Q:

Preserve unbounded sets between different cofinality

Working in ZFC, let $\kappa,λ$ be cardinals with $\kappa>λ$, and assume that $\kappa$ is regular. 
We say that a function $F:\kappa^n→λ$, for some finite $n$, is preserving unbound, if for all $a⊆\kappa$ unbounded, we have that the closure of $F[a^n]$ under $F$ is unbounded in $λ$.
Is there always preserving unbound function? 
For $\mbox{cof}(λ)=ω$ this is easy: take $n=1$ and map every element from $\kappa\setminusλ$ into some some element of $λ$, and map an element from $λ$ to somewhere greater using some fixed cofinal sequence of $λ$, i.e. fix some cofinal $(λ_i\mid i\in\omega)$, and for $k$ be the minimal $k$ such that $x∈λ_k$, map $x$ to some element of $\lambda_{k+1}\setminusλ_k$.
The problem arise when $\mbox{cof}(λ)>ω$. In this case we cannot "climb" a cofinal. 
In this case for $n=1$ there are clearly no preserving unbound function.  Indeed if $F:\kappa→λ$ be any function, then there exists some $x∈λ$ such that $F^{-1}(x)$ is unbounded in $\kappa$.
A special case is that $λ$ is regular, in this case preserving unbound becomes:

A function $F:\kappa^n→λ$, for some finite $n$, such that if for all $a⊆\kappa$ unbounded, we have $F[a^n]$ is unbounded in $λ$.

Indeed if $F[a^n]$ is bound, then $|F[a^n]|<λ$, then $|\bigcup\{F[a^n],F[F[a^n]],...\}|<λ$, so the closure is also bounded. 
The I am most interested in the special cases where $λ$ is indeed regular and that $\kappa=λ^+$, in particular $\kappa=ω_{k+1},λ=ω_k$ for finite $k$

A:

In the case that $\kappa=\lambda^+$, I claim that $n=2$ suffices to produce such a function, as follows.  Fix, for each ordinal $\beta<\kappa$ a one-to-one function $f_\beta:\beta\to\lambda$. Then define $F:\kappa^2\to\lambda$ by setting $F(\alpha,\beta)=f_\beta(\alpha)$ if $\alpha<\beta$. (It doesn't matter how you define $F(\alpha,\beta)$ for $\alpha\geq\beta$.) Now consider any unbounded $A\subseteq\kappa$; I want to show that $F(A^2)$ is unbounded in $\lambda$, for which it suffices to show that $F(A^2)$ has cardinality $\lambda$. Since $A$ is unbounded in $\kappa$, it has a $\lambda$-th element $\beta$. As $\alpha$ ranges over the $\lambda$ members of $A$ that are $<\beta$, $F(\alpha,\beta)=f_\beta(\alpha)$ takes $\lambda$ distinct values, because $f_\beta$ is one-to-one.  And all of these $\lambda$ values are in $F(A^2)$ because $\beta$ and all the $\alpha$'s under consideration are in $A$. 
I'm reasonably sure a similar argument (iterating this idea) will show that $n=q+1$ suffices when $\kappa$ is the $q$-fold successor of $\lambda$. Unfortunately, I don't have time right now to write down the argument.