       In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                             OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                           No.  10-442V
                                    Filed: December 13, 2013

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *                           UNPUBLISHED
JEFFREY ALBERT DEMCHUK,                       *
                                              *           Special Master Dorsey
              Petitioner,                     *
                                              *           Joint Stipulation on Damages;
v.                                            *           Trivalent Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;
                                              *           Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS);
SECRETARY OF HEALTH                           *           Chronic Inflammatory
AND HUMAN SERVICES,                           *           Demyclinating
                                              *           Polyneuropathy (CIDP)
              Respondent.                      *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Diana Stadelnikas Sedar, Maglio Christopher & Toale, PA, Sarasota, FL, for petitioner. 
Lisa Watts, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. 

                                            DECISION1

        On July 8, 2010, Jeffrey Albert Demchuk (petitioner), filed a petition pursuant to the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.2 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006). 
Petitioner alleged that he sustained the first symptom or manifestation of Guillain-Barré
Syndrome (“GBS”) and/or Chronic Inflammatory Demyclinating Polyneuropathy (“CIDP”) as a
result of his receipt of a trivalent influenza (“flu”) vaccine, which he received on or about
September 26, 2009.  Petitioner alleges that he experienced the residual effects of this injury for
more than six months. 

1
  Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the undersigned’s action in this case,
the undersigned intends to post this ruling on the website of the United States Court of Federal
Claims, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub.  L. No.  107-347, § 205, 116
Stat.  2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)).  As provided by
Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within which to request redaction “of any
information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in
substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.”  Vaccine Rule
18(b). 
2
  The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National
Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub.  L. No.  99-660, 100 Stat.  3755, codified as amended,
42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006) (Vaccine Act or the Act).  All citations in this decision to
individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa. 


                                                  1
       On December 12, 2013, the parties filed a stipulation, stating that a decision should be
entered awarding compensation. 

        Respondent denies that the flu vaccine caused petitioner’s alleged GBS, CIDP, or any
other injuries and further denies that petitioner’s current disabilities are sequelae of a vaccine-
related injury.  Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto as
Appendix A. The undersigned finds the stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of
the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein. 

       The parties stipulated that petitioner shall receive the following compensation:

       A lump sum of $217,000.00, in the form of a check payable to petitioner.  This
       amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C.
       § 300aa-15(a). 

       Stipulation ¶ 8. 

       The undersigned approves the requested amount for petitioner’s compensation. 
Accordingly, an award should be made consistent with the stipulation. 

         In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of
the court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’
stipulation.3

       IT IS SO ORDERED. 

                                               s/ Nora Beth Dorsey
                                               Nora Beth Dorsey
                                               Special Master




3
 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of
notice renouncing the right to seek review. 


                                                  2
