findings that Tribal boundaries play a key role in mobility throughout the country, except in highly urbanized regions such as Abidjan. # Conclusion Africa is a continent that has been shaped by human migration over tens of thousands of years. Indeed, migrations within and beyond the African borders have recently been shown as influencing all civilizations as we know them. However, until recently, there has been a dearth of data on the forms and patterns of migration within the nations of Africa. Moreover, much of the mobility research is based on theories that have emerged from highly industrialized nations and lack validation in the context of developing environments. Our study has demonstrated that many of these conceptions are not necessarily applicable in the African context. We have made these differences clear by comparing our findings in Ivory Coast to one such industrialized nation, Portugal. For example, we have shown that the probability of displacement during normal commuting hours in Portugal is often nearly double that of Ivory Coast for the same time of day. Similarly, average distances traveled by commuters in Portugal is nearly double that of commuters in Ivory Coast. While differences in the likelihood of travel and average distance travel can be attributed to quantitative differences in infrastructural support for mobility this already strongly affects the whole mobility picture leading to a number of quantitative dissimilarities. Our study shows evidence of more fundamental differences in infrastructural support for mobility, such as tribal, cultural, and lingual differences. In addition, we demonstrate that the similarity between administrative boundaries and communities detected in mobile phone data is markedly lower in Ivory Coast than in Portugal. By identifying the tribal influence on mobility in the Ivory Coast, we were able to illuminate further differences in mobility patterns. For example, we were able to show intra-tribal migrations were much more frequent than that of inter-tribal migrations over the same distance and therefore are under or overestimated by the models. Taking this into account by exploiting our tribally aligned communities for the mobility models drastically improves modeling of human mobility in Ivory Coast. We validated this higher accuracy by computing the Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) across all data points for both models, and found a 20% to 50% higher error for the models using administrative boundaries. We also validated our results by computing the distribution of migrations by distance migrated and found that by using this sub-tribal method of spatial units definition in modeling human mobility we were able to improve the accuracy of the models so drastically, that the Ivory Coast performed even better than its developed country-counterpart, Portugal. We propose novel techniques for assessing the strength of borders within a regional partitioning scheme, and for assessing the impact of inappropriate partitioning on model accuracy. Our results offer improved insights on why models developed for mature and stable regions may not translate well to developing regions, and provide tools for urban planners and data scientists to address these deficiencies. We are excited by the findings of this study and plan to further validate our findings by comparing to additional developing and developed regions.

{'timestamp': '2014-01-23T02:11:09', 'yymm': '1401', 'arxiv_id': '1401.5743', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5743'}

# Introduction Localization is a key requirement for the deployment of wireless networks in a wide range of applications. There are numerous absolute localization algorithms, such as Time of Arrival (ToA), Time Difference of Arrival (TDoA) and Received Signal Strength (RSS) which cater to anchored networks, where only the positions of a few nodes are known. Alternatively, when there are no reference anchors, then the relative positions of the nodes, up to a rotation and translation, can still be obtained using Multi-Dimensional Scaling (MDS) based solutions. Such anchorless networks arise naturally when the nodes are deployed in inaccessible locations or when anchor information is known intermittently. In both anchored or anchorless scenarios, pairwise distances are one of the key inputs for almost all localization techniques. For stationary nodes, these pairwise distances are classically obtained by measuring the propagation delays of multiple time stamp exchanges between the nodes and averaging these measurements over a time period. A step further, when the nodes are mobile, then conventionally either the nodes are considered relatively stationary within desired accuracies for the complete duration of the measurement interval (i.e.,  multiple distance measurements) or Doppler measurements are utilized. Unfortunately, Doppler measurements are not always available and the assumption on the node positional stability for large time periods is not necessarily practical. For a mobile network, the application of classical MDS-based relative positioning at every time instant yields a sequence of position matrices with arbitrary rotation, thereby providing no information on the relative velocities of the nodes. The term *relative velocities* indicates the velocity vectors of the nodes, up to a common rotation, translation and reflection. To the best of the authors' knowledge, the estimation of relative velocities for an anchorless network has not yet been investigated in literature. ## Applications Our motivation for this work is triggered by *inaccessible* mobile wireless networks, which have partial or no information of absolute coordinates and/or clock references. Such scenarios are prevalent in under-water communications, indoor positioning systems and envisioned space based satellite networks with minimal ground segment capability. A particular project of interest is Orbiting Low Frequency Antennas for Radio astronomy (OLFAR), a Dutch funded program which aims to design and develop a detailed system concept for a scalable interferometric array of more than ten identical, autonomous satellites in space (far from earth) to be used as a scientific instrument for ultra low frequency observations (\(0.3\) kHz-\(30\) MHz). Due to limitations of earth-based tracking, the OLFAR cluster will be an independent cooperative network of nodes, whose positions and velocities need to be estimated jointly. # Dynamic ranging {#sec:dynamicRanging} ## Range model Consider a cluster of \(N\) nodes in a \(P\)-dimensional Euclidean space. If the nodes are fixed, then the pairwise propagation delay at time \(t_0\) between a given node pair \((i,j)\) is defined as \[\begin{aligned} \tau_{ij} (t_0) \equiv\ \tau_{ji}(t_0) \triangleq c^{-1}d_{ij}(t_0), \end{aligned}\] where \(d_{ij}(t_0)\) is the fixed distance between the node pair at \(t_0\) and \(c\) is the speed of the electromagnetic wave in the medium. However, when the nodes are mobile, the relative distances between the nodes are a non-linear function of time (for \(P \ge 2\)), even when the nodes are in linear motion[^1]. For a small time interval \(\Delta t = t-t_0\), we consider these relative distances as a smoothly varying polynomial. The propagation delay \(\tau_{ij}(t) \equiv \tau_{ji}(t)\) between a given node pair \((i,j)\) is then (classically) an infinite Taylor series around a time instant \(t_0\) within the neighborhood \(\Delta t\). As an extension of the linear range model, we have \[\begin{aligned} \tau_{ij}(t_0 +\Delta t) \triangleq c^{-1}d_{ij}(t_0 +\Delta t) \triangleq c^{-1}d_{ij}(t), \label{eq:propagationDefinition} \end{aligned}\] where \(d_{ij}(t)\) is the distance at \(t= t_0 +\Delta t\), given by \[\begin{aligned} d_{ij}(t) &=& r_{ij} + \frac{\dr_{ij}}{1!}\Delta t + \frac{\ddr_{ij}}{2!}\Delta t^2 + \hdots, \label{eq:rangeDefinition} \end{aligned}\] where \({\ensuremath{\underline{{\mbox{\boldmath{\)\theta\(}}}}}}_{ij}=[r_{ij}, \dr_{ij},\ddr_{ij}, \hdots ] \in \mathbb{R}^{L \times 1}\) are the range parameters. The first coefficient \(r_{ij} \equiv\ d_{ij}(t_0)\) is the initial pairwise distance and the following \(L-1\) coefficients are successive derivatives of \(r_{ij}\) at \(t_0\). Without loss of generality, assuming \(t_0 =0\), we have \(t = \Delta t\) and subsequently ([\[eq:propagationDefinition\]](#eq:propagationDefinition){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:propagationDefinition"}) and ([\[eq:rangeDefinition\]](#eq:rangeDefinition){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:rangeDefinition"}) simplify to the Maclaurian series as \[\begin{aligned} \tau_{ij}(t) = c^{-1} \Big(r_{ij} + \dr_{ij}t + \frac{\ddr_{ij}}{2!}t^2 + \hdots\Big). \label{eq:rangeDefinition1} \end{aligned}\] The *unique* pairwise ranges between all the \(N\) nodes are collected in a vector \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{r}}} \in \mathbb{R}^{\bar{N} \times 1}\), where \(\bar{N}= \begin{pmatrix} N \\ 2 \end{pmatrix}\) is the number of unique pairwise baselines. Along similar lines, we can define \(\bdr \in \mathbb{R}^{\bar{N} \times 1}\), \(\bddr \in \mathbb{R}^{\bar{N} \times 1}\) and corresponding higher-order terms. The polynomial range basis is simplified further by introducing \[\begin{bmatrix} {\underline{r}}_{ij}, \dur_{ij}, \ddur_{ij}, \hdots \end{bmatrix}^T = \mbox{\rm diag}({\ensuremath{\mathbf{f}}}) ^{-1} \begin{bmatrix} r_{ij}, \dr_{ij}, \ddr_{ij}, \hdots \end{bmatrix}^T \label{eq:rangeTranslation}\] where \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{f}}}= c[1,\ 1!,\ 2!,\ \hdots]^T \in \mathbb{R}^{L \times 1}\), such that ([\[eq:rangeDefinition1\]](#eq:rangeDefinition1){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:rangeDefinition1"}) is \[\begin{aligned} \tau_{ij}(t) = c^{-1} d_{ij}(t) &\triangleq& {\underline{r}}_{ij} + \dur_{ij}t + \ddur_{ij}t^2 + \hdots \label{eq:rangeDefinition2} \end{aligned}\] Following the definition of \({\mbox{\boldmath{\)\theta\(}}}= \begin{bmatrix} {\ensuremath{\mathbf{r}}}, \bdr, \bddr, \hdots \end{bmatrix}\), we define \({\underline{\br}} \in \mathbb{R}^{\bar{N} \times 1}\), \(\bdur \in \mathbb{R}^{\bar{N} \times 1}\), \(\bddur \in \mathbb{R}^{\bar{N} \times 1}\) and similarly higher-order terms. ***Remark** : (Doppler measurements): Observe that in essence, \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{r}}}\) is the ToA at \(t_0\), the range rate \(\bdr\) is the radial velocity (as obtained from a Doppler shift) and the second order range parameter \(\bddr\) is the rate of radial velocity (as observed from a Doppler spread) between the nodes at \(t=t_0\). These range coefficients can be readily incorporated if these measurements are available.* ## Data Model We now consider a relaxed Two-Way Ranging (TWR) setup for collecting distance information as follows. Let a node pair \((i,j)\) within the network be capable of communicating with each other as shown in Figure[\[fig:figPairWise\]](#fig:figPairWise){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:figPairWise"}. The nodes communicate \(K\) messages back and forth, and the time of transmission and reception is registered independently at the respective nodes. The \(k\)th time stamp recorded at node \(i\) when communicating with node \(j\) is denoted by \(T_{ij,k}\) and similarly at node \(j\) the time stamp is \(T_{ji,k}\). The direction of the communication is indicated by \(E_{ij,k}\), where \(E_{ij,k} = +1\) for transmission from node \(i\) to node \(j\) and \(E_{ij,k} =-1\) for transmission from node \(j\) to node \(i\). Under ideal noiseless conditions, the propagation delay between the node pair at the \(k\)th time instant is \(E_{ij,k}(T_{ij,k}-T_{ji,k})\), and in conjunction with the polynomial approximation ([\[eq:rangeDefinition2\]](#eq:rangeDefinition2){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:rangeDefinition2"}), we have \[\tau_{ij,k}= {\underline{r}}_{ij} + \dur_{ij} T_{ij,k} + \ddur_{ij} T_{ij,k}^2 + \hdots = E_{ij,k}(T_{ji,k}-T_{ij,k}), \label{eq:rangeModelNoiseless}\] where \(\tau_{ij,k}\equiv\tau_{ij}(T_{ij,k})\) and without loss of generality we have replaced \(t\) with \(T_{ij,k}\). ***Remark** : (Synchronized nodes): By replacing *true* time \(t\) by \(T_{ij,k}\), we assume without loss of generality that \(T_{ij,k}\) is in the neighborhood of \(t_0=0\) and the propagation delay \(\tau_{ij}\) is measured as a function of the local time at node \(i\). Furthermore, we also assume that the clocks of these nodes are synchronized. This is a valid assumption since for an asynchronous network of mobile nodes, the clock parameters (up to first order) can be decoupled from the range parameters and estimated efficiently as shown in.* In practice, the time measurements are also corrupted with noise and hence ([\[eq:rangeModelNoiseless\]](#eq:rangeModelNoiseless){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:rangeModelNoiseless"}) is \[\begin{aligned} {\underline{r}}_{ij} + \dot{{\underline{r}}}_{ij}(T_{ij,k}+ q_{i,k}) +\ddot{{\underline{r}}}_{ij}(T_{ij,k}+ q_{i,k})^2 + \hdots\ \nonumber \\ = E_{ij,k}((T_{ji,k}+q_{j,k})-(T_{ij,k}+q_{i,k})) \label{eq:rangeModel_pairwise} \end{aligned}\] where \(q_{i,k}\sim \ensuremath{\mathcal{N}}(0, \Sigma_i),\ q_{j,k} \sim \ensuremath{\mathcal{N}}(0, \Sigma_j)\) are modelled as Gaussian i.i.d.  noise variables, plaguing the timing measurements at node \(i\) and node \(j\), respectively[^2]. Rearranging the terms, we have \[{\underline{r}}_{ij} + \dot{{\underline{r}}}_{ij}T_{ij,k} + \ddot{{\underline{r}}}_{ij}T_{ij,k}^2 + \hdots = E_{ij,k}(T_{ji,k}-T_{ij,k}) + q_{ij,k},\] where \[q_{ij,k} = E_{ij,k}(q_{j,k}-q_{i,k})-(2\ddur_{ij}T_{ij,k}q_{i,k} + \ddur_{ij}q^2_{i,k} + \hdots).\] For wireless communication with \(c= 3 \times 10^8\)m/s, note that the modified range parameters are scaled by \(c^{-1}\) ([\[eq:rangeTranslation\]](#eq:rangeTranslation){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:rangeTranslation"}). Furthermore, since the dynamic range model is proposed for a small time interval, the term \((2\ddur_{ij}T_{ij,k}q_{i,k} + \ddur_{ij}q^2_{i,k} + \hdots)\) is relatively small and subsequently the noise vector plaguing the measurements can be approximated as \(q_{ij,k} \approx E_{ij,k}(q_{j,k}-q_{i,k})\) which begets \[q_{ij,k} \sim\ \ensuremath{\mathcal{N}}(0, \Sigma_{ij}), \label{eq:noisePairwise}\] where \(\Sigma_{ij} = \Sigma_i + \Sigma_j\). Aggregating all \(K\) packets, we have \[\overbrace{\begin{bmatrix} {\mathbf 1}_K \quad {\ensuremath{\mathbf{t}}}_{ij} \quad {\ensuremath{\mathbf{t}}}^{\odot 2}_{ij} \quad \hdots\ \end{bmatrix}}^{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{A}}}_{ij}} \overbrace{\begin{bmatrix} {\underline{r}}_{ij} \\ \dot{{\underline{r}}}_{ij} \\ \ddot{{\underline{r}}}_{ij} \\ \vdots\ \end{bmatrix}}^{{\ensuremath{\underline{{\mbox{\boldmath{\(\theta\)}}}}}}_{ij}} = {\mbox{\boldmath{\(\tau\)}}}_{ij} + {\ensuremath{\mathbf{q}}}_{ij}, \label{eq:pairwiseNormal}\] where \[\begin{aligned} {\mbox{\boldmath{\(\tau\)}}}_{ij} &\triangleq& {\ensuremath{\mathbf{e}}}_{ij} \odot({\ensuremath{\mathbf{t}}}_{ji}-{\ensuremath{\mathbf{t}}}_{ij}) \in \mathbb{R}^{K \times 1} \label{eq:tauDef},\\ {\ensuremath{\mathbf{e}}}_{ij} &=& [E_{ij,1}, E_{ij,2}, \hdots, E_{ij,K}] \in \mathbb{R}^{K \times 1} \label{eq:eDef}, \\ {\ensuremath{\mathbf{t}}}_{ij} &=& [T_{ij,1}, T_{ij,2}, \hdots, T_{ij,K}] \in \mathbb{R}^{K \times 1} \label{eq:tDef}. \end{aligned}\] The known Vandermonde matrix \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{A}}}_{ij} \in \mathbb{R}^{K \times L}\) contains the measured time stamps and is invertible if \(T_{ij,k}\) is unique. The direction vector \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{e}}}_{ij}\) is encapsulated in the propagation delay \({\mbox{\boldmath{\)\tau\(}}}_{ij}\) and \({\ensuremath{\underline{{\mbox{\boldmath{\)\theta\(}}}}}}_{ij} \in \mathbb{R}^{L \times 1}\) is a vector containing the unknown range parameters. The noise vector on this linear system is \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{q}}}_{ij}=[q_{ij,1}, q_{ij,2}, \hdots\ q_{ij,K}]^T \in \mathbb{R}^{K \times 1}\), where \(q_{ij,k}\) is given by ([\[eq:noisePairwise\]](#eq:noisePairwise){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:noisePairwise"}) and the corresponding covariance matrix is \[{\mbox{\boldmath{\(\Sigma\)}}}_{ij} \triangleq\ \mathbb{E}\left[ {\ensuremath{\mathbf{q}}}_{ij}{\ensuremath{\mathbf{q}}}_{ij}^T \right] = \Sigma_{ij}{\ensuremath{\mathbf{I}}}_K\ \in \mathbb{R}^{K \times K}. \label{eq:noisePairwiseCov}\] For a network of \(N\) nodes, the normal equation ([\[eq:pairwiseNormal\]](#eq:pairwiseNormal){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:pairwiseNormal"}) can be extended to \[\overbrace{\begin{bmatrix} {\ensuremath{\mathbf{I}}}_{\bar{N}} \otimes {\mathbf 1}_K \quad {\ensuremath{\mathbf{T}}} \quad {\ensuremath{\mathbf{T}}}^{\odot 2} \quad \hdots\ \end{bmatrix}}^{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{A}}}} \overbrace{\begin{bmatrix} {\underline{\br}} \\ \bdur \\ \bddur \\ \vdots\ \end{bmatrix}}^{{\ensuremath{\underline{{\mbox{\boldmath{\(\theta\)}}}}}}} = {\mbox{\boldmath{\(\tau\)}}} + {\ensuremath{\mathbf{q}}}, \label{eq:globalNormal}\] where \[\begin{aligned} {\ensuremath{\mathbf{T}}} &=& \mbox{\rm bdiag}({\ensuremath{\mathbf{t}}}_{12}, {\ensuremath{\mathbf{t}}}_{13}, \hdots {\ensuremath{\mathbf{t}}}_{1N},\ {\ensuremath{\mathbf{t}}}_{23}, \hdots ), \in \mathbb{R}^{\bar{N}K \times \bar{N}} \\ {\mbox{\boldmath{\(\tau\)}}} &=& [{\mbox{\boldmath{\(\tau\)}}}^T_{12}, {\mbox{\boldmath{\(\tau\)}}}^T_{13}, \hdots {\mbox{\boldmath{\(\tau\)}}}^T_{1N},\ {\mbox{\boldmath{\(\tau\)}}}^T_{23}, \hdots]^T \in \mathbb{R}^{\bar{N}K \times 1} \end{aligned}\] contain the time stamp exchanges of the \(\bar{N}\) *unique* pairwise links in the network and \({\ensuremath{\underline{{\mbox{\boldmath{\)\theta\(}}}}}} \in \mathbb{R}^{\bar{N}L \times 1}\) contains the unknown range parameters for the entire network. The noise vector is \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{q}}}=[{\ensuremath{\mathbf{q}}}^T_{12}, {\ensuremath{\mathbf{q}}}^T_{13}, \hdots, {\ensuremath{\mathbf{q}}}^T_{1N},\ {\ensuremath{\mathbf{q}}}^T_{23}, \hdots]^T \in \mathbb{R}^{\bar{N}K \times 1}\) and the covariance matrix is \[\begin{aligned} {\mbox{\boldmath{\(\Sigma\)}}} &\triangleq& \mathbb{E}\left[ {\ensuremath{\mathbf{q}}}\bq^T \right] \in \mathbb{R}^{\bar{N}K \times \bar{N}K}. \label{eq:noiseCov}\end{aligned}\] ***Remark** : (Mobility of the nodes): In ([\[eq:rangeModelNoiseless\]](#eq:rangeModelNoiseless){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:rangeModelNoiseless"}), we implicity assumed that the nodes are relatively fixed during a time period of \(\delta t_k = |T_{ij,k}-T_{ji,k}|\) i.e.,  the propagation time of the message. This is a much weaker assumption compared to traditional TWR, where for a pair of fixed nodes (i.e.,  \(L=1\)), the pairwise distance is assumed to be invariant for the total measurement period \(\Delta T= |T_{ij,K}-T_{ij,1}|\). In reality, when the nodes are mobile, the distance at each \(k\)th time instant is dissimilar and this is inherently represented in the presented Dynamic ranging model.* # Dynamic ranging algorithm {#sec:dynamicRangingAlgorithm} Suppose that we have collected all the TWR timing data in \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{A}}}\) and \({\mbox{\boldmath{\)\tau\(}}}\), then in this section we find an estimate for the unknown \({\ensuremath{\underline{{\mbox{\boldmath{\)\theta\(}}}}}}\) using the model ([\[eq:globalNormal\]](#eq:globalNormal){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:globalNormal"}). Given an estimate of \({\ensuremath{\underline{{\mbox{\boldmath{\)\theta\(}}}}}}\), the range coefficients \({\mbox{\boldmath{\)\theta\(}}}= [{\ensuremath{\mathbf{r}}}, \bdr, \bddr, \hdots]\) can be directly obtained from ([\[eq:rangeTranslation\]](#eq:rangeTranslation){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:rangeTranslation"}). ## Weighted Least Squares Under the assumption that the covariance matrix \({\mbox{\boldmath{\)\Sigma\(}}}\) is known, a Weighted Least Squares (WLS) solution \(\hat{{\ensuremath{\underline{{\mbox{\boldmath{\)\theta\(}}}}}}}\) is obtained by minimizing the \(l_2\) norm of the linear system ([\[eq:globalNormal\]](#eq:globalNormal){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:globalNormal"}), leading to \[\begin{aligned} \hat{{\ensuremath{\underline{{\mbox{\boldmath{\(\theta\)}}}}}}} &=& ({\ensuremath{\mathbf{A}}}^T{\mbox{\boldmath{\(\Sigma\)}}}^{-1}{\ensuremath{\mathbf{A}}})^{-1}{\ensuremath{\mathbf{A}}}^T{\mbox{\boldmath{\(\Sigma\)}}}^{-1}{\mbox{\boldmath{\(\tau\)}}} \label{eq:globalLS} \end{aligned}\] which is a valid solution if \(K \ge L\) for each of the \(\bar{N}\) pairwise links. More generally, when \(L\) is unknown, an order recursive least squares can be employed to obtain the range coefficients for increasing values of \(L\), until we reach an optimal polynomial fit for ([\[eq:globalNormal\]](#eq:globalNormal){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:globalNormal"}). Furthermore, the Cramér Rao lower Bound (CRB) for the least squares model (\(\ref{eq:globalNormal}\)) is \[{\mbox{\boldmath{\(\Sigma\)}}}_{{\ensuremath{\underline{\theta}}}}= ({\ensuremath{\mathbf{A}}}^T{\mbox{\boldmath{\(\Sigma\)}}}^{-1}{\ensuremath{\mathbf{A}}})^{-1}\] and in combination with the range scaling ([\[eq:rangeTranslation\]](#eq:rangeTranslation){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:rangeTranslation"}), the CRB on \({\mbox{\boldmath{\)\theta\(}}}\) is given by \[{\mbox{\boldmath{\(\Sigma\)}}}_{\theta} \triangleq\ {\ensuremath{\mathbf{F}}}({\ensuremath{\mathbf{A}}}^T{\mbox{\boldmath{\(\Sigma\)}}}^{-1}{\ensuremath{\mathbf{A}}})^{-1}{\ensuremath{\mathbf{F}}} \label{eq:crb}\] where \[{\mbox{\boldmath{\(\Sigma\)}}}_{\theta}= \begin{bmatrix} {\mbox{\boldmath{\(\Sigma\)}}}_r\ \qquad\ \qquad\ \qquad \\ \qquad\ {\mbox{\boldmath{\(\Sigma\)}}}_{\dr}\ \qquad\ \qquad \\ \qquad\ \qquad\ {\mbox{\boldmath{\(\Sigma\)}}}_{\ddr} \qquad \\ \qquad\ \qquad\ \qquad\ \ddots \end{bmatrix} \label{eq:covTheta}\] is the lowest variance attained by any unbiased estimate of the range parameters \({\mbox{\boldmath{\)\theta\(}}}= [{\ensuremath{\mathbf{r}}}^T, \bdr^T, \bddr^T, \hdots]^T\) and \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{F}}}= \mbox{\rm diag}({\ensuremath{\mathbf{f}}}) \otimes {\ensuremath{\mathbf{I}}}_{\bar{N}} \in \mathbb{R}^{\bar{N}L \times \bar{N}L}\). It is worth noting that ([\[eq:globalLS\]](#eq:globalLS){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:globalLS"}) achieves this lower bound. In addition, the lower bound is unaffected by the choice of direction vector \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{e}}}_{ij},\ \forall\ i,j \le N\), since all direction vectors are encapsulated in the measurement vector \({\mbox{\boldmath{\)\tau\(}}}_{ij}\), which is not a part of the lower bound ([\[eq:crb\]](#eq:crb){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:crb"}). ***Remark** : (Direction independence): In general, observe that the proposed solution ([\[eq:globalLS\]](#eq:globalLS){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:globalLS"}) is feasible for any direction marker \(E_{ij,k}\), which is incorporated in \({\mbox{\boldmath{\)\tau\(}}}\) ([\[eq:tauDef\]](#eq:tauDef){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:tauDef"}). Hence communication between the nodes could be arbitrary or one way, and need not be necessarily bi-directional. Note that, this is not true for an asynchronous network, where two-way communication is pivotal in jointly estimating the clock and range parameters. In addition, there is no pre-requisite on the number, sequence or direction of the communication links. Thus, the proposed solution is amenable to prevalent Two Way Ranging (TWR) protocols, such as classical pairwise communication, passive listening and broadcasting.* ## Distributed Weighted Least Squares If we consider independent pairwise communication between all the nodes, with no broadcasting, then the noise in each pairwise link is independent of each other and subsequently the covariance matrix ([\[eq:noiseCov\]](#eq:noiseCov){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:noiseCov"}) simplifies to \[\begin{aligned} {\mbox{\boldmath{\(\Sigma\)}}} &=& \mbox{\rm bdiag} \left({\mbox{\boldmath{\(\Sigma\)}}}_{12}, {\mbox{\boldmath{\(\Sigma\)}}}_{13}, \hdots {\mbox{\boldmath{\(\Sigma\)}}}_{1N},\ {\mbox{\boldmath{\(\Sigma\)}}}_{23}, \hdots \right). \label{eq:noiseCov_simple}\end{aligned}\] In which case, the centralized system ([\[eq:globalNormal\]](#eq:globalNormal){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:globalNormal"}) is a cascade of pairwise linear systems ([\[eq:pairwiseNormal\]](#eq:pairwiseNormal){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:pairwiseNormal"}) and subsequently ([\[eq:globalLS\]](#eq:globalLS){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:globalLS"}) is a generalized version of solving the distributed pairwise system for estimating the pairwise range parameters \({\ensuremath{\underline{{\mbox{\boldmath{\)\theta\(}}}}}}_{ij}\) \[\begin{aligned} \hat{{\ensuremath{\underline{{\mbox{\boldmath{\(\theta\)}}}}}}}_{ij} &=& \arg \min_{{\ensuremath{\underline{{\mbox{\boldmath{\(\theta\)}}}}}}_{ij}} \; \norm{{\mbox{\boldmath{\(\Sigma\)}}}^{-1/2}_{ij}({\ensuremath{\mathbf{A}}}_{ij}{\ensuremath{\underline{{\mbox{\boldmath{\(\theta\)}}}}}}_{ij}-{\mbox{\boldmath{\(\tau\)}}}_{ij})}^2 \nonumber \\ &=& ({\ensuremath{\mathbf{A}}}_{ij}^T{\mbox{\boldmath{\(\Sigma\)}}}_{ij}^{-1}{\ensuremath{\mathbf{A}}}_{ij})^{-1}{\ensuremath{\mathbf{A}}}_{ij}^T{\mbox{\boldmath{\(\Sigma\)}}}^{-1}_{ij}{\mbox{\boldmath{\(\tau\)}}}_{ij} \label{eq:pairwiseLS} \end{aligned}\] which, similar to ([\[eq:globalLS\]](#eq:globalLS){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:globalLS"}), has a valid solution for \(K \ge L\) for each pairwise link. # Distances, Positions, Velocities and Relative Kinematics {#sec:relativeKinematics} In the previous section, we estimated \({\ensuremath{\underline{{\mbox{\boldmath{\)\theta\(}}}}}}\) which contains the solution to the unknown range derivatives \({\mbox{\boldmath{\)\theta\(}}}=\begin{bmatrix}{\ensuremath{\mathbf{r}}}, \bdr, \bddr, \hdots \end{bmatrix}\). Our next motive is to use these range derivatives to estimate the positions of the mobile nodes. When the nodes are in motion, similar to the pairwise range rates, the position vector of each node is also a Taylor series in time. However, exploiting piecewise linearity, we assume that the nodes are in linear motion with no acceleration, which is valid for a sufficiently small measurement period. (Note that despite this assumption, the pairwise distance is still non-linear.) ## Linear motion Let the position of \(N\ (N\ge P)\) nodes in a \(P\)-dimensional Euclidean space at the \(k\)th time instant be given by \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}_k= [{\ensuremath{\mathbf{x}}}_{1,k},{\ensuremath{\mathbf{x}}}_{2,k}, \hdots\ {\ensuremath{\mathbf{x}}}_{N,k}] \in \mathbb{R}^{P \times N}\), where \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{x}}}_{i,k}\in \mathbb{R}^{P \times 1}\) is the position vector of the \(i\)th node at the \(k\)th message exchange. Furthermore, at time instant \(t_0\), the \(i\)th node has velocity \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{y}}}_i \in \mathbb{R}^{P \times 1}\) and all such velocities are collected in \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{Y}}}= [{\ensuremath{\mathbf{y}}}_1,{\ensuremath{\mathbf{y}}}_2, \hdots\ {\ensuremath{\mathbf{y}}}_N] \in \mathbb{R}^{P \times N}\). Then, under a linear motion assumption, we have \[\begin{aligned} \frac{\ensuremath{d} {\ensuremath{\mathbf{y}}}_i}{\ensuremath{d} t} = \mbf{0}_P\ \quad \forall\ i \le N. \label{eq:constantVelocity} \end{aligned}\] Now, let \(\Delta t_k = t_k-t_0\) where for the sake of notational convenience and without loss of generality, we assume \(t_k= T_{ij,k}\ \forall\ k\), then the position matrix at the \(k\)th time instant is \[{\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}_k =\ {\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}} + \Delta t_k{\ensuremath{\mathbf{Y}}} \label{eq:absoluteLinearModel}\] where \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}\triangleq {\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}_0 = \begin{bmatrix}{\ensuremath{\mathbf{x}}}_1,{\ensuremath{\mathbf{x}}}_2, \hdots\, {\ensuremath{\mathbf{x}}}_N \end{bmatrix}\) is the initial position matrix at time instant \(t_0\) and \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}_k\) only depends on the initial Position and Velocity (PV) of the nodes. ## Range derivatives {#sec:linearMotion} To estimate the position matrix \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}_k\), we begin by stating explicit expressions for the range derivatives \(\begin{bmatrix}{\ensuremath{\mathbf{r}}}, \bdr, \bddr, \hdots \end{bmatrix}\) in terms of \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}},{\ensuremath{\mathbf{Y}}}\) under linear velocity assumption. Although these range parameters can be estimated up to the \((L-1)\)th order efficiently (as demonstrated in Section [3](#sec:dynamicRangingAlgorithm){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:dynamicRangingAlgorithm"}), in the rest of this article we utilize the information only up to \(L=3\). Rearranging the equations for \(r_{ij},\dr_{ij},\ddr_{ij}\), from \((\ref{subeq:range})\) we obtain Extending the above equations for all \(N\) nodes, defining \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{g}}}_{xx}=\mbox{\rm diag}({\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}^T{\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}) \in \mathbb{R}^{N \times 1}, {\ensuremath{\mathbf{g}}}_{xy}=\mbox{\rm diag}({\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}^T{\ensuremath{\mathbf{Y}}}) \in \mathbb{R}^{N \times 1}\) and \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{g}}}_{yy}=\mbox{\rm diag}({\ensuremath{\mathbf{Y}}}^T{\ensuremath{\mathbf{Y}}}) \in \mathbb{R}^{N \times 1}\), we have where the square matrices \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{R}}} = [r_{ij}]\in \mathbb{R_+}^{N \times N}\), \(\dot{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{R}}}} = [\dr_{ij}] \in \mathbb{R}^{N \times N}\) and \(\ddot{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{R}}}} = [\ddr_{ij}]\in \mathbb{R_+}^{N \times N}\) contain the initial pairwise ranges, range rates and rates of range rates, respectively. It is worth noting that \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{R}}}\) and \(\ddot{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{R}}}}\) are Euclidean Distance Matrices (EDM)s, however, \(\dot{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{R}}}}\) although symmetric, may contain both positive and negative values and is thus not an EDM. It is evident from ([\[subeq:range2\]](#subeq:range2){reference-type="ref" reference="subeq:range2"}) that without apriori knowledge of a few known PV, estimating the PVs of the network is an ill-posed problem and hence, we look to find solutions for the relative PV. Applying the centering matrix \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{P}}}= {\ensuremath{\mathbf{I}}}_N-N^{-1}{\mathbf 1}_N{\mathbf 1}_N^T \quad \in \mathbb{R}^{N \times N}\) on ([\[subeq:range2\]](#subeq:range2){reference-type="ref" reference="subeq:range2"}) and exploiting the property \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{P}}}{\mathbf 1}_{N} = \mbf{0}_N\), we have where we for the sake of convenience, we have introduced The equations ([\[eq:range3\]](#eq:range3){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:range3"}) and ([\[eq:ddrange3\]](#eq:ddrange3){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:ddrange3"}) can now be used to estimate the initial relative positions and relative velocities of the nodes, via MDS. However, prior to applying MDS we first present definitions for the relative PVs. ## Relative framework We define the relative PV vectors as an affine transformation of the corresponding absolute PV (\({\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}_k, {\ensuremath{\mathbf{Y}}}\)) i.e.,  \[\begin{aligned} {\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}_k &=& {\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}_{x,k}\ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}}}_k + {\ensuremath{\mathbf{h}}}_{x,k}{\mathbf 1}^T_N, \label{eq:absPos} \\ {\ensuremath{\mathbf{Y}}} &=& {\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}_{y}\ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{Y}}}}} + {\ensuremath{\mathbf{h}}}_{y}{\mathbf 1}^T_N, \label{eq:absVel} \end{aligned}\] where \(\ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}}}_k\) is the relative position matrix of the nodes at \(t_k\) up to a rotation \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}_{x,k} \in \mathbb{R}^{P \times P}\) and translation \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{h}}}_{x,k} \in \mathbb{R}^{P \times 1}\). Along similar lines, we define relative velocity as \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}_y\ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{Y}}}}}_k\) and relative velocity up to a rotation as \(\ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{Y}}}}}\), where \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}_y \in \mathbb{R}^{P \times P}\) is an unknown rotation matrix. The relative velocity of the nodes \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}_y\ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{Y}}}}}\) is relative to the group velocity of the network, which is \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{h}}}_y \in \mathbb{R}^{P \times 1}\). Under a linear velocity assumption ([\[eq:constantVelocity\]](#eq:constantVelocity){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:constantVelocity"}), the group velocity is the rate at which the relative translation vector varies with time i.e.,  \[{\ensuremath{\mathbf{h}}}_y = \Delta t_k^{-1} ({\ensuremath{\mathbf{h}}}_{x,k}-{\ensuremath{\mathbf{h}}}_{x,0}). \label{eq:groupVelocity}\] Furthermore, the rotation matrices \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}_{x,k},{\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}_y\) are orthogonal i.e.,  \[{\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}^T_{x,k}{\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}_{x,k}=\ {\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}^T_y{\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}_y=\ {\ensuremath{\mathbf{I}}}_p \quad \forall\ 1 \le k \le K \label{eq:rotationMatrixProperty}.\] Now, substituting ([\[eq:absPos\]](#eq:absPos){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:absPos"}) and ([\[eq:absVel\]](#eq:absVel){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:absVel"}) in ([\[eq:absoluteLinearModel\]](#eq:absoluteLinearModel){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:absoluteLinearModel"}), and using the property ([\[eq:groupVelocity\]](#eq:groupVelocity){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:groupVelocity"}) we have \[\begin{aligned} {\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}_{x,k}\ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}}}_k &=& {\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}_{x,0}\ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}}} + \Delta t_k{\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}_y\ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{Y}}}}}, \label{eq:relativePositionk_} \end{aligned}\] where for the sake of notational simplicity, we use \(\ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}}}\triangleq\ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}}}_0\) to denote the relative position matrix at \(t_0\). Now observe that the translation vectors \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{h}}}_{x,0}, {\ensuremath{\mathbf{h}}}_{y}\) are unidentifiable from observations ([\[subeq:range3\]](#subeq:range3){reference-type="ref" reference="subeq:range3"}). Subsequently, we shall also see in the following section, that the solution to the relative PVs are independent of these translation vector and hence without loss of generality can be considered to be \(\mbf{0}_P\) for notational simplicity. Secondly, in order to have a meaningful interpretation of the relative position at the \(k\)th time instant ([\[eq:relativePositionk\_\]](#eq:relativePositionk_){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:relativePositionk_"}), we must choose a reference coordinate system e.g.,  \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}_{x,0}={\ensuremath{\mathbf{I}}}\). To this end, without loss of generality and for notational simplicity, we have the following assumptions which simplifies ([\[eq:relativePositionk\_\]](#eq:relativePositionk_){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:relativePositionk_"}) to \[{\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}_k =\ \ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}}} + \Delta t_k{\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}_y\ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{Y}}}}}, \label{eq:relativePositionk}\] where \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}_k\) is the position of the nodes at the \(k\)th time instant up to a translation, under the assumption ([\[eq:notionalAssumption\]](#eq:notionalAssumption){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:notionalAssumption"}). More significantly, observe that the relative position at each \(k\)th time instant is only dependent on the relative PV and \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}_{y}\). Hence in the following sections, our aim is to estimate \(\ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}}},\ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{Y}}}}}\) and \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}_y\), using the range parameters (\({\ensuremath{\mathbf{R}}}, \dot{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{R}}}}, \ddot{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{R}}}}\)) defined in ([\[subeq:range4\]](#subeq:range4){reference-type="ref" reference="subeq:range4"}) and estimated in Section [3](#sec:dynamicRangingAlgorithm){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:dynamicRangingAlgorithm"}. ## Relative kinematic matrices Substituting the expression for absolute PV from ([\[eq:absPos\]](#eq:absPos){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:absPos"}) and ([\[eq:absVel\]](#eq:absVel){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:absVel"}) respectively in ([\[subeq:range3\]](#subeq:range3){reference-type="ref" reference="subeq:range3"}), we have where we use the property ([\[eq:rotationMatrixProperty\]](#eq:rotationMatrixProperty){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:rotationMatrixProperty"}) in ([\[eq:range5\]](#eq:range5){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:range5"}) and ([\[eq:ddrange5\]](#eq:ddrange5){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:ddrange5"}), and the assumption ([\[subeq:Hx=I\]](#subeq:Hx=I){reference-type="ref" reference="subeq:Hx=I"}) in ([\[eq:drange5\]](#eq:drange5){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:drange5"}). \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{B}}}_{xx}\) and \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{B}}}_{yy}\) are Gramian matrices of the relative PVs and the expression for \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{B}}}_{xy}\) is the Lyapunov-like linear matrix equation. It is worth noting that the relative kinematic equations \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{B}}}_{xx}, {\ensuremath{\mathbf{B}}}_{xy}, {\ensuremath{\mathbf{B}}}_{yy}\) are dependent only on the relative PVs and the unique rotation matrix at time \(t_0\). For an alternative derivation of the relative kinematic matrices, refer to Appendix [10](#ap:Bderivation){reference-type="ref" reference="ap:Bderivation"}. Given an estimate of the range matrices, i.e.,  \(\widehat{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{R}}}}, \widehat{\dot{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{R}}}}}, \widehat{\ddot{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{R}}}}}\), either using ([\[eq:globalLS\]](#eq:globalLS){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:globalLS"}) or alternative methods, an estimate of the relative kinematic matrices, i.e.,  \(\widehat{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{B}}}}_{xx}, \widehat{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{B}}}}_{xy}, \widehat{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{B}}}}_{yy}\) can be readily obtained using ([\[subeq:range4\]](#subeq:range4){reference-type="ref" reference="subeq:range4"}). Following which, we aim to estimate the relative position using ([\[eq:range5\]](#eq:range5){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:range5"}), the relative velocity using ([\[eq:ddrange5\]](#eq:ddrange5){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:ddrange5"}) and the unknown velocity rotation matrix \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}_y\) using ([\[eq:drange5\]](#eq:drange5){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:drange5"}). # Algorithms {#sec:algorithms} ## Relative positions (\(\ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}}}\)) and Relative velocities (\(\ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{Y}}}}}\)) {#sec:relativePV} An estimate of the relative PV can be directly obtained by the spectral decomposition of the matrices \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{B}}}_{xx}, {\ensuremath{\mathbf{B}}}_{yy}\). Let \[\begin{aligned} \widehat{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{B}}}}_{xx} &=& {\ensuremath{\mathbf{U}}}_x{\mbox{\boldmath{\(\Lambda\)}}}_x{\ensuremath{\mathbf{U}}}_x^T, \\ \widehat{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{B}}}}_{yy} &=& {\ensuremath{\mathbf{U}}}_y{\mbox{\boldmath{\(\Lambda\)}}}_y{\ensuremath{\mathbf{U}}}_y^T, \end{aligned}\] where \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{U}}}_x,{\ensuremath{\mathbf{U}}}_y \in \mathbb{R}^{N \times N}\) contain the eigenvectors and the diagonal matrices \({\mbox{\boldmath{\)\Lambda\(}}}_x, {\mbox{\boldmath{\)\Lambda\(}}}_y \in \mathbb{R}^{N \times N}\) contain the increasingly ordered eigenvalues of the matrices \(\widehat{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{B}}}}_{xx}, \widehat{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{B}}}}_{yy}\) respectively. Then, for a \(P\)-dimensional setup, an estimate of the relative positions \(\ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}}}\) and relative velocities \(\ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{Y}}}}}\) of the nodes up to a rotation is then \[\begin{aligned} \widehat{\ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}}}} &=& \underline{{\mbox{\boldmath{\(\Lambda\)}}}}^{1/2}_x\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{U}}}}^T_x, \label{eq:relativePosition} \\ \widehat{\ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{Y}}}}}} &=& \underline{{\mbox{\boldmath{\(\Lambda\)}}}}_y^{1/2}\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{U}}}}_y^T, \label{eq:relativeVelocity} \end{aligned}\] where \(\underline{{\mbox{\boldmath{\)\Lambda\(}}}}_x,\underline{{\mbox{\boldmath{\)\Lambda\(}}}}_y \in \mathbb{R}^{P \times P}\) contain the first \(P\) nonzero eigenvalues and \(\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{U}}}}_x, \underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{U}}}}_y \in \mathbb{R}^{N \times P}\) contain the corresponding eigenvectors. Relative positioning ([\[eq:relativePosition\]](#eq:relativePosition){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:relativePosition"}) from pairwise distance measurements using MDS is a well known technique. However, our contribution is the definition and estimation of relative velocities, i.e.,  ([\[eq:absVel\]](#eq:absVel){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:absVel"}) and ([\[eq:relativeVelocity\]](#eq:relativeVelocity){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:relativeVelocity"}) respectively. ## Rotation matrix \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}_y\) {#sec:relativeRotation} The estimate of the relative velocity \(\ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{Y}}}}}\) up to an arbitrary rotation gives no information on the direction of the nodes in an anchorless scenario. Hence, it is important to estimate the relative velocities w.r.t.  the orientation of the initial positions i.e.,  \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}_y\). Substituting the estimates of \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{B}}}_{xy}, \ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}}}, \ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{Y}}}}}\) from ([\[eq:drange4\]](#eq:drange4){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:drange4"}), ([\[eq:relativePosition\]](#eq:relativePosition){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:relativePosition"}) and ([\[eq:relativeVelocity\]](#eq:relativeVelocity){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:relativeVelocity"}) respectively in ([\[eq:drange5\]](#eq:drange5){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:drange5"}), we have \[\begin{aligned} \widehat{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{B}}}}_{xy} &=& \widehat{\ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}}}}^T{\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}_{y}\widehat{\ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{Y}}}}}} + \widehat{\ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{Y}}}}}}^T{\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}^T_{y}\widehat{\ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}}}}, \label{eq:rotationModel} \end{aligned}\] where \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}_y\) is the unknown unitary matrix which can be estimated by minimizing the cost function \[\begin{aligned} \widehat{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}}_y= \arg \min_{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}_y} \Big( \norm{\widehat{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{B}}}}_{xy}-(\widehat{\ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}}}}^T{\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}_y\widehat{\ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{Y}}}}}} + \widehat{\ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{Y}}}}}}^T{\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}^T_y\widehat{\ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}}}})}^2 \Big), \label{eq:rotationCostFunction} \end{aligned}\] where \(\widehat{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}}_y\) is an estimate of \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}_y\). Now, vectorizing ([\[eq:rotationModel\]](#eq:rotationModel){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:rotationModel"}) and rearranging the terms, we have \[\begin{aligned} {\ensuremath{\mathbf{b}}}_{xy} &=& (\widehat{\ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{Y}}}}}}^T \otimes \widehat{\ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}}}}^T)\ \text{vec}({\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}_y) +(\widehat{\ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}}}}^T \otimes \widehat{\ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{Y}}}}}}^T)\ \text{vec}({\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}^T_y) \nonumber\\ &=& ({\ensuremath{\mathbf{I}}}_{N^2} + {\ensuremath{\mathbf{J}}})(\widehat{\ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{Y}}}}}}^T \otimes \widehat{\ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}}}}^T)\ \text{vec}({\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}_y) \nonumber \\ &=& {\ensuremath{\mathbf{G}}}\text{vec}({\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}_y), \end{aligned}\] where \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{b}}}_{xy}= \text{vec}(\widehat{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{B}}}}_{xy})\) is a vector of the known measurement matrix \(\widehat{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{B}}}}_{xy}\) from ([\[eq:drange3\]](#eq:drange3){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:drange3"}) and \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{J}}} \in \mathbb{R}^{N^2 \times N^2}\) is an orthogonal permutation matrix such that \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{J}}}\text{vec}({\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}_y) = \text{vec}({\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}_y^T)\). The unknown unitary matrix \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}_{xy}\) can then be obtained by reformulating ([\[eq:rotationCostFunction\]](#eq:rotationCostFunction){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:rotationCostFunction"}) and solving \[\begin{aligned} \widehat{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}}_y =\ \mbox{\rm arg}\min_{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}_y}\ \norm{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{G}}}\text{vec}({\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}_y)-{\ensuremath{\mathbf{b}}}_{xy}} ^2=\ ({\ensuremath{\mathbf{G}}}^T{\ensuremath{\mathbf{G}}})^{-1}{\ensuremath{\mathbf{G}}}{\ensuremath{\mathbf{b}}}_{xy} \label{eq:vecHy}, \end{aligned}\] which has a feasible solution for \(N \ge P\). The proposed solution does not exploit the orthogonailty property of the unknown rotation matrix \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}_y\). Hence, more optimal solutions are feasible by solving the constrained cost function \[\widehat{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}}_y = \mbox{\rm arg}\min_{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}_y}\ \norm{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{G}}}\text{vec}({\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}_y)-{\ensuremath{\mathbf{b}}}_{xy}} ^2\;\;\text{s.t}\quad {\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}_y^T{\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}_y= {\ensuremath{\mathbf{I}}}_P.\] # Relative position at time instant \(k\) We now briefly summarize the steps to find the relative position at discrete time instances using the time stamp measurements discussed in Section [2](#sec:dynamicRanging){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:dynamicRanging"}. ## Dynamic MDS Given the noisy time stamps \(\widehat{T}_{ij,k}= T_{ij,k} + q_{i,k}, \forall\ (i,j)\) node pairs in the network and \(\forall\ 1\le k\le K\) time instances, the relative position of the nodes at the \(k\)th time instance can be estimated as follows. - Solve for an estimate of the Range derivatives \(\widehat{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{R}}}}, \widehat{\dot{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{R}}}}}, \widehat{\ddot{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{R}}}}}\) using Dynamic ranging ([\[eq:globalLS\]](#eq:globalLS){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:globalLS"}). - Using these estimated range derivatives, construct the relative kinematic matrices \(\widehat{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{B}}}}_{xx}, \widehat{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{B}}}}_{xy}, \widehat{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{B}}}}_{yy}\) defined in ([\[eq:range4\]](#eq:range4){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:range4"}). - Obtain an estimate of the relative PV and unitary matrix from ([\[eq:absPos\]](#eq:absPos){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:absPos"}), ([\[eq:absVel\]](#eq:absVel){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:absVel"}) and ([\[eq:vecHy\]](#eq:vecHy){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:vecHy"}) respectively. Then, using ([\[eq:relativePositionk\]](#eq:relativePositionk){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:relativePositionk"}) and defining \(\Delta \hat{t}_k= \widehat{T}_{ij,k}-\widehat{T}_{ij,0}\), the relative position at the \(k\)th time instant is \[\widehat{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}}_{k,dr} =\ \widehat{\ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}}}} + \Delta \hat{t}_k \widehat{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}}_y\widehat{\ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{Y}}}}}}.\] ## Classical MDS Alternatively, the relative positions of the nodes can also be estimated using Classical MDS (CMDS). Let \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{D}}}_k \triangleq\ c[\tau_{ij,k}] \in \mathbb{R}^{N \times N}\) be the EDM at each discrete time instant \(k\) where \(\tau_{ij}= T_{ij,k}-T_{ji,k}\) and \(\widehat{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{D}}}}_k \triangleq\ c[\tau_{ij,k}+ q_{ij,k}]\) be the corresponding noisy estimate where \(q_{ij,k}\) is the noise plaguing the measurements as shown in ([\[eq:noisePairwise\]](#eq:noisePairwise){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:noisePairwise"}). Let \(-0.5{\ensuremath{\mathbf{P}}}(\widehat{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{D}}}}^{\odot 2}_k){\ensuremath{\mathbf{P}}} = \bar{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{U}}}}_k\bar{{\mbox{\boldmath{\)\Lambda\(}}}}_k\bar{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{U}}}}_k^T\) be an eigenvalue decomposition, then the solution to the relative position is \[\widehat{\ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}}}}_{k,cmds}= \bar{\underline{\Lambda}}_k^{1/2}\bar{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{U}}}}}_k^T\] where \(\bar{\underline{\Lambda}}_k \in \mathbb{R}^{P\times P}\) contain the first \(P\) nonzero eigenvalues and \(\bar{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{U}}}}}_k \in \mathbb{R}^{N\times P}\) the corresponding eigenvectors. Note that the relative position estimate using CMDS i.e.,  \(\widehat{\ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}}}}_{k,cmds}\) is up to an arbitrary rotation and translation, where as \(\widehat{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}}_{k,dr}\) yields the relative position of the nodes up to a translation alone. # Simulations {#sec:simulations} Simulations are conducted to evaluate the performance of the proposed solutions. We consider a cluster of \(N=10\) nodes in \(P=2\) dimensions, whose coordinates \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}\) and velocities \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{Y}}}\) are arbitrarily chosen as \[\begin{aligned} {\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}} &=& \begin{bmatrix} -382& 735& 959& 630& 800\\ 9& 7& 727& 366& -858 \end{bmatrix}, \nonumber \\ {\ensuremath{\mathbf{Y}}} &=& \begin{bmatrix} -6& 8& -1& -10& 3 \\ 8& -9& -7& -2& -8 \end{bmatrix}. \nonumber \label{eq:xyValues} \end{aligned}\] Without loss of generality, we assume that all nodes employ one-way communication, i.e.,  \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{e}}}_{ij} = {\mathbf 1}_K, \forall\ i,j \le N\). Furthermore, all nodes communicate with each other within the same time interval \(\Delta T = [T_{ij,1}, T_{ij,K}] = [-3, 3]\) seconds and the transmit time markers are chosen to be linearly spaced within this interval. We consider a classical pairwise communication scenario, where all the pairwise communications are independent of each other and thus \({\mbox{\boldmath{\)\Sigma\(}}}=\sigma^2{\ensuremath{\mathbf{I}}}_{\bar{N}K}\). The metric used to evaluate the performance of the range parameters is the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), given by RMSE\(({\ensuremath{\mathbf{z}}})= \sqrt{N^{-1}_{exp} \sum^{N_{exp}}_{n=1}\norm{\hat{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{z}}}}(n)-{\ensuremath{\mathbf{z}}}}^2}\), where \(\hat{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{z}}}}(n)\) is the \(n\)th estimate of the unknown vector \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{z}}} \in \mathbb{R}^{\bar{N} \times 1}\) during \(N_{exp}=1000\) Monte Carlo runs. To qualify these estimates, the square Root of the Cramér Rao Bound (RCRB) is plotted along with the respective RMSE. We also use the same metric for evaluating the rotation \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{h}}}_{xy}=\text{vec}({\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}_{xy})\). However, since the relative PVs (\(\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}}\), \(\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{Y}}}}\)) and \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}_k\) are known only up to an arbitrary rotation, we define the RMSE for these matrices as RMSE\(({\ensuremath{\mathbf{Z}}})= \sqrt{N^{-1}_{exp} \sum^{N_{exp}}_{n=1}\norm{\text{vec}({\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}\widehat{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{Z}}}}(n)-{\ensuremath{\mathbf{Z}}}{\ensuremath{\mathbf{P}}})}^2}\), where \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{P}}}\) is the centering matrix and \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}\) is the optimal Procrustes rotation, given the matrix \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{Z}}}\) and the corresponding estimate \(\widehat{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{Z}}}}(n)\) of the \(n\)th Monte Carlo run. See Appendix [11](#ap:procrustes){reference-type="ref" reference="ap:procrustes"}. For the relative PV the Cramér Rao bounds are derived (Appendix [12](#ap:crbPV){reference-type="ref" reference="ap:crbPV"}) and the corresponding RCRBs are plotted along with the RMSEs. ## Varying Number of communications (\(K\)) The dynamic ranging algorithm ([\[eq:globalLS\]](#eq:globalLS){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:globalLS"}) is implemented for \(L=4\), where the number of communications \(K\) is varied from \(10\) to \(100\). The noise on the propagation delays is \(\sigma=0.1\) meters, which is typical in classical TWR or in conventional anchored MDS-based velocity estimation using Doppler measurements. Figure [\[fig:ranges\]](#fig:ranges){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:ranges"} shows the RMSE of the first \(3\) range coefficients (which are relevant for estimating the relative velocities) achieving the RCRB asymptotically. The PV estimates are obtained using these range coefficients via ([\[eq:relativePosition\]](#eq:relativePosition){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:relativePosition"}), ([\[eq:relativeVelocity\]](#eq:relativeVelocity){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:relativeVelocity"}) and the corresponding RMSEs are plotted in Figure [\[fig:pv\]](#fig:pv){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:pv"}, along with respective RCRBs. Furthermore, the RMSEs of the relative rotation matrix \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}_{xy}\) estimate ([\[eq:vecHy\]](#eq:vecHy){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:vecHy"}) is shown in Figure [\[fig:hxy\]](#fig:hxy){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:hxy"}, where the relative position and velocity estimates are used. ## Varying noise on time measurements (\(\sigma\)) A second experiment is carried out by varying \(\sigma\) in the range \([-10, 0]\) dB meters for a fixed number of communications \(K=100\). The RMSEs of the range coefficients obtained via the dynamic ranging algorithm ([\[eq:globalLS\]](#eq:globalLS){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:globalLS"}) are plotted in Figure [\[fig:ranges_snr\]](#fig:ranges_snr){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:ranges_snr"}, which achieve the RCRB asymptotically. The RMSEs on the relative PV are shown in Figure [\[fig:pv_snr\]](#fig:pv_snr){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:pv_snr"}, and the RMSE of the relative rotation matrix is presented in Figure [\[fig:hxy_snr\]](#fig:hxy_snr){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:hxy_snr"}, in addition to the corresponding RCRBs. To the best of the our knowledge, given the novelty of the data model and the corresponding solutions, there are no other relative velocity estimators available for comparison. ## Relative position error over time Figure [\[fig:Xrk\]](#fig:Xrk){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:Xrk"} shows the RMS plots for \(\ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}}}_{k,\text{cmds}}\) and \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}_{k,\text{dr}}\) for a time duration \(\Delta T= [-3,3]\) with Gaussian noise of \(\sigma=0.1\) meters on the distance measurements. The \(\ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}}}_{k,\text{cmds}}\) estimate steadily achieves a constant RMSE, which is expected since CMDS is independently applied at each \(k\)th time instant, to estimate the relative positions of the nodes. On the contrary, the relative position estimation via dynamic ranging betters this estimate around \(t_0\), where the improvement of up to a factor \(\sqrt{K}\) is primarily due to averaging over \(K\) measurements. However, the error estimate of \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}_{k,\text{dr}}\) increases as we move away from \(t_0\), which is typical of Taylor series approximation. In addition, the poor performance of the Classical MDS based algorithm for relative velocity estimate (see Figure ([\[fig:pv\]](#fig:pv){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:pv"}), Figure ([\[fig:pv_snr\]](#fig:pv_snr){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:pv_snr"})) also hampers the solution for \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}_{k,dr}\). An improved estimate for relative velocity estimation is feasible, which will be addressed in future work. # Conclusions A novel framework is proposed to estimate the relative positions up to a rotation for an *anchorless network of mobile nodes* without the use of Doppler measurements. The proposed least squares based dynamic ranging algorithm employs a classical Taylor series based approximation, which extracts pairwise distance derivatives at a given time instant efficiently. Under a linear velocity assumption, we show that the time-varying relative positions can be estimated from the derivatives of the pairwise distances. The initial relative positions, relative velocities and a unique rotation matrix are sufficient to describe the relative motion of the nodes during a small time interval. Subsequently, closed form MDS-based solutions are presented to jointly estimate the relative positions and relative velocities of the nodes. In addition, the unique rotation matrix which relates the direction of the relative motion w.r.t.  the relative position is also estimated via least squares. The Cramér Rao bounds are also derived for the range parameters, and the relative PV and simulations are conducted to verify and analyze the performance of the proposed least squares estimators. The presented solutions are suited for autonomous networks with minimal a priori knowledge, where the positions and velocities need to be estimated at *cold start*. In practice, over longer durations, the estimated parameters can be readily extended to both relative and absolute tracking, which is beyond the scope of this article and will be addressed in a follow-up work. # Distance Non-linearity {#ap:rangeDerivation} Consider an arbitrary pair of mobile nodes with time-varying positions \(\{\bar{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{x}}}}_i(t), \bar{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{x}}}}_j(t)\}\) and constant velocities \(\{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{y}}}_i, {\ensuremath{\mathbf{y}}}_j\}\). In addition, we define the position of the nodes at \(t=t_0\) as \(\{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{x}}}_i, {\ensuremath{\mathbf{x}}}_j\}\). To show that the time-varying \(d_{ij}(t)\) is an infinitely differentiable function we derive the first few derivatives of \(d_{ij}(t)\) w.r.t.  time. By definition, the initial pairwise distance between the nodes is the Euclidean norm \[\begin{aligned} r_{ij}\triangleq\ d_{ij}(t_0) &=& \norm{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{x}}}_{i}-{\ensuremath{\mathbf{x}}}_{j}} \label{eq:rangeL0} \end{aligned}\] ### First order \(\dr_{ij}\) From ([\[eq:rangeL0\]](#eq:rangeL0){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:rangeL0"}), we can compute the first-order range parameter as \[\begin{aligned} \dr_{ij} &=& \frac{\ensuremath{d}\ }{\ensuremath{d} t}d_{ij}(t) \nonumber\\ &=& \frac{1}{2r_{ij}} \frac{\ensuremath{d} }{\ensuremath{d} t} \Big((\bar{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{x}}}}_i(t)-\bar{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{x}}}}_j(t))^T(\bar{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{x}}}}_i(t)-\bar{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{x}}}}_j(t)) \Big) \nonumber \\ &=& \frac{1}{r_{ij}} \Big({\ensuremath{\mathbf{y}}}_i^T{\ensuremath{\mathbf{x}}}_i + {\ensuremath{\mathbf{y}}}_j^T{\ensuremath{\mathbf{x}}}_j-{\ensuremath{\mathbf{y}}}_i^T{\ensuremath{\mathbf{x}}}_j-{\ensuremath{\mathbf{y}}}_j^T{\ensuremath{\mathbf{x}}}_i \Big) \nonumber \\ &=& r^{-1}_{ij} ({\ensuremath{\mathbf{y}}}_i-{\ensuremath{\mathbf{y}}}_j)^T({\ensuremath{\mathbf{x}}}_i-{\ensuremath{\mathbf{x}}}_j) \label{eq:rangeL1} \end{aligned}\] ### Second order \(\ddr_{ij}\) Similarly, under the assumption of constant velocities, the second-order range parameter using ([\[eq:rangeL0\]](#eq:rangeL0){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:rangeL0"}) is \[\begin{aligned} \ddr_{ij} &=& \frac{\ensuremath{d^2}}{\ensuremath{d} t^2}d_{ij}(t) \nonumber \\ &=&-r_{ij}^{-2}\dr_{ij} \Big(({\ensuremath{\mathbf{y}}}_i-{\ensuremath{\mathbf{y}}}_j)^T({\ensuremath{\mathbf{x}}}_i-{\ensuremath{\mathbf{x}}}_j)\Big) \nonumber \\ & & + r_{ij}^{-1} \frac{\ensuremath{d} }{\ensuremath{d} t}\Big(({\ensuremath{\mathbf{y}}}_i-{\ensuremath{\mathbf{y}}}_j)^T(\bar{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{x}}}}_i(t)-\bar{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{x}}}}_j(t))\Big) \nonumber \\ &=&-r_{ij}^{-1}\dr^2_{ij} + r_{ij}^{-1} ({\ensuremath{\mathbf{y}}}_i-{\ensuremath{\mathbf{y}}}_j)^T({\ensuremath{\mathbf{y}}}_i-{\ensuremath{\mathbf{y}}}_j) \nonumber \\ &=& r^{-1}_{ij} \Big(\norm{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{y}}}_i-{\ensuremath{\mathbf{y}}}_j}^2- \dr^2_{ij}\Big) \label{eq:rangeL2} \end{aligned}\] ### Third order \(\dddr_{ij}\) The third-order derivative of the range parameter under linear motion ([\[eq:rangeL0\]](#eq:rangeL0){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:rangeL0"}) yields \[\begin{aligned} \dddr_{ij} &=& \frac{\ensuremath{d^3}}{\ensuremath{d} t^3}d_{ij}(t) \nonumber \\ &=&-r_{ij}^{-2}\dr_{ij} (\norm{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{y}}}_i-{\ensuremath{\mathbf{y}}}_j}^2-\dr^2_{ij})-r^{-1}_{ij}\frac{\ensuremath{d}^2 }{\ensuremath{d} t^2}(d^2_{ij}(t))\nonumber \\ &=&-r_{ij}^{-1}\dr_{ij}\ddr_{ij}-2r^{-1}_{ij}\dr_{ij}\ddr_{ij} \nonumber \\ &=&-3r^{-1}_{ij}\dr_{ij}\ddr_{ij} \label{eq:rangeL3} \end{aligned}\] The higher-order range derivatives can be derived along similar lines. # Alternative derivation for \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{B}}}_{xx},{\ensuremath{\mathbf{B}}}_{xy}\, {\ensuremath{\mathbf{B}}}_{yy}\) {#ap:Bderivation} With an abuse of notation, let \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{D}}}(t) \in \mathbb{R}^{N \times N}\) be the time-varying Euclidean Distance Matrix (EDM) for a network of \(N\) nodes in \(P\)-dimensional Euclidean space and let \[{\ensuremath{\mathbf{B}}}(t) =-0.5{\ensuremath{\mathbf{P}}}{\ensuremath{\mathbf{D}}}(t)^{\odot 2}{\ensuremath{\mathbf{P}}},\] where \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{P}}}= {\ensuremath{\mathbf{I}}}_N-N^{-1}{\mathbf 1}_N{\mathbf 1}^T_N\) is the centering matrix. Then observe that at \(t=t_0\), \[{\ensuremath{\mathbf{B}}}(t_0) \triangleq\ {\ensuremath{\mathbf{B}}}_{xx} = \ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}}}^T\ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}}}\] and the subsequent first derivative is \[\begin{aligned} {\ensuremath{\mathbf{B}}}_{xy} &\triangleq& \frac{\ensuremath{d} {\ensuremath{\mathbf{B}}}(t)}{\ensuremath{dt}}\ \triangleq\-{\ensuremath{\mathbf{P}}} \Big( {\ensuremath{\mathbf{D}}}(t) \odot \dot{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{D}}}}(t)\Big){\ensuremath{\mathbf{P}}}\Big|_{t=t_0} \nonumber \\ &=& \ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}}}^T{\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}_{xy}\ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{Y}}}}} + \ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{Y}}}}}^T{\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}^T_{xy}\ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}}}. \end{aligned}\] A step further, differentiating again w.r.t.  time and substituting \(t=t_0\) we have \[\frac{\ensuremath{d}^2 {\ensuremath{\mathbf{B}}}(t)}{\ensuremath{dt^2}}\Big|_{t=t_0} \triangleq\ {\ensuremath{\mathbf{B}}}_{yy}\triangleq\-0.5{\ensuremath{\mathbf{P}}}({\ensuremath{\mathbf{R}}}\odot\ddot{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{R}}}} + \dot{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{R}}}}^{\odot 2}){\ensuremath{\mathbf{P}}} = \ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{Y}}}}}^T\ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{Y}}}}} \label{eq:dbyy}\] where \(\dot{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{R}}}}=[\dot{r}_{ij}] \in \mathbb{R}^{N \times N}\) and \(\ddot{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{R}}}} =[\ddot{r}_{ij}]\in \mathbb{R}_+^{N \times N}\) which, perhaps not surprisingly, concur with the relations obtained in ([\[subeq:range5\]](#subeq:range5){reference-type="ref" reference="subeq:range5"}) and offer an alternative verification. Secondly, unlike the time-varying distance function \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{D}}}(t)\), which is infinitely differentiable, \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{B}}}(t)\) is a second-order function under the linear velocity assumption ([\[eq:constantVelocity\]](#eq:constantVelocity){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:constantVelocity"}). Differentiating ([\[eq:dbyy\]](#eq:dbyy){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:dbyy"}) yet again, we have \[\label{eq:dbyy_zero} \frac{\ensuremath{d^3} {\ensuremath{\mathbf{B}}}(t)}{\ensuremath{dt^3}} \Big|_{t=t_0}\ =-0.5{\ensuremath{\mathbf{P}}} ({\ensuremath{\mathbf{R}}}\odot\dddot{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{R}}}} + 3\dot{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{R}}}}\odot\ddot{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{R}}}}){\ensuremath{\mathbf{P}}}=\ \mbf{0}_{N, N},\] since generalizing ([\[eq:rangeL3\]](#eq:rangeL3){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:rangeL3"}) for all \(N\) nodes yields \[\begin{aligned} \frac{d^3 {\ensuremath{\mathbf{R}}}}{dt^3} \triangleq\ \dddot{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{R}}}} =-3{\ensuremath{\mathbf{R}}}^{-1}\odot\dot{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{R}}}}\odot\ddot{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{R}}}}.\end{aligned}\] The result ([\[eq:dbyy_zero\]](#eq:dbyy_zero){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:dbyy_zero"}) is expected, since under the constant velocity assumption \[\] # Procrustes alignment {#ap:procrustes} Let \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{Z}}}, \underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{Z}}}} \in \mathbb{R}^{P \times N}\) matrices which are identical up to a rotation, then there exists a rotation matrix \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}\), which minimizes the following cost function \[\min_{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}}\ \norm{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{Z}}}-{\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{Z}}}}}\quad\ \text{s.t.}\quad {\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}^T{\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}= {\ensuremath{\mathbf{I}}}_P\] and the corresponding optimal *Procrustes rotation* is given by \[\widehat{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{H}}}}= {\ensuremath{\mathbf{V}}}_z{\ensuremath{\mathbf{U}}}^T_z\] where \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{V}}}_z, {\ensuremath{\mathbf{U}}}_z\) are obtained via the singular value decomposition of the matrix product \(\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{Z}}}}{\ensuremath{\mathbf{Z}}}^T\), i.e.,  \[{\ensuremath{\mathbf{U}}}_x{\ensuremath{\mathbf{L}}}_z{\ensuremath{\mathbf{V}}}_z= \underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{Z}}}}{\ensuremath{\mathbf{Z}}}^T.\] # Cramér Rao Bounds for \(\ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}}}, \ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{Y}}}}}\) {#ap:crbPV} ## Relative position \(\ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}}}\) The problem of estimating the unknown positions \({\mbox{\boldmath{\)\phi\(}}}_x \triangleq \text{vec}(\ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{X}}}}}) = \begin{bmatrix} {\ensuremath{\underline{\bx}}}^T_1, {\ensuremath{\underline{\bx}}}^T_2, \hdots, {\ensuremath{\underline{\bx}}}^T_{N}\end{bmatrix} ^T \in \mathbb{R}^{NP \times 1}\) from the distance measurements is formulated as \[{\ensuremath{\mathbf{a}}}_x({\mbox{\boldmath{\(\phi\)}}}_x)-{\ensuremath{\mathbf{d}}}_x= {\mbox{\boldmath{\(\eta\)}}}_x \label{eq:relXModel}\] which is obtained by vectorizing ([\[eq:range2\]](#eq:range2){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:range2"}). \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{d}}}_x= [r_{12}, r_{13},\hdots, r_{N(N-1)}] \in \mathbb{R}^{2{\ensuremath{\bar{N}}} \times 1}\) is the set of *non-zero* Euclidean distances between \(N\) points, with \({\ensuremath{\bar{N}}}=\begin{pmatrix} N \\ 2 \end{pmatrix}\). The distance vector is related to the positions by \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{a}}}({\mbox{\boldmath{\)\phi\(}}}_x) = \begin{bmatrix} a_x({\ensuremath{\underline{\bx}}}_1, {\ensuremath{\underline{\bx}}}_2), a_x ({\ensuremath{\underline{\bx}}}_1, {\ensuremath{\underline{\bx}}}_3),\hdots, a_x ({\ensuremath{\underline{\bx}}}_{N-1}, {\ensuremath{\underline{\bx}}}_{N})\end{bmatrix} ^T \in \mathbb{R}^{2{\ensuremath{\bar{N}}} \times 1}\) where, \[{\ensuremath{\mathbf{a}}}_x ({\ensuremath{\underline{\bx}}}_i, {\ensuremath{\underline{\bx}}}_j) \triangleq\ \big( {\ensuremath{\underline{\bx}}}^T_i{\ensuremath{\underline{\bx}}}_i + {\ensuremath{\underline{\bx}}}_j^T{\ensuremath{\underline{\bx}}}_j -2{\ensuremath{\underline{\bx}}}^T_i{\ensuremath{\underline{\bx}}}_j \big)^\frac{1}{2}\.\] Furthermore, the noise plaguing the distance vector is \({\mbox{\boldmath{\)\eta\(}}}_x \sim \ensuremath{\mathcal{N}}(0, {\mbox{\boldmath{\)\Sigma\(}}}_{\eta x})\), where \({\mbox{\boldmath{\)\Sigma\(}}}_{\eta x}= \text{blkdiag}({\mbox{\boldmath{\)\Sigma\(}}}_r, {\mbox{\boldmath{\)\Sigma\(}}}_r)\) and \({\mbox{\boldmath{\)\Sigma\(}}}_r\) is given by ([\[eq:covTheta\]](#eq:covTheta){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:covTheta"}). The Cramér Rao lower Bound (CRB) for any unbiased estimate of \({\mbox{\boldmath{\)\phi\(}}}_x\), is given by the inverse of the Fisher Information Matrix (FIM) i.e.,  \[{\ensuremath{\text{Tr}}} \Big( {\mathbb{E}} \left \{ (\hat{{\mbox{\boldmath{\(\phi\)}}}}_x-{\mbox{\boldmath{\(\phi\)}}}_x)(\hat{{\mbox{\boldmath{\(\phi\)}}}}_x-{\mbox{\boldmath{\(\phi\)}}}_x)^T \right \} \Big) \triangleq {\ensuremath{\text{Tr}}}({\mbox{\boldmath{\(\Sigma\)}}}_x) \ge {\ensuremath{\text{Tr}}}({\ensuremath{\mathbf{F}}}_x^{-1}) \label{eq:CRBx_}\] where \(\hat{{\mbox{\boldmath{\)\phi\(}}}}\) is an estimate of the unknown location \({\mbox{\boldmath{\)\theta\(}}}\) and \({\mbox{\boldmath{\)\Sigma\(}}}_x\) is the lowest achievable covariance. For the data model ([\[eq:relXModel\]](#eq:relXModel){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:relXModel"}), the FIM \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{F}}}_x \in \mathbb{R}^{NP \times NP}\) is \[{\ensuremath{\mathbf{F}}}_x= \begin{bmatrix} \dfrac{\partial {\ensuremath{\mathbf{a}}}_x({\mbox{\boldmath{\(\phi\)}}}_x)}{\partial {\mbox{\boldmath{\(\phi\)}}}^T_x} \end{bmatrix}^T {\mbox{\boldmath{\(\Sigma\)}}}_{\eta y}^{-1} \begin{bmatrix} \dfrac{\partial {\ensuremath{\mathbf{a}}}_x({\mbox{\boldmath{\(\phi\)}}}_x)}{\partial {\mbox{\boldmath{\(\phi\)}}}^T_x} \end{bmatrix}\label{eq:FIMx}\] where the Jacobian is of the form \[\dfrac{\partial {\ensuremath{\mathbf{a}}}_x({\mbox{\boldmath{\(\phi\)}}}_x)}{\partial {\mbox{\boldmath{\(\phi\)}}}^T_x} = \left[ \dfrac{\partial {\ensuremath{\mathbf{a}}}_x({\mbox{\boldmath{\(\phi\)}}}_x)}{\partial {\ensuremath{\underline{\bx}}}^T_1}, \dfrac{\partial {\ensuremath{\mathbf{a}}}_x({\mbox{\boldmath{\(\phi\)}}}_x)}{\partial {\ensuremath{\underline{\bx}}}^T_2},\hdots\ ,\dfrac{\partial {\ensuremath{\mathbf{a}}}_x({\mbox{\boldmath{\(\phi\)}}}_x)}{\partial {\ensuremath{\underline{\bx}}}^T_N}\right] \label{eq:Jacobian_x}\] whose \(i\)th element \(\left[\dfrac{\partial {\ensuremath{\mathbf{a}}}_x({\mbox{\boldmath{\)\phi\(}}})}{\partial {\ensuremath{\underline{\bx}}}^T_i}\right]\) is given by \[\begin{aligned} \left[\dfrac{\partial a({\ensuremath{\underline{\bx}}}_1,{\ensuremath{\underline{\bx}}}_2)^T}{\partial {\ensuremath{\underline{\bx}}}^T_i}, \dfrac{\partial a({\ensuremath{\underline{\bx}}}_1,{\ensuremath{\underline{\bx}}}_3)^T}{\partial {\ensuremath{\underline{\bx}}}^T_i}, \hdots, \dfrac{\partial a({\ensuremath{\underline{\bx}}}_{N-1},{\ensuremath{\underline{\bx}}}_{N})^T}{\partial {\ensuremath{\underline{\bx}}}^T_i} \right] \nonumber \end{aligned}\] where \(\forall 1 \le j,k \le N,\ j\ne k\), we have The FIM ([\[eq:FIMx\]](#eq:FIMx){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:FIMx"}) is rank deficient by \(3\) for a \(P=2\) dimensional scenario and is thus non-invertible. Hence, we have the achievable CRB on the relative position as \[{\ensuremath{\text{Tr}}}({\mbox{\boldmath{\(\Sigma\)}}}_x) \ge {\ensuremath{\text{Tr}}}({\ensuremath{\mathbf{F}}}_x^{\dagger}). \label{eq:CRBx}\] ## Relative velocity \(\ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{Y}}}}}\) Vectorizing ([\[eq:ddrange2\]](#eq:ddrange2){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:ddrange2"}), the relative velocity \({\mbox{\boldmath{\)\phi\(}}}_x \triangleq \text{vec}(\ensuremath{\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{Y}}}}}) = \begin{bmatrix} {\ensuremath{\underline{\by}}}^T_1, {\ensuremath{\underline{\by}}}^T_2, \hdots, {\ensuremath{\underline{\by}}}^T_{N}\end{bmatrix} ^T \in \mathbb{R}^{NP \times 1}\) estimation is modeled as \[{\ensuremath{\mathbf{a}}}_y({\mbox{\boldmath{\(\phi\)}}}_y)-{\ensuremath{\mathbf{d}}}^{\odot 2}_y= {\mbox{\boldmath{\(\eta\)}}}_y \label{eq:relYModel}\] where \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{a}}}({\mbox{\boldmath{\)\phi\(}}}_y) = \begin{bmatrix} a_y({\ensuremath{\underline{\by}}}_1, {\ensuremath{\underline{\by}}}_2), a_y({\ensuremath{\underline{\by}}}_1, {\ensuremath{\underline{\by}}}_3),\hdots, a_y ({\ensuremath{\underline{\by}}}_{N-1}, {\ensuremath{\underline{\by}}}_N)\end{bmatrix} ^T\) \(\in \mathbb{R}^{2{\ensuremath{\bar{N}}} \times 1}\) and \[{\ensuremath{\mathbf{a}}}_y ({\ensuremath{\underline{\by}}}_i, {\ensuremath{\underline{\by}}}_j) \triangleq\ {\ensuremath{\underline{\by}}}^T_i{\ensuremath{\underline{\by}}}_i + {\ensuremath{\underline{\by}}}_j^T{\ensuremath{\underline{\by}}}_j -2{\ensuremath{\underline{\by}}}^T_i{\ensuremath{\underline{\by}}}_j \.\] The distance squared vector \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{d}}}^{\odot 2}_y= \{{r}_{ij}{\ddr}_{ij} + {\dr}^{\odot 2}_{ij} \} \forall\ i,j \le N, i \ne j \in \mathbb{R}^{2{\ensuremath{\bar{N}}} \times 1}\), where \(r_{ij}, \dr_{ij}, \ddr_{ij}\) are the corresponding range estimates. The noise \({\mbox{\boldmath{\)\eta\(}}}_y= \{ \eta_{y,ij} \}\) in the data model is \[\begin{aligned} \eta_{y,ij} &=& r_{ij}q_{\ddr,ij} + \ddr_{ij}q_{r,ij} + 2\dr_{ij}q_{\dr,ij} + q_{r,ij}q_{\ddr,ij} + q_{\dr,ij}q_{\dr,ij} \nonumber \\ &\approx& r_{ij}q_{\ddr,ij} + \ddr_{ij}q_{r,ij} + 2\dr_{ij}q_{\dr,ij}, \end{aligned}\] where \(q_{r,ij}, q_{\dr,ij}, q_{\ddr,ij}\) are the noise variable plaguing the range parameters \(r_{ij}, \dr_{ij}, \ddr_{ij}\) respectively. The covariance of the noise is subsequently defined as, \[{\mbox{\boldmath{\(\Sigma\)}}}_{\eta y} \ = {\mathbb{E}} \left \{ {\mbox{\boldmath{\(\eta\)}}}_y {\mbox{\boldmath{\(\eta\)}}}^T_y \right \} \approx\ \text{blkdiag}(\underline{{\mbox{\boldmath{\(\Sigma\)}}}}_{\eta y},\underline{{\mbox{\boldmath{\(\Sigma\)}}}}_{\eta y})`\] where \[\underline{{\mbox{\boldmath{\(\Sigma\)}}}}_{\eta y} \ \approx\ \underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{R}}}}{\mbox{\boldmath{\(\Sigma\)}}}_{\ddr}\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{R}}}} + \underline{\ddot{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{R}}}}}{\mbox{\boldmath{\(\Sigma\)}}}_{r}\underline{\ddot{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{R}}}}} + 4\underline{\dot{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{R}}}}}{\mbox{\boldmath{\(\Sigma\)}}}_{\ddr}\underline{\dot{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{R}}}}}\ ,\] \(\underline{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{R}}}}= \mbox{\rm diag}({\ensuremath{\mathbf{r}}}), \underline{\dot{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{R}}}}}= \mbox{\rm diag}(\bdr),\underline{\ddot{{\ensuremath{\mathbf{R}}}}}= \mbox{\rm diag}(\bddr)\) are the range parameters and \({\mbox{\boldmath{\)\Sigma\(}}}_{r}, {\mbox{\boldmath{\)\Sigma\(}}}_{\dr},{\mbox{\boldmath{\)\Sigma\(}}}_{\ddr}\) are the corresponding covariances matrices ([\[eq:covTheta\]](#eq:covTheta){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:covTheta"}). The Cramér Rao lower Bound (CRB) for \({\mbox{\boldmath{\)\phi\(}}}_y\) is given by \[{\ensuremath{\text{Tr}}} \Big( {\mathbb{E}} \left \{ (\hat{{\mbox{\boldmath{\(\phi\)}}}}_y-{\mbox{\boldmath{\(\phi\)}}}_y)(\hat{{\mbox{\boldmath{\(\phi\)}}}}_y-{\mbox{\boldmath{\(\phi\)}}}_y)^T \right \} \Big) \triangleq {\ensuremath{\text{Tr}}}({\mbox{\boldmath{\(\Sigma\)}}}_y) \ge {\ensuremath{\text{Tr}}}({\ensuremath{\mathbf{F}}}_y^{-1}) \label{eq:CRBy_}\] where \(\hat{{\mbox{\boldmath{\)\phi\(}}}_y}\) is an estimate of the unknown velocity \({\mbox{\boldmath{\)\phi\(}}}\) and \({\mbox{\boldmath{\)\Sigma\(}}}_y\) is the lowest achievable covariance and \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{F}}}_y \in \mathbb{R}^{NP \times NP}\) is \[{\ensuremath{\mathbf{F}}}_y= \begin{bmatrix} \dfrac{\partial {\ensuremath{\mathbf{a}}}_y({\mbox{\boldmath{\(\phi\)}}}_y)}{\partial {\mbox{\boldmath{\(\phi\)}}}^T_y} \end{bmatrix}^T {\mbox{\boldmath{\(\Sigma\)}}}_{\eta y}^{-1} \begin{bmatrix} \dfrac{\partial {\ensuremath{\mathbf{a}}}_y({\mbox{\boldmath{\(\phi\)}}}_y)}{\partial {\mbox{\boldmath{\(\phi\)}}}^T_y} \end{bmatrix} \label{eq:FIMy}\] where the Jacobian is of the form \[\dfrac{\partial {\ensuremath{\mathbf{a}}}_y({\mbox{\boldmath{\(\phi\)}}}_y)}{\partial {\mbox{\boldmath{\(\phi\)}}}^T_y} = \left[ \dfrac{\partial {\ensuremath{\mathbf{a}}}_y({\mbox{\boldmath{\(\phi\)}}}_y)}{\partial {\ensuremath{\underline{\by}}}^T_1}, \dfrac{\partial {\ensuremath{\mathbf{a}}}_y({\mbox{\boldmath{\(\phi\)}}}_y)}{\partial {\ensuremath{\underline{\by}}}^T_2},\hdots\ ,\dfrac{\partial {\ensuremath{\mathbf{a}}}_y({\mbox{\boldmath{\(\phi\)}}}_y)}{\partial {\ensuremath{\underline{\by}}}^T_N}\right] \label{eq:Jacobian_x}\] whose \(i\)th element \(\left[\dfrac{\partial {\ensuremath{\mathbf{a}}}_y({\mbox{\boldmath{\)\phi\(}}})}{\partial {\ensuremath{\underline{\by}}}^T_i}\right]\) is given by \[\begin{aligned} \left[\dfrac{\partial a({\ensuremath{\underline{\by}}}_1,{\ensuremath{\underline{\by}}}_2)^T}{\partial {\ensuremath{\underline{\by}}}^T_i}, \dfrac{\partial a({\ensuremath{\underline{\by}}}_1,{\ensuremath{\underline{\by}}}_3)^T}{\partial {\ensuremath{\underline{\by}}}^T_i}, \hdots, \dfrac{\partial a({\ensuremath{\underline{\by}}}_{N-1},{\ensuremath{\underline{\by}}}_{N})^T}{\partial {\ensuremath{\underline{\by}}}^T_i} \right] \nonumber \end{aligned}\] where \(\forall 1 \le j,k \le N,\ j\ne k\), we have Similar to \({\ensuremath{\mathbf{F}}}_x\), the FIM ([\[eq:FIMy\]](#eq:FIMy){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:FIMy"}) on velocity is also rank degenerate by \(3\) for a \(P=2\) dimensional case and hence we have the CRB on the relative velocity as \[{\ensuremath{\text{Tr}}}({\mbox{\boldmath{\(\Sigma\)}}}_y) \ge {\ensuremath{\text{Tr}}}({\ensuremath{\mathbf{F}}}_y^{\dagger}). \label{eq:CRBx}\] [^1]: Later in the article, we will assume the nodes to be in constant velocities. However, here we present a generalized Taylor approximation of the time-varying pairwise distance, for any motion. [^2]: Alternatively, the noise on the time markers can also be modeled as a uniformly random variable, typically rising from quantization errors. In addition, the proposed fixed variance model can be replaced a the distance-dependent variance model, which penalizes large inter-nodal distances.

{'timestamp': '2014-01-24T02:06:12', 'yymm': '1401', 'arxiv_id': '1401.5925', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5925'}

# Introduction The minimum cut problem is a fundamental problem in graph algorithms and network design. Given a weighted undirected graph \(G=(V,E)\), a cut \(C=(S,V \setminus S)\) where \(\emptyset \subset S \subset V\), is a partition of vertices into two non-empty sets. The weight of a cut, \(w(C)\), is defined to be the sum of the edge weights crossing \(C\). The minimum cut problem is to find a cut with the minimum weight. The exact version of the problem as well as the approximate version have been studied for many years in the context of centralized models of computation, resulting in nearly linear time algorithms. Elkin and Das Sarma et al.  addressed the problem in the distributed message-passing model. The problem has trivial time complexity of \(\Theta(D)\) (unweighted diameter) in the [LOCAL]{.sans-serif} model, where the message size is unlimited. Ghaffari and Kuhn recently developed approximation algorithms for this problem in the [CONGEST]{.sans-serif} model where each message is bounded by \(\Theta(\log n)\) bits. They assume that the edges of \(G\) have integer weights from \(\{1,\ldots, n^{\Theta(1)}\}\) and treat \(G\) as an unweighted multigraph, where an edge \(e\) with weight \(w(e)\) is converted to \(w(e)\) parellel edges, while still only \(\Theta(\log n)\) bits can be sent over these parallel edges together in each round. Let \(\lambda\) be the value of the minimum cut, they give an algorithm that finds a cut of size at most \(O(\epsilon^{-1} \lambda)\) in \(O(D) + O(n^{1/2+\epsilon} \log^{3} n \log \log n \log^{*} n)\) time. Moreover, they gave an algorithm that finds a cut of size at most \((2+\epsilon)\lambda\) in \(O((D+\sqrt{n}\log^{*} n)\log^2 n \log \log n \frac{1}{\epsilon^{5}})\) time. Das Sarma et al.  showed \(\alpha\)-approximating the minimum cut requires \(\tilde{\Omega}(D+\sqrt{n})\) rounds for weighted graphs for any \(\alpha \geq 1\). Ghaffari and Kuhn extended their lower bound for unweighted multigraphs (which is equivalent to the setting where one is allowed to send messages of size \(w \cdot \Theta(\log n)\) over an edge of weight \(w\) in weighted graphs). For unweighted simple graphs, they also gave a lower bound of \(\tilde{\Omega}(D+\sqrt{n/\alpha})\). Therefore, the upper bound and lower bound provided by Ghaffari and Kuhn match up to a polylogarithmic factor. However, still no approximation algorithms exist for any approximation factor less than 2. In this paper, we give a simple algorithm that finds a minimum cut of size at most \((1+\epsilon)\lambda\) in \(\tilde{O}(D+\sqrt{n})\) time. In particular, our algorithm runs in \(O((\log^{11}n / \epsilon^{17})(D+\sqrt{n}\log^{*} n))\) rounds. Our approach uses the semi-duality between minimum cuts and tree packings as in. Karger showed that if we greedily pack enough trees, then for any minimum cut, there is a tree crossing the cut at most twice. However, it is technically not easy to utilize this fact to find minimum cuts in the distributed model. Instead, we use a lemma by Thorup, which shows that if we pack more trees then there is at least one minimum cut that is crossed by a tree exactly once. We take some ingredients from Ghaffari and Kuhn's algorithm and Thurimella's algorithm for identifying biconnected components to devise a procedure that is able to simultanously test the values of the \(n-1\) cuts induced by deleting one of the \(n-1\) edges in a tree. Note that the number of trees we have to pack is polynomial in the value of the minimum cut. Thus, we will first use the sampling lemma of Karger to obtain a sampled graph that scales the value of the minimum cut down to \(O(\log n / \epsilon^2)\). Then we only have to pack polylogarithmic number of trees. Finally, we combine the resampling procedure, the tree packing, and the procedure for testing tree-induced-cuts to find an approximate minimum cut. # Distributed Minimum Cut Approximation Let \(G\) be a connected graph with integer weights from \(\{1,\ldots,W \}\), where \(W = n^{\Theta(1)}\). We will treat \(G\) as a multigraph with uniform edge weights. Let \(\lambda\) be the weight of the minimum cut of \(G\). We show how to find such an approximate minimum cut whose weight is at most \((1+\epsilon)\lambda\). An edge \(e\) is a *bridge* if it does not exist a cycle in \(G\) passing \(e\) (or equivalently, deleting \(e\) breaks \(G\) into two connected components). Given two graph \(A\) and \(B\) with the same vertex set, \(A+B\) is the multigraph obtained by including edges in \(A\) and edges in \(B\). A *tree packing* \(\mathcal{T}\) is a multiset of spanning trees. The *load* of an edge \(e\) with respect to \(\mathcal{T}\) is the number of trees in \(\mathcal{T}\) containing \(e\). Given a tree \(T\), we say a cut is *induced* by \(T\) if such a cut is obtained by deleting an edge \(e \in T\). We will denote this cut by \(C(T,e)\). A tree packing \(\mathcal{T} = \{T_1, \ldots, T_k \}\) is *greedy* if each \(T_i\) is a minimum spanning tree with respect to the loads induced by \(\{T_1,\ldots, T_{i-1} \}\). Let \(\epsilon' = \Theta(\epsilon)\) such that \((1+\epsilon')^{3} / (1-\epsilon') = 1 + \epsilon\). We describe our algorithm in Algorithm [\[alg:approxmincut\]](#alg:approxmincut){reference-type="ref" reference="alg:approxmincut"}. The subroutine Test(\(T, \kappa\)) returns a cut whose weight is at most \((1+\epsilon') \kappa\) w.h.p. if there exists a cut in \(G\) induced by \(T\) with weight at most \(\kappa\). We show that w.h.p. the algorithm will output a cut \(C\) with \(w(C) \leq (1+\epsilon)\lambda\). In particular, consider the iteration \(i\) where \(\lambda \in [X_i, X_{i+1}]\). Let \(\lambda'\) denote the value of the minimum cut in the sampled graph \(H_i\). If \(i = 0\), then it is clear that \(\lambda' = \lambda \leq X_1 = 20\ln n / \epsilon'^2\). If \(i>0\), since we sampled with probability \(1/2^{i} = 20 \ln n / (\epsilon'^2 X_{i+1})= 10\ln n / (\epsilon'^2 X_{i}) \geq 10\ln n / (\epsilon'^2\lambda)\), we know that w.h.p. for any cut \(C\), \[(1-\epsilon') \cdot w_{G}(C) / 2^{i} \leq w_{H_{i}}(C) \leq (1 + \epsilon') \cdot w_{G}(C) / 2^{i}.\] Therefore, \(\lambda' \leq (1+\epsilon') \lambda / 2^{i} \leq (1+\epsilon')20\ln n / \epsilon'^2\). If we pack \(96 (\lambda'+1)^7 \log^{3} m\) trees in \(\mathcal{T}\), then by Lemma [\[lem:treepacking\]](#lem:treepacking){reference-type="ref" reference="lem:treepacking"} there exists a tree crossing some minimum cut \(C^{*}\) of \(H_i\) only once. Notice that for any other cut \(C'\), \[w_{G}(C^{*}) \leq 2^{i} \cdot \frac{w_{H_i}(C^{*})}{1-\epsilon'} = 2^{i} \cdot \frac{\lambda'}{1-\epsilon'} \leq 2^{i} \cdot \frac{w_{H_{i}}(C')}{1-\epsilon'} \leq \frac{1+\epsilon'}{1-\epsilon'} \cdot w_{G}(C')\] ## Computing the Bridges Given a subgraph \(G_i\) of \(G\), it remains to show how to determine what edges of \(T\) are bridges in the subgraph \(T +G_i\) in \(\tilde{O}(D+\sqrt{n})\) rounds. Thurimella gave an algorithm for computing the biconnected components of the underlying graph in \(\tilde{O}(D+\sqrt{n})\) rounds. With simple modifications, it can be applied to compute which edges of \(T\) are bridges in the *subgraph* \(G_i\) of the underlying graph \(G\). Note that even we have the algorithm for computing the bridges of \(T\) in \(G+T\), it is not clearly whether we can directly simulate it to compute the bridges of \(T\) in \(G_i+T\), because we want the running time to depend on the diameter of \(G\) rather than that of \(G_i\). Therefore, we describe the algorithm and necessary changes below. Fix a root \(r\) in \(T\). Let \(\mathit{pre}(u) \in [0,n-1]\) be the preorder number which denote the time \(u\) is visited if we perform a depth-first search on \(T\) starting at \(r\). Denote the subtree rooted at \(u\) by \(T_u\) and let \(\mathit{size}(u)\) be the size of \(T_u\). Let \[\begin{aligned} \mathit{low}(u) &\defeq \min \begin{cases}\mathit{pre}(u) \\ \mathit{low}(v) & \mbox{\(v\) is a child of \(u\) in \(T\)} \\ \mathit{pre}(v) & \mbox{\(uv \in G_i \) \footnotemark}\end{cases} \\ \mathit{high}(u) &\defeq \max \begin{cases}\mathit{pre}(u) \\ \mathit{high}(v) & \mbox{\(v\) is a child of \(u\) in \(T\)} \\ \mathit{pre}(v) & \mbox{\(uv \in G_i\) \addtocounter{footnote}{-1}\footnotemark }\end{cases} \end{aligned}\] Now it remains to show how to compute \(\mathit{pre}(u)\), \(\mathit{low}(u)\), and \(\mathit{high}(u)\) in \(\tilde{O}(D+\sqrt{n})\) time. It is explicitly described in how to compute \(\mathit{pre}(u)\). Note that \(\mathit{pre}(u)\) is independent of the \(G_i\). Although \(\mathit{low}(u)\) and \(\mathit{high}(u)\) depend on \(G_i\), they can be computed in a similar way in \(\tilde{O}(D+\sqrt{n})\) time. For completeness, we describe how to compute these functions in the following. First, use Lemma [\[lem:decompose\]](#lem:decompose){reference-type="ref" reference="lem:decompose"} to decompose the rooted tree \(T\) into components \(F_1,\ldots F_{O(\sqrt{n})}\). For each component \(F_i\), there is a root \(r_i\) which is either the root of \(T\), \(r\), or the unique vertex in \(F_i\) connecting to its parent outside \(F_i\). It is shown in that the root \(r\) is able to downcast distinct messages of size \(O(\log n)\) to each of \(r_i\) in \(O(D+\sqrt{n})\) time. Conversely, it is possible for each of the \(r_i\) to upcast a message of size \(O(\log n)\) to the root \(r\) in \(O(D+\sqrt{n})\) time. Suppose each vertex has a unique ID. The component ID of \(F_i\) is defined to be the ID of \(r_i\). The component ID can be broadcast to every vertex in the component in \(O(\sqrt{n})\) rounds. We can then assume that the root \(r\) knows the topology of the contracted tree where each component is contracted into a single vertex. This can be done if every root \(r_i\) upcasts a message about the component ID of its parent and itself. To compute \(\mathit{pre}(u)\), each root \(r_i\) in each component first calculate the size of \(F_i\) then upcast it to \(r\). Since \(r\) knows the topology of the contracted tree, \(r\) can calculate the size of each subtree rooted at each of \(r_i\). Then \(r\) downcasts the size of subtree rooted at \(r_i\) back to \(r_i\). Now each \(F_i\) computes its preorder number internally in \(O(\sqrt{n})\) time assuming \(r_i\) has number \(0\). During the computation, each \(r_i\) also records what its preorder number is supposed to be if the depth-first search started from the root of its parent component. Finally, each \(r_i\) upcasts this number to \(r\) and then \(r\) computes the correct offset for each subtree and downcasts the offsets back to the \(r_i\). After adding the offset internally, we get the correct preorder number. To compute \(\mathit{low}(u)\), initially each vertex \(u\) computes \(\min(\mathit{pre}(u),\min_{uv \in G_i}\mathit{pre}(v))\) in constant rounds. Then the problem becomes aggregating the minimum in the subtree \(T_u\) for each \(u\). First, each \(r_i\) computes the minimum in \(F_i\) in \(O(\sqrt{n})\) time and then upcasts to \(r\). Using the information, \(r\) calculates the minimum of the subtrees rooted at each \(r_i\) and downcasts to each \(r_i\). Now each \(r_i\) sends the minimum to its parent via the inter-component links. The parent replace its minimum if it is smaller. Finally, each component \(F_i\) internally updates the minimum toward the root \(r_i\). Then each vertex has the correct minimum. \(\mathit{high}(u)\) can be computed in the same way. Therefore, the step of computing the bridges in \(T\) of \(G_i + T\) takes \(O(D + \sqrt{n} \log^{*} n)\) time. Each invocation of Test(\(T,\kappa\)) takes \(O(\frac{\log n}{\epsilon^2}(D+\sqrt{n} \log^{*} n))\) time. ## Running Time Now we analyze the running time of Algorithm [\[alg:approxmincut\]](#alg:approxmincut){reference-type="ref" reference="alg:approxmincut"}. The outerloop runs for \(O(\log n)\) iterations. Therefore, the tree packing, Line [\[line:treepacking\]](#line:treepacking){reference-type="ref" reference="line:treepacking"}, is executed \(O(\log n)\) times, each taking \(O(\log^{10} n / \epsilon^{14}(D + \sqrt{n}\log^{*} n))\) rounds. Let \(k = O(\log (nW))\) be the largest index such that \(X_k \leq nW\). The total number of iterations that the innerloop runs is at most \[\sum_{i=0}^{k} \log_{1+\epsilon'} \left(\frac{1+\epsilon'}{1-\epsilon'} \cdot \frac{X_{i+1}}{X_{i}}\right) = O(k) + \sum_{i=0}^{k} \log_{1+\epsilon'}\frac{X_{i+1}}{X_i} = O(k) + \log_{1+\epsilon'} (X_{k+1}) = O(\log n/ \epsilon)\] Therefore, Test(\(T,\kappa\)) is invoked at most \(O( (\log n / \epsilon)\cdot (\log^{10} n / \epsilon^{14}) )\) times, each taking \(O((\log n/ \epsilon^2)(D + \sqrt{n} \log^{*} n))\) rounds. The total running time is \[\begin{aligned} &O(\log n \cdot (\log^{10} n / \epsilon^{14})(D + \sqrt{n}\log^{*} n) ) + (\log^{11} n / \epsilon^{15})\cdot((\log n/ \epsilon^2)(D + \sqrt{n} \log^{*} n)) \\ &= O((\log^{12} n / \epsilon^{17}) \cdot (D + \sqrt{n}\log^{*} n) ) = \tilde{O}(D+\sqrt{n}) \end{aligned}\] The exponent of the \(\log n\) and the \(\epsilon\) in our running time depends heavily on the size of the greedy tree packing in Lemma [\[lem:treepacking\]](#lem:treepacking){reference-type="ref" reference="lem:treepacking"}. If one can show that \(O(\lambda^{a} \log^b n)\) trees is sufficient, then our running time can be improved to \(O((\log^{2+a+b} n / \epsilon^{2a+3})\cdot(D+ \sqrt{n} \log^{*} n) )\) rounds. Using Ghaffari and Kuhn's algorithm to approximate \(\lambda\) within a constant (Remark [\[rmk:combinedGK\]](#rmk:combinedGK){reference-type="ref" reference="rmk:combinedGK"}), we can get a running time of \(O((\log^{1+a+b} n / \epsilon^{2a+3} + (\log^2 n \log \log n)/\epsilon^5)\cdot(D+ \sqrt{n} \log^{*} n) )\). For comparison, Karger showed that a greedy tree packing of size \(O(\lambda \log n)\) is enough for any minimum cut to be crossed at most twice by some tree. It will be interesting to see if the number of trees in Lemma [\[lem:treepacking\]](#lem:treepacking){reference-type="ref" reference="lem:treepacking"} can be reduced.

{'timestamp': '2014-01-22T02:09:33', 'yymm': '1401', 'arxiv_id': '1401.5316', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5316'}

# Introduction In studies of core-collapse supernovae (SNe), the equation of state (EOS) of hot dense nuclear matter is one of the essential ingredients, and it has been developed in parallel with the progress of the research on core-collapse SNe. In the early stages of these studies, simple, analytically expressed nuclear EOSs were adopted, and the influence of the stiffness parameters included in the EOSs on the SN explosion was discussed. Hillebrandt and Wolff adopted a more realistic nuclear model: They constructed a nuclear EOS table based on the Skyrme--Hartree--Fock approach. After this study, Lattimer and Swesty (LS) provided an EOS for SN (SN-EOS) with use of a Skyrme-type interaction for uniform matter and a compressible liquid-drop model for non-uniform matter: This EOS has been widely adopted in numerical studies of SNe. About ten years later, Shen et al. constructed a new nuclear EOS based on the relativistic mean field (RMF) theory: In their studies, non-uniform nuclear matter is treated in the Thomas--Fermi (TF) approximation. The Shen EOS was provided as a table of thermodynamic quantities over an extremely wide range of densities, temperatures and proton fractions, and has been utilized conveniently in complicated numerical simulations of SNe. In recent years, the Shen EOS has been extended so as to take into account hyperons and quarks. In addition, RMF Lagrangians different from that adopted in the Shen EOS have been applied to the SN-EOS. Furthermore, the EOS of non-uniform matter has also been improved: Instead of the single-nucleus approximation adopted in the LS EOS and the Shen EOS, multiple nuclides are taken into account in Refs.. In these EOSs, as mentioned above, uniform matter is treated with phenomenological nuclear models. Since the nuclear EOS is governed by nuclear forces, it is desirable for nuclear EOSs constructed with many-body calculations starting from bare nuclear forces to be directly applied to SNe. In fact, nuclear EOSs of this type have been calculated for uniform matter, especially at zero temperature, and have been applied to the study of cold neutron stars (CNSs). However, studies of the EOS of hot asymmetric nuclear matter starting from bare nuclear forces are limited. It is also noted that, in the case of the Shen EOS, the parameter set of the RMF Lagrangian called TM1 is determined so that scalar and vector potentials of nuclear matter are close to those obtained by the Dirac--Brueckner--Hartree--Fock calculations with the nuclear potential Bonn A, but the Bonn A potential is not directly adopted in the Shen EOS. To our knowledge, there has been no study in which EOSs with microscopic many-body theories starting from bare nuclear forces have been applied directly to SN numerical simulations. Toward a more microscopic nuclear EOS, therefore, we are now constructing a new type of SN-EOS based on the realistic nuclear forces using the variational many-body theory. As the first step of our project, we have performed variational calculations starting from the Argonne v18 (AV18) two-body nuclear potential and the Urbana IX (UIX) three-body potential for hot asymmetric nuclear matter, as reported in Ref. . In this calculation, we have adopted a relatively simple cluster variational method in order to treat asymmetric nuclear matter, because the more sophisticated Fermi hypernetted chain (FHNC) variational method is hardly applicable to asymmetric nuclear matter. In spite of the large difference in the degree of sophistication between these two methods, the obtained (free) energies per nucleon for symmetric nuclear matter and neutron matter in the present EOS are in good agreement with those obtained with the FHNC calculations performed by Akmal et al. (APR) at zero temperature and by Mukherjee at finite temperatures. We are now at the stage of applying the uniform nuclear EOS based on the cluster variational method to core-collapse SNe; this application is the main aim of the study described in this paper. As the first step of our application, we perform general-relativistic, spherically symmetric hydrodynamic numerical simulations of SNe, and compare the results using the variational EOS with those using the Shen EOS as a reference SN-EOS. Here, we consider two SN simulations with and without neutrino transfer. Without the neutrino transfer, the weak reaction is switched off, and then the electron fraction of each fluid element is fixed during the simulation. Namely, the proton fractions of fluid elements are determined by the initial progenitor model, resulting in relatively large proton fractions, and then the dynamics is governed by the nuclear EOS with those large proton fractions. Therefore, the simulation without the neutrino transfer is not only suitable as a test of the application of our EOS to SN numerical codes, but also valuable as a study of the properties of the EOS with large proton fractions, though such a case is rather hypothetical. Then, as a more realistic case, we perform the SN simulation with the neutrino transfer by taking into account the weak reactions. In this case, the electron fraction decreases significantly by neutrino emissions, and then the EOS of neutron-rich nuclear matter plays an important role in the simulation. It is well known that, in general, the SN explosion is not successful in spherically symmetric calculations. We note that a successful 1D explosion has been reported for a progenitor of a low-mass star with an O--Ne--Mg core in Refs.. We consider here the collapse of the iron core of a massive star. In this case, 2 or 3D simulations are inevitably required in order to describe convection, which is an essential dynamical mode to ensure that fluid elements stay in the heating region longer to gain more energy from the neutrinos emitted from the inside of the core. In addition, the standing accretion shock instability mainly promoting dipole oscillation of the shock wave around proto-neutron stars (PNSs), which is found in multi-dimensional core-collapse simulations, may be advantageous for stellar explosions (see, e.g., Refs. ). Although these multi-dimensional effects cannot be treated in the spherically symmetric simulations, they become important at relatively late stages of the SN explosions. In the early stages of SNe, the gravitational collapse of the iron core of the progenitor and the subsequent core bounce, where the EOS of dense uniform matter plays essential roles, are well approximated in the spherically symmetric simulations. Therefore, as the first step of the application of the variational EOS to SNe, the spherically symmetric hydrodynamic simulation is appropriate. In order to perform the SN simulation, we also need a non-uniform EOS: The SN-EOS must cover an extremely wide range of densities, temperatures, and proton fractions, in contrast with the case of CNSs. We adopt, for simplicity, the non-uniform part of the Shen EOS, and connect it to the variational EOS for uniform matter in the SN simulations. In the next section, we review the uniform nuclear EOS adopted in this paper, and discuss some of the thermodynamic quantities of uniform isentropic SN matter with the variational EOS. In Sect. 3, we apply the variational EOS to a spherically symmetric general-relativistic hydrodynamical calculation of a core-collapse SN without the weak reactions. In Sect. 4, we apply the variational EOS to a more realistic SN simulation taking into account neutrino transfer. A summary and concluding remarks are given in Sect. 5. # The equation of state of supernova matter with the variational method ## Variational calculations of hot asymmetric nuclear matter In this section, we briefly review the nuclear EOS that we have constructed in Refs., and, based on it, derive an EOS of uniform SN matter. We start from the nuclear Hamiltonian composed of the AV18 two-body potential and the UIX three-body potential. At zero temperature, we first calculate the expectation value of the Hamiltonian without the three-body force in the two-body cluster approximation to obtain the two-body energy per nucleon \(E_2/N\). In this calculation, we employ the Jastrow wave function defined by \[\mathnormal{\Psi}=\mathrm{Sym}\left[\prod_{i<j}f_{ij}\right]\mathnormal{\Phi}_\mathrm{F}, \label{eq:jwf}\] where \(f_{ij}\) is composed of spin--isospin-dependent central, tensor, and spin--orbit correlation functions, which may also depend on the third component of the two-nucleon total isospin so as to treat asymmetric nuclear matter with arbitrary proton fractions \(Y_{\mathrm{p}}\). \(\mathrm{Sym}\)\[ \] is the symmetrizer with respect to the order of the factors in the products, and \(\mathnormal{\Phi}_\mathrm{F}\) is the degenerate Fermi-gas wave function. The correlation functions are determined through the minimization of \(E_2/N\) under the extended Mayer's condition and the healing distance condition: The former is a kind of normalization condition and the latter introduces a healing distance for the correlation functions. We assume that the healing distance is proportional to the mean distance between nucleons, and the coefficient is chosen so that the obtained \(E_2/N\) of symmetric nuclear matter and neutron matter are close to those obtained with the FHNC method by APR. The energy caused by the three-body force, \(E_3/N\), is constructed based on the expectation value of the three-body Hamiltonian with the degenerate Fermi-gas wave function. Here, with use of the uncertainty of the three-body force, the strength of the repulsive and two-pion-exchange components of the UIX potential are modified and a correction term, which is an explicit function of the nucleon number density \(n_{\mathrm{B}}\) and the proton fraction \(Y_{\mathrm{p}}\), is added somewhat phenomenologically. The values of the four parameters included in \(E_3/N\) are chosen so that the total energy per nucleon \(E/N =E_2/N +E_3/N\) reproduces the empirical saturation density \(n_0\), saturation energy \(E_0/N\), incompressibility \(K\), and symmetry energy \(E_{\mathrm{sym}}\). Furthermore, these parameters in \(E_3/N\) are fine-tuned so that the Thomas--Fermi calculations of isolated atomic nuclei with the present \(E/N\) reproduce the gross features of their experimental masses and radii, as reported in Ref.. The obtained values for the present EOS are \(n_0 = 0.16\) fm\(^{-3}\), \(E_0/N =-16.09\) MeV, \(K = 245\) MeV, and \(E_{\mathrm{sym}} = 30.0\) MeV. We note that the uncertainties in the empirical values of \(K\) and \(E_{\mathrm{sym}}\) are relatively large. The above-mentioned value of \(K\) is consistent with \(K = 240 \pm 10\) MeV deduced from the measurements of the isoscalar giant monopole resonance in medium-mass nuclei, as reported in Refs.. Similarly, the value of \(E_{\mathrm{sym}}\) lies in the range \(28 \lesssim E_{\mathrm{sym}} \lesssim 34\) MeV derived from the combination of constraints from experimental and CNS observational studies, as reported in Ref. and references therein. The obtained \(E/N\) for symmetric nuclear matter and neutron matter are in good agreement with the results of APR. In addition, the density dependence of the symmetry energy is consistent with the experimental data on heavy ion collisions. Furthermore, we have constructed the EOS of non-uniform matter at zero temperature with the TF calculation using the Wigner--Seitz approximation, and applied it to CNS crusts. Then, we have calculated the structure of CNSs. The maximum mass of CNSs is \(2.22\) \(M_\odot\), and the obtained mass--radius relation is consistent with the observational data analyzed by Steiner et al.. It is noted that the maximum mass with the present EOS is consistent with the recently observed masses of heavy CNSs. At finite temperatures, we have extended the variational method proposed by Schmidt and Pandharipande so as to calculate the free energy per nucleon \(F/N\) of asymmetric nuclear matter. In this method, we express \(F/N\) at temperature \(T\) as \[\frac{F}{N} = \frac{E_{\mathrm{0T}}}{N}-T\frac{S_0}{N}. \label{eq:FE}\] The approximate internal energy per nucleon \(E_{\mathrm{0T}}/N\) is the sum of the two-body energy \(E_{\mathrm{2T}}/N\) and the three-body energy \(E_{\mathrm{3T}}/N\). \(E_{\mathrm{2T}}/N\) is constructed by extending the two-body energy at zero temperature, \(E_2/N\), by replacing the nucleon occupation probabilities in \(\mathnormal{\Phi}_\mathrm{F}\) composing the Jastrow wave function Eq. ([\[eq:jwf\]](#eq:jwf){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:jwf"}) by the average occupation probabilities \(n_i(k)\) \((i=\mathrm{p}, \mathrm{n})\) for protons and neutrons, respectively. The explicit expression of \(n_i(k)\) is as follows: \[n_i(k) = \Bigg\{1+\exp \left[\frac{\varepsilon_i(k)-\mu_{0i}}{k_{\mathrm{B}}T}\right]\Bigg\}^{-1}. \label{eq:nk}\] Here, the quasi-nucleon energies \(\varepsilon_i(k)=\hbar^2k^2/2m_i^*\) are specified by the effective masses \(m_i^*\). For simplicity, \(E_{\mathrm{3T}}/N\) is assumed to be the same as \(E_3/N\) at zero temperature. The approximate entropy per nucleon \(S_0/N\) is also expressed with \(n_i(k)\) as \[\frac{S_0}{N} =-\sum_{i=\mathrm{p,n}} \frac{k_{\mathrm{B}}}{\pi^2 n_{\mathrm{B}}}\int_0^{\infty} \Bigl\{\left[1-n_i(k)\right]\ln\left[1-n_i(k)\right]+n_i(k)\ln n_i(k)\Bigl\}k^2dk.\] Then, \(F/N\) is minimized with respect to \(m^\ast_{\mathrm{p}}\) and \(m^\ast_{\mathrm{n}}\). The obtained \(F/N\) of symmetric nuclear matter and neutron matter are consistent with those obtained with the FHNC method, and thermodynamic self-consistency is confirmed, i.e., \(E_{\mathrm{0T}}/N\) coincides with the internal energy per nucleon derived from the obtained \(F/N\) through the thermodynamic relation. The obtained critical temperature of symmetric nuclear matter is about 18 MeV. ## The equation of state of isentropic neutrino-trapped supernova matter Using the variational EOS reported above, we investigate some of the thermodynamic quantities of uniform, neutrino-trapped SN matter, as compared with those with the Shen EOS. Namely, we consider charge-neutral and \(\beta\)-stable mixtures of nucleons, leptons, and photons, with fixed lepton number fractions per nucleon \(Y_{\mathrm{l}}\). As the leptons, we consider \(\mathrm{e}^-\), \(\mathrm{e}^+\), \(\nu_{\mathrm{e}}\), and \(\bar{\nu}_{\mathrm{e}}\), and treat them as relativistic non-interacting Fermi gases. Figure [\[fig:PNStemp\]](#fig:PNStemp){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:PNStemp"} shows the temperature \(T\) of isentropic SN matter as a function of the baryon number density \(n_{\mathrm{B}}\) for \(Y_{\mathrm{l}}\) = 0.3 and 0.4 at the entropy per baryon \(S\) = 1 and 2 in units of the Boltzmann constant \(k_{\mathrm{B}}\). Also shown in this figure are the results with the Shen EOS. It can be seen that \(T\) with the variational EOS at fixed \(S\) and \(Y_{\mathrm{l}}\) are close to those with the Shen EOS, though the results with the variational EOS are slightly lower in this density region. In Fig. [\[fig:PNStemp\]](#fig:PNStemp){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:PNStemp"}, the baryon mass density \(\rho_{\mathrm{B}}\) corresponding to \(n_{\mathrm{B}}\) is also shown. In this paper, we employ the definition \(\rho_{\mathrm{B}} = n_{\mathrm{B}}m_{\mathrm{u}}\) with \(m_{\mathrm{u}}\) being the atomic mass unit, by following the description of the Shen EOS. The fractions of neutrons, protons, electrons, and electron-neutrinos \(Y_i\) (\(i\) = n, p, e\(^-\), and \(\nu_{\mathrm{e}}\)) are shown in Fig. [\[fig:SNMYi\]](#fig:SNMYi){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:SNMYi"} as functions of the baryon number density \(n_{\mathrm{B}}\) for isentropic SN matter at \(S\) = 1 (left panel) and 2 (right panel). The neutron fraction \(Y_{\mathrm{n}}\) is the largest, and the proton fraction \(Y_{\mathrm{p}}\) coincides with the electron fraction \(Y_{\mathrm{e}}\) due to charge neutrality. There is no appreciable difference between the fractions with \(S\) = 1 and 2. In contrast, the increase in \(Y_{\mathrm{l}}\) affects the particle fractions considerably: In the case of \(Y_{\mathrm{l}}\) = 0.4, \(Y_{\mathrm{p}}\) and \(Y_{{\nu}_{\mathrm{e}}}\) become larger than in the case of \(Y_{\mathrm{l}}\) = 0.3, while \(Y_{\mathrm{n}}\) becomes smaller. The corresponding particle fractions in the case of the Shen EOS are also shown in this figure. It can be seen that \(Y_{\mathrm{n}}\) and \(Y_{{\nu}_{\mathrm{e}}}\) with the variational EOS are larger than those with the Shen EOS, while \(Y_{\mathrm{p}}\) with the present EOS is smaller. This is because the symmetry energy of the variational EOS is smaller than that of the Shen EOS in this density region. In fact, \(E_{\mathrm{sym}}=30.0\) MeV for the variational EOS at the saturation density, while \(E_{\mathrm{sym}}=36.9\) MeV for the Shen EOS. The pressure \(P\) of SN matter is shown in Fig. [\[fig:eos\]](#fig:eos){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:eos"}. It is seen that \(P\) increases with \(S\) and \(Y_{\mathrm{l}}\). At the densities \(n_{\mathrm{B}} \gtrsim 0.25\) fm\(^{-3}\), the contribution from the nucleon pressure to total \(P\) is dominant, while at lower densities, the contribution from the leptons and photons dominates. Since the central density of the collapsed core of an SN at the bounce is \(n_{\mathrm{B}} \sim 0.32\) fm\(^{-3}\), as we will see in the following sections, the pressure originating from nucleons is essential at the bounce of the core. Comparing the present results with those with the Shen EOS, we see that \(P\) with the variational EOS at a given set of \(S\) and \(Y_{\mathrm{l}}\) is smaller than the corresponding value with the Shen EOS. It is noted that, at least in the density region shown in these figures, the causality condition is satisfied. The critical baryon mass density from which the violation of the causality starts is \(\rho_{\mathrm{c}} = 1.5\times10^{15}\)g/cm\(^{3}\), corresponding to the critical number density \(n_{\mathrm{c}} = 0.93\) fm\(^{-3}\), for \(Y_{\mathrm{l}}\) = 0.3 and \(S=1\). This value is insensitive to the values of \(Y_{\mathrm{l}}\) and \(S\). On the other hand, the density relevant to SNe is \(\rho_{\mathrm{B}} \lesssim 5.2\times10^{14}\)g/cm\(^{3}\) (\(n_{\mathrm{B}} \lesssim 0.32\) fm\(^{-3}\)), which is sufficiently lower than the critical density \(\rho_{\mathrm{c}}\). Therefore, the present EOS is safely applicable to SN simulations. # Application to spherical adiabatic core-collapse supernovae In this section, we apply the present variational EOS to hydrodynamical numerical simulations of the core-collapse SN. We perform fully general-relativistic, spherically symmetric hydrodynamical calculations using the numerical code originally designed by Yamada. In this code the time evolution of the general-relativistic fluid elements is solved implicitly so that long-term calculations with a large time step are possible. This code was used in Ref. to perform SN simulations with the Shen EOS for various progenitor models in order to study the EOS of dense matter in dynamical situations, in addition to the study of the progenitor dependence of the SN hydrodynamics. Since one of our main purposes is to achieve the first application of the variational EOS to the SN hydrodynamic calculations, we choose a typical presupernova model, i.e., the 15 \(M_\odot\) model calculated by Woosley and Weaver. In this case, the mass of the iron core is 1.32 \(M_\odot\). In the hydrodynamical simulations, following the study of Ref., we use the part of the central core that includes the iron core with a density down to about \(10^6\)g/cm\(^3\). The mass of the central core treated in this simulation is 1.56 \(M_\odot\). Details of the structure of the central core, which is used as the initial condition, are reported in Ref.. As the simplest case of the SN simulations, we perform an adiabatic hydrodynamic calculation. In this case, the weak interaction is switched off, and then the electron fraction \(Y_{\mathrm{e}}\) of each fluid element does not change throughout the simulation. Since neutrinos are absent in the initial progenitor model, they do not appear throughout the simulation, and then there is no energy flow due to neutrino transfer in the SN matter, i.e., the evolution of the SN matter is adiabatic. Since \(Y_{\mathrm{e}}\) of each fluid element is maintained at the initial value, which is about 0.4--0.5, the dynamics of the SN is governed by the nuclear EOS with relatively large values of the proton fraction \(Y_{\mathrm{p}}\): We examine the effect of the variational EOS with such \(Y_{\mathrm{p}}\) on the SN hydrodynamics. In contrast, when the neutrino transfer is taken into account, the SN matter becomes more neutron-rich. In this case, we examine the effect of the EOS with relatively small values of \(Y_{\mathrm{p}}\). The latter case including the neutrino transfer is reported in the next section. In order to apply the present variational EOS to SN simulations, we first prepare a table of the free energies of hot asymmetric nuclear matter for the grid points of baryon mass densities \(\rho_{\mathrm{B}}\), temperatures \(T\), and proton fractions \(Y_{\mathrm{p}}\) as shown in Table [1](#table1){reference-type="ref" reference="table1"}. ::: The velocity profiles shown in Fig. [\[fig:velocity\]](#fig:velocity){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:velocity"} behave in a way similar to the case of the Shen EOS. In the first stage (1--4), the matter falls toward the center of the core, and the corresponding velocity profile consists of an inner self-similar collapse and an outer free fall. As the density of the matter approaches saturation density (5--9), the matter becomes stiffer, and then the falling materials decelerate to create an outgoing pressure wave. When the decelerated fluid elements bounce to attain positive velocities (10), a shock wave is created. Then, the shock wave propagates toward the surface of the core (11--15). This result implies that the variational EOS constructed in this paper can be successfully applied to sophisticated core-collapse SN simulations. Figure [\[fig:radius\]](#fig:radius){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:radius"} shows the trajectories of the mass mesh in the radius of the central core. The red curves are with the present EOS and the black ones are with the Shen EOS. Here, as in the case given above, the times at the bounce are chosen to be zero in both cases. This figure shows that, before the bounce, the trajectory of each fluid element falling toward the center of the iron core with the present EOS is completely the same as that with the Shen EOS, because the matter is not yet uniform. When the density of the matter becomes close to the nuclear saturation density around the time of the bounce, the trajectories with the present EOS deviate from those with the Shen EOS. In fact, at the bounce, it is seen in this figure that the lowest curves, corresponding to the innermost grid points, fall to smaller radii with the present EOS than those with the Shen EOS. This implies that the present EOS is softer than the Shen EOS in this adiabatic case (relatively large values of \(Y_{\mathrm{p}}\)). After the shock wave is launched outward, the fluid elements in the inner region of the core stagnate to form a PNS and those in the outer region of the core keep moving outward. It is seen that the radii at which the fluid elements with the present EOS stagnate are slightly smaller than those with the Shen EOS, i.e., the PNS born at the center of the core with the present EOS is more compact, releasing more gravitational energy due to the relative softness of the present EOS. Owing to this larger energy release, the fluid elements with the present EOS at larger radii move outward faster than those with the Shen EOS, and, correspondingly, the shock wave propagates faster. Finally, the shock waves reach the edges of the iron cores in both cases: This occurs 11 ms after the bounce with the variational EOS, which is 1 ms faster than that with the Shen EOS. This implies that, in both cases, the explosions are successful in this adiabatic approximation. In fact, most of the gravitational energy released by the core collapse is converted into the internal energy of the core and the kinetic energy of the fluid elements in the outer region. Although some of the energy is consumed by photodisintegration of iron when the shock wave propagates across the outer region of the core, the released energy is large enough to overcome such an energy loss. The explosion energy calculated with the definition given in Ref. (which calls for subtracting the baryon mass energy of the ejecta from their gravitational mass energy) is \(1.7\times10^{51}\) erg, which is larger than that in the case of the Shen EOS: \(1.5\times10^{51}\) erg. Figure [\[fig:densityTS\]](#fig:densityTS){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:densityTS"} shows the density profiles in the core at \(t_{\mathrm{pb}}= 0\) and 10 ms with both the variational and Shen EOSs. The central density with the variational EOS at the bounce is \(5.2\times10^{14}\) g/cm\(^3\), which is about twice the normal nuclear density, and it can be seen that the central density with the variational EOS at the bounce is higher than that with the Shen EOS. Correspondingly, the radius of the high-density core with the variational EOS is smaller. Namely, the high-density core region is more compact with the variational EOS, because the variational EOS is softer than the Shen EOS in this density region, as mentioned above. Here, we note that the relative softness of the present EOS is consistent with the fact that the incompressibility of symmetric nuclear matter with the variational EOS at the saturation density, \(K = 245\) MeV, is smaller than that of the Shen EOS, \(K = 281\) MeV. After the bounce (\(t_{\mathrm{pb}}=10\) ms), the central densities slightly decrease and the high-density regions spread for both of the EOSs. These results are consistent with the trajectories of the fluid elements in the inner region shown in Fig. [\[fig:radius\]](#fig:radius){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:radius"}. It is noted that the variational EOS used in this simulation is sufficiently causal: Since the highest density in the present simulation is the central density at the bounce, the matter in the density region used in this simulation is causal, as discussed in the last section. This fact is confirmed directly by the analysis of the sound velocity profiles in the present simulation. Figure [\[fig:gammaTS\]](#fig:gammaTS){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:gammaTS"} shows the adiabatic indices \(\Gamma\) at \(t_{\mathrm{pb}}=\) 0 and 10 ms as functions of the baryon mass coordinate \(M_{\mathrm{B}}\); also shown are those with the Shen EOS. The figure shows that, at the bounce, the \(\Gamma\) in the central region with high densities are significantly larger compared with those in the outer region where \(\Gamma \sim\) 4/3, the critical value with respect to gravitational instability. In the central region of the core, \(\Gamma\) with the present EOS is smaller than that with the Shen EOS, i.e., the present EOS is softer. A similar tendency is seen at \(t_{\mathrm{pb}} = 10\) ms. Figure [\[fig:entropyTS\]](#fig:entropyTS){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:entropyTS"} shows the profiles of the entropy \(S\) in the core as functions of the baryon mass coordinate \(M_{\mathrm{B}}\) at \(t_{\mathrm{pb}}=0\) and 10 ms, with our EOS and the Shen EOS. At the bounce, the entropy in the inner part of the core remains at about 1--1.5 because of the adiabatic collapse, and, behind the shock, the entropy increases steeply. The maximum entropy at the bounce is \(S \sim\) 4. As the shock wave propagates, the entropy behind the shock increases significantly, and, at \(t_{\mathrm{pb}}=10\) ms, \(S\) reaches about 11. It can also be seen that, at \(t_{\mathrm{pb}}=0\) and 10 ms, the \(S\) with the present EOS are close to those with the Shen EOS. Figure [\[fig:temperatureTS\]](#fig:temperatureTS){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:temperatureTS"} shows the temperature profiles in the core as functions of the baryon mass coordinate \(M_{\mathrm{B}}\) at \(t_{\mathrm{pb}}=0\) and 10 ms. It can be seen that, at the bounce, the temperatures \(T\) behind the shock are much higher than those in front of the shock for both of the EOSs; in particular, the temperatures \(T\) just behind the shock have sharp peaks (with the present EOS, the peak has a height of more than 20 MeV). Figure [\[fig:temperatureTS\]](#fig:temperatureTS){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:temperatureTS"} also shows that the \(T\) in the core with the present EOS are higher than those with the Shen EOS: the temperature \(T\) just behind the shock with the present EOS is higher by a few MeV. After the bounce (\(t_{\mathrm{pb}}=10\) ms), the profile behind the shock becomes relatively flat, and \(T\) with the present EOS is still higher than that with the Shen EOS. These differences between the profiles of \(T\) with these two EOSs are due to the relative compactness of the high-density core with the variational EOS: Since the present EOS is softer than the Shen EOS, the density of the central core with the present EOS is higher than that with the Shen EOS, and then the higher \(T\) follows. Figure [\[fig:muTS\]](#fig:muTS){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:muTS"} shows the chemical potentials of neutrons \(\mu_{\mathrm{n}}\) and protons \(\mu_{\mathrm{p}}\) at \(t_{\mathrm{pb}}=0\) and 10 ms. At the bounce, the shock is at \(M_{\mathrm{B}} \sim 0.9\) \(M_{\odot}\), and \(\mu_{\mathrm{p}} \sim \mu_{\mathrm{n}}\) at \(M_{\mathrm{B}} \gtrsim 0.9\) \(M_{\odot}\) because \(Y_{\mathrm{p}} \sim 0.5\) in front of the shock. Since the fluid elements just behind the shock are at high \(T\), the chemical potentials \(\mu_{\mathrm{p}}\) and \(\mu_{\mathrm{n}}\) abruptly become lower than those in front of the shock. In the inner region, the density increases, and then \(\mu_{\mathrm{p}}\) and \(\mu_{\mathrm{n}}\) increase. At \(t_{\mathrm{pb}}=10\) ms, the density profiles become flatter in this region (see Fig. [\[fig:densityTS\]](#fig:densityTS){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:densityTS"}), and, correspondingly, the profiles of \(\mu_{\mathrm{n}}\) and \(\mu_{\mathrm{p}}\) are also flatter. In both cases at \(t_{\mathrm{pb}}=0\) and 10 ms, it can be seen that the average of \(\mu_{\mathrm{p}}\) and \(\mu_{\mathrm{n}}\) with the variational EOS is higher than that with the Shen EOS, because the corresponding \(\rho_{\mathrm{B}}\) with the variational EOS is higher. Furthermore, the difference between \(\mu_{\mathrm{p}}\) and \(\mu_{\mathrm{n}}\) with the present EOS is smaller, because, as pointed out in the last section, the symmetry energy \(E_{\mathrm{sym}}\) with the variational EOS is smaller than that with the Shen EOS. As a result, the difference between \(\mu_{\mathrm{n}}\) with the variational and Shen EOSs is smaller than that between \(\mu_{\mathrm{p}}\) with the two EOSs, as seen in Fig. [\[fig:muTS\]](#fig:muTS){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:muTS"}, though the good agreement between \(\mu_{\mathrm{n}}\) with the present and Shen EOSs is rather accidental. # Application to core-collapse supernovae with neutrino transfer In this section, we take into account the weak reactions, which were neglected in the last section, and apply the EOS constructed in the last section to a spherical SN simulation with neutrino transfer, as a more realistic case. During the collapse and bounce of the presupernova core and the stage after the bounce, various weak reactions take place; then, a large number of neutrinos created through those reactions escape from the core carrying a large amount of energy away from the collapsed core. Due to these neutrino emissions and energy loss, the SN explosion is not successful in modern spherically symmetric numerical simulations. In this case, the core becomes neutron-rich owing to the electron-capture reactions, i.e., the hydrodynamics is governed by the SN-EOS at \(Y_{\mathrm{p}}\) values smaller than that of the adiabatic simulation. In this section, we adopt the numerical code of the general-relativistic spherically symmetric SN hydrodynamic simulations including neutrino transfer used in Ref., and perform the SN simulation starting from the presupernova model of 15 \(M_\odot\) by Woosley and Weaver as before. Details of the numerical calculations of hydrodynamics and the weak reactions included in this simulation are found in Refs.. As in the last section, we are interested in investigating the properties of the variational EOS in the SNe. Therefore, we focus on the behavior of the thermodynamic quantities in the high-density core region. Figure [\[fig:velocity2\]](#fig:velocity2){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:velocity2"} shows the time evolution of the velocity profiles obtained by the simulation including the neutrino transfer with the present variational EOS. The numbers denote the time sequence as in Fig. [\[fig:velocity\]](#fig:velocity){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:velocity"}: The numbers (1)--(4) correspond to the times when the central density reaches \(10^{11}\), \(10^{12}\), \(10^{13}\), and \(10^{14}\) g/cm\(^3\) during the collapse, respectively. The corresponding values of \(t_{\mathrm{pb}}\) are \(-24.5\), \(-5.80\), \(-1.54\), and \(-0.46\) ms, which are different from those shown in Table [2](#table2){reference-type="ref" reference="table2"}, because the collapses with and without the neutrino transfer are different from each other. The numbers (5)--(16) represent the times around and after the bounce, and the values of the corresponding \(t_{\mathrm{pb}}\) are the same as those shown in Table [2](#table2){reference-type="ref" reference="table2"}. The numbers (17)--(21) correspond to \(t_{\mathrm{pb}}=\)`<!-- -->`{=html}100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 ms, respectively. As in the adiabatic case, a pressure wave appears at the stage corresponding to (5) and it becomes a shock wave at the bounce (10). After the bounce, the shock propagates outward, but, in contrast with the adiabatic case, the shock wave stalls at (17)--(21) due to the energy loss by the neutrino emission. During the simulation (\(t_{\mathrm{pb}} \leq 500\) ms), there is no sign of revival of the shock due to heating by the neutrinos emitted from the inside of the core. This result is consistent with other modern 1D SN simulations. Figure [\[fig:density2\]](#fig:density2){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:density2"} shows the density profiles at \(t_{\mathrm{pb}} =\) 0, 100, and 500 ms. Also shown are the results with the Shen EOS. As can be seen in Fig. [\[fig:density2\]](#fig:density2){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:density2"}, the central density with the variational EOS becomes \(4.6\times10^{14}\) g/cm\(^3\) at the bounce, which is higher than the central density with the Shen EOS (\(3.4\times10^{14}\) g/cm\(^3\)). Correspondingly, the radius of the high-density core is smaller than that with the Shen EOS, as seen in this figure. These results imply that, even in the case with neutrino transfer, or with the smaller \(Y_{\mathrm{p}}\), as seen below, the present EOS is softer than the Shen EOS. This tendency is also seen at later phases. After the bounce, at \(t_{\mathrm{pb}} = 100\) ms, the central density is lower than that at the bounce, but, at \(t_{\mathrm{pb}} = 500\) ms, the central density becomes higher (\(\rho_{\mathrm{B}} = 5.2\times10^{14}\)g/cm\(^{3}\)): the inner core is compressed due to the materials accreting from the outside of the core. Here, we note that, as in the adiabatic simulation, the EOS in the density region used in the present simulation (\(t_{\mathrm{pb}}\leq 500\) ms) is sufficiently causal: this fact is confirmed by the analysis of the sound velocity profiles in this simulation. The adiabatic indices \(\Gamma\) at \(t_{\mathrm{pb}} = 0\) and 500 ms with the present and Shen EOSs are shown as functions of the baryon mass coordinate \(M_{\mathrm{B}}\) in Fig. [\[fig:gamma2\]](#fig:gamma2){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:gamma2"}. As in the adiabatic case, at \(t_{\mathrm{pb}}=0\) ms, \(\Gamma\) in the outer core is close to 4/3, while, in the inner core, \(\Gamma\) becomes larger. Corresponding to the results obtained from the density profiles, \(\Gamma\) in the central region with the variational EOS is smaller than that with the Shen EOS, showing that the variational EOS is softer. At \(t_{\mathrm{pb}}=500\) ms, \(\Gamma\) in the region \(M_{\mathrm{B}} \lesssim 1.5\) \(M_{\odot}\) is larger than 4/3 because the matter in this region is at high densities, as inferred from Fig. [\[fig:density2\]](#fig:density2){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:density2"}. Figure [\[fig:ye2\]](#fig:ye2){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:ye2"} shows the profiles of the electron fractions \(Y_{\mathrm{e}}\) at \(t_{\mathrm{pb}} =\) 0, 10, 100, and 500 ms. In contrast with the adiabatic case, \(Y_{\mathrm{e}}\) varies due to the weak reactions. At the bounce (\(t_{\mathrm{pb}} = 0\) s), \(Y_{\mathrm{e}}\) in the outer-core region decreases toward the center of the core, and, in the inner core (\(M_{\mathrm{B}} \lesssim 0.6\) \(M_{\odot}\)), \(Y_{\mathrm{e}}\) is about 0.28. This value of \(Y_{\mathrm{e}}\) is smaller than its initial value (\(Y_{\mathrm{e}}=Y_{\mathrm{l}} \gtrsim 0.4\)) due to the electron-capture reactions. In fact, in the central region of the inner core, the lepton fraction \(Y_{\mathrm{l}}\) including the fraction of neutrinos is \(Y_{\mathrm{l}} \sim 0.35\), which is smaller than the initial value of \(Y_{\mathrm{l}}\). It is also seen that, at the bounce, \(Y_{\mathrm{e}}\) with the present EOS in the central region is smaller than that with the Shen EOS. Here, we note that, at the bounce, \(Y_{\mathrm{l}}\) with the variational EOS is close to that with the Shen EOS. The smaller \(Y_{\mathrm{e}}\) at the central region with the present EOS is mainly caused by the smaller symmetry energy \(E_{\mathrm{sym}}\), as demonstrated in Fig. [\[fig:SNMYi\]](#fig:SNMYi){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:SNMYi"}. At later stages in the evolution, the profiles of \(Y_{\mathrm{e}}\) with the present EOS are similar to those in the case with the Shen EOS; \(Y_{\mathrm{e}}\) in the outer core decreases and, just behind the shock at \(t_{\mathrm{pb}} = 500\) ms, \(Y_{\mathrm{e}} \sim 0.03\), which exemplifies the necessity for an SN-EOS to cover a wide range of \(Y_{\mathrm{e}}\). We also note that, at later stages, \(Y_{\mathrm{l}}\) decreases toward the surface of the core, as in the case of \(Y_{\mathrm{e}}\) shown in this figure. Figure [\[fig:entropy2\]](#fig:entropy2){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:entropy2"} shows the profiles of the entropy \(S\) at \(t_{\mathrm{pb}} =\) 0, 10, 100, and 500 ms with the present and Shen EOSs. As in the case of the adiabatic collapse, \(S\) has a jump behind the shock (about 3 at the bounce), and \(S\) increases, especially behind the shock front as time passes. In later stages, for \(t_{\mathrm{pb}} \gtrsim 100\) ms, the profile of \(S\) has a sharp peak just behind the shock and a hump at \(M_{\mathrm{B}} \sim 0.8\) \(M_{\odot}\). \(S\) decreases gradually at the outer region behind the shock: This negative gradient of \(S\), together with the negative gradient of \(Y_{\mathrm{l}}\) mentioned above, implies the possibility of instability with respect to convection, as discussed in Ref.. \(S\) in the inner region increases gradually, while the hump decreases at later stages. It can also be seen that the \(S\) with the variational EOS are very close to those with the Shen EOS. The temperature profiles are shown in Fig. [\[fig:temp2\]](#fig:temp2){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:temp2"}. The profile at the bounce is similar to that of the adiabatic calculation: At \(t_{\mathrm{pb}}=0\) ms, \(T\) behind the shock is about 15 MeV with the present EOS, which is higher than that with the Shen EOS, due to the compactness of the inner core with the present EOS. Even at later stages, \(T\) is still higher with the variational EOS: The maximum value of \(T\) is about 40 MeV at \(t_{\mathrm{pb}}=500\) ms, which is about 5 MeV higher than that with the Shen EOS. Figure [\[fig:mu2\]](#fig:mu2){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:mu2"} shows the proton chemical potentials \(\mu_{\mathrm{p}}\) and the neutron chemical potentials \(\mu_{\mathrm{n}}\) at \(t_{\mathrm{pb}}=0\) ms (upper panel) and 500 ms (lower panel). It can be seen that, as in the adiabatic case, the average of \(\mu_{\mathrm{n}}\) and \(\mu_{\mathrm{p}}\) with the variational EOS is higher than that with the Shen EOS due to the higher densities with the present EOS, and, owing to the smaller \(E_{\mathrm{sym}}\), the difference between \(\mu_{\mathrm{n}}\) and \(\mu_{\mathrm{p}}\) is smaller with the variational EOS. In fact, \(\mu_{\mathrm{n}}\) with the present EOS tends to be close to that with the Shen EOS, while \(\mu_{\mathrm{p}}\) tends to be higher in the central high-density region. The good agreement between \(\mu_{\mathrm{n}}\) with the present and Shen EOSs is rather accidental. # Summary and concluding remarks In this paper, we have applied the EOS of hot uniform nuclear matter based on the cluster variational method with the AV18 two-body potential and the UIX three-body potential to spherically symmetric SN numerical simulations. To our knowledge, this is the first application of the many-body nuclear EOS based on bare nuclear forces to SN numerical simulations. Before the application to SN simulations, we examined uniform isentropic SN matter with fixed lepton number fractions. The temperatures of isentropic SN matter (\(S =1\) and 2) with the variational EOS were close to but slightly lower than those with the Shen EOS. The SN matter with the variational EOS was more neutron-rich, because the symmetry energy of the variational EOS, \(E_{\mathrm{sym}}\) = 30.0 MeV, is smaller than that of the Shen EOS, \(E_{\mathrm{sym}}\) = 36.9 MeV. It was also found that the pressures with the variational EOS are lower than those with the Shen EOS. In the application of the variational EOS to SN simulations, it was supplemented by the Shen EOS for low-density non-uniform matter. Starting from the 15 \(M_{\odot}\) presupernova model constructed by Woosley and Weaver, we performed the general-relativistic spherically symmetric SN simulations without neutrino transfer, as a test calculation, and with neutrino transfer, as a more realistic case. We found that the numerical codes run successfully with the present EOS, i.e., the present EOS is applicable to more realistic SN numerical simulations. In the adiabatic calculation without the weak reactions, it was seen that the stellar core created after the bounce with the variational EOS is more compact than that with the Shen EOS, implying that the present EOS in the adiabatic case (\(Y_{\mathrm{p}} \gtrsim 0.4\)) is softer than the Shen EOS. This softness of the present EOS results in a larger explosion energy of \(1.7\times10^{51}\) erg, as compared with the case of the Shen EOS. Here, we note that this relative softness of the variational EOS is consistent with the fact that the incompressibility of the present EOS, \(K = 245\) MeV, is smaller than that of the Shen EOS, \(K = 281\) MeV. In the case including neutrino transfer, the shock created after the bounce stalls due to the energy loss by the neutrino emissions. Also, in the case with smaller \(Y_{\mathrm{p}}\), it was seen that the present EOS is softer than the Shen EOS. The electron fraction \(Y_{\mathrm{e}}\) in the central region of the core with the variational EOS is found to be smaller than that with the Shen EOS at the bounce. This is because \(Y_{\mathrm{l}}\) with the present EOS is similar to that with the Shen EOS at the bounce and the symmetry energy with the present EOS is smaller. As mentioned before, in the SN simulation with neutrino transfer, we have focused on the thermodynamic properties of the inner core, because our aim is to examine the uniform variational EOS for small values of \(Y_{\mathrm{p}}\). Therefore, we have not discussed the behavior of the emitted neutrinos, such as their energy spectra or luminosities: These quantities are largely affected by the compositions of the SN matter in the non-uniform region where we use the Shen EOS in the present calculations. Since the present EOS is consistent with the observational data on cold neutron stars (both the masses and radii) and provides larger explosion energy than the Shen EOS, it has preferable features as an SN-EOS; it is certainly desirable to apply this EOS to multi-dimensional SN simulations that are more realistic. The application of the variational EOS to SN simulations for a series of progenitors with various masses, including one with an O--Ne--Mg core, is also interesting. Furthermore, it is fascinating to study the influence of the uncertainty in the three-body force on the SN dynamics. In fact, the uncertainty in the three-body force, which is deeply related to the symmetry energy, has been considered in studies on neutron stars. For example, in Ref., the UIX and the Illinois models of the three-body potentials are employed in Monte Carlo calculations of the neutron matter EOS at zero temperature, and the neutron-star structure with those three-body forces is studied systematically; extensions of the present study will enable us to perform similar investigations on the dynamics of the core-collapse SNe. Before further advancing those applications and extensions, however, an EOS of non-uniform matter self-consistently based on the variational EOS must inevitably be constructed. In fact, the EOS of non-uniform matter determines the initial condition, electron capture rates, dynamics of the collapsing core, and various neutrino reactions at later stages after bounce, in the SN simulations. Construction of the non-uniform EOS that is consistent with the present uniform EOS is now in progress, and will be reported elsewhere in the near future.

{'timestamp': '2014-03-05T02:05:32', 'yymm': '1401', 'arxiv_id': '1401.5579', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5579'}

# Introduction and Main Result Consider the classical random trigonometric polynomials, that is, the polynomials defined, for \(K=1,2,\dots\), by \[\label{f:tk} T_{K}(t):=\frac{1}{\sqrt{K}}\sum^{K}_{n=1}a_{n}\cos(nt),\] where the coefficients \(a_n\) are i.i.d. standard Gaussian random variables and \(t\in[0,\pi]\). One of the main questions about random polynomials concerns the random variable: *number of zeros* (level crossings in general); in our case the number of zeros of \(T_K\) on the interval \([0,\pi]\). The distribution of this random variable remains unknown, and one way to approach it is to describe it not directly but through its moments. The asymptotic expectation of the number of zeros of classical trigonometric polynomials on \([0,\pi]\) is known since Dunnage's work to be \(K/\sqrt{3}\). The variance of \(T_K\) was conjectured by Farahmand & Sambandham and Granville & Wigman to be equivalent to \(V^2 K\pi\), as \(K\) grows to infinity, for some constant \(V^2>0\). Recently Su & Shao in give a positive answer to this conjecture. They obtain the exact asymptotic behavior of the variance of the number of roots on \([0,\pi]\) for the classical trigonometric polynomials. In this article we revisit the above result. We exhibit a simplified proof. Furthermore, and this is the main result of our work, we establish a Central Limit Theorem (CLT) for the number of zeros of \(T_K\) on \([0,\pi]\) as \(K\to\infty\). Observe that since \(\cos(t)=\cos(2\pi-t)\) the number of zeros of \(T_K\) on \([0,2\pi]\) is exactly twice the number of zeros of \(T_K\) on \([0,\pi]\). Hence, all the results can be trivially adapted to \([0,2\pi]\). Furthermore, it is easy to see that \(T_K\) and its derivatives are jointly non-degenerated Gaussian. Hence \(T_K\) has not multiple zeros almost suerely. Our main result is the following. Let us denote the number of zeros of a Gaussian process \(Z: \mathbb R\to \mathbb R\) on the interval \(I\) by \(N_{Z}(I):=\#\{t\in I:\, Z(t)=0\}\). In particular, we prove that \[\lim_{K\to\infty}\frac{\mbox{\rm Var}(N_{T_K}([0,K\pi]))}{K\pi}=\lim_{K\to\infty}\frac{\mbox{\rm Var}(N_{X_K}([0,K\pi]))}{K\pi},\] where \(X_K\) are the stationary trigonometric polynomials defined by \[\label{Xk} X_{K}(t)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{K}}\sum^{K}_{n=1}\left(a_{n}\cos(nt)+b_n\sin(nt)\right),\] being \(a_n\), \(b_n\) i.i.d. standard Gaussian random variables. The stationary trigonometric polynomials were studied by Granville & Wigman, Azaïs & León, see also the references therein. By and we deduce that \(\mbox{\rm Var}(N_X([0,\pi]))\) is equivalent to \(V^2K\pi\) with \[V^2\approx 0.089.\] As said above, Su & Shao show that the variance of the number of zeros of \(T_K\) is equivalent to \(cK\pi\) as \(K\to\infty\) where \(c\) is a complicated constant, \(c\approx 0.257\). Therefore, our result is not in concordance with this value. We checked our result by numerical simulations.\ As a by product of our proof, we obtain the following CLT for the number of zeros of a non-stationary Gaussian process on \([0,\infty)\) as the interval increases. The cardinal sine function is defined by \[\text{sc}(x)=\frac{\sin(x)}{x}.\] Classical random trigonometric polynomials appears in Phy-sics, for instance in nuclear physics (random matrix theory), statistical mechanics, quantum mechanics, theory of noise, see Granville & Wigman and references therein. The number of zeros of different ensembles of random polynomials have attracted attention of physicists and mathematicians for at least seventy years. Consequently, there is an extensive literature on the subject, starting with Littlewood & Offord who studied algebraic polynomials, these works were complemented by those of Erdös & Offord, Kac and Ibragimov & Maslova. The final result for the mean number of roots of an algebraic polynomial of degree \(K\), is that, for \(i.i.d.\) coefficients in the domain of attraction of the normal law, the mean number of roots is equivalent to \(2\log(K)/\pi\) for centered \(a_n\) and half this quantity for non-centered \(a_n\). Maslova established the asymptotic variance and a CLT for the number of zeros of algebraic polynomials. In the case of \(X_K\) the stationarity and the Gaussianity simplify largely the treatment of the level crossing counting problem. For this ensemble of (stationary) trigonometric polynomials Granville & Wigman gave a proof of the CLT for the number of zeros, using conditions on moments of order higher than the second. After that, Azaïs & León extended this result to all levels and gave a simplified proof of the CLT lying on the Wiener Chaos decomposition and Taqqu-Peccati's method. In particular, avoiding conditions on higher moments than the second. Finally, for Classical Trigonometric Polynomials, Wilkins proved that \[\mathbb E\left(N_{T_K}[0,2\pi]\right)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}\left[(2K+1)+D_1+\frac{D_2}{2K+1}+\frac{D_3}{(2K+1)^2}\right]+O\left(\frac{D_3}{(2K+1)^3}\right)\] with \(D_1=0.23\dots\), etc. The leading asymptotic term was proven to be the same for non-centered coefficients and for dependent coefficients with constant correlation, see Farahmand and references therein. Recently, Farahmand & Li considered the mean number of roots of \(T_K\) and \(X_K\) allowing its coefficients to have different means and variances, but being independent and Gaussian.\ In order to obtain our results we make use of the techniques of Wiener Chaos expansion, Peccati-Tudor's method for obtaining CLTs and Rice Formula. More precisely, we obtain the Wiener Chaos expansion for the normalized number of zeros of the normalized version of \(T_K\) on the interval \([0,\pi]\). Then, we use this expansion in order to obtain the order of the asynptotic variance. A key fact, is that removing the extremes of the interval, the behavior of (the covariance of the standardized version of) \(T_K\) is very similar to that of (the covariance of) its stationary counterpart \(X_K\), so the limit variances of the respective number of zeros coincide. Our work closely follows Azaı̈s & León, but the asymptotic Gaussianity is obtained directly from Peccati-Tudor's method rather than through the \(L^2\) proximity to the limit process. In that sense, it is worth to remark that whereas in the case of stationary trigonometric polynomials the CLT is inherited from that of the limit process, in our case the CLT for the limit process is a consequence of the CLT for classical trigonometric polynomials. The article is organized as follows. It contains three sections. The present one introducing the subject and establishing the main result. The second one contains the proof of the main result. This section is split into two subsections. The first deals with the expansion into the Wiener Chaos of the crossings and the second contains the proof of the central limit theorem for these crossings once centered and normalized. The third section contains the proof of five useful lemmas and also includes a notation table. # Proof ## Expansion into the Chaos. Let us replace \(t\) by \(t/K\), this permits us to look at the polynomials \(T_K\) at a convenient scale and to find a limit for them. Thus, from now on we are concerned with the zeros on the interval \([0,K\pi]\) of \[\label{f:tt} \widetilde T_K(t)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{K}}\sum^K_{n=1}a_n\cos\left(\frac{n}{K}t\right).\] Similarly, let \(\widetilde X_K(t)=X_K(t/K)\), with \(X_K\) defined in Equation [\[Xk\]](#Xk){reference-type="eqref" reference="Xk"}. Clearly \(\widetilde T_K\) and \(\widetilde X_K\) are centered Gaussian processes in \(t\in[0,K\pi]\). Denote by \(c_K\) the covariance function of \(\widetilde X_K\), it is well known, see Azaïs & León, Granville & Wigman, that \[\label{cK} c_K(t-s)=\mathbb E\left( \widetilde X_K(s) \widetilde X_K(t)\right)=\frac{1}{K}\sum^{K}_{n=1}\cos\left(\frac{n}{K}(t-s)\right).\] Note that \(c_K(\cdot)\) can be seen as a Riemann sum for \(\int^1_0\cos(u\cdot)du\). Further, \(c_K\) can be expressed in closed form using Fejér Kernel. A direct computation shows that the covariance function of the classical trigonometric polynomials, \(r_K(s,t):=\mathbb E\left( \widetilde T_K(s) \widetilde T_K(t)\right)\), is given by \[\label{rK} r_K(s,t)=\frac{1}{2}(c_K(t-s)+c_K(t+s)).\] In particular, the variance of \(\widetilde T_K(t)\) is \[V^2_K(t):=r_K(t,t)=\frac{1}{2}(1+c_K(2t)).\] Thus, the limit variance, as \(t\to\infty\), is \(\textonehalf\) and not \(1\) as in the stationary case. Needless to say that the processes obtained from the \(\widetilde T_K\)'s replacing the cosines by sines have also asymptotic variance \(\textonehalf\). At \(t=0\), \(\widetilde T_K\) and \(\widetilde X_K\) have the same variance. From now on, we work on the case \(s<t\) and denote \(\tau:=t-s\) and \(\sigma:=t+s\). It is convenient to use the standardized version of \(\widetilde T_K\), namely \[\label{def} \overline{T}_K(t):=\widetilde T_K(t)/V_K(t),\] thus \(\overline{T}_K\) has unit variances and its covariance, \(\overline{r}_K\), is given by \[\label{barr} \overline{r}_K(s,t)=\frac{c_K(\tau)+c_K(\sigma)}{\sqrt{1+c_K(2s)}\sqrt{1+c_K(2t)}}.\] We collect in the following lemma some basic properties of \(c_K\) taken from Azaïs & León. We also need the following bounds. From Equations [\[cK\]](#cK){reference-type="eqref" reference="cK"}, [\[rK\]](#rK){reference-type="eqref" reference="rK"} and Lemma [\[lema:cK\]](#lema:cK){reference-type="ref" reference="lema:cK"} it follows that \[\label{limitsc} r_K(s,t)\to r(s,t):=\frac{1}{2}(\text{sc}(\tau)+\text{sc}(\sigma)),\] as \(K\to\infty\) for all \(s,t\in[0,K\pi]\) and that this convergence is uniform in off-diagonal compacts (compacts not containing points in the diagonal \(s=t\)). Furthermore, the order one and order two derivatives of \(r_K\) converge in the same manner to the corresponding derivatives of \(r\) respectively. Besides the following bounds hold for \(s,t\in[0,K\pi]\) \[\begin{gathered} \label{cota:supr} |r_K(s,t)|\leq\frac{\pi}{\tau}+\frac{\pi}{\sigma},\quad |\partial_{i}r_K(s,t)|\leq\frac{\pi}{2\tau}+\frac{\pi}{2\sigma}+\frac{\pi^2}{4\tau^2}+\frac{\pi^2}{4\sigma^2},\\ |\partial_{ij}r_K(s,t)|\leq c\left(\frac{1}{\tau}+\frac{1}{\sigma}+\frac{1}{\tau^2}+\frac{1}{\sigma^2} +\frac{1}{\tau^3}+\frac{1}{\sigma^3}\right), \end{gathered}\] where \(i,j=s,t\) and \(c\) is some constant; and \[\label{cota:supvar} V^{2}_{K}(t)\leq\frac{1}{2}\left[1+\frac{\pi}{2t}\right].\] Finally, observe that for \(t_0\) large enough and \(s,t\in[t_0,K\pi-t_0]\), \(\overline{r}_K(s,t)\) and its derivatives converge to \[\label{limitscbar} \overline{r}(s,t)=\frac{\text{sc}(\tau)+\text{sc}(\sigma)}{\sqrt{1+\text{sc}(2s)}\sqrt{1+\text{sc}(2t)}},\] and its derivatives respectively uniformly in off-diagonal compacts. This is enough for our purposes. Therefore, \(\widetilde T_K\), \(\overline{T}_K\) converge (in the described sense) to centered Gaussian processes \(T\) and \(\overline{T}\) on the positive real axis having, respectively, covariances given by [\[limitsc\]](#limitsc){reference-type="eqref" reference="limitsc"} and [\[limitscbar\]](#limitscbar){reference-type="eqref" reference="limitscbar"}. In the sequel we need also to renormalized \(\overline{T}'_k\) in order to set its varaince to 1. So we define the standard deviation of \(\overline{T}^{\prime}_K(s)\): \[\label{vK} v_K(s):=\sqrt{\overline{r}^{(1,1)}_{K}(s,s)},\] where \(r_K^{(i,j)}(s,t) :=\frac{ \partial ^{i+j}}{\partial^i s \partial^j t } r_K\) and \[\label{f:cal} \mathcal T^{\prime}_K(s)=\overline{T}^{\prime}_K(s)/v_{K}(s).\] For the sake of readability, we write all the trigonometric polynomials on the same probability space. Note that, since we only care about distributions in the sequel, this is not really necessary. Let \(B=(B_\lambda)\) be a standard Brownian Motion defined on a probability space \((\Omega,{\cal F},\mathbb P)\). We assume that \({\cal F}\) is generated by \(B\). By the isometric property of the stochastic integral, we have \[\label{f:gam} \widetilde T_K(t)=\int^1_0\gamma_{K}(t,\lambda)dB_{\lambda},\quad \gamma_K(t,\lambda)=\sum^{K}_{n=1}\cos\left(\frac{n}{K}t\right)\mathbf{1}_{\left[\frac{n-1}{K},\frac{n}{K}\right)}(\lambda)\] being \(\mathbf{1}_A\) the indicator (or characteristic) function of the set \(A\). Thus, the processes \(\widetilde T_K:K=1,2,\dots\) are defined on the same probability space. Furthermore, let \(\boldsymbol H\) be the Hilbert space \(L^2([0,1],{\cal B},d\lambda)\), being \({\cal B}\) the Borel \(\sigma\)-algebra and \(d\lambda\) the Lebesgue measure, with the usual inner product \(\left\langle g,h\right\rangle=\int^1_0g(\lambda)h(\lambda)d\lambda\). Thus, the map \[h\mapsto B(h):=\int^1_0h(\lambda)dB_{\lambda},\] defines an isometry between \(\boldsymbol H\) and \(L^2(\Omega)=L^2(\Omega,{\cal F},\mathbb P)\). In this situation, \((B(h):h\in\boldsymbol H)\) is called an isonormal process associated to \(\boldsymbol H\). In particular, we have \[\widetilde T_K(t)=B(\gamma_K(t,\cdot)),\,\overline{T}_K(t)=B(h_K(t,\cdot)), \mbox{ with } h_K(t,\cdot)=\gamma_K(t,\cdot)/V_K(t),\] and \[\mathcal{T}^\prime_K(t):=B(h^\prime_K(t,\cdot)),\, \mbox{ with } h^{\prime}_K(t,\cdot)=\partial_th_K(t,\cdot)/\|\partial_th_K(t,\cdot)\|_2.\] In addition, \(T(t)=B(\mathbf{1}_{[0,1]}(\cdot)\cos(t\cdot))\).\ The main idea of the proof of the CLT is to take advantage of the fact that the covariances of \(\widetilde{T}_K\) and \(\widetilde X_K\) are very similar one to each other for large values of \(s,t\), even \(\widetilde T_K\) being non-stationary. This idea is supported by the following lemma. Denote \([0,K\pi]_{-{\alpha}}=[(K\pi)^{\alpha},K\pi-(K\pi)^{\alpha}]\) for \(\alpha\in(0,1/2)\).  Then, it suffices to prove that \[\frac{N_{\overline{T}_K}\left([0,K\pi]_{-\alpha}\right)-\mathbb E\left(N_{\overline{T}_K}\left([0,K\pi]_{-\alpha}\right)\right)} {\sqrt{K\pi}}\Rightarrow N(0,V^2).\] Following Kratz & León we can establish the expansion of the number of roots in the Wiener Chaos.\ We need some facts about Hermite Polynomials, Multiple Wiener-Itô Integrals and the Chaotic Expansions, see Peccati & Taqqu and Hiu-Hsiung Kuo for details on the definitions and the results listed below. The Hermite polynomials \(H_q\) are defined by \[H_{q}(x)=(-1)^{q}e^{x^2/2}\left.\frac{d^{q}}{dt^{q}}e^{-t^2/2}\right|_{t=x}.\] The family \((H_q:q\geq 0)\) is a complete orthogonal system in \(L^2(\mathbb R,\varphi(dx))\) with \(\|H_q\|^2_2=q!\). Here \(\varphi\) stands for the standard Gaussian density function. Besides, for \(q\geq 1\), the \(q\)-fold multiple Wiener-Itô integral w.r.t \(B\), \(I^{B}_q\), can be introduced as the linear isometry, between the symmetric tensor product \(L^2_s([0,1]^{q})=\boldsymbol H^{\odot q}\) with the norm \(\sqrt{q!}\|\cdot\|_{L^2([0,1]^q)}\) and its image in \(L^2(\Omega)\), induced by \[\label{eq:hqI} I^{B}_q(h^{\otimes q})=H_q(B(h)).\] for \(h\in\boldsymbol H\), with unit norm and \(h^{\otimes q}(\lambda_1,\dots,\lambda_q)=\prod^{q}_{k=1}h(\lambda_k)\). For \(q\geq 1\), the \(q\)-th Wiener Chaos \({\cal H}_q\) is defined as the image of \(I^B_q\). Furthermore, denoting the set of constants by \({\cal H}_0\), we have \[L^2(\Omega,{\cal F},\mathbb P)=\bigoplus^{\infty}_{q=0}{\cal H}_q,\] where \(\oplus\) indicates an orthogonal sum. In other words, for any square integrable functional, \(F\in L^2(\Omega,{\cal F},\mathbb P)\), of the Brownian motion \(B\), there exists a unique sequence of symmetric functionals \((f_q:q\geq 1)\) with \(f_q\in L^{2}([0,1]^{q})\), such that \[\label{eq:hermexp} F-\mathbb E(F)=\sum^{\infty}_{q=1}I^{B}_{q}(f_q),\] where the equality holds in the \(L^2\) sense.\ We now write the Wiener Chaos expansion for the number of crossings. We need some notations. Denote \[\label{f:akbk} a_{2\ell}=\sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi}}\frac{(-1)^{\ell+1}}{2^{\ell}\ell!(2\ell-1)}, \quad b_{k}= \begin{cases} (-1)^{k/2}(k-1)!!,&\textrm{ if }k\textrm{ is even}\\ 0,&\textrm{ if }k\textrm{ is odd} \end{cases}\] where \((2n-1)!!=\prod^{n}_{j=1}(2j-1)\); \[\label{f:fq} f_q(x,y)=\sum^{\left\lfloor q/2\right\rfloor}_{\ell=0} b_{q-2\ell}a_{2\ell}H_{q-2\ell}(x)H_{2\ell}(y),\] \[\label{f:iqtk} I^{\overline{T}_K}_{q}\left([0,K\pi]_{-{\alpha}}\right)= \frac{1}{\sqrt{K\pi}} \int_{[0,K\pi]_{-{\alpha}}}f_{q}\left(\overline{T}_K(s),\mathcal {T}^{\prime}_K(s)\right)v_K(s)ds\] The following two lemmas are the tools for proving the above theorem. The first one shows that the second moment of the crossings of zero of \(\overline{T}_K\) is finite. Following the arguments in Azaïs & León we obtain the asymptotic variance of the number of zeros of \(\overline{T}_K\) on \([0,K\pi]_{-\alpha}\) as \(K\to\infty\). Furthermore, in Proposition [\[conv:var\]](#conv:var){reference-type="ref" reference="conv:var"} we show that the limit variance of \(N_{\overline{T}_K}([0,K\pi]_{-\alpha})\) coincides with that of the number of zeros, \(N_{X}([0,K\pi]_{-\alpha})\), of the stationary Gaussian process \(X\). The following lemma gives a uniform upper bound (on \(K\)) for these variances. We are ready to compare the limit variances of \(N_{\overline{T}_K}\left([0,K\pi]_{-\alpha}\right)/\sqrt{K\pi}\) and \(N_{X}\left([0,K\pi]_{-\alpha}\right)/\sqrt{K\pi}\). ##  CLT for the number of roots of Classical Trigonometric Polynomials: This section is devoted to prove our main result: Theorem [\[main\]](#main){reference-type="ref" reference="main"}. Recall that for \(q=1\), the random variables \(I^{\overline{T}_K}_1\left([0,K\pi]_{-\alpha}\right)=0\) for all \(K\) because \(b_1=0\). We use the Fourth Moment Theorem by Peccati & Tudor. By Equation [\[f-q\]](#f-q){reference-type="eqref" reference="f-q"} we know that \(I^{\overline{T}_K}_q([0,K\pi]_{-\alpha})=I^{B}_{q}(g_q)\) with \[g_q({\boldsymbol\lambda},K)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{K\pi}}\int_{[0,K\pi]_{-\alpha}}\sum^{\left\lfloor q/2\right\rfloor}_{\ell=0} b_{q-2\ell}a_{2\ell}(h(s,\cdot)^{\otimes q-2\ell}\otimes h^{\prime}(s,\cdot)^{\otimes 2\ell})({\boldsymbol\lambda})v_K(s)ds,\] and \({\boldsymbol\lambda}=(\lambda_1,\dots,\lambda_q)\). Using the isometric property of the stochastic integral, we have \[h(s,\cdot)^{\otimes p}\otimes_n h(t,\cdot)^{\otimes p} =\overline{r}_K(s,t)^{n}\cdot h(s,\cdot)^{\otimes p-n}\otimes h(t,\cdot)^{\otimes p-n}.\] Similar formulas hold for the terms which include \(h^{\prime}\). More precisely, by the isometric property, they give factors that are powers of \(\text{cov}(\overline{T}_K(s),\mathcal {T}^{\prime}_K(t))=:\widetilde{r}^{\,\prime}_K(s,t)\) or \(\text{cov}(\overline{T}^\prime_K(s),\mathcal {T}^{\prime}_K(t))=:\widetilde{r}^{\,\prime\prime}_K(s,t)\). Therefore \[\begin{gathered} \|g_q(K)\|^2_2= \frac{1}{K\pi}\int_{[0,K\pi]_{-\alpha}}\int_{[0,K\pi]_{-\alpha}}v_K(s)v_K(t)\sum^{q/2}_{\ell=0}\sum^{q/2}_{\ell^\prime=0} b_{q-2\ell}b_{q-2\ell^\prime}a_{2\ell}a_{2\ell^\prime}\\ \cdot\overline{r}_K(s,t)^{q-2(\ell\vee\ell^\prime)}{\widetilde{r}^{\,\prime\prime}_K(s,t)}^{2(\ell\wedge\ell^\prime)} {\widetilde{r}^{\,\prime}_K(s,t)}^{2(\ell\vee\ell^\prime)-2(\ell\wedge\ell^\prime)}ds\; dt, \end{gathered}\] Where \(x\vee y = \sup(x,y)\) and \(x\wedge y = \inf (x,y)\). It is quite tedious to write down the contractions and their norms, but the resulting integrals are quite similar. Let us do it for the case \(n=1\) and \(q\) odd (so that \(q-2\ell>0\)), we have \[\begin{gathered} \|g_q\otimes_1 g_q(K)\|^2_2= \frac{1}{(K\pi)^2}\int_{[0,K\pi]_{-\alpha}}\int_{[0,K\pi]_{-\alpha}}\int_{[0,K\pi]_{-\alpha}}\int_{[0,K\pi]_{-\alpha}} \;ds\;dt\;ds^\prime\;dt^\prime\\ v_K(s)v_K(t)v_K(s^\prime)v_K(t^\prime)\sum^{q/2}_{\ell,\ell^\prime=0}\sum^{q/2}_{k,k^\prime=0} b_{q-2\ell}b_{q-2\ell^\prime}a_{2\ell}a_{2\ell^\prime}b_{q-2k}b_{q-2k^\prime}a_{2k}a_{2k^\prime}\\ \cdot\overline{r}_K(s,t)\overline{r}_K(s^\prime,t^\prime) \overline{r}_K(s,s^\prime)^{q-2(\ell\vee\ell^\prime)-1}{\widetilde{r}^{\,\prime\prime}_K(s,s^\prime)}^{2(\ell\wedge\ell^\prime)} {\widetilde{r}^{\,\prime}_K(s,s^\prime)}^{2(\ell\vee\ell^\prime)-2(\ell\wedge\ell^\prime)}\\ \cdot\overline{r}_K(t,t^\prime)^{q-2(k\vee k^\prime)-1}{\widetilde{r}^{\,\prime\prime}_K(t,t^\prime)}^{2(k\wedge k^\prime)} {\widetilde{r}^{\,\prime}_K(t,t^\prime)}^{2(k\vee k^\prime)-2(k\wedge k^\prime)}. \end{gathered}\] Observe that in the general case, the exponent of \(\overline{r}_K(s,t)\) and \(\overline{r}_K(s^{\prime},t^{\prime})\) is \(n\), but the sum of the exponents in the factors involving \((s,t),(s,s^\prime)\), and in those involving \((s^\prime,t^\prime),(t,t^\prime)\), is \(q\) (the total sum of the exponents is \(2q\)). Now, we have to take the limit as \(K\to\infty\). In the case of \(\|g_q\|^2_2\), since \(I^B_q\) is an isometry, it follows that \[\|g_q\|^2_2=\mbox{\rm Var}\left(I^{\overline{T}_K}_{q}\left([0,K\pi]_{-\alpha}\right)\right)\to_{K\to\infty}\sigma^2_q(0)>0.\] Now, we consider the limit of \(\|g_q\otimes_ng_q\|^2_2\) as \(K\to\infty\). Since, the \(v_K\) are bounded by Equation [\[eq:vK2\]](#eq:vK2){reference-type="eqref" reference="eq:vK2"} and Inequalities [\[cota:supr\]](#cota:supr){reference-type="eqref" reference="cota:supr"}, the sums have a finite fixed number of terms and the \(a\), \(b\) coefficients are constant, the important ingredients are the covariances. We split the domain of integration into two parts: a tubular neighborhood of radio \(\eta\) around the diagonal \(s=t=s^\prime=t^\prime\) and its complement. Therefore, we have: we assume that \(|t-s|<\eta,|t^\prime-s^\prime|<\eta,|t^\prime-t|<\eta\) and \(|s^\prime-s|<\eta\). The covariances are bounded, in absolute value, from above by constants, for instance \[\left|\text{cov}\left(\overline{T}_K(s),\mathcal{T}_{K}'(t)\right)\right|=\frac{1}{V_K(s)V_K(t)v_K(t)} \left|\partial_t r_K(s,t)-\frac{c_K^\prime(2t)}{2V^2_K(t)}r_K(s,t)\right|,\] with \(r_K(s,t)=\textonehalf(c_K(\tau)+c_K(\sigma))\). At \(\tau=0\) we have \(c_K(0)=1\), \(c^\prime_K(0)=0\) and \(c^{\prime\prime}_K(0)=-\frac{(K+1)(2K+1)}{6K^2}\), thus, by continuity the terms involving \(\tau\) are bounded. The remaining quantities are easily seen to be bounded by Lemma [\[cotabaf\]](#cotabaf){reference-type="ref" reference="cotabaf"} and Inequalities [\[cota:supr\]](#cota:supr){reference-type="eqref" reference="cota:supr"} and [\[cota:supvar\]](#cota:supvar){reference-type="eqref" reference="cota:supvar"}. Therefore, the integral is bounded by a constant times the volume of the tubular neighborhood of the diagonal. Such volume is proportional to \(K\pi\). In conclusion, the \(1/(K\pi)^2\) is not compensated by the integral, so the upper bound for the integral in the formula for the norm of the contraction (restricted to the neighborhood of the diagonal) tends to zero. In the rest of the proof of the CLT, \(C\) stands for some constant whose actual value is meaningless, but not depending on \(K\). We may assume that at least one of the following \(|t-s|>\eta\), \(|t^{\prime}-s^{\prime}|>\eta\), \(|t^{\prime}-t|>\eta\), \(|s^{\prime}-s|>\eta\) holds true. By Inequalities [\[cota:supr\]](#cota:supr){reference-type="eqref" reference="cota:supr"} and [\[cota:supvar\]](#cota:supvar){reference-type="eqref" reference="cota:supvar"}, the (absolute value of the) covariances \(\overline{r}\), \(\widetilde{r}^{\,\prime}\) and \(\widetilde{r}^{\,\prime\prime}\) at \(x,y\) are bounded from above by \(C(1/|x-y|+1/|x+y|)\) when \(|x-y|>\eta\). Therefore, the product in the integrand of \(\|g_q\otimes_ng_q\|^2_2\) is bounded by the product of \(1/|t-s|+1/|t+s|\), \(1/|t^\prime-s^\prime|+1/|t^\prime+s^\prime|\), \(1/|s-s^\prime|+1/|s+s^\prime|\) and \(1/|t-t^\prime|+1/|t-t^\prime|\). Each one of these factors appears in the bound if the distance between the corresponding variables is larger than \(\eta\). Otherwise, we bound them by constant as in the previous case. Furthermore, the exponents of the covariances involving \(s,t\) and \(s^\prime,t^\prime\) is \(n=1,\dots,q-1\), the sum of the exponents in the factors involving \(s,s^\prime\) is \(q-n=1,\dots q-1\geq 1\), and the sum of the exponents in the factors involving \(t,t^\prime\) also is \(q-n\geq 1\). Let us consider one of the possible cases, the others are similar. Say that \(n=1\), \(|t-s|>\eta\), \(|t^{\prime}-s^{\prime}|<\eta\), \(|t^{\prime}-t|<\eta\) and \(|s^{\prime}-s|<\eta\), call \(A\) the set of points verifying these inequalities. We bound the covariances involving the variables \(t^\prime,s^\prime\); \(t^\prime,t\); and \(s^\prime,s\) in the integrand by constants. Then, the integrand is bounded by \[\begin{gathered} C\int_A\left[\frac{1}{\tau}+\frac{1}{\sigma}\right]\;ds\;dt\;ds^\prime\;dt^\prime\\ =C\int_A\frac{1}{\tau}\;d\tau\;dt\;ds^\prime\;dt^\prime +C\int_A\frac{1}{\sigma}\;d\sigma\;dt\;ds^\prime\;dt^\prime\\ \leq C\log(K\pi)\int_{A_{-1}}\;dt\;ds^\prime\;dt^\prime \end{gathered}\] where \(\tau=t-s\), \(\sigma=t+s\) and \(A_{-1}=\{(t,s^\prime,t^\prime):|t^\prime-s^\prime|<\eta,|t^\prime-t|<\eta,|s^\prime-s|<\eta\}\). Now, the volume of \(A_{-1}\) is bounded by the volume of the tubular neighborhood of the diagonal of radius \(\sqrt{3}\eta\), its volume is bounded by constant times \(K\pi\), the result follows. Thus, the integral is bounded by a constant times \(\log(K\pi)K\pi\), divided by \((K\pi)^2\), it tends to zero. Putting together both parts we conclude that \(\|g_q\otimes_ng_q\|^2_2\to 0\) as \(K\to\infty\) for \(n=1,\dots,q-1\). Therefore, \(I^{\overline{T}_K}_q\) converges in distribution to a Gaussian random variable as \(K\to\infty\) for all \(q\). Since, the \(I^{\overline{T}_K}_{q}([0,K\pi]_{-\alpha})\) are orthogonal, by Theorem [\[PeTu\]](#PeTu){reference-type="ref" reference="PeTu"} and Lemma [\[conv:var\]](#conv:var){reference-type="ref" reference="conv:var"}, their \(Q\)-th partial sum converges in distribution, as \(K\) grows to infinity, to a Gaussian random variable with variance \(\sum^{Q}_{1}\mbox{\rm Var}\left(I^{X}_q\left([0,K\pi]_{-\alpha}\right)\right)\), therefore \[\frac{N_{\overline{T}_K}([0,K\pi]_{-\alpha})-\mathbb E\left(N_{\overline{T}_K}([0,K\pi]_{-\alpha})\right)}{\sqrt{K\pi}}=\sum^{\infty}_{q=1}I^{\overline{T}_K}_{q}([0,K\pi]_{-\alpha})\] converges in distribution to a Gaussian random variable with variance \(V^2=\sum^{\infty}_{q=1}\mbox{\rm Var}\left(I^{X}_q\left([0,K\pi]_{-\alpha}\right)\right)\). (It is well known that if \(\mu_n\to\mu_\infty\), \(\sigma_n\to\sigma_\infty\), \(X_n\sim N(\mu_n,\sigma^2_n)\) then \(X_n\Rightarrow X_\infty\).) Finally, reasoning as in Lemma [\[lemma:truncar\]](#lemma:truncar){reference-type="ref" reference="lemma:truncar"}, note that \[\lim_{K\to\infty}\mbox{\rm Var}\left(I^{X}_q\left([0,K\pi]_{-\alpha}\right)\right)=\lim_{K\to\infty}\mbox{\rm Var}\left(I^{X}_q\left([0,K\pi]\right)\right)=\sigma^{2}_{q}(0).\] This proves the Theorem. # Proofs of the Lemmas {#proofs} # Notation table ----------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ \(T_K(t)\) see [\[f:tk\]](#f:tk){reference-type="eqref" reference="f:tk"} \(N_Z(I)\) number of zeroes of process \(Z\) on \(I\) \(V\) limit variance in Theorem [\[main\]](#main){reference-type="ref" reference="main"} \(T(t)\) see Corollary [\[cor\]](#cor){reference-type="ref" reference="cor"} \(r(s,t)\) covariance of \(T(.)\) \(sc(x)\) \(\sin(x)/x\) \(X_k(t)\) see ([\[Xk\]](#Xk){reference-type="ref" reference="Xk"}) \(\widetilde T_K(t)\), \(\widetilde X_K(t),\) see( [\[f:tt\]](#f:tt){reference-type="ref" reference="f:tt"}) \(C_K(t)\) see( [\[cK\]](#cK){reference-type="ref" reference="cK"}) \(r_K(s,t)\) see( [\[rK\]](#rK){reference-type="ref" reference="rK"}) \(V^2_K(t)\) \(r_K(t,t)\) \(\tau\) \(s-t\) \(\sigma\) \(s+t\) \(\overline{T}_K(t)\) see( [\[def\]](#def){reference-type="ref" reference="def"}) \(\overline{r}_K(s,t)\) see([\[barr\]](#barr){reference-type="ref" reference="barr"}) \(\overline{r}(s,t)\) see([\[limitscbar\]](#limitscbar){reference-type="ref" reference="limitscbar"}) \(B\) Brownian motion \(\gamma_K(t,\lambda)\) see([\[f:gam\]](#f:gam){reference-type="ref" reference="f:gam"}) \(h_K(t,\cdot)\) \(\gamma_K(t,\cdot)/V_K(t)\) \(\mathcal T^{\prime}_K(s)\) see( [\[f:cal\]](#f:cal){reference-type="ref" reference="f:cal"} \(a_k\), \(b_k\) see([\[f:akbk\]](#f:akbk){reference-type="ref" reference="f:akbk"}) \(f_q(x,y)\) see ([\[f:fq\]](#f:fq){reference-type="ref" reference="f:fq"}) \(I^{\overline{T}_K}_{q}\left([0,K\pi]_{-{\alpha}}\right)\) see( [\[f:iqtk\]](#f:iqtk){reference-type="ref" reference="f:iqtk"}) \(\varphi\),\(\varphi_\eta\) density of the \(N(0,1)\), \(N(0,\eta)\) \(N_{\overline{T}_K}(u,I)\) number of crossings of \(u\) by \(\overline{T}_K\) in the interval \(I\) \(N^{\eta}_{\overline{T}_K,\alpha}\) see ([\[Nsigma\]](#Nsigma){reference-type="ref" reference="Nsigma"}) \(C\) some constant with meaningless value \(v^2(t)\) see ([\[var:Tprime\]](#var:Tprime){reference-type="ref" reference="var:Tprime"}) ----------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

{'timestamp': '2015-02-09T02:08:37', 'yymm': '1401', 'arxiv_id': '1401.5745', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5745'}

# Introduction General Game Playing  might be considered the first successful project, aiming at development of multi-game playing agents. With GGP courses being taught at universities, annual competitions and hundreds of publications, it is slowly making it's way as one of key fields in the AI domain. Perhaps the most exciting thing about GGP is the versatility-a GGP agent is assumed to learn a particular game and conduct a play based solely on a rule sheet, often under demanding time constraints. No human intervention is allowed.\ However, the flexibility comes at a price. No universal method of automatically conducting efficient computations based on the rule sheet exists. In the era of customizing the hardware to meet the needs of a problem, attempting heavy computations on a system, whose performance is far behind human-written code, seems largely missed. Fast pace of GGP matches also discourages development of thorough systems. It is usually the case that only simple, statistical data about the game is gathered. GGP agents rely on the recently developed MCTS technique . Intense research in the field of MCTS-based computer Go allowed to, while breaking record after record, create agents of highly professional skill . Such phenomenon did not occur in GGP, despite the same underlying MCTS method.\ This thesis addresses the aforementioned issues. A revised scheme  of translating GDL game rules sheets to C++ code is evaluated and compared with other, existing methods. Spatial feature-based knowledge, inspired by that employed in computer Go , is proposed for games featuring generalized boards. Evolutionary knowledge mining algorithm, allowing to find the features and fine-tune agent's parameters, completes the proposed approach.\ As the ability to generate efficient reasoning machines on-the-fly is crucial for GGP, such methods are constantly researched. The existing include: usage of Prolog engines, translation to OCaml  or C++ source code, game instantiation , Propositional Networks . The last two give good results but, due to time and memory complexity, are currently limited to simple games only. Translation to source code seems promising in the long run; for that reason, this thesis introduces a small change to Game Description Language, bringing it closer to Datalog. With said change, the code generation approach will be simplified, and C++ code generation can be reevaluated.\ The state-of-the-art methods of extracting game knowledge from expert plays in Go rely on matching moves with various formations on the board. Those formations usually constitute piece arrangements, or express certain characteristics of a move, easily perceived by human players. The characteristics share essentially one thing: they rely on the concept of a board. Although experimental methods of automatic recognition of board structures and metrics in GGP exist , it seems the best to supply board information as meta data directly in the rule sheet, written in GDL itself. Such extension to GDL will be proposed, along with a system of a few spatial features and meta facts, definable on an arbitrary game board. They will aid in abstracting information about intended moves, and can be applied in the Go-like fashion to GGP.\ To generate meaningful, self-play game records, an evolutionary algorithm based on SGA  will be introduced. It will aid in developing various agent parameters and iteratively mining features. The computations are targeted for small clusters, as many matches are expected to be carried in the process. To run the evolutionary algorithm, time constrains have to be greatly relaxed.\ The approach is rather complex. Evaluation required implementing many tools; thus, GGP Spatium, a C++/Python GGP framework has been created. Because of a tepid interpretation of some limitations imposed by the GGP specification, GGP Spatium with it's capabilities constitutes also a testbed for general problem-solvers. It can be used to take advantage of the vast number of GGP resources (rule sheets, game servers, various agents, etc.) in otherwise not related research.\ This thesis is constructed in the following way: Chapter [2](#chap:sota){reference-type="ref" reference="chap:sota"} will summarize recent techniques in multi-game playing, focusing on MCTS with knowledge, also in computer Go. Chapter [3](#chap:problem){reference-type="ref" reference="chap:problem"} will define the problem considered in this thesis. In Chapter [4](#chap:keyIdeas){reference-type="ref" reference="chap:keyIdeas"}, the approach created for this thesis to answer the problem will be presented. Chapter [5](#chap:testingPlatform){reference-type="ref" reference="chap:testingPlatform"} will summarize technical details of GGP Spatium-the implementation of said approach. Finally, results obtained during tests will be presented in Chapter [6](#chap:tests){reference-type="ref" reference="chap:tests"}, with Chapter [7](#chap:summary){reference-type="ref" reference="chap:summary"} concluding the thesis. # GGP/MCTS and Artificial Intelligence {#chap:sota} In this chapter, an overview of state of the art in artificial intelligence in games is presented. The chapter begins with a brief history of AI. The main focus is on multi-game playing, and utilization of Monte Carlo methods supported with game knowledge in conducting plays. While the scope is narrowed to notable work relevant to the subject, a broader view on AI game playing, yet still concise, can be found in .\ ## AI Game Playing The idea of artificial intelligence comes from the 50s, and is nearly as old as computer science itself. The natural approach to research in the field of AI was to break up the problem into simpler and smaller ones. This is how AI game playing, among the other AI-related ones, emerged as a problem. Academic research focused mainly on developing one-game programs for board games like chess, checkers, variations of Tic-tac-toe, or later Go.\ It is not clear when the rise in artificial intelligence in games happened. However, for many, it is the year 1997, when Deep Blue, IBM's supercomputer with both software and hardware dedicated to playing chess, won with then world master Garry Kasparov.\ ## Multi-Game Playing First notable Meta-Game Playing (Multi-Game Playing) systems come from the first half of the 1990s. The term itself was coined by Barney Pell , though at the time, he was not the only one interested in the subject. Early Multi-Game Playing systems like SAL or Hoyle  were designed to play two-player, perfect-information board games -- the kind that fits well with minimax tree searching scheme, which was then the state of the art method.\ No popular framework was available until the year 2005, when General Game Playing (GGP) originated at Stanford University. The whole idea of GGP revolves around a single document , created and maintained by the Stanford Logic Group, which covers important technical details such as: - Game Description Language (GDL) for describing general games, - architecture of a General Game Playing System, - mechanics of a single play, - communication protocol. GGP is continuously gaining popularity, largely due to the aforementioned standardization, and also active popularization in form of frequent, open competitions. The most prominent one, the AAAI Competition , is an annual competition which features a large money prize and gathers enthusiasts and scientists. Yet another factor, that contributed to GGP's success, is it's timing -- the system has been created almost in parallel with development of the UCT algorithm, applicable to a wide class of problems, and flexible in applying modifications such as utilization of various forms of game knowledge.\ Although GGP systems are meant to learn the game, they usually do not do that. Designed to collect and immediately use ad-hoc data about the game, they rarely improve on previous plays, because the game is assumed not likely to appear again. For instance, rather than to keep game-specific data between consecutive plays,  presents the idea of knowledge transfer. It is a form of extracting \"general knowledge\" from previously conducted plays and using it in future plays with, possibly different yet unknown, games.\ Numerous different directions in research in GGP were taken; non-trivial ones include using automated theorem proving for formulating simple statements about the game, and detecting sub-games and symmetries in games . On the other hand, feature and evaluation function discovery, described in Subsection [2.5.5](#subsec:evalFuns){reference-type="ref" reference="subsec:evalFuns"}, is popular among the top GGP agents. There are many ideas for enhancing the players by analyzing game rules, but they all seem to share one flaw: their impact is hard to evaluate, as many a time they tend to better plays in some games while getting in the way in others.\ Of course, the ultimate panacea for game-playing programs is computational efficiency. That is why speeding up the key components of agents also attracts significant attention, specifically efficient parallelization  and optimization of reasoning engines, described in greater detail in Section [2.7](#sec:reasoning){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:reasoning"}. ## Rollout-Based Game Playing Monte Carlo methods have been long unpopular in AI game playing, mostly because of poor results in comparison to minimax-like searching. For instance, an attempt to apply simulated annealing to Go, resulted in obtaining only a novice-level player .\ A major breakthrough came in 2006 when UCT , a rollout-based Monte Carlo planning algorithm, was proposed and successfully applied to Go . Later, UCT was generalized to a new tree-search method named Monte Carlo Tree Search .\ To understand what makes UCT stand out, UCB1 has to be introduced beforehand. ### UCB1 and UCT {#subsec:ucb} UCB1 is a policy proposed as a solution to the following problem, formulated during World War II:\ *Suppose we have a \(k\)-armed bandit; each arm (lever) pays out with an unknown distribution. What strategy should be used to maximize the payout of multiple pulls?*\ The problem is also known as an exploration/exploitation dilemma, question of a philosophical origin, quite similar to the famous secretary problem .\ UCB states for Upper Confidence Bound. As the name suggests, UCB1 policy  gives an upper bound on expected regret (which occurs when not pulling the optimal lever). More specifically, for a \(k\)-armed bandit with arms of arbitrary reward distributions \(P_1,\ldots,P_k\) with support in \([0;1]\), the expected regret after \(n\) pulls is bounded by \[\left[ 8 \sum_{i:\mu_1<\mu^*}\left( \frac{\ln n}{\Delta_i} \right) \right] +\left(1+\frac{\pi^2}{3} \right)\left(\sum^k_{j=1}\Delta_j\right) ,\] where \(\mu_1,\ldots\mu_k\) are the expected values of \(P_1,\ldots,P_k\) and \(\mu^*\) is any maximal element in \(\left\{\mu_1,\ldots,\mu_k\right\}\).\ The natural strategy, when having some information about the levers, would be to pull the most promising one constantly. Let \(I=\left\{1,\ldots,k\right\}\) be the set of lever's indexes. The lever to be pulled in turn \(k\) is being determined by the following formula \[\label{eq:ucb} argmax_{i\in I}\left( v_i + C \sqrt{\frac{\ln n_p}{n_i}}\right),\] where \(v_i\) denotes an average payoff associated with lever \(i\), \(n_p\) is the total number of pulls and \(n_i\) is the number of pulls on lever \(i\). The expression \(\sqrt{\frac{\ln n_p}{n_i}}\) is called the UCB bonus. It's purpose is to accumulate over time for long ignored levers. With the Formula [\[eq:ucb\]](#eq:ucb){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:ucb"}, the most promising lever is being chosen.\ UCT stands for UCB1 Applied to Trees. It is an anytime heuristic for making decisions by the analysis of decision trees. The algorithm works in a loop, where each iteration consists of three phases: shallow-search, random simulation and back-propagation. Additionally, each iteration marks a path from the tree root to a leaf, and back to the root again.\ During the shallow search, next node is being selected using the UCB1 policy. Each node is being treated as a \(k\)-armed bandit, with it's children being the levers.\ UCB1 is being used to select the most promising node. When the maximum depth is reached, a random simulation takes place from the chosen node to a leaf. Next up, a value of the leaf is back-propagated as a payoff for selected arms, that is, all the selected moves on the path from the current game state. ### Monte Carlo Tree Search Monte Carlo Tree Search is a generalization of UCT, where the shallow-search phase (called a selection phase) strategy follows a *selection strategy* like UCB1, but not necessarily.\ The class of problems for which MCTS performs well is not yet thoroughly investigated, as it is dependent on the chosen selection strategy. Because of it's probabilistic nature, it is generally not suitable for single player deterministic games, which are essentially search problems. It performs well for a wide variety of other ones, specifically in dynamic environments. It should be noted that bare MCTS, or even UCT variant of tree search, needs to be fine-tuned to a problem.\ Recent applications of MCTS to continuous, real-time environments with no easily distinguishable end states, give promising results, i.e. to Ms. Pac-Man  or Tron . Another notable application of MCTS was obtaining automatic discretization of a continuous domain in Texas Holdem flavor of Poker . ## The Game Description Language AI or random driven, almost every turn-based game playing agent has the logic component (also called the reasoner). It enables i.e. inference of consecutive game states or legal move sets. The reasoner has to be efficient, for it utilizes a great share of computational power through repeated switching of game states during a single play.\ The most straightforward solution for a multi-game player would be to generate the logic component on the fly, based on game rules. GGP uses Game Description Language for this purpose . GDL, a variant of Datalog, which is again a subset of Prolog, uses first-order logic for describing games. The class of games coverable by GDL[^1] contains all finite, sequential, deterministic and perfect information games. In other words, the language describes any game for which a finite state automaton exists, where the automaton state corresponds to a single game state; a sample automaton is presented in Figure [\[fig:ga\]](#fig:ga){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:ga"}.\ It is obvious that, due to the combinatorial explosion of their sizes, bare or even compressed automatons as structures are not feasible for passing information about the game. Therefore GDL is being used to define the automaton, by providing initial/terminal states and the transition function.\ While GDL is defined in terms of syntax and semantics, KIF  has been chosen to provide the syntax. KIF specification covers technical details, i.e. it provides a syntax in the modified BNF notation and defines the allowed charset. Sample excerpts from GDL rule sheets are presented in Subsection [2.7.1](#subsec:prolog){reference-type="ref" reference="subsec:prolog"}.\ GDL rule sheets are, in a way, closely mimicking rule books used by human players. After all, real-life handbooks do not define GAs either; inference rules are written in natural language and extended with broad comments, with the rules relying on the common knowledge (like arithmetic or well-known conventions) simply omitted. ### Limitations {#subsec:limitations} For the time being, GDL can describe only finite, sequential, deterministic, and perfect information games. Though it is a wide class of problems, efforts have been made to extend it even further.\ One simple way to add a primitive support for non-deterministic games is to add a dummy random player to the game, whose only moves would be random calls separated from the rest of the game. Such player could, for instance, shuffle the cards or throw the dice. The GDL specification  states that, whenever a player fails to connect, the gamemaster should carry on supplying random moves for the absent player. This way the dummy player could serve as an interface for the gamemaster to actually make random calls. However, most of today's players \"safely\" assume, that other players are opponents, and the dummy player would certainly be considered one. This would result in distorted perception of the dummy player's move distribution. In other words, such agents might continuously expect the worse number on the dice, worse possible cards dealt, etc.\ A GDL extension has been proposed , adding a full support for both nondeterminism and information obscurity in a clear manner. The extension was a basis for GDL-II language , allowing to express games like Poker or Monopolly. It seems fairly popular[^2]; however, this publication focuses on GDL alone.\ Computer representation of continuous domains is a matter of proper quantization. The same applies to a game-state space; though without specific language constructs, simple versions of a few "continuous" games have been expressed in GDL. However, accurate implementations of such games are not yet feasible with GDL. Ms. Pac-Man's GDL version is a good example of such problem. The simplified maze used in it is depicted in Figure [\[fig:pacman\]](#fig:pacman){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:pacman"}.\ The game involves three players; one controls Pac-Man and the other two control the ghosts. The play takes place on \(8\times 8\) grid; both the player and the ghosts share the same speed of 1 square per turn. This is not the case in the real Ms. Pac-Man; the speed of ghosts varies from 40% to 95% of Pac-Man's top speed with many factors contributing , not to mention Pac-Man's speed changing as well.\ A simple approach might be to quantify the state space in such way, that the turn would change only junctions. However, with such infrequent board refresh rate, the monsters might seem as randomly changing their position, what in turn could affect the learning engine. Developing reliable Ms. Pac-Man GDL rules could result in a heavily polluted state space.\ Another shortcoming of GDL is lack of basic arithmetic. The common way of bypassing this dilemma is defining simple arithmetic operators only when necessary, as it is shown in Figure [\[fig:PrologAddition\]](#fig:PrologAddition){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:PrologAddition"}. Apart from doing unnecessary computations, it also makes the size of the overhead dependent on the data-in the example, complexity of operation \(a+b\) would be \(O(f(b))\), instead of \(O(1)\). Thus, adding large numbers might result in unexpected slowdowns, i.e. in the middle of the game, when \(b\) becomes suddenly large.\ ## GGP-Specific Knowledge The following section explores various interesting attempts of enriching GGP agents with game knowledge. The usual learning methods might not fit with GGP, either because of limited time, or uncertainty of the target game. ### Data Mining An interesting attempt has been made in order to explore the possibility of replacing game tree search algorithm completely by a decision tree in . The agent tries to gather some basic knowledge about the game by analyzing self-play history; using statistical analysis, sub-goals, crucial to winning or loosing, are being identified. Those are, in fact, just regular ground atomic sentences (facts) like `board(1,3,x)`. In the mining phase, the C4.5 Algorithm , which is an extension of the ID3 algorithm, is being used to create a sub-goal decision tree. Each sub-goal has a statistical winning ratio associated with it. The tree's job is to, for a given game state (a collection of facts) as an input, classify it to one of the outcome buckets. The approach seems to be useful for games with a high branching factor. ### Patterns Though moderately popular in AI Game Playing, pattern recognition and matching has not attracted much attention of the GGP community. Usually, patterns are hard-coded, or at least their learning is supervised; any of that is not feasible in GGP. For discovery and application of quality patterns is heavily resource consuming, the documented attempts are simple. In  GIFL (GGP Feature Learning Algorithm) was proposed. It is an algorithm, which tries to find patterns described as predicate sets with associated moves and expected outcomes. GIFL finds two types of patterns: offensive and defensive, which are correlated with success and failure, respectively.\ GIFL is based on random playouts. Whenever a move \(M\) leads from state \(S_{i}\) to a winning, terminal state \(S_t\) with payout \(p_{S_t}\), state \(S_i\) is being examined. Facts are being removed from that state, one at a time, and after every removal, the agent checks if applying move \(M\) still guarantees payout equal to \(p_{S_t}\).\ This way, the algorithm approximates the minimal subset of predicates that contributes to winning. Patterns are also being recognized in other states along the path in similar fashion, though they are being weighted according to the formula: \[100\cdot V^{level-1},\] where \(V\) is an empirically set constant, and \(level\) denotes the state's level in the tree. ### Payout Association The easiest approach, and perhaps the most natural one (considering representation of games in GGP), is associating statistical quality values with facts. For instance, CadiaPlayer utilizes the Move-Average Sampling Technique , where an action lookup table holds \(\mathcal{Q}_h(a)\) value for each encountered move. It is an average payout of game during which the move was made. The values are updated with each subsequent playout. The rationale is to identify profitable actions, independent from game states.\ Similar approach was taken in , albeit move payout was also dependent on a position during the simulation. Simply speaking, for board games with homogeneous pieces, this technique allows to discover the most favorable positions. The mentioned paper also explored a similar concept of evaluating facts, describing game states.\ Those simple ideas are not always new; in fact, some of them have been reused, as good enough for GGP. For instance, in 1993 Brügmann  described a Monte Carlo scheme for evaluating possible moves. ### Recognition of Boards and Metrics {#subsec:boardDiscovery} As already mentioned in Subsection [6.2.1](#subsec:mgdlTest){reference-type="ref" reference="subsec:mgdlTest"}, GDL lacks basic arithmetic and, in consequence, obscures relations between different components of the game, that are naturally perceived by human players. A prime example of such connection is a concept of a board. It is absent in GDL; without it, facts which describe the board are mixed with those which describe temporary scores, count moves, etc. and form a loosely coupled set. But perceiving a board requires perceiving the distances between the pieces, and that is where having a metric defined is crucial. It is matter of discussion if tying facts together to form an abstract structure would be particularly useful, especially for games that do not feature a rectangular board, or even any board or pieces at all. Despite that, some of the top GGP agents use techniques of inference of metric features and even primitive recognition of board-like structures.\ One notable approach was taken in , later used also in . It consisted of identifying syntactic structures through analysis of game rule sheet. All ternary predicates have been assumed to describe two dimensional boards of a grid structure. More specifically, each ternary predicate described a board under one condition. Two arguments were assumed to be the coordinates and one to be the piece. The condition was that one of the arguments could never have two different values simultaneously (what would mean that there are two different pieces occupying the same field). The property also allowed to assume which argument was the one describing the field, and was verified by running self-play simulations.\ Kaiser  used a similar approach of discovering board-like structures through self-play. Facts were grouped by relation, based on their functor/arity, i.e. `cell/3` formed a single group. All constants were labeled with unique numbers. Each relation's argument position (in case of `cell/3` there are three) was examined in terms of variance throughout the game. Retaining the values throughout the game would yield a 0 variance, contrary to frequently changing the values from state to state, referred to as mobility. Lastly, a motion detection heuristic settled which mobile arguments qualified as those denoting the pieces. The approach works best with rule sheets denoting empty fields in states, common in games where player moves a piece (chess, checkers) rather than puts a new one (Tic-tac-toe, Othello).\ The aforementioned papers note that, due to unpredictable ordering and obfuscation of predicates describing the board, those cannot be recognized by simply following naming patterns like `(cell ? ? ?)`. However, they may constitute a light an easy to implement alternative. Apparently, this approach is not universal as it relies heavily on the GDL representation of the game. Again, this is a clear shortage of GDL, since basic metadata supplied with a rule sheet would rule out all the potential errors from badly recognized metrics. Board-like structures are typically used in conjunction with metrics. Below are presented a few examples of such, coming from different contexts.\ Manhattan distance on the board was used in  as a way to obtain new state features. Two kinds of features were proposed: - Manhattan distance between each pair of pieces, - sum of pair-wise Manhattan distances. Yet another idea was used in . It suggested "proving" the metric by analysis of game rules. By inspecting relations between fluents, distance between two arbitrary predicates may be obtained (in terms of turns), that is, how many turns have to pass between the last occurrence of one term and the first one of the other. Taking chess for example, fact `board(8,1,rook)` can be obtained from `board(1,1,rook)` with a single move, whereas `board(8,8,rook)` requires at least two moves. The distances were calculated using the formula \[\delta(s,f)=\frac{\Delta(s,f)}{\Delta_{max}(f)},\] where \(\Delta(s,f)\) denotes a shortest distance between a fluent \(f\) and any of the fluents in state \(s\), while \(\Delta_{max}(f)\) is the longest possible distance \(\Delta(s,f)\) that is not infinite. The paper states that this type of metric is always possible to obtain but not always feasible due to memory-and time-consuming computations.\ The impact of such a metric on the computations may be harder to foresee. In example, an introductory chess tutorial  suggests keeping the rooks close to the board center. The concept of a center relies on the Euclidean metric; it could be defined as a place equally distant from the boundaries. The definition of the board center through the "rook metric" however is not that straightforward. Of course at present, no real algorithm relies on tips written in natural language, albeit some designers of algorithms do.\ proposed the *symbol distance*, an interesting way of capturing relations that follow syntactical patterns. Simply put, each binary relation is assumed to introduce an ordering of involved object constants through an undirected graph: - each object constant \(c\) creates a vertex \(v_a\), - two constants bound together with a functor (like `rel(c,d)`) introduce an edge \(\{v_c,v_d\}\), - the distance is defined as the shortest path between the corresponding vertices. The approach works very well with predicates like `succ`: (succ 1 2) (succ 2 3) (succ 3 4) ... (cell 1 2 b) (cell 3 4 b) Finally, the distance between fluents is a sum of distances between object constants on positions identified as distance-relevant. In the above example, if only the first two arguments would be identified as positional arguments, then the distance between `(cell 1 2 b)` and `(cell 2 4 b)` would be equal to the sum of the shortest paths \(v_1\rightsquigarrow v_3\) and \(v_2\rightsquigarrow v_4\), which would be \(2+2=4\). ### Evaluation Functions {#subsec:evalFuns} The point of using UCT in AI Game Playing is to have a generic way to evaluate game states. However, having a quality evaluation function at hand can lead to better performance of a UCT player. Experiments carried in , where UCT algorithm was fitted nearly as a replacement for a minimax engine in the Game of Amazons agent, yielded a twofold benefit. Firstly, evaluation function can save time on random simulations-intermediate states evaluated with high certainty can be treated like terminal states. However, as the paper underlines, it might not pay off to evaluate every state along the path. Evaluation function might be used just once after a certain number of moves (counted from beginning of the game, or the beginning of the simulation). The second benefit is the ability to do forward pruning in games having great branching factor, where a high percentage of poorly evaluated moves might be discarded from building the initial UCT tree.\ A few of the leading GGP Agents incorporate different ideas for generating evaluation functions . The first one, for instance, scored game rules' atoms with fuzzy logic, so they could serve as a basis for scoring complicated formulas. However, neither of them used UCT, as the corresponding agents were equipped with iterative-deepening depth-first-search algorithms.\ Lastly, an interesting approach was taken in , where a neural network was utilized for state evaluation. A propositional domain theory, obtained from the game description, was passed to \(C-IL^2P\) algorithm , which returned a ready-to-use network. The approach has been further improved in . ## MCTS with Knowledge {#sec:goKnowledge} Recent Go playing agents, which leverage MCTS, are a great resource for pattern recognition and matching methods, tailored specifically to Monte Carlo simulations. Those agents give a good overview of what can be expected of pattern systems in terms of design, usage and performance. Though most of the ideas from Go are not generally applicable to every game, as they are mostly based on expert games and specific Go features, knowledge-free research in that area has been also carried.\ Suiting MCTS to one particular game gives a finer control over minor tweaks to the MCTS method. Kloetzer et al.  summarized (the paper includes further references) the typical improvements as: - using knowledge in the random games, - changing the behavior of UCT or using other techniques in the tree-search part, - changing the behavior at the final decision of the move, by pruning moves. In the following sections, selected state-of-the-art approaches to refining MCTS are presented. Figure [\[fig:go-quality\]](#fig:go-quality){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:go-quality"} shows some of the results obtained by programs utilizing similar methods. ### Features and Spatial Patterns Many mature examples of pattern exploration and matching come from chess and Go, games complicated enough, to resist any "lighter" computational intelligence methods. Both were, and still are, challenging. Patterns usually consist of spatial arrangements of pieces or game-specific features.\ In 2002,  noted, that mimicking human pattern skills seems out of reach on modern hardware, for the computational power required for efficient processing of patterns during game play is too great a burden. Only simple patterns are feasible to explore.\ \(3\times 3\) spatial patterns, being a reasonable trade-off between size and carried information, are popular among Go researchers . Such patterns are usually piece arrangements on a \(3\times 3\) area around the field where a move is to be made. There are roughly \(3^8\) of those (with extra patterns for moves close to the edges).  report a significant improvement when using \(3\times 3\) patterns, and the latter suggests future increase in the size of patterns as greater computational power and memory sizes will become available.\ Similar approach, inspired by solutions from Moyo Go Studio  and others, was taken in , where patterns were also build around the field where a move was to be made. Nested sequences of patterns were considered, ordered by their sizes. Simply speaking, the larger the matched patterns (in terms of number of fields), the greater predictive power was associated with it. The smallest patterns were matched last, as the most universal and least predictive ones. Additional local features, bit-coded, were also added to the patterns. Those were mostly Go-specific, but a distance of the move to the board edge was also included.\ In  application of the common, K-nearest-neighbor pattern representation to Go was investigated. Again, the pattern was build around the field where a move was to be made, and the \(k\) nearest fields to it (in respect to the Euclidean metric), that contained game pieces or board edges were relevant to the pattern and stored. The Bayesian properties of patterns were used to filter out meaningless ones: pattern \(p\) was kept in the database if \(P(i|p) > 0.01\), where \(P(i|p)\) is the probability of playing a move on intersection \(i\), provided pattern \(p\) matches on \(i\). A corpus of 2000 professional players' 19 x 19 Go games has been analyzed in order to mine significant spatial features. The generated databases (varying in size from 8,000 to 85,000 for \(k\) from 6 to 15) were used in the Indigo Go program.\ Among the popular features used in Go agents, that do not rely on Go-specific knowledge, are distance of piece to the nearest board edges, distance to the last move, and the move before the last move. All three rely on the Euclidean metric; the last two, called "proximity features", depend on locality of Go , an assumption that it usually pays out to make a move close to the intersection, where the last move was made. ### Knowledge Incorporation {#subsec:incorporation} With knowledge prepared beforehand, a simulation-based engine can be enhanced, for instance, by: - influencing probability distribution when picking next move, - using the knowledge in the expert system manner (matching a rule would result in picking a move without any randomness) - narrowing down the choice of moves, - search-free playing when no reliable simulation data is available, - relying more on knowledge than average move payouts, until the payouts become reliable. K-nearest-neighbor databases, mentioned in the previous section for the Indigo program, were used in two ways: for choosing a move in the opening, and for preselecting moves for the MC module during regular play. The latter is more relevant to the subject; during each turn, the knowledge module was used only to preselect a fairly small number \(ns\) of moves (reported \(ns=7\)) for further evaluation by the Monte Carlo module. Mined k-nearest-neighbor patterns were used to select \(nk\) best moves, leaving \(ns-nk\) to be selected by the regular knowledge module. In the experiments conducted by the authors, the best results were achieved for \(nk=2\).\ MoGo , one of the top Go players, is a great example of how UCT can make use of identified patterns. The claim presented in the paper was that the quality of random simulations is poor, because pure randomness results in mostly meaningless playouts, skewing the estimated move value. It is worth noting that the meaningless playout effect might not be that obvious in simpler games of lower branching factors. A search-free method, of matching against predefine rule set, was used during random simulations. The first matching rule selected the move: - If the last played move was an Atari (and the stones could be saved), one of the saving moves was chosen randomly. - The 8 fields surrounding the last move were compared against the encoded patterns. If some patterns were matched, one of the matching moves was chosen randomly. The patterns represented common Go formations. - Any move that captured stones on the whole board was chosen. - Finally, if all the previous heuristics failed, a truly random move was played. Progressive strategies, proposed in , aim at lowering the costs of using knowledge in Monte Carlo Tree Search and, though tested with Go, are game-independent. The first one, progressive bias, introduces a modification to the UCT formula (designations remain the same as given in Formula [\[eq:ucb\]](#eq:ucb){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:ucb"}): \[\label{formula:progressiveUCT} k=argmax_{i\in I}\left( v_i + C\sqrt{\frac{\ln n_p}{n_i}}+f(n_i)\right)\] The point is to rely on the search knowledge, while there is not enough data available from simulations. It follows from the formula that progressive bias converges over time to regular UCT.\ The second method, "progressive unpruning", tries to cope with high branching factor of tree nodes. UCT tries to be fair and, by default, initially visits each node's child at least once. For hundreds or thousands of children this might not be possible withing the given timespan. In progressive pruning, after a fixed number visits to the node, the children are being pruned, according to the domain knowledge. Afterwards, the children nodes are becoming gradually "unpruned". The scheme is depicted in Figure [\[fig:widening\]](#fig:widening){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:widening"}. Cadiaplayer employs simulations affected by the previously mentioned MAST tables of move payouts. Instead of random, the moves are chosen according to the Boltzmann distribution \[\mathcal{P}(a)=\frac{e^{\mathcal{Q}_h(a)/\tau}}{\sum^n_{b=1} e^{\mathcal{Q}_h(b)/\tau}}.\] ##### Diversity An interesting extension of the knowledge-based MCTS scheme was proposed in . The paper investigates the influence of diversity in decision making, concept taken from social studies, where a team of diverse people is believed to cope better with difficult problems than a team of highly talented, but similarly-skilled individuals. As it goes for GGP agents, a multi-agent MCTS Go system was proposed; in each playout phase, a move to be made is being suggested by a randomly chosen agent from the agent database. The agents are equipped with identical pattern and feature sets, only weighted differently. It is an interesting phenomenon, that each of those agents alone may have worse results than a diverse group of agents (that is, group of agents performing good and relatively poor). Another thing noted is, that diversity alone does not guarantee a good performance-a diverse set has to be selected carefully. Thus, a greedy algorithm was used to select such set. Even better results were obtained when the agents were initially ordered. ##### Elo rankings An inquiring idea was explored in . The author suggested that patterns, once extracted, can be further evaluated using the popular Elo ranking system . Each pattern is considered a separate contestant, and selecting a move during a play is a team win of all the participating patterns. Though patterns were obtained with an expert knowledge (game records), the learning process is game-independent. As the author suggests, the whole system can be easily extended to other games. The patterns are being used with UCT in two ways. Firstly, the most lightweight features (in terms of computation time) direct the random search phase, for they provide probability distributions for moves. Secondly, the full set of features is used to prune the Monte-Carlo Search Tree. ## GDL Reasoning Engines {#sec:reasoning} ### Prolog {#subsec:prolog} Different implementations of Prolog, due their ease of use and almost natural translation from KIF to Prolog, quickly became the standard components handling the logic part of GGP agents. The vast majority of top GGP contestants also do, or used to, handle inference with Prolog: Ary , Fluxplayer . Cadia  reports using YAP Prolog, Centurio  used \({}ECL^iPS^e\) as a base logic engine, which was further extended with generated Java reasoning code.\ The Knowledge Interchange Format specification  covers a Prolog-like, infix syntactic variant of KIF, which facilitates a mellow switch from infix to prefix notation. For example, rule (<= (legal xPlayer (play ?i ?j x)) (true (control xPlayer)) (emptyCell ?i ?j)) could be translated as legal(xPlayer, play(I, J, X)) :-state(control(xPlayer)), emptyCell(I, J). Technical details of the translation may be dependent on a particular Prolog implementation.\ Björnsson and Finnsson have created useful macros (as Prolog rules)  to simplify the communication between the Prolog engine and the agent. Exemplary rules from the set are: distinct( _x, _y ) :-_x \= _y. or( _x, _y ) :-_x; _y. or( _x, _y, _z ) :-_x; _y; _z. state_make_move( _p, _m ) :-assert( does( _p, _m ) ), bagof( A, next( A ), _l ), retract( does( _p, _m ) ), retractall( state( _ ) ), add_state_clauses( _l ). state_peek_next( _ml, _sl ) :-add_does_clauses( _ml ), bagof( A, next( A ), _l ), retractall( does( _, _ ) ), remove_duplicates( _l, _sl ). state_is_terminal :-terminal. Prolog engines are, first of all, used on a per-query basis; agent makes single queries about legal moves or next game state, provided a move \(M\) was made. It is possible to push the macro approach a little bit further, by defining a rule for a whole random simulation (that is, all the way to the terminal state), or even implementing UCT in Prolog.\ Performance of Prolog varies greatly between implementations; numerous benchmarks made on simple problems are widely available. Demoen and Nguyen  points out, however, some difficulties in comparing Prolog implementations. The advantage of one system over the others varies from test to test, and depends on the type of queries which are to be made. Though slightly out-of-date, the study revealed a few factors affecting performance: conformance to the ISO standard (which supposedly introduces an overhead), system robustness and subtle implementation details.\ The last thing to note about using Prolog is that, although fairly easy to interface, Prolog engines are terribly slow when processing GDL rule sheets in comparison to engines custom-written for a particular game.  reports a full game of Othello taking 2 seconds. In preliminary experiments carried for this publication, a single, random, 200-move game of chess took nearly 1,5s on a 2GHz processor with YAP Prolog. This is an overwhelming number[^3], and makes chess impossible to play under reasonable time constrains. ### Source Code Generation {#subsec:compilation} The set of possible queries to the logic component, given by the specification, might be considered fixed. So is the set of inference rules and possible functors given by the rule sheet. Prolog engines introduce an overhead on account of their flexibility, which allows to alter rules and facts and make various queries. On the other hand, Prolog systems are usually heavily specialized and use specific heuristics to speed up the process.\ For a particular game, a static program compiled after analysis of the games' rule sheet, should be sufficient to traverse the game automaton. A few sources note performance gains from translating GDL rule sheets to source code on a per-game basis. The code is later compiled and serves as a static query engine.\ Waugh  proposed a way of generating C++ source code for a single GDL rule sheet. For each rule and fact there was a corresponding C++ function generated. Rule's body, consisted of nested `for` loops, each loop for one literal. Because invoking a rule is essentially querying for unbound variables appearing in it's head, every query returned a list of tuples-possible values of those variables. Moreover, each function was overloaded, depending on what combination of constants and variables was to be fed as input. Two interesting optimizations were also considered: - Query memorization, in form of caching results of functions that do not depend on `does` predicates. Results of such functions remain unchanged throughout the whole game. - Reordering of literals in rules' bodies by the number of unknown variables, so that more variables would be bound in subsequent queries. Compared to YAP Prolog, reported performance gains varied between 60% and 1760%, depending on the game. As the flaws are concerned, long[^4] source code files were reported for the most complicated games, and the volume of source code influences compilation times. Additionally, performance profiling of the system revealed a huge overhead on memory management, partially due to poor memory management of used C++ Standard Library containers.\ Saffidine and Cazenave  proposed another method of translating rule sheets to OCaml source code. Rule sheets would undergo a chain of transformations from GDL to intermediate languages-variations of GDL. - By logical transformations, rules were transitioned so `distinct` predicates would never appear negated. Rules were put into Disjunctive Normal Form and divided into sub-rules at disjunctions. Obtained rules were in Mini-GDL language, a subset of GDL, yet equally expressive. - Rules were further decomposed to the normal form, in which there are at most two literals on the right hand side. Because the decomposition might have broken the safety property (which yields that every variable in a negated literal should appear in an earlier positive literal), negated literals were moved when necessary. Under an assumption that the original author of the rule sheet might have ordered the literals in an optimal way, contrary to aforementioned C++ code generation method, positive literals were not moved. Obtained rules were in Normal-GDL language. - Finally, the rule sheet underwent inversion, where each functions constant \(f\) was associated with rules possible to be triggered in it's body. Resulting rule sheet in Inverted-GDL was ready for translation to the target programming language. The authors have translated the processed rules sheet to OCaml, and interfaced it with functions interfacing the program as a GA (game automaton). Because bottom-up evaluation was chosen, the system kept a fact database and allowed for adding, searching and unifying facts. Reported performance gains of this method varied between 24% and 146% for a set of tested games. ### Propositional Automata Both approaches described in previous sections, that is using Prolog reasoning or Prolog-like reasoning with pre-compiled code, employ a top-down evaluation. Propositional Automata are somewhat similar to bottom-up evaluation trees; but instead of setting the facts and propagating the effects they have towards the root of the tree, a PA retains it's internal state between updates (turns). The input of a PA consists only of the unpredictable game facts-representing the moves of the players. The updates are triggered in transition nodes.\ A Propositional Automaton (PA)  is a representation for discrete, dynamic environments. Simply put, it allows to infer the next state of the environment from the previous one, meeting the requirements for a GGP reasoning engine. A PA is based on a simpler structure, called Propositional Network. A Propositional Network (PN) is a structure which resembles a logic circuit. It is a directed bipartite graph, nodes of which fall into one of the three categories: - boolean gates, - transitions, - propositions, further divided into: - \(P_I\)-input propositions (with no entering edges), - \(P_V\)-view propositions (with no leaving edges), - \(P_B\)-base propositions (leading connected to boolean gates and transitions). Proposition nodes correspond to facts about the environment; they take on boolean values. As for GGP, input propositions roughly correspond to `does` facts, and base propositions to the other facts taking part in the reasoning process.\ A transition node is an identity function. It serves only for synchronization purposes. During each turn, the changes propagate not from the inputs, but rather from identity nodes. In other words, a transition node serves as a dam, taming the changes until the next time slot.\ Evaluating the network is similar to evaluating a logic circuit. Assuming that the network already has a valid internal state, the input propositions are supplied with new boolean values, and transitions fire off, propagating changes throughout the network. An exemplary PN is shown in Figure [\[fig:propnet\]](#fig:propnet){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:propnet"}.\ Definition of a PN as a graph does not provide means for conducting a reasoning. For this purpose, it is being wrapped as a Propositional Automaton. A PA  is a triple \(<N, M^0_B, l>\), where \(N\) is a Propositional Network, \(M^0_B\) is an initial truth assignment, and \(l\) is a legality function mapping base truth assignments to finite sets of input truth assignments \(l:m_B\mapsto 2^{m_I}\). For GGP, initial truth assignment would be based on the initial game setup, and the legality function on the `legal` predicate.\ The formal definitions of PNs and PAs and algorithms for generating them were presented in great detail in .\ In GGP, PAs are very robust when compared to Prolog engines. Chmiel  presented a performance comparison of PAs against SWI Prolog run on the same machine. The paper also reports inability to generate PAs for more complicated games like chess and checkers, due to enormous size of their PNs. Results are presented in Figure [2.1](#tab:propnetResults){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:propnetResults"}.\ [\[tab:propnetResults\]]{#tab:propnetResults label="tab:propnetResults"} ### Game Instantiation {#subsec:instantiation} Game instantiation, that is, removing all variables from the rule sheet in such way, that the original semantics would be preserved, was proposed as an obvious way to speed up GDL inference in . The idea is based on an assumption that using variables may add unnecessary complexity, whereas processing instantiated input, which is more like brute-force searching, is actually faster. According to the conducted experiments, the factor of Prolog engine speed growth ranged from being a few times to even 250 times faster than the search on uninstantiated input.\ The algorithm is shown as Algorithm [\[alg:instantiation\]](#alg:instantiation){reference-type="ref" reference="alg:instantiation"}. The critical step of instantiation is calculation of supersets of reachable state atoms, moves and axioms. As initially proposed, this can be done using either Prolog or dependency graphs. After that, formulas are being instantiated. Some of the instantiations might actually be redundant and leading to conflicting formulas. For this reason, the reachable supersets are being post-processed, and obtained instantiations' validity is being checked. An extra step is to calculate groups of mutually exclusive state atoms, so that the resulting rule sheet could be processed more efficiently.\ The benefit of this approach is it's compatibility -- instantiated input might be written back in KIF, resulting in a rule sheet that every GGP agent can process without any further modifications. However, instantiation might not always be feasible to carry out. For some games from Dresden GGP Server[^5], the C++ instantiator ran out of time or memory. Despite that, instantiation has been utilized in the Gamer GGP Agent . ## Perspective of Further Development Presented methods approach the problem of (multi) game playing from entirely different angles. Despite using MCTS methods, both in GGP and in recent computer Go, there is a tremendous gap in performance of those systems. Naturally, Go has the advantage of the knowledge being carefully tested by researchers. But the used methods are also far apart. Another thing that strikes at a closer look is the appalling performance of existing GGP reasoning systems.\ Research in the area of GGP continues in different directions. But some of them seem to arise when trying to cope with minor flaws of the system. Perhaps GGP is mature enough to be reevaluated, to direct future research towards more exciting methods focusing solely on playing, possibly drawing from other, successful MCTS-based projects. # Problem Definition {#chap:problem} ## Motivation It is clear that MCTS technique has become a standard in meta-gaming and is a valuable approach for games with high branching factor. However, some argue that the AAAI GGP Competition does not encourage CI methods and actually learning the game. It might be valuable to relax a bit restrictions imposed by the GGP specification; overcome some of it's flaws in order to develop stronger agents. However, the main assumption of GGP should be retained: learning without any human supervision.\ MCTS has been widely applied to problems and games perceived as hard, with Go being the prime example of such. Large branching factor rules out conventional, tree-searching methods for such games. A great deal of research has been made in terms of adapting and equipping MCTS with hand-coded knowledge, or mined from expert game records in Go. Usually, in chess, the Game of Amazons, etc., the knowledge and learning are carried beforehand, and the agent is being optimized for fast state-switching. GGP has a different philosophy: learning and playing the game are almost parallel, so it's hard to expect robust state-switching. Those two activities might be better off separate.\ The Go approach of game record analysis and mining spatial features, presented particularly in , seems applicable to GGP with slight modifications. Such features usually rely on Euclidean metric. Numerous attempts to automatic discovery of metrics in GGP have been presented in Subsection [2.5.4](#subsec:boardDiscovery){reference-type="ref" reference="subsec:boardDiscovery"}. It would be more reliable to simply add board meta data to the game's rule sheet and continue with mining the features. Performance might not be that good with a generic-feature approach as it is in Go, but it might still suffice to strengthen the agent against weak UCT players in a multi-game environment.\ Additionally, even with quality game knowledge at hand, the appalling performance of Prolog-based reasoning engines might compromise the agent's ability to play. As stated in Subsection [2.7.1](#subsec:prolog){reference-type="ref" reference="subsec:prolog"}, such engines, while the easiest to employ, are the main reason of inefficiency of GGP agents. The approach from  of translating GDL to C++, which makes as a reasonable trade-off between performance and resource utilization, is well worth reevaluating. Especially, when code generation might be greatly simplified with a slight and not that harmful change to GDL.\ All the mentioned ideas pose as an opportunity for creating a system, where developing the game knowledge would be a separate process carried automatically prior to the match, unlike in GGP where it always happens while the match goes on. During an actual play, a lean, robust agent could then use the knowledge to it's advantage, focusing only on the tree search. ## The Problem This publication pursues the goal of making a design, implementation and evaluation of a lean, versatile GGP player. Such player should be able to learn the game before an actual GGP match, but still without any human supervision. Thus, some limitations imposed by GGP may be relaxed in order to achieve the goal. ## Discussion A lean player is, in principle, an agent conserving the resources-that is available memory and computational power. CPU conservation was achieved by efficient reasoning engine, generated ad-hoc from the rule sheet. Two different concepts of generating C++ source code were examined. Both designs, reliant on ordinary arrays and custom data structures instead of STL containers, involved reserving the whole memory at startup, to mitigate the management overhead mentioned in the original paper. The newly designed system was also modular, in the sense that it easily allowed swapping the underlying containers or key code-generating functions; the two new mentioned versions shared most of the source code. To keep things simple, a small change to the GDL specification was made, which resulted in a new language: sharing the same syntax but slightly different semantics. While GDL allows and encourages using complex terms as arguments for predicates, a quick analysis of a set of popular GDL games revealed that they are not being used in practice even in complicated rule sheets. Thus, the simplified version of GDL constitutes a solid theoretical base for the system, as well as it results in a clear and comprehensible source code. The idea from Holt  of using transposition tables was extended, to adapt to possible, demanding memory constrains. Instead of randomly deleting states, the refined design presented in this work combined transposition tables with priority lists, allowing to keep the most interesting states intact. Thus, MCTS limited with small transposition table, would build the game tree selectively, adapting to the most pormising branches.\ As to learning the game beforehand, an attempt to apply some successful ideas from the Go community was made (described in Section [2.6](#sec:goKnowledge){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:goKnowledge"}), to general games. It required to analyze game records, find simple features describing the board and assign them weights, to gather basic knowledge about the game. The features were inspired by those which are and are not Go-specific, and rely only on the Euclidean metric (and structure of the board). To achieve this, GDL has been modified with a small, backward-compatible extension. It supplied the basic meta informations about the game board and additional semantics of the rule sheet to the agent, remaining transparent to the agents not supporting it.\ The features were mined by analysis of a game records database. To generate quality ones, a multi-agent system was designed, driven by an evolutionary approach. The agents improved upon both their knowledge and their plays.\ To strengthen the knowledge module, some of the inconclusive features were backed with frequent itemsets of state facts and meta-facts. Because the games (and thus their states), which can be thought of as Apriori baskets, can be both winning or loosing, an approach similar to that in  was needed in order to gather game facts associated with winning (but not loosing) and vice versa. A variation of the Apriori Algorithm  was prepared, which adapted to those needs and fit well with the expected game data.\ # Proposed Approach {#chap:keyIdeas} The new approach which this thesis proposes, merely outlined in the previous chapter, is presented in detail in this chapter. It has been created as a solution for the stated problem, and might be considered the core of this publication. First, a revised scheme of translating GDL rule sheets to C++ code is presented and formally backed with an alternation to GDL. Next, a small extension to GDL is described along with a kind of game knowledge, which the extension allows to obtain. Lastly, a way of extracting spatial knowledge through self-play, including necessary algorithms, is presented. ## Revised GDL to C++ Translation Scheme Game instantiation or inference through Propositional Automata results in far more efficient reasoning than with Prolog. However, those methods are bulky both time-and memory-wise, and do not work for certain complex games, due to exceeding time and memory limits. The code generation approach was chosen for this publication as a compact alternative, not subjected to memory-overflowing issues. The realizations of this approach mentioned in Subsection [2.7.2](#subsec:compilation){reference-type="ref" reference="subsec:compilation"} performed well, while leaving room for some obvious improvements.\ In this chapter, design of a refined GDL/KIF to C++ translation scheme based on , created for this publication, is described. First, the concept of a reasoning tree is clarified. By considering sample queries, the mGDL language is outlined and defined as a subset of GDL, much easier to process. Then, examples are presented of how the translation of mGDL/KIF rules to C++ routines can proceed. Furthermore, two versions of the refined code generation approach, based on different reasoning algorithms, are explained. The system has been designed in such way, that the underlying data containers and output functions could be changed with little effort, thus both versions share most of the source code.\ ### Reasoning Trees A typical way to resolve a Datalog/Prolog query is to evaluate the associated reasoning tree made of the rules and facts. It can be done with a bottom-up or a top-down approach. The tree can be build recurrently: 1. Begin with a query sentence \(\phi_q\) as a root. 2. If \(\phi\) is a sentence: - Find a set \(C\) of rules and facts \(\phi\) unifies with. - If \(|C| > 1\) then add an `OR` vertex as a child of \(v\), with elements from \(C\) as it's children and apply recurrently to those children. - If \(|C| = 1\) then make the element from \(C\) a child of \(v\) and apply recurrently to that child. 3. If \(\phi\) is a rule then add each \(\phi\)'s literal as it's child and apply recurrently. The resulting tree has the rules as internal nodes, and facts as leaves. Sample trees generated with *tictactoe.kif* rule file are presented in Figure [\[fig:tictactoeTrees\]](#fig:tictactoeTrees){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:tictactoeTrees"}. To illustrate size of typical reasoning trees, a few more examples are presented in Figures [\[fig:chessAsteroidsTrees\]](#fig:chessAsteroidsTrees){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:chessAsteroidsTrees"}, [\[fig:othelloTrees\]](#fig:othelloTrees){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:othelloTrees"}, with labels removed for enhanced readability.\ ### Leveraging Datalog GDL was designed to describe games, which have natural representations as DFAs. But Datalog or even Datalog stripped of variables is expressive enough to describe them. In fact, a similar concept was explored in the rule sheet instantiation scheme mentioned in Subsection [2.7.4](#subsec:instantiation){reference-type="ref" reference="subsec:instantiation"}.\ As the GDL specification  states, it builds directly on top of Datalog, adding a few changes. The most meaningful is addition of function constants, what results in a possibility of occurrence of nested atomic sentences. It also complicates the reasoning; for instance, a sample query (legal xplayer ?move) can yield ?move: (play 1 3 x) ?move: noop ?move: (foo (bar (baz x))), and implies usage of an unification algorithm for inference.\ In practice, it is rarely handy to use nested atomic sentences. Whether is it worth having that extra syntactic sugar at the expense of complicated reasoning, is a mater of discussion. On the one hand, unification should not consume much time since the expressions to unify are supposed to be simple in most cases (and they almost never have nested function constants). On the other hand, it always adds the overhead. It depends heavily on the implementation of the reasoning engine.\ Of course, the matter of usefulness of nested function constants depends on what queries are to be made to the reasoning engine. If, for instance, the previous query would be reformulated to (legal xplayer (play ?x ?y ?p)), then the answer set would be ?x: 1 ?y: 3 ?p: x. An ordinary agent would have almost fixed set of possible queries throughout the game, specifically: - `next` queries, - `legal` queries, - `goal` queries, - `terminal` queries. As in Figure [\[fig:tictactoeTrees\]](#fig:tictactoeTrees){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:tictactoeTrees"}, those would be the roots of the queries. Because of their arguments' semantics, `next` and `legal` rules usually introduce nested atomic sentences (like in `(<= (legal xplayer (mark ?x ?y x)...)` for instance).\ It follows that it is a matter of making measured queries, to keep the reasoning fairly simple and have variables bind only to object constants. This realization led to the definition of a variant of GDL under the working name mGDL. It guarantees that variables can bind only to object constants, with function constants left merely as a syntactic sugar. ### mGDL As an attempt to simplify GDL, therefore simplifying the reasoning, mGDL has been created as a part of research for this publication. Since the definition of mGDL is almost identical to the original definition of GDL , only altered parts are given. Following the convention adopted from the mentioned document, changes are emphasized with a bold font. mGDL is somewhat between Datalog and GDL. Function constants have been left for notation consistency's sake, but variables are not allowed to range over sentences. It is also worth emphasizing that, while the semantics change, the syntax does not. Consider the rules (<= (foo a)) (<= (foo (bar a))) A query `(foo ?x)` would yield the following results: ;; GDL ?x: a ?x: (bar a) ;; mGDL ?x: a ;; ?x cannot be unified with (bar a) Under the assumption of making measured queries, most of the popular rule sheets have the same semantics in both mGDL and GDL. It was confirmed in Section [6.2.1](#subsec:mgdlTest){reference-type="ref" reference="subsec:mgdlTest"}.\ The simplest form of unification-based  reasoning is presented in Algorithm [\[alg:queryResolving\]](#alg:queryResolving){reference-type="ref" reference="alg:queryResolving"}. As mentioned earlier, the minimal reasoning engine \"interface\" exposed to the agent consists of functions corresponding to reserved predicates. With reasoning trees rooted in those queries, the unification would occur multiple times in every single node of those trees, including the leaves.\ With mGDL, the unification is greatly simplified, for it concerns only \"flat\" atomic sentences. It requires only to check if the corresponding functors and arguments match-and that is linear in time with respect to the number of arguments. Of course, good unification algorithm would also perform in linear time with such data. However, by translating atomic sentences directly to C++ routines, the overhead is greatly reduced, and no complex tree-structured expressions (representing potential substitutions for variables) are being passed as arguments. Instead, language constructs are being leveraged, and function arguments are mapped to simple types only. ### The Database Aspect {#subsec:database} Falling back to Datalog-like reasoning with mGDL brings out the database aspect of reasoning. After all, Datalog is the language for deductive databases. Intensive research in that area was conducted starting from the late 80s, and Datalog is still in use to this day . Many clever algorithms like the Magic Sets  were developed, and there is certainly a room for improvement in developing compact, mGDL reasoning engines too.\ Throughout the game, the rules do not change. In a sense, they constitute relational algebra relations. Resolving a query can be seen as a chain of relational algebra operations, namely: projection, selection, natural join and cross join (Cartesian product). For instance, rule (<= (sibling ?x ?y) (child ?x ?x1) (child ?y ?y1) (married ?x1 ?y1)) can be rewritten in relational algebra as \[Q = \pi_{X,Y} \left(\left(Child_{X,X1} \times Child_{Y,Y1} \right) \bowtie Married_{X1,Y1} \right).\] When choosing an external reasoning engine, instead of reaching for Prolog because of similarities of syntax/semantics, it could be more efficient to pick an engine that closer matches the needs in terms of what it does. An example of such engine would be a one based on Datalog or Relational Algebra. mGDL could mitigate the difficulties in suiting systems of this kind to GGP. This publication, however, does not further pursue the idea. ### Table-Driven and Query-Driven Models {#subsec:gtcModels} As mentioned earlier, one of the goals of this publication was to pursue an efficient GDL to C++ translation scheme. The developed approach required translating each rule and fact to a C++ function. As the evaluation of an expression (query) proceeded in a top-down manner, the function matching the query was called. In the function's body, the literals were evaluated by calling the corresponding functions, and so on.\ Two models of carrying tree evaluation were chosen for implementation and testing, both sharing essentially the same components: a table-driven and a query-driven one. They varied in how variables were handled and passed down the tree.\ By enumerating all object constants in a particular rule file, they can be mapped to natural numbers. In mGDL, storage of potential variable values is straightforward, as they do not have to be polymorphic. At minimum, a set of values a variable might be bound to, can be represented by a linear container of primitive integer type. ##### The table-driven model In this model, a two-dimensional array of primitive type is stored in the memory. It might be though of as a simple table of valid variable substitutions. More specifically, each column corresponds to a GDL variable, and each record to a valid set of values.\ With such table, tree evaluation still proceeds top-down. The nodes are visited along a depth-first search path: - Each time a node \(v\) is visited, new variables might be declared. - Variables declared in \(v\) are local only for the subtree rooted in \(v\). The second property allows to always add/remove columns in the \"last in, first out\" fashion. Simply speaking, the table will never have empty columns in between. An example is shown in Figure [\[fig:lilo\]](#fig:lilo){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:lilo"}. However, the columns were not simply added; the join operation took place, as soon as new variables were bound to possible sets of values. In the example in Figure [\[fig:lilo\]](#fig:lilo){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:lilo"}, let \(VS\) denote the `VarStore` relation (table), and \(Bar\), \(Baz\) relations obtained from `(bar ?y)` and `(baz ?x ?z)` respectively. After `bar` has been evaluated, the new relation \(VS'\) would be \[VS'=VS\times Bar\] and, after resolving `baz`, \(VS''\) would be equal to \[VS''=VS'\bowtie Baz\] (with both relations joined on \(X\)).\ One advantage of this approach was the simplicity of the source code. Recalling from the GDL specification  that a GDL rule is an implication \[h \gets b_1 \wedge \ldots \wedge b_n,\] where the head \(h\) is an atomic sentence and each \(b_i\) in the body is a literal, it was translated roughly to bool h() { return b1() &&... && bn(); } with the `VarStore` object passed by reference between the functions.\ Another advantage was the memory management. A large table variable was declared at run-time and kept throughout the whole game, solving the memory management problem mentioned in . The maximum number of variables (columns) that have to be stored simultaneously, bounding the table size in one dimension, can be determined by a simple DFS browsing of the reasoning tree. ##### The query-driven model To rule out join operations completely, the table-driven approach was combined with the idea from . Previously, processing a rule required evaluating each of the literals only once. The latter has literals evaluated multiple times in nested loops.\ The change shifts the cost, from manipulating a variable table, to evaluating the same literals multiple times (which also results in multiple function calls), but with less data.\ The query-driven model still used the variable table object-but only locally to a literal. A GDL rule was translated roughly to bool h() { vs_1 = b1(); for (int i1 = 0; i1 < vs_1.len; ++i1) { r2 = b2(); ... vs_n = bn(); for (int in = 0; in < vs_n.len; ++in) { results.add_result(); } ... } } where \(\text{\texttt{r1}}, \ldots, \text{\texttt{rn}}\) denote `VarStore` objects. ### Generating the Source Code There are three main kinds of entities that might occur in a rule file Their summary is shown in Figure [4.1](#tab:kifObjects){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:kifObjects"}. Each kind has been converted to a piece of C++ source code in a slightly different manner. [\[tab:kifObjects\]]{#tab:kifObjects label="tab:kifObjects"} ##### Rules Each rule had a function associated (precisely, a set of overloads); functions' bodies were dependent on the chosen reasoning model. ##### Static and dynamic facts Following the notion adapted from Prolog-based agents, relation constants were assumed unique to either static facts, dynamic facts, or rules. With this assumption, static facts are easy to recognize; those are the ground atomic sentences hanging loosely in the KIF files, and they stay unchanged throughout the whole game.\ Dynamic facts are a little harder to distinguish; during the first turn, those are the ones decorated with the `init` functor. After the turn has passed, they should be replaced with new ones inferred with the `next` rules.\ Both kinds of facts had C++ containers and a set of querying functions associated. ##### Name mangling Because in mGDL, function constants have been syntactically left intact, it became less obvious how to translate nested atomic sentences to C++ functions. A simple name mangling scheme was used, so the name of a function could reflect the structure of the corresponding atomic sentence. The conversion was simple; it essentially required to flatten[^6] the sentences. For instance, rule head (<= (legal ?player (move ?x ?y ?piece)) would be flattened to (<= (legal_ARG_LPAR_move_ARG_ARG_ARG_RPAR ?player ?x ?y ?piece)). The name reflects all terms and parentheses, read from left to right. The naming scheme is verbose in part for the human reader's sake. The finished, compiled reasoner did not break up the function name to analyze it during the runtime. ##### The procedure The complete procedure of generating the source code was as follows: 1. The rule sheet, assumed to be written in mGDL, was preprocessed. Preprocessing consisted of identifying static/dynamic functors, removing `true` functors, and flattening the sentences with the name mangling scheme. `or/n` literals were isolated to \(n\) separate sub-rules. 2. For each fact and each rule, functions (along with the relevant overloads) were generated. 3. The common interface was completed with interface functions for making precise queries to `legal`, `next`, `goal` and `terminal`. 4. The code was compiled as a shared object. The common, pre-written code included the reasoning engine interface, auxiliary wrappers for saving/loading states, resetting the games etc., variable table, and fact containers. ### Optimizations The original paper describing translating GDL rule sheets to C++ code also featured description of optimizations. The following paragraphs provide a short commentary for those, with respect to the proposed new translation scheme. ##### Memorization Waugh  employed memorization of state-independent query results (those, which do not rely on the `does` relations). In the query-driven model, with immediate substitution of variables with values, leaves with no variables are getting evaluated far more often than in the table-driven approach. Evaluating leaves with no variables, which defaults to a boolean query, can be realized simply by a hashset lookup-and it further adds to the performance. While memorization of fact queries might not be worth the cost, an efficient technique of memorizing rule queries (again, only state-independent) might yield further improvements.\ In implementation made for this publication, only memorization of fact-queries was investigated. Facts were called in the leaves of the reasoning tree; queries might have been either entirely boolean (with no variables), or they might have required a join operation.\ Because of the query-driven model characteristics, fact queries were called more often and with less variables, than in the table-driven approach. Particularly, profiling the output with Google CPU Profiler[^7] revealed that for most of the games, fact queries with no variables took most of the time spent on fact queries. The amount varied from game to game, being usually around 5%-30% of total runtime.\ To mitigate the issue, a hashset lookup was implemented with open addressing hashsets[^8]. Double hashing was used. Again, for each fact, memory for lookup set was reserved at startup. This form of caching was used for all fact containers, and yielded improvements for all of the tested games. ##### Relevant function overloads To reduce the size of output source files and compilation times, only the necessary function overloads (for rules and facts) were generated. Each function was overloaded with possible combinations of input arguments as constants/variables, but not all combinations were present in the reasoning tree.\ With a fixed set of possible queries, all possible function overloads have been identified. To achieve that, a DFS search in the reasoning tree was employed, substituting variables with labels `<var>` and `<const>`. In other words, trees have been flooded to see what kinds of arguments were to be expected in the rules' heads. By tracing the labels, overloads were obtained. It should be however noted, that such set is a superset of the sufficient set of overloads, as some literals and rule heads agreeing in functors and arities might still never unify during the game. For instance `(goal <var> <const>)` corresponding to `(goal <var> 100)` would still unify with `(goal ?x 50)`. However the supersets, even for demanding game rules like chess and checkers, turned out to be of acceptable size.\ Function overloads, prepared this way, fit well with the C++ overload constructs. Below are sample definitions of functions from the aforementioned Tic-tac-toe, obtained by the method: ##### Reordering of literals also employed reordering of literals by the number of unknown variables, but with respect to Datalog Rule's Safety property . Saffidine and Cazenave  however, has not reordered the literals, under an assumption that the creator of the rule file might have already ordered them, keeping efficiency in mind. Under the same assumption, in implementation made for this publication, literals also have not been reordered.\ ## Spatial Game Knowledge {#sec:knowledgeMining} The following section describes an attempt made in this thesis, to transfer the ideas of obtaining feature-based game knowledge in Go, mentioned in Chapter [2](#chap:sota){reference-type="ref" reference="chap:sota"}, to GGP. Numerous successful MCTS-based Go agents achieved professional rankings by taking advantage of such methods, which could be of great value to GGP as well.\ There are, however, legitimate reasons why the feature approach is not straightforward to be applied to GGP. To name a few: - Knowledge modules usually use game-specific features. - An arbitrary game (in it's abstract form) not necessarily takes place on a 2-dimensional board, what further discards some universal features. Even if the game has some kind of a board, the agent is not aware of it's structure. - Board pieces cannot be assumed to be persistent between states; predictive power of patterns may be limited. For instance, a few games might be \"mixed\" into one and being played in parallel, alternating between entirely different board situations. - There are no quality game records for general games, useful for mining features and weights. - Resources devoted to developing the agent are limited in GGP (usually it is the startclock phase of a playout). - No human intervention is assumed in GGP. The agent would have to tune all the parameters by itself, which is again hard to achieve reliably within the resource constrains. This publication relaxes the limitations imposed by the GGP specification, so the developed GGP agent could be equipped with more advanced features in the likeness of Go-playing agents, and the other MCTS-based ones. However, the assumption of no human intervention during the whole process is retained, as the most crucial one.\ The following sections address the aforementioned issues in detail. ### The Euclidean Board Metric Extension of GDL {#subsec:gdlExtension} This section covers a proposed extension to GDL, introduced in order to reliably extract Go-like game features. Subsection [2.5.4](#subsec:boardDiscovery){reference-type="ref" reference="subsec:boardDiscovery"} describes some of the tools allowing to infer the existence of the board and define the Euclidean metric for a particular GDL rule sheet. However, none of these tools are reliable; good tools would have to thoroughly understand a particular game and it's spatial arrangement, a task that might not be at all possible for some games. Although the class of games describable by GDL is enormously large, most of the real-world games translated to GDL are actually square-board games or at least they have a quantified, spatial representation. In other words, many of them are not purely abstract (like rock-paper-scissors in contrast to Tic-tac-toe) or do not happen in continuous domains (like the original Ms. Pac-Man).\ For this reason, this publication introduces an extension to the GDL specification, consisting of new reserved relations, describing multi-dimensional boards and the corresponding pieces. With the extension, underlying structures of most of the board games can be recognized unequivocally. The extension is not mandatory, and it requires only to supply the meta data in form of static facts in the KIF file.\ The system works with boards of hypercubical shape. Formally a board is a set: \[\left\{ \begin{pmatrix} r_1, \cdots, r_n \end{pmatrix}^T: d_{min} \leq r_1, \dots, r_n \leq d_{max} \right\},\] which is described in GDL by the following relations: `boardboundaries/2` : -a range \([d_{min};d_{max}]\) for a single board dimension, `boardrelation/1` : -a relation denoting a single board field, like `cell` or `mark`, `boardpattern/k` : -a pattern describing the meaning of the board relation's arguments, `playfunctor/1` : -a relation denoting placing a piece on a board, `playpattern/l` : -a pattern describing the meaning of the play relation's arguments. Additional reserved constants used in the relations are: `piece` : -a piece argument, `dim` : -a board dimension, `skip` : -a meaningless argument. The added extensions require an additional: The extension behaves a lot like the `role` predicate-it resides in the KIF file and serves as a reference for the agent. If the agent does not support it, it will be transparent, as the sentences simply will not take place in the reasoning. When adding the extension, one would also have to ensure no name collisions would occur. Figure [\[fig:gdlExtensions\]](#fig:gdlExtensions){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:gdlExtensions"} presents an example of the extension from a rule file. ### Spatial Features {#subsec:features} A typical feature is a function: \[\delta :(s_n, M_{n-1}, m_n) \rightarrow \{0,1\},\] where \(s_i\) is the \(i-\)th game state, \(m_i\) is a move to be made in this state by the investigated player, and \(M_i\) is a set of moves for all the players. Simply put, the function checks if the intended move meets particular conditions (creates a pattern, takes part in a formation, makes a capture, etc.) and acts as an indirect prediction for the next state.\ The following system of simple features has been designed with arbitrary games in mind. The prerequisites were: - a hypercubical board, - players making move by indicating coordinates on the board (by placing, moving, removing pieces, etc.), - relations describing boards and moves, following the conventions close enough to be described by the extension. Each feature had a weight associated, and the features later took part in the agents' plays. The features included: Proximity between the moves : A distance between the last and the current move. If many players have made the move during last turn, it's a distance to the closest one. This is the proximity feature that is well known to pay out in Go. Nearest border distance : A distance to the closest board border, expressed with a single, real number. Absolute piecewise move : A move made by a player, regardless of a state or any other contributing factor, weighted and marked as a good or a bad one. The feature has been inspired by Cadiaplayer's MAST technique described in Subsection [2.6.2](#subsec:incorporation){reference-type="ref" reference="subsec:incorporation"}. Absolute piecewise move in area : Presence of a piece in a specific board area. If square board's fields \((1,1)\) and \((1,2)\) belong to the same area, facts `(mark 1 1 x)` and `(mark 1 2 x)` would yield the same feature. K-nearest neighbors : A list of \(k\) closest neighboring pieces (in respect to the field where a move is to be made), ordered lexicographically. K-nearest neighbors in one dimension : Similarly, a list of \(k\) nearest pieces only in 1 dimension, but ordered by the distance. They would correspond to columns and rows on a \(2\)-dimensional plane. Itemsets only : A dummy feature, meant to be backed up with itemsets, that are enough interesting alone. More information on itemsets is provided in Subsection [4.3.3](#subsec:itemsets){reference-type="ref" reference="subsec:itemsets"}. ### Board Areas Some of the features rely on the concept of board areas. A board was divided into square (or hypercubical in general) areas, so the common features for neighboring fields could be captured. Let \(d = |d_{max}-d_{min}|\) be the board size. Variable area size was chosen as \[s = \left\lfloor \frac{(d+1)}{log_2 \left(d + 1\right) + 1} \right\rfloor.\] Areas were indexed with natural numbers. An area \(A_{t_1,\ldots,t_n},\; t_i\in\mathbb{N}\) was defined as \[\left\{ \left(r_1,\ldots ,r_n\right)^T: d_{min} + st_i \leq r_i < d_{min} +s(t_i+1),\quad i\in\left\{1,\ldots,n\right\} \right\}.\] The definition was tailored specifically to \(8 \times 8\) boards, so it would result in \(2 \times 2\) ares. A sample area is shown in Figure [\[fig:area\]](#fig:area){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:area"}. The upper borders of the area are not inclusive (marked with dashed lines)-this way an area of size \(n\) spans over \(n\) integer points in each of the dimensions. ### Meta Facts Apart from spatial features, which act like simple predictions for consecutive game states, a similar mechanism was used to express the statements about the current state only.\ Meta facts are realized by binary functions; a particular meta fact is either present in a state or not. They are aggregated into groups; each group \(\psi\) is associated with a function \[\psi: S \rightarrow \{0,1\}^n,\] returning a binary vector depicting, if the corresponding features are present or not. A meta fact describing that something occurs in area \(A_{i,j}\), would return a list of all the areas indicating, which are the interesting ones. Meta facts (groups) share the following properties: - \(n \leq |S|\) (size of the vector is not greater than the number of facts), - some of meta facts are more frequent than average facts. Of course, far more sophisticated methods could have been employed to overcome the problem of finding associations between the pieces. However, such simple way of abstracting information about the game mimics the human ability of doing so.\ So far, only two meta facts were used: Any piece in a field : A particular field having any piece on it. It might be useful for games with many pieces, but also for situations, when a distinction between pieces of the player and his opponent is not necessary. Piece in area : Like the feature with a similar name, true when a certain piece lays within the area. ## Obtaining the Knowledge {#sec:analyzer} One of the goals of this thesis was to design a system, not only able to play an arbitrary (board) game, but also able to gradually learn it. Hence the assumption, that the rules are known for an undefined amount of time before the actual playout. For the computations were very time consuming, hours where expected, rather than minutes or seconds, as it is usually the case with GGP.\ A tool external to the agent, Knowledge Miner (also referenced as the analyzer), has been designed to perform the learning process, thus completing the spatial board knowledge approach made to address the learning issue in this publication. The following sections describe a variant of Simple Genetic Algorithm along with the feature finding scheme, used by the analyzer for developing a strong knowledge file. ### Self-Play Through Modified SGA With no game records available for an arbitrary game, a scheme with a population of competing agents has been created with the following goals in mind: - producing game records of greater quality, than with bare UCT agents, - gathering meaningful features by analysis of those records, - making crucial choices concerning utilization of features, - fine-tuning knowledge parameters. Simple Genetic Algorithm  has been used as a basis for the evolutionary algorithm. Skill of individuals was meant to gradually improve with every generation, as well as the quality of their game knowledge. The individuals have been scored according to their performance during inter-generation matches. Apart from regular evolutionary operators, separate feature mining took place (using game records gathered during the previous generation). Then, after applying evolutionary operators, the agents were allowed to update their knowledge with newly mined features, according to their individual feature-learning policies. The goal was to improve upon both the knowledge and game records, to finally develop the ultimate game knowledge. The algorithm is shown in Algorithm [\[alg:evoAnalyzer\]](#alg:evoAnalyzer){reference-type="ref" reference="alg:evoAnalyzer"}.\ Mining features for each individual alone has been rejected as too time-and resource-consuming. Because of this shortcoming, at the knowledge mining phase, the knowledge has been mined from the entire population's game records combined. Of course having many agents sharing the same knowledge would be pointless; to bring back the diversity, each agent had a simple learning policy and a set of varying knowledge parameters. The parameters were also subjected to evolution. ##### Chromosome The basic chromosome has been made a string of \(\mathbb{R}\), \(\mathbb{N}\), and 0-1 values. The values represented different knowledge parameters (more on parameters in Section [5.1.5](#subsec:gameKnowFormat){reference-type="ref" reference="subsec:gameKnowFormat"}). Because of this heterogeneity of genes, uniform crossover has been employed. Each chromosome has been also paired with a feature list. The list were subjected only to the crossover operator: the resulting list was a list of \(n_{max}\) best features (in respect to their weights) from a set of unique features, from both of the parents' lists combined. The number \(n_{max}\) has been stored in the chromosome. Updates of feature lists (with the population's newly mined knowledge) have been carried in a similar fashion. ### Feature Mining Following the ideas from Go (Section [2.6](#sec:goKnowledge){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:goKnowledge"}) of analyzing professional game records, a similar scheme has been employed for mining features. Moves can be associated with states, in which they were made, of both winning and loosing parties. The games were not assumed symmetric (or almost-symmetric); while playing with white and black pieces in chess is almost the same in theory, features for both colors were chosen separately.\ To begin mining on a set of records, all the records were loaded; for each player and each state, the occurring features were recognized and divided into sets \(F_w\) and \(F_l\), winning and loosing feature sets respectively.\ To recognize correlations of certain features with success or failure, the phi correlation coefficient was used. For each feature \(\delta\), the following values were computed:\ The problem is rather hard to tackle; the Apriori itself might, under the right circumstances, return an exponentially large output, and a subpart of the algorithm is NP-complete . The hard part is, however, finding itemsets frequent and infrequent (in different sets) at the same time. #### The downward closure lemma The following auxiliary relations simplify the stated problem. Let \(D=\{t_1,t_2,\ldots,t_n\}\) be the set of baskets, \(I\) an itemset, \(r_f,r_i\in \mathbb{R}\): \[\begin{aligned} \textit{freq}(I) \Leftrightarrow \textit{supp}(I) \geq r_f,\\ \textit{infreq}(I) \Leftrightarrow 1-\textit{supp}(I) \geq r_i. \end{aligned}\] The problem comes down to finding itemsets both frequent in \(D\) and infrequent in \(U\). Finding frequent itemsets belongs to the Apriori Algorithm. The algorithm is based on the downward closure lemma, which guaranties that larger (candidate) itemsets may be obtained by extending smaller ones. However, extending itemsets does not work with infrequent itemsets, where larger itemsets could be narrowed down to obtain smaller candidate itemsets. The following lemmas express these properties through *freq*/*infreq* relations: With those properties proved, the downward closure lemma can be introduced. Because [\[eq:lemma2.1\]](#eq:lemma2.1){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:lemma2.1"} and [\[eq:lemma2.2\]](#eq:lemma2.2){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:lemma2.2"} do not hold, infrequent itemsets cannot be build from smaller ones. An example would be a set of \(20\) cars: \(10\) red, and \(10\) fast. While being red and being fast are certainly frequent characteristics, being both red and fast is not, as there is no such car in the set.\ Wu et al.  solved a similar problem by narrowing down mined infrequent itemsets to only those, for which their every subset is also infrequent. In other words, the paper explored the possibility of applying the downward closure lemma to infrequent itemsets regardless of the aforementioned issue, arguing that such infrequent itemsets were less likely accidental. Itemsets found through this approach satisfy the relation: \[\textit{infreq}(I_k) \Leftrightarrow \textit{infreq}(I_{k-1}).\] In this publication, taking into account that desired fact sets were rather small (so they could be quickly computed), and assuming small baskets (number of elements close to the number of board fields/pieces), the problem has been approached with a naive solution for smaller itemsets, and the downward closure lemma for larger ones. It is presented in Algorithm [\[alg:myApriori\]](#alg:myApriori){reference-type="ref" reference="alg:myApriori"}.\ The algorithm explores the aforementioned idea of applying the downward closure lemma to infrequent itemsets, even though it would only return some of the itemsets. It begins with a brute force search for small itemsets (size \(k\leq3\) was intended). Starting from \(k+1\), it then applies the downward closure lemma. The mining takes place in baskets \(D\) and \(U\) in parallel. # Testing Platform {#chap:testingPlatform} This chapter introduces GGP Spatium-a GGP framework created particularly for this publication. It also covers the environment, in which the framework has been employed for evaluation of the approach presented in the previous chapter. ## GGP Spatium Framework An extensive framework, named GGP Spatium, has been implemented to evaluate the ideas presented in Chapter [4](#chap:keyIdeas){reference-type="ref" reference="chap:keyIdeas"}. Targeting Unix platforms, it consists of nearly \(35000\) lines of code, written mostly in C++ and Python, and has been released under GNU LGPL license  as an addition to this publication. It should be noted that there exist similar projects, like Java-based GGP Galaxy  or RL-GGP , which is also Java-based and constitutes a testbed for reinforced learning algorithms for GGP. However, due to different principles of those projects and technologies involved, it was more convenient to create an independent framework.\ The main components of the system are: GGP Agent : -(C++), an UCT-based agent capable of carrying regular GGP matches using the protocol, GDL To C++ Generator : -(C++, Python), a tool generating reasoning machine C++ source code out of mGDL rule sheets, Knowledge Miner : -(Python), a tool, based on an evolutionary algorithm, which conducts plays and analyzes game records of population of agents in order to produce a knowledge file, Game Runner : -(C++), a small tool reusing most of the agent's code in order to accurately measure raw performance of supplied reasoning engines, Game Library : -a simple database of rule sheets, GTC engine source code files, compiled.so libraries and game knowledge, maintained automatically by the agents. The framework also includes miscellaneous scripts, i.e. mGDL conformance checker or a knowledge file scorer. Layer architecture diagrams, illustrating the key components, are shown in Figure [\[fig:arch\]](#fig:arch){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:arch"}. UML diagrams of those components are presented in Appendix [\[apdx:uml\]](#apdx:uml){reference-type="ref" reference="apdx:uml"}. The following sections describe them in detail.\ ### GGP Agent The agent follows the popular design described in Section [5.3](#sec:agentArchitecture){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:agentArchitecture"}. It employs UCT, has a regular network interface to handle GGP game protocol, and an interface for playing algorithms (UCT, UCT with knowledge, purely random etc.).\ What may distinct the agent from other similar ones, is the implementation of concepts presented in Chapter [4](#chap:keyIdeas){reference-type="ref" reference="chap:keyIdeas"}, with a few additions for testing purposes: - two reasoning engines supplied by default: YAP and GTC, - a common interface for different reasoning engines, - a common interface for playing algorithms, - transposition table, simple and linked, - an Euclidean, feature-based knowledge module, able to load XML knowledge files (described later in this chapter), - ability to save XML game records (Figure [\[fig:xmlrecord\]](#fig:xmlrecord){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:xmlrecord"}) along with some internal data about the plays, - options for artificially limiting transposition table size, altering game clocks, enabling CPU profiling. The system of swapping reasoning engines deserves a broader attention. At default, at the beginning of each game, the agent tries to generate, compile and load a GTC reasoning engine. On failure, it falls back to YAP Prolog. Generated GTC files are stored in the library of known games, so a rule sheet would not have to be processed more than once. It is also possible to supply a custom-written C++ engine, along with a rule sheet it corresponds to. Lastly, the agent can be compiled statically with one, chosen game engine-be that GTC or a custom one.\ New playing algorithms can also be developed, by extending appropriate classes. Game clock multiplier is useful either for testing agents with uneven computation times, or conducting plays with clocks under 1 s with high-performance reasoning engines. Along with possibility of limiting transposition table memory in a sensible way, the framework provides means for creating agents not only as resource-intensive GGP contestants, but also compact, general-purpose problem solvers with network interfaces.\ ### GDL to C++ Generator GTC Generator is responsible for development and compilation of GTC reasoning machines. The operation is meant to be carried in the startclock phase of a match. Generator takes a rule sheet on input; it computes it's hash sum and stores the generated code in the game library. Afterwards, it attempts compilation.\ Common parts of code involve data structures and realization of the agent's reasoning engine interface. For a particular GDL rule sheet, only C++ source code files containing specific routines are being generated to complete the GTC engine, along with a GNU Make makefile for the ease of later compilation. On successful compilation, a shared object dynamic linked.so library[^9] is being created and stored in the Gamelib.\ The generator is capable of generating reasoning machines based on both schemes presented in Subsection [4.1.5](#subsec:gtcModels){reference-type="ref" reference="subsec:gtcModels"}. Said section also provides sample code excerpts for both methods. ### Evolutionary Knowledge Miner Principal of operation of the knowledge miner has been presented in depth in Section [4.2](#sec:knowledgeMining){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:knowledgeMining"}. However, gathering a vast number of game records is not straightforward, and requires an additional comment.\ The goal of knowledge miner is to develop a single game knowledge XML file. The miner is designed to work in a Local Area Network, where it also acts as a server coordinating client workstations. All workstations, along with the server, are assumed to have access to shared Network Attached Storage. Sample network diagram illustrating devices participating in mining the knowledge is shown in Figure [\[fig:lan\]](#fig:lan){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:lan"}.\ Client workstations spawn GGP Game Managers along with GGP Agent instances, carry out GGP matches, and save XML game logs to the shared space. The miner stores intermediate agents' knowledge in XML files in the shared space, so the agents could access it. No extra locking mechanisms are needed, because the server and clients write the shared data in different phases of the mining algorithm. Client-server communication takes place over the network, using TCP/IP protocol.\ A special case of described network setup is running the server and clients on a single machine. In that case, the communication takes place through the loopback interface, and the shared space might be i.e. the computer's hard drive. ### Transposition Table The goal of the transposition table (TT for short) is to speed up the game graph search and keep the agent from consuming too much resources. The following design is an extended version of the one in . The paper gave an outline of a Java-based GGP agent; because for demanding games TT would take up most of available memory, the maximum size of TT was limited by the memory available to the whole Java Virtual Machine. Whenever the VM would go out of RAM, it would split the Transposition Table in half (thus deleting a \"random\" half of states).\ The transposition table used in this publication is similar, with an exception of using a linked hash set[^10] rather than an ordinary one. A linked hash set stored an additional list of nodes, which was used for better memory management. Because states also had pointers to other states, the transposition table became an interesting combination of three data structures: - a hash set, - a directed graph, - a linked list. Every reasoning engine implementing the agent's reasoning interface shipped it's own state class, equipped with a hashing function. The state's hash was it's key in the hash set.\ The linked list served as a priority queue. A new state inserted to the transposition table was also being inserted at the front of the queue. Each state was moved to the front of the queue upon visiting. If the maximum number of states had been reached, the last item queue item was being deleted, which turns out to be the one visited last. This strategy worked well with UCT; after all, UCT keeps the search \"fair\", so even average states get visited from time to time, and thus brought up to the front of the queue. With large enough memory limits, the game graph held only relevant parts of the game tree.\ Some game's GAs are graphs rather than trees (i.e. in chess the same state might be reached a few times since the players might be moving back and forth with the same pieces). Instead of flushing the transposition table or pruning the game graph with every turn, they were left intact. The old, possibly unreachable states, were deleted in the first place, since they were last in the queue anyway.\ Figure [\[fig:tt\]](#fig:tt){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:tt"} shows an example of transposition table's behavior when accessing/adding a state. Each state contains pointers to reachable, already visited states (indexed with moves). Upon visiting, state \(S_D\) is being moved to the front of the linked list. The move set \(M^D_1\) is to be made during the UCT search phase. There is no path from \(S_D\) labeled with \(M^D_1\), so a new state is created. If a state with such hash value has already been stored in the hash set, the missing path is added; otherwise the state \(S_F\) is inserted to TT. \(S_F\) is brought to the front of the linked list. The size limit has been reached, so the last state in the linked list, \(S_C\), is being deleted. The design involves usage of some kind of smart pointers, so no additional updates on the game graph would be necessary.\ Finally, the maximum size of the TT during runtime can set as simply the maximum number of states, or more precisely as a rough size in bytes by estimating an average size of a state during runtime. The design provides an interface for states having self-size estimating function. ### Game Knowledge Format {#subsec:gameKnowFormat} Recalling Section [4.2](#sec:knowledgeMining){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:knowledgeMining"}, the proposed spatial game knowledge consisted of features and meta facts, and relied on the underlying board as well as artificial board areas. Furthermore, if possible, features could be backed with frequent item sets, improving their quality.\ Although a few ways of improving UCT with features were discussed throughout this publication, no specific was chosen for the proposed approach. Weights for feature classes, number of features and other different parameters susceptible to evolution were considered parts of the knowledge as well. The proposed evolution algorithm worked with individuals, conceptually being the agents, but practically being game knowledge instances their possessed. The self-play scheme, a part of the evolution, required those agents to be ready to conduct matches during every generation, right after the knowledge update phase.\ For the stated reasons, per-game knowledge has been designed as a single XML file, encapsulating features, item sets, and knowledge parameters. Other data about individuals, such as their evolution history or quality in respect to the objective function, were stored in small auxiliary files. This way, all agents shared one single executable, with different knowledge files supplied to be loaded.\ The structure of said XML knowledge files was simple: <Knowledge> <Parameters> ... </Parameters> <Player role="red"> <WinningFeatures> ... </WinningFeatures> <LoosingFeatures> ... </LoosingFeatures> </Player> <Player role="black"> ... </Player> </Knowledge> ##### Knowledge parameters The parameters section had the aforementioned knowledge parameters: from ways of using the knowledge, to particular weights. Of course the agent has been programmed to correctly interpret those. Winning and loosing feature lists were, possibly lengthy, lists of features correlated with winning and loosing respectively. Thus, the knowledge files could range from several kilobytes, to a few megabytes in size, depending on the number of features. An excerpt from a sample knowledge file, showing features and item sets, is shown in Figure [\[fig:xmlknow\]](#fig:xmlknow){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:xmlknow"}.\ The parameters, which were coded as chromosome genes, included: The basic form of using the knowledge, is for defining probability distribution for moves during pseudo-random playouts, according to the formula \[P(m_k|s_n) = \frac{\textit{score}(m_k)}{\sum_{i\in I} \textit{score}(m_i)},\] with \(\textit{score}(m_i)=\textit{baseValue} + \textit{winningFeatures}(m_i)-\textit{loosingFeatures}(m_i)\), and \(s_n\) denoting the state, \(m_k\) denotes one of the legal moves. First-feature scoring is the method of, when being in state, scoring a move with the first matching feature (from a sorted list). The default knowledge scoring method goes over the whole list and sums weights of matching features. The parameter for using features also in the selection phase, employs Formula [\[formula:progressiveUCT\]](#formula:progressiveUCT){reference-type="ref" reference="formula:progressiveUCT"} (Subsection [2.6.2](#subsec:incorporation){reference-type="ref" reference="subsec:incorporation"}). ## Performance Tunning The following section explains important choices made during system setup and tests. It also provides estimates of overhead introduced by the tested ideas. Such things are important in correct interpretation of test results presented in Chapter [6](#chap:tests){reference-type="ref" reference="chap:tests"}, as well as in evaluation of the system. ### Choosing Game Clocks Since GGP agents are assumed to adapt to an arbitrary game, they are naturally assumed to adapt to an arbitrary game length (expressed as startclock and playclock). However, when doing any kind of game-specific agent adaptation, be that mining knowledge, training an evaluation function, etc., it may be important to choose right game clocks. Keeping in mind that UCT converges in time to the same result as minimax, the impact of using additional knowledge (which is usually not that accurate) might diminish in time, eventually worsening the performance.\ As explained in Section [2.7](#sec:reasoning){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:reasoning"}, the reasoning engine plays a crucial role in the agent's computational performance. By profiling the GGP agent made for this publication with Google Performance Tools , it turned out that reasoning alone accounts for most of the time spent by the agent during each turn in a bare UCT agent. However, performance of reasoning engines may vary greatly, even by orders of magnitude. For instance, a GTC-based agent can do as much reasoning during 1 s as, elsewhere identical, Prolog-based one in 44 s in 8puzzle.[^11]\ Another factor to consider is the complexity of the GDL rule sheet. Reasoning in games, described with rule sheets large resulting in large game trees (chess, checkers, Othello), tends to be much slower in terms of games/s or states/s, than in case of simpler ones (Blocks World, Tic-tac-toe). For instance, GTC-based agent can conduct about 3/s full random playouts of Othello, whereas for Connect Four the same agent would conduct as many as 2300/s, even though Othello playouts are approximately three times long in the number of turns. Additionally, duration of random playouts made by a human player would probably be far closer in both cases.\ One simple approach, that seems to be favored during various GGP competitions, is to choose game clocks similar to those which human players would use. Computations made for this publication involved thousands of regular GGP matches. The chosen clocks were fairly low, usually both startclock and playclock were set as 10 s. As stated above, clocks are very relative, especially when taking advantage of GTC. To investigate the impact of knowledge, on games with game graphs heavily explored by UCT, as well as those with graphs explored only a little, the set of games chosen for evaluation included games with efficient and inefficient reasoning engines. When developing knowledge with a particular application in mind, all said factors should be considered when choosing right clocks for simulations. ### Used Hardware Even though the participants of a GGP match (agents and Gamemaster) are able to play over network, and the knowledge mining involves many computers connected to a local area network, the preferred method of conducting matches is to have the agents and the Gamemaster run on one machine and communicate through the loopback interface. This approach has strong advantages: - it evens out RAM usage on participating machines, since even a low number of Gamemasters might deplete the resources, - match fault rate is lower, because players are not susceptible to unexpected delays in communication, - agents running on the same processor should obtain roughly the same amount of processing power, than when run on different hardware. Computations made for this publication where conducted in LAN consisted of 28 workstations with the following configuration: - Intel Core2 Quad Q8300 @ 2.50 GHz, 4 GB RAM, Debian 7.0, gcc 4.7.1 (14 workstations), - Intel Core i5-2400 @ 3.10 GHz, 4 GB RAM, Debian 7.0, gcc 4.7.2 (14 workstations). Both CPU models present on those machines were equipped with 4 cores. With one computer being the miner/server, there were 54 matches of a 2-player game possible to conduct in parallel (4 agents occupying each of the remaining 27 workstations). With 10 s clocks, the computations usually took 1-3 h/generation, depending on the game.\ Further improvements to the computation time might be easily achieved by rewriting the mining component in C++ and/or distributing the mining on more workstations.\ The current design of the agent is single-threaded. To achieve the best utilization of resources, the number of players run in parallel on one machine should match the number of core. However, operating system's scheduling policy should also be taken into account. ### Knowledge Overhead Evaluation of algorithms and computation methods naturally should take their implementation into account. The GGP Agent is designed to work with different reasoning engines-each supplying it's `Fact` class. To keep things simple, the knowledge module operates on facts where object constants are strings. However, GTC uses internally simple types (`int`s) instead, to keep the reasoning faster and lower memory usage. The knowledge module makes frequent conversions to coordinates, i.e. for a fact `(mark 1 2 x)` it will return a vector \(\rowvec{2}{1}{2}^\top\). With GTC, it has to make frequent unnecessary intermediate conversions to strings (which is not the case with YAP Prolog, where strings are being returned by default by YAP library calls).\ Of course, the mentioned overhead takes up precious turn time, which could be used for more iterations of MCTS, thus artificially limiting available turn time. The real performance of knowledge-based players, with more efficient implementation, should be much higher than reported. To overcome this problem, the framework could be further modified to have the reasoning engine supply also it's own metric module. ### Fitting GTC Within Startclock Even though this publication assumes, that large amounts of time are available for knowledge development before the start of the game, it is still important to evaluate application of GTC to ordinary GGP matches. In such matches, the GTC module should manage to analyze game rules, generate C++ source code, compile it to a custom reasoning machine, and have the agent load it, during the startclock phase.\ Table [5.1](#tab:gtcTimes){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:gtcTimes"} summarizes resources required for GTC to complete for various GDL rulesheets. For tested games, GDL managed to finish roughly within 10 s startclock with an optimized version, and within 5 s startclock with an unoptimized one, on an ordinary machine. Both code generation and compilation were single-threaded, therefore the agent could run a few mirrors of GTC Generator (with different optimization levels set) in parallel. They would still share IO, but the tests revealed that most of the time spent on generation and compilation was spent in the user space, so it should not be an issue. Moreover, the agent could even temporarily load Prolog and begin the computations using remaining cores from the beginning, with an option to replace the reasoning engine on the fly, to achieve the best utilization of resources. [\[tab:gtcTimes\]]{#tab:gtcTimes label="tab:gtcTimes"} ## UCT Architectural Issues {#sec:agentArchitecture} This section presents some technical aspects of a typical UCT-based General Game Playing agent, in respect to the agent implemented in GGP Spatium. As such agents have dominated the AAAI Competition[^12], UCT might be considered a de facto standard for constructing such systems. ### The \(C\) Constant The first obvious adjustment is a proper \(C\) value (often denoted also as \(k\)). Recalling the original UCT formula [\[eq:ucb\]](#eq:ucb){reference-type="ref" reference="eq:ucb"}, the value of a move is made of two components: it's winning average and the UCB bonus. The longer the move is omitted, the higher the bonus, so it keeps the agent from forgetting about unpromising but not thoroughly investigated moves.\ The bonus is multiplied by the \(C\) factor which, as many note , serves as a exploration/exploitation parameter. Higher values increase the bonus thus emphasizing exploration, whereas low values favor exploitation.  used an empirically set constant \(C=40\), 2007 version of Ary used \(C=50\) . The value was later changed to \(C=40\) for multiplayer games, and \(C=100\) for single player  (obviously to favor exploration in search problems). Those values were also determined experimentally. Also, the authors report that attempts to set the constant dynamically after the rules analysis did not bring good results.\ used \(C=\sqrt{2}\), which makes UCT use the exact UCB1 formula. notes that values close either 0 or 100 gave significantly worse results than a value in between.\ Finally,  point out that, when applying UCT/MCTS to the Game of Amazons (or any particular game), the constant should be accordant with the problem; in one of the studies, empirically chosen \(C=0.35\) was used.\ The agent of GGP Spatium used a fixed value \(C=40\), based on the claim that changing the value through learning does not bring satisfactory results. Chapter [6](#chap:tests){reference-type="ref" reference="chap:tests"} unveils, however, an interesting shift in number of visited nodes under the influence of game knowledge. It might indicate that shorter simulation episodes take place, because of frequently choosing same paths in the selection phase, and the agent focuses more on exploitation. ### Internal Policies ##### Selection phase An extended policy, UCB1-TUNED  is reported to perform even better than UCB1 policy . The upper confidence bound for UCB1-TUNED is \[\sqrt{\frac{\ln n}{n_j}\min\left\{\frac{1}{4},V_j(n_j)\right\}}.\] Many other policies have been developed over the years. UCB2  for instance has a better confidence bound, but is more complex. Other widely-known policies include \(\epsilon_n-GREEDY\) and UCB1-NORMAL.\ Also, the first policy with an upper confidence value, developed by Lai and Robbins in 1985  for the multiarmed bandit problem, was better than UCB in terms of the expected bound, but was proved only for a certain class of distributions[^13]. In  an interesting approach of learning the best policy for a given problem was examined. ##### Tree node expansion Two-phase tree searching in MCTS, consisting of the selection phase and the simulation phase, has the advantage of memory conservation. Only the first phase requires storing information about the states, such as detailed descriptions, hash values, visit counters, average payouts, etc. It is, however, unclear how to proceed with extending game tree with new nodes. Ideally, stored nodes should be the ones visited the most. Coulom  mentions a best-first tree growing policy: - Start with a root only - Whenever a random simulation goes through a node, which was already visited once, create a new node to the next move in that simulation Using the policy, the search tree becomes unbalanced (in terms of branches' heights), therefore it adapts to more promising states\ Some of the leading agents like Ary  and CadiaPlayer  use a slightly simplified version of that policy, where a node is being added once for each playout, and it is the first one encountered on a search path, which is not already stored.\ It gets complicated for agents with highly efficient reasoning engines, hard-coded or at least not Prolog-based, which are not doing any real reasoning apart from calculating states and moves. Since they rapidly switch game states, the node-per-playout policy, especially for heavily branched games, might lead to quick exhaustion of available memory. For instance, the Game of Amazons agent  mentioned earlier, has a policy of adding a node after as many as 40 visits to a parent node. Interestingly, the threshold was not set to just save the memory. As noted in the paper, setting the threshold to 20 yielded slightly worse results, while decreasing it further to 5 lowered the winning percentage of the agent (of plays versus the test agent) from 80% to 65%.\ The agent implemented for this publication featured a fixed policy of one node for each playout. Resulting transposition tables were rather small (in the number of states), yet they have been prepared to selectively adapt to size restrictions. Section [6.4](#sec:testsTT){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:testsTT"} discusses sizes of transposition tables obtained during tests. ##### Opponent modeling At default, every opponent is assumed to play with the same UCT strategy. In the minimax heuristic, the algorithm has to alternate between the players on consecutive plies of the tree. In UCT, every opponent can be modeled with the same strategy. For each possible move a state should thus hold not the average payout, but the average payouts for all players. It has a reflection in game knowledge, since features are mined and stored for each player separately. # Validation {#chap:tests} This chapter contains detailed description of tests made to evaluate the ideas proposed in Chapter [4](#chap:keyIdeas){reference-type="ref" reference="chap:keyIdeas"}. They have been carried out, using GGP Spatium framework, in a local area network (the testing environment is discussed in Chapter [5](#chap:testingPlatform){reference-type="ref" reference="chap:testingPlatform"}). ## Tested Games {#sec:testedGames} All rule sheets mentioned in this publication (with the exception of rule sheets modified with the Euclidean extension) come from Dresden GGP Server  game database. Only a few games were chosen for the most time-consuming tests (preparing game knowledge through evolution): *amazons.kif*, *checkers.kif*, *connectfour.kif*, *cubicup.kif*, *othello.kif*. They have been enhanced with the proposed Euclidean GDL extension. The extension, however, does not guarantee immediate compatibility with a rule sheet. It took minor changes to make three of them conform: amazons.kif : -A turn consists of moving a piece and shooting an arrow. Turns have been split in half, letting the player move and shoot in separate, though subsequent turns. The opponent is forced to wait (by playing `noop`) for two subsequent turns. This change altered the game automaton, while preserving semantics. It also sped up the reasoning and considerably lowered branching factor from around 500 to \(\sqrt{500}\), at the cost of doubling the length of the game. checkers.kif : -The rule sheet required specifying a piece location and destination to make a move. Moreover, for double and triple jumps, intermediate fields also had to be specified, i.e. `(doublejump bp 3 2 3 3 3 4)` moves a piece from field \((3,2)\) to field \((3,4)\). Move functors have been made into arguments, and dummy variables have been added, so all move sentences would have equal number of arguments and a common functor `mark`. The previous example would become `(mark doublejump bp dummy dummy 3 2 3 3 3 4)`. connectfour.kif : -It suffices to chose a column to make a move. The second dimension, as well as piece type, was implicitly added to the move as well. `(drop ?x)` became `(play ?x ?y ?piece)`. To avoid confusion in the remaining sections, names of the rule sheets modified to meet the needs of the Euclidean extensions end with.ext.kif, e.g. *tictactoe.ext.kif*.\ [\[tab:testedGames\]]{#tab:testedGames label="tab:testedGames"} Table [6.1](#tab:testedGames){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:testedGames"} summarizes rule files chosen for knowledge evolution. Descriptions and complete rule sheets of less-known tested games are presented in Appendix [\[apdx:rulesheets\]](#apdx:rulesheets){reference-type="ref" reference="apdx:rulesheets"}. ## Compiled Code ### mGDL Conformance {#subsec:mgdlTest} Algorithm [\[alg:mgdl-check\]](#alg:mgdl-check){reference-type="ref" reference="alg:mgdl-check"} has been used to resolve conformance with mGDL for a particular rule sheet. The algorithm tries to unify literals found in rules' tails with other rules' heads, first checking functors and arities. Unificators are being examined; if all variables unify with constants or other variables, the rule sheet is mGDL compatible. If there are exceptions, the result of the algorithm is inconclusive, for there is no guarantee that such an unification would ever occur during the real reasoning.\ A set of 270 GDL games from Dresden GGP Server  has been checked with the aforementioned algorithm for mGDL conformance. Table [\[tab:mgdlCompat\]](#tab:mgdlCompat){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:mgdlCompat"} presents the results. Rule sheets, which do not immediately conform to mGDL, are easy to alter; in all cases, it would take only minor changes, not significantly extending nor complicating the rule sheets.\ [\[tab:mgdlCompat\]]{#tab:mgdlCompat label="tab:mgdlCompat"} ### GTC Performance {#subsec:gtcPerformance} The raw performance of reasoning engines has been measured with GTC Game Runner, tool made solely for benchmarking purposes. It measures the average performance of a particular reasoning engine during random plays. With this tool, some of GDL v1 games have been tested. It should be noted that GTC reasoning engines failed to build for some games, because of minor incapabilities of used implementation of the GTC translation scheme. Table [6.2](#tab:gtcperformance){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:gtcperformance"} summarizes achieved results.\ [\[tab:gtcperformance\]]{#tab:gtcperformance label="tab:gtcperformance"} GTC v1 yielded satisfactory results, but only for shallow and wide reasoning trees. Google CPU Profiler[^14] was used to determine the cause of this behavior. As it turned out, each time a fact was processed, a join operation took place (exemplary join might be found in Subsection [4.1.4](#subsec:database){reference-type="ref" reference="subsec:database"}), and the overall cost of all the join operations was the biggest bottleneck of all. The approach turned successful only for small games, where variable tables were short. More efficient data structures are required for more complex games with GTC v1. ## Game Knowledge Development This section presents tests concerned with spatial features and the evolutionary algorithm. Impact of features on the agent's computational performance and quality of plays is established, along with purposefulness of the evolution. At the end, crucial evolved parameters are summed up. ### Evolution Parameters Because the genetic algorithm utilized by the knowledge miner is based on SGA, parameters with regular to SGA values have been employed: Feature weights were assigned based on their \(\phi\) coefficients. ### Objective Function The point of mining the knowledge is to develop the knowledge file, which would improve the agent's play. It is not clear how to artificially measure the agent's skill; the chosen approach was to make a bare UCT agent (that is a one having no knowledge) a baseline agent, with whom scoring matches would be played. Then, after a certain number of plays, a conclusion about the agent's performance might have been drawn. The objective function has been thus formulated, as an average win percentage of the agent, in matches versus a bare UCT agent. Of course, the accuracy depends on the number of conducted matches.\ Reliable scoring of the agents is very resource-consuming. Matches usually end with a binary result; thus, the score might be modeled with the binomial distribution. It takes nearly 400 matches, to achieve a margin of error of circa 5% when scoring one single agent.[^15] Since the impact of an agent on the next generation diminished with it's score, it was crucial to score reliably the fittest individuals.\ To conserve resources, the agents were scored in rounds. During each round, \(m\) matches were conducted between each individual and the bare UCT agent. Only the best performing half of the agents qualified for the next round. The tournament ended, when there was one individual left. Rounds allowed to conduct over half of the matches less, than when scoring all the agents with the same number of matches. Figure [\[fig:tournamentConvergence\]](#fig:tournamentConvergence){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:tournamentConvergence"} shows agent's fitness during an exemplary tournament.\ Another investigated way of scoring the agents was to have the agents play between themselves. It also had a similar benefit of cutting the number of matches in half (for 2-player games, since every match gave feedback to both of the players). Early test, however, gave significantly worse results in this approach. Game records were of lower quality, but most importantly, the practical confidence interval was much wider. Although there was a strong correlation between the results of the tournaments, and results of plays versus a bare UCT agent, the correlation was not perfect and added to the confidence intervals. The approach worked well on early generations, where individuals differed between each other. In the later ones, the error was to great to reliably score the agents, with only minor differences in scores. ### Particular Evolution Cases To evaluate the system of evolutionary feature mining and utilization in games as a whole, complete evolution episodes were carried for games listed in Section [6.1](#sec:testedGames){reference-type="ref" reference="sec:testedGames"}. Early tests reported poor performance; CPU profiling revealed a major overhead on memory management in the knowledge module (compared with regular, GTC-based agent). The overhead can be mitigated in the GTC version of the reasoner, by integrating the knowledge module, so that during each random playout no extra state objects would be created and passed from the reasoner to the agent. To manage with the overhead, a simple handicap has been introduced: each bare-UCT player had half the time available to the knowledge-based one. The handicap has been chosen based on rough overhead estimates. The following sections contain information about the obtained results. #### The Game of Amazons The Game of Amazons becomes very costly to test in the modified version, were turns are split in half and average random game has length of 120 turns. Initially, only 10 generations were carried; early generations did not seem to bring any significant gain. Figure [\[fig:amazonsQ\]](#fig:amazonsQ){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:amazonsQ"} presents best agent's fitnesses. It is worth noticing, that the final best individual did not feature progressive widening; after all, branching factor of the tested version has been lowered.\ #### Checkers As it is a case with rule sheets having highly inefficient corresponding reasoning engines, even though GTC has improved the performance, UCT tree search was shallow. Under this conditions, spatial features gave immediate gain, which conversely has not been further improved by the evolution (Figure [\[fig:checkersQ\]](#fig:checkersQ){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:checkersQ"}). #### Connect Four Short match lengths in Connect Four encouraged longer evolution. However, it failed to bring any significant gain within the set handicap (Figure [\[fig:connect4Q\]](#fig:connect4Q){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:connect4Q"}). While the opponent had half the time as startclock and playclock, final transposition tables had on average 71% states less in the individual, indicating that the knowledge overhead caused more serious slowdowns than expected.\ #### Cubicup Spatial features gave an immediate rise in quality of plays of around 5-10% in the first generation, which was evolved to around 15% (Figure [\[fig:cubicupQ\]](#fig:cubicupQ){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:cubicupQ"}). Transposition tables of the best knowledge-equipped individuals had about 40-70% states of the baseline agent's TTs, with 44% in the final individual, what speaks in favor of the 0.5 handicap. #### Othello With games shorter than 64 turns, Othello has been tested with slightly larger game clocks. Nonetheless, unreasonably slow reasoning engine resulted in shallow tree search. Feature system seemed to just make up for the overhead-average transposition table sizes were around 45% smaller in knowledge agents than in the baseline agent. Curiously, among mined features were some features common among Othello players and programs, like those promoting playing in the corners or along the edges. Those few features alone should be responsible for most gains from the knowledge. It might be the case, that other features, which seem relevant in the mining phase, actually worsened agent's plays. ### Feature Utilization With no doubt, well evolved feature set gives an advantage to the agent. The purpose of this section is to determine how the features are being used.\ As stated in Subsection [4.2.2](#subsec:features){reference-type="ref" reference="subsec:features"}, the features fall into 7 categories. Distribution of those categories among the best players is shown in Figure [\[fig:featureDistrib\]](#fig:featureDistrib){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:featureDistrib"}. All feature classes occur in the fittest individuals. However, currently there is no method to measure the real per-feature impact on playouts (how frequently a feature is matched, what is the average payout of the most frequent and infrequent matches, etc.). With such data at hand, it would be feasible to fine-tune feature list by tweaking their weights.\ Number of features also plays an important role; recalling poor performance of the knowledge module, higher counts of features might not report the expected fitness. The maximum number of features, which is susceptible to evolution, ranges 0-500 for all the players. For instance, for a 2-player game, the total number ranges 0-2000, as each player has both good and bad feature lists. Figure [\[fig:featureNumConnect4\]](#fig:featureNumConnect4){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:featureNumConnect4"} shows the evolution of an average number of features in population in Connect Four. The number grows in time, until the limit is reached. The maximum number of features increases after the knowledge files have been saturated. It may be expected that this trend would continue with next generations. ### Knowledge Summary The impact of the knowledge turned out hard to measure; frequent passing game states to the knowledge module resulted in memory management overhead of around 45% to 71%, seriously crippling the agent's performance (Table [6.3](#tab:testedGamesResults){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:testedGamesResults"}). Nonetheless, after applying a handicap to the baseline agent, the evolution took off. Spatial features, considering performance issues, brought competitive gains, especially in harder games. For instance in checkers, poor performance of the reasoning engine resulted in extremely shallow tree search. Spatial features improved the play substantially, again considering the applied handicap.\ However, preliminary tests with larger game clocks brought significantly worse results. This is expected, since such a small number of game features, limits their expressive power, therefore skewing payout distributions obtained through random playouts. Perhaps it would be a good idea to limit the impact of knowledge in time, not only in the selection phase, but in the simulation phase as well. Another obvious improvement would be extending the system with new feature classes, and proper implementation adding knowledge support on the level of the reasoning machine.\ [\[tab:testedGamesResults\]]{#tab:testedGamesResults label="tab:testedGamesResults"} ## Transposition Tables {#sec:testsTT} The purpose of the following section was to determine usefulness of linked transposition tables. To achieve the goal, matches of bare UCT players were carried for different games with various transposition table sizes. Both types of agents, that is with linked and ordinary transposition tables played against each other. Obtained results have been presented in Table [6.4](#tab:ttPerformance){reference-type="ref" reference="tab:ttPerformance"}.\ [\[tab:ttPerformance\]]{#tab:ttPerformance label="tab:ttPerformance"} The bound on transposition table size has to be much lower than the maximal obtained size during unbounded simulations, to see any difference between the two types of TTs. It should be even lower, than an average number of states expanded during a single turn. It is costly to test reliably with hundreds of matches, games with long clocks that could better illustrate the effect. Thus, small game clocks were tested. Linked transposition tables gave a small improvement over randomly-emptied ones. Google CPU Profiler  reported negligible cost of handling the additional linked list.\ The difference in performance between the two types of TTs might be expected to increase with further limiting the size of tables or increasing turn time. However, as long as the reasoning engine is weak, memory exhaustion should not be an issue. Furthermore, MCTS suited to the Game of Amazons in  achieved better results with expansions policy as high as expanding by one node every 40 visits, so even with efficient reasoning, bounding the memory might not be necessary. On the other hand, it is easy to imagine a chess player, equipped with a custom engine, that could benefit from linked TTs a lot.\ ## Validation Summary The approach proposed in this thesis proved to be valuable. Generated C++ reasoning machines offered significant speed ups of 2300% on average over YAP Prolog, while retaining compatibility and fairly low resource usage. With improved pace of matches, it became more feasible to conduct long computations. The evolutionary algorithm, along with simple mining methods, working on a very basic set of spatial board features, were competitive with the standard UCT algorithm and noticeably improved the quality of plays. Linked transposition tables, while introducing a negligible overhead, brought performance gains only with restrictive limits on their sizes. However, they still might be useful for agents playing longer matches. # Summary {#chap:summary} ## Conclusions This publication pursues a goal of designing and evaluating an efficient General Game Playing agent, at the same time relaxing some limitations imposed by GGP specification. Perhaps, the crucial change is carrying time-consuming computations, like mining game knowledge, before the actual match. With this approach in mind, GGP can find it's application in developing efficient problem solvers, rather than versatile but weak players.\ Chapter [2](#chap:sota){reference-type="ref" reference="chap:sota"} presents the latests and most important research in the field of GGP/MCTS. Since MCTS is strongly connected to GGP as the main method of choice, the research made for particular games is highly relevant to the topic. Chapter [3](#chap:problem){reference-type="ref" reference="chap:problem"} contains formulation of the problem and initial discussion of it's purposefulness and methods. Chapter [4](#chap:keyIdeas){reference-type="ref" reference="chap:keyIdeas"} introduces the new approach, formulated in the thesis as a solution for the problem. It consists of a revised, GDL to C++ translation scheme, proposition of spatial feature-based general game knowledge and an evolutionary algorithm for mining features and tunning knowledge parameters. Chapter [5](#chap:testingPlatform){reference-type="ref" reference="chap:testingPlatform"} starts with an introduction of GGP Spatium-a versatile framework created to evaluate the approach presented in this publication. It consists of many components, parts of which can be easily modified, like playing algorithms and reasoning machines swapped in the agent. Chapter [6](#chap:tests){reference-type="ref" reference="chap:tests"} finally presents the results of tests constructed in order to verify the approach. GTC translation scheme proves valuable and shows a substantial improvement over the original approach. Additionally, spatial board knowledge and the evolutionary algorithm, while simple, improve the agent's performance.\ All objectives of this thesis are met. The developed agent's leanness manifests itself through efficient reasoning with GTC, possible memory conservation with linked transposition tables, and fewer dependencies, by making Prolog libraries optional. It also brings a shift in the philosophy, by separating learning from playing. The GDL translation scheme starts with an introduction of mGDL-a simplified version of GDL, yet much easier to handle during the translation process. Though mGDL is closer to Datalog than GDL, high compatibility with existing GDL rule sheets has been retained; 97% of over 250 tested rule sheets meet the conditions without any modifications. GDL to C++ (GTC) translation scheme proves valuable and shows a substantial improvement over the original approach from , with performance gains ranging from 28% to 7300%, with 2300% on average over YAP Prolog. However, the complex games-while managing to undergo translation and compilation under few seconds-are the ones show the smallest improvements. Still, GTC is competitive with other leading methods of performance reasoning for GDL rule sheets . The agent also features linked transposition tables-self-managing transposition tables, which seem to suit MCTS's adaptive searching nature. Linked TTs bring slight performance gains over the very basic design from , but only under restrictive size limits. Nonetheless, the agent might act either as a thorough problem solver, when run with large clocks and TT, or as a compact agent doing shallow search within small memory, which only adds to it's versatility.\ Learning the game before conducting a match has been successfully realized through the evolutionary algorithm extending SGA , knowledge mining through \(\phi\) coefficient with modified Apriori algorithm  based loosely on , and spatial board knowledge. Despite low, yet steady quality gains of slightly over 50% to 70% matches won against the baseline agent, the real potential is much greater. Spatial features might give satisfactory results as soon as in the first generation. With efficient implementation, more feature classes and accurate system of scoring the features and choosing the best ones, the knowledge-based players should largely outperform bare UCT ones. One other interesting phenomenon is the discrepancy of evolved UCT constants: they range from 15.4 to 56.7, with an average value of 35.98. As for tree expanding policies, there seems to be no universal tendency towards more frequent or seldom expands. Game knowledge relies on the concept of a board, which in turn requires yet another small modification to GDL, allowing to supply game meta data. Feature system, while simple, allows abstraction of move characteristics inspired by computer Go , otherwise hard to grasp. Only few feature and meta data classes were described and implemented; in reality, tens or even hundreds of features might be added to the system.\ As the tests indicate, GGP Spatium meets the criteria formulated as the problem addressed in this publication. The framework presents a different approach than existing ones , and constitutes an extensive platform for developing game playing agents and problem solvers. A few weakness of GDL have been revealed during tests: the lack of meta data mechanism, arithmetics, or perhaps hasty inclusion of function constants, which unnecessarily complexes the language. Performance of reasoning machines, while getting better, still falls behind custom-written code. It could be more convenient to supply rule sheets along with pre-written libraries with bindings for the most popular programming languages. This way, the quality of plays should substantially improve, but more importantly, it would refocus research on different methods closer to real-world applications. Lastly, the mechanism of guiding the machine in abstracting information with carefully crafted features seems to have potential; the system presented in this publication is small and simple, but could be easily extended, mimicking various human abstraction skills. ## Perspectives This publications, through the proposed approach and obtained results, points interesting perspectives for further research. ##### Further GDL development GDL would benefit greatly from simple additions like arithmetics or a system of meta data. Such meta data might be easily added and maintained by the GGP community. Agents, which do not support such data, would simply ignore it. The data might describe various properties: from the mentioned boards to branching factors, different move classes, and other characteristics. To keep things simple, all meta data might be supplied within a single new restricted functor, i.e. `meta/1`. ##### High-performance reasoning engines There is also much room for improvement in reasoning engines. Instantiation is certainly of great value, since the instantiated output-being itself valid GDL-could also be supplied to other engines, i.e. to GTC. Partial instantiation heuristics could play great role in such methods. Another directions is parallelization-not only for many CPUs, but also GPUs. A temporary solution might be, however, as simple as providing human-written libraries for rapid state switching, along with associated rule sheets. ##### Extensive system of spatial features Spatial features clearly have potential for improving agents' performance. It might be the case, that only the initial population would suffice to develop good enough knowledge, without doing much costly computations. The spatial feature system requires a much thorough investigation, as this publication nearly outlines the idea. More feature classes should be implemented, and a system estimating each feature's usefulness might be more accurate, than the genetic algorithm which scores the agent merely as a black box. Also, a proper implementation taking advantage i.e. of GTC's memory-efficient internal state representation is crucial for further development. ##### On-demand AI GGP has brought a vision of AIs, created on-demand for specific problems, closer than even before. GGP Spatium also attempts on being a toolkit that pursues this point of view. It makes possible to evolve, generate and compile the agent itself entirely as a library, without any external dependencies-a network-interfaced, on-demand problem solver. [^1]: It is enough to include classic board games and even discretized versions of some arcade games. [^2]: At the time of writing, Dresden GGP Server  holds \(21\) GDL-II rule sheets, which account for \(7\%\) of the total. [^3]: In comparison, Deep Blue (1997) could calculate 200 million positions per second . [^4]: Source files as large as of megabyte size were reported. [^5]: <http://ggpserver.general-game-playing.de/> [^6]: The metaphor of flattening nested expressions was borrowed from Ruby's `flatten` method for arrays. [^7]: Part of Google Performance Tools . [^8]: This particular method allowed for quick calculation of the hash, based on the fact's arguments. It also took advantage of the sparse nature of the values. [^9]: A common library format for Unix systems. [^10]: Terminology borrowed from the `java.util` Java package. [^11]: Detailed performance comparison is shown in Subsection [6.2.2](#subsec:gtcPerformance){reference-type="ref" reference="subsec:gtcPerformance"}. [^12]: In the AAAI Competitions held in years 2007-2012, with non-simulation-based agent being among the finalists only once (Fluxplayer, 2007). [^13]: Including popular ones like the Gaussian Distribution or the Poisson Distribution. [^14]: Part of Google Performance Tools . [^15]: Assuming 95% confidence interval and estimating the interval with a normal distribution.

{'timestamp': '2014-01-24T02:01:23', 'yymm': '1401', 'arxiv_id': '1401.5813', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5813'}

# Introduction Let us consider the typical method of interaction between buyers and sellers in classified settings. When people want to sell something, they advertise by way of a physical or virtual announcement. For example, an individual puts up a flyer in a neighborhood to attract local buyers. People who are interested in the classified listing contact the owner either by phone or email. The two parties communicate until the deal is consummated or falls through. In this paper, we address problems related to security, privacy, design in available classifieds websites, and then propose design and implementation of Serefind: A social networking for classifieds. # Background The growing prevalence of Internet access has enabled classified communications to emerge online. There are hundreds of web-based services for this kind of classifieds communication. For the sake of simplicity, we will only review top classifieds websites according to alexa-web rank. One popular example is Craigslist[^1], which according to alexa-web rank, is ranked 45th in the world. This website contains classified data on a large scale. It has various problems related to security, privacy, design, and usability. There exist hundreds of cases showing that use of this website has lead to crimes such as kidnapping, threats, and prostitution. Another example is EBay Classifieds[^2] which also facilitates classified transactions. Some sites such as Amazon are e-commerce websites where people can buy items, but these have a different structure than classified websites. Some social networking websites such as Facebook provide a framework for third-party classified applications to leverage an existing social graph. Facebook Marketplace[^3] powered by Oodle, a third-party company, is an example of this kind of application. Third party association creates various privacy related issues. # Design Goals Our design goal aimed to create a social classifieds site that satisfies the following constraints: ### Security and Privacy {#security-and-privacy .unnumbered} The identity of anyone who uses the website should be verified to reduce crime. For example, on Craigslist, interactions can occur without thorough verification on either side. If an issue arises, since there is no verification, it is difficult to trace the individuals involved. Furthermore, all websites should strive to meet the web based security standards. ### Social-Graph {#social-graph .unnumbered} Today we live in the social networking era where we conduct social experiences online via computers, hand-held devices, and gaming consoles. Social networking is changing our way of communication, allowing us to easily share information with our friends, family and peers. Online marketplaces can be visualized using various social graph models. Social network and commerce networks are interconnected to each other. To make it simple, we present a social graph that can be visualized using a graph with nodes and edges. Node represents be owner (circle) and classifieds stuff (square). A solid edge represents ownership of a listing, and a dashed edge represents interest in a listing from a peer. Total message count for communication regarding a listing is represented with a number above the edge. One of the design goals is to follow the above social graph model (See figure 1). ### Design, HCI and User Interfaces {#design-hci-and-user-interfaces .unnumbered} Sites should use suitable Human-Computer Interaction techniques to enrich the user experience. Users should be able to provide information in a user-friendly manner. Classified data should be browsed with usable search interfaces. Communication between users should be easy and efficient. As for advertisements, minimal use of banner and text ads would enhance the user experience. In addition, the site should be aesthetically pleasing, on par with or more so than existing classifieds sites, while maintaining an aura of safety and minimalism. ### Ranking Algorithm {#ranking-algorithm .unnumbered} The site should use a sophisticated ranking algorithm to display appropriate and relevant results from a large database. For instance, we can incorporate serefind social graph elements such as interactions and communications to provide an improved ranking algorithm. In the next sections, we will present the design and implementation of site by describing user-interfaces, ranking algorithms, and the design of communications. # Serefind System Figure [\[fig:serefind\]](#fig:serefind){reference-type="ref" reference="fig:serefind"} shows the Serefind user-interfaces. Serefind has three main user-interfaces 1) Search interface 2) Profile, and 3) Communication. In addition we have authentication, settings and help interfaces. Serefind users have to register with a well-defined email address affiliated with a network. For example the user with **pramod\@cs.jhu.edu** will join **The Johns Hopkins University** network. This verification ensures security. The navigation bar at top of the site is used to access these sections. Users can set network, password and email settings. After registration and login, the user visits the **Search Page** (default home page) that displays recently added classified listings in the form of a **Newsfeed**. This is important because it shows users that the site is being used. By default, the Newsfeed is displayed based on personal preferences, such as location, network, and categories. We also provide a link to customize preferences. ## Profile In a social network, a user's **Profile** is a place where the user adds and manages posts (classifieds listings in our case). Profile UI and its elements can be used to signal other user nodes and connections. We had the following requirements for the Profile metaphor. ### Heterogeneous Data Sharing {#heterogeneous-data-sharing .unnumbered} To support all kind of heterogeneous classifieds data, we have developed a template based framework, where all the specification for categories can be written in the form of xml files. This approach assists to create new categories and their specification directly from users with administrative control (approval), without modifying the source code. Template also mentions specifications for the search. For example following code specifies **Event** category in the **event.xml** . Database stores information according to the XML definition. UI is displayed based on XML file. <schema id="O198" category="event" creator="admin"> <field input-type="textbox" data-type="text" visibility-in-search-filter="true">Title</field> <field data-type="date-time">Date and Time</field> <field>...</field> </schema> This is a unique approach compare to the existing websites such as Facebook, Twitter, etc., which only allow a user to post specific types of information. In theory, Serefind can be used to post any type of information beyond classifieds even tweet and Facebook like post. We just have to put related XML file with specifications in the system, and Serefind search and post interfaces will be changed automatically. In addition, We also implemented an interface in which users can request new categories and their respective fields. After approval from administrator, new categories can be part of Serefind without source code modification. <requestField category="event" data-type="currency" creator="user001">Cover Charge</requestField> ### Security and privacy {#security-and-privacy-1 .unnumbered} By default, at the Profile page, we do not display full name, location, photo, or any other information about a user. We simply display a username and set of listings. We do not show any messages regarding these listings. If the user is not signed in, most details such as description, user name are hidden by default. In addition, users can explore listings belonging to their own network. However public listings are visible to all the networks. ### Post listings {#post-listings .unnumbered} By default post interface shows HTML input elements for category, subcategory, tags, title, and description. The user can enter data in profile according to which classified category the data falls under. The Profile is designed using intelligent interactive methods to make data entry and repetitive data entry easier and more usable. After data is entered, addition of the entry is confirmed and the user is immediately able to add another listing. Users can add more input-fields according to their need. ### Manage Listings {#manage-listings .unnumbered} The user can manage listings by using the edit, delete, or hide links provided for each listing. We also provide an undo button if the user deletes or hides a listing by mistake. ### Navigation {#navigation .unnumbered} For a user to view the profile of another user on the lightbox and listing page, we provide a link to the owner's profile. Another way to access a specific user profile is to visit http://serefind.com/directory/profile/\[username\]. ### Other Interfaces {#other-interfaces .unnumbered} For a user to determine if their listings are being viewed, we display the number of views for each listing when the user visits profile. This allows the users to see how many people are viewing their listings and perhaps serves as impetus to make changes if the listing is not being viewed or the listing is being viewed and no responses are being generated. ## Search Interfaces Search interfaces play an important role for any data-oriented website or system. Researchers have attempted to improve conventional interfaces. We set the following requirements for Serefind to ensure optimized design and usability. ### Data Visualization {#data-visualization .unnumbered} Serefind is a data driven site. We provide few classified categories such as books, furniture, apparels electronics, housing, sales, service, and jobs. Without proper visualization and interface, users cannot interpret data and interact regarding data. We choose the following user interfaces to visualize classified data: 1. List View: Each listing contains basic information such as icon picture, title, user name of owner, description, network, category, subcategory, and date posted. More details is displayed in the left side of listings on mouse over on expand icon. 2. Thumbnails View: This is a visual search in which we only display pictures and title. 3. Map View: We used the Google Maps API to visualize location based classifieds data. This feature is useful when a user is searching for data in a particular location and is also useful in increasing the relevancy of data by showing listings which are nearby to the user. 4. Tabular View: In this view, results are displayed in a tabular format so that user can easily view and sort. 5. Item Pages: These pages contain the full set of details regarding a listing. A lightbox appears on the right side of the page when a user selects a listing by clicking on the title or picture. This lightbox method allows the users to preview the listing and decide whether he is interested in pursuing it further. It also provides a link to the listing page which contains complete details of that classified listing. 6. Lightbox: This is a simple overlay that appears when a user selects a listing. This helps to explore details without redirecting to the item-page. ### Page Scrolling {#page-scrolling .unnumbered} We use AJAX based infinite-scrolling method to see more results. During the scrolling, top and side navigation bars remain fixed. ### Sorting and Filters {#sorting-and-filters .unnumbered} We display category menus and search filters on the left side of the site. Tabular view also displays column-links for sorting the results. ### Navigation {#navigation-1 .unnumbered} How can a user reach appropriate results? We designed the interface in such a way that users can access information in three steps. In the first step, a query is invoked. The second stage is the browsing step, in which the search results are represented in a set of relevant listings displaying name, title, price, and description, and the user can browse these listings and select those which he is interested in. The third step involves the display of a lightbox when users select a listing. At this point, the user can communicate regarding a listing or go to the listing page to view more information. ### Communication {#communication .unnumbered} For users to communicate with owners during a search, We placed a message box at the bottom of the lightbox. ### Other Usability Factors {#other-usability-factors .unnumbered} How we ensure usability? We considered many usability-related problems for search interaction. For instance, to minimize user time and effort, we introduced an instant search on each page. Another simple usability problem is how the user can view multiple listings in an efficient manner. We use a lightbox or instant overlay at the right-hand side of the page so the user can view N listings with N clicks. ### Ranking Algorithm {#ranking-algorithm-1 .unnumbered} Our social classifieds system can be represented with a graph where owners and their classifieds listings are represented respectively as nodes and their edge relationships are described as a foreign-key in their respective relational database schemas. A classifieds \(C\) can be represented as \(C(O, c_{1}...c_{k})\) where \(O\) is the owner and \(c_{i}\) is the attribute such as title, description, price, username, etc. Search query can be represented as \(Q(U, q_{1}, q_{2}, q_{3}...q_{n})\) where \(U\) is the user who invokes the query and \(q_{i}\) is the search term(s). The similarity score between a query term \(Q\) and classified nodes \(C\) can be represented by \(Sim(Q,C) = \sum S(q_{i},C)\), which can be calculated by various Information-Retrieval (IR) based methods such as TF-IDF and RF. To provide better search experience, we used Location Based Service (LBS) and Query Expansion (QE) methods to optimize the search results. ## Design of Communication Communication is the basic step for any classifieds website or social networking website. On popular websites such as Facebook, Gmail, there exists an **Inbox** metaphor for communication. Serefind Message section contains interfaces for inbox, sent, and deleted messages. Our site was designed for classifieds, so the design of communication has the following constraints and requirements: ### Initiating a Communication {#initiating-a-communication .unnumbered} How does a user initiate communication? When users are searching, they can directly send a message to the owner using the send message UI at lightbox which appears when a user selects a listing. User can also send message on Item-Page. This creates a new message associated with a particular listing, thus automatically providing a context for each message exchanged. ### Security and Privacy {#security-and-privacy-2 .unnumbered} How we ensure privacy and security? Users can view and delete their own messages or comments. In addition, usernames are also in the form of a self-assigned moniker. Because each user has to register with a valid organizational email, we can track any issue or crime originating with a communication on the site. ### Context of Communication {#context-of-communication .unnumbered} What will the subject line be? Traditionally, in an inbox-based system, users are allowed to message any other user without any context or subject line. We present listing title as a subject or context for the communication. ### Notification {#notification .unnumbered} How can users access new messages? Serefind generates email notifications with a link to the inbox. Here we faced and experimented two different design options. Should we send an actual message within the email notification or we should provide a small message to login to the site to read a message? In the first approach, instead of reading a full message with a link for replying message, a few users sent the message to support\@serefind.com because after reading messages they were confused about the identity of the sender. The second approach seemed solid but slightly less convenient, because users have to login to the site to read complete messages. Within the site, we provide a notification on the top bar indicating number of new messages. ### Special-Cases {#special-cases .unnumbered} What happens when an owner deletes a listing? In this situation, users who previously communicated regarding a listing can view all past communications. However, users cannot send further messages to the owner of the deleted listing. # Conclusion We implemented Serefind using open-source technologies such as PHP and MySQL. To provide better user experience, we are using AJAX to lessen page refresh time at various places in the site. The site was launched at Johns Hopkins University. Currently site has approximately 10,000 users who belong to **The Johns Hopkins University** and nearby schools networks. At the time of the experiment, the website's alexa world web rank was 17,802,775 on a single network. We believe our work will be a better model of a classified system by focusing on design, usability, communication, search, and security. Serefind interface will create an optimized user experience for those interested in an alternative to the traditional classified system. A demo is available at **http://serefind.com/demo** [^1]: http://craigslist.org [^2]: http://ebayclassifieds.com [^3]: http://apps.facebook.com/marketplace/

{'timestamp': '2014-01-24T02:04:05', 'yymm': '1401', 'arxiv_id': '1401.5871', 'language': 'en', 'url': 'https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5871'}