file
stringlengths 12
52
| Message_ID
stringlengths 39
43
| Date
stringlengths 36
37
| Sender
stringlengths 10
59
| Receiver
stringlengths 0
6.58k
| MESSAGE
stringlengths 3
2.01M
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
farmer-d/logistics/1358. | 14739630.1075854137147.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Wed, 23 Aug 2000 07:41:00 -0700 (PDT) | michael.walters@enron.com | pat.clynes@enron.com, daren.farmer@enron.com | 3rd Party Expense Contracts Mick
3-4783 |
kaminski-v/sent_items/2668. | 30886871.1075863442776.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Thu, 30 Aug 2001 08:15:48 -0700 (PDT) | j.kaminski@enron.com | j.kaminski@enron.com | http://www.eei.org/ |
jones-t/all_documents/1812. | 21280613.1075846954172.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Fri, 19 May 2000 09:16:00 -0700 (PDT) | molly.harris@enron.com | tana.jones@enron.com | Re: Hallwood Energy Corporation Thanks - will follow up on process!
Regards
Molly
From: Tana Jones on 05/19/2000 09:12 AM
To: Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Hallwood Energy Corporation
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 05/19/2000 09:12 AM -----
John Suttle
05/17/2000 04:36 PM
To: Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Hallwood Energy Corporation
EOL Team,
Please approve the above mentioned for online trading for financial oil and
gas in the U.S. only.
We have a Master Swap contract with these guys, and they are an ESP.
However, their exposure is well above the contractual threshold ($6.5MM
credit line versus $12MM exposure) and we are not collateralized for the
amount of exposure above the credit line. So, as a result, we want to
approve them for online trading, but we actually do not want them to be able
to complete any transactions. The counterparty has requested approval, and
Fred Lagrasta has asked that we approve them so they can get online and see
the stacks. Credit does not want them to complete trades, so we need to set
a very low credit line for online trading so when the counterparty attempts
to trade (if they attempt to trade), is turned down.
If this is not possible, please ket me know so I can get back with Fred and
the counterparty.
Thanks,
John |
fossum-d/sent/491. | 15746201.1075842503994.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Fri, 8 Sep 2000 06:09:00 -0700 (PDT) | drew.fossum@enron.com | kevin.hyatt@enron.com | Re: Customer Outings Great--Texans know the difference between a dog and a bird. Still unclear
whether they recognize the distinction between a hen and a hun!!! (Read
John's email more carefully!) Of course, at Pheasant Haven you can shoot
both (and probably the dogs too) so the difference doesn't matter. Kevin,
I've been thinking about your original reqeust and may need to exercise the
Legal Dept. veto. These customers of yours are the same ones that can't
drive a jet ski without paramedics around, right? And now you want them
wandering around Nebraska heavily armed??? What the hell are you thinking?
DF
Kevin Hyatt
09/08/2000 12:32 PM
To: John Dushinske/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Customer Outings
Tell you what, just to make sure I can tell the difference between the lab
and the Hen, I'll bring my own Lab! Besides, when I hunted there last, we
couldn't shoot hens.
PS-- I have my personal duck lease down here that we can also make
available. There are overnight quarters if we need them. (Last year we took
over 600 ducks off the properties).
KH
John Dushinske
09/07/2000 03:03 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc: Rosemary Gracey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Customer Outings
Drew - Depends if they can recognize the difference between a Lab and a Hun.
We just received the renewal notice for 2000/01. I recommended to Dave N.
that we renew the membership.
I will ask Rosemary to give both of you notice when she gets the approval
from Dave.
Once approved we would be happy to help set up outings.
Thanks. John |
dean-c/info/203. | 12807034.1075857353214.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Mon, 2 Oct 2000 05:05:00 -0700 (PDT) | truorange@aol.com | truorange@aol.com | True Orange, Oct. 2, 2000, Part 2 Part 2
Scouting Oklahoma
Texas and Oklahoma, both ranked in the top 15 for the first time since 1984=
,
meet at 11 a.m. Saturday in the Cotton Bowl in Dallas to battle for the
leadership in the Big 12's Southern Division.
The Sooners are 4-0 and ranked No. 10 in the Associated Press poll. The
Longhorns are 3-1 and are No. 11 in the AP voting.
OU has six offensive and seven defensive starters back from last year's 7-=
5
team.
Oklahoma opened the season with a 55-14 rout of Texas-El Paso, then wallope=
d
Arkansas State, 45-7, hammered Rice, 42-14, and opened Big 12 play Saturday
with a 34-16 win over Kansas
Texas leads the all-time series 55-34-5 and has a three-year winning streak=
.
In fact, Texas dominated Oklahoma in the 1990s, going 7-2-1.
But coach Bob Stoops, in his second year as the Sooners' head man, has OU
humming along with an undefeated record and big ambitions.
Behind his all-out passing attack, the Sooners jumped out to a quick 17-0
lead over the Longhorns last season before UT defense coordinator Carl Rees=
e
changed his blitz packages and started getting enough pressure on QB Josh
Heupel to put the brakes on the OU offense and allow Texas to rally for a
38-28 win.
But it will be tougher this year because the Sooners of 1999 had no running
threat at all. They are rushing the ball much better this season, which kee=
ps
some of the pressure of Heupel.
The Longhorn defense should be able to pressure Heupel and corral the Soone=
r
backs if the Texas offense shows up early.
The Longhorn offense hasn't done much in the first quarter of any of its
games this year. One field goal and very little yardage is all UT has
garnered offensively this season.
But QB Major Applewhite, who killed the Sooners last year with his clutch
throws, seems to be regaining his magic touch after off-season knee surgery=
,
and sophomore RB Kenny Hayter had his coming-out party Saturday.
They keys to a Longhorn victory: (1) get a quick start on both sides of the
ball, (2) pressure Heupel and make him throw before he wants to, (3) a
reasonably balanced offensive attack, (4) no punt blocks, and (5) win the
turnover and time-of-possession battles.
Here's how the teams compare statistically (national rank in parenthesis):
Texas Oklahoma
Offense
(86) 100.2 Rushing Avg. (53) 154.2
(6) 321.3 Passing Avg. (5) 325.3
(26) 421.5 Total Off. Avg. (6) 479.5
(8) 41.5 Scoring Avg (5) 44.0
Defense
(11) 77.3 Rushing Avg. (39) 118.3
(32) 181.0 Passing Avg. (51) 197.7
(132) 258.2 Total Def. Avg. (30) 314.0
(10) 11.0 Opp. Scoring Avg (15) 12.8
Big 12 Roundup
The big Texas-Oklahoma clash in Dallas is the headliner for the second week
of Big 12 play. It features the two pre-season favorites in the South and
also pits two nationally ranked teams.
Nebraska visits Iowa State in a battle of unbeatens in the North, but the
Huskers should romp.
The potential upset of the week features winless Colorado at Texas A&M. The
Buffaloes are winless, but they have played four very tough foes in a row.
They are a dangerous team, at their place or yours.
BIG 12 STANDINGS
SOUTHERN DIVISION
Conference Season
W L PF PA Pct. W L PF PA Pct.
Oklahoma 1 0 34 16 1.000 4 0 176 51 1.0=
00
Texas 1 0 42 7 1.000 3 1 166 44
.750
Texas A&M 1 0 33 15 1.000 3 1 139 59 .=
750
Texas Tech 0 1 15 33 .000 4 1 116 59 .80=
0
Baylor 0 1 17 31 .000 2 2 74 85
.500
Okla State 0 1 7 42 .000 2 2 72 96
.500
NORTHERN DIVISION
Conference Season
W L PF PA Pct. W L PF PA
Pct.
Kansas State 1 0 44 21 1.000 5 0 256 48 1.0=
00
Nebraska 1 0 42 24 1.000 4 0 160 74 1.000
Iowa State 1 0 31 17 1.000 4 0 127 68 1.00=
0
Kansas 0 1 16 34 .000 2 2 98 85
.500
Missouri 0 1 24 42 .000 1 3 93 137 .25=
0
Colorado 0 1 21 44 .000 0 4 73 106 .=
000
Last Week's Results
Texas 42, Oklahoma State 7
Texas A&M 33, Texas Tech 15
Oklahoma 34, Kansas 16
Iowa State 31, Baylor 17
Nebraska 42, Missouri 24
Kansas State 44, Colorado 21
This Week's Games
Texas vs. Oklahoma (Dallas) 11 a.m. (ABC)
Colorado at Texas A&M 1 p.m.
Oklahoma State at Missouri, 1 p.m.
Kansas State at Kansas 1 p.m.
Nebraska at Iowa State, 2:30 p.m. (ABC)
Baylor at Texas Tech 6 p.m.
2000 Longhorn Schedule, Record (3-1)
Texas Opp.
Sept. 9 Louisiana-Lafayette 52 10
Sept 16 at Stanford 24 27
Sept 23 Houston 48 0
Sept 30 Oklahoma State 42 7
Oct. 7 Oklahoma (Dallas)
Oct. 14 at Colorado
Oct. 21 Missouri
Oct. 28 Baylor
Nov. 4 at Texas Tech
Nov. 11 at Kansas
Nov. 24 Texas A&M
Scoring by Quarters
Texas 12 55 47 52 - 166
Opponents 16 14 7 7 - 44
The Blue Chips
Here's my updated list of the top Texas football recruits. I used * * * * a=
s
a dividing line at each position between the Fabulous 40 and the remainder =
of
the Elite 80.
Now that I have weekly newsletters, I'll have my updated Elite 80 in at lea=
st
one issue per month.
The Elite 80 Recruits
Quarterback (6)
Matt Nordgren, 6-5, 225, 4.7, Dallas Bishop Lynch (UT, LSU, Colo, Ky, Fla)
Jason Carter, 5-11, 180, 4.5, Caldwell (A&M Commitment)
* * * *
Mike Pankratz, 6-3, 200, 4.8, Katy Taylor (A&M, UCLA, OU, KSU, ND)
Davon Vinson, 6-3, 185, 4.5, Kilgore (A&M, Ark, OU, Bay)
Tye Gunn, 6-4, 200, 4.62, La Grange (TCU Commitment)
Kevin Ford, 6-0, 188, 4.5, Madisonville (Rice Commitment)
Running Back (8)
Cedric Benson, 5-11, 200, 4.5, Midland Lee (UT Commitment)
David Underwood, 6-0, 220, 4.38, Madisonville (Michigan Commitment)
Anthony Johnson, 5-11, 195, 4.4, Jefferson (UT Commitment)
Donta Hickson, 5-9, 180, 4.4, McKinney (FSU, Neb, A&M, OU, Mich, Tenn, TT)
* * * *
Eron Haynes, 6-1, 195, 4.4, Borger (TT, A&M, ASU, Kan, Wash)
David Williams, 5-11, 180, 4.4, Carrollton Smith (FSU, A&M, Colo, OU, Mia)
Anthony Evans, 5-9, 195, 4.5, Pearland (Bay, A&M, Az, KSU, UCLA)
Cody Thibodeaux, 6-1, 200, 4.5, Winnie East Chambers (A&M, Neb, Ok St, LSU)
Fullback (2)
Darnell Sims, 6-2, 230, 4.7, Aldine (A&M, UH, LSU)
* * * *
Mark Pierce, 6-2, 215, 4.6, Weatherford (TCU Commitment)
Tight End (1)
James Moses, 6-3, 225, 4.7, GP North Shore (UT, A&M, Az, Mich, Colo)
* * * *
Wide Receiver (10)
Armon Dorrough, 6-1, 168, 4.4, Lancaster (ND, UT, Tenn)
Brandon Jones, 6-3, 205, 4.4, Texark. Liberty-Eylau (Ky, Ark, A&M, FSU, UT)
Bennie Brazell, 6-2, 168, 4.4, Houston Westbury (LSU, UCLA, Ark, Ky, LSU, M=
ia)
Thomson Omboga, 6-2, 175, 4.5, Grand Prairie (UT, OU, ND, Ga, A&M, Mo)
Cedric Williams, 6-0, 170, 4.4, Jefferson (KSU, FSU, LSU, Neb, A&M, OU)
Keith Mills, 5-11, 175, 4.4, Garland (A&M, FSU, Fla, Ark, TT, OU)
* * * *
Terrence Thomas, 5-9, 175, 4.4, Houston Washington (Mia, FSU, UCLa, A&M, UH=
)
Corey Roberts, 6-4, 190, 4.4, Carthage (LSU, A&M, SMU, TCU, UT)
Jesse Woods, 6-4, 190, 4.5, Katy Taylor (A&M Commitment)
Kenneth Shelton, 6-1, 175, 4.4, Port Arthur Jefferson (A&M, OU, TT, UT)
Offensive Line (13)
Jonathan Scott, 6-7, 290, 4.9, Dallas Carter (UT Commitment)
Jami Hightower, 6-4, 305, 5.2, Jacksonville (Neb, UT, A&M)
Ben Wilkerson, 6-4, 265, 4.9, Hemphill (A&M, Mich, ND, Neb, Ark, LSU, OU)
Abe Robinson, 6-6, 270, 4.9, Jersey Village (UT Commitment)
William Winston, 6-6, 330, 5.3, Houston Madison (A&M, UT, UCLA, LSU, Mia)
Mike Garcia, 6-5, 280, 5.2, Galena Park (UT Commitment)
* * * *
Will Allen, 6-5, 300, 5.2, Cypress Falls (UT Commitment)
Terrance Young, 6-6, 330, 5.5, Longview (UT Commitment)
Bryan Kegans, 6-6, 305, 5.2, Stephenville (Texas Tech Commitment
Shane Simms, 6-2, 300, 4.9, Tomball (TCU Commitment)
Roman Reeves, 6-6, 295, 5.2, Livingston (UT Commitment)
E. J. Whitley, 6-5, 290, 5.3, Texas City (Kentucky Commitment)
Clint O'Neal, 6-6, 290, 5.2, Weatherford (Colorado Commitment)
Defensive End (8)
Kevin Everett, 6-5, 235, 4.6, Port Arthur Jefferson (UT, ND, Colo, Pur, Mia=
)
Simeon Jones, 6-3, 240, 4.7, Houston Jones (A&M, UH, Colo, UT, Bay)
Lawrence Hooper, 6-4, 255, 4.7, Aldine (A&M, PSU, LSU, Colo, Fla, OSU, UCLA=
)
* * * *
Jamie Jackson, 6-3, 225, 4.7 Andrews (TT, OU, A&M, UT)
McKenzie Tilmon, 6-3, 235, 4.7, Irving MacArthur (KSU, UT, A&M, Tenn)
Colin Allred, 6-3, 225, 4.7, Dallas Hillcrest (UT, Neb, TT, TCU, Mich)
Bret Rayl, 6-7, 265, 4.9, Lewisville (A&M, FSU, OU, PSU, TCU)
Quintene Newhouse, 6-2, 250, 4.7, Emory Rains (A&M, Ky, Mich, UT, Bay, TCU)
Defensive Tackle (7)
Tommie Harris, 6-3, 280, 4.8, Killeen Ellison (UT, FSU, A&M, Mia, Neb, LSU)
Thomas Derricks, 6-0, 275, 4.9, Dallas Jesuit (PSU, ND, Neb, A&M, TCU)
Fred Thwreat, 6-2, 300, 4.9, Midland Lee (A&M, UT, TT, Az)
* * * *
Clayton Harmon, 6-6, 260, 5.1, Stephenville (Texas Tech Commitment)
Sharod McGowan, 6-2, 250, 4.7, Waco (A&M, UT, TT, NC, OU, NC)
Brandon Goodlett, 6-2, 280, 5.1, Conroe (Ky, OU, Neb, UT)
Jeremy Calahan, 6-3, 260, 5.0, Pflugerville (UT, ND, A&M, OSU, Stan, TCU, V=
an)
Outside Linebacker (6)
Derrick Johnson, 6-3, 205, 4.5, Waco (UT, FSU, A&M, Ark, OU)
Jonathon Jackson, 6-3, 225, 4.56, GP North Shore (UT, A&M, Mia, Colo, PSU)
Lance McFarland, 6-1, 225, 4.6, Jefferson (UT Commitment)
* * * *
Lee Foliaki, 6-2, 200, 4.5, Euless Trinity (A&M, UT, FSU, Neb, KSU, TCU)
Shawn Willis 6-2, 215, 4.6, Flatonia (A&M, FSU, Bay, TT)
Inside Linebacker (2)
Yamil Lebron, 6-2, 240, 4.7, Killeen Ellison (UT Commitment)
* * * *
Jeff Billings, 6-2, 232, 4.7, Pasadena Rayburn (A&M, Ky, Az, ASU, NW)
Cornerback (6)
Byron Jones, 5-10, 180, 4.4, Bay City (LSU, UCLA, A&M, NW, Ark, Ky)
Cedric Griffin, 6-1, 180, 4.4, San Antonio Holmes (UT Commitment)
Danielle Manning, 5-11, 187, 4.4, Corsicana (A&M, UT, TCU, La Tech)
Aaron Ross, 6-1, 180, 4.42, Tyler John Tyler (UT Commitment)
* * * *
Moses Harris, 6-1, 170, 4.4, Dallas Carter (FSU, OU, Mia, TCU, Gramb)
Courtney Sterling, 5-7, 170, 4.4, Dallas Carter (Arizona State Commitment)
Safety (5)
Dewayne Brandon, 6-3, 198, 4.46, Temple (UT, Neb, FSU, Colo, Ky)
Rufus Harris, 6-0, 180, 4.4, LaPorte (A&M, LSU, Az, Mia, UT)
Kendall Briles, 5-10, 175, 4.5, Wolfforth Frenship (UT Commitment)
* * * *
Jarvis Mayes, 6-2, 180, 4.45, Dallas Kimball (A&M Commitment)
Jaxson Appel, 6-0, 190, 4.5, Friendswood (A&M Commitment)
Athlete (6)
Joseph Addai, 6-1, 195, 4.5, Hstn Sharpstown (UT, Neb, Kan, Mich, A&M)
Quan Cosby, 5-10, 180, 4.4, Mart (UT, A&M, UCLA, FSU, Bay)
Gainus Scott, 5-9, 170, 4.4, La Porte (FSU, Az, Tenn, Mia, ASU, Ky)
* * * *
Ryan Gilbert, 5-11, 180, 4.4, Dallas Hillcrest (Mich, Neb, Mia, Tenn, FSU)
Braden Johnson, 6-2, 200, 4.5, Euless Trinity (UT Commitment)
Brian Carter, 5-11, 180, 4.5, The Woodlands (UT Commitment
* * * *
The 25 "Difference Makers"
These are Texas' top 25 players, in my opinion, and I have seen all of them
play, either on tape or in person:
1. DT Tommie Harris, Killeen Ellison
2. OL Jonathan Scott, Dallas Carter (Texas)
3. OL Jami Hightower, Jacksonville
4. LB Derrick Johnson, Waco
5. RB Cedric Benson, Midland Lee (Texas)
6. S Dewayne Brandon, Temple
7. RB David Underwood, Madisonville (Michigan)
8. C Ben Wilkerson, Hemphill
9. QB Matt Nordgren, Dallas Bishop Lynch
10. OL Abe Robinson, Jersey Village (Texas)
11. OL William Winston, Houston Madison
12. Ath Joseph Addai, Houston Sharpstown
13. DE Kevin Everett, Port Arthur Jefferson
14. WR Armon Dorrough, Lancaster
15. LB Jonathon Jackson, Galena Park North Shore
16. WR Brandon Jones, Texarkana Liberty Eylau
17. Ath Quan Cosby, Mart
18. WR Bennie Brazell, Houston Westbury
19. RB Anthony Johnson, Jefferson (Texas)
20. DE Simeon Jones, Houston Jones
21. CB Byron Jones, Bay City
22. DT Thomas Derricks, Dallas Jesuit
23. LB Lance McFarland, Jefferson (Texas)
24. CB Cedric Griffin, San Antonio Holmes (Texas)
25. RB Donta Hickson, McKinney
UT Commitments (16)
OFFENSE (9)
Running Back (2)
Cedric Benson, 5-11, 200, 4.5, Midland Lee
Anthony Johnson, 5-11, 195, 4.4, Jefferson
Line (7)
Jonathan Scott, 6-7, 290, 4.9, Dallas Carter
Abe Robinson, 6-6, 270, 4.9, Jersey Village
Alfio Randall, 6-6, 300, 5.1, Blinn JC
Mike Garcia, 6-5, 280, 5.2, Galena Park
Will Allen, 6-5, 300, 5.2, Cypress Falls
Roman Reeves, 6-6, 295, 5.2, Livingston
Terrance Young, 6-6, 340, 5.5, Longview
DEFENSE (7)
Linebacker (2)
Yamil LeBron, 6-2, 240, 4.7, Killeen Ellison
Lance McFarland, 6-1, 225, 4.6, Jefferson
Defensive Back (5)
Cedric Griffin, 6-1, 180, 4.4, San Antonio Holmes
Aaron Ross, 6-1, 182, 4.42, Tyler
Kendal Briles, 5-10, 175, 4.5, Wolfforth Frenship
Braden Johnson, 6-2, 200, 4.5, Euless Trinity
Brian Carter, 5-11, 180, 4.5, The Woodlands
Recruiting Roundup
Brent Rawls, 6-5, 200, 4.7, of Shreveport Evangel, the top QB prospect in
Louisiana, took his official visit to Texas last weekend.
I saw him going into the Texas dressing room after the game and he looks to
be about as big as advertised. He also appeared to be having a really good
time.
His parents came to Austin with him, which always is a good sign on an
official visit.
Look for Matt Nordgren of Dallas Bishop Lynch or Rawls to commit to the
Longhorns within the next week to 10 days. Nordgren is the most likely futu=
re
Longhorn, but it could be Rawls.
Actually, it's a great situation for the Longhorns because Nordgren is the
top QB recruit in Texas and Rawls is the best one in Louisiana, so either o=
ne
would be a big catch.
* * * *
The Longhorns are still at 16 commitments. They will sign between 22 and 25
players, so there are six to nine spots left to fill.
I think most of those spots will be filled from a group of 14 players
consisting of Nordgren or Rawls; FB James Buchanan of Sarasota, Fla.; OLs
Jami Hightower of Jacksonville and William Winston of Houston Madison; DLs
Tommie Harris of Killeen Ellison and Kaelen Jakes of Placentia, Cal.; DEs
Kevin Everett of Port Arthur Jefferson and Eric Hall of Clarksville, Tenn.;
LB Derrick Johnson of Waco; S Dewayne Brandon of Temple; Ath Joseph Addai o=
f
Houston Sharpstown and the Galena Park North Shore duo of TE James Moses an=
d
DE/LB Jonathon Jackson.
I think the Horns have at least 50-50 shots at Nordgren, Jakes, Everett,
Hall, Johnson, Brandon and Addai. I'll be surprised if they don't sign four
or five players from that group.
Buchanan, Hightower, Winston, Harris, Jackson and Moses are all strongly
considering Texas, but they also are looking at a lot of other schools.
Texas really needs to sign Harris because he is a great defensive line=20
prospect who really would be a great fit in defensive coordinator Carl
Reese's attacking style.
This is a year when great offensive line prospects are plentiful, but great
defensive linemen are scarce, and that is why Harris is such an important
part of the Longhorn recruitizing puzzle.
There is a chance some other big-time recruit will enter the picture, but
most of the remaining scholarships will go to players in one of the two
groups above.
* * * *
While big defensive line prospects are in short supply this year, I've
already seen three juniors who will be big-time recruits next year.
I've written about them before, but DTs Marco Martin, 6-4, 290, 4.8, of
Mesquite, and Rodrique Wright, 6-4, 290, 5.0, of Alief Hastings are the rea=
l
deal and so is DE Travis Leitko, 6-5, 255, 4.7, of The Woodlands. Leitko ca=
me
to the Texas camp this summer.
I have seen Wright and Leitko play twice each, and have seen Martin once an=
d
also watched a lot of tape of him playing running back and in the defensive
line. Any college would take all three in a heartbeat if they were seniors.
The program at Hastings lists Wright as weighing close to 350 pounds, but h=
e
looked more like a 270-to-290 pounder when I saw him play early this year
against Galena Park North Shore. He was a lot heavier last year, but he has
lost some weight and really is a great prospect.
While I haven't seen them play, I also have heard good things about some
other big defensive line juniors, including Damon Brown, 6-5, 265, 4.8, of
Houston Washington; Tully Jontzen, 6-4, 270, 4.8, of Keller, and Jarre
Rhodes, 6-6, 260, 4.8, of Dallas Lincoln, who also is a tight end.
While we're on the subject of juniors, there is a great linebacker at
Longview named Marvin Byrdsong. He is 6-3, weighs about 235 and runs in the
4.5 range.
Other super juniors include QBs Reggie McNeal, 6-3, 190, 4.4, of Lufkin and
Vincent Young, 6-5, 195, 4.5, of Houston Madison; RB Selvin Young, 5-11, 19=
5,
4.4, of Jersey Village; TE-OL Eric Winston, 6-6, 270, 5.0, Midland Lee, and
DB Broderick Thomas, 6-1, 180, 4.4, of Longview.
A True Orange Subscription Is
The Gift You Can Get Every
Year for Your Longhorn Friends
A subscription to True Orange is the perfect gift for any occasion for a
Longhorn who has everything else. It's only $45 ($35 by e-mail) and I'll
send an attractive card announcing your thoughtful gift.
The only thing better is a gift of True Orange and the True Orange Fax =
=01)
and you can give both for just $130 a year ($99 if they take both by e-mail=
).
o I am enclosing $45 for a gift subscription ($35 e-mail)
o I am enclosing $130 for a gift subscription to the newsletter and the fa=
x
($99 e-mail)
Name of Recipient
Address (& fax no., if applicable)
City, State, Zip
Your Name
Any Message You Want on Card
Next Issue October 9
The next issue will be e-mailed on October 2 and will report on the big
shootout with Oklahoma and preview the trip into the Rocky Mountains to tak=
e
on dangerous Colorado.
I'll also have a lot of recruiting news, reports on men's and women's
basketball and lots of other stories on the Longhorns' teams in the various
sports.
Tell Your Friends About True Orange
If you like True Orange, be sure and tell your Longhorn friends about it. I
can always use more subscribers. The more subscribers I have, the more
resources I have to call recruits and coaches and do all the other things
that give you an inside view of Longhorn sports.
SUBSCRIPTION FORM
I want to subscribe. I am enclosing $45 for the next year, which will inclu=
de
26 issues. A two-year subscription is $85. For a one-year subscription via
E-Mail, send $35.
Name
Street Address or Box Number or E-Mail Address
City, State and Zip Code
Remit to True Orange, P O Box 26530, Austin, TX 78755
Foreign Rates Available on Request. Phone 512-795-8536
E-Mail Address: truorange@aol.com
GIFT SUBSCRIPTION FORM
I want to give a gift subscription to True Orange. I am enclosing $45.
Please send an appropriate gift card. For a gift subscription via E-Mail,
send $35.
Name of Person Receiving Gift
Street Address or Box Number or E-Mail Address
City, State and Zip Code
Your Name |
keavey-p/all_documents/204. | 14029263.1075855630858.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Thu, 16 Mar 2000 06:12:00 -0800 (PST) | peter.keavey@enron.com | jeffrey.shankman@enron.com | Focus Group with traders -- EnronOnline Commercial ---------------------- Forwarded by Peter F Keavey/HOU/ECT on 03/16/2000
02:11 PM ---------------------------
From: Kal Shah 03/15/2000 03:52 PM
To: Peter F Keavey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Zal Masani/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill
White/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Palmer, Rahil Jafry
Subject: Focus Group with traders -- EnronOnline Commercial
As per our conversation today, I am helping Enron's ad agency develop a
television commercial about EnronOnline. Their creative team would like to
meet with a few Enron traders to learn first hand about what traders like,
dislike, what motivates them, their work environment, etc. This will help us
make the commercial more realistic. Would you or a couple of traders in your
team be able to attend a focus group next Tuesday, March 21st from 11:45 to 1
p.m. in the Enron Building? I'll send you the meeting room info. later. We
will serve lunch. Please let me know. Your input will be very useful in
creating an effective ad.
Kal Shah
ext. 39354 |
brawner-s/deleted_items/74. | 14801141.1075840375816.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Thu, 13 Dec 2001 09:34:06 -0800 (PST) | victor.lamadrid@enron.com | robert.superty@enron.com | FW: Reliant Entex-Tennessee Pipeline fyi.
-----Original Message-----
From: =09Garcia, Clarissa =20
Sent:=09Thursday, December 13, 2001 11:26 AM
To:=09Boyt, Eric; Dicarlo, Louis; Diamond, Russell; Neal, Scott; Versen, Vi=
ctoria; Lamadrid, Victor
Subject:=09Reliant Entex-Tennessee Pipeline
Received a phone call on Thursday, December 13th approx. 9:15am from Royal =
Edmondson, Gas Control Manager for Reliant Entex. He was trying to locate =
Victoria Versen and was eventually transferred to me. He wanted to make s=
ure Enron was delivering gas to the Entex's city gates. He asked if Enron=
was currently nominating gas to Entex city gates? What about storage? I =
told him currently we were not nominating all the gas however; the city gat=
es were kept whole with the no notice storage K#2210. He was told by Tenne=
ssee the storage was not being nominated & there was a good possibility tha=
t the city gates were not receiving their gas. I reassured him the city ga=
tes were receiving their gas. ENA does not nominate storage, it was autom=
atically done at the pipeline level due to the 2 day allocation lag. As =
per his previous conversation with Vicki Versen, he has an estimate what th=
e storage levels were & wanted to make sure there was enough gas in the st=
orage to cover December. I told him he would need to speak with Vicki on t=
hat matter. I asked him if there was a problem that needed to be resolved=
& his response: Reliant is going to wait it through to see the outcome wit=
h Enron, but wanted to make sure the gas was being delivered. =20
After the conversation, I run the storage report for December & the gas is =
automatically being withdrawn. I called Royal back and confirmed gas was =
being withdrawn from storage. He asked for a copy of the storage report. I=
did not discuss volume or what Enron's intention were at this time. I have=
not fax him a copy of the storage report as per his request. =20
I did not want to alienate Royal, but at same time I did not want to provid=
e too much information without knowing his full intentions.
Thanks,
Clarissa Hanks
Sr Specialist Logistics-East Desk Lead
x37179
=20 |
harris-s/deleted_items/185. | 15103668.1075858860934.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Wed, 24 Oct 2001 07:28:05 -0700 (PDT) | linda.wehring@enron.com | audrey.robertson@enron.com, steven.harris@enron.com, | RE: TW/NNG Projects Just to let everyone know, I had called Audrey on Tuesday, Oct. 23rd at 4:30 p.m. to inform her that we need to reschedule this meeting and move it to the next week Oct. 29th.
I have spoken to everyone in Mike's group and everyone will be available on the following dates: Oct. 29 Monday, Oct. 30 Tuesday, and Nov. 2 Friday
Audrey, please advise us of the new date that will accommodate your group schedule.
Thank,
Linda
-----Original Message-----
From: Robertson, Audrey
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 10:19 AM
To: Harris, Steven; Watson, Kimberly; Stage, Michael G.; Herber, Stephen; Burleson, Bob; Donoho, Lindy
Cc: Robertson, Audrey; Wehring, Linda
Subject: TW/NNG Projects
Please be informed, a meeting has been scheduled to meet on TW & NNG Projects. Please mark your calendars to reflect:
Friday, October 26, 1:00 - 2:00p in ECN - 1336
Thanks in advance,
adr
Audrey D. Robertson
Transwestern Pipeline Company
email address: audrey.robertson@enron.com
(713) 853-5849
(713) 646-2551 Fax |
dasovich-j/notes_inbox/122. | 31437966.1075843097684.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Thu, 31 Aug 2000 02:20:00 -0700 (PDT) | sgovenar@govadv.com | hgovenar@govadv.com, bgaillar@ees.enron.com, smccubbi@ees.enron.com, | Dan Walters Attached, please find Dan Walters' column from today's Sacramento Bee.
http://www.capitolalert.com/voices/walters/walters.aug30-00.html |
farmer-d/all_documents/2069. | 28909645.1075854015504.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Mon, 10 Apr 2000 10:24:00 -0700 (PDT) | brenda.herod@enron.com | steve.hooser@enron.com | Re: Coastal Deal-With Exxon Participation under the Project Thanks for the info!
As Greg mentioned in the staff meeting today, the intent is that this
restructured deal is papered effective 4/1/00. The impact is potentially
that the gas is not pathed properly by counterparty or on the appropriate
transport/gathering agreements, etc. If any rates are changing, then those
need to be changed in our systems also. There may be other areas of changes
also - I'm not attempting to list them all. Rather I just want to make
people aware that retroactive deals can have impacts on the daily operations.
Thanks for the information.
Pat/Daren: Can you get with Mike and/or Brian to determine the potential
impact, if any? Thanks.
From: Steve Van Hooser 04/10/2000 03:06 PM
To: Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Michael C Bilberry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian M Riley/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Coastal Deal-With Exxon Participation under the Project Agreement
Brenda,
Per your request, attached are the Draft documents which will be used to
finalize the new Gathering Arrangment between HPL and Coastal, the revenue
sharing arrangement between Exxon and HPL (Transaction Agreement) and the
Residue Gas Purchase Agreement between Coastal, as Seller and HPL as Buyer
(Amendment to Wellhead purchase agreeement).
I do not have a copy of the Processing Agreement between Exxon and Coastal,
as such agreement does not involve us (and I believe it is far from
finalized. The only other document that I plan to prepare is a termination
agreement relative to the current Liquifiables Purchase Agreement between
Exxon as purchaser and HPL as seller--this termination will be affective as
of 4/1/2000.
If I can be of any further assistance, please let me know.
Steve |
dasovich-j/notes_inbox/1289. | 25574730.1075843135118.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Tue, 31 Oct 2000 03:17:00 -0800 (PST) | jeffery.fawcett@enron.com | gjb2@pge.com | Gas Accord II Rule 51 Attached is the executed Rule 51 form.
From: Jeff Dasovich on 10/24/2000 12:52 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Gas Accord II Rule 51
FYI. For meeting with PG&E (which is Tues., Oct. 31, from 10 am-Noon (PDT)
in Enron's SF offices.
Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 10/24/2000 12:50 PM -----
"Bellenger, Geoffrey" <GJB2@pge.com>
10/23/2000 06:42 PM
To: "'jdasovic@enron.com'" <jdasovic@enron.com>
cc: "Williams, Ray" <RDW0@pge.com>, "Lindh, Frank (Law)" <FRL3@pge.com>
Subject: Gas Accord II Rule 51
Jeff
Ray Williams relayed to me that you would like to sign the Rule 51 agreement
so you can get our prior Workshop materials. All you need to do is fill out
the information form, initial (electronically) on the appropriate line, and
e-mail back to me (gjb2@pge.com).
<<Gas Accord II Information Form.doc>>
Here is a copy of Rule 51. Nothing needed on this document. It is only for
your reference.
<<CPUC Rule 51.doc>>
Call if you have questions.
Geoff
415-973-8415
- Gas Accord II Information Form.doc
- CPUC Rule 51.doc |
fossum-d/sent/621. | 16584043.1075842507132.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Wed, 29 Nov 2000 09:33:00 -0800 (PST) | drew.fossum@enron.com | kent.miller@enron.com | Re: TW Fuel I'm expecting a nastygram from Harris ragging on me for dishing out credit
for his idea, but haven't seen anything yet! DF
Kent Miller
11/29/2000 04:58 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: TW Fuel
Drew, you're so sly! Thanks for including us in your memo.
Good job in working through this issue to come up with a solution!
Kent |
dasovich-j/all_documents/98. | 27009522.1075842933145.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Sun, 24 Oct 1999 14:43:00 -0700 (PDT) | bhash1@earthlink.net | e201b-1@haas.berkeley.edu, e201b-2@haas.berkeley.edu | Section notes from 10/23 As promised, these are my section notes from Saturday. Note, there are
always some ad-libbed parts, and comments and questions from students
that are not in these notes.
I've attached the file as a Word97 file. If you have problems reading
this or importing it, let me know. I also plan to have prof. Levine
post it on the class web site.
Bhash
- Section one notes.doc |
grigsby-m/deleted_items/33. | 17209468.1075853104875.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Thu, 25 Oct 2001 21:13:24 -0700 (PDT) | no.address@enron.com | All Enron Downtown@ENRON | Upcoming Wellness Activities CPR and First Aid Certification
CPR and First Aid certification is being offered on Thursday, November 15, 2001, from 1:30 p.m. - 5:30 p.m. in the Body Shop, Studio B. Cost is $10 for employees and EDS; $40 for contractors. To register or for more information contact mailto:wellness@enron.com. Registration deadline is Monday, November 12.
Mammogram Screening
The M. D. Anderson Mobile Mammography van will be at Enron November 12-16, 2001, from 8 a.m. - 4 p.m. Cost is $25 for Enron employees, spouses, retirees and EDS; $85 for Contractors. Payment must be made by check or money order ONLY, payable to Enron Corp., and is due at time of service. NO CASH WILL BE ACCEPTED. Appointments can be made by calling 713-745-4000. For more information about M. D. Anderson's mobile mammography program: http://www.mdanderson.org/Departments/MobileMamm/dIndex.cfm?pn=29C87A2E-B66A-11D4-80FB00508B603A14.
Please consider adding an extra $1 to the mammogram cost for The Rose. The Rose is a non-profit organization that provides mammograms to women without access to medical insurance. http://www.the-rose.org/. Other inquiries can be directed to: mailto:wellness@enron.com. |
bass-e/deleted_items/8. | 3809363.1075840311487.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Tue, 5 Feb 2002 07:50:22 -0800 (PST) | laura.vuittonet@enron.com | barry.tycholiz@enron.com, stephanie.miller@enron.com, | FW: Fundamentals Presentation -----Original Message-----
From: Rybarski, Amanda
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 9:22 AM
To: Vuittonet, Laura; Rangel, Ina; Young, Becky; Hogan, Irena D.
Subject: RE: Fundamentals Presentation
This meeting has been changed to Thursday, Feb 7th from 2-4 p.m. It will be held in the same conference room (ECS06990).
Thanks,
Amanda
-----Original Message-----
From: Rybarski, Amanda
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 10:24 AM
To: Vuittonet, Laura; Rangel, Ina; Young, Becky; Hogan, Irena D.
Subject: Fundamentals Presentation
Assistants, please forward to your groups.
The Fundamentals group is giving a presentation tomorrow, Feb 5th from 2-4 in room ECS06990.
The topic will be the Gas Market.
Thanks,
Amanda Rybarski
Gas Fundamentals
Office: (713) 853-4384
Fax: (713) 646-8453
Pager: (877) 482-0772
Cell: (713) 560-0934 |
fossum-d/all_documents/684. | 21208429.1075842439727.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Fri, 3 Nov 2000 08:23:00 -0800 (PST) | ets.announcement@enron.com | enron.operations@enron.com | ETS - QuickPlace/IdeaBank Outage On Friday, November 3, at 4:30, we will be migrating the ETS QuickPlace
server. The maintenance is expected to last approximately 30 minutes
What does this mean to you?
Users who access the IdeaBank or any QuickPlace discussion sites, i.e. ETS
Infrastructure, Program Office, ETS Standards will not be able to access them
until the server has been brought back up.
The IdeaBank will automatically be rerouted to the new server. However, any
references to GTHOU-WW01P/QuickPlace will need to be changed to
NAHOU-LNWW01/QuickPlace.
If you have any concerns about this maintenance, please contact the Customer
Assistance Center at 713-345-4745
Customer Assistance Center |
dasovich-j/all_documents/8920. | 2514947.1075843351223.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Tue, 6 Feb 2001 15:33:00 -0800 (PST) | jeff.dasovich@enron.com | alan.comnes@enron.com, angela.schwarz@enron.com, beverly.aden@enron.com, | Judge Orders Supplier To Continue Selling Power To Calif ----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/06/2001 11:32 PM -----
Alan Comnes@ECT
02/06/2001 09:30 PM
To: Angela Schwarz/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Beverly Aden/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Bill
Votaw/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Brenda Barreda/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Carol
Moffett/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Cathy Corbin/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Chris H
Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christina Liscano/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Christopher F
Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Craig H Sutter/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Dan
Leff/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Debora Whitehead/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Dennis
Benevides/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Dorothy
Youngblood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Douglas Huth/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Edward
Sacks/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eric Melvin/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Erika
Dupre/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Fran
Deltoro/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Gayle W Muench/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Ginger
Dernehl/NA/Enron@ENRON, Gordon Savage/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Harold G
Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@ENRON, Iris
Waser/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, James W
Lewis/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, James Wright/Western Region/The Bentley
Company@Exchange@ENRON, Jeff Messina/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Jeremy
Blachman/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Jess Hewitt/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathy
Bass/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Kathy Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Ken
Gustafson/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Kevin Hughes/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Leasa
Lopez/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Leticia Botello/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Mark S
Muller/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Marsha Suggs/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Marty
Sunde/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Meredith M Eggleston/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Michael
Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Mann/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Michelle D
Cisneros/HOU/ECT@ECT, mpalmer@enron.com@ENRON, Neil
Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Neil Hong/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Paula Warren/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Richard L
Zdunkewicz/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Richard Leibert/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, Rita Hennessy/NA/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rosalinda Tijerina/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Gahn/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Sharon
Dick/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, skean@enron.com@ENRON, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Tanya Leslie/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Tasha Lair/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Ted
Murphy/LON/ECT@ECT, Terri Greenlee/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tony Spruiell/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Vladimir
Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jubran Whalan/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON,
triley@enron.com@ENRON, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert C
Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON,
dwatkiss@bracepatt.com@ENRON, rcarroll@bracepatt.com@ENRON, Donna
Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, gfergus@brobeck.com@ENRON, Kathryn
Corbally/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bruno Gaillard/EU/Enron@Enron, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Ren, Lazure/Western Region/The Bentley
Company@Exchange@ENRON, Michael Tribolet/Corp/Enron@Enron, Phillip K
Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, jklauber@llgm.com@ENRON,
Tamara Johnson/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg
Wolfe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Dirk vanUlden/Western
Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange@ENRON, Steve Walker/SFO/EES@EES@ENRON,
Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Judge Orders Supplier To Continue Selling Power To Calif
Good morning !
Judge Orders Supplier To Continue Selling Power To Calif
02/06/2001
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP)--A U.S. judge Tuesday temporarily ordered an
electricity supplier to continue selling power to the state, effectively
extending an emergency federal directive. Two other suppliers agreed they
would continue sales as well.
U.S. District Judge Frank Damrell, citing the possibility of "obvious
irreparable harm to the public," said Tuesday his temporary order requires
Reliant Energy Services Inc. to continue sales at least until a further
hearing on Wednesday.
Wholesalers AES Pacific Inc. and Dynegy Power Corp., not covered under the
temporary injunction, said they would continue sales until that hearing as
well.
The suppliers provide enough electricity to serve 4 million homes.
Electricity grid officials said losing that source could have produced
rolling blackouts like the ones that hit the state twice last month.
The Independent System Operator, which maintains the state's power grid,
sought the restraining order on an emergency basis as the federal directive
neared its midnight PST Tuesday expiration.
President Bush had said his administration would not renew the orders, which
were first issued by the Clinton administration and were extended by Spencer
Abraham, Bush's energy secretary.
Reliant filed a lawsuit against the system operator last week after receiving
a letter it sent to 140 power generators asking them to agree to continue
selling power after the expiration. The Houston-based company said it should
not have to bear the cost of California's energy crisis.
Reliant representatives did not immediately return calls for comment Tuesday.
Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. |
germany-c/sent/631. | 15202212.1075853796930.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Fri, 14 Jul 2000 08:41:00 -0700 (PDT) | chris.germany@enron.com | dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com, cdalpho@columbiaenergygroup.com | CES Deal 282945 Hi Gang. Doug found my mistake and the correct price is $4.6913. I changed
the price in Sirara. Sorry Jeff.
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 07/14/2000 03:40
PM ---------------------------
Chris Germany
07/14/2000 08:29 AM
To: dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com, cdalpho@columbiaenergygroup.com
cc: Molly Sumrow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff W Westover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joann
Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: CES Deal 282945
This deal is gas ENA sold to CES for Energy Express. The daily volume was
10,322 dth (a total of 309,660 for the month). The price is CGAS IF + $.0175
+ Variable + $.02 demand for ENA transport
I just changed the price in Sitara. My calculation shows a price of $4.6738.
Jeff, I apologize for this if you have sent out the invoice already. Please
correct the invoice for this deal and let me know when you send it out.
Thanks. |
dasovich-j/notes_inbox/1133. | 5105916.1075843129849.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Tue, 24 Oct 2000 11:08:00 -0700 (PDT) | james.steffes@enron.com | tim.belden@enron.com | Re: Information Release Message I vote for waiting until Monday to discuss. This is one part of the larger
PR / Government Affairs strategy in California. We need Karen Denne (PR) to
come to Portland for the meeting on Monday.
Jim
Tim Belden@ECT
10/24/2000 05:54 PM
To: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Information Release Message
When do you guys want to talk through this? Who should be involved? Can it
wait until Monday when we have our California meeting here in Portland? |
crandell-s/sent_items/151. | 3512273.1075863609496.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Tue, 29 Jan 2002 15:31:04 -0800 (PST) | sean.crandall@enron.com | dale.rasmussen@enron.com | RE: BPA Termination of Contracts I agree with this.
-----Original Message-----
From: Rasmussen, Dale
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 11:29 AM
To: Miller, Don (Asset Mktg); Tweed, Sheila; Baughman, Edward; Richter, Brad; Haedicke, Mark E.; Sager, Elizabeth; Murphy, Harlan
Cc: Hall, Steve C. (Legal); Crandall, Sean; Calger, Christopher F.; Thome, Stephen; Jones, Karen E.; Erwin, Kenton; Yoder, Christian
Subject: BPA Termination of Contracts
Importance: High
Sensitivity: Confidential
Yesterday we received a letter from BPA under which BPA terminated two of its agreements. Ed, Harlan and I discussed some aspects of this earlier today.
Some additional information that Steve Hall and I just discussed is summarized below.
The effect of this termination on our power scheduling is that the West Desk is now short by 202 MW over its earlier position.
After termination the contract positions are:
COB: 150 MW on peak (purchase from BPA)
200 MW off-peak (purchase from BPA)
Mid-C: (339) MW on peak (delivery to BPA)
(238) MW off peak (delivery to BPA)
Terminated contract numbers:
97 PB-10123 (Wauna/James River)
98 PB-10277 (Firm Power Sale)
The termination fo the Wauna/James River contract presumably also terminates the "book out" agreement negotiated earlier this year, and increases our net short position to BPA.
Dale Rasmussen
Tel: (503) 464-8863
Fax: (503) 464-8058
(and Steve Hall) |
dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5651. | 19412058.1075843753119.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Thu, 25 Jan 2001 02:51:00 -0800 (PST) | steve_debruyn@notes.teradyne.com | sboyle@haas.berkeley.edu, jochu@haas.berkeley.edu, | Upload to Izio I was unsuccessful in getting these files added to the Izio system so I am
re-mailing them to the distribution list used by Diane earlier this week.
My apologies to those who have received this two or three times now.....
Steve
---------------------- Forwarded by Steve DeBruyn/Bos/Teradyne on
01/25/2001 07:51 AM ---------------------------
Steve DeBruyn
01/23/2001 07:46 AM
To: e234-1@haas.bekerley.edu
cc: Mukesh_bajaj@lecg.com
Subject: Upload to Izio
For those of you on the class list, here are the files from Prof. Bajaj
Steve DeBruyn
(See attached file: E 234_outline_Spring2001.doc)
(See attached file: Amerhome.xls)(See attached file: Arundel.xlw)(See
attached file: Bfgood.xls)(See attached file: CaseQuestions.doc)(See
attached file: Clarkson.xlw)(See attached file: Dupont83.xls)(See attached
file: Gulfoil.xlw)(See attached file: Marriot.xls)(See attached file:
Netscape.xlw)(See attached file: Philmorr.xlw)(See attached file:
Timewar.xls)
- E 234_outline_Spring2001.doc
- Amerhome.xls
- Arundel.xlw
- Bfgood.xls
- CaseQuestions.doc
- Clarkson.xlw
- Dupont83.xls
- Gulfoil.xlw
- Marriot.xls
- Netscape.xlw
- Philmorr.xlw
- Timewar.xls |
germany-c/all_documents/2704. | 1358206.1075853860333.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Wed, 9 May 2001 03:12:00 -0700 (PDT) | chris.germany@enron.com | ingrid.immer@williams.com | Hey I called your work number and noooooo body anwsered!!!!!!! We are going to
lunch with Dan today. |
dasovich-j/gspp_conference/22. | 9932011.1075843084806.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Fri, 4 Aug 2000 04:40:00 -0700 (PDT) | gramlr@pjm.com | jdasovic@enron.com | RE: GSPP on the forefront I'm walking home for lunch and I'll call in 5 minutes. or you can try me
there
at 610-676-0483 between then and 12:30 (9:30) or so.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jdasovic@enron.com [SMTP:jdasovic@enron.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 04, 2000 11:30 AM
> To: gramlr@pjm.com
> Subject: RE: GSPP on the forefront
>
>
> can you give me a call? 415.782.7822. i'm freed up from a call i'm on in
> about 15 minutes.
>
>
>
>
> gramlr@pjm.com on 08/04/2000 08:26:16 AM
>
> To: jdasovic@enron.com
> cc:
> Subject: RE: GSPP on the forefront
>
>
> The threshold question is sponsorship, so if you have any ideas I'd
> appreciate
> it. My contacts are all academics/policy people which is of no help at
> all.
>
> Do you work for Kaufman? What's he like? It sounds like you know about
> the
> position--would it be working with you?
> Rob
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: jdasovic@enron.com [SMTP:jdasovic@enron.com]
> > Sent: Friday, August 04, 2000 11:13 AM
> > To: gramlr@pjm.com
> > Subject: Re: GSPP on the forefront
> >
> >
> > Greetings. Hold on, you mean someone's happy being involved with PJM?
> You
> > may be the only one (kidding). Great to hear from. Think it would be a
> > great idea to do a forum. My preference would be to bring all of Enron's
> > resources (other than cash) to the effort. But we can talk. Be happy to
> > get involved. Like to do it sooner rather than later given the atmo
> (Davis
> > has appointed Commissioners Lenin and Trotsky to the California PUC).
> >
> > You would be THE perfect person for that job, and think you should take
> it.
> > Let's talk more.
> >
> > Best,
> > Jeff
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > gramlr@pjm.com on 08/04/2000 08:06:39 AM
> >
> > To: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
> > cc:
> > Subject: GSPP on the forefront
> >
> >
> > > Jeff,
> > > How are you? Wild prices and politics out there I gather. I have a
> > > question/proposal for you. A major goal that is shared by the GSPP
> > alumni
> > > board
> > > and the school is to host policy forums that attract top academics,
> > policy
> > > makers, and public attention as not only a good public service, but at
> > good PR
> > > for the school and its mission. Since electricity deregulation in CA
> is
> > on
> > > the
> > > front page of all major newspapers this summer, the Dean and I are
> > interested
> > > in
> > > putting together an electricity policy forum. I would need your
> > contacts,
> > > political sense, and perhaps some financial support from Enron to make
> > this
> > > work. Do you like the idea and would you be willing to help in some of
> > these
> > > ways? I think it is in the interest of Enron to advance reasoned
> debate
> > with
> > > the backing of the independent/objective GSPP against what is already a
> > major
> > > emotional/political backlash.
> > >
> > > On a totally unrelated issue, I spoke with Tim Belden about a position
> in
> > the
> > > Enron govt affairs group working with the trading desk. I guess the VP
> > for
> > > the
> > > West, Kaufman, is supposed to call me. If the job is really to
> > understand and
> > > follow RTO developments and their interaction with energy prices it
> seems
> > a
> > > perfect fit with what I've been doing. I told Tim I'm happy where I am
> > but
> > > the
> > > opportunity sounds interesting.
> > > Cheers,
> > > Rob
> > >
> > > Rob Gramlich
> > > PJM Market Monitoring Unit
> > > (610) 666-4291
> > > gramlr@pjm.com
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> |
campbell-l/all_documents/1529. | 6134653.1075857897684.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Wed, 25 Apr 2001 15:55:00 -0700 (PDT) | enron.announcements@enron.com | all.houston@enron.com | Enron Astroworld Tickets Enron announces UNLIMITED discounted AstroWorld tickets for employees.
Due to overwhelming employee feedback, we have negotiated unlimited
discounted AstroWorld tickets for you and your family in place of the
traditional "Enron Day At AstroWorld." We hope this will allow Enron
families to plan their fun-filled summer trips to AstroWorld at their own
convenience. Enron AstroWorld tickets are $20.56 (Retail $50), which
includes admission for one, plus a $7 meal ticket to one of five restaurants
at AstroWorld.
Six Flags AstroWorld is a world-class family entertainment complex filled
with exciting rides and attractions, including 10 heart-pounding coasters,
over 40 blockbuster shows, interactive street entertainers and star-studded
concerts. Enron families will be able to purchase unlimited tickets for use
anytime during the 2001 season.
Tickets will be on sale at Enron's Federal Credit Union, EB0399. Visit the
credit union in person to make your purchases. AstroWorld tickets will not
be mailed. Enron employees who are not already Enron FCU members may pay by
cash or money order only. All Enron Employees are encouraged to take
advantage of this great summer fun deal and may purchase tickets through
August 30th. |
baughman-d/sent_items/27. | 27267839.1075840347285.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Mon, 28 Jan 2002 14:39:27 -0800 (PST) | don.baughman@enron.com | bill.rust@enron.com, corry.bentley@enron.com, debra.bailey@enron.com, | Transmission Agreements Meeting Tues. Jan. 29 10:00 a.m. Hey,
After speaking with Reagan in origination, we thought it would be a good idea to evaluate the status of New Transmission Agreements project.
If it pleases all, let's all get together from 10:00 to 10:30 on Tuesday Jan. 29.
If you have any questions or timing conflicts give me a shout.
Don Baughman
Wk: 3-0392
Cell: 281-787-0029 |
blair-l/meetings/695. | 31284197.1075853040693.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Wed, 27 Jun 2001 16:02:00 -0700 (PDT) | outlook.team@enron.com | Terry K. - Oncall CALENDAR ENTRY: APPOINTMENT
Description:
Terry K. - Oncall
Date: 2/17/2001
Time: 7:00 AM - 8:00 AM (Central Standard Time)
Chairperson: Outlook Migration Team
Detailed Description: |
|
dasovich-j/sent/1173. | 28285374.1075843212263.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Wed, 29 Nov 2000 09:57:00 -0800 (PST) | jeff.dasovich@enron.com | zangeles@sempra.com | RE: GIR PD Thanks, Zenee. I will participate by phone.
Best,
Jeff |
dasovich-j/all_documents/3938. | 27879301.1075843048814.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Tue, 28 Nov 2000 08:14:00 -0800 (PST) | douglass@arterhadden.com | jdasovic@enron.com, marcie.milner@enron.com, mpetroch@enron.com, | SoCalGas Advice Letters Attached are summaries of two SoCalGas advice letters.? Some info here on
consolidated billing may be of interest to your gas marketers, but does not
appear to be protest material.
?
Dan
- 11-28-00 SoCalGas AL Summary Chart.doc |
dasovich-j/inbox/515. | 29536387.1075851654868.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Mon, 8 Oct 2001 18:06:18 -0700 (PDT) | nancy.sellers@robertmondavi.com | jeff.dasovich@enron.com | RE: Should be $30 retail - plus tax. I sent you an order form so you could see
all the different prices.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 5:21 PM
To: Nancy Sellers
Subject: RE:
I would bet that we'll be there. I'll bring my check book. Is the 97
cab $32 retail? If it is, it's worth it.
With Barry doing what he did, getting to the playoffs was icing on the
cake. But, man, that Friday night game was a heart-breaker.
We'll see you Sunday!
Kisses,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Nancy Sellers [mailto:Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com]
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 6:29 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE:
No I was just glad she was so generous and I am hoping that that will
continue!
I will order the wine tomorrow if you really will be by on Sunday. I
can
only have 2 cases delivered at a time. So I'll get the Coastal first.
It
comes to $152.74 (less $80) = $72.74
The 97 cab will be $193.50
Total = $266.24
Great Niner game - sorry about your Giants - I was rooting for them!
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 4:00 PM
To: Nancy Sellers
Subject: RE:
I would have been happy to let you have it. You still can, you know.
Just let me know (though we love to keep it). We're allegedly going to
the dome this weekend, so perhaps we could pick it up on our way back on
Sunday. But if that's a bother, don't worry about it--we can do it
another time. And what about those 9-ers?
-----Original Message-----
From: Nancy Sellers [mailto:Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com]
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 4:15 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE:
So did I!! Thank you for the check - I appreciate it. I was actually
kind
of hoping you wouldn't want it! It is such great wine and I did not
expect
her to give me the 50% off or I would have bought more! When would you
be
around to pick up your other wine? I don't want to order it and have it
sitting in our clean garage! Also the check you sent for golf was too
much
because you guys walked and did not take a cart. You should have paid
$80 -
so you have an $80 credit toward wine.
Miss you guys
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 11:32 AM
To: Nancy Sellers (E-mail)
Subject:
Thanks so much for the Storybook wine. Extremely sweet of you, and we
really appreciate it. I gave Eldon the check for it. Man, did we get
CREAMED in the pool. Sigh....
Best,
Jeff
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence
a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
********************************************************************** |
baughman-d/power/24_hour/152. | 23464790.1075855150614.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Wed, 25 Apr 2001 15:37:00 -0700 (PDT) | john.forney@enron.com | don.baughman@enron.com | Duke Purchase for tomorrow, April 26th I have purchased from Duke 100 mw's at $51 for flow into Entergy (see deal#591863) . Duke is transmitting this power through their capacity through SOCO. In the event of TLR's, we have the option of cutting this supply, without booking out (deal was negotiated with Amar).
If this happens, of course you need to fill the demand side and cut the purchase from Duke in enpower - see deal no. above. The purchases go in the ST SPP book.
Once again, If RT has to intervene, please make sure that Enpower is balanced with respect to ST SPP. Also, let me know immediately if there are problems with this or any other schedule that I have.
You guys are doing a good job.
JMF |
allen-p/discussion_threads/379. | 12302226.1075855707785.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Wed, 27 Dec 2000 04:43:00 -0800 (PST) | phillip.allen@enron.com | jsmith@austintx.com | Jeff,
Everything should be done for closing on the Leander deal on the 29th. I
have fed ex'd the closing statements and set up a wire transfer to go out
tomorrow. When will more money be required? Escrow for roads? Utility
connections? Other rezoning costs?
What about property taxes? The burnet land lost its ag exemption while I
owned it. Are there steps we can take to hold on to the exemption on this
property? Can you explain the risks and likelihood of any rollback taxes
once the property is rezoned? Do we need to find a farmer and give him
grazing rights?
What are the important dates coming up and general status of rezoning and
annexing? I am worried about the whole country slipping into a recession and
American Multifamily walking on this deal. So I just want to make sure we
are pushing the process as fast as we can.
Phillip |
dasovich-j/sent/905. | 11890567.1075843205607.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Wed, 8 Nov 2000 04:11:00 -0800 (PST) | jeff.dasovich@enron.com | 9167185@skytel.com | i'm off the call. all yours. that ok? kisses. |
dasovich-j/all_documents/10686. | 10360330.1075843414740.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Thu, 5 Apr 2001 02:57:00 -0700 (PDT) | rob.bradley@enron.com | richard.shapiro@enron.com, james.steffes@enron.com, jeff.dasovich@enron.com | Final Draft: Adriam Moore Price Caps Paper (7 Pages) Adrian has incorporated my edits, so I send it to you for any FINAL changes
you recommend. Please contact Adrian directly--I am leaving town and he is
anxious to complete this and put it in the public domain.
I'd look carefully at the last 2 1/2 pages on alternatives to price
caps--state and federal reforms.
If this is turned around tomorrow, have Adrian send it to one of you for
distribution to Linda Robertson et al.
Thanks,
- Rob
----- Forwarded by Rob Bradley/Corp/Enron on 04/05/2001 09:51 AM -----
Adriantm@aol.com
04/04/2001 08:08 PM
To: Rob.Bradley@enron.com, lkiesling@lycos.com
cc:
Subject: Re: price caps letter
Here is the yet-again revised draft of the letter. ?Is this ready to go? ?Or
did you have someone else to review it? ?Let me know right away, I would
like
to get the mailing started.
Adrian
- Price controls letter 5.doc |
bass-e/deleted_items/297. | 26652731.1075861324946.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Tue, 20 Nov 2001 19:15:42 -0800 (PST) | annualconference@prosrm.com | ebass@enron.com | PROS Announces Record Third Quarter and YTD 2001 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
PROS Revenue Management Announces Record Third Quarter and YTD 2001
November 20, 2001-Houston- PROS Revenue Management, the world's leader in revenue management science and the pioneer and dominant provider of revenue management to the airline and energy industries, today announced that third quarter, although impacted by the tragic events of September 11, 2001, was a record revenue quarter for the company, and the company achieved low double digit operating income levels. PROS posted revenue in the first nine months of the year of $27.7 million, which is a 36% increase over the previous year. Record profits, along with positive cash flow, enhanced PROS' strong balance sheet. PROS also posted record annual revenues and profits for 2000.
"Our goal is to be the clear leader in the new Revenue Pricing Optimization category," says Bert Winemiller, president and CEO of PROS. "Our financial performance of record revenues, profits, and cash flow will enable PROS to maintain its commitment to achieving this goal and provide high value solutions to our clients."
PROS Pricing Revenue Optimization Solutions' major milestones in the first nine months of 2001 include:
o In the airline industry, PROS completed signed contracts with airline companies, including Aeropostal, Air Jamaica, All Nippon Airways, Cathay Pacific, Delta Air Lines, Korean Air, Singapore Airlines, South African Airways, and TWA/American Airlines.
o Contracts were signed in the energy industry with major US gas pipeline companies.
o PROS concluded its second contract for Network Optimization (O&D) in the airline industry. This product will become the standard for the industry.
o Energy Pricing & Revenue Optimization Seminars were held with participation from industry leaders and Accenture.
o PROS hosted its first Pricing Optimization Web Seminar which covered pricing optimization principles common among virtually all industries. Participants included executives of some of the strongest Fortune 500 companies.
o PROS completed the move of its headquarters to the ComTech Center in midtown Houston. This state-of-the-art facility will assist in the support of PROS' expansion both internally and into other industries.
o PROS announced its 9th Annual Pricing and Revenue Optimization Conference, the largest revenue management conference in the world, with industry leaders, analysts and representatives from industries such as airline, energy, healthcare, hospitality, broadcast, rental car, and rail. The Conference will take place March 3-7, 2002.
About PROS
PROS Revenue Management is the world's leader in pricing and revenue optimization solutions and the pioneer and dominant provider of revenue management to the airline and energy industries. PROS provides system solutions to the airline, cargo, rail, energy, healthcare, and broadcast industries, and has delivered over 230 systems to more than 90 clients in 39 countries. PROS' clients include 15 of the top 25 carriers in the airline industry.
The PROS mission is to maximize the revenue of each client using PROS' world-leading revenue management science, systems solutions, and best practices business consulting. PROS' clients report annual incremental revenue increases of 6-8% as a result of revenue management. PROS' solutions forecast demand, optimize inventory, and provide dynamic pricing to maximize revenue.
Founded in 1985 in Houston, PROS Revenue Management has a six-year compounded revenue growth of 40%, in large part due to the intellectual capital of its staff. Nearly half of PROS' professional staff has advanced degrees and the staff speaks a cumulative total of 26 languages. The company is profitable with Year 2000 revenue of $29 million. For more information on PROS Revenue Management, please visit www.prosRM.com or call 713-335-5253.
PROS' 9th Annual Pricing and Revenue Optimization Conference will be March 3-7, 2002. This premiere event will feature industry leaders participating in presentations, panel discussions, and product workshops. Join industry colleagues, academics, and representatives from the international business community at large to discuss relevant topics specific to the airline industry and to the practice of revenue management. We have broadened our scope this year to include separate sessions related to other industries benefiting from revenue management, such as Energy, Healthcare, Hospitality, Broadcast, Rental Car, and Rail.
More information and formal invitations are coming soon. In the meantime, be sure to save the following dates on your calendar:
March 3-7, 2002
Houstonian Hotel, Club & Spa
Houston, Texas
If you have further questions or if you are interested in speaking at this event, joining discussions as a panelist, or becoming a sponsor, please contact Andrea Balfour at abalfour@prosRM.com.
Contact:
Candy Haase - VP Marketing
713-335-5253 / 713-335-8144 - fax
chaase@prosRM.com |
corman-s/inbox/archives/73. | 24188349.1075861086422.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Sat, 9 Feb 2002 06:36:57 -0800 (PST) | news@real-net.net | scorman@enron.com | Hot Game - Free Demo! <http://www.real-net.net/R/EMAL.020128EMAL15img.rp.00..R/html-images.realnetworks.com/pics/clear_.gif>
Unsubscribe at bottom
<http://www.real.com/R/EMAL.020128EMAL15.rp.01.img.R/realguide.real.com/games/?s=game_download?=diamondmine>
<http://html-images.realnetworks.com/pics/real/email/rpgames/txt_diamondmine_1.gif>
Easy to learn, tough to leave! Just try to play this addictive puzzle game (also known as Bejeweled) only once! Simply match three gems in a row to advance. Easy, right? Try normal or timed modes and discover the hardest thing of all... stopping the gem-matching fun once you start!
<http://www.real.com/R/EMAL.020128EMAL15.rp.02.img.R/realguide.real.com/games/?s=game_download?=diamondmine>
<http://html-images.realnetworks.com/pics/clear.gif>
<http://html-images.realnetworks.com/pics/real/email/rpgames/silverbar_1.gif>
<http://html-images.realnetworks.com/pics/clear.gif>
<http://html-images.realnetworks.com/pics/clear.gif>
Take a break now and try Diamond Mine for free!
<http://html-images.realnetworks.com/pics/clear.gif>
<http://html-images.realnetworks.com/pics/real/email/rpgames/bullet_diamond_1.gif> <http://html-images.realnetworks.com/pics/clear.gif> High-resolution 3D graphics and fast action "click & drag" interface.
<http://html-images.realnetworks.com/pics/real/email/rpgames/bullet_diamond_1.gif> A challenging variety of normal and timed play modes.
<http://html-images.realnetworks.com/pics/real/email/rpgames/bullet_diamond_1.gif> Multiple skill levels and graphic backgrounds.
<http://html-images.realnetworks.com/pics/real/email/rpgames/bullet_diamond_1.gif> Pulsing soundtrack by Future Crew composer Skaven.
<http://html-images.realnetworks.com/pics/clear.gif>
<http://html-images.realnetworks.com/pics/clear.gif>
<http://html-images.realnetworks.com/pics/real/email/rpgames/diamond_left_1.gif> Download Diamond Mine - FREE <http://www.real.com/R/EMAL.020128EMAL15.rp.03.txt.R/realguide.real.com/games/?s=game_download?=diamondmine> <http://html-images.realnetworks.com/pics/real/email/rpgames/diamond_right_1.gif>
<http://html-images.realnetworks.com/pics/clear.gif>
<http://html-images.realnetworks.com/pics/real/email/rpgames/silverbar_1.gif>
<http://html-images.realnetworks.com/pics/clear.gif> remove me <http://www.real.com/R/EMAL.020128EMAL15.rp.remove..R/post.real.com/ml/ml.html?email=scorman@enron.com> privacy policy <http://www.real.com/R/EMAL.020128EMAL15.rp.privacy..R/www.realnetworks.com/company/privacy/index.html>
You received this e-mail because you downloaded a RealPlayer
, RealJukebox
, or another product from Real.com? and indicated a preference to receive special offers from RealNetworks
, or you subscribed to the Special Offers e-mail category in your account area. If you do not wish to receive e-mails from us in the future, click on the "remove me" link above.
RealNetworks, Real.com, RealPlayer, and RealJukebox are trademarks or registered trademarks of RealNetworks, Inc. All other companies or products listed herein are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. <http://html-images.realnetworks.com/pics/clear.gif> |
cash-m/inbox/65. | 31124707.1075853132846.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Tue, 23 Oct 2001 14:14:37 -0700 (PDT) | shanna.funkhouser@enron.com | michelle.cash@enron.com | Project Fireball (personnel question) Michelle,
The Coal group has a question related to personnel they would acquire from Vulcan if they purchased the marketing rights to their coal. In this scenario, there are 4 marketing employees which would come to Enron as a part of the deal. A few things:
In this case, I'm assuming these employees would resign from Vulcan and Enron would extend the appropriate offer.
Secondly, Enron's purchase of the marketing rights will be for an 18mo to 3 year trial period. At the end of the trial period, if Enron returns the marketing rights to Vulcan (or current owner), they want the right to re-call these employees. George McClellan is ok with the right to recall, but I am not sure how/where to put this in writing ie; in the deal agreement, offer letter, etc.
Thanks,
Shanna |
guzman-m/all_documents/1809. | 31840797.1075840629866.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Mon, 6 Nov 2000 17:48:00 -0800 (PST) | thinkguzman@yahoo.com | mark.guzman@enron.com | The beginning of the end!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Hi Mark,
I think I'm finally convinced that it's probably best to have an alcoholic as
President following Clinton's sexual escapades!!? This way in four years we
can try to find a recovering drug addict to keep the faith.? Then, we can
just turn the White House into a whore house because a Mexican Pimp could
then be our next choice? -? what do ya think?!?
Don't forget to vote for Gore to offset my Bush vote!!
Love ya - mean it!!!?? UNCLE BOB
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. All with one
Wallet. |
gay-r/discussion_threads/102. | 2036126.1075849803644.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Wed, 28 Feb 2001 01:58:00 -0800 (PST) | rob.gay@enron.com | peter.weidler@enron.com, peter.anderson@enron.com | Rob's e-mail My e-mail is: RGGDEE@AOL.com
home phone is 281-334-2360.
Will advise of cel # when I get one (soon). |
dasovich-j/sent/3449. | 991233.1075843858598.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Wed, 28 Feb 2001 10:37:00 -0800 (PST) | jeff.dasovich@enron.com | pacstar@mcn.org | Re: Growing Coastal Grapes Thanks so much for responding, Sally. Very interested in exploring the
possibilities with you. Greatly appreciated.
Wow, that's the only other Jeff Dasovich I've ever heard of. No kidding.
Referred to you by Lee Green. Don't yet have soil test or temp profiles, but
am in the process of figuring out how to get them done. Any suggestions are
welcome and appreciated. I'll be around the weekend of March 10th. If that
works for you, great; otherwise, we can try another date.
Again, can't thank you enough for responding. I don't know where it'll lead,
but I've got a hunch that it just might work out.
Enjoy drinking your wine (had the syrah recently) and very much look forward
to meeting you.
All the best,
Jeff
Sally Ottoson <pacstar@mcn.org>
02/28/2001 05:05 PM
Please respond to pacstar
To: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Growing Coastal Grapes
Hi Jeff:
I know a Jeff Dasovich, exact spelling, an attorney in
Oklahoma City...I'm looking forward to talking to you about
the potential for vineyard. Please call me at 707-964-1155,
I zoom around pretty fast but should be able to get down
there soon. Do you have soil test results/temp profiles -
were you referred to me by Alan Green of Greenwood Ridge? Sally |
campbell-l/discussion_threads/718. | 23763026.1075857862177.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Thu, 9 Nov 2000 06:03:00 -0800 (PST) | mailbot@datek.com | lcampbel@enron.com | "Datek Online execution report" Dear Mr. LARRY CAMPBELL:
Thank you for your order.
You sold 60 shares of PMCS (Pmc-sierra Inc Com) at 102.000000.
ORDER DETAILS:
The tracking number for this order is: B-300-AAYS-9643
Order entered at: 09:02:29 on 11/09/00
Order processing began at: 09:02:30
Order executed at: 09:02:32 on 11/09/00
ACCOUNT DETAILS:
Time and Date: 09:02:32 on 11/09/00
Your position in PMCS is 0 shares
Your real cash total is $-8,266.92
You will receive a printed Datek Online confirmation by postal mail, or by
electronic delivery if you are subscribed to that service.
Questions regarding this transaction? Contact our Customer Support department
by e-mailing support@datek.com. Please reference the order tracking number. |
jones-t/sent/2275. | 22550582.1075847205268.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Tue, 31 Oct 2000 01:42:00 -0800 (PST) | tana.jones@enron.com | james.keller@enron.com, brent.hendry@enron.com | Springs SWAP Confirmations At Brent's request, I am sending you the memo below.
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 10/31/2000 09:41 AM -----
Molly Harris
10/18/2000 06:37 PM
To: Meredith M Eggleston/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Paul
Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Karen A Cordova/HOU/EES@EES, James E Keller/HOU/EES@EES,
Timothy J Hamilton/HOU/EES@EES, Eric Melvin/HOU/EES@EES, Evan
Hughes/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Allison McHenry/HOU/EES@EES, Larry Joe
Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Wanda Curry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Tribolet/Corp/Enron@Enron, David Gorte/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Springs SWAP Confirmations
From a Credit perspective, I informed Allison that credit provisions are not
required for these particular deals since I learned of the trades 2 days ago
(after the deals had been executed without our approval upfront). Credit
believes it does not make sense to execute stand alone financial deals.
These deals should be executed as amendments to the pricing component of the
physical contracts (i.e., a restructuring). This process would mitigate the
operational, credit and legal risks of this proposed business. My
understanding of the business strategy of EES is to enter into financial
transactions to hedge the portfolio, not to execute financial trades with end
users. Please advise if the legal position is changing.
Assuming we are unable to achieve the aforementioned solution, these deals
raise more significant issues regarding support and control of new business
endeavors for EES which already has significant infrastructure and control
issues. It raises issues to be resolved on:
Credit approval and monitoring
Credit provisions
Legal support in EES with financial and ISDA experience
Netting issues and additional credit risk from having multiple masters with
our clients (physical and financial)
Execution of masters post trade execution
Capturing and monitoring these OTC financial trades separate from financial
settlements of physical trades
Managing portfolio position risk
Operational issues capturing and properly valuing the trades
Operational support for confirmations and ensuring timely execution
In short, we need to establish processes to support this business. I will
set up a meeting with relevant parties to discuss further.
In respect to the attached confirmations for Springs, additional questions
should be raised with regard to operational/billing and legal implications
for consolidated billing of financial and physical invoices. This has been
specified in the payment date. Is EES capable of accomplishing this
operationally today? Doesn't this raise legal issues of consolidated billing
and settlements under two different contracts which do not stipulate netting
(physical with financial)?
Regards
Molly
From: Tana Jones on 10/18/2000 12:37 PM
To: Allison McHenry/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Karen A Cordova/HOU/EES@EES, Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marianne
Castano/HOU/EES@EES, Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Smith/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Re: Springs SWAP Confirmations
I'm sure you all know this by now, by Molly Harris had told me this deal does
not need any additonal credit terms added.
Allison McHenry@EES
10/17/2000 05:35 PM
To: Marianne Castano/HOU/EES@EES, Karen A Cordova/HOU/EES@EES, Paul
Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: molly.harris@enron.com, Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Springs SWAP Confirmations
Attached are the most current versions of the Springs SWAP Confirmations,
with changes suggested by Joe Hunter, and Annex A. Molly advised us not to
send the confirmations noting Credit Provisions would follow. Tana has
offered to help us draft the Credit attachment if we give her the details.
Again, I am turning my file over to Karen Cordova while I am on vacation, and
the confirmations are located under J:\Legal\SWAPs\Sales. Thanks and see you
on the 25th. |
kean-s/all_documents/5649. | 4503628.1075847623984.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Mon, 5 Mar 2001 08:02:00 -0800 (PST) | paula.rieker@enron.com | steven.kean@enron.com | Blockbuster media statement Steve - Mark asked me to forward this message I received from Ed Smida
(Blockbuster team). Paula
---------------------- Forwarded by Paula Rieker/Corp/Enron on 03/05/2001
04:00 PM ---------------------------
From: Ed Smida@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS on 03/04/2001 01:30 PM
To: Paula Rieker/Corp/Enron@Enron, Paula Rieker/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Blockbuster media statement
FYI
----- Forwarded by Ed Smida/Enron Communications on 03/04/01 01:29 PM -----
Kelly Kimberly
03/02/01 11:48 AM
To: David Cox/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Richard
DiMichele/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Frank Bay/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Ed Smida/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Kristina Mordaunt/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Ken Rice/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Kevin Hannon/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
cc:
Subject: Blockbuster media statement
Attached are three versions of standby statements on our Blockbuster contract
and sets of questions and answers, albeit with many missing answers. NONE OF
THESE IS A NEWS RELEASE TO PROACTIVELY ISSUE. THEY ARE TO USE ONLY IF
ASKED. The statements are:
1. For use immediately, should someone ask about contract status. It is
basically a "discussions are confidential" statement.
2. If word of our renegotiations is too broadly leaked, we may have to
consider a different statement so we're not put on the defensive.
3. If and when we cancel the contract. It would be preferable to offer a
joint, amiable statement with BB so we don't go to war in the media, but
this statement assumes that we'd have our own.
We need to deal with versions 1 and 2 shortly since Blockbuster continues to
make comments (like at the Kagan conference this week, where Antioco said we
won't extend the trial due to small movie selection.)
And we need to think about responses to the types of questions that we expect
to receive. Please send me your comments by early next week. |
fossum-d/all_documents/29. | 31174932.1075842422589.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Tue, 4 Jan 2000 04:11:00 -0800 (PST) | drew.fossum@enron.com | susan.scott@enron.com | Re: More on El Paso Protest of ENA Purchased Capacity I think you have a conflict for that one, but I understand you are available
for the March 14-5 one! DF
From: Susan Scott 01/04/2000 11:12 AM
To: Drew Fossum@ENRON
cc:
Subject: More on El Paso Protest of ENA Purchased Capacity
P.S. If it's OK with you I will plan to attend the Energy Seminar on Feb.
10-11 (see 2d half of Lorna's e-mail)
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 01/04/2000
11:12 AM ---------------------------
Lorna Brennan
01/04/2000 10:25 AM
To: Margaret Carson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rita Hartfield/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rockey
Storie/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Stephanie Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kent
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John Dushinske/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dave
Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mike McGowan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery
Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Christine Stokes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lee
Huber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: More on El Paso Protest of ENA Purchased Capacity
Marathon and Phillips Join Protest
Two more shippers have joined Amoco and Burlington Resources in their
joint protest against El Paso?s decision to sell to Enron 1.2 Bcf of excess
capacity from the San Juan Basin to California. Marathon and Phillips have
joined in the protest, attacking the entire deal as anti-competitive. The
protesters hope FERC will force El Paso to begin again with capacity
assignments. Amoco and Burlington had already protested the deal two weeks
ago at FERC, when they claimed the sale would violate El Paso?s rate case
settlement and tariff. The shippers argue that El Paso was trying to sell
part of that primary firm capacity at delivery points other than
PG&E/Topock), which the settlement prohibits. The settlement was intended to
protect PG&E and allow it to access service. If this capacity is delivered at
other points such as SoCal/Topock, it could add to the glut at that point,
the protesters argued. El Paso and Enron stand to gain if the basis
differential between the San Juan Basin and California remains large.
Marathon and Phillips say that Enron and El Paso can manipulate that basis
differential because between them and their affiliates they control all the
excess capacity from the San Juan Basin to California.
______________________________________________________________________
Energy Seminars
New 2000 Dates!
San Francisco
February 10-11
Miami Beach
February 29-March 1
Houston
March 14-15
Stay after for the Houston Energy Expo!
Denver
April 12-13
Come early for GasMart/Power 2000!
Houston
May 9-10
Other seminars include:
* Gas Contracts from A to Z: Level 100 & 202
* Natural Gas
* Electricity 101
* Retail Energy Marketing 101
* Gas Processing Contracts & Negotiations
* Basis Trading & Hedging in Electric Power
* Basis Trading & Hedging with Natural Gas
* Petroleum Products Hedging & Risk Management
* And more
Seminars are available for in-house sessions also!
For More Information:
Visit at <A HREF="http://www.energyseminars.com/">http://www.energyseminars.co
m</A>
Call 281.362.7979
email:registrar@energyseminars.com
______________________________________________________________________
Speculators Reduce Long Ratio
Speculators have reduced the size of their bets on rising NYMEX crude oil
futures during the two weeks ending last year. Speculator long positions now
outnumber short positions by 1.4 to 1 compared with a ratio of 2.9 to 1 two
weeks earlier and 3.8 to 1 four weeks earlier. Prices peaked at a
post-Gulf-War high of $27.15 a barrel November 22nd and ended the year at
$25.60. Long positions in crude oil futures on the NYMEX held by hedge funds
and large speculators were 44,233 on December 28th, little changed from
44,693 on December 14th, according to the CFTC. Speculator short positions
doubled, though, to 31,868 from 15,364. Speculators also became less bullish
about both gasoline and heating oil as their short positions increased much
more than the long positions did during the two-week period. The ratio of
longs to shorts in gasoline fell to about 3-to-2 from 20-to-1. For natural
gas, speculators increased their overall bet that gas prices would fall. They
had placed bets for rising gas prices from April until mid-November, when a
lack of severe cold weather demand pulled prices down from a two-year high.
The following table shows the changes in speculator positions for crude oil,
heating oil, gasoline and natural gas futures.
Contract Date Long Short L - S
Crude 12/28 44,233 31,868 12,365
Crude 12/14 44,693 15,364 29,329
HO 12/28 13,632 11,146 2,486
HO 12/14 9,717 4,372 5,345
Gasoline 12/28 13,115 7,950 5,165
Gasoline 12/14 11,908 585 11,323
NG 12/28 14,879 24,355 (9,476)
NG 12/14 12,779 19,925 (7,146)
_____________________________________________________________
FOR TIMELY INSIGHTS INTO NORTH AMERICAN GAS MARKET ISSUES
From One of North America?s Leading Energy Consultants
What We Offer:
Comprehensive advice on critical North American gas industry issues and
developments unbiased opinions on complex natural gas industry issues,
informed by an understanding of your business challenges early reporting on
important trends, strong competitive intelligence clearly written, focused
research.
Ziff Energy?s North American Gas Strategies Retainer Service - Join other
producers, pipelines, marketers, LDCs, and end-users from Canada and the U.S.
who are our retainer clients.
As a Retainer Client You Receive:
Bi-annual executive briefings customized to focus on your issues insightful
and high quality research reports - at least one report per month access to
senior consultants.
Custom Consulting:
Our experienced staff in Calgary and Houston understand the current strategic
issues that are affecting the North American gas industry today. Our
strategic gas consulting features strong objective analysis, and our
significant industry experience. Ziff Energy performs consulting work in a
variety of areas including markets, transportation, supply, storage and
mid-stream. We have the experience and the capability to integrate these
areas to address your needs.
In business since 1982, Ziff Energy has grown to become one of North
America?s leading energy consultants. With our large U.S. producer and
pipeline client base, Ziff Energy offers strong supply intelligence on the
U.S. Gulf of Mexico and onshore U.S. gas basins. With 50+ staff in our
Calgary and Houston offices, we are available to meet your strategic
information needs.
For more information about Ziff Energy?s Retainer Service
and consulting areas where we can be of assistance, contact Jim Oosterbaan,
V.P. Gas Services at (403) 234-4279 or joosterbaan@ziffenergy.com.
<A HREF="www.ziffenergy.com/nagsconference">www.ziffenergy.com/nagsconference<
/A>
______________________________________________________________________
Statoil Sells E&P Business to Equitable
Equitable Resources, has acquired Statoil Energy?s Appalachian Basin Gas
Exploration and Production subsidiaries, Eastern States Exploration Company
and Eastern States Oil and Gas for $630 million. The transaction is expected
to close in February. The sale includes natural gas reserves totaling
approximately 1.1 Tcf, 6,500 production wells, and 4,000 miles of pipeline
network in Kentucky, West Virginia, Pennsylvania and Ohio. Sale of the
exploration and production business is the first step in The Statoil Group?s
overall plan of complete divestment of Statoil Energy. Statoil Energy?s
remaining businesses, power generation, energy marketing and trading, will
be offered for sale in a separate process starting later this month. The
divestment plan is part of Statoil?s overall restructuring program to
concentrate on its core business activities: exploration and production in
Norway and other selected areas of the world; the European natural gas and
energy business; crude oil trading, refining and marketing; and
petrochemicals. Equitable?s market capitalization is $1.1 billion.
______________________________________________________________________
TAGE
The Austin Group Energy
Executive Search Consultants
pj@austingrp.com - <A HREF="http://www.austingrp.com">www.austingrp.com</A>
Phone (281) 497-8595 - Fax (281) 597-0099
______________________________________________________________________
EPRI Launches Customized Technical Support Services Subsidiary
A new subsidiary of the Electric Power Research Institute will offer
customized technical support services to both members and non-members of its
research program. EPRIsolutions is a for-profit subsidiary created to hasten
the application of EPRI technologies already developed through decades of
collaborative research. EPRIsolutions will work directly with our customers
to select, install and support the EPRI technologies most suitable for their
particular needs. Many of the services offered will be performed by the staff
of EPRI?s Technology Application Centers located throughout the US. For
example, the Engineering and Test Centers in Lenox, Mass. and Haslet, Tex.
can provide audits of utility power delivery systems to identify weaknesses
before they lead to outages. The Maintenance and Diagnostics Center in
Charlotte, N.C. can help customers save on the cost of operating and
maintaining their fossil-fired power plants. As an example of how such
integrated services will be offered, EPRIsolutions can help customers adapt
and install the powerful, sophisticated software packages now available for
load forecasting, environmental risk assessment, and retail market
management. In some cases, EPRIsolutions will go one step further by acting
as an application service provider for companies that want to outsource
data-intensive operations. The first such ASP activity will be on-line
monitoring and diagnosis of water chemistry for several nuclear power plants.
EPRIsolutions is being formed through the merger of two existing
subsidiaries, EPRICSG and EPRIGEN, which were created to allow EPRI to
conduct proprietary R&D on behalf of individual funders, who would retain
rights to the intellectual property involved. In addition to continuing this
activity, EPRIsolutions takes on the function of providing customized
technology application and consulting services. Such private-benefit work
lies beyond the scope of EPRI's tax-exempt, collaborative research mission
and thus requires the use of a taxable subsidiary.
______________________________________________________________________
HEAD?S UP? PRICES DOWN!
Natural gas prices have fallen to $2.40/MMBtu from $3.20/MMBtu just last
month. Storage injections still outweigh storage withdrawals. Where will
prices go? Depends on the weather. If it is warm in Houston and New York City
over the Thanksgiving holidays, will prices continue to head south? Under
those conditions, they have since 1993. Call it ?Rader?s Stupid Frozen Turkey
Theory? or call it storage fundamentals, but be prepared in case this silly
theory comes true one more year. For an in-depth, wellhead to burnertip study
of the natural gas industry, following is the winter schedule for the
original Natural Gas 101? training courses. Or call to set up an in-house
course at your convenience.
NATURAL GAS 1010 Schedule
2nd Week Jan - Houston, TX
Early Feb - Call for Exact dates
Early Mar - Houston, TX
April 19 - New Orleans, LA
Speaking at EEI National Accounts
Natural Gas 101 is a registered trademark of Rader Energy Consultants.
Contact: Linda K. Rader, Rader Energy Consultants
P.O. Box 27391, Houston, TX 77227-7391
(713) 621-0808 or (713) 993-9325, ext. 161
natgas101@att.net
______________________________________________________________________
Oxy and EOG Swap Properties
Occidental Petroleum and EOG Resources have exchanged oil and natural gas
fields to cut costs and boost production. Oxy received fields in California
that produce about 12 MMcf per day and mineral rights to more than 700,000
acres of land in the state. It also received properties in the western Gulf
that produce 26 MMcfe per day, adjacent to fields Oxy already owns. EOG
received properties in eastern Texas that are next to fields it owns and
which produce 33 MMcf per day and 3,000 barrels of oil a day. It also
acquired exploration rights on 312,000 acres in the Oklahoma panhandle.
_____________________________________________________________________
Houston Energy Expo GasMart/Power2000
Are you planning to attend the Houston Energy Expo or GasMart/Power2000?
Today?s hot issues: Deregulation, Gridlock, Gas Supply & Power Demand,
Merchant Plants, Fossil Fuels, Mergers and Aquisitions. Are you reacting to
the changes throughout your industry? Or, are you acting strategically &
decisively through integration of goals and objectives? We offer innovative
experiences, transformations and integrated marketing solutions for your next
tradeshow.
For a free "Tradeshow Timeline & Exhibit Staffing Strategy Guide"
call, fax or e-mail us today.
Attn: Brent P. Sells
Mail to: bsells@o-group.com
Phone: 800-725-8347 Ext. 121
Fax: 713-462-8347
25 years Domestically and Internationally
For more information regarding the Houston Energy Expo,
please visit the NESA website at <A HREF="http://www.nesanet.org">www.nesanet.
org</A>
For more information about attending, exhibiting, advertising, or sponsorship
at GasMart/Power2000, please visit our website at <A
HREF="http://www.gasmart.com">www.gasmart.com</A>
______________________________________________________________________
Calpine Buys Reserves from Vintage
Calpine has acquired 90 Bcf of natural gas reserves from Vintage
Petroleum for $71.5 million, becoming the largest gas producer in
California?s Sacramento Valley. Calpine bought the remaining 58% interest in
the Rio Vista field that it did not already own, along with some exploration
rights. It received the 42% stake when it acquired Sheridan Energy last
November for $128 million. Calpine plans to purchasing natural gas fields and
pipelines so it can provide fuel for its natural gas powered generators at
lower costs. Calpine plans to expand its electric generation businesses in
California, Texas, Arizona and Nevada along with the Southeast and Northeast.
It operates power plants that can generate 3,400 MW.
.
Callon Natural Gas Blowout
Callon Petroleum had a natural gas blowout while drilling a test well in
the Gulf of Mexico and a fire is burning from a portion of the well. There
were no injuries at the at South Marsh Island Block 261 well, about 60 miles
south of Lafayette, Louisiana. The fire is burning from a portion of the well
casing about 20 feet above sea level. Wild Well Control, a well-blowout
specialty company, is making preparations to bring the well under control.
Please Welcome Our Advertisers by Visiting These Websites!
<A HREF="www.nesanet.org">www.nesanet.org</A>
<A HREF="http://www.gasmart.com">www.gasmart.com</A>
<A HREF="http://www.austingrp.com">www.austingrp.com</A>
<A HREF="http://www.energy.com/ebid">www.energy.com/ebid</A>
<A HREF="www.ziffenergy.com/nagsconference">www.ziffenergy.com/nagsconference<
/A>
Financial Summary
The TSE 300 rose 7.68 points to 8413.75
The CRB Index is 204.27
The US Dollar retreated 1.65 points to 100..29
The Dow lost 140.23 points to 11356.89
The S&P 500 decreased 14.08 points to 1455.17
The Nasdaq was up 61.40 points to 4130.71
February NYMEX Crude Oil is 25.60
Canadian-U.S. Exchange fell .0074 to 1.4433
Enerfax Daily is the North America's gas and power information source. It
is sent to you free of charge. Enerfax Daily may be copied and redistributed
in its entirety to all interested energy professionals. Please call
281/583-7937, or e-mail us at enerfax1@aol.com with the e-mail addresses of
other energy professionals that would like to be added to Enerfax Daily's
growing distribution list of thousands of energy professionals in the U.S.
and Canada, or to be removed. The information contained herein was obtained
from sources which Enerfax Daily believes to be reliable, but does not
guarantee its accuracy.
Your support of our advertisers is greatly appreciated and will keep
Enerfax Daily free. Thank you. Your comments are welcome. |
beck-s/sent_items/353. | 13265153.1075858755510.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Wed, 10 Oct 2001 16:21:31 -0700 (PDT) | sally.beck@enron.com | tina.spiller@enron.com | RE: October 12 ENW Meeting That would be great if you have time. If you run out of time, we can wing =
it in lavendar. Thanks. --Sally=20
-----Original Message-----
From: =09Spiller, Tina =20
Sent:=09Wednesday, October 10, 2001 1:53 PM
To:=09Beck, Sally
Subject:=09RE: October 12 ENW Meeting
Sally,
On the presentation, I noticed that the "Commodity" in CommodityLogic didn'=
t show up on the slides because it was a very light lavender. Do you want =
me to get that fixed before Friday?
Tina
-----Original Message-----
From: =09Beck, Sally =20
Sent:=09Wednesday, October 10, 2001 12:35 PM
To:=09Adams, Jacqueline P.; Allwein, Robert; Arteaga, Airam; Baker, Natalie=
; Benbow, Troy; Boudreaux, Shanna; Brady, Kevin; Brewer, Stacey J.; Calcagn=
o, Suzanne; Carter, Tamara; Chang, Bonnie; Christiansen, Suzanne; Collins, =
Joann; Dempsey, Wes; Farmer, Daren J.; Felling, Amy; Fletcher, Brenda H.; F=
ranklin, Mary Theresa; Garcia, Clarissa; Gillespie, Steve; Gilmore, Tammy; =
Groenewold, Shannon; Halstead, Lia; Haynes, Daniel; Hiatt, Wendy; Homco, Me=
redith; Jackson, Brandee; Jaquet, Tammy; Kinsey, Lisa; Lakho, Shahnaz; Lama=
drid, Victor; Lenart, Kirk; Lisk, Daniel; Loocke, Kelly; Mendel, Shelly; Mo=
linaro, Jeffrey; Olinger, Kimberly S.; Olsen, Michael; Ordway, Chris; Pende=
rgrass, Cora; Pinion, Richard; Prudenti, Dan; Ramirez, Robert; Saldana, Ale=
x; Sanchez, Christina; Schrab, Mark L.; Shim, Elizabeth; Smith, George; Smi=
th, Joseph; Spiegelhauer, Walter; Straight, Margie; Sullivan, Patti; Supert=
y, Robert; Sutherland, Jan; Trofholz, Lisa; Villarreal, Jesse; Webb, Elizab=
eth; Wesneske, Brian; White, Jessica; Williams, Jason (Trading); Wolfe, Jas=
on; Wood, Tracy; Wukasch, Jeanne
Cc:=09Pickering, Mark; Piper, Greg; Costello, Lisa; Spiller, Tina; Valdez, =
Christina; Hall, Bob M
Subject:=09October 12 ENW Meeting
I realize that the timing of the Enron Net Works All Employee Meeting last =
Friday made it difficult for the Gas Logistics Team to attend. For future =
all-employee events within ENW, we will try to schedule times that work bes=
t for all employees. I didn't want you to be left out in this case, so I h=
ave worked with Bob Superty to set up another meeting for the Logistics tea=
m so that we can share with you the information that was covered last Frida=
y. I hope that you will be able to join me for this second meeting. We ha=
ve two videos that were made for the all-employee meeting that I think you =
will enjoy seeing. We will also review the slides that were used in the di=
scussions and have time for questions and answers. =20
=09=09=09ENW All-Logistics Meeting
=09=09=09Friday, October 12
=09=09=092:00 to 3:00 PM
=09=09=09ECN 5 C-2
Sally W. Beck
Chief Operating Officer
Enron Net Works, LLC
Phone - 713.853.5926
Fax - 713.345.8100
sally.beck@enron.com |
fischer-m/all_documents/154. | 28497981.1075840444639.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Mon, 22 Apr 2002 10:02:00 -0700 (PDT) | mark.walker@enron.com | jeff.duff@enron.com, mark.fisher@enron.com, hollis.kimbrough@enron.com | Repair/Maintenance counter behavior ---------------------- Forwarded by Mark V Walker/EWC/Enron on 04/22/2002=
=20
05:16 PM ---------------------------
Garth Ripton
04/22/2002 07:09 AM
To: Paul Landers/EWC/Enron@Enron
cc: Mark V Walker/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Cousineau/EWC/Enron@ENRON=20
Subject: Repair/Maintenance counter behavior
Hi Paul,
Sorry I didn=01,t get back to you after you called on Friday. I went over t=
he=20
Bachmann code over the weekend (and, today, confirmed the timer behavior wi=
th=20
Gert). If the turbine is in "maintenance" for any reason such as the physic=
al=20
maintenance switch is on or any manual mode is active due to:
1. Hydraulic service switch on (status 47)
2. Rotor lock engaged (status 108)
3. Generator fan service switch on (status 148)
4. Axle box maintenance switch on- battery power disconnected from pitch=20
motors (status 164)
5. Hub control box switch is in manual position (status 165)
6. Release brake button in the top-box is activated (status 171)
7. Manual pitch setting is active (status 185)
8. Manual generator speed setting is commanded (status 186)
9. Manual torque setting is commanded (status 187)
10. Manual disconnection from the power grid (status 188)
11. Manual yaw operation is commanded (status 189)
12. Manual generator fan operation is commanded (status 191)
then the maintenance timer will increment. If the manual repair switch is s=
et=20
while the maintenance mode is active then the repair timer will increment=
=20
(and the maintenance timer will stop incrementing). This should answer Mark=
=20
Walkers concern that the maintenance/repair switch will always take=20
precedence over any manual mode command.
Also note that there should be a correction to the list that Erik was=20
publishing for which timers are incremented during various fault conditions=
.=20
Fault 165 increments "maintenance time" not "system OK" time. |
hain-m/discussion_threads/21. | 13437434.1075860382672.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Tue, 20 Jun 2000 22:45:00 -0700 (PDT) | sdleonard@earthlink.net | nwrto@pplmt.com, ambarnes@bpa.gov, sberman@hewn.com, kcarlson@do.usbr.gov, | Initial E-mail Communication - Subgroup Working on GIA, LIA, Etc. Good morning, everyone!
I am sorry it has taken me so long to contact you.
This e-mail is intended to get things rolling for the RTO West Legal
Subgroup working on the Generation Integration and Load Integration
Agreements, as well as Security Coordination and Scheduling Coordinator
Agreements if necessary.
First, for your reference I have attached the following documents:
(1) a list of participants in our subgroup;
(2) the original IndeGO Generation Integration Agreement ("GIA"); and
(3) the original IndeGO Load Integration Agreement ("LIA").
If you know of anyone who would like to be included in this subgroup that
does not appear on the attached participants list, please let me know. I
will also post each of the attached documents on the RTO West website, at
the link on the Legal Work Group page set up for our subgroup.
Second, I would like to share some initial feedback I have received with
respect to our assigned tasks:
(A) Concerning the Generation GIA, I have the following initial feedback:
- Carl Imparato has expressed strong concern about existing provisions in
the GIA designed to address instances when hydro generation facility
operators are forced to move water through turbines, rather than spill it,
to avoid dissolved gas super-saturation problems;
- James Mosher has expressed concern that the GIA as currently drafted does
not adequately address issues unique to Qualifying Facilities, and would
like us to work on that; and
- Steve Larson of BPA has contacted me to let me know that BPA has developed
some initial comments on the GIA (and LIA), but I have not yet had a chance
to have a conversation with BPA representatives about what those comments
are. I hope to do that sometime tomorrow (Thursday, June 22) if possible.
(B) I have talked with John Boucher, who leads the Implementation Work
Group, and he says that the initial consensus within the Implementation Work
Group is that we should begin with the approach that security coordination
for RTO West will be accomplished through the existing organization set up
in the Northwest to perform security coordination (Pacific Northwest
Security Coordinator or "PNSC," which is a Washington non-profit
corporation); and
(C) John Boucher says that the initial thinking in the Implementation Work
Group about scheduling coordinators as that we should assume that we will
have scheduling coordinators for RTO West and therefore will need to develop
a scheduling coordinator agreement. With that in mind, I have also attached
to this e-mail an e-mail message from Barney Speckman on this topic.
Barney's e-mail describes input he has received from Carl Imparato
concerning areas in the West that have already developed scheduling
coordinator agreements, and includes an e-mail from Carl with sample
documents. I will also post these on the RTO West website as soon as
possible, along with the basic form of Security Coordination Agreement
developed for PNSC.
I think it might be useful to plan to meet or have a telephone conference
call during the week of July 10 (early in the week, if possible) to discuss
our various tasks and strategies for accomplishing them. If most of you are
going to be at the Legal Work Group meeting on June 27, that might be a good
opportunity to try to identify a time and date that works for most subgroup
members and to decide whether to meet in person or by telephone conference.
I also hope to make initial "cosmetic" changes to the GIA and LIA very soon,
and will put the initial revised versions of those documents on the website
as soon as they are ready.
In the meantime, if anyone else has some input they would like to offer with
respect to the issues and documents assigned to our subgroup, you are
welcome to contact me by e-mail or telephone.
Thank you very much.
Sarah Dennison-Leonard
Krogh & Leonard
506 SW Sixth Avenue, Suite 750
Portland, OR 97204-1533
Office: (503) 219-9649
Fax: (503) 224-1895
E-mail: sdleonard@earthlink.net
- Legal WG - GIA&LIA Subgroup List June 21 2000.doc.rtf
- IndeGO Generation Integration Agreement.doc
- IndeGO Load Integration Agreement.doc
Received: from imo-r20.mx.aol.com (imo-r20.mx.aol.com [152.163.225.162]) by
kestrel.prod.itd.earthlink.net (8.9.3-EL_1_3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA12999
for <sdleonard@earthlink.net>; Mon, 12 Jun 2000 05:53:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bmspeckman@aol.com
Received: from Bmspeckman@aol.com by imo-r20.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v27.10.) id
o.4e.6c3cb91 (8392); Mon, 12 Jun 2000 08:52:42 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4e.6c3cb91.2676371a@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 08:52:42 EDT
Subject: Fwd: NWRTO-Scheduling Coordinator Concept
To: JBoucher@kemaconsulting.com, dhackett@kemaconsulting.com,
kristiwallis@sprintmail.com, sdleonard@earthlink.net, ekrogh@sev.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="part1_4e.6c3cb91.2676371a_boundary"
X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 104
X-UIDL: 9275d7f5920d1155c83013f628204bbf
Attached is a couple of documents that Carl Imparato has sent me on the
concept of the Scheduling Coordinator(SC) in other ISOs/RTOs.The SC is the
business entity in some areas which buys transmission service, schedules
transactions, pays for congestion and imbalances and other RTO/ISO
charges(A/S, losses and unaccounted for energy etc.). It seems important to
discuss this and develop a working model for the various workgroups to all be
using. I will plan to discuss it at my A/S mtg on Tues.
What do you think is the best way to proceed? I do agree with Carl that it is
probably an RRG issue ultimately. In the near term it could be something the
work groups agree to use as a working assumption then get it to RRG later
or we could take it to the RRG this week.
Barney Speckman
RTO West KEMA Team
Portland Office Phone 503-258-0475
RTO West Offices
5933 NE Win Sivers Drive
Portland, Oregon
BMS Consulting
2130 Belford Drive
Walnut Creek, Calif. 94598
925-287-0365 (Walnut Creek Phone and Fax)
Return-Path: <cfi1@tca-us.com>
Received: from rly-zb01.mx.aol.com (rly-zb01.mail.aol.com [172.31.41.1]) by
air-zb05.mail.aol.com (v74.10) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Jun 2000 01:58:49 -0400
Received: from polaris.shore.net (polaris.shore.net [207.244.124.105]) by
rly-zb01.mx.aol.com (v74.16) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Jun 2000 01:58:14 -0400
Received: from pppa5-resaleoakland1-2r1016.saturn.bbn.com (default)
[4.16.32.64] by polaris.shore.net with smtp (Exim) id 131NDk-00076f-00; Mon,
12 Jun 2000 01:57:12 -0400
Message-ID: <39447BE9.53A8@tca-us.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2000 22:58:01 -0700
From: Carl Imparato <cfi1@tca-us.com>
Reply-To: cfi1@tca-us.com
Organization: Tabors, Caramanis & Associates
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (Win95; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bmspeckman@aol.com, jpm@aelaw.com, mpa@aelaw.com, kewh@dynegy.com,
paul.kaufman@enron.com, dperrino@apx.com, rlewis@apx.com, ed@apx.com
CC: dave.robertson@gt.pge.com, scott.miller@gen.pge.com,
sean.crandall@enron.com
Subject: NWRTO-Scheduling Coordinator Concept
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------700255F0224D"
Barney:
When IndeGO was drafted several years ago, little thought was given to
explicitly creating the concept of "Scheduling Coordinator." As you are
aware from the California experience, the concept is very important
because it defines the roles and duties of the entity that is
responsible for handling the needs of unbundled retail customers, as
well as wholesale customers, on a non-discriminatory basis.
Attached are two documents. The first document provides an overview of
the SC concept as well as an overview of what transmission access is
really all about in a one-part tariff. The document is adapted from the
Mountain West ISA tariff and the Desert STAR draft tariff.
The second document is a recent version (not the most current, but in my
opinion, the most rational) of the Desert STAR Scheduling Coordinator
document. The DSTAR document built on the Mountain West ISA document,
which in turn built on the California foundation. (I also note that the
ERCOT model also includes a Scheduling Coordinator concept, although in
ERCOT the entities are called QSEs - Qualified Scheduling Entities.)
I believe that the SC concept is a very important concept for NWRTO to
discuss and adopt. It is one of the cornerstones (along with the FTR
model) of the decentralized coordination model which I believe NWRTO
plans to consider.
I do not know which of the NWRTO workgroups would be the lead on the
concept (although it is very well fleshed out and probably needs little,
if any, additional work). Certainly, it is important for the Congestion
Management, Ancillary Services and Implementation workgroups to
understand the concept; and it is equally important for the Legal group
and the RRG to adopt the concept since the contractual relationships
between the RTO and grid users are through the Scheduling Coordinator.
I would appreciate your discussing this issue with project management
and forwarding the attached documents to the proper workgroups. I will
also be available to discuss this at the RRG this Thursday.
Thank you,
Carl Imparato
- NWRTOSch.zip |
beck-s/sent/598. | 28260627.1075855910591.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Tue, 8 Feb 2000 07:19:00 -0800 (PST) | sally.beck@enron.com | patti.thompson@enron.com | from Katherine Corbally Please print a color copy of this for me. Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 02/08/2000 03:13 PM
---------------------------
Jean Spitzner@ENRON
02/08/2000 03:05 PM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: from Katherine Corbally |
germany-c/sent_items/682. | 23493887.1075840524734.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Fri, 1 Mar 2002 06:45:53 -0800 (PST) | chris.germany@enron.com | kay.mann@enron.com | FW: Dominion prepay for City of Tallahassee deal for March 2002 Ed is asking me if we followed up or if we need to follow up. Please let me know. I am also going to send you an email of the letter we sent to Tallahassee.
-----Original Message-----
From: McMichael Jr., Ed
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 6:02 PM
To: Germany, Chris; Mann, Kay
Cc: Polsky, Phil; Boyt, Eric; Barbe, Robin
Subject: RE: Dominion prepay for City of Tallahassee deal for March 2002
Chris/Kay,
We need to make sure that COT is properly notified in accordance with the contract. Please confirm.
Thanks,
Ed
-----Original Message-----
From: Germany, Chris
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 3:40 PM
To: Sewell, Doug; Dhont, Margaret; Hamic, Priscilla
Cc: Polsky, Phil; Boyt, Eric; McMichael Jr., Ed; Barbe, Robin
Subject: RE: Dominion prepay for City of Tallahassee deal for March 2002
I just went over the March prepayment with David Walker (405-749-5240) at Dominion. On Thursday, ENA will wire $280,306.00 to Dominion. The Force Majeure event has ended and Dominion will resume deliveries effective 2/26/02. We are assuming Dominion did not deliver any gas for Feb 8th through Feb 25th, 18 days. Following are my calculations
Prepay for March 2002 10,000 dth per day x 31 days x $2.1562 = $668,422.00
Non deliveries for Feb 2002 10,000 dth per day x 18 days x $2.1562 = ($388,116.00)
Amount to wire on 2/28/02 ==> $280,306.00
There may have been some gas flow on Feb 8th, but David will let us know about that later.
Doug, do I need to prepare a new Cash Use Approval Request form?
-----Original Message-----
From: Germany, Chris
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 10:58 AM
To: Sewell, Doug; Dhont, Margaret; Hamic, Priscilla
Cc: Polsky, Phil; Boyt, Eric; McMichael Jr., Ed; Barbe, Robin
Subject: Dominion prepay for City of Tallahassee deal for March 2002
I'm requesting the prepay for Dominion for March 2002. I printed out the request, signed it, and gave it to Doug. I just want everyone to be aware of what is happening with Dominion. Dominion is still not delivering the gas to Tallahassee due to a Force Majeure event. We are expecting gas to flow any day, hopefully by the weekend.
Eric, I left a message for David Walker (405-749-5240) at Dominion to call me about the prepayment amount. Following are my calculations
Prepay for March 2002 10,000 dth per day x 31 days x $2.1562 = $668,422
Non deliveries for Feb 2002 10,000 dth per day x 14 days x $2.1562 = ($301,868)
Estimated payment due 2/28/02 $366,554
As of today Mops has been down from Feb 8th - 21st, 14 days. Mops may not come up until the weekend or early next week. I will adjust the prepayment as needed next week.
<< File: Dominion Prepay (1.29.02 for $603,736)_update.doc >> |
heard-m/sent_items/601. | 26884507.1075861915111.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Tue, 30 Oct 2001 11:41:28 -0800 (PST) | marie.heard@enron.com | debra.perlingiere@enron.com | FW: BP Master Netting Agreement Debra:
Please verify that Mr. Dixon's facts are accurate.
Thanks!
Marie
-----Original Message-----
From: "Dixon, Billy D" <billy.dixon@bp.com>@ENRON
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 1:09 PM
To: Heard, Marie
Cc: St. Clair, Carol; Jones, Tana
Subject: RE: BP Master Netting Agreement
Marie:
We don't show any trading contracts in existence with Vastar Gas Marketing,
Inc. All of Vastar Gas Marketing,Inc.'s contracts were assigned to Southern
Company Energy Marketing after BP acquired Vastar.
Do you have any information otherwise?
Very truly yours,
BILLY
Billy D. Dixon
Attorney
BP America Inc.
501 Westlake Park Blvd., Rm 16.166
Houston, Texas 77079
Direct 281/366-4745
Fax 281/366-5901
billy.dixon@bp.com
***IMPORTANT -- THIS EMAIL AND ANY ATTACHMENTS HERETO ARE ATTORNEY-CLIENT
AND/OR ATTORNEY WORK-PRODUCT PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL. If you have
received this email in error, do not under any circumstances read, forward,
copy, disseminate or save this email or any of its attachments. If you have
received this email in error, take the following actions: (1) reply to this
email indicating that you received this email in error, and (2) delete and
completely erase this email and its attachments from your computer and any
backup systems or "Deleted Items" folders.
-----Original Message-----
From: Heard, Marie [mailto:Marie.Heard@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 9:44 AM
To: billy.dixon@bp.com
Cc: St. Clair, Carol; Jones, Tana
Subject: BP Master Netting Agreement
Mr. Dixon:
Pursuant to Carol St. Clair's request, I am attaching our preliminary
list of the agreements to be under the BP Master Netting Agreement.
Since we don't own 100% of EOTT, any master netting agreement involving
EOTT will not be under this master netting agreement.
Please let us know if you have any questions or need anything else.
Marie Heard
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron North America Corp.
Phone: (713) 853-3907
Fax: (713) 646-3490
marie.heard@enron.com
<<BP Master Netting Agreement File
Index.doc>>
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
********************************************************************** |
hernandez-j/24_hr_power/16. | 30412238.1075855574613.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Thu, 21 Sep 2000 05:58:00 -0700 (PDT) | kayne.coulter@enron.com | jay.wills@enron.com, cyril.price@enron.com, john.kinser@enron.com, | Nerc Training I have made adjustments to the schedule concerning Nerc Training classes.
The class runs from 8 A.M. until 4 P.M.
Sample testing can be done the following week at your own pace.
Please check the schedule at M:/electric/24hr/misc/schedule
Everyone should be o.k.
Thanks
Kayne |
giron-d/inbox/155. | 27709697.1075840557793.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Mon, 7 Jan 2002 09:00:09 -0800 (PST) | kam.keiser@enron.com | m..love@enron.com, d..winfree@enron.com, scott.palmer@enron.com, | sitara mappings The sitara mapping table is saved in the Netco file named CurveMappings.xls
Check your regions and if you see any locations mapped to curves we won't be setting anymore, make a list of those and what the new mappings should be. Once the new database is set up we will get with Russ to have those changed over.
Thanks
KK |
germany-c/calendar/10. | 25941753.1075840503691.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Thu, 18 Apr 2002 11:41:57 -0700 (PDT) | heather.choate@enron.com | heather.choate@enron.com, fred.lagrasta@enron.com, w..muench@enron.com, | Updated: *RESCHEDULED [again]*Team Meeting w/ Ed McMichael The above meeting has been rescheduled for Monday, April 22, 2002 at the
designated time and place.
Thank you,
Heather S. Choate, CPS
Asst. to Ed McMichael
(713) 853, 3278 |
jones-t/sent/2064. | 7234799.1075847200254.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Mon, 9 Oct 2000 09:14:00 -0700 (PDT) | tana.jones@enron.com | susan.trevino@enron.com | Re: Meta-Calc Report I'm preparing for a presentation I have to give tomorrow. Once I'm done with
this I'll give you a call...
Susan D Trevino
10/09/2000 03:46 PM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Meta-Calc Report
Tana - I understand that a new product needs to be added to the Meta-Calc
Report. Please advise.
Thank you,
Susan Trevino
3-1462 |
hodge-j/inbox/276. | 25774457.1075852749721.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Mon, 15 Oct 2001 08:26:52 -0700 (PDT) | kimberly.bates@enron.com | chuck.ames@enron.com, f..brawner@enron.com, chris.germany@enron.com, | FW: Wedding Shower/Time/Date Changed -----Original Message-----
From: Saldana, Alex
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 10:26 AM
To: Allwein, Robert; Arteaga, Airam; Boudreaux, Shanna; Carter, Tamara; Collins, Joann; Garcia, Clarissa; Gillespie, Steve; Halstead, Lia; Homco, Meredith; Lamadrid, Victor; Loocke, Kelly; Ordway, Chris; Prudenti, Dan; Ramirez, Robert; Sanchez, Christina; Wood, Tracy
Cc: Superty, Robert; Jackson, Brandee; Choate, Heather; Bates, Kimberly
Subject: Wedding Shower/Time/Date Changed
(Kim please forward to your group)
Alex Saldana
Administrative Assistant
Enron Networks
(713) 345-7389 |
harris-s/deleted_items/122. | 22996337.1075858859140.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Fri, 19 Oct 2001 04:55:17 -0700 (PDT) | j..porter@enron.com | drew.fossum@enron.com, e-mail <.frank@enron.com>, steven.harris@enron.com, | FW: clarification of CPUC position re TW settlement Attached is a CPUC response to a couple clarifying questions I had asked. Greg
-----Original Message-----
From: Passamonti, Ida [mailto:imp@cpuc.ca.gov]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 6:59 PM
To: Porter, Gregory J.
Cc: 'kbedwards@gkrse-law.com'; 'thomas.burgess@ferc.fed.us'; 'michael.colteur@ferc.fed.us'; 'gsterling@hhlaw.com'
Subject: clarification of CPUC position re TW settlement |
kean-s/all_documents/184. | 29950846.1075846144508.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Sat, 4 Dec 1999 07:02:00 -0800 (PST) | edith.terry@enron.com | terence.thorn@enron.com, kelly.kimberly@enron.com | Collapse of WTO talks Terry:
I think I was alone among the energy services group in staying through the
bitter and surprising end of WTO. I was together with Rachel Thompson of the
OECD and services trade specialist Julian Arkell, who have been advising our
group from a European perspective. So I thought I would give you my account
of the final hours of the "Seattle Round." By the time you read this it will
have been covered in great detail by the world press, but as of Saturday
morning only the west coast papers seem to have gotten the full story, which
broke around 9:30 pm Seattle time, Friday night.
I went back to the convention center about 11 pm, and as I walked up the
block -- still cordoned off by riot police -- delegates were already
streaming out of the building. Emotions ranged from tired to disgusted to
dispirited. Inside, a final plenary session was underway led by WTO director
general Michael Moore and US host Charlene Barshefsky. I watched the final
moments of the plenary session on TV in the media center, where journalists
laughed as Moore made lame jokes about Seattle hospitality and vowed to
resist pressure to step down as DG. "I intend to fulfill my contract," Moore
said. "I have a background of fulfilling contracts in the labor movement."
This was a poor choice of language since it was probably the US-influenced
attempt to launch discussions on labor standards that killed the round more
than anything else. Following the plenary, Moore and Barshefsky held a press
conference followed by another by representatives from the European Union. I
sat in as an observer to the two press conferences, which lasted until just
after 1 am Saturday.
The collapse of the launch of the "Seattle round" is extremely significant.
For one thing, it means that there will be no Seattle round. Although Moore
has been charged to come up with suggestions about re-starting the process
beginning early next year, it is unlikely that either the political will or
interest to do so will be sufficient before the US election campaign blows
everything else off the calendar. Re-launching the round will depend very
much on the complexion of the next US Administration, how committed it is to
trade, how much it owes to labor, whether it can stand up to the
environmental and labor groups that helped to derail the launch. Past
experience suggests that it will take several years (three to four is
average) to organize another attempt IF there is strong political motivation.
The collapse seriously undermines US credibility in international economic
issues. There was a strong feeling that the Administration had played the WTO
meeting to domestic political interests, and overplayed its hand to the
extent of jeopardizing the structure of the negotiations. One European
journalist (Guy de Jonquiere, FT) asked Barshefsky what she thought about the
common view that this was a "terrible mess, the worst organized conference"
and that the sabotage was in part deliberate or at least that failure had
been seen as a political option by the US. Barshefsky angrily rejected the
question, and defended her failure on the grounds that "issues that had been
intractable remained intractable." Nonetheless, the question expressed a
general hostility towards the US as host organization, based perhaps partly
on the discomfort of delegates who were beaten up on their way into the
convention center, locked for hours on end in their hotels, and forced to
hide their WTO identification tags whenever they left streets belatedly
cordoned off for the event. Not to mention dodging protestors chaining
themselves to hotel doors, boarded up stores, and transportation difficulties
(several taxi companies went on strike on Tuesday and were thin the rest of
the week).
The failure of the Seattle round comes at a time when the other Bretton Woods
institutions -- the IMF and World Bank -- are under attack as well as the
WTO. All three have suffered from retrenchment of US funding, relentless
criticism by the US Congress, and waffling support from the Administration.
The Seattle fiasco will put more pressure on regional organizations, such as
the EU, NAFTA, FTAA, APEC, and ASEAN to continue to move towards
liberalization and give them more reasons to move into defensive modes. We
can expect to hear a lot in the next months about the possible fragmentation
of the global trading system into regional blocks, just as we did in the late
1980s when the Uruguay Round nearly collapsed. But a drift towards
regionalism may not be all bad. To the extent that regional organizations
themselves have a strong stake in keeping the global trading system open, or
at least in preserving access to major markets, they may provide the momentum
to continue work in some of the areas of interest to multinationals -- for
Enron, energy services, environment and trade, and regulatory harmonization.
Rachel Thompson, as an observer for the OECD, was in the so-called "green
room" where negotiations shifted on Friday afternoon after the attempt to
craft a ministerial declaration through working groups was abandoned. This
represented a return to a more traditional GATT/WTO mode of horsetrading "in
camera" or in a relatively small room, as opposed to the innovative but
failed US strategy of crafting a text in pieces through five working groups
(on agriculture, market access, implementation and rules, systemic and
"other" issues including competition policy, investment, and the
environment). The idea behind the working group structure was to open up the
negotiating process, particularly to developing countries, and make it more
democratic. Instead, it resulted in chaos. Rachel said that the green room
discussions fell apart about 8 pm Friday when it became evident that the
negotiators were "too far apart on too many issues." A crucial element, she
said, was the outrage felt by developing countries over Clinton's statements
on labor rights and sanctions, in an interview en route to Seattle. Rachel
described this as a political miscalculation similar to Clinton's bungling of
the China deal during the visit to the US of Chinese vice premier Zhu Rongji
last March, when he played
At a midnight press conference, US Trade Representative Charlene Barshefsky
defended the Administration's strategy, argued that the interruption to the
WTO process was merely temporary, and described all the agreements reached
prior to the breakdown as "frozen" and ready to move ahead once the round was
launched. Barshefsky described the collapse of the talks as a "timeout" along
the lines of previous occasions when GATT has floundered, as in 1982 (failure
of the US to launch a services negotiation) and 1990 (failure to bring
Uruguay Round to a conclusion as planned; the Uruguay Round ended finally in
1993). Barshefsky was immediately challenged by EU commissioner Pascal Lamy,
who said that the proposals submitted in Seattle were "dead" although some of
the ideas would live on.
"What I think happened -- this was the fourth in a series of this kind of
episode -- was that the delegations came, they proceeded to work
exceptionally hard and in good faith but were not quite willing to make
political decisions," Barshefsky said. Lamy agreed that the issues were
complex but added that the "posturing" of some of the actors helped block the
launch. He blamed the collapse partly on faulty procedure. "Two days ago
prospects seemed brighter [before the working groups were formed]. This is
something that we do have to reflect upon." But he went on to say that the
WTO itself was to blame for the problems. "The process has to be reassessed,
reinvigorated, refurbished and maybe rebuilt," Lamy said. "Efficiency and
transparency are common problems in modern institutions. The WTO does not
have the institutional strength, the culture, or procedures to do this right."
What happens next, and what are the implications for Enron's effort in energy
services?
First, nothing new will happen on energy services until a new round is
launched;
This, however, gives us time to work on definitional issues. If the round had
started as planned in March 2000, we might still be unprepared with arguments
to support the "broad" definition of energy services we have promoted
Third, we will have time to build a dialogue with the EU and Japan in
particular on energy services, and to cultivate programs similar to the APEC
work program on energy services in other regional organizations
Finally, although we have viewed the proposed APEC work program on energy
services as weak and a distraction from WTO work, this may turn out to be the
strongest available vehicle to work on basic issues of definition and best
practices
In terms of WTO itself, two streams of activity are possible, maybe three.
First, existing working groups will continue (separate from the drafting
committees that were set up this week). The most important of these is one on
domestic regulatory issues that is not time-specific, according to Julian
Arkell. Julian describes domestic regulation and regulatory harmonization as
the biggest future area of difficulty for WTO, and it is also one that is
directly relevant to Enron's interest in regulatory standardization in
electricity and natural gas regimes globally. The domestic regulatory working
group has started programs on transparency, "necessity," equivalency
(including harmonization), and international standards. Arcane as these
discussions may be, they have enormous ongoing importance for the rules based
global trading system.
A second possible stream is to push ahead with the so-called "built-in"
agenda on agriculture and services. Barshefsky seemed to be arguing that the
built-in agenda could go ahead regardless of the failure to launch a
comprehensive round. Rachel and Julian both felt this was dubious. In any
event, it does not help energy services because this was not among the
"built-in" service sectors.
A third possible stream would be separate negotiations to complete the
previous services round in 1994, along the lines of the 1997 information
technology agreement and proposed ITA Two. Theoretically, energy services
could be discussed or negotiated in terms of a reference paper indicating the
unique features of the sector and advancing the agenda on domestic
regulation. This also seems unlikely, given that the question of a broader
services round now overhangs any discussion in services.
On electronic commerce, we might expect to see some different viewpoints
along the lines of the basic split between Barshefsky and Lamy. However, Lamy
said in response to a question that "nothing has been agreed" on e-commerce.
"Nothing is agreed until everything is agreed. The followup is probably up to
the normal WTO process. Once that is settled, [the moratorium on e-commerce
taxation] wouldn't be a problem and we can take the issue rapidly."
I may find out more during the day depending on who is still left in Seattle.
The Coalition of Service Industries closed its room early this morning after
doing a terrific job in terms of informing its members and corralling
Administration officials to give briefings. We should take heart from CSI's
experience. It was formed in 1982 to get services on the agenda of the
Uruguay Round. It took four years to launch the round (in 1986) then another
eight years to get the first broad services agreement (in 1994). This was a
setback, but the meetings provided an opportunity to meet some new service
industry players, such as the brand new Japan Services Network (established
Oct. 15, 1999), a new services industry group in Hong Kong, and the European
Services Forum. Back to the drawing board, but the drawing board itself is
much bigger.
Cheers,
Edith Terry
Enron/from Seattle |
kaminski-v/deleted_items/165. | 17820972.1075840752617.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Thu, 24 Jan 2002 10:13:49 -0800 (PST) | info@pmaconference.com | j.kaminski@enron.com | Energy Derivatives/Electric Power Seminars =20
[IMAGE]=09 =09 =09
=09 Energy Derivatives/Electric Power Seminars=09 =09
=09Houston: February; Philadelphia: March =09 =09
=09=09[IMAGE]=09
=09 Successful people take the time they need to increase their knowle=
dge. For information on PGS Energy Training's upcoming seminars in downto=
wn Houston (in February) and in downtown Philadelphia (March), call 412-279=
-9298 or visit http:/ /www.pgsenergy.com/schedule.html Available seminar=
s include:1) Fundamentals of Energy Futures, Options & Derivatives2) Funda=
mentals of the Electric Power Industry3) Gas-to-Electricity Arbitrage & How=
to Maximize the Profitability of Electric Generation Assets4) Developing E=
ffective Risk Management Policies & Procedures (John Wengler)5) Fundamental=
s of Statistical Analysis (Dr. Ken Skinner)6) How to Value Electric Genera=
tion Assets as Real Options 7) Fundamentals of Value-at-Risk (Soli Forouza=
n) Save money by bringing a group of 4 or more. With a group rate, your cos=
t for a $1,295 seminar is reduced to $895 per attendee-- a savings of $1,=
600 from regular prices. The group price for the $695 programs is $495. Pl=
ease forward this to anyone who might benefit from a better understanding =
of energy derivatives, risk management, gas-to-electricity arbitrage, stat=
istics or electric power trading. John Adamiak, PGS Energy Training john@p=
gsenergy.com http://www.pgsenergy.com/schedule.html =09 =09
=09call us :: 412-279-9298=09[IMAGE]=09
=09=09 This email was sent to vince.j.kaminski@enron.com, at your request,=
by PowerMarketers.com . Visit our Subscription Center to edit your int=
erests or unsubscribe . View our privacy policy . Powered by Constant C=
ontact =09 |
donohoe-t/discussion_threads/114. | 21138302.1075856150759.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Mon, 20 Nov 2000 05:04:00 -0800 (PST) | patrice.mims@enron.com | tom.donohoe@enron.com | Exclusive Thanksgiving Sale Sneak Peek--and More! ---------------------- Forwarded by Patrice L Mims/HOU/ECT on 11/20/2000=20
12:58 PM ---------------------------
"eToys News for You" <newsforyou@etoys.rsvp0.net> on 11/20/2000 06:44:17 AM
Please respond to "eToys News for You" <newsforyou@etoysnews.etoys.com>
To: PMIMS@ENRON.COM
cc: =20
Subject: Exclusive Thanksgiving Sale Sneak Peek--and More!
Dear Patrice Thurston,
We know you=01,re busy this time of year--that's why eToys makes it easy to
shop for your holiday. Get an exclusive sneak peek at our Thanksgiving Sale
before it=01,s open to the public. Plus, find everything you need, from the=
=20
hottest
toys to gifts under $20 to =01&Big Gift=018 ideas.
Thanksgiving Sale Sneak Peek
You can only get to our Thanksgiving Sale sneak peek from this e-mail,
from now until Wednesday, Nov 22. Hundreds of toys are on sale and in
stock, just in time for the holidays.
Holiday Hot List
Great toys at great prices--you'll find the toys kids are talking about
on our Holiday Hot List.
Top Sellers for Boys
Top Sellers for Girls
See all Hot List.
Gifts Under $20
Terrific toys don't need to be expensive! Discover special treats for
kids of every age.
0-12 Months
1 Year
2 Years
3 Years
4 Years
=095 Years
=096 Years
=097 Years
=098 Years
=099-12 Years
=09
The Big Gift
What's the "Big Gift" going to be this holiday? Find something
wonderful and unexpected to fill the box they can't wait to open.
0-2 Years
3 Years
4 Years
5 Years
6 Years
=097 Years
=098 Years
=099-12 Years
=09Teen
=09
=09
Get $10 Off at gapkids.com or babygap.com
Make any purchase at eToys through December 11, and get $10 off
any $50 purchase at gapkids.com or babygap.com.
We look forward to making your holiday shopping easier!
Happy Holidays,
Jenny H.
eToys
Where great ideas come to you.
If you'd prefer not to receive these e-mail updates, please let us know, or
cut and paste the following link into your browser:
http://www.etoys.com/exec/subscribe?home=3Dunsub&email_address=3DPMIMS@ENRO=
N.COM |
kaminski-v/consultants/17. | 21699245.1075840780467.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Sat, 14 Apr 2001 16:04:00 -0700 (PDT) | jmccormack@sternstewart.com | vince.j.kaminski@enron.com | ERisk interview Vince:
You may inteersted in the following interview which appeared on ERisk.com last Friday. Were Rick Buy's comments about real options taken out of context?
Yann Bonduelle leads a 25-person team for PricewaterhouseCoopers in London
that applies decision analytics and real options theory to dilemmas ranging from
valuing a biotechnology product to deciding whether to kill off an Internet financial
services business. Here he talks to Rob Jameson about whether this "theoretical"
approach to risky decision-making really helps businesses in their day-to-day
balancing of risk and reward. Yann holds a Ph.D degree from the
Engineering-Economic Systems Department at Stanford University, where he
studied how to apply engineering decision and design analysis to wider economic,
social and business issues. He then worked as a consultant applying his decision
analysis methodologies to problems that included consumer decision making
about innovative products such as electrical vehicles, before joining the
PricewaterhouseCoopers team in 1998 where he is now a partner. He has
written widely on the application of real options, particularly in fields of life
sciences, technology, and e-business, and has a special interest in the
relationship between risk assessment, validation of risk data and financial
valuation.
How would you sum up your approach to business decision analytics?
Most of our projects are set up to help businesses that face massive uncertainties
of some kind. Decision analysis helps people explore problems, and redesign
their decision-making process to increase the chance of them making the right
choices. For example, imagine a biotechnology company that has to decide
whether to put itself up for sale, enter a strategic relationship, or continue to go it
alone. Each of those options will lead on to other value-enhancing or
value-destroying scenarios. We work with the client firstly to understand and
challenge the assumptions associated with their most likely business
development scenarios, and secondly to help them identify decisions that would
help protect or increase the value of their technology or company. Quantifying
technical, regulatory or commercial risks can sometimes be a challenge. In
technology-intensive fields, however, we have found that managers (often
scientists) are quite willing to describe the main sources of risk and to assess the
probability that a risky event may or may not occur.
How does this kind of risky decision-making relate to real options valuation?
You can't say what the value of an asset is until you decide what you might use it
for. This means that, to form an opinion about the value of an asset, you must
explore the most important decisions that you are likely to face and that will have
a significant impact on the value of the asset. So decision analysis helps to define
the business problem and to uncover a stream of inter-related choices that are, in
effect, "real options". For example, if a company is trying to decide whether to
invest in a risky project, does it have the option to pull the plug on the investment
at an early stage if a pilot project gives a poor showing? That "real" option reduces
the riskiness, and increases the potential value, of the original business plan. So
real options and decision analysis are really very close to one another. But you
don't have to believe in real options valuations to find decision analysis useful.
What do you mean?
Often decision analysis can help managers to identify the key risks in a strategic
decision, attach weights to these, and show clearly how they interact. For many
companies this "risk discovery" is the most valuable part of the exercise.
Real options theory has been criticised recently for being, well, not very realistic.
Is it a practical approach to valuation?
It's important not to hold out unrealistic hopes for the real options approach to
valuation. But it's an exciting methodology, and it's also sometimes the only
reasonable way of tackling a very practical problem. For example, when a firm
sells an asset, the firm might have to make an independent valuation of the asset
for legal or corporate governance reasons. But in many businesses today there
are assets that simply cannot be valued in traditional ways because they are
difficult to link to cashflows. The cashflows might not exist because the business
is so novel, or they might be hidden. In some respects, a real options analysis is
much closer to reality than a traditional valuation.
How, exactly?
The classic way of valuing a future business is to base the calculation on a single
discounted cashflow that is projected from the activity. But this doesn't really take
account of the way that scenarios can change, or the fact that managers can
react to situations as they unfold. I mentioned earlier the option to kill a project or
business at an early point. But the upside is that if a pilot project yields exciting
results, it might allow you to invest more quickly and reach a revenue-generating
position in a much shorter time than the original business plan allows. So to value
a future business we really need to look at the cashflows that might arise in a
number of scenarios. This is "realistic" in that, if the project gets the green light,
you can bet that its managers will be taking that kind of decision on the ground all
of the time.
What's the most challenging part of mapping out a decision analysis tree?
Modelling the links between the variables in the decision tree -- it's something we
have particular strengths in. But it's also tricky to know when it's worthwhile to
add on more detail, and when it's better to draw back.
In a recent ERisk interview, Rick Buy, chief risk officer of Enron, said that over
the two years that Enron had experimented with the real options concept, it had
found it of "limited, but not zero, use". Why is there a slight air of cynicism about
real options in some businesses today?
It's strange that Enron would profess this attitude. A few years ago, it was widely
reported to have used real option valuation to support a very profitable purchase
decision. They had apparently bought cheaply some older generators in the US
that generated electricity at a very high cost. They knew that they could mothball
them for most of the year, and switch them on only when the electricity prices
were sufficiently high. Nevertheless, from a customer's point of view, there might
have been too much hype about the methodology. One problem in the application
of real options technology is that there are, perhaps, too many people trying to
tweak reality to conform to their "perfect" model. It's better to aim for something
pragmatic that clearly improves decisions over time. In one pharmaceutical
company we worked with recently, we worked together to improve their valuation
analyses by moving from a single discounted cash-flow methodology to one that
took into account a rather small set of business scenarios. It would have shocked
some academics and consultants, but it was an undeniable improvement on the
original approach.
Why do you think financial institutions are only just picking up on your field, when
it's been applied in the energy industry for 15 years or more?
It might have something to do with the relative stability of the banking world until
recently, and the relatively high margins that banking lines have enjoyed. Also,
industries such as energy and pharmaceuticals tend to have more people with an
engineering and science background. The dynamic modelling of decisions is
based on methodologies originally dreamed up to help engineers design electrical
and electronic systems. This approach is quite distinct from the Black-Scholes
options analyses that the banking world is familiar with: the Black-Scholes
approach is difficult to apply in a real options context, because everything
depends on the assumptions that you put into the Black-Scholes model. The real
options approach, on the other hand, is in a sense a way of modelling those
assumptions more explicitly. But banks are now adopting some of the thinking,
particularly in terms of using decision analysis to pinpoint risks and identify
value-enhancing decisions, and in using real options methodologies to sort the
wheat from the chaff in their more speculative investments.
You mean their Internet investments?
We have recently worked with a major Dutch bank that had arrived late in the
Internet game, and then made a considerable number of investments. Now that
even B2B business models have questions marks hanging over them, and many
B2C businesses are already under water, they wanted to work out which
investments might contain real value. In this situation, it's a case of ranking
priorities and helping the bank make sense of what could turn into a
decision-making chaos, rather than sophisticated valuation. It's not just a case of
whether an internet investment should be killed off, but the problem of whether
continued funding for it should take priority over budget demands for major IT
upgrades in existing businesses, and so on. These are very practical questions
and they have to be answered somehow.
Are there other areas in financial institutions that seem accessible to this
approach?
Yes, for example, we think it can help work out the value associated with various
approaches to marketing a new bank business line. At the moment, many banks
are chasing high-net-worth individuals, but it's not always clear which kind of
individual a particular bank should decide to pursue. The bank might have a
regional or industry advantage already in one particular area, for example, music
business people. But what is the churn rate associated with this kind of
customer? What is the profitability associated with the customer segment? Will
the time and cost benefits of the advantages the bank has in the sector outweigh
any disadvantages? Weighing up this kind of complex problem, where one thing
leads to and depends on another, is what decision and real options analysis is
good at.
Is there any way of rigorously backtesting or validating real options valuations?
In all honesty, not really. The problem is that by the time the option is exercised,
many of the variables surrounding it will have changed, so it's difficult to compare
our original analysis with how things turn out. However, the value of the analysis
comes not only from the final number ("the value of this asset is X") but also from
providing a thorough process, an outsider's point of view, an understanding of the
sources of value and, in short, a bit of clearer thinking.
If real options are so important, why are they so rarely cited in communications to
shareholders and equity analysts?
The battle is still to convince companies to use real option valuations as a
significant part of their internal analysis. Even in major companies in the oil & gas,
and pharmaceutical sectors, where the ideas have taken some root internally,
there seems to be a lot of reluctance to use them in external communication. We
are working with analysts to understand better what they need to if we are to move
things on to the next step.
How does the riskiness of a business, in terms of the major strategic dilemmas it
faces, relate to its share value, and its capital structure?
That's a big question. It's related to work my colleagues do on the optimal
debt-to-equity capital structure and gearing of a corporation, which in turn arises
out of the likely revenue and cost volatilities of the business. The more volatile the
business, the less gearing it can sustain, and the higher the cost of capital. Our
work touches on this in the sense that exercising (many) specific real options can
allow a firm to change its nature, and thus also its risk profile. One classic
example is the pharmaceutical industry. A host of different kinds of companies
service that industry from "big pharma" companies through to smaller
biotechnology startups and run-of-the-mill contract research organisations. A
contract research organisation is often operating within a very competitive
environment with relatively few risks--it does not invest in drug development itself
-- but also very thin margins. But in fact, a few of these companies have used the
skills and knowledge they have developed to become much more substantial and
profitable healthcare companies of various kinds. It's an example of a company
exercising the real options that lie within its skills and assets to transform its own
identity.
Rob Jameson, ERisk |
forney-j/inbox/131. | 30654660.1075861680767.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Mon, 12 Nov 2001 08:38:01 -0800 (PST) | lloyd.will@enron.com | daniel.muschar@enron.com, don.baughman@enron.com, jae.black@enron.com | RE: 24 hr 1-800 phone Real time 24 hour 1-800-349-5527 and 1-877-367-6601
Genco 1-877-294-3900
Services 1-800-611-1282
How will the cutover work. If a trader, operator logins in at the new building will the 800 numbers not follow. If so then we will bring in an extra crew at noon to login and get set up in the new building with a planned cut over around 3pm. Once the transfer is done you will relocate the mapp equipment as well as the remaining ercot, midwest, southeast and northeast equipment to the new building.
The night shift will report to the new building at 6pm.
Thanks.
-----Original Message-----
From: Muschar, Daniel
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 9:45 AM
To: Baughman Jr., Don; Black, Tamara Jae; Will, Lloyd
Subject: 24 hr 1-800 phone
TJ:
How many 1-800 phone numbers does power have? ( If any other than 24 Hr trading, please advise)
What is the number for 24 HR group? ( I will need to coordinate a cutover for this)
Do you know of any special phone needs for the weekend trading? (The people on turrets will be fine, they pin in anywhere)
Any other thoughts or concerns are appreciated.
Thank you,
Daniel A. Muschar
ECS Project Team Lead
Office: 713-853-4344
Cell: 281-541-6203
daniel.muschar@enron.com
CCNA, MCSE, CNA, A+ |
dasovich-j/sent/12147. | 27279858.1075849617544.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Thu, 26 Jul 2001 05:42:00 -0700 (PDT) | jeff.dasovich@enron.com | shelley.corman@enron.com | RE: Transwestern Hearing i think that i can get you something. how quickly do you need it?
best,
jeff
Shelley Corman/ENRON@enronXgate
07/26/2001 12:28 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: RE: Transwestern Hearing
Do you have any materials that describe SoCal's current windowing procedure? |
hayslett-r/inbox/45. | 12786174.1075862287597.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Thu, 25 Oct 2001 08:33:47 -0700 (PDT) | mark.mcconnell@enron.com | kimberly.watson@enron.com, mansoor.abdmoulaie@enron.com, | Questar Southern Trails Data Room OCT 29 - 30 (Monday and Tuesday) We will be able to attend the Questar Southern Trails data room on Monday and Tuesday (Oct 29th and 30th) as originally planned. If you only need one day, please let me know which day you'll be attending.
Questar is located at 180 East 100 South, Salt Lake City, Utah. Our main contacts are Jodi Starley at (801) 324-2082 and Gary Schmitt at (801) 324-2082. The hours of the data room are 8:00 - 4:00.
They are looking at our data request and working to make sure they can accomodate us. Also, Engineers available for interviewing are only available on Monday. Legal staff needed to be interviewed are only available on Tuesday. If there are other staff that are needed for interviews, please let me know.
Some attendees are staying at the Salt Lake City MARRIOTT SALT LAKE CITY, 75 S. West Temple, Salt Lake City, UT 84101 Phone: 1-801-531-0800 FAX: 1-801-532-4127
for Sunday and Monday nights. You need to make your own travel reservations and it is advised that you do that as soon as possible.
The Bid for Southern Trails West Leg) is due December 10th.
I show the following people going to the data room:
1. L.D. Stephens - Team Leader/Operations
2. Larry Campbell - Environmental
3. Larry Gleffe - ROW
4. Mike Ames - Pipeline Safety
5. Warren Schick - Property Tax
6. Bob Chandler - Finance
7. Stephen Dowd - Corp Dev
8. Kim Watson - Marketing
9. Mark McConnell - Marketing
Please let me know if this list needs any corrections.
Mark
Mark McConnell
Transwestern Pipeline Company
713-345-7896 office
713-822-4862 cell
713-646-2551 fax
mark.mcconnell@enron.com |
dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4490. | 14042180.1075843706664.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Mon, 9 Apr 2001 03:25:00 -0700 (PDT) | rebecca.cantrell@enron.com | barry.tycholiz@enron.com, colleen.sullivan@enron.com, donna.greif@enron.com, | FERC gives Kern River project speedy approval From today's Gas Daily:
***FERC gives Kern River project speedy approval
Only three weeks after receiving the certificate application, FERC
Friday granted Kern River Gas Transmission authority to proceed
with a 135 million cfd expansion of its system that will move new
gas supplies from Wyoming to California. The unprecedented speed in
which FERC completed its review of the $81 million project grew out
of the commission's desire to address the energy crisis in
California, which is expected to worsen this summer in light of
forecasts for continued high gas prices and shortages of power
generation capacity.
FERC typically takes several months to complete the review
process of a pipeline project application of similar size to Kern
River's, a FERC spokeswoman said. But the commission said its staff
was able to successfully coordinate regulatory efforts with
federal and state agencies to ensure Kern River's application
process moved expeditiously.
"We are pleased the FERC has fast-tracked this application," said
Kirk Morgan, director of business development for Kern River. "We
are looking at every option to bring additional supplies of natural
gas to the California market in time for the summer cooling
season," he said.
The expansion will include three new "emergency" compressor
stations: the Elberta Compressor Station in Utah County, Utah; the
Veyo Compressor station in Washington County, Utah; and the
Daggett Compressor Station in San Bernardino County, Calif. The
installation of these new facilities -- which have been approved by
various permitting agencies in Wyoming, Utah, Nevada and California
-- will boost capacity on the system by 19%, Kern River said.
The proposal also included upgrades at three existing
compressor stations: the Muddy Creek Compressor Station in
Lincoln County, Wyo., the Fillmore Compressor Station in Millard
County, Utah; and the Goodsprings Compressor Station in Clark
County, Nev. The plan also included an upgrade of the existing
Wheeler Ridge Meter Station in Kern County, Calif. Kern River said
Friday that the expansion's expected in-service date is July 23.
"Our rapid certification of these facilities is evidence that we
are prepared to do whatever we can to rush supplies to the West
Coast markets," FERC Chairman Curt Hebert said in a statement
Friday. "My fellow commissioners, William L. Massey and Linda K.
Breathitt, pulled together, with staff's assistance, to give priority
to the West's energy needs."
Although she voted to approve the certificate, Breathitt wasn't
completely happy with the process involved in permitting. "[I]t has
been somewhat difficult for me to view Kern River's 'California
Action' project as being one that necessarily merits the kind of
extraordinary regulatory treatment that we have granted the
applicant in this case," Breathitt wrote in a partial dissent. "My
hesitation does not come only from the fact that Kern River has
pending before this commission a very similar proposal in which
the parties have raised valid concerns that would pertain to any
expansion of Kern River."
In a separate proceeding, Kern River, a subsidiary of Williams,
filed an application with FERC last year for permission to add
124,500 dth/d of firm transportation service, which is scheduled
to go into service May 1, 2002. Breathitt argued that it would have
made more sense for the commission to have considered the two
applications at the same time.
But she also stressed that, because of capacity constraints at
the Wheeler Ridge, Calif., interconnections with the intrastate
distribution systems of Southern California Gas and Pacific Gas and
Electric, the Kern River expansion may not benefit its intended
beneficiaries -- power plant operators. "[T]he record of this
proceeding is inadequate for the commission to independently
assess the congestion issues at Wheeler Ridge," she said. "I am very
uncomfortable that this order does not take the opportunity for a
fuller airing of this issue."
Breathitt argued that FERC's order will not necessarily result
in any net increase of gas in the California marketplace because of
the congestion at Wheeler Ridge.
Intervenors in the case, she noted, have alleged that insufficient
take-away capacity at Wheeler Ridge and the resulting degradation of
firm shippers' rights will place them in a situation analogous to
the type of capacity rights controversy that FERC recently
addressed at the Topock delivery point.
She praised FERC staff for meeting the compressed deadlines in
the order, but she also said, "The precedent we have created could
be a double-edged sword. What signals does this order really send?
Will the commission be able to keep up this pace on other pending
'emergency' expansion applications?" (CP01-106) MH/CD |
kaminski-v/notes_inbox/27. | 1985968.1075856612098.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Wed, 2 May 2001 04:29:00 -0700 (PDT) | zimin.lu@enron.com | tai.woo@enron.com, paulo.issler@enron.com | Re: Asian Option for Pavel Tai Woo,
Here are the c-codes for the CrudeAPO. 'Sig' is the spot
volatility meaning the price volatility within the delivery period.
You should consult with Pavel for the definition of this "extra"
parameters. We
would like to see the Position Monitor once you get it running.
We might have some additional suggestions.
Paulo,
Why don't we have a documentation on CrudeAPO you worked on ?
I can not find it in Exotica help file. Please supply that to Tai, thanks.
--------------------------------------
From: Tai Woo/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/02/2001 09:55 AM
To: Paulo Issler/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kara Maloney/ENRON@enronXgate, Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Asian Option for Pavel
This morning, Zimin told me that Pavel is using a special model in evaluating
his Asian option portfolio.
He asked me to talk to you in order to access to the code so that I can see
the difference made to the model.
As I cannot find the doc. describing this model, please tell me what that new
input parameter 'Sig' is.
Thanks, |
germany-c/sent_items/550. | 29713020.1075840521515.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Mon, 18 Mar 2002 06:42:19 -0800 (PST) | chris.germany@enron.com | rita.wynne@enron.com | RE: Sonat Park & Loan Excellent notes. Thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: Wynne, Rita
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 8:34 AM
To: Germany, Chris
Cc: Concannon, Ruth; Garza, Maria
Subject: RE: Sonat Park & Loan
Chris,
I am faxing copies of Jan. 2002 and Feb. 2002 Sonat invoices to Maria. I do see the balances on #1 and #2 on the Jan. 2002 statements. It looks like we received 77,292 mmbtus back on contract PSNG2194 leaving a balance of 188,949 on deal #1222. There was no activity for Jan. 2002 on contract PAL1001,deal 1424. We were charged a total of $19,043.73 for the remaining volumes in storage ($.00305 per day). Please let me know if there is anything else that I need to do.
Thanks,
Rita x37694
-----Original Message-----
From: Germany, Chris
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 5:05 PM
To: Germany, Chris; McMichael Jr., Ed; Concannon, Ruth; 'Mark.Ellenberg@cwt.com'
Cc: Parks, Joe; Garza, Maria; Mann, Kay; Olinger, Kimberly S.; Polsky, Phil; 'Shemin V. Proctor (E-mail)'; Dhont, Margaret; Wynne, Rita; Sanchez, Christina; Apollo, Beth
Subject: RE: Sonat Park & Loan
Still not sure about the actual volumes for items 1 and 3 below but we did confirm that Sonat did not pay us for the volumes delivered in Jan 2002.
-----Original Message-----
From: Germany, Chris
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 1:19 PM
To: McMichael Jr., Ed; Concannon, Ruth; 'Mark.Ellenberg@cwt.com'
Cc: Parks, Joe; Garza, Maria; Mann, Kay; Olinger, Kimberly S.; Polsky, Phil; 'Shemin V. Proctor (E-mail)'; Dhont, Margaret; Wynne, Rita; Sanchez, Christina; Apollo, Beth
Subject: RE: Sonat Park & Loan
Mark, I assume you are the person Sonat will be contacting. Here are some items to consider,
1. Park balance on deal #1222 188,949 dth ( + or - 10,000 dth)
2. Loan balance on deal #1424 (96,000) dth
3. ENA sold Sonat 496,000 dth at $2.885 for Jan 2002 and did not deliver 418,708 dth (+ or - 10,000 dth, related to Item #1)
4. ENA sold Sonat 310,000 dth at $2.955 for May 2002, I don't know if this deal has been terminated or not.
Rita, Maria and I are looking for the Sonat pipeline statements for Jan 2002. We have Dec 2001. Would you see if you have those and let one of us know please? Sonat may have stopped sending us statements, but this would answer my volume questions on items 1 and 3.
Margaret, could you see if Sonat paid us for 77,292 dth x $2.885 = $222,987.42 for the sale in Jan 2002? I would be very surprised if they did.
-----Original Message-----
From: Sanchez, Christina
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 10:32 AM
To: Germany, Chris; McMichael Jr., Ed; Concannon, Ruth; 'Mark.Ellenberg@cwt.com'
Cc: Parks, Joe; Garza, Maria; Mann, Kay; Olinger, Kimberly S.; Polsky, Phil; 'Shemin V. Proctor (E-mail)'; Dhont, Margaret
Subject: RE: Sonat Park & Loan
3/14/02
10:25 am
Barbara Gilbert, my scheduling rep. at Sonat, informed me that the attorneys in Sonat's Houston office will be contacting Enron's attorneys to set up a meeting to address the PAL issue. .
Christina Sanchez
-----Original Message-----
From: Germany, Chris
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 10:08 AM
To: McMichael Jr., Ed; Concannon, Ruth; 'Mark.Ellenberg@cwt.com'
Cc: Parks, Joe; Garza, Maria; Mann, Kay; Olinger, Kimberly S.; Sanchez, Christina; Polsky, Phil; 'Shemin V. Proctor (E-mail)'; Dhont, Margaret
Subject: RE: Sonat Park & Loan
3/14/02
9:50 AM Per Tammi Depaolis (832-397-1728) at Sequent. Tammi spoke to Lisa Guthrie (205-325-3816) at Sonat to find out what flexibility Sequent would have taking out the parked gas. Lisa said she didn't know if Enron could sell the gas.
-----Original Message-----
From: McMichael Jr., Ed
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 7:29 PM
To: Germany, Chris; Concannon, Ruth; 'Mark.Ellenberg@cwt.com'
Cc: Parks, Joe; Garza, Maria; Mann, Kay; Olinger, Kimberly S.; Sanchez, Christina; Polsky, Phil; 'Shemin V. Proctor (E-mail)'; Dhont, Margaret
Subject: RE: Sonat Park & Loan
Thanks for the information. Sell, Sell, Sell! Sell it all to Sequent for March if you can get a good bid and have them agree to pay the moment we/they get confirmation on the nomination. Try to get other bids to validate as best you can. Do not talk to Sonat unless you have to - - asking permission is not advisable.
-----Original Message-----
From: Germany, Chris
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 4:38 PM
To: McMichael Jr., Ed; Concannon, Ruth; 'Mark.Ellenberg@cwt.com'
Cc: Parks, Joe; Garza, Maria; Mann, Kay; Olinger, Kimberly S.; Sanchez, Christina; Polsky, Phil; Shemin V. Proctor (E-mail); Dhont, Margaret
Subject: Sonat Park & Loan
Ruth Concannon told me we want to try and sell the parked gas on Sonat. This is what we have found out over the last 2 days.
ENA no longer has the ability to do nominations on Sonat's scheduling Christina Sanchez (ENA Scheduler) believes that under normal conditions, we can sell the parked gas on Sonat without doing any nominations. The party we sell the gas to would nominate the gas away from a specific PAL meter and reference our PAL contract as the upstream contract. Today I spoke with Tammi Depaolis at Sequent - she is interested in buying the gas and she might prepay for it. I need to know;
1. What volume to sell, I assume we are talking about 188,949 dth on deal #1222, which means we ignore the loaned volume of 96,000 dth on deal #1424.
2. What period do I sell the gas for? All out by March 31st subject to the operational conditions on the pipeline? Or base load in April? I prefer all out by March 31st but I would like to ask the pipeline if that's ok?
3. How many bids do I need to get? I called Sequent because I know they are active on Sonat.
4. This may not matter but did Sonat ever pay us for the gas ENA sold them in January 2002 (see items in red down below).
Tammi will probably check with the pipeline to see if its ok to take our gas. I don't want to sell gas to someone then find out the pipeline will not let them take it.
All of my previous notes are shown below in blue.
Summary: Sonat has netted our Parked Gas Balance with our Loaned Gas Balance and filed a motion with the courts to retain the remaining Parked Gas Balance, 92,949 dth per my conversation with Sonat, to offset $879,030.42 ENA owes Sonat for the purchase of gas in October 2001. According to Sonat, the payment was due November 26, 2001 but ENA did not pay. Sonat's motion is set to be reviewed by the court on March 6th.
2/19/02 History - Per Dave Dyer (205-326-2007) at Sonat
ENA has 2 Park & Loan (PAL) contracts with Sonat. All PAL's with Sonat are under master contract PAL1001. Sonat assigns a deal number to each deal under this contract.
Deal #1424 - ENA borrowed a total of 96,000 dth from Nov 3rd-5th and has not paid this back. ENA still owes Sonat 96,000 dth. The terms of the deal were to payback Sonat anytime with 3 days notice on any 3 days on 2002, SONAT ONLY CHARGED ENA $96.00 FOR THIS DEAL, because Sonat needed to get gas off the system.
Deal #1222 - ENA parked 309,192 dth in August to come out in Jan 2002. Sonat let ENA withdraw 42,951 on 11/29/01 leaving a balance of 266,241 dth. In Jan 2002, ENA withdrew 8,588 dth per day for the 1st-9th. That left a balance of 188,949 dth. On Jan 8th, 2002, Sonat sent a letter stating that Sonat will hold on to the remaining to balance to offset 1) the Loaned gas on deal #1424 (96,000 dth) and 2) to offset dollars ENA has not paid Sonat for gas Sonat sold to ENA in October 2001. According to Sonat, the remaining balance on this deal is 92,949 dth = [309,192 parked in Aug - 42,951 w/d in Nov - 77,292 w/d in Jan - 92,000 balance on #1424]. According to Sonat's letter, Sonat has filed the appropriate motion for court approval for the offsets. According to Dave, ENA is being billed $.00305 x daily balance in this account. ENA should have paid some bigger amount when the gas was parked in August.
Other items;
ENA purchased system supply from Sonat in October 2001. ENA purchased 286,998 at an average price of $3.063 = $879,030.42. According to Sonat, ENA did not pay for this before Enron declared bankruptcy. ENA also sold Sonat gas - 16,000 dth day at $2.885 (sitara #1172076) in January 2002 and 10,000 dth day at $2.955 in May 2002 (sitara #1172087). ENA used 77,292 dth of the parked gas on deal #1222 to supply the 16,000 dth before Sonat stopped ENA from withdrawing from the park. ENA defaulted on 418,708 dth of the Sonat deal in January.
Sonat's in house legal counsel is Patti Frances (205-325-7696). I left a message for Patti to call me.
2/20/02
Patti Frances returned my call. Patti said the motion is currently set to be reviewed by the court on March 6th. I asked Patti if there were any penalties for not performing on the Jan 2002 sale to Sonat and if Sonat was going to pay for the 77,292 dth (8,588 dth per day for Jan 1st - 9th) that ENA did supply. Patti said she didn't think there were penalties but she would verify that and see if they were going to pay. I also asked her if Sonat is still honoring the ENA sale to Sonat in May 2002 and if Sonat would pay ENA if ENA performed. She will check on it and call me back.
2/25/02
Per Kay Mann - Mark Ellenberg is the legal counsel assigned to this contract.
1:10 PM. Left a follow-up message for Patti Frances regarding our conversation on 2/20/02.
3/11/02
Per Ruth - Mark Ellenberg wants us to try and pull the gas out of the Sonat Pal. Christina Sanchez (ENA Scheduler) will find out 1) if we still have access to Sonat's EBB and 2) if we can nominate the gas out of the PAL's.
3/13/02
Per Christina - ENA's ID's and passwords have been cancelled. Christina called Barbara Gilbert (205-325-7310), ENA's account rep at Sonat - Barbara said she would talk about this issue with Sonat's legal counsel and see if its ok to set up ENA with an ID. Christina also believes we could sell the gas without doing any nominations. The party we sell the gas to would use a specific PAL's meter and reference our PAL contract as the upstream.
3:30 PM Tammi Depaolis (832-397-1728) at Sequent is interested in buying this gas and she might prepay to get it. She will see if they can take the gas without ENA doing a nomination. I need to verify the volume parked and when I want Sonat to take it out.
3:40 PM Barbara is waiting to hear from Sonat's legal department. |
dasovich-j/all_documents/3252. | 31995086.1075843024852.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Wed, 8 Nov 2000 09:05:00 -0800 (PST) | jkelly@fairisaac.com | jeff.dasovich@enron.com | RE: FW: MPAR Team Assignment Change 1219 Taylor St #24. Clay and taylor (north west quadrant)
call me if you have any questions
491-5572.
Should I order food for all of us, or just Ted and me?
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 4:52 PM
To: Jacqueline Kelly
Cc: Kimberely Kupiecki (E-mail); Ted Chin (E-mail)
Subject: RE: FW: MPAR Team Assignment Change
i have no parking. let's meet at your place. kim and i can carpool and
take the "legal" spot. what's the address?
Jacqueline
Kelly To: "'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com'"
<JKelly@FairI <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>, "Ted
Chin (E-mail)"
saac.com> <tedchin@hotmail.com>, "Kimberely
Kupiecki
(E-mail)"
<kupiecki@haas.berkeley.edu>
11/08/2000 cc:
06:33 PM Subject: RE: FW: MPAR Team
Assignment Change
We can also meet at my meager apartment. Parking is difficult, although,
there is one spot on the sidewalk in front of my house that the
neighborhood
has deemed a legal spot. Do you have parking Jeff?
Either is fine with me!
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 4:26 PM
To: Jacqueline Kelly
Subject: Re: FW: MPAR Team Assignment Change
We can meet at my meager apartment if you like. Around 7?
Jacqueline
Kelly To: "Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)"
<JKelly@FairI <dasovich@haas.berkeley.edu>
saac.com> cc:
Subject: FW: MPAR Team
Assignment Change
11/08/2000
01:54 PM
How lame is this e-mail...
(Did you complain about being on my team??)
Where are we meeting tonight? I think I may have your case study...I have
someone's.
See you tonight,
Jackie
-----Original Message-----
From: Meg St. John [mailto:mstjohn@haas.berkeley.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 11:32 AM
To: kelly@haas.berkeley.edu
Subject: MPAR Team Assignment Change
Jackie,
We have changed your team assignment for the Mid Program Academic
Retreat. You were assigned to Atlantic 5, but that team had more members
than any other and we needed to reshuffle to achieve some parity.
You are now assigned to Atlantic 4.
This means that your Pre-Meeting will occur on Tuesday, and not Wednesday.
Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions or concerns that
you may have.
Thank you,
Meg St. John
Assistant Director, Evening MBA Program
(510) 527-1406 |
dasovich-j/notes_inbox/68. | 16361326.1075843095950.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Thu, 24 Aug 2000 17:21:00 -0700 (PDT) | douglass@arterhadden.com | barbara_klemstine@apses.com, robert_anderson@apses.com, berry@apx.com, | Re: Urgent WPTF Board Meeting to Discuss FERC Order on SDG&E As Gary Ackerman requested this afternoon, attached is a summary of the FERC
Order issued yesterday which rejected the SDG&E price cap complaint and
commenced a proceeding which will involve hearings regarding the operation
of the California market, problems with ISO and PX tariffs and resolve any
defects in the operation of competitive power markets in California.
?
Please call or write if you have any questions about the attached memo or
the Order itself.
?
Dan
>>> "Gary Ackerman" <foothi19@idt.net> 08/24/00 02:37PM >>>
Folks,
Today the FERC issued an Order on SDG&E's complaint to cap generator
bids at $250, and they did so not only with a flat denial, but also by
opening a Section 206 Proceeding to investigate California's wholesale
power markets. That means there will be full evidentiary hearing at
FERC regarding California's wholesale market. WPTF is an intervenor in
the case, and I think we should discuss WPTF's strategy and position on
this case before the next Board meeting (September 12).
Toward that end, I have asked Rob Lamkin, our Chairman, to establish
date for a Board teleconference call to discuss our position, craft
motion, and vote. I have also asked Dan Douglass to review the attached
Order of FERC (both docs are the same, but slightly different computer
format), prepare a summary, and to prepare an estimate for WPTF's
participation. I would be more than happy to be a witness in the case.
I am also sending this notice to our general member representative who
may wish to be participants in our pleading. Whereas the general
members can not vote on WPTF's major positions, they can participate in
the case development, funding, and preparation.
I will inform you of the date and time for our teleconference Board
meeting in a later e-mail.
gba
- Summary of Order of 8-23-00.doc |
kean-s/archiving/untitled/8859. | 17916622.1075850036671.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Fri, 6 Jul 2001 00:10:00 -0700 (PDT) | steven.kean@enron.com | rosalee.fleming@enron.com | Draft letter to Paul Joskow for Ken Lay I think this letter looks fine. For the hororarium, I suggest we use
whatever we paid Kudlow for his participation (I believe Ken also entered
into a consulting contract with Kudlow, but I'm referring only to the
one-time payment for the advisory council meeting he attended).
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 07/06/2001
07:03 AM ---------------------------
Stelzer@aol.com on 07/05/2001 08:58:38 PM
To: klay@enron.com, rosalee.fleming@enron.com, skean@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Draft letter to Paul Joskow for Ken Lay
I INFORMALLY SOUNDED PAUL OUT, AND HE EXPRESSED AN INTEREST IF THE DATES WORK.
Possible letter to Paul Joskow from Ken Lay
Dear Paul:
As you may have heard, Enron has an advisory committee consisting of
leaders in the academic and business communities (list attached). This
committee meets twice each year, along with invited speakers on subjects of
interest to Enron. Top executives of our company do their best to attend.
Starting on the afternoon of October 30, and concluding late in the day
on October 31, we will be meeting in London. I was most impressed with your
presentation at the Aspen Institute energy forum, and am hoping that you
might consider joining our meeting to discuss "Where do we go from here: how
to preserve the momentum of deregulation after California."
We would be delighted to cover business class travel costs and all other
expenses incident to your trip to London, including hotel costs should you
choose to extend your stay for several days. In addition, there would be an
honorarium of $XXXXXX.
Do try to join us: you will find the other speakers interesting, and
London a delightful place in which to spend a bit of time. And we would
benefit enormously from your participation.
Sincerely, |
kean-s/discussion_threads/3373. | 17304702.1075848188845.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Wed, 23 May 2001 10:44:00 -0700 (PDT) | yolanda@ccemtl.org | skean@enron.com | NACEC electricity documents Dear Steve Kean,
As per your request, please find attached the following background documents
related to NACECs Initiative: "Environmental Challenges and Opportunities of
the Evolving Continental Electricity Market"
1) background report prepared for the first Advisory Board meeting
2) proceedings from the first Advisory Board meeting
sincerely,
Yolanda Clegg
- elecbkg-e.doc
- proceedings2e.doc |
dasovich-j/sent/3966. | 10456649.1075843874846.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Wed, 4 Apr 2001 09:33:00 -0700 (PDT) | jeff.dasovich@enron.com | paul.kaufman@enron.com | Re: California Work Plan sounds good. |
farmer-d/discussion_threads/1374. | 24693894.1075854075967.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Mon, 12 Jun 2000 03:01:00 -0700 (PDT) | ami.chokshi@enron.com | george.smith@enron.com, edward.terry@enron.com, katherine.kelly@enron.com, | EC 254, SP 13 and WC 45(20) Revisions ---------------------- Forwarded by Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron on 06/12/2000
10:00 AM ---------------------------
"Steve Holmes" <Steve.Holmes@dvn.com> on 06/12/2000 09:52:18 AM
To: <Ami.Chokshi@enron.com>, <Clarissa.Garcia@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: EC 254, SP 13 and WC 45(20) Revisions
Clarissa,
Per our conversation last week, we are unable to increase EC 254, SP 13 and
WC 45(20) due to the Tennessee seal on the 800 leg. This shall confirm the
volumes will remain at first of the month levels until the seal is lifted.
At that time, I will recalculate the changes and notify you of any changes at
that time.
Thanks,
Steve |
dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5397. | 10849987.1075843738836.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Thu, 8 Feb 2001 02:01:00 -0800 (PST) | charryl@pacbell.net | clintonsmor@aol.com, jeff_dasovich@enron.com, joellising@ca.slr.com | [Fwd: Information Update on Perix] -------- Original Message --------
Subject: Information Update on Perix
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2001 20:02:33 -0500 (EST)
From: MarkRsea@aol.com
To: ROB-GRETCHEN-DAVIS@email.msn.com,
moryak@worldnet.att.net,anchoraweigh@caltel.com,
zaverukha@worldnet.att.net, akoola@juno.com,KKKobe@kh.rim.or.jp,
MNJC@home.com, SUMMITEERS@worldnet.net, Igo2c@aol.com,JOJOLA7@aol.com,
charryl@pacbell.net, sakae_yamamoto@ccgate.apl.com,skuwada_ilms@msn.com,
SAUTNERS@pacbell.net, CAPTPWF@aol.com,jimbo@pacifier.com,
CatRsea@aol.com, merahma@boracap.i-next.net,SeaBaggg@aol.com,
ICEAXXE@aol.com, cregan@juno.com, jules@shasta.com,LADAIR@directcon.net,
ADAIR6@prodigy.net, jer@oregon.uoregon.edu
Good day all:
I want to update you on some events regarding Perix. I have tried to
contact them today via telephone, web site and email and I'm not having
any
luck. I presently don't know if they are in business or been bought out
by
another firm or what.
The Web Site I tried: perixindustries.com connects me to another firm
SRS
Consulting.
Email address: perixgroup@aol.com gives the following error "This is
not a
known member"
Telephone number 714-923-2612 and fax number 714-923-2601 are
continuously
busy.
If you have the correct contact numbers, please let me know.
Some history:
Oct 4, 2000, Chairman of the Board for Perix Industries, Mr. James E.
Reinmuth stated in an email, "I will personally commit to the
preparation of
a Perix newsletter within the next 60 days which summarizes the results
of
negotiations with several potential joint venture partners, and our
plans for
Year 2001."
I have received no information. Mr. Reinmuth's letter was in direct
response to the concern raised by several shareholders on the lack of
information on our investment. If anyone has received the newsletter,
please
email me and I'll forward a check to you to mail me a copy.
Nov 8, 2000: Letter sent to Perix Industries by attorney Zachary A.
Wright
of Short, Cressman & Burgess, PLLC on behalf of myself requesting
financial
information of Perix.
As per Mr. Wright, I quote the following, which was sent to Perix in
the
letter:
QUOTE
California corporations are required by law to make certain
information
available to shareholders. First, an annual report must be provided to
shareholders within 120 days of the end of the corporation's fiscal
year,
unless this requiremetn is waived by the corporation's bylaws.
Cal.CorpCode
1501(a). Even if the requirement is waived, the corporation must
provide a
year-end financial report to a shareholder within (30) days of the
shareholder's request for it. Cal.CorpCode 1501(c). This year-end
financial
report must contain a balance sheet and an income statement, as well as
a
statement of changes in financial position for the fiscal year. It must
be
accompanied by a report of the corporation's independent accountants or,
of
there is no such report, a certificate signed by an authorized officer
of the
corporation that the statements were prepared accurately and completely
from
the books and records of the corporation. Second, California law
requires
that corporations make available to shareholders "accounting books and
records" of the corporation, as well as the minutes of any proceedings
of
shareholders, the board of directors or committees of the board of the
corporation. Cal.CorpCode 1601. This definition encompasses all books
of
account, accounting journals, share registers or duplicate share
registers.
We hereby demand that you copy and mail to us the information that
must be
made available to Mr. Remijan under California law no later than thirty
(30)
days from the date of this letter.
UNQUOTE
My attorney or I have not received any word or information from
Perix
regarding this request for financial information. Mr Wright advises
that I
could file a lawsuit for a writ of mandamus or other order to obtain
this
information from Perix. California law Cal.Corp.Code 1603 and other
applicable law also provides for payment of all costs and attorneys'
fees by
the corporation in the event that the shareholder is required to file
suit to
obtain the information.
If anyone has further information about whether Perix is still in
business, I would appreciate an email. Something tells me that it
doesn't
look good for us. I hope that I am wrong.
Thanks and best regards,
Mark Remijan
MarkRsea@aol.com
206-782-3278 |
campbell-l/discussion_threads/1015. | 23710715.1075857870152.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Tue, 5 Dec 2000 06:09:00 -0800 (PST) | mailbot@datek.com | lcampbel@enron.com | "Datek Online execution report" Dear Mr. LARRY CAMPBELL:
Thank you for your order.
You bought 100 shares of JNPR (Juniper Networks Inc Com) at 136 7/16.
ORDER DETAILS:
The tracking number for this order is: B-300-AAZO-4506
Order entered at: 09:08:51 on 12/05/00
Order processing began at: 09:08:51
Order executed at: 09:08:52 on 12/05/00
ACCOUNT DETAILS:
Time and Date: 09:08:52 on 12/05/00
Your position in JNPR is 230 shares
Your real cash total is $-11,846.67
You will receive a printed Datek Online confirmation by postal mail, or by
electronic delivery if you are subscribed to that service.
Questions regarding this transaction? Contact our Customer Support department
by e-mailing support@datek.com. Please reference the order tracking number. |
dasovich-j/inbox/1045. | 5619190.1075859213154.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Sun, 16 Dec 2001 10:33:00 -0800 (PST) | eldon@direcpc.com | e-mail <'.'andre@enron.com>, e-mail <'.'andy@enron.com>, | Week 15--Prelim (Revised) We had entered Mickey's picks incorrectly. If you see any other errors
please let us know. Here's the corrected sheet: |
germany-c/_sent_mail/1803. | 9848038.1075853853060.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Tue, 28 Dec 1999 11:49:00 -0800 (PST) | chris.germany@enron.com | clarissa.garcia@enron.com, cindy.vachuska@enron.com, | January 1, 2, 3, Tn ZN6 citygates ---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 12/28/99 07:47
PM ---------------------------
pdrexel@columbiaenergygroup.com on 12/28/99 02:21:36 PM
To: Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: January 1, 2, 3, Tn ZN6 citygates
---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas on 12/28/99
02:28 PM ---------------------------
Marianne Stiles
12/28/99 02:17 PM
To: Karen Bobb/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc: Noel Bartlo/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Scott
Goodell/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Paul
Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
Subject: January 1, 2, 3, Tn ZN6 citygates
Karen - All but S. Ct. and Boston Gas are good to nom. Please let me know
k#'s. Scott called me earlier and told me we are expecting a capacity piece
of 1000 dth and we bought the remaining delivered. Whom did we purchase the
delivered from? (I would like to call the supplier and give them the
breakdown so that I can get a contract number).
Noel - Also as per our earlier conversation, Yankee is giving me until 4:30
p.m. to turn in a contract # for their noms. They are quoting their tariff
as
we have never turned our contract number in to them on time. I need a
contract number for Tennesse and AGT for Yankee. It is urgent. |
germany-c/_sent_mail/444. | 11400512.1075853822408.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Sun, 19 Nov 2000 04:39:00 -0800 (PST) | chris.germany@enron.com | dan.junek@enron.com, judy.townsend@enron.com, scott.goodell@enron.com, | A&M Demands Recount -
> Subject: OU/A&M Game
> Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 09:34:46 -0800
>
> College Station, TX (AP) - R.C. Slocum and the Texas A&M Aggies are
> demanding a recount of the game in which Oklahoma
> won 35 to 31. "The end zones were confusing," says Slocum. "I'm sure that
> some of the touchdowns that went in Oklahoma's end zone were meant to go
> into ours. We were scoring in those end zones also. Oklahoma would never
> have scored thirty-five points. There's no way we lost this one. A&M
> demands
> a recount."
>
> Oklahoma officials are calling this "outrageous". "They agreed to the
> size,
> shape and locations of the end zones prior to kick-off," replies OU coach
> Bob Stoops. "If they had a problem with them, they should have said so
> before we started. You don't get to keep playing until you're happy with
> the
> outcome. Someone had to lose. We've scored over thirty-five points many
> times."
>
> A&M has sent lawyers, farmers, and those guys in the funny boots as well
> as
> Reville down to Kyle Field, where the scoreboard will be tested.
> "We
> are confident that when the points are re-totaled, we will be the winner
> of
> the game," says Slocum.
>
> OU also points out that in many games prior to this one, the same end
> zones
> were used. "They didn't have a problem with the end
> zones until they lost," says Stoops.
>
> Outside of Kyle Field, A&M student protesters have gathered bearing signs
> such as, "A&M wants a fair game!
> WHOOOOOOP!" Students' thoughts echoed their signs. "All we want is a
fair
> total of the points before we declare a winner," says student Karen Hays,
> an
> Aggie from Marfa. "We need to proceed cautiously and not rush to judgment
> before we declare a winner."
>
> ABC, around 2:00pm central time, had mistakenly declared A&M the winner,
> despite the slim 3 point lead the Aggies held at
> that point. At about 2:30 pm, with the game still to close to call, ABC
> had
> to back off its prediction.
>
> College Football analyst Brent Musburger made the call. "We felt that
with
> a
> number of points still not added in by Jamaar Tombs
> and the Aggies, we were certain A&M would carry this game. We may have
> been
> premature in our prediction." |
jones-t/notes_inbox/5082. | 14965014.1075847459875.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Mon, 4 Jun 2001 08:05:00 -0700 (PDT) | lisa.lees@enron.com | tana.jones@enron.com, kelly.lombardi@enron.com, karen.lambert@enron.com | RE: Product type approval needed (US Gas Phy Fwd Secondary Firm) The product long descriptions below will fall under the new product type US
Gas Phy Fwd Secondary Firm.
Credit (Tom Moran) has approved copying the profiles for the new product type
from the following:
US Gas Phy Fwd Firm
Please respond to Stephanie Sever no later than 10 a.m. on Wednesday, June 6.
Thank you.
-----Original Message-----
From: Walker, Chris
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 3:42 PM
To: Blumenthal, Jeff; Musch, Susan; Hayden, Frank; Taylor, Mark; Dickson,
Stacy; Moran, Tom; Love, Phillip M.; Hunter, Larry Joe
Cc: Lees, Lisa; Sweitzer, Tara; Jones, Tana; Lambert, Karen; Lombardi, Kelly;
Sever, Stephanie; Kenne, Dawn C.; Moorer, Torrey; Cass, Robert B.; Meredith,
Kevin; Lozano, Melba; Alatorre, Carlos
Subject: Product type approval needed (US Gas Phy Fwd Secondary Firm)
Please approve the following product type in Data Manager after 11 A.M.
US Gas Phy Fwd Secondary Firm
<< File: Secondary Firm ANR ML7rev.doc >>
<< File: ENA Natgas Firm GTC.htm >>
STEPS FOR APPROVAL:
click the START button
select PROGRAMS
select TEST APPLICATIONS
select ENRONONLINE CLUSTER(PROD)
PROCEED WITH USUAL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click the Enron Online Production Cluster "START" button
select EnronOnLine (this is the EOL Datamanager)
PROCEED WITH EOL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click on the "+" for EnronOnLine
click on the "+" for Product Types
click on the "+" for "Awaiting Approval" (OR "Partially Approved")
select the product requiring review as stated in e-mail above
Right "mouse" click on "properties" to view product set-up
TO APPROVE: Right mouse click on "Approved" |
guzman-m/notes_inbox/574. | 8675172.1075840704288.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Tue, 10 Apr 2001 18:41:00 -0700 (PDT) | pete.davis@enron.com | pete.davis@enron.com | Start Date: 4/11/01; HourAhead hour: 2; <CODESITE> Start Date: 4/11/01; HourAhead hour: 2; No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.
LOG MESSAGES:
PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041102.txt
---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
Details: (Hour: 2 / Preferred: 33.87 / Final: 20.00)
TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
SC_ID: TOSCO
MKT_TYPE: 2
TRANS_DATE: 4/11/01
UNIT_ID: UNCHEM_1_UNIT
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
Details: (Hour: 2 / Preferred: 41.40 / Final: 41.37)
TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
SC_ID: DELANO
MKT_TYPE: 2
TRANS_DATE: 4/11/01
UNIT_ID: PANDOL_6_UNIT
---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
Details: (Hour: 2 / Preferred: 47.00 / Final: 46.99)
TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
SC_ID: ECTstSW
MKT_TYPE: 2
TRANS_DATE: 4/11/01
TIE_POINT: MEAD_2_WALC
INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_8000
ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
Details: (Hour: 2 / Preferred: 8.00 / Final: 7.99)
TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
SC_ID: ECTRT
MKT_TYPE: 2
TRANS_DATE: 4/11/01
TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_BUNNY
ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL
---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
Details: (Hour: 2 / Preferred: 0.43 / Final: 0.29)
TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
LOAD_ID: PGE1
MKT_TYPE: 2
TRANS_DATE: 4/11/01
SC_ID: EPMI
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
Details: (Hour: 2 / Preferred: 4.69 / Final: 3.32)
TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
LOAD_ID: PGE2
MKT_TYPE: 2
TRANS_DATE: 4/11/01
SC_ID: EPMI
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
Details: (Hour: 2 / Preferred: 42.88 / Final: 30.55)
TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
LOAD_ID: PGE3
MKT_TYPE: 2
TRANS_DATE: 4/11/01
SC_ID: EPMI |
causholli-m/sent_items/240. | 29541930.1075862109981.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Mon, 26 Nov 2001 12:24:50 -0800 (PST) | monika.causholli@enron.com | fokrasin@trigen.com | Financial Analyst Position Monika Causholli
2240 North Boulevard #5205
Houston, Texas 77098
(713) 807-1039
mcausholli@hotmail.com
EDUCATION
BS in Financial Services/Business Administration, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon
Overall GPA 3.91/4.00. Minor: Political Science/International Affairs.
WORK EXPERIENCE
Financial Analyst/Researcher Enron North America/Industrial Markets
Salary US$44,000 Houston, TX 6/01- Present
? Analyzed the financial condition of pulp and paper companies by carefully reading through their financial statements and drawing the conclusion of their financial health. Based on the results of the analysis, prepared company reports for the origination team.
? Supported the team of originators and traders by gathering data on the pulp market, preparing presentations, doing analysis on the prices and other market variables. Wrote a weekly newsletter with the most important information that included a market commentary. Built and completed the spreadsheets that contain all the market data for pulp. The spreadsheets helped the spot/financial traders to evaluate market conditions and make trading decisions.
Real Time Trader/Analyst Enron North America
Salary: US$40,000 Portland, Oregon 6/00-6/01
? Researched the variables that affect the hourly electricity market including temperatures, planned and forced outages of generating units, loads and CISO expost prices resulting in an informed opinion about that day's trading options.
? Looked for opportunities to create value based on the research. Raised up to $100,000 a day by following the market closely, taking advantage of the arbitrage opportunities between the different markets, and making use of transmission available to send power to various points.
? Ran the El Paso Electric Utility during the off peak hours and weekends by matching the load (demand) with the supply and making the necessary decisions to run the system reliably by following the WSCC requirements on spin and nonspin requirements.
Summer Intern Enron Capital & Trade
Analyst Program Portland, Oregon 6/99-9/99
Salary: US$36,000 (annualized)
? Researched and graphed the historical temperatures for the Pacific Northwest, the Desert Southwest, and Rocky mountain and tried to find the correlation between the temperatures and energy load (demand).
? Co-designed the load-forecasting model for the Pacific Northwest, Desert Southwest and Rocky Mountains in a course of three months.
? Compiled the daily information for the term and cash traders including the historical temperatures graphs for California, daily forecasted load, and gas prices.
Financial Analyst Edicom sh.p.k.
Assistant Tirana, Albania 6/98-9/98
? Calculated revenues, expenses, interest payments and cash flows for over ten investment projects including apartment buildings and a business center.
? Translated business letters including memos and proposals from Italian/Albanian to English.
COMPUTER SKILLS
Software: Proficient in MS Word, PowerPoint, and Excel
FOREIGN LANGUAGES
Albanian Native Fluency
Italian Near-Native Fluency
MAIN STRENGTHS: Good analytical skills, detail oriented, a hard-worker, ambitious, a fast-learner, good writing skills, enthusiastic. |
derrick-j/sent_items/435. | 20083594.1075859181514.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Wed, 28 Nov 2001 18:33:05 -0800 (PST) | james.derrick@enron.com | lisa.mellencamp@enron.com | FW: Directorship Of ECAP Lisa, I would appreciate your asking the appropriate attorney to focus on this. Thank you. Jim
-----Original Message-----
From: Mason, Heidi
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 12:52 PM
To: Mcclellan, George
Cc: Minns, David; Staley, Stuart; Derrick Jr., James; McGrory, Robert
Subject: Directorship Of ECAP
George
Further to our conversation of 5am today Sydney time, I am today formally resigning as a Director of Enron Coal Asia Pacific Pty Ltd (ECAP). As I have been discussing with Stu for the past few weeks, in the current environment it has been increasingly difficult for me to carry out my duties as a Director without an ongoing commercial knowledge of the operation. Further to this, with the accounting now being done from London, I have no day to day contact with ECAP's financial position and this further complicates my position.
In light of this concern I advised Stu a few weeks ago that it would be preferable to have one of the resident commercial staff take over this role and I believe this would now be the appropriate action for ECAP to take. My resignation will leave ECAP with no resident Director as is required under Aust Corporations law. (As promised I will have our trading lawyer, Robert McGrory, send you an email today outlining the implications of this breech). While this will cause a deterioration in the position of ECAP, I feel I have no option but to take this action given the current position of Enron and our alternate views on the implications of these for ECAP. I have previously indicated to Stu that this is a matter that would need to be addressed and the lack of resolution is not sufficient reason for me to retain the role.
The action of Dynergy in terminating the proposed merger today would indicate that a review of the ability of ECAP to meet all current debts should be undertaken and had I remained as a Director I would have been recommending that a Board meeting be called to address this matter and potentially appoint an administrator if required. This action has been conducted for every other company in Sydney, hence similar consideration by ECAP Directors must be an immediate priority. Unless the Directors can satisfied yourselves that all debts will be met as and when they fall due an Administrator must be appointed to avoid personal liability and potential criminal liability. An new debts subsequently incurred included ongoing rent, travel and operating costs will be come personal liabilities of the Directors.
Regards
Heidi |
kean-s/archiving/untitled/2208. | 2373180.1075846267589.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Mon, 17 Nov 1997 05:30:00 -0800 (PST) | steven.kean@enron.com | Oklahoma legislators will be in Houston this afternoon. You speak at 3:00 |
|
bass-e/notes_inbox/505. | 2266065.1075854679206.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Sun, 12 Nov 2000 19:08:00 -0800 (PST) | noreply@ccomad3.uu.commissioner.com | undisclosed-recipients:, | Commissioner.COM E-Reports for Y2KG 11/13/00 [IMAGE]
Shop MVP.SportsLine.com |
arnold-j/sent/263. | 18869815.1075857591368.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Thu, 17 Aug 2000 08:46:00 -0700 (PDT) | john.arnold@enron.com | john.lavorato@enron.com | If J. Franco wins, you win $2425
If he loses, you lose $75 |
arnold-j/_sent_mail/506. | 27427045.1075857651911.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Wed, 11 Apr 2001 15:40:00 -0700 (PDT) | john.arnold@enron.com | jennifer.fraser@enron.com | Re: ng views the only change that's happened to my long term outlook has been that the
weather in the short term has been more bullish and we'll have 30 or so bcf
less storage than i was anticpating in two weeks. so yea, my curve is a
touch higher, but it doesnt change my longer term view. most of the move
this week was a short sqeeze of spec shorts combined with a strong heat
market. a little concerned about heat, but also saw products very strong
going into the season this past winter only to stage a huge failure. not
convinced this rally in products is different.
From: Jennifer Fraser/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/11/2001 09:04 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: ng views
where's your curve now?
MAy
June
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec Jan 02
Jen Fraser
Enron Global Markets Fundamentals
713-853-4759 |
derrick-j/deleted_items/165. | 23727554.1075852457127.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Mon, 22 Oct 2001 10:33:53 -0700 (PDT) | robert.vote@enron.com | james.derrick@enron.com | RE: CEO apex depositions Jim,
In Chuck's absence I am attempting to find out more about the issues and deadlines in the referenced case to asses the usefulness of our company's participation.
Bob Vote
-----Original Message-----
From: Derrick Jr., James
Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2001 2:38 PM
To: Vote, Robert
Subject: FW: CEO apex depositions
Bob, I forwarded this to Chuck Cheek, Bob Williams, and Richard Sanders with the question of whether we should participate and if so who would write the brief. Chuck is out until Tuesday, so I a also forwarding the message to you. Jim
-----Original Message-----
From: Fsmith008@aol.com@ENRON
Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 8:22 PM
To: peter.arbour@halliburton.com; tbattle@mitchellenergy.com; cbub@chevron.com; Derrick Jr., James; ted.m.frois@exxon.com; kerry.galvin@lyondell.com; david.garten@nli-usa.com; rick.a.harrington@usa.conoco.com; hughricekelly@reliantenergy.com; bob.kilpatrick@atofina.com; calamboley@shellus.com; lemmerw@coopercameron.com; lynchjl@bp.com; mcquemg@texaco.com; Rplaeger@br-inc.com; kera@dynegy.com; bobby.reeves@oceanenergy.com; wfschwind@marathonoil.com; dtomlin@bem.tmc.edu; Jvogel@coair.com; bobtwhilden@bmc.com; brittonw@epenergy.com; Fsmith008@aol.com
Subject: Fwd: CEO apex depositions
I am forwarding an E-mail from former Supreme Court Justice Raul Gonzalez
which may be of interest to you. If so, his phone no. and those of his
colleagues are contained in the E-mail.
Freeman E. Smith
Return-Path: <RGonzalez@lockeliddell.com>
Received: from rly-yb03.mx.aol.com (rly-yb03.mail.aol.com [172.18.146.3]) by air-yb01.mail.aol.com (v81.9) with ESMTP id MAILINYB17-1019190815; Fri, 19 Oct 2001 19:08:15 -0400
Received: from daex03.lockeliddell.com (mail.lockeliddell.com [204.0.73.15]) by rly-yb03.mail.aol.com (v81.9) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINYB32-1019190806; Fri, 19 Oct 2001 19:08:06 2000
Received: by mail.lockeliddell.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <4SX5XV4P>; Fri, 19 Oct 2001 18:07:03 -0500
Message-ID: <4166C31A2813D411A54C00508B8BEA9ED25E77@auex02.lockeliddell.com>
From: "Gonzalez, Raul A." <RGonzalez@lockeliddell.com>
To: "'Fsmith008@aol.com'" <Fsmith008@aol.com>
Cc: "Castaneda, Kirsten M." <kcastaneda@lockeliddell.com>, "Powell, Gary R." <gpowell@lockeliddell.com>
Subject: CEO apex depositions
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 18:10:53 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C158F3.4CBE1F30"
Freeman, we represent Jani-King. Their CEO was ordered to give a deposition in a case where he does not have unique or superior knowledge of discoverable information. Our attempts to get it quash or obtain relief from the court of appeals and the Supreme Court have been unsuccessful.
This issue is of importance to the jurisprudence of the state because more and more CEO's are being requested to give depositions and there is confusion in the law as to what an apex deponent is required to state in the affidavit in order to trigger the apex deposition doctrine. Must the affidavit state that he/she does not have ANY knowledge of relevant facts, rather than saying that he/she does not have any UNIQUE OR SUPERIOR knowledge of relevant facts as the Supreme Court said in Alcatel USA ?
At this point, our best chance in getting the court's attention is for the court to be flooded with amicus briefs requesting that the court take this case to resolve the conflict that exists among various courts of appeal. If the Supreme Court does not resolve the confusion that exist is the law at this time, litigants will continue to waste of time and money in fighting apex depositions.
Can you please forward this email to your membership to see if anyone is interested enough to file a quick amicus brief? If anyone is interested, they can contact me or Kirsten Castaneda (214-740-8533) or Gary Powell (214-740-8470) in our Dallas office.
Time is of the essence as the motion for rehearing is due next Friday.
If this is not the proper protocol, I would appreciate hearing from you.
Raul A. Gonzalez
Locke Liddell & Sapp LLP
(512) 305-4746
(512) 391-4746 fax
IMPORTANT/CONFIDENTIAL: This message from the law firm of Locke Liddell Sapp, LLP is intended only for the use of the addressees shown above. It contains information that may be privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that the copying, use or distribution of any information or materials transmitted in or with this message is strictly prohibited. If you received this message by mistake, please immediately call us collect at (214) 740-8000 and destroy the original message. Thank you. |
farmer-d/personal/241. | 5986328.1075854146614.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Wed, 24 May 2000 08:42:00 -0700 (PDT) | yvette.connevey@enron.com | lisa.csikos@enron.com, daren.farmer@enron.com, mary.smith@enron.com, | Astros Tickets Brenda has a few ticket s that she would like to make available to you ,
either for yourselves or for your teams.
First come first serve BUT we would like to distribute these evenly so don't
be stingy!
They are
2 tickets for TONIGHT 7:05 pm vs Philadelphia Phillies
4 tickets for Friday, May 26th 7:05 pm vs Atlanta Braves
2 tickets for Friday, May 26th 7:05 pm vs Atlanta Braves
2 tickets for Saturday, June 3rd 12:15 pm vs White Sox
2 tickets for Tuesday, June 6th 7:05 pm vs Minnesota Twins
2 tickets for Thursday, July 6th 7:05 pm vs Arizona Diamond Backs
2 tickets for Friday, July 21st 7:05 pm vs St. Louis Cardinals
2 tickets for Tuesday, August 15th 7:05 pm vs Pittsburgh Pirates
Thanx!
Y |
kaminski-v/c/mangmt/group/management/136. | 28223709.1075856575735.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Wed, 31 Jan 2001 00:06:00 -0800 (PST) | vince.kaminski@enron.com | kristin.gandy@enron.com | Re: FW: Wharton Resume Submission - Summer Intern Kristin,
Yes, we would like very much to have her as a summer intern.
I can take her ino my group.
Vince
Enron North America Corp.
From: Kristin Gandy @ ENRON 01/26/2001 04:03 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: FW: Wharton Resume Submission - Summer Intern
Vince,
Can you tell me if these candidates will be part of the program? I will
generate an offer letter as soon as I know this information.
Thank you,
kristin
Vince J Kaminski@ECT
01/23/2001 01:23 PM
To: Kristin Gandy/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: FW: Wharton Resume Submission - Summer Intern
Kristin.
Kim is a member of the Tiger Team. She is interested in a summer
internship with Enron and I shall be glad to take her.
Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/23/2001
01:24 PM ---------------------------
"Kim Whitsel" <Kimberly.Whitsel.wg02@wharton.upenn.edu> on 01/22/2001
12:07:35 AM
To: <Christie.Patrick@enron.com>, <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: Wharton Resume Submission
-----Original Message-----
From: Kim Whitsel [mailto:Kimberly.Whitsel.wg02@wharton.upenn.edu]
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 6:51 PM
To: kristin.gandy@enron.com
Subject: Wharton Resume Submission
Summer Position under Wharton Schedule #1823
- Kim Whitsel -Enron Cover Letter.doc
- Kim Whitsel- Wharton2 resume.doc |
dasovich-j/all_documents/11784. | 2542796.1075843451933.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Fri, 27 Apr 2001 09:14:00 -0700 (PDT) | michael.tribolet@enron.com | jeff.dasovich@enron.com | FW: Summary of the MOU -----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff =20
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 7:00 PM
To: Comnes, Alan; Schwarz, Angela; Aden, Beverly; Votaw, Bill; Barreda,=20
Brenda; Moffett, Carol; Corbin, Cathy; Foster, Chris; Liscano, Christina;=
=20
Sutter, Craig; Leff, Dan; Whitehead, Debora; Benevides, Dennis; Black, Don;=
=20
Dorothy Youngblood/HOU/ECT@ECT; Huth, Douglas; Sacks, Edward; Melvin, Eric;=
=20
Dupre, Erika; Hughes, Evan; Deltoro, Fran; Muench, Gayle; Dernehl, Ginger;=
=20
Savage, Gordon; Buchanan, Harold; Kingerski, Harry; Waser, Iris; Steffes,=
=20
James; Lewis, James; Wright, James; Messina, Jeff; Blachman, Jeremy; Hewitt=
,=20
Jess; Hartsoe, Joe; Denne, Karen; Bass, Kathy; Dodgen, Kathy; Gustafson, Ke=
n;=20
Hughes, Kevin; Lopez, Leasa; Botello, Leticia; Muller, Mark; Suggs, Marsha;=
=20
Sunde, Marty; Eggleston, Meredith; Etringer, Michael; Mann, Michael;=20
Cisneros, Michelle; mpalmer@enron.com; Bresnan, Neil; Hong, Neil; Kaufman,=
=20
Paul; Warren, Paula; Zdunkewicz, Richard; Leibert, Richard; Shapiro, Richar=
d;=20
Hennessy, Rita; Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES; Tijerina, Rosalinda; McCubbin,=20
Sandra; Novosel, Sarah; Gahn, Scott; Stoness, Scott; Dick, Sharon;=20
skean@enron.com; Leslie, Tanya; Lair, Tasha; Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT;=20
Greenlee, Terri; Belden, Tim; Spruiell, Tony; Sharp, Vicki; Gorny, Vladimir=
;=20
Curry, Wanda; Bradford, William S.; Corbally, Kathryn; Whalan, Jubran; Rile=
y,=20
Tony; Sanders, Richard; Williams, Robert C.; Wolfe, Greg; Wright, James;=20
VanUlden, Dirk; Walker, Steve; Rudolph, Jennifer; Wenzel, Martin; Douglas=
=20
Condon/SFO/EES@EES; wgang@enron.com; Scott Govenar; Hedy Govenar;=20
jklauber@llgm.com; Smith, Mike; Neslage, John; Guerrero, Janel; Eric=20
Letke/DUB/EES@EES; Sanders, Richard; gfergus@brobeck.com; Tribolet, Michael=
;=20
Frank, Robert; Sanders, Richard; gfergus@brobeck.com; Mara, Susan; Gil,=20
Mercy; Thome, Jennifer; Leboe, David
Subject: Summary of the MOU
The following is an outline of the basic terms of the Southern California=
=20
Edison Memorandum of Understanding:
? Commitment to Provide Power =01) SCE will keep its current generation pla=
nts=20
and other generation assets and commit them to provide power on a regulated=
=20
cost-of-service basis for 10 years.
? Dedication of Power =01) Edison International will commit the entire outp=
ut of=20
Sunrise (one of Edison International=01,s non-regulated generating faciliti=
es)=20
to the State on a fixed price basis for 10 years. Phase I of Sunrise is to =
be=20
brought online by August 15, 2001. If not brought online by August 15, 2001=
,=20
Edison International shall be assessed a $2 million penalty.
? Transmission Sale =01) SCE will sell to the State its transmission assets=
for=20
approximately $2.76 billion (2.3 times the net book value of the assets),=
=20
subject to certain adjustments. Of the $2.76 billion, the $1.5 billion gain=
=20
on sale, will be used to reduce SCE=01,s net undercollected amount as of Ja=
nuary=20
31, 2001. In connection with the purchase, the State will also assume certa=
in=20
liabilities associated with the transmission assets.
? Backup Transaction =01) If the transmission sale does not occur within tw=
o=20
years for reasons beyond the parties=01, control, then if the State elects,=
SCE=20
shall sell to the State SCE=01,s hydro generation assets. If the hydro asse=
ts=20
are not worth $1.5 billion, then SCE will also sell the state after Decembe=
r=20
31, 2010 enough below-market-price-power to make up the shortfall.
? Conservation Property =01) SCE shall grant perpetual conservation easemen=
ts to=20
the State covering approximately 260,000 acres of its Big Creek hydroelectr=
ic=20
related lands and 825 acres of its Eastern Sierra hydroelectric related=20
lands. Some of the land may be deeded in fee.
? Contribution by Edison International =01) Edison International will refun=
d to=20
SCE not less than $400 million. This money will consist of a refund of=20
approximately $293 million in estimated 2000 quarterly tax payments plus=20
approximately $197 million in federal loss carryback tax savings.
? Investment =01) Edison International and SCE will invest not less than $3=
=20
billion over the next 5 years in capital improvements for SCE.
? Litigation =01) SCE shall dismiss certain claims, including its takings a=
nd=20
filed rate doctrine cases.
? CPUC Regulation =01) CPUC shall continue to regulate SCE using historical=
=20
principles of ratemaking.
? Payment for Portion of QF Drop-off =01) SCE shall pay an amount that=20
represents that portion of the net short from January 18, 2001 to April 1,=
=20
2001 that is attributable to QF=01,s not selling to SCE (due to SCE=01,s fa=
ilure to=20
pay the QF=01,s). SCE will securitize this amount.
? Securitization =01) SCE shall securitize its full net undercollected amou=
nt=20
(approx. $3.5 billion). The securitization shall occur in two tranches (i.=
e.=20
two different nonbypassable dedicated rate components).
? The first tranche will occur after the passage of legislation and the=20
signing of the definitive agreements and will cover the net undercollected=
=20
amount, less the gain on sale, plus interest on certain obligations in the=
=20
net undercollected amount.
? The second tranche would be triggered if the transmission sale does not=
=20
occur within two years. Accordingly, the second tranche would not show up =
in=20
rates for two years, if at all.
? Buying the Net Short =01) The State will be required to buy the net short=
=20
through December 31, 2002. After 2002 SCE will be responsible for covering=
=20
the net short.
? Investment Recovery =01) SCE shall have an authorized rate of return that=
will=20
not drop below its current rte (11.6%) during the 10 year cost of service=
=20
ratemaking period.
? Next Steps (Definitive Agreements and CPUC Action):
? Definitive Agreements =01) Once the MOU is signed, the next stage is to=
=20
negotiate definitive agreements which contain the specific terms of the=20
transmission sale, as well as the specific terms of the various other relat=
ed=20
agreements (e.g., the O&M Agreement, Transmission Services Agreement and th=
e=20
Facilities Services Agreement).
? CPUC Action =01) Prior to entering into the definitive agreements, the CP=
UC=20
must undertake certain actions (which include: establishing mechanisms for=
=20
preapproval of procurement costs and URG costs, deferring SCE=01,s general =
rate=20
case until 2003, granting SCE some relief from direct access credits and=20
clarifying the first priority condition in the holding company act). |
fossum-d/all_documents/391. | 17178803.1075842431582.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Mon, 10 Jul 2000 07:39:00 -0700 (PDT) | drew.fossum@enron.com | steven.harris@enron.com, kevin.hyatt@enron.com, lorraine.lindberg@enron.com | Pueblo Just got an update on the project that won't go away. Dennis has a meeting
lined up with DOE decisionmakers on the 25th. He is going to pitch the
project as an approximately 100 mw power plant, to be owned by (read
"financed by") DOE, with the gas pipeline owned by Dennis and\or third
parties (read "Enron"?). Dennis has run economics that show the DOE will get
a more than 10% cost savings on the project compared to current PNM rates,
even assuming a fairly high gas transport cost because of the smaller gas
load. How did he do it? Very easy: they ran the power plant economics
using about a $2.00 gas cost instead of current, real world prices. Dennis'
argument is going to be: "I'll take the risk on building the pipeline and
the power plant at a capped cost, and then sell the power plant to you."
"You take the risk on gas cost: if gas cost tracks the 18-24 month average,
you will realize your 10% cost savings, but if current fuel costs continue or
escalate, you lose." Either way, your reliability improves and you kick
PNM in the shins." Dennis and Tino apparently think they can sell DOE on
this. By the way, their current story on Richardson is that he won't resign,
and won't be forced out by the administration because that would create even
more publicity. You'll love this: they think Richardson is even more likely
to sign off on the deal now because his chances of being nominated for VP or
cabinet are dead and he now has nothing to lose in DC. They think his real
angle is now to bring home the bacon to New Mexico and then run for governor
out there!! Apparently the rank and file out in the home state think he got
hosed and made a scapegoat unfairly.
I've asked Lorna Brennan to pull some historical San Juan prices together
to give to Tino to confirm whether his $2 price is wacky. Other than that, I
just told Tino that we are potentially interested in the pipeline part of the
project if the risks and rewards make sense, and that EE&CC might be
interested in the design/build on all of it. He said he'd get back to me
after the 25th meeting and tell me whether the project is undead. DF |
kaminski-v/all_documents/10760. | 21266611.1075856779087.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Tue, 18 Jan 2000 00:58:00 -0800 (PST) | vince.kaminski@enron.com | richard.causey@enron.com | Global Risk Management Initiative Rick,
I read your memo regarding Global Risk Management Initiative. I am sending
you the
information regarding a related initiative on which I have been working last
year and which
is moving now into the implementation stage. It's Enterprise - Wide Risk
Management
and it's really an effort to measure business risks consistently across the
company.
I hope my group can be helpful in designing the general approach to this
problem.
Please, let me know what your thoughts are.
Vince |
arnold-j/hp/12. | 1198807.1075849629790.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Mon, 18 Dec 2000 00:52:00 -0800 (PST) | sarah-joy.hunter@enron.com | jennifer.medcalf@enron.com | FW: FW: Fedex and other cross sells UPDATE Jennifer:
If you are referring to the Wireless call, I was on the call and actively
participated with Peter G. I had the agenda discussion items and guided the
conversation. The call was brief and enabled HP and Peter G. to discuss
wireless initiatives briefly. Then Peter G. literally read from my notes the
"message" you gave him about the need for HP to support the process on both
the buy and sell sides.
The call went well, message was delivered and Darrin will follow up with HP
so they can come in to Enron and present the wireless intiative.
Greg Pyle and Bill Lovejoy (but not Gerry Cashiola) were on the call. Greg
Pyle made a note of saying that HP realized that they were going to have to
fully support the process on both the buy and sell sides.
I will still connect back with Greg Pyle by phone.
SJ
-----Original Message-----
From: Medcalf, Jennifer
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2000 8:40 AM
To: Hunter, Sarah-joy
Subject: Re: FW: Fedex and other cross sells UPDATE
Sarah-Joy,
I would contact Greg Pyle and find out what took place on the conference call.
Have a Happy and safe Christmas!
Jennifer
Sarah-joy Hunter/ENRON@enronXgate 12/18/2000 08:40 AM To: Jennifer
Medcalf/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: FW: Fedex and other cross sells UPDATE
Jennifer:
In my absence, the only issues I expect to arise are the Fedex and HP deals.
For FEDEX: (cross sell) I will be speaking with Buck McGugan, VP of sales,
Carmen Perez's boss's boss this morning at his office in Chicago.
847-215-4241. This is a follow up call to the calls from different Fedex
business units which I have received.
(buy side--John Will) I forwarded John's latest update earlier this week
then his note below. First, he had several conference calls with George
Wasaff to John Pattillo. John Pattillo had committed to getting back to John
on Friday (he didn't) with the specifics of ABS' counter offer to FEDEX.
John's e-mail below notes that on Friday 12/15 by noon he heard nothing back
from Pattillo. Second, John is to hear back from Carmen Perez today, Fedex
account rep, on any news from Fedex lawyers and team regarding Fedex's
response to lawsuit issue update. Third, George Wasaff has made himself
available to fly to Memphis with John this week if necessary and if this will
help resolve the lawsuit issue in our favor. Fourth, John has been told to
begin to pull back business from FEDEX in terms of the GSS contractual
relationship. I've asked John to keep us in the loop on the developments
with these four items and what he finally decides to do 12/22 on the Fedex
account.
HP: Wireless conference call with Peter G. went fine. Peter G. has asked
Darrin to set up a follow up meeting with HP after 1/8/01 when the Enron
wireless team returns from London. This is in progress. EFS/Datawarehouse
equipment meeting set for early Jan. Spoke with Peter G.
I spoke with Bill Dwyer directly last week and he would welcome the
opportunity to work more closely with Enron but would want to work in concert
with the sales force. My e-mailed question to you was as follows: Do we
just wait to hear back from Greg Pyle given your phone call to him and Peter
G. message delivered to him on 12/14?
Kinko's: Connected Mike Rabon to Kinko's CIO via conference call. That
enables the EBS proposition to move forward with Kinko's. Also, connected Ed
Quinn and Chris Charbonneau to VP of purchasing. He is the initial decision
maker. Chris Charbonneau and I got on a follow up conference call with VP of
Purchasing and found that he had already received a business proposition from
EIM Pulp & Paper team 9 months ago. But, the offer was not as competitive as
the options offered by the Kinko's paper mills. Ed and Chris have some
homework to do to improve the offer and get back to the VP of Purchasing.
Once we get past this initial hurdle, I will work with Quinn and Charbonneau
on getting to the CFO's office as necessary. So, both sides are moving
foward here.
Also, had Ed Quinn meet with Craig Brown and Tracy F. on office automation
(pulled Jeff Youngflesh up to speed as well) since he couldn't attend the
meeting. Ed had some great ideas for the process.
Continental: Wasaff will speak briefly with Ron Howard on Wednesday at 1:30
PM as a follow up thank-you. Meeting minutes sent out. Will be working with
Craig Breslau and T. Ramsey in early Jan. meeting to get info. needed for
airline ticket for fuel mgt. swap deal going. Also, followup up with Tawney,
Taylor, and Engberg (plastics) in early Jan. Plastics will also be coming to
GSS/BD to give educational overview.
CSC, Sonoco, Instromet followup in Jan. 2001.
Have a great holiday! I will be checking my work voicemail daily weekdays
(except Christmas day).
Sarah-Joy
-----Original Message-----
From: Will, John
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 12:44 PM
To: Hunter, Sarah-joy
Subject: Re: Fedex
Sarah-Joy,
No news from John Patillo yet.
jw
Sarah-joy Hunter/ENRON@enronXgate 12/15/00 10:17 AM To: John
Will/NA/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Fedex
John:
Good Morning!
Per our conversation yesterday, you had noted that John Pattillo would be
getting back to you with his decision as to how he would approach FEDEX with
an Enron counteroffer. Any news on this?
Also, thanks for leaving voicemail/e-mail messages to keep me in the loop
regarding:
a) John Pattillo's decision 12/14;
b) Carmen's feedback by close of business Monday 12/18
c) what you finally decide to do before leaving for the holidays 12/22
d) if you follow up on George Wasaff's offer to fly to Memphis next week if
necessary
and e) if you need to pull back on Enron's contracts with Fedex.
Appreciate it.
Sarah-Joy |
dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5787. | 23592267.1075843759703.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Wed, 17 Jan 2001 06:56:00 -0800 (PST) | teece@haas.berkeley.edu | teece@haas.berkeley.edu | URGENT - Electricity Crisis Workshop To:? Workshop Participants
Attached are additional articles that should be added to your reading list.
1)??????"High Electricity Prices in the West: What Can Be Done About It?", by
Shmuel Oren and Pablo T. Spiller.?
2)??????"Electricity Market Reform in California", by John D. Chandley, Scott
M. Harvey, and William W. Hogan.?
Sincerely,
David Teece
P.S.? Directions and parking instructions will be sent to you shortly.
- High Elec Prices.doc
- Electricity Mkt Reform.pdf
======================================
David J. Teece, Director
Institute of Management, Innovation and Organization
F402 Haas School of Business #1930
University of California, Berkeley
Berkeley, CA 94720-1930
Phone: (510) 642-1075
Fax: (510) 642-2826
http://haas.berkeley.edu/~imio
====================================== |
geaccone-t/inbox/432. | 31915738.1075862425053.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Tue, 6 Nov 2001 10:51:51 -0800 (PST) | james.saunders@enron.com | a..howard@enron.com, tracy.geaccone@enron.com | RE: Pipeline investments both have investments in financial instruments; but they are in support of the base pipeline business
both have a huge stake in enron via ene notes!!
-----Original Message-----
From: Howard, Kevin A.
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 12:06 PM
To: Geaccone, Tracy; Saunders, James
Subject: Pipeline investments
Does TPC or NNG have any investments in any non-pipeline assets (financial or otherwise)? I was not aware of any but we need to disclose these. |
guzman-m/notes_inbox/799. | 25686795.1075840710146.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Thu, 8 Mar 2001 01:38:00 -0800 (PST) | pete.davis@enron.com | pete.davis@enron.com | Start Date: 3/8/01; HourAhead hour: 10; <CODESITE> Start Date: 3/8/01; HourAhead hour: 10; No ancillary schedules awarded. No
variances detected.
LOG MESSAGES:
PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001030810.txt |
kean-s/calendar/untitled/7739. | 27448563.1075847971479.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Wed, 7 Mar 2001 06:44:00 -0800 (PST) | janel.guerrero@enron.com | steven.kean@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com, mark.palmer@enron.com, | story on muni opposition to summer blackouts. PG&E could face mutiny on outages: SMUD, others may balk if
utility orders summer blackouts
By Carrie Peyton Bee Staff Writer (Published March 7, 2001)
Sacramento's electric utility wants out of a deal that imposes
rolling blackouts locally on PG&E's command.
So do a lot of other utilities.
They've been writing letters, lobbying lawmakers and launching
informal talks with Pacific Gas and Electric Co. to get off the hook
before summer.
Who dodges the blackout bullet "is going to play out as a political
hot button" around the state, said George Fraser, head of the
Northern California Power Agency, a coalition of municipal utilities.
In Sacramento, the next volley is expected soon, with the
Sacramento Municipal Utility District reportedly poised to notify
PG&E that it will no longer black out homes and businesses on the
larger utility's command.
"We are absolutely trying to fight off the requirement for rolling
blackouts for the Sacramento area," said Linda Davis, one of seven
elected members of the SMUD board of directors.
Saying they don't want to be dragged down by somebody else's
problems, two Southern California utilities have written grid
operators asking to be exempted from any blackouts caused by
PG&E's or Southern California Edison's financial woes.
But in PG&E's view, "California is in an energy crisis (and) ... we're
all in this together," said spokesman John Nelson.
The maneuvering comes amid bleak forecasts for power supplies
this summer.
Although Gov. Gray Davis has said conservation, new power plants
and moderate weather could avert blackouts, officials at the
Independent System Operator, which runs much of California's grid,
expect frequent rotating outages.
One consulting firm, Cambridge Energy Research Associates,
predicts 20 hours of rolling blackouts during July and August, and
about 200 hours of especially intense calls for voluntary cutbacks.
Before blackouts hit, the jockeying over just whose lights, air
conditioners and assembly lines will be shut down is growing. The
outcome could affect millions of people statewide.
The state Public Utilities Commission is probing rolling blackout
programs run by the for-profit utilities it regulates, including PG&E
and Edison.
A PUC analysis has suggested that PG&E's program, which
currently exempts about 40 percent of its customers, should
spread the burden more broadly. For example, it said, 1.9 million
homes and businesses are spared just because they share a
circuit with a customer deemed "essential."
But not-for-profit utilities such as SMUD, which answer to their own
elected boards or city councils, have other worries.
Many have already lined up their power supplies for summer. Some
have raised rates or are considering raising rates. Some have taken
extra conservation steps. They think those preparations ought to
give them leverage to ease blackout clauses in their contracts with
PG&E.
SMUD general manager Jan Schori "is going to use every avenue
... any avenue, to put pressure on," including lobbying the ISO, the
governor and others, said utility director Davis.
The Northern California Power Agency, a joint-powers authority that
owns and operates power plants for municipal utilities, has begun
informal negotiations with PG&E to change blackout rules,
according to Fraser, its top executive.
It is preparing to write PG&E, asking that its members be
exempted from outages altogether. Failing that, it wants them to
face fewer outages or to be compensated for cutting off power, he
said.
At SMUD, the utility board has met in closed session to discuss
exactly what it is required to do during electric emergencies, under
terms of the interconnection contract that links SMUD's lines to
PG&E's.
"The contracts are being inspected with a fine-tooth comb," said
SMUD director Howard Posner.
Schori declined to comment on any specifics. Sources indicated
that the main option being considered is notifying PG&E that
because of changed circumstances, SMUD believes it no longer is
required to routinely comply with outage requests.
Other options being explored include re-negotiating existing
agreements with PG&E.
Posner said that ever since two days of rolling blackouts in
January, constituents have been asking him, " 'Why are we
participating when we're not the problem?' And I don't have a good
answer to that."
Several directors said SMUD has already spent a lot of money --
and is considering 16 percent rate increases -- to ensure that it has
enough electricity under contract to meet its customers' summer
demands. They believe PG&E should do the same.
"We're almost like a David against Goliath here," said board vice
president Genevieve Shiroma. "The huge investor-owned utilities
next door have severe problems that they need to get under
control."
In addition, SMUD plans to argue that because it can cut usage
through its "Peak Corps" program, which remotely turns off air
conditioners at volunteer households, it has already done its part
without rotating outages, director Davis said.
PG&E believes the interconnection agreements that govern smaller
utilities' ties to its transmission lines have "benefits and burdens to
both sides," said Nelson.
"It wouldn't be fair or good policy for just one provision to be altered
without taking a look at how that affects the entire contract," he
said.
Interconnection contracts generally have clauses that require
utilities to help each other out to avert greater emergencies.
Sometimes reducing demand -- called load shedding -- can be the
only way to stabilize the electric grid in the seconds after a major
power plant or transmission line fails.
"It's been around in the electrical fabric forever," said Jim Pope,
head of Silicon Valley Power, Santa Clara's city-run utility. In
addition to legal requirements, "you have a moral obligation so you
don't bring the system to collapse."
Like other city-run utilities, Silicon Valley Power has a contract
with PG&E that requires it to shed load during an electric
emergency. But its contract allows it to work with big users to
reduce their demand, so no one has to be completely shut off.
Such agreements, formed long before deregulation when PG&E ran
the north state's grid, now are complicated by the 1997 creation of
the state Independent System Operator. The ISO today runs
pieces of the grid owned by PG&E, Edison, and San Diego Gas &
Electric Co.
If it believes power use is about to surge past supply, potentially
triggering a grid collapse across the western United States, the
ISO notifies the three utilities that they have to shed a certain
number of megawatts.
The big utilities meet that requirement two ways. They cut circuits
to some of their own customers, and they tell smaller, connected
utilities to cut a proportionate share.
In Northern California, about 80 percent of the outages are borne by
PG&E customers and the rest by customers of SMUD and other
municipal utilities and irrigation districts.
"In one sense, we are all in this together. If SMUD were in danger
of going down, we would hope others would help us out," said
SMUD's Posner. "But that's if we're in danger from circumstances
beyond our control, not from mismanagement or lack of financial
wherewithal."
It is unclear what penalties, if any, a utility would face for violating
an interconnection agreement. In the long run, the issue would be
fought either in the courts or before the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, grid officials said.
As a practical matter, in the seconds when the risk to the grid is
greatest, if one utility refused to shed load, the ISO would probably
solve to problem by calling on PG&E, Edison or others who are
willing to make deeper cutbacks, they said. |
germany-c/sent/107. | 18937786.1075853785221.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Thu, 30 Nov 2000 00:27:00 -0800 (PST) | chris.germany@enron.com | john.singer@enron.com, mary.franklin@enron.com, angie.zeman@enron.com, | Singer Deal Tetco M2 The following info was provided to me by Leah Moss at Tetco.
Meters 71979 and 71980 are on non-contiguous laterals. Tetco doesn't know
how this gas flows. They are still checking into this one. It may actually
flow into CNG.,
Meters 72554 and 72803 are "normal" Tetco M2 meters. This gas is a backhaul
to Winridge and Hooker [make sure you use the backhaul contract] and a
forwardhaul to Delmont and Oakford. The forwardhaul fuel is 4.11%. |
jones-t/all_documents/146. | 2609409.1075846914083.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Thu, 22 Jul 1999 10:17:00 -0700 (PDT) | tana.jones@enron.com | mark.elliott@enron.com | Your Phone In order to get you phone service here, the phone people want your passport
number since you don't have a social security number. Can you provide it to
Joyce Dorsey, an assistant here in Legal. She's working with Sylvia to get
your office set up. Thanks! |
allen-p/deleted_items/131. | 21588317.1075858633308.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Mon, 22 Oct 2001 13:45:07 -0700 (PDT) | important_phone_call@response.etracks.com | pallen@enron.com | We're Going "Nuts" We're Going "Nuts" [IMAGE] We have been trying to reach you regarding your sweepstakes entry! To contact us call, Toll Free 1-800-792-1321 Use Your Private Code when you call: DLIMZ Call 10:00 am to 10:00 pm EST Monday through Friday, 9:00 am to 9:00 pm on Saturday CALL NOW!!! 1-800-792-1321 This offer is brought to you by Consolidated Media Services. For more information and the terms and conditions of the promotional offer brought to you by CMS click here .If you do not wish to receive future mailings, click here to unsubscribe. |
kean-s/calendar/untitled/1676. | 19254492.1075846316201.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Mon, 23 Oct 2000 02:54:00 -0700 (PDT) | margaret.allen@enron.com | meredith.philipp@enron.com, steven.kean@enron.com, mark.palmer@enron.com | Arena speaking points Hello,
Here are the speaking points and agenda for the meeting today. Each person
speaking has received a copy. Please let me know if you have any questions,
MSA |
jones-t/all_documents/4538. | 30809697.1075847024707.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Tue, 17 Oct 2000 05:28:00 -0700 (PDT) | petej@andrews-kurth.com | mary.cook@enron.com | L: ISDA Agreement - Wabash Valley Power - ENA.DOC Mary,
Attached please find a draft letter to local counsel requesting information
with respect to Wabash Valley Power Association. Please call me at
713-220-4124 with any comments.
Thanks,
Jason
- LISDAAgr.DOC |