Datasets:

humane-lab

/

AVeriTeC-HerO

like 0

Follow

HUMANE Lab 7

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Ghislaine Maxwell tested positive for Covid-19 in jail.\n\nQ1: Who is Ghislaine Maxwell?\nA1: Ghislaine Maxwell was, according to her accusers, Jeffrey Epstein’s protector and procurer, his girlfriend and his madam. She was, by all accounts, a soul mate and a mirror image. He grew up in Brooklyn with no money to speak of and never finished college. She is Paris-born, Oxford-educated, a jet-setter who partied with princes and billionaires.\n\nTogether, Epstein and Maxwell allegedly built what prosecutors, police and a growing number of women described as a sex-trafficking operation that crisscrossed the nation to provide Epstein with three young girls a day.\n\nQ2: Where did the article stating that Ghislaine Maxwell has tested positive for Covid-19 in jail occur?\nA2: The Brown Valley Observer\n\nQ3: Is the Brown Valley Observer a satirical news source?\nA3: Yes, because This is an entertainment website written to satirize news events, politics, and popular faces and ideas, and to provide commentary on social attitudes and trends.\nWhile familiar names of celebrities and other media figures as well as familiar agencies and organizations are used, all news stories contained within are fictional in nature. Most of the words and actions attributed to these figures are created entirely by the author, who has tiny, feminine hands, and who was once friend-zoned by his own sister.\nThe purpose of this site is to entertain. Failing that, we’ll settle for “bother” or “annoy”. We’re not a particularly proud publication.\nPlease do not attempt anything described in any of these articles, except under strict hip-hop supervision.\nSimilarities between events published here and any actual events involving pretty much anyone would really be a shame.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: The answers show that the claim was featured on a satirical website and is not true so the claim is refuted.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Taylor Swift says we should remove the Statue of Liberty.\n\nQ1: Where is the quote sourced from?\nA1: It looks like it is from a Brazilian site called g1.globo.com\n\nQ2: Is there anything suspicious about the screenshot?\nA2: Yes, because The screenshot looks to be from a Brazilian site which only publishes in Portuguese but the screenshot is in English\n\nQ3: What did Taylor Swift say regarding monuments and was she referring to the Statue of Liberty?\nA3: \"As a Tennessean, it makes me sick that there are monuments standing in our state that celebrate racist historical figures who did evil things. Edward Carmack and Nathan Bedford Forrest were DESPICABLE figures in our state history and should be treated as such.\" Taylor Swift's original quote referred to Confederate monuments in Tennessee and in no way referenced the Statue of Liberty.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: Taylor Swift stated she would remove confederate statues that represented \"racist historical figures who did evil things\" and in no way mentioned the Statue of Liberty\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: COVID Outbreak Discovered in Oregon Minks\n\nQ1: Can Mink contract Covid_19?\nA1: Minks were infected following exposure from infected humans. Minks can act as a reservoir of SARS-CoV-2, passing the virus between them, and pose a risk for virus spill-over from mink to humans. People can then transmit this virus within the human population. Additionally, spill-back (human to mink transmission) can occur. It remains a concern when any animal virus spills in to the human population, or when an animal population could contribute to amplifying and spreading a virus affecting humans. As viruses move between human and animal populations, genetic modifications in the virus can occur. These changes can be identified through whole genome sequencing, and when found, experiments can study the possible implications of these changes on the disease in humans.\n\nQ2: Are minks susceptible to covid_19 ?\nA2: ink are highly susceptible to SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. Pair this fact with the crowded, filthy conditions on fur farms, and a disastrous and deadly public health situation is inevitable.\n\nQ3: Was COVID Outbreak Discovered in Oregon Minks?A\nA3: Mink on fur farms in Michigan, Oregon, Utah, and Wisconsin have tested positive for COVID-19. Research now shows that infected mink may contract the virus from humans and can transmit SARS-CoV-2 back to humans. This cycle has led to the development of mutated strains of the virus. Wild mink have also tested positive for COVID-19 in Utah.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: Minks tested positive for covid-19 \n\nverdict: 'Supported'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: The Philippines, during the Marcos dictatorship, developed a missile system before China did.\n\nQ1: When did the Philippines develop a missile system?\nA1: December 1972.\n\nQ2: When did China develop a missile system?\nA2: China's strategic nuclear force, referred to as the Second Artillery Corps, was established in Beijing on 1 July 1966", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: China developed a missile system before The Philippines, so the claim is refuted. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Tint Tint Htun, a former Myanmar actress and singer who became a Buddhist nun, has died.\n\nQ1: Is Tint Tint Htun still alive?\nA1: News outlets covering the story such as Mizzima suggest that she is not dead and that various sources back this up such as other singers proclaim she is still alive and well, the original poster who made a claim that they died deleted their post.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: the question-answer pairs refute the claim and are supported by the sources.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Congress-led government closed Rafale deal in 2012.\n\nQ1: What is the Rafale deal?\nA1: The Rafale deal was a deal made between the Indian Government and Dassault Aviationa, a French aircraft manufacturer, regarding the purchase of 36 Rafale fighter jets.\n\nQ2: What government was in power in India in 2012?\nA2: A congress led government.\n\nQ3: Did the Indian Congress-led government of 2012 close the Rafale deal?\nA3: The Rafale jets were chosen in 2012 during the UPA II tenure over aircraft offers from United States, Russia and Europe. The original plan was to buy 18 off-the-shelf jets from Dassault and 108 others would be put together by India’s Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL), located in Bengaluru, to boost the Make-In-India initiative.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: The source link confirms that the Rafale deal was transacted in 2012, as per claim.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Russia offered bounties to the Taliban to kill U.S. troops in Afghanistan.\n\nQ1: Has the US had any intelligence that Russia is offering bounties for the killing of US troops in Afghanistan?\nA1: Yes, because Leading Republican lawmakers on Monday confirmed that U.S. intelligence agencies have developed information about a Russian military operation targeting U.S. and allied forces in Afghanistan. But they said that any U.S. response should wait until intelligence agencies fully review the material, some of which was shared with members of Congress in a classified briefing at the White House.\nCurrent and former intelligence officials familiar with the intelligence said it was less ambiguous than White House officials and some lawmakers have portrayed and indicated that Russian military intelligence had offered bounties to Taliban-linked militants who killed U.S. military personnel.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: Questions and answers establish that the claim appears to be supported the US intelligence agencies have information about Russian mioitary operation targeting US forces.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: The South Sudan government has teamed up with the world bank to offer grants worth 41.4$ million to entrepreneurs\n\nQ1: Has the South Sudan government announced that they are teaming up with World Bank to offer grants to entrepreneurs?\nA1: No, because South Sudan's ministry of Finance and Planning have disputed this claim.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: Right claim\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: John Mahama presided over higher inflation. Nana Akufo-Addo has reduced inflation.\n\nQ1: What was the average inflation rate for Former president John Mahama?\nA1: 2013 = 11.66%\n2014 = 15.48%\n2015 = 17.14%\n\nAverage: 14.76%\n\nQ2: What was the average inflation rate for President Nana Akufo-Addo?\nA2: 2017 = 12.37%\n2018 = 7.8%\n2019 = 7.17%\n\nAverage: 9.11%", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: From the numbers it seems like the claim is true therefore it is supported\n\nverdict: 'Supported'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: John Mahama presided over a decline in Ghana's agriculture. Nana Akufo-Addo increased Ghana's agricultural output.\n\nQ1: What was Ghana's average agriculture growth rate under the former President John Mahama's administration between 2013 and 2015?\nA1: 2013 = 5.7\n2014 = 0.9\n2015 = 2.3\n\nAverage = 2.96\n\nQ2: What was Ghana's average agriculture growth rate under President Nana Akufo-Addo administration between 2017 and 2019?\nA2: 2017 = 6.1\n2018 = 4.8\n2019 = 4.6\n\nAverage = 5.16\n\nQ3: What was the value of Ghana's exports of food items to neighbouring countries in 2017?\nA3: 85,000 MT\n\nQ4: What was the value of Ghana's exports of food items to neighbouring countries in 2019?\nA4: 133,145 MT", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: Increase of 2.20%\n\nverdict: 'Supported'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Uttar Pradesh Police, in India, took several goats into custody for not wearing masks.\n\nQ1: Why did a farmer put on masks on goats\nA1: A Telangana man has started tying masks around the muzzles of his goats after a tiger tested positive for the novel coronavirus disease in New York\n\nQ2: Where was this incident of goats wearing masks reported\nA2: Telangana", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: No such incident reported\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Republican bill says no medical malpractice suits until 2024.\n\nQ1: Does the bill prohibit the filing of medical malpractice lawsuits?\nA1: No, because Law experts said via email interview that there were provisions in the bill that could reduce the number of suits filed, including a standard for negligence that’s higher than what state laws commonly require.\nhowever the email is not linked. But the bill itself in the source implies this.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: Bill changed the standard for negligence but did not remove it all together.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: The New York state Labor Department is giving essential workers $4,800 in hazard pay.\n\nQ1: What is US hazard pay?\nA1: Hazardous Duty Differential is additional compensation paid to employees who are exposed to high-risk working conditions in certain agency/facility locations for which they are not otherwise compensated\n\nQ2: Where have requests for hazard pay been reported?\nA2: Some New York residents and fellows want hazard pay, more support.\n\nBy Mark Chiusano\nMark.Chiusano@newsday.commjchiusano\nApril 15, 2020\n\nQ3: What happens when the link on the social posts with the claim that The New York state Labor Department is giving essential workers $4,800 in hazard pay is activated?\nA3: A picture of a gorilla giving the camera a finger is received.\n\nQ4: How does the US Dept of Labor define hazard pay?\nA4: The U.S. Department of Labor defines hazardous work as “[w]ork duty that causes extreme physical discomfort and distress which is not adequately alleviated by protective devices [and] is deemed to impose a physical hardship.”[Hazard pay is also forward looking pay that provides additional compensation in advance to mitigate the impacts of potential future harm.\n\nQ5: What authority is responsible for authorising hazard pay?\nA5: The U.S. Department of Labor does not currently regulate hazard pay and does not require that employers provide hazard pay. An employee is only entitled to hazard pay either through an employment agreement, or in specific instances, where provided by statute.\n\nQ6: Who typically receives hazard pay?\nA6: Federal statutes establish hazard pay for government employees whose duty involves “unusual physical hardship or hazard, and for any hardship or hazard related to asbestos” in an amount not to exceed 25 percent of the employee’s basic pay. However, in order to be entitled to the hazard pay incentive, the employee’s work must not be “in a position the classification of which takes into account the degree of physical hardship or hazard involved in the performance of the duties.” Workers whose positions are already known to be hazardous would not receive additional hazard pay. The hazard entitling a federal worker to additional compensation must therefore be outside the hazards normally encompassed by the worker’s job description.\n\nQ7: Did the parameters change during the COVID-19 pandemic?\nA7: With respect to COVID-19, federal employees whose job it is to work with deadly infectious diseases on a regular basis would likely not receive hazard pay under the statute.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: The New York state Labor Department is not in charge of giving hazard pay \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Actor Sonu Sood launched a toll-free number on May 26 to facilitate migrants to reach their home. Through this toll-free number, one can easily reach out to Sonu Sood’s team for help.\n\nQ1: Has Sonu Sood launched a toll-free number to facilitate migrants to reach their home ?\nA1: Yes, because Actor Sonu Sood said he has launched a toll free number to facilitate migrants to reach their home.\nMoved by the plight of troubled migrants walking several miles without food and water to reach their home, Sood facilitated several buses for workers stuck in the city due to the nationwide lockdown.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: The answer states that Sonu Sood has said he has launched a toll free number to facilitate migrants to reach their home. The answer then says that Sood facilitated several buses for workers stuck in the city, so showing that he is helping migrant workers return home.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Hetero is selling 6 vials of Remdesivir at Rs 32,400 at Kukatpally\n\nQ1: What is Remdesivir?\nA1: A vial of remdesivir, an antiviral that has broad-spectrum activity, meaning it works against more than one type of virus. Remdesivir has been authorized for emergency use in the COVID-19 pandemic; it also was used to fight Ebola when there were few treatments available.\n\nQ2: Is Kukatpally selling vials of Remdesivir?\nA2: True, Hetero is selling 6 vials of Remdesivir at Rs 32,400 at Kukatpally.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: The second question confirms that Hetero is selling these vials at Rs 32,400\n\nverdict: 'Supported'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: John Mahama presided over low industrial growth during his four years in office. Nana Akufo-Addo has increased industrial growth.\n\nQ1: What was the average industry growth rate under President John Mahama?\nA1: 2013 5.7%\n2014 0.9%\n2015 2.3%\n\nAverage 2.96%\n\nQ2: What was the average industry growth rate under President Nana Akufo-Addo?\nA2: 2017 6.1%\n2018 4.8%\n2019 4.6%\n\nAverage 5.16%", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: This claim is supported. According to the QA pairs, President John Mahama recorded industrial growth numbers of; 5.7% in 2013, 0.9% in 2014 and 2.3% in 2015. Whereas President Nana Akufo-Addo has recorded industrial growth numbers of; 6.1% in 2017, 4.8% in 2018 and 4.6% in 2019. These numbers show an increase in industrial growth. Therefore, this claim is supported.\n\n\nverdict: 'Supported'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Reports as recent as 2017 reported 92% prevalence of blood lead poisoning in children from some villages in the Nigerian state of Zamfara.\n\nQ1: Was there high level of child lead poisoning in Zamfara State Nigeria 2017 ?\nA1: The World Health Organization (WHO), which has been assisting the Government in managing the situation, called for Nigerian authorities to increase their commitment to combat lead poisoning by strengthening its capacity to diagnose, treat and manage it, as well as ensuring that all areas have been de-contaminated.\n\nIn a news release, WHO warned that lead poisoning cannot be successfully eliminated without significant changes to mining practices, including the relocation of ore processing activities and storage of ore materials away from villages.\n\nOther necessary measures recommended by WHO include the adoption of processing methods that produce less dust, and hygiene measures such as removing contaminated clothes and washing before returning home.\n\nLead poisoning damages the nervous system and causes brain and blood disorders. Treatment is time-consuming and expensive as it involves undergoing long-term therapy with chelating agents, which remove heavy metals from the body.\n\nTreatment also involves persuading people to adopt new practices and behaviours, something which requires an ongoing effort from authorities to continuously raise awareness and make sure the population follows preventive measures.\n\nAccording to WHO, children in seven villages in Zamfara state require chelation therapy. This is in addition to the residents of seven other villages who have already received treatment. In these villages the combined effects of removing children from lead exposure and providing chelation therapy caused the child mortality rate to drop from 43 per cent to 1 per cent in one year.\n\nSince the problem was discovered last year, $1.9 million has been provided by the UN Central Emergency Response Fund (CERF) to WHO and the UN Children’s Fund (UNICEF), which have been used to provide treatment, train doctors, provide quick diagnoses, and raise awareness about the hazards of lead.\n\nQ2: Was there a 92% prevalence of blood lead poisoning in Zamfara due to gold mining?\nA2: No answer could be found.\n\nQ3: What was the reason behind high levels of child lead poisoning in Zamfara State Nigeria?\nA3: Gold rush triggers deadly lead poisoning in Nigeria\n\nQ4: Where did this figure come from?\nA4: a 2013 study of 307 children below age six as the likely source of his claim. He said he may have mistaken this as being in 2017.\n\nThe study focused on a village in the Kawaye area of Anka local council in Zamfara. It recruited the children through random sampling to reduce bias. The researchers, who included the Ahmadu Bello University and the national and state health ministries, found a 92.5% prevalence of lead poisoning, the same proportion as Abdulsalam’s claim.\n\nQ5: How does this study define lead poisoning?\nA5: The study based its definition of childhood lead poisoning on US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, which give this as blood lead levels of 5 micrograms per deciliter or more. \n\nSome 34 of the children had elevated blood lead levels of up to 45 micrograms per deciliter.\n\nQ6: Do any other sources show similar results?\nA6: Other studies also show high child lead poisoning levels in the state. In 2010, a deadly lead poisoning outbreak was reported in some areas of Zamfara. The state holds many of the gold mining leases in Nigeria.\n\nIn two of the most affected villages, 25% of children under age five had died in the past year.\n\nQ7: What did studies of the children affected show?\nA7: In two of the most affected villages, 25% of children under age five had died in the past year. One of the first studies into the outbreak, done in mid-2010, found that as many as eight in 10 of them had convulsions before death.\n\nThe researchers tested 204 children below age 5 in the two villages. All had lead levels higher or equal to 10 micrograms per decilitre, with 97% of them having levels higher or equal to 45 micrograms per decilitre.\n\nQ8: How dangerous is lower levels of lead in the blood?\nA8: Even at low levels of 10 micrograms per deciliter or less, the immune, reproductive and cardiovascular systems of people are compromised by lead poisoning. In June 2010, a guideline value of an intake of 1 microgram per deciliter for lead was withdrawn after experts from the WHO and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations found it inadequate to protect against diminished intelligence. \n\nProf Udoh, the pharmacology and toxicology expert from the University of Calabar, agreed that based on this revised standard, the lead levels found in the blood of all the children tested during the 2010 study were harmful.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: Supported at 92.5% in QA Pair.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Tom Hanks went on on national TV to say he had COVID 19\n\nQ1: When was this claim made?\nA1: 28/07/2020\n\nQ2: Did Tom Hanks announce he had tested positive for Covid-19?\nA2: Yes, because On Instagram\n\nQ3: Was Tom Hanks treated for Covid-19?\nA3: Yes, because Actor Tom Hanks and his wife, Rita Wilson, have been released from an Australian hospital after being treated for the new coronavirus.\n\nThe couple left hospital and were in self-quarantine, son Chet Hanks said in a video message on his Instagram account.\n\nQ4: When did Tom Hanks return to the USA after having Covid-19?\nA4: March 2020\nActors Tom Hanks and Rita Wilson are back in the United States after recovering from the coronavirus in Australia.\n\nQ5: How did Hanks communicate his coronavirus status?\nA5: Hanks went public with his diagnosis in a tweet on March 11, (2020) telling the world that he and his wife, the actor and singer Rita Wilson, had both tested positive for the coronavirus.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: The Q&A's state he made it public on social media not tv as claimed.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: USA is largely out of Afghanistan.\n\nQ1: How many American troops were in Afghanistan in 2017?\nA1: July 6, 2016: Saying the security situation in Afghanistan “remains precarious,” Obama announces that instead of dropping the U.S. troop level to 5,500, he will keep it at about 8,400 through the end of his term on Jan. 20, 2017. He said his successor can determine the next move.\n\nQ2: How many American troops were in Afghanistan in July 2020 at the time of the claim?\nA2: On Monday, four-and-a-half months since the signing, chief U.S. negotiator and peace envoy Zalmay Khalilzad tweeted that “a key milestone in the implementation of the U.S.-Taliban agreement” had been reached as American troop numbers dropped to 8,600 from about 12,000 and five bases were closed in Afghanistan.\n\nQ3: During Trump's term, what were the maximum number of troops in afghanistan?\nA3: The number ballooned to around 14,000 at one point in Trump’s term. At the time of this claim There’s almost the same amount of U.S. troops in Afghanistan now as there were when Trump took office.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: Although American troop numbers dropped to 8,600 from about 12,000 and five bases were closed in Afghanistan. The numbers rose to around 14,000 at one point in Trump’s term. There’s almost the same amount of U.S. troops in Afghanistan now as there were when Trump took office.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Four Ukrainian soldiers died after taking part in Covid-19 vaccine trials conducted by USA.\n\nQ1: Is it true that four Ukrainian soldiers died after participating in American COVID-19 vaccine trials ?\nA1: The claim was published here on July 27, 2020, on an Australia-based anti-vaccination Facebook page with thousands of followers.\nThe claim is false; Ukraine military and Kharkiv medical officials said the posts were \"fake news\".\n\nQ2: Is it true that in Paris while Muslims prayed , the French sang their National Anthem in protest ?\nA2: On breaking the video into key-frames and performing a reverse image search using Yandex, we found news reports from November 2017. The reports stated that the incident is from the suburb of Clichy in Paris where local right-wing mayor Remi Muzeau led a march towards around 200 Muslim worshippers who were observing their Friday prayer outside in protest against the town's decision to close a prayer hall. A line of riot police separate the two groups and at one one point tensions appear ready to boil over reported The Local France on the incident on November 11, 2017. This claim is false.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: The answer states that the claim is fake news and the source shows at the bottom of the Facebook post a link to the post about the fake news. The claim is refuted.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Smartphone apps can measure blood pressure, heart rate and oxygen levels by asking you to press your index finger on the camera.\n\nQ1: Can Smartphone apps use the camera to measure blood pressure, heart rate and oxygen levels ?\nA1: There is no evidence that any smartphone technology is accurate for the measurement of blood oxygen saturation for clinical use. Furthermore, the scientific basis of such technologies is questionable. Oxygen saturation levels obtained from such technologies should not be trusted in the clinical assessment of patients.\n\nQ2: Can a Smartphone app measure blood pressure by asking you to press your index finger on the camera?\nA2: A team of Michigan State University scientists has created a new app and hardware for smartphones to measure blood pressure with accuracy that may rival arm-cuff devices.\n\nQ3: Can a Smartphone app measure heart rate by asking you to press your index finger on the camera?\nA3: Smartphone manufacturers offer mobile health monitoring technology to their customers, including apps using the built-in camera for heart rate assessment.\n\nQ4: Can a Smartphone app measure oxygen levels by asking you to press your index finger on the camera?\nA4: Although Samsung’s newest flagship phones have done away with this feature, older devices including the Galaxy S10 series are equipped with a sensor that can estimate the amount of oxygen in your blood, or peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2).\n\nQ5: Are smart phones accurate in estimating heart rate, oxygen levels and blood pressure?\nA5: Depending on the app, some are accurate, but others have found to provide different readings to more scientific equipment.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: There is no medical evidence that this method is effective, and there is a high risk that apps which claim to measure blood oxygen via fingerprints are designed only to gain access to secure data protected by fingerprint data technology as an alternative to user passwords.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Samajwadi Party leader Azam Khan had said he (water burial)would take jalsamadhi if he was not invited for the Bhumi Pujan of the Ram Temple in Ayodhya on August 5, 2020.\n\nQ1: What other prominent person has the name Azam Khan?\nA1: Azam Khan... is the president of Sri Ram Mandir Nirman Muslim Kar Sevak Manch.\n\nQ2: Did media reports describe which Azam Khan was quoted in the claim?\nA2: News 18 reported:\nAzam Khan, the national president of Muslim Karsevak Manch, reached Ayodhya and took a pledge. He says that if he is not invited to the Prime Minister's Bhoomi Pujan program on August 5, then he will take water samadhi in Saryu.... (Translated from Hindu to English by Google Translate).", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: The person mentioned in the claim was the wrong person according to the second answer so the claim is refuted.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: The United Nations delivered a formal stand down order to the Trump administration in July 2020, ordering the President to stop Federal officers from using non-lethal force against peaceful protesters in Portland.\n\nQ1: Was there a link in the claim supposedly showing that the UN ordered Trump to stand down ?\nA1: Yes, because There was a link to the UN News Website but mentioned no stand down.\n\nQ2: Is the UN allowed to intervene with its members internal disputes?\nA2: CHAPTER I: PURPOSES AND PRINCIPLES\nNothing contained in the present Charter shall authorize the United Nations to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state or shall require the Members to submit such matters to settlement under the present Charter; but this principle shall not prejudice the application of enforcement measures under Chapter Vll.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: They are not authorised to make such a request.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Too much exposure to 5G, can literally fry the human central nervous system.\n\nQ1: What is 5G?\nA1: It is the next generation mobile phone network and it promises much higher connection speeds, lower latency (response times) and to be more reliable than the creaking 4G networks we have now.\n\nQ2: Can exposure to the 5G signal be bad for health?\nA2: At this time, there has been very little research showing that the RF waves used in 5G networks are any more (or less) of a concern than the other RF wavelengths used in cellular communication.\n\nQ3: Can 5G signals penetrate the body?\nA3: The higher frequency waves used for 5G are less able to penetrate the body than lower frequency waves currently used, so in theory they might be less likely to have any potential health effects.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: There is no evidence that 5G is harmful to humans or fries the human central nervous system.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Nigeria recorded 1.25 million abortion cases in 2012 alone, but that this figure represented double the 1996 figures.\n\nQ1: How many abortions were carried out in Nigerian in 1996?\nA1: 610,000\n\nQ2: How many abortions were carried out in Nigerian in 2012?\nA2: 1.25 million", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: It seems from the 2nd QA that the figure is consistent with the numbers in the claim, therefore the label is supported\n\nverdict: 'Supported'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Your face will become exposed to the virus if you wear your mask on your chin.\n\nQ1: Will your face become exposed to the virus if you wear your mask on your chin?\nA1: Wearing a cloth face covering correctly can help prevent the spread of COVID19 to others.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: This claim is supported. According to the QA pair, by wearing your mask correctly it helps prevent the spread of COVID-19. Wearing your mask on your chin is not wearing it correctly. Therefore, this claim is supported.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Florida is doing over five times better” than New Jersey and New York in COVID-19 deaths per million people\n\nQ1: As of the time of this claim, how many deaths had Florida recorded in the prior 7 days?\nA1: As of July 30, Florida recorded 988 COVID-19 deaths in the previous seven days,\n\nQ2: How does this compare with New Jersey and New york/\nA2: 91 in New Jersey and 114 in New York, according to the New York Times.\n\nQ3: How do these numbers compare deaths during to peak covid rates?\nA3: On April 4, when the first wave of cases in New York peaked, the state had 237 deaths per 1 million population. Using July 16 as a peak in cases for Florida, the death rate was 223 deaths per million.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: It seems that at the time of the claim Florida was doing worse that new jersey, therefore the claim label is refuted\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: UNICEF stated that Coronavirus (COVID-19) is large in size where the cell diameter is 400-500 micro and for this reason any mask prevents its entry.\n\nQ1: How big is the SARS-CoV-2 virus?\nA1: Member viruses of the family Coronaviridae are enveloped, 80–220 nm in size\n\nQ2: Was this post from UNICEF?\nA2: No, because UNICEF does not issue coronavirus advisories on chat apps. We post updates and safety tips only on official verified UNICEF accounts and on the official website:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: The post was not made by UNICEF \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: 5G towers unleash severely damaging level of radiation to DNA\n\nQ1: Do the radio frequency waves from cell towers cause health problems?\nA1: At this time, there’s no strong evidence that exposure to RF waves from cell phone towers causes any noticeable health effects.\n\nQ2: What type of radiation do RF waves produce?\nA2: Like FM radio waves, microwaves, visible light, and heat, they are forms of non-ionizing radiation.\n\nQ3: Does non-ionizing radiation damage DNA?\nA3: They do not directly damage the DNA inside cells, which is how stronger (ionizing) types of radiation such as x-rays, gamma rays, and ultraviolet (UV) rays are thought to be able to cause cancer.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: Answers states no evidence and not known to cause DNA damage.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Those most susceptible to the radiation from 5G technology are fetuses in utero and children.\n\nQ1: Are children susceptible to the radiation from 5G technology?\nA1: Children have smaller heads than adults. Cell phones and wireless radiation can go deeper into their brains because children have a shorter distance from their skull to their brain center.\n\nQ2: Are fetuses in utero susceptible to the radiation from 5G technology?\nA2: Cell-phone use has rapidly increased during the last several decades (1). Cell phones generate radio-frequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF), resulting in local exposure of the human body to RF-EMF. Concerns have been raised regarding the potential effects of RF-EMF exposure on human health. Short-term exposure in adults is regarded as safe; however, potential health effects of long-term exposure and exposure of fetuses and children are not well studied (2, 3).\n\nThe interpretation of results from epidemiologic studies evaluating health effects of RF-EMF exposure from cell-phone use is challenging. Because of the technical evolution of mobile communication systems, similar levels of cell-phone use do not necessarily induce similar levels of RF-EMF exposure. Users’ exposure to RF-EMF from third-generation (3G) devices is much lower than that from second-generation (2G) devices (4). More recent technologies (4G/5G) also differ from 3G devices, though less, in terms of users’ exposure.\n\nQ3: Does the radiation from 5G towers damage dna?\nA3: Like FM radio waves, microwaves, visible light, and heat, they are forms of non-ionizing radiation. This means they do not directly damage the DNA inside cells, which is how stronger (ionizing)\n\nQ4: Is 5G dangerous to children?\nA4: Mobile signals in the UK are governed by exposure guidelines, and the consensus of reviews by independent public health authorities, including Public Health England, expert groups and the World Health Organization (WHO) is that these guidelines provide protection for all people (including children) against all established health hazards.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: Q&A 2 states that what is claimed 5G exposure of foetuses and children is not well studied. However Q&A 3 states the 5g tech uses non-ionising type radiation which is shown to not be dangerous to dna, Also Q&A 4 shows that the WHO says it is safe for children\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Due to their exterior anatomy, male testicles are especially susceptible to 5G radiation, which lowers sperm count. Just the same, cellular radiation kills off irreplaceable eggs in females.\n\nQ1: Does 5G radiation have any effect on men's health\nA1: According to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and expert studies, there’s nothing to suggest 5G mmWave is a significant health risk, but it’s clear there is more research to be done on the subject\n\nQ2: Is there a relationship between male fertility and 5G radiation\nA2: The relationship between the radiation emitted by cell phones and WiFi networks and the male reproductive tract is less clear.\n\nQ3: Does 5G radiation have any effect on men's health?\nA3: According to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and expert studies, there is nothing to suggest that the 5G mmWave is a significant health risk.\n\nQ4: Is there a relationship between male fertility and 5G radiation?\nA4: While many of the specifics of 5G remain ill-defined, it is known that 5G cell phones will use frequencies covered by the current FCC exposure guidelines (300 kHz-100 GHz), and the conclusions reached based on the current body of scientific evidence covers these frequencies.\n\nQ5: Is there a relationship between female fertility and 5G radiation?\nA5: While many of the specifics of 5G remain ill-defined, it is known that 5G cell phones will use frequencies covered by the current FCC exposure guidelines (300 kHz-100 GHz), and the conclusions reached based on the current body of scientific evidence covers these frequencies.\n\nQ6: According to the FDA, are there any new health implications surrounding 5G usage?\nA6: No, because FDA stated: No New implications for 5G\n\nQ7: What is the FDA responsible for in relation to the claim?\nA7: The FDA is responsible for, among other things, ensuring cell phones – and any radiation-emitting electronic product – are safe for the public to use. This includes, understanding the health risks (if any) of new electronic products that emit radiation as they become widely available to the U.S. public, such as 5G cell phones.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: There is no scientific research to support this claim so it is refuted.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: US healthcare workers still don't have enough PPE during the COVID-19 pandemic\n\nQ1: What is PPE to a health care worker?\nA1: Personal Protective Equipment is typically used in healthcare and lab settings, worn by workers to block infection by viruses and bacteria from bodily fluids.\n\nQ2: Is PPE regulated?\nA2: PPE is regulated by the FDA to ensure it is resistant to rips/tears and effectively blocks fluids.\n\nQ3: Which Health care workers must wear PPE?\nA3: Healthcare workers directly caring for people with COVID-19 must wear full PPE,\n\nQ4: What does PPE consist of?\nA4: PPE items include gowns/clothing, gloves, face shields or goggles, surgical masks and/or respirator masks.\n\nQ5: Did health care workers report a shortage of ppe in the U.S during the covid pandemic?\nA5: (NNU’s) second COVID-19 survey of U.S. nurses showed 87% of nurses who work at hospitals reported reusing at least one\npiece of single-use PPE. Reusing single-use PPE is a dangerous\npractice that can increase exposures to nurses, other staff, and\nto patients.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: Since single use items are being reused this indicates a shortage.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: APC is luring Abubakar Shekau with Vice Presidential ticket as an inducement to end Boko-Haram War.\n\nQ1: Is APC trying to lure out Abubakar Shekau with Vice Presidential ticket as an inducement to end Boko-Haram War?\nA1: Kabir Adamu Ada, the Managing Director of Beacon Consulting, a security and intelligence outfit told The ICIR that “it will be suicidal if that should happen and I do not think that will happen”.\n\nKabir further explained that Shekau is a globally wanted terrorist. He said, “the US has 7 million dollars bounty on his head and that is an internationally recognised bounty given the power of the US.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: It sees like the APC is not luring Abubakar Shekau with Vice Presidential ticket. Especially, seeing as Abubakar Shekau is a globally wanted terrorist. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: BLM injures 1000 police officers, kills36 people and does $8 billion in damage .\n\nQ1: Have there been news reports about how many people have been injured?\nA1: WASHINGTON — More than 700 law enforcement officers have been injured on the job during nationwide protests over the death of George Floyd — with nearly 300 of those among New York’s Finest, according to the Department of Justice and the NYPD.\n\nQ2: Is there any estimates of how much it has cost in damages?\nA2: Not an exact amount but estimates are made.\n\nPrior to 2020, the costliest civil disorder event in U.S. was the 1992 Los Angeles riots, according to PCS, the insurance industry's primary source for compiling and reporting insured losses resulting from catastrophes, from hurricanes to wildfires.\n\nThat five-day event caused about $1.4 billion in 2020 dollars, according to PCS. Two days of riots following the funeral of Freddie Gray caused $26 million in losses in Baltimore alone.\n\nProtests for police reform, racial injustice continue to spread across the USVideo\nBut losses stemming from the Floyd protests are likely to far exceed that. In Minneapolis, where some 400 businesses were damaged, owners and insurance experts estimate costs of the damage to exceed $500 million, according to the Minneapolis Star Tribune.\n\nQ3: How many people have died?\nA3: Though curfews are lifting and protests remain predominantly peaceful, the death toll from two weeks of demonstrations over the death of George Floyd continues to creep upward, with at least 19 people—a majority of whom are black—now dead.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: Only about 19 people have been confirmed dead as a result of the protests and about 700 police officers nationwide \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Ghanan government presented inconsistent data about the Free Senior High School programme in the 2020 Mid-year review budget.\n\nQ1: Where was the SHS (Senior High School programme) mentioned in the Ghanan government 2020 Mid-year review budget?\nA1: In pages 45 and 98.\n\nQ2: What is the common year/form of the SHS that was mentioned in pages 45 and 98 of the report?\nA2: Form 3 students.\n\nQ3: How many form 3 SHS students were mentioned in page 45?\nA3: 362,108\n\nQ4: How many form 3 SHS students were mentioned in page 98?\nA4: 313,837", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: Answer shows data from the report mentioned in the claim which states 362,108 students on page 45 and then 313,837 students on page 98 which confirms inconsistent data in the report the claim mentions.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Clint Eastwood endorsed Donald Trump.\n\nQ1: Did Clint Eastwood express support for Donald Trump ?\nA1: Longtime Republican Clint Eastwood is pulling support from Donald Trump in the 2020 election. In an interview with the Wall Street Journal, the actor-director signaled that he thinks a different candidate would be the better choice.\n\n“The best thing we could do is just get Mike Bloomberg in there,” he said.\n\nAfter endorsing Mitt Romney and famously delivering a speech at the 2012 Republican National Convention to an empty chair that represented Barack Obama, Eastwood never officially backed Trump. In a 2016 interview, he expressed displeasure with Trump and Hillary Clinton, saying there’s “much funny business on both sides of the aisle.”\n\nHe praised Trump at the time because he was “onto something” and “secretly everybody’s getting tired of political correctness, kissing up.”\n\n“We’re really in a p—y generation. Everybody’s walking on eggshells. We see people accusing people of being racist and all kinds of stuff. When I grew up, those things weren’t called racist,” he said.\n\nNow, he’s changed his tune a bit on Trump.\n\nWhile he approves of “certain things” the president has done, he wishes that he would act “in a more genteel way, without tweeting and calling people names. I would personally like for him to not bring himself to that level,” he said.\n\nEastwood also touched on the controversy surrounding Olivia Wilde’s character, Kathy Scruggs, in his 2019 film “Richard Jewell.” He showed Scruggs, the real-life reporter who alleged Jewell planted a bomb at the 1996 Olympics, sleeping with an FBI source to get information. Lawyers for the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, the newspaper at which Scruggs worked, called the portrayal “entirely false and malicious, and…extremely defamatory and damaging.” The film was Clintwood’s worst opening in 40 years.\n\nThe director defended his right to cinematic freedom and said the newspaper was trying to shroud its “guilt” over a “reckless story.”\n\n“Well, she hung out at a little bar in town, where mostly police officers went,” he said", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: From the answer it seems quite clear that Clint Eastwood might have supported Donald Trump before, but will now not continue doing so. Therefore the claim is refuted\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Wisconsin Democrats say lawmakers in neighbouring states have implemented more safety precautions against the spread of COVID-19 than state GOP.\n\nQ1: By July 24 2020 in the U.S state of Wisconsin had any safety rules for Covid 19 been implemented?\nA1: A July 24 2020 news release by the State Senate Democratic Committee it stated that, Joint Committee on Finance, Senator Darling has refused to use her position\nto protect the health and well-being of Wisconsinites, Despite COVID-19\ncases and deaths continuing to rise, Republicans have refused to enact any life saving\nprecautions.\n\nQ2: Had Wisconsin's enamouring states enacted any Covid 19 safety measures by July 24 2020?\nA2: A July 24 2020 news release from the State Senate Democratic Committee stated that, While neighbouring states\nlike Minnesota, Illinois and Michigan have already implemented safety precautions like\nrequiring individuals to wear masks, similar pleas in Wisconsin have fallen on deaf ears of\nRepublican legislators,", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: Neighbouring states have imposed higher safety precautions.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: The Covid-19 infection rate among healthcare workers in Ireland is the highest in the world.\n\nQ1: What was the rate of Covid-19 cases among healthcare workers in Ireland?\nA1: The INMO said that up to the end of 8 May, 8,018 cases of infection of healthcare workers were reported, with healthcare workers making up a third of all positive Covid-19 positive cases in Ireland.\n\nQ2: How many healthcare workers in other countries compared to the population had covid.?\nA2: In China, 3.8% were healthcare workers, while in some US states the figure reached 11%.\n\nQ3: Is it possible to compare different countries or do they record their cases in a different way ?\nA3: No answer could be found.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: The answers do not give me the info to support or refute the case. I would need to see the percentage in Ireland.\n\nverdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Jim Carrey said, 'Hollywood Elites Eat Whole Babies For Christmas' - 'The More They Suffer - The Better They Taste'\n\nQ1: Is there any record of Jim Carrey saying that Hollywood elite eat babies?\nA1: No answer could be found.\n\nQ2: Where was this claim first published?\nA2: The story was published in a blog post though they credited Newspunch for the story. Newspunch have removed the story now from their site.\n\nQ3: So is there any proof that Jim Carey said this remark?\nA3: News punch removed as it was considered outdated and inaccurate.,", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: There is no apparent record of Jim Carrey saying this, the article on the website Newspunch was also removed by themselves as it was considered outdated and inaccurate.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: US drug prices in 2019 went down for the first time in 51 years.\n\nQ1: During 2019 as the period referenced in the claim, what did official statistics report regarding price reduction for US consumer prescription drug prices?\nA1: The Bureau of Labor Statistics CPI for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) shows Prescription drugs in U.S. city average, all urban consumers, seasonally adjusted shows decreased year-over-year figures for several months in 2019. This was the longest sustained drop in the measure since the early 1970s.\n\nQ2: Prior to 2019 when were price reductions reported for US consumer prescription drugs?\nA2: The period of sustained year-over-year month drops in prescription drug prices began in December 2018, prior to 2019. Prior to 2019 year-over-year month price drops also include July 2013.\n\nQ3: Have Drug prices ever decreased in the the 51 years previous of the claim in the USA?\nA3: They have Decreased several times since the 70s as shown in the troughs and peaks of the source graph attached to this question.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: It's clear that drug prices have gone down several time in the last 51 years, with several peaks and falls. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: PM Modi has not imposed President’s rule even a single time since 2014.\n\nQ1: Is it true that PM Modi has never imposed President rule ?\nA1: The claim is False. President's rule has been imposed several times after 2014.\nIt has been imposed in following states -\nAndhra Pradesh: March 1, 2014 — June 2, 2014\nMaharashtra: September 28, 2014 — October 31, 2014\nJammu And Kashmir: January 9, 2015 — March 1, 2015\nDelhi: February 14, 2014 — February 13, 2015\n\nAnd many more times.\n\nQ2: What's meant by imposing president's rule?\nA2: According to Article 356 of the constitution, President’s rule can be imposed in a state “if a situation has arisen in which the government of the state cannot be carried on in accordance with the provisions of the constitution.\" \nTypically, president’s rule is imposed when a state government loses its majority or in the case of a split within the ruling party or withdrawal of support by a coalition partner. \nPresident’s rule also comes into effect in the event of a post-poll scenario, where no party or coalition is in a position to form a new government. There are also situations where a chief minister has tendered his resignation for various reasons like disqualification by the courts or in Arvind Kejriwal’s case, failing to pass the Jan Lok Pal bill in February 2014.\n\nQ3: Since when has been Narendra Modi the prime minister of India?\nA3: Since May 2014 till now.\n\nQ4: How many times was the president's rule applied during the rule of PM Modi?\nA4: 3 times.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: Q&A 1 shows President's rule has been imposed several times after 2014.and since Q&A 3 shows Modi has been in power since 2014 then this fully refutes the claim that he has never used the rule.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Counties in Kenya allocated an average of 7.3% of budgets to agriculture in 2019/20.\n\nQ1: How much of Kenya's budget has been allocated to agriculture in 2019/20?\nA1: No answer could be found.\n\nQ2: What is the growth rate for Agriculture in 2019 for Kenya?\nA2: 3.6%.\n\nQ3: In general terms how much of Kenya's budget goes into Agriculture?\nA3: Agriculture is only the third most prioritized beneficiaries of the budget receiving around 60-70 billion Kenyan Shillings.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: No question and answer pair addresses the claim. Question 3 determines the amount allocated in terms of money but not in terms of percentage. \n\nverdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: County governments in Kenya have continued to adhere to the two-thirds gender principle. Three counties of Kilifi, Nyeri and Migori have gone higher and have a 50/50 representation of male and female CECs (county executive committee members).\n\nQ1: In 2018/2019, did all of Kenya's county governments achieve the two-thirds gender principle that is detailed in the constitution?\nA1: According to the Kenyan National Statistics Office, 39 county cabinets had adhered to the gender principle. However some counties failed, including Kitui.\n\nQ2: Did the Kenyan county of Kitui adhere to the gender principle in 2018 and ensure that no more than two-thirds of the elective were of the same gender?\nA2: No they did not.\n\nQ3: What is Kenya's two-thirds gender rule?\nA3: Kenya’s constitution prescribes that “not more than two-thirds of the members of elective or appointive bodies shall be of the same gender”.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: Some counties did indeed adhere to the two-thirds gender principle but some did not. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Target ended its “Heroes & Helpers” program that pairs children with police officers for holiday shopping trips\n\nQ1: Did Target have a program called Heroes and Helpers?\nA1: Yes, because Heroes & Helpers events pair public safety officers with in-need youth for a day of holiday shopping in Target stores, helping them form strong relationships in the process. Local law enforcement select kids and families to participate.\n\nQ2: Was Targets Heroes and Helpers program still running in 2019?\nA2: Yes, because The scheme celebrated its tenth anniversary in 2019.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: there is no evidence that the program has been ended\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Kenya's sanitation coverage is now at 25%, up from 16%.\n\nQ1: What was Kenya's sanitation coverage in November 2019/2020?\nA1: No answer could be found.\n\nQ2: What was Kenya's sanitation coverage in 2018/19?\nA2: 17%", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: There is not enough evidence in the question and answer pairs to make a claim label. Therefore it is not enough evidence\n\nverdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Sanitation coverage in Kenya is now at 25%, from 16%.\n\nQ1: What does \"sanitation coverage\" mean in Kenya?\nA1: Sewered sanitation coverage refers to the number of people served with flush or pour-flush to\npiped sewer systems, as a percentage of the total population within the service area of the\nutility. It measures the performance of utilities with sewerage systems in delivering sanitation\nservices to consumers.\n\nQ2: What percentage of Kenya's population had sanitation in 2020?\nA2: No answer could be found.\n\nQ3: What percentage of Kenya's population had sanitation in 2019?\nA3: 17%", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: Additional QAs could be formulated.\nWhat do UNICEF and other funding authorities report about sanitation facilities in Kenya around time of the claim? Is there media reportage on sanitation status in Kenya around the time of the claim. \n\n\nverdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Federal High Court has restrained Godwin Obaseki, the incumbent Edo state governor, from participating in the Peoples’ Democratic Party’s gubernatorial primaries in the state.\n\nQ1: Did someone file a suit against Governor Godwin Obaseki from participating in the Edo People's Democratic Party's primary elections?\nA1: Ogbeide-ihama had filed a suit in the court asking it to prevent any member of the party that has purchased forms but not screened within the time stipulated to contest the PDP primary. He also alleged that Obaseki’s defection to the party, a few days to the primary, was unreasonable and aimed at destabilising other aspirants.\n\nQ2: Did the court restrain Obaseki from the primary elections?\nA2: The court ordered that the PDP and the electoral umpire should not exempt any of the aspirants who have been cleared by the party from participating in the gubernatorial primary slated for the 25th June 2020.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: Linked evidence confirms a lawsuit was filed to prevent Godwin Obaseki from participating in primary elections but the lawsuit was dismissed by a Federal High Court.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: In Kenya the allocation of budgets to agriculture in the 2019/20 financial year is an increase of 0.6% from what was reported last year.\n\nQ1: How much was allocated to agriculture in the Kenyan budget 2019/20?\nA1: No answer could be found.\n\nQ2: How much was allocated to agriculture in the Kenyan budget 2018/19?\nA2: County Governments have allocated on average 6.7 % of their total budgets to the\nAgriculture sector.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: As no answer was found for the first question, its not possible to know if there was an increase of .6% so claim is not enough evidence. \n\nverdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Counties in Kenya have over the past year sustained an average allocation of 24% of their total budgets to the health sector\n\nQ1: How much was the total health budget for the 2018/2019 fiscal year\nA1: KSh123.380 billion\n\nQ2: What is the average percentage of the total health budget of the counties\nA2: 26.5%", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: It seems from the 2nd QA that the amount spent on health sector was more than 24%if the total budget. Therefore the claim is supported \n\nverdict: 'Supported'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: The allocation to agriculture is an increase of 0.6% from what was reported last year.\n\nQ1: How much was allocated to agriculture in 2019\nA1: County Governments have allocated on average 6.7 % of their total budgets to the\nAgriculture sector\n\nQ2: How much was allocated by the government to agriculture in 2020\nA2: No answer could be found.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: The answers do not tell me if there was an increase so there is not enough evidence for me to refute or support the claim.\n\nverdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Kenyan Counties allocated an average of 7.3% of budgets to agriculture.\n\nQ1: What was the 2019/20 budget for Kenyan Counties?\nA1: The approved aggregate budget estimates for the 47 County governments in amounted to Kshs.499.62 billion\n\nQ2: How much of the 2019/20 budget did Kenyan counties allocate to agriculture?\nA2: Ksh 34367.29 million\n6.9% of their total budget.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: The 2nd answer and source show that they allocated 6.9% to agriculture so the claim is refuted.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Counties in Kenya are striving to reach the 10% budget allocation to agriculture recommended by the Malabo declaration.\n\nQ1: Is Kenya able to implement the Malabo declaration at the national level\nA1: Kenya is suffering due to failure to implement commitments in agricultural development at national, regional and international level\n\nQ2: What percentage has the Kenyan government allocated to the fulfilment of the Malabo declaration\nA2: Kenya has allocated 4.8% to the fulfilment", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: The answer shows that 4.8% has been allocated so the claim is refuted.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Study Concludes that Mask Wearers Have Lower IQ\n\nQ1: Which study does the claim relate to ?\nA1: The claim originated in an article published by AmericasLastLineOfDefense.com on July 20, 2020 titled \"Study Concludes Mask Wearers Have Lower IQ\"\n\nQ2: What is known about the publisher: AmericasLastLineOfDefense.com?\nA2: They are a satire website.\n(story under section silly tater satire)", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: It seems the website isatire therefore the label is refuted \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: In Kenya, Water coverage now stands at 63% from 57%.\n\nQ1: What is water coverage\nA1: Population with access to water services (either with direct service connection or within reach of a public water point) as a percentage of the /total population under utility’s nominal responsibility\n\nQ2: what was the water coverage for Kenya in 2017/2018 year\nA2: 57 percent\n\nQ3: What is the water coverage of Kenya in 2018/2019\nA3: 59 percent", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: The water coverage statistic for 2018/2019, the latest available at the time of the claim, is 59% and not 63% as per claim.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Kenyan counties allocated an average of 7.3% of budgets to agriculture.\n\nQ1: When was this claim made?\nA1: 23/07/2020\n\nQ2: What percentage of their budget did the Kenyan counties allocate to agriculture?\nA2: 6.9% in the financial year 2019/2020", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: It seems from the 2nd QA that the number is lower, so the label is refuted \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Sanitation coverage is now at 25%, from 16%.\n\nQ1: What is sewered Sanitation coverage?\nA1: The number of people served with flush or pour-flush to piped sewer systems, as a percentage of the total population within the service area of the utility.\n\nQ2: What did the latest report published in 2020 say about the coverage?\nA2: It shows that sanitation coverage increased slightly from 16% in 2017/18 to 17% in 2018/19.\n\nQ3: What does the report say about 2020?\nA3: Does not contain reports for that year.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: There is not enough evidence. According to the QA pairs, the figure of 16% is justified but it is uncomparable as there is no statistics on current sanitation coverage. Therefore, there is not enough evidence.\n\nverdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Kenya's county governments have continued to adhere to the two-thirds gender principle. Four counties, Mombasa, Kilifi, Nyeri, and Migori, have gone higher and have a 50/50 representation of male and female CECs.\n\nQ1: Taking Kenya as a whole what percentage of county assembly members were female in 2019?\nA1: 33.6%\n\nQ2: Which counties had 50-50 gender parity?\nA2: The counties with highest percentage of female\nrepresentation were Mombasa, Kilifi, Nyeri and Migori at 50 per cent", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: Confirmed as 33.6% is just over 1/3\n\nverdict: 'Supported'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Two-thirds of the debt in the Australian budget was borrowed before the start of the pandemic\n\nQ1: What was Australia's Gross Debt in 2018?\nA1: $531.937 Billion AUD\n\nQ2: What was Australia's Gross Debt in 2019?\nA2: $541.992 Billion AUD\n\nQ3: What was Australia's Gross debt in 2020?\nA3: $684.298 Billion AUD\n\nQ4: When Did Australia register its first case of Covid-19?\nA4: By 31st January 2020 Australia and Malaysia had recorded a combined 8 cases at which time WHO declared a global health emergency.\n\nQ5: What percent increase is $541.992 Billion AUD to $684.298 Billion AUD ?\nA5: 100/541.992x684.298\n=126.256107101\n\nRounded to a 26.26% increase or just a little over 1/4 and less than 1/3", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: True\n\nverdict: 'Supported'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: The allocation to agriculture is an increase of 0.6% from what was reported last year in Kenya.\n\nQ1: what was the date of the claim?\nA1: 2020\n\nQ2: What was Kenya's budgetary allocation to agriculture in 2019?\nA2: 6.7%.\n\nQ3: What was Kenya's budgetary allocation to agriculture in 2020?\nA3: 6.9%\n\nQ4: What would the 2020 number need to be in order to be a jump of 0.6%?\nA4: A jump from 6.7% to 7.3% would be an increase of 0.6 percentage points", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: This information is not correct. The budgeted increase from 2019 to 2020 was 0.2%. A Q&A regarding the budget allocation in 2018 would confirm this inaccuracy in statement.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Modi Govt Make 'Country Of Origin' Label Mandatory on Products For GeM Platform.\n\nQ1: why is the 'country of origin' label mandatory on products for GeM platform\nA1: In a bid to promote Make in India and Aatma Nirbhar Bharat (Self-reliant India), the Government e-Marketplace (GeM) has mandated for sellers to spell out the \"Country of Origin\" of products they want to sell on the platform.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: The Label was made Mandatory on Products For GeM Platform in a bid to promote Make in India. \n\nverdict: 'Supported'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Joe Biden owns island next to sex offender Jeffrey Epstein’s hideaway.\n\nQ1: Does Joe Biden owns island next to sex offender Jeffrey Epstein’s hideaway?\nA1: Joe Biden does not own an island in the U.S. Virgin Islands\n\nQ2: How many Island does Joe Biden owns ?\nA2: The Keewaydin Island vacation home of Joe Biden’s brother, known as the “Biden Bungalow,” sold quietly for $1.35 million in February to the owners of a Florida-based architecture and design firm.\n\nCollier County property records show the buyer of the 4,000-square-foot home as a limited liability company titled, SC-Keewaydin, registered to John Cooney with Randall Stofft as an authorized agen", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: No evidence shows that Joe Biden owns island next to Jeffrey Epstein’s hideaway (U.S. Virgin Islands).\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Counties allocated an average of 7.3% of budgets to agriculture in 2019/20\n\nQ1: What was Kenya county governments total budget for 2019/20?\nA1: In FY 2019/20, the combined county governments’ budgets approved by the County Assemblies amounted to Kshs.499.62\nbillion\n\nQ2: How much of their 2019/20 budget did the Kenyan counties allocate to agriculture?\nA2: KSh 34.367 billion - 6.9% of total budget.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: If the statistics published as per source answer disagree with the stats in the claim, albeit by a fairly small margin, ie 0.4%, the claim label has to be refuted.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: [The allocation to agriculture] is an increase of 0.6% from what was reported last year.\n\nQ1: What was the percentage difference in agriculture allocation, compared to last years allocation in Kenya.\nA1: Counties have made remarkable achievements towards the realization of 100 per cent\nfood and nutrition security. To achieve this, County Governments have focused on\nimproving both crop and animal productivity. Some of the key interventions are:\n Empowerment of farmers through mechanization of production systems\nevidenced by the purchase of 366 tractors and equipping of 26 Agriculture\nmechanization stations offering lease services to rural farmers.\n Distribution of over 2 Million 50-kgs bags of subsidized fertilizer.\n Under the County subsidies arrangements, 1400 greenhouses have also been\npurchased and distributed to farmers in the year under review.\n Enhanced uptake of commercialized agriculture through construction of over 140\nmarkets that provided direct access to markets for farmers\n Vaccination of 46 Million Livestock and construction of over 500 cattle dips that\nhas improved disease control and surveillance.\nProvision of over 1 million recorded Artificial Insemination Services to livestock\nfarmers and purchase of over 300 Milk coolers distributed as input subsidies to\nfarmer’s co-operatives. In return this has enhanced animal productivity and value\naddition on raw products.\n County Governments have allocated on average 6.7 % of their total budgets to the\nAgriculture sector. This is just 3% less of the 10% recommended allocation as per\nthe Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Program (CAADP) Malabo\ndeclaration. The achievement of the 10% required or more would be realized if the\ndevolved monies held at the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Irrigation, are\nreleased to Counties. The Council will continue to pursue reforms in this sector to\nensure the best interest of the farmers in the Counties is achieved.\n On the overall, the performance of the agriculture sector in the year 2018/2019\nsignificantly improved as per the Economic Survey report 2019. Compared to\n2017/2018, maize production increased by 26.0 % from 35.4 million bags\n\nQ2: What was the percentage allocation for agriculture in 2019?\nA2: County Governments have allocated on average 6.7 % of their total budgets to the\nAgriculture sector. This is just 3% less of the 10% recommended allocation as per\nthe Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Program (CAADP) Malabo\ndeclaration.\n\nQ3: What was the percentage allocation for agriculture in 2020?\nA3: 6.9%\n\nQ4: What is 6.7% + 0.6%?\nA4: 7.3%", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: - Q&A 2 shows 6.9% allocated to agriculture in 2020 (time of claim)\n- Q&A 2 shows 6.7% allocated the year before which is 0.2% less than 2019 and not the +0.6% increase as claimed\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Little girl shown lying in a casket in a photo died from COVID-19.\n\nQ1: Can the image of the little girl be traced back to anything else?\nA1: On Thursday, January 23 2014, was the wake of Deisy García and Daughters in Queens New York USA who were brutally murdered by her husband Miguel Mejía Ramos (Mexican). \nImage is that of the little girl in casket.\n\nQ2: Does the image in the claim have an origin date?\nA2: Yes, because Jan. 24, 2014\n\nQ3: Where is the image location?\nA3: Philippines\n\nQ4: When is the Covid 19 outbreak shown to have appeared in the philopians?\nA4: January, 2020 first three cases were recorded in the Philippines", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: the picture was from 2014 meanwhile covid-19 started in 2019.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Water coverage now stands at 63%, up from 57% in Kenya.\n\nQ1: What is the definition of Water Coverage?\nA1: 1.1\tWater Coverage\tPopulation with access to water services (either with direct service connection or within reach of a public water point) as a percentage of the /total population under utility’s nominal responsibility\n\nQ2: Which organisation in Kenya monitors Water Coverage in that country?\nA2: Water Services Regulatory Board. (WASREB)\n\nTheir mandate states their powers and functions include:\n'Determine and prescribe national standards for the provision of water services and asset development for water services providers.'\n\nQ3: At the time of the claim (July 23 2020) what did the Water Services Regulatory Board say about water coverage in Kenya?\nA3: The Water Services Regulatory Board (WASREB) has released the 12th issue of Impact Report. The report is meant to give feedback to the public on how the water services sector is performing, with a view to holding to account institutions charged with service delivery. The report relies on data collected annually from Water Service Providers (WSPs) through the Water Regulation Information System (WARIS). The 12th edition covers the period 2018/2019 and analyses the performance of 87 Water Service Providers and 47 Counties.\n\nQ4: At the time of the claim, is their any evidence in the WASREB report for the figure of 63% coverage?\nA4: No. The report refers to the period 2018/19 and states: 'The average Water Coverage was 59%, which is a growth of 2 percentage points from 2017/18 where coverage was 57%.'\n\nQ5: So is there any data from the year in the claim?\nA5: No, this period is not covered", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: there isn't enough data from the year of the claim to confirm if the water coverage has gone up to 63%\n\nverdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Mandatory vaccinations is in direct violation of the Nuremberg Code.\n\nQ1: What is the Nuremberg Code?\nA1: The Nuremberg Code is a 10-point set of rules for the conduct of human experiments articulated in 1947 in the trials of Nazi doctors and bureaucrats convicted of crimes against humanity for their roles in concentration camp experiments.\n\nQ2: What does the Nuremberg Code say about vaccines and vaccinations?\nA2: Nothing.\n\nQ3: So doe's the Nuremburg code have anything to do with Vaccines ?\nA3: No, it only addresses Human experimentation. Vaccines are not mentioned at any point.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: Q&A 2 and 3 show that vaccination is not even mentioned in the Nuremberg code so makes the main point in the claim Null, as mandatory vaccination cannot be a violation of the code if there in no mention of vaccination at all.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Kenyan counties have over the past year sustained an average allocation of 24% of their total budgets to the health sector.\n\nQ1: Is there official data to show the budgets allocated to health?\nA1: Yes, because The Link below shows web table where the average budget of 24% is allocated to Health.\n\nQ2: If you average out the amount of allocation by adding it up then dividing by the counties, do you get an average of 24%?\nA2: Counties have over the past year sustained an average allocation of 24% of their total budgets to the health sector.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: The question-answer pair proves that the claim is true\n\nverdict: 'Supported'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Water coverage in Kenya now stands at 63% from 57%.\n\nQ1: What does the claim mean by 'Water coverage in Kenya'\nA1: Water coverage is the “population with access to water services, either with direct service connection or within reach of a public water point\n\nQ2: Who makes this definition for 'water coverage'?\nA2: The international benchmarking network.\n\nQ3: When was the claim made?\nA3: July 2020\n\nQ4: Who tracks water coverage in Kenya?\nA4: The water services regulatory board.\n\nQ5: What is the most recent report on Kenya's water coverage from the water services regulatory board?\nA5: It’s most recent report, published in 2020, covers the 2018/19 financial year.\n\nQ6: What does the report show for the percentage of Kenya with water coverage?\nA6: The data shows that water coverage improved from 57% in 2017/18 to 59% in 2018/19.\n\nQ7: Is there any data for 2020?\nA7: No, because the most recent report in 2020 only covers the 2017/18 financial year.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: There is no data from the current period, so there is no way to confirm this claim.\n\nverdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Man dies at the R N Cooper Hospital in Mumbai due to medical negligence.\n\nQ1: What is RN Cooper hospital in Mumbai?\nA1: Dr R. N. Cooper Municipal General Hospital is a public hospital located in Mumbai. It is owned by the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) and is operated under a public-private partnership.\n\nQ2: Did the BMC address this claim?\nA2: Yes, because He was bleeding from mouth&was immediately given primary aid. Symptoms of pneumonia were seen. Symptoms of pneumonia&COVID are similar, cause of death was registered as pneumonia&suspected COVID. As per ICMR protocol his body was handed over to Police but family got agitated: BMC\nHospital mgmt did what was prescribed under ICMR guidelines & patient was immediately admitted and was given the required treatment. So this is not true that there was some carelessness by the hospital. Allegations on Hospital and Municipal authorities are unfortunate: BMC\n\nQ3: What is the ICMR?\nA3: ICMR- National Centre for Disease Informatics and Research\n\nQ4: Were the ICMR guidelines followed?\nA4: Hospital mgmt did what was prescribed under ICMR guidelines & patient was immediately admitted and was given the required treatment. So this is not true that there was some carelessness by the hospital.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: there is no evidence that the man in question died due to medical negligence, or hospital error. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: There Is An Upcoming Shortage Of Dr. Pepper Because Of The Coronavirus\n\nQ1: How is COVID-19 affecting DR. Pepper\nA1: The company is donating beverages as part of the #FuelingtheFrontline initiative during the pandemic\n\nQ2: Has the production of Dr. Pepper slowed down because of COVID-19 pandemic\nA2: Searching on Bloomberg.com does not produce any report of the sort", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: Searching on Bloomberg.com does not produce any report of the sort \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: New Zealand has authorised troops to enter homes to enforce COVID-19 quarantine.\n\nQ1: What is the NZDF's role in managing New Zealand's quarantine measures?\nA1: New Zealand Defence Force staff are at managed isolation and quarantine facilities.\n\nQ2: Who can enter homes under New Zealand's Covid-19 laws?\nA2: A constable may enter a private dwellinghouse without warrant only if they have reasonable grounds to believe that people have gathered there in contravention of a COVID-19 order and entry is necessary for the purpose of giving a direction under section 21.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: In New Zealand constables not troops, are authorised to enter homes to enforce COVID-19 quarantine.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: US Home Health workers receive low pay, Limited benefits and 40% of them are on SNAP or Medicaid.\n\nQ1: What is the eligibility Criteria for SNAP?\nA1: To be eligible for SNAP you must have a Gross monthly income that falls within 130 percent of the federal poverty level OR Net monthly income\n100 percent of the federal poverty level.\n\nQ2: What is the eligibility Criteria for Medicaid?\nA2: Adults with incomes up to 138% of the Federal Poverty Level (FPL) are eligible for Medicaid.\n\nQ3: What Figure is the Federal poverty level amount ?\nA3: The Federal Poverty Level (FPL) is $12,760.\n\nQ4: What % of Direct care workers receive any public assistance?\nA4: 53%", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: While the number of direct care workers, appears to be higher than 40%, it is a supported statement. \n\nverdict: 'Supported'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Indiana woman charged for mail in voter fraud, delivered 400 ballots with Democrat box prechecked\n\nQ1: Was an Indiana woman charged with voter fraud in the U.S.?\nA1: Yes, because Prosecutors have filed a felony election fraud charge against Vanderburgh County Democratic Party activist Jan Reed, who was accused last month of illegally sending hundreds of absentee ballot applications", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: Answer & source are about the felony charge.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: USA is setting record job numbers.\n\nQ1: Was there US job growth in 2020?\nA1: Yes, May and June saw significant non-farm job growth in May & June that broke the 1.1m record growth of Sept 1983.\nBut these large increases followed a drop of more than 20 million jobs in April", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: The answer and source show that they did break a record in 2020 but then the job numbers dropped a lot and so the claim is cherry picking.\n\nverdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Mel Gibson accused Hollywood of child sacrifices and paedophillia.\n\nQ1: Was Hollywood accused by Mel Gibson for child sacrifices and paedophilia\nA1: No, because He has not spoken or made any statement as regarding sexual assault or child sacrifices", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: No evidence he made this accusation. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: A study finds a diet heavy with kimchi—spiced fermented cabbage and other vegetables—helps lower South Korea's COVID-19 fatalities.\n\nQ1: Has eating kimchi, spicy fermented cabbage, and other vegetables helped lower COVID-19 fatalities in Korea?\nA1: No answer could be found.\n\nQ2: Has there been a study on the consumption of fermented vegetables and COVID-19 mortality?\nA2: Yes, because A study titled 'Association between consumption of fermented vegetables and COVID-19 mortality at a country level in Europe'\n\nQ3: Is Korea mentioned in the study on the consumption of fermented vegetables and COVID-19 mortality report?\nA3: No, because The study is focused in Europe.\n\nQ4: Could the study be extrapolated to Korea?\nA4: No, because Our study was restricted to European countries, so its results cannot be extrapolated to other regions\n\nQ5: Can this study be relied upon?\nA5: No, because This article is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed [what does this mean?]. It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice.\n\nQ6: Are there any references to Korea, Covid-19 and fermented cabbage in medical articles?\nA6: Yes, because Nutrition may therefore play a role in the immune defense against COVID-19 and may explain some of the differences seen in COVID-19 across Europe. It will be needed to test dietary differences between low and high-rate countries. Foods with potent antioxidant or anti ACE activity—like uncooked or fermented cabbage [28,29,30]—are largely consumed in low-death rate European countries, Korea and Taiwan, and might be considered in the low prevalence of deaths.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: The research was not based around South Korea and cannot be extrapolated.\n\nverdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Greenhouse gases emitted into the ocean are causing more holes in the ozone layer; the ozone layer has holes in it, causing global temperatures to rise.\n\nQ1: What causes holes in the ozone layer?\nA1: ...bromine gases from human-produced chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and halons have destroyed ozone molecules.\n\nQ2: Are the ozone holes causing the global temperature to rise?\nA2: Because the ozone layer normally blocks ultraviolet (UV) light, an ozone hole allows more UV light than usual to reach the surface. However, the additional energy added to the Earth system from the ozone hole is so small that it couldn’t be responsible for the warming trend that’s been occurring.\n\nQ3: What are the main causes of global warming?\nA3: The main driver of climate change is the greenhouse effect. Some gases in the Earth's atmosphere act a bit like the glass in a greenhouse, trapping the sun's heat and stopping it from leaking back into space and causing global warming.\n\nMany of these greenhouse gases occur naturally, but human activities are increasing the concentrations of some of them in the atmosphere, in particular:\n\ncarbon dioxide (CO2)\nmethane\nnitrous oxide\nfluorinated gases\nCO2 produced by human activities is the largest contributor to global warming. By 2020, its concentration in the atmosphere had risen to 48% above its pre-industrial level (before 1750).\n\nQ4: Is chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) a greenhouse gas?\nA4: Yes, because Chlorofluorocarbons are exceptionally strong greenhouse gases and are also responsible for the destruction of stratospheric ozone.\n\nQ5: How is ozone depletion affecting climate change?\nA5: Atmospheric ozone has two effects on the temperature balance of the Earth. It absorbs solar ultraviolet radiation, which heats the stratosphere. It also absorbs infrared radiation emitted by the Earth's surface, effectively trapping heat in the troposphere. Therefore, the climate impact of changes in ozone concentrations varies with the altitude at which these ozone changes occur. The major ozone losses that have been observed in the lower stratosphere due to the human-produced chlorine- and bromine-containing gases have a cooling effect on the Earth's surface. On the other hand, the ozone increases that are estimated to have occurred in the troposphere because of surface-pollution gases have a warming effect on the Earth's surface, thereby contributing to the \"greenhouse\" effect.\n\nQ6: What does the claim state that the ocean does to put holes into the ozone layer?\nA6: The post states that greenhouse gases that are emitted into the ocean, are then released by the ocean and effect the ozone layer.\n\nQ7: Are green house gasses what cause holes in the ozone layer?\nA7: No, because Greenhouse gasses (GHG's) are a gas that absorbs and emits radiant energy (heat)\n\nQ8: What causes the holes in ozone?\nA8: chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and halons destroy ozone molecules", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: Greenhouse gas doesn't cause holes in the ozone layer, and holes in the ozone doesn't contribute much to rising global temperatures\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: A rare yellow turtle was spotted in Balasore, Odisha.\n\nQ1: When was this claim made?\nA1: 20/07/2020\n\nQ2: Has a rare yellow turtle been sighted in Balasore, Odisha?\nA2: Yes, because Balasore: Residents of a village in Odisha's Balasore district, 196 km from capital Bhubaneswar, witnessed a unique sight on Sunday. They spotted a turtle, yellow in colour.\nA senior wildlife officer said it is a rare spotting.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: There are clear photos in the report showing the turtle so the claim is supported.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: US space agency NASA has added a 13th star sign named \"Ophiuchus\" to the zodiac.\n\nQ1: what are the signs of the zodiac\nA1: ♈ Aries (Ram): March 21–April 19\n\n♉ Taurus (Bull): April 20–May 20\n\n♊ Gemini (Twins): May 21–June 21\n\n♋ Cancer (Crab): June 22–July 22\n\n♌ Leo (Lion): July 23–August 22\n\n♍ Virgo (Virgin): August 23–September 22\n\n♎ Libra (Balance): September 23–October 23\n\n♏ Scorpius (Scorpion): October 24–November 21\n\n♐ Sagittarius (Archer): November 22–December 21\n\n♑ Capricornus (Goat): December 22–January 19\n\n♒ Aquarius (Water Bearer): January 20–February 18\n\n♓ Pisces (Fish): February 19–March 20\n\nQ2: Is there a 13th star sign?\nA2: We see your comments about a zodiac story that re-emerges every few years. No, we did not change the zodiac. \n\nWhen the Babylonians invented the constellations 3,000 years ago, they chose to leave out a 13th sign.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: NASA clearly denied in their twitter status adding a 13th star sign.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Medical experts from the World Health Organization (WHO), US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and The New England Journal of Medicine have warned against wearing face masks because they can cause “severe health issues”.\n\nQ1: What is the WHO's advice concerning the wearing of face masks?\nA1: Masks are a key measure to suppress transmission and save lives.\n\nMasks should be used as part of a comprehensive ‘Do it all!’ approach including physical distancing, avoiding crowded, closed and close-contact settings, good ventilation, cleaning hands, covering sneezes and coughs, and more.\n\nDepending on the type, masks can be used for either protection of healthy persons or to prevent onward transmission.\n\nQ2: What is the CDC's advice concerning the wearing of face masks?\nA2: CDC recommends that people wear masks in public settings, at events and gatherings, and anywhere they will be around other people.\n\nQ3: What is the New England Journal of Medicine's (NEJM) advice concerning the wearing of face masks?\nA3: We therefore strongly support the calls of public health agencies for all people to wear masks when circumstances compel them to be within 6 ft of others for sustained periods.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: The three agencies mentioned all have publicly supported the use of masks \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Former President of the United States, Theodore Roosevelt once said \"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.\"\n\nQ1: Did Theodore Roosevelt say \"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.\"\nA1: Not featured on a website about his quotes.\n\nQ2: Who said - To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth?\nA2: This website attributes it to Rush Limbaugh.\n\nQ3: was Micheal Berry correct\nA3: He attributed the quote to the wrong person", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: attributed to Rush Limbaugh.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: As of July 2020 Covid-19 vaccines are not safe, because of the accelerated pace of their development\n\nQ1: As of July 2020, are Covid-19 vaccines safe, considering their pace of their development?\nA1: Covid 19 vaccies are safe as on July 2020.\n\nQ2: Are the Covid-19 vaccines not safe, because of the accelerated pace of their development as of July 2020 ?\nA2: The vaccines are all designed to provoke an immune response by training our bodies to recognise and fight the virus.New vaccines undergo rigorous safety checks before they can be recommended for widespread use,\" says Michelle Roberts, BBC online health editor.There are 25 different candidate vaccines in clinical trials around the world according to the World Health Organization (WHO), but none of them will alter human DNA and they do not contain technology to link people up to an artificial intelligence interface. So this claim made by Carrie Madej that vaccines will change DNA and it will connct us to AI interface is a false claim.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: QA pair states they undergo rigorous safety checks before they can be recommended for wide spread use.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: The WHO has said that cats and dogs cannot contract Covid-19.\n\nQ1: What has been said by the WHO concerning COVID-19 between humans and animals\nA1: COVID-19 is spread through human-to-human transmission.\n\nWe already know a lot about other viruses in the coronavirus family and most of these types of viruses have an origin in animals. The COVID-19 virus (also called SARS-CoV-2) is a new virus in humans. The possible animal source of COVID-19 has not yet been confirmed but research is ongoing.\n\nQ2: Has the WHO confirmed the contraction of COVID-19 virus by cats and dogs\nA2: Several dogs and cats (domestic cats and tigers) in contact with infected humans have tested positive for COVID-19\n\nQ3: What has been said by the WHO concerning COVID-19 between humans and animals?\nA3: COVID-19 is spread through human-to-human transmission.\n\nWe already know a lot about other viruses in the coronavirus family and most of these types of viruses have an origin in animals. The COVID-19 virus (also called SARS-CoV-2) is a new virus in humans. The possible animal source of COVID-19 has not yet been confirmed but research is ongoing.\n\nQ4: Has the WHO confirmed the contraction of COVID-19 virus by cats and dogs?\nA4: Several dogs and cats (domestic cats and tigers) in contact with infected humans have tested positive for COVID-19\n\nQ5: Can dogs and cats transmit COVID-19 to humans?\nA5: there is no evidence that these animals can transmit the disease to humans and spread COVID-19", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: the WHO has not confirmed this at the time of the claim, as many animals did test positive for COVID\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: United States space agency NASA has added a 13th Zodiac sign named “Ophiuchus” to the list of existing 12 Zodiac signs.\n\nQ1: Did NASA have anything to say about a 13th Zodiac sign?\nA1: Here at NASA, we study astronomy, not astrology. We didn’t change any zodiac signs, we just did the math.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: Nasa deals in astronomy not astrology so not their fielf\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Netflix will end its Turkish service after the production of an upcoming local drama that was blocked by the country’s government over a gay character.\n\nQ1: What happened in Turkey with the gay character?\nA1: They were filming a show with a gay character and the government denied Netflix a a filming license because of it. Turkey’s Radio and Television Supreme Council had confirmed earlier this month that the character was removed after a request from the council.\n\nQ2: Did Netflix stop all services in Turkey?\nA2: No, because Netflix confirmed that it has canceled production on its original Turkish series but it didn’t halt all of its production services as mentioned in the circulating claims.\n\nQ3: Did Turkish government blocked Netflix service over production of a local drama with gay character ?\nA3: Turkey's Radio and Television Supreme Council (RTÜK) confirmed Thursday that a homosexual character in Turkey’s “Aşk 101” (Love 101) series on Netflix was removed after a request from the council.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: Netflix stopped product of one series but has not withdrawn from Turkey.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: COVID-19 vaccine is DNA-altering and has been fast-tracked through safety qualifications.\n\nQ1: Dp covid19 vaccine alter dna?\nA1: No, none of the vaccines alter one’s DNA", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: there is no evidence of vaccines altering dna \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: In Madipur area of Delhi,three jihadists killed a minor boy in the middle of a road with a knife for a petty matter.\n\nQ1: Who were the people who killed the boy in question?\nA1: They were three boys aged 15-17 years, also hindus from the same community.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: The boys were Hindus, therefore not [Muslim] jihadists.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Joe Biden wants to end school choice\n\nQ1: Did president Donald Trump support 'school choice'?\nA1: The Trump administration has advocated for increased school choice, arguing that it would allow residents living in distressed communities the opportunity to send their children to more competitive educational institutions.\n\nQ2: What is 'school choice'?\nA2: At its most basic, school choice means students can request to attend any public school\n\nQ3: Did Joe Biden say he did not support a school choice?\nA3: No, because He said “the bottom line is charters schools siphon off money for our public schools, which are already in enough trouble.”\n\nQ4: Does joe biden support charter schools?\nA4: Joe Biden said 'I Am Not a Charter School Fan'\n\nQ5: What are 'charter schools'?\nA5: Charter schools are schools that are publicly funded but operated by independent groups. (The name comes from the contract, or \"charter,\" that a group gets to operate a school.)", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: Biden did not categorically say he wants to end school choice, he only complained about charters schools siphoning off money for public schools. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: President Trump tweeted 'Child Lifes Matter' Should Be Painted On Hollywood Streets\n\nQ1: Where did this quote appear?\nA1: On a fake twitter account @realDonalTrump_", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: Where did this quote appear?\nThis question is written vaguely, proper question is not formed. \nIt should have been -\nIs the claim about child's life written by Trump's ?\nAnswer: It seems that the twitter account where this claim was made is fake.\n\n\nThats how questions and answers are formed. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Cal Cunningham, North Carolina’s 2020 Democratic Senate candidate, voted to raise taxes in the state by over $1 billion in 2001.\n\nQ1: Did the North Carolina state legislature vote to increase taxes by over $1 billion in 2001?\nA1: Yes, because According to reporting by The Charlotte Observer at the time, the two-year budget passed by Democratic state lawmakers and one House Republican in 2001 included a 1/2-cent statewide sales tax increase, for two years, that did not apply to food.\nThe overall tax increases amounted to $1 billion over two years.\n\nQ2: When did Cal Cunningham serve as an elected Democratic state senator in North Carolina?\nA2: Cal Cunningham won the North Carolina District 23 State Senate election in 2000 and served a two year term from 2001 to 2003.\n\nQ3: As a state senator did Cal Cunningham vote in favour of the 2001 North Carolina 2 year state budget which increased taxes by over $1 billion?\nA3: In an August 10, 2020 interview with WLOS, Cunningham said \"I think that was the right budget for North Carolina.\"", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: Confirmed in Q+A pairs\n\n\"the two-year budget passed by Democratic state lawmakers and one House Republican in 2001 included a 1/2-cent statewide sales tax increase, for two years, that did not apply to food.\nThe overall tax increases amounted to $1 billion over two years\"\n\nverdict: 'Supported'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Donald Trump tweeted, “WHO Thinks ‘Child Lifes Matter’ Should Be PAINTED In The STREETS OF HOLLYWOOD???\n\nQ1: Did Donald trump make the tweet ?\nA1: No it was from a fake unverified account username: @realdonaldtrump_ (underscore on the end)\n\nthe account has now been suspended.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: Seems that Donald trump did not tweet this, therefore the claim is refuted \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: CORONAVIRUS IS A LAB-ENGINEERED BIOWEAPON\n\nQ1: Is the origin of Covid 19 known?\nA1: Many health experts believe that the new strain of coronavirus likely originated in bats or pangolins.\n\nQ2: Where was the first human covid 19 case reported?\nA2: The first transmission to humans was in Wuhan, China.\n\nQ3: Can animals transmit covid 19?\nA3: SARS-CoV-2 was probably transmitted to humans by other animals\n\nQ4: Was a Lab the origin of the covid 19 virus?\nA4: A group of 27 prominent public health scientists from outside China is pushing back against a steady stream of stories and even a scientific paper suggesting a laboratory in Wuhan, China, may be the origin of the outbreak of COVID-19.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: Credible sources of evidence provided to support theory that coronavirus occurred naturally, and to specifically push back against claims it originated in a lab. No evidence provided to support theory it originated in a lab.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases wrote: I reject the notion that it’s 'just a virus’ and we’ll all get it eventually. What a careless, lazy, heartless stance.\n\nQ1: Have searches proved that Dr.Fauci made these comments ?\nA1: No, because A user named Amy Wright has taken credit for the statement.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: This claim is refuted. The quote in the claim is said to come from facebook user Amy Wright, not Anthony Fauci. Therefore, this claim is refuted. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: The Governor of Osun State, Gboyega Oyetola, was in Abuja for three days and was not able to see Governor Mai Mala Buni, who is the Chairman of the All Progressives Congress (APC) National Caretaker Committee.\n\nQ1: Did Governor of Osun State Gboyega Oyetola spend three days in Abuja without seeing Governor Mai Mala Buni?\nA1: No, because Governor Adegboyega Oyetola in Abuja today, Friday, July 17, with the All Progressives Congress National Caretaker Committee Chairman and Yobe Governor, Mai Mala Buni, shortly before the Committee's meeting at the party's National Secretariat.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: Governor Gboyega Oyetola did not spend three days in Abuja and he met with the Chairman of the All Progressives Congress (APC) National Caretaker Committee.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Washing glasses with soap will prevent lenses from fogging whilst wearing a mask.\n\nQ1: How do you prevent spectacle lenses from misting up when wearing a face mask\nA1: Immediately before wearing a face mask, wash the spectacles with soapy water and shake off the excess. Then, let the spectacles air dry or gently dry off the lenses with a soft tissue before putting them back on. Now the spectacle lenses should not mist up when the face mask is worn.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: Accurate\n\nverdict: 'Supported'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Hackers in China hide phishing codes inside WhatsApp good morning and good night images or videos, to steal personal information, such as bank card information and other data.\n\nQ1: Where did the claim originate from?\nA1: WhatsApp messages referencing Shanghai China International News.\n\nQ2: What is Shanghai China International News?\nA2: No answer could be found.\n\nQ3: How many reports of phising has occured in India due to the claim?\nA3: No reports", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: No incidents of this could be found and if this was happening, there would be reports. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Shanghai China International News asked all subscribers not to send good morning and good night images or videos on WhatsApp\n\nQ1: Is there a news website called Shanghai China International News?\nA1: No, because Could not find any evidence of them online.\n\nQ2: Can ‘digital steganography’ be used in emojis on whatsapp?\nA2: No answer could be found.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: There seems to be no evidence of this claim being true. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: A covid patient died outside a medical shop in Siwan India, which is the constituency of Bihar's Health Minister.\n\nQ1: Who was the man who died ?\nA1: “The man in the image is Dharmanath Rai, a resident of Rajpur village. On July 17, he had come to Siwan town for some business deal and collapsed in front of a shop. Health officials later took him to the nearby government hospital. According to the medical report, he died due to cardiac arrest. His family said he did not have any Covid-19 symptom. So we did not conduct a Covid-19 test on his body and handed the body to his family,” Pandey told.https://www.facebook.com/dialog/share_open_graph?action_properties=%7B%22object%22%3A%7B%22og%3Aurl%22%3A%22https%3A%2F%2Fweb.archive.org%2Fweb%2F20210412143711%2Fhttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.indiatoday.in%2Ffact-check%2Fstory%2Ffact-check-image-of-deceased-man-falsely-linked-to-covid-19-and-bihar-bjp-minister-1702020-2020-07-18%3Futm_source%3Dfbshare%26utm_medium%3Dsocialicons%26utm_campaign%3Dshareurltracking%22%2C%22og%3Atitle%22%3A%22Fact%20Check%3A%20Image%20of%20deceased%20man%20falsely%20linked%20to%20Covid-19%20and%20Bihar%20BJP%20minister%22%2C%22og%3Adescription%22%3A%22%22%2C%22og%3Aimage%22%3A%22https%3A%2F%2Fweb.archive.org%2Fweb%2F20210412143711%2Fhttps%3A%2F%2Fakm-img-a-in.tosshub.com%2Findiatoday%2Fimages%2Fstory%2F202007%2Fimage_0-647x363.jpeg%3FDuWdaI0m82koviShWO6eGU0S6NWd9Lro%22%7D%7D&action_type=og.shares&app_id=693568120778492&channel_url=https%3A%2F%2Fstaticxx.facebook.com%2Fx%2Fconnect%2Fxd_arbiter%2F%3Fversion%3D46%23cb%3Df2a106f3fd78bb2%26domain%3Dwww.indiatoday.in%26origin%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fwww.indiatoday.in%252Ff5bd354e974845%26relation%3Dopener&display=popup&e2e=%7B%7D&fallback_redirect_uri=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.indiatoday.in%2Ffact-check%2Fstory%2Ffact-check-image-of-deceased-man-falsely-linked-to-covid-19-and-bihar-bjp-minister-1702020-2020-07-18&locale=en_US&next=https%3A%2F%2Fstaticxx.facebook.com%2Fx%2Fconnect%2Fxd_arbiter%2F%3Fversion%3D46%23cb%3Df1a59b0131a7a59%26domain%3Dwww.indiatoday.in%26origin%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fwww.indiatoday.in%252Ff5bd354e974845%26relation%3Dopener%26frame%3Df80d582485716d%2\n\nQ2: Is Siwan the constituency of Bihar's Health Minister?\nA2: ccording to the Bihar assembly website, BJP’s Vyas Dev Prasad is the MLA of Siwan constituency. Though Pandey is from Siwan district, it is not his constituency. The health minister is a member of Bihar’s legislative council, i.e. its upper house, and does not represent any assembly constituency.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: The answers show that the man was not a covid patient and Siwan is not Bihars constituency so the claim is refuted.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: A black kid named Tyrone Woodfork was arrested yesterday for severely beating an elderly Tulsa, Oklahoma, white couple, raping and killing the wife and leaving the husband for dead and the national media is ignoring the crime\n\nQ1: Who is Tyrone Woodfork?\nA1: Tyrone Woodfork, 20, entered the house and attacked, allegedly beating and sexually assaulted Strait's 85-year-old wife, Nancy Strait, who died two days later. The couple had been married for 65 years.\n\nQ2: When did this happen?\nA2: In 2012\n\nQ3: Was Tyrone Woodfork arrested recently for murder?\nA3: A 22-year-old Oklahoma man will spend the rest of his life behind bars after being found guilty of the brutal 2012 murder of an elderly woman and savage beating of her husband.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: Evidence finds that the national media did cover this crime, i.e., the Daily Mail (seen through the Q3 source). This crime also happened back in 2012, while the claim was made in 2020. Hence, the claim is refuted.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: The Bank of America pledged $1 billion dollars to Black Lives Matter.\n\nQ1: Did The Bank of America pledge to donate $1 billion to Black Lives Matter?\nA1: Bank of America announced today that it is making a $1 billion, four-year commitment of additional support to help local communities address economic and racial inequality accelerated by a global pandemic. The programs will be focused on assisting people and communities of color that have experienced a greater impact from the health crisis.\n\nQ2: What area would the $1 billion dollars donations of The Bank of America be spent on?\nA2: Areas of focus will be:\n\n Health\n Jobs/Training/Reskilling/Upskilling\n Support to Small Businesses\n Housing\n\nThe programs will be executed through the company’s 90 local U.S. market presidents and non-U.S.\n\nQ3: Is this money going to the actual organisation \"black lives matter\"?\nA3: No, because This isn’t true. Bank of America announced it would donate the funds over the next four years to communities of color and minority-owned businesses that have experienced a greater impact from the COVID-19 health crisis.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "justification: The bank is not specifically donating to the Black Lives Matter charity so the claim is refuted.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'", "role": "assistant" } ]