Datasets:

hitachi-nlp

/

FLD.v2.reimpl

like 0

0.3

This turnstone is not a Sabin.

¬{A}{a}

fact1: The fact that something is a Sabin but it is not a roundedness does not hold if the fact that it is not an adage hold. fact2: This neritina is not a kind of an adage if the fact that it is a kind of an ease and it is a Cymatiidae is wrong. fact3: Some man is not a Sabin if that it is a Sabin and it is not a kind of a roundedness does not hold. fact4: If that this turnstone is an adage but this thing is not a roundedness is not right then this ridgeline is a Sabin. fact5: The cocuswood is a Sabin. fact6: This turnstone is a Sabin.

fact1: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬({A}x & ¬{C}x) fact2: ¬({D}{b} & {E}{b}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact3: (x): ¬({A}x & ¬{C}x) -> ¬{A}x fact4: ¬({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> {A}{dh} fact5: {A}{ik} fact6: {A}{a}

This ridgeline is a Sabin.

{A}{dh}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that something is a Sabin but it is not a roundedness does not hold if the fact that it is not an adage hold. fact2: This neritina is not a kind of an adage if the fact that it is a kind of an ease and it is a Cymatiidae is wrong. fact3: Some man is not a Sabin if that it is a Sabin and it is not a kind of a roundedness does not hold. fact4: If that this turnstone is an adage but this thing is not a roundedness is not right then this ridgeline is a Sabin. fact5: The cocuswood is a Sabin. fact6: This turnstone is a Sabin. ; $hypothesis$ = This turnstone is not a Sabin. ; $proof$ =

fact6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That that playing risibility happens and this disgraced does not happens is false.

¬({AA} & ¬{AB})

fact1: The fact that that playing risibility occurs but this disgraced does not happens is false if that striving Burhinidae occurs. fact2: If the fact that that neglecting occurs and the Mexidoes not occurs is incorrect then that neglecting does not occurs. fact3: That the diluting Vulpecula but notthe hives happens is false. fact4: That this facial happens yields that that screening Tokyo does not occurs and the calciferousness does not occurs. fact5: The fact that both that playing risibility and this disgraced happens does not hold. fact6: That striving Burhinidae happens and this espial happens if that screening Tokyo does not happens. fact7: If this grossing Hodur does not happens then that that neglecting happens and the Mexidoes not occurs does not hold. fact8: This grossing Hodur does not happens if that this decreasing Desmanthus and this coup happens does not hold. fact9: That both this decreasing Desmanthus and this coup occurs is incorrect if this recurring does not occurs. fact10: The fact that the fact that the scalar happens and the endoergicness does not happens is false is not wrong. fact11: That the fact that the cationicness happens and that proselytism does not occurs hold does not hold if the injectableness occurs. fact12: The fact that that playing risibility occurs and this disgraced happens does not hold if that striving Burhinidae happens. fact13: That this facial happens and that calamity occurs is caused by that that neglecting does not occurs.

fact1: {A} -> ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) fact2: ¬({F} & ¬{H}) -> ¬{F} fact3: ¬({HA} & ¬{GJ}) fact4: {D} -> (¬{B} & ¬{C}) fact5: ¬({AA} & {AB}) fact6: ¬{B} -> ({A} & {CJ}) fact7: ¬{G} -> ¬({F} & ¬{H}) fact8: ¬({I} & {J}) -> ¬{G} fact9: ¬{K} -> ¬({I} & {J}) fact10: ¬({FH} & ¬{CB}) fact11: {BL} -> ¬({JE} & ¬{CK}) fact12: {A} -> ¬({AA} & {AB}) fact13: ¬{F} -> ({D} & {E})

This espial occurs.

{CJ}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that that playing risibility occurs but this disgraced does not happens is false if that striving Burhinidae occurs. fact2: If the fact that that neglecting occurs and the Mexidoes not occurs is incorrect then that neglecting does not occurs. fact3: That the diluting Vulpecula but notthe hives happens is false. fact4: That this facial happens yields that that screening Tokyo does not occurs and the calciferousness does not occurs. fact5: The fact that both that playing risibility and this disgraced happens does not hold. fact6: That striving Burhinidae happens and this espial happens if that screening Tokyo does not happens. fact7: If this grossing Hodur does not happens then that that neglecting happens and the Mexidoes not occurs does not hold. fact8: This grossing Hodur does not happens if that this decreasing Desmanthus and this coup happens does not hold. fact9: That both this decreasing Desmanthus and this coup occurs is incorrect if this recurring does not occurs. fact10: The fact that the fact that the scalar happens and the endoergicness does not happens is false is not wrong. fact11: That the fact that the cationicness happens and that proselytism does not occurs hold does not hold if the injectableness occurs. fact12: The fact that that playing risibility occurs and this disgraced happens does not hold if that striving Burhinidae happens. fact13: That this facial happens and that calamity occurs is caused by that that neglecting does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That that playing risibility happens and this disgraced does not happens is false. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That nonfunctionalness occurs if that bewitching occurs.

{A} -> {B}

fact1: The fact that that unpermissiveness and this workingsing happens is incorrect. fact2: That nonfunctionalness occurs if the fact that the fact that notthat unpermissiveness but this workingsing happens hold is not true. fact3: If the kinestheticness occurs that notthe rusting Leger but the rail happens is wrong. fact4: The fact that both the resecting forethought and this waxing fingerpointing happens is incorrect. fact5: If this intussuscepting capitation happens then the fact that both the lading and the lockstep happens is incorrect. fact6: If that bewitching occurs then that the fact that that unpermissiveness does not occurs but this workingsing happens is right does not hold. fact7: The alluviation occurs. fact8: The fact that this bone happens and this syncategorematicness happens does not hold. fact9: The intertidalness occurs.

fact1: ¬({AA} & {AB}) fact2: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) -> {B} fact3: {IC} -> ¬(¬{EF} & {AS}) fact4: ¬({HU} & {BJ}) fact5: {D} -> ¬({DP} & {AT}) fact6: {A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) fact7: {AH} fact8: ¬({HP} & {AN}) fact9: {GK}

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that that unpermissiveness and this workingsing happens is incorrect. fact2: That nonfunctionalness occurs if the fact that the fact that notthat unpermissiveness but this workingsing happens hold is not true. fact3: If the kinestheticness occurs that notthe rusting Leger but the rail happens is wrong. fact4: The fact that both the resecting forethought and this waxing fingerpointing happens is incorrect. fact5: If this intussuscepting capitation happens then the fact that both the lading and the lockstep happens is incorrect. fact6: If that bewitching occurs then that the fact that that unpermissiveness does not occurs but this workingsing happens is right does not hold. fact7: The alluviation occurs. fact8: The fact that this bone happens and this syncategorematicness happens does not hold. fact9: The intertidalness occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That nonfunctionalness occurs if that bewitching occurs. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that that bewitching happens is true.; fact6 & assump1 -> int1: That that that unpermissiveness does not happens but this workingsing happens does not hold is not incorrect.; int1 & fact2 -> int2: That nonfunctionalness occurs.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This imp does enfeeble Lallans.

{B}{a}

fact1: The fact that somebody does not enlarge and she/he is not scentless does not hold if she/he is not a alinement. fact2: The fact that someone accumulates anapaest but he is not mandibular does not hold if he is not effortful. fact3: If this imp does not overstrain embryology then that this imp is prolate but this does not cop acantha does not hold. fact4: That this imp is both prolate and not a Physostigma is incorrect. fact5: that embryology does not overstrain imp. fact6: Some person enfeebles Lallans if it does cop acantha. fact7: If this imp does not overstrain embryology the fact that this imp is prolate and it cops acantha is incorrect. fact8: If this imp cops acantha it enfeebles Lallans. fact9: That the willowware is an inevitable but not an imprinting is incorrect. fact10: If the fact that this imp is not scentless is true the fact that this imp is collagenic thing that is not a Utrecht is incorrect. fact11: This confidante is effortful if that it does befoul and it does not overstrain embryology is wrong. fact12: If this imp is not a mammalogy then the fact that it is prolate and is not concentrical is not true. fact13: If that porphyrin does not overstrain embryology but it organises stylemark then this imp does not enfeeble Lallans. fact14: That this imp is prolate and it cops acantha is incorrect. fact15: This imp does not overstrain embryology.

fact1: (x): ¬{F}x -> ¬(¬{D}x & ¬{E}x) fact2: (x): ¬{FG}x -> ¬({FH}x & ¬{GB}x) fact3: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact4: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{DS}{a}) fact5: ¬{AC}{aa} fact6: (x): {AB}x -> {B}x fact7: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact8: {AB}{a} -> {B}{a} fact9: ¬({IH}{jg} & ¬{HL}{jg}) fact10: ¬{E}{a} -> ¬({JH}{a} & ¬{IQ}{a}) fact11: ¬({DT}{gs} & ¬{A}{gs}) -> {FG}{gs} fact12: ¬{DA}{a} -> ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{BG}{a}) fact13: (¬{A}{b} & {C}{b}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact14: ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact15: ¬{A}{a}

This imp does not enfeeble Lallans.

¬{B}{a}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that somebody does not enlarge and she/he is not scentless does not hold if she/he is not a alinement. fact2: The fact that someone accumulates anapaest but he is not mandibular does not hold if he is not effortful. fact3: If this imp does not overstrain embryology then that this imp is prolate but this does not cop acantha does not hold. fact4: That this imp is both prolate and not a Physostigma is incorrect. fact5: that embryology does not overstrain imp. fact6: Some person enfeebles Lallans if it does cop acantha. fact7: If this imp does not overstrain embryology the fact that this imp is prolate and it cops acantha is incorrect. fact8: If this imp cops acantha it enfeebles Lallans. fact9: That the willowware is an inevitable but not an imprinting is incorrect. fact10: If the fact that this imp is not scentless is true the fact that this imp is collagenic thing that is not a Utrecht is incorrect. fact11: This confidante is effortful if that it does befoul and it does not overstrain embryology is wrong. fact12: If this imp is not a mammalogy then the fact that it is prolate and is not concentrical is not true. fact13: If that porphyrin does not overstrain embryology but it organises stylemark then this imp does not enfeeble Lallans. fact14: That this imp is prolate and it cops acantha is incorrect. fact15: This imp does not overstrain embryology. ; $hypothesis$ = This imp does enfeeble Lallans. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

The fact that everything is a Priscoan is wrong.

¬((x): {A}x)

fact1: Everything is dialectic. fact2: Every man is a tempering. fact3: Everything is a arrivederci. fact4: The fact that every person is diclinous hold. fact5: Every man assaults Eriophorum. fact6: Every man is a birdsong. fact7: Everybody is adoptive. fact8: Every man abounds. fact9: The fact that everything discriminates is correct. fact10: Everyone is proportionate. fact11: That everyone is unobliging is correct. fact12: The fact that everything is actinomycotic is not incorrect. fact13: Everything is a kind of a austereness.

fact1: (x): {BQ}x fact2: (x): {AM}x fact3: (x): {JK}x fact4: (x): {DF}x fact5: (x): {HP}x fact6: (x): {GJ}x fact7: (x): {BD}x fact8: (x): {HH}x fact9: (x): {K}x fact10: (x): {IR}x fact11: (x): {AS}x fact12: (x): {EO}x fact13: (x): {AN}x

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Everything is dialectic. fact2: Every man is a tempering. fact3: Everything is a arrivederci. fact4: The fact that every person is diclinous hold. fact5: Every man assaults Eriophorum. fact6: Every man is a birdsong. fact7: Everybody is adoptive. fact8: Every man abounds. fact9: The fact that everything discriminates is correct. fact10: Everyone is proportionate. fact11: That everyone is unobliging is correct. fact12: The fact that everything is actinomycotic is not incorrect. fact13: Everything is a kind of a austereness. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that everything is a Priscoan is wrong. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This sweats does not niggle dispensability.

¬{C}{c}

fact1: Something points memorisation and is a MRD if it does not niggle dispensability. fact2: If that either somebody is a MRD or the one does not point memorisation or both is wrong then the one does not niggle dispensability. fact3: If that some person is a surprised but not kafkaesque is false she is not an offstage. fact4: the memorisation points Cinderella. fact5: That that botanical niggles dispensability is true if that Cinderella is a MRD. fact6: If something is not a Punica but it shatters acciaccatura it is not a Benet. fact7: If that Cinderella does point memorisation that botanical is a kind of a MRD. fact8: The fact that something is a surprised and not kafkaesque is false if this is not a Benet. fact9: This sweats does not niggle dispensability if that that Cinderella is not a kind of an offstage and does not niggle dispensability is wrong. fact10: That Cinderella points memorisation. fact11: If something is not a kind of a neuropathy then this is not a Punica and this shatters acciaccatura. fact12: That Cinderella does niggle dispensability if this sweats points memorisation. fact13: Everything is not a neuropathy. fact14: If that Cinderella niggles dispensability then this sweats points memorisation.

fact1: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x & {B}x) fact2: (x): ¬({B}x v ¬{A}x) -> ¬{C}x fact3: (x): ¬({E}x & ¬{F}x) -> ¬{D}x fact4: {AA}{aa} fact5: {B}{a} -> {C}{b} fact6: (x): (¬{H}x & {I}x) -> ¬{G}x fact7: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} fact8: (x): ¬{G}x -> ¬({E}x & ¬{F}x) fact9: ¬(¬{D}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> ¬{C}{c} fact10: {A}{a} fact11: (x): ¬{J}x -> (¬{H}x & {I}x) fact12: {A}{c} -> {C}{a} fact13: (x): ¬{J}x fact14: {C}{a} -> {A}{c}

This sweats does not niggle dispensability.

¬{C}{c}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Something points memorisation and is a MRD if it does not niggle dispensability. fact2: If that either somebody is a MRD or the one does not point memorisation or both is wrong then the one does not niggle dispensability. fact3: If that some person is a surprised but not kafkaesque is false she is not an offstage. fact4: the memorisation points Cinderella. fact5: That that botanical niggles dispensability is true if that Cinderella is a MRD. fact6: If something is not a Punica but it shatters acciaccatura it is not a Benet. fact7: If that Cinderella does point memorisation that botanical is a kind of a MRD. fact8: The fact that something is a surprised and not kafkaesque is false if this is not a Benet. fact9: This sweats does not niggle dispensability if that that Cinderella is not a kind of an offstage and does not niggle dispensability is wrong. fact10: That Cinderella points memorisation. fact11: If something is not a kind of a neuropathy then this is not a Punica and this shatters acciaccatura. fact12: That Cinderella does niggle dispensability if this sweats points memorisation. fact13: Everything is not a neuropathy. fact14: If that Cinderella niggles dispensability then this sweats points memorisation. ; $hypothesis$ = This sweats does not niggle dispensability. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This assumption does not happens but that subordinating Gainsborough occurs.

(¬{A} & {C})

fact1: That conflagration does not happens if that both that conflagration and that Highlander happens is incorrect. fact2: This assumption does not occurs and this spoonfeeding does not occurs. fact3: The non-serologicalness and this redecorating Stomatopoda occurs. fact4: That courteousness does not occurs but that subordinating Gainsborough happens.

fact1: ¬({AE} & {E}) -> ¬{AE} fact2: (¬{A} & ¬{B}) fact3: (¬{ER} & {GA}) fact4: (¬{D} & {C})

That conflagration does not occurs and this entangling Macedonia does not happens.

(¬{AE} & ¬{EF})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That conflagration does not happens if that both that conflagration and that Highlander happens is incorrect. fact2: This assumption does not occurs and this spoonfeeding does not occurs. fact3: The non-serologicalness and this redecorating Stomatopoda occurs. fact4: That courteousness does not occurs but that subordinating Gainsborough happens. ; $hypothesis$ = This assumption does not happens but that subordinating Gainsborough occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact2 -> int1: This assumption does not happens.; fact4 -> int2: That subordinating Gainsborough occurs.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That everyone is not a Respighi and is not a clipping is right.

(x): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x)

fact1: That something punts unrestraint but it does not darken badinage does not hold if it does not intersect. fact2: That everyone is not a Respighi and is not a clipping is right. fact3: Something is a kind of a parapsychology if the fact that it is infectious or it is not Mishnaic or both is wrong. fact4: Something is not a Mohammad and is not R.C. if this thing is a parapsychology. fact5: Every person does not nett surprising. fact6: Everything is not a Respighi. fact7: Everything is not a mutchkin and it does not ADD symmetricalness. fact8: If that something punts unrestraint but it does not darken badinage is false it does hex Bragi. fact9: That everything is not a OPEC and this thing is not unassigned hold. fact10: The fact that something is a frothing and does intersect is false if it does not nett surprising. fact11: If that somebody is a froone that intersects does not hold he/she does not intersects. fact12: If something hexes Bragi that this thing is infectious and/or not Mishnaic is wrong.

fact1: (x): ¬{G}x -> ¬({E}x & ¬{F}x) fact2: (x): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact3: (x): ¬({C}x v ¬{B}x) -> {A}x fact4: (x): {A}x -> (¬{HH}x & ¬{DU}x) fact5: (x): ¬{H}x fact6: (x): ¬{AA}x fact7: (x): (¬{DD}x & ¬{CD}x) fact8: (x): ¬({E}x & ¬{F}x) -> {D}x fact9: (x): (¬{FJ}x & ¬{EO}x) fact10: (x): ¬{H}x -> ¬({I}x & {G}x) fact11: (x): ¬({I}x & {G}x) -> ¬{G}x fact12: (x): {D}x -> ¬({C}x v ¬{B}x)

Everything is not a Mohammad and it is not R.C.

(x): (¬{HH}x & ¬{DU}x)

PROVED

PROVED

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: That something punts unrestraint but it does not darken badinage does not hold if it does not intersect. fact2: That everyone is not a Respighi and is not a clipping is right. fact3: Something is a kind of a parapsychology if the fact that it is infectious or it is not Mishnaic or both is wrong. fact4: Something is not a Mohammad and is not R.C. if this thing is a parapsychology. fact5: Every person does not nett surprising. fact6: Everything is not a Respighi. fact7: Everything is not a mutchkin and it does not ADD symmetricalness. fact8: If that something punts unrestraint but it does not darken badinage is false it does hex Bragi. fact9: That everything is not a OPEC and this thing is not unassigned hold. fact10: The fact that something is a frothing and does intersect is false if it does not nett surprising. fact11: If that somebody is a froone that intersects does not hold he/she does not intersects. fact12: If something hexes Bragi that this thing is infectious and/or not Mishnaic is wrong. ; $hypothesis$ = That everyone is not a Respighi and is not a clipping is right. ; $proof$ =

fact2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This repechage does not occurs.

¬{A}

fact1: This syncopating skulduggery happens. fact2: That arrival occurs if the banded occurs but that bleaching does not happens. fact3: This tankage occurs. fact4: Both that whimpering Malebranche and this tankage happens if that arrival does not occurs. fact5: If that arrival occurs notthis repechage but this tankage happens. fact6: If that bleaching does not occurs this repechage happens and this White occurs. fact7: That bingle occurs. fact8: That that arrival occurs is prevented by that the banded does not happens. fact9: That that bingle and this syncopating skulduggery happens results in that the banded does not occurs.

fact1: {G} fact2: ({E} & ¬{D}) -> {C} fact3: {B} fact4: ¬{C} -> ({HL} & {B}) fact5: {C} -> (¬{A} & {B}) fact6: ¬{D} -> ({A} & {EF}) fact7: {H} fact8: ¬{E} -> ¬{C} fact9: ({H} & {G}) -> ¬{E}

This repechage does not occurs.

¬{A}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This syncopating skulduggery happens. fact2: That arrival occurs if the banded occurs but that bleaching does not happens. fact3: This tankage occurs. fact4: Both that whimpering Malebranche and this tankage happens if that arrival does not occurs. fact5: If that arrival occurs notthis repechage but this tankage happens. fact6: If that bleaching does not occurs this repechage happens and this White occurs. fact7: That bingle occurs. fact8: That that arrival occurs is prevented by that the banded does not happens. fact9: That that bingle and this syncopating skulduggery happens results in that the banded does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = This repechage does not occurs. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That the fact that Cliff juggles goodwill and this person irons Comte is correct is false.

¬({C}{a} & {B}{a})

fact1: If Cliff stabilizes Fagopyrum then Cliff juggles goodwill. fact2: Cliff is a kind of a Tobey. fact3: If something is not a kind of a Tobey the fact that the thing juggles goodwill and the thing irons Comte is incorrect. fact4: Something that is disadvantageous is expressible. fact5: That gastrin is unexhausted and disadvantageous if that cuirass is not inhumed. fact6: that Fagopyrum stabilizes Cliff. fact7: That cuirass is not inhumed if that quat is inhumed and that is a mem. fact8: That that Fauve is not a Tobey but it irons Comte is wrong. fact9: That quat does not validate appoggiatura but it is a hap if it does not thrombose. fact10: That acebutolol capsizes idiocy if there is some man such that the fact that this one is not a Tobey and does iron Comte is incorrect. fact11: Something that does not validate appoggiatura is inhumed and a mem. fact12: The candida does juggle goodwill. fact13: Cliff stabilizes Fagopyrum. fact14: Cliff undoes. fact15: Cliff is a Tobey that does iron Comte. fact16: The fact that that Fauve does not stabilize Fagopyrum and it does not ride nuance is not correct if that gastrin is expressible. fact17: That Cliff is not a Tobey is true if that that Fauve does not stabilize Fagopyrum and does not ride nuance does not hold.

fact1: {D}{a} -> {C}{a} fact2: {A}{a} fact3: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({C}x & {B}x) fact4: (x): {G}x -> {F}x fact5: ¬{I}{d} -> ({H}{c} & {G}{c}) fact6: {AC}{ac} fact7: ({I}{e} & {K}{e}) -> ¬{I}{d} fact8: ¬(¬{A}{b} & {B}{b}) fact9: ¬{M}{e} -> (¬{J}{e} & {L}{e}) fact10: (x): ¬(¬{A}x & {B}x) -> {T}{il} fact11: (x): ¬{J}x -> ({I}x & {K}x) fact12: {C}{bb} fact13: {D}{a} fact14: {IK}{a} fact15: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact16: {F}{c} -> ¬(¬{D}{b} & ¬{E}{b}) fact17: ¬(¬{D}{b} & ¬{E}{b}) -> ¬{A}{a}

That acebutolol capsizes idiocy and it stabilizes Fagopyrum.

({T}{il} & {D}{il})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If Cliff stabilizes Fagopyrum then Cliff juggles goodwill. fact2: Cliff is a kind of a Tobey. fact3: If something is not a kind of a Tobey the fact that the thing juggles goodwill and the thing irons Comte is incorrect. fact4: Something that is disadvantageous is expressible. fact5: That gastrin is unexhausted and disadvantageous if that cuirass is not inhumed. fact6: that Fagopyrum stabilizes Cliff. fact7: That cuirass is not inhumed if that quat is inhumed and that is a mem. fact8: That that Fauve is not a Tobey but it irons Comte is wrong. fact9: That quat does not validate appoggiatura but it is a hap if it does not thrombose. fact10: That acebutolol capsizes idiocy if there is some man such that the fact that this one is not a Tobey and does iron Comte is incorrect. fact11: Something that does not validate appoggiatura is inhumed and a mem. fact12: The candida does juggle goodwill. fact13: Cliff stabilizes Fagopyrum. fact14: Cliff undoes. fact15: Cliff is a Tobey that does iron Comte. fact16: The fact that that Fauve does not stabilize Fagopyrum and it does not ride nuance is not correct if that gastrin is expressible. fact17: That Cliff is not a Tobey is true if that that Fauve does not stabilize Fagopyrum and does not ride nuance does not hold. ; $hypothesis$ = That the fact that Cliff juggles goodwill and this person irons Comte is correct is false. ; $proof$ =

fact15 -> int1: Cliff irons Comte.; fact13 & fact1 -> int2: Cliff juggles goodwill.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That this washerwoman is not a claxon is right.

¬{B}{a}

fact1: Some person that does not apprentice Rehnquist is not a claxon but a Harrod. fact2: This washerwoman is a Rasmussen. fact3: This washerwoman is a Harrod that is spermous. fact4: If that lifeline does apprentice Rehnquist then this washerwoman does not apprentice Rehnquist. fact5: The Jeffersonian is a kind of a Harrod. fact6: The orache is a kind of a counterrevolutionary and the one is a advowson. fact7: This washerwoman compresses and is a Harrod. fact8: That prosimian is a claxon if that prosimian is a Romanism. fact9: That prosimian is a Romanism. fact10: This washerwoman teases Elagatis. fact11: The trekker is a endemism and contacts Monera. fact12: This washerwoman is both a Harrod and a claxon. fact13: This washerwoman is a Harrod. fact14: This washerwoman plays Solanum. fact15: Something is a Nilsson if the fact that this is not a Nilsson and this does not apprentice Rehnquist does not hold. fact16: This gentleman is a kind of a Harrod and is a kind of a hostile.

fact1: (x): ¬{C}x -> (¬{B}x & {A}x) fact2: {GA}{a} fact3: ({A}{a} & {DC}{a}) fact4: {C}{b} -> ¬{C}{a} fact5: {A}{jc} fact6: ({IB}{fc} & {ER}{fc}) fact7: ({HI}{a} & {A}{a}) fact8: {D}{hk} -> {B}{hk} fact9: {D}{hk} fact10: {ID}{a} fact11: ({GH}{cg} & {DS}{cg}) fact12: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact13: {A}{a} fact14: {CL}{a} fact15: (x): ¬(¬{IQ}x & ¬{C}x) -> {IQ}x fact16: ({A}{bu} & {IT}{bu})

That this washerwoman is not a claxon is right.

¬{B}{a}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Some person that does not apprentice Rehnquist is not a claxon but a Harrod. fact2: This washerwoman is a Rasmussen. fact3: This washerwoman is a Harrod that is spermous. fact4: If that lifeline does apprentice Rehnquist then this washerwoman does not apprentice Rehnquist. fact5: The Jeffersonian is a kind of a Harrod. fact6: The orache is a kind of a counterrevolutionary and the one is a advowson. fact7: This washerwoman compresses and is a Harrod. fact8: That prosimian is a claxon if that prosimian is a Romanism. fact9: That prosimian is a Romanism. fact10: This washerwoman teases Elagatis. fact11: The trekker is a endemism and contacts Monera. fact12: This washerwoman is both a Harrod and a claxon. fact13: This washerwoman is a Harrod. fact14: This washerwoman plays Solanum. fact15: Something is a Nilsson if the fact that this is not a Nilsson and this does not apprentice Rehnquist does not hold. fact16: This gentleman is a kind of a Harrod and is a kind of a hostile. ; $hypothesis$ = That this washerwoman is not a claxon is right. ; $proof$ =

fact12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

The fact that this uke is not unalienable but this person is a belling is false.

¬(¬{C}{a} & {D}{a})

fact1: If there is something such that that either it is unalienable or it is a kind of an external or both is wrong then this Court is an external. fact2: That this uke is not a manoeuvrability and it is not a belling does not hold. fact3: The fact that this uke is not an epilogue and the one is not a Clive does not hold if this uke is a kind of an external. fact4: If this uke is a Clive then it is a Grotius. fact5: Some man that is defeasible abnegates disarray. fact6: If the fact that some person is not an epilogue and is not a Clive does not hold then she is a Hz. fact7: The fact that Danilo begrimeds but that thing is not a racking is incorrect if that thing disfavors. fact8: This chemist's is not a kind of a belling and is a kinanesthesia. fact9: That satsuma is a kind of an external. fact10: This uke dangles. fact11: That this uke is unalienable and is not a Kettering is wrong. fact12: If somebody is a Hz then he is not unalienable and he is a kind of a belling. fact13: If this uke transmutes this uke is an epilogue. fact14: If some person transplants Limulidae it is polar. fact15: This uke is a kind of an external.

fact1: (x): ¬({C}x v {A}x) -> {A}{cg} fact2: ¬(¬{DH}{a} & ¬{D}{a}) fact3: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact4: {AB}{a} -> {DU}{a} fact5: (x): {AM}x -> {HC}x fact6: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x fact7: {IP}{jh} -> ¬({BP}{jh} & ¬{CK}{jh}) fact8: (¬{D}{ea} & {HE}{ea}) fact9: {A}{if} fact10: {EB}{a} fact11: ¬({C}{a} & ¬{AE}{a}) fact12: (x): {B}x -> (¬{C}x & {D}x) fact13: {AP}{a} -> {AA}{a} fact14: (x): {FP}x -> {AQ}x fact15: {A}{a}

This Court is a kind of a Clive.

{AB}{cg}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If there is something such that that either it is unalienable or it is a kind of an external or both is wrong then this Court is an external. fact2: That this uke is not a manoeuvrability and it is not a belling does not hold. fact3: The fact that this uke is not an epilogue and the one is not a Clive does not hold if this uke is a kind of an external. fact4: If this uke is a Clive then it is a Grotius. fact5: Some man that is defeasible abnegates disarray. fact6: If the fact that some person is not an epilogue and is not a Clive does not hold then she is a Hz. fact7: The fact that Danilo begrimeds but that thing is not a racking is incorrect if that thing disfavors. fact8: This chemist's is not a kind of a belling and is a kinanesthesia. fact9: That satsuma is a kind of an external. fact10: This uke dangles. fact11: That this uke is unalienable and is not a Kettering is wrong. fact12: If somebody is a Hz then he is not unalienable and he is a kind of a belling. fact13: If this uke transmutes this uke is an epilogue. fact14: If some person transplants Limulidae it is polar. fact15: This uke is a kind of an external. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that this uke is not unalienable but this person is a belling is false. ; $proof$ =

fact3 & fact15 -> int1: The fact that this uke is both not an epilogue and not a Clive is false.; fact6 -> int2: This uke is a kind of a Hz if that this uke is not an epilogue and it is not a Clive does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This uke is a Hz.; fact12 -> int4: This uke is non-unalienable thing that is a belling if this uke is a Hz.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This jezebel does not cabin 11.

¬{B}{aa}

fact1: If something that is not a kind of a homogeny does not regiment the fact that that cabins 11 is wrong. fact2: If someone that is not a homogeny regiments then this one does not cabin 11. fact3: That workstation is a kind of a Anaximander if the ammonium is a antiquarian that is not a Anaximander. fact4: This jezebel is not a kind of an east if this jezebel is abstract. fact5: That this jezebel is not abstract and does not gentle unease does not hold. fact6: This jezebel is not an east if that this jezebel is non-abstract thing that does not gentle unease is incorrect. fact7: If some person is a kind of a homogeny and does not regiment then it does not cabin 11. fact8: That Ron is not a kind of a Minuartia hold if that the Chartreuse is not a Minuartia but fleshy is false. fact9: That this jezebel is abstract but that thing does not gentle unease does not hold. fact10: If the fact that that workstation is a Anaximander hold then this browallia is Siouan. fact11: If somebody does not asterisk 22 and is a parked that it does not gentle unease is correct. fact12: Ron squalls Chattahoochee and is a Dukas if Ron is not a kind of a Minuartia. fact13: The fact that this jezebel does not gentle unease is not incorrect if this gagman does not gentle unease and is abstract. fact14: This kittiwake does not gentle unease. fact15: The ammonium is a kind of a antiquarian and is not a Anaximander. fact16: This gagman does not asterisk 22 and is a kind of a parked if something is a Dukas. fact17: If something does not gentle unease this cabins 11 and this is an east. fact18: That some person is not a homogeny and it does not regiment if it is not an east hold. fact19: The fact that the Chartreuse is both not a Minuartia and fleshy does not hold. fact20: If this jezebel is a kind of a homogeny that does not regiment then that this jezebel does not cabin 11 hold. fact21: The fact that this jezebel does not cabin 11 is true if this jezebel is not a homogeny but this one regiments. fact22: Somebody that does not regiment is both not abstract and not a homogeny. fact23: Somebody is not a Salix and does not ratchet Maugham if it is endothelial. fact24: Somebody is endothelial if it is Siouan.

fact1: (x): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x fact2: (x): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x fact3: ({P}{f} & ¬{N}{f}) -> {N}{e} fact4: {D}{aa} -> ¬{A}{aa} fact5: ¬(¬{D}{aa} & ¬{C}{aa}) fact6: ¬(¬{D}{aa} & ¬{C}{aa}) -> ¬{A}{aa} fact7: (x): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x fact8: ¬(¬{L}{d} & {O}{d}) -> ¬{L}{c} fact9: ¬({D}{aa} & ¬{C}{aa}) fact10: {N}{e} -> {M}{b} fact11: (x): (¬{H}x & {G}x) -> ¬{C}x fact12: ¬{L}{c} -> ({K}{c} & {I}{c}) fact13: (¬{C}{a} & {D}{a}) -> ¬{C}{aa} fact14: ¬{C}{p} fact15: ({P}{f} & ¬{N}{f}) fact16: (x): {I}x -> (¬{H}{a} & {G}{a}) fact17: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({B}x & {A}x) fact18: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact19: ¬(¬{L}{d} & {O}{d}) fact20: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} fact21: (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} fact22: (x): ¬{AB}x -> (¬{D}x & ¬{AA}x) fact23: (x): {J}x -> (¬{F}x & ¬{E}x) fact24: (x): {M}x -> {J}x

This jezebel cabins 11.

{B}{aa}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If something that is not a kind of a homogeny does not regiment the fact that that cabins 11 is wrong. fact2: If someone that is not a homogeny regiments then this one does not cabin 11. fact3: That workstation is a kind of a Anaximander if the ammonium is a antiquarian that is not a Anaximander. fact4: This jezebel is not a kind of an east if this jezebel is abstract. fact5: That this jezebel is not abstract and does not gentle unease does not hold. fact6: This jezebel is not an east if that this jezebel is non-abstract thing that does not gentle unease is incorrect. fact7: If some person is a kind of a homogeny and does not regiment then it does not cabin 11. fact8: That Ron is not a kind of a Minuartia hold if that the Chartreuse is not a Minuartia but fleshy is false. fact9: That this jezebel is abstract but that thing does not gentle unease does not hold. fact10: If the fact that that workstation is a Anaximander hold then this browallia is Siouan. fact11: If somebody does not asterisk 22 and is a parked that it does not gentle unease is correct. fact12: Ron squalls Chattahoochee and is a Dukas if Ron is not a kind of a Minuartia. fact13: The fact that this jezebel does not gentle unease is not incorrect if this gagman does not gentle unease and is abstract. fact14: This kittiwake does not gentle unease. fact15: The ammonium is a kind of a antiquarian and is not a Anaximander. fact16: This gagman does not asterisk 22 and is a kind of a parked if something is a Dukas. fact17: If something does not gentle unease this cabins 11 and this is an east. fact18: That some person is not a homogeny and it does not regiment if it is not an east hold. fact19: The fact that the Chartreuse is both not a Minuartia and fleshy does not hold. fact20: If this jezebel is a kind of a homogeny that does not regiment then that this jezebel does not cabin 11 hold. fact21: The fact that this jezebel does not cabin 11 is true if this jezebel is not a homogeny but this one regiments. fact22: Somebody that does not regiment is both not abstract and not a homogeny. fact23: Somebody is not a Salix and does not ratchet Maugham if it is endothelial. fact24: Somebody is endothelial if it is Siouan. ; $hypothesis$ = This jezebel does not cabin 11. ; $proof$ =

fact18 -> int1: This jezebel is not a homogeny and does not regiment if she is not a kind of an east.; fact5 & fact6 -> int2: This jezebel is not an east.; int1 & int2 -> int3: The fact that this jezebel is not a homogeny and it does not regiment is correct.; fact1 -> int4: If this jezebel is not a homogeny and does not regiment then it does not cabin 11.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

Bruno is a Papuan that is amoeboid.

({A}{a} & {B}{a})

fact1: There exists some man such that that that either it is a Papuan or it is amoeboid or both is true does not hold. fact2: If that hombre is both not amoeboid and immunocompetent then Bruno is not a Papuan. fact3: If there exists something such that that it either is papal or is a kind of a Goodyera or both does not hold then Bruno is a kind of a Papuan. fact4: That hombre is amoeboid. fact5: There exists some person such that either it is not papal or it is a Goodyera or both. fact6: There exists something such that that is papal. fact7: There is some person such that the fact that it is either not papal or a Goodyera or both does not hold. fact8: Bruno is amoeboid if that hombre is amoeboid. fact9: There exists some person such that the one is not amoeboid. fact10: That either some person is not a similarity or it is a kind of a ultimacy or both is wrong if it is not a Papuan.

fact1: (Ex): ¬({A}x v {B}x) fact2: (¬{B}{b} & {C}{b}) -> ¬{A}{a} fact3: (x): ¬({AA}x v {AB}x) -> {A}{a} fact4: {B}{b} fact5: (Ex): (¬{AA}x v {AB}x) fact6: (Ex): {AA}x fact7: (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x v {AB}x) fact8: {B}{b} -> {B}{a} fact9: (Ex): ¬{B}x fact10: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{JF}x v {CQ}x)

There exists someone such that that she is not a similarity or a ultimacy or both is false.

(Ex): ¬(¬{JF}x v {CQ}x)

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: There exists some man such that that that either it is a Papuan or it is amoeboid or both is true does not hold. fact2: If that hombre is both not amoeboid and immunocompetent then Bruno is not a Papuan. fact3: If there exists something such that that it either is papal or is a kind of a Goodyera or both does not hold then Bruno is a kind of a Papuan. fact4: That hombre is amoeboid. fact5: There exists some person such that either it is not papal or it is a Goodyera or both. fact6: There exists something such that that is papal. fact7: There is some person such that the fact that it is either not papal or a Goodyera or both does not hold. fact8: Bruno is amoeboid if that hombre is amoeboid. fact9: There exists some person such that the one is not amoeboid. fact10: That either some person is not a similarity or it is a kind of a ultimacy or both is wrong if it is not a Papuan. ; $hypothesis$ = Bruno is a Papuan that is amoeboid. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

The fact that this abutment is not hyaloplasmic is right.

¬{B}{a}

fact1: If that this abutment does not destabilize and/or the thing is a Pythoninae does not hold then the thing is a antineoplastic. fact2: The fact that this abutment either is inanimate or is not antitypic or both does not hold. fact3: If that this abutment is not a Cline and/or is not a dreadfulness is false then this abutment springs. fact4: If the fact that either some person is unpatronized or the person does not degrease ungraciousness or both is false then the person fires dengue. fact5: If the fact that some person vanishes neglected and/or this person is not unhearable is false then the fact that this person is a counterfactuality hold. fact6: If the fact that the fact that something springs and/or that is non-hyaloplasmic is correct is wrong then that is a antineoplastic. fact7: Some person is hyaloplasmic and springs if that one does not realise anapaest. fact8: This abutment is not acceptive if that it is non-bituminous and it is acceptive is incorrect. fact9: The lepidomelane is a Megaptera if the fact that this is hyaloplasmic or is not a Arrhenius or both is wrong. fact10: The lapin is a former if the fact that either this is a gage or this is not slow or both is incorrect. fact11: This abutment is a antineoplastic. fact12: The fact that this Jnr does not graven grin and/or does not whitewash Lipotyphla does not hold. fact13: Something does realise anapaest and is cormous if it is not acceptive. fact14: If this abutment does spring then the fact that either this abutment does not play carful or this one is not a antineoplastic or both is wrong. fact15: If the fact that something either does not play carful or is not a antineoplastic or both is false then it is hyaloplasmic. fact16: If the fact that some man either is a antineoplastic or does not play carful or both is incorrect it springs. fact17: That the fact that this abutment does not ovulate or the person does not field squeaking or both is wrong hold if this abutment is a antineoplastic. fact18: This abutment springs. fact19: This skulker is not non-hyaloplasmic. fact20: This abutment vanishes neglected. fact21: This abutment is hyaloplasmic if that it does not play carful and/or is a antineoplastic is false. fact22: The fact that either this abutment is not an indaba or it is not a antineoplastic or both is not right. fact23: If the fact that this abutment is a peg and/or it is not a pailful is not right it plays carful.

fact1: ¬(¬{HP}{a} v {FP}{a}) -> {AB}{a} fact2: ¬(¬{BT}{a} v ¬{BS}{a}) fact3: ¬(¬{EI}{a} v ¬{EF}{a}) -> {A}{a} fact4: (x): ¬({CH}x v ¬{JF}x) -> {M}x fact5: (x): ¬({GO}x v ¬{IG}x) -> {IM}x fact6: (x): ¬({A}x v ¬{B}x) -> {AB}x fact7: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({B}x & {A}x) fact8: ¬(¬{G}{a} & {E}{a}) -> ¬{E}{a} fact9: ¬({B}{jk} v ¬{GK}{jk}) -> {IQ}{jk} fact10: ¬({GI}{in} v ¬{EB}{in}) -> {AI}{in} fact11: {AB}{a} fact12: ¬(¬{BF}{jj} v ¬{EE}{jj}) fact13: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({C}x & {D}x) fact14: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) fact15: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x fact16: (x): ¬({AB}x v ¬{AA}x) -> {A}x fact17: {AB}{a} -> ¬(¬{HE}{a} v ¬{FM}{a}) fact18: {A}{a} fact19: {B}{ar} fact20: {GO}{a} fact21: ¬(¬{AA}{a} v {AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} fact22: ¬(¬{GU}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) fact23: ¬({ER}{a} v ¬{FQ}{a}) -> {AA}{a}

This halter is hyaloplasmic.

{B}{cc}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that this abutment does not destabilize and/or the thing is a Pythoninae does not hold then the thing is a antineoplastic. fact2: The fact that this abutment either is inanimate or is not antitypic or both does not hold. fact3: If that this abutment is not a Cline and/or is not a dreadfulness is false then this abutment springs. fact4: If the fact that either some person is unpatronized or the person does not degrease ungraciousness or both is false then the person fires dengue. fact5: If the fact that some person vanishes neglected and/or this person is not unhearable is false then the fact that this person is a counterfactuality hold. fact6: If the fact that the fact that something springs and/or that is non-hyaloplasmic is correct is wrong then that is a antineoplastic. fact7: Some person is hyaloplasmic and springs if that one does not realise anapaest. fact8: This abutment is not acceptive if that it is non-bituminous and it is acceptive is incorrect. fact9: The lepidomelane is a Megaptera if the fact that this is hyaloplasmic or is not a Arrhenius or both is wrong. fact10: The lapin is a former if the fact that either this is a gage or this is not slow or both is incorrect. fact11: This abutment is a antineoplastic. fact12: The fact that this Jnr does not graven grin and/or does not whitewash Lipotyphla does not hold. fact13: Something does realise anapaest and is cormous if it is not acceptive. fact14: If this abutment does spring then the fact that either this abutment does not play carful or this one is not a antineoplastic or both is wrong. fact15: If the fact that something either does not play carful or is not a antineoplastic or both is false then it is hyaloplasmic. fact16: If the fact that some man either is a antineoplastic or does not play carful or both is incorrect it springs. fact17: That the fact that this abutment does not ovulate or the person does not field squeaking or both is wrong hold if this abutment is a antineoplastic. fact18: This abutment springs. fact19: This skulker is not non-hyaloplasmic. fact20: This abutment vanishes neglected. fact21: This abutment is hyaloplasmic if that it does not play carful and/or is a antineoplastic is false. fact22: The fact that either this abutment is not an indaba or it is not a antineoplastic or both is not right. fact23: If the fact that this abutment is a peg and/or it is not a pailful is not right it plays carful. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that this abutment is not hyaloplasmic is right. ; $proof$ =

fact14 & fact18 -> int1: The fact that this abutment does not play carful and/or is not a antineoplastic is wrong.; fact15 -> int2: If the fact that this abutment does not play carful and/or is not a antineoplastic does not hold it is hyaloplasmic.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That tiler is not a kind of a shamefulness.

¬{D}{b}

fact1: That recreant is a Shona if the fact that that peludoes not overhaul EAS but the one is a kind of a Togolese is false. fact2: There exists somebody such that he/she is not nonfissile. fact3: That that tiler is a shamefulness is not incorrect if that this victualler is dicotyledonous but it is not a mediety is incorrect. fact4: The fact that that that tiler is a shamefulness and he/she is dicotyledonous is wrong is right. fact5: That secobarbital is not a Elymus if this anthropogeny is a Swanson. fact6: If something does not refuel ratio then that thing gallops Carrere and that thing is a phraseology. fact7: That tiler is not nonfissile. fact8: That tiler is not a shamefulness if this victualler is not dicotyledonous. fact9: The fact that this victualler is a shamefulness that is nonfissile does not hold. fact10: There exists something such that it is not a kind of a mediety. fact11: There exists something such that this is a mediety. fact12: If this anthropogeny is a Elymus then that secobarbital is not a kind of a Elymus. fact13: If that secobarbital does not pinch Mazatlan then that streptomyces is a branchiopod and it is a burke. fact14: That tiler is not a shamefulness if the fact that this victualler is dicotyledonous and it is not fissile is incorrect. fact15: Somebody is a Elymus and/or is a Swanson if that person is non-hematic. fact16: The peludo deserves WordNet. fact17: Something refuels ratio and is not a blond if it is a kind of a Shona. fact18: If that recreant refuels ratio and is not a blond then that streptomyces does not refuels ratio. fact19: The fact that this victualler is not non-dicotyledonous and that person is nonfissile does not hold if somebody is not a kind of a mediety. fact20: This anthropogeny is not hematic. fact21: The fact that some man does not overhaul EAS but it is a kind of a Togolese is wrong if the fact that it deserves WordNet is true. fact22: If that that rampion is not nonfissile hold that this victualler is both not non-dicotyledonous and not a mediety is wrong. fact23: Something does not pinch Mazatlan if this thing is not a kind of a Elymus.

fact1: ¬(¬{N}{g} & {M}{g}) -> {J}{e} fact2: (Ex): ¬{C}x fact3: ¬({B}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) -> {D}{b} fact4: ¬({D}{b} & {B}{b}) fact5: {Q}{h} -> ¬{O}{f} fact6: (x): ¬{I}x -> ({F}x & {G}x) fact7: ¬{C}{b} fact8: ¬{B}{a} -> ¬{D}{b} fact9: ¬({D}{a} & {C}{a}) fact10: (Ex): ¬{A}x fact11: (Ex): {A}x fact12: {O}{h} -> ¬{O}{f} fact13: ¬{L}{f} -> ({E}{d} & {H}{d}) fact14: ¬({B}{a} & {C}{a}) -> ¬{D}{b} fact15: (x): ¬{R}x -> ({O}x v {Q}x) fact16: {P}{g} fact17: (x): {J}x -> ({I}x & ¬{K}x) fact18: ({I}{e} & ¬{K}{e}) -> ¬{I}{d} fact19: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({B}{a} & {C}{a}) fact20: ¬{R}{h} fact21: (x): {P}x -> ¬(¬{N}x & {M}x) fact22: ¬{C}{c} -> ¬({B}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) fact23: (x): ¬{O}x -> ¬{L}x

The fact that that tiler is a shamefulness hold.

{D}{b}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That recreant is a Shona if the fact that that peludoes not overhaul EAS but the one is a kind of a Togolese is false. fact2: There exists somebody such that he/she is not nonfissile. fact3: That that tiler is a shamefulness is not incorrect if that this victualler is dicotyledonous but it is not a mediety is incorrect. fact4: The fact that that that tiler is a shamefulness and he/she is dicotyledonous is wrong is right. fact5: That secobarbital is not a Elymus if this anthropogeny is a Swanson. fact6: If something does not refuel ratio then that thing gallops Carrere and that thing is a phraseology. fact7: That tiler is not nonfissile. fact8: That tiler is not a shamefulness if this victualler is not dicotyledonous. fact9: The fact that this victualler is a shamefulness that is nonfissile does not hold. fact10: There exists something such that it is not a kind of a mediety. fact11: There exists something such that this is a mediety. fact12: If this anthropogeny is a Elymus then that secobarbital is not a kind of a Elymus. fact13: If that secobarbital does not pinch Mazatlan then that streptomyces is a branchiopod and it is a burke. fact14: That tiler is not a shamefulness if the fact that this victualler is dicotyledonous and it is not fissile is incorrect. fact15: Somebody is a Elymus and/or is a Swanson if that person is non-hematic. fact16: The peludo deserves WordNet. fact17: Something refuels ratio and is not a blond if it is a kind of a Shona. fact18: If that recreant refuels ratio and is not a blond then that streptomyces does not refuels ratio. fact19: The fact that this victualler is not non-dicotyledonous and that person is nonfissile does not hold if somebody is not a kind of a mediety. fact20: This anthropogeny is not hematic. fact21: The fact that some man does not overhaul EAS but it is a kind of a Togolese is wrong if the fact that it deserves WordNet is true. fact22: If that that rampion is not nonfissile hold that this victualler is both not non-dicotyledonous and not a mediety is wrong. fact23: Something does not pinch Mazatlan if this thing is not a kind of a Elymus. ; $hypothesis$ = That tiler is not a kind of a shamefulness. ; $proof$ =

fact10 & fact19 -> int1: The fact that that this victualler is dicotyledonous and this is nonfissile is wrong is correct.; int1 & fact14 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That darnel swamps diarrhoea.

{C}{c}

fact1: If something garnishees Salmonidae then it is not non-auxinic. fact2: The fact that the orangeade pits speckled and this person is monoatomic is incorrect. fact3: That this quadrangle is a kind of a Karlfeldt but this person does not bewhisker sigeh does not hold if Lea is pilosebaceous. fact4: If this owlclaws garnishees Salmonidae this quadrangle is auxinic. fact5: If this owlclaws swamps diarrhoea then this Butazolidin does garnishee Salmonidae. fact6: If that this owlclaws does not bewhisker sigeh is correct then this owlclaws garnishees Salmonidae and/or is auxinic. fact7: If the fact that the orangeade pits speckled and is monoatomic is incorrect then Lea does not pits speckled. fact8: That darnel swamps diarrhoea if this quadrangle is auxinic. fact9: This owlclaws does not bewhisker sigeh if that this quadrangle is a Karlfeldt that does not bewhisker sigeh is not right. fact10: If the fact that that darnel is a kind of a absentmindedness that is not a Liepaja is false then that this quadrangle is non-pilosebaceous hold. fact11: This perpendicular is auxinic. fact12: If that darnel is auxinic this quadrangle swamps diarrhoea. fact13: That something is a faineance but it is not a kind of a waving is not correct if it does not pit speckled. fact14: That darnel is not a faineance if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a faineance and is not a kind of a waving is incorrect. fact15: If someone is not a faineance then the fact that it is a absentmindedness and it is not a Liepaja is false. fact16: the fact that the Salmonidae garnishees owlclaws is not incorrect. fact17: The focalization does garnishee Salmonidae. fact18: Either something is a Karlfeldt or the thing does not bewhisker sigeh or both if the thing is not pilosebaceous. fact19: That tidbit is auxinic. fact20: That this quadrangle is undeciphered is correct.

fact1: (x): {A}x -> {B}x fact2: ¬({J}{e} & {M}{e}) fact3: {F}{d} -> ¬({E}{b} & ¬{D}{b}) fact4: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} fact5: {C}{a} -> {A}{ep} fact6: ¬{D}{a} -> ({A}{a} v {B}{a}) fact7: ¬({J}{e} & {M}{e}) -> ¬{J}{d} fact8: {B}{b} -> {C}{c} fact9: ¬({E}{b} & ¬{D}{b}) -> ¬{D}{a} fact10: ¬({G}{c} & ¬{H}{c}) -> ¬{F}{b} fact11: {B}{bs} fact12: {B}{c} -> {C}{b} fact13: (x): ¬{J}x -> ¬({I}x & ¬{K}x) fact14: (x): ¬({I}x & ¬{K}x) -> ¬{I}{c} fact15: (x): ¬{I}x -> ¬({G}x & ¬{H}x) fact16: {AA}{aa} fact17: {A}{aq} fact18: (x): ¬{F}x -> ({E}x v ¬{D}x) fact19: {B}{eh} fact20: {ES}{b}

This Butazolidin is auxinic.

{B}{ep}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If something garnishees Salmonidae then it is not non-auxinic. fact2: The fact that the orangeade pits speckled and this person is monoatomic is incorrect. fact3: That this quadrangle is a kind of a Karlfeldt but this person does not bewhisker sigeh does not hold if Lea is pilosebaceous. fact4: If this owlclaws garnishees Salmonidae this quadrangle is auxinic. fact5: If this owlclaws swamps diarrhoea then this Butazolidin does garnishee Salmonidae. fact6: If that this owlclaws does not bewhisker sigeh is correct then this owlclaws garnishees Salmonidae and/or is auxinic. fact7: If the fact that the orangeade pits speckled and is monoatomic is incorrect then Lea does not pits speckled. fact8: That darnel swamps diarrhoea if this quadrangle is auxinic. fact9: This owlclaws does not bewhisker sigeh if that this quadrangle is a Karlfeldt that does not bewhisker sigeh is not right. fact10: If the fact that that darnel is a kind of a absentmindedness that is not a Liepaja is false then that this quadrangle is non-pilosebaceous hold. fact11: This perpendicular is auxinic. fact12: If that darnel is auxinic this quadrangle swamps diarrhoea. fact13: That something is a faineance but it is not a kind of a waving is not correct if it does not pit speckled. fact14: That darnel is not a faineance if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a faineance and is not a kind of a waving is incorrect. fact15: If someone is not a faineance then the fact that it is a absentmindedness and it is not a Liepaja is false. fact16: the fact that the Salmonidae garnishees owlclaws is not incorrect. fact17: The focalization does garnishee Salmonidae. fact18: Either something is a Karlfeldt or the thing does not bewhisker sigeh or both if the thing is not pilosebaceous. fact19: That tidbit is auxinic. fact20: That this quadrangle is undeciphered is correct. ; $hypothesis$ = That darnel swamps diarrhoea. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That this gameboard is a kind of convertible one that does not ossify Cuculiformes does not hold.

¬({D}{b} & ¬{E}{b})

fact1: If this protohippus is not a kind of a dreaminess then the fact that this protohippus is convertible and the thing is balletic is wrong. fact2: If that this grind is balletic is right this gameboard is not balletic. fact3: Something is convertible if this thing is secretory. fact4: The cive is not a blot. fact5: Something is not carunculous and/or that is not a dreaminess if that is not a Pissis. fact6: If something that is not non-secretory is an increased it does not ossify Cuculiformes. fact7: That semiconductor does not sorrow Seaborg and that does not tip Dicotyledonae. fact8: Either something is an increased or it is secretory or both if it is not balletic. fact9: If that semiconductor is not a kind of a dreaminess then this protohippus is carunculous. fact10: This protohippus is not convertible if that it is convertible and it is balletic does not hold. fact11: That this protohippus does not discount credentials and is not a Robertson is incorrect if this protohippus is carunculous. fact12: The fact that somebody is convertible one that does not ossify Cuculiformes is wrong if that the one does not discount credentials hold. fact13: That buckaroo is secretory and it discounts credentials if this protohippus is not convertible. fact14: Someone is convertible if it is an increased. fact15: This protohippus is not non-secretory. fact16: If that semiconductor is not carunculous this protohippus is carunculous. fact17: If this protohippus is a kind of an increased and it is secretory this gameboard does not discount credentials. fact18: This gameboard is a paid and it is secretory. fact19: Something is a Racine and is not a Pissis if that is a Ibrahim. fact20: That semiconductor is a Ibrahim if that semiconductor does not tip Dicotyledonae. fact21: This gameboard is secretory. fact22: This protohippus is an increased. fact23: If the cive is not a blot then this grind is a Nagasaki and it is balletic.

fact1: ¬{J}{a} -> ¬({D}{a} & {G}{a}) fact2: {G}{c} -> ¬{G}{b} fact3: (x): {B}x -> {D}x fact4: ¬{N}{e} fact5: (x): ¬{I}x -> (¬{H}x v ¬{J}x) fact6: (x): ({B}x & {A}x) -> ¬{E}x fact7: (¬{P}{d} & ¬{O}{d}) fact8: (x): ¬{G}x -> ({A}x v {B}x) fact9: ¬{J}{d} -> {H}{a} fact10: ¬({D}{a} & {G}{a}) -> ¬{D}{a} fact11: {H}{a} -> ¬(¬{C}{a} & ¬{F}{a}) fact12: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬({D}x & ¬{E}x) fact13: ¬{D}{a} -> ({B}{bo} & {C}{bo}) fact14: (x): {A}x -> {D}x fact15: {B}{a} fact16: ¬{H}{d} -> {H}{a} fact17: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{C}{b} fact18: ({FA}{b} & {B}{b}) fact19: (x): {L}x -> ({K}x & ¬{I}x) fact20: ¬{O}{d} -> {L}{d} fact21: {B}{b} fact22: {A}{a} fact23: ¬{N}{e} -> ({M}{c} & {G}{c})

That buckaroo does not ossify Cuculiformes.

¬{E}{bo}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this protohippus is not a kind of a dreaminess then the fact that this protohippus is convertible and the thing is balletic is wrong. fact2: If that this grind is balletic is right this gameboard is not balletic. fact3: Something is convertible if this thing is secretory. fact4: The cive is not a blot. fact5: Something is not carunculous and/or that is not a dreaminess if that is not a Pissis. fact6: If something that is not non-secretory is an increased it does not ossify Cuculiformes. fact7: That semiconductor does not sorrow Seaborg and that does not tip Dicotyledonae. fact8: Either something is an increased or it is secretory or both if it is not balletic. fact9: If that semiconductor is not a kind of a dreaminess then this protohippus is carunculous. fact10: This protohippus is not convertible if that it is convertible and it is balletic does not hold. fact11: That this protohippus does not discount credentials and is not a Robertson is incorrect if this protohippus is carunculous. fact12: The fact that somebody is convertible one that does not ossify Cuculiformes is wrong if that the one does not discount credentials hold. fact13: That buckaroo is secretory and it discounts credentials if this protohippus is not convertible. fact14: Someone is convertible if it is an increased. fact15: This protohippus is not non-secretory. fact16: If that semiconductor is not carunculous this protohippus is carunculous. fact17: If this protohippus is a kind of an increased and it is secretory this gameboard does not discount credentials. fact18: This gameboard is a paid and it is secretory. fact19: Something is a Racine and is not a Pissis if that is a Ibrahim. fact20: That semiconductor is a Ibrahim if that semiconductor does not tip Dicotyledonae. fact21: This gameboard is secretory. fact22: This protohippus is an increased. fact23: If the cive is not a blot then this grind is a Nagasaki and it is balletic. ; $hypothesis$ = That this gameboard is a kind of convertible one that does not ossify Cuculiformes does not hold. ; $proof$ =

fact22 & fact15 -> int1: The fact that this protohippus is an increased that is secretory is true.; int1 & fact17 -> int2: This gameboard does not discount credentials.; fact12 -> int3: If this gameboard does not discount credentials then that this gameboard is a kind of convertible person that does not ossify Cuculiformes is false.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That audiogram is not cerous but he/she is Appalachian.

(¬{C}{b} & {A}{b})

fact1: That audiogram is Appalachian. fact2: That that audiogram is a kind of a Asteraceae is right if that WLAN is a kind of a agrapha. fact3: That audiogram is not non-Appalachian if that is a Asteraceae. fact4: Something is Appalachian if it is a Asteraceae. fact5: That that WLAN is not a agrapha but that person is cenogenetic is false. fact6: Somebody is not a England but that one is a subjectivity if that one is Appalachian. fact7: A Asteraceae is both non-cerous and Appalachian. fact8: The fact that that WLAN is a agrapha and this one is cenogenetic does not hold.

fact1: {A}{b} fact2: {AA}{a} -> {B}{b} fact3: {B}{b} -> {A}{b} fact4: (x): {B}x -> {A}x fact5: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact6: (x): {A}x -> (¬{E}x & {CF}x) fact7: (x): {B}x -> (¬{C}x & {A}x) fact8: ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a})

This precipitate is not a England but he is a subjectivity if he is Appalachian.

{A}{gk} -> (¬{E}{gk} & {CF}{gk})

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: That audiogram is Appalachian. fact2: That that audiogram is a kind of a Asteraceae is right if that WLAN is a kind of a agrapha. fact3: That audiogram is not non-Appalachian if that is a Asteraceae. fact4: Something is Appalachian if it is a Asteraceae. fact5: That that WLAN is not a agrapha but that person is cenogenetic is false. fact6: Somebody is not a England but that one is a subjectivity if that one is Appalachian. fact7: A Asteraceae is both non-cerous and Appalachian. fact8: The fact that that WLAN is a agrapha and this one is cenogenetic does not hold. ; $hypothesis$ = That audiogram is not cerous but he/she is Appalachian. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That this conglobation does not occurs and/or this joltiness happens is wrong.

¬(¬{AA} v {AB})

fact1: If that seminar does not happens that both that staggering Delphinus and this indulgence occurs is wrong. fact2: That this euphemisticness happens causes that that seminar does not happens and that stagging happens. fact3: That staggering Delphinus does not occurs if that that staggering Delphinus and this indulgence occurs is false. fact4: Notthat deformationalness but this euphemisticness occurs if this certifying does not happens. fact5: If this Hasidicness does not happens this cobbling Baltimore does not happens and/or the insignificantness occurs. fact6: If this Hasidicness happens then that this conglobation does not happens and/or this joltiness happens is incorrect. fact7: This certifying does not happens if both this viva and that gunshot happens. fact8: This viva occurs. fact9: If that staggering Delphinus does not happens then that jeering sufferance and this Hasidicness occurs. fact10: Either this conglobation or this joltiness or both occurs.

fact1: ¬{E} -> ¬({C} & {D}) fact2: {G} -> (¬{E} & {F}) fact3: ¬({C} & {D}) -> ¬{C} fact4: ¬{I} -> (¬{H} & {G}) fact5: ¬{A} -> (¬{GS} v {HN}) fact6: {A} -> ¬(¬{AA} v {AB}) fact7: ({K} & {J}) -> ¬{I} fact8: {K} fact9: ¬{C} -> ({B} & {A}) fact10: ({AA} v {AB})

This cobbling Baltimore does not happens or the insignificantness occurs or both.

(¬{GS} v {HN})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that seminar does not happens that both that staggering Delphinus and this indulgence occurs is wrong. fact2: That this euphemisticness happens causes that that seminar does not happens and that stagging happens. fact3: That staggering Delphinus does not occurs if that that staggering Delphinus and this indulgence occurs is false. fact4: Notthat deformationalness but this euphemisticness occurs if this certifying does not happens. fact5: If this Hasidicness does not happens this cobbling Baltimore does not happens and/or the insignificantness occurs. fact6: If this Hasidicness happens then that this conglobation does not happens and/or this joltiness happens is incorrect. fact7: This certifying does not happens if both this viva and that gunshot happens. fact8: This viva occurs. fact9: If that staggering Delphinus does not happens then that jeering sufferance and this Hasidicness occurs. fact10: Either this conglobation or this joltiness or both occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That this conglobation does not occurs and/or this joltiness happens is wrong. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

Everybody is a Mantineia that does not emigrate.

(x): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x)

fact1: Somebody is a Platycephalidae that is a kind of a ravenousness if it is not purposeless. fact2: Every person is rayless and is not fibrillose. fact3: Everything Stopeses Thysanocarpus. fact4: If something shadows oscheocele then it is not purposeless. fact5: Somebody that is not a kind of a ravenousness is a Mesoamerican and is a Platycephalidae. fact6: Everything is not a forked. fact7: Everything is a Mantineia. fact8: Some man that is not unimproved shadows oscheocele and is electromotive. fact9: Everything does not shadow oscheocele. fact10: Something is a Normandy and is not a startling if it is a Mesoamerican. fact11: Everything is both not improved and non-fibrillose. fact12: Everything pastes scandalousness and does not clamour Mammuthus. fact13: Everybody is asleep one that is not a flotilla. fact14: Somebody is a Mesoamerican if it is a Platycephalidae. fact15: If someone is a Mesoamerican this one bares avidness and this one is noncombustible. fact16: Every man is nonpolar and that person does not win rhinolaryngology. fact17: Every person is a crack.

fact1: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({B}x & {C}x) fact2: (x): ({IF}x & ¬{HT}x) fact3: (x): {CR}x fact4: (x): {E}x -> ¬{D}x fact5: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x & {B}x) fact6: (x): ¬{H}x fact7: (x): {AA}x fact8: (x): ¬{G}x -> ({E}x & {F}x) fact9: (x): ¬{E}x fact10: (x): {A}x -> ({AG}x & ¬{DH}x) fact11: (x): ({G}x & ¬{HT}x) fact12: (x): ({CO}x & ¬{DS}x) fact13: (x): ({CA}x & ¬{JD}x) fact14: (x): {B}x -> {A}x fact15: (x): {A}x -> ({M}x & ¬{HP}x) fact16: (x): ({GO}x & ¬{CG}x) fact17: (x): {DT}x

Every person is a Normandy and is not a kind of a startling.

(x): ({AG}x & ¬{DH}x)

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Somebody is a Platycephalidae that is a kind of a ravenousness if it is not purposeless. fact2: Every person is rayless and is not fibrillose. fact3: Everything Stopeses Thysanocarpus. fact4: If something shadows oscheocele then it is not purposeless. fact5: Somebody that is not a kind of a ravenousness is a Mesoamerican and is a Platycephalidae. fact6: Everything is not a forked. fact7: Everything is a Mantineia. fact8: Some man that is not unimproved shadows oscheocele and is electromotive. fact9: Everything does not shadow oscheocele. fact10: Something is a Normandy and is not a startling if it is a Mesoamerican. fact11: Everything is both not improved and non-fibrillose. fact12: Everything pastes scandalousness and does not clamour Mammuthus. fact13: Everybody is asleep one that is not a flotilla. fact14: Somebody is a Mesoamerican if it is a Platycephalidae. fact15: If someone is a Mesoamerican this one bares avidness and this one is noncombustible. fact16: Every man is nonpolar and that person does not win rhinolaryngology. fact17: Every person is a crack. ; $hypothesis$ = Everybody is a Mantineia that does not emigrate. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That agnate does not harbour M2.

¬{B}{b}

fact1: If something is not a dragging then that harbours M2. fact2: Some person is a dragging if he/she is a reductivism. fact3: If that agnate is not a dragging then she/he harbours M2. fact4: If the fact that this sandpiper is not a Soleidae but loud does not hold then it is not loud. fact5: That that agnate is not a philhellene but a dragging does not hold if this sandpiper is not a reductivism. fact6: If that something is not a kind of a Soleidae and does cultivate Xiphias does not hold it is not loud. fact7: If that gallina is a RAM the fact that that agnate cultivates Xiphias is right. fact8: If that gallina is not a kind of a purpose then this does not transfix Lugosi and is not a kind of a hypermetropia. fact9: If something is not a RAM the fact that that thing is not a Soleidae and cultivates Xiphias is false. fact10: Some man is a reductivism and it harbours M2 if it is not loud. fact11: That this sandpiper is not a reductivism and reissues misprint is false. fact12: If that agnate does not harbour M2 the fact that this sandpiper is not a philhellene but this one is a reductivism is wrong. fact13: If this sandpiper does not unbridled transcript and the thing is qualify then that agnate is not a kind of a RAM. fact14: That someone does not unbridled transcript and is not unfitting is correct if it is not a kind of a hypermetropia. fact15: This sandpiper is not a kind of a hypermetropia if that gallina does not transfix Lugosi and is not a kind of a hypermetropia. fact16: If some man is not loud it does not harbour M2 and is not a reductivism. fact17: This sandpiper is not a reductivism. fact18: If the fact that something is a purpose and it is nonrigid is wrong then it is not a purpose.

fact1: (x): ¬{AB}x -> {B}x fact2: (x): {A}x -> {AB}x fact3: ¬{AB}{b} -> {B}{b} fact4: ¬(¬{E}{a} & {C}{a}) -> ¬{C}{a} fact5: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact6: (x): ¬(¬{E}x & {D}x) -> ¬{C}x fact7: {F}{c} -> {D}{b} fact8: ¬{J}{c} -> (¬{K}{c} & ¬{I}{c}) fact9: (x): ¬{F}x -> ¬(¬{E}x & {D}x) fact10: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x & {B}x) fact11: ¬(¬{A}{a} & {EK}{a}) fact12: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {A}{a}) fact13: (¬{H}{a} & ¬{G}{a}) -> ¬{F}{b} fact14: (x): ¬{I}x -> (¬{H}x & ¬{G}x) fact15: (¬{K}{c} & ¬{I}{c}) -> ¬{I}{a} fact16: (x): ¬{C}x -> (¬{B}x & ¬{A}x) fact17: ¬{A}{a} fact18: (x): ¬({J}x & {L}x) -> ¬{J}x

That agnate does not harbour M2.

¬{B}{b}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If something is not a dragging then that harbours M2. fact2: Some person is a dragging if he/she is a reductivism. fact3: If that agnate is not a dragging then she/he harbours M2. fact4: If the fact that this sandpiper is not a Soleidae but loud does not hold then it is not loud. fact5: That that agnate is not a philhellene but a dragging does not hold if this sandpiper is not a reductivism. fact6: If that something is not a kind of a Soleidae and does cultivate Xiphias does not hold it is not loud. fact7: If that gallina is a RAM the fact that that agnate cultivates Xiphias is right. fact8: If that gallina is not a kind of a purpose then this does not transfix Lugosi and is not a kind of a hypermetropia. fact9: If something is not a RAM the fact that that thing is not a Soleidae and cultivates Xiphias is false. fact10: Some man is a reductivism and it harbours M2 if it is not loud. fact11: That this sandpiper is not a reductivism and reissues misprint is false. fact12: If that agnate does not harbour M2 the fact that this sandpiper is not a philhellene but this one is a reductivism is wrong. fact13: If this sandpiper does not unbridled transcript and the thing is qualify then that agnate is not a kind of a RAM. fact14: That someone does not unbridled transcript and is not unfitting is correct if it is not a kind of a hypermetropia. fact15: This sandpiper is not a kind of a hypermetropia if that gallina does not transfix Lugosi and is not a kind of a hypermetropia. fact16: If some man is not loud it does not harbour M2 and is not a reductivism. fact17: This sandpiper is not a reductivism. fact18: If the fact that something is a purpose and it is nonrigid is wrong then it is not a purpose. ; $hypothesis$ = That agnate does not harbour M2. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That watering is a flabbiness.

{A}{a}

fact1: That watering is conventional. fact2: That watering is not a kind of a flabbiness and that thing is not unconventional. fact3: If this kiosk is unconventional then this kiosk is both not a flabbiness and a moisture.

fact1: ¬{B}{a} fact2: (¬{A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) fact3: {B}{b} -> (¬{A}{b} & {CS}{b})

That watering is not a moisture and not mental.

(¬{CS}{a} & ¬{ET}{a})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That watering is conventional. fact2: That watering is not a kind of a flabbiness and that thing is not unconventional. fact3: If this kiosk is unconventional then this kiosk is both not a flabbiness and a moisture. ; $hypothesis$ = That watering is a flabbiness. ; $proof$ =

fact2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

The fact that this quesadilla is not congressional but it contaminates tangled if this quesadilla is provident is false.

¬({A}{a} -> (¬{C}{a} & {B}{a}))

fact1: If this quesadilla is a steadied then the fact that this quesadilla is congressional does not hold. fact2: The fact that this quesadilla contaminates tangled is correct if this quesadilla is provident. fact3: This quesadilla is not provident if the fact that this one either is a kind of a steadied or does not form jury or both is false. fact4: The vacillator is a steadied. fact5: That mailboat is a kind of a semiology if that ZDV is not a semiology and not negligent. fact6: This quesadilla is a steadied. fact7: If that mailboat is a semiology then this quesadilla is congressional. fact8: The cartroad is improvident if this quesadilla is a kind of improvident one that is congressional. fact9: If somebody is not provident then that person does contaminate tangled.

fact1: {D}{a} -> ¬{C}{a} fact2: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} fact3: ¬({D}{a} v ¬{E}{a}) -> ¬{A}{a} fact4: {D}{h} fact5: (¬{F}{c} & ¬{G}{c}) -> {F}{b} fact6: {D}{a} fact7: {F}{b} -> {C}{a} fact8: (¬{A}{a} & {C}{a}) -> ¬{A}{bt} fact9: (x): ¬{A}x -> {B}x

The cartroad contaminates tangled.

{B}{bt}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this quesadilla is a steadied then the fact that this quesadilla is congressional does not hold. fact2: The fact that this quesadilla contaminates tangled is correct if this quesadilla is provident. fact3: This quesadilla is not provident if the fact that this one either is a kind of a steadied or does not form jury or both is false. fact4: The vacillator is a steadied. fact5: That mailboat is a kind of a semiology if that ZDV is not a semiology and not negligent. fact6: This quesadilla is a steadied. fact7: If that mailboat is a semiology then this quesadilla is congressional. fact8: The cartroad is improvident if this quesadilla is a kind of improvident one that is congressional. fact9: If somebody is not provident then that person does contaminate tangled. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that this quesadilla is not congressional but it contaminates tangled if this quesadilla is provident is false. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that this quesadilla is not improvident.; fact2 & assump1 -> int1: This quesadilla contaminates tangled.; fact1 & fact6 -> int2: This quesadilla is not congressional.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This quesadilla is not congressional and contaminates tangled.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That aluminum is not a impracticableness.

¬{B}{b}

fact1: If someone that unifies does not woo metonymy it is not a impracticableness. fact2: If this fluoroscope is not a favism then that aluminum unifies and does not woo metonymy. fact3: If some man is a impracticableness and attentive then it does not actualise Cydippea.

fact1: (x): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x fact2: ¬{A}{a} -> ({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact3: (x): ({B}x & ¬{EM}x) -> ¬{BT}x

If this Bourbon is a impracticableness but that thing is not inattentive then that thing does not actualise Cydippea.

({B}{bf} & ¬{EM}{bf}) -> ¬{BT}{bf}

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: If someone that unifies does not woo metonymy it is not a impracticableness. fact2: If this fluoroscope is not a favism then that aluminum unifies and does not woo metonymy. fact3: If some man is a impracticableness and attentive then it does not actualise Cydippea. ; $hypothesis$ = That aluminum is not a impracticableness. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That this lame is not a Duvalier and/or is a contentment is false.

¬(¬{A}{b} v {C}{b})

fact1: That Mebaral is a serfdom or it is a hypobetalipoproteinemia or both if this lame is not a kind of a telegram. fact2: This lame is not a kind of a Duvalier or this is a contentment or both if that Mebaral is not a hypobetalipoproteinemia. fact3: If that Mebaral is a telegram and a contentment then the fact that that Mebaral is not a Duvalier is right. fact4: This lame is a Duvalier and/or is a contentment if that Mebaral is not a hypobetalipoproteinemia. fact5: That Mebaral is a serfdom and a telegram. fact6: That Mebaral is not a hypobetalipoproteinemia if that Mebaral is both a serfdom and a telegram. fact7: The fact that something is not a Duvalier and/or it is a contentment does not hold if it is not a hypobetalipoproteinemia.

fact1: ¬{AB}{b} -> ({AA}{a} v {B}{a}) fact2: ¬{B}{a} -> (¬{A}{b} v {C}{b}) fact3: ({AB}{a} & {C}{a}) -> ¬{A}{a} fact4: ¬{B}{a} -> ({A}{b} v {C}{b}) fact5: ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact6: ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact7: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬(¬{A}x v {C}x)

That this lame is not a Duvalier and/or is a contentment is false.

¬(¬{A}{b} v {C}{b})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That Mebaral is a serfdom or it is a hypobetalipoproteinemia or both if this lame is not a kind of a telegram. fact2: This lame is not a kind of a Duvalier or this is a contentment or both if that Mebaral is not a hypobetalipoproteinemia. fact3: If that Mebaral is a telegram and a contentment then the fact that that Mebaral is not a Duvalier is right. fact4: This lame is a Duvalier and/or is a contentment if that Mebaral is not a hypobetalipoproteinemia. fact5: That Mebaral is a serfdom and a telegram. fact6: That Mebaral is not a hypobetalipoproteinemia if that Mebaral is both a serfdom and a telegram. fact7: The fact that something is not a Duvalier and/or it is a contentment does not hold if it is not a hypobetalipoproteinemia. ; $hypothesis$ = That this lame is not a Duvalier and/or is a contentment is false. ; $proof$ =

fact6 & fact5 -> int1: That Mebaral is not a hypobetalipoproteinemia.; int1 & fact2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This spamming happens.

{C}

fact1: That this furnishing Sambucus does not happens yields either that that seguing occurs or that this tolerantness does not occurs or both. fact2: If that notthe quietness but that roguery occurs does not hold that roguery does not occurs. fact3: This cheliceralness occurs. fact4: If that roguery does not happens then the takingsing decasyllable does not occurs and this tangentialness does not happens. fact5: That seguing occurs if the fact that that acapnialness happens but the committing does not happens does not hold. fact6: That both that non-quietness and that roguery happens is not true if this flunking epigram occurs. fact7: If that seguing occurs then this furnishing Sambucus occurs and this spamming does not happens. fact8: If that acapnialness does not happens the fact that both the committing and this furnishing Sambucus occurs is incorrect. fact9: That that acapnialness does not occurs and this payoff does not happens is caused by that this tangentialness does not occurs. fact10: That this spamming does not happens is caused by this cheliceralness or that this tolerantness occurs or both. fact11: If this furnishing Sambucus but notthis spamming occurs then that this tolerantness happens is true. fact12: This furnishing Sambucus does not happens if that the committing happens and this furnishing Sambucus occurs does not hold. fact13: The boozing does not occurs if either this tolerantness or that non-cheliceralness or both happens. fact14: That that seguing or the intolerantness or both occurs yields that the intolerant does not occurs. fact15: Either this punishing hebephrenia occurs or the mounted happens or both.

fact1: ¬{D} -> ({E} v ¬{B}) fact2: ¬(¬{M} & {K}) -> ¬{K} fact3: {A} fact4: ¬{K} -> (¬{J} & ¬{I}) fact5: ¬({F} & ¬{G}) -> {E} fact6: {L} -> ¬(¬{M} & {K}) fact7: {E} -> ({D} & ¬{C}) fact8: ¬{F} -> ¬({G} & {D}) fact9: ¬{I} -> (¬{F} & ¬{H}) fact10: ({A} v {B}) -> ¬{C} fact11: ({D} & ¬{C}) -> {B} fact12: ¬({G} & {D}) -> ¬{D} fact13: ({B} v ¬{A}) -> ¬{FI} fact14: ({E} v ¬{B}) -> ¬{B} fact15: ({GQ} v {JC})

The boozing does not happens.

¬{FI}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That this furnishing Sambucus does not happens yields either that that seguing occurs or that this tolerantness does not occurs or both. fact2: If that notthe quietness but that roguery occurs does not hold that roguery does not occurs. fact3: This cheliceralness occurs. fact4: If that roguery does not happens then the takingsing decasyllable does not occurs and this tangentialness does not happens. fact5: That seguing occurs if the fact that that acapnialness happens but the committing does not happens does not hold. fact6: That both that non-quietness and that roguery happens is not true if this flunking epigram occurs. fact7: If that seguing occurs then this furnishing Sambucus occurs and this spamming does not happens. fact8: If that acapnialness does not happens the fact that both the committing and this furnishing Sambucus occurs is incorrect. fact9: That that acapnialness does not occurs and this payoff does not happens is caused by that this tangentialness does not occurs. fact10: That this spamming does not happens is caused by this cheliceralness or that this tolerantness occurs or both. fact11: If this furnishing Sambucus but notthis spamming occurs then that this tolerantness happens is true. fact12: This furnishing Sambucus does not happens if that the committing happens and this furnishing Sambucus occurs does not hold. fact13: The boozing does not occurs if either this tolerantness or that non-cheliceralness or both happens. fact14: That that seguing or the intolerantness or both occurs yields that the intolerant does not occurs. fact15: Either this punishing hebephrenia occurs or the mounted happens or both. ; $hypothesis$ = This spamming happens. ; $proof$ =

fact3 -> int1: This cheliceralness and/or this tolerantness happens.; int1 & fact10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

Timothy is not a wittiness.

¬{B}{b}

fact1: That Timothy is not a Garrulinae but it is a kind of a wittiness is not true if it is a Sayornis. fact2: The fact that this universal is not a wittiness but she is a kind of a Garrulinae is wrong. fact3: This universal is a kind of a Sayornis. fact4: Timothy is a wittiness if the fact that this universal is not a Garrulinae and is a trance does not hold. fact5: Timothy is a kind of a Sayornis. fact6: This universal is a wittiness if Timothy is not a Garrulinae. fact7: That Timothy is both not a Sayornis and a wittiness is false. fact8: If this universal is a kind of a Sayornis then the fact that it is not a Garrulinae but a trance does not hold. fact9: That limbers is a kind of a Garrulinae. fact10: The fact that this universal is a Garrulinae and that thing is a trance is false. fact11: That the bladderwort is not psychotropic but that thing is a Garrulinae is wrong. fact12: If this universal is a Garrulinae Timothy is a wittiness. fact13: If that Timothy is not a wittiness but it is a trance is wrong this universal is a Sayornis. fact14: The puss is a Garrulinae. fact15: If the fact that this universal is not a kind of a trance and is a wittiness does not hold then Timothy is a kind of a Garrulinae. fact16: Timothy is a kind of a Garrulinae. fact17: If this universal is a Sayornis the fact that this universal is a Garrulinae and it is a trance does not hold.

fact1: {A}{b} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {B}{b}) fact2: ¬(¬{B}{a} & {AA}{a}) fact3: {A}{a} fact4: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} fact5: {A}{b} fact6: ¬{AA}{b} -> {B}{a} fact7: ¬(¬{A}{b} & {B}{b}) fact8: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact9: {AA}{iu} fact10: ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact11: ¬(¬{AU}{cq} & {AA}{cq}) fact12: {AA}{a} -> {B}{b} fact13: ¬(¬{B}{b} & {AB}{b}) -> {A}{a} fact14: {AA}{fo} fact15: ¬(¬{AB}{a} & {B}{a}) -> {AA}{b} fact16: {AA}{b} fact17: {A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a})

DISPROVED

DISPROVED

$facts$ = fact1: That Timothy is not a Garrulinae but it is a kind of a wittiness is not true if it is a Sayornis. fact2: The fact that this universal is not a wittiness but she is a kind of a Garrulinae is wrong. fact3: This universal is a kind of a Sayornis. fact4: Timothy is a wittiness if the fact that this universal is not a Garrulinae and is a trance does not hold. fact5: Timothy is a kind of a Sayornis. fact6: This universal is a wittiness if Timothy is not a Garrulinae. fact7: That Timothy is both not a Sayornis and a wittiness is false. fact8: If this universal is a kind of a Sayornis then the fact that it is not a Garrulinae but a trance does not hold. fact9: That limbers is a kind of a Garrulinae. fact10: The fact that this universal is a Garrulinae and that thing is a trance is false. fact11: That the bladderwort is not psychotropic but that thing is a Garrulinae is wrong. fact12: If this universal is a Garrulinae Timothy is a wittiness. fact13: If that Timothy is not a wittiness but it is a trance is wrong this universal is a Sayornis. fact14: The puss is a Garrulinae. fact15: If the fact that this universal is not a kind of a trance and is a wittiness does not hold then Timothy is a kind of a Garrulinae. fact16: Timothy is a kind of a Garrulinae. fact17: If this universal is a Sayornis the fact that this universal is a Garrulinae and it is a trance does not hold. ; $hypothesis$ = Timothy is not a wittiness. ; $proof$ =

fact8 & fact3 -> int1: That this universal is not a Garrulinae and is a kind of a trance is wrong.; int1 & fact4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That this transport occurs but that unstatesmanlikeness does not occurs is not true.

¬({AA} & ¬{AB})

fact1: This geologicness does not happens and that happening Serinus occurs if that that arming happens is right. fact2: That this geologicness does not occurs and that tonsure does not occurs is wrong. fact3: If this transport but notthat unstatesmanlikeness happens then that Snow does not happens. fact4: That Snow occurs if that this geologicness does not happens and that tonsure does not happens does not hold. fact5: The fact that this warmheartedness does not happens and that superceding apologetics does not occurs is not correct. fact6: The fact that the fact that that reflexology does not occurs and the compromise does not happens hold is false. fact7: This transport occurs and that Snow happens if that happening Serinus does not happens. fact8: This inhalant does not occurs if that tonsure does not happens. fact9: The fact that the talking Connolly occurs is correct if that the hexness does not happens and the unplayableness does not happens is false. fact10: That both the non-geologicness and that tonsure happens is incorrect. fact11: If the fact that the fact that that tonsure happens and that unstatesmanlikeness happens hold does not hold that unstatesmanlikeness does not happens. fact12: This transport happens. fact13: The fact that that the consigning fixedness does not occurs and that arming does not occurs does not hold is true. fact14: If that tonsure happens that Snow happens.

fact1: {E} -> (¬{C} & {D}) fact2: ¬(¬{C} & ¬{A}) fact3: ({AA} & ¬{AB}) -> ¬{B} fact4: ¬(¬{C} & ¬{A}) -> {B} fact5: ¬(¬{CA} & ¬{BS}) fact6: ¬(¬{AF} & ¬{FA}) fact7: ¬{D} -> ({AA} & {B}) fact8: ¬{A} -> ¬{EU} fact9: ¬(¬{HC} & ¬{IE}) -> {JF} fact10: ¬(¬{C} & {A}) fact11: ¬({A} & {AB}) -> ¬{AB} fact12: {AA} fact13: ¬(¬{JB} & ¬{E}) fact14: {A} -> {B}

This inhalant does not occurs.

¬{EU}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This geologicness does not happens and that happening Serinus occurs if that that arming happens is right. fact2: That this geologicness does not occurs and that tonsure does not occurs is wrong. fact3: If this transport but notthat unstatesmanlikeness happens then that Snow does not happens. fact4: That Snow occurs if that this geologicness does not happens and that tonsure does not happens does not hold. fact5: The fact that this warmheartedness does not happens and that superceding apologetics does not occurs is not correct. fact6: The fact that the fact that that reflexology does not occurs and the compromise does not happens hold is false. fact7: This transport occurs and that Snow happens if that happening Serinus does not happens. fact8: This inhalant does not occurs if that tonsure does not happens. fact9: The fact that the talking Connolly occurs is correct if that the hexness does not happens and the unplayableness does not happens is false. fact10: That both the non-geologicness and that tonsure happens is incorrect. fact11: If the fact that the fact that that tonsure happens and that unstatesmanlikeness happens hold does not hold that unstatesmanlikeness does not happens. fact12: This transport happens. fact13: The fact that that the consigning fixedness does not occurs and that arming does not occurs does not hold is true. fact14: If that tonsure happens that Snow happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That this transport occurs but that unstatesmanlikeness does not occurs is not true. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that both this transport and the non-unstatesmanlikeness happens.; fact3 & assump1 -> int1: That Snow does not happens.; fact4 & fact2 -> int2: That Snow happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That authoriser does not rebroadcast Richelieu.

¬{B}{b}

fact1: The fact that the parasympathetic dismisses dreaded and/or is not a Pyongyang is not correct. fact2: If that that viscount is a Pyongyang or does not adulterate ergonomics or both is not correct that authoriser does not rebroadcast Richelieu. fact3: If that authoriser is fecal then that authoriser is a kind of a stagnancy. fact4: the Frasera rhapsodizes viscount. fact5: This flickertail rhapsodizes Frasera and rebroadcasts Richelieu if that viscount is not a kind of a stagnancy. fact6: That authoriser is fecal. fact7: Someone rhapsodizes Frasera and that one rebroadcasts Richelieu if that one is not a kind of a stagnancy. fact8: That authoriser is not a kind of a Pyongyang if that that viscount rebroadcasts Richelieu and/or adulterates ergonomics does not hold. fact9: That authoriser is a distrust and/or beads ache if this thing is not fecal. fact10: That authoriser does not adulterate ergonomics if that that viscount rhapsodizes Frasera and/or does rebroadcast Richelieu is wrong. fact11: If the fact that that viscount either is a kind of a Pyongyang or adulterates ergonomics or both is false then that authoriser does not rebroadcast Richelieu. fact12: That viscount rhapsodizes Frasera. fact13: If that viscount rhapsodizes Frasera that viscount adulterates ergonomics.

fact1: ¬({DP}{hi} v ¬{AA}{hi}) fact2: ¬({AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact3: {F}{b} -> {C}{b} fact4: {AC}{aa} fact5: ¬{C}{a} -> ({A}{jc} & {B}{jc}) fact6: {F}{b} fact7: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x & {B}x) fact8: ¬({B}{a} v {AB}{a}) -> ¬{AA}{b} fact9: ¬{F}{b} -> ({D}{b} v {E}{b}) fact10: ¬({A}{a} v {B}{a}) -> ¬{AB}{b} fact11: ¬({AA}{a} v {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact12: {A}{a} fact13: {A}{a} -> {AB}{a}

That authoriser rebroadcasts Richelieu.

{B}{b}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that the parasympathetic dismisses dreaded and/or is not a Pyongyang is not correct. fact2: If that that viscount is a Pyongyang or does not adulterate ergonomics or both is not correct that authoriser does not rebroadcast Richelieu. fact3: If that authoriser is fecal then that authoriser is a kind of a stagnancy. fact4: the Frasera rhapsodizes viscount. fact5: This flickertail rhapsodizes Frasera and rebroadcasts Richelieu if that viscount is not a kind of a stagnancy. fact6: That authoriser is fecal. fact7: Someone rhapsodizes Frasera and that one rebroadcasts Richelieu if that one is not a kind of a stagnancy. fact8: That authoriser is not a kind of a Pyongyang if that that viscount rebroadcasts Richelieu and/or adulterates ergonomics does not hold. fact9: That authoriser is a distrust and/or beads ache if this thing is not fecal. fact10: That authoriser does not adulterate ergonomics if that that viscount rhapsodizes Frasera and/or does rebroadcast Richelieu is wrong. fact11: If the fact that that viscount either is a kind of a Pyongyang or adulterates ergonomics or both is false then that authoriser does not rebroadcast Richelieu. fact12: That viscount rhapsodizes Frasera. fact13: If that viscount rhapsodizes Frasera that viscount adulterates ergonomics. ; $hypothesis$ = That authoriser does not rebroadcast Richelieu. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This strophanthus is not a detainment but unemotional.

(¬{B}{a} & {C}{a})

fact1: If that holidaymaker does not create impermanence and is not a Seiurus then that fry does poach millenary. fact2: Someone is not anabatic if the fact that it is anabatic and it is not a detainment does not hold. fact3: If there is something such that it does not poach millenary this strophanthus is not a detainment. fact4: If that that fry does not poach millenary is correct that this strophanthus is anabatic but it is not a detainment does not hold. fact5: Some person poaches millenary. fact6: If the fact that that fry poaches millenary is correct then the fact that this strophanthus is not a detainment but it is unemotional does not hold. fact7: If some person is a kind of a Pectinibranchia then this person does not create impermanence and is not a Seiurus. fact8: There exists someone such that the person does not poach millenary. fact9: If this cautery is a Pectinibranchia then that holidaymaker is a Pectinibranchia. fact10: The fact that this strophanthus is not a kind of a detainment is true.

fact1: (¬{E}{c} & ¬{D}{c}) -> {A}{b} fact2: (x): ¬({JJ}x & ¬{B}x) -> ¬{JJ}x fact3: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬{B}{a} fact4: ¬{A}{b} -> ¬({JJ}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) fact5: (Ex): {A}x fact6: {A}{b} -> ¬(¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}) fact7: (x): {F}x -> (¬{E}x & ¬{D}x) fact8: (Ex): ¬{A}x fact9: {F}{d} -> {F}{c} fact10: ¬{B}{a}

There exists something such that it is not anabatic.

(Ex): ¬{JJ}x

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that holidaymaker does not create impermanence and is not a Seiurus then that fry does poach millenary. fact2: Someone is not anabatic if the fact that it is anabatic and it is not a detainment does not hold. fact3: If there is something such that it does not poach millenary this strophanthus is not a detainment. fact4: If that that fry does not poach millenary is correct that this strophanthus is anabatic but it is not a detainment does not hold. fact5: Some person poaches millenary. fact6: If the fact that that fry poaches millenary is correct then the fact that this strophanthus is not a detainment but it is unemotional does not hold. fact7: If some person is a kind of a Pectinibranchia then this person does not create impermanence and is not a Seiurus. fact8: There exists someone such that the person does not poach millenary. fact9: If this cautery is a Pectinibranchia then that holidaymaker is a Pectinibranchia. fact10: The fact that this strophanthus is not a kind of a detainment is true. ; $hypothesis$ = This strophanthus is not a detainment but unemotional. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That publican is a coursing.

{D}{b}

fact1: This sterilizer is a kleptomania and that thing is unvoiced. fact2: If this sterilizer is unvoiced or identifies counteroffer or both that publican is not a coursing.

fact1: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact2: ({B}{a} v {C}{a}) -> ¬{D}{b}

DISPROVED

DISPROVED

$facts$ = fact1: This sterilizer is a kleptomania and that thing is unvoiced. fact2: If this sterilizer is unvoiced or identifies counteroffer or both that publican is not a coursing. ; $hypothesis$ = That publican is a coursing. ; $proof$ =

fact1 -> int1: This sterilizer is unvoiced.; int1 -> int2: This sterilizer is unvoiced and/or identifies counteroffer.; int2 & fact2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That Oxford is not Homeric.

¬{AA}{a}

fact1: The fact that that Oxford is not a syndicalism is true. fact2: That Oxford is not a playacting if this person is not a Automeris. fact3: The cookout is not Homeric. fact4: The lecher is not Homeric. fact5: That Oxford is not a muscovite and does not saddle if it is not a Caloocan. fact6: The revisionist is not Homeric. fact7: That antifungal is not Homeric. fact8: If that Oxford does not untangle Rostov that Oxford is not Homeric. fact9: That Oxford is not sectarian. fact10: That Oxford is not epizoan and that one is not a Priscoan. fact11: That BA is not pectineal. fact12: That Oxford is not a muscovite. fact13: That Oxford is not a kind of a syntagma. fact14: That Oxford does not masturbate junta if this does not flog. fact15: That Oxford is not Homeric and the thing is not pectineal if that Oxford is not a muscovite. fact16: Traci is not a kind of a muscovite. fact17: That Oxford is not pectineal and he does not accouter lymphedema.

fact1: ¬{DD}{a} fact2: ¬{IK}{a} -> ¬{AC}{a} fact3: ¬{AA}{ir} fact4: ¬{AA}{ag} fact5: ¬{CK}{a} -> (¬{A}{a} & ¬{GM}{a}) fact6: ¬{AA}{ak} fact7: ¬{AA}{fa} fact8: ¬{DI}{a} -> ¬{AA}{a} fact9: ¬{CL}{a} fact10: (¬{S}{a} & ¬{ED}{a}) fact11: ¬{AB}{ea} fact12: ¬{A}{a} fact13: ¬{GD}{a} fact14: ¬{GF}{a} -> ¬{BJ}{a} fact15: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact16: ¬{A}{fs} fact17: (¬{AB}{a} & ¬{JK}{a})

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that that Oxford is not a syndicalism is true. fact2: That Oxford is not a playacting if this person is not a Automeris. fact3: The cookout is not Homeric. fact4: The lecher is not Homeric. fact5: That Oxford is not a muscovite and does not saddle if it is not a Caloocan. fact6: The revisionist is not Homeric. fact7: That antifungal is not Homeric. fact8: If that Oxford does not untangle Rostov that Oxford is not Homeric. fact9: That Oxford is not sectarian. fact10: That Oxford is not epizoan and that one is not a Priscoan. fact11: That BA is not pectineal. fact12: That Oxford is not a muscovite. fact13: That Oxford is not a kind of a syntagma. fact14: That Oxford does not masturbate junta if this does not flog. fact15: That Oxford is not Homeric and the thing is not pectineal if that Oxford is not a muscovite. fact16: Traci is not a kind of a muscovite. fact17: That Oxford is not pectineal and he does not accouter lymphedema. ; $hypothesis$ = That Oxford is not Homeric. ; $proof$ =

fact15 & fact12 -> int1: That Oxford is not Homeric and this thing is non-pectineal.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That chip occurs.

{E}

fact1: If that Nilotic does not occurs then this unstoppableness but notthis dateableness happens. fact2: The fact that the fact that this cleanup does not occurs and this unsatisfactoriness does not happens does not hold is true if that this indiscreetness does not happens hold. fact3: If the fact that this catechism does not happens and this philatelicness does not occurs does not hold then this philatelicness happens. fact4: That this unsatisfactoriness and this indiscreetness happens leads to that that chip does not occurs. fact5: The relative happens. fact6: That that appaling IRS does not happens but this indiscreetness occurs does not hold. fact7: That concentrating does not occurs and that Gallicanness does not occurs if that spanking myg happens. fact8: This stipendiariness and this workout happens if that processing Saussurea does not occurs. fact9: That this unsatisfactoriness occurs is caused by this cleanup. fact10: That this unstoppableness occurs and this dateableness does not occurs brings about that this alienating Danaus does not happens. fact11: That this alienating Danaus does not happens yields that that spanking myg happens and this symbolicness occurs. fact12: That furtherance is prevented by that both the anastomoticness and the technical happens. fact13: That that whirring happens or this cleanup happens or both is true. fact14: If the fact that this onanism does not occurs and that rivalry does not happens is false that rivalry occurs. fact15: That that chip occurs is caused by that that whirring happens. fact16: If that concentrating does not happens then that that appaling IRS does not occurs and that haematalness does not occurs is wrong. fact17: If that whirring does not happens and this cleanup does not happens the fact that this crushing occurs is right. fact18: That chip occurs if the fact that that chip does not occurs but that appaling IRS occurs is false. fact19: That this stipendiariness happens causes that that Nilotic does not happens and the Downing does not happens. fact20: This indiscreetness happens if that that appaling IRS does not happens and this indiscreetness does not happens is wrong. fact21: That that appaling IRS does not occurs and this indiscreetness does not happens does not hold. fact22: If that concentrating and the tailing happens the adrenal does not happens. fact23: The fact that this unsatisfactoriness happens is correct if that whirring happens.

fact1: ¬{O} -> ({M} & ¬{N}) fact2: ¬{D} -> ¬(¬{B} & ¬{C}) fact3: ¬(¬{ER} & ¬{CQ}) -> {CQ} fact4: ({C} & {D}) -> ¬{E} fact5: {JB} fact6: ¬(¬{F} & {D}) fact7: {J} -> (¬{H} & ¬{I}) fact8: ¬{S} -> ({Q} & {R}) fact9: {B} -> {C} fact10: ({M} & ¬{N}) -> ¬{L} fact11: ¬{L} -> ({J} & {K}) fact12: ({CN} & {BC}) -> ¬{JG} fact13: ({A} v {B}) fact14: ¬(¬{HS} & ¬{IC}) -> {IC} fact15: {A} -> {E} fact16: ¬{H} -> ¬(¬{F} & ¬{G}) fact17: (¬{A} & ¬{B}) -> {IK} fact18: ¬(¬{E} & {F}) -> {E} fact19: {Q} -> (¬{O} & ¬{P}) fact20: ¬(¬{F} & ¬{D}) -> {D} fact21: ¬(¬{F} & ¬{D}) fact22: ({H} & {IB}) -> ¬{IF} fact23: {A} -> {C}

That chip occurs.

{E}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that Nilotic does not occurs then this unstoppableness but notthis dateableness happens. fact2: The fact that the fact that this cleanup does not occurs and this unsatisfactoriness does not happens does not hold is true if that this indiscreetness does not happens hold. fact3: If the fact that this catechism does not happens and this philatelicness does not occurs does not hold then this philatelicness happens. fact4: That this unsatisfactoriness and this indiscreetness happens leads to that that chip does not occurs. fact5: The relative happens. fact6: That that appaling IRS does not happens but this indiscreetness occurs does not hold. fact7: That concentrating does not occurs and that Gallicanness does not occurs if that spanking myg happens. fact8: This stipendiariness and this workout happens if that processing Saussurea does not occurs. fact9: That this unsatisfactoriness occurs is caused by this cleanup. fact10: That this unstoppableness occurs and this dateableness does not occurs brings about that this alienating Danaus does not happens. fact11: That this alienating Danaus does not happens yields that that spanking myg happens and this symbolicness occurs. fact12: That furtherance is prevented by that both the anastomoticness and the technical happens. fact13: That that whirring happens or this cleanup happens or both is true. fact14: If the fact that this onanism does not occurs and that rivalry does not happens is false that rivalry occurs. fact15: That that chip occurs is caused by that that whirring happens. fact16: If that concentrating does not happens then that that appaling IRS does not occurs and that haematalness does not occurs is wrong. fact17: If that whirring does not happens and this cleanup does not happens the fact that this crushing occurs is right. fact18: That chip occurs if the fact that that chip does not occurs but that appaling IRS occurs is false. fact19: That this stipendiariness happens causes that that Nilotic does not happens and the Downing does not happens. fact20: This indiscreetness happens if that that appaling IRS does not happens and this indiscreetness does not happens is wrong. fact21: That that appaling IRS does not occurs and this indiscreetness does not happens does not hold. fact22: If that concentrating and the tailing happens the adrenal does not happens. fact23: The fact that this unsatisfactoriness happens is correct if that whirring happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That chip occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact13 & fact23 & fact9 -> int1: This unsatisfactoriness occurs.; fact21 & fact20 -> int2: This indiscreetness occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This unsatisfactoriness and this indiscreetness happens.; int3 & fact4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That opah is sterile one that is migrational.

({C}{b} & {D}{b})

fact1: That opah is migrational. fact2: Somebody is not a Marengo if that it is philological or is sacrificial or both is wrong. fact3: If that maverick is a kind of a Marengo it is not non-philological. fact4: That that that opah is sterile and it is migrational does not hold hold if it is not a kind of a Marengo. fact5: That maverick is a kind of a Marengo.

fact1: {D}{b} fact2: (x): ¬({B}x v {E}x) -> ¬{A}x fact3: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} fact4: ¬{A}{b} -> ¬({C}{b} & {D}{b}) fact5: {A}{a}

The fact that that opah is sterile and is migrational is false.

¬({C}{b} & {D}{b})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That opah is migrational. fact2: Somebody is not a Marengo if that it is philological or is sacrificial or both is wrong. fact3: If that maverick is a kind of a Marengo it is not non-philological. fact4: That that that opah is sterile and it is migrational does not hold hold if it is not a kind of a Marengo. fact5: That maverick is a kind of a Marengo. ; $hypothesis$ = That opah is sterile one that is migrational. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This bust occurs.

{B}

fact1: That this bust does not happens causes that that enfeoffing Darmera happens and this Djiboutianness occurs. fact2: This Djiboutianness and this bust occurs. fact3: If this undeclaredness does not occurs the fact that that rafting Strachey occurs and the fixings happens hold. fact4: This undeclaredness does not occurs.

fact1: ¬{B} -> ({DF} & {A}) fact2: ({A} & {B}) fact3: ¬{F} -> ({EU} & {C}) fact4: ¬{F}

That rafting Strachey and that enfeoffing Darmera happens.

({EU} & {DF})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That this bust does not happens causes that that enfeoffing Darmera happens and this Djiboutianness occurs. fact2: This Djiboutianness and this bust occurs. fact3: If this undeclaredness does not occurs the fact that that rafting Strachey occurs and the fixings happens hold. fact4: This undeclaredness does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = This bust occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That blackleg is a kind of a past.

{A}{a}

fact1: If someone that does not cuddle finances then that one is a past. fact2: That blackleg is a kind of a past.

fact1: (x): (¬{B}x & {C}x) -> {A}x fact2: {A}{a}

This nombril is a past.

{A}{dt}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If someone that does not cuddle finances then that one is a past. fact2: That blackleg is a kind of a past. ; $hypothesis$ = That blackleg is a kind of a past. ; $proof$ =

fact2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That apocrineness does not happens.

¬{A}

fact1: If the darkening hygiene happens this unearnedness does not happens and that swigging Caesaropapism does not occurs. fact2: That forswearing horseshit does not happens if both the non-apocrineness and that coppering occurs. fact3: The war does not happens. fact4: That apocrineness does not happens. fact5: The vaporizing Aquitaine does not occurs. fact6: The fructifying does not happens. fact7: This gaffe does not happens. fact8: If this rebound does not happens then that coppering happens and that diabolizing fizzing occurs. fact9: That that apocrineness occurs is triggered by that notthis unearnedness but that coppering occurs. fact10: The annihilating subspecies does not happens. fact11: That phagocyticness does not happens. fact12: The disciplinariness does not occurs. fact13: The darkening hygiene and that whiting occurs. fact14: This accompanying does not happens.

fact1: {H} -> (¬{C} & ¬{E}) fact2: (¬{A} & {B}) -> ¬{GM} fact3: ¬{IJ} fact4: ¬{A} fact5: ¬{BE} fact6: ¬{IO} fact7: ¬{AS} fact8: ¬{F} -> ({B} & {D}) fact9: (¬{C} & {B}) -> {A} fact10: ¬{JG} fact11: ¬{AB} fact12: ¬{EM} fact13: ({H} & {K}) fact14: ¬{HE}

That forswearing horseshit does not happens.

¬{GM}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If the darkening hygiene happens this unearnedness does not happens and that swigging Caesaropapism does not occurs. fact2: That forswearing horseshit does not happens if both the non-apocrineness and that coppering occurs. fact3: The war does not happens. fact4: That apocrineness does not happens. fact5: The vaporizing Aquitaine does not occurs. fact6: The fructifying does not happens. fact7: This gaffe does not happens. fact8: If this rebound does not happens then that coppering happens and that diabolizing fizzing occurs. fact9: That that apocrineness occurs is triggered by that notthis unearnedness but that coppering occurs. fact10: The annihilating subspecies does not happens. fact11: That phagocyticness does not happens. fact12: The disciplinariness does not occurs. fact13: The darkening hygiene and that whiting occurs. fact14: This accompanying does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That apocrineness does not happens. ; $proof$ =

fact4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

Ileana untangles rationalness.

{A}{a}

fact1: That vocaliser does not untangle rationalness. fact2: Someone is canicular if he is epilithic. fact3: this rationalness does not untangle Ileana. fact4: That sheikha does not untangle rationalness and it is non-canicular if Ileana is not epilithic. fact5: Ileana does not blacken Ercilla. fact6: Someone untangles rationalness if that it is canicular hold. fact7: The fact that something is canicular and it hurries Oceania is wrong if it does not arrange Sparaxis. fact8: Every person does not arrange Sparaxis. fact9: This slopshop does not untangle rationalness. fact10: Ileana is non-zymoid. fact11: Ileana does not untangle rationalness.

fact1: ¬{A}{e} fact2: (x): {C}x -> {B}x fact3: ¬{AA}{aa} fact4: ¬{C}{a} -> (¬{A}{cf} & ¬{B}{cf}) fact5: ¬{FS}{a} fact6: (x): {B}x -> {A}x fact7: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬({B}x & {E}x) fact8: (x): ¬{D}x fact9: ¬{A}{hn} fact10: ¬{AU}{a} fact11: ¬{A}{a}

Ileana untangles rationalness.

{A}{a}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That vocaliser does not untangle rationalness. fact2: Someone is canicular if he is epilithic. fact3: this rationalness does not untangle Ileana. fact4: That sheikha does not untangle rationalness and it is non-canicular if Ileana is not epilithic. fact5: Ileana does not blacken Ercilla. fact6: Someone untangles rationalness if that it is canicular hold. fact7: The fact that something is canicular and it hurries Oceania is wrong if it does not arrange Sparaxis. fact8: Every person does not arrange Sparaxis. fact9: This slopshop does not untangle rationalness. fact10: Ileana is non-zymoid. fact11: Ileana does not untangle rationalness. ; $hypothesis$ = Ileana untangles rationalness. ; $proof$ =

fact11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That this babying does not happens but that revitalizing multiversity occurs is incorrect.

¬(¬{AA} & {AB})

fact1: This SCNT yields that non-anthropologicalness. fact2: This babying does not happens. fact3: This SCNT occurs and the unsexiness happens if this railing does not occurs. fact4: If that forming autumn does not happens that non-noncompliantness and this myoticness happens. fact5: That if the anthropologicalness does not occurs that that non-unsaleableness and this intracranialness happens does not hold is correct. fact6: The fact that both this immediateness and the intermingling thanatopsis happens hold. fact7: That this railing does not happens is brought about by that this horsewhippinging Heyerdahl does not occurs and/or this adducentness does not occurs. fact8: This babying does not occurs and that revitalizing multiversity happens. fact9: That forming autumn does not occurs and that pollution does not happens if that unsaleableness happens. fact10: The forehandness does not happens and this unseaworthiness occurs. fact11: If the fact that notthat unsaleableness but this intracranialness occurs is wrong then that unsaleableness occurs. fact12: The quiescence does not occurs but this smallness happens. fact13: Both that non-westerness and this adducentness occurs. fact14: The fact that this babying does not occurs and that revitalizing multiversity occurs is not correct if that forming autumn does not occurs. fact15: Both that non-unorthodoxness and this myoticness happens.

fact1: {F} -> ¬{D} fact2: ¬{AA} fact3: ¬{H} -> ({F} & {G}) fact4: ¬{A} -> (¬{BI} & {DK}) fact5: ¬{D} -> ¬(¬{C} & {E}) fact6: (¬{GS} & {CR}) fact7: (¬{I} v ¬{J}) -> ¬{H} fact8: (¬{AA} & {AB}) fact9: {C} -> (¬{A} & ¬{B}) fact10: (¬{EN} & {CN}) fact11: ¬(¬{C} & {E}) -> {C} fact12: (¬{AJ} & {CC}) fact13: (¬{IS} & {J}) fact14: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) fact15: (¬{HL} & {DK})

That this babying does not happens but that revitalizing multiversity occurs is incorrect.

¬(¬{AA} & {AB})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This SCNT yields that non-anthropologicalness. fact2: This babying does not happens. fact3: This SCNT occurs and the unsexiness happens if this railing does not occurs. fact4: If that forming autumn does not happens that non-noncompliantness and this myoticness happens. fact5: That if the anthropologicalness does not occurs that that non-unsaleableness and this intracranialness happens does not hold is correct. fact6: The fact that both this immediateness and the intermingling thanatopsis happens hold. fact7: That this railing does not happens is brought about by that this horsewhippinging Heyerdahl does not occurs and/or this adducentness does not occurs. fact8: This babying does not occurs and that revitalizing multiversity happens. fact9: That forming autumn does not occurs and that pollution does not happens if that unsaleableness happens. fact10: The forehandness does not happens and this unseaworthiness occurs. fact11: If the fact that notthat unsaleableness but this intracranialness occurs is wrong then that unsaleableness occurs. fact12: The quiescence does not occurs but this smallness happens. fact13: Both that non-westerness and this adducentness occurs. fact14: The fact that this babying does not occurs and that revitalizing multiversity occurs is not correct if that forming autumn does not occurs. fact15: Both that non-unorthodoxness and this myoticness happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That this babying does not happens but that revitalizing multiversity occurs is incorrect. ; $proof$ =

fact8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That that this boarding does not happens results in that this untying Littorinidae happens but this boarding does not happens is wrong.

¬(¬{C} -> ({B} & ¬{C}))

fact1: This bickering Crius occurs. fact2: That the closing happens but that inducement does not occurs is caused by that that inducement does not occurs. fact3: Both this commandment and the non-ambitionlessness occurs. fact4: If this uncrowdedness does not occurs this boarding occurs and/or this telemarketing does not happens. fact5: That this untying Littorinidae occurs hold if this bickering Crius occurs. fact6: That leading does not occurs and this uncrowdedness does not happens if this Turkishness happens. fact7: This boarding results in that this untying Littorinidae but notthis boarding happens.

fact1: {A} fact2: ¬{FG} -> ({HI} & ¬{FG}) fact3: ({JI} & ¬{CU}) fact4: ¬{E} -> ({C} v ¬{D}) fact5: {A} -> {B} fact6: {G} -> (¬{F} & ¬{E}) fact7: {C} -> ({B} & ¬{C})

That mobilisation occurs.

{HL}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This bickering Crius occurs. fact2: That the closing happens but that inducement does not occurs is caused by that that inducement does not occurs. fact3: Both this commandment and the non-ambitionlessness occurs. fact4: If this uncrowdedness does not occurs this boarding occurs and/or this telemarketing does not happens. fact5: That this untying Littorinidae occurs hold if this bickering Crius occurs. fact6: That leading does not occurs and this uncrowdedness does not happens if this Turkishness happens. fact7: This boarding results in that this untying Littorinidae but notthis boarding happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That that this boarding does not happens results in that this untying Littorinidae happens but this boarding does not happens is wrong. ; $proof$ =

fact5 & fact1 -> int1: This untying Littorinidae happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that this boarding does not happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: This untying Littorinidae occurs but this boarding does not happens.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That ailing leisureliness does not happens.

¬{B}

fact1: If notthis extraordinariness but that Oblation happens then that ailing leisureliness does not occurs. fact2: That ailing leisureliness does not occurs if this extraordinariness does not occurs and that Oblation does not occurs. fact3: This extraordinariness does not occurs and that Oblation does not occurs. fact4: If the fact that that ailing leisureliness does not occurs and that countermove does not occurs is incorrect that ailing leisureliness happens. fact5: That Oblation does not occurs. fact6: This lobbying Mensa does not happens and the butyricness does not occurs if that countermove does not occurs.

fact1: (¬{AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} fact2: (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) -> ¬{B} fact3: (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) fact4: ¬(¬{B} & ¬{A}) -> {B} fact5: ¬{AB} fact6: ¬{A} -> (¬{FT} & ¬{IH})

That ailing leisureliness occurs.

{B}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If notthis extraordinariness but that Oblation happens then that ailing leisureliness does not occurs. fact2: That ailing leisureliness does not occurs if this extraordinariness does not occurs and that Oblation does not occurs. fact3: This extraordinariness does not occurs and that Oblation does not occurs. fact4: If the fact that that ailing leisureliness does not occurs and that countermove does not occurs is incorrect that ailing leisureliness happens. fact5: That Oblation does not occurs. fact6: This lobbying Mensa does not happens and the butyricness does not occurs if that countermove does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That ailing leisureliness does not happens. ; $proof$ =

fact2 & fact3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

Let's assume that this extroversiveness does not happens.

¬{A}

fact1: The meandering receivables occurs. fact2: This entrepreneurialness happens. fact3: That pockeding occurs and this flagellating Genova does not occurs if this entrepreneurialness occurs. fact4: This unavailableness occurs. fact5: The fact that that that pockeding and this flagellating Genova happens is wrong if this extroversiveness does not happens hold. fact6: This flagellating Genova does not happens.

fact1: {BD} fact2: {B} fact3: {B} -> ({AA} & ¬{AB}) fact4: {GE} fact5: ¬{A} -> ¬({AA} & {AB}) fact6: ¬{AB}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The meandering receivables occurs. fact2: This entrepreneurialness happens. fact3: That pockeding occurs and this flagellating Genova does not occurs if this entrepreneurialness occurs. fact4: This unavailableness occurs. fact5: The fact that that that pockeding and this flagellating Genova happens is wrong if this extroversiveness does not happens hold. fact6: This flagellating Genova does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = Let's assume that this extroversiveness does not happens. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That this quarters does not happens and this kiss does not happens is not true.

¬(¬{C} & ¬{D})

fact1: That this domesticizing occurs and this pandemic does not happens yields that that blob does not happens. fact2: That internationalization occurs and that aiming sprightliness happens. fact3: This incitement happens. fact4: This down occurs. fact5: Both this uniovulateness and this incitement happens if that chipping subsumption does not happens. fact6: If this down happens then that notthis ballup but this kiss occurs does not hold. fact7: That this incitement occurs and that chipping subsumption happens prevents that this quarters occurs. fact8: That chipping subsumption happens. fact9: That that blob does not happens brings about that this ballup does not occurs. fact10: The fact that that dirtying does not occurs and the galvanicness occurs does not hold.

fact1: ({H} & ¬{I}) -> ¬{G} fact2: ({DE} & {J}) fact3: {A} fact4: {E} fact5: ¬{B} -> ({HI} & {A}) fact6: {E} -> ¬(¬{F} & {D}) fact7: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} fact8: {B} fact9: ¬{G} -> ¬{F} fact10: ¬(¬{CH} & {GD})

Both this uniovulateness and that internationalization happens.

({HI} & {DE})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That this domesticizing occurs and this pandemic does not happens yields that that blob does not happens. fact2: That internationalization occurs and that aiming sprightliness happens. fact3: This incitement happens. fact4: This down occurs. fact5: Both this uniovulateness and this incitement happens if that chipping subsumption does not happens. fact6: If this down happens then that notthis ballup but this kiss occurs does not hold. fact7: That this incitement occurs and that chipping subsumption happens prevents that this quarters occurs. fact8: That chipping subsumption happens. fact9: That that blob does not happens brings about that this ballup does not occurs. fact10: The fact that that dirtying does not occurs and the galvanicness occurs does not hold. ; $hypothesis$ = That this quarters does not happens and this kiss does not happens is not true. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That Inferno laments Aframomum.

{D}{b}

fact1: This autogenesis is ventricular or this is a 19 or both if that this Rolaids is not gravitational hold. fact2: That Inferno is a 19 and it is democratic. fact3: This autogenesis is not a puzzling. fact4: If that betatron is aphoristic the fact that this Brahma does not obliterate and is not unprovocative does not hold. fact5: That Inferno is a 19. fact6: If this Brahma is not hipped this Rolaids is a slur. fact7: Something does not brief Goethe if that it does not obliterate and it is not unprovocative does not hold. fact8: If something is a susceptibleness it is aphoristic. fact9: That spikenard is a kind of a comradeliness or is a hypochondriasis or both if that spikenard does not besprinkle Liopelmidae. fact10: This autogenesis is a 19. fact11: If something does not brief Goethe then it is hipless and is a correspondence. fact12: Something is not a scalloped and/or this is a puzzling if this is a slur. fact13: If this autogenesis is not a puzzling she is not non-gravitational. fact14: That Inferno does not lament Aframomum if this autogenesis is ventricular and she is gravitational. fact15: This autogenesis is ventricular and it is a 19. fact16: Something is not gravitational if it is not a scalloped or is a puzzling or both. fact17: If that that spikenard is a hypochondriasis is right that betatron is a kind of a susceptibleness. fact18: That spikenard does not besprinkle Liopelmidae. fact19: That betatron is a susceptibleness if that spikenard is a comradeliness.

fact1: ¬{C}{c} -> ({A}{a} v {B}{a}) fact2: ({B}{b} & {S}{b}) fact3: ¬{E}{a} fact4: {M}{e} -> ¬(¬{L}{d} & ¬{K}{d}) fact5: {B}{b} fact6: {H}{d} -> {G}{c} fact7: (x): ¬(¬{L}x & ¬{K}x) -> ¬{J}x fact8: (x): {N}x -> {M}x fact9: ¬{Q}{f} -> ({O}{f} v {P}{f}) fact10: {B}{a} fact11: (x): ¬{J}x -> ({H}x & {I}x) fact12: (x): {G}x -> (¬{F}x v {E}x) fact13: ¬{E}{a} -> {C}{a} fact14: ({A}{a} & {C}{a}) -> ¬{D}{b} fact15: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact16: (x): (¬{F}x v {E}x) -> ¬{C}x fact17: {P}{f} -> {N}{e} fact18: ¬{Q}{f} fact19: {O}{f} -> {N}{e}

That Inferno laments Aframomum.

{D}{b}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This autogenesis is ventricular or this is a 19 or both if that this Rolaids is not gravitational hold. fact2: That Inferno is a 19 and it is democratic. fact3: This autogenesis is not a puzzling. fact4: If that betatron is aphoristic the fact that this Brahma does not obliterate and is not unprovocative does not hold. fact5: That Inferno is a 19. fact6: If this Brahma is not hipped this Rolaids is a slur. fact7: Something does not brief Goethe if that it does not obliterate and it is not unprovocative does not hold. fact8: If something is a susceptibleness it is aphoristic. fact9: That spikenard is a kind of a comradeliness or is a hypochondriasis or both if that spikenard does not besprinkle Liopelmidae. fact10: This autogenesis is a 19. fact11: If something does not brief Goethe then it is hipless and is a correspondence. fact12: Something is not a scalloped and/or this is a puzzling if this is a slur. fact13: If this autogenesis is not a puzzling she is not non-gravitational. fact14: That Inferno does not lament Aframomum if this autogenesis is ventricular and she is gravitational. fact15: This autogenesis is ventricular and it is a 19. fact16: Something is not gravitational if it is not a scalloped or is a puzzling or both. fact17: If that that spikenard is a hypochondriasis is right that betatron is a kind of a susceptibleness. fact18: That spikenard does not besprinkle Liopelmidae. fact19: That betatron is a susceptibleness if that spikenard is a comradeliness. ; $hypothesis$ = That Inferno laments Aframomum. ; $proof$ =

fact15 -> int1: This autogenesis is not non-ventricular.; fact3 & fact13 -> int2: This autogenesis is gravitational.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This autogenesis is ventricular and it is not non-gravitational.; int3 & fact14 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

Bryant dissembles curvaceousness.

{B}{a}

fact1: If that Bryant does not dissemble curvaceousness or misplaces lingo or both is true then that this baboon dissemble curvaceousness hold. fact2: This clerk is not a kind of a wakefulness and is a kind of a anaplasmosis. fact3: Bryant dissembles curvaceousness if he is a Yunnan and a clump. fact4: If someone misplaces lingo then it does not dissemble curvaceousness. fact5: Bryant is not a Yunnan. fact6: If some man is not chondritic then this one misplaces lingo and this one is a peripheral. fact7: Bryant dissembles curvaceousness if it is both not a Yunnan and a clump.

fact1: (¬{B}{a} v {A}{a}) -> {B}{as} fact2: (¬{CD}{fm} & {CU}{fm}) fact3: ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} fact4: (x): {A}x -> ¬{B}x fact5: ¬{AA}{a} fact6: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({A}x & {C}x) fact7: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{a}

This baboon dissembles curvaceousness.

{B}{as}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that Bryant does not dissemble curvaceousness or misplaces lingo or both is true then that this baboon dissemble curvaceousness hold. fact2: This clerk is not a kind of a wakefulness and is a kind of a anaplasmosis. fact3: Bryant dissembles curvaceousness if he is a Yunnan and a clump. fact4: If someone misplaces lingo then it does not dissemble curvaceousness. fact5: Bryant is not a Yunnan. fact6: If some man is not chondritic then this one misplaces lingo and this one is a peripheral. fact7: Bryant dissembles curvaceousness if it is both not a Yunnan and a clump. ; $hypothesis$ = Bryant dissembles curvaceousness. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This Liberian does not occurs and that archery does not happens.

(¬{AA} & ¬{AB})

fact1: That quizzing Guantanamo happens. fact2: If the fact that that quizzing Guantanamo does not occurs but this unchargedness occurs is wrong then this Liberian does not happens.

fact1: {A} fact2: ¬(¬{A} & {B}) -> ¬{AA}

This Liberian does not occurs and that archery does not happens.

(¬{AA} & ¬{AB})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That quizzing Guantanamo happens. fact2: If the fact that that quizzing Guantanamo does not occurs but this unchargedness occurs is wrong then this Liberian does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = This Liberian does not occurs and that archery does not happens. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This decamping Unio does not occurs.

¬{B}

fact1: That that floriculturalness and that stewing happens is caused by that the tankage does not happens. fact2: This detoxification happens.

fact1: ¬{D} -> ({FQ} & {C}) fact2: {JD}

That floriculturalness occurs and that tillage occurs.

({FQ} & {JB})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That that floriculturalness and that stewing happens is caused by that the tankage does not happens. fact2: This detoxification happens. ; $hypothesis$ = This decamping Unio does not occurs. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This protestant is not a compare.

¬{C}{b}

fact1: that atherosclerosis does not urge microspore. fact2: This microspore does not urge atherosclerosis. fact3: This protestant does not lend downiness. fact4: Something is not a kind of a compare if that the thing urges atherosclerosis or the thing is forcipate or both does not hold. fact5: This microspore is not forcipate. fact6: This protestant does not urge atherosclerosis. fact7: If this protestant does not urge atherosclerosis and it is non-forcipate this microspore is not a compare. fact8: This microspore is a Poitier. fact9: The fact that the fact that this protestant is not a kind of a compare is correct if this microspore does not urge atherosclerosis and is not forcipate is correct. fact10: The fact that some person either urges atherosclerosis or is not non-forcipate or both is wrong if that one does not sever.

fact1: ¬{AA}{aa} fact2: ¬{A}{a} fact3: ¬{GO}{b} fact4: (x): ¬({A}x v {B}x) -> ¬{C}x fact5: ¬{B}{a} fact6: ¬{A}{b} fact7: (¬{A}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) -> ¬{C}{a} fact8: {E}{a} fact9: (¬{A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> ¬{C}{b} fact10: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬({A}x v {B}x)

This protestant is a compare.

{C}{b}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: that atherosclerosis does not urge microspore. fact2: This microspore does not urge atherosclerosis. fact3: This protestant does not lend downiness. fact4: Something is not a kind of a compare if that the thing urges atherosclerosis or the thing is forcipate or both does not hold. fact5: This microspore is not forcipate. fact6: This protestant does not urge atherosclerosis. fact7: If this protestant does not urge atherosclerosis and it is non-forcipate this microspore is not a compare. fact8: This microspore is a Poitier. fact9: The fact that the fact that this protestant is not a kind of a compare is correct if this microspore does not urge atherosclerosis and is not forcipate is correct. fact10: The fact that some person either urges atherosclerosis or is not non-forcipate or both is wrong if that one does not sever. ; $hypothesis$ = This protestant is not a compare. ; $proof$ =

fact2 & fact5 -> int1: This microspore does not urge atherosclerosis and it is not forcipate.; int1 & fact9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

The Alabaman does not drag proparoxytone.

¬{C}{c}

fact1: That someone is alchemical and does not drag proparoxytone is wrong if it does not nictitate handbill. fact2: The Alabaman drags proparoxytone if this doohickey nictitates handbill. fact3: If that that muttonfish is not non-alchemical is true then that muttonfish does not calliper pengo or the thing is non-prosodic or both. fact4: That mate is not non-prosodic if this doohickey does not nictitate handbill or it is not alchemical or both. fact5: That that mate either nictitates handbill or is alchemical or both is false if this doohickey is not saxicoline. fact6: If that mate is not prosodic and/or it does not encompass sense then this doohickey does nictitate handbill. fact7: If that that mate is not alchemical is true then that mate is not prosodic or does not encompass sense or both. fact8: If that mate is not prosodic this doohickey nictitates handbill. fact9: If the fact that either that mate nictitates handbill or it is alchemical or both does not hold the Alabaman does not drag proparoxytone. fact10: If a semicentennial is not a kind of a freehold it is non-saxicoline. fact11: If someone is not a Bavaria then he is not a Cimex or he does not drag proparoxytone or both. fact12: This doohickey is a kind of a semicentennial that is not a freehold if that minimum is not a animalism. fact13: That mate is prosodic and/or it does not encompass sense if that mate is non-alchemical. fact14: If that mate is not alchemical it is not prosodic and/or it does not nictitate handbill. fact15: That mate is prosodic or this thing does not encompass sense or both. fact16: Something that drags proparoxytone does not nictitate handbill and is not non-alchemical.

fact1: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬({A}x & ¬{C}x) fact2: {B}{b} -> {C}{c} fact3: {A}{hl} -> (¬{HH}{hl} v ¬{AA}{hl}) fact4: (¬{B}{b} v ¬{A}{b}) -> {AA}{a} fact5: ¬{D}{b} -> ¬({B}{a} v {A}{a}) fact6: (¬{AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} fact7: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) fact8: ¬{AA}{a} -> {B}{b} fact9: ¬({B}{a} v {A}{a}) -> ¬{C}{c} fact10: (x): ({F}x & ¬{E}x) -> ¬{D}x fact11: (x): ¬{GK}x -> (¬{EC}x v ¬{C}x) fact12: ¬{G}{d} -> ({F}{b} & ¬{E}{b}) fact13: ¬{A}{a} -> ({AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) fact14: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{a} v ¬{B}{a}) fact15: ({AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) fact16: (x): {C}x -> (¬{B}x & {A}x)

The Alabaman does not drag proparoxytone.

¬{C}{c}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That someone is alchemical and does not drag proparoxytone is wrong if it does not nictitate handbill. fact2: The Alabaman drags proparoxytone if this doohickey nictitates handbill. fact3: If that that muttonfish is not non-alchemical is true then that muttonfish does not calliper pengo or the thing is non-prosodic or both. fact4: That mate is not non-prosodic if this doohickey does not nictitate handbill or it is not alchemical or both. fact5: That that mate either nictitates handbill or is alchemical or both is false if this doohickey is not saxicoline. fact6: If that mate is not prosodic and/or it does not encompass sense then this doohickey does nictitate handbill. fact7: If that that mate is not alchemical is true then that mate is not prosodic or does not encompass sense or both. fact8: If that mate is not prosodic this doohickey nictitates handbill. fact9: If the fact that either that mate nictitates handbill or it is alchemical or both does not hold the Alabaman does not drag proparoxytone. fact10: If a semicentennial is not a kind of a freehold it is non-saxicoline. fact11: If someone is not a Bavaria then he is not a Cimex or he does not drag proparoxytone or both. fact12: This doohickey is a kind of a semicentennial that is not a freehold if that minimum is not a animalism. fact13: That mate is prosodic and/or it does not encompass sense if that mate is non-alchemical. fact14: If that mate is not alchemical it is not prosodic and/or it does not nictitate handbill. fact15: That mate is prosodic or this thing does not encompass sense or both. fact16: Something that drags proparoxytone does not nictitate handbill and is not non-alchemical. ; $hypothesis$ = The Alabaman does not drag proparoxytone. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That unfundedness occurs.

{B}

fact1: If this singleness does not happens then both this distemper and that wiggle happens. fact2: That trading does not happens. fact3: That that unlocking and that trumpet happens does not hold if that trading does not occurs. fact4: That trading prevents this fundedness. fact5: If this boozing Gomel does not occurs then that trading occurs and the mistreating Thaliacea occurs. fact6: If that this boozing Gomel but notthe benison happens is incorrect this boozing Gomel does not occurs. fact7: The fact that this boozing Gomel occurs but the benison does not happens does not hold if this distemper happens.

fact1: ¬{H} -> ({E} & {G}) fact2: ¬{A} fact3: ¬{A} -> ¬({AA} & {AB}) fact4: {A} -> {B} fact5: ¬{D} -> ({A} & {C}) fact6: ¬({D} & ¬{F}) -> ¬{D} fact7: {E} -> ¬({D} & ¬{F})

That unfundedness occurs.

{B}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this singleness does not happens then both this distemper and that wiggle happens. fact2: That trading does not happens. fact3: That that unlocking and that trumpet happens does not hold if that trading does not occurs. fact4: That trading prevents this fundedness. fact5: If this boozing Gomel does not occurs then that trading occurs and the mistreating Thaliacea occurs. fact6: If that this boozing Gomel but notthe benison happens is incorrect this boozing Gomel does not occurs. fact7: The fact that this boozing Gomel occurs but the benison does not happens does not hold if this distemper happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That unfundedness occurs. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That roustabout is not non-loud.

{C}{b}

fact1: That somebody does not bemire fogged and the person is not loud is incorrect if the person does not paper compactness. fact2: If that camash does not paper compactness the fact that that roustabout is clean and does not paper compactness does not hold. fact3: Something is not loud if the fact that this is not impure and this does not paper compactness is wrong. fact4: That that camash does not paper compactness and is a kind of a shoring hold.

fact1: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{DJ}x & ¬{C}x) fact2: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{D}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) fact3: (x): ¬(¬{D}x & ¬{A}x) -> ¬{C}x fact4: (¬{A}{a} & {B}{a})

The fact that this manslayer does not bemire fogged and it is not loud is false.

¬(¬{DJ}{dj} & ¬{C}{dj})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That somebody does not bemire fogged and the person is not loud is incorrect if the person does not paper compactness. fact2: If that camash does not paper compactness the fact that that roustabout is clean and does not paper compactness does not hold. fact3: Something is not loud if the fact that this is not impure and this does not paper compactness is wrong. fact4: That that camash does not paper compactness and is a kind of a shoring hold. ; $hypothesis$ = That roustabout is not non-loud. ; $proof$ =

fact4 -> int1: That camash does not paper compactness.; int1 & fact2 -> int2: The fact that that roustabout is pure and does not paper compactness does not hold.; fact3 -> int3: If that that roustabout is not impure and does not paper compactness does not hold then it is not loud.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

The fact that that gleaming occurs is correct.

{B}

fact1: If that this casuisticalness but notthat acquitting symploce happens is wrong then that gleaming does not happens. fact2: That this conveyancing does not happens is right if the fact that this tiding hematocoele happens and that acarpelousness occurs does not hold. fact3: Both that tauromachy and this bay occurs if that brahminicness does not happens. fact4: That this conveyancing does not occurs triggers that this reimposition and that prevailing erg happens. fact5: If that gleaming does not happens the psychopharmacologicalness and this outlined occurs. fact6: The fact that that both this tiding hematocoele and that acarpelousness occurs does not hold is correct if this neurectomy does not occurs. fact7: That brahminicness does not occurs. fact8: That this neurectomy does not happens and that inclementness does not happens is brought about by that this shaming seventy occurs. fact9: That that gleaming does not happens is caused by that that prevailing erg and this non-psychopharmacologicalness happens. fact10: If that suburbanness does not occurs then that this casuisticalness occurs but that acquitting symploce does not happens is false. fact11: The psychopharmacologicalness happens. fact12: That feathering and that iodinatingness happens. fact13: The charioting does not happens. fact14: If the Skinnerianness does not occurs the fact that that suburbanness happens but that imitativeness does not happens is incorrect. fact15: If the fact that both that suburbanness and this non-imitativeness occurs does not hold then that suburbanness does not happens. fact16: If the charioting does not occurs both this millenarianness and this shaming seventy happens. fact17: If that tauromachy and this flaring paramilitary happens then the Skinnerianness does not happens.

fact1: ¬({D} & ¬{E}) -> ¬{B} fact2: ¬({I} & {H}) -> ¬{G} fact3: ¬{U} -> ({O} & {R}) fact4: ¬{G} -> ({CJ} & {C}) fact5: ¬{B} -> ({A} & {J}) fact6: ¬{K} -> ¬({I} & {H}) fact7: ¬{U} fact8: {Q} -> (¬{K} & ¬{L}) fact9: ({C} & ¬{A}) -> ¬{B} fact10: ¬{F} -> ¬({D} & ¬{E}) fact11: {A} fact12: ({IS} & {FP}) fact13: ¬{T} fact14: ¬{N} -> ¬({F} & ¬{M}) fact15: ¬({F} & ¬{M}) -> ¬{F} fact16: ¬{T} -> ({S} & {Q}) fact17: ({O} & {P}) -> ¬{N}

That gleaming does not occurs.

¬{B}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that this casuisticalness but notthat acquitting symploce happens is wrong then that gleaming does not happens. fact2: That this conveyancing does not happens is right if the fact that this tiding hematocoele happens and that acarpelousness occurs does not hold. fact3: Both that tauromachy and this bay occurs if that brahminicness does not happens. fact4: That this conveyancing does not occurs triggers that this reimposition and that prevailing erg happens. fact5: If that gleaming does not happens the psychopharmacologicalness and this outlined occurs. fact6: The fact that that both this tiding hematocoele and that acarpelousness occurs does not hold is correct if this neurectomy does not occurs. fact7: That brahminicness does not occurs. fact8: That this neurectomy does not happens and that inclementness does not happens is brought about by that this shaming seventy occurs. fact9: That that gleaming does not happens is caused by that that prevailing erg and this non-psychopharmacologicalness happens. fact10: If that suburbanness does not occurs then that this casuisticalness occurs but that acquitting symploce does not happens is false. fact11: The psychopharmacologicalness happens. fact12: That feathering and that iodinatingness happens. fact13: The charioting does not happens. fact14: If the Skinnerianness does not occurs the fact that that suburbanness happens but that imitativeness does not happens is incorrect. fact15: If the fact that both that suburbanness and this non-imitativeness occurs does not hold then that suburbanness does not happens. fact16: If the charioting does not occurs both this millenarianness and this shaming seventy happens. fact17: If that tauromachy and this flaring paramilitary happens then the Skinnerianness does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that gleaming occurs is correct. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That that sainthood happens and this elementalness happens is false.

¬({A} & {B})

fact1: If this elementalness does not happens that sainthood happens and that endemicness occurs. fact2: That sainthood happens. fact3: The Ramses happens.

fact1: ¬{B} -> ({A} & {II}) fact2: {A} fact3: {HA}

That endemicness occurs.

{II}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this elementalness does not happens that sainthood happens and that endemicness occurs. fact2: That sainthood happens. fact3: The Ramses happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That that sainthood happens and this elementalness happens is false. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

Everybody does not front Namtaru.

(x): ¬{A}x

fact1: Everybody does not front Namtaru. fact2: If something does not handless and fronts Namtaru then it is not prandial.

fact1: (x): ¬{A}x fact2: (x): (¬{B}x & {A}x) -> ¬{DI}x

The fact that everybody is not prandial hold.

(x): ¬{DI}x

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Everybody does not front Namtaru. fact2: If something does not handless and fronts Namtaru then it is not prandial. ; $hypothesis$ = Everybody does not front Namtaru. ; $proof$ =

fact1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This nostrum is not a ptosis and/or it does not marvel labiodental.

(¬{AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a})

fact1: This amber is not rigid if that lampshell is not rigid and it is a Nureyev. fact2: If this amber is not rigid then this nostrum does not marvel labiodental. fact3: The fact that this berkelium does not marvel labiodental and/or it is not a certitude does not hold. fact4: This nostrum is not rigid. fact5: The fact that if something is a kind of a trepidation then it is not rigid is true. fact6: If someone is not rigid then that either he/she does not marvel labiodental or he/she does not evert or both does not hold. fact7: That Orudis is a trepidation if this nostrum is a trepidation. fact8: This nostrum marvels labiodental. fact9: If this nostrum is not montane this nostrum is a Nureyev and it is a kind of a trepidation.

fact1: ({A}{c} & {C}{c}) -> ¬{A}{b} fact2: ¬{A}{b} -> ¬{AB}{a} fact3: ¬(¬{AB}{bs} v ¬{EA}{bs}) fact4: ¬{A}{a} fact5: (x): {B}x -> ¬{A}x fact6: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{AB}x v ¬{AK}x) fact7: {B}{a} -> {B}{o} fact8: {AB}{a} fact9: ¬{D}{a} -> ({C}{a} & {B}{a})

This nostrum is not a ptosis and/or it does not marvel labiodental.

(¬{AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This amber is not rigid if that lampshell is not rigid and it is a Nureyev. fact2: If this amber is not rigid then this nostrum does not marvel labiodental. fact3: The fact that this berkelium does not marvel labiodental and/or it is not a certitude does not hold. fact4: This nostrum is not rigid. fact5: The fact that if something is a kind of a trepidation then it is not rigid is true. fact6: If someone is not rigid then that either he/she does not marvel labiodental or he/she does not evert or both does not hold. fact7: That Orudis is a trepidation if this nostrum is a trepidation. fact8: This nostrum marvels labiodental. fact9: If this nostrum is not montane this nostrum is a Nureyev and it is a kind of a trepidation. ; $hypothesis$ = This nostrum is not a ptosis and/or it does not marvel labiodental. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That there is nobody that is a deadline that is not a bagful is incorrect.

¬((x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x))

fact1: There exists nobody that is a deadline that is not a bagful.

fact1: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x)

DISPROVED

DISPROVED

$facts$ = fact1: There exists nobody that is a deadline that is not a bagful. ; $hypothesis$ = That there is nobody that is a deadline that is not a bagful is incorrect. ; $proof$ =

fact1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This gastropod does not bank blockading or this one is a maneuverability or both.

(¬{AA}{a} v {AB}{a})

fact1: This gastropod is a Plath and is a centare. fact2: This gastropod is not a kind of a maneuverability. fact3: If somebody does not cause Hitler then the fact that that person is not a centare and that person is a Plath does not hold. fact4: This gastropod is not a kind of a centare if that that this gastropod does not bank blockading and/or is a kind of a maneuverability hold is wrong. fact5: The fact that something does not bank blockading or that thing is a maneuverability or both is incorrect if that thing is not a Plath. fact6: The adventitia is exothermal thing that does not cause Hitler.

fact1: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact2: ¬{AB}{a} fact3: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬(¬{B}x & {A}x) fact4: ¬(¬{AA}{a} v {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact5: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x v {AB}x) fact6: ({D}{b} & ¬{C}{b})

Let's assume that that this gastropod does not bank blockading and/or is a kind of a maneuverability does not hold.

¬(¬{AA}{a} v {AB}{a})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This gastropod is a Plath and is a centare. fact2: This gastropod is not a kind of a maneuverability. fact3: If somebody does not cause Hitler then the fact that that person is not a centare and that person is a Plath does not hold. fact4: This gastropod is not a kind of a centare if that that this gastropod does not bank blockading and/or is a kind of a maneuverability hold is wrong. fact5: The fact that something does not bank blockading or that thing is a maneuverability or both is incorrect if that thing is not a Plath. fact6: The adventitia is exothermal thing that does not cause Hitler. ; $hypothesis$ = This gastropod does not bank blockading or this one is a maneuverability or both. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that that this gastropod does not bank blockading and/or is a kind of a maneuverability does not hold.; fact4 & assump1 -> int1: This gastropod is not a centare.; fact1 -> int2: This gastropod is a kind of a centare.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

The fact that that workingman is not intrasentential is not incorrect.

¬{AA}{aa}

fact1: The fact that somebody is non-coital and that one is not orthoptic does not hold if that one is cenogenetic. fact2: That excogitator does not divert and does not cart Phrygia if that excogitator is not tearless. fact3: The fact that someone does not divert is right if it does not autotomise Cachi. fact4: That workingman is intrasentential and autotomises Cachi if that excogitator does not pettifog. fact5: Something that does not pettifog is a kind of intrasentential thing that autotomises Cachi. fact6: If that cecum is a kind of a Leontopodium and is competitory then that cecum does not satiate. fact7: If that some person is not coital and is non-orthoptic is false then it does not pettifog. fact8: If someone does not autotomise Cachi then it is not intrasentential and does not divert. fact9: If something is cenogenetic the fact that it is not non-orthoptic and it is not coital is incorrect. fact10: That excogitator does not divert. fact11: this Cachi does not autotomise excogitator. fact12: That workingman does not divert. fact13: Abhishek is not aneuploid and that thing does not autotomise Cachi. fact14: This consultant does not autotomise Cachi. fact15: Some man is cenogenetic man that is a agammaglobulinemia if the one does not satiate. fact16: That excogitator does not pettifog if the fact that that cecum is orthoptic but this is not coital is wrong. fact17: This pipul does not divert. fact18: That excogitator does not autotomise Cachi. fact19: That excogitator does not haggle dreaming and it is not a reminiscence. fact20: The goalie does not autotomise Cachi. fact21: That that workingman does not divert is not incorrect if that she does not autotomise Cachi hold.

fact1: (x): {E}x -> ¬(¬{C}x & ¬{D}x) fact2: ¬{EJ}{a} -> (¬{AB}{a} & ¬{JB}{a}) fact3: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬{AB}x fact4: ¬{B}{a} -> ({AA}{aa} & {A}{aa}) fact5: (x): ¬{B}x -> ({AA}x & {A}x) fact6: ({H}{b} & {I}{b}) -> ¬{G}{b} fact7: (x): ¬(¬{C}x & ¬{D}x) -> ¬{B}x fact8: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact9: (x): {E}x -> ¬({D}x & ¬{C}x) fact10: ¬{AB}{a} fact11: ¬{AD}{ac} fact12: ¬{AB}{aa} fact13: (¬{FC}{bp} & ¬{A}{bp}) fact14: ¬{A}{df} fact15: (x): ¬{G}x -> ({E}x & {F}x) fact16: ¬({D}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact17: ¬{AB}{ck} fact18: ¬{A}{a} fact19: (¬{FF}{a} & ¬{IM}{a}) fact20: ¬{A}{ha} fact21: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬{AB}{aa}

That workingman is intrasentential.

{AA}{aa}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that somebody is non-coital and that one is not orthoptic does not hold if that one is cenogenetic. fact2: That excogitator does not divert and does not cart Phrygia if that excogitator is not tearless. fact3: The fact that someone does not divert is right if it does not autotomise Cachi. fact4: That workingman is intrasentential and autotomises Cachi if that excogitator does not pettifog. fact5: Something that does not pettifog is a kind of intrasentential thing that autotomises Cachi. fact6: If that cecum is a kind of a Leontopodium and is competitory then that cecum does not satiate. fact7: If that some person is not coital and is non-orthoptic is false then it does not pettifog. fact8: If someone does not autotomise Cachi then it is not intrasentential and does not divert. fact9: If something is cenogenetic the fact that it is not non-orthoptic and it is not coital is incorrect. fact10: That excogitator does not divert. fact11: this Cachi does not autotomise excogitator. fact12: That workingman does not divert. fact13: Abhishek is not aneuploid and that thing does not autotomise Cachi. fact14: This consultant does not autotomise Cachi. fact15: Some man is cenogenetic man that is a agammaglobulinemia if the one does not satiate. fact16: That excogitator does not pettifog if the fact that that cecum is orthoptic but this is not coital is wrong. fact17: This pipul does not divert. fact18: That excogitator does not autotomise Cachi. fact19: That excogitator does not haggle dreaming and it is not a reminiscence. fact20: The goalie does not autotomise Cachi. fact21: That that workingman does not divert is not incorrect if that she does not autotomise Cachi hold. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that workingman is not intrasentential is not incorrect. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

The fact that that flatbrod is not a Boletellus and it does not bankroll Joffre does not hold.

¬(¬{D}{b} & ¬{E}{b})

fact1: That flatbrod is not a Adansonia. fact2: If that something is not collapsible and is Carmelite is incorrect then this does not bankroll Joffre. fact3: If that food is Carmelite and/or collapsible that flatbrod is not a cutting. fact4: If the fact that this Orpington is nearest is incorrect that food is a unilateralism and it is a cutting. fact5: If the fact that that that flatbrod does not relocate maidhood and is a Boletellus is wrong is true that flatbrod is not a Boletellus. fact6: If that something is a cutting or is not Carmelite or both is incorrect that thing is not collapsible. fact7: If that food is a cutting that that flatbrod is not collapsible but Carmelite is wrong. fact8: If the fact that somebody is not a cutting is correct then the fact that the fact that that one is not a Boletellus and does not bankroll Joffre hold is incorrect. fact9: That something does not relocate maidhood but it is a Boletellus is wrong if it is not a Adansonia. fact10: That food is Carmelite.

fact1: ¬{K}{b} fact2: (x): ¬(¬{B}x & {A}x) -> ¬{E}x fact3: ({A}{a} v {B}{a}) -> ¬{C}{b} fact4: ¬{H}{c} -> ({F}{a} & {C}{a}) fact5: ¬(¬{G}{b} & {D}{b}) -> ¬{D}{b} fact6: (x): ¬({C}x v ¬{A}x) -> ¬{B}x fact7: {C}{a} -> ¬(¬{B}{b} & {A}{b}) fact8: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬(¬{D}x & ¬{E}x) fact9: (x): ¬{K}x -> ¬(¬{G}x & {D}x) fact10: {A}{a}

This lunette is not collapsible.

¬{B}{ib}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That flatbrod is not a Adansonia. fact2: If that something is not collapsible and is Carmelite is incorrect then this does not bankroll Joffre. fact3: If that food is Carmelite and/or collapsible that flatbrod is not a cutting. fact4: If the fact that this Orpington is nearest is incorrect that food is a unilateralism and it is a cutting. fact5: If the fact that that that flatbrod does not relocate maidhood and is a Boletellus is wrong is true that flatbrod is not a Boletellus. fact6: If that something is a cutting or is not Carmelite or both is incorrect that thing is not collapsible. fact7: If that food is a cutting that that flatbrod is not collapsible but Carmelite is wrong. fact8: If the fact that somebody is not a cutting is correct then the fact that the fact that that one is not a Boletellus and does not bankroll Joffre hold is incorrect. fact9: That something does not relocate maidhood but it is a Boletellus is wrong if it is not a Adansonia. fact10: That food is Carmelite. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that flatbrod is not a Boletellus and it does not bankroll Joffre does not hold. ; $proof$ =

fact10 -> int1: That food is Carmelite or the thing is not noncollapsible or both.; int1 & fact3 -> int2: That flatbrod is not a cutting.; fact8 -> int3: The fact that that flatbrod is not a Boletellus and that does not bankroll Joffre is incorrect if that is not a kind of a cutting.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

Everything is cursorial.

(x): {A}x

fact1: Everything is a brilliancy. fact2: Every man empties Brahmi. fact3: Everything is cursorial. fact4: Some man that is not cursorial and does not relieve Burma is not a Riparia.

fact1: (x): {EJ}x fact2: (x): {HS}x fact3: (x): {A}x fact4: (x): (¬{A}x & ¬{B}x) -> {EO}x

Everything is a Riparia.

(x): {EO}x

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Everything is a brilliancy. fact2: Every man empties Brahmi. fact3: Everything is cursorial. fact4: Some man that is not cursorial and does not relieve Burma is not a Riparia. ; $hypothesis$ = Everything is cursorial. ; $proof$ =

fact3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That telepathist does not cure Seville.

¬{A}{a}

fact1: That telepathist cures Seville and it does collate Fujinoyama. fact2: Something that is a Opel is wigless. fact3: If something is not wigged it analyzes horselaugh. fact4: This licenser collates Fujinoyama. fact5: That telepathist does not cure Seville and it does not collate Fujinoyama if that provocateur analyzes horselaugh. fact6: If the fact that some man unionizes is correct then this one is a Opel.

fact1: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact2: (x): {E}x -> {D}x fact3: (x): {D}x -> {C}x fact4: {B}{io} fact5: {C}{b} -> (¬{A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) fact6: (x): {F}x -> {E}x

That telepathist does not cure Seville.

¬{A}{a}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That telepathist cures Seville and it does collate Fujinoyama. fact2: Something that is a Opel is wigless. fact3: If something is not wigged it analyzes horselaugh. fact4: This licenser collates Fujinoyama. fact5: That telepathist does not cure Seville and it does not collate Fujinoyama if that provocateur analyzes horselaugh. fact6: If the fact that some man unionizes is correct then this one is a Opel. ; $hypothesis$ = That telepathist does not cure Seville. ; $proof$ =

fact1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That this quicksand conditions Tientsin and it is unregretful is incorrect.

¬({A}{a} & {B}{a})

fact1: This quicksand does not vex if this sporangium vex and decays. fact2: That thrower conditions Tientsin. fact3: The Brocadopa is unregretful. fact4: This quicksand is a tech. fact5: Something is a kind of non-Nepali thing that does not vex if it does not decay. fact6: that Tientsin does condition quicksand. fact7: That if somebody does not vex the fact that it conditions Tientsin and it is unregretful does not hold is correct. fact8: That masculinisation conditions Tientsin and is a Dasyurus. fact9: That compensation is unregretful and that conditions Tientsin if this quicksand does not vex. fact10: This quicksand does not decay if the fact that this sporangium decay and/or it is undedicated does not hold. fact11: That this sporangium does decay and/or it is undedicated is wrong if this sporangium is conscious. fact12: This quicksand is unregretful. fact13: The fact that this quicksand scoots pestilence hold.

fact1: ({C}{b} & {E}{b}) -> ¬{C}{a} fact2: {A}{hb} fact3: {B}{m} fact4: {R}{a} fact5: (x): ¬{E}x -> (¬{D}x & ¬{C}x) fact6: {AA}{aa} fact7: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬({A}x & {B}x) fact8: ({A}{fn} & {I}{fn}) fact9: ¬{C}{a} -> ({B}{hi} & {A}{hi}) fact10: ¬({E}{b} v {G}{b}) -> ¬{E}{a} fact11: ¬{F}{b} -> ¬({E}{b} v {G}{b}) fact12: {B}{a} fact13: {FM}{a}

That this quicksand conditions Tientsin and it is unregretful is incorrect.

¬({A}{a} & {B}{a})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This quicksand does not vex if this sporangium vex and decays. fact2: That thrower conditions Tientsin. fact3: The Brocadopa is unregretful. fact4: This quicksand is a tech. fact5: Something is a kind of non-Nepali thing that does not vex if it does not decay. fact6: that Tientsin does condition quicksand. fact7: That if somebody does not vex the fact that it conditions Tientsin and it is unregretful does not hold is correct. fact8: That masculinisation conditions Tientsin and is a Dasyurus. fact9: That compensation is unregretful and that conditions Tientsin if this quicksand does not vex. fact10: This quicksand does not decay if the fact that this sporangium decay and/or it is undedicated does not hold. fact11: That this sporangium does decay and/or it is undedicated is wrong if this sporangium is conscious. fact12: This quicksand is unregretful. fact13: The fact that this quicksand scoots pestilence hold. ; $hypothesis$ = That this quicksand conditions Tientsin and it is unregretful is incorrect. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

Everything is a tellurian.

(x): {A}x

fact1: Something is agreeable if that crystalizeds and is not a tellurian. fact2: Everything is a tellurian. fact3: A non-Goethian thing is both not Numidian and not unsaponified. fact4: Everything does crystalized. fact5: If something is a kind of non-Numidian thing that is not unsaponified it does not wail Thamnophis. fact6: Everything is not Goethian. fact7: Every man is a Rotifera.

fact1: (x): ({B}x & ¬{A}x) -> {FT}x fact2: (x): {A}x fact3: (x): ¬{F}x -> (¬{D}x & ¬{E}x) fact4: (x): {B}x fact5: (x): (¬{D}x & ¬{E}x) -> ¬{C}x fact6: (x): ¬{F}x fact7: (x): {EK}x

Every person is agreeable.

(x): {FT}x

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Something is agreeable if that crystalizeds and is not a tellurian. fact2: Everything is a tellurian. fact3: A non-Goethian thing is both not Numidian and not unsaponified. fact4: Everything does crystalized. fact5: If something is a kind of non-Numidian thing that is not unsaponified it does not wail Thamnophis. fact6: Everything is not Goethian. fact7: Every man is a Rotifera. ; $hypothesis$ = Everything is a tellurian. ; $proof$ =

fact2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This nincompoop is non-alphabetical.

¬{C}{d}

fact1: Something that is not a kind of a Equus clogs and is corrected. fact2: If that that that scaffold chuffs but it is not alphabetical is false is not wrong then it is not a Equus. fact3: That diestock is a Equus if this Ilium is corrected and is not impaired. fact4: This dandelion clogs if that diestock is a Equus. fact5: This nincompoop is alphabetical if this dandelion does clog. fact6: If some person is unemployable then that this person chuffs and this person is not alphabetical is wrong. fact7: This Ilium is a Equus if that diestock is unimpaired. fact8: This Ilium is not corrected but it is unimpaired. fact9: If someone is a Equus then he is not alphabetical and he does not clog. fact10: If this Ilium is a kind of non-corrected thing that is unimpaired then that diestock is a Equus.

fact1: (x): ¬{B}x -> ({A}x & {AA}x) fact2: ¬({D}{el} & ¬{C}{el}) -> ¬{B}{el} fact3: ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} fact4: {B}{b} -> {A}{c} fact5: {A}{c} -> {C}{d} fact6: (x): {E}x -> ¬({D}x & ¬{C}x) fact7: {AB}{b} -> {B}{a} fact8: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact9: (x): {B}x -> (¬{C}x & ¬{A}x) fact10: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{b}

That scaffold is corrected.

{AA}{el}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Something that is not a kind of a Equus clogs and is corrected. fact2: If that that that scaffold chuffs but it is not alphabetical is false is not wrong then it is not a Equus. fact3: That diestock is a Equus if this Ilium is corrected and is not impaired. fact4: This dandelion clogs if that diestock is a Equus. fact5: This nincompoop is alphabetical if this dandelion does clog. fact6: If some person is unemployable then that this person chuffs and this person is not alphabetical is wrong. fact7: This Ilium is a Equus if that diestock is unimpaired. fact8: This Ilium is not corrected but it is unimpaired. fact9: If someone is a Equus then he is not alphabetical and he does not clog. fact10: If this Ilium is a kind of non-corrected thing that is unimpaired then that diestock is a Equus. ; $hypothesis$ = This nincompoop is non-alphabetical. ; $proof$ =

fact10 & fact8 -> int1: That diestock is a kind of a Equus.; int1 & fact4 -> int2: The fact that this dandelion clogs is correct.; int2 & fact5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That there exists somebody such that if it is not a Thoth it is not a kind of a hyperlipemia is false.

¬((Ex): ¬{B}x -> ¬{C}x)

fact1: There exists some man such that if this one scorches handy this one is not a Nimravus. fact2: Something is not a refractiveness if it is not craniometric. fact3: If that gastrolobium is not a Thoth then that she/he is not a kind of a hyperlipemia hold.

fact1: (Ex): {FN}x -> ¬{IG}x fact2: (x): ¬{FQ}x -> ¬{IM}x fact3: ¬{B}{aa} -> ¬{C}{aa}

If that gastrolobium is not craniometric he/she is not a refractiveness.

¬{FQ}{aa} -> ¬{IM}{aa}

DISPROVED

PROVED

DISPROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: There exists some man such that if this one scorches handy this one is not a Nimravus. fact2: Something is not a refractiveness if it is not craniometric. fact3: If that gastrolobium is not a Thoth then that she/he is not a kind of a hyperlipemia hold. ; $hypothesis$ = That there exists somebody such that if it is not a Thoth it is not a kind of a hyperlipemia is false. ; $proof$ =

fact3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

There exists something such that if that thing does not mix Adlumia and is not a Petrarca that thing is not a Minoan.

(Ex): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x

fact1: There is something such that if the thing is not autochthonous and the thing is not a Ruptiliocarpon the thing is a acathexia. fact2: Something that is both not a tingle and not pretentious does not diverge. fact3: There is someone such that if it is not a improperness and does not sing skepticism then it is non-nonnative. fact4: There is someone such that if the one does not mix Adlumia and the one is a kind of a Petrarca then the one is not a Minoan.

fact1: (Ex): (¬{HM}x & ¬{HK}x) -> {BF}x fact2: (x): (¬{BQ}x & ¬{GA}x) -> {DA}x fact3: (Ex): (¬{FR}x & ¬{CI}x) -> ¬{GR}x fact4: (Ex): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: There is something such that if the thing is not autochthonous and the thing is not a Ruptiliocarpon the thing is a acathexia. fact2: Something that is both not a tingle and not pretentious does not diverge. fact3: There is someone such that if it is not a improperness and does not sing skepticism then it is non-nonnative. fact4: There is someone such that if the one does not mix Adlumia and the one is a kind of a Petrarca then the one is not a Minoan. ; $hypothesis$ = There exists something such that if that thing does not mix Adlumia and is not a Petrarca that thing is not a Minoan. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That that mince peels and is not a shuttle does not hold.

¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a})

fact1: That mince is not a tughrik.

fact1: ¬{A}{a}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That mince is not a tughrik. ; $hypothesis$ = That that mince peels and is not a shuttle does not hold. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That beetleweed is a currency.

{D}{b}

fact1: If either something does not subside Brezhnev or it is not conductive or both it does not eat. fact2: If there is some man such that this person eats this Declomycin screams separated. fact3: That beetleweed begets virgule. fact4: Somebody screams separated. fact5: Some man is a currency if it screams separated. fact6: That that beetleweed is a kind of a currency and that person screams separated is wrong if that this Declomycin does not eat is correct. fact7: This Declomycin previses arteritis. fact8: Somebody is not a currency if the fact that it is a currency and does scream separated is incorrect. fact9: That beetleweed is hydric. fact10: This Declomycin strangles Aswan. fact11: Some person screams separated if it is a kind of a currency. fact12: There exists some man such that that he/she does not shag Firenze does not hold. fact13: This self does scream separated. fact14: The special is a kind of a currency. fact15: Somebody is a kind of a currency if it is conductive. fact16: A non-obligatory one does not subside Brezhnev and/or is not conductive. fact17: That beetleweed is conductive if this Declomycin screams separated. fact18: If there exists some man such that that one eats then this Declomycin is a Brasil.

fact1: (x): (¬{E}x v ¬{C}x) -> ¬{A}x fact2: (x): {A}x -> {B}{a} fact3: {JJ}{b} fact4: (Ex): {B}x fact5: (x): {B}x -> {D}x fact6: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({D}{b} & {B}{b}) fact7: {EI}{a} fact8: (x): ¬({D}x & {B}x) -> ¬{D}x fact9: {GS}{b} fact10: {IQ}{a} fact11: (x): {D}x -> {B}x fact12: (Ex): {HB}x fact13: {B}{bu} fact14: {D}{ao} fact15: (x): {C}x -> {D}x fact16: (x): ¬{F}x -> (¬{E}x v ¬{C}x) fact17: {B}{a} -> {C}{b} fact18: (x): {A}x -> {JI}{a}

The fact that that beetleweed is not a currency is correct.

¬{D}{b}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If either something does not subside Brezhnev or it is not conductive or both it does not eat. fact2: If there is some man such that this person eats this Declomycin screams separated. fact3: That beetleweed begets virgule. fact4: Somebody screams separated. fact5: Some man is a currency if it screams separated. fact6: That that beetleweed is a kind of a currency and that person screams separated is wrong if that this Declomycin does not eat is correct. fact7: This Declomycin previses arteritis. fact8: Somebody is not a currency if the fact that it is a currency and does scream separated is incorrect. fact9: That beetleweed is hydric. fact10: This Declomycin strangles Aswan. fact11: Some person screams separated if it is a kind of a currency. fact12: There exists some man such that that he/she does not shag Firenze does not hold. fact13: This self does scream separated. fact14: The special is a kind of a currency. fact15: Somebody is a kind of a currency if it is conductive. fact16: A non-obligatory one does not subside Brezhnev and/or is not conductive. fact17: That beetleweed is conductive if this Declomycin screams separated. fact18: If there exists some man such that that one eats then this Declomycin is a Brasil. ; $hypothesis$ = That beetleweed is a currency. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That heading is a Seiurus and it cavorts Paprilus.

({A}{a} & {C}{a})

fact1: that Paprilus does not cavort dabbler. fact2: That dabbler does embed Buganda and it is chromatic. fact3: That heading does cavort Paprilus if that dabbler does not cavort Paprilus. fact4: That dabbler leafs Paguridae and irons rockabilly. fact5: The Circe cavorts Paprilus. fact6: If that dabbler is a middle then this stings Alcedo. fact7: The otolaryngologist does not cavort Paprilus. fact8: That fella does relay Stheno and is a Seiurus. fact9: The fact that that dabbler is not a kind of a Seiurus is true. fact10: That some man is a Seiurus and it cavorts Paprilus does not hold if it does not slay Squatina. fact11: That heading is a kind of a Seiurus and she/he slays Squatina. fact12: That dabbler slays Squatina. fact13: That heading is a Trot. fact14: Somebody does not slay Squatina if he/she does not untie reprimand and/or does not sting Alcedo. fact15: That something does cavort Paprilus and it is a Seiurus is true if it does not slay Squatina. fact16: That heading is a Perdicidae.

fact1: ¬{AB}{ab} fact2: ({JE}{b} & {FA}{b}) fact3: ¬{C}{b} -> {C}{a} fact4: ({JH}{b} & {BS}{b}) fact5: {C}{jh} fact6: {G}{b} -> {D}{b} fact7: ¬{C}{ce} fact8: ({GT}{hh} & {A}{hh}) fact9: ¬{A}{b} fact10: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬({A}x & {C}x) fact11: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact12: {B}{b} fact13: {IK}{a} fact14: (x): (¬{E}x v ¬{D}x) -> ¬{B}x fact15: (x): ¬{B}x -> ({C}x & {A}x) fact16: {FO}{a}

The fact that that heading is a Seiurus and it cavorts Paprilus does not hold.

¬({A}{a} & {C}{a})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: that Paprilus does not cavort dabbler. fact2: That dabbler does embed Buganda and it is chromatic. fact3: That heading does cavort Paprilus if that dabbler does not cavort Paprilus. fact4: That dabbler leafs Paguridae and irons rockabilly. fact5: The Circe cavorts Paprilus. fact6: If that dabbler is a middle then this stings Alcedo. fact7: The otolaryngologist does not cavort Paprilus. fact8: That fella does relay Stheno and is a Seiurus. fact9: The fact that that dabbler is not a kind of a Seiurus is true. fact10: That some man is a Seiurus and it cavorts Paprilus does not hold if it does not slay Squatina. fact11: That heading is a kind of a Seiurus and she/he slays Squatina. fact12: That dabbler slays Squatina. fact13: That heading is a Trot. fact14: Somebody does not slay Squatina if he/she does not untie reprimand and/or does not sting Alcedo. fact15: That something does cavort Paprilus and it is a Seiurus is true if it does not slay Squatina. fact16: That heading is a Perdicidae. ; $hypothesis$ = That heading is a Seiurus and it cavorts Paprilus. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That glutealness does not happens.

¬{A}

fact1: This rucking coiling happens. fact2: That puritanicalness occurs. fact3: That glutealness occurs. fact4: The fact that the mercuricness occurs hold. fact5: This multilevelness happens. fact6: The unableness happens. fact7: That that exalting Mammutidae does not happens causes that both this unappealingness and that glutealness happens. fact8: This Nipponeseness happens. fact9: This breeziness happens. fact10: That exalting Mammutidae does not occurs if that sinecure occurs. fact11: The isolation occurs. fact12: The absolving courageousness happens. fact13: That submersion happens. fact14: The intestateness happens. fact15: The fact that that unlimitedness occurs hold. fact16: This clasping nonsensicality occurs. fact17: This throwback occurs. fact18: This unappealingness happens and/or that exalting Mammutidae happens if that sinecure does not happens. fact19: The sugariness happens.

fact1: {DE} fact2: {GC} fact3: {A} fact4: {L} fact5: {H} fact6: {CS} fact7: ¬{C} -> ({B} & {A}) fact8: {HR} fact9: {CT} fact10: {D} -> ¬{C} fact11: {DC} fact12: {HL} fact13: {CM} fact14: {AT} fact15: {EN} fact16: {IL} fact17: {HQ} fact18: ¬{D} -> ({B} v {C}) fact19: {CR}

That glutealness does not happens.

¬{A}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This rucking coiling happens. fact2: That puritanicalness occurs. fact3: That glutealness occurs. fact4: The fact that the mercuricness occurs hold. fact5: This multilevelness happens. fact6: The unableness happens. fact7: That that exalting Mammutidae does not happens causes that both this unappealingness and that glutealness happens. fact8: This Nipponeseness happens. fact9: This breeziness happens. fact10: That exalting Mammutidae does not occurs if that sinecure occurs. fact11: The isolation occurs. fact12: The absolving courageousness happens. fact13: That submersion happens. fact14: The intestateness happens. fact15: The fact that that unlimitedness occurs hold. fact16: This clasping nonsensicality occurs. fact17: This throwback occurs. fact18: This unappealingness happens and/or that exalting Mammutidae happens if that sinecure does not happens. fact19: The sugariness happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That glutealness does not happens. ; $proof$ =

fact3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

Notthat nonradioactiveness but this debasing misquotation occurs.

(¬{AA} & {AB})

fact1: That that hypertrophiedness occurs triggers that notthe ametropicness but that Nigerien happens. fact2: If that comprising asset does not occurs then this overlooking slackness and that non-plumbousness happens. fact3: If the ametropicness does not occurs and that Nigerien occurs the parking Pygopus does not happens. fact4: The vaporing does not happens and that documentariness happens if the hogging practicability occurs. fact5: That thermal does not happens if the fact that notthe cotilion but the ultrasonography happens is wrong. fact6: Both this clewing protoarcheology and that hypertrophiedness happens if that thermal does not occurs. fact7: That that binauralness happens is prevented by that either that Dominican or the officiating nonchalance or both occurs. fact8: That binauralness happens. fact9: That the parking Pygopus does not happens triggers that that Dominican and that bombardment occurs. fact10: That that binauralness happens prevents that this debasing misquotation does not occurs. fact11: If that this guttural does not occurs but this glowing happens does not hold this glowing does not happens. fact12: If that binauralness does not happens then that that nonradioactiveness does not happens and this debasing misquotation occurs is wrong. fact13: This debasing misquotation happens. fact14: If this glowing does not occurs then that that taunting occurs or that pigsticking occurs or both is wrong. fact15: If this plumbousness does not occurs then that that notthe cotilion but the ultrasonography occurs does not hold is not false. fact16: The fact that the fact that this guttural does not occurs but this glowing happens is not right if that unglazedness does not happens hold. fact17: That comprising asset does not occurs if that that taunting or that pigsticking or both happens is false.

fact1: {H} -> (¬{F} & {G}) fact2: ¬{O} -> ({N} & ¬{M}) fact3: (¬{F} & {G}) -> ¬{E} fact4: {HG} -> (¬{FN} & {BA}) fact5: ¬(¬{L} & {K}) -> ¬{J} fact6: ¬{J} -> ({I} & {H}) fact7: ({C} v {B}) -> ¬{A} fact8: {A} fact9: ¬{E} -> ({C} & {D}) fact10: {A} -> {AB} fact11: ¬(¬{T} & {R}) -> ¬{R} fact12: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) fact13: {AB} fact14: ¬{R} -> ¬({Q} v {P}) fact15: ¬{M} -> ¬(¬{L} & {K}) fact16: ¬{S} -> ¬(¬{T} & {R}) fact17: ¬({Q} v {P}) -> ¬{O}

That notthat nonradioactiveness but this debasing misquotation happens is incorrect.

¬(¬{AA} & {AB})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That that hypertrophiedness occurs triggers that notthe ametropicness but that Nigerien happens. fact2: If that comprising asset does not occurs then this overlooking slackness and that non-plumbousness happens. fact3: If the ametropicness does not occurs and that Nigerien occurs the parking Pygopus does not happens. fact4: The vaporing does not happens and that documentariness happens if the hogging practicability occurs. fact5: That thermal does not happens if the fact that notthe cotilion but the ultrasonography happens is wrong. fact6: Both this clewing protoarcheology and that hypertrophiedness happens if that thermal does not occurs. fact7: That that binauralness happens is prevented by that either that Dominican or the officiating nonchalance or both occurs. fact8: That binauralness happens. fact9: That the parking Pygopus does not happens triggers that that Dominican and that bombardment occurs. fact10: That that binauralness happens prevents that this debasing misquotation does not occurs. fact11: If that this guttural does not occurs but this glowing happens does not hold this glowing does not happens. fact12: If that binauralness does not happens then that that nonradioactiveness does not happens and this debasing misquotation occurs is wrong. fact13: This debasing misquotation happens. fact14: If this glowing does not occurs then that that taunting occurs or that pigsticking occurs or both is wrong. fact15: If this plumbousness does not occurs then that that notthe cotilion but the ultrasonography occurs does not hold is not false. fact16: The fact that the fact that this guttural does not occurs but this glowing happens is not right if that unglazedness does not happens hold. fact17: That comprising asset does not occurs if that that taunting or that pigsticking or both happens is false. ; $hypothesis$ = Notthat nonradioactiveness but this debasing misquotation occurs. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That this sanfoin coincides and links Joffrey is wrong.

¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa})

fact1: That something coincides and does link Joffrey is true if that thing does not dabble twentieth. fact2: If some person is a banns then that it is a surname and does not dabble twentieth does not hold. fact3: Something does not coincide if the fact that it is a surname that does not dabble twentieth does not hold. fact4: Someone is a kind of an italic if she/he is Arthurian. fact5: If the fact that something is a Polyprion but it does not mean is incorrect it is not a neuroepithelioma. fact6: If that abbacy does not dabble twentieth then that this sanfoin coincides and links Joffrey does not hold. fact7: This sanfoin is a kind of a Fonda and the person is a Stevenson. fact8: This parsley is a kind of non-Arthurian thing that loots approbation if this congress is not a neuroepithelioma. fact9: the twentieth does not dabble sanfoin. fact10: This sanfoin does not dabble twentieth. fact11: If something is an italic then it is a kind of a banns and/or it is not a surname. fact12: If this threonine irritates spinnbarkeit then that this congress is a Polyprion and does not mean is not correct. fact13: Jon is a kind of a McCullers and it is not unexpansive if Jon does not link Joffrey. fact14: Something coincides if the fact that that does not dabble twentieth is correct. fact15: That abbacy is not non-Arthurian if this parsley is a kind of non-Arthurian thing that loots approbation. fact16: Something does not dabble twentieth if either it is a banns or it is not a surname or both. fact17: Someone that is not a oersted churns perplexity and modernizes Valkyrie. fact18: This sanfoin is both tearful and unspecified. fact19: If this sanfoin does not coincide this sanfoin is a Triglidae and it shuns Scirpus. fact20: This sanfoin is a Araneida and it is a broiled. fact21: This sanfoin coincides if this sanfoin does not dabble twentieth.

fact1: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({AA}x & {AB}x) fact2: (x): {C}x -> ¬({B}x & ¬{A}x) fact3: (x): ¬({B}x & ¬{A}x) -> ¬{AA}x fact4: (x): {E}x -> {D}x fact5: (x): ¬({H}x & ¬{I}x) -> ¬{G}x fact6: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) fact7: ({GU}{aa} & {ID}{aa}) fact8: ¬{G}{c} -> (¬{E}{b} & {F}{b}) fact9: ¬{AC}{ab} fact10: ¬{A}{aa} fact11: (x): {D}x -> ({C}x v ¬{B}x) fact12: {J}{d} -> ¬({H}{c} & ¬{I}{c}) fact13: ¬{AB}{er} -> ({EE}{er} & {AM}{er}) fact14: (x): ¬{A}x -> {AA}x fact15: (¬{E}{b} & {F}{b}) -> {E}{a} fact16: (x): ({C}x v ¬{B}x) -> ¬{A}x fact17: (x): ¬{HN}x -> ({DA}x & {AK}x) fact18: ({FR}{aa} & {HG}{aa}) fact19: ¬{AA}{aa} -> ({GS}{aa} & {AQ}{aa}) fact20: ({EG}{aa} & {BR}{aa}) fact21: ¬{A}{aa} -> {AA}{aa}

That turacou does not coincide.

¬{AA}{fr}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That something coincides and does link Joffrey is true if that thing does not dabble twentieth. fact2: If some person is a banns then that it is a surname and does not dabble twentieth does not hold. fact3: Something does not coincide if the fact that it is a surname that does not dabble twentieth does not hold. fact4: Someone is a kind of an italic if she/he is Arthurian. fact5: If the fact that something is a Polyprion but it does not mean is incorrect it is not a neuroepithelioma. fact6: If that abbacy does not dabble twentieth then that this sanfoin coincides and links Joffrey does not hold. fact7: This sanfoin is a kind of a Fonda and the person is a Stevenson. fact8: This parsley is a kind of non-Arthurian thing that loots approbation if this congress is not a neuroepithelioma. fact9: the twentieth does not dabble sanfoin. fact10: This sanfoin does not dabble twentieth. fact11: If something is an italic then it is a kind of a banns and/or it is not a surname. fact12: If this threonine irritates spinnbarkeit then that this congress is a Polyprion and does not mean is not correct. fact13: Jon is a kind of a McCullers and it is not unexpansive if Jon does not link Joffrey. fact14: Something coincides if the fact that that does not dabble twentieth is correct. fact15: That abbacy is not non-Arthurian if this parsley is a kind of non-Arthurian thing that loots approbation. fact16: Something does not dabble twentieth if either it is a banns or it is not a surname or both. fact17: Someone that is not a oersted churns perplexity and modernizes Valkyrie. fact18: This sanfoin is both tearful and unspecified. fact19: If this sanfoin does not coincide this sanfoin is a Triglidae and it shuns Scirpus. fact20: This sanfoin is a Araneida and it is a broiled. fact21: This sanfoin coincides if this sanfoin does not dabble twentieth. ; $hypothesis$ = That this sanfoin coincides and links Joffrey is wrong. ; $proof$ =

fact1 -> int1: This sanfoin does coincide and the thing links Joffrey if this sanfoin does not dabble twentieth.; int1 & fact10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This tumefaction is not generous.

¬{C}{c}

fact1: If the fact that something is nonfatal and the thing is nonprehensile is incorrect the thing is not nonfatal. fact2: If that this tumefaction quickens hold then it expiates. fact3: That deposit is not disadvantageous if that Darla does expiate and does not quicken does not hold. fact4: If the thiamin is not nonsectarian that this doorman is nonfatal and the thing is nonprehensile is not right. fact5: If that outdoors is not endoergic the fact that this wig is both not generous and not unlikeable is false. fact6: If that outdoors is unlikeable this tumefaction is generous. fact7: If this wig is endoergic that outdoors is unlikeable. fact8: If something is not a Urocystis then that that expiates and that does not quicken does not hold. fact9: Something is not generous and this is not disadvantageous if this expiates. fact10: This clianthus is generous. fact11: If the fact that this wig is non-generous and she/he is not unlikeable does not hold this tumefaction is not non-generous. fact12: If this doorman is not nonfatal Darla is not a Urocystis.

fact1: (x): ¬({H}x & {J}x) -> ¬{H}x fact2: {F}{c} -> {E}{c} fact3: ¬({E}{e} & ¬{F}{e}) -> ¬{D}{d} fact4: ¬{I}{g} -> ¬({H}{f} & {J}{f}) fact5: ¬{A}{b} -> ¬(¬{C}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) fact6: {B}{b} -> {C}{c} fact7: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} fact8: (x): ¬{G}x -> ¬({E}x & ¬{F}x) fact9: (x): {E}x -> (¬{C}x & ¬{D}x) fact10: {C}{ao} fact11: ¬(¬{C}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> ¬{C}{c} fact12: ¬{H}{f} -> ¬{G}{e}

This tumefaction is not generous.

¬{C}{c}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If the fact that something is nonfatal and the thing is nonprehensile is incorrect the thing is not nonfatal. fact2: If that this tumefaction quickens hold then it expiates. fact3: That deposit is not disadvantageous if that Darla does expiate and does not quicken does not hold. fact4: If the thiamin is not nonsectarian that this doorman is nonfatal and the thing is nonprehensile is not right. fact5: If that outdoors is not endoergic the fact that this wig is both not generous and not unlikeable is false. fact6: If that outdoors is unlikeable this tumefaction is generous. fact7: If this wig is endoergic that outdoors is unlikeable. fact8: If something is not a Urocystis then that that expiates and that does not quicken does not hold. fact9: Something is not generous and this is not disadvantageous if this expiates. fact10: This clianthus is generous. fact11: If the fact that this wig is non-generous and she/he is not unlikeable does not hold this tumefaction is not non-generous. fact12: If this doorman is not nonfatal Darla is not a Urocystis. ; $hypothesis$ = This tumefaction is not generous. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That this halma occurs is true.

{B}

fact1: If this leaking demisemiquaver occurs then that that acquitting Moniliaceae does not occurs and that artifactualness does not occurs does not hold. fact2: If the fact that this thermoelectricalness but notthe spurning candlepower happens does not hold this thermoelectricalness does not occurs. fact3: That notthis machinating Archilochus but this serving occurs causes that that canvassing does not happens. fact4: If this immutableness happens the fact that this Calvary happens and this break does not happens does not hold. fact5: The fact that this reformulating trad does not happens and the effectuation does not occurs is not right. fact6: The fact that this dimorphicness does not happens and this communistness occurs is false. fact7: That this thermoelectricalness but notthe spurning candlepower happens is false if that contracture does not occurs. fact8: If this thermoelectricalness does not occurs then the fact that both the cardiographicness and this heave occurs does not hold. fact9: That this communistness and this prophylaxis occurs is false if this dimorphicness does not occurs. fact10: If the fact that that canvassing does not happens hold then the fact that both this asphyxiating Frimaire and this picture occurs is not right. fact11: That this chequering does not happens results in that this leaking demisemiquaver and this halma happens. fact12: This chequering does not occurs if that both this asphyxiating Frimaire and this picture happens does not hold. fact13: That this dimorphicness and that non-communistness happens is incorrect. fact14: The quibbling resoluteness occurs and this immutableness happens if this prophylaxis does not occurs. fact15: That linking IAEA does not occurs if the nauseating Bloch happens and/or this Calvary does not occurs. fact16: This heave does not happens if the fact that the cardiographicness happens and this heave occurs is not correct. fact17: If the fact that this dimorphicness does not happens and this communistness does not happens is incorrect then this halma occurs. fact18: That both that non-dimorphicness and that non-communistness occurs is wrong. fact19: The fact that if the fact that the sickening Phalaris does not occurs and/or the protecting Euphorbiaceae occurs is false then this dimorphicness does not happens is right. fact20: This machinating Archilochus does not happens and this serving occurs if this heave does not occurs. fact21: This Calvary does not happens if the fact that the fact that this Calvary happens but this break does not happens does not hold is correct. fact22: That that linking IAEA does not occurs leads to that that countering occurs but that contracture does not happens.

fact1: {A} -> ¬(¬{GL} & ¬{IB}) fact2: ¬({K} & ¬{M}) -> ¬{K} fact3: (¬{G} & {H}) -> ¬{F} fact4: {R} -> ¬({P} & ¬{S}) fact5: ¬(¬{BQ} & ¬{BD}) fact6: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) fact7: ¬{L} -> ¬({K} & ¬{M}) fact8: ¬{K} -> ¬({J} & {I}) fact9: ¬{AA} -> ¬({AB} & {U}) fact10: ¬{F} -> ¬({D} & {E}) fact11: ¬{C} -> ({A} & {B}) fact12: ¬({D} & {E}) -> ¬{C} fact13: ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) fact14: ¬{U} -> ({T} & {R}) fact15: ({Q} v ¬{P}) -> ¬{O} fact16: ¬({J} & {I}) -> ¬{I} fact17: ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) -> {B} fact18: ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) fact19: ¬(¬{AC} v {AD}) -> ¬{AA} fact20: ¬{I} -> (¬{G} & {H}) fact21: ¬({P} & ¬{S}) -> ¬{P} fact22: ¬{O} -> ({N} & ¬{L})

The fact that that acquitting Moniliaceae does not happens and that artifactualness does not occurs does not hold.

¬(¬{GL} & ¬{IB})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this leaking demisemiquaver occurs then that that acquitting Moniliaceae does not occurs and that artifactualness does not occurs does not hold. fact2: If the fact that this thermoelectricalness but notthe spurning candlepower happens does not hold this thermoelectricalness does not occurs. fact3: That notthis machinating Archilochus but this serving occurs causes that that canvassing does not happens. fact4: If this immutableness happens the fact that this Calvary happens and this break does not happens does not hold. fact5: The fact that this reformulating trad does not happens and the effectuation does not occurs is not right. fact6: The fact that this dimorphicness does not happens and this communistness occurs is false. fact7: That this thermoelectricalness but notthe spurning candlepower happens is false if that contracture does not occurs. fact8: If this thermoelectricalness does not occurs then the fact that both the cardiographicness and this heave occurs does not hold. fact9: That this communistness and this prophylaxis occurs is false if this dimorphicness does not occurs. fact10: If the fact that that canvassing does not happens hold then the fact that both this asphyxiating Frimaire and this picture occurs is not right. fact11: That this chequering does not happens results in that this leaking demisemiquaver and this halma happens. fact12: This chequering does not occurs if that both this asphyxiating Frimaire and this picture happens does not hold. fact13: That this dimorphicness and that non-communistness happens is incorrect. fact14: The quibbling resoluteness occurs and this immutableness happens if this prophylaxis does not occurs. fact15: That linking IAEA does not occurs if the nauseating Bloch happens and/or this Calvary does not occurs. fact16: This heave does not happens if the fact that the cardiographicness happens and this heave occurs is not correct. fact17: If the fact that this dimorphicness does not happens and this communistness does not happens is incorrect then this halma occurs. fact18: That both that non-dimorphicness and that non-communistness occurs is wrong. fact19: The fact that if the fact that the sickening Phalaris does not occurs and/or the protecting Euphorbiaceae occurs is false then this dimorphicness does not happens is right. fact20: This machinating Archilochus does not happens and this serving occurs if this heave does not occurs. fact21: This Calvary does not happens if the fact that the fact that this Calvary happens but this break does not happens does not hold is correct. fact22: That that linking IAEA does not occurs leads to that that countering occurs but that contracture does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That this halma occurs is true. ; $proof$ =

fact17 & fact18 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That humanizing does not happens.

¬{C}

fact1: This handling Pauli does not happens. fact2: If this incompleteness does not occurs then both that humanizing and that abstracting inhumaneness occurs. fact3: The unlacing Dermoptera occurs. fact4: That that lapidation does not occurs yields that both this emancipation and this enduring tiresomeness occurs. fact5: This romance does not happens if both this carrot and the commencing atonicity happens. fact6: If that bibliothecalness does not occurs then the fact that that that lapidation occurs and the crushed does not occurs is not right is not incorrect. fact7: The aiming happens. fact8: That this incompleteness does not happens is triggered by that this enduring tiresomeness occurs and/or this non-incompleteness. fact9: That abstracting inhumaneness occurs. fact10: The dynamicness does not occurs. fact11: This incompleteness happens. fact12: That lapidation does not happens if the fact that that lapidation occurs and the crushed does not occurs is incorrect. fact13: That that abstracting inhumaneness occurs and this incompleteness happens prevents that humanizing.

fact1: ¬{CT} fact2: ¬{B} -> ({C} & {A}) fact3: {HD} fact4: ¬{F} -> ({D} & {E}) fact5: ({FO} & {JI}) -> ¬{JB} fact6: ¬{H} -> ¬({F} & ¬{G}) fact7: {IK} fact8: ({E} v ¬{B}) -> ¬{B} fact9: {A} fact10: ¬{CB} fact11: {B} fact12: ¬({F} & ¬{G}) -> ¬{F} fact13: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C}

That humanizing occurs.

{C}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This handling Pauli does not happens. fact2: If this incompleteness does not occurs then both that humanizing and that abstracting inhumaneness occurs. fact3: The unlacing Dermoptera occurs. fact4: That that lapidation does not occurs yields that both this emancipation and this enduring tiresomeness occurs. fact5: This romance does not happens if both this carrot and the commencing atonicity happens. fact6: If that bibliothecalness does not occurs then the fact that that that lapidation occurs and the crushed does not occurs is not right is not incorrect. fact7: The aiming happens. fact8: That this incompleteness does not happens is triggered by that this enduring tiresomeness occurs and/or this non-incompleteness. fact9: That abstracting inhumaneness occurs. fact10: The dynamicness does not occurs. fact11: This incompleteness happens. fact12: That lapidation does not happens if the fact that that lapidation occurs and the crushed does not occurs is incorrect. fact13: That that abstracting inhumaneness occurs and this incompleteness happens prevents that humanizing. ; $hypothesis$ = That humanizing does not happens. ; $proof$ =

fact9 & fact11 -> int1: That abstracting inhumaneness and this incompleteness occurs.; int1 & fact13 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That chronometer exacts.

{B}{b}

fact1: This allograft is not metrological but that person does exact if Kike tempts comprehensibility. fact2: That chronometer does not exact if this allograft is not metrological but it exact. fact3: If some man that is not a kind of a indetermination is blastemal the fact that she tempts comprehensibility is right. fact4: If that STH is violable Kike is not a indetermination and is not non-blastemal. fact5: This allograft is not metrological. fact6: This heartwood is a crash. fact7: If that something is a kind of a Conyza that does not fork disfunction is false this thing is not a Conyza. fact8: If this allograft is not metrological that this allograft is a crash and hypophysectomises presumptuousness is right. fact9: If someone is a multiplicity then it is violable. fact10: Somebody is a multiplicity and citifieds if it is not a Conyza. fact11: This allograft is a crash. fact12: The fact that this allograft is a crash hold if it is not metrological.

fact1: {C}{c} -> (¬{A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact2: (¬{A}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact3: (x): (¬{E}x & {D}x) -> {C}x fact4: {F}{d} -> (¬{E}{c} & {D}{c}) fact5: ¬{A}{a} fact6: {AA}{dk} fact7: (x): ¬({I}x & ¬{J}x) -> ¬{I}x fact8: ¬{A}{a} -> ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact9: (x): {G}x -> {F}x fact10: (x): ¬{I}x -> ({G}x & {H}x) fact11: {AA}{a} fact12: ¬{A}{a} -> {AA}{a}

That chronometer does not exact.

¬{B}{b}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This allograft is not metrological but that person does exact if Kike tempts comprehensibility. fact2: That chronometer does not exact if this allograft is not metrological but it exact. fact3: If some man that is not a kind of a indetermination is blastemal the fact that she tempts comprehensibility is right. fact4: If that STH is violable Kike is not a indetermination and is not non-blastemal. fact5: This allograft is not metrological. fact6: This heartwood is a crash. fact7: If that something is a kind of a Conyza that does not fork disfunction is false this thing is not a Conyza. fact8: If this allograft is not metrological that this allograft is a crash and hypophysectomises presumptuousness is right. fact9: If someone is a multiplicity then it is violable. fact10: Somebody is a multiplicity and citifieds if it is not a Conyza. fact11: This allograft is a crash. fact12: The fact that this allograft is a crash hold if it is not metrological. ; $hypothesis$ = That chronometer exacts. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That notthe allying infix but that ladder occurs hold.

(¬{AA} & {AB})

fact1: That notthe allying infix but that ladder occurs is brought about by that that aggravation happens. fact2: If the fact that that evangelicalness does not happens but the clouding occurs is incorrect then that that lupineness does not happens is right. fact3: The fact that that evangelicalness does not happens and the clouding happens is false if the fact that that hemolyticness occurs is true. fact4: If that lupineness does not happens that aggravation does not occurs but this eyelessness happens. fact5: That aggravation happens. fact6: That that isolationisticness does not occurs brings about that that hemolyticness occurs and the revue occurs. fact7: That isolationisticness does not happens and that scandalization does not occurs if that multilateralness does not happens. fact8: If that aggravation does not happens the fact that the allying infix does not occurs and that ladder happens is incorrect. fact9: The allying infix does not happens.

fact1: {A} -> (¬{AA} & {AB}) fact2: ¬(¬{E} & {D}) -> ¬{C} fact3: {F} -> ¬(¬{E} & {D}) fact4: ¬{C} -> (¬{A} & {B}) fact5: {A} fact6: ¬{H} -> ({F} & {G}) fact7: ¬{J} -> (¬{H} & ¬{I}) fact8: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) fact9: ¬{AA}

The fact that notthe allying infix but that ladder occurs is wrong.

¬(¬{AA} & {AB})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That notthe allying infix but that ladder occurs is brought about by that that aggravation happens. fact2: If the fact that that evangelicalness does not happens but the clouding occurs is incorrect then that that lupineness does not happens is right. fact3: The fact that that evangelicalness does not happens and the clouding happens is false if the fact that that hemolyticness occurs is true. fact4: If that lupineness does not happens that aggravation does not occurs but this eyelessness happens. fact5: That aggravation happens. fact6: That that isolationisticness does not occurs brings about that that hemolyticness occurs and the revue occurs. fact7: That isolationisticness does not happens and that scandalization does not occurs if that multilateralness does not happens. fact8: If that aggravation does not happens the fact that the allying infix does not occurs and that ladder happens is incorrect. fact9: The allying infix does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That notthe allying infix but that ladder occurs hold. ; $proof$ =

fact1 & fact5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

Let's assume that the fact that that unlikeableness happens but this lineman does not occurs is false.

¬({AA} & ¬{AB})

fact1: Both that rating and this jumping occurs. fact2: The fact that that unlikeableness happens but this lineman does not happens is false if that rating does not occurs. fact3: That unlikeableness happens. fact4: If the fact that that unlikeableness occurs but this lineman does not happens is incorrect this jumping does not happens. fact5: If that unlikeableness does not happens then that this jumping does not occurs is right.

fact1: ({A} & {B}) fact2: ¬{A} -> ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) fact3: {AA} fact4: ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) -> ¬{B} fact5: ¬{AA} -> ¬{B}

Let's assume that the fact that that unlikeableness happens but this lineman does not occurs is false.

¬({AA} & ¬{AB})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Both that rating and this jumping occurs. fact2: The fact that that unlikeableness happens but this lineman does not happens is false if that rating does not occurs. fact3: That unlikeableness happens. fact4: If the fact that that unlikeableness occurs but this lineman does not happens is incorrect this jumping does not happens. fact5: If that unlikeableness does not happens then that this jumping does not occurs is right. ; $hypothesis$ = Let's assume that the fact that that unlikeableness happens but this lineman does not occurs is false. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that that unlikeableness happens but this lineman does not occurs is false.; fact4 & assump1 -> int1: This jumping does not happens.; fact1 -> int2: This jumping occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

Sai is not anthropometrical.

¬{B}{b}

fact1: Sai is not a Tokyo and neatens Tilden if the fact that that tessera is a basophilia is true. fact2: Something is not anthropometrical if the fact that the fact that this thing is not a kind of a basophilia and is not syntactic is correct does not hold. fact3: If that plunger is not a Salvadora then that tessera yells Hasdrubal and is a Corynebacteriaceae. fact4: The fact that Sai does not neaten Tilden is true if that tessera is anthropometrical. fact5: If that tessera is a Tokyo then Sai is not a basophilia but it is anthropometrical. fact6: That tessera is a kind of a basophilia. fact7: If that tessera is anthropometrical and is a basophilia that is a Tokyo. fact8: That tessera is a antiphonal if that tessera is not a basophilia but it is ceilinged. fact9: Sai is not non-endogenous. fact10: Sai is a scrappiness. fact11: If something that is not a basophilia is anthropometrical then this thing does neaten Tilden. fact12: If that that tessera is a Tokyo hold then Sai is non-anthropometrical. fact13: That tessera is syntactic if this thing is a kind of a Corynebacteriaceae.

fact1: {A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact2: (x): ¬(¬{A}x & ¬{C}x) -> ¬{B}x fact3: ¬{F}{c} -> ({E}{a} & {D}{a}) fact4: {B}{a} -> ¬{AB}{b} fact5: {AA}{a} -> (¬{A}{b} & {B}{b}) fact6: {A}{a} fact7: ({B}{a} & {A}{a}) -> {AA}{a} fact8: (¬{A}{a} & {DI}{a}) -> {GB}{a} fact9: {AR}{b} fact10: {CH}{b} fact11: (x): (¬{A}x & {B}x) -> {AB}x fact12: {AA}{a} -> ¬{B}{b} fact13: {D}{a} -> {C}{a}

Sai is not anthropometrical.

¬{B}{b}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Sai is not a Tokyo and neatens Tilden if the fact that that tessera is a basophilia is true. fact2: Something is not anthropometrical if the fact that the fact that this thing is not a kind of a basophilia and is not syntactic is correct does not hold. fact3: If that plunger is not a Salvadora then that tessera yells Hasdrubal and is a Corynebacteriaceae. fact4: The fact that Sai does not neaten Tilden is true if that tessera is anthropometrical. fact5: If that tessera is a Tokyo then Sai is not a basophilia but it is anthropometrical. fact6: That tessera is a kind of a basophilia. fact7: If that tessera is anthropometrical and is a basophilia that is a Tokyo. fact8: That tessera is a antiphonal if that tessera is not a basophilia but it is ceilinged. fact9: Sai is not non-endogenous. fact10: Sai is a scrappiness. fact11: If something that is not a basophilia is anthropometrical then this thing does neaten Tilden. fact12: If that that tessera is a Tokyo hold then Sai is non-anthropometrical. fact13: That tessera is syntactic if this thing is a kind of a Corynebacteriaceae. ; $hypothesis$ = Sai is not anthropometrical. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

Quincy is biped.

{A}{a}

fact1: Something educes and/or is dull if that it is not unshuttered is true. fact2: Quincy is a Machiavellianism. fact3: The blister educes. fact4: That portrait is not a semidarkness. fact5: If Quincy educes that Eliana educes is right. fact6: The bannister is not non-biped. fact7: Quincy is not unshuttered if that portrait is a kind of a hyalinization and is not a Muenchen. fact8: If the fact that something is not biped but it does alternate KGB is wrong then it is behaviouristic. fact9: That Quincy verbalizes and he is a kind of a eudemonism is right. fact10: Quincy is tonsorial and does smoke Runyon. fact11: Quincy educes. fact12: If this burgundy is tonsorial then the fact that Eliana is a kind of non-biped thing that does alternate KGB is false. fact13: The companionway is biped. fact14: If Quincy is dull the fact that Eliana educes hold. fact15: That portrait is a hyalinization. fact16: That portrait is not a Muenchen if that portrait is not a semidarkness.

fact1: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({B}x v {C}x) fact2: {S}{a} fact3: {B}{gn} fact4: ¬{L}{b} fact5: {B}{a} -> {B}{gd} fact6: {A}{u} fact7: ({G}{b} & ¬{F}{b}) -> ¬{E}{a} fact8: (x): ¬(¬{A}x & {D}x) -> {GK}x fact9: ({JE}{a} & {AT}{a}) fact10: ({H}{a} & {GF}{a}) fact11: {B}{a} fact12: {H}{c} -> ¬(¬{A}{gd} & {D}{gd}) fact13: {A}{gj} fact14: {C}{a} -> {B}{gd} fact15: {G}{b} fact16: ¬{L}{b} -> ¬{F}{b}

Eliana educes and is behaviouristic.

({B}{gd} & {GK}{gd})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Something educes and/or is dull if that it is not unshuttered is true. fact2: Quincy is a Machiavellianism. fact3: The blister educes. fact4: That portrait is not a semidarkness. fact5: If Quincy educes that Eliana educes is right. fact6: The bannister is not non-biped. fact7: Quincy is not unshuttered if that portrait is a kind of a hyalinization and is not a Muenchen. fact8: If the fact that something is not biped but it does alternate KGB is wrong then it is behaviouristic. fact9: That Quincy verbalizes and he is a kind of a eudemonism is right. fact10: Quincy is tonsorial and does smoke Runyon. fact11: Quincy educes. fact12: If this burgundy is tonsorial then the fact that Eliana is a kind of non-biped thing that does alternate KGB is false. fact13: The companionway is biped. fact14: If Quincy is dull the fact that Eliana educes hold. fact15: That portrait is a hyalinization. fact16: That portrait is not a Muenchen if that portrait is not a semidarkness. ; $hypothesis$ = Quincy is biped. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This diaphragm tires impecuniousness and this one is enterprising.

({C}{a} & {B}{a})

fact1: This diaphragm tires impecuniousness. fact2: Eddy does not parented. fact3: If something fits then the fact that it is a Guggenheim and does not tire impecuniousness does not hold. fact4: That somebody is a Araguaia and it does outline is wrong if it does not parented. fact5: This impairer does tire impecuniousness. fact6: If there exists someone such that that it is a kind of a Araguaia and it outlines does not hold this diaphragm does not outlines. fact7: If that something is a Guggenheim but the thing does not tire impecuniousness is false the thing enlists endurance. fact8: This Manhattan is not a kind of a Gibson. fact9: Esmeralda is not an unconscious if the fact that this Manhattan is not a Gibson is correct. fact10: This diaphragm is a kind of a Guggenheim and it is enterprising. fact11: that impecuniousness tires diaphragm. fact12: Esmeralda is enterprising if this diaphragm does not outline. fact13: The fact that something fits and is a Balinese hold if that thing is not a kind of an unconscious.

fact1: {C}{a} fact2: ¬{J}{b} fact3: (x): {F}x -> ¬({A}x & ¬{C}x) fact4: (x): ¬{J}x -> ¬({E}x & {D}x) fact5: {C}{fr} fact6: (x): ¬({E}x & {D}x) -> ¬{D}{a} fact7: (x): ¬({A}x & ¬{C}x) -> {EJ}x fact8: ¬{I}{c} fact9: ¬{I}{c} -> ¬{H}{hn} fact10: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact11: {AA}{aa} fact12: ¬{D}{a} -> {B}{hn} fact13: (x): ¬{H}x -> ({F}x & {G}x)

Esmeralda enlists endurance and is enterprising.

({EJ}{hn} & {B}{hn})

PROVED

PROVED

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: This diaphragm tires impecuniousness. fact2: Eddy does not parented. fact3: If something fits then the fact that it is a Guggenheim and does not tire impecuniousness does not hold. fact4: That somebody is a Araguaia and it does outline is wrong if it does not parented. fact5: This impairer does tire impecuniousness. fact6: If there exists someone such that that it is a kind of a Araguaia and it outlines does not hold this diaphragm does not outlines. fact7: If that something is a Guggenheim but the thing does not tire impecuniousness is false the thing enlists endurance. fact8: This Manhattan is not a kind of a Gibson. fact9: Esmeralda is not an unconscious if the fact that this Manhattan is not a Gibson is correct. fact10: This diaphragm is a kind of a Guggenheim and it is enterprising. fact11: that impecuniousness tires diaphragm. fact12: Esmeralda is enterprising if this diaphragm does not outline. fact13: The fact that something fits and is a Balinese hold if that thing is not a kind of an unconscious. ; $hypothesis$ = This diaphragm tires impecuniousness and this one is enterprising. ; $proof$ =

fact10 -> int1: That this diaphragm is enterprising is right.; int1 & fact1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This bawler is Cambrian.

{C}{b}

fact1: Something is a perpendicularity if it does not pay Aeonium and does totter. fact2: That wireworm does not clone jackpot. fact3: This bawler is Cambrian if this provenance is a perpendicularity. fact4: That something is Cambrian and it is a Miocene is not true if it is not a kind of a perpendicularity. fact5: If something is not a Istiophoridae then this thing is not a perpendicularity and is a jelly. fact6: The h is not a kind of a riffle if that wireworm tranquillisings Phasmidae and is a riffle. fact7: This provenance is not a perpendicularity if this barbecue is not a perpendicularity and is a jelly. fact8: That wireworm tranquillisings Phasmidae and it perseverates Bydgoszcz if the fact that that wireworm does not clone jackpot hold. fact9: That wireworm is a riffle. fact10: This provenance does not pay Aeonium and does totter if it is not a Miocene. fact11: If the h is not a riffle then that that opepe is a Istiophoridae but it is not a kind of a Bourse does not hold. fact12: This provenance totters if it is not a kind of a Miocene.

fact1: (x): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x fact2: ¬{J}{f} fact3: {B}{a} -> {C}{b} fact4: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬({C}x & {A}x) fact5: (x): ¬{E}x -> (¬{B}x & {D}x) fact6: ({I}{f} & {G}{f}) -> ¬{G}{e} fact7: (¬{B}{c} & {D}{c}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact8: ¬{J}{f} -> ({I}{f} & {H}{f}) fact9: {G}{f} fact10: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact11: ¬{G}{e} -> ¬({E}{d} & ¬{F}{d}) fact12: ¬{A}{a} -> {AB}{a}

This bawler is not Cambrian.

¬{C}{b}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Something is a perpendicularity if it does not pay Aeonium and does totter. fact2: That wireworm does not clone jackpot. fact3: This bawler is Cambrian if this provenance is a perpendicularity. fact4: That something is Cambrian and it is a Miocene is not true if it is not a kind of a perpendicularity. fact5: If something is not a Istiophoridae then this thing is not a perpendicularity and is a jelly. fact6: The h is not a kind of a riffle if that wireworm tranquillisings Phasmidae and is a riffle. fact7: This provenance is not a perpendicularity if this barbecue is not a perpendicularity and is a jelly. fact8: That wireworm tranquillisings Phasmidae and it perseverates Bydgoszcz if the fact that that wireworm does not clone jackpot hold. fact9: That wireworm is a riffle. fact10: This provenance does not pay Aeonium and does totter if it is not a Miocene. fact11: If the h is not a riffle then that that opepe is a Istiophoridae but it is not a kind of a Bourse does not hold. fact12: This provenance totters if it is not a kind of a Miocene. ; $hypothesis$ = This bawler is Cambrian. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This hangout does splurge but that is not pericardial.

({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a})

fact1: If this hangout is not a perennial the fact that that thing splurges and is pericardial is wrong. fact2: If that filaria is oleophobic then this hangout Gangeses 10000. fact3: If this bacillus does not cutinize that this bacillus mortgages Armin but the one does not sever is false. fact4: If that something is a kind of idler thing that is not conjugal does not hold then it is not idler. fact5: If this hangout Gangeses 10000 that tacker is not redemptive or unaddicted or both. fact6: That this hangout is a unsoundness that is armless is false if this hangout is not a perennial. fact7: A non-idler one is not a perennial. fact8: The fact that this hangout splurges and it is not non-pericardial is wrong. fact9: This hangout is not a kind of a perennial. fact10: If that this hangout is not a perennial is correct then the fact that this hangout splurges but the one is not pericardial does not hold. fact11: This bacillus does not cutinize and it is not a kind of a Mendelian. fact12: Some person is oleophobic if that that person mortgages Armin and does not sever is false. fact13: If this bacillus is oleophobic that filaria is not oleophobic. fact14: That something is idler and is not conjugal does not hold if that it is not redemptive is true. fact15: If something is non-redemptive or is unaddicted or both it is not non-redemptive.

fact1: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact2: {G}{b} -> {E}{a} fact3: ¬{J}{c} -> ¬({H}{c} & ¬{I}{c}) fact4: (x): ¬({B}x & ¬{C}x) -> ¬{B}x fact5: {E}{a} -> (¬{D}{eq} v {F}{eq}) fact6: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({CR}{a} & {DQ}{a}) fact7: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬{A}x fact8: ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact9: ¬{A}{a} fact10: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact11: (¬{J}{c} & ¬{K}{c}) fact12: (x): ¬({H}x & ¬{I}x) -> {G}x fact13: {G}{c} -> {G}{b} fact14: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬({B}x & ¬{C}x) fact15: (x): (¬{D}x v {F}x) -> ¬{D}x

That tacker is not a kind of a perennial.

¬{A}{eq}

DISPROVED

PROVED

DISPROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: If this hangout is not a perennial the fact that that thing splurges and is pericardial is wrong. fact2: If that filaria is oleophobic then this hangout Gangeses 10000. fact3: If this bacillus does not cutinize that this bacillus mortgages Armin but the one does not sever is false. fact4: If that something is a kind of idler thing that is not conjugal does not hold then it is not idler. fact5: If this hangout Gangeses 10000 that tacker is not redemptive or unaddicted or both. fact6: That this hangout is a unsoundness that is armless is false if this hangout is not a perennial. fact7: A non-idler one is not a perennial. fact8: The fact that this hangout splurges and it is not non-pericardial is wrong. fact9: This hangout is not a kind of a perennial. fact10: If that this hangout is not a perennial is correct then the fact that this hangout splurges but the one is not pericardial does not hold. fact11: This bacillus does not cutinize and it is not a kind of a Mendelian. fact12: Some person is oleophobic if that that person mortgages Armin and does not sever is false. fact13: If this bacillus is oleophobic that filaria is not oleophobic. fact14: That something is idler and is not conjugal does not hold if that it is not redemptive is true. fact15: If something is non-redemptive or is unaddicted or both it is not non-redemptive. ; $hypothesis$ = This hangout does splurge but that is not pericardial. ; $proof$ =

fact10 & fact9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That this Saturnalia and that putsch happens does not hold.

¬({C} & {B})

fact1: This sheering occurs if the staging does not occurs. fact2: If that geysering mongolianism does not occurs that Dominicanness and this reordering pizzazz occurs. fact3: That that geysering mongolianism does not occurs is brought about by that this eating but notthis strengthening macumba happens. fact4: That this fatlessness occurs hold. fact5: If this granulating occurs then this eating happens and this strengthening macumba does not happens. fact6: If this lick does not occurs then the fact that this subocularness does not occurs and that garland occurs is wrong. fact7: That geysering mongolianism happens. fact8: That this astonishing Menotti occurs and this Saturnalia occurs is triggered by that this eating does not occurs. fact9: The fact that this Saturnalia occurs and that putsch occurs is wrong if this randomisation does not occurs. fact10: If this fatlessness does not occurs that putsch does not happens. fact11: If this randomisation occurs then that putsch happens. fact12: That orgy does not happens if that this subocularness does not happens but that garland occurs is false. fact13: That this sheering occurs but this Mendelianness does not occurs prevents this lick. fact14: This Saturnalia and this fatlessness happens. fact15: If that orgy does not occurs this granulating and the homosporousness happens. fact16: That this randomisation does not occurs and this fatlessness does not occurs is brought about by that that Dominicanness occurs. fact17: This fatlessness does not happens if this reordering pizzazz does not occurs and that Dominicanness does not happens.

fact1: ¬{R} -> {P} fact2: ¬{G} -> ({E} & {F}) fact3: ({H} & ¬{I}) -> ¬{G} fact4: {D} fact5: {J} -> ({H} & ¬{I}) fact6: ¬{O} -> ¬(¬{N} & {M}) fact7: {G} fact8: ¬{H} -> ({FF} & {C}) fact9: ¬{A} -> ¬({C} & {B}) fact10: ¬{D} -> ¬{B} fact11: {A} -> {B} fact12: ¬(¬{N} & {M}) -> ¬{L} fact13: ({P} & ¬{Q}) -> ¬{O} fact14: ({C} & {D}) fact15: ¬{L} -> ({J} & {K}) fact16: {E} -> (¬{A} & ¬{D}) fact17: (¬{F} & ¬{E}) -> ¬{D}

Both this imperiling Marseillaise and this astonishing Menotti happens.

({CM} & {FF})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This sheering occurs if the staging does not occurs. fact2: If that geysering mongolianism does not occurs that Dominicanness and this reordering pizzazz occurs. fact3: That that geysering mongolianism does not occurs is brought about by that this eating but notthis strengthening macumba happens. fact4: That this fatlessness occurs hold. fact5: If this granulating occurs then this eating happens and this strengthening macumba does not happens. fact6: If this lick does not occurs then the fact that this subocularness does not occurs and that garland occurs is wrong. fact7: That geysering mongolianism happens. fact8: That this astonishing Menotti occurs and this Saturnalia occurs is triggered by that this eating does not occurs. fact9: The fact that this Saturnalia occurs and that putsch occurs is wrong if this randomisation does not occurs. fact10: If this fatlessness does not occurs that putsch does not happens. fact11: If this randomisation occurs then that putsch happens. fact12: That orgy does not happens if that this subocularness does not happens but that garland occurs is false. fact13: That this sheering occurs but this Mendelianness does not occurs prevents this lick. fact14: This Saturnalia and this fatlessness happens. fact15: If that orgy does not occurs this granulating and the homosporousness happens. fact16: That this randomisation does not occurs and this fatlessness does not occurs is brought about by that that Dominicanness occurs. fact17: This fatlessness does not happens if this reordering pizzazz does not occurs and that Dominicanness does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That this Saturnalia and that putsch happens does not hold. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This zebra does Best.

{B}{b}

fact1: That porc is semitropical and it is a Slezsko. fact2: That porc is a kind of a Slezsko. fact3: That porc is antitypic if it is not non-cauline. fact4: If that that cisterna does uprise inclined and he reexamines Bromeliaceae is incorrect then this zebra does not Best. fact5: A benthic man does not featherbed and do notom. fact6: Something is semitropical and benthic if the thing is not cauline. fact7: If that cisterna does not uprise inclined this zebra does not Best. fact8: If that somebody featherbeds but it is not benthic is false then it do notom. fact9: That cisterna do notom. fact10: If that porc is not dramaturgical then that porc is antitypic. fact11: That the fact that this zebra featherbeds but it is not benthic is false hold if this zebra is not semitropical. fact12: That porc is not dramaturgical. fact13: If that cisterna Bests the fact that this zebra does Bests hold. fact14: If that cisterna do notom the fact that that cisterna uprises inclined and reexamines Bromeliaceae does not hold. fact15: Something Bests if that thing does not featherbed and that thing do notom. fact16: That porc is not cauline if that porc is a Slezsko.

fact1: ({E}{c} & {H}{c}) fact2: {H}{c} fact3: {F}{c} -> {G}{c} fact4: ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact5: (x): {D}x -> (¬{C}x & ¬{A}x) fact6: (x): ¬{F}x -> ({E}x & {D}x) fact7: ¬{AA}{a} -> ¬{B}{b} fact8: (x): ¬({C}x & ¬{D}x) -> ¬{A}x fact9: ¬{A}{a} fact10: ¬{I}{c} -> {G}{c} fact11: ¬{E}{b} -> ¬({C}{b} & ¬{D}{b}) fact12: ¬{I}{c} fact13: {B}{a} -> {B}{b} fact14: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact15: (x): (¬{C}x & ¬{A}x) -> {B}x fact16: {H}{c} -> ¬{F}{c}

This zebra does Best.

{B}{b}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That porc is semitropical and it is a Slezsko. fact2: That porc is a kind of a Slezsko. fact3: That porc is antitypic if it is not non-cauline. fact4: If that that cisterna does uprise inclined and he reexamines Bromeliaceae is incorrect then this zebra does not Best. fact5: A benthic man does not featherbed and do notom. fact6: Something is semitropical and benthic if the thing is not cauline. fact7: If that cisterna does not uprise inclined this zebra does not Best. fact8: If that somebody featherbeds but it is not benthic is false then it do notom. fact9: That cisterna do notom. fact10: If that porc is not dramaturgical then that porc is antitypic. fact11: That the fact that this zebra featherbeds but it is not benthic is false hold if this zebra is not semitropical. fact12: That porc is not dramaturgical. fact13: If that cisterna Bests the fact that this zebra does Bests hold. fact14: If that cisterna do notom the fact that that cisterna uprises inclined and reexamines Bromeliaceae does not hold. fact15: Something Bests if that thing does not featherbed and that thing do notom. fact16: That porc is not cauline if that porc is a Slezsko. ; $hypothesis$ = This zebra does Best. ; $proof$ =

fact14 & fact9 -> int1: That that cisterna does uprise inclined and it reexamines Bromeliaceae is not right.; int1 & fact4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This appetizer does not hinder Cordylus.

¬{B}{b}

fact1: If that company is a banded and does not boggle Plectomycetes this appetizer hinders Cordylus. fact2: That company is a kind of a banded but he does not boggle Plectomycetes.

fact1: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} fact2: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a})

DISPROVED

DISPROVED

$facts$ = fact1: If that company is a banded and does not boggle Plectomycetes this appetizer hinders Cordylus. fact2: That company is a kind of a banded but he does not boggle Plectomycetes. ; $hypothesis$ = This appetizer does not hinder Cordylus. ; $proof$ =

fact1 & fact2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This backpack is not a kind of a holonymy.

¬{C}{b}

fact1: Fausto diffuses effectuality and radios. fact2: The fact that that paleocerebellum is a Sundacarpus but it is not a Cordaitaceae is wrong if Fausto does not edge spiked. fact3: If something is a kind of a names it is a holonymy. fact4: The fact that this backpack is not a kind of a holonymy is not wrong if Fausto is a names and a Sundacarpus. fact5: This backpack is not a names if Fausto is a kind of a Sundacarpus and she/he is a holonymy. fact6: Someone does not edge spiked if that it does not glamourise encephalopathy and is not a kind of a Wollstonecraft does not hold. fact7: Fausto is unpolished and overplays deftness. fact8: Something is not a names if that this is a names and a holonymy is incorrect. fact9: This asker is a Sundacarpus. fact10: Something is not a kind of a Sundacarpus if that this thing is a Sundacarpus and this thing is not a kind of a Cordaitaceae does not hold. fact11: The mapper is narrow thing that is a names. fact12: If something is not a Cordaitaceae then it is a Sundacarpus and it edges spiked. fact13: The fact that Fausto does not glamourise encephalopathy and it is not a kind of a Wollstonecraft is wrong if this backpack is a kind of a Dimorphotheca. fact14: That this backpack is a Sundacarpus is right. fact15: Fausto is a names.

fact1: ({FB}{a} & {DR}{a}) fact2: ¬{D}{a} -> ¬({B}{bk} & ¬{E}{bk}) fact3: (x): {A}x -> {C}x fact4: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{C}{b} fact5: ({B}{a} & {C}{a}) -> ¬{A}{b} fact6: (x): ¬(¬{F}x & ¬{G}x) -> ¬{D}x fact7: ({IR}{a} & {CR}{a}) fact8: (x): ¬({A}x & {C}x) -> ¬{A}x fact9: {B}{fk} fact10: (x): ¬({B}x & ¬{E}x) -> ¬{B}x fact11: ({HR}{al} & {A}{al}) fact12: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({B}x & {D}x) fact13: {H}{b} -> ¬(¬{F}{a} & ¬{G}{a}) fact14: {B}{b} fact15: {A}{a}

That paleocerebellum is not a names.

¬{A}{bk}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Fausto diffuses effectuality and radios. fact2: The fact that that paleocerebellum is a Sundacarpus but it is not a Cordaitaceae is wrong if Fausto does not edge spiked. fact3: If something is a kind of a names it is a holonymy. fact4: The fact that this backpack is not a kind of a holonymy is not wrong if Fausto is a names and a Sundacarpus. fact5: This backpack is not a names if Fausto is a kind of a Sundacarpus and she/he is a holonymy. fact6: Someone does not edge spiked if that it does not glamourise encephalopathy and is not a kind of a Wollstonecraft does not hold. fact7: Fausto is unpolished and overplays deftness. fact8: Something is not a names if that this is a names and a holonymy is incorrect. fact9: This asker is a Sundacarpus. fact10: Something is not a kind of a Sundacarpus if that this thing is a Sundacarpus and this thing is not a kind of a Cordaitaceae does not hold. fact11: The mapper is narrow thing that is a names. fact12: If something is not a Cordaitaceae then it is a Sundacarpus and it edges spiked. fact13: The fact that Fausto does not glamourise encephalopathy and it is not a kind of a Wollstonecraft is wrong if this backpack is a kind of a Dimorphotheca. fact14: That this backpack is a Sundacarpus is right. fact15: Fausto is a names. ; $hypothesis$ = This backpack is not a kind of a holonymy. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

The fact that everything is a Huygens is wrong.

¬((x): {A}x)

fact1: Everything is a kind of a Yukawa. fact2: Everybody is an excellence.

fact1: (x): {HF}x fact2: (x): {FM}x

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Everything is a kind of a Yukawa. fact2: Everybody is an excellence. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that everything is a Huygens is wrong. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That deviating vagrancy does not occurs.

¬{A}

fact1: The fact that the murmuring impossibility does not occurs hold. fact2: The extension and this non-foliatedness occurs. fact3: This prayer does not occurs. fact4: This cerebrovascularness and that deviating vagrancy occurs if that this practice does not occurs hold. fact5: That this schooling pestilence happens yields either that the retribution occurs or this non-ignobleness or both. fact6: This whiff occurs. fact7: The bicentennial happens. fact8: That deviating vagrancy but notthis practice happens.

fact1: ¬{ID} fact2: ({ER} & ¬{IF}) fact3: ¬{DL} fact4: ¬{B} -> ({JJ} & {A}) fact5: {E} -> ({D} v ¬{C}) fact6: {HU} fact7: {F} fact8: ({A} & ¬{B})

This cerebrovascularness happens.

{JJ}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that the murmuring impossibility does not occurs hold. fact2: The extension and this non-foliatedness occurs. fact3: This prayer does not occurs. fact4: This cerebrovascularness and that deviating vagrancy occurs if that this practice does not occurs hold. fact5: That this schooling pestilence happens yields either that the retribution occurs or this non-ignobleness or both. fact6: This whiff occurs. fact7: The bicentennial happens. fact8: That deviating vagrancy but notthis practice happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That deviating vagrancy does not occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This narcotisinging bronchitis does not happens.

¬{C}

fact1: That this narcotisinging bronchitis happens is brought about by that that subduing Hammerstein does not occurs or that this narcotisinging bronchitis happens or both. fact2: That legislation does not happens if the flyover and that meagerliness happens. fact3: That that consisting does not happens results in that this educing and this segregation occurs. fact4: This humming happens. fact5: If that shuddering happens then that that consolidating Pueraria does not happens and that whipping does not happens does not hold. fact6: If that that consolidating Pueraria does not happens and that whipping does not occurs is incorrect that consisting does not occurs. fact7: That subduing Hammerstein occurs. fact8: That this quadrupedalness occurs and this Nordic happens yields that that disjunctness does not happens. fact9: If this educing occurs that desecrating Serratia happens and this narcotisinging bronchitis does not happens. fact10: That fragmentation happens. fact11: That shuddering and that clewing Custer occurs if that bisection does not occurs. fact12: That both that roiling and this humming happens is triggered by that that subduing Hammerstein does not occurs. fact13: That inculpatoriness and that cannulation occurs. fact14: That lulling EXEC happens. fact15: That this humming does not occurs causes that that subduing Hammerstein does not occurs and/or this narcotisinging bronchitis. fact16: If that desecrating Serratia happens but this narcotisinging bronchitis does not occurs that subduing Hammerstein does not happens.

fact1: (¬{B} v {C}) -> {C} fact2: ({GD} & {IO}) -> ¬{ID} fact3: ¬{G} -> ({E} & {F}) fact4: {A} fact5: {J} -> ¬(¬{H} & ¬{I}) fact6: ¬(¬{H} & ¬{I}) -> ¬{G} fact7: {B} fact8: ({HA} & {AQ}) -> ¬{AM} fact9: {E} -> ({D} & ¬{C}) fact10: {HH} fact11: ¬{L} -> ({J} & {K}) fact12: ¬{B} -> ({DP} & {A}) fact13: ({EF} & {HK}) fact14: {FU} fact15: ¬{A} -> (¬{B} v {C}) fact16: ({D} & ¬{C}) -> ¬{B}

That roiling occurs.

{DP}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That this narcotisinging bronchitis happens is brought about by that that subduing Hammerstein does not occurs or that this narcotisinging bronchitis happens or both. fact2: That legislation does not happens if the flyover and that meagerliness happens. fact3: That that consisting does not happens results in that this educing and this segregation occurs. fact4: This humming happens. fact5: If that shuddering happens then that that consolidating Pueraria does not happens and that whipping does not happens does not hold. fact6: If that that consolidating Pueraria does not happens and that whipping does not occurs is incorrect that consisting does not occurs. fact7: That subduing Hammerstein occurs. fact8: That this quadrupedalness occurs and this Nordic happens yields that that disjunctness does not happens. fact9: If this educing occurs that desecrating Serratia happens and this narcotisinging bronchitis does not happens. fact10: That fragmentation happens. fact11: That shuddering and that clewing Custer occurs if that bisection does not occurs. fact12: That both that roiling and this humming happens is triggered by that that subduing Hammerstein does not occurs. fact13: That inculpatoriness and that cannulation occurs. fact14: That lulling EXEC happens. fact15: That this humming does not occurs causes that that subduing Hammerstein does not occurs and/or this narcotisinging bronchitis. fact16: If that desecrating Serratia happens but this narcotisinging bronchitis does not occurs that subduing Hammerstein does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = This narcotisinging bronchitis does not happens. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That both that actinomycetalness and this directing Suidae happens is incorrect.

¬({C} & {D})

fact1: That actinomycetalness happens if that fastingness does not occurs. fact2: That fastingness does not happens if that unintelligibleness occurs. fact3: The quitclaim prevents that this crouching occurs. fact4: The flexibleness does not occurs. fact5: That forwarding occurs. fact6: That unintelligibleness and/or that that fastingness occurs is brought about by that non-actinomycetalness. fact7: That unintelligibleness occurs. fact8: The stunt does not happens. fact9: The disclosure occurs and this sailing premiss happens. fact10: That that screwing Mithraicism does not happens is prevented by that this conserving gnarled does not occurs. fact11: The damper and that glyptography happens. fact12: That the judgement does not occurs is not wrong. fact13: If the hoofeding happens that katharsis does not happens. fact14: The undeclaredness happens. fact15: The Mesolithicness happens. fact16: That untwisting unintelligibility occurs and the crushing occurs. fact17: The biaxateness does not occurs. fact18: The contaminating flaring does not occurs. fact19: The fact that that lenience occurs is incorrect. fact20: This raving occurs. fact21: The outpouring does not happens. fact22: The Javanness happens. fact23: That Demoticness occurs. fact24: This directing Suidae occurs.

fact1: ¬{B} -> {C} fact2: {A} -> ¬{B} fact3: {FN} -> ¬{EI} fact4: ¬{FL} fact5: {CM} fact6: ¬{C} -> ({A} v {B}) fact7: {A} fact8: ¬{CK} fact9: ({FO} & {HQ}) fact10: ¬{HR} -> {DR} fact11: ({CT} & {EH}) fact12: ¬{DD} fact13: {CA} -> ¬{AT} fact14: {IA} fact15: {I} fact16: ({IM} & {GI}) fact17: ¬{EP} fact18: ¬{AM} fact19: ¬{GG} fact20: {BC} fact21: ¬{H} fact22: {EN} fact23: {IT} fact24: {D}

The actinalness happens.

{AF}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That actinomycetalness happens if that fastingness does not occurs. fact2: That fastingness does not happens if that unintelligibleness occurs. fact3: The quitclaim prevents that this crouching occurs. fact4: The flexibleness does not occurs. fact5: That forwarding occurs. fact6: That unintelligibleness and/or that that fastingness occurs is brought about by that non-actinomycetalness. fact7: That unintelligibleness occurs. fact8: The stunt does not happens. fact9: The disclosure occurs and this sailing premiss happens. fact10: That that screwing Mithraicism does not happens is prevented by that this conserving gnarled does not occurs. fact11: The damper and that glyptography happens. fact12: That the judgement does not occurs is not wrong. fact13: If the hoofeding happens that katharsis does not happens. fact14: The undeclaredness happens. fact15: The Mesolithicness happens. fact16: That untwisting unintelligibility occurs and the crushing occurs. fact17: The biaxateness does not occurs. fact18: The contaminating flaring does not occurs. fact19: The fact that that lenience occurs is incorrect. fact20: This raving occurs. fact21: The outpouring does not happens. fact22: The Javanness happens. fact23: That Demoticness occurs. fact24: This directing Suidae occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That both that actinomycetalness and this directing Suidae happens is incorrect. ; $proof$ =

fact2 & fact7 -> int1: That fastingness does not happens.; int1 & fact1 -> int2: That actinomycetalness happens.; int2 & fact24 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That sago is an explosive and it is a Pollux.

({A}{aa} & {B}{aa})

fact1: That that that sago ruddles chinked and does not withdraw Phoca is not true hold if it does not bourgeon. fact2: That sago does not bourgeon. fact3: Somebody is an explosive if it is a doubting. fact4: That sago agnizes Islamophobia and is a doubting. fact5: If that berm does not bourgeon then that that sago is an explosive and it is a Pollux is incorrect. fact6: If that that berm either does not release Pluvialis or is microscopic or both is not right that berm does not agnize Islamophobia. fact7: Some man is a Pollux if the fact that it ruddles chinked and does not withdraw Phoca is incorrect.

fact1: ¬{C}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) fact2: ¬{C}{aa} fact3: (x): {D}x -> {A}x fact4: ({E}{aa} & {D}{aa}) fact5: ¬{C}{a} -> ¬({A}{aa} & {B}{aa}) fact6: ¬(¬{G}{a} v {F}{a}) -> ¬{E}{a} fact7: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x

The fact that that sago is an explosive and it is a kind of a Pollux does not hold.

¬({A}{aa} & {B}{aa})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That that that sago ruddles chinked and does not withdraw Phoca is not true hold if it does not bourgeon. fact2: That sago does not bourgeon. fact3: Somebody is an explosive if it is a doubting. fact4: That sago agnizes Islamophobia and is a doubting. fact5: If that berm does not bourgeon then that that sago is an explosive and it is a Pollux is incorrect. fact6: If that that berm either does not release Pluvialis or is microscopic or both is not right that berm does not agnize Islamophobia. fact7: Some man is a Pollux if the fact that it ruddles chinked and does not withdraw Phoca is incorrect. ; $hypothesis$ = That sago is an explosive and it is a Pollux. ; $proof$ =

fact7 -> int1: That sago is a Pollux if the fact that the person ruddles chinked and does not withdraw Phoca is not correct.; fact2 & fact1 -> int2: The fact that that sago does ruddle chinked and does not withdraw Phoca does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That sago is a Pollux.; fact3 -> int4: That sago is a kind of an explosive if it is a doubting.; fact4 -> int5: That sago is a doubting.; int4 & int5 -> int6: That sago is an explosive.; int3 & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

Aman does not kayak title.

¬{D}{c}

fact1: This cobber does not gum fistful if that that cricket is a retreated is not incorrect. fact2: That cricket is a rash. fact3: If that cricket is a rash and/or is a retreated this cobber does not gum fistful. fact4: If this cobber does not gum fistful then Aman does not kayak title.

fact1: {B}{a} -> ¬{C}{b} fact2: {A}{a} fact3: ({A}{a} v {B}{a}) -> ¬{C}{b} fact4: ¬{C}{b} -> ¬{D}{c}

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: This cobber does not gum fistful if that that cricket is a retreated is not incorrect. fact2: That cricket is a rash. fact3: If that cricket is a rash and/or is a retreated this cobber does not gum fistful. fact4: If this cobber does not gum fistful then Aman does not kayak title. ; $hypothesis$ = Aman does not kayak title. ; $proof$ =

fact2 -> int1: That cricket is a rash or a retreated or both.; int1 & fact3 -> int2: This cobber does not gum fistful.; int2 & fact4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

The fact that this motive is undelineated and is a Fatah does not hold.

¬({A}{a} & {C}{a})

fact1: This motive accuses monandry and is a kind of a aphasic. fact2: This motive constipates Sheffield. fact3: That cymbid is a Fatah that bicycles sexed. fact4: This motive quits. fact5: This motive launches animatronics and is a price. fact6: The infantryman winters. fact7: This motive is absorptive. fact8: This motive is undelineated and it winters. fact9: The grandee is undelineated.

fact1: ({EO}{a} & {BI}{a}) fact2: {AK}{a} fact3: ({C}{cj} & {DK}{cj}) fact4: {GQ}{a} fact5: ({FS}{a} & {FE}{a}) fact6: {B}{ae} fact7: {EA}{a} fact8: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact9: {A}{eh}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This motive accuses monandry and is a kind of a aphasic. fact2: This motive constipates Sheffield. fact3: That cymbid is a Fatah that bicycles sexed. fact4: This motive quits. fact5: This motive launches animatronics and is a price. fact6: The infantryman winters. fact7: This motive is absorptive. fact8: This motive is undelineated and it winters. fact9: The grandee is undelineated. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that this motive is undelineated and is a Fatah does not hold. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This strangling occurs.

{C}

fact1: That this malnourisheding Cabombaceae happens prevents this strangling. fact2: If that this strangling or that sloughing or both occurs does not hold then that troubling neoromanticism does not happens. fact3: The spitting Pelew happens. fact4: The fact that the zygomorphousness does not occurs is true. fact5: The fact that this narrowing happens and/or this normalness does not happens does not hold. fact6: That troubling neoromanticism does not occurs if that sloughing does not occurs. fact7: The elating Mitchum does not happens. fact8: That either that gilding Lennon happens or that prisonbreak does not happens or both does not hold. fact9: That retroactiveness is prevented by that that tameness happens or that protest happens or both. fact10: The foul does not occurs if the pirouetting and/or the pleasing occurs. fact11: The fact that either this fluffing happens or the retake does not happens or both is incorrect. fact12: This malnourisheding Cabombaceae and/or that that troubling neoromanticism happens brings about that this strangling does not occurs. fact13: This narrowing does not occurs.

fact1: {A} -> ¬{C} fact2: ¬({C} v {D}) -> ¬{B} fact3: {HA} fact4: ¬{CP} fact5: ¬({AA} v ¬{AB}) fact6: ¬{D} -> ¬{B} fact7: ¬{DG} fact8: ¬({GQ} v ¬{GB}) fact9: ({HS} v {FH}) -> ¬{IS} fact10: ({EN} v {AE}) -> ¬{BM} fact11: ¬({FE} v ¬{II}) fact12: ({A} v {B}) -> ¬{C} fact13: ¬{AA}

The latching tactfulness occurs.

{EO}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That this malnourisheding Cabombaceae happens prevents this strangling. fact2: If that this strangling or that sloughing or both occurs does not hold then that troubling neoromanticism does not happens. fact3: The spitting Pelew happens. fact4: The fact that the zygomorphousness does not occurs is true. fact5: The fact that this narrowing happens and/or this normalness does not happens does not hold. fact6: That troubling neoromanticism does not occurs if that sloughing does not occurs. fact7: The elating Mitchum does not happens. fact8: That either that gilding Lennon happens or that prisonbreak does not happens or both does not hold. fact9: That retroactiveness is prevented by that that tameness happens or that protest happens or both. fact10: The foul does not occurs if the pirouetting and/or the pleasing occurs. fact11: The fact that either this fluffing happens or the retake does not happens or both is incorrect. fact12: This malnourisheding Cabombaceae and/or that that troubling neoromanticism happens brings about that this strangling does not occurs. fact13: This narrowing does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = This strangling occurs. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

The fact that that sauceboat is clearing but it does not rattle Gomphotheriidae hold if it is not gloveless.

¬{A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa})

fact1: Some person is Phoenician and does not detach if it is a phobophobia. fact2: That sauceboat is both Phoenician and not Austrian if it does not rattle Gomphotheriidae. fact3: That that sauceboat is clearing and does not rattle Gomphotheriidae if that sauceboat is not non-gloveless is true. fact4: If the cheetah is not clearing it does not sing. fact5: Something does not rattle Gomphotheriidae if it is not gloveless. fact6: Some person is clearing and does not rattle Gomphotheriidae if it is gloveless. fact7: If that sauceboat is not clearing it is not a Nephthys. fact8: If that sauceboat is not gloveless then that sauceboat does not rattle Gomphotheriidae.

fact1: (x): {IT}x -> ({EO}x & ¬{JK}x) fact2: ¬{AB}{aa} -> ({EO}{aa} & ¬{AO}{aa}) fact3: {A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) fact4: ¬{AA}{af} -> ¬{IM}{af} fact5: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬{AB}x fact6: (x): {A}x -> ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact7: ¬{AA}{aa} -> ¬{FR}{aa} fact8: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬{AB}{aa}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Some person is Phoenician and does not detach if it is a phobophobia. fact2: That sauceboat is both Phoenician and not Austrian if it does not rattle Gomphotheriidae. fact3: That that sauceboat is clearing and does not rattle Gomphotheriidae if that sauceboat is not non-gloveless is true. fact4: If the cheetah is not clearing it does not sing. fact5: Something does not rattle Gomphotheriidae if it is not gloveless. fact6: Some person is clearing and does not rattle Gomphotheriidae if it is gloveless. fact7: If that sauceboat is not clearing it is not a Nephthys. fact8: If that sauceboat is not gloveless then that sauceboat does not rattle Gomphotheriidae. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that sauceboat is clearing but it does not rattle Gomphotheriidae hold if it is not gloveless. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That phrenologist is a kind of a shivah.

{C}{b}

fact1: That the fact that this motorist is not a psychophysiology but it tusks Aragon does not hold hold if this motorist does not profane. fact2: If that patchcord is not a millime and he is not a Saururus then that phrenologist is not a shivah. fact3: Someone is not a millime and not a Saururus if it is not scalable. fact4: A non-antistrophic man is not a hebdomad and not scalable. fact5: This motorist does not profane. fact6: If some person is a shivah then it is a morbidness. fact7: That rutile is a shivah. fact8: If that sulfonamide does not bundle sophism and does rationalise Odessa that patchcord is not antistrophic. fact9: If that patchcord is a shivah then that phrenologist is a millime. fact10: Someone does not bundle sophism but it rationalises Odessa if it unpicks. fact11: That patchcord is a kind of a millime. fact12: That patchcord is a Saururus and is a millime. fact13: Something is a millime and this thing is a Saururus if this thing is not scalable.

fact1: ¬{L}{d} -> ¬(¬{J}{d} & {K}{d}) fact2: (¬{B}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) -> ¬{C}{b} fact3: (x): ¬{D}x -> (¬{B}x & ¬{A}x) fact4: (x): ¬{F}x -> (¬{E}x & ¬{D}x) fact5: ¬{L}{d} fact6: (x): {C}x -> {BL}x fact7: {C}{hs} fact8: (¬{H}{c} & {G}{c}) -> ¬{F}{a} fact9: {C}{a} -> {B}{b} fact10: (x): {I}x -> (¬{H}x & {G}x) fact11: {B}{a} fact12: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact13: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({B}x & {A}x)

That rutile is a morbidness and is a kind of a millime.

({BL}{hs} & {B}{hs})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That the fact that this motorist is not a psychophysiology but it tusks Aragon does not hold hold if this motorist does not profane. fact2: If that patchcord is not a millime and he is not a Saururus then that phrenologist is not a shivah. fact3: Someone is not a millime and not a Saururus if it is not scalable. fact4: A non-antistrophic man is not a hebdomad and not scalable. fact5: This motorist does not profane. fact6: If some person is a shivah then it is a morbidness. fact7: That rutile is a shivah. fact8: If that sulfonamide does not bundle sophism and does rationalise Odessa that patchcord is not antistrophic. fact9: If that patchcord is a shivah then that phrenologist is a millime. fact10: Someone does not bundle sophism but it rationalises Odessa if it unpicks. fact11: That patchcord is a kind of a millime. fact12: That patchcord is a Saururus and is a millime. fact13: Something is a millime and this thing is a Saururus if this thing is not scalable. ; $hypothesis$ = That phrenologist is a kind of a shivah. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That spic is not a Frisian.

¬{A}{a}

fact1: If the fact that somebody is effective or is not a kind of a bang or both does not hold then it is not a plumpness. fact2: If the fact that someone is not a Frisian and he is not effective is incorrect he is a Frisian. fact3: That spic is not a same and it is not a plumpness. fact4: The intima is not a kind of a plumpness.

fact1: (x): ¬({C}x v ¬{D}x) -> ¬{B}x fact2: (x): ¬(¬{A}x & ¬{C}x) -> {A}x fact3: (¬{CF}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) fact4: ¬{B}{im}

That spic is a Frisian.

{A}{a}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If the fact that somebody is effective or is not a kind of a bang or both does not hold then it is not a plumpness. fact2: If the fact that someone is not a Frisian and he is not effective is incorrect he is a Frisian. fact3: That spic is not a same and it is not a plumpness. fact4: The intima is not a kind of a plumpness. ; $hypothesis$ = That spic is not a Frisian. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This hydrazine is not a prankishness.

¬{C}{c}

fact1: This butterscotch is a malevolence. fact2: This butterscotch is not a prankishness and is a malevolence if this gynobase is not visible. fact3: Somebody does not intertwine Eisenstaedt. fact4: If this gynobase is a malevolence then this hydrazine is a prankishness. fact5: This butterscotch is invisible. fact6: This gynobase is a malevolence if this butterscotch is invisible.

fact1: {B}{a} fact2: {A}{b} -> (¬{C}{a} & {B}{a}) fact3: (Ex): ¬{F}x fact4: {B}{b} -> {C}{c} fact5: {A}{a} fact6: {A}{a} -> {B}{b}

This hydrazine is not a prankishness.

¬{C}{c}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This butterscotch is a malevolence. fact2: This butterscotch is not a prankishness and is a malevolence if this gynobase is not visible. fact3: Somebody does not intertwine Eisenstaedt. fact4: If this gynobase is a malevolence then this hydrazine is a prankishness. fact5: This butterscotch is invisible. fact6: This gynobase is a malevolence if this butterscotch is invisible. ; $hypothesis$ = This hydrazine is not a prankishness. ; $proof$ =

fact6 & fact5 -> int1: This gynobase is a malevolence.; int1 & fact4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__