label
int64
0
1
text
stringlengths
7
1.31k
1
Was she on her knees, taking lessons from you...or was she skilled already?
0
stephen colbert is driving bill o'reilly crazy
1
friend working at milwaukee history museum could probably get you in for free
0
trump tells australia prime minister that he 'hates taking' refugees
0
Invalid argument to assert that mutations can map a road outside of their assigned task in illogical, where would the information to do so come from? Biology works because every individual cell doing what it was created to do along with what the one next to it was, though created to perform another set of instructions creates the molecular change that the combination of the cells together would produce. But there is no additional information there... not int he way you assert.
0
san juan mayor slams feds'聽response to puerto rico: 'get your ass moving'
0
purritos = cats, burritos, the internet. all our favorite things
1
This is not to say that every current dictionary includes such a definition... yet... but a number of major on-line ones demonstrably do, and to my knowledge human civilization has yet to suffer any negative effects. (By the way, the above entries also include the typical "husband and wife" kind of arrangement as well. Funny how words can have more than one meaning, isn't it?)
0
the art of listening
0
Cite the books. As far as I know, the evolution of the peppered moths is used as an example of natural selection. You don't seem to have understood. Again, cite the books. None I ever used ever claimed that it was proof of evolution.
0
And from this we are to infer that Leakey doubts human evolution? There is by now a huge variety of fossil hominids. If Leakey was admitting that it was difficult to be certain which were or were not directly ancestral to modern humans, this is no more than scientific honesty.