Text
stringlengths
1
133
INDIAN POLITY
stringlengths
1
95
are used for any person whether male or female. Thus, in view of section 8, IPC, 1860
null
read with section 2(y), Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr PC, 1973) the pronoun 'his'
null
in clause (d) of section 125(1), Cr PC, 1973 also indicates a female.7.
null
7. Vijaya (Dr.) v Kashirao Rajaram Sawai, 1987 Cr LJ 977 : AIR 1987 SC 1100 [LNIND 1987 SC
null
200] ; M Areefa Beevi v Dr. K M Sahib, 1983 Cr LJ 412 (Ker) : See also Girdhar Gopal v State, 1953
null
Cr LJ 964 (MB) (Section 354 IPC, 1860).
null
THE INDIAN PENAL CODE
null
CHAPTER II GENERAL EXPLANATIONS
null
THIS Chapter is for the most part an elaborate interpretation clause. It is a key to the
null
interpretation of the whole Code. The leading terms used are here defined and
null
explained and the meanings thus, announced are steadily adhered to throughout the
null
subsequent chapters.
null
[s 9] Number.
null
Unless the contrary appears from the context, words importing the singular number
null
include the plural number, and words importing the plural number include the singular
null
number.
null
THE INDIAN PENAL CODE
null
CHAPTER II GENERAL EXPLANATIONS
null
THIS Chapter is for the most part an elaborate interpretation clause. It is a key to the
null
interpretation of the whole Code. The leading terms used are here defined and
null
explained and the meanings thus, announced are steadily adhered to throughout the
null
subsequent chapters.
null
[s 10] "Man" "Woman".
null
The word "man" denotes a male human being of any age; the word "woman" denotes a
null
female human being of any age.
null
COMMENT—
null
A female child of seven and a half months was held to be a "woman" for the purpose of
null
section 354 IPC, 1860.8.
null
8. State of Punjab v Major Singh, AIR 1967 SC 63 [LNIND 1966 SC 130] : 1967 Cr LJ 1 .
null
THE INDIAN PENAL CODE
null
CHAPTER II GENERAL EXPLANATIONS
null
THIS Chapter is for the most part an elaborate interpretation clause. It is a key to the
null
interpretation of the whole Code. The leading terms used are here defined and
null
explained and the meanings thus, announced are steadily adhered to throughout the
null
subsequent chapters.
null
[s 11] "Person".
null
The word "person" includes any Company or Association or body of persons, whether
null
incorporated or not.
null
COMMENT—
null
The term 'person' has been defined in section 11, IPC, 1860, and the same is in pari
null
materia with section 3(42) of the General Clauses Act 1897. Obviously, the definition is
null
inclusive.9. A natural person, an incorporated person or even an unincorporated
null
association or body of persons like a partnership can be a person under section 11 of
null
IPC, 1860.10. The Supreme Court has held in Standard Chartered Bank v Directorate of
null
Enforcement,11. that, as regards corporate criminal liability, there is no doubt that a
null
corporation or company could be prosecuted for any offence punishable under law,
null
whether it is coming under the strict liability or under absolute liability. A juristic person
null
has been held to come within the meaning of the word "person" for the purposes of
null
section 415 (cheating).12.
null
The State and its instrumentalities are juristic persons,13. but by implication, the State
null
stands excluded from the purview of the word 'person' for the purpose of limiting its
null
right to avail the revisional power of the High Court under section 397(1) of Cr PC, 1973
null
for the reason that the State, being the prosecutor of the offender, is enjoined to
null
conduct prosecution on behalf of the society and to take such remedial steps as to
null
deems proper.14. Chief Educational Officer is an artificial person/ juristic person falling
null
under section 11 of IPC, 1860.15.
null
[s 11.1] Accused person.—
null
Though the word "person" is defined in the Indian Penal Code section 11 and the
null
General Clauses Act section 3(42) which are identical and are not exhaustive but an
null
inclusive one. The words "accused" or "accused person" or "accused of an offence" are
null
not defined either in the Indian Penal Code or in the Indian Evidence Act or in the
null
General Clauses Act 1897.16.
null
[s 11.2] Complainant.—
null
A complaint can be filed in the name of a juristic person because it is also a person in
null
the eye of law. It is clear that complainant must be a corporeal person who is capable
null
of making a physical presence in the court. Its corollary is that even if the complaint is
null
made in the name of incorporeal person (like a company or corporation) it is necessary
null
that a natural person represents such juristic person in the court and it is that natural
null
person who is looked upon, for all practical purposes, to be the complainant in the
null
case. In other words, when the complainant is a body corporate it is the de jure
null
complainant, and it must necessarily associate a human being as de facto complainant
null
to represent the former in court proceedings.17. A company is a person in law and not
null
in fact. A person in law is always required to be represented by a person in fact. A
null
company can file a complaint for Defamation (section 500 IPC, 1860) through its
null
authorised representative.18.
null
9. Chief Education Officer, Salem v K S Palanichamy, 2012 Cr LJ 2543 (Mad).
null
10. B Raman v M/S. Shasun Chemicals and Drugs Ltd, 2006 Cr LJ 4552 (Mad); Target Overseas
null
Exports Pvt Ltd v A M Iqbal, 2005 Cr LJ 1931 (Ker).
null
11. Standard Chartered Bank v Directorate of Enforcement, AIR 2005 SC 2622 [LNIND 2005 SC
null
476] .
null
12. Reji Michael v Vertex Securities Ltd, 1999 Cr LJ 3787 (Ker).
null
13. Common Cause, A Registered Society v UOI, (1999) 6 SCC 667 [LNIND 1999 SC 637] : AIR
null
1999 SC 2979 [LNIND 1999 SC 637] .
null
14. Krishnan v Krishnaveni, AIR 1997 SC 987 [LNIND 1997 SC 1883] : 1997 Cr LJ 1519 : (1997) 4
null
SCC 241 [LNIND 1997 SC 1883] .
null
15. Chief Education Officer, Salem v K S Palanichamy, 2012 Cr LJ 2543 (Mad).
null
16. Directorate of Enforcement v Deepak Mahajan, AIR 1994 SC 1775 [LNIND 1993 SC 656] :
null
(1994) 3 SCC 440 : 1994 Cr LJ 2269 .
null
17. Associated Cement Co Ltd v Keshvanand, AIR 1998 SC 596 [LNIND 1997 SC 1634] : (1998) 1
null
SCC 687 [LNIND 1997 SC 1634] : 1998 Cr LJ 856 .
null
18. CM Ibrahim v Tata Sons Ltd, 2009 Cr LJ 228 (Kar).
null
THE INDIAN PENAL CODE
null
CHAPTER II GENERAL EXPLANATIONS
null
THIS Chapter is for the most part an elaborate interpretation clause. It is a key to the
null
interpretation of the whole Code. The leading terms used are here defined and
null
explained and the meanings thus, announced are steadily adhered to throughout the
null
subsequent chapters.
null
[s 12] "Public.".
null
The word "public" includes any class of the public, or any community.
null
COMMENT—
null