Datasets:

hitachi-nlp

/

FLD.v2.reimpl

like 0

0.3

This virusoid braves.

{A}{a}

fact1: If the fact that this virusoid is not a kind of a query but this one wrings Himantoglossum is wrong then this one is anagogical. fact2: That the sudor is not anagogical is not incorrect if this equipment is anagogical. fact3: Someone is anagogical and it is a bed if it does not wring Himantoglossum. fact4: Somebody is not cubital and is not a Aristotelia if it is anagogical. fact5: Something is not an ease if that thing is a ninety. fact6: This besom is not cubital and is a Aristotelia if that genipap is anagogical. fact7: This equipment does not wring Himantoglossum if that that one is not a rowdiness and that one is a query does not hold. fact8: The thill is a query. fact9: This gobbet braves. fact10: The fact that someone is a Aristotelia and is cubital does not hold if the person is non-anagogical. fact11: If this equipment is not an ease that this equipment is not a rowdiness but that person is a query does not hold. fact12: If this besom is a rowdiness then that this virusoid is not a query and wrings Himantoglossum does not hold. fact13: If something that is not cubital is not a kind of a Aristotelia it braves. fact14: If the sudor is not anagogical then that genipap is anagogical.

fact1: ¬(¬{G}{a} & {F}{a}) -> {D}{a} fact2: {D}{e} -> ¬{D}{d} fact3: (x): ¬{F}x -> ({D}x & {E}x) fact4: (x): {D}x -> (¬{B}x & ¬{C}x) fact5: (x): {J}x -> ¬{I}x fact6: {D}{c} -> (¬{B}{b} & {C}{b}) fact7: ¬(¬{H}{e} & {G}{e}) -> ¬{F}{e} fact8: {G}{ft} fact9: {A}{fb} fact10: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬({C}x & {B}x) fact11: ¬{I}{e} -> ¬(¬{H}{e} & {G}{e}) fact12: {H}{b} -> ¬(¬{G}{a} & {F}{a}) fact13: (x): (¬{B}x & ¬{C}x) -> {A}x fact14: ¬{D}{d} -> {D}{c}

This virusoid does not brave.

¬{A}{a}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If the fact that this virusoid is not a kind of a query but this one wrings Himantoglossum is wrong then this one is anagogical. fact2: That the sudor is not anagogical is not incorrect if this equipment is anagogical. fact3: Someone is anagogical and it is a bed if it does not wring Himantoglossum. fact4: Somebody is not cubital and is not a Aristotelia if it is anagogical. fact5: Something is not an ease if that thing is a ninety. fact6: This besom is not cubital and is a Aristotelia if that genipap is anagogical. fact7: This equipment does not wring Himantoglossum if that that one is not a rowdiness and that one is a query does not hold. fact8: The thill is a query. fact9: This gobbet braves. fact10: The fact that someone is a Aristotelia and is cubital does not hold if the person is non-anagogical. fact11: If this equipment is not an ease that this equipment is not a rowdiness but that person is a query does not hold. fact12: If this besom is a rowdiness then that this virusoid is not a query and wrings Himantoglossum does not hold. fact13: If something that is not cubital is not a kind of a Aristotelia it braves. fact14: If the sudor is not anagogical then that genipap is anagogical. ; $hypothesis$ = This virusoid braves. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This apex is not biotitic but it is undetected.

(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a})

fact1: the Thespesia hashes apex. fact2: This apex is both not opening and agonal. fact3: If this apex hashes Thespesia then this apex is not biotitic but it is undetected. fact4: This Circe is not a nationality but it does hash Thespesia. fact5: This apex hashes Thespesia. fact6: This flatfoot is not a esthesis and hashes Thespesia. fact7: If this apex is not non-umbelliform the fact that this apex is not careless but the thing is undetected hold. fact8: This apex is not unargumentative. fact9: The ala does not sideswipe saratoga if the thing hashes Thespesia. fact10: The imago is both detected and not non-revolutionary. fact11: This apex is not boracic but he does hash Thespesia if this apex is a kind of a Maillol.

fact1: {AC}{aa} fact2: (¬{P}{a} & {GN}{a}) fact3: {A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact4: (¬{CC}{es} & {A}{es}) fact5: {A}{a} fact6: (¬{GQ}{ho} & {A}{ho}) fact7: {EF}{a} -> (¬{IA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact8: ¬{FU}{a} fact9: {A}{fl} -> ¬{GP}{fl} fact10: (¬{AB}{s} & {GC}{s}) fact11: {CO}{a} -> (¬{JE}{a} & {A}{a})

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: the Thespesia hashes apex. fact2: This apex is both not opening and agonal. fact3: If this apex hashes Thespesia then this apex is not biotitic but it is undetected. fact4: This Circe is not a nationality but it does hash Thespesia. fact5: This apex hashes Thespesia. fact6: This flatfoot is not a esthesis and hashes Thespesia. fact7: If this apex is not non-umbelliform the fact that this apex is not careless but the thing is undetected hold. fact8: This apex is not unargumentative. fact9: The ala does not sideswipe saratoga if the thing hashes Thespesia. fact10: The imago is both detected and not non-revolutionary. fact11: This apex is not boracic but he does hash Thespesia if this apex is a kind of a Maillol. ; $hypothesis$ = This apex is not biotitic but it is undetected. ; $proof$ =

fact3 & fact5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This marjoram is not a kind of a meeting but it is calcifugous.

(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa})

fact1: That something that does not mould FAO is not a meeting and is calcifugous is correct. fact2: The fact that something moulds FAO and this thing is mesonic does not hold if this thing is a kind of a meeting. fact3: The fact that this watermelon is calcifugous and a meeting is wrong if it is mesonic. fact4: If this marjoram is mesonic then this watermelon is calcifugous. fact5: That the fact that this watermelon is non-mesonic is false hold. fact6: That this watermelon is calcifugous hold. fact7: The fact that somebody is a kind of calcifugous one that moulds FAO does not hold if it is mesonic. fact8: The fact that that someone does not roughen quadrillion and is not non-economical is true does not hold if the person is a astheny. fact9: Somebody that is not economical does not mould FAO and is mesonic. fact10: The fact that something is not a meeting and is calcifugous is wrong if it does mould FAO. fact11: If this watermelon is mesonic this marjoram moulds FAO. fact12: The fact that this watermelon is not mesonic and moulds FAO is false. fact13: If somebody is mesonic then the fact that it is not calcifugous and moulds FAO is false. fact14: This watermelon is a kind of a meeting if this marjoram is mesonic. fact15: That this watermelon is not a Monochamus and is praetorian does not hold if this watermelon craves. fact16: The fact that this marjoram is mesonic and it moulds FAO is incorrect. fact17: If some man does mould FAO then that it is not calcifugous and is mesonic is not correct. fact18: That this marjoram is not a kind of a Tipuana but this person is a ketoaciduria does not hold if this person moulds FAO.

fact1: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) fact2: (x): {AA}x -> ¬({A}x & {B}x) fact3: {B}{a} -> ¬({AB}{a} & {AA}{a}) fact4: {B}{aa} -> {AB}{a} fact5: {B}{a} fact6: {AB}{a} fact7: (x): {B}x -> ¬({AB}x & {A}x) fact8: (x): {CC}x -> ¬(¬{BR}x & {C}x) fact9: (x): ¬{C}x -> (¬{A}x & {B}x) fact10: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) fact11: {B}{a} -> {A}{aa} fact12: ¬(¬{B}{a} & {A}{a}) fact13: (x): {B}x -> ¬(¬{AB}x & {A}x) fact14: {B}{aa} -> {AA}{a} fact15: {AU}{a} -> ¬(¬{S}{a} & {CT}{a}) fact16: ¬({B}{aa} & {A}{aa}) fact17: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{AB}x & {B}x) fact18: {A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{HQ}{aa} & {IM}{aa})

This marjoram is not a kind of a meeting but it is calcifugous.

(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That something that does not mould FAO is not a meeting and is calcifugous is correct. fact2: The fact that something moulds FAO and this thing is mesonic does not hold if this thing is a kind of a meeting. fact3: The fact that this watermelon is calcifugous and a meeting is wrong if it is mesonic. fact4: If this marjoram is mesonic then this watermelon is calcifugous. fact5: That the fact that this watermelon is non-mesonic is false hold. fact6: That this watermelon is calcifugous hold. fact7: The fact that somebody is a kind of calcifugous one that moulds FAO does not hold if it is mesonic. fact8: The fact that that someone does not roughen quadrillion and is not non-economical is true does not hold if the person is a astheny. fact9: Somebody that is not economical does not mould FAO and is mesonic. fact10: The fact that something is not a meeting and is calcifugous is wrong if it does mould FAO. fact11: If this watermelon is mesonic this marjoram moulds FAO. fact12: The fact that this watermelon is not mesonic and moulds FAO is false. fact13: If somebody is mesonic then the fact that it is not calcifugous and moulds FAO is false. fact14: This watermelon is a kind of a meeting if this marjoram is mesonic. fact15: That this watermelon is not a Monochamus and is praetorian does not hold if this watermelon craves. fact16: The fact that this marjoram is mesonic and it moulds FAO is incorrect. fact17: If some man does mould FAO then that it is not calcifugous and is mesonic is not correct. fact18: That this marjoram is not a kind of a Tipuana but this person is a ketoaciduria does not hold if this person moulds FAO. ; $hypothesis$ = This marjoram is not a kind of a meeting but it is calcifugous. ; $proof$ =

fact10 -> int1: The fact that this marjoram is not a meeting and is calcifugous does not hold if that this marjoram moulds FAO hold.; fact5 & fact11 -> int2: This marjoram does mould FAO.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This rent is a billed.

{B}{c}

fact1: That if someone is a Mozambique then that it is a kind of a tailoring and it is not a kind of a Ulysses is not correct is true. fact2: If a non-biographic man is thermionic this Cu is not non-biographic. fact3: If Tita is not a Mozambique then that this Cu is a tailoring that does not rearrange inexpensiveness does not hold. fact4: Something is not a Mozambique or is thrifty or both if it acquires. fact5: If some man is not thermionic then the takeaway is not biographic but thermionic. fact6: The fact that this Cu is a tailoring and rearranges inexpensiveness is incorrect if Tita is not a Mozambique. fact7: If that lithograph is a claque then that lithograph does not mosey and thaws Megaptera. fact8: That lithograph is a claque. fact9: This Tai is not thermionic if that lithograph does not mosey and thaws Megaptera. fact10: This Cu is thrifty. fact11: If this Cu is non-biographic Tita crosses sclerosis and this one acquires. fact12: Tita is not a kind of a Mozambique. fact13: That if this Cu is a kind of thrifty thing that does not acquire Tita is not a billed hold. fact14: The fact that this Cu is a tailoring and does rearrange inexpensiveness does not hold. fact15: This rent is a billed if this Cu rearranges inexpensiveness. fact16: If this Cu is not a tailoring then that this rent is a kind of a billed but it is not a kind of a Mozambique does not hold.

fact1: (x): {A}x -> ¬({AA}x & ¬{HP}x) fact2: (x): (¬{F}x & {H}x) -> ¬{F}{b} fact3: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact4: (x): {D}x -> (¬{A}x v {C}x) fact5: (x): ¬{H}x -> (¬{F}{d} & {H}{d}) fact6: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact7: {J}{f} -> (¬{G}{f} & {I}{f}) fact8: {J}{f} fact9: (¬{G}{f} & {I}{f}) -> ¬{H}{e} fact10: {C}{b} fact11: ¬{F}{b} -> ({E}{a} & {D}{a}) fact12: ¬{A}{a} fact13: ({C}{b} & ¬{D}{b}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact14: ¬({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact15: {AB}{b} -> {B}{c} fact16: ¬{AA}{b} -> ¬({B}{c} & ¬{A}{c})

This rent is not a kind of a billed.

¬{B}{c}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That if someone is a Mozambique then that it is a kind of a tailoring and it is not a kind of a Ulysses is not correct is true. fact2: If a non-biographic man is thermionic this Cu is not non-biographic. fact3: If Tita is not a Mozambique then that this Cu is a tailoring that does not rearrange inexpensiveness does not hold. fact4: Something is not a Mozambique or is thrifty or both if it acquires. fact5: If some man is not thermionic then the takeaway is not biographic but thermionic. fact6: The fact that this Cu is a tailoring and rearranges inexpensiveness is incorrect if Tita is not a Mozambique. fact7: If that lithograph is a claque then that lithograph does not mosey and thaws Megaptera. fact8: That lithograph is a claque. fact9: This Tai is not thermionic if that lithograph does not mosey and thaws Megaptera. fact10: This Cu is thrifty. fact11: If this Cu is non-biographic Tita crosses sclerosis and this one acquires. fact12: Tita is not a kind of a Mozambique. fact13: That if this Cu is a kind of thrifty thing that does not acquire Tita is not a billed hold. fact14: The fact that this Cu is a tailoring and does rearrange inexpensiveness does not hold. fact15: This rent is a billed if this Cu rearranges inexpensiveness. fact16: If this Cu is not a tailoring then that this rent is a kind of a billed but it is not a kind of a Mozambique does not hold. ; $hypothesis$ = This rent is a billed. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This praseodymium draws oncology.

{E}{c}

fact1: That spinet hypothecates but that thing does not outlive laterality. fact2: If this pinto is a glutinosity then this praseodymium does not draw oncology. fact3: If this pinto is not uncommitted then this praseodymium does not draw oncology. fact4: This pinto is a glutinosity and/or it is not uncommitted if that spinet does not outlive laterality.

fact1: ({A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) fact2: {D}{b} -> ¬{E}{c} fact3: ¬{C}{b} -> ¬{E}{c} fact4: ¬{B}{a} -> ({D}{b} v ¬{C}{b})

DISPROVED

DISPROVED

$facts$ = fact1: That spinet hypothecates but that thing does not outlive laterality. fact2: If this pinto is a glutinosity then this praseodymium does not draw oncology. fact3: If this pinto is not uncommitted then this praseodymium does not draw oncology. fact4: This pinto is a glutinosity and/or it is not uncommitted if that spinet does not outlive laterality. ; $hypothesis$ = This praseodymium draws oncology. ; $proof$ =

fact1 -> int1: That spinet does not outlive laterality.; int1 & fact4 -> int2: This pinto is a glutinosity and/or it is not uncommitted.; int2 & fact2 & fact3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This surprisal occurs.

{B}

fact1: That rumination happens and this surprisal occurs. fact2: Both that rumination and that catering Vermont occurs if this surprisal does not happens.

fact1: ({A} & {B}) fact2: ¬{B} -> ({A} & {GU})

That catering Vermont occurs.

{GU}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That rumination happens and this surprisal occurs. fact2: Both that rumination and that catering Vermont occurs if this surprisal does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = This surprisal occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That this deist either is a bimester or is not non-Uruguayan or both hold.

({C}{b} v {D}{b})

fact1: If that Jansenist does not Ball Petauristidae this deist is not a yeomanry. fact2: This print does not impoverish Campania if that alecost is not a kind of a Sula. fact3: If somebody does not impoverish Campania then the fact that it is a kind of Ghanaian one that solves acantha is false. fact4: If that alecost does not understand that that alecost is not a kind of an eastward and he/she is not a Ossete is false. fact5: Someone that does refund Berlage is a malice. fact6: If the fact that something is Ghanaian and that solves acantha does not hold then that does not solves acantha. fact7: If that that alecost is not an eastward and it is not a Ossete does not hold then the fact that it is not a kind of a Sula is correct. fact8: That alecost does not understand. fact9: This deist is not a bimester if that Jansenist is non-Uruguayan man that solves acantha. fact10: This print refunds Berlage and the person is polyphase if this print does not exhilarate Logos. fact11: That Jansenist is a yeomanry and it Balls Petauristidae. fact12: This print does not exhilarate Logos if that maxilla defies carnality and does not exhilarate Logos. fact13: If this print does not solve acantha but it is a malice then that Jansenist does not Ball Petauristidae. fact14: That Jansenist Balls Petauristidae. fact15: If some person is not a yeomanry then that it is either a bimester or Uruguayan or both is incorrect.

fact1: ¬{B}{a} -> ¬{A}{b} fact2: ¬{I}{d} -> ¬{H}{c} fact3: (x): ¬{H}x -> ¬({G}x & {E}x) fact4: ¬{P}{d} -> ¬(¬{N}{d} & ¬{M}{d}) fact5: (x): {J}x -> {F}x fact6: (x): ¬({G}x & {E}x) -> ¬{E}x fact7: ¬(¬{N}{d} & ¬{M}{d}) -> ¬{I}{d} fact8: ¬{P}{d} fact9: (¬{D}{a} & {E}{a}) -> ¬{C}{b} fact10: ¬{L}{c} -> ({J}{c} & {K}{c}) fact11: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact12: ({O}{e} & ¬{L}{e}) -> ¬{L}{c} fact13: (¬{E}{c} & {F}{c}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact14: {B}{a} fact15: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({C}x v {D}x)

The fact that this deist is a bimester and/or Uruguayan is false.

¬({C}{b} v {D}{b})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that Jansenist does not Ball Petauristidae this deist is not a yeomanry. fact2: This print does not impoverish Campania if that alecost is not a kind of a Sula. fact3: If somebody does not impoverish Campania then the fact that it is a kind of Ghanaian one that solves acantha is false. fact4: If that alecost does not understand that that alecost is not a kind of an eastward and he/she is not a Ossete is false. fact5: Someone that does refund Berlage is a malice. fact6: If the fact that something is Ghanaian and that solves acantha does not hold then that does not solves acantha. fact7: If that that alecost is not an eastward and it is not a Ossete does not hold then the fact that it is not a kind of a Sula is correct. fact8: That alecost does not understand. fact9: This deist is not a bimester if that Jansenist is non-Uruguayan man that solves acantha. fact10: This print refunds Berlage and the person is polyphase if this print does not exhilarate Logos. fact11: That Jansenist is a yeomanry and it Balls Petauristidae. fact12: This print does not exhilarate Logos if that maxilla defies carnality and does not exhilarate Logos. fact13: If this print does not solve acantha but it is a malice then that Jansenist does not Ball Petauristidae. fact14: That Jansenist Balls Petauristidae. fact15: If some person is not a yeomanry then that it is either a bimester or Uruguayan or both is incorrect. ; $hypothesis$ = That this deist either is a bimester or is not non-Uruguayan or both hold. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That that bridegroom does not embed technique and is apetalous does not hold.

¬(¬{B}{b} & {C}{b})

fact1: That bridegroom is apetalous. fact2: That sparling is not a shape and is non-apetalous if this whipstitching is not a Singan. fact3: If the fact that something is a Singan and it is a kind of a shape is incorrect it is not a shape. fact4: That bridegroom does not embed technique if this is intracutaneous and not non-agonadal. fact5: If that bridegroom is not intracutaneous but it is agonadal it does not embed technique. fact6: The fact that somebody does not embed technique and is apetalous is not true if this one is not a shape. fact7: If that bridegroom is not a muliebrity and is not a kind of a Eurylaimi then that bridegroom smells shadowiness. fact8: That bridegroom is not intracutaneous. fact9: That bridegroom is enteric if that bridegroom smells shadowiness. fact10: If some person is enteric it does not undercoat and is not a kind of a Nereid. fact11: That bridegroom is not intracutaneous and is not non-agonadal if this whipstitching is not a shape. fact12: If this whipstitching does not embed technique and is a shape this whipstitching is not agonadal. fact13: If something is not a shape then it does not embed technique and it looses tercet. fact14: If something does not undercoat the fact that it is a Singan and is a kind of a shape is false. fact15: If this whipstitching is not a kind of a shape then that bridegroom is not intracutaneous.

fact1: {C}{b} fact2: ¬{D}{a} -> (¬{A}{gf} & ¬{C}{gf}) fact3: (x): ¬({D}x & {A}x) -> ¬{A}x fact4: ({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact5: (¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact6: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{B}x & {C}x) fact7: (¬{I}{b} & ¬{J}{b}) -> {H}{b} fact8: ¬{AA}{b} fact9: {H}{b} -> {G}{b} fact10: (x): {G}x -> (¬{E}x & ¬{F}x) fact11: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact12: (¬{B}{a} & {A}{a}) -> ¬{AB}{a} fact13: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{B}x & {FF}x) fact14: (x): ¬{E}x -> ¬({D}x & {A}x) fact15: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{AA}{b}

That sparling does not embed technique but it does loose tercet.

(¬{B}{gf} & {FF}{gf})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That bridegroom is apetalous. fact2: That sparling is not a shape and is non-apetalous if this whipstitching is not a Singan. fact3: If the fact that something is a Singan and it is a kind of a shape is incorrect it is not a shape. fact4: That bridegroom does not embed technique if this is intracutaneous and not non-agonadal. fact5: If that bridegroom is not intracutaneous but it is agonadal it does not embed technique. fact6: The fact that somebody does not embed technique and is apetalous is not true if this one is not a shape. fact7: If that bridegroom is not a muliebrity and is not a kind of a Eurylaimi then that bridegroom smells shadowiness. fact8: That bridegroom is not intracutaneous. fact9: That bridegroom is enteric if that bridegroom smells shadowiness. fact10: If some person is enteric it does not undercoat and is not a kind of a Nereid. fact11: That bridegroom is not intracutaneous and is not non-agonadal if this whipstitching is not a shape. fact12: If this whipstitching does not embed technique and is a shape this whipstitching is not agonadal. fact13: If something is not a shape then it does not embed technique and it looses tercet. fact14: If something does not undercoat the fact that it is a Singan and is a kind of a shape is false. fact15: If this whipstitching is not a kind of a shape then that bridegroom is not intracutaneous. ; $hypothesis$ = That that bridegroom does not embed technique and is apetalous does not hold. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That that unmodifiedness does not occurs and this central does not occurs is wrong.

¬(¬{B} & ¬{C})

fact1: That Somerset does not occurs. fact2: The condylarness does not happens and this thrill does not happens. fact3: The fact that this embarrassing paraparesis does not occurs hold if the fact that this embarrassing paraparesis happens but this drooling does not occurs is false. fact4: That spurring does not occurs. fact5: This conceptualisticness does not happens. fact6: The fact that both that nipping and that ethicalness occurs is correct if this uninjectableness does not occurs. fact7: If that ethicalness occurs then the fact that this non-danishness and this carbonating riel happens does not hold. fact8: If that the fact that this mythicising and this maximisation happens is right is not right this mythicising does not happens. fact9: The fact that this mythicising and this maximisation happens is wrong if that that freckling does not occurs is correct. fact10: If this mythicising does not happens then that that sculpting wittiness but notthis drooling occurs is incorrect. fact11: That freckling does not occurs if the fact that notthe danishness but this carbonating riel happens does not hold. fact12: The ordeal occurs and this darkening malodorousness does not happens. fact13: If that that unmodifiedness happens is true the fact that this embarrassing paraparesis happens but this central does not happens is incorrect. fact14: This embarrassing paraparesis and the modifiedness happens. fact15: The scaling does not happens and the submerging Parcae does not happens. fact16: That Somerset happens if the fact that that sculpting wittiness but notthis drooling happens is incorrect. fact17: If the fact that that Somerset does not happens is true this central does not happens. fact18: This non-tacticalness and this non-gynaecologicalness occurs. fact19: This shuffleboard does not occurs and that caruncularness does not occurs if this embarrassing paraparesis does not occurs. fact20: The fact that that unmodifiedness does not occurs and this central does not occurs is not true if this embarrassing paraparesis does not happens.

fact1: ¬{D} fact2: (¬{FF} & ¬{CH}) fact3: ¬({A} & ¬{E}) -> ¬{A} fact4: ¬{HQ} fact5: ¬{HH} fact6: ¬{N} -> ({M} & {L}) fact7: {L} -> ¬(¬{J} & {K}) fact8: ¬({G} & {H}) -> ¬{G} fact9: ¬{I} -> ¬({G} & {H}) fact10: ¬{G} -> ¬({F} & ¬{E}) fact11: ¬(¬{J} & {K}) -> ¬{I} fact12: ({BA} & ¬{DK}) fact13: {B} -> ¬({A} & ¬{C}) fact14: ({A} & ¬{B}) fact15: (¬{CF} & ¬{JI}) fact16: ¬({F} & ¬{E}) -> {D} fact17: ¬{D} -> ¬{C} fact18: (¬{AB} & ¬{DM}) fact19: ¬{A} -> (¬{AH} & ¬{EE}) fact20: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{B} & ¬{C})

That that unmodifiedness does not occurs and this central does not occurs is wrong.

¬(¬{B} & ¬{C})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That Somerset does not occurs. fact2: The condylarness does not happens and this thrill does not happens. fact3: The fact that this embarrassing paraparesis does not occurs hold if the fact that this embarrassing paraparesis happens but this drooling does not occurs is false. fact4: That spurring does not occurs. fact5: This conceptualisticness does not happens. fact6: The fact that both that nipping and that ethicalness occurs is correct if this uninjectableness does not occurs. fact7: If that ethicalness occurs then the fact that this non-danishness and this carbonating riel happens does not hold. fact8: If that the fact that this mythicising and this maximisation happens is right is not right this mythicising does not happens. fact9: The fact that this mythicising and this maximisation happens is wrong if that that freckling does not occurs is correct. fact10: If this mythicising does not happens then that that sculpting wittiness but notthis drooling occurs is incorrect. fact11: That freckling does not occurs if the fact that notthe danishness but this carbonating riel happens does not hold. fact12: The ordeal occurs and this darkening malodorousness does not happens. fact13: If that that unmodifiedness happens is true the fact that this embarrassing paraparesis happens but this central does not happens is incorrect. fact14: This embarrassing paraparesis and the modifiedness happens. fact15: The scaling does not happens and the submerging Parcae does not happens. fact16: That Somerset happens if the fact that that sculpting wittiness but notthis drooling happens is incorrect. fact17: If the fact that that Somerset does not happens is true this central does not happens. fact18: This non-tacticalness and this non-gynaecologicalness occurs. fact19: This shuffleboard does not occurs and that caruncularness does not occurs if this embarrassing paraparesis does not occurs. fact20: The fact that that unmodifiedness does not occurs and this central does not occurs is not true if this embarrassing paraparesis does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That that unmodifiedness does not occurs and this central does not occurs is wrong. ; $proof$ =

fact14 -> int1: That unmodifiedness does not occurs.; fact17 & fact1 -> int2: This central does not occurs.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

The uncutness happens.

{C}

fact1: If the fact that this inflection does not occurs and that saprobicness does not occurs does not hold then the uncutness happens. fact2: This tribalization happens. fact3: That that saprobicness does not happens causes that the uncutness does not happens and this inflection does not happens. fact4: That the leptosporangiateness does not happens hold. fact5: The fact that this non-uncutness and this non-saprobicness occurs hold if that risking glee happens. fact6: The Chin does not happens. fact7: This inflection does not occurs and this kind does not occurs if that saprobicness does not happens. fact8: This non-philosophicness and this non-passableness happens. fact9: The fact that this inflection occurs but that saprobicness does not occurs is not true. fact10: That academic does not happens. fact11: That this kind does not occurs causes that this barographicness and this dieting happens. fact12: The fact that that transacting Proxima does not happens and the committal does not happens is incorrect. fact13: The skinned occurs. fact14: That risking glee does not occurs and that saprobicness does not happens if this dieting happens. fact15: The fact that notthis inflection but that saprobicness happens is wrong.

fact1: ¬(¬{A} & ¬{B}) -> {C} fact2: {HB} fact3: ¬{B} -> (¬{C} & ¬{A}) fact4: ¬{DC} fact5: {D} -> (¬{C} & ¬{B}) fact6: ¬{ER} fact7: ¬{B} -> (¬{A} & ¬{G}) fact8: (¬{I} & ¬{JB}) fact9: ¬({A} & ¬{B}) fact10: ¬{FD} fact11: ¬{G} -> ({F} & {E}) fact12: ¬(¬{CG} & ¬{GB}) fact13: {GO} fact14: {E} -> (¬{D} & ¬{B}) fact15: ¬(¬{A} & {B})

This kind does not happens.

¬{G}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If the fact that this inflection does not occurs and that saprobicness does not occurs does not hold then the uncutness happens. fact2: This tribalization happens. fact3: That that saprobicness does not happens causes that the uncutness does not happens and this inflection does not happens. fact4: That the leptosporangiateness does not happens hold. fact5: The fact that this non-uncutness and this non-saprobicness occurs hold if that risking glee happens. fact6: The Chin does not happens. fact7: This inflection does not occurs and this kind does not occurs if that saprobicness does not happens. fact8: This non-philosophicness and this non-passableness happens. fact9: The fact that this inflection occurs but that saprobicness does not occurs is not true. fact10: That academic does not happens. fact11: That this kind does not occurs causes that this barographicness and this dieting happens. fact12: The fact that that transacting Proxima does not happens and the committal does not happens is incorrect. fact13: The skinned occurs. fact14: That risking glee does not occurs and that saprobicness does not happens if this dieting happens. fact15: The fact that notthis inflection but that saprobicness happens is wrong. ; $hypothesis$ = The uncutness happens. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That yeller is not a salting.

¬{C}{a}

fact1: If that yeller is not a salting the fact that that yeller does not overrun Lombardy and is unfeathered is wrong. fact2: If somebody telegraphs it invests pogey. fact3: The fact that some person is not a ennead but this one is a salting is not correct if this one is not a informercial. fact4: That yeller is not a kind of a ennead. fact5: That yeller is bacteroidal if that yeller is stomatous. fact6: If that yeller is not a ennead the fact that it is a kind of non-xeric a epilog does not hold. fact7: The fact that that yeller is xeric and that thing is a epilog is not true. fact8: This disposable is not a informercial. fact9: Some man is a salting if it is a informercial. fact10: If that something is not xeric but this thing is a kind of a epilog is false this thing is a informercial. fact11: If the fact that somebody is not a ennead and is a salting does not hold it is not a salting. fact12: If something is not non-cervical it storms rubel. fact13: That yeller is a kind of a epizoan.

fact1: ¬{C}{a} -> ¬(¬{BI}{a} & {EJ}{a}) fact2: (x): {ER}x -> {GM}x fact3: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & {C}x) fact4: ¬{A}{a} fact5: {II}{a} -> {FQ}{a} fact6: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact7: ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact8: ¬{B}{ac} fact9: (x): {B}x -> {C}x fact10: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x fact11: (x): ¬(¬{A}x & {C}x) -> ¬{C}x fact12: (x): {DL}x -> {HJ}x fact13: {I}{a}

That yeller is not a salting.

¬{C}{a}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that yeller is not a salting the fact that that yeller does not overrun Lombardy and is unfeathered is wrong. fact2: If somebody telegraphs it invests pogey. fact3: The fact that some person is not a ennead but this one is a salting is not correct if this one is not a informercial. fact4: That yeller is not a kind of a ennead. fact5: That yeller is bacteroidal if that yeller is stomatous. fact6: If that yeller is not a ennead the fact that it is a kind of non-xeric a epilog does not hold. fact7: The fact that that yeller is xeric and that thing is a epilog is not true. fact8: This disposable is not a informercial. fact9: Some man is a salting if it is a informercial. fact10: If that something is not xeric but this thing is a kind of a epilog is false this thing is a informercial. fact11: If the fact that somebody is not a ennead and is a salting does not hold it is not a salting. fact12: If something is not non-cervical it storms rubel. fact13: That yeller is a kind of a epizoan. ; $hypothesis$ = That yeller is not a salting. ; $proof$ =

fact6 & fact4 -> int1: The fact that that yeller is non-xeric a epilog does not hold.; fact10 -> int2: If the fact that that yeller is not xeric but a epilog does not hold the fact that it is a informercial is right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That yeller is a informercial.; fact9 -> int4: If that yeller is a informercial then it is a salting.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That cochin is a kind of a musing.

{C}{a}

fact1: That juryman is both not a Pandanales and not a musing. fact2: That tarantula is not a Morrison and not absorptive. fact3: That cochin is a loginess. fact4: That cochin is not absorptive. fact5: That cochin does band Linnaea. fact6: The fact that the fact that some man does not band Linnaea and is absorptive is correct does not hold if this one brays. fact7: If something is absorptive it is not a musing. fact8: If the fact that that cytomegalovirus is non-absorptive one that is not unseaworthy does not hold then the person does not deluge ICC. fact9: That cochin is not a Mafa if the fact that it does not italicize Pasch and it does not band Linnaea is false. fact10: Something brays if the fact that it is a geodesic is right. fact11: The brittlebush bands Linnaea. fact12: The boozer is not absorptive. fact13: That tarantula is not absorptive. fact14: The fact that that cochin does not band Linnaea but he/she is absorptive is not right. fact15: That cochin is not a comportment. fact16: That that cochin is both not a musing and not a Adar does not hold. fact17: If that cochin is absorptive that cochin is not a musing. fact18: That that cochin is not leafless and that thing is not absorptive does not hold. fact19: this Linnaea does band cochin.

fact1: (¬{HC}{ci} & ¬{C}{ci}) fact2: (¬{EP}{cd} & ¬{B}{cd}) fact3: {FH}{a} fact4: ¬{B}{a} fact5: {A}{a} fact6: (x): {D}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & {B}x) fact7: (x): {B}x -> ¬{C}x fact8: ¬(¬{B}{id} & ¬{FT}{id}) -> ¬{EO}{id} fact9: ¬(¬{IM}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) -> ¬{FA}{a} fact10: (x): {E}x -> {D}x fact11: {A}{jj} fact12: ¬{B}{hf} fact13: ¬{B}{cd} fact14: ¬(¬{A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact15: ¬{GQ}{a} fact16: ¬(¬{C}{a} & ¬{HI}{a}) fact17: {B}{a} -> ¬{C}{a} fact18: ¬(¬{HM}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) fact19: {AB}{ab}

That cochin is a kind of a musing.

{C}{a}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That juryman is both not a Pandanales and not a musing. fact2: That tarantula is not a Morrison and not absorptive. fact3: That cochin is a loginess. fact4: That cochin is not absorptive. fact5: That cochin does band Linnaea. fact6: The fact that the fact that some man does not band Linnaea and is absorptive is correct does not hold if this one brays. fact7: If something is absorptive it is not a musing. fact8: If the fact that that cytomegalovirus is non-absorptive one that is not unseaworthy does not hold then the person does not deluge ICC. fact9: That cochin is not a Mafa if the fact that it does not italicize Pasch and it does not band Linnaea is false. fact10: Something brays if the fact that it is a geodesic is right. fact11: The brittlebush bands Linnaea. fact12: The boozer is not absorptive. fact13: That tarantula is not absorptive. fact14: The fact that that cochin does not band Linnaea but he/she is absorptive is not right. fact15: That cochin is not a comportment. fact16: That that cochin is both not a musing and not a Adar does not hold. fact17: If that cochin is absorptive that cochin is not a musing. fact18: That that cochin is not leafless and that thing is not absorptive does not hold. fact19: this Linnaea does band cochin. ; $hypothesis$ = That cochin is a kind of a musing. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

Both this daydream and that debauched happens.

({AA} & {AB})

fact1: If that powering Georgetown does not happens then that that this daydream and that debauched happens is wrong is correct. fact2: If that earliness does not occurs then the fact that both that powering Georgetown and that debauched occurs is true. fact3: That powering Georgetown does not occurs. fact4: That earliness does not happens if the fact that this invidia and that cranking occurs is wrong. fact5: That hypophysealness leads to that this liquidity does not occurs and that conduction does not occurs. fact6: If the fact that that cranking does not happens is correct then that debauched occurs and that powering Georgetown happens. fact7: The fact that this forensics occurs and this remediableness happens is false. fact8: If that sensualising arles does not occurs then that this invidia does not happens and/or that asphyxiating Antioch does not happens does not hold. fact9: That earliness occurs if the fact that this invidia does not occurs and/or that asphyxiating Antioch does not occurs does not hold. fact10: Notthis ninjutsu but this issuing happens if this irrigating Paradisaeidae does not occurs. fact11: If that atacticness does not occurs then that both the burbling and the rectification happens does not hold. fact12: That notthe forecasting chartered but this paradigmaticness happens is triggered by that that netball does not happens. fact13: This irrigating Paradisaeidae does not occurs. fact14: This unascribableness and that adenoidectomy occurs if that asphyxiating Antioch does not occurs. fact15: If that this ninjutsu does not happens is true then that sensualising arles does not occurs and this ecdemicness does not happens. fact16: That notthe forecasting chartered but this paradigmaticness occurs brings about that that cranking does not happens. fact17: This daydream happens if that adenoidectomy occurs. fact18: This unascribableness occurs if that earliness happens. fact19: This noninstitutionalizedness does not happens. fact20: If this liquidity does not occurs then this mischievousness does not happens and/or that interment does not occurs. fact21: If this unascribableness happens that adenoidectomy occurs. fact22: If either this mischievousness does not happens or that interment does not occurs or both then that netball does not occurs.

fact1: ¬{A} -> ¬({AA} & {AB}) fact2: ¬{D} -> ({A} & {AB}) fact3: ¬{A} fact4: ¬({F} & {E}) -> ¬{D} fact5: {P} -> (¬{N} & ¬{O}) fact6: ¬{E} -> ({AB} & {A}) fact7: ¬({BI} & {AD}) fact8: ¬{J} -> ¬(¬{F} v ¬{G}) fact9: ¬(¬{F} v ¬{G}) -> {D} fact10: ¬{T} -> (¬{R} & {S}) fact11: ¬{HH} -> ¬({CB} & {FL}) fact12: ¬{K} -> (¬{I} & {H}) fact13: ¬{T} fact14: ¬{G} -> ({C} & {B}) fact15: ¬{R} -> (¬{J} & ¬{Q}) fact16: (¬{I} & {H}) -> ¬{E} fact17: {B} -> {AA} fact18: {D} -> {C} fact19: ¬{U} fact20: ¬{N} -> (¬{L} v ¬{M}) fact21: {C} -> {B} fact22: (¬{L} v ¬{M}) -> ¬{K}

Both this daydream and that debauched happens.

({AA} & {AB})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that powering Georgetown does not happens then that that this daydream and that debauched happens is wrong is correct. fact2: If that earliness does not occurs then the fact that both that powering Georgetown and that debauched occurs is true. fact3: That powering Georgetown does not occurs. fact4: That earliness does not happens if the fact that this invidia and that cranking occurs is wrong. fact5: That hypophysealness leads to that this liquidity does not occurs and that conduction does not occurs. fact6: If the fact that that cranking does not happens is correct then that debauched occurs and that powering Georgetown happens. fact7: The fact that this forensics occurs and this remediableness happens is false. fact8: If that sensualising arles does not occurs then that this invidia does not happens and/or that asphyxiating Antioch does not happens does not hold. fact9: That earliness occurs if the fact that this invidia does not occurs and/or that asphyxiating Antioch does not occurs does not hold. fact10: Notthis ninjutsu but this issuing happens if this irrigating Paradisaeidae does not occurs. fact11: If that atacticness does not occurs then that both the burbling and the rectification happens does not hold. fact12: That notthe forecasting chartered but this paradigmaticness happens is triggered by that that netball does not happens. fact13: This irrigating Paradisaeidae does not occurs. fact14: This unascribableness and that adenoidectomy occurs if that asphyxiating Antioch does not occurs. fact15: If that this ninjutsu does not happens is true then that sensualising arles does not occurs and this ecdemicness does not happens. fact16: That notthe forecasting chartered but this paradigmaticness occurs brings about that that cranking does not happens. fact17: This daydream happens if that adenoidectomy occurs. fact18: This unascribableness occurs if that earliness happens. fact19: This noninstitutionalizedness does not happens. fact20: If this liquidity does not occurs then this mischievousness does not happens and/or that interment does not occurs. fact21: If this unascribableness happens that adenoidectomy occurs. fact22: If either this mischievousness does not happens or that interment does not occurs or both then that netball does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = Both this daydream and that debauched happens. ; $proof$ =

fact1 & fact3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That the fact that this capturing malady prevents that that brouhaha does not occurs is right does not hold.

¬({A} -> {B})

fact1: The fact that the dint does not occurs and the disclaimer does not happens is incorrect if this scandal happens. fact2: That this picturing occurs prevents that that brouhaha does not occurs. fact3: That this fistfighting but notthe recessional occurs does not hold. fact4: That this picturing does not occurs and that unsexedness does not happens is incorrect if this capturing malady occurs. fact5: The fact that this reformulating prejudgement does not happens and this catarrhineness does not occurs is not true if this lobatedness occurs. fact6: That the Avestanness occurs but the breeding dryad does not happens is false. fact7: The fact that this actuation occurs but this catarrhineness does not occurs is false. fact8: The fact that this lobatedness but notthe accounting Cryptobranchidae happens is incorrect if the sleeping occurs. fact9: That if this swinging determinism happens then that the superlunarness does not occurs and that excruciation does not happens is not correct is right. fact10: The step happens if the fact that this veiling does not occurs and this congestiveness does not happens is false. fact11: This clerking occurs if that the correction does not happens and that elongation does not happens does not hold. fact12: If that the differentialness does not occurs and that jehad does not occurs is not right then this decompression happens. fact13: If the clocking doppelzentner occurs the fact that the barratry but notthe gaming Holmes happens is incorrect. fact14: That brouhaha occurs if the fact that this picturing does not occurs and that unsexedness does not happens is false. fact15: This remilitarization occurs if this dropping happens. fact16: That the effacing wildness does not occurs and this missing Bristol occurs does not hold. fact17: That both this picturing and this non-unsexedness occurs is false. fact18: That that entomophilousness happens yields the garlickiness. fact19: If the overfatiguing happens that this stab occurs but the listing Corsica does not happens does not hold. fact20: That both this picturing and this non-unsexedness occurs is false if this capturing malady occurs. fact21: The fact that that Chaos but notthe disavowal occurs is incorrect. fact22: If the fact that that Bath happens hold that the vesper does not occurs and the vasoconstriction does not happens does not hold.

fact1: {BS} -> ¬(¬{BN} & ¬{DH}) fact2: {AA} -> {B} fact3: ¬({II} & ¬{CB}) fact4: {A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) fact5: {IE} -> ¬(¬{FD} & ¬{DU}) fact6: ¬({FQ} & ¬{HM}) fact7: ¬({E} & ¬{DU}) fact8: {FE} -> ¬({IE} & ¬{AC}) fact9: {GQ} -> ¬(¬{HB} & ¬{HJ}) fact10: ¬(¬{O} & ¬{JB}) -> {GI} fact11: ¬(¬{BT} & ¬{GO}) -> {BQ} fact12: ¬(¬{FH} & ¬{IO}) -> {GH} fact13: {DB} -> ¬({CU} & ¬{FS}) fact14: ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) -> {B} fact15: {DT} -> {C} fact16: ¬(¬{BM} & {AJ}) fact17: ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) fact18: {EB} -> {ER} fact19: {GF} -> ¬({IL} & ¬{JE}) fact20: {A} -> ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) fact21: ¬({IR} & ¬{D}) fact22: {EN} -> ¬(¬{I} & ¬{IM})

DISPROVED

DISPROVED

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that the dint does not occurs and the disclaimer does not happens is incorrect if this scandal happens. fact2: That this picturing occurs prevents that that brouhaha does not occurs. fact3: That this fistfighting but notthe recessional occurs does not hold. fact4: That this picturing does not occurs and that unsexedness does not happens is incorrect if this capturing malady occurs. fact5: The fact that this reformulating prejudgement does not happens and this catarrhineness does not occurs is not true if this lobatedness occurs. fact6: That the Avestanness occurs but the breeding dryad does not happens is false. fact7: The fact that this actuation occurs but this catarrhineness does not occurs is false. fact8: The fact that this lobatedness but notthe accounting Cryptobranchidae happens is incorrect if the sleeping occurs. fact9: That if this swinging determinism happens then that the superlunarness does not occurs and that excruciation does not happens is not correct is right. fact10: The step happens if the fact that this veiling does not occurs and this congestiveness does not happens is false. fact11: This clerking occurs if that the correction does not happens and that elongation does not happens does not hold. fact12: If that the differentialness does not occurs and that jehad does not occurs is not right then this decompression happens. fact13: If the clocking doppelzentner occurs the fact that the barratry but notthe gaming Holmes happens is incorrect. fact14: That brouhaha occurs if the fact that this picturing does not occurs and that unsexedness does not happens is false. fact15: This remilitarization occurs if this dropping happens. fact16: That the effacing wildness does not occurs and this missing Bristol occurs does not hold. fact17: That both this picturing and this non-unsexedness occurs is false. fact18: That that entomophilousness happens yields the garlickiness. fact19: If the overfatiguing happens that this stab occurs but the listing Corsica does not happens does not hold. fact20: That both this picturing and this non-unsexedness occurs is false if this capturing malady occurs. fact21: The fact that that Chaos but notthe disavowal occurs is incorrect. fact22: If the fact that that Bath happens hold that the vesper does not occurs and the vasoconstriction does not happens does not hold. ; $hypothesis$ = That the fact that this capturing malady prevents that that brouhaha does not occurs is right does not hold. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that this capturing malady happens.; fact4 & assump1 -> int1: The fact that this picturing does not happens and that unsexedness does not happens does not hold.; int1 & fact14 -> int2: That brouhaha occurs.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

Marian is not reportable.

¬{A}{a}

fact1: Zack does not transpirate Avicenniaceae. fact2: If something is not infallible and transpirates Avicenniaceae then it is not a broken. fact3: If something that is fallible is not unreportable then it is not a kind of a broken. fact4: If somebody that is fallible does not transpirate Avicenniaceae then he/she is not a broken. fact5: That some person is not a Samarcand and is not a kind of a broken is correct if that one is reportable. fact6: That that aldehyde does not overleap Rhodesia hold. fact7: The octopod does not transpirate Avicenniaceae. fact8: Marian does not transpirate Avicenniaceae. fact9: Zack is not a broken if she is fallible and she transpirates Avicenniaceae. fact10: That Marian is not reportable is true if Zack is not a broken. fact11: That aldehyde is a kind of a broken if that aldehyde overleaps Rhodesia and/or this does not wallop. fact12: That aldehyde overleaps Rhodesia and/or does not wallop if that aldehyde does not Cook gonorrhea.

fact1: ¬{AB}{aa} fact2: (x): ({AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x fact3: (x): ({AA}x & {A}x) -> ¬{B}x fact4: (x): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x fact5: (x): {A}x -> (¬{C}x & ¬{B}x) fact6: ¬{E}{b} fact7: ¬{AB}{dt} fact8: ¬{AB}{a} fact9: ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} fact10: ¬{B}{aa} -> ¬{A}{a} fact11: ({E}{b} v ¬{D}{b}) -> {B}{b} fact12: ¬{F}{b} -> ({E}{b} v ¬{D}{b})

The sowbelly is not a kind of a broken.

¬{B}{da}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Zack does not transpirate Avicenniaceae. fact2: If something is not infallible and transpirates Avicenniaceae then it is not a broken. fact3: If something that is fallible is not unreportable then it is not a kind of a broken. fact4: If somebody that is fallible does not transpirate Avicenniaceae then he/she is not a broken. fact5: That some person is not a Samarcand and is not a kind of a broken is correct if that one is reportable. fact6: That that aldehyde does not overleap Rhodesia hold. fact7: The octopod does not transpirate Avicenniaceae. fact8: Marian does not transpirate Avicenniaceae. fact9: Zack is not a broken if she is fallible and she transpirates Avicenniaceae. fact10: That Marian is not reportable is true if Zack is not a broken. fact11: That aldehyde is a kind of a broken if that aldehyde overleaps Rhodesia and/or this does not wallop. fact12: That aldehyde overleaps Rhodesia and/or does not wallop if that aldehyde does not Cook gonorrhea. ; $hypothesis$ = Marian is not reportable. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This fucking is hydrometric thing that is non-ovine.

({C}{c} & ¬{D}{c})

fact1: That this fucking is not non-hydrometric hold if this waterspout is tartaric. fact2: That Aristocort is a kind of a Rumania but it is not a kind of a privacy. fact3: If that this waterspout either is not hydrometric or is not a privacy or both is wrong this museum is not hydrometric. fact4: This fucking is not a Gorkiy. fact5: That if this museum is a kind of a privacy then this waterspout is tartaric hold. fact6: Something that is a kind of a privacy is a kind of a friendly that does not present seniority. fact7: If this fucking is not a Gorkiy then this waterspout is a Norge and is not a pauperism. fact8: This fucking is a privacy but it is not ovine if this museum is hydrometric. fact9: That acetamide is not allylic. fact10: Some person is not a pauperism if it is not allylic. fact11: This fucking is hydrometric. fact12: If that that crybaby is not a Guatemalan hold then this diapsid is non-tartaric and it is not intentional. fact13: If some person is intentional then it is not non-ovine. fact14: If this waterspout is tartaric this fucking is hydrometric but not ovine. fact15: If the fact that some man is not Romanic and is plural does not hold then that person is not plural. fact16: That this waterspout is not Romanic but it is plural is wrong. fact17: This museum is intentional if this waterspout is not a kind of a pauperism and is a kind of a Guatemalan. fact18: That crybaby is not a Guatemalan if that acetamide is not a pauperism. fact19: This waterspout is a Guatemalan and this one is allylic if this one is not plural. fact20: If that this museum is both non-hydrometric and tartaric is false then this Nesselrode is a privacy. fact21: The fact that something is not hydrometric but that is tartaric is not true if that is ovine.

fact1: {B}{b} -> {C}{c} fact2: ({AC}{fu} & ¬{A}{fu}) fact3: ¬(¬{C}{b} v ¬{A}{b}) -> ¬{C}{a} fact4: ¬{K}{c} fact5: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} fact6: (x): {A}x -> ({DI}x & ¬{FI}x) fact7: ¬{K}{c} -> ({J}{b} & ¬{G}{b}) fact8: {C}{a} -> ({A}{c} & ¬{D}{c}) fact9: ¬{H}{f} fact10: (x): ¬{H}x -> ¬{G}x fact11: {C}{c} fact12: ¬{F}{e} -> (¬{B}{d} & ¬{E}{d}) fact13: (x): {E}x -> {D}x fact14: {B}{b} -> ({C}{c} & ¬{D}{c}) fact15: (x): ¬(¬{L}x & {I}x) -> ¬{I}x fact16: ¬(¬{L}{b} & {I}{b}) fact17: (¬{G}{b} & {F}{b}) -> {E}{a} fact18: ¬{G}{f} -> ¬{F}{e} fact19: ¬{I}{b} -> ({F}{b} & {H}{b}) fact20: ¬(¬{C}{a} & {B}{a}) -> {A}{ia} fact21: (x): {D}x -> ¬(¬{C}x & {B}x)

This Nesselrode is a friendly but that does not present seniority.

({DI}{ia} & ¬{FI}{ia})

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: That this fucking is not non-hydrometric hold if this waterspout is tartaric. fact2: That Aristocort is a kind of a Rumania but it is not a kind of a privacy. fact3: If that this waterspout either is not hydrometric or is not a privacy or both is wrong this museum is not hydrometric. fact4: This fucking is not a Gorkiy. fact5: That if this museum is a kind of a privacy then this waterspout is tartaric hold. fact6: Something that is a kind of a privacy is a kind of a friendly that does not present seniority. fact7: If this fucking is not a Gorkiy then this waterspout is a Norge and is not a pauperism. fact8: This fucking is a privacy but it is not ovine if this museum is hydrometric. fact9: That acetamide is not allylic. fact10: Some person is not a pauperism if it is not allylic. fact11: This fucking is hydrometric. fact12: If that that crybaby is not a Guatemalan hold then this diapsid is non-tartaric and it is not intentional. fact13: If some person is intentional then it is not non-ovine. fact14: If this waterspout is tartaric this fucking is hydrometric but not ovine. fact15: If the fact that some man is not Romanic and is plural does not hold then that person is not plural. fact16: That this waterspout is not Romanic but it is plural is wrong. fact17: This museum is intentional if this waterspout is not a kind of a pauperism and is a kind of a Guatemalan. fact18: That crybaby is not a Guatemalan if that acetamide is not a pauperism. fact19: This waterspout is a Guatemalan and this one is allylic if this one is not plural. fact20: If that this museum is both non-hydrometric and tartaric is false then this Nesselrode is a privacy. fact21: The fact that something is not hydrometric but that is tartaric is not true if that is ovine. ; $hypothesis$ = This fucking is hydrometric thing that is non-ovine. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This neutral is an astronautics.

{D}{b}

fact1: The fact that this neutral is a Zygomycota hold. fact2: Something is not a Zygomycota if it twinges and junketings. fact3: The fact that that enclave twinges hold. fact4: This cocklebur junketings. fact5: If that enclave is not a Zygomycota this neutral is a kind of an astronautics. fact6: If someone is a Zygomycota and junketings then it is not an astronautics. fact7: That enclave junketings. fact8: That enclave does not junketing if that progeny does not junketing and does not inundate Tenrecidae. fact9: The Nuprin junketings. fact10: If that enclave does not junketing that this neutral is an astronautics and it twinges is wrong. fact11: Something that junketings and is a Zygomycota is not an astronautics. fact12: This neutral is not a Bokkos. fact13: If Adam is not a Zygomycota that progeny does not junketing and does not inundate Tenrecidae. fact14: If a Zygomycota is an astronautics then she/he does not junketing. fact15: If that that some person is an astronautics that twinges is right is incorrect then she/he is not an astronautics.

fact1: {C}{b} fact2: (x): ({A}x & {B}x) -> ¬{C}x fact3: {A}{a} fact4: {B}{k} fact5: ¬{C}{a} -> {D}{b} fact6: (x): ({C}x & {B}x) -> ¬{D}x fact7: {B}{a} fact8: (¬{B}{c} & ¬{E}{c}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact9: {B}{bu} fact10: ¬{B}{a} -> ¬({D}{b} & {A}{b}) fact11: (x): ({B}x & {C}x) -> ¬{D}x fact12: ¬{BK}{b} fact13: ¬{C}{d} -> (¬{B}{c} & ¬{E}{c}) fact14: (x): ({C}x & {D}x) -> ¬{B}x fact15: (x): ¬({D}x & {A}x) -> ¬{D}x

This neutral is not an astronautics.

¬{D}{b}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that this neutral is a Zygomycota hold. fact2: Something is not a Zygomycota if it twinges and junketings. fact3: The fact that that enclave twinges hold. fact4: This cocklebur junketings. fact5: If that enclave is not a Zygomycota this neutral is a kind of an astronautics. fact6: If someone is a Zygomycota and junketings then it is not an astronautics. fact7: That enclave junketings. fact8: That enclave does not junketing if that progeny does not junketing and does not inundate Tenrecidae. fact9: The Nuprin junketings. fact10: If that enclave does not junketing that this neutral is an astronautics and it twinges is wrong. fact11: Something that junketings and is a Zygomycota is not an astronautics. fact12: This neutral is not a Bokkos. fact13: If Adam is not a Zygomycota that progeny does not junketing and does not inundate Tenrecidae. fact14: If a Zygomycota is an astronautics then she/he does not junketing. fact15: If that that some person is an astronautics that twinges is right is incorrect then she/he is not an astronautics. ; $hypothesis$ = This neutral is an astronautics. ; $proof$ =

fact3 & fact7 -> int1: That enclave twinges and junketings.; fact2 -> int2: That enclave is not a Zygomycota if that enclave twinges and it does junketing.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That enclave is not a Zygomycota.; int3 & fact5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This conveying Sceloglaux happens.

{B}

fact1: This blowback happens if that lithomanticness does not happens. fact2: That lithomanticness happens. fact3: That non-lithomanticness is brought about by that this conveying Sceloglaux does not occurs and that hypognathousness does not happens. fact4: If that hypognathousness occurs this conveying Sceloglaux does not occurs and that lithomanticness occurs. fact5: If that lithomanticness happens then this conveying Sceloglaux occurs.

fact1: ¬{A} -> {DD} fact2: {A} fact3: (¬{B} & ¬{C}) -> ¬{A} fact4: {C} -> (¬{B} & {A}) fact5: {A} -> {B}

This blowback occurs.

{DD}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This blowback happens if that lithomanticness does not happens. fact2: That lithomanticness happens. fact3: That non-lithomanticness is brought about by that this conveying Sceloglaux does not occurs and that hypognathousness does not happens. fact4: If that hypognathousness occurs this conveying Sceloglaux does not occurs and that lithomanticness occurs. fact5: If that lithomanticness happens then this conveying Sceloglaux occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = This conveying Sceloglaux happens. ; $proof$ =

fact5 & fact2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

The fact that there exists something such that that thing is not a smallpox and that thing is faucal is incorrect.

¬((Ex): (¬{D}x & {C}x))

fact1: There is some man such that that one is not a kind of a smallpox. fact2: That hassock is faucal if Hilario is continuous. fact3: Something is not a smallpox and is faucal if it is faucal. fact4: Hilario either chops taradiddle or is continuous or both. fact5: If that Hilario does chop taradiddle hold that that hassock is faucal is true. fact6: Hilario is not continuous but it is a smallpox if Hilario is a smallpox.

fact1: (Ex): ¬{D}x fact2: {B}{a} -> {C}{c} fact3: (x): {C}x -> (¬{D}x & {C}x) fact4: ({A}{a} v {B}{a}) fact5: {A}{a} -> {C}{c} fact6: {D}{a} -> (¬{B}{a} & {D}{a})

DISPROVED

DISPROVED

$facts$ = fact1: There is some man such that that one is not a kind of a smallpox. fact2: That hassock is faucal if Hilario is continuous. fact3: Something is not a smallpox and is faucal if it is faucal. fact4: Hilario either chops taradiddle or is continuous or both. fact5: If that Hilario does chop taradiddle hold that that hassock is faucal is true. fact6: Hilario is not continuous but it is a smallpox if Hilario is a smallpox. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that there exists something such that that thing is not a smallpox and that thing is faucal is incorrect. ; $proof$ =

fact4 & fact5 & fact2 -> int1: That hassock is faucal.; fact3 -> int2: That hassock is not a smallpox but faucal if that hassock is faucal.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That hassock is not a smallpox but faucal.; int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

Let's assume that this auroralness occurs.

{A}

fact1: If the fact that this efferentness occurs but this grieving liability does not occurs does not hold that Merovingian does not occurs. fact2: The sympathomimeticness does not happens. fact3: That that checkering MRD occurs and that counterattacking happens is triggered by that this endozoanness does not occurs. fact4: If this prisonbreak does not happens notthat redundancy but this astringing bungled happens. fact5: This prisonbreak does not happens if the fact that this unambiguousness occurs but that climaxing does not occurs does not hold. fact6: This sinewiness does not occurs and this tackle does not happens if this charge occurs. fact7: That this efferentness occurs and this grieving liability does not occurs is false if this interbreeding occurs. fact8: The fact that this interbreeding occurs is true if this doubting fewness happens. fact9: If the sympathomimeticness does not occurs then this perseverating Cladorhyncus does not happens. fact10: This endozoanness does not occurs if this sinewiness does not happens. fact11: If this lookout does not occurs this doubting fewness or the mutativeness or both occurs. fact12: That this perseverating Cladorhyncus does not occurs leads to that this androgenousness but notthis lookout occurs. fact13: That this unambiguousness but notthat climaxing occurs does not hold if that counterattacking happens. fact14: That valued does not occurs. fact15: If that redundancy does not occurs then that valued and this auroralness happens. fact16: That this charge happens and the demonstrating Alectoris does not occurs is caused by that that Merovingian does not occurs.

fact1: ¬({Q} & ¬{P}) -> ¬{O} fact2: ¬{AC} fact3: ¬{J} -> ({I} & {H}) fact4: ¬{E} -> (¬{C} & {D}) fact5: ¬({G} & ¬{F}) -> ¬{E} fact6: {M} -> (¬{K} & ¬{L}) fact7: {R} -> ¬({Q} & ¬{P}) fact8: {T} -> {R} fact9: ¬{AC} -> ¬{AB} fact10: ¬{K} -> ¬{J} fact11: ¬{U} -> ({T} v {S}) fact12: ¬{AB} -> ({AA} & ¬{U}) fact13: {H} -> ¬({G} & ¬{F}) fact14: ¬{B} fact15: ¬{C} -> ({B} & {A}) fact16: ¬{O} -> ({M} & ¬{N})

Let's assume that this auroralness occurs.

{A}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If the fact that this efferentness occurs but this grieving liability does not occurs does not hold that Merovingian does not occurs. fact2: The sympathomimeticness does not happens. fact3: That that checkering MRD occurs and that counterattacking happens is triggered by that this endozoanness does not occurs. fact4: If this prisonbreak does not happens notthat redundancy but this astringing bungled happens. fact5: This prisonbreak does not happens if the fact that this unambiguousness occurs but that climaxing does not occurs does not hold. fact6: This sinewiness does not occurs and this tackle does not happens if this charge occurs. fact7: That this efferentness occurs and this grieving liability does not occurs is false if this interbreeding occurs. fact8: The fact that this interbreeding occurs is true if this doubting fewness happens. fact9: If the sympathomimeticness does not occurs then this perseverating Cladorhyncus does not happens. fact10: This endozoanness does not occurs if this sinewiness does not happens. fact11: If this lookout does not occurs this doubting fewness or the mutativeness or both occurs. fact12: That this perseverating Cladorhyncus does not occurs leads to that this androgenousness but notthis lookout occurs. fact13: That this unambiguousness but notthat climaxing occurs does not hold if that counterattacking happens. fact14: That valued does not occurs. fact15: If that redundancy does not occurs then that valued and this auroralness happens. fact16: That this charge happens and the demonstrating Alectoris does not occurs is caused by that that Merovingian does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = Let's assume that this auroralness occurs. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This maiger is sectarian.

{B}{b}

fact1: If this gastrolobium is not lentic this maiger is not sectarian. fact2: The fact that this gastrolobium is not non-aeonian hold if that that succotash misrepresents and/or this does not debone Polyporaceae does not hold. fact3: This spearmint does not vacillate if that that gravure does not pilot Bering and vacillate is false. fact4: If that this gastrolobium is not lentic but it is sectarian is false this maiger is not a Shia. fact5: If this spearmint does not vacillate and is not intradermal that succotash does not vacillate. fact6: This maiger is sectarian if this gastrolobium is aeonian. fact7: The fact that something does not pilot Bering and does vacillate is incorrect if this thing does lobby prematurity. fact8: The fact that somebody does misrepresent or does not debone Polyporaceae or both does not hold if this person does not vacillate. fact9: If that this gastrolobium is non-sectarian one that is lentic does not hold then this maiger is not a Shia. fact10: That gravure lobbies prematurity. fact11: This maiger is not lentic if that this gastrolobium is not sectarian but a Shia is false. fact12: If the fact that this gastrolobium is not a kind of a Shia but he is lentic is not right then this maiger is not sectarian.

fact1: ¬{AB}{a} -> ¬{B}{b} fact2: ¬({D}{c} v ¬{C}{c}) -> {A}{a} fact3: ¬(¬{F}{e} & {E}{e}) -> ¬{E}{d} fact4: ¬(¬{AB}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{AA}{b} fact5: (¬{E}{d} & ¬{G}{d}) -> ¬{E}{c} fact6: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} fact7: (x): {I}x -> ¬(¬{F}x & {E}x) fact8: (x): ¬{E}x -> ¬({D}x v ¬{C}x) fact9: ¬(¬{B}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{AA}{b} fact10: {I}{e} fact11: ¬(¬{B}{a} & {AA}{a}) -> ¬{AB}{b} fact12: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b}

This maiger is sectarian.

{B}{b}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this gastrolobium is not lentic this maiger is not sectarian. fact2: The fact that this gastrolobium is not non-aeonian hold if that that succotash misrepresents and/or this does not debone Polyporaceae does not hold. fact3: This spearmint does not vacillate if that that gravure does not pilot Bering and vacillate is false. fact4: If that this gastrolobium is not lentic but it is sectarian is false this maiger is not a Shia. fact5: If this spearmint does not vacillate and is not intradermal that succotash does not vacillate. fact6: This maiger is sectarian if this gastrolobium is aeonian. fact7: The fact that something does not pilot Bering and does vacillate is incorrect if this thing does lobby prematurity. fact8: The fact that somebody does misrepresent or does not debone Polyporaceae or both does not hold if this person does not vacillate. fact9: If that this gastrolobium is non-sectarian one that is lentic does not hold then this maiger is not a Shia. fact10: That gravure lobbies prematurity. fact11: This maiger is not lentic if that this gastrolobium is not sectarian but a Shia is false. fact12: If the fact that this gastrolobium is not a kind of a Shia but he is lentic is not right then this maiger is not sectarian. ; $hypothesis$ = This maiger is sectarian. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

Both this non-Aeolianness and that pureness happens.

(¬{AA} & {AB})

fact1: That that uproar but notthat ignition occurs brings about that that gumming schooldays does not occurs. fact2: That fatiguing feminine does not occurs but the reinterpretation happens. fact3: If the fact that that ignition and that gumming schooldays happens is false then that gumming schooldays does not happens. fact4: If that pureness does not occurs that ignition does not occurs. fact5: If that uproar does not happens then the fact that both that ignition and that gumming schooldays happens is incorrect. fact6: If that gumming schooldays does not occurs the wing does not occurs but this earliness occurs. fact7: That that uproar does not occurs is brought about by that that racing does not happens and/or that that illumining Lipchitz does not occurs. fact8: If this tucking efficaciousness happens then that drumming biosystematics does not occurs and that exploding Norrish happens. fact9: That pureness happens. fact10: That gumming schooldays does not occurs. fact11: If that drumming biosystematics does not happens then either that racing does not happens or that illumining Lipchitz does not happens or both. fact12: That gumming schooldays does not occurs and that ignition occurs. fact13: The fact that notthe untuning Nietzsche but the felteding Zygophyllum happens is not right. fact14: This tucking efficaciousness happens and that Dionysianness happens if this disembowelment does not happens.

fact1: ({C} & ¬{B}) -> ¬{A} fact2: (¬{DN} & {HH}) fact3: ¬({B} & {A}) -> ¬{A} fact4: ¬{AB} -> ¬{B} fact5: ¬{C} -> ¬({B} & {A}) fact6: ¬{A} -> (¬{IS} & {CD}) fact7: (¬{E} v ¬{D}) -> ¬{C} fact8: {H} -> (¬{F} & {G}) fact9: {AB} fact10: ¬{A} fact11: ¬{F} -> (¬{E} v ¬{D}) fact12: (¬{A} & {B}) fact13: ¬(¬{HC} & {AJ}) fact14: ¬{J} -> ({H} & {I})

Notthe wing but this earliness occurs.

(¬{IS} & {CD})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That that uproar but notthat ignition occurs brings about that that gumming schooldays does not occurs. fact2: That fatiguing feminine does not occurs but the reinterpretation happens. fact3: If the fact that that ignition and that gumming schooldays happens is false then that gumming schooldays does not happens. fact4: If that pureness does not occurs that ignition does not occurs. fact5: If that uproar does not happens then the fact that both that ignition and that gumming schooldays happens is incorrect. fact6: If that gumming schooldays does not occurs the wing does not occurs but this earliness occurs. fact7: That that uproar does not occurs is brought about by that that racing does not happens and/or that that illumining Lipchitz does not occurs. fact8: If this tucking efficaciousness happens then that drumming biosystematics does not occurs and that exploding Norrish happens. fact9: That pureness happens. fact10: That gumming schooldays does not occurs. fact11: If that drumming biosystematics does not happens then either that racing does not happens or that illumining Lipchitz does not happens or both. fact12: That gumming schooldays does not occurs and that ignition occurs. fact13: The fact that notthe untuning Nietzsche but the felteding Zygophyllum happens is not right. fact14: This tucking efficaciousness happens and that Dionysianness happens if this disembowelment does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = Both this non-Aeolianness and that pureness happens. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This disabling dishonorableness does not occurs.

¬{D}

fact1: If this holisticness happens this altostratus occurs. fact2: That leanerness does not happens if that sublimation does not occurs. fact3: If that leanerness does not occurs then both that bonelessness and this disabling dishonorableness occurs. fact4: This peaking hypercalcinuria happens if this millenary occurs. fact5: This holisticness happens. fact6: If the immobilizing Bayes does not occurs that cicatrising Mysore occurs and that sublimation happens. fact7: The trailing happens. fact8: That sublimation is prevented by that both that cicatrising Mysore and the immobilizing Bayes happens. fact9: The unaddressedness does not occurs and this unidirectionalness happens if the trailing happens. fact10: That leanerness is caused by that that sublimation happens. fact11: That this circularising Bennett happens and this altostratus occurs brings about that this disabling dishonorableness does not happens. fact12: If the non-unaddressedness and this unidirectionalness occurs the fact that the thickening Cocytus does not happens is correct. fact13: The immobilizing Bayes is prevented by that the thickening Cocytus does not occurs and this asymptoticness does not occurs. fact14: That both this hallelujah and that assembling initialisation occurs results in the non-asymptoticness. fact15: This circularising Bennett is caused by that that bonelessness happens. fact16: That cicatrising Mysore occurs.

fact1: {A} -> {B} fact2: ¬{G} -> ¬{F} fact3: ¬{F} -> ({E} & {D}) fact4: {HM} -> {BR} fact5: {A} fact6: ¬{I} -> ({H} & {G}) fact7: {P} fact8: ({H} & {I}) -> ¬{G} fact9: {P} -> (¬{L} & {M}) fact10: {G} -> {F} fact11: ({C} & {B}) -> ¬{D} fact12: (¬{L} & {M}) -> ¬{J} fact13: (¬{J} & ¬{K}) -> ¬{I} fact14: ({N} & {O}) -> ¬{K} fact15: {E} -> {C} fact16: {H}

This disabling dishonorableness happens.

{D}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this holisticness happens this altostratus occurs. fact2: That leanerness does not happens if that sublimation does not occurs. fact3: If that leanerness does not occurs then both that bonelessness and this disabling dishonorableness occurs. fact4: This peaking hypercalcinuria happens if this millenary occurs. fact5: This holisticness happens. fact6: If the immobilizing Bayes does not occurs that cicatrising Mysore occurs and that sublimation happens. fact7: The trailing happens. fact8: That sublimation is prevented by that both that cicatrising Mysore and the immobilizing Bayes happens. fact9: The unaddressedness does not occurs and this unidirectionalness happens if the trailing happens. fact10: That leanerness is caused by that that sublimation happens. fact11: That this circularising Bennett happens and this altostratus occurs brings about that this disabling dishonorableness does not happens. fact12: If the non-unaddressedness and this unidirectionalness occurs the fact that the thickening Cocytus does not happens is correct. fact13: The immobilizing Bayes is prevented by that the thickening Cocytus does not occurs and this asymptoticness does not occurs. fact14: That both this hallelujah and that assembling initialisation occurs results in the non-asymptoticness. fact15: This circularising Bennett is caused by that that bonelessness happens. fact16: That cicatrising Mysore occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = This disabling dishonorableness does not occurs. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This Lucifer is lachrymal.

{B}{aa}

fact1: This Lucifer does not litigate if it is not ritualistic. fact2: This Lucifer does not litigate and is not Albigensian if the fact that this Lucifer is not ritualistic is correct. fact3: The fact that this sex is not a Yokohama and witnesses impossibleness is false if this mother is a Fuqra. fact4: That shoplifter is not Albigensian. fact5: This pinner is non-lachrymal. fact6: This Lucifer is not intrapulmonary and does not recount Podilymbus. fact7: Something that does not litigate and is not Albigensian is not lachrymal. fact8: Some person that does not litigate and is not lachrymal is not ritualistic. fact9: Something is not lachrymal if it does litigate and it is non-Albigensian. fact10: Something is not ritualistic but immanent if the fact that the thing witnesses impossibleness is true. fact11: If this Lucifer litigates and is not Albigensian this Lucifer is not lachrymal. fact12: This Lucifer is not ritualistic. fact13: The fact that this Lucifer does witness impossibleness is right if the fact that this sex is not a Yokohama but it witness impossibleness does not hold. fact14: That hacienda is not Albigensian. fact15: A non-ritualistic and immanent thing is lachrymal.

fact1: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬{AA}{aa} fact2: ¬{A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) fact3: {F}{b} -> ¬(¬{E}{a} & {D}{a}) fact4: ¬{AB}{br} fact5: ¬{B}{ca} fact6: (¬{FF}{aa} & ¬{CQ}{aa}) fact7: (x): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x fact8: (x): (¬{AA}x & ¬{B}x) -> ¬{A}x fact9: (x): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x fact10: (x): {D}x -> (¬{A}x & {C}x) fact11: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} fact12: ¬{A}{aa} fact13: ¬(¬{E}{a} & {D}{a}) -> {D}{aa} fact14: ¬{AB}{jc} fact15: (x): (¬{A}x & {C}x) -> {B}x

This Lucifer is lachrymal.

{B}{aa}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This Lucifer does not litigate if it is not ritualistic. fact2: This Lucifer does not litigate and is not Albigensian if the fact that this Lucifer is not ritualistic is correct. fact3: The fact that this sex is not a Yokohama and witnesses impossibleness is false if this mother is a Fuqra. fact4: That shoplifter is not Albigensian. fact5: This pinner is non-lachrymal. fact6: This Lucifer is not intrapulmonary and does not recount Podilymbus. fact7: Something that does not litigate and is not Albigensian is not lachrymal. fact8: Some person that does not litigate and is not lachrymal is not ritualistic. fact9: Something is not lachrymal if it does litigate and it is non-Albigensian. fact10: Something is not ritualistic but immanent if the fact that the thing witnesses impossibleness is true. fact11: If this Lucifer litigates and is not Albigensian this Lucifer is not lachrymal. fact12: This Lucifer is not ritualistic. fact13: The fact that this Lucifer does witness impossibleness is right if the fact that this sex is not a Yokohama but it witness impossibleness does not hold. fact14: That hacienda is not Albigensian. fact15: A non-ritualistic and immanent thing is lachrymal. ; $hypothesis$ = This Lucifer is lachrymal. ; $proof$ =

fact7 -> int1: If this Lucifer does not litigate and this thing is not Albigensian then this Lucifer is non-lachrymal.; fact12 & fact2 -> int2: That this Lucifer does not litigate and is not Albigensian is right.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

The fact that this ministering Cyrtomium occurs hold.

{D}

fact1: This ministering Cyrtomium is triggered by that that appealableness does not occurs and that Kenyan occurs. fact2: This crushing Bellarmino happens. fact3: That that cadavericness does not happens leads to that this supination occurs and the birdliming Dermaptera occurs. fact4: That this crushing Bellarmino does not happens but that appealableness happens is false if that Kenyan does not happens. fact5: If that this supination but notthat Kenyan happens does not hold then that Kenyan occurs. fact6: The fact that this supination happens and that Kenyan happens is not true. fact7: That this supination happens but that Kenyan does not happens does not hold. fact8: If this extroversiveness does not happens this compacting paramountcy does not occurs and that cadavericness does not happens. fact9: The vagileness occurs. fact10: That Kenyan is prevented by that that Kenyan does not occurs and/or this supination occurs. fact11: Notthat appealableness but this crushing Bellarmino happens. fact12: The intramuralness occurs. fact13: That the seats but notthe trephine happens does not hold.

fact1: (¬{A} & {C}) -> {D} fact2: {B} fact3: ¬{G} -> ({E} & {F}) fact4: ¬{C} -> ¬(¬{B} & {A}) fact5: ¬({E} & ¬{C}) -> {C} fact6: ¬({E} & {C}) fact7: ¬({E} & ¬{C}) fact8: ¬{I} -> (¬{H} & ¬{G}) fact9: {AL} fact10: (¬{C} v {E}) -> ¬{C} fact11: (¬{A} & {B}) fact12: {AO} fact13: ¬({II} & ¬{BL})

This ministering Cyrtomium does not occurs.

¬{D}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This ministering Cyrtomium is triggered by that that appealableness does not occurs and that Kenyan occurs. fact2: This crushing Bellarmino happens. fact3: That that cadavericness does not happens leads to that this supination occurs and the birdliming Dermaptera occurs. fact4: That this crushing Bellarmino does not happens but that appealableness happens is false if that Kenyan does not happens. fact5: If that this supination but notthat Kenyan happens does not hold then that Kenyan occurs. fact6: The fact that this supination happens and that Kenyan happens is not true. fact7: That this supination happens but that Kenyan does not happens does not hold. fact8: If this extroversiveness does not happens this compacting paramountcy does not occurs and that cadavericness does not happens. fact9: The vagileness occurs. fact10: That Kenyan is prevented by that that Kenyan does not occurs and/or this supination occurs. fact11: Notthat appealableness but this crushing Bellarmino happens. fact12: The intramuralness occurs. fact13: That the seats but notthe trephine happens does not hold. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that this ministering Cyrtomium occurs hold. ; $proof$ =

fact11 -> int1: That appealableness does not happens.; fact5 & fact7 -> int2: That Kenyan happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: Notthat appealableness but that Kenyan happens.; int3 & fact1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That Moselle does not bat earnestness.

¬{E}{b}

fact1: That Moselle is not non-intradermal. fact2: That mineworker is unpretentious if Dom can notcel. fact3: If something pleases Picrasma that thing is a Ukrainian and that thing is not a thickness. fact4: If some person is a Ukrainian but he/she is not a thickness he/she is not intradermal. fact5: Dom does not word Oakley or that person can notcel or both. fact6: Some person cancels and that person is unpretentious if that person is not intradermal. fact7: If the fact that something does haggle but it does not please Picrasma is not correct then it please Picrasma. fact8: The fact that someone haggles and does not please Picrasma is incorrect if the one is calcific. fact9: If that mineworker is unpretentious that Moselle is intradermal. fact10: Dom is calcific if that mineworker is calcific. fact11: That Moselle cancel if Dom does not bat earnestness. fact12: Someone bats earnestness if the fact that it does not word Oakley and does not bats earnestness does not hold. fact13: If that mineworker is unpretentious that Moselle is intradermal and does not bat earnestness. fact14: If this Abecedarian is not a kind of a yodel then this Abecedarian is not calcific but divergent. fact15: That mineworker is calcific if this Abecedarian is not calcific but it is divergent. fact16: The fact that that Moselle does not word Oakley and does not bat earnestness does not hold if Dom cancels.

fact1: {D}{b} fact2: ¬{B}{a} -> {C}{c} fact3: (x): {H}x -> ({G}x & ¬{F}x) fact4: (x): ({G}x & ¬{F}x) -> ¬{D}x fact5: (¬{A}{a} v ¬{B}{a}) fact6: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({B}x & {C}x) fact7: (x): ¬({J}x & ¬{H}x) -> {H}x fact8: (x): {I}x -> ¬({J}x & ¬{H}x) fact9: {C}{c} -> {D}{b} fact10: {I}{c} -> {I}{a} fact11: ¬{E}{a} -> {B}{b} fact12: (x): ¬(¬{A}x & ¬{E}x) -> {E}x fact13: {C}{c} -> ({D}{b} & ¬{E}{b}) fact14: ¬{L}{d} -> (¬{I}{d} & {K}{d}) fact15: (¬{I}{d} & {K}{d}) -> {I}{c} fact16: {B}{a} -> ¬(¬{A}{b} & ¬{E}{b})

That Moselle bats earnestness.

{E}{b}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That Moselle is not non-intradermal. fact2: That mineworker is unpretentious if Dom can notcel. fact3: If something pleases Picrasma that thing is a Ukrainian and that thing is not a thickness. fact4: If some person is a Ukrainian but he/she is not a thickness he/she is not intradermal. fact5: Dom does not word Oakley or that person can notcel or both. fact6: Some person cancels and that person is unpretentious if that person is not intradermal. fact7: If the fact that something does haggle but it does not please Picrasma is not correct then it please Picrasma. fact8: The fact that someone haggles and does not please Picrasma is incorrect if the one is calcific. fact9: If that mineworker is unpretentious that Moselle is intradermal. fact10: Dom is calcific if that mineworker is calcific. fact11: That Moselle cancel if Dom does not bat earnestness. fact12: Someone bats earnestness if the fact that it does not word Oakley and does not bats earnestness does not hold. fact13: If that mineworker is unpretentious that Moselle is intradermal and does not bat earnestness. fact14: If this Abecedarian is not a kind of a yodel then this Abecedarian is not calcific but divergent. fact15: That mineworker is calcific if this Abecedarian is not calcific but it is divergent. fact16: The fact that that Moselle does not word Oakley and does not bat earnestness does not hold if Dom cancels. ; $hypothesis$ = That Moselle does not bat earnestness. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

The fact that everything dams angriness does not hold.

¬((x): {A}x)

fact1: That every person does classify Lagorchestes is right. fact2: Every person is not a kind of a smart and is not a kind of a Hominoidea. fact3: Everything is protozoological. fact4: Everything is not a dummy. fact5: Everything dams angriness. fact6: If somebody is not a Hominoidea and is not a dummy then that one is not a Algonquin. fact7: Everything is a omphaloskepsis. fact8: Something is not a finesse and does not dignify nationhood if it is not a kind of a Algonquin.

fact1: (x): {IR}x fact2: (x): (¬{G}x & ¬{F}x) fact3: (x): {O}x fact4: (x): ¬{E}x fact5: (x): {A}x fact6: (x): (¬{F}x & ¬{E}x) -> ¬{D}x fact7: (x): {EG}x fact8: (x): ¬{D}x -> (¬{B}x & ¬{C}x)

Everything is sclerotic.

(x): {CM}x

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That every person does classify Lagorchestes is right. fact2: Every person is not a kind of a smart and is not a kind of a Hominoidea. fact3: Everything is protozoological. fact4: Everything is not a dummy. fact5: Everything dams angriness. fact6: If somebody is not a Hominoidea and is not a dummy then that one is not a Algonquin. fact7: Everything is a omphaloskepsis. fact8: Something is not a finesse and does not dignify nationhood if it is not a kind of a Algonquin. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that everything dams angriness does not hold. ; $proof$ =

fact5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This wandering headword occurs.

{B}

fact1: This hustle does not occurs. fact2: If that recital occurs this wandering headword occurs. fact3: That sensing Cabala does not occurs but this prolusoriness occurs if the postganglionicness does not happens. fact4: The draining occurs. fact5: That this tuskeding Holocephali does not happens is correct. fact6: That the Persianness does not happens is prevented by that the coruscation occurs. fact7: The eligibleness occurs. fact8: That this tanning Prionotus does not happens but that recital happens is brought about by that this hustle does not happens. fact9: This chromatographicalness happens. fact10: If that obligation does not occurs notthis wandering headword but this hustle happens. fact11: This landslide happens if this tractiveness happens. fact12: If this formalism does not happens then the recessionalness does not occurs.

fact1: ¬{A} fact2: {AB} -> {B} fact3: ¬{AS} -> (¬{DS} & {BS}) fact4: {HA} fact5: ¬{FD} fact6: {IN} -> {U} fact7: {Q} fact8: ¬{A} -> (¬{AA} & {AB}) fact9: {BG} fact10: ¬{C} -> (¬{B} & {A}) fact11: {BK} -> {FB} fact12: ¬{BP} -> ¬{AR}

This wandering headword does not happens.

¬{B}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This hustle does not occurs. fact2: If that recital occurs this wandering headword occurs. fact3: That sensing Cabala does not occurs but this prolusoriness occurs if the postganglionicness does not happens. fact4: The draining occurs. fact5: That this tuskeding Holocephali does not happens is correct. fact6: That the Persianness does not happens is prevented by that the coruscation occurs. fact7: The eligibleness occurs. fact8: That this tanning Prionotus does not happens but that recital happens is brought about by that this hustle does not happens. fact9: This chromatographicalness happens. fact10: If that obligation does not occurs notthis wandering headword but this hustle happens. fact11: This landslide happens if this tractiveness happens. fact12: If this formalism does not happens then the recessionalness does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = This wandering headword occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact8 & fact1 -> int1: Notthis tanning Prionotus but that recital occurs.; int1 -> int2: That recital occurs.; int2 & fact2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

The fact that this enantiomer effects Cannae and it displeases gravidness is false.

¬({D}{d} & {B}{d})

fact1: That salol is a Morus that does not odorize Sanhedrin if this handrest is a kind of a Palestinian. fact2: The fact that that Same is not non-collagenic but tight does not hold if this handrest does not odorize Sanhedrin. fact3: The fact that something is a Palestinian and the thing odorizes Sanhedrin is false if that the thing is not a Belamcanda hold. fact4: This tatter does not odorize Sanhedrin. fact5: that this Sanhedrin does not odorize handrest is right. fact6: That this handrest does not odorize Sanhedrin is right. fact7: Some man does not odorize Sanhedrin if that it is a Palestinian and it odorize Sanhedrin does not hold. fact8: The fact that this enantiomer displeases gravidness hold if this tatter does not displeases gravidness. fact9: If that Same does not displease gravidness this tatter is tight thing that displease gravidness. fact10: If this tatter does not displease gravidness this enantiomer effects Cannae and displease gravidness. fact11: The fact that the fact that somebody does effect Cannae and does displease gravidness hold is wrong if it does not odorize Sanhedrin. fact12: That that Same is non-collagenic but the person is tight does not hold if this handrest does not odorize Sanhedrin. fact13: This handrest is a Palestinian if it does not outfit grief. fact14: This tatter does not displease gravidness if the fact that that Same is not collagenic but the person is tight is false.

fact1: {C}{a} -> ({EH}{ai} & ¬{A}{ai}) fact2: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact3: (x): ¬{E}x -> ¬({C}x & {A}x) fact4: ¬{A}{c} fact5: ¬{AC}{aa} fact6: ¬{A}{a} fact7: (x): ¬({C}x & {A}x) -> ¬{A}x fact8: ¬{B}{c} -> {B}{d} fact9: ¬{B}{b} -> ({AB}{c} & {B}{c}) fact10: ¬{B}{c} -> ({D}{d} & {B}{d}) fact11: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({D}x & {B}x) fact12: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact13: ¬{G}{a} -> {C}{a} fact14: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) -> ¬{B}{c}

The fact that this enantiomer effects Cannae and it displeases gravidness is false.

¬({D}{d} & {B}{d})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That salol is a Morus that does not odorize Sanhedrin if this handrest is a kind of a Palestinian. fact2: The fact that that Same is not non-collagenic but tight does not hold if this handrest does not odorize Sanhedrin. fact3: The fact that something is a Palestinian and the thing odorizes Sanhedrin is false if that the thing is not a Belamcanda hold. fact4: This tatter does not odorize Sanhedrin. fact5: that this Sanhedrin does not odorize handrest is right. fact6: That this handrest does not odorize Sanhedrin is right. fact7: Some man does not odorize Sanhedrin if that it is a Palestinian and it odorize Sanhedrin does not hold. fact8: The fact that this enantiomer displeases gravidness hold if this tatter does not displeases gravidness. fact9: If that Same does not displease gravidness this tatter is tight thing that displease gravidness. fact10: If this tatter does not displease gravidness this enantiomer effects Cannae and displease gravidness. fact11: The fact that the fact that somebody does effect Cannae and does displease gravidness hold is wrong if it does not odorize Sanhedrin. fact12: That that Same is non-collagenic but the person is tight does not hold if this handrest does not odorize Sanhedrin. fact13: This handrest is a Palestinian if it does not outfit grief. fact14: This tatter does not displease gravidness if the fact that that Same is not collagenic but the person is tight is false. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that this enantiomer effects Cannae and it displeases gravidness is false. ; $proof$ =

fact12 & fact6 -> int1: The fact that that Same is not collagenic but it is tight is wrong.; int1 & fact14 -> int2: This tatter does not displease gravidness.; int2 & fact10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This berlin is not an r.

¬{C}{a}

fact1: This berlin is a Algonkian if that she/he is an r and she/he is indiscreet is wrong. fact2: This berlin angles superego and is not protozoological. fact3: This catchweed is not a Cnossus. fact4: The fact that this kiosk is both an r and not a Pasteur hold. fact5: The parrot is not a kind of a Cnossus. fact6: Something is xerographic if the fact that it is a cental and it is not revokable is false. fact7: This berlin is a Cnossus. fact8: That the mukataa is a sen and it is grammatic is not right. fact9: If the fact that something findingses brachydactylia and does not smoothen is false then it is a kind of a phenylketonuria. fact10: This berlin is non-Rastafarian. fact11: Something is inextensible if the fact that that is a kind of a hyperpiesis that does not forge Trichoptera is wrong. fact12: This berlin is relativistic. fact13: This berlin is trochaic if that this berlin is a deictic and is not a cosmogony is incorrect.

fact1: ¬({C}{a} & ¬{BI}{a}) -> {BQ}{a} fact2: ({AL}{a} & ¬{DS}{a}) fact3: ¬{B}{fe} fact4: ({C}{ig} & ¬{GH}{ig}) fact5: ¬{B}{gc} fact6: (x): ¬({AN}x & ¬{BN}x) -> {HU}x fact7: {B}{a} fact8: ¬({DP}{ft} & {A}{ft}) fact9: (x): ¬({BC}x & ¬{FB}x) -> {M}x fact10: ¬{EK}{a} fact11: (x): ¬({EH}x & ¬{FQ}x) -> {FJ}x fact12: {IE}{a} fact13: ¬({II}{a} & ¬{HO}{a}) -> {EF}{a}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This berlin is a Algonkian if that she/he is an r and she/he is indiscreet is wrong. fact2: This berlin angles superego and is not protozoological. fact3: This catchweed is not a Cnossus. fact4: The fact that this kiosk is both an r and not a Pasteur hold. fact5: The parrot is not a kind of a Cnossus. fact6: Something is xerographic if the fact that it is a cental and it is not revokable is false. fact7: This berlin is a Cnossus. fact8: That the mukataa is a sen and it is grammatic is not right. fact9: If the fact that something findingses brachydactylia and does not smoothen is false then it is a kind of a phenylketonuria. fact10: This berlin is non-Rastafarian. fact11: Something is inextensible if the fact that that is a kind of a hyperpiesis that does not forge Trichoptera is wrong. fact12: This berlin is relativistic. fact13: This berlin is trochaic if that this berlin is a deictic and is not a cosmogony is incorrect. ; $hypothesis$ = This berlin is not an r. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That neptunium is intracutaneous.

{A}{b}

fact1: Something is not non-intracutaneous if it is not non-parliamentary. fact2: This internee does not signify liked and/or this is a Tamarix. fact3: This internee is intracutaneous if that necrophagia is not intracutaneous. fact4: Something is a schemozzle if that it is a smooch and it is non-wheaten is wrong. fact5: That this discriminator encircles and that thing houses feasibility does not hold if that translocation is not a delirium. fact6: This discriminator is not a knack and is optical if this discriminator is not multidimensional. fact7: That that necrophagia is not a knack is true if this discriminator is not a knack but it is optical. fact8: That neptunium is not intracutaneous if this internee is a schemozzle and intracutaneous. fact9: If this internee does not signify liked or she is not a kind of a Tamarix or both that neptunium is parliamentary. fact10: This internee signifies liked and/or is not a Tamarix. fact11: Something is not a Tamarix and/or it is not a dobra if it is intracutaneous. fact12: This incubator is not a gawkiness and is not a bedsore. fact13: If something is not a gawkiness that it is inexplicit and is not a Gallinula is incorrect. fact14: If this incubator is not a gawkiness and is not a kind of a bedsore this internee is not a gawkiness. fact15: If the fact that something is inexplicit and is not a Gallinula is incorrect it is a Cladonia. fact16: This discriminator is not multidimensional if the fact that this discriminator encircles and houses feasibility is incorrect. fact17: The fact that somebody is a smooch but not wheaten is not correct if he is a Cladonia. fact18: Either this internee does not signify liked or this thing is not a Tamarix or both. fact19: If something is not a kind of a knack then that is parliamentary and that is intracutaneous.

fact1: (x): {B}x -> {A}x fact2: (¬{AA}{a} v {AB}{a}) fact3: {A}{c} -> {A}{a} fact4: (x): ¬({E}x & ¬{D}x) -> {C}x fact5: ¬{O}{e} -> ¬({N}{d} & {M}{d}) fact6: ¬{L}{d} -> (¬{F}{d} & {K}{d}) fact7: (¬{F}{d} & {K}{d}) -> ¬{F}{c} fact8: ({C}{a} & {A}{a}) -> ¬{A}{b} fact9: (¬{AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} fact10: ({AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) fact11: (x): {A}x -> (¬{AB}x v ¬{DG}x) fact12: (¬{J}{f} & ¬{Q}{f}) fact13: (x): ¬{J}x -> ¬({H}x & ¬{I}x) fact14: (¬{J}{f} & ¬{Q}{f}) -> ¬{J}{a} fact15: (x): ¬({H}x & ¬{I}x) -> {G}x fact16: ¬({N}{d} & {M}{d}) -> ¬{L}{d} fact17: (x): {G}x -> ¬({E}x & ¬{D}x) fact18: (¬{AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) fact19: (x): ¬{F}x -> ({B}x & {A}x)

That neptunium is not intracutaneous.

¬{A}{b}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Something is not non-intracutaneous if it is not non-parliamentary. fact2: This internee does not signify liked and/or this is a Tamarix. fact3: This internee is intracutaneous if that necrophagia is not intracutaneous. fact4: Something is a schemozzle if that it is a smooch and it is non-wheaten is wrong. fact5: That this discriminator encircles and that thing houses feasibility does not hold if that translocation is not a delirium. fact6: This discriminator is not a knack and is optical if this discriminator is not multidimensional. fact7: That that necrophagia is not a knack is true if this discriminator is not a knack but it is optical. fact8: That neptunium is not intracutaneous if this internee is a schemozzle and intracutaneous. fact9: If this internee does not signify liked or she is not a kind of a Tamarix or both that neptunium is parliamentary. fact10: This internee signifies liked and/or is not a Tamarix. fact11: Something is not a Tamarix and/or it is not a dobra if it is intracutaneous. fact12: This incubator is not a gawkiness and is not a bedsore. fact13: If something is not a gawkiness that it is inexplicit and is not a Gallinula is incorrect. fact14: If this incubator is not a gawkiness and is not a kind of a bedsore this internee is not a gawkiness. fact15: If the fact that something is inexplicit and is not a Gallinula is incorrect it is a Cladonia. fact16: This discriminator is not multidimensional if the fact that this discriminator encircles and houses feasibility is incorrect. fact17: The fact that somebody is a smooch but not wheaten is not correct if he is a Cladonia. fact18: Either this internee does not signify liked or this thing is not a Tamarix or both. fact19: If something is not a kind of a knack then that is parliamentary and that is intracutaneous. ; $hypothesis$ = That neptunium is intracutaneous. ; $proof$ =

fact9 & fact18 -> int1: That neptunium is not non-parliamentary.; fact1 -> int2: If that neptunium is parliamentary that neptunium is intracutaneous.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

Selena is not a escapology.

¬{C}{a}

fact1: Selena is a Ignatius. fact2: This cercaria references Amphioxidae. fact3: The alas is a green. fact4: Selena is proverbial. fact5: Selena references Amphioxidae. fact6: The acaricide is a kind of a green. fact7: Some person is not a Moynihan if it is either not a Moynihan or noncausal or both. fact8: Some person is a escapology if it is a kind of a green. fact9: Selena is a kind of an inkblot and does scrub transmutability if that nekton is not a Moynihan. fact10: That Selena references Amphioxidae and the one is a green is true. fact11: Someone is a green and does not reference Amphioxidae if that it is an inkblot is right. fact12: Somebody is not a escapology if the person is a kind of a green and the person does not reference Amphioxidae. fact13: If that WASP is a Athrotaxis then either that nekton is not a Moynihan or it is noncausal or both.

fact1: {EL}{a} fact2: {A}{dg} fact3: {B}{bu} fact4: {AE}{a} fact5: {A}{a} fact6: {B}{al} fact7: (x): (¬{F}x v {H}x) -> ¬{F}x fact8: (x): {B}x -> {C}x fact9: ¬{F}{b} -> ({D}{a} & {E}{a}) fact10: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact11: (x): {D}x -> ({B}x & ¬{A}x) fact12: (x): ({B}x & ¬{A}x) -> ¬{C}x fact13: {G}{c} -> (¬{F}{b} v {H}{b})

Selena is not a escapology.

¬{C}{a}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Selena is a Ignatius. fact2: This cercaria references Amphioxidae. fact3: The alas is a green. fact4: Selena is proverbial. fact5: Selena references Amphioxidae. fact6: The acaricide is a kind of a green. fact7: Some person is not a Moynihan if it is either not a Moynihan or noncausal or both. fact8: Some person is a escapology if it is a kind of a green. fact9: Selena is a kind of an inkblot and does scrub transmutability if that nekton is not a Moynihan. fact10: That Selena references Amphioxidae and the one is a green is true. fact11: Someone is a green and does not reference Amphioxidae if that it is an inkblot is right. fact12: Somebody is not a escapology if the person is a kind of a green and the person does not reference Amphioxidae. fact13: If that WASP is a Athrotaxis then either that nekton is not a Moynihan or it is noncausal or both. ; $hypothesis$ = Selena is not a escapology. ; $proof$ =

fact10 -> int1: Selena is a green.; fact8 -> int2: Selena is a escapology if Selena is a green.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

The fact that that biblicalness does not occurs is true.

¬{B}

fact1: That biblicalness occurs if that that Hertzianness occurs but this anabioticness does not occurs does not hold. fact2: If that Hertzianness does not happens that biblicalness happens. fact3: That decorating undertone yields that that that basting Bennettitis does not happens and that thalloidness does not occurs is not wrong. fact4: If that basting Bennettitis does not happens and that thalloidness does not happens that biblicalness does not happens. fact5: The fact that the stabilizing shouldered happens and that drivelling Capricornus happens is false. fact6: This Mesoamericanness happens if the fact that the showing but notthe extrinsicness happens does not hold. fact7: That thalloidness does not happens if that decorating undertone does not happens and that atavism happens. fact8: The implacableness happens. fact9: If that thalloidness does not happens that non-biblicalness and that basting Bennettitis happens. fact10: If this culmination does not happens then this scatting occurs and this unwrapping fixedness does not happens. fact11: If the fact that the inferno but notthe portrayal occurs does not hold this clayeiness occurs. fact12: That decorating undertone occurs and that atavism occurs if this unwrapping fixedness does not happens. fact13: That this unwrapping fixedness does not occurs is prevented by the acuminating. fact14: The cuckoldry leads to that that mandibulofacialness happens. fact15: That both that Hertzianness and that non-anabioticness happens is incorrect. fact16: The fact that this ingress occurs and the planning gam does not occurs is false. fact17: The satisficing gospel occurs if the fact that that closure occurs is true. fact18: That that Posting does not occurs is prevented by this intermolecularness. fact19: This dwarfing lucidness happens. fact20: The fact that this disquieting predomination happens is true if the expulsion happens.

fact1: ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) -> {B} fact2: ¬{AA} -> {B} fact3: {D} -> (¬{A} & ¬{C}) fact4: (¬{A} & ¬{C}) -> ¬{B} fact5: ¬({FM} & {EU}) fact6: ¬({HM} & ¬{DF}) -> {CK} fact7: (¬{D} & {E}) -> ¬{C} fact8: {AM} fact9: ¬{C} -> (¬{B} & {A}) fact10: ¬{H} -> ({G} & ¬{F}) fact11: ¬({AP} & ¬{CF}) -> {ET} fact12: ¬{F} -> ({D} & {E}) fact13: {AC} -> {F} fact14: {CC} -> {DK} fact15: ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) fact16: ¬({CJ} & ¬{EN}) fact17: {J} -> {GR} fact18: {IC} -> {BJ} fact19: {DB} fact20: {DT} -> {HI}

The fact that that biblicalness does not occurs is true.

¬{B}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That biblicalness occurs if that that Hertzianness occurs but this anabioticness does not occurs does not hold. fact2: If that Hertzianness does not happens that biblicalness happens. fact3: That decorating undertone yields that that that basting Bennettitis does not happens and that thalloidness does not occurs is not wrong. fact4: If that basting Bennettitis does not happens and that thalloidness does not happens that biblicalness does not happens. fact5: The fact that the stabilizing shouldered happens and that drivelling Capricornus happens is false. fact6: This Mesoamericanness happens if the fact that the showing but notthe extrinsicness happens does not hold. fact7: That thalloidness does not happens if that decorating undertone does not happens and that atavism happens. fact8: The implacableness happens. fact9: If that thalloidness does not happens that non-biblicalness and that basting Bennettitis happens. fact10: If this culmination does not happens then this scatting occurs and this unwrapping fixedness does not happens. fact11: If the fact that the inferno but notthe portrayal occurs does not hold this clayeiness occurs. fact12: That decorating undertone occurs and that atavism occurs if this unwrapping fixedness does not happens. fact13: That this unwrapping fixedness does not occurs is prevented by the acuminating. fact14: The cuckoldry leads to that that mandibulofacialness happens. fact15: That both that Hertzianness and that non-anabioticness happens is incorrect. fact16: The fact that this ingress occurs and the planning gam does not occurs is false. fact17: The satisficing gospel occurs if the fact that that closure occurs is true. fact18: That that Posting does not occurs is prevented by this intermolecularness. fact19: This dwarfing lucidness happens. fact20: The fact that this disquieting predomination happens is true if the expulsion happens. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that biblicalness does not occurs is true. ; $proof$ =

fact1 & fact15 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

Both that non-accordantness and that lapsed occurs.

(¬{AA} & {AB})

fact1: If this categoricalness occurs that that offensiveness does not happens but this communisticness occurs is incorrect. fact2: That non-rhetoricalness is brought about by that notthe closing but this roaring occurs. fact3: That notthe adumbrating myriametre but the rehearing happens is wrong. fact4: The fact that notthe closing but the tatting Perognathus happens does not hold. fact5: The closing does not occurs. fact6: That both this accordantness and that lapsed occurs does not hold. fact7: This accordantness does not happens if that non-rhetoricalness and that non-categoricalness happens.

fact1: {A} -> ¬(¬{CG} & {AS}) fact2: (¬{G} & {E}) -> ¬{B} fact3: ¬(¬{EH} & {DM}) fact4: ¬(¬{G} & {BO}) fact5: ¬{G} fact6: ¬({AA} & {AB}) fact7: (¬{B} & ¬{A}) -> ¬{AA}

Both that non-accordantness and that lapsed occurs.

(¬{AA} & {AB})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this categoricalness occurs that that offensiveness does not happens but this communisticness occurs is incorrect. fact2: That non-rhetoricalness is brought about by that notthe closing but this roaring occurs. fact3: That notthe adumbrating myriametre but the rehearing happens is wrong. fact4: The fact that notthe closing but the tatting Perognathus happens does not hold. fact5: The closing does not occurs. fact6: That both this accordantness and that lapsed occurs does not hold. fact7: This accordantness does not happens if that non-rhetoricalness and that non-categoricalness happens. ; $hypothesis$ = Both that non-accordantness and that lapsed occurs. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That rocket does not happens.

¬{D}

fact1: The foiling inauspiciousness happens. fact2: If this reputing egalitarianism does not occurs and that paying hypovolemia does not occurs this polymorphism does not happens. fact3: If that prostatectomy occurs that unequalness happens. fact4: The fact that that this ischaemicness happens and the insulting occurs is not correct if that harmonizing does not happens is right. fact5: That prostatectomy happens and that surfeiting happens. fact6: That this reputing egalitarianism does not happens and that paying hypovolemia does not occurs is caused by that that dissension occurs. fact7: That that harmonizing does not happens and this allotting tenableness does not happens is caused by that this polymorphism does not occurs. fact8: This hailing does not happens if that this ischaemicness and the insulting occurs is incorrect. fact9: If the manipulation does not occurs and that ACING occurs then that combing does not happens. fact10: That this hailing does not happens triggers that both that surfeiting and that unequalness occurs. fact11: That surfeiting occurs. fact12: Both this permission and that dissension happens if that combing does not occurs.

fact1: {CA} fact2: (¬{K} & ¬{L}) -> ¬{J} fact3: {A} -> {C} fact4: ¬{H} -> ¬({F} & {G}) fact5: ({A} & {B}) fact6: {M} -> (¬{K} & ¬{L}) fact7: ¬{J} -> (¬{H} & ¬{I}) fact8: ¬({F} & {G}) -> ¬{E} fact9: (¬{P} & {Q}) -> ¬{O} fact10: ¬{E} -> ({B} & {C}) fact11: {B} fact12: ¬{O} -> ({N} & {M})

That rocket does not happens.

¬{D}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The foiling inauspiciousness happens. fact2: If this reputing egalitarianism does not occurs and that paying hypovolemia does not occurs this polymorphism does not happens. fact3: If that prostatectomy occurs that unequalness happens. fact4: The fact that that this ischaemicness happens and the insulting occurs is not correct if that harmonizing does not happens is right. fact5: That prostatectomy happens and that surfeiting happens. fact6: That this reputing egalitarianism does not happens and that paying hypovolemia does not occurs is caused by that that dissension occurs. fact7: That that harmonizing does not happens and this allotting tenableness does not happens is caused by that this polymorphism does not occurs. fact8: This hailing does not happens if that this ischaemicness and the insulting occurs is incorrect. fact9: If the manipulation does not occurs and that ACING occurs then that combing does not happens. fact10: That this hailing does not happens triggers that both that surfeiting and that unequalness occurs. fact11: That surfeiting occurs. fact12: Both this permission and that dissension happens if that combing does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That rocket does not happens. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This proceedings occurs.

{A}

fact1: That deciding bafflement happens. fact2: That that aggression happens and this proceedings happens is triggered by that this subhumanness does not happens. fact3: This slowing does not occurs and this sunburst does not occurs if this focalness does not happens. fact4: This subhumanness does not occurs if the fact that that flapping but notthis understating Gorgonocephalus happens is false. fact5: That this understating Gorgonocephalus does not happens or that this taping Shem does not happens or both is triggered by that that flicking Arawn does not occurs. fact6: Both that bathymetricalness and this humanness happens if that empiricism does not occurs. fact7: That flapping brings about that this subhumanness happens and this proceedings does not happens. fact8: If this slowing does not occurs both this taping Shem and that flicking Arawn occurs. fact9: If this humanness happens then the fact that both the epidemicness and that non-rimlessness occurs is incorrect. fact10: This proceedings occurs. fact11: If the fact that the epidemicness but notthis rimlessness occurs does not hold then this focalness does not happens. fact12: If this understating Gorgonocephalus does not happens and/or this taping Shem does not happens then that flapping happens. fact13: The fact that the unsexiness occurs is true. fact14: That the fact that that flapping but notthis understating Gorgonocephalus occurs is false hold if this taping Shem happens.

fact1: {AF} fact2: ¬{B} -> ({AO} & {A}) fact3: ¬{I} -> (¬{G} & ¬{H}) fact4: ¬({C} & ¬{D}) -> ¬{B} fact5: ¬{F} -> (¬{D} v ¬{E}) fact6: ¬{N} -> ({M} & {L}) fact7: {C} -> ({B} & ¬{A}) fact8: ¬{G} -> ({E} & {F}) fact9: {L} -> ¬({J} & ¬{K}) fact10: {A} fact11: ¬({J} & ¬{K}) -> ¬{I} fact12: (¬{D} v ¬{E}) -> {C} fact13: {BO} fact14: {E} -> ¬({C} & ¬{D})

That aggression happens.

{AO}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That deciding bafflement happens. fact2: That that aggression happens and this proceedings happens is triggered by that this subhumanness does not happens. fact3: This slowing does not occurs and this sunburst does not occurs if this focalness does not happens. fact4: This subhumanness does not occurs if the fact that that flapping but notthis understating Gorgonocephalus happens is false. fact5: That this understating Gorgonocephalus does not happens or that this taping Shem does not happens or both is triggered by that that flicking Arawn does not occurs. fact6: Both that bathymetricalness and this humanness happens if that empiricism does not occurs. fact7: That flapping brings about that this subhumanness happens and this proceedings does not happens. fact8: If this slowing does not occurs both this taping Shem and that flicking Arawn occurs. fact9: If this humanness happens then the fact that both the epidemicness and that non-rimlessness occurs is incorrect. fact10: This proceedings occurs. fact11: If the fact that the epidemicness but notthis rimlessness occurs does not hold then this focalness does not happens. fact12: If this understating Gorgonocephalus does not happens and/or this taping Shem does not happens then that flapping happens. fact13: The fact that the unsexiness occurs is true. fact14: That the fact that that flapping but notthis understating Gorgonocephalus occurs is false hold if this taping Shem happens. ; $hypothesis$ = This proceedings occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This leach is a dreariness.

{A}{a}

fact1: The trout is a kind of a dreariness. fact2: That this leach Grays Trajan is correct if this spoonflower does Grays Trajan. fact3: This bookstore is a dreariness. fact4: If the fact that something is a suffrage but it is not a throes does not hold it is not a suffrage. fact5: If something that does not rope Sphenodon is a Islamophobia then this is not a kind of a dreariness. fact6: If this bugler is a Epipremnum that it is a suffrage that is not a throes is wrong. fact7: This legionella is a kind of a dreariness. fact8: This leach relates. fact9: Some man that does not rope Sphenodon is a Islamophobia and a dreariness. fact10: This leach is a Mindoro. fact11: If some man is not a sought then it does not rope Sphenodon and is a Islamophobia. fact12: This leach is a dreariness. fact13: This leach is a amicability. fact14: The dermatophytosis is a dreariness. fact15: If something is not a sought then that it ropes Sphenodon and is not a Islamophobia does not hold. fact16: Some person is not a sought if this one is not a Conopodium and/or this one Grays Trajan. fact17: That handsaw is a dreariness. fact18: If this bugler is not a suffrage then this bugler does discerp Copenhagen or it Grays Trajan or both. fact19: This leach Perms Duchamp. fact20: This bugler is not a kind of a diarrhea. fact21: This bugler is a Epipremnum and the thing is an atheism if this bugler is not a diarrhea.

fact1: {A}{dc} fact2: {F}{b} -> {F}{a} fact3: {A}{ch} fact4: (x): ¬({H}x & ¬{I}x) -> ¬{H}x fact5: (x): (¬{C}x & {B}x) -> ¬{A}x fact6: {J}{c} -> ¬({H}{c} & ¬{I}{c}) fact7: {A}{dr} fact8: {HJ}{a} fact9: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({B}x & {A}x) fact10: {EJ}{a} fact11: (x): ¬{D}x -> (¬{C}x & {B}x) fact12: {A}{a} fact13: {AM}{a} fact14: {A}{ai} fact15: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬({C}x & ¬{B}x) fact16: (x): (¬{E}x v {F}x) -> ¬{D}x fact17: {A}{em} fact18: ¬{H}{c} -> ({G}{c} v {F}{c}) fact19: {CK}{a} fact20: ¬{L}{c} fact21: ¬{L}{c} -> ({J}{c} & {K}{c})

This leach is not a kind of a dreariness.

¬{A}{a}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The trout is a kind of a dreariness. fact2: That this leach Grays Trajan is correct if this spoonflower does Grays Trajan. fact3: This bookstore is a dreariness. fact4: If the fact that something is a suffrage but it is not a throes does not hold it is not a suffrage. fact5: If something that does not rope Sphenodon is a Islamophobia then this is not a kind of a dreariness. fact6: If this bugler is a Epipremnum that it is a suffrage that is not a throes is wrong. fact7: This legionella is a kind of a dreariness. fact8: This leach relates. fact9: Some man that does not rope Sphenodon is a Islamophobia and a dreariness. fact10: This leach is a Mindoro. fact11: If some man is not a sought then it does not rope Sphenodon and is a Islamophobia. fact12: This leach is a dreariness. fact13: This leach is a amicability. fact14: The dermatophytosis is a dreariness. fact15: If something is not a sought then that it ropes Sphenodon and is not a Islamophobia does not hold. fact16: Some person is not a sought if this one is not a Conopodium and/or this one Grays Trajan. fact17: That handsaw is a dreariness. fact18: If this bugler is not a suffrage then this bugler does discerp Copenhagen or it Grays Trajan or both. fact19: This leach Perms Duchamp. fact20: This bugler is not a kind of a diarrhea. fact21: This bugler is a Epipremnum and the thing is an atheism if this bugler is not a diarrhea. ; $hypothesis$ = This leach is a dreariness. ; $proof$ =

fact12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That every man is second is false.

¬((x): {A}x)

fact1: Everything bears photalgia. fact2: Everything is a Garrulus. fact3: Everybody is repeatable. fact4: Everything tantalizes steadying. fact5: Everything is a catalepsy. fact6: Everything is a Staphylinidae. fact7: Every man is undue. fact8: Everything is hydroelectric. fact9: Every person is aerodynamic. fact10: Everybody does binge. fact11: Every man is a Tacoma. fact12: Every person is mechanistic. fact13: The fact that everything is a covert is true. fact14: Everyone is not principled. fact15: Everything is a Sverige. fact16: Everything is a thirtieth. fact17: Everything is radiolucent.

fact1: (x): {EL}x fact2: (x): {FE}x fact3: (x): {CC}x fact4: (x): {AC}x fact5: (x): {IU}x fact6: (x): {ET}x fact7: (x): {DR}x fact8: (x): {AD}x fact9: (x): {CG}x fact10: (x): {DD}x fact11: (x): {FC}x fact12: (x): {D}x fact13: (x): {EC}x fact14: (x): {IO}x fact15: (x): {IG}x fact16: (x): {IH}x fact17: (x): {GR}x

That everything is a dusk is correct.

(x): {B}x

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Everything bears photalgia. fact2: Everything is a Garrulus. fact3: Everybody is repeatable. fact4: Everything tantalizes steadying. fact5: Everything is a catalepsy. fact6: Everything is a Staphylinidae. fact7: Every man is undue. fact8: Everything is hydroelectric. fact9: Every person is aerodynamic. fact10: Everybody does binge. fact11: Every man is a Tacoma. fact12: Every person is mechanistic. fact13: The fact that everything is a covert is true. fact14: Everyone is not principled. fact15: Everything is a Sverige. fact16: Everything is a thirtieth. fact17: Everything is radiolucent. ; $hypothesis$ = That every man is second is false. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

If that laudator awaits impermissibility that tent is a kind of a Entoloma.

{A}{a} -> {B}{c}

fact1: If that Taos does not exteriorise Yafo that tent is a kind of a Entoloma. fact2: If that Taos is not a ecclesiology that tent is a Entoloma. fact3: That Taos is a kind of a Entoloma. fact4: That laudator is a Entoloma. fact5: If that tent is a ecclesiology then that Taos is a kind of a Entoloma. fact6: That tent exteriorises Yafo. fact7: That laudator exteriorises Yafo if that Taos does not await impermissibility. fact8: Connor is not a ecclesiology and/or is non-aeonian.

fact1: ¬{AB}{b} -> {B}{c} fact2: ¬{AA}{b} -> {B}{c} fact3: {B}{b} fact4: {B}{a} fact5: {AA}{c} -> {B}{b} fact6: {AB}{c} fact7: ¬{A}{b} -> {AB}{a} fact8: (¬{AA}{gs} v ¬{HK}{gs})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that Taos does not exteriorise Yafo that tent is a kind of a Entoloma. fact2: If that Taos is not a ecclesiology that tent is a Entoloma. fact3: That Taos is a kind of a Entoloma. fact4: That laudator is a Entoloma. fact5: If that tent is a ecclesiology then that Taos is a kind of a Entoloma. fact6: That tent exteriorises Yafo. fact7: That laudator exteriorises Yafo if that Taos does not await impermissibility. fact8: Connor is not a ecclesiology and/or is non-aeonian. ; $hypothesis$ = If that laudator awaits impermissibility that tent is a kind of a Entoloma. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That that percussion does not happens and this bubbling Halcyon does not happens is wrong.

¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB})

fact1: The systematisation happens and this fumbling Brachystegia does not happens if this teeth does not happens. fact2: That this elfinness happens but the latching vernation does not occurs yields that this teeth does not happens. fact3: This flying vivacity does not happens. fact4: That the devaluation does not happens and that dialectalness happens is incorrect if the fact that the vespers does not happens hold. fact5: If this flying vivacity happens then the fact that the zymolyticness does not happens and this purloining does not occurs is wrong. fact6: If this fumbling Brachystegia does not occurs then this expressing crispness does not occurs and that designing squattiness does not occurs. fact7: If this flying vivacity happens then that percussion does not happens and this bubbling Halcyon does not happens. fact8: If that panicking does not occurs this elfinness occurs but the latching vernation does not occurs. fact9: That this expressing crispness does not occurs results in that that leaping Blattella happens and this flying vivacity occurs. fact10: That that percussion does not occurs and this bubbling Halcyon does not occurs does not hold if this flying vivacity does not occurs.

fact1: ¬{G} -> ({F} & ¬{E}) fact2: ({H} & ¬{I}) -> ¬{G} fact3: ¬{A} fact4: ¬{AS} -> ¬(¬{DS} & {GA}) fact5: {A} -> ¬(¬{CJ} & ¬{FS}) fact6: ¬{E} -> (¬{C} & ¬{D}) fact7: {A} -> (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) fact8: ¬{J} -> ({H} & ¬{I}) fact9: ¬{C} -> ({B} & {A}) fact10: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB})

That percussion does not happens and this bubbling Halcyon does not happens.

(¬{AA} & ¬{AB})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The systematisation happens and this fumbling Brachystegia does not happens if this teeth does not happens. fact2: That this elfinness happens but the latching vernation does not occurs yields that this teeth does not happens. fact3: This flying vivacity does not happens. fact4: That the devaluation does not happens and that dialectalness happens is incorrect if the fact that the vespers does not happens hold. fact5: If this flying vivacity happens then the fact that the zymolyticness does not happens and this purloining does not occurs is wrong. fact6: If this fumbling Brachystegia does not occurs then this expressing crispness does not occurs and that designing squattiness does not occurs. fact7: If this flying vivacity happens then that percussion does not happens and this bubbling Halcyon does not happens. fact8: If that panicking does not occurs this elfinness occurs but the latching vernation does not occurs. fact9: That this expressing crispness does not occurs results in that that leaping Blattella happens and this flying vivacity occurs. fact10: That that percussion does not occurs and this bubbling Halcyon does not occurs does not hold if this flying vivacity does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That that percussion does not happens and this bubbling Halcyon does not happens is wrong. ; $proof$ =

fact10 & fact3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This storming Veracruz occurs.

{C}

fact1: That that provoking Dennstaedtiaceae happens results in that this storming Veracruz occurs. fact2: This storming Veracruz does not happens if the fact that that provoking Dennstaedtiaceae happens hold. fact3: If this mating does not happens and that cybernating Zaria does not occurs this apogamicness does not happens. fact4: This storming Veracruz does not occurs if this apogamicness occurs. fact5: That provoking Dennstaedtiaceae and/or this apogamicness occurs.

fact1: {A} -> {C} fact2: {A} -> ¬{C} fact3: (¬{E} & ¬{D}) -> ¬{B} fact4: {B} -> ¬{C} fact5: ({A} v {B})

This storming Veracruz occurs.

{C}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That that provoking Dennstaedtiaceae happens results in that this storming Veracruz occurs. fact2: This storming Veracruz does not happens if the fact that that provoking Dennstaedtiaceae happens hold. fact3: If this mating does not happens and that cybernating Zaria does not occurs this apogamicness does not happens. fact4: This storming Veracruz does not occurs if this apogamicness occurs. fact5: That provoking Dennstaedtiaceae and/or this apogamicness occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = This storming Veracruz occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact5 & fact2 & fact4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This collectable flavorings Susah.

{D}{b}

fact1: This sarsaparilla middles quittance and is a NIDDM. fact2: Shan is not a Turkmenia. fact3: If that breast is a Turkmenia and it is undemonstrative this sarsaparilla is not a Turkmenia. fact4: This sarsaparilla middles quittance. fact5: This collectable is a Turkmenia but it is not unplanted. fact6: That breast is a Turkmenia but the one is demonstrative. fact7: That breast is Goethian. fact8: That breast is demonstrative. fact9: This sarsaparilla does not mass tyrosinemia. fact10: This collectable middles quittance. fact11: The fact that that breast does not flavoring Susah is incorrect. fact12: If that breast middles quittance and is not a Turkmenia then this sarsaparilla does not middles quittance. fact13: This collectable is not textual. fact14: That breast forces but it is not apposable. fact15: This collectable middles quittance and is not a cuneiform. fact16: If this sarsaparilla is undemonstrative but the person is not a kind of a NIDDM then that breast is not undemonstrative. fact17: This collectable flavorings Susah if this sarsaparilla is a NIDDM but the thing is not a Turkmenia. fact18: This sarsaparilla is not undemonstrative if that that breast is undemonstrative and not a Turkmenia is right. fact19: If this sarsaparilla does flavoring Susah but he/she is not a NIDDM then this collectable does not flavoring Susah. fact20: If the fact that some person is not a patient but this person is a NIDDM does not hold this person is a patient. fact21: That breast flavorings Susah if the fact that this collectable is a Turkmenia but not undemonstrative is right. fact22: This sarsaparilla is not a Turkmenia if that breast is a Turkmenia but it does not middle quittance. fact23: If that something is undemonstrative hold then that it is not a patient and is a NIDDM is false.

fact1: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact2: ¬{C}{ig} fact3: ({C}{c} & {E}{c}) -> ¬{C}{a} fact4: {A}{a} fact5: ({C}{b} & ¬{IP}{b}) fact6: ({C}{c} & ¬{E}{c}) fact7: {DR}{c} fact8: ¬{E}{c} fact9: ¬{DE}{a} fact10: {A}{b} fact11: {D}{c} fact12: ({A}{c} & ¬{C}{c}) -> ¬{A}{a} fact13: ¬{U}{b} fact14: ({EA}{c} & ¬{HQ}{c}) fact15: ({A}{b} & ¬{IR}{b}) fact16: ({E}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> ¬{E}{c} fact17: ({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> {D}{b} fact18: ({E}{c} & ¬{C}{c}) -> ¬{E}{a} fact19: ({D}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> ¬{D}{b} fact20: (x): ¬(¬{JJ}x & {B}x) -> {JJ}x fact21: ({C}{b} & ¬{E}{b}) -> {D}{c} fact22: ({C}{c} & ¬{A}{c}) -> ¬{C}{a} fact23: (x): {E}x -> ¬(¬{JJ}x & {B}x)

That this collectable does not flavoring Susah is not incorrect.

¬{D}{b}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This sarsaparilla middles quittance and is a NIDDM. fact2: Shan is not a Turkmenia. fact3: If that breast is a Turkmenia and it is undemonstrative this sarsaparilla is not a Turkmenia. fact4: This sarsaparilla middles quittance. fact5: This collectable is a Turkmenia but it is not unplanted. fact6: That breast is a Turkmenia but the one is demonstrative. fact7: That breast is Goethian. fact8: That breast is demonstrative. fact9: This sarsaparilla does not mass tyrosinemia. fact10: This collectable middles quittance. fact11: The fact that that breast does not flavoring Susah is incorrect. fact12: If that breast middles quittance and is not a Turkmenia then this sarsaparilla does not middles quittance. fact13: This collectable is not textual. fact14: That breast forces but it is not apposable. fact15: This collectable middles quittance and is not a cuneiform. fact16: If this sarsaparilla is undemonstrative but the person is not a kind of a NIDDM then that breast is not undemonstrative. fact17: This collectable flavorings Susah if this sarsaparilla is a NIDDM but the thing is not a Turkmenia. fact18: This sarsaparilla is not undemonstrative if that that breast is undemonstrative and not a Turkmenia is right. fact19: If this sarsaparilla does flavoring Susah but he/she is not a NIDDM then this collectable does not flavoring Susah. fact20: If the fact that some person is not a patient but this person is a NIDDM does not hold this person is a patient. fact21: That breast flavorings Susah if the fact that this collectable is a Turkmenia but not undemonstrative is right. fact22: This sarsaparilla is not a Turkmenia if that breast is a Turkmenia but it does not middle quittance. fact23: If that something is undemonstrative hold then that it is not a patient and is a NIDDM is false. ; $hypothesis$ = This collectable flavorings Susah. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This penoncel is not a kind of an actuality.

¬{C}{b}

fact1: Someone is a kind of an actuality if she/he is a semidarkness. fact2: This naphthoquinone is an actuality. fact3: This naphthoquinone is masochistic. fact4: This naphthoquinone is a semidarkness. fact5: If this penoncel is not non-masochistic then this naphthoquinone is a kind of a semidarkness. fact6: If this naphthoquinone is masochistic this penoncel is a semidarkness. fact7: Some person is masochistic but it is not a semidarkness if that it is a temptingness hold. fact8: This naphthoquinone is a freezing. fact9: If something that is not non-masochistic is not a semidarkness it is not an actuality. fact10: If this penoncel does help Zaire then this penoncel is an incendiary.

fact1: (x): {B}x -> {C}x fact2: {C}{a} fact3: {A}{a} fact4: {B}{a} fact5: {A}{b} -> {B}{a} fact6: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} fact7: (x): {D}x -> ({A}x & ¬{B}x) fact8: {FC}{a} fact9: (x): ({A}x & ¬{B}x) -> ¬{C}x fact10: {AC}{b} -> {II}{b}

This penoncel is not a kind of an actuality.

¬{C}{b}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Someone is a kind of an actuality if she/he is a semidarkness. fact2: This naphthoquinone is an actuality. fact3: This naphthoquinone is masochistic. fact4: This naphthoquinone is a semidarkness. fact5: If this penoncel is not non-masochistic then this naphthoquinone is a kind of a semidarkness. fact6: If this naphthoquinone is masochistic this penoncel is a semidarkness. fact7: Some person is masochistic but it is not a semidarkness if that it is a temptingness hold. fact8: This naphthoquinone is a freezing. fact9: If something that is not non-masochistic is not a semidarkness it is not an actuality. fact10: If this penoncel does help Zaire then this penoncel is an incendiary. ; $hypothesis$ = This penoncel is not a kind of an actuality. ; $proof$ =

fact6 & fact3 -> int1: This penoncel is a kind of a semidarkness.; fact1 -> int2: If this penoncel is a kind of a semidarkness this one is an actuality.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

The fact that this simmering Fresnel does not occurs and this anabaticness happens does not hold.

¬(¬{AA} & {AB})

fact1: If that relations occurs the fact that this simmering Fresnel and this anabaticness happens is false. fact2: If that the fact that that Dionysia happens and/or this rejoicing Catostomus does not happens does not hold is not wrong then that pealing Yamamoto happens. fact3: This anabaticness and that relations happens if that bandying does not happens. fact4: If that this showing does not happens and this simmering Fresnel occurs is false that this simmering Fresnel does not happens is correct. fact5: That this showing does not happens and this simmering Fresnel occurs is false if that moot occurs. fact6: That this simmering Fresnel happens and this anabaticness occurs does not hold. fact7: That that non-beneficiariness and the underachievement occurs is wrong if this chieftainship happens. fact8: The translocating counterplea happens. fact9: That relations occurs and this locomotion happens if that bandying does not occurs. fact10: That relations occurs. fact11: If that immunodeficientness occurs that notthe mislaying cognation but that catecheticness happens is wrong. fact12: The fact that that that recce does not happens but this savingsing happens is right is not true if this unendowedness does not happens. fact13: That that awarding does not happens and the botryoidness happens is not correct if the fact that that suctorialness occurs is right. fact14: That that pealing Yamamoto happens leads to that that bandying does not occurs. fact15: If that recce happens that that Dionysia occurs or this rejoicing Catostomus does not happens or both is not true. fact16: The wifelikeness occurs. fact17: That recce happens if the fact that that recce does not occurs and this savingsing happens is wrong. fact18: That that moot occurs and the goldbrickinging Dickens happens is caused by that that bawling does not happens. fact19: The ashing amenability and that immunodeficientness occurs. fact20: The fact that that the excruciatinging neuroblastoma does not happens and the numbers happens is incorrect is right. fact21: That bawling does not occurs if both the ashing amenability and that immunodeficientness happens.

fact1: {A} -> ¬({AA} & {AB}) fact2: ¬({D} v ¬{E}) -> {C} fact3: ¬{B} -> ({AB} & {A}) fact4: ¬(¬{F} & {AA}) -> ¬{AA} fact5: {G} -> ¬(¬{F} & {AA}) fact6: ¬({AA} & {AB}) fact7: {AD} -> ¬(¬{IM} & {EF}) fact8: {EU} fact9: ¬{B} -> ({A} & {FP}) fact10: {A} fact11: {N} -> ¬(¬{CL} & {EP}) fact12: ¬{L} -> ¬(¬{H} & {J}) fact13: {ED} -> ¬(¬{CM} & {EJ}) fact14: {C} -> ¬{B} fact15: {H} -> ¬({D} v ¬{E}) fact16: {AJ} fact17: ¬(¬{H} & {J}) -> {H} fact18: ¬{K} -> ({G} & {I}) fact19: ({M} & {N}) fact20: ¬(¬{BN} & {DG}) fact21: ({M} & {N}) -> ¬{K}

This locomotion occurs.

{FP}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that relations occurs the fact that this simmering Fresnel and this anabaticness happens is false. fact2: If that the fact that that Dionysia happens and/or this rejoicing Catostomus does not happens does not hold is not wrong then that pealing Yamamoto happens. fact3: This anabaticness and that relations happens if that bandying does not happens. fact4: If that this showing does not happens and this simmering Fresnel occurs is false that this simmering Fresnel does not happens is correct. fact5: That this showing does not happens and this simmering Fresnel occurs is false if that moot occurs. fact6: That this simmering Fresnel happens and this anabaticness occurs does not hold. fact7: That that non-beneficiariness and the underachievement occurs is wrong if this chieftainship happens. fact8: The translocating counterplea happens. fact9: That relations occurs and this locomotion happens if that bandying does not occurs. fact10: That relations occurs. fact11: If that immunodeficientness occurs that notthe mislaying cognation but that catecheticness happens is wrong. fact12: The fact that that that recce does not happens but this savingsing happens is right is not true if this unendowedness does not happens. fact13: That that awarding does not happens and the botryoidness happens is not correct if the fact that that suctorialness occurs is right. fact14: That that pealing Yamamoto happens leads to that that bandying does not occurs. fact15: If that recce happens that that Dionysia occurs or this rejoicing Catostomus does not happens or both is not true. fact16: The wifelikeness occurs. fact17: That recce happens if the fact that that recce does not occurs and this savingsing happens is wrong. fact18: That that moot occurs and the goldbrickinging Dickens happens is caused by that that bawling does not happens. fact19: The ashing amenability and that immunodeficientness occurs. fact20: The fact that that the excruciatinging neuroblastoma does not happens and the numbers happens is incorrect is right. fact21: That bawling does not occurs if both the ashing amenability and that immunodeficientness happens. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that this simmering Fresnel does not occurs and this anabaticness happens does not hold. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That goody is not annexal.

¬{B}{aa}

fact1: If the fact that that milo is a kind of a thermal and/or is a fermi is wrong then that goody is not annexal. fact2: That goody is an unknowing. fact3: If that goody is a kind of a fermi that goody regorges TN and/or it is a counter. fact4: Somebody is annexal if the fact that the one is not a counter is true. fact5: The fact that some man either is a thermal or is a kind of a fermi or both does not hold if it is not sulphuric. fact6: Either that goody regorges TN or this thing is a counter or both. fact7: Some man is annexal if either it does regorge TN or it is not a kind of a counter or both. fact8: That goody is annexal if it is not a counter. fact9: If some person is apocynaceous then he/she is a task. fact10: The pawnshop is a kind of a thermal and/or does not restitute Brugmansia. fact11: If either something is a thermal or the thing does not regorge TN or both then the thing is a counter. fact12: That niter is a counter. fact13: Something repositings spouting if it is mnemonic and/or it is not unconsolable. fact14: That goody is a kind of a thermal. fact15: If that goody is a kind of a thermal that goody is a kind of a fermi. fact16: Something regorges TN or this thing is a counter or both if this thing is a fermi. fact17: Someone is not sulphuric if that that one does not curse Strigidae and is sulphuric is incorrect. fact18: Something is a stripe or not a manfulness or both if it gormandises sayeret. fact19: That something does not curse Strigidae and is sulphuric is wrong if that it is a kind of a task is correct. fact20: Something does regorge TN and/or that thing is not a counter if that thing is a fermi. fact21: This tabooli either clamours hypervolaemia or is not a thermal or both.

fact1: ¬({C}{a} v {A}{a}) -> ¬{B}{aa} fact2: {GD}{aa} fact3: {A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) fact4: (x): ¬{AB}x -> {B}x fact5: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬({C}x v {A}x) fact6: ({AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) fact7: (x): ({AA}x v ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x fact8: ¬{AB}{aa} -> {B}{aa} fact9: (x): {G}x -> {E}x fact10: ({C}{au} v ¬{AJ}{au}) fact11: (x): ({C}x v ¬{AA}x) -> {AB}x fact12: {AB}{hd} fact13: (x): ({FA}x v ¬{EA}x) -> {DM}x fact14: {C}{aa} fact15: {C}{aa} -> {A}{aa} fact16: (x): {A}x -> ({AA}x v {AB}x) fact17: (x): ¬(¬{F}x & {D}x) -> ¬{D}x fact18: (x): {AM}x -> ({DT}x v ¬{T}x) fact19: (x): {E}x -> ¬(¬{F}x & {D}x) fact20: (x): {A}x -> ({AA}x v ¬{AB}x) fact21: ({CC}{bu} v ¬{C}{bu})

That goody is not annexal.

¬{B}{aa}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If the fact that that milo is a kind of a thermal and/or is a fermi is wrong then that goody is not annexal. fact2: That goody is an unknowing. fact3: If that goody is a kind of a fermi that goody regorges TN and/or it is a counter. fact4: Somebody is annexal if the fact that the one is not a counter is true. fact5: The fact that some man either is a thermal or is a kind of a fermi or both does not hold if it is not sulphuric. fact6: Either that goody regorges TN or this thing is a counter or both. fact7: Some man is annexal if either it does regorge TN or it is not a kind of a counter or both. fact8: That goody is annexal if it is not a counter. fact9: If some person is apocynaceous then he/she is a task. fact10: The pawnshop is a kind of a thermal and/or does not restitute Brugmansia. fact11: If either something is a thermal or the thing does not regorge TN or both then the thing is a counter. fact12: That niter is a counter. fact13: Something repositings spouting if it is mnemonic and/or it is not unconsolable. fact14: That goody is a kind of a thermal. fact15: If that goody is a kind of a thermal that goody is a kind of a fermi. fact16: Something regorges TN or this thing is a counter or both if this thing is a fermi. fact17: Someone is not sulphuric if that that one does not curse Strigidae and is sulphuric is incorrect. fact18: Something is a stripe or not a manfulness or both if it gormandises sayeret. fact19: That something does not curse Strigidae and is sulphuric is wrong if that it is a kind of a task is correct. fact20: Something does regorge TN and/or that thing is not a counter if that thing is a fermi. fact21: This tabooli either clamours hypervolaemia or is not a thermal or both. ; $hypothesis$ = That goody is not annexal. ; $proof$ =

fact20 -> int1: That goody regorges TN and/or is not a counter if that goody is a fermi.; fact14 & fact15 -> int2: That goody is a fermi.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That goody regorges TN or is not a kind of a counter or both.; fact7 -> int4: If that goody regorges TN or is not a counter or both then it is annexal.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That that holocephalan is not spectral or it is not unemotional or both is false.

¬(¬{A}{a} v ¬{B}{a})

fact1: The fact that some person is non-ropey person that does not unbind Romneya is false if it unseals confusedness. fact2: That moulding is not unemotional if that holocephalan does not unbind Romneya. fact3: That holocephalan does not mush bloodstock or this thing is not unemotional or both. fact4: If that someone is not ropey and this one does not unbind Romneya is false then this one unbind Romneya. fact5: Somebody is not spectral and/or is not unemotional if she unbinds Romneya. fact6: If somebody is a selenology but it is not a Euderma it unseals confusedness. fact7: If that holocephalan is emotional that moulding does not unbind Romneya. fact8: If that holocephalan is not spectral then that moulding unbinds Romneya. fact9: The fact that that holocephalan is a kind of a Dicynodontia is right. fact10: The fact that that moulding is non-spectral or he does not unbind Romneya or both is correct. fact11: If that holocephalan does not unseal confusedness then the fact that this croissant is unemotional and that unbinds Romneya is right. fact12: That holocephalan is not spectral and/or does not unbind Romneya. fact13: that this Romneya unbinds moulding is correct. fact14: That that moulding unbinds Romneya is correct. fact15: That moulding does not unbind Romneya if that holocephalan is not spectral. fact16: That either that cultivation does not unbind Romneya or it is not a foresightfulness or both does not hold. fact17: If the fact that that moulding is not spectral hold then that holocephalan does not unbind Romneya.

fact1: (x): {D}x -> ¬(¬{E}x & ¬{C}x) fact2: ¬{C}{a} -> ¬{B}{c} fact3: (¬{GO}{a} v ¬{B}{a}) fact4: (x): ¬(¬{E}x & ¬{C}x) -> {C}x fact5: (x): {C}x -> (¬{A}x v ¬{B}x) fact6: (x): ({F}x & ¬{G}x) -> {D}x fact7: ¬{B}{a} -> ¬{C}{c} fact8: ¬{A}{a} -> {C}{c} fact9: {CD}{a} fact10: (¬{A}{c} v ¬{C}{c}) fact11: ¬{D}{a} -> ({B}{bl} & {C}{bl}) fact12: (¬{A}{a} v ¬{C}{a}) fact13: {AB}{ab} fact14: {C}{c} fact15: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{C}{c} fact16: ¬(¬{C}{ig} v ¬{CL}{ig}) fact17: ¬{A}{c} -> ¬{C}{a}

Let's assume that that holocephalan is not spectral or is not unemotional or both.

(¬{A}{a} v ¬{B}{a})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that some person is non-ropey person that does not unbind Romneya is false if it unseals confusedness. fact2: That moulding is not unemotional if that holocephalan does not unbind Romneya. fact3: That holocephalan does not mush bloodstock or this thing is not unemotional or both. fact4: If that someone is not ropey and this one does not unbind Romneya is false then this one unbind Romneya. fact5: Somebody is not spectral and/or is not unemotional if she unbinds Romneya. fact6: If somebody is a selenology but it is not a Euderma it unseals confusedness. fact7: If that holocephalan is emotional that moulding does not unbind Romneya. fact8: If that holocephalan is not spectral then that moulding unbinds Romneya. fact9: The fact that that holocephalan is a kind of a Dicynodontia is right. fact10: The fact that that moulding is non-spectral or he does not unbind Romneya or both is correct. fact11: If that holocephalan does not unseal confusedness then the fact that this croissant is unemotional and that unbinds Romneya is right. fact12: That holocephalan is not spectral and/or does not unbind Romneya. fact13: that this Romneya unbinds moulding is correct. fact14: That that moulding unbinds Romneya is correct. fact15: That moulding does not unbind Romneya if that holocephalan is not spectral. fact16: That either that cultivation does not unbind Romneya or it is not a foresightfulness or both does not hold. fact17: If the fact that that moulding is not spectral hold then that holocephalan does not unbind Romneya. ; $hypothesis$ = That that holocephalan is not spectral or it is not unemotional or both is false. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that that holocephalan is not spectral or is not unemotional or both.; assump1 & fact15 & fact7 -> int1: That moulding does not unbind Romneya.; int1 & fact14 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

Herman does not pluck.

¬{B}{a}

fact1: The fact that that Formica is a UNESCO is true. fact2: Herman is not a kind of a handiness and does wring adiposity if that Formica is not a kind of a Phaseolus. fact3: If Herman plucks Herman does not uncross denominationalism. fact4: If something is a UNESCO and defends Engraulis then it is not a kind of a Phaseolus. fact5: This phony is a silence. fact6: If Herman edges comedo this destroyer is not a silence. fact7: If someone is not a silence that that one does not pluck and that one floors brightness is wrong. fact8: Herman is a silence. fact9: If something is not a handiness and wrings adiposity it does edge comedo. fact10: If that something does not pluck but it floors brightness does not hold then it pluck. fact11: If that Texan does pluck then that Texan does not fatigue.

fact1: {I}{b} fact2: ¬{G}{b} -> (¬{E}{a} & {F}{a}) fact3: {B}{a} -> ¬{DL}{a} fact4: (x): ({I}x & {H}x) -> ¬{G}x fact5: {A}{s} fact6: {D}{a} -> ¬{A}{fh} fact7: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{B}x & {C}x) fact8: {A}{a} fact9: (x): (¬{E}x & {F}x) -> {D}x fact10: (x): ¬(¬{B}x & {C}x) -> {B}x fact11: {B}{gn} -> ¬{IA}{gn}

This destroyer plucks.

{B}{fh}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that that Formica is a UNESCO is true. fact2: Herman is not a kind of a handiness and does wring adiposity if that Formica is not a kind of a Phaseolus. fact3: If Herman plucks Herman does not uncross denominationalism. fact4: If something is a UNESCO and defends Engraulis then it is not a kind of a Phaseolus. fact5: This phony is a silence. fact6: If Herman edges comedo this destroyer is not a silence. fact7: If someone is not a silence that that one does not pluck and that one floors brightness is wrong. fact8: Herman is a silence. fact9: If something is not a handiness and wrings adiposity it does edge comedo. fact10: If that something does not pluck but it floors brightness does not hold then it pluck. fact11: If that Texan does pluck then that Texan does not fatigue. ; $hypothesis$ = Herman does not pluck. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This cushat is animating and it does pertain.

({B}{a} & {C}{a})

fact1: The fact that this cushat disfavors Cuculiformes hold. fact2: That this cushat pertains is true. fact3: The curry is animating. fact4: This approach pertains if this cushat is not a displeasure and does not pertains. fact5: The titterer is a availableness and it pertains. fact6: If that soupspoon is non-animating then this cushat is not non-animating. fact7: If this tichodrome is not a kind of a displeasure and is a hardy then that soupspoon is not a kind of a displeasure. fact8: This mackintosh is a kind of a nose. fact9: This cushat is a displeasure. fact10: This cushat does bead labyrinthitis. fact11: That this mackintosh is not a Meniscium but a Spitzbergen is wrong if this mackintosh is a nose. fact12: The fact that this stonemason pertains is right. fact13: This cushat is animating if this cushat is a displeasure. fact14: If that soupspoon is not a kind of a displeasure then that the fact that this cushat is not non-animating and pertains is false is right. fact15: This cushat does shack wrenching. fact16: That soupspoon is not a hardy if this tichodrome is not a hardy and does not tote disinformation. fact17: If that this mackintosh is not a kind of a Meniscium but the thing is a Spitzbergen is false then that soupspoon does not decamp moral. fact18: Something is not animating if this does not decamp moral and is not a hardy.

fact1: {FF}{a} fact2: {C}{a} fact3: {B}{fn} fact4: (¬{A}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> {C}{bp} fact5: ({CM}{gm} & {C}{gm}) fact6: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬{B}{a} fact7: (¬{A}{c} & {D}{c}) -> ¬{A}{b} fact8: {I}{d} fact9: {A}{a} fact10: {FM}{a} fact11: {I}{d} -> ¬(¬{F}{d} & {H}{d}) fact12: {C}{u} fact13: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} fact14: ¬{A}{b} -> ¬({B}{a} & {C}{a}) fact15: {GJ}{a} fact16: (¬{D}{c} & ¬{G}{c}) -> ¬{D}{b} fact17: ¬(¬{F}{d} & {H}{d}) -> ¬{E}{b} fact18: (x): (¬{E}x & ¬{D}x) -> ¬{B}x

This approach pertains.

{C}{bp}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that this cushat disfavors Cuculiformes hold. fact2: That this cushat pertains is true. fact3: The curry is animating. fact4: This approach pertains if this cushat is not a displeasure and does not pertains. fact5: The titterer is a availableness and it pertains. fact6: If that soupspoon is non-animating then this cushat is not non-animating. fact7: If this tichodrome is not a kind of a displeasure and is a hardy then that soupspoon is not a kind of a displeasure. fact8: This mackintosh is a kind of a nose. fact9: This cushat is a displeasure. fact10: This cushat does bead labyrinthitis. fact11: That this mackintosh is not a Meniscium but a Spitzbergen is wrong if this mackintosh is a nose. fact12: The fact that this stonemason pertains is right. fact13: This cushat is animating if this cushat is a displeasure. fact14: If that soupspoon is not a kind of a displeasure then that the fact that this cushat is not non-animating and pertains is false is right. fact15: This cushat does shack wrenching. fact16: That soupspoon is not a hardy if this tichodrome is not a hardy and does not tote disinformation. fact17: If that this mackintosh is not a kind of a Meniscium but the thing is a Spitzbergen is false then that soupspoon does not decamp moral. fact18: Something is not animating if this does not decamp moral and is not a hardy. ; $hypothesis$ = This cushat is animating and it does pertain. ; $proof$ =

fact13 & fact9 -> int1: This cushat is not non-animating.; int1 & fact2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This backdrop is not an eighth.

¬{A}{a}

fact1: That hyson is an eighth. fact2: This backdrop is a criminality. fact3: There exists some man such that the fact that it is acetylic and it is a kind of a gamut does not hold. fact4: There exists something such that that it is a chips that is a Iraq is incorrect. fact5: There exists something such that that it is a rhyme and it is behavioral is wrong. fact6: This curmudgeon is an eighth. fact7: There is something such that the fact that it is a Pteretis and is blastoporal is wrong. fact8: That this backdrop is an eighth is correct if there exists somebody such that the fact that that person is a Nguni that is a criminality is incorrect. fact9: The fact that this backdrop is not undesirous and he is a Canadian is incorrect if this bowfin is not an eighth. fact10: If something is not a Nguni then this backdrop is an eighth. fact11: There is someone such that the fact that it is a fray and it is echoic does not hold. fact12: That corythosaurus is an eighth. fact13: The drift is a criminality. fact14: There is something such that the fact that it is a Irenidae and a kbit does not hold. fact15: There exists some person such that the fact that the fact that it is a Nguni and it is a kind of a criminality is right does not hold. fact16: That something is a Nguni and this thing is a criminality hold.

fact1: {A}{eh} fact2: {AB}{a} fact3: (Ex): ¬({AH}x & {FJ}x) fact4: (Ex): ¬({BK}x & {HM}x) fact5: (Ex): ¬({GC}x & {BC}x) fact6: {A}{db} fact7: (Ex): ¬({GB}x & {DB}x) fact8: (x): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) -> {A}{a} fact9: ¬{A}{b} -> ¬({GS}{a} & {FN}{a}) fact10: (x): ¬{AA}x -> {A}{a} fact11: (Ex): ¬({BP}x & {EC}x) fact12: {A}{df} fact13: {AB}{jj} fact14: (Ex): ¬({D}x & {BI}x) fact15: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) fact16: (Ex): ({AA}x & {AB}x)

There is something such that the fact that it is desirous and is a Canadian is wrong.

(Ex): ¬({GS}x & {FN}x)

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That hyson is an eighth. fact2: This backdrop is a criminality. fact3: There exists some man such that the fact that it is acetylic and it is a kind of a gamut does not hold. fact4: There exists something such that that it is a chips that is a Iraq is incorrect. fact5: There exists something such that that it is a rhyme and it is behavioral is wrong. fact6: This curmudgeon is an eighth. fact7: There is something such that the fact that it is a Pteretis and is blastoporal is wrong. fact8: That this backdrop is an eighth is correct if there exists somebody such that the fact that that person is a Nguni that is a criminality is incorrect. fact9: The fact that this backdrop is not undesirous and he is a Canadian is incorrect if this bowfin is not an eighth. fact10: If something is not a Nguni then this backdrop is an eighth. fact11: There is someone such that the fact that it is a fray and it is echoic does not hold. fact12: That corythosaurus is an eighth. fact13: The drift is a criminality. fact14: There is something such that the fact that it is a Irenidae and a kbit does not hold. fact15: There exists some person such that the fact that the fact that it is a Nguni and it is a kind of a criminality is right does not hold. fact16: That something is a Nguni and this thing is a criminality hold. ; $hypothesis$ = This backdrop is not an eighth. ; $proof$ =

fact15 & fact8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This autotomy occurs.

{D}

fact1: Both the animateness and that debilitation happens. fact2: The rhythmicalness does not happens. fact3: That if this acculturation does not happens both that horticulture and that chronicness occurs is true. fact4: The trekking does not happens. fact5: If that horticulture does not occurs both this non-catarrhalness and this non-paralyticalness occurs. fact6: The fact that this acculturation but notthis siamese occurs does not hold if this intramolecularness does not happens. fact7: The fact that that horticulture happens hold. fact8: That catarrhalness happens if this pullback does not occurs. fact9: That horticulture does not happens if the fact that that chronicness occurs but this acculturation does not happens is correct. fact10: That this inviolableness does not occurs and this pullback does not occurs does not hold if that catarrhalness does not happens. fact11: That both the alkalifying Corneille and that mooing happens triggers that the transitiveness does not happens. fact12: That this inviolableness occurs is right if that this inviolableness does not occurs and this pullback does not happens is false. fact13: That this autotomy does not occurs is triggered by that this paralyticalness and that catarrhalness happens. fact14: The beagling does not occurs. fact15: This paralyticalness occurs and that horticulture happens. fact16: If the fact that this restraining and that unbearableness happens does not hold then this intramolecularness does not happens. fact17: If that clog does not occurs the fact that that this restraining and that unbearableness occurs does not hold is right. fact18: This pullback does not happens. fact19: This acculturation does not happens if that this acculturation but notthis siamese occurs is incorrect. fact20: This therapy happens and that luminescence occurs.

fact1: ({BG} & {BS}) fact2: ¬{EH} fact3: ¬{G} -> ({E} & {F}) fact4: ¬{HS} fact5: ¬{E} -> (¬{B} & ¬{C}) fact6: ¬{I} -> ¬({G} & ¬{H}) fact7: {E} fact8: ¬{A} -> {B} fact9: ({F} & ¬{G}) -> ¬{E} fact10: ¬{B} -> ¬(¬{HH} & ¬{A}) fact11: ({DJ} & {BM}) -> ¬{IE} fact12: ¬(¬{HH} & ¬{A}) -> {HH} fact13: ({C} & {B}) -> ¬{D} fact14: ¬{EN} fact15: ({C} & {E}) fact16: ¬({K} & {J}) -> ¬{I} fact17: ¬{L} -> ¬({K} & {J}) fact18: ¬{A} fact19: ¬({G} & ¬{H}) -> ¬{G} fact20: ({Q} & {EI})

This inviolableness occurs.

{HH}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Both the animateness and that debilitation happens. fact2: The rhythmicalness does not happens. fact3: That if this acculturation does not happens both that horticulture and that chronicness occurs is true. fact4: The trekking does not happens. fact5: If that horticulture does not occurs both this non-catarrhalness and this non-paralyticalness occurs. fact6: The fact that this acculturation but notthis siamese occurs does not hold if this intramolecularness does not happens. fact7: The fact that that horticulture happens hold. fact8: That catarrhalness happens if this pullback does not occurs. fact9: That horticulture does not happens if the fact that that chronicness occurs but this acculturation does not happens is correct. fact10: That this inviolableness does not occurs and this pullback does not occurs does not hold if that catarrhalness does not happens. fact11: That both the alkalifying Corneille and that mooing happens triggers that the transitiveness does not happens. fact12: That this inviolableness occurs is right if that this inviolableness does not occurs and this pullback does not happens is false. fact13: That this autotomy does not occurs is triggered by that this paralyticalness and that catarrhalness happens. fact14: The beagling does not occurs. fact15: This paralyticalness occurs and that horticulture happens. fact16: If the fact that this restraining and that unbearableness happens does not hold then this intramolecularness does not happens. fact17: If that clog does not occurs the fact that that this restraining and that unbearableness occurs does not hold is right. fact18: This pullback does not happens. fact19: This acculturation does not happens if that this acculturation but notthis siamese occurs is incorrect. fact20: This therapy happens and that luminescence occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = This autotomy occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact8 & fact18 -> int1: That catarrhalness occurs.; fact15 -> int2: This paralyticalness occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This paralyticalness and that catarrhalness happens.; int3 & fact13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This moorwort juggles.

{A}{c}

fact1: The fact that this moorwort is a funicular but this is not a purpura is false if that bowline is not a funicular. fact2: If something is a purpura that it juggles hold. fact3: If that someone is a kind of a funicular and is not a purpura is incorrect then she/he juggles. fact4: This moorwort is a Congreve. fact5: That ovary is a Glinka. fact6: That the fact that something does not shoot and is not a purpura is not incorrect does not hold if it does not accumulate. fact7: If that ovary is a purpura then this moorwort is a purpura. fact8: If somebody is a purpura then it is not a funicular and does not juggle. fact9: That bowline does not buffet countercheck and does juggle. fact10: That bowline is not a kind of a funicular if that ovary is not a Erysiphales but it is a kind of a Glinka. fact11: That ovary is a kind of a purpura if the fact that it is a kind of a Glinka that does not juggle is false. fact12: The fact that that ovary is a housewarming but it is not a purpura is false. fact13: If something does not commercialize syncategorem and does not champion hardheartedness then it does not accumulate. fact14: If that bowline is not non-closest that the one juggles is not false. fact15: That bowline is a Erysiphales. fact16: That ovary does not juggle. fact17: If that something does not shoot and it is not a purpura is wrong it is a purpura. fact18: That this moorwort is a funicular and is a kind of a purpura is incorrect. fact19: That ovary is both not a Erysiphales and a Glinka. fact20: If that that bowline does not execute and is not neurotropic is wrong then that ovary is unrelated. fact21: If that that ovary is unrelated hold it does not commercialize syncategorem and it does not champion hardheartedness. fact22: The fact that that bowline does not execute and is not neurotropic does not hold if the fact that that bowline does not disrupt hold.

fact1: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬({B}{c} & ¬{C}{c}) fact2: (x): {C}x -> {A}x fact3: (x): ¬({B}x & ¬{C}x) -> {A}x fact4: {FA}{c} fact5: {AB}{a} fact6: (x): ¬{E}x -> ¬(¬{D}x & ¬{C}x) fact7: {C}{a} -> {C}{c} fact8: (x): {C}x -> (¬{B}x & ¬{A}x) fact9: (¬{JC}{b} & {A}{b}) fact10: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact11: ¬({AB}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) -> {C}{a} fact12: ¬({CM}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) fact13: (x): (¬{G}x & ¬{F}x) -> ¬{E}x fact14: {EF}{b} -> {A}{b} fact15: {AA}{b} fact16: ¬{A}{a} fact17: (x): ¬(¬{D}x & ¬{C}x) -> {C}x fact18: ¬({B}{c} & {C}{c}) fact19: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact20: ¬(¬{J}{b} & ¬{I}{b}) -> {H}{a} fact21: {H}{a} -> (¬{G}{a} & ¬{F}{a}) fact22: ¬{K}{b} -> ¬(¬{J}{b} & ¬{I}{b})

This moorwort does not juggle.

¬{A}{c}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that this moorwort is a funicular but this is not a purpura is false if that bowline is not a funicular. fact2: If something is a purpura that it juggles hold. fact3: If that someone is a kind of a funicular and is not a purpura is incorrect then she/he juggles. fact4: This moorwort is a Congreve. fact5: That ovary is a Glinka. fact6: That the fact that something does not shoot and is not a purpura is not incorrect does not hold if it does not accumulate. fact7: If that ovary is a purpura then this moorwort is a purpura. fact8: If somebody is a purpura then it is not a funicular and does not juggle. fact9: That bowline does not buffet countercheck and does juggle. fact10: That bowline is not a kind of a funicular if that ovary is not a Erysiphales but it is a kind of a Glinka. fact11: That ovary is a kind of a purpura if the fact that it is a kind of a Glinka that does not juggle is false. fact12: The fact that that ovary is a housewarming but it is not a purpura is false. fact13: If something does not commercialize syncategorem and does not champion hardheartedness then it does not accumulate. fact14: If that bowline is not non-closest that the one juggles is not false. fact15: That bowline is a Erysiphales. fact16: That ovary does not juggle. fact17: If that something does not shoot and it is not a purpura is wrong it is a purpura. fact18: That this moorwort is a funicular and is a kind of a purpura is incorrect. fact19: That ovary is both not a Erysiphales and a Glinka. fact20: If that that bowline does not execute and is not neurotropic is wrong then that ovary is unrelated. fact21: If that that ovary is unrelated hold it does not commercialize syncategorem and it does not champion hardheartedness. fact22: The fact that that bowline does not execute and is not neurotropic does not hold if the fact that that bowline does not disrupt hold. ; $hypothesis$ = This moorwort juggles. ; $proof$ =

fact10 & fact19 -> int1: That bowline is not a kind of a funicular.; int1 & fact1 -> int2: That this moorwort is a funicular but that person is not a purpura does not hold.; fact3 -> int3: This moorwort juggles if that it is a funicular and it is not a kind of a purpura is incorrect.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

Brad is a climb.

{D}{b}

fact1: Something findingses Wheatley if it is fungicidal. fact2: That that dorm is not non-fungicidal hold. fact3: If this prosimian disembarks then this prosimian is believable. fact4: There exists something such that that is believable and/or that is navigational. fact5: If the fact that that larvacean is a marbled is correct then the fact that that schizopetalon is Democratic thing that is not a gustation does not hold. fact6: That Brad does not findings Wheatley but this one is a climb is incorrect if Brad is fungicidal. fact7: If that schizopetalon does not disembark this blossom is not uxorial but it is believable. fact8: If the fact that this roomie is fungicidal but it is not navigational hold then Brad is a climb. fact9: If someone is not non-believable this roomie is not navigational. fact10: That some man is a climb and findingses Wheatley does not hold if it is not fungicidal. fact11: The counterman is a kind of a hemianopia that does not findings Wheatley. fact12: This roomie findingses Wheatley. fact13: this Wheatley findingses roomie. fact14: If there exists something such that the thing is believable or is non-navigational or both then this roomie is not non-navigational. fact15: The sissu is a climb. fact16: If this roomie does findings Wheatley then it is fungicidal. fact17: If this roomie is not believable then Brad is both fungicidal and navigational. fact18: If the fact that the fact that that schizopetalon is both not non-Democratic and not a gustation is correct does not hold then that schizopetalon does not disembark. fact19: If there exists something such that either it is fungicidal or it is not a climb or both this roomie is not a climb. fact20: Something is believable and/or not navigational. fact21: Something is not a kind of a climb if that it does not findings Wheatley and is a climb is wrong.

fact1: (x): {B}x -> {A}x fact2: {B}{gk} fact3: {F}{he} -> {E}{he} fact4: (Ex): ({E}x v {C}x) fact5: {J}{e} -> ¬({H}{d} & ¬{I}{d}) fact6: {B}{b} -> ¬(¬{A}{b} & {D}{b}) fact7: ¬{F}{d} -> (¬{G}{c} & {E}{c}) fact8: ({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> {D}{b} fact9: (x): {E}x -> ¬{C}{a} fact10: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬({D}x & {A}x) fact11: ({AK}{fc} & ¬{A}{fc}) fact12: {A}{a} fact13: {AA}{aa} fact14: (x): ({E}x v ¬{C}x) -> ¬{C}{a} fact15: {D}{gs} fact16: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} fact17: ¬{E}{a} -> ({B}{b} & {C}{b}) fact18: ¬({H}{d} & ¬{I}{d}) -> ¬{F}{d} fact19: (x): ({B}x v ¬{D}x) -> ¬{D}{a} fact20: (Ex): ({E}x v ¬{C}x) fact21: (x): ¬(¬{A}x & {D}x) -> ¬{D}x

This prosimian does findings Wheatley.

{A}{he}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Something findingses Wheatley if it is fungicidal. fact2: That that dorm is not non-fungicidal hold. fact3: If this prosimian disembarks then this prosimian is believable. fact4: There exists something such that that is believable and/or that is navigational. fact5: If the fact that that larvacean is a marbled is correct then the fact that that schizopetalon is Democratic thing that is not a gustation does not hold. fact6: That Brad does not findings Wheatley but this one is a climb is incorrect if Brad is fungicidal. fact7: If that schizopetalon does not disembark this blossom is not uxorial but it is believable. fact8: If the fact that this roomie is fungicidal but it is not navigational hold then Brad is a climb. fact9: If someone is not non-believable this roomie is not navigational. fact10: That some man is a climb and findingses Wheatley does not hold if it is not fungicidal. fact11: The counterman is a kind of a hemianopia that does not findings Wheatley. fact12: This roomie findingses Wheatley. fact13: this Wheatley findingses roomie. fact14: If there exists something such that the thing is believable or is non-navigational or both then this roomie is not non-navigational. fact15: The sissu is a climb. fact16: If this roomie does findings Wheatley then it is fungicidal. fact17: If this roomie is not believable then Brad is both fungicidal and navigational. fact18: If the fact that the fact that that schizopetalon is both not non-Democratic and not a gustation is correct does not hold then that schizopetalon does not disembark. fact19: If there exists something such that either it is fungicidal or it is not a climb or both this roomie is not a climb. fact20: Something is believable and/or not navigational. fact21: Something is not a kind of a climb if that it does not findings Wheatley and is a climb is wrong. ; $hypothesis$ = Brad is a climb. ; $proof$ =

fact16 & fact12 -> int1: This roomie is fungicidal.; fact20 & fact14 -> int2: This roomie is non-navigational.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This roomie is fungicidal but it is not navigational.; int3 & fact8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That that husking and this cryptogamousness occurs is false.

¬({A} & {C})

fact1: This cryptogamousness occurs if that particularisation happens. fact2: That both that husking and this cryptogamousness occurs is wrong if this evidentiariness does not occurs. fact3: That that kindness does not occurs is false if the fact that this evidentiariness does not occurs and that husking happens does not hold. fact4: That husking happens if this evidentiariness happens. fact5: That tackling More occurs. fact6: If that depositing Cincinnati happens then the rattling occurs. fact7: That that ordinalness happens triggers that that mellowing does not happens but that recusal occurs. fact8: If this nosing fallen does not occurs then that beano does not happens and/or that punctilio does not occurs. fact9: That this nosing fallen does not happens and this nonthermalness does not occurs is triggered by this deliverance. fact10: If that chewing does not occurs then this evidentiariness occurs. fact11: That mellowing occurs. fact12: If that mellowing does not occurs the fact that notthat particularisation but this cryptogamousness occurs does not hold. fact13: Notthat embedding but that ordinalness occurs if this schismaticness does not occurs. fact14: If this cryptogamousness does not occurs that this evidentiariness does not occurs and that husking happens is wrong. fact15: That prescriptiveness occurs. fact16: That somnambulation happens and that titivation occurs. fact17: That particularisation does not occurs and this evidentiariness does not happens if that mellowing does not happens. fact18: That recusal but notthat mellowing occurs if that ordinalness happens. fact19: The fact that the overheating and the caravanning happens hold. fact20: If the insurrectionariness happens that parching troupe happens. fact21: The fact that that notthe axialness but that chewing happens is correct does not hold. fact22: If that this non-axialness and that chewing occurs is false this evidentiariness happens.

fact1: {D} -> {C} fact2: ¬{B} -> ¬({A} & {C}) fact3: ¬(¬{B} & {A}) -> {HM} fact4: {B} -> {A} fact5: {BJ} fact6: {CH} -> {IA} fact7: {G} -> (¬{E} & {F}) fact8: ¬{L} -> (¬{K} v ¬{J}) fact9: {N} -> (¬{L} & ¬{M}) fact10: ¬{AB} -> {B} fact11: {E} fact12: ¬{E} -> ¬(¬{D} & {C}) fact13: ¬{I} -> (¬{H} & {G}) fact14: ¬{C} -> ¬(¬{B} & {A}) fact15: {CL} fact16: ({BS} & {HK}) fact17: ¬{E} -> (¬{D} & ¬{B}) fact18: {G} -> ({F} & ¬{E}) fact19: ({EB} & {FH}) fact20: {AJ} -> {II} fact21: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) fact22: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) -> {B}

That kindness happens.

{HM}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This cryptogamousness occurs if that particularisation happens. fact2: That both that husking and this cryptogamousness occurs is wrong if this evidentiariness does not occurs. fact3: That that kindness does not occurs is false if the fact that this evidentiariness does not occurs and that husking happens does not hold. fact4: That husking happens if this evidentiariness happens. fact5: That tackling More occurs. fact6: If that depositing Cincinnati happens then the rattling occurs. fact7: That that ordinalness happens triggers that that mellowing does not happens but that recusal occurs. fact8: If this nosing fallen does not occurs then that beano does not happens and/or that punctilio does not occurs. fact9: That this nosing fallen does not happens and this nonthermalness does not occurs is triggered by this deliverance. fact10: If that chewing does not occurs then this evidentiariness occurs. fact11: That mellowing occurs. fact12: If that mellowing does not occurs the fact that notthat particularisation but this cryptogamousness occurs does not hold. fact13: Notthat embedding but that ordinalness occurs if this schismaticness does not occurs. fact14: If this cryptogamousness does not occurs that this evidentiariness does not occurs and that husking happens is wrong. fact15: That prescriptiveness occurs. fact16: That somnambulation happens and that titivation occurs. fact17: That particularisation does not occurs and this evidentiariness does not happens if that mellowing does not happens. fact18: That recusal but notthat mellowing occurs if that ordinalness happens. fact19: The fact that the overheating and the caravanning happens hold. fact20: If the insurrectionariness happens that parching troupe happens. fact21: The fact that that notthe axialness but that chewing happens is correct does not hold. fact22: If that this non-axialness and that chewing occurs is false this evidentiariness happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That that husking and this cryptogamousness occurs is false. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This floodhead does not happens.

¬{C}

fact1: The mouthing happens. fact2: That this veterinary prevents that this activity does not occurs is true. fact3: This sparking happens if the reasoning superfluity occurs. fact4: The Rastafarianness occurs. fact5: If this masonicness does not occurs then this pauperising swept but notthis blaring occurs. fact6: If this chartering dyscrasia happens then both that goneness and this non-agrobiologicness occurs. fact7: This masonicness does not occurs if that catoptricness but notthe slugfest happens. fact8: This chartering dyscrasia occurs and that universalisticness occurs if this blaring does not happens. fact9: The homocentricness and that rebating Laportea happens. fact10: If that cleaving happens the fact that this floodhead happens hold. fact11: The accompaniment occurs. fact12: If that shedding occurs then the alternateness does not happens and this Marching touchstone does not happens. fact13: The digging occurs and this picking occurs. fact14: If that this Marching touchstone does not occurs is true then that cleaving and/or this non-Bolshevikness occurs. fact15: If this valuing occurs the alexic happens. fact16: If the fact that this agrobiologicness does not occurs is true then that shedding and this philhelleneness occurs. fact17: Both the aggravating and the phoning Braille occurs. fact18: The reordering flavoursomeness happens. fact19: That catoptricness occurs and the slugfest does not occurs.

fact1: {AF} fact2: {CN} -> {BG} fact3: {FH} -> {HE} fact4: {CU} fact5: ¬{N} -> ({M} & ¬{L}) fact6: {J} -> ({I} & ¬{H}) fact7: ({P} & ¬{O}) -> ¬{N} fact8: ¬{L} -> ({J} & {K}) fact9: ({DN} & {FS}) fact10: {A} -> {C} fact11: {JC} fact12: {F} -> (¬{E} & ¬{D}) fact13: ({AL} & {DU}) fact14: ¬{D} -> ({A} v ¬{B}) fact15: {ES} -> {FF} fact16: ¬{H} -> ({F} & {G}) fact17: ({AK} & {IA}) fact18: {IO} fact19: ({P} & ¬{O})

This floodhead does not happens.

¬{C}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The mouthing happens. fact2: That this veterinary prevents that this activity does not occurs is true. fact3: This sparking happens if the reasoning superfluity occurs. fact4: The Rastafarianness occurs. fact5: If this masonicness does not occurs then this pauperising swept but notthis blaring occurs. fact6: If this chartering dyscrasia happens then both that goneness and this non-agrobiologicness occurs. fact7: This masonicness does not occurs if that catoptricness but notthe slugfest happens. fact8: This chartering dyscrasia occurs and that universalisticness occurs if this blaring does not happens. fact9: The homocentricness and that rebating Laportea happens. fact10: If that cleaving happens the fact that this floodhead happens hold. fact11: The accompaniment occurs. fact12: If that shedding occurs then the alternateness does not happens and this Marching touchstone does not happens. fact13: The digging occurs and this picking occurs. fact14: If that this Marching touchstone does not occurs is true then that cleaving and/or this non-Bolshevikness occurs. fact15: If this valuing occurs the alexic happens. fact16: If the fact that this agrobiologicness does not occurs is true then that shedding and this philhelleneness occurs. fact17: Both the aggravating and the phoning Braille occurs. fact18: The reordering flavoursomeness happens. fact19: That catoptricness occurs and the slugfest does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = This floodhead does not happens. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This whooper is parous but it is not infinitival.

({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a})

fact1: That the simoom is a psychobabble and/or this is a Bai does not hold if this valuator is not fibrocalcific. fact2: The fact that something is a Homarus and/or that thing is a kind of a suspense is not correct if that thing is not a foul. fact3: This whooper is non-infinitival. fact4: If that thiobacteria is not anterior that plasmacyte is not a foul but he/she is cooler. fact5: This whooper is ungeared but that thing is not a seaworthiness. fact6: That thiobacteria is not anterior if the fact that either the simoom is a psychobabble or it is a Bai or both is wrong. fact7: That pullulation is infinitival. fact8: This whooper garnishes itch but it is not undemocratic. fact9: If that palisade is not a suspense then that this whooper is parous but the one is not infinitival is incorrect. fact10: If the fact that that plasmacyte is a Homarus or the thing is a suspense or both is wrong then that palisade is not a suspense. fact11: Some person is rocky but it is not a ruled if it is not a suspense. fact12: This whooper is a fence. fact13: This whooper is mucose but it is not infinitival. fact14: The handgrip is a indistinguishability but the thing is not parous. fact15: This whooper is parous but it is not infinitival.

fact1: ¬{H}{f} -> ¬({G}{e} v {F}{e}) fact2: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬({C}x v {A}x) fact3: ¬{AB}{a} fact4: ¬{E}{d} -> (¬{B}{c} & {D}{c}) fact5: ({HG}{a} & ¬{HB}{a}) fact6: ¬({G}{e} v {F}{e}) -> ¬{E}{d} fact7: {AB}{g} fact8: ({AM}{a} & ¬{EN}{a}) fact9: ¬{A}{b} -> ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact10: ¬({C}{c} v {A}{c}) -> ¬{A}{b} fact11: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({BF}x & ¬{IQ}x) fact12: {IS}{a} fact13: ({HO}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact14: ({HU}{ed} & ¬{AA}{ed}) fact15: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a})

That Malian is rocky and is not a ruled.

({BF}{io} & ¬{IQ}{io})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That the simoom is a psychobabble and/or this is a Bai does not hold if this valuator is not fibrocalcific. fact2: The fact that something is a Homarus and/or that thing is a kind of a suspense is not correct if that thing is not a foul. fact3: This whooper is non-infinitival. fact4: If that thiobacteria is not anterior that plasmacyte is not a foul but he/she is cooler. fact5: This whooper is ungeared but that thing is not a seaworthiness. fact6: That thiobacteria is not anterior if the fact that either the simoom is a psychobabble or it is a Bai or both is wrong. fact7: That pullulation is infinitival. fact8: This whooper garnishes itch but it is not undemocratic. fact9: If that palisade is not a suspense then that this whooper is parous but the one is not infinitival is incorrect. fact10: If the fact that that plasmacyte is a Homarus or the thing is a suspense or both is wrong then that palisade is not a suspense. fact11: Some person is rocky but it is not a ruled if it is not a suspense. fact12: This whooper is a fence. fact13: This whooper is mucose but it is not infinitival. fact14: The handgrip is a indistinguishability but the thing is not parous. fact15: This whooper is parous but it is not infinitival. ; $hypothesis$ = This whooper is parous but it is not infinitival. ; $proof$ =

fact15 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That crewelwork is not a quote.

¬{B}{aa}

fact1: Some person is not a quote if it is not ungenerous. fact2: The fact that that crewelwork is not uninquisitive and/or he solidifies clientage does not hold if he is ungenerous. fact3: The macadamia is ungenerous. fact4: If that cancer does not concentrate Dasyatidae then that either that cancer is non-valvular or it is unitary or both is false. fact5: If the fact that something is not uninquisitive or solidifies clientage or both does not hold then it is a quote. fact6: That crewelwork is humbling. fact7: That crewelwork does not solidify clientage. fact8: That crewelwork is not ungenerous if the fact that this podium is nonaged and/or it is ungenerous is false. fact9: That cancer is not a exordium if the fact that either it is not valvular or it is unitary or both is incorrect. fact10: If something is a NSWC then that it is nonaged and/or it is not ungenerous does not hold. fact11: If that crewelwork is ungenerous then this does not solidify clientage.

fact1: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬{B}x fact2: {A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) fact3: {A}{i} fact4: ¬{I}{b} -> ¬(¬{H}{b} v {G}{b}) fact5: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x v {AB}x) -> {B}x fact6: {P}{aa} fact7: ¬{AB}{aa} fact8: ¬({D}{a} v ¬{A}{a}) -> ¬{A}{aa} fact9: ¬(¬{H}{b} v {G}{b}) -> ¬{F}{b} fact10: (x): {C}x -> ¬({D}x v ¬{A}x) fact11: {A}{aa} -> ¬{AB}{aa}

That crewelwork is not a quote.

¬{B}{aa}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Some person is not a quote if it is not ungenerous. fact2: The fact that that crewelwork is not uninquisitive and/or he solidifies clientage does not hold if he is ungenerous. fact3: The macadamia is ungenerous. fact4: If that cancer does not concentrate Dasyatidae then that either that cancer is non-valvular or it is unitary or both is false. fact5: If the fact that something is not uninquisitive or solidifies clientage or both does not hold then it is a quote. fact6: That crewelwork is humbling. fact7: That crewelwork does not solidify clientage. fact8: That crewelwork is not ungenerous if the fact that this podium is nonaged and/or it is ungenerous is false. fact9: That cancer is not a exordium if the fact that either it is not valvular or it is unitary or both is incorrect. fact10: If something is a NSWC then that it is nonaged and/or it is not ungenerous does not hold. fact11: If that crewelwork is ungenerous then this does not solidify clientage. ; $hypothesis$ = That crewelwork is not a quote. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That this Attacapan is a kind of a chelonian is right.

{C}{b}

fact1: This pavior is not a kind of a chelonian. fact2: Something is non-xeric and is not branchiate if it is not a Asteraceae. fact3: If this pavior is not a Asteraceae and not an excerpt this Attacapan is not a chelonian. fact4: This pavior is not insignificant and that person does not blue draped. fact5: If the fact that something is not a chelonian and not an excerpt does not hold it is not a Asteraceae. fact6: The involution does not affix Luxemburg and the person is not an excerpt. fact7: If this pavior is a kind of a chelonian this Attacapan is a kind of a chelonian. fact8: The fact that this pavior is not a kind of a chelonian if this Attacapan is not an excerpt and it is not a Asteraceae is true. fact9: This pavior is not a kind of an excerpt. fact10: This pavior is not a Asteraceae if this Attacapan is not a chelonian and it is not an excerpt. fact11: The fact that somebody is not an excerpt and it is not a Asteraceae does not hold if it does shack nada. fact12: If that that ratan is both not an excerpt and not a Asteraceae does not hold that this pavior is a chelonian hold. fact13: That coprolith does not shack nada if that coprolith is not a quest and is antipollution. fact14: That that prechlorination is a chelonian does not hold. fact15: This pavior is not a Asteraceae.

fact1: ¬{C}{a} fact2: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x & ¬{AR}x) fact3: (¬{A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> ¬{C}{b} fact4: (¬{JC}{a} & ¬{I}{a}) fact5: (x): ¬(¬{C}x & ¬{B}x) -> ¬{A}x fact6: (¬{DQ}{gk} & ¬{B}{gk}) fact7: {C}{a} -> {C}{b} fact8: (¬{B}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) -> ¬{C}{a} fact9: ¬{B}{a} fact10: (¬{C}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) -> ¬{A}{a} fact11: (x): {D}x -> ¬(¬{B}x & ¬{A}x) fact12: ¬(¬{B}{c} & ¬{A}{c}) -> {C}{a} fact13: (¬{F}{el} & {E}{el}) -> ¬{D}{el} fact14: ¬{C}{bd} fact15: ¬{A}{a}

That coprolith is both not xeric and not branchiate.

(¬{AA}{el} & ¬{AR}{el})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This pavior is not a kind of a chelonian. fact2: Something is non-xeric and is not branchiate if it is not a Asteraceae. fact3: If this pavior is not a Asteraceae and not an excerpt this Attacapan is not a chelonian. fact4: This pavior is not insignificant and that person does not blue draped. fact5: If the fact that something is not a chelonian and not an excerpt does not hold it is not a Asteraceae. fact6: The involution does not affix Luxemburg and the person is not an excerpt. fact7: If this pavior is a kind of a chelonian this Attacapan is a kind of a chelonian. fact8: The fact that this pavior is not a kind of a chelonian if this Attacapan is not an excerpt and it is not a Asteraceae is true. fact9: This pavior is not a kind of an excerpt. fact10: This pavior is not a Asteraceae if this Attacapan is not a chelonian and it is not an excerpt. fact11: The fact that somebody is not an excerpt and it is not a Asteraceae does not hold if it does shack nada. fact12: If that that ratan is both not an excerpt and not a Asteraceae does not hold that this pavior is a chelonian hold. fact13: That coprolith does not shack nada if that coprolith is not a quest and is antipollution. fact14: That that prechlorination is a chelonian does not hold. fact15: This pavior is not a Asteraceae. ; $hypothesis$ = That this Attacapan is a kind of a chelonian is right. ; $proof$ =

fact15 & fact9 -> int1: This pavior is not a kind of a Asteraceae and it is not a kind of an excerpt.; int1 & fact3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That notthis trephining Ancylus but this chiliasticness happens is false.

¬(¬{AA} & {AB})

fact1: That the incidentness does not occurs brings about that notthe erring Hibernia but this informationalness happens. fact2: The fact that this encasement does not occurs is right. fact3: Notthis trephining Ancylus but this chiliasticness occurs if this encasement does not occurs.

fact1: ¬{CM} -> (¬{DR} & {BN}) fact2: ¬{A} fact3: ¬{A} -> (¬{AA} & {AB})

DISPROVED

DISPROVED

$facts$ = fact1: That the incidentness does not occurs brings about that notthe erring Hibernia but this informationalness happens. fact2: The fact that this encasement does not occurs is right. fact3: Notthis trephining Ancylus but this chiliasticness occurs if this encasement does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That notthis trephining Ancylus but this chiliasticness happens is false. ; $proof$ =

fact3 & fact2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This binauralness does not occurs.

¬{B}

fact1: The pluming happens. fact2: The spitting does not occurs and that outsailing strained does not occurs if that elegantness occurs. fact3: That notthe absenting Tichodroma but that cryptogamicness occurs is wrong. fact4: This binauralness happens if that the absenting Tichodroma does not occurs but that cryptogamicness occurs does not hold. fact5: That this hoofinging Myaceae does not occurs is prevented by that the spitting does not occurs and that outsailing strained does not happens. fact6: That that notthe bracing but that stunting happens is incorrect hold. fact7: If both this hoofinging Myaceae and that non-concaveness occurs this binauralness does not happens. fact8: This binauralness happens if that cryptogamicness does not occurs.

fact1: {IN} fact2: {G} -> (¬{E} & ¬{F}) fact3: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) fact4: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) -> {B} fact5: (¬{E} & ¬{F}) -> {C} fact6: ¬(¬{HL} & {EB}) fact7: ({C} & ¬{A}) -> ¬{B} fact8: ¬{AB} -> {B}

This binauralness does not occurs.

¬{B}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The pluming happens. fact2: The spitting does not occurs and that outsailing strained does not occurs if that elegantness occurs. fact3: That notthe absenting Tichodroma but that cryptogamicness occurs is wrong. fact4: This binauralness happens if that the absenting Tichodroma does not occurs but that cryptogamicness occurs does not hold. fact5: That this hoofinging Myaceae does not occurs is prevented by that the spitting does not occurs and that outsailing strained does not happens. fact6: That that notthe bracing but that stunting happens is incorrect hold. fact7: If both this hoofinging Myaceae and that non-concaveness occurs this binauralness does not happens. fact8: This binauralness happens if that cryptogamicness does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = This binauralness does not occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact4 & fact3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This ruining does not occurs.

¬{C}

fact1: That that titillation occurs prevents that this ruining does not happens. fact2: The conducing turbidity happens. fact3: If that maundering thyreophoran happens then the euclidianness occurs. fact4: The programing occurs. fact5: If that housecleaning outraged occurs that secernating RCMP happens. fact6: The avirulentness happens. fact7: If this separating occurs then this ruining happens. fact8: If that that slide does not occurs is correct that that titillation does not happens and this separating does not occurs is false. fact9: That affray is triggered by that the diluting happens. fact10: This inquisition occurs. fact11: That that spermicidalness occurs is caused by that this cubitalness happens. fact12: The wetting or the patient or both occurs.

fact1: {B} -> {C} fact2: {AE} fact3: {GT} -> {IE} fact4: {GN} fact5: {FO} -> {GJ} fact6: {ET} fact7: {A} -> {C} fact8: ¬{D} -> ¬(¬{B} & ¬{A}) fact9: {DP} -> {BS} fact10: {GM} fact11: {CC} -> {JE} fact12: ({BQ} v {HD})

This ruining does not occurs.

¬{C}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That that titillation occurs prevents that this ruining does not happens. fact2: The conducing turbidity happens. fact3: If that maundering thyreophoran happens then the euclidianness occurs. fact4: The programing occurs. fact5: If that housecleaning outraged occurs that secernating RCMP happens. fact6: The avirulentness happens. fact7: If this separating occurs then this ruining happens. fact8: If that that slide does not occurs is correct that that titillation does not happens and this separating does not occurs is false. fact9: That affray is triggered by that the diluting happens. fact10: This inquisition occurs. fact11: That that spermicidalness occurs is caused by that this cubitalness happens. fact12: The wetting or the patient or both occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = This ruining does not occurs. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

Asia is not a opisthotonos.

¬{C}{a}

fact1: Asia is not a opisthotonos if the fact that this welt is a kind of a opisthotonos hold. fact2: Asia does presage obituary. fact3: If Asia is not a vacuolization then it is a Balzac and it hovers attribution. fact4: The vernix presages obituary. fact5: Asia is not a vacuolization. fact6: Asia is parabolical and this presages obituary. fact7: If someone is a Balzac then he/she is not a kind of a dowse and he/she is unreliable. fact8: That Paranthropus is a kind of a Balzac if Asia is a Balzac. fact9: If someone is parabolical then the fact that this one is a kind of a opisthotonos is right. fact10: If that Paranthropus is not a dowse then that Paranthropus is a opisthotonos and it does presage obituary.

fact1: {C}{b} -> ¬{C}{a} fact2: {B}{a} fact3: ¬{H}{a} -> ({F}{a} & {G}{a}) fact4: {B}{gt} fact5: ¬{H}{a} fact6: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact7: (x): {F}x -> (¬{D}x & {E}x) fact8: {F}{a} -> {F}{cu} fact9: (x): {A}x -> {C}x fact10: ¬{D}{cu} -> ({C}{cu} & {B}{cu})

Asia is not a opisthotonos.

¬{C}{a}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Asia is not a opisthotonos if the fact that this welt is a kind of a opisthotonos hold. fact2: Asia does presage obituary. fact3: If Asia is not a vacuolization then it is a Balzac and it hovers attribution. fact4: The vernix presages obituary. fact5: Asia is not a vacuolization. fact6: Asia is parabolical and this presages obituary. fact7: If someone is a Balzac then he/she is not a kind of a dowse and he/she is unreliable. fact8: That Paranthropus is a kind of a Balzac if Asia is a Balzac. fact9: If someone is parabolical then the fact that this one is a kind of a opisthotonos is right. fact10: If that Paranthropus is not a dowse then that Paranthropus is a opisthotonos and it does presage obituary. ; $hypothesis$ = Asia is not a opisthotonos. ; $proof$ =

fact6 -> int1: Asia is parabolical.; fact9 -> int2: If Asia is parabolical then that it is a opisthotonos is right.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This sorter is not a patriarchy or a Mbeya or both.

(¬{AA}{b} v {AB}{b})

fact1: Beatrice is not a Mbeya. fact2: Everybody does not absent Numidinae and/or is not a kind of a Sedna. fact3: If this sorter is not a kind of a caskful then Beatrice either is not a Mbeya or is a patriarchy or both. fact4: If Beatrice is not a caskful then either this sorter is not a kind of a patriarchy or that is a Mbeya or both. fact5: Someone is a kind of a state if it is not a Sedna. fact6: That echinococcus is not a kind of a Mbeya. fact7: This sorter is non-exogenic. fact8: This conger is not a caskful. fact9: This sorter is not a Mbeya or it is a caskful or both. fact10: This sorter fits OED and/or is a caskful. fact11: This sorter is a patriarchy or it is a caskful or both. fact12: Beatrice is not a patriarchy or it is a kind of a caskful or both. fact13: Beatrice is not a caskful. fact14: The plowboy is not a kind of a patriarchy. fact15: Beatrice is a Mbeya and/or this thing is a patriarchy if the fact that this sorter is not a caskful is correct. fact16: This sorter is a patriarchy and/or a Mbeya if Beatrice is not a kind of a caskful. fact17: If Beatrice is a caskful then that this sorter is not a kind of a patriarchy and/or it is a Mbeya is wrong. fact18: This sorter is not a Mbeya and/or is a caskful if Beatrice is not a patriarchy.

fact1: ¬{AB}{a} fact2: (x): (¬{D}x v ¬{B}x) fact3: ¬{A}{b} -> (¬{AB}{a} v {AA}{a}) fact4: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{b} v {AB}{b}) fact5: (x): ¬{B}x -> {C}x fact6: ¬{AB}{er} fact7: ¬{GL}{b} fact8: ¬{A}{dg} fact9: (¬{AB}{b} v {A}{b}) fact10: ({CQ}{b} v {A}{b}) fact11: ({AA}{b} v {A}{b}) fact12: (¬{AA}{a} v {A}{a}) fact13: ¬{A}{a} fact14: ¬{AA}{dd} fact15: ¬{A}{b} -> ({AB}{a} v {AA}{a}) fact16: ¬{A}{a} -> ({AA}{b} v {AB}{b}) fact17: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} v {AB}{b}) fact18: ¬{AA}{a} -> (¬{AB}{b} v {A}{b})

That this sorter is not a patriarchy or that thing is a Mbeya or both does not hold.

¬(¬{AA}{b} v {AB}{b})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Beatrice is not a Mbeya. fact2: Everybody does not absent Numidinae and/or is not a kind of a Sedna. fact3: If this sorter is not a kind of a caskful then Beatrice either is not a Mbeya or is a patriarchy or both. fact4: If Beatrice is not a caskful then either this sorter is not a kind of a patriarchy or that is a Mbeya or both. fact5: Someone is a kind of a state if it is not a Sedna. fact6: That echinococcus is not a kind of a Mbeya. fact7: This sorter is non-exogenic. fact8: This conger is not a caskful. fact9: This sorter is not a Mbeya or it is a caskful or both. fact10: This sorter fits OED and/or is a caskful. fact11: This sorter is a patriarchy or it is a caskful or both. fact12: Beatrice is not a patriarchy or it is a kind of a caskful or both. fact13: Beatrice is not a caskful. fact14: The plowboy is not a kind of a patriarchy. fact15: Beatrice is a Mbeya and/or this thing is a patriarchy if the fact that this sorter is not a caskful is correct. fact16: This sorter is a patriarchy and/or a Mbeya if Beatrice is not a kind of a caskful. fact17: If Beatrice is a caskful then that this sorter is not a kind of a patriarchy and/or it is a Mbeya is wrong. fact18: This sorter is not a Mbeya and/or is a caskful if Beatrice is not a patriarchy. ; $hypothesis$ = This sorter is not a patriarchy or a Mbeya or both. ; $proof$ =

fact4 & fact13 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

The fact that that bap is not phrenological hold.

¬{B}{c}

fact1: If that secretor is not phrenological then that bap is alchemical and it is phrenological. fact2: That that bap does not allowance Alborg but it is phrenological is wrong if this cytol is not alchemical. fact3: That that secretor informs preference hold. fact4: If that secretor is not phrenological that bap is alchemical. fact5: If that some person does not allowance Alborg and is phrenological is incorrect then it is phrenological. fact6: That bap is alchemical. fact7: That bap is non-cognitive. fact8: The fact that this cytol is phrenological and it informs preference is correct if that secretor does not informs preference. fact9: The fang is alchemical. fact10: That secretor is not phrenological if that this cytol informs preference and is cognitive is false. fact11: That bap incurvates Sion. fact12: The fact that this cytol informs preference and it is cognitive is false. fact13: If this cytol does not inform preference then that that secretor is not phrenological is true. fact14: This cytol is phrenological. fact15: If that secretor either is not microeconomic or is not alchemical or both then this cytol is not alchemical. fact16: If someone is a Rhoeadales then he/she is non-microeconomic and/or is not alchemical.

fact1: ¬{B}{b} -> ({C}{c} & {B}{c}) fact2: ¬{C}{a} -> ¬(¬{A}{c} & {B}{c}) fact3: {AA}{b} fact4: ¬{B}{b} -> {C}{c} fact5: (x): ¬(¬{A}x & {B}x) -> ¬{B}x fact6: {C}{c} fact7: ¬{AB}{c} fact8: ¬{AA}{b} -> ({B}{a} & {AA}{a}) fact9: {C}{fo} fact10: ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact11: {Q}{c} fact12: ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact13: ¬{AA}{a} -> ¬{B}{b} fact14: {B}{a} fact15: (¬{E}{b} v ¬{C}{b}) -> ¬{C}{a} fact16: (x): {D}x -> (¬{E}x v ¬{C}x)

The fact that that bap is not phrenological hold.

¬{B}{c}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that secretor is not phrenological then that bap is alchemical and it is phrenological. fact2: That that bap does not allowance Alborg but it is phrenological is wrong if this cytol is not alchemical. fact3: That that secretor informs preference hold. fact4: If that secretor is not phrenological that bap is alchemical. fact5: If that some person does not allowance Alborg and is phrenological is incorrect then it is phrenological. fact6: That bap is alchemical. fact7: That bap is non-cognitive. fact8: The fact that this cytol is phrenological and it informs preference is correct if that secretor does not informs preference. fact9: The fang is alchemical. fact10: That secretor is not phrenological if that this cytol informs preference and is cognitive is false. fact11: That bap incurvates Sion. fact12: The fact that this cytol informs preference and it is cognitive is false. fact13: If this cytol does not inform preference then that that secretor is not phrenological is true. fact14: This cytol is phrenological. fact15: If that secretor either is not microeconomic or is not alchemical or both then this cytol is not alchemical. fact16: If someone is a Rhoeadales then he/she is non-microeconomic and/or is not alchemical. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that bap is not phrenological hold. ; $proof$ =

fact10 & fact12 -> int1: That secretor is not phrenological.; int1 & fact1 -> int2: That bap is both not non-alchemical and phrenological.; int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This fratricide is Hugoesque.

{A}{a}

fact1: Something is not Hugoesque if the fact that it tans Phalangium and is Hugoesque is false. fact2: Something tans Phalangium and is Hugoesque if that it is not a kind of a Hernaria is not wrong. fact3: The leporide is not non-Hugoesque. fact4: This fratricide is a kind of a bravery. fact5: The Kaiser is Hugoesque. fact6: This Rastafarian is Hugoesque. fact7: If Felicia is not a Hernaria then the fact that this fratricide tans Phalangium and this person is Hugoesque does not hold. fact8: This fratricide is Hugoesque.

fact1: (x): ¬({B}x & {A}x) -> ¬{A}x fact2: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({B}x & {A}x) fact3: {A}{hh} fact4: {BK}{a} fact5: {A}{hj} fact6: {A}{hf} fact7: ¬{C}{b} -> ¬({B}{a} & {A}{a}) fact8: {A}{a}

This fratricide is not Hugoesque.

¬{A}{a}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Something is not Hugoesque if the fact that it tans Phalangium and is Hugoesque is false. fact2: Something tans Phalangium and is Hugoesque if that it is not a kind of a Hernaria is not wrong. fact3: The leporide is not non-Hugoesque. fact4: This fratricide is a kind of a bravery. fact5: The Kaiser is Hugoesque. fact6: This Rastafarian is Hugoesque. fact7: If Felicia is not a Hernaria then the fact that this fratricide tans Phalangium and this person is Hugoesque does not hold. fact8: This fratricide is Hugoesque. ; $hypothesis$ = This fratricide is Hugoesque. ; $proof$ =

fact8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That this sphingid is not a disarray and it is not a byword does not hold.

¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a})

fact1: Something is not a Tirana and is not a kind of a clot if it does not rack. fact2: Something is a kind of a Artamus if it crenels. fact3: If this sphingid does not lessen armful then it does not abominate tidiness and it does not add Caprimulgidae. fact4: This sphingid is not a kind of a disarray and is not a byword if the fact that this sphingid is not a kind of a Artamus is correct. fact5: This sphingid is not undiluted and it is not a Mithra. fact6: That torte does not defeat laudableness and is not a thrilled. fact7: That myrrh is not cerous and not a Artamus. fact8: This sphingid is not a byword. fact9: Everyone does not rack. fact10: This sphingid is not a Artamus. fact11: The delegate is not a Artamus. fact12: The picknicker is not a kind of a byword. fact13: The fact that someone is not a disarray and is not a byword does not hold if that one is a kind of a Artamus. fact14: If this sphingid is not a kind of a Artamus it is not a byword. fact15: Somebody does accord and she/he trounces verdancy if she/he is not a kind of a clot. fact16: This sphingid does not dislodge testimony and does not thicken syncategorem.

fact1: (x): ¬{G}x -> (¬{F}x & ¬{E}x) fact2: (x): {B}x -> {A}x fact3: ¬{FI}{a} -> (¬{JD}{a} & ¬{BH}{a}) fact4: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact5: (¬{GF}{a} & ¬{IC}{a}) fact6: (¬{S}{eq} & ¬{JI}{eq}) fact7: (¬{CJ}{do} & ¬{A}{do}) fact8: ¬{AB}{a} fact9: (x): ¬{G}x fact10: ¬{A}{a} fact11: ¬{A}{ci} fact12: ¬{AB}{ai} fact13: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact14: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{AB}{a} fact15: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({C}x & {D}x) fact16: (¬{AP}{a} & ¬{FS}{a})

That this sphingid is not a disarray and it is not a byword does not hold.

¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Something is not a Tirana and is not a kind of a clot if it does not rack. fact2: Something is a kind of a Artamus if it crenels. fact3: If this sphingid does not lessen armful then it does not abominate tidiness and it does not add Caprimulgidae. fact4: This sphingid is not a kind of a disarray and is not a byword if the fact that this sphingid is not a kind of a Artamus is correct. fact5: This sphingid is not undiluted and it is not a Mithra. fact6: That torte does not defeat laudableness and is not a thrilled. fact7: That myrrh is not cerous and not a Artamus. fact8: This sphingid is not a byword. fact9: Everyone does not rack. fact10: This sphingid is not a Artamus. fact11: The delegate is not a Artamus. fact12: The picknicker is not a kind of a byword. fact13: The fact that someone is not a disarray and is not a byword does not hold if that one is a kind of a Artamus. fact14: If this sphingid is not a kind of a Artamus it is not a byword. fact15: Somebody does accord and she/he trounces verdancy if she/he is not a kind of a clot. fact16: This sphingid does not dislodge testimony and does not thicken syncategorem. ; $hypothesis$ = That this sphingid is not a disarray and it is not a byword does not hold. ; $proof$ =

fact4 & fact10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That Bj is geodesical and/or it is not profound does not hold.

¬({A}{b} v ¬{C}{b})

fact1: Bj is a kind of a Taiwan if this enantiomer does not lexicalized l and is uncollected. fact2: If this enantiomer is a Taiwan then the fact that Bj is either not non-geodesical or not profound or both is wrong. fact3: The fact that this enantiomer does not lexicalized l and is uncollected is right. fact4: If this uke is a Tacca that this enantiomer is a kind of a NAWCWPNS but it is not capitalistic does not hold. fact5: If the fact that somebody is both a NAWCWPNS and not capitalistic is false then it is a kind of a Taiwan. fact6: Something is geodesical and/or it is non-profound if it is a Taiwan.

fact1: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} fact2: {B}{a} -> ¬({A}{b} v ¬{C}{b}) fact3: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact4: {F}{c} -> ¬({E}{a} & ¬{D}{a}) fact5: (x): ¬({E}x & ¬{D}x) -> {B}x fact6: (x): {B}x -> ({A}x v ¬{C}x)

That Bj is geodesical and/or it is not profound does not hold.

¬({A}{b} v ¬{C}{b})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Bj is a kind of a Taiwan if this enantiomer does not lexicalized l and is uncollected. fact2: If this enantiomer is a Taiwan then the fact that Bj is either not non-geodesical or not profound or both is wrong. fact3: The fact that this enantiomer does not lexicalized l and is uncollected is right. fact4: If this uke is a Tacca that this enantiomer is a kind of a NAWCWPNS but it is not capitalistic does not hold. fact5: If the fact that somebody is both a NAWCWPNS and not capitalistic is false then it is a kind of a Taiwan. fact6: Something is geodesical and/or it is non-profound if it is a Taiwan. ; $hypothesis$ = That Bj is geodesical and/or it is not profound does not hold. ; $proof$ =

fact1 & fact3 -> int1: Bj is a Taiwan.; fact6 -> int2: Bj is geodesical and/or not profound if Bj is a Taiwan.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This clasping happens.

{B}

fact1: If this curableness does not happens the fact that both this non-chauvinisticness and this clasping occurs is not true. fact2: This chauvinisticness happens. fact3: That this chauvinisticness occurs prevents that this clasping does not occurs.

fact1: ¬{C} -> ¬(¬{A} & {B}) fact2: {A} fact3: {A} -> {B}

This clasping does not happens.

¬{B}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this curableness does not happens the fact that both this non-chauvinisticness and this clasping occurs is not true. fact2: This chauvinisticness happens. fact3: That this chauvinisticness occurs prevents that this clasping does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = This clasping happens. ; $proof$ =

fact3 & fact2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This eyeliner is not autarchic.

¬{C}{c}

fact1: The fact that the fact that this serratus does not better decadency and is not a Philistia is correct does not hold if this whipsaw is a kind of a Ascophyllum. fact2: If this veal is a Philistia this eyeliner is autarchic. fact3: the decadency betters whipsaw. fact4: If somebody is not a Desmidiaceae but it is an abolitionism it is a hypersomnia. fact5: If that this veal does not advect Laplace and is a smooch does not hold this eyeliner is not a Desmidiaceae. fact6: If someone is not a Ascophyllum then it is not a Philistia and it does not better decadency. fact7: That this whipsaw is a seated is not wrong if this whipsaw is a brandish. fact8: If that this whipsaw litters orphanhood or it is not eosinophilic or both is incorrect then the fact that this whipsaw is a brandish is not incorrect. fact9: This whipsaw betters decadency. fact10: If that this whipsaw is autarchic is true then this eyeliner betters decadency. fact11: That zeolite betters decadency. fact12: There is nothing such that the fact that the thing does not advect Laplace and is a smooch is correct. fact13: Some person is not a Ascophyllum if this one is a hypersomnia that is a mutability. fact14: This eyeliner is a kind of an abolitionism that is a kind of a Cheever. fact15: This veal is a Philistia if the fact that this whipsaw betters decadency is not wrong. fact16: If something is not a Philistia and does not better decadency this is not autarchic. fact17: This eyeliner is a kind of a mutability if this whipsaw is a kind of a seated.

fact1: {D}{a} -> ¬(¬{A}{u} & ¬{B}{u}) fact2: {B}{b} -> {C}{c} fact3: {AA}{aa} fact4: (x): (¬{G}x & {H}x) -> {E}x fact5: ¬(¬{M}{b} & {L}{b}) -> ¬{G}{c} fact6: (x): ¬{D}x -> (¬{B}x & ¬{A}x) fact7: {J}{a} -> {I}{a} fact8: ¬({N}{a} v ¬{O}{a}) -> {J}{a} fact9: {A}{a} fact10: {C}{a} -> {A}{c} fact11: {A}{ir} fact12: (x): ¬(¬{M}x & {L}x) fact13: (x): ({E}x & {F}x) -> ¬{D}x fact14: ({H}{c} & {K}{c}) fact15: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} fact16: (x): (¬{B}x & ¬{A}x) -> ¬{C}x fact17: {I}{a} -> {F}{c}

This eyeliner is not autarchic.

¬{C}{c}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that the fact that this serratus does not better decadency and is not a Philistia is correct does not hold if this whipsaw is a kind of a Ascophyllum. fact2: If this veal is a Philistia this eyeliner is autarchic. fact3: the decadency betters whipsaw. fact4: If somebody is not a Desmidiaceae but it is an abolitionism it is a hypersomnia. fact5: If that this veal does not advect Laplace and is a smooch does not hold this eyeliner is not a Desmidiaceae. fact6: If someone is not a Ascophyllum then it is not a Philistia and it does not better decadency. fact7: That this whipsaw is a seated is not wrong if this whipsaw is a brandish. fact8: If that this whipsaw litters orphanhood or it is not eosinophilic or both is incorrect then the fact that this whipsaw is a brandish is not incorrect. fact9: This whipsaw betters decadency. fact10: If that this whipsaw is autarchic is true then this eyeliner betters decadency. fact11: That zeolite betters decadency. fact12: There is nothing such that the fact that the thing does not advect Laplace and is a smooch is correct. fact13: Some person is not a Ascophyllum if this one is a hypersomnia that is a mutability. fact14: This eyeliner is a kind of an abolitionism that is a kind of a Cheever. fact15: This veal is a Philistia if the fact that this whipsaw betters decadency is not wrong. fact16: If something is not a Philistia and does not better decadency this is not autarchic. fact17: This eyeliner is a kind of a mutability if this whipsaw is a kind of a seated. ; $hypothesis$ = This eyeliner is not autarchic. ; $proof$ =

fact15 & fact9 -> int1: This veal is a Philistia.; int1 & fact2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That prig is laurelled and it is spatial.

({A}{aa} & {C}{aa})

fact1: This slicker is a Cichorium. fact2: If this slicker is noxious then this one is not a Cichorium and this one is not spatial. fact3: This slicker is laurelled. fact4: If this slicker is a Cichorium that prig is a Cichorium. fact5: That prig loans Leguminosae. fact6: The fact that that that prig is laurelled and the thing is spatial hold does not hold if this slicker does not loan Leguminosae. fact7: That that langlaufer is a Schumpeter but it is not a kind of a bounded is false if that langlaufer is not a kind of a colouring. fact8: Every man is laurelled and loans Leguminosae. fact9: Something is noxious if that that is not a kind of a bounded and that is noxious is wrong. fact10: If that someone is not a Cichorium and it is not spatial hold it is laurelled. fact11: Some man is a Hippotragus if she/he does untie. fact12: If that langlaufer is noxious the fact that this slicker is not a Cichorium but it does loan Leguminosae is wrong. fact13: That langlaufer is not a kind of a colouring if Megan is a kind of a meditativeness that is a colouring. fact14: If the fact that something is both a Schumpeter and not a bounded is incorrect this is noxious.

fact1: {D}{a} fact2: {E}{a} -> (¬{D}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) fact3: {A}{a} fact4: {D}{a} -> {D}{aa} fact5: {B}{aa} fact6: ¬{B}{a} -> ¬({A}{aa} & {C}{aa}) fact7: ¬{H}{b} -> ¬({G}{b} & ¬{F}{b}) fact8: (x): ({A}x & {B}x) fact9: (x): ¬(¬{F}x & ¬{E}x) -> {E}x fact10: (x): (¬{D}x & ¬{C}x) -> {A}x fact11: (x): {CL}x -> {FT}x fact12: {E}{b} -> ¬(¬{D}{a} & {B}{a}) fact13: ({I}{c} & {H}{c}) -> ¬{H}{b} fact14: (x): ¬({G}x & ¬{F}x) -> {E}x

This slicker is laurelled and it is a mettle.

({A}{a} & {AF}{a})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This slicker is a Cichorium. fact2: If this slicker is noxious then this one is not a Cichorium and this one is not spatial. fact3: This slicker is laurelled. fact4: If this slicker is a Cichorium that prig is a Cichorium. fact5: That prig loans Leguminosae. fact6: The fact that that that prig is laurelled and the thing is spatial hold does not hold if this slicker does not loan Leguminosae. fact7: That that langlaufer is a Schumpeter but it is not a kind of a bounded is false if that langlaufer is not a kind of a colouring. fact8: Every man is laurelled and loans Leguminosae. fact9: Something is noxious if that that is not a kind of a bounded and that is noxious is wrong. fact10: If that someone is not a Cichorium and it is not spatial hold it is laurelled. fact11: Some man is a Hippotragus if she/he does untie. fact12: If that langlaufer is noxious the fact that this slicker is not a Cichorium but it does loan Leguminosae is wrong. fact13: That langlaufer is not a kind of a colouring if Megan is a kind of a meditativeness that is a colouring. fact14: If the fact that something is both a Schumpeter and not a bounded is incorrect this is noxious. ; $hypothesis$ = That prig is laurelled and it is spatial. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That this non-cosmogonicalness and this non-nephriticness occurs is incorrect.

¬(¬{E} & ¬{D})

fact1: If that that conventionalisation happens and that elongating Praxiteles occurs is incorrect that that conventionalisation does not occurs is correct. fact2: This collegiateness does not happens if that that congratulations happens hold. fact3: The fact that the paralytic does not happens and the coloring does not occurs is wrong. fact4: If this collegiateness does not occurs the fact that this non-cosmogonicalness and this non-nephriticness occurs is wrong. fact5: That that laming does not occurs and that metalness does not happens is not correct. fact6: If this collegiateness does not happens then that that cosmogonicalness and this non-nephriticness happens is wrong. fact7: That that cosmogonicalness does not happens but that nephriticness occurs is false. fact8: That that congratulations does not occurs brings about that both this non-cosmogonicalness and this non-nephriticness occurs. fact9: Either that the strained happens or that that anguineness happens or both prevents that that ergoticness occurs. fact10: That that cosmogonicalness but notthat nephriticness happens is wrong. fact11: This collegiateness does not happens if that congratulations or this Tantricness or both occurs. fact12: The fact that either this outsmarting Sacagawea happens or the syndicating Lagenaria happens or both is right. fact13: If this bebopping does not happens the fact that this ammoniacalness does not occurs and that monsoon does not happens does not hold. fact14: If that conventionalisation does not occurs then that rounding Mahomet and/or that ditching Cordia occurs. fact15: Either this reciprocating or that the keying Duma happens or both prevents that Leviticalness. fact16: If the fact that this ammoniacalness does not happens and that monsoon does not occurs does not hold the fact that this fussing does not happens hold. fact17: Notthis bebopping but that profitableness occurs if that hunting does not happens. fact18: If this collegiateness does not occurs then that that cosmogonicalness does not occurs and that nephriticness happens is false. fact19: If this fussing does not occurs the fact that both that conventionalisation and that elongating Praxiteles occurs does not hold. fact20: This Tantricness occurs. fact21: If that congratulations does not occurs the fact that both this non-buteonineness and this non-systematicness occurs is wrong. fact22: If that debasing does not happens that that ditching Cordia does not occurs and this bebopping does not occurs does not hold.

fact1: ¬({H} & {J}) -> ¬{H} fact2: {A} -> ¬{C} fact3: ¬(¬{BO} & ¬{FK}) fact4: ¬{C} -> ¬(¬{E} & ¬{D}) fact5: ¬(¬{HT} & ¬{EN}) fact6: ¬{C} -> ¬({E} & ¬{D}) fact7: ¬(¬{E} & {D}) fact8: ¬{A} -> (¬{E} & ¬{D}) fact9: ({IP} v {AH}) -> ¬{CU} fact10: ¬({E} & ¬{D}) fact11: ({A} v {B}) -> ¬{C} fact12: ({IQ} v {EU}) fact13: ¬{M} -> ¬(¬{K} & ¬{L}) fact14: ¬{H} -> ({G} v {F}) fact15: ({JJ} v {AL}) -> ¬{DH} fact16: ¬(¬{K} & ¬{L}) -> ¬{I} fact17: ¬{O} -> (¬{M} & {N}) fact18: ¬{C} -> ¬(¬{E} & {D}) fact19: ¬{I} -> ¬({H} & {J}) fact20: {B} fact21: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{DI} & ¬{JF}) fact22: ¬{DK} -> ¬(¬{F} & ¬{M})

That cosmogonicalness does not happens and that nephriticness does not occurs.

(¬{E} & ¬{D})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that that conventionalisation happens and that elongating Praxiteles occurs is incorrect that that conventionalisation does not occurs is correct. fact2: This collegiateness does not happens if that that congratulations happens hold. fact3: The fact that the paralytic does not happens and the coloring does not occurs is wrong. fact4: If this collegiateness does not occurs the fact that this non-cosmogonicalness and this non-nephriticness occurs is wrong. fact5: That that laming does not occurs and that metalness does not happens is not correct. fact6: If this collegiateness does not happens then that that cosmogonicalness and this non-nephriticness happens is wrong. fact7: That that cosmogonicalness does not happens but that nephriticness occurs is false. fact8: That that congratulations does not occurs brings about that both this non-cosmogonicalness and this non-nephriticness occurs. fact9: Either that the strained happens or that that anguineness happens or both prevents that that ergoticness occurs. fact10: That that cosmogonicalness but notthat nephriticness happens is wrong. fact11: This collegiateness does not happens if that congratulations or this Tantricness or both occurs. fact12: The fact that either this outsmarting Sacagawea happens or the syndicating Lagenaria happens or both is right. fact13: If this bebopping does not happens the fact that this ammoniacalness does not occurs and that monsoon does not happens does not hold. fact14: If that conventionalisation does not occurs then that rounding Mahomet and/or that ditching Cordia occurs. fact15: Either this reciprocating or that the keying Duma happens or both prevents that Leviticalness. fact16: If the fact that this ammoniacalness does not happens and that monsoon does not occurs does not hold the fact that this fussing does not happens hold. fact17: Notthis bebopping but that profitableness occurs if that hunting does not happens. fact18: If this collegiateness does not occurs then that that cosmogonicalness does not occurs and that nephriticness happens is false. fact19: If this fussing does not occurs the fact that both that conventionalisation and that elongating Praxiteles occurs does not hold. fact20: This Tantricness occurs. fact21: If that congratulations does not occurs the fact that both this non-buteonineness and this non-systematicness occurs is wrong. fact22: If that debasing does not happens that that ditching Cordia does not occurs and this bebopping does not occurs does not hold. ; $hypothesis$ = That this non-cosmogonicalness and this non-nephriticness occurs is incorrect. ; $proof$ =

fact20 -> int1: That congratulations occurs and/or this Tantricness happens.; int1 & fact11 -> int2: That this collegiateness does not happens is right.; int2 & fact4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

Either Austin is not apophyseal or she/he is not a Furnivall or both.

(¬{AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a})

fact1: The solidness is not a kind of a Furnivall. fact2: If Austin is not cartographic that does not dusk and is a kind of a graphospasm. fact3: Austin does not interlace. fact4: That Austin is not apophyseal and/or it is not caloric is incorrect if it is not instrumental. fact5: The fact that either Austin is not apophyseal or she is not a kind of a Furnivall or both is wrong if Austin does not interlace. fact6: Some man that tangles Hirudo bags affrication. fact7: The fact that some person does not interlace or she does not stone Eleutherodactylus or both does not hold if she does bag affrication. fact8: Austin is apophyseal if it does not interlace. fact9: The fact that Austin either does not shoe Albula or is not a malted or both is wrong if Austin does not exterminate Asteraceae. fact10: If Austin is not a hollow then that Austin either does not interlace or is not a Petroselinum or both is not correct. fact11: The fact that that this taproot does not interlace or does not shoe Albula or both hold does not hold. fact12: If someone interlaces then it is not apophyseal and/or it is not a Furnivall. fact13: Austin is apophyseal.

fact1: ¬{AB}{ig} fact2: ¬{F}{a} -> (¬{E}{a} & {D}{a}) fact3: ¬{A}{a} fact4: ¬{DD}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{a} v ¬{CE}{a}) fact5: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) fact6: (x): {C}x -> {B}x fact7: (x): {B}x -> ¬(¬{A}x v ¬{IH}x) fact8: ¬{A}{a} -> {AA}{a} fact9: ¬{EH}{a} -> ¬(¬{GN}{a} v ¬{EQ}{a}) fact10: ¬{JF}{a} -> ¬(¬{A}{a} v ¬{JD}{a}) fact11: ¬(¬{A}{t} v ¬{GN}{t}) fact12: (x): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x) fact13: {AA}{a}

That this evaporation does not interlace and/or it does not stone Eleutherodactylus is incorrect.

¬(¬{A}{bj} v ¬{IH}{bj})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The solidness is not a kind of a Furnivall. fact2: If Austin is not cartographic that does not dusk and is a kind of a graphospasm. fact3: Austin does not interlace. fact4: That Austin is not apophyseal and/or it is not caloric is incorrect if it is not instrumental. fact5: The fact that either Austin is not apophyseal or she is not a kind of a Furnivall or both is wrong if Austin does not interlace. fact6: Some man that tangles Hirudo bags affrication. fact7: The fact that some person does not interlace or she does not stone Eleutherodactylus or both does not hold if she does bag affrication. fact8: Austin is apophyseal if it does not interlace. fact9: The fact that Austin either does not shoe Albula or is not a malted or both is wrong if Austin does not exterminate Asteraceae. fact10: If Austin is not a hollow then that Austin either does not interlace or is not a Petroselinum or both is not correct. fact11: The fact that that this taproot does not interlace or does not shoe Albula or both hold does not hold. fact12: If someone interlaces then it is not apophyseal and/or it is not a Furnivall. fact13: Austin is apophyseal. ; $hypothesis$ = Either Austin is not apophyseal or she/he is not a Furnivall or both. ; $proof$ =

fact5 & fact3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

The fact that that Palaeolithic and this boom happens is wrong.

¬({D} & {C})

fact1: This optative happens. fact2: If that reconnoitering occurs that inspectorship happens. fact3: Both this belting risibility and this creeping happens. fact4: That skanking occurs. fact5: This plural occurs. fact6: The fact that this tattooing occurs but that subbing does not happens is wrong if that cacophony does not happens. fact7: If this Scottishness happens that this housewifery does not occurs but this unfairness happens does not hold. fact8: That inspectorship does not occurs if the fact that this tattooing occurs but that subbing does not happens is false. fact9: This plural occurs if the fact that this housewifery does not happens and this unfairness occurs does not hold. fact10: The capitulation and the blazing saintliness occurs. fact11: If that this plural does not occurs and this housewifery occurs does not hold then this plural happens. fact12: If that this demographic does not happens hold this recusal and that unarmoredness occurs. fact13: If that fetch occurs that cacophony does not occurs. fact14: That fetch occurs if that that unarmoredness occurs hold. fact15: If the fact that this imposition happens is true that subbing happens. fact16: That that operations occurs is not wrong. fact17: If this batting does not occurs both this cocooning grosz and this convention occurs. fact18: The laying despondency and this hairweaving occurs. fact19: That that Palaeolithic happens and this boom happens does not hold if that reconnoitering does not happens. fact20: This batting does not occurs if the aphaniticness does not occurs. fact21: That reconnoitering occurs. fact22: Both this plural and that Palaeolithic occurs. fact23: That this Scottishness happens is brought about by this cocooning grosz.

fact1: {IK} fact2: {A} -> {B} fact3: ({DP} & {HA}) fact4: {DB} fact5: {E} fact6: ¬{O} -> ¬({L} & ¬{M}) fact7: {H} -> ¬(¬{F} & {G}) fact8: ¬({L} & ¬{M}) -> ¬{B} fact9: ¬(¬{F} & {G}) -> {E} fact10: ({FH} & {DC}) fact11: ¬(¬{E} & {F}) -> {E} fact12: ¬{S} -> ({R} & {Q}) fact13: {P} -> ¬{O} fact14: {Q} -> {P} fact15: {AQ} -> {M} fact16: {GF} fact17: ¬{K} -> ({I} & {J}) fact18: ({FD} & {JG}) fact19: ¬{A} -> ¬({D} & {C}) fact20: ¬{N} -> ¬{K} fact21: {A} fact22: ({E} & {D}) fact23: {I} -> {H}

This fortunateness occurs.

{JC}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This optative happens. fact2: If that reconnoitering occurs that inspectorship happens. fact3: Both this belting risibility and this creeping happens. fact4: That skanking occurs. fact5: This plural occurs. fact6: The fact that this tattooing occurs but that subbing does not happens is wrong if that cacophony does not happens. fact7: If this Scottishness happens that this housewifery does not occurs but this unfairness happens does not hold. fact8: That inspectorship does not occurs if the fact that this tattooing occurs but that subbing does not happens is false. fact9: This plural occurs if the fact that this housewifery does not happens and this unfairness occurs does not hold. fact10: The capitulation and the blazing saintliness occurs. fact11: If that this plural does not occurs and this housewifery occurs does not hold then this plural happens. fact12: If that this demographic does not happens hold this recusal and that unarmoredness occurs. fact13: If that fetch occurs that cacophony does not occurs. fact14: That fetch occurs if that that unarmoredness occurs hold. fact15: If the fact that this imposition happens is true that subbing happens. fact16: That that operations occurs is not wrong. fact17: If this batting does not occurs both this cocooning grosz and this convention occurs. fact18: The laying despondency and this hairweaving occurs. fact19: That that Palaeolithic happens and this boom happens does not hold if that reconnoitering does not happens. fact20: This batting does not occurs if the aphaniticness does not occurs. fact21: That reconnoitering occurs. fact22: Both this plural and that Palaeolithic occurs. fact23: That this Scottishness happens is brought about by this cocooning grosz. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that Palaeolithic and this boom happens is wrong. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That that basket is not a GI hold.

¬{B}{a}

fact1: If this small is unsized then that publisher is unsized. fact2: That if this saloon does not isolate macroglossia then that that basket is a GI that is a Atropos is wrong hold. fact3: If either something is not a Cetonia or it is not sized or both then it is not sized. fact4: If that solid does not shelter dg the fact that this saloon is a kind of a Hahn that does isolate macroglossia does not hold. fact5: That basket is not a gradual and does not tittivate. fact6: If that something is a kind of a GI and it is a Atropos is incorrect it is not a GI. fact7: If the fact that that the ewer is not a Muharram and it is not autotelic hold is false then this small is not a kind of a Muharram. fact8: That basket is a GI if that basket is a kind of a gradual that does not tittivate. fact9: That basket is not a kind of a gradual. fact10: If the fact that somebody is a Hahn and that person isolates macroglossia is wrong then the fact that that person does not isolates macroglossia is not wrong. fact11: That basket is a GI if it is not a kind of a gradual and it does not tittivate. fact12: Something is either not a Cetonia or unsized or both if that is not a Muharram. fact13: If that publisher is unsized then that camel is not naturistic and/or it does not shelter dg.

fact1: {G}{f} -> {G}{e} fact2: ¬{C}{b} -> ¬({B}{a} & {A}{a}) fact3: (x): (¬{H}x v {G}x) -> {G}x fact4: ¬{D}{c} -> ¬({E}{b} & {C}{b}) fact5: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact6: (x): ¬({B}x & {A}x) -> ¬{B}x fact7: ¬(¬{I}{g} & ¬{J}{g}) -> ¬{I}{f} fact8: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} fact9: ¬{AA}{a} fact10: (x): ¬({E}x & {C}x) -> ¬{C}x fact11: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} fact12: (x): ¬{I}x -> (¬{H}x v {G}x) fact13: {G}{e} -> (¬{F}{d} v ¬{D}{d})

That that basket is not a GI hold.

¬{B}{a}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this small is unsized then that publisher is unsized. fact2: That if this saloon does not isolate macroglossia then that that basket is a GI that is a Atropos is wrong hold. fact3: If either something is not a Cetonia or it is not sized or both then it is not sized. fact4: If that solid does not shelter dg the fact that this saloon is a kind of a Hahn that does isolate macroglossia does not hold. fact5: That basket is not a gradual and does not tittivate. fact6: If that something is a kind of a GI and it is a Atropos is incorrect it is not a GI. fact7: If the fact that that the ewer is not a Muharram and it is not autotelic hold is false then this small is not a kind of a Muharram. fact8: That basket is a GI if that basket is a kind of a gradual that does not tittivate. fact9: That basket is not a kind of a gradual. fact10: If the fact that somebody is a Hahn and that person isolates macroglossia is wrong then the fact that that person does not isolates macroglossia is not wrong. fact11: That basket is a GI if it is not a kind of a gradual and it does not tittivate. fact12: Something is either not a Cetonia or unsized or both if that is not a Muharram. fact13: If that publisher is unsized then that camel is not naturistic and/or it does not shelter dg. ; $hypothesis$ = That that basket is not a GI hold. ; $proof$ =

fact11 & fact5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That tailstock is not arbitrary.

¬{B}{b}

fact1: The fact that the fact that that tailstock is a rigging that does not bill Rothschild hold is not true if that tailstock is non-dateable. fact2: If the fact that this forum is not creative is not wrong then that the fact that this forum is arbitrary but this thing is not a umpirage is incorrect hold. fact3: That this forum is not albuminous is right. fact4: This forum is a kind of a umpirage if this forum is a Plectania. fact5: If the fact that this forum is a umpirage hold that tailstock is a umpirage. fact6: That tailstock is not arbitrary if this forum is creative. fact7: That EBV is not a umpirage. fact8: That someone is both an alliteration and not a umpirage does not hold if this person is substantial. fact9: Some person is arbitrary if this one is a umpirage. fact10: If this forum is not a umpirage that this forum is a Lentibulariaceae but it is not creative is incorrect. fact11: This forum does not dulcorate Saxony. fact12: If that this forum is not Essene and/or that thing is a bats does not hold that thing is a kind of a Plectania. fact13: The fact that this forum is a kind of a Lentibulariaceae and this person is creative does not hold. fact14: The informer is not a kind of a umpirage. fact15: The fact that the fact that something is not Essene or is a bats or both is right is false if that thing is not adequate. fact16: This forum is not a umpirage. fact17: If this forum is not a umpirage then that this forum is a Lentibulariaceae and is creative is false.

fact1: ¬{CL}{b} -> ¬({P}{b} & ¬{GD}{b}) fact2: ¬{AB}{a} -> ¬({B}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) fact3: ¬{EB}{a} fact4: {C}{a} -> {A}{a} fact5: {A}{a} -> {A}{b} fact6: {AB}{a} -> ¬{B}{b} fact7: ¬{A}{h} fact8: (x): ¬{HT}x -> ¬({HU}x & ¬{A}x) fact9: (x): {A}x -> {B}x fact10: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact11: ¬{IP}{a} fact12: ¬(¬{E}{a} v {D}{a}) -> {C}{a} fact13: ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact14: ¬{A}{gp} fact15: (x): ¬{F}x -> ¬(¬{E}x v {D}x) fact16: ¬{A}{a} fact17: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a})

If this forum is not unsubstantial then the fact that this forum is an alliteration but he is not a umpirage does not hold.

¬{HT}{a} -> ¬({HU}{a} & ¬{A}{a})

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that the fact that that tailstock is a rigging that does not bill Rothschild hold is not true if that tailstock is non-dateable. fact2: If the fact that this forum is not creative is not wrong then that the fact that this forum is arbitrary but this thing is not a umpirage is incorrect hold. fact3: That this forum is not albuminous is right. fact4: This forum is a kind of a umpirage if this forum is a Plectania. fact5: If the fact that this forum is a umpirage hold that tailstock is a umpirage. fact6: That tailstock is not arbitrary if this forum is creative. fact7: That EBV is not a umpirage. fact8: That someone is both an alliteration and not a umpirage does not hold if this person is substantial. fact9: Some person is arbitrary if this one is a umpirage. fact10: If this forum is not a umpirage that this forum is a Lentibulariaceae but it is not creative is incorrect. fact11: This forum does not dulcorate Saxony. fact12: If that this forum is not Essene and/or that thing is a bats does not hold that thing is a kind of a Plectania. fact13: The fact that this forum is a kind of a Lentibulariaceae and this person is creative does not hold. fact14: The informer is not a kind of a umpirage. fact15: The fact that the fact that something is not Essene or is a bats or both is right is false if that thing is not adequate. fact16: This forum is not a umpirage. fact17: If this forum is not a umpirage then that this forum is a Lentibulariaceae and is creative is false. ; $hypothesis$ = That tailstock is not arbitrary. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This retiring happens.

{B}

fact1: If this candying Mephitinae happens the fact that notthe unacknowledgedness but that exclusion occurs is wrong. fact2: If that armlessness does not occurs that outraging sixtieth happens or this o.d.ing happens or both. fact3: That that dropping does not occurs and that retaining chivaree does not happens is caused by that fluttering. fact4: If that outraging sixtieth does not happens then the fact that that armlessness and this o.d.ing occurs is not right. fact5: If this jesting downgrade does not occurs then this oration occurs and/or this chiselling Porzana occurs. fact6: That that retaining chivaree does not happens results in that both the cheerfulness and that dropping occurs. fact7: The fact that that unfastidiousness or this non-homostyledness or both happens is true if this tightening worth happens. fact8: If this articulariness does not occurs then that outraging sixtieth does not happens. fact9: If that cheerlessness does not happens that favoring happens and that spectralness occurs. fact10: If the fact that this articulariness and the colouringness occurs does not hold this articulariness does not occurs. fact11: The fact that this articulariness occurs and the colouringness occurs is incorrect if that exclusion does not happens. fact12: That exclusion does not happens if the fact that that both this non-unacknowledgedness and that exclusion occurs does not hold is true. fact13: If that unfastidiousness or this non-homostyledness or both happens this retiring does not occurs. fact14: If this starting novella happens that bending does not happens and this jesting downgrade does not happens. fact15: That placableness happens if that this retiring does not occurs and/or this tightening worth happens is incorrect. fact16: This retiring does not occurs if that unfastidiousness happens. fact17: If that dropping does not occurs then that cheerlessness does not occurs. fact18: If this o.d.ing does not happens then that fluttering does not happens and that retaining chivaree does not occurs. fact19: This o.d.ing does not occurs if that that armlessness and this o.d.ing occurs is incorrect. fact20: If that favoring happens the fact that either this retiring does not occurs or this tightening worth occurs or both is not correct. fact21: That that cheerlessness does not occurs causes that that favoring does not occurs and that spectralness does not occurs. fact22: That armlessness does not happens if this articulariness does not occurs. fact23: This tightening worth occurs.

fact1: {P} -> ¬(¬{O} & {M}) fact2: ¬{K} -> ({J} v {I}) fact3: {H} -> (¬{F} & ¬{G}) fact4: ¬{J} -> ¬({K} & {I}) fact5: ¬{S} -> ({Q} v {R}) fact6: ¬{G} -> (¬{E} & {F}) fact7: {A} -> ({AA} v ¬{AB}) fact8: ¬{L} -> ¬{J} fact9: ¬{E} -> ({C} & {D}) fact10: ¬({L} & {N}) -> ¬{L} fact11: ¬{M} -> ¬({L} & {N}) fact12: ¬(¬{O} & {M}) -> ¬{M} fact13: ({AA} v ¬{AB}) -> ¬{B} fact14: {U} -> (¬{T} & ¬{S}) fact15: ¬(¬{B} v {A}) -> {BS} fact16: {AA} -> ¬{B} fact17: ¬{F} -> ¬{E} fact18: ¬{I} -> (¬{H} & ¬{G}) fact19: ¬({K} & {I}) -> ¬{I} fact20: {C} -> ¬(¬{B} v {A}) fact21: ¬{E} -> (¬{C} & ¬{D}) fact22: ¬{L} -> ¬{K} fact23: {A}

That placableness occurs.

{BS}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this candying Mephitinae happens the fact that notthe unacknowledgedness but that exclusion occurs is wrong. fact2: If that armlessness does not occurs that outraging sixtieth happens or this o.d.ing happens or both. fact3: That that dropping does not occurs and that retaining chivaree does not happens is caused by that fluttering. fact4: If that outraging sixtieth does not happens then the fact that that armlessness and this o.d.ing occurs is not right. fact5: If this jesting downgrade does not occurs then this oration occurs and/or this chiselling Porzana occurs. fact6: That that retaining chivaree does not happens results in that both the cheerfulness and that dropping occurs. fact7: The fact that that unfastidiousness or this non-homostyledness or both happens is true if this tightening worth happens. fact8: If this articulariness does not occurs then that outraging sixtieth does not happens. fact9: If that cheerlessness does not happens that favoring happens and that spectralness occurs. fact10: If the fact that this articulariness and the colouringness occurs does not hold this articulariness does not occurs. fact11: The fact that this articulariness occurs and the colouringness occurs is incorrect if that exclusion does not happens. fact12: That exclusion does not happens if the fact that that both this non-unacknowledgedness and that exclusion occurs does not hold is true. fact13: If that unfastidiousness or this non-homostyledness or both happens this retiring does not occurs. fact14: If this starting novella happens that bending does not happens and this jesting downgrade does not happens. fact15: That placableness happens if that this retiring does not occurs and/or this tightening worth happens is incorrect. fact16: This retiring does not occurs if that unfastidiousness happens. fact17: If that dropping does not occurs then that cheerlessness does not occurs. fact18: If this o.d.ing does not happens then that fluttering does not happens and that retaining chivaree does not occurs. fact19: This o.d.ing does not occurs if that that armlessness and this o.d.ing occurs is incorrect. fact20: If that favoring happens the fact that either this retiring does not occurs or this tightening worth occurs or both is not correct. fact21: That that cheerlessness does not occurs causes that that favoring does not occurs and that spectralness does not occurs. fact22: That armlessness does not happens if this articulariness does not occurs. fact23: This tightening worth occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = This retiring happens. ; $proof$ =

fact7 & fact23 -> int1: Either that unfastidiousness or this non-homostyledness or both occurs.; int1 & fact13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That that suite does not please feebleness but it caprioles oratorio is not incorrect.

(¬{B}{a} & {C}{a})

fact1: That that suite does not please feebleness and caprioles oratorio does not hold if something does bind prosodion.

fact1: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{B}{a} & {C}{a})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That that suite does not please feebleness and caprioles oratorio does not hold if something does bind prosodion. ; $hypothesis$ = That that suite does not please feebleness but it caprioles oratorio is not incorrect. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That dishwasher slants neoplasm.

{C}{b}

fact1: That dishwasher is a kind of a cellulitis. fact2: That the fries does flute legality is correct if that dishwasher does slant neoplasm. fact3: If something defines this does not slant neoplasm. fact4: That that dishwasher does not flute legality hold if that this mandible apes and/or it is sabbatical is incorrect. fact5: That dishwasher defines if this mandible slants neoplasm. fact6: That wiper slants neoplasm. fact7: The erection slants neoplasm. fact8: That dishwasher flutes legality. fact9: If this mandible slants neoplasm then it defines. fact10: This mandible reasserts hello. fact11: If this mandible defines then that one flutes legality. fact12: If the logician flutes legality then that dishwasher slants neoplasm. fact13: That dishwasher does slant neoplasm if this mandible flutes legality. fact14: That dishwasher is a Wagner. fact15: The Neanderthal defines. fact16: If this mandible does slant neoplasm then that dishwasher flutes legality. fact17: This mandible slants neoplasm if that dishwasher defines.

fact1: {BH}{b} fact2: {C}{b} -> {B}{hg} fact3: (x): {A}x -> ¬{C}x fact4: ¬({D}{a} v {E}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact5: {C}{a} -> {A}{b} fact6: {C}{bf} fact7: {C}{jk} fact8: {B}{b} fact9: {C}{a} -> {A}{a} fact10: {AJ}{a} fact11: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} fact12: {B}{dg} -> {C}{b} fact13: {B}{a} -> {C}{b} fact14: {HS}{b} fact15: {A}{eg} fact16: {C}{a} -> {B}{b} fact17: {A}{b} -> {C}{a}

That dishwasher does not slant neoplasm.

¬{C}{b}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That dishwasher is a kind of a cellulitis. fact2: That the fries does flute legality is correct if that dishwasher does slant neoplasm. fact3: If something defines this does not slant neoplasm. fact4: That that dishwasher does not flute legality hold if that this mandible apes and/or it is sabbatical is incorrect. fact5: That dishwasher defines if this mandible slants neoplasm. fact6: That wiper slants neoplasm. fact7: The erection slants neoplasm. fact8: That dishwasher flutes legality. fact9: If this mandible slants neoplasm then it defines. fact10: This mandible reasserts hello. fact11: If this mandible defines then that one flutes legality. fact12: If the logician flutes legality then that dishwasher slants neoplasm. fact13: That dishwasher does slant neoplasm if this mandible flutes legality. fact14: That dishwasher is a Wagner. fact15: The Neanderthal defines. fact16: If this mandible does slant neoplasm then that dishwasher flutes legality. fact17: This mandible slants neoplasm if that dishwasher defines. ; $hypothesis$ = That dishwasher slants neoplasm. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

Either this amoeba is not a kind of a hyperplasia or it is not a Sedna or both.

(¬{A}{b} v ¬{C}{b})

fact1: This amoeba is not a achlorhydria if that Katari is a kind of an egotism but it is not batrachian. fact2: This amoeba is a Sedna if this amoeba is not a achlorhydria. fact3: The fact that something either is not a hyperplasia or is not a Sedna or both is wrong if it is not a achlorhydria.

fact1: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact2: ¬{B}{b} -> {C}{b} fact3: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬(¬{A}x v ¬{C}x)

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This amoeba is not a achlorhydria if that Katari is a kind of an egotism but it is not batrachian. fact2: This amoeba is a Sedna if this amoeba is not a achlorhydria. fact3: The fact that something either is not a hyperplasia or is not a Sedna or both is wrong if it is not a achlorhydria. ; $hypothesis$ = Either this amoeba is not a kind of a hyperplasia or it is not a Sedna or both. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That everything does Fall marauding does not hold.

¬((x): {A}x)

fact1: Something designs NASDAQ if it does not Fall marauding. fact2: Something is not a palpitation if that that is alchemistical thing that unweaves Greenberg is wrong. fact3: Every man is uninterrupted. fact4: Everything does labor. fact5: Something Falls marauding and is not non-Monophysitic if it is not a kind of a baronage. fact6: That everyone is not dolichocephalic hold. fact7: Some person that is not a palpitation is not zygotic but a preface. fact8: Everything is a kind of a Cryptogrammataceae. fact9: Everything is undemanding. fact10: That something is alchemistical and it does unweave Greenberg is false if it is not dolichocephalic. fact11: Someone is not a baronage if the fact that it is not undesigned but a baronage is incorrect. fact12: Every man Falls marauding. fact13: Everyone is a kind of a Hestia.

fact1: (x): ¬{A}x -> {CQ}x fact2: (x): ¬({G}x & {H}x) -> ¬{F}x fact3: (x): {BP}x fact4: (x): {JI}x fact5: (x): ¬{B}x -> ({A}x & {DC}x) fact6: (x): ¬{I}x fact7: (x): ¬{F}x -> (¬{E}x & {C}x) fact8: (x): {JE}x fact9: (x): {HN}x fact10: (x): ¬{I}x -> ¬({G}x & {H}x) fact11: (x): ¬(¬{D}x & {B}x) -> ¬{B}x fact12: (x): {A}x fact13: (x): {DI}x

Everything is Monophysitic.

(x): {DC}x

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Something designs NASDAQ if it does not Fall marauding. fact2: Something is not a palpitation if that that is alchemistical thing that unweaves Greenberg is wrong. fact3: Every man is uninterrupted. fact4: Everything does labor. fact5: Something Falls marauding and is not non-Monophysitic if it is not a kind of a baronage. fact6: That everyone is not dolichocephalic hold. fact7: Some person that is not a palpitation is not zygotic but a preface. fact8: Everything is a kind of a Cryptogrammataceae. fact9: Everything is undemanding. fact10: That something is alchemistical and it does unweave Greenberg is false if it is not dolichocephalic. fact11: Someone is not a baronage if the fact that it is not undesigned but a baronage is incorrect. fact12: Every man Falls marauding. fact13: Everyone is a kind of a Hestia. ; $hypothesis$ = That everything does Fall marauding does not hold. ; $proof$ =

fact12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

Everything is an elective.

(x): {A}x

fact1: Everything is a KiB. fact2: Everything is an elective. fact3: Everyone is absorbable. fact4: The fact that everything is a kind of a smattering is true. fact5: The fact that everyone is a kind of a Rhodophyceae hold. fact6: Every man is a Euripides. fact7: Everything is unpronounceable. fact8: Every man is a kind of a Asteridae. fact9: Everything is a Polyborus. fact10: Every person is oleaceous.

fact1: (x): {BB}x fact2: (x): {A}x fact3: (x): {JG}x fact4: (x): {HT}x fact5: (x): {DN}x fact6: (x): {GA}x fact7: (x): {FI}x fact8: (x): {FQ}x fact9: (x): {CH}x fact10: (x): {JD}x

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: Everything is a KiB. fact2: Everything is an elective. fact3: Everyone is absorbable. fact4: The fact that everything is a kind of a smattering is true. fact5: The fact that everyone is a kind of a Rhodophyceae hold. fact6: Every man is a Euripides. fact7: Everything is unpronounceable. fact8: Every man is a kind of a Asteridae. fact9: Everything is a Polyborus. fact10: Every person is oleaceous. ; $hypothesis$ = Everything is an elective. ; $proof$ =

fact2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

Both that Mill and that annoying Dacrymyces occurs.

({B} & {C})

fact1: This outrunning Iguania does not occurs. fact2: Both that annoying Dacrymyces and this lowness occurs. fact3: This lowness happens. fact4: This outrunning Iguania does not occurs and that Mill occurs. fact5: That this outrunning Iguania does not occurs and this lowness does not happens is brought about by that that premiership does not happens.

fact1: ¬{A} fact2: ({C} & {D}) fact3: {D} fact4: (¬{A} & {B}) fact5: ¬{E} -> (¬{A} & ¬{D})

The fact that both that Mill and that annoying Dacrymyces occurs is false.

¬({B} & {C})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This outrunning Iguania does not occurs. fact2: Both that annoying Dacrymyces and this lowness occurs. fact3: This lowness happens. fact4: This outrunning Iguania does not occurs and that Mill occurs. fact5: That this outrunning Iguania does not occurs and this lowness does not happens is brought about by that that premiership does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = Both that Mill and that annoying Dacrymyces occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact4 -> int1: That Mill occurs.; fact2 -> int2: That annoying Dacrymyces occurs.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

Andi is efficient.

{AB}{a}

fact1: If that cupronickel tessellates that Kabbalist emanates Landsteiner. fact2: The graduate is not efficient. fact3: If Andi is a kind of an arc then the fact that this assailant does not reverence FAS and is not subtropical is false. fact4: The fact that Andi is subtropical and is an alphabet if Andi is not anthropometrical is right. fact5: Something does tessellate if that it does not tessellate and is a haunt does not hold. fact6: The fact that that cupronickel does not tessellate and is a haunt does not hold. fact7: Andi is not subtropical. fact8: Andi screens and is an arc if there exists something such that it meanders allusiveness. fact9: Something is a Filicinae if that that does not slice worthiness and does not climax Cyanophyta is wrong. fact10: This mudhif is a abhenry and knights predicator if the fact that this mudhif is not a Dagda is correct. fact11: Andi knights predicator. fact12: If that that something does not reverence FAS and it is not subtropical is true is incorrect then it knights predicator. fact13: The fact that some person does not slice worthiness and it does not climax Cyanophyta does not hold if it emanates Landsteiner. fact14: If that cranesbill is not an arc the fact that Andi does not reverence FAS but that is subtropical is incorrect. fact15: Andi does knight predicator if Andi is not subtropical. fact16: If that Kabbalist is a kind of a Filicinae then that cranesbill meanders allusiveness. fact17: If Andi is not subtropical Andi knights predicator and this is efficient.

fact1: {J}{d} -> {I}{c} fact2: ¬{AB}{ie} fact3: {C}{a} -> ¬(¬{B}{ih} & ¬{A}{ih}) fact4: ¬{IT}{a} -> ({A}{a} & {FH}{a}) fact5: (x): ¬(¬{J}x & {L}x) -> {J}x fact6: ¬(¬{J}{d} & {L}{d}) fact7: ¬{A}{a} fact8: (x): {E}x -> ({D}{a} & {C}{a}) fact9: (x): ¬(¬{G}x & ¬{H}x) -> {F}x fact10: ¬{BM}{k} -> ({EU}{k} & {AA}{k}) fact11: {AA}{a} fact12: (x): ¬(¬{B}x & ¬{A}x) -> {AA}x fact13: (x): {I}x -> ¬(¬{G}x & ¬{H}x) fact14: ¬{C}{b} -> ¬(¬{B}{a} & {A}{a}) fact15: ¬{A}{a} -> {AA}{a} fact16: {F}{c} -> {E}{b} fact17: ¬{A}{a} -> ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a})

This assailant knights predicator.

{AA}{ih}

PROVED

PROVED

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: If that cupronickel tessellates that Kabbalist emanates Landsteiner. fact2: The graduate is not efficient. fact3: If Andi is a kind of an arc then the fact that this assailant does not reverence FAS and is not subtropical is false. fact4: The fact that Andi is subtropical and is an alphabet if Andi is not anthropometrical is right. fact5: Something does tessellate if that it does not tessellate and is a haunt does not hold. fact6: The fact that that cupronickel does not tessellate and is a haunt does not hold. fact7: Andi is not subtropical. fact8: Andi screens and is an arc if there exists something such that it meanders allusiveness. fact9: Something is a Filicinae if that that does not slice worthiness and does not climax Cyanophyta is wrong. fact10: This mudhif is a abhenry and knights predicator if the fact that this mudhif is not a Dagda is correct. fact11: Andi knights predicator. fact12: If that that something does not reverence FAS and it is not subtropical is true is incorrect then it knights predicator. fact13: The fact that some person does not slice worthiness and it does not climax Cyanophyta does not hold if it emanates Landsteiner. fact14: If that cranesbill is not an arc the fact that Andi does not reverence FAS but that is subtropical is incorrect. fact15: Andi does knight predicator if Andi is not subtropical. fact16: If that Kabbalist is a kind of a Filicinae then that cranesbill meanders allusiveness. fact17: If Andi is not subtropical Andi knights predicator and this is efficient. ; $hypothesis$ = Andi is efficient. ; $proof$ =

fact17 & fact7 -> int1: Andi does knight predicator and he/she is efficient.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This alum does not mow USA.

¬{C}{b}

fact1: The fact that that cd is not a kind of a facet but that is etymological is wrong. fact2: The fact that some person does not upraise Mysis but it middles Mawlamyine is false if it is cyclopean. fact3: If some man does not upraise Mysis then that she is both a phalacrosis and chromatic is false. fact4: Some person is Malthusian or is bracteate or both if it is not etymological. fact5: That something is non-cursorial but not insentient is true if this thing is bracteate. fact6: If that suburbanite is a kind of a Sappho then this alum does not mow USA. fact7: If some man is a kind of non-cursorial man that is sentient it is cyclopean. fact8: Tammie is cyclopean if this fortune is cyclopean. fact9: If that suburbanite is a Sappho and/or she marches then this alum does not mow USA. fact10: Some person marches if it mows USA and it is not a Sappho. fact11: Something is a kind of a Sappho and marches if it is not chromatic. fact12: If the fact that this llano is chromatic is not incorrect it mows USA and is not a Sappho. fact13: If that that cd is not a facet but it is etymological does not hold the fact that it is not etymological is true. fact14: This alum is a Ezekias and/or mows USA. fact15: If that Tammie does not upraise Mysis and middles Mawlamyine is false this clivers does not upraise Mysis. fact16: That suburbanite is not chromatic if that this clivers is both a phalacrosis and chromatic does not hold. fact17: This fortune is bracteate if that cd is Malthusian. fact18: This stop mows USA. fact19: This alum does mow USA if that suburbanite is a kind of a Sappho.

fact1: ¬(¬{N}{f} & {L}{f}) fact2: (x): {G}x -> ¬(¬{E}x & {H}x) fact3: (x): ¬{E}x -> ¬({F}x & {D}x) fact4: (x): ¬{L}x -> ({M}x v {K}x) fact5: (x): {K}x -> (¬{I}x & {J}x) fact6: {A}{a} -> ¬{C}{b} fact7: (x): (¬{I}x & {J}x) -> {G}x fact8: {G}{e} -> {G}{d} fact9: ({A}{a} v {B}{a}) -> ¬{C}{b} fact10: (x): ({C}x & ¬{A}x) -> {B}x fact11: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({A}x & {B}x) fact12: {D}{hk} -> ({C}{hk} & ¬{A}{hk}) fact13: ¬(¬{N}{f} & {L}{f}) -> ¬{L}{f} fact14: ({DF}{b} v {C}{b}) fact15: ¬(¬{E}{d} & {H}{d}) -> ¬{E}{c} fact16: ¬({F}{c} & {D}{c}) -> ¬{D}{a} fact17: {M}{f} -> {K}{e} fact18: {C}{u} fact19: {A}{a} -> {C}{b}

This alum mows USA.

{C}{b}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that that cd is not a kind of a facet but that is etymological is wrong. fact2: The fact that some person does not upraise Mysis but it middles Mawlamyine is false if it is cyclopean. fact3: If some man does not upraise Mysis then that she is both a phalacrosis and chromatic is false. fact4: Some person is Malthusian or is bracteate or both if it is not etymological. fact5: That something is non-cursorial but not insentient is true if this thing is bracteate. fact6: If that suburbanite is a kind of a Sappho then this alum does not mow USA. fact7: If some man is a kind of non-cursorial man that is sentient it is cyclopean. fact8: Tammie is cyclopean if this fortune is cyclopean. fact9: If that suburbanite is a Sappho and/or she marches then this alum does not mow USA. fact10: Some person marches if it mows USA and it is not a Sappho. fact11: Something is a kind of a Sappho and marches if it is not chromatic. fact12: If the fact that this llano is chromatic is not incorrect it mows USA and is not a Sappho. fact13: If that that cd is not a facet but it is etymological does not hold the fact that it is not etymological is true. fact14: This alum is a Ezekias and/or mows USA. fact15: If that Tammie does not upraise Mysis and middles Mawlamyine is false this clivers does not upraise Mysis. fact16: That suburbanite is not chromatic if that this clivers is both a phalacrosis and chromatic does not hold. fact17: This fortune is bracteate if that cd is Malthusian. fact18: This stop mows USA. fact19: This alum does mow USA if that suburbanite is a kind of a Sappho. ; $hypothesis$ = This alum does not mow USA. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That laundryman is a daybreak.

{A}{a}

fact1: If something that is not a Vermeer is a leprechaun it is not a kind of a daybreak. fact2: Some person is not a Vermeer if that that person does zip pentagon and that person is a Vermeer does not hold. fact3: That laundryman is a daybreak.

fact1: (x): (¬{B}x & {C}x) -> ¬{A}x fact2: (x): ¬({D}x & {B}x) -> ¬{B}x fact3: {A}{a}

That laundryman is not a daybreak.

¬{A}{a}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If something that is not a Vermeer is a leprechaun it is not a kind of a daybreak. fact2: Some person is not a Vermeer if that that person does zip pentagon and that person is a Vermeer does not hold. fact3: That laundryman is a daybreak. ; $hypothesis$ = That laundryman is a daybreak. ; $proof$ =

fact3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

Everything is a Scranton.

(x): {A}x

fact1: Everything is a Scranton.

fact1: (x): {A}x

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: Everything is a Scranton. ; $hypothesis$ = Everything is a Scranton. ; $proof$ =

fact1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That graining occurs.

{C}

fact1: This derecognizing EHF occurs. fact2: That this derecognizing EHF occurs and that yawing happens prevents that graining. fact3: That yawing happens. fact4: That graining occurs and this derecognizing EHF occurs if that yawing does not occurs.

fact1: {A} fact2: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} fact3: {B} fact4: ¬{B} -> ({C} & {A})

That graining occurs.

{C}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This derecognizing EHF occurs. fact2: That this derecognizing EHF occurs and that yawing happens prevents that graining. fact3: That yawing happens. fact4: That graining occurs and this derecognizing EHF occurs if that yawing does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That graining occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact1 & fact3 -> int1: This derecognizing EHF and that yawing occurs.; int1 & fact2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This mentoring anaphor occurs.

{A}

fact1: This mentoring anaphor happens if that unstrapping Eisenstaedt occurs. fact2: That this retiring Phaethontidae does not happens leads to that this mussitating Chondrus does not occurs and the naturalisation does not occurs. fact3: That this quarrying Chelifer does not happens is triggered by that the temptation does not happens. fact4: The fact that that triumphalness occurs hold if that that triumphalness does not occurs and that clanking patness does not happens is false. fact5: Notthe Ottomanness but that unstrapping Eisenstaedt happens if that cowling ENL does not occurs. fact6: This buffeting Housman occurs. fact7: This licensing manfulness and the bionomicness happens. fact8: If this mussitating Chondrus does not occurs then that notthis experiment but this weightiness happens hold. fact9: That shambling does not occurs. fact10: If that triumphalness occurs notthat cowling ENL but the anatomy happens. fact11: This buffeting Housman and that final occurs. fact12: If this experiment does not occurs that this unbaptizedness does not happens and this stipendiariness does not happens is right. fact13: If this unbaptizedness does not happens the fact that that triumphalness does not happens and that clanking patness does not happens is not right. fact14: If this buffeting Housman happens and that final occurs that that unstrapping Eisenstaedt does not happens hold. fact15: This mentoring anaphor does not occurs if that that unstrapping Eisenstaedt does not happens is correct.

fact1: {B} -> {A} fact2: ¬{N} -> (¬{L} & ¬{M}) fact3: ¬{CF} -> ¬{GF} fact4: ¬(¬{F} & ¬{G}) -> {F} fact5: ¬{D} -> (¬{C} & {B}) fact6: {AA} fact7: ({IP} & {FD}) fact8: ¬{L} -> (¬{J} & {K}) fact9: ¬{GD} fact10: {F} -> (¬{D} & {E}) fact11: ({AA} & {AB}) fact12: ¬{J} -> (¬{H} & ¬{I}) fact13: ¬{H} -> ¬(¬{F} & ¬{G}) fact14: ({AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} fact15: ¬{B} -> ¬{A}

This mentoring anaphor occurs.

{A}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This mentoring anaphor happens if that unstrapping Eisenstaedt occurs. fact2: That this retiring Phaethontidae does not happens leads to that this mussitating Chondrus does not occurs and the naturalisation does not occurs. fact3: That this quarrying Chelifer does not happens is triggered by that the temptation does not happens. fact4: The fact that that triumphalness occurs hold if that that triumphalness does not occurs and that clanking patness does not happens is false. fact5: Notthe Ottomanness but that unstrapping Eisenstaedt happens if that cowling ENL does not occurs. fact6: This buffeting Housman occurs. fact7: This licensing manfulness and the bionomicness happens. fact8: If this mussitating Chondrus does not occurs then that notthis experiment but this weightiness happens hold. fact9: That shambling does not occurs. fact10: If that triumphalness occurs notthat cowling ENL but the anatomy happens. fact11: This buffeting Housman and that final occurs. fact12: If this experiment does not occurs that this unbaptizedness does not happens and this stipendiariness does not happens is right. fact13: If this unbaptizedness does not happens the fact that that triumphalness does not happens and that clanking patness does not happens is not right. fact14: If this buffeting Housman happens and that final occurs that that unstrapping Eisenstaedt does not happens hold. fact15: This mentoring anaphor does not occurs if that that unstrapping Eisenstaedt does not happens is correct. ; $hypothesis$ = This mentoring anaphor occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact14 & fact11 -> int1: That unstrapping Eisenstaedt does not occurs.; int1 & fact15 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This backsword is not a patronymic.

¬{B}{b}

fact1: This shirting is not an acidosis if this conglutination does reason chafing and is not an acidosis. fact2: This backsword is a kind of a patronymic if that this backsword tears Chara and the thing eases Automeris is true. fact3: This microsome is not nonprotractile. fact4: This backsword does not tear Chara and eases Automeris if this microsome is not nonprotractile. fact5: If this microsome does not tear Chara and is a patronymic it is nonprotractile. fact6: Someone heals dyspepsia and/or it is not a kind of a stable if it is not an acidosis. fact7: If something does tear Chara and that thing eases Automeris that thing is a patronymic. fact8: This freedwoman is unrealistic and it does not mangle ectasia if that carnelian does heal dyspepsia. fact9: If this gari does not call morals this conglutination reasons chafing and is not an acidosis. fact10: There exists something such that that the thing is a mooring and not a Guinean does not hold. fact11: This backsword does not tear Chara if this microsome is not nonprotractile. fact12: This gari does not call morals and does not unfasten Mahdism if the fact that this gari is not a opalescence hold. fact13: This backsword does not tear Chara. fact14: If this backsword does not ease Automeris but it is nonprotractile then it tears Chara. fact15: That carnelian does heal dyspepsia if this shirting heal dyspepsia or it is not a kind of a stable or both. fact16: This backsword is not a kind of a patronymic if this microsome is not a patronymic and dumps emmetropia. fact17: If something is nonprotractile it is not a patronymic and dumps emmetropia.

fact1: ({J}{f} & ¬{G}{f}) -> ¬{G}{e} fact2: ({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) -> {B}{b} fact3: ¬{A}{a} fact4: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact5: (¬{AA}{a} & {B}{a}) -> {A}{a} fact6: (x): ¬{G}x -> ({F}x v ¬{H}x) fact7: (x): ({AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x fact8: {F}{d} -> (¬{D}{c} & ¬{E}{c}) fact9: ¬{I}{g} -> ({J}{f} & ¬{G}{f}) fact10: (Ex): ¬({M}x & ¬{N}x) fact11: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{AA}{b} fact12: ¬{L}{g} -> (¬{I}{g} & ¬{K}{g}) fact13: ¬{AA}{b} fact14: (¬{AB}{b} & {A}{b}) -> {AA}{b} fact15: ({F}{e} v ¬{H}{e}) -> {F}{d} fact16: (¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact17: (x): {A}x -> (¬{B}x & {C}x)

This backsword is not a patronymic.

¬{B}{b}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This shirting is not an acidosis if this conglutination does reason chafing and is not an acidosis. fact2: This backsword is a kind of a patronymic if that this backsword tears Chara and the thing eases Automeris is true. fact3: This microsome is not nonprotractile. fact4: This backsword does not tear Chara and eases Automeris if this microsome is not nonprotractile. fact5: If this microsome does not tear Chara and is a patronymic it is nonprotractile. fact6: Someone heals dyspepsia and/or it is not a kind of a stable if it is not an acidosis. fact7: If something does tear Chara and that thing eases Automeris that thing is a patronymic. fact8: This freedwoman is unrealistic and it does not mangle ectasia if that carnelian does heal dyspepsia. fact9: If this gari does not call morals this conglutination reasons chafing and is not an acidosis. fact10: There exists something such that that the thing is a mooring and not a Guinean does not hold. fact11: This backsword does not tear Chara if this microsome is not nonprotractile. fact12: This gari does not call morals and does not unfasten Mahdism if the fact that this gari is not a opalescence hold. fact13: This backsword does not tear Chara. fact14: If this backsword does not ease Automeris but it is nonprotractile then it tears Chara. fact15: That carnelian does heal dyspepsia if this shirting heal dyspepsia or it is not a kind of a stable or both. fact16: This backsword is not a kind of a patronymic if this microsome is not a patronymic and dumps emmetropia. fact17: If something is nonprotractile it is not a patronymic and dumps emmetropia. ; $hypothesis$ = This backsword is not a patronymic. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This trawler is not a Cynocephalus.

¬{B}{aa}

fact1: The ceratosaur animates Pyongyang if the fact that it is not a Anzio and it is Moresque does not hold. fact2: This trawler is a Cynocephalus if it is not spiritless. fact3: Something is not a Cynocephalus if it is not nonpsychoactive and it is not Moresque. fact4: The fact that this trawler is not a kind of a Cynocephalus and does assume is incorrect. fact5: If that watercolour is not a Iroquoian then this patzer is a counteroffer but it does not beg basketful. fact6: If that something is not unconcealed but it is not collapsible is not correct then it is not a kind of a Iroquoian. fact7: If some man is Moresque the fact that he/she does not pardon eightieth and is spiritless is false. fact8: This trawler does not beg basketful if this patzer is a counteroffer but the person does not beg basketful. fact9: If the fact that something is not nonpsychoactive but it is a Cynocephalus is wrong then it is not spirited. fact10: Something that does not beg basketful is non-nonpsychoactive thing that is not Moresque. fact11: If the fact that someone does not pardon eightieth but it is spiritless is false then the fact that it is a kind of a Cynocephalus is right. fact12: If that something is not a Cynocephalus but it is nonpsychoactive does not hold that it is spiritless hold. fact13: If some person does not derequisition Kuznets it does symmetrise Mirabilis. fact14: That earthenware is Moresque if the fact that that earthenware is not a Agrippina but a dysaphia is incorrect. fact15: This trawler is nonpsychoactive. fact16: If the fact that some man is not a Cynocephalus but she is spiritless does not hold she is nonpsychoactive. fact17: This trawler is Moresque if this trawler is nonpsychoactive. fact18: The fact that some man is psychoactive but the person is spiritless does not hold if the person is Moresque. fact19: That this trawler is not a kind of a Cynocephalus and is Downing is false if it is a blur. fact20: Some man is splintery if that she does not untwist and is a Rachmaninoff does not hold.

fact1: ¬(¬{IO}{db} & {A}{db}) -> {CR}{db} fact2: ¬{AB}{aa} -> {B}{aa} fact3: (x): (¬{C}x & ¬{A}x) -> ¬{B}x fact4: ¬(¬{B}{aa} & {GB}{aa}) fact5: ¬{F}{b} -> ({E}{a} & ¬{D}{a}) fact6: (x): ¬(¬{G}x & {H}x) -> ¬{F}x fact7: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) fact8: ({E}{a} & ¬{D}{a}) -> ¬{D}{aa} fact9: (x): ¬(¬{C}x & {B}x) -> {AB}x fact10: (x): ¬{D}x -> (¬{C}x & ¬{A}x) fact11: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x fact12: (x): ¬(¬{B}x & {C}x) -> {AB}x fact13: (x): ¬{AP}x -> {DF}x fact14: ¬(¬{GS}{ik} & {EE}{ik}) -> {A}{ik} fact15: {C}{aa} fact16: (x): ¬(¬{B}x & {AB}x) -> {C}x fact17: {C}{aa} -> {A}{aa} fact18: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{C}x & {AB}x) fact19: {FG}{aa} -> ¬(¬{B}{aa} & {BF}{aa}) fact20: (x): ¬(¬{HR}x & {AD}x) -> {CH}x

This trawler is not a Cynocephalus.

¬{B}{aa}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The ceratosaur animates Pyongyang if the fact that it is not a Anzio and it is Moresque does not hold. fact2: This trawler is a Cynocephalus if it is not spiritless. fact3: Something is not a Cynocephalus if it is not nonpsychoactive and it is not Moresque. fact4: The fact that this trawler is not a kind of a Cynocephalus and does assume is incorrect. fact5: If that watercolour is not a Iroquoian then this patzer is a counteroffer but it does not beg basketful. fact6: If that something is not unconcealed but it is not collapsible is not correct then it is not a kind of a Iroquoian. fact7: If some man is Moresque the fact that he/she does not pardon eightieth and is spiritless is false. fact8: This trawler does not beg basketful if this patzer is a counteroffer but the person does not beg basketful. fact9: If the fact that something is not nonpsychoactive but it is a Cynocephalus is wrong then it is not spirited. fact10: Something that does not beg basketful is non-nonpsychoactive thing that is not Moresque. fact11: If the fact that someone does not pardon eightieth but it is spiritless is false then the fact that it is a kind of a Cynocephalus is right. fact12: If that something is not a Cynocephalus but it is nonpsychoactive does not hold that it is spiritless hold. fact13: If some person does not derequisition Kuznets it does symmetrise Mirabilis. fact14: That earthenware is Moresque if the fact that that earthenware is not a Agrippina but a dysaphia is incorrect. fact15: This trawler is nonpsychoactive. fact16: If the fact that some man is not a Cynocephalus but she is spiritless does not hold she is nonpsychoactive. fact17: This trawler is Moresque if this trawler is nonpsychoactive. fact18: The fact that some man is psychoactive but the person is spiritless does not hold if the person is Moresque. fact19: That this trawler is not a kind of a Cynocephalus and is Downing is false if it is a blur. fact20: Some man is splintery if that she does not untwist and is a Rachmaninoff does not hold. ; $hypothesis$ = This trawler is not a Cynocephalus. ; $proof$ =

fact7 -> int1: That this trawler does not pardon eightieth and is spiritless is incorrect if it is not non-Moresque.; fact17 & fact15 -> int2: This trawler is Moresque.; int1 & int2 -> int3: The fact that this trawler does not pardon eightieth and is spiritless is incorrect.; fact11 -> int4: This trawler is a Cynocephalus if that this trawler does not pardon eightieth but it is spiritless is false.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That Downing leukaemia happens.

{C}

fact1: That sclerotomy does not occurs if that Dostoyevskianness occurs. fact2: That communization does not happens but the exasperating occurs if this operculateness does not happens. fact3: That instrumentating knottiness happens and this Milling Mulloidichthys occurs. fact4: Notthe badminton but that nourishing Zetland happens. fact5: That this smoking does not happens and that candoes not occurs is triggered by that that sclerotomy does not occurs. fact6: This launch and the nominating happens if that communization does not happens. fact7: Either that Dostoyevskianness or the non-synaestheticness or both happens if that that nourishing Zetland occurs hold. fact8: That pavage does not occurs if the fact that that archiepiscopalness occurs and that pavage occurs does not hold. fact9: The fact that that instrumentating knottiness does not happens and this Milling Mulloidichthys does not occurs does not hold if this launch occurs. fact10: That that archiepiscopalness happens and that pavage happens is false if that candoes not happens. fact11: If the unadjustedness does not occurs then this operculateness does not happens and the contagion does not happens. fact12: That that pavage does not happens triggers that this prorogation does not happens and/or that this phrasing occurs. fact13: That this prorogation does not happens and/or this phrasing leads to that adjustedness.

fact1: {R} -> ¬{Q} fact2: ¬{H} -> (¬{F} & {G}) fact3: ({A} & {B}) fact4: (¬{U} & {T}) fact5: ¬{Q} -> (¬{P} & ¬{N}) fact6: ¬{F} -> ({D} & {E}) fact7: {T} -> ({R} v ¬{S}) fact8: ¬({O} & {M}) -> ¬{M} fact9: {D} -> ¬(¬{A} & ¬{B}) fact10: ¬{N} -> ¬({O} & {M}) fact11: ¬{J} -> (¬{H} & ¬{I}) fact12: ¬{M} -> (¬{L} v {K}) fact13: (¬{L} v {K}) -> ¬{J}

That Downing leukaemia does not happens.

¬{C}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That sclerotomy does not occurs if that Dostoyevskianness occurs. fact2: That communization does not happens but the exasperating occurs if this operculateness does not happens. fact3: That instrumentating knottiness happens and this Milling Mulloidichthys occurs. fact4: Notthe badminton but that nourishing Zetland happens. fact5: That this smoking does not happens and that candoes not occurs is triggered by that that sclerotomy does not occurs. fact6: This launch and the nominating happens if that communization does not happens. fact7: Either that Dostoyevskianness or the non-synaestheticness or both happens if that that nourishing Zetland occurs hold. fact8: That pavage does not occurs if the fact that that archiepiscopalness occurs and that pavage occurs does not hold. fact9: The fact that that instrumentating knottiness does not happens and this Milling Mulloidichthys does not occurs does not hold if this launch occurs. fact10: That that archiepiscopalness happens and that pavage happens is false if that candoes not happens. fact11: If the unadjustedness does not occurs then this operculateness does not happens and the contagion does not happens. fact12: That that pavage does not happens triggers that this prorogation does not happens and/or that this phrasing occurs. fact13: That this prorogation does not happens and/or this phrasing leads to that adjustedness. ; $hypothesis$ = That Downing leukaemia happens. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This lottery happens.

{C}

fact1: If that this slurping does not happens or that calving Dickens does not occurs or both does not hold the planarness does not happens. fact2: If that calving Dickens happens the fact that this slurping does not occurs but this lottery occurs is not correct. fact3: That calving Dickens does not happens. fact4: That that metastaticness and this splicing Daedalus happens is false. fact5: If this quadrille does not occurs this slurping does not occurs. fact6: That this slurping does not occurs prevents that this lottery does not occurs. fact7: If that this slurping does not happens and this lottery happens is wrong then the fact that this lottery does not happens is true. fact8: That both this quadrille and this soldiering occurs does not hold if that calving Dickens does not occurs. fact9: This slurping does not happens if that both this quadrille and this soldiering happens does not hold. fact10: This lottery does not happens if the fact that that Armageddon and this lottery occurs does not hold.

fact1: ¬(¬{B} v ¬{A}) -> ¬{U} fact2: {A} -> ¬(¬{B} & {C}) fact3: ¬{A} fact4: ¬({P} & {ES}) fact5: ¬{AA} -> ¬{B} fact6: ¬{B} -> {C} fact7: ¬(¬{B} & {C}) -> ¬{C} fact8: ¬{A} -> ¬({AA} & {AB}) fact9: ¬({AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} fact10: ¬({D} & {C}) -> ¬{C}

The planarness does not occurs.

¬{U}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that this slurping does not happens or that calving Dickens does not occurs or both does not hold the planarness does not happens. fact2: If that calving Dickens happens the fact that this slurping does not occurs but this lottery occurs is not correct. fact3: That calving Dickens does not happens. fact4: That that metastaticness and this splicing Daedalus happens is false. fact5: If this quadrille does not occurs this slurping does not occurs. fact6: That this slurping does not occurs prevents that this lottery does not occurs. fact7: If that this slurping does not happens and this lottery happens is wrong then the fact that this lottery does not happens is true. fact8: That both this quadrille and this soldiering occurs does not hold if that calving Dickens does not occurs. fact9: This slurping does not happens if that both this quadrille and this soldiering happens does not hold. fact10: This lottery does not happens if the fact that that Armageddon and this lottery occurs does not hold. ; $hypothesis$ = This lottery happens. ; $proof$ =

fact8 & fact3 -> int1: That this quadrille occurs and this soldiering happens is wrong.; int1 & fact9 -> int2: This slurping does not occurs.; int2 & fact6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That petting is not a secret.

¬{C}{d}

fact1: The fact that either someone is a secret or she is unorthodox or both is wrong if she does not sediment proprietorship. fact2: If that energid is orthodox then that petting is a kind of a secret. fact3: the proprietorship does sediment brooklet. fact4: The fact that Nicola cloisters blob but it does not attach outlandishness is wrong if that this brooklet sediments proprietorship is true. fact5: This brooklet does sediment proprietorship. fact6: If Nicola attaches outlandishness that energid is orthodox. fact7: That energid is not unorthodox if the fact that Nicola cloisters blob but it does not attach outlandishness does not hold. fact8: The fact that Nicola cloisters blob and it attaches outlandishness is false. fact9: If that this brooklet is a secret and/or it is not orthodox does not hold the fact that that petting is not a secret is correct. fact10: The fact that Nicola does cloister blob and attaches outlandishness does not hold if this brooklet sediments proprietorship.

fact1: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({C}x v ¬{B}x) fact2: {B}{c} -> {C}{d} fact3: {AC}{aa} fact4: {A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact5: {A}{a} fact6: {AB}{b} -> {B}{c} fact7: ¬({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) -> {B}{c} fact8: ¬({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact9: ¬({C}{a} v ¬{B}{a}) -> ¬{C}{d} fact10: {A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{b} & {AB}{b})

That petting is not a secret.

¬{C}{d}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that either someone is a secret or she is unorthodox or both is wrong if she does not sediment proprietorship. fact2: If that energid is orthodox then that petting is a kind of a secret. fact3: the proprietorship does sediment brooklet. fact4: The fact that Nicola cloisters blob but it does not attach outlandishness is wrong if that this brooklet sediments proprietorship is true. fact5: This brooklet does sediment proprietorship. fact6: If Nicola attaches outlandishness that energid is orthodox. fact7: That energid is not unorthodox if the fact that Nicola cloisters blob but it does not attach outlandishness does not hold. fact8: The fact that Nicola cloisters blob and it attaches outlandishness is false. fact9: If that this brooklet is a secret and/or it is not orthodox does not hold the fact that that petting is not a secret is correct. fact10: The fact that Nicola does cloister blob and attaches outlandishness does not hold if this brooklet sediments proprietorship. ; $hypothesis$ = That petting is not a secret. ; $proof$ =

fact4 & fact5 -> int1: That Nicola cloisters blob but it does not attach outlandishness is incorrect.; int1 & fact7 -> int2: That energid is orthodox.; int2 & fact2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This schnoz is not unstoppable and is not astral.

(¬{A}{aa} & ¬{B}{aa})

fact1: This schnoz is not likable and it is not a Locke. fact2: This schnoz is not unstoppable. fact3: The fact that something is stoppable and is not astral does not hold if that thing is not non-cutting. fact4: If something is unstoppable then it does not disappoint day and does not dry Parnahiba. fact5: Every man is not unstoppable. fact6: Everyone is both not likable and not a Siwan. fact7: Every person is not galvanic and not a bench. fact8: Everything does not jangle bewitchery and is not a lilliputian.

fact1: (¬{EH}{aa} & ¬{JG}{aa}) fact2: ¬{A}{aa} fact3: (x): {C}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & ¬{B}x) fact4: (x): {A}x -> (¬{GA}x & ¬{IO}x) fact5: (x): ¬{A}x fact6: (x): (¬{EH}x & ¬{HK}x) fact7: (x): (¬{JF}x & ¬{DE}x) fact8: (x): (¬{HD}x & ¬{II}x)

That this schnoz is not unstoppable and it is not astral is wrong.

¬(¬{A}{aa} & ¬{B}{aa})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This schnoz is not likable and it is not a Locke. fact2: This schnoz is not unstoppable. fact3: The fact that something is stoppable and is not astral does not hold if that thing is not non-cutting. fact4: If something is unstoppable then it does not disappoint day and does not dry Parnahiba. fact5: Every man is not unstoppable. fact6: Everyone is both not likable and not a Siwan. fact7: Every person is not galvanic and not a bench. fact8: Everything does not jangle bewitchery and is not a lilliputian. ; $hypothesis$ = This schnoz is not unstoppable and is not astral. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This briefs flaws UNICEF.

{AA}{b}

fact1: That that scincid is not a Chagall is not incorrect. fact2: This briefs does not flaw UNICEF and is a kind of a Chagall if that scincid inveigles. fact3: Somebody does not flaw UNICEF if the fact that she/he does not inveigle and she/he flaw UNICEF is wrong. fact4: This briefs is a kind of a Chagall. fact5: That scincid inveigles.

fact1: ¬{AB}{a} fact2: {A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact3: (x): ¬(¬{A}x & {AA}x) -> ¬{AA}x fact4: {AB}{b} fact5: {A}{a}

That break does not flaw UNICEF.

¬{AA}{eq}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That that scincid is not a Chagall is not incorrect. fact2: This briefs does not flaw UNICEF and is a kind of a Chagall if that scincid inveigles. fact3: Somebody does not flaw UNICEF if the fact that she/he does not inveigle and she/he flaw UNICEF is wrong. fact4: This briefs is a kind of a Chagall. fact5: That scincid inveigles. ; $hypothesis$ = This briefs flaws UNICEF. ; $proof$ =

fact2 & fact5 -> int1: This briefs does not flaw UNICEF and is a kind of a Chagall.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

The benthonicness occurs.

{C}

fact1: That this comprehending Scutigera does not happens leads to that this comprehending Scutigera does not occurs and the benthonicness does not happens. fact2: The fact that this comprehending Scutigera does not happens but that piggyback occurs is wrong if the benthonicness happens. fact3: That arthrosporicness does not occurs if the fact that notthis comprehending Scutigera but that piggyback happens does not hold. fact4: The fact that the terreneness does not happens and/or the isosmoticness happens does not hold. fact5: That the terreneness occurs is not wrong.

fact1: ¬{B} -> (¬{B} & ¬{C}) fact2: {C} -> ¬(¬{B} & {A}) fact3: ¬(¬{B} & {A}) -> ¬{GK} fact4: ¬(¬{AA} v {AB}) fact5: {AA}

That arthrosporicness does not happens.

¬{GK}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That this comprehending Scutigera does not happens leads to that this comprehending Scutigera does not occurs and the benthonicness does not happens. fact2: The fact that this comprehending Scutigera does not happens but that piggyback occurs is wrong if the benthonicness happens. fact3: That arthrosporicness does not occurs if the fact that notthis comprehending Scutigera but that piggyback happens does not hold. fact4: The fact that the terreneness does not happens and/or the isosmoticness happens does not hold. fact5: That the terreneness occurs is not wrong. ; $hypothesis$ = The benthonicness occurs. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That parasol does not spellbinding and is a Negev.

(¬{C}{c} & {A}{c})

fact1: The fact that this telomerase is a cheerlessness and not burglarious does not hold. fact2: That that parasol is tasteful and is not a disinformation is false. fact3: That parasol is a kind of a Negev if that thug is not a enamoredness. fact4: That mineralocorticoid pilots unsteadiness. fact5: The fact that that parasol does not spellbinding is correct if that that parasol is a declarative but it is not a mortality does not hold. fact6: That that that parasol does not spellbinding and is a kind of a Negev does not hold hold if this telomerase is not a enamoredness. fact7: That mineralocorticoid spellbindings if that mineralocorticoid agglutinates U.S.A. and is not a kind of a Teach. fact8: That mineralocorticoid is a mortality and it is a kind of a Persian if the Elspar is not a fleetingness. fact9: If this telomerase is not a kind of a enamoredness that parasol is burglarious and it is a Negev. fact10: The fact that this telomerase is not a cheerlessness and the thing is non-burglarious does not hold. fact11: If that parasol is a mortality then that parasol does not spellbinding. fact12: There exists nobody such that it is fatal and it is not a kind of a Chapultepec. fact13: There is no man that is a kind of a declarative and is not a mortality. fact14: That mineralocorticoid agglutinates U.S.A. and is not a Teach if it does pilot unsteadiness. fact15: If the fact that someone does not spellbinding is true then she is not a enamoredness and not a declarative. fact16: That thug is not a mortality. fact17: That thug is not a kind of a enamoredness if that this telomerase is not a cheerlessness and not burglarious does not hold. fact18: If that that thug does not spellbinding and it is not a enamoredness is wrong then that this telomerase is not a cheerlessness is right. fact19: This thawing is not a declarative. fact20: That this telomerase does not spellbinding and is a cheerlessness does not hold. fact21: That thug does not spellbinding if that mineralocorticoid spellbinding and is a mortality.

fact1: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact2: ¬({EC}{c} & ¬{HA}{c}) fact3: ¬{B}{b} -> {A}{c} fact4: {K}{d} fact5: ¬({D}{c} & ¬{E}{c}) -> ¬{C}{c} fact6: ¬{B}{a} -> ¬(¬{C}{c} & {A}{c}) fact7: ({J}{d} & ¬{I}{d}) -> {C}{d} fact8: ¬{G}{e} -> ({E}{d} & {F}{d}) fact9: ¬{B}{a} -> ({AB}{c} & {A}{c}) fact10: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact11: {E}{c} -> ¬{C}{c} fact12: (x): ¬({CR}x & ¬{N}x) fact13: (x): ¬({D}x & ¬{E}x) fact14: {K}{d} -> ({J}{d} & ¬{I}{d}) fact15: (x): ¬{C}x -> (¬{B}x & ¬{D}x) fact16: ¬{E}{b} fact17: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact18: ¬(¬{C}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) -> ¬{AA}{a} fact19: ¬{D}{dd} fact20: ¬(¬{C}{a} & {AA}{a}) fact21: ({C}{d} & {E}{d}) -> ¬{C}{b}

That that parasol is burglarious is correct.

{AB}{c}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that this telomerase is a cheerlessness and not burglarious does not hold. fact2: That that parasol is tasteful and is not a disinformation is false. fact3: That parasol is a kind of a Negev if that thug is not a enamoredness. fact4: That mineralocorticoid pilots unsteadiness. fact5: The fact that that parasol does not spellbinding is correct if that that parasol is a declarative but it is not a mortality does not hold. fact6: That that that parasol does not spellbinding and is a kind of a Negev does not hold hold if this telomerase is not a enamoredness. fact7: That mineralocorticoid spellbindings if that mineralocorticoid agglutinates U.S.A. and is not a kind of a Teach. fact8: That mineralocorticoid is a mortality and it is a kind of a Persian if the Elspar is not a fleetingness. fact9: If this telomerase is not a kind of a enamoredness that parasol is burglarious and it is a Negev. fact10: The fact that this telomerase is not a cheerlessness and the thing is non-burglarious does not hold. fact11: If that parasol is a mortality then that parasol does not spellbinding. fact12: There exists nobody such that it is fatal and it is not a kind of a Chapultepec. fact13: There is no man that is a kind of a declarative and is not a mortality. fact14: That mineralocorticoid agglutinates U.S.A. and is not a Teach if it does pilot unsteadiness. fact15: If the fact that someone does not spellbinding is true then she is not a enamoredness and not a declarative. fact16: That thug is not a mortality. fact17: That thug is not a kind of a enamoredness if that this telomerase is not a cheerlessness and not burglarious does not hold. fact18: If that that thug does not spellbinding and it is not a enamoredness is wrong then that this telomerase is not a cheerlessness is right. fact19: This thawing is not a declarative. fact20: That this telomerase does not spellbinding and is a cheerlessness does not hold. fact21: That thug does not spellbinding if that mineralocorticoid spellbinding and is a mortality. ; $hypothesis$ = That parasol does not spellbinding and is a Negev. ; $proof$ =

fact17 & fact10 -> int1: That thug is not a enamoredness.; int1 & fact3 -> int2: That parasol is a Negev.; fact13 -> int3: The fact that that parasol is a declarative but she/he is not a mortality is false.; int3 & fact5 -> int4: That parasol does not spellbinding.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That Timorese is a Ephemeridae.

{B}{b}

fact1: Something that does not whirligig Pipile is not a Ephemeridae. fact2: That something is a sup that is not a gag is wrong if this is not a kind of a hostile. fact3: That this bandit links excessiveness hold. fact4: The fact that that Congregationalist is a sup is correct if that the fact that this bandit is a sup but not a gag hold is false. fact5: This elytron is a kind of a Ephemeridae if that Timorese is dispensable and/or CODS Spatangoida. fact6: Either this elytron is indispensable or it CODS Spatangoida or both. fact7: That some man is a cent that is a Ephemeridae is wrong if the one does not bow Harpia. fact8: That Timorese is a Ephemeridae if this elytron is dispensable and/or it CODS Spatangoida. fact9: If that Timorese is dispensable this elytron is not dispensable. fact10: This mujik is indispensable if this elytron is not indispensable. fact11: If this elytron is not indispensable that Timorese is a Ephemeridae. fact12: If either something is vacuolated or this is a sup or both then this does not bow Harpia. fact13: If this bandit links excessiveness and it is a Platalea it is not a hostile. fact14: If that trumpeter is a Ephemeridae that Timorese is dispensable and whirligigs Pipile. fact15: This elytron is not indispensable or it CODS Spatangoida or both. fact16: If that some man is a kind of a cent that is a kind of a Ephemeridae does not hold then it is not a Ephemeridae. fact17: If that Congregationalist is not a Ephemeridae that trumpeter is a kind of a Ephemeridae.

fact1: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬{B}x fact2: (x): ¬{G}x -> ¬({E}x & ¬{H}x) fact3: {J}{e} fact4: ¬({E}{e} & ¬{H}{e}) -> {E}{d} fact5: (¬{AA}{b} v {AB}{b}) -> {B}{a} fact6: ({AA}{a} v {AB}{a}) fact7: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬({D}x & {B}x) fact8: (¬{AA}{a} v {AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} fact9: ¬{AA}{b} -> ¬{AA}{a} fact10: ¬{AA}{a} -> {AA}{du} fact11: ¬{AA}{a} -> {B}{b} fact12: (x): ({F}x v {E}x) -> ¬{C}x fact13: ({J}{e} & {I}{e}) -> ¬{G}{e} fact14: {B}{c} -> (¬{AA}{b} & {A}{b}) fact15: (¬{AA}{a} v {AB}{a}) fact16: (x): ¬({D}x & {B}x) -> ¬{B}x fact17: ¬{B}{d} -> {B}{c}

That Timorese is not a kind of a Ephemeridae.

¬{B}{b}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Something that does not whirligig Pipile is not a Ephemeridae. fact2: That something is a sup that is not a gag is wrong if this is not a kind of a hostile. fact3: That this bandit links excessiveness hold. fact4: The fact that that Congregationalist is a sup is correct if that the fact that this bandit is a sup but not a gag hold is false. fact5: This elytron is a kind of a Ephemeridae if that Timorese is dispensable and/or CODS Spatangoida. fact6: Either this elytron is indispensable or it CODS Spatangoida or both. fact7: That some man is a cent that is a Ephemeridae is wrong if the one does not bow Harpia. fact8: That Timorese is a Ephemeridae if this elytron is dispensable and/or it CODS Spatangoida. fact9: If that Timorese is dispensable this elytron is not dispensable. fact10: This mujik is indispensable if this elytron is not indispensable. fact11: If this elytron is not indispensable that Timorese is a Ephemeridae. fact12: If either something is vacuolated or this is a sup or both then this does not bow Harpia. fact13: If this bandit links excessiveness and it is a Platalea it is not a hostile. fact14: If that trumpeter is a Ephemeridae that Timorese is dispensable and whirligigs Pipile. fact15: This elytron is not indispensable or it CODS Spatangoida or both. fact16: If that some man is a kind of a cent that is a kind of a Ephemeridae does not hold then it is not a Ephemeridae. fact17: If that Congregationalist is not a Ephemeridae that trumpeter is a kind of a Ephemeridae. ; $hypothesis$ = That Timorese is a Ephemeridae. ; $proof$ =

fact8 & fact15 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That whooper is a periodical and progestational.

({C}{a} & {A}{a})

fact1: The appropriator is a garbed and the one does hatch. fact2: If something Aideses Pseudopleuronectes it is a deixis. fact3: The fact that someone is a periodical and the one is progestational does not hold if the one is not a lilangeni. fact4: That whooper is a periodical and it hatches. fact5: That whooper is a Hermannia. fact6: That whooper is a kind of a lilangeni and is a kind of a softheartedness. fact7: The Kshatriya is a kind of a lilangeni. fact8: That that whooper is progestational and it is a lilangeni is right. fact9: That whooper does not hatch and is not a lilangeni if the fact that Izzy is a kind of a deixis hold.

fact1: ({CR}{du} & {D}{du}) fact2: (x): {F}x -> {E}x fact3: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬({C}x & {A}x) fact4: ({C}{a} & {D}{a}) fact5: {FG}{a} fact6: ({B}{a} & {CS}{a}) fact7: {B}{gb} fact8: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact9: {E}{b} -> (¬{D}{a} & ¬{B}{a})

That that whooper is a periodical and it is not non-progestational is wrong.

¬({C}{a} & {A}{a})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The appropriator is a garbed and the one does hatch. fact2: If something Aideses Pseudopleuronectes it is a deixis. fact3: The fact that someone is a periodical and the one is progestational does not hold if the one is not a lilangeni. fact4: That whooper is a periodical and it hatches. fact5: That whooper is a Hermannia. fact6: That whooper is a kind of a lilangeni and is a kind of a softheartedness. fact7: The Kshatriya is a kind of a lilangeni. fact8: That that whooper is progestational and it is a lilangeni is right. fact9: That whooper does not hatch and is not a lilangeni if the fact that Izzy is a kind of a deixis hold. ; $hypothesis$ = That whooper is a periodical and progestational. ; $proof$ =

fact8 -> int1: That whooper is progestational.; fact4 -> int2: That whooper is a kind of a periodical.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That everything wraps Hotei does not hold.

¬((x): {A}x)

fact1: Everything is preclinical.

fact1: (x): {CD}x

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Everything is preclinical. ; $hypothesis$ = That everything wraps Hotei does not hold. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That this filicide is anestric and is not systolic is not true.

¬({D}{b} & ¬{C}{b})

fact1: Some man is anestric and not systolic if it is a imperviousness. fact2: If this filicide is a Derain the fact that this filicide is a imperviousness is right. fact3: If some person is not a solvency that it is not a dead and/or it does not oxidise is incorrect. fact4: If the fact that this filicide is not a dead or does not oxidise or both is incorrect it is auricular. fact5: If some person is not a imperviousness but she/he is an escort she/he is not a xxi. fact6: This slating is not a xxi. fact7: This filicide is not a kind of a imperviousness but it is an escort if it is auricular. fact8: If something is not a xxi then the fact that that thing is anestric and that thing is non-systolic is incorrect. fact9: This filicide is not a solvency if this slating is not a Bambusa. fact10: If that this slating is not a xxi is not incorrect that this filicide is a theatricality but it is not a Derain does not hold. fact11: If that something is a kind of a theatricality that is not a Derain is wrong it is a kind of a imperviousness.

fact1: (x): {B}x -> ({D}x & ¬{C}x) fact2: {AB}{b} -> {B}{b} fact3: (x): ¬{I}x -> ¬(¬{H}x v ¬{G}x) fact4: ¬(¬{H}{b} v ¬{G}{b}) -> {F}{b} fact5: (x): (¬{B}x & {E}x) -> ¬{A}x fact6: ¬{A}{a} fact7: {F}{b} -> (¬{B}{b} & {E}{b}) fact8: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({D}x & ¬{C}x) fact9: ¬{J}{a} -> ¬{I}{b} fact10: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact11: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x

That this filicide is anestric and is not systolic is not true.

¬({D}{b} & ¬{C}{b})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Some man is anestric and not systolic if it is a imperviousness. fact2: If this filicide is a Derain the fact that this filicide is a imperviousness is right. fact3: If some person is not a solvency that it is not a dead and/or it does not oxidise is incorrect. fact4: If the fact that this filicide is not a dead or does not oxidise or both is incorrect it is auricular. fact5: If some person is not a imperviousness but she/he is an escort she/he is not a xxi. fact6: This slating is not a xxi. fact7: This filicide is not a kind of a imperviousness but it is an escort if it is auricular. fact8: If something is not a xxi then the fact that that thing is anestric and that thing is non-systolic is incorrect. fact9: This filicide is not a solvency if this slating is not a Bambusa. fact10: If that this slating is not a xxi is not incorrect that this filicide is a theatricality but it is not a Derain does not hold. fact11: If that something is a kind of a theatricality that is not a Derain is wrong it is a kind of a imperviousness. ; $hypothesis$ = That this filicide is anestric and is not systolic is not true. ; $proof$ =

fact10 & fact6 -> int1: The fact that this filicide is a theatricality and is not a Derain is wrong.; fact11 -> int2: This filicide is a imperviousness if the fact that it is a theatricality but not a Derain does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This filicide is a imperviousness.; fact1 -> int4: This filicide is anestric person that is not systolic if this filicide is a kind of a imperviousness.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__