qid
stringlengths
13
35
query
stringlengths
12
186k
answer_pids
sequencelengths
1
214
dataset
stringclasses
12 values
courtlistener_HTML_Query_640
identifying a finance charge as a fee “imposed as a condition before credit is extended”
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_640" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_641
"The Constitution does not require that a criminal suspect know and understand every possible consequence of a waiver of the Fifth Amendment privilege."
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_641" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_642
noting that the finality rule should only give way in "unusual circumstances"
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_642" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_643
"discrimination by state officials, within the course of their official duties"
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_643" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_644
showing price differences of up to 13% where competitors were absent
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_644" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_645
noting “it defies logic” to limit consideration of defendant’s attempted escape to avoid prosecution solely to his “lesser offenses” when several other serious charges were pending
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_645" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_646
nothing in Brady requires that disclosures be made before trial because, as long as ulti- mate disclosure is made before it is too late for the defen- dant to make use of any benefits of the evidence, due process is satisfied
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_646" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_647
"as to the general doctrine that the law does not allow of fractions of a day, it is settled that, when substantial justice requires it, courts may ascertain the precise time when . . . an act [is] done"
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_647" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_648
holding that a breach of contract cause of action by an employee who was fired from a state college served as an adequate post-deprivation remedy (citations omitted)
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_648" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_649
applying Tatum but expressing disagreement with its rationale
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_649" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_650
“[W]here a decision rests on two or more 4 grounds, none can be relegated to the category of obiter dictum.”
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_650" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_651
stating that, “[i]t has consistently been recognized that pendent jurisdiction is a doctrine of discretion, not of plaintiff’s right.”
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_651" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_652
analyzing a claim under 36 C.F.R. § 261.3(a)
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_652" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_653
collecting cases discussing actionable cause and inactionable motive
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_653" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_654
noting that "[t]he contours of [judicial estoppel] are hazy, and there is no mechanical test for determining its applicability"
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_654" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_655
holding that a restrictive covenant was ancillary to the sale of a business when the purchase of the insurance company and continued employment of the business owner was intended to perpetuate and guarantee future sales
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_655" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_656
“Teague . . . situated the rule it announced in th[e] line of cases adjusting the scope of fed- eral habeas relief in accordance with equitable and pruden- tial considerations”
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_656" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_657
“Expressio unius est exclusio alterius.”
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_657" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_658
holding that § 1983 does not pertain to the “personal pursuits” of government officials
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_658" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_659
relying on the language of the statute to determine legislative intent and construing statutory provisions in a manner consistent with related provisions
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_659" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_660
holding a defendant can be convicted based only on circumstantial evidence and reasonable inferences arising from it, even without any eyewitness identification
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_660" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_661
“In Peterson, this Court held that a service member and his or her family may recover under the state- sponsored terrorism exception to the FSIA only if the service member was a non-combatant not engaged in military hostilities.”
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_661" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_662
requiring error for due process claim
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_662" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_663
“[I]t is unclear whether the [pragmatic finality] doctrine is still viable.”
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_663" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_664
"When opposing parties tell two different stories, one of which is blatantly contradicted by the record, so that no reasonable jury could believe it, a court should not adopt that version of the facts for purposes of ruling on a motion for summary judgment."
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_664" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_665
reviewing age limit for state judges
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_665" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_666
stating, in applying Pickering test, that "only matters of public concern . . . are protected by the First Amendment in this context"
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_666" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_667
Unlike Mr. Shea, “the primary duty of the law enforcement officers [in Reich] . . . involved ‘preventing, investigating, and detecting violations of criminal laws’ . . . and thus they ‘do not administer the affairs of that bureau.”
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_667" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_668
noting that the First Circuit has discussed the state created danger theory but never found it actionable on the facts alleged
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_668" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_669
plaintiff organization suffered injury where challenged practices impaired its ability “to provide counseling and referral services for low- and-moderate-income homeseekers”
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_669" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_670
appellate court will borrow forum state's statute of limitations governing breach 9 of contract claims for ERISA civil collection actions so long as application of state statute's time period would not impede effectuation of federal policy
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_670" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_671
“In DuPont v. Pressman, we held that an employee was entitled to recover damages for wrongful termination based on fictitious grounds, as an application of the good faith and fair dealing exception to the employment-at-will doctrine.”
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_671" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_672
contemporaneously created medical records are generally viewed as more reliable that any current assertions, especially when they are supported by other medical record entries
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_672" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_673
eyewitness’s testimony “extreme- ly important” to State’s case
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_673" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_674
remanding and directing the PCRA court to render “findings of fact and conclusions of law” in support of its disposition of issues turning on credibility
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_674" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_675
“Waiver does not arise from forbearance for a reasonable time, but may be inferred from conduct or acts ‘putting one off his guard and leading him to believe that a right has been waived.’” (quoting Gilman v. Butzloff, 22 So. 2d 263, 265 (Fla. 1945))
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_675" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_676
finding inadequate notice when warning "came not from OSHA but from the general contractor's safety inspector, and was therefore not an authoritative interpretation of the regulation"
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_676" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_677
providing that petitioner bears the burden of showing writ relief is appropriate
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_677" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_678
dismissal of breach of contract claim upheld where plaintiff pled only that he “suffered damages in an amount to be proven at trial”
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_678" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_679
in determining whether a defendant’s absence is voluntary or involuntary, the superior court must consider all the facts presented to it on the issue
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_679" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_680
“[W]e review only issues which are argued specifically and distinctly in a party’s opening brief.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_680" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_681
sentence of bank employee convicted of embezzlement could have been enhanced if evidence showed that the customers whose checks she stole were particularly vulnerable
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_681" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_682
refusing to consider postagreement invalidation of patent because “reasonableness of agreements under the antitrust laws are to be judged at the time the agreements are entered into”
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_682" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_683
noting that inadvertence or mistake may make application of judicial estoppel inappropriate, and referencing "considerations of equity" in deciding that judicial estoppel was appropriate in that case
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_683" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_684
following Foster in identifying 1798 as the key date for an analysis of the right to trial by jury
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_684" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_685
finding a complaint sufficient under Rule E(2)(a
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_685" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_686
decision to decline to pursue an appeal constitutes voluntary action
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_686" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_687
“A predis- posed person is one ‘who takes advantage of an ordinary opportunity to commit criminal acts—not an extraordinary opportunity, the sort of thing that might entice an otherwise law-abiding person … .’” (quoting United States v. Evans, 924 F.2d 714, 717 (7th Cir. 1991
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_687" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_688
"It is a principle of statutory construction that the rules of common law are not to be changed by doubtful implication."
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_688" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_689
explaining that adherence to rigid rules ―has been the character of our jurisprudence in this field‖
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_689" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_690
FAA advisory circular is reviewable "order" under section 46110(a) but also "fall[s] into the vast category of `informal adjudications' in which agencies routinely engage" and thus is not subject to APA requirements of notice and comment and record proceeding
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_690" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_691
suggesting, in dicta, limitation on holding from Worcester
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_691" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_692
determining nothing cruel and unusual about punishing person committing two crimes more severely than person com- mitting only one crime, which is effect of consecutive sentenc- ing
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_692" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_693
holding similarly in the FCA context
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_693" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_694
“It is well-settled that courts are to construe ambiguities against the drafter of a contract . . . .”
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_694" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_695
holding that for the Court of Appeals to draw inferences from known facts was an "inappropriate" exercise in factfinding
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_695" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_696
noting the standard for determining ineffective assistance of counsel applied in federal cases is also applied in Tennessee
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_696" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_697
“For sentences imposed prior to July 1, 2013, a motion under this rule may be filed on or before July 1, 2014.”
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_697" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_698
rejecting government’s threshold argument that this Court lacks jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_698" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_699
remanding where “we lack the clairvoyance necessary to confidently infer the reasoning behind the BIA’s conclusion”
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_699" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_700
exhaustion requires “using all steps that the agency holds out, and doing so properly” (quoting Pozo v. McCaughtry, 286 F.3d 1022, 1024 (7th Cir. 2002))
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_700" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_701
defendant’s irrational behavior and difficulties communicating with his lawyer was not substantial evidence of incompetence
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_701" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_702
“Where the officers’ entitlement to qualified immunity depends on the resolution of disputed issues of fact in their favor, and against the non-moving party, 5 summary judgment is not appropriate.”
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_702" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_703
“Clients generally are presumed to be accountable for and bound by their attorneys” conduct.”
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_703" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_704
union defendants do not breach their duty of fair representation by failing to “process a meritless grievance”
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_704" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_705
denying jurisdiction because Iraq, where arbitration took place, “was not a signatory to the New York Convention or (to the best of the Court’s knowledge
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_705" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_706
wearing United States military uniforms as part of theatrical presentation opposing Vietnam War
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_706" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_707
“[I]t is well-settled that issues not included in an appellant’s statement of questions involved and concise statement of errors complained of on appeal are waived.”
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_707" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_708
"We do not mean to suggest that any plaintiff may challenge the constitutionality of a statute on First Amendment grounds by nakedly asserting that his or her speech was chilled by the statute. The self-censorship door to standing does not open for every plaintiff."
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_708" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_709
“When our jurisdiction is based upon diversity, we apply state substantive law and federal procedural law. See Hanna v. Plumer, 380 U.S. 460, 471-74 (1965).”
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_709" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_710
holding that the cumulative effect of a beating, threatening phone calls, and a kidnapping constituted persecution
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_710" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_711
holding pro se inmate’s notice of appeal deemed filed when he gives it to prison officials
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_711" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_712
“[I]t is certain that a find- ing of unconstitutionality would redress the plaintiffs’ injury, as it would . . . end[ ] the practice of verbal prayer in their schools.”
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_712" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_713
acknowledging, however, that ―cases involving attorney-client agreements are of limited utility when analyzing agreements that do not involve assignments to an attorney‖
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_713" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_714
declaring Williams “persuasive, fair to crew and vessel owners alike” because “[c]ompliance with orders from supervisors will promote vessel safety and will aid efficacy of command at sea”
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_714" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_715
stating that a defendant can, “by cross-examination of a witness[,] . . . open the door for the admission on redirect examination of matters tending to support the case, which would not have been admissible on the case in chief”
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_715" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_716
"In response to a summary judgment motion . . . the plaintiff can no longer rest on . . . `mere allegations,' but must `set forth' . . . `specific facts.'" (citations omitted)
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_716" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_717
evaluating an affidavit claiming non-receipt of a notice against the clerk of court’s records of mailing with the recipient’s subsequent conduct
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_717" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_718
"The trial court . . . properly attempted to analyze white-white elections, as well as to evaluate the success of white candidates in black-white elections, to determine whether whites voted as a bloc to defeat blacks' preferred candi- dates."
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_718" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_719
"In this case, there is forensic evidence that the same gun was used in both the barbershop and cab driver shootings. This fact establishes a substantial connection between the two crimes that supports the admission of evidence regarding the cab driver murder." (emphases added)
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_719" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_720
“It is the interested party’s obligation to create an accurate record and provide Commerce with the information requested to ensure an accurate dumping margin.”
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_720" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_721
“[I]n a prosecution for simple assault under [18 U.S.C.] § 113(a)(5
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_721" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_722
per 1 Kennedy first attempted to serve Bell South on April 16 in South Florida, but did not perfect service because Kennedy tried to serve the company in South Florida, and it no longer conducted business there. 3 Case: 12-15869 Date Filed: 10/18/2013 Page: 4 of 6 curiam
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_722" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_723
record created at a Rule 11 colloquy is accorded a presumption of verity; district court may hold defendant to admissions made at the hearing
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_723" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_724
finding that an EIS with only two alternatives studied in detail was sufficient
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_724" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_725
alluding to the famous aphorism of Anatole France
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_725" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_726
holding that the “use of undisclosed information in adjudications should be presumptively unconstitutional”
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_726" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_727
“Alford tells us that strong evidence on the record can show that a plea is voluntary; it does not hold that only strong evidence on the record permits a finding of voluntariness. And it certainly does not imply that the factual-basis requirement of Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(f
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_727" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_728
concluding that the district court did not abuse its 13 discretion by finding a seven-month delay to be unreasonable
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_728" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_729
holding only if an extraordinary reason, such as a question of significant public interest or an emergency, exists will this Court determine a matter in its original jurisdiction
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_729" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_730
reminding that “the Supreme Court has repeatedly held that a state court’s interpretation of state law, including one announced on direct appeal of the challenged conviction, binds a federal court sitting in habeas corpus”
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_730" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_731
"[T]rial judges must make some effort to protect a party [proceeding pro se ] from waiving a right to be heard because of his or her lack of legal knowledge."
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_731" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_732
“The prosecution cannot use the defendant’s exercise of specific fundamental constitutional guarantees against him at trial”
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_732" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_733
explaining that misunderstanding the effect of filing a prior unexhausted federal habeas petition does not warrant equitable tolling
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_733" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_734
examining constitutional adequacy of notice, pre-removal conference, and post-removal hearing in administrative action to remove child from custody of foster parents
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_734" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_735
no reversible error where “prosecutor accused [defendant] of intentionally disguising his handwriting while giving an exemplar”
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_735" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_736
“ to the extent that statutes can be harmonized, they should be, but in case of an irreconcilable inconsistency between them the later and more specific statute usually controls the earlier and more general one”
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_736" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_737
stating that something more than a child's speculation is needed to establish the number of incidents that occurred
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_737" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_738
holding testimony about other "temporally proximate" drug deals could be admitted to counter defendant's version of events
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_738" ]
courtlistener_HTML
courtlistener_HTML_Query_739
elements of bankruptcy concealment are knowing concealment of property of one's bankruptcy estate from the bankruptcy trustee, with specific intent to defraud creditors
[ "courtlistener_HTML_Passage_739" ]
courtlistener_HTML