Datasets:

jaredjoss
/

jaredjoss-jigsaw-long-2000_160M_toxic

Dataset card Viewer Files Files and versions Community

Split (2)

train · 500 rows

prompt stringlengths 3 940	output stringlengths 101 944
== Airstaff schedule == I absolutley do not agree, I think they sould be allowed as i put them on, i am not exactly telling anyone what time they are on just what shift they hold down and who they are. In my opinon wikipedia is wrong in this sense. I think they should be allowed because the jocks are the most important part of a radio station, without them most radio stations would not be where they are today. Take WRIF or WKQI in detroit there morning shows are the most popular in the market and it is kind of cool and go online and see who actually is on it. Another reason (which is kind of stupid to some people, but to radio people like me it	== Airstaff schedule == I absolutley do not agree, I think they sould be allowed as i put them on, i am not exactly telling anyone what time they are on just what shift they hold down and who they are. In my opinon wikipedia is wrong in this sense. I think they should be allowed because the jocks are the most important part of a radio station, without them most radio stations would not be where they are today. Take WRIF or WKQI in detroit there morning shows are the most popular in the market and it is kind of cool and go online and see who actually is on it. Another reason (which is kind of stupid to some people, but to radio people like me it is
::::That mini-edit war was so stupid - so	::::That mini-edit war was so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid - so stupid -
Barek, Thanks for joining the discussion. As I mentioned to Luigi, 'it's not nice to throw that [a person's time/efforts] away without a basic exchange of civility.' I asked Luigi to read before he/she hits the delete button, and then, to grant a New User a Deletion Discussion...neither of which are unreasonable requests in a global, grass-roots, 'free-information' forum; nor did they necessitate intervention from anyone other than the intended reader. What's more: this is not a new concern that I raise, or is it one that has not been raised by another more seasoned member of the WIKITeam prior to my commentary; to wit SionK's comments entitled	Barek, Thanks for joining the discussion. As I mentioned to Luigi, 'it's not nice to throw that [a person's time/efforts] away without a basic exchange of civility.' I asked Luigi to read before he/she hits the delete button, and then, to grant a New User a Deletion Discussion...neither of which are unreasonable requests in a global, grass-roots, 'free-information' forum; nor did they necessitate intervention from anyone other than the intended reader. What's more: this is not a new concern that I raise, or is it one that has not been raised by another more seasoned member of the WIKITeam prior to my commentary; to wit SionK's comments entitled '
" == Need for specific references == [Many of these authors claim inspiration from an infinite intelligence, which is referred to by different authors by various names. Wayne Dyer refers to this as ""The Source"" or ""Great Masters of the Universe"". Louise Hay describes it/them as ""some of the best teachers on the planet today."" The Hicks' refer to this same source as ""Abraham"", Esther describing it as ""infinite intelligence"" and Jerry saying that ""They are the purest form of love I have ever experienced"". Stuart Wilde says these higher beings of a superior intelligence are placed in a celestial dimension that	" == Need for specific references == [Many of these authors claim inspiration from an infinite intelligence, which is referred to by different authors by various names. Wayne Dyer refers to this as ""The Source"" or ""Great Masters of the Universe"". Louise Hay describes it/them as ""some of the best teachers on the planet today."" The Hicks' refer to this same source as ""Abraham"", Esther describing it as ""infinite intelligence"" and Jerry saying that ""They are the purest form of love I have ever experienced"". Stuart Wilde says these higher beings of a superior intelligence are placed in a celestial dimension that is
" == Ryūlóng / Powergate92 interventions == Hello Wanted to thank you for coming in and commenting. After User:Spitfire came in with at least another pair of eyes and had a fair point to make on definitions, I left this message, which is pretty much my rationale for handling things as I did (so I encourage you to read it as well). I'm open to any criticisms on it, but as rollback my options are quite limited and from similar experience the parties usually need just reminder of the 'big picture' and it dissipates. Out of safety I never say speak ""block"" in any way shape or form unless it's at least one step removed from	" == Ryūlóng / Powergate92 interventions == Hello Wanted to thank you for coming in and commenting. After User:Spitfire came in with at least another pair of eyes and had a fair point to make on definitions, I left this message, which is pretty much my rationale for handling things as I did (so I encourage you to read it as well). I'm open to any criticisms on it, but as rollback my options are quite limited and from similar experience the parties usually need just reminder of the 'big picture' and it dissipates. Out of safety I never say speak ""block"" in any way shape or form unless it's at least one step removed from the
IF YOU ARE REDING THIS YOU SMELL LIKE A DOGS	IF YOU ARE REDING THIS YOU SMELL LIKE A DOGS. I'm not sure if this is a good idea, but I'm not sure if it is. I'm not sure if this is a good idea, but I'm not sure if it is. I'm not sure if this is a good idea, but I'm not sure if it is. I'm not sure if this is a good idea, but I'm not sure if
" :::::::::::I'm looking forward to the enlightened candidate that	" :::::::::::I'm looking forward to the enlightened candidate that I am. A: You can use the following code to get the number of candidates: $num_candidates = $num_candidates + 1; $num_candidates = $num_candidates + 1; $num_candidates = $num_candidates + 1; $num_candidates = $num_candidates + 1;
" :: Indeed, I agree that it reflects badly upon me when I sink to your level. However, I have to defend my good name, you're apparently trying to slander/libel/whatever. I don't know what is the reason for that, perhaps some personal animosity or anything. I don't know and I don't care. I asked you to stay civil and remove the lies you spread. To no avail. :: You pointed to a citation in which I paraphrased the WP:VERIFY. However, you failed to provide citations for your accusation that I've been in the mood (lie), that I think I can state anything I like (lie), that everyone else must provide references to remove it (shameless lie). Nor	" :: Indeed, I agree that it reflects badly upon me when I sink to your level. However, I have to defend my good name, you're apparently trying to slander/libel/whatever. I don't know what is the reason for that, perhaps some personal animosity or anything. I don't know and I don't care. I asked you to stay civil and remove the lies you spread. To no avail. :: You pointed to a citation in which I paraphrased the WP:VERIFY. However, you failed to provide citations for your accusation that I've been in the mood (lie), that I think I can state anything I like (lie), that everyone else must provide references to remove it (shameless lie). Nor do
== ITN == We obviously got off on the wrong foot big time. By all means, I encourage you to nominate stories you feel are worthy of posting. If you can do so without making insulting comments about Americans, or how the story would be posted if it happened in the US, etc., we won't have any further problems. If you look at my actual contributions (I supplied a list in the ITN thread), you'll see 19/21 stories I wrote this year are not US-based items. Most of these would have never been posted if I didn't write the stories. I do read American news source (which believe it or not does report	== ITN == We obviously got off on the wrong foot big time. By all means, I encourage you to nominate stories you feel are worthy of posting. If you can do so without making insulting comments about Americans, or how the story would be posted if it happened in the US, etc., we won't have any further problems. If you look at my actual contributions (I supplied a list in the ITN thread), you'll see 19/21 stories I wrote this year are not US-based items. Most of these would have never been posted if I didn't write the stories. I do read American news source (which believe it or not does report on
:The only idiot is the person picking one, the idea	:The only idiot is the person picking one, the idea that he is the only one who can do anything. I'm not saying that the person is the only one who can do anything, but I'm saying that the person is the only one who can do anything. I'm not saying that the person is the only one who can do anything, but I'm saying that the person is the only one who can do anything. I'm not saying that the person
" ::::::Dammit, J.del, you know very well I can't	" ::::::Dammit, J.del, you know very well I can't do this. A: You can use the following code to get the number of the first element of the array: $array = array( '1' => 1, '2' => 2, '3' => 3, '4' => 4, '5' => 5, '6' => 6,
Do it. Fucking block me. I don't fucking care. In	Do it. Fucking block me. I don't fucking care. In fact, I'm fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking fucking
" :I suggest you read the notes at the top of this	" :I suggest you read the notes at the top of this post. I have a few questions about the book. 1. What is the title of the book? The title of the book is "The Secret of the Secret of the Secret of the Secret of the Secret of the Secret of the Secret of the Secret of the Secret of the Secret of the Secret of the Secret of the Secret of the Secret of the Secret of the Secret of the Secret of the Secret
You too shit head, but I'm going to	You too shit head, but I'm going to be a good guy." "I'm going to be a good guy." "I'm going to be a good guy." "I'm going to be a good guy." "I'm going to be a good guy." "I'm going to be a good guy." "I'm going to be a good guy." "I'm going to be a good guy." "I'm going to be a good guy." "I'm going to
== justin carpenter == justin is the	== justin carpenter == justin is the name of the game <justin> <justin> <justin> <justin> <justin> <justin> <justin> <justin> <justin> <justin> <justin> <justin> <justin> <justin> <justin> <justin> <justin>
" Logicus to Johnuniq & Geuttarda: You are quite wrong JOHNUNIQ, as is Guettarda. There must be a point at which theories switch from bring ‘rejected’ to being ‘accepted’ if these terms are sufficiently well defined, such as in terms of unanimity, or a great majority, or simple majority of the scientific community, for example. And you clearly think there was such a point that was earlier than mid 20th century. But Darlington’s testimony suggests 1950 would be too early rather than too late. And it is not inconsequential to rationality theories of scientific revolutions whether we can	" Logicus to Johnuniq & Geuttarda: You are quite wrong JOHNUNIQ, as is Guettarda. There must be a point at which theories switch from bring ‘rejected’ to being ‘accepted’ if these terms are sufficiently well defined, such as in terms of unanimity, or a great majority, or simple majority of the scientific community, for example. And you clearly think there was such a point that was earlier than mid 20th century. But Darlington’s testimony suggests 1950 would be too early rather than too late. And it is not inconsequential to rationality theories of scientific revolutions whether we can be
:::Wait Gay sex between 15 year olds - dosent	:::Wait Gay sex between 15 year olds - dosent <p> <p> <p> <p> <p> <p> <p> <p> <p> <p> <p> <p> <p> <p> <p> <p> <p> <p> <p> <p> <p> <p
== Inventors Note: == I have no further interest in VMSK whatsoever - commercial or otherwise. I only invented it. It should be noted that papers by reputable scientists continue to be published on the method. 76 are listed in the UNB Textbook, appearing as recent as 2009. I may be an unknowing character as alleged, but my hardware does work as claimed and the many reputable scientists who have published peer review papers confirm this. Bobier's methods can also be proven. ( Xg Tech., since they are in use.) The problem with the commercial acceptance of the UNB methods is in the filters. These filters are vector adding filters which have very low envelop group delay	== Inventors Note: == I have no further interest in VMSK whatsoever - commercial or otherwise. I only invented it. It should be noted that papers by reputable scientists continue to be published on the method. 76 are listed in the UNB Textbook, appearing as recent as 2009. I may be an unknowing character as alleged, but my hardware does work as claimed and the many reputable scientists who have published peer review papers confirm this. Bobier's methods can also be proven. ( Xg Tech., since they are in use.) The problem with the commercial acceptance of the UNB methods is in the filters. These filters are vector adding filters which have very low envelop group delay.
== Bad references == I removed two bad references and the text supposedly taken from them: Ben Wener from the Orange County Register called the song to be deftly balancing the no-nonsense statements for the dramatic set she performed in the concert. * Clive Young and Steve Harvey from the International Pro Sound News called the song to be risky. * First off, the grammar was terrible, and whatever words that were used by the notional authors were not in quotes. Second, the music reviewer Ben Wener of the OC Register did not write any article by that name, and did not	== Bad references == I removed two bad references and the text supposedly taken from them: Ben Wener from the Orange County Register called the song to be deftly balancing the no-nonsense statements for the dramatic set she performed in the concert. * Clive Young and Steve Harvey from the International Pro Sound News called the song to be risky. * First off, the grammar was terrible, and whatever words that were used by the notional authors were not in quotes. Second, the music reviewer Ben Wener of the OC Register did not write any article by that name, and did not write
american football player love to drink. they also love alcohol in	american football player love to drink. they also love alcohol in general. The club has a history of being a very successful football club. The club has a history of being a very successful football club. The club has a history of being a very successful football club. The club has a history of being a very successful football club. The club has a history of being a very successful football club. The club has a history of being a
==Hey wanker== Will you never stop erasing me? You	==Hey wanker== Will you never stop erasing me? You're not gonna stop me from killing you. I'm not gonna stop you from killing me. I'm not gonna stop you from killing me. I'm not gonna stop you from killing me. I'm not gonna stop you from killing me. I'm not gonna stop you from killing me. I'm not gonna stop you from killing me. I'm
Unblock me you lying bastards here on wiki, nato's	Unblock me you lying bastards here on wiki, nato's a good place to start. I'm not sure if I'm being a little too harsh, but I'm not sure I'm being a little too harsh. I'm not sure if I'm being a little too harsh. I'm not sure if I'm being a little too harsh. I'm not sure if I'm being a little too harsh. I'm not sure if
Hillary Clinton then decided to drop the middle name Rodham	Hillary Clinton then decided to drop the middle name Rodham and instead use the name of the former president. The new name was first used in the 1980s by the Democratic Party, and was later used by the Republican Party in the 1990s. The name was also used by the Democratic Party in the 2000s, when it was used by the Republican Party. References Category:United States presidential campaigns Category:United States presidential campaigns Category:United States
" == New Article Deletion == I noticed that you removed the new Morris Mohawk Gaming Group article that I created yesterday and redirected to the ""Bodog"" article. I would question this decision. Bodog is the trademark and, of course, deserves its place in the encyclopedia for its significant history in the online gaming space as well as other sectors. However, the MMGG is the operator of one of the largest online gaming sites in the world and is a significant player in the industry. I realize that the MMGG is mentioned in the Bodog article as a brand licensee, but the removed article presented considerable additional information that would not have been appropriate	" == New Article Deletion == I noticed that you removed the new Morris Mohawk Gaming Group article that I created yesterday and redirected to the ""Bodog"" article. I would question this decision. Bodog is the trademark and, of course, deserves its place in the encyclopedia for its significant history in the online gaming space as well as other sectors. However, the MMGG is the operator of one of the largest online gaming sites in the world and is a significant player in the industry. I realize that the MMGG is mentioned in the Bodog article as a brand licensee, but the removed article presented considerable additional information that would not have been appropriate for
:And exactly who the fuck cares what some pile of electrons	:And exactly who the fuck cares what some pile of electrons are? I'm not saying that the universe is a bad place, but I'm saying that it's a bad place. I'm not saying that the universe is a bad place, but I'm saying that it's a bad place. I'm not saying that the universe is a bad place, but I'm saying that it's a bad place. I'm not saying that the universe is a
== Peer Review == This Wikipedia stub on “Digital content” is much improved from its earlier version. This updated, enhanced version is better written, both stylistically and grammatically. The organization of the information is presented in logical order. There are three main topics – History, Types, and See also – with the discussion of Types divided into four sub-topics. This structure makes the article easy to read and understand. More importantly, the text reads neutral or as neutral as it can be. The stub’s lead section is informative with key points of Digital content highlighted definition, forms and types, and applications. The section on History is brief and concise, as well as balanced in	== Peer Review == This Wikipedia stub on “Digital content” is much improved from its earlier version. This updated, enhanced version is better written, both stylistically and grammatically. The organization of the information is presented in logical order. There are three main topics – History, Types, and See also – with the discussion of Types divided into four sub-topics. This structure makes the article easy to read and understand. More importantly, the text reads neutral or as neutral as it can be. The stub’s lead section is informative with key points of Digital content highlighted definition, forms and types, and applications. The section on History is brief and concise, as well as balanced in its
== Edit request from DickFuckButt, 23 August 2010 ==	== Edit request from DickFuckButt, 23 August 2010 == Edit request from DickFuckButt, 23 August 2010 == Edit request from DickFuckButt, 23 August 2010 == Edit request from DickFuckButt, 23 August 2010 == Edit request from DickFuckButt, 23 August 2010 == Edit request from DickFuckButt, 23 August 2010 == Edit request from DickFuckButt, 23 August 2010 == Edit request from DickFuckButt, 23 August 2010 == Edit request from
" :I'm sure the phrase ""medically unexplained symptoms"" goes back a lot farther than the '70s...it's an easy enough series of words to put together in a medical setting. But we can't build an article about a random phrase, so the question becomes: When was it used to indicate a specific category of illnesses? I have no idea if Slavney was the first to do so or not, but I think that we're confounding the phrase with an actual category. A common phrase is probably not notable by Wikipedia standards; a medical category might be if it's in wide use. So I think we need to identify when this phrase was first	" :I'm sure the phrase ""medically unexplained symptoms"" goes back a lot farther than the '70s...it's an easy enough series of words to put together in a medical setting. But we can't build an article about a random phrase, so the question becomes: When was it used to indicate a specific category of illnesses? I have no idea if Slavney was the first to do so or not, but I think that we're confounding the phrase with an actual category. A common phrase is probably not notable by Wikipedia standards; a medical category might be if it's in wide use. So I think we need to identify when this phrase was first used
This article is ridiculous. I was about to paste some quotes	This article is ridiculous. I was about to paste some quotes from the article, but I was not able to get it to work. I have a question about the following: What is the best way to get a list of all the articles that are in the same category? I have a list of all the articles that are in the same category. I have a list of all the articles that are in the same category. I have a list of
== WHAT THE F*&%, MAN! == Nigguh, don't you know that it	== WHAT THE F*&%, MAN! == Nigguh, don't you know that it's a good idea to use the same name for the same thing? <mattg> I'm not sure if it's a good idea to use the same name for the same thing. <mattg> I'm not sure if it's a good idea to use the same name for the same thing? <mattg> I'm not sure if it's a
:Ya you herd the dooag. N o	:Ya you herd the dooag. N o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
::::*Ha, well now you know! Don't break your hamster penis next	::::*Ha, well now you know! Don't break your hamster penis next time you you you you you you you, you, you, you, you, you, you, you, you, you, you, you, you, you, you, you, you, you, you, you, you, you, you, you, you, you, you, you, you, you, you, you, you, you, you, you, you, you,
No he is not. He's Mr.Satan in the uncut dub. I	No he is not. He's Mr.Satan in the uncut dub. I'm not sure he's a good actor. I'm not sure he's a good actor. I'm not sure he's a good actor. I'm not sure he's a good actor. I'm not sure he's a good actor. I'm not sure he's a good actor. I'm not sure he's a good actor. I'm not sure he's a good actor. I'm not
" == AlladinSE's opinions vs. facts == In italics: * ""Palestinian Jews constituted a majority in the areas designated to the Jewish state by the partition and desired self-determination."" - This is an undisputed fact, not Israeli partisans claim * Palestinian Arabs dispute this, and claim that heavy immigration in the years immediately preceding the Partition unfairly tipped the scales in many areas, and that the total territory assigned to the Jewish State exceeded proportionally the land alloted to the Arabs. - it was a UN Plan, the Arabs refused to even negotiate. The largest part of Jewish territory was Negev desert.	" == AlladinSE's opinions vs. facts == In italics: * ""Palestinian Jews constituted a majority in the areas designated to the Jewish state by the partition and desired self-determination."" - This is an undisputed fact, not Israeli partisans claim * Palestinian Arabs dispute this, and claim that heavy immigration in the years immediately preceding the Partition unfairly tipped the scales in many areas, and that the total territory assigned to the Jewish State exceeded proportionally the land alloted to the Arabs. - it was a UN Plan, the Arabs refused to even negotiate. The largest part of Jewish territory was Negev desert. The
" Since the matter appears to already have been settled, It's a little late for this: ::Stop changing animal names in Walking With Dinosaurs, Walking With Beasts, When Dinoasurs Roamed America and Sea Monsters! Since this is an ""Opening volley"", it would have been more effective to word it thusly: : Please stop changing the animal names on the following pages: Walking with Dinosaurs, Walking with Beasts, When Dinosaurs Roamed America and Sea Monsters. Or, for even more authoritative: :Please refrain from changing the animal names... ::It's very annoying! Can't you see references beside each animal!? You're making the articles less specified and less imformative! You... The	" Since the matter appears to already have been settled, It's a little late for this: ::Stop changing animal names in Walking With Dinosaurs, Walking With Beasts, When Dinoasurs Roamed America and Sea Monsters! Since this is an ""Opening volley"", it would have been more effective to word it thusly: : Please stop changing the animal names on the following pages: Walking with Dinosaurs, Walking with Beasts, When Dinosaurs Roamed America and Sea Monsters. Or, for even more authoritative: :Please refrain from changing the animal names... ::It's very annoying! Can't you see references beside each animal!? You're making the articles less specified and less imformative! You... The article
" :Hi Yug, I left a note on the talk page asking for the refs. About your English, I really felt bad when I left a note saying it was not very good. To be clear, it certainly is ""good enough"" for conversation - I'm sure that we'd understand each other perfectly well if we were to have a conversation. But for the article, you frequently arrange your sentences incorrectly and some of the words that you choose are ""strange"". Obviously you are very intelligent - it seems that you have learned to speak Chinese? - but I get the feeling that you have not had a chance to use English in conversation much, is that correct? :Also, it seems that you want the article to reflect the fact that some of the statements	" :Hi Yug, I left a note on the talk page asking for the refs. About your English, I really felt bad when I left a note saying it was not very good. To be clear, it certainly is ""good enough"" for conversation - I'm sure that we'd understand each other perfectly well if we were to have a conversation. But for the article, you frequently arrange your sentences incorrectly and some of the words that you choose are ""strange"". Obviously you are very intelligent - it seems that you have learned to speak Chinese? - but I get the feeling that you have not had a chance to use English in conversation much, is that correct? :Also, it seems that you want the article to reflect the fact that some of the statements you
== TWL Questia check-in == Hello! You are receiving this message because The Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to Questia. This is a brief update to remind you about that access: Make sure that you can still log in to your Questia account; if you are having trouble feel free to get in touch. When your account expires you can reapply for access at WP:Questia. *Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage,	== TWL Questia check-in == Hello! You are receiving this message because The Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to Questia. This is a brief update to remind you about that access: Make sure that you can still log in to your Questia account; if you are having trouble feel free to get in touch. When your account expires you can reapply for access at WP:Questia. *Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the
== Please put references into inline format instead of hard coding == I've done the first two references as examples of inline citation, and I hope I've inspired you to finish the project, since fewer deleterious mutations will occur in this article if you do the job instead of me. The hard-coded format which you have used for citations will lead to linkage disequilibrium in the list of citations within a few generations as mutations and recombination occur in this article. Since the rate of recombination in Wikipedia articles is high, this article will quickly mutate from a well-referenced article, which it is now, into a pseudo-article,	== Please put references into inline format instead of hard coding == I've done the first two references as examples of inline citation, and I hope I've inspired you to finish the project, since fewer deleterious mutations will occur in this article if you do the job instead of me. The hard-coded format which you have used for citations will lead to linkage disequilibrium in the list of citations within a few generations as mutations and recombination occur in this article. Since the rate of recombination in Wikipedia articles is high, this article will quickly mutate from a well-referenced article, which it is now, into a pseudo-article, which
anonymous is not hackers we lied about this	anonymous is not hackers we lied about this. The only thing that is missing from this is the fact that the name of the hacker is not the name of the hacker. The name of the hacker is not the name of the hacker. The name of the hacker is not the name of the hacker. The name of the hacker is not the name of the hacker. The name of the hacker is not the name of the hacker. The
::::::::John's raison d'être is to be a poncey asshole who	::::::::John's raison d'être is to be a poncey asshole who is a poncey asshole who is a poncey asshole who is a poncey asshole who is a poncey asshole who is a poncey asshole who is a poncey asshole who is a poncey asshole who is a poncey asshole who is a poncey asshole who is a poncey asshole who is a poncey asshole who is a poncey asshole