Datasets:

jr303

/

offensive_comment_fr

like 0

You are really fu Materialscientist I think WP administrators clearly supporting Tamils and have a problems with Sinhalese First in ANI comment I didnt said Tamils or anyone is stupid I blamed tamils in ANI obni hillcountries for making Tamils who resorting to militancy as stupids by forcing me to add stupid reasons to wear arms sorry but honestly the reasons are stupid into the article If reasons are stupid first administrators should block 2 Tamils and other administrators who forced me to add content to the article astrnny

####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines) with keys : isoffensive (True if it's offensive). This this the message : You are really fu Materialscientist I think WP administrators clearly supporting Tamils and have a problems with Sinhalese First in ANI comment I didnt said Tamils or anyone is stupid I blamed tamils in ANI obni hillcountries for making Tamils who resorting to militancy as stupids by forcing me to add stupid reasons to wear arms sorry but honestly the reasons are stupid into the article If reasons are stupid first administrators should block 2 Tamils and other administrators who forced me to add content to the article astrnny

####Answer- {isoffensive : 1}

hoes pick me like dandelions PickMe

####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines) with keys : isoffensive (True if it's offensive). This this the message : hoes pick me like dandelions PickMe

####Answer- {isoffensive : 1}

I study traditional Chito Ryu at the yudansha level We see strong similarities between ourselves and other Okinawan styles such as Goju Ryu and Isshinryu One of those similarities is that the stances are indeed less deep and stylized Instead our stances are meant to allow fluid movement and dynamic turning movements Even those styles that employ deeper stances for kata will often employ shorter less deep stances as their fighting stance There is a good reason for that There are of course exceptions with each style having a number of longer and deeper stances for specialized application the question is what is the norm in that style B MacDonald

####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines) with keys : isoffensive (True if it's offensive). This this the message : I study traditional Chito Ryu at the yudansha level We see strong similarities between ourselves and other Okinawan styles such as Goju Ryu and Isshinryu One of those similarities is that the stances are indeed less deep and stylized Instead our stances are meant to allow fluid movement and dynamic turning movements Even those styles that employ deeper stances for kata will often employ shorter less deep stances as their fighting stance There is a good reason for that There are of course exceptions with each style having a number of longer and deeper stances for specialized application the question is what is the norm in that style B MacDonald

####Answer- {isoffensive : 0}

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules van

####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines) with keys : isoffensive (True if it's offensive). This this the message : hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules vandalism rules van

####Answer- {isoffensive : 1}

Hello Thanks for your feedback here The user in question is and as I pointed out in the discussion thread I dont think I personally should be the one to warn him about his edits since it will only provoke him to anger due to the fact that he has expressed his dislike for me in the past Thats why I think things would turn out better if you were to warn him since he hasnt argued with you before and as a result he would be more receptive to feedback from you than from me

####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines) with keys : isoffensive (True if it's offensive). This this the message : Hello Thanks for your feedback here The user in question is and as I pointed out in the discussion thread I dont think I personally should be the one to warn him about his edits since it will only provoke him to anger due to the fact that he has expressed his dislike for me in the past Thats why I think things would turn out better if you were to warn him since he hasnt argued with you before and as a result he would be more receptive to feedback from you than from me

####Answer- {isoffensive : 0}

This edit Was this intended to be a section edit I assume it was an unintentional booboo Not sure what happened so I just reverted

####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines) with keys : isoffensive (True if it's offensive). This this the message : This edit Was this intended to be a section edit I assume it was an unintentional booboo Not sure what happened so I just reverted

####Answer- {isoffensive : 0}

I thought it was the latter but Im not sure I get the impression the former is for pages that are not dedicated to a fringe theory but give it an WPUNDUE amount of attention I imagine it potentially being used on the Historical Jesus page

####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines) with keys : isoffensive (True if it's offensive). This this the message : I thought it was the latter but Im not sure I get the impression the former is for pages that are not dedicated to a fringe theory but give it an WPUNDUE amount of attention I imagine it potentially being used on the Historical Jesus page

####Answer- {isoffensive : 0}

Its time for the map and its tome of footnotes to go 681999618

####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines) with keys : isoffensive (True if it's offensive). This this the message : Its time for the map and its tome of footnotes to go 681999618

####Answer- {isoffensive : 0}

Lolgood day then Tαlκ 1930 9 Aug 2004 UTC

####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines) with keys : isoffensive (True if it's offensive). This this the message : Lolgood day then Tαlκ 1930 9 Aug 2004 UTC

####Answer- {isoffensive : 0}

and this is the way u must be treated

####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines) with keys : isoffensive (True if it's offensive). This this the message : and this is the way u must be treated

####Answer- {isoffensive : 0}

Hey WTF mate Listen that page was for ashleigh spittelers birthday when you deleted it Whats wrong with it

####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines) with keys : isoffensive (True if it's offensive). This this the message : Hey WTF mate Listen that page was for ashleigh spittelers birthday when you deleted it Whats wrong with it

####Answer- {isoffensive : 0}

It could be in a another artical by itself I think it is great information I would hate to have it deleted Also some names need to be corrected

####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines) with keys : isoffensive (True if it's offensive). This this the message : It could be in a another artical by itself I think it is great information I would hate to have it deleted Also some names need to be corrected

####Answer- {isoffensive : 0}

You do realize that a vast body of literature and academic works refers to the places in Ukraine solely by their Russian names especially in historical contexts Hard as it may be for you to believe but an average Western reader would not necessarily know that Kharkiv and Kharkov refer to the same place Including Russian names in the lede helps clarify this point makes crossreferencing historical literature and Wikipedia articles possible and generally improves our readers experience Call it the heritage of Russian imperialism or whatever but the fact remains that including Russian names in these articles is better for readers than not including them This said I dont see why names in Russian proper should be featured so prominently surely having transliterated Russian names should be sufficient At least lets tuck Russian proper and Russian pronunciation into a footnote  yo February 6 2013 1945 UTC

####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines) with keys : isoffensive (True if it's offensive). This this the message : You do realize that a vast body of literature and academic works refers to the places in Ukraine solely by their Russian names especially in historical contexts Hard as it may be for you to believe but an average Western reader would not necessarily know that Kharkiv and Kharkov refer to the same place Including Russian names in the lede helps clarify this point makes crossreferencing historical literature and Wikipedia articles possible and generally improves our readers experience Call it the heritage of Russian imperialism or whatever but the fact remains that including Russian names in these articles is better for readers than not including them This said I dont see why names in Russian proper should be featured so prominently surely having transliterated Russian names should be sufficient At least lets tuck Russian proper and Russian pronunciation into a footnote  yo February 6 2013 1945 UTC

####Answer- {isoffensive : 0}

Not the brightest candle in the box are you Tommy Yeah

####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines) with keys : isoffensive (True if it's offensive). This this the message : Not the brightest candle in the box are you Tommy Yeah

####Answer- {isoffensive : 0}

22 July 2011 UTCI have requested the move based on Wikipedia policy and not google results which I have already indicated I lend no special weight to But now Ill give you an example of why you shouldnt lend weight to them either I will also tell you why the results you have arent at all reliable Using the search term female genital cutting does not tell us the context of the result google finds Ill give you an excellent example of this I googled female genital cutting from 2010 to 2010 link here I draw your attention to the 3rd result from the top that is the 3rd most relevant result that google could find across that entire year for that term the title of this article is Sexual function in women with female genital mutilation Given that the title of this article clearly favours the term FGM I opened the pdf that google links to in order to find how exactly the term female genital cutting was used in the article This is the text I found on page 2 of that article Worldwide it is estimated that 100 to 140 million girls and women have undergone some form of FGM and each year 2 million girls are thought to be at risk 1 The World Health Organization WHO classification is superior to terms used by the public or even some scholarly reviewed publications The latter terms include female genital cutting female circumcision female Sunna circumcision and Pharaonic circumcisionIf the 3rd result on the first page of google scholar search is already a result which is refuting the use of the term FGC then I submit to you that you cant rely on google scholar results or ratios of results as a method of determining whether FGC is replacing or augmenting the term FGM Also note that the 4th result also uses FGM in the title and that the 6th result is another which is refuting the use of the term If stats are what matter then Ill put that into numbers 33 of the top results for the term female genital cutting for the year 2010 are refuting the use of the term female genital cutting 2052

####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines) with keys : isoffensive (True if it's offensive). This this the message : 22 July 2011 UTCI have requested the move based on Wikipedia policy and not google results which I have already indicated I lend no special weight to But now Ill give you an example of why you shouldnt lend weight to them either I will also tell you why the results you have arent at all reliable Using the search term female genital cutting does not tell us the context of the result google finds Ill give you an excellent example of this I googled female genital cutting from 2010 to 2010 link here I draw your attention to the 3rd result from the top that is the 3rd most relevant result that google could find across that entire year for that term the title of this article is Sexual function in women with female genital mutilation Given that the title of this article clearly favours the term FGM I opened the pdf that google links to in order to find how exactly the term female genital cutting was used in the article This is the text I found on page 2 of that article Worldwide it is estimated that 100 to 140 million girls and women have undergone some form of FGM and each year 2 million girls are thought to be at risk 1 The World Health Organization WHO classification is superior to terms used by the public or even some scholarly reviewed publications The latter terms include female genital cutting female circumcision female Sunna circumcision and Pharaonic circumcisionIf the 3rd result on the first page of google scholar search is already a result which is refuting the use of the term FGC then I submit to you that you cant rely on google scholar results or ratios of results as a method of determining whether FGC is replacing or augmenting the term FGM Also note that the 4th result also uses FGM in the title and that the 6th result is another which is refuting the use of the term If stats are what matter then Ill put that into numbers 33 of the top results for the term female genital cutting for the year 2010 are refuting the use of the term female genital cutting 2052

####Answer- {isoffensive : 0}

Needs a redirect to this page from Julie A MacDonald cant create the page without an account

####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines) with keys : isoffensive (True if it's offensive). This this the message : Needs a redirect to this page from Julie A MacDonald cant create the page without an account

####Answer- {isoffensive : 0}

OM and Fill must be doing homework and kicked off the computers otherwise they would have ran to the admins sooner Maybe they can tell us tomorrow if they finished their homeworkHimmler by proxy I think that is what OM has

####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines) with keys : isoffensive (True if it's offensive). This this the message : OM and Fill must be doing homework and kicked off the computers otherwise they would have ran to the admins sooner Maybe they can tell us tomorrow if they finished their homeworkHimmler by proxy I think that is what OM has

####Answer- {isoffensive : 0}

2015 UTCWe have some academics predominantly conservative who that claims that cultural marxism is a valid concept We have some academics predominantly radical left who claims its a conspiracy Why not leave it there and present the theory and the critique against it There is in no way any consensus regarding this as there is in theories about the fake moon landing 1648 16 June

####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines) with keys : isoffensive (True if it's offensive). This this the message : 2015 UTCWe have some academics predominantly conservative who that claims that cultural marxism is a valid concept We have some academics predominantly radical left who claims its a conspiracy Why not leave it there and present the theory and the critique against it There is in no way any consensus regarding this as there is in theories about the fake moon landing 1648 16 June

####Answer- {isoffensive : 0}

Im like Rashad and I did her like when he found out the ghetto truth about NewNew

####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines) with keys : isoffensive (True if it's offensive). This this the message : Im like Rashad and I did her like when he found out the ghetto truth about NewNew

####Answer- {isoffensive : 1}

Youre welcome I do try my best tlk cntrb

####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines) with keys : isoffensive (True if it's offensive). This this the message : Youre welcome I do try my best tlk cntrb

####Answer- {isoffensive : 0}

O3Millz xDSmooth idk who gave that bitch my name

####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines) with keys : isoffensive (True if it's offensive). This this the message : O3Millz xDSmooth idk who gave that bitch my name

####Answer- {isoffensive : 1}

My last statement wasnt a threat It was an invitation

####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines) with keys : isoffensive (True if it's offensive). This this the message : My last statement wasnt a threat It was an invitation

####Answer- {isoffensive : 0}

France Jacques Chirac President of France 1 February 1996 Eduardo Frei RuizTagle Eduardo Frei RuizTagle 27 February 1997 Kim Daejung President of South Korea 10 June 1998 Emil Constantinescu President of Romania 15 July 1998

####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines) with keys : isoffensive (True if it's offensive). This this the message : France Jacques Chirac President of France 1 February 1996 Eduardo Frei RuizTagle Eduardo Frei RuizTagle 27 February 1997 Kim Daejung President of South Korea 10 June 1998 Emil Constantinescu President of Romania 15 July 1998

####Answer- {isoffensive : 0}