Anis
Shorrosh
a Palestinian Christian missionary had two debates with Sheikh Ahmed Deedat on the topics
“Is Jesus God” and “Quran and Bible- which is
God’s word?”  in 1985 and 1988
respectively.  He claims to have won the second debate on the topic
“Quran and
Bible – which is God’s word?” 

In
many of the debates, the
victorious person is extremely obvious e.g., Swaggart
vs. Dedaat debate, its
very obvious that Sheikh Ahmed
Deedat won the debate,
Jimmy Swaggart
did not have anything to prove that Bible is God’s word and
neither did he
reply to the points of Ahmed Deedat. 
In Dr.ZakirNaik vs. Dr.William
Campbell, it was obvious that Dr.Zakir
won the debate and proved that Quran
is compatible with science and Bible is not.  In Shamoun
vs. SamiZaatari’s debate,
it was sound victory by brother Sami
over Shamoun.  The
results of these debates are obvious. 

But
it was a bit
different in ShorroshvsDeedat’s
second debate.  The reason is becauseShorrosh tried to be
cunning, but after all truth
always prevails.  Shorrosh
shot himself into the foot
when he let Deedat
speak first for 75 minutes (Which
is unusual for a debate, its
usually 40-60 minutes). 
That further proves that Shorrosh
was the loser and
Sheikh Deedat won the
debate.  Here I’ll
be exposing the lying missionary Anis Shorrosh. 
He
claims

“Again
in August
1988, at the NationalExhibitionCenter,
Birmingham,
England,
he debated victoriously, for five hours, the same Muslim leader with
over
11,000 in attendance!  The
topic was:
“The Quran or
the
Bible: Which is God’s
Word?” “ 

Now
what do you call victory
in a debate?  Just because you throw more than 100 red herrings, does it
prove
that you are victorious?  Definitely
not! 

The
debate started and Sheikh
Ahmed Deedat spoke
first, he gave many points to
prove that Bible is NOT the word of God.  She showed amazing fables from
the
Bible, showed contradictions etc.  in his 75 minutes.  Then Shorrosh
came to speak for his 75 minutes, he did not touch any point by Sheikh Deedat.  See, he had 75 long
minutes and since he was
speaking second, he was obliged
to reply to the point
by Sheikh Deedat, but
he NEVER did it.  He infact
was reading from the papers at a speed of 100
miles/hour and it was impossible to catch and note down the points that
he was
raising. 

Now
did he win the debate? 

He
in his 75 minutes did not
touch any point raised by Ahmed Deedat. 
He had said
in his last debate in 1985 against Deedat
that 75% of
the Quranis copied from the
Bible and Deedat quoted
him in his talk.  When he came
to speak, he could not show one example in 75 minutes out of the
“75%”. 
The Arabic Bible was available to him as well as the
Arabic Quran. 
Furthermore, Deedat
replied to some of his points in his 15 minutes rebuttal and reminded
of him to
show what is copied from
the Bible in the Quran. 
Shorrosh when he had his
rebuttal again failed to show anything. 

Deedat showed fables from the Bible.  Like

“After EhudcameShamgar son of Anath, who
struck down six hundred Philistines
with an oxgoad. 
He too saved Israel.” 
(Judges 3:31)

In
reply to such fables from
the Bible he said that
“Masudi”
a Muslim scholar said in his book that Hazrat
Ali
killed 500 people in a day with his hands. 

Now
what are we gonna
do with it?  The debate was
on the Quran and the
Bible not about Masudi
or any Christian scholar.  Does the Quran
say that Hazrat Ali
killed
500 people with his hands?  These were
the replies that he was
giving. 

He
said that his “research”
on Quran, which he was going to present, would shake the faith of
Muslims, I
thought perhaps he has something to prove his point, but all he was
doing is
using dumb logic and saying utter nonsense.  Why do I say so?  Well I’ll tell you. 

Shorrosh’s logic:

He was simply
assuming Bible to be the word of God.  If suppose there are two
statements,
which differ in the Quran
and the Bible.  A Muslim
would accept what the Quran
says and a Christian
would accept what the Bible says.  It’s
a fair deal,
since both of them believe their Holy book to be authentic, but can you
use
this argument in a debate?  Just because the statement differs, does it
prove
that Bible is right and the Quran
is wrong?  Shorrosh was
using this dumb logic in a debate.  Only a
missionary can think of such a logic! 
He was like well the
Bible says this and the Quran
differs, so Bible is True and Quran
is not.  Bible
says this and Quran
says that, so Bible is right and Quran
is wrong.  This was the level of intelligence of this
lying missionary. 

Hilarious
points by Shorrosh to
attack the credibility of the Quran. 

1.Quran is not for the whole of human kind
because Muslims
did not translate it until 1415. 

2.He used point on
women in Islam to discredit the Quran. 
This is
altogether another topic, and the points
which he raised
can all be used against him in a much worse manner, since I am not
writing a
rebuttal to his talk, therefore, I won’t be dealing with them
right now.  But do topics
on women in Islam discredit the Quran
from being God’s word?  What type of a dumb logic is this. 

3.Then he went on
to say well Muslims do this and that.  What has it to do with the Quran?  Was the debate on the
Muslim’s behavior or the Quran? 

4.Then he went on
to say that Muslims did this in history, they did that.  Khalid
Bin Waleen (RA) did
this and did that.  What has it do
with the Quran? 

5.Then from his “research” he told us
the sources of the Quran. 
He was like well Muhammad (pbuh)
copied from
Nestorian Christians, he copied from this and he copied from that.  Now
is the
argument to discredit the Quran? 
Do you call it sound
evidence?  He was simply alleging that Muhammad (pbuh)
copied from this person and that person to “prove”
his point that Quran is
not from God.  This was his dumb logic. 

These
were the sort of
arguments that he used, and the speed was no less than 100 miles/hour. 
The
audience immediately thought that this guy
was a joke
and they all started laughing at him. 

Anis
Shorrosh
is nothing but a lying Missionary who falsely claims to have won the
debate
against Deedat.  Sheikh Deedat
replied to many points in his two rebuttals
, 15
minutes each.  But Shorroshdin’t
reply to anything in his 75 minutes nor in his rebuttal of 15 minutes
and he
also failed the challenge of Sheikh Deedat
when he
asked him to show that 75% of the Quran
is copied
from the Bible as Shorrosh
had stated. 

From
the above reasons, we
can conclude that the winner of the debate was undoubtedly Sheikh Ahmed
Deedat and not Anis Shorrosh.