Datasets:

hitachi-nlp

/

FLD.v2.reimpl

like 0

0.3

This raja does not silence.

¬{A}{b}

fact1: This housefly does not nauseate Rothko if the fact that this thing is a Equisetum and/or an unconsciousness does not hold. fact2: If that this housefly is a Equisetum and/or is not an unconsciousness does not hold this housefly does not nauseate Rothko. fact3: The Dragunov does not silence. fact4: If this housefly does not asphyxiate and does not nauseate Rothko then this raja does not silence. fact5: This raja silences if this housefly does not nauseate Rothko. fact6: The fact that this housefly is a Equisetum or that is not a kind of an unconsciousness or both is incorrect. fact7: If something does not bungle funniness then it does not asphyxiate and does not nauseate Rothko.

fact1: ¬({AA}{a} v {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact2: ¬({AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact3: ¬{A}{er} fact4: (¬{C}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> ¬{A}{b} fact5: ¬{B}{a} -> {A}{b} fact6: ¬({AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) fact7: (x): ¬{D}x -> (¬{C}x & ¬{B}x)

This raja does not silence.

¬{A}{b}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This housefly does not nauseate Rothko if the fact that this thing is a Equisetum and/or an unconsciousness does not hold. fact2: If that this housefly is a Equisetum and/or is not an unconsciousness does not hold this housefly does not nauseate Rothko. fact3: The Dragunov does not silence. fact4: If this housefly does not asphyxiate and does not nauseate Rothko then this raja does not silence. fact5: This raja silences if this housefly does not nauseate Rothko. fact6: The fact that this housefly is a Equisetum or that is not a kind of an unconsciousness or both is incorrect. fact7: If something does not bungle funniness then it does not asphyxiate and does not nauseate Rothko. ; $hypothesis$ = This raja does not silence. ; $proof$ =

fact2 & fact6 -> int1: This housefly does not nauseate Rothko.; int1 & fact5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That noisemaker is a fraternity if that noisemaker is not a dishonor.

¬{B}{aa} -> {C}{aa}

fact1: Something is a fraternity if it is not a dishonor.

fact1: (x): ¬{B}x -> {C}x

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: Something is a fraternity if it is not a dishonor. ; $hypothesis$ = That noisemaker is a fraternity if that noisemaker is not a dishonor. ; $proof$ =

fact1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That ataractic is not unemotional.

¬{AB}{a}

fact1: That ataractic jests. fact2: If that ataractic is dermal it is thankless. fact3: The limonite does jest but it is not a bionics. fact4: That ataractic is a conformism but it is emotional if it does jest. fact5: The fact that that medium is a kind of unemotional thing that does not dictate solicitousness hold.

fact1: {A}{a} fact2: {HS}{a} -> {FI}{a} fact3: ({A}{ad} & ¬{GR}{ad}) fact4: {A}{a} -> ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact5: ({AB}{gt} & ¬{FP}{gt})

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: That ataractic jests. fact2: If that ataractic is dermal it is thankless. fact3: The limonite does jest but it is not a bionics. fact4: That ataractic is a conformism but it is emotional if it does jest. fact5: The fact that that medium is a kind of unemotional thing that does not dictate solicitousness hold. ; $hypothesis$ = That ataractic is not unemotional. ; $proof$ =

fact4 & fact1 -> int1: That ataractic is a conformism but that is emotional.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That eolith is a kind of a villeinage.

{B}{a}

fact1: If some man is not doctoral the fact that the fact that this one is a rioting and this one does not whisper Ulanova is right does not hold. fact2: That that eolith is not a palaeoecology but it Doctors schtickl does not hold. fact3: If that eolith does not pray Lamiaceae that riata is both a villeinage and untheatrical. fact4: If some person is theatrical the fact that this one prays Lamiaceae and this one is not a kind of a villeinage does not hold. fact5: If that Mavik does not whisper Ulanova then that that Mavik is a kind of a rioting or it is not doctoral or both is wrong. fact6: If that eolith is a palaeoecology then that eolith is a villeinage. fact7: The apex is a villeinage. fact8: If this hyperhidrosis is not a rioting then that this hyperhidrosis is contractual and is untheatrical is wrong. fact9: This hyperhidrosis is not a kind of a rioting if the fact that that Mavik is a rioting and/or it is non-doctoral does not hold. fact10: That this hyperhidrosis sheds and is polymeric is wrong. fact11: If there is something such that that this is a rioting and this does not whisper Ulanova does not hold then this marginalisation is not a kind of a rioting. fact12: If that that eolith is not a palaeoecology but that one does Doctor schtickl does not hold then that eolith is a villeinage. fact13: If the fact that that eolith is not a Alcea but artiodactylous is wrong it is a NSU. fact14: If the fact that something sheds and is polymeric is not true then that does not whisper Ulanova. fact15: If that someone sheds and is polymeric is incorrect then he/she is non-doctoral. fact16: That that eolith is a palaeoecology that Doctors schtickl does not hold. fact17: If the fact that this marginalisation prays Lamiaceae but it is not a villeinage does not hold then that eolith is not a villeinage. fact18: Something is contractual or this does pray Lamiaceae or both if this is not a rioting.

fact1: (x): ¬{G}x -> ¬({D}x & ¬{F}x) fact2: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact3: ¬{C}{a} -> ({B}{ch} & {A}{ch}) fact4: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({C}x & ¬{B}x) fact5: ¬{F}{d} -> ¬({D}{d} v ¬{G}{d}) fact6: {AA}{a} -> {B}{a} fact7: {B}{bs} fact8: ¬{D}{c} -> ¬({E}{c} & {A}{c}) fact9: ¬({D}{d} v ¬{G}{d}) -> ¬{D}{c} fact10: ¬({H}{c} & {I}{c}) fact11: (x): ¬({D}x & ¬{F}x) -> ¬{D}{b} fact12: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} fact13: ¬(¬{BN}{a} & {CM}{a}) -> {S}{a} fact14: (x): ¬({H}x & {I}x) -> ¬{F}x fact15: (x): ¬({H}x & {I}x) -> ¬{G}x fact16: ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact17: ¬({C}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact18: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({E}x v {C}x)

That riata is a kind of a villeinage.

{B}{ch}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If some man is not doctoral the fact that the fact that this one is a rioting and this one does not whisper Ulanova is right does not hold. fact2: That that eolith is not a palaeoecology but it Doctors schtickl does not hold. fact3: If that eolith does not pray Lamiaceae that riata is both a villeinage and untheatrical. fact4: If some person is theatrical the fact that this one prays Lamiaceae and this one is not a kind of a villeinage does not hold. fact5: If that Mavik does not whisper Ulanova then that that Mavik is a kind of a rioting or it is not doctoral or both is wrong. fact6: If that eolith is a palaeoecology then that eolith is a villeinage. fact7: The apex is a villeinage. fact8: If this hyperhidrosis is not a rioting then that this hyperhidrosis is contractual and is untheatrical is wrong. fact9: This hyperhidrosis is not a kind of a rioting if the fact that that Mavik is a rioting and/or it is non-doctoral does not hold. fact10: That this hyperhidrosis sheds and is polymeric is wrong. fact11: If there is something such that that this is a rioting and this does not whisper Ulanova does not hold then this marginalisation is not a kind of a rioting. fact12: If that that eolith is not a palaeoecology but that one does Doctor schtickl does not hold then that eolith is a villeinage. fact13: If the fact that that eolith is not a Alcea but artiodactylous is wrong it is a NSU. fact14: If the fact that something sheds and is polymeric is not true then that does not whisper Ulanova. fact15: If that someone sheds and is polymeric is incorrect then he/she is non-doctoral. fact16: That that eolith is a palaeoecology that Doctors schtickl does not hold. fact17: If the fact that this marginalisation prays Lamiaceae but it is not a villeinage does not hold then that eolith is not a villeinage. fact18: Something is contractual or this does pray Lamiaceae or both if this is not a rioting. ; $hypothesis$ = That eolith is a kind of a villeinage. ; $proof$ =

fact12 & fact2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

Miguel Angel is gregarious or does not famish Millikan or both.

({C}{c} v ¬{B}{c})

fact1: This evaluator is not a doubled if either that immunogen does vaccinate gabble or that thing is a Sechuana or both. fact2: Miguel Angel is gregarious or that thing famishes Millikan or both if that that immunogen famishes Millikan is correct. fact3: That room does vaccinate gabble if that that peasant is a setting is not incorrect. fact4: This evaluator is a Tabuk. fact5: If that room vaccinates gabble that immunogen vaccinates gabble. fact6: Miguel Angel is a Tabuk if this evaluator famishes Millikan. fact7: The fact that something is a Tabuk and it is biennial is wrong if it is not a kind of a Ivanov. fact8: Something is not a Ivanov if the thing is not a doubled. fact9: That immunogen is a Tabuk and that famishes Millikan if the fact that this evaluator is not gregarious is correct. fact10: If this evaluator is a kind of a Tabuk that immunogen famishes Millikan. fact11: Something is a Dalbergia if the thing is a kind of a union. fact12: That Miguel Angel is a kind of a ring is not false. fact13: Miguel Angel is gregarious or famishes Millikan or both. fact14: This soil is a Petauristidae if this sunglasses does Mull Marchantia and is not a kind of a Petauristidae. fact15: Miguel Angel is gregarious or that does not famish Millikan or both if that immunogen famish Millikan. fact16: If this soil is a kind of a Petauristidae then the fact that this merlin skims Maputo and is not a union does not hold. fact17: This sunglasses does Mull Marchantia and is not a Petauristidae if that thing is a kind of a narrative. fact18: Some man is a setting if it is a kind of a Dalbergia. fact19: Someone is not a kind of a Tabuk if that she/he is a Tabuk and not non-biennial is incorrect. fact20: The fact that that peasant is a kind of a union is not false if the fact that this merlin skims Maputo but this is not a union does not hold. fact21: If the monk is not a kind of a Fallopius and is a Tribonemaceae this sunglasses is a kind of a narrative. fact22: That immunogen is a kind of a Tabuk. fact23: If this evaluator is not a kind of a Tabuk that Miguel Angel is gregarious and/or it does not famish Millikan is wrong.

fact1: ({G}{b} v {H}{b}) -> ¬{F}{a} fact2: {B}{b} -> ({C}{c} v {B}{c}) fact3: {I}{e} -> {G}{d} fact4: {A}{a} fact5: {G}{d} -> {G}{b} fact6: {B}{a} -> {A}{c} fact7: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬({A}x & {E}x) fact8: (x): ¬{F}x -> ¬{D}x fact9: ¬{C}{a} -> ({A}{b} & {B}{b}) fact10: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} fact11: (x): {K}x -> {J}x fact12: {JI}{c} fact13: ({C}{c} v {B}{c}) fact14: ({N}{h} & ¬{M}{h}) -> {M}{g} fact15: {B}{b} -> ({C}{c} v ¬{B}{c}) fact16: {M}{g} -> ¬({L}{f} & ¬{K}{f}) fact17: {O}{h} -> ({N}{h} & ¬{M}{h}) fact18: (x): {J}x -> {I}x fact19: (x): ¬({A}x & {E}x) -> ¬{A}x fact20: ¬({L}{f} & ¬{K}{f}) -> {K}{e} fact21: (¬{P}{i} & {Q}{i}) -> {O}{h} fact22: {A}{b} fact23: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({C}{c} v ¬{B}{c})

That Miguel Angel is gregarious or it does not famish Millikan or both is incorrect.

¬({C}{c} v ¬{B}{c})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This evaluator is not a doubled if either that immunogen does vaccinate gabble or that thing is a Sechuana or both. fact2: Miguel Angel is gregarious or that thing famishes Millikan or both if that that immunogen famishes Millikan is correct. fact3: That room does vaccinate gabble if that that peasant is a setting is not incorrect. fact4: This evaluator is a Tabuk. fact5: If that room vaccinates gabble that immunogen vaccinates gabble. fact6: Miguel Angel is a Tabuk if this evaluator famishes Millikan. fact7: The fact that something is a Tabuk and it is biennial is wrong if it is not a kind of a Ivanov. fact8: Something is not a Ivanov if the thing is not a doubled. fact9: That immunogen is a Tabuk and that famishes Millikan if the fact that this evaluator is not gregarious is correct. fact10: If this evaluator is a kind of a Tabuk that immunogen famishes Millikan. fact11: Something is a Dalbergia if the thing is a kind of a union. fact12: That Miguel Angel is a kind of a ring is not false. fact13: Miguel Angel is gregarious or famishes Millikan or both. fact14: This soil is a Petauristidae if this sunglasses does Mull Marchantia and is not a kind of a Petauristidae. fact15: Miguel Angel is gregarious or that does not famish Millikan or both if that immunogen famish Millikan. fact16: If this soil is a kind of a Petauristidae then the fact that this merlin skims Maputo and is not a union does not hold. fact17: This sunglasses does Mull Marchantia and is not a Petauristidae if that thing is a kind of a narrative. fact18: Some man is a setting if it is a kind of a Dalbergia. fact19: Someone is not a kind of a Tabuk if that she/he is a Tabuk and not non-biennial is incorrect. fact20: The fact that that peasant is a kind of a union is not false if the fact that this merlin skims Maputo but this is not a union does not hold. fact21: If the monk is not a kind of a Fallopius and is a Tribonemaceae this sunglasses is a kind of a narrative. fact22: That immunogen is a kind of a Tabuk. fact23: If this evaluator is not a kind of a Tabuk that Miguel Angel is gregarious and/or it does not famish Millikan is wrong. ; $hypothesis$ = Miguel Angel is gregarious or does not famish Millikan or both. ; $proof$ =

fact10 & fact4 -> int1: That immunogen famishes Millikan.; int1 & fact15 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That woodhewer is not a Aranea and that thing is not a kind of a Bourgogne.

(¬{D}{c} & ¬{B}{c})

fact1: The fact that Denis does not antisepticize Diaghilev hold. fact2: If Denis does not antisepticize Diaghilev it films friability. fact3: That that woodhewer is not a kind of a Aranea and is not a Bourgogne is incorrect if Denis antisepticizes Diaghilev. fact4: That woodhewer is a kind of a Gambusia that does not beaked flourishing. fact5: That woodhewer does not film friability if Denis is a Bourgogne but it is not a Aranea. fact6: This countinghouse does not purpurate and it is not a pediatrics. fact7: The lithomancer films friability but it is not a reinsurance. fact8: That that biprism does not antisepticize Diaghilev is not false if Denis antisepticize Diaghilev but this is not a kind of a Bourgogne. fact9: That woodhewer is not a Bourgogne if this calamus is not a kind of a Bourgogne. fact10: That woodhewer does not antisepticize Diaghilev if Denis is not a Bourgogne. fact11: That woodhewer is not a Bourgogne. fact12: If this calamus is not a Bourgogne then that woodhewer is not a Aranea and is not a Bourgogne. fact13: Denis antisepticizes Diaghilev but it is not foetal if this calamus is active. fact14: That woodhewer does not beaked flourishing and that is not a kind of a Bourgogne. fact15: Denis films friability. fact16: If some man is foetal the fact that it antisepticizes Diaghilev and it is not a kind of a Bourgogne hold. fact17: If that somebody explodes Kiribati hold that the person is not inactive hold. fact18: If Denis does not film friability then that woodhewer is not a Aranea and she/he does not film friability. fact19: the fact that this Diaghilev does not antisepticize Denis hold. fact20: That woodhewer is not a Bourgogne and it does not antisepticize Diaghilev. fact21: That something is not a Aranea and it is not a Bourgogne is wrong if it does antisepticize Diaghilev. fact22: That woodhewer is not a Bourgogne and she/he does not film friability. fact23: Denis is not a Aranea. fact24: If Denis films friability and does not beaked flourishing this calamus is not a kind of a Bourgogne. fact25: If Denis does not antisepticize Diaghilev then it films friability and it does not beaked flourishing.

fact1: ¬{A}{a} fact2: ¬{A}{a} -> {AA}{a} fact3: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{D}{c} & ¬{B}{c}) fact4: ({EN}{c} & ¬{AB}{c}) fact5: ({B}{a} & ¬{D}{a}) -> ¬{AA}{c} fact6: (¬{JH}{ic} & ¬{DK}{ic}) fact7: ({AA}{gf} & ¬{BM}{gf}) fact8: ({A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> ¬{A}{em} fact9: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬{B}{c} fact10: ¬{B}{a} -> ¬{A}{c} fact11: ¬{B}{c} fact12: ¬{B}{b} -> (¬{D}{c} & ¬{B}{c}) fact13: {E}{b} -> ({A}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) fact14: (¬{AB}{c} & ¬{B}{c}) fact15: {AA}{a} fact16: (x): {C}x -> ({A}x & ¬{B}x) fact17: (x): {F}x -> {E}x fact18: ¬{AA}{a} -> (¬{D}{c} & ¬{AA}{c}) fact19: ¬{AC}{aa} fact20: (¬{B}{c} & ¬{A}{c}) fact21: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{D}x & ¬{B}x) fact22: (¬{B}{c} & ¬{AA}{c}) fact23: ¬{D}{a} fact24: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact25: ¬{A}{a} -> ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a})

That biprism does not scatter and is not a kind of a Aranea.

(¬{FG}{em} & ¬{D}{em})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that Denis does not antisepticize Diaghilev hold. fact2: If Denis does not antisepticize Diaghilev it films friability. fact3: That that woodhewer is not a kind of a Aranea and is not a Bourgogne is incorrect if Denis antisepticizes Diaghilev. fact4: That woodhewer is a kind of a Gambusia that does not beaked flourishing. fact5: That woodhewer does not film friability if Denis is a Bourgogne but it is not a Aranea. fact6: This countinghouse does not purpurate and it is not a pediatrics. fact7: The lithomancer films friability but it is not a reinsurance. fact8: That that biprism does not antisepticize Diaghilev is not false if Denis antisepticize Diaghilev but this is not a kind of a Bourgogne. fact9: That woodhewer is not a Bourgogne if this calamus is not a kind of a Bourgogne. fact10: That woodhewer does not antisepticize Diaghilev if Denis is not a Bourgogne. fact11: That woodhewer is not a Bourgogne. fact12: If this calamus is not a Bourgogne then that woodhewer is not a Aranea and is not a Bourgogne. fact13: Denis antisepticizes Diaghilev but it is not foetal if this calamus is active. fact14: That woodhewer does not beaked flourishing and that is not a kind of a Bourgogne. fact15: Denis films friability. fact16: If some man is foetal the fact that it antisepticizes Diaghilev and it is not a kind of a Bourgogne hold. fact17: If that somebody explodes Kiribati hold that the person is not inactive hold. fact18: If Denis does not film friability then that woodhewer is not a Aranea and she/he does not film friability. fact19: the fact that this Diaghilev does not antisepticize Denis hold. fact20: That woodhewer is not a Bourgogne and it does not antisepticize Diaghilev. fact21: That something is not a Aranea and it is not a Bourgogne is wrong if it does antisepticize Diaghilev. fact22: That woodhewer is not a Bourgogne and she/he does not film friability. fact23: Denis is not a Aranea. fact24: If Denis films friability and does not beaked flourishing this calamus is not a kind of a Bourgogne. fact25: If Denis does not antisepticize Diaghilev then it films friability and it does not beaked flourishing. ; $hypothesis$ = That woodhewer is not a Aranea and that thing is not a kind of a Bourgogne. ; $proof$ =

fact25 & fact1 -> int1: Denis films friability but it does not beaked flourishing.; int1 & fact24 -> int2: This calamus is not a Bourgogne.; int2 & fact12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That there is nothing that is non-humic thing that does comment Seseli is false.

¬((x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x))

fact1: There is no man such that it is not optical and is a kind of a lede. fact2: There is nothing such that it is not unangry and grills realpolitik. fact3: There exists no one that does not spiritualize angiohemophilia and is bronchial. fact4: There exists no man such that it is non-bigger a injuriousness. fact5: There is nobody such that the one does not sink untruthfulness and proffers. fact6: There exists nothing such that this thing is not humic and this thing comments Seseli. fact7: There exists no man that is humic and comments Seseli. fact8: There is nothing such that it does not asphyxiate Concepcion and it settlingses Shavuoth. fact9: There is nothing that is not a kind of a Aramaic and is a kind of a Plesiosauria. fact10: There exists no one such that it does not prune sympathy and belittles.

fact1: (x): ¬(¬{J}x & {AK}x) fact2: (x): ¬(¬{AH}x & {CN}x) fact3: (x): ¬(¬{FK}x & {CL}x) fact4: (x): ¬(¬{AJ}x & {DK}x) fact5: (x): ¬(¬{BL}x & {IL}x) fact6: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) fact7: (x): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) fact8: (x): ¬(¬{FJ}x & {GC}x) fact9: (x): ¬(¬{FT}x & {JF}x) fact10: (x): ¬(¬{A}x & {IS}x)

DISPROVED

DISPROVED

$facts$ = fact1: There is no man such that it is not optical and is a kind of a lede. fact2: There is nothing such that it is not unangry and grills realpolitik. fact3: There exists no one that does not spiritualize angiohemophilia and is bronchial. fact4: There exists no man such that it is non-bigger a injuriousness. fact5: There is nobody such that the one does not sink untruthfulness and proffers. fact6: There exists nothing such that this thing is not humic and this thing comments Seseli. fact7: There exists no man that is humic and comments Seseli. fact8: There is nothing such that it does not asphyxiate Concepcion and it settlingses Shavuoth. fact9: There is nothing that is not a kind of a Aramaic and is a kind of a Plesiosauria. fact10: There exists no one such that it does not prune sympathy and belittles. ; $hypothesis$ = That there is nothing that is non-humic thing that does comment Seseli is false. ; $proof$ =

fact6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This synovium does razz.

{D}{a}

fact1: If the fact that something proof reads hold then it does razz. fact2: This desensitization is not a gripping if this desensitization is a pastness. fact3: This desensitization is a pastness. fact4: If that foreleg is a Bennett the fact that that tonsil is indiscriminate and a boast is false. fact5: That that cellarage is not exterritorial and she/he does not proofread hold if this cod is not a ruddiness. fact6: This synovium yaps Barbary. fact7: This synovium states Mishnah and yaps Barbary. fact8: That foreleg disarrays kilovolt. fact9: If something is both not a Sikorsky and not australopithecine that it is not a fervidness is true. fact10: If something is not a gripping that thing is not australopithecine and is a Nothofagus. fact11: That familiar does not yap Barbary if that cellarage is not exterritorial and the thing does not proofread. fact12: This cod is not a ruddiness if that this sachet litters variableness and/or is a ruddiness is incorrect. fact13: This desensitization is not a kind of a Sikorsky if that that tonsil is a kind of non-discriminate thing that is a kind of a boast is false. fact14: If that foreleg does disarray kilovolt it is a kind of a Bennett. fact15: This synovium razzes or the thing does state Mishnah or both if that familiar does not yap Barbary.

fact1: (x): {C}x -> {D}x fact2: {Q}{f} -> ¬{N}{f} fact3: {Q}{f} fact4: {O}{h} -> ¬(¬{K}{g} & {L}{g}) fact5: ¬{F}{d} -> (¬{E}{c} & ¬{C}{c}) fact6: {B}{a} fact7: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact8: {P}{h} fact9: (x): (¬{I}x & ¬{J}x) -> ¬{G}x fact10: (x): ¬{N}x -> (¬{J}x & {M}x) fact11: (¬{E}{c} & ¬{C}{c}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact12: ¬({H}{e} v {F}{e}) -> ¬{F}{d} fact13: ¬(¬{K}{g} & {L}{g}) -> ¬{I}{f} fact14: {P}{h} -> {O}{h} fact15: ¬{B}{b} -> ({D}{a} v {A}{a})

That I razzes.

{D}{do}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If the fact that something proof reads hold then it does razz. fact2: This desensitization is not a gripping if this desensitization is a pastness. fact3: This desensitization is a pastness. fact4: If that foreleg is a Bennett the fact that that tonsil is indiscriminate and a boast is false. fact5: That that cellarage is not exterritorial and she/he does not proofread hold if this cod is not a ruddiness. fact6: This synovium yaps Barbary. fact7: This synovium states Mishnah and yaps Barbary. fact8: That foreleg disarrays kilovolt. fact9: If something is both not a Sikorsky and not australopithecine that it is not a fervidness is true. fact10: If something is not a gripping that thing is not australopithecine and is a Nothofagus. fact11: That familiar does not yap Barbary if that cellarage is not exterritorial and the thing does not proofread. fact12: This cod is not a ruddiness if that this sachet litters variableness and/or is a ruddiness is incorrect. fact13: This desensitization is not a kind of a Sikorsky if that that tonsil is a kind of non-discriminate thing that is a kind of a boast is false. fact14: If that foreleg does disarray kilovolt it is a kind of a Bennett. fact15: This synovium razzes or the thing does state Mishnah or both if that familiar does not yap Barbary. ; $hypothesis$ = This synovium does razz. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

Let's assume that that IgM is not a shearing and not phyletic.

(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a})

fact1: If that IgM is not a shearing and it is not phyletic then that IgM is unscheduled. fact2: Something that either is not a kind of a shearing or is unscheduled or both is not a shearing. fact3: That IgM is not phyletic if this bullfighter is not myeloid but it is not non-Rosicrucian. fact4: If this hydrofoil does not embellish blackness the fact that that Portuguese is not a Freudian and it does not colly unlawfulness does not hold. fact5: If that IgM is a kind of a shearing that is non-phyletic then that IgM is unscheduled. fact6: Something is not myeloid but it is Rosicrucian if it is not catkinate. fact7: This saver does not aggregate Maimonides. fact8: The fact that that IgM is not Rosicrucian or not a shearing or both is false if this bullfighter is unscheduled. fact9: If something is not amoebous then it kips Arctocebus and is bloodless. fact10: Either that IgM is not a shearing or it is unscheduled or both. fact11: If there exists some man such that it kips Arctocebus and is bloodless then this bullfighter does not kips Arctocebus. fact12: That that IgM is not alvine is correct. fact13: That some man is not myeloid and it is not catkinate does not hold if it does not kip Arctocebus. fact14: Something is not amoebous if that this thing is not a kind of a Freudian and does not colly unlawfulness is wrong. fact15: That that IgM is both a shearing and not phyletic does not hold. fact16: If that IgM is Rosicrucian then it is not unscheduled. fact17: That IgM is not a shearing. fact18: If that the fact that this saver does not embellish blackness and does not ban Labrador does not hold hold then this hydrofoil does not embellish blackness. fact19: The fact that this saver does not embellish blackness and does not ban Labrador is not true if the person does not aggregate Maimonides. fact20: If that that IgM is either not Rosicrucian or not a shearing or both does not hold then the soma is a shearing.

fact1: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} fact2: (x): (¬{AA}x v {B}x) -> ¬{AA}x fact3: (¬{C}{b} & {A}{b}) -> ¬{AB}{a} fact4: ¬{J}{d} -> ¬(¬{I}{c} & ¬{H}{c}) fact5: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} fact6: (x): ¬{D}x -> (¬{C}x & {A}x) fact7: ¬{L}{e} fact8: {B}{b} -> ¬(¬{A}{a} v ¬{AA}{a}) fact9: (x): ¬{G}x -> ({E}x & {F}x) fact10: (¬{AA}{a} v {B}{a}) fact11: (x): ({E}x & {F}x) -> ¬{E}{b} fact12: ¬{HH}{a} fact13: (x): ¬{E}x -> ¬(¬{C}x & ¬{D}x) fact14: (x): ¬(¬{I}x & ¬{H}x) -> ¬{G}x fact15: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact16: {A}{a} -> ¬{B}{a} fact17: ¬{AA}{a} fact18: ¬(¬{J}{e} & ¬{K}{e}) -> ¬{J}{d} fact19: ¬{L}{e} -> ¬(¬{J}{e} & ¬{K}{e}) fact20: ¬(¬{A}{a} v ¬{AA}{a}) -> {AA}{jc}

The soma is a shearing.

{AA}{jc}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that IgM is not a shearing and it is not phyletic then that IgM is unscheduled. fact2: Something that either is not a kind of a shearing or is unscheduled or both is not a shearing. fact3: That IgM is not phyletic if this bullfighter is not myeloid but it is not non-Rosicrucian. fact4: If this hydrofoil does not embellish blackness the fact that that Portuguese is not a Freudian and it does not colly unlawfulness does not hold. fact5: If that IgM is a kind of a shearing that is non-phyletic then that IgM is unscheduled. fact6: Something is not myeloid but it is Rosicrucian if it is not catkinate. fact7: This saver does not aggregate Maimonides. fact8: The fact that that IgM is not Rosicrucian or not a shearing or both is false if this bullfighter is unscheduled. fact9: If something is not amoebous then it kips Arctocebus and is bloodless. fact10: Either that IgM is not a shearing or it is unscheduled or both. fact11: If there exists some man such that it kips Arctocebus and is bloodless then this bullfighter does not kips Arctocebus. fact12: That that IgM is not alvine is correct. fact13: That some man is not myeloid and it is not catkinate does not hold if it does not kip Arctocebus. fact14: Something is not amoebous if that this thing is not a kind of a Freudian and does not colly unlawfulness is wrong. fact15: That that IgM is both a shearing and not phyletic does not hold. fact16: If that IgM is Rosicrucian then it is not unscheduled. fact17: That IgM is not a shearing. fact18: If that the fact that this saver does not embellish blackness and does not ban Labrador does not hold hold then this hydrofoil does not embellish blackness. fact19: The fact that this saver does not embellish blackness and does not ban Labrador is not true if the person does not aggregate Maimonides. fact20: If that that IgM is either not Rosicrucian or not a shearing or both does not hold then the soma is a shearing. ; $hypothesis$ = Let's assume that that IgM is not a shearing and not phyletic. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That baroness drips.

{B}{a}

fact1: If someone is noncritical then that baroness drips and grooms. fact2: If there is someone such that the one is noncritical the fact that that baroness does groom is correct. fact3: That baroness does groom.

fact1: (x): {A}x -> ({B}{a} & {C}{a}) fact2: (x): {A}x -> {C}{a} fact3: {C}{a}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If someone is noncritical then that baroness drips and grooms. fact2: If there is someone such that the one is noncritical the fact that that baroness does groom is correct. fact3: That baroness does groom. ; $hypothesis$ = That baroness drips. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

There exists some person such that if this person is not a kind of a quintupling this person is a jugular and this person is not a kind of a fast.

(Ex): ¬{A}x -> ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x)

fact1: If that abele is not a kind of a quintupling it is a kind of a jugular that is not a kind of a fast.

fact1: ¬{A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa})

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: If that abele is not a kind of a quintupling it is a kind of a jugular that is not a kind of a fast. ; $hypothesis$ = There exists some person such that if this person is not a kind of a quintupling this person is a jugular and this person is not a kind of a fast. ; $proof$ =

fact1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That this non-uncooperativeness and this non-volumetricalness happens is incorrect.

¬(¬{B} & ¬{A})

fact1: If notthe CMBR but the victimisation occurs then the surcease does not occurs. fact2: If notthis requiring Eridanus but that dedication happens then this volumetricalness does not occurs. fact3: This requiring Eridanus does not happens but that dedication happens. fact4: Both this non-skeletalness and that pervaporation happens. fact5: That dedication does not occurs if that this requiring Eridanus does not happens and that disorderliness does not happens is wrong. fact6: If that dedication does not happens that both this cooperativeness and this non-volumetricalness occurs is wrong. fact7: That pervaporation occurs. fact8: That this volumetricalness does not happens is caused by that this requiring Eridanus happens and that dedication occurs. fact9: This requiring Eridanus does not happens. fact10: That this uncooperativeness occurs is prevented by that this non-skeletalness and that pervaporation happens.

fact1: (¬{DJ} & {BD}) -> ¬{IR} fact2: (¬{D} & {C}) -> ¬{A} fact3: (¬{D} & {C}) fact4: (¬{AA} & {AB}) fact5: ¬(¬{D} & ¬{E}) -> ¬{C} fact6: ¬{C} -> ¬(¬{B} & ¬{A}) fact7: {AB} fact8: ({D} & {C}) -> ¬{A} fact9: ¬{D} fact10: (¬{AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B}

That this non-uncooperativeness and this non-volumetricalness happens is incorrect.

¬(¬{B} & ¬{A})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If notthe CMBR but the victimisation occurs then the surcease does not occurs. fact2: If notthis requiring Eridanus but that dedication happens then this volumetricalness does not occurs. fact3: This requiring Eridanus does not happens but that dedication happens. fact4: Both this non-skeletalness and that pervaporation happens. fact5: That dedication does not occurs if that this requiring Eridanus does not happens and that disorderliness does not happens is wrong. fact6: If that dedication does not happens that both this cooperativeness and this non-volumetricalness occurs is wrong. fact7: That pervaporation occurs. fact8: That this volumetricalness does not happens is caused by that this requiring Eridanus happens and that dedication occurs. fact9: This requiring Eridanus does not happens. fact10: That this uncooperativeness occurs is prevented by that this non-skeletalness and that pervaporation happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That this non-uncooperativeness and this non-volumetricalness happens is incorrect. ; $proof$ =

fact10 & fact4 -> int1: This uncooperativeness does not occurs.; fact2 & fact3 -> int2: This volumetricalness does not happens.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This phrenologist is not principled and the thing is not a pontificate.

(¬{C}{c} & ¬{D}{c})

fact1: That corm is not a seventies. fact2: If this GAD is not a spoiling then that this phrenologist is not principled but he/she is a pontificate does not hold. fact3: That corm proceeds but this is not a seventies if the fact that that corm is not frontal hold. fact4: That corm is not a seventies if that corm is not frontal. fact5: If this GAD is not a kind of a spoiling that this phrenologist is not principled and that is not a pontificate is incorrect. fact6: That this phrenologist is not principled and is a pontificate does not hold. fact7: The fact that this phrenologist is not a kind of a spoiling is correct. fact8: If that this GAD is not a spoiling is correct then the fact that this phrenologist is principled but it is not a pontificate is incorrect. fact9: The fact that this phrenologist is a kind of principled one that is not a pontificate does not hold. fact10: If that corm is a seventies and is unprincipled this phrenologist is not frontal. fact11: This GAD is not a kind of a spoiling if that corm proceeds and is a seventies. fact12: This GAD is not a spoiling if that corm proceeds but it is not a seventies.

fact1: ¬{AB}{a} fact2: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬(¬{C}{c} & {D}{c}) fact3: ¬{A}{a} -> ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact4: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{AB}{a} fact5: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬(¬{C}{c} & ¬{D}{c}) fact6: ¬(¬{C}{c} & {D}{c}) fact7: ¬{B}{c} fact8: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬({C}{c} & ¬{D}{c}) fact9: ¬({C}{c} & ¬{D}{c}) fact10: ({AB}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> ¬{A}{c} fact11: ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact12: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That corm is not a seventies. fact2: If this GAD is not a spoiling then that this phrenologist is not principled but he/she is a pontificate does not hold. fact3: That corm proceeds but this is not a seventies if the fact that that corm is not frontal hold. fact4: That corm is not a seventies if that corm is not frontal. fact5: If this GAD is not a kind of a spoiling that this phrenologist is not principled and that is not a pontificate is incorrect. fact6: That this phrenologist is not principled and is a pontificate does not hold. fact7: The fact that this phrenologist is not a kind of a spoiling is correct. fact8: If that this GAD is not a spoiling is correct then the fact that this phrenologist is principled but it is not a pontificate is incorrect. fact9: The fact that this phrenologist is a kind of principled one that is not a pontificate does not hold. fact10: If that corm is a seventies and is unprincipled this phrenologist is not frontal. fact11: This GAD is not a kind of a spoiling if that corm proceeds and is a seventies. fact12: This GAD is not a spoiling if that corm proceeds but it is not a seventies. ; $hypothesis$ = This phrenologist is not principled and the thing is not a pontificate. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That side is not inquisitorial.

¬{AB}{aa}

fact1: That side is not a herald if it is concave. fact2: If that some man is not a herald but it is not non-concave is incorrect then it is not inquisitorial. fact3: The fact that that side is concave is not incorrect. fact4: Some man is a murdered and is inquisitorial if that person is not a herald. fact5: The propanone is inquisitorial.

fact1: {B}{aa} -> ¬{A}{aa} fact2: (x): ¬(¬{A}x & {B}x) -> ¬{AB}x fact3: {B}{aa} fact4: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({AA}x & {AB}x) fact5: {AB}{fn}

That side is not inquisitorial.

¬{AB}{aa}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That side is not a herald if it is concave. fact2: If that some man is not a herald but it is not non-concave is incorrect then it is not inquisitorial. fact3: The fact that that side is concave is not incorrect. fact4: Some man is a murdered and is inquisitorial if that person is not a herald. fact5: The propanone is inquisitorial. ; $hypothesis$ = That side is not inquisitorial. ; $proof$ =

fact4 -> int1: That side is both a murdered and inquisitorial if that side is not a herald.; fact3 & fact1 -> int2: That side is not a herald.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That side is a kind of a murdered and it is inquisitorial.; int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This expert is a revery.

{C}{c}

fact1: If the fact that this lip is not a kind of a bluffness but it is Marxist is not right then this lip is not citric. fact2: That this lip is a bluffness and she/he is Marxist is wrong. fact3: The fact that this lip is not a bluffness but it is Marxist is incorrect. fact4: If this lip is non-citric this hoper is rude. fact5: This lip is not citric if this lip is a bluffness. fact6: This expert is a kind of a revery if this hoper is rude.

fact1: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact2: ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact3: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact4: ¬{B}{a} -> {A}{b} fact5: {AA}{a} -> ¬{B}{a} fact6: {A}{b} -> {C}{c}

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: If the fact that this lip is not a kind of a bluffness but it is Marxist is not right then this lip is not citric. fact2: That this lip is a bluffness and she/he is Marxist is wrong. fact3: The fact that this lip is not a bluffness but it is Marxist is incorrect. fact4: If this lip is non-citric this hoper is rude. fact5: This lip is not citric if this lip is a bluffness. fact6: This expert is a kind of a revery if this hoper is rude. ; $hypothesis$ = This expert is a revery. ; $proof$ =

fact1 & fact3 -> int1: This lip is not citric.; int1 & fact4 -> int2: That this hoper is rude is true.; int2 & fact6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This ravigote does not uncluttered carcinosarcoma.

¬{A}{a}

fact1: The fact that this acetaldol is uncompartmented and it does ruddle southeastward is wrong. fact2: That this acetaldol is not uncompartmented but it ruddles southeastward is wrong if this ravigote does uncluttered carcinosarcoma. fact3: The fact that somebody does not uncluttered carcinosarcoma and is not ulnar is incorrect if the fact that the one is siliceous is right. fact4: If some man is not uncomplimentary that it does horripilate Musgoi and is a fractal is wrong. fact5: This ravigote is not late if the fact that this acetaldol does horripilate Musgoi and is a fractal is incorrect. fact6: If the fact that this ravigote uncluttereds carcinosarcoma hold the fact that this acetaldol is not compartmented and that ruddles southeastward is wrong. fact7: If that Redskin is ulnar then this acetaldol is not uncompartmented and ruddles southeastward. fact8: Some person is a kind of siliceous person that is a fifteenth if she is not late. fact9: That Redskin is ulnar. fact10: Something does uncluttered carcinosarcoma if that it does not uncluttered carcinosarcoma and it is not ulnar is false.

fact1: ¬({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact2: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact3: (x): {C}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & ¬{B}x) fact4: (x): ¬{H}x -> ¬({G}x & {F}x) fact5: ¬({G}{b} & {F}{b}) -> ¬{E}{a} fact6: {A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact7: {B}{c} -> (¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact8: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({C}x & {D}x) fact9: {B}{c} fact10: (x): ¬(¬{A}x & ¬{B}x) -> {A}x

Let's assume that the fact that this ravigote uncluttereds carcinosarcoma is true.

{A}{a}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that this acetaldol is uncompartmented and it does ruddle southeastward is wrong. fact2: That this acetaldol is not uncompartmented but it ruddles southeastward is wrong if this ravigote does uncluttered carcinosarcoma. fact3: The fact that somebody does not uncluttered carcinosarcoma and is not ulnar is incorrect if the fact that the one is siliceous is right. fact4: If some man is not uncomplimentary that it does horripilate Musgoi and is a fractal is wrong. fact5: This ravigote is not late if the fact that this acetaldol does horripilate Musgoi and is a fractal is incorrect. fact6: If the fact that this ravigote uncluttereds carcinosarcoma hold the fact that this acetaldol is not compartmented and that ruddles southeastward is wrong. fact7: If that Redskin is ulnar then this acetaldol is not uncompartmented and ruddles southeastward. fact8: Some person is a kind of siliceous person that is a fifteenth if she is not late. fact9: That Redskin is ulnar. fact10: Something does uncluttered carcinosarcoma if that it does not uncluttered carcinosarcoma and it is not ulnar is false. ; $hypothesis$ = This ravigote does not uncluttered carcinosarcoma. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that this ravigote uncluttereds carcinosarcoma is true.; fact2 & assump1 -> int1: The fact that this acetaldol is compartmented man that ruddles southeastward is false.; fact7 & fact9 -> int2: This acetaldol is a kind of compartmented man that does ruddle southeastward.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

The fact that that either that maconnais is not positional or she is not ametropic or both hold does not hold.

¬(¬{AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa})

fact1: That maconnais is not a Iraki but non-aquiferous. fact2: If something is undulatory it is both not non-positional and funded. fact3: That maconnais is ametropic. fact4: The fact that something is not positional and/or it is not undulatory is incorrect if it is not ametropic. fact5: Someone is not non-ametropic if the person is not unfunded. fact6: That some person is not positional and/or is not ametropic does not hold if the person is not unfunded. fact7: That maconnais is not undulatory. fact8: That maconnais is not positional if that scopolamine is positional but that person is not unfunded. fact9: If that maconnais is not unfunded then that maconnais is not non-ametropic. fact10: If something is a kind of a centennial then that is undulatory. fact11: That maconnais is not unfunded and it is non-undulatory. fact12: This IDP is both not a Vicugna and not undulatory.

fact1: (¬{AR}{aa} & ¬{EE}{aa}) fact2: (x): {B}x -> ({AA}x & ¬{A}x) fact3: {AB}{aa} fact4: (x): ¬{AB}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x v ¬{B}x) fact5: (x): ¬{A}x -> {AB}x fact6: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x) fact7: ¬{B}{aa} fact8: ({AA}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) -> ¬{AA}{aa} fact9: ¬{A}{aa} -> {AB}{aa} fact10: (x): {C}x -> {B}x fact11: (¬{A}{aa} & ¬{B}{aa}) fact12: (¬{FI}{em} & ¬{B}{em})

That maconnais is not positional and/or it is not ametropic.

(¬{AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That maconnais is not a Iraki but non-aquiferous. fact2: If something is undulatory it is both not non-positional and funded. fact3: That maconnais is ametropic. fact4: The fact that something is not positional and/or it is not undulatory is incorrect if it is not ametropic. fact5: Someone is not non-ametropic if the person is not unfunded. fact6: That some person is not positional and/or is not ametropic does not hold if the person is not unfunded. fact7: That maconnais is not undulatory. fact8: That maconnais is not positional if that scopolamine is positional but that person is not unfunded. fact9: If that maconnais is not unfunded then that maconnais is not non-ametropic. fact10: If something is a kind of a centennial then that is undulatory. fact11: That maconnais is not unfunded and it is non-undulatory. fact12: This IDP is both not a Vicugna and not undulatory. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that either that maconnais is not positional or she is not ametropic or both hold does not hold. ; $proof$ =

fact6 -> int1: That the fact that either that maconnais is non-positional or he is not ametropic or both is false is correct if he is not unfunded.; fact11 -> int2: That maconnais is not unfunded.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

The fact that if that intuiting does not happens and that Charlestoning happens this variolarness happens is not true.

¬((¬{AA} & {AB}) -> {A})

fact1: That that maturedness does not occurs yields that this variolarness happens. fact2: If the fact that that maturedness and this etching Mithraicism happens is false this etching Mithraicism does not happens. fact3: That the interplanetariness occurs is prevented by that this atm happens and the discontinuance occurs. fact4: This variolarness happens if that that intuiting happens and that Charlestoning happens hold. fact5: The fact that that maturedness and this etching Mithraicism occurs is wrong if this variolarness does not happens. fact6: That this trespass but notthe abating Antakiya happens leads to that non-variolarness.

fact1: ¬{B} -> {A} fact2: ¬({B} & {CP}) -> ¬{CP} fact3: ({BC} & {HB}) -> ¬{M} fact4: ({AA} & {AB}) -> {A} fact5: ¬{A} -> ¬({B} & {CP}) fact6: ({C} & ¬{D}) -> ¬{A}

This etching Mithraicism does not occurs.

¬{CP}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That that maturedness does not occurs yields that this variolarness happens. fact2: If the fact that that maturedness and this etching Mithraicism happens is false this etching Mithraicism does not happens. fact3: That the interplanetariness occurs is prevented by that this atm happens and the discontinuance occurs. fact4: This variolarness happens if that that intuiting happens and that Charlestoning happens hold. fact5: The fact that that maturedness and this etching Mithraicism occurs is wrong if this variolarness does not happens. fact6: That this trespass but notthe abating Antakiya happens leads to that non-variolarness. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that if that intuiting does not happens and that Charlestoning happens this variolarness happens is not true. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

The fact that this Zoroastrian is a ninetieth but it is not conventional does not hold.

¬({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a})

fact1: This Zoroastrian is a Afroasiatic and is a ninetieth. fact2: Something is not a kind of a Afroasiatic if the fact that it is a kind of a Echeneididae and it is not a kind of a gimmickry does not hold. fact3: That something is both a Echeneididae and not a gimmickry is not true if that thing is not a Clinidae. fact4: That this Zoroastrian is a Afroasiatic is true. fact5: If someone is not a xerophthalmia he/she is not a Clinidae. fact6: That some person is a ninetieth but not conventional is not true if it is not a Afroasiatic. fact7: This tasse is unreverberant and/or this one does constringe if this DNA is not pronounceable.

fact1: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact2: (x): ¬({D}x & ¬{E}x) -> ¬{A}x fact3: (x): ¬{F}x -> ¬({D}x & ¬{E}x) fact4: {A}{a} fact5: (x): ¬{G}x -> ¬{F}x fact6: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({B}x & ¬{C}x) fact7: ¬{J}{c} -> ({H}{b} v {I}{b})

The fact that this Zoroastrian is a ninetieth but it is not conventional does not hold.

¬({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This Zoroastrian is a Afroasiatic and is a ninetieth. fact2: Something is not a kind of a Afroasiatic if the fact that it is a kind of a Echeneididae and it is not a kind of a gimmickry does not hold. fact3: That something is both a Echeneididae and not a gimmickry is not true if that thing is not a Clinidae. fact4: That this Zoroastrian is a Afroasiatic is true. fact5: If someone is not a xerophthalmia he/she is not a Clinidae. fact6: That some person is a ninetieth but not conventional is not true if it is not a Afroasiatic. fact7: This tasse is unreverberant and/or this one does constringe if this DNA is not pronounceable. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that this Zoroastrian is a ninetieth but it is not conventional does not hold. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

Let's assume that either that enforcing coloured happens or that prudentness does not happens or both.

({A} v ¬{B})

fact1: The clangoring does not happens. fact2: The fact that this discreetness happens and/or this eurythmy does not occurs does not hold. fact3: The fact that this presence happens hold if that enforcing coloured happens. fact4: That enforcing coloured happens if this presence does not occurs and this unvigilantness does not occurs. fact5: That cutting does not occurs. fact6: If that enforcing coloured occurs then this presence does not occurs. fact7: The rescission does not occurs if that enforcing coloured does not occurs. fact8: That infantilism causes this unvigilantness. fact9: The fact that this sales occurs or the formality does not happens or both is incorrect. fact10: This presence happens. fact11: If the incandescing tilde happens then that the relaying blissfulness does not happens is right. fact12: This non-prudentness prevents that this presence occurs.

fact1: ¬{CJ} fact2: ¬({CP} v ¬{BF}) fact3: {A} -> {C} fact4: (¬{C} & ¬{D}) -> {A} fact5: ¬{JH} fact6: {A} -> ¬{C} fact7: ¬{A} -> ¬{AO} fact8: {E} -> {D} fact9: ¬({HK} v ¬{HA}) fact10: {C} fact11: {EE} -> ¬{GS} fact12: ¬{B} -> ¬{C}

The rescission does not happens.

¬{AO}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The clangoring does not happens. fact2: The fact that this discreetness happens and/or this eurythmy does not occurs does not hold. fact3: The fact that this presence happens hold if that enforcing coloured happens. fact4: That enforcing coloured happens if this presence does not occurs and this unvigilantness does not occurs. fact5: That cutting does not occurs. fact6: If that enforcing coloured occurs then this presence does not occurs. fact7: The rescission does not occurs if that enforcing coloured does not occurs. fact8: That infantilism causes this unvigilantness. fact9: The fact that this sales occurs or the formality does not happens or both is incorrect. fact10: This presence happens. fact11: If the incandescing tilde happens then that the relaying blissfulness does not happens is right. fact12: This non-prudentness prevents that this presence occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = Let's assume that either that enforcing coloured happens or that prudentness does not happens or both. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that either that enforcing coloured happens or that prudentness does not happens or both.; assump1 & fact6 & fact12 -> int1: This presence does not occurs.; int1 & fact10 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That superman is syphilitic.

{C}{a}

fact1: That that superman is not a crazed and is a Cotopaxi is right. fact2: That superman does not debauch Martes if that thing is not a crazed and that thing is a Cotopaxi. fact3: Every man Hales.

fact1: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact2: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact3: (x): {A}x

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That that superman is not a crazed and is a Cotopaxi is right. fact2: That superman does not debauch Martes if that thing is not a crazed and that thing is a Cotopaxi. fact3: Every man Hales. ; $hypothesis$ = That superman is syphilitic. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

Both that call and that feuding occurs.

({B} & {C})

fact1: That non-unserviceableness yields that this Attic and that itineration occurs. fact2: That backpackinging hypoglycaemia occurs. fact3: If that keeling happens that circle occurs. fact4: The unweanedness happens and this reportableness happens. fact5: The fact that this clipping happens is right. fact6: If either that unserviceableness happens or that circle does not occurs or both then the fact that this recessiveness occurs does not hold. fact7: That that facial occurs prevents that that keeling happens. fact8: That unserviceableness does not occurs. fact9: That non-Guatemalanness triggers that that unserviceableness and the relief occurs. fact10: If the fact that that keeling does not happens hold that that call happens and that feuding occurs does not hold. fact11: The viscosimetricness and the unconstitutionalness occurs. fact12: If the fact that that itineration occurs but that facial does not occurs is not correct then that facial occurs. fact13: That keeling happens. fact14: That feuding happens. fact15: That keeling and that call happens. fact16: If the fact that this recessiveness does not occurs hold then that that itineration but notthat facial happens is incorrect.

fact1: ¬{G} -> ({JB} & {F}) fact2: {HA} fact3: {A} -> {H} fact4: ({HN} & {EQ}) fact5: {BK} fact6: ({G} v ¬{H}) -> ¬{E} fact7: {D} -> ¬{A} fact8: ¬{G} fact9: ¬{J} -> ({G} & {I}) fact10: ¬{A} -> ¬({B} & {C}) fact11: ({HL} & {BE}) fact12: ¬({F} & ¬{D}) -> {D} fact13: {A} fact14: {C} fact15: ({A} & {B}) fact16: ¬{E} -> ¬({F} & ¬{D})

The fact that the fact that both that call and that feuding occurs is false is true.

¬({B} & {C})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That non-unserviceableness yields that this Attic and that itineration occurs. fact2: That backpackinging hypoglycaemia occurs. fact3: If that keeling happens that circle occurs. fact4: The unweanedness happens and this reportableness happens. fact5: The fact that this clipping happens is right. fact6: If either that unserviceableness happens or that circle does not occurs or both then the fact that this recessiveness occurs does not hold. fact7: That that facial occurs prevents that that keeling happens. fact8: That unserviceableness does not occurs. fact9: That non-Guatemalanness triggers that that unserviceableness and the relief occurs. fact10: If the fact that that keeling does not happens hold that that call happens and that feuding occurs does not hold. fact11: The viscosimetricness and the unconstitutionalness occurs. fact12: If the fact that that itineration occurs but that facial does not occurs is not correct then that facial occurs. fact13: That keeling happens. fact14: That feuding happens. fact15: That keeling and that call happens. fact16: If the fact that this recessiveness does not occurs hold then that that itineration but notthat facial happens is incorrect. ; $hypothesis$ = Both that call and that feuding occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact15 -> int1: That call happens.; int1 & fact14 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

Let's assume that the fact that that wardenship does not occurs hold.

¬{A}

fact1: The lambasting occurs. fact2: If that wardenship does not happens this irradiation does not happens. fact3: If this littering bonyness happens and this naught does not occurs then this irradiation occurs. fact4: The cull does not happens. fact5: This permeating Bloomeria happens. fact6: That this aquiculturalness does not occurs is brought about by that that option does not happens. fact7: This wiving Brueghel does not occurs. fact8: This littering bonyness does not occurs. fact9: The tort does not occurs. fact10: That the dyeing farrago does not happens is triggered by that the lodgingsing does not occurs. fact11: That shambling does not occurs and that crowding Khoikhoin does not happens. fact12: If the pumping does not happens and that dislodging buffeted does not occurs then that Ramessesing Tallinn occurs. fact13: This irradiation occurs if this littering bonyness does not occurs and this naught does not happens. fact14: The anatomical occurs. fact15: That that spotting Cicadellidae does not happens yields that this feminism does not occurs. fact16: That obeisance does not occurs. fact17: This puffing Lycaeon occurs if that PMS does not occurs and the abscondment does not occurs. fact18: That filming does not happens and this promise does not occurs. fact19: If this littering bonyness does not happens and this irradiation does not occurs that wardenship does not happens.

fact1: {ES} fact2: ¬{A} -> ¬{B} fact3: ({C} & ¬{D}) -> {B} fact4: ¬{BP} fact5: {DC} fact6: ¬{DO} -> ¬{CH} fact7: ¬{AE} fact8: ¬{C} fact9: ¬{CS} fact10: ¬{DS} -> ¬{O} fact11: (¬{FF} & ¬{F}) fact12: (¬{HF} & ¬{EC}) -> {AQ} fact13: (¬{C} & ¬{D}) -> {B} fact14: {AK} fact15: ¬{CK} -> ¬{CC} fact16: ¬{GG} fact17: (¬{FD} & ¬{HT}) -> {CE} fact18: (¬{GJ} & ¬{HH}) fact19: (¬{C} & ¬{B}) -> ¬{A}

Let's assume that the fact that that wardenship does not occurs hold.

¬{A}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The lambasting occurs. fact2: If that wardenship does not happens this irradiation does not happens. fact3: If this littering bonyness happens and this naught does not occurs then this irradiation occurs. fact4: The cull does not happens. fact5: This permeating Bloomeria happens. fact6: That this aquiculturalness does not occurs is brought about by that that option does not happens. fact7: This wiving Brueghel does not occurs. fact8: This littering bonyness does not occurs. fact9: The tort does not occurs. fact10: That the dyeing farrago does not happens is triggered by that the lodgingsing does not occurs. fact11: That shambling does not occurs and that crowding Khoikhoin does not happens. fact12: If the pumping does not happens and that dislodging buffeted does not occurs then that Ramessesing Tallinn occurs. fact13: This irradiation occurs if this littering bonyness does not occurs and this naught does not happens. fact14: The anatomical occurs. fact15: That that spotting Cicadellidae does not happens yields that this feminism does not occurs. fact16: That obeisance does not occurs. fact17: This puffing Lycaeon occurs if that PMS does not occurs and the abscondment does not occurs. fact18: That filming does not happens and this promise does not occurs. fact19: If this littering bonyness does not happens and this irradiation does not occurs that wardenship does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = Let's assume that the fact that that wardenship does not occurs hold. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This taximeter does not tamper Moharram.

¬{C}{a}

fact1: This taximeter is a kind of non-Appalachian one that is not a tailed. fact2: That this taximeter is not a kind of a Sauropoda and she is not a phrase is incorrect. fact3: This taximeter is a kaluresis. fact4: If that some man does not provision contractility and does not swerve is incorrect it swerve. fact5: If some man swerves then he/she is a kaluresis but not pessimistic. fact6: If that the fact that this taximeter is not a kaluresis and it is not pessimistic does not hold is right it does not tamper Moharram. fact7: The fact that this bamboo is not a kind of a ultramontane is not wrong if it dibbles Hylactophryne. fact8: Something that does not rewrite SoHo swerves and tampers Moharram. fact9: Kira is pessimistic. fact10: If something is a kaluresis but not pessimistic it does tamper Moharram.

fact1: (¬{K}{a} & ¬{BA}{a}) fact2: ¬(¬{GA}{a} & ¬{BD}{a}) fact3: {A}{a} fact4: (x): ¬(¬{F}x & ¬{D}x) -> {D}x fact5: (x): {D}x -> ({A}x & ¬{B}x) fact6: ¬(¬{A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> ¬{C}{a} fact7: {DI}{hh} -> ¬{FB}{hh} fact8: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({D}x & {C}x) fact9: {B}{gh} fact10: (x): ({A}x & ¬{B}x) -> {C}x

That tenderizer is not pessimistic.

¬{B}{ae}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This taximeter is a kind of non-Appalachian one that is not a tailed. fact2: That this taximeter is not a kind of a Sauropoda and she is not a phrase is incorrect. fact3: This taximeter is a kaluresis. fact4: If that some man does not provision contractility and does not swerve is incorrect it swerve. fact5: If some man swerves then he/she is a kaluresis but not pessimistic. fact6: If that the fact that this taximeter is not a kaluresis and it is not pessimistic does not hold is right it does not tamper Moharram. fact7: The fact that this bamboo is not a kind of a ultramontane is not wrong if it dibbles Hylactophryne. fact8: Something that does not rewrite SoHo swerves and tampers Moharram. fact9: Kira is pessimistic. fact10: If something is a kaluresis but not pessimistic it does tamper Moharram. ; $hypothesis$ = This taximeter does not tamper Moharram. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that this taximeter is not a kaluresis and it is not pessimistic.; assump1 -> int1: This taximeter is not a kind of a kaluresis.; int1 & fact3 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: That this taximeter is both not a kaluresis and not pessimistic is incorrect.; int3 & fact6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That mural is a audile.

{B}{b}

fact1: If something is unrenewable it is unpalatable and not aft. fact2: That mural is non-aft if that entanglement is both unpalatable and not non-aft. fact3: Cecy is not a Beria. fact4: That that entanglement is a subservientness and/or a Dyirbal does not hold. fact5: If something is not aft then it is a audile and it is provocative. fact6: If the fact that that entanglement is a audile and/or a Dyirbal is wrong that mural is not a subservientness. fact7: Andi is not a subservientness. fact8: That entanglement is not a audile if that either that mural is a Dyirbal or the thing is a subservientness or both does not hold. fact9: That entanglement is not a subservientness if that either that mural is a audile or that is a Dyirbal or both is not right. fact10: If that that entanglement is a kind of a Dyirbal and/or this is a audile is incorrect then that mural is not a subservientness. fact11: That the sheatfish either chants or is a mujahadin or both is incorrect. fact12: That entanglement is not a Dyirbal. fact13: If that that mural is a kind of a subservientness and/or it is a kind of a audile is not true that entanglement is not a Dyirbal. fact14: That entanglement is a kind of unrenewable man that is a bowed if that entanglement is not a Beria. fact15: That that entanglement is a Dyirbal and/or is a Ochoa is incorrect. fact16: That that entanglement is not Europocentric is correct.

fact1: (x): {D}x -> ({E}x & ¬{C}x) fact2: ({E}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> ¬{C}{b} fact3: ¬{G}{c} fact4: ¬({AA}{a} v {AB}{a}) fact5: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({B}x & {A}x) fact6: ¬({B}{a} v {AB}{a}) -> ¬{AA}{b} fact7: ¬{AA}{aa} fact8: ¬({AB}{b} v {AA}{b}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact9: ¬({B}{b} v {AB}{b}) -> ¬{AA}{a} fact10: ¬({AB}{a} v {B}{a}) -> ¬{AA}{b} fact11: ¬({IH}{ch} v {EM}{ch}) fact12: ¬{AB}{a} fact13: ¬({AA}{b} v {B}{b}) -> ¬{AB}{a} fact14: ¬{G}{a} -> ({D}{a} & {F}{a}) fact15: ¬({AB}{a} v {AK}{a}) fact16: ¬{FH}{a}

That mural is a audile.

{B}{b}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If something is unrenewable it is unpalatable and not aft. fact2: That mural is non-aft if that entanglement is both unpalatable and not non-aft. fact3: Cecy is not a Beria. fact4: That that entanglement is a subservientness and/or a Dyirbal does not hold. fact5: If something is not aft then it is a audile and it is provocative. fact6: If the fact that that entanglement is a audile and/or a Dyirbal is wrong that mural is not a subservientness. fact7: Andi is not a subservientness. fact8: That entanglement is not a audile if that either that mural is a Dyirbal or the thing is a subservientness or both does not hold. fact9: That entanglement is not a subservientness if that either that mural is a audile or that is a Dyirbal or both is not right. fact10: If that that entanglement is a kind of a Dyirbal and/or this is a audile is incorrect then that mural is not a subservientness. fact11: That the sheatfish either chants or is a mujahadin or both is incorrect. fact12: That entanglement is not a Dyirbal. fact13: If that that mural is a kind of a subservientness and/or it is a kind of a audile is not true that entanglement is not a Dyirbal. fact14: That entanglement is a kind of unrenewable man that is a bowed if that entanglement is not a Beria. fact15: That that entanglement is a Dyirbal and/or is a Ochoa is incorrect. fact16: That that entanglement is not Europocentric is correct. ; $hypothesis$ = That mural is a audile. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This lectureship does not occurs.

¬{A}

fact1: The kibitzing Thamnophilus happens. fact2: If that miniaturisation occurs then that this unimpairedness does not happens and this lesson does not occurs does not hold. fact3: The wreck occurs. fact4: This nonreflectiveness happens. fact5: The asphyxiation occurs. fact6: The fiddling acataphasia occurs. fact7: If the zygodactylness does not occurs then this lectureship and this swiping Solanopteris happens. fact8: The dressing occurs. fact9: This lectureship happens. fact10: The unintendedness occurs. fact11: If that this unimpairedness does not happens and this lesson does not happens is false this lesson occurs. fact12: This lesson happens. fact13: This impalement happens.

fact1: {HQ} fact2: {E} -> ¬(¬{F} & ¬{D}) fact3: {IS} fact4: {GG} fact5: {HA} fact6: {T} fact7: ¬{B} -> ({A} & {H}) fact8: {DM} fact9: {A} fact10: {R} fact11: ¬(¬{F} & ¬{D}) -> {D} fact12: {D} fact13: {IT}

This swiping Solanopteris happens.

{H}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The kibitzing Thamnophilus happens. fact2: If that miniaturisation occurs then that this unimpairedness does not happens and this lesson does not occurs does not hold. fact3: The wreck occurs. fact4: This nonreflectiveness happens. fact5: The asphyxiation occurs. fact6: The fiddling acataphasia occurs. fact7: If the zygodactylness does not occurs then this lectureship and this swiping Solanopteris happens. fact8: The dressing occurs. fact9: This lectureship happens. fact10: The unintendedness occurs. fact11: If that this unimpairedness does not happens and this lesson does not happens is false this lesson occurs. fact12: This lesson happens. fact13: This impalement happens. ; $hypothesis$ = This lectureship does not occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That this cytoplasmicness does not happens but this paging occurs hold.

(¬{AA} & {AB})

fact1: If that hemalness occurs the fact that notthat tribalization but this cytoplasmicness happens is false. fact2: That notthis cytoplasmicness but this paging occurs does not hold if that persecution occurs. fact3: That both that xenogeneicness and that hemalness occurs is caused by that this straying shamed does not happens. fact4: That notthe slimming but this straying shamed happens does not hold. fact5: That that persecution does not occurs does not hold. fact6: If that that tribalization does not occurs but this cytoplasmicness occurs does not hold then this cytoplasmicness does not happens.

fact1: {D} -> ¬(¬{C} & {AA}) fact2: {A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) fact3: ¬{F} -> ({E} & {D}) fact4: ¬(¬{DN} & {F}) fact5: {A} fact6: ¬(¬{C} & {AA}) -> ¬{AA}

That this cytoplasmicness does not happens but this paging occurs hold.

(¬{AA} & {AB})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that hemalness occurs the fact that notthat tribalization but this cytoplasmicness happens is false. fact2: That notthis cytoplasmicness but this paging occurs does not hold if that persecution occurs. fact3: That both that xenogeneicness and that hemalness occurs is caused by that this straying shamed does not happens. fact4: That notthe slimming but this straying shamed happens does not hold. fact5: That that persecution does not occurs does not hold. fact6: If that that tribalization does not occurs but this cytoplasmicness occurs does not hold then this cytoplasmicness does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That this cytoplasmicness does not happens but this paging occurs hold. ; $proof$ =

fact2 & fact5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

The fact that there exists somebody such that if the person is not a Zygocactus then the person orbits Saskatchewan and Crusades satiety is incorrect.

¬((Ex): ¬{A}x -> ({AA}x & {AB}x))

fact1: That canvas is both a piece and a Zygocactus if that canvas is an information. fact2: There exists some person such that if that person does not cloak that person does feature Douala and sets ailurophobia. fact3: If that elixir does not hem then that elixir is auriculoventricular and it does swosh sogginess. fact4: There is someone such that if it is not sporadic then it is cellulosid and it fragmentizes Carya. fact5: The histidine is a Zygocactus if it does not satiate. fact6: This realm is a fingered that is an epidural if this realm does not orbit Saskatchewan. fact7: There is something such that if that it enfeebles Yi is right it is both Jamaican and impermeable.

fact1: {S}{ak} -> ({DN}{ak} & {A}{ak}) fact2: (Ex): ¬{IP}x -> ({FF}x & {JC}x) fact3: ¬{HF}{aa} -> ({GU}{aa} & {EF}{aa}) fact4: (Ex): ¬{M}x -> ({EQ}x & {BE}x) fact5: ¬{HP}{o} -> {A}{o} fact6: ¬{AA}{gn} -> ({GS}{gn} & {F}{gn}) fact7: (Ex): {HI}x -> ({J}x & {CM}x)

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That canvas is both a piece and a Zygocactus if that canvas is an information. fact2: There exists some person such that if that person does not cloak that person does feature Douala and sets ailurophobia. fact3: If that elixir does not hem then that elixir is auriculoventricular and it does swosh sogginess. fact4: There is someone such that if it is not sporadic then it is cellulosid and it fragmentizes Carya. fact5: The histidine is a Zygocactus if it does not satiate. fact6: This realm is a fingered that is an epidural if this realm does not orbit Saskatchewan. fact7: There is something such that if that it enfeebles Yi is right it is both Jamaican and impermeable. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that there exists somebody such that if the person is not a Zygocactus then the person orbits Saskatchewan and Crusades satiety is incorrect. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That that avuncularness happens hold.

{A}

fact1: The needlework happens. fact2: That this fixing occurs results in that this wilting does not happens but that earliness happens. fact3: If this formalising PSF does not occurs then both this nonplussing decasyllable and that avuncularness happens. fact4: The shooting occurs. fact5: The fact that this trachealness does not occurs is not false if the fact that this wilting does not happens but that earliness occurs hold. fact6: The bite occurs. fact7: The inoculating Carolinas occurs. fact8: This thoracicness occurs. fact9: That roughness occurs. fact10: The bidirectionalness occurs. fact11: The unwariness occurs. fact12: If the fact that that avuncularness and this formalising PSF happens is false that avuncularness does not occurs. fact13: This formalising PSF does not happens if this trachealness does not occurs and that sufficing occurs. fact14: The incident occurs. fact15: The fact that the undependableness happens hold.

fact1: {EB} fact2: {I} -> (¬{E} & {F}) fact3: ¬{B} -> ({FM} & {A}) fact4: {FQ} fact5: (¬{E} & {F}) -> ¬{C} fact6: {G} fact7: {DJ} fact8: {HR} fact9: {AE} fact10: {IN} fact11: {ER} fact12: ¬({A} & {B}) -> ¬{A} fact13: (¬{C} & {D}) -> ¬{B} fact14: {FK} fact15: {AG}

The fact that that avuncularness does not happens hold.

¬{A}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The needlework happens. fact2: That this fixing occurs results in that this wilting does not happens but that earliness happens. fact3: If this formalising PSF does not occurs then both this nonplussing decasyllable and that avuncularness happens. fact4: The shooting occurs. fact5: The fact that this trachealness does not occurs is not false if the fact that this wilting does not happens but that earliness occurs hold. fact6: The bite occurs. fact7: The inoculating Carolinas occurs. fact8: This thoracicness occurs. fact9: That roughness occurs. fact10: The bidirectionalness occurs. fact11: The unwariness occurs. fact12: If the fact that that avuncularness and this formalising PSF happens is false that avuncularness does not occurs. fact13: This formalising PSF does not happens if this trachealness does not occurs and that sufficing occurs. fact14: The incident occurs. fact15: The fact that the undependableness happens hold. ; $hypothesis$ = That that avuncularness happens hold. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That ironmongery is not a orneriness.

¬{B}{aa}

fact1: The fact that that ironmongery is both a leafing and a light is incorrect. fact2: Something that does not nudge Washington is not a orneriness. fact3: Somebody is not a Trautvetteria if that this one nudges Washington and this one skins Equus does not hold. fact4: Something is mediaeval if that is not non-noisy. fact5: That ironmongery does not abridge nosebleed. fact6: That ironmongery is not a kind of a Trautvetteria. fact7: If that somebody is social and it is a Anura is wrong it is not phonologic. fact8: This rhizoid does not skin Equus. fact9: If something is mediaeval then it is both a orneriness and not a Trautvetteria. fact10: This slugabed does not nudge Washington. fact11: If the fact that Ida is a Anura and captivates NICU does not hold Ida does not skin Equus. fact12: The fact that that ironmongery nudges Washington and skins Equus is incorrect if it is not a Trautvetteria. fact13: If Isela is noisy that ironmongery is noisy. fact14: If that that ironmongery cognises contemplativeness and flogs is incorrect then it does not impair Guayaquil. fact15: That something is not a kind of a Trautvetteria hold if the fact that it skins Equus and it nudges Washington is wrong. fact16: If that ironmongery does not nudge Washington that ironmongery is not a orneriness. fact17: That that ironmongery is noisy thing that nudges Washington does not hold.

fact1: ¬({AT}{aa} & {AS}{aa}) fact2: (x): ¬{AA}x -> ¬{B}x fact3: (x): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{A}x fact4: (x): {D}x -> {C}x fact5: ¬{JD}{aa} fact6: ¬{A}{aa} fact7: (x): ¬({EQ}x & {ID}x) -> ¬{JE}x fact8: ¬{AB}{j} fact9: (x): {C}x -> ({B}x & ¬{A}x) fact10: ¬{AA}{jb} fact11: ¬({ID}{bo} & {FK}{bo}) -> ¬{AB}{bo} fact12: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) fact13: {D}{a} -> {D}{aa} fact14: ¬({CD}{aa} & {HI}{aa}) -> ¬{DR}{aa} fact15: (x): ¬({AB}x & {AA}x) -> ¬{A}x fact16: ¬{AA}{aa} -> ¬{B}{aa} fact17: ¬({D}{aa} & {AA}{aa})

That ironmongery is a orneriness.

{B}{aa}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that that ironmongery is both a leafing and a light is incorrect. fact2: Something that does not nudge Washington is not a orneriness. fact3: Somebody is not a Trautvetteria if that this one nudges Washington and this one skins Equus does not hold. fact4: Something is mediaeval if that is not non-noisy. fact5: That ironmongery does not abridge nosebleed. fact6: That ironmongery is not a kind of a Trautvetteria. fact7: If that somebody is social and it is a Anura is wrong it is not phonologic. fact8: This rhizoid does not skin Equus. fact9: If something is mediaeval then it is both a orneriness and not a Trautvetteria. fact10: This slugabed does not nudge Washington. fact11: If the fact that Ida is a Anura and captivates NICU does not hold Ida does not skin Equus. fact12: The fact that that ironmongery nudges Washington and skins Equus is incorrect if it is not a Trautvetteria. fact13: If Isela is noisy that ironmongery is noisy. fact14: If that that ironmongery cognises contemplativeness and flogs is incorrect then it does not impair Guayaquil. fact15: That something is not a kind of a Trautvetteria hold if the fact that it skins Equus and it nudges Washington is wrong. fact16: If that ironmongery does not nudge Washington that ironmongery is not a orneriness. fact17: That that ironmongery is noisy thing that nudges Washington does not hold. ; $hypothesis$ = That ironmongery is not a orneriness. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That toothbrush is not a mar.

¬{A}{a}

fact1: The fact that that spoonflower does not dumbfound watchfulness and is not hexangular does not hold. fact2: This head does not deaden and is not a kind of a spin if that mountaineer does not intrude kindliness. fact3: This sledge is exacting if that amiodarone pleads. fact4: If the fact that that spoonflower does not dumbfound watchfulness and is not hexangular does not hold then that spoonflower is hexangular. fact5: If a non-mesoblastic one is not a clamour he is a mar. fact6: If some man does not deaden and is not a spin then this one is not mesoblastic. fact7: That amiodarone is exacting and/or it pleads if the fact that it is not a kind of a Slavic hold. fact8: This sledge is not non-exacting if that amiodarone is non-exacting. fact9: If that some person is a logion but it does not burn classical is right it does not Scout dreamland. fact10: The fact that somebody drugs and intrudes kindliness is false if the one is not a kind of a heteroploidy. fact11: That toothbrush is a mar. fact12: If somebody is hexangular she is not a heteroploidy. fact13: If that this sledge is exacting is not incorrect then that toothbrush is a kind of a logion that does not burn classical. fact14: That if there exists something such that the fact that this drugs and this intrudes kindliness is false that mountaineer does not intrudes kindliness hold. fact15: If something does not Scout dreamland the thing is a rusting. fact16: This head is not a kind of a clamour if that toothbrush is a rusting. fact17: That that amiodarone is not a Slavic hold. fact18: The blintze is a mar.

fact1: ¬(¬{Q}{c} & ¬{N}{c}) fact2: ¬{G}{b} -> (¬{E}{aq} & ¬{D}{aq}) fact3: {O}{e} -> {M}{d} fact4: ¬(¬{Q}{c} & ¬{N}{c}) -> {N}{c} fact5: (x): (¬{B}x & ¬{C}x) -> {A}x fact6: (x): (¬{E}x & ¬{D}x) -> ¬{B}x fact7: ¬{P}{e} -> ({M}{e} v {O}{e}) fact8: {M}{e} -> {M}{d} fact9: (x): ({J}x & ¬{K}x) -> ¬{I}x fact10: (x): ¬{L}x -> ¬({H}x & {G}x) fact11: {A}{a} fact12: (x): {N}x -> ¬{L}x fact13: {M}{d} -> ({J}{a} & ¬{K}{a}) fact14: (x): ¬({H}x & {G}x) -> ¬{G}{b} fact15: (x): ¬{I}x -> {F}x fact16: {F}{a} -> ¬{C}{aq} fact17: ¬{P}{e} fact18: {A}{es}

That this head is a mar hold.

{A}{aq}

DISPROVED

PROVED

DISPROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that that spoonflower does not dumbfound watchfulness and is not hexangular does not hold. fact2: This head does not deaden and is not a kind of a spin if that mountaineer does not intrude kindliness. fact3: This sledge is exacting if that amiodarone pleads. fact4: If the fact that that spoonflower does not dumbfound watchfulness and is not hexangular does not hold then that spoonflower is hexangular. fact5: If a non-mesoblastic one is not a clamour he is a mar. fact6: If some man does not deaden and is not a spin then this one is not mesoblastic. fact7: That amiodarone is exacting and/or it pleads if the fact that it is not a kind of a Slavic hold. fact8: This sledge is not non-exacting if that amiodarone is non-exacting. fact9: If that some person is a logion but it does not burn classical is right it does not Scout dreamland. fact10: The fact that somebody drugs and intrudes kindliness is false if the one is not a kind of a heteroploidy. fact11: That toothbrush is a mar. fact12: If somebody is hexangular she is not a heteroploidy. fact13: If that this sledge is exacting is not incorrect then that toothbrush is a kind of a logion that does not burn classical. fact14: That if there exists something such that the fact that this drugs and this intrudes kindliness is false that mountaineer does not intrudes kindliness hold. fact15: If something does not Scout dreamland the thing is a rusting. fact16: This head is not a kind of a clamour if that toothbrush is a rusting. fact17: That that amiodarone is not a Slavic hold. fact18: The blintze is a mar. ; $hypothesis$ = That toothbrush is not a mar. ; $proof$ =

fact11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This disparager is a Grenadian.

{A}{b}

fact1: This disparager is not a kind of a recombinant. fact2: This disparager does not weed chattel if that it is not a Grenadian and is not a Anemia is false. fact3: That this disparager is not a Anemia and does not wince acousticophobia is wrong. fact4: The fact that this zori is a Grenadian that does not weed chattel is wrong. fact5: If something is a Mbabane the fact that that the thing is a ii but not a Fahrenheit hold does not hold. fact6: If that this disparager does not weed chattel hold this zori is a Grenadian. fact7: If that this disparager does not weed chattel and is not a Grenadian does not hold this disparager is not a Anemia. fact8: If the fact that this zori does not weed chattel and it is not a Anemia does not hold then the fact that this zori is not a Fahrenheit hold. fact9: That this disparager is not a Anemia hold. fact10: The fact that the jogger does not weed chattel hold. fact11: The flytrap is a kind of a Grenadian. fact12: That this disparager does not weed chattel and is not a Grenadian does not hold. fact13: This disparager is not aeromechanic. fact14: The fact that the fact that this zori is a Chartres but it is not a Broadway does not hold is true. fact15: That this zori does not weed chattel and is not a Anemia is false. fact16: This disparager is not a Grenadian if that this zori is a ii but that thing is not a Fahrenheit is not correct.

fact1: ¬{CE}{b} fact2: ¬(¬{A}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) -> ¬{AA}{b} fact3: ¬(¬{AB}{b} & ¬{FT}{b}) fact4: ¬({A}{a} & ¬{AA}{a}) fact5: (x): {D}x -> ¬({C}x & ¬{B}x) fact6: ¬{AA}{b} -> {A}{a} fact7: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) -> ¬{AB}{b} fact8: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact9: ¬{AB}{b} fact10: ¬{AA}{je} fact11: {A}{fc} fact12: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) fact13: ¬{DR}{b} fact14: ¬({M}{a} & ¬{DN}{a}) fact15: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact16: ¬({C}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> ¬{A}{b}

This disparager is not a kind of a Grenadian.

¬{A}{b}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This disparager is not a kind of a recombinant. fact2: This disparager does not weed chattel if that it is not a Grenadian and is not a Anemia is false. fact3: That this disparager is not a Anemia and does not wince acousticophobia is wrong. fact4: The fact that this zori is a Grenadian that does not weed chattel is wrong. fact5: If something is a Mbabane the fact that that the thing is a ii but not a Fahrenheit hold does not hold. fact6: If that this disparager does not weed chattel hold this zori is a Grenadian. fact7: If that this disparager does not weed chattel and is not a Grenadian does not hold this disparager is not a Anemia. fact8: If the fact that this zori does not weed chattel and it is not a Anemia does not hold then the fact that this zori is not a Fahrenheit hold. fact9: That this disparager is not a Anemia hold. fact10: The fact that the jogger does not weed chattel hold. fact11: The flytrap is a kind of a Grenadian. fact12: That this disparager does not weed chattel and is not a Grenadian does not hold. fact13: This disparager is not aeromechanic. fact14: The fact that the fact that this zori is a Chartres but it is not a Broadway does not hold is true. fact15: That this zori does not weed chattel and is not a Anemia is false. fact16: This disparager is not a Grenadian if that this zori is a ii but that thing is not a Fahrenheit is not correct. ; $hypothesis$ = This disparager is a Grenadian. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That broadbandness does not happens.

¬{C}

fact1: That banging happens. fact2: That that Degasing Pseudemys does not happens causes that this ninepins and this ritual happens. fact3: That broadbandness occurs if that Degasing Pseudemys occurs. fact4: That notthis downtown but that broadbandness happens is false if that Degasing Pseudemys does not occurs. fact5: That that Degasing Pseudemys and this non-broadbandness occurs is triggered by that this downtown does not happens. fact6: This downtown happens. fact7: This carbonating Dacrymyces occurs and that Degasing Pseudemys happens if this downtown does not happens.

fact1: {IO} fact2: ¬{A} -> ({AO} & {O}) fact3: {A} -> {C} fact4: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{B} & {C}) fact5: ¬{B} -> ({A} & ¬{C}) fact6: {B} fact7: ¬{B} -> ({DS} & {A})

That broadbandness does not happens.

¬{C}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That banging happens. fact2: That that Degasing Pseudemys does not happens causes that this ninepins and this ritual happens. fact3: That broadbandness occurs if that Degasing Pseudemys occurs. fact4: That notthis downtown but that broadbandness happens is false if that Degasing Pseudemys does not occurs. fact5: That that Degasing Pseudemys and this non-broadbandness occurs is triggered by that this downtown does not happens. fact6: This downtown happens. fact7: This carbonating Dacrymyces occurs and that Degasing Pseudemys happens if this downtown does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That broadbandness does not happens. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That subcorticalness happens.

{B}

fact1: That this delicateness and that non-ceremoniousness occurs is caused by that that abasement does not occurs. fact2: If the chiseled does not happens then that bustling Limicolae happens. fact3: If that rabbinicness does not occurs that that subcorticalness happens and this dizygoticness happens does not hold. fact4: That both that non-ceremoniousness and that non-delicateness occurs results in that non-rabbinicness. fact5: If that rabbinicness does not occurs that that non-dizygoticness and/or that non-wrinkliness occurs does not hold. fact6: If this swage does not occurs then the whitecap happens. fact7: If that that that subcorticalness occurs and this dizygoticness happens is true is not true then that that subcorticalness does not happens is true. fact8: That subcorticalness does not occurs if that either that non-dizygoticness or that non-wrinkliness or both happens is wrong. fact9: That that abasement occurs hold if the fact that that abasement does not occurs and that wrinkliness does not happens is false. fact10: That rabbinicness is prevented by that this delicateness occurs and this ceremoniousness does not happens. fact11: That that wrinkliness does not occurs hold. fact12: If that rabbinicness does not occurs then that this dizygoticness happens and that wrinkliness occurs is incorrect. fact13: That both that rabbinicness and this ceremoniousness happens is false if this delicateness does not occurs. fact14: This overflowing cattie does not happens if the fact that both this overflowing cattie and this complimenting happens is not right. fact15: That the Anchorage occurs hold. fact16: This delicateness does not happens if that abasement does not happens but this overflowing cattie occurs. fact17: That that abasement does not happens and that wrinkliness does not occurs does not hold if that subcorticalness does not happens. fact18: The clowning happens. fact19: If that that rabbinicness and this ceremoniousness happens is incorrect then that rabbinicness does not occurs. fact20: The unmournedness occurs if that preachment does not occurs. fact21: That this overflowing cattie does not happens triggers that that non-ceremoniousness and that non-delicateness occurs. fact22: That subcorticalness happens if that wrinkliness does not happens.

fact1: ¬{G} -> ({E} & ¬{F}) fact2: ¬{EB} -> {DS} fact3: ¬{D} -> ¬({B} & {C}) fact4: (¬{F} & ¬{E}) -> ¬{D} fact5: ¬{D} -> ¬(¬{C} v ¬{A}) fact6: ¬{N} -> {HE} fact7: ¬({B} & {C}) -> ¬{B} fact8: ¬(¬{C} v ¬{A}) -> ¬{B} fact9: ¬(¬{G} & ¬{A}) -> {G} fact10: ({E} & ¬{F}) -> ¬{D} fact11: ¬{A} fact12: ¬{D} -> ¬({C} & {A}) fact13: ¬{E} -> ¬({D} & {F}) fact14: ¬({H} & {I}) -> ¬{H} fact15: {BS} fact16: (¬{G} & {H}) -> ¬{E} fact17: ¬{B} -> ¬(¬{G} & ¬{A}) fact18: {HB} fact19: ¬({D} & {F}) -> ¬{D} fact20: ¬{ES} -> {BQ} fact21: ¬{H} -> (¬{F} & ¬{E}) fact22: ¬{A} -> {B}

That that abasement occurs is correct.

{G}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That this delicateness and that non-ceremoniousness occurs is caused by that that abasement does not occurs. fact2: If the chiseled does not happens then that bustling Limicolae happens. fact3: If that rabbinicness does not occurs that that subcorticalness happens and this dizygoticness happens does not hold. fact4: That both that non-ceremoniousness and that non-delicateness occurs results in that non-rabbinicness. fact5: If that rabbinicness does not occurs that that non-dizygoticness and/or that non-wrinkliness occurs does not hold. fact6: If this swage does not occurs then the whitecap happens. fact7: If that that that subcorticalness occurs and this dizygoticness happens is true is not true then that that subcorticalness does not happens is true. fact8: That subcorticalness does not occurs if that either that non-dizygoticness or that non-wrinkliness or both happens is wrong. fact9: That that abasement occurs hold if the fact that that abasement does not occurs and that wrinkliness does not happens is false. fact10: That rabbinicness is prevented by that this delicateness occurs and this ceremoniousness does not happens. fact11: That that wrinkliness does not occurs hold. fact12: If that rabbinicness does not occurs then that this dizygoticness happens and that wrinkliness occurs is incorrect. fact13: That both that rabbinicness and this ceremoniousness happens is false if this delicateness does not occurs. fact14: This overflowing cattie does not happens if the fact that both this overflowing cattie and this complimenting happens is not right. fact15: That the Anchorage occurs hold. fact16: This delicateness does not happens if that abasement does not happens but this overflowing cattie occurs. fact17: That that abasement does not happens and that wrinkliness does not occurs does not hold if that subcorticalness does not happens. fact18: The clowning happens. fact19: If that that rabbinicness and this ceremoniousness happens is incorrect then that rabbinicness does not occurs. fact20: The unmournedness occurs if that preachment does not occurs. fact21: That this overflowing cattie does not happens triggers that that non-ceremoniousness and that non-delicateness occurs. fact22: That subcorticalness happens if that wrinkliness does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That subcorticalness happens. ; $proof$ =

fact22 & fact11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This homeotherm is not creative.

¬{AB}{b}

fact1: This homeotherm is nonconductive. fact2: If that that ultrasound is inextensible but it is not nonrandom is right then that epicarp is not creative. fact3: That ultrasound is not nonrandom. fact4: If something does superscribe methodicalness then the fact that it is inextensible and it is not nonrandom does not hold. fact5: This homeotherm is not nonrandom. fact6: If that ultrasound is not nonrandom this homeotherm is nonconductive thing that is creative. fact7: If this bantam is a immaculateness but it does not superscribe methodicalness that ultrasound does superscribe methodicalness. fact8: That ultrasound is not a kind of a GAD but this person is conductive. fact9: This homeotherm is not conductive if that ultrasound is not nonrandom. fact10: That pyrene is conductive. fact11: This bantam is a immaculateness that does not superscribe methodicalness if this antiquark is not ferrous. fact12: If that meniscus reproduces either it is not ferrous or it is not planographic or both.

fact1: ¬{AA}{b} fact2: ({B}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) -> ¬{AB}{cg} fact3: ¬{A}{a} fact4: (x): {C}x -> ¬({B}x & ¬{A}x) fact5: ¬{A}{b} fact6: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact7: ({E}{c} & ¬{C}{c}) -> {C}{a} fact8: (¬{IE}{a} & {AA}{a}) fact9: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{AA}{b} fact10: {AA}{hd} fact11: ¬{D}{d} -> ({E}{c} & ¬{C}{c}) fact12: {F}{e} -> (¬{D}{e} v ¬{G}{e})

This homeotherm is not creative.

¬{AB}{b}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This homeotherm is nonconductive. fact2: If that that ultrasound is inextensible but it is not nonrandom is right then that epicarp is not creative. fact3: That ultrasound is not nonrandom. fact4: If something does superscribe methodicalness then the fact that it is inextensible and it is not nonrandom does not hold. fact5: This homeotherm is not nonrandom. fact6: If that ultrasound is not nonrandom this homeotherm is nonconductive thing that is creative. fact7: If this bantam is a immaculateness but it does not superscribe methodicalness that ultrasound does superscribe methodicalness. fact8: That ultrasound is not a kind of a GAD but this person is conductive. fact9: This homeotherm is not conductive if that ultrasound is not nonrandom. fact10: That pyrene is conductive. fact11: This bantam is a immaculateness that does not superscribe methodicalness if this antiquark is not ferrous. fact12: If that meniscus reproduces either it is not ferrous or it is not planographic or both. ; $hypothesis$ = This homeotherm is not creative. ; $proof$ =

fact6 & fact3 -> int1: This homeotherm is nonconductive one that is creative.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

The fact that that streetlight is a kind of a IDF or is not a OB or both is false.

¬({B}{a} v ¬{C}{a})

fact1: That streetlight is a OB. fact2: There is someone such that that one shatters. fact3: If someone shatters the fact that that streetlight is a IDF and/or he is not a kind of a OB is wrong.

fact1: {C}{a} fact2: (Ex): {A}x fact3: (x): {A}x -> ¬({B}{a} v ¬{C}{a})

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: That streetlight is a OB. fact2: There is someone such that that one shatters. fact3: If someone shatters the fact that that streetlight is a IDF and/or he is not a kind of a OB is wrong. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that streetlight is a kind of a IDF or is not a OB or both is false. ; $proof$ =

fact2 & fact3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

Yvette is a savorlessness.

{B}{a}

fact1: Yvette is not a savorlessness if the fact that Yvette does not scrutinize Cupid and is not non-actinic is not right. fact2: The fact that Yvette does not scrutinize Cupid but this is actinic does not hold. fact3: Yvette is a savorlessness if this pentimento is ectodermal. fact4: If the fact that someone skips mi is correct this one is ectodermal. fact5: The fact that somebody does not pelt Homel but it is actinic is incorrect if it is not ectodermal. fact6: If this Creator is cognisable but he/she is not fiducial then this pentimento is humorous. fact7: Someone does skip mi if it is humorous one that is not a twinkle.

fact1: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact2: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact3: {A}{b} -> {B}{a} fact4: (x): {C}x -> {A}x fact5: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{EK}x & {AB}x) fact6: ({F}{c} & ¬{G}{c}) -> {E}{b} fact7: (x): ({E}x & ¬{D}x) -> {C}x

The fact that that that viands does not pelt Homel but that person is actinic hold does not hold.

¬(¬{EK}{hf} & {AB}{hf})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Yvette is not a savorlessness if the fact that Yvette does not scrutinize Cupid and is not non-actinic is not right. fact2: The fact that Yvette does not scrutinize Cupid but this is actinic does not hold. fact3: Yvette is a savorlessness if this pentimento is ectodermal. fact4: If the fact that someone skips mi is correct this one is ectodermal. fact5: The fact that somebody does not pelt Homel but it is actinic is incorrect if it is not ectodermal. fact6: If this Creator is cognisable but he/she is not fiducial then this pentimento is humorous. fact7: Someone does skip mi if it is humorous one that is not a twinkle. ; $hypothesis$ = Yvette is a savorlessness. ; $proof$ =

fact1 & fact2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That this assenting Ratibida occurs is not incorrect.

{D}

fact1: The uglifying Umbrina happens. fact2: If that timing and/or the comeback happens the mooning does not occurs. fact3: That this installing stretchiness occurs prevents that this stomatalness does not happens. fact4: The lionising Utu does not happens. fact5: The standing does not occurs. fact6: The fact that this whiz occurs is correct. fact7: If either this stomatalness happens or this snarfing Euphagus happens or both then the fact that this assenting Ratibida does not occurs hold. fact8: This installing stretchiness happens. fact9: The gustativeness and/or that tribalisation happens. fact10: This snarfing Euphagus causes that this stomatalness occurs and this installing stretchiness does not happens. fact11: That bleep occurs. fact12: That this assenting Ratibida does not occurs is prevented by that this stomatalness but notthis installing stretchiness happens. fact13: Either this awaking acerbity occurs or that tearing happens or both. fact14: If this snarfing Euphagus happens this assenting Ratibida does not happens. fact15: That bribery does not happens. fact16: If this stakes does not occurs then this snarfing Euphagus occurs and this cardiopulmonariness happens. fact17: The alligatoreding happens.

fact1: {AA} fact2: ({BK} v {CP}) -> ¬{IL} fact3: {A} -> {B} fact4: ¬{DC} fact5: ¬{DL} fact6: {GL} fact7: ({B} v {C}) -> ¬{D} fact8: {A} fact9: ({GA} v {BA}) fact10: {C} -> ({B} & ¬{A}) fact11: {BT} fact12: ({B} & ¬{A}) -> {D} fact13: ({GC} v {IC}) fact14: {C} -> ¬{D} fact15: ¬{DE} fact16: ¬{F} -> ({C} & {E}) fact17: {CA}

That this assenting Ratibida occurs is not incorrect.

{D}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The uglifying Umbrina happens. fact2: If that timing and/or the comeback happens the mooning does not occurs. fact3: That this installing stretchiness occurs prevents that this stomatalness does not happens. fact4: The lionising Utu does not happens. fact5: The standing does not occurs. fact6: The fact that this whiz occurs is correct. fact7: If either this stomatalness happens or this snarfing Euphagus happens or both then the fact that this assenting Ratibida does not occurs hold. fact8: This installing stretchiness happens. fact9: The gustativeness and/or that tribalisation happens. fact10: This snarfing Euphagus causes that this stomatalness occurs and this installing stretchiness does not happens. fact11: That bleep occurs. fact12: That this assenting Ratibida does not occurs is prevented by that this stomatalness but notthis installing stretchiness happens. fact13: Either this awaking acerbity occurs or that tearing happens or both. fact14: If this snarfing Euphagus happens this assenting Ratibida does not happens. fact15: That bribery does not happens. fact16: If this stakes does not occurs then this snarfing Euphagus occurs and this cardiopulmonariness happens. fact17: The alligatoreding happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That this assenting Ratibida occurs is not incorrect. ; $proof$ =

fact3 & fact8 -> int1: This stomatalness happens.; int1 -> int2: This stomatalness occurs or this snarfing Euphagus occurs or both.; int2 & fact7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That tearlessness happens.

{C}

fact1: If the fact that that byplay does not occurs and that transeuntness does not happens is not true that transeuntness occurs. fact2: This Hero happens. fact3: If that gravure does not happens then this flirtation and that drifting happens. fact4: That admittance does not occurs if that that crouch does not happens or this findingsing Corynebacteriaceae does not occurs or both is wrong. fact5: That trampling companionability occurs and that biblioticness happens if that admittance does not happens. fact6: That both this vaunting and this domineering Nefertiti occurs is triggered by that this tote does not happens. fact7: If this debauching Becquerel happens the fact that either that crouch does not occurs or this findingsing Corynebacteriaceae does not occurs or both is false. fact8: That this flirtation occurs brings about that this tote does not happens. fact9: This snookering privilege does not occurs. fact10: This Hero does not happens and/or this overgorging does not occurs if that transeuntness happens. fact11: The fact that that byplay does not occurs and that transeuntness does not happens is false if this vaunting occurs. fact12: The tearfulness is caused by that both this Hero and this overgorging occurs. fact13: That trampling companionability and/or that that gravure does not happens prevents that gravure. fact14: This overgorging occurs. fact15: If this Hero does not occurs then that tearlessness happens.

fact1: ¬(¬{E} & ¬{D}) -> {D} fact2: {A} fact3: ¬{K} -> ({I} & {J}) fact4: ¬(¬{O} v ¬{P}) -> ¬{N} fact5: ¬{N} -> ({M} & {L}) fact6: ¬{H} -> ({F} & {G}) fact7: {Q} -> ¬(¬{O} v ¬{P}) fact8: {I} -> ¬{H} fact9: ¬{IM} fact10: {D} -> (¬{A} v ¬{B}) fact11: {F} -> ¬(¬{E} & ¬{D}) fact12: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} fact13: ({M} v ¬{K}) -> ¬{K} fact14: {B} fact15: ¬{A} -> {C}

That tearlessness happens.

{C}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If the fact that that byplay does not occurs and that transeuntness does not happens is not true that transeuntness occurs. fact2: This Hero happens. fact3: If that gravure does not happens then this flirtation and that drifting happens. fact4: That admittance does not occurs if that that crouch does not happens or this findingsing Corynebacteriaceae does not occurs or both is wrong. fact5: That trampling companionability occurs and that biblioticness happens if that admittance does not happens. fact6: That both this vaunting and this domineering Nefertiti occurs is triggered by that this tote does not happens. fact7: If this debauching Becquerel happens the fact that either that crouch does not occurs or this findingsing Corynebacteriaceae does not occurs or both is false. fact8: That this flirtation occurs brings about that this tote does not happens. fact9: This snookering privilege does not occurs. fact10: This Hero does not happens and/or this overgorging does not occurs if that transeuntness happens. fact11: The fact that that byplay does not occurs and that transeuntness does not happens is false if this vaunting occurs. fact12: The tearfulness is caused by that both this Hero and this overgorging occurs. fact13: That trampling companionability and/or that that gravure does not happens prevents that gravure. fact14: This overgorging occurs. fact15: If this Hero does not occurs then that tearlessness happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That tearlessness happens. ; $proof$ =

fact2 & fact14 -> int1: This Hero occurs and this overgorging happens.; int1 & fact12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

The fact that that fare does not imagine Aegates and is not a Burgoyne is incorrect.

¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa})

fact1: The fact that somebody imagines Aegates but the one is not a Burgoyne does not hold if the one is not a paleozoology. fact2: That fare is a kind of a cardiogram. fact3: If that fare is not a paleozoology that that fare does not imagine Aegates but that is a Burgoyne is incorrect. fact4: The fact that something does not imagine Aegates and is not a kind of a Burgoyne does not hold if it is not a paleozoology. fact5: That some person does not imagine Aegates but it is a Burgoyne is incorrect if it is not a kind of a paleozoology. fact6: The fact that this ruby is not a netted and it does not comb Tirana does not hold. fact7: That fare is a cardiogram but it is not managerial. fact8: That fare is not a paleozoology if that fare is a cardiogram but not managerial.

fact1: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact2: {C}{aa} fact3: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) fact4: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact5: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) fact6: ¬(¬{GE}{bh} & ¬{AH}{bh}) fact7: ({C}{aa} & ¬{B}{aa}) fact8: ({C}{aa} & ¬{B}{aa}) -> ¬{A}{aa}

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that somebody imagines Aegates but the one is not a Burgoyne does not hold if the one is not a paleozoology. fact2: That fare is a kind of a cardiogram. fact3: If that fare is not a paleozoology that that fare does not imagine Aegates but that is a Burgoyne is incorrect. fact4: The fact that something does not imagine Aegates and is not a kind of a Burgoyne does not hold if it is not a paleozoology. fact5: That some person does not imagine Aegates but it is a Burgoyne is incorrect if it is not a kind of a paleozoology. fact6: The fact that this ruby is not a netted and it does not comb Tirana does not hold. fact7: That fare is a cardiogram but it is not managerial. fact8: That fare is not a paleozoology if that fare is a cardiogram but not managerial. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that fare does not imagine Aegates and is not a Burgoyne is incorrect. ; $proof$ =

fact4 -> int1: The fact that that fare does not imagine Aegates and is not a Burgoyne is incorrect if the thing is not a paleozoology.; fact8 & fact7 -> int2: That fare is not a paleozoology.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

The fact that the fact that that utilitarian does not equilibrate and is not a startling is true does not hold.

¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a})

fact1: If that utilitarian does not equilibrate and it is not a startling that battlefield is not a kind of a spin. fact2: The fact that something is not a heartsickness and it does not currycomb castrated is incorrect if it is not a kind of a Tchaikovsky. fact3: That battlefield is not a spin if that utilitarian equilibrates and is not a startling. fact4: Some person that does not journey keratectasia does abuse odynophagia and does desist. fact5: The fact that that utilitarian dissertates tan but it is not a kind of a Pecos is incorrect. fact6: That that battlefield is not a Tatum and the one is not educational is wrong. fact7: That battlefield is both not a startling and not a subordinating. fact8: Everything does not journey keratectasia and does not queer epididymitis. fact9: If this hummingbird does not abuse odynophagia then that battlefield is a Tchaikovsky and is a spin. fact10: That utilitarian is a kind of a Tchaikovsky that does not equilibrate if there exists something such that it is a Tchaikovsky. fact11: That battlefield is a spin that is a Tchaikovsky. fact12: The spectrometer is not a Tchaikovsky.

fact1: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact2: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{FT}x & ¬{GC}x) fact3: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact4: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({C}x & {D}x) fact5: ¬({BK}{a} & ¬{GG}{a}) fact6: ¬(¬{GT}{b} & ¬{ET}{b}) fact7: (¬{AB}{b} & ¬{AH}{b}) fact8: (x): (¬{E}x & ¬{F}x) fact9: ¬{C}{c} -> ({A}{b} & {B}{b}) fact10: (x): {A}x -> ({A}{a} & ¬{AA}{a}) fact11: ({B}{b} & {A}{b}) fact12: ¬{A}{ci}

The fact that that battlefield is not a kind of a heartsickness and does not currycomb castrated is false.

¬(¬{FT}{b} & ¬{GC}{b})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that utilitarian does not equilibrate and it is not a startling that battlefield is not a kind of a spin. fact2: The fact that something is not a heartsickness and it does not currycomb castrated is incorrect if it is not a kind of a Tchaikovsky. fact3: That battlefield is not a spin if that utilitarian equilibrates and is not a startling. fact4: Some person that does not journey keratectasia does abuse odynophagia and does desist. fact5: The fact that that utilitarian dissertates tan but it is not a kind of a Pecos is incorrect. fact6: That that battlefield is not a Tatum and the one is not educational is wrong. fact7: That battlefield is both not a startling and not a subordinating. fact8: Everything does not journey keratectasia and does not queer epididymitis. fact9: If this hummingbird does not abuse odynophagia then that battlefield is a Tchaikovsky and is a spin. fact10: That utilitarian is a kind of a Tchaikovsky that does not equilibrate if there exists something such that it is a Tchaikovsky. fact11: That battlefield is a spin that is a Tchaikovsky. fact12: The spectrometer is not a Tchaikovsky. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that the fact that that utilitarian does not equilibrate and is not a startling is true does not hold. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that that utilitarian does not equilibrate and it is not a startling.; fact1 & assump1 -> int1: That battlefield is not a spin.; fact11 -> int2: That battlefield is a spin.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

The fact that this Imavate is electromagnetic is not wrong.

{B}{b}

fact1: This Imavate is Moslem one that is non-rhizomatous if Doris is not a determinateness. fact2: That someone is not electromagnetic if that one is Moslem and not rhizomatous is not false. fact3: Doris is not a determinateness. fact4: If some person is Moslem and is rhizomatous it is not electromagnetic.

fact1: ¬{A}{a} -> ({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact2: (x): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x fact3: ¬{A}{a} fact4: (x): ({AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x

DISPROVED

DISPROVED

$facts$ = fact1: This Imavate is Moslem one that is non-rhizomatous if Doris is not a determinateness. fact2: That someone is not electromagnetic if that one is Moslem and not rhizomatous is not false. fact3: Doris is not a determinateness. fact4: If some person is Moslem and is rhizomatous it is not electromagnetic. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that this Imavate is electromagnetic is not wrong. ; $proof$ =

fact1 & fact3 -> int1: This Imavate is both not non-Moslem and non-rhizomatous.; fact2 -> int2: This Imavate is not electromagnetic if it is both not non-Moslem and not rhizomatous.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

The fact that everything is a kind of a trusty is not right.

¬((x): {A}x)

fact1: Every man is a Moraceae. fact2: Every man warehouses neoplasm. fact3: Everything is not a Brasilia.

fact1: (x): {JF}x fact2: (x): {HA}x fact3: (x): ¬{B}x

Everybody does win solarisation.

(x): {F}x

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Every man is a Moraceae. fact2: Every man warehouses neoplasm. fact3: Everything is not a Brasilia. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that everything is a kind of a trusty is not right. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

The fact that this ovularness does not happens is right.

¬{B}

fact1: That that blueing does not occurs brings about that notthat varnishing but this ovularness happens. fact2: If this chirking does not occurs notthat blueing but that solidness occurs. fact3: This ovularness does not happens if that that varnishing does not occurs hold. fact4: The fact that this miaou and this churning occurs is incorrect if this concentrating does not happens. fact5: That that dooming occurs causes that notthis chirking but this guillotining offbeat occurs. fact6: That that blueing but notthat solidness happens is brought about by that this chirking does not occurs. fact7: If that this miaou occurs and this churning occurs is incorrect this churning does not happens. fact8: The resounding Mahan happens. fact9: The tutorialness happens. fact10: The enlightening Anthidium occurs if that the gleaming occurs is not false. fact11: That this churning does not occurs yields that that dooming occurs. fact12: If that both that Gaussianness and this concentrating occurs is incorrect then that this concentrating does not happens is right. fact13: If that blueing occurs but that solidness does not occurs that varnishing does not happens. fact14: That that varnishing does not happens leads to that the bivalveness occurs. fact15: If that cavalcade does not happens the fact that that Gaussianness and this concentrating happens does not hold. fact16: That equalling Kobenhavn occurs. fact17: This displeasing occurs. fact18: This ovularness happens if that varnishing occurs.

fact1: ¬{C} -> (¬{A} & {B}) fact2: ¬{E} -> (¬{C} & {D}) fact3: ¬{A} -> ¬{B} fact4: ¬{I} -> ¬({J} & {H}) fact5: {G} -> (¬{E} & {F}) fact6: ¬{E} -> ({C} & ¬{D}) fact7: ¬({J} & {H}) -> ¬{H} fact8: {GQ} fact9: {FA} fact10: {BP} -> {N} fact11: ¬{H} -> {G} fact12: ¬({K} & {I}) -> ¬{I} fact13: ({C} & ¬{D}) -> ¬{A} fact14: ¬{A} -> {DQ} fact15: ¬{L} -> ¬({K} & {I}) fact16: {CD} fact17: {AS} fact18: {A} -> {B}

The fact that this ovularness does not happens is right.

¬{B}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That that blueing does not occurs brings about that notthat varnishing but this ovularness happens. fact2: If this chirking does not occurs notthat blueing but that solidness occurs. fact3: This ovularness does not happens if that that varnishing does not occurs hold. fact4: The fact that this miaou and this churning occurs is incorrect if this concentrating does not happens. fact5: That that dooming occurs causes that notthis chirking but this guillotining offbeat occurs. fact6: That that blueing but notthat solidness happens is brought about by that this chirking does not occurs. fact7: If that this miaou occurs and this churning occurs is incorrect this churning does not happens. fact8: The resounding Mahan happens. fact9: The tutorialness happens. fact10: The enlightening Anthidium occurs if that the gleaming occurs is not false. fact11: That this churning does not occurs yields that that dooming occurs. fact12: If that both that Gaussianness and this concentrating occurs is incorrect then that this concentrating does not happens is right. fact13: If that blueing occurs but that solidness does not occurs that varnishing does not happens. fact14: That that varnishing does not happens leads to that the bivalveness occurs. fact15: If that cavalcade does not happens the fact that that Gaussianness and this concentrating happens does not hold. fact16: That equalling Kobenhavn occurs. fact17: This displeasing occurs. fact18: This ovularness happens if that varnishing occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that this ovularness does not happens is right. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That that depreciating currency and that recrudescing Athyrium occurs does not hold.

¬({C} & {A})

fact1: If this corpuscularness happens then that depreciating currency occurs. fact2: That recrudescing Athyrium and that cesarean happens. fact3: This corpuscularness happens.

fact1: {D} -> {C} fact2: ({A} & {B}) fact3: {D}

DISPROVED

DISPROVED

$facts$ = fact1: If this corpuscularness happens then that depreciating currency occurs. fact2: That recrudescing Athyrium and that cesarean happens. fact3: This corpuscularness happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That that depreciating currency and that recrudescing Athyrium occurs does not hold. ; $proof$ =

fact2 -> int1: That recrudescing Athyrium happens.; fact3 & fact1 -> int2: That depreciating currency happens.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That instigating Gluck does not occurs.

¬{C}

fact1: If this homozygousness and this unownedness occurs the fact that that instigating Gluck does not occurs hold. fact2: That the mischievousness occurs hold. fact3: That this homozygousness and the gyneolatry occurs is caused by that ownedness. fact4: The endoscopicness and the scheming occurs. fact5: This unownedness occurs. fact6: That instigating Gluck occurs and this homozygousness occurs if this unownedness does not occurs. fact7: This homozygousness happens.

fact1: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} fact2: {AH} fact3: ¬{B} -> ({A} & {ID}) fact4: ({IE} & {I}) fact5: {B} fact6: ¬{B} -> ({C} & {A}) fact7: {A}

The gyneolatry occurs.

{ID}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this homozygousness and this unownedness occurs the fact that that instigating Gluck does not occurs hold. fact2: That the mischievousness occurs hold. fact3: That this homozygousness and the gyneolatry occurs is caused by that ownedness. fact4: The endoscopicness and the scheming occurs. fact5: This unownedness occurs. fact6: That instigating Gluck occurs and this homozygousness occurs if this unownedness does not occurs. fact7: This homozygousness happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That instigating Gluck does not occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact7 & fact5 -> int1: Both this homozygousness and this unownedness happens.; int1 & fact1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That myna is not physicochemical.

¬{A}{a}

fact1: Something that does not banquet Brummagem is a Merrimac and is physicochemical. fact2: The fact that that myna is not a kind of a Merrimac is true if this exhibitor does not banquet Brummagem. fact3: The fact that that this exhibitor is a splotch and it banquets Brummagem does not hold hold. fact4: That myna is a Merrimac if that myna is physicochemical. fact5: If the fact that this Arkansan is not a kind of a usufructuary is true the fact that that ammo is not streptococcic is not incorrect. fact6: That shearer is both not a flecked and a cockney. fact7: This exhibitor banquets Brummagem if that Dr. banquets Brummagem. fact8: If that shearer is not a kind of a flecked but she is a cockney then this citrulline is not a cockney. fact9: That Dr. banquets Brummagem if this reductase is a splotch. fact10: Something is a kind of a splotch and the thing deters Hottonia if the fact that the thing is not resident is right. fact11: If that somebody is an illegitimate and does sellotape LLud is incorrect it is not an illegitimate. fact12: If some man is not streptococcic it does not keynote Louisiana and is not resident. fact13: If this exhibitor is a Merrimac then it is a kind of a splotch. fact14: If that ammo does not keynote Louisiana and is not resident then this reductase is not resident. fact15: If this citrulline is not a cockney then the fact that it is an illegitimate and it sellotapes LLud is wrong. fact16: That myna does not banquet Brummagem if this exhibitor does not banquet Brummagem and he/she is not a splotch. fact17: Some person is not a usufructuary if the fact that he/she does flutter and is anthropophagous is false. fact18: If this exhibitor deters Hottonia and is not resident this person does not banquet Brummagem. fact19: The fact that if that Dr. does not deter Hottonia then that Dr. is not a splotch and it does not banquet Brummagem is right. fact20: That myna is either physicochemical or not a Merrimac or both if that Dr. does not banquet Brummagem.

fact1: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({B}x & {A}x) fact2: ¬{C}{b} -> ¬{B}{a} fact3: ¬({D}{b} & {C}{b}) fact4: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} fact5: ¬{I}{f} -> ¬{G}{e} fact6: (¬{O}{h} & {N}{h}) fact7: {C}{c} -> {C}{b} fact8: (¬{O}{h} & {N}{h}) -> ¬{N}{g} fact9: {D}{d} -> {C}{c} fact10: (x): ¬{F}x -> ({D}x & {E}x) fact11: (x): ¬({L}x & {M}x) -> ¬{L}x fact12: (x): ¬{G}x -> (¬{H}x & ¬{F}x) fact13: {B}{b} -> {D}{b} fact14: (¬{H}{e} & ¬{F}{e}) -> ¬{F}{d} fact15: ¬{N}{g} -> ¬({L}{g} & {M}{g}) fact16: (¬{C}{b} & ¬{D}{b}) -> ¬{C}{a} fact17: (x): ¬({K}x & {J}x) -> ¬{I}x fact18: ({E}{b} & ¬{F}{b}) -> ¬{C}{b} fact19: ¬{E}{c} -> (¬{D}{c} & ¬{C}{c}) fact20: ¬{C}{c} -> ({A}{a} v ¬{B}{a})

Let's assume that that myna is physicochemical.

{A}{a}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Something that does not banquet Brummagem is a Merrimac and is physicochemical. fact2: The fact that that myna is not a kind of a Merrimac is true if this exhibitor does not banquet Brummagem. fact3: The fact that that this exhibitor is a splotch and it banquets Brummagem does not hold hold. fact4: That myna is a Merrimac if that myna is physicochemical. fact5: If the fact that this Arkansan is not a kind of a usufructuary is true the fact that that ammo is not streptococcic is not incorrect. fact6: That shearer is both not a flecked and a cockney. fact7: This exhibitor banquets Brummagem if that Dr. banquets Brummagem. fact8: If that shearer is not a kind of a flecked but she is a cockney then this citrulline is not a cockney. fact9: That Dr. banquets Brummagem if this reductase is a splotch. fact10: Something is a kind of a splotch and the thing deters Hottonia if the fact that the thing is not resident is right. fact11: If that somebody is an illegitimate and does sellotape LLud is incorrect it is not an illegitimate. fact12: If some man is not streptococcic it does not keynote Louisiana and is not resident. fact13: If this exhibitor is a Merrimac then it is a kind of a splotch. fact14: If that ammo does not keynote Louisiana and is not resident then this reductase is not resident. fact15: If this citrulline is not a cockney then the fact that it is an illegitimate and it sellotapes LLud is wrong. fact16: That myna does not banquet Brummagem if this exhibitor does not banquet Brummagem and he/she is not a splotch. fact17: Some person is not a usufructuary if the fact that he/she does flutter and is anthropophagous is false. fact18: If this exhibitor deters Hottonia and is not resident this person does not banquet Brummagem. fact19: The fact that if that Dr. does not deter Hottonia then that Dr. is not a splotch and it does not banquet Brummagem is right. fact20: That myna is either physicochemical or not a Merrimac or both if that Dr. does not banquet Brummagem. ; $hypothesis$ = That myna is not physicochemical. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That Malthusian is not echt.

¬{AB}{a}

fact1: That Malthusian is a kind of a Mastigoproctus. fact2: That Malthusian shorts crocked. fact3: That Malthusian is a Lozier and an imbroglio. fact4: If that Malthusian is not a Marsilea then that Malthusian is a Mastigoproctus. fact5: If that Malthusian is not a kind of a Marsilea then she/he is a Mastigoproctus and not non-echt. fact6: That Malthusian is echt and that thing is achenial if that Malthusian does not tolerate sceptre. fact7: The peony is a kind of a Carduelis and it is a Marsilea. fact8: This tanglebush is a disrepair and echt. fact9: That Malthusian is not a Hayes. fact10: If some person is a Orcus it is a kind of a Marsilea and is not echt. fact11: That limnologist is a Mastigoproctus and it is a salesmanship if it is not a hospitableness. fact12: That Malthusian is both Seychellois and echt if he/she is not a lingam. fact13: The Serbian forces agendum and it reclines Daubentoniidae if it is not convenient. fact14: If that cardroom is not a Marsilea then that cardroom is idiographic and it is inoffensive. fact15: The feldspar is non-echt.

fact1: {AA}{a} fact2: {GA}{a} fact3: ({AD}{a} & {FL}{a}) fact4: ¬{A}{a} -> {AA}{a} fact5: ¬{A}{a} -> ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact6: ¬{DI}{a} -> ({AB}{a} & {GU}{a}) fact7: ({GP}{d} & {A}{d}) fact8: ({HK}{as} & {AB}{as}) fact9: ¬{AU}{a} fact10: (x): {B}x -> ({A}x & ¬{AB}x) fact11: ¬{BL}{if} -> ({AA}{if} & {FT}{if}) fact12: ¬{BO}{a} -> ({GT}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact13: ¬{IE}{bj} -> ({DB}{bj} & {HU}{bj}) fact14: ¬{A}{bh} -> ({HC}{bh} & {FJ}{bh}) fact15: ¬{AB}{gt}

That Malthusian is not echt.

¬{AB}{a}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That Malthusian is a kind of a Mastigoproctus. fact2: That Malthusian shorts crocked. fact3: That Malthusian is a Lozier and an imbroglio. fact4: If that Malthusian is not a Marsilea then that Malthusian is a Mastigoproctus. fact5: If that Malthusian is not a kind of a Marsilea then she/he is a Mastigoproctus and not non-echt. fact6: That Malthusian is echt and that thing is achenial if that Malthusian does not tolerate sceptre. fact7: The peony is a kind of a Carduelis and it is a Marsilea. fact8: This tanglebush is a disrepair and echt. fact9: That Malthusian is not a Hayes. fact10: If some person is a Orcus it is a kind of a Marsilea and is not echt. fact11: That limnologist is a Mastigoproctus and it is a salesmanship if it is not a hospitableness. fact12: That Malthusian is both Seychellois and echt if he/she is not a lingam. fact13: The Serbian forces agendum and it reclines Daubentoniidae if it is not convenient. fact14: If that cardroom is not a Marsilea then that cardroom is idiographic and it is inoffensive. fact15: The feldspar is non-echt. ; $hypothesis$ = That Malthusian is not echt. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That quoits does not happens.

¬{AA}

fact1: If that integrativeness occurs that Macedonianness happens. fact2: That that pupping does not occurs and this collecting effortfulness does not occurs is triggered by that Macedonianness. fact3: That this bisontineness does not happens yields that that vexing Genista occurs and this devaluing does not occurs. fact4: The prance does not occurs. fact5: If this unsweptness happens this costing phyle occurs. fact6: The fact that if the fact that this contrivance does not happens hold this vesicating duo occurs is correct. fact7: That integrativeness happens if the fact that that squelching happens and that integrativeness does not happens is not correct. fact8: The fact that this vesicating duo happens is correct. fact9: If this bisontineness does not occurs this devaluing occurs and that vexing Genista occurs. fact10: If this devaluing does not occurs then the fact that that squelching but notthat integrativeness happens is false. fact11: That Macedonianness is prevented by that that squelching does not happens and that integrativeness does not occurs. fact12: If this contrivance does not occurs then that quoits does not happens but this vesicating duo happens. fact13: If this unprovocativeness does not happens then that quoits and this contrivance occurs. fact14: This provocativeness is caused by this collecting effortfulness. fact15: That broiling happens. fact16: If that broiling but notthe prance happens this unsweptness happens. fact17: That that squelching does not occurs and that integrativeness does not happens is caused by that this devaluing happens. fact18: That this potshot does not occurs but the happenstance occurs is triggered by that this contrivance happens. fact19: If this conveying Tappan does not happens that that adulterating Marengo does not happens or that spleneticness does not happens or both hold. fact20: This conveying Tappan is prevented by that this costing phyle occurs and/or that this imperialism does not occurs. fact21: That non-Macedonianness results in that this collecting effortfulness and that pupping happens.

fact1: {F} -> {E} fact2: {E} -> (¬{D} & ¬{C}) fact3: ¬{J} -> ({I} & ¬{H}) fact4: ¬{Q} fact5: {P} -> {N} fact6: ¬{A} -> {AB} fact7: ¬({G} & ¬{F}) -> {F} fact8: {AB} fact9: ¬{J} -> ({H} & {I}) fact10: ¬{H} -> ¬({G} & ¬{F}) fact11: (¬{G} & ¬{F}) -> ¬{E} fact12: ¬{A} -> (¬{AA} & {AB}) fact13: ¬{B} -> ({AA} & {A}) fact14: {C} -> ¬{B} fact15: {R} fact16: ({R} & ¬{Q}) -> {P} fact17: {H} -> (¬{G} & ¬{F}) fact18: {A} -> (¬{FF} & {DQ}) fact19: ¬{M} -> (¬{L} v ¬{K}) fact20: ({N} v ¬{O}) -> ¬{M} fact21: ¬{E} -> ({C} & {D})

Notthis potshot but the happenstance happens.

(¬{FF} & {DQ})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that integrativeness occurs that Macedonianness happens. fact2: That that pupping does not occurs and this collecting effortfulness does not occurs is triggered by that Macedonianness. fact3: That this bisontineness does not happens yields that that vexing Genista occurs and this devaluing does not occurs. fact4: The prance does not occurs. fact5: If this unsweptness happens this costing phyle occurs. fact6: The fact that if the fact that this contrivance does not happens hold this vesicating duo occurs is correct. fact7: That integrativeness happens if the fact that that squelching happens and that integrativeness does not happens is not correct. fact8: The fact that this vesicating duo happens is correct. fact9: If this bisontineness does not occurs this devaluing occurs and that vexing Genista occurs. fact10: If this devaluing does not occurs then the fact that that squelching but notthat integrativeness happens is false. fact11: That Macedonianness is prevented by that that squelching does not happens and that integrativeness does not occurs. fact12: If this contrivance does not occurs then that quoits does not happens but this vesicating duo happens. fact13: If this unprovocativeness does not happens then that quoits and this contrivance occurs. fact14: This provocativeness is caused by this collecting effortfulness. fact15: That broiling happens. fact16: If that broiling but notthe prance happens this unsweptness happens. fact17: That that squelching does not occurs and that integrativeness does not happens is caused by that this devaluing happens. fact18: That this potshot does not occurs but the happenstance occurs is triggered by that this contrivance happens. fact19: If this conveying Tappan does not happens that that adulterating Marengo does not happens or that spleneticness does not happens or both hold. fact20: This conveying Tappan is prevented by that this costing phyle occurs and/or that this imperialism does not occurs. fact21: That non-Macedonianness results in that this collecting effortfulness and that pupping happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That quoits does not happens. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That that stephanotis is afferent hold.

{B}{aa}

fact1: If somebody is not manageable but she is a laudableness she is not afferent. fact2: That stephanotis is not manageable and is a kind of a laudableness if it is not a noble. fact3: The fact that that stephanotis is not a kind of a noble hold.

fact1: (x): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x fact2: ¬{A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) fact3: ¬{A}{aa}

DISPROVED

DISPROVED

$facts$ = fact1: If somebody is not manageable but she is a laudableness she is not afferent. fact2: That stephanotis is not manageable and is a kind of a laudableness if it is not a noble. fact3: The fact that that stephanotis is not a kind of a noble hold. ; $hypothesis$ = That that stephanotis is afferent hold. ; $proof$ =

fact1 -> int1: If that stephanotis is not manageable but she/he is a laudableness then she/he is not afferent.; fact2 & fact3 -> int2: That stephanotis is not manageable but the thing is a laudableness.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

The fact that this lomustine is not a cgs and it does not crossbreed does not hold.

¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a})

fact1: The fact that this wintergreen is a pair but the thing does not sum boogie does not hold if Brian is not a kind of a Andricus. fact2: The fact that Brian does not crossbreed and is not axonal is wrong. fact3: The fact that this lomustine is not a cgs and it does not crossbreed does not hold if this wintergreen is not a cgs. fact4: If Brian is a Andricus then this lomustine is a Andricus. fact5: Someone is not a Andricus if it is a pair. fact6: If some man is a Andricus the one is not a cgs and does not crossbreed. fact7: The fact that Brian is not a kind of a Andricus hold. fact8: The fact that the fact that this lomustine is a cgs but the thing does not sum boogie is true is wrong. fact9: The fact that this lomustine is both not a cgs and a pair does not hold. fact10: If Brian is not a Andricus then that this wintergreen is a kind of a Andricus and does not sum boogie does not hold. fact11: If this wintergreen is a Andricus this wintergreen is not a pair. fact12: If the fact that something is a pair but it does not sum boogie is wrong the fact that it is not a cgs is correct. fact13: That this wintergreen sums boogie and does not crossbreed is false. fact14: If this wintergreen is not a pair that this lomustine crossbreeds and does sum boogie is not correct. fact15: This nag is not a cgs. fact16: If this wintergreen does not sum boogie then the fact that this lomustine is both a cgs and a Andricus is not true. fact17: The fact that this wintergreen is not a pair and it does not crossbreed does not hold. fact18: The fact that this wintergreen is not a Andricus but that person is a kind of a cgs is false if this lomustine is not a kind of a Andricus. fact19: If the fact that that this troll is both not a Strelitzia and isomorphic is incorrect is right the thing is not isomorphic. fact20: If this lomustine does not crossbreed then the fact that this wintergreen does not crossbreed but it is a kind of a cgs does not hold. fact21: If Brian is not a cgs then the fact that this wintergreen is a Andricus and it crossbreeds is incorrect. fact22: Something Downs glomerulonephritis or that thing is a hepatomegaly or both if the fact that that thing is not isomorphic is true. fact23: That Brian is a cgs but this thing is not a Andricus is not correct.

fact1: ¬{A}{b} -> ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) fact2: ¬(¬{C}{b} & ¬{DS}{b}) fact3: ¬{B}{aa} -> ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) fact4: {A}{b} -> {A}{a} fact5: (x): {AA}x -> ¬{A}x fact6: (x): {A}x -> (¬{B}x & ¬{C}x) fact7: ¬{A}{b} fact8: ¬({B}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact9: ¬(¬{B}{a} & {AA}{a}) fact10: ¬{A}{b} -> ¬({A}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) fact11: {A}{aa} -> ¬{AA}{aa} fact12: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x fact13: ¬({AB}{aa} & ¬{C}{aa}) fact14: ¬{AA}{aa} -> ¬({C}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact15: ¬{B}{fq} fact16: ¬{AB}{aa} -> ¬({B}{a} & {A}{a}) fact17: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{C}{aa}) fact18: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{A}{aa} & {B}{aa}) fact19: ¬(¬{H}{c} & {F}{c}) -> ¬{F}{c} fact20: ¬{C}{a} -> ¬(¬{C}{aa} & {B}{aa}) fact21: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬({A}{aa} & {C}{aa}) fact22: (x): ¬{F}x -> ({D}x v {E}x) fact23: ¬({B}{b} & ¬{A}{b})

This lomustine is not a kind of a cgs and that one does not crossbreed.

(¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that this wintergreen is a pair but the thing does not sum boogie does not hold if Brian is not a kind of a Andricus. fact2: The fact that Brian does not crossbreed and is not axonal is wrong. fact3: The fact that this lomustine is not a cgs and it does not crossbreed does not hold if this wintergreen is not a cgs. fact4: If Brian is a Andricus then this lomustine is a Andricus. fact5: Someone is not a Andricus if it is a pair. fact6: If some man is a Andricus the one is not a cgs and does not crossbreed. fact7: The fact that Brian is not a kind of a Andricus hold. fact8: The fact that the fact that this lomustine is a cgs but the thing does not sum boogie is true is wrong. fact9: The fact that this lomustine is both not a cgs and a pair does not hold. fact10: If Brian is not a Andricus then that this wintergreen is a kind of a Andricus and does not sum boogie does not hold. fact11: If this wintergreen is a Andricus this wintergreen is not a pair. fact12: If the fact that something is a pair but it does not sum boogie is wrong the fact that it is not a cgs is correct. fact13: That this wintergreen sums boogie and does not crossbreed is false. fact14: If this wintergreen is not a pair that this lomustine crossbreeds and does sum boogie is not correct. fact15: This nag is not a cgs. fact16: If this wintergreen does not sum boogie then the fact that this lomustine is both a cgs and a Andricus is not true. fact17: The fact that this wintergreen is not a pair and it does not crossbreed does not hold. fact18: The fact that this wintergreen is not a Andricus but that person is a kind of a cgs is false if this lomustine is not a kind of a Andricus. fact19: If the fact that that this troll is both not a Strelitzia and isomorphic is incorrect is right the thing is not isomorphic. fact20: If this lomustine does not crossbreed then the fact that this wintergreen does not crossbreed but it is a kind of a cgs does not hold. fact21: If Brian is not a cgs then the fact that this wintergreen is a Andricus and it crossbreeds is incorrect. fact22: Something Downs glomerulonephritis or that thing is a hepatomegaly or both if the fact that that thing is not isomorphic is true. fact23: That Brian is a cgs but this thing is not a Andricus is not correct. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that this lomustine is not a cgs and it does not crossbreed does not hold. ; $proof$ =

fact12 -> int1: If the fact that this wintergreen is a pair but that person does not sum boogie is false this wintergreen is not a cgs.; fact7 & fact1 -> int2: The fact that this wintergreen is a pair and does not sum boogie does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This wintergreen is not a cgs.; int3 & fact3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That either this fractionation occurs or that belonging paleoanthropology does not happens or both hold.

({AA} v ¬{AB})

fact1: If the fact that this bellowing but notthis tormenting happens is incorrect then this bellowing does not happens. fact2: If that haemodialysis does not happens then that this bellowing happens and this tormenting does not occurs does not hold. fact3: That that nilpotentness occurs and this chipping happens prevents that haemodialysis. fact4: That this fractionation occurs or that belonging paleoanthropology does not happens or both does not hold. fact5: The fact that if this bellowing does not occurs that the ambuscading Glaucium happens or the overboiling 12 does not occurs or both is false is right. fact6: That this fractionation occurs and/or that belonging paleoanthropology does not happens is brought about by that this bellowing does not happens.

fact1: ¬({A} & ¬{C}) -> ¬{A} fact2: ¬{B} -> ¬({A} & ¬{C}) fact3: ({E} & {D}) -> ¬{B} fact4: ¬({AA} v ¬{AB}) fact5: ¬{A} -> ¬({DP} v ¬{M}) fact6: ¬{A} -> ({AA} v ¬{AB})

That either this fractionation occurs or that belonging paleoanthropology does not happens or both hold.

({AA} v ¬{AB})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If the fact that this bellowing but notthis tormenting happens is incorrect then this bellowing does not happens. fact2: If that haemodialysis does not happens then that this bellowing happens and this tormenting does not occurs does not hold. fact3: That that nilpotentness occurs and this chipping happens prevents that haemodialysis. fact4: That this fractionation occurs or that belonging paleoanthropology does not happens or both does not hold. fact5: The fact that if this bellowing does not occurs that the ambuscading Glaucium happens or the overboiling 12 does not occurs or both is false is right. fact6: That this fractionation occurs and/or that belonging paleoanthropology does not happens is brought about by that this bellowing does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That either this fractionation occurs or that belonging paleoanthropology does not happens or both hold. ; $proof$ =

fact4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This aquiculturalness happens.

{C}

fact1: The grading Phrygia occurs and that ranting occurs.

fact1: ({A} & {B})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The grading Phrygia occurs and that ranting occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = This aquiculturalness happens. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This whack does not occurs.

¬{D}

fact1: The implacableness happens. fact2: The fact that this anthropogenicness occurs is right. fact3: Both that oppositeness and that waiting occurs. fact4: The undoing stretched does not occurs. fact5: That that employableness does not occurs is prevented by that this hirsuteness occurs. fact6: If that this coolerness does not occurs and this bethinking spiked does not happens does not hold then this palaeontologicalness does not occurs. fact7: That ferricness happens. fact8: That that deceleration does not happens yields that this whack and this benignness happens. fact9: If the pollution and the land happens then that the socage does not happens hold. fact10: If this palaeontologicalness does not occurs then the fact that either this hirsuteness or that employableness or both occurs is incorrect. fact11: This hirsuteness occurs. fact12: This pushing occurs and the interment happens. fact13: This benignness occurs and that deceleration happens. fact14: The ambushing occurs. fact15: If that deceleration does not occurs this annoying occurs and this benignness happens. fact16: The twisted does not occurs. fact17: That if this patronizing featheriness does not happens the fact that this coolerness does not happens and this bethinking spiked does not occurs does not hold is correct. fact18: The greens happens. fact19: This benignness happens. fact20: If the clausalness occurs the falling occurs. fact21: The weeding occurs if the quickie happens. fact22: That slacking circumflex occurs and that free occurs.

fact1: {IO} fact2: {CO} fact3: ({R} & {EK}) fact4: ¬{BC} fact5: {E} -> {C} fact6: ¬(¬{H} & ¬{G}) -> ¬{F} fact7: {AP} fact8: ¬{B} -> ({D} & {A}) fact9: ({FB} & {AC}) -> ¬{O} fact10: ¬{F} -> ¬({E} v {C}) fact11: {E} fact12: ({IC} & {IG}) fact13: ({A} & {B}) fact14: {HE} fact15: ¬{B} -> ({EA} & {A}) fact16: ¬{GJ} fact17: ¬{I} -> ¬(¬{H} & ¬{G}) fact18: {BP} fact19: {A} fact20: {CK} -> {BT} fact21: {HJ} -> {FC} fact22: ({ID} & {Q})

This whack occurs.

{D}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The implacableness happens. fact2: The fact that this anthropogenicness occurs is right. fact3: Both that oppositeness and that waiting occurs. fact4: The undoing stretched does not occurs. fact5: That that employableness does not occurs is prevented by that this hirsuteness occurs. fact6: If that this coolerness does not occurs and this bethinking spiked does not happens does not hold then this palaeontologicalness does not occurs. fact7: That ferricness happens. fact8: That that deceleration does not happens yields that this whack and this benignness happens. fact9: If the pollution and the land happens then that the socage does not happens hold. fact10: If this palaeontologicalness does not occurs then the fact that either this hirsuteness or that employableness or both occurs is incorrect. fact11: This hirsuteness occurs. fact12: This pushing occurs and the interment happens. fact13: This benignness occurs and that deceleration happens. fact14: The ambushing occurs. fact15: If that deceleration does not occurs this annoying occurs and this benignness happens. fact16: The twisted does not occurs. fact17: That if this patronizing featheriness does not happens the fact that this coolerness does not happens and this bethinking spiked does not occurs does not hold is correct. fact18: The greens happens. fact19: This benignness happens. fact20: If the clausalness occurs the falling occurs. fact21: The weeding occurs if the quickie happens. fact22: That slacking circumflex occurs and that free occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = This whack does not occurs. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This calamus does not audition turgidity but it is nonjudgmental.

(¬{A}{aa} & {C}{aa})

fact1: If that caranda is not interspecific then that this calamus is a kind of non-anabiotic one that is not non-myelic is not correct. fact2: That some person does not audition turgidity but it is nonjudgmental does not hold if it is not haploidic. fact3: Something is non-haploidic if the fact that that is not anabiotic and is myelic does not hold. fact4: That if that someone is not a obstinance and is a Trevino is wrong then it is not interspecific hold. fact5: That caranda is not interspecific.

fact1: ¬{D}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) fact2: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & {C}x) fact3: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x fact4: (x): ¬(¬{GQ}x & {IE}x) -> ¬{D}x fact5: ¬{D}{a}

The fact that the period is not interspecific is not incorrect if the fact that the period is not a kind of a obstinance and is a Trevino is wrong.

¬(¬{GQ}{gu} & {IE}{gu}) -> ¬{D}{gu}

DISPROVED

PROVED

DISPROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: If that caranda is not interspecific then that this calamus is a kind of non-anabiotic one that is not non-myelic is not correct. fact2: That some person does not audition turgidity but it is nonjudgmental does not hold if it is not haploidic. fact3: Something is non-haploidic if the fact that that is not anabiotic and is myelic does not hold. fact4: That if that someone is not a obstinance and is a Trevino is wrong then it is not interspecific hold. fact5: That caranda is not interspecific. ; $hypothesis$ = This calamus does not audition turgidity but it is nonjudgmental. ; $proof$ =

fact3 -> int1: If the fact that this calamus is not anabiotic and is not non-myelic does not hold it is non-haploidic.; fact5 & fact1 -> int2: The fact that this calamus is non-anabiotic but this one is myelic does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This calamus is not haploidic.; fact2 -> int4: If this calamus is not haploidic then the fact that this calamus does not audition turgidity and is not judgmental does not hold.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This paranoiac is a kind of a Caryophyllales or it tuskeds agnomen or both.

({C}{b} v {B}{b})

fact1: Something does not tusked agnomen if the fact that it is not kafkaesque and/or it does not tusked agnomen hold. fact2: That curative is not a Caryophyllales if that scilla is a Caryophyllales and it is a kind of a hidden. fact3: If Lin yens then this paranoiac is a kind of a hidden. fact4: Someone that is not a Caryophyllales is non-kafkaesque and/or does not tusked agnomen. fact5: That scilla is a Caryophyllales. fact6: That scilla tuskeds agnomen. fact7: If this paranoiac is a hidden that scilla is a hidden. fact8: This paranoiac is a kind of a hidden if Lin is a kind of a scrip. fact9: Somebody is a Caryophyllales if that this one is not a Cyrus and this one is not a kind of an overabundance is incorrect. fact10: If that scilla is a Caryophyllales then the fact that this paranoiac is unanimated hold. fact11: If the fact that that scilla is unanimated is true then this paranoiac tuskeds agnomen. fact12: Someone is capitular and it is unanimated if it does not tusked agnomen. fact13: If somebody is not a Platylobium the fact that it is not a Cyrus and is not an overabundance does not hold. fact14: If Anibal is not a wholeheartedness Lin is a scrip and/or this person does yen. fact15: That scilla bones twinned. fact16: The tunaburger tuskeds agnomen. fact17: Anibal is not a wholeheartedness. fact18: That scilla is not animated. fact19: If somebody bones twinned the person is not a Platylobium. fact20: That scilla is a west.

fact1: (x): (¬{D}x v ¬{B}x) -> ¬{B}x fact2: ({C}{a} & {F}{a}) -> ¬{C}{hd} fact3: {J}{c} -> {F}{b} fact4: (x): ¬{C}x -> (¬{D}x v ¬{B}x) fact5: {C}{a} fact6: {B}{a} fact7: {F}{b} -> {F}{a} fact8: {K}{c} -> {F}{b} fact9: (x): ¬(¬{E}x & ¬{G}x) -> {C}x fact10: {C}{a} -> {A}{b} fact11: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} fact12: (x): ¬{B}x -> ({AT}x & {A}x) fact13: (x): ¬{H}x -> ¬(¬{E}x & ¬{G}x) fact14: ¬{L}{d} -> ({K}{c} v {J}{c}) fact15: {I}{a} fact16: {B}{bg} fact17: ¬{L}{d} fact18: {A}{a} fact19: (x): {I}x -> ¬{H}x fact20: {CG}{a}

That curative is juiceless and/or this thing is capitular.

({HG}{hd} v {AT}{hd})

PROVED

PROVED

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: Something does not tusked agnomen if the fact that it is not kafkaesque and/or it does not tusked agnomen hold. fact2: That curative is not a Caryophyllales if that scilla is a Caryophyllales and it is a kind of a hidden. fact3: If Lin yens then this paranoiac is a kind of a hidden. fact4: Someone that is not a Caryophyllales is non-kafkaesque and/or does not tusked agnomen. fact5: That scilla is a Caryophyllales. fact6: That scilla tuskeds agnomen. fact7: If this paranoiac is a hidden that scilla is a hidden. fact8: This paranoiac is a kind of a hidden if Lin is a kind of a scrip. fact9: Somebody is a Caryophyllales if that this one is not a Cyrus and this one is not a kind of an overabundance is incorrect. fact10: If that scilla is a Caryophyllales then the fact that this paranoiac is unanimated hold. fact11: If the fact that that scilla is unanimated is true then this paranoiac tuskeds agnomen. fact12: Someone is capitular and it is unanimated if it does not tusked agnomen. fact13: If somebody is not a Platylobium the fact that it is not a Cyrus and is not an overabundance does not hold. fact14: If Anibal is not a wholeheartedness Lin is a scrip and/or this person does yen. fact15: That scilla bones twinned. fact16: The tunaburger tuskeds agnomen. fact17: Anibal is not a wholeheartedness. fact18: That scilla is not animated. fact19: If somebody bones twinned the person is not a Platylobium. fact20: That scilla is a west. ; $hypothesis$ = This paranoiac is a kind of a Caryophyllales or it tuskeds agnomen or both. ; $proof$ =

fact11 & fact18 -> int1: That this paranoiac tuskeds agnomen hold.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That narwhale does not swob vertu.

¬{C}{c}

fact1: Someone does not swob vertu if it fingers uxoriousness. fact2: That narwhale swobs vertu if that bodice ensues. fact3: That bodice is a vitiligo. fact4: Somebody that is not a Fungia does not ensue and does finger uxoriousness. fact5: Priya fingers uxoriousness. fact6: That bodice ensues if Priya fingers uxoriousness. fact7: this uxoriousness fingers Priya. fact8: That bodice fingers uxoriousness.

fact1: (x): {A}x -> ¬{C}x fact2: {B}{b} -> {C}{c} fact3: {HS}{b} fact4: (x): ¬{D}x -> (¬{B}x & {A}x) fact5: {A}{a} fact6: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} fact7: {AA}{aa} fact8: {A}{b}

That narwhale does not swob vertu.

¬{C}{c}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Someone does not swob vertu if it fingers uxoriousness. fact2: That narwhale swobs vertu if that bodice ensues. fact3: That bodice is a vitiligo. fact4: Somebody that is not a Fungia does not ensue and does finger uxoriousness. fact5: Priya fingers uxoriousness. fact6: That bodice ensues if Priya fingers uxoriousness. fact7: this uxoriousness fingers Priya. fact8: That bodice fingers uxoriousness. ; $hypothesis$ = That narwhale does not swob vertu. ; $proof$ =

fact6 & fact5 -> int1: That bodice ensues.; int1 & fact2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That autolysis is not a galactocele.

¬{C}{c}

fact1: If that autolysis does not displease Malta the fact that this wake propels anesthesia and/or it is a galactocele does not hold. fact2: This render does not scrub cropped if this wake does not displease Malta. fact3: Something does not displease Malta if that is not a kind of a galactocele. fact4: That something does not displease Malta but that thing propels anesthesia is wrong if that thing is an advisability. fact5: If someone does not propel anesthesia then the one is not a galactocele. fact6: This wake is an advisability if this render is clayey. fact7: If the fact that somebody is a kind of distributional one that does not lease Hoffmann hold then the person is not obligate. fact8: This render is Proustian and is clayey if that gametogenesis does not wrap shamefulness. fact9: That autolysis does not propel anesthesia if that either this render is a Offenbach or it scrubs cropped or both is false. fact10: If this wake displeases Malta that sawdust is not a kind of a Offenbach. fact11: this Malta does not displease wake. fact12: If that autolysis is not a Offenbach then that autolysis does not propel anesthesia. fact13: This render is not a Melospiza. fact14: The Cardura does not colour Ailey and does not disperse Chalcididae. fact15: Something does not wrap shamefulness if the fact that it does not remit and it is not ovular is wrong. fact16: This wake does not displease Malta. fact17: This wake is not a Offenbach. fact18: Some man does not displease Malta if this person does not propel anesthesia. fact19: If something is not obligate then that that does not remit and that is not ovular is incorrect. fact20: This Nut does not colour Ailey if the Cardura does not colour Ailey and it does not disperse Chalcididae. fact21: This render does not scrub cropped. fact22: That that gametogenesis is distributional but it does not lease Hoffmann if this Nut does not colour Ailey hold. fact23: If some person does not detail Uruguay this one is not obligate.

fact1: ¬{A}{c} -> ¬({B}{a} v {C}{a}) fact2: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{AB}{b} fact3: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬{A}x fact4: (x): {D}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & {B}x) fact5: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬{C}x fact6: {E}{b} -> {D}{a} fact7: (x): ({L}x & ¬{K}x) -> ¬{J}x fact8: ¬{G}{d} -> ({F}{b} & {E}{b}) fact9: ¬({AA}{b} v {AB}{b}) -> ¬{B}{c} fact10: {A}{a} -> ¬{AA}{gl} fact11: ¬{AC}{aa} fact12: ¬{AA}{c} -> ¬{B}{c} fact13: ¬{JF}{b} fact14: (¬{M}{f} & ¬{N}{f}) fact15: (x): ¬(¬{I}x & ¬{H}x) -> ¬{G}x fact16: ¬{A}{a} fact17: ¬{AA}{a} fact18: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬{A}x fact19: (x): ¬{J}x -> ¬(¬{I}x & ¬{H}x) fact20: (¬{M}{f} & ¬{N}{f}) -> ¬{M}{e} fact21: ¬{AB}{b} fact22: ¬{M}{e} -> ({L}{d} & ¬{K}{d}) fact23: (x): ¬{FI}x -> ¬{J}x

That sawdust is not a Offenbach.

¬{AA}{gl}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that autolysis does not displease Malta the fact that this wake propels anesthesia and/or it is a galactocele does not hold. fact2: This render does not scrub cropped if this wake does not displease Malta. fact3: Something does not displease Malta if that is not a kind of a galactocele. fact4: That something does not displease Malta but that thing propels anesthesia is wrong if that thing is an advisability. fact5: If someone does not propel anesthesia then the one is not a galactocele. fact6: This wake is an advisability if this render is clayey. fact7: If the fact that somebody is a kind of distributional one that does not lease Hoffmann hold then the person is not obligate. fact8: This render is Proustian and is clayey if that gametogenesis does not wrap shamefulness. fact9: That autolysis does not propel anesthesia if that either this render is a Offenbach or it scrubs cropped or both is false. fact10: If this wake displeases Malta that sawdust is not a kind of a Offenbach. fact11: this Malta does not displease wake. fact12: If that autolysis is not a Offenbach then that autolysis does not propel anesthesia. fact13: This render is not a Melospiza. fact14: The Cardura does not colour Ailey and does not disperse Chalcididae. fact15: Something does not wrap shamefulness if the fact that it does not remit and it is not ovular is wrong. fact16: This wake does not displease Malta. fact17: This wake is not a Offenbach. fact18: Some man does not displease Malta if this person does not propel anesthesia. fact19: If something is not obligate then that that does not remit and that is not ovular is incorrect. fact20: This Nut does not colour Ailey if the Cardura does not colour Ailey and it does not disperse Chalcididae. fact21: This render does not scrub cropped. fact22: That that gametogenesis is distributional but it does not lease Hoffmann if this Nut does not colour Ailey hold. fact23: If some person does not detail Uruguay this one is not obligate. ; $hypothesis$ = That autolysis is not a galactocele. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This nightcap does not merchandise quadrilateral.

¬{A}{a}

fact1: Everything is not a polarity. fact2: If that that etamin is not thematic is not false then that etamin is umbelliform. fact3: This nightcap is a Dalian. fact4: This nightcap drizzles Lydian. fact5: This composer drizzles Lydian. fact6: Someone drizzles Lydian if that it merchandises quadrilateral hold. fact7: This nightcap drizzles Lydian and blackguards Aiken. fact8: This stutterer does merchandise quadrilateral and is subsonic if there is someone such that it is umbelliform. fact9: The fact that if somebody is not a polarity it is umbelliform and it is subsonic hold. fact10: This baulk is a kind of Galwegian one that does drizzle Lydian. fact11: Some person does not merchandise quadrilateral if the person does not drizzle Lydian and is not alkylic. fact12: The fact that this nightcap is transoceanic and it is a kind of a Chamaea is right. fact13: If this nightcap is an interest this stutterer is a kind of an interest. fact14: That lotus is not a polarity. fact15: That etamin is unthematic. fact16: This nightcap is both not non-center and a Colutea.

fact1: (x): ¬{F}x fact2: {G}{b} -> {E}{b} fact3: {GB}{a} fact4: {B}{a} fact5: {B}{gh} fact6: (x): {A}x -> {B}x fact7: ({B}{a} & {EB}{a}) fact8: (x): {E}x -> ({A}{bq} & {D}{bq}) fact9: (x): ¬{F}x -> ({E}x & {D}x) fact10: ({BH}{cs} & {B}{cs}) fact11: (x): (¬{B}x & ¬{C}x) -> ¬{A}x fact12: ({DK}{a} & {IL}{a}) fact13: {AQ}{a} -> {AQ}{bq} fact14: ¬{F}{c} fact15: {G}{b} fact16: ({DU}{a} & {GD}{a})

This stutterer does drizzle Lydian and this thing is an interest.

({B}{bq} & {AQ}{bq})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Everything is not a polarity. fact2: If that that etamin is not thematic is not false then that etamin is umbelliform. fact3: This nightcap is a Dalian. fact4: This nightcap drizzles Lydian. fact5: This composer drizzles Lydian. fact6: Someone drizzles Lydian if that it merchandises quadrilateral hold. fact7: This nightcap drizzles Lydian and blackguards Aiken. fact8: This stutterer does merchandise quadrilateral and is subsonic if there is someone such that it is umbelliform. fact9: The fact that if somebody is not a polarity it is umbelliform and it is subsonic hold. fact10: This baulk is a kind of Galwegian one that does drizzle Lydian. fact11: Some person does not merchandise quadrilateral if the person does not drizzle Lydian and is not alkylic. fact12: The fact that this nightcap is transoceanic and it is a kind of a Chamaea is right. fact13: If this nightcap is an interest this stutterer is a kind of an interest. fact14: That lotus is not a polarity. fact15: That etamin is unthematic. fact16: This nightcap is both not non-center and a Colutea. ; $hypothesis$ = This nightcap does not merchandise quadrilateral. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That this paraquet is not a fracture and/or does not endorse does not hold.

¬(¬{A}{a} v ¬{B}{a})

fact1: If the fact that this actomyosin is not a Devil but he accents fruiting is wrong the fact that this bacca is not a kind of a Devil is right. fact2: This actomyosin is reptilian if that indene is apomictic. fact3: This marcel does not hydrate Zinnemann if Morris does not awake. fact4: That this marcel does not hydrate Zinnemann is true if Morris does not circumambulate metalepsis. fact5: If something is reptilian then it is unselfish thing that does not State yodel. fact6: If this bacca does not accent fruiting she endorses and is not a Devil. fact7: This paraquet is a fracture or this does not endorse or both. fact8: The pettifogger does not endorse. fact9: The better is not a fracture. fact10: This paraquet is not a kind of a fracture and/or it does endorse. fact11: Morris does not circumambulate metalepsis and/or does not awake. fact12: If the fact that something is inductive and is a Carangidae is incorrect then that thing is not a Carangidae. fact13: This paraquet is not reptilian. fact14: If the fact that this marcel does not hydrate Zinnemann is true then the fact that that that God is inductive and it is a Carangidae is right is wrong. fact15: That the fact that this paraquet is not a kind of a fracture and/or it does not endorse hold is incorrect if this bacca is not a kind of a Devil. fact16: The fact that something is not a Devil and accents fruiting does not hold if this is unselfish. fact17: If this bacca endorses either this paraquet does not circumambulate metalepsis or she/he is not a fracture or both.

fact1: ¬(¬{C}{c} & {D}{c}) -> ¬{C}{b} fact2: {H}{d} -> {G}{c} fact3: ¬{M}{g} -> ¬{J}{f} fact4: ¬{L}{g} -> ¬{J}{f} fact5: (x): {G}x -> ({E}x & ¬{F}x) fact6: ¬{D}{b} -> ({B}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) fact7: ({A}{a} v ¬{B}{a}) fact8: ¬{B}{r} fact9: ¬{A}{dp} fact10: (¬{A}{a} v {B}{a}) fact11: (¬{L}{g} v ¬{M}{g}) fact12: (x): ¬({K}x & {I}x) -> ¬{I}x fact13: ¬{G}{a} fact14: ¬{J}{f} -> ¬({K}{e} & {I}{e}) fact15: ¬{C}{b} -> ¬(¬{A}{a} v ¬{B}{a}) fact16: (x): {E}x -> ¬(¬{C}x & {D}x) fact17: {B}{b} -> (¬{L}{a} v ¬{A}{a})

This paraquet does not circumambulate metalepsis and/or is not a fracture.

(¬{L}{a} v ¬{A}{a})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If the fact that this actomyosin is not a Devil but he accents fruiting is wrong the fact that this bacca is not a kind of a Devil is right. fact2: This actomyosin is reptilian if that indene is apomictic. fact3: This marcel does not hydrate Zinnemann if Morris does not awake. fact4: That this marcel does not hydrate Zinnemann is true if Morris does not circumambulate metalepsis. fact5: If something is reptilian then it is unselfish thing that does not State yodel. fact6: If this bacca does not accent fruiting she endorses and is not a Devil. fact7: This paraquet is a fracture or this does not endorse or both. fact8: The pettifogger does not endorse. fact9: The better is not a fracture. fact10: This paraquet is not a kind of a fracture and/or it does endorse. fact11: Morris does not circumambulate metalepsis and/or does not awake. fact12: If the fact that something is inductive and is a Carangidae is incorrect then that thing is not a Carangidae. fact13: This paraquet is not reptilian. fact14: If the fact that this marcel does not hydrate Zinnemann is true then the fact that that that God is inductive and it is a Carangidae is right is wrong. fact15: That the fact that this paraquet is not a kind of a fracture and/or it does not endorse hold is incorrect if this bacca is not a kind of a Devil. fact16: The fact that something is not a Devil and accents fruiting does not hold if this is unselfish. fact17: If this bacca endorses either this paraquet does not circumambulate metalepsis or she/he is not a fracture or both. ; $hypothesis$ = That this paraquet is not a fracture and/or does not endorse does not hold. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This dozer is a Hemigalus.

{E}{b}

fact1: This sandpile is granulomatous and is unconstricted. fact2: There is something such that that is not granulomatous. fact3: This sandpile is a stringency and it is unconstricted. fact4: Someone is high if that it is a kind of non-granulomatous one that does not hiss creepiness does not hold. fact5: This dozer is unconstricted. fact6: This sandpile is a kind of a stringency if that honeybells hisses creepiness. fact7: This sandpile is a Hemigalus. fact8: Something is a Hemigalus if the fact that it is not energetic and is not a Hemigalus does not hold. fact9: If that honeybells is energetic then that gargoyle oppresses lyricality. fact10: This dozer is not a kind of a Hemigalus if this sandpile hisses creepiness and is granulomatous. fact11: This dozer is granulomatous. fact12: That panicle is a invalidity and unconstricted. fact13: This sandpile does hiss creepiness if that honeybells is a stringency. fact14: The fact that this dozer is non-energetic thing that is not a kind of a Hemigalus does not hold if this dozer is not a stringency. fact15: This dozer corners Canada or darkens fund or both. fact16: That honeybells hisses creepiness and/or is a stringency. fact17: If this dozer is not unconstricted then that honeybells is a stringency but not non-energetic. fact18: That honeybells is energetic and/or it is a stringency. fact19: If that honeybells is energetic then this sandpile does hiss creepiness. fact20: This dozer is not non-granulomatous if this sandpile is a Hemigalus. fact21: This sandpile is unconstricted. fact22: This dozer is a stringency if that honeybells is a Hemigalus.

fact1: ({D}{c} & {F}{c}) fact2: (Ex): ¬{D}x fact3: ({B}{c} & {F}{c}) fact4: (x): ¬(¬{D}x & ¬{C}x) -> {DH}x fact5: {F}{b} fact6: {C}{a} -> {B}{c} fact7: {E}{c} fact8: (x): ¬(¬{A}x & ¬{E}x) -> {E}x fact9: {A}{a} -> {IG}{aj} fact10: ({C}{c} & {D}{c}) -> ¬{E}{b} fact11: {D}{b} fact12: ({FL}{ac} & {F}{ac}) fact13: {B}{a} -> {C}{c} fact14: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬(¬{A}{b} & ¬{E}{b}) fact15: ({AT}{b} v {DE}{b}) fact16: ({C}{a} v {B}{a}) fact17: ¬{F}{b} -> ({B}{a} & {A}{a}) fact18: ({A}{a} v {B}{a}) fact19: {A}{a} -> {C}{c} fact20: {E}{c} -> {D}{b} fact21: {F}{c} fact22: {E}{a} -> {B}{b}

This dozer is a Hemigalus.

{E}{b}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This sandpile is granulomatous and is unconstricted. fact2: There is something such that that is not granulomatous. fact3: This sandpile is a stringency and it is unconstricted. fact4: Someone is high if that it is a kind of non-granulomatous one that does not hiss creepiness does not hold. fact5: This dozer is unconstricted. fact6: This sandpile is a kind of a stringency if that honeybells hisses creepiness. fact7: This sandpile is a Hemigalus. fact8: Something is a Hemigalus if the fact that it is not energetic and is not a Hemigalus does not hold. fact9: If that honeybells is energetic then that gargoyle oppresses lyricality. fact10: This dozer is not a kind of a Hemigalus if this sandpile hisses creepiness and is granulomatous. fact11: This dozer is granulomatous. fact12: That panicle is a invalidity and unconstricted. fact13: This sandpile does hiss creepiness if that honeybells is a stringency. fact14: The fact that this dozer is non-energetic thing that is not a kind of a Hemigalus does not hold if this dozer is not a stringency. fact15: This dozer corners Canada or darkens fund or both. fact16: That honeybells hisses creepiness and/or is a stringency. fact17: If this dozer is not unconstricted then that honeybells is a stringency but not non-energetic. fact18: That honeybells is energetic and/or it is a stringency. fact19: If that honeybells is energetic then this sandpile does hiss creepiness. fact20: This dozer is not non-granulomatous if this sandpile is a Hemigalus. fact21: This sandpile is unconstricted. fact22: This dozer is a stringency if that honeybells is a Hemigalus. ; $hypothesis$ = This dozer is a Hemigalus. ; $proof$ =

fact18 & fact19 & fact13 -> int1: This sandpile hisses creepiness.; fact1 -> int2: This sandpile is granulomatous.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This sandpile hisses creepiness and is granulomatous.; int3 & fact10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

Garrett does not fleet coin.

¬{D}{c}

fact1: The fact that the fantast is an ergotism is correct. fact2: If the fact that some person is not fetal and that one does not fleet coin is false then that one fleet coin. fact3: That analyser is an ergotism if that that schoolroom is not fetal hold. fact4: That that schoolroom is not fetal and does not fleet coin does not hold if that analyser does not forge insensitiveness. fact5: The fact that Garrett fleets coin is right if that analyser is an ergotism. fact6: That schoolroom does not forge insensitiveness. fact7: That schoolroom does not forge insensitiveness and this thing is not fetal.

fact1: {C}{ai} fact2: (x): ¬(¬{B}x & ¬{D}x) -> {D}x fact3: ¬{B}{a} -> {C}{b} fact4: ¬{A}{b} -> ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{D}{a}) fact5: {C}{b} -> {D}{c} fact6: ¬{A}{a} fact7: (¬{A}{a} & ¬{B}{a})

The soak fleets coin.

{D}{ho}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that the fantast is an ergotism is correct. fact2: If the fact that some person is not fetal and that one does not fleet coin is false then that one fleet coin. fact3: That analyser is an ergotism if that that schoolroom is not fetal hold. fact4: That that schoolroom is not fetal and does not fleet coin does not hold if that analyser does not forge insensitiveness. fact5: The fact that Garrett fleets coin is right if that analyser is an ergotism. fact6: That schoolroom does not forge insensitiveness. fact7: That schoolroom does not forge insensitiveness and this thing is not fetal. ; $hypothesis$ = Garrett does not fleet coin. ; $proof$ =

fact7 -> int1: That schoolroom is not fetal.; int1 & fact3 -> int2: That analyser is a kind of an ergotism.; int2 & fact5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

Let's assume that that this Cecropia stores decadence and is not tractive is false.

¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a})

fact1: This transferee is Masonic but that thing is not tractive. fact2: This Cecropia is a Cypraea. fact3: If the fact that this transferee stores decadence but it is not tractive does not hold then this Cecropia is not uneducated. fact4: This transferee does not store decadence if that this Cecropia is tractive thing that is not uneducated is wrong. fact5: Deb stores decadence. fact6: If the fact that this Cecropia stores decadence and is not tractive does not hold this transferee is educated. fact7: This Cecropia is not uneducated if the fact that this transferee is tractive but the person does not store decadence is not correct. fact8: The fact that this transferee is tractive but it does not stroke does not hold. fact9: This bivouac is not tractive. fact10: This Cecropia stores decadence and is not uneducated. fact11: This transferee is uneducated.

fact1: ({L}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact2: {ED}{a} fact3: ¬({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact4: ¬({AB}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> ¬{AA}{b} fact5: {AA}{gf} fact6: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact7: ¬({AB}{b} & ¬{AA}{b}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact8: ¬({AB}{b} & ¬{EN}{b}) fact9: ¬{AB}{ec} fact10: ({AA}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) fact11: {B}{b}

DISPROVED

DISPROVED

$facts$ = fact1: This transferee is Masonic but that thing is not tractive. fact2: This Cecropia is a Cypraea. fact3: If the fact that this transferee stores decadence but it is not tractive does not hold then this Cecropia is not uneducated. fact4: This transferee does not store decadence if that this Cecropia is tractive thing that is not uneducated is wrong. fact5: Deb stores decadence. fact6: If the fact that this Cecropia stores decadence and is not tractive does not hold this transferee is educated. fact7: This Cecropia is not uneducated if the fact that this transferee is tractive but the person does not store decadence is not correct. fact8: The fact that this transferee is tractive but it does not stroke does not hold. fact9: This bivouac is not tractive. fact10: This Cecropia stores decadence and is not uneducated. fact11: This transferee is uneducated. ; $hypothesis$ = Let's assume that that this Cecropia stores decadence and is not tractive is false. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that that this Cecropia stores decadence and is not tractive is false.; fact6 & assump1 -> int1: This transferee is not uneducated.; int1 & fact11 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This nonmagneticness happens.

{D}

fact1: If the fact that the angiocarpicness does not occurs and the unbornness does not happens does not hold the unshrinkableness does not happens. fact2: If this lunching Gibran occurs then this nonmagneticness does not happens. fact3: That that overbearing kinaesthesis does not occurs is prevented by that that animisticness happens. fact4: That the anticlockwiseness does not happens prevents that that endozoanness happens. fact5: If that the rededicating plowed does not happens and that futuristness occurs is wrong that this processionalness does not happens is not false. fact6: That improvidentness occurs. fact7: That bedewing Lennoaceae occurs if that that hoping physicalness does not occurs and that bedewing Lennoaceae does not occurs is false. fact8: If this aversion occurs then that improvidentness does not happens and this lunching Gibran does not happens. fact9: If that overbearing kinaesthesis occurs then the fact that this aversion occurs is not incorrect. fact10: That this non-angiocarpicness and this non-unbornness occurs does not hold if that endozoanness does not occurs. fact11: That animisticness occurs if the fact that this refreshing and this non-cadavericness occurs does not hold. fact12: If the unshrinkableness does not occurs then the fact that this refreshing occurs but the cadavericness does not occurs is wrong. fact13: Both this licking and that improvidentness happens. fact14: This winking rowdyism happens and the withering Citlaltepetl happens. fact15: The anticlockwiseness does not happens if the fact that this unmutilatedness occurs and the mythicizing Helwingia occurs does not hold. fact16: If the fact that this processionalness does not happens is not wrong then the fact that this unmutilatedness and the mythicizing Helwingia occurs is false. fact17: That that improvidentness does not happens causes that this nonmagneticness and this licking occurs. fact18: That this nonmagneticness does not happens is triggered by that this lunching Gibran occurs and/or this licking. fact19: If that bedewing Lennoaceae occurs that the rededicating plowed does not occurs but that futuristness occurs is false.

fact1: ¬(¬{L} & ¬{K}) -> ¬{J} fact2: {C} -> ¬{D} fact3: {G} -> {F} fact4: ¬{N} -> ¬{M} fact5: ¬(¬{S} & {R}) -> ¬{Q} fact6: {B} fact7: ¬(¬{U} & ¬{T}) -> {T} fact8: {E} -> (¬{B} & ¬{C}) fact9: {F} -> {E} fact10: ¬{M} -> ¬(¬{L} & ¬{K}) fact11: ¬({I} & ¬{H}) -> {G} fact12: ¬{J} -> ¬({I} & ¬{H}) fact13: ({A} & {B}) fact14: ({HL} & {EI}) fact15: ¬({P} & {O}) -> ¬{N} fact16: ¬{Q} -> ¬({P} & {O}) fact17: ¬{B} -> ({D} & {A}) fact18: ({C} v {A}) -> ¬{D} fact19: {T} -> ¬(¬{S} & {R})

This nonmagneticness happens.

{D}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If the fact that the angiocarpicness does not occurs and the unbornness does not happens does not hold the unshrinkableness does not happens. fact2: If this lunching Gibran occurs then this nonmagneticness does not happens. fact3: That that overbearing kinaesthesis does not occurs is prevented by that that animisticness happens. fact4: That the anticlockwiseness does not happens prevents that that endozoanness happens. fact5: If that the rededicating plowed does not happens and that futuristness occurs is wrong that this processionalness does not happens is not false. fact6: That improvidentness occurs. fact7: That bedewing Lennoaceae occurs if that that hoping physicalness does not occurs and that bedewing Lennoaceae does not occurs is false. fact8: If this aversion occurs then that improvidentness does not happens and this lunching Gibran does not happens. fact9: If that overbearing kinaesthesis occurs then the fact that this aversion occurs is not incorrect. fact10: That this non-angiocarpicness and this non-unbornness occurs does not hold if that endozoanness does not occurs. fact11: That animisticness occurs if the fact that this refreshing and this non-cadavericness occurs does not hold. fact12: If the unshrinkableness does not occurs then the fact that this refreshing occurs but the cadavericness does not occurs is wrong. fact13: Both this licking and that improvidentness happens. fact14: This winking rowdyism happens and the withering Citlaltepetl happens. fact15: The anticlockwiseness does not happens if the fact that this unmutilatedness occurs and the mythicizing Helwingia occurs does not hold. fact16: If the fact that this processionalness does not happens is not wrong then the fact that this unmutilatedness and the mythicizing Helwingia occurs is false. fact17: That that improvidentness does not happens causes that this nonmagneticness and this licking occurs. fact18: That this nonmagneticness does not happens is triggered by that this lunching Gibran occurs and/or this licking. fact19: If that bedewing Lennoaceae occurs that the rededicating plowed does not occurs but that futuristness occurs is false. ; $hypothesis$ = This nonmagneticness happens. ; $proof$ =

fact13 -> int1: This licking happens.; int1 -> int2: This lunching Gibran happens and/or this licking occurs.; int2 & fact18 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That widoweding delight does not happens.

¬{A}

fact1: That unhelpfulness does not occurs if the fact that notthat barometricness but that unhelpfulness happens is false. fact2: If the fact that both this contrail and that continentalness happens is false the fact that this contrail does not occurs hold. fact3: If this contrail does not happens that kill does not occurs. fact4: That this contrail does not occurs yields that that kill occurs. fact5: If that either that continentalness does not happens or that occupation does not occurs or both does not hold then this contrail does not occurs. fact6: If this destructiveness does not occurs then that that continentalness does not happens and/or that occupation does not occurs does not hold. fact7: That that widoweding delight happens hold. fact8: That this sanction does not occurs is caused by that this sanction does not happens and/or this non-unhelpfulness. fact9: That smokescreen happens. fact10: That this deviation does not happens and that widoweding delight does not happens is brought about by that this sanction does not occurs. fact11: If that kill occurs that barometricness happens. fact12: That barometricness causes that either this sanction does not occurs or that unhelpfulness does not occurs or both. fact13: If this deviation does not occurs then that unsubstantializing handclap occurs and that widoweding delight happens. fact14: This sanction does not occurs and this deviation does not happens if that unhelpfulness does not occurs.

fact1: ¬(¬{E} & {D}) -> ¬{D} fact2: ¬({G} & {H}) -> ¬{G} fact3: ¬{G} -> ¬{F} fact4: ¬{G} -> {F} fact5: ¬(¬{H} v ¬{I}) -> ¬{G} fact6: ¬{J} -> ¬(¬{H} v ¬{I}) fact7: {A} fact8: (¬{C} v ¬{D}) -> ¬{C} fact9: {IL} fact10: ¬{C} -> (¬{B} & ¬{A}) fact11: {F} -> {E} fact12: {E} -> (¬{C} v ¬{D}) fact13: ¬{B} -> ({S} & {A}) fact14: ¬{D} -> (¬{C} & ¬{B})

That unsubstantializing handclap occurs.

{S}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That unhelpfulness does not occurs if the fact that notthat barometricness but that unhelpfulness happens is false. fact2: If the fact that both this contrail and that continentalness happens is false the fact that this contrail does not occurs hold. fact3: If this contrail does not happens that kill does not occurs. fact4: That this contrail does not occurs yields that that kill occurs. fact5: If that either that continentalness does not happens or that occupation does not occurs or both does not hold then this contrail does not occurs. fact6: If this destructiveness does not occurs then that that continentalness does not happens and/or that occupation does not occurs does not hold. fact7: That that widoweding delight happens hold. fact8: That this sanction does not occurs is caused by that this sanction does not happens and/or this non-unhelpfulness. fact9: That smokescreen happens. fact10: That this deviation does not happens and that widoweding delight does not happens is brought about by that this sanction does not occurs. fact11: If that kill occurs that barometricness happens. fact12: That barometricness causes that either this sanction does not occurs or that unhelpfulness does not occurs or both. fact13: If this deviation does not occurs then that unsubstantializing handclap occurs and that widoweding delight happens. fact14: This sanction does not occurs and this deviation does not happens if that unhelpfulness does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That widoweding delight does not happens. ; $proof$ =

fact7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This convenience does not sink.

¬{B}{aa}

fact1: If this convenience does not greet the fact that this convenience does not sink hold. fact2: If that shedder is not a kind of a Mandaeanism that that shedder is both not a Stanton and noncyclical is false. fact3: If this convenience is a scanning and it dotes coated it is not rotary. fact4: If that pseudomonad dotes coated then this convenience sinks. fact5: The fact that the homoeroticism does fasten dissolve and it is an oodles does not hold. fact6: The lemniscus does not fasten dissolve. fact7: If this convenience is not weighty but it is a Labor it do notte coated. fact8: This convenience is non-weighty. fact9: This convenience is not weighty but she/he is a Labor. fact10: If that pseudomonad do notte coated then that this convenience is a kind of a Labor that snuggles Hargeisa is incorrect. fact11: That something greets and does fasten dissolve is incorrect if that do notte coated. fact12: If something does not sink it is not weighty. fact13: This guanine is not a Sinhala and coordinates Hubble. fact14: Something do notte coated if this thing does not sink. fact15: If that something greets and fastens dissolve is wrong then it does not sink. fact16: That calypter does not cake Hydnum. fact17: That bowsprit is weighty if that that shedder is not a Stanton and is noncyclical is false. fact18: If someone does not greet the fact that this one fastens dissolve and this one is a Labor is false. fact19: Some man does not sink if the fact that it sink and is not weighty is false. fact20: That shedder is not a kind of a Mandaeanism if that calypter does not cake Hydnum and is a tarsal. fact21: Some man is a tarsal if she cramps showiness.

fact1: ¬{AA}{aa} -> ¬{B}{aa} fact2: ¬{G}{c} -> ¬(¬{E}{c} & {F}{c}) fact3: ({JI}{aa} & {A}{aa}) -> ¬{FF}{aa} fact4: {A}{a} -> {B}{aa} fact5: ¬({AB}{fm} & {FA}{fm}) fact6: ¬{AB}{ig} fact7: (¬{C}{aa} & {D}{aa}) -> ¬{A}{aa} fact8: ¬{C}{aa} fact9: (¬{C}{aa} & {D}{aa}) fact10: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({D}{aa} & {AE}{aa}) fact11: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) fact12: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬{C}x fact13: (¬{CR}{gm} & {BJ}{gm}) fact14: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬{A}x fact15: (x): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x fact16: ¬{H}{d} fact17: ¬(¬{E}{c} & {F}{c}) -> {C}{b} fact18: (x): ¬{AA}x -> ¬({AB}x & {D}x) fact19: (x): ¬({B}x & ¬{C}x) -> ¬{B}x fact20: (¬{H}{d} & {I}{d}) -> ¬{G}{c} fact21: (x): {J}x -> {I}x

This convenience sinks.

{B}{aa}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If this convenience does not greet the fact that this convenience does not sink hold. fact2: If that shedder is not a kind of a Mandaeanism that that shedder is both not a Stanton and noncyclical is false. fact3: If this convenience is a scanning and it dotes coated it is not rotary. fact4: If that pseudomonad dotes coated then this convenience sinks. fact5: The fact that the homoeroticism does fasten dissolve and it is an oodles does not hold. fact6: The lemniscus does not fasten dissolve. fact7: If this convenience is not weighty but it is a Labor it do notte coated. fact8: This convenience is non-weighty. fact9: This convenience is not weighty but she/he is a Labor. fact10: If that pseudomonad do notte coated then that this convenience is a kind of a Labor that snuggles Hargeisa is incorrect. fact11: That something greets and does fasten dissolve is incorrect if that do notte coated. fact12: If something does not sink it is not weighty. fact13: This guanine is not a Sinhala and coordinates Hubble. fact14: Something do notte coated if this thing does not sink. fact15: If that something greets and fastens dissolve is wrong then it does not sink. fact16: That calypter does not cake Hydnum. fact17: That bowsprit is weighty if that that shedder is not a Stanton and is noncyclical is false. fact18: If someone does not greet the fact that this one fastens dissolve and this one is a Labor is false. fact19: Some man does not sink if the fact that it sink and is not weighty is false. fact20: That shedder is not a kind of a Mandaeanism if that calypter does not cake Hydnum and is a tarsal. fact21: Some man is a tarsal if she cramps showiness. ; $hypothesis$ = This convenience does not sink. ; $proof$ =

fact11 -> int1: The fact that this convenience does greet and fastens dissolve does not hold if this convenience do notte coated.; fact9 & fact7 -> int2: This convenience do notte coated.; int1 & int2 -> int3: The fact that this convenience greets and fastens dissolve is wrong.; fact15 -> int4: This convenience does not sink if the fact that it greets and it fastens dissolve is wrong.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

The fact that every person is not a kind of an epidemiology and he does not wobble Kendrew is incorrect.

¬((x): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x))

fact1: Everything is not directed and it is not forgetful. fact2: Some man does not thresh emotionlessness and it is not a formalness if it is a kind of a Tachypleus. fact3: That if something does derive that it does not derange tumidity and it is not a kind of a antiquarian is wrong is correct. fact4: Everything does not uncouple Holbrookia and is not physical. fact5: That everything is not nonheritable and not a smarm hold. fact6: Everyone does not familiarise neoclassicism and that one is not gerontological. fact7: Everything is not a kind of an epidemiology and does not wobble Kendrew. fact8: Every person does not rejig Sterculiaceae and is not an anger. fact9: If something is a Hepaticopsida then that thing derives. fact10: Something that is an ideology is a Tachypleus. fact11: Everybody is a Hepaticopsida. fact12: If the fact that something does not derange tumidity and is not a antiquarian is wrong it is not physical. fact13: Everything is not an epidemiology. fact14: Everybody is not a surging and does not familiarise neoclassicism. fact15: Everything is not a academism and does not butter Asanga. fact16: The fact that somebody does not wrangle unpalatableness but that one is Ghanaian is incorrect if that one is not physical. fact17: Everyone is not a Pelycosauria and that person is not Ghanaian. fact18: Everything does not netmail Parashurama and is not a rifled. fact19: Some man is an ideology if the fact that she does not wrangle unpalatableness and she is not non-Ghanaian does not hold.

fact1: (x): (¬{EN}x & ¬{BG}x) fact2: (x): {A}x -> (¬{CF}x & ¬{FC}x) fact3: (x): {H}x -> ¬(¬{F}x & ¬{G}x) fact4: (x): (¬{DG}x & ¬{E}x) fact5: (x): (¬{DA}x & ¬{JB}x) fact6: (x): (¬{N}x & ¬{IC}x) fact7: (x): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact8: (x): (¬{U}x & ¬{HM}x) fact9: (x): {I}x -> {H}x fact10: (x): {B}x -> {A}x fact11: (x): {I}x fact12: (x): ¬(¬{F}x & ¬{G}x) -> ¬{E}x fact13: (x): ¬{AA}x fact14: (x): (¬{DS}x & ¬{N}x) fact15: (x): (¬{DF}x & ¬{HQ}x) fact16: (x): ¬{E}x -> ¬(¬{D}x & {C}x) fact17: (x): (¬{ES}x & ¬{C}x) fact18: (x): (¬{FA}x & ¬{GM}x) fact19: (x): ¬(¬{D}x & {C}x) -> {B}x

Everything does not thresh emotionlessness and that is not a kind of a formalness.

(x): (¬{CF}x & ¬{FC}x)

DISPROVED

PROVED

DISPROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: Everything is not directed and it is not forgetful. fact2: Some man does not thresh emotionlessness and it is not a formalness if it is a kind of a Tachypleus. fact3: That if something does derive that it does not derange tumidity and it is not a kind of a antiquarian is wrong is correct. fact4: Everything does not uncouple Holbrookia and is not physical. fact5: That everything is not nonheritable and not a smarm hold. fact6: Everyone does not familiarise neoclassicism and that one is not gerontological. fact7: Everything is not a kind of an epidemiology and does not wobble Kendrew. fact8: Every person does not rejig Sterculiaceae and is not an anger. fact9: If something is a Hepaticopsida then that thing derives. fact10: Something that is an ideology is a Tachypleus. fact11: Everybody is a Hepaticopsida. fact12: If the fact that something does not derange tumidity and is not a antiquarian is wrong it is not physical. fact13: Everything is not an epidemiology. fact14: Everybody is not a surging and does not familiarise neoclassicism. fact15: Everything is not a academism and does not butter Asanga. fact16: The fact that somebody does not wrangle unpalatableness but that one is Ghanaian is incorrect if that one is not physical. fact17: Everyone is not a Pelycosauria and that person is not Ghanaian. fact18: Everything does not netmail Parashurama and is not a rifled. fact19: Some man is an ideology if the fact that she does not wrangle unpalatableness and she is not non-Ghanaian does not hold. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that every person is not a kind of an epidemiology and he does not wobble Kendrew is incorrect. ; $proof$ =

fact7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This circuit is not a shaken.

¬{B}{a}

fact1: That this starship floods and is not a kind of a personableness is false. fact2: If that gravestone is not an identity then it is a kind of a shaken that is a fecundity. fact3: If something is not a Kansu that the thing is not an identity and is not a fecundity does not hold. fact4: This circuit is a fecundity if there exists something such that that it floods and it is not a personableness does not hold.

fact1: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) fact2: ¬{C}{el} -> ({B}{el} & {A}{el}) fact3: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬(¬{C}x & ¬{A}x) fact4: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {A}{a}

This circuit is not a shaken.

¬{B}{a}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That this starship floods and is not a kind of a personableness is false. fact2: If that gravestone is not an identity then it is a kind of a shaken that is a fecundity. fact3: If something is not a Kansu that the thing is not an identity and is not a fecundity does not hold. fact4: This circuit is a fecundity if there exists something such that that it floods and it is not a personableness does not hold. ; $hypothesis$ = This circuit is not a shaken. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

The fact that this cupper is not a semidiameter is right.

¬{A}{a}

fact1: If that this cupper does not bite alinement and is a kind of a semidiameter does not hold then the goatskin is a semidiameter. fact2: That this cupper is a semidiameter hold. fact3: That grille is a semidiameter. fact4: If something does not bite alinement the thing is not a semidiameter.

fact1: ¬(¬{B}{a} & {A}{a}) -> {A}{cl} fact2: {A}{a} fact3: {A}{ds} fact4: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬{A}x

The fact that this cupper is not a semidiameter is right.

¬{A}{a}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that this cupper does not bite alinement and is a kind of a semidiameter does not hold then the goatskin is a semidiameter. fact2: That this cupper is a semidiameter hold. fact3: That grille is a semidiameter. fact4: If something does not bite alinement the thing is not a semidiameter. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that this cupper is not a semidiameter is right. ; $proof$ =

fact2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This playback is a Mwanza but that is not mucous.

({B}{c} & ¬{A}{c})

fact1: This sucralfate is a flatulency but this thing is not a kind of a Hadean. fact2: This sucralfate is mucous. fact3: This playback is both a Mwanza and non-mucous if that drainboard is not a kind of a Mwanza. fact4: If that drainboard is not a Hadean then this playback is both a Hadean and not a Mwanza. fact5: The oca is not non-mucous. fact6: This playback is a kind of a flatulency.

fact1: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact2: {A}{a} fact3: ¬{B}{b} -> ({B}{c} & ¬{A}{c}) fact4: ¬{AB}{b} -> ({AB}{c} & ¬{B}{c}) fact5: {A}{k} fact6: {AA}{c}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This sucralfate is a flatulency but this thing is not a kind of a Hadean. fact2: This sucralfate is mucous. fact3: This playback is both a Mwanza and non-mucous if that drainboard is not a kind of a Mwanza. fact4: If that drainboard is not a Hadean then this playback is both a Hadean and not a Mwanza. fact5: The oca is not non-mucous. fact6: This playback is a kind of a flatulency. ; $hypothesis$ = This playback is a Mwanza but that is not mucous. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That standardisation occurs.

{C}

fact1: Either this postganglionicness does not occurs or that ticktocking childishness happens or both. fact2: The hydricness does not happens. fact3: That standardisation does not occurs if this postganglionicness does not occurs and/or that ticktocking childishness does not occurs. fact4: The fact that that notthis specification but that drawing reevaluation happens is not right is true. fact5: This postganglionicness does not occurs if the fact that this specification does not occurs but that drawing reevaluation happens is wrong. fact6: This postganglionicness does not happens if that drawing reevaluation does not occurs. fact7: The myopathicness does not happens if that notthe devilizing bellow but that overhead occurs does not hold.

fact1: (¬{B} v {A}) fact2: ¬{JI} fact3: (¬{B} v ¬{A}) -> ¬{C} fact4: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) fact5: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} fact6: ¬{AB} -> ¬{B} fact7: ¬(¬{HM} & {BN}) -> ¬{BR}

DISPROVED

DISPROVED

$facts$ = fact1: Either this postganglionicness does not occurs or that ticktocking childishness happens or both. fact2: The hydricness does not happens. fact3: That standardisation does not occurs if this postganglionicness does not occurs and/or that ticktocking childishness does not occurs. fact4: The fact that that notthis specification but that drawing reevaluation happens is not right is true. fact5: This postganglionicness does not occurs if the fact that this specification does not occurs but that drawing reevaluation happens is wrong. fact6: This postganglionicness does not happens if that drawing reevaluation does not occurs. fact7: The myopathicness does not happens if that notthe devilizing bellow but that overhead occurs does not hold. ; $hypothesis$ = That standardisation occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact5 & fact4 -> int1: This postganglionicness does not occurs.; int1 -> int2: Either this postganglionicness does not happens or that ticktocking childishness does not occurs or both.; int2 & fact3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

There exists someone such that if it is a kind of a dishonourableness then it does reset Ticonderoga.

(Ex): {A}x -> {C}x

fact1: That reserves is bibliophilic and is a kind of a Stalino if the synergy is not an edible. fact2: If someone is not a dishonourableness then that one does not reset Ticonderoga. fact3: This organs is a Sanger if this organs resets Ticonderoga and/or it is not a thwack. fact4: This organs is not a dishonourableness if that reserves is both a rancidity and bibliophilic. fact5: That this organs is Algerian is right. fact6: There exists no man such that it is not Meridian and it is a kind of an entitlement. fact7: There exists something such that if it is bibliophilic it is a kind of a dishonourableness. fact8: This organs is a dishonourableness and/or he/she is bibliophilic. fact9: This organs is a squiggle. fact10: If this confidante is not a kind of a procuress then that reserves is a kind of a rancidity. fact11: If the fact that the fact that this confidante is a kind of non-Meridian an entitlement does not hold is true it is not a kind of a procuress. fact12: This organs is not bibliophilic. fact13: There exists something such that if it is a kind of a dishonourableness that it is not bibliophilic does not hold.

fact1: ¬{G}{d} -> ({B}{b} & {F}{b}) fact2: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬{C}x fact3: ({C}{a} v ¬{IA}{a}) -> {FF}{a} fact4: ({D}{b} & {B}{b}) -> ¬{A}{a} fact5: {DE}{a} fact6: (x): ¬(¬{I}x & {H}x) fact7: (Ex): {B}x -> {A}x fact8: ({A}{a} v {B}{a}) fact9: {AS}{a} fact10: ¬{E}{c} -> {D}{b} fact11: ¬(¬{I}{c} & {H}{c}) -> ¬{E}{c} fact12: ¬{B}{a} fact13: (Ex): {A}x -> {B}x

That this organs is viviparous or does not reset Ticonderoga or both hold.

({BR}{a} v ¬{C}{a})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That reserves is bibliophilic and is a kind of a Stalino if the synergy is not an edible. fact2: If someone is not a dishonourableness then that one does not reset Ticonderoga. fact3: This organs is a Sanger if this organs resets Ticonderoga and/or it is not a thwack. fact4: This organs is not a dishonourableness if that reserves is both a rancidity and bibliophilic. fact5: That this organs is Algerian is right. fact6: There exists no man such that it is not Meridian and it is a kind of an entitlement. fact7: There exists something such that if it is bibliophilic it is a kind of a dishonourableness. fact8: This organs is a dishonourableness and/or he/she is bibliophilic. fact9: This organs is a squiggle. fact10: If this confidante is not a kind of a procuress then that reserves is a kind of a rancidity. fact11: If the fact that the fact that this confidante is a kind of non-Meridian an entitlement does not hold is true it is not a kind of a procuress. fact12: This organs is not bibliophilic. fact13: There exists something such that if it is a kind of a dishonourableness that it is not bibliophilic does not hold. ; $hypothesis$ = There exists someone such that if it is a kind of a dishonourableness then it does reset Ticonderoga. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

There is some person such that that it is non-totipotent and it is not a surplus does not hold.

(Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x)

fact1: if that this commentator details Hamamelidoxylon and is a kind of a fine is false then there exists some person such that she/he is extinguishable.

fact1: fake_formula

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: if that this commentator details Hamamelidoxylon and is a kind of a fine is false then there exists some person such that she/he is extinguishable. ; $hypothesis$ = There is some person such that that it is non-totipotent and it is not a surplus does not hold. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This roundhead is not a arccotangent.

¬{B}{b}

fact1: That this ornithopter decries shaytan is right. fact2: This ornithopter does not focus demyelination and does not speed Sphecoidea. fact3: This ornithopter does not kink 27 and is not a arccotangent. fact4: This ornithopter is a kind of a arccotangent if this roundhead does not scavenge Uca and the one does not kink 27. fact5: This ornithopter is dermic. fact6: If this ornithopter does not kink 27 and is not a arccotangent then that this roundhead scavenges Uca is right. fact7: This roundhead is not a appreciativeness and is not galvanic. fact8: This ornithopter does not kink 27. fact9: This roundhead kinks 27 if this ornithopter does not scavenge Uca and is not a kind of a arccotangent. fact10: This ornithopter is a arccotangent if this roundhead does not kink 27 and does not scavenge Uca. fact11: If this ornithopter does not scavenge Uca and kinks 27 this roundhead is a arccotangent. fact12: If this ornithopter is not a kind of a arccotangent and that does not scavenge Uca this roundhead kinks 27. fact13: That this roundhead is a arccotangent if this ornithopter does not scavenge Uca and it does not kink 27 is true. fact14: The ctenidium does not kink 27 and it does not suburbanise Condorcet. fact15: This ornithopter does not incurvate Pashto and is not a Iridaceae. fact16: This ornithopter kinks 27 if that this roundhead does not scavenge Uca and it is not a arccotangent is right. fact17: This ornithopter is not a arccotangent and does not kink 27. fact18: This ornithopter scavenges Uca if this roundhead is not a arccotangent and does not kink 27. fact19: This roundhead scavenges Uca. fact20: This ornithopter does not scavenge Uca and it does not kink 27. fact21: This ornithopter scavenges Uca if this roundhead does not kink 27 and she is not a arccotangent.

fact1: {FC}{a} fact2: (¬{CG}{a} & ¬{EM}{a}) fact3: (¬{AB}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) fact4: (¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) -> {B}{a} fact5: {FU}{a} fact6: (¬{AB}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> {AA}{b} fact7: (¬{JC}{b} & ¬{EI}{b}) fact8: ¬{AB}{a} fact9: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> {AB}{b} fact10: (¬{AB}{b} & ¬{AA}{b}) -> {B}{a} fact11: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} fact12: (¬{B}{a} & ¬{AA}{a}) -> {AB}{b} fact13: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} fact14: (¬{AB}{il} & ¬{C}{il}) fact15: (¬{FM}{a} & ¬{JE}{a}) fact16: (¬{AA}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) -> {AB}{a} fact17: (¬{B}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact18: (¬{B}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) -> {AA}{a} fact19: {AA}{b} fact20: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact21: (¬{AB}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) -> {AA}{a}

DISPROVED

DISPROVED

$facts$ = fact1: That this ornithopter decries shaytan is right. fact2: This ornithopter does not focus demyelination and does not speed Sphecoidea. fact3: This ornithopter does not kink 27 and is not a arccotangent. fact4: This ornithopter is a kind of a arccotangent if this roundhead does not scavenge Uca and the one does not kink 27. fact5: This ornithopter is dermic. fact6: If this ornithopter does not kink 27 and is not a arccotangent then that this roundhead scavenges Uca is right. fact7: This roundhead is not a appreciativeness and is not galvanic. fact8: This ornithopter does not kink 27. fact9: This roundhead kinks 27 if this ornithopter does not scavenge Uca and is not a kind of a arccotangent. fact10: This ornithopter is a arccotangent if this roundhead does not kink 27 and does not scavenge Uca. fact11: If this ornithopter does not scavenge Uca and kinks 27 this roundhead is a arccotangent. fact12: If this ornithopter is not a kind of a arccotangent and that does not scavenge Uca this roundhead kinks 27. fact13: That this roundhead is a arccotangent if this ornithopter does not scavenge Uca and it does not kink 27 is true. fact14: The ctenidium does not kink 27 and it does not suburbanise Condorcet. fact15: This ornithopter does not incurvate Pashto and is not a Iridaceae. fact16: This ornithopter kinks 27 if that this roundhead does not scavenge Uca and it is not a arccotangent is right. fact17: This ornithopter is not a arccotangent and does not kink 27. fact18: This ornithopter scavenges Uca if this roundhead is not a arccotangent and does not kink 27. fact19: This roundhead scavenges Uca. fact20: This ornithopter does not scavenge Uca and it does not kink 27. fact21: This ornithopter scavenges Uca if this roundhead does not kink 27 and she is not a arccotangent. ; $hypothesis$ = This roundhead is not a arccotangent. ; $proof$ =

fact13 & fact20 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That Rush is a kind of a philistinism.

{B}{b}

fact1: That that embrocation is a kind of shrinkable one that does want Cimex does not hold. fact2: If that embrocation does want Cimex that Rush is a kind of a philistinism. fact3: The fact that that Rush wants Cimex and is not a philistinism is false. fact4: That trundle is a maidenhood and is dependent if this brownie does not zap Rynchopidae. fact5: That that that embrocation is shrinkable and does not want Cimex is right is incorrect. fact6: If something is not a Macrocephalon then it does not sight temporal. fact7: If that trundle is a maidenhood then the fact that that embrocation is non-prognathic and/or does not forgo does not hold. fact8: If that something is non-prognathic or that does not forgo or both does not hold that is not a Macrocephalon. fact9: That Rush is shrinkable. fact10: If the fact that that embrocation is shrinkable but it does not want Cimex is incorrect then that Rush is a philistinism. fact11: If the fact that that embrocation sights temporal is false then that either that Rush is not extended or this thing dehorns Hunnemannia or both does not hold. fact12: If that someone is not extended and/or does dehorn Hunnemannia is wrong then the one is not a philistinism. fact13: If the fact that Zane does not uncompress Fargo but that thing zaps Rynchopidae is incorrect this brownie does not zaps Rynchopidae.

fact1: ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact2: {AB}{a} -> {B}{b} fact3: ¬({AB}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) fact4: ¬{J}{d} -> ({H}{c} & {I}{c}) fact5: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact6: (x): ¬{E}x -> ¬{D}x fact7: {H}{c} -> ¬(¬{G}{a} v ¬{F}{a}) fact8: (x): ¬(¬{G}x v ¬{F}x) -> ¬{E}x fact9: {AA}{b} fact10: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} fact11: ¬{D}{a} -> ¬({A}{b} v {C}{b}) fact12: (x): ¬({A}x v {C}x) -> ¬{B}x fact13: ¬(¬{L}{e} & {J}{e}) -> ¬{J}{d}

That Rush is not a kind of a philistinism.

¬{B}{b}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That that embrocation is a kind of shrinkable one that does want Cimex does not hold. fact2: If that embrocation does want Cimex that Rush is a kind of a philistinism. fact3: The fact that that Rush wants Cimex and is not a philistinism is false. fact4: That trundle is a maidenhood and is dependent if this brownie does not zap Rynchopidae. fact5: That that that embrocation is shrinkable and does not want Cimex is right is incorrect. fact6: If something is not a Macrocephalon then it does not sight temporal. fact7: If that trundle is a maidenhood then the fact that that embrocation is non-prognathic and/or does not forgo does not hold. fact8: If that something is non-prognathic or that does not forgo or both does not hold that is not a Macrocephalon. fact9: That Rush is shrinkable. fact10: If the fact that that embrocation is shrinkable but it does not want Cimex is incorrect then that Rush is a philistinism. fact11: If the fact that that embrocation sights temporal is false then that either that Rush is not extended or this thing dehorns Hunnemannia or both does not hold. fact12: If that someone is not extended and/or does dehorn Hunnemannia is wrong then the one is not a philistinism. fact13: If the fact that Zane does not uncompress Fargo but that thing zaps Rynchopidae is incorrect this brownie does not zaps Rynchopidae. ; $hypothesis$ = That Rush is a kind of a philistinism. ; $proof$ =

fact10 & fact5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

Let's assume that this neotenousness occurs.

{A}

fact1: That if this Marocness occurs that brunetness does not happens and that etiology occurs hold. fact2: This spying occurs. fact3: That that etiology and that brunetness occurs does not hold. fact4: That brunetness does not happens if that that etiology happens and that brunetness occurs is incorrect. fact5: The pinocle happens. fact6: That this neotenousness occurs yields that that brunetness happens. fact7: That this Marocness happens is caused by that this spying does not happens and this obscenity does not happens. fact8: This non-neotenousness is prevented by that notthat brunetness but that etiology happens.

fact1: {D} -> (¬{B} & {C}) fact2: {F} fact3: ¬({C} & {B}) fact4: ¬({C} & {B}) -> ¬{B} fact5: {FI} fact6: {A} -> {B} fact7: (¬{F} & ¬{E}) -> {D} fact8: (¬{B} & {C}) -> {A}

Let's assume that this neotenousness occurs.

{A}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That if this Marocness occurs that brunetness does not happens and that etiology occurs hold. fact2: This spying occurs. fact3: That that etiology and that brunetness occurs does not hold. fact4: That brunetness does not happens if that that etiology happens and that brunetness occurs is incorrect. fact5: The pinocle happens. fact6: That this neotenousness occurs yields that that brunetness happens. fact7: That this Marocness happens is caused by that this spying does not happens and this obscenity does not happens. fact8: This non-neotenousness is prevented by that notthat brunetness but that etiology happens. ; $hypothesis$ = Let's assume that this neotenousness occurs. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that this neotenousness occurs.; fact6 & assump1 -> int1: That brunetness occurs.; fact3 & fact4 -> int2: That brunetness does not happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That that Basotho is a kind of a Crotalidae is right if it does clew lateral.

{A}{a} -> {C}{a}

fact1: Something is not a twins if the fact that this thing is a Bai and this thing is a kind of a twins does not hold. fact2: If something does prompt Turdus but it is not a Saturday then it clews lateral. fact3: That Basotho conquers catena. fact4: That Basotho is not crannied and/or that person does not incandesce Gettysburg. fact5: Someone is not a kind of a stagecraft if he/she is not crannied. fact6: If that Basotho is estrous and is not a Columbus that Basotho is a kind of a Crotalidae. fact7: If that Basotho is not a stagecraft then that this Roneo is a Bai that is a kind of a twins is wrong. fact8: The oilman does not clew lateral. fact9: If some man does reassail accelerando and it does clew lateral then it is not a Crotalidae. fact10: If some man is not a twins then it prompts Turdus and is not a kind of a Saturday. fact11: That Basotho does not reassail accelerando. fact12: That soundbox scents Yuan and is not a Elul. fact13: the accelerandoes not reassail Basotho. fact14: Someone is not a stagecraft if he does not incandesce Gettysburg. fact15: That archbishopric is a Crotalidae. fact16: This Roneo adopts clientele and the one reassails accelerando. fact17: That Basotho is a Amaryllidaceae.

fact1: (x): ¬({H}x & {F}x) -> ¬{F}x fact2: (x): ({E}x & ¬{D}x) -> {A}x fact3: {GO}{a} fact4: (¬{I}{a} v ¬{J}{a}) fact5: (x): ¬{I}x -> ¬{G}x fact6: ({HR}{a} & ¬{CG}{a}) -> {C}{a} fact7: ¬{G}{a} -> ¬({H}{bo} & {F}{bo}) fact8: ¬{A}{ee} fact9: (x): ({B}x & {A}x) -> ¬{C}x fact10: (x): ¬{F}x -> ({E}x & ¬{D}x) fact11: ¬{B}{a} fact12: ({IM}{gu} & ¬{AQ}{gu}) fact13: ¬{AB}{ab} fact14: (x): ¬{J}x -> ¬{G}x fact15: {C}{fk} fact16: ({K}{bo} & {B}{bo}) fact17: {CJ}{a}

This Roneo is not a kind of a Crotalidae.

¬{C}{bo}

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: Something is not a twins if the fact that this thing is a Bai and this thing is a kind of a twins does not hold. fact2: If something does prompt Turdus but it is not a Saturday then it clews lateral. fact3: That Basotho conquers catena. fact4: That Basotho is not crannied and/or that person does not incandesce Gettysburg. fact5: Someone is not a kind of a stagecraft if he/she is not crannied. fact6: If that Basotho is estrous and is not a Columbus that Basotho is a kind of a Crotalidae. fact7: If that Basotho is not a stagecraft then that this Roneo is a Bai that is a kind of a twins is wrong. fact8: The oilman does not clew lateral. fact9: If some man does reassail accelerando and it does clew lateral then it is not a Crotalidae. fact10: If some man is not a twins then it prompts Turdus and is not a kind of a Saturday. fact11: That Basotho does not reassail accelerando. fact12: That soundbox scents Yuan and is not a Elul. fact13: the accelerandoes not reassail Basotho. fact14: Someone is not a stagecraft if he does not incandesce Gettysburg. fact15: That archbishopric is a Crotalidae. fact16: This Roneo adopts clientele and the one reassails accelerando. fact17: That Basotho is a Amaryllidaceae. ; $hypothesis$ = That that Basotho is a kind of a Crotalidae is right if it does clew lateral. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

There is some person such that if the person is not a trillion and does undertake bps then the person is not atrioventricular.

(Ex): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x

fact1: That there is something such that if that does not joy and that is a Sedna then that is not a kind of a puerility hold. fact2: There exists something such that if that is a trillion and undertakes bps that is not atrioventricular. fact3: If someone that does not ascertain Antalya is a kind of a Enki then the one does not inset suspicion. fact4: Someone is not a kind of a Geococcyx if that one is not hypognathous and that one undertakes bps. fact5: This ayatollah is atrioventricular if it is not a trillion and undertakes bps. fact6: There is some person such that if this person is not a liberalness and this person is a Jainist then this person does not crown bored. fact7: If this ayatollah is not a trillion but it joys it is not a exegesis. fact8: There is something such that if it does not womanize nursed and it references Tarquin then it does not dwell. fact9: If this ayatollah is not a kind of a trillion but the one undertakes bps then the one is not atrioventricular. fact10: There exists some man such that if the fact that the one does not yell Saqqara and the one sustains lasciviousness hold the one is not a Sukur. fact11: This ayatollah is non-atrioventricular if this ayatollah is a kind of a trillion and this thing undertakes bps. fact12: There exists something such that if it is non-faucal and it is not non-Stravinskian it does not ghettoize 1. fact13: There exists something such that if the thing is not a trillion and the thing undertakes bps then the thing is atrioventricular.

fact1: (Ex): (¬{BB}x & {GA}x) -> ¬{GN}x fact2: (Ex): ({AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x fact3: (x): (¬{ID}x & {GP}x) -> ¬{FL}x fact4: (x): (¬{GJ}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{ET}x fact5: (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} fact6: (Ex): (¬{DM}x & {JC}x) -> ¬{JD}x fact7: (¬{AA}{aa} & {BB}{aa}) -> ¬{BM}{aa} fact8: (Ex): (¬{FD}x & {AJ}x) -> ¬{GT}x fact9: (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} fact10: (Ex): (¬{M}x & {CO}x) -> ¬{FH}x fact11: ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} fact12: (Ex): (¬{HF}x & {AN}x) -> ¬{EA}x fact13: (Ex): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x

The Muller is not a Geococcyx if it is not hypognathous and it undertakes bps.

(¬{GJ}{bj} & {AB}{bj}) -> ¬{ET}{bj}

PROVED

PROVED

PROVED

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: That there is something such that if that does not joy and that is a Sedna then that is not a kind of a puerility hold. fact2: There exists something such that if that is a trillion and undertakes bps that is not atrioventricular. fact3: If someone that does not ascertain Antalya is a kind of a Enki then the one does not inset suspicion. fact4: Someone is not a kind of a Geococcyx if that one is not hypognathous and that one undertakes bps. fact5: This ayatollah is atrioventricular if it is not a trillion and undertakes bps. fact6: There is some person such that if this person is not a liberalness and this person is a Jainist then this person does not crown bored. fact7: If this ayatollah is not a trillion but it joys it is not a exegesis. fact8: There is something such that if it does not womanize nursed and it references Tarquin then it does not dwell. fact9: If this ayatollah is not a kind of a trillion but the one undertakes bps then the one is not atrioventricular. fact10: There exists some man such that if the fact that the one does not yell Saqqara and the one sustains lasciviousness hold the one is not a Sukur. fact11: This ayatollah is non-atrioventricular if this ayatollah is a kind of a trillion and this thing undertakes bps. fact12: There exists something such that if it is non-faucal and it is not non-Stravinskian it does not ghettoize 1. fact13: There exists something such that if the thing is not a trillion and the thing undertakes bps then the thing is atrioventricular. ; $hypothesis$ = There is some person such that if the person is not a trillion and does undertake bps then the person is not atrioventricular. ; $proof$ =

fact9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That acclimatizing Knossos does not occurs.

¬{D}

fact1: That redeeming occurs if this escapade happens. fact2: The catapulting BD does not happens. fact3: This escapade occurs but the intriguing Echeneididae does not happens. fact4: This electrocuting friskiness and the non-unbeneficedness happens. fact5: That that acclimatizing Knossos happens is caused by that redeeming.

fact1: {A} -> {C} fact2: ¬{DI} fact3: ({A} & ¬{B}) fact4: ({GA} & ¬{BM}) fact5: {C} -> {D}

DISPROVED

DISPROVED

$facts$ = fact1: That redeeming occurs if this escapade happens. fact2: The catapulting BD does not happens. fact3: This escapade occurs but the intriguing Echeneididae does not happens. fact4: This electrocuting friskiness and the non-unbeneficedness happens. fact5: That that acclimatizing Knossos happens is caused by that redeeming. ; $hypothesis$ = That acclimatizing Knossos does not occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact3 -> int1: The fact that this escapade occurs hold.; int1 & fact1 -> int2: That redeeming occurs.; int2 & fact5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This emporium does button haler and is a Annapurna.

({B}{b} & {A}{b})

fact1: This emporium is not a incorruptibility. fact2: This emporium does button haler if that this adulterator does not equal Mutsuhito but that person is cataphatic is false. fact3: That longbowman is a kind of a incorruptibility. fact4: This emporium is a Annapurna if the one is not a incorruptibility.

fact1: ¬{C}{b} fact2: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} fact3: {C}{in} fact4: ¬{C}{b} -> {A}{b}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This emporium is not a incorruptibility. fact2: This emporium does button haler if that this adulterator does not equal Mutsuhito but that person is cataphatic is false. fact3: That longbowman is a kind of a incorruptibility. fact4: This emporium is a Annapurna if the one is not a incorruptibility. ; $hypothesis$ = This emporium does button haler and is a Annapurna. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That frontal is a sub and that thing is gutsy.

({C}{a} & {D}{a})

fact1: That frontal is not noncrucial if that flick is not gutsy. fact2: The pallidum is a kind of a Masai. fact3: Something is a sub if the thing is noncrucial. fact4: The fact that somebody is a sub that is gutsy is incorrect if it is not a Masai. fact5: Lorenzo is a sub if that that frontal is not a Masai and is not a sub does not hold. fact6: That frontal is gutsy. fact7: The fact that someone is not a kind of a Masai and it is not a sub is wrong if it is not noncrucial. fact8: That frontal is not a kind of a Masai if that that flick is not a Leguminosae and/or it is not a kind of a Masai is wrong.

fact1: ¬{D}{b} -> ¬{B}{a} fact2: {A}{gh} fact3: (x): {B}x -> {C}x fact4: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({C}x & {D}x) fact5: ¬(¬{A}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> {C}{fp} fact6: {D}{a} fact7: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & ¬{C}x) fact8: ¬(¬{E}{b} v ¬{A}{b}) -> ¬{A}{a}

Lorenzo is a sub.

{C}{fp}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: That frontal is not noncrucial if that flick is not gutsy. fact2: The pallidum is a kind of a Masai. fact3: Something is a sub if the thing is noncrucial. fact4: The fact that somebody is a sub that is gutsy is incorrect if it is not a Masai. fact5: Lorenzo is a sub if that that frontal is not a Masai and is not a sub does not hold. fact6: That frontal is gutsy. fact7: The fact that someone is not a kind of a Masai and it is not a sub is wrong if it is not noncrucial. fact8: That frontal is not a kind of a Masai if that that flick is not a Leguminosae and/or it is not a kind of a Masai is wrong. ; $hypothesis$ = That frontal is a sub and that thing is gutsy. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

This ethernet is estrogenic and/or that thing modifies.

({D}{a} v {C}{a})

fact1: The fact that something is estrogenic and it is a kind of a Oxybelis is not correct if it is not a mural. fact2: If that bitumastic is both a hypoadrenocorticism and a mural that wheelchair is not a hypoadrenocorticism. fact3: If this ethernet is not a R or it is a basset or both then it is a Dasyatidae. fact4: This ethernet is lotic. fact5: This Merlot is not non-estrogenic and/or that thing guides 1950s. fact6: This ethernet is a hypoadrenocorticism. fact7: That something is estrogenic and/or that thing modifies is false if that thing is not a theodicy. fact8: This ethernet is not a theodicy if that wheelchair is not a kind of a hypoadrenocorticism. fact9: The genip either is not dacitic or does form or both. fact10: This ethernet is sartorial. fact11: The fact that this ethernet modifies hold if this is not a theodicy. fact12: If that that midrib does not disobey or modifies or both is right that that midrib is methylated hold. fact13: The fact that everything is not a kind of a mural hold. fact14: This ethernet is a hypoadrenocorticism and/or it moistens Ruskin. fact15: That the fact that this shoebill is a theodicy that does not modify does not hold is right if this ethernet is not estrogenic. fact16: Either this ethernet is a theodicy or it is a hypoadrenocorticism or both. fact17: This ethernet is not non-graceful. fact18: Ariel is tight if that Ariel is not a condescendingness or this one shoots LBJ or both hold. fact19: This ethernet is a Halimodendron and/or that one is a kind of an edged. fact20: This ethernet modifies if this ethernet is not a theodicy and/or is a hypoadrenocorticism.

fact1: (x): ¬{E}x -> ¬({D}x & {F}x) fact2: ({B}{c} & {E}{c}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact3: (¬{HF}{a} v {DD}{a}) -> {EO}{a} fact4: {DG}{a} fact5: ({D}{ee} v {BU}{ee}) fact6: {B}{a} fact7: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({D}x v {C}x) fact8: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬{A}{a} fact9: (¬{N}{dp} v {K}{dp}) fact10: {HU}{a} fact11: ¬{A}{a} -> {C}{a} fact12: (¬{EU}{aq} v {C}{aq}) -> {BL}{aq} fact13: (x): ¬{E}x fact14: ({B}{a} v {BF}{a}) fact15: ¬{D}{a} -> ¬({A}{dh} & ¬{C}{dh}) fact16: ({A}{a} v {B}{a}) fact17: {JI}{a} fact18: (¬{HP}{da} v {HH}{da}) -> {FL}{da} fact19: ({IA}{a} v {CH}{a}) fact20: (¬{A}{a} v {B}{a}) -> {C}{a}

That this ethernet either is estrogenic or modifies or both is false.

¬({D}{a} v {C}{a})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that something is estrogenic and it is a kind of a Oxybelis is not correct if it is not a mural. fact2: If that bitumastic is both a hypoadrenocorticism and a mural that wheelchair is not a hypoadrenocorticism. fact3: If this ethernet is not a R or it is a basset or both then it is a Dasyatidae. fact4: This ethernet is lotic. fact5: This Merlot is not non-estrogenic and/or that thing guides 1950s. fact6: This ethernet is a hypoadrenocorticism. fact7: That something is estrogenic and/or that thing modifies is false if that thing is not a theodicy. fact8: This ethernet is not a theodicy if that wheelchair is not a kind of a hypoadrenocorticism. fact9: The genip either is not dacitic or does form or both. fact10: This ethernet is sartorial. fact11: The fact that this ethernet modifies hold if this is not a theodicy. fact12: If that that midrib does not disobey or modifies or both is right that that midrib is methylated hold. fact13: The fact that everything is not a kind of a mural hold. fact14: This ethernet is a hypoadrenocorticism and/or it moistens Ruskin. fact15: That the fact that this shoebill is a theodicy that does not modify does not hold is right if this ethernet is not estrogenic. fact16: Either this ethernet is a theodicy or it is a hypoadrenocorticism or both. fact17: This ethernet is not non-graceful. fact18: Ariel is tight if that Ariel is not a condescendingness or this one shoots LBJ or both hold. fact19: This ethernet is a Halimodendron and/or that one is a kind of an edged. fact20: This ethernet modifies if this ethernet is not a theodicy and/or is a hypoadrenocorticism. ; $hypothesis$ = This ethernet is estrogenic and/or that thing modifies. ; $proof$ =

fact6 -> int1: The fact that this ethernet is not a theodicy or a hypoadrenocorticism or both is correct.; int1 & fact20 -> int2: This ethernet modifies.; int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This cranberry is an amphibian.

{C}{a}

fact1: The fact that Rosie is a kind of a UFO is correct if this topknot is a Hughes. fact2: Something is a Dumuzi but not a patois if it is a UFO. fact3: The fact that this Attilio is a kind of a Vasari is right. fact4: The fact that this cranberry is not Orthodox is not wrong if this cranberry does not knock credited. fact5: Something is not a kind of an amphibian if this thing does not repent. fact6: If some man is not a patois then it is not an amphibian and is a kind of a vulgarism. fact7: This cranberry is not a vulgarism. fact8: The fact that the carport does not repent is right. fact9: If Rosie is an amphibian then that this cranberry is an amphibian hold. fact10: If that something does refine is true then that thing does not pocked and is not a kind of a worse. fact11: If Rosie is a kind of a UFO this cranberry is a kind of a UFO. fact12: If this requester is unifilar then this topknot is a Hughes. fact13: The fact that the fact that this topknot is not a patois and repents is wrong is not incorrect if this requester is not a Dumuzi. fact14: If there is something such that this bilgeses then that navicular bilgeses and is not non-dural. fact15: Rosie is not a kind of a vulgarism if that this topknot is not a patois but the one repents is incorrect. fact16: If this cranberry is not a kind of an amphibian but it is a vulgarism Hunter does not repent. fact17: That navicular does refine if that she is uremic and she does not refine is false. fact18: If that navicular does not pocked then this requester is unifilar and/or this person is a Chomsky. fact19: This cranberry does not repent if it is not a geology. fact20: If this cranberry is not a kind of a vulgarism then this does not repent. fact21: If some person bilgeses the fact that this one is a kind of uremic person that does not refine does not hold. fact22: This Attilio bilgeses if this Attilio is a Vasari.

fact1: {G}{c} -> {F}{b} fact2: (x): {F}x -> ({E}x & ¬{D}x) fact3: {P}{f} fact4: ¬{GQ}{a} -> ¬{CJ}{a} fact5: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬{C}x fact6: (x): ¬{D}x -> (¬{C}x & {A}x) fact7: ¬{A}{a} fact8: ¬{B}{cu} fact9: {C}{b} -> {C}{a} fact10: (x): {L}x -> (¬{J}x & ¬{K}x) fact11: {F}{b} -> {F}{a} fact12: {I}{d} -> {G}{c} fact13: ¬{E}{d} -> ¬(¬{D}{c} & {B}{c}) fact14: (x): {M}x -> ({M}{e} & {O}{e}) fact15: ¬(¬{D}{c} & {B}{c}) -> ¬{A}{b} fact16: (¬{C}{a} & {A}{a}) -> ¬{B}{ef} fact17: ¬({N}{e} & ¬{L}{e}) -> {L}{e} fact18: ¬{J}{e} -> ({I}{d} v {H}{d}) fact19: ¬{IG}{a} -> ¬{B}{a} fact20: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{B}{a} fact21: (x): {M}x -> ¬({N}x & ¬{L}x) fact22: {P}{f} -> {M}{f}

Hunter does not repent.

¬{B}{ef}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The fact that Rosie is a kind of a UFO is correct if this topknot is a Hughes. fact2: Something is a Dumuzi but not a patois if it is a UFO. fact3: The fact that this Attilio is a kind of a Vasari is right. fact4: The fact that this cranberry is not Orthodox is not wrong if this cranberry does not knock credited. fact5: Something is not a kind of an amphibian if this thing does not repent. fact6: If some man is not a patois then it is not an amphibian and is a kind of a vulgarism. fact7: This cranberry is not a vulgarism. fact8: The fact that the carport does not repent is right. fact9: If Rosie is an amphibian then that this cranberry is an amphibian hold. fact10: If that something does refine is true then that thing does not pocked and is not a kind of a worse. fact11: If Rosie is a kind of a UFO this cranberry is a kind of a UFO. fact12: If this requester is unifilar then this topknot is a Hughes. fact13: The fact that the fact that this topknot is not a patois and repents is wrong is not incorrect if this requester is not a Dumuzi. fact14: If there is something such that this bilgeses then that navicular bilgeses and is not non-dural. fact15: Rosie is not a kind of a vulgarism if that this topknot is not a patois but the one repents is incorrect. fact16: If this cranberry is not a kind of an amphibian but it is a vulgarism Hunter does not repent. fact17: That navicular does refine if that she is uremic and she does not refine is false. fact18: If that navicular does not pocked then this requester is unifilar and/or this person is a Chomsky. fact19: This cranberry does not repent if it is not a geology. fact20: If this cranberry is not a kind of a vulgarism then this does not repent. fact21: If some person bilgeses the fact that this one is a kind of uremic person that does not refine does not hold. fact22: This Attilio bilgeses if this Attilio is a Vasari. ; $hypothesis$ = This cranberry is an amphibian. ; $proof$ =

fact20 & fact7 -> int1: This cranberry does not repent.; fact5 -> int2: If this cranberry does not repent then the one is not a kind of an amphibian.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

There exists something such that if this is a porphyria then this is not a Cortaderia and this is a porphyria.

(Ex): {B}x -> (¬{A}x & {B}x)

fact1: If that anticonvulsant is a porphyria that anticonvulsant is not an alertness but it is a porphyria. fact2: This jongleur is a kind of a Cortaderia that is a porphyria if that anticonvulsant does not lot Edaphosauridae. fact3: There exists someone such that if this one is hemal then this one does not smatter and is hemal. fact4: That anticonvulsant is not hemal. fact5: Someone is not a Benin if that this one is a kind of a Benin and this one is not a kind of a combustible is incorrect. fact6: That anticonvulsant is not a kind of a Munchhausen and is a Aton. fact7: That anticonvulsant is not a kind of a Cortaderia. fact8: That anticonvulsant does pass ethnos. fact9: If that that anticonvulsant is a nonmetal but this thing does not title Woodward does not hold this thing does not lot Edaphosauridae. fact10: There exists some man such that if it is a porphyria it is a kind of a Cortaderia that is a porphyria. fact11: This colonist is not brasslike and is a kind of a Cortaderia. fact12: That anticonvulsant is not antiseptic. fact13: This jongleur is both not a talks and an eager. fact14: If that anticonvulsant is a porphyria it is a Cortaderia that is a porphyria. fact15: That something is both a Benin and not a combustible is incorrect if this thing is not a talks.

fact1: {B}{a} -> (¬{EC}{a} & {B}{a}) fact2: ¬{D}{a} -> ({A}{fq} & {B}{fq}) fact3: (Ex): {IO}x -> (¬{S}x & {IO}x) fact4: ¬{IO}{a} fact5: (x): ¬({HD}x & ¬{C}x) -> ¬{HD}x fact6: (¬{HL}{a} & {CK}{a}) fact7: ¬{A}{a} fact8: {GL}{a} fact9: ¬({E}{a} & ¬{F}{a}) -> ¬{D}{a} fact10: (Ex): {B}x -> ({A}x & {B}x) fact11: (¬{CO}{jk} & {A}{jk}) fact12: ¬{HB}{a} fact13: (¬{G}{fq} & {H}{fq}) fact14: {B}{a} -> ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact15: (x): ¬{G}x -> ¬({HD}x & ¬{C}x)

This jongleur is not a Benin but it is a Cortaderia.

(¬{HD}{fq} & {A}{fq})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that anticonvulsant is a porphyria that anticonvulsant is not an alertness but it is a porphyria. fact2: This jongleur is a kind of a Cortaderia that is a porphyria if that anticonvulsant does not lot Edaphosauridae. fact3: There exists someone such that if this one is hemal then this one does not smatter and is hemal. fact4: That anticonvulsant is not hemal. fact5: Someone is not a Benin if that this one is a kind of a Benin and this one is not a kind of a combustible is incorrect. fact6: That anticonvulsant is not a kind of a Munchhausen and is a Aton. fact7: That anticonvulsant is not a kind of a Cortaderia. fact8: That anticonvulsant does pass ethnos. fact9: If that that anticonvulsant is a nonmetal but this thing does not title Woodward does not hold this thing does not lot Edaphosauridae. fact10: There exists some man such that if it is a porphyria it is a kind of a Cortaderia that is a porphyria. fact11: This colonist is not brasslike and is a kind of a Cortaderia. fact12: That anticonvulsant is not antiseptic. fact13: This jongleur is both not a talks and an eager. fact14: If that anticonvulsant is a porphyria it is a Cortaderia that is a porphyria. fact15: That something is both a Benin and not a combustible is incorrect if this thing is not a talks. ; $hypothesis$ = There exists something such that if this is a porphyria then this is not a Cortaderia and this is a porphyria. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that that anticonvulsant is a kind of a porphyria.; fact7 & assump1 -> int1: That anticonvulsant is not a Cortaderia but it is a porphyria.; [assump1] & int1 -> int2: If that anticonvulsant is a porphyria then that anticonvulsant is not a Cortaderia but a porphyria.; int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

This latest does not happens.

¬{D}

fact1: If the fact that this substantiation happens and this patterning does not happens is correct then this latest does not happens. fact2: That that mashing Pachycephala does not happens causes that this substantiation happens and that tailoring occurs. fact3: That this substantiation happens leads to that this substantiation but notthis patterning happens. fact4: This substantiation occurs and that mashing Pachycephala happens.

fact1: ({A} & ¬{C}) -> ¬{D} fact2: ¬{B} -> ({A} & {BK}) fact3: {A} -> ({A} & ¬{C}) fact4: ({A} & {B})

That tailoring occurs.

{BK}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If the fact that this substantiation happens and this patterning does not happens is correct then this latest does not happens. fact2: That that mashing Pachycephala does not happens causes that this substantiation happens and that tailoring occurs. fact3: That this substantiation happens leads to that this substantiation but notthis patterning happens. fact4: This substantiation occurs and that mashing Pachycephala happens. ; $hypothesis$ = This latest does not happens. ; $proof$ =

fact4 -> int1: This substantiation occurs.; int1 & fact3 -> int2: This substantiation but notthis patterning happens.; int2 & fact1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

The fact that this highland does overreach Glareola or that thing is a hoard or both is incorrect.

¬({B}{a} v {C}{a})

fact1: There is something such that it is not asymptotic. fact2: If some man is a hoard the fact that Brennan does not overreach Glareola and/or this person is not a kind of a hypercalcemia does not hold. fact3: This highland is not a kind of a Ptychozoon. fact4: If this julep is not a hypercalcemia that this highland either does overreach Glareola or is a hoard or both is incorrect. fact5: This highland is archegoniate if this highland is not biogeographical. fact6: If that this julep is monecious is correct then that it is a Sapir and not Pretorian does not hold. fact7: That this gynecologist is not a hypercalcemia hold. fact8: If this julep is a Chickamauga it is monecious. fact9: That enophile is Pretorian or is a hypercalcemia or both. fact10: Some man is noncivilised if the fact that either he does not overreach Glareola or he is not a hypercalcemia or both is incorrect. fact11: The fact that this highland overreaches Glareola is true if she is not a hypercalcemia. fact12: This highland is a retrospective if this highland is not a hypercalcemia. fact13: Some person is not a hypercalcemia if it is a kind of a condolence. fact14: Some person is a hoard if the one is a condolence. fact15: If this highland is not a Buchanan then this highland is a hypercalcemia. fact16: If this freeloader is not a hypercalcemia it is a Centaur. fact17: This highland is not a hypercalcemia. fact18: If that something is a Sapir but it is not Pretorian is wrong it is not a Aesir. fact19: If some man is not a kind of a Aesir it is a kind of a condolence and it is not asymptotic.

fact1: (Ex): ¬{E}x fact2: (x): {C}x -> ¬(¬{B}{cp} v ¬{A}{cp}) fact3: ¬{AR}{a} fact4: ¬{A}{b} -> ¬({B}{a} v {C}{a}) fact5: ¬{FF}{a} -> {DJ}{a} fact6: {I}{b} -> ¬({H}{b} & ¬{G}{b}) fact7: ¬{A}{dk} fact8: {J}{b} -> {I}{b} fact9: ({G}{n} v {A}{n}) fact10: (x): ¬(¬{B}x v ¬{A}x) -> {EO}x fact11: ¬{A}{a} -> {B}{a} fact12: ¬{A}{a} -> {GB}{a} fact13: (x): {D}x -> ¬{A}x fact14: (x): {D}x -> {C}x fact15: ¬{BA}{a} -> {A}{a} fact16: ¬{A}{fl} -> {FH}{fl} fact17: ¬{A}{a} fact18: (x): ¬({H}x & ¬{G}x) -> ¬{F}x fact19: (x): ¬{F}x -> ({D}x & ¬{E}x)

The fact that this highland does overreach Glareola or that thing is a hoard or both is incorrect.

¬({B}{a} v {C}{a})

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: There is something such that it is not asymptotic. fact2: If some man is a hoard the fact that Brennan does not overreach Glareola and/or this person is not a kind of a hypercalcemia does not hold. fact3: This highland is not a kind of a Ptychozoon. fact4: If this julep is not a hypercalcemia that this highland either does overreach Glareola or is a hoard or both is incorrect. fact5: This highland is archegoniate if this highland is not biogeographical. fact6: If that this julep is monecious is correct then that it is a Sapir and not Pretorian does not hold. fact7: That this gynecologist is not a hypercalcemia hold. fact8: If this julep is a Chickamauga it is monecious. fact9: That enophile is Pretorian or is a hypercalcemia or both. fact10: Some man is noncivilised if the fact that either he does not overreach Glareola or he is not a hypercalcemia or both is incorrect. fact11: The fact that this highland overreaches Glareola is true if she is not a hypercalcemia. fact12: This highland is a retrospective if this highland is not a hypercalcemia. fact13: Some person is not a hypercalcemia if it is a kind of a condolence. fact14: Some person is a hoard if the one is a condolence. fact15: If this highland is not a Buchanan then this highland is a hypercalcemia. fact16: If this freeloader is not a hypercalcemia it is a Centaur. fact17: This highland is not a hypercalcemia. fact18: If that something is a Sapir but it is not Pretorian is wrong it is not a Aesir. fact19: If some man is not a kind of a Aesir it is a kind of a condolence and it is not asymptotic. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that this highland does overreach Glareola or that thing is a hoard or both is incorrect. ; $proof$ =

fact11 & fact17 -> int1: That this highland overreaches Glareola is right.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That there is something such that if that is not bladed then that does not proceed Rocroi is incorrect.

¬((Ex): ¬{B}x -> ¬{C}x)

fact1: Some person that is not a screwing is not a Kartikeya.

fact1: (x): ¬{BQ}x -> ¬{IL}x

There is something such that if it is not a screwing it is not a Kartikeya.

(Ex): ¬{BQ}x -> ¬{IL}x

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

$facts$ = fact1: Some person that is not a screwing is not a Kartikeya. ; $hypothesis$ = That there is something such that if that is not bladed then that does not proceed Rocroi is incorrect. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That digitalization happens.

{C}

fact1: The stippling Hangzhou occurs. fact2: Notthe icebreaker but this experimentalness happens. fact3: That this colourcast does not occurs but this hopscotch happens prevents that this sexploitation does not happens. fact4: That daubing occurs. fact5: This agonadalness and this anorthicness happens if that thermosettingness does not occurs. fact6: That this unteaching pellucidity does not happens and that thermosettingness does not happens is caused by that this remaindering millilitre does not occurs. fact7: This colourcast does not happens but this hopscotch happens if the khamsin does not occurs. fact8: That variegating occurs if notthe icebreaker but this experimentalness happens. fact9: That this non-agonadalness and/or this non-anorthicness occurs does not hold. fact10: That this sexploitation occurs yields that this remaindering millilitre does not happens but this freshness occurs. fact11: The fact that either that booking Halaka does not occurs or that weeping virility does not happens or both is wrong. fact12: This experimentalness occurs. fact13: That that digitalization and this concreteness occurs is caused by that that variegating does not occurs. fact14: If the fact that the stoicness does not happens or this familiarity does not occurs or both is incorrect then that adjudicatoriness happens. fact15: This action happens. fact16: That the apiculturalness does not happens but this microelectronicness happens prevents that that thermosettingness does not occurs. fact17: That the thirsting Tutankhamen and the nutting Abyla happens results in that that junking attribute does not occurs. fact18: That this sexploitation does not happens is triggered by that this colourcast happens and the unfilledness occurs. fact19: This concreteness occurs if that this agonadalness does not happens or this anorthicness happens or both does not hold. fact20: If that either this agonadalness does not occurs or this anorthicness does not occurs or both is not true this concreteness happens. fact21: This anorthicness occurs. fact22: Both that lingual and the spading Recent occurs. fact23: That this concreteness occurs and that variegating happens prevents that that digitalization happens.

fact1: {IS} fact2: (¬{AA} & {AB}) fact3: (¬{K} & {L}) -> {J} fact4: {IE} fact5: ¬{F} -> ({D} & {E}) fact6: ¬{H} -> (¬{G} & ¬{F}) fact7: ¬{M} -> (¬{K} & {L}) fact8: (¬{AA} & {AB}) -> {B} fact9: ¬(¬{D} v ¬{E}) fact10: {J} -> (¬{H} & {I}) fact11: ¬(¬{BH} v ¬{HG}) fact12: {AB} fact13: ¬{B} -> ({C} & {A}) fact14: ¬(¬{AF} v ¬{IT}) -> {IG} fact15: {AG} fact16: (¬{DU} & {EN}) -> {F} fact17: ({HS} & {GR}) -> ¬{GU} fact18: ({K} & {CM}) -> ¬{J} fact19: ¬(¬{D} v {E}) -> {A} fact20: ¬(¬{D} v ¬{E}) -> {A} fact21: {E} fact22: ({BS} & {EO}) fact23: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C}

That digitalization happens.

{C}

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The stippling Hangzhou occurs. fact2: Notthe icebreaker but this experimentalness happens. fact3: That this colourcast does not occurs but this hopscotch happens prevents that this sexploitation does not happens. fact4: That daubing occurs. fact5: This agonadalness and this anorthicness happens if that thermosettingness does not occurs. fact6: That this unteaching pellucidity does not happens and that thermosettingness does not happens is caused by that this remaindering millilitre does not occurs. fact7: This colourcast does not happens but this hopscotch happens if the khamsin does not occurs. fact8: That variegating occurs if notthe icebreaker but this experimentalness happens. fact9: That this non-agonadalness and/or this non-anorthicness occurs does not hold. fact10: That this sexploitation occurs yields that this remaindering millilitre does not happens but this freshness occurs. fact11: The fact that either that booking Halaka does not occurs or that weeping virility does not happens or both is wrong. fact12: This experimentalness occurs. fact13: That that digitalization and this concreteness occurs is caused by that that variegating does not occurs. fact14: If the fact that the stoicness does not happens or this familiarity does not occurs or both is incorrect then that adjudicatoriness happens. fact15: This action happens. fact16: That the apiculturalness does not happens but this microelectronicness happens prevents that that thermosettingness does not occurs. fact17: That the thirsting Tutankhamen and the nutting Abyla happens results in that that junking attribute does not occurs. fact18: That this sexploitation does not happens is triggered by that this colourcast happens and the unfilledness occurs. fact19: This concreteness occurs if that this agonadalness does not happens or this anorthicness happens or both does not hold. fact20: If that either this agonadalness does not occurs or this anorthicness does not occurs or both is not true this concreteness happens. fact21: This anorthicness occurs. fact22: Both that lingual and the spading Recent occurs. fact23: That this concreteness occurs and that variegating happens prevents that that digitalization happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That digitalization happens. ; $proof$ =

fact8 & fact2 -> int1: That variegating happens.; fact20 & fact9 -> int2: This concreteness occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This concreteness and that variegating occurs.; int3 & fact23 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That everything is a kind of a Cockcroft does not hold.

¬((x): {A}x)

fact1: Every person is a pyrexia. fact2: Every person disincarnates. fact3: Everything crosses Schonbein. fact4: Every man agglomerates Felis. fact5: Everything festers Pollachius. fact6: Every man poaches. fact7: Everyone is a Cockcroft. fact8: Everything presumes gummed. fact9: Someone is not haematological if he/she is not Stravinskyan. fact10: Everything is a toy.

fact1: (x): {BC}x fact2: (x): {FP}x fact3: (x): {FR}x fact4: (x): {JG}x fact5: (x): {IS}x fact6: (x): {AR}x fact7: (x): {A}x fact8: (x): {CQ}x fact9: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬{B}x fact10: (x): {DJ}x

Everything professes.

(x): {EE}x

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Every person is a pyrexia. fact2: Every person disincarnates. fact3: Everything crosses Schonbein. fact4: Every man agglomerates Felis. fact5: Everything festers Pollachius. fact6: Every man poaches. fact7: Everyone is a Cockcroft. fact8: Everything presumes gummed. fact9: Someone is not haematological if he/she is not Stravinskyan. fact10: Everything is a toy. ; $hypothesis$ = That everything is a kind of a Cockcroft does not hold. ; $proof$ =

fact7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This calving Blastomyces does not occurs.

¬{B}

fact1: If the fact that both that disregarding and this slimming lack occurs does not hold that disregarding does not happens. fact2: That this calving Blastomyces does not occurs and this colloidalness happens is wrong if that disregarding does not happens. fact3: If that capture happens then either that unlocking occurs or this prefixation does not occurs or both. fact4: The fact that that disregarding occurs and this slimming lack occurs does not hold if this postponement does not happens. fact5: Either this concatenation happens or that optimization happens or both if that capture does not happens. fact6: If that capture happens then this calving Blastomyces occurs. fact7: Either this concatenation happens or that optimization does not happens or both if that capture does not happens. fact8: If that optimization does not occurs this calving Blastomyces does not happens. fact9: This calving Blastomyces is prevented by this concatenation and/or that that optimization does not occurs.

fact1: ¬({D} & {E}) -> ¬{D} fact2: ¬{D} -> ¬(¬{B} & {C}) fact3: {A} -> ({DL} v ¬{CG}) fact4: ¬{F} -> ¬({D} & {E}) fact5: ¬{A} -> ({AA} v {AB}) fact6: {A} -> {B} fact7: ¬{A} -> ({AA} v ¬{AB}) fact8: ¬{AB} -> ¬{B} fact9: ({AA} v ¬{AB}) -> ¬{B}

This calving Blastomyces occurs.

{B}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If the fact that both that disregarding and this slimming lack occurs does not hold that disregarding does not happens. fact2: That this calving Blastomyces does not occurs and this colloidalness happens is wrong if that disregarding does not happens. fact3: If that capture happens then either that unlocking occurs or this prefixation does not occurs or both. fact4: The fact that that disregarding occurs and this slimming lack occurs does not hold if this postponement does not happens. fact5: Either this concatenation happens or that optimization happens or both if that capture does not happens. fact6: If that capture happens then this calving Blastomyces occurs. fact7: Either this concatenation happens or that optimization does not happens or both if that capture does not happens. fact8: If that optimization does not occurs this calving Blastomyces does not happens. fact9: This calving Blastomyces is prevented by this concatenation and/or that that optimization does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = This calving Blastomyces does not occurs. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That ableness happens and that hammering Mandaeanism occurs.

({B} & {C})

fact1: Either the association happens or the winging happens or both. fact2: The hieroglyphicalness happens. fact3: That hammering Mandaeanism occurs if this rewriting Cartagena occurs. fact4: This matching Domitian occurs if the fact that the encumbering Mahayanism happens is true. fact5: The indiscreetness happens. fact6: If that Sadduceanness occurs that hammering Mandaeanism happens. fact7: That that both that ableness and that hammering Mandaeanism happens is right is incorrect if this econometricness does not occurs. fact8: That both this piloting and the sermonizing happens hold. fact9: That if this econometricness happens that ableness occurs is correct. fact10: The giveaway occurs. fact11: The fact that the quake happens hold. fact12: That this discouraging Interlaken does not happens causes that both this rewriting Cartagena and this non-Sadduceanness happens. fact13: Either this rewriting Cartagena occurs or that Sadduceanness happens or both. fact14: This pinealness occurs. fact15: The fact that that secernating Cercopithecidae but notthat hammering Mandaeanism occurs if that Sadduceanness does not occurs hold. fact16: The fact that this econometricness occurs hold. fact17: The megalithicness happens. fact18: Both this sanctifying and the apogameticness happens.

fact1: ({IQ} v {CD}) fact2: {IE} fact3: {D} -> {C} fact4: {GD} -> {DP} fact5: {CP} fact6: {E} -> {C} fact7: ¬{A} -> ¬({B} & {C}) fact8: ({BE} & {AD}) fact9: {A} -> {B} fact10: {GG} fact11: {CE} fact12: ¬{F} -> ({D} & ¬{E}) fact13: ({D} v {E}) fact14: {EK} fact15: ¬{E} -> ({IA} & ¬{C}) fact16: {A} fact17: {EC} fact18: ({EQ} & {GT})

That exercising occurs and that secernating Cercopithecidae occurs.

({CF} & {IA})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Either the association happens or the winging happens or both. fact2: The hieroglyphicalness happens. fact3: That hammering Mandaeanism occurs if this rewriting Cartagena occurs. fact4: This matching Domitian occurs if the fact that the encumbering Mahayanism happens is true. fact5: The indiscreetness happens. fact6: If that Sadduceanness occurs that hammering Mandaeanism happens. fact7: That that both that ableness and that hammering Mandaeanism happens is right is incorrect if this econometricness does not occurs. fact8: That both this piloting and the sermonizing happens hold. fact9: That if this econometricness happens that ableness occurs is correct. fact10: The giveaway occurs. fact11: The fact that the quake happens hold. fact12: That this discouraging Interlaken does not happens causes that both this rewriting Cartagena and this non-Sadduceanness happens. fact13: Either this rewriting Cartagena occurs or that Sadduceanness happens or both. fact14: This pinealness occurs. fact15: The fact that that secernating Cercopithecidae but notthat hammering Mandaeanism occurs if that Sadduceanness does not occurs hold. fact16: The fact that this econometricness occurs hold. fact17: The megalithicness happens. fact18: Both this sanctifying and the apogameticness happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That ableness happens and that hammering Mandaeanism occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact9 & fact16 -> int1: That ableness occurs.; fact3 & fact13 & fact6 -> int2: That hammering Mandaeanism occurs.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That whistling Manilkara happens.

{C}

fact1: If the pedagogicness occurs then the fact that this pigmenting Vidar does not happens and the gynaeolatry does not occurs hold. fact2: That whistling Manilkara happens and that bioremediation happens if this jump does not happens. fact3: Both this laxation and this heaviness occurs if that travailing gravidity does not happens. fact4: If this pigmenting Vidar does not occurs and the gynaeolatry does not happens this jump does not occurs. fact5: That the mesonicness does not occurs results in that this imperiousness happens and that travailing gravidity does not occurs. fact6: If that walkaway does not happens then both the pedagogicness and this imprisoning Micromyx occurs. fact7: That this revitalisation does not happens and this pinning Xenophanes does not happens prevents that the mesonicness occurs. fact8: If this wheeling Cynoscion does not happens and this disassembly does not occurs that walkaway does not occurs. fact9: That this wheeling Cynoscion does not occurs and this disassembly does not occurs is caused by that that supplying does not occurs. fact10: This jump occurs. fact11: Notthat supplying but the enema occurs if this laxation happens. fact12: That bioremediation occurs.

fact1: {F} -> (¬{E} & ¬{D}) fact2: ¬{B} -> ({C} & {A}) fact3: ¬{O} -> ({M} & {N}) fact4: (¬{E} & ¬{D}) -> ¬{B} fact5: ¬{Q} -> ({P} & ¬{O}) fact6: ¬{H} -> ({F} & {G}) fact7: (¬{R} & ¬{S}) -> ¬{Q} fact8: (¬{I} & ¬{J}) -> ¬{H} fact9: ¬{K} -> (¬{I} & ¬{J}) fact10: {B} fact11: {M} -> (¬{K} & {L}) fact12: {A}

That whistling Manilkara happens.

{C}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If the pedagogicness occurs then the fact that this pigmenting Vidar does not happens and the gynaeolatry does not occurs hold. fact2: That whistling Manilkara happens and that bioremediation happens if this jump does not happens. fact3: Both this laxation and this heaviness occurs if that travailing gravidity does not happens. fact4: If this pigmenting Vidar does not occurs and the gynaeolatry does not happens this jump does not occurs. fact5: That the mesonicness does not occurs results in that this imperiousness happens and that travailing gravidity does not occurs. fact6: If that walkaway does not happens then both the pedagogicness and this imprisoning Micromyx occurs. fact7: That this revitalisation does not happens and this pinning Xenophanes does not happens prevents that the mesonicness occurs. fact8: If this wheeling Cynoscion does not happens and this disassembly does not occurs that walkaway does not occurs. fact9: That this wheeling Cynoscion does not occurs and this disassembly does not occurs is caused by that that supplying does not occurs. fact10: This jump occurs. fact11: Notthat supplying but the enema occurs if this laxation happens. fact12: That bioremediation occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That whistling Manilkara happens. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That balas is not a Bremerhaven but this thing decrepitates crepuscle.

(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a})

fact1: If that that balas is not a Bremerhaven and decrepitates crepuscle is wrong then the thing does not demoralize. fact2: That that polenta is extroversive hold if the norethindrone does anticipate DM. fact3: That that balas demoralizes and does hydrolyze svoboda is right. fact4: If that polenta is not Mohammedan that polenta is a fatigability and is aggressive. fact5: If something hydrolyzes svoboda the fact that it is a kind of a Bismarck is true. fact6: That balas is not a Bremerhaven but it is laniary. fact7: That balas hydrolyzes svoboda. fact8: That the norethindrone anticipates DM is right. fact9: This neuroglia is not a unscrupulousness if that that lobworm is not extroversive is not incorrect. fact10: If the fact that this neuroglia is a kind of a malapropism and does not hydrolyze svoboda hold that balas hydrolyze svoboda. fact11: Something that is not a unscrupulousness demoralizes and is a fouled. fact12: If that balas is a Bremerhaven then that balas does not demoralize. fact13: That balas does not dissertate seriph if that it does not remunerate Albugo and is Mohammedan is incorrect. fact14: If something does demoralize that the fact that either it does not hydrolyze svoboda or it is not a kind of a malapropism or both is not wrong is false. fact15: The fact that that polenta is not Mohammedan hold. fact16: If something does not hydrolyze svoboda then the fact that that is not a Bremerhaven and that does decrepitate crepuscle is false. fact17: That balas is not a Bremerhaven. fact18: The indweller decrepitates crepuscle. fact19: That balas is not bacteremic if that that balas is a kind of non-spicate person that decrepitates crepuscle is wrong. fact20: If that lobworm is not a fouled then that balas demoralizes and it is a kind of a adience. fact21: That balas does not hydrolyze svoboda if the fact that this neuroglia does not hydrolyze svoboda and/or is not a kind of a malapropism is false.

fact1: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact2: {J}{e} -> {F}{d} fact3: ({B}{a} & {A}{a}) fact4: ¬{I}{d} -> ({G}{d} & {H}{d}) fact5: (x): {A}x -> {EC}x fact6: (¬{AA}{a} & {DJ}{a}) fact7: {A}{a} fact8: {J}{e} fact9: ¬{F}{c} -> ¬{E}{b} fact10: ({C}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) -> {A}{a} fact11: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({B}x & {D}x) fact12: {AA}{a} -> ¬{B}{a} fact13: ¬(¬{DH}{a} & {I}{a}) -> ¬{AL}{a} fact14: (x): {B}x -> ¬(¬{A}x v ¬{C}x) fact15: ¬{I}{d} fact16: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) fact17: ¬{AA}{a} fact18: {AB}{ef} fact19: ¬(¬{EJ}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{BM}{a} fact20: ¬{D}{c} -> ({B}{a} & {GE}{a}) fact21: ¬(¬{A}{b} v ¬{C}{b}) -> ¬{A}{a}

That balas is a adience and a Bismarck.

({GE}{a} & {EC}{a})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that that balas is not a Bremerhaven and decrepitates crepuscle is wrong then the thing does not demoralize. fact2: That that polenta is extroversive hold if the norethindrone does anticipate DM. fact3: That that balas demoralizes and does hydrolyze svoboda is right. fact4: If that polenta is not Mohammedan that polenta is a fatigability and is aggressive. fact5: If something hydrolyzes svoboda the fact that it is a kind of a Bismarck is true. fact6: That balas is not a Bremerhaven but it is laniary. fact7: That balas hydrolyzes svoboda. fact8: That the norethindrone anticipates DM is right. fact9: This neuroglia is not a unscrupulousness if that that lobworm is not extroversive is not incorrect. fact10: If the fact that this neuroglia is a kind of a malapropism and does not hydrolyze svoboda hold that balas hydrolyze svoboda. fact11: Something that is not a unscrupulousness demoralizes and is a fouled. fact12: If that balas is a Bremerhaven then that balas does not demoralize. fact13: That balas does not dissertate seriph if that it does not remunerate Albugo and is Mohammedan is incorrect. fact14: If something does demoralize that the fact that either it does not hydrolyze svoboda or it is not a kind of a malapropism or both is not wrong is false. fact15: The fact that that polenta is not Mohammedan hold. fact16: If something does not hydrolyze svoboda then the fact that that is not a Bremerhaven and that does decrepitate crepuscle is false. fact17: That balas is not a Bremerhaven. fact18: The indweller decrepitates crepuscle. fact19: That balas is not bacteremic if that that balas is a kind of non-spicate person that decrepitates crepuscle is wrong. fact20: If that lobworm is not a fouled then that balas demoralizes and it is a kind of a adience. fact21: That balas does not hydrolyze svoboda if the fact that this neuroglia does not hydrolyze svoboda and/or is not a kind of a malapropism is false. ; $hypothesis$ = That balas is not a Bremerhaven but this thing decrepitates crepuscle. ; $proof$ =

void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that that balas is not a Bremerhaven and decrepitates crepuscle is wrong.; fact1 & assump1 -> int1: That balas does not demoralize.; fact3 -> int2: That balas demoralizes.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That executing Nypa occurs.

{C}

fact1: If that this confining Myxobacterales does not occurs hold then this ringing happens and this revolutionary does not occurs. fact2: Both that Snake and the flooding occurs if this mechanisation does not occurs. fact3: This piousness happens. fact4: That horseshow happens and this massage happens. fact5: The skydiving happens. fact6: This revolutionary happens if the fact that this confining Myxobacterales occurs but this ringing does not happens is wrong. fact7: The avuncularness happens. fact8: If that blastocoelicness happens that this mechanisation does not happens is right. fact9: That that executing Nypa does not occurs hold if this massage does not happens and/or that executing Nypa does not occurs. fact10: That that executing Nypa occurs is triggered by that horseshow. fact11: That that horseshow happens is prevented by this wireless. fact12: The fact that this confining Myxobacterales but notthis ringing occurs is incorrect if that Snake occurs. fact13: If this revolutionary happens this wireless happens. fact14: That this massage does not happens is triggered by that that horseshow does not occurs.

fact1: ¬{G} -> ({F} & ¬{E}) fact2: ¬{J} -> ({H} & {I}) fact3: {DH} fact4: ({A} & {B}) fact5: {CO} fact6: ¬({G} & ¬{F}) -> {E} fact7: {FH} fact8: {K} -> ¬{J} fact9: (¬{B} v ¬{C}) -> ¬{C} fact10: {A} -> {C} fact11: {D} -> ¬{A} fact12: {H} -> ¬({G} & ¬{F}) fact13: {E} -> {D} fact14: ¬{A} -> ¬{B}

That executing Nypa does not happens.

¬{C}

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that this confining Myxobacterales does not occurs hold then this ringing happens and this revolutionary does not occurs. fact2: Both that Snake and the flooding occurs if this mechanisation does not occurs. fact3: This piousness happens. fact4: That horseshow happens and this massage happens. fact5: The skydiving happens. fact6: This revolutionary happens if the fact that this confining Myxobacterales occurs but this ringing does not happens is wrong. fact7: The avuncularness happens. fact8: If that blastocoelicness happens that this mechanisation does not happens is right. fact9: That that executing Nypa does not occurs hold if this massage does not happens and/or that executing Nypa does not occurs. fact10: That that executing Nypa occurs is triggered by that horseshow. fact11: That that horseshow happens is prevented by this wireless. fact12: The fact that this confining Myxobacterales but notthis ringing occurs is incorrect if that Snake occurs. fact13: If this revolutionary happens this wireless happens. fact14: That this massage does not happens is triggered by that that horseshow does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = That executing Nypa occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact4 -> int1: That horseshow occurs.; int1 & fact10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That there exists nothing such that this is nonmigratory and does not incrust mujahedeen is false.

¬((x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x))

fact1: Every person drives tranche. fact2: There exists no person such that that one is a jitteriness and that one is not a helplessness. fact3: If some person drives tranche and he is a Flaubert he does not bray cuteness. fact4: There exists nothing such that this is nonmigratory thing that does not incrust mujahedeen. fact5: There exists nobody such that it does stabilise guilder and it is not a kind of a brilliance. fact6: There exists nothing that is nonmigratory and incrusts mujahedeen. fact7: Something is a kind of diaphoretic thing that is bright if it does not bray cuteness. fact8: Everything is a Flaubert.

fact1: (x): {E}x fact2: (x): ¬({GI}x & ¬{FA}x) fact3: (x): ({E}x & {D}x) -> ¬{C}x fact4: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact5: (x): ¬({GF}x & ¬{EN}x) fact6: (x): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) fact7: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({B}x & {A}x) fact8: (x): {D}x

There is nobody that softens ABLS and does not socialize Southey.

(x): ¬({IK}x & ¬{IB}x)

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

DISPROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: Every person drives tranche. fact2: There exists no person such that that one is a jitteriness and that one is not a helplessness. fact3: If some person drives tranche and he is a Flaubert he does not bray cuteness. fact4: There exists nothing such that this is nonmigratory thing that does not incrust mujahedeen. fact5: There exists nobody such that it does stabilise guilder and it is not a kind of a brilliance. fact6: There exists nothing that is nonmigratory and incrusts mujahedeen. fact7: Something is a kind of diaphoretic thing that is bright if it does not bray cuteness. fact8: Everything is a Flaubert. ; $hypothesis$ = That there exists nothing such that this is nonmigratory and does not incrust mujahedeen is false. ; $proof$ =

fact4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

That this axis sensitizes 1 and procrastinates bookishness is incorrect.

¬({A}{a} & {B}{a})

fact1: This axis does belly gramme. fact2: That widgeon is trophotropic person that sensitizes 1. fact3: Something sensitizes 1 and it is unordered if it does not demulsify Rochester. fact4: This axis sensitizes 1. fact5: That raven does not demulsify Rochester. fact6: the 1 sensitizes axis. fact7: The fact that if someone demulsifies Rochester then it is a kind of non-cruciferous one that is unordered is correct. fact8: Something captures if that sensitizes 1. fact9: that bookishness procrastinates axis.

fact1: {CK}{a} fact2: ({AN}{dh} & {A}{dh}) fact3: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({A}x & {D}x) fact4: {A}{a} fact5: ¬{E}{hp} fact6: {AA}{aa} fact7: (x): {E}x -> (¬{C}x & {D}x) fact8: (x): {A}x -> {GR}x fact9: {AB}{ab}

That this axis sensitizes 1 and procrastinates bookishness is incorrect.

¬({A}{a} & {B}{a})

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This axis does belly gramme. fact2: That widgeon is trophotropic person that sensitizes 1. fact3: Something sensitizes 1 and it is unordered if it does not demulsify Rochester. fact4: This axis sensitizes 1. fact5: That raven does not demulsify Rochester. fact6: the 1 sensitizes axis. fact7: The fact that if someone demulsifies Rochester then it is a kind of non-cruciferous one that is unordered is correct. fact8: Something captures if that sensitizes 1. fact9: that bookishness procrastinates axis. ; $hypothesis$ = That this axis sensitizes 1 and procrastinates bookishness is incorrect. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That this thermoreceptor suns Ptloris hold.

{B}{a}

fact1: This thermoreceptor is Saharan and/or it is not a permeableness. fact2: The Englishwoman is not a logotype if the Englishwoman is a permeableness and/or it is not a uncloudedness. fact3: This thermoreceptor does not sun Ptloris if this thermoreceptor is not non-Saharan or that thing is not a permeableness or both.

fact1: ({AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) fact2: ({AB}{fb} v ¬{FF}{fb}) -> ¬{AN}{fb} fact3: ({AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a}

DISPROVED

DISPROVED

$facts$ = fact1: This thermoreceptor is Saharan and/or it is not a permeableness. fact2: The Englishwoman is not a logotype if the Englishwoman is a permeableness and/or it is not a uncloudedness. fact3: This thermoreceptor does not sun Ptloris if this thermoreceptor is not non-Saharan or that thing is not a permeableness or both. ; $hypothesis$ = That this thermoreceptor suns Ptloris hold. ; $proof$ =

fact3 & fact1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__

0.3

This citadel is not a souring.

¬{D}{c}

fact1: The mycelium is opportune and/or she is a Balance. fact2: Something is a souring if it is a snuffling. fact3: If the mycelium is opportune then this citadel is a kind of a snuffling.

fact1: ({A}{a} v {B}{a}) fact2: (x): {C}x -> {D}x fact3: {A}{a} -> {C}{c}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: The mycelium is opportune and/or she is a Balance. fact2: Something is a souring if it is a snuffling. fact3: If the mycelium is opportune then this citadel is a kind of a snuffling. ; $hypothesis$ = This citadel is not a souring. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__

0.3

That dilation and that resuscitating Grappelli occurs.

({A} & {B})

fact1: If that that conglomeration and that disconcerting conniption happens is incorrect then that exhortation does not happens. fact2: This rarefaction does not occurs if the fact that this bebopping checkered and this tomentoseness occurs is false. fact3: The weightlift occurs. fact4: That that resuscitating Grappelli does not occurs and this Latin happens is caused by the non-unappealableness. fact5: That resuscitating Grappelli occurs. fact6: If that budgeting Drimys does not occurs that both that dilation and that resuscitating Grappelli occurs does not hold. fact7: If this rarefaction does not occurs that that conglomeration and that disconcerting conniption happens is false. fact8: That budgeting Drimys does not happens if that engorging happens. fact9: If that recessional occurs then that proprietary does not occurs and this devastating does not happens. fact10: This unappealableness happens and that engorging happens if that proprietary does not occurs. fact11: That recessional occurs and this contorting happens if that exhortation does not happens. fact12: That dilation happens.

fact1: ¬({K} & {L}) -> ¬{J} fact2: ¬({N} & {O}) -> ¬{M} fact3: {CA} fact4: ¬{E} -> (¬{B} & {BN}) fact5: {B} fact6: ¬{C} -> ¬({A} & {B}) fact7: ¬{M} -> ¬({K} & {L}) fact8: {D} -> ¬{C} fact9: {H} -> (¬{F} & ¬{G}) fact10: ¬{F} -> ({E} & {D}) fact11: ¬{J} -> ({H} & {I}) fact12: {A}

This Latin and this typicalness happens.

({BN} & {FE})

PROVED

UNKNOWN

PROVED

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: If that that conglomeration and that disconcerting conniption happens is incorrect then that exhortation does not happens. fact2: This rarefaction does not occurs if the fact that this bebopping checkered and this tomentoseness occurs is false. fact3: The weightlift occurs. fact4: That that resuscitating Grappelli does not occurs and this Latin happens is caused by the non-unappealableness. fact5: That resuscitating Grappelli occurs. fact6: If that budgeting Drimys does not occurs that both that dilation and that resuscitating Grappelli occurs does not hold. fact7: If this rarefaction does not occurs that that conglomeration and that disconcerting conniption happens is false. fact8: That budgeting Drimys does not happens if that engorging happens. fact9: If that recessional occurs then that proprietary does not occurs and this devastating does not happens. fact10: This unappealableness happens and that engorging happens if that proprietary does not occurs. fact11: That recessional occurs and this contorting happens if that exhortation does not happens. fact12: That dilation happens. ; $hypothesis$ = That dilation and that resuscitating Grappelli occurs. ; $proof$ =

fact12 & fact5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__

0.3

That INH is Hebraical.

{D}{b}

fact1: This jalopy does not awe sprechgesang. fact2: That fastnacht is a ordinal if that ratchet scrubs Mauritania. fact3: Either that ratchet scrubs Mauritania or it is shrinkable or both if it does not stoop. fact4: If that ratchet is not denotative then that that ratchet stoops and is not hexangular does not hold. fact5: If that doorhandle is not chelicerous that that borstal is Hebraical thing that is auscultatory is right. fact6: That doorhandle is not chelicerous if this rickrack is not chelicerous. fact7: That fastnacht is a ordinal if that ratchet is shrinkable. fact8: If the fact that that ratchet is denotative but it is not an external is incorrect then that ratchet is denotative. fact9: That that ratchet is a kind of denotative person that is not a kind of an external does not hold if this jalopy does not awe sprechgesang. fact10: That INH is not Hebraical if that borstal frustrates and is Hebraical. fact11: That INH is not auscultatory but it is not incommodious if that borstal is incommodious. fact12: Somebody is commodious if that one is a ordinal. fact13: If someone that is not auscultatory is commodious then that person is Hebraical. fact14: Something does not stoop if that it stoop and is not hexangular is incorrect.

fact1: ¬{M}{g} fact2: {G}{e} -> {F}{c} fact3: ¬{I}{e} -> ({G}{e} v {H}{e}) fact4: ¬{J}{e} -> ¬({I}{e} & ¬{K}{e}) fact5: ¬{E}{d} -> ({D}{a} & {C}{a}) fact6: ¬{E}{f} -> ¬{E}{d} fact7: {H}{e} -> {F}{c} fact8: ¬({J}{e} & ¬{L}{e}) -> ¬{J}{e} fact9: ¬{M}{g} -> ¬({J}{e} & ¬{L}{e}) fact10: ({B}{a} & {D}{a}) -> ¬{D}{b} fact11: {A}{a} -> (¬{C}{b} & {A}{b}) fact12: (x): {F}x -> {A}x fact13: (x): (¬{C}x & {A}x) -> {D}x fact14: (x): ¬({I}x & ¬{K}x) -> ¬{I}x

That INH is not Hebraical.

¬{D}{b}

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

$facts$ = fact1: This jalopy does not awe sprechgesang. fact2: That fastnacht is a ordinal if that ratchet scrubs Mauritania. fact3: Either that ratchet scrubs Mauritania or it is shrinkable or both if it does not stoop. fact4: If that ratchet is not denotative then that that ratchet stoops and is not hexangular does not hold. fact5: If that doorhandle is not chelicerous that that borstal is Hebraical thing that is auscultatory is right. fact6: That doorhandle is not chelicerous if this rickrack is not chelicerous. fact7: That fastnacht is a ordinal if that ratchet is shrinkable. fact8: If the fact that that ratchet is denotative but it is not an external is incorrect then that ratchet is denotative. fact9: That that ratchet is a kind of denotative person that is not a kind of an external does not hold if this jalopy does not awe sprechgesang. fact10: That INH is not Hebraical if that borstal frustrates and is Hebraical. fact11: That INH is not auscultatory but it is not incommodious if that borstal is incommodious. fact12: Somebody is commodious if that one is a ordinal. fact13: If someone that is not auscultatory is commodious then that person is Hebraical. fact14: Something does not stoop if that it stoop and is not hexangular is incorrect. ; $hypothesis$ = That INH is Hebraical. ; $proof$ =

__UNKNOWN__