input
stringlengths 381
708
| ground_truth_output
stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|
Follow the instruction.
### Instruction:
Determine if the text is consistent or inconsistent with the provided knowledge and dialogue history. If there is a logical conflict, respond with 'inconsistent'. If there is no conflict, respond with 'consistent'.
### Input:
Text: George W. Bush was the most recent U.S. president who was not selected as Time's Person of the Year
Knowledge: Gerald Ford was the most recent U.S. president who was not selected as Time's Person of the Year
Dialogue History: [Human]: Who was the most recent U.S. president who was not selected as Time's Person of the Year?
### Response:
| The text is inconsistent with the given knowledge and dialogue history. |
Follow the instruction.
### Instruction:
Determine if the text is consistent or inconsistent with the provided knowledge and dialogue history. If there is a logical conflict, respond with 'inconsistent'. If there is no conflict, respond with 'consistent'.
### Input:
Text: Bill Clinton was the most recent U.S. president who was not selected as Time's Person of the Year
Knowledge: Gerald Ford was the most recent U.S. president who was not selected as Time's Person of the Year
Dialogue History: [Human]: Who was the most recent U.S. president who was not selected as Time's Person of the Year?
### Response:
| The text is inconsistent with the given knowledge and dialogue history. |
Follow the instruction.
### Instruction:
Determine if the text is consistent or inconsistent with the provided knowledge and dialogue history. If there is a logical conflict, respond with 'inconsistent'. If there is no conflict, respond with 'consistent'.
### Input:
Text: All presidents have been selected as Time's Person of the Year
Knowledge: Gerald Ford was the most recent U.S. president who was not selected as Time's Person of the Year
Dialogue History: [Human]: Who was the most recent U.S. president who was not selected as Time's Person of the Year?
### Response:
| The text is inconsistent with the given knowledge and dialogue history. |
Follow the instruction.
### Instruction:
Determine if the text is consistent or inconsistent with the provided knowledge and dialogue history. If there is a logical conflict, respond with 'inconsistent'. If there is no conflict, respond with 'consistent'.
### Input:
Text: King Henry is holding a glove in the Portrait of Henry VIII
Knowledge: King Henry is holding a glove in the Portrait of Henry VIII
Dialogue History: [Human]: What is King Henry holding in the Portrait of Henry VIII?
### Response:
| The text is consistent with the given knowledge and dialogue history. |
Follow the instruction.
### Instruction:
Determine if the text is consistent or inconsistent with the provided knowledge and dialogue history. If there is a logical conflict, respond with 'inconsistent'. If there is no conflict, respond with 'consistent'.
### Input:
Text: King Henry is reaching for a dagger in the Portrait of Henry VIII
Knowledge: King Henry is holding a glove in the Portrait of Henry VIII
Dialogue History: [Human]: What is King Henry holding in the Portrait of Henry VIII?
### Response:
| The text is consistent with the given knowledge and dialogue history. |
Follow the instruction.
### Instruction:
Determine if the text is consistent or inconsistent with the provided knowledge and dialogue history. If there is a logical conflict, respond with 'inconsistent'. If there is no conflict, respond with 'consistent'.
### Input:
Text: King Henry is holding a turkey leg in the Portrait of Henry VIII
Knowledge: King Henry is holding a glove in the Portrait of Henry VIII
Dialogue History: [Human]: What is King Henry holding in the Portrait of Henry VIII?
### Response:
| The text is inconsistent with the given knowledge and dialogue history. |
Follow the instruction.
### Instruction:
Determine if the text is consistent or inconsistent with the provided knowledge and dialogue history. If there is a logical conflict, respond with 'inconsistent'. If there is no conflict, respond with 'consistent'.
### Input:
Text: No, Mother Teresa's canonisation happened after her death
Knowledge: No, Mother Teresa's canonisation happened after her death
Dialogue History: [Human]: Was Mother Teresa alive when she became a saint?
### Response:
| The text is consistent with the given knowledge and dialogue history. |
Follow the instruction.
### Instruction:
Determine if the text is consistent or inconsistent with the provided knowledge and dialogue history. If there is a logical conflict, respond with 'inconsistent'. If there is no conflict, respond with 'consistent'.
### Input:
Text: No, Mother Teresa's sainthood was bestowed posthumously
Knowledge: No, Mother Teresa's canonisation happened after her death
Dialogue History: [Human]: Was Mother Teresa alive when she became a saint?
### Response:
| The text is consistent with the given knowledge and dialogue history. |
Follow the instruction.
### Instruction:
Determine if the text is consistent or inconsistent with the provided knowledge and dialogue history. If there is a logical conflict, respond with 'inconsistent'. If there is no conflict, respond with 'consistent'.
### Input:
Text: No, the canonisation process started after she died
Knowledge: No, Mother Teresa's canonisation happened after her death
Dialogue History: [Human]: Was Mother Teresa alive when she became a saint?
### Response:
| The text is consistent with the given knowledge and dialogue history. |
Follow the instruction.
### Instruction:
Determine if the text is consistent or inconsistent with the provided knowledge and dialogue history. If there is a logical conflict, respond with 'inconsistent'. If there is no conflict, respond with 'consistent'.
### Input:
Text: Yes, Mother Teresa was alive when she became a saint
Knowledge: No, Mother Teresa's canonisation happened after her death
Dialogue History: [Human]: Was Mother Teresa alive when she became a saint?
### Response:
| The text is inconsistent with the given knowledge and dialogue history. |
Follow the instruction.
### Instruction:
Determine if the text is consistent or inconsistent with the provided knowledge and dialogue history. If there is a logical conflict, respond with 'inconsistent'. If there is no conflict, respond with 'consistent'.
### Input:
Text: Yes, Mother Teresa became a saint before her death
Knowledge: No, Mother Teresa's canonisation happened after her death
Dialogue History: [Human]: Was Mother Teresa alive when she became a saint?
### Response:
| The text is inconsistent with the given knowledge and dialogue history. |
Follow the instruction.
### Instruction:
Determine if the text is consistent or inconsistent with the provided knowledge and dialogue history. If there is a logical conflict, respond with 'inconsistent'. If there is no conflict, respond with 'consistent'.
### Input:
Text: Yes, Bruno Richard Hauptmann was sentenced to death for the kidnapping
Knowledge: Yes, Bruno Richard Hauptmann was sentenced to death for the kidnapping
Dialogue History: [Human]: Was the Lindbergh kidnapping ever solved?
### Response:
| The text is consistent with the given knowledge and dialogue history. |
Follow the instruction.
### Instruction:
Determine if the text is consistent or inconsistent with the provided knowledge and dialogue history. If there is a logical conflict, respond with 'inconsistent'. If there is no conflict, respond with 'consistent'.
### Input:
Text: Yes, the Lindbergh kidnapping was solved
Knowledge: Yes, Bruno Richard Hauptmann was sentenced to death for the kidnapping
Dialogue History: [Human]: Was the Lindbergh kidnapping ever solved?
### Response:
| The text is consistent with the given knowledge and dialogue history. |
Follow the instruction.
### Instruction:
Determine if the text is consistent or inconsistent with the provided knowledge and dialogue history. If there is a logical conflict, respond with 'inconsistent'. If there is no conflict, respond with 'consistent'.
### Input:
Text: Yes, a suspect was arrested and sentenced for the Lindbergh kidnapping
Knowledge: Yes, Bruno Richard Hauptmann was sentenced to death for the kidnapping
Dialogue History: [Human]: Was the Lindbergh kidnapping ever solved?
### Response:
| The text is consistent with the given knowledge and dialogue history. |
Follow the instruction.
### Instruction:
Determine if the text is consistent or inconsistent with the provided knowledge and dialogue history. If there is a logical conflict, respond with 'inconsistent'. If there is no conflict, respond with 'consistent'.
### Input:
Text: Yes, the case was solved, although there are still many alternative theories
Knowledge: Yes, Bruno Richard Hauptmann was sentenced to death for the kidnapping
Dialogue History: [Human]: Was the Lindbergh kidnapping ever solved?
### Response:
| The text is consistent with the given knowledge and dialogue history. |
Follow the instruction.
### Instruction:
Determine if the text is consistent or inconsistent with the provided knowledge and dialogue history. If there is a logical conflict, respond with 'inconsistent'. If there is no conflict, respond with 'consistent'.
### Input:
Text: Yes, Hauptmann was sentenced, although he denied his guilt
Knowledge: Yes, Bruno Richard Hauptmann was sentenced to death for the kidnapping
Dialogue History: [Human]: Was the Lindbergh kidnapping ever solved?
### Response:
| The text is consistent with the given knowledge and dialogue history. |
Follow the instruction.
### Instruction:
Determine if the text is consistent or inconsistent with the provided knowledge and dialogue history. If there is a logical conflict, respond with 'inconsistent'. If there is no conflict, respond with 'consistent'.
### Input:
Text: No, the Lindbergh kidnapping was never solved
Knowledge: Yes, Bruno Richard Hauptmann was sentenced to death for the kidnapping
Dialogue History: [Human]: Was the Lindbergh kidnapping ever solved?
### Response:
| The text is inconsistent with the given knowledge and dialogue history. |
Follow the instruction.
### Instruction:
Determine if the text is consistent or inconsistent with the provided knowledge and dialogue history. If there is a logical conflict, respond with 'inconsistent'. If there is no conflict, respond with 'consistent'.
### Input:
Text: No, the Lindbergh kidnapping is a famous cold case
Knowledge: Yes, Bruno Richard Hauptmann was sentenced to death for the kidnapping
Dialogue History: [Human]: Was the Lindbergh kidnapping ever solved?
### Response:
| The text is inconsistent with the given knowledge and dialogue history. |