doi
stringlengths 9
10
| chunk-id
stringlengths 1
4
| chunk
stringlengths 1
1.57k
| id
stringlengths 9
10
| title
stringlengths 10
127
| summary
stringlengths 581
1.92k
| source
stringlengths 30
31
| authors
sequence | categories
sequence | comment
stringclasses 28
values | journal_ref
stringclasses 1
value | primary_category
stringclasses 6
values | published
stringlengths 8
8
| updated
stringlengths 8
8
| references
list |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1405.3531 | 44 | of data augmentation similar to the CNN-based
methods) we are able to improve the performance
of shallow IFV to 68.02% (Table 2, [i]).
4.8 Performance Evolution on VOC-2007
A comparative plot of the evolution in the performance of the methods evaluated in this paper,
along with a selection from our earlier review of
shallow methods [12] is presented in Fig. 1. Classification accuracy over PASCAL VOC was 54.48%
mAP for the BoVW model in 2008, 61.7% for the
10
BOW
32K
–FK-BL
327K
–
[I]FK
327K
–
[a]FK-IN
84K
f s
[i]DeCAF
4K
t t
[II]CNN-F
4K
f s
[m]CNN-M 2K
2K
f s
[y]CNN-S
4K (TN)
f s
[γ]
545658606264666870727476788082mAP 68.02
54.4861.6963.6673.4177.1580.132008 2010 2013 2014 ...
82.42
Method
Dim.
Aug.
Ref. | 1405.3531 | Return of the Devil in the Details: Delving Deep into Convolutional Nets | The latest generation of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) have achieved
impressive results in challenging benchmarks on image recognition and object
detection, significantly raising the interest of the community in these
methods. Nevertheless, it is still unclear how different CNN methods compare
with each other and with previous state-of-the-art shallow representations such
as the Bag-of-Visual-Words and the Improved Fisher Vector. This paper conducts
a rigorous evaluation of these new techniques, exploring different deep
architectures and comparing them on a common ground, identifying and disclosing
important implementation details. We identify several useful properties of
CNN-based representations, including the fact that the dimensionality of the
CNN output layer can be reduced significantly without having an adverse effect
on performance. We also identify aspects of deep and shallow methods that can
be successfully shared. In particular, we show that the data augmentation
techniques commonly applied to CNN-based methods can also be applied to shallow
methods, and result in an analogous performance boost. Source code and models
to reproduce the experiments in the paper is made publicly available. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1405.3531 | [
"Ken Chatfield",
"Karen Simonyan",
"Andrea Vedaldi",
"Andrew Zisserman"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | Published in proceedings of BMVC 2014 | null | cs.CV | 20140514 | 20141105 | [] |
1405.3531 | 45 | 54.4861.6963.6673.4177.1580.132008 2010 2013 2014 ...
82.42
Method
Dim.
Aug.
Ref.
Fig. 1. Evolution of Performance on PASCAL VOC-2007 over the recent years. Please refer to Table 2
for details and references.
IFV in 2010 [12], and 73.41% for DeCAF [7] and
similar [8], [9] CNN-based methods introduced in
late 2013. Our best performing CNN-based method
(CNN-S with fine-tuning) achieves 82.42%, comparable to the most recent state-of-the-art.
4.9 Timings and dimensionality
One of our best-performing CNN representations
CNN-M-2048 [x] is 42more compact than the
best performing IFV [i] (84K vs. 2K) and CNN-M
features are also 50faster to compute ( 120s
vs.2:4sper image with augmentation enabled,
over a single CPU core). Non-augmented CNN-M
features [o] take around 0:3sper image, compared
to0:4sfor CNN-S features and 0:13sfor CNNF features.
5 C ONCLUSION | 1405.3531 | Return of the Devil in the Details: Delving Deep into Convolutional Nets | The latest generation of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) have achieved
impressive results in challenging benchmarks on image recognition and object
detection, significantly raising the interest of the community in these
methods. Nevertheless, it is still unclear how different CNN methods compare
with each other and with previous state-of-the-art shallow representations such
as the Bag-of-Visual-Words and the Improved Fisher Vector. This paper conducts
a rigorous evaluation of these new techniques, exploring different deep
architectures and comparing them on a common ground, identifying and disclosing
important implementation details. We identify several useful properties of
CNN-based representations, including the fact that the dimensionality of the
CNN output layer can be reduced significantly without having an adverse effect
on performance. We also identify aspects of deep and shallow methods that can
be successfully shared. In particular, we show that the data augmentation
techniques commonly applied to CNN-based methods can also be applied to shallow
methods, and result in an analogous performance boost. Source code and models
to reproduce the experiments in the paper is made publicly available. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1405.3531 | [
"Ken Chatfield",
"Karen Simonyan",
"Andrea Vedaldi",
"Andrew Zisserman"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | Published in proceedings of BMVC 2014 | null | cs.CV | 20140514 | 20141105 | [] |
1405.3531 | 46 | to0:4sfor CNN-S features and 0:13sfor CNNF features.
5 C ONCLUSION
In this paper we presented a rigorous empirical evaluation of CNN-based methods for image
classification, along with a comparison with more
traditional shallow feature encoding methods. We
have demonstrated that the performance of shallow representations can be significantly improved
by adopting data augmentation, typically used indeep learning. In spite of this improvement, deep
architectures still outperform the shallow methods
by a large margin. We have shown that the performance of deep representations on the ILSVRC
dataset is a good indicator of their performance
on other datasets, and that fine-tuning can further
improve on already very strong results achieved
using the combination of deep representations and
a linear SVM. Source code and CNN models to
reproduce the experiments presented in the paper
are available on the project website [32] in the
hope that it would provide common ground for
future comparisons, and good baselines for image
representation research.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was supported by the EPSRC and ERC
grant VisRec no. 228180. We gratefully acknowledge the support of NVIDIA Corporation with the
donation of the GPUs used for this research.
REFERENCES | 1405.3531 | Return of the Devil in the Details: Delving Deep into Convolutional Nets | The latest generation of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) have achieved
impressive results in challenging benchmarks on image recognition and object
detection, significantly raising the interest of the community in these
methods. Nevertheless, it is still unclear how different CNN methods compare
with each other and with previous state-of-the-art shallow representations such
as the Bag-of-Visual-Words and the Improved Fisher Vector. This paper conducts
a rigorous evaluation of these new techniques, exploring different deep
architectures and comparing them on a common ground, identifying and disclosing
important implementation details. We identify several useful properties of
CNN-based representations, including the fact that the dimensionality of the
CNN output layer can be reduced significantly without having an adverse effect
on performance. We also identify aspects of deep and shallow methods that can
be successfully shared. In particular, we show that the data augmentation
techniques commonly applied to CNN-based methods can also be applied to shallow
methods, and result in an analogous performance boost. Source code and models
to reproduce the experiments in the paper is made publicly available. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1405.3531 | [
"Ken Chatfield",
"Karen Simonyan",
"Andrea Vedaldi",
"Andrew Zisserman"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | Published in proceedings of BMVC 2014 | null | cs.CV | 20140514 | 20141105 | [] |
1405.3531 | 47 | grant VisRec no. 228180. We gratefully acknowledge the support of NVIDIA Corporation with the
donation of the GPUs used for this research.
REFERENCES
[1] G. Csurka, C. Bray, C. Dance, and L. Fan, “Visual categorization with bags of keypoints,” in Workshop on Statistical
Learning in Computer Vision, ECCV , 2004, pp. 1–22.
11
[2] J. Sivic and A. Zisserman, “Video Google: A text retrieval
approach to object matching in videos,” in Proc. ICCV ,
vol. 2, 2003, pp. 1470–1477.
[3] F. Perronnin, J. S ´anchez, and T. Mensink, “Improving the
Fisher kernel for large-scale image classification,” in Proc.
ECCV , 2010.
[4] Y. LeCun, B. Boser, J. S. Denker, D. Henderson, R. E.
Howard, W. Hubbard, and L. D. Jackel, “Backpropagation applied to handwritten zip code recognition,” Neural
Computation , vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 541–551, 1989. | 1405.3531 | Return of the Devil in the Details: Delving Deep into Convolutional Nets | The latest generation of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) have achieved
impressive results in challenging benchmarks on image recognition and object
detection, significantly raising the interest of the community in these
methods. Nevertheless, it is still unclear how different CNN methods compare
with each other and with previous state-of-the-art shallow representations such
as the Bag-of-Visual-Words and the Improved Fisher Vector. This paper conducts
a rigorous evaluation of these new techniques, exploring different deep
architectures and comparing them on a common ground, identifying and disclosing
important implementation details. We identify several useful properties of
CNN-based representations, including the fact that the dimensionality of the
CNN output layer can be reduced significantly without having an adverse effect
on performance. We also identify aspects of deep and shallow methods that can
be successfully shared. In particular, we show that the data augmentation
techniques commonly applied to CNN-based methods can also be applied to shallow
methods, and result in an analogous performance boost. Source code and models
to reproduce the experiments in the paper is made publicly available. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1405.3531 | [
"Ken Chatfield",
"Karen Simonyan",
"Andrea Vedaldi",
"Andrew Zisserman"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | Published in proceedings of BMVC 2014 | null | cs.CV | 20140514 | 20141105 | [] |
1405.3531 | 48 | Computation , vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 541–551, 1989.
[5] J. Deng, W. Dong, R. Socher, L.-J. Li, K. Li, and L. Fei-Fei,
“Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database,” in
Proc. CVPR , 2009.
[6] M. Everingham, L. Van Gool, C. K. I. Williams, J. Winn,
and A. Zisserman, “The PASCAL Visual Object Classes
(VOC) challenge,” IJCV , vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 303–338, 2010.
[7] J. Donahue, Y. Jia, O. Vinyals, J. Hoffman, N. Zhang,
E. Tzeng, and T. Darrell, “Decaf: A deep convolutional
activation feature for generic visual recognition,” CoRR ,
vol. abs/1310.1531, 2013.
[8] M. Oquab, L. Bottou, I. Laptev, and J. Sivic, “Learning
and Transferring Mid-Level Image Representations using
Convolutional Neural Networks,” in Proc. CVPR , 2014. | 1405.3531 | Return of the Devil in the Details: Delving Deep into Convolutional Nets | The latest generation of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) have achieved
impressive results in challenging benchmarks on image recognition and object
detection, significantly raising the interest of the community in these
methods. Nevertheless, it is still unclear how different CNN methods compare
with each other and with previous state-of-the-art shallow representations such
as the Bag-of-Visual-Words and the Improved Fisher Vector. This paper conducts
a rigorous evaluation of these new techniques, exploring different deep
architectures and comparing them on a common ground, identifying and disclosing
important implementation details. We identify several useful properties of
CNN-based representations, including the fact that the dimensionality of the
CNN output layer can be reduced significantly without having an adverse effect
on performance. We also identify aspects of deep and shallow methods that can
be successfully shared. In particular, we show that the data augmentation
techniques commonly applied to CNN-based methods can also be applied to shallow
methods, and result in an analogous performance boost. Source code and models
to reproduce the experiments in the paper is made publicly available. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1405.3531 | [
"Ken Chatfield",
"Karen Simonyan",
"Andrea Vedaldi",
"Andrew Zisserman"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | Published in proceedings of BMVC 2014 | null | cs.CV | 20140514 | 20141105 | [] |
1405.3531 | 49 | and Transferring Mid-Level Image Representations using
Convolutional Neural Networks,” in Proc. CVPR , 2014.
[9] A. Razavian, H. Azizpour, J. Sullivan, and S. Carlsson,
“CNN Features off-the-shelf: an Astounding Baseline for
Recognition,” CoRR , vol. abs/1403.6382, 2014.
[10] P . Sermanet, D. Eigen, X. Zhang, M. Mathieu, R. Fergus,
and Y. LeCun, “OverFeat: Integrated Recognition, Localization and Detection using Convolutional Networks,” in
Proc. ICLR , 2014.
[11] R. B. Girshick, J. Donahue, T. Darrell, and J. Malik, “Rich
feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation,” in Proc. CVPR , 2014.
[12] K. Chatfield, V . Lempitsky, A. Vedaldi, and A. Zisserman,
“The devil is in the details: an evaluation of recent feature
encoding methods,” in Proc. BMVC. , 2011. | 1405.3531 | Return of the Devil in the Details: Delving Deep into Convolutional Nets | The latest generation of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) have achieved
impressive results in challenging benchmarks on image recognition and object
detection, significantly raising the interest of the community in these
methods. Nevertheless, it is still unclear how different CNN methods compare
with each other and with previous state-of-the-art shallow representations such
as the Bag-of-Visual-Words and the Improved Fisher Vector. This paper conducts
a rigorous evaluation of these new techniques, exploring different deep
architectures and comparing them on a common ground, identifying and disclosing
important implementation details. We identify several useful properties of
CNN-based representations, including the fact that the dimensionality of the
CNN output layer can be reduced significantly without having an adverse effect
on performance. We also identify aspects of deep and shallow methods that can
be successfully shared. In particular, we show that the data augmentation
techniques commonly applied to CNN-based methods can also be applied to shallow
methods, and result in an analogous performance boost. Source code and models
to reproduce the experiments in the paper is made publicly available. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1405.3531 | [
"Ken Chatfield",
"Karen Simonyan",
"Andrea Vedaldi",
"Andrew Zisserman"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | Published in proceedings of BMVC 2014 | null | cs.CV | 20140514 | 20141105 | [] |
1405.3531 | 50 | “The devil is in the details: an evaluation of recent feature
encoding methods,” in Proc. BMVC. , 2011.
[13] A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and G. E. Hinton, “ImageNet
classification with deep convolutional neural networks,”
inNIPS , 2012, pp. 1106–1114.
[14] M. Paulin, J. Revaud, Z. Harchaoui, F. Perronnin, and
C. Schmid, “Transformation Pursuit for Image Classification,” in Proc. CVPR , 2014.
[15] F. Perronnin, Z. Akata, Z. Harchaoui, and C. Schmid,
“Towards good practice in large-scale learning for image
classification,” in Proc. CVPR , 2012, pp. 3482–3489.
[16] M. Oquab, L. Bottou, I. Laptev, and J. Sivic, “Weakly
supervised object recognition with convolutional neural
networks,” INRIA, Tech. Rep. HAL-01015140, 2014. | 1405.3531 | Return of the Devil in the Details: Delving Deep into Convolutional Nets | The latest generation of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) have achieved
impressive results in challenging benchmarks on image recognition and object
detection, significantly raising the interest of the community in these
methods. Nevertheless, it is still unclear how different CNN methods compare
with each other and with previous state-of-the-art shallow representations such
as the Bag-of-Visual-Words and the Improved Fisher Vector. This paper conducts
a rigorous evaluation of these new techniques, exploring different deep
architectures and comparing them on a common ground, identifying and disclosing
important implementation details. We identify several useful properties of
CNN-based representations, including the fact that the dimensionality of the
CNN output layer can be reduced significantly without having an adverse effect
on performance. We also identify aspects of deep and shallow methods that can
be successfully shared. In particular, we show that the data augmentation
techniques commonly applied to CNN-based methods can also be applied to shallow
methods, and result in an analogous performance boost. Source code and models
to reproduce the experiments in the paper is made publicly available. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1405.3531 | [
"Ken Chatfield",
"Karen Simonyan",
"Andrea Vedaldi",
"Andrew Zisserman"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | Published in proceedings of BMVC 2014 | null | cs.CV | 20140514 | 20141105 | [] |
1405.3531 | 51 | supervised object recognition with convolutional neural
networks,” INRIA, Tech. Rep. HAL-01015140, 2014.
[17] Y. Wei, W. Xia, J. Huang, B. Ni, J. Dong, Y. Zhao, and
S. Yan, “CNN: Single-label to multi-label,” CoRR , vol.
abs/1406.5726, 2014.
[18] H. J ´egou, F. Perronnin, M. Douze, J. S ´anchez, P . P ´erez, and
C. Schmid, “Aggregating local images descriptors into
compact codes,” IEEE P AMI , 2012.
[19] M. D. Zeiler and R. Fergus, “Visualizing and understanding convolutional networks,” CoRR , vol. abs/1311.2901,
2013.
[20] Y. Jia, “Caffe: An open source convolutional architecture
for fast feature embedding,” http://caffe.berkeleyvision.
org/, 2013.
[21] L. Fei-Fei, R. Fergus, and P . Perona, “Learning generative | 1405.3531 | Return of the Devil in the Details: Delving Deep into Convolutional Nets | The latest generation of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) have achieved
impressive results in challenging benchmarks on image recognition and object
detection, significantly raising the interest of the community in these
methods. Nevertheless, it is still unclear how different CNN methods compare
with each other and with previous state-of-the-art shallow representations such
as the Bag-of-Visual-Words and the Improved Fisher Vector. This paper conducts
a rigorous evaluation of these new techniques, exploring different deep
architectures and comparing them on a common ground, identifying and disclosing
important implementation details. We identify several useful properties of
CNN-based representations, including the fact that the dimensionality of the
CNN output layer can be reduced significantly without having an adverse effect
on performance. We also identify aspects of deep and shallow methods that can
be successfully shared. In particular, we show that the data augmentation
techniques commonly applied to CNN-based methods can also be applied to shallow
methods, and result in an analogous performance boost. Source code and models
to reproduce the experiments in the paper is made publicly available. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1405.3531 | [
"Ken Chatfield",
"Karen Simonyan",
"Andrea Vedaldi",
"Andrew Zisserman"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | Published in proceedings of BMVC 2014 | null | cs.CV | 20140514 | 20141105 | [] |
1405.3531 | 52 | org/, 2013.
[21] L. Fei-Fei, R. Fergus, and P . Perona, “Learning generative
visual models from few training examples: An incremental bayesian approach tested on 101 object categories,”
inIEEE CVPR Workshop of Generative Model Based Vision ,
2004.[22] G. Griffin, A. Holub, and P . Perona, “Caltech-256 object
category dataset,” California Institute of Technology,
Tech. Rep. 7694, 2007. [Online]. Available: http://
authors.library.caltech.edu/7694
[23] J. S ´anchez, F. Perronnin, and T. Em ´ıdio de Campos,
“Modeling the spatial layout of images beyond spatial
pyramids,” Pattern Recognition Letters , vol. 33, no. 16, pp.
2216–2223, 2012.
[24] R. Arandjelovi ´c and A. Zisserman, “Three things everyone should know to improve object retrieval,” in Proc.
CVPR , 2012.
[25] A. Vedaldi and A. Zisserman, “Efficient additive kernels
via explicit feature maps,” IEEE P AMI , 2011. | 1405.3531 | Return of the Devil in the Details: Delving Deep into Convolutional Nets | The latest generation of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) have achieved
impressive results in challenging benchmarks on image recognition and object
detection, significantly raising the interest of the community in these
methods. Nevertheless, it is still unclear how different CNN methods compare
with each other and with previous state-of-the-art shallow representations such
as the Bag-of-Visual-Words and the Improved Fisher Vector. This paper conducts
a rigorous evaluation of these new techniques, exploring different deep
architectures and comparing them on a common ground, identifying and disclosing
important implementation details. We identify several useful properties of
CNN-based representations, including the fact that the dimensionality of the
CNN output layer can be reduced significantly without having an adverse effect
on performance. We also identify aspects of deep and shallow methods that can
be successfully shared. In particular, we show that the data augmentation
techniques commonly applied to CNN-based methods can also be applied to shallow
methods, and result in an analogous performance boost. Source code and models
to reproduce the experiments in the paper is made publicly available. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1405.3531 | [
"Ken Chatfield",
"Karen Simonyan",
"Andrea Vedaldi",
"Andrew Zisserman"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | Published in proceedings of BMVC 2014 | null | cs.CV | 20140514 | 20141105 | [] |
1405.3531 | 53 | [25] A. Vedaldi and A. Zisserman, “Efficient additive kernels
via explicit feature maps,” IEEE P AMI , 2011.
[26] S. Lazebnik, C. Schmid, and J. Ponce, “Beyond Bags
of Features: Spatial Pyramid Matching for Recognizing
Natural Scene Categories,” in Proc. CVPR , 2006.
[27] R. Arandjelovi ´c and A. Zisserman, “All about VLAD,” in
Proc. CVPR , 2013.
[28] H. J ´egou, M. Douze, and C. Schmid, “On the burstiness
of visual elements,” in Proc. CVPR , Jun 2009.
[29] K. He, A. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun, “Spatial pyramid
pooling in deep convolutional networks for visual recognition,” in Proc. ECCV , 2014.
[30] M.-M. Cheng, Z. Zhang, W.-Y. Lin, and P . H. S. Torr,
“BING: Binarized normed gradients for objectness estimation at 300fps,” in Proc. CVPR , 2014. | 1405.3531 | Return of the Devil in the Details: Delving Deep into Convolutional Nets | The latest generation of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) have achieved
impressive results in challenging benchmarks on image recognition and object
detection, significantly raising the interest of the community in these
methods. Nevertheless, it is still unclear how different CNN methods compare
with each other and with previous state-of-the-art shallow representations such
as the Bag-of-Visual-Words and the Improved Fisher Vector. This paper conducts
a rigorous evaluation of these new techniques, exploring different deep
architectures and comparing them on a common ground, identifying and disclosing
important implementation details. We identify several useful properties of
CNN-based representations, including the fact that the dimensionality of the
CNN output layer can be reduced significantly without having an adverse effect
on performance. We also identify aspects of deep and shallow methods that can
be successfully shared. In particular, we show that the data augmentation
techniques commonly applied to CNN-based methods can also be applied to shallow
methods, and result in an analogous performance boost. Source code and models
to reproduce the experiments in the paper is made publicly available. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1405.3531 | [
"Ken Chatfield",
"Karen Simonyan",
"Andrea Vedaldi",
"Andrew Zisserman"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | Published in proceedings of BMVC 2014 | null | cs.CV | 20140514 | 20141105 | [] |
1405.3531 | 54 | “BING: Binarized normed gradients for objectness estimation at 300fps,” in Proc. CVPR , 2014.
[31] S. Yan, J. Dong, Q. Chen, Z. Song, Y. Pan, W. Xia,
H. Zhongyang, Y. Hua, and S. Shen, “Generalized hierarchical matching for subcategory aware object classification,” in The P ASCAL Visual Object Classes Challenge
Workshop , 2012.
[32] K. Chatfield, K. Simonyan, A. Vedaldi, and A. Zisserman,
“Return of the devil in the details: delving deep into
convolutional nets webpage,” 2014. [Online]. Available:
http://www.robots.ox.ac.uk/vgg/research/deep eval | 1405.3531 | Return of the Devil in the Details: Delving Deep into Convolutional Nets | The latest generation of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) have achieved
impressive results in challenging benchmarks on image recognition and object
detection, significantly raising the interest of the community in these
methods. Nevertheless, it is still unclear how different CNN methods compare
with each other and with previous state-of-the-art shallow representations such
as the Bag-of-Visual-Words and the Improved Fisher Vector. This paper conducts
a rigorous evaluation of these new techniques, exploring different deep
architectures and comparing them on a common ground, identifying and disclosing
important implementation details. We identify several useful properties of
CNN-based representations, including the fact that the dimensionality of the
CNN output layer can be reduced significantly without having an adverse effect
on performance. We also identify aspects of deep and shallow methods that can
be successfully shared. In particular, we show that the data augmentation
techniques commonly applied to CNN-based methods can also be applied to shallow
methods, and result in an analogous performance boost. Source code and models
to reproduce the experiments in the paper is made publicly available. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1405.3531 | [
"Ken Chatfield",
"Karen Simonyan",
"Andrea Vedaldi",
"Andrew Zisserman"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | Published in proceedings of BMVC 2014 | null | cs.CV | 20140514 | 20141105 | [] |
1406.1078 | 0 | Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder–Decoder
for Statistical Machine Translation
Kyunghyun Cho
Bart van Merri ¨enboer Caglar Gulcehre
Universit ´e de Montr ´eal
firstname.lastname@umontreal.caDzmitry Bahdanau
Jacobs University, Germany
d.bahdanau@jacobs-university.de
Fethi Bougares Holger Schwenk
Universit ´e du Maine, France
firstname.lastname@lium.univ-lemans.frYoshua Bengio
Universit ´e de Montr ´eal, CIFAR Senior Fellow
find.me@on.the.web
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN Encoder–
Decoder that consists of two recurrent
neural networks (RNN). One RNN encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixedlength vector representation, and the other
decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly
trained to maximize the conditional probability of a target sequence given a source | 1406.1078 | Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation | In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN
Encoder-Decoder that consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN). One RNN
encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and
the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The
encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly trained to maximize the
conditional probability of a target sequence given a source sequence. The
performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to
improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the
RNN Encoder-Decoder as an additional feature in the existing log-linear model.
Qualitatively, we show that the proposed model learns a semantically and
syntactically meaningful representation of linguistic phrases. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1078 | [
"Kyunghyun Cho",
"Bart van Merrienboer",
"Caglar Gulcehre",
"Dzmitry Bahdanau",
"Fethi Bougares",
"Holger Schwenk",
"Yoshua Bengio"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.LG",
"cs.NE",
"stat.ML"
] | EMNLP 2014 | null | cs.CL | 20140603 | 20140903 | [] |
1406.1078 | 1 | decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly
trained to maximize the conditional probability of a target sequence given a source
sequence. The performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the RNN Encoder–Decoder as an
additional feature in the existing log-linear
model. Qualitatively, we show that the
proposed model learns a semantically and
syntactically meaningful representation of
linguistic phrases.
1 Introduction
Deep neural networks have shown great success in
various applications such as objection recognition
(see, e.g., (Krizhevsky et al., 2012)) and speech
recognition (see, e.g., (Dahl et al., 2012)). Furthermore, many recent works showed that neural networks can be successfully used in a number of tasks in natural language processing (NLP).
These include, but are not limited to, language
modeling (Bengio et al., 2003), paraphrase detection (Socher et al., 2011) and word embedding extraction (Mikolov et al., 2013). In the field of statistical machine translation (SMT), deep neural
networks have begun to show promising results.
(Schwenk, 2012) summarizes a successful usage
of feedforward neural networks in the framework | 1406.1078 | Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation | In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN
Encoder-Decoder that consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN). One RNN
encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and
the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The
encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly trained to maximize the
conditional probability of a target sequence given a source sequence. The
performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to
improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the
RNN Encoder-Decoder as an additional feature in the existing log-linear model.
Qualitatively, we show that the proposed model learns a semantically and
syntactically meaningful representation of linguistic phrases. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1078 | [
"Kyunghyun Cho",
"Bart van Merrienboer",
"Caglar Gulcehre",
"Dzmitry Bahdanau",
"Fethi Bougares",
"Holger Schwenk",
"Yoshua Bengio"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.LG",
"cs.NE",
"stat.ML"
] | EMNLP 2014 | null | cs.CL | 20140603 | 20140903 | [] |
1406.1078 | 2 | networks have begun to show promising results.
(Schwenk, 2012) summarizes a successful usage
of feedforward neural networks in the framework
of phrase-based SMT system.Along this line of research on using neural networks for SMT, this paper focuses on a novel neural network architecture that can be used as a part
of the conventional phrase-based SMT system.
The proposed neural network architecture, which
we will refer to as an RNN Encoder–Decoder , consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN) that
act as an encoder and a decoder pair. The encoder maps a variable-length source sequence to a
fixed-length vector, and the decoder maps the vector representation back to a variable-length target
sequence. The two networks are trained jointly to
maximize the conditional probability of the target
sequence given a source sequence. Additionally,
we propose to use a rather sophisticated hidden
unit in order to improve both the memory capacity
and the ease of training.
The proposed RNN Encoder–Decoder with a
novel hidden unit is empirically evaluated on the
task of translating from English to French. We
train the model to learn the translation probability of an English phrase to a corresponding French
phrase. The model is then used as a part of a standard phrase-based SMT system by scoring each | 1406.1078 | Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation | In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN
Encoder-Decoder that consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN). One RNN
encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and
the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The
encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly trained to maximize the
conditional probability of a target sequence given a source sequence. The
performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to
improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the
RNN Encoder-Decoder as an additional feature in the existing log-linear model.
Qualitatively, we show that the proposed model learns a semantically and
syntactically meaningful representation of linguistic phrases. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1078 | [
"Kyunghyun Cho",
"Bart van Merrienboer",
"Caglar Gulcehre",
"Dzmitry Bahdanau",
"Fethi Bougares",
"Holger Schwenk",
"Yoshua Bengio"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.LG",
"cs.NE",
"stat.ML"
] | EMNLP 2014 | null | cs.CL | 20140603 | 20140903 | [] |
1406.1078 | 3 | train the model to learn the translation probability of an English phrase to a corresponding French
phrase. The model is then used as a part of a standard phrase-based SMT system by scoring each
phrase pair in the phrase table. The empirical evaluation reveals that this approach of scoring phrase
pairs with an RNN Encoder–Decoder improves
the translation performance.
We qualitatively analyze the trained RNN
Encoder–Decoder by comparing its phrase scores
with those given by the existing translation model.
The qualitative analysis shows that the RNN
Encoder–Decoder is better at capturing the linguistic regularities in the phrase table, indirectly
explaining the quantitative improvements in the
overall translation performance. The further analysis of the model reveals that the RNN Encoder–
Decoder learns a continuous space representation
of a phrase that preserves both the semantic and
syntactic structure of the phrase.arXiv:1406.1078v3 [cs.CL] 3 Sep 2014
2 RNN Encoder–Decoder
2.1 Preliminary: Recurrent Neural Networks
A recurrent neural network (RNN) is a neural network that consists of a hidden state hand an
optional output ywhich operates on a variablelength sequence x= (x1;:::;x T). At each time
stept, the hidden state hhtiof the RNN is updated
by | 1406.1078 | Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation | In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN
Encoder-Decoder that consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN). One RNN
encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and
the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The
encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly trained to maximize the
conditional probability of a target sequence given a source sequence. The
performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to
improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the
RNN Encoder-Decoder as an additional feature in the existing log-linear model.
Qualitatively, we show that the proposed model learns a semantically and
syntactically meaningful representation of linguistic phrases. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1078 | [
"Kyunghyun Cho",
"Bart van Merrienboer",
"Caglar Gulcehre",
"Dzmitry Bahdanau",
"Fethi Bougares",
"Holger Schwenk",
"Yoshua Bengio"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.LG",
"cs.NE",
"stat.ML"
] | EMNLP 2014 | null | cs.CL | 20140603 | 20140903 | [] |
1406.1078 | 4 | stept, the hidden state hhtiof the RNN is updated
by
hhti=f
hht 1i;xt
; (1)
wherefis a non-linear activation function.fmay be as simple as an elementwise logistic sigmoid function and as complex as a long short-term memory (LSTM)
unit (Hochreiter and Schmidhuber, 1997).
An RNN can learn a probability distribution
over a sequence by being trained to predict the
next symbol in a sequence. In that case, the output
at each timestep tis the conditional distribution
p(xtjxt 1;:::;x 1). For example, a multinomial
distribution ( 1-of-Kcoding) can be output using a
softmax activation function
p(xt;j= 1jxt 1;:::;x 1) =exp
wjhhti
PK
j0=1exp
wj0hhti;
(2)
for all possible symbols j= 1;:::;K , where wj
are the rows of a weight matrix W. By combining
these probabilities, we can compute the probability of the sequence xusing
p(x) =TY | 1406.1078 | Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation | In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN
Encoder-Decoder that consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN). One RNN
encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and
the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The
encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly trained to maximize the
conditional probability of a target sequence given a source sequence. The
performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to
improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the
RNN Encoder-Decoder as an additional feature in the existing log-linear model.
Qualitatively, we show that the proposed model learns a semantically and
syntactically meaningful representation of linguistic phrases. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1078 | [
"Kyunghyun Cho",
"Bart van Merrienboer",
"Caglar Gulcehre",
"Dzmitry Bahdanau",
"Fethi Bougares",
"Holger Schwenk",
"Yoshua Bengio"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.LG",
"cs.NE",
"stat.ML"
] | EMNLP 2014 | null | cs.CL | 20140603 | 20140903 | [] |
1406.1078 | 5 | are the rows of a weight matrix W. By combining
these probabilities, we can compute the probability of the sequence xusing
p(x) =TY
t=1p(xtjxt 1;:::;x 1): (3)
From this learned distribution, it is straightforward to sample a new sequence by iteratively sampling a symbol at each time step.
2.2 RNN Encoder–Decoder
In this paper, we propose a novel neural network
architecture that learns to encode a variable-length
sequence into a fixed-length vector representation
and to decode a given fixed-length vector representation back into a variable-length sequence.
From a probabilistic perspective, this new model
is a general method to learn the conditional distribution over a variable-length sequence conditioned on yet another variable-length sequence,
e.g.p(y1;:::;y T0jx1;:::;x T), where one
x1x2 xTyT' y2 y1
cDecoder
EncoderFigure 1: An illustration of the proposed RNN
Encoder–Decoder.
should note that the input and output sequence
lengthsTandT0may differ.
The encoder is an RNN that reads each symbol
of an input sequence xsequentially. As it reads | 1406.1078 | Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation | In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN
Encoder-Decoder that consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN). One RNN
encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and
the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The
encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly trained to maximize the
conditional probability of a target sequence given a source sequence. The
performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to
improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the
RNN Encoder-Decoder as an additional feature in the existing log-linear model.
Qualitatively, we show that the proposed model learns a semantically and
syntactically meaningful representation of linguistic phrases. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1078 | [
"Kyunghyun Cho",
"Bart van Merrienboer",
"Caglar Gulcehre",
"Dzmitry Bahdanau",
"Fethi Bougares",
"Holger Schwenk",
"Yoshua Bengio"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.LG",
"cs.NE",
"stat.ML"
] | EMNLP 2014 | null | cs.CL | 20140603 | 20140903 | [] |
1406.1078 | 6 | lengthsTandT0may differ.
The encoder is an RNN that reads each symbol
of an input sequence xsequentially. As it reads
each symbol, the hidden state of the RNN changes
according to Eq. (1). After reading the end of
the sequence (marked by an end-of-sequence symbol), the hidden state of the RNN is a summary c
of the whole input sequence.
The decoder of the proposed model is another
RNN which is trained to generate the output sequence by predicting the next symbol ytgiven the
hidden state hhti. However, unlike the RNN described in Sec. 2.1, both ytandhhtiare also conditioned onyt 1and on the summary cof the input
sequence. Hence, the hidden state of the decoder
at timetis computed by,
hhti=f
hht 1i;yt 1;c
;
and similarly, the conditional distribution of the
next symbol is
P(ytjyt 1;yt 2;:::;y 1;c) =g
hhti;yt 1;c
:
for given activation functions fandg(the latter
must produce valid probabilities, e.g. with a softmax).
See Fig. 1 for a graphical depiction of the proposed model architecture. | 1406.1078 | Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation | In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN
Encoder-Decoder that consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN). One RNN
encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and
the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The
encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly trained to maximize the
conditional probability of a target sequence given a source sequence. The
performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to
improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the
RNN Encoder-Decoder as an additional feature in the existing log-linear model.
Qualitatively, we show that the proposed model learns a semantically and
syntactically meaningful representation of linguistic phrases. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1078 | [
"Kyunghyun Cho",
"Bart van Merrienboer",
"Caglar Gulcehre",
"Dzmitry Bahdanau",
"Fethi Bougares",
"Holger Schwenk",
"Yoshua Bengio"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.LG",
"cs.NE",
"stat.ML"
] | EMNLP 2014 | null | cs.CL | 20140603 | 20140903 | [] |
1406.1078 | 7 | for given activation functions fandg(the latter
must produce valid probabilities, e.g. with a softmax).
See Fig. 1 for a graphical depiction of the proposed model architecture.
The two components of the proposed RNN
Encoder–Decoder are jointly trained to maximize
the conditional log-likelihood
max
1
NNX
n=1logp(ynjxn); (4)
where is the set of the model parameters and
each (xn;yn)is an (input sequence, output sequence) pair from the training set. In our case,
as the output of the decoder, starting from the input, is differentiable, we can use a gradient-based
algorithm to estimate the model parameters.
Once the RNN Encoder–Decoder is trained, the
model can be used in two ways. One way is to use
the model to generate a target sequence given an
input sequence. On the other hand, the model can
be used to score a given pair of input and output
sequences, where the score is simply a probability
p(yjx)from Eqs. (3) and (4).
2.3 Hidden Unit that Adaptively Remembers
and Forgets
In addition to a novel model architecture, we also
propose a new type of hidden unit ( fin Eq. (1)) | 1406.1078 | Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation | In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN
Encoder-Decoder that consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN). One RNN
encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and
the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The
encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly trained to maximize the
conditional probability of a target sequence given a source sequence. The
performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to
improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the
RNN Encoder-Decoder as an additional feature in the existing log-linear model.
Qualitatively, we show that the proposed model learns a semantically and
syntactically meaningful representation of linguistic phrases. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1078 | [
"Kyunghyun Cho",
"Bart van Merrienboer",
"Caglar Gulcehre",
"Dzmitry Bahdanau",
"Fethi Bougares",
"Holger Schwenk",
"Yoshua Bengio"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.LG",
"cs.NE",
"stat.ML"
] | EMNLP 2014 | null | cs.CL | 20140603 | 20140903 | [] |
1406.1078 | 8 | and Forgets
In addition to a novel model architecture, we also
propose a new type of hidden unit ( fin Eq. (1))
that has been motivated by the LSTM unit but is
much simpler to compute and implement.1Fig. 2
shows the graphical depiction of the proposed hidden unit.
Let us describe how the activation of the j-th
hidden unit is computed. First, the reset gaterjis
computed by
rj=
[Wrx]j+
Urhht 1i
j
; (5)
whereis the logistic sigmoid function, and [:]j
denotes the j-th element of a vector. xandht 1
are the input and the previous hidden state, respectively. WrandUrare weight matrices which are
learned.
Similarly, the update gatezjis computed by
zj=
[Wzx]j+
Uzhht 1i
j
: (6)
The actual activation of the proposed unit hjis
then computed by
hhti
j=zjhht 1i
j + (1 zj)~hhti
j; (7)
where
~hhti
j=
[Wx]j+
U | 1406.1078 | Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation | In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN
Encoder-Decoder that consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN). One RNN
encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and
the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The
encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly trained to maximize the
conditional probability of a target sequence given a source sequence. The
performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to
improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the
RNN Encoder-Decoder as an additional feature in the existing log-linear model.
Qualitatively, we show that the proposed model learns a semantically and
syntactically meaningful representation of linguistic phrases. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1078 | [
"Kyunghyun Cho",
"Bart van Merrienboer",
"Caglar Gulcehre",
"Dzmitry Bahdanau",
"Fethi Bougares",
"Holger Schwenk",
"Yoshua Bengio"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.LG",
"cs.NE",
"stat.ML"
] | EMNLP 2014 | null | cs.CL | 20140603 | 20140903 | [] |
1406.1078 | 9 | j; (7)
where
~hhti
j=
[Wx]j+
U
rhht 1i
j
:(8)
In this formulation, when the reset gate is close
to 0, the hidden state is forced to ignore the previous hidden state and reset with the current input
1The LSTM unit, which has shown impressive results in
several applications such as speech recognition, has a memory cell and four gating units that adaptively control the information flow inside the unit, compared to only two gating
units in the proposed hidden unit. For details on LSTM networks, see, e.g., (Graves, 2012).
z
rh h~xFigure 2: An illustration of the proposed hidden
activation function. The update gate zselects
whether the hidden state is to be updated with
a new hidden state ~h. The reset gate rdecides
whether the previous hidden state is ignored. See
Eqs. (5)–(8) for the detailed equations of r,z,h
and~h.
only. This effectively allows the hidden state to
drop any information that is found to be irrelevant
later in the future, thus, allowing a more compact
representation.
On the other hand, the update gate controls how
much information from the previous hidden state | 1406.1078 | Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation | In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN
Encoder-Decoder that consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN). One RNN
encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and
the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The
encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly trained to maximize the
conditional probability of a target sequence given a source sequence. The
performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to
improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the
RNN Encoder-Decoder as an additional feature in the existing log-linear model.
Qualitatively, we show that the proposed model learns a semantically and
syntactically meaningful representation of linguistic phrases. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1078 | [
"Kyunghyun Cho",
"Bart van Merrienboer",
"Caglar Gulcehre",
"Dzmitry Bahdanau",
"Fethi Bougares",
"Holger Schwenk",
"Yoshua Bengio"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.LG",
"cs.NE",
"stat.ML"
] | EMNLP 2014 | null | cs.CL | 20140603 | 20140903 | [] |
1406.1078 | 10 | later in the future, thus, allowing a more compact
representation.
On the other hand, the update gate controls how
much information from the previous hidden state
will carry over to the current hidden state. This
acts similarly to the memory cell in the LSTM
network and helps the RNN to remember longterm information. Furthermore, this may be considered an adaptive variant of a leaky-integration
unit (Bengio et al., 2013).
As each hidden unit has separate reset and update gates, each hidden unit will learn to capture
dependencies over different time scales. Those
units that learn to capture short-term dependencies
will tend to have reset gates that are frequently active, but those that capture longer-term dependencies will have update gates that are mostly active.
In our preliminary experiments, we found that
it is crucial to use this new unit with gating units.
We were not able to get meaningful result with an
oft-used tanh unit without any gating.
3 Statistical Machine Translation
In a commonly used statistical machine translation
system (SMT), the goal of the system (decoder,
specifically) is to find a translation fgiven a source
sentence e, which maximizes
p(fje)/p(ejf)p(f);
where the first term at the right hand side is called | 1406.1078 | Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation | In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN
Encoder-Decoder that consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN). One RNN
encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and
the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The
encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly trained to maximize the
conditional probability of a target sequence given a source sequence. The
performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to
improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the
RNN Encoder-Decoder as an additional feature in the existing log-linear model.
Qualitatively, we show that the proposed model learns a semantically and
syntactically meaningful representation of linguistic phrases. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1078 | [
"Kyunghyun Cho",
"Bart van Merrienboer",
"Caglar Gulcehre",
"Dzmitry Bahdanau",
"Fethi Bougares",
"Holger Schwenk",
"Yoshua Bengio"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.LG",
"cs.NE",
"stat.ML"
] | EMNLP 2014 | null | cs.CL | 20140603 | 20140903 | [] |
1406.1078 | 11 | sentence e, which maximizes
p(fje)/p(ejf)p(f);
where the first term at the right hand side is called
translation model and the latter language model
(see, e.g., (Koehn, 2005)). In practice, however,
most SMT systems model logp(fje)as a loglinear model with additional features and corresponding weights:
logp(fje) =NX
n=1wnfn(f;e) + logZ(e);(9)
wherefnandwnare then-th feature and weight,
respectively. Z(e)is a normalization constant that
does not depend on the weights. The weights are
often optimized to maximize the BLEU score on a
development set.
In the phrase-based SMT framework
introduced in (Koehn et al., 2003) and
(Marcu and Wong, 2002), the translation model
logp(ejf)is factorized into the translation
probabilities of matching phrases in the source
and target sentences.2These probabilities are
once again considered additional features in the
log-linear model (see Eq. (9)) and are weighted
accordingly to maximize the BLEU score.
Since the neural net language model was proposed in (Bengio et al., 2003), neural networks | 1406.1078 | Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation | In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN
Encoder-Decoder that consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN). One RNN
encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and
the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The
encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly trained to maximize the
conditional probability of a target sequence given a source sequence. The
performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to
improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the
RNN Encoder-Decoder as an additional feature in the existing log-linear model.
Qualitatively, we show that the proposed model learns a semantically and
syntactically meaningful representation of linguistic phrases. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1078 | [
"Kyunghyun Cho",
"Bart van Merrienboer",
"Caglar Gulcehre",
"Dzmitry Bahdanau",
"Fethi Bougares",
"Holger Schwenk",
"Yoshua Bengio"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.LG",
"cs.NE",
"stat.ML"
] | EMNLP 2014 | null | cs.CL | 20140603 | 20140903 | [] |
1406.1078 | 12 | accordingly to maximize the BLEU score.
Since the neural net language model was proposed in (Bengio et al., 2003), neural networks
have been used widely in SMT systems. In
many cases, neural networks have been used to
rescore translation hypotheses ( n-best lists) (see,
e.g., (Schwenk et al., 2006)). Recently, however,
there has been interest in training neural networks
to score the translated sentence (or phrase pairs)
using a representation of the source sentence as
an additional input. See, e.g., (Schwenk, 2012),
(Son et al., 2012) and (Zou et al., 2013).
3.1 Scoring Phrase Pairs with RNN
Encoder–Decoder
Here we propose to train the RNN Encoder–
Decoder (see Sec. 2.2) on a table of phrase pairs
and use its scores as additional features in the loglinear model in Eq. (9) when tuning the SMT decoder.
When we train the RNN Encoder–Decoder, we
ignore the (normalized) frequencies of each phrase
pair in the original corpora. This measure was
taken in order (1) to reduce the computational expense of randomly selecting phrase pairs from a | 1406.1078 | Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation | In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN
Encoder-Decoder that consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN). One RNN
encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and
the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The
encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly trained to maximize the
conditional probability of a target sequence given a source sequence. The
performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to
improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the
RNN Encoder-Decoder as an additional feature in the existing log-linear model.
Qualitatively, we show that the proposed model learns a semantically and
syntactically meaningful representation of linguistic phrases. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1078 | [
"Kyunghyun Cho",
"Bart van Merrienboer",
"Caglar Gulcehre",
"Dzmitry Bahdanau",
"Fethi Bougares",
"Holger Schwenk",
"Yoshua Bengio"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.LG",
"cs.NE",
"stat.ML"
] | EMNLP 2014 | null | cs.CL | 20140603 | 20140903 | [] |
1406.1078 | 13 | pair in the original corpora. This measure was
taken in order (1) to reduce the computational expense of randomly selecting phrase pairs from a
large phrase table according to the normalized frequencies and (2) to ensure that the RNN Encoder–
Decoder does not simply learn to rank the phrase
pairs according to their numbers of occurrences.
One underlying reason for this choice was that the
existing translation probability in the phrase table already reflects the frequencies of the phrase
2Without loss of generality, from here on, we refer to
p(ejf)for each phrase pair as a translation model as wellpairs in the original corpus. With a fixed capacity
of the RNN Encoder–Decoder, we try to ensure
that most of the capacity of the model is focused
toward learning linguistic regularities, i.e., distinguishing between plausible and implausible translations, or learning the “manifold” (region of probability concentration) of plausible translations.
Once the RNN Encoder–Decoder is trained, we
add a new score for each phrase pair to the existing phrase table. This allows the new scores to enter into the existing tuning algorithm with minimal
additional overhead in computation.
As Schwenk pointed out in (Schwenk, 2012),
it is possible to completely replace the existing | 1406.1078 | Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation | In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN
Encoder-Decoder that consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN). One RNN
encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and
the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The
encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly trained to maximize the
conditional probability of a target sequence given a source sequence. The
performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to
improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the
RNN Encoder-Decoder as an additional feature in the existing log-linear model.
Qualitatively, we show that the proposed model learns a semantically and
syntactically meaningful representation of linguistic phrases. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1078 | [
"Kyunghyun Cho",
"Bart van Merrienboer",
"Caglar Gulcehre",
"Dzmitry Bahdanau",
"Fethi Bougares",
"Holger Schwenk",
"Yoshua Bengio"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.LG",
"cs.NE",
"stat.ML"
] | EMNLP 2014 | null | cs.CL | 20140603 | 20140903 | [] |
1406.1078 | 14 | additional overhead in computation.
As Schwenk pointed out in (Schwenk, 2012),
it is possible to completely replace the existing
phrase table with the proposed RNN Encoder–
Decoder. In that case, for a given source phrase,
the RNN Encoder–Decoder will need to generate
a list of (good) target phrases. This requires, however, an expensive sampling procedure to be performed repeatedly. In this paper, thus, we only
consider rescoring the phrase pairs in the phrase
table.
3.2 Related Approaches: Neural Networks in
Machine Translation
Before presenting the empirical results, we discuss
a number of recent works that have proposed to
use neural networks in the context of SMT.
Schwenk in (Schwenk, 2012) proposed a similar approach of scoring phrase pairs. Instead of the
RNN-based neural network, he used a feedforward
neural network that has fixed-size inputs (7 words
in his case, with zero-padding for shorter phrases)
and fixed-size outputs (7 words in the target language). When it is used specifically for scoring
phrases for the SMT system, the maximum phrase
length is often chosen to be small. However, as the
length of phrases increases or as we apply neural | 1406.1078 | Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation | In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN
Encoder-Decoder that consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN). One RNN
encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and
the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The
encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly trained to maximize the
conditional probability of a target sequence given a source sequence. The
performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to
improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the
RNN Encoder-Decoder as an additional feature in the existing log-linear model.
Qualitatively, we show that the proposed model learns a semantically and
syntactically meaningful representation of linguistic phrases. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1078 | [
"Kyunghyun Cho",
"Bart van Merrienboer",
"Caglar Gulcehre",
"Dzmitry Bahdanau",
"Fethi Bougares",
"Holger Schwenk",
"Yoshua Bengio"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.LG",
"cs.NE",
"stat.ML"
] | EMNLP 2014 | null | cs.CL | 20140603 | 20140903 | [] |
1406.1078 | 15 | phrases for the SMT system, the maximum phrase
length is often chosen to be small. However, as the
length of phrases increases or as we apply neural
networks to other variable-length sequence data,
it is important that the neural network can handle variable-length input and output. The proposed RNN Encoder–Decoder is well-suited for
these applications.
Similar to (Schwenk, 2012), Devlin et al.
(Devlin et al., 2014) proposed to use a feedforward neural network to model a translation model,
however, by predicting one word in a target phrase
at a time. They reported an impressive improvement, but their approach still requires the maximum length of the input phrase (or context words)
to be fixed a priori.
Although it is not exactly a neural network they
train, the authors of (Zou et al., 2013) proposed
to learn a bilingual embedding of words/phrases.
They use the learned embedding to compute the
distance between a pair of phrases which is used
as an additional score of the phrase pair in an SMT
system.
In (Chandar et al., 2014), a feedforward neural
network was trained to learn a mapping from a
bag-of-words representation of an input phrase to
an output phrase. This is closely related to both the | 1406.1078 | Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation | In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN
Encoder-Decoder that consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN). One RNN
encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and
the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The
encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly trained to maximize the
conditional probability of a target sequence given a source sequence. The
performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to
improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the
RNN Encoder-Decoder as an additional feature in the existing log-linear model.
Qualitatively, we show that the proposed model learns a semantically and
syntactically meaningful representation of linguistic phrases. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1078 | [
"Kyunghyun Cho",
"Bart van Merrienboer",
"Caglar Gulcehre",
"Dzmitry Bahdanau",
"Fethi Bougares",
"Holger Schwenk",
"Yoshua Bengio"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.LG",
"cs.NE",
"stat.ML"
] | EMNLP 2014 | null | cs.CL | 20140603 | 20140903 | [] |
1406.1078 | 16 | network was trained to learn a mapping from a
bag-of-words representation of an input phrase to
an output phrase. This is closely related to both the
proposed RNN Encoder–Decoder and the model
proposed in (Schwenk, 2012), except that their input representation of a phrase is a bag-of-words.
A similar approach of using bag-of-words representations was proposed in (Gao et al., 2013) as
well. Earlier, a similar encoder–decoder model using two recursive neural networks was proposed
in (Socher et al., 2011), but their model was restricted to a monolingual setting, i.e. the model
reconstructs an input sentence. More recently, another encoder–decoder model using an RNN was
proposed in (Auli et al., 2013), where the decoder is conditioned on a representation of either
a source sentence or a source context.
One important difference between the proposed RNN Encoder–Decoder and the approaches
in (Zou et al., 2013) and (Chandar et al., 2014) is
that the order of the words in source and target phrases is taken into account. The RNN
Encoder–Decoder naturally distinguishes between
sequences that have the same words but in a different order, whereas the aforementioned approaches
effectively ignore order information.
The closest approach related to the proposed | 1406.1078 | Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation | In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN
Encoder-Decoder that consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN). One RNN
encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and
the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The
encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly trained to maximize the
conditional probability of a target sequence given a source sequence. The
performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to
improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the
RNN Encoder-Decoder as an additional feature in the existing log-linear model.
Qualitatively, we show that the proposed model learns a semantically and
syntactically meaningful representation of linguistic phrases. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1078 | [
"Kyunghyun Cho",
"Bart van Merrienboer",
"Caglar Gulcehre",
"Dzmitry Bahdanau",
"Fethi Bougares",
"Holger Schwenk",
"Yoshua Bengio"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.LG",
"cs.NE",
"stat.ML"
] | EMNLP 2014 | null | cs.CL | 20140603 | 20140903 | [] |
1406.1078 | 17 | sequences that have the same words but in a different order, whereas the aforementioned approaches
effectively ignore order information.
The closest approach related to the proposed
RNN Encoder–Decoder is the Recurrent Continuous Translation Model (Model 2) proposed in
(Kalchbrenner and Blunsom, 2013). In their paper, they proposed a similar model that consists
of an encoder and decoder. The difference with
our model is that they used a convolutional n-gram
model (CGM) for the encoder and the hybrid of
an inverse CGM and a recurrent neural network
for the decoder. They, however, evaluated their
model on rescoring the n-best list proposed by the
conventional SMT system and computing the perplexity of the gold standard translations.
4 Experiments
We evaluate our approach on the English/French
translation task of the WMT’14 workshop.4.1 Data and Baseline System
Large amounts of resources are available to build
an English/French SMT system in the framework
of the WMT’14 translation task. The bilingual
corpora include Europarl (61M words), news commentary (5.5M), UN (421M), and two crawled
corpora of 90M and 780M words respectively.
The last two corpora are quite noisy. To train | 1406.1078 | Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation | In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN
Encoder-Decoder that consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN). One RNN
encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and
the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The
encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly trained to maximize the
conditional probability of a target sequence given a source sequence. The
performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to
improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the
RNN Encoder-Decoder as an additional feature in the existing log-linear model.
Qualitatively, we show that the proposed model learns a semantically and
syntactically meaningful representation of linguistic phrases. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1078 | [
"Kyunghyun Cho",
"Bart van Merrienboer",
"Caglar Gulcehre",
"Dzmitry Bahdanau",
"Fethi Bougares",
"Holger Schwenk",
"Yoshua Bengio"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.LG",
"cs.NE",
"stat.ML"
] | EMNLP 2014 | null | cs.CL | 20140603 | 20140903 | [] |
1406.1078 | 18 | corpora of 90M and 780M words respectively.
The last two corpora are quite noisy. To train
the French language model, about 712M words of
crawled newspaper material is available in addition to the target side of the bitexts. All the word
counts refer to French words after tokenization.
It is commonly acknowledged that training statistical models on the concatenation of all this
data does not necessarily lead to optimal performance, and results in extremely large models which are difficult to handle. Instead, one
should focus on the most relevant subset of the
data for a given task. We have done so by
applying the data selection method proposed in
(Moore and Lewis, 2010), and its extension to bitexts (Axelrod et al., 2011). By these means we
selected a subset of 418M words out of more
than 2G words for language modeling and a
subset of 348M out of 850M words for training the RNN Encoder–Decoder. We used the
test set newstest2012 and 2013 for data
selection and weight tuning with MERT, and
newstest2014 as our test set. Each set has
more than 70 thousand words and a single reference translation.
For training the neural networks, including the
proposed RNN Encoder–Decoder, we limited the
source and target vocabulary to the most frequent | 1406.1078 | Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation | In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN
Encoder-Decoder that consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN). One RNN
encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and
the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The
encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly trained to maximize the
conditional probability of a target sequence given a source sequence. The
performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to
improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the
RNN Encoder-Decoder as an additional feature in the existing log-linear model.
Qualitatively, we show that the proposed model learns a semantically and
syntactically meaningful representation of linguistic phrases. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1078 | [
"Kyunghyun Cho",
"Bart van Merrienboer",
"Caglar Gulcehre",
"Dzmitry Bahdanau",
"Fethi Bougares",
"Holger Schwenk",
"Yoshua Bengio"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.LG",
"cs.NE",
"stat.ML"
] | EMNLP 2014 | null | cs.CL | 20140603 | 20140903 | [] |
1406.1078 | 19 | For training the neural networks, including the
proposed RNN Encoder–Decoder, we limited the
source and target vocabulary to the most frequent
15,000 words for both English and French. This
covers approximately 93% of the dataset. All the
out-of-vocabulary words were mapped to a special
token ( [UNK ]).
The baseline phrase-based SMT system was
built using Moses with default settings. This system achieves a BLEU score of 30.64 and 33.3 on
the development and test sets, respectively (see Table 1).
4.1.1 RNN Encoder–Decoder
The RNN Encoder–Decoder used in the experiment had 1000 hidden units with the proposed
gates at the encoder and at the decoder. The input matrix between each input symbol xhtiand the
hidden unit is approximated with two lower-rank
matrices, and the output matrix is approximated
ModelsBLEU
dev test
Baseline 30.64 33.30
RNN 31.20 33.87
CSLM + RNN 31.48 34.64
CSLM + RNN + WP 31.50 34.54
Table 1: BLEU scores computed on the development and test sets using different combinations of
approaches. WP denotes a word penalty , where
we penalizes the number of unknown words to | 1406.1078 | Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation | In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN
Encoder-Decoder that consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN). One RNN
encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and
the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The
encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly trained to maximize the
conditional probability of a target sequence given a source sequence. The
performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to
improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the
RNN Encoder-Decoder as an additional feature in the existing log-linear model.
Qualitatively, we show that the proposed model learns a semantically and
syntactically meaningful representation of linguistic phrases. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1078 | [
"Kyunghyun Cho",
"Bart van Merrienboer",
"Caglar Gulcehre",
"Dzmitry Bahdanau",
"Fethi Bougares",
"Holger Schwenk",
"Yoshua Bengio"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.LG",
"cs.NE",
"stat.ML"
] | EMNLP 2014 | null | cs.CL | 20140603 | 20140903 | [] |
1406.1078 | 20 | Table 1: BLEU scores computed on the development and test sets using different combinations of
approaches. WP denotes a word penalty , where
we penalizes the number of unknown words to
neural networks.
similarly. We used rank-100 matrices, equivalent
to learning an embedding of dimension 100 for
each word. The activation function used for ~hin
Eq. (8) is a hyperbolic tangent function. The computation from the hidden state in the decoder to
the output is implemented as a deep neural network (Pascanu et al., 2014) with a single intermediate layer having 500 maxout units each pooling
2 inputs (Goodfellow et al., 2013).
All the weight parameters in the RNN Encoder–
Decoder were initialized by sampling from an
isotropic zero-mean (white) Gaussian distribution
with its standard deviation fixed to 0:01, except
for the recurrent weight parameters. For the recurrent weight matrices, we first sampled from a
white Gaussian distribution and used its left singular vectors matrix, following (Saxe et al., 2014).
We used Adadelta and stochastic gradient
descent to train the RNN Encoder–Decoder
with hyperparameters = 10 6and=
0:95(Zeiler, 2012). At each update, we used 64 | 1406.1078 | Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation | In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN
Encoder-Decoder that consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN). One RNN
encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and
the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The
encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly trained to maximize the
conditional probability of a target sequence given a source sequence. The
performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to
improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the
RNN Encoder-Decoder as an additional feature in the existing log-linear model.
Qualitatively, we show that the proposed model learns a semantically and
syntactically meaningful representation of linguistic phrases. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1078 | [
"Kyunghyun Cho",
"Bart van Merrienboer",
"Caglar Gulcehre",
"Dzmitry Bahdanau",
"Fethi Bougares",
"Holger Schwenk",
"Yoshua Bengio"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.LG",
"cs.NE",
"stat.ML"
] | EMNLP 2014 | null | cs.CL | 20140603 | 20140903 | [] |
1406.1078 | 21 | with hyperparameters = 10 6and=
0:95(Zeiler, 2012). At each update, we used 64
randomly selected phrase pairs from a phrase table (which was created from 348M words). The
model was trained for approximately three days.
Details of the architecture used in the experiments are explained in more depth in the supplementary material.
4.1.2 Neural Language Model
In order to assess the effectiveness of scoring
phrase pairs with the proposed RNN Encoder–
Decoder, we also tried a more traditional approach
of using a neural network for learning a target
language model (CSLM) (Schwenk, 2007). Especially, the comparison between the SMT system
using CSLM and that using the proposed approach
of phrase scoring by RNN Encoder–Decoder will
clarify whether the contributions from multiple
neural networks in different parts of the SMT sys-tem add up or are redundant.
We trained the CSLM model on 7-grams
from the target corpus. Each input word
was projected into the embedding space R512,
and they were concatenated to form a 3072dimensional vector. The concatenated vector was
fed through two rectified layers (of size 1536 and
1024) (Glorot et al., 2011). The output layer was | 1406.1078 | Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation | In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN
Encoder-Decoder that consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN). One RNN
encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and
the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The
encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly trained to maximize the
conditional probability of a target sequence given a source sequence. The
performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to
improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the
RNN Encoder-Decoder as an additional feature in the existing log-linear model.
Qualitatively, we show that the proposed model learns a semantically and
syntactically meaningful representation of linguistic phrases. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1078 | [
"Kyunghyun Cho",
"Bart van Merrienboer",
"Caglar Gulcehre",
"Dzmitry Bahdanau",
"Fethi Bougares",
"Holger Schwenk",
"Yoshua Bengio"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.LG",
"cs.NE",
"stat.ML"
] | EMNLP 2014 | null | cs.CL | 20140603 | 20140903 | [] |
1406.1078 | 22 | fed through two rectified layers (of size 1536 and
1024) (Glorot et al., 2011). The output layer was
a simple softmax layer (see Eq. (2)). All the
weight parameters were initialized uniformly between 0:01and0:01, and the model was trained
until the validation perplexity did not improve for
10 epochs. After training, the language model
achieved a perplexity of 45.80. The validation set
was a random selection of 0.1% of the corpus. The
model was used to score partial translations during the decoding process, which generally leads to
higher gains in BLEU score than n-best list rescoring (Vaswani et al., 2013).
To address the computational complexity of
using a CSLM in the decoder a buffer was
used to aggregate n-grams during the stacksearch performed by the decoder. Only when
the buffer is full, or a stack is about to
be pruned, the n-grams are scored by the
CSLM. This allows us to perform fast matrixmatrix multiplication on GPU using Theano
(Bergstra et al., 2010; Bastien et al., 2012).
−60 −50 −40 −30 −20 −10 0−14−12−10−8−6−4−20 | 1406.1078 | Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation | In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN
Encoder-Decoder that consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN). One RNN
encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and
the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The
encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly trained to maximize the
conditional probability of a target sequence given a source sequence. The
performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to
improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the
RNN Encoder-Decoder as an additional feature in the existing log-linear model.
Qualitatively, we show that the proposed model learns a semantically and
syntactically meaningful representation of linguistic phrases. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1078 | [
"Kyunghyun Cho",
"Bart van Merrienboer",
"Caglar Gulcehre",
"Dzmitry Bahdanau",
"Fethi Bougares",
"Holger Schwenk",
"Yoshua Bengio"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.LG",
"cs.NE",
"stat.ML"
] | EMNLP 2014 | null | cs.CL | 20140603 | 20140903 | [] |
1406.1078 | 23 | −60 −50 −40 −30 −20 −10 0−14−12−10−8−6−4−20
RNN Scores (log)TM Scores (log)
Figure 3: The visualization of phrase pairs according to their scores (log-probabilities) by the RNN
Encoder–Decoder and the translation model.
4.2 Quantitative Analysis
We tried the following combinations:
1. Baseline configuration
2. Baseline + RNN
3. Baseline + CSLM + RNN
4. Baseline + CSLM + RNN + Word penalty
Source Translation Model RNN Encoder–Decoder
at the end of the [a la fin de la] [ ´r la fin des ann ´ees] [ ˆetre supprim ´es`a la fin de la][`a la fin du] [ `a la fin des] [ `a la fin de la]
for the first time [rc
pour la premi r¨ere fois] [ ´et´e donn ´es pour
la premi `ere fois] [ ´et´e comm ´emor ´ee pour la | 1406.1078 | Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation | In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN
Encoder-Decoder that consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN). One RNN
encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and
the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The
encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly trained to maximize the
conditional probability of a target sequence given a source sequence. The
performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to
improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the
RNN Encoder-Decoder as an additional feature in the existing log-linear model.
Qualitatively, we show that the proposed model learns a semantically and
syntactically meaningful representation of linguistic phrases. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1078 | [
"Kyunghyun Cho",
"Bart van Merrienboer",
"Caglar Gulcehre",
"Dzmitry Bahdanau",
"Fethi Bougares",
"Holger Schwenk",
"Yoshua Bengio"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.LG",
"cs.NE",
"stat.ML"
] | EMNLP 2014 | null | cs.CL | 20140603 | 20140903 | [] |
1406.1078 | 24 | la premi `ere fois] [ ´et´e comm ´emor ´ee pour la
premi `ere fois][pour la premi `ere fois] [pour la premi `ere fois ,]
[pour la premi `ere fois que]
in the United States
and[?aux?tats-Unis et] [ ´et´e ouvertes aux ´EtatsUnis et] [ ´et´e constat ´ees aux ´Etats-Unis et][aux Etats-Unis et] [des Etats-Unis et] [des
´Etats-Unis et]
, as well as [?s , qu’] [ ?s , ainsi que] [ ?re aussi bien que] [, ainsi qu’] [, ainsi que] [, ainsi que les]
one of the most [?t?l’ un des plus] [ ?l’ un des plus] [ ˆetre retenue
comme un de ses plus][l’ un des] [le] [un des]
(a) Long, frequent source phrases
Source Translation Model RNN Encoder–Decoder | 1406.1078 | Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation | In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN
Encoder-Decoder that consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN). One RNN
encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and
the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The
encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly trained to maximize the
conditional probability of a target sequence given a source sequence. The
performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to
improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the
RNN Encoder-Decoder as an additional feature in the existing log-linear model.
Qualitatively, we show that the proposed model learns a semantically and
syntactically meaningful representation of linguistic phrases. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1078 | [
"Kyunghyun Cho",
"Bart van Merrienboer",
"Caglar Gulcehre",
"Dzmitry Bahdanau",
"Fethi Bougares",
"Holger Schwenk",
"Yoshua Bengio"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.LG",
"cs.NE",
"stat.ML"
] | EMNLP 2014 | null | cs.CL | 20140603 | 20140903 | [] |
1406.1078 | 25 | (a) Long, frequent source phrases
Source Translation Model RNN Encoder–Decoder
, Minister of Communications and Transport[Secr ´etaire aux communications et aux transports :] [Secr ´etaire aux communications et aux
transports][Secr ´etaire aux communications et aux transports] [Secr ´etaire aux communications et aux
transports :]
did not comply with
the[vestimentaire , ne correspondaient pas `a des]
[susmentionn ´ee n’ ´etait pas conforme aux]
[pr´esent ´ees n’ ´etaient pas conformes `a la][n’ ont pas respect ´e les] [n’ ´etait pas conforme
aux] [n’ ont pas respect ´e la]
parts of the world . [c
gions du monde .] [r ´egions du monde consid´er´ees .] [r ´egion du monde consid ´er´ee .][parties du monde .] [les parties du monde .]
[des parties du monde .]
the past few days . [le petit texte .] [cours des tout derniers jours .] | 1406.1078 | Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation | In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN
Encoder-Decoder that consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN). One RNN
encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and
the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The
encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly trained to maximize the
conditional probability of a target sequence given a source sequence. The
performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to
improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the
RNN Encoder-Decoder as an additional feature in the existing log-linear model.
Qualitatively, we show that the proposed model learns a semantically and
syntactically meaningful representation of linguistic phrases. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1078 | [
"Kyunghyun Cho",
"Bart van Merrienboer",
"Caglar Gulcehre",
"Dzmitry Bahdanau",
"Fethi Bougares",
"Holger Schwenk",
"Yoshua Bengio"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.LG",
"cs.NE",
"stat.ML"
] | EMNLP 2014 | null | cs.CL | 20140603 | 20140903 | [] |
1406.1078 | 26 | [des parties du monde .]
the past few days . [le petit texte .] [cours des tout derniers jours .]
[les tout derniers jours .][ces derniers jours .] [les derniers jours .] [cours
des derniers jours .]
on Friday and Saturday[vendredi et samedi `a la] [vendredi et samedi `a]
[se d ´eroulera vendredi et samedi ,][le vendredi et le samedi] [le vendredi et samedi]
[vendredi et samedi]
(b) Long, rare source phrases
Table 2: The top scoring target phrases for a small set of source phrases according to the translation
model (direct translation probability) and by the RNN Encoder–Decoder. Source phrases were randomly
selected from phrases with 4 or more words. ?denotes an incomplete (partial) character. ris a Cyrillic
letter ghe.
The results are presented in Table 1. As expected, adding features computed by neural networks consistently improves the performance over
the baseline performance.
The best performance was achieved when we
used both CSLM and the phrase scores from the
RNN Encoder–Decoder. This suggests that the | 1406.1078 | Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation | In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN
Encoder-Decoder that consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN). One RNN
encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and
the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The
encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly trained to maximize the
conditional probability of a target sequence given a source sequence. The
performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to
improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the
RNN Encoder-Decoder as an additional feature in the existing log-linear model.
Qualitatively, we show that the proposed model learns a semantically and
syntactically meaningful representation of linguistic phrases. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1078 | [
"Kyunghyun Cho",
"Bart van Merrienboer",
"Caglar Gulcehre",
"Dzmitry Bahdanau",
"Fethi Bougares",
"Holger Schwenk",
"Yoshua Bengio"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.LG",
"cs.NE",
"stat.ML"
] | EMNLP 2014 | null | cs.CL | 20140603 | 20140903 | [] |
1406.1078 | 27 | the baseline performance.
The best performance was achieved when we
used both CSLM and the phrase scores from the
RNN Encoder–Decoder. This suggests that the
contributions of the CSLM and the RNN Encoder–
Decoder are not too correlated and that one can
expect better results by improving each method independently. Furthermore, we tried penalizing the
number of words that are unknown to the neural
networks (i.e. words which are not in the shortlist). We do so by simply adding the number of
unknown words as an additional feature the loglinear model in Eq. (9).3However, in this case we
3To understand the effect of the penalty, consider the set
of all words in the 15,000 large shortlist, SL. All words xi=2
SL are replaced by a special token [UNK]before being scored
by the neural networks. Hence, the conditional probability of
anyxi
t=2SL is actually given by the model as
p(xt= [UNK]jx<t) =p(xt=2SLjx<t)
=X
xj
t=2SLp
xj
tjx<t
p
xi
tjx<t
; | 1406.1078 | Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation | In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN
Encoder-Decoder that consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN). One RNN
encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and
the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The
encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly trained to maximize the
conditional probability of a target sequence given a source sequence. The
performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to
improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the
RNN Encoder-Decoder as an additional feature in the existing log-linear model.
Qualitatively, we show that the proposed model learns a semantically and
syntactically meaningful representation of linguistic phrases. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1078 | [
"Kyunghyun Cho",
"Bart van Merrienboer",
"Caglar Gulcehre",
"Dzmitry Bahdanau",
"Fethi Bougares",
"Holger Schwenk",
"Yoshua Bengio"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.LG",
"cs.NE",
"stat.ML"
] | EMNLP 2014 | null | cs.CL | 20140603 | 20140903 | [] |
1406.1078 | 28 | =X
xj
t=2SLp
xj
tjx<t
p
xi
tjx<t
;
where x<tis a shorthand notation for xt 1; : : : ; x 1.were not able to achieve better performance on the
test set, but only on the development set.
4.3 Qualitative Analysis
In order to understand where the performance improvement comes from, we analyze the phrase pair
scores computed by the RNN Encoder–Decoder
against the corresponding p(fje)from the translation model. Since the existing translation model
relies solely on the statistics of the phrase pairs in
the corpus, we expect its scores to be better estimated for the frequent phrases but badly estimated
for rare phrases. Also, as we mentioned earlier
in Sec. 3.1, we further expect the RNN Encoder–
Decoder which was trained without any frequency
information to score the phrase pairs based rather
on the linguistic regularities than on the statistics
of their occurrences in the corpus.
We focus on those pairs whose source phrase is
long (more than 3 words per source phrase) and
As a result, the probability of words not in the shortlist is
always overestimated. It is possible to address this issue by
backing off to an existing model that contain non-shortlisted | 1406.1078 | Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation | In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN
Encoder-Decoder that consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN). One RNN
encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and
the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The
encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly trained to maximize the
conditional probability of a target sequence given a source sequence. The
performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to
improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the
RNN Encoder-Decoder as an additional feature in the existing log-linear model.
Qualitatively, we show that the proposed model learns a semantically and
syntactically meaningful representation of linguistic phrases. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1078 | [
"Kyunghyun Cho",
"Bart van Merrienboer",
"Caglar Gulcehre",
"Dzmitry Bahdanau",
"Fethi Bougares",
"Holger Schwenk",
"Yoshua Bengio"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.LG",
"cs.NE",
"stat.ML"
] | EMNLP 2014 | null | cs.CL | 20140603 | 20140903 | [] |
1406.1078 | 29 | always overestimated. It is possible to address this issue by
backing off to an existing model that contain non-shortlisted
words (see (Schwenk, 2007)) In this paper, however, we opt
for introducing a word penalty instead, which counteracts the
word probability overestimation.
Source Samples from RNN Encoder–Decoder
at the end of the [`a la fin de la] (11)
for the first time [pour la premi `ere fois] (24) [pour la premi `ere fois que] (2)
in the United States and [aux ´Etats-Unis et] (6) [dans les ´Etats-Unis et] (4)
, as well as [, ainsi que] [,] [ainsi que] [, ainsi qu’] [et UNK]
one of the most [l’ un des plus] (9) [l’ un des] (5) [l’ une des plus] (2)
(a) Long, frequent source phrases
Source Samples from RNN Encoder–Decoder
, Minister of Communications and Transport[ , ministre des communications et le transport] ( 13) | 1406.1078 | Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation | In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN
Encoder-Decoder that consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN). One RNN
encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and
the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The
encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly trained to maximize the
conditional probability of a target sequence given a source sequence. The
performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to
improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the
RNN Encoder-Decoder as an additional feature in the existing log-linear model.
Qualitatively, we show that the proposed model learns a semantically and
syntactically meaningful representation of linguistic phrases. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1078 | [
"Kyunghyun Cho",
"Bart van Merrienboer",
"Caglar Gulcehre",
"Dzmitry Bahdanau",
"Fethi Bougares",
"Holger Schwenk",
"Yoshua Bengio"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.LG",
"cs.NE",
"stat.ML"
] | EMNLP 2014 | null | cs.CL | 20140603 | 20140903 | [] |
1406.1078 | 30 | Source Samples from RNN Encoder–Decoder
, Minister of Communications and Transport[ , ministre des communications et le transport] ( 13)
did not comply with the [n’ tait pas conforme aux] [n’ a pas respect l’] ( 2) [n’ a pas respect la] ( 3)
parts of the world . [arts du monde .] (11) [des arts du monde .] ( 7)
the past few days . [quelques jours .] (5) [les derniers jours .] ( 5) [ces derniers jours .] ( 2)
on Friday and Saturday [vendredi et samedi] ( 5) [le vendredi et samedi] ( 7) [le vendredi et le samedi] ( 4)
(b) Long, rare source phrases
Table 3: Samples generated from the RNN Encoder–Decoder for each source phrase used in Table 2. We
show the top-5 target phrases out of 50 samples. They are sorted by the RNN Encoder–Decoder scores.
Figure 4: 2–D embedding of the learned word representation. The left one shows the full embedding | 1406.1078 | Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation | In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN
Encoder-Decoder that consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN). One RNN
encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and
the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The
encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly trained to maximize the
conditional probability of a target sequence given a source sequence. The
performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to
improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the
RNN Encoder-Decoder as an additional feature in the existing log-linear model.
Qualitatively, we show that the proposed model learns a semantically and
syntactically meaningful representation of linguistic phrases. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1078 | [
"Kyunghyun Cho",
"Bart van Merrienboer",
"Caglar Gulcehre",
"Dzmitry Bahdanau",
"Fethi Bougares",
"Holger Schwenk",
"Yoshua Bengio"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.LG",
"cs.NE",
"stat.ML"
] | EMNLP 2014 | null | cs.CL | 20140603 | 20140903 | [] |
1406.1078 | 31 | Figure 4: 2–D embedding of the learned word representation. The left one shows the full embedding
space, while the right one shows a zoomed-in view of one region (color–coded). For more plots, see the
supplementary material.
frequent . For each such source phrase, we look
at the target phrases that have been scored high
either by the translation probability p(fje)or
by the RNN Encoder–Decoder. Similarly, we perform the same procedure with those pairs whose
source phrase is long butrare in the corpus.
Table 2 lists the top- 3target phrases per source
phrase favored either by the translation model
or by the RNN Encoder–Decoder. The source
phrases were randomly chosen among long ones
having more than 4 or 5 words.
In most cases, the choices of the target phrases
by the RNN Encoder–Decoder are closer to actual or literal translations. We can observe that the
RNN Encoder–Decoder prefers shorter phrases in
general.
Interestingly, many phrase pairs were scored
similarly by both the translation model and the
RNN Encoder–Decoder, but there were as manyother phrase pairs that were scored radically different (see Fig. 3). This could arise from the
proposed approach of training the RNN Encoder– | 1406.1078 | Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation | In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN
Encoder-Decoder that consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN). One RNN
encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and
the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The
encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly trained to maximize the
conditional probability of a target sequence given a source sequence. The
performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to
improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the
RNN Encoder-Decoder as an additional feature in the existing log-linear model.
Qualitatively, we show that the proposed model learns a semantically and
syntactically meaningful representation of linguistic phrases. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1078 | [
"Kyunghyun Cho",
"Bart van Merrienboer",
"Caglar Gulcehre",
"Dzmitry Bahdanau",
"Fethi Bougares",
"Holger Schwenk",
"Yoshua Bengio"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.LG",
"cs.NE",
"stat.ML"
] | EMNLP 2014 | null | cs.CL | 20140603 | 20140903 | [] |
1406.1078 | 32 | proposed approach of training the RNN Encoder–
Decoder on a set of unique phrase pairs, discouraging the RNN Encoder–Decoder from learning
simply the frequencies of the phrase pairs from the
corpus, as explained earlier.
Furthermore, in Table 3, we show for each of
the source phrases in Table 2, the generated samples from the RNN Encoder–Decoder. For each
source phrase, we generated 50 samples and show
the top-five phrases accordingly to their scores.
We can see that the RNN Encoder–Decoder is
able to propose well-formed target phrases without looking at the actual phrase table. Importantly,
the generated phrases do not overlap completely
with the target phrases from the phrase table. This
encourages us to further investigate the possibility
of replacing the whole or a part of the phrase table
Figure 5: 2–D embedding of the learned phrase representation. The top left one shows the full representation space (5000 randomly selected points), while the other three figures show the zoomed-in view of
specific regions (color–coded).
with the proposed RNN Encoder–Decoder in the
future.
4.4 Word and Phrase Representations
Since the proposed RNN Encoder–Decoder is not | 1406.1078 | Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation | In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN
Encoder-Decoder that consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN). One RNN
encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and
the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The
encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly trained to maximize the
conditional probability of a target sequence given a source sequence. The
performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to
improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the
RNN Encoder-Decoder as an additional feature in the existing log-linear model.
Qualitatively, we show that the proposed model learns a semantically and
syntactically meaningful representation of linguistic phrases. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1078 | [
"Kyunghyun Cho",
"Bart van Merrienboer",
"Caglar Gulcehre",
"Dzmitry Bahdanau",
"Fethi Bougares",
"Holger Schwenk",
"Yoshua Bengio"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.LG",
"cs.NE",
"stat.ML"
] | EMNLP 2014 | null | cs.CL | 20140603 | 20140903 | [] |
1406.1078 | 33 | with the proposed RNN Encoder–Decoder in the
future.
4.4 Word and Phrase Representations
Since the proposed RNN Encoder–Decoder is not
specifically designed only for the task of machine
translation, here we briefly look at the properties
of the trained model.
It has been known for some time that
continuous space language models using
neural networks are able to learn semantically meaningful embeddings (See, e.g.,
(Bengio et al., 2003; Mikolov et al., 2013)). Since
the proposed RNN Encoder–Decoder also projects
to and maps back from a sequence of words into
a continuous space vector, we expect to see a
similar property with the proposed model as well.
The left plot in Fig. 4 shows the 2–D embedding
of the words using the word embedding matrix
learned by the RNN Encoder–Decoder. The projection was done by the recently proposed BarnesHut-SNE (van der Maaten, 2013). We can clearly
see that semantically similar words are clusteredwith each other (see the zoomed-in plots in Fig. 4).
The proposed RNN Encoder–Decoder naturally
generates a continuous-space representation of a
phrase. The representation ( cin Fig. 1) in this | 1406.1078 | Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation | In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN
Encoder-Decoder that consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN). One RNN
encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and
the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The
encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly trained to maximize the
conditional probability of a target sequence given a source sequence. The
performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to
improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the
RNN Encoder-Decoder as an additional feature in the existing log-linear model.
Qualitatively, we show that the proposed model learns a semantically and
syntactically meaningful representation of linguistic phrases. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1078 | [
"Kyunghyun Cho",
"Bart van Merrienboer",
"Caglar Gulcehre",
"Dzmitry Bahdanau",
"Fethi Bougares",
"Holger Schwenk",
"Yoshua Bengio"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.LG",
"cs.NE",
"stat.ML"
] | EMNLP 2014 | null | cs.CL | 20140603 | 20140903 | [] |
1406.1078 | 34 | The proposed RNN Encoder–Decoder naturally
generates a continuous-space representation of a
phrase. The representation ( cin Fig. 1) in this
case is a 1000-dimensional vector. Similarly to the
word representations, we visualize the representations of the phrases that consists of four or more
words using the Barnes-Hut-SNE in Fig. 5.
From the visualization, it is clear that the RNN
Encoder–Decoder captures both semantic and syntactic structures of the phrases. For instance, in
the bottom-left plot, most of the phrases are about
the duration of time, while those phrases that are
syntactically similar are clustered together. The
bottom-right plot shows the cluster of phrases that
are semantically similar (countries or regions). On
the other hand, the top-right plot shows the phrases
that are syntactically similar.
5 Conclusion
In this paper, we proposed a new neural network
architecture, called an RNN Encoder–Decoder
that is able to learn the mapping from a sequence
of an arbitrary length to another sequence, possibly from a different set, of an arbitrary length. The
proposed RNN Encoder–Decoder is able to either
score a pair of sequences (in terms of a conditional
probability) or generate a target sequence given a
source sequence. Along with the new architecture, | 1406.1078 | Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation | In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN
Encoder-Decoder that consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN). One RNN
encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and
the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The
encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly trained to maximize the
conditional probability of a target sequence given a source sequence. The
performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to
improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the
RNN Encoder-Decoder as an additional feature in the existing log-linear model.
Qualitatively, we show that the proposed model learns a semantically and
syntactically meaningful representation of linguistic phrases. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1078 | [
"Kyunghyun Cho",
"Bart van Merrienboer",
"Caglar Gulcehre",
"Dzmitry Bahdanau",
"Fethi Bougares",
"Holger Schwenk",
"Yoshua Bengio"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.LG",
"cs.NE",
"stat.ML"
] | EMNLP 2014 | null | cs.CL | 20140603 | 20140903 | [] |
1406.1078 | 35 | score a pair of sequences (in terms of a conditional
probability) or generate a target sequence given a
source sequence. Along with the new architecture,
we proposed a novel hidden unit that includes a reset gate and an update gate that adaptively control
how much each hidden unit remembers or forgets
while reading/generating a sequence.
We evaluated the proposed model with the task
of statistical machine translation, where we used
the RNN Encoder–Decoder to score each phrase
pair in the phrase table. Qualitatively, we were
able to show that the new model is able to capture linguistic regularities in the phrase pairs well
and also that the RNN Encoder–Decoder is able to
propose well-formed target phrases.
The scores by the RNN Encoder–Decoder were
found to improve the overall translation performance in terms of BLEU scores. Also, we
found that the contribution by the RNN Encoder–
Decoder is rather orthogonal to the existing approach of using neural networks in the SMT system, so that we can improve further the performance by using, for instance, the RNN Encoder–
Decoder and the neural net language model together.
Our qualitative analysis of the trained model
shows that it indeed captures the linguistic regularities in multiple levels i.e. at the word level as
well as phrase level. This suggests that there may | 1406.1078 | Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation | In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN
Encoder-Decoder that consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN). One RNN
encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and
the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The
encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly trained to maximize the
conditional probability of a target sequence given a source sequence. The
performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to
improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the
RNN Encoder-Decoder as an additional feature in the existing log-linear model.
Qualitatively, we show that the proposed model learns a semantically and
syntactically meaningful representation of linguistic phrases. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1078 | [
"Kyunghyun Cho",
"Bart van Merrienboer",
"Caglar Gulcehre",
"Dzmitry Bahdanau",
"Fethi Bougares",
"Holger Schwenk",
"Yoshua Bengio"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.LG",
"cs.NE",
"stat.ML"
] | EMNLP 2014 | null | cs.CL | 20140603 | 20140903 | [] |
1406.1078 | 36 | Our qualitative analysis of the trained model
shows that it indeed captures the linguistic regularities in multiple levels i.e. at the word level as
well as phrase level. This suggests that there may
be more natural language related applications that
may benefit from the proposed RNN Encoder–
Decoder.
The proposed architecture has large potential
for further improvement and analysis. One approach that was not investigated here is to replace the whole, or a part of the phrase table by
letting the RNN Encoder–Decoder propose target
phrases. Also, noting that the proposed model is
not limited to being used with written language,
it will be an important future research to apply the
proposed architecture to other applications such as
speech transcription.
Acknowledgments
KC, BM, CG, DB and YB would like to thank
NSERC, Calcul Qu ´ebec, Compute Canada, the
Canada Research Chairs and CIFAR. FB and HS
were partially funded by the European Commis-sion under the project MateCat, and by DARPA
under the BOLT project.
References
[Auli et al.2013] Michael Auli, Michel Galley, Chris
Quirk, and Geoffrey Zweig. 2013. Joint language
and translation modeling with recurrent neural networks. In Proceedings of the ACL Conference on
Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing | 1406.1078 | Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation | In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN
Encoder-Decoder that consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN). One RNN
encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and
the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The
encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly trained to maximize the
conditional probability of a target sequence given a source sequence. The
performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to
improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the
RNN Encoder-Decoder as an additional feature in the existing log-linear model.
Qualitatively, we show that the proposed model learns a semantically and
syntactically meaningful representation of linguistic phrases. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1078 | [
"Kyunghyun Cho",
"Bart van Merrienboer",
"Caglar Gulcehre",
"Dzmitry Bahdanau",
"Fethi Bougares",
"Holger Schwenk",
"Yoshua Bengio"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.LG",
"cs.NE",
"stat.ML"
] | EMNLP 2014 | null | cs.CL | 20140603 | 20140903 | [] |
1406.1078 | 37 | Quirk, and Geoffrey Zweig. 2013. Joint language
and translation modeling with recurrent neural networks. In Proceedings of the ACL Conference on
Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
(EMNLP) , pages 1044–1054.
[Axelrod et al.2011] Amittai Axelrod, Xiaodong He,
and Jianfeng Gao. 2011. Domain adaptation via
pseudo in-domain data selection. In Proceedings of
the ACL Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) , pages 355–362.
[Bastien et al.2012] Fr ´ed´eric Bastien, Pascal Lamblin,
Razvan Pascanu, James Bergstra, Ian J. Goodfellow,
Arnaud Bergeron, Nicolas Bouchard, and Yoshua
Bengio. 2012. Theano: new features and speed improvements. Deep Learning and Unsupervised Feature Learning NIPS 2012 Workshop.
[Bengio et al.2003] Yoshua Bengio, R ´ejean Ducharme,
Pascal Vincent, and Christian Janvin. 2003. A neural probabilistic language model. J. Mach. Learn.
Res., 3:1137–1155, March. | 1406.1078 | Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation | In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN
Encoder-Decoder that consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN). One RNN
encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and
the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The
encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly trained to maximize the
conditional probability of a target sequence given a source sequence. The
performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to
improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the
RNN Encoder-Decoder as an additional feature in the existing log-linear model.
Qualitatively, we show that the proposed model learns a semantically and
syntactically meaningful representation of linguistic phrases. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1078 | [
"Kyunghyun Cho",
"Bart van Merrienboer",
"Caglar Gulcehre",
"Dzmitry Bahdanau",
"Fethi Bougares",
"Holger Schwenk",
"Yoshua Bengio"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.LG",
"cs.NE",
"stat.ML"
] | EMNLP 2014 | null | cs.CL | 20140603 | 20140903 | [] |
1406.1078 | 38 | Pascal Vincent, and Christian Janvin. 2003. A neural probabilistic language model. J. Mach. Learn.
Res., 3:1137–1155, March.
[Bengio et al.2013] Y . Bengio, N. BoulangerLewandowski, and R. Pascanu. 2013. Advances
in optimizing recurrent networks. In Proceedings
of the 38th International Conference on Acoustics,
Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP 2013) ,
May.
[Bergstra et al.2010] James Bergstra, Olivier Breuleux,
Fr´ed´eric Bastien, Pascal Lamblin, Razvan Pascanu,
Guillaume Desjardins, Joseph Turian, David WardeFarley, and Yoshua Bengio. 2010. Theano: a CPU
and GPU math expression compiler. In Proceedings
of the Python for Scientific Computing Conference
(SciPy) , June. Oral Presentation.
[Chandar et al.2014] Sarath Chandar, Stanislas Lauly,
Hugo Larochelle, Mitesh Khapra, Balaraman Ravindran, Vikas Raykar, and Amrita Saha. 2014. An autoencoder approach to learning bilingual word representations. arXiv: 1402.1454 [cs.CL] , February. | 1406.1078 | Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation | In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN
Encoder-Decoder that consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN). One RNN
encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and
the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The
encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly trained to maximize the
conditional probability of a target sequence given a source sequence. The
performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to
improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the
RNN Encoder-Decoder as an additional feature in the existing log-linear model.
Qualitatively, we show that the proposed model learns a semantically and
syntactically meaningful representation of linguistic phrases. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1078 | [
"Kyunghyun Cho",
"Bart van Merrienboer",
"Caglar Gulcehre",
"Dzmitry Bahdanau",
"Fethi Bougares",
"Holger Schwenk",
"Yoshua Bengio"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.LG",
"cs.NE",
"stat.ML"
] | EMNLP 2014 | null | cs.CL | 20140603 | 20140903 | [] |
1406.1078 | 39 | [Dahl et al.2012] George E. Dahl, Dong Yu, Li Deng,
and Alex Acero. 2012. Context-dependent pretrained deep neural networks for large vocabulary
speech recognition. IEEE Transactions on Audio,
Speech, and Language Processing , 20(1):33–42.
[Devlin et al.2014] Jacob Devlin, Rabih Zbib,
Zhongqiang Huang, Thomas Lamar, Richard
Schwartz, , and John Makhoul. 2014. Fast and
robust neural network joint models for statistical
machine translation. In Proceedings of the ACL
2014 Conference , ACL ’14, pages 1370–1380.
[Gao et al.2013] Jianfeng Gao, Xiaodong He, Wen tau
Yih, and Li Deng. 2013. Learning semantic representations for the phrase translation model. Technical report, Microsoft Research.
[Glorot et al.2011] X. Glorot, A. Bordes, and Y . Bengio. 2011. Deep sparse rectifier neural networks. In
AISTATS’2011 .
[Goodfellow et al.2013] Ian J. Goodfellow, David
Warde-Farley, Mehdi Mirza, Aaron Courville, and
Yoshua Bengio. 2013. Maxout networks. In
ICML’2013 . | 1406.1078 | Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation | In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN
Encoder-Decoder that consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN). One RNN
encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and
the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The
encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly trained to maximize the
conditional probability of a target sequence given a source sequence. The
performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to
improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the
RNN Encoder-Decoder as an additional feature in the existing log-linear model.
Qualitatively, we show that the proposed model learns a semantically and
syntactically meaningful representation of linguistic phrases. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1078 | [
"Kyunghyun Cho",
"Bart van Merrienboer",
"Caglar Gulcehre",
"Dzmitry Bahdanau",
"Fethi Bougares",
"Holger Schwenk",
"Yoshua Bengio"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.LG",
"cs.NE",
"stat.ML"
] | EMNLP 2014 | null | cs.CL | 20140603 | 20140903 | [] |
1406.1078 | 40 | Warde-Farley, Mehdi Mirza, Aaron Courville, and
Yoshua Bengio. 2013. Maxout networks. In
ICML’2013 .
[Graves2012] Alex Graves. 2012. Supervised Sequence Labelling with Recurrent Neural Networks .
Studies in Computational Intelligence. Springer.
[Hochreiter and Schmidhuber1997] S. Hochreiter and
J. Schmidhuber. 1997. Long short-term memory.
Neural Computation , 9(8):1735–1780.
[Kalchbrenner and Blunsom2013] Nal Kalchbrenner
and Phil Blunsom. 2013. Two recurrent continuous
translation models. In Proceedings of the ACL Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language
Processing (EMNLP) , pages 1700–1709.
[Koehn et al.2003] Philipp Koehn, Franz Josef Och,
and Daniel Marcu. 2003. Statistical phrase-based
translation. In Proceedings of the 2003 Conference
of the North American Chapter of the Association
for Computational Linguistics on Human Language
Technology - Volume 1 , NAACL ’03, pages 48–54.
[Koehn2005] P. Koehn. 2005. Europarl: A parallel corpus for statistical machine translation. In Machine | 1406.1078 | Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation | In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN
Encoder-Decoder that consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN). One RNN
encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and
the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The
encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly trained to maximize the
conditional probability of a target sequence given a source sequence. The
performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to
improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the
RNN Encoder-Decoder as an additional feature in the existing log-linear model.
Qualitatively, we show that the proposed model learns a semantically and
syntactically meaningful representation of linguistic phrases. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1078 | [
"Kyunghyun Cho",
"Bart van Merrienboer",
"Caglar Gulcehre",
"Dzmitry Bahdanau",
"Fethi Bougares",
"Holger Schwenk",
"Yoshua Bengio"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.LG",
"cs.NE",
"stat.ML"
] | EMNLP 2014 | null | cs.CL | 20140603 | 20140903 | [] |
1406.1078 | 41 | [Koehn2005] P. Koehn. 2005. Europarl: A parallel corpus for statistical machine translation. In Machine
Translation Summit X , pages 79–86, Phuket, Thailand.
[Krizhevsky et al.2012] Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya
Sutskever, and Geoffrey Hinton. 2012. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural
networks. In Advances in Neural Information
Processing Systems 25 (NIPS’2012) .
[Marcu and Wong2002] Daniel Marcu and William
Wong. 2002. A phrase-based, joint probability
model for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the ACL-02 Conference on Empirical
Methods in Natural Language Processing - Volume
10, EMNLP ’02, pages 133–139.
[Mikolov et al.2013] Tomas Mikolov, Ilya Sutskever,
Kai Chen, Greg Corrado, and Jeff Dean. 2013. Distributed representations of words and phrases and
their compositionality. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 26 , pages 3111–3119.
[Moore and Lewis2010] Robert C. Moore and William
Lewis. 2010. Intelligent selection of language
model training data. In Proceedings of the ACL
2010 Conference Short Papers , ACLShort ’10, | 1406.1078 | Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation | In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN
Encoder-Decoder that consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN). One RNN
encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and
the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The
encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly trained to maximize the
conditional probability of a target sequence given a source sequence. The
performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to
improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the
RNN Encoder-Decoder as an additional feature in the existing log-linear model.
Qualitatively, we show that the proposed model learns a semantically and
syntactically meaningful representation of linguistic phrases. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1078 | [
"Kyunghyun Cho",
"Bart van Merrienboer",
"Caglar Gulcehre",
"Dzmitry Bahdanau",
"Fethi Bougares",
"Holger Schwenk",
"Yoshua Bengio"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.LG",
"cs.NE",
"stat.ML"
] | EMNLP 2014 | null | cs.CL | 20140603 | 20140903 | [] |
1406.1078 | 42 | Lewis. 2010. Intelligent selection of language
model training data. In Proceedings of the ACL
2010 Conference Short Papers , ACLShort ’10,
pages 220–224, Stroudsburg, PA, USA.[Pascanu et al.2014] R. Pascanu, C. Gulcehre, K. Cho,
and Y . Bengio. 2014. How to construct deep recurrent neural networks. In Proceedings of the Second
International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2014) , April.
[Saxe et al.2014] Andrew M. Saxe, James L. McClelland, and Surya Ganguli. 2014. Exact solutions
to the nonlinear dynamics of learning in deep linear neural networks. In Proceedings of the Second
International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2014) , April.
[Schwenk et al.2006] Holger Schwenk, Marta R. CostaJuss`a, and Jos ´e A. R. Fonollosa. 2006. Continuous
space language models for the iwslt 2006 task. In
IWSLT , pages 166–173.
[Schwenk2007] Holger Schwenk. 2007. Continuous
space language models. Comput. Speech Lang. ,
21(3):492–518, July.
[Schwenk2012] Holger Schwenk. 2012. Continuous | 1406.1078 | Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation | In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN
Encoder-Decoder that consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN). One RNN
encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and
the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The
encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly trained to maximize the
conditional probability of a target sequence given a source sequence. The
performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to
improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the
RNN Encoder-Decoder as an additional feature in the existing log-linear model.
Qualitatively, we show that the proposed model learns a semantically and
syntactically meaningful representation of linguistic phrases. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1078 | [
"Kyunghyun Cho",
"Bart van Merrienboer",
"Caglar Gulcehre",
"Dzmitry Bahdanau",
"Fethi Bougares",
"Holger Schwenk",
"Yoshua Bengio"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.LG",
"cs.NE",
"stat.ML"
] | EMNLP 2014 | null | cs.CL | 20140603 | 20140903 | [] |
1406.1078 | 43 | space language models. Comput. Speech Lang. ,
21(3):492–518, July.
[Schwenk2012] Holger Schwenk. 2012. Continuous
space translation models for phrase-based statistical machine translation. In Martin Kay and Christian Boitet, editors, Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Computational Linguistics
(COLIN) , pages 1071–1080.
[Socher et al.2011] Richard Socher, Eric H. Huang, Jeffrey Pennington, Andrew Y . Ng, and Christopher D.
Manning. 2011. Dynamic pooling and unfolding
recursive autoencoders for paraphrase detection. In
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
24.
[Son et al.2012] Le Hai Son, Alexandre Allauzen, and
Franc ¸ois Yvon. 2012. Continuous space translation models with neural networks. In Proceedings of
the 2012 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics:
Human Language Technologies , NAACL HLT ’12,
pages 39–48, Stroudsburg, PA, USA.
[van der Maaten2013] Laurens van der Maaten. 2013.
Barnes-hut-sne. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Learning Representations
(ICLR 2013) , May. | 1406.1078 | Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation | In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN
Encoder-Decoder that consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN). One RNN
encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and
the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The
encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly trained to maximize the
conditional probability of a target sequence given a source sequence. The
performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to
improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the
RNN Encoder-Decoder as an additional feature in the existing log-linear model.
Qualitatively, we show that the proposed model learns a semantically and
syntactically meaningful representation of linguistic phrases. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1078 | [
"Kyunghyun Cho",
"Bart van Merrienboer",
"Caglar Gulcehre",
"Dzmitry Bahdanau",
"Fethi Bougares",
"Holger Schwenk",
"Yoshua Bengio"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.LG",
"cs.NE",
"stat.ML"
] | EMNLP 2014 | null | cs.CL | 20140603 | 20140903 | [] |
1406.1078 | 44 | Barnes-hut-sne. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Learning Representations
(ICLR 2013) , May.
[Vaswani et al.2013] Ashish Vaswani, Yinggong Zhao,
Victoria Fossum, and David Chiang. 2013. Decoding with large-scale neural language models improves translation. Proceedings of the Conference
on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , pages 1387–1392.
[Zeiler2012] Matthew D. Zeiler. 2012. ADADELTA:
an adaptive learning rate method. Technical report,
arXiv 1212.5701.
[Zou et al.2013] Will Y . Zou, Richard Socher,
Daniel M. Cer, and Christopher D. Manning.
2013. Bilingual word embeddings for phrase-based
machine translation. In Proceedings of the ACL
Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural
Language Processing (EMNLP) , pages 1393–1398.
A RNN Encoder–Decoder
In this document, we describe in detail the architecture of the RNN Encoder–Decoder used in the experiments.
Let us denote an source phrase by X= (x1;x2;:::;xN)and a target phrase by Y= | 1406.1078 | Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation | In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN
Encoder-Decoder that consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN). One RNN
encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and
the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The
encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly trained to maximize the
conditional probability of a target sequence given a source sequence. The
performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to
improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the
RNN Encoder-Decoder as an additional feature in the existing log-linear model.
Qualitatively, we show that the proposed model learns a semantically and
syntactically meaningful representation of linguistic phrases. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1078 | [
"Kyunghyun Cho",
"Bart van Merrienboer",
"Caglar Gulcehre",
"Dzmitry Bahdanau",
"Fethi Bougares",
"Holger Schwenk",
"Yoshua Bengio"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.LG",
"cs.NE",
"stat.ML"
] | EMNLP 2014 | null | cs.CL | 20140603 | 20140903 | [] |
1406.1078 | 45 | Let us denote an source phrase by X= (x1;x2;:::;xN)and a target phrase by Y=
(y1;y2;:::;yM). Each phrase is a sequence of K-dimensional one-hot vectors, such that only one
element of the vector is 1and all the others are 0. The index of the active ( 1) element indicates the word
represented by the vector.
A.1 Encoder
Each word of the source phrase is embedded in a 500-dimensional vector space: e(xi)2R500.e(x)is
used in Sec. 4.4 to visualize the words.
The hidden state of an encoder consists of 1000 hidden units, and each one of them at time tis
computed by
hhti
j=zjhht 1i
j + (1 zj)~hhti
j;
where
~hhti
j= tanh
[We(xt)]j+
U
rhht 1i
j
;
zj=
[Wze(xt)]j+
Uzhht 1i
j
;
rj=
[Wre(xt)]j+
Urhht 1i
j
: | 1406.1078 | Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation | In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN
Encoder-Decoder that consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN). One RNN
encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and
the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The
encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly trained to maximize the
conditional probability of a target sequence given a source sequence. The
performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to
improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the
RNN Encoder-Decoder as an additional feature in the existing log-linear model.
Qualitatively, we show that the proposed model learns a semantically and
syntactically meaningful representation of linguistic phrases. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1078 | [
"Kyunghyun Cho",
"Bart van Merrienboer",
"Caglar Gulcehre",
"Dzmitry Bahdanau",
"Fethi Bougares",
"Holger Schwenk",
"Yoshua Bengio"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.LG",
"cs.NE",
"stat.ML"
] | EMNLP 2014 | null | cs.CL | 20140603 | 20140903 | [] |
1406.1078 | 46 | j
;
rj=
[Wre(xt)]j+
Urhht 1i
j
:
andare a logistic sigmoid function and an element-wise multiplication, respectively. To make the
equations uncluttered, we omit biases. The initial hidden state hh0i
jis fixed to 0.
Once the hidden state at the Nstep (the end of the source phrase) is computed, the representation of
the source phrase cis
c= tanh
VhhNi
:
A.1.1 Decoder
The decoder starts by initializing the hidden state with
h0h0i= tanh
V0c
;
where we will use0to distinguish parameters of the decoder from those of the encoder.
The hidden state at time tof the decoder is computed by
h0hti
j=z0jh0ht 1i
j + (1 z0j)~h0hti
j;
where
~h0hti
j= tanh
W0e(yt 1)
j+r0j
U0h0
ht 1i+Cc
;
z0j= | 1406.1078 | Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation | In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN
Encoder-Decoder that consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN). One RNN
encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and
the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The
encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly trained to maximize the
conditional probability of a target sequence given a source sequence. The
performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to
improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the
RNN Encoder-Decoder as an additional feature in the existing log-linear model.
Qualitatively, we show that the proposed model learns a semantically and
syntactically meaningful representation of linguistic phrases. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1078 | [
"Kyunghyun Cho",
"Bart van Merrienboer",
"Caglar Gulcehre",
"Dzmitry Bahdanau",
"Fethi Bougares",
"Holger Schwenk",
"Yoshua Bengio"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.LG",
"cs.NE",
"stat.ML"
] | EMNLP 2014 | null | cs.CL | 20140603 | 20140903 | [] |
1406.1078 | 47 | j+r0j
U0h0
ht 1i+Cc
;
z0j=
W0ze(yt 1)
j+
U0zh0
ht 1i
j+ [Czc]j
;
r0j=
W0re(yt 1)
j+
U0rh0
ht 1i
j+ [Crc]j
;
ande(y0)is an all-zero vector. Similarly to the case of the encoder, e(y)is an embedding of a target
word.
Unlike the encoder which simply encodes the source phrase, the decoder is learned to generate a target
phrase. At each time t, the decoder computes the probability of generating j-th word by
p(yt;j= 1jyt 1;:::;y1;X) =exp
gjshti
PK
j0=1exp
gj0shti;
where thei-element of shtiis
shti
i= maxn
s0hti
2i 1;s0hti
2io
and
s0hti=Ohh0hti+Oyyt 1+Occ: | 1406.1078 | Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation | In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN
Encoder-Decoder that consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN). One RNN
encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and
the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The
encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly trained to maximize the
conditional probability of a target sequence given a source sequence. The
performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to
improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the
RNN Encoder-Decoder as an additional feature in the existing log-linear model.
Qualitatively, we show that the proposed model learns a semantically and
syntactically meaningful representation of linguistic phrases. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1078 | [
"Kyunghyun Cho",
"Bart van Merrienboer",
"Caglar Gulcehre",
"Dzmitry Bahdanau",
"Fethi Bougares",
"Holger Schwenk",
"Yoshua Bengio"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.LG",
"cs.NE",
"stat.ML"
] | EMNLP 2014 | null | cs.CL | 20140603 | 20140903 | [] |
1406.1078 | 48 | s0hti
2i 1;s0hti
2io
and
s0hti=Ohh0hti+Oyyt 1+Occ:
In short, the shti
iis a so-called maxout unit.
For the computational efficiency, instead of a single-matrix output weight G, we use a product of two
matrices such that
G=GlGr;
where Gl2RK500andGr2R5001000.
B Word and Phrase Representations
Here, we show enlarged plots of the word and phrase representations in Figs. 4–5.
Figure 6: 2–D embedding of the learned word representation. The top left one shows the full embedding space, while the other three figures show the zoomed-in
view of specific regions (color–coded).
Figure 7: 2–D embedding of the learned phrase representation. The top left one shows the full representation space (1000 randomly selected points), while the
other three figures show the zoomed-in view of specific regions (color–coded). | 1406.1078 | Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation | In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN
Encoder-Decoder that consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN). One RNN
encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and
the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The
encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly trained to maximize the
conditional probability of a target sequence given a source sequence. The
performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to
improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the
RNN Encoder-Decoder as an additional feature in the existing log-linear model.
Qualitatively, we show that the proposed model learns a semantically and
syntactically meaningful representation of linguistic phrases. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1078 | [
"Kyunghyun Cho",
"Bart van Merrienboer",
"Caglar Gulcehre",
"Dzmitry Bahdanau",
"Fethi Bougares",
"Holger Schwenk",
"Yoshua Bengio"
] | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.LG",
"cs.NE",
"stat.ML"
] | EMNLP 2014 | null | cs.CL | 20140603 | 20140903 | [] |
1406.4729 | 0 | 1
Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional
Networks for Visual Recognition
Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun
Abstract —Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size ( e.g., 224224) input image. This requirement is “artificial” and may reduce the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary size/scale. In this
work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy, “spatial pyramid pooling”, to eliminate the above requirement. The
new network structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid
pooling is also robust to object deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all CNN-based image
classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN
architectures despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101 datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-theart classification results using a single full-image representation and no fine-tuning. | 1406.4729 | Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition | Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size
(e.g., 224x224) input image. This requirement is "artificial" and may reduce
the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary
size/scale. In this work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy,
"spatial pyramid pooling", to eliminate the above requirement. The new network
structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation
regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid pooling is also robust to object
deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all
CNN-based image classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we
demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN architectures
despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101
datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-the-art classification results using a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net,
we compute the feature maps from the entire image only once, and then pool
features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length
representations for training the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly
computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102x faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable
accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our
methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification among all 38
teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this
competition. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.4729 | [
"Kaiming He",
"Xiangyu Zhang",
"Shaoqing Ren",
"Jian Sun"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | This manuscript is the accepted version for IEEE Transactions on
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (TPAMI) 2015. See Changelog | null | cs.CV | 20140618 | 20150423 | [] |
1406.4729 | 1 | The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net, we compute the feature maps from the entire
image only once, and then pool features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length representations for training
the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in
image classification among all 38 teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this competition.
Index Terms —Convolutional Neural Networks, Spatial Pyramid Pooling, Image Classification, Object Detection
F
1 I NTRODUCTION
We are witnessing a rapid, revolutionary change in
our vision community, mainly caused by deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) [1] and the availability of large scale training data [2]. Deep-networksbased approaches have recently been substantially
improving upon the state of the art in image classification [3], [4], [5], [6], object detection [7], [8], [5], | 1406.4729 | Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition | Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size
(e.g., 224x224) input image. This requirement is "artificial" and may reduce
the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary
size/scale. In this work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy,
"spatial pyramid pooling", to eliminate the above requirement. The new network
structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation
regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid pooling is also robust to object
deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all
CNN-based image classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we
demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN architectures
despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101
datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-the-art classification results using a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net,
we compute the feature maps from the entire image only once, and then pool
features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length
representations for training the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly
computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102x faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable
accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our
methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification among all 38
teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this
competition. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.4729 | [
"Kaiming He",
"Xiangyu Zhang",
"Shaoqing Ren",
"Jian Sun"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | This manuscript is the accepted version for IEEE Transactions on
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (TPAMI) 2015. See Changelog | null | cs.CV | 20140618 | 20150423 | [] |
1406.4729 | 2 | improving upon the state of the art in image classification [3], [4], [5], [6], object detection [7], [8], [5],
many other recognition tasks [9], [10], [11], [12], and
even non-recognition tasks.
However, there is a technical issue in the training
and testing of the CNNs: the prevalent CNNs require
afixed input image size ( e.g., 224224), which limits
both the aspect ratio and the scale of the input image.
When applied to images of arbitrary sizes, current
methods mostly fit the input image to the fixed size,
either via cropping [3], [4] or via warping [13], [7],
as shown in Figure 1 (top). But the cropped region
may not contain the entire object, while the warped
content may result in unwanted geometric distortion.
Recognition accuracy can be compromised due to the
content loss or distortion. Besides, a pre-defined scale
K. He and J. Sun are with Microsoft Research, Beijing, China. E-mail:
fkahe,jiansung@microsoft.com
X. Zhang is with Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China. Email: | 1406.4729 | Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition | Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size
(e.g., 224x224) input image. This requirement is "artificial" and may reduce
the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary
size/scale. In this work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy,
"spatial pyramid pooling", to eliminate the above requirement. The new network
structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation
regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid pooling is also robust to object
deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all
CNN-based image classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we
demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN architectures
despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101
datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-the-art classification results using a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net,
we compute the feature maps from the entire image only once, and then pool
features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length
representations for training the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly
computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102x faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable
accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our
methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification among all 38
teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this
competition. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.4729 | [
"Kaiming He",
"Xiangyu Zhang",
"Shaoqing Ren",
"Jian Sun"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | This manuscript is the accepted version for IEEE Transactions on
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (TPAMI) 2015. See Changelog | null | cs.CV | 20140618 | 20150423 | [] |
1406.4729 | 3 | fkahe,jiansung@microsoft.com
X. Zhang is with Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China. Email:
xyz.clx@stu.xjtu.edu.cn
S. Ren is with University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei,
China. Email: sqren@mail.ustc.edu.cn
This work was done when X. Zhang and S. Ren were interns at Microsoft
Research.
crop warp
spatial pyramid poolingcrop / warp
conv layers image fc layers outputimage conv layers fc layers outputFigure 1: Top: cropping or warping to fit a fixed
size. Middle: a conventional CNN. Bottom: our spatial
pyramid pooling network structure.
may not be suitable when object scales vary. Fixing
input sizes overlooks the issues involving scales.
So why do CNNs require a fixed input size? A CNN
mainly consists of two parts: convolutional layers,
and fully-connected layers that follow. The convolutional layers operate in a sliding-window manner
and output feature maps which represent the spatial
arrangement of the activations (Figure 2). In fact, convolutional layers do not require a fixed image size and | 1406.4729 | Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition | Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size
(e.g., 224x224) input image. This requirement is "artificial" and may reduce
the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary
size/scale. In this work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy,
"spatial pyramid pooling", to eliminate the above requirement. The new network
structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation
regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid pooling is also robust to object
deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all
CNN-based image classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we
demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN architectures
despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101
datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-the-art classification results using a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net,
we compute the feature maps from the entire image only once, and then pool
features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length
representations for training the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly
computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102x faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable
accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our
methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification among all 38
teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this
competition. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.4729 | [
"Kaiming He",
"Xiangyu Zhang",
"Shaoqing Ren",
"Jian Sun"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | This manuscript is the accepted version for IEEE Transactions on
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (TPAMI) 2015. See Changelog | null | cs.CV | 20140618 | 20150423 | [] |
1406.4729 | 4 | and output feature maps which represent the spatial
arrangement of the activations (Figure 2). In fact, convolutional layers do not require a fixed image size and
can generate feature maps of any sizes. On the other
hand, the fully-connected layers need to have fixedsize/length input by their definition. Hence, the fixedsize constraint comes only from the fully-connected
layers, which exist at a deeper stage of the network.
In this paper, we introduce a spatial pyramid pooling (SPP) [14], [15] layer to remove the fixed-size
constraint of the network. Specifically, we add anarXiv:1406.4729v4 [cs.CV] 23 Apr 2015
2
SPP layer on top of the last convolutional layer. The
SPP layer pools the features and generates fixedlength outputs, which are then fed into the fullyconnected layers (or other classifiers). In other words,
we perform some information “aggregation” at a
deeper stage of the network hierarchy (between convolutional layers and fully-connected layers) to avoid
the need for cropping or warping at the beginning. | 1406.4729 | Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition | Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size
(e.g., 224x224) input image. This requirement is "artificial" and may reduce
the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary
size/scale. In this work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy,
"spatial pyramid pooling", to eliminate the above requirement. The new network
structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation
regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid pooling is also robust to object
deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all
CNN-based image classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we
demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN architectures
despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101
datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-the-art classification results using a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net,
we compute the feature maps from the entire image only once, and then pool
features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length
representations for training the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly
computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102x faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable
accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our
methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification among all 38
teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this
competition. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.4729 | [
"Kaiming He",
"Xiangyu Zhang",
"Shaoqing Ren",
"Jian Sun"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | This manuscript is the accepted version for IEEE Transactions on
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (TPAMI) 2015. See Changelog | null | cs.CV | 20140618 | 20150423 | [] |
1406.4729 | 5 | deeper stage of the network hierarchy (between convolutional layers and fully-connected layers) to avoid
the need for cropping or warping at the beginning.
Figure 1 (bottom) shows the change of the network
architecture by introducing the SPP layer. We call the
new network structure SPP-net .
Spatial pyramid pooling [14], [15] (popularly
known as spatial pyramid matching or SPM [15]), as
an extension of the Bag-of-Words (BoW) model [16],
is one of the most successful methods in computer
vision. It partitions the image into divisions from
finer to coarser levels, and aggregates local features
in them. SPP has long been a key component in the
leading and competition-winning systems for classification ( e.g., [17], [18], [19]) and detection ( e.g., [20])
before the recent prevalence of CNNs. Nevertheless,
SPP has not been considered in the context of CNNs.
We note that SPP has several remarkable properties
for deep CNNs: 1) SPP is able to generate a fixedlength output regardless of the input size, while the
sliding window pooling used in the previous deep
networks [3] cannot; 2) SPP uses multi-level spatial | 1406.4729 | Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition | Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size
(e.g., 224x224) input image. This requirement is "artificial" and may reduce
the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary
size/scale. In this work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy,
"spatial pyramid pooling", to eliminate the above requirement. The new network
structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation
regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid pooling is also robust to object
deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all
CNN-based image classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we
demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN architectures
despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101
datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-the-art classification results using a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net,
we compute the feature maps from the entire image only once, and then pool
features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length
representations for training the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly
computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102x faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable
accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our
methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification among all 38
teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this
competition. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.4729 | [
"Kaiming He",
"Xiangyu Zhang",
"Shaoqing Ren",
"Jian Sun"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | This manuscript is the accepted version for IEEE Transactions on
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (TPAMI) 2015. See Changelog | null | cs.CV | 20140618 | 20150423 | [] |
1406.4729 | 6 | sliding window pooling used in the previous deep
networks [3] cannot; 2) SPP uses multi-level spatial
bins, while the sliding window pooling uses only
a single window size. Multi-level pooling has been
shown to be robust to object deformations [15]; 3) SPP
can pool features extracted at variable scales thanks
to the flexibility of input scales. Through experiments
we show that all these factors elevate the recognition
accuracy of deep networks.
SPP-net not only makes it possible to generate representations from arbitrarily sized images/windows
for testing, but also allows us to feed images with
varying sizes or scales during training. Training with
variable-size images increases scale-invariance and
reduces over-fitting. We develop a simple multi-size
training method. For a single network to accept
variable input sizes, we approximate it by multiple
networks that share all parameters, while each of
these networks is trained using a fixed input size. In
each epoch we train the network with a given input
size, and switch to another input size for the next
epoch. Experiments show that this multi-size training
converges just as the traditional single-size training,
and leads to better testing accuracy. | 1406.4729 | Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition | Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size
(e.g., 224x224) input image. This requirement is "artificial" and may reduce
the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary
size/scale. In this work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy,
"spatial pyramid pooling", to eliminate the above requirement. The new network
structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation
regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid pooling is also robust to object
deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all
CNN-based image classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we
demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN architectures
despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101
datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-the-art classification results using a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net,
we compute the feature maps from the entire image only once, and then pool
features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length
representations for training the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly
computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102x faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable
accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our
methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification among all 38
teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this
competition. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.4729 | [
"Kaiming He",
"Xiangyu Zhang",
"Shaoqing Ren",
"Jian Sun"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | This manuscript is the accepted version for IEEE Transactions on
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (TPAMI) 2015. See Changelog | null | cs.CV | 20140618 | 20150423 | [] |
1406.4729 | 7 | epoch. Experiments show that this multi-size training
converges just as the traditional single-size training,
and leads to better testing accuracy.
The advantages of SPP are orthogonal to the specific
CNN designs. In a series of controlled experiments on
the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we demonstrate that SPP
improves four different CNN architectures in existing
publications [3], [4], [5] (or their modifications), over
the no-SPP counterparts. These architectures have
various filter numbers/sizes, strides, depths, or other
designs. It is thus reasonable for us to conjecture
that SPP should improve more sophisticated (deeperand larger) convolutional architectures. SPP-net also
shows state-of-the-art classification results on Caltech101 [21] and Pascal VOC 2007 [22] using only a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
SPP-net also shows great strength in object detection. In the leading object detection method R-CNN
[7], the features from candidate windows are extracted
via deep convolutional networks. This method shows
remarkable detection accuracy on both the VOC and
ImageNet datasets. But the feature computation in RCNN is time-consuming, because it repeatedly applies | 1406.4729 | Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition | Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size
(e.g., 224x224) input image. This requirement is "artificial" and may reduce
the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary
size/scale. In this work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy,
"spatial pyramid pooling", to eliminate the above requirement. The new network
structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation
regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid pooling is also robust to object
deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all
CNN-based image classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we
demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN architectures
despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101
datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-the-art classification results using a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net,
we compute the feature maps from the entire image only once, and then pool
features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length
representations for training the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly
computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102x faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable
accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our
methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification among all 38
teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this
competition. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.4729 | [
"Kaiming He",
"Xiangyu Zhang",
"Shaoqing Ren",
"Jian Sun"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | This manuscript is the accepted version for IEEE Transactions on
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (TPAMI) 2015. See Changelog | null | cs.CV | 20140618 | 20150423 | [] |
1406.4729 | 8 | remarkable detection accuracy on both the VOC and
ImageNet datasets. But the feature computation in RCNN is time-consuming, because it repeatedly applies
the deep convolutional networks to the raw pixels
of thousands of warped regions per image. In this
paper, we show that we can run the convolutional
layers only once on the entire image (regardless of
the number of windows), and then extract features
by SPP-net on the feature maps. This method yields
a speedup of over one hundred times over R-CNN.
Note that training/running a detector on the feature
maps (rather than image regions) is actually a more
popular idea [23], [24], [20], [5]. But SPP-net inherits
the power of the deep CNN feature maps and also the
flexibility of SPP on arbitrary window sizes, which
leads to outstanding accuracy and efficiency. In our
experiment, the SPP-net-based system (built upon the
R-CNN pipeline) computes features 24-102 faster
than R-CNN, while has better or comparable accuracy.
With the recent fast proposal method of EdgeBoxes
[25], our system takes 0.5 seconds processing an image
(including all steps ). This makes our method practical
for real-world applications. | 1406.4729 | Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition | Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size
(e.g., 224x224) input image. This requirement is "artificial" and may reduce
the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary
size/scale. In this work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy,
"spatial pyramid pooling", to eliminate the above requirement. The new network
structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation
regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid pooling is also robust to object
deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all
CNN-based image classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we
demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN architectures
despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101
datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-the-art classification results using a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net,
we compute the feature maps from the entire image only once, and then pool
features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length
representations for training the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly
computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102x faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable
accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our
methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification among all 38
teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this
competition. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.4729 | [
"Kaiming He",
"Xiangyu Zhang",
"Shaoqing Ren",
"Jian Sun"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | This manuscript is the accepted version for IEEE Transactions on
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (TPAMI) 2015. See Changelog | null | cs.CV | 20140618 | 20150423 | [] |
1406.4729 | 9 | [25], our system takes 0.5 seconds processing an image
(including all steps ). This makes our method practical
for real-world applications.
A preliminary version of this manuscript has been
published in ECCV 2014. Based on this work, we
attended the competition of ILSVRC 2014 [26], and
ranked #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification (both are provided-data-only tracks) among
all 38 teams. There are a few modifications made
for ILSVRC 2014. We show that the SPP-nets can
boost various networks that are deeper and larger
(Sec. 3.1.2-3.1.4) over the no-SPP counterparts. Further, driven by our detection framework, we find
that multi-view testing on feature maps with flexibly
located/sized windows (Sec. 3.1.5) can increase the
classification accuracy. This manuscript also provides
the details of these modifications.
We have released the code to facilitate future research ( http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/kahe/ ).
2 D EEP NETWORKS WITH SPATIAL PYRAMIDPOOLING
2.1 Convolutional Layers and Feature Maps | 1406.4729 | Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition | Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size
(e.g., 224x224) input image. This requirement is "artificial" and may reduce
the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary
size/scale. In this work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy,
"spatial pyramid pooling", to eliminate the above requirement. The new network
structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation
regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid pooling is also robust to object
deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all
CNN-based image classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we
demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN architectures
despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101
datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-the-art classification results using a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net,
we compute the feature maps from the entire image only once, and then pool
features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length
representations for training the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly
computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102x faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable
accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our
methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification among all 38
teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this
competition. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.4729 | [
"Kaiming He",
"Xiangyu Zhang",
"Shaoqing Ren",
"Jian Sun"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | This manuscript is the accepted version for IEEE Transactions on
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (TPAMI) 2015. See Changelog | null | cs.CV | 20140618 | 20150423 | [] |
1406.4729 | 10 | 2 D EEP NETWORKS WITH SPATIAL PYRAMIDPOOLING
2.1 Convolutional Layers and Feature Maps
Consider the popular seven-layer architectures [3], [4].
The first five layers are convolutional, some of which
are followed by pooling layers. These pooling layers
can also be considered as “convolutional”, in the sense
that they are using sliding windows. The last two
3
filter #175
filter #55
(a) image (b) feature maps (c) strongest activations
filter #66
filter #118
(a) image (b) feature maps (c) strongest activations
Figure 2: Visualization of the feature maps. (a) Two images in Pascal VOC 2007. (b) The feature maps of some
conv 5filters. The arrows indicate the strongest responses and their corresponding positions in the images.
(c) The ImageNet images that have the strongest responses of the corresponding filters. The green rectangles
mark the receptive fields of the strongest responses.
layers are fully connected, with an N-way softmax as
the output, where N is the number of categories.
The deep network described above needs a fixed | 1406.4729 | Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition | Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size
(e.g., 224x224) input image. This requirement is "artificial" and may reduce
the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary
size/scale. In this work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy,
"spatial pyramid pooling", to eliminate the above requirement. The new network
structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation
regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid pooling is also robust to object
deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all
CNN-based image classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we
demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN architectures
despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101
datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-the-art classification results using a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net,
we compute the feature maps from the entire image only once, and then pool
features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length
representations for training the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly
computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102x faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable
accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our
methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification among all 38
teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this
competition. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.4729 | [
"Kaiming He",
"Xiangyu Zhang",
"Shaoqing Ren",
"Jian Sun"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | This manuscript is the accepted version for IEEE Transactions on
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (TPAMI) 2015. See Changelog | null | cs.CV | 20140618 | 20150423 | [] |
1406.4729 | 11 | layers are fully connected, with an N-way softmax as
the output, where N is the number of categories.
The deep network described above needs a fixed
image size. However, we notice that the requirement
of fixed sizes is only due to the fully-connected layers
that demand fixed-length vectors as inputs. On the
other hand, the convolutional layers accept inputs of
arbitrary sizes. The convolutional layers use sliding
filters, and their outputs have roughly the same aspect
ratio as the inputs. These outputs are known as feature
maps [1] - they involve not only the strength of the
responses, but also their spatial positions.
In Figure 2, we visualize some feature maps. They
are generated by some filters of the conv 5layer. Figure 2(c) shows the strongest activated images of these
filters in the ImageNet dataset. We see a filter can be
activated by some semantic content. For example, the
55-th filter (Figure 2, bottom left) is most activated by
a circle shape; the 66-th filter (Figure 2, top right) is | 1406.4729 | Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition | Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size
(e.g., 224x224) input image. This requirement is "artificial" and may reduce
the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary
size/scale. In this work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy,
"spatial pyramid pooling", to eliminate the above requirement. The new network
structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation
regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid pooling is also robust to object
deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all
CNN-based image classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we
demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN architectures
despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101
datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-the-art classification results using a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net,
we compute the feature maps from the entire image only once, and then pool
features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length
representations for training the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly
computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102x faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable
accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our
methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification among all 38
teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this
competition. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.4729 | [
"Kaiming He",
"Xiangyu Zhang",
"Shaoqing Ren",
"Jian Sun"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | This manuscript is the accepted version for IEEE Transactions on
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (TPAMI) 2015. See Changelog | null | cs.CV | 20140618 | 20150423 | [] |
1406.4729 | 12 | a circle shape; the 66-th filter (Figure 2, top right) is
most activated by a ^-shape; and the 118-th filter (Figure 2, bottom right) is most activated by a _-shape.
These shapes in the input images (Figure 2(a)) activate
the feature maps at the corresponding positions (the
arrows in Figure 2).
It is worth noticing that we generate the feature
maps in Figure 2 without fixing the input size. These
feature maps generated by deep convolutional layers are analogous to the feature maps in traditional
methods [27], [28]. In those methods, SIFT vectors
[29] or image patches [28] are densely extracted and
then encoded, e.g., by vector quantization [16], [15],
[30], sparse coding [17], [18], or Fisher kernels [19].
These encoded features consist of the feature maps,
and are then pooled by Bag-of-Words (BoW) [16] or
spatial pyramids [14], [15]. Analogously, the deep
convolutional features can be pooled in a similar way.
2.2 The Spatial Pyramid Pooling Layer
The convolutional layers accept arbitrary input sizes, | 1406.4729 | Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition | Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size
(e.g., 224x224) input image. This requirement is "artificial" and may reduce
the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary
size/scale. In this work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy,
"spatial pyramid pooling", to eliminate the above requirement. The new network
structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation
regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid pooling is also robust to object
deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all
CNN-based image classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we
demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN architectures
despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101
datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-the-art classification results using a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net,
we compute the feature maps from the entire image only once, and then pool
features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length
representations for training the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly
computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102x faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable
accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our
methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification among all 38
teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this
competition. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.4729 | [
"Kaiming He",
"Xiangyu Zhang",
"Shaoqing Ren",
"Jian Sun"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | This manuscript is the accepted version for IEEE Transactions on
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (TPAMI) 2015. See Changelog | null | cs.CV | 20140618 | 20150423 | [] |
1406.4729 | 13 | convolutional features can be pooled in a similar way.
2.2 The Spatial Pyramid Pooling Layer
The convolutional layers accept arbitrary input sizes,
but they produce outputs of variable sizes. The classifiers (SVM/softmax) or fully-connected layers require
convolutional layersfeature maps of conv 5
(arbitrary size)
fixed-length representation
input image16×256-d 4×256-d 256-d…...
…...
spatial pyramid pooling layerfully-connected layers (fc 6, fc 7)Figure 3: A network structure with a spatial pyramid
pooling layer . Here 256 is the filter number of the
conv 5layer, and conv 5is the last convolutional layer.
fixed-length vectors. Such vectors can be generated
by the Bag-of-Words (BoW) approach [16] that pools
the features together. Spatial pyramid pooling [14],
[15] improves BoW in that it can maintain spatial
information by pooling in local spatial bins. These
spatial bins have sizes proportional to the image size,
so the number of bins is fixed regardless of the image
size. This is in contrast to the sliding window pooling
of the previous deep networks [3], where the number | 1406.4729 | Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition | Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size
(e.g., 224x224) input image. This requirement is "artificial" and may reduce
the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary
size/scale. In this work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy,
"spatial pyramid pooling", to eliminate the above requirement. The new network
structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation
regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid pooling is also robust to object
deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all
CNN-based image classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we
demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN architectures
despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101
datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-the-art classification results using a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net,
we compute the feature maps from the entire image only once, and then pool
features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length
representations for training the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly
computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102x faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable
accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our
methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification among all 38
teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this
competition. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.4729 | [
"Kaiming He",
"Xiangyu Zhang",
"Shaoqing Ren",
"Jian Sun"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | This manuscript is the accepted version for IEEE Transactions on
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (TPAMI) 2015. See Changelog | null | cs.CV | 20140618 | 20150423 | [] |
1406.4729 | 14 | so the number of bins is fixed regardless of the image
size. This is in contrast to the sliding window pooling
of the previous deep networks [3], where the number
of sliding windows depends on the input size.
To adopt the deep network for images of arbitrary sizes, we replace the last pooling layer ( e.g.,
pool 5, after the last convolutional layer) with a spatial
pyramid pooling layer . Figure 3 illustrates our method.
In each spatial bin, we pool the responses of each
filter (throughout this paper we use max pooling).
The outputs of the spatial pyramid pooling are kMdimensional vectors with the number of bins denoted
asM(kis the number of filters in the last convolutional layer). The fixed-dimensional vectors are the
input to the fully-connected layer.
With spatial pyramid pooling, the input image can
4
be of any sizes. This not only allows arbitrary aspect
ratios, but also allows arbitrary scales. We can resize
the input image to any scale ( e.g.,min(w;h)=180, 224,
...) and apply the same deep network. When the
input image is at different scales, the network (with
the same filter sizes) will extract features at different | 1406.4729 | Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition | Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size
(e.g., 224x224) input image. This requirement is "artificial" and may reduce
the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary
size/scale. In this work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy,
"spatial pyramid pooling", to eliminate the above requirement. The new network
structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation
regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid pooling is also robust to object
deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all
CNN-based image classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we
demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN architectures
despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101
datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-the-art classification results using a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net,
we compute the feature maps from the entire image only once, and then pool
features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length
representations for training the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly
computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102x faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable
accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our
methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification among all 38
teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this
competition. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.4729 | [
"Kaiming He",
"Xiangyu Zhang",
"Shaoqing Ren",
"Jian Sun"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | This manuscript is the accepted version for IEEE Transactions on
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (TPAMI) 2015. See Changelog | null | cs.CV | 20140618 | 20150423 | [] |
1406.4729 | 15 | ...) and apply the same deep network. When the
input image is at different scales, the network (with
the same filter sizes) will extract features at different
scales. The scales play important roles in traditional
methods, e.g., the SIFT vectors are often extracted at
multiple scales [29], [27] (determined by the sizes of
the patches and Gaussian filters). We will show that
the scales are also important for the accuracy of deep
networks.
Interestingly, the coarsest pyramid level has a single
bin that covers the entire image. This is in fact a
“global pooling” operation, which is also investigated
in several concurrent works. In [31], [32] a global
average pooling is used to reduce the model size
and also reduce overfitting; in [33], a global average
pooling is used on the testing stage after all fc layers
to improve accuracy; in [34], a global max pooling is
used for weakly supervised object recognition. The
global pooling operation corresponds to the traditional Bag-of-Words method.
2.3 Training the Network
Theoretically, the above network structure can be
trained with standard back-propagation [1], regardless of the input image size. But in practice the GPU | 1406.4729 | Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition | Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size
(e.g., 224x224) input image. This requirement is "artificial" and may reduce
the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary
size/scale. In this work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy,
"spatial pyramid pooling", to eliminate the above requirement. The new network
structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation
regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid pooling is also robust to object
deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all
CNN-based image classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we
demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN architectures
despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101
datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-the-art classification results using a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net,
we compute the feature maps from the entire image only once, and then pool
features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length
representations for training the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly
computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102x faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable
accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our
methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification among all 38
teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this
competition. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.4729 | [
"Kaiming He",
"Xiangyu Zhang",
"Shaoqing Ren",
"Jian Sun"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | This manuscript is the accepted version for IEEE Transactions on
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (TPAMI) 2015. See Changelog | null | cs.CV | 20140618 | 20150423 | [] |
1406.4729 | 16 | Theoretically, the above network structure can be
trained with standard back-propagation [1], regardless of the input image size. But in practice the GPU
implementations (such as cuda-convnet [3] and Caffe
[35]) are preferably run on fixed input images. Next
we describe our training solution that takes advantage
of these GPU implementations while still preserving
the spatial pyramid pooling behaviors.
Single-size training
As in previous works, we first consider a network taking a fixed-size input (224 224) cropped from images.
The cropping is for the purpose of data augmentation.
For an image with a given size, we can pre-compute
the bin sizes needed for spatial pyramid pooling.
Consider the feature maps after conv 5that have a size
ofaa(e.g., 1313). With a pyramid level of nn
bins, we implement this pooling level as a sliding
window pooling, where the window size win=da=ne
and stride str=ba=ncwithdeandbcdenoting
ceiling and floor operations. With an l-level pyramid,
we implement lsuch layers. The next fully-connected
layer (fc 6) will concatenate the loutputs. Figure 4 | 1406.4729 | Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition | Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size
(e.g., 224x224) input image. This requirement is "artificial" and may reduce
the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary
size/scale. In this work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy,
"spatial pyramid pooling", to eliminate the above requirement. The new network
structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation
regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid pooling is also robust to object
deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all
CNN-based image classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we
demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN architectures
despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101
datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-the-art classification results using a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net,
we compute the feature maps from the entire image only once, and then pool
features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length
representations for training the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly
computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102x faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable
accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our
methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification among all 38
teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this
competition. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.4729 | [
"Kaiming He",
"Xiangyu Zhang",
"Shaoqing Ren",
"Jian Sun"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | This manuscript is the accepted version for IEEE Transactions on
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (TPAMI) 2015. See Changelog | null | cs.CV | 20140618 | 20150423 | [] |
1406.4729 | 17 | we implement lsuch layers. The next fully-connected
layer (fc 6) will concatenate the loutputs. Figure 4
shows an example configuration of 3-level pyramid
pooling (33, 22, 11) in the cuda-convnet style [3].
The main purpose of our single-size training is to
enable the multi-level pooling behavior. Experiments
show that this is one reason for the gain of accuracy.
Multi-size training
Our network with SPP is expected to be applied on
images of any sizes. To address the issue of varying
[fc6]
type=fcoutputs=4096inputs=pool3x3,pool2x2,pool1x1[pool1x1]
type=poolpool=maxinputs=conv5sizeX=13stride=13[pool3x3]
type=poolpool=maxinputs=conv5sizeX=5stride=4[pool2x2]
type=poolpool=maxinputs=conv5sizeX=7stride=6Figure 4: An example 3-level pyramid pooling in the
cuda-convnet style [3]. Here sizeX is the size of the
pooling window. This configuration is for a network | 1406.4729 | Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition | Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size
(e.g., 224x224) input image. This requirement is "artificial" and may reduce
the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary
size/scale. In this work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy,
"spatial pyramid pooling", to eliminate the above requirement. The new network
structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation
regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid pooling is also robust to object
deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all
CNN-based image classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we
demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN architectures
despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101
datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-the-art classification results using a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net,
we compute the feature maps from the entire image only once, and then pool
features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length
representations for training the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly
computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102x faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable
accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our
methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification among all 38
teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this
competition. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.4729 | [
"Kaiming He",
"Xiangyu Zhang",
"Shaoqing Ren",
"Jian Sun"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | This manuscript is the accepted version for IEEE Transactions on
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (TPAMI) 2015. See Changelog | null | cs.CV | 20140618 | 20150423 | [] |
1406.4729 | 18 | cuda-convnet style [3]. Here sizeX is the size of the
pooling window. This configuration is for a network
whose feature map size of conv 5is 1313, so the
pool 33, pool 22, and pool 11layers will have 3 3,
22, and 11 bins respectively.
image sizes in training, we consider a set of predefined sizes. We consider two sizes: 180 180 in addition to 224224. Rather than crop a smaller 180 180
region, we resize the aforementioned 224 224 region
to 180180. So the regions at both scales differ only
in resolution but not in content/layout. For the network to accept 180 180 inputs, we implement another
fixed-size-input (180 180) network. The feature map
size after conv 5isaa= 1010 in this case. Then we
still usewin=da=neandstr=ba=ncto implement
each pyramid pooling level. The output of the spatial
pyramid pooling layer of this 180-network has the
same fixed length as the 224-network. As such, this
180-network has exactly the same parameters as the | 1406.4729 | Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition | Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size
(e.g., 224x224) input image. This requirement is "artificial" and may reduce
the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary
size/scale. In this work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy,
"spatial pyramid pooling", to eliminate the above requirement. The new network
structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation
regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid pooling is also robust to object
deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all
CNN-based image classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we
demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN architectures
despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101
datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-the-art classification results using a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net,
we compute the feature maps from the entire image only once, and then pool
features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length
representations for training the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly
computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102x faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable
accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our
methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification among all 38
teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this
competition. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.4729 | [
"Kaiming He",
"Xiangyu Zhang",
"Shaoqing Ren",
"Jian Sun"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | This manuscript is the accepted version for IEEE Transactions on
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (TPAMI) 2015. See Changelog | null | cs.CV | 20140618 | 20150423 | [] |
1406.4729 | 19 | same fixed length as the 224-network. As such, this
180-network has exactly the same parameters as the
224-network in each layer. In other words, during
training we implement the varying-input-size SPP-net
by two fixed-size networks that share parameters.
To reduce the overhead to switch from one network
(e.g., 224) to the other ( e.g., 180), we train each full
epoch on one network, and then switch to the other
one (keeping all weights) for the next full epoch. This
is iterated. In experiments, we find the convergence
rate of this multi-size training to be similar to the
above single-size training.
The main purpose of our multi-size training is to
simulate the varying input sizes while still leveraging
the existing well-optimized fixed-size implementations. Besides the above two-scale implementation, we
have also tested a variant using ssas input where
sis randomly and uniformly sampled from [180;224]
at each epoch. We report the results of both variants
in the experiment section.
Note that the above single/multi-size solutions are
for training only. At the testing stage, it is straightforward to apply SPP-net on images of any sizes.
5 | 1406.4729 | Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition | Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size
(e.g., 224x224) input image. This requirement is "artificial" and may reduce
the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary
size/scale. In this work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy,
"spatial pyramid pooling", to eliminate the above requirement. The new network
structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation
regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid pooling is also robust to object
deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all
CNN-based image classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we
demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN architectures
despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101
datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-the-art classification results using a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net,
we compute the feature maps from the entire image only once, and then pool
features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length
representations for training the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly
computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102x faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable
accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our
methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification among all 38
teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this
competition. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.4729 | [
"Kaiming He",
"Xiangyu Zhang",
"Shaoqing Ren",
"Jian Sun"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | This manuscript is the accepted version for IEEE Transactions on
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (TPAMI) 2015. See Changelog | null | cs.CV | 20140618 | 20150423 | [] |
1406.4729 | 20 | Note that the above single/multi-size solutions are
for training only. At the testing stage, it is straightforward to apply SPP-net on images of any sizes.
5
model conv 1 conv 2 conv 3 conv 4 conv 5 conv 6 conv 7
ZF-5 9672, str 2 25652, str 2 384323843225632
LRN, pool 32, str 2 LRN, pool 32, str 2 - map size 5555 2727 1313 1313 1313
Convnet*-5 96112, str 4 25652384323843225632
LRN, LRN, pool 32, str 2 pool 32, 2 - map size 5555 2727 1313 1313 1313
Overfeat-5/7 9672, str 2 256525123251232512325123251232
pool 32, str 3, LRN pool 22, str 2
map size 3636 1818 1818 1818 1818 1818 1818
Table 1: Network architectures: filter number filter size ( e.g.,9672), filter stride ( e.g., str 2), pooling window | 1406.4729 | Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition | Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size
(e.g., 224x224) input image. This requirement is "artificial" and may reduce
the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary
size/scale. In this work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy,
"spatial pyramid pooling", to eliminate the above requirement. The new network
structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation
regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid pooling is also robust to object
deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all
CNN-based image classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we
demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN architectures
despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101
datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-the-art classification results using a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net,
we compute the feature maps from the entire image only once, and then pool
features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length
representations for training the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly
computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102x faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable
accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our
methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification among all 38
teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this
competition. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.4729 | [
"Kaiming He",
"Xiangyu Zhang",
"Shaoqing Ren",
"Jian Sun"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | This manuscript is the accepted version for IEEE Transactions on
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (TPAMI) 2015. See Changelog | null | cs.CV | 20140618 | 20150423 | [] |
1406.4729 | 21 | size ( e.g., pool 32), and the output feature map size ( e.g., map size 5555). LRN represents Local Response
Normalization. The padding is adjusted to produce the expected output feature map size.
3 SPP- NET FOR IMAGE CLASSIFICATION
3.1 Experiments on ImageNet 2012 Classification
We train the networks on the 1000-category training
set of ImageNet 2012. Our training algorithm follows
the practices of previous work [3], [4], [36]. The images are resized so that the smaller dimension is 256,
and a 224224 crop is picked from the center or the
four corners from the entire image1. The data are augmented by horizontal flipping and color altering [3].
Dropout [3] is used on the two fully-connected layers.
The learning rate starts from 0.01, and is divided by 10
(twice) when the error plateaus. Our implementation
is based on the publicly available code of cuda-convnet
[3] and Caffe [35]. All networks in this paper can be
trained on a single GeForce GTX Titan GPU (6 GB
memory) within two to four weeks.
3.1.1 Baseline Network Architectures
The advantages of SPP are independent of the convolutional network architectures used. We investigate | 1406.4729 | Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition | Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size
(e.g., 224x224) input image. This requirement is "artificial" and may reduce
the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary
size/scale. In this work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy,
"spatial pyramid pooling", to eliminate the above requirement. The new network
structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation
regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid pooling is also robust to object
deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all
CNN-based image classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we
demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN architectures
despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101
datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-the-art classification results using a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net,
we compute the feature maps from the entire image only once, and then pool
features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length
representations for training the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly
computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102x faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable
accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our
methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification among all 38
teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this
competition. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.4729 | [
"Kaiming He",
"Xiangyu Zhang",
"Shaoqing Ren",
"Jian Sun"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | This manuscript is the accepted version for IEEE Transactions on
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (TPAMI) 2015. See Changelog | null | cs.CV | 20140618 | 20150423 | [] |
1406.4729 | 22 | memory) within two to four weeks.
3.1.1 Baseline Network Architectures
The advantages of SPP are independent of the convolutional network architectures used. We investigate
four different network architectures in existing publications [3], [4], [5] (or their modifications), and we
show SPP improves the accuracy of all these architectures. These baseline architectures are in Table 1 and
briefly introduced below:
ZF-5 : this architecture is based on Zeiler and Fergus’s (ZF) “fast” (smaller) model [4]. The number
indicates five convolutional layers.
Convnet*-5 : this is a modification on Krizhevsky
et al.’s network [3]. We put the two pooling layers
after conv 2and conv 3(instead of after conv 1and
conv 2). As a result, the feature maps after each
layer have the same size as ZF-5.
Overfeat-5/7 : this architecture is based on the
Overfeat paper [5], with some modifications as in
[6]. In contrast to ZF-5/Convnet*-5, this architecture produces a larger feature map ( 1818instead | 1406.4729 | Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition | Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size
(e.g., 224x224) input image. This requirement is "artificial" and may reduce
the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary
size/scale. In this work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy,
"spatial pyramid pooling", to eliminate the above requirement. The new network
structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation
regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid pooling is also robust to object
deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all
CNN-based image classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we
demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN architectures
despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101
datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-the-art classification results using a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net,
we compute the feature maps from the entire image only once, and then pool
features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length
representations for training the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly
computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102x faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable
accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our
methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification among all 38
teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this
competition. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.4729 | [
"Kaiming He",
"Xiangyu Zhang",
"Shaoqing Ren",
"Jian Sun"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | This manuscript is the accepted version for IEEE Transactions on
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (TPAMI) 2015. See Changelog | null | cs.CV | 20140618 | 20150423 | [] |
1406.4729 | 23 | [6]. In contrast to ZF-5/Convnet*-5, this architecture produces a larger feature map ( 1818instead
of1313) before the last pooling layer. A larger
filter number (512) is used in conv 3and the following convolutional layers. We also investigate
1. In [3], the four corners are picked from the corners of the
central 256256 crop.a deeper architecture with 7 convolutional layers,
where conv 3to conv 7have the same structures.
In the baseline models, the pooling layer after the last
convolutional layer generates 66feature maps, with
two 4096-d fc layers and a 1000-way softmax layer
following. Our replications of these baseline networks
are in Table 2 (a). We train 70 epochs for ZF-5 and
90 epochs for the others. Our replication of ZF-5 is
better than the one reported in [4]. This gain is because
the corner crops are from the entire image, as is also
reported in [36].
3.1.2 Multi-level Pooling Improves Accuracy
In Table 2 (b) we show the results using singlesize training. The training and testing sizes are both
224224. In these networks, the convolutional layers | 1406.4729 | Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition | Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size
(e.g., 224x224) input image. This requirement is "artificial" and may reduce
the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary
size/scale. In this work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy,
"spatial pyramid pooling", to eliminate the above requirement. The new network
structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation
regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid pooling is also robust to object
deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all
CNN-based image classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we
demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN architectures
despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101
datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-the-art classification results using a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net,
we compute the feature maps from the entire image only once, and then pool
features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length
representations for training the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly
computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102x faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable
accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our
methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification among all 38
teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this
competition. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.4729 | [
"Kaiming He",
"Xiangyu Zhang",
"Shaoqing Ren",
"Jian Sun"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | This manuscript is the accepted version for IEEE Transactions on
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (TPAMI) 2015. See Changelog | null | cs.CV | 20140618 | 20150423 | [] |
1406.4729 | 24 | In Table 2 (b) we show the results using singlesize training. The training and testing sizes are both
224224. In these networks, the convolutional layers
have the same structures as the corresponding baseline models, whereas the pooling layer after the final
convolutional layer is replaced with the SPP layer. For
the results in Table 2, we use a 4-level pyramid. The
pyramid isf66, 33, 22, 11g(totally 50 bins).
For fair comparison, we still use the standard 10view prediction with each view a 224 224 crop. Our
results in Table 2 (b) show considerable improvement
over the no-SPP baselines in Table 2 (a). Interestingly,
the largest gain of top-1 error (1.65%) is given by the
most accurate architecture. Since we are still using the
same 10 cropped views as in (a), these gains are solely
because of multi-level pooling.
It is worth noticing that the gain of multi-level
pooling is notsimply due to more parameters; rather,
it is because the multi-level pooling is robust to the
variance in object deformations and spatial layout
[15]. To show this, we train another ZF-5 network with | 1406.4729 | Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition | Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size
(e.g., 224x224) input image. This requirement is "artificial" and may reduce
the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary
size/scale. In this work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy,
"spatial pyramid pooling", to eliminate the above requirement. The new network
structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation
regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid pooling is also robust to object
deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all
CNN-based image classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we
demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN architectures
despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101
datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-the-art classification results using a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net,
we compute the feature maps from the entire image only once, and then pool
features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length
representations for training the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly
computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102x faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable
accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our
methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification among all 38
teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this
competition. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.4729 | [
"Kaiming He",
"Xiangyu Zhang",
"Shaoqing Ren",
"Jian Sun"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | This manuscript is the accepted version for IEEE Transactions on
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (TPAMI) 2015. See Changelog | null | cs.CV | 20140618 | 20150423 | [] |
1406.4729 | 25 | it is because the multi-level pooling is robust to the
variance in object deformations and spatial layout
[15]. To show this, we train another ZF-5 network with
a different 4-level pyramid: f44, 33, 22, 11g
(totally 30 bins). This network has fewer parameters
than its no-SPP counterpart, because its fc 6layer has
30256-d inputs instead of 36 256-d. The top-1/top5 errors of this network are 35.06/14.04. This result
is similar to the 50-bin pyramid above (34.98/14.14),
but considerably better than the no-SPP counterpart
(35.99/14.76).
6
top-1 error (%)
ZF-5 Convnet*-5 Overfeat-5 Overfeat-7
(a) no SPP 35.99 34.93 34.13 32.01
(b) SPP single-size trained 34.98 (1.01) 34.38 (0.55) 32.87 (1.26) 30.36 (1.65)
(c) SPP multi-size trained 34.60 (1.39) 33.94 (0.99) 32.26 (1.87) 29.68 (2.33) | 1406.4729 | Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition | Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size
(e.g., 224x224) input image. This requirement is "artificial" and may reduce
the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary
size/scale. In this work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy,
"spatial pyramid pooling", to eliminate the above requirement. The new network
structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation
regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid pooling is also robust to object
deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all
CNN-based image classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we
demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN architectures
despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101
datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-the-art classification results using a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net,
we compute the feature maps from the entire image only once, and then pool
features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length
representations for training the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly
computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102x faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable
accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our
methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification among all 38
teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this
competition. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.4729 | [
"Kaiming He",
"Xiangyu Zhang",
"Shaoqing Ren",
"Jian Sun"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | This manuscript is the accepted version for IEEE Transactions on
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (TPAMI) 2015. See Changelog | null | cs.CV | 20140618 | 20150423 | [] |
1406.4729 | 26 | top-5 error (%)
ZF-5 Convnet*-5 Overfeat-5 Overfeat-7
(a) no SPP 14.76 13.92 13.52 11.97
(b) SPP single-size trained 14.14 (0.62) 13.54 (0.38) 12.80 (0.72) 11.12 (0.85)
(c) SPP multi-size trained 13.64 (1.12) 13.33 (0.59) 12.33 (1.19) 10.95 (1.02)
Table 2: Error rates in the validation set of ImageNet 2012. All the results are obtained using standard 10-view
testing. In the brackets are the gains over the “no SPP” baselines.
SPP on test view top-1 val
ZF-5, single-size trained 1 crop 38.01
ZF-5, single-size trained 1 full 37.55
ZF-5, multi-size trained 1 crop 37.57
ZF-5, multi-size trained 1 full 37.07
Overfeat-7, single-size trained 1 crop 33.18
Overfeat-7, single-size trained 1 full 32.72
Overfeat-7, multi-size trained 1 crop 32.57 | 1406.4729 | Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition | Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size
(e.g., 224x224) input image. This requirement is "artificial" and may reduce
the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary
size/scale. In this work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy,
"spatial pyramid pooling", to eliminate the above requirement. The new network
structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation
regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid pooling is also robust to object
deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all
CNN-based image classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we
demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN architectures
despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101
datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-the-art classification results using a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net,
we compute the feature maps from the entire image only once, and then pool
features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length
representations for training the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly
computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102x faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable
accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our
methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification among all 38
teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this
competition. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.4729 | [
"Kaiming He",
"Xiangyu Zhang",
"Shaoqing Ren",
"Jian Sun"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | This manuscript is the accepted version for IEEE Transactions on
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (TPAMI) 2015. See Changelog | null | cs.CV | 20140618 | 20150423 | [] |
1406.4729 | 27 | Overfeat-7, single-size trained 1 full 32.72
Overfeat-7, multi-size trained 1 crop 32.57
Overfeat-7, multi-size trained 1 full 31.25
Table 3: Error rates in the validation set of ImageNet
2012 using a single view. The images are resized so
min(w;h) = 256 . The crop view is the central 224 224
of the image.
3.1.3 Multi-size Training Improves Accuracy
Table 2 (c) shows our results using multi-size training.
The training sizes are 224 and 180, while the testing
size is still 224. We still use the standard 10-view
prediction. The top-1/top-5 errors of all architectures
further drop. The top-1 error of SPP-net (Overfeat-7)
drops to 29.68%, which is 2.33% better than its noSPP counterpart and 0.68% better than its single-size
trained counterpart.
Besides using the two discrete sizes of 180 and
224, we have also evaluated using a random size
uniformly sampled from [180;224]. The top-1/5 error
of SPP-net (Overfeat-7) is 30.06%/10.96%. The top1 error is slightly worse than the two-size version, | 1406.4729 | Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition | Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size
(e.g., 224x224) input image. This requirement is "artificial" and may reduce
the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary
size/scale. In this work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy,
"spatial pyramid pooling", to eliminate the above requirement. The new network
structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation
regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid pooling is also robust to object
deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all
CNN-based image classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we
demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN architectures
despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101
datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-the-art classification results using a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net,
we compute the feature maps from the entire image only once, and then pool
features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length
representations for training the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly
computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102x faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable
accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our
methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification among all 38
teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this
competition. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.4729 | [
"Kaiming He",
"Xiangyu Zhang",
"Shaoqing Ren",
"Jian Sun"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | This manuscript is the accepted version for IEEE Transactions on
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (TPAMI) 2015. See Changelog | null | cs.CV | 20140618 | 20150423 | [] |
1406.4729 | 28 | of SPP-net (Overfeat-7) is 30.06%/10.96%. The top1 error is slightly worse than the two-size version,
possibly because the size of 224 (which is used for
testing) is visited less. But the results are still better
the single-size version.
There are previous CNN solutions [5], [36] that deal
with various scales/sizes, but they are mostly based
on testing. In Overfeat [5] and Howard’s method [36],
the single network is applied at multiple scales in the
testing stage, and the scores are averaged. Howard
further trains two different networks on low/highresolution image regions and averages the scores. To
our knowledge, our method is the first one that trains
a single network with input images of multiple sizes.3.1.4 Full-image Representations Improve Accuracy
Next we investigate the accuracy of the full-image
views. We resize the image so that min(w;h)=256
while maintaining its aspect ratio. The SPP-net is
applied on this full image to compute the scores of
the full view. For fair comparison, we also evaluate
the accuracy of the single view in the center 224 224
crop (which is used in the above evaluations). The
comparisons of single-view testing accuracy are in | 1406.4729 | Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition | Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size
(e.g., 224x224) input image. This requirement is "artificial" and may reduce
the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary
size/scale. In this work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy,
"spatial pyramid pooling", to eliminate the above requirement. The new network
structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation
regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid pooling is also robust to object
deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all
CNN-based image classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we
demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN architectures
despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101
datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-the-art classification results using a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net,
we compute the feature maps from the entire image only once, and then pool
features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length
representations for training the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly
computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102x faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable
accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our
methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification among all 38
teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this
competition. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.4729 | [
"Kaiming He",
"Xiangyu Zhang",
"Shaoqing Ren",
"Jian Sun"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | This manuscript is the accepted version for IEEE Transactions on
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (TPAMI) 2015. See Changelog | null | cs.CV | 20140618 | 20150423 | [] |
1406.4729 | 29 | the accuracy of the single view in the center 224 224
crop (which is used in the above evaluations). The
comparisons of single-view testing accuracy are in
Table 3. Here we evaluate ZF-5/Overfeat-7. The top-1
error rates are all reduced by the full-view representation. This shows the importance of maintaining the
complete content. Even though our network is trained
using square images only, it generalizes well to other
aspect ratios.
Comparing Table 2 and Table 3, we find that the
combination of multiple views is substantially better
than the single full-image view. However, the fullimage representations are still of good merits. First,
we empirically find that (discussed in the next subsection) even for the combination of dozens of views,
the additional two full-image views (with flipping)
can still boost the accuracy by about 0.2%. Second,
the full-image view is methodologically consistent
with the traditional methods [15], [17], [19] where the
encoded SIFT vectors of the entire image are pooled
together. Third, in other applications such as image
retrieval [37], an image representation, rather than a
classification score, is required for similarity ranking.
A full-image representation can be preferred. | 1406.4729 | Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition | Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size
(e.g., 224x224) input image. This requirement is "artificial" and may reduce
the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary
size/scale. In this work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy,
"spatial pyramid pooling", to eliminate the above requirement. The new network
structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation
regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid pooling is also robust to object
deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all
CNN-based image classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we
demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN architectures
despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101
datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-the-art classification results using a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net,
we compute the feature maps from the entire image only once, and then pool
features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length
representations for training the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly
computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102x faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable
accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our
methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification among all 38
teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this
competition. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.4729 | [
"Kaiming He",
"Xiangyu Zhang",
"Shaoqing Ren",
"Jian Sun"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | This manuscript is the accepted version for IEEE Transactions on
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (TPAMI) 2015. See Changelog | null | cs.CV | 20140618 | 20150423 | [] |
1406.4729 | 30 | retrieval [37], an image representation, rather than a
classification score, is required for similarity ranking.
A full-image representation can be preferred.
3.1.5 Multi-view Testing on Feature Maps
Inspired by our detection algorithm (described in
the next section), we further propose a multi-view
testing method on the feature maps. Thanks to the
flexibility of SPP , we can easily extract the features
from windows (views) of arbitrary sizes from the
convolutional feature maps.
On the testing stage, we resize an image so
min(w;h) =swheresrepresents a predefined scale
(like 256). Then we compute the convolutional feature maps from the entire image. For the usage of
7
method test scales test views top-1 val top-5 val top-5 test
Krizhevsky et al. [3] 1 10 40.7 18.2
Overfeat (fast) [5] 1 - 39.01 16.97
Overfeat (fast) [5] 6 - 38.12 16.27
Overfeat (big) [5] 4 - 35.74 14.18
Howard (base) [36] 3 162 37.0 15.8
Howard (high-res) [36] 3 162 36.8 16.2 | 1406.4729 | Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition | Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size
(e.g., 224x224) input image. This requirement is "artificial" and may reduce
the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary
size/scale. In this work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy,
"spatial pyramid pooling", to eliminate the above requirement. The new network
structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation
regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid pooling is also robust to object
deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all
CNN-based image classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we
demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN architectures
despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101
datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-the-art classification results using a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net,
we compute the feature maps from the entire image only once, and then pool
features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length
representations for training the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly
computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102x faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable
accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our
methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification among all 38
teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this
competition. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.4729 | [
"Kaiming He",
"Xiangyu Zhang",
"Shaoqing Ren",
"Jian Sun"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | This manuscript is the accepted version for IEEE Transactions on
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (TPAMI) 2015. See Changelog | null | cs.CV | 20140618 | 20150423 | [] |
1406.4729 | 31 | Howard (base) [36] 3 162 37.0 15.8
Howard (high-res) [36] 3 162 36.8 16.2
Zeiler & Fergus (ZF) (fast) [4] 1 10 38.4 16.5
Zeiler & Fergus (ZF) (big) [4] 1 10 37.5 16.0
Chatfield et al. [6] 1 10 - 13.1
ours (SPP O-7) 1 10 29.68 10.95
ours (SPP O-7) 6 96+2full 27.86 9.14 9.08
Table 4: Error rates in ImageNet 2012. All the results are based on a single network . The number of views in
Overfeat depends on the scales and strides, for which there are several hundreds at the finest scale.
flipped views, we also compute the feature maps of
the flipped image. Given any view (window) in the
image, we map this window to the feature maps (the
way of mapping is in Appendix), and then use SPP
to pool the features from this window (see Figure 5).
The pooled features are then fed into the fc layers
to compute the softmax score of this window. These
scores are averaged for the final prediction. For the | 1406.4729 | Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition | Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size
(e.g., 224x224) input image. This requirement is "artificial" and may reduce
the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary
size/scale. In this work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy,
"spatial pyramid pooling", to eliminate the above requirement. The new network
structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation
regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid pooling is also robust to object
deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all
CNN-based image classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we
demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN architectures
despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101
datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-the-art classification results using a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net,
we compute the feature maps from the entire image only once, and then pool
features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length
representations for training the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly
computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102x faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable
accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our
methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification among all 38
teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this
competition. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.4729 | [
"Kaiming He",
"Xiangyu Zhang",
"Shaoqing Ren",
"Jian Sun"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | This manuscript is the accepted version for IEEE Transactions on
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (TPAMI) 2015. See Changelog | null | cs.CV | 20140618 | 20150423 | [] |
1406.4729 | 32 | The pooled features are then fed into the fc layers
to compute the softmax score of this window. These
scores are averaged for the final prediction. For the
standard 10-view, we use s= 256 and the views
are 224224 windows on the corners or center. Experiments show that the top-5 error of the 10-view
prediction on feature maps is within 0.1% around the
original 10-view prediction on image crops.
We further apply this method to extract multiple
views from multiple scales. We resize the image to six
scaless2 f224;256;300;360;448;560gand compute
the feature maps on the entire image for each scale.
We use 224224 as the view size for any scale,
so these views have different relative sizes on the
original image for different scales. We use 18 views
for each scale: one at the center, four at the corners,
and four on the middle of each side, with/without
flipping (when s= 224 there are 6 different views).
The combination of these 96 views reduces the top-5
error from 10.95% to 9.36%. Combining the two fullimage views (with flipping) further reduces the top-5
error to 9.14%. | 1406.4729 | Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition | Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size
(e.g., 224x224) input image. This requirement is "artificial" and may reduce
the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary
size/scale. In this work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy,
"spatial pyramid pooling", to eliminate the above requirement. The new network
structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation
regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid pooling is also robust to object
deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all
CNN-based image classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we
demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN architectures
despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101
datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-the-art classification results using a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net,
we compute the feature maps from the entire image only once, and then pool
features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length
representations for training the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly
computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102x faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable
accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our
methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification among all 38
teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this
competition. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.4729 | [
"Kaiming He",
"Xiangyu Zhang",
"Shaoqing Ren",
"Jian Sun"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | This manuscript is the accepted version for IEEE Transactions on
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (TPAMI) 2015. See Changelog | null | cs.CV | 20140618 | 20150423 | [] |
1406.4729 | 33 | error from 10.95% to 9.36%. Combining the two fullimage views (with flipping) further reduces the top-5
error to 9.14%.
In the Overfeat paper [5], the views are also extracted from the convolutional feature maps instead
of image crops. However, their views cannot have arbitrary sizes; rather, the windows are those where the
pooled features match the desired dimensionality. We
empirically find that these restricted windows are less
beneficial than our flexibly located/sized windows.
3.1.6 Summary and Results for ILSVRC 2014
In Table 4 we compare with previous state-of-theart methods. Krizhevsky et al .’s [3] is the winning
method in ILSVRC 2012; Overfeat [5], Howard’s [36],
and Zeiler and Fergus’s [4] are the leading methodsrank team top-5 test
1 GoogLeNet [32] 6.66
2 VGG [33] 7.32
3 ours 8.06
4 Howard 8.11
5 DeeperVision 9.50
6 NUS-BST 9.79
7 TTIC ECP 10.22 | 1406.4729 | Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition | Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size
(e.g., 224x224) input image. This requirement is "artificial" and may reduce
the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary
size/scale. In this work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy,
"spatial pyramid pooling", to eliminate the above requirement. The new network
structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation
regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid pooling is also robust to object
deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all
CNN-based image classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we
demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN architectures
despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101
datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-the-art classification results using a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net,
we compute the feature maps from the entire image only once, and then pool
features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length
representations for training the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly
computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102x faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable
accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our
methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification among all 38
teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this
competition. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.4729 | [
"Kaiming He",
"Xiangyu Zhang",
"Shaoqing Ren",
"Jian Sun"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | This manuscript is the accepted version for IEEE Transactions on
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (TPAMI) 2015. See Changelog | null | cs.CV | 20140618 | 20150423 | [] |
1406.4729 | 34 | 3 ours 8.06
4 Howard 8.11
5 DeeperVision 9.50
6 NUS-BST 9.79
7 TTIC ECP 10.22
Table 5: The competition results of ILSVRC 2014 classification [26]. The best entry of each team is listed.
in ILSVRC 2013. We only consider single-network
performance for manageable comparisons.
Our best single network achieves 9.14% top-5 error
on the validation set. This is exactly the single-model
entry we submitted to ILSVRC 2014 [26]. The top-5
error is 9.08% on the testing set (ILSVRC 2014 has
the same training/validation/testing data as ILSVRC
2012). After combining eleven models, our team’s result ( 8.06%) is ranked #3 among all 38 teams attending
ILSVRC 2014 (Table 5). Since the advantages of SPPnet should be in general independent of architectures,
we expect that it will further improve the deeper and
larger convolutional architectures [33], [32].
3.2 Experiments on VOC 2007 Classification
Our method can generate a full-view image representation. With the above networks pre-trained on
ImageNet, we extract these representations from the | 1406.4729 | Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition | Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size
(e.g., 224x224) input image. This requirement is "artificial" and may reduce
the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary
size/scale. In this work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy,
"spatial pyramid pooling", to eliminate the above requirement. The new network
structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation
regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid pooling is also robust to object
deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all
CNN-based image classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we
demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN architectures
despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101
datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-the-art classification results using a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net,
we compute the feature maps from the entire image only once, and then pool
features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length
representations for training the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly
computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102x faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable
accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our
methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification among all 38
teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this
competition. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.4729 | [
"Kaiming He",
"Xiangyu Zhang",
"Shaoqing Ren",
"Jian Sun"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | This manuscript is the accepted version for IEEE Transactions on
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (TPAMI) 2015. See Changelog | null | cs.CV | 20140618 | 20150423 | [] |
1406.4729 | 35 | Our method can generate a full-view image representation. With the above networks pre-trained on
ImageNet, we extract these representations from the
images in the target datasets and re-train SVM classifiers [38]. In the SVM training, we intentionally do
not use any data augmentation (flip/multi-view). We
l2-normalize the features for SVM training.
The classification task in Pascal VOC 2007 [22]
involves 9,963 images in 20 categories. 5,011 images
are for training, and the rest are for testing. The
performance is evaluated by mean Average Precision
(mAP). Table 6 summarizes the results.
8
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e)
model no SPP (ZF-5) SPP (ZF-5) SPP (ZF-5) SPP (ZF-5) SPP (Overfeat-7)
crop crop full full full
size 224224 224224 224- 392- 364conv 4 59.96 57.28 - - conv 5 66.34 65.43 - - pool 5=7(66) 69.14 68.76 70.82 71.67 76.09 | 1406.4729 | Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition | Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size
(e.g., 224x224) input image. This requirement is "artificial" and may reduce
the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary
size/scale. In this work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy,
"spatial pyramid pooling", to eliminate the above requirement. The new network
structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation
regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid pooling is also robust to object
deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all
CNN-based image classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we
demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN architectures
despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101
datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-the-art classification results using a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net,
we compute the feature maps from the entire image only once, and then pool
features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length
representations for training the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly
computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102x faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable
accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our
methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification among all 38
teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this
competition. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.4729 | [
"Kaiming He",
"Xiangyu Zhang",
"Shaoqing Ren",
"Jian Sun"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | This manuscript is the accepted version for IEEE Transactions on
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (TPAMI) 2015. See Changelog | null | cs.CV | 20140618 | 20150423 | [] |
1406.4729 | 36 | fc6=8 74.86 75.55 77.32 78.78 81.58
fc7=9 75.90 76.45 78.39 80.10 82.44
Table 6: Classification mAP in Pascal VOC 2007. For SPP-net, the pool 5=7layer uses the 66 pyramid level.
(a) (b) (c) (d)
model no SPP (ZF-5) SPP (ZF-5) SPP (ZF-5) SPP (Overfeat-7)
crop crop full full
size 224224 224224 224- 224conv 4 80.12 81.03 - conv 5 84.40 83.76 - pool 5=7(66) 87.98 87.60 89.46 91.46
SPP pool 5=7 - 89.47 91.44 93.42
fc6=8 87.86 88.54 89.50 91.83
fc7=9 85.30 86.10 87.08 90.00
Table 7: Classification accuracy in Caltech101. For SPP-net, the pool 5=7layer uses the 66 pyramid level.
We start from a baseline in Table 6 (a). The model is | 1406.4729 | Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition | Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size
(e.g., 224x224) input image. This requirement is "artificial" and may reduce
the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary
size/scale. In this work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy,
"spatial pyramid pooling", to eliminate the above requirement. The new network
structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation
regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid pooling is also robust to object
deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all
CNN-based image classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we
demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN architectures
despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101
datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-the-art classification results using a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net,
we compute the feature maps from the entire image only once, and then pool
features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length
representations for training the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly
computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102x faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable
accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our
methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification among all 38
teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this
competition. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.4729 | [
"Kaiming He",
"Xiangyu Zhang",
"Shaoqing Ren",
"Jian Sun"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | This manuscript is the accepted version for IEEE Transactions on
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (TPAMI) 2015. See Changelog | null | cs.CV | 20140618 | 20150423 | [] |
1406.4729 | 37 | We start from a baseline in Table 6 (a). The model is
ZF-5 without SPP . To apply this model, we resize the
image so that its smaller dimension is 224, and crop
the center 224224 region. The SVM is trained via
the features of a layer. On this dataset, the deeper the
layer is, the better the result is. In Table 6 (b), we replace the no-SPP net with our SPP-net. As a first-step
comparison, we still apply the SPP-net on the center
224224 crop. The results of the fc layers improve.
This gain is mainly due to multi-level pooling.
Table 6 (c) shows our results on full images, where
the images are resized so that the shorter side is 224.
We find that the results are considerably improved
(78.39% vs. 76.45%). This is due to the full-image
representation that maintains the complete content.
Because the usage of our network does not depend
on scale, we resize the images so that the smaller
dimension is sand use the same network to extract
features. We find that s= 392 gives the best results
(Table 6 (d)) based on the validation set. This is mainly
because the objects occupy smaller regions in VOC | 1406.4729 | Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition | Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size
(e.g., 224x224) input image. This requirement is "artificial" and may reduce
the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary
size/scale. In this work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy,
"spatial pyramid pooling", to eliminate the above requirement. The new network
structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation
regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid pooling is also robust to object
deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all
CNN-based image classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we
demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN architectures
despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101
datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-the-art classification results using a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net,
we compute the feature maps from the entire image only once, and then pool
features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length
representations for training the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly
computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102x faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable
accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our
methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification among all 38
teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this
competition. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.4729 | [
"Kaiming He",
"Xiangyu Zhang",
"Shaoqing Ren",
"Jian Sun"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | This manuscript is the accepted version for IEEE Transactions on
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (TPAMI) 2015. See Changelog | null | cs.CV | 20140618 | 20150423 | [] |
1406.4729 | 38 | (Table 6 (d)) based on the validation set. This is mainly
because the objects occupy smaller regions in VOC
2007 but larger regions in ImageNet, so the relative
object scales are different between the two sets. These
results indicate scale matters in the classification tasks,
and SPP-net can partially address this “scale mismatch” issue.
In Table 6 (e) the network architecture is replaced
with our best model (Overfeat-7, multi-size trained),
and the mAP increases to 82.44% . Table 8 summarizes
our results and the comparisons with the state-of-theart methods. Among these methods, VQ [15], LCC
[18], and FK [19] are all based on spatial pyramids
matching, and [13], [4], [34], [6] are based on deepnetworks. In these results, Oquab et al.’s (77.7%) and
Chatfield et al .’s (82.42%) are obtained by network
fine-tuning and multi-view testing. Our result is comparable with the state of the art, using only a single
full-image representation and without fine-tuning.
3.3 Experiments on Caltech101 | 1406.4729 | Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition | Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size
(e.g., 224x224) input image. This requirement is "artificial" and may reduce
the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary
size/scale. In this work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy,
"spatial pyramid pooling", to eliminate the above requirement. The new network
structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation
regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid pooling is also robust to object
deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all
CNN-based image classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we
demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN architectures
despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101
datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-the-art classification results using a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net,
we compute the feature maps from the entire image only once, and then pool
features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length
representations for training the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly
computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102x faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable
accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our
methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification among all 38
teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this
competition. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.4729 | [
"Kaiming He",
"Xiangyu Zhang",
"Shaoqing Ren",
"Jian Sun"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | This manuscript is the accepted version for IEEE Transactions on
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (TPAMI) 2015. See Changelog | null | cs.CV | 20140618 | 20150423 | [] |
1406.4729 | 39 | full-image representation and without fine-tuning.
3.3 Experiments on Caltech101
The Caltech101 dataset [21] contains 9,144 images in
102 categories (one background). We randomly sample 30 images per category for training and up to 50
images per category for testing. We repeat 10 random
splits and average the accuracy. Table 7 summarizes
our results.
There are some common observations in the Pascal
VOC 2007 and Caltech101 results: SPP-net is better
than the no-SPP net (Table 7 (b) vs. (a)), and the fullview representation is better than the crop ((c) vs. (b)).
But the results in Caltech101 have some differences
with Pascal VOC. The fully-connected layers are less
accurate, and the SPP layers are better. This is possibly
because the object categories in Caltech101 are less
related to those in ImageNet, and the deeper layers
are more category-specialized. Further, we find that
the scale 224 has the best performance among the
scales we tested on this dataset. This is mainly because
the objects in Caltech101 also occupy large regions of
the images, as is the case of ImageNet.
Besides cropping, we also evaluate warping the
image to fit the 224 224 size. This solution maintains | 1406.4729 | Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition | Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size
(e.g., 224x224) input image. This requirement is "artificial" and may reduce
the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary
size/scale. In this work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy,
"spatial pyramid pooling", to eliminate the above requirement. The new network
structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation
regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid pooling is also robust to object
deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all
CNN-based image classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we
demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN architectures
despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101
datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-the-art classification results using a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net,
we compute the feature maps from the entire image only once, and then pool
features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length
representations for training the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly
computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102x faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable
accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our
methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification among all 38
teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this
competition. | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.4729 | [
"Kaiming He",
"Xiangyu Zhang",
"Shaoqing Ren",
"Jian Sun"
] | [
"cs.CV"
] | This manuscript is the accepted version for IEEE Transactions on
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (TPAMI) 2015. See Changelog | null | cs.CV | 20140618 | 20150423 | [] |