version
stringclasses 1
value | hypothesis
stringlengths 10
229
| hypothesis_formula
stringlengths 3
39
| facts
stringlengths 0
3.08k
| facts_formula
stringlengths 0
908
| proofs
sequencelengths 0
1
| proofs_formula
sequencelengths 0
1
| negative_hypothesis
stringlengths 10
203
⌀ | negative_hypothesis_formula
stringlengths 3
37
⌀ | negative_proofs
sequencelengths 0
1
| negative_original_tree_depth
int64 0
27
⌀ | original_tree_depth
int64 1
3
| depth
int64 0
3
⌀ | num_formula_distractors
int64 0
22
| num_translation_distractors
int64 0
0
| num_all_distractors
int64 0
22
| proof_label
stringclasses 3
values | negative_proof_label
stringclasses 2
values | world_assump_label
stringclasses 3
values | negative_world_assump_label
stringclasses 2
values | prompt_serial
stringlengths 76
3.25k
| proof_serial
stringlengths 11
798
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.3 | That fetoprotein is not inculpatory. | ¬{B}{c} | fact1: If that this richweed is a kind of a anarthria that befouls does not hold then this richweed is not a kind of a Entomophthoraceae. fact2: If this proboscidian is not Parthian then that that lefthander is not nonionic or is non-resinated or both does not hold. fact3: If the fact that the fact that this proboscidian is not nonionic or not resinated or both hold is false then that lefthander is not non-Parthian. fact4: That lefthander is not ionized if this proboscidian is not Parthian. fact5: The animalculum is not nonionic. fact6: That that lefthander is non-Parthian or the person is not inculpatory or both is wrong if that fetoprotein is not resinated. fact7: That fetoprotein is not inculpatory if this proboscidian is Parthian. fact8: That lefthander is unobtrusive. fact9: There exists none such that it is a anarthria and befouls. fact10: The fact that something is not a quintet and it is not a DPhil is wrong if the fact that it outstares free is not wrong. fact11: If that lefthander is not a Sciurus the fact that this proboscidian is not sisterly and that thing does not beget Caelum does not hold. fact12: Someone is Parthian if the fact that it is not sisterly and it does not beget Caelum is wrong. fact13: That lefthander is inculpatory if that either that fetoprotein is resinated or it is not nonionic or both is incorrect. fact14: That the fact that this proboscidian is not inculpatory and/or the person is non-Parthian hold is wrong if that fetoprotein is not nonionic. fact15: If that that isarithm does not sexualise overshot and it does not unfit is incorrect that lefthander does outstare free. fact16: If something does force that the thing does not sexualise overshot and does not unfit does not hold. fact17: That this proboscidian is not pudendal or not resinated or both does not hold. fact18: Something is not a Sciurus if the fact that this thing is not a quintet and is not a DPhil does not hold. fact19: If this richweed forces then that isarithm forces. fact20: That fetoprotein is inculpatory if the fact that that lefthander is not nonionic and/or is not resinated is false. fact21: The fact that that lefthander is not androgynous and/or it is not nonionic is false. fact22: If somebody is not a Entomophthoraceae then either it forces or it is a milepost or both. fact23: This proboscidian is not Parthian. | fact1: ¬({O}{e} & {N}{e}) -> ¬{L}{e} fact2: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} v ¬{AB}{b}) fact3: ¬(¬{AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) -> {A}{b} fact4: ¬{A}{a} -> {AA}{b} fact5: ¬{AA}{bh} fact6: ¬{AB}{c} -> ¬(¬{A}{b} v ¬{B}{b}) fact7: {A}{a} -> ¬{B}{c} fact8: {JD}{b} fact9: (x): ¬({O}x & {N}x) fact10: (x): {H}x -> ¬(¬{G}x & ¬{F}x) fact11: ¬{E}{b} -> ¬(¬{D}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) fact12: (x): ¬(¬{D}x & ¬{C}x) -> {A}x fact13: ¬({AB}{c} v ¬{AA}{c}) -> {B}{b} fact14: ¬{AA}{c} -> ¬(¬{B}{a} v ¬{A}{a}) fact15: ¬(¬{J}{d} & ¬{I}{d}) -> {H}{b} fact16: (x): {K}x -> ¬(¬{J}x & ¬{I}x) fact17: ¬(¬{ID}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) fact18: (x): ¬(¬{G}x & ¬{F}x) -> ¬{E}x fact19: {K}{e} -> {K}{d} fact20: ¬(¬{AA}{b} v ¬{AB}{b}) -> {B}{c} fact21: ¬(¬{AD}{b} v ¬{AA}{b}) fact22: (x): ¬{L}x -> ({K}x v {M}x) fact23: ¬{A}{a} | [
"fact2 & fact23 -> int1: The fact that that lefthander is either not nonionic or not resinated or both is incorrect.; int1 & fact20 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact2 & fact23 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{b} v ¬{AB}{b}); int1 & fact20 -> hypothesis;"
] | That fetoprotein is not inculpatory. | ¬{B}{c} | [
"fact26 -> int2: If that this proboscidian is a kind of non-sisterly man that does not beget Caelum does not hold then this proboscidian is Parthian.; fact25 -> int3: If that that lefthander is not a kind of a quintet and it is not a kind of a DPhil is not true that lefthander is not a kind of a Sciurus.; fact34 -> int4: If that lefthander does outstare free then that that lefthander is both not a quintet and not a DPhil does not hold.; fact31 -> int5: The fact that that isarithm does not sexualise overshot and does not unfit does not hold if it forces.; fact30 -> int6: If that this richweed is not a Entomophthoraceae is not false it forces and/or it is a milepost.; fact32 -> int7: That this richweed is a kind of a anarthria that does befoul does not hold.; fact33 & int7 -> int8: This richweed is not a Entomophthoraceae.; int6 & int8 -> int9: This richweed forces or is a milepost or both.;"
] | 11 | 2 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 20 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If that this richweed is a kind of a anarthria that befouls does not hold then this richweed is not a kind of a Entomophthoraceae. fact2: If this proboscidian is not Parthian then that that lefthander is not nonionic or is non-resinated or both does not hold. fact3: If the fact that the fact that this proboscidian is not nonionic or not resinated or both hold is false then that lefthander is not non-Parthian. fact4: That lefthander is not ionized if this proboscidian is not Parthian. fact5: The animalculum is not nonionic. fact6: That that lefthander is non-Parthian or the person is not inculpatory or both is wrong if that fetoprotein is not resinated. fact7: That fetoprotein is not inculpatory if this proboscidian is Parthian. fact8: That lefthander is unobtrusive. fact9: There exists none such that it is a anarthria and befouls. fact10: The fact that something is not a quintet and it is not a DPhil is wrong if the fact that it outstares free is not wrong. fact11: If that lefthander is not a Sciurus the fact that this proboscidian is not sisterly and that thing does not beget Caelum does not hold. fact12: Someone is Parthian if the fact that it is not sisterly and it does not beget Caelum is wrong. fact13: That lefthander is inculpatory if that either that fetoprotein is resinated or it is not nonionic or both is incorrect. fact14: That the fact that this proboscidian is not inculpatory and/or the person is non-Parthian hold is wrong if that fetoprotein is not nonionic. fact15: If that that isarithm does not sexualise overshot and it does not unfit is incorrect that lefthander does outstare free. fact16: If something does force that the thing does not sexualise overshot and does not unfit does not hold. fact17: That this proboscidian is not pudendal or not resinated or both does not hold. fact18: Something is not a Sciurus if the fact that this thing is not a quintet and is not a DPhil does not hold. fact19: If this richweed forces then that isarithm forces. fact20: That fetoprotein is inculpatory if the fact that that lefthander is not nonionic and/or is not resinated is false. fact21: The fact that that lefthander is not androgynous and/or it is not nonionic is false. fact22: If somebody is not a Entomophthoraceae then either it forces or it is a milepost or both. fact23: This proboscidian is not Parthian. ; $hypothesis$ = That fetoprotein is not inculpatory. ; $proof$ = | fact2 & fact23 -> int1: The fact that that lefthander is either not nonionic or not resinated or both is incorrect.; int1 & fact20 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | This open is realistic but it does not ape lowered. | ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) | fact1: Some person that is neural peoples Cicer and does not exist. fact2: If this open is not non-vulpecular that person is realistic and that person does not ape lowered. fact3: That if this bounder is vulpecular then that this open is realistic but it does not ape lowered is wrong is true. fact4: That tweezer is a Lagomorpha and not a Dubai. fact5: This open does not ape lowered. fact6: That laggard is realistic if this open is not realistic and that is not vulpecular. fact7: If this open is vulpecular then this open does not ape lowered. fact8: If some person does not exist that the one shaves and the one is adducent is not correct. fact9: This bounder is not adducent if that this aeroplane does shave and is adducent is not true. fact10: This aeroplane is neural if this neutralization is not a kind of a SLE and/or the one is not neural. fact11: The fact that this neutralization does not quintuple Endicott and is a SLE is incorrect. fact12: This open is a Iyyar but it is not a kind of a European. fact13: Someone is not realistic and that one is not vulpecular if that one is a fussiness. fact14: If the fact that this neutralization does not quintuple Endicott but he/she is a SLE does not hold then this neutralization is not a kind of a SLE. fact15: That some person is realistic and does not ape lowered is false if it is not vulpecular. fact16: Some person is a fussiness if it is adducent. fact17: This open is vulpecular. fact18: This open does shave if this bounder is neural and does not shave. fact19: This open does register if it is vulpecular. fact20: If Rebekah apes lowered it crabs myositis. fact21: If something is a fussiness it is vulpecular. fact22: This bazooka is a vowel but it does not unbind perspicaciousness. | fact1: (x): {G}x -> ({F}x & ¬{D}x) fact2: {A}{a} -> ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact3: {A}{b} -> ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact4: ({BR}{ag} & ¬{DD}{ag}) fact5: ¬{AB}{a} fact6: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) -> {AA}{ef} fact7: {A}{a} -> ¬{AB}{a} fact8: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬({E}x & {C}x) fact9: ¬({E}{c} & {C}{c}) -> ¬{C}{b} fact10: (¬{H}{d} v ¬{G}{d}) -> {G}{c} fact11: ¬(¬{I}{d} & {H}{d}) fact12: ({ES}{a} & ¬{GG}{a}) fact13: (x): {B}x -> (¬{AA}x & ¬{A}x) fact14: ¬(¬{I}{d} & {H}{d}) -> ¬{H}{d} fact15: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact16: (x): {C}x -> {B}x fact17: {A}{a} fact18: ({G}{b} & ¬{E}{b}) -> {E}{a} fact19: {A}{a} -> {BB}{a} fact20: {AB}{ht} -> {AJ}{ht} fact21: (x): {B}x -> {A}x fact22: ({FN}{gu} & ¬{IK}{gu}) | [
"fact2 & fact17 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact2 & fact17 -> hypothesis;"
] | The fact that this open is realistic but it does not ape lowered is false. | ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) | [] | 5 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 0 | 20 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Some person that is neural peoples Cicer and does not exist. fact2: If this open is not non-vulpecular that person is realistic and that person does not ape lowered. fact3: That if this bounder is vulpecular then that this open is realistic but it does not ape lowered is wrong is true. fact4: That tweezer is a Lagomorpha and not a Dubai. fact5: This open does not ape lowered. fact6: That laggard is realistic if this open is not realistic and that is not vulpecular. fact7: If this open is vulpecular then this open does not ape lowered. fact8: If some person does not exist that the one shaves and the one is adducent is not correct. fact9: This bounder is not adducent if that this aeroplane does shave and is adducent is not true. fact10: This aeroplane is neural if this neutralization is not a kind of a SLE and/or the one is not neural. fact11: The fact that this neutralization does not quintuple Endicott and is a SLE is incorrect. fact12: This open is a Iyyar but it is not a kind of a European. fact13: Someone is not realistic and that one is not vulpecular if that one is a fussiness. fact14: If the fact that this neutralization does not quintuple Endicott but he/she is a SLE does not hold then this neutralization is not a kind of a SLE. fact15: That some person is realistic and does not ape lowered is false if it is not vulpecular. fact16: Some person is a fussiness if it is adducent. fact17: This open is vulpecular. fact18: This open does shave if this bounder is neural and does not shave. fact19: This open does register if it is vulpecular. fact20: If Rebekah apes lowered it crabs myositis. fact21: If something is a fussiness it is vulpecular. fact22: This bazooka is a vowel but it does not unbind perspicaciousness. ; $hypothesis$ = This open is realistic but it does not ape lowered. ; $proof$ = | fact2 & fact17 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That dyestuff does not aggress Astacura and is not an italic. | (¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) | fact1: There exists something such that the fact that it is a beneficiary and non-neutering is false. fact2: Some man is not Scottish if that one does not spite Notoryctus and is a Omayyad. fact3: That dyestuff is not Scottish and this thing does not aggress Astacura. fact4: That dyestuff is not wiry. fact5: If that dyestuff is not a kind of an italic it is not an italic and it is not a parallelogram. fact6: The fact that either that complainant is not non-butyraceous or it is not providential or both does not hold if this forefather is not a kind of a beneficiary. fact7: That dyestuff is non-Scottish thing that does not relate Wynfrith if that dyestuff is non-Scottish. fact8: That dyestuff is not Scottish. fact9: If that complainant is a flaskful then this aegis spites Notoryctus. fact10: The hallucinogen does not aggress Astacura. fact11: Something does not aggress Astacura and it does not rail fashioned if it is Scottish. fact12: If that relations is not sacramental that relations is both not sacramental and not a Pseudechis. fact13: That dyestuff is not a coloured and is not Scottish. fact14: That complainant is a flaskful if the fact that it is butyraceous or it is not providential or both does not hold. | fact1: (Ex): ¬({I}x & ¬{J}x) fact2: (x): (¬{E}x & {D}x) -> ¬{A}x fact3: (¬{A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) fact4: ¬{CM}{a} fact5: ¬{C}{a} -> (¬{C}{a} & ¬{AH}{a}) fact6: ¬{I}{d} -> ¬({G}{c} v ¬{H}{c}) fact7: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{A}{a} & ¬{IG}{a}) fact8: ¬{A}{a} fact9: {F}{c} -> {E}{b} fact10: ¬{B}{j} fact11: (x): {A}x -> (¬{B}x & ¬{CN}x) fact12: ¬{EO}{ba} -> (¬{EO}{ba} & ¬{BM}{ba}) fact13: (¬{CF}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) fact14: ¬({G}{c} v ¬{H}{c}) -> {F}{c} | [
"fact3 -> int1: That dyestuff does not aggress Astacura.;"
] | [
"fact3 -> int1: ¬{B}{a};"
] | This cybernaut does not aggress Astacura and it does not rail fashioned. | (¬{B}{co} & ¬{CN}{co}) | [
"fact15 -> int2: This cybernaut does not aggress Astacura and does not rail fashioned if this thing is Scottish.;"
] | 5 | 2 | null | 13 | 0 | 13 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: There exists something such that the fact that it is a beneficiary and non-neutering is false. fact2: Some man is not Scottish if that one does not spite Notoryctus and is a Omayyad. fact3: That dyestuff is not Scottish and this thing does not aggress Astacura. fact4: That dyestuff is not wiry. fact5: If that dyestuff is not a kind of an italic it is not an italic and it is not a parallelogram. fact6: The fact that either that complainant is not non-butyraceous or it is not providential or both does not hold if this forefather is not a kind of a beneficiary. fact7: That dyestuff is non-Scottish thing that does not relate Wynfrith if that dyestuff is non-Scottish. fact8: That dyestuff is not Scottish. fact9: If that complainant is a flaskful then this aegis spites Notoryctus. fact10: The hallucinogen does not aggress Astacura. fact11: Something does not aggress Astacura and it does not rail fashioned if it is Scottish. fact12: If that relations is not sacramental that relations is both not sacramental and not a Pseudechis. fact13: That dyestuff is not a coloured and is not Scottish. fact14: That complainant is a flaskful if the fact that it is butyraceous or it is not providential or both does not hold. ; $hypothesis$ = That dyestuff does not aggress Astacura and is not an italic. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That Israelites is not a Anseriformes. | ¬{A}{a} | fact1: If something is a levity then it is a blastoma. fact2: The fact that somebody is a mirthfulness but it does not comprise commonness does not hold if it is not amblyopic. fact3: If someone forecasts serenade then it is a Anseriformes. fact4: That Israelites does forecast serenade if that thing is a Maupassant and that thing is not chiliastic. fact5: Somebody is not a mirthfulness if the fact that this person is a mirthfulness and does not comprise commonness is false. fact6: If that Israelites is not a Maupassant but the person is chiliastic then that the person does forecast serenade is right. fact7: That Israelites is chiliastic if that Israelites is both annexal and not incomprehensive. fact8: That Israelites does not flounder and the one is not a abampere. fact9: The fact that that Israelites does not forecast serenade and it is not a kind of a Anseriformes if that prazosin is a mirthfulness is right. fact10: That Israelites is not areal and not a despisal. fact11: That Israelites does narrate Guadalcanal. fact12: That starship forecasts serenade. fact13: That Israelites is not a Maupassant and it is not chiliastic. | fact1: (x): {ER}x -> {AL}x fact2: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬({C}x & ¬{E}x) fact3: (x): {B}x -> {A}x fact4: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} fact5: (x): ¬({C}x & ¬{E}x) -> ¬{C}x fact6: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} fact7: ({EJ}{a} & ¬{EL}{a}) -> {AB}{a} fact8: (¬{N}{a} & ¬{FO}{a}) fact9: {C}{b} -> (¬{B}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) fact10: (¬{T}{a} & ¬{AN}{a}) fact11: {M}{a} fact12: {B}{bi} fact13: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) | [
"fact3 -> int1: That if that Israelites forecasts serenade then that Israelites is a kind of a Anseriformes hold.;"
] | [
"fact3 -> int1: {B}{a} -> {A}{a};"
] | That Israelites is not a Anseriformes. | ¬{A}{a} | [
"fact15 -> int2: That prazosin is not a mirthfulness if that she is a mirthfulness and she does not comprise commonness is false.; fact14 -> int3: If that that eraser is not amblyopic is true then that that eraser is a mirthfulness and does not comprise commonness is false.;"
] | 8 | 2 | null | 11 | 0 | 11 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If something is a levity then it is a blastoma. fact2: The fact that somebody is a mirthfulness but it does not comprise commonness does not hold if it is not amblyopic. fact3: If someone forecasts serenade then it is a Anseriformes. fact4: That Israelites does forecast serenade if that thing is a Maupassant and that thing is not chiliastic. fact5: Somebody is not a mirthfulness if the fact that this person is a mirthfulness and does not comprise commonness is false. fact6: If that Israelites is not a Maupassant but the person is chiliastic then that the person does forecast serenade is right. fact7: That Israelites is chiliastic if that Israelites is both annexal and not incomprehensive. fact8: That Israelites does not flounder and the one is not a abampere. fact9: The fact that that Israelites does not forecast serenade and it is not a kind of a Anseriformes if that prazosin is a mirthfulness is right. fact10: That Israelites is not areal and not a despisal. fact11: That Israelites does narrate Guadalcanal. fact12: That starship forecasts serenade. fact13: That Israelites is not a Maupassant and it is not chiliastic. ; $hypothesis$ = That Israelites is not a Anseriformes. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That that tracing happens and the tankage does not happens does not hold. | ¬({C} & ¬{D}) | fact1: If that that bleaching happens but that tracing does not occurs is incorrect that bleaching does not happens. fact2: That that bleaching does not happens triggers that that perineotomy occurs and this apostrophizing semicentennial happens. fact3: That the fact that notthe Majorness but that Hosting Waco occurs hold is not true if that Serbianness occurs. fact4: That contracting but notthe serialization happens if that geomorphologicness happens. fact5: That tracing but notthe tankage occurs if that tracing happens. fact6: The unhelpfulness happens. fact7: That geomorphologicness occurs if that that peeking does not happens and this rinse does not occurs is wrong. fact8: The tankage does not happens if the fact that either the tankage does not happens or that electoralness does not occurs or both is correct. fact9: The fact that that bleaching but notthat tracing occurs is false if the tankage does not occurs. fact10: Both that rafting and this non-doricness occurs. fact11: This apostrophizing semicentennial happens and that bleaching does not occurs. fact12: If the fact that this non-Majorness and that Hosting Waco occurs does not hold that electoralness does not happens. fact13: Both that Serbianness and this altercating compare happens if that dish does not happens. fact14: That tracing occurs if this apostrophizing semicentennial occurs. fact15: The fact that that that peeking does not occurs and this rinse does not occurs is right is wrong if this attributing grammar does not occurs. fact16: If the serialization does not happens notthat dish but this panting immovableness occurs. fact17: That surfing kor happens. fact18: That electoralness happens if that that Hosting Waco but notthe Majorness occurs is wrong. fact19: If this apostrophizing semicentennial does not happens that that tracing happens but the tankage does not happens does not hold. | fact1: ¬({B} & ¬{C}) -> ¬{B} fact2: ¬{B} -> ({JK} & {A}) fact3: {H} -> ¬(¬{F} & {G}) fact4: {N} -> ({M} & ¬{L}) fact5: {C} -> ({C} & ¬{D}) fact6: {GO} fact7: ¬(¬{O} & ¬{P}) -> {N} fact8: (¬{D} v ¬{E}) -> ¬{D} fact9: ¬{D} -> ¬({B} & ¬{C}) fact10: ({BE} & ¬{DL}) fact11: ({A} & ¬{B}) fact12: ¬(¬{F} & {G}) -> ¬{E} fact13: ¬{J} -> ({H} & {I}) fact14: {A} -> {C} fact15: ¬{Q} -> ¬(¬{O} & ¬{P}) fact16: ¬{L} -> (¬{J} & {K}) fact17: {EA} fact18: ¬({G} & ¬{F}) -> {E} fact19: ¬{A} -> ¬({C} & ¬{D}) | [
"fact11 -> int1: This apostrophizing semicentennial happens.; int1 & fact14 -> int2: That tracing occurs.; int2 & fact5 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact11 -> int1: {A}; int1 & fact14 -> int2: {C}; int2 & fact5 -> hypothesis;"
] | That perineotomy occurs. | {JK} | [] | 16 | 3 | 3 | 16 | 0 | 16 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If that that bleaching happens but that tracing does not occurs is incorrect that bleaching does not happens. fact2: That that bleaching does not happens triggers that that perineotomy occurs and this apostrophizing semicentennial happens. fact3: That the fact that notthe Majorness but that Hosting Waco occurs hold is not true if that Serbianness occurs. fact4: That contracting but notthe serialization happens if that geomorphologicness happens. fact5: That tracing but notthe tankage occurs if that tracing happens. fact6: The unhelpfulness happens. fact7: That geomorphologicness occurs if that that peeking does not happens and this rinse does not occurs is wrong. fact8: The tankage does not happens if the fact that either the tankage does not happens or that electoralness does not occurs or both is correct. fact9: The fact that that bleaching but notthat tracing occurs is false if the tankage does not occurs. fact10: Both that rafting and this non-doricness occurs. fact11: This apostrophizing semicentennial happens and that bleaching does not occurs. fact12: If the fact that this non-Majorness and that Hosting Waco occurs does not hold that electoralness does not happens. fact13: Both that Serbianness and this altercating compare happens if that dish does not happens. fact14: That tracing occurs if this apostrophizing semicentennial occurs. fact15: The fact that that that peeking does not occurs and this rinse does not occurs is right is wrong if this attributing grammar does not occurs. fact16: If the serialization does not happens notthat dish but this panting immovableness occurs. fact17: That surfing kor happens. fact18: That electoralness happens if that that Hosting Waco but notthe Majorness occurs is wrong. fact19: If this apostrophizing semicentennial does not happens that that tracing happens but the tankage does not happens does not hold. ; $hypothesis$ = That that tracing happens and the tankage does not happens does not hold. ; $proof$ = | fact11 -> int1: This apostrophizing semicentennial happens.; int1 & fact14 -> int2: That tracing occurs.; int2 & fact5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That everything is topped is false. | ¬((x): {A}x) | fact1: there is something such that if that this thing orders protanopia and this thing does not enroll creed is false this thing does not poach invoice. | fact1: fake_formula | [] | [] | null | null | [] | null | 1 | null | 0 | 0 | 0 | UNKNOWN | null | UNKNOWN | null | $facts$ = fact1: there is something such that if that this thing orders protanopia and this thing does not enroll creed is false this thing does not poach invoice. ; $hypothesis$ = That everything is topped is false. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | This forecastle reintroduces wanted. | {A}{a} | fact1: This haplosporidian is not excusable. fact2: If this soapstone does not lean Seriphus then either this soapstone is porous or it is erythropoietic or both. fact3: If that thermotropism leans Seriphus and it reprieves flakiness this plagiariser does not leans Seriphus. fact4: If somebody is erythropoietic then it is not a selfishness. fact5: If this haplosporidian stages then the fact that that funambulist is not a kind of a Polyborus and is not vacuolate does not hold. fact6: Something is not a selfishness if it is porous. fact7: Someone stages if the one either is not a Arp or stages or both. fact8: A quintet does not reintroduce wanted and is vertical. fact9: This forecastle is extensile. fact10: The comedian reintroduces wanted. fact11: If this haplosporidian is not excusable then it is not a Arp or stages or both. fact12: This forecastle is not a quintet if there exists something such that this is not a triskaidekaphobia and this is a Blephilia. fact13: This forecastle reintroduces wanted. fact14: This soapstone does not lean Seriphus if there exists something such that that does not lean Seriphus. fact15: If that something is both not a Polyborus and not vacuolate is incorrect then it is not filar. fact16: Guadalupe reintroduces wanted and is vertical if this forecastle is not a quintet. fact17: That thermotropism leans Seriphus and it reprieves flakiness if that funambulist is not filar. fact18: Some person is not a triskaidekaphobia but the one is a Blephilia if the one is not a selfishness. fact19: This manganite reintroduces wanted. fact20: that wanted reintroduces forecastle. | fact1: ¬{O}{f} fact2: ¬{I}{b} -> ({G}{b} v {H}{b}) fact3: ({I}{d} & {J}{d}) -> ¬{I}{c} fact4: (x): {H}x -> ¬{F}x fact5: {N}{f} -> ¬(¬{M}{e} & ¬{L}{e}) fact6: (x): {G}x -> ¬{F}x fact7: (x): (¬{P}x v {N}x) -> {N}x fact8: (x): {C}x -> (¬{A}x & {B}x) fact9: {FB}{a} fact10: {A}{u} fact11: ¬{O}{f} -> (¬{P}{f} v {N}{f}) fact12: (x): (¬{D}x & {E}x) -> ¬{C}{a} fact13: {A}{a} fact14: (x): ¬{I}x -> ¬{I}{b} fact15: (x): ¬(¬{M}x & ¬{L}x) -> ¬{K}x fact16: ¬{C}{a} -> ({A}{fn} & {B}{fn}) fact17: ¬{K}{e} -> ({I}{d} & {J}{d}) fact18: (x): ¬{F}x -> (¬{D}x & {E}x) fact19: {A}{dm} fact20: {AA}{aa} | [
"fact13 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact13 -> hypothesis;"
] | This forecastle does not reintroduce wanted. | ¬{A}{a} | [
"fact21 -> int1: This forecastle does not reintroduce wanted but it is vertical if it is a quintet.;"
] | 5 | 1 | 0 | 19 | 0 | 19 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: This haplosporidian is not excusable. fact2: If this soapstone does not lean Seriphus then either this soapstone is porous or it is erythropoietic or both. fact3: If that thermotropism leans Seriphus and it reprieves flakiness this plagiariser does not leans Seriphus. fact4: If somebody is erythropoietic then it is not a selfishness. fact5: If this haplosporidian stages then the fact that that funambulist is not a kind of a Polyborus and is not vacuolate does not hold. fact6: Something is not a selfishness if it is porous. fact7: Someone stages if the one either is not a Arp or stages or both. fact8: A quintet does not reintroduce wanted and is vertical. fact9: This forecastle is extensile. fact10: The comedian reintroduces wanted. fact11: If this haplosporidian is not excusable then it is not a Arp or stages or both. fact12: This forecastle is not a quintet if there exists something such that this is not a triskaidekaphobia and this is a Blephilia. fact13: This forecastle reintroduces wanted. fact14: This soapstone does not lean Seriphus if there exists something such that that does not lean Seriphus. fact15: If that something is both not a Polyborus and not vacuolate is incorrect then it is not filar. fact16: Guadalupe reintroduces wanted and is vertical if this forecastle is not a quintet. fact17: That thermotropism leans Seriphus and it reprieves flakiness if that funambulist is not filar. fact18: Some person is not a triskaidekaphobia but the one is a Blephilia if the one is not a selfishness. fact19: This manganite reintroduces wanted. fact20: that wanted reintroduces forecastle. ; $hypothesis$ = This forecastle reintroduces wanted. ; $proof$ = | fact13 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That that breech is both not a range and a Gastrophryne is false. | ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) | fact1: If that breech does not allure it is a Gastrophryne. fact2: Some man does not rollick boiled if the fact that she rollick boiled and she is not ammonitic does not hold. fact3: That breech is a kind of a Gastrophryne. fact4: That breech does not allure. fact5: The wetnurse does not allure. fact6: If that petticoat allures the fact that that breech is both not a range and a Gastrophryne is wrong. fact7: That that breech is not a range but a Gastrophryne if that breech does not allure is not incorrect. fact8: If something is ammonitic the fact that it allures hold. | fact1: ¬{A}{a} -> {AB}{a} fact2: (x): ¬({DC}x & ¬{B}x) -> ¬{DC}x fact3: {AB}{a} fact4: ¬{A}{a} fact5: ¬{A}{ac} fact6: {A}{b} -> ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact7: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact8: (x): {B}x -> {A}x | [
"fact7 & fact4 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact7 & fact4 -> hypothesis;"
] | That breech is a kind of non-microsomal thing that rollicks boiled. | (¬{AE}{a} & {DC}{a}) | [
"fact9 -> int1: If that that petticoat rollicks boiled and is not ammonitic is not correct then it does not rollicks boiled.;"
] | 5 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 6 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If that breech does not allure it is a Gastrophryne. fact2: Some man does not rollick boiled if the fact that she rollick boiled and she is not ammonitic does not hold. fact3: That breech is a kind of a Gastrophryne. fact4: That breech does not allure. fact5: The wetnurse does not allure. fact6: If that petticoat allures the fact that that breech is both not a range and a Gastrophryne is wrong. fact7: That that breech is not a range but a Gastrophryne if that breech does not allure is not incorrect. fact8: If something is ammonitic the fact that it allures hold. ; $hypothesis$ = That that breech is both not a range and a Gastrophryne is false. ; $proof$ = | fact7 & fact4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | This ninja is thermal. | ¬{AA}{aa} | fact1: If some person is not a kind of a Asteridae it does not camp GATT. fact2: If that cheek is thermal and a Asteridae this ninja is thermal. fact3: This ninja is both not a Asteridae and even. fact4: This ninja does not camp GATT. fact5: If this ninja is not a Asteridae then that one does not camp GATT. fact6: If some man is not a Asteridae then it is not nonthermal and it does not camp GATT. fact7: This ninja is even. | fact1: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬{AB}x fact2: (¬{AA}{a} & {A}{a}) -> {AA}{aa} fact3: (¬{A}{aa} & {B}{aa}) fact4: ¬{AB}{aa} fact5: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬{AB}{aa} fact6: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact7: {B}{aa} | [
"fact6 -> int1: This ninja is thermal thing that does not camp GATT if that thing is not a Asteridae.; fact3 -> int2: This ninja is not a Asteridae.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This ninja is non-nonthermal person that does not camp GATT.; int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact6 -> int1: ¬{A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}); fact3 -> int2: ¬{A}{aa}; int1 & int2 -> int3: (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}); int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | This ninja is nonthermal. | {AA}{aa} | [] | 4 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 5 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If some person is not a kind of a Asteridae it does not camp GATT. fact2: If that cheek is thermal and a Asteridae this ninja is thermal. fact3: This ninja is both not a Asteridae and even. fact4: This ninja does not camp GATT. fact5: If this ninja is not a Asteridae then that one does not camp GATT. fact6: If some man is not a Asteridae then it is not nonthermal and it does not camp GATT. fact7: This ninja is even. ; $hypothesis$ = This ninja is thermal. ; $proof$ = | fact6 -> int1: This ninja is thermal thing that does not camp GATT if that thing is not a Asteridae.; fact3 -> int2: This ninja is not a Asteridae.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This ninja is non-nonthermal person that does not camp GATT.; int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That that beeline does not confide Iliamna but it is asclepiadaceous does not hold. | ¬(¬{B}{d} & {C}{d}) | fact1: That that beeline confides Iliamna and it is asclepiadaceous does not hold. fact2: If the fact that that hull is not asclepiadaceous and it is not a toss is incorrect this deamination is asclepiadaceous. fact3: If this elater does not confide Iliamna then that the fact that that beeline does not confide Iliamna and is asclepiadaceous is wrong is right. fact4: This elater does not confide Iliamna if that that hull is alive and that is axonal does not hold. fact5: If that hull is non-longitudinal that that hull is not asclepiadaceous and it is not a toss is wrong. fact6: If something is not chiasmal then the fact that it is a standard that is not non-axonal does not hold. fact7: The fact that that hull is alive and is axonal is incorrect if this phrontistery is not chiasmal. fact8: That beeline does not confide Iliamna if the fact that this phrontistery is asclepiadaceous and this person is chiasmal does not hold. fact9: If this phrontistery confides Iliamna this deamination does confides Iliamna. fact10: If that that that hull is both longitudinal and non-Elizabethan is false is right that hull is not longitudinal. fact11: If that hull is not axonal then this elater does not confide Iliamna. fact12: If something that confides Iliamna is asclepiadaceous that is not chiasmal. fact13: That that raceway does manoeuvre loneliness and this one demeans does not hold. fact14: That if something does not replay psychokinesis that confides Iliamna and is underhanded is right. fact15: If either this phrontistery is not underhanded or it is chiasmal or both that beeline is chiasmal. fact16: If somebody is chiasmal then that person does not confide Iliamna and that person is asclepiadaceous. fact17: The fact that this phrontistery is not underhanded is correct if that that hull is a toss or that person is underhanded or both is not true. | fact1: ¬({B}{d} & {C}{d}) fact2: ¬(¬{C}{b} & ¬{F}{b}) -> {C}{hr} fact3: ¬{B}{c} -> ¬(¬{B}{d} & {C}{d}) fact4: ¬({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) -> ¬{B}{c} fact5: ¬{G}{b} -> ¬(¬{C}{b} & ¬{F}{b}) fact6: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({IS}x & {AB}x) fact7: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact8: ¬({C}{a} & {A}{a}) -> ¬{B}{d} fact9: {B}{a} -> {B}{hr} fact10: ¬({G}{b} & ¬{H}{b}) -> ¬{G}{b} fact11: ¬{AB}{b} -> ¬{B}{c} fact12: (x): ({B}x & {C}x) -> ¬{A}x fact13: ¬({IC}{dp} & {HI}{dp}) fact14: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({B}x & {D}x) fact15: (¬{D}{a} v {A}{a}) -> {A}{d} fact16: (x): {A}x -> (¬{B}x & {C}x) fact17: ¬({F}{b} v {D}{b}) -> ¬{D}{a} | [] | [] | The fact that this deamination is a standard that is axonal is incorrect. | ¬({IS}{hr} & {AB}{hr}) | [
"fact20 -> int1: If this deamination is not chiasmal then that it is a standard and it is axonal is incorrect.; fact21 -> int2: If this deamination does confide Iliamna and is asclepiadaceous then it is not chiasmal.; fact23 -> int3: If this phrontistery does not replay psychokinesis it confides Iliamna and it is underhanded.;"
] | 7 | 3 | null | 14 | 0 | 14 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That that beeline confides Iliamna and it is asclepiadaceous does not hold. fact2: If the fact that that hull is not asclepiadaceous and it is not a toss is incorrect this deamination is asclepiadaceous. fact3: If this elater does not confide Iliamna then that the fact that that beeline does not confide Iliamna and is asclepiadaceous is wrong is right. fact4: This elater does not confide Iliamna if that that hull is alive and that is axonal does not hold. fact5: If that hull is non-longitudinal that that hull is not asclepiadaceous and it is not a toss is wrong. fact6: If something is not chiasmal then the fact that it is a standard that is not non-axonal does not hold. fact7: The fact that that hull is alive and is axonal is incorrect if this phrontistery is not chiasmal. fact8: That beeline does not confide Iliamna if the fact that this phrontistery is asclepiadaceous and this person is chiasmal does not hold. fact9: If this phrontistery confides Iliamna this deamination does confides Iliamna. fact10: If that that that hull is both longitudinal and non-Elizabethan is false is right that hull is not longitudinal. fact11: If that hull is not axonal then this elater does not confide Iliamna. fact12: If something that confides Iliamna is asclepiadaceous that is not chiasmal. fact13: That that raceway does manoeuvre loneliness and this one demeans does not hold. fact14: That if something does not replay psychokinesis that confides Iliamna and is underhanded is right. fact15: If either this phrontistery is not underhanded or it is chiasmal or both that beeline is chiasmal. fact16: If somebody is chiasmal then that person does not confide Iliamna and that person is asclepiadaceous. fact17: The fact that this phrontistery is not underhanded is correct if that that hull is a toss or that person is underhanded or both is not true. ; $hypothesis$ = That that beeline does not confide Iliamna but it is asclepiadaceous does not hold. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | The fact that that this scintilla is beakless but that one is not hypovolemic is not true is true. | ¬({C}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) | fact1: This bigos is both a Cannes and hypovolemic. fact2: If this bigos is hypovolemic then this scintilla is beakless but the person is not hypovolemic. | fact1: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact2: {B}{a} -> ({C}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) | [
"fact1 -> int1: This bigos is hypovolemic.; int1 & fact2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact1 -> int1: {B}{a}; int1 & fact2 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: This bigos is both a Cannes and hypovolemic. fact2: If this bigos is hypovolemic then this scintilla is beakless but the person is not hypovolemic. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that this scintilla is beakless but that one is not hypovolemic is not true is true. ; $proof$ = | fact1 -> int1: This bigos is hypovolemic.; int1 & fact2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That Harrison owes Phthirus but it is non-pericardiac is incorrect. | ¬({A}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) | fact1: If that something does not owe Phthirus is right then the fact that this is a centered and this is not streptococcic is wrong. fact2: This undertaker is not non-urceolate if that this undertaker slams Leibniz but it is not streptococcic does not hold. fact3: If something is not unhappy it is both a diocesan and urceolate. fact4: Something is not unhappy if that it does not pith extrados and is unhappy does not hold. fact5: Some person is not tractable. fact6: If this undertaker is not non-urceolate then Harrison owes Phthirus and is not pericardiac. fact7: That if something is non-urceolate then the fact that it does owe Phthirus and is not pericardiac is false is correct. fact8: The fact that this undertaker owes Phthirus and this is urceolate is false. fact9: Harrison is not urceolate if this undertaker is a diocesan that is not urceolate. fact10: The fact that the fact that some person does not pith extrados and is unhappy is true is not true if it is a signed. | fact1: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({BH}x & ¬{AB}x) fact2: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} fact3: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({E}x & {B}x) fact4: (x): ¬(¬{F}x & {D}x) -> ¬{D}x fact5: (Ex): ¬{H}x fact6: {B}{a} -> ({A}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) fact7: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬({A}x & ¬{C}x) fact8: ¬({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact9: ({E}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact10: (x): {G}x -> ¬(¬{F}x & {D}x) | [] | [] | The fact that that hachure is a centered but it is not streptococcic is incorrect. | ¬({BH}{ej} & ¬{AB}{ej}) | [
"fact11 -> int1: That that hachure is a centered but it is not streptococcic does not hold if it does not owe Phthirus.;"
] | 5 | 2 | null | 8 | 0 | 8 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If that something does not owe Phthirus is right then the fact that this is a centered and this is not streptococcic is wrong. fact2: This undertaker is not non-urceolate if that this undertaker slams Leibniz but it is not streptococcic does not hold. fact3: If something is not unhappy it is both a diocesan and urceolate. fact4: Something is not unhappy if that it does not pith extrados and is unhappy does not hold. fact5: Some person is not tractable. fact6: If this undertaker is not non-urceolate then Harrison owes Phthirus and is not pericardiac. fact7: That if something is non-urceolate then the fact that it does owe Phthirus and is not pericardiac is false is correct. fact8: The fact that this undertaker owes Phthirus and this is urceolate is false. fact9: Harrison is not urceolate if this undertaker is a diocesan that is not urceolate. fact10: The fact that the fact that some person does not pith extrados and is unhappy is true is not true if it is a signed. ; $hypothesis$ = That Harrison owes Phthirus but it is non-pericardiac is incorrect. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | This cutout is not a deficiency. | ¬{B}{b} | fact1: This cutout does not boob kraurosis if that lapboard is not unreconcilable. fact2: The fact that either that lapboard overcharges NOAA or that one is angiomatous or both is correct if that one does not boob kraurosis. fact3: That lapboard is not a curled. fact4: That lapboard is a deficiency if this cutout is not non-angiomatous. fact5: If this cutout is not a kind of a deficiency this cutout overcharges NOAA and/or this person is angiomatous. fact6: If that lapboard is angiomatous then this cutout is a deficiency. fact7: That lapboard does not boob kraurosis. fact8: This cutout is impolitic. fact9: This loon does boob kraurosis. fact10: If that lapboard is a kind of a deficiency this cutout overcharges NOAA. fact11: This cutout is angiomatous. fact12: That lapboard is a deficiency if this cutout overcharges NOAA. fact13: This cutout is a deficiency if that lapboard does overcharge NOAA. fact14: that kraurosis does not boob lapboard. | fact1: ¬{C}{a} -> ¬{A}{b} fact2: ¬{A}{a} -> ({AA}{a} v {AB}{a}) fact3: ¬{AS}{a} fact4: {AB}{b} -> {B}{a} fact5: ¬{B}{b} -> ({AA}{b} v {AB}{b}) fact6: {AB}{a} -> {B}{b} fact7: ¬{A}{a} fact8: {EQ}{b} fact9: {A}{eo} fact10: {B}{a} -> {AA}{b} fact11: {AB}{b} fact12: {AA}{b} -> {B}{a} fact13: {AA}{a} -> {B}{b} fact14: ¬{AC}{aa} | [
"fact2 & fact7 -> int1: Either that lapboard overcharges NOAA or it is angiomatous or both.; int1 & fact13 & fact6 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact2 & fact7 -> int1: ({AA}{a} v {AB}{a}); int1 & fact13 & fact6 -> hypothesis;"
] | This cutout is not a deficiency. | ¬{B}{b} | [] | 5 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 10 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: This cutout does not boob kraurosis if that lapboard is not unreconcilable. fact2: The fact that either that lapboard overcharges NOAA or that one is angiomatous or both is correct if that one does not boob kraurosis. fact3: That lapboard is not a curled. fact4: That lapboard is a deficiency if this cutout is not non-angiomatous. fact5: If this cutout is not a kind of a deficiency this cutout overcharges NOAA and/or this person is angiomatous. fact6: If that lapboard is angiomatous then this cutout is a deficiency. fact7: That lapboard does not boob kraurosis. fact8: This cutout is impolitic. fact9: This loon does boob kraurosis. fact10: If that lapboard is a kind of a deficiency this cutout overcharges NOAA. fact11: This cutout is angiomatous. fact12: That lapboard is a deficiency if this cutout overcharges NOAA. fact13: This cutout is a deficiency if that lapboard does overcharge NOAA. fact14: that kraurosis does not boob lapboard. ; $hypothesis$ = This cutout is not a deficiency. ; $proof$ = | fact2 & fact7 -> int1: Either that lapboard overcharges NOAA or it is angiomatous or both.; int1 & fact13 & fact6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That leafage is a docility. | {D}{a} | fact1: That leafage occurs if the person is anaerobiotic person that does not foreshow Baldr. fact2: That leafage is a kind of anaerobiotic thing that does not foreshow Baldr. fact3: That leafage is non-downstair. fact4: If the fact that that leafage occurs and that person disfranchises pesewa is true then that person is not a docility. fact5: That leafage antiques. fact6: That leafage is a seventh. fact7: That leafage does disfranchise pesewa and is a clavus. fact8: This raper is not a clavus. fact9: If that joint is a kind of untraveled one that does not accost Rachycentron then that joint is a debt. fact10: That leafage is a kind of a clavus. fact11: That leafage does not foreshow Baldr. fact12: The colewort is not a clavus. | fact1: ({F}{a} & ¬{E}{a}) -> {C}{a} fact2: ({F}{a} & ¬{E}{a}) fact3: ¬{BB}{a} fact4: ({C}{a} & {A}{a}) -> ¬{D}{a} fact5: {BU}{a} fact6: {DM}{a} fact7: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact8: ¬{B}{gg} fact9: ({EE}{db} & ¬{GS}{db}) -> {GP}{db} fact10: {B}{a} fact11: ¬{E}{a} fact12: ¬{B}{da} | [
"fact7 -> int1: That leafage disfranchises pesewa.; fact2 & fact1 -> int2: That leafage occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That leafage occurs and it disfranchises pesewa.; int3 & fact4 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact7 -> int1: {A}{a}; fact2 & fact1 -> int2: {C}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ({C}{a} & {A}{a}); int3 & fact4 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 3 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 8 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: That leafage occurs if the person is anaerobiotic person that does not foreshow Baldr. fact2: That leafage is a kind of anaerobiotic thing that does not foreshow Baldr. fact3: That leafage is non-downstair. fact4: If the fact that that leafage occurs and that person disfranchises pesewa is true then that person is not a docility. fact5: That leafage antiques. fact6: That leafage is a seventh. fact7: That leafage does disfranchise pesewa and is a clavus. fact8: This raper is not a clavus. fact9: If that joint is a kind of untraveled one that does not accost Rachycentron then that joint is a debt. fact10: That leafage is a kind of a clavus. fact11: That leafage does not foreshow Baldr. fact12: The colewort is not a clavus. ; $hypothesis$ = That leafage is a docility. ; $proof$ = | fact7 -> int1: That leafage disfranchises pesewa.; fact2 & fact1 -> int2: That leafage occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That leafage occurs and it disfranchises pesewa.; int3 & fact4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That this orchis is a kind of a like and does not perspire Apennines does not hold. | ¬({E}{c} & ¬{C}{c}) | fact1: Something is a dieting that is not peritoneal if it does not perspire Apennines. fact2: Luciana is a dieting if this liberalist perspires Apennines and is not a like. fact3: Luciana is nominative if the fact that Luciana is a secondary hold. fact4: Something does not perspire Apennines but it is nuclear if it is anadromous. fact5: Someone is a like if that she/he is not a kind of a dieting and she/he is peritoneal is wrong. fact6: This liberalist is not peritoneal. fact7: Something is not fundamentalistic and it is not untreated if it is not androgenous. fact8: This liberalist is not anadromous but he/she is nuclear if Luciana is not shiny. fact9: This liberalist is a dieting. fact10: This liberalist is not androgenous if the fact that that precursor is both not an orderly and not androgenous is wrong. fact11: If this orchis criticises and is not easy Luciana is not shiny. fact12: If some man is not fundamentalistic that person is a like and/or that person does not perspire Apennines. fact13: This orchis does not criticise if the fact that either it is a kind of a Megadermatidae or it is not easy or both does not hold. fact14: The fact that this orchis is a Megadermatidae or it is not easy or both is incorrect if the fact that Luciana is unrenewed does not hold. fact15: If something does not criticise then that is anadromous and that is shiny. fact16: Luciana is a kind of a secondary if Luciana is not a screech. fact17: The fact that this orchis is a kind of a like and perspires Apennines does not hold. fact18: If something that is not anadromous is nuclear the thing is not fundamentalistic. fact19: If something is nominative then the thing is non-unrenewed thing that is nonalcoholic. fact20: This orchis is peritoneal if this liberalist is a dieting but it does not perspire Apennines. fact21: Luciana perspires Apennines if this liberalist is a dieting but that thing is not peritoneal. fact22: If this liberalist is not fundamentalistic that this orchis is not a dieting but he/she is peritoneal is wrong. fact23: That plyer is peritoneal. | fact1: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x & ¬{B}x) fact2: ({C}{a} & ¬{E}{a}) -> {A}{b} fact3: {Q}{b} -> {P}{b} fact4: (x): {G}x -> (¬{C}x & {F}x) fact5: (x): ¬(¬{A}x & {B}x) -> {E}x fact6: ¬{B}{a} fact7: (x): ¬{N}x -> (¬{D}x & ¬{L}x) fact8: ¬{H}{b} -> (¬{G}{a} & {F}{a}) fact9: {A}{a} fact10: ¬(¬{S}{d} & ¬{N}{d}) -> ¬{N}{a} fact11: ({I}{c} & ¬{J}{c}) -> ¬{H}{b} fact12: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({E}x v ¬{C}x) fact13: ¬({K}{c} v ¬{J}{c}) -> ¬{I}{c} fact14: ¬{M}{b} -> ¬({K}{c} v ¬{J}{c}) fact15: (x): ¬{I}x -> ({G}x & {H}x) fact16: ¬{R}{b} -> {Q}{b} fact17: ¬({E}{c} & {C}{c}) fact18: (x): (¬{G}x & {F}x) -> ¬{D}x fact19: (x): {P}x -> (¬{M}x & {O}x) fact20: ({A}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> {B}{c} fact21: ({A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> {C}{b} fact22: ¬{D}{a} -> ¬(¬{A}{c} & {B}{c}) fact23: {B}{gn} | [
"fact9 & fact6 -> int1: This liberalist is a dieting but this is non-peritoneal.; int1 & fact21 -> int2: Luciana perspires Apennines.;"
] | [
"fact9 & fact6 -> int1: ({A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}); int1 & fact21 -> int2: {C}{b};"
] | This attachment is not peritoneal. | ¬{B}{be} | [
"fact24 -> int3: This attachment is a dieting and not peritoneal if this attachment does not perspire Apennines.; fact27 -> int4: If this liberalist is not fundamentalistic then this liberalist is a like and/or does not perspire Apennines.; fact26 -> int5: If this liberalist is not anadromous but nuclear this liberalist is not fundamentalistic.;"
] | 7 | 3 | null | 20 | 0 | 20 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Something is a dieting that is not peritoneal if it does not perspire Apennines. fact2: Luciana is a dieting if this liberalist perspires Apennines and is not a like. fact3: Luciana is nominative if the fact that Luciana is a secondary hold. fact4: Something does not perspire Apennines but it is nuclear if it is anadromous. fact5: Someone is a like if that she/he is not a kind of a dieting and she/he is peritoneal is wrong. fact6: This liberalist is not peritoneal. fact7: Something is not fundamentalistic and it is not untreated if it is not androgenous. fact8: This liberalist is not anadromous but he/she is nuclear if Luciana is not shiny. fact9: This liberalist is a dieting. fact10: This liberalist is not androgenous if the fact that that precursor is both not an orderly and not androgenous is wrong. fact11: If this orchis criticises and is not easy Luciana is not shiny. fact12: If some man is not fundamentalistic that person is a like and/or that person does not perspire Apennines. fact13: This orchis does not criticise if the fact that either it is a kind of a Megadermatidae or it is not easy or both does not hold. fact14: The fact that this orchis is a Megadermatidae or it is not easy or both is incorrect if the fact that Luciana is unrenewed does not hold. fact15: If something does not criticise then that is anadromous and that is shiny. fact16: Luciana is a kind of a secondary if Luciana is not a screech. fact17: The fact that this orchis is a kind of a like and perspires Apennines does not hold. fact18: If something that is not anadromous is nuclear the thing is not fundamentalistic. fact19: If something is nominative then the thing is non-unrenewed thing that is nonalcoholic. fact20: This orchis is peritoneal if this liberalist is a dieting but it does not perspire Apennines. fact21: Luciana perspires Apennines if this liberalist is a dieting but that thing is not peritoneal. fact22: If this liberalist is not fundamentalistic that this orchis is not a dieting but he/she is peritoneal is wrong. fact23: That plyer is peritoneal. ; $hypothesis$ = That this orchis is a kind of a like and does not perspire Apennines does not hold. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That buffaloing Gerridae does not happens. | ¬{C} | fact1: If that sepaloidness occurs and this tergiversation happens then this vomiting Chlorophyceae does not occurs. fact2: This clean but notthat classicalness occurs if this athletics does not occurs. fact3: That buffaloing Gerridae is prevented by that this pencilling ERA occurs and that classicalness happens. fact4: That classicalness occurs. fact5: The fact that that buffaloing Gerridae does not occurs and this pencilling ERA does not occurs is incorrect if that classicalness does not happens. fact6: The taunt occurs. | fact1: ({CT} & {GT}) -> ¬{CM} fact2: ¬{E} -> ({D} & ¬{B}) fact3: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} fact4: {B} fact5: ¬{B} -> ¬(¬{C} & ¬{A}) fact6: {CQ} | [] | [] | That buffaloing Gerridae happens. | {C} | [] | 7 | 2 | null | 4 | 0 | 4 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If that sepaloidness occurs and this tergiversation happens then this vomiting Chlorophyceae does not occurs. fact2: This clean but notthat classicalness occurs if this athletics does not occurs. fact3: That buffaloing Gerridae is prevented by that this pencilling ERA occurs and that classicalness happens. fact4: That classicalness occurs. fact5: The fact that that buffaloing Gerridae does not occurs and this pencilling ERA does not occurs is incorrect if that classicalness does not happens. fact6: The taunt occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That buffaloing Gerridae does not happens. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That plum happens. | {B} | fact1: The Vesper occurs or this snitching Siphonaptera happens or both. fact2: If that capacitating cacodaemon occurs that altering Mashriq does not happens. fact3: If the fact that that that recording does not occurs but that hijab occurs is incorrect is right then this freeness does not occurs. fact4: If that altering Mashriq does not occurs that penileness happens and this artiodactylness occurs. fact5: If that egocentricness does not happens then that capacitating cacodaemon and that belittling Pluteaceae occurs. fact6: Either that citrousness or that palatialness or both happens. fact7: This impetus happens but that maturedness does not occurs if this artiodactylness occurs. fact8: If the fact that that superannuating respectfulness but notthe conspiring happens does not hold then this prostration occurs. fact9: That this rattling does not happens but that egocentricness occurs does not hold if this freeness does not happens. fact10: If this leafing reversibility does not occurs then the Katariness happens or this mulct occurs or both. fact11: That this prodigality happens prevents that this porcelainizing Begoniaceae happens. fact12: If both this porcelainizing Begoniaceae and that plum occurs then that this leafing reversibility does not occurs hold. fact13: That that recording does not happens but that hijab occurs is false if this prostration happens. fact14: That plum is prevented by that either that citrousness happens or that palatialness occurs or both. fact15: If that that palatialness but notthe communicating happens is incorrect then that citrousness does not happens. fact16: That egocentricness does not happens if the fact that the fact that this rattling does not happens and that egocentricness occurs is correct does not hold. fact17: The fact that that superannuating respectfulness but notthe conspiring occurs is incorrect if that peek does not happens. fact18: If that citrousness does not happens then that peek does not happens and/or this unencumberedness does not occurs. fact19: That that peek does not happens is triggered by that that peek does not occurs and/or this unencumberedness does not happens. fact20: This prodigality occurs if this impetus occurs. fact21: Both that plum and this leafing reversibility happens if that this porcelainizing Begoniaceae does not occurs is right. fact22: That plum does not occurs if that citrousness occurs. | fact1: ({BU} v {CL}) fact2: {J} -> ¬{I} fact3: ¬(¬{O} & {P}) -> ¬{M} fact4: ¬{I} -> ({H} & {G}) fact5: ¬{L} -> ({J} & {K}) fact6: ({AA} v {AB}) fact7: {G} -> ({E} & ¬{F}) fact8: ¬({S} & ¬{R}) -> {Q} fact9: ¬{M} -> ¬(¬{N} & {L}) fact10: ¬{A} -> ({FG} v {CT}) fact11: {D} -> ¬{C} fact12: ({C} & {B}) -> ¬{A} fact13: {Q} -> ¬(¬{O} & {P}) fact14: ({AA} v {AB}) -> ¬{B} fact15: ¬({AB} & ¬{AC}) -> ¬{AA} fact16: ¬(¬{N} & {L}) -> ¬{L} fact17: ¬{T} -> ¬({S} & ¬{R}) fact18: ¬{AA} -> (¬{T} v ¬{U}) fact19: (¬{T} v ¬{U}) -> ¬{T} fact20: {E} -> {D} fact21: ¬{C} -> ({B} & {A}) fact22: {AA} -> ¬{B} | [
"fact14 & fact6 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact14 & fact6 -> hypothesis;"
] | The Katariness or this mulct or both occurs. | ({FG} v {CT}) | [] | 5 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 0 | 20 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: The Vesper occurs or this snitching Siphonaptera happens or both. fact2: If that capacitating cacodaemon occurs that altering Mashriq does not happens. fact3: If the fact that that that recording does not occurs but that hijab occurs is incorrect is right then this freeness does not occurs. fact4: If that altering Mashriq does not occurs that penileness happens and this artiodactylness occurs. fact5: If that egocentricness does not happens then that capacitating cacodaemon and that belittling Pluteaceae occurs. fact6: Either that citrousness or that palatialness or both happens. fact7: This impetus happens but that maturedness does not occurs if this artiodactylness occurs. fact8: If the fact that that superannuating respectfulness but notthe conspiring happens does not hold then this prostration occurs. fact9: That this rattling does not happens but that egocentricness occurs does not hold if this freeness does not happens. fact10: If this leafing reversibility does not occurs then the Katariness happens or this mulct occurs or both. fact11: That this prodigality happens prevents that this porcelainizing Begoniaceae happens. fact12: If both this porcelainizing Begoniaceae and that plum occurs then that this leafing reversibility does not occurs hold. fact13: That that recording does not happens but that hijab occurs is false if this prostration happens. fact14: That plum is prevented by that either that citrousness happens or that palatialness occurs or both. fact15: If that that palatialness but notthe communicating happens is incorrect then that citrousness does not happens. fact16: That egocentricness does not happens if the fact that the fact that this rattling does not happens and that egocentricness occurs is correct does not hold. fact17: The fact that that superannuating respectfulness but notthe conspiring occurs is incorrect if that peek does not happens. fact18: If that citrousness does not happens then that peek does not happens and/or this unencumberedness does not occurs. fact19: That that peek does not happens is triggered by that that peek does not occurs and/or this unencumberedness does not happens. fact20: This prodigality occurs if this impetus occurs. fact21: Both that plum and this leafing reversibility happens if that this porcelainizing Begoniaceae does not occurs is right. fact22: That plum does not occurs if that citrousness occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That plum happens. ; $proof$ = | fact14 & fact6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | This empyrean is pneumococcal. | {B}{b} | fact1: Some person is a kind of a praenomen and the person is pneumococcal if the person does not cook. fact2: The fact that someone does not upraise companionableness and is a kind of a more is incorrect if it is insatiate. fact3: The superstructure is non-International. fact4: That aguacate is a praenomen and it is thoracic if this Zairese does not flummox Mossad. fact5: If that that consumption is a Lepadidae is right then this empyrean is pneumococcal. fact6: Either that consumption cooks or it is not pneumococcal or both if the celom is a kind of a praenomen. fact7: If that something is phrenological and it is a Selenarctos is incorrect that it is not a Selenarctos hold. fact8: This empyrean is pneumococcal if the fact that that consumption is not a Lepadidae but it is motorless does not hold. fact9: The fact that that consumption is not a Lepadidae but motorless is not right. fact10: That consumption is not thoracic. fact11: The fact that that consumption is a Lepadidae and motorless is false. fact12: This empyrean is not pneumococcal if that consumption cooks and/or that person is pneumococcal. fact13: If the superstructure is non-International then the fact that Will is not non-phrenological but a Selenarctos is incorrect. fact14: That inessential is not satiate but a peopled if Will is not a kind of a Selenarctos. fact15: If that aguacate is a kind of a praenomen then the celom is a kind of a praenomen. fact16: If something is a kind of a praenomen that it is a Lepadidae hold. | fact1: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x & {B}x) fact2: (x): {H}x -> ¬(¬{G}x & {F}x) fact3: ¬{K}{h} fact4: ¬{E}{e} -> ({A}{d} & {D}{d}) fact5: {AA}{a} -> {B}{b} fact6: {A}{c} -> ({C}{a} v ¬{B}{a}) fact7: (x): ¬({L}x & {J}x) -> ¬{J}x fact8: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} fact9: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact10: ¬{D}{a} fact11: ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact12: ({C}{a} v ¬{B}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact13: ¬{K}{h} -> ¬({L}{g} & {J}{g}) fact14: ¬{J}{g} -> ({H}{f} & {I}{f}) fact15: {A}{d} -> {A}{c} fact16: (x): {A}x -> {AA}x | [
"fact8 & fact9 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact8 & fact9 -> hypothesis;"
] | The fact that this acetamide is a Lepadidae is correct. | {AA}{ep} | [
"fact18 -> int1: If this acetamide is a praenomen then this acetamide is a Lepadidae.; fact19 -> int2: This acetamide is a praenomen and that is pneumococcal if that does not cook.; fact17 -> int3: There are non-thoracic things.;"
] | 6 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 0 | 14 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Some person is a kind of a praenomen and the person is pneumococcal if the person does not cook. fact2: The fact that someone does not upraise companionableness and is a kind of a more is incorrect if it is insatiate. fact3: The superstructure is non-International. fact4: That aguacate is a praenomen and it is thoracic if this Zairese does not flummox Mossad. fact5: If that that consumption is a Lepadidae is right then this empyrean is pneumococcal. fact6: Either that consumption cooks or it is not pneumococcal or both if the celom is a kind of a praenomen. fact7: If that something is phrenological and it is a Selenarctos is incorrect that it is not a Selenarctos hold. fact8: This empyrean is pneumococcal if the fact that that consumption is not a Lepadidae but it is motorless does not hold. fact9: The fact that that consumption is not a Lepadidae but motorless is not right. fact10: That consumption is not thoracic. fact11: The fact that that consumption is a Lepadidae and motorless is false. fact12: This empyrean is not pneumococcal if that consumption cooks and/or that person is pneumococcal. fact13: If the superstructure is non-International then the fact that Will is not non-phrenological but a Selenarctos is incorrect. fact14: That inessential is not satiate but a peopled if Will is not a kind of a Selenarctos. fact15: If that aguacate is a kind of a praenomen then the celom is a kind of a praenomen. fact16: If something is a kind of a praenomen that it is a Lepadidae hold. ; $hypothesis$ = This empyrean is pneumococcal. ; $proof$ = | fact8 & fact9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That both this sevens and this pic occurs is incorrect. | ¬({A} & {B}) | fact1: This pic occurs. fact2: That that hunting pretrial happens and this sevens happens is brought about by that this pic does not occurs. fact3: That that prying fortitude and this chimericness happens yields that this baseball does not occurs. fact4: If this baseball does not occurs the fact that both this sevens and this pic happens is incorrect. fact5: The unrhymedness happens and this tasting possessed occurs. | fact1: {B} fact2: ¬{B} -> ({L} & {A}) fact3: ({E} & {D}) -> ¬{C} fact4: ¬{C} -> ¬({A} & {B}) fact5: ({DD} & {H}) | [] | [] | That both this sevens and this pic occurs is incorrect. | ¬({A} & {B}) | [] | 5 | 1 | null | 4 | 0 | 4 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: This pic occurs. fact2: That that hunting pretrial happens and this sevens happens is brought about by that this pic does not occurs. fact3: That that prying fortitude and this chimericness happens yields that this baseball does not occurs. fact4: If this baseball does not occurs the fact that both this sevens and this pic happens is incorrect. fact5: The unrhymedness happens and this tasting possessed occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That both this sevens and this pic occurs is incorrect. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | The fact that everybody mesmerizes Usuli does not hold. | ¬((x): {A}x) | fact1: Some man that is harsh is not a Danish. fact2: Everyone is a kind of an acute. fact3: Everything is not inactive. fact4: Everyone fixes and it does not beshrew Brecht. fact5: Everybody is a quid. fact6: Everything is unprincipled. fact7: Everything is baroque. fact8: Everything is a duskiness. fact9: Something is a kind of a Urochordata that is not splintery if it does not beshrew Brecht. fact10: Something is harsh if that thing is a Urochordata and that thing is not splintery. fact11: Everything is a kind of an ache. fact12: Every man is dormant. fact13: Everything is brimless. fact14: Everybody is lowborn. fact15: Everything does Wake blanketed. fact16: Everybody is a Suisse. | fact1: (x): {C}x -> ¬{B}x fact2: (x): {EP}x fact3: (x): {DG}x fact4: (x): ({G}x & ¬{F}x) fact5: (x): {BP}x fact6: (x): {CF}x fact7: (x): {L}x fact8: (x): {AB}x fact9: (x): ¬{F}x -> ({D}x & ¬{E}x) fact10: (x): ({D}x & ¬{E}x) -> {C}x fact11: (x): {AT}x fact12: (x): {HU}x fact13: (x): {AD}x fact14: (x): {AA}x fact15: (x): {CI}x fact16: (x): {CE}x | [] | [] | Every man is a Naiadales. | (x): {JI}x | [
"fact17 -> int1: This C2H6 is not non-harsh if this C2H6 is a Urochordata but not splintery.; fact20 -> int2: This C2H6 does fix but the one does not beshrew Brecht.; int2 -> int3: This C2H6 does not beshrew Brecht.; fact19 -> int4: This C2H6 is a Urochordata but it is not splintery if this C2H6 does not beshrew Brecht.; int3 & int4 -> int5: This C2H6 is a Urochordata but it is not splintery.; int1 & int5 -> int6: This C2H6 is not non-harsh.; fact18 -> int7: If this C2H6 is harsh then this C2H6 is not a Danish.; int6 & int7 -> int8: This C2H6 is not a Danish.;"
] | 8 | 1 | null | 16 | 0 | 16 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Some man that is harsh is not a Danish. fact2: Everyone is a kind of an acute. fact3: Everything is not inactive. fact4: Everyone fixes and it does not beshrew Brecht. fact5: Everybody is a quid. fact6: Everything is unprincipled. fact7: Everything is baroque. fact8: Everything is a duskiness. fact9: Something is a kind of a Urochordata that is not splintery if it does not beshrew Brecht. fact10: Something is harsh if that thing is a Urochordata and that thing is not splintery. fact11: Everything is a kind of an ache. fact12: Every man is dormant. fact13: Everything is brimless. fact14: Everybody is lowborn. fact15: Everything does Wake blanketed. fact16: Everybody is a Suisse. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that everybody mesmerizes Usuli does not hold. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | The fact that this selflessness and this telling archidiaconate happens does not hold. | ¬({A} & {B}) | fact1: That seining Saponaria occurs and that unlovingness happens. fact2: That this does not occurs if the fact that this needlework and the do occurs is wrong is right. fact3: That either this undomesticness does not occurs or this assignment occurs or both is caused by that that contumacy does not happens. fact4: That this telling archidiaconate occurs is true. fact5: The fact that that bishopry and that exclusion happens is wrong if that this does not occurs hold. fact6: If this non-undomesticness and/or this assignment occurs then this undomesticness does not happens. fact7: That this pilotage does not occurs results in that the abbreviating mutualism occurs and this selflessness does not happens. fact8: If the fact that this pilotage does not happens is right that both this selflessness and this telling archidiaconate occurs is not true. fact9: That that peek happens and that contumacy does not occurs is triggered by that the prepositionalness does not occurs. fact10: If the fact that that bishopry occurs and that exclusion occurs is wrong then this pilotage does not happens. fact11: This selflessness occurs. fact12: This pilotage does not happens if the fact that both this non-undomesticness and that bishopry happens is wrong. | fact1: ({EA} & {GR}) fact2: ¬({J} & {H}) -> ¬{H} fact3: ¬{I} -> (¬{D} v {G}) fact4: {B} fact5: ¬{H} -> ¬({E} & {F}) fact6: (¬{D} v {G}) -> ¬{D} fact7: ¬{C} -> ({FO} & ¬{A}) fact8: ¬{C} -> ¬({A} & {B}) fact9: ¬{L} -> ({K} & ¬{I}) fact10: ¬({E} & {F}) -> ¬{C} fact11: {A} fact12: ¬(¬{D} & {E}) -> ¬{C} | [
"fact11 & fact4 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact11 & fact4 -> hypothesis;"
] | The fact that this selflessness and this telling archidiaconate happens does not hold. | ¬({A} & {B}) | [] | 7 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 10 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That seining Saponaria occurs and that unlovingness happens. fact2: That this does not occurs if the fact that this needlework and the do occurs is wrong is right. fact3: That either this undomesticness does not occurs or this assignment occurs or both is caused by that that contumacy does not happens. fact4: That this telling archidiaconate occurs is true. fact5: The fact that that bishopry and that exclusion happens is wrong if that this does not occurs hold. fact6: If this non-undomesticness and/or this assignment occurs then this undomesticness does not happens. fact7: That this pilotage does not occurs results in that the abbreviating mutualism occurs and this selflessness does not happens. fact8: If the fact that this pilotage does not happens is right that both this selflessness and this telling archidiaconate occurs is not true. fact9: That that peek happens and that contumacy does not occurs is triggered by that the prepositionalness does not occurs. fact10: If the fact that that bishopry occurs and that exclusion occurs is wrong then this pilotage does not happens. fact11: This selflessness occurs. fact12: This pilotage does not happens if the fact that both this non-undomesticness and that bishopry happens is wrong. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that this selflessness and this telling archidiaconate happens does not hold. ; $proof$ = | fact11 & fact4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | This apoptosis is not deistic. | ¬{A}{a} | fact1: If this photogravure is a randomness then that this photogravure is deistic but it is not a Heyward is incorrect. fact2: That this apoptosis is a kind of a Bartramia that is not a noticed is incorrect. fact3: The input is a baiza and non-connotative. fact4: If this apoptosis is deistic then the fact that that babu whimpers but this person is not a squashed is right. fact5: That that babu is a Corylopsis but it is not deistic is not right. fact6: If there exists something such that that thing is a Bartramia this palomino is a kind of a Bartramia but that thing is not a placard. fact7: The fact that something is not a Bartramia but unpalatable is incorrect if the thing is extrasensory. fact8: That babu is a kind of a Bartramia. fact9: If that babu is a Bartramia then the fact that that babu whimpers and is not a kind of a squashed does not hold. fact10: That babu whimpers. fact11: The fact that someone is not a Abkhaz and the one is palatable is incorrect if the one is a kind of a Necturus. fact12: Something is a Necturus if the thing is a transactinide. fact13: If that this apoptosis is a squashed is correct then that this apoptosis is deistic but the person is not a Bartramia is false. fact14: If the fact that that aloes is not a kind of a Abkhaz and the one is not unpalatable does not hold that babu is extrasensory. fact15: Something is deistic if that that is both a Corylopsis and not deistic is false. fact16: If this apoptosis is not non-deistic then that babu whimpers. fact17: That babu is not a doctorspeak. fact18: This apoptosis is a kind of a Bartramia if something is deistic and is extrasensory. fact19: This apoptosis is a Bartramia if that babu is extrasensory. fact20: If some man is a Bartramia it is deistic. fact21: This apoptosis is a squashed. fact22: If this apoptosis whimpers that babu is a Bartramia and is not deistic. | fact1: {JC}{ft} -> ¬({A}{ft} & ¬{JJ}{ft}) fact2: ¬({B}{a} & ¬{DP}{a}) fact3: ({EQ}{dt} & ¬{CN}{dt}) fact4: {A}{a} -> ({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact5: ¬({H}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) fact6: (x): {B}x -> ({B}{in} & ¬{AU}{in}) fact7: (x): {C}x -> ¬(¬{B}x & {D}x) fact8: {B}{b} fact9: {B}{b} -> ¬({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact10: {AA}{b} fact11: (x): {F}x -> ¬(¬{E}x & ¬{D}x) fact12: (x): {G}x -> {F}x fact13: {AB}{a} -> ¬({A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) fact14: ¬(¬{E}{c} & ¬{D}{c}) -> {C}{b} fact15: (x): ¬({H}x & ¬{A}x) -> {A}x fact16: {A}{a} -> {AA}{b} fact17: ¬{FB}{b} fact18: (x): ({A}x & {C}x) -> {B}{a} fact19: {C}{b} -> {B}{a} fact20: (x): {B}x -> {A}x fact21: {AB}{a} fact22: {AA}{a} -> ({B}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that that this apoptosis is not non-deistic is correct.; fact4 & assump1 -> int1: That babu whimpers but it is not a squashed.; fact9 & fact8 -> int2: The fact that that babu whimpers but he is not a kind of a squashed is not true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"void -> assump1: {A}{a}; fact4 & assump1 -> int1: ({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}); fact9 & fact8 -> int2: ¬({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}); int1 & int2 -> int3: #F#; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | Let's assume that that this apoptosis is not non-deistic is correct. | {A}{a} | [
"fact24 -> int4: If this apoptosis is a Bartramia this apoptosis is deistic.;"
] | 5 | 3 | 3 | 19 | 0 | 19 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If this photogravure is a randomness then that this photogravure is deistic but it is not a Heyward is incorrect. fact2: That this apoptosis is a kind of a Bartramia that is not a noticed is incorrect. fact3: The input is a baiza and non-connotative. fact4: If this apoptosis is deistic then the fact that that babu whimpers but this person is not a squashed is right. fact5: That that babu is a Corylopsis but it is not deistic is not right. fact6: If there exists something such that that thing is a Bartramia this palomino is a kind of a Bartramia but that thing is not a placard. fact7: The fact that something is not a Bartramia but unpalatable is incorrect if the thing is extrasensory. fact8: That babu is a kind of a Bartramia. fact9: If that babu is a Bartramia then the fact that that babu whimpers and is not a kind of a squashed does not hold. fact10: That babu whimpers. fact11: The fact that someone is not a Abkhaz and the one is palatable is incorrect if the one is a kind of a Necturus. fact12: Something is a Necturus if the thing is a transactinide. fact13: If that this apoptosis is a squashed is correct then that this apoptosis is deistic but the person is not a Bartramia is false. fact14: If the fact that that aloes is not a kind of a Abkhaz and the one is not unpalatable does not hold that babu is extrasensory. fact15: Something is deistic if that that is both a Corylopsis and not deistic is false. fact16: If this apoptosis is not non-deistic then that babu whimpers. fact17: That babu is not a doctorspeak. fact18: This apoptosis is a kind of a Bartramia if something is deistic and is extrasensory. fact19: This apoptosis is a Bartramia if that babu is extrasensory. fact20: If some man is a Bartramia it is deistic. fact21: This apoptosis is a squashed. fact22: If this apoptosis whimpers that babu is a Bartramia and is not deistic. ; $hypothesis$ = This apoptosis is not deistic. ; $proof$ = | void -> assump1: Let's assume that that this apoptosis is not non-deistic is correct.; fact4 & assump1 -> int1: That babu whimpers but it is not a squashed.; fact9 & fact8 -> int2: The fact that that babu whimpers but he is not a kind of a squashed is not true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | The fact that either this chronologicalness happens or that washup occurs or both is incorrect. | ¬({A} v {B}) | fact1: That this McCarthyism does not happens brings about that that hieing satori occurs and this noncommissionedness occurs. fact2: If the fact that that zapping Smalley does not occurs and that maternalism occurs is false then that washup happens. fact3: Both the institutionalizedness and this concussing reluctivity happens if that hieing satori occurs. fact4: That both this non-chronologicalness and the retiring dysarthria occurs is caused by that that washup does not happens. fact5: The fact that this noninstitutionalisedness does not occurs and that mitsvah does not happens is incorrect if the fact that this insubordination does not occurs hold. fact6: If the fact that that indication occurs or that surviving intangibleness does not happens or both is incorrect then this McCarthyism does not happens. fact7: That that zapping Smalley does not happens but that maternalism occurs is false. fact8: That this chronologicalness occurs or that washup occurs or both is incorrect if this repeal does not happens. fact9: If either that mitsvah happens or this repeal does not happens or both that washup does not occurs. fact10: That this twanging does not occurs is caused by that the decimalization happens and this centesis happens. fact11: The fact that that mitsvah and this insubordination occurs does not hold if this noninstitutionalisedness does not occurs. fact12: The fact that that hieing satori happens and this concussing reluctivity happens is incorrect if this noncommissionedness does not happens. fact13: This insubordination does not happens if that that that hieing satori occurs and this concussing reluctivity occurs is wrong is true. fact14: If this twanging does not happens the fact that that indication occurs and/or that surviving intangibleness does not occurs is incorrect. fact15: If that this noninstitutionalisedness does not occurs and that mitsvah does not happens is wrong then that mitsvah happens. | fact1: ¬{J} -> ({H} & {I}) fact2: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) -> {B} fact3: {H} -> (¬{F} & {G}) fact4: ¬{B} -> (¬{A} & {FB}) fact5: ¬{E} -> ¬(¬{F} & ¬{D}) fact6: ¬({K} v ¬{L}) -> ¬{J} fact7: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) fact8: ¬{C} -> ¬({A} v {B}) fact9: ({D} v ¬{C}) -> ¬{B} fact10: ({O} & {N}) -> ¬{M} fact11: ¬{F} -> ¬({D} & {E}) fact12: ¬{I} -> ¬({H} & {G}) fact13: ¬({H} & {G}) -> ¬{E} fact14: ¬{M} -> ¬({K} v ¬{L}) fact15: ¬(¬{F} & ¬{D}) -> {D} | [
"fact2 & fact7 -> int1: That washup occurs.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact2 & fact7 -> int1: {B}; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | The fact that either this chronologicalness happens or that washup occurs or both is incorrect. | ¬({A} v {B}) | [] | 12 | 2 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 13 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That this McCarthyism does not happens brings about that that hieing satori occurs and this noncommissionedness occurs. fact2: If the fact that that zapping Smalley does not occurs and that maternalism occurs is false then that washup happens. fact3: Both the institutionalizedness and this concussing reluctivity happens if that hieing satori occurs. fact4: That both this non-chronologicalness and the retiring dysarthria occurs is caused by that that washup does not happens. fact5: The fact that this noninstitutionalisedness does not occurs and that mitsvah does not happens is incorrect if the fact that this insubordination does not occurs hold. fact6: If the fact that that indication occurs or that surviving intangibleness does not happens or both is incorrect then this McCarthyism does not happens. fact7: That that zapping Smalley does not happens but that maternalism occurs is false. fact8: That this chronologicalness occurs or that washup occurs or both is incorrect if this repeal does not happens. fact9: If either that mitsvah happens or this repeal does not happens or both that washup does not occurs. fact10: That this twanging does not occurs is caused by that the decimalization happens and this centesis happens. fact11: The fact that that mitsvah and this insubordination occurs does not hold if this noninstitutionalisedness does not occurs. fact12: The fact that that hieing satori happens and this concussing reluctivity happens is incorrect if this noncommissionedness does not happens. fact13: This insubordination does not happens if that that that hieing satori occurs and this concussing reluctivity occurs is wrong is true. fact14: If this twanging does not happens the fact that that indication occurs and/or that surviving intangibleness does not occurs is incorrect. fact15: If that this noninstitutionalisedness does not occurs and that mitsvah does not happens is wrong then that mitsvah happens. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that either this chronologicalness happens or that washup occurs or both is incorrect. ; $proof$ = | fact2 & fact7 -> int1: That washup occurs.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | There is something such that if the fact that it is not a holonym and it does not sequester is incorrect then it does shake Secale. | (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x | fact1: That there exists something such that if that it is non-Episcopalian thing that is not Kyrgyzstani is incorrect it skittleses eared hold. fact2: If that Charlene is not a holonym and does not sequester does not hold the fact that that thing shakes Secale is true. fact3: If that mestranol poaches lawlessness then that one reinvigorateds deliciousness. fact4: If the fact that that Charlene is a holonym but he/she does not sequester is false hold he/she shakes Secale. fact5: The fact that if Charlene is not a holonym and does not sequester then Charlene shakes Secale is true. | fact1: (Ex): ¬(¬{AJ}x & ¬{AD}x) -> {GO}x fact2: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} fact3: {FB}{bn} -> {AL}{bn} fact4: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} fact5: (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} | [
"fact2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact2 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: That there exists something such that if that it is non-Episcopalian thing that is not Kyrgyzstani is incorrect it skittleses eared hold. fact2: If that Charlene is not a holonym and does not sequester does not hold the fact that that thing shakes Secale is true. fact3: If that mestranol poaches lawlessness then that one reinvigorateds deliciousness. fact4: If the fact that that Charlene is a holonym but he/she does not sequester is false hold he/she shakes Secale. fact5: The fact that if Charlene is not a holonym and does not sequester then Charlene shakes Secale is true. ; $hypothesis$ = There is something such that if the fact that it is not a holonym and it does not sequester is incorrect then it does shake Secale. ; $proof$ = | fact2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | Let's assume that Jodie is anoestrous. | {A}{a} | fact1: That Jodie is not a kind of a Chamaecyparis but she/he is anoestrous does not hold. fact2: If Jodie is anoestrous the fact that this neighbor does not steam aspergillosis and is a kind of a Chamaecyparis is false. fact3: That that woodscrew engages is right. fact4: This neighbor is not anoestrous if that woodscrew is anoestrous and/or engages. fact5: If that that middle is not a Epictetus but that is ungrammatical does not hold then that is ungrammatical. fact6: That woodscrew is anoestrous and it is a Microchiroptera if that middle is not ungrammatical. fact7: If the fact that this neighbor is not a Atropidae hold then Jodie is non-anoestrous but it engages. fact8: If that woodscrew does engage this neighbor does not steam aspergillosis and is a Chamaecyparis. fact9: Jodie is anoestrous if this neighbor is a kind of anoestrous thing that is not a Atropidae. fact10: If Jodie is anoestrous then the fact that the fact that this neighbor does steam aspergillosis and that thing is a kind of a Chamaecyparis is wrong is correct. | fact1: ¬(¬{AB}{a} & {A}{a}) fact2: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact3: {B}{c} fact4: ({A}{c} v {B}{c}) -> ¬{A}{b} fact5: ¬(¬{G}{d} & {E}{d}) -> ¬{E}{d} fact6: ¬{E}{d} -> ({A}{c} & {D}{c}) fact7: ¬{C}{b} -> (¬{A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact8: {B}{c} -> (¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact9: (¬{A}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) -> {A}{a} fact10: {A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that Jodie is anoestrous.; fact2 & assump1 -> int1: The fact that this neighbor does not steam aspergillosis and is a Chamaecyparis is incorrect.; fact8 & fact3 -> int2: This neighbor does not steam aspergillosis and is a Chamaecyparis.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"void -> assump1: {A}{a}; fact2 & assump1 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}); fact8 & fact3 -> int2: (¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}); int1 & int2 -> int3: #F#; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | Jodie engages. | {B}{a} | [] | 6 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 7 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That Jodie is not a kind of a Chamaecyparis but she/he is anoestrous does not hold. fact2: If Jodie is anoestrous the fact that this neighbor does not steam aspergillosis and is a kind of a Chamaecyparis is false. fact3: That that woodscrew engages is right. fact4: This neighbor is not anoestrous if that woodscrew is anoestrous and/or engages. fact5: If that that middle is not a Epictetus but that is ungrammatical does not hold then that is ungrammatical. fact6: That woodscrew is anoestrous and it is a Microchiroptera if that middle is not ungrammatical. fact7: If the fact that this neighbor is not a Atropidae hold then Jodie is non-anoestrous but it engages. fact8: If that woodscrew does engage this neighbor does not steam aspergillosis and is a Chamaecyparis. fact9: Jodie is anoestrous if this neighbor is a kind of anoestrous thing that is not a Atropidae. fact10: If Jodie is anoestrous then the fact that the fact that this neighbor does steam aspergillosis and that thing is a kind of a Chamaecyparis is wrong is correct. ; $hypothesis$ = Let's assume that Jodie is anoestrous. ; $proof$ = | void -> assump1: Let's assume that Jodie is anoestrous.; fact2 & assump1 -> int1: The fact that this neighbor does not steam aspergillosis and is a Chamaecyparis is incorrect.; fact8 & fact3 -> int2: This neighbor does not steam aspergillosis and is a Chamaecyparis.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | This broadcasting does not happens. | ¬{D} | fact1: That climax does not occurs if the fact that that knifing and the racism happens is true. fact2: The shallowness occurs. fact3: This fixing does not happens if the rumour and the Belarusianness occurs. fact4: That pantheistness and this rustication happens. fact5: This rheologicness happens. fact6: If this rustication does not happens both that pantheistness and this broadcasting happens. fact7: That pyroelectricity happens. fact8: This broadcasting does not happens if both this rustication and this attainder occurs. | fact1: ({IJ} & {HE}) -> ¬{JA} fact2: {BR} fact3: ({L} & {GR}) -> ¬{EG} fact4: ({A} & {B}) fact5: {HK} fact6: ¬{B} -> ({A} & {D}) fact7: {IT} fact8: ({B} & {C}) -> ¬{D} | [
"fact4 -> int1: This rustication occurs.;"
] | [
"fact4 -> int1: {B};"
] | This broadcasting happens. | {D} | [] | 6 | 3 | null | 6 | 0 | 6 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That climax does not occurs if the fact that that knifing and the racism happens is true. fact2: The shallowness occurs. fact3: This fixing does not happens if the rumour and the Belarusianness occurs. fact4: That pantheistness and this rustication happens. fact5: This rheologicness happens. fact6: If this rustication does not happens both that pantheistness and this broadcasting happens. fact7: That pyroelectricity happens. fact8: This broadcasting does not happens if both this rustication and this attainder occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = This broadcasting does not happens. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That that distension does not occurs hold. | ¬{B} | fact1: The charades does not happens. fact2: If the fact that this countessing Pontos occurs but that attempt does not occurs is not correct this countessing Pontos does not occurs. fact3: That this hajj does not occurs is prevented by that that rolling revisionism occurs. fact4: That accelerating etymology brings about that that playacting Ascaris does not happens and/or the presocraticness does not happens. fact5: That drying does not occurs if that parochialness occurs. fact6: That flanking Philohela does not happens. fact7: If that woodiness happens then this adorning does not happens and/or that cornered does not happens. fact8: That distension does not occurs if that flanking Philohela does not occurs. fact9: That that distension and that flanking Philohela occurs is caused by that that decaffeinating Lofoten does not happens. fact10: That that remunerating does not happens triggers that both that woodiness and this internationalization occurs. fact11: That that drying does not occurs causes that that decaffeinating Lofoten and that distension occurs. fact12: That that this countessing Pontos happens and that attempt does not occurs is false hold if this hajj happens. fact13: That accelerating etymology occurs. fact14: That this countessing Pontos does not happens brings about that that patellarness and that parochialness occurs. fact15: That that playacting Ascaris does not happens and/or that the presocraticness does not occurs results in that that remunerating does not happens. | fact1: ¬{GT} fact2: ¬({G} & ¬{I}) -> ¬{G} fact3: {J} -> {H} fact4: {R} -> (¬{P} v ¬{Q}) fact5: {E} -> ¬{D} fact6: ¬{A} fact7: {M} -> (¬{L} v ¬{K}) fact8: ¬{A} -> ¬{B} fact9: ¬{C} -> ({B} & {A}) fact10: ¬{O} -> ({M} & {N}) fact11: ¬{D} -> ({C} & {B}) fact12: {H} -> ¬({G} & ¬{I}) fact13: {R} fact14: ¬{G} -> ({F} & {E}) fact15: (¬{P} v ¬{Q}) -> ¬{O} | [
"fact8 & fact6 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact8 & fact6 -> hypothesis;"
] | That distension occurs. | {B} | [] | 6 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 13 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: The charades does not happens. fact2: If the fact that this countessing Pontos occurs but that attempt does not occurs is not correct this countessing Pontos does not occurs. fact3: That this hajj does not occurs is prevented by that that rolling revisionism occurs. fact4: That accelerating etymology brings about that that playacting Ascaris does not happens and/or the presocraticness does not happens. fact5: That drying does not occurs if that parochialness occurs. fact6: That flanking Philohela does not happens. fact7: If that woodiness happens then this adorning does not happens and/or that cornered does not happens. fact8: That distension does not occurs if that flanking Philohela does not occurs. fact9: That that distension and that flanking Philohela occurs is caused by that that decaffeinating Lofoten does not happens. fact10: That that remunerating does not happens triggers that both that woodiness and this internationalization occurs. fact11: That that drying does not occurs causes that that decaffeinating Lofoten and that distension occurs. fact12: That that this countessing Pontos happens and that attempt does not occurs is false hold if this hajj happens. fact13: That accelerating etymology occurs. fact14: That this countessing Pontos does not happens brings about that that patellarness and that parochialness occurs. fact15: That that playacting Ascaris does not happens and/or that the presocraticness does not occurs results in that that remunerating does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That that distension does not occurs hold. ; $proof$ = | fact8 & fact6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | There exists something such that if that is not a kind of a Thelypteridaceae then that is a kind of non-tamer thing that is not non-exergonic. | (Ex): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) | fact1: Something is not a kind of a Genoa but it is a Eustoma if it is not a Caucasian. fact2: There is some man such that if it is not a Thelypteridaceae then it is tamer and it is exergonic. fact3: Some person does not avalanche CLI but the one is a Millikan if the one is not a trifling. fact4: There is something such that if it is a Thelypteridaceae then it is not tamer and is exergonic. fact5: Something is not tamer and not non-exergonic if it is a Thelypteridaceae. fact6: That acetanilid is exergonic if she/he is not a Thelypteridaceae. fact7: There is some person such that if she is not unendowed she is non-hemorrhagic person that shatters Aepyceros. fact8: That acetanilid is a kind of non-tamer thing that is not non-exergonic if that acetanilid is a Thelypteridaceae. fact9: Something is both not tamer and exergonic if this is not a Thelypteridaceae. fact10: Some man does not mesmerize and is a Marsilea if it is not a kind of a courting. fact11: If that acetanilid is not a Thelypteridaceae that acetanilid is tamer and the one is exergonic. fact12: There is something such that if that is not a kind of a Thelypteridaceae that is exergonic. fact13: There is something such that if that thing is not a Thelypteridaceae that thing is not tamer. | fact1: (x): ¬{HF}x -> (¬{IB}x & {C}x) fact2: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> ({AA}x & {AB}x) fact3: (x): ¬{CC}x -> (¬{H}x & {DJ}x) fact4: (Ex): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) fact5: (x): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) fact6: ¬{A}{aa} -> {AB}{aa} fact7: (Ex): ¬{BP}x -> (¬{F}x & {BA}x) fact8: {A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) fact9: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) fact10: (x): ¬{J}x -> (¬{FP}x & {BB}x) fact11: ¬{A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) fact12: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> {AB}x fact13: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> ¬{AA}x | [
"fact9 -> int1: If that acetanilid is not a Thelypteridaceae then it is a kind of non-tamer one that is exergonic.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact9 -> int1: ¬{A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}); int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | There is some man such that if this one is not a trifling this one does not avalanche CLI and is a Millikan. | (Ex): ¬{CC}x -> (¬{H}x & {DJ}x) | [
"fact14 -> int2: The fact that that maharaja does not avalanche CLI and is a Millikan is true if the fact that that maharaja is not a trifling hold.; int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 12 | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | $facts$ = fact1: Something is not a kind of a Genoa but it is a Eustoma if it is not a Caucasian. fact2: There is some man such that if it is not a Thelypteridaceae then it is tamer and it is exergonic. fact3: Some person does not avalanche CLI but the one is a Millikan if the one is not a trifling. fact4: There is something such that if it is a Thelypteridaceae then it is not tamer and is exergonic. fact5: Something is not tamer and not non-exergonic if it is a Thelypteridaceae. fact6: That acetanilid is exergonic if she/he is not a Thelypteridaceae. fact7: There is some person such that if she is not unendowed she is non-hemorrhagic person that shatters Aepyceros. fact8: That acetanilid is a kind of non-tamer thing that is not non-exergonic if that acetanilid is a Thelypteridaceae. fact9: Something is both not tamer and exergonic if this is not a Thelypteridaceae. fact10: Some man does not mesmerize and is a Marsilea if it is not a kind of a courting. fact11: If that acetanilid is not a Thelypteridaceae that acetanilid is tamer and the one is exergonic. fact12: There is something such that if that is not a kind of a Thelypteridaceae that is exergonic. fact13: There is something such that if that thing is not a Thelypteridaceae that thing is not tamer. ; $hypothesis$ = There exists something such that if that is not a kind of a Thelypteridaceae then that is a kind of non-tamer thing that is not non-exergonic. ; $proof$ = | fact9 -> int1: If that acetanilid is not a Thelypteridaceae then it is a kind of non-tamer one that is exergonic.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | Let's assume that this lather does not nut Tilletiaceae. | ¬{A}{a} | fact1: Something that does not frisk Yalta is a debauch. fact2: Every man is a kind of a Calvinism and/or nuts Tilletiaceae. fact3: That that Ru does not mist dyscalculia or this one is a kind of a Calvinism or both is wrong if this lather does not nut Tilletiaceae. fact4: This lather does not nut Tilletiaceae and is not a fortnight if that Ru implores flair. fact5: That that Ru is not a Calvinism hold. fact6: If that chevalier is a debauch the pikeblenny is a kind of a debauch. fact7: If the pikeblenny is a debauch then this ebbing is a debauch. fact8: The fact that this lather is not a Calvinism or it mists dyscalculia or both is false if that Ru does not nut Tilletiaceae. fact9: That everything is beaked and/or a Heimdallr is true. fact10: That everything does not mist dyscalculia and/or this is a Calvinism is correct. fact11: That Ru is not a Calvinism if this lather does not nut Tilletiaceae. fact12: That cervix mists dyscalculia. fact13: Something that is a debauch is both residual and not a Rousseau. fact14: If Selvin is residual that Ru implores flair. fact15: Everyone nuts Tilletiaceae and/or the person is a Calvinism. fact16: Selvin is residual if this ebbing is residual but this is not a Rousseau. | fact1: (x): ¬{G}x -> {E}x fact2: (x): ({AB}x v {A}x) fact3: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} v {AB}{b}) fact4: {C}{b} -> (¬{A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) fact5: ¬{AB}{b} fact6: {E}{f} -> {E}{e} fact7: {E}{e} -> {E}{d} fact8: ¬{A}{b} -> ¬(¬{AB}{a} v {AA}{a}) fact9: (x): ({N}x v {AO}x) fact10: (x): (¬{AA}x v {AB}x) fact11: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{AB}{b} fact12: {AA}{an} fact13: (x): {E}x -> ({D}x & ¬{F}x) fact14: {D}{c} -> {C}{b} fact15: (x): ({A}x v {AB}x) fact16: ({D}{d} & ¬{F}{d}) -> {D}{c} | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that this lather does not nut Tilletiaceae.; fact3 & assump1 -> int1: That either that Ru does not mist dyscalculia or it is a Calvinism or both is not right.; fact10 -> int2: Either that Ru does not mist dyscalculia or that person is a Calvinism or both.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"void -> assump1: ¬{A}{a}; fact3 & assump1 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{b} v {AB}{b}); fact10 -> int2: (¬{AA}{b} v {AB}{b}); int1 & int2 -> int3: #F#; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | Let's assume that this lather does not nut Tilletiaceae. | ¬{A}{a} | [
"fact19 -> int4: That this ebbing is residual but it is not a Rousseau if this ebbing is a debauch is correct.; fact21 -> int5: That chevalier is a debauch if the thing does not frisk Yalta.;"
] | 10 | 3 | 3 | 14 | 0 | 14 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Something that does not frisk Yalta is a debauch. fact2: Every man is a kind of a Calvinism and/or nuts Tilletiaceae. fact3: That that Ru does not mist dyscalculia or this one is a kind of a Calvinism or both is wrong if this lather does not nut Tilletiaceae. fact4: This lather does not nut Tilletiaceae and is not a fortnight if that Ru implores flair. fact5: That that Ru is not a Calvinism hold. fact6: If that chevalier is a debauch the pikeblenny is a kind of a debauch. fact7: If the pikeblenny is a debauch then this ebbing is a debauch. fact8: The fact that this lather is not a Calvinism or it mists dyscalculia or both is false if that Ru does not nut Tilletiaceae. fact9: That everything is beaked and/or a Heimdallr is true. fact10: That everything does not mist dyscalculia and/or this is a Calvinism is correct. fact11: That Ru is not a Calvinism if this lather does not nut Tilletiaceae. fact12: That cervix mists dyscalculia. fact13: Something that is a debauch is both residual and not a Rousseau. fact14: If Selvin is residual that Ru implores flair. fact15: Everyone nuts Tilletiaceae and/or the person is a Calvinism. fact16: Selvin is residual if this ebbing is residual but this is not a Rousseau. ; $hypothesis$ = Let's assume that this lather does not nut Tilletiaceae. ; $proof$ = | void -> assump1: Let's assume that this lather does not nut Tilletiaceae.; fact3 & assump1 -> int1: That either that Ru does not mist dyscalculia or it is a Calvinism or both is not right.; fact10 -> int2: Either that Ru does not mist dyscalculia or that person is a Calvinism or both.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That chafing pneumoconiosis happens if that impoliticness occurs. | {A} -> {B} | fact1: The rip occurs if this pyroligneousness does not occurs and this ingraining does not occurs. fact2: The legateship does not occurs and the trumping does not happens if the doricness happens. fact3: The prostateness occurs. fact4: The arguing Alismataceae occurs. fact5: That this bolometricness occurs but that contracture does not happens brings about that that chafing pneumoconiosis occurs. fact6: That chafing pneumoconiosis occurs if this non-bolometricness and that contracture occurs. fact7: That inaccessibleness occurs. fact8: If this bolometricness does not happens and that contracture does not happens then that chafing pneumoconiosis occurs. fact9: That that impoliticness occurs results in that this bolometricness does not happens and that contracture does not happens. fact10: This sleeping stature occurs. fact11: That this beclouding happens prevents this non-isthmianness. | fact1: (¬{EE} & ¬{HN}) -> {HK} fact2: {EO} -> (¬{FK} & ¬{AO}) fact3: {EA} fact4: {IK} fact5: ({AA} & ¬{AB}) -> {B} fact6: (¬{AA} & {AB}) -> {B} fact7: {D} fact8: (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) -> {B} fact9: {A} -> (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) fact10: {JH} fact11: {CH} -> {HM} | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that that impoliticness occurs.; fact9 & assump1 -> int1: This bolometricness does not occurs and that contracture does not occurs.; int1 & fact8 -> int2: That chafing pneumoconiosis occurs.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"void -> assump1: {A}; fact9 & assump1 -> int1: (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}); int1 & fact8 -> int2: {B}; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 3 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 9 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: The rip occurs if this pyroligneousness does not occurs and this ingraining does not occurs. fact2: The legateship does not occurs and the trumping does not happens if the doricness happens. fact3: The prostateness occurs. fact4: The arguing Alismataceae occurs. fact5: That this bolometricness occurs but that contracture does not happens brings about that that chafing pneumoconiosis occurs. fact6: That chafing pneumoconiosis occurs if this non-bolometricness and that contracture occurs. fact7: That inaccessibleness occurs. fact8: If this bolometricness does not happens and that contracture does not happens then that chafing pneumoconiosis occurs. fact9: That that impoliticness occurs results in that this bolometricness does not happens and that contracture does not happens. fact10: This sleeping stature occurs. fact11: That this beclouding happens prevents this non-isthmianness. ; $hypothesis$ = That chafing pneumoconiosis happens if that impoliticness occurs. ; $proof$ = | void -> assump1: Let's assume that that impoliticness occurs.; fact9 & assump1 -> int1: This bolometricness does not occurs and that contracture does not occurs.; int1 & fact8 -> int2: That chafing pneumoconiosis occurs.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | This unrhythmicness happens. | {D} | fact1: That this starring Tesla happens hold. fact2: If this gratifying regret happens that renewableness occurs. fact3: This hindering poppycock does not happens if that that vivisection and that partisanness happens does not hold. fact4: If the fact that that cuprousness does not happens and this cerebrospinalness does not occurs does not hold then this cerebrospinalness occurs. fact5: The Laws occurs if that unfilledness does not happens. fact6: That that renewableness occurs causes the fact that that that augiticness and/or that non-unrhythmicness occurs is correct. fact7: That lunching Herat does not occurs. fact8: If that augiticness happens or this unrhythmicness does not occurs or both then this unrhythmicness does not happens. fact9: That this unrhythmicness does not happens is prevented by that that inviting Langley does not occurs. fact10: The fact that that unknowableness and that biochemicalness occurs is false if that remedying does not occurs. fact11: That that non-cuprousness and that non-cerebrospinalness occurs is false if this starring Tesla does not occurs. fact12: That corruptedness occurs. fact13: That that both that vivisection and that partisanness occurs is wrong is not wrong if that unknowableness does not happens. fact14: The slip occurs. fact15: This briefing does not happens. fact16: If that cuprousness does not happens that inviting Langley does not happens. fact17: That unknowableness does not occurs if the fact that both that unknowableness and that biochemicalness occurs does not hold. fact18: This gratifying regret occurs and this gnarling oxytone happens if this hindering poppycock does not occurs. fact19: That cuprousness does not occurs if this starring Tesla occurs. fact20: That inviting Langley happens and that renewableness does not happens if that that augiticness happens is correct. | fact1: {A} fact2: {G} -> {E} fact3: ¬({K} & {J}) -> ¬{I} fact4: ¬(¬{B} & ¬{II}) -> {II} fact5: ¬{U} -> {CD} fact6: {E} -> ({F} v ¬{D}) fact7: ¬{AD} fact8: ({F} v ¬{D}) -> ¬{D} fact9: ¬{C} -> {D} fact10: ¬{N} -> ¬({L} & {M}) fact11: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{B} & ¬{II}) fact12: {FB} fact13: ¬{L} -> ¬({K} & {J}) fact14: {CQ} fact15: ¬{HT} fact16: ¬{B} -> ¬{C} fact17: ¬({L} & {M}) -> ¬{L} fact18: ¬{I} -> ({G} & {H}) fact19: {A} -> ¬{B} fact20: {F} -> ({C} & ¬{E}) | [
"fact19 & fact1 -> int1: That cuprousness does not occurs.; int1 & fact16 -> int2: That inviting Langley does not happens.; int2 & fact9 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact19 & fact1 -> int1: ¬{B}; int1 & fact16 -> int2: ¬{C}; int2 & fact9 -> hypothesis;"
] | The fact that this unrhythmicness does not happens hold. | ¬{D} | [] | 6 | 3 | 3 | 16 | 0 | 16 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That this starring Tesla happens hold. fact2: If this gratifying regret happens that renewableness occurs. fact3: This hindering poppycock does not happens if that that vivisection and that partisanness happens does not hold. fact4: If the fact that that cuprousness does not happens and this cerebrospinalness does not occurs does not hold then this cerebrospinalness occurs. fact5: The Laws occurs if that unfilledness does not happens. fact6: That that renewableness occurs causes the fact that that that augiticness and/or that non-unrhythmicness occurs is correct. fact7: That lunching Herat does not occurs. fact8: If that augiticness happens or this unrhythmicness does not occurs or both then this unrhythmicness does not happens. fact9: That this unrhythmicness does not happens is prevented by that that inviting Langley does not occurs. fact10: The fact that that unknowableness and that biochemicalness occurs is false if that remedying does not occurs. fact11: That that non-cuprousness and that non-cerebrospinalness occurs is false if this starring Tesla does not occurs. fact12: That corruptedness occurs. fact13: That that both that vivisection and that partisanness occurs is wrong is not wrong if that unknowableness does not happens. fact14: The slip occurs. fact15: This briefing does not happens. fact16: If that cuprousness does not happens that inviting Langley does not happens. fact17: That unknowableness does not occurs if the fact that both that unknowableness and that biochemicalness occurs does not hold. fact18: This gratifying regret occurs and this gnarling oxytone happens if this hindering poppycock does not occurs. fact19: That cuprousness does not occurs if this starring Tesla occurs. fact20: That inviting Langley happens and that renewableness does not happens if that that augiticness happens is correct. ; $hypothesis$ = This unrhythmicness happens. ; $proof$ = | fact19 & fact1 -> int1: That cuprousness does not occurs.; int1 & fact16 -> int2: That inviting Langley does not happens.; int2 & fact9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That everything is a project is incorrect. | ¬((x): {A}x) | fact1: Every man exhales AMEX. fact2: Everything does snip lepidoptery. fact3: Everything is a Valois. fact4: Every person is not a dreaming. fact5: Everything does focalize. fact6: Something that does not avoid Littorinidae is both not a Everest and not undescriptive. fact7: Everything is supernal. fact8: Every person damns passiveness. fact9: Everything is caducous. fact10: Everyone is unarmed. fact11: That some man is not a project and is a Everest does not hold if this person is undescriptive. fact12: The fact that every person is a kind of a Uropygi is right. fact13: Everybody is a Weimar. fact14: Everything is a kind of a longhand. fact15: Everything is a Carolingian. fact16: Something is a integrality if it is a project. fact17: Something is genuine and is a project if that is not a Everest. fact18: Everything does steal Elbe. fact19: Everyone is a kind of a project. fact20: Someone that is not a dreaming is a kind of liveable a Triassic. fact21: Every person is biaxal. | fact1: (x): {FR}x fact2: (x): {S}x fact3: (x): {GF}x fact4: (x): ¬{H}x fact5: (x): {CC}x fact6: (x): ¬{D}x -> (¬{B}x & ¬{C}x) fact7: (x): {EE}x fact8: (x): {HJ}x fact9: (x): {EU}x fact10: (x): {FJ}x fact11: (x): {C}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & {B}x) fact12: (x): {HL}x fact13: (x): {DT}x fact14: (x): {FO}x fact15: (x): {EL}x fact16: (x): {A}x -> {DE}x fact17: (x): ¬{B}x -> ({HO}x & {A}x) fact18: (x): {IT}x fact19: (x): {A}x fact20: (x): ¬{H}x -> ({G}x & {F}x) fact21: (x): {CQ}x | [
"fact19 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact19 -> hypothesis;"
] | That every man is a kind of a integrality hold. | (x): {DE}x | [
"fact23 -> int1: This tampon is a kind of a integrality if this tampon is a kind of a project.; fact22 -> int2: If this tampon is undescriptive then the fact that it is not a project and it is a Everest does not hold.;"
] | 5 | 1 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 20 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Every man exhales AMEX. fact2: Everything does snip lepidoptery. fact3: Everything is a Valois. fact4: Every person is not a dreaming. fact5: Everything does focalize. fact6: Something that does not avoid Littorinidae is both not a Everest and not undescriptive. fact7: Everything is supernal. fact8: Every person damns passiveness. fact9: Everything is caducous. fact10: Everyone is unarmed. fact11: That some man is not a project and is a Everest does not hold if this person is undescriptive. fact12: The fact that every person is a kind of a Uropygi is right. fact13: Everybody is a Weimar. fact14: Everything is a kind of a longhand. fact15: Everything is a Carolingian. fact16: Something is a integrality if it is a project. fact17: Something is genuine and is a project if that is not a Everest. fact18: Everything does steal Elbe. fact19: Everyone is a kind of a project. fact20: Someone that is not a dreaming is a kind of liveable a Triassic. fact21: Every person is biaxal. ; $hypothesis$ = That everything is a project is incorrect. ; $proof$ = | fact19 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That Rorschach does not happens. | ¬{D} | fact1: If that retaking does not happens the fact that that Rorschach occurs and that annihilating Vanderbilt occurs hold. fact2: Both that annihilating Vanderbilt and that retaking happens. fact3: That batting occurs and this scuffing compliancy happens. fact4: That Rorschach does not occurs if both that batting and that retaking happens. | fact1: ¬{B} -> ({D} & {A}) fact2: ({A} & {B}) fact3: ({C} & {E}) fact4: ({C} & {B}) -> ¬{D} | [
"fact2 -> int1: That retaking occurs.; fact3 -> int2: That batting occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That batting and that retaking occurs.; int3 & fact4 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact2 -> int1: {B}; fact3 -> int2: {C}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ({C} & {B}); int3 & fact4 -> hypothesis;"
] | That Rorschach occurs. | {D} | [] | 6 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If that retaking does not happens the fact that that Rorschach occurs and that annihilating Vanderbilt occurs hold. fact2: Both that annihilating Vanderbilt and that retaking happens. fact3: That batting occurs and this scuffing compliancy happens. fact4: That Rorschach does not occurs if both that batting and that retaking happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That Rorschach does not happens. ; $proof$ = | fact2 -> int1: That retaking occurs.; fact3 -> int2: That batting occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That batting and that retaking occurs.; int3 & fact4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That diaphragm is a Calorie. | {A}{b} | fact1: The fact that something is a kind of a incaution and does not junk gibibit is incorrect if it is a implicitness. fact2: Some man that is not a incaution either is a genie or is a kind of a shout or both. fact3: The golem is not a MacLeish. fact4: The fact that this Ostariophysi is not a rear and/or it is not a perceptibility is incorrect. fact5: If that Riffian is not a Calorie that diaphragm is not a kind of a rear. fact6: That Riffian is not a Calorie if that diaphragm is not a rear. fact7: That Galilaean is a implicitness that is a Pithecolobium if the golem is not a kind of a MacLeish. fact8: If the fact that that either that Riffian is not a permutability or the thing does not mosh or both is incorrect is right that Riffian is not a rear. fact9: That Riffian moshes. fact10: That that Riffian either is not a permutability or does not mosh or both is not correct. fact11: That diaphragm is a rear that is a Calorie if that Riffian is not a genie. fact12: That that Riffian either is not a Calorie or does not mosh or both is false. fact13: If that either that Riffian is not a permutability or it moshes or both is incorrect then it is not a kind of a rear. fact14: If that something is a kind of a incaution that does not junk gibibit is false it is not a kind of a incaution. fact15: If that diaphragm is not a permutability then that Riffian is not a Calorie. | fact1: (x): {G}x -> ¬({E}x & ¬{F}x) fact2: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({C}x v {D}x) fact3: ¬{I}{d} fact4: ¬(¬{B}{fb} v ¬{BL}{fb}) fact5: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{B}{b} fact6: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬{A}{a} fact7: ¬{I}{d} -> ({G}{c} & {H}{c}) fact8: ¬(¬{AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact9: {AB}{a} fact10: ¬(¬{AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) fact11: ¬{C}{a} -> ({B}{b} & {A}{b}) fact12: ¬(¬{A}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) fact13: ¬(¬{AA}{a} v {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact14: (x): ¬({E}x & ¬{F}x) -> ¬{E}x fact15: ¬{AA}{b} -> ¬{A}{a} | [
"fact8 & fact10 -> int1: That Riffian is not a rear.;"
] | [
"fact8 & fact10 -> int1: ¬{B}{a};"
] | That diaphragm is a Calorie. | {A}{b} | [
"fact19 -> int2: If that Galilaean is not a incaution that Galilaean is a genie or he/she is a shout or both.; fact21 -> int3: If the fact that that Galilaean is a kind of a incaution but she does not junk gibibit does not hold then she is not a incaution.; fact18 -> int4: If the fact that that Galilaean is a kind of a implicitness is not wrong the fact that that that Galilaean is a kind of a incaution that does not junk gibibit is correct is false.; fact20 & fact17 -> int5: That Galilaean is a kind of a implicitness and is a Pithecolobium.; int5 -> int6: That Galilaean is a implicitness.; int4 & int6 -> int7: That that Galilaean is a incaution but it does not junk gibibit is false.; int3 & int7 -> int8: That Galilaean is not a incaution.; int2 & int8 -> int9: That Galilaean is a genie and/or it is a kind of a shout.;"
] | 8 | 2 | null | 13 | 0 | 13 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: The fact that something is a kind of a incaution and does not junk gibibit is incorrect if it is a implicitness. fact2: Some man that is not a incaution either is a genie or is a kind of a shout or both. fact3: The golem is not a MacLeish. fact4: The fact that this Ostariophysi is not a rear and/or it is not a perceptibility is incorrect. fact5: If that Riffian is not a Calorie that diaphragm is not a kind of a rear. fact6: That Riffian is not a Calorie if that diaphragm is not a rear. fact7: That Galilaean is a implicitness that is a Pithecolobium if the golem is not a kind of a MacLeish. fact8: If the fact that that either that Riffian is not a permutability or the thing does not mosh or both is incorrect is right that Riffian is not a rear. fact9: That Riffian moshes. fact10: That that Riffian either is not a permutability or does not mosh or both is not correct. fact11: That diaphragm is a rear that is a Calorie if that Riffian is not a genie. fact12: That that Riffian either is not a Calorie or does not mosh or both is false. fact13: If that either that Riffian is not a permutability or it moshes or both is incorrect then it is not a kind of a rear. fact14: If that something is a kind of a incaution that does not junk gibibit is false it is not a kind of a incaution. fact15: If that diaphragm is not a permutability then that Riffian is not a Calorie. ; $hypothesis$ = That diaphragm is a Calorie. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | This colouring does not proselytise Sciuromorpha. | ¬{C}{a} | fact1: Something does not intrude. fact2: The meteorite sleds Hypoxidaceae but it does not intrude. fact3: This colouring proselytises Sciuromorpha if something that sleds Hypoxidaceae does not intrude. fact4: Something does not proselytise Sciuromorpha if the fact that it does not sled Hypoxidaceae is right. fact5: There is something such that it sleds Hypoxidaceae. | fact1: (Ex): ¬{B}x fact2: ({A}{aa} & ¬{B}{aa}) fact3: (x): ({A}x & ¬{B}x) -> {C}{a} fact4: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬{C}x fact5: (Ex): {A}x | [
"fact2 -> int1: Somebody sleds Hypoxidaceae but he does not intrude.; int1 & fact3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact2 -> int1: (Ex): ({A}x & ¬{B}x); int1 & fact3 -> hypothesis;"
] | This colouring does not proselytise Sciuromorpha. | ¬{C}{a} | [
"fact6 -> int2: If this colouring does not sled Hypoxidaceae this colouring does not proselytise Sciuromorpha.;"
] | 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 3 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Something does not intrude. fact2: The meteorite sleds Hypoxidaceae but it does not intrude. fact3: This colouring proselytises Sciuromorpha if something that sleds Hypoxidaceae does not intrude. fact4: Something does not proselytise Sciuromorpha if the fact that it does not sled Hypoxidaceae is right. fact5: There is something such that it sleds Hypoxidaceae. ; $hypothesis$ = This colouring does not proselytise Sciuromorpha. ; $proof$ = | fact2 -> int1: Somebody sleds Hypoxidaceae but he does not intrude.; int1 & fact3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That that anadromousness occurs and that rescheduling maidhood does not happens is false. | ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) | fact1: Notthis Nipponese but this conjunctiveness occurs. fact2: If this chicanery does not occurs then that anadromousness and this headlock occurs. fact3: If this digitalization does not occurs that that rescheduling maidhood happens and the Togolese occurs is wrong. fact4: If the fact that both that Citation and that antiquing Pomacentrus happens is wrong that Citation does not happens. fact5: The fact that both that Citation and that antiquing Pomacentrus occurs does not hold if this Nipponese does not occurs. fact6: That this chicanery happens is prevented by that that Citation does not happens. fact7: If the fact that that rescheduling maidhood happens and the Togolese happens is not correct then that rescheduling maidhood does not occurs. fact8: That that anadromousness occurs and that rescheduling maidhood does not happens is false. | fact1: (¬{G} & {K}) fact2: ¬{B} -> ({AA} & {A}) fact3: ¬{E} -> ¬({AB} & {C}) fact4: ¬({D} & {F}) -> ¬{D} fact5: ¬{G} -> ¬({D} & {F}) fact6: ¬{D} -> ¬{B} fact7: ¬({AB} & {C}) -> ¬{AB} fact8: ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) | [
"fact8 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact8 -> hypothesis;"
] | That anadromousness occurs and that rescheduling maidhood does not occurs. | ({AA} & ¬{AB}) | [
"fact10 -> int1: This Nipponese does not happens.; fact13 & int1 -> int2: That that Citation and that antiquing Pomacentrus occurs is false.; fact9 & int2 -> int3: That Citation does not happens.; fact12 & int3 -> int4: This chicanery does not happens.; fact15 & int4 -> int5: Both that anadromousness and this headlock happens.; int5 -> int6: That anadromousness occurs.;"
] | 7 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 7 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Notthis Nipponese but this conjunctiveness occurs. fact2: If this chicanery does not occurs then that anadromousness and this headlock occurs. fact3: If this digitalization does not occurs that that rescheduling maidhood happens and the Togolese occurs is wrong. fact4: If the fact that both that Citation and that antiquing Pomacentrus happens is wrong that Citation does not happens. fact5: The fact that both that Citation and that antiquing Pomacentrus occurs does not hold if this Nipponese does not occurs. fact6: That this chicanery happens is prevented by that that Citation does not happens. fact7: If the fact that that rescheduling maidhood happens and the Togolese happens is not correct then that rescheduling maidhood does not occurs. fact8: That that anadromousness occurs and that rescheduling maidhood does not happens is false. ; $hypothesis$ = That that anadromousness occurs and that rescheduling maidhood does not happens is false. ; $proof$ = | fact8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | This impedance does not occurs. | ¬{D} | fact1: This seiche occurs if this comic occurs. fact2: That that itemization but notthat victimising blondness happens is not correct if that mercilessness does not happens. fact3: This seiche occurs if the Liverpudlian occurs. fact4: That this comic occurs and the Liverpudlian does not occurs is incorrect if this pyemicness occurs. fact5: The fact that this comic does not happens is true if that that this comic but notthe Liverpudlian happens does not hold is right. fact6: If that this comic does not occurs is correct then that notthis impedance but this seiche happens is not correct. fact7: That mercilessness occurs and that victimising blondness happens. fact8: That landlessness does not occurs if that chelateding trusting happens and that overbalancing Dumuzi occurs. fact9: If the fact that that itemization but notthat victimising blondness happens does not hold then that itemization does not occurs. fact10: If the fact that that landlessness does not happens is right this pyemicness happens and this vowing leisureliness happens. fact11: The fact that this impedance does not occurs is right if both that mercilessness and this seiche occurs. fact12: The non-subduralness causes that the shrilling happens and that engrossing happens. fact13: The fact that that overbalancing Dumuzi happens hold if that superciliousness occurs. fact14: That chelateding trusting happens if the shrilling happens. fact15: The subduralness does not happens. | fact1: {E} -> {C} fact2: ¬{A} -> ¬({DL} & ¬{B}) fact3: {F} -> {C} fact4: {G} -> ¬({E} & ¬{F}) fact5: ¬({E} & ¬{F}) -> ¬{E} fact6: ¬{E} -> ¬(¬{D} & {C}) fact7: ({A} & {B}) fact8: ({K} & {J}) -> ¬{I} fact9: ¬({DL} & ¬{B}) -> ¬{DL} fact10: ¬{I} -> ({G} & {H}) fact11: ({A} & {C}) -> ¬{D} fact12: ¬{P} -> ({L} & {O}) fact13: {M} -> {J} fact14: {L} -> {K} fact15: ¬{P} | [
"fact7 -> int1: That mercilessness happens.;"
] | [
"fact7 -> int1: {A};"
] | That itemization does not happens. | ¬{DL} | [
"fact16 & fact25 -> int2: Both the shrilling and that engrossing happens.; int2 -> int3: The shrilling happens.; fact20 & int3 -> int4: That chelateding trusting occurs.;"
] | 13 | 3 | null | 11 | 0 | 11 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: This seiche occurs if this comic occurs. fact2: That that itemization but notthat victimising blondness happens is not correct if that mercilessness does not happens. fact3: This seiche occurs if the Liverpudlian occurs. fact4: That this comic occurs and the Liverpudlian does not occurs is incorrect if this pyemicness occurs. fact5: The fact that this comic does not happens is true if that that this comic but notthe Liverpudlian happens does not hold is right. fact6: If that this comic does not occurs is correct then that notthis impedance but this seiche happens is not correct. fact7: That mercilessness occurs and that victimising blondness happens. fact8: That landlessness does not occurs if that chelateding trusting happens and that overbalancing Dumuzi occurs. fact9: If the fact that that itemization but notthat victimising blondness happens does not hold then that itemization does not occurs. fact10: If the fact that that landlessness does not happens is right this pyemicness happens and this vowing leisureliness happens. fact11: The fact that this impedance does not occurs is right if both that mercilessness and this seiche occurs. fact12: The non-subduralness causes that the shrilling happens and that engrossing happens. fact13: The fact that that overbalancing Dumuzi happens hold if that superciliousness occurs. fact14: That chelateding trusting happens if the shrilling happens. fact15: The subduralness does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = This impedance does not occurs. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That that headland is a Qaeda but the thing is not nondisposable is incorrect. | ¬({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) | fact1: The fact that that headland is a Qaeda and he is not disposable does not hold. fact2: The fact that this tomboy tuckers punctiliousness and it is a Qaeda is not true. fact3: This tomboy tuckers punctiliousness. fact4: this punctiliousness tuckers tomboy. fact5: If the fact that that headland tuckers punctiliousness is true that this tomboy is a Qaeda but it is not nondisposable is wrong. fact6: If this tomboy tuckers punctiliousness that that headland is a kind of a Qaeda but it is not nondisposable is not right. fact7: That this odontiasis is a kind of a cadaster and that person is a kind of a Qaeda does not hold. fact8: The fact that this tomboy tuckers punctiliousness and he is nondisposable does not hold if that headland is a Qaeda. fact9: The fact that that headland does tucker punctiliousness and is nondisposable is wrong. fact10: The fact that the coriander is a kind of a NAWCWPNS that is not a Acanthocereus is not true. fact11: The fact that that headland does pulse Lisboa and that is guttural is false. | fact1: ¬({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact2: ¬({A}{a} & {AA}{a}) fact3: {A}{a} fact4: {AC}{aa} fact5: {A}{b} -> ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact6: {A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact7: ¬({ER}{au} & {AA}{au}) fact8: {AA}{b} -> ¬({A}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact9: ¬({A}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact10: ¬({ET}{cu} & ¬{DT}{cu}) fact11: ¬({HP}{b} & {BU}{b}) | [
"fact6 & fact3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact6 & fact3 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 9 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: The fact that that headland is a Qaeda and he is not disposable does not hold. fact2: The fact that this tomboy tuckers punctiliousness and it is a Qaeda is not true. fact3: This tomboy tuckers punctiliousness. fact4: this punctiliousness tuckers tomboy. fact5: If the fact that that headland tuckers punctiliousness is true that this tomboy is a Qaeda but it is not nondisposable is wrong. fact6: If this tomboy tuckers punctiliousness that that headland is a kind of a Qaeda but it is not nondisposable is not right. fact7: That this odontiasis is a kind of a cadaster and that person is a kind of a Qaeda does not hold. fact8: The fact that this tomboy tuckers punctiliousness and he is nondisposable does not hold if that headland is a Qaeda. fact9: The fact that that headland does tucker punctiliousness and is nondisposable is wrong. fact10: The fact that the coriander is a kind of a NAWCWPNS that is not a Acanthocereus is not true. fact11: The fact that that headland does pulse Lisboa and that is guttural is false. ; $hypothesis$ = That that headland is a Qaeda but the thing is not nondisposable is incorrect. ; $proof$ = | fact6 & fact3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That that this degrading krone occurs and this conducing occurs is not incorrect is wrong. | ¬({A} & {B}) | fact1: That treating semicentennial occurs. fact2: If that fagoting bibbed does not occurs then that the fact that this degrading krone and this conducing occurs does not hold is true. fact3: That this unionising rosary and this degrading krone happens is caused by that this conducing does not occurs. fact4: This degrading krone occurs. fact5: That sabbatical happens. | fact1: {FA} fact2: ¬{C} -> ¬({A} & {B}) fact3: ¬{B} -> ({II} & {A}) fact4: {A} fact5: {HD} | [] | [] | That that this degrading krone occurs and this conducing occurs is not incorrect is wrong. | ¬({A} & {B}) | [] | 6 | 1 | null | 4 | 0 | 4 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That treating semicentennial occurs. fact2: If that fagoting bibbed does not occurs then that the fact that this degrading krone and this conducing occurs does not hold is true. fact3: That this unionising rosary and this degrading krone happens is caused by that this conducing does not occurs. fact4: This degrading krone occurs. fact5: That sabbatical happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That that this degrading krone occurs and this conducing occurs is not incorrect is wrong. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That cacodylicness does not occurs and this unregeneratedness does not occurs. | (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) | fact1: That that unwholesomeness happens and that uniformed does not occurs prevents this libration. fact2: That that laxative does not happens hold if that that keeping or that protraction or both occurs is incorrect. fact3: If this libration does not happens both that protraction and that keeping happens. fact4: If both that non-unwholesomeness and that uniformed occurs that this libration does not happens hold. fact5: The fact that that intercession does not occurs and the syncreticness does not happens is false. fact6: That the fact that that non-cacodylicness and this unregeneratedness happens does not hold is right if that keeping does not occurs. fact7: The fact that that keeping or that protraction or both happens is incorrect if this libration does not occurs. fact8: That that keeping occurs yields that both that non-cacodylicness and that non-unregeneratedness occurs. fact9: The fact that that non-cacodylicness and this unregeneratedness occurs does not hold. fact10: That that cacodylicness and that non-unregeneratedness happens is false if that keeping does not occurs. fact11: If this ravishing does not happens this tantalization occurs and/or that Downingness happens. fact12: That this unaccompaniedness happens brings about that this showering does not happens and this creeping occurs. fact13: If that keeping does not happens then the fact that both that non-cacodylicness and that non-unregeneratedness happens does not hold. fact14: That keeping does not happens. fact15: That unwholesomeness happens and that uniformed does not occurs if this articularness occurs. fact16: The fact that that cacodylicness occurs but this unregeneratedness does not occurs is false. fact17: If this showering does not happens then this articularness happens and that unblocking Chinookan occurs. | fact1: ({E} & ¬{D}) -> ¬{C} fact2: ¬({A} v {B}) -> ¬{BJ} fact3: ¬{C} -> ({B} & {A}) fact4: (¬{E} & {D}) -> ¬{C} fact5: ¬(¬{FI} & ¬{II}) fact6: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) fact7: ¬{C} -> ¬({A} v {B}) fact8: {A} -> (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) fact9: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) fact10: ¬{A} -> ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) fact11: ¬{M} -> ({L} v {K}) fact12: {J} -> (¬{H} & {I}) fact13: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) fact14: ¬{A} fact15: {F} -> ({E} & ¬{D}) fact16: ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) fact17: ¬{H} -> ({F} & {G}) | [
"fact13 & fact14 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact13 & fact14 -> hypothesis;"
] | That cacodylicness does not occurs and this unregeneratedness does not occurs. | (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) | [] | 12 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 15 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That that unwholesomeness happens and that uniformed does not occurs prevents this libration. fact2: That that laxative does not happens hold if that that keeping or that protraction or both occurs is incorrect. fact3: If this libration does not happens both that protraction and that keeping happens. fact4: If both that non-unwholesomeness and that uniformed occurs that this libration does not happens hold. fact5: The fact that that intercession does not occurs and the syncreticness does not happens is false. fact6: That the fact that that non-cacodylicness and this unregeneratedness happens does not hold is right if that keeping does not occurs. fact7: The fact that that keeping or that protraction or both happens is incorrect if this libration does not occurs. fact8: That that keeping occurs yields that both that non-cacodylicness and that non-unregeneratedness occurs. fact9: The fact that that non-cacodylicness and this unregeneratedness occurs does not hold. fact10: That that cacodylicness and that non-unregeneratedness happens is false if that keeping does not occurs. fact11: If this ravishing does not happens this tantalization occurs and/or that Downingness happens. fact12: That this unaccompaniedness happens brings about that this showering does not happens and this creeping occurs. fact13: If that keeping does not happens then the fact that both that non-cacodylicness and that non-unregeneratedness happens does not hold. fact14: That keeping does not happens. fact15: That unwholesomeness happens and that uniformed does not occurs if this articularness occurs. fact16: The fact that that cacodylicness occurs but this unregeneratedness does not occurs is false. fact17: If this showering does not happens then this articularness happens and that unblocking Chinookan occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That cacodylicness does not occurs and this unregeneratedness does not occurs. ; $proof$ = | fact13 & fact14 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That that blacking does not occurs is true. | ¬{B} | fact1: That the slumber does not occurs and the ecologicness does not happens leads to that the cardinalship does not occurs. fact2: That clogging does not happens and this fuckup does not occurs. fact3: That that clogging does not happens but this fuckup happens prevents that blacking. fact4: If the unwrinkledness does not occurs this premedicalness happens and this baperson occurs. fact5: The kibitzing sixer does not happens and this dithyramb does not occurs. fact6: If the fact that the adjuration occurs and that Amerindicness occurs is incorrect that intemperateness does not occurs. fact7: That that grading Daubentoniidae happens is prevented by that the non-intemperateness and this encrimsoning Polygala happens. fact8: If that clogging does not happens and this fuckup does not happens that blacking does not happens. fact9: That the unwrinkledness does not occurs is caused by that this excision occurs. fact10: Both this excision and that eyeballing lipoidaemia occurs if that grading Daubentoniidae does not occurs. fact11: That indexing Zoarcidae is prevented by that this excision does not occurs and that proving hypallage does not happens. fact12: If this baone happens then notthat proving hypallage but this shattering happens. fact13: Notthe upbraiding Juncaginaceae but that blacking happens if that this shattering happens is not false. fact14: This extermination does not occurs. | fact1: (¬{EQ} & ¬{AL}) -> ¬{CT} fact2: (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) fact3: (¬{AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} fact4: ¬{G} -> ({F} & {E}) fact5: (¬{U} & ¬{DL}) fact6: ¬({M} & {N}) -> ¬{K} fact7: (¬{K} & {L}) -> ¬{J} fact8: (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) -> ¬{B} fact9: {H} -> ¬{G} fact10: ¬{J} -> ({H} & {I}) fact11: (¬{H} & ¬{D}) -> ¬{GM} fact12: {E} -> (¬{D} & {C}) fact13: {C} -> (¬{A} & {B}) fact14: ¬{EI} | [
"fact8 & fact2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact8 & fact2 -> hypothesis;"
] | That blacking happens. | {B} | [] | 12 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 12 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That the slumber does not occurs and the ecologicness does not happens leads to that the cardinalship does not occurs. fact2: That clogging does not happens and this fuckup does not occurs. fact3: That that clogging does not happens but this fuckup happens prevents that blacking. fact4: If the unwrinkledness does not occurs this premedicalness happens and this baperson occurs. fact5: The kibitzing sixer does not happens and this dithyramb does not occurs. fact6: If the fact that the adjuration occurs and that Amerindicness occurs is incorrect that intemperateness does not occurs. fact7: That that grading Daubentoniidae happens is prevented by that the non-intemperateness and this encrimsoning Polygala happens. fact8: If that clogging does not happens and this fuckup does not happens that blacking does not happens. fact9: That the unwrinkledness does not occurs is caused by that this excision occurs. fact10: Both this excision and that eyeballing lipoidaemia occurs if that grading Daubentoniidae does not occurs. fact11: That indexing Zoarcidae is prevented by that this excision does not occurs and that proving hypallage does not happens. fact12: If this baone happens then notthat proving hypallage but this shattering happens. fact13: Notthe upbraiding Juncaginaceae but that blacking happens if that this shattering happens is not false. fact14: This extermination does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That that blacking does not occurs is true. ; $proof$ = | fact8 & fact2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | This etiolateding does not occurs. | ¬{A} | fact1: This bamboozling Tachyglossidae occurs and the tempering happens. fact2: The fact that the robing eulogy does not occurs is not false. fact3: That that disservice occurs and this matricide occurs is caused by that the robing eulogy does not occurs. fact4: The activating occurs. fact5: That both this bamboozling Tachyglossidae and this matricide occurs prevents that the tacking happens. fact6: This etiolateding occurs. fact7: That this glossopharyngealness does not occurs brings about that that sweating gestalt does not happens but this solacing infinitesimal occurs. fact8: If that defrayal does not occurs either this revolutionariness happens or this scrimpiness happens or both. fact9: If the tacking does not happens this malodorousness does not happens and this rearrangement does not occurs. fact10: That defrayal does not occurs if that notthis pairing but the bullfighting occurs is false. fact11: That this pairing does not happens and the bullfighting happens is incorrect if this rearrangement does not happens. fact12: Both this etiolateding and that pleximetry happens if that sweating gestalt does not happens. | fact1: ({M} & {Q}) fact2: ¬{P} fact3: ¬{P} -> ({O} & {N}) fact4: {GQ} fact5: ({M} & {N}) -> ¬{L} fact6: {A} fact7: ¬{D} -> (¬{B} & {C}) fact8: ¬{G} -> ({F} v {E}) fact9: ¬{L} -> (¬{K} & ¬{J}) fact10: ¬(¬{H} & {I}) -> ¬{G} fact11: ¬{J} -> ¬(¬{H} & {I}) fact12: ¬{B} -> ({A} & {BC}) | [
"fact6 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact6 -> hypothesis;"
] | That pleximetry occurs. | {BC} | [
"fact21 -> int1: This bamboozling Tachyglossidae occurs.; fact14 & fact19 -> int2: That disservice happens and this matricide occurs.; int2 -> int3: This matricide happens.; int1 & int3 -> int4: This bamboozling Tachyglossidae happens and this matricide occurs.; fact17 & int4 -> int5: The fact that the tacking does not occurs hold.; fact13 & int5 -> int6: This malodorousness does not happens and this rearrangement does not occurs.; int6 -> int7: This rearrangement does not occurs.; fact22 & int7 -> int8: The fact that this pairing does not occurs and the bullfighting happens is not right.; fact15 & int8 -> int9: That defrayal does not happens.; fact18 & int9 -> int10: This revolutionariness or this scrimpiness or both happens.;"
] | 14 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 11 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: This bamboozling Tachyglossidae occurs and the tempering happens. fact2: The fact that the robing eulogy does not occurs is not false. fact3: That that disservice occurs and this matricide occurs is caused by that the robing eulogy does not occurs. fact4: The activating occurs. fact5: That both this bamboozling Tachyglossidae and this matricide occurs prevents that the tacking happens. fact6: This etiolateding occurs. fact7: That this glossopharyngealness does not occurs brings about that that sweating gestalt does not happens but this solacing infinitesimal occurs. fact8: If that defrayal does not occurs either this revolutionariness happens or this scrimpiness happens or both. fact9: If the tacking does not happens this malodorousness does not happens and this rearrangement does not occurs. fact10: That defrayal does not occurs if that notthis pairing but the bullfighting occurs is false. fact11: That this pairing does not happens and the bullfighting happens is incorrect if this rearrangement does not happens. fact12: Both this etiolateding and that pleximetry happens if that sweating gestalt does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = This etiolateding does not occurs. ; $proof$ = | fact6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | The fact that that countinghouse is a Y2K is right. | {A}{a} | fact1: Something does not stink if that this is a cladistics that is not a disjuncture hold. fact2: That countinghouse is a Y2K and huffs Glaser. fact3: If this bitumen is not non-elfin and it huffs Glaser then that countinghouse is not a Y2K. fact4: That pissing brings if that porgy is archidiaconal. fact5: That some person does not wish plenty is correct if it is a piquance. fact6: That porgy is a dyspnea and is not unfunded. fact7: If that pissing brings the fact that this student entertains hold. fact8: That that porgy is a kind of a disjuncture but it does not ghost Aspinwall is wrong if it is pedagogical. fact9: If something does not wish plenty then it is not non-elfin and huffs Glaser. fact10: The adjustment is a Y2K and is a Pinnotheridae. fact11: Something is archidiaconal and is a natal if it does not stink. fact12: If the fact that that porgy is a disjuncture but it does not ghost Aspinwall does not hold then that it is not a disjuncture is true. fact13: If that porgy is a kind of a dyspnea but it is not unfunded it is a kind of a Arminian. fact14: The fact that this bitumen is a piquance hold if that Mt is a kind of a Scincidae. fact15: If some person is both not a Saratoga and not a dacryocystitis this person is not non-pedagogical. fact16: That Mt is a Scincidae if this student entertains. fact17: If that porgy is a kind of a Arminian the person is a cladistics. | fact1: (x): ({M}x & ¬{L}x) -> ¬{K}x fact2: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact3: ({C}{b} & {B}{b}) -> ¬{A}{a} fact4: {I}{f} -> {H}{e} fact5: (x): {E}x -> ¬{D}x fact6: ({S}{f} & ¬{T}{f}) fact7: {H}{e} -> {G}{d} fact8: {N}{f} -> ¬({L}{f} & ¬{O}{f}) fact9: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({C}x & {B}x) fact10: ({A}{in} & {DP}{in}) fact11: (x): ¬{K}x -> ({I}x & {J}x) fact12: ¬({L}{f} & ¬{O}{f}) -> ¬{L}{f} fact13: ({S}{f} & ¬{T}{f}) -> {R}{f} fact14: {F}{c} -> {E}{b} fact15: (x): (¬{Q}x & ¬{P}x) -> {N}x fact16: {G}{d} -> {F}{c} fact17: {R}{f} -> {M}{f} | [
"fact2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact2 -> hypothesis;"
] | That countinghouse is not a Y2K. | ¬{A}{a} | [
"fact28 -> int1: If this bitumen does not wish plenty this person is elfin and this person huffs Glaser.; fact20 -> int2: This bitumen does not wish plenty if this bitumen is a piquance.; fact23 -> int3: That porgy is archidiaconal and this one is a natal if this one does not stink.; fact19 -> int4: That porgy does not stink if the fact that that porgy is a cladistics but it is not a disjuncture hold.; fact24 & fact26 -> int5: The fact that that porgy is a Arminian is correct.; fact31 & int5 -> int6: That porgy is a cladistics.; fact21 -> int7: If that porgy is both not a Saratoga and not a dacryocystitis it is pedagogical.;"
] | 15 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 0 | 16 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Something does not stink if that this is a cladistics that is not a disjuncture hold. fact2: That countinghouse is a Y2K and huffs Glaser. fact3: If this bitumen is not non-elfin and it huffs Glaser then that countinghouse is not a Y2K. fact4: That pissing brings if that porgy is archidiaconal. fact5: That some person does not wish plenty is correct if it is a piquance. fact6: That porgy is a dyspnea and is not unfunded. fact7: If that pissing brings the fact that this student entertains hold. fact8: That that porgy is a kind of a disjuncture but it does not ghost Aspinwall is wrong if it is pedagogical. fact9: If something does not wish plenty then it is not non-elfin and huffs Glaser. fact10: The adjustment is a Y2K and is a Pinnotheridae. fact11: Something is archidiaconal and is a natal if it does not stink. fact12: If the fact that that porgy is a disjuncture but it does not ghost Aspinwall does not hold then that it is not a disjuncture is true. fact13: If that porgy is a kind of a dyspnea but it is not unfunded it is a kind of a Arminian. fact14: The fact that this bitumen is a piquance hold if that Mt is a kind of a Scincidae. fact15: If some person is both not a Saratoga and not a dacryocystitis this person is not non-pedagogical. fact16: That Mt is a Scincidae if this student entertains. fact17: If that porgy is a kind of a Arminian the person is a cladistics. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that countinghouse is a Y2K is right. ; $proof$ = | fact2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | This caribe is a Tbit that is pyrolytic. | ({C}{a} & {D}{a}) | fact1: the counterproposal does not compromise caribe. fact2: Something is pyrolytic if the thing accents Khios. fact3: If something is a kind of a grail it is a commemorative. fact4: The Raffia is a PAC if the Raffia does not travel but it blithers. fact5: If something does not compromise counterproposal and is a Casuarinaceae it is a Tbit. fact6: This caribe accents Khios and it is a PAC. fact7: This caribe is a Casuarinaceae. | fact1: ¬{AA}{aa} fact2: (x): {E}x -> {D}x fact3: (x): {FI}x -> {DI}x fact4: (¬{AH}{gi} & {AQ}{gi}) -> {F}{gi} fact5: (x): (¬{A}x & {B}x) -> {C}x fact6: ({E}{a} & {F}{a}) fact7: {B}{a} | [
"fact5 -> int1: This caribe is a Tbit if this caribe does not compromise counterproposal but this is a kind of a Casuarinaceae.; fact2 -> int2: If this caribe does accent Khios then it is pyrolytic.; fact6 -> int3: This caribe accents Khios.; int2 & int3 -> int4: This caribe is pyrolytic.;"
] | [
"fact5 -> int1: (¬{A}{a} & {B}{a}) -> {C}{a}; fact2 -> int2: {E}{a} -> {D}{a}; fact6 -> int3: {E}{a}; int2 & int3 -> int4: {D}{a};"
] | null | null | [] | null | 3 | null | 3 | 0 | 3 | UNKNOWN | null | UNKNOWN | null | $facts$ = fact1: the counterproposal does not compromise caribe. fact2: Something is pyrolytic if the thing accents Khios. fact3: If something is a kind of a grail it is a commemorative. fact4: The Raffia is a PAC if the Raffia does not travel but it blithers. fact5: If something does not compromise counterproposal and is a Casuarinaceae it is a Tbit. fact6: This caribe accents Khios and it is a PAC. fact7: This caribe is a Casuarinaceae. ; $hypothesis$ = This caribe is a Tbit that is pyrolytic. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | This reserve does not unclasp buoy. | ¬{B}{aa} | fact1: This baccy is a lightheartedness. fact2: This reserve unclasps buoy if that does source Eurylaimidae and does not iodinate Stockholm. fact3: If someone is not a loneliness then that she/he is a Bukharin and she/he does not respond Hindi is not right. fact4: Something does not boo indeterminateness if it is a lightheartedness and is a Asiatic. fact5: this Hindi does not respond reserve. fact6: This reserve does not source Eurylaimidae if that one does not respond Hindi. fact7: This reserve does not source Eurylaimidae. fact8: This reserve does not respond Hindi. fact9: If something sources Eurylaimidae and does not iodinate Stockholm it unclasps buoy. fact10: Somebody does unclasp buoy but the one does not respond Hindi if the one is a kind of a Bukharin. fact11: This reserve iodinates Stockholm if it is not a Suharto and it does not chip Vermont. fact12: If that that protectionist is a Bukharin but the person does not respond Hindi is not right this reserve does not unclasp buoy. fact13: That someone is not a loneliness and she/he is not a kind of a Megaloptera is false if she/he does not boo indeterminateness. fact14: If that somebody is not a loneliness and she/he is not a Megaloptera does not hold she/he is a kind of a Bukharin. fact15: The fact that that protectionist is not a loneliness if the fact that this vitality is not a loneliness and boos indeterminateness is not correct is right. fact16: If something that does not source Eurylaimidae does not iodinate Stockholm then that thing unclasps buoy. | fact1: {H}{dh} fact2: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} fact3: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬({C}x & ¬{A}x) fact4: (x): ({H}x & {G}x) -> ¬{F}x fact5: ¬{AD}{ac} fact6: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬{AA}{aa} fact7: ¬{AA}{aa} fact8: ¬{A}{aa} fact9: (x): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x fact10: (x): {C}x -> ({B}x & ¬{A}x) fact11: (¬{CD}{aa} & ¬{GN}{aa}) -> {AB}{aa} fact12: ¬({C}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) -> ¬{B}{aa} fact13: (x): ¬{F}x -> ¬(¬{D}x & ¬{E}x) fact14: (x): ¬(¬{D}x & ¬{E}x) -> {C}x fact15: ¬(¬{D}{b} & {F}{b}) -> ¬{D}{a} fact16: (x): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x | [
"fact16 -> int1: If this reserve does not source Eurylaimidae and does not iodinate Stockholm it unclasps buoy.;"
] | [
"fact16 -> int1: (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa};"
] | This baccy unclasps buoy. | {B}{dh} | [
"fact17 -> int2: The fact that this baccy unclasps buoy but this one does not respond Hindi hold if this one is a Bukharin.; fact19 -> int3: If the fact that that this baccy is not a loneliness and is not a Megaloptera hold does not hold then the thing is a Bukharin.; fact20 -> int4: If this baccy does not boo indeterminateness the fact that that she is both not a loneliness and not a Megaloptera is true is wrong.; fact21 -> int5: If this baccy is a kind of a lightheartedness and is a kind of a Asiatic then it does not boo indeterminateness.;"
] | 6 | 2 | null | 14 | 0 | 14 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: This baccy is a lightheartedness. fact2: This reserve unclasps buoy if that does source Eurylaimidae and does not iodinate Stockholm. fact3: If someone is not a loneliness then that she/he is a Bukharin and she/he does not respond Hindi is not right. fact4: Something does not boo indeterminateness if it is a lightheartedness and is a Asiatic. fact5: this Hindi does not respond reserve. fact6: This reserve does not source Eurylaimidae if that one does not respond Hindi. fact7: This reserve does not source Eurylaimidae. fact8: This reserve does not respond Hindi. fact9: If something sources Eurylaimidae and does not iodinate Stockholm it unclasps buoy. fact10: Somebody does unclasp buoy but the one does not respond Hindi if the one is a kind of a Bukharin. fact11: This reserve iodinates Stockholm if it is not a Suharto and it does not chip Vermont. fact12: If that that protectionist is a Bukharin but the person does not respond Hindi is not right this reserve does not unclasp buoy. fact13: That someone is not a loneliness and she/he is not a kind of a Megaloptera is false if she/he does not boo indeterminateness. fact14: If that somebody is not a loneliness and she/he is not a Megaloptera does not hold she/he is a kind of a Bukharin. fact15: The fact that that protectionist is not a loneliness if the fact that this vitality is not a loneliness and boos indeterminateness is not correct is right. fact16: If something that does not source Eurylaimidae does not iodinate Stockholm then that thing unclasps buoy. ; $hypothesis$ = This reserve does not unclasp buoy. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That there exists nobody such that she/he is non-amenorrhoeal one that is a broiling does not hold. | ¬((x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x)) | fact1: That if something boils astuteness it is a Norwegian is true. fact2: There is no man such that it is a decennium and it is a moderating. fact3: There is nothing that does not reunite and does etymologizing costalgia. fact4: There exists nothing such that this does not unhallowed Pascal and inculcates verbosity. fact5: The fact that some man is not a rinderpest but a huddle does not hold if it apes Leptoptilus. fact6: There is nothing that is not a tattered and fasts valiance. fact7: There exists no one that formulates Amerind and does not suspend. fact8: There exists nothing such that it does not boil astuteness and it saponifieds. fact9: There exists nothing that is a kind of amenorrhoeal a broiling. fact10: That something apes Leptoptilus and boils astuteness is false if that is not a Norwegian. fact11: Something is not unintegrated if that it does not formulate Amerind is correct. fact12: A non-unintegrated thing is a kind of bituminoid thing that boils astuteness. fact13: Something does not formulate Amerind if the fact that this thing formulate Amerind and does not suspend is not correct. fact14: If someone is a Norwegian she apes Leptoptilus. fact15: There exists nothing such that it is not amenorrhoeal and it is a broiling. | fact1: (x): {C}x -> {B}x fact2: (x): ¬({CO}x & {EJ}x) fact3: (x): ¬(¬{AF}x & {FO}x) fact4: (x): ¬(¬{IC}x & {GR}x) fact5: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{HS}x & {JF}x) fact6: (x): ¬(¬{GN}x & {BF}x) fact7: (x): ¬({F}x & ¬{H}x) fact8: (x): ¬(¬{C}x & {P}x) fact9: (x): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) fact10: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬({A}x & {C}x) fact11: (x): ¬{F}x -> ¬{E}x fact12: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({D}x & {C}x) fact13: (x): ¬({F}x & ¬{H}x) -> ¬{F}x fact14: (x): {B}x -> {A}x fact15: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) | [
"fact15 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact15 -> hypothesis;"
] | There exists none that is both not a Ochoa and a Bairava. | (x): ¬(¬{BP}x & {JG}x) | [
"fact16 -> int1: If that African is not a kind of a Norwegian that that African apes Leptoptilus and he/she boils astuteness is wrong.;"
] | 5 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 14 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That if something boils astuteness it is a Norwegian is true. fact2: There is no man such that it is a decennium and it is a moderating. fact3: There is nothing that does not reunite and does etymologizing costalgia. fact4: There exists nothing such that this does not unhallowed Pascal and inculcates verbosity. fact5: The fact that some man is not a rinderpest but a huddle does not hold if it apes Leptoptilus. fact6: There is nothing that is not a tattered and fasts valiance. fact7: There exists no one that formulates Amerind and does not suspend. fact8: There exists nothing such that it does not boil astuteness and it saponifieds. fact9: There exists nothing that is a kind of amenorrhoeal a broiling. fact10: That something apes Leptoptilus and boils astuteness is false if that is not a Norwegian. fact11: Something is not unintegrated if that it does not formulate Amerind is correct. fact12: A non-unintegrated thing is a kind of bituminoid thing that boils astuteness. fact13: Something does not formulate Amerind if the fact that this thing formulate Amerind and does not suspend is not correct. fact14: If someone is a Norwegian she apes Leptoptilus. fact15: There exists nothing such that it is not amenorrhoeal and it is a broiling. ; $hypothesis$ = That there exists nobody such that she/he is non-amenorrhoeal one that is a broiling does not hold. ; $proof$ = | fact15 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That orthoclase is not soviet. | ¬{B}{a} | fact1: If the fact that some man is not a Taleban and it does not advertise Lomariopsidaceae is false it is not soviet. fact2: This temblor does not toast and he is not a Pholidota if this temblor colours. fact3: If this temblor is not a Pholidota the fact that that orthoclase is not a Taleban and does not advertise Lomariopsidaceae is wrong. | fact1: (x): ¬(¬{A}x & ¬{C}x) -> ¬{B}x fact2: {F}{b} -> (¬{E}{b} & ¬{D}{b}) fact3: ¬{D}{b} -> ¬(¬{A}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) | [] | [] | That orthoclase is not soviet. | ¬{B}{a} | [
"fact5 -> int1: That orthoclase is not soviet if the fact that she/he is not a kind of a Taleban and does not advertise Lomariopsidaceae is wrong.;"
] | 6 | 1 | null | 3 | 0 | 3 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If the fact that some man is not a Taleban and it does not advertise Lomariopsidaceae is false it is not soviet. fact2: This temblor does not toast and he is not a Pholidota if this temblor colours. fact3: If this temblor is not a Pholidota the fact that that orthoclase is not a Taleban and does not advertise Lomariopsidaceae is wrong. ; $hypothesis$ = That orthoclase is not soviet. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | This housewrecker does not mould majuscule. | ¬{A}{d} | fact1: If someone that is a Sokoro does distend koine then that person is not a kind of a Merman. fact2: That Yanet patronises Albion and is not a Wieland does not hold. fact3: If somebody formalizes recognisance that he is a Sokoro hold. fact4: That burlap formalizes recognisance if that burlap is not a acanthosis. fact5: This housewrecker is a Sokoro if that burlap is a kind of a Sokoro. fact6: That burlap does not patronise Albion if the fact that the fact that this purloo is both not a Wieland and Nestorian does not hold is correct. fact7: If Yanet does not patronise Albion this housewrecker does not mould majuscule. fact8: If someone patronises Albion then this person does mould majuscule. fact9: That this housewrecker distends koine hold if this purloo is Himalayan. fact10: That this purloo is both not a Wieland and Nestorian does not hold. fact11: If somebody is not a Merman it patronises Albion and it jingles prophase. fact12: This purloo is not determinable. fact13: That Beau does not patronise Albion is true. fact14: If this purloo is not Nestorian that burlap does not patronise Albion. fact15: The fact that this housewrecker moulds majuscule and is Nestorian is false. fact16: That burlap is not a acanthosis. fact17: If the fact that Yanet does patronise Albion but he/she does not jingle prophase does not hold then this housewrecker does not mould majuscule. fact18: This purloo does not jingle prophase. fact19: This housewrecker does not jingle prophase. fact20: If that burlap does not patronise Albion then that Yanet does patronise Albion but it does not jingle prophase is false. | fact1: (x): ({E}x & {F}x) -> ¬{D}x fact2: ¬({B}{c} & ¬{AA}{c}) fact3: (x): {H}x -> {E}x fact4: ¬{I}{b} -> {H}{b} fact5: {E}{b} -> {E}{d} fact6: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact7: ¬{B}{c} -> ¬{A}{d} fact8: (x): {B}x -> {A}x fact9: {G}{a} -> {F}{d} fact10: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact11: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({B}x & {C}x) fact12: ¬{CG}{a} fact13: ¬{B}{id} fact14: ¬{AB}{a} -> ¬{B}{b} fact15: ¬({A}{d} & {AB}{d}) fact16: ¬{I}{b} fact17: ¬({B}{c} & ¬{C}{c}) -> ¬{A}{d} fact18: ¬{C}{a} fact19: ¬{C}{d} fact20: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬({B}{c} & ¬{C}{c}) | [
"fact6 & fact10 -> int1: That burlap does not patronise Albion.; int1 & fact20 -> int2: That Yanet patronises Albion but the thing does not jingle prophase is incorrect.; int2 & fact17 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact6 & fact10 -> int1: ¬{B}{b}; int1 & fact20 -> int2: ¬({B}{c} & ¬{C}{c}); int2 & fact17 -> hypothesis;"
] | This housewrecker does mould majuscule. | {A}{d} | [
"fact23 -> int3: If this housewrecker patronises Albion then this housewrecker moulds majuscule.; fact26 -> int4: If this housewrecker is not a Merman then this housewrecker patronises Albion and this jingles prophase.; fact25 -> int5: If this housewrecker is a Sokoro that distends koine then this housewrecker is not a kind of a Merman.; fact28 -> int6: If the fact that that burlap formalizes recognisance is true then that burlap is a Sokoro.; fact27 & fact21 -> int7: That burlap formalizes recognisance.; int6 & int7 -> int8: That burlap is a Sokoro.; fact24 & int8 -> int9: This housewrecker is a kind of a Sokoro.;"
] | 8 | 3 | 3 | 16 | 0 | 16 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If someone that is a Sokoro does distend koine then that person is not a kind of a Merman. fact2: That Yanet patronises Albion and is not a Wieland does not hold. fact3: If somebody formalizes recognisance that he is a Sokoro hold. fact4: That burlap formalizes recognisance if that burlap is not a acanthosis. fact5: This housewrecker is a Sokoro if that burlap is a kind of a Sokoro. fact6: That burlap does not patronise Albion if the fact that the fact that this purloo is both not a Wieland and Nestorian does not hold is correct. fact7: If Yanet does not patronise Albion this housewrecker does not mould majuscule. fact8: If someone patronises Albion then this person does mould majuscule. fact9: That this housewrecker distends koine hold if this purloo is Himalayan. fact10: That this purloo is both not a Wieland and Nestorian does not hold. fact11: If somebody is not a Merman it patronises Albion and it jingles prophase. fact12: This purloo is not determinable. fact13: That Beau does not patronise Albion is true. fact14: If this purloo is not Nestorian that burlap does not patronise Albion. fact15: The fact that this housewrecker moulds majuscule and is Nestorian is false. fact16: That burlap is not a acanthosis. fact17: If the fact that Yanet does patronise Albion but he/she does not jingle prophase does not hold then this housewrecker does not mould majuscule. fact18: This purloo does not jingle prophase. fact19: This housewrecker does not jingle prophase. fact20: If that burlap does not patronise Albion then that Yanet does patronise Albion but it does not jingle prophase is false. ; $hypothesis$ = This housewrecker does not mould majuscule. ; $proof$ = | fact6 & fact10 -> int1: That burlap does not patronise Albion.; int1 & fact20 -> int2: That Yanet patronises Albion but the thing does not jingle prophase is incorrect.; int2 & fact17 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That handiwork does not crosshatch resplendence and it is not a cling. | (¬{C}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) | fact1: If that handiwork is a cling it is malicious. fact2: That toga is a cling if it is a kind of non-malicious thing that does not crosshatch resplendence. fact3: That that that handiwork does not crosshatch resplendence and is a cling hold is incorrect. fact4: If that toga is not phenomenal and the thing does not alert then that the thing is malicious hold. fact5: That handiwork alerts. fact6: The fact that that handiwork does crosshatch resplendence but the thing is not a cling is false if that toga is a cling. fact7: That toga is a kind of a cling if that toga does not crosshatch resplendence and it is not phenomenal. fact8: That toga is not phenomenal and does not alert. fact9: That toga is a pencilled. fact10: The fact that that toga does not alert is correct. fact11: The fact that that handiwork does not crosshatch resplendence but she/he is a cling does not hold if that toga is a cling. fact12: If that either the ornithopod does not clutch Polygonaceae or it is unilateral or both is wrong that sandbur does not clutch Polygonaceae. fact13: That something is not acervate hold if the fact that this thing is acervate and this thing honors unilateralism does not hold. fact14: If something is a Birmingham then this damascenes Afrikaans. fact15: If that toga is not phenomenal but it alerts then that toga is malicious. fact16: That that toga is not phenomenal and does not crosshatch resplendence does not hold if that handiwork crosshatch resplendence. fact17: If that toga is not acervate and it is not malicious that handiwork is malicious. fact18: If the fact that some person is malicious is correct that it is a cling hold. fact19: The fact that that aloe is not unilateral and does not crosshatch resplendence is incorrect. fact20: If that toga does not abet gracility the one does not twin molality and is not malicious. fact21: That that handiwork does crosshatch resplendence but it is not a cling is wrong. fact22: The fact that that toga is acervate and it does honor unilateralism is wrong if that sandbur does not clutch Polygonaceae. fact23: That that handiwork does not crosshatch resplendence and it is not a cling does not hold if that toga is a cling. | fact1: {A}{b} -> {B}{b} fact2: (¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> {A}{a} fact3: ¬(¬{C}{b} & {A}{b}) fact4: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} fact5: {AB}{b} fact6: {A}{a} -> ¬({C}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) fact7: (¬{C}{a} & ¬{AA}{a}) -> {A}{a} fact8: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact9: {IN}{a} fact10: ¬{AB}{a} fact11: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{C}{b} & {A}{b}) fact12: ¬(¬{G}{d} v {I}{d}) -> ¬{G}{c} fact13: (x): ¬({D}x & {E}x) -> ¬{D}x fact14: (x): {EF}x -> {EB}x fact15: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} fact16: {C}{b} -> ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) fact17: (¬{D}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> {B}{b} fact18: (x): {B}x -> {A}x fact19: ¬(¬{I}{hg} & ¬{C}{hg}) fact20: ¬{H}{a} -> (¬{F}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) fact21: ¬({C}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) fact22: ¬{G}{c} -> ¬({D}{a} & {E}{a}) fact23: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{C}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) | [
"fact4 & fact8 -> int1: That that toga is malicious is right.; fact18 -> int2: If that toga is malicious then that is a cling.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That toga is a cling.; int3 & fact23 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact4 & fact8 -> int1: {B}{a}; fact18 -> int2: {B}{a} -> {A}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: {A}{a}; int3 & fact23 -> hypothesis;"
] | That handiwork does not crosshatch resplendence and it is not a cling. | (¬{C}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) | [
"fact25 -> int4: If that the fact that that toga is acervate and he/she honors unilateralism is false hold then he/she is acervate.;"
] | 6 | 3 | 3 | 19 | 0 | 19 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If that handiwork is a cling it is malicious. fact2: That toga is a cling if it is a kind of non-malicious thing that does not crosshatch resplendence. fact3: That that that handiwork does not crosshatch resplendence and is a cling hold is incorrect. fact4: If that toga is not phenomenal and the thing does not alert then that the thing is malicious hold. fact5: That handiwork alerts. fact6: The fact that that handiwork does crosshatch resplendence but the thing is not a cling is false if that toga is a cling. fact7: That toga is a kind of a cling if that toga does not crosshatch resplendence and it is not phenomenal. fact8: That toga is not phenomenal and does not alert. fact9: That toga is a pencilled. fact10: The fact that that toga does not alert is correct. fact11: The fact that that handiwork does not crosshatch resplendence but she/he is a cling does not hold if that toga is a cling. fact12: If that either the ornithopod does not clutch Polygonaceae or it is unilateral or both is wrong that sandbur does not clutch Polygonaceae. fact13: That something is not acervate hold if the fact that this thing is acervate and this thing honors unilateralism does not hold. fact14: If something is a Birmingham then this damascenes Afrikaans. fact15: If that toga is not phenomenal but it alerts then that toga is malicious. fact16: That that toga is not phenomenal and does not crosshatch resplendence does not hold if that handiwork crosshatch resplendence. fact17: If that toga is not acervate and it is not malicious that handiwork is malicious. fact18: If the fact that some person is malicious is correct that it is a cling hold. fact19: The fact that that aloe is not unilateral and does not crosshatch resplendence is incorrect. fact20: If that toga does not abet gracility the one does not twin molality and is not malicious. fact21: That that handiwork does crosshatch resplendence but it is not a cling is wrong. fact22: The fact that that toga is acervate and it does honor unilateralism is wrong if that sandbur does not clutch Polygonaceae. fact23: That that handiwork does not crosshatch resplendence and it is not a cling does not hold if that toga is a cling. ; $hypothesis$ = That handiwork does not crosshatch resplendence and it is not a cling. ; $proof$ = | fact4 & fact8 -> int1: That that toga is malicious is right.; fact18 -> int2: If that toga is malicious then that is a cling.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That toga is a cling.; int3 & fact23 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That hushpuppy is not a madrasa. | ¬{B}{b} | fact1: This sulfonate is a Graminaceae and does not engrave if it does not baby. fact2: If this subsidizer is not a kind of an allograph then this wiper is a kind of a Opuntia or she/he rules doped or both. fact3: the gracility insures wiper. fact4: This subsidizer is not a Graminaceae if this sulfonate is a Graminaceae and does not engrave. fact5: Something that is not a Graminaceae is not an allograph and is not fossorial. fact6: Something is not a madrasa and does not insure gracility if the thing is tuberculate. fact7: This wiper insures gracility. | fact1: ¬{I}{d} -> ({H}{d} & ¬{J}{d}) fact2: ¬{F}{c} -> ({D}{a} v {E}{a}) fact3: {AA}{aa} fact4: ({H}{d} & ¬{J}{d}) -> ¬{H}{c} fact5: (x): ¬{H}x -> (¬{F}x & ¬{G}x) fact6: (x): {C}x -> (¬{B}x & ¬{A}x) fact7: {A}{a} | [] | [] | That hushpuppy is not a madrasa. | ¬{B}{b} | [
"fact12 -> int1: If that hushpuppy is not non-tuberculate that hushpuppy is not a kind of a madrasa and does not insure gracility.; fact11 -> int2: If this subsidizer is not a Graminaceae the thing is not an allograph and the thing is not fossorial.;"
] | 8 | 1 | null | 6 | 0 | 6 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: This sulfonate is a Graminaceae and does not engrave if it does not baby. fact2: If this subsidizer is not a kind of an allograph then this wiper is a kind of a Opuntia or she/he rules doped or both. fact3: the gracility insures wiper. fact4: This subsidizer is not a Graminaceae if this sulfonate is a Graminaceae and does not engrave. fact5: Something that is not a Graminaceae is not an allograph and is not fossorial. fact6: Something is not a madrasa and does not insure gracility if the thing is tuberculate. fact7: This wiper insures gracility. ; $hypothesis$ = That hushpuppy is not a madrasa. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That porcineness does not happens. | ¬{A} | fact1: That the Marking does not happens is caused by that the protestant does not occurs and the impropriety does not happens. fact2: The fact that this recessing does not happens if the fact that that pyramid does not occurs and this recessing happens is wrong hold. fact3: The fact that that liberalisation does not occurs and this amoebanness happens is incorrect if this lowballing extolment does not happens. fact4: If the fact that that liberalisation does not occurs but this amoebanness happens does not hold this amoebanness does not happens. fact5: That that postmortalness happens hold. fact6: This guaranteeing Hodgkin happens. fact7: Both this summarising and that porcineness happens if that shriveling Astana does not occurs. fact8: If this guaranteeing Hodgkin and that vulvectomy occurs then this fisticuffs does not occurs. fact9: If this fisticuffs does not occurs then that woodwork and the hemostasis happens. fact10: This summarising occurs if that porcineness occurs. fact11: The indemnification occurs. fact12: That iambicness does not happens if that this nationalness occurs and/or that trephination occurs does not hold. fact13: This summarising does not occurs if that both that shriveling Astana and this summarising occurs is not true. fact14: The fact that this nationalness or that trephination or both occurs is false if the compering revisionism does not occurs. fact15: That that coup does not happens and the multilateralness does not happens is brought about by that this recessing does not occurs. fact16: That woodwork leads to that this lowballing extolment does not happens and this congregationalness does not happens. fact17: That notthat pyramid but this recessing occurs does not hold if this amoebanness does not happens. fact18: If that the fact that that shriveling Astana occurs but that tubalness does not happens is false hold then that shriveling Astana does not occurs. fact19: That lasting Zoarcidae occurs if that catechesis occurs. fact20: The protestant does not occurs and the impropriety does not occurs if that coup does not happens. fact21: If the Marking does not occurs then the compering revisionism does not occurs and this circumvolving does not occurs. fact22: The fact that both that shriveling Astana and this non-tubalness happens is wrong if that iambicness does not occurs. fact23: The fact that both that shriveling Astana and this summarising happens does not hold. | fact1: (¬{L} & ¬{K}) -> ¬{J} fact2: ¬(¬{P} & {O}) -> ¬{O} fact3: ¬{R} -> ¬(¬{S} & {Q}) fact4: ¬(¬{S} & {Q}) -> ¬{Q} fact5: {IC} fact6: {AD} fact7: ¬{C} -> ({B} & {A}) fact8: ({AD} & {AC}) -> ¬{AB} fact9: ¬{AB} -> ({U} & {AA}) fact10: {A} -> {B} fact11: {CD} fact12: ¬({F} v {G}) -> ¬{E} fact13: ¬({C} & {B}) -> ¬{B} fact14: ¬{H} -> ¬({F} v {G}) fact15: ¬{O} -> (¬{M} & ¬{N}) fact16: {U} -> (¬{R} & ¬{T}) fact17: ¬{Q} -> ¬(¬{P} & {O}) fact18: ¬({C} & ¬{D}) -> ¬{C} fact19: {FU} -> {FS} fact20: ¬{M} -> (¬{L} & ¬{K}) fact21: ¬{J} -> (¬{H} & ¬{I}) fact22: ¬{E} -> ¬({C} & ¬{D}) fact23: ¬({C} & {B}) | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that that porcineness occurs.; fact10 & assump1 -> int1: This summarising occurs.; fact13 & fact23 -> int2: This summarising does not occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"void -> assump1: {A}; fact10 & assump1 -> int1: {B}; fact13 & fact23 -> int2: ¬{B}; int1 & int2 -> int3: #F#; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | Let's assume that that porcineness occurs. | {A} | [] | 22 | 3 | 3 | 20 | 0 | 20 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That the Marking does not happens is caused by that the protestant does not occurs and the impropriety does not happens. fact2: The fact that this recessing does not happens if the fact that that pyramid does not occurs and this recessing happens is wrong hold. fact3: The fact that that liberalisation does not occurs and this amoebanness happens is incorrect if this lowballing extolment does not happens. fact4: If the fact that that liberalisation does not occurs but this amoebanness happens does not hold this amoebanness does not happens. fact5: That that postmortalness happens hold. fact6: This guaranteeing Hodgkin happens. fact7: Both this summarising and that porcineness happens if that shriveling Astana does not occurs. fact8: If this guaranteeing Hodgkin and that vulvectomy occurs then this fisticuffs does not occurs. fact9: If this fisticuffs does not occurs then that woodwork and the hemostasis happens. fact10: This summarising occurs if that porcineness occurs. fact11: The indemnification occurs. fact12: That iambicness does not happens if that this nationalness occurs and/or that trephination occurs does not hold. fact13: This summarising does not occurs if that both that shriveling Astana and this summarising occurs is not true. fact14: The fact that this nationalness or that trephination or both occurs is false if the compering revisionism does not occurs. fact15: That that coup does not happens and the multilateralness does not happens is brought about by that this recessing does not occurs. fact16: That woodwork leads to that this lowballing extolment does not happens and this congregationalness does not happens. fact17: That notthat pyramid but this recessing occurs does not hold if this amoebanness does not happens. fact18: If that the fact that that shriveling Astana occurs but that tubalness does not happens is false hold then that shriveling Astana does not occurs. fact19: That lasting Zoarcidae occurs if that catechesis occurs. fact20: The protestant does not occurs and the impropriety does not occurs if that coup does not happens. fact21: If the Marking does not occurs then the compering revisionism does not occurs and this circumvolving does not occurs. fact22: The fact that both that shriveling Astana and this non-tubalness happens is wrong if that iambicness does not occurs. fact23: The fact that both that shriveling Astana and this summarising happens does not hold. ; $hypothesis$ = That porcineness does not happens. ; $proof$ = | void -> assump1: Let's assume that that porcineness occurs.; fact10 & assump1 -> int1: This summarising occurs.; fact13 & fact23 -> int2: This summarising does not occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That utility does not occurs. | ¬{C} | fact1: That utility is prevented by that that sketching happens and that aggravating Vireonidae happens. fact2: That this fencing happens hold. fact3: That aggravating Vireonidae occurs. fact4: The upmarketness and this absorbing addicted happens. fact5: That sketching happens. fact6: That makeup happens. fact7: That summarising NRO does not occurs if the tapping happens and the forefending Geometridae occurs. fact8: The executing does not occurs. fact9: The upbraiding angiohemophilia happens. fact10: The fact that the mining does not happens is not wrong. fact11: That the perpetration and that symptomaticness occurs prevents this unconscientiousness. fact12: The equalization happens. fact13: That sketching occurs and that utility happens if that aggravating Vireonidae does not occurs. fact14: That the pegging Zechariah occurs and the amperage happens triggers that this reprieve does not happens. fact15: That that vagalness and the annexalness occurs prevents the Lens. fact16: That refutation happens. | fact1: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} fact2: {IJ} fact3: {B} fact4: ({ET} & {DH}) fact5: {A} fact6: {AK} fact7: ({IL} & {HP}) -> ¬{IU} fact8: ¬{IO} fact9: {FF} fact10: ¬{FQ} fact11: ({GS} & {DG}) -> ¬{K} fact12: {HC} fact13: ¬{B} -> ({A} & {C}) fact14: ({CN} & {IF}) -> ¬{BA} fact15: ({GK} & {IP}) -> ¬{IH} fact16: {ES} | [
"fact5 & fact3 -> int1: Both that sketching and that aggravating Vireonidae occurs.; int1 & fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact5 & fact3 -> int1: ({A} & {B}); int1 & fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | That utility occurs. | {C} | [] | 6 | 2 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 13 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That utility is prevented by that that sketching happens and that aggravating Vireonidae happens. fact2: That this fencing happens hold. fact3: That aggravating Vireonidae occurs. fact4: The upmarketness and this absorbing addicted happens. fact5: That sketching happens. fact6: That makeup happens. fact7: That summarising NRO does not occurs if the tapping happens and the forefending Geometridae occurs. fact8: The executing does not occurs. fact9: The upbraiding angiohemophilia happens. fact10: The fact that the mining does not happens is not wrong. fact11: That the perpetration and that symptomaticness occurs prevents this unconscientiousness. fact12: The equalization happens. fact13: That sketching occurs and that utility happens if that aggravating Vireonidae does not occurs. fact14: That the pegging Zechariah occurs and the amperage happens triggers that this reprieve does not happens. fact15: That that vagalness and the annexalness occurs prevents the Lens. fact16: That refutation happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That utility does not occurs. ; $proof$ = | fact5 & fact3 -> int1: Both that sketching and that aggravating Vireonidae occurs.; int1 & fact1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | This amyloid is not Yugoslav. | ¬{C}{a} | fact1: Somebody is Yugoslav if the fact that it is not Yugoslav and is a kind of a slopped is false. fact2: Some man is non-Yugoslav if that person does expunge breathlessness. fact3: This amyloid expunges breathlessness if this propanamide does not expunges breathlessness. fact4: If the fact that this propanamide is an overestimate and/or it is a Marquand is incorrect then this amyloid does not expunge breathlessness. fact5: This propanamide does not clank Kleist if the fact that this propanamide is not telemetered but it does clank Kleist is not true. fact6: This amyloid is sociobiologic and/or this person is a qurush. fact7: That something is not Yugoslav and is a kind of a slopped does not hold if it does not expunge breathlessness. fact8: This amyloid is not Yugoslav if this amyloid expunges breathlessness. fact9: That this propanamide is non-telemetered and clanks Kleist is wrong if this propanamide is not a dialog. fact10: If this amyloid expunges breathlessness that frieze expunges breathlessness. fact11: If this mytilid is both not a Athanasianism and not a Marquand then this propanamide is not a kind of an overestimate. fact12: If that this amyloid intromits Acaridae and is not powerless does not hold this amyloid is a slopped. fact13: That either somebody is an overestimate or he/she is a Marquand or both does not hold if he/she is not a Athanasianism. fact14: The fact that this amyloid intromits Acaridae but it is not powerless is false. fact15: If some person does not clank Kleist then that it is not a lingo and it is gynaecological does not hold. fact16: The fact that the fact that this propanamide is not Yugoslav and he is not a slopped is false hold if that he is not an overestimate hold. fact17: Something that either expunges breathlessness or is a slopped or both is non-Yugoslav. fact18: If this amyloid does not intromit Acaridae then this amyloid is a slopped. fact19: Some man is not a Athanasianism if the fact that it is not a lingo and it is gynaecological does not hold. | fact1: (x): ¬(¬{C}x & {B}x) -> {C}x fact2: (x): {A}x -> ¬{C}x fact3: ¬{A}{b} -> {A}{a} fact4: ¬({D}{b} v {E}{b}) -> ¬{A}{a} fact5: ¬(¬{K}{b} & {I}{b}) -> ¬{I}{b} fact6: ({AO}{a} v {DR}{a}) fact7: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{C}x & {B}x) fact8: {A}{a} -> ¬{C}{a} fact9: ¬{J}{b} -> ¬(¬{K}{b} & {I}{b}) fact10: {A}{a} -> {A}{al} fact11: (¬{F}{c} & ¬{E}{c}) -> ¬{D}{b} fact12: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} fact13: (x): ¬{F}x -> ¬({D}x v {E}x) fact14: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact15: (x): ¬{I}x -> ¬(¬{H}x & {G}x) fact16: ¬{D}{b} -> ¬(¬{C}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) fact17: (x): ({A}x v {B}x) -> ¬{C}x fact18: ¬{AA}{a} -> {B}{a} fact19: (x): ¬(¬{H}x & {G}x) -> ¬{F}x | [
"fact12 & fact14 -> int1: This amyloid is a slopped.; int1 -> int2: This amyloid expunges breathlessness and/or the thing is a slopped.; fact17 -> int3: If this amyloid does expunge breathlessness and/or is a kind of a slopped then this amyloid is non-Yugoslav.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact12 & fact14 -> int1: {B}{a}; int1 -> int2: ({A}{a} v {B}{a}); fact17 -> int3: ({A}{a} v {B}{a}) -> ¬{C}{a}; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | This amyloid is Yugoslav. | {C}{a} | [
"fact27 -> int4: This amyloid is Yugoslav if the fact that this amyloid is a kind of Yugoslav a slopped is incorrect.; fact22 -> int5: The fact that this amyloid is not Yugoslav and is a slopped is incorrect if it does not expunge breathlessness.; fact26 -> int6: If this propanamide is not a Athanasianism then that this propanamide is an overestimate and/or is a Marquand does not hold.; fact25 -> int7: This propanamide is not a Athanasianism if the fact that it is both not a lingo and gynaecological does not hold.; fact23 -> int8: The fact that this propanamide is both not a lingo and gynaecological is wrong if this propanamide does not clank Kleist.;"
] | 8 | 3 | 3 | 16 | 0 | 16 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Somebody is Yugoslav if the fact that it is not Yugoslav and is a kind of a slopped is false. fact2: Some man is non-Yugoslav if that person does expunge breathlessness. fact3: This amyloid expunges breathlessness if this propanamide does not expunges breathlessness. fact4: If the fact that this propanamide is an overestimate and/or it is a Marquand is incorrect then this amyloid does not expunge breathlessness. fact5: This propanamide does not clank Kleist if the fact that this propanamide is not telemetered but it does clank Kleist is not true. fact6: This amyloid is sociobiologic and/or this person is a qurush. fact7: That something is not Yugoslav and is a kind of a slopped does not hold if it does not expunge breathlessness. fact8: This amyloid is not Yugoslav if this amyloid expunges breathlessness. fact9: That this propanamide is non-telemetered and clanks Kleist is wrong if this propanamide is not a dialog. fact10: If this amyloid expunges breathlessness that frieze expunges breathlessness. fact11: If this mytilid is both not a Athanasianism and not a Marquand then this propanamide is not a kind of an overestimate. fact12: If that this amyloid intromits Acaridae and is not powerless does not hold this amyloid is a slopped. fact13: That either somebody is an overestimate or he/she is a Marquand or both does not hold if he/she is not a Athanasianism. fact14: The fact that this amyloid intromits Acaridae but it is not powerless is false. fact15: If some person does not clank Kleist then that it is not a lingo and it is gynaecological does not hold. fact16: The fact that the fact that this propanamide is not Yugoslav and he is not a slopped is false hold if that he is not an overestimate hold. fact17: Something that either expunges breathlessness or is a slopped or both is non-Yugoslav. fact18: If this amyloid does not intromit Acaridae then this amyloid is a slopped. fact19: Some man is not a Athanasianism if the fact that it is not a lingo and it is gynaecological does not hold. ; $hypothesis$ = This amyloid is not Yugoslav. ; $proof$ = | fact12 & fact14 -> int1: This amyloid is a slopped.; int1 -> int2: This amyloid expunges breathlessness and/or the thing is a slopped.; fact17 -> int3: If this amyloid does expunge breathlessness and/or is a kind of a slopped then this amyloid is non-Yugoslav.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | The fact that Stacey is a Turkmen and is not divalent does not hold. | ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) | fact1: The fact that someone is a Turkmen but it is not divalent does not hold if it is a shrewishness. fact2: Stacey is not divalent. fact3: That television is both a droop and not a Turkmen. | fact1: (x): {A}x -> ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact2: ¬{AB}{a} fact3: ({HH}{f} & ¬{AA}{f}) | [] | [] | The fact that Stacey is a Turkmen and is not divalent does not hold. | ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) | [
"fact4 -> int1: The fact that Stacey is a Turkmen but he/she is not divalent is false if that he/she is a kind of a shrewishness is right.;"
] | 5 | 1 | null | 3 | 0 | 3 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: The fact that someone is a Turkmen but it is not divalent does not hold if it is a shrewishness. fact2: Stacey is not divalent. fact3: That television is both a droop and not a Turkmen. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that Stacey is a Turkmen and is not divalent does not hold. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That that warrior is a Cryptogramma and a revolting is incorrect. | ¬({B}{a} & {A}{a}) | fact1: Some man is not a Mokulu if it naturalises hyperopia. fact2: If this millboard iodinateds then that warrior is a kind of a Werfel. fact3: If that warrior is a kind of a Cryptogramma then that this haematopoiesis is both not non-euphonious and a revolting is incorrect. fact4: The fact that this haematopoiesis is both a Salvadora and thalloid is false. fact5: If this trogon is not a Mokulu that this trogon is not a Salvadora and/or it is a kind of a phon is incorrect. fact6: The fact that this trogon is not thalloid but it is a Salvadora does not hold. fact7: The fact that that warrior is a kind of a Cryptogramma and is not non-euphonious is incorrect. fact8: That warrior is a Werfel if that this millboard is fathomable hold. fact9: If there exists some person such that it is fathomable this millboard iodinateds and/or it is fathomable. fact10: This haematopoiesis is not euphonious if it is a Salvadora. fact11: That someone is a Cryptogramma is right if the fact that this person is araneidal but not a sown is false. fact12: This trogon is a Salvadora. fact13: If that warrior is not a Cryptogramma then the fact that this haematopoiesis is a Cryptogramma and she is a revolting is not correct. fact14: Somebody is not a Cryptogramma if that she is not euphonious but thalloid does not hold. fact15: If this haematopoiesis is not a kind of a Cryptogramma then the fact that that warrior is a Cryptogramma that is a revolting is false. fact16: This trogon is a kind of a Cryptogramma. fact17: Some person is not a Cryptogramma if the fact that the one is euphonious is not wrong. fact18: That hardheads is fathomable. fact19: Something is not a revolting if that it is non-euphonious and thalloid does not hold. fact20: That something is araneidal but not a sown is wrong if the thing is a Werfel. | fact1: (x): {K}x -> ¬{J}x fact2: {H}{c} -> {G}{a} fact3: {B}{a} -> ¬({AA}{aa} & {A}{aa}) fact4: ¬({C}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) fact5: ¬{J}{b} -> ¬(¬{C}{b} v {D}{b}) fact6: ¬(¬{AB}{b} & {C}{b}) fact7: ¬({B}{a} & {AA}{a}) fact8: {I}{c} -> {G}{a} fact9: (x): {I}x -> ({H}{c} v {I}{c}) fact10: {C}{aa} -> ¬{AA}{aa} fact11: (x): ¬({E}x & ¬{F}x) -> {B}x fact12: {C}{b} fact13: ¬{B}{a} -> ¬({B}{aa} & {A}{aa}) fact14: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x fact15: ¬{B}{aa} -> ¬({B}{a} & {A}{a}) fact16: {B}{b} fact17: (x): {AA}x -> ¬{B}x fact18: {I}{d} fact19: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{A}x fact20: (x): {G}x -> ¬({E}x & ¬{F}x) | [
"fact14 -> int1: This haematopoiesis is not a Cryptogramma if the fact that that thing is non-euphonious thing that is thalloid does not hold.;"
] | [
"fact14 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa};"
] | That that warrior is a Cryptogramma that is a revolting hold. | ({B}{a} & {A}{a}) | [
"fact21 -> int2: If the fact that that warrior is araneidal thing that is not a sown is false then that warrior is a Cryptogramma.; fact22 -> int3: The fact that that warrior is araneidal but she is not a sown is incorrect if that warrior is a Werfel.; fact23 -> int4: Some person is not unfathomable.; int4 & fact28 -> int5: Either this millboard iodinateds or it is fathomable or both.; int5 & fact24 & fact26 -> int6: That warrior is a Werfel.; int3 & int6 -> int7: The fact that that warrior is araneidal but not a sown is wrong.; int2 & int7 -> int8: That warrior is a Cryptogramma.; fact27 -> int9: This trogon is not a Mokulu if this trogon naturalises hyperopia.;"
] | 6 | 3 | null | 17 | 0 | 17 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Some man is not a Mokulu if it naturalises hyperopia. fact2: If this millboard iodinateds then that warrior is a kind of a Werfel. fact3: If that warrior is a kind of a Cryptogramma then that this haematopoiesis is both not non-euphonious and a revolting is incorrect. fact4: The fact that this haematopoiesis is both a Salvadora and thalloid is false. fact5: If this trogon is not a Mokulu that this trogon is not a Salvadora and/or it is a kind of a phon is incorrect. fact6: The fact that this trogon is not thalloid but it is a Salvadora does not hold. fact7: The fact that that warrior is a kind of a Cryptogramma and is not non-euphonious is incorrect. fact8: That warrior is a Werfel if that this millboard is fathomable hold. fact9: If there exists some person such that it is fathomable this millboard iodinateds and/or it is fathomable. fact10: This haematopoiesis is not euphonious if it is a Salvadora. fact11: That someone is a Cryptogramma is right if the fact that this person is araneidal but not a sown is false. fact12: This trogon is a Salvadora. fact13: If that warrior is not a Cryptogramma then the fact that this haematopoiesis is a Cryptogramma and she is a revolting is not correct. fact14: Somebody is not a Cryptogramma if that she is not euphonious but thalloid does not hold. fact15: If this haematopoiesis is not a kind of a Cryptogramma then the fact that that warrior is a Cryptogramma that is a revolting is false. fact16: This trogon is a kind of a Cryptogramma. fact17: Some person is not a Cryptogramma if the fact that the one is euphonious is not wrong. fact18: That hardheads is fathomable. fact19: Something is not a revolting if that it is non-euphonious and thalloid does not hold. fact20: That something is araneidal but not a sown is wrong if the thing is a Werfel. ; $hypothesis$ = That that warrior is a Cryptogramma and a revolting is incorrect. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That Aristotelean is not a kind of a arteriectasis. | ¬{B}{aa} | fact1: That that smack is a kind of a arteriectasis hold. fact2: Somebody that is not a firmware and misquotes is a arteriectasis. fact3: That Aristotelean is a arteriectasis if this is a firmware and misquotes. fact4: That Aristotelean is dimmed. fact5: That Aristotelean is not a firmware. fact6: Someone is a arteriectasis if that person is a kind of a firmware and that person misquotes. fact7: This tumbrel is not a arteriectasis if Marshall is not dimmed. fact8: If that that Aristotelean is dimmed hold then that thing is not a firmware and misquotes. fact9: This Nuprin is a kind of a arteriectasis. fact10: If Marshall is a Sanskrit then it is not dimmed. fact11: The fact that if this tumbrel is a arteriectasis that Aristotelean is not a arteriectasis is right. fact12: If that Aristotelean is dimmed this one is not a firmware. | fact1: {B}{ga} fact2: (x): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x fact3: ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} fact4: {A}{aa} fact5: ¬{AA}{aa} fact6: (x): ({AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x fact7: ¬{A}{b} -> ¬{B}{a} fact8: {A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) fact9: {B}{i} fact10: {C}{b} -> ¬{A}{b} fact11: {B}{a} -> ¬{B}{aa} fact12: {A}{aa} -> ¬{AA}{aa} | [
"fact2 -> int1: That Aristotelean is a arteriectasis if it is not a firmware and it does misquote.; fact4 & fact8 -> int2: That Aristotelean is not a firmware and misquotes.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact2 -> int1: (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa}; fact4 & fact8 -> int2: (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}); int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | That Aristotelean is not a kind of a arteriectasis. | ¬{B}{aa} | [] | 7 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 9 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That that smack is a kind of a arteriectasis hold. fact2: Somebody that is not a firmware and misquotes is a arteriectasis. fact3: That Aristotelean is a arteriectasis if this is a firmware and misquotes. fact4: That Aristotelean is dimmed. fact5: That Aristotelean is not a firmware. fact6: Someone is a arteriectasis if that person is a kind of a firmware and that person misquotes. fact7: This tumbrel is not a arteriectasis if Marshall is not dimmed. fact8: If that that Aristotelean is dimmed hold then that thing is not a firmware and misquotes. fact9: This Nuprin is a kind of a arteriectasis. fact10: If Marshall is a Sanskrit then it is not dimmed. fact11: The fact that if this tumbrel is a arteriectasis that Aristotelean is not a arteriectasis is right. fact12: If that Aristotelean is dimmed this one is not a firmware. ; $hypothesis$ = That Aristotelean is not a kind of a arteriectasis. ; $proof$ = | fact2 -> int1: That Aristotelean is a arteriectasis if it is not a firmware and it does misquote.; fact4 & fact8 -> int2: That Aristotelean is not a firmware and misquotes.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That southernwood is a EdD. | {D}{b} | fact1: That marlberry pilfers. fact2: That southernwood savours Bernoulli. fact3: If this laticifer is exogenous then the fact that this laticifer does not plan Hindostani but it is a kind of a pension is incorrect. fact4: If the escapist pilfers the escapist is a Victorian. fact5: A non-thalamocortical thing that does bag is non-acrocentric. fact6: If somebody pilfers then it is a EdD. fact7: If that marlberry pilfers that southernwood is a worshipped. fact8: If someone is not unaccustomed then that that one impoverishes experienced and flirts neutered is false. fact9: Some man is a EdD if she/he is acrocentric. fact10: If some man does not flirt neutered it is not thalamocortical and bags. fact11: Something is acrocentric if the thing is a worshipped. fact12: Something is not unaccustomed if that it does placard Irula and it is not unaccustomed does not hold. fact13: The fact that that marlberry does not flirt neutered is right if that that rescuer impoverishes experienced and flirt neutered does not hold. fact14: If this genipa is not a Pediculidae and/or it is a kind of a cert then that klebsiella is not a cert. fact15: That marlberry rumbles Catholicism if it is acrocentric. fact16: That that rescuer does placard Irula and is unaccustomed is not right if that klebsiella is not a kind of a cert. fact17: This laticifer is not a pension if the fact that this laticifer does not plan Hindostani and is a pension is incorrect. fact18: If that that marlberry is not acrocentric hold that southernwood is a worshipped and pilfers. fact19: If someone is a worshipped and it does pilfer it is not a kind of a EdD. fact20: This genipa is not a kind of a Pediculidae or is a cert or both if this laticifer is not a pension. | fact1: {A}{a} fact2: {EH}{b} fact3: {N}{f} -> ¬(¬{O}{f} & {M}{f}) fact4: {A}{ak} -> {AQ}{ak} fact5: (x): (¬{F}x & {E}x) -> ¬{C}x fact6: (x): {A}x -> {D}x fact7: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} fact8: (x): ¬{I}x -> ¬({H}x & {G}x) fact9: (x): {C}x -> {D}x fact10: (x): ¬{G}x -> (¬{F}x & {E}x) fact11: (x): {B}x -> {C}x fact12: (x): ¬({K}x & {I}x) -> ¬{I}x fact13: ¬({H}{c} & {G}{c}) -> ¬{G}{a} fact14: (¬{L}{e} v {J}{e}) -> ¬{J}{d} fact15: {C}{a} -> {DJ}{a} fact16: ¬{J}{d} -> ¬({K}{c} & {I}{c}) fact17: ¬(¬{O}{f} & {M}{f}) -> ¬{M}{f} fact18: ¬{C}{a} -> ({B}{b} & {A}{b}) fact19: (x): ({B}x & {A}x) -> ¬{D}x fact20: ¬{M}{f} -> (¬{L}{e} v {J}{e}) | [
"fact7 & fact1 -> int1: That southernwood is a worshipped.; fact11 -> int2: That southernwood is acrocentric if it is a worshipped.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That that southernwood is acrocentric is true.; fact9 -> int4: That southernwood is a EdD if this is acrocentric.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact7 & fact1 -> int1: {B}{b}; fact11 -> int2: {B}{b} -> {C}{b}; int1 & int2 -> int3: {C}{b}; fact9 -> int4: {C}{b} -> {D}{b}; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] | That southernwood is not a EdD. | ¬{D}{b} | [
"fact24 -> int5: If that southernwood is a worshipped and pilfers it is not a EdD.; fact26 -> int6: That marlberry is non-acrocentric if it is non-thalamocortical man that bags.; fact29 -> int7: That marlberry is not thalamocortical and bags if that marlberry does not flirt neutered.; fact30 -> int8: If that rescuer is not unaccustomed that that this person impoverishes experienced and this person flirts neutered is right is incorrect.; fact23 -> int9: If that that rescuer placards Irula and the person is unaccustomed is false then that rescuer is unaccustomed.;"
] | 12 | 3 | 3 | 16 | 0 | 16 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That marlberry pilfers. fact2: That southernwood savours Bernoulli. fact3: If this laticifer is exogenous then the fact that this laticifer does not plan Hindostani but it is a kind of a pension is incorrect. fact4: If the escapist pilfers the escapist is a Victorian. fact5: A non-thalamocortical thing that does bag is non-acrocentric. fact6: If somebody pilfers then it is a EdD. fact7: If that marlberry pilfers that southernwood is a worshipped. fact8: If someone is not unaccustomed then that that one impoverishes experienced and flirts neutered is false. fact9: Some man is a EdD if she/he is acrocentric. fact10: If some man does not flirt neutered it is not thalamocortical and bags. fact11: Something is acrocentric if the thing is a worshipped. fact12: Something is not unaccustomed if that it does placard Irula and it is not unaccustomed does not hold. fact13: The fact that that marlberry does not flirt neutered is right if that that rescuer impoverishes experienced and flirt neutered does not hold. fact14: If this genipa is not a Pediculidae and/or it is a kind of a cert then that klebsiella is not a cert. fact15: That marlberry rumbles Catholicism if it is acrocentric. fact16: That that rescuer does placard Irula and is unaccustomed is not right if that klebsiella is not a kind of a cert. fact17: This laticifer is not a pension if the fact that this laticifer does not plan Hindostani and is a pension is incorrect. fact18: If that that marlberry is not acrocentric hold that southernwood is a worshipped and pilfers. fact19: If someone is a worshipped and it does pilfer it is not a kind of a EdD. fact20: This genipa is not a kind of a Pediculidae or is a cert or both if this laticifer is not a pension. ; $hypothesis$ = That southernwood is a EdD. ; $proof$ = | fact7 & fact1 -> int1: That southernwood is a worshipped.; fact11 -> int2: That southernwood is acrocentric if it is a worshipped.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That that southernwood is acrocentric is true.; fact9 -> int4: That southernwood is a EdD if this is acrocentric.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | The haughtiness occurs. | {A} | fact1: The haughtiness occurs. | fact1: {A} | [
"fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: The haughtiness occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = The haughtiness occurs. ; $proof$ = | fact1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That Hampshire is a prematurity. | {B}{aa} | fact1: Some man is not a prematurity and is not a tetragon if that it is diatomic is right. fact2: If that Hampshire is not radiological then that one is not a histology and does not compound aristocracy. fact3: If some man is not a tetragon the fact that he/she is not radiological and does not energise vinegarishness hold. fact4: That Hampshire does not energise vinegarishness if he is not a kind of a tetragon. fact5: If that Hampshire is non-radiological and it does not energise vinegarishness it is not a kind of a prematurity. fact6: The groundling is not a fermata and does not deck Sussex. fact7: Something is diatomic and/or that thing is a practiced if that thing is non-pectoral. | fact1: (x): {C}x -> (¬{B}x & ¬{A}x) fact2: ¬{AA}{aa} -> (¬{IQ}{aa} & ¬{GS}{aa}) fact3: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact4: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬{AB}{aa} fact5: (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} fact6: (¬{FN}{hg} & ¬{AT}{hg}) fact7: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({C}x v {D}x) | [
"fact3 -> int1: If the fact that that Hampshire is not a tetragon is right then it is a kind of non-radiological thing that does not energise vinegarishness.;"
] | [
"fact3 -> int1: ¬{A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa});"
] | That shovel is not a prematurity. | ¬{B}{aj} | [
"fact8 -> int2: If that shovel is diatomic it is not a prematurity and it is not a tetragon.; fact9 -> int3: This lemonade is diatomic and/or it is a kind of a practiced if it is not pectoral.;"
] | 5 | 3 | null | 5 | 0 | 5 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Some man is not a prematurity and is not a tetragon if that it is diatomic is right. fact2: If that Hampshire is not radiological then that one is not a histology and does not compound aristocracy. fact3: If some man is not a tetragon the fact that he/she is not radiological and does not energise vinegarishness hold. fact4: That Hampshire does not energise vinegarishness if he is not a kind of a tetragon. fact5: If that Hampshire is non-radiological and it does not energise vinegarishness it is not a kind of a prematurity. fact6: The groundling is not a fermata and does not deck Sussex. fact7: Something is diatomic and/or that thing is a practiced if that thing is non-pectoral. ; $hypothesis$ = That Hampshire is a prematurity. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | The fact that everybody is alliaceous is wrong. | ¬((x): {A}x) | fact1: Everything is tearful. fact2: Every man is a gage. fact3: Everybody blusters basis. fact4: Somebody does minimize Elaeocarpaceae but it is not alliaceous if it does not osculate disrespect. fact5: Everything is bisectional. fact6: Every person is nighest. fact7: If the fact that that something is a tablespoonful and it lifts dented is not incorrect is incorrect it does not lifts dented. fact8: Everybody splinters MSB. fact9: That everybody is both not a admass and scarce hold. fact10: Everything is not non-uniformed. fact11: Everything is a cablegram. fact12: Everything throws Verona. fact13: If somebody does not lift dented that one does not osculate disrespect. fact14: Everything is immobile. fact15: Everything is alliaceous. fact16: The fact that everything depicts ambage is right. fact17: Everybody is a Cotinus. fact18: Everything is bisontine. fact19: If somebody is not preclinical the fact that it is a kind of a tablespoonful and it lifts dented does not hold. fact20: Something is both a Othello and alliaceous if the thing does not osculate disrespect. | fact1: (x): {HQ}x fact2: (x): {HT}x fact3: (x): {EK}x fact4: (x): ¬{B}x -> ({DG}x & ¬{A}x) fact5: (x): {CJ}x fact6: (x): {FO}x fact7: (x): ¬({D}x & {C}x) -> ¬{C}x fact8: (x): {GA}x fact9: (x): (¬{G}x & {H}x) fact10: (x): {F}x fact11: (x): {HO}x fact12: (x): {IT}x fact13: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬{B}x fact14: (x): {FE}x fact15: (x): {A}x fact16: (x): {DC}x fact17: (x): {II}x fact18: (x): {O}x fact19: (x): ¬{E}x -> ¬({D}x & {C}x) fact20: (x): ¬{B}x -> ({FF}x & {A}x) | [
"fact15 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact15 -> hypothesis;"
] | Everything does minimize Elaeocarpaceae. | (x): {DG}x | [
"fact23 -> int1: If that Shay does not osculate disrespect is correct then it minimizes Elaeocarpaceae and is not alliaceous.; fact25 -> int2: If Shay does not lift dented the fact that Shay does not osculate disrespect is true.; fact22 -> int3: Shay does not lift dented if that Shay is a tablespoonful and she/he lift dented does not hold.; fact21 -> int4: If Shay is not preclinical the fact that it is a tablespoonful and lifts dented is wrong.; fact24 -> int5: Shay is both not a admass and not non-scarce.; int5 -> int6: Shay is not a kind of a admass.;"
] | 10 | 1 | 0 | 19 | 0 | 19 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Everything is tearful. fact2: Every man is a gage. fact3: Everybody blusters basis. fact4: Somebody does minimize Elaeocarpaceae but it is not alliaceous if it does not osculate disrespect. fact5: Everything is bisectional. fact6: Every person is nighest. fact7: If the fact that that something is a tablespoonful and it lifts dented is not incorrect is incorrect it does not lifts dented. fact8: Everybody splinters MSB. fact9: That everybody is both not a admass and scarce hold. fact10: Everything is not non-uniformed. fact11: Everything is a cablegram. fact12: Everything throws Verona. fact13: If somebody does not lift dented that one does not osculate disrespect. fact14: Everything is immobile. fact15: Everything is alliaceous. fact16: The fact that everything depicts ambage is right. fact17: Everybody is a Cotinus. fact18: Everything is bisontine. fact19: If somebody is not preclinical the fact that it is a kind of a tablespoonful and it lifts dented does not hold. fact20: Something is both a Othello and alliaceous if the thing does not osculate disrespect. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that everybody is alliaceous is wrong. ; $proof$ = | fact15 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | The fact that that decumary is a Hemiprocnidae and that person is a kind of a helpfulness does not hold. | ¬({A}{a} & {B}{a}) | fact1: Some man is not a helpfulness if that this person foreordains Coccidae and/or this person bedaubs counterfactuality is incorrect. fact2: If that someone is nonruminant and it does engage Ningishzida does not hold then it is not a merriness. fact3: If that blasphemer is a dybbuk then this twaddler is a Psilotaceae but this person is not a Olfersia. fact4: The scleroprotein is a Hemiprocnidae and it dissonates if there exists something such that it is not a helpfulness. fact5: Some person does not bedaub counterfactuality if he/she does foreordain Coccidae. fact6: That decumary is a helpfulness. fact7: That decumary is a merriness if that that adopter does not engage Ningishzida and is nonruminant is wrong. fact8: If some man does not bedaub counterfactuality then that it is a kind of a Hemiprocnidae and it is a helpfulness is incorrect. fact9: If this twaddler is a Psilotaceae that is not a Olfersia then that that adopter is a kind of a Psilotaceae is correct. fact10: The fact that that adopter does not engage Ningishzida and is nonruminant is not right if the fact that this person is a Psilotaceae is true. fact11: If something is a kind of a merriness it does foreordain Coccidae. fact12: That protein is a helpfulness. fact13: There exists nothing such that this is a kind of nonruminant thing that does engage Ningishzida. | fact1: (x): ¬({D}x v {C}x) -> ¬{B}x fact2: (x): ¬({F}x & {G}x) -> ¬{E}x fact3: {I}{d} -> ({H}{c} & ¬{J}{c}) fact4: (x): ¬{B}x -> ({A}{di} & {GI}{di}) fact5: (x): {D}x -> ¬{C}x fact6: {B}{a} fact7: ¬(¬{G}{b} & {F}{b}) -> {E}{a} fact8: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬({A}x & {B}x) fact9: ({H}{c} & ¬{J}{c}) -> {H}{b} fact10: {H}{b} -> ¬(¬{G}{b} & {F}{b}) fact11: (x): {E}x -> {D}x fact12: {B}{bj} fact13: (x): ¬({F}x & {G}x) | [] | [] | The fact that that decumary is a Hemiprocnidae and that person is a kind of a helpfulness does not hold. | ¬({A}{a} & {B}{a}) | [
"fact16 -> int1: The fact that that decumary is a kind of a Hemiprocnidae and is a helpfulness does not hold if it does not bedaub counterfactuality.; fact15 -> int2: If that decumary foreordains Coccidae he does not bedaub counterfactuality.; fact19 -> int3: The fact that if that decumary is a kind of a merriness then that that decumary foreordains Coccidae is not false is true.;"
] | 9 | 1 | null | 12 | 0 | 12 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Some man is not a helpfulness if that this person foreordains Coccidae and/or this person bedaubs counterfactuality is incorrect. fact2: If that someone is nonruminant and it does engage Ningishzida does not hold then it is not a merriness. fact3: If that blasphemer is a dybbuk then this twaddler is a Psilotaceae but this person is not a Olfersia. fact4: The scleroprotein is a Hemiprocnidae and it dissonates if there exists something such that it is not a helpfulness. fact5: Some person does not bedaub counterfactuality if he/she does foreordain Coccidae. fact6: That decumary is a helpfulness. fact7: That decumary is a merriness if that that adopter does not engage Ningishzida and is nonruminant is wrong. fact8: If some man does not bedaub counterfactuality then that it is a kind of a Hemiprocnidae and it is a helpfulness is incorrect. fact9: If this twaddler is a Psilotaceae that is not a Olfersia then that that adopter is a kind of a Psilotaceae is correct. fact10: The fact that that adopter does not engage Ningishzida and is nonruminant is not right if the fact that this person is a Psilotaceae is true. fact11: If something is a kind of a merriness it does foreordain Coccidae. fact12: That protein is a helpfulness. fact13: There exists nothing such that this is a kind of nonruminant thing that does engage Ningishzida. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that decumary is a Hemiprocnidae and that person is a kind of a helpfulness does not hold. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | The botch happens. | {A} | fact1: If that dissemination happens then both that blacklisting undecagon and the non-immutableness occurs. fact2: That immunizing Anser happens. fact3: The botch happens. fact4: The non-immutableness leads to that that paining happens and that edutainment happens. fact5: This epidemiologicness does not happens if the fact that this matinee occurs and the praying does not happens is false. fact6: The botch does not occurs and this energising Temnospondyli does not occurs if this epidemiologicness does not occurs. fact7: That this matinee occurs but the praying does not occurs is wrong if that edutainment occurs. | fact1: {J} -> ({I} & ¬{H}) fact2: {AK} fact3: {A} fact4: ¬{H} -> ({G} & {F}) fact5: ¬({D} & ¬{E}) -> ¬{C} fact6: ¬{C} -> (¬{A} & ¬{B}) fact7: {F} -> ¬({D} & ¬{E}) | [
"fact3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact3 -> hypothesis;"
] | The botch does not occurs. | ¬{A} | [] | 10 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If that dissemination happens then both that blacklisting undecagon and the non-immutableness occurs. fact2: That immunizing Anser happens. fact3: The botch happens. fact4: The non-immutableness leads to that that paining happens and that edutainment happens. fact5: This epidemiologicness does not happens if the fact that this matinee occurs and the praying does not happens is false. fact6: The botch does not occurs and this energising Temnospondyli does not occurs if this epidemiologicness does not occurs. fact7: That this matinee occurs but the praying does not occurs is wrong if that edutainment occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = The botch happens. ; $proof$ = | fact3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That fawn is non-coccal. | ¬{C}{a} | fact1: Something hoses Watts if it is Qatari. fact2: If something is a Mishna then it is a perimeter. fact3: If something is not Florentine that it is non-hematopoietic and coccal is not correct. fact4: If that fawn is not a kind of a Clinopodium then that thing is Qatari and is a chart. fact5: Something is not coccal if it is not hematopoietic or is not Florentine or both. fact6: A Florentine thing is coccal. fact7: That fawn is a kind of hematopoietic one that is Florentine. fact8: If that chitterlings is not a Clinopodium that fawn is not a Clinopodium. fact9: Something that hoses Watts is not hematopoietic and/or is non-Florentine. fact10: If that fawn is not coccal then this chordophone is not coccal. fact11: That fawn is hematopoietic. | fact1: (x): {E}x -> {D}x fact2: (x): {CL}x -> {HU}x fact3: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & {C}x) fact4: ¬{G}{a} -> ({E}{a} & {F}{a}) fact5: (x): (¬{A}x v ¬{B}x) -> ¬{C}x fact6: (x): {B}x -> {C}x fact7: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact8: ¬{G}{b} -> ¬{G}{a} fact9: (x): {D}x -> (¬{A}x v ¬{B}x) fact10: ¬{C}{a} -> {C}{ih} fact11: {A}{a} | [
"fact7 -> int1: That fawn is Florentine.; fact6 -> int2: That fawn is coccal if it is Florentine.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact7 -> int1: {B}{a}; fact6 -> int2: {B}{a} -> {C}{a}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | That fawn is non-coccal. | ¬{C}{a} | [
"fact16 -> int3: That fawn is not coccal if either that fawn is not hematopoietic or it is not Florentine or both.; fact14 -> int4: If that fawn hoses Watts that is not hematopoietic and/or is not Florentine.; fact15 -> int5: If that fawn is Qatari the thing hoses Watts.;"
] | 7 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 9 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Something hoses Watts if it is Qatari. fact2: If something is a Mishna then it is a perimeter. fact3: If something is not Florentine that it is non-hematopoietic and coccal is not correct. fact4: If that fawn is not a kind of a Clinopodium then that thing is Qatari and is a chart. fact5: Something is not coccal if it is not hematopoietic or is not Florentine or both. fact6: A Florentine thing is coccal. fact7: That fawn is a kind of hematopoietic one that is Florentine. fact8: If that chitterlings is not a Clinopodium that fawn is not a Clinopodium. fact9: Something that hoses Watts is not hematopoietic and/or is non-Florentine. fact10: If that fawn is not coccal then this chordophone is not coccal. fact11: That fawn is hematopoietic. ; $hypothesis$ = That fawn is non-coccal. ; $proof$ = | fact7 -> int1: That fawn is Florentine.; fact6 -> int2: That fawn is coccal if it is Florentine.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | This robin is megalithic. | {B}{a} | fact1: Something is not megalithic if that it sassings Solanaceae and it is not a popping is wrong. fact2: If the fact that somebody pictures Magicicada and do notwn Gothic is false the person is not serviceable. fact3: If this robin is a popping this robin is non-megalithic. fact4: That the fact that this robin sassings Solanaceae and is a popping does not hold is true if this robin is not aquiferous. fact5: That that this robin does sassing Solanaceae and it is a popping does not hold hold. fact6: This cryptanalyst is not aquiferous. fact7: This robin is not a kind of a Atlantic. fact8: A non-anxiolytic thing is megalithic thing that is aquiferous. fact9: This robin does not oxygenize contrasting. fact10: Something that does not decouple Microstrobos is not anxiolytic but a static. fact11: The fact that that schizanthus is a operand but not aquiferous is incorrect. fact12: Somebody that is a popping is not megalithic. fact13: This robin does not decouple Microstrobos if Antoinette is a Spitzbergen. fact14: This robin is not a wasted. fact15: The Bench does not sassing Solanaceae. fact16: This robin is not aquiferous. | fact1: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x fact2: (x): ¬({CM}x & ¬{GO}x) -> ¬{DH}x fact3: {AB}{a} -> ¬{B}{a} fact4: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact5: ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact6: ¬{A}{ei} fact7: ¬{HC}{a} fact8: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({B}x & {A}x) fact9: ¬{IH}{a} fact10: (x): ¬{E}x -> (¬{C}x & {D}x) fact11: ¬({AQ}{hm} & ¬{A}{hm}) fact12: (x): {AB}x -> ¬{B}x fact13: {F}{b} -> ¬{E}{a} fact14: ¬{EP}{a} fact15: ¬{AA}{dj} fact16: ¬{A}{a} | [
"fact1 -> int1: If that the fact that the fact that this robin sassings Solanaceae and is not a popping is true does not hold is not false she/he is not megalithic.;"
] | [
"fact1 -> int1: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a};"
] | This robin is megalithic. | {B}{a} | [
"fact18 -> int2: This robin is megalithic and he/she is aquiferous if this robin is not anxiolytic.; fact19 -> int3: If the fact that this robin does not decouple Microstrobos hold then that it is not anxiolytic and it is a static hold.;"
] | 6 | 2 | null | 14 | 0 | 14 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Something is not megalithic if that it sassings Solanaceae and it is not a popping is wrong. fact2: If the fact that somebody pictures Magicicada and do notwn Gothic is false the person is not serviceable. fact3: If this robin is a popping this robin is non-megalithic. fact4: That the fact that this robin sassings Solanaceae and is a popping does not hold is true if this robin is not aquiferous. fact5: That that this robin does sassing Solanaceae and it is a popping does not hold hold. fact6: This cryptanalyst is not aquiferous. fact7: This robin is not a kind of a Atlantic. fact8: A non-anxiolytic thing is megalithic thing that is aquiferous. fact9: This robin does not oxygenize contrasting. fact10: Something that does not decouple Microstrobos is not anxiolytic but a static. fact11: The fact that that schizanthus is a operand but not aquiferous is incorrect. fact12: Somebody that is a popping is not megalithic. fact13: This robin does not decouple Microstrobos if Antoinette is a Spitzbergen. fact14: This robin is not a wasted. fact15: The Bench does not sassing Solanaceae. fact16: This robin is not aquiferous. ; $hypothesis$ = This robin is megalithic. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | Let's assume that the fact that this profoundness does not occurs is true. | ¬{A} | fact1: If this profoundness does not occurs that notthat fulfilling but that edifying totalitarianism occurs is wrong. fact2: That edifying totalitarianism happens. fact3: That both this moralness and that focalness occurs is incorrect if this filiating remuda does not occurs. fact4: That fulfilling does not happens. fact5: If the fact that the fact that this moralness and that focalness happens is right does not hold the fact that this profoundness does not happens hold. | fact1: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) fact2: {AB} fact3: ¬{D} -> ¬({C} & {B}) fact4: ¬{AA} fact5: ¬({C} & {B}) -> ¬{A} | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that this profoundness does not occurs is true.; fact1 & assump1 -> int1: The fact that notthat fulfilling but that edifying totalitarianism happens is not right.; fact4 & fact2 -> int2: That fulfilling does not occurs but that edifying totalitarianism happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"void -> assump1: ¬{A}; fact1 & assump1 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}); fact4 & fact2 -> int2: (¬{AA} & {AB}); int1 & int2 -> int3: #F#; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | Let's assume that the fact that this profoundness does not occurs is true. | ¬{A} | [] | 7 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If this profoundness does not occurs that notthat fulfilling but that edifying totalitarianism occurs is wrong. fact2: That edifying totalitarianism happens. fact3: That both this moralness and that focalness occurs is incorrect if this filiating remuda does not occurs. fact4: That fulfilling does not happens. fact5: If the fact that the fact that this moralness and that focalness happens is right does not hold the fact that this profoundness does not happens hold. ; $hypothesis$ = Let's assume that the fact that this profoundness does not occurs is true. ; $proof$ = | void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that this profoundness does not occurs is true.; fact1 & assump1 -> int1: The fact that notthat fulfilling but that edifying totalitarianism happens is not right.; fact4 & fact2 -> int2: That fulfilling does not occurs but that edifying totalitarianism happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That staggerbush is not a kind of a Prosopis and is a bibless. | (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) | fact1: That quadrangle does not scourge Tropaeolaceae and is a kind of a vertebrate. fact2: If that that staggerbush is not a Prosopis but this is a kind of a bibless is not correct that quadrangle is a bronchiolitis. fact3: That staggerbush is not a Prosopis. fact4: That the cosmologist is not a Prosopis is true. fact5: That quadrangle is a bronchiolitis if that that staggerbush is a kind of a Prosopis is correct. fact6: The Archer is not a Prosopis but it is a kind of a Newtonian. fact7: That quadrangle is not a bronchiolitis. fact8: The fact that that staggerbush is not a bronchiolitis and is a bibless is not correct. fact9: That that staggerbush is a Prosopis and she is a bibless does not hold. fact10: That that quadrangle is a bibless is not wrong. fact11: If that quadrangle is not a vertebrate then that that staggerbush is both not a Prosopis and a bibless does not hold. fact12: If that that quadrangle is not a bibless but a Prosopis is wrong then that staggerbush is a bronchiolitis. | fact1: (¬{EP}{b} & {A}{b}) fact2: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} fact3: ¬{AA}{a} fact4: ¬{AA}{k} fact5: {AA}{a} -> {B}{b} fact6: (¬{AA}{cp} & {FP}{cp}) fact7: ¬{B}{b} fact8: ¬(¬{B}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact9: ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact10: {AB}{b} fact11: ¬{A}{b} -> ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact12: ¬(¬{AB}{b} & {AA}{b}) -> {B}{a} | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that that staggerbush is not a Prosopis but this thing is a bibless does not hold.; fact2 & assump1 -> int1: That quadrangle is a kind of a bronchiolitis.; int1 & fact7 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"void -> assump1: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}); fact2 & assump1 -> int1: {B}{b}; int1 & fact7 -> int2: #F#; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | Let's assume that the fact that that staggerbush is not a Prosopis but this thing is a bibless does not hold. | ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) | [] | 4 | 3 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 10 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That quadrangle does not scourge Tropaeolaceae and is a kind of a vertebrate. fact2: If that that staggerbush is not a Prosopis but this is a kind of a bibless is not correct that quadrangle is a bronchiolitis. fact3: That staggerbush is not a Prosopis. fact4: That the cosmologist is not a Prosopis is true. fact5: That quadrangle is a bronchiolitis if that that staggerbush is a kind of a Prosopis is correct. fact6: The Archer is not a Prosopis but it is a kind of a Newtonian. fact7: That quadrangle is not a bronchiolitis. fact8: The fact that that staggerbush is not a bronchiolitis and is a bibless is not correct. fact9: That that staggerbush is a Prosopis and she is a bibless does not hold. fact10: That that quadrangle is a bibless is not wrong. fact11: If that quadrangle is not a vertebrate then that that staggerbush is both not a Prosopis and a bibless does not hold. fact12: If that that quadrangle is not a bibless but a Prosopis is wrong then that staggerbush is a bronchiolitis. ; $hypothesis$ = That staggerbush is not a kind of a Prosopis and is a bibless. ; $proof$ = | void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that that staggerbush is not a Prosopis but this thing is a bibless does not hold.; fact2 & assump1 -> int1: That quadrangle is a kind of a bronchiolitis.; int1 & fact7 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That Doctor does not happens. | ¬{A} | fact1: That longways does not occurs. fact2: That Doctor does not happens. | fact1: ¬{EH} fact2: ¬{A} | [
"fact2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact2 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: That longways does not occurs. fact2: That Doctor does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That Doctor does not happens. ; $proof$ = | fact2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | Everybody is a kind of a gripe. | (x): {A}x | fact1: Every man is a monosemy. fact2: Everything is not non-amalgamative. fact3: Everything dissects amaurosis. fact4: Everybody is a kind of a gripe. fact5: Everything is unfathomable. fact6: Every man luxuriates palilalia. | fact1: (x): {GP}x fact2: (x): {JD}x fact3: (x): {AR}x fact4: (x): {A}x fact5: (x): {FR}x fact6: (x): {FB}x | [
"fact4 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact4 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: Every man is a monosemy. fact2: Everything is not non-amalgamative. fact3: Everything dissects amaurosis. fact4: Everybody is a kind of a gripe. fact5: Everything is unfathomable. fact6: Every man luxuriates palilalia. ; $hypothesis$ = Everybody is a kind of a gripe. ; $proof$ = | fact4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That this anuran is not a Justinian and it does not compose is wrong. | ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) | fact1: This anuran does not compose. fact2: If someone is not a Rostock then she/he mirrors connoisseurship and she/he accommodates Gromyko. fact3: The fact that that timepiece mirrors connoisseurship hold. fact4: If something is either not inalterable or procaryotic or both it is not inalterable. fact5: If that timepiece mirrors connoisseurship then this offstage mirrors connoisseurship. fact6: This anuran dulcorates biosystematy if this offstage does not dulcorates biosystematy but the thing is a Hadrian. fact7: If some man dulcorates biosystematy either it is not inalterable or it is procaryotic or both. fact8: the fact that that connoisseurship mirrors timepiece hold. fact9: The fact that this offstage does not dulcorate biosystematy but it is a Hadrian if this offstage is anorectal is correct. fact10: Something is not a Justinian and it does not compose if it accommodates Gromyko. fact11: If that timepiece is a pentatone this offstage is not a Rostock and this is not Lilliputian. fact12: That timepiece does not proscribe MB. fact13: If that someone is both not a pentatone and Lilliputian is false then it is not a Rostock. fact14: If that timepiece is underarm then this offstage is anorectal. fact15: Something mirrors connoisseurship and/or it accommodates Gromyko if it is not a kind of a Rostock. fact16: The fact that if this anuran is not a kind of a Justinian and it does not compose then this offstage does not mirror connoisseurship is right. fact17: The fact that that gazpacho is both not a pentatone and Lilliputian is wrong if this anuran is not inalterable. fact18: Something that does not proscribe MB is underarm or a hedgefund or both. fact19: The fact that this anuran is not a Justinian but it composes is incorrect. fact20: This offstage does not mirror connoisseurship if that this anuran is not a kind of a Justinian but it does compose hold. | fact1: ¬{AB}{a} fact2: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({B}x & {A}x) fact3: {B}{c} fact4: (x): (¬{F}x v {H}x) -> ¬{F}x fact5: {B}{c} -> {B}{b} fact6: (¬{G}{b} & {J}{b}) -> {G}{a} fact7: (x): {G}x -> (¬{F}x v {H}x) fact8: {AE}{ac} fact9: {I}{b} -> (¬{G}{b} & {J}{b}) fact10: (x): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact11: {E}{c} -> (¬{C}{b} & ¬{D}{b}) fact12: ¬{M}{c} fact13: (x): ¬(¬{E}x & {D}x) -> ¬{C}x fact14: {K}{c} -> {I}{b} fact15: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({B}x v {A}x) fact16: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact17: ¬{F}{a} -> ¬(¬{E}{je} & {D}{je}) fact18: (x): ¬{M}x -> ({K}x v {L}x) fact19: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact20: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that this anuran is not a Justinian and it does not compose.; fact16 & assump1 -> int1: This offstage does not mirror connoisseurship.; fact5 & fact3 -> int2: That this offstage does mirror connoisseurship is true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"void -> assump1: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}); fact16 & assump1 -> int1: ¬{B}{b}; fact5 & fact3 -> int2: {B}{b}; int1 & int2 -> int3: #F#; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | That gazpacho does mirror connoisseurship. | {B}{je} | [
"fact21 -> int4: If that gazpacho is not a Rostock then that gazpacho mirrors connoisseurship and it accommodates Gromyko.; fact30 -> int5: If that that gazpacho is not a kind of a pentatone but it is Lilliputian is incorrect then it is not a Rostock.; fact28 -> int6: This anuran is not inalterable if either it is inalterable or it is procaryotic or both.; fact22 -> int7: This anuran is alterable or procaryotic or both if this anuran does dulcorate biosystematy.; fact25 -> int8: If that timepiece does not proscribe MB then that timepiece is underarm or the thing is a kind of a hedgefund or both.; int8 & fact29 -> int9: That timepiece is underarm and/or it is a hedgefund.;"
] | 11 | 3 | 3 | 17 | 0 | 17 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: This anuran does not compose. fact2: If someone is not a Rostock then she/he mirrors connoisseurship and she/he accommodates Gromyko. fact3: The fact that that timepiece mirrors connoisseurship hold. fact4: If something is either not inalterable or procaryotic or both it is not inalterable. fact5: If that timepiece mirrors connoisseurship then this offstage mirrors connoisseurship. fact6: This anuran dulcorates biosystematy if this offstage does not dulcorates biosystematy but the thing is a Hadrian. fact7: If some man dulcorates biosystematy either it is not inalterable or it is procaryotic or both. fact8: the fact that that connoisseurship mirrors timepiece hold. fact9: The fact that this offstage does not dulcorate biosystematy but it is a Hadrian if this offstage is anorectal is correct. fact10: Something is not a Justinian and it does not compose if it accommodates Gromyko. fact11: If that timepiece is a pentatone this offstage is not a Rostock and this is not Lilliputian. fact12: That timepiece does not proscribe MB. fact13: If that someone is both not a pentatone and Lilliputian is false then it is not a Rostock. fact14: If that timepiece is underarm then this offstage is anorectal. fact15: Something mirrors connoisseurship and/or it accommodates Gromyko if it is not a kind of a Rostock. fact16: The fact that if this anuran is not a kind of a Justinian and it does not compose then this offstage does not mirror connoisseurship is right. fact17: The fact that that gazpacho is both not a pentatone and Lilliputian is wrong if this anuran is not inalterable. fact18: Something that does not proscribe MB is underarm or a hedgefund or both. fact19: The fact that this anuran is not a Justinian but it composes is incorrect. fact20: This offstage does not mirror connoisseurship if that this anuran is not a kind of a Justinian but it does compose hold. ; $hypothesis$ = That this anuran is not a Justinian and it does not compose is wrong. ; $proof$ = | void -> assump1: Let's assume that this anuran is not a Justinian and it does not compose.; fact16 & assump1 -> int1: This offstage does not mirror connoisseurship.; fact5 & fact3 -> int2: That this offstage does mirror connoisseurship is true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | This ascendant is not a lease. | ¬{B}{a} | fact1: This ascendant is not Indonesian but he/she is a fearfulness. fact2: If this ascendant is not a kind of a findings then this sampan is not a findings. fact3: The fact that that ossuary is a kind of bathymetrical a speechlessness is wrong if that ossuary is not a Paleolithic. fact4: If Doris is not a overappraisal this ascendant disenchants readership and rediscovers insubstantiality. fact5: This ascendant is not a lease if she is a kind of Indonesian person that is a fearfulness. fact6: If this ascendant is a kind of non-Indonesian thing that is a kind of a fearfulness this ascendant is not a kind of a lease. fact7: Something that disenchants readership is both not a lease and not a findings. fact8: That ossuary is not a kind of a Paleolithic. fact9: Someone is not Indonesian but it is small if it is not a kind of a findings. fact10: If that ossuary is not a kind of a Episcopalian but it is a overappraisal then Doris is not a kind of a overappraisal. fact11: If the fact that somebody is bathymetrical and is a speechlessness is not right it is not a Episcopalian. | fact1: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact2: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{A}{cf} fact3: ¬{I}{c} -> ¬({F}{c} & {H}{c}) fact4: ¬{E}{b} -> ({C}{a} & {D}{a}) fact5: ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact6: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact7: (x): {C}x -> (¬{B}x & ¬{A}x) fact8: ¬{I}{c} fact9: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x & {IL}x) fact10: (¬{G}{c} & {E}{c}) -> ¬{E}{b} fact11: (x): ¬({F}x & {H}x) -> ¬{G}x | [
"fact6 & fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact6 & fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | This sampan is not Indonesian but the person is small. | (¬{AA}{cf} & {IL}{cf}) | [
"fact19 -> int1: This sampan is not Indonesian but it is small if this sampan is not a kind of a findings.; fact17 -> int2: This ascendant is not a lease and it is not a findings if it disenchants readership.; fact18 -> int3: That ossuary is not a Episcopalian if the fact that that ossuary is both bathymetrical and a speechlessness is incorrect.; fact15 & fact14 -> int4: The fact that that ossuary is bathymetrical and it is a speechlessness does not hold.; int3 & int4 -> int5: That ossuary is not a Episcopalian.;"
] | 10 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 9 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: This ascendant is not Indonesian but he/she is a fearfulness. fact2: If this ascendant is not a kind of a findings then this sampan is not a findings. fact3: The fact that that ossuary is a kind of bathymetrical a speechlessness is wrong if that ossuary is not a Paleolithic. fact4: If Doris is not a overappraisal this ascendant disenchants readership and rediscovers insubstantiality. fact5: This ascendant is not a lease if she is a kind of Indonesian person that is a fearfulness. fact6: If this ascendant is a kind of non-Indonesian thing that is a kind of a fearfulness this ascendant is not a kind of a lease. fact7: Something that disenchants readership is both not a lease and not a findings. fact8: That ossuary is not a kind of a Paleolithic. fact9: Someone is not Indonesian but it is small if it is not a kind of a findings. fact10: If that ossuary is not a kind of a Episcopalian but it is a overappraisal then Doris is not a kind of a overappraisal. fact11: If the fact that somebody is bathymetrical and is a speechlessness is not right it is not a Episcopalian. ; $hypothesis$ = This ascendant is not a lease. ; $proof$ = | fact6 & fact1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | This ratifying Chelifer does not happens. | ¬{B} | fact1: Both that brachyurousness and the paging Serra occurs if that allotropicness does not occurs. fact2: The fact that notthat looting but this achievement happens is not right. fact3: This isomericness does not happens if either that looting does not happens or the blastosphericness occurs or both. fact4: If that that annoyance occurs and this concatenation occurs is not true that allotropicness does not happens. fact5: That that bottomness occurs results in that notthis Ramses but the confabulating happens. fact6: That this despairing occurs and this racing does not happens is brought about by this acetylicness. fact7: That this mastopexy occurs and this schematisation does not occurs is false if this agitating emotion occurs. fact8: That looting does not occurs and/or the blastosphericness occurs. fact9: This schematisation leads to that non-cochlearness and/or that that detoxing does not happens. fact10: If this isomericness does not happens the fact that both that annoyance and this concatenation happens is wrong. fact11: That brachyurousness brings about that notthat travel but this acetylicness occurs. fact12: This schematisation happens if that this mastopexy happens but this schematisation does not occurs is false. fact13: If that notthat looting but this achievement occurs does not hold this ratifying Chelifer does not happens. fact14: That bottomness happens if this despairing occurs. fact15: If the fact that the defiling Physeter does not happens but the confabulating happens is wrong then that stopper does not occurs. fact16: That that looting happens and this achievement happens is wrong. fact17: This ratifying Chelifer does not occurs if that looting occurs. fact18: The loading does not occurs. fact19: If this Ramses does not occurs then both this agitating emotion and that massacring defiled occurs. | fact1: ¬{Q} -> ({O} & {P}) fact2: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) fact3: (¬{AA} v {U}) -> ¬{T} fact4: ¬({R} & {S}) -> ¬{Q} fact5: {J} -> (¬{H} & {I}) fact6: {M} -> ({K} & ¬{L}) fact7: {F} -> ¬({E} & ¬{D}) fact8: (¬{AA} v {U}) fact9: {D} -> (¬{A} v ¬{C}) fact10: ¬{T} -> ¬({R} & {S}) fact11: {O} -> (¬{N} & {M}) fact12: ¬({E} & ¬{D}) -> {D} fact13: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} fact14: {K} -> {J} fact15: ¬(¬{IU} & {I}) -> ¬{GF} fact16: ¬({AA} & {AB}) fact17: {AA} -> ¬{B} fact18: ¬{FQ} fact19: ¬{H} -> ({F} & {G}) | [
"fact13 & fact2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact13 & fact2 -> hypothesis;"
] | The fact that this ratifying Chelifer occurs is true. | {B} | [
"fact22 & fact32 -> int1: This isomericness does not occurs.; fact23 & int1 -> int2: That both that annoyance and this concatenation occurs does not hold.; fact20 & int2 -> int3: That allotropicness does not happens.; fact28 & int3 -> int4: That brachyurousness happens and the paging Serra happens.; int4 -> int5: That brachyurousness occurs.; fact21 & int5 -> int6: The fact that that travel does not happens and this acetylicness occurs hold.; int6 -> int7: This acetylicness occurs.; fact24 & int7 -> int8: This despairing occurs and this racing does not happens.; int8 -> int9: This despairing occurs.; fact25 & int9 -> int10: That bottomness happens.; fact26 & int10 -> int11: This Ramses does not occurs and the confabulating happens.; int11 -> int12: This Ramses does not occurs.; fact30 & int12 -> int13: Both this agitating emotion and that massacring defiled happens.; int13 -> int14: This agitating emotion happens.; fact29 & int14 -> int15: That this mastopexy but notthis schematisation occurs is wrong.; fact31 & int15 -> int16: The fact that this schematisation occurs hold.; fact27 & int16 -> int17: That cochlearness does not occurs or that detoxing does not happens or both.;"
] | 18 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 0 | 17 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Both that brachyurousness and the paging Serra occurs if that allotropicness does not occurs. fact2: The fact that notthat looting but this achievement happens is not right. fact3: This isomericness does not happens if either that looting does not happens or the blastosphericness occurs or both. fact4: If that that annoyance occurs and this concatenation occurs is not true that allotropicness does not happens. fact5: That that bottomness occurs results in that notthis Ramses but the confabulating happens. fact6: That this despairing occurs and this racing does not happens is brought about by this acetylicness. fact7: That this mastopexy occurs and this schematisation does not occurs is false if this agitating emotion occurs. fact8: That looting does not occurs and/or the blastosphericness occurs. fact9: This schematisation leads to that non-cochlearness and/or that that detoxing does not happens. fact10: If this isomericness does not happens the fact that both that annoyance and this concatenation happens is wrong. fact11: That brachyurousness brings about that notthat travel but this acetylicness occurs. fact12: This schematisation happens if that this mastopexy happens but this schematisation does not occurs is false. fact13: If that notthat looting but this achievement occurs does not hold this ratifying Chelifer does not happens. fact14: That bottomness happens if this despairing occurs. fact15: If the fact that the defiling Physeter does not happens but the confabulating happens is wrong then that stopper does not occurs. fact16: That that looting happens and this achievement happens is wrong. fact17: This ratifying Chelifer does not occurs if that looting occurs. fact18: The loading does not occurs. fact19: If this Ramses does not occurs then both this agitating emotion and that massacring defiled occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = This ratifying Chelifer does not happens. ; $proof$ = | fact13 & fact2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That antiviral does not happens. | ¬{C} | fact1: That alarming Astroloma does not occurs if that harmonization happens. fact2: That that extolling Augeas does not happens and the spinelessness does not occurs is caused by that this sprites does not happens. fact3: That that antiviral does not occurs is right if this inshoreness occurs and that extolling Augeas happens. fact4: This sprites does not happens if this advancement does not happens and/or this sprites does not happens. fact5: That both that notarising DBA and this fMRI occurs is wrong if this adamantineness does not occurs. fact6: If that the non-tonalness and that unintegratedness happens does not hold that that unintegratedness does not occurs is true. fact7: That misdemeanour does not occurs if that the meretriciousness occurs or the earthenness occurs or both does not hold. fact8: That that alarming Astroloma does not occurs yields that this unpasteurisedness occurs and that biblicalness happens. fact9: That the unfreeness does not occurs is brought about by that both the overeating and that catheterisation happens. fact10: If this accordantness does not occurs and that hackwork does not occurs then this adamantineness does not occurs. fact11: That antiviral and this inshoreness occurs if the fact that that extolling Augeas does not occurs is right. fact12: The fact that the meretriciousness and/or the earthenness occurs is wrong if that unintegratedness does not occurs. fact13: This fMRI does not occurs if the fact that the fact that that notarising DBA occurs and this fMRI occurs is false is true. fact14: That extolling Augeas happens. fact15: That this advancement does not occurs is caused by that this donating keratoscleritis occurs. fact16: The variety and this donating keratoscleritis happens if that misdemeanour does not happens. fact17: If that baring occurs that harmonization occurs. fact18: The fact that both the non-tonalness and that unintegratedness occurs does not hold if this fMRI does not happens. fact19: If both that happening might and the overeating happens this sousing zeal does not occurs. fact20: That that longing Arabidopsis does not happens leads to that that baring and that carpetbagness occurs. fact21: This inshoreness occurs. fact22: If this unpasteurisedness occurs then this accordantness does not occurs and that hackwork does not occurs. | fact1: {AA} -> ¬{U} fact2: ¬{E} -> (¬{B} & ¬{D}) fact3: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} fact4: (¬{F} v ¬{E}) -> ¬{E} fact5: ¬{P} -> ¬({O} & {M}) fact6: ¬(¬{N} & {L}) -> ¬{L} fact7: ¬({J} v {K}) -> ¬{I} fact8: ¬{U} -> ({S} & {T}) fact9: ({BJ} & {BN}) -> ¬{JJ} fact10: (¬{Q} & ¬{R}) -> ¬{P} fact11: ¬{B} -> ({C} & {A}) fact12: ¬{L} -> ¬({J} v {K}) fact13: ¬({O} & {M}) -> ¬{M} fact14: {B} fact15: {G} -> ¬{F} fact16: ¬{I} -> ({H} & {G}) fact17: {AB} -> {AA} fact18: ¬{M} -> ¬(¬{N} & {L}) fact19: ({AN} & {BJ}) -> ¬{GC} fact20: ¬{AD} -> ({AB} & {AC}) fact21: {A} fact22: {S} -> (¬{Q} & ¬{R}) | [
"fact21 & fact14 -> int1: This inshoreness happens and that extolling Augeas occurs.; int1 & fact3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact21 & fact14 -> int1: ({A} & {B}); int1 & fact3 -> hypothesis;"
] | That antiviral happens. | {C} | [] | 23 | 2 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 19 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That alarming Astroloma does not occurs if that harmonization happens. fact2: That that extolling Augeas does not happens and the spinelessness does not occurs is caused by that this sprites does not happens. fact3: That that antiviral does not occurs is right if this inshoreness occurs and that extolling Augeas happens. fact4: This sprites does not happens if this advancement does not happens and/or this sprites does not happens. fact5: That both that notarising DBA and this fMRI occurs is wrong if this adamantineness does not occurs. fact6: If that the non-tonalness and that unintegratedness happens does not hold that that unintegratedness does not occurs is true. fact7: That misdemeanour does not occurs if that the meretriciousness occurs or the earthenness occurs or both does not hold. fact8: That that alarming Astroloma does not occurs yields that this unpasteurisedness occurs and that biblicalness happens. fact9: That the unfreeness does not occurs is brought about by that both the overeating and that catheterisation happens. fact10: If this accordantness does not occurs and that hackwork does not occurs then this adamantineness does not occurs. fact11: That antiviral and this inshoreness occurs if the fact that that extolling Augeas does not occurs is right. fact12: The fact that the meretriciousness and/or the earthenness occurs is wrong if that unintegratedness does not occurs. fact13: This fMRI does not occurs if the fact that the fact that that notarising DBA occurs and this fMRI occurs is false is true. fact14: That extolling Augeas happens. fact15: That this advancement does not occurs is caused by that this donating keratoscleritis occurs. fact16: The variety and this donating keratoscleritis happens if that misdemeanour does not happens. fact17: If that baring occurs that harmonization occurs. fact18: The fact that both the non-tonalness and that unintegratedness occurs does not hold if this fMRI does not happens. fact19: If both that happening might and the overeating happens this sousing zeal does not occurs. fact20: That that longing Arabidopsis does not happens leads to that that baring and that carpetbagness occurs. fact21: This inshoreness occurs. fact22: If this unpasteurisedness occurs then this accordantness does not occurs and that hackwork does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That antiviral does not happens. ; $proof$ = | fact21 & fact14 -> int1: This inshoreness happens and that extolling Augeas occurs.; int1 & fact3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | The fact that this hurricane happens is true. | {AA} | fact1: That that Salvadoreanness occurs is true. fact2: If this cesarean does not happens then that Salvadoreanness and this hurricane happens. fact3: If that Salvadoreanness occurs then that libation occurs. fact4: That this hurricane does not happens but that libation occurs is caused by that Salvadoreanness. fact5: Notthe fireman but that convertibleness occurs. fact6: The tergiversation does not happens. | fact1: {A} fact2: ¬{B} -> ({A} & {AA}) fact3: {A} -> {AB} fact4: {A} -> (¬{AA} & {AB}) fact5: (¬{O} & {IO}) fact6: ¬{HH} | [
"fact4 & fact1 -> int1: Notthis hurricane but that libation occurs.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact4 & fact1 -> int1: (¬{AA} & {AB}); int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | The fact that this hurricane happens is true. | {AA} | [] | 6 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 4 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That that Salvadoreanness occurs is true. fact2: If this cesarean does not happens then that Salvadoreanness and this hurricane happens. fact3: If that Salvadoreanness occurs then that libation occurs. fact4: That this hurricane does not happens but that libation occurs is caused by that Salvadoreanness. fact5: Notthe fireman but that convertibleness occurs. fact6: The tergiversation does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that this hurricane happens is true. ; $proof$ = | fact4 & fact1 -> int1: Notthis hurricane but that libation occurs.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That gravel is not crannied. | {B}{aa} | fact1: That trajectory is not a Amen. fact2: If the fact that that trajectory is not a concerned but bulbar is incorrect then that figure is actinomorphic. fact3: The fact that that trajectory is not a concerned but bulbar does not hold if that trajectory is not a Amen. fact4: There is nothing that is not a kind of a Heteromeles and is not a kind of a trot. fact5: If some person is not a scuffle it is a smugness and it is a Konoe. fact6: Someone is a scuffle and not a Green if that person does not worry stephead. fact7: That the fact that that gravel is a Heteromeles and not a trot is right is false. fact8: If some man is spermous then the fact that this person does not thread Momotidae and this person does not consecrate is incorrect. fact9: If something is a kind of a Heteromeles it is uncrannied. fact10: That if that somebody is not a Heteromeles and the one is not a trot is incorrect then the one is uncrannied hold. fact11: The fact that some man is not uncrannied and does coquette Chickamauga is wrong if the one is a smugness. fact12: There exists nothing such that it is not a brushed and is not a cachexy. fact13: That gravel is not uncrannied if that that recording does not coquette Chickamauga and is spermous is wrong. fact14: If some person rejects lysinemia he does not worry stephead. fact15: The cog is spermous if the fact that that recording is not uncrannied but she coquettes Chickamauga is false. fact16: That gravel is uncrannied if it is a Heteromeles. fact17: If some man is actinomorphic it is not non-transcendental. fact18: If the fact that that gravel is not a kind of a Heteroscelus and it does not gormandise does not hold then that gravel is uncrannied. fact19: If there is something such that that thing is transcendental then Gina sees ragtime and rejects lysinemia. fact20: The fact that that recording is not a scuffle hold if Gina is a scuffle and not a Green. fact21: There exists nothing that is a Heteromeles that is not a trot. | fact1: ¬{O}{d} fact2: ¬(¬{M}{d} & {N}{d}) -> {L}{c} fact3: ¬{O}{d} -> ¬(¬{M}{d} & {N}{d}) fact4: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact5: (x): ¬{F}x -> ({D}x & {E}x) fact6: (x): ¬{G}x -> ({F}x & ¬{H}x) fact7: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) fact8: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{HU}x & ¬{BK}x) fact9: (x): {AA}x -> {B}x fact10: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x fact11: (x): {D}x -> ¬(¬{B}x & {C}x) fact12: (x): ¬(¬{ES}x & ¬{HJ}x) fact13: ¬(¬{C}{a} & {A}{a}) -> ¬{B}{aa} fact14: (x): {I}x -> ¬{G}x fact15: ¬(¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}) -> {A}{gi} fact16: {AA}{aa} -> {B}{aa} fact17: (x): {L}x -> {K}x fact18: ¬(¬{HP}{aa} & ¬{FH}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} fact19: (x): {K}x -> ({J}{b} & {I}{b}) fact20: ({F}{b} & ¬{H}{b}) -> ¬{F}{a} fact21: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) | [
"fact10 -> int1: If that that gravel is not a Heteromeles and is not a kind of a trot is wrong then that gravel is uncrannied.; fact4 -> int2: That that gravel is not a Heteromeles and is not a kind of a trot is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact10 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa}; fact4 -> int2: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}); int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | That gravel is not uncrannied. | ¬{B}{aa} | [] | 5 | 2 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 19 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That trajectory is not a Amen. fact2: If the fact that that trajectory is not a concerned but bulbar is incorrect then that figure is actinomorphic. fact3: The fact that that trajectory is not a concerned but bulbar does not hold if that trajectory is not a Amen. fact4: There is nothing that is not a kind of a Heteromeles and is not a kind of a trot. fact5: If some person is not a scuffle it is a smugness and it is a Konoe. fact6: Someone is a scuffle and not a Green if that person does not worry stephead. fact7: That the fact that that gravel is a Heteromeles and not a trot is right is false. fact8: If some man is spermous then the fact that this person does not thread Momotidae and this person does not consecrate is incorrect. fact9: If something is a kind of a Heteromeles it is uncrannied. fact10: That if that somebody is not a Heteromeles and the one is not a trot is incorrect then the one is uncrannied hold. fact11: The fact that some man is not uncrannied and does coquette Chickamauga is wrong if the one is a smugness. fact12: There exists nothing such that it is not a brushed and is not a cachexy. fact13: That gravel is not uncrannied if that that recording does not coquette Chickamauga and is spermous is wrong. fact14: If some person rejects lysinemia he does not worry stephead. fact15: The cog is spermous if the fact that that recording is not uncrannied but she coquettes Chickamauga is false. fact16: That gravel is uncrannied if it is a Heteromeles. fact17: If some man is actinomorphic it is not non-transcendental. fact18: If the fact that that gravel is not a kind of a Heteroscelus and it does not gormandise does not hold then that gravel is uncrannied. fact19: If there is something such that that thing is transcendental then Gina sees ragtime and rejects lysinemia. fact20: The fact that that recording is not a scuffle hold if Gina is a scuffle and not a Green. fact21: There exists nothing that is a Heteromeles that is not a trot. ; $hypothesis$ = That gravel is not crannied. ; $proof$ = | fact10 -> int1: If that that gravel is not a Heteromeles and is not a kind of a trot is wrong then that gravel is uncrannied.; fact4 -> int2: That that gravel is not a Heteromeles and is not a kind of a trot is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That salt is not asterismal. | ¬{C}{a} | fact1: If something that is not a serviceableness is not a persuasiveness that pinky is a Rhizopogonaceae. fact2: That wheatear is a persuasiveness. fact3: That resolvent is a persuasiveness. fact4: If some person that is asterismal is not a Harrisia then it is a acrocephaly. fact5: The fact that that salt robs but it is not a persuasiveness does not hold. fact6: Something that is not a serviceableness is a kind of asterismal thing that is a persuasiveness. fact7: If that wheatear is both not a serviceableness and not a Harrisia then that salt is not a serviceableness. fact8: That salt is both not a Rhizopogonaceae and a shambles. fact9: If the fact that that wheatear robs and is a serviceableness hold then that salt is not a kind of a serviceableness. fact10: That guan is not a serviceableness if that crammer is a Harrisia but that one is not a snit. fact11: That salt is a kind of a shambles. fact12: Somebody is not a alexic but it is a panchayet. fact13: That salt is a serviceableness if that is not a Rhizopogonaceae and is a shambles. fact14: If something is a alexic then that does rob and that is not a snit. fact15: The fact that that salt robs and it is a persuasiveness does not hold. fact16: If that guan does rob but that thing is not a kind of a snit then that that wheatear is not a serviceableness is correct. fact17: That salt is a kind of a persuasiveness if the fact that that salt robs but he/she is not a persuasiveness is incorrect. fact18: If some man is a serviceableness and a persuasiveness that one is not asterismal. fact19: That if this cowhouse is not a alexic then that crammer is a kind of a Harrisia but it is not a snit is right. | fact1: (x): (¬{B}x & ¬{A}x) -> {AA}{gj} fact2: {A}{b} fact3: {A}{dc} fact4: (x): ({C}x & ¬{D}x) -> {BR}x fact5: ¬({E}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) fact6: (x): ¬{B}x -> ({C}x & {A}x) fact7: (¬{B}{b} & ¬{D}{b}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact8: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact9: ({E}{b} & {B}{b}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact10: ({D}{d} & ¬{F}{d}) -> ¬{B}{c} fact11: {AB}{a} fact12: (Ex): (¬{G}x & {I}x) fact13: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} fact14: (x): {G}x -> ({E}x & ¬{F}x) fact15: ¬({E}{a} & {A}{a}) fact16: ({E}{c} & ¬{F}{c}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact17: ¬({E}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) -> {A}{a} fact18: (x): ({B}x & {A}x) -> ¬{C}x fact19: ¬{G}{e} -> ({D}{d} & ¬{F}{d}) | [
"fact13 & fact8 -> int1: That salt is a serviceableness.; fact5 & fact17 -> int2: That salt is a persuasiveness.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That salt is a serviceableness that is a kind of a persuasiveness.; fact18 -> int4: That salt is not asterismal if this thing is a serviceableness and a persuasiveness.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact13 & fact8 -> int1: {B}{a}; fact5 & fact17 -> int2: {A}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ({B}{a} & {A}{a}); fact18 -> int4: ({B}{a} & {A}{a}) -> ¬{C}{a}; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] | That pinky is a Rhizopogonaceae and it is a acrocephaly. | ({AA}{gj} & {BR}{gj}) | [
"fact21 -> int5: Someone is a persuasiveness.; fact22 -> int6: If that pinky is a kind of asterismal thing that is not a Harrisia that pinky is a acrocephaly.;"
] | 5 | 3 | 3 | 14 | 0 | 14 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If something that is not a serviceableness is not a persuasiveness that pinky is a Rhizopogonaceae. fact2: That wheatear is a persuasiveness. fact3: That resolvent is a persuasiveness. fact4: If some person that is asterismal is not a Harrisia then it is a acrocephaly. fact5: The fact that that salt robs but it is not a persuasiveness does not hold. fact6: Something that is not a serviceableness is a kind of asterismal thing that is a persuasiveness. fact7: If that wheatear is both not a serviceableness and not a Harrisia then that salt is not a serviceableness. fact8: That salt is both not a Rhizopogonaceae and a shambles. fact9: If the fact that that wheatear robs and is a serviceableness hold then that salt is not a kind of a serviceableness. fact10: That guan is not a serviceableness if that crammer is a Harrisia but that one is not a snit. fact11: That salt is a kind of a shambles. fact12: Somebody is not a alexic but it is a panchayet. fact13: That salt is a serviceableness if that is not a Rhizopogonaceae and is a shambles. fact14: If something is a alexic then that does rob and that is not a snit. fact15: The fact that that salt robs and it is a persuasiveness does not hold. fact16: If that guan does rob but that thing is not a kind of a snit then that that wheatear is not a serviceableness is correct. fact17: That salt is a kind of a persuasiveness if the fact that that salt robs but he/she is not a persuasiveness is incorrect. fact18: If some man is a serviceableness and a persuasiveness that one is not asterismal. fact19: That if this cowhouse is not a alexic then that crammer is a kind of a Harrisia but it is not a snit is right. ; $hypothesis$ = That salt is not asterismal. ; $proof$ = | fact13 & fact8 -> int1: That salt is a serviceableness.; fact5 & fact17 -> int2: That salt is a persuasiveness.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That salt is a serviceableness that is a kind of a persuasiveness.; fact18 -> int4: That salt is not asterismal if this thing is a serviceableness and a persuasiveness.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That this n does not smolder data hold. | ¬{A}{a} | fact1: If the fact that this pneumococcus does not shilling but it smolders data is incorrect this n does smolders data. fact2: That this n blinks and is not a Hedera is false. fact3: Someone is a Hedera but the person is not a Thespesia if the person is an employable. | fact1: ¬(¬{B}{b} & {A}{b}) -> {A}{a} fact2: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact3: (x): {P}x -> ({AB}x & ¬{HF}x) | [] | [] | That ailanthus is a Hedera but it is not a Thespesia if that ailanthus is an employable. | {P}{ch} -> ({AB}{ch} & ¬{HF}{ch}) | [
"fact4 -> hypothesis;"
] | 1 | 3 | null | 2 | 0 | 2 | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | $facts$ = fact1: If the fact that this pneumococcus does not shilling but it smolders data is incorrect this n does smolders data. fact2: That this n blinks and is not a Hedera is false. fact3: Someone is a Hedera but the person is not a Thespesia if the person is an employable. ; $hypothesis$ = That this n does not smolder data hold. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That this forgery does not proposition anorthography hold. | ¬{B}{b} | fact1: That bettong is a lacking. fact2: If that bettong verbalizes brownness then this forgery does not proposition anorthography. fact3: The fact that that bettong does verbalize brownness but he/she does not proposition anorthography does not hold if the fact that he/she is a lacking hold. fact4: That the fact that that bettong is a kind of a Tayassu that does not verbalize brownness is wrong if that bettong is a kind of a lacking hold. fact5: That the microgliacyte narrates Diapensiaceae and this thing contrasts EMG is wrong. | fact1: {A}{a} fact2: {AB}{a} -> ¬{B}{b} fact3: {A}{a} -> ¬({AB}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) fact4: {A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact5: ¬({FG}{n} & {E}{n}) | [
"fact4 & fact1 -> int1: The fact that that bettong is a Tayassu but it does not verbalize brownness is false.;"
] | [
"fact4 & fact1 -> int1: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a});"
] | null | null | [] | null | 2 | null | 3 | 0 | 3 | UNKNOWN | null | UNKNOWN | null | $facts$ = fact1: That bettong is a lacking. fact2: If that bettong verbalizes brownness then this forgery does not proposition anorthography. fact3: The fact that that bettong does verbalize brownness but he/she does not proposition anorthography does not hold if the fact that he/she is a lacking hold. fact4: That the fact that that bettong is a kind of a Tayassu that does not verbalize brownness is wrong if that bettong is a kind of a lacking hold. fact5: That the microgliacyte narrates Diapensiaceae and this thing contrasts EMG is wrong. ; $hypothesis$ = That this forgery does not proposition anorthography hold. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | This mistaking consensus does not occurs and this socializing Dubya does not happens. | (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) | fact1: If that this mistaking consensus occurs and that Somaliness happens is not true this mistaking consensus does not occurs. fact2: This electing equality happens. fact3: That this sprinkling does not occurs and/or this synchronousness prevents that inexpensiveness. fact4: If this scouting Adiantum occurs the fact that that this mistaking consensus does not occurs and this socializing Dubya does not occurs does not hold is right. fact5: That the freckle happens is prevented by that both that neuter and this electing equality occurs. fact6: Both that neuter and the tearing midafternoon occurs. fact7: If that Somaliness occurs then notthis bond but that browsing happens. fact8: This sprinkling does not happens or this synchronousness happens or both if the fact that that meaning snoopy happens hold. fact9: That this bond does not occurs leads to that that tripos and this scouting Adiantum occurs. fact10: If that this socializing Dubya and this scouting Adiantum occurs is wrong then this socializing Dubya does not happens. fact11: If that that inexpensiveness does not happens is correct this bond does not occurs and that browsing does not happens. fact12: That this mistaking consensus occurs and that Somaliness happens does not hold if that confiding Bangalore does not occurs. fact13: If this bond does not occurs then the fact that this socializing Dubya occurs and this scouting Adiantum happens does not hold. fact14: That that splitsville does not happens results in that the whelping frangibleness happens and that meaning snoopy happens. fact15: If the fact that that Somaliness does not occurs and this synchronousness does not occurs is incorrect then that Somaliness occurs. fact16: If the freckle does not happens that confiding Bangalore does not happens and the commitment happens. | fact1: ¬({AA} & {D}) -> ¬{AA} fact2: {M} fact3: (¬{G} v {F}) -> ¬{E} fact4: {A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) fact5: ({N} & {M}) -> ¬{L} fact6: ({N} & {Q}) fact7: {D} -> (¬{B} & {C}) fact8: {H} -> (¬{G} v {F}) fact9: ¬{B} -> ({GA} & {A}) fact10: ¬({AB} & {A}) -> ¬{AB} fact11: ¬{E} -> (¬{B} & ¬{C}) fact12: ¬{J} -> ¬({AA} & {D}) fact13: ¬{B} -> ¬({AB} & {A}) fact14: ¬{O} -> ({I} & {H}) fact15: ¬(¬{D} & ¬{F}) -> {D} fact16: ¬{L} -> (¬{J} & {K}) | [] | [] | This mistaking consensus does not occurs and this socializing Dubya does not happens. | (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) | [
"fact17 -> int1: That neuter happens.; int1 & fact21 -> int2: That neuter occurs and this electing equality occurs.; fact26 & int2 -> int3: The freckle does not happens.; fact23 & int3 -> int4: That confiding Bangalore does not happens but the commitment happens.; int4 -> int5: That confiding Bangalore does not happens.; fact25 & int5 -> int6: The fact that this mistaking consensus happens and that Somaliness occurs is wrong.; fact20 & int6 -> int7: This mistaking consensus does not occurs.;"
] | 10 | 1 | null | 15 | 0 | 15 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If that this mistaking consensus occurs and that Somaliness happens is not true this mistaking consensus does not occurs. fact2: This electing equality happens. fact3: That this sprinkling does not occurs and/or this synchronousness prevents that inexpensiveness. fact4: If this scouting Adiantum occurs the fact that that this mistaking consensus does not occurs and this socializing Dubya does not occurs does not hold is right. fact5: That the freckle happens is prevented by that both that neuter and this electing equality occurs. fact6: Both that neuter and the tearing midafternoon occurs. fact7: If that Somaliness occurs then notthis bond but that browsing happens. fact8: This sprinkling does not happens or this synchronousness happens or both if the fact that that meaning snoopy happens hold. fact9: That this bond does not occurs leads to that that tripos and this scouting Adiantum occurs. fact10: If that this socializing Dubya and this scouting Adiantum occurs is wrong then this socializing Dubya does not happens. fact11: If that that inexpensiveness does not happens is correct this bond does not occurs and that browsing does not happens. fact12: That this mistaking consensus occurs and that Somaliness happens does not hold if that confiding Bangalore does not occurs. fact13: If this bond does not occurs then the fact that this socializing Dubya occurs and this scouting Adiantum happens does not hold. fact14: That that splitsville does not happens results in that the whelping frangibleness happens and that meaning snoopy happens. fact15: If the fact that that Somaliness does not occurs and this synchronousness does not occurs is incorrect then that Somaliness occurs. fact16: If the freckle does not happens that confiding Bangalore does not happens and the commitment happens. ; $hypothesis$ = This mistaking consensus does not occurs and this socializing Dubya does not happens. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | The tailing Asin happens. | {B} | fact1: This refractiveness does not occurs and this counterbombardment happens if that bragging does not happens. fact2: That bragging does not happens. fact3: This refractiveness is prevented by that that bragging does not happens. fact4: This refractiveness does not happens. fact5: That notthis refractiveness but this counterbombardment happens prevents that the tailing Asin does not occurs. fact6: That this refractiveness occurs and this counterbombardment happens prevents that the tailing Asin does not occurs. | fact1: ¬{A} -> (¬{AA} & {AB}) fact2: ¬{A} fact3: ¬{A} -> ¬{AA} fact4: ¬{AA} fact5: (¬{AA} & {AB}) -> {B} fact6: ({AA} & {AB}) -> {B} | [
"fact1 & fact2 -> int1: This refractiveness does not happens and this counterbombardment occurs.; int1 & fact5 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact1 & fact2 -> int1: (¬{AA} & {AB}); int1 & fact5 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 3 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: This refractiveness does not occurs and this counterbombardment happens if that bragging does not happens. fact2: That bragging does not happens. fact3: This refractiveness is prevented by that that bragging does not happens. fact4: This refractiveness does not happens. fact5: That notthis refractiveness but this counterbombardment happens prevents that the tailing Asin does not occurs. fact6: That this refractiveness occurs and this counterbombardment happens prevents that the tailing Asin does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = The tailing Asin happens. ; $proof$ = | fact1 & fact2 -> int1: This refractiveness does not happens and this counterbombardment occurs.; int1 & fact5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That this neve is not a malady and is not a Markova is incorrect. | ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) | fact1: If someone does vaporize it is not a kind of a Markova and is not pteridological. fact2: This neve is a spirits if it towels loaded and it does not contain reject. fact3: Some man is not a kind of a frail and it does not degrade acorea if it is a spirits. fact4: This neve towels loaded and does not contain reject. fact5: If someone does not degrade acorea then she converts Labrouste and vaporizes. fact6: This neve is not a malady and is not a Markova. | fact1: (x): {A}x -> (¬{AB}x & ¬{IT}x) fact2: ({G}{a} & ¬{F}{a}) -> {D}{a} fact3: (x): {D}x -> (¬{E}x & ¬{C}x) fact4: ({G}{a} & ¬{F}{a}) fact5: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({B}x & {A}x) fact6: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) | [
"fact6 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact6 -> hypothesis;"
] | This disparager is not a Markova and is not pteridological. | (¬{AB}{aq} & ¬{IT}{aq}) | [
"fact11 -> int1: If this disparager vaporizes then this disparager is not a Markova and is not pteridological.; fact10 -> int2: This disparager converts Labrouste and does vaporize if that one does not degrade acorea.; fact7 -> int3: This neve is not a frail and does not degrade acorea if this neve is a spirits.; fact8 & fact9 -> int4: This neve is a kind of a spirits.; int3 & int4 -> int5: This neve is not a frail and this one does not degrade acorea.; int5 -> int6: There exists something such that the thing is not a frail and the thing does not degrade acorea.;"
] | 7 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If someone does vaporize it is not a kind of a Markova and is not pteridological. fact2: This neve is a spirits if it towels loaded and it does not contain reject. fact3: Some man is not a kind of a frail and it does not degrade acorea if it is a spirits. fact4: This neve towels loaded and does not contain reject. fact5: If someone does not degrade acorea then she converts Labrouste and vaporizes. fact6: This neve is not a malady and is not a Markova. ; $hypothesis$ = That this neve is not a malady and is not a Markova is incorrect. ; $proof$ = | fact6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | This formalizing radicalism does not occurs and that simmering happens. | (¬{B} & {A}) | fact1: That simmering happens if this supervision occurs. fact2: This formalizing radicalism does not occurs if the fact that this plaining and this rimming Anubis occurs is incorrect. fact3: This supervision occurs. fact4: That both this plaining and this rimming Anubis occurs is incorrect. | fact1: {C} -> {A} fact2: ¬({AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} fact3: {C} fact4: ¬({AA} & {AB}) | [
"fact2 & fact4 -> int1: This formalizing radicalism does not occurs.; fact1 & fact3 -> int2: That simmering happens.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact2 & fact4 -> int1: ¬{B}; fact1 & fact3 -> int2: {A}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: That simmering happens if this supervision occurs. fact2: This formalizing radicalism does not occurs if the fact that this plaining and this rimming Anubis occurs is incorrect. fact3: This supervision occurs. fact4: That both this plaining and this rimming Anubis occurs is incorrect. ; $hypothesis$ = This formalizing radicalism does not occurs and that simmering happens. ; $proof$ = | fact2 & fact4 -> int1: This formalizing radicalism does not occurs.; fact1 & fact3 -> int2: That simmering happens.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | This Inquisitor is not providential. | ¬{A}{a} | fact1: That consuetudinary countermines if Daniella countermines. fact2: The fact that this Inquisitor is not a dimmer and is not a rigging if this Inquisitor is a Kore is right. fact3: If this Inquisitor does not plunder the fact that that wiggler is both a dimmer and providential hold. fact4: Something spumes Canterbury and it is thyroidal if it is not a kind of a holism. fact5: If something countermines it is a Kore. fact6: If this airgun is cervical then this crosstie is non-Swiss. fact7: That that consuetudinary is a dimmer but this one is not providential does not hold. fact8: Some person is providential person that plunders if the fact that it is not a dimmer hold. fact9: That this Inquisitor is providential but it is not a dimmer is incorrect. fact10: If the fact that that consuetudinary countermines hold the fact that this Inquisitor is not a rigging and is a Kore is wrong. fact11: The fact that that consuetudinary plunders but it is not a dimmer is false. fact12: Daniella countermines if this crosstie is not Swiss. fact13: If this Inquisitor is providential then that consuetudinary plunders. fact14: If something that is cervical is not Swiss it does countermine. fact15: If the fact that something is not a rigging but it is a Kore is incorrect then it does not plunder. fact16: This Inquisitor is a dimmer. fact17: This airgun is not a holism. fact18: If this airgun spumes Canterbury then this airgun is not a Heimdallr. fact19: If someone is not a Heimdallr then this one is not non-cervical and implicates Neckar. fact20: This gosling is providential. fact21: If the fact that the fact that that consuetudinary plunders but it is not a kind of a dimmer is true is not true that consuetudinary does not plunders. | fact1: {F}{c} -> {F}{b} fact2: {E}{a} -> (¬{C}{a} & ¬{D}{a}) fact3: ¬{B}{a} -> ({C}{ch} & {A}{ch}) fact4: (x): ¬{M}x -> ({K}x & {L}x) fact5: (x): {F}x -> {E}x fact6: {H}{e} -> ¬{G}{d} fact7: ¬({C}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) fact8: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x & {B}x) fact9: ¬({A}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) fact10: {F}{b} -> ¬(¬{D}{a} & {E}{a}) fact11: ¬({B}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) fact12: ¬{G}{d} -> {F}{c} fact13: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} fact14: (x): ({H}x & ¬{G}x) -> {F}x fact15: (x): ¬(¬{D}x & {E}x) -> ¬{B}x fact16: {C}{a} fact17: ¬{M}{e} fact18: {K}{e} -> ¬{J}{e} fact19: (x): ¬{J}x -> ({H}x & {I}x) fact20: {A}{bt} fact21: ¬({B}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) -> ¬{B}{b} | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that this Inquisitor is providential.; fact13 & assump1 -> int1: That consuetudinary plunders.; fact11 & fact21 -> int2: That consuetudinary does not plunder.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"void -> assump1: {A}{a}; fact13 & assump1 -> int1: {B}{b}; fact11 & fact21 -> int2: ¬{B}{b}; int1 & int2 -> int3: #F#; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | That wiggler is a dimmer. | {C}{ch} | [
"fact24 -> int4: This Inquisitor does not plunder if the fact that this Inquisitor is not a rigging and is a Kore is incorrect.; fact27 -> int5: If this airgun is not a Heimdallr then this airgun is cervical and implicates Neckar.; fact28 -> int6: This airgun spumes Canterbury and is thyroidal if this airgun is not a kind of a holism.; int6 & fact23 -> int7: This airgun spumes Canterbury and it is thyroidal.; int7 -> int8: This airgun spumes Canterbury.; fact25 & int8 -> int9: This airgun is not a Heimdallr.; int5 & int9 -> int10: This airgun is not non-cervical and it implicates Neckar.; int10 -> int11: This airgun is cervical.; fact30 & int11 -> int12: This crosstie is not Swiss.; fact29 & int12 -> int13: Daniella countermines.; fact22 & int13 -> int14: That consuetudinary countermines.; fact31 & int14 -> int15: That this Inquisitor is not a rigging and is a Kore is incorrect.; int4 & int15 -> int16: This Inquisitor does not plunder.; fact26 & int16 -> int17: That wiggler is a dimmer and providential.; int17 -> hypothesis;"
] | 13 | 3 | 3 | 18 | 0 | 18 | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | $facts$ = fact1: That consuetudinary countermines if Daniella countermines. fact2: The fact that this Inquisitor is not a dimmer and is not a rigging if this Inquisitor is a Kore is right. fact3: If this Inquisitor does not plunder the fact that that wiggler is both a dimmer and providential hold. fact4: Something spumes Canterbury and it is thyroidal if it is not a kind of a holism. fact5: If something countermines it is a Kore. fact6: If this airgun is cervical then this crosstie is non-Swiss. fact7: That that consuetudinary is a dimmer but this one is not providential does not hold. fact8: Some person is providential person that plunders if the fact that it is not a dimmer hold. fact9: That this Inquisitor is providential but it is not a dimmer is incorrect. fact10: If the fact that that consuetudinary countermines hold the fact that this Inquisitor is not a rigging and is a Kore is wrong. fact11: The fact that that consuetudinary plunders but it is not a dimmer is false. fact12: Daniella countermines if this crosstie is not Swiss. fact13: If this Inquisitor is providential then that consuetudinary plunders. fact14: If something that is cervical is not Swiss it does countermine. fact15: If the fact that something is not a rigging but it is a Kore is incorrect then it does not plunder. fact16: This Inquisitor is a dimmer. fact17: This airgun is not a holism. fact18: If this airgun spumes Canterbury then this airgun is not a Heimdallr. fact19: If someone is not a Heimdallr then this one is not non-cervical and implicates Neckar. fact20: This gosling is providential. fact21: If the fact that the fact that that consuetudinary plunders but it is not a kind of a dimmer is true is not true that consuetudinary does not plunders. ; $hypothesis$ = This Inquisitor is not providential. ; $proof$ = | void -> assump1: Let's assume that this Inquisitor is providential.; fact13 & assump1 -> int1: That consuetudinary plunders.; fact11 & fact21 -> int2: That consuetudinary does not plunder.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | This ministerialness does not happens. | ¬{C} | fact1: Notthis jubilation but that Eucharist happens if the ones occurs. fact2: That arousal does not happens if the fact that this astounding does not occurs or the Vienneseness happens or both is wrong. fact3: This blastemicness occurs if this ticktacktoo happens. fact4: This chromatographicalness occurs. fact5: That that capitalist does not happens and/or this chromatographicalness happens is false if this blastemicness occurs. fact6: If that arousal does not happens then that hypodermicness does not happens and this blighting hyphen does not occurs. fact7: This easiness does not occurs and the carbonating talking does not happens if this jubilation does not occurs. fact8: If that that capitalist does not happens and/or this chromatographicalness happens is wrong then this ministerialness does not happens. fact9: The fact that both that uninterruptedness and this ticktacktoo happens hold if this easiness does not occurs. fact10: If that capitalist occurs this ministerialness occurs. fact11: The fact that either this astounding does not happens or the Vienneseness happens or both does not hold if this interbreeding does not happens. fact12: If this chromatographicalness does not occurs then that both this trouncing Hastings and that capitalist happens hold. fact13: The dysphemisticness occurs. fact14: That the ones and this tomentoseness happens is brought about by this non-hypodermicness. | fact1: {K} -> (¬{I} & {J}) fact2: ¬(¬{Q} v {P}) -> ¬{O} fact3: {E} -> {D} fact4: {B} fact5: {D} -> ¬(¬{A} v {B}) fact6: ¬{O} -> (¬{M} & ¬{N}) fact7: ¬{I} -> (¬{G} & ¬{H}) fact8: ¬(¬{A} v {B}) -> ¬{C} fact9: ¬{G} -> ({F} & {E}) fact10: {A} -> {C} fact11: ¬{R} -> ¬(¬{Q} v {P}) fact12: ¬{B} -> ({EQ} & {A}) fact13: {FP} fact14: ¬{M} -> ({K} & {L}) | [] | [] | This ministerialness does not happens. | ¬{C} | [] | 15 | 2 | null | 13 | 0 | 13 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Notthis jubilation but that Eucharist happens if the ones occurs. fact2: That arousal does not happens if the fact that this astounding does not occurs or the Vienneseness happens or both is wrong. fact3: This blastemicness occurs if this ticktacktoo happens. fact4: This chromatographicalness occurs. fact5: That that capitalist does not happens and/or this chromatographicalness happens is false if this blastemicness occurs. fact6: If that arousal does not happens then that hypodermicness does not happens and this blighting hyphen does not occurs. fact7: This easiness does not occurs and the carbonating talking does not happens if this jubilation does not occurs. fact8: If that that capitalist does not happens and/or this chromatographicalness happens is wrong then this ministerialness does not happens. fact9: The fact that both that uninterruptedness and this ticktacktoo happens hold if this easiness does not occurs. fact10: If that capitalist occurs this ministerialness occurs. fact11: The fact that either this astounding does not happens or the Vienneseness happens or both does not hold if this interbreeding does not happens. fact12: If this chromatographicalness does not occurs then that both this trouncing Hastings and that capitalist happens hold. fact13: The dysphemisticness occurs. fact14: That the ones and this tomentoseness happens is brought about by this non-hypodermicness. ; $hypothesis$ = This ministerialness does not happens. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That locale is not unimpressionable. | ¬{B}{a} | fact1: If that Tinea rams glistening that locale rams glistening. fact2: The loadstone is not a kind of a Ardea. fact3: The Ascomycetes is not a kind of a Woodbury. fact4: If something is vulvar that this thing is not unimpressionable and/or is not a Woodbury is not false. fact5: That locale offings Toronto if the fact that that locale is not a Kokka is true. fact6: That Tinea is vulvar if that omission is a Perodicticus. fact7: Someone rams glistening if the fact that it is not a kind of a Perodicticus is not wrong. fact8: If that omission rams glistening then that Tinea is vulvar. fact9: The fact that if that this boilersuit is not esoteric and it does not pile granuloma is incorrect then that autogiro pile granuloma hold. fact10: That locale is palatial. fact11: That this gallamine is not vulvar and is unimpressionable does not hold if that locale does ram glistening. fact12: Something does not rinse Arecaceae if it is not a Dacrydium and is dysplastic. fact13: Something is a kind of a pale if this thing piles granuloma. fact14: That somebody is not esoteric and does not pile granuloma does not hold if it is not non-schismatical. fact15: The fact that that locale is not unimpressionable is true if that Tinea is not unimpressionable. fact16: If something does not rinse Arecaceae then the thing either rams glistening or is a Perodicticus or both. fact17: The fact that that locale is unimpressionable is correct if that locale is not a Woodbury. fact18: The fact that this boilersuit is schismatical and not a schmeer hold if the loadstone is not a Ardea. fact19: That omission does not rinse Arecaceae if that autogiro does not rinse Arecaceae. fact20: Something that is a pale is not a Dacrydium and is dysplastic. | fact1: {D}{b} -> {D}{a} fact2: ¬{N}{f} fact3: ¬{A}{de} fact4: (x): {C}x -> (¬{B}x v ¬{A}x) fact5: ¬{EC}{a} -> {GG}{a} fact6: {E}{c} -> {C}{b} fact7: (x): ¬{E}x -> {D}x fact8: {D}{c} -> {C}{b} fact9: ¬(¬{L}{e} & ¬{J}{e}) -> {J}{d} fact10: {GU}{a} fact11: {D}{a} -> ¬(¬{C}{jf} & {B}{jf}) fact12: (x): (¬{G}x & {H}x) -> ¬{F}x fact13: (x): {J}x -> {I}x fact14: (x): {K}x -> ¬(¬{L}x & ¬{J}x) fact15: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬{B}{a} fact16: (x): ¬{F}x -> ({D}x v {E}x) fact17: ¬{A}{a} -> {B}{a} fact18: ¬{N}{f} -> ({K}{e} & ¬{M}{e}) fact19: ¬{F}{d} -> ¬{F}{c} fact20: (x): {I}x -> (¬{G}x & {H}x) | [] | [] | That locale is not unimpressionable. | ¬{B}{a} | [
"fact30 -> int1: That Tinea is not unimpressionable and/or it is not a Woodbury if it is vulvar.; fact28 -> int2: If that omission does not rinse Arecaceae then that omission rams glistening and/or is a Perodicticus.; fact29 -> int3: If that autogiro is not a Dacrydium and is dysplastic that autogiro does not rinse Arecaceae.; fact27 -> int4: If that autogiro is a pale it is not a Dacrydium and it is dysplastic.; fact22 -> int5: That autogiro is a pale if it piles granuloma.; fact24 -> int6: If this boilersuit is schismatical then that this boilersuit is not esoteric and he/she does not pile granuloma does not hold.; fact31 & fact33 -> int7: This boilersuit is schismatical but it is not a schmeer.; int7 -> int8: This boilersuit is schismatical.; int6 & int8 -> int9: The fact that this boilersuit is not esoteric and the thing does not pile granuloma does not hold.; fact26 & int9 -> int10: That autogiro piles granuloma.; int5 & int10 -> int11: That autogiro is a pale.; int4 & int11 -> int12: That autogiro is not a kind of a Dacrydium but it is dysplastic.; int3 & int12 -> int13: That that autogiro does not rinse Arecaceae is correct.; fact21 & int13 -> int14: The fact that that omission does not rinse Arecaceae is true.; int2 & int14 -> int15: That omission rams glistening and/or is a Perodicticus.; int15 & fact23 & fact32 -> int16: That Tinea is not non-vulvar.; int1 & int16 -> int17: Either that Tinea is not unimpressionable or he/she is not a Woodbury or both.;"
] | 12 | 1 | null | 19 | 0 | 19 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If that Tinea rams glistening that locale rams glistening. fact2: The loadstone is not a kind of a Ardea. fact3: The Ascomycetes is not a kind of a Woodbury. fact4: If something is vulvar that this thing is not unimpressionable and/or is not a Woodbury is not false. fact5: That locale offings Toronto if the fact that that locale is not a Kokka is true. fact6: That Tinea is vulvar if that omission is a Perodicticus. fact7: Someone rams glistening if the fact that it is not a kind of a Perodicticus is not wrong. fact8: If that omission rams glistening then that Tinea is vulvar. fact9: The fact that if that this boilersuit is not esoteric and it does not pile granuloma is incorrect then that autogiro pile granuloma hold. fact10: That locale is palatial. fact11: That this gallamine is not vulvar and is unimpressionable does not hold if that locale does ram glistening. fact12: Something does not rinse Arecaceae if it is not a Dacrydium and is dysplastic. fact13: Something is a kind of a pale if this thing piles granuloma. fact14: That somebody is not esoteric and does not pile granuloma does not hold if it is not non-schismatical. fact15: The fact that that locale is not unimpressionable is true if that Tinea is not unimpressionable. fact16: If something does not rinse Arecaceae then the thing either rams glistening or is a Perodicticus or both. fact17: The fact that that locale is unimpressionable is correct if that locale is not a Woodbury. fact18: The fact that this boilersuit is schismatical and not a schmeer hold if the loadstone is not a Ardea. fact19: That omission does not rinse Arecaceae if that autogiro does not rinse Arecaceae. fact20: Something that is a pale is not a Dacrydium and is dysplastic. ; $hypothesis$ = That locale is not unimpressionable. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That dance is not impressionable. | ¬{C}{a} | fact1: That devilfish is bacterial and it is impressionable. fact2: This mine enthuses. fact3: The jackstraw is a Annunciation. fact4: If that some person stalemates stretchability but it is not a Heterotheca is not right then it is not a kind of a Annunciation. fact5: If the spermatozoon is a kind of a acrostic and is a Turfan the spermatozoon is not a Annunciation. fact6: If some person is a kind of a fellowship and controverts Pagurus he/she does not skew largo. fact7: The fact that if that dance is a Szell and remains palaeogeology that dance is not impressionable is true. fact8: That dance is strategic and it is a aroid. fact9: That dance is a mottle and the thing defuses Cupressaceae. fact10: Some man is not impressionable if it enthuses and is a kind of a Annunciation. fact11: If something ADDS shibboleth and is a Anaheim then this thing does not discontinue Sphenopsida. fact12: That dance is a Annunciation. fact13: That dance enthuses. fact14: The fact that some man stalemates stretchability and is not a kind of a Heterotheca does not hold if it depreciates. fact15: Morgan is a Annunciation. fact16: That dance is impressionable and she enthuses if this reboxetine is not a Annunciation. fact17: If the cellblock rends Plotinus and is impressionable that he/she is not an ordering is right. fact18: If some man does roof disfunction and she/he is a Polypodiales then she/he does not behold Menuridae. fact19: Something does not ADD shibboleth if this longs and this is operable. fact20: That dance is a Psyllidae. fact21: That dance is operable. fact22: If that dance spays and it is a disconsolateness then it is unimpressionable. | fact1: ({DJ}{d} & {C}{d}) fact2: {A}{eu} fact3: {B}{in} fact4: (x): ¬({E}x & ¬{D}x) -> ¬{B}x fact5: ({HP}{ij} & {GM}{ij}) -> ¬{B}{ij} fact6: (x): ({Q}x & {T}x) -> ¬{HM}x fact7: ({GJ}{a} & {FE}{a}) -> ¬{C}{a} fact8: ({JH}{a} & {DM}{a}) fact9: ({AJ}{a} & {FR}{a}) fact10: (x): ({A}x & {B}x) -> ¬{C}x fact11: (x): ({IT}x & {BL}x) -> ¬{AI}x fact12: {B}{a} fact13: {A}{a} fact14: (x): {F}x -> ¬({E}x & ¬{D}x) fact15: {B}{gn} fact16: ¬{B}{b} -> ({C}{a} & {A}{a}) fact17: ({FS}{cb} & {C}{cb}) -> ¬{EI}{cb} fact18: (x): ({FJ}x & {BG}x) -> ¬{DK}x fact19: (x): ({FG}x & {GK}x) -> ¬{IT}x fact20: {CN}{a} fact21: {GK}{a} fact22: ({K}{a} & {FB}{a}) -> ¬{C}{a} | [
"fact13 & fact12 -> int1: That dance enthuses and is a kind of a Annunciation.; fact10 -> int2: If that dance enthuses and it is a Annunciation then it is not impressionable.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact13 & fact12 -> int1: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}); fact10 -> int2: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{C}{a}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | That dance is impressionable. | {C}{a} | [
"fact23 -> int3: That this reboxetine is not a Annunciation if that this reboxetine stalemates stretchability but it is not a Heterotheca does not hold is correct.; fact24 -> int4: The fact that this reboxetine stalemates stretchability but he is not a kind of a Heterotheca is wrong if he depreciates.;"
] | 6 | 2 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 19 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That devilfish is bacterial and it is impressionable. fact2: This mine enthuses. fact3: The jackstraw is a Annunciation. fact4: If that some person stalemates stretchability but it is not a Heterotheca is not right then it is not a kind of a Annunciation. fact5: If the spermatozoon is a kind of a acrostic and is a Turfan the spermatozoon is not a Annunciation. fact6: If some person is a kind of a fellowship and controverts Pagurus he/she does not skew largo. fact7: The fact that if that dance is a Szell and remains palaeogeology that dance is not impressionable is true. fact8: That dance is strategic and it is a aroid. fact9: That dance is a mottle and the thing defuses Cupressaceae. fact10: Some man is not impressionable if it enthuses and is a kind of a Annunciation. fact11: If something ADDS shibboleth and is a Anaheim then this thing does not discontinue Sphenopsida. fact12: That dance is a Annunciation. fact13: That dance enthuses. fact14: The fact that some man stalemates stretchability and is not a kind of a Heterotheca does not hold if it depreciates. fact15: Morgan is a Annunciation. fact16: That dance is impressionable and she enthuses if this reboxetine is not a Annunciation. fact17: If the cellblock rends Plotinus and is impressionable that he/she is not an ordering is right. fact18: If some man does roof disfunction and she/he is a Polypodiales then she/he does not behold Menuridae. fact19: Something does not ADD shibboleth if this longs and this is operable. fact20: That dance is a Psyllidae. fact21: That dance is operable. fact22: If that dance spays and it is a disconsolateness then it is unimpressionable. ; $hypothesis$ = That dance is not impressionable. ; $proof$ = | fact13 & fact12 -> int1: That dance enthuses and is a kind of a Annunciation.; fact10 -> int2: If that dance enthuses and it is a Annunciation then it is not impressionable.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That titan is not a Peronosporaceae. | ¬{B}{a} | fact1: If that supergrass understands then this florilegium understands. fact2: Some person is catachrestical but it does not interiorise plagiocephaly if the fact that it is not a kind of a Cushitic hold. fact3: If someone does not understand it is not a Santalum and not a Arrhenius. fact4: That beachball does not decree warped. fact5: That beachball is not a Santalum if this florilegium is a Santalum. fact6: If something is not a Santalum then it does not decree warped. fact7: If that beachball is a folliculitis but it does not decree warped that titan is a Peronosporaceae. fact8: That beachball is British but it does not degrade. fact9: If some person does not twin it is not spatiotemporal. fact10: This florilegium is a Santalum and/or is a Arrhenius. fact11: If somebody permeates then that it is both not an oversupply and a Jamaican is incorrect. fact12: This florilegium does not decree warped. fact13: That nutlet is not a Arrhenius. fact14: Some man is a folliculitis and does not decree warped if that person is not a Santalum. fact15: If this florilegium either is a kind of a Santalum or is a Arrhenius or both the fact that that beachball is not a Santalum is correct. fact16: If the fact that that titan is both a folliculitis and a Santalum is true then that beachball is a Peronosporaceae. fact17: If the fact that that beachball is not a Santalum hold it does not decree warped. fact18: That titan does not understand if that this florilegium is not an oversupply but a Jamaican is false. fact19: If something that is not a kind of a Santalum is not a Arrhenius that thing is not a Peronosporaceae. fact20: That titan is a Peronosporaceae if that beachball is a folliculitis and decrees warped. | fact1: {D}{c} -> {D}{b} fact2: (x): ¬{AK}x -> ({BI}x & ¬{CH}x) fact3: (x): ¬{D}x -> (¬{A}x & ¬{C}x) fact4: ¬{AB}{aa} fact5: {A}{b} -> ¬{A}{aa} fact6: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬{AB}x fact7: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{a} fact8: ({CD}{aa} & ¬{AE}{aa}) fact9: (x): ¬{BF}x -> ¬{FJ}x fact10: ({A}{b} v {C}{b}) fact11: (x): {G}x -> ¬(¬{F}x & {E}x) fact12: ¬{AB}{b} fact13: ¬{C}{jg} fact14: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact15: ({A}{b} v {C}{b}) -> ¬{A}{aa} fact16: ({AA}{a} & {A}{a}) -> {B}{aa} fact17: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬{AB}{aa} fact18: ¬(¬{F}{b} & {E}{b}) -> ¬{D}{a} fact19: (x): (¬{A}x & ¬{C}x) -> ¬{B}x fact20: ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{a} | [
"fact14 -> int1: If that beachball is not a kind of a Santalum then that is a folliculitis that does not decree warped.; fact15 & fact10 -> int2: That beachball is not a Santalum.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That beachball is a folliculitis and does not decree warped.; int3 & fact7 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact14 -> int1: ¬{A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}); fact15 & fact10 -> int2: ¬{A}{aa}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}); int3 & fact7 -> hypothesis;"
] | That titan is not a Peronosporaceae. | ¬{B}{a} | [
"fact21 -> int4: If that titan is not a Santalum and is not a Arrhenius this thing is not a kind of a Peronosporaceae.; fact23 -> int5: That titan is not a Santalum and is not a Arrhenius if it does not understand.; fact22 -> int6: If this florilegium does permeate then the fact that it is not an oversupply and it is a kind of a Jamaican is incorrect.;"
] | 6 | 3 | 3 | 16 | 0 | 16 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If that supergrass understands then this florilegium understands. fact2: Some person is catachrestical but it does not interiorise plagiocephaly if the fact that it is not a kind of a Cushitic hold. fact3: If someone does not understand it is not a Santalum and not a Arrhenius. fact4: That beachball does not decree warped. fact5: That beachball is not a Santalum if this florilegium is a Santalum. fact6: If something is not a Santalum then it does not decree warped. fact7: If that beachball is a folliculitis but it does not decree warped that titan is a Peronosporaceae. fact8: That beachball is British but it does not degrade. fact9: If some person does not twin it is not spatiotemporal. fact10: This florilegium is a Santalum and/or is a Arrhenius. fact11: If somebody permeates then that it is both not an oversupply and a Jamaican is incorrect. fact12: This florilegium does not decree warped. fact13: That nutlet is not a Arrhenius. fact14: Some man is a folliculitis and does not decree warped if that person is not a Santalum. fact15: If this florilegium either is a kind of a Santalum or is a Arrhenius or both the fact that that beachball is not a Santalum is correct. fact16: If the fact that that titan is both a folliculitis and a Santalum is true then that beachball is a Peronosporaceae. fact17: If the fact that that beachball is not a Santalum hold it does not decree warped. fact18: That titan does not understand if that this florilegium is not an oversupply but a Jamaican is false. fact19: If something that is not a kind of a Santalum is not a Arrhenius that thing is not a Peronosporaceae. fact20: That titan is a Peronosporaceae if that beachball is a folliculitis and decrees warped. ; $hypothesis$ = That titan is not a Peronosporaceae. ; $proof$ = | fact14 -> int1: If that beachball is not a kind of a Santalum then that is a folliculitis that does not decree warped.; fact15 & fact10 -> int2: That beachball is not a Santalum.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That beachball is a folliculitis and does not decree warped.; int3 & fact7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | The fact that that that taxonomist is compressible hold if that taxonomist is a saying or that one is not a kind of a paramilitary or both is not true. | ¬(({AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa}) | fact1: If that taxonomist is a kind of a saying it is compressible. fact2: If either that taxonomist is apiarian or this one is not a paramilitary or both then that taxonomist contrasts Novgorod. fact3: If some person is a Casals and/or she is not unorganised she hymns connoisseurship. fact4: If either something is a kind of a Sanguinaria or this thing is not genitourinary or both this thing is Senegalese. fact5: That taxonomist is compressible if that taxonomist prostrates or is not Nicene or both. fact6: If some man is a kind of a saying and/or it is a paramilitary the fact that it is not compressible does not hold. fact7: Something that does hymn connoisseurship or is non-Nicene or both is not incapable. fact8: Something is thallophytic if either the thing is uncertain or the thing is not memberless or both. fact9: If the dyewood either fettles amebiosis or is not a kind of an accusative or both then this one is lossless. fact10: Somebody is not disingenuous if it lowers Priam and/or it does not promulgate ablepharia. fact11: Someone that Monitors deictic or is dissimilar or both is not non-Ukrainian. fact12: If that taxonomist is a kind of a gaudiness or it is not a saying or both then it mines oblivion. fact13: Somebody is compressible if it is a kind of a saying and/or it is not a kind of a paramilitary. fact14: That taxonomist is compressible if that taxonomist maculates prize or is not stoichiometric or both. fact15: Some person is compressible if it is a saying. fact16: If that taxonomist is a saying and/or is a paramilitary then it is compressible. fact17: Some man is genitourinary if that one does focalise Cherepovets and/or is not a kind of a Fraulein. fact18: If somebody bruises succubus and/or is not a kind of a Minotaur that person does lower Priam. fact19: Something that either is exuvial or is not multinucleate or both is heterodactyl. | fact1: {AA}{aa} -> {B}{aa} fact2: ({CB}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {L}{aa} fact3: (x): ({HS}x v ¬{IA}x) -> {BB}x fact4: (x): ({AP}x v ¬{HR}x) -> {HG}x fact5: ({JJ}{aa} v ¬{DE}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} fact6: (x): ({AA}x v {AB}x) -> {B}x fact7: (x): ({BB}x v ¬{DE}x) -> {CM}x fact8: (x): ({FM}x v ¬{BK}x) -> {JH}x fact9: ({CF}{df} v ¬{CS}{df}) -> {DA}{df} fact10: (x): ({IN}x v ¬{CJ}x) -> {AS}x fact11: (x): ({AK}x v ¬{CT}x) -> {II}x fact12: ({GJ}{aa} v ¬{AA}{aa}) -> {CC}{aa} fact13: (x): ({AA}x v ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x fact14: ({M}{aa} v ¬{AF}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} fact15: (x): {AA}x -> {B}x fact16: ({AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} fact17: (x): ({JF}x v ¬{AM}x) -> {HR}x fact18: (x): ({G}x v ¬{GD}x) -> {IN}x fact19: (x): ({I}x v ¬{AC}x) -> {JG}x | [
"fact13 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact13 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 1 | 1 | 18 | 0 | 18 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: If that taxonomist is a kind of a saying it is compressible. fact2: If either that taxonomist is apiarian or this one is not a paramilitary or both then that taxonomist contrasts Novgorod. fact3: If some person is a Casals and/or she is not unorganised she hymns connoisseurship. fact4: If either something is a kind of a Sanguinaria or this thing is not genitourinary or both this thing is Senegalese. fact5: That taxonomist is compressible if that taxonomist prostrates or is not Nicene or both. fact6: If some man is a kind of a saying and/or it is a paramilitary the fact that it is not compressible does not hold. fact7: Something that does hymn connoisseurship or is non-Nicene or both is not incapable. fact8: Something is thallophytic if either the thing is uncertain or the thing is not memberless or both. fact9: If the dyewood either fettles amebiosis or is not a kind of an accusative or both then this one is lossless. fact10: Somebody is not disingenuous if it lowers Priam and/or it does not promulgate ablepharia. fact11: Someone that Monitors deictic or is dissimilar or both is not non-Ukrainian. fact12: If that taxonomist is a kind of a gaudiness or it is not a saying or both then it mines oblivion. fact13: Somebody is compressible if it is a kind of a saying and/or it is not a kind of a paramilitary. fact14: That taxonomist is compressible if that taxonomist maculates prize or is not stoichiometric or both. fact15: Some person is compressible if it is a saying. fact16: If that taxonomist is a saying and/or is a paramilitary then it is compressible. fact17: Some man is genitourinary if that one does focalise Cherepovets and/or is not a kind of a Fraulein. fact18: If somebody bruises succubus and/or is not a kind of a Minotaur that person does lower Priam. fact19: Something that either is exuvial or is not multinucleate or both is heterodactyl. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that that taxonomist is compressible hold if that taxonomist is a saying or that one is not a kind of a paramilitary or both is not true. ; $proof$ = | fact13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | Let's assume that this recompensing does not happens and this pounding does not happens. | (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) | fact1: The sculpting does not occurs if the unionization but notthe shamble occurs. fact2: That gouge does not occurs and that thalassicness does not occurs. fact3: This falsification does not happens. fact4: If that swearing myodynia happens that arterioscleroticness occurs. fact5: That this recompensing but notthis pounding occurs leads to this non-arterioscleroticness. fact6: That this recompensing but notthis pounding happens is false. fact7: That the faucalness occurs but the overgrowing Bombay does not happens is false. fact8: That unbelievableness does not occurs and that pretorianness does not occurs. fact9: If the fact that that palatialness does not happens is correct the fact that that swearing myodynia and this non-arterioscleroticness occurs is wrong. fact10: If the abstemiousness does not occurs but that bolivia happens the fledgeding does not happens. fact11: That swearing myodynia happens. fact12: The abstemiousness does not happens but that bolivia happens if this landslip does not occurs. fact13: That aestivating occurs. fact14: That this recompensing does not occurs and this pounding does not occurs is caused by that that swearing myodynia does not occurs. fact15: If the fledgeding does not occurs this thrash does not happens and that palatialness does not happens. fact16: That this cometicness happens prevents that that arenicolousness does not occurs. fact17: The fact that that the docking Testudinata happens but that session does not happens is wrong is true. fact18: That this recompensing does not happens and this pounding happens is false. | fact1: ({GQ} & ¬{GT}) -> ¬{AS} fact2: (¬{AE} & ¬{EQ}) fact3: ¬{CQ} fact4: {A} -> {B} fact5: ({AA} & ¬{AB}) -> ¬{B} fact6: ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) fact7: ¬({AL} & ¬{HH}) fact8: (¬{IL} & ¬{CD}) fact9: ¬{C} -> ¬({A} & ¬{B}) fact10: (¬{F} & {G}) -> ¬{E} fact11: {A} fact12: ¬{H} -> (¬{F} & {G}) fact13: {BC} fact14: ¬{A} -> (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) fact15: ¬{E} -> (¬{D} & ¬{C}) fact16: {EB} -> {BQ} fact17: ¬({EH} & ¬{CK}) fact18: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that this recompensing does not happens and this pounding does not happens.; fact4 & fact11 -> int1: That arterioscleroticness happens.;"
] | [
"void -> assump1: (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}); fact4 & fact11 -> int1: {B};"
] | Let's assume that this recompensing does not happens and this pounding does not happens. | (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) | [] | 10 | 3 | null | 16 | 0 | 16 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: The sculpting does not occurs if the unionization but notthe shamble occurs. fact2: That gouge does not occurs and that thalassicness does not occurs. fact3: This falsification does not happens. fact4: If that swearing myodynia happens that arterioscleroticness occurs. fact5: That this recompensing but notthis pounding occurs leads to this non-arterioscleroticness. fact6: That this recompensing but notthis pounding happens is false. fact7: That the faucalness occurs but the overgrowing Bombay does not happens is false. fact8: That unbelievableness does not occurs and that pretorianness does not occurs. fact9: If the fact that that palatialness does not happens is correct the fact that that swearing myodynia and this non-arterioscleroticness occurs is wrong. fact10: If the abstemiousness does not occurs but that bolivia happens the fledgeding does not happens. fact11: That swearing myodynia happens. fact12: The abstemiousness does not happens but that bolivia happens if this landslip does not occurs. fact13: That aestivating occurs. fact14: That this recompensing does not occurs and this pounding does not occurs is caused by that that swearing myodynia does not occurs. fact15: If the fledgeding does not occurs this thrash does not happens and that palatialness does not happens. fact16: That this cometicness happens prevents that that arenicolousness does not occurs. fact17: The fact that that the docking Testudinata happens but that session does not happens is wrong is true. fact18: That this recompensing does not happens and this pounding happens is false. ; $hypothesis$ = Let's assume that this recompensing does not happens and this pounding does not happens. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That that elytron is a kind of molecular thing that is not flatter does not hold. | ¬({A}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) | fact1: If something is a kind of a Farragut that is molecular. fact2: The fact that somebody is a kind of molecular one that is not flatter does not hold if it does not Grass patness. fact3: That elytron is not mecopterous if that elytron is cheerful and it is not efficacious. fact4: If the fact that this acarid is a resource and that is a Windaus is incorrect that that is not peaty is correct. fact5: That if that elytron is a Trotskyism but it does not slither then that elytron is not a kind of a liberalism is right. fact6: If something is not peaty then the fact that that is flatter and Grasses patness does not hold. fact7: If that elytron is not mecopterous this thing is a Trotskyism and this thing does not slither. fact8: If that elytron is not a liberalism then it is both a Farragut and crustose. fact9: That elytron does not Grass patness if this acarid hedges Pouteria but it is not multidimensional. fact10: That elytron is not uncheerful and not efficacious. fact11: This acarid hedges Pouteria and is not multidimensional. | fact1: (x): {D}x -> {A}x fact2: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬({A}x & ¬{C}x) fact3: (¬{N}{b} & ¬{M}{b}) -> ¬{L}{b} fact4: ¬({I}{a} & {H}{a}) -> ¬{G}{a} fact5: ({J}{b} & ¬{K}{b}) -> ¬{F}{b} fact6: (x): ¬{G}x -> ¬({C}x & {B}x) fact7: ¬{L}{b} -> ({J}{b} & ¬{K}{b}) fact8: ¬{F}{b} -> ({D}{b} & {E}{b}) fact9: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact10: (¬{N}{b} & ¬{M}{b}) fact11: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) | [
"fact9 & fact11 -> int1: The fact that that elytron does not Grass patness is right.; fact2 -> int2: The fact that that elytron is molecular but it is non-flatter does not hold if it does not Grass patness.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact9 & fact11 -> int1: ¬{B}{b}; fact2 -> int2: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬({A}{b} & ¬{C}{b}); int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | That elytron is molecular but the thing is not flatter. | ({A}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) | [
"fact18 -> int3: If that elytron is a Farragut then that elytron is molecular.; fact14 & fact16 -> int4: The fact that that elytron is not mecopterous is correct.; fact17 & int4 -> int5: That elytron is a kind of a Trotskyism and does not slither.; fact13 & int5 -> int6: That elytron is not a liberalism.; fact12 & int6 -> int7: That elytron is both a Farragut and crustose.; int7 -> int8: That elytron is a Farragut.; int3 & int8 -> int9: That elytron is molecular.; fact19 -> int10: That this acarid is flatter and it Grasses patness is incorrect if it is not peaty.;"
] | 7 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 8 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If something is a kind of a Farragut that is molecular. fact2: The fact that somebody is a kind of molecular one that is not flatter does not hold if it does not Grass patness. fact3: That elytron is not mecopterous if that elytron is cheerful and it is not efficacious. fact4: If the fact that this acarid is a resource and that is a Windaus is incorrect that that is not peaty is correct. fact5: That if that elytron is a Trotskyism but it does not slither then that elytron is not a kind of a liberalism is right. fact6: If something is not peaty then the fact that that is flatter and Grasses patness does not hold. fact7: If that elytron is not mecopterous this thing is a Trotskyism and this thing does not slither. fact8: If that elytron is not a liberalism then it is both a Farragut and crustose. fact9: That elytron does not Grass patness if this acarid hedges Pouteria but it is not multidimensional. fact10: That elytron is not uncheerful and not efficacious. fact11: This acarid hedges Pouteria and is not multidimensional. ; $hypothesis$ = That that elytron is a kind of molecular thing that is not flatter does not hold. ; $proof$ = | fact9 & fact11 -> int1: The fact that that elytron does not Grass patness is right.; fact2 -> int2: The fact that that elytron is molecular but it is non-flatter does not hold if it does not Grass patness.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That stipule is alpine. | {B}{a} | fact1: That stipule is not alpine if the fact that it is not mercantile is correct. fact2: That stipule is alpine if that talent is mercantile. fact3: Someone is not mercantile if that he is a Physostigma and/or he is not non-alpine is false. fact4: If that something is a kind of a Physostigma hold that it is not mercantile or fictile or both is false. fact5: This metabola is not a Riksmaal if the person is not a Riksmaal and/or the person is a little. fact6: That subverter is not alpine if that subverter is not a kind of a quaff. fact7: This snowsuit is hydrolyzable if the fact that this hone either is hydrolyzable or does not preordain luridness or both is incorrect. fact8: That carcase is not a Mexican but a palilalia if this snowsuit is hydrolyzable. fact9: If that stipule is not fictile the fact that that camp is a Physostigma or it is alpine or both is false. fact10: The rubble does not preordain luridness if this seminarist is monocotyledonous and that preordain luridness. fact11: If that carcase is not a Mexican but a palilalia then that anovulation is a kind of a Mexican. fact12: This seminarist is monocotyledonous and preordains luridness if this metabola is not a kind of a Riksmaal. fact13: That talent is mercantile if the fact that that anovulation is mercantile or fictile or both is incorrect. fact14: That stipule is non-mercantile. fact15: If something is not a Ninkharsag and it is not a kind of a MBD it is a Physostigma. fact16: Somebody is not a kind of a Ninkharsag and it is not a kind of a MBD if it is a Mexican. | fact1: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{B}{a} fact2: {A}{b} -> {B}{a} fact3: (x): ¬({C}x v {B}x) -> ¬{A}x fact4: (x): {C}x -> ¬(¬{A}x v {D}x) fact5: (¬{L}{i} v {M}{i}) -> ¬{L}{i} fact6: ¬{CP}{cm} -> ¬{B}{cm} fact7: ¬({H}{f} v ¬{K}{f}) -> {H}{e} fact8: {H}{e} -> (¬{G}{d} & {I}{d}) fact9: ¬{D}{a} -> ¬({C}{ak} v {B}{ak}) fact10: ({J}{h} & {K}{h}) -> ¬{K}{g} fact11: (¬{G}{d} & {I}{d}) -> {G}{c} fact12: ¬{L}{i} -> ({J}{h} & {K}{h}) fact13: ¬(¬{A}{c} v {D}{c}) -> {A}{b} fact14: ¬{A}{a} fact15: (x): (¬{F}x & ¬{E}x) -> {C}x fact16: (x): {G}x -> (¬{F}x & ¬{E}x) | [
"fact1 & fact14 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact1 & fact14 -> hypothesis;"
] | That stipule is alpine. | {B}{a} | [
"fact17 -> int1: That that anovulation is not mercantile and/or this person is fictile is incorrect if that anovulation is a kind of a Physostigma.; fact20 -> int2: If that anovulation is not a Ninkharsag and this is not a MBD that anovulation is a Physostigma.; fact22 -> int3: That anovulation is both not a Ninkharsag and not a MBD if that anovulation is a Mexican.;"
] | 13 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 0 | 14 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That stipule is not alpine if the fact that it is not mercantile is correct. fact2: That stipule is alpine if that talent is mercantile. fact3: Someone is not mercantile if that he is a Physostigma and/or he is not non-alpine is false. fact4: If that something is a kind of a Physostigma hold that it is not mercantile or fictile or both is false. fact5: This metabola is not a Riksmaal if the person is not a Riksmaal and/or the person is a little. fact6: That subverter is not alpine if that subverter is not a kind of a quaff. fact7: This snowsuit is hydrolyzable if the fact that this hone either is hydrolyzable or does not preordain luridness or both is incorrect. fact8: That carcase is not a Mexican but a palilalia if this snowsuit is hydrolyzable. fact9: If that stipule is not fictile the fact that that camp is a Physostigma or it is alpine or both is false. fact10: The rubble does not preordain luridness if this seminarist is monocotyledonous and that preordain luridness. fact11: If that carcase is not a Mexican but a palilalia then that anovulation is a kind of a Mexican. fact12: This seminarist is monocotyledonous and preordains luridness if this metabola is not a kind of a Riksmaal. fact13: That talent is mercantile if the fact that that anovulation is mercantile or fictile or both is incorrect. fact14: That stipule is non-mercantile. fact15: If something is not a Ninkharsag and it is not a kind of a MBD it is a Physostigma. fact16: Somebody is not a kind of a Ninkharsag and it is not a kind of a MBD if it is a Mexican. ; $hypothesis$ = That stipule is alpine. ; $proof$ = | fact1 & fact14 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That circularness does not occurs. | ¬{B} | fact1: That that periodicalness does not occurs and that shiatsu does not happens results in that that circularness does not happens. fact2: That circularness occurs if that this non-circularness and this deserted occurs does not hold. fact3: The fact that that vicennialness happens but that deepening Bozeman does not occurs is wrong if this yielding winter happens. fact4: This deserted happens. fact5: That periodicalness does not occurs and that shiatsu does not occurs if this deserted happens. fact6: That this effacing curableness does not happens and/or that this belling competitiveness does not happens prevents this effacing curableness. fact7: If this crushing does not happens that that definiteness does not happens and this budgeting Nebraska does not happens is not correct. fact8: This arboreousness does not occurs if that that definiteness does not happens and this budgeting Nebraska does not occurs does not hold. fact9: This belling competitiveness does not occurs if that the interrogative and/or this tinking occurs does not hold. fact10: The fact that that cleanup does not happens and this deserted does not occurs is incorrect if the fact that that circularness occurs hold. fact11: This non-periodicalness is caused by that this deserted occurs. fact12: If the fact that that vicennialness occurs but that deepening Bozeman does not occurs is wrong then the fact that this crushing does not occurs is true. fact13: That circularness happens and this dogfight occurs if the fact that this arboreousness does not occurs is right. fact14: That this non-circularness and this deserted happens is incorrect if this dogfight does not occurs. fact15: The feminism does not happens but this yielding winter occurs if this effacing curableness does not occurs. fact16: If the fact that the fact that that cleanup does not occurs and this deserted does not occurs hold does not hold then that that cleanup does not happens is false. | fact1: (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) -> ¬{B} fact2: ¬(¬{B} & {A}) -> {B} fact3: {J} -> ¬({H} & ¬{I}) fact4: {A} fact5: {A} -> (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) fact6: (¬{L} v ¬{N}) -> ¬{L} fact7: ¬{G} -> ¬(¬{F} & ¬{E}) fact8: ¬(¬{F} & ¬{E}) -> ¬{D} fact9: ¬({M} v {O}) -> ¬{N} fact10: {B} -> ¬(¬{BK} & ¬{A}) fact11: {A} -> ¬{AA} fact12: ¬({H} & ¬{I}) -> ¬{G} fact13: ¬{D} -> ({B} & {C}) fact14: ¬{C} -> ¬(¬{B} & {A}) fact15: ¬{L} -> (¬{K} & {J}) fact16: ¬(¬{BK} & ¬{A}) -> {BK} | [
"fact5 & fact4 -> int1: That periodicalness does not happens and that shiatsu does not happens.; int1 & fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact5 & fact4 -> int1: (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}); int1 & fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | That circularness happens. | {B} | [] | 7 | 2 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 13 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That that periodicalness does not occurs and that shiatsu does not happens results in that that circularness does not happens. fact2: That circularness occurs if that this non-circularness and this deserted occurs does not hold. fact3: The fact that that vicennialness happens but that deepening Bozeman does not occurs is wrong if this yielding winter happens. fact4: This deserted happens. fact5: That periodicalness does not occurs and that shiatsu does not occurs if this deserted happens. fact6: That this effacing curableness does not happens and/or that this belling competitiveness does not happens prevents this effacing curableness. fact7: If this crushing does not happens that that definiteness does not happens and this budgeting Nebraska does not happens is not correct. fact8: This arboreousness does not occurs if that that definiteness does not happens and this budgeting Nebraska does not occurs does not hold. fact9: This belling competitiveness does not occurs if that the interrogative and/or this tinking occurs does not hold. fact10: The fact that that cleanup does not happens and this deserted does not occurs is incorrect if the fact that that circularness occurs hold. fact11: This non-periodicalness is caused by that this deserted occurs. fact12: If the fact that that vicennialness occurs but that deepening Bozeman does not occurs is wrong then the fact that this crushing does not occurs is true. fact13: That circularness happens and this dogfight occurs if the fact that this arboreousness does not occurs is right. fact14: That this non-circularness and this deserted happens is incorrect if this dogfight does not occurs. fact15: The feminism does not happens but this yielding winter occurs if this effacing curableness does not occurs. fact16: If the fact that the fact that that cleanup does not occurs and this deserted does not occurs hold does not hold then that that cleanup does not happens is false. ; $hypothesis$ = That circularness does not occurs. ; $proof$ = | fact5 & fact4 -> int1: That periodicalness does not happens and that shiatsu does not happens.; int1 & fact1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That fossilising does not occurs and this fulfillment does not happens. | (¬{C} & ¬{D}) | fact1: That this sleuperson herpangia occurs causes that that fossilising does not happens. fact2: This fulfillment does not occurs if both that report and this non-Dostoevskianness happens. fact3: The storming occurs if that that mirroring perquisite does not occurs and the consciousness does not occurs does not hold. fact4: That both this non-seraphicness and this bandaging Carcharhinus occurs does not hold. fact5: If the pitcher happens the alining elastosis occurs. fact6: The storming triggers that this bandaging Carcharhinus but notthe raddling Taurotragus occurs. fact7: That that Dostoevskianness happens hold. fact8: If the carillon happens then that both this non-piraticalness and this non-warmerness happens is incorrect. fact9: The crystallisedness occurs. fact10: The mocking hypocorism occurs. fact11: That notthe faltering but the unobligatedness occurs does not hold. fact12: That that Dostoevskianness occurs results in that report. fact13: That that sleuthing herpangia happens is caused by that interspecificness. fact14: If this bandaging Carcharhinus occurs that that report but notthat Dostoevskianness happens hold. fact15: If the externalization occurs then the fact that this redepositing treasured does not happens and this atomisticalness does not occurs is false. fact16: The fact that notthat fossilising but this fulfillment happens is incorrect if that report happens. fact17: That that fossilising but notthis fulfillment happens is not right. fact18: That interspecificness happens and that sounder happens if that the choreography does not happens hold. fact19: If that report happens then the fact that that fossilising does not happens and this fulfillment does not occurs is false. | fact1: {E} -> ¬{C} fact2: ({B} & ¬{A}) -> ¬{D} fact3: ¬(¬{K} & ¬{L}) -> {I} fact4: ¬(¬{JF} & {F}) fact5: {IH} -> {II} fact6: {I} -> ({F} & ¬{H}) fact7: {A} fact8: {GR} -> ¬(¬{FJ} & ¬{IK}) fact9: {EA} fact10: {HK} fact11: ¬(¬{HI} & {GG}) fact12: {A} -> {B} fact13: {G} -> {E} fact14: {F} -> ({B} & ¬{A}) fact15: {HR} -> ¬(¬{JB} & ¬{N}) fact16: {B} -> ¬(¬{C} & {D}) fact17: ¬({C} & ¬{D}) fact18: ¬{O} -> ({G} & {J}) fact19: {B} -> ¬(¬{C} & ¬{D}) | [
"fact12 & fact7 -> int1: That report happens.; int1 & fact19 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact12 & fact7 -> int1: {B}; int1 & fact19 -> hypothesis;"
] | That fossilising does not occurs and this fulfillment does not happens. | (¬{C} & ¬{D}) | [] | 8 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 0 | 16 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That this sleuperson herpangia occurs causes that that fossilising does not happens. fact2: This fulfillment does not occurs if both that report and this non-Dostoevskianness happens. fact3: The storming occurs if that that mirroring perquisite does not occurs and the consciousness does not occurs does not hold. fact4: That both this non-seraphicness and this bandaging Carcharhinus occurs does not hold. fact5: If the pitcher happens the alining elastosis occurs. fact6: The storming triggers that this bandaging Carcharhinus but notthe raddling Taurotragus occurs. fact7: That that Dostoevskianness happens hold. fact8: If the carillon happens then that both this non-piraticalness and this non-warmerness happens is incorrect. fact9: The crystallisedness occurs. fact10: The mocking hypocorism occurs. fact11: That notthe faltering but the unobligatedness occurs does not hold. fact12: That that Dostoevskianness occurs results in that report. fact13: That that sleuthing herpangia happens is caused by that interspecificness. fact14: If this bandaging Carcharhinus occurs that that report but notthat Dostoevskianness happens hold. fact15: If the externalization occurs then the fact that this redepositing treasured does not happens and this atomisticalness does not occurs is false. fact16: The fact that notthat fossilising but this fulfillment happens is incorrect if that report happens. fact17: That that fossilising but notthis fulfillment happens is not right. fact18: That interspecificness happens and that sounder happens if that the choreography does not happens hold. fact19: If that report happens then the fact that that fossilising does not happens and this fulfillment does not occurs is false. ; $hypothesis$ = That fossilising does not occurs and this fulfillment does not happens. ; $proof$ = | fact12 & fact7 -> int1: That report happens.; int1 & fact19 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That everything is not a kind of a graze is false. | ¬((x): ¬{A}x) | fact1: Something is a graze and is not an affiliate if it is violable. fact2: If somebody is not a Centropomidae the fact that it is inviolable and extenuates Plzen is not correct. fact3: The fact that everything is not cometic is correct. fact4: Every man is not carnivorous. fact5: That everything is non-insurrectional is true. fact6: Everything is not a Pteris. fact7: Everybody is not a graze. fact8: Every person is not anoperineal. fact9: Everybody is not a clue. fact10: If something is not a Centropomidae then the fact that this is violable and a graze does not hold. fact11: Every person does not extenuate Plzen and is not a Centropomidae. | fact1: (x): {B}x -> ({A}x & ¬{GP}x) fact2: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬(¬{B}x & {D}x) fact3: (x): ¬{ID}x fact4: (x): ¬{IF}x fact5: (x): ¬{ER}x fact6: (x): ¬{JE}x fact7: (x): ¬{A}x fact8: (x): ¬{HC}x fact9: (x): ¬{BJ}x fact10: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬({B}x & {A}x) fact11: (x): (¬{D}x & ¬{C}x) | [
"fact7 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact7 -> hypothesis;"
] | Everything is not an affiliate. | (x): ¬{GP}x | [
"fact12 -> int1: If that khalif is violable then it is a graze and it is not a kind of an affiliate.; fact13 -> int2: If that khalif is not a Centropomidae then that that khalif is not violable but it extenuates Plzen does not hold.;"
] | 6 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Something is a graze and is not an affiliate if it is violable. fact2: If somebody is not a Centropomidae the fact that it is inviolable and extenuates Plzen is not correct. fact3: The fact that everything is not cometic is correct. fact4: Every man is not carnivorous. fact5: That everything is non-insurrectional is true. fact6: Everything is not a Pteris. fact7: Everybody is not a graze. fact8: Every person is not anoperineal. fact9: Everybody is not a clue. fact10: If something is not a Centropomidae then the fact that this is violable and a graze does not hold. fact11: Every person does not extenuate Plzen and is not a Centropomidae. ; $hypothesis$ = That everything is not a kind of a graze is false. ; $proof$ = | fact7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | If that biogeographicness happens then either this multilingualness occurs or this gemination does not happens or both. | {A} -> ({B} v ¬{C}) | fact1: That that heterosporousness occurs leads to that this gemination but notthis multilingualness occurs. fact2: This multilingualness occurs if that biogeographicness happens. fact3: If this multilingualness does not occurs then that Delphianness occurs and that biogeographicness happens. | fact1: {D} -> ({C} & ¬{B}) fact2: {A} -> {B} fact3: ¬{B} -> ({EJ} & {A}) | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that that biogeographicness happens.; fact2 & assump1 -> int1: That this multilingualness occurs hold.; int1 -> int2: This multilingualness occurs and/or this gemination does not occurs.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"void -> assump1: {A}; fact2 & assump1 -> int1: {B}; int1 -> int2: ({B} v ¬{C}); [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | That Delphianness happens. | {EJ} | [] | 7 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That that heterosporousness occurs leads to that this gemination but notthis multilingualness occurs. fact2: This multilingualness occurs if that biogeographicness happens. fact3: If this multilingualness does not occurs then that Delphianness occurs and that biogeographicness happens. ; $hypothesis$ = If that biogeographicness happens then either this multilingualness occurs or this gemination does not happens or both. ; $proof$ = | void -> assump1: Let's assume that that biogeographicness happens.; fact2 & assump1 -> int1: That this multilingualness occurs hold.; int1 -> int2: This multilingualness occurs and/or this gemination does not occurs.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | This huckster is not autoradiographic. | ¬{B}{c} | fact1: The fact that the Ubermensch harangues Desmodium and does not scab chumminess does not hold. fact2: This pallium is not upstream. fact3: The fact that this pallium is not genetical is true. fact4: This huckster is not autoradiographic if that this jaguar is not thermogravimetric and not incorrigible is not correct. fact5: The fact that this jaguar is thermogravimetric and is not incorrigible is wrong. fact6: If this pallium is not upstream the fact that this jaguar is not thermogravimetric and is not incorrigible is incorrect. fact7: Something that is not a busted or not a trucking or both is not a busted. fact8: Someone is autoradiographic and it is upstream if it is not a busted. | fact1: ¬({CD}{as} & ¬{CK}{as}) fact2: ¬{A}{a} fact3: ¬{HI}{a} fact4: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) -> ¬{B}{c} fact5: ¬({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact6: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact7: (x): (¬{C}x v ¬{E}x) -> ¬{C}x fact8: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({B}x & {A}x) | [
"fact6 & fact2 -> int1: That this jaguar is a kind of non-thermogravimetric man that is not incorrigible is wrong.; int1 & fact4 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact6 & fact2 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}); int1 & fact4 -> hypothesis;"
] | That this huckster is autoradiographic hold. | {B}{c} | [
"fact10 -> int2: This huckster is not non-autoradiographic and this one is upstream if this huckster is not a kind of a busted.; fact9 -> int3: If this huckster is not a busted and/or she/he is not a kind of a trucking she/he is not a busted.;"
] | 5 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 5 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: The fact that the Ubermensch harangues Desmodium and does not scab chumminess does not hold. fact2: This pallium is not upstream. fact3: The fact that this pallium is not genetical is true. fact4: This huckster is not autoradiographic if that this jaguar is not thermogravimetric and not incorrigible is not correct. fact5: The fact that this jaguar is thermogravimetric and is not incorrigible is wrong. fact6: If this pallium is not upstream the fact that this jaguar is not thermogravimetric and is not incorrigible is incorrect. fact7: Something that is not a busted or not a trucking or both is not a busted. fact8: Someone is autoradiographic and it is upstream if it is not a busted. ; $hypothesis$ = This huckster is not autoradiographic. ; $proof$ = | fact6 & fact2 -> int1: That this jaguar is a kind of non-thermogravimetric man that is not incorrigible is wrong.; int1 & fact4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That that ixodid is non-inextensible person that does not reconnoitre Pyrolaceae is false. | ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) | fact1: If that boss is a kind of non-biped one that does not snivel Pushkin the hireling does snivel Pushkin. fact2: A non-inextensible person is inextensible person that does not reconnoitre Pyrolaceae. fact3: That boss is non-biped man that does not snivel Pushkin. fact4: That boxershorts is not a shocked and that is not neutral if the fact that that that is a shocked is wrong is not false. fact5: That ixodid is not Dickensian. fact6: If the fact that that indapamide does not bobble laparocele and/or he/she drives Dipogon does not hold this hominid is not biologistic. fact7: If this hominid is not biologistic that that pier abandons carful and is mononucleate is not right. fact8: The chloroform is a kind of major thing that is not a Gerreidae. fact9: That if that goldcrest is non-propagative and it does not ration entrancement then that goldcrest is not Celtic is right. fact10: That that indapamide does not bobble laparocele and/or that drives Dipogon is incorrect if that delicacy is a kind of a Datura. fact11: If that transcendentalist is not clamatorial then that delicacy is a McAllen. fact12: That ixodid is not seminiferous. fact13: If the hireling snivels Pushkin then that transcendentalist is not juiceless and/or this person is not clamatorial. fact14: If the fact that something does abandon carful but it is not a kind of a wear is false then it is mononucleate. fact15: If some person transitivises psi and/or is inextensible then the fact that the person is not propagative is true. fact16: If the fact that that pier abandons carful and is mononucleate is wrong that abridger is not mononucleate. fact17: If that ixodid is non-mononucleate then this bedfellow is inextensible and reconnoitres Pyrolaceae. fact18: If that transcendentalist is not juiceless that delicacy is a McAllen. fact19: A McAllen is a Datura. fact20: If some person transitivises psi the fact that it is not inextensible and does not reconnoitre Pyrolaceae is false. fact21: That ixodid transitivises psi if that abridger is mononucleate. fact22: That ixodid is not propagative but major. | fact1: (¬{O}{i} & ¬{N}{i}) -> {N}{h} fact2: (x): ¬{B}x -> (¬{B}x & ¬{C}x) fact3: (¬{O}{i} & ¬{N}{i}) fact4: ¬{EN}{gh} -> (¬{EN}{gh} & ¬{FJ}{gh}) fact5: ¬{CI}{a} fact6: ¬(¬{I}{e} v {H}{e}) -> ¬{G}{d} fact7: ¬{G}{d} -> ¬({F}{c} & {D}{c}) fact8: (¬{AB}{cl} & ¬{FI}{cl}) fact9: (¬{AA}{bi} & ¬{EF}{bi}) -> ¬{IP}{bi} fact10: {J}{f} -> ¬(¬{I}{e} v {H}{e}) fact11: ¬{L}{g} -> {K}{f} fact12: ¬{HO}{a} fact13: {N}{h} -> (¬{M}{g} v ¬{L}{g}) fact14: (x): ¬({F}x & ¬{E}x) -> {D}x fact15: (x): ({A}x v {B}x) -> ¬{AA}x fact16: ¬({F}{c} & {D}{c}) -> ¬{D}{b} fact17: ¬{D}{a} -> ({B}{ij} & {C}{ij}) fact18: ¬{M}{g} -> {K}{f} fact19: (x): {K}x -> {J}x fact20: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{B}x & ¬{C}x) fact21: {D}{b} -> {A}{a} fact22: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) | [
"fact2 -> int1: If that ixodid is extensile he is non-extensile person that does not reconnoitre Pyrolaceae.;"
] | [
"fact2 -> int1: ¬{B}{a} -> (¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a});"
] | That that ixodid is non-inextensible person that does not reconnoitre Pyrolaceae is false. | ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) | [
"fact23 -> int2: If that ixodid transitivises psi the fact that that that ixodid is a kind of non-inextensible thing that does not reconnoitre Pyrolaceae is false is correct.; fact24 -> int3: That abridger is mononucleate if that that abridger abandons carful but it is not a wear does not hold.;"
] | 5 | 2 | null | 20 | 0 | 20 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If that boss is a kind of non-biped one that does not snivel Pushkin the hireling does snivel Pushkin. fact2: A non-inextensible person is inextensible person that does not reconnoitre Pyrolaceae. fact3: That boss is non-biped man that does not snivel Pushkin. fact4: That boxershorts is not a shocked and that is not neutral if the fact that that that is a shocked is wrong is not false. fact5: That ixodid is not Dickensian. fact6: If the fact that that indapamide does not bobble laparocele and/or he/she drives Dipogon does not hold this hominid is not biologistic. fact7: If this hominid is not biologistic that that pier abandons carful and is mononucleate is not right. fact8: The chloroform is a kind of major thing that is not a Gerreidae. fact9: That if that goldcrest is non-propagative and it does not ration entrancement then that goldcrest is not Celtic is right. fact10: That that indapamide does not bobble laparocele and/or that drives Dipogon is incorrect if that delicacy is a kind of a Datura. fact11: If that transcendentalist is not clamatorial then that delicacy is a McAllen. fact12: That ixodid is not seminiferous. fact13: If the hireling snivels Pushkin then that transcendentalist is not juiceless and/or this person is not clamatorial. fact14: If the fact that something does abandon carful but it is not a kind of a wear is false then it is mononucleate. fact15: If some person transitivises psi and/or is inextensible then the fact that the person is not propagative is true. fact16: If the fact that that pier abandons carful and is mononucleate is wrong that abridger is not mononucleate. fact17: If that ixodid is non-mononucleate then this bedfellow is inextensible and reconnoitres Pyrolaceae. fact18: If that transcendentalist is not juiceless that delicacy is a McAllen. fact19: A McAllen is a Datura. fact20: If some person transitivises psi the fact that it is not inextensible and does not reconnoitre Pyrolaceae is false. fact21: That ixodid transitivises psi if that abridger is mononucleate. fact22: That ixodid is not propagative but major. ; $hypothesis$ = That that ixodid is non-inextensible person that does not reconnoitre Pyrolaceae is false. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That snorkeling happens. | {C} | fact1: If that liberalness does not occurs this cashing fascination and that wise happens. fact2: The Michigan happens. fact3: That both this non-worstness and that tapering occurs does not hold if this cashing fascination happens. fact4: That this unstimulatingness does not happens is brought about by that the adaxialness happens and that aikido happens. fact5: That tapering does not occurs if that both this non-worstness and that tapering happens does not hold. fact6: That this separate happens is prevented by that that souring covertness happens and the backed occurs. fact7: That aikido happens and the cringing occurs. fact8: That stowing incredulity occurs. fact9: That tapering happens. fact10: If both the leptorhineness and the laicising occurs that beetling does not occurs. fact11: This Hippocraticness occurs. fact12: That continuing misquote does not occurs. fact13: If that cliquishness does not happens then both this non-liberalness and the backed occurs. fact14: The enfeeblement and that bullying perleche occurs. fact15: This thriving occurs. fact16: The equilibrizing Blastocladia does not occurs. fact17: If this thriving happens and that tapering happens then that snorkeling does not occurs. fact18: The spiriting battalion and the samsara occurs. fact19: That tactualness does not occurs. fact20: The fact that that stealing savor happens is true. fact21: If that tapering does not occurs that snorkeling and this thriving happens. | fact1: ¬{G} -> ({D} & {F}) fact2: {IQ} fact3: {D} -> ¬(¬{E} & {B}) fact4: ({BA} & {EM}) -> ¬{FO} fact5: ¬(¬{E} & {B}) -> ¬{B} fact6: ({AF} & {H}) -> ¬{Q} fact7: ({EM} & {HU}) fact8: {AC} fact9: {B} fact10: ({BD} & {AI}) -> ¬{AH} fact11: {IU} fact12: ¬{IB} fact13: ¬{I} -> (¬{G} & {H}) fact14: ({AO} & {FU}) fact15: {A} fact16: ¬{IH} fact17: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} fact18: ({BN} & {FL}) fact19: ¬{ER} fact20: {II} fact21: ¬{B} -> ({C} & {A}) | [
"fact15 & fact9 -> int1: This thriving and that tapering happens.; int1 & fact17 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact15 & fact9 -> int1: ({A} & {B}); int1 & fact17 -> hypothesis;"
] | That snorkeling happens. | {C} | [] | 9 | 2 | 2 | 18 | 0 | 18 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If that liberalness does not occurs this cashing fascination and that wise happens. fact2: The Michigan happens. fact3: That both this non-worstness and that tapering occurs does not hold if this cashing fascination happens. fact4: That this unstimulatingness does not happens is brought about by that the adaxialness happens and that aikido happens. fact5: That tapering does not occurs if that both this non-worstness and that tapering happens does not hold. fact6: That this separate happens is prevented by that that souring covertness happens and the backed occurs. fact7: That aikido happens and the cringing occurs. fact8: That stowing incredulity occurs. fact9: That tapering happens. fact10: If both the leptorhineness and the laicising occurs that beetling does not occurs. fact11: This Hippocraticness occurs. fact12: That continuing misquote does not occurs. fact13: If that cliquishness does not happens then both this non-liberalness and the backed occurs. fact14: The enfeeblement and that bullying perleche occurs. fact15: This thriving occurs. fact16: The equilibrizing Blastocladia does not occurs. fact17: If this thriving happens and that tapering happens then that snorkeling does not occurs. fact18: The spiriting battalion and the samsara occurs. fact19: That tactualness does not occurs. fact20: The fact that that stealing savor happens is true. fact21: If that tapering does not occurs that snorkeling and this thriving happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That snorkeling happens. ; $proof$ = | fact15 & fact9 -> int1: This thriving and that tapering happens.; int1 & fact17 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | This impoliticness occurs and that advertising tempered happens. | ({A} & {B}) | fact1: This undercoated and the sustaining Bittacidae happens. fact2: This cartoon happens. fact3: This telephonicness occurs and this impoliticness happens if that rising does not occurs. fact4: If that advertising tempered does not occurs then the Europocentricness occurs and this impoliticness happens. fact5: This catachresticness happens. fact6: That advertising tempered happens. fact7: The fact that both this impoliticness and that advertising tempered happens is wrong if that headlining transitivity does not happens. fact8: The angered occurs. fact9: That reunion happens. fact10: This impoliticness happens. fact11: That apotheosizing doh happens. fact12: If that that rising does not happens but that headlining transitivity happens is wrong then that headlining transitivity does not occurs. fact13: Both this sabotaging and that quartering Entolomataceae happens. fact14: That advertising tempered does not happens and that headlining transitivity does not happens if that muscling pharyngitis occurs. fact15: That this publishableness does not occurs causes that both that muscling pharyngitis and that rising occurs. fact16: If that non-tenderness and that migratoriness happens then this publishableness does not happens. fact17: Both the symptomaticness and the tintinnabulation happens. fact18: That photographicness and the allomerism happens. fact19: Both the pat and that colouration occurs. fact20: Both this armillariness and the antibiotic occurs. fact21: Both that non-tenderness and that migratoriness occurs if that euphemizing happens. | fact1: ({IT} & {O}) fact2: {CF} fact3: ¬{E} -> ({HO} & {A}) fact4: ¬{B} -> ({JI} & {A}) fact5: {CU} fact6: {B} fact7: ¬{C} -> ¬({A} & {B}) fact8: {AH} fact9: {GO} fact10: {A} fact11: {FE} fact12: ¬(¬{E} & {C}) -> ¬{C} fact13: ({GQ} & {AK}) fact14: {D} -> (¬{B} & ¬{C}) fact15: ¬{F} -> ({D} & {E}) fact16: (¬{G} & {H}) -> ¬{F} fact17: ({U} & {DT}) fact18: ({BO} & {FA}) fact19: ({BP} & {FU}) fact20: ({AP} & {IQ}) fact21: {I} -> (¬{G} & {H}) | [
"fact10 & fact6 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact10 & fact6 -> hypothesis;"
] | The Europocentricness happens. | {JI} | [] | 10 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 0 | 19 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: This undercoated and the sustaining Bittacidae happens. fact2: This cartoon happens. fact3: This telephonicness occurs and this impoliticness happens if that rising does not occurs. fact4: If that advertising tempered does not occurs then the Europocentricness occurs and this impoliticness happens. fact5: This catachresticness happens. fact6: That advertising tempered happens. fact7: The fact that both this impoliticness and that advertising tempered happens is wrong if that headlining transitivity does not happens. fact8: The angered occurs. fact9: That reunion happens. fact10: This impoliticness happens. fact11: That apotheosizing doh happens. fact12: If that that rising does not happens but that headlining transitivity happens is wrong then that headlining transitivity does not occurs. fact13: Both this sabotaging and that quartering Entolomataceae happens. fact14: That advertising tempered does not happens and that headlining transitivity does not happens if that muscling pharyngitis occurs. fact15: That this publishableness does not occurs causes that both that muscling pharyngitis and that rising occurs. fact16: If that non-tenderness and that migratoriness happens then this publishableness does not happens. fact17: Both the symptomaticness and the tintinnabulation happens. fact18: That photographicness and the allomerism happens. fact19: Both the pat and that colouration occurs. fact20: Both this armillariness and the antibiotic occurs. fact21: Both that non-tenderness and that migratoriness occurs if that euphemizing happens. ; $hypothesis$ = This impoliticness occurs and that advertising tempered happens. ; $proof$ = | fact10 & fact6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That stria is caesarean. | {B}{b} | fact1: That cambium is not burrlike or it broadens or both. fact2: That stria is not caesarean if that cambium broadens. | fact1: (¬{AA}{a} v {AB}{a}) fact2: {AB}{a} -> ¬{B}{b} | [] | [] | null | null | [] | null | 1 | null | 1 | 0 | 1 | UNKNOWN | null | UNKNOWN | null | $facts$ = fact1: That cambium is not burrlike or it broadens or both. fact2: That stria is not caesarean if that cambium broadens. ; $hypothesis$ = That stria is caesarean. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | The fact that this Gallus is a Ferrara does not hold. | ¬{C}{b} | fact1: This homemaker is unconstricted and does not rid SD. fact2: The fact that this homemaker is a curie but not a Spartium is not correct. fact3: This homemaker is a kind of a Timbuktu if the fact that this homemaker is a curie but this one is not a kind of a Spartium does not hold. fact4: If this homemaker yields and is a Timbuktu then this Gallus is not a Ferrara. fact5: If this homemaker is not constricted and does not rid SD then this homemaker yields. | fact1: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact2: ¬({D}{a} & ¬{E}{a}) fact3: ¬({D}{a} & ¬{E}{a}) -> {A}{a} fact4: ({B}{a} & {A}{a}) -> ¬{C}{b} fact5: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} | [
"fact5 & fact1 -> int1: This homemaker yields.; fact3 & fact2 -> int2: This homemaker is a Timbuktu.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This homemaker yields and that is a Timbuktu.; int3 & fact4 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact5 & fact1 -> int1: {B}{a}; fact3 & fact2 -> int2: {A}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ({B}{a} & {A}{a}); int3 & fact4 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: This homemaker is unconstricted and does not rid SD. fact2: The fact that this homemaker is a curie but not a Spartium is not correct. fact3: This homemaker is a kind of a Timbuktu if the fact that this homemaker is a curie but this one is not a kind of a Spartium does not hold. fact4: If this homemaker yields and is a Timbuktu then this Gallus is not a Ferrara. fact5: If this homemaker is not constricted and does not rid SD then this homemaker yields. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that this Gallus is a Ferrara does not hold. ; $proof$ = | fact5 & fact1 -> int1: This homemaker yields.; fact3 & fact2 -> int2: This homemaker is a Timbuktu.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This homemaker yields and that is a Timbuktu.; int3 & fact4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |