Alleged Russian bots have been at the forefront of another week of Russophobia, with a new but familiar pattern emerging.  Scare stories and accusations are made, before a later admission that no actual evidence is available. 

Read more

RT takes a look at the last seven days or so of Russophobia. 

Democrats’ security chief missed the memo

One of the real values of Russophobia is that it means thought and proof are rarely, if ever, needed anymore.  Why find out what really happened when there is a decent conclusion to jump to? 

For example, this week Bob Lord, the Democratic National Committee’s chief security officer, claimed that the organization’s US voter database had been hacked.  Only, he later had to admit it was actually a ‘phishing test.’ 

Yep, nobody told the security chief about the security test, and he didn’t bother asking either, because it’s much easier to simply insinuate that Russians did it.  To be fair to Lord, he didn’t appear to overtly use the ‘R’ word, but almost every media report on the non-incident seasoned its coverage liberally with accusations against Russia. 

Microsoft’s marketing dept jumps on Russophobia bandwagon

Staying in the murky world of unsubstantiated cyber-claims, Microsoft said it has also thwarted phishing attacks on political targets by a group “widely associated” with Russia (Fancy Bear, in case you’re interested).  It backed up its claims in the now-time-honored fashion of admitting there is “no evidence” that the dodgy domains detected were used in any successful attacks — and there’s no evidence “to indicate the identity of the ultimate targets.” 

Read more

So, why is Microsoft getting involved?  Because it’s got a brand new product maybe?  Bill Gates’ boys have come up with anti-hacking software ‘AccountGuard’ as part of its ‘Defending Democracy Program.’ 

It provides “state-of-the-art cybersecurity protection at no extra cost to all candidates and campaign offices at the federal, state and local level, as well as think tanks and political organizations we now believe are under attack.” 

And they claim the Russians are dangerous!? 

Pro-pox bots

Those busy little alleged Russian bots are also driving the online anti-vaccine debate in the US, apparently, according to research in the US.  No surprise there really, Russian bots real or imagined are accused of driving every online debate these days. 

David Broniatowski from the George Washington School of Engineering and Applied Science said: “... many anti-vaccine tweets come from accounts whose provenance is unclear.  These might be bots, human users or ‘cyborgs’ – hacked accounts that are sometimes taken over by bots.  Although it’s impossible to know exactly how many tweets were generated by bots and trolls ...”

Read more

“Impossible to know,” “provenance unclear.”  So again, no real evidence, so it must be the Russians, mustn’t it? 

Someone better check whether Jenny McCarthy and Jim Carrey are Russian bots too, because they’re not too keen on vaccinations either.  Apparently neither is Donald Trump, but you can hardly accuse him of… Oh. 

Manafort: Conviction without collusion

Russophobes were jumping for joy at the conviction of Trump’s former election chief Paul Manafort this week.  He was sent down for tax fraud, and bank fraud, and hiding bank accounts.  What he definitely wasn’t sent down for was colluding with Russia, which is really a little strange considering the man responsible for sending him to court was Special Counsel Robert Mueller, who was only appointed to investigate exactly that.  As we’ve seen, though, evidence is optional when Russians are the target. 

In the wise words of America’s commander-in-chief: “This has nothing to do with Russian collusion.  This started as Russian collusion.  This has absolutely nothing to do [with it].”  Say what you want about Donald Trump…

Think your friends would be interested?  Share this story! 

to RT newsletter to get stories the mainstream media won’t tell you.