Datasets:

hitachi-nlp

/

FLD.v2.reimpl

like 0

0.3

That fetoprotein is not inculpatory.

¬{B}{c}

fact1: If that this richweed is a kind of a anarthria that befouls does not hold then this richweed is not a kind of a Entomophthoraceae. fact2: If this proboscidian is not Parthian then that that lefthander is not nonionic or is non-resinated or both does not hold. fact3: If the fact that the fact that this proboscidian is not nonionic or not resinated or both hold is false then that lefthander is not non-Parthian. fact4: That lefthander is not ionized if this proboscidian is not Parthian. fact5: The animalculum is not nonionic. fact6: That that lefthander is non-Parthian or the person is not inculpatory or both is wrong if that fetoprotein is not resinated. fact7: That fetoprotein is not inculpatory if this proboscidian is Parthian. fact8: That lefthander is unobtrusive. fact9: There exists none such that it is a anarthria and befouls. fact10: The fact that something is not a quintet and it is not a DPhil is wrong if the fact that it outstares free is not wrong. fact11: If that lefthander is not a Sciurus the fact that this proboscidian is not sisterly and that thing does not beget Caelum does not hold. fact12: Someone is Parthian if the fact that it is not sisterly and it does not beget Caelum is wrong. fact13: That lefthander is inculpatory if that either that fetoprotein is resinated or it is not nonionic or both is incorrect. fact14: That the fact that this proboscidian is not inculpatory and/or the person is non-Parthian hold is wrong if that fetoprotein is not nonionic. fact15: If that that isarithm does not sexualise overshot and it does not unfit is incorrect that lefthander does outstare free. fact16: If something does force that the thing does not sexualise overshot and does not unfit does not hold. fact17: That this proboscidian is not pudendal or not resinated or both does not hold. fact18: Something is not a Sciurus if the fact that this thing is not a quintet and is not a DPhil does not hold. fact19: If this richweed forces then that isarithm forces. fact20: That fetoprotein is inculpatory if the fact that that lefthander is not nonionic and/or is not resinated is false. fact21: The fact that that lefthander is not androgynous and/or it is not nonionic is false. fact22: If somebody is not a Entomophthoraceae then either it forces or it is a milepost or both. fact23: This proboscidian is not Parthian.

fact1: ¬({O}{e} & {N}{e}) -> ¬{L}{e} fact2: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} v ¬{AB}{b}) fact3: ¬(¬{AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) -> {A}{b} fact4: ¬{A}{a} -> {AA}{b} fact5: ¬{AA}{bh} fact6: ¬{AB}{c} -> ¬(¬{A}{b} v ¬{B}{b}) fact7: {A}{a} -> ¬{B}{c} fact8: {JD}{b} fact9: (x): ¬({O}x & {N}x) fact10: (x): {H}x -> ¬(¬{G}x & ¬{F}x) fact11: ¬{E}{b} -> ¬(¬{D}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) fact12: (x): ¬(¬{D}x & ¬{C}x) -> {A}x fact13: ¬({AB}{c} v ¬{AA}{c}) -> {B}{b} fact14: ¬{AA}{c} -> ¬(¬{B}{a} v ¬{A}{a}) fact15: ¬(¬{J}{d} & ¬{I}{d}) -> {H}{b} fact16: (x): {K}x -> ¬(¬{J}x & ¬{I}x) fact17: ¬(¬{ID}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) fact18: (x): ¬(¬{G}x & ¬{F}x) -> ¬{E}x fact19: {K}{e} -> {K}{d} fact20: ¬(¬{AA}{b} v ¬{AB}{b}) -> {B}{c} fact21: ¬(¬{AD}{b} v ¬{AA}{b}) fact22: (x): ¬{L}x -> ({K}x v {M}x) fact23: ¬{A}{a}

That fetoprotein is not inculpatory.

¬{B}{c}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that this richweed is a kind of a anarthria that befouls does not hold then this richweed is not a kind of a Entomophthoraceae. fact2: If this proboscidian is not Parthian then that that lefthander is not nonionic or is non-resinated or both does not hold. fact3: If the fact that the fact that this proboscidian is not nonionic or not resinated or both hold is false then that lefthander is not non-Parthian. fact4: That lefthander is not ionized if this proboscidian is not Parthian. fact5: The animalculum is not nonionic. fact6: That that lefthander is non-Parthian or the person is not inculpatory or both is wrong if that fetoprotein is not resinated. fact7: That fetoprotein is not inculpatory if this proboscidian is Parthian. fact8: That lefthander is unobtrusive. fact9: There exists none such that it is a anarthria and befouls. fact10: The fact that something is not a quintet and it is not a DPhil is wrong if the fact that it outstares free is not wrong. fact11: If that lefthander is not a Sciurus the fact that this proboscidian is not sisterly and that thing does not beget Caelum does not hold. fact12: Someone is Parthian if the fact that it is not sisterly and it does not beget Caelum is wrong. fact13: That lefthander is inculpatory if that either that fetoprotein is resinated or it is not nonionic or both is incorrect. fact14: That the fact that this proboscidian is not inculpatory and/or the person is non-Parthian hold is wrong if that fetoprotein is not nonionic. fact15: If that that isarithm does not sexualise overshot and it does not unfit is incorrect that lefthander does outstare free. fact16: If something does force that the thing does not sexualise overshot and does not unfit does not hold. fact17: That this proboscidian is not pudendal or not resinated or both does not hold. fact18: Something is not a Sciurus if the fact that this thing is not a quintet and is not a DPhil does not hold. fact19: If this richweed forces then that isarithm forces. fact20: That fetoprotein is inculpatory if the fact that that lefthander is not nonionic and/or is not resinated is false. fact21: The fact that that lefthander is not androgynous and/or it is not nonionic is false. fact22: If somebody is not a Entomophthoraceae then either it forces or it is a milepost or both. fact23: This proboscidian is not Parthian. ; $hypothesis$ = That fetoprotein is not inculpatory. ; $proof$ =

fact2 & fact23 -> int1: The fact that that lefthander is either not nonionic or not resinated or both is incorrect.; int1 & fact20 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This open is realistic but it does not ape lowered.

({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a})

fact1: Some person that is neural peoples Cicer and does not exist. fact2: If this open is not non-vulpecular that person is realistic and that person does not ape lowered. fact3: That if this bounder is vulpecular then that this open is realistic but it does not ape lowered is wrong is true. fact4: That tweezer is a Lagomorpha and not a Dubai. fact5: This open does not ape lowered. fact6: That laggard is realistic if this open is not realistic and that is not vulpecular. fact7: If this open is vulpecular then this open does not ape lowered. fact8: If some person does not exist that the one shaves and the one is adducent is not correct. fact9: This bounder is not adducent if that this aeroplane does shave and is adducent is not true. fact10: This aeroplane is neural if this neutralization is not a kind of a SLE and/or the one is not neural. fact11: The fact that this neutralization does not quintuple Endicott and is a SLE is incorrect. fact12: This open is a Iyyar but it is not a kind of a European. fact13: Someone is not realistic and that one is not vulpecular if that one is a fussiness. fact14: If the fact that this neutralization does not quintuple Endicott but he/she is a SLE does not hold then this neutralization is not a kind of a SLE. fact15: That some person is realistic and does not ape lowered is false if it is not vulpecular. fact16: Some person is a fussiness if it is adducent. fact17: This open is vulpecular. fact18: This open does shave if this bounder is neural and does not shave. fact19: This open does register if it is vulpecular. fact20: If Rebekah apes lowered it crabs myositis. fact21: If something is a fussiness it is vulpecular. fact22: This bazooka is a vowel but it does not unbind perspicaciousness.

fact1: (x): {G}x -> ({F}x & ¬{D}x) fact2: {A}{a} -> ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact3: {A}{b} -> ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact4: ({BR}{ag} & ¬{DD}{ag}) fact5: ¬{AB}{a} fact6: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) -> {AA}{ef} fact7: {A}{a} -> ¬{AB}{a} fact8: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬({E}x & {C}x) fact9: ¬({E}{c} & {C}{c}) -> ¬{C}{b} fact10: (¬{H}{d} v ¬{G}{d}) -> {G}{c} fact11: ¬(¬{I}{d} & {H}{d}) fact12: ({ES}{a} & ¬{GG}{a}) fact13: (x): {B}x -> (¬{AA}x & ¬{A}x) fact14: ¬(¬{I}{d} & {H}{d}) -> ¬{H}{d} fact15: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact16: (x): {C}x -> {B}x fact17: {A}{a} fact18: ({G}{b} & ¬{E}{b}) -> {E}{a} fact19: {A}{a} -> {BB}{a} fact20: {AB}{ht} -> {AJ}{ht} fact21: (x): {B}x -> {A}x fact22: ({FN}{gu} & ¬{IK}{gu})

The fact that this open is realistic but it does not ape lowered is false.

¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Some person that is neural peoples Cicer and does not exist. fact2: If this open is not non-vulpecular that person is realistic and that person does not ape lowered. fact3: That if this bounder is vulpecular then that this open is realistic but it does not ape lowered is wrong is true. fact4: That tweezer is a Lagomorpha and not a Dubai. fact5: This open does not ape lowered. fact6: That laggard is realistic if this open is not realistic and that is not vulpecular. fact7: If this open is vulpecular then this open does not ape lowered. fact8: If some person does not exist that the one shaves and the one is adducent is not correct. fact9: This bounder is not adducent if that this aeroplane does shave and is adducent is not true. fact10: This aeroplane is neural if this neutralization is not a kind of a SLE and/or the one is not neural. fact11: The fact that this neutralization does not quintuple Endicott and is a SLE is incorrect. fact12: This open is a Iyyar but it is not a kind of a European. fact13: Someone is not realistic and that one is not vulpecular if that one is a fussiness. fact14: If the fact that this neutralization does not quintuple Endicott but he/she is a SLE does not hold then this neutralization is not a kind of a SLE. fact15: That some person is realistic and does not ape lowered is false if it is not vulpecular. fact16: Some person is a fussiness if it is adducent. fact17: This open is vulpecular. fact18: This open does shave if this bounder is neural and does not shave. fact19: This open does register if it is vulpecular. fact20: If Rebekah apes lowered it crabs myositis. fact21: If something is a fussiness it is vulpecular. fact22: This bazooka is a vowel but it does not unbind perspicaciousness. ; $hypothesis$ = This open is realistic but it does not ape lowered. ; $proof$ =

fact2 & fact17 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That dyestuff does not aggress Astacura and is not an italic.

(¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a})

fact1: There exists something such that the fact that it is a beneficiary and non-neutering is false. fact2: Some man is not Scottish if that one does not spite Notoryctus and is a Omayyad. fact3: That dyestuff is not Scottish and this thing does not aggress Astacura. fact4: That dyestuff is not wiry. fact5: If that dyestuff is not a kind of an italic it is not an italic and it is not a parallelogram. fact6: The fact that either that complainant is not non-butyraceous or it is not providential or both does not hold if this forefather is not a kind of a beneficiary. fact7: That dyestuff is non-Scottish thing that does not relate Wynfrith if that dyestuff is non-Scottish. fact8: That dyestuff is not Scottish. fact9: If that complainant is a flaskful then this aegis spites Notoryctus. fact10: The hallucinogen does not aggress Astacura. fact11: Something does not aggress Astacura and it does not rail fashioned if it is Scottish. fact12: If that relations is not sacramental that relations is both not sacramental and not a Pseudechis. fact13: That dyestuff is not a coloured and is not Scottish. fact14: That complainant is a flaskful if the fact that it is butyraceous or it is not providential or both does not hold.

fact1: (Ex): ¬({I}x & ¬{J}x) fact2: (x): (¬{E}x & {D}x) -> ¬{A}x fact3: (¬{A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) fact4: ¬{CM}{a} fact5: ¬{C}{a} -> (¬{C}{a} & ¬{AH}{a}) fact6: ¬{I}{d} -> ¬({G}{c} v ¬{H}{c}) fact7: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{A}{a} & ¬{IG}{a}) fact8: ¬{A}{a} fact9: {F}{c} -> {E}{b} fact10: ¬{B}{j} fact11: (x): {A}x -> (¬{B}x & ¬{CN}x) fact12: ¬{EO}{ba} -> (¬{EO}{ba} & ¬{BM}{ba}) fact13: (¬{CF}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) fact14: ¬({G}{c} v ¬{H}{c}) -> {F}{c}

This cybernaut does not aggress Astacura and it does not rail fashioned.

(¬{B}{co} & ¬{CN}{co})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: There exists something such that the fact that it is a beneficiary and non-neutering is false. fact2: Some man is not Scottish if that one does not spite Notoryctus and is a Omayyad. fact3: That dyestuff is not Scottish and this thing does not aggress Astacura. fact4: That dyestuff is not wiry. fact5: If that dyestuff is not a kind of an italic it is not an italic and it is not a parallelogram. fact6: The fact that either that complainant is not non-butyraceous or it is not providential or both does not hold if this forefather is not a kind of a beneficiary. fact7: That dyestuff is non-Scottish thing that does not relate Wynfrith if that dyestuff is non-Scottish. fact8: That dyestuff is not Scottish. fact9: If that complainant is a flaskful then this aegis spites Notoryctus. fact10: The hallucinogen does not aggress Astacura. fact11: Something does not aggress Astacura and it does not rail fashioned if it is Scottish. fact12: If that relations is not sacramental that relations is both not sacramental and not a Pseudechis. fact13: That dyestuff is not a coloured and is not Scottish. fact14: That complainant is a flaskful if the fact that it is butyraceous or it is not providential or both does not hold. ; $hypothesis$ = That dyestuff does not aggress Astacura and is not an italic. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That Israelites is not a Anseriformes.

¬{A}{a}

fact1: If something is a levity then it is a blastoma. fact2: The fact that somebody is a mirthfulness but it does not comprise commonness does not hold if it is not amblyopic. fact3: If someone forecasts serenade then it is a Anseriformes. fact4: That Israelites does forecast serenade if that thing is a Maupassant and that thing is not chiliastic. fact5: Somebody is not a mirthfulness if the fact that this person is a mirthfulness and does not comprise commonness is false. fact6: If that Israelites is not a Maupassant but the person is chiliastic then that the person does forecast serenade is right. fact7: That Israelites is chiliastic if that Israelites is both annexal and not incomprehensive. fact8: That Israelites does not flounder and the one is not a abampere. fact9: The fact that that Israelites does not forecast serenade and it is not a kind of a Anseriformes if that prazosin is a mirthfulness is right. fact10: That Israelites is not areal and not a despisal. fact11: That Israelites does narrate Guadalcanal. fact12: That starship forecasts serenade. fact13: That Israelites is not a Maupassant and it is not chiliastic.

fact1: (x): {ER}x -> {AL}x fact2: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬({C}x & ¬{E}x) fact3: (x): {B}x -> {A}x fact4: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} fact5: (x): ¬({C}x & ¬{E}x) -> ¬{C}x fact6: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} fact7: ({EJ}{a} & ¬{EL}{a}) -> {AB}{a} fact8: (¬{N}{a} & ¬{FO}{a}) fact9: {C}{b} -> (¬{B}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) fact10: (¬{T}{a} & ¬{AN}{a}) fact11: {M}{a} fact12: {B}{bi} fact13: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a})

That Israelites is not a Anseriformes.

¬{A}{a}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If something is a levity then it is a blastoma. fact2: The fact that somebody is a mirthfulness but it does not comprise commonness does not hold if it is not amblyopic. fact3: If someone forecasts serenade then it is a Anseriformes. fact4: That Israelites does forecast serenade if that thing is a Maupassant and that thing is not chiliastic. fact5: Somebody is not a mirthfulness if the fact that this person is a mirthfulness and does not comprise commonness is false. fact6: If that Israelites is not a Maupassant but the person is chiliastic then that the person does forecast serenade is right. fact7: That Israelites is chiliastic if that Israelites is both annexal and not incomprehensive. fact8: That Israelites does not flounder and the one is not a abampere. fact9: The fact that that Israelites does not forecast serenade and it is not a kind of a Anseriformes if that prazosin is a mirthfulness is right. fact10: That Israelites is not areal and not a despisal. fact11: That Israelites does narrate Guadalcanal. fact12: That starship forecasts serenade. fact13: That Israelites is not a Maupassant and it is not chiliastic. ; $hypothesis$ = That Israelites is not a Anseriformes. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That that tracing happens and the tankage does not happens does not hold.

¬({C} & ¬{D})

fact1: If that that bleaching happens but that tracing does not occurs is incorrect that bleaching does not happens. fact2: That that bleaching does not happens triggers that that perineotomy occurs and this apostrophizing semicentennial happens. fact3: That the fact that notthe Majorness but that Hosting Waco occurs hold is not true if that Serbianness occurs. fact4: That contracting but notthe serialization happens if that geomorphologicness happens. fact5: That tracing but notthe tankage occurs if that tracing happens. fact6: The unhelpfulness happens. fact7: That geomorphologicness occurs if that that peeking does not happens and this rinse does not occurs is wrong. fact8: The tankage does not happens if the fact that either the tankage does not happens or that electoralness does not occurs or both is correct. fact9: The fact that that bleaching but notthat tracing occurs is false if the tankage does not occurs. fact10: Both that rafting and this non-doricness occurs. fact11: This apostrophizing semicentennial happens and that bleaching does not occurs. fact12: If the fact that this non-Majorness and that Hosting Waco occurs does not hold that electoralness does not happens. fact13: Both that Serbianness and this altercating compare happens if that dish does not happens. fact14: That tracing occurs if this apostrophizing semicentennial occurs. fact15: The fact that that that peeking does not occurs and this rinse does not occurs is right is wrong if this attributing grammar does not occurs. fact16: If the serialization does not happens notthat dish but this panting immovableness occurs. fact17: That surfing kor happens. fact18: That electoralness happens if that that Hosting Waco but notthe Majorness occurs is wrong. fact19: If this apostrophizing semicentennial does not happens that that tracing happens but the tankage does not happens does not hold.

fact1: ¬({B} & ¬{C}) -> ¬{B} fact2: ¬{B} -> ({JK} & {A}) fact3: {H} -> ¬(¬{F} & {G}) fact4: {N} -> ({M} & ¬{L}) fact5: {C} -> ({C} & ¬{D}) fact6: {GO} fact7: ¬(¬{O} & ¬{P}) -> {N} fact8: (¬{D} v ¬{E}) -> ¬{D} fact9: ¬{D} -> ¬({B} & ¬{C}) fact10: ({BE} & ¬{DL}) fact11: ({A} & ¬{B}) fact12: ¬(¬{F} & {G}) -> ¬{E} fact13: ¬{J} -> ({H} & {I}) fact14: {A} -> {C} fact15: ¬{Q} -> ¬(¬{O} & ¬{P}) fact16: ¬{L} -> (¬{J} & {K}) fact17: {EA} fact18: ¬({G} & ¬{F}) -> {E} fact19: ¬{A} -> ¬({C} & ¬{D})

That perineotomy occurs.

{JK}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that that bleaching happens but that tracing does not occurs is incorrect that bleaching does not happens. fact2: That that bleaching does not happens triggers that that perineotomy occurs and this apostrophizing semicentennial happens. fact3: That the fact that notthe Majorness but that Hosting Waco occurs hold is not true if that Serbianness occurs. fact4: That contracting but notthe serialization happens if that geomorphologicness happens. fact5: That tracing but notthe tankage occurs if that tracing happens. fact6: The unhelpfulness happens. fact7: That geomorphologicness occurs if that that peeking does not happens and this rinse does not occurs is wrong. fact8: The tankage does not happens if the fact that either the tankage does not happens or that electoralness does not occurs or both is correct. fact9: The fact that that bleaching but notthat tracing occurs is false if the tankage does not occurs. fact10: Both that rafting and this non-doricness occurs. fact11: This apostrophizing semicentennial happens and that bleaching does not occurs. fact12: If the fact that this non-Majorness and that Hosting Waco occurs does not hold that electoralness does not happens. fact13: Both that Serbianness and this altercating compare happens if that dish does not happens. fact14: That tracing occurs if this apostrophizing semicentennial occurs. fact15: The fact that that that peeking does not occurs and this rinse does not occurs is right is wrong if this attributing grammar does not occurs. fact16: If the serialization does not happens notthat dish but this panting immovableness occurs. fact17: That surfing kor happens. fact18: That electoralness happens if that that Hosting Waco but notthe Majorness occurs is wrong. fact19: If this apostrophizing semicentennial does not happens that that tracing happens but the tankage does not happens does not hold. ; $hypothesis$ = That that tracing happens and the tankage does not happens does not hold. ; $proof$ =

fact11 -> int1: This apostrophizing semicentennial happens.; int1 & fact14 -> int2: That tracing occurs.; int2 & fact5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That everything is topped is false.

¬((x): {A}x)

fact1: there is something such that if that this thing orders protanopia and this thing does not enroll creed is false this thing does not poach invoice.

fact1: fake_formula

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: there is something such that if that this thing orders protanopia and this thing does not enroll creed is false this thing does not poach invoice. ; $hypothesis$ = That everything is topped is false. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This forecastle reintroduces wanted.

{A}{a}

fact1: This haplosporidian is not excusable. fact2: If this soapstone does not lean Seriphus then either this soapstone is porous or it is erythropoietic or both. fact3: If that thermotropism leans Seriphus and it reprieves flakiness this plagiariser does not leans Seriphus. fact4: If somebody is erythropoietic then it is not a selfishness. fact5: If this haplosporidian stages then the fact that that funambulist is not a kind of a Polyborus and is not vacuolate does not hold. fact6: Something is not a selfishness if it is porous. fact7: Someone stages if the one either is not a Arp or stages or both. fact8: A quintet does not reintroduce wanted and is vertical. fact9: This forecastle is extensile. fact10: The comedian reintroduces wanted. fact11: If this haplosporidian is not excusable then it is not a Arp or stages or both. fact12: This forecastle is not a quintet if there exists something such that this is not a triskaidekaphobia and this is a Blephilia. fact13: This forecastle reintroduces wanted. fact14: This soapstone does not lean Seriphus if there exists something such that that does not lean Seriphus. fact15: If that something is both not a Polyborus and not vacuolate is incorrect then it is not filar. fact16: Guadalupe reintroduces wanted and is vertical if this forecastle is not a quintet. fact17: That thermotropism leans Seriphus and it reprieves flakiness if that funambulist is not filar. fact18: Some person is not a triskaidekaphobia but the one is a Blephilia if the one is not a selfishness. fact19: This manganite reintroduces wanted. fact20: that wanted reintroduces forecastle.

fact1: ¬{O}{f} fact2: ¬{I}{b} -> ({G}{b} v {H}{b}) fact3: ({I}{d} & {J}{d}) -> ¬{I}{c} fact4: (x): {H}x -> ¬{F}x fact5: {N}{f} -> ¬(¬{M}{e} & ¬{L}{e}) fact6: (x): {G}x -> ¬{F}x fact7: (x): (¬{P}x v {N}x) -> {N}x fact8: (x): {C}x -> (¬{A}x & {B}x) fact9: {FB}{a} fact10: {A}{u} fact11: ¬{O}{f} -> (¬{P}{f} v {N}{f}) fact12: (x): (¬{D}x & {E}x) -> ¬{C}{a} fact13: {A}{a} fact14: (x): ¬{I}x -> ¬{I}{b} fact15: (x): ¬(¬{M}x & ¬{L}x) -> ¬{K}x fact16: ¬{C}{a} -> ({A}{fn} & {B}{fn}) fact17: ¬{K}{e} -> ({I}{d} & {J}{d}) fact18: (x): ¬{F}x -> (¬{D}x & {E}x) fact19: {A}{dm} fact20: {AA}{aa}

This forecastle does not reintroduce wanted.

¬{A}{a}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This haplosporidian is not excusable. fact2: If this soapstone does not lean Seriphus then either this soapstone is porous or it is erythropoietic or both. fact3: If that thermotropism leans Seriphus and it reprieves flakiness this plagiariser does not leans Seriphus. fact4: If somebody is erythropoietic then it is not a selfishness. fact5: If this haplosporidian stages then the fact that that funambulist is not a kind of a Polyborus and is not vacuolate does not hold. fact6: Something is not a selfishness if it is porous. fact7: Someone stages if the one either is not a Arp or stages or both. fact8: A quintet does not reintroduce wanted and is vertical. fact9: This forecastle is extensile. fact10: The comedian reintroduces wanted. fact11: If this haplosporidian is not excusable then it is not a Arp or stages or both. fact12: This forecastle is not a quintet if there exists something such that this is not a triskaidekaphobia and this is a Blephilia. fact13: This forecastle reintroduces wanted. fact14: This soapstone does not lean Seriphus if there exists something such that that does not lean Seriphus. fact15: If that something is both not a Polyborus and not vacuolate is incorrect then it is not filar. fact16: Guadalupe reintroduces wanted and is vertical if this forecastle is not a quintet. fact17: That thermotropism leans Seriphus and it reprieves flakiness if that funambulist is not filar. fact18: Some person is not a triskaidekaphobia but the one is a Blephilia if the one is not a selfishness. fact19: This manganite reintroduces wanted. fact20: that wanted reintroduces forecastle. ; $hypothesis$ = This forecastle reintroduces wanted. ; $proof$ =

fact13 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That that breech is both not a range and a Gastrophryne is false.

¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a})

fact1: If that breech does not allure it is a Gastrophryne. fact2: Some man does not rollick boiled if the fact that she rollick boiled and she is not ammonitic does not hold. fact3: That breech is a kind of a Gastrophryne. fact4: That breech does not allure. fact5: The wetnurse does not allure. fact6: If that petticoat allures the fact that that breech is both not a range and a Gastrophryne is wrong. fact7: That that breech is not a range but a Gastrophryne if that breech does not allure is not incorrect. fact8: If something is ammonitic the fact that it allures hold.

fact1: ¬{A}{a} -> {AB}{a} fact2: (x): ¬({DC}x & ¬{B}x) -> ¬{DC}x fact3: {AB}{a} fact4: ¬{A}{a} fact5: ¬{A}{ac} fact6: {A}{b} -> ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact7: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact8: (x): {B}x -> {A}x

That breech is a kind of non-microsomal thing that rollicks boiled.

(¬{AE}{a} & {DC}{a})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that breech does not allure it is a Gastrophryne. fact2: Some man does not rollick boiled if the fact that she rollick boiled and she is not ammonitic does not hold. fact3: That breech is a kind of a Gastrophryne. fact4: That breech does not allure. fact5: The wetnurse does not allure. fact6: If that petticoat allures the fact that that breech is both not a range and a Gastrophryne is wrong. fact7: That that breech is not a range but a Gastrophryne if that breech does not allure is not incorrect. fact8: If something is ammonitic the fact that it allures hold. ; $hypothesis$ = That that breech is both not a range and a Gastrophryne is false. ; $proof$ =

fact7 & fact4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This ninja is thermal.

¬{AA}{aa}

fact1: If some person is not a kind of a Asteridae it does not camp GATT. fact2: If that cheek is thermal and a Asteridae this ninja is thermal. fact3: This ninja is both not a Asteridae and even. fact4: This ninja does not camp GATT. fact5: If this ninja is not a Asteridae then that one does not camp GATT. fact6: If some man is not a Asteridae then it is not nonthermal and it does not camp GATT. fact7: This ninja is even.

fact1: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬{AB}x fact2: (¬{AA}{a} & {A}{a}) -> {AA}{aa} fact3: (¬{A}{aa} & {B}{aa}) fact4: ¬{AB}{aa} fact5: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬{AB}{aa} fact6: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact7: {B}{aa}

This ninja is nonthermal.

{AA}{aa}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If some person is not a kind of a Asteridae it does not camp GATT. fact2: If that cheek is thermal and a Asteridae this ninja is thermal. fact3: This ninja is both not a Asteridae and even. fact4: This ninja does not camp GATT. fact5: If this ninja is not a Asteridae then that one does not camp GATT. fact6: If some man is not a Asteridae then it is not nonthermal and it does not camp GATT. fact7: This ninja is even. ; $hypothesis$ = This ninja is thermal. ; $proof$ =

fact6 -> int1: This ninja is thermal thing that does not camp GATT if that thing is not a Asteridae.; fact3 -> int2: This ninja is not a Asteridae.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This ninja is non-nonthermal person that does not camp GATT.; int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That that beeline does not confide Iliamna but it is asclepiadaceous does not hold.

¬(¬{B}{d} & {C}{d})

fact1: That that beeline confides Iliamna and it is asclepiadaceous does not hold. fact2: If the fact that that hull is not asclepiadaceous and it is not a toss is incorrect this deamination is asclepiadaceous. fact3: If this elater does not confide Iliamna then that the fact that that beeline does not confide Iliamna and is asclepiadaceous is wrong is right. fact4: This elater does not confide Iliamna if that that hull is alive and that is axonal does not hold. fact5: If that hull is non-longitudinal that that hull is not asclepiadaceous and it is not a toss is wrong. fact6: If something is not chiasmal then the fact that it is a standard that is not non-axonal does not hold. fact7: The fact that that hull is alive and is axonal is incorrect if this phrontistery is not chiasmal. fact8: That beeline does not confide Iliamna if the fact that this phrontistery is asclepiadaceous and this person is chiasmal does not hold. fact9: If this phrontistery confides Iliamna this deamination does confides Iliamna. fact10: If that that that hull is both longitudinal and non-Elizabethan is false is right that hull is not longitudinal. fact11: If that hull is not axonal then this elater does not confide Iliamna. fact12: If something that confides Iliamna is asclepiadaceous that is not chiasmal. fact13: That that raceway does manoeuvre loneliness and this one demeans does not hold. fact14: That if something does not replay psychokinesis that confides Iliamna and is underhanded is right. fact15: If either this phrontistery is not underhanded or it is chiasmal or both that beeline is chiasmal. fact16: If somebody is chiasmal then that person does not confide Iliamna and that person is asclepiadaceous. fact17: The fact that this phrontistery is not underhanded is correct if that that hull is a toss or that person is underhanded or both is not true.

fact1: ¬({B}{d} & {C}{d}) fact2: ¬(¬{C}{b} & ¬{F}{b}) -> {C}{hr} fact3: ¬{B}{c} -> ¬(¬{B}{d} & {C}{d}) fact4: ¬({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) -> ¬{B}{c} fact5: ¬{G}{b} -> ¬(¬{C}{b} & ¬{F}{b}) fact6: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({IS}x & {AB}x) fact7: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact8: ¬({C}{a} & {A}{a}) -> ¬{B}{d} fact9: {B}{a} -> {B}{hr} fact10: ¬({G}{b} & ¬{H}{b}) -> ¬{G}{b} fact11: ¬{AB}{b} -> ¬{B}{c} fact12: (x): ({B}x & {C}x) -> ¬{A}x fact13: ¬({IC}{dp} & {HI}{dp}) fact14: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({B}x & {D}x) fact15: (¬{D}{a} v {A}{a}) -> {A}{d} fact16: (x): {A}x -> (¬{B}x & {C}x) fact17: ¬({F}{b} v {D}{b}) -> ¬{D}{a}

The fact that this deamination is a standard that is axonal is incorrect.

¬({IS}{hr} & {AB}{hr})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That that beeline confides Iliamna and it is asclepiadaceous does not hold. fact2: If the fact that that hull is not asclepiadaceous and it is not a toss is incorrect this deamination is asclepiadaceous. fact3: If this elater does not confide Iliamna then that the fact that that beeline does not confide Iliamna and is asclepiadaceous is wrong is right. fact4: This elater does not confide Iliamna if that that hull is alive and that is axonal does not hold. fact5: If that hull is non-longitudinal that that hull is not asclepiadaceous and it is not a toss is wrong. fact6: If something is not chiasmal then the fact that it is a standard that is not non-axonal does not hold. fact7: The fact that that hull is alive and is axonal is incorrect if this phrontistery is not chiasmal. fact8: That beeline does not confide Iliamna if the fact that this phrontistery is asclepiadaceous and this person is chiasmal does not hold. fact9: If this phrontistery confides Iliamna this deamination does confides Iliamna. fact10: If that that that hull is both longitudinal and non-Elizabethan is false is right that hull is not longitudinal. fact11: If that hull is not axonal then this elater does not confide Iliamna. fact12: If something that confides Iliamna is asclepiadaceous that is not chiasmal. fact13: That that raceway does manoeuvre loneliness and this one demeans does not hold. fact14: That if something does not replay psychokinesis that confides Iliamna and is underhanded is right. fact15: If either this phrontistery is not underhanded or it is chiasmal or both that beeline is chiasmal. fact16: If somebody is chiasmal then that person does not confide Iliamna and that person is asclepiadaceous. fact17: The fact that this phrontistery is not underhanded is correct if that that hull is a toss or that person is underhanded or both is not true. ; $hypothesis$ = That that beeline does not confide Iliamna but it is asclepiadaceous does not hold. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

The fact that that this scintilla is beakless but that one is not hypovolemic is not true is true.

¬({C}{b} & ¬{B}{b})

fact1: This bigos is both a Cannes and hypovolemic. fact2: If this bigos is hypovolemic then this scintilla is beakless but the person is not hypovolemic.

fact1: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact2: {B}{a} -> ({C}{b} & ¬{B}{b})

DISPROVED

DISPROVED

$facts$ = fact1: This bigos is both a Cannes and hypovolemic. fact2: If this bigos is hypovolemic then this scintilla is beakless but the person is not hypovolemic. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that this scintilla is beakless but that one is not hypovolemic is not true is true. ; $proof$ =

fact1 -> int1: This bigos is hypovolemic.; int1 & fact2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That Harrison owes Phthirus but it is non-pericardiac is incorrect.

¬({A}{b} & ¬{C}{b})

fact1: If that something does not owe Phthirus is right then the fact that this is a centered and this is not streptococcic is wrong. fact2: This undertaker is not non-urceolate if that this undertaker slams Leibniz but it is not streptococcic does not hold. fact3: If something is not unhappy it is both a diocesan and urceolate. fact4: Something is not unhappy if that it does not pith extrados and is unhappy does not hold. fact5: Some person is not tractable. fact6: If this undertaker is not non-urceolate then Harrison owes Phthirus and is not pericardiac. fact7: That if something is non-urceolate then the fact that it does owe Phthirus and is not pericardiac is false is correct. fact8: The fact that this undertaker owes Phthirus and this is urceolate is false. fact9: Harrison is not urceolate if this undertaker is a diocesan that is not urceolate. fact10: The fact that the fact that some person does not pith extrados and is unhappy is true is not true if it is a signed.

fact1: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({BH}x & ¬{AB}x) fact2: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} fact3: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({E}x & {B}x) fact4: (x): ¬(¬{F}x & {D}x) -> ¬{D}x fact5: (Ex): ¬{H}x fact6: {B}{a} -> ({A}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) fact7: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬({A}x & ¬{C}x) fact8: ¬({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact9: ({E}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact10: (x): {G}x -> ¬(¬{F}x & {D}x)

The fact that that hachure is a centered but it is not streptococcic is incorrect.

¬({BH}{ej} & ¬{AB}{ej})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that something does not owe Phthirus is right then the fact that this is a centered and this is not streptococcic is wrong. fact2: This undertaker is not non-urceolate if that this undertaker slams Leibniz but it is not streptococcic does not hold. fact3: If something is not unhappy it is both a diocesan and urceolate. fact4: Something is not unhappy if that it does not pith extrados and is unhappy does not hold. fact5: Some person is not tractable. fact6: If this undertaker is not non-urceolate then Harrison owes Phthirus and is not pericardiac. fact7: That if something is non-urceolate then the fact that it does owe Phthirus and is not pericardiac is false is correct. fact8: The fact that this undertaker owes Phthirus and this is urceolate is false. fact9: Harrison is not urceolate if this undertaker is a diocesan that is not urceolate. fact10: The fact that the fact that some person does not pith extrados and is unhappy is true is not true if it is a signed. ; $hypothesis$ = That Harrison owes Phthirus but it is non-pericardiac is incorrect. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This cutout is not a deficiency.

¬{B}{b}

fact1: This cutout does not boob kraurosis if that lapboard is not unreconcilable. fact2: The fact that either that lapboard overcharges NOAA or that one is angiomatous or both is correct if that one does not boob kraurosis. fact3: That lapboard is not a curled. fact4: That lapboard is a deficiency if this cutout is not non-angiomatous. fact5: If this cutout is not a kind of a deficiency this cutout overcharges NOAA and/or this person is angiomatous. fact6: If that lapboard is angiomatous then this cutout is a deficiency. fact7: That lapboard does not boob kraurosis. fact8: This cutout is impolitic. fact9: This loon does boob kraurosis. fact10: If that lapboard is a kind of a deficiency this cutout overcharges NOAA. fact11: This cutout is angiomatous. fact12: That lapboard is a deficiency if this cutout overcharges NOAA. fact13: This cutout is a deficiency if that lapboard does overcharge NOAA. fact14: that kraurosis does not boob lapboard.

fact1: ¬{C}{a} -> ¬{A}{b} fact2: ¬{A}{a} -> ({AA}{a} v {AB}{a}) fact3: ¬{AS}{a} fact4: {AB}{b} -> {B}{a} fact5: ¬{B}{b} -> ({AA}{b} v {AB}{b}) fact6: {AB}{a} -> {B}{b} fact7: ¬{A}{a} fact8: {EQ}{b} fact9: {A}{eo} fact10: {B}{a} -> {AA}{b} fact11: {AB}{b} fact12: {AA}{b} -> {B}{a} fact13: {AA}{a} -> {B}{b} fact14: ¬{AC}{aa}

This cutout is not a deficiency.

¬{B}{b}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This cutout does not boob kraurosis if that lapboard is not unreconcilable. fact2: The fact that either that lapboard overcharges NOAA or that one is angiomatous or both is correct if that one does not boob kraurosis. fact3: That lapboard is not a curled. fact4: That lapboard is a deficiency if this cutout is not non-angiomatous. fact5: If this cutout is not a kind of a deficiency this cutout overcharges NOAA and/or this person is angiomatous. fact6: If that lapboard is angiomatous then this cutout is a deficiency. fact7: That lapboard does not boob kraurosis. fact8: This cutout is impolitic. fact9: This loon does boob kraurosis. fact10: If that lapboard is a kind of a deficiency this cutout overcharges NOAA. fact11: This cutout is angiomatous. fact12: That lapboard is a deficiency if this cutout overcharges NOAA. fact13: This cutout is a deficiency if that lapboard does overcharge NOAA. fact14: that kraurosis does not boob lapboard. ; $hypothesis$ = This cutout is not a deficiency. ; $proof$ =

fact2 & fact7 -> int1: Either that lapboard overcharges NOAA or it is angiomatous or both.; int1 & fact13 & fact6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That leafage is a docility.

{D}{a}

fact1: That leafage occurs if the person is anaerobiotic person that does not foreshow Baldr. fact2: That leafage is a kind of anaerobiotic thing that does not foreshow Baldr. fact3: That leafage is non-downstair. fact4: If the fact that that leafage occurs and that person disfranchises pesewa is true then that person is not a docility. fact5: That leafage antiques. fact6: That leafage is a seventh. fact7: That leafage does disfranchise pesewa and is a clavus. fact8: This raper is not a clavus. fact9: If that joint is a kind of untraveled one that does not accost Rachycentron then that joint is a debt. fact10: That leafage is a kind of a clavus. fact11: That leafage does not foreshow Baldr. fact12: The colewort is not a clavus.

fact1: ({F}{a} & ¬{E}{a}) -> {C}{a} fact2: ({F}{a} & ¬{E}{a}) fact3: ¬{BB}{a} fact4: ({C}{a} & {A}{a}) -> ¬{D}{a} fact5: {BU}{a} fact6: {DM}{a} fact7: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact8: ¬{B}{gg} fact9: ({EE}{db} & ¬{GS}{db}) -> {GP}{db} fact10: {B}{a} fact11: ¬{E}{a} fact12: ¬{B}{da}

DISPROVED

DISPROVED

$facts$ = fact1: That leafage occurs if the person is anaerobiotic person that does not foreshow Baldr. fact2: That leafage is a kind of anaerobiotic thing that does not foreshow Baldr. fact3: That leafage is non-downstair. fact4: If the fact that that leafage occurs and that person disfranchises pesewa is true then that person is not a docility. fact5: That leafage antiques. fact6: That leafage is a seventh. fact7: That leafage does disfranchise pesewa and is a clavus. fact8: This raper is not a clavus. fact9: If that joint is a kind of untraveled one that does not accost Rachycentron then that joint is a debt. fact10: That leafage is a kind of a clavus. fact11: That leafage does not foreshow Baldr. fact12: The colewort is not a clavus. ; $hypothesis$ = That leafage is a docility. ; $proof$ =

fact7 -> int1: That leafage disfranchises pesewa.; fact2 & fact1 -> int2: That leafage occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That leafage occurs and it disfranchises pesewa.; int3 & fact4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That this orchis is a kind of a like and does not perspire Apennines does not hold.

¬({E}{c} & ¬{C}{c})

fact1: Something is a dieting that is not peritoneal if it does not perspire Apennines. fact2: Luciana is a dieting if this liberalist perspires Apennines and is not a like. fact3: Luciana is nominative if the fact that Luciana is a secondary hold. fact4: Something does not perspire Apennines but it is nuclear if it is anadromous. fact5: Someone is a like if that she/he is not a kind of a dieting and she/he is peritoneal is wrong. fact6: This liberalist is not peritoneal. fact7: Something is not fundamentalistic and it is not untreated if it is not androgenous. fact8: This liberalist is not anadromous but he/she is nuclear if Luciana is not shiny. fact9: This liberalist is a dieting. fact10: This liberalist is not androgenous if the fact that that precursor is both not an orderly and not androgenous is wrong. fact11: If this orchis criticises and is not easy Luciana is not shiny. fact12: If some man is not fundamentalistic that person is a like and/or that person does not perspire Apennines. fact13: This orchis does not criticise if the fact that either it is a kind of a Megadermatidae or it is not easy or both does not hold. fact14: The fact that this orchis is a Megadermatidae or it is not easy or both is incorrect if the fact that Luciana is unrenewed does not hold. fact15: If something does not criticise then that is anadromous and that is shiny. fact16: Luciana is a kind of a secondary if Luciana is not a screech. fact17: The fact that this orchis is a kind of a like and perspires Apennines does not hold. fact18: If something that is not anadromous is nuclear the thing is not fundamentalistic. fact19: If something is nominative then the thing is non-unrenewed thing that is nonalcoholic. fact20: This orchis is peritoneal if this liberalist is a dieting but it does not perspire Apennines. fact21: Luciana perspires Apennines if this liberalist is a dieting but that thing is not peritoneal. fact22: If this liberalist is not fundamentalistic that this orchis is not a dieting but he/she is peritoneal is wrong. fact23: That plyer is peritoneal.

fact1: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x & ¬{B}x) fact2: ({C}{a} & ¬{E}{a}) -> {A}{b} fact3: {Q}{b} -> {P}{b} fact4: (x): {G}x -> (¬{C}x & {F}x) fact5: (x): ¬(¬{A}x & {B}x) -> {E}x fact6: ¬{B}{a} fact7: (x): ¬{N}x -> (¬{D}x & ¬{L}x) fact8: ¬{H}{b} -> (¬{G}{a} & {F}{a}) fact9: {A}{a} fact10: ¬(¬{S}{d} & ¬{N}{d}) -> ¬{N}{a} fact11: ({I}{c} & ¬{J}{c}) -> ¬{H}{b} fact12: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({E}x v ¬{C}x) fact13: ¬({K}{c} v ¬{J}{c}) -> ¬{I}{c} fact14: ¬{M}{b} -> ¬({K}{c} v ¬{J}{c}) fact15: (x): ¬{I}x -> ({G}x & {H}x) fact16: ¬{R}{b} -> {Q}{b} fact17: ¬({E}{c} & {C}{c}) fact18: (x): (¬{G}x & {F}x) -> ¬{D}x fact19: (x): {P}x -> (¬{M}x & {O}x) fact20: ({A}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> {B}{c} fact21: ({A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> {C}{b} fact22: ¬{D}{a} -> ¬(¬{A}{c} & {B}{c}) fact23: {B}{gn}

This attachment is not peritoneal.

¬{B}{be}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Something is a dieting that is not peritoneal if it does not perspire Apennines. fact2: Luciana is a dieting if this liberalist perspires Apennines and is not a like. fact3: Luciana is nominative if the fact that Luciana is a secondary hold. fact4: Something does not perspire Apennines but it is nuclear if it is anadromous. fact5: Someone is a like if that she/he is not a kind of a dieting and she/he is peritoneal is wrong. fact6: This liberalist is not peritoneal. fact7: Something is not fundamentalistic and it is not untreated if it is not androgenous. fact8: This liberalist is not anadromous but he/she is nuclear if Luciana is not shiny. fact9: This liberalist is a dieting. fact10: This liberalist is not androgenous if the fact that that precursor is both not an orderly and not androgenous is wrong. fact11: If this orchis criticises and is not easy Luciana is not shiny. fact12: If some man is not fundamentalistic that person is a like and/or that person does not perspire Apennines. fact13: This orchis does not criticise if the fact that either it is a kind of a Megadermatidae or it is not easy or both does not hold. fact14: The fact that this orchis is a Megadermatidae or it is not easy or both is incorrect if the fact that Luciana is unrenewed does not hold. fact15: If something does not criticise then that is anadromous and that is shiny. fact16: Luciana is a kind of a secondary if Luciana is not a screech. fact17: The fact that this orchis is a kind of a like and perspires Apennines does not hold. fact18: If something that is not anadromous is nuclear the thing is not fundamentalistic. fact19: If something is nominative then the thing is non-unrenewed thing that is nonalcoholic. fact20: This orchis is peritoneal if this liberalist is a dieting but it does not perspire Apennines. fact21: Luciana perspires Apennines if this liberalist is a dieting but that thing is not peritoneal. fact22: If this liberalist is not fundamentalistic that this orchis is not a dieting but he/she is peritoneal is wrong. fact23: That plyer is peritoneal. ; $hypothesis$ = That this orchis is a kind of a like and does not perspire Apennines does not hold. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That buffaloing Gerridae does not happens.

¬{C}

fact1: If that sepaloidness occurs and this tergiversation happens then this vomiting Chlorophyceae does not occurs. fact2: This clean but notthat classicalness occurs if this athletics does not occurs. fact3: That buffaloing Gerridae is prevented by that this pencilling ERA occurs and that classicalness happens. fact4: That classicalness occurs. fact5: The fact that that buffaloing Gerridae does not occurs and this pencilling ERA does not occurs is incorrect if that classicalness does not happens. fact6: The taunt occurs.

fact1: ({CT} & {GT}) -> ¬{CM} fact2: ¬{E} -> ({D} & ¬{B}) fact3: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} fact4: {B} fact5: ¬{B} -> ¬(¬{C} & ¬{A}) fact6: {CQ}

That buffaloing Gerridae happens.

{C}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that sepaloidness occurs and this tergiversation happens then this vomiting Chlorophyceae does not occurs. fact2: This clean but notthat classicalness occurs if this athletics does not occurs. fact3: That buffaloing Gerridae is prevented by that this pencilling ERA occurs and that classicalness happens. fact4: That classicalness occurs. fact5: The fact that that buffaloing Gerridae does not occurs and this pencilling ERA does not occurs is incorrect if that classicalness does not happens. fact6: The taunt occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That buffaloing Gerridae does not happens. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That plum happens.

{B}

fact1: The Vesper occurs or this snitching Siphonaptera happens or both. fact2: If that capacitating cacodaemon occurs that altering Mashriq does not happens. fact3: If the fact that that that recording does not occurs but that hijab occurs is incorrect is right then this freeness does not occurs. fact4: If that altering Mashriq does not occurs that penileness happens and this artiodactylness occurs. fact5: If that egocentricness does not happens then that capacitating cacodaemon and that belittling Pluteaceae occurs. fact6: Either that citrousness or that palatialness or both happens. fact7: This impetus happens but that maturedness does not occurs if this artiodactylness occurs. fact8: If the fact that that superannuating respectfulness but notthe conspiring happens does not hold then this prostration occurs. fact9: That this rattling does not happens but that egocentricness occurs does not hold if this freeness does not happens. fact10: If this leafing reversibility does not occurs then the Katariness happens or this mulct occurs or both. fact11: That this prodigality happens prevents that this porcelainizing Begoniaceae happens. fact12: If both this porcelainizing Begoniaceae and that plum occurs then that this leafing reversibility does not occurs hold. fact13: That that recording does not happens but that hijab occurs is false if this prostration happens. fact14: That plum is prevented by that either that citrousness happens or that palatialness occurs or both. fact15: If that that palatialness but notthe communicating happens is incorrect then that citrousness does not happens. fact16: That egocentricness does not happens if the fact that the fact that this rattling does not happens and that egocentricness occurs is correct does not hold. fact17: The fact that that superannuating respectfulness but notthe conspiring occurs is incorrect if that peek does not happens. fact18: If that citrousness does not happens then that peek does not happens and/or this unencumberedness does not occurs. fact19: That that peek does not happens is triggered by that that peek does not occurs and/or this unencumberedness does not happens. fact20: This prodigality occurs if this impetus occurs. fact21: Both that plum and this leafing reversibility happens if that this porcelainizing Begoniaceae does not occurs is right. fact22: That plum does not occurs if that citrousness occurs.

fact1: ({BU} v {CL}) fact2: {J} -> ¬{I} fact3: ¬(¬{O} & {P}) -> ¬{M} fact4: ¬{I} -> ({H} & {G}) fact5: ¬{L} -> ({J} & {K}) fact6: ({AA} v {AB}) fact7: {G} -> ({E} & ¬{F}) fact8: ¬({S} & ¬{R}) -> {Q} fact9: ¬{M} -> ¬(¬{N} & {L}) fact10: ¬{A} -> ({FG} v {CT}) fact11: {D} -> ¬{C} fact12: ({C} & {B}) -> ¬{A} fact13: {Q} -> ¬(¬{O} & {P}) fact14: ({AA} v {AB}) -> ¬{B} fact15: ¬({AB} & ¬{AC}) -> ¬{AA} fact16: ¬(¬{N} & {L}) -> ¬{L} fact17: ¬{T} -> ¬({S} & ¬{R}) fact18: ¬{AA} -> (¬{T} v ¬{U}) fact19: (¬{T} v ¬{U}) -> ¬{T} fact20: {E} -> {D} fact21: ¬{C} -> ({B} & {A}) fact22: {AA} -> ¬{B}

The Katariness or this mulct or both occurs.

({FG} v {CT})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The Vesper occurs or this snitching Siphonaptera happens or both. fact2: If that capacitating cacodaemon occurs that altering Mashriq does not happens. fact3: If the fact that that that recording does not occurs but that hijab occurs is incorrect is right then this freeness does not occurs. fact4: If that altering Mashriq does not occurs that penileness happens and this artiodactylness occurs. fact5: If that egocentricness does not happens then that capacitating cacodaemon and that belittling Pluteaceae occurs. fact6: Either that citrousness or that palatialness or both happens. fact7: This impetus happens but that maturedness does not occurs if this artiodactylness occurs. fact8: If the fact that that superannuating respectfulness but notthe conspiring happens does not hold then this prostration occurs. fact9: That this rattling does not happens but that egocentricness occurs does not hold if this freeness does not happens. fact10: If this leafing reversibility does not occurs then the Katariness happens or this mulct occurs or both. fact11: That this prodigality happens prevents that this porcelainizing Begoniaceae happens. fact12: If both this porcelainizing Begoniaceae and that plum occurs then that this leafing reversibility does not occurs hold. fact13: That that recording does not happens but that hijab occurs is false if this prostration happens. fact14: That plum is prevented by that either that citrousness happens or that palatialness occurs or both. fact15: If that that palatialness but notthe communicating happens is incorrect then that citrousness does not happens. fact16: That egocentricness does not happens if the fact that the fact that this rattling does not happens and that egocentricness occurs is correct does not hold. fact17: The fact that that superannuating respectfulness but notthe conspiring occurs is incorrect if that peek does not happens. fact18: If that citrousness does not happens then that peek does not happens and/or this unencumberedness does not occurs. fact19: That that peek does not happens is triggered by that that peek does not occurs and/or this unencumberedness does not happens. fact20: This prodigality occurs if this impetus occurs. fact21: Both that plum and this leafing reversibility happens if that this porcelainizing Begoniaceae does not occurs is right. fact22: That plum does not occurs if that citrousness occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That plum happens. ; $proof$ =

fact14 & fact6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This empyrean is pneumococcal.

{B}{b}

fact1: Some person is a kind of a praenomen and the person is pneumococcal if the person does not cook. fact2: The fact that someone does not upraise companionableness and is a kind of a more is incorrect if it is insatiate. fact3: The superstructure is non-International. fact4: That aguacate is a praenomen and it is thoracic if this Zairese does not flummox Mossad. fact5: If that that consumption is a Lepadidae is right then this empyrean is pneumococcal. fact6: Either that consumption cooks or it is not pneumococcal or both if the celom is a kind of a praenomen. fact7: If that something is phrenological and it is a Selenarctos is incorrect that it is not a Selenarctos hold. fact8: This empyrean is pneumococcal if the fact that that consumption is not a Lepadidae but it is motorless does not hold. fact9: The fact that that consumption is not a Lepadidae but motorless is not right. fact10: That consumption is not thoracic. fact11: The fact that that consumption is a Lepadidae and motorless is false. fact12: This empyrean is not pneumococcal if that consumption cooks and/or that person is pneumococcal. fact13: If the superstructure is non-International then the fact that Will is not non-phrenological but a Selenarctos is incorrect. fact14: That inessential is not satiate but a peopled if Will is not a kind of a Selenarctos. fact15: If that aguacate is a kind of a praenomen then the celom is a kind of a praenomen. fact16: If something is a kind of a praenomen that it is a Lepadidae hold.

fact1: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x & {B}x) fact2: (x): {H}x -> ¬(¬{G}x & {F}x) fact3: ¬{K}{h} fact4: ¬{E}{e} -> ({A}{d} & {D}{d}) fact5: {AA}{a} -> {B}{b} fact6: {A}{c} -> ({C}{a} v ¬{B}{a}) fact7: (x): ¬({L}x & {J}x) -> ¬{J}x fact8: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} fact9: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact10: ¬{D}{a} fact11: ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact12: ({C}{a} v ¬{B}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact13: ¬{K}{h} -> ¬({L}{g} & {J}{g}) fact14: ¬{J}{g} -> ({H}{f} & {I}{f}) fact15: {A}{d} -> {A}{c} fact16: (x): {A}x -> {AA}x

The fact that this acetamide is a Lepadidae is correct.

{AA}{ep}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Some person is a kind of a praenomen and the person is pneumococcal if the person does not cook. fact2: The fact that someone does not upraise companionableness and is a kind of a more is incorrect if it is insatiate. fact3: The superstructure is non-International. fact4: That aguacate is a praenomen and it is thoracic if this Zairese does not flummox Mossad. fact5: If that that consumption is a Lepadidae is right then this empyrean is pneumococcal. fact6: Either that consumption cooks or it is not pneumococcal or both if the celom is a kind of a praenomen. fact7: If that something is phrenological and it is a Selenarctos is incorrect that it is not a Selenarctos hold. fact8: This empyrean is pneumococcal if the fact that that consumption is not a Lepadidae but it is motorless does not hold. fact9: The fact that that consumption is not a Lepadidae but motorless is not right. fact10: That consumption is not thoracic. fact11: The fact that that consumption is a Lepadidae and motorless is false. fact12: This empyrean is not pneumococcal if that consumption cooks and/or that person is pneumococcal. fact13: If the superstructure is non-International then the fact that Will is not non-phrenological but a Selenarctos is incorrect. fact14: That inessential is not satiate but a peopled if Will is not a kind of a Selenarctos. fact15: If that aguacate is a kind of a praenomen then the celom is a kind of a praenomen. fact16: If something is a kind of a praenomen that it is a Lepadidae hold. ; $hypothesis$ = This empyrean is pneumococcal. ; $proof$ =

fact8 & fact9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That both this sevens and this pic occurs is incorrect.

¬({A} & {B})

fact1: This pic occurs. fact2: That that hunting pretrial happens and this sevens happens is brought about by that this pic does not occurs. fact3: That that prying fortitude and this chimericness happens yields that this baseball does not occurs. fact4: If this baseball does not occurs the fact that both this sevens and this pic happens is incorrect. fact5: The unrhymedness happens and this tasting possessed occurs.

fact1: {B} fact2: ¬{B} -> ({L} & {A}) fact3: ({E} & {D}) -> ¬{C} fact4: ¬{C} -> ¬({A} & {B}) fact5: ({DD} & {H})

That both this sevens and this pic occurs is incorrect.

¬({A} & {B})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This pic occurs. fact2: That that hunting pretrial happens and this sevens happens is brought about by that this pic does not occurs. fact3: That that prying fortitude and this chimericness happens yields that this baseball does not occurs. fact4: If this baseball does not occurs the fact that both this sevens and this pic happens is incorrect. fact5: The unrhymedness happens and this tasting possessed occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That both this sevens and this pic occurs is incorrect. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

The fact that everybody mesmerizes Usuli does not hold.

¬((x): {A}x)

fact1: Some man that is harsh is not a Danish. fact2: Everyone is a kind of an acute. fact3: Everything is not inactive. fact4: Everyone fixes and it does not beshrew Brecht. fact5: Everybody is a quid. fact6: Everything is unprincipled. fact7: Everything is baroque. fact8: Everything is a duskiness. fact9: Something is a kind of a Urochordata that is not splintery if it does not beshrew Brecht. fact10: Something is harsh if that thing is a Urochordata and that thing is not splintery. fact11: Everything is a kind of an ache. fact12: Every man is dormant. fact13: Everything is brimless. fact14: Everybody is lowborn. fact15: Everything does Wake blanketed. fact16: Everybody is a Suisse.

fact1: (x): {C}x -> ¬{B}x fact2: (x): {EP}x fact3: (x): {DG}x fact4: (x): ({G}x & ¬{F}x) fact5: (x): {BP}x fact6: (x): {CF}x fact7: (x): {L}x fact8: (x): {AB}x fact9: (x): ¬{F}x -> ({D}x & ¬{E}x) fact10: (x): ({D}x & ¬{E}x) -> {C}x fact11: (x): {AT}x fact12: (x): {HU}x fact13: (x): {AD}x fact14: (x): {AA}x fact15: (x): {CI}x fact16: (x): {CE}x

Every man is a Naiadales.

(x): {JI}x

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Some man that is harsh is not a Danish. fact2: Everyone is a kind of an acute. fact3: Everything is not inactive. fact4: Everyone fixes and it does not beshrew Brecht. fact5: Everybody is a quid. fact6: Everything is unprincipled. fact7: Everything is baroque. fact8: Everything is a duskiness. fact9: Something is a kind of a Urochordata that is not splintery if it does not beshrew Brecht. fact10: Something is harsh if that thing is a Urochordata and that thing is not splintery. fact11: Everything is a kind of an ache. fact12: Every man is dormant. fact13: Everything is brimless. fact14: Everybody is lowborn. fact15: Everything does Wake blanketed. fact16: Everybody is a Suisse. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that everybody mesmerizes Usuli does not hold. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

The fact that this selflessness and this telling archidiaconate happens does not hold.

¬({A} & {B})

fact1: That seining Saponaria occurs and that unlovingness happens. fact2: That this does not occurs if the fact that this needlework and the do occurs is wrong is right. fact3: That either this undomesticness does not occurs or this assignment occurs or both is caused by that that contumacy does not happens. fact4: That this telling archidiaconate occurs is true. fact5: The fact that that bishopry and that exclusion happens is wrong if that this does not occurs hold. fact6: If this non-undomesticness and/or this assignment occurs then this undomesticness does not happens. fact7: That this pilotage does not occurs results in that the abbreviating mutualism occurs and this selflessness does not happens. fact8: If the fact that this pilotage does not happens is right that both this selflessness and this telling archidiaconate occurs is not true. fact9: That that peek happens and that contumacy does not occurs is triggered by that the prepositionalness does not occurs. fact10: If the fact that that bishopry occurs and that exclusion occurs is wrong then this pilotage does not happens. fact11: This selflessness occurs. fact12: This pilotage does not happens if the fact that both this non-undomesticness and that bishopry happens is wrong.

fact1: ({EA} & {GR}) fact2: ¬({J} & {H}) -> ¬{H} fact3: ¬{I} -> (¬{D} v {G}) fact4: {B} fact5: ¬{H} -> ¬({E} & {F}) fact6: (¬{D} v {G}) -> ¬{D} fact7: ¬{C} -> ({FO} & ¬{A}) fact8: ¬{C} -> ¬({A} & {B}) fact9: ¬{L} -> ({K} & ¬{I}) fact10: ¬({E} & {F}) -> ¬{C} fact11: {A} fact12: ¬(¬{D} & {E}) -> ¬{C}

The fact that this selflessness and this telling archidiaconate happens does not hold.

¬({A} & {B})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That seining Saponaria occurs and that unlovingness happens. fact2: That this does not occurs if the fact that this needlework and the do occurs is wrong is right. fact3: That either this undomesticness does not occurs or this assignment occurs or both is caused by that that contumacy does not happens. fact4: That this telling archidiaconate occurs is true. fact5: The fact that that bishopry and that exclusion happens is wrong if that this does not occurs hold. fact6: If this non-undomesticness and/or this assignment occurs then this undomesticness does not happens. fact7: That this pilotage does not occurs results in that the abbreviating mutualism occurs and this selflessness does not happens. fact8: If the fact that this pilotage does not happens is right that both this selflessness and this telling archidiaconate occurs is not true. fact9: That that peek happens and that contumacy does not occurs is triggered by that the prepositionalness does not occurs. fact10: If the fact that that bishopry occurs and that exclusion occurs is wrong then this pilotage does not happens. fact11: This selflessness occurs. fact12: This pilotage does not happens if the fact that both this non-undomesticness and that bishopry happens is wrong. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that this selflessness and this telling archidiaconate happens does not hold. ; $proof$ =

fact11 & fact4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This apoptosis is not deistic.

¬{A}{a}

fact1: If this photogravure is a randomness then that this photogravure is deistic but it is not a Heyward is incorrect. fact2: That this apoptosis is a kind of a Bartramia that is not a noticed is incorrect. fact3: The input is a baiza and non-connotative. fact4: If this apoptosis is deistic then the fact that that babu whimpers but this person is not a squashed is right. fact5: That that babu is a Corylopsis but it is not deistic is not right. fact6: If there exists something such that that thing is a Bartramia this palomino is a kind of a Bartramia but that thing is not a placard. fact7: The fact that something is not a Bartramia but unpalatable is incorrect if the thing is extrasensory. fact8: That babu is a kind of a Bartramia. fact9: If that babu is a Bartramia then the fact that that babu whimpers and is not a kind of a squashed does not hold. fact10: That babu whimpers. fact11: The fact that someone is not a Abkhaz and the one is palatable is incorrect if the one is a kind of a Necturus. fact12: Something is a Necturus if the thing is a transactinide. fact13: If that this apoptosis is a squashed is correct then that this apoptosis is deistic but the person is not a Bartramia is false. fact14: If the fact that that aloes is not a kind of a Abkhaz and the one is not unpalatable does not hold that babu is extrasensory. fact15: Something is deistic if that that is both a Corylopsis and not deistic is false. fact16: If this apoptosis is not non-deistic then that babu whimpers. fact17: That babu is not a doctorspeak. fact18: This apoptosis is a kind of a Bartramia if something is deistic and is extrasensory. fact19: This apoptosis is a Bartramia if that babu is extrasensory. fact20: If some man is a Bartramia it is deistic. fact21: This apoptosis is a squashed. fact22: If this apoptosis whimpers that babu is a Bartramia and is not deistic.

fact1: {JC}{ft} -> ¬({A}{ft} & ¬{JJ}{ft}) fact2: ¬({B}{a} & ¬{DP}{a}) fact3: ({EQ}{dt} & ¬{CN}{dt}) fact4: {A}{a} -> ({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact5: ¬({H}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) fact6: (x): {B}x -> ({B}{in} & ¬{AU}{in}) fact7: (x): {C}x -> ¬(¬{B}x & {D}x) fact8: {B}{b} fact9: {B}{b} -> ¬({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact10: {AA}{b} fact11: (x): {F}x -> ¬(¬{E}x & ¬{D}x) fact12: (x): {G}x -> {F}x fact13: {AB}{a} -> ¬({A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) fact14: ¬(¬{E}{c} & ¬{D}{c}) -> {C}{b} fact15: (x): ¬({H}x & ¬{A}x) -> {A}x fact16: {A}{a} -> {AA}{b} fact17: ¬{FB}{b} fact18: (x): ({A}x & {C}x) -> {B}{a} fact19: {C}{b} -> {B}{a} fact20: (x): {B}x -> {A}x fact21: {AB}{a} fact22: {AA}{a} -> ({B}{b} & ¬{A}{b})

Let's assume that that this apoptosis is not non-deistic is correct.

{A}{a}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this photogravure is a randomness then that this photogravure is deistic but it is not a Heyward is incorrect. fact2: That this apoptosis is a kind of a Bartramia that is not a noticed is incorrect. fact3: The input is a baiza and non-connotative. fact4: If this apoptosis is deistic then the fact that that babu whimpers but this person is not a squashed is right. fact5: That that babu is a Corylopsis but it is not deistic is not right. fact6: If there exists something such that that thing is a Bartramia this palomino is a kind of a Bartramia but that thing is not a placard. fact7: The fact that something is not a Bartramia but unpalatable is incorrect if the thing is extrasensory. fact8: That babu is a kind of a Bartramia. fact9: If that babu is a Bartramia then the fact that that babu whimpers and is not a kind of a squashed does not hold. fact10: That babu whimpers. fact11: The fact that someone is not a Abkhaz and the one is palatable is incorrect if the one is a kind of a Necturus. fact12: Something is a Necturus if the thing is a transactinide. fact13: If that this apoptosis is a squashed is correct then that this apoptosis is deistic but the person is not a Bartramia is false. fact14: If the fact that that aloes is not a kind of a Abkhaz and the one is not unpalatable does not hold that babu is extrasensory. fact15: Something is deistic if that that is both a Corylopsis and not deistic is false. fact16: If this apoptosis is not non-deistic then that babu whimpers. fact17: That babu is not a doctorspeak. fact18: This apoptosis is a kind of a Bartramia if something is deistic and is extrasensory. fact19: This apoptosis is a Bartramia if that babu is extrasensory. fact20: If some man is a Bartramia it is deistic. fact21: This apoptosis is a squashed. fact22: If this apoptosis whimpers that babu is a Bartramia and is not deistic. ; $hypothesis$ = This apoptosis is not deistic. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that that this apoptosis is not non-deistic is correct.; fact4 & assump1 -> int1: That babu whimpers but it is not a squashed.; fact9 & fact8 -> int2: The fact that that babu whimpers but he is not a kind of a squashed is not true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

The fact that either this chronologicalness happens or that washup occurs or both is incorrect.

¬({A} v {B})

fact1: That this McCarthyism does not happens brings about that that hieing satori occurs and this noncommissionedness occurs. fact2: If the fact that that zapping Smalley does not occurs and that maternalism occurs is false then that washup happens. fact3: Both the institutionalizedness and this concussing reluctivity happens if that hieing satori occurs. fact4: That both this non-chronologicalness and the retiring dysarthria occurs is caused by that that washup does not happens. fact5: The fact that this noninstitutionalisedness does not occurs and that mitsvah does not happens is incorrect if the fact that this insubordination does not occurs hold. fact6: If the fact that that indication occurs or that surviving intangibleness does not happens or both is incorrect then this McCarthyism does not happens. fact7: That that zapping Smalley does not happens but that maternalism occurs is false. fact8: That this chronologicalness occurs or that washup occurs or both is incorrect if this repeal does not happens. fact9: If either that mitsvah happens or this repeal does not happens or both that washup does not occurs. fact10: That this twanging does not occurs is caused by that the decimalization happens and this centesis happens. fact11: The fact that that mitsvah and this insubordination occurs does not hold if this noninstitutionalisedness does not occurs. fact12: The fact that that hieing satori happens and this concussing reluctivity happens is incorrect if this noncommissionedness does not happens. fact13: This insubordination does not happens if that that that hieing satori occurs and this concussing reluctivity occurs is wrong is true. fact14: If this twanging does not happens the fact that that indication occurs and/or that surviving intangibleness does not occurs is incorrect. fact15: If that this noninstitutionalisedness does not occurs and that mitsvah does not happens is wrong then that mitsvah happens.

fact1: ¬{J} -> ({H} & {I}) fact2: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) -> {B} fact3: {H} -> (¬{F} & {G}) fact4: ¬{B} -> (¬{A} & {FB}) fact5: ¬{E} -> ¬(¬{F} & ¬{D}) fact6: ¬({K} v ¬{L}) -> ¬{J} fact7: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) fact8: ¬{C} -> ¬({A} v {B}) fact9: ({D} v ¬{C}) -> ¬{B} fact10: ({O} & {N}) -> ¬{M} fact11: ¬{F} -> ¬({D} & {E}) fact12: ¬{I} -> ¬({H} & {G}) fact13: ¬({H} & {G}) -> ¬{E} fact14: ¬{M} -> ¬({K} v ¬{L}) fact15: ¬(¬{F} & ¬{D}) -> {D}

The fact that either this chronologicalness happens or that washup occurs or both is incorrect.

¬({A} v {B})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That this McCarthyism does not happens brings about that that hieing satori occurs and this noncommissionedness occurs. fact2: If the fact that that zapping Smalley does not occurs and that maternalism occurs is false then that washup happens. fact3: Both the institutionalizedness and this concussing reluctivity happens if that hieing satori occurs. fact4: That both this non-chronologicalness and the retiring dysarthria occurs is caused by that that washup does not happens. fact5: The fact that this noninstitutionalisedness does not occurs and that mitsvah does not happens is incorrect if the fact that this insubordination does not occurs hold. fact6: If the fact that that indication occurs or that surviving intangibleness does not happens or both is incorrect then this McCarthyism does not happens. fact7: That that zapping Smalley does not happens but that maternalism occurs is false. fact8: That this chronologicalness occurs or that washup occurs or both is incorrect if this repeal does not happens. fact9: If either that mitsvah happens or this repeal does not happens or both that washup does not occurs. fact10: That this twanging does not occurs is caused by that the decimalization happens and this centesis happens. fact11: The fact that that mitsvah and this insubordination occurs does not hold if this noninstitutionalisedness does not occurs. fact12: The fact that that hieing satori happens and this concussing reluctivity happens is incorrect if this noncommissionedness does not happens. fact13: This insubordination does not happens if that that that hieing satori occurs and this concussing reluctivity occurs is wrong is true. fact14: If this twanging does not happens the fact that that indication occurs and/or that surviving intangibleness does not occurs is incorrect. fact15: If that this noninstitutionalisedness does not occurs and that mitsvah does not happens is wrong then that mitsvah happens. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that either this chronologicalness happens or that washup occurs or both is incorrect. ; $proof$ =

fact2 & fact7 -> int1: That washup occurs.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

There is something such that if the fact that it is not a holonym and it does not sequester is incorrect then it does shake Secale.

(Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x

fact1: That there exists something such that if that it is non-Episcopalian thing that is not Kyrgyzstani is incorrect it skittleses eared hold. fact2: If that Charlene is not a holonym and does not sequester does not hold the fact that that thing shakes Secale is true. fact3: If that mestranol poaches lawlessness then that one reinvigorateds deliciousness. fact4: If the fact that that Charlene is a holonym but he/she does not sequester is false hold he/she shakes Secale. fact5: The fact that if Charlene is not a holonym and does not sequester then Charlene shakes Secale is true.

fact1: (Ex): ¬(¬{AJ}x & ¬{AD}x) -> {GO}x fact2: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} fact3: {FB}{bn} -> {AL}{bn} fact4: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} fact5: (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa}

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: That there exists something such that if that it is non-Episcopalian thing that is not Kyrgyzstani is incorrect it skittleses eared hold. fact2: If that Charlene is not a holonym and does not sequester does not hold the fact that that thing shakes Secale is true. fact3: If that mestranol poaches lawlessness then that one reinvigorateds deliciousness. fact4: If the fact that that Charlene is a holonym but he/she does not sequester is false hold he/she shakes Secale. fact5: The fact that if Charlene is not a holonym and does not sequester then Charlene shakes Secale is true. ; $hypothesis$ = There is something such that if the fact that it is not a holonym and it does not sequester is incorrect then it does shake Secale. ; $proof$ =

fact2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

Let's assume that Jodie is anoestrous.

{A}{a}

fact1: That Jodie is not a kind of a Chamaecyparis but she/he is anoestrous does not hold. fact2: If Jodie is anoestrous the fact that this neighbor does not steam aspergillosis and is a kind of a Chamaecyparis is false. fact3: That that woodscrew engages is right. fact4: This neighbor is not anoestrous if that woodscrew is anoestrous and/or engages. fact5: If that that middle is not a Epictetus but that is ungrammatical does not hold then that is ungrammatical. fact6: That woodscrew is anoestrous and it is a Microchiroptera if that middle is not ungrammatical. fact7: If the fact that this neighbor is not a Atropidae hold then Jodie is non-anoestrous but it engages. fact8: If that woodscrew does engage this neighbor does not steam aspergillosis and is a Chamaecyparis. fact9: Jodie is anoestrous if this neighbor is a kind of anoestrous thing that is not a Atropidae. fact10: If Jodie is anoestrous then the fact that the fact that this neighbor does steam aspergillosis and that thing is a kind of a Chamaecyparis is wrong is correct.

fact1: ¬(¬{AB}{a} & {A}{a}) fact2: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact3: {B}{c} fact4: ({A}{c} v {B}{c}) -> ¬{A}{b} fact5: ¬(¬{G}{d} & {E}{d}) -> ¬{E}{d} fact6: ¬{E}{d} -> ({A}{c} & {D}{c}) fact7: ¬{C}{b} -> (¬{A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact8: {B}{c} -> (¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact9: (¬{A}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) -> {A}{a} fact10: {A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{b} & {AB}{b})

Jodie engages.

{B}{a}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That Jodie is not a kind of a Chamaecyparis but she/he is anoestrous does not hold. fact2: If Jodie is anoestrous the fact that this neighbor does not steam aspergillosis and is a kind of a Chamaecyparis is false. fact3: That that woodscrew engages is right. fact4: This neighbor is not anoestrous if that woodscrew is anoestrous and/or engages. fact5: If that that middle is not a Epictetus but that is ungrammatical does not hold then that is ungrammatical. fact6: That woodscrew is anoestrous and it is a Microchiroptera if that middle is not ungrammatical. fact7: If the fact that this neighbor is not a Atropidae hold then Jodie is non-anoestrous but it engages. fact8: If that woodscrew does engage this neighbor does not steam aspergillosis and is a Chamaecyparis. fact9: Jodie is anoestrous if this neighbor is a kind of anoestrous thing that is not a Atropidae. fact10: If Jodie is anoestrous then the fact that the fact that this neighbor does steam aspergillosis and that thing is a kind of a Chamaecyparis is wrong is correct. ; $hypothesis$ = Let's assume that Jodie is anoestrous. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that Jodie is anoestrous.; fact2 & assump1 -> int1: The fact that this neighbor does not steam aspergillosis and is a Chamaecyparis is incorrect.; fact8 & fact3 -> int2: This neighbor does not steam aspergillosis and is a Chamaecyparis.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This broadcasting does not happens.

¬{D}

fact1: That climax does not occurs if the fact that that knifing and the racism happens is true. fact2: The shallowness occurs. fact3: This fixing does not happens if the rumour and the Belarusianness occurs. fact4: That pantheistness and this rustication happens. fact5: This rheologicness happens. fact6: If this rustication does not happens both that pantheistness and this broadcasting happens. fact7: That pyroelectricity happens. fact8: This broadcasting does not happens if both this rustication and this attainder occurs.

fact1: ({IJ} & {HE}) -> ¬{JA} fact2: {BR} fact3: ({L} & {GR}) -> ¬{EG} fact4: ({A} & {B}) fact5: {HK} fact6: ¬{B} -> ({A} & {D}) fact7: {IT} fact8: ({B} & {C}) -> ¬{D}

This broadcasting happens.

{D}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That climax does not occurs if the fact that that knifing and the racism happens is true. fact2: The shallowness occurs. fact3: This fixing does not happens if the rumour and the Belarusianness occurs. fact4: That pantheistness and this rustication happens. fact5: This rheologicness happens. fact6: If this rustication does not happens both that pantheistness and this broadcasting happens. fact7: That pyroelectricity happens. fact8: This broadcasting does not happens if both this rustication and this attainder occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = This broadcasting does not happens. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That that distension does not occurs hold.

¬{B}

fact1: The charades does not happens. fact2: If the fact that this countessing Pontos occurs but that attempt does not occurs is not correct this countessing Pontos does not occurs. fact3: That this hajj does not occurs is prevented by that that rolling revisionism occurs. fact4: That accelerating etymology brings about that that playacting Ascaris does not happens and/or the presocraticness does not happens. fact5: That drying does not occurs if that parochialness occurs. fact6: That flanking Philohela does not happens. fact7: If that woodiness happens then this adorning does not happens and/or that cornered does not happens. fact8: That distension does not occurs if that flanking Philohela does not occurs. fact9: That that distension and that flanking Philohela occurs is caused by that that decaffeinating Lofoten does not happens. fact10: That that remunerating does not happens triggers that both that woodiness and this internationalization occurs. fact11: That that drying does not occurs causes that that decaffeinating Lofoten and that distension occurs. fact12: That that this countessing Pontos happens and that attempt does not occurs is false hold if this hajj happens. fact13: That accelerating etymology occurs. fact14: That this countessing Pontos does not happens brings about that that patellarness and that parochialness occurs. fact15: That that playacting Ascaris does not happens and/or that the presocraticness does not occurs results in that that remunerating does not happens.

fact1: ¬{GT} fact2: ¬({G} & ¬{I}) -> ¬{G} fact3: {J} -> {H} fact4: {R} -> (¬{P} v ¬{Q}) fact5: {E} -> ¬{D} fact6: ¬{A} fact7: {M} -> (¬{L} v ¬{K}) fact8: ¬{A} -> ¬{B} fact9: ¬{C} -> ({B} & {A}) fact10: ¬{O} -> ({M} & {N}) fact11: ¬{D} -> ({C} & {B}) fact12: {H} -> ¬({G} & ¬{I}) fact13: {R} fact14: ¬{G} -> ({F} & {E}) fact15: (¬{P} v ¬{Q}) -> ¬{O}

That distension occurs.

{B}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The charades does not happens. fact2: If the fact that this countessing Pontos occurs but that attempt does not occurs is not correct this countessing Pontos does not occurs. fact3: That this hajj does not occurs is prevented by that that rolling revisionism occurs. fact4: That accelerating etymology brings about that that playacting Ascaris does not happens and/or the presocraticness does not happens. fact5: That drying does not occurs if that parochialness occurs. fact6: That flanking Philohela does not happens. fact7: If that woodiness happens then this adorning does not happens and/or that cornered does not happens. fact8: That distension does not occurs if that flanking Philohela does not occurs. fact9: That that distension and that flanking Philohela occurs is caused by that that decaffeinating Lofoten does not happens. fact10: That that remunerating does not happens triggers that both that woodiness and this internationalization occurs. fact11: That that drying does not occurs causes that that decaffeinating Lofoten and that distension occurs. fact12: That that this countessing Pontos happens and that attempt does not occurs is false hold if this hajj happens. fact13: That accelerating etymology occurs. fact14: That this countessing Pontos does not happens brings about that that patellarness and that parochialness occurs. fact15: That that playacting Ascaris does not happens and/or that the presocraticness does not occurs results in that that remunerating does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That that distension does not occurs hold. ; $proof$ =

fact8 & fact6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

There exists something such that if that is not a kind of a Thelypteridaceae then that is a kind of non-tamer thing that is not non-exergonic.

(Ex): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x & {AB}x)

fact1: Something is not a kind of a Genoa but it is a Eustoma if it is not a Caucasian. fact2: There is some man such that if it is not a Thelypteridaceae then it is tamer and it is exergonic. fact3: Some person does not avalanche CLI but the one is a Millikan if the one is not a trifling. fact4: There is something such that if it is a Thelypteridaceae then it is not tamer and is exergonic. fact5: Something is not tamer and not non-exergonic if it is a Thelypteridaceae. fact6: That acetanilid is exergonic if she/he is not a Thelypteridaceae. fact7: There is some person such that if she is not unendowed she is non-hemorrhagic person that shatters Aepyceros. fact8: That acetanilid is a kind of non-tamer thing that is not non-exergonic if that acetanilid is a Thelypteridaceae. fact9: Something is both not tamer and exergonic if this is not a Thelypteridaceae. fact10: Some man does not mesmerize and is a Marsilea if it is not a kind of a courting. fact11: If that acetanilid is not a Thelypteridaceae that acetanilid is tamer and the one is exergonic. fact12: There is something such that if that is not a kind of a Thelypteridaceae that is exergonic. fact13: There is something such that if that thing is not a Thelypteridaceae that thing is not tamer.

fact1: (x): ¬{HF}x -> (¬{IB}x & {C}x) fact2: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> ({AA}x & {AB}x) fact3: (x): ¬{CC}x -> (¬{H}x & {DJ}x) fact4: (Ex): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) fact5: (x): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) fact6: ¬{A}{aa} -> {AB}{aa} fact7: (Ex): ¬{BP}x -> (¬{F}x & {BA}x) fact8: {A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) fact9: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) fact10: (x): ¬{J}x -> (¬{FP}x & {BB}x) fact11: ¬{A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) fact12: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> {AB}x fact13: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> ¬{AA}x

There is some man such that if this one is not a trifling this one does not avalanche CLI and is a Millikan.

(Ex): ¬{CC}x -> (¬{H}x & {DJ}x)

PROVED

PROVED

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: Something is not a kind of a Genoa but it is a Eustoma if it is not a Caucasian. fact2: There is some man such that if it is not a Thelypteridaceae then it is tamer and it is exergonic. fact3: Some person does not avalanche CLI but the one is a Millikan if the one is not a trifling. fact4: There is something such that if it is a Thelypteridaceae then it is not tamer and is exergonic. fact5: Something is not tamer and not non-exergonic if it is a Thelypteridaceae. fact6: That acetanilid is exergonic if she/he is not a Thelypteridaceae. fact7: There is some person such that if she is not unendowed she is non-hemorrhagic person that shatters Aepyceros. fact8: That acetanilid is a kind of non-tamer thing that is not non-exergonic if that acetanilid is a Thelypteridaceae. fact9: Something is both not tamer and exergonic if this is not a Thelypteridaceae. fact10: Some man does not mesmerize and is a Marsilea if it is not a kind of a courting. fact11: If that acetanilid is not a Thelypteridaceae that acetanilid is tamer and the one is exergonic. fact12: There is something such that if that is not a kind of a Thelypteridaceae that is exergonic. fact13: There is something such that if that thing is not a Thelypteridaceae that thing is not tamer. ; $hypothesis$ = There exists something such that if that is not a kind of a Thelypteridaceae then that is a kind of non-tamer thing that is not non-exergonic. ; $proof$ =

fact9 -> int1: If that acetanilid is not a Thelypteridaceae then it is a kind of non-tamer one that is exergonic.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

Let's assume that this lather does not nut Tilletiaceae.

¬{A}{a}

fact1: Something that does not frisk Yalta is a debauch. fact2: Every man is a kind of a Calvinism and/or nuts Tilletiaceae. fact3: That that Ru does not mist dyscalculia or this one is a kind of a Calvinism or both is wrong if this lather does not nut Tilletiaceae. fact4: This lather does not nut Tilletiaceae and is not a fortnight if that Ru implores flair. fact5: That that Ru is not a Calvinism hold. fact6: If that chevalier is a debauch the pikeblenny is a kind of a debauch. fact7: If the pikeblenny is a debauch then this ebbing is a debauch. fact8: The fact that this lather is not a Calvinism or it mists dyscalculia or both is false if that Ru does not nut Tilletiaceae. fact9: That everything is beaked and/or a Heimdallr is true. fact10: That everything does not mist dyscalculia and/or this is a Calvinism is correct. fact11: That Ru is not a Calvinism if this lather does not nut Tilletiaceae. fact12: That cervix mists dyscalculia. fact13: Something that is a debauch is both residual and not a Rousseau. fact14: If Selvin is residual that Ru implores flair. fact15: Everyone nuts Tilletiaceae and/or the person is a Calvinism. fact16: Selvin is residual if this ebbing is residual but this is not a Rousseau.

fact1: (x): ¬{G}x -> {E}x fact2: (x): ({AB}x v {A}x) fact3: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} v {AB}{b}) fact4: {C}{b} -> (¬{A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) fact5: ¬{AB}{b} fact6: {E}{f} -> {E}{e} fact7: {E}{e} -> {E}{d} fact8: ¬{A}{b} -> ¬(¬{AB}{a} v {AA}{a}) fact9: (x): ({N}x v {AO}x) fact10: (x): (¬{AA}x v {AB}x) fact11: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{AB}{b} fact12: {AA}{an} fact13: (x): {E}x -> ({D}x & ¬{F}x) fact14: {D}{c} -> {C}{b} fact15: (x): ({A}x v {AB}x) fact16: ({D}{d} & ¬{F}{d}) -> {D}{c}

Let's assume that this lather does not nut Tilletiaceae.

¬{A}{a}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Something that does not frisk Yalta is a debauch. fact2: Every man is a kind of a Calvinism and/or nuts Tilletiaceae. fact3: That that Ru does not mist dyscalculia or this one is a kind of a Calvinism or both is wrong if this lather does not nut Tilletiaceae. fact4: This lather does not nut Tilletiaceae and is not a fortnight if that Ru implores flair. fact5: That that Ru is not a Calvinism hold. fact6: If that chevalier is a debauch the pikeblenny is a kind of a debauch. fact7: If the pikeblenny is a debauch then this ebbing is a debauch. fact8: The fact that this lather is not a Calvinism or it mists dyscalculia or both is false if that Ru does not nut Tilletiaceae. fact9: That everything is beaked and/or a Heimdallr is true. fact10: That everything does not mist dyscalculia and/or this is a Calvinism is correct. fact11: That Ru is not a Calvinism if this lather does not nut Tilletiaceae. fact12: That cervix mists dyscalculia. fact13: Something that is a debauch is both residual and not a Rousseau. fact14: If Selvin is residual that Ru implores flair. fact15: Everyone nuts Tilletiaceae and/or the person is a Calvinism. fact16: Selvin is residual if this ebbing is residual but this is not a Rousseau. ; $hypothesis$ = Let's assume that this lather does not nut Tilletiaceae. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that this lather does not nut Tilletiaceae.; fact3 & assump1 -> int1: That either that Ru does not mist dyscalculia or it is a Calvinism or both is not right.; fact10 -> int2: Either that Ru does not mist dyscalculia or that person is a Calvinism or both.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That chafing pneumoconiosis happens if that impoliticness occurs.

{A} -> {B}

fact1: The rip occurs if this pyroligneousness does not occurs and this ingraining does not occurs. fact2: The legateship does not occurs and the trumping does not happens if the doricness happens. fact3: The prostateness occurs. fact4: The arguing Alismataceae occurs. fact5: That this bolometricness occurs but that contracture does not happens brings about that that chafing pneumoconiosis occurs. fact6: That chafing pneumoconiosis occurs if this non-bolometricness and that contracture occurs. fact7: That inaccessibleness occurs. fact8: If this bolometricness does not happens and that contracture does not happens then that chafing pneumoconiosis occurs. fact9: That that impoliticness occurs results in that this bolometricness does not happens and that contracture does not happens. fact10: This sleeping stature occurs. fact11: That this beclouding happens prevents this non-isthmianness.

fact1: (¬{EE} & ¬{HN}) -> {HK} fact2: {EO} -> (¬{FK} & ¬{AO}) fact3: {EA} fact4: {IK} fact5: ({AA} & ¬{AB}) -> {B} fact6: (¬{AA} & {AB}) -> {B} fact7: {D} fact8: (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) -> {B} fact9: {A} -> (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) fact10: {JH} fact11: {CH} -> {HM}

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: The rip occurs if this pyroligneousness does not occurs and this ingraining does not occurs. fact2: The legateship does not occurs and the trumping does not happens if the doricness happens. fact3: The prostateness occurs. fact4: The arguing Alismataceae occurs. fact5: That this bolometricness occurs but that contracture does not happens brings about that that chafing pneumoconiosis occurs. fact6: That chafing pneumoconiosis occurs if this non-bolometricness and that contracture occurs. fact7: That inaccessibleness occurs. fact8: If this bolometricness does not happens and that contracture does not happens then that chafing pneumoconiosis occurs. fact9: That that impoliticness occurs results in that this bolometricness does not happens and that contracture does not happens. fact10: This sleeping stature occurs. fact11: That this beclouding happens prevents this non-isthmianness. ; $hypothesis$ = That chafing pneumoconiosis happens if that impoliticness occurs. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that that impoliticness occurs.; fact9 & assump1 -> int1: This bolometricness does not occurs and that contracture does not occurs.; int1 & fact8 -> int2: That chafing pneumoconiosis occurs.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This unrhythmicness happens.

{D}

fact1: That this starring Tesla happens hold. fact2: If this gratifying regret happens that renewableness occurs. fact3: This hindering poppycock does not happens if that that vivisection and that partisanness happens does not hold. fact4: If the fact that that cuprousness does not happens and this cerebrospinalness does not occurs does not hold then this cerebrospinalness occurs. fact5: The Laws occurs if that unfilledness does not happens. fact6: That that renewableness occurs causes the fact that that that augiticness and/or that non-unrhythmicness occurs is correct. fact7: That lunching Herat does not occurs. fact8: If that augiticness happens or this unrhythmicness does not occurs or both then this unrhythmicness does not happens. fact9: That this unrhythmicness does not happens is prevented by that that inviting Langley does not occurs. fact10: The fact that that unknowableness and that biochemicalness occurs is false if that remedying does not occurs. fact11: That that non-cuprousness and that non-cerebrospinalness occurs is false if this starring Tesla does not occurs. fact12: That corruptedness occurs. fact13: That that both that vivisection and that partisanness occurs is wrong is not wrong if that unknowableness does not happens. fact14: The slip occurs. fact15: This briefing does not happens. fact16: If that cuprousness does not happens that inviting Langley does not happens. fact17: That unknowableness does not occurs if the fact that both that unknowableness and that biochemicalness occurs does not hold. fact18: This gratifying regret occurs and this gnarling oxytone happens if this hindering poppycock does not occurs. fact19: That cuprousness does not occurs if this starring Tesla occurs. fact20: That inviting Langley happens and that renewableness does not happens if that that augiticness happens is correct.

fact1: {A} fact2: {G} -> {E} fact3: ¬({K} & {J}) -> ¬{I} fact4: ¬(¬{B} & ¬{II}) -> {II} fact5: ¬{U} -> {CD} fact6: {E} -> ({F} v ¬{D}) fact7: ¬{AD} fact8: ({F} v ¬{D}) -> ¬{D} fact9: ¬{C} -> {D} fact10: ¬{N} -> ¬({L} & {M}) fact11: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{B} & ¬{II}) fact12: {FB} fact13: ¬{L} -> ¬({K} & {J}) fact14: {CQ} fact15: ¬{HT} fact16: ¬{B} -> ¬{C} fact17: ¬({L} & {M}) -> ¬{L} fact18: ¬{I} -> ({G} & {H}) fact19: {A} -> ¬{B} fact20: {F} -> ({C} & ¬{E})

The fact that this unrhythmicness does not happens hold.

¬{D}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That this starring Tesla happens hold. fact2: If this gratifying regret happens that renewableness occurs. fact3: This hindering poppycock does not happens if that that vivisection and that partisanness happens does not hold. fact4: If the fact that that cuprousness does not happens and this cerebrospinalness does not occurs does not hold then this cerebrospinalness occurs. fact5: The Laws occurs if that unfilledness does not happens. fact6: That that renewableness occurs causes the fact that that that augiticness and/or that non-unrhythmicness occurs is correct. fact7: That lunching Herat does not occurs. fact8: If that augiticness happens or this unrhythmicness does not occurs or both then this unrhythmicness does not happens. fact9: That this unrhythmicness does not happens is prevented by that that inviting Langley does not occurs. fact10: The fact that that unknowableness and that biochemicalness occurs is false if that remedying does not occurs. fact11: That that non-cuprousness and that non-cerebrospinalness occurs is false if this starring Tesla does not occurs. fact12: That corruptedness occurs. fact13: That that both that vivisection and that partisanness occurs is wrong is not wrong if that unknowableness does not happens. fact14: The slip occurs. fact15: This briefing does not happens. fact16: If that cuprousness does not happens that inviting Langley does not happens. fact17: That unknowableness does not occurs if the fact that both that unknowableness and that biochemicalness occurs does not hold. fact18: This gratifying regret occurs and this gnarling oxytone happens if this hindering poppycock does not occurs. fact19: That cuprousness does not occurs if this starring Tesla occurs. fact20: That inviting Langley happens and that renewableness does not happens if that that augiticness happens is correct. ; $hypothesis$ = This unrhythmicness happens. ; $proof$ =

fact19 & fact1 -> int1: That cuprousness does not occurs.; int1 & fact16 -> int2: That inviting Langley does not happens.; int2 & fact9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That everything is a project is incorrect.

¬((x): {A}x)

fact1: Every man exhales AMEX. fact2: Everything does snip lepidoptery. fact3: Everything is a Valois. fact4: Every person is not a dreaming. fact5: Everything does focalize. fact6: Something that does not avoid Littorinidae is both not a Everest and not undescriptive. fact7: Everything is supernal. fact8: Every person damns passiveness. fact9: Everything is caducous. fact10: Everyone is unarmed. fact11: That some man is not a project and is a Everest does not hold if this person is undescriptive. fact12: The fact that every person is a kind of a Uropygi is right. fact13: Everybody is a Weimar. fact14: Everything is a kind of a longhand. fact15: Everything is a Carolingian. fact16: Something is a integrality if it is a project. fact17: Something is genuine and is a project if that is not a Everest. fact18: Everything does steal Elbe. fact19: Everyone is a kind of a project. fact20: Someone that is not a dreaming is a kind of liveable a Triassic. fact21: Every person is biaxal.

fact1: (x): {FR}x fact2: (x): {S}x fact3: (x): {GF}x fact4: (x): ¬{H}x fact5: (x): {CC}x fact6: (x): ¬{D}x -> (¬{B}x & ¬{C}x) fact7: (x): {EE}x fact8: (x): {HJ}x fact9: (x): {EU}x fact10: (x): {FJ}x fact11: (x): {C}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & {B}x) fact12: (x): {HL}x fact13: (x): {DT}x fact14: (x): {FO}x fact15: (x): {EL}x fact16: (x): {A}x -> {DE}x fact17: (x): ¬{B}x -> ({HO}x & {A}x) fact18: (x): {IT}x fact19: (x): {A}x fact20: (x): ¬{H}x -> ({G}x & {F}x) fact21: (x): {CQ}x

That every man is a kind of a integrality hold.

(x): {DE}x

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Every man exhales AMEX. fact2: Everything does snip lepidoptery. fact3: Everything is a Valois. fact4: Every person is not a dreaming. fact5: Everything does focalize. fact6: Something that does not avoid Littorinidae is both not a Everest and not undescriptive. fact7: Everything is supernal. fact8: Every person damns passiveness. fact9: Everything is caducous. fact10: Everyone is unarmed. fact11: That some man is not a project and is a Everest does not hold if this person is undescriptive. fact12: The fact that every person is a kind of a Uropygi is right. fact13: Everybody is a Weimar. fact14: Everything is a kind of a longhand. fact15: Everything is a Carolingian. fact16: Something is a integrality if it is a project. fact17: Something is genuine and is a project if that is not a Everest. fact18: Everything does steal Elbe. fact19: Everyone is a kind of a project. fact20: Someone that is not a dreaming is a kind of liveable a Triassic. fact21: Every person is biaxal. ; $hypothesis$ = That everything is a project is incorrect. ; $proof$ =

fact19 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That Rorschach does not happens.

¬{D}

fact1: If that retaking does not happens the fact that that Rorschach occurs and that annihilating Vanderbilt occurs hold. fact2: Both that annihilating Vanderbilt and that retaking happens. fact3: That batting occurs and this scuffing compliancy happens. fact4: That Rorschach does not occurs if both that batting and that retaking happens.

fact1: ¬{B} -> ({D} & {A}) fact2: ({A} & {B}) fact3: ({C} & {E}) fact4: ({C} & {B}) -> ¬{D}

That Rorschach occurs.

{D}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that retaking does not happens the fact that that Rorschach occurs and that annihilating Vanderbilt occurs hold. fact2: Both that annihilating Vanderbilt and that retaking happens. fact3: That batting occurs and this scuffing compliancy happens. fact4: That Rorschach does not occurs if both that batting and that retaking happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That Rorschach does not happens. ; $proof$ =

fact2 -> int1: That retaking occurs.; fact3 -> int2: That batting occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That batting and that retaking occurs.; int3 & fact4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That diaphragm is a Calorie.

{A}{b}

fact1: The fact that something is a kind of a incaution and does not junk gibibit is incorrect if it is a implicitness. fact2: Some man that is not a incaution either is a genie or is a kind of a shout or both. fact3: The golem is not a MacLeish. fact4: The fact that this Ostariophysi is not a rear and/or it is not a perceptibility is incorrect. fact5: If that Riffian is not a Calorie that diaphragm is not a kind of a rear. fact6: That Riffian is not a Calorie if that diaphragm is not a rear. fact7: That Galilaean is a implicitness that is a Pithecolobium if the golem is not a kind of a MacLeish. fact8: If the fact that that either that Riffian is not a permutability or the thing does not mosh or both is incorrect is right that Riffian is not a rear. fact9: That Riffian moshes. fact10: That that Riffian either is not a permutability or does not mosh or both is not correct. fact11: That diaphragm is a rear that is a Calorie if that Riffian is not a genie. fact12: That that Riffian either is not a Calorie or does not mosh or both is false. fact13: If that either that Riffian is not a permutability or it moshes or both is incorrect then it is not a kind of a rear. fact14: If that something is a kind of a incaution that does not junk gibibit is false it is not a kind of a incaution. fact15: If that diaphragm is not a permutability then that Riffian is not a Calorie.

fact1: (x): {G}x -> ¬({E}x & ¬{F}x) fact2: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({C}x v {D}x) fact3: ¬{I}{d} fact4: ¬(¬{B}{fb} v ¬{BL}{fb}) fact5: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{B}{b} fact6: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬{A}{a} fact7: ¬{I}{d} -> ({G}{c} & {H}{c}) fact8: ¬(¬{AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact9: {AB}{a} fact10: ¬(¬{AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) fact11: ¬{C}{a} -> ({B}{b} & {A}{b}) fact12: ¬(¬{A}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) fact13: ¬(¬{AA}{a} v {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact14: (x): ¬({E}x & ¬{F}x) -> ¬{E}x fact15: ¬{AA}{b} -> ¬{A}{a}

That diaphragm is a Calorie.

{A}{b}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that something is a kind of a incaution and does not junk gibibit is incorrect if it is a implicitness. fact2: Some man that is not a incaution either is a genie or is a kind of a shout or both. fact3: The golem is not a MacLeish. fact4: The fact that this Ostariophysi is not a rear and/or it is not a perceptibility is incorrect. fact5: If that Riffian is not a Calorie that diaphragm is not a kind of a rear. fact6: That Riffian is not a Calorie if that diaphragm is not a rear. fact7: That Galilaean is a implicitness that is a Pithecolobium if the golem is not a kind of a MacLeish. fact8: If the fact that that either that Riffian is not a permutability or the thing does not mosh or both is incorrect is right that Riffian is not a rear. fact9: That Riffian moshes. fact10: That that Riffian either is not a permutability or does not mosh or both is not correct. fact11: That diaphragm is a rear that is a Calorie if that Riffian is not a genie. fact12: That that Riffian either is not a Calorie or does not mosh or both is false. fact13: If that either that Riffian is not a permutability or it moshes or both is incorrect then it is not a kind of a rear. fact14: If that something is a kind of a incaution that does not junk gibibit is false it is not a kind of a incaution. fact15: If that diaphragm is not a permutability then that Riffian is not a Calorie. ; $hypothesis$ = That diaphragm is a Calorie. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This colouring does not proselytise Sciuromorpha.

¬{C}{a}

fact1: Something does not intrude. fact2: The meteorite sleds Hypoxidaceae but it does not intrude. fact3: This colouring proselytises Sciuromorpha if something that sleds Hypoxidaceae does not intrude. fact4: Something does not proselytise Sciuromorpha if the fact that it does not sled Hypoxidaceae is right. fact5: There is something such that it sleds Hypoxidaceae.

fact1: (Ex): ¬{B}x fact2: ({A}{aa} & ¬{B}{aa}) fact3: (x): ({A}x & ¬{B}x) -> {C}{a} fact4: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬{C}x fact5: (Ex): {A}x

This colouring does not proselytise Sciuromorpha.

¬{C}{a}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Something does not intrude. fact2: The meteorite sleds Hypoxidaceae but it does not intrude. fact3: This colouring proselytises Sciuromorpha if something that sleds Hypoxidaceae does not intrude. fact4: Something does not proselytise Sciuromorpha if the fact that it does not sled Hypoxidaceae is right. fact5: There is something such that it sleds Hypoxidaceae. ; $hypothesis$ = This colouring does not proselytise Sciuromorpha. ; $proof$ =

fact2 -> int1: Somebody sleds Hypoxidaceae but he does not intrude.; int1 & fact3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That that anadromousness occurs and that rescheduling maidhood does not happens is false.

¬({AA} & ¬{AB})

fact1: Notthis Nipponese but this conjunctiveness occurs. fact2: If this chicanery does not occurs then that anadromousness and this headlock occurs. fact3: If this digitalization does not occurs that that rescheduling maidhood happens and the Togolese occurs is wrong. fact4: If the fact that both that Citation and that antiquing Pomacentrus happens is wrong that Citation does not happens. fact5: The fact that both that Citation and that antiquing Pomacentrus occurs does not hold if this Nipponese does not occurs. fact6: That this chicanery happens is prevented by that that Citation does not happens. fact7: If the fact that that rescheduling maidhood happens and the Togolese happens is not correct then that rescheduling maidhood does not occurs. fact8: That that anadromousness occurs and that rescheduling maidhood does not happens is false.

fact1: (¬{G} & {K}) fact2: ¬{B} -> ({AA} & {A}) fact3: ¬{E} -> ¬({AB} & {C}) fact4: ¬({D} & {F}) -> ¬{D} fact5: ¬{G} -> ¬({D} & {F}) fact6: ¬{D} -> ¬{B} fact7: ¬({AB} & {C}) -> ¬{AB} fact8: ¬({AA} & ¬{AB})

That anadromousness occurs and that rescheduling maidhood does not occurs.

({AA} & ¬{AB})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Notthis Nipponese but this conjunctiveness occurs. fact2: If this chicanery does not occurs then that anadromousness and this headlock occurs. fact3: If this digitalization does not occurs that that rescheduling maidhood happens and the Togolese occurs is wrong. fact4: If the fact that both that Citation and that antiquing Pomacentrus happens is wrong that Citation does not happens. fact5: The fact that both that Citation and that antiquing Pomacentrus occurs does not hold if this Nipponese does not occurs. fact6: That this chicanery happens is prevented by that that Citation does not happens. fact7: If the fact that that rescheduling maidhood happens and the Togolese happens is not correct then that rescheduling maidhood does not occurs. fact8: That that anadromousness occurs and that rescheduling maidhood does not happens is false. ; $hypothesis$ = That that anadromousness occurs and that rescheduling maidhood does not happens is false. ; $proof$ =

fact8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This impedance does not occurs.

¬{D}

fact1: This seiche occurs if this comic occurs. fact2: That that itemization but notthat victimising blondness happens is not correct if that mercilessness does not happens. fact3: This seiche occurs if the Liverpudlian occurs. fact4: That this comic occurs and the Liverpudlian does not occurs is incorrect if this pyemicness occurs. fact5: The fact that this comic does not happens is true if that that this comic but notthe Liverpudlian happens does not hold is right. fact6: If that this comic does not occurs is correct then that notthis impedance but this seiche happens is not correct. fact7: That mercilessness occurs and that victimising blondness happens. fact8: That landlessness does not occurs if that chelateding trusting happens and that overbalancing Dumuzi occurs. fact9: If the fact that that itemization but notthat victimising blondness happens does not hold then that itemization does not occurs. fact10: If the fact that that landlessness does not happens is right this pyemicness happens and this vowing leisureliness happens. fact11: The fact that this impedance does not occurs is right if both that mercilessness and this seiche occurs. fact12: The non-subduralness causes that the shrilling happens and that engrossing happens. fact13: The fact that that overbalancing Dumuzi happens hold if that superciliousness occurs. fact14: That chelateding trusting happens if the shrilling happens. fact15: The subduralness does not happens.

fact1: {E} -> {C} fact2: ¬{A} -> ¬({DL} & ¬{B}) fact3: {F} -> {C} fact4: {G} -> ¬({E} & ¬{F}) fact5: ¬({E} & ¬{F}) -> ¬{E} fact6: ¬{E} -> ¬(¬{D} & {C}) fact7: ({A} & {B}) fact8: ({K} & {J}) -> ¬{I} fact9: ¬({DL} & ¬{B}) -> ¬{DL} fact10: ¬{I} -> ({G} & {H}) fact11: ({A} & {C}) -> ¬{D} fact12: ¬{P} -> ({L} & {O}) fact13: {M} -> {J} fact14: {L} -> {K} fact15: ¬{P}

That itemization does not happens.

¬{DL}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This seiche occurs if this comic occurs. fact2: That that itemization but notthat victimising blondness happens is not correct if that mercilessness does not happens. fact3: This seiche occurs if the Liverpudlian occurs. fact4: That this comic occurs and the Liverpudlian does not occurs is incorrect if this pyemicness occurs. fact5: The fact that this comic does not happens is true if that that this comic but notthe Liverpudlian happens does not hold is right. fact6: If that this comic does not occurs is correct then that notthis impedance but this seiche happens is not correct. fact7: That mercilessness occurs and that victimising blondness happens. fact8: That landlessness does not occurs if that chelateding trusting happens and that overbalancing Dumuzi occurs. fact9: If the fact that that itemization but notthat victimising blondness happens does not hold then that itemization does not occurs. fact10: If the fact that that landlessness does not happens is right this pyemicness happens and this vowing leisureliness happens. fact11: The fact that this impedance does not occurs is right if both that mercilessness and this seiche occurs. fact12: The non-subduralness causes that the shrilling happens and that engrossing happens. fact13: The fact that that overbalancing Dumuzi happens hold if that superciliousness occurs. fact14: That chelateding trusting happens if the shrilling happens. fact15: The subduralness does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = This impedance does not occurs. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That that headland is a Qaeda but the thing is not nondisposable is incorrect.

¬({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b})

fact1: The fact that that headland is a Qaeda and he is not disposable does not hold. fact2: The fact that this tomboy tuckers punctiliousness and it is a Qaeda is not true. fact3: This tomboy tuckers punctiliousness. fact4: this punctiliousness tuckers tomboy. fact5: If the fact that that headland tuckers punctiliousness is true that this tomboy is a Qaeda but it is not nondisposable is wrong. fact6: If this tomboy tuckers punctiliousness that that headland is a kind of a Qaeda but it is not nondisposable is not right. fact7: That this odontiasis is a kind of a cadaster and that person is a kind of a Qaeda does not hold. fact8: The fact that this tomboy tuckers punctiliousness and he is nondisposable does not hold if that headland is a Qaeda. fact9: The fact that that headland does tucker punctiliousness and is nondisposable is wrong. fact10: The fact that the coriander is a kind of a NAWCWPNS that is not a Acanthocereus is not true. fact11: The fact that that headland does pulse Lisboa and that is guttural is false.

fact1: ¬({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact2: ¬({A}{a} & {AA}{a}) fact3: {A}{a} fact4: {AC}{aa} fact5: {A}{b} -> ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact6: {A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact7: ¬({ER}{au} & {AA}{au}) fact8: {AA}{b} -> ¬({A}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact9: ¬({A}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact10: ¬({ET}{cu} & ¬{DT}{cu}) fact11: ¬({HP}{b} & {BU}{b})

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that that headland is a Qaeda and he is not disposable does not hold. fact2: The fact that this tomboy tuckers punctiliousness and it is a Qaeda is not true. fact3: This tomboy tuckers punctiliousness. fact4: this punctiliousness tuckers tomboy. fact5: If the fact that that headland tuckers punctiliousness is true that this tomboy is a Qaeda but it is not nondisposable is wrong. fact6: If this tomboy tuckers punctiliousness that that headland is a kind of a Qaeda but it is not nondisposable is not right. fact7: That this odontiasis is a kind of a cadaster and that person is a kind of a Qaeda does not hold. fact8: The fact that this tomboy tuckers punctiliousness and he is nondisposable does not hold if that headland is a Qaeda. fact9: The fact that that headland does tucker punctiliousness and is nondisposable is wrong. fact10: The fact that the coriander is a kind of a NAWCWPNS that is not a Acanthocereus is not true. fact11: The fact that that headland does pulse Lisboa and that is guttural is false. ; $hypothesis$ = That that headland is a Qaeda but the thing is not nondisposable is incorrect. ; $proof$ =

fact6 & fact3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That that this degrading krone occurs and this conducing occurs is not incorrect is wrong.

¬({A} & {B})

fact1: That treating semicentennial occurs. fact2: If that fagoting bibbed does not occurs then that the fact that this degrading krone and this conducing occurs does not hold is true. fact3: That this unionising rosary and this degrading krone happens is caused by that this conducing does not occurs. fact4: This degrading krone occurs. fact5: That sabbatical happens.

fact1: {FA} fact2: ¬{C} -> ¬({A} & {B}) fact3: ¬{B} -> ({II} & {A}) fact4: {A} fact5: {HD}

That that this degrading krone occurs and this conducing occurs is not incorrect is wrong.

¬({A} & {B})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That treating semicentennial occurs. fact2: If that fagoting bibbed does not occurs then that the fact that this degrading krone and this conducing occurs does not hold is true. fact3: That this unionising rosary and this degrading krone happens is caused by that this conducing does not occurs. fact4: This degrading krone occurs. fact5: That sabbatical happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That that this degrading krone occurs and this conducing occurs is not incorrect is wrong. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That cacodylicness does not occurs and this unregeneratedness does not occurs.

(¬{AA} & ¬{AB})

fact1: That that unwholesomeness happens and that uniformed does not occurs prevents this libration. fact2: That that laxative does not happens hold if that that keeping or that protraction or both occurs is incorrect. fact3: If this libration does not happens both that protraction and that keeping happens. fact4: If both that non-unwholesomeness and that uniformed occurs that this libration does not happens hold. fact5: The fact that that intercession does not occurs and the syncreticness does not happens is false. fact6: That the fact that that non-cacodylicness and this unregeneratedness happens does not hold is right if that keeping does not occurs. fact7: The fact that that keeping or that protraction or both happens is incorrect if this libration does not occurs. fact8: That that keeping occurs yields that both that non-cacodylicness and that non-unregeneratedness occurs. fact9: The fact that that non-cacodylicness and this unregeneratedness occurs does not hold. fact10: That that cacodylicness and that non-unregeneratedness happens is false if that keeping does not occurs. fact11: If this ravishing does not happens this tantalization occurs and/or that Downingness happens. fact12: That this unaccompaniedness happens brings about that this showering does not happens and this creeping occurs. fact13: If that keeping does not happens then the fact that both that non-cacodylicness and that non-unregeneratedness happens does not hold. fact14: That keeping does not happens. fact15: That unwholesomeness happens and that uniformed does not occurs if this articularness occurs. fact16: The fact that that cacodylicness occurs but this unregeneratedness does not occurs is false. fact17: If this showering does not happens then this articularness happens and that unblocking Chinookan occurs.

fact1: ({E} & ¬{D}) -> ¬{C} fact2: ¬({A} v {B}) -> ¬{BJ} fact3: ¬{C} -> ({B} & {A}) fact4: (¬{E} & {D}) -> ¬{C} fact5: ¬(¬{FI} & ¬{II}) fact6: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) fact7: ¬{C} -> ¬({A} v {B}) fact8: {A} -> (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) fact9: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) fact10: ¬{A} -> ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) fact11: ¬{M} -> ({L} v {K}) fact12: {J} -> (¬{H} & {I}) fact13: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) fact14: ¬{A} fact15: {F} -> ({E} & ¬{D}) fact16: ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) fact17: ¬{H} -> ({F} & {G})

That cacodylicness does not occurs and this unregeneratedness does not occurs.

(¬{AA} & ¬{AB})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That that unwholesomeness happens and that uniformed does not occurs prevents this libration. fact2: That that laxative does not happens hold if that that keeping or that protraction or both occurs is incorrect. fact3: If this libration does not happens both that protraction and that keeping happens. fact4: If both that non-unwholesomeness and that uniformed occurs that this libration does not happens hold. fact5: The fact that that intercession does not occurs and the syncreticness does not happens is false. fact6: That the fact that that non-cacodylicness and this unregeneratedness happens does not hold is right if that keeping does not occurs. fact7: The fact that that keeping or that protraction or both happens is incorrect if this libration does not occurs. fact8: That that keeping occurs yields that both that non-cacodylicness and that non-unregeneratedness occurs. fact9: The fact that that non-cacodylicness and this unregeneratedness occurs does not hold. fact10: That that cacodylicness and that non-unregeneratedness happens is false if that keeping does not occurs. fact11: If this ravishing does not happens this tantalization occurs and/or that Downingness happens. fact12: That this unaccompaniedness happens brings about that this showering does not happens and this creeping occurs. fact13: If that keeping does not happens then the fact that both that non-cacodylicness and that non-unregeneratedness happens does not hold. fact14: That keeping does not happens. fact15: That unwholesomeness happens and that uniformed does not occurs if this articularness occurs. fact16: The fact that that cacodylicness occurs but this unregeneratedness does not occurs is false. fact17: If this showering does not happens then this articularness happens and that unblocking Chinookan occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That cacodylicness does not occurs and this unregeneratedness does not occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact13 & fact14 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That that blacking does not occurs is true.

¬{B}

fact1: That the slumber does not occurs and the ecologicness does not happens leads to that the cardinalship does not occurs. fact2: That clogging does not happens and this fuckup does not occurs. fact3: That that clogging does not happens but this fuckup happens prevents that blacking. fact4: If the unwrinkledness does not occurs this premedicalness happens and this baperson occurs. fact5: The kibitzing sixer does not happens and this dithyramb does not occurs. fact6: If the fact that the adjuration occurs and that Amerindicness occurs is incorrect that intemperateness does not occurs. fact7: That that grading Daubentoniidae happens is prevented by that the non-intemperateness and this encrimsoning Polygala happens. fact8: If that clogging does not happens and this fuckup does not happens that blacking does not happens. fact9: That the unwrinkledness does not occurs is caused by that this excision occurs. fact10: Both this excision and that eyeballing lipoidaemia occurs if that grading Daubentoniidae does not occurs. fact11: That indexing Zoarcidae is prevented by that this excision does not occurs and that proving hypallage does not happens. fact12: If this baone happens then notthat proving hypallage but this shattering happens. fact13: Notthe upbraiding Juncaginaceae but that blacking happens if that this shattering happens is not false. fact14: This extermination does not occurs.

fact1: (¬{EQ} & ¬{AL}) -> ¬{CT} fact2: (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) fact3: (¬{AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} fact4: ¬{G} -> ({F} & {E}) fact5: (¬{U} & ¬{DL}) fact6: ¬({M} & {N}) -> ¬{K} fact7: (¬{K} & {L}) -> ¬{J} fact8: (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) -> ¬{B} fact9: {H} -> ¬{G} fact10: ¬{J} -> ({H} & {I}) fact11: (¬{H} & ¬{D}) -> ¬{GM} fact12: {E} -> (¬{D} & {C}) fact13: {C} -> (¬{A} & {B}) fact14: ¬{EI}

That blacking happens.

{B}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That the slumber does not occurs and the ecologicness does not happens leads to that the cardinalship does not occurs. fact2: That clogging does not happens and this fuckup does not occurs. fact3: That that clogging does not happens but this fuckup happens prevents that blacking. fact4: If the unwrinkledness does not occurs this premedicalness happens and this baperson occurs. fact5: The kibitzing sixer does not happens and this dithyramb does not occurs. fact6: If the fact that the adjuration occurs and that Amerindicness occurs is incorrect that intemperateness does not occurs. fact7: That that grading Daubentoniidae happens is prevented by that the non-intemperateness and this encrimsoning Polygala happens. fact8: If that clogging does not happens and this fuckup does not happens that blacking does not happens. fact9: That the unwrinkledness does not occurs is caused by that this excision occurs. fact10: Both this excision and that eyeballing lipoidaemia occurs if that grading Daubentoniidae does not occurs. fact11: That indexing Zoarcidae is prevented by that this excision does not occurs and that proving hypallage does not happens. fact12: If this baone happens then notthat proving hypallage but this shattering happens. fact13: Notthe upbraiding Juncaginaceae but that blacking happens if that this shattering happens is not false. fact14: This extermination does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That that blacking does not occurs is true. ; $proof$ =

fact8 & fact2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This etiolateding does not occurs.

¬{A}

fact1: This bamboozling Tachyglossidae occurs and the tempering happens. fact2: The fact that the robing eulogy does not occurs is not false. fact3: That that disservice occurs and this matricide occurs is caused by that the robing eulogy does not occurs. fact4: The activating occurs. fact5: That both this bamboozling Tachyglossidae and this matricide occurs prevents that the tacking happens. fact6: This etiolateding occurs. fact7: That this glossopharyngealness does not occurs brings about that that sweating gestalt does not happens but this solacing infinitesimal occurs. fact8: If that defrayal does not occurs either this revolutionariness happens or this scrimpiness happens or both. fact9: If the tacking does not happens this malodorousness does not happens and this rearrangement does not occurs. fact10: That defrayal does not occurs if that notthis pairing but the bullfighting occurs is false. fact11: That this pairing does not happens and the bullfighting happens is incorrect if this rearrangement does not happens. fact12: Both this etiolateding and that pleximetry happens if that sweating gestalt does not happens.

fact1: ({M} & {Q}) fact2: ¬{P} fact3: ¬{P} -> ({O} & {N}) fact4: {GQ} fact5: ({M} & {N}) -> ¬{L} fact6: {A} fact7: ¬{D} -> (¬{B} & {C}) fact8: ¬{G} -> ({F} v {E}) fact9: ¬{L} -> (¬{K} & ¬{J}) fact10: ¬(¬{H} & {I}) -> ¬{G} fact11: ¬{J} -> ¬(¬{H} & {I}) fact12: ¬{B} -> ({A} & {BC})

That pleximetry occurs.

{BC}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This bamboozling Tachyglossidae occurs and the tempering happens. fact2: The fact that the robing eulogy does not occurs is not false. fact3: That that disservice occurs and this matricide occurs is caused by that the robing eulogy does not occurs. fact4: The activating occurs. fact5: That both this bamboozling Tachyglossidae and this matricide occurs prevents that the tacking happens. fact6: This etiolateding occurs. fact7: That this glossopharyngealness does not occurs brings about that that sweating gestalt does not happens but this solacing infinitesimal occurs. fact8: If that defrayal does not occurs either this revolutionariness happens or this scrimpiness happens or both. fact9: If the tacking does not happens this malodorousness does not happens and this rearrangement does not occurs. fact10: That defrayal does not occurs if that notthis pairing but the bullfighting occurs is false. fact11: That this pairing does not happens and the bullfighting happens is incorrect if this rearrangement does not happens. fact12: Both this etiolateding and that pleximetry happens if that sweating gestalt does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = This etiolateding does not occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

The fact that that countinghouse is a Y2K is right.

{A}{a}

fact1: Something does not stink if that this is a cladistics that is not a disjuncture hold. fact2: That countinghouse is a Y2K and huffs Glaser. fact3: If this bitumen is not non-elfin and it huffs Glaser then that countinghouse is not a Y2K. fact4: That pissing brings if that porgy is archidiaconal. fact5: That some person does not wish plenty is correct if it is a piquance. fact6: That porgy is a dyspnea and is not unfunded. fact7: If that pissing brings the fact that this student entertains hold. fact8: That that porgy is a kind of a disjuncture but it does not ghost Aspinwall is wrong if it is pedagogical. fact9: If something does not wish plenty then it is not non-elfin and huffs Glaser. fact10: The adjustment is a Y2K and is a Pinnotheridae. fact11: Something is archidiaconal and is a natal if it does not stink. fact12: If the fact that that porgy is a disjuncture but it does not ghost Aspinwall does not hold then that it is not a disjuncture is true. fact13: If that porgy is a kind of a dyspnea but it is not unfunded it is a kind of a Arminian. fact14: The fact that this bitumen is a piquance hold if that Mt is a kind of a Scincidae. fact15: If some person is both not a Saratoga and not a dacryocystitis this person is not non-pedagogical. fact16: That Mt is a Scincidae if this student entertains. fact17: If that porgy is a kind of a Arminian the person is a cladistics.

fact1: (x): ({M}x & ¬{L}x) -> ¬{K}x fact2: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact3: ({C}{b} & {B}{b}) -> ¬{A}{a} fact4: {I}{f} -> {H}{e} fact5: (x): {E}x -> ¬{D}x fact6: ({S}{f} & ¬{T}{f}) fact7: {H}{e} -> {G}{d} fact8: {N}{f} -> ¬({L}{f} & ¬{O}{f}) fact9: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({C}x & {B}x) fact10: ({A}{in} & {DP}{in}) fact11: (x): ¬{K}x -> ({I}x & {J}x) fact12: ¬({L}{f} & ¬{O}{f}) -> ¬{L}{f} fact13: ({S}{f} & ¬{T}{f}) -> {R}{f} fact14: {F}{c} -> {E}{b} fact15: (x): (¬{Q}x & ¬{P}x) -> {N}x fact16: {G}{d} -> {F}{c} fact17: {R}{f} -> {M}{f}

That countinghouse is not a Y2K.

¬{A}{a}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Something does not stink if that this is a cladistics that is not a disjuncture hold. fact2: That countinghouse is a Y2K and huffs Glaser. fact3: If this bitumen is not non-elfin and it huffs Glaser then that countinghouse is not a Y2K. fact4: That pissing brings if that porgy is archidiaconal. fact5: That some person does not wish plenty is correct if it is a piquance. fact6: That porgy is a dyspnea and is not unfunded. fact7: If that pissing brings the fact that this student entertains hold. fact8: That that porgy is a kind of a disjuncture but it does not ghost Aspinwall is wrong if it is pedagogical. fact9: If something does not wish plenty then it is not non-elfin and huffs Glaser. fact10: The adjustment is a Y2K and is a Pinnotheridae. fact11: Something is archidiaconal and is a natal if it does not stink. fact12: If the fact that that porgy is a disjuncture but it does not ghost Aspinwall does not hold then that it is not a disjuncture is true. fact13: If that porgy is a kind of a dyspnea but it is not unfunded it is a kind of a Arminian. fact14: The fact that this bitumen is a piquance hold if that Mt is a kind of a Scincidae. fact15: If some person is both not a Saratoga and not a dacryocystitis this person is not non-pedagogical. fact16: That Mt is a Scincidae if this student entertains. fact17: If that porgy is a kind of a Arminian the person is a cladistics. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that countinghouse is a Y2K is right. ; $proof$ =

fact2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This caribe is a Tbit that is pyrolytic.

({C}{a} & {D}{a})

fact1: the counterproposal does not compromise caribe. fact2: Something is pyrolytic if the thing accents Khios. fact3: If something is a kind of a grail it is a commemorative. fact4: The Raffia is a PAC if the Raffia does not travel but it blithers. fact5: If something does not compromise counterproposal and is a Casuarinaceae it is a Tbit. fact6: This caribe accents Khios and it is a PAC. fact7: This caribe is a Casuarinaceae.

fact1: ¬{AA}{aa} fact2: (x): {E}x -> {D}x fact3: (x): {FI}x -> {DI}x fact4: (¬{AH}{gi} & {AQ}{gi}) -> {F}{gi} fact5: (x): (¬{A}x & {B}x) -> {C}x fact6: ({E}{a} & {F}{a}) fact7: {B}{a}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: the counterproposal does not compromise caribe. fact2: Something is pyrolytic if the thing accents Khios. fact3: If something is a kind of a grail it is a commemorative. fact4: The Raffia is a PAC if the Raffia does not travel but it blithers. fact5: If something does not compromise counterproposal and is a Casuarinaceae it is a Tbit. fact6: This caribe accents Khios and it is a PAC. fact7: This caribe is a Casuarinaceae. ; $hypothesis$ = This caribe is a Tbit that is pyrolytic. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This reserve does not unclasp buoy.

¬{B}{aa}

fact1: This baccy is a lightheartedness. fact2: This reserve unclasps buoy if that does source Eurylaimidae and does not iodinate Stockholm. fact3: If someone is not a loneliness then that she/he is a Bukharin and she/he does not respond Hindi is not right. fact4: Something does not boo indeterminateness if it is a lightheartedness and is a Asiatic. fact5: this Hindi does not respond reserve. fact6: This reserve does not source Eurylaimidae if that one does not respond Hindi. fact7: This reserve does not source Eurylaimidae. fact8: This reserve does not respond Hindi. fact9: If something sources Eurylaimidae and does not iodinate Stockholm it unclasps buoy. fact10: Somebody does unclasp buoy but the one does not respond Hindi if the one is a kind of a Bukharin. fact11: This reserve iodinates Stockholm if it is not a Suharto and it does not chip Vermont. fact12: If that that protectionist is a Bukharin but the person does not respond Hindi is not right this reserve does not unclasp buoy. fact13: That someone is not a loneliness and she/he is not a kind of a Megaloptera is false if she/he does not boo indeterminateness. fact14: If that somebody is not a loneliness and she/he is not a Megaloptera does not hold she/he is a kind of a Bukharin. fact15: The fact that that protectionist is not a loneliness if the fact that this vitality is not a loneliness and boos indeterminateness is not correct is right. fact16: If something that does not source Eurylaimidae does not iodinate Stockholm then that thing unclasps buoy.

fact1: {H}{dh} fact2: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} fact3: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬({C}x & ¬{A}x) fact4: (x): ({H}x & {G}x) -> ¬{F}x fact5: ¬{AD}{ac} fact6: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬{AA}{aa} fact7: ¬{AA}{aa} fact8: ¬{A}{aa} fact9: (x): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x fact10: (x): {C}x -> ({B}x & ¬{A}x) fact11: (¬{CD}{aa} & ¬{GN}{aa}) -> {AB}{aa} fact12: ¬({C}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) -> ¬{B}{aa} fact13: (x): ¬{F}x -> ¬(¬{D}x & ¬{E}x) fact14: (x): ¬(¬{D}x & ¬{E}x) -> {C}x fact15: ¬(¬{D}{b} & {F}{b}) -> ¬{D}{a} fact16: (x): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x

This baccy unclasps buoy.

{B}{dh}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This baccy is a lightheartedness. fact2: This reserve unclasps buoy if that does source Eurylaimidae and does not iodinate Stockholm. fact3: If someone is not a loneliness then that she/he is a Bukharin and she/he does not respond Hindi is not right. fact4: Something does not boo indeterminateness if it is a lightheartedness and is a Asiatic. fact5: this Hindi does not respond reserve. fact6: This reserve does not source Eurylaimidae if that one does not respond Hindi. fact7: This reserve does not source Eurylaimidae. fact8: This reserve does not respond Hindi. fact9: If something sources Eurylaimidae and does not iodinate Stockholm it unclasps buoy. fact10: Somebody does unclasp buoy but the one does not respond Hindi if the one is a kind of a Bukharin. fact11: This reserve iodinates Stockholm if it is not a Suharto and it does not chip Vermont. fact12: If that that protectionist is a Bukharin but the person does not respond Hindi is not right this reserve does not unclasp buoy. fact13: That someone is not a loneliness and she/he is not a kind of a Megaloptera is false if she/he does not boo indeterminateness. fact14: If that somebody is not a loneliness and she/he is not a Megaloptera does not hold she/he is a kind of a Bukharin. fact15: The fact that that protectionist is not a loneliness if the fact that this vitality is not a loneliness and boos indeterminateness is not correct is right. fact16: If something that does not source Eurylaimidae does not iodinate Stockholm then that thing unclasps buoy. ; $hypothesis$ = This reserve does not unclasp buoy. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That there exists nobody such that she/he is non-amenorrhoeal one that is a broiling does not hold.

¬((x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x))

fact1: That if something boils astuteness it is a Norwegian is true. fact2: There is no man such that it is a decennium and it is a moderating. fact3: There is nothing that does not reunite and does etymologizing costalgia. fact4: There exists nothing such that this does not unhallowed Pascal and inculcates verbosity. fact5: The fact that some man is not a rinderpest but a huddle does not hold if it apes Leptoptilus. fact6: There is nothing that is not a tattered and fasts valiance. fact7: There exists no one that formulates Amerind and does not suspend. fact8: There exists nothing such that it does not boil astuteness and it saponifieds. fact9: There exists nothing that is a kind of amenorrhoeal a broiling. fact10: That something apes Leptoptilus and boils astuteness is false if that is not a Norwegian. fact11: Something is not unintegrated if that it does not formulate Amerind is correct. fact12: A non-unintegrated thing is a kind of bituminoid thing that boils astuteness. fact13: Something does not formulate Amerind if the fact that this thing formulate Amerind and does not suspend is not correct. fact14: If someone is a Norwegian she apes Leptoptilus. fact15: There exists nothing such that it is not amenorrhoeal and it is a broiling.

fact1: (x): {C}x -> {B}x fact2: (x): ¬({CO}x & {EJ}x) fact3: (x): ¬(¬{AF}x & {FO}x) fact4: (x): ¬(¬{IC}x & {GR}x) fact5: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{HS}x & {JF}x) fact6: (x): ¬(¬{GN}x & {BF}x) fact7: (x): ¬({F}x & ¬{H}x) fact8: (x): ¬(¬{C}x & {P}x) fact9: (x): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) fact10: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬({A}x & {C}x) fact11: (x): ¬{F}x -> ¬{E}x fact12: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({D}x & {C}x) fact13: (x): ¬({F}x & ¬{H}x) -> ¬{F}x fact14: (x): {B}x -> {A}x fact15: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x)

There exists none that is both not a Ochoa and a Bairava.

(x): ¬(¬{BP}x & {JG}x)

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That if something boils astuteness it is a Norwegian is true. fact2: There is no man such that it is a decennium and it is a moderating. fact3: There is nothing that does not reunite and does etymologizing costalgia. fact4: There exists nothing such that this does not unhallowed Pascal and inculcates verbosity. fact5: The fact that some man is not a rinderpest but a huddle does not hold if it apes Leptoptilus. fact6: There is nothing that is not a tattered and fasts valiance. fact7: There exists no one that formulates Amerind and does not suspend. fact8: There exists nothing such that it does not boil astuteness and it saponifieds. fact9: There exists nothing that is a kind of amenorrhoeal a broiling. fact10: That something apes Leptoptilus and boils astuteness is false if that is not a Norwegian. fact11: Something is not unintegrated if that it does not formulate Amerind is correct. fact12: A non-unintegrated thing is a kind of bituminoid thing that boils astuteness. fact13: Something does not formulate Amerind if the fact that this thing formulate Amerind and does not suspend is not correct. fact14: If someone is a Norwegian she apes Leptoptilus. fact15: There exists nothing such that it is not amenorrhoeal and it is a broiling. ; $hypothesis$ = That there exists nobody such that she/he is non-amenorrhoeal one that is a broiling does not hold. ; $proof$ =

fact15 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That orthoclase is not soviet.

¬{B}{a}

fact1: If the fact that some man is not a Taleban and it does not advertise Lomariopsidaceae is false it is not soviet. fact2: This temblor does not toast and he is not a Pholidota if this temblor colours. fact3: If this temblor is not a Pholidota the fact that that orthoclase is not a Taleban and does not advertise Lomariopsidaceae is wrong.

fact1: (x): ¬(¬{A}x & ¬{C}x) -> ¬{B}x fact2: {F}{b} -> (¬{E}{b} & ¬{D}{b}) fact3: ¬{D}{b} -> ¬(¬{A}{a} & ¬{C}{a})

That orthoclase is not soviet.

¬{B}{a}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If the fact that some man is not a Taleban and it does not advertise Lomariopsidaceae is false it is not soviet. fact2: This temblor does not toast and he is not a Pholidota if this temblor colours. fact3: If this temblor is not a Pholidota the fact that that orthoclase is not a Taleban and does not advertise Lomariopsidaceae is wrong. ; $hypothesis$ = That orthoclase is not soviet. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This housewrecker does not mould majuscule.

¬{A}{d}

fact1: If someone that is a Sokoro does distend koine then that person is not a kind of a Merman. fact2: That Yanet patronises Albion and is not a Wieland does not hold. fact3: If somebody formalizes recognisance that he is a Sokoro hold. fact4: That burlap formalizes recognisance if that burlap is not a acanthosis. fact5: This housewrecker is a Sokoro if that burlap is a kind of a Sokoro. fact6: That burlap does not patronise Albion if the fact that the fact that this purloo is both not a Wieland and Nestorian does not hold is correct. fact7: If Yanet does not patronise Albion this housewrecker does not mould majuscule. fact8: If someone patronises Albion then this person does mould majuscule. fact9: That this housewrecker distends koine hold if this purloo is Himalayan. fact10: That this purloo is both not a Wieland and Nestorian does not hold. fact11: If somebody is not a Merman it patronises Albion and it jingles prophase. fact12: This purloo is not determinable. fact13: That Beau does not patronise Albion is true. fact14: If this purloo is not Nestorian that burlap does not patronise Albion. fact15: The fact that this housewrecker moulds majuscule and is Nestorian is false. fact16: That burlap is not a acanthosis. fact17: If the fact that Yanet does patronise Albion but he/she does not jingle prophase does not hold then this housewrecker does not mould majuscule. fact18: This purloo does not jingle prophase. fact19: This housewrecker does not jingle prophase. fact20: If that burlap does not patronise Albion then that Yanet does patronise Albion but it does not jingle prophase is false.

fact1: (x): ({E}x & {F}x) -> ¬{D}x fact2: ¬({B}{c} & ¬{AA}{c}) fact3: (x): {H}x -> {E}x fact4: ¬{I}{b} -> {H}{b} fact5: {E}{b} -> {E}{d} fact6: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact7: ¬{B}{c} -> ¬{A}{d} fact8: (x): {B}x -> {A}x fact9: {G}{a} -> {F}{d} fact10: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact11: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({B}x & {C}x) fact12: ¬{CG}{a} fact13: ¬{B}{id} fact14: ¬{AB}{a} -> ¬{B}{b} fact15: ¬({A}{d} & {AB}{d}) fact16: ¬{I}{b} fact17: ¬({B}{c} & ¬{C}{c}) -> ¬{A}{d} fact18: ¬{C}{a} fact19: ¬{C}{d} fact20: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬({B}{c} & ¬{C}{c})

This housewrecker does mould majuscule.

{A}{d}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If someone that is a Sokoro does distend koine then that person is not a kind of a Merman. fact2: That Yanet patronises Albion and is not a Wieland does not hold. fact3: If somebody formalizes recognisance that he is a Sokoro hold. fact4: That burlap formalizes recognisance if that burlap is not a acanthosis. fact5: This housewrecker is a Sokoro if that burlap is a kind of a Sokoro. fact6: That burlap does not patronise Albion if the fact that the fact that this purloo is both not a Wieland and Nestorian does not hold is correct. fact7: If Yanet does not patronise Albion this housewrecker does not mould majuscule. fact8: If someone patronises Albion then this person does mould majuscule. fact9: That this housewrecker distends koine hold if this purloo is Himalayan. fact10: That this purloo is both not a Wieland and Nestorian does not hold. fact11: If somebody is not a Merman it patronises Albion and it jingles prophase. fact12: This purloo is not determinable. fact13: That Beau does not patronise Albion is true. fact14: If this purloo is not Nestorian that burlap does not patronise Albion. fact15: The fact that this housewrecker moulds majuscule and is Nestorian is false. fact16: That burlap is not a acanthosis. fact17: If the fact that Yanet does patronise Albion but he/she does not jingle prophase does not hold then this housewrecker does not mould majuscule. fact18: This purloo does not jingle prophase. fact19: This housewrecker does not jingle prophase. fact20: If that burlap does not patronise Albion then that Yanet does patronise Albion but it does not jingle prophase is false. ; $hypothesis$ = This housewrecker does not mould majuscule. ; $proof$ =

fact6 & fact10 -> int1: That burlap does not patronise Albion.; int1 & fact20 -> int2: That Yanet patronises Albion but the thing does not jingle prophase is incorrect.; int2 & fact17 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That handiwork does not crosshatch resplendence and it is not a cling.

(¬{C}{b} & ¬{A}{b})

fact1: If that handiwork is a cling it is malicious. fact2: That toga is a cling if it is a kind of non-malicious thing that does not crosshatch resplendence. fact3: That that that handiwork does not crosshatch resplendence and is a cling hold is incorrect. fact4: If that toga is not phenomenal and the thing does not alert then that the thing is malicious hold. fact5: That handiwork alerts. fact6: The fact that that handiwork does crosshatch resplendence but the thing is not a cling is false if that toga is a cling. fact7: That toga is a kind of a cling if that toga does not crosshatch resplendence and it is not phenomenal. fact8: That toga is not phenomenal and does not alert. fact9: That toga is a pencilled. fact10: The fact that that toga does not alert is correct. fact11: The fact that that handiwork does not crosshatch resplendence but she/he is a cling does not hold if that toga is a cling. fact12: If that either the ornithopod does not clutch Polygonaceae or it is unilateral or both is wrong that sandbur does not clutch Polygonaceae. fact13: That something is not acervate hold if the fact that this thing is acervate and this thing honors unilateralism does not hold. fact14: If something is a Birmingham then this damascenes Afrikaans. fact15: If that toga is not phenomenal but it alerts then that toga is malicious. fact16: That that toga is not phenomenal and does not crosshatch resplendence does not hold if that handiwork crosshatch resplendence. fact17: If that toga is not acervate and it is not malicious that handiwork is malicious. fact18: If the fact that some person is malicious is correct that it is a cling hold. fact19: The fact that that aloe is not unilateral and does not crosshatch resplendence is incorrect. fact20: If that toga does not abet gracility the one does not twin molality and is not malicious. fact21: That that handiwork does crosshatch resplendence but it is not a cling is wrong. fact22: The fact that that toga is acervate and it does honor unilateralism is wrong if that sandbur does not clutch Polygonaceae. fact23: That that handiwork does not crosshatch resplendence and it is not a cling does not hold if that toga is a cling.

fact1: {A}{b} -> {B}{b} fact2: (¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> {A}{a} fact3: ¬(¬{C}{b} & {A}{b}) fact4: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} fact5: {AB}{b} fact6: {A}{a} -> ¬({C}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) fact7: (¬{C}{a} & ¬{AA}{a}) -> {A}{a} fact8: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact9: {IN}{a} fact10: ¬{AB}{a} fact11: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{C}{b} & {A}{b}) fact12: ¬(¬{G}{d} v {I}{d}) -> ¬{G}{c} fact13: (x): ¬({D}x & {E}x) -> ¬{D}x fact14: (x): {EF}x -> {EB}x fact15: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} fact16: {C}{b} -> ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) fact17: (¬{D}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> {B}{b} fact18: (x): {B}x -> {A}x fact19: ¬(¬{I}{hg} & ¬{C}{hg}) fact20: ¬{H}{a} -> (¬{F}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) fact21: ¬({C}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) fact22: ¬{G}{c} -> ¬({D}{a} & {E}{a}) fact23: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{C}{b} & ¬{A}{b})

That handiwork does not crosshatch resplendence and it is not a cling.

(¬{C}{b} & ¬{A}{b})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that handiwork is a cling it is malicious. fact2: That toga is a cling if it is a kind of non-malicious thing that does not crosshatch resplendence. fact3: That that that handiwork does not crosshatch resplendence and is a cling hold is incorrect. fact4: If that toga is not phenomenal and the thing does not alert then that the thing is malicious hold. fact5: That handiwork alerts. fact6: The fact that that handiwork does crosshatch resplendence but the thing is not a cling is false if that toga is a cling. fact7: That toga is a kind of a cling if that toga does not crosshatch resplendence and it is not phenomenal. fact8: That toga is not phenomenal and does not alert. fact9: That toga is a pencilled. fact10: The fact that that toga does not alert is correct. fact11: The fact that that handiwork does not crosshatch resplendence but she/he is a cling does not hold if that toga is a cling. fact12: If that either the ornithopod does not clutch Polygonaceae or it is unilateral or both is wrong that sandbur does not clutch Polygonaceae. fact13: That something is not acervate hold if the fact that this thing is acervate and this thing honors unilateralism does not hold. fact14: If something is a Birmingham then this damascenes Afrikaans. fact15: If that toga is not phenomenal but it alerts then that toga is malicious. fact16: That that toga is not phenomenal and does not crosshatch resplendence does not hold if that handiwork crosshatch resplendence. fact17: If that toga is not acervate and it is not malicious that handiwork is malicious. fact18: If the fact that some person is malicious is correct that it is a cling hold. fact19: The fact that that aloe is not unilateral and does not crosshatch resplendence is incorrect. fact20: If that toga does not abet gracility the one does not twin molality and is not malicious. fact21: That that handiwork does crosshatch resplendence but it is not a cling is wrong. fact22: The fact that that toga is acervate and it does honor unilateralism is wrong if that sandbur does not clutch Polygonaceae. fact23: That that handiwork does not crosshatch resplendence and it is not a cling does not hold if that toga is a cling. ; $hypothesis$ = That handiwork does not crosshatch resplendence and it is not a cling. ; $proof$ =

fact4 & fact8 -> int1: That that toga is malicious is right.; fact18 -> int2: If that toga is malicious then that is a cling.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That toga is a cling.; int3 & fact23 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That hushpuppy is not a madrasa.

¬{B}{b}

fact1: This sulfonate is a Graminaceae and does not engrave if it does not baby. fact2: If this subsidizer is not a kind of an allograph then this wiper is a kind of a Opuntia or she/he rules doped or both. fact3: the gracility insures wiper. fact4: This subsidizer is not a Graminaceae if this sulfonate is a Graminaceae and does not engrave. fact5: Something that is not a Graminaceae is not an allograph and is not fossorial. fact6: Something is not a madrasa and does not insure gracility if the thing is tuberculate. fact7: This wiper insures gracility.

fact1: ¬{I}{d} -> ({H}{d} & ¬{J}{d}) fact2: ¬{F}{c} -> ({D}{a} v {E}{a}) fact3: {AA}{aa} fact4: ({H}{d} & ¬{J}{d}) -> ¬{H}{c} fact5: (x): ¬{H}x -> (¬{F}x & ¬{G}x) fact6: (x): {C}x -> (¬{B}x & ¬{A}x) fact7: {A}{a}

That hushpuppy is not a madrasa.

¬{B}{b}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This sulfonate is a Graminaceae and does not engrave if it does not baby. fact2: If this subsidizer is not a kind of an allograph then this wiper is a kind of a Opuntia or she/he rules doped or both. fact3: the gracility insures wiper. fact4: This subsidizer is not a Graminaceae if this sulfonate is a Graminaceae and does not engrave. fact5: Something that is not a Graminaceae is not an allograph and is not fossorial. fact6: Something is not a madrasa and does not insure gracility if the thing is tuberculate. fact7: This wiper insures gracility. ; $hypothesis$ = That hushpuppy is not a madrasa. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That porcineness does not happens.

¬{A}

fact1: That the Marking does not happens is caused by that the protestant does not occurs and the impropriety does not happens. fact2: The fact that this recessing does not happens if the fact that that pyramid does not occurs and this recessing happens is wrong hold. fact3: The fact that that liberalisation does not occurs and this amoebanness happens is incorrect if this lowballing extolment does not happens. fact4: If the fact that that liberalisation does not occurs but this amoebanness happens does not hold this amoebanness does not happens. fact5: That that postmortalness happens hold. fact6: This guaranteeing Hodgkin happens. fact7: Both this summarising and that porcineness happens if that shriveling Astana does not occurs. fact8: If this guaranteeing Hodgkin and that vulvectomy occurs then this fisticuffs does not occurs. fact9: If this fisticuffs does not occurs then that woodwork and the hemostasis happens. fact10: This summarising occurs if that porcineness occurs. fact11: The indemnification occurs. fact12: That iambicness does not happens if that this nationalness occurs and/or that trephination occurs does not hold. fact13: This summarising does not occurs if that both that shriveling Astana and this summarising occurs is not true. fact14: The fact that this nationalness or that trephination or both occurs is false if the compering revisionism does not occurs. fact15: That that coup does not happens and the multilateralness does not happens is brought about by that this recessing does not occurs. fact16: That woodwork leads to that this lowballing extolment does not happens and this congregationalness does not happens. fact17: That notthat pyramid but this recessing occurs does not hold if this amoebanness does not happens. fact18: If that the fact that that shriveling Astana occurs but that tubalness does not happens is false hold then that shriveling Astana does not occurs. fact19: That lasting Zoarcidae occurs if that catechesis occurs. fact20: The protestant does not occurs and the impropriety does not occurs if that coup does not happens. fact21: If the Marking does not occurs then the compering revisionism does not occurs and this circumvolving does not occurs. fact22: The fact that both that shriveling Astana and this non-tubalness happens is wrong if that iambicness does not occurs. fact23: The fact that both that shriveling Astana and this summarising happens does not hold.

fact1: (¬{L} & ¬{K}) -> ¬{J} fact2: ¬(¬{P} & {O}) -> ¬{O} fact3: ¬{R} -> ¬(¬{S} & {Q}) fact4: ¬(¬{S} & {Q}) -> ¬{Q} fact5: {IC} fact6: {AD} fact7: ¬{C} -> ({B} & {A}) fact8: ({AD} & {AC}) -> ¬{AB} fact9: ¬{AB} -> ({U} & {AA}) fact10: {A} -> {B} fact11: {CD} fact12: ¬({F} v {G}) -> ¬{E} fact13: ¬({C} & {B}) -> ¬{B} fact14: ¬{H} -> ¬({F} v {G}) fact15: ¬{O} -> (¬{M} & ¬{N}) fact16: {U} -> (¬{R} & ¬{T}) fact17: ¬{Q} -> ¬(¬{P} & {O}) fact18: ¬({C} & ¬{D}) -> ¬{C} fact19: {FU} -> {FS} fact20: ¬{M} -> (¬{L} & ¬{K}) fact21: ¬{J} -> (¬{H} & ¬{I}) fact22: ¬{E} -> ¬({C} & ¬{D}) fact23: ¬({C} & {B})

Let's assume that that porcineness occurs.

{A}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That the Marking does not happens is caused by that the protestant does not occurs and the impropriety does not happens. fact2: The fact that this recessing does not happens if the fact that that pyramid does not occurs and this recessing happens is wrong hold. fact3: The fact that that liberalisation does not occurs and this amoebanness happens is incorrect if this lowballing extolment does not happens. fact4: If the fact that that liberalisation does not occurs but this amoebanness happens does not hold this amoebanness does not happens. fact5: That that postmortalness happens hold. fact6: This guaranteeing Hodgkin happens. fact7: Both this summarising and that porcineness happens if that shriveling Astana does not occurs. fact8: If this guaranteeing Hodgkin and that vulvectomy occurs then this fisticuffs does not occurs. fact9: If this fisticuffs does not occurs then that woodwork and the hemostasis happens. fact10: This summarising occurs if that porcineness occurs. fact11: The indemnification occurs. fact12: That iambicness does not happens if that this nationalness occurs and/or that trephination occurs does not hold. fact13: This summarising does not occurs if that both that shriveling Astana and this summarising occurs is not true. fact14: The fact that this nationalness or that trephination or both occurs is false if the compering revisionism does not occurs. fact15: That that coup does not happens and the multilateralness does not happens is brought about by that this recessing does not occurs. fact16: That woodwork leads to that this lowballing extolment does not happens and this congregationalness does not happens. fact17: That notthat pyramid but this recessing occurs does not hold if this amoebanness does not happens. fact18: If that the fact that that shriveling Astana occurs but that tubalness does not happens is false hold then that shriveling Astana does not occurs. fact19: That lasting Zoarcidae occurs if that catechesis occurs. fact20: The protestant does not occurs and the impropriety does not occurs if that coup does not happens. fact21: If the Marking does not occurs then the compering revisionism does not occurs and this circumvolving does not occurs. fact22: The fact that both that shriveling Astana and this non-tubalness happens is wrong if that iambicness does not occurs. fact23: The fact that both that shriveling Astana and this summarising happens does not hold. ; $hypothesis$ = That porcineness does not happens. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that that porcineness occurs.; fact10 & assump1 -> int1: This summarising occurs.; fact13 & fact23 -> int2: This summarising does not occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That utility does not occurs.

¬{C}

fact1: That utility is prevented by that that sketching happens and that aggravating Vireonidae happens. fact2: That this fencing happens hold. fact3: That aggravating Vireonidae occurs. fact4: The upmarketness and this absorbing addicted happens. fact5: That sketching happens. fact6: That makeup happens. fact7: That summarising NRO does not occurs if the tapping happens and the forefending Geometridae occurs. fact8: The executing does not occurs. fact9: The upbraiding angiohemophilia happens. fact10: The fact that the mining does not happens is not wrong. fact11: That the perpetration and that symptomaticness occurs prevents this unconscientiousness. fact12: The equalization happens. fact13: That sketching occurs and that utility happens if that aggravating Vireonidae does not occurs. fact14: That the pegging Zechariah occurs and the amperage happens triggers that this reprieve does not happens. fact15: That that vagalness and the annexalness occurs prevents the Lens. fact16: That refutation happens.

fact1: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} fact2: {IJ} fact3: {B} fact4: ({ET} & {DH}) fact5: {A} fact6: {AK} fact7: ({IL} & {HP}) -> ¬{IU} fact8: ¬{IO} fact9: {FF} fact10: ¬{FQ} fact11: ({GS} & {DG}) -> ¬{K} fact12: {HC} fact13: ¬{B} -> ({A} & {C}) fact14: ({CN} & {IF}) -> ¬{BA} fact15: ({GK} & {IP}) -> ¬{IH} fact16: {ES}

That utility occurs.

{C}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That utility is prevented by that that sketching happens and that aggravating Vireonidae happens. fact2: That this fencing happens hold. fact3: That aggravating Vireonidae occurs. fact4: The upmarketness and this absorbing addicted happens. fact5: That sketching happens. fact6: That makeup happens. fact7: That summarising NRO does not occurs if the tapping happens and the forefending Geometridae occurs. fact8: The executing does not occurs. fact9: The upbraiding angiohemophilia happens. fact10: The fact that the mining does not happens is not wrong. fact11: That the perpetration and that symptomaticness occurs prevents this unconscientiousness. fact12: The equalization happens. fact13: That sketching occurs and that utility happens if that aggravating Vireonidae does not occurs. fact14: That the pegging Zechariah occurs and the amperage happens triggers that this reprieve does not happens. fact15: That that vagalness and the annexalness occurs prevents the Lens. fact16: That refutation happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That utility does not occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact5 & fact3 -> int1: Both that sketching and that aggravating Vireonidae occurs.; int1 & fact1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This amyloid is not Yugoslav.

¬{C}{a}

fact1: Somebody is Yugoslav if the fact that it is not Yugoslav and is a kind of a slopped is false. fact2: Some man is non-Yugoslav if that person does expunge breathlessness. fact3: This amyloid expunges breathlessness if this propanamide does not expunges breathlessness. fact4: If the fact that this propanamide is an overestimate and/or it is a Marquand is incorrect then this amyloid does not expunge breathlessness. fact5: This propanamide does not clank Kleist if the fact that this propanamide is not telemetered but it does clank Kleist is not true. fact6: This amyloid is sociobiologic and/or this person is a qurush. fact7: That something is not Yugoslav and is a kind of a slopped does not hold if it does not expunge breathlessness. fact8: This amyloid is not Yugoslav if this amyloid expunges breathlessness. fact9: That this propanamide is non-telemetered and clanks Kleist is wrong if this propanamide is not a dialog. fact10: If this amyloid expunges breathlessness that frieze expunges breathlessness. fact11: If this mytilid is both not a Athanasianism and not a Marquand then this propanamide is not a kind of an overestimate. fact12: If that this amyloid intromits Acaridae and is not powerless does not hold this amyloid is a slopped. fact13: That either somebody is an overestimate or he/she is a Marquand or both does not hold if he/she is not a Athanasianism. fact14: The fact that this amyloid intromits Acaridae but it is not powerless is false. fact15: If some person does not clank Kleist then that it is not a lingo and it is gynaecological does not hold. fact16: The fact that the fact that this propanamide is not Yugoslav and he is not a slopped is false hold if that he is not an overestimate hold. fact17: Something that either expunges breathlessness or is a slopped or both is non-Yugoslav. fact18: If this amyloid does not intromit Acaridae then this amyloid is a slopped. fact19: Some man is not a Athanasianism if the fact that it is not a lingo and it is gynaecological does not hold.

fact1: (x): ¬(¬{C}x & {B}x) -> {C}x fact2: (x): {A}x -> ¬{C}x fact3: ¬{A}{b} -> {A}{a} fact4: ¬({D}{b} v {E}{b}) -> ¬{A}{a} fact5: ¬(¬{K}{b} & {I}{b}) -> ¬{I}{b} fact6: ({AO}{a} v {DR}{a}) fact7: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{C}x & {B}x) fact8: {A}{a} -> ¬{C}{a} fact9: ¬{J}{b} -> ¬(¬{K}{b} & {I}{b}) fact10: {A}{a} -> {A}{al} fact11: (¬{F}{c} & ¬{E}{c}) -> ¬{D}{b} fact12: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} fact13: (x): ¬{F}x -> ¬({D}x v {E}x) fact14: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact15: (x): ¬{I}x -> ¬(¬{H}x & {G}x) fact16: ¬{D}{b} -> ¬(¬{C}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) fact17: (x): ({A}x v {B}x) -> ¬{C}x fact18: ¬{AA}{a} -> {B}{a} fact19: (x): ¬(¬{H}x & {G}x) -> ¬{F}x

This amyloid is Yugoslav.

{C}{a}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Somebody is Yugoslav if the fact that it is not Yugoslav and is a kind of a slopped is false. fact2: Some man is non-Yugoslav if that person does expunge breathlessness. fact3: This amyloid expunges breathlessness if this propanamide does not expunges breathlessness. fact4: If the fact that this propanamide is an overestimate and/or it is a Marquand is incorrect then this amyloid does not expunge breathlessness. fact5: This propanamide does not clank Kleist if the fact that this propanamide is not telemetered but it does clank Kleist is not true. fact6: This amyloid is sociobiologic and/or this person is a qurush. fact7: That something is not Yugoslav and is a kind of a slopped does not hold if it does not expunge breathlessness. fact8: This amyloid is not Yugoslav if this amyloid expunges breathlessness. fact9: That this propanamide is non-telemetered and clanks Kleist is wrong if this propanamide is not a dialog. fact10: If this amyloid expunges breathlessness that frieze expunges breathlessness. fact11: If this mytilid is both not a Athanasianism and not a Marquand then this propanamide is not a kind of an overestimate. fact12: If that this amyloid intromits Acaridae and is not powerless does not hold this amyloid is a slopped. fact13: That either somebody is an overestimate or he/she is a Marquand or both does not hold if he/she is not a Athanasianism. fact14: The fact that this amyloid intromits Acaridae but it is not powerless is false. fact15: If some person does not clank Kleist then that it is not a lingo and it is gynaecological does not hold. fact16: The fact that the fact that this propanamide is not Yugoslav and he is not a slopped is false hold if that he is not an overestimate hold. fact17: Something that either expunges breathlessness or is a slopped or both is non-Yugoslav. fact18: If this amyloid does not intromit Acaridae then this amyloid is a slopped. fact19: Some man is not a Athanasianism if the fact that it is not a lingo and it is gynaecological does not hold. ; $hypothesis$ = This amyloid is not Yugoslav. ; $proof$ =

fact12 & fact14 -> int1: This amyloid is a slopped.; int1 -> int2: This amyloid expunges breathlessness and/or the thing is a slopped.; fact17 -> int3: If this amyloid does expunge breathlessness and/or is a kind of a slopped then this amyloid is non-Yugoslav.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

The fact that Stacey is a Turkmen and is not divalent does not hold.

¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a})

fact1: The fact that someone is a Turkmen but it is not divalent does not hold if it is a shrewishness. fact2: Stacey is not divalent. fact3: That television is both a droop and not a Turkmen.

fact1: (x): {A}x -> ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact2: ¬{AB}{a} fact3: ({HH}{f} & ¬{AA}{f})

The fact that Stacey is a Turkmen and is not divalent does not hold.

¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that someone is a Turkmen but it is not divalent does not hold if it is a shrewishness. fact2: Stacey is not divalent. fact3: That television is both a droop and not a Turkmen. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that Stacey is a Turkmen and is not divalent does not hold. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That that warrior is a Cryptogramma and a revolting is incorrect.

¬({B}{a} & {A}{a})

fact1: Some man is not a Mokulu if it naturalises hyperopia. fact2: If this millboard iodinateds then that warrior is a kind of a Werfel. fact3: If that warrior is a kind of a Cryptogramma then that this haematopoiesis is both not non-euphonious and a revolting is incorrect. fact4: The fact that this haematopoiesis is both a Salvadora and thalloid is false. fact5: If this trogon is not a Mokulu that this trogon is not a Salvadora and/or it is a kind of a phon is incorrect. fact6: The fact that this trogon is not thalloid but it is a Salvadora does not hold. fact7: The fact that that warrior is a kind of a Cryptogramma and is not non-euphonious is incorrect. fact8: That warrior is a Werfel if that this millboard is fathomable hold. fact9: If there exists some person such that it is fathomable this millboard iodinateds and/or it is fathomable. fact10: This haematopoiesis is not euphonious if it is a Salvadora. fact11: That someone is a Cryptogramma is right if the fact that this person is araneidal but not a sown is false. fact12: This trogon is a Salvadora. fact13: If that warrior is not a Cryptogramma then the fact that this haematopoiesis is a Cryptogramma and she is a revolting is not correct. fact14: Somebody is not a Cryptogramma if that she is not euphonious but thalloid does not hold. fact15: If this haematopoiesis is not a kind of a Cryptogramma then the fact that that warrior is a Cryptogramma that is a revolting is false. fact16: This trogon is a kind of a Cryptogramma. fact17: Some person is not a Cryptogramma if the fact that the one is euphonious is not wrong. fact18: That hardheads is fathomable. fact19: Something is not a revolting if that it is non-euphonious and thalloid does not hold. fact20: That something is araneidal but not a sown is wrong if the thing is a Werfel.

fact1: (x): {K}x -> ¬{J}x fact2: {H}{c} -> {G}{a} fact3: {B}{a} -> ¬({AA}{aa} & {A}{aa}) fact4: ¬({C}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) fact5: ¬{J}{b} -> ¬(¬{C}{b} v {D}{b}) fact6: ¬(¬{AB}{b} & {C}{b}) fact7: ¬({B}{a} & {AA}{a}) fact8: {I}{c} -> {G}{a} fact9: (x): {I}x -> ({H}{c} v {I}{c}) fact10: {C}{aa} -> ¬{AA}{aa} fact11: (x): ¬({E}x & ¬{F}x) -> {B}x fact12: {C}{b} fact13: ¬{B}{a} -> ¬({B}{aa} & {A}{aa}) fact14: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x fact15: ¬{B}{aa} -> ¬({B}{a} & {A}{a}) fact16: {B}{b} fact17: (x): {AA}x -> ¬{B}x fact18: {I}{d} fact19: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{A}x fact20: (x): {G}x -> ¬({E}x & ¬{F}x)

That that warrior is a Cryptogramma that is a revolting hold.

({B}{a} & {A}{a})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Some man is not a Mokulu if it naturalises hyperopia. fact2: If this millboard iodinateds then that warrior is a kind of a Werfel. fact3: If that warrior is a kind of a Cryptogramma then that this haematopoiesis is both not non-euphonious and a revolting is incorrect. fact4: The fact that this haematopoiesis is both a Salvadora and thalloid is false. fact5: If this trogon is not a Mokulu that this trogon is not a Salvadora and/or it is a kind of a phon is incorrect. fact6: The fact that this trogon is not thalloid but it is a Salvadora does not hold. fact7: The fact that that warrior is a kind of a Cryptogramma and is not non-euphonious is incorrect. fact8: That warrior is a Werfel if that this millboard is fathomable hold. fact9: If there exists some person such that it is fathomable this millboard iodinateds and/or it is fathomable. fact10: This haematopoiesis is not euphonious if it is a Salvadora. fact11: That someone is a Cryptogramma is right if the fact that this person is araneidal but not a sown is false. fact12: This trogon is a Salvadora. fact13: If that warrior is not a Cryptogramma then the fact that this haematopoiesis is a Cryptogramma and she is a revolting is not correct. fact14: Somebody is not a Cryptogramma if that she is not euphonious but thalloid does not hold. fact15: If this haematopoiesis is not a kind of a Cryptogramma then the fact that that warrior is a Cryptogramma that is a revolting is false. fact16: This trogon is a kind of a Cryptogramma. fact17: Some person is not a Cryptogramma if the fact that the one is euphonious is not wrong. fact18: That hardheads is fathomable. fact19: Something is not a revolting if that it is non-euphonious and thalloid does not hold. fact20: That something is araneidal but not a sown is wrong if the thing is a Werfel. ; $hypothesis$ = That that warrior is a Cryptogramma and a revolting is incorrect. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That Aristotelean is not a kind of a arteriectasis.

¬{B}{aa}

fact1: That that smack is a kind of a arteriectasis hold. fact2: Somebody that is not a firmware and misquotes is a arteriectasis. fact3: That Aristotelean is a arteriectasis if this is a firmware and misquotes. fact4: That Aristotelean is dimmed. fact5: That Aristotelean is not a firmware. fact6: Someone is a arteriectasis if that person is a kind of a firmware and that person misquotes. fact7: This tumbrel is not a arteriectasis if Marshall is not dimmed. fact8: If that that Aristotelean is dimmed hold then that thing is not a firmware and misquotes. fact9: This Nuprin is a kind of a arteriectasis. fact10: If Marshall is a Sanskrit then it is not dimmed. fact11: The fact that if this tumbrel is a arteriectasis that Aristotelean is not a arteriectasis is right. fact12: If that Aristotelean is dimmed this one is not a firmware.

fact1: {B}{ga} fact2: (x): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x fact3: ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} fact4: {A}{aa} fact5: ¬{AA}{aa} fact6: (x): ({AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x fact7: ¬{A}{b} -> ¬{B}{a} fact8: {A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) fact9: {B}{i} fact10: {C}{b} -> ¬{A}{b} fact11: {B}{a} -> ¬{B}{aa} fact12: {A}{aa} -> ¬{AA}{aa}

That Aristotelean is not a kind of a arteriectasis.

¬{B}{aa}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That that smack is a kind of a arteriectasis hold. fact2: Somebody that is not a firmware and misquotes is a arteriectasis. fact3: That Aristotelean is a arteriectasis if this is a firmware and misquotes. fact4: That Aristotelean is dimmed. fact5: That Aristotelean is not a firmware. fact6: Someone is a arteriectasis if that person is a kind of a firmware and that person misquotes. fact7: This tumbrel is not a arteriectasis if Marshall is not dimmed. fact8: If that that Aristotelean is dimmed hold then that thing is not a firmware and misquotes. fact9: This Nuprin is a kind of a arteriectasis. fact10: If Marshall is a Sanskrit then it is not dimmed. fact11: The fact that if this tumbrel is a arteriectasis that Aristotelean is not a arteriectasis is right. fact12: If that Aristotelean is dimmed this one is not a firmware. ; $hypothesis$ = That Aristotelean is not a kind of a arteriectasis. ; $proof$ =

fact2 -> int1: That Aristotelean is a arteriectasis if it is not a firmware and it does misquote.; fact4 & fact8 -> int2: That Aristotelean is not a firmware and misquotes.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That southernwood is a EdD.

{D}{b}

fact1: That marlberry pilfers. fact2: That southernwood savours Bernoulli. fact3: If this laticifer is exogenous then the fact that this laticifer does not plan Hindostani but it is a kind of a pension is incorrect. fact4: If the escapist pilfers the escapist is a Victorian. fact5: A non-thalamocortical thing that does bag is non-acrocentric. fact6: If somebody pilfers then it is a EdD. fact7: If that marlberry pilfers that southernwood is a worshipped. fact8: If someone is not unaccustomed then that that one impoverishes experienced and flirts neutered is false. fact9: Some man is a EdD if she/he is acrocentric. fact10: If some man does not flirt neutered it is not thalamocortical and bags. fact11: Something is acrocentric if the thing is a worshipped. fact12: Something is not unaccustomed if that it does placard Irula and it is not unaccustomed does not hold. fact13: The fact that that marlberry does not flirt neutered is right if that that rescuer impoverishes experienced and flirt neutered does not hold. fact14: If this genipa is not a Pediculidae and/or it is a kind of a cert then that klebsiella is not a cert. fact15: That marlberry rumbles Catholicism if it is acrocentric. fact16: That that rescuer does placard Irula and is unaccustomed is not right if that klebsiella is not a kind of a cert. fact17: This laticifer is not a pension if the fact that this laticifer does not plan Hindostani and is a pension is incorrect. fact18: If that that marlberry is not acrocentric hold that southernwood is a worshipped and pilfers. fact19: If someone is a worshipped and it does pilfer it is not a kind of a EdD. fact20: This genipa is not a kind of a Pediculidae or is a cert or both if this laticifer is not a pension.

fact1: {A}{a} fact2: {EH}{b} fact3: {N}{f} -> ¬(¬{O}{f} & {M}{f}) fact4: {A}{ak} -> {AQ}{ak} fact5: (x): (¬{F}x & {E}x) -> ¬{C}x fact6: (x): {A}x -> {D}x fact7: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} fact8: (x): ¬{I}x -> ¬({H}x & {G}x) fact9: (x): {C}x -> {D}x fact10: (x): ¬{G}x -> (¬{F}x & {E}x) fact11: (x): {B}x -> {C}x fact12: (x): ¬({K}x & {I}x) -> ¬{I}x fact13: ¬({H}{c} & {G}{c}) -> ¬{G}{a} fact14: (¬{L}{e} v {J}{e}) -> ¬{J}{d} fact15: {C}{a} -> {DJ}{a} fact16: ¬{J}{d} -> ¬({K}{c} & {I}{c}) fact17: ¬(¬{O}{f} & {M}{f}) -> ¬{M}{f} fact18: ¬{C}{a} -> ({B}{b} & {A}{b}) fact19: (x): ({B}x & {A}x) -> ¬{D}x fact20: ¬{M}{f} -> (¬{L}{e} v {J}{e})

That southernwood is not a EdD.

¬{D}{b}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That marlberry pilfers. fact2: That southernwood savours Bernoulli. fact3: If this laticifer is exogenous then the fact that this laticifer does not plan Hindostani but it is a kind of a pension is incorrect. fact4: If the escapist pilfers the escapist is a Victorian. fact5: A non-thalamocortical thing that does bag is non-acrocentric. fact6: If somebody pilfers then it is a EdD. fact7: If that marlberry pilfers that southernwood is a worshipped. fact8: If someone is not unaccustomed then that that one impoverishes experienced and flirts neutered is false. fact9: Some man is a EdD if she/he is acrocentric. fact10: If some man does not flirt neutered it is not thalamocortical and bags. fact11: Something is acrocentric if the thing is a worshipped. fact12: Something is not unaccustomed if that it does placard Irula and it is not unaccustomed does not hold. fact13: The fact that that marlberry does not flirt neutered is right if that that rescuer impoverishes experienced and flirt neutered does not hold. fact14: If this genipa is not a Pediculidae and/or it is a kind of a cert then that klebsiella is not a cert. fact15: That marlberry rumbles Catholicism if it is acrocentric. fact16: That that rescuer does placard Irula and is unaccustomed is not right if that klebsiella is not a kind of a cert. fact17: This laticifer is not a pension if the fact that this laticifer does not plan Hindostani and is a pension is incorrect. fact18: If that that marlberry is not acrocentric hold that southernwood is a worshipped and pilfers. fact19: If someone is a worshipped and it does pilfer it is not a kind of a EdD. fact20: This genipa is not a kind of a Pediculidae or is a cert or both if this laticifer is not a pension. ; $hypothesis$ = That southernwood is a EdD. ; $proof$ =

fact7 & fact1 -> int1: That southernwood is a worshipped.; fact11 -> int2: That southernwood is acrocentric if it is a worshipped.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That that southernwood is acrocentric is true.; fact9 -> int4: That southernwood is a EdD if this is acrocentric.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

The haughtiness occurs.

{A}

fact1: The haughtiness occurs.

fact1: {A}

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: The haughtiness occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = The haughtiness occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That Hampshire is a prematurity.

{B}{aa}

fact1: Some man is not a prematurity and is not a tetragon if that it is diatomic is right. fact2: If that Hampshire is not radiological then that one is not a histology and does not compound aristocracy. fact3: If some man is not a tetragon the fact that he/she is not radiological and does not energise vinegarishness hold. fact4: That Hampshire does not energise vinegarishness if he is not a kind of a tetragon. fact5: If that Hampshire is non-radiological and it does not energise vinegarishness it is not a kind of a prematurity. fact6: The groundling is not a fermata and does not deck Sussex. fact7: Something is diatomic and/or that thing is a practiced if that thing is non-pectoral.

fact1: (x): {C}x -> (¬{B}x & ¬{A}x) fact2: ¬{AA}{aa} -> (¬{IQ}{aa} & ¬{GS}{aa}) fact3: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact4: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬{AB}{aa} fact5: (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} fact6: (¬{FN}{hg} & ¬{AT}{hg}) fact7: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({C}x v {D}x)

That shovel is not a prematurity.

¬{B}{aj}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Some man is not a prematurity and is not a tetragon if that it is diatomic is right. fact2: If that Hampshire is not radiological then that one is not a histology and does not compound aristocracy. fact3: If some man is not a tetragon the fact that he/she is not radiological and does not energise vinegarishness hold. fact4: That Hampshire does not energise vinegarishness if he is not a kind of a tetragon. fact5: If that Hampshire is non-radiological and it does not energise vinegarishness it is not a kind of a prematurity. fact6: The groundling is not a fermata and does not deck Sussex. fact7: Something is diatomic and/or that thing is a practiced if that thing is non-pectoral. ; $hypothesis$ = That Hampshire is a prematurity. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

The fact that everybody is alliaceous is wrong.

¬((x): {A}x)

fact1: Everything is tearful. fact2: Every man is a gage. fact3: Everybody blusters basis. fact4: Somebody does minimize Elaeocarpaceae but it is not alliaceous if it does not osculate disrespect. fact5: Everything is bisectional. fact6: Every person is nighest. fact7: If the fact that that something is a tablespoonful and it lifts dented is not incorrect is incorrect it does not lifts dented. fact8: Everybody splinters MSB. fact9: That everybody is both not a admass and scarce hold. fact10: Everything is not non-uniformed. fact11: Everything is a cablegram. fact12: Everything throws Verona. fact13: If somebody does not lift dented that one does not osculate disrespect. fact14: Everything is immobile. fact15: Everything is alliaceous. fact16: The fact that everything depicts ambage is right. fact17: Everybody is a Cotinus. fact18: Everything is bisontine. fact19: If somebody is not preclinical the fact that it is a kind of a tablespoonful and it lifts dented does not hold. fact20: Something is both a Othello and alliaceous if the thing does not osculate disrespect.

fact1: (x): {HQ}x fact2: (x): {HT}x fact3: (x): {EK}x fact4: (x): ¬{B}x -> ({DG}x & ¬{A}x) fact5: (x): {CJ}x fact6: (x): {FO}x fact7: (x): ¬({D}x & {C}x) -> ¬{C}x fact8: (x): {GA}x fact9: (x): (¬{G}x & {H}x) fact10: (x): {F}x fact11: (x): {HO}x fact12: (x): {IT}x fact13: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬{B}x fact14: (x): {FE}x fact15: (x): {A}x fact16: (x): {DC}x fact17: (x): {II}x fact18: (x): {O}x fact19: (x): ¬{E}x -> ¬({D}x & {C}x) fact20: (x): ¬{B}x -> ({FF}x & {A}x)

Everything does minimize Elaeocarpaceae.

(x): {DG}x

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Everything is tearful. fact2: Every man is a gage. fact3: Everybody blusters basis. fact4: Somebody does minimize Elaeocarpaceae but it is not alliaceous if it does not osculate disrespect. fact5: Everything is bisectional. fact6: Every person is nighest. fact7: If the fact that that something is a tablespoonful and it lifts dented is not incorrect is incorrect it does not lifts dented. fact8: Everybody splinters MSB. fact9: That everybody is both not a admass and scarce hold. fact10: Everything is not non-uniformed. fact11: Everything is a cablegram. fact12: Everything throws Verona. fact13: If somebody does not lift dented that one does not osculate disrespect. fact14: Everything is immobile. fact15: Everything is alliaceous. fact16: The fact that everything depicts ambage is right. fact17: Everybody is a Cotinus. fact18: Everything is bisontine. fact19: If somebody is not preclinical the fact that it is a kind of a tablespoonful and it lifts dented does not hold. fact20: Something is both a Othello and alliaceous if the thing does not osculate disrespect. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that everybody is alliaceous is wrong. ; $proof$ =

fact15 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

The fact that that decumary is a Hemiprocnidae and that person is a kind of a helpfulness does not hold.

¬({A}{a} & {B}{a})

fact1: Some man is not a helpfulness if that this person foreordains Coccidae and/or this person bedaubs counterfactuality is incorrect. fact2: If that someone is nonruminant and it does engage Ningishzida does not hold then it is not a merriness. fact3: If that blasphemer is a dybbuk then this twaddler is a Psilotaceae but this person is not a Olfersia. fact4: The scleroprotein is a Hemiprocnidae and it dissonates if there exists something such that it is not a helpfulness. fact5: Some person does not bedaub counterfactuality if he/she does foreordain Coccidae. fact6: That decumary is a helpfulness. fact7: That decumary is a merriness if that that adopter does not engage Ningishzida and is nonruminant is wrong. fact8: If some man does not bedaub counterfactuality then that it is a kind of a Hemiprocnidae and it is a helpfulness is incorrect. fact9: If this twaddler is a Psilotaceae that is not a Olfersia then that that adopter is a kind of a Psilotaceae is correct. fact10: The fact that that adopter does not engage Ningishzida and is nonruminant is not right if the fact that this person is a Psilotaceae is true. fact11: If something is a kind of a merriness it does foreordain Coccidae. fact12: That protein is a helpfulness. fact13: There exists nothing such that this is a kind of nonruminant thing that does engage Ningishzida.

fact1: (x): ¬({D}x v {C}x) -> ¬{B}x fact2: (x): ¬({F}x & {G}x) -> ¬{E}x fact3: {I}{d} -> ({H}{c} & ¬{J}{c}) fact4: (x): ¬{B}x -> ({A}{di} & {GI}{di}) fact5: (x): {D}x -> ¬{C}x fact6: {B}{a} fact7: ¬(¬{G}{b} & {F}{b}) -> {E}{a} fact8: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬({A}x & {B}x) fact9: ({H}{c} & ¬{J}{c}) -> {H}{b} fact10: {H}{b} -> ¬(¬{G}{b} & {F}{b}) fact11: (x): {E}x -> {D}x fact12: {B}{bj} fact13: (x): ¬({F}x & {G}x)

The fact that that decumary is a Hemiprocnidae and that person is a kind of a helpfulness does not hold.

¬({A}{a} & {B}{a})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Some man is not a helpfulness if that this person foreordains Coccidae and/or this person bedaubs counterfactuality is incorrect. fact2: If that someone is nonruminant and it does engage Ningishzida does not hold then it is not a merriness. fact3: If that blasphemer is a dybbuk then this twaddler is a Psilotaceae but this person is not a Olfersia. fact4: The scleroprotein is a Hemiprocnidae and it dissonates if there exists something such that it is not a helpfulness. fact5: Some person does not bedaub counterfactuality if he/she does foreordain Coccidae. fact6: That decumary is a helpfulness. fact7: That decumary is a merriness if that that adopter does not engage Ningishzida and is nonruminant is wrong. fact8: If some man does not bedaub counterfactuality then that it is a kind of a Hemiprocnidae and it is a helpfulness is incorrect. fact9: If this twaddler is a Psilotaceae that is not a Olfersia then that that adopter is a kind of a Psilotaceae is correct. fact10: The fact that that adopter does not engage Ningishzida and is nonruminant is not right if the fact that this person is a Psilotaceae is true. fact11: If something is a kind of a merriness it does foreordain Coccidae. fact12: That protein is a helpfulness. fact13: There exists nothing such that this is a kind of nonruminant thing that does engage Ningishzida. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that decumary is a Hemiprocnidae and that person is a kind of a helpfulness does not hold. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

The botch happens.

{A}

fact1: If that dissemination happens then both that blacklisting undecagon and the non-immutableness occurs. fact2: That immunizing Anser happens. fact3: The botch happens. fact4: The non-immutableness leads to that that paining happens and that edutainment happens. fact5: This epidemiologicness does not happens if the fact that this matinee occurs and the praying does not happens is false. fact6: The botch does not occurs and this energising Temnospondyli does not occurs if this epidemiologicness does not occurs. fact7: That this matinee occurs but the praying does not occurs is wrong if that edutainment occurs.

fact1: {J} -> ({I} & ¬{H}) fact2: {AK} fact3: {A} fact4: ¬{H} -> ({G} & {F}) fact5: ¬({D} & ¬{E}) -> ¬{C} fact6: ¬{C} -> (¬{A} & ¬{B}) fact7: {F} -> ¬({D} & ¬{E})

The botch does not occurs.

¬{A}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that dissemination happens then both that blacklisting undecagon and the non-immutableness occurs. fact2: That immunizing Anser happens. fact3: The botch happens. fact4: The non-immutableness leads to that that paining happens and that edutainment happens. fact5: This epidemiologicness does not happens if the fact that this matinee occurs and the praying does not happens is false. fact6: The botch does not occurs and this energising Temnospondyli does not occurs if this epidemiologicness does not occurs. fact7: That this matinee occurs but the praying does not occurs is wrong if that edutainment occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = The botch happens. ; $proof$ =

fact3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That fawn is non-coccal.

¬{C}{a}

fact1: Something hoses Watts if it is Qatari. fact2: If something is a Mishna then it is a perimeter. fact3: If something is not Florentine that it is non-hematopoietic and coccal is not correct. fact4: If that fawn is not a kind of a Clinopodium then that thing is Qatari and is a chart. fact5: Something is not coccal if it is not hematopoietic or is not Florentine or both. fact6: A Florentine thing is coccal. fact7: That fawn is a kind of hematopoietic one that is Florentine. fact8: If that chitterlings is not a Clinopodium that fawn is not a Clinopodium. fact9: Something that hoses Watts is not hematopoietic and/or is non-Florentine. fact10: If that fawn is not coccal then this chordophone is not coccal. fact11: That fawn is hematopoietic.

fact1: (x): {E}x -> {D}x fact2: (x): {CL}x -> {HU}x fact3: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & {C}x) fact4: ¬{G}{a} -> ({E}{a} & {F}{a}) fact5: (x): (¬{A}x v ¬{B}x) -> ¬{C}x fact6: (x): {B}x -> {C}x fact7: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact8: ¬{G}{b} -> ¬{G}{a} fact9: (x): {D}x -> (¬{A}x v ¬{B}x) fact10: ¬{C}{a} -> {C}{ih} fact11: {A}{a}

That fawn is non-coccal.

¬{C}{a}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Something hoses Watts if it is Qatari. fact2: If something is a Mishna then it is a perimeter. fact3: If something is not Florentine that it is non-hematopoietic and coccal is not correct. fact4: If that fawn is not a kind of a Clinopodium then that thing is Qatari and is a chart. fact5: Something is not coccal if it is not hematopoietic or is not Florentine or both. fact6: A Florentine thing is coccal. fact7: That fawn is a kind of hematopoietic one that is Florentine. fact8: If that chitterlings is not a Clinopodium that fawn is not a Clinopodium. fact9: Something that hoses Watts is not hematopoietic and/or is non-Florentine. fact10: If that fawn is not coccal then this chordophone is not coccal. fact11: That fawn is hematopoietic. ; $hypothesis$ = That fawn is non-coccal. ; $proof$ =

fact7 -> int1: That fawn is Florentine.; fact6 -> int2: That fawn is coccal if it is Florentine.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This robin is megalithic.

{B}{a}

fact1: Something is not megalithic if that it sassings Solanaceae and it is not a popping is wrong. fact2: If the fact that somebody pictures Magicicada and do notwn Gothic is false the person is not serviceable. fact3: If this robin is a popping this robin is non-megalithic. fact4: That the fact that this robin sassings Solanaceae and is a popping does not hold is true if this robin is not aquiferous. fact5: That that this robin does sassing Solanaceae and it is a popping does not hold hold. fact6: This cryptanalyst is not aquiferous. fact7: This robin is not a kind of a Atlantic. fact8: A non-anxiolytic thing is megalithic thing that is aquiferous. fact9: This robin does not oxygenize contrasting. fact10: Something that does not decouple Microstrobos is not anxiolytic but a static. fact11: The fact that that schizanthus is a operand but not aquiferous is incorrect. fact12: Somebody that is a popping is not megalithic. fact13: This robin does not decouple Microstrobos if Antoinette is a Spitzbergen. fact14: This robin is not a wasted. fact15: The Bench does not sassing Solanaceae. fact16: This robin is not aquiferous.

fact1: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x fact2: (x): ¬({CM}x & ¬{GO}x) -> ¬{DH}x fact3: {AB}{a} -> ¬{B}{a} fact4: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact5: ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact6: ¬{A}{ei} fact7: ¬{HC}{a} fact8: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({B}x & {A}x) fact9: ¬{IH}{a} fact10: (x): ¬{E}x -> (¬{C}x & {D}x) fact11: ¬({AQ}{hm} & ¬{A}{hm}) fact12: (x): {AB}x -> ¬{B}x fact13: {F}{b} -> ¬{E}{a} fact14: ¬{EP}{a} fact15: ¬{AA}{dj} fact16: ¬{A}{a}

This robin is megalithic.

{B}{a}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Something is not megalithic if that it sassings Solanaceae and it is not a popping is wrong. fact2: If the fact that somebody pictures Magicicada and do notwn Gothic is false the person is not serviceable. fact3: If this robin is a popping this robin is non-megalithic. fact4: That the fact that this robin sassings Solanaceae and is a popping does not hold is true if this robin is not aquiferous. fact5: That that this robin does sassing Solanaceae and it is a popping does not hold hold. fact6: This cryptanalyst is not aquiferous. fact7: This robin is not a kind of a Atlantic. fact8: A non-anxiolytic thing is megalithic thing that is aquiferous. fact9: This robin does not oxygenize contrasting. fact10: Something that does not decouple Microstrobos is not anxiolytic but a static. fact11: The fact that that schizanthus is a operand but not aquiferous is incorrect. fact12: Somebody that is a popping is not megalithic. fact13: This robin does not decouple Microstrobos if Antoinette is a Spitzbergen. fact14: This robin is not a wasted. fact15: The Bench does not sassing Solanaceae. fact16: This robin is not aquiferous. ; $hypothesis$ = This robin is megalithic. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

Let's assume that the fact that this profoundness does not occurs is true.

¬{A}

fact1: If this profoundness does not occurs that notthat fulfilling but that edifying totalitarianism occurs is wrong. fact2: That edifying totalitarianism happens. fact3: That both this moralness and that focalness occurs is incorrect if this filiating remuda does not occurs. fact4: That fulfilling does not happens. fact5: If the fact that the fact that this moralness and that focalness happens is right does not hold the fact that this profoundness does not happens hold.

fact1: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) fact2: {AB} fact3: ¬{D} -> ¬({C} & {B}) fact4: ¬{AA} fact5: ¬({C} & {B}) -> ¬{A}

Let's assume that the fact that this profoundness does not occurs is true.

¬{A}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this profoundness does not occurs that notthat fulfilling but that edifying totalitarianism occurs is wrong. fact2: That edifying totalitarianism happens. fact3: That both this moralness and that focalness occurs is incorrect if this filiating remuda does not occurs. fact4: That fulfilling does not happens. fact5: If the fact that the fact that this moralness and that focalness happens is right does not hold the fact that this profoundness does not happens hold. ; $hypothesis$ = Let's assume that the fact that this profoundness does not occurs is true. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that this profoundness does not occurs is true.; fact1 & assump1 -> int1: The fact that notthat fulfilling but that edifying totalitarianism happens is not right.; fact4 & fact2 -> int2: That fulfilling does not occurs but that edifying totalitarianism happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That staggerbush is not a kind of a Prosopis and is a bibless.

(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a})

fact1: That quadrangle does not scourge Tropaeolaceae and is a kind of a vertebrate. fact2: If that that staggerbush is not a Prosopis but this is a kind of a bibless is not correct that quadrangle is a bronchiolitis. fact3: That staggerbush is not a Prosopis. fact4: That the cosmologist is not a Prosopis is true. fact5: That quadrangle is a bronchiolitis if that that staggerbush is a kind of a Prosopis is correct. fact6: The Archer is not a Prosopis but it is a kind of a Newtonian. fact7: That quadrangle is not a bronchiolitis. fact8: The fact that that staggerbush is not a bronchiolitis and is a bibless is not correct. fact9: That that staggerbush is a Prosopis and she is a bibless does not hold. fact10: That that quadrangle is a bibless is not wrong. fact11: If that quadrangle is not a vertebrate then that that staggerbush is both not a Prosopis and a bibless does not hold. fact12: If that that quadrangle is not a bibless but a Prosopis is wrong then that staggerbush is a bronchiolitis.

fact1: (¬{EP}{b} & {A}{b}) fact2: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} fact3: ¬{AA}{a} fact4: ¬{AA}{k} fact5: {AA}{a} -> {B}{b} fact6: (¬{AA}{cp} & {FP}{cp}) fact7: ¬{B}{b} fact8: ¬(¬{B}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact9: ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact10: {AB}{b} fact11: ¬{A}{b} -> ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact12: ¬(¬{AB}{b} & {AA}{b}) -> {B}{a}

Let's assume that the fact that that staggerbush is not a Prosopis but this thing is a bibless does not hold.

¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That quadrangle does not scourge Tropaeolaceae and is a kind of a vertebrate. fact2: If that that staggerbush is not a Prosopis but this is a kind of a bibless is not correct that quadrangle is a bronchiolitis. fact3: That staggerbush is not a Prosopis. fact4: That the cosmologist is not a Prosopis is true. fact5: That quadrangle is a bronchiolitis if that that staggerbush is a kind of a Prosopis is correct. fact6: The Archer is not a Prosopis but it is a kind of a Newtonian. fact7: That quadrangle is not a bronchiolitis. fact8: The fact that that staggerbush is not a bronchiolitis and is a bibless is not correct. fact9: That that staggerbush is a Prosopis and she is a bibless does not hold. fact10: That that quadrangle is a bibless is not wrong. fact11: If that quadrangle is not a vertebrate then that that staggerbush is both not a Prosopis and a bibless does not hold. fact12: If that that quadrangle is not a bibless but a Prosopis is wrong then that staggerbush is a bronchiolitis. ; $hypothesis$ = That staggerbush is not a kind of a Prosopis and is a bibless. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that that staggerbush is not a Prosopis but this thing is a bibless does not hold.; fact2 & assump1 -> int1: That quadrangle is a kind of a bronchiolitis.; int1 & fact7 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That Doctor does not happens.

¬{A}

fact1: That longways does not occurs. fact2: That Doctor does not happens.

fact1: ¬{EH} fact2: ¬{A}

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: That longways does not occurs. fact2: That Doctor does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That Doctor does not happens. ; $proof$ =

fact2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

Everybody is a kind of a gripe.

(x): {A}x

fact1: Every man is a monosemy. fact2: Everything is not non-amalgamative. fact3: Everything dissects amaurosis. fact4: Everybody is a kind of a gripe. fact5: Everything is unfathomable. fact6: Every man luxuriates palilalia.

fact1: (x): {GP}x fact2: (x): {JD}x fact3: (x): {AR}x fact4: (x): {A}x fact5: (x): {FR}x fact6: (x): {FB}x

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: Every man is a monosemy. fact2: Everything is not non-amalgamative. fact3: Everything dissects amaurosis. fact4: Everybody is a kind of a gripe. fact5: Everything is unfathomable. fact6: Every man luxuriates palilalia. ; $hypothesis$ = Everybody is a kind of a gripe. ; $proof$ =

fact4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That this anuran is not a Justinian and it does not compose is wrong.

¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a})

fact1: This anuran does not compose. fact2: If someone is not a Rostock then she/he mirrors connoisseurship and she/he accommodates Gromyko. fact3: The fact that that timepiece mirrors connoisseurship hold. fact4: If something is either not inalterable or procaryotic or both it is not inalterable. fact5: If that timepiece mirrors connoisseurship then this offstage mirrors connoisseurship. fact6: This anuran dulcorates biosystematy if this offstage does not dulcorates biosystematy but the thing is a Hadrian. fact7: If some man dulcorates biosystematy either it is not inalterable or it is procaryotic or both. fact8: the fact that that connoisseurship mirrors timepiece hold. fact9: The fact that this offstage does not dulcorate biosystematy but it is a Hadrian if this offstage is anorectal is correct. fact10: Something is not a Justinian and it does not compose if it accommodates Gromyko. fact11: If that timepiece is a pentatone this offstage is not a Rostock and this is not Lilliputian. fact12: That timepiece does not proscribe MB. fact13: If that someone is both not a pentatone and Lilliputian is false then it is not a Rostock. fact14: If that timepiece is underarm then this offstage is anorectal. fact15: Something mirrors connoisseurship and/or it accommodates Gromyko if it is not a kind of a Rostock. fact16: The fact that if this anuran is not a kind of a Justinian and it does not compose then this offstage does not mirror connoisseurship is right. fact17: The fact that that gazpacho is both not a pentatone and Lilliputian is wrong if this anuran is not inalterable. fact18: Something that does not proscribe MB is underarm or a hedgefund or both. fact19: The fact that this anuran is not a Justinian but it composes is incorrect. fact20: This offstage does not mirror connoisseurship if that this anuran is not a kind of a Justinian but it does compose hold.

fact1: ¬{AB}{a} fact2: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({B}x & {A}x) fact3: {B}{c} fact4: (x): (¬{F}x v {H}x) -> ¬{F}x fact5: {B}{c} -> {B}{b} fact6: (¬{G}{b} & {J}{b}) -> {G}{a} fact7: (x): {G}x -> (¬{F}x v {H}x) fact8: {AE}{ac} fact9: {I}{b} -> (¬{G}{b} & {J}{b}) fact10: (x): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact11: {E}{c} -> (¬{C}{b} & ¬{D}{b}) fact12: ¬{M}{c} fact13: (x): ¬(¬{E}x & {D}x) -> ¬{C}x fact14: {K}{c} -> {I}{b} fact15: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({B}x v {A}x) fact16: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact17: ¬{F}{a} -> ¬(¬{E}{je} & {D}{je}) fact18: (x): ¬{M}x -> ({K}x v {L}x) fact19: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact20: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b}

That gazpacho does mirror connoisseurship.

{B}{je}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This anuran does not compose. fact2: If someone is not a Rostock then she/he mirrors connoisseurship and she/he accommodates Gromyko. fact3: The fact that that timepiece mirrors connoisseurship hold. fact4: If something is either not inalterable or procaryotic or both it is not inalterable. fact5: If that timepiece mirrors connoisseurship then this offstage mirrors connoisseurship. fact6: This anuran dulcorates biosystematy if this offstage does not dulcorates biosystematy but the thing is a Hadrian. fact7: If some man dulcorates biosystematy either it is not inalterable or it is procaryotic or both. fact8: the fact that that connoisseurship mirrors timepiece hold. fact9: The fact that this offstage does not dulcorate biosystematy but it is a Hadrian if this offstage is anorectal is correct. fact10: Something is not a Justinian and it does not compose if it accommodates Gromyko. fact11: If that timepiece is a pentatone this offstage is not a Rostock and this is not Lilliputian. fact12: That timepiece does not proscribe MB. fact13: If that someone is both not a pentatone and Lilliputian is false then it is not a Rostock. fact14: If that timepiece is underarm then this offstage is anorectal. fact15: Something mirrors connoisseurship and/or it accommodates Gromyko if it is not a kind of a Rostock. fact16: The fact that if this anuran is not a kind of a Justinian and it does not compose then this offstage does not mirror connoisseurship is right. fact17: The fact that that gazpacho is both not a pentatone and Lilliputian is wrong if this anuran is not inalterable. fact18: Something that does not proscribe MB is underarm or a hedgefund or both. fact19: The fact that this anuran is not a Justinian but it composes is incorrect. fact20: This offstage does not mirror connoisseurship if that this anuran is not a kind of a Justinian but it does compose hold. ; $hypothesis$ = That this anuran is not a Justinian and it does not compose is wrong. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that this anuran is not a Justinian and it does not compose.; fact16 & assump1 -> int1: This offstage does not mirror connoisseurship.; fact5 & fact3 -> int2: That this offstage does mirror connoisseurship is true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This ascendant is not a lease.

¬{B}{a}

fact1: This ascendant is not Indonesian but he/she is a fearfulness. fact2: If this ascendant is not a kind of a findings then this sampan is not a findings. fact3: The fact that that ossuary is a kind of bathymetrical a speechlessness is wrong if that ossuary is not a Paleolithic. fact4: If Doris is not a overappraisal this ascendant disenchants readership and rediscovers insubstantiality. fact5: This ascendant is not a lease if she is a kind of Indonesian person that is a fearfulness. fact6: If this ascendant is a kind of non-Indonesian thing that is a kind of a fearfulness this ascendant is not a kind of a lease. fact7: Something that disenchants readership is both not a lease and not a findings. fact8: That ossuary is not a kind of a Paleolithic. fact9: Someone is not Indonesian but it is small if it is not a kind of a findings. fact10: If that ossuary is not a kind of a Episcopalian but it is a overappraisal then Doris is not a kind of a overappraisal. fact11: If the fact that somebody is bathymetrical and is a speechlessness is not right it is not a Episcopalian.

fact1: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact2: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{A}{cf} fact3: ¬{I}{c} -> ¬({F}{c} & {H}{c}) fact4: ¬{E}{b} -> ({C}{a} & {D}{a}) fact5: ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact6: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact7: (x): {C}x -> (¬{B}x & ¬{A}x) fact8: ¬{I}{c} fact9: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x & {IL}x) fact10: (¬{G}{c} & {E}{c}) -> ¬{E}{b} fact11: (x): ¬({F}x & {H}x) -> ¬{G}x

This sampan is not Indonesian but the person is small.

(¬{AA}{cf} & {IL}{cf})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This ascendant is not Indonesian but he/she is a fearfulness. fact2: If this ascendant is not a kind of a findings then this sampan is not a findings. fact3: The fact that that ossuary is a kind of bathymetrical a speechlessness is wrong if that ossuary is not a Paleolithic. fact4: If Doris is not a overappraisal this ascendant disenchants readership and rediscovers insubstantiality. fact5: This ascendant is not a lease if she is a kind of Indonesian person that is a fearfulness. fact6: If this ascendant is a kind of non-Indonesian thing that is a kind of a fearfulness this ascendant is not a kind of a lease. fact7: Something that disenchants readership is both not a lease and not a findings. fact8: That ossuary is not a kind of a Paleolithic. fact9: Someone is not Indonesian but it is small if it is not a kind of a findings. fact10: If that ossuary is not a kind of a Episcopalian but it is a overappraisal then Doris is not a kind of a overappraisal. fact11: If the fact that somebody is bathymetrical and is a speechlessness is not right it is not a Episcopalian. ; $hypothesis$ = This ascendant is not a lease. ; $proof$ =

fact6 & fact1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This ratifying Chelifer does not happens.

¬{B}

fact1: Both that brachyurousness and the paging Serra occurs if that allotropicness does not occurs. fact2: The fact that notthat looting but this achievement happens is not right. fact3: This isomericness does not happens if either that looting does not happens or the blastosphericness occurs or both. fact4: If that that annoyance occurs and this concatenation occurs is not true that allotropicness does not happens. fact5: That that bottomness occurs results in that notthis Ramses but the confabulating happens. fact6: That this despairing occurs and this racing does not happens is brought about by this acetylicness. fact7: That this mastopexy occurs and this schematisation does not occurs is false if this agitating emotion occurs. fact8: That looting does not occurs and/or the blastosphericness occurs. fact9: This schematisation leads to that non-cochlearness and/or that that detoxing does not happens. fact10: If this isomericness does not happens the fact that both that annoyance and this concatenation happens is wrong. fact11: That brachyurousness brings about that notthat travel but this acetylicness occurs. fact12: This schematisation happens if that this mastopexy happens but this schematisation does not occurs is false. fact13: If that notthat looting but this achievement occurs does not hold this ratifying Chelifer does not happens. fact14: That bottomness happens if this despairing occurs. fact15: If the fact that the defiling Physeter does not happens but the confabulating happens is wrong then that stopper does not occurs. fact16: That that looting happens and this achievement happens is wrong. fact17: This ratifying Chelifer does not occurs if that looting occurs. fact18: The loading does not occurs. fact19: If this Ramses does not occurs then both this agitating emotion and that massacring defiled occurs.

fact1: ¬{Q} -> ({O} & {P}) fact2: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) fact3: (¬{AA} v {U}) -> ¬{T} fact4: ¬({R} & {S}) -> ¬{Q} fact5: {J} -> (¬{H} & {I}) fact6: {M} -> ({K} & ¬{L}) fact7: {F} -> ¬({E} & ¬{D}) fact8: (¬{AA} v {U}) fact9: {D} -> (¬{A} v ¬{C}) fact10: ¬{T} -> ¬({R} & {S}) fact11: {O} -> (¬{N} & {M}) fact12: ¬({E} & ¬{D}) -> {D} fact13: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} fact14: {K} -> {J} fact15: ¬(¬{IU} & {I}) -> ¬{GF} fact16: ¬({AA} & {AB}) fact17: {AA} -> ¬{B} fact18: ¬{FQ} fact19: ¬{H} -> ({F} & {G})

The fact that this ratifying Chelifer occurs is true.

{B}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Both that brachyurousness and the paging Serra occurs if that allotropicness does not occurs. fact2: The fact that notthat looting but this achievement happens is not right. fact3: This isomericness does not happens if either that looting does not happens or the blastosphericness occurs or both. fact4: If that that annoyance occurs and this concatenation occurs is not true that allotropicness does not happens. fact5: That that bottomness occurs results in that notthis Ramses but the confabulating happens. fact6: That this despairing occurs and this racing does not happens is brought about by this acetylicness. fact7: That this mastopexy occurs and this schematisation does not occurs is false if this agitating emotion occurs. fact8: That looting does not occurs and/or the blastosphericness occurs. fact9: This schematisation leads to that non-cochlearness and/or that that detoxing does not happens. fact10: If this isomericness does not happens the fact that both that annoyance and this concatenation happens is wrong. fact11: That brachyurousness brings about that notthat travel but this acetylicness occurs. fact12: This schematisation happens if that this mastopexy happens but this schematisation does not occurs is false. fact13: If that notthat looting but this achievement occurs does not hold this ratifying Chelifer does not happens. fact14: That bottomness happens if this despairing occurs. fact15: If the fact that the defiling Physeter does not happens but the confabulating happens is wrong then that stopper does not occurs. fact16: That that looting happens and this achievement happens is wrong. fact17: This ratifying Chelifer does not occurs if that looting occurs. fact18: The loading does not occurs. fact19: If this Ramses does not occurs then both this agitating emotion and that massacring defiled occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = This ratifying Chelifer does not happens. ; $proof$ =

fact13 & fact2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That antiviral does not happens.

¬{C}

fact1: That alarming Astroloma does not occurs if that harmonization happens. fact2: That that extolling Augeas does not happens and the spinelessness does not occurs is caused by that this sprites does not happens. fact3: That that antiviral does not occurs is right if this inshoreness occurs and that extolling Augeas happens. fact4: This sprites does not happens if this advancement does not happens and/or this sprites does not happens. fact5: That both that notarising DBA and this fMRI occurs is wrong if this adamantineness does not occurs. fact6: If that the non-tonalness and that unintegratedness happens does not hold that that unintegratedness does not occurs is true. fact7: That misdemeanour does not occurs if that the meretriciousness occurs or the earthenness occurs or both does not hold. fact8: That that alarming Astroloma does not occurs yields that this unpasteurisedness occurs and that biblicalness happens. fact9: That the unfreeness does not occurs is brought about by that both the overeating and that catheterisation happens. fact10: If this accordantness does not occurs and that hackwork does not occurs then this adamantineness does not occurs. fact11: That antiviral and this inshoreness occurs if the fact that that extolling Augeas does not occurs is right. fact12: The fact that the meretriciousness and/or the earthenness occurs is wrong if that unintegratedness does not occurs. fact13: This fMRI does not occurs if the fact that the fact that that notarising DBA occurs and this fMRI occurs is false is true. fact14: That extolling Augeas happens. fact15: That this advancement does not occurs is caused by that this donating keratoscleritis occurs. fact16: The variety and this donating keratoscleritis happens if that misdemeanour does not happens. fact17: If that baring occurs that harmonization occurs. fact18: The fact that both the non-tonalness and that unintegratedness occurs does not hold if this fMRI does not happens. fact19: If both that happening might and the overeating happens this sousing zeal does not occurs. fact20: That that longing Arabidopsis does not happens leads to that that baring and that carpetbagness occurs. fact21: This inshoreness occurs. fact22: If this unpasteurisedness occurs then this accordantness does not occurs and that hackwork does not occurs.

fact1: {AA} -> ¬{U} fact2: ¬{E} -> (¬{B} & ¬{D}) fact3: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} fact4: (¬{F} v ¬{E}) -> ¬{E} fact5: ¬{P} -> ¬({O} & {M}) fact6: ¬(¬{N} & {L}) -> ¬{L} fact7: ¬({J} v {K}) -> ¬{I} fact8: ¬{U} -> ({S} & {T}) fact9: ({BJ} & {BN}) -> ¬{JJ} fact10: (¬{Q} & ¬{R}) -> ¬{P} fact11: ¬{B} -> ({C} & {A}) fact12: ¬{L} -> ¬({J} v {K}) fact13: ¬({O} & {M}) -> ¬{M} fact14: {B} fact15: {G} -> ¬{F} fact16: ¬{I} -> ({H} & {G}) fact17: {AB} -> {AA} fact18: ¬{M} -> ¬(¬{N} & {L}) fact19: ({AN} & {BJ}) -> ¬{GC} fact20: ¬{AD} -> ({AB} & {AC}) fact21: {A} fact22: {S} -> (¬{Q} & ¬{R})

That antiviral happens.

{C}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That alarming Astroloma does not occurs if that harmonization happens. fact2: That that extolling Augeas does not happens and the spinelessness does not occurs is caused by that this sprites does not happens. fact3: That that antiviral does not occurs is right if this inshoreness occurs and that extolling Augeas happens. fact4: This sprites does not happens if this advancement does not happens and/or this sprites does not happens. fact5: That both that notarising DBA and this fMRI occurs is wrong if this adamantineness does not occurs. fact6: If that the non-tonalness and that unintegratedness happens does not hold that that unintegratedness does not occurs is true. fact7: That misdemeanour does not occurs if that the meretriciousness occurs or the earthenness occurs or both does not hold. fact8: That that alarming Astroloma does not occurs yields that this unpasteurisedness occurs and that biblicalness happens. fact9: That the unfreeness does not occurs is brought about by that both the overeating and that catheterisation happens. fact10: If this accordantness does not occurs and that hackwork does not occurs then this adamantineness does not occurs. fact11: That antiviral and this inshoreness occurs if the fact that that extolling Augeas does not occurs is right. fact12: The fact that the meretriciousness and/or the earthenness occurs is wrong if that unintegratedness does not occurs. fact13: This fMRI does not occurs if the fact that the fact that that notarising DBA occurs and this fMRI occurs is false is true. fact14: That extolling Augeas happens. fact15: That this advancement does not occurs is caused by that this donating keratoscleritis occurs. fact16: The variety and this donating keratoscleritis happens if that misdemeanour does not happens. fact17: If that baring occurs that harmonization occurs. fact18: The fact that both the non-tonalness and that unintegratedness occurs does not hold if this fMRI does not happens. fact19: If both that happening might and the overeating happens this sousing zeal does not occurs. fact20: That that longing Arabidopsis does not happens leads to that that baring and that carpetbagness occurs. fact21: This inshoreness occurs. fact22: If this unpasteurisedness occurs then this accordantness does not occurs and that hackwork does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That antiviral does not happens. ; $proof$ =

fact21 & fact14 -> int1: This inshoreness happens and that extolling Augeas occurs.; int1 & fact3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

The fact that this hurricane happens is true.

{AA}

fact1: That that Salvadoreanness occurs is true. fact2: If this cesarean does not happens then that Salvadoreanness and this hurricane happens. fact3: If that Salvadoreanness occurs then that libation occurs. fact4: That this hurricane does not happens but that libation occurs is caused by that Salvadoreanness. fact5: Notthe fireman but that convertibleness occurs. fact6: The tergiversation does not happens.

fact1: {A} fact2: ¬{B} -> ({A} & {AA}) fact3: {A} -> {AB} fact4: {A} -> (¬{AA} & {AB}) fact5: (¬{O} & {IO}) fact6: ¬{HH}

The fact that this hurricane happens is true.

{AA}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That that Salvadoreanness occurs is true. fact2: If this cesarean does not happens then that Salvadoreanness and this hurricane happens. fact3: If that Salvadoreanness occurs then that libation occurs. fact4: That this hurricane does not happens but that libation occurs is caused by that Salvadoreanness. fact5: Notthe fireman but that convertibleness occurs. fact6: The tergiversation does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that this hurricane happens is true. ; $proof$ =

fact4 & fact1 -> int1: Notthis hurricane but that libation occurs.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That gravel is not crannied.

{B}{aa}

fact1: That trajectory is not a Amen. fact2: If the fact that that trajectory is not a concerned but bulbar is incorrect then that figure is actinomorphic. fact3: The fact that that trajectory is not a concerned but bulbar does not hold if that trajectory is not a Amen. fact4: There is nothing that is not a kind of a Heteromeles and is not a kind of a trot. fact5: If some person is not a scuffle it is a smugness and it is a Konoe. fact6: Someone is a scuffle and not a Green if that person does not worry stephead. fact7: That the fact that that gravel is a Heteromeles and not a trot is right is false. fact8: If some man is spermous then the fact that this person does not thread Momotidae and this person does not consecrate is incorrect. fact9: If something is a kind of a Heteromeles it is uncrannied. fact10: That if that somebody is not a Heteromeles and the one is not a trot is incorrect then the one is uncrannied hold. fact11: The fact that some man is not uncrannied and does coquette Chickamauga is wrong if the one is a smugness. fact12: There exists nothing such that it is not a brushed and is not a cachexy. fact13: That gravel is not uncrannied if that that recording does not coquette Chickamauga and is spermous is wrong. fact14: If some person rejects lysinemia he does not worry stephead. fact15: The cog is spermous if the fact that that recording is not uncrannied but she coquettes Chickamauga is false. fact16: That gravel is uncrannied if it is a Heteromeles. fact17: If some man is actinomorphic it is not non-transcendental. fact18: If the fact that that gravel is not a kind of a Heteroscelus and it does not gormandise does not hold then that gravel is uncrannied. fact19: If there is something such that that thing is transcendental then Gina sees ragtime and rejects lysinemia. fact20: The fact that that recording is not a scuffle hold if Gina is a scuffle and not a Green. fact21: There exists nothing that is a Heteromeles that is not a trot.

fact1: ¬{O}{d} fact2: ¬(¬{M}{d} & {N}{d}) -> {L}{c} fact3: ¬{O}{d} -> ¬(¬{M}{d} & {N}{d}) fact4: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact5: (x): ¬{F}x -> ({D}x & {E}x) fact6: (x): ¬{G}x -> ({F}x & ¬{H}x) fact7: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) fact8: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{HU}x & ¬{BK}x) fact9: (x): {AA}x -> {B}x fact10: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x fact11: (x): {D}x -> ¬(¬{B}x & {C}x) fact12: (x): ¬(¬{ES}x & ¬{HJ}x) fact13: ¬(¬{C}{a} & {A}{a}) -> ¬{B}{aa} fact14: (x): {I}x -> ¬{G}x fact15: ¬(¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}) -> {A}{gi} fact16: {AA}{aa} -> {B}{aa} fact17: (x): {L}x -> {K}x fact18: ¬(¬{HP}{aa} & ¬{FH}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} fact19: (x): {K}x -> ({J}{b} & {I}{b}) fact20: ({F}{b} & ¬{H}{b}) -> ¬{F}{a} fact21: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x)

That gravel is not uncrannied.

¬{B}{aa}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That trajectory is not a Amen. fact2: If the fact that that trajectory is not a concerned but bulbar is incorrect then that figure is actinomorphic. fact3: The fact that that trajectory is not a concerned but bulbar does not hold if that trajectory is not a Amen. fact4: There is nothing that is not a kind of a Heteromeles and is not a kind of a trot. fact5: If some person is not a scuffle it is a smugness and it is a Konoe. fact6: Someone is a scuffle and not a Green if that person does not worry stephead. fact7: That the fact that that gravel is a Heteromeles and not a trot is right is false. fact8: If some man is spermous then the fact that this person does not thread Momotidae and this person does not consecrate is incorrect. fact9: If something is a kind of a Heteromeles it is uncrannied. fact10: That if that somebody is not a Heteromeles and the one is not a trot is incorrect then the one is uncrannied hold. fact11: The fact that some man is not uncrannied and does coquette Chickamauga is wrong if the one is a smugness. fact12: There exists nothing such that it is not a brushed and is not a cachexy. fact13: That gravel is not uncrannied if that that recording does not coquette Chickamauga and is spermous is wrong. fact14: If some person rejects lysinemia he does not worry stephead. fact15: The cog is spermous if the fact that that recording is not uncrannied but she coquettes Chickamauga is false. fact16: That gravel is uncrannied if it is a Heteromeles. fact17: If some man is actinomorphic it is not non-transcendental. fact18: If the fact that that gravel is not a kind of a Heteroscelus and it does not gormandise does not hold then that gravel is uncrannied. fact19: If there is something such that that thing is transcendental then Gina sees ragtime and rejects lysinemia. fact20: The fact that that recording is not a scuffle hold if Gina is a scuffle and not a Green. fact21: There exists nothing that is a Heteromeles that is not a trot. ; $hypothesis$ = That gravel is not crannied. ; $proof$ =

fact10 -> int1: If that that gravel is not a Heteromeles and is not a kind of a trot is wrong then that gravel is uncrannied.; fact4 -> int2: That that gravel is not a Heteromeles and is not a kind of a trot is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That salt is not asterismal.

¬{C}{a}

fact1: If something that is not a serviceableness is not a persuasiveness that pinky is a Rhizopogonaceae. fact2: That wheatear is a persuasiveness. fact3: That resolvent is a persuasiveness. fact4: If some person that is asterismal is not a Harrisia then it is a acrocephaly. fact5: The fact that that salt robs but it is not a persuasiveness does not hold. fact6: Something that is not a serviceableness is a kind of asterismal thing that is a persuasiveness. fact7: If that wheatear is both not a serviceableness and not a Harrisia then that salt is not a serviceableness. fact8: That salt is both not a Rhizopogonaceae and a shambles. fact9: If the fact that that wheatear robs and is a serviceableness hold then that salt is not a kind of a serviceableness. fact10: That guan is not a serviceableness if that crammer is a Harrisia but that one is not a snit. fact11: That salt is a kind of a shambles. fact12: Somebody is not a alexic but it is a panchayet. fact13: That salt is a serviceableness if that is not a Rhizopogonaceae and is a shambles. fact14: If something is a alexic then that does rob and that is not a snit. fact15: The fact that that salt robs and it is a persuasiveness does not hold. fact16: If that guan does rob but that thing is not a kind of a snit then that that wheatear is not a serviceableness is correct. fact17: That salt is a kind of a persuasiveness if the fact that that salt robs but he/she is not a persuasiveness is incorrect. fact18: If some man is a serviceableness and a persuasiveness that one is not asterismal. fact19: That if this cowhouse is not a alexic then that crammer is a kind of a Harrisia but it is not a snit is right.

fact1: (x): (¬{B}x & ¬{A}x) -> {AA}{gj} fact2: {A}{b} fact3: {A}{dc} fact4: (x): ({C}x & ¬{D}x) -> {BR}x fact5: ¬({E}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) fact6: (x): ¬{B}x -> ({C}x & {A}x) fact7: (¬{B}{b} & ¬{D}{b}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact8: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact9: ({E}{b} & {B}{b}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact10: ({D}{d} & ¬{F}{d}) -> ¬{B}{c} fact11: {AB}{a} fact12: (Ex): (¬{G}x & {I}x) fact13: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} fact14: (x): {G}x -> ({E}x & ¬{F}x) fact15: ¬({E}{a} & {A}{a}) fact16: ({E}{c} & ¬{F}{c}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact17: ¬({E}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) -> {A}{a} fact18: (x): ({B}x & {A}x) -> ¬{C}x fact19: ¬{G}{e} -> ({D}{d} & ¬{F}{d})

That pinky is a Rhizopogonaceae and it is a acrocephaly.

({AA}{gj} & {BR}{gj})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If something that is not a serviceableness is not a persuasiveness that pinky is a Rhizopogonaceae. fact2: That wheatear is a persuasiveness. fact3: That resolvent is a persuasiveness. fact4: If some person that is asterismal is not a Harrisia then it is a acrocephaly. fact5: The fact that that salt robs but it is not a persuasiveness does not hold. fact6: Something that is not a serviceableness is a kind of asterismal thing that is a persuasiveness. fact7: If that wheatear is both not a serviceableness and not a Harrisia then that salt is not a serviceableness. fact8: That salt is both not a Rhizopogonaceae and a shambles. fact9: If the fact that that wheatear robs and is a serviceableness hold then that salt is not a kind of a serviceableness. fact10: That guan is not a serviceableness if that crammer is a Harrisia but that one is not a snit. fact11: That salt is a kind of a shambles. fact12: Somebody is not a alexic but it is a panchayet. fact13: That salt is a serviceableness if that is not a Rhizopogonaceae and is a shambles. fact14: If something is a alexic then that does rob and that is not a snit. fact15: The fact that that salt robs and it is a persuasiveness does not hold. fact16: If that guan does rob but that thing is not a kind of a snit then that that wheatear is not a serviceableness is correct. fact17: That salt is a kind of a persuasiveness if the fact that that salt robs but he/she is not a persuasiveness is incorrect. fact18: If some man is a serviceableness and a persuasiveness that one is not asterismal. fact19: That if this cowhouse is not a alexic then that crammer is a kind of a Harrisia but it is not a snit is right. ; $hypothesis$ = That salt is not asterismal. ; $proof$ =

fact13 & fact8 -> int1: That salt is a serviceableness.; fact5 & fact17 -> int2: That salt is a persuasiveness.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That salt is a serviceableness that is a kind of a persuasiveness.; fact18 -> int4: That salt is not asterismal if this thing is a serviceableness and a persuasiveness.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That this n does not smolder data hold.

¬{A}{a}

fact1: If the fact that this pneumococcus does not shilling but it smolders data is incorrect this n does smolders data. fact2: That this n blinks and is not a Hedera is false. fact3: Someone is a Hedera but the person is not a Thespesia if the person is an employable.

fact1: ¬(¬{B}{b} & {A}{b}) -> {A}{a} fact2: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact3: (x): {P}x -> ({AB}x & ¬{HF}x)

That ailanthus is a Hedera but it is not a Thespesia if that ailanthus is an employable.

{P}{ch} -> ({AB}{ch} & ¬{HF}{ch})

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: If the fact that this pneumococcus does not shilling but it smolders data is incorrect this n does smolders data. fact2: That this n blinks and is not a Hedera is false. fact3: Someone is a Hedera but the person is not a Thespesia if the person is an employable. ; $hypothesis$ = That this n does not smolder data hold. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That this forgery does not proposition anorthography hold.

¬{B}{b}

fact1: That bettong is a lacking. fact2: If that bettong verbalizes brownness then this forgery does not proposition anorthography. fact3: The fact that that bettong does verbalize brownness but he/she does not proposition anorthography does not hold if the fact that he/she is a lacking hold. fact4: That the fact that that bettong is a kind of a Tayassu that does not verbalize brownness is wrong if that bettong is a kind of a lacking hold. fact5: That the microgliacyte narrates Diapensiaceae and this thing contrasts EMG is wrong.

fact1: {A}{a} fact2: {AB}{a} -> ¬{B}{b} fact3: {A}{a} -> ¬({AB}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) fact4: {A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact5: ¬({FG}{n} & {E}{n})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That bettong is a lacking. fact2: If that bettong verbalizes brownness then this forgery does not proposition anorthography. fact3: The fact that that bettong does verbalize brownness but he/she does not proposition anorthography does not hold if the fact that he/she is a lacking hold. fact4: That the fact that that bettong is a kind of a Tayassu that does not verbalize brownness is wrong if that bettong is a kind of a lacking hold. fact5: That the microgliacyte narrates Diapensiaceae and this thing contrasts EMG is wrong. ; $hypothesis$ = That this forgery does not proposition anorthography hold. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This mistaking consensus does not occurs and this socializing Dubya does not happens.

(¬{AA} & ¬{AB})

fact1: If that this mistaking consensus occurs and that Somaliness happens is not true this mistaking consensus does not occurs. fact2: This electing equality happens. fact3: That this sprinkling does not occurs and/or this synchronousness prevents that inexpensiveness. fact4: If this scouting Adiantum occurs the fact that that this mistaking consensus does not occurs and this socializing Dubya does not occurs does not hold is right. fact5: That the freckle happens is prevented by that both that neuter and this electing equality occurs. fact6: Both that neuter and the tearing midafternoon occurs. fact7: If that Somaliness occurs then notthis bond but that browsing happens. fact8: This sprinkling does not happens or this synchronousness happens or both if the fact that that meaning snoopy happens hold. fact9: That this bond does not occurs leads to that that tripos and this scouting Adiantum occurs. fact10: If that this socializing Dubya and this scouting Adiantum occurs is wrong then this socializing Dubya does not happens. fact11: If that that inexpensiveness does not happens is correct this bond does not occurs and that browsing does not happens. fact12: That this mistaking consensus occurs and that Somaliness happens does not hold if that confiding Bangalore does not occurs. fact13: If this bond does not occurs then the fact that this socializing Dubya occurs and this scouting Adiantum happens does not hold. fact14: That that splitsville does not happens results in that the whelping frangibleness happens and that meaning snoopy happens. fact15: If the fact that that Somaliness does not occurs and this synchronousness does not occurs is incorrect then that Somaliness occurs. fact16: If the freckle does not happens that confiding Bangalore does not happens and the commitment happens.

fact1: ¬({AA} & {D}) -> ¬{AA} fact2: {M} fact3: (¬{G} v {F}) -> ¬{E} fact4: {A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) fact5: ({N} & {M}) -> ¬{L} fact6: ({N} & {Q}) fact7: {D} -> (¬{B} & {C}) fact8: {H} -> (¬{G} v {F}) fact9: ¬{B} -> ({GA} & {A}) fact10: ¬({AB} & {A}) -> ¬{AB} fact11: ¬{E} -> (¬{B} & ¬{C}) fact12: ¬{J} -> ¬({AA} & {D}) fact13: ¬{B} -> ¬({AB} & {A}) fact14: ¬{O} -> ({I} & {H}) fact15: ¬(¬{D} & ¬{F}) -> {D} fact16: ¬{L} -> (¬{J} & {K})

This mistaking consensus does not occurs and this socializing Dubya does not happens.

(¬{AA} & ¬{AB})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that this mistaking consensus occurs and that Somaliness happens is not true this mistaking consensus does not occurs. fact2: This electing equality happens. fact3: That this sprinkling does not occurs and/or this synchronousness prevents that inexpensiveness. fact4: If this scouting Adiantum occurs the fact that that this mistaking consensus does not occurs and this socializing Dubya does not occurs does not hold is right. fact5: That the freckle happens is prevented by that both that neuter and this electing equality occurs. fact6: Both that neuter and the tearing midafternoon occurs. fact7: If that Somaliness occurs then notthis bond but that browsing happens. fact8: This sprinkling does not happens or this synchronousness happens or both if the fact that that meaning snoopy happens hold. fact9: That this bond does not occurs leads to that that tripos and this scouting Adiantum occurs. fact10: If that this socializing Dubya and this scouting Adiantum occurs is wrong then this socializing Dubya does not happens. fact11: If that that inexpensiveness does not happens is correct this bond does not occurs and that browsing does not happens. fact12: That this mistaking consensus occurs and that Somaliness happens does not hold if that confiding Bangalore does not occurs. fact13: If this bond does not occurs then the fact that this socializing Dubya occurs and this scouting Adiantum happens does not hold. fact14: That that splitsville does not happens results in that the whelping frangibleness happens and that meaning snoopy happens. fact15: If the fact that that Somaliness does not occurs and this synchronousness does not occurs is incorrect then that Somaliness occurs. fact16: If the freckle does not happens that confiding Bangalore does not happens and the commitment happens. ; $hypothesis$ = This mistaking consensus does not occurs and this socializing Dubya does not happens. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

The tailing Asin happens.

{B}

fact1: This refractiveness does not occurs and this counterbombardment happens if that bragging does not happens. fact2: That bragging does not happens. fact3: This refractiveness is prevented by that that bragging does not happens. fact4: This refractiveness does not happens. fact5: That notthis refractiveness but this counterbombardment happens prevents that the tailing Asin does not occurs. fact6: That this refractiveness occurs and this counterbombardment happens prevents that the tailing Asin does not occurs.

fact1: ¬{A} -> (¬{AA} & {AB}) fact2: ¬{A} fact3: ¬{A} -> ¬{AA} fact4: ¬{AA} fact5: (¬{AA} & {AB}) -> {B} fact6: ({AA} & {AB}) -> {B}

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: This refractiveness does not occurs and this counterbombardment happens if that bragging does not happens. fact2: That bragging does not happens. fact3: This refractiveness is prevented by that that bragging does not happens. fact4: This refractiveness does not happens. fact5: That notthis refractiveness but this counterbombardment happens prevents that the tailing Asin does not occurs. fact6: That this refractiveness occurs and this counterbombardment happens prevents that the tailing Asin does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = The tailing Asin happens. ; $proof$ =

fact1 & fact2 -> int1: This refractiveness does not happens and this counterbombardment occurs.; int1 & fact5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That this neve is not a malady and is not a Markova is incorrect.

¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a})

fact1: If someone does vaporize it is not a kind of a Markova and is not pteridological. fact2: This neve is a spirits if it towels loaded and it does not contain reject. fact3: Some man is not a kind of a frail and it does not degrade acorea if it is a spirits. fact4: This neve towels loaded and does not contain reject. fact5: If someone does not degrade acorea then she converts Labrouste and vaporizes. fact6: This neve is not a malady and is not a Markova.

fact1: (x): {A}x -> (¬{AB}x & ¬{IT}x) fact2: ({G}{a} & ¬{F}{a}) -> {D}{a} fact3: (x): {D}x -> (¬{E}x & ¬{C}x) fact4: ({G}{a} & ¬{F}{a}) fact5: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({B}x & {A}x) fact6: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a})

This disparager is not a Markova and is not pteridological.

(¬{AB}{aq} & ¬{IT}{aq})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If someone does vaporize it is not a kind of a Markova and is not pteridological. fact2: This neve is a spirits if it towels loaded and it does not contain reject. fact3: Some man is not a kind of a frail and it does not degrade acorea if it is a spirits. fact4: This neve towels loaded and does not contain reject. fact5: If someone does not degrade acorea then she converts Labrouste and vaporizes. fact6: This neve is not a malady and is not a Markova. ; $hypothesis$ = That this neve is not a malady and is not a Markova is incorrect. ; $proof$ =

fact6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This formalizing radicalism does not occurs and that simmering happens.

(¬{B} & {A})

fact1: That simmering happens if this supervision occurs. fact2: This formalizing radicalism does not occurs if the fact that this plaining and this rimming Anubis occurs is incorrect. fact3: This supervision occurs. fact4: That both this plaining and this rimming Anubis occurs is incorrect.

fact1: {C} -> {A} fact2: ¬({AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} fact3: {C} fact4: ¬({AA} & {AB})

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: That simmering happens if this supervision occurs. fact2: This formalizing radicalism does not occurs if the fact that this plaining and this rimming Anubis occurs is incorrect. fact3: This supervision occurs. fact4: That both this plaining and this rimming Anubis occurs is incorrect. ; $hypothesis$ = This formalizing radicalism does not occurs and that simmering happens. ; $proof$ =

fact2 & fact4 -> int1: This formalizing radicalism does not occurs.; fact1 & fact3 -> int2: That simmering happens.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This Inquisitor is not providential.

¬{A}{a}

fact1: That consuetudinary countermines if Daniella countermines. fact2: The fact that this Inquisitor is not a dimmer and is not a rigging if this Inquisitor is a Kore is right. fact3: If this Inquisitor does not plunder the fact that that wiggler is both a dimmer and providential hold. fact4: Something spumes Canterbury and it is thyroidal if it is not a kind of a holism. fact5: If something countermines it is a Kore. fact6: If this airgun is cervical then this crosstie is non-Swiss. fact7: That that consuetudinary is a dimmer but this one is not providential does not hold. fact8: Some person is providential person that plunders if the fact that it is not a dimmer hold. fact9: That this Inquisitor is providential but it is not a dimmer is incorrect. fact10: If the fact that that consuetudinary countermines hold the fact that this Inquisitor is not a rigging and is a Kore is wrong. fact11: The fact that that consuetudinary plunders but it is not a dimmer is false. fact12: Daniella countermines if this crosstie is not Swiss. fact13: If this Inquisitor is providential then that consuetudinary plunders. fact14: If something that is cervical is not Swiss it does countermine. fact15: If the fact that something is not a rigging but it is a Kore is incorrect then it does not plunder. fact16: This Inquisitor is a dimmer. fact17: This airgun is not a holism. fact18: If this airgun spumes Canterbury then this airgun is not a Heimdallr. fact19: If someone is not a Heimdallr then this one is not non-cervical and implicates Neckar. fact20: This gosling is providential. fact21: If the fact that the fact that that consuetudinary plunders but it is not a kind of a dimmer is true is not true that consuetudinary does not plunders.

fact1: {F}{c} -> {F}{b} fact2: {E}{a} -> (¬{C}{a} & ¬{D}{a}) fact3: ¬{B}{a} -> ({C}{ch} & {A}{ch}) fact4: (x): ¬{M}x -> ({K}x & {L}x) fact5: (x): {F}x -> {E}x fact6: {H}{e} -> ¬{G}{d} fact7: ¬({C}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) fact8: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x & {B}x) fact9: ¬({A}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) fact10: {F}{b} -> ¬(¬{D}{a} & {E}{a}) fact11: ¬({B}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) fact12: ¬{G}{d} -> {F}{c} fact13: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} fact14: (x): ({H}x & ¬{G}x) -> {F}x fact15: (x): ¬(¬{D}x & {E}x) -> ¬{B}x fact16: {C}{a} fact17: ¬{M}{e} fact18: {K}{e} -> ¬{J}{e} fact19: (x): ¬{J}x -> ({H}x & {I}x) fact20: {A}{bt} fact21: ¬({B}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) -> ¬{B}{b}

That wiggler is a dimmer.

{C}{ch}

PROVED

PROVED

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: That consuetudinary countermines if Daniella countermines. fact2: The fact that this Inquisitor is not a dimmer and is not a rigging if this Inquisitor is a Kore is right. fact3: If this Inquisitor does not plunder the fact that that wiggler is both a dimmer and providential hold. fact4: Something spumes Canterbury and it is thyroidal if it is not a kind of a holism. fact5: If something countermines it is a Kore. fact6: If this airgun is cervical then this crosstie is non-Swiss. fact7: That that consuetudinary is a dimmer but this one is not providential does not hold. fact8: Some person is providential person that plunders if the fact that it is not a dimmer hold. fact9: That this Inquisitor is providential but it is not a dimmer is incorrect. fact10: If the fact that that consuetudinary countermines hold the fact that this Inquisitor is not a rigging and is a Kore is wrong. fact11: The fact that that consuetudinary plunders but it is not a dimmer is false. fact12: Daniella countermines if this crosstie is not Swiss. fact13: If this Inquisitor is providential then that consuetudinary plunders. fact14: If something that is cervical is not Swiss it does countermine. fact15: If the fact that something is not a rigging but it is a Kore is incorrect then it does not plunder. fact16: This Inquisitor is a dimmer. fact17: This airgun is not a holism. fact18: If this airgun spumes Canterbury then this airgun is not a Heimdallr. fact19: If someone is not a Heimdallr then this one is not non-cervical and implicates Neckar. fact20: This gosling is providential. fact21: If the fact that the fact that that consuetudinary plunders but it is not a kind of a dimmer is true is not true that consuetudinary does not plunders. ; $hypothesis$ = This Inquisitor is not providential. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that this Inquisitor is providential.; fact13 & assump1 -> int1: That consuetudinary plunders.; fact11 & fact21 -> int2: That consuetudinary does not plunder.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This ministerialness does not happens.

¬{C}

fact1: Notthis jubilation but that Eucharist happens if the ones occurs. fact2: That arousal does not happens if the fact that this astounding does not occurs or the Vienneseness happens or both is wrong. fact3: This blastemicness occurs if this ticktacktoo happens. fact4: This chromatographicalness occurs. fact5: That that capitalist does not happens and/or this chromatographicalness happens is false if this blastemicness occurs. fact6: If that arousal does not happens then that hypodermicness does not happens and this blighting hyphen does not occurs. fact7: This easiness does not occurs and the carbonating talking does not happens if this jubilation does not occurs. fact8: If that that capitalist does not happens and/or this chromatographicalness happens is wrong then this ministerialness does not happens. fact9: The fact that both that uninterruptedness and this ticktacktoo happens hold if this easiness does not occurs. fact10: If that capitalist occurs this ministerialness occurs. fact11: The fact that either this astounding does not happens or the Vienneseness happens or both does not hold if this interbreeding does not happens. fact12: If this chromatographicalness does not occurs then that both this trouncing Hastings and that capitalist happens hold. fact13: The dysphemisticness occurs. fact14: That the ones and this tomentoseness happens is brought about by this non-hypodermicness.

fact1: {K} -> (¬{I} & {J}) fact2: ¬(¬{Q} v {P}) -> ¬{O} fact3: {E} -> {D} fact4: {B} fact5: {D} -> ¬(¬{A} v {B}) fact6: ¬{O} -> (¬{M} & ¬{N}) fact7: ¬{I} -> (¬{G} & ¬{H}) fact8: ¬(¬{A} v {B}) -> ¬{C} fact9: ¬{G} -> ({F} & {E}) fact10: {A} -> {C} fact11: ¬{R} -> ¬(¬{Q} v {P}) fact12: ¬{B} -> ({EQ} & {A}) fact13: {FP} fact14: ¬{M} -> ({K} & {L})

This ministerialness does not happens.

¬{C}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Notthis jubilation but that Eucharist happens if the ones occurs. fact2: That arousal does not happens if the fact that this astounding does not occurs or the Vienneseness happens or both is wrong. fact3: This blastemicness occurs if this ticktacktoo happens. fact4: This chromatographicalness occurs. fact5: That that capitalist does not happens and/or this chromatographicalness happens is false if this blastemicness occurs. fact6: If that arousal does not happens then that hypodermicness does not happens and this blighting hyphen does not occurs. fact7: This easiness does not occurs and the carbonating talking does not happens if this jubilation does not occurs. fact8: If that that capitalist does not happens and/or this chromatographicalness happens is wrong then this ministerialness does not happens. fact9: The fact that both that uninterruptedness and this ticktacktoo happens hold if this easiness does not occurs. fact10: If that capitalist occurs this ministerialness occurs. fact11: The fact that either this astounding does not happens or the Vienneseness happens or both does not hold if this interbreeding does not happens. fact12: If this chromatographicalness does not occurs then that both this trouncing Hastings and that capitalist happens hold. fact13: The dysphemisticness occurs. fact14: That the ones and this tomentoseness happens is brought about by this non-hypodermicness. ; $hypothesis$ = This ministerialness does not happens. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That locale is not unimpressionable.

¬{B}{a}

fact1: If that Tinea rams glistening that locale rams glistening. fact2: The loadstone is not a kind of a Ardea. fact3: The Ascomycetes is not a kind of a Woodbury. fact4: If something is vulvar that this thing is not unimpressionable and/or is not a Woodbury is not false. fact5: That locale offings Toronto if the fact that that locale is not a Kokka is true. fact6: That Tinea is vulvar if that omission is a Perodicticus. fact7: Someone rams glistening if the fact that it is not a kind of a Perodicticus is not wrong. fact8: If that omission rams glistening then that Tinea is vulvar. fact9: The fact that if that this boilersuit is not esoteric and it does not pile granuloma is incorrect then that autogiro pile granuloma hold. fact10: That locale is palatial. fact11: That this gallamine is not vulvar and is unimpressionable does not hold if that locale does ram glistening. fact12: Something does not rinse Arecaceae if it is not a Dacrydium and is dysplastic. fact13: Something is a kind of a pale if this thing piles granuloma. fact14: That somebody is not esoteric and does not pile granuloma does not hold if it is not non-schismatical. fact15: The fact that that locale is not unimpressionable is true if that Tinea is not unimpressionable. fact16: If something does not rinse Arecaceae then the thing either rams glistening or is a Perodicticus or both. fact17: The fact that that locale is unimpressionable is correct if that locale is not a Woodbury. fact18: The fact that this boilersuit is schismatical and not a schmeer hold if the loadstone is not a Ardea. fact19: That omission does not rinse Arecaceae if that autogiro does not rinse Arecaceae. fact20: Something that is a pale is not a Dacrydium and is dysplastic.

fact1: {D}{b} -> {D}{a} fact2: ¬{N}{f} fact3: ¬{A}{de} fact4: (x): {C}x -> (¬{B}x v ¬{A}x) fact5: ¬{EC}{a} -> {GG}{a} fact6: {E}{c} -> {C}{b} fact7: (x): ¬{E}x -> {D}x fact8: {D}{c} -> {C}{b} fact9: ¬(¬{L}{e} & ¬{J}{e}) -> {J}{d} fact10: {GU}{a} fact11: {D}{a} -> ¬(¬{C}{jf} & {B}{jf}) fact12: (x): (¬{G}x & {H}x) -> ¬{F}x fact13: (x): {J}x -> {I}x fact14: (x): {K}x -> ¬(¬{L}x & ¬{J}x) fact15: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬{B}{a} fact16: (x): ¬{F}x -> ({D}x v {E}x) fact17: ¬{A}{a} -> {B}{a} fact18: ¬{N}{f} -> ({K}{e} & ¬{M}{e}) fact19: ¬{F}{d} -> ¬{F}{c} fact20: (x): {I}x -> (¬{G}x & {H}x)

That locale is not unimpressionable.

¬{B}{a}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that Tinea rams glistening that locale rams glistening. fact2: The loadstone is not a kind of a Ardea. fact3: The Ascomycetes is not a kind of a Woodbury. fact4: If something is vulvar that this thing is not unimpressionable and/or is not a Woodbury is not false. fact5: That locale offings Toronto if the fact that that locale is not a Kokka is true. fact6: That Tinea is vulvar if that omission is a Perodicticus. fact7: Someone rams glistening if the fact that it is not a kind of a Perodicticus is not wrong. fact8: If that omission rams glistening then that Tinea is vulvar. fact9: The fact that if that this boilersuit is not esoteric and it does not pile granuloma is incorrect then that autogiro pile granuloma hold. fact10: That locale is palatial. fact11: That this gallamine is not vulvar and is unimpressionable does not hold if that locale does ram glistening. fact12: Something does not rinse Arecaceae if it is not a Dacrydium and is dysplastic. fact13: Something is a kind of a pale if this thing piles granuloma. fact14: That somebody is not esoteric and does not pile granuloma does not hold if it is not non-schismatical. fact15: The fact that that locale is not unimpressionable is true if that Tinea is not unimpressionable. fact16: If something does not rinse Arecaceae then the thing either rams glistening or is a Perodicticus or both. fact17: The fact that that locale is unimpressionable is correct if that locale is not a Woodbury. fact18: The fact that this boilersuit is schismatical and not a schmeer hold if the loadstone is not a Ardea. fact19: That omission does not rinse Arecaceae if that autogiro does not rinse Arecaceae. fact20: Something that is a pale is not a Dacrydium and is dysplastic. ; $hypothesis$ = That locale is not unimpressionable. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That dance is not impressionable.

¬{C}{a}

fact1: That devilfish is bacterial and it is impressionable. fact2: This mine enthuses. fact3: The jackstraw is a Annunciation. fact4: If that some person stalemates stretchability but it is not a Heterotheca is not right then it is not a kind of a Annunciation. fact5: If the spermatozoon is a kind of a acrostic and is a Turfan the spermatozoon is not a Annunciation. fact6: If some person is a kind of a fellowship and controverts Pagurus he/she does not skew largo. fact7: The fact that if that dance is a Szell and remains palaeogeology that dance is not impressionable is true. fact8: That dance is strategic and it is a aroid. fact9: That dance is a mottle and the thing defuses Cupressaceae. fact10: Some man is not impressionable if it enthuses and is a kind of a Annunciation. fact11: If something ADDS shibboleth and is a Anaheim then this thing does not discontinue Sphenopsida. fact12: That dance is a Annunciation. fact13: That dance enthuses. fact14: The fact that some man stalemates stretchability and is not a kind of a Heterotheca does not hold if it depreciates. fact15: Morgan is a Annunciation. fact16: That dance is impressionable and she enthuses if this reboxetine is not a Annunciation. fact17: If the cellblock rends Plotinus and is impressionable that he/she is not an ordering is right. fact18: If some man does roof disfunction and she/he is a Polypodiales then she/he does not behold Menuridae. fact19: Something does not ADD shibboleth if this longs and this is operable. fact20: That dance is a Psyllidae. fact21: That dance is operable. fact22: If that dance spays and it is a disconsolateness then it is unimpressionable.

fact1: ({DJ}{d} & {C}{d}) fact2: {A}{eu} fact3: {B}{in} fact4: (x): ¬({E}x & ¬{D}x) -> ¬{B}x fact5: ({HP}{ij} & {GM}{ij}) -> ¬{B}{ij} fact6: (x): ({Q}x & {T}x) -> ¬{HM}x fact7: ({GJ}{a} & {FE}{a}) -> ¬{C}{a} fact8: ({JH}{a} & {DM}{a}) fact9: ({AJ}{a} & {FR}{a}) fact10: (x): ({A}x & {B}x) -> ¬{C}x fact11: (x): ({IT}x & {BL}x) -> ¬{AI}x fact12: {B}{a} fact13: {A}{a} fact14: (x): {F}x -> ¬({E}x & ¬{D}x) fact15: {B}{gn} fact16: ¬{B}{b} -> ({C}{a} & {A}{a}) fact17: ({FS}{cb} & {C}{cb}) -> ¬{EI}{cb} fact18: (x): ({FJ}x & {BG}x) -> ¬{DK}x fact19: (x): ({FG}x & {GK}x) -> ¬{IT}x fact20: {CN}{a} fact21: {GK}{a} fact22: ({K}{a} & {FB}{a}) -> ¬{C}{a}

That dance is impressionable.

{C}{a}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That devilfish is bacterial and it is impressionable. fact2: This mine enthuses. fact3: The jackstraw is a Annunciation. fact4: If that some person stalemates stretchability but it is not a Heterotheca is not right then it is not a kind of a Annunciation. fact5: If the spermatozoon is a kind of a acrostic and is a Turfan the spermatozoon is not a Annunciation. fact6: If some person is a kind of a fellowship and controverts Pagurus he/she does not skew largo. fact7: The fact that if that dance is a Szell and remains palaeogeology that dance is not impressionable is true. fact8: That dance is strategic and it is a aroid. fact9: That dance is a mottle and the thing defuses Cupressaceae. fact10: Some man is not impressionable if it enthuses and is a kind of a Annunciation. fact11: If something ADDS shibboleth and is a Anaheim then this thing does not discontinue Sphenopsida. fact12: That dance is a Annunciation. fact13: That dance enthuses. fact14: The fact that some man stalemates stretchability and is not a kind of a Heterotheca does not hold if it depreciates. fact15: Morgan is a Annunciation. fact16: That dance is impressionable and she enthuses if this reboxetine is not a Annunciation. fact17: If the cellblock rends Plotinus and is impressionable that he/she is not an ordering is right. fact18: If some man does roof disfunction and she/he is a Polypodiales then she/he does not behold Menuridae. fact19: Something does not ADD shibboleth if this longs and this is operable. fact20: That dance is a Psyllidae. fact21: That dance is operable. fact22: If that dance spays and it is a disconsolateness then it is unimpressionable. ; $hypothesis$ = That dance is not impressionable. ; $proof$ =

fact13 & fact12 -> int1: That dance enthuses and is a kind of a Annunciation.; fact10 -> int2: If that dance enthuses and it is a Annunciation then it is not impressionable.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That titan is not a Peronosporaceae.

¬{B}{a}

fact1: If that supergrass understands then this florilegium understands. fact2: Some person is catachrestical but it does not interiorise plagiocephaly if the fact that it is not a kind of a Cushitic hold. fact3: If someone does not understand it is not a Santalum and not a Arrhenius. fact4: That beachball does not decree warped. fact5: That beachball is not a Santalum if this florilegium is a Santalum. fact6: If something is not a Santalum then it does not decree warped. fact7: If that beachball is a folliculitis but it does not decree warped that titan is a Peronosporaceae. fact8: That beachball is British but it does not degrade. fact9: If some person does not twin it is not spatiotemporal. fact10: This florilegium is a Santalum and/or is a Arrhenius. fact11: If somebody permeates then that it is both not an oversupply and a Jamaican is incorrect. fact12: This florilegium does not decree warped. fact13: That nutlet is not a Arrhenius. fact14: Some man is a folliculitis and does not decree warped if that person is not a Santalum. fact15: If this florilegium either is a kind of a Santalum or is a Arrhenius or both the fact that that beachball is not a Santalum is correct. fact16: If the fact that that titan is both a folliculitis and a Santalum is true then that beachball is a Peronosporaceae. fact17: If the fact that that beachball is not a Santalum hold it does not decree warped. fact18: That titan does not understand if that this florilegium is not an oversupply but a Jamaican is false. fact19: If something that is not a kind of a Santalum is not a Arrhenius that thing is not a Peronosporaceae. fact20: That titan is a Peronosporaceae if that beachball is a folliculitis and decrees warped.

fact1: {D}{c} -> {D}{b} fact2: (x): ¬{AK}x -> ({BI}x & ¬{CH}x) fact3: (x): ¬{D}x -> (¬{A}x & ¬{C}x) fact4: ¬{AB}{aa} fact5: {A}{b} -> ¬{A}{aa} fact6: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬{AB}x fact7: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{a} fact8: ({CD}{aa} & ¬{AE}{aa}) fact9: (x): ¬{BF}x -> ¬{FJ}x fact10: ({A}{b} v {C}{b}) fact11: (x): {G}x -> ¬(¬{F}x & {E}x) fact12: ¬{AB}{b} fact13: ¬{C}{jg} fact14: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact15: ({A}{b} v {C}{b}) -> ¬{A}{aa} fact16: ({AA}{a} & {A}{a}) -> {B}{aa} fact17: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬{AB}{aa} fact18: ¬(¬{F}{b} & {E}{b}) -> ¬{D}{a} fact19: (x): (¬{A}x & ¬{C}x) -> ¬{B}x fact20: ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{a}

That titan is not a Peronosporaceae.

¬{B}{a}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that supergrass understands then this florilegium understands. fact2: Some person is catachrestical but it does not interiorise plagiocephaly if the fact that it is not a kind of a Cushitic hold. fact3: If someone does not understand it is not a Santalum and not a Arrhenius. fact4: That beachball does not decree warped. fact5: That beachball is not a Santalum if this florilegium is a Santalum. fact6: If something is not a Santalum then it does not decree warped. fact7: If that beachball is a folliculitis but it does not decree warped that titan is a Peronosporaceae. fact8: That beachball is British but it does not degrade. fact9: If some person does not twin it is not spatiotemporal. fact10: This florilegium is a Santalum and/or is a Arrhenius. fact11: If somebody permeates then that it is both not an oversupply and a Jamaican is incorrect. fact12: This florilegium does not decree warped. fact13: That nutlet is not a Arrhenius. fact14: Some man is a folliculitis and does not decree warped if that person is not a Santalum. fact15: If this florilegium either is a kind of a Santalum or is a Arrhenius or both the fact that that beachball is not a Santalum is correct. fact16: If the fact that that titan is both a folliculitis and a Santalum is true then that beachball is a Peronosporaceae. fact17: If the fact that that beachball is not a Santalum hold it does not decree warped. fact18: That titan does not understand if that this florilegium is not an oversupply but a Jamaican is false. fact19: If something that is not a kind of a Santalum is not a Arrhenius that thing is not a Peronosporaceae. fact20: That titan is a Peronosporaceae if that beachball is a folliculitis and decrees warped. ; $hypothesis$ = That titan is not a Peronosporaceae. ; $proof$ =

fact14 -> int1: If that beachball is not a kind of a Santalum then that is a folliculitis that does not decree warped.; fact15 & fact10 -> int2: That beachball is not a Santalum.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That beachball is a folliculitis and does not decree warped.; int3 & fact7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

The fact that that that taxonomist is compressible hold if that taxonomist is a saying or that one is not a kind of a paramilitary or both is not true.

¬(({AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa})

fact1: If that taxonomist is a kind of a saying it is compressible. fact2: If either that taxonomist is apiarian or this one is not a paramilitary or both then that taxonomist contrasts Novgorod. fact3: If some person is a Casals and/or she is not unorganised she hymns connoisseurship. fact4: If either something is a kind of a Sanguinaria or this thing is not genitourinary or both this thing is Senegalese. fact5: That taxonomist is compressible if that taxonomist prostrates or is not Nicene or both. fact6: If some man is a kind of a saying and/or it is a paramilitary the fact that it is not compressible does not hold. fact7: Something that does hymn connoisseurship or is non-Nicene or both is not incapable. fact8: Something is thallophytic if either the thing is uncertain or the thing is not memberless or both. fact9: If the dyewood either fettles amebiosis or is not a kind of an accusative or both then this one is lossless. fact10: Somebody is not disingenuous if it lowers Priam and/or it does not promulgate ablepharia. fact11: Someone that Monitors deictic or is dissimilar or both is not non-Ukrainian. fact12: If that taxonomist is a kind of a gaudiness or it is not a saying or both then it mines oblivion. fact13: Somebody is compressible if it is a kind of a saying and/or it is not a kind of a paramilitary. fact14: That taxonomist is compressible if that taxonomist maculates prize or is not stoichiometric or both. fact15: Some person is compressible if it is a saying. fact16: If that taxonomist is a saying and/or is a paramilitary then it is compressible. fact17: Some man is genitourinary if that one does focalise Cherepovets and/or is not a kind of a Fraulein. fact18: If somebody bruises succubus and/or is not a kind of a Minotaur that person does lower Priam. fact19: Something that either is exuvial or is not multinucleate or both is heterodactyl.

fact1: {AA}{aa} -> {B}{aa} fact2: ({CB}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {L}{aa} fact3: (x): ({HS}x v ¬{IA}x) -> {BB}x fact4: (x): ({AP}x v ¬{HR}x) -> {HG}x fact5: ({JJ}{aa} v ¬{DE}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} fact6: (x): ({AA}x v {AB}x) -> {B}x fact7: (x): ({BB}x v ¬{DE}x) -> {CM}x fact8: (x): ({FM}x v ¬{BK}x) -> {JH}x fact9: ({CF}{df} v ¬{CS}{df}) -> {DA}{df} fact10: (x): ({IN}x v ¬{CJ}x) -> {AS}x fact11: (x): ({AK}x v ¬{CT}x) -> {II}x fact12: ({GJ}{aa} v ¬{AA}{aa}) -> {CC}{aa} fact13: (x): ({AA}x v ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x fact14: ({M}{aa} v ¬{AF}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} fact15: (x): {AA}x -> {B}x fact16: ({AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} fact17: (x): ({JF}x v ¬{AM}x) -> {HR}x fact18: (x): ({G}x v ¬{GD}x) -> {IN}x fact19: (x): ({I}x v ¬{AC}x) -> {JG}x

DISPROVED

DISPROVED

$facts$ = fact1: If that taxonomist is a kind of a saying it is compressible. fact2: If either that taxonomist is apiarian or this one is not a paramilitary or both then that taxonomist contrasts Novgorod. fact3: If some person is a Casals and/or she is not unorganised she hymns connoisseurship. fact4: If either something is a kind of a Sanguinaria or this thing is not genitourinary or both this thing is Senegalese. fact5: That taxonomist is compressible if that taxonomist prostrates or is not Nicene or both. fact6: If some man is a kind of a saying and/or it is a paramilitary the fact that it is not compressible does not hold. fact7: Something that does hymn connoisseurship or is non-Nicene or both is not incapable. fact8: Something is thallophytic if either the thing is uncertain or the thing is not memberless or both. fact9: If the dyewood either fettles amebiosis or is not a kind of an accusative or both then this one is lossless. fact10: Somebody is not disingenuous if it lowers Priam and/or it does not promulgate ablepharia. fact11: Someone that Monitors deictic or is dissimilar or both is not non-Ukrainian. fact12: If that taxonomist is a kind of a gaudiness or it is not a saying or both then it mines oblivion. fact13: Somebody is compressible if it is a kind of a saying and/or it is not a kind of a paramilitary. fact14: That taxonomist is compressible if that taxonomist maculates prize or is not stoichiometric or both. fact15: Some person is compressible if it is a saying. fact16: If that taxonomist is a saying and/or is a paramilitary then it is compressible. fact17: Some man is genitourinary if that one does focalise Cherepovets and/or is not a kind of a Fraulein. fact18: If somebody bruises succubus and/or is not a kind of a Minotaur that person does lower Priam. fact19: Something that either is exuvial or is not multinucleate or both is heterodactyl. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that that taxonomist is compressible hold if that taxonomist is a saying or that one is not a kind of a paramilitary or both is not true. ; $proof$ =

fact13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

Let's assume that this recompensing does not happens and this pounding does not happens.

(¬{AA} & ¬{AB})

fact1: The sculpting does not occurs if the unionization but notthe shamble occurs. fact2: That gouge does not occurs and that thalassicness does not occurs. fact3: This falsification does not happens. fact4: If that swearing myodynia happens that arterioscleroticness occurs. fact5: That this recompensing but notthis pounding occurs leads to this non-arterioscleroticness. fact6: That this recompensing but notthis pounding happens is false. fact7: That the faucalness occurs but the overgrowing Bombay does not happens is false. fact8: That unbelievableness does not occurs and that pretorianness does not occurs. fact9: If the fact that that palatialness does not happens is correct the fact that that swearing myodynia and this non-arterioscleroticness occurs is wrong. fact10: If the abstemiousness does not occurs but that bolivia happens the fledgeding does not happens. fact11: That swearing myodynia happens. fact12: The abstemiousness does not happens but that bolivia happens if this landslip does not occurs. fact13: That aestivating occurs. fact14: That this recompensing does not occurs and this pounding does not occurs is caused by that that swearing myodynia does not occurs. fact15: If the fledgeding does not occurs this thrash does not happens and that palatialness does not happens. fact16: That this cometicness happens prevents that that arenicolousness does not occurs. fact17: The fact that that the docking Testudinata happens but that session does not happens is wrong is true. fact18: That this recompensing does not happens and this pounding happens is false.

fact1: ({GQ} & ¬{GT}) -> ¬{AS} fact2: (¬{AE} & ¬{EQ}) fact3: ¬{CQ} fact4: {A} -> {B} fact5: ({AA} & ¬{AB}) -> ¬{B} fact6: ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) fact7: ¬({AL} & ¬{HH}) fact8: (¬{IL} & ¬{CD}) fact9: ¬{C} -> ¬({A} & ¬{B}) fact10: (¬{F} & {G}) -> ¬{E} fact11: {A} fact12: ¬{H} -> (¬{F} & {G}) fact13: {BC} fact14: ¬{A} -> (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) fact15: ¬{E} -> (¬{D} & ¬{C}) fact16: {EB} -> {BQ} fact17: ¬({EH} & ¬{CK}) fact18: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB})

Let's assume that this recompensing does not happens and this pounding does not happens.

(¬{AA} & ¬{AB})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The sculpting does not occurs if the unionization but notthe shamble occurs. fact2: That gouge does not occurs and that thalassicness does not occurs. fact3: This falsification does not happens. fact4: If that swearing myodynia happens that arterioscleroticness occurs. fact5: That this recompensing but notthis pounding occurs leads to this non-arterioscleroticness. fact6: That this recompensing but notthis pounding happens is false. fact7: That the faucalness occurs but the overgrowing Bombay does not happens is false. fact8: That unbelievableness does not occurs and that pretorianness does not occurs. fact9: If the fact that that palatialness does not happens is correct the fact that that swearing myodynia and this non-arterioscleroticness occurs is wrong. fact10: If the abstemiousness does not occurs but that bolivia happens the fledgeding does not happens. fact11: That swearing myodynia happens. fact12: The abstemiousness does not happens but that bolivia happens if this landslip does not occurs. fact13: That aestivating occurs. fact14: That this recompensing does not occurs and this pounding does not occurs is caused by that that swearing myodynia does not occurs. fact15: If the fledgeding does not occurs this thrash does not happens and that palatialness does not happens. fact16: That this cometicness happens prevents that that arenicolousness does not occurs. fact17: The fact that that the docking Testudinata happens but that session does not happens is wrong is true. fact18: That this recompensing does not happens and this pounding happens is false. ; $hypothesis$ = Let's assume that this recompensing does not happens and this pounding does not happens. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That that elytron is a kind of molecular thing that is not flatter does not hold.

¬({A}{b} & ¬{C}{b})

fact1: If something is a kind of a Farragut that is molecular. fact2: The fact that somebody is a kind of molecular one that is not flatter does not hold if it does not Grass patness. fact3: That elytron is not mecopterous if that elytron is cheerful and it is not efficacious. fact4: If the fact that this acarid is a resource and that is a Windaus is incorrect that that is not peaty is correct. fact5: That if that elytron is a Trotskyism but it does not slither then that elytron is not a kind of a liberalism is right. fact6: If something is not peaty then the fact that that is flatter and Grasses patness does not hold. fact7: If that elytron is not mecopterous this thing is a Trotskyism and this thing does not slither. fact8: If that elytron is not a liberalism then it is both a Farragut and crustose. fact9: That elytron does not Grass patness if this acarid hedges Pouteria but it is not multidimensional. fact10: That elytron is not uncheerful and not efficacious. fact11: This acarid hedges Pouteria and is not multidimensional.

fact1: (x): {D}x -> {A}x fact2: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬({A}x & ¬{C}x) fact3: (¬{N}{b} & ¬{M}{b}) -> ¬{L}{b} fact4: ¬({I}{a} & {H}{a}) -> ¬{G}{a} fact5: ({J}{b} & ¬{K}{b}) -> ¬{F}{b} fact6: (x): ¬{G}x -> ¬({C}x & {B}x) fact7: ¬{L}{b} -> ({J}{b} & ¬{K}{b}) fact8: ¬{F}{b} -> ({D}{b} & {E}{b}) fact9: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact10: (¬{N}{b} & ¬{M}{b}) fact11: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a})

That elytron is molecular but the thing is not flatter.

({A}{b} & ¬{C}{b})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If something is a kind of a Farragut that is molecular. fact2: The fact that somebody is a kind of molecular one that is not flatter does not hold if it does not Grass patness. fact3: That elytron is not mecopterous if that elytron is cheerful and it is not efficacious. fact4: If the fact that this acarid is a resource and that is a Windaus is incorrect that that is not peaty is correct. fact5: That if that elytron is a Trotskyism but it does not slither then that elytron is not a kind of a liberalism is right. fact6: If something is not peaty then the fact that that is flatter and Grasses patness does not hold. fact7: If that elytron is not mecopterous this thing is a Trotskyism and this thing does not slither. fact8: If that elytron is not a liberalism then it is both a Farragut and crustose. fact9: That elytron does not Grass patness if this acarid hedges Pouteria but it is not multidimensional. fact10: That elytron is not uncheerful and not efficacious. fact11: This acarid hedges Pouteria and is not multidimensional. ; $hypothesis$ = That that elytron is a kind of molecular thing that is not flatter does not hold. ; $proof$ =

fact9 & fact11 -> int1: The fact that that elytron does not Grass patness is right.; fact2 -> int2: The fact that that elytron is molecular but it is non-flatter does not hold if it does not Grass patness.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That stipule is alpine.

{B}{a}

fact1: That stipule is not alpine if the fact that it is not mercantile is correct. fact2: That stipule is alpine if that talent is mercantile. fact3: Someone is not mercantile if that he is a Physostigma and/or he is not non-alpine is false. fact4: If that something is a kind of a Physostigma hold that it is not mercantile or fictile or both is false. fact5: This metabola is not a Riksmaal if the person is not a Riksmaal and/or the person is a little. fact6: That subverter is not alpine if that subverter is not a kind of a quaff. fact7: This snowsuit is hydrolyzable if the fact that this hone either is hydrolyzable or does not preordain luridness or both is incorrect. fact8: That carcase is not a Mexican but a palilalia if this snowsuit is hydrolyzable. fact9: If that stipule is not fictile the fact that that camp is a Physostigma or it is alpine or both is false. fact10: The rubble does not preordain luridness if this seminarist is monocotyledonous and that preordain luridness. fact11: If that carcase is not a Mexican but a palilalia then that anovulation is a kind of a Mexican. fact12: This seminarist is monocotyledonous and preordains luridness if this metabola is not a kind of a Riksmaal. fact13: That talent is mercantile if the fact that that anovulation is mercantile or fictile or both is incorrect. fact14: That stipule is non-mercantile. fact15: If something is not a Ninkharsag and it is not a kind of a MBD it is a Physostigma. fact16: Somebody is not a kind of a Ninkharsag and it is not a kind of a MBD if it is a Mexican.

fact1: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{B}{a} fact2: {A}{b} -> {B}{a} fact3: (x): ¬({C}x v {B}x) -> ¬{A}x fact4: (x): {C}x -> ¬(¬{A}x v {D}x) fact5: (¬{L}{i} v {M}{i}) -> ¬{L}{i} fact6: ¬{CP}{cm} -> ¬{B}{cm} fact7: ¬({H}{f} v ¬{K}{f}) -> {H}{e} fact8: {H}{e} -> (¬{G}{d} & {I}{d}) fact9: ¬{D}{a} -> ¬({C}{ak} v {B}{ak}) fact10: ({J}{h} & {K}{h}) -> ¬{K}{g} fact11: (¬{G}{d} & {I}{d}) -> {G}{c} fact12: ¬{L}{i} -> ({J}{h} & {K}{h}) fact13: ¬(¬{A}{c} v {D}{c}) -> {A}{b} fact14: ¬{A}{a} fact15: (x): (¬{F}x & ¬{E}x) -> {C}x fact16: (x): {G}x -> (¬{F}x & ¬{E}x)

That stipule is alpine.

{B}{a}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That stipule is not alpine if the fact that it is not mercantile is correct. fact2: That stipule is alpine if that talent is mercantile. fact3: Someone is not mercantile if that he is a Physostigma and/or he is not non-alpine is false. fact4: If that something is a kind of a Physostigma hold that it is not mercantile or fictile or both is false. fact5: This metabola is not a Riksmaal if the person is not a Riksmaal and/or the person is a little. fact6: That subverter is not alpine if that subverter is not a kind of a quaff. fact7: This snowsuit is hydrolyzable if the fact that this hone either is hydrolyzable or does not preordain luridness or both is incorrect. fact8: That carcase is not a Mexican but a palilalia if this snowsuit is hydrolyzable. fact9: If that stipule is not fictile the fact that that camp is a Physostigma or it is alpine or both is false. fact10: The rubble does not preordain luridness if this seminarist is monocotyledonous and that preordain luridness. fact11: If that carcase is not a Mexican but a palilalia then that anovulation is a kind of a Mexican. fact12: This seminarist is monocotyledonous and preordains luridness if this metabola is not a kind of a Riksmaal. fact13: That talent is mercantile if the fact that that anovulation is mercantile or fictile or both is incorrect. fact14: That stipule is non-mercantile. fact15: If something is not a Ninkharsag and it is not a kind of a MBD it is a Physostigma. fact16: Somebody is not a kind of a Ninkharsag and it is not a kind of a MBD if it is a Mexican. ; $hypothesis$ = That stipule is alpine. ; $proof$ =

fact1 & fact14 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That circularness does not occurs.

¬{B}

fact1: That that periodicalness does not occurs and that shiatsu does not happens results in that that circularness does not happens. fact2: That circularness occurs if that this non-circularness and this deserted occurs does not hold. fact3: The fact that that vicennialness happens but that deepening Bozeman does not occurs is wrong if this yielding winter happens. fact4: This deserted happens. fact5: That periodicalness does not occurs and that shiatsu does not occurs if this deserted happens. fact6: That this effacing curableness does not happens and/or that this belling competitiveness does not happens prevents this effacing curableness. fact7: If this crushing does not happens that that definiteness does not happens and this budgeting Nebraska does not happens is not correct. fact8: This arboreousness does not occurs if that that definiteness does not happens and this budgeting Nebraska does not occurs does not hold. fact9: This belling competitiveness does not occurs if that the interrogative and/or this tinking occurs does not hold. fact10: The fact that that cleanup does not happens and this deserted does not occurs is incorrect if the fact that that circularness occurs hold. fact11: This non-periodicalness is caused by that this deserted occurs. fact12: If the fact that that vicennialness occurs but that deepening Bozeman does not occurs is wrong then the fact that this crushing does not occurs is true. fact13: That circularness happens and this dogfight occurs if the fact that this arboreousness does not occurs is right. fact14: That this non-circularness and this deserted happens is incorrect if this dogfight does not occurs. fact15: The feminism does not happens but this yielding winter occurs if this effacing curableness does not occurs. fact16: If the fact that the fact that that cleanup does not occurs and this deserted does not occurs hold does not hold then that that cleanup does not happens is false.

fact1: (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) -> ¬{B} fact2: ¬(¬{B} & {A}) -> {B} fact3: {J} -> ¬({H} & ¬{I}) fact4: {A} fact5: {A} -> (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) fact6: (¬{L} v ¬{N}) -> ¬{L} fact7: ¬{G} -> ¬(¬{F} & ¬{E}) fact8: ¬(¬{F} & ¬{E}) -> ¬{D} fact9: ¬({M} v {O}) -> ¬{N} fact10: {B} -> ¬(¬{BK} & ¬{A}) fact11: {A} -> ¬{AA} fact12: ¬({H} & ¬{I}) -> ¬{G} fact13: ¬{D} -> ({B} & {C}) fact14: ¬{C} -> ¬(¬{B} & {A}) fact15: ¬{L} -> (¬{K} & {J}) fact16: ¬(¬{BK} & ¬{A}) -> {BK}

That circularness happens.

{B}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That that periodicalness does not occurs and that shiatsu does not happens results in that that circularness does not happens. fact2: That circularness occurs if that this non-circularness and this deserted occurs does not hold. fact3: The fact that that vicennialness happens but that deepening Bozeman does not occurs is wrong if this yielding winter happens. fact4: This deserted happens. fact5: That periodicalness does not occurs and that shiatsu does not occurs if this deserted happens. fact6: That this effacing curableness does not happens and/or that this belling competitiveness does not happens prevents this effacing curableness. fact7: If this crushing does not happens that that definiteness does not happens and this budgeting Nebraska does not happens is not correct. fact8: This arboreousness does not occurs if that that definiteness does not happens and this budgeting Nebraska does not occurs does not hold. fact9: This belling competitiveness does not occurs if that the interrogative and/or this tinking occurs does not hold. fact10: The fact that that cleanup does not happens and this deserted does not occurs is incorrect if the fact that that circularness occurs hold. fact11: This non-periodicalness is caused by that this deserted occurs. fact12: If the fact that that vicennialness occurs but that deepening Bozeman does not occurs is wrong then the fact that this crushing does not occurs is true. fact13: That circularness happens and this dogfight occurs if the fact that this arboreousness does not occurs is right. fact14: That this non-circularness and this deserted happens is incorrect if this dogfight does not occurs. fact15: The feminism does not happens but this yielding winter occurs if this effacing curableness does not occurs. fact16: If the fact that the fact that that cleanup does not occurs and this deserted does not occurs hold does not hold then that that cleanup does not happens is false. ; $hypothesis$ = That circularness does not occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact5 & fact4 -> int1: That periodicalness does not happens and that shiatsu does not happens.; int1 & fact1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That fossilising does not occurs and this fulfillment does not happens.

(¬{C} & ¬{D})

fact1: That this sleuperson herpangia occurs causes that that fossilising does not happens. fact2: This fulfillment does not occurs if both that report and this non-Dostoevskianness happens. fact3: The storming occurs if that that mirroring perquisite does not occurs and the consciousness does not occurs does not hold. fact4: That both this non-seraphicness and this bandaging Carcharhinus occurs does not hold. fact5: If the pitcher happens the alining elastosis occurs. fact6: The storming triggers that this bandaging Carcharhinus but notthe raddling Taurotragus occurs. fact7: That that Dostoevskianness happens hold. fact8: If the carillon happens then that both this non-piraticalness and this non-warmerness happens is incorrect. fact9: The crystallisedness occurs. fact10: The mocking hypocorism occurs. fact11: That notthe faltering but the unobligatedness occurs does not hold. fact12: That that Dostoevskianness occurs results in that report. fact13: That that sleuthing herpangia happens is caused by that interspecificness. fact14: If this bandaging Carcharhinus occurs that that report but notthat Dostoevskianness happens hold. fact15: If the externalization occurs then the fact that this redepositing treasured does not happens and this atomisticalness does not occurs is false. fact16: The fact that notthat fossilising but this fulfillment happens is incorrect if that report happens. fact17: That that fossilising but notthis fulfillment happens is not right. fact18: That interspecificness happens and that sounder happens if that the choreography does not happens hold. fact19: If that report happens then the fact that that fossilising does not happens and this fulfillment does not occurs is false.

fact1: {E} -> ¬{C} fact2: ({B} & ¬{A}) -> ¬{D} fact3: ¬(¬{K} & ¬{L}) -> {I} fact4: ¬(¬{JF} & {F}) fact5: {IH} -> {II} fact6: {I} -> ({F} & ¬{H}) fact7: {A} fact8: {GR} -> ¬(¬{FJ} & ¬{IK}) fact9: {EA} fact10: {HK} fact11: ¬(¬{HI} & {GG}) fact12: {A} -> {B} fact13: {G} -> {E} fact14: {F} -> ({B} & ¬{A}) fact15: {HR} -> ¬(¬{JB} & ¬{N}) fact16: {B} -> ¬(¬{C} & {D}) fact17: ¬({C} & ¬{D}) fact18: ¬{O} -> ({G} & {J}) fact19: {B} -> ¬(¬{C} & ¬{D})

That fossilising does not occurs and this fulfillment does not happens.

(¬{C} & ¬{D})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That this sleuperson herpangia occurs causes that that fossilising does not happens. fact2: This fulfillment does not occurs if both that report and this non-Dostoevskianness happens. fact3: The storming occurs if that that mirroring perquisite does not occurs and the consciousness does not occurs does not hold. fact4: That both this non-seraphicness and this bandaging Carcharhinus occurs does not hold. fact5: If the pitcher happens the alining elastosis occurs. fact6: The storming triggers that this bandaging Carcharhinus but notthe raddling Taurotragus occurs. fact7: That that Dostoevskianness happens hold. fact8: If the carillon happens then that both this non-piraticalness and this non-warmerness happens is incorrect. fact9: The crystallisedness occurs. fact10: The mocking hypocorism occurs. fact11: That notthe faltering but the unobligatedness occurs does not hold. fact12: That that Dostoevskianness occurs results in that report. fact13: That that sleuthing herpangia happens is caused by that interspecificness. fact14: If this bandaging Carcharhinus occurs that that report but notthat Dostoevskianness happens hold. fact15: If the externalization occurs then the fact that this redepositing treasured does not happens and this atomisticalness does not occurs is false. fact16: The fact that notthat fossilising but this fulfillment happens is incorrect if that report happens. fact17: That that fossilising but notthis fulfillment happens is not right. fact18: That interspecificness happens and that sounder happens if that the choreography does not happens hold. fact19: If that report happens then the fact that that fossilising does not happens and this fulfillment does not occurs is false. ; $hypothesis$ = That fossilising does not occurs and this fulfillment does not happens. ; $proof$ =

fact12 & fact7 -> int1: That report happens.; int1 & fact19 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That everything is not a kind of a graze is false.

¬((x): ¬{A}x)

fact1: Something is a graze and is not an affiliate if it is violable. fact2: If somebody is not a Centropomidae the fact that it is inviolable and extenuates Plzen is not correct. fact3: The fact that everything is not cometic is correct. fact4: Every man is not carnivorous. fact5: That everything is non-insurrectional is true. fact6: Everything is not a Pteris. fact7: Everybody is not a graze. fact8: Every person is not anoperineal. fact9: Everybody is not a clue. fact10: If something is not a Centropomidae then the fact that this is violable and a graze does not hold. fact11: Every person does not extenuate Plzen and is not a Centropomidae.

fact1: (x): {B}x -> ({A}x & ¬{GP}x) fact2: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬(¬{B}x & {D}x) fact3: (x): ¬{ID}x fact4: (x): ¬{IF}x fact5: (x): ¬{ER}x fact6: (x): ¬{JE}x fact7: (x): ¬{A}x fact8: (x): ¬{HC}x fact9: (x): ¬{BJ}x fact10: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬({B}x & {A}x) fact11: (x): (¬{D}x & ¬{C}x)

Everything is not an affiliate.

(x): ¬{GP}x

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Something is a graze and is not an affiliate if it is violable. fact2: If somebody is not a Centropomidae the fact that it is inviolable and extenuates Plzen is not correct. fact3: The fact that everything is not cometic is correct. fact4: Every man is not carnivorous. fact5: That everything is non-insurrectional is true. fact6: Everything is not a Pteris. fact7: Everybody is not a graze. fact8: Every person is not anoperineal. fact9: Everybody is not a clue. fact10: If something is not a Centropomidae then the fact that this is violable and a graze does not hold. fact11: Every person does not extenuate Plzen and is not a Centropomidae. ; $hypothesis$ = That everything is not a kind of a graze is false. ; $proof$ =

fact7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

If that biogeographicness happens then either this multilingualness occurs or this gemination does not happens or both.

{A} -> ({B} v ¬{C})

fact1: That that heterosporousness occurs leads to that this gemination but notthis multilingualness occurs. fact2: This multilingualness occurs if that biogeographicness happens. fact3: If this multilingualness does not occurs then that Delphianness occurs and that biogeographicness happens.

fact1: {D} -> ({C} & ¬{B}) fact2: {A} -> {B} fact3: ¬{B} -> ({EJ} & {A})

That Delphianness happens.

{EJ}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That that heterosporousness occurs leads to that this gemination but notthis multilingualness occurs. fact2: This multilingualness occurs if that biogeographicness happens. fact3: If this multilingualness does not occurs then that Delphianness occurs and that biogeographicness happens. ; $hypothesis$ = If that biogeographicness happens then either this multilingualness occurs or this gemination does not happens or both. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that that biogeographicness happens.; fact2 & assump1 -> int1: That this multilingualness occurs hold.; int1 -> int2: This multilingualness occurs and/or this gemination does not occurs.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This huckster is not autoradiographic.

¬{B}{c}

fact1: The fact that the Ubermensch harangues Desmodium and does not scab chumminess does not hold. fact2: This pallium is not upstream. fact3: The fact that this pallium is not genetical is true. fact4: This huckster is not autoradiographic if that this jaguar is not thermogravimetric and not incorrigible is not correct. fact5: The fact that this jaguar is thermogravimetric and is not incorrigible is wrong. fact6: If this pallium is not upstream the fact that this jaguar is not thermogravimetric and is not incorrigible is incorrect. fact7: Something that is not a busted or not a trucking or both is not a busted. fact8: Someone is autoradiographic and it is upstream if it is not a busted.

fact1: ¬({CD}{as} & ¬{CK}{as}) fact2: ¬{A}{a} fact3: ¬{HI}{a} fact4: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) -> ¬{B}{c} fact5: ¬({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact6: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact7: (x): (¬{C}x v ¬{E}x) -> ¬{C}x fact8: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({B}x & {A}x)

That this huckster is autoradiographic hold.

{B}{c}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that the Ubermensch harangues Desmodium and does not scab chumminess does not hold. fact2: This pallium is not upstream. fact3: The fact that this pallium is not genetical is true. fact4: This huckster is not autoradiographic if that this jaguar is not thermogravimetric and not incorrigible is not correct. fact5: The fact that this jaguar is thermogravimetric and is not incorrigible is wrong. fact6: If this pallium is not upstream the fact that this jaguar is not thermogravimetric and is not incorrigible is incorrect. fact7: Something that is not a busted or not a trucking or both is not a busted. fact8: Someone is autoradiographic and it is upstream if it is not a busted. ; $hypothesis$ = This huckster is not autoradiographic. ; $proof$ =

fact6 & fact2 -> int1: That this jaguar is a kind of non-thermogravimetric man that is not incorrigible is wrong.; int1 & fact4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That that ixodid is non-inextensible person that does not reconnoitre Pyrolaceae is false.

¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a})

fact1: If that boss is a kind of non-biped one that does not snivel Pushkin the hireling does snivel Pushkin. fact2: A non-inextensible person is inextensible person that does not reconnoitre Pyrolaceae. fact3: That boss is non-biped man that does not snivel Pushkin. fact4: That boxershorts is not a shocked and that is not neutral if the fact that that that is a shocked is wrong is not false. fact5: That ixodid is not Dickensian. fact6: If the fact that that indapamide does not bobble laparocele and/or he/she drives Dipogon does not hold this hominid is not biologistic. fact7: If this hominid is not biologistic that that pier abandons carful and is mononucleate is not right. fact8: The chloroform is a kind of major thing that is not a Gerreidae. fact9: That if that goldcrest is non-propagative and it does not ration entrancement then that goldcrest is not Celtic is right. fact10: That that indapamide does not bobble laparocele and/or that drives Dipogon is incorrect if that delicacy is a kind of a Datura. fact11: If that transcendentalist is not clamatorial then that delicacy is a McAllen. fact12: That ixodid is not seminiferous. fact13: If the hireling snivels Pushkin then that transcendentalist is not juiceless and/or this person is not clamatorial. fact14: If the fact that something does abandon carful but it is not a kind of a wear is false then it is mononucleate. fact15: If some person transitivises psi and/or is inextensible then the fact that the person is not propagative is true. fact16: If the fact that that pier abandons carful and is mononucleate is wrong that abridger is not mononucleate. fact17: If that ixodid is non-mononucleate then this bedfellow is inextensible and reconnoitres Pyrolaceae. fact18: If that transcendentalist is not juiceless that delicacy is a McAllen. fact19: A McAllen is a Datura. fact20: If some person transitivises psi the fact that it is not inextensible and does not reconnoitre Pyrolaceae is false. fact21: That ixodid transitivises psi if that abridger is mononucleate. fact22: That ixodid is not propagative but major.

fact1: (¬{O}{i} & ¬{N}{i}) -> {N}{h} fact2: (x): ¬{B}x -> (¬{B}x & ¬{C}x) fact3: (¬{O}{i} & ¬{N}{i}) fact4: ¬{EN}{gh} -> (¬{EN}{gh} & ¬{FJ}{gh}) fact5: ¬{CI}{a} fact6: ¬(¬{I}{e} v {H}{e}) -> ¬{G}{d} fact7: ¬{G}{d} -> ¬({F}{c} & {D}{c}) fact8: (¬{AB}{cl} & ¬{FI}{cl}) fact9: (¬{AA}{bi} & ¬{EF}{bi}) -> ¬{IP}{bi} fact10: {J}{f} -> ¬(¬{I}{e} v {H}{e}) fact11: ¬{L}{g} -> {K}{f} fact12: ¬{HO}{a} fact13: {N}{h} -> (¬{M}{g} v ¬{L}{g}) fact14: (x): ¬({F}x & ¬{E}x) -> {D}x fact15: (x): ({A}x v {B}x) -> ¬{AA}x fact16: ¬({F}{c} & {D}{c}) -> ¬{D}{b} fact17: ¬{D}{a} -> ({B}{ij} & {C}{ij}) fact18: ¬{M}{g} -> {K}{f} fact19: (x): {K}x -> {J}x fact20: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{B}x & ¬{C}x) fact21: {D}{b} -> {A}{a} fact22: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a})

That that ixodid is non-inextensible person that does not reconnoitre Pyrolaceae is false.

¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that boss is a kind of non-biped one that does not snivel Pushkin the hireling does snivel Pushkin. fact2: A non-inextensible person is inextensible person that does not reconnoitre Pyrolaceae. fact3: That boss is non-biped man that does not snivel Pushkin. fact4: That boxershorts is not a shocked and that is not neutral if the fact that that that is a shocked is wrong is not false. fact5: That ixodid is not Dickensian. fact6: If the fact that that indapamide does not bobble laparocele and/or he/she drives Dipogon does not hold this hominid is not biologistic. fact7: If this hominid is not biologistic that that pier abandons carful and is mononucleate is not right. fact8: The chloroform is a kind of major thing that is not a Gerreidae. fact9: That if that goldcrest is non-propagative and it does not ration entrancement then that goldcrest is not Celtic is right. fact10: That that indapamide does not bobble laparocele and/or that drives Dipogon is incorrect if that delicacy is a kind of a Datura. fact11: If that transcendentalist is not clamatorial then that delicacy is a McAllen. fact12: That ixodid is not seminiferous. fact13: If the hireling snivels Pushkin then that transcendentalist is not juiceless and/or this person is not clamatorial. fact14: If the fact that something does abandon carful but it is not a kind of a wear is false then it is mononucleate. fact15: If some person transitivises psi and/or is inextensible then the fact that the person is not propagative is true. fact16: If the fact that that pier abandons carful and is mononucleate is wrong that abridger is not mononucleate. fact17: If that ixodid is non-mononucleate then this bedfellow is inextensible and reconnoitres Pyrolaceae. fact18: If that transcendentalist is not juiceless that delicacy is a McAllen. fact19: A McAllen is a Datura. fact20: If some person transitivises psi the fact that it is not inextensible and does not reconnoitre Pyrolaceae is false. fact21: That ixodid transitivises psi if that abridger is mononucleate. fact22: That ixodid is not propagative but major. ; $hypothesis$ = That that ixodid is non-inextensible person that does not reconnoitre Pyrolaceae is false. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That snorkeling happens.

{C}

fact1: If that liberalness does not occurs this cashing fascination and that wise happens. fact2: The Michigan happens. fact3: That both this non-worstness and that tapering occurs does not hold if this cashing fascination happens. fact4: That this unstimulatingness does not happens is brought about by that the adaxialness happens and that aikido happens. fact5: That tapering does not occurs if that both this non-worstness and that tapering happens does not hold. fact6: That this separate happens is prevented by that that souring covertness happens and the backed occurs. fact7: That aikido happens and the cringing occurs. fact8: That stowing incredulity occurs. fact9: That tapering happens. fact10: If both the leptorhineness and the laicising occurs that beetling does not occurs. fact11: This Hippocraticness occurs. fact12: That continuing misquote does not occurs. fact13: If that cliquishness does not happens then both this non-liberalness and the backed occurs. fact14: The enfeeblement and that bullying perleche occurs. fact15: This thriving occurs. fact16: The equilibrizing Blastocladia does not occurs. fact17: If this thriving happens and that tapering happens then that snorkeling does not occurs. fact18: The spiriting battalion and the samsara occurs. fact19: That tactualness does not occurs. fact20: The fact that that stealing savor happens is true. fact21: If that tapering does not occurs that snorkeling and this thriving happens.

fact1: ¬{G} -> ({D} & {F}) fact2: {IQ} fact3: {D} -> ¬(¬{E} & {B}) fact4: ({BA} & {EM}) -> ¬{FO} fact5: ¬(¬{E} & {B}) -> ¬{B} fact6: ({AF} & {H}) -> ¬{Q} fact7: ({EM} & {HU}) fact8: {AC} fact9: {B} fact10: ({BD} & {AI}) -> ¬{AH} fact11: {IU} fact12: ¬{IB} fact13: ¬{I} -> (¬{G} & {H}) fact14: ({AO} & {FU}) fact15: {A} fact16: ¬{IH} fact17: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} fact18: ({BN} & {FL}) fact19: ¬{ER} fact20: {II} fact21: ¬{B} -> ({C} & {A})

That snorkeling happens.

{C}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that liberalness does not occurs this cashing fascination and that wise happens. fact2: The Michigan happens. fact3: That both this non-worstness and that tapering occurs does not hold if this cashing fascination happens. fact4: That this unstimulatingness does not happens is brought about by that the adaxialness happens and that aikido happens. fact5: That tapering does not occurs if that both this non-worstness and that tapering happens does not hold. fact6: That this separate happens is prevented by that that souring covertness happens and the backed occurs. fact7: That aikido happens and the cringing occurs. fact8: That stowing incredulity occurs. fact9: That tapering happens. fact10: If both the leptorhineness and the laicising occurs that beetling does not occurs. fact11: This Hippocraticness occurs. fact12: That continuing misquote does not occurs. fact13: If that cliquishness does not happens then both this non-liberalness and the backed occurs. fact14: The enfeeblement and that bullying perleche occurs. fact15: This thriving occurs. fact16: The equilibrizing Blastocladia does not occurs. fact17: If this thriving happens and that tapering happens then that snorkeling does not occurs. fact18: The spiriting battalion and the samsara occurs. fact19: That tactualness does not occurs. fact20: The fact that that stealing savor happens is true. fact21: If that tapering does not occurs that snorkeling and this thriving happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That snorkeling happens. ; $proof$ =

fact15 & fact9 -> int1: This thriving and that tapering happens.; int1 & fact17 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This impoliticness occurs and that advertising tempered happens.

({A} & {B})

fact1: This undercoated and the sustaining Bittacidae happens. fact2: This cartoon happens. fact3: This telephonicness occurs and this impoliticness happens if that rising does not occurs. fact4: If that advertising tempered does not occurs then the Europocentricness occurs and this impoliticness happens. fact5: This catachresticness happens. fact6: That advertising tempered happens. fact7: The fact that both this impoliticness and that advertising tempered happens is wrong if that headlining transitivity does not happens. fact8: The angered occurs. fact9: That reunion happens. fact10: This impoliticness happens. fact11: That apotheosizing doh happens. fact12: If that that rising does not happens but that headlining transitivity happens is wrong then that headlining transitivity does not occurs. fact13: Both this sabotaging and that quartering Entolomataceae happens. fact14: That advertising tempered does not happens and that headlining transitivity does not happens if that muscling pharyngitis occurs. fact15: That this publishableness does not occurs causes that both that muscling pharyngitis and that rising occurs. fact16: If that non-tenderness and that migratoriness happens then this publishableness does not happens. fact17: Both the symptomaticness and the tintinnabulation happens. fact18: That photographicness and the allomerism happens. fact19: Both the pat and that colouration occurs. fact20: Both this armillariness and the antibiotic occurs. fact21: Both that non-tenderness and that migratoriness occurs if that euphemizing happens.

fact1: ({IT} & {O}) fact2: {CF} fact3: ¬{E} -> ({HO} & {A}) fact4: ¬{B} -> ({JI} & {A}) fact5: {CU} fact6: {B} fact7: ¬{C} -> ¬({A} & {B}) fact8: {AH} fact9: {GO} fact10: {A} fact11: {FE} fact12: ¬(¬{E} & {C}) -> ¬{C} fact13: ({GQ} & {AK}) fact14: {D} -> (¬{B} & ¬{C}) fact15: ¬{F} -> ({D} & {E}) fact16: (¬{G} & {H}) -> ¬{F} fact17: ({U} & {DT}) fact18: ({BO} & {FA}) fact19: ({BP} & {FU}) fact20: ({AP} & {IQ}) fact21: {I} -> (¬{G} & {H})

The Europocentricness happens.

{JI}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This undercoated and the sustaining Bittacidae happens. fact2: This cartoon happens. fact3: This telephonicness occurs and this impoliticness happens if that rising does not occurs. fact4: If that advertising tempered does not occurs then the Europocentricness occurs and this impoliticness happens. fact5: This catachresticness happens. fact6: That advertising tempered happens. fact7: The fact that both this impoliticness and that advertising tempered happens is wrong if that headlining transitivity does not happens. fact8: The angered occurs. fact9: That reunion happens. fact10: This impoliticness happens. fact11: That apotheosizing doh happens. fact12: If that that rising does not happens but that headlining transitivity happens is wrong then that headlining transitivity does not occurs. fact13: Both this sabotaging and that quartering Entolomataceae happens. fact14: That advertising tempered does not happens and that headlining transitivity does not happens if that muscling pharyngitis occurs. fact15: That this publishableness does not occurs causes that both that muscling pharyngitis and that rising occurs. fact16: If that non-tenderness and that migratoriness happens then this publishableness does not happens. fact17: Both the symptomaticness and the tintinnabulation happens. fact18: That photographicness and the allomerism happens. fact19: Both the pat and that colouration occurs. fact20: Both this armillariness and the antibiotic occurs. fact21: Both that non-tenderness and that migratoriness occurs if that euphemizing happens. ; $hypothesis$ = This impoliticness occurs and that advertising tempered happens. ; $proof$ =

fact10 & fact6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That stria is caesarean.

{B}{b}

fact1: That cambium is not burrlike or it broadens or both. fact2: That stria is not caesarean if that cambium broadens.

fact1: (¬{AA}{a} v {AB}{a}) fact2: {AB}{a} -> ¬{B}{b}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That cambium is not burrlike or it broadens or both. fact2: That stria is not caesarean if that cambium broadens. ; $hypothesis$ = That stria is caesarean. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

The fact that this Gallus is a Ferrara does not hold.

¬{C}{b}

fact1: This homemaker is unconstricted and does not rid SD. fact2: The fact that this homemaker is a curie but not a Spartium is not correct. fact3: This homemaker is a kind of a Timbuktu if the fact that this homemaker is a curie but this one is not a kind of a Spartium does not hold. fact4: If this homemaker yields and is a Timbuktu then this Gallus is not a Ferrara. fact5: If this homemaker is not constricted and does not rid SD then this homemaker yields.

fact1: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact2: ¬({D}{a} & ¬{E}{a}) fact3: ¬({D}{a} & ¬{E}{a}) -> {A}{a} fact4: ({B}{a} & {A}{a}) -> ¬{C}{b} fact5: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{a}

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: This homemaker is unconstricted and does not rid SD. fact2: The fact that this homemaker is a curie but not a Spartium is not correct. fact3: This homemaker is a kind of a Timbuktu if the fact that this homemaker is a curie but this one is not a kind of a Spartium does not hold. fact4: If this homemaker yields and is a Timbuktu then this Gallus is not a Ferrara. fact5: If this homemaker is not constricted and does not rid SD then this homemaker yields. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that this Gallus is a Ferrara does not hold. ; $proof$ =

fact5 & fact1 -> int1: This homemaker yields.; fact3 & fact2 -> int2: This homemaker is a Timbuktu.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This homemaker yields and that is a Timbuktu.; int3 & fact4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__