Q:

Edit rejected twice as minor edits

Twice today my edits have been rejected by minitech.  

https://stackoverflow.com/review/suggested-edits/2978871
https://stackoverflow.com/review/suggested-edits/2978811

The chosen reason was

This edit is too minor; suggested edits should be substantive improvements addressing multiple issues in the post. 

After which he made the same edits on the post with little difference. 
Are these edits I made really minor?  And if so, what was I wrong to have edited it? 

A:

Both times, you formatted code, and left enormous, inconsistent leading indentation, as well as introducing a

Can anyone pls help me. 

in the second.  Too minor. 

A:

People with enough rep to just edit themselves are welcome to make tiny edits if they feel like it.  On the other hand, people without enough rep to just edit are not supposed to clog the edit queue with tiny edits.  Aside from the points about substance raised in the comments, there's nothing very wrong with the pattern in which someone rejects an edit as 'too small' and then turns around and makes the same change themselves as part of an edit.  They aren't consuming reviewer attention.