file
stringlengths 12
52
| Message_ID
stringlengths 39
43
| Date
stringlengths 36
37
| Sender
stringlengths 10
59
| Receiver
stringlengths 0
6.58k
| MESSAGE
stringlengths 3
2.01M
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
germany-c/inbox/74. | 32642405.1075840506207.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Tue, 21 May 2002 18:51:31 -0700 (PDT) | chris_germany61@hotmail.com | chris.germany@enron.com | Fwd: Your baby's WebNursery is ready! >From: <babynotes@growingfamily.com>
>To: <CHRIS_GERMANY61@HOTMAIL.COM>
>Subject: Your baby's WebNursery is ready!
>Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 12:00:51 -0400
>
>Hello
>
>Congratulations on the birth of your new baby! We are happy to inform you
>that your baby's web
>page has just been posted to Growing Family WebNursery.
>
>Be sure to check out the great "Parents Personalize It" options available
>which allow you to add
>some special touches to the page. You will be able to:
>
>? Update your baby's name (i.e. James to Jimmy)
>? Edit your baby's information (i.e. weight, length, etc.)
>? Add a welcome message for those who visit the page
>? Use "Announce It" to send family and friends an invitation to visit the
>page
>? For added security, you may password protect the page
>
>Just click on this link to get to your "Parents Personalize It" page.
>http://www.growingfamily.com/admin/parent/parentlogin.asp
>You will be asked for the ID number that was given to you at the hospital.
>
>To go directly to your baby's first web page, simply click on the following
>link
>http://www.growingfamily.com/webnursery/babypage.asp?UrlID=0U0X1E7K6M
>
>If you do not link directly to the page, type the line above into the
>address field on your web
>browser.
>
>Your baby's web page will remain active at this link for 60 days. Visit it
>often to see all the
>wonderful messages your friends and family may leave for your new baby.
>
>If you have any questions about your baby's web page or would like to order
>a photo package at
>this time, please call 1-800-325-3550 for assistance.
>
>Again, congratulations on the birth of your new baby!
>Best Wishes,
>The Growing Family Staff
>http://www.growingfamily.com
_________________________________________________________________
Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com |
jones-t/all_documents/12377. | 1530053.1075847394515.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Wed, 6 Jun 2001 03:03:00 -0700 (PDT) | esmeralda.gonzalez@enron.com | susan.bailey@enron.com, marie.heard@enron.com, tana.jones@enron.com, | Canada Report Good morning ladies:
Just wanted to send out a friendly reminder to please provide Mary Cook with
Canada reports by the end of the day on Thursday. Thanks.
Esmeralda Gonzalez
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB3815
Houston, Texas 77002
e-mail: esmeralda.gonzalez@enron.com
Phone: 713-345-7621
Fax: 713-646-3393 |
kaminski-v/deleted_items/148. | 11733409.1075840752156.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Thu, 24 Jan 2002 21:45:58 -0800 (PST) | enerfaxtext@enerfax.com | vkamins@enron.com | Natural Gas Futures Dip Slightly Lower vkamins@enron.com, To unsubscribe send a blank mailto:leave-enerfaxtext-16362929Y@relay.netatlantic.com
Enerfax Daily
NORTH AMERICA'S FREE POWER AND GAS INFORMATION SOURCE
Friday, January 25 2002 No. 920
Visit: http://www.enerfax.com to view our web version or for Oil Prices &
News http://www.enerfaxgold.com
PHYSICAL NATURAL GAS PRICES
Gulf/Eastern Region
| Agua Dulce | 2.02 |
| ANR SE | 2.06 |
| Carthage TG | 2.07 |
| Chicago Citygate | 2.13 |
| Columbia Gulf Onshore | 2.10 |
| Dominion South Point | 2.21 |
| Henry Hub | 2.12 |
| Houston Ship Channel | 2.16 |
| Katy Hub | 2.10 |
| NGPL LA Pool | 2.06 |
| NGPL - Midcontinent | 2.02 |
| NGPL STX | 2.05 |
| NGPL TX/OK | 2.05 |
| NNG Demarc. | 2.07 |
| Niagara | 2.26 |
| Sonat Tier 1 | 2.09 |
| TCO IPP Pool | 2.21 |
| Tetco ELa | 2.09 |
| Tetco M-3 | 2.38 |
| Tetco STX | 2.02 |
| TGP Zone 0 | 2.02 |
| TGP Zone 1 (500 Leg) | 2.05 |
| TGT Zone SL | 2.10 |
| New York Citygate | 2.41 |
| Transco Station 65 | 2.15 |
| Transco Zone 6 (NY) | 2.42 |
| Trunk ELa | 2.08 |
| Western Region
| California Border | 2.14 |
| El Paso Keystone | 2.02 |
| El Paso San Juan-Blanco | 2.01 |
| Waha Hub | 2.05 |
| Canadian/Rockies Region
| Nova/Aeco (C$/gig) | 2.89 |
| Dawn Hub/Union | 2.22 |
| Northwest Stanfield | 2.04 |
| Wyoming Pool | 1.92 |
| Opal | 1.93 |
| PGT-Malin | 2.11 |
| Sumas | 2.04 |
Flow Date 1/25
-------------------------------------------------------------
NATURAL GAS FUTURES
Henry Hub
12 Month Strip 2.4563 -0.0036
18 Month Strip 2.6063 -0.0014
| Month | High | Low | Close | Change |
| FEB | 2.150 | 2.025 | 2.048 | -0.028 |
| MAR | 2.170 | 2.070 | 2.090 | +0.001 |
| APR | 2.240 | 2.150 | 2.166 | +0.004 |
| MAY | 2.330 | 2.259 | 2.259 | -0.001 |
| JUN | 2.390 | 2.332 | 2.332 | +0.000 |
| JUL | 2.470 | 2.408 | 2.408 | -0.002 |
| AUG | 2.520 | 2.461 | 2.461 | -0.002 |
| SEP | 2.535 | 2.473 | 2.463 | -0.012 |
| OCT | 2.570 | 2.500 | 2.505 | -0.002 |
| NOV | 2.810 | 2.740 | 2.742 | +0.000 |
| DEC | 3.010 | 2.950 | 2.954 | +0.000 |
| JAN | 3.110 | 3.035 | 3.048 | -0.001 |
-------------------------------------------------------------
-
RISK MANAGEMENT
Across the Energy Enterprise
e-Acumen, Inc., is uniquely positioned to help you manage risk and
increase value. That's because our analytics, data and applications cover
all strategic aspects of the energy enterprise, from short-term
forecasting to comprehensive risk analysis and portfolio optimization, to
asset valuation and weather risk management. Dedicated to the needs
of energy and trading companies in a dynamic and competitive world, our
approach combines best-in-class physical fundamentals with
industry-leading statistical methodologies.
e-Acumen is a venture-backed company founded in January, 1997. Since then
we have listened attentively to the market and assembled a stellar cast of
seasoned energy industry professionals and Silicon Valley technologists.
Join us as we help the industry continue its path toward liquidity and
profitable, risk-managed growth in the exciting years ahead!
Click here to find out more about current special offers, or go to
http://www.e-acumen.com
-------------------------------------------------------------
Natural Gas Futures Dip Slightly Lower
Natural gas for February delivery on the NYMEX ended down $0.024
yesterday to $2.048 per MMBtu. The March contract gained $0.001 to $2.09
per MMBtu. The market began the day higher on early short-covering, but
fell off sharply in the afternoon after an extended forecast called for
mild weather across much of the nation. Last week the AGA reported 124 Bcf
of natural gas was withdrawn from storage, leaving about a Tcf more still
in the ground than a year ago. Look for the market to take-out the $2.00
support level soon. Natural gas for next day delivery across the US and
Canada was generally flat to $0.05 higher yesterday. Natural gas for next
day delivery at the Henry hub gained $0.01 to $2.12 per MMBtu. Look for
cash prices to weaken ahead of the weekend, likely leading futures prices
lower as well. With some cold in the Northeast and Midwest, but mild
temperatures forecast for the next two weeks, traders expect to see spot
prices at a discount to futures by the weekend. Turn-back volumes could
also weaken prices. By the end of January storage operators face
requirements to withdraw gas out of storage, the extra volumes hitting the
market could push prices further down.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Exploit the enterprise-wide transaction management power deployed by the
big names in gas.
NUCLEUS Software
ZAINET Gasmaster
The most comprehensive, totally-integrated natural gas information system
available today.
Ask about out limited-time offer competitive upgrade program.
CAMINUS
Your Competitive Edge in Energy.
Call Caminus at (212)515-3700 or visit the website at
http://www.caminus.com
-------------------------------------------------------------
Today's Power Bulletins
* Court to Hear Arguments Today on Whether Federal Bankruptcy Law Permits
Wholesale Preemption of State Law and Regulation Necessary for PG&E's
Reorganization Plan to Be Confirmed
* Shell WindEnergy Acquires $30 Million, 80 MW Wind Power Facility in
North Texas from Cielo Wind Power
* Virginia Electric Sells $650 Million in 5-Year Notes
* Arch Coal 4th Quarter Earnings Drop 13% on Warm Weather and Weak Demand
* PG&E Says Consumer Advocacy Group, TURN, Misstating Truth, Manipulating
Facts, and Ultimately Concocting Fairy Tale About Its Bankruptcy Case
* APX Exceeds 500 Million MWh in 2001 Power Transaction Processing
* GE Power Systems Completes Acquisition of Bently Nevada
* Sempra Energy Announces Record 2001 Earnings of $2.52 per Share for
2001, Up 22%
-------------------------------------------------------------
DO YOU JUST SEE TREES? WE SEE A FOREST!
See the forest with NewEnergy MarketPower by efficiently obtaining
information for critical market-based investment decisions and mitigate
your risk.
Use MarketPower to determine the effects of transmission congestion, fuel
costs, generator availability and load growth on market prices to better
execute your company's strategic direction.
Designed specifically for today's energy industry, MarketPower is accurate
and easy-to-use, so you can plan for tomorrow...today!
New Ideas...New Solutions...NewEnergy.
For a free 30-day trial visit us at
http://www.NewEnergyAssoc.com/justdownloadit or call us at 770 779 2957
for more information
-------------------------------------------------------------
Enron Creditors Want Andersen Investigation
Enron's creditors' committee has asked the bankruptcy judge for
permission to investigate Andersen to help it prepare possible legal
action against the accounting firm. The committee wants to force Andersen
officials to testify and turn over documents. It was appointed last month
by the US Trustee's office, an arm of the Justice Department. Creditors,
which are owed $40 billion, are concerned that Enron may be worth less
than they thought. Andersen's CEO sent an auditing expert in his place to
testify yesterday before Congress on the destruction of documents related
to Enron. Another witness, David Duncan, a fired Andersen executive,
invoked his 5th Amendment rights against self-incrimination and refused to
testify at the hearing.
-------------------------------------------------------------
FAST. FLEXIBLE. PROVEN.
The AURORA(TM) electric market model helps you deal with the challenges
and risks of today's energy marketplace.
Exceptionally fast and easy to learn, AURORA(TM) reflects fundamental
market drivers and gives power marketers, resource developers and
portfolio managers a better way to manage against market uncertainty and
price volatility.
AURORA delivers -
? Price forecasts - hourly, daily, weekly, monthly, yearly
? On-peak, off-peak pricing
? Resource valuation and net power costs
? Portfolio analyses
? Capacity expansion analyses
? Effects of emissions
? And much more . . .
AURORA's comprehensive databases cover all electricity markets throughout
the U.S. and Canada. The model also handles storage, congestion pricing,
and offers detailed reporting and data export capabilities. It can be used
as a stand-alone tool or be integrated with your other business tools.
Visit us at http://ww.epis.com or call (503) 722-2023.
EPIS, Inc.
Market Information Solutions for the Electric Power Marketplace
-------------------------------------------------------------
Natural Gas NYMEX Volume
02FEB 46,009
02MAR 22,123
02APR 10,532
02MAY 3,709
02JUN 4,779
02JLY 7,017
02AUG 2,174
02SEP 1,776
02OCT 3,932
02NOV 2,376
02DEC 1,245
03JAN 2,075
03FEB 722
03MAR 1,623
03APR 380
03MAY 533
03JUN 283
03JLY 85
03AUG 137
03SEP 224
03OCT 354
03NOV 113
03DEC 186
04JAN 183
-------------------------------------------------------------
GET REAL about energy risk management with KWI
In today's fast moving energy markets you need to be able to manage risk
in real time.
That means knowing before you hit a risk problem, not afterwards when it
may be too late to prevent big losses spreading right through your
enterprise.
With kW3000(tm), our multi-commodity, integrated front to back office
software, you can monitor your Profit At Risk(tm), counterparty risk and
mark-to-market all in real time.
Keep alert to risk. Do it in real time. Call KWI -Americas:
+1-281-681-3301 / Europe: +44 (0) 20-7386-2700 / Asia Pacific: +61(0)
2-9976-6111
http://www.kwi.com
--------------------------------------------------------------
Enron's Top Management Departs
As Enron struggles to survive, its top executives have been bailing
out. Of the 14 executives named in the company's annual 10-K filing with
the SEC last April, about half are gone. Vice Chairman Mark Frevert said
that he left the company at the end of December and seems uncertain
whether he quit or was fired. Greg Whalley, president and COO, will join
Swiss bank UBS which has acquired Enron's trading unit. Former CEO Jeffrey
Skilling and former Vice Chairman Clifford Baxter left the company last
year and Chairman Kenneth Lay resigned 2 days ago, in what some see as an
attempt to stave off the appointment of a bankruptcy trustee. A trustee
would supersede Enron's top management and its board of directors and
would likely name a new law firm to replace Enron's current bankruptcy
attorneys. A coalition of creditors has petitioned a bankruptcy judge to
appoint a Chapter 11 trustee to run Enron. To have a trustee appointed,
creditors must prove management's actions have been inept or fraudulent.
Document shredding and a suspected cover up of the company's true
financial liabilities could be adequate grounds to name a trustee. Lay's
departure leaves CFO Jeff McMahon and Stan Horton, chairman and CEO of
Enron Global Services in charge of the company for now. Enron plans to
hire a turnaround specialist to run the company until a permanent
replacement is chosen. Three consulting firms that specialize in turning
around failing businesses have been mentioned as possible front-runners.
They are Alvarez & Marsal, Glass & Associates and Zolfo Cooper.
-------------------------------------------------------------
ENERGY.
@ENERGY(r), FEA's Complete Suite of Energy Products,
BUILT FOR THE FUTURE.
*Manage all your energy risks.
*Build and Price deals.
*Value physical assets (generation, storage, etc.)
*Report and reduce your energy risks
FEA
FINANCIAL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES Inc.
http://www.fea.com/?cId=17
main phone number: 1 510-548-6200
email address: info@fea.com
-------------------------------------------------------------
PHYSICAL POWER PRICES
| | High | Low | Average |
| | $/MWh | $/MWh | $/MWh |
| Cinergy | 18.50 | 17.00 | 17.90 |
| ECAR | 20.50 | 16.50 | 18.60 |
| ERCOT | 20.00 | 17.60 | 18.10 |
| Entergy | 17.60 | 17.20 | 17.30 |
| TVA | 20.90 | 17.60 | 20.40 |
| ComEd | 19.00 | 18.00 | 18.35 |
| Nepool | 28.00 | 27.50 | 27.70 |
| PJM West | 22.35 | 21.00 | 22.00 |
| Main | 19.00 | 16.25 | 18.00 |
| MAPP | 20.00 | 18.50 | 19.15 |
| Palo Verde | 22.15 | 20.25 | 21.25 |
| Mid C | 19.50 | 18.50 | 18.80 |
| COB | 21.25 | 20.75 | 21.00 |
| 4 Corners | 23.00 | 20.25 | 21.65 |
| Mead | 23.25 | 21.00 | 22.00 |
| NP 15 | 23.00 | 21.00 | 22.55 |
| SP 15 | 23.50 | 22.50 | 22.85 |
Power Delivered 1/25
-------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Halts Andersen Shredding
A federal judge has approved a plan from Enron shareholders to prevent
Andersen from shredding any more documents related to Enron's audits. The
judge ruled that plaintiffs lawyers can start taking depositions in 20
days from Andersen employees who were fired or suspended for the document
shredding. Andersen must also file a report with the judge explaining the
shredding at that time. But Andersen argues that it has not completed its
own investigation into the shredding, and depositions related to the
lawsuit should take a back seat to investigations by Congress, the SEC,
the Justice Department and others. The judge also ruled Andersen can shred
no more documents and that the firm must preserve all Enron-related
documents going back to 1994 and that plaintiffs' lawyers can inspect
them. Andersen attorneys assured the judge that the records are under
guard and shredding has ceased. Andersen has admitted that its Houston
staff shredded a significant but undetermined number of documents related
to Enron audits last fall as federal regulators launched probes into
possible accounting improprieties. The company later fired the head of the
Houston office for his role in the shredding and placed several others on
administrative leave. Attorneys for the plaintiffs' want to depose the
former partner and five others. Shareholders have filed a lawsuit against
29 current and former Enron executives and board members for more than $1
billion they gained by selling company stock during a 3-year period prior
its bankruptcy filing. Allegations have emerged that Enron employees
shredded accounting and finance documents as recently as last week. A
hearing on Enron shredding is scheduled for February 5th before federal
bankruptcy judge.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Allegheny Energy Supply Company, Salt River Project (SRP) and Sempra
Energy
Resources announce Open Season for proposed Desert Crossing Gas Storage
and
Transportation System. Open Season for customers interested in capacity
begins Jan. 10, 2002 and extends through Feb. 8, 2002. For information,
visit http://www.desert-crossing.com
-------------------------------------------------------------
Todays Gas Bulletins
* Andersen May Lose Its License to Audit Texas Companies
* Shares of PanCanadian Energy and Alberta Energy Surged on Rumors They
Are Headed for Multibillion Dollar Merger
* Enron Delinquent in Paying California Tax Bill
* Nabors Earnings Up Slightly Despite Natural Gas Drilling Slowdown
* Laclede Gas Names Kenneth Neises Executive Vice President and M
Pendergast
Promoted to VP - Associate General Counsel
* Devon Energy Completes Acquisition of Mitchell Energy
* Rochester Gas and Electric Testifies New York State Energy Plan Must
Support Reliability and Competitive Prices
* Many Ex-Enron Traders Having Trouble Finding New Jobs; UBS Warburg
Plans to Retain About 830 Natural Gas and Power Traders
------------------------------------------------------------
Ziff Energy Group presents
Gas Storage 2002
Redefining the Fundamentals:
Is Gas Still in the Storage Game?
Power Drives Storage
Will the recession affect plant and storage development?
Will record high volumes in storage further depress gas prices?
Is it possible to mitigate storage risk while dealing with year-round
price
volatility?
Plus
Two Important Workshops
Calpine Corporation
Hear what the Power Generator wants from the storage industry
Bruce Bernard
Learn from the expert how to mitigate storage price risk in the 2002 gas
marketplace
February 6 & 7
Houston
Four Season Hotel
1300 Lamar Street
Register Today for this Important Conference
Call 1-800-853-6252
Email: gasconference@ziffenergy.com
Visit: http://www.ziffenergyconferences.com
-------------------------------------------------------------
FERC to Hold Closed Meeting to Consider Investigation
The FERC plans to hold a rare, closed-door meeting next week to
discuss a several issues, including the possible initiation of an
investigation. The private meeting will be held Wednesday, immediately
following FERC's regularly scheduled bi-monthly meeting that is open to
the public. The FERC issued a list of agency officials who will attend the
closed-door discussion of the possible investigation, including Chairman
Wood and the three commissioners, the office of general counsel, staff
with FERC's office of market tariffs, and staff with the office of the
executive director. Other items to be discussed at the closed meeting
include: 1) A demand by a group of natural gas producers in the Gulf of
Mexico that Williams cut its new gathering rates and other fees for
transporting volumes to shore. The producers claim that Williams has
boosted its rate for interruptible gathering by more than 230% since
December 1st; 2) A July complaint by New Power Holdings that PJM
Interconnection's capacity requirements and deficiency charges are unjust,
discriminatory and preferential. New Power wants PJM to change its
existing capacity deficiency rate of $177 per MW day; 3) A case involving
a FERC order last summer that says National Fuel Gas violated the law when
it operated a natural gas well and storage fields in Erie County, New
York, before obtaining authorization.
-------------------------------------------------------------
R. W. Beck is an engineering and management consulting firm serving
utilities, developers, financiers and governments worldwide. Founded in
1942, we help our clients face energy market challenges by providing:
Portfolio Analysis to improve diversification and risk-adjusted
performance of energy assets.
Risk Control to help reduce the probability of losses.
Asset Valuation to understand the market value and risk characteristics of
physical and financial energy assets.
Training to improve your ability to identify and manage tactical and
strategic risks.
Please visit our web site at http://www.rwbeck.com
-------------------------------------------------------------
PSEG to Upgrade Coal Fired Plants in New Jersey
PSEG has agreed to spend $300 million over 10 years to install
equipment to limit air pollution at its New Jersey coal fired power plants
to bring them into compliance with 'new source' review rules that require
the installation of air pollution equipment when a plant undergoes major
modifications. The agreement settles a complaint brought by the Justice
Department, the EPA and the New Jersey Department of Environmental
Protection. The complaint alleged that PSEG failed to install necessary
pollution controls at two plants. The federal air pollution rule is
currently under review by the White House. Utilities with aging coal-fired
plants contend that the rule requires expensive upgrades which reduces
their ability to produce more energy. PSEG said it would rather resolve
the issue than face protracted and costly litigation. PSEG Power has about
17,000 MW of generation capacity. In 2004, the company will start to
phase-in equipment to reduce emissions of nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide
and mercury at 3 New Jersey coal-fired plants with a total capacity of
about 1,250 MW, with all work scheduled to be complete by 2012. PSEG will
install selective catalytic reduction and dry scrubber devices, which
remove particulates from exhaust before it is released into the air. The
new technologies will cost about $150 million each.
-------------------------------------------------------------
POWER FUTURES
| Month | COB | Change | PV | Change |
| FEB | 21.25 | +0.00 | 22.80 | -0.15 |
| MAR | 18.50 | +0.00 | 22.50 | +0.25 |
| APR | 20.00 | +0.00 | 24.00 | +0.50 |
| MAY | 18.25 | +0.00 | 24.75 | -0.25 |
| JUN | 20.00 | +0.00 | 29.15 | +0.65 |
| JUL | 29.50 | +0.00 | 38.75 | +0.75 |
| AUG | 40.00 | +0.00 | 44.00 | +0.75 |
| SEP | 34.00 | +0.00 | 33.30 | +0.30 |
| OCT | 28.00 | +0.00 | 28.00 | +1.00 |
| NOV | 27.50 | +0.00 | 27.00 | +1.00 |
| DEC | 28.50 | +0.00 | 27.50 | +1.00 |
| JAN | 28.50 | +0.00 | 28.25 | +0.50 |
| Month | Entergy | Change | Cinergy | Change |
| FEB | 18.80 | +0.35 | 20.00 | +0.50 |
| MAR | 18.75 | -0.50 | 21.00 | +0.25 |
| APR | 18.75 | -0.50 | 21.10 | +0.35 |
| MAY | 23.25 | +0.75 | 24.50 | +0.50 |
| JUN | 27.15 | +0.40 | 29.70 | +0.70 |
| JUL | 34.25 | +0.75 | 38.00 | +1.20 |
| AUG | 34.25 | +0.75 | 38.00 | +1.20 |
| SEP | 21.50 | +0.10 | 22.50 | +0.40 |
| OCT | 21.75 | +0.50 | 22.10 | +0.35 |
| NOV | 21.75 | +0.50 | 22.10 | +0.35 |
| DEC | 21.75 | +0.50 | 22.10 | +0.35 |
| JAN | 24.25 | +0.25 | 25.25 | +0.25 |
-------------------------------------------------------------
Power Futures
| Month | PJM | Change |
| FEB | 24.00 | +0.50 |
| MAR | 24.25 | +0.50 |
| APR | 24.25 | +0.50 |
| MAY | 27.20 | +0.60 |
| JUN | 33.50 | +0.65 |
| JUL | 45.00 | +1.25 |
| AUG | 45.00 | +1.25 |
| SEP | 25.25 | +0.10 |
| OCT | 25.10 | +0.35 |
| NOV | 25.10 | +0.35 |
| DEC | 25.10 | +0.35 |
| JAN | 28.25 | +0.25 |
-------------------------------------------------------------
KeySpan Net Income Falls 42%
KeySpan says 4th quarter net income fell 42% on lower natural gas
prices and expenses related to the sale of a barge business. Net income
declined to $34.4 million, or $0.25 per share, from $58.9 million, or
$0.43 a year earlier. Revenue fell 14% to $1.62 billion from $1.87
billion. KeySpan has agreed to sell its Midland Enterprises barge unit to
closely held Ingram Industries for $230 million in cash and $135 million
in assumed debt. It had expenses last quarter of $30.4 million, or $0.22
per share, related to the sale. KeySpan also wrote off the value of its
investment in natural gas reserves by $31.4 million, or $0.23, because of
lower natural gas prices. KeySpan owns 68% of Houston Exploration. It had
costs of $2.5 million on Roy Kay Cos, a general-contracting business it is
closing. Excluding those losses, KeySpan earned $99 million, or $0.71 per
share. It was expected to earn $0.75. KeySpan cut its 2002 earnings
forecast by $0.20 to $2.50 - $2.65, because it expects less profit from
exploration and production. KeySpan's Vice Chairman and Chief Operating
Officer Craig Matthews will retire, effective March 1st.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Energy Seminars, Inc. Announces Key Seminar Offerings for January:
Energy Seminars will be going to Florida and Calgary in 2002!
Click to http://www.energyseminars.com to see our 2002 schedule.
Register on-line at http://www.energyseminars.com or call Registrar Gina
Patrick
Phone: 281-362-7979
FAX: 281-296-9922
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cargill Halts Saltville Natural Gas Storage Expansion
An planned expansion of a Virginia natural gas storage facility
planned by Duke Energy and NUI has failed to obtain FERC approval because
Cargill filed a complaint. Cargill asked the FERC to issue an order
halting the construction of an expanded salt cavern storage facility
planned for Saltville, Virginia. Duke and NUI formed a joint venture
called Saltville LLC to expand the salt cavern storage to hold 12 Bcf of
working natural gas capacity over the next 3 years. The site currently
stores only 1.1 Bcf. Cargill says that the companies are attempting to
circumvent the jurisdiction of FERC by seeking approval only from Virginia
state regulators even though the gas may be used in interstate commerce.
The expanded Saltville storage site would have a deliverability of up to
550 MMcf per day. The Virginia State Corporation Commission has scheduled
a February 20th hearing on the project.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Progas Storage Services, Inc
Was recently organized to offer specialized natural gas storage services
to marketers and end users servicing the upper Midwest and Northeast
market regions along the major transmission systems in Indiana, Illinois,
Kentucky, and Michigan. PGSMI has 10 bcf of potential working capacity
which will offer service along TXG, ANR, Midwestern, and is currently
evaluating for purchase another 21 bcf of potential working capacity which
can be serviced by these and other systems in the region. PGSMI also
explores for natural gas in the Gulf Coast region through a wholly owned
subsidiary. Progas intends to go public through a route of private
industry offerings, and an IPO or registration. For more information on
services or the company mail to: gastorage@aol.com or for AOL mail to
gastorage@aol.com;
The company's executive and administrative office is located in Abilene,
Texas with storage operations in Owensboro, KY and exploration operations
in Corpus Christi, TX.
Progas Storage Services, Inc
8610 S. Hwy 277
Abilene, TX 79606
Ph 915 698 3699
Fx 915 698 2859
-------------------------------------------------------------
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
The TSE 300 rose 59.14 points to 7657.59
The CRB Index fell 0.29 points to 189.04
The US Dollar increased 0.12 points to 118.58
The Dow advanced 65.11 points to 9796.07
The S&P 500 added 3.97 points to 1132.15
The Nasdaq was up 20.20 points to 1942.58
March NYMEX Crude Oil gained 0.20 to 19.70
Canadian-US Exchange dipped 0.0019 to 1.6020
-------------------------------------------------------------
ENERGY MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE
Higher Education for refined product professionals
NOW ENROLLING RISK MANAGEMENT COURSES: PROFESSIONAL GASOLINE AND
DISTILLATE
MANAGEMENT, PETROLEUM MARKETER, and ADVANCED GASOLINE AND DISTILLATE
MASTER
LEVEL.
REGISTER NOW, CLASS SIZES ARE LIMITED.
SEE COMPLETE DETAILS CLICK HERE :http://www.energyinstitution.org
-------------------------------------------------------------
Pure Text, Lotus, AOL, Yahoo, Excite, Readers-subscribe by writing to:
enerfax-subscribe@egroups.com
Outlook Email Readers-subscribe to webmail by writing to:
mailto:join-EnerfaxDaily@relay.netatlantic.com
-------------------------------------------------------------
ENERGY MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE
Higher Education for refined product professionals
NOW ENROLLING RISK MANAGEMENT COURSES: PROFESSIONAL GASOLINE AND
DISTILLATE
MANAGEMENT, PETROLEUM MARKETER, and ADVANCED GASOLINE AND DISTILLATE
MASTER
LEVEL.
REGISTER NOW, CLASS SIZES ARE LIMITED.
SEE COMPLETE DETAILS CLICK HERE: http://www.energyinstitution.org
To view past issues of Enerfax Daily -Sign up for free at Divine's
Sagewave at
http://www.sagewave.com/D2/autolog/common/log.asp?KEY=enerfax
-------------------------------------------------------------
Please welcome our advertisers by visiting these websites.
http://www.e-acumen.com
http://www.kwi.com/
http://www.fea.com/
http://www.caminus.com/
http://www.progas.net/wip
http://www.ziffenergyconferences.com/
http://www.energyseminars.com
http://www.desert-crossing.com
http://www.epis.com
http://www.rwbeck.com
http://www.NewEnergyAssoc.com
enerfaxtext, forward to delete@enerfax.com to unsubscribe. |
fossum-d/all_documents/51. | 27914189.1075842423173.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Thu, 13 Jan 2000 00:53:00 -0800 (PST) | drew.fossum@enron.com | steven.harris@enron.com, mary.miller@enron.com, michel.nelson@enron.com, | Gallup Order: PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL, ATTORNEY CLIENT Now that the celebrating has died down, lets decide whether to seek rehearing
or clarification of the order. If there is anything in it that disadvantages
us, we should consider rehearing, particularly since it is a nearly certain
that our friends at SoCal will file a nasty one. (It might be good for Steve
H. or Bill or whoever has the best relationship with SoCal to make a high
level courtesy call to extend the olive branch and tell them that we'll work
with them to minimize their concerns blah blah blah. At minimum, we'll
probably learn if they do intend to seek rehearing)
I see two things that may be worth seeking rehearing on:
1. The requirement that we disclose our discount agreements in 15 days.
FERC really punted this issue. They say that "since the expansion capacity
is fully subscribed we see no reason why Transwestern should not publicly
disclose the agreements. . . . " This is the first time I've heard of any
rule that if your project is fully subscribed you therefore lose your right
to confidential treatment of sensitive pricing info. At minimum, we could
argue that the requirement is arbitrary and capricious because FERC didn't
even mention its normal regulations and procedures governing filing of
discount reports. It just cited the certificate regulation that requires an
applicant to "file" its rate information with the Commission (which we did)
and ignores the regulation (Sec. 284.7(c)(6)) that doesn't require a pipeline
to publicly disclose its discounts until 15 days after the close of the
billing period to which the discount pertained. The commercial people need
to decide if we care about this issue--i.e., how upset will the customers
with the high rates be when they learn about the low rates? Also, Frank
and Steve and Susan--since the order imposes a 15 day deadline on this issue,
do we need to file for a stay first and then rehearing?
2. The ECS issue.
I think we can work around this for the Gallup project, by filing a report
describing the operational control TW has under the O & M agreement. I've
talked to Mark Knippa of ECS and he is running the idea by Courtney and will
get back to me today. My real worry is what the "operational control"
requirement does to our future outsourcing/ monetization projects. I think
ECS and Hanover need to have operational control over the assets in our other
deals (i.e., TW compressor monetization) in order for both of us to get the
accounting treatment we need to monetize the forward revenue streams. If we
agree that TW will keep absolute operational control on this deal, FERC will
use it as precedent when we come in with the TW compression deal. Arthur
Anderson will crap on the monetization part of that deal (which is, after
all, the whole point of doing it) if TW retains too much control over the
asset. I'm not sure how to solve this yet, but lets all put some thought
into it.
3. Any others???
I'll turf to MKM the question of whether we need to set up a meeting on this
and when to chat. DF |
delainey-d/sent/455. | 196629.1075854473096.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Wed, 19 Jul 2000 14:25:00 -0700 (PDT) | david.delainey@enron.com | david.oxley@enron.com | Get your thumbscrews out I'm already perfect :)
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 07/19/2000
09:20 PM ---------------------------
David Oxley
07/19/2000 05:20 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kay Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Get your thumbscrews out
Dave,
Since you're on the list do you need we to get something scheduled with Kay?
David
---------------------- Forwarded by David Oxley/HOU/ECT on 07/19/2000 05:18
PM ---------------------------
Tim O'Rourke@ENRON
07/18/2000 05:05 PM
To: David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hoyt Thomas/NA/Enron@Enron, Kim
Melodick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amy FitzPatrick/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Cindy Skinner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fran L Mayes/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Get your thumbscrews out
Folks,
Attached is a list of 37 executives, not yet enrolled on the "exective impact
and influence" programme administered by Dick Amabile.
The OTC clearly set the goal at the beginning of the year, and repeated again
at Mid year, that all VPs and MDs need to have attended this programme by end
of year 2000. Their attendance does form part of the discussions on the VPs
and MDs at the executive PRC.
Despite repeated comms from the OTC, these 37 names have not yet enrolled (or
cancelled off a programme and have not re-enrolled).
HR has committed to making sure that these people are enrolled, so the
suggestion is that the named HR rep in the attachment takes 5 minutes to meet
with the individuals, explain that they need to do this, show them the list
of dates, and get them to choose which programme they want to enrol on.
Please do not leave that meeting without a date! A word of caution, it is
remotely possible that some of these individuals may have enrolled in the
very recent past, or have attended and this data not yet reached Dick's
spreadsheet, so do double check that they haven't yet enrolled before
twisting their arms..
The dates for the remaining programmes are also on the spreadsheet.
To enrol a VP or MD, get their dates, give it to their assistants and tell
them to directly contact Debbie Nowak on 33304.
Tim |
kean-s/calendar/untitled/2009. | 1395045.1075846325608.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Tue, 21 Nov 2000 10:27:00 -0800 (PST) | mary.bailey@enron.com | steven.kean@enron.com, mark.courtney@enron.com, traci.warner@enron.com, | Reminder - RICE MBA CORPORATE PARTNERS RECEPTION - 11/30 Thank you to everyone who has responded to the Rice MBA Career Reception. If
you have not, we need an RSVP by Monday, November 27th.
It has been brought to my attention that the Rice invitation said that you
could bring a guest. Unfortunately this is not possible for attendees from
Enron. This will be a working event for us, and we cannot accommodate you and
a guest.
It is very important every Rice Team member attend the following event in
support of Enron, Rice University and Houston.
Rice University is please to invite you Thursday, November 30, 2000
and to join us for a special event 6:00 pm - 9:00 pm
featuring Jeffrey K. Skilling, Business Attire
President & COO, Enron Corporation, Enron Bldg. 50th Floor
speaking on MBA Career Opportunities in Texas.
Rice MBA Corporate Partners Reception
Please see the attached invitation - Enron CPR.doc
RSVP to Alison Bailey by return e-mail or ext. 3-6778. |
baughman-d/power/fundamentals/8. | 3764055.1075855141713.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Tue, 31 Jul 2001 06:06:49 -0700 (PDT) | lloyd.will@enron.com | juan.hernandez@enron.com, don.baughman@enron.com, corry.bentley@enron.com | FW: Traffic Report outage and new product enhancements Note the new ATC features below.
-----Original Message-----
From: "Stuart Wright" <stuart@friedwire.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Stuart+20Wright+22+20+3Cstuart+40friedwire+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 2:58 PM
To: productalert@friedwire.com
Subject: Traffic Report outage and new product enhancements
To Our Valued Traffic Report Clients,
Today, FriedWire's Traffic Report experienced a disruption in service as a result of network and general connectivity problems caused by third parties. We apologize for this inconvenience and are working with all of our partners to insure that this does not happen again. As always, we remain committed to providing you power markets information around-the-clock.
Product Update
FriedWire has just added significant new content and capability to the Traffic Report, which areoutlined below. Please contact us for brief, online tutorials on how to use the new features.
NOAA Climate Prediction Center (CPC) Weather Forecasts
3-7 day Maximum Temperatures
6-10 day Outlook and Temperature Probability
8-14 day Prognostic Temperature Anomaly
Excessive Heat Outlooks (for the same time periods listed above)
Precipitation Outlooks and Anomalies
***You may also be able to set up e-mail notification services to alert you when the new forecasts become available so that you don't have to continually check to see if the new data have been posted.
Available Transmission Capacity
FriedWire has developed a new interface that will allow you to search for available transmission by path. The new geographic interface will allow you to choose a path and then view the detailed ATC offerings and then navigate to easily see reverse-path information, thru-path offerings, offerings from non-path providers and more.
***E-mail and wireless text-paging notification services are now available along with the new ATC interface. Now, you can be automatically notified when new ATCs are posted by providers or on paths that you track ongoingly. You can custom define your alerts according to the provider, path, service increment, time period, class, etc.that you're interested in, as well as define when you want to be contacted (days of the week, time of day, times per day, etc.).
The following additional product upgrades have been deployed:
All hourly offerings are now reflected in military time designations.
Hourly ATC selection reflected now as a range (i.e.; 13:00 - 14:00) instead of hour-beginning 1:00 PM.
Eight new flowgates have been added for Sierra-Pacific Power and 74 for MidAmerican Energy. They all have Intertie Profiles and can be located by selecting "View All Interties". All will be located and plotted on the power flow maps in the next couple of weeks.
You can now add one (or multiple) e-mail and text-page addresses easily in order to get Alerts from the Traffic Report. Simply click on the link that says "My Account" at the top right-hand corner of any Traffic Report screen and look for the link just to the right of the E-mail * input field that says Enter additional e-mails. Go to the Add an E-mail Contact link at the bottom of the next screen.
We hope you enjoy and find useful the new version of the Traffic Report. Please stay tuned for more exciting additions in the near future.
Sincerely,
Bill Townsend
President
FriedWire Inc. |
arnold-j/inbox/78. | 4542866.1075855217312.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Wed, 19 Dec 2001 08:42:27 -0800 (PST) | michael.gapinski@ubspw.com | john.arnold@enron.com | Private Equity Fund John -
I want to confirm that you received the literature on the UBS PaineWebber
Private Equity Fund III and the Tamarack Fund. The Private Equity III
literature refers to a December 17 closing date; however, we have extended
that closing, so you may still be able to participate. Have you reviewed
the material, yet?
Thanks,
> Michael Gapinski
> Account Vice President
> UBS PaineWebber, Inc.
> Corporate Employee Financial Services
> 713-654-0365
> 800-553-3119 x365
> Fax: 713-427-7539
> Cell: 281-435-0295
michael.gapinski@ubspw.com
<<Michael Gapinski (E-mail).vcf>>
******************************************************
Notice Regarding Entry of Orders and Instructions:
Please do not transmit orders and/or instructions
regarding your UBSPaineWebber account(s) by e-mail.
Orders and/or instructions transmitted by e-mail will
not be accepted by UBSPaineWebber and UBSPaineWebber
will not be responsible for carrying out such orders
and/or instructions.
Notice Regarding Privacy and Confidentiality:
UBSPaineWebber reserves the right to monitor and
review the content of all e-mail communications sent
and/or received by its employees.
- Michael Gapinski (E-mail).vcf |
kaminski-v/sent/2165. | 17764196.1075856488181.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Thu, 17 Aug 2000 03:06:00 -0700 (PDT) | vince.kaminski@enron.com | vkaminski@aol.com | Re: Cairn Gas Purchase Bid ---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 08/17/2000
10:11 AM ---------------------------
From: Doug Leach 08/15/2000 07:54 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Cairn Gas Purchase Bid
Vince--shades of Cuiba
---------------------- Forwarded by Doug Leach/HOU/ECT on 08/15/2000 07:53 AM
---------------------------
From: Doug Leach on 08/15/2000 07:52 AM
To: Douglas S Parsons/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Marc De La Roche/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bobby
Farris/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Re: Cairn Gas Purchase Bid
You spoke to me once and I gave you my opinions which were contrary to your
resultant offer to Cairn. Currently, I have better things to do with my time.
Douglas S Parsons@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
08/15/2000 12:10 AM
To: Doug Leach/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Marc De La Roche/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bobby
Farris/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Re: Cairn Gas Purchase Bid
I talked to Vince after we hung up and his only suggestion was to call
Sandeep Kohli. I spoke with Marc and yourself four times on this matter over
a 3 day period and given the timing, I put forth a non-binding offer, after
discussing it further with Bobby, based on the information I had that appears
to position us close to our competitors offers. We haven't committed
ourselves and should we be selected for negotiations there are numerous
variables to affect the outcome. If you've got any suggestions for a better
deal, please advise.
Doug Leach@ECT
08/14/2000 07:45 AM
To: Douglas S Parsons/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Marc De La Roche/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bobby
Farris/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Re: Cairn Gas Purchase Bid
I strongly disagree with the pricing and structure of your non-binding offer
to Cairn. This reminds me of the debacle in Brazil. You should have contacted
Vince Kaminski's research group as we talked about before an offer was made.
This is a bad deal.
Douglas S Parsons@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
08/12/2000 01:51 AM
To: Doug Leach@ECT, Marc De La Roche@ECT
cc:
Subject: Cairn Gas Purchase Bid
Doug & Marc,
FYI, please let me know if you think we're totally off base. I appreciate
your help.
Regards,
Doug
---------------------- Forwarded by Douglas S Parsons/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
08/12/2000 01:48 AM ---------------------------
Douglas S Parsons
08/11/2000 06:24 AM
To: Bobby Farris/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: F B Virani/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ujjwal
Dey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Nilesh
Vaishnav/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Cairn Gas Purchase Bid
Bobby,
After meeting with Cairn today in Delhi, my perception is that our offer was
received well. They were more open and relaxed then they were on Wed.
morning and made several encouraging comments about our price range, (once we
talked through the price movements), and the seriousness of our gas related
activities on the West Coast of India, in light of the IOC agreement. I
think the overall package is attractive to them and no serious objections
were raised. We did talk to some extent about the guarantees, but we didn't
get too far and they're willing to accept at this point that what's
acceptable to the LNG suppliers, should be suitable for their needs.
However, they would like to understand the corporate structure and assets of
Enron Energy Marketing a little better and I told them I would get back to
them on that point.
David and Ajay were up in Hazira yesterday looking at some property for their
gas treatment facility, which apparently is across the road from pipeline
access. While there they went and looked at Shell's proposed LNG site after
walking the last 1 km, inaccessible to their 4wd vehicle and not surprisingly
found a beach.
In summary, here is what we offered on a non-binding basis:
Six year production plateau
85% TOP
$3.67/MMBtu Net, at a base of $18/bbl Brent, with point of sale at the
tail-end of the gas processing plant
Floor & Cap of $15.50 - $27.00/bbl
Price movement: +/- $1.00/ bbl from the $18/bbl base price (on a 3 mo.
rolling average) equals +/- $0.145/MMBtu fixed on a quarterly basis
Guarantees: Same protection we're providing the LNG suppliers under the
Trust Retention Account
I appreciate everyone's help in submitting this offer.
Thanks,
Doug |
germany-c/all_documents/1754. | 24438895.1075853702487.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Mon, 27 Mar 2000 00:32:00 -0800 (PST) | chris.germany@enron.com | brenda.fletcher@enron.com | CNG Park & Loan ---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 03/27/2000 08:28
AM ---------------------------
Chris Germany
03/27/2000 08:27 AM
To: Angie Zeman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Molly LaFuze/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor
Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Oliver/HOU/ECT@ECT, Crystal Hyde/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Dana Daigle/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Hendrickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gloria G
Barkowsky/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sherry Anastas/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: CNG Park & Loan
We parked 25,000 dt/day on the 25th-27th (deal 225515) on CNG and we will be
taking it out during April (deal 225534). ENA will pay CNG $.02 x 75,000 dt
= $1,500.00 in April.
Please let me know if you have questions. |
kaminski-v/_sent_mail/2246. | 1726452.1075856556379.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Fri, 4 Aug 2000 09:47:00 -0700 (PDT) | vince.kaminski@enron.com | vkaminski@aol.com | Enterprise risk management ---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 08/04/2000
04:52 PM ---------------------------
"Paul Bristow" <pbristow@risk.co.uk> on 08/03/2000 05:14:43 AM
Please respond to "Paul Bristow" <pbristow@risk.co.uk>
To: <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Enterprise risk management
Dear Vince,
?
Thanks for your call the other day regarding EPRM's upcoming enterprise risk
management conference. We seem to be making progress and are pulling
together some interesting subjects for inclusion this year. I am currently
at a stage where there are plenty of possible sessions and over the next
week I will be able to decide of which will stay and which will go.
?
I have attached a file that gives an indication of the topics that have been
identified so far. Although I have bullet points for the sessions I would
first like to identify interested parties and then work with them to develop
a session that reflects their particular expertise and experience. I also
think that by continuously developing the points we can make greater
allowances for continuity between each participant.
?
Based on our discussion I would be extremely interested in inviting you to
lead a session on the main conference. You seemed to have an interesting
view on operational risk and the particular challenges that are presented
within the energy industry. This session will run on Thursday, November
16th. The title is reasonably broad at this stage and any suggestions are
welcome.
?
Your overall views on the current conference content is also welcome and if
you feel that another session is more suited to your work do not hesitate to
contact me. I look forward to speaking with you soon.
?
Yours sincerely,
?
Paul Bristow
Senior Course and Conference Producer, Energy & Power Risk Management
+44 (0) 20 7484 9883
- maildoc.doc |
kaminski-v/all_documents/184. | 13917836.1075856183544.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Tue, 1 May 2001 09:52:00 -0700 (PDT) | vince.kaminski@enron.com | hamel@ruf.rice.edu | Term paper Stuart,
I cannot open your attachment.
Vince Kaminski |
kaminski-v/inbox/330. | 662102.1075858462760.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Thu, 31 May 2001 15:13:20 -0700 (PDT) | lu@enron.com | paulo.issler@enron.com | FW: Strip of Spread Options Paulo,
Our Calgary office needs an option model that prices a strip of daily spread options.
In Exotica, we have the Ostrip model that does a strip of daily European options.
To modify that into spread option, we need to replace the EURO() function into
Spdopt() function.
Lon would like to speak to you directly tomorrow about his specification.
I think one week or so is probably a reasonable time line for the delivery. Thanks.
Zimin
-----Original Message-----
From: Draper, Lon
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 4:49 PM
To: Lu, Zimin
Cc: Disturnal, John
Subject: Strip of Spread Options
Zimin,
As we were discussing, it would be extremely helpful to our desk if the research group could create a new exotica function that would calculate a strip of daily spread options similar to how the ostrip function calculates a strip of daily options. We have just put on a sizable daily spread option position and expect to add to it in the following months. A new spread option function would be invaluable for marking to market our existing positions as well as help us to price new deals quickly. We currently value each option in the strip individually.
Thanks,
Lon |
farmer-d/all_documents/1010. | 1474432.1075853989779.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Thu, 17 Aug 2000 06:03:00 -0700 (PDT) | daren.farmer@enron.com | mary.poorman@enron.com | Re: Deal Ticket 329242; Meter 986887 I rolled ceal 329242 for Aug 1.
D
Mary Poorman@ENRON
08/16/2000 04:28 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Deal Ticket 329242; Meter 986887
There is a drab of gas; 34 MM's on the first of August on the meter.
Probably from valving off. The above ref'd deal was from Jul, do you want to
extend it for one day? Let me know.
Mary
35251 |
kean-s/archiving/untitled/2311. | 9689418.1075846269982.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Fri, 11 Apr 1997 09:00:00 -0700 (PDT) | steven.kean@enron.com | VDEW German Delegation visiting, per Fiona Grant. She is lining Maybe Kathleen for Gas and Steve or Rick for Electricity.
Fiona Grant is primary contact, Kim Chandler is backup contact. |
|
cuilla-m/deleted_items/21. | 18754779.1075853084827.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Thu, 18 Oct 2001 10:11:11 -0700 (PDT) | martin.cuilla@enron.com | martin.cuilla@enron.com | Commissioner.COM Transaction Request This is an automated e-mail sent out from the Commissioner.COM
web site. Do not reply to this e-mail, but instead please visit
your league's site. Go to http://fantasy.sportsline.com and sign in!
-------------------------------------------------------------
Martin Cuilla requests the following transaction:.
Add Packers.
-------------------------------------------------------------
To approve this transaction, please go to your web site and
select Transactions, Requests in the Front Office. |
delainey-d/discussion_threads/301. | 11313489.1075854452945.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Fri, 18 Aug 2000 03:26:00 -0700 (PDT) | david.delainey@enron.com | david.oxley@enron.com | changing rating David, I would change John Thompson and Ed Baughman to strong.
Thxs
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 08/18/2000
10:25 AM ---------------------------
David Oxley
08/18/2000 08:19 AM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: changing rating
Presumably you still want Thompson moved to Strong?
---------------------- Forwarded by David Oxley/HOU/ECT on 08/18/2000 08:19
AM ---------------------------
Gina Corteselli@ENRON
08/18/2000 08:17 AM
To: David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: changing rating
Got your voice mail. Changing John Thompson's rating is a simple matter at
this point-then we'll redo the graphs and clusters. We will make the
change from Satisfactory to Strong. Do you anticipate any others?
Gina |
farmer-d/all_documents/3107. | 12301905.1075854190235.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Wed, 4 Apr 2001 04:24:00 -0700 (PDT) | mjones7@txu.com | kponton@duke-energy.com, cstone1@txu.com, ggreen2@txu.com, | Re: noms/actual flow for 4/01/01 We agree with 35.000 for April 1, 2001
"Eileen Ponton" <kponton@duke-energy.com> on 04/04/2001 09:37:36 AM
To: David Avila/LSP/ENSERCH/US@TU, Charlie Stone/Texas Utilities@TU, Melissa
Jones/Texas Utilities@TU, HPL.SCHEDULING@ENRON.COM,
LIZ.BELLAMY@ENRON.COM
cc:
Subject: noms/actual flow for 4/01/01
I will agree with the nom of 35,000 for the 1st. We are experiencing
difficulties in downloading actual flow volumes from El Paso thus my gas
control has advised to use a flow rate of 35,000 for the 1st at this point
in time. When we receive a more accurate measurement volume I will forward
to you....... |
beck-s/discussion_threads/3711. | 30722139.1075856032323.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Tue, 23 Jan 2001 03:41:00 -0800 (PST) | sally.beck@enron.com | steve.venturatos@enron.com | Re: Congratulations, etc................... Thanks for the congratulations. David of course is pleased about the
promotion but is most anxious to see what dollars come along with it!
Thanks, too, for your comments on the OpRisk session. It is always a risk to
pull together an audience of 90 and deliver something worthwhile. --Sally
Enron North America Corp.
From: Steve Venturatos 01/23/2001 08:24 AM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Congratulations, etc...................
First of all congratulations on your promotion, it is well deserved. You are
really in some rarefied air, since there seem to be very few Managing
Directors.
I also would like to compliment you on putting together one of the best 2
1/2 hour seminars / workshops that I have ever attended ( I know that is
saying a mouthful). The Operational Risk Meeting / Workshop was not only
informative, but the constantly changing formats kept everyone's attention.
I believe the meeting also caused a renewed enthusiasm among your supervisory
personnel. This is not only my observation, but the feeling of all of the
people that I have talked to over the past few weeks.
Once again, congrats.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
baughman-d/power/legal_agreements/105. | 24284821.1075862605386.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Mon, 19 Nov 2001 12:25:26 -0800 (PST) | l..denton@enron.com | andrea.dahlke@enron.com, casey.evans@enron.com, paul.lewis@enron.com, | California Department of Water Resources We received the executed EEI Master Power Purchase and Sale Agreement dated 4/20/2001 from the referenced CP. The document will be scanned into Livelink. |
baughman-d/all_documents/180. | 8862001.1075848315057.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Tue, 20 Feb 2001 16:15:00 -0800 (PST) | christopher.watts@enron.com | richard.hrabal@enron.com, cyril.price@enron.com, john.kinser@enron.com, | Re: Updated IPD DIRECT template THIS TEMPLATE IS STORED IN THE M:ELECTRIC\24 HOUR\CIN INDEX\IPG EMAIL
REPORTS\2001\FEB 01\ REVISED TEMPLATE 2-20-01.
"Ellen Clardy" <ellen.clardy@ipgdirect.com> on 02/20/2001 12:06:56 PM
Please respond to <ellen.clardy@ipgdirect.com>
To: <Dean.Laurent@enron.com>, <Mitch.Robinson@enron.com>,
<Doug.Miller@enron.com>, <Miguel.Garcia@enron.com>, <Larry.Jester@enron.com>,
"Christopher Watts" <Christopher.Watts@enron.com>, "Don Baughman"
<don.baughman@enron.com>, "John Kinser" <John.Kinser@enron.com>, "Kayne
Coulter" <Kayne.Coulter@enron.com>
cc: "Suzanna Strangmeier" <Suzanna.Strangmeier@ipgdirect.com>, "Bobette
Riner" <bobette.riner@ipgdirect.com>
Subject: Updated template
We have begun beta testing our 3 new indexes: TVA, ComEd, and ERCOT. If you
could please share the attached template with everyone on the hourly desk at
night, we would really appreciate it! It is very similar to the one before,
but it includes the new indexes. As always, any indicative prices are very
welcomed!
If you have any questions, feel free to contact us. Thank you so much for
your time.
Ellen Clardy, Ph.D.
Power Market Analyst
TradersNews
713/647-6603
ellen.clardy@ipgdirect.com
- 6ndxtemplate.xls |
benson-r/deleted_items/142. | 278592.1075862265258.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Thu, 8 Nov 2001 14:49:12 -0800 (PST) | notifications.isc@enron.com | users.dl-enron@enron.com | Updated - Cancellation of System Outage Notification UPDATE
Cancellation of System Outage Notification
Outage Description:
We had previously communicated that all SAP systems (including Financial Production, HR Production, Interfaces , iBuyIt, and iPayIt) would be shutdown over the weekend in order to upgrade our storage hardware. We are temporarily postponing these activities and will send you additional communications to inform you of the new date(s) in the near future.
Date & Time of Outage:
The scheduled System Outage has been postponed
Contacts:
Contact:
Contact Information:
ISC Customer Care
713-345-4727 |
beck-s/all_documents/2053. | 32802845.1075855794651.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Thu, 8 Jun 2000 10:51:00 -0700 (PDT) | michael.moscoso@enron.com | sally.beck@enron.com | Spreadsheets and other Data FYI.
---------------------- Forwarded by Michael E Moscoso/HOU/ECT on 06/08/2000
05:50 PM ---------------------------
Enron North America Corp.
From: Jeffrey C Gossett 06/07/2000 05:26 PM
To: Michael E Moscoso/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan
Harrison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sunil Dalal/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Vladimir
Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Spreadsheets and other Data
Spreadsheets :
(in Quark)
EES_Dublin
NG_Opt
Pipe_Opt_date
Storage_opt_date
All Transport models:
East
West
Central
Manual Adjustments:
Spreadsheets
Fixed Price Canadian Deals
Roll Off
Let me know if you need anything further.
Thanks
JG |
jones-t/inbox/481. | 105801.1075858960725.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Mon, 22 Oct 2001 06:14:14 -0700 (PDT) | mark.greenberg@enron.com | kim.detiveaux@enron.com | RE: NDA with Experian Kim -
Please provide me with the full name and address for Experian. Also, we can forward the agreement on your behalf if you provide us with an e-mail address and contact name. Finally, please give me some indication of the exact nature of the discussions, if there is any need to make the NDA specific vs. general.
If you provide these items today, we should be able to get our language out later this afternoon, tomorrow moring at the latest.
Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: Detiveaux, Kim
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 8:10 AM
To: Greenberg, Mark
Cc: Chaney, Craig; Perinne, Albane
Subject: NDA with Experian
Importance: High
Mark:
I have started discussions with Experian, likely to result in Experian becoming Enron's #2 provider of credit scoring data. I need to get an NDA in place with Experian ASAP to cover sensitive items likely to be covered during our negotiations. I would like to get our NDA language to them today. Please advise as to how to proceed...
Kim Detiveaux |
bass-e/sent/1355. | 9280618.1075854779185.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Mon, 18 Dec 2000 08:00:00 -0800 (PST) | eric.bass@enron.com | shanna.husser@enron.com, dfranklin@hanovermeasurement.com, | My Complaint letter to America West I thought you all might find this an interesting read. Sorry, the complaint
form wasn't very user friendly - I guess the person that designed the
form is the same that hired there ticketing help.
-E
To whom it may concern:
I recently returned from a wonderful vacation to Telluride. It was wonderful
except for the fact that I traveled on your airline.
I was originally supposed to leave out of IAH at 6:05 AM on 12/9/00 for
Phoenix and catch a 10:00 AM connection to Telluride
(the only flight of the day from Phoenix to Telluride). Unfortunately, the
flight was cancelled due to the re-routing of our plane because
of foggy conditions in the Houston area. I do not blame America West for
this; It is understandable to cancel this flight because of
the danger involved in landing in foggy conditions. There is, however, no
danger involved in taking off in these conditions, which
leads me to the point of this complaint. Your ticketing staff in IAH was
less than helpful in re-routing us on another airline
(Continental/United/American had several flights that could have delivered us
to Phoenix in time to catch our connection) so that
we could make our connection. Instead, we were told that it was impossible
to find a flight that could get us to Phoenix in time for this
connection. Subsequently, I called other airlines and confirmed space on
flights that would have delivered us to Phoenix on time.
It now appears that America West was more willing to sacrifice a day of my
vacation rather than pay up to put me on another flight.
I am extremely disillusioned with the service we received; Because we missed
our connection we were forced to spend a combined
6 hrs in the Phoenix and Houston airports and eventually fly into Montrose,
CO where we had to drive 100 miles to Telluride. Instead
of arriving in Telluride, Co at 12pm on 12/9 we arrived at 10pm, a full ten
hours later. This delay caused the waste of one full day of
vacation. Myself and members of my group will never fly your airline again
because of this experience.
For your research I provide the following data:
Persons in Party - Eric Bass, Larry Bass, Kathy Bass, Jason Bass, Shanna
Husser, and Donnita Franklin.
Final Itinerary (after all changes) -
Flt. 2765 Dec. 09 Iah-Phx 8:51AM
Flt. 6244 Dec. 09 Phx-Mtj 3:34PM
Flt. 6241 Dec. 14 Mtj-Phx 9:00AM
Flt. 2273 Dec. 14 Phx-Iah 1:15PM
Sincerely,
Eric Bass |
kean-s/sent_items/84. | 31654207.1075858880229.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Mon, 1 Oct 2001 06:19:30 -0700 (PDT) | j..kean@enron.com | maureen.mcvicker@enron.com | FW: <<Concur Expense Document>> - SK092001 -----Original Message-----
From: enron_update@concureworkplace.com
[mailto:enron_update@concureworkplace.com]
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 4:08 AM
To: Steven Kean
Subject: <<Concur Expense Document>> - SK092001
The Payment status has changed on the following report:
Status last changed by: System
Expense Report Name: SK092001
Report Total: $12,006.59
Amount Due Employee: $12,006.59
Amount Approved: $12,006.59
Amount Paid: $12,006.59
Approval Status: Approved
Payment Status: Paid
To review this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://expensexms.enron.com |
campbell-l/notes_inbox/304. | 8861994.1075857881124.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Tue, 21 Nov 2000 05:24:00 -0800 (PST) | richard.hrabal@enron.com | joe.errigo@enron.com, jay.wills@enron.com, don.baughman@enron.com, | To all you ass men out there] OPEN IN PRIVATE
- Slide1.jpg
- Slide10.jpg
- Slide11.jpg
- Slide12.jpg |
dasovich-j/all_documents/4377. | 23955244.1075843064498.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Thu, 7 Dec 2000 02:23:00 -0800 (PST) | rcarroll@bracepatt.com | acomnes@enron.com, jdasovic@enron.com, jhartso@enron.com, jsteffe@enron.com, | FERC Attorney Says California May Not Ban Power Exports FYI - according to this article, a FERC commissioner informed Dow Jones that
FERC does not plan to expand the price cap to the entire Western region.
DJ FERC: Davis Can't Force Generators To Sell Pwr In Calif
Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
LOS ANGELES (Dow Jones)--A move by California Gov. Gray Davis which seeks to
bar in-state generators from exporting their abundant power supply is a
violation of interstate commerce rules - and therefore will never be
implemented, an attorney with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission told
Dow Jones Newswires.
Last month, energy officials proposed to Davis the possibility of forcing
in-state generators to sell all of their power into California, especially
during statewide power emergencies.
Davis said Tuesday night he may still seek legislation to force generators to
sell their power supply here, which would help the state's grid operator
avoid rolling blackouts.
But according to federal law, the state cannot prohibit companies from doing
business with other states, the attorney said, adding that it violates
interstate commerce rules.
Part of the reason energy companies export some of their power is that other
states are willing to pay far above California's wholesale electricity price
cap of $250 a megawatt-hour.
Tuesday, with the state teetering on the brink of rolling blackouts, Northern
California irrigation districts - government operated utilities that supply
water and power to farmers - sold about 400 MW of excess power to the
Northwest, reaping huge profits because customers there are not bound by a
price cap.
The ISO - forced to compete with companies willing to pay $1,000/MWh for
electricity - narrowly avoided rolling blackouts Tuesday by paying about $1.1
million for 1,000 MW of power, which is $1,100 a megawatt-hour.
Still, Gov. Davis is pushing FERC to impose a $100/MWh regional price cap.
But a FERC commissioner told Dow Jones Newswires that the commission will
very likely impose a $100/MWh price in California only. FERC's final order on
remedies California must undertake to repair its flawed market is due next
week.
But the FERC commissioner said it's the state's current price cap of $250/MWh
that's destroying the wholesale market and resulting in generators exporting
their power for a profit.
"If they can make $275/MWh in Nevada they have an obligation to their
shareholders," the FERC commissioner said.
State lawmakers, meanwhile, want to force generators who conduct business in
the state to report all wholesale electricity transactions to a state energy
panel and register before selling power.
-By Jason Leopold; Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3874;
mailto:jason.leopold@dowjones.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires 06-12-00
2308GMT |
jones-t/all_documents/2778. | 12546231.1075846978676.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Mon, 24 Jul 2000 03:49:00 -0700 (PDT) | veronica.espinoza@enron.com | debbie.brackett@enron.com, william.bradford@enron.com, | Credit Watch List--7/24/00 Attached is a newly revised Credit Watch listing. If there are any
personnel in your group that were not included in this distribution, please
insure that they receive a copy of this report.
To add additional people to this distribution, or if this report has been
sent to you in error, please contact Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.
For other questions, please contact Bill Bradford at x3-3831, Russell Diamond
at 5-7095, Brant Reves at x3-9897, Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002 or the Global
Credit Hotline at x3-1803. |
dasovich-j/sent/4786. | 17360466.1075843896936.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Thu, 31 May 2001 10:29:00 -0700 (PDT) | jeff.dasovich@enron.com | richard.shapiro@enron.com | Asm Dem Plan Here's the document that I received from the lobbyist today. It's the same
document that I distributed internally yesterday.
Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 05/31/2001 05:26 PM -----
"Delaney Hunter" <dhunter@s-k-w.com>
05/30/2001 12:29 PM
Please respond to dhunter
To: "Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)" <jdasovic@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Asm Dem Plan
A little something we got our hands on.....
- Assembly Demo Plan.doc |
horton-s/discussion_threads/225. | 9615128.1075844950706.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Wed, 24 May 2000 15:43:00 -0700 (PDT) | waters-davis@reliantenergy.com | stanley.horton@enron.com | Re: EEI Support of Forming an EISB with GISB As you can see by the attached memo, we have slightly diffferent
interpretations of what the committee members agreed to. However, the
direction is still positive.
---------------------- Forwarded by Waters Davis/ADM/HouInd on 05/24/2000
10:40 PM ---------------------------
"Michael McGrath" <MMcGrath@eei.org> on 05/24/2000 04:29:16 PM
To: <waters-davis@reliantenergy.com>
cc:
Subject: Re: EEI Support of Forming an EISB with GISB
Waters,
I see the problem - my address is mmcgrath@eei.org - not kmcgrath. Sorry
about that - it was misprinted in a ubp list some time back, and has
haunted me ever since.
Also - be advised we do not yet support the EISB option - we only agree to
find acceptable organizational solutions - which could be an EISB. If we
jump to EISB at the outset folks will resist. Let's not introduce that
concept until there is support for it. I can assure you there will be
resistance to creating another wholesale rule writing group - homework must
be done.
Thanks for your help
-Mike
>>> <waters-davis@reliantenergy.com> 05/24/00 05:02PM >>>
Resend - -
---------------------- Forwarded by Waters Davis/ADM/HouInd on 05/24/2000
04:02 PM ---------------------------
Waters Davis
05/24/2000 04:00 PM
To: stanley.horton@enron.com
cc: kmcgrath@eei.org
Subject: EEI Support of Forming an EISB with GISB
The next EEI CEO meeting will be held June 18-21. I believe the CEO EISB
Task Force will recommend to proceed with the next step of working with
GISB to prepare a formal EISB proposed organization plan which would be
voted on by EEI at a future meeting. We will let you know the outcome of
the June 18-21 meeting.
Waters |
baughman-d/discussion_threads/320. | 17122766.1075848329893.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Fri, 20 Apr 2001 01:48:00 -0700 (PDT) | stewart@mallia.com | reidstav@houston.rr.com, stavinm@basf-corp.com, vstewart@inotes.iced.net, | FW: Bastrop Bayou Check this out. On Thursday I emailed Ed Campbell, the guy that writes
the "Campbell's Guide to Cruising Texas." I wanted to know what he
thought about me trying to take my sailboat up Bastrop Bayou.
Surprisingly, he replied almost immediately with a long, fairly helpful
email.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ed Campbell [mailto:eden@pyramid3.net]
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 6:06 AM
To: Marc Stewart
Subject: Re: Bastrop Bayou
Marc:
My explorations of Bastrop Bayou have been done on "skinny water" craft.
However, I have been there during very low winter water, where the deep
channel was very clear. It does wind through shallower areas,
particularly
just north of the ICW. If you take it really slow and read the channel
with
a depth sounder or (more dependably) with a cane pole about 10-12 feet
long,
finding the deep water shouldn't be a problem. However, for parts of the
trip, I suspect carrying a six foot draft could be interesting (not your
problem, fortunately). I hope the FM road bridge is upstream from your
friend's house; it looks like a 45 footer (marginal for your 32, I'll
bet).
Maybe your friend has a boat, or a neighbor with a boat, and you can
arrange
to go for a "look see" ride armed with your cane pole. Just from casual
observation, I've often seen shallow spots crop up near waterfront
housing
from yard runoff, etc. that might cause more problems for you than the
bayou
itself.
I'd guess that the biggest problems for you will be at the ICW
intersection
(it's sometimes difficult to find the deep entrance there: just keep
poking
your nose in, slowly...it's there...) and at the upstream end of your
trip.
Of course, it's always fun to "divine" the navigational meaning attached
to
a particular piece of PVC stuck in the mud here and there.
Short of a prior "look see", you might consider what I often do. The
dinghy
is in the water. towed on a short painter and available for instant use.
If
I see a shoaling trend or lose my "feel" of where deep water lies ahead,
I'll anchor (short scope) where I am (although not in the ICW!) and
explore
in the dink using a sounding pole or lead line. Cindy and I worked our
way
across the flats on the Bahama Bank side of the Berry Islands using that
technique several years ago. Out there, they say you can tell depth by
the
water color - well, yes, but on the banks water that is 4 feet looks the
same shade of white as 2 feet...or 6 inches for that matter...problem is
that you can see where you left bottom paint... Ya' jus' gotta go slo'
Sounds like a fun trip. I'd like to hear more.
Regards,
Ed Campbell
-----Original Message-----
From: Marc Stewart <Stewart@Mallia.com>
To: 'campbell@waltereden.com' <campbell@waltereden.com>
Date: Thursday, April 19, 2001 17:28
Subject: Bastrop Bayou
>I have a 32' Endeavour sailboat with a 4'2" draft that I would like to
>try to take up Bastrop Bayou from the ICW. I have a friend with a
>bayhouse near the bridge at Demi-John Island. Your cruising guide
>seems to suggest I could make the trip, but I was wondering if you have
>ever personally taken your sailboat up the bayou and, if so, how
>difficult was it?
> |
guzman-m/notes_inbox/783. | 29989316.1075840709636.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Thu, 8 Mar 2001 11:39:00 -0800 (PST) | pete.davis@enron.com | pete.davis@enron.com | Start Date: 3/8/01; HourAhead hour: 20; <CODESITE> Start Date: 3/8/01; HourAhead hour: 20; No ancillary schedules awarded. No
variances detected.
LOG MESSAGES:
PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001030820.txt
---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
Details:
TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
SC_ID: ECTRT
MKT_TYPE: 2
TRANS_DATE: 3/8/01
TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_WATER
ENGY_TYPE: FIRM
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
Details:
TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
SC_ID: ECTRT
MKT_TYPE: 2
TRANS_DATE: 3/8/01
TIE_POINT: FCORNR_5_PSUEDO
INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_BLAZERS
ENGY_TYPE: NFRM |
beck-s/deleted_items/152. | 7084753.1075845069287.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Fri, 1 Jun 2001 14:26:57 -0700 (PDT) | lisa.costello@enron.com | sally.beck@enron.com | 2001 Customer Meeting Sally, Greg Piper wanted me to let you know he will be attending the customer meeting July 21-23.
Thank you,
Lisa A. Costello
Assistant to Robert Jones
Enron Networks HR
713/853-1819
lisa.costello@enron.com |
beck-s/sent/924. | 18991370.1075856077694.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Thu, 25 Jan 2001 09:31:00 -0800 (PST) | sally.beck@enron.com | bob.hall@enron.com, brent.price@enron.com, leslie.reeves@enron.com, | ASE on February 12-13, 2001 in Dallas, TX On January 12, I hosted a brainstorming session at the Four Seasons hotel i=
n=20
downtown Houston in which we assembled a number of ideas regarding mid and=
=20
back office services we could offer to the commodity industry. To complete=
a=20
plan for launching this strategic commercial venture, we are hosting an=20
integrated design session facilitated by Cap Gemini Ernst & Young (CGEY) at=
=20
their Accelerated Solutions Environment in Dallas, Texas. =20
I am personally extending an invitation to you to participate in this desig=
n=20
session. This is a critical two-day event to be held February 12th and 13t=
h=20
in Dallas, Texas. This work session is based on a unique approach called =
a=20
DesignShop=01v. It is a very focused, activity-driven event that is compos=
ed of=20
various modules and exercises performed in small and large groups. If you=
=20
have not attended one of the DesignShops related to SAP, you will likely=20
regard this session as different from any working session you have previous=
ly=20
experienced. The prior DesignShops held in conjunction with SAP have proven=
=20
to be very successful. Therefore, we have elected to utilize this same=20
methodology on this very critical and strategic venture.
A limited number of representatives from Enron will be attending. You were=
=20
selected to be one of approximately 30 key individuals to participate in th=
e=20
DesignShop. You are being asked to participate in the full two days with as=
=20
little distraction or interruption as possible. The quality of our results=
=20
depends on each participant being fully engaged and participative for the=
=20
entire event. Additionally, you will be relied on in the future to suppor=
t=20
and communicate our commercial strategy as it is defined at this session. =
=20
This date was specifically selected to avoid critical operational periods s=
o=20
that your participation can be maximized. Therefore, please make all=20
necessary arrangements at the office to minimize your distractions during=
=20
these two days.
Please review the attached information regarding hotel, flight information,=
=20
and transportation. Preliminary information as to schedule and environment=
=20
has also been included. You may direct any additional questions concerning=
=20
the event to Mary Solmonson at (713)-853-6079.
I hope that you will be able to participate. Please confirm your attendanc=
e=20
for the two days with Marvia Jefferson at 713-853-9165 by January 29th 5:00=
=20
p.m. If you are unable to attend, it may be appropriate to select someone=
=20
else to participate. Please do not extend an invitation to anyone else to=
=20
take your place until you and I have discussed this.
I thank you in advance for your participation and look forward to seeing yo=
u=20
in Dallas! |
kean-s/deleted_items/446. | 22687025.1075862345053.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Wed, 21 Nov 2001 12:05:55 -0800 (PST) | pat.radford@enron.com | kenneth.lay@enron.com, greg.whalley@enron.com, mark.frevert@enron.com, | UPDATED Information for PR/IR Contact List Attached is an updated PR and IR Department contact list for use through this weekend. It includes additional information for Beth Tilney.
Thanks. |
keiser-k/deleted_items/194. | 31312581.1075840172292.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Fri, 11 Jan 2002 07:27:45 -0800 (PST) | m.hall@enron.com | c..gossett@enron.com, w..white@enron.com, leslie.reeves@enron.com, | Updated: *RESCHEDULED* NETCO When: Friday, January 11, 2002 3:30 PM-4:30 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where: ECS -05990
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* |
farmer-d/discussion_threads/1279. | 20232415.1075854073720.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Thu, 1 Jun 2000 10:04:00 -0700 (PDT) | ami.chokshi@enron.com | daren.farmer@enron.com, carlos.rodriguez@enron.com | Carthage (American Central) Nomination ---------------------- Forwarded by Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron on 06/01/2000
05:03 PM ---------------------------
"Steve Holmes" <Steve.Holmes@dvn.com> on 06/01/2000 04:15:11 PM
To: <Ami.Chokshi@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Carthage (American Central) Nomination
Chad called and said you guys are requestiing approximately 74,000 MMBtu
effective June 1. I show the number should be 72,240 MMBtu/d. Could you
please check into this and let me know what's going on?
Thanks,
Steve |
geaccone-t/_sent_mail/131. | 18850391.1075859055525.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Mon, 5 Feb 2001 14:10:00 -0800 (PST) | tracy.geaccone@enron.com | james.saunders@enron.com | Re: FERC Reporting Issues in SAP I do not think I need to attend this. Let me know if you feel otherwise.
Thanks |
beck-s/sent/280. | 33074253.1075855903341.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Wed, 23 Aug 2000 08:22:00 -0700 (PDT) | sally.beck@enron.com | sheri.thomas@enron.com | Your approval is requested Do you know who this is? I don't recognize the manager's name. Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 08/23/2000 03:21 PM
---------------------------
From: Information Risk Management/HOU/ECT
Subject: Your approval is requested
Security Resource Request System
Application Approval
Please review and act upon this request. You have received this eMail because
you are listed as an approver on the original request.
Instructions
For: Ashu Tewari
Request Original:
Application Name: EOL - Backoffice (US)
Request Type: Grant
Role(s): EOL- Bridge Monitor, EOL- Data Manager, EOL- Product Data Manager,
EOL- Reports, EOL- Stack Manager, EOL-FX Manager
Comments: READ ONLY...EOL Help Desk Role EOL Test and Prod Review the request in
the Request section at left.
For more information regarding who the request is for, do the following:
Click on the name for PeopleFinder info
See the Further Information section below
In the Approval Section, select Approve or Reject, enter comments as
necessary and click [Submit].
Further Information
Requestor: Ashu Tewari/NA/Enron
Manager: Keith Clark
Request Date: 08/23/2000 01:33:18 PM
RC #: 105643 WO #:
Company #: 413 Priority: High
General Comments: |
hain-m/discussion_threads/1140. | 11350557.1075860427895.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Thu, 24 May 2001 19:16:00 -0700 (PDT) | enron.announcements@enron.com | all.houston@enron.com | Investinme Course Offering Applied Finance - May 31-June 1, 2001
in EB552 Cost: $700.00
The objective of this program is not to teach you how to do a deal, but
rather, to give you a better understanding of how basic financial principals
contribute to the structure of a deal. It will also provide you with
insight to Enron deals in order that you can make a contribution to the work
that goes into putting one together.
When you leave the program, you will have:
R An understanding of basic financial and accounting issues relevant to
Enron's transactions.
R A basic understanding of how Enron structures deals - the "deal space" and
how the financial principals discussed relate to Enron deals.
R The ability to take the financial principals and apply them to an Enron
deal.
Please login and enroll through the InvestInMe website,
http://www.corptraining.com/index.cfm?company=enron. If you have any
questions, please call 713 853-0357. |
dasovich-j/notes_inbox/3436. | 22525472.1075843656691.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Fri, 11 May 2001 04:24:00 -0700 (PDT) | david.parquet@enron.com | sandra.mccubbin@enron.com | Re: California says clean air not power crisis cause Kenny's comments are absolutely false or, at best, grossly misleading. We
need to respond to him.
The NUMBER ONE problem we have in California that is delaying our proposed
power plant developments is securing ERCs. My discussions with Calpine
indicate that ERCs are their biggest problem as well. (And in case someone
hasn't noticed, the two most active developers in CAlifornia are Enron and
Calpine.) Air quality laws are definitely slowing us down, and slowing
others down, which keeps the new, cleaner plants from being developed. As I
have mentioned before, this is actually making air quality worse in that the
older, dirtier plants are running more. Further, if you do the math, we will
probably never make up for the dirty air that is created by keeping the dirty
plants in business because of grandfathering, while the clean plants don't
get done because of ever more rigorous BACT standards and lack of ERCs.
Having said that, I do not agree that we should send a message that we want
to relax or suspend the standards. (However, getting 2ppm plants on line,
which will put out of business the 100+ppm plants - as Calpine indicated to
me happened in Texas - makes the point that maybe a relaxation or suspension
is the environmentally appropriate thing to do.) All in all, though, I
believe that sucha common sense approach will go nowhere in California
because the little people in the regulatory positions as well as the public
will make sure that we pay for such a message. Having said that, I will
repeat the key things that we should be promoting, in my opinion: 1.) stop
the EPA from tightening the BACT standards to ever increasing levels of
insanity. (GE will not guarantee the present, and new, EPA requirement of
2ppm, which EPA "determined" with no new operating data. They just did it
because they could.) 2.) Stop making up rules for RACT adjustments. (Kelly
Brodbeck is working very hard, for example, to develop a program in the Bay
Area to retrofit boats with clean burning engines to create ERCs. A high
level staff guy at BAAQMD "believes" that we should be RACT adjusted,
probably making the program uneconomic. There isn't even unanimity for this
position on his staff. However, this position if it sticks is irresponsible
in light of the fact that the boats can just keep on doing what they are
doing. We are creating ERCs, which the BAAQMD will take a portion of in
their haircut, and in using the ERCs, we will eventually put out of business
the dirtier plants. So, our program gets RACT adjusted and the air gets
dirtier...) 3.) Allow for payment of mitigation fees in lieu of buying
ERCs. There is precedent for that, but this has to be run through the SIP
and the EPA. Again, the in-lieu fees can be used for gov sponsored ERC
developments (e.g., electric lawn mowers, electric water heaters, etc.),
which will clean the air. I am aware that Sandy is working with the CA
legislature on this. Go Sandy!
Sandra McCubbin@ENRON
05/11/2001 09:32 AM
To: Samuel Wehn/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: California says clean air not power crisis cause
so what is the problem? CARB says there isn't one! Think we need to
schedule some educational meetings?
----- Forwarded by Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron on 05/11/2001 09:30 AM -----
Mary Schoen
05/04/2001 12:37 PM
To:
cc:
Subject: California says clean air not power crisis cause
Friday, May 4, 2001
?
California regulators told congressional lawmakers on Thursday that clean air
regulations are not to blame for the state's electricity shortages and said
new legislation seeking to ease air quality rules was unneeded.
Speaking at a House Commerce Energy and Air Quality Subcommittee hearing, the
head of the California Air Resources Board repeatedly said environmental
regulations should not be suspended for the sake of electricity.
"Air quality laws are not interfering with California's ability to bring new
generation on line and run existing power plants at maximum capacity," said
Michael Kenny, executive officer of the board.
When asked by Democratic lawmakers on the panel about a provision in a
pending electricity bill, the California regulator said the state did not ask
for a relaxation of clean air rules and did not need the change.
"We believe that air quality-related sections of the legislation are
unnecessary," Kenny said.
Rep. Joe Barton, the Texas Republican who chairs the energy subcommittee,
said the measures allow flexibility to states for the temporary suspension of
environmental laws. He said the key point of his bill is to ensure the lights
stay on in California this summer.
The Golden State expects to face threats of blackouts starting this month,
when air conditioning use accelerates.
Objections raised by Kenny to the Barton bill included disagreement on a
section allowing the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to waive, when
asked by a state, the requirements of the federal Clean Air Act pertaining to
nitrogen oxide emissions.
Kenny said the state already gives flexibility on the issue and contended the
legislation would go too far and be problematic.
"The waiver applies to all new generation facilities in the state and does
not allow for consideration on a case-by-case (generating plant by generating
plant) basis, where unique local factors can be weighed," said Kenny. |
jones-t/all_documents/3320. | 1859828.1075846992741.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Sun, 20 Aug 2000 16:47:00 -0700 (PDT) | office.chairman@enron.com | enron_united.states@enron.com | Gifting Clubs =01&Enron has become aware that Company employees have been solicited for=
=20
participation in =01&gifting clubs.=018 These clubs appear to be illegal p=
yramid=20
schemes. If you are approached about joining a club, but aren=01,t sure if=
it=01,s=20
an illegal gifting club, contact the Better Business Bureau or your persona=
l=20
legal counsel. Employees should not in any way or manner associate Enron=
=20
Corp., its affiliated companies or Enron management with the type of clubs=
=20
described above.
Please be advised that use of the Company=01,s premises without management=
=01,s=20
prior approval or use of any of the Company=01,s communication services=20
equipment (i.e. email, fax machines, telephones, etc.) for non-Enron busine=
ss=20
related ventures is against Company policy." |
blair-l/meetings/162. | 7048510.1075853028463.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Wed, 27 Jun 2001 16:02:00 -0700 (PDT) | outlook.team@enron.com | Customer Center Direct Reports (Leagle Black, Tammy Jaquet, CALENDAR ENTRY: APPOINTMENT
Description:
Customer Center Direct Reports (Leagle Black, Tammy Jaquet, Elizabeth Brown, Larry Berger, John B. Gerry M.) Conference room 4102/ Alma-Carrillo
Date: 9/15/2000
Time: 2:00 PM - 3:00 PM (Central Standard Time)
Chairperson: Outlook Migration Team
Detailed Description: |
|
dasovich-j/deleted_items/928. | 9652729.1075852563409.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Wed, 12 Sep 2001 14:06:04 -0700 (PDT) | sgovenar@govadv.com | dasovich.jeff@enron.com, jennifer.thome@enron.com, d..steffes@enron.com | Windfall It now appears as if the Governor has told Assembly leadership that he does
not want the windfall profits tax bills on his desk. I am still trying to
get absolute confirmation. |
beck-s/sent/885. | 3598999.1075856076659.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Mon, 5 Feb 2001 07:06:00 -0800 (PST) | sally.beck@enron.com | lisa.petruszka@enron.com | Re: ASE Draft Agenda Walkthrough I will be in Calgary Wednesday and Thursday this week. Tuesday is tough,
because I am trying to finish giving performance reviews. I can make time on
Tuesday, but would prefer that we hold this to an hour. --Sally
Lisa Petruszka@ENRON
02/05/2001 12:21 PM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob M Hall/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary
Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: "Brent A. McFerren" <Brent.McFerren@us.cgeyc.com>,
david.cooke@us.cgeyc.com
Subject: ASE Draft Agenda Walkthrough
Hello folks -
As we discussed in the initial sponsor meeting, we would like to have a
preliminary walkthrough of the ASE Studio Workshop draft agenda. We are
targeting this discussion for either Tuesday or Wednesday morning and will
need about 1 to 1 1/2 hours for a thorough review. Please let me know when
you can meet and I will arrange the logistics.
Thanks
Lisa P |
griffith-j/chase_mah_stone/10. | 16177485.1075849649334.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Fri, 22 Dec 2000 06:35:00 -0800 (PST) | michael.garberding@enron.com | mary.ruffer@enron.com | Mahonia/Stoneville Prepay Mary Lynne,
Just wanted to updated you on the current prepay that is scheduled to close
next thursday (28th) with Chase and Fleet. The prepay is anticipated as
follows:
Total Funds $330,000,000
Financing Expenses:
Upfront to Banks $2,582,500
Surety Bonds $2,175,670
Total Fees $4,758,170
Anticipated Cash Flow $325,241,830
The anticipated reserve related to ENE cost of funds versus the prepay is
estimated to be ($130,501) while the timing differential between delivery
date and settlement date (55 days) is estimated to be ($2,949,879). Please
let me know if you have any questions or need any additional information.
Thanks again for your help.
Michael
31864 |
kean-s/calendar/untitled/7566. | 23184243.1075847963591.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Thu, 22 Feb 2001 01:38:00 -0800 (PST) | nicholas.o'day@enron.com | steven.kean@enron.com, sherri.sera@enron.com | Re: CONFERENCE INFORMATION I attach a brief overview of the May 15 conference.
Landmark Conference. The conference, to be held on May 15 and 16, will be the
most significant conference on energy sector deregulation in Japan this year.
We expect the Japanese press to provide extensive coverage of the conference.
Enron Orchestrating. The conference is being organized by Marcus Evans
(formerly ICM), a reputable international conference organizer, and is being
orchestrated by Enron. We are driving the timing, the seminar content and the
speakers behind the scenes.
Timing. The conference is timed to coincide with the commencement of
government deliberations on further competition reforms to Japan's
electricity market. In addition, Enron Japan will have just released a
comprehensive white paper on recommended reforms to the Japanese electricity
market.
Speakers. Mr Skilling would have the first key note speech on the first day.
He would be followed by the head of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and
Industry - the Ministry responsible for the energy sector.
Other scheduled speakers include: The president of NTT; the President of
Tokyo Electric Power Corporation; a FERC Commissioner; a senior European
regulator; former Prime Minister Hashimoto, as chairman of the Natural Energy
Promotion Association; the Dean of the Tokyo University Graduate School of
Financial Engineering; and senior management from Toyota Motor Corporation
and Asahi Chemical Corporation.
Other Meetings. We would propose meetings with: the press - one on ones
and/or, if appropriate, a press conference; senior Government officials
(Ministerial level); senior commercial relationships (Chairman/ CEO level) eg
Orix Corp., Tokyo Electric Power Corp., Itochu Corp., Hitachi Group, Kawasaki
Group.
I look forward to hearing from you.
Kind regards
Maureen McVicker
02/22/2001 01:13 AM
To: Nicholas O'Day/AP/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: CONFERENCE INFORMATION
Nick:
Steve would like you to send to him and Sherri Sera the information about the
May 15th conference.
Sherri said that Jeff Skilling might be able to make the conference. He
needs to be back in the states on May 17th - so she will need to check on the
flights.
I'll let you know as soon as they have decided for sure.
Thanks. |
germany-c/discussion_threads/1923. | 1602590.1075853775432.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Wed, 8 Nov 2000 07:10:00 -0800 (PST) | chris.germany@enron.com | oash@dom.com | Storage Transfer Please transfer the storage balance of 420 dth from contract 530750 to VNG
contract 300008.
Thanks |
cuilla-m/inbox/35. | 7222926.1075853095846.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Mon, 29 Oct 2001 19:06:37 -0800 (PST) | no.address@enron.com | All Enron Worldwide@ENRON <??SAll Enron Worldwide@ENRON> | Lexis-Nexis Training: Houston & Worldwide / Dow Jones Training eSource Presents Lexis-Nexis Training
Basic
Lexis-Nexis Basic is geared to the novice or prospective user. You will learn the basics of getting around Nexis.com.
We will talk about news and company information available on Lexis-Nexis.
Attend our Lexis-Nexis Basics Clinic:
November 6 1:00 - 2:00 PM EB572
Due Diligence
This session will focus on the specific
company, public records, and other sources available on Lexis-Nexis that help
you find all possible aspects of a company's business and strengths or
liabilities.
Attend our Lexis-Nexis Due Diligence Clinic:
November 6 2:30 - 4:00 PM EB572
Seats fill up fast! To reserve a seat, please call Stephanie E. Taylor at 5-7928.
The cost is $100.00 per person.
No-shows will be charged $200.00.
* Please bring your Lexis-Nexis login ID and password. If you don't have one, a guest ID will be provided.
* * *
eSource presents free Lexis-Nexis Online Training
Using Placeware, an interactive web learning tool, you can participate in this training session from anywhere in the world.
Basics
Lexis-Nexis Basic is geared to the novice or prospective user. You will learn the basics of getting around Nexis.com and of the news and company information available on Lexis-Nexis.
Attend our Lexis-Nexis Basics Online Clinic:
November 14 10:00 AM Central Standard Time
Please RSVP to Stephanie E. Taylor at 713-345-7928 or stephanie.e.taylor@enron.com.
We will email instructions for Placeware to you.
* Note: If the time scheduled is not convenient to your time zone, please let us know so we can schedule other sessions.
* * *
eSource Presents Dow Jones Interactive Training
Introduction to Dow Jones Interactive: Personalizing/Customizing DJI and Custom Clips
You will learn how to tailor DJI to display information that is most helpful to you.
You will learn how to create your own Personal News page to view headlines from your chosen publications and your custom clip folders.
Custom clips can be set up to automatically send to you important news about any key topic or company information that affects your business decisions.
Attend one of our Dow Jones Interactive Basics Clinics:
November 14 1:00 - 2:00 PM EB560
November 14 3:00 - 4:00 PM EB560
Advanced
Learn how to be more efficient on Dow Jones Interactive. Put some power tools to work for you.
Learn how to employ codes, use search history, and customize. Hands on time is provided.
Attend our Dow Jones Interactive Advanced Clinic:
November 14 2:00 - 3:00 PM EB560
Seats fill up fast! To reserve a seat, please call Stephanie E. Taylor at 5-7928.
The cost is $100.00 per person.
No-shows will be charged $200.00.
*******
Check the eSource training page at http://esource.enron.com/training.htm for additional training sessions and vendor presentations. |
haedicke-m/all_documents/244. | 32977540.1075845001580.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Fri, 31 Mar 2000 09:08:00 -0800 (PST) | mark.haedicke@enron.com | rob.walls@enron.com | Re: Inquiry Thanks. We are in litigation with the Px. Let me know if she continues to
pursue Enron. Mark |
germany-c/sent_items/1152. | 16833755.1075845150931.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Fri, 25 May 2001 12:17:52 -0700 (PDT) | chris.germany@enron.com | ingrid.immer@williams.com | RE: I would leave early if I were you.
-----Original Message-----
From: "Immer, Ingrid" <Ingrid.Immer@Williams.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Immer+2C+20Ingrid+22+20+3CIngrid+2EImmer+40Williams+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 2:11 PM
To: Germany, Chris
Subject:
My car will be ready today at 4:00! My only concern is that traffic going I-10 west will be horrendous! |
gay-r/all_documents/68. | 9200421.1075849797089.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Tue, 19 Dec 2000 01:51:00 -0800 (PST) | rob.gay@enron.com | christiaan.huizer@enron.com | Re: EPE Dispatch Thanks Christiaan,
but, why not 2 combustion turbines at 90 MW's each and the steam turbine fro
whatever we can get?
Christiaan Huizer@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
12/19/2000 06:20 AM
To: Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Laine A Powell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard A
Lammers/SA/Enron@Enron, Tracee Bersani/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Felipe
Ospina/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: EPE Dispatch
Rob,
Regarding items 1 and 2, please contact Lucio Reis in Sao Paulo office and he
can explain.
Item 3 is incorrect. The 300 MW would be generated by the two gas turbines at
about 100 MW each and the remaining 100 MW coming from the steam turbine. The
steam turbine receives its energy from the exit gases from the gas turbines
and they both contribute equally to the resulting steam turbine output
(theoretically at least, in practice depending on optimization of machines)
Again, please talk with Lucio.
Regards,
Christiaan
Rob G Gay@ENRON
12/18/2000 04:41 PM
To: Laine A Powell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Christiaan
Huizer/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard A Lammers/SA/Enron@Enron
cc: Tracee Bersani/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EPE Dispatch
Here is what we have concluded based on discussions this morning:
1) We believe that Furnas has agreed to contract and pay for 300 MW on oil to
meet regulatory requirements concerning required capacity and reserve
margin. We do not believe that they intend for us to be dispatrched above
220 MW. (Do we have any document which could substantiate this?)
2) Although dispatch on a merit order basis would suggest that EPE runs full
time (with 300 MW available), there are practical constraints in the
transmission system which will prohibit this from actually occuring. [ Please
describe these constraints using some official sounding jargon but minimal
detail and in particular indicate what is involved to de-bottleneck and how
long this will take. I presume that Furnas is solely responsible for the
corrective measures.]
3) Based on our analysis, the optimal operating approach would be to generate
220MW with one turbine and 91 MW with the other for a total of 311 if
dipatched above 220 MW.
If we can prove that 1) & 2) are correct or convince the lenders that they
are, then I think we can suggest that fuel oil exposure is negligibe if gas
is ready by April 01. We will have to see how it looks when we add the Sue
Garvin flex months.
Therefore, a merit order analysis is only necessary if i) our supposition
about Furnas' motivations are incorrect and/or ii) the transmission problem
is cleared. If this happens it would be nice to be able to predict reduced
fuel utilization due to a) reduced dispatch during daily off-peak hours or
seasonal impacts, b) due to scheduled outages, and c) due to managing our
availabilty in such a way as to reduce fuel consumption operating losses.
Any data you can provide will be helpful.
Have I successfully connected the dots here?
If you have previously sent these materials to Felipe or Tracee please simply
grumble to yourself if you have to do an extra e-mail to me. Remember, you
don't have to be nice to a short timer unless you need them to get something
done.
Regards,
Rob |
hain-m/all_documents/1033. | 8554024.1075860374011.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Wed, 14 Feb 2001 03:38:00 -0800 (PST) | mary.hain@enron.com | mday@gmssr.com | CAISO Notice: EOB subpoena I hope you saw this. I was out of the office and unable to get my E-mails.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 02/14/2001 11:46 AM
---------------------------
Susan J Mara@ENRON
02/12/2001 01:30 PM
To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan
Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: CAISO Notice: EOB subpoena
ANother subpoena
Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 02/12/2001 01:27 PM -----
CRCommunications <CRCommunications@caiso.com>
02/12/2001 10:31 AM
To: ISO Market Participants
<IMCEAEX-_O=CAISO_OU=CORPORATE_CN=DISTRIBUTION+20LISTS_CN=ISO+20MARKET+20PARTI
CIPANTS@caiso.com>
cc:
Subject: CAISO Notice: EOB subpoena
To Market Participants and Scheduling Coordinators:
The ISO received a subpoena from the Electricity Oversight Board ("EOB")
Friday afternoon. The subpoena is attached. The subpoena requires response
by today. The ISO will mark as confidential documents it produces to the EOB
that contain information subject to 20.3.2, and will request confidential
treatment in accordance with the EOB's prior agency opinion letters
discussing treatment of confidential information. Concerns related to the
subpoena should be directed directly to the Electricity Oversight Board. The
EOB contact related to the subpoena is Eric Saltmarsh who can be reached at
(916) 322-8601. The ISO would appreciate being notified also of any
concerns. The ISO contacts are Jeanne Sol, at jsole@caiso.com and Norma
Formanek at <mailto:nformanek@fbm.com> nformanek@fbm.com both of whom
should be copied on correspondence.
Jeanne M. Sol,
Regulatory Counsel
California ISO
(916) 608-7144
____________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________
The Foregoing e-Mail Communication (Together With Any Attachments Thereto)
Is Intended For The Designated Recipient(s) Only. Its Terms May Be
Confidential And Protected By Attorney/Client Privilege or Other Applicable
Privileges. Unauthorized Use, Dissemination, Distribution, Or Reproduction
Of This Message Is Strictly Prohibited.
- Subpoena.pdf |
delainey-d/all_documents/418. | 31655128.1075854438397.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Fri, 11 Aug 2000 07:20:00 -0700 (PDT) | beverly.stephens@enron.com | scott.neal@enron.com, mike.miller@enron.com, rogers.herndon@enron.com, | Dinner Meeting Revisions There has been a change in the monthly dinner meeting as follows:
DATE: August 14, 2000
PLACE: The Map Room
Brennan's
3300 Smith
713/522-9711
TIME: 6:30 PM
Please make a note of these changes. I will look forward to seeing you
there. |
hyvl-d/sent/587. | 25570368.1075842285778.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Tue, 5 Jun 2001 02:09:00 -0700 (PDT) | dan.hyvl@enron.com | sschneider@aep.com, mlcarriere@aep.com | Re: Contract Alteration Please review the attached revised document. I left the references to
Louisiana in the document because of all the changes to section numbers and
exhibits that deletion of that section would cause. At some time in the
future, I will modify to delete, but it should be okay with the references
left in for the time being. Additionally, I suspect that we may need to
leave it in because we may need to generate a version for the LEG system that
AEP has in Louisiana. Let me know if you think we need any other changes. |
guzman-m/notes_inbox/1025. | 26894765.1075840717938.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Tue, 27 Feb 2001 05:38:00 -0800 (PST) | pete.davis@enron.com | pete.davis@enron.com | Start Date: 2/27/01; HourAhead hour: 14; <CODESITE> Start Date: 2/27/01; HourAhead hour: 14; No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.
LOG MESSAGES:
PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001022714.txt
---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
Details: (Hour: 14 / Preferred: 165.91 / Final: 164.91)
TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
LOAD_ID: SCE1
MKT_TYPE: 2
TRANS_DATE: 2/27/01
SC_ID: EPMI |
farmer-d/tufco/355. | 16433656.1075854175796.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Mon, 27 Nov 2000 02:16:00 -0800 (PST) | mjones7@txu.com | daren.j.farmer@enron.com, ggreen2@txu.com, cstone1@txu.com, | HPL Nom for November 28, 2000 (See attached file: HPLN1128.xls)
- HPLN1128.xls |
delainey-d/sent/734. | 16749680.1075854533109.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Fri, 9 Feb 2001 02:43:00 -0800 (PST) | david.delainey@enron.com | tim.belden@enron.com | Congratulations Tim, I appreciate the note and the comments - I may need some of your help in
the future as we bring this patient back to health.
Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 02/09/2001
10:41 AM ---------------------------
From: Tim Belden 02/08/2001 09:04 AM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Congratulations
As a shareholder I am extremely happy that you are heading over to EES.
There is a business there. They just need some help with the execution and
implementation.
I'm sorry to see you leave ENA. The management style that you and John have
brought to this organization is the best I've seen. The attention to details
and teamwork are really impressive. Personally, I want to say thanks for all
of the support that you have provided to me and the West Power Team over the
last year. Everything from acknowledging our suceessful business model to
helping us to refine it through improved metrics in the middle market to
supporting me and my guys through the PRC process has been greatly
appreciated!
With EES' large position in the west I'm sure we will be working together in
the future. Let me know if there is anything that I can do to help. Good
luck.
Regards,
Tim |
kaminski-v/notes_inbox/136. | 28647260.1075857054144.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Tue, 5 Dec 2000 04:26:00 -0800 (PST) | kevin.moore@enron.com | vince.kaminski@enron.com | Re: Avistar Training for Vince Kaminski Hello Vince ,
We will be doing a session of Avistar Training on Thursday , Dec. 7th.
The scheduled time is 2:45 p.m. at your location on 32nd floor.
Vince J Kaminski
11/02/2000 02:58 PM
To: Kevin G Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Avistar Training for Vince Kaminski
Kevin,
I would like to take the class as well.
Vince
Kevin G Moore
10/31/2000 06:34 AM
To: Phillip Daigle/Corp/Enron@Enron, Cedric Belt/Corp/Enron@Enron, Paige
Cox/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jose Marquez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mike A
Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Avistar Training for Vince Kaminski
Actually , Mike Roberts , Jose Marquez and myself will need the basics.
This will be greatly appreciated.
Please get with me on a time whereby I can inform the others.
Thanks
Kevin Moore
---------------------- Forwarded by Kevin G Moore/HOU/ECT on 10/31/2000 07:28
AM ---------------------------
Paige Cox@ENRON
10/30/2000 02:30 PM
To: Phillip Daigle/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Cedric Belt/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kevin G Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Avistar Training for Vince Kaminski
Philip,
Please schedule some time with Kevin Moore (34710) to go up to 3240D and
train Vince Kaminski on the Avistar system. Please show Vince and Kevin the
basics, and take them the documentation as well.
Kevin has left for the afternoon. Please call him in the morning (Tuesday) to
schedule a time
Thanks
Paige |
griffith-j/skew/15. | 24823311.1075849679099.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Fri, 30 Mar 2001 02:30:00 -0800 (PST) | dutch.quigley@enron.com | jeremy.wong@enron.com, dave.wei@enron.com, richard.burchfield@enron.com | Skew Project Jeremy,
The final checks have been made to the skew evaluation for the ERMS
Production.
The test post id's that Dave Wei has provided have been check and are correct.
This email is the official request to move the volatility skew evaluation
into production.
Please contact me with any questions at 713-853-9257
Dutch |
dasovich-j/all_documents/1253. | 19367346.1075842965630.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Fri, 8 Sep 2000 05:38:00 -0700 (PDT) | cynthia.sandherr@enron.com | jeff.dasovich@enron.com | Steve's testimony Jeff: will you accompany Steve? If so, the Committee needs you to bring at
least 75 copies of the attached testimony with you to give to the Committee
Clerk to "satisfy the anticipatied public interest." I would suggest you
bring more.....
---------------------- Forwarded by Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron on 09/08/2000
01:45 PM ---------------------------
Elizabeth Linnell
09/08/2000 12:44 PM
Sent by: Elizabeth Linnell
To: Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Steve's testimony
Attached is the final version. |
jones-t/sent/1655. | 25499676.1075847190557.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Wed, 9 Aug 2000 07:10:00 -0700 (PDT) | tana.jones@enron.com | frank.davis@enron.com, sheri.thomas@enron.com, stephanie.sever@enron.com | Counterparty Approvals for 8/7/00 and 8/8/00 On the referenced list, Credit shows River Trading Company as an amended
counterparty, but I didn't have them at all so I treated them like a new
counterparty.
On the 8/8/00 List, Braintree is a division, and I would like it to read:
City of Braintree, Massachusetts Electric Light Department.
the name on Spinnaker is wrong, Credit will be correcting it to read
Spinnaker Exploration Company L.L.C. |
derrick-j/sent_items/200. | 21351527.1075845097012.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Wed, 28 Mar 2001 09:19:09 -0800 (PST) | james.derrick@enron.com | j.harris@enron.com | FW: India meeting w/Lay & Skilling Steph,I will attend this.
-----Original Message-----
From: Brelsford, Loretta
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 10:57 AM
To: McDonald, Rebecca; Hughes, James A.; Walls, Rob; Lundstrom, Bruce; Glisan, Ben; Derrick Jr., James; Whalley, Greg
Cc: Hicks, Debra; Blackwood, Connie; Hoelscher, Wendi; Dauterive, Inez; Fleming, Rosalee; Williamson, Joannie; Harris, Stephanie J; Taylor, Liz
Subject: India meeting w/Lay & Skilling
You are invited to attend a meeting this Friday at 10am to review current India issues with Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling.
The meeting is scheduled for 1 hour in EB50M03. |
baughman-d/deleted_items/268. | 11417789.1075840334493.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Mon, 7 Jan 2002 10:36:01 -0800 (PST) | wincash@play4keeps.com | don.baughman@enron.com | Guaranteed $5000 Credit Approval! $5,000 Credit Card or $30,000 Business Line of Credit. Guaranteed!
No Credit Check - No Annual Fees - No Security Deposit Required!!
Bad Credit – No Credit – You’re approved! You cannot be turned down!
Call our credit processing center - 24 hours / 7 days a week
Call Today 314-344-1111
Must Give Approval Code P4K
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Sign up for Cash Games and Receive $10 FREE!
http://www.play4keeps.com/rd.cgi?cashgames
<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>
* To remove yourself from this mailing list, point your browser to:
http://i.pm0.net/remove?freebiecash:14
* Enter your email address (don.baughman@enron.com) in the field
provided and click "Unsubscribe". The mailing list ID is "freebiecash:14".
OR...
* Reply to this message with the word "remove" in the subject line.
This message was sent to address don.baughman@enron.com
X-PMG-Recipient: don.baughman@enron.com
<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>
pmguid:39.1b8p.9h08x |
kaminski-v/deleted_items/320. | 18922906.1075840758133.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Fri, 18 Jan 2002 17:05:25 -0800 (PST) | arsystem@mailman.enron.com | j.kaminski@enron.com | Approval is Overdue: Access Request for naveen.andrews@enron.com This request has been pending approval for 4 days and you are the alternate. Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000081005&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.
Request ID : 000000000081005
Approver : sandeep.kohli@enron.com
Request Create Date : 1/15/02 1:04:06 PM
Requested For : naveen.andrews@enron.com
Resource Name : \\enehou\houston\common\Research - [Read/Write]
Resource Type : Directory |
delainey-d/inbox/16. | 5521186.1075860781515.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Thu, 10 Jan 2002 12:29:42 -0800 (PST) | janet.dietrich@enron.com | david.oxley@enron.com, michelle.cash@enron.com, kriste.sullivan@enron.com, | Employee reinstatement We have offered re-employment to Dierdre McCaffrey and she has accepted effective today. We need to reinstate her back to December 5, 2001. Robert Jones is handling all needed paperwork,etc. Dierdre was in EGM-Freights Markets prior to being terminated on 12/03/01. Prior to EGM, she spent numerous years in various positions in wholesale gas structuring, trading, and origination. She was instrumental in identifying, evaluating, and negotiating most of our gas asset management transactions. She worked with Laura Luce and team on the Peoples' Gas transactions, and she will be critical in ensuring we maintain and optimize these contracts and positions going forward. She will be working with Laura Luce in the Enron Estate.
Thank you. |
kean-s/sent/1392. | 18808037.1075848249681.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Wed, 25 Apr 2001 00:58:00 -0700 (PDT) | steven.kean@enron.com | maureen.mcvicker@enron.com | <<Concur Expense Document>> - General Expenses ---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 04/25/2001
07:58 AM ---------------------------
eserver@enron.com on 04/24/2001 11:28:52 AM
To: "Steven.J.Kean@enron.com" <Steven.J.Kean@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: <<Concur Expense Document>> - General Expenses
The following expense report is ready for approval:
Employee Name: John Hardy Jr Jr.
Status last changed by: Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: General Expenses
Report Total: $16,374.97
Amount Due Employee: $0.00
To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur
Expense.
http://xms.enron.com |
farmer-d/discussion_threads/4892. | 17118141.1075854297216.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Fri, 23 Mar 2001 07:21:00 -0800 (PST) | robert.cotten@enron.com | daren.farmer@enron.com | April, 2001 Gathering Contracts Daren,
FYI.
Bob |
fischer-m/all_documents/429. | 13116563.1075840451318.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Fri, 12 Jul 2002 04:36:00 -0700 (PDT) | kurt.anderson@enron.com | gverkleeren@zilkha.com | Re: FW: RE: Revised Availability Numbers Gary, thank you very much for your feedback. I apologize for the content of
the reports sent to you yesterday. With respect to the content of those
reports, it is obvious that more work is required on our part. We will
expedite that process and provide revised reports once again as soon as
possible. I promise you that Joe Thorpe, Jeff Duff, Mark Fisher, and myself
will perform a thorough review of the new data set prior to distribution.
The May monthly report which was sent to your attention earlier today, was
delayed at my request to ensure that the correct methodology was utilized
when calculating availability, at this time further revisions to that report
may be required. In the future, Jeff Duff and I will ensure that the monthly
reports are delivered as contractually required.
Regards
KA
"Gary Verkleeren" <GVerkleeren@zilkha.com> on 07/12/2002 10:48:27 AM
To: <kurt.anderson@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: RE: Revised Availability Numbers
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gary Verkleeren
> Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 1:27 PM
> To: 'kurt.anderson@ps.ge.com'
> Cc: Rick Winsor; Joan Quick; Mark Haller
> Subject: RE: Revised Availability Numbers
>
> Kurt,
>
> After performing an initial review of the revised availability numbers,
which included performing spot checks on specific turbines, I have decided to
discontinue any additional efforts on my part to validate the revised
numbers. The basis for my decision includes but is not limited to the
following:
>
> 1) The summary letter which accompanied the revised availability tables
states:
>
> "To differentiate for times when the turbine is transitioning between
states as per design, calculations have determined that during each month a
turbine will have between one and two hours meeting the above conditions.
For this reason, the times determined using the conditions above (i.e. "zero
power availability") were decreased by 1.5 hours to account for the as
designed transitioning times."
>
> I reject applying this rule. A turbine is available to run or it is
not available to run. If a turbine remains down on repair for seven
consecutive days its availability for that seven day period is zero. No
credit should be applied for as designed transitioning times - at least this
is how I interpret the contract.
>
> 2) On May 23, 2002 you received an email from me regarding the April
Monthly Reports. My email to you made specific reference to MR WTG#9 and its
improperly reported availability. On June 13, 2002, Mark Fisher, Joe
Thorpe and I spent the entire day reviewing the availability calculation
procedures, methodology, and reporting. MR WTG#9 happened to be a specific
turbine in which we worked through the entire availability calculation. Both
Mark Fisher and Joe Thorpe agreed that the reported availability was
incorrect by approximately 5 percentage points. Why was MR WTG#9 not revised
for the month of April?
>
> 3) Your summary letter mentions low data recovery of 10-minute data for the
December 01 time period. Based on my understanding from Mark Fisher, the Mon
files
> form the basis for your availability reporting. My availability analysis
which primarily included investigation of the 10-minute data was frowned upon
by Hollis Kimbrough and he mentioned several problems with my method. He
stated that the Mon files have a much higher data recovery rate. Did the
10-minute data form the basis for your revised availability tables?
>
> 4) In addition to MR WTG#9 as mentioned above, I have internal
documentation that suggests that the revised availability percentage on MR
WTG#2 for the month of February remains on the order of 3 to 4 percentage
points high.
>
> I recommend performing a more thorough review of the available information
including SCADA files, maintenance records, and repair logs and then
revisiting the recently reported numbers. Please recall that I am requesting
actual turbine availabilities uncorrected for maintenance allowances. The
revised numbers make no distinction. I am also in need of complete monthly
reports for both PA projects for the month of May which should have been
received by June 20th.
>
> Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you would like to discuss
these matters in further detail.
>
> Regards,
>
> Gary
>
> Gary Verkleeren
> Zilkha Renewable Energy
> 68 Braddock Drive
> Ohiopyle, PA 15470
>
> Office: 724 434-1542
> Mobile: 724 554-0924
> Fax: 724 434-1543
>
> |
dasovich-j/all_documents/3279. | 6680390.1075843025524.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Thu, 9 Nov 2000 03:50:00 -0800 (PST) | dhunter@smithandkempton.com | athomas@newenergy.com, cohnap@sce.com, anw@cpuc.ca.gov, | AB 1890 Speakers, Moderators and Panelists Folks-
Just a reminder that if you will be including overheads, slides, handouts,
or any other info as part of your speech, discussion, or panel please send
said info to me via email or fax ASAP so that I can make adequate copies for
the Group. If you are so inclined as to make your own copies I would
recommend making 90 copies to cover all attendees.
Also, we will be providing an overhead projector and an LCD projector (for
power point presentations) for your use. If you require some other type of
A/V equipment please let me know ASAP.
Thanks to you all for agreeing to be a part of our Retreat. I expect it to
be quite an event. Please contact me if you have any questions.
Thanks again,
Delaney |
grigsby-m/_sent_mail/31. | 31844730.1075855617422.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Sun, 1 Apr 2001 13:54:00 -0700 (PDT) | mike.grigsby@enron.com | cathy@intelligencepress.com | Re: Join the Enron Site license Yes, Please forward me the login and password again. I would like to be
included in Enron's corporate wide license.
Thanks,
Mike Grigsby |
campbell-l/all_documents/1840. | 828830.1075857905976.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Tue, 22 May 2001 04:01:00 -0700 (PDT) | owner-nyiso_tech_exchange@lists.thebiz.net | nyiso_tech_exchange@global2000.net | $20,000 DAM adder barkerde@nmenergy.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:
Some feed back so far...... There appears to be a problem brewing with the
planned implementation of the May 29 adjustment that removes the $20K bias
from
the DAM external transactions.I am awaiting a call back on my concerns from
the
NYISO. By occasionally settling hourly prices through BME or occasionally
settling after SCD sets RT prices, depending on the extistence or non
existence
of congestion, a problem that we thought we fixed many months ago will
reappear
with the removal of the $20K bias.Here is an example of my musings....
DAM bid gets accepted at $50 ( Import from PJM) ..... BME then runs (No
constraints) evaluating the import HAM bids and other items that have
BMEprovide a $40 price.... DAM gets cut , looks like a $10 profit (
providing
your loss in PJM doesn't exceed $10) . Due to in hour operations the RT price
clears at $60. You loooooooose!! Sound familiar? After getting beat up like
this the MP's went through the committee structure and had the $20,000 adder
used for DAM (except IS+) to protect against this. The clearing at BME for all
external proxy busses removed the problem so the $20,000 adder was removed.
Now
the external interfaces only clear at BME if they are constrained. Are we
taking
a huge step back on purpose or was there a mistake in implementation? |
horton-s/discussion_threads/312. | 3736653.1075844952981.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Mon, 17 Jul 2000 10:53:00 -0700 (PDT) | gisb1@aol.com | shorton@enron.com | Greater Houston Partnership Stan -
Late last week, I spoke with Roxane Richter regarding the GISB article in the
"Houston: Energy Capital" document. She may want a quote from you as our
chairman and willing to provide you with several. The document will be
widely distributed throughout Houston, energy companies and energy trade
shows. As soon as I get a draft, I will forward it on to you and the other
Editorial Review Board members. Rae |
dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5917. | 440577.1075843764523.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Thu, 4 Jan 2001 06:13:00 -0800 (PST) | steven_t_sweet@calpx.com | market_participant_ab1@calpx.com, market_participant_cd2@calpx.com, | PX files with the US Court of Appeals The CalPX has taken the following action. Please review and refer to our
website for a complete copy of the FERC filing.
(See attached file: CalPX sues FERC.doc)
- CalPX sues FERC.doc |
derrick-j/deleted_items/248. | 17949921.1075861416654.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Mon, 19 Nov 2001 16:05:22 -0800 (PST) | thomas.riehle@ipsos-reid.com | james.derrick@enron.com | Public Perceptions on Continental Energy - Additional Link Dear James Derrick,
We hope you are now in receipt of preliminary results from Ipsos-Reid's Public Perceptions on Continental Energy as reported in the prestigious National Journal sent on Friday. As well, we have included a hyperlink to our November 17th 2001 presentation to the Senate Leadership entitled Public Opinion on Energy Issues and National Energy Policy and the press release resulting from that day's press conference. Your organization might really benefit from seeing the whole survey, which will be completed shortly after Thanksgiving. This survey is the largest poll ever conducted on public opinion about energy issues in North America. To discuss this further, please contact me, Thomas Riehle, President of Ipsos-Reid U.S. Public Affairs at (202) 463-7300.
I look forward to reviewing this opportunity with you and your organization.
Thom Riehle
Link to press release and slide presentation:
http://www.ipsos-reid.com/us/media/content/displaypr.cfm?id_to_view=1356 |
kaminski-v/discussion_threads/3982. | 31613200.1075856426154.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Tue, 24 Apr 2001 10:40:00 -0700 (PDT) | vince.kaminski@enron.com | vkaminski@aol.com | Re: Weather and energy price Data ---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/24/2001
05:40 PM ---------------------------
Enron North America Corp.
From: Elena Chilkina 04/19/2001 01:49 PM
To: mlwang@uts.cc.utexas.edu, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Weather and energy price Data
Mulong,
Please find attached a file with Henry Hub natural gas prices. The data
starts from 1995 and given on the daily basis, please let us know when we
can proceed with electricity prices.
Sincerely,
Elena Chilkina
Vince J Kaminski@ECT
04/16/2001 08:19 AM
To: mulong wang <mlwang@uts.cc.utexas.edu> @ ENRON
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elena Chilkina/Corp/Enron@Enron,
macminnr@uts.cc.utexas.edu
Subject: Re: Weather and energy price Data
Mulong,
We shall send you natural gas Henry Hub prices right away.
Please look at the last winter and the winter of
95/96.
We shall prepare for you the electricity price
information (Cinergy, Cobb and Palo Verde) but
you have to approach FT (the publishers of
Megawatts Daily, a newsletter that produces the price
index we recommend using) and request the permision
to use the data. We are not allowed to distribute
this information.
Please, explain that this is for academic research and that
we can produce the time series for you,
conditional on the permission from the publishers
of Megawatts Daily.
Vince Kaminski
mulong wang <mlwang@uts.cc.utexas.edu> on 04/15/2001 03:43:26 AM
To: vkamins@ect.enron.com
cc: Richard MacMinn <macminnr@uts.cc.utexas.edu>
Subject: Weather and energy price Data
Dear Dr. Kaminski:
I am a PhD Candidate under the supervision of Drs. Richard MacMinn and
Patrick Brockett. I am now working on my dissertation which is focused on
the weather derivatives and credit derivatives.
Could you kindly please offer me some real weather data information about
the price peak or plummet because of the weather conditions?
The past winter of 2000 was very cold nationwide, and there may be a
significant price jump for natural gas or electricity. Could you
please offer me some energy price data during that time period?
Your kind assistance will be highly appreciated and have a great day!
Mulong |
kean-s/attachments/1318. | 12396682.1075851033620.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Fri, 13 Jul 2001 01:47:00 -0700 (PDT) | steven.kean@enron.com | sarah.novosel@enron.com | Re: PJM RTO Order Great summary. I think the two main issues you raise are the right ones, but
I have one other thought we should discuss internally. Do we want to create
a set of incentives for the management of PJM that would entitle management
to incentive compensation to the extent they meet certain goals -- eg
relieving congestion on the grid, increasing throughput across the
transmission system, expediting interconnection (measured in terms of actual
interconnections not just applications approved), etc. This way we could
create an organization that would have the incentive to make a workable and
open transmission system.
From: Sarah Novosel on 07/13/2001 07:57 AM
To: Kevin M Presto/Enron@EnronXGate, Mark Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Ader/HOU/EES@EES, Edward D Baughman/Enron@EnronXGate, Joe
Gordon/Enron@EnronXGate, Janelle Scheuer/Enron@EnronXGate, mbrown9@enron.com,
Mark Bernstein/HOU/EES@EES, John Llodra/Enron@EnronXGate, W David
Duran/Enron@EnronXGate, George Wood/Enron@EnronXGate, Dave
Perrino/SF/ECT@ECT, Paul J Broderick/Enron@EnronXGate, Jason
Thompkins/Enron@EnronXGate, Mason Hamlin/Enron@EnronXGate, Robert
Stalford/Enron@EnronXGate, Tom May/Enron@EnronXGate, Gautam
Gupta/Enron@EnronXGate, Narsimha Misra/Enron@EnronXGate, Steve
Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron, Garrett Tripp/Enron@EnronXGate, Berney C
Aucoin/Enron@EnronXGate, Jason Thompkins/Enron@EnronXGate, Rob
Wheeler/Enron@EnronXGate, Rogers Herndon/Enron@EnronXGate, Jim
Meyn/Enron@EnronXGate, Aleck Dadson/Enron@EnronXGate, Daniel
Allegretti/Enron@EnronXGate, Pearce W Hammond/HOU/EES@EES, Donna
Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Howard Fromer/NA/Enron@Enron, Kathleen
Sullivan/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tom Hoatson/Enron@EnronXGate, Thane
Twiggs/Enron@EnronXGate, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Charles Decker/HOU/EES@EES, Nick
Politis/Enron@EnronXGate, sscott3@enron.com, Aleck Dadson/Enron@EnronXGate,
Lloyd Will/Enron@EnronXGate, Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Susan M
Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron, Charles Yeung/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andy
Rodriquez/Enron@EnronXGate, John J Lavorato/Enron@EnronXGate, Louise
Kitchen/Enron@EnronXGate, Greg Whalley/Enron@EnronXGate,
susan.j.mara@enron.com, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen
Denne/Enron@EnronXGate, mpalmer@enron.com, Alan Comnes/Enron@EnronXGate, Tom
Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron, John Shelk/NA/Enron@Enron, Pat
Shortridge/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chris Long/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mike
Roan/ENRON@enronXgate, Kerry Stroup/NA/Enron@Enron, Janine
Migden/Enron@EnronXGate, Dave Mangskau/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: PJM RTO Order
Attached is a summary of the PJM RTO order. While it is somewhat lengthy,
the order has a lot of good information in it that I wanted to share with the
group, particularly the Commission's statements regarding the existing
configuration of the northeast and the need to expand it.
We are working on summaries of the New York and New England RTO orders and
will have those out shortly. If you would like copies of the orders, just
let us know.
We expect the mediation proceeding to begin within the next week. We will
keep you updated.
Sarah |
germany-c/all_documents/489. | 10929151.1075853673256.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Thu, 26 Oct 2000 03:58:00 -0700 (PDT) | chris.germany@enron.com | dave.scott@enron.com, jeffrey.porter@enron.com, victoria.versen@enron.com | Re: Daily volumes for 10/26 and 10/27 Maybe we should add another section to Mr. Scott's worksheet for "Third
Party" buy's and sells (like the Aquilla deal #452810) and the deal we did
on the 7th where ENA bought the gas back from New Power. Not a big deal for
October, but we will probably start doing our maunal billing process again
for the winter months. I could see you guys buying incremental third party
gas that we may need to schedule, especially during high pipeline constraints.
Example: You might buy gas from Sempra at Eagle into CGAS and we use your
transport to get it to a citygate. ENA would buy it from New Power at Eagel
and sell it back to New Power at the citygate. We should let you know what
the deal ticket number is via email or phone call and Scott could put it on
the worksheet.
So if we had this tab for October, it would just have 2 deals on it so far.
Comments? |
germany-c/all_documents/332. | 1428731.1075853669756.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Tue, 28 Nov 2000 07:51:00 -0800 (PST) | chris.germany@enron.com | jim.homco@enron.com, judy.townsend@enron.com | Revised # 3 Judy said that because I'm so busy, you probably shouldn't bother me with
this doyal stuff. She wants to handle that.
I luv her!!
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 11/28/2000 03:50
PM ---------------------------
From: Jim Homco 11/27/2000 10:03 AM
To: Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victoria Versen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris
Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Revised # 3
OK so now IT is open ...
Bottom line I would like to call on 6970 at sta 85 ( 6838 delivered).
Let me know what days you are going to enter the call... |
beck-s/inbox/687. | 1088595.1075862309780.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Fri, 16 Nov 2001 10:43:20 -0800 (PST) | enron_update@concureworkplace.com | sally.beck@enron.com | <<Concur Expense Document>> - 11/09/2001 The following expense report is ready for approval:
Employee Name: Kevin G. Sweeney Mr.
Status last changed by: Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: 11/09/2001
Report Total: $1,310.50
Amount Due Employee: $1,310.50
To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://expensexms.enron.com |
campbell-l/inbox/1138. | 12632231.1075855286309.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Tue, 11 Dec 2001 13:39:51 -0800 (PST) | no.address@enron.com | Enron Houston@ENRON <??SEnron Houston@ENRON> | ATTENTION: Downtown Club (MET) Members Payroll deductions and cost center billings for The Downtown Club (Met) memberships will terminate December 31, 2001. Memberships will continue through a direct billing arrangement with The Downtown Club.
As most of you are aware, Enron has maintained a valuable partnership with The Downtown Club for the past two years, and they have graciously offered the following for current and future members:
**********************************************************
The Downtown Club is pleased to continue to offer the preferred dues rates to current/former Enron employees. The Downtown Club would like to assist you and keep you connected to the Downtown Community and help you maintain a healthy lifestyle during these challenging times.
Membership Offer:
1) WAIVED Initiation Fee through 2/28/2002
2) Sports Membership Preferred Monthly Dues of $62.79 (plus tax) honored
through December 2002
3) All Memberships are via direct monthly billing to the member
For more information - please contact Membership at 713.652.0700.
If you do not wish to keep your membership, please email your cancellation notice to mailto:georgia.fogo@enron.com as soon as possible.
*************************************
The Downtown Club is pleased to partner with Resources Connection
for a wonderful Member Benefit:
Join us December 20th from 9 a.m. to 2 p.m .for a complimentary
Career Crisis Workshop
featuring Bonnie Monych, CPC
focusing on:
Dealing with career crisis
Climate control (What's hot and who's hiring)
Me, Inc. (Marketing yourself)
Lunch is provided * RSVP is required to Keith at 713.289.3853 *
Limited Seating
*************************************
Thank you. |
badeer-r/discussion_threads/89. | 9802493.1075863598496.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Tue, 25 Jul 2000 02:18:00 -0700 (PDT) | robert.badeer@enron.com | fxhall@yahoo.com | Fran,
What is your phone number?
Bob |
kean-s/calendar/untitled/1958. | 869129.1075846324257.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Wed, 15 Nov 2000 22:00:00 -0800 (PST) | steven.kean@enron.com | john.baker@daniel.com | Re: Thank you for taking time out of your schedule to speak at Rice Thanks, I enjoyed it too and would be happy to do it again.
John Baker <John.Baker@daniel.com>
11/15/2000 07:47 AM
To: "'skean@enron.com'" <skean@enron.com>
cc: "'Christie_Patrick@enron.com'" <Christie_Patrick@enron.com>
Subject: Thank you for taking time out of your schedule to speak at Rice
Steven,
Thank you for visiting with my class at Rice last night. They thoroughly
enjoyed your talk -- after you left for the evening, we had a good
discussion on topics that you had raised. My apologies again for the room
mix up; somehow between myself, the university, and my secretary, the
classroom assignment changed several times and the update did not get to
you.
Next year, if your schedule permits, perhaps you would consider a return
engagement. I would certainly enjoy having you back.
Regards,
John
John A. Baker
Director of Information Technology
Fisher-Rosemount / Daniel (A Division of Emerson Electric)
9753 Pine Lake Drive
Houston, TX 77055
713-827-3328
John.Baker@daniel.com |
bass-e/notes_inbox/138. | 1504399.1075854666480.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Mon, 4 Dec 2000 14:52:00 -0800 (PST) | bryant@cheatsheets.net | cheatsheets@egroups.com | [cheatsheets] #150 Week 15 Upgrades - Downgrades (12-4-00) Hi Folks
It's crunch time so let's jump right into our Upgraded and Downgraded=20
Players.? As we head down the home stretch, identifying those players movi=
ng=20
up or down can be the difference between?dominating the playoffs or watchi=
ng=20
from the sidelines.? As we head into our 15th week of listing these player=
s,=20
it=01,s inevitable that some guys will have made both the upgrade or downg=
rade=20
list.? Make sure you understand, what we=01,re talking about is players th=
at=20
are moving.? In other words, a player like TE Ricky Dudley could appear on=
=20
the downgrade list and still be good enough to be a starter in your league=
.?=20
It just means I=01,m concerned about the way he seems to be heading.? Like=
wise,=20
a player like WR Willie Jackson may make the upgrade list even though he=
=01,s=20
still fairly far down the list of WRs.? It=01,s all about which direction=
=20
players are moving.? Keeping an eye on these trends as they can very often=
=20
make all the difference.
Joe
?
Upgrades and Downgrades.? Some of these players are obvious moves up or=
=20
down and some aren't as clear.? Here's my list of guys I see moving this=
=20
week.
QBs Moving Up?
QB Aaron Brooks (NO)? We keep hyping the kid and he keeps delivering.? =20
Another outstanding game Sunday where he rolled up 441 yards and 2 TDs as h=
e =20
went 30 for 48.? The Saints rushing game is clearly struggling so it appea=
rs=20
Brooks will continue to air the ball out.? Yes, he'll make some young QB=
=20
mistakes and I'd be surprised if he didn't throw as many interceptions as =
he=20
does TDs.? I expect him to throw a lot of both.? I almost started him over=
=20
Peyton Manning in my local league but didn't pull the trigger.? Manning wa=
s=20
solid but Brooks was better.
QB Kordell Stewart (Pit)? Kordell made our upgrade list last week and here=
=20
he sits again.? It took a few years, but he's showing folks that maybe 199=
7=20
was no fluke.? He showed guts coming back in the game after being knocked=
=20
out with a bad knee or calf (depending on whether you listen to coach Bill=
=20
Cowher or Stewart)? The TD rush was highlight material.? His problem all=
=20
along seems to have been confidence and he's surely brimming with it now.?=
=20
Kent Graham was so bad I won't even mention him in the downgrades but he p=
ut=20
on a horrid display when he was in the game.? He's awful.
QB Jay Fiedler (Mia)? Dan Fouts said on Monday Night Football a few weeks=
=20
ago that a nice pass just thrown by Fiedler "was as pretty as anything Dan=
=20
Marino ever threw".? Fiedler has those moments and he was having them fair=
ly=20
often against the supposedly tough Bills where they were supposedly going =
to=20
have an advantage in their cold weather.? Didn't play out that way.?=20
Fiedler looks pretty darn good.
QB Jeff Garcia (SF)? We had him high in week 14 like we have all year and=
=20
he didn't disappoint.? WR Terrell Owens was a huge help and apparently=20
Jerry Rice's wife?harping on the radio had some sort of positive effect.? =
=20
The Chargers had been very tough against the pass and Garcia shredded them=
.
QB Brett Favre (GB)? I have a hard time putting a finger on it but this gu=
y=20
just does what it takes to get the job done.? He'd be much better off if W=
R =20
Antonio Freeman earned 10% of his paycheck but in the meantime, Bill=20
Schroeder's doing a great job.?=20
QB Jeff George (Was)? Lil Danny Snyder removed the primary obstacle to=20
keeping his QB Jeff George off the field by firing Norv Turner Monday.?=20
George looks to start this week and possibly for the rest of the year.?=20
Although tying Snyder to anything past the next series is a stretch.? I'm =
a=20
Jeff George fan though and he does give the team a big arm.? We'll see how=
=20
it goes but at least it looks as if he'll get his shot.
?
RBs Moving Up
RB Mike Anderson (Den)? Like you need me to tell you this.? The fact that=
=20
he ran buck wild on a tough New Orleans defense made the effort all the=20
more impressive.? He bruised a knee but seemed to bounce back and looks to=
=20
be good for Sunday.? Clearly, the Denver OL is the star on this team so if=
=20
you own Anderson, it's probably not a bad idea to grab KaRon Coleman for t=
he=20
stretch run.?=20
RB Fred Taylor (Jac)? For all the early?ripping I've done to Taylor, he's =
=20
performed just as we predicted he would lately - like a madman.? You don't =
=20
need me to tell you he's been awesome.
RB Warrick Dunn (TB)? Can the little guy take up the slack for Mike=20
Alstott?? I've got a couple hundred reasons that says "yes".? Ok, rushing=
=20
for 200+ against Dallas is nothing special (it's happened in 23% of the=20
Cowboys games this year) but you have to admit Dunn looked great Sunday.?
RB Corey Dillon (Cin)? One can only salivate about what he might do if he=
=20
played for a team like Denver.? The fact he can continue to roll up huge=
=20
yardage on this team is amazing.? New QB Scott Mitchell is a huge boost as=
=20
he looks like Peyton Manning back there compared to Akili Smith...
RB Ahman Green (GB)? Green's a guy that's finally living up to his =20
potential.? You always knew he had the physical skills but now he seems to =
=20
be catching up mentally as well.? He showed a nice nose for the endzone =20
Sunday with the 2 TDs.
RB Lamar Smith (Mia)? So much for the cold weather hamstring worries.?=20
Smith carried the load Sunday in frigid Buffalo and looked great.? It look=
s=20
to me like he's picking up right where he left off.
RB Terrell Fletcher (SD)? It's not exactly the same as earning the startin=
g=20
RB job in Tennessee or Indianapolis, but Fletcher does seem to have nailed=
=20
down the #1 RB slot in San Diego.? And that's worth something.? You have t=
o=20
decide how much...
RB Fred Beasley (SF)? We loved Beasley early in the season as he racked up=
=20
TDs.? He got back in the mix Sunday with 5 carries and a TD.? The FB for S=
an=20
Francisco has always been a valuable FF slot and Beasley might be worth th=
e=20
roll of the dice if you're thin at RB.
RB Shawn Bryson (Buf)? Finally, Bryson does something besides make me look=
=20
bad for hyping him.? He rolled up 88 yards on just 12 attempts Sunday and=
=20
looks to take advantage of Sammy Morris' ankle troubles.?=20
RB Terry Allen (NO)? Allen made an appearance Sunday and with Jerald Moore=
=20
and Chad Morton failing to astound anyone, Allen could get more looks.?=20
Whether he's got anything left in the tank remains to be seen.
?
WRs Moving Up
WR David Boston (Ari)?? Boston turned in a huge game Sunday and has to be =
=20
considered an upgrade.? He's a streaky guy but with Frank Sanders a total =
=20
non factor, Boston is getting most of QB Jake Plummer's attention these =20
days.? And with Arizona almost certain to be playing from behind, he could =
=20
do some damage.
WR Darrell Jackson (Sea)? Jackson was red hot several weeks ago but had=20
cooled of late.? He warmed up again Sunday with Jon Kitna under center.?=
=20
It's tough to depend on the Seahawk passing game but Jackson could be wort=
h=20
a shot.
WR Curtis Conway (SD)? Conway has benefited the most from the Ryan Leaf =
=20
resurgence.? He caught 7 passes Sunday and should benefit as Leaf continues=
=20
to improve.
WR Willie Jackson (NO)? Jackson's officially moved past the "flash in the=
=20
pan" stage with another solid day.? Aaron Brooks continues to look good at=
=20
QB.? Jackson may suffer a bit when Jake Reed gets healthy but for right no=
w,=20
he's looking good.
WR Joe Horn (NO)? Again, QB Aaron Brooks delivers and Horn is the prime =
=20
recipient.? Joe Horn is one of the better stories of 2000 and he should =20
continue to shine especially if the rushing game doesn't get untracked.
WR Bobby Shaw (Pit)? Shaw may still be available in your league as the=20
starting WR opposite Hines Ward.? He found the endzone again and continues=
=20
to make some noise with Kordell Stewart quarterbacking.
WR Terrell Owens (SF)? The best news for Jeff Garcia owners had to be a=20
solid day from Terrell Owens.? He's a huge boost to the offense when he ca=
n=20
go and it looked like he'd made progress with the toe.? Keep an eye out fo=
r=20
how he responds after the game but I liked what I saw.
WR Shockmain Davis (NE)? Ok, I'll be honest.? I'm pretty much just includi=
ng=20
him here because he's the owner of the coolest name in the league...
?
TEs Moving Up
TE Dwayne Carswell (Den)? Carswell's finally starting to emerge as the TE =
of=20
choice in Denver.? His 62 yards Sunday were second only to San Diego's=20
Freddie Jones.? You have to worry about Desmond Clark stealing time but I'=
d=20
have no trouble starting Carswell each week.
TE Reggie Kelly (Atl)? One of the few bright spots for Atlanta has been th=
e=20
play of Kelly.? He caught 4 passes for 44 yards Sunday with a TD.? New QB =
=20
Doug Johnson may lean on him as he settles in.
TE Mark Bruener (Pit)? Bruener makes the list not only for having another=
=20
solid game but for making one of the best TD runs after the catch Sunday a=
s=20
he piggy backed a defender into the endzone after refusing to go down at t=
he=20
5 yard line.
TE Andrew Glover (NO)? Obviously, the play of Aaron Brooks raises the leve=
l=20
of play for all the Saints receivers.? Glover made a couple of nice plays=
=20
Sunday including a good looking TD catch.
?
Players Moving Down
QBs Moving Down
QB Shane Matthews (Chi)? Take a seat Shane.? Cade McNown likely makes his =
=20
return.? Folks can hardly wait...
QB Troy Aikman (Dal)? Emmitt Smith owners had to love it but did it seem=
=20
strange to anyone else that the Cowboys felt the best way to come back fro=
m=20
a huge deficit against Tampa was to feed the ball to Emmitt?? Clearly, the=
=20
team has zero faith in Aikman's ability to throw the ball.
QB Shaun King (TB)? I know he's had trouble with the back but 65 passing =
=20
yards?? That's a joke.? He'll be better but I've seen enough.
QB Brad Johnson (Was)? It's the Jeff George show.? At least until?George =
=20
looks bad for a few series...
QB Rob Johnson (Buf)? In leagues that penalize for interceptions, you'd ha=
ve=20
been better off starting yourself this weekend than you would've Rob=20
Johnson.? Once again, he starts the game but finishes holding a clipboard=
.
?
RBs?Moving Down
RB Jamal Anderson (Atl)? Anderson's not playing too badly but the team is=
=20
in shambles.? After QB Chris Chandler was benched, Anderson vented some =
=20
frustrations saying for all he knew, "he might be punting this week".? I =
=20
don't think we'll see that but I also don't think we'll see the days of him=
=20
seriously rushing the ball for the rest of the year.
RB Shaun Alexander (Sea)?? RB Ricky Watters has proven to be less than an=
=20
ideal playmate refusing to share the ball.? Actually, he's played so well=
=20
that Mike Holmgren has been reluctant to do anything to disrupt the flow o=
f=20
his star.? When the team is struggling as badly as it is, you don't mess=
=20
with the one thing that's working.
Philadelphia RBs? Forget about them.? This team will live and die by =20
Donovan McNabb.
RB Jermaine Fazande (SD)? Evidently, Fazande is the 2nd choice behind=20
Terrell Fletcher now.? That's gotta hurt...
?
WRs Moving Down
WR Joe Jurevicius (NYG)? This has nothing to do with the play of Jureviciu=
s=20
as he's been very solid but you have to think Ike Hilliard will be a facto=
r=20
when he returns.? He's no lock to go this week but he may be close.
WR Terrance Mathis (Atl)? Mathis continues to struggle on a team that's in=
=20
a tailspin.? New QB Doug Johnson seemed to like throwing to Shawn Jefferso=
n =20
which could spell more bad things for Mathis.
WRs Torrance Small / Charles Johnson (Phi)? Forget about it.? Donovan McNa=
bb=20
can be a solid QB without WRs.
WRs James McKnight / Wayne McGarity (Dal)? These guys just aren't very=20
McGood.? QB Troy Aikman is a mere shadow of his former self.
WR Marcus Robinson (Chi)? Robinson's back troubles were apparently more=20
serious than many had expected.? It was announced Monday that he'll likely=
=20
miss the rest of the season with a bulging disk in his back.? It appears h=
e=20
can get by without surgery but he's certainly not looking good.
?
TEs Moving Down
TEs Marcus Pollard / Ken Dilger (Ind)? Neither of these guys did much=20
Sunday.? This offense clearly isn't in the same groove it was earlier this=
=20
year.? =20
TEs Jackie Harris / David LaFleur (Dal)? More bad news associated with Tro=
y=20
Aikman.? Neither of these guys were much value Sunday and I don't see that=
=20
changing very quickly.
TE Pete Mitchell (NYG)? One of the bigger disappointments at TE this seaso=
n,=20
he just can't get untracked.
?
?
?
?
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cheatsheets-unsubscribe@egroups.com |
germany-c/_sent_mail/1439. | 3694630.1075853844918.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Thu, 16 Mar 2000 00:38:00 -0800 (PST) | chris.germany@enron.com | joan.veselack@enron.com, joann.collins@enron.com, robert.allwein@enron.com, | Month to Date CGAS numbers Would you guys please give the latest CGAS number for CES? You know, thats
where you give the total volume delivered by day on ENA, CALP, and Dayton
transport.
Thanks |
donoho-l/inbox/junk_file/304. | 25436072.1075860946300.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Fri, 22 Feb 2002 14:08:57 -0800 (PST) | info@energyclasses.com | lindy.donoho@enron.com | Project Finance Week - March 11-15, New York City <HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Language" CONTENT="en-us">
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=windows-1252">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="Microsoft FrontPage 4.0">
<META NAME="ProgId" CONTENT="FrontPage.Editor.Document">
<TITLE>Project Finance Week</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF">
<DIV ALIGN="center">
<CENTER>
<TABLE BORDER="0" CELLPADDING="3" CELLSPACING="3" WIDTH="600">
<TR>
<TD COLSPAN="2"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="http://www.pmaconference.com/imagesemail/id000040/id00004.jpg" WIDTH="595" HEIGHT="146"></TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD COLSPAN="2">
<P ALIGN="center"><FONT FACE="Verdana" SIZE="2"><B>Project Finance Week</B><BR>
March 11-15, 2002 </FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT FACE="Verdana" SIZE="2">?
Metropolitan Hotel, New York City<BR>
<A HREF="http://www.pmaconference.com/pfwbro_pma.pdf">Click Here To
Download A Complete Conference Brochure</A></FONT></FONT></TD>
</T!
R>
<TR>
<TD WIDTH="600" COLSPAN="2"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="http://www.pmaconference.com/imagesemail/id000040/id00007.gif" WIDTH="595" HEIGHT="22"></TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD WIDTH="600" COLSPAN="2"><FONT FACE="Verdana" SIZE="2">Infocast?s <B>Project
Finance Week</B> continues to be rated the best introductory course on
project finance available to developers, financiers, attorneys, utility
representatives and vendors. Course #1, Project Finance The Tutorial,
has been revamped for the new realities of 2002, offering in-depth
sessions on today?s hottest financing trends, including portfolio
financing, synthetic leasing, and risk management strategies for
merchant financing. These in-depth sessions will be enhanced by hearing
the lessons learned by active participants in many of the top project
financings of 2001.</FONT></TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD WIDTH="300"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="http:!
//www.pmaconference.com/imagesemail/id000040/id00005.gif" WIDTH="295" HEIGHT="77"></TD>
<TD WIDTH="300"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="http://www.pmaconference.com/imagesemail/id000040/id00006.gif" WIDTH="295" HEIGHT="77"></TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD VALIGN="top"><FONT FACE="Verdana" SIZE="2" COLOR="#000000">? </FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana" SIZE="2">The
Contractor?s Perspective On Construction, Completion And Performance
Risk<BR>
</FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana" SIZE="2" COLOR="#000000">? </FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana" SIZE="2">The
Role Of Credit Ratings In Project Financed Transactions<BR>
</FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana" SIZE="2" COLOR="#000000">? </FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana" SIZE="2">Structuring
The Project As A Synthetic Lease<BR>
</FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana" SIZE="2" COLOR="#000000">? </FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana" SIZE="2">Structuring
Your Project And Getting Financing In The Post Enron Collapse
Environment<BR>
!
</FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana" SIZE="2" COLOR="#000000">? </FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana" SIZE="2">Real-World
Acquisitions And Divestitures Of Distressed Projects</FONT></TD>
<TD VALIGN="top"><FONT FACE="Verdana" SIZE="2" COLOR="#000000">? </FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana" SIZE="2">Moving
From Commercial Agreements To Financeable Contract<BR>
</FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana" SIZE="2" COLOR="#000000">? </FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana" SIZE="2">Translating
And Negotiating The ?Underwriting? Term Sheet<BR>
</FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana" SIZE="2" COLOR="#000000">? </FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana" SIZE="2">Completion
Issues<BR>
</FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana" SIZE="2" COLOR="#000000">? </FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana" SIZE="2">Fuel
& Tariffs<BR>
</FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana" SIZE="2" COLOR="#000000">? </FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana" SIZE="2">The
Loan Agreement - Locating And Defusing The Land Mines<BR>
</FONT><FONT FACE="Verd!
ana" SIZE="2" COLOR="#000000">? </FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana" SIZE="2">The
Security Agreements<BR>
</FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana" SIZE="2" COLOR="#000000">? </FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana" SIZE="2">Consents
& Opinions<BR>
</FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana" SIZE="2" COLOR="#000000">? </FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana" SIZE="2">Review
Of Additional Issues Common To International Projects</FONT></TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD COLSPAN="2"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="http://www.pmaconference.com/imagesemail/id000040/id00008.gif" WIDTH="595" HEIGHT="22"></TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD COLSPAN="2">
<P ALIGN="center"><FONT FACE="Verdana" SIZE="2">WORKSHOP #1: 8:00 AM -
12:00 PM<BR>
<B>Negotiating and Documenting the Key Project Agreements</B></FONT></P>
<P ALIGN="center"><FONT FACE="Verdana" SIZE="2">WORKSHOP #2: 1:30 PM -
5:00 PM<BR>
<B>Predicting the Price of Power for Asset Valuation in Merchant Power
Fin!
ancings</B></FONT></TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD COLSPAN="2"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="http://www.pmaconference.com/imagesemail/id000040/id00007.gif" WIDTH="595" HEIGHT="22"></TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD COLSPAN="2">
<P ALIGN="center"><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT FACE="Verdana" SIZE="2"><A HREF="http://www.pmaconference.com/pfwbro_pma.pdf">Click
Here To Download A Complete Conference Brochure</A></FONT></FONT></TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
</CENTER>
</DIV>
</BODY>
</HTML> |
carson-m/_sent_mail/62. | 14995835.1075858200005.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Thu, 7 Sep 2000 03:56:00 -0700 (PDT) | mike.carson@enron.com | clint.dean@enron.com | 7:00 Saturday,,,2633 cason in West U |
griffith-j/all_documents/57. | 32677428.1075849633967.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Fri, 8 Dec 2000 01:29:00 -0800 (PST) | jaime.williams@enron.com | john.griffith@enron.com | Re: Recordatorio: reunion con Enron John, I am sending you the daily gas consumption of Copamex....Best regards.
---------------------- Forwarded by Jaime Williams/NA/Enron on 12/08/2000
09:30 AM ---------------------------
abmontesdeoca@copamex.com on 12/06/2000 04:42:16 PM
To: Lvallest@gcc.com
cc: Jaime.Williams@enron.com
Subject: Re: Recordatorio: reunion con Enron
---------------------- Forwarded by Abelardo Montes de Oca
Guillermo/PACHISA/GRUPO COPAMEX on 05/12/2000 10:31 AM
---------------------------
Abelardo Montes de Oca Guillermo
05/12/2000 10:18 AM
To: "Luis Javier Valles Terrazas" <lvallest@gcc.com>
cc:
Subject: Re: Recordatorio: reunion con Enron (Document link: Database
'Abelardo Montes de Oca Guillermo', View '($Sent)')
Envio los consumos copamex
Nos vem,os al rato
montes
(See attached file: consumos_copamex.xls)
- consumos_copamex.xls |
jones-t/all_documents/9945. | 11536742.1075847318712.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Thu, 8 Mar 2001 03:00:00 -0800 (PST) | postmaster@kpmg.com | tana.jones@enron.com | Delivered: NDA - KPMG Consulting <<NDA - KPMG Consulting>> Your message
To: mboyd@kpmg.com
Cc: Michael.Bridges@enron.com; Mark.Greenberg@enron.com
Subject: NDA - KPMG Consulting
Sent: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 10:59:32 -0500
was delivered to the following recipient(s):
Boyd, Michael J on Thu, 8 Mar 2001 11:00:14 -0500
MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:US:USDALEXC05
Message-ID: <OF0D0CC646.76C966C4-ON86256A09.005765ED@enron.com>
From: Tana.Jones@enron.com
To: mboyd@kpmg.com
Cc: Michael.Bridges@enron.com, Mark.Greenberg@enron.com
Subject: NDA - KPMG Consulting
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 10:59:32 -0500
Return-Receipt-To: Tana.Jones@enron.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
X-MS-Embedded-Report:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
kitchen-l/_americas/hr/33. | 2620857.1075840852291.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Fri, 2 Nov 2001 06:56:28 -0800 (PST) | karen.buckley@enron.com | john.suarez@enron.com, martin.cuilla@enron.com, f..brawner@enron.com, | ENA Trading Track All,
Thank you for your time yesterday interviewing for the ENA Trading Track. I would be grateful if you would not discuss feedback with any of the candidates until all offers are confirmed. I will advise you when candidates have been notified.
Thanks once again.
Regards,
Karen. |
brawner-s/discussion_threads/118. | 24625576.1075856126935.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Mon, 30 Apr 2001 07:45:00 -0700 (PDT) | outlook.team@enron.com | ann.vaughn@enron.com, wilson.barbee@enron.com, estalee.russi@enron.com, | 4-URGENT - OWA Please print this now. Current Notes User:
REASONS FOR USING OUTLOOK WEB ACCESS (OWA)
1. Once your mailbox has been migrated from Notes to Outlook, the Outlook
client will be configured on your computer.
After migration of your mailbox, you will not be able to send or recieve mail
via Notes, and you will not be able to start using Outlook until it is
configured by the Outlook Migration team the morning after your mailbox is
migrated. During this period, you can use Outlook Web Access (OWA) via your
web browser (Internet Explorer 5.0) to read and send mail.
PLEASE NOTE: Your calendar entries, personal address book, journals, and
To-Do entries imported from Notes will not be available until the Outlook
client is configured on your desktop.
2. Remote access to your mailbox.
After your Outlook client is configured, you can use Outlook Web Access (OWA)
for remote access to your mailbox.
PLEASE NOTE: At this time, the OWA client is only accessible while
connecting to the Enron network (LAN). There are future plans to make OWA
available from your home or when traveling abroad.
HOW TO ACCESS OUTLOOK WEB ACCESS (OWA)
Launch Internet Explorer 5.0, and in the address window type:
http://nahou-msowa01p/exchange/john.doe
Substitute "john.doe" with your first and last name, then click ENTER. You
will be prompted with a sign in box as shown below. Type in "corp/your user
id" for the user name and your NT password to logon to OWA and click OK. You
will now be able to view your mailbox.
PLEASE NOTE: There are some subtle differences in the functionality between
the Outlook and OWA clients. You will not be able to do many of the things
in OWA that you can do in Outlook. Below is a brief list of *some* of the
functions NOT available via OWA:
Features NOT available using OWA:
- Tasks
- Journal
- Spell Checker
- Offline Use
- Printing Templates
- Reminders
- Timed Delivery
- Expiration
- Outlook Rules
- Voting, Message Flags and Message Recall
- Sharing Contacts with others
- Task Delegation
- Direct Resource Booking
- Personal Distribution Lists
QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS?
If you have questions or concerns using the OWA client, please contact the
Outlook 2000 question and answer Mailbox at:
Outlook.2000@enron.com
Otherwise, you may contact the Resolution Center at:
713-853-1411
Thank you,
Outlook 2000 Migration Team |
derrick-j/all_documents/55. | 14171227.1075842915548.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Fri, 1 Dec 2000 03:50:00 -0800 (PST) | james.derrick@enron.com | mimmergut@milbank.com | Organizational Changes Mel, thank you for lunch. It was great to see you and catch up. Here's th=
e=20
memo I mentioned. All the best. Jim
---------------------- Forwarded by James Derrick/Corp/Enron on 12/01/2000=
=20
11:48 AM ---------------------------
Stephanie Harris
11/08/2000 05:17 PM
To: James Derrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: =20
Subject: Organizational Changes
----- Forwarded by Stephanie Harris/Corp/Enron on 11/08/2000 05:17 PM -----
=09Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling
=09Sent by: Enron Announcements
=0911/08/2000 04:59 PM
=09=09=20
=09=09 To: All Enron Worldwide
=09=09 cc:=20
=09=09 Subject: Organizational Changes
We are making a number of significant organizational changes. These change=
s=20
are intended to accomplish four key objectives:
First, we need to realign all our wholesale businesses around the successfu=
l=20
business model developed over the last decade in North America and Europe. =
=20
This model relies on extensive physical and transactional networks built=20
around a relatively small strategic asset position.
Second, we need to significantly streamline corporate reporting=20
relationships. Particularly with Joe Sutton=01,s departure, the ability to=
=20
directly manage the day-to-day activities of 15 independent business units=
=20
has become increasingly difficult.
Third, we need to accomplish these changes without, in any way, compromisin=
g=20
the ongoing profitability of all our businesses and without delaying or=20
hindering our effort to monetize a significant portion of our lower-yieldin=
g=20
asset positions.
And fourth, as always, we need to take advantage of the reorganization to=
=20
redeploy our talent into our highest value opportunities.
ENRON WHOLESALE SERVICES
Today, we are forming Enron Wholesale Services (EWS) which will consolidate=
=20
our global wholesale businesses. The closer alignment of our wholesale=20
businesses will accomplish the following: (1) enhanced communication and=20
coordination across business units, (2) more rapid deployment of people to=
=20
higher valued opportunities, (3) more effective prioritization of=20
opportunities across the wholesale business, and (4) more rapid extension o=
f=20
Enron=01,s wholesale business model and capabilities into new industries an=
d=20
markets.
Enron Wholesale Services will include our current North American, European=
=20
(including Japan and Australia), Global Markets, and Industrial Markets=20
operations, and will be expanded to include Enron=01,s Net Works business u=
nit=20
as well as a new unit =01) Enron Global Assets. In addition, Enron=01,s me=
rchant=20
businesses outside of North America and Europe will be integrated into this=
=20
new structure as described below.
Mark Frevert, currently Chairman of each of our wholesale units, will assum=
e=20
the role of Chairman and CEO of Enron Wholesale Services. Greg Whalley,=20
currently Chairman and CEO of Enron Net Works, will join Mark in the Office=
=20
of the Chairman as President and Chief Operating Officer.
Providing further impetus for these organizational changes, several of our=
=20
international business unit leaders have elected to move into new leadershi=
p=20
positions:
Rebecca McDonald, currently CEO of Enron APACHI, will join EWS as President=
=20
and CEO of Enron Global Assets. Enron Global Assets will have responsibilit=
y=20
for managing all of Enron=01,s existing energy asset portfolio outside of N=
orth=20
America and Europe. Joining Rebecca in the Office of the Chairman as COO=
=20
will be Jim Hughes, currently COO of Enron APACHI. Rebecca and Jim will=20
report to the EWS Office of the Chairman.
Sanjay Bhatnagar, currently CEO of Enron India, has joined EBS as CEO for t=
he=20
Middle East and Asia region. Sanjay will be responsible for building our=
=20
broadband business in this region and the current EBS team in this region=
=20
will report to Sanjay. In this role, Sanjay will report to the EBS office =
of=20
the Chairman. In addition, Sanjay will continue to remain responsible for=
=20
Enron=01,s wholesale energy business in India and will transition this busi=
ness=20
into Enron Global Assets in the near future.
=20
Diomedes Christodoulou, currently Co-CEO of Enron South America, has joined=
=20
EBS as Chief Commercial Officer. Diomedes will be located in London and wi=
ll=20
focus his origination activities on global opportunities, with near term=20
attention to the wholesale and enterprise sectors. Diomedes will report to=
=20
the EBS Office of the Chairman.
Jim Bannantine, currently Co-CEO of Enron South America, will be joining EE=
S=20
to lead EES=01, commercial efforts outside North America and Europe. In or=
der=20
to ensure a smooth transition for our South American businesses and to=20
facilitate our asset sales activities, Jim will remain in South America for=
=20
at least the next several months and continue to serve as CEO of Enron Sout=
h=20
America. Throughout the transition, Jim will report to Cliff Baxter and to=
=20
the Office of the Chairman of Enron Wholesale Services. Following the=20
transition, Jim will join EES.
In addition to these changes in our international asset operations=20
activities, we are making the following changes in our merchant wholesale=
=20
businesses and the commercial support functions:
Enron Net Works
Louise Kitchen will assume Greg=01,s previous responsibilities as President=
and=20
CEO of Enron Net Works, reporting into Mark and Greg. =20
Enron Americas
Concurrent with the transfer to Enron Global Assets of responsibility for=
=20
operating Enron=01,s South and Central America asset base, all trading,=20
marketing, and new asset development activities in these regions will repor=
t=20
into a new entity, Enron Americas. Enron Americas will have responsibility=
=20
for all wholesale merchant businesses across North, Central and South=20
America. Dave Delainey, President and CEO, and John Lavorato, Chief=20
Operating Officer will comprise the Office of the Chairman for Enron=20
Americas.
Enron Europe
The Enron Europe organization, which includes Enron=01,s businesses in Aust=
ralia=20
and Japan, and Enron Metals, remains unchanged under the leadership of John=
=20
Sherriff, President and CEO, and Michael Brown, Chief Operating Officer.
Enron Global Markets
Enron Global Markets, under the leadership of Mike McConnell, President and=
=20
CEO, and Jeff Shankman, Chief Operating Officer, will continue to have=20
responsibility for Enron=01,s Middle East and LNG operations. With the=20
exception of Ecoelectrica in Puerto Rico, all operating power plants and=20
associated personnel in the Caribbean and Central America will transfer to=
=20
Enron Global Assets. Enron Global Markets will also continue to manage the=
=20
commodity businesses in crude and products, coal, weather, insurance,=20
equities, interest rates, foreign exchange, and agricultural products.
Enron Industrial Markets
Enron Industrial Markets=01, organization, under the leadership of Jeff McM=
ahon,=20
President & CEO, and Ray Bowen, Chief Operating Officer, remains unchanged.
Commercial Support for EWS
The commercial support functions for EWS will remain with, and be managed b=
y,=20
the individual business units. We are creating no incremental overhead in=
=20
the creation of EWS, and in fact hope to reduce our operating costs by more=
=20
efficient utilization and sharing of resources across EWS.
To this end we have asked several people to take on an expanded role across=
=20
EWS in addition to their ongoing roles within their business units. These=
=20
newly defined roles are as follows:
Mid and Back Office Operations =01) Sally Beck will lead Mid and Back Offic=
e=20
Operations across EWS. These services will become part of Enron Net Works,=
=20
with Sally reporting to Louise Kitchen and Rick Causey, Executive Vice=20
President and Chief Accounting Officer. This alignment creates a coordinat=
ed=20
services organization with IT and e-commerce platforms to support the=20
wholesale businesses and to maximize opportunities to commercialize these=
=20
services. Mid and Back Office services for all commercial activities will=
=20
continue to be organized with dedicated operations controllers responsible=
=20
for specific commodities and/or geographic locations.
Legal =01) Mark Haedicke will serve in the role of General Counsel for EWS.
Regulatory and Government Affairs =01) This function will remain organized =
on a=20
regional basis. Rick Shapiro will support all EWS businesses operating in=
=20
the Americas, and Mark Schroeder, who is based in London, will support all=
=20
European and Eastern Hemisphere operations. Rick and Mark will also contin=
ue=20
to support all other Enron businesses operating in their respective regions=
=20
and will continue to report to Steve Kean, Executive Vice President and Chi=
ef=20
of Staff.
Public Relations =01) This function is also organized primarily on a region=
al=20
basis. Eric Thode will have responsibility for North American activity,=20
Enron Net Works, and Enron Industrial Markets. Jackie Gentle will continue=
=20
in her role for Enron Europe (including Japan and Australia) and John Amble=
r=20
will have responsibility for activity outside North America and Europe as=
=20
well as providing support for Enron Global Markets and Enron Global Assets.=
=20
These individuals will also continue to have a split reporting relationship=
=20
to Mark Palmer, Vice President of Communications.
Business Analysis and Reporting =01) Wes Colwell will expand his role to co=
ver=20
EWS reporting in addition to his current role in North America.
Attached for your review is an organization chart for Enron Wholesale=20
Services which summarizes the changes described here. As this organization=
=20
continues to evolve we will keep you informed of any additional changes.
ENRON GLOBAL EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION
AND ENRON WIND
As part of our company-wide initiative to examine our assets and investmen=
ts=20
around the world, we are considering a variety of options with respect to=
=20
EGEP and EWC. As a consequence, we are putting these businesses under Clif=
f=20
Baxter=01,s direction. Jeff Sherrick, CEO of EGEP, and Jim Noles, CEO of E=
nron=20
Wind, will report to Cliff.
CORPORATE STAFF
We are consolidating the corporate staff functions: Human Resources,=20
Government Affairs, Public Relations/Communications and Administration. In=
=20
that regard, Cindy Olson, Executive Vice President of Human Resources and=
=20
Community Relations, will report to Steve Kean, Executive Vice President an=
d=20
Chief of Staff.
COMMITTEE STRUCTURE
In light of the increased leadership opportunities created by Enron=01,s=
=20
growth, the Executive Committee will be expanded to include more of our=20
business unit leaders. The primary role of this committee will continue to=
=20
be the communication of relevant information across Enron=01,s businesses a=
nd=20
the coordination of activities across those businesses. We will also be=20
drawing on this group to lead company-wide initiatives such as the=20
performance review process and evaluation and creation of new businesses. =
=20
The Executive Committee membership is shown on the attached list.
We are also forming a new committee =01) the Enron Corporate Policy Commit=
tee. =20
This group will be responsible for overall corporate policy, personnel=20
management policy and corporate strategy. The Enron Corporate Policy=20
Committee membership is also shown on the attached list.
We are confident that these changes will align our talent and our capital =
to=20
our highest return opportunities. Please join us in congratulating and=20
supporting all of these individuals in their new roles. |
jones-t/all_documents/12203. | 4257743.1075847388500.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Wed, 30 May 2001 10:34:00 -0700 (PDT) | tana.jones@enron.com | marcus.nettelton@enron.com | Re: EOL Approvals: 05-30-01 Speedy Gonzalez retains his title!
Marcus Nettelton@ENRON
05/30/2001 05:32 PM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: EOL Approvals: 05-30-01
Engage Energy America LLC - Buy only until demonstrate have power marketer's
licence.
Engage Energy Canada LP - Decline physical power unless can demonstrate
physical business activity in US.
Otherwise Ditto Credit.
Tana Jones@ECT
05/30/2001 05:23 PM
To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marcus
Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Robbi Rossi/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jane
McBride/AP/Enron@Enron, Andrea Calo/SA/Enron@Enron, Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: EOL Approvals: 05-30-01
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 05/30/2001 05:23 PM -----
Tom Moran/ENRON@enronXgate
05/30/2001 03:29 PM
To: Karen Lambert/ENRON@enronXgate, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/ENRON@enronXgate, Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate, Debbie R
Brackett/ENRON@enronXgate, Cynthia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, Enron Europe
Global CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Claudia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, William S
Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa Lees/ENRON@enronXgate, Juana
Fayett/ENRON@enronXgate, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang
Le/ENRON@enronXgate, Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim
Davies/LON/ECT@ECT, Karen O'Day/ENRON@enronXgate, Tanya
Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kelly Lombardi/ENRON@enronXgate, Brian
Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, EOL Call Center@ECT, Bill
D Hare/ENRON@enronXgate, Amy Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Molly LaFuze/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Danny
Clark/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Stephanie
Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Teresa Mandola/ENRON@enronXgate, Bill
Kyle/ENRON@enronXgate, Amber Ebow/ENRON@enronXgate, Thu Pham
Arnold/ENRON@enronXgate, Tandra Coleman/ENRON@enronXgate, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Wendi Lebrocq/ENRON@enronXgate, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: EOL Approvals: 05-30-01
Please see attached
Regards,
Tom Moran
713-853-3017 |
guzman-m/_sent_mail/173. | 312982.1075840741071.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Thu, 16 Nov 2000 15:37:00 -0800 (PST) | mark.guzman@enron.com | chartman@nbsrealtors.com | Re: Turkey Day Football I will be in LA folio. Sorry |
delainey-d/sent/851. | 21639105.1075854535723.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Thu, 21 Dec 2000 04:14:00 -0800 (PST) | david.delainey@enron.com | jeff.skilling@enron.com, mark.frevert@enron.com | Industry Canada - Competition Investigation FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 12/21/2000
12:13 PM ---------------------------
Sharon Crawford
12/21/2000 12:15 PM
To: IT Calgary
cc: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Rob
Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT
Subject: Industry Canada - Competition Investigation
To Everyone in the Calgary and Toronto offices (from Peter Keohane):
As you know from the numerous press stories and my earlier e-mail messages,
the Competition Bureau conducted an investigation into the activities of
Enron Canada Corp. and British Columbia Power Exchange Corporation regarding
transactions in the Alberta Power Pool. As you know, we were co-operating to
the fullest extent possible with the investigating authorities, and we were
confident that there was no substance to the allegations. Accordingly, it is
with great pleasure that I inform all of you that the Competition Bureau has
announced in a press release, that the alleged offences under the Competition
Act were unsubstantiated and that the Competition Bureau has closed the
inquiry. To quote the Competition Bureau, "The evidence suggests that the
companies were employing independent business strategies and were not
colluding on bids." I want to thank everyone for their co-operation in
dealing with this disruptive matter.
Regards,
Peter |
hain-m/all_documents/658. | 19141715.1075860361157.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Wed, 21 Mar 2001 03:25:00 -0800 (PST) | jeff.shields@enron.com | mary.hain@enron.com | FW: Small scale generation I would like to keep you informed on the issue of small generation
interconnection to the BPA transmission network. I am trying to find sites to
locate some mobile generators that Enron has available. There are several
Public Power utilities (BPA customers) in the Region that are interested in
having these units located in their service areas. My understanding is that
BPA is requiring small generators to go through an interconnect process if
they want to sell the power on the market. But, if the utility owns the
generation, or if the utilities industrial customer owns it, and they are
displacing BPA power then they don't have to go through this interconnection
process. That seems to me like self-dealing in that BPA's Power Business
Line gets the benefit of this load that the Transmission Business Line is
allowing to slip in, but other marketers, such as Enron, has to play by
different rules if we want to have access to this power.
I have a meeting Thursday with one of BPA's VP's in theTransmission Business
Line to talk about this issue. I will send you other email and correspondence
I receive on this. At some point Enron may want to take a stand on BPA's
activity if they are not going to be cooperative with our efforts.
Jeff
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Shields/PDX/ECT on 03/21/2001 11:14
AM ---------------------------
"Paschke, Al - TM" <afpaschke@bpa.gov> on 03/21/2001 10:18:31 AM
To: "'Jeff.Shields@enron.com'" <Jeff.Shields@enron.com>
cc: "Bennett, Ruth - TM-DITT1" <rbbennett@bpa.gov>, "Peterson, Edward A -
TOC-DITT2" <eapeterson@bpa.gov>
Subject: FW: Small scale generation
Jeff--Thanks for your e-mail. I have responded to your questions below. My
responses are in BOLDFACE. Also, please note that I am sending to you two
relevant documents via separate e-mail. These documents are noted in my
response to your first question below.
As I mentioned in the voice mail that I left with you this morning, you may
want to come in and talk to us concerning your plans. Engineering staff
would be available to discuss BPA-TBL's interconnection requirements. Take
care.
Al Paschke
(360)418-8283
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Shields@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Shields@enron.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2001 3:58 PM
To: rbbennett@bpa.gov; Alburns@bpa.gov
Subject: Small scale generation
I realize you are not permitted to talk directly with each other about this
subject, but I find myself in the middle of this policy issue and need
clarity on how to respond to requests I have received from customers in the
past few weeks. At issue is how to connect new "small scale" generation in
order to get generation on-line as quickly as possible. If we set aside
local and state permit requirements for the sake of this conversation, I
would like to ask about the process for working with Public Power
utilities, or their end-use consumers that have expressed an interest in
installing small-scale generation with the idea of selling the output to
Enron.
I have access to several turbine technologies ranging in size from 75 kW to
as large as 22 MW. These units are available in the next 4-20 weeks. I have
been contacted by various BPA utility customers, or in two cases,
industrial customers served by Public Power utilities that would like to
have Enron install these units at their facilities. The basic idea is that
Enron would install units and operate them and sell the out-put. The host
end-user and/or host utility will be paid a fee in return for supporting
this installation. In some instances the host would own the generation
asset and Enron would have a toll, in other instances Enron may own the
asset.
Questions that I have include:
What is the process for interconnection with BPA's transmission system? SEE
THE DRAFT DOCUMENT ENTITLED, "BPA TRANMSISSION BUSINESS LINE PROCESS FOR
SMALL GENERATION INERCONNECTIONS WITH UTILITY SYSTEMS WITHIN THE BPA LOAD
CONTROL AREA." ALSO, SEE THE DRAFT DOCUMENT ENTITLED, "BPA TRANSMISSION
BUSINESS LINE PRELIMINARY QUESTIONS FOR SMALL GENERATION INTERCONNECTIONS
LESS THAN 50 MW." I AM SENDING COPIES OF THESE DOCUMENTS TO YOU VIA
SEPARATE E-MAIL.
Is a traditional interconnection request necessary? YES.
If the host utility effectively takes this energy to load and virtually
consumers all of the power can Enron pay BPA a transmission few as though
the power were delivered over the federal transmission system? TO THE EXTENT
THAT POWER IS TO MOVE OVER THE FEDERAL TRANSMISSION SYSTEM, TRANSMISSION AND
ANCILLARY SERVICES MUST BE ACQUIRED FROM BPA-TBL. (UNDER SOME
CIRCUMSTANCES, CERTAIN ANCILLARY SERVICES CAN BE SELF OR THIRD
PARTY-PROVIDED.) TO THE EXTENT THAT THE PROJECT WOULD BE INTERCONNECTED
WITH THE SYSTEM OF ONE OF BPA'S REQUIREMENTS CUSTOMERS, (WHO PURCHASES NT
TRANSMISSION SERVICE)AND THE POWER SERVES THAT CUSTOMER'S LOAD REQUIREMENTS,
THE CUSTOMER IS OBLIGATED TO PURCHASE TRANSMISSION AND ANCILLARY SERVICES
ASSOCIATED WITH SUCH LOAD REQUIREMENTS. THE CUSTOMER IN BPA'S CONTROL AREA
WOULD HAVE TO ENTER INTO ARRANGEMENTS WITH BPA-TBL FOR METERING, ET AL.
Would this power have to be sold in the Northwest? NO.
Is BPA interested in a 3-5 yr toll on these smaller generation
technologies? IF YOU ARE ASKING WHETHER BPA WOULD BE INTERESTED IN
PURCHASING SUCH GENERATION FOR A PERIOD OF 3-5 YEARS, YOU SHOULD DISCUSS
THIS WITH BPA'S POWER BUSINESS LINE. OTHERWISE, PLEASE CLARIFY YOUR
QUESTION. THANKS.
I have had conversations with Scott Wilson about tolls on larger production
units and advised Scott that Enron has these smaller units available. I
expect to talk with him further this week about siting a 22 MW natural-gas
fired generator in the region. The tricky part is understanding how we get
the power to BPA and/or the market within the rules for interconnection
with the Federal Transmission System. Any help that you can offer on
expediting this process would be greatly appreciated.
I am sure there are more questions and I suspect you will have some as
well. Please feel free to contact me.
Jeff |
campbell-l/discussion_threads/589. | 7996626.1075857858907.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Thu, 10 Aug 2000 03:50:00 -0700 (PDT) | larry.campbell@enron.com | ckramer2@csc.com | LILCO Demand charge for July: .60
The swing rate will be on the July invoice which is scheduled to go out,
along with June, in about 2 weeks.
May's invoice should go out next week. |
dasovich-j/deleted_items/1844. | 11965030.1075861475478.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Tue, 4 Sep 2001 09:51:14 -0700 (PDT) | britt.whitman@enron.com | david.delainey@enron.com, louise.kitchen@enron.com, john.lavorato@enron.com | CALIFORNIA UPDATE - 9/4/2001 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
? Several procedural scenarios that might play out regarding the Edison MOU.
? A snapshot analysis of the political dynamics that affect the outcome.
Procedural Scenarios
Assembly
The Assembly Appropriations Committee's plan to take up SB 78XX today will likely be a pro forma hearing moving the bill forward to the full Assembly on a party line vote. While the controversial land easements amendments had been removed as of Friday's draft bill, it is rumored that the amendments may have returned over the weekend. If the problematic "Shaver Lake" provisions are removed from the bill, Assembly members may not hear much vocal public opposition from their constituents about rejecting the bill (although consumer groups are opposed and are trying to generate grass roots opposition). If the Shaver Lake amendments remain, several Central Valley legislators may oppose the plan in committee.
Assembly Speaker Bob Hertzberg supports this Edison deal, and the business community supports some recent amendments. This likely mitigates concerns from other pro-business Democrats. With or without the Shaver Lake provisions, Hertzberg should get at least 41 Democratic members (and probably a few more), but no more than 2 Republicans (if any) to vote Aye on the bill. Hertzberg has more than enough votes to spare from his caucus - he needs 41 votes for the bill to pass, and there are 50 Democrats in his caucus. If the vote is close, a personal plea from him and/or the Governor should enable him to get to 41.
Senate
The bill would next move to the Senate for approval of the Assembly's amendments. This is where the prognosticating gets difficult. Senate President pro Tem John Burton has said he does not support any amendments to SB 78xx. Gov. Davis and Speaker Hertzberg will likely meet several times with Burton to try to cut a deal, but relations between Davis and Burton are currently frayed (due to a variety of factors), and Burton is not one to back down from a position unless there is something in it for him to change his position.
This would lead to one of four scenarios:
? Burton refuses to have the bill heard in the Senate, and no Edison MOU bill is approved before Sept. 15th,
? Burton agrees to let the bill be heard despite his opposition (this option is unlikely),
? Burton comes to a deal with Davis and Hertzberg and brings the bill (as it is passed by the Assembly) for a vote in the full Senate with his support,
? Burton comes to a deal with Davis and Hertzberg, but as part of the deal, he insists on changes in the bill - thereby sending it back to the Assembly for more amendments, and another vote in the Assembly - before a vote in the Senate.
John Burton is considered one of the smartest, and certainly the cleverest politician in California state government today, so it is problematic to guess his next move. Additionally, external factors play into the determination of which of these options will result. For instance, the Governor may be willing to cut a deal with Burton on an unrelated issue that Burton cares more about resolving his way (e.g. workers compensation benefits, drug courts, reapportionment). Foretelling what will happen in the Senate is extremely difficult. But Davis and Hertzberg will try to cut a deal with him, and given Burton's past actions, he may string them along, holding out for several days (maybe even until Sept. 14th) before he agrees to anything.
Governor
Assuming the bill escapes the Senate (and more deals may need to be cut to get enough votes) the Governor will almost certainly sign it, regardless of Edison's public position. The bill will go into effect 90 days after the Governor signs it.
Consumer groups have vowed to undo any "Edison bailout" enacted into law by way of the ballot box. That could be either (1) an initiative to pass another bill overturning SB 78xx and replacing it with other provisions, or (2) a referendum to repeal SB 78xx, making it as if the bill was never passed at all.
Initiative
Once drafted and submitted to the Attorney General, it takes 15 days to receive an official title and summary, and another 25 days if the AG determines that a fiscal estimate is necessary. After either the 15 or 40 days, the Attorney General sends it to the proponents, the Senate, the Assembly, and the Secretary of State. The day it is mailed is called the Summary Date. That is the day upon which all calculations are made.
The proponents are allowed a maximum of 150 days to circulate petitions and collect signatures. However, the initiative measure must qualify at least 131 days before the statewide election in which it is to be submitted to the voters. Therefore it is past the deadline to qualify for the next statewide election, on March 5, 2002 (statewide primaries), and so, could not qualify until the statewide general election on November 5, 2002. However the window is tight for that election, as well, and a proposal would need to be submitted to the Attorney General by the end of September 2001 to qualify for November 2002.
The legislature may conduct public hearings on the proposed initiative, but cannot amend it. So whatever is submitted is what goes on the ballot. An initiative requires the gathering of signatures equal to five percent of the total votes cast for Governor in the preceding gubernatorial election (419,260 signatures). The ability to collect signature is heavily dependent on the amount of money the proponents have to pay signature gatherers. It seems unlikely that the consumer groups will be able to raise that kind of money quickly, but Harvey Rosenfield of the Foundation for Taxpayer & Consumer Rights has been successful at placing pro-consumer initiatives on the ballot before, including Prop. 9 in 1998, which sought to undo AB 1890 before the public understood its ramifications.
Referendum
Referenda on the ballot are fairly rare in comparison to initiatives, although a successful referendum was on the March 7, 2000 ballot. Prior to that, the last four questions placed before the voters appeared on the June 1982 primary election ballot. All four were defeated. Since 1912, there have been approximately 50 attempts to qualify referenda for the ballot. Of the 50 attempts, 39 qualified for the ballot, 26 of which prevented legislative statutes from taking effect. The circulation calendar, verification, timing, and the form of petition have different requirements than initiatives. For example, the California Constitution requires that the process must be completed within ninety days of the enactment of the bill that is being referred. The signature requirements are the same for a referendum as an initiative statute, though.
Political Dynamics
Notwithstanding the Governor's and Assembly Speaker's desire to enact an Edison rescue package, Senate President pro tem John Burton is in the driver's seat. In fact, as noted above, there is a perception among some that it is the Governor who needs Burton and not the other way around. One business source close to the negotiations believes Burton is not inclined to ask his members to make a second vote for an Edison bailout. In fact, members of both houses are worried about being perceived as bailing out the hobbled utility, their reluctance fed by generators' lobbyists who are sharing survey data that indicates voters blame the utilities for the energy mess and oppose any bailout.
Currently, due largely to this dynamic and others such as the Shaver Lake issue, there are not 41 votes for an Edison rescue in the Assembly. We believe this will change as the Governor and the Speaker exert their influence, and the bill will pass the Assembly. As difficult as it is to make predictions regarding the Assembly, the state Senate presents an even larger challenge. However, at this point it is our opinion that the odds of an Edison rescue package being approved by the state Senate are less than 50 percent. |
bass-e/discussion_threads/149. | 2149245.1075854623962.JavaMail.evans@thyme | Wed, 26 Apr 2000 09:47:00 -0700 (PDT) | eric.bass@enron.com | shusser@enron.com | Fw: Corruption Test i bet you score over 200!
---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 04/26/2000 04:46 PM
---------------------------
Matthew Lenhart
04/26/2000 04:39 PM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fw: Corruption Test
---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 04/26/2000
04:39 PM ---------------------------
Shirley Elliott <shelliott@dttus.com> on 04/26/2000 08:03:31 AM
To: kmcgallion@king-ranch.com, Terri@EDIarchitecture.com,
jjohnson@daewoous.com, j.cruthis@mail.utexas.edu, hallieklassen@usa.net,
Matt@TriangleTechnology.com, ryane@ideas.tocquigny.com,
sclarkson@tractebelpowerinc.com, lloyd.pope@bus.utexas.edu,
Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com, michelelefever@yahoo.com, rmoser@emjmetals.com,
Allison Damon <adamon@dttus.com>, Josh Sherman <jsherman@dttus.com>, Maria
Vigil <mvigil@dttus.com>
cc:
Subject: Fw: Corruption Test
I think we've all seen a different version of this.
______________________________ Forward Header
__________________________________
Subject: Fw: Corruption Test
Author: scody@acplasticsinc.com at Internet-USA
Date: 4/26/2000 8:00 AM
E-mail me back and let me know what you scored.
- CORRUPTI.EXE
- RFC-822.TXT
---------------------------- Forwarded with Changes
---------------------------
From: scody@acplasticsinc.com at Internet-USA
Date: 4/26/00 8:00AM -0500
To: Shirley Elliott at DTT.US.HOUSTON
*To: mjmyers@wt.net at Internet-USA
*To: matt_devine@standardandpoors.com at Internet-USA
*To: SABLICA@COMPUSERVE.COM at Internet-USA
*To: GATMAN@acplasticsinc.com at Internet-USA
*To: ashcrof@hs.utc.com at Internet-USA
*To: WALDRON50@YAHOO.COM at Internet-USA
*To: elvindarden@hotmail.com at Internet-USA
*To: deven.l.williams@us.arthurandersen.com at Internet-USA
Subject: Fw: Corruption Test
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- |