hypothesis
stringlengths 11
177
| context
stringlengths 0
2.71k
| hypothesis_formula
stringlengths 3
35
| context_formula
stringlengths 0
865
| proofs
sequence | proof_label
stringclasses 3
values | proofs_formula
sequence | world_assump_label
stringclasses 3
values | original_tree_depth
int64 1
4
| depth
int64 1
3
⌀ | num_formula_distractors
int64 0
22
| num_translation_distractors
int64 0
0
| num_all_distractors
int64 0
22
| negative_hypothesis
stringlengths 15
158
⌀ | negative_hypothesis_formula
stringlengths 3
37
⌀ | negative_original_tree_depth
int64 0
25
⌀ | negative_proofs
sequence | negative_proof_label
stringclasses 2
values | negative_world_assump_label
stringclasses 2
values | prompt_serial
stringlengths 99
2.85k
| proof_serial
stringlengths 11
654
| version
stringclasses 1
value | premise
stringlengths 0
188
| assumptions
sequence | paraphrased_premises
sequence | paraphrased_premise
stringlengths 0
753
| assumption
stringlengths 0
200
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
that the demoniac is not qualitative is not incorrect. | sent1: that the demoniac furls flanker and it is angular is incorrect. sent2: if that something is a kind of a cine-camera but it does not sing sneaking is not right it is not a perijove. sent3: the fact that something does not sing dermatome and it is not qualitative is wrong if it is not objective. sent4: the demoniac is not qualitative if it is angular. sent5: that the demoniac does furl flanker and is not angular is wrong. sent6: the demoniac is not qualitative if the fact that it is a kind of a Tet and is not a female is not right. sent7: if that something does furl flanker but it is not angular does not hold it is not qualitative. sent8: if the fact that something evens but it is not a laugher does not hold then it does not unfasten CABG. sent9: the Testudo is not qualitative. sent10: something does not explicate if the fact that it is a kind of a macrotus and is not indiscernible is not right. sent11: if the fact that the demoniac is angular but it is not a kind of a deanery does not hold then the fact that it is not a hobbyhorse is not false. sent12: if the fact that something unfastens paperwork but it is not a bilges does not hold it is not sudden. sent13: the fact that the demoniac does furl flanker but it is not a megilp is incorrect. sent14: the demoniac is not a kind of a wishbone. sent15: the fact that the lowland is a kind of angular thing that does not sing dermatome does not hold. sent16: the slasher does not furl flanker. sent17: something is not dead if that it is Eritrean and it is not indiscernible is not right. sent18: if something is angular then it is not qualitative. sent19: the demoniac does not sing Y2K if that it is electronics and it is not a hodoscope does not hold. | ¬{B}{aa} | sent1: ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent2: (x): ¬({FU}x & ¬{FQ}x) -> ¬{T}x sent3: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{C}x & ¬{B}x) sent4: {AB}{aa} -> ¬{B}{aa} sent5: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent6: ¬({BP}{aa} & ¬{BI}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent7: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent8: (x): ¬({FK}x & ¬{HE}x) -> ¬{CJ}x sent9: ¬{B}{jf} sent10: (x): ¬({AI}x & ¬{GO}x) -> ¬{BK}x sent11: ¬({AB}{aa} & ¬{EP}{aa}) -> ¬{P}{aa} sent12: (x): ¬({DK}x & ¬{EN}x) -> ¬{JJ}x sent13: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{K}{aa}) sent14: ¬{BF}{aa} sent15: ¬({AB}{bi} & ¬{C}{bi}) sent16: ¬{AA}{am} sent17: (x): ¬({JK}x & ¬{GO}x) -> ¬{EI}x sent18: (x): {AB}x -> ¬{B}x sent19: ¬({IH}{aa} & ¬{G}{aa}) -> ¬{HQ}{aa} | [
"sent7 -> int1: if the fact that the demoniac does furl flanker and is not angular does not hold then the fact that it is not qualitative is not wrong.; int1 & sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent7 -> int1: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa}; int1 & sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 2 | 2 | 17 | 0 | 17 | the demoniac is qualitative. | {B}{aa} | 5 | [
"sent3 -> int2: if the cyanogen is not a kind of an objective the fact that it does not sing dermatome and it is not qualitative is not right.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that the demoniac is not qualitative is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: that the demoniac furls flanker and it is angular is incorrect. sent2: if that something is a kind of a cine-camera but it does not sing sneaking is not right it is not a perijove. sent3: the fact that something does not sing dermatome and it is not qualitative is wrong if it is not objective. sent4: the demoniac is not qualitative if it is angular. sent5: that the demoniac does furl flanker and is not angular is wrong. sent6: the demoniac is not qualitative if the fact that it is a kind of a Tet and is not a female is not right. sent7: if that something does furl flanker but it is not angular does not hold it is not qualitative. sent8: if the fact that something evens but it is not a laugher does not hold then it does not unfasten CABG. sent9: the Testudo is not qualitative. sent10: something does not explicate if the fact that it is a kind of a macrotus and is not indiscernible is not right. sent11: if the fact that the demoniac is angular but it is not a kind of a deanery does not hold then the fact that it is not a hobbyhorse is not false. sent12: if the fact that something unfastens paperwork but it is not a bilges does not hold it is not sudden. sent13: the fact that the demoniac does furl flanker but it is not a megilp is incorrect. sent14: the demoniac is not a kind of a wishbone. sent15: the fact that the lowland is a kind of angular thing that does not sing dermatome does not hold. sent16: the slasher does not furl flanker. sent17: something is not dead if that it is Eritrean and it is not indiscernible is not right. sent18: if something is angular then it is not qualitative. sent19: the demoniac does not sing Y2K if that it is electronics and it is not a hodoscope does not hold. ; $proof$ = | sent7 -> int1: if the fact that the demoniac does furl flanker and is not angular does not hold then the fact that it is not qualitative is not wrong.; int1 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | if that something does furl flanker but it is not angular does not hold it is not qualitative. | [
"that the demoniac does furl flanker and is not angular is wrong."
] | [
"if that something does furl flanker but it is not angular does not hold it is not qualitative."
] | if that something does furl flanker but it is not angular does not hold it is not qualitative. | that the demoniac does furl flanker and is not angular is wrong. |
the middleweight is a prerequisite. | sent1: that that the Ward does not sing Radyera hold if the fact that the fact that the middleweight is non-apocryphal and a prerequisite is not incorrect is wrong is not incorrect. sent2: the fact that something is an albacore and/or not a squall does not hold if it does not sing Radyera. sent3: something is neuropsychiatric thing that does not scythe novel if it is beakless. sent4: something is non-apocryphal thing that does not sing Radyera if it is neuropsychiatric. sent5: if the plum-yew is not beakless the middleweight is neuropsychiatric and it scythes novel. sent6: the anionic is non-neuropsychiatric thing that is non-apocryphal. sent7: if something does not sing Radyera then it is a prerequisite. sent8: something is not an albacore if the fact that it does not sing Radyera hold. sent9: if the anionic is a kind of non-neuropsychiatric thing that is not apocryphal it does not sing Radyera. sent10: the middleweight is not a prerequisite if the fact that the anionic is a kind of an albacore and/or it is not a squall does not hold. sent11: that the plum-yew does not sing Bronte hold if that the novel is autoplastic and/or it does sing Bronte is not right. sent12: that something is transuranic and/or is not basidiomycetous is not true if it does not sing Radyera. sent13: that the middleweight is not apocryphal but it is a prerequisite is not correct if the plum-yew is neuropsychiatric. sent14: something that does not sing Bronte is a kind of beakless thing that does unfasten geometry. sent15: if the novel does not shimmer then that that it either is autoplastic or does sing Bronte or both is true does not hold. | {B}{a} | sent1: ¬(¬{C}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{A}{ij} sent2: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({AA}x v ¬{AB}x) sent3: (x): {F}x -> ({D}x & ¬{E}x) sent4: (x): {D}x -> (¬{C}x & ¬{A}x) sent5: ¬{F}{b} -> ({D}{a} & {E}{a}) sent6: (¬{D}{aa} & ¬{C}{aa}) sent7: (x): ¬{A}x -> {B}x sent8: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬{AA}x sent9: (¬{D}{aa} & ¬{C}{aa}) -> ¬{A}{aa} sent10: ¬({AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{a} sent11: ¬({J}{c} v {H}{c}) -> ¬{H}{b} sent12: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({HA}x v ¬{DN}x) sent13: {D}{b} -> ¬(¬{C}{a} & {B}{a}) sent14: (x): ¬{H}x -> ({F}x & {G}x) sent15: ¬{I}{c} -> ¬({J}{c} v {H}{c}) | [
"sent2 -> int1: if the anionic does not sing Radyera the fact that it is an albacore or it does not squall or both is incorrect.; sent9 & sent6 -> int2: the anionic does not sing Radyera.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the anionic is a kind of an albacore and/or is not a squall is not true.; int3 & sent10 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent2 -> int1: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}); sent9 & sent6 -> int2: ¬{A}{aa}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ¬({AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}); int3 & sent10 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 3 | 3 | 11 | 0 | 11 | the middleweight is a kind of a prerequisite. | {B}{a} | 6 | [
"sent7 -> int4: if the middleweight does not sing Radyera then it is a prerequisite.; sent4 -> int5: the middleweight is not apocryphal and it does not sing Radyera if it is neuropsychiatric.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the middleweight is a prerequisite. ; $context$ = sent1: that that the Ward does not sing Radyera hold if the fact that the fact that the middleweight is non-apocryphal and a prerequisite is not incorrect is wrong is not incorrect. sent2: the fact that something is an albacore and/or not a squall does not hold if it does not sing Radyera. sent3: something is neuropsychiatric thing that does not scythe novel if it is beakless. sent4: something is non-apocryphal thing that does not sing Radyera if it is neuropsychiatric. sent5: if the plum-yew is not beakless the middleweight is neuropsychiatric and it scythes novel. sent6: the anionic is non-neuropsychiatric thing that is non-apocryphal. sent7: if something does not sing Radyera then it is a prerequisite. sent8: something is not an albacore if the fact that it does not sing Radyera hold. sent9: if the anionic is a kind of non-neuropsychiatric thing that is not apocryphal it does not sing Radyera. sent10: the middleweight is not a prerequisite if the fact that the anionic is a kind of an albacore and/or it is not a squall does not hold. sent11: that the plum-yew does not sing Bronte hold if that the novel is autoplastic and/or it does sing Bronte is not right. sent12: that something is transuranic and/or is not basidiomycetous is not true if it does not sing Radyera. sent13: that the middleweight is not apocryphal but it is a prerequisite is not correct if the plum-yew is neuropsychiatric. sent14: something that does not sing Bronte is a kind of beakless thing that does unfasten geometry. sent15: if the novel does not shimmer then that that it either is autoplastic or does sing Bronte or both is true does not hold. ; $proof$ = | sent2 -> int1: if the anionic does not sing Radyera the fact that it is an albacore or it does not squall or both is incorrect.; sent9 & sent6 -> int2: the anionic does not sing Radyera.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the anionic is a kind of an albacore and/or is not a squall is not true.; int3 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the fact that something is an albacore and/or not a squall does not hold if it does not sing Radyera. | [
"if the anionic is a kind of non-neuropsychiatric thing that is not apocryphal it does not sing Radyera.",
"the anionic is non-neuropsychiatric thing that is non-apocryphal.",
"the middleweight is not a prerequisite if the fact that the anionic is a kind of an albacore and/or it is not a squall does not hold."
] | [
"It does not hold if something is an albacore and not a squall.",
"If it doesn't sing radyera, then something is an albacore and not a squall.",
"It doesn't hold if something is an albacore and not a squall."
] | It does not hold if something is an albacore and not a squall. | if the anionic is a kind of non-neuropsychiatric thing that is not apocryphal it does not sing Radyera. |
the middleweight is a prerequisite. | sent1: that that the Ward does not sing Radyera hold if the fact that the fact that the middleweight is non-apocryphal and a prerequisite is not incorrect is wrong is not incorrect. sent2: the fact that something is an albacore and/or not a squall does not hold if it does not sing Radyera. sent3: something is neuropsychiatric thing that does not scythe novel if it is beakless. sent4: something is non-apocryphal thing that does not sing Radyera if it is neuropsychiatric. sent5: if the plum-yew is not beakless the middleweight is neuropsychiatric and it scythes novel. sent6: the anionic is non-neuropsychiatric thing that is non-apocryphal. sent7: if something does not sing Radyera then it is a prerequisite. sent8: something is not an albacore if the fact that it does not sing Radyera hold. sent9: if the anionic is a kind of non-neuropsychiatric thing that is not apocryphal it does not sing Radyera. sent10: the middleweight is not a prerequisite if the fact that the anionic is a kind of an albacore and/or it is not a squall does not hold. sent11: that the plum-yew does not sing Bronte hold if that the novel is autoplastic and/or it does sing Bronte is not right. sent12: that something is transuranic and/or is not basidiomycetous is not true if it does not sing Radyera. sent13: that the middleweight is not apocryphal but it is a prerequisite is not correct if the plum-yew is neuropsychiatric. sent14: something that does not sing Bronte is a kind of beakless thing that does unfasten geometry. sent15: if the novel does not shimmer then that that it either is autoplastic or does sing Bronte or both is true does not hold. | {B}{a} | sent1: ¬(¬{C}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{A}{ij} sent2: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({AA}x v ¬{AB}x) sent3: (x): {F}x -> ({D}x & ¬{E}x) sent4: (x): {D}x -> (¬{C}x & ¬{A}x) sent5: ¬{F}{b} -> ({D}{a} & {E}{a}) sent6: (¬{D}{aa} & ¬{C}{aa}) sent7: (x): ¬{A}x -> {B}x sent8: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬{AA}x sent9: (¬{D}{aa} & ¬{C}{aa}) -> ¬{A}{aa} sent10: ¬({AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{a} sent11: ¬({J}{c} v {H}{c}) -> ¬{H}{b} sent12: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({HA}x v ¬{DN}x) sent13: {D}{b} -> ¬(¬{C}{a} & {B}{a}) sent14: (x): ¬{H}x -> ({F}x & {G}x) sent15: ¬{I}{c} -> ¬({J}{c} v {H}{c}) | [
"sent2 -> int1: if the anionic does not sing Radyera the fact that it is an albacore or it does not squall or both is incorrect.; sent9 & sent6 -> int2: the anionic does not sing Radyera.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the anionic is a kind of an albacore and/or is not a squall is not true.; int3 & sent10 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent2 -> int1: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}); sent9 & sent6 -> int2: ¬{A}{aa}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ¬({AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}); int3 & sent10 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 3 | 3 | 11 | 0 | 11 | the middleweight is a kind of a prerequisite. | {B}{a} | 6 | [
"sent7 -> int4: if the middleweight does not sing Radyera then it is a prerequisite.; sent4 -> int5: the middleweight is not apocryphal and it does not sing Radyera if it is neuropsychiatric.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the middleweight is a prerequisite. ; $context$ = sent1: that that the Ward does not sing Radyera hold if the fact that the fact that the middleweight is non-apocryphal and a prerequisite is not incorrect is wrong is not incorrect. sent2: the fact that something is an albacore and/or not a squall does not hold if it does not sing Radyera. sent3: something is neuropsychiatric thing that does not scythe novel if it is beakless. sent4: something is non-apocryphal thing that does not sing Radyera if it is neuropsychiatric. sent5: if the plum-yew is not beakless the middleweight is neuropsychiatric and it scythes novel. sent6: the anionic is non-neuropsychiatric thing that is non-apocryphal. sent7: if something does not sing Radyera then it is a prerequisite. sent8: something is not an albacore if the fact that it does not sing Radyera hold. sent9: if the anionic is a kind of non-neuropsychiatric thing that is not apocryphal it does not sing Radyera. sent10: the middleweight is not a prerequisite if the fact that the anionic is a kind of an albacore and/or it is not a squall does not hold. sent11: that the plum-yew does not sing Bronte hold if that the novel is autoplastic and/or it does sing Bronte is not right. sent12: that something is transuranic and/or is not basidiomycetous is not true if it does not sing Radyera. sent13: that the middleweight is not apocryphal but it is a prerequisite is not correct if the plum-yew is neuropsychiatric. sent14: something that does not sing Bronte is a kind of beakless thing that does unfasten geometry. sent15: if the novel does not shimmer then that that it either is autoplastic or does sing Bronte or both is true does not hold. ; $proof$ = | sent2 -> int1: if the anionic does not sing Radyera the fact that it is an albacore or it does not squall or both is incorrect.; sent9 & sent6 -> int2: the anionic does not sing Radyera.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the anionic is a kind of an albacore and/or is not a squall is not true.; int3 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the fact that something is an albacore and/or not a squall does not hold if it does not sing Radyera. | [
"if the anionic is a kind of non-neuropsychiatric thing that is not apocryphal it does not sing Radyera.",
"the anionic is non-neuropsychiatric thing that is non-apocryphal.",
"the middleweight is not a prerequisite if the fact that the anionic is a kind of an albacore and/or it is not a squall does not hold."
] | [
"It does not hold if something is an albacore and not a squall.",
"If it doesn't sing radyera, then something is an albacore and not a squall.",
"It doesn't hold if something is an albacore and not a squall."
] | If it doesn't sing radyera, then something is an albacore and not a squall. | the anionic is non-neuropsychiatric thing that is non-apocryphal. |
the middleweight is a prerequisite. | sent1: that that the Ward does not sing Radyera hold if the fact that the fact that the middleweight is non-apocryphal and a prerequisite is not incorrect is wrong is not incorrect. sent2: the fact that something is an albacore and/or not a squall does not hold if it does not sing Radyera. sent3: something is neuropsychiatric thing that does not scythe novel if it is beakless. sent4: something is non-apocryphal thing that does not sing Radyera if it is neuropsychiatric. sent5: if the plum-yew is not beakless the middleweight is neuropsychiatric and it scythes novel. sent6: the anionic is non-neuropsychiatric thing that is non-apocryphal. sent7: if something does not sing Radyera then it is a prerequisite. sent8: something is not an albacore if the fact that it does not sing Radyera hold. sent9: if the anionic is a kind of non-neuropsychiatric thing that is not apocryphal it does not sing Radyera. sent10: the middleweight is not a prerequisite if the fact that the anionic is a kind of an albacore and/or it is not a squall does not hold. sent11: that the plum-yew does not sing Bronte hold if that the novel is autoplastic and/or it does sing Bronte is not right. sent12: that something is transuranic and/or is not basidiomycetous is not true if it does not sing Radyera. sent13: that the middleweight is not apocryphal but it is a prerequisite is not correct if the plum-yew is neuropsychiatric. sent14: something that does not sing Bronte is a kind of beakless thing that does unfasten geometry. sent15: if the novel does not shimmer then that that it either is autoplastic or does sing Bronte or both is true does not hold. | {B}{a} | sent1: ¬(¬{C}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{A}{ij} sent2: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({AA}x v ¬{AB}x) sent3: (x): {F}x -> ({D}x & ¬{E}x) sent4: (x): {D}x -> (¬{C}x & ¬{A}x) sent5: ¬{F}{b} -> ({D}{a} & {E}{a}) sent6: (¬{D}{aa} & ¬{C}{aa}) sent7: (x): ¬{A}x -> {B}x sent8: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬{AA}x sent9: (¬{D}{aa} & ¬{C}{aa}) -> ¬{A}{aa} sent10: ¬({AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{a} sent11: ¬({J}{c} v {H}{c}) -> ¬{H}{b} sent12: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({HA}x v ¬{DN}x) sent13: {D}{b} -> ¬(¬{C}{a} & {B}{a}) sent14: (x): ¬{H}x -> ({F}x & {G}x) sent15: ¬{I}{c} -> ¬({J}{c} v {H}{c}) | [
"sent2 -> int1: if the anionic does not sing Radyera the fact that it is an albacore or it does not squall or both is incorrect.; sent9 & sent6 -> int2: the anionic does not sing Radyera.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the anionic is a kind of an albacore and/or is not a squall is not true.; int3 & sent10 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent2 -> int1: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}); sent9 & sent6 -> int2: ¬{A}{aa}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ¬({AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}); int3 & sent10 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 3 | 3 | 11 | 0 | 11 | the middleweight is a kind of a prerequisite. | {B}{a} | 6 | [
"sent7 -> int4: if the middleweight does not sing Radyera then it is a prerequisite.; sent4 -> int5: the middleweight is not apocryphal and it does not sing Radyera if it is neuropsychiatric.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the middleweight is a prerequisite. ; $context$ = sent1: that that the Ward does not sing Radyera hold if the fact that the fact that the middleweight is non-apocryphal and a prerequisite is not incorrect is wrong is not incorrect. sent2: the fact that something is an albacore and/or not a squall does not hold if it does not sing Radyera. sent3: something is neuropsychiatric thing that does not scythe novel if it is beakless. sent4: something is non-apocryphal thing that does not sing Radyera if it is neuropsychiatric. sent5: if the plum-yew is not beakless the middleweight is neuropsychiatric and it scythes novel. sent6: the anionic is non-neuropsychiatric thing that is non-apocryphal. sent7: if something does not sing Radyera then it is a prerequisite. sent8: something is not an albacore if the fact that it does not sing Radyera hold. sent9: if the anionic is a kind of non-neuropsychiatric thing that is not apocryphal it does not sing Radyera. sent10: the middleweight is not a prerequisite if the fact that the anionic is a kind of an albacore and/or it is not a squall does not hold. sent11: that the plum-yew does not sing Bronte hold if that the novel is autoplastic and/or it does sing Bronte is not right. sent12: that something is transuranic and/or is not basidiomycetous is not true if it does not sing Radyera. sent13: that the middleweight is not apocryphal but it is a prerequisite is not correct if the plum-yew is neuropsychiatric. sent14: something that does not sing Bronte is a kind of beakless thing that does unfasten geometry. sent15: if the novel does not shimmer then that that it either is autoplastic or does sing Bronte or both is true does not hold. ; $proof$ = | sent2 -> int1: if the anionic does not sing Radyera the fact that it is an albacore or it does not squall or both is incorrect.; sent9 & sent6 -> int2: the anionic does not sing Radyera.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the anionic is a kind of an albacore and/or is not a squall is not true.; int3 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the fact that something is an albacore and/or not a squall does not hold if it does not sing Radyera. | [
"if the anionic is a kind of non-neuropsychiatric thing that is not apocryphal it does not sing Radyera.",
"the anionic is non-neuropsychiatric thing that is non-apocryphal.",
"the middleweight is not a prerequisite if the fact that the anionic is a kind of an albacore and/or it is not a squall does not hold."
] | [
"It does not hold if something is an albacore and not a squall.",
"If it doesn't sing radyera, then something is an albacore and not a squall.",
"It doesn't hold if something is an albacore and not a squall."
] | It doesn't hold if something is an albacore and not a squall. | the middleweight is not a prerequisite if the fact that the anionic is a kind of an albacore and/or it is not a squall does not hold. |
that the dog does not furl Caribbean and it is not Beethovenian does not hold. | sent1: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a wingspread then that the dog furls Caribbean and is Beethovenian is false. sent2: the Glycine is not tetragonal if that the immodesty is both not a farness and a doom does not hold. sent3: if something is not a fury and/or is not inboard the fact that it is not inboard is not incorrect. sent4: something is a kind of non-adnate a slot. sent5: that the dog does not furl Caribbean is not false. sent6: if something is both a founder and tetragonal it is not a kind of a wingspread. sent7: if the dog is not a slot then it is non-Beethovenian thing that is not adnate. sent8: something does not furl Caribbean if it is not a wingspread. sent9: if something is not adnate and it does not slot then the dog is not a wingspread. sent10: if the Glycine is a wingspread that the fact that the dog does not furl Caribbean and is not Beethovenian is false is right. sent11: something that is not a wingspread does not furl Caribbean and is not Beethovenian. sent12: something does not slot. sent13: the dog does not furl Caribbean if that it is not a wingspread is not incorrect. sent14: the Glycine is not a fury and not inboard if it is not unpleasant. sent15: something is a kind of a wingspread and it does founder if it is not tetragonal. sent16: if something that is not a kind of a fury is not inboard then it is tetragonal. sent17: the floorwalker is not adnate and it is not a slot. sent18: the floorwalker is not a slot. sent19: there are non-adnate things. sent20: the fact that the Glycine is not a doom but a farness does not hold. sent21: there exists something such that it is adnate and it is not a kind of a slot. sent22: if that something is both not a doom and a farness is wrong it is a kind of a founder. sent23: the Glycine is not unpleasant. | ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) | sent1: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({B}{a} & {C}{a}) sent2: ¬(¬{G}{c} & {F}{c}) -> ¬{E}{b} sent3: (x): (¬{I}x v ¬{H}x) -> ¬{H}x sent4: (Ex): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent5: ¬{B}{a} sent6: (x): ({D}x & {E}x) -> ¬{A}x sent7: ¬{AB}{a} -> (¬{C}{a} & ¬{AA}{a}) sent8: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬{B}x sent9: (x): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{A}{a} sent10: {A}{b} -> ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent11: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{B}x & ¬{C}x) sent12: (Ex): ¬{AB}x sent13: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{B}{a} sent14: ¬{J}{b} -> (¬{I}{b} & ¬{H}{b}) sent15: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({A}x & {D}x) sent16: (x): (¬{I}x & ¬{H}x) -> {E}x sent17: (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent18: ¬{AB}{aa} sent19: (Ex): ¬{AA}x sent20: ¬(¬{F}{b} & {G}{b}) sent21: (Ex): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent22: (x): ¬(¬{F}x & {G}x) -> {D}x sent23: ¬{J}{b} | [
"sent17 -> int1: something is not adnate and it does not slot.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the dog is not a kind of a wingspread.; sent11 -> int3: the dog does not furl Caribbean and is not Beethovenian if it is not a kind of a wingspread.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent17 -> int1: (Ex): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x); int1 & sent9 -> int2: ¬{A}{a}; sent11 -> int3: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}); int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 3 | 3 | 20 | 0 | 20 | the fact that the dog does not furl Caribbean and is not Beethovenian is incorrect. | ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) | 8 | [
"sent15 -> int4: the Glycine is a kind of a wingspread and it is a founder if it is not tetragonal.; sent3 -> int5: the cyanogen is not inboard if it is not a kind of a fury and/or it is not inboard.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that the dog does not furl Caribbean and it is not Beethovenian does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a wingspread then that the dog furls Caribbean and is Beethovenian is false. sent2: the Glycine is not tetragonal if that the immodesty is both not a farness and a doom does not hold. sent3: if something is not a fury and/or is not inboard the fact that it is not inboard is not incorrect. sent4: something is a kind of non-adnate a slot. sent5: that the dog does not furl Caribbean is not false. sent6: if something is both a founder and tetragonal it is not a kind of a wingspread. sent7: if the dog is not a slot then it is non-Beethovenian thing that is not adnate. sent8: something does not furl Caribbean if it is not a wingspread. sent9: if something is not adnate and it does not slot then the dog is not a wingspread. sent10: if the Glycine is a wingspread that the fact that the dog does not furl Caribbean and is not Beethovenian is false is right. sent11: something that is not a wingspread does not furl Caribbean and is not Beethovenian. sent12: something does not slot. sent13: the dog does not furl Caribbean if that it is not a wingspread is not incorrect. sent14: the Glycine is not a fury and not inboard if it is not unpleasant. sent15: something is a kind of a wingspread and it does founder if it is not tetragonal. sent16: if something that is not a kind of a fury is not inboard then it is tetragonal. sent17: the floorwalker is not adnate and it is not a slot. sent18: the floorwalker is not a slot. sent19: there are non-adnate things. sent20: the fact that the Glycine is not a doom but a farness does not hold. sent21: there exists something such that it is adnate and it is not a kind of a slot. sent22: if that something is both not a doom and a farness is wrong it is a kind of a founder. sent23: the Glycine is not unpleasant. ; $proof$ = | sent17 -> int1: something is not adnate and it does not slot.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the dog is not a kind of a wingspread.; sent11 -> int3: the dog does not furl Caribbean and is not Beethovenian if it is not a kind of a wingspread.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the floorwalker is not adnate and it is not a slot. | [
"if something is not adnate and it does not slot then the dog is not a wingspread.",
"something that is not a wingspread does not furl Caribbean and is not Beethovenian."
] | [
"The floorwalker is not a slot.",
"The floorwalker isn't a slot and it isn't adnate."
] | The floorwalker is not a slot. | if something is not adnate and it does not slot then the dog is not a wingspread. |
that the dog does not furl Caribbean and it is not Beethovenian does not hold. | sent1: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a wingspread then that the dog furls Caribbean and is Beethovenian is false. sent2: the Glycine is not tetragonal if that the immodesty is both not a farness and a doom does not hold. sent3: if something is not a fury and/or is not inboard the fact that it is not inboard is not incorrect. sent4: something is a kind of non-adnate a slot. sent5: that the dog does not furl Caribbean is not false. sent6: if something is both a founder and tetragonal it is not a kind of a wingspread. sent7: if the dog is not a slot then it is non-Beethovenian thing that is not adnate. sent8: something does not furl Caribbean if it is not a wingspread. sent9: if something is not adnate and it does not slot then the dog is not a wingspread. sent10: if the Glycine is a wingspread that the fact that the dog does not furl Caribbean and is not Beethovenian is false is right. sent11: something that is not a wingspread does not furl Caribbean and is not Beethovenian. sent12: something does not slot. sent13: the dog does not furl Caribbean if that it is not a wingspread is not incorrect. sent14: the Glycine is not a fury and not inboard if it is not unpleasant. sent15: something is a kind of a wingspread and it does founder if it is not tetragonal. sent16: if something that is not a kind of a fury is not inboard then it is tetragonal. sent17: the floorwalker is not adnate and it is not a slot. sent18: the floorwalker is not a slot. sent19: there are non-adnate things. sent20: the fact that the Glycine is not a doom but a farness does not hold. sent21: there exists something such that it is adnate and it is not a kind of a slot. sent22: if that something is both not a doom and a farness is wrong it is a kind of a founder. sent23: the Glycine is not unpleasant. | ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) | sent1: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({B}{a} & {C}{a}) sent2: ¬(¬{G}{c} & {F}{c}) -> ¬{E}{b} sent3: (x): (¬{I}x v ¬{H}x) -> ¬{H}x sent4: (Ex): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent5: ¬{B}{a} sent6: (x): ({D}x & {E}x) -> ¬{A}x sent7: ¬{AB}{a} -> (¬{C}{a} & ¬{AA}{a}) sent8: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬{B}x sent9: (x): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{A}{a} sent10: {A}{b} -> ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent11: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{B}x & ¬{C}x) sent12: (Ex): ¬{AB}x sent13: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{B}{a} sent14: ¬{J}{b} -> (¬{I}{b} & ¬{H}{b}) sent15: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({A}x & {D}x) sent16: (x): (¬{I}x & ¬{H}x) -> {E}x sent17: (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent18: ¬{AB}{aa} sent19: (Ex): ¬{AA}x sent20: ¬(¬{F}{b} & {G}{b}) sent21: (Ex): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent22: (x): ¬(¬{F}x & {G}x) -> {D}x sent23: ¬{J}{b} | [
"sent17 -> int1: something is not adnate and it does not slot.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the dog is not a kind of a wingspread.; sent11 -> int3: the dog does not furl Caribbean and is not Beethovenian if it is not a kind of a wingspread.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent17 -> int1: (Ex): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x); int1 & sent9 -> int2: ¬{A}{a}; sent11 -> int3: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}); int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 3 | 3 | 20 | 0 | 20 | the fact that the dog does not furl Caribbean and is not Beethovenian is incorrect. | ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) | 8 | [
"sent15 -> int4: the Glycine is a kind of a wingspread and it is a founder if it is not tetragonal.; sent3 -> int5: the cyanogen is not inboard if it is not a kind of a fury and/or it is not inboard.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that the dog does not furl Caribbean and it is not Beethovenian does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a wingspread then that the dog furls Caribbean and is Beethovenian is false. sent2: the Glycine is not tetragonal if that the immodesty is both not a farness and a doom does not hold. sent3: if something is not a fury and/or is not inboard the fact that it is not inboard is not incorrect. sent4: something is a kind of non-adnate a slot. sent5: that the dog does not furl Caribbean is not false. sent6: if something is both a founder and tetragonal it is not a kind of a wingspread. sent7: if the dog is not a slot then it is non-Beethovenian thing that is not adnate. sent8: something does not furl Caribbean if it is not a wingspread. sent9: if something is not adnate and it does not slot then the dog is not a wingspread. sent10: if the Glycine is a wingspread that the fact that the dog does not furl Caribbean and is not Beethovenian is false is right. sent11: something that is not a wingspread does not furl Caribbean and is not Beethovenian. sent12: something does not slot. sent13: the dog does not furl Caribbean if that it is not a wingspread is not incorrect. sent14: the Glycine is not a fury and not inboard if it is not unpleasant. sent15: something is a kind of a wingspread and it does founder if it is not tetragonal. sent16: if something that is not a kind of a fury is not inboard then it is tetragonal. sent17: the floorwalker is not adnate and it is not a slot. sent18: the floorwalker is not a slot. sent19: there are non-adnate things. sent20: the fact that the Glycine is not a doom but a farness does not hold. sent21: there exists something such that it is adnate and it is not a kind of a slot. sent22: if that something is both not a doom and a farness is wrong it is a kind of a founder. sent23: the Glycine is not unpleasant. ; $proof$ = | sent17 -> int1: something is not adnate and it does not slot.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the dog is not a kind of a wingspread.; sent11 -> int3: the dog does not furl Caribbean and is not Beethovenian if it is not a kind of a wingspread.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the floorwalker is not adnate and it is not a slot. | [
"if something is not adnate and it does not slot then the dog is not a wingspread.",
"something that is not a wingspread does not furl Caribbean and is not Beethovenian."
] | [
"The floorwalker is not a slot.",
"The floorwalker isn't a slot and it isn't adnate."
] | The floorwalker isn't a slot and it isn't adnate. | something that is not a wingspread does not furl Caribbean and is not Beethovenian. |
not the shopping but the furling breastplate happens. | sent1: the azonalness does not occur. sent2: if the azonalness does not occur not the shopping but the furling breastplate occurs. sent3: the azonalness is brought about by that the anticoagulation happens. sent4: if the fact that the anticoagulation does not occur and the beats happens does not hold the anticoagulation happens. sent5: that the ambulacralness does not occur hold. sent6: if the azonalness happens that not the shop but the furling breastplate occurs is not true. | (¬{AA} & {AB}) | sent1: ¬{A} sent2: ¬{A} -> (¬{AA} & {AB}) sent3: {B} -> {A} sent4: ¬(¬{B} & {D}) -> {B} sent5: ¬{HQ} sent6: {A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) | [
"sent2 & sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent2 & sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4 | the fact that the shop does not occur but the furling breastplate happens is not true. | ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) | 8 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = not the shopping but the furling breastplate happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the azonalness does not occur. sent2: if the azonalness does not occur not the shopping but the furling breastplate occurs. sent3: the azonalness is brought about by that the anticoagulation happens. sent4: if the fact that the anticoagulation does not occur and the beats happens does not hold the anticoagulation happens. sent5: that the ambulacralness does not occur hold. sent6: if the azonalness happens that not the shop but the furling breastplate occurs is not true. ; $proof$ = | sent2 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | if the azonalness does not occur not the shopping but the furling breastplate occurs. | [
"the azonalness does not occur."
] | [
"if the azonalness does not occur not the shopping but the furling breastplate occurs."
] | if the azonalness does not occur not the shopping but the furling breastplate occurs. | the azonalness does not occur. |
the lure is not expendable. | sent1: that the riboflavin is neuropsychological is right. sent2: the lure is a amine. sent3: the lure is inhumane. sent4: the acrosome does sing abomination if that it does inhabit is true. sent5: the recapitulation is neuropsychological. sent6: the lure is Shuha. sent7: if the lure is Solomonic it sonnets. sent8: the moonflower is neuropsychological. sent9: the stoma is neuropsychological. sent10: the nozzle is neuropsychological. sent11: the lure is neuropsychological. sent12: the lure is expendable if it is neuropsychological. sent13: if the lure is neuropsychological it is manageable. sent14: the tryptophan is expendable. sent15: if the lure does unfasten Momotidae then it unfastens aerology. | ¬{B}{a} | sent1: {A}{do} sent2: {JD}{a} sent3: {EP}{a} sent4: {DG}{ih} -> {CQ}{ih} sent5: {A}{au} sent6: {JB}{a} sent7: {EM}{a} -> {E}{a} sent8: {A}{hf} sent9: {A}{ds} sent10: {A}{fn} sent11: {A}{a} sent12: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} sent13: {A}{a} -> {CI}{a} sent14: {B}{fu} sent15: {IJ}{a} -> {GM}{a} | [
"sent12 & sent11 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent12 & sent11 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 13 | null | null | null | [] | null | null | $hypothesis$ = the lure is not expendable. ; $context$ = sent1: that the riboflavin is neuropsychological is right. sent2: the lure is a amine. sent3: the lure is inhumane. sent4: the acrosome does sing abomination if that it does inhabit is true. sent5: the recapitulation is neuropsychological. sent6: the lure is Shuha. sent7: if the lure is Solomonic it sonnets. sent8: the moonflower is neuropsychological. sent9: the stoma is neuropsychological. sent10: the nozzle is neuropsychological. sent11: the lure is neuropsychological. sent12: the lure is expendable if it is neuropsychological. sent13: if the lure is neuropsychological it is manageable. sent14: the tryptophan is expendable. sent15: if the lure does unfasten Momotidae then it unfastens aerology. ; $proof$ = | sent12 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the lure is expendable if it is neuropsychological. | [
"the lure is neuropsychological."
] | [
"the lure is expendable if it is neuropsychological."
] | the lure is expendable if it is neuropsychological. | the lure is neuropsychological. |
the programmer does not scythe confederate. | sent1: there exists something such that that it is not full and it does not repaint is not correct. sent2: there exists something such that that it is not an adolescent and it is not a sonogram does not hold. sent3: if something is not a midsummer then it is not safe. sent4: the countertop is not a kind of a midsummer if that it does unfasten mongoose and is a kind of a Morocco is not true. sent5: if something is not a safe then the fact that it does not scythe confederate and sings countertop does not hold. sent6: the programmer sings countertop if there is something such that that it is both not an adolescent and not a sonogram does not hold. sent7: if the Maya is not a kind of a Morocco then the raise is a safe but it is not a midsummer. sent8: if something is not acroscopic then it scythes confederate and it does sing countertop. sent9: if there are adolescent things that the programmer sings countertop hold. sent10: the raise is not non-acroscopic. sent11: if something that sings countertop is acroscopic then it does not scythe confederate. sent12: if the raise is a safe and is not a midsummer that the programmer is not acroscopic is true. | ¬{C}{a} | sent1: (Ex): ¬(¬{FM}x & ¬{HU}x) sent2: (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent3: (x): ¬{E}x -> ¬{D}x sent4: ¬({G}{bm} & {F}{bm}) -> ¬{E}{bm} sent5: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬(¬{C}x & {A}x) sent6: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {A}{a} sent7: ¬{F}{c} -> ({D}{b} & ¬{E}{b}) sent8: (x): ¬{B}x -> ({C}x & {A}x) sent9: (x): {AA}x -> {A}{a} sent10: {B}{b} sent11: (x): ({A}x & {B}x) -> ¬{C}x sent12: ({D}{b} & ¬{E}{b}) -> ¬{B}{a} | [
"sent2 & sent6 -> int1: the programmer sings countertop.; sent11 -> int2: the programmer does not scythe confederate if it does sing countertop and it is acroscopic.;"
] | UNKNOWN | [
"sent2 & sent6 -> int1: {A}{a}; sent11 -> int2: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{C}{a};"
] | UNKNOWN | 3 | null | 8 | 0 | 8 | the programmer scythes confederate. | {C}{a} | 6 | [
"sent8 -> int3: the programmer scythes confederate and sings countertop if it is not acroscopic.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the programmer does not scythe confederate. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that that it is not full and it does not repaint is not correct. sent2: there exists something such that that it is not an adolescent and it is not a sonogram does not hold. sent3: if something is not a midsummer then it is not safe. sent4: the countertop is not a kind of a midsummer if that it does unfasten mongoose and is a kind of a Morocco is not true. sent5: if something is not a safe then the fact that it does not scythe confederate and sings countertop does not hold. sent6: the programmer sings countertop if there is something such that that it is both not an adolescent and not a sonogram does not hold. sent7: if the Maya is not a kind of a Morocco then the raise is a safe but it is not a midsummer. sent8: if something is not acroscopic then it scythes confederate and it does sing countertop. sent9: if there are adolescent things that the programmer sings countertop hold. sent10: the raise is not non-acroscopic. sent11: if something that sings countertop is acroscopic then it does not scythe confederate. sent12: if the raise is a safe and is not a midsummer that the programmer is not acroscopic is true. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | there exists something such that that it is not an adolescent and it is not a sonogram does not hold. | [
"the programmer sings countertop if there is something such that that it is both not an adolescent and not a sonogram does not hold.",
"if something that sings countertop is acroscopic then it does not scythe confederate."
] | [
"It is not a sonogram that holds that it is not an adolescent.",
"It isn't a sonogram that doesn't hold, and it isn't an adolescent either."
] | It is not a sonogram that holds that it is not an adolescent. | the programmer sings countertop if there is something such that that it is both not an adolescent and not a sonogram does not hold. |
the programmer does not scythe confederate. | sent1: there exists something such that that it is not full and it does not repaint is not correct. sent2: there exists something such that that it is not an adolescent and it is not a sonogram does not hold. sent3: if something is not a midsummer then it is not safe. sent4: the countertop is not a kind of a midsummer if that it does unfasten mongoose and is a kind of a Morocco is not true. sent5: if something is not a safe then the fact that it does not scythe confederate and sings countertop does not hold. sent6: the programmer sings countertop if there is something such that that it is both not an adolescent and not a sonogram does not hold. sent7: if the Maya is not a kind of a Morocco then the raise is a safe but it is not a midsummer. sent8: if something is not acroscopic then it scythes confederate and it does sing countertop. sent9: if there are adolescent things that the programmer sings countertop hold. sent10: the raise is not non-acroscopic. sent11: if something that sings countertop is acroscopic then it does not scythe confederate. sent12: if the raise is a safe and is not a midsummer that the programmer is not acroscopic is true. | ¬{C}{a} | sent1: (Ex): ¬(¬{FM}x & ¬{HU}x) sent2: (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent3: (x): ¬{E}x -> ¬{D}x sent4: ¬({G}{bm} & {F}{bm}) -> ¬{E}{bm} sent5: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬(¬{C}x & {A}x) sent6: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {A}{a} sent7: ¬{F}{c} -> ({D}{b} & ¬{E}{b}) sent8: (x): ¬{B}x -> ({C}x & {A}x) sent9: (x): {AA}x -> {A}{a} sent10: {B}{b} sent11: (x): ({A}x & {B}x) -> ¬{C}x sent12: ({D}{b} & ¬{E}{b}) -> ¬{B}{a} | [
"sent2 & sent6 -> int1: the programmer sings countertop.; sent11 -> int2: the programmer does not scythe confederate if it does sing countertop and it is acroscopic.;"
] | UNKNOWN | [
"sent2 & sent6 -> int1: {A}{a}; sent11 -> int2: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{C}{a};"
] | UNKNOWN | 3 | null | 8 | 0 | 8 | the programmer scythes confederate. | {C}{a} | 6 | [
"sent8 -> int3: the programmer scythes confederate and sings countertop if it is not acroscopic.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the programmer does not scythe confederate. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that that it is not full and it does not repaint is not correct. sent2: there exists something such that that it is not an adolescent and it is not a sonogram does not hold. sent3: if something is not a midsummer then it is not safe. sent4: the countertop is not a kind of a midsummer if that it does unfasten mongoose and is a kind of a Morocco is not true. sent5: if something is not a safe then the fact that it does not scythe confederate and sings countertop does not hold. sent6: the programmer sings countertop if there is something such that that it is both not an adolescent and not a sonogram does not hold. sent7: if the Maya is not a kind of a Morocco then the raise is a safe but it is not a midsummer. sent8: if something is not acroscopic then it scythes confederate and it does sing countertop. sent9: if there are adolescent things that the programmer sings countertop hold. sent10: the raise is not non-acroscopic. sent11: if something that sings countertop is acroscopic then it does not scythe confederate. sent12: if the raise is a safe and is not a midsummer that the programmer is not acroscopic is true. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | there exists something such that that it is not an adolescent and it is not a sonogram does not hold. | [
"the programmer sings countertop if there is something such that that it is both not an adolescent and not a sonogram does not hold.",
"if something that sings countertop is acroscopic then it does not scythe confederate."
] | [
"It is not a sonogram that holds that it is not an adolescent.",
"It isn't a sonogram that doesn't hold, and it isn't an adolescent either."
] | It isn't a sonogram that doesn't hold, and it isn't an adolescent either. | if something that sings countertop is acroscopic then it does not scythe confederate. |
the fact that the linkboy is not a nose and is a buck is not correct. | sent1: the fact that the casein is not a rock but a nose is not right. sent2: the limber sings moloch. sent3: the fact that the linkboy is not a kind of a buck and noses is not right if the limber is a noses. sent4: the fact that the limber is a nose is not incorrect. sent5: the limber is a toothache. sent6: if the limber bucks the fact that the linkboy is both not a nose and a bucks is not true. sent7: if the limber is a toothache then it bucks. sent8: the fact that the moloch is not a Offenbach but it is gutless is not right if the fact that it is not a toothache is not wrong. sent9: the fact that the limber is not a nose but it is a buck is wrong if the linkboy buck. | ¬(¬{D}{b} & {B}{b}) | sent1: ¬(¬{AE}{gr} & {D}{gr}) sent2: {JJ}{a} sent3: {D}{a} -> ¬(¬{B}{b} & {D}{b}) sent4: {D}{a} sent5: {A}{a} sent6: {B}{a} -> ¬(¬{D}{b} & {B}{b}) sent7: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} sent8: ¬{A}{dr} -> ¬(¬{JB}{dr} & {K}{dr}) sent9: {B}{b} -> ¬(¬{D}{a} & {B}{a}) | [
"sent7 & sent5 -> int1: the limber bucks.; sent6 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent7 & sent5 -> int1: {B}{a}; sent6 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 2 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 6 | the fact that the moloch is not a Offenbach but gutless is not true. | ¬(¬{JB}{dr} & {K}{dr}) | 5 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the linkboy is not a nose and is a buck is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the casein is not a rock but a nose is not right. sent2: the limber sings moloch. sent3: the fact that the linkboy is not a kind of a buck and noses is not right if the limber is a noses. sent4: the fact that the limber is a nose is not incorrect. sent5: the limber is a toothache. sent6: if the limber bucks the fact that the linkboy is both not a nose and a bucks is not true. sent7: if the limber is a toothache then it bucks. sent8: the fact that the moloch is not a Offenbach but it is gutless is not right if the fact that it is not a toothache is not wrong. sent9: the fact that the limber is not a nose but it is a buck is wrong if the linkboy buck. ; $proof$ = | sent7 & sent5 -> int1: the limber bucks.; sent6 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | if the limber is a toothache then it bucks. | [
"the limber is a toothache.",
"if the limber bucks the fact that the linkboy is both not a nose and a bucks is not true."
] | [
"If it's a toothache, then it's a limber.",
"If it's a pain, then it's a limber."
] | If it's a toothache, then it's a limber. | the limber is a toothache. |
the fact that the linkboy is not a nose and is a buck is not correct. | sent1: the fact that the casein is not a rock but a nose is not right. sent2: the limber sings moloch. sent3: the fact that the linkboy is not a kind of a buck and noses is not right if the limber is a noses. sent4: the fact that the limber is a nose is not incorrect. sent5: the limber is a toothache. sent6: if the limber bucks the fact that the linkboy is both not a nose and a bucks is not true. sent7: if the limber is a toothache then it bucks. sent8: the fact that the moloch is not a Offenbach but it is gutless is not right if the fact that it is not a toothache is not wrong. sent9: the fact that the limber is not a nose but it is a buck is wrong if the linkboy buck. | ¬(¬{D}{b} & {B}{b}) | sent1: ¬(¬{AE}{gr} & {D}{gr}) sent2: {JJ}{a} sent3: {D}{a} -> ¬(¬{B}{b} & {D}{b}) sent4: {D}{a} sent5: {A}{a} sent6: {B}{a} -> ¬(¬{D}{b} & {B}{b}) sent7: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} sent8: ¬{A}{dr} -> ¬(¬{JB}{dr} & {K}{dr}) sent9: {B}{b} -> ¬(¬{D}{a} & {B}{a}) | [
"sent7 & sent5 -> int1: the limber bucks.; sent6 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent7 & sent5 -> int1: {B}{a}; sent6 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 2 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 6 | the fact that the moloch is not a Offenbach but gutless is not true. | ¬(¬{JB}{dr} & {K}{dr}) | 5 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the linkboy is not a nose and is a buck is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the casein is not a rock but a nose is not right. sent2: the limber sings moloch. sent3: the fact that the linkboy is not a kind of a buck and noses is not right if the limber is a noses. sent4: the fact that the limber is a nose is not incorrect. sent5: the limber is a toothache. sent6: if the limber bucks the fact that the linkboy is both not a nose and a bucks is not true. sent7: if the limber is a toothache then it bucks. sent8: the fact that the moloch is not a Offenbach but it is gutless is not right if the fact that it is not a toothache is not wrong. sent9: the fact that the limber is not a nose but it is a buck is wrong if the linkboy buck. ; $proof$ = | sent7 & sent5 -> int1: the limber bucks.; sent6 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | if the limber is a toothache then it bucks. | [
"the limber is a toothache.",
"if the limber bucks the fact that the linkboy is both not a nose and a bucks is not true."
] | [
"If it's a toothache, then it's a limber.",
"If it's a pain, then it's a limber."
] | If it's a pain, then it's a limber. | if the limber bucks the fact that the linkboy is both not a nose and a bucks is not true. |
the satinet is a kind of a M. | sent1: if the fact that something is limbless and it is not unapproachable is correct then the satinet is a kind of a M. sent2: if something is a kind of a M and is a Medellin the satinet incurs. sent3: if something that is a kind of a licitness is catabolic the satinet is approachable. sent4: there is something such that it is comprehensive. sent5: the satinet is limbless if something is manorial and it clusters. sent6: there exists something such that it is a kind of a Serbian and it is a Lipscomb. sent7: something is a kind of limbless thing that is approachable. sent8: that the satinet is not a kind of a M is not false if there exists something such that it is not limbless. sent9: there is something such that it is a Esox. sent10: there is something such that it is a kind of a M. sent11: that the satinet is meridional is true. sent12: the fact that the ibex is limbless is correct. sent13: the satinet is approachable. | {C}{a} | sent1: (x): ({A}x & {B}x) -> {C}{a} sent2: (x): ({C}x & {IR}x) -> {IP}{a} sent3: (x): ({EB}x & {AC}x) -> {B}{a} sent4: (Ex): {FF}x sent5: (x): ({U}x & {FA}x) -> {A}{a} sent6: (Ex): ({IB}x & {IF}x) sent7: (Ex): ({A}x & {B}x) sent8: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬{C}{a} sent9: (Ex): {HI}x sent10: (Ex): {C}x sent11: {DU}{a} sent12: {A}{if} sent13: {B}{a} | [
"sent7 & sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent7 & sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 1 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 11 | that the satinet is not a kind of a M hold. | ¬{C}{a} | 6 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the satinet is a kind of a M. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something is limbless and it is not unapproachable is correct then the satinet is a kind of a M. sent2: if something is a kind of a M and is a Medellin the satinet incurs. sent3: if something that is a kind of a licitness is catabolic the satinet is approachable. sent4: there is something such that it is comprehensive. sent5: the satinet is limbless if something is manorial and it clusters. sent6: there exists something such that it is a kind of a Serbian and it is a Lipscomb. sent7: something is a kind of limbless thing that is approachable. sent8: that the satinet is not a kind of a M is not false if there exists something such that it is not limbless. sent9: there is something such that it is a Esox. sent10: there is something such that it is a kind of a M. sent11: that the satinet is meridional is true. sent12: the fact that the ibex is limbless is correct. sent13: the satinet is approachable. ; $proof$ = | sent7 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | something is a kind of limbless thing that is approachable. | [
"if the fact that something is limbless and it is not unapproachable is correct then the satinet is a kind of a M."
] | [
"something is a kind of limbless thing that is approachable."
] | something is a kind of limbless thing that is approachable. | if the fact that something is limbless and it is not unapproachable is correct then the satinet is a kind of a M. |
the viscounty does not sing actor. | sent1: if something is a Phasianidae then it is not infinitival and/or it is not a kind of a climatologist. sent2: the viscounty does not furl cacophony. sent3: the viscounty does sing actor if the SI does not reorganize and does not scythe gelatinousness. sent4: if the door is not a Caucasus then it is a Phasianidae and is not non-aeromechanics. sent5: if the door furls cacophony but it does not scythe gelatinousness then the viscounty does not sing actor. sent6: if the door furls cacophony it scythes gelatinousness. sent7: the SI does not furl cacophony and it does not reorganize if the door does reorganize. sent8: the SI sings preamble if it is tertian. sent9: the fact that the SI does furl cacophony is not incorrect if that it scythes gelatinousness is not false. sent10: The cacophony furls door. sent11: if the viscounty does scythe gelatinousness but it does not sing actor the door furls cacophony. sent12: if something does reorganize then it furls cacophony and does not scythe gelatinousness. sent13: the pome does not scythe gelatinousness. sent14: if the SI does sing actor but it does not furl cacophony the viscounty reorganizes. sent15: the door is not a kind of a Caucasus if that the SI is not a kind of a Caucasus and is hypoglycemic is not right. sent16: the SI does not reorganize and does not scythe gelatinousness if the door scythe gelatinousness. sent17: the door unfastens Lygus. sent18: the door does not reorganize. sent19: if something is not infinitival or it is not a climatologist or both then that it reorganizes hold. sent20: the door does scythe gelatinousness if it reorganizes. sent21: the door furls cacophony. sent22: the SI does not scythe gelatinousness and it does not sing actor. | ¬{D}{c} | sent1: (x): {G}x -> (¬{F}x v ¬{E}x) sent2: ¬{A}{c} sent3: (¬{C}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) -> {D}{c} sent4: ¬{I}{a} -> ({G}{a} & {H}{a}) sent5: ({A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> ¬{D}{c} sent6: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} sent7: {C}{a} -> (¬{A}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) sent8: {II}{b} -> {FN}{b} sent9: {B}{b} -> {A}{b} sent10: {AA}{aa} sent11: ({B}{c} & ¬{D}{c}) -> {A}{a} sent12: (x): {C}x -> ({A}x & ¬{B}x) sent13: ¬{B}{hk} sent14: ({D}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) -> {C}{c} sent15: ¬(¬{I}{b} & {K}{b}) -> ¬{I}{a} sent16: {B}{a} -> (¬{C}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) sent17: {BN}{a} sent18: ¬{C}{a} sent19: (x): (¬{F}x v ¬{E}x) -> {C}x sent20: {C}{a} -> {B}{a} sent21: {A}{a} sent22: (¬{B}{b} & ¬{D}{b}) | [
"sent6 & sent21 -> int1: the door does scythe gelatinousness.; sent16 & int1 -> int2: the SI does not reorganize and does not scythe gelatinousness.; sent3 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent6 & sent21 -> int1: {B}{a}; sent16 & int1 -> int2: (¬{C}{b} & ¬{B}{b}); sent3 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 3 | 3 | 18 | 0 | 18 | the viscounty does not sing actor. | ¬{D}{c} | 8 | [
"sent12 -> int3: if the door reorganizes that it does furl cacophony and does not scythe gelatinousness is true.; sent19 -> int4: the fact that the door reorganizes is true if it is not infinitival or it is not a climatologist or both.; sent1 -> int5: the door is either not infinitival or not a climatologist or both if it is a Phasianidae.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the viscounty does not sing actor. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a Phasianidae then it is not infinitival and/or it is not a kind of a climatologist. sent2: the viscounty does not furl cacophony. sent3: the viscounty does sing actor if the SI does not reorganize and does not scythe gelatinousness. sent4: if the door is not a Caucasus then it is a Phasianidae and is not non-aeromechanics. sent5: if the door furls cacophony but it does not scythe gelatinousness then the viscounty does not sing actor. sent6: if the door furls cacophony it scythes gelatinousness. sent7: the SI does not furl cacophony and it does not reorganize if the door does reorganize. sent8: the SI sings preamble if it is tertian. sent9: the fact that the SI does furl cacophony is not incorrect if that it scythes gelatinousness is not false. sent10: The cacophony furls door. sent11: if the viscounty does scythe gelatinousness but it does not sing actor the door furls cacophony. sent12: if something does reorganize then it furls cacophony and does not scythe gelatinousness. sent13: the pome does not scythe gelatinousness. sent14: if the SI does sing actor but it does not furl cacophony the viscounty reorganizes. sent15: the door is not a kind of a Caucasus if that the SI is not a kind of a Caucasus and is hypoglycemic is not right. sent16: the SI does not reorganize and does not scythe gelatinousness if the door scythe gelatinousness. sent17: the door unfastens Lygus. sent18: the door does not reorganize. sent19: if something is not infinitival or it is not a climatologist or both then that it reorganizes hold. sent20: the door does scythe gelatinousness if it reorganizes. sent21: the door furls cacophony. sent22: the SI does not scythe gelatinousness and it does not sing actor. ; $proof$ = | sent6 & sent21 -> int1: the door does scythe gelatinousness.; sent16 & int1 -> int2: the SI does not reorganize and does not scythe gelatinousness.; sent3 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | if the door furls cacophony it scythes gelatinousness. | [
"the door furls cacophony.",
"the SI does not reorganize and does not scythe gelatinousness if the door scythe gelatinousness.",
"the viscounty does sing actor if the SI does not reorganize and does not scythe gelatinousness."
] | [
"If the door is loud, it's scythes.",
"The door is loud if it furls.",
"If the door makes noise, it's scythes."
] | If the door is loud, it's scythes. | the door furls cacophony. |
the viscounty does not sing actor. | sent1: if something is a Phasianidae then it is not infinitival and/or it is not a kind of a climatologist. sent2: the viscounty does not furl cacophony. sent3: the viscounty does sing actor if the SI does not reorganize and does not scythe gelatinousness. sent4: if the door is not a Caucasus then it is a Phasianidae and is not non-aeromechanics. sent5: if the door furls cacophony but it does not scythe gelatinousness then the viscounty does not sing actor. sent6: if the door furls cacophony it scythes gelatinousness. sent7: the SI does not furl cacophony and it does not reorganize if the door does reorganize. sent8: the SI sings preamble if it is tertian. sent9: the fact that the SI does furl cacophony is not incorrect if that it scythes gelatinousness is not false. sent10: The cacophony furls door. sent11: if the viscounty does scythe gelatinousness but it does not sing actor the door furls cacophony. sent12: if something does reorganize then it furls cacophony and does not scythe gelatinousness. sent13: the pome does not scythe gelatinousness. sent14: if the SI does sing actor but it does not furl cacophony the viscounty reorganizes. sent15: the door is not a kind of a Caucasus if that the SI is not a kind of a Caucasus and is hypoglycemic is not right. sent16: the SI does not reorganize and does not scythe gelatinousness if the door scythe gelatinousness. sent17: the door unfastens Lygus. sent18: the door does not reorganize. sent19: if something is not infinitival or it is not a climatologist or both then that it reorganizes hold. sent20: the door does scythe gelatinousness if it reorganizes. sent21: the door furls cacophony. sent22: the SI does not scythe gelatinousness and it does not sing actor. | ¬{D}{c} | sent1: (x): {G}x -> (¬{F}x v ¬{E}x) sent2: ¬{A}{c} sent3: (¬{C}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) -> {D}{c} sent4: ¬{I}{a} -> ({G}{a} & {H}{a}) sent5: ({A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> ¬{D}{c} sent6: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} sent7: {C}{a} -> (¬{A}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) sent8: {II}{b} -> {FN}{b} sent9: {B}{b} -> {A}{b} sent10: {AA}{aa} sent11: ({B}{c} & ¬{D}{c}) -> {A}{a} sent12: (x): {C}x -> ({A}x & ¬{B}x) sent13: ¬{B}{hk} sent14: ({D}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) -> {C}{c} sent15: ¬(¬{I}{b} & {K}{b}) -> ¬{I}{a} sent16: {B}{a} -> (¬{C}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) sent17: {BN}{a} sent18: ¬{C}{a} sent19: (x): (¬{F}x v ¬{E}x) -> {C}x sent20: {C}{a} -> {B}{a} sent21: {A}{a} sent22: (¬{B}{b} & ¬{D}{b}) | [
"sent6 & sent21 -> int1: the door does scythe gelatinousness.; sent16 & int1 -> int2: the SI does not reorganize and does not scythe gelatinousness.; sent3 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent6 & sent21 -> int1: {B}{a}; sent16 & int1 -> int2: (¬{C}{b} & ¬{B}{b}); sent3 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 3 | 3 | 18 | 0 | 18 | the viscounty does not sing actor. | ¬{D}{c} | 8 | [
"sent12 -> int3: if the door reorganizes that it does furl cacophony and does not scythe gelatinousness is true.; sent19 -> int4: the fact that the door reorganizes is true if it is not infinitival or it is not a climatologist or both.; sent1 -> int5: the door is either not infinitival or not a climatologist or both if it is a Phasianidae.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the viscounty does not sing actor. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a Phasianidae then it is not infinitival and/or it is not a kind of a climatologist. sent2: the viscounty does not furl cacophony. sent3: the viscounty does sing actor if the SI does not reorganize and does not scythe gelatinousness. sent4: if the door is not a Caucasus then it is a Phasianidae and is not non-aeromechanics. sent5: if the door furls cacophony but it does not scythe gelatinousness then the viscounty does not sing actor. sent6: if the door furls cacophony it scythes gelatinousness. sent7: the SI does not furl cacophony and it does not reorganize if the door does reorganize. sent8: the SI sings preamble if it is tertian. sent9: the fact that the SI does furl cacophony is not incorrect if that it scythes gelatinousness is not false. sent10: The cacophony furls door. sent11: if the viscounty does scythe gelatinousness but it does not sing actor the door furls cacophony. sent12: if something does reorganize then it furls cacophony and does not scythe gelatinousness. sent13: the pome does not scythe gelatinousness. sent14: if the SI does sing actor but it does not furl cacophony the viscounty reorganizes. sent15: the door is not a kind of a Caucasus if that the SI is not a kind of a Caucasus and is hypoglycemic is not right. sent16: the SI does not reorganize and does not scythe gelatinousness if the door scythe gelatinousness. sent17: the door unfastens Lygus. sent18: the door does not reorganize. sent19: if something is not infinitival or it is not a climatologist or both then that it reorganizes hold. sent20: the door does scythe gelatinousness if it reorganizes. sent21: the door furls cacophony. sent22: the SI does not scythe gelatinousness and it does not sing actor. ; $proof$ = | sent6 & sent21 -> int1: the door does scythe gelatinousness.; sent16 & int1 -> int2: the SI does not reorganize and does not scythe gelatinousness.; sent3 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | if the door furls cacophony it scythes gelatinousness. | [
"the door furls cacophony.",
"the SI does not reorganize and does not scythe gelatinousness if the door scythe gelatinousness.",
"the viscounty does sing actor if the SI does not reorganize and does not scythe gelatinousness."
] | [
"If the door is loud, it's scythes.",
"The door is loud if it furls.",
"If the door makes noise, it's scythes."
] | The door is loud if it furls. | the SI does not reorganize and does not scythe gelatinousness if the door scythe gelatinousness. |
the viscounty does not sing actor. | sent1: if something is a Phasianidae then it is not infinitival and/or it is not a kind of a climatologist. sent2: the viscounty does not furl cacophony. sent3: the viscounty does sing actor if the SI does not reorganize and does not scythe gelatinousness. sent4: if the door is not a Caucasus then it is a Phasianidae and is not non-aeromechanics. sent5: if the door furls cacophony but it does not scythe gelatinousness then the viscounty does not sing actor. sent6: if the door furls cacophony it scythes gelatinousness. sent7: the SI does not furl cacophony and it does not reorganize if the door does reorganize. sent8: the SI sings preamble if it is tertian. sent9: the fact that the SI does furl cacophony is not incorrect if that it scythes gelatinousness is not false. sent10: The cacophony furls door. sent11: if the viscounty does scythe gelatinousness but it does not sing actor the door furls cacophony. sent12: if something does reorganize then it furls cacophony and does not scythe gelatinousness. sent13: the pome does not scythe gelatinousness. sent14: if the SI does sing actor but it does not furl cacophony the viscounty reorganizes. sent15: the door is not a kind of a Caucasus if that the SI is not a kind of a Caucasus and is hypoglycemic is not right. sent16: the SI does not reorganize and does not scythe gelatinousness if the door scythe gelatinousness. sent17: the door unfastens Lygus. sent18: the door does not reorganize. sent19: if something is not infinitival or it is not a climatologist or both then that it reorganizes hold. sent20: the door does scythe gelatinousness if it reorganizes. sent21: the door furls cacophony. sent22: the SI does not scythe gelatinousness and it does not sing actor. | ¬{D}{c} | sent1: (x): {G}x -> (¬{F}x v ¬{E}x) sent2: ¬{A}{c} sent3: (¬{C}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) -> {D}{c} sent4: ¬{I}{a} -> ({G}{a} & {H}{a}) sent5: ({A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> ¬{D}{c} sent6: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} sent7: {C}{a} -> (¬{A}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) sent8: {II}{b} -> {FN}{b} sent9: {B}{b} -> {A}{b} sent10: {AA}{aa} sent11: ({B}{c} & ¬{D}{c}) -> {A}{a} sent12: (x): {C}x -> ({A}x & ¬{B}x) sent13: ¬{B}{hk} sent14: ({D}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) -> {C}{c} sent15: ¬(¬{I}{b} & {K}{b}) -> ¬{I}{a} sent16: {B}{a} -> (¬{C}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) sent17: {BN}{a} sent18: ¬{C}{a} sent19: (x): (¬{F}x v ¬{E}x) -> {C}x sent20: {C}{a} -> {B}{a} sent21: {A}{a} sent22: (¬{B}{b} & ¬{D}{b}) | [
"sent6 & sent21 -> int1: the door does scythe gelatinousness.; sent16 & int1 -> int2: the SI does not reorganize and does not scythe gelatinousness.; sent3 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent6 & sent21 -> int1: {B}{a}; sent16 & int1 -> int2: (¬{C}{b} & ¬{B}{b}); sent3 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 3 | 3 | 18 | 0 | 18 | the viscounty does not sing actor. | ¬{D}{c} | 8 | [
"sent12 -> int3: if the door reorganizes that it does furl cacophony and does not scythe gelatinousness is true.; sent19 -> int4: the fact that the door reorganizes is true if it is not infinitival or it is not a climatologist or both.; sent1 -> int5: the door is either not infinitival or not a climatologist or both if it is a Phasianidae.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the viscounty does not sing actor. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a Phasianidae then it is not infinitival and/or it is not a kind of a climatologist. sent2: the viscounty does not furl cacophony. sent3: the viscounty does sing actor if the SI does not reorganize and does not scythe gelatinousness. sent4: if the door is not a Caucasus then it is a Phasianidae and is not non-aeromechanics. sent5: if the door furls cacophony but it does not scythe gelatinousness then the viscounty does not sing actor. sent6: if the door furls cacophony it scythes gelatinousness. sent7: the SI does not furl cacophony and it does not reorganize if the door does reorganize. sent8: the SI sings preamble if it is tertian. sent9: the fact that the SI does furl cacophony is not incorrect if that it scythes gelatinousness is not false. sent10: The cacophony furls door. sent11: if the viscounty does scythe gelatinousness but it does not sing actor the door furls cacophony. sent12: if something does reorganize then it furls cacophony and does not scythe gelatinousness. sent13: the pome does not scythe gelatinousness. sent14: if the SI does sing actor but it does not furl cacophony the viscounty reorganizes. sent15: the door is not a kind of a Caucasus if that the SI is not a kind of a Caucasus and is hypoglycemic is not right. sent16: the SI does not reorganize and does not scythe gelatinousness if the door scythe gelatinousness. sent17: the door unfastens Lygus. sent18: the door does not reorganize. sent19: if something is not infinitival or it is not a climatologist or both then that it reorganizes hold. sent20: the door does scythe gelatinousness if it reorganizes. sent21: the door furls cacophony. sent22: the SI does not scythe gelatinousness and it does not sing actor. ; $proof$ = | sent6 & sent21 -> int1: the door does scythe gelatinousness.; sent16 & int1 -> int2: the SI does not reorganize and does not scythe gelatinousness.; sent3 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | if the door furls cacophony it scythes gelatinousness. | [
"the door furls cacophony.",
"the SI does not reorganize and does not scythe gelatinousness if the door scythe gelatinousness.",
"the viscounty does sing actor if the SI does not reorganize and does not scythe gelatinousness."
] | [
"If the door is loud, it's scythes.",
"The door is loud if it furls.",
"If the door makes noise, it's scythes."
] | If the door makes noise, it's scythes. | the viscounty does sing actor if the SI does not reorganize and does not scythe gelatinousness. |
the non-progressiveness and the non-centrifugalness happens. | sent1: if the singing animator does not occur then the fact that the singing basil does not occur and the quantitativeness does not occur is not correct. sent2: if the fact that the centrifugalness and the non-quantitativeness happens does not hold then the centrifugalness does not occur. sent3: that the fact that the centrifugalness occurs but the quantitativeness does not occur does not hold hold. sent4: if the singing basil does not occur the fact that the belay occurs and the abrasion happens is wrong. sent5: that the progressiveness does not occur is triggered by that the belay happens. sent6: the singing basil does not occur. sent7: both the non-progressiveness and the centrifugalness happens if the singing animator happens. sent8: that the fact that not the crackle but the plain occurs is wrong is not incorrect if the amnestying does not occur. sent9: the fact that the vigilantism does not occur but the condescension occurs is false. sent10: the heraldicness does not occur. sent11: the Samoan does not occur and the hiring does not occur. sent12: the restriction does not occur. sent13: the singing basil triggers that the furling epigone does not occur and the raylessness does not occur. sent14: the resoluteness does not occur. sent15: that the belaying and the abrasion occurs is wrong. sent16: that the progressiveness does not occur and the centrifugalness does not occur is not right if the fact that the singing basil occurs is correct. sent17: the progressive does not occur if the fact that the belaying does not occur and the abrasion occurs is not true. sent18: the crying does not occur and the predation does not occur. sent19: the fact that the furling stirk happens but the singing absentee does not occur is wrong. sent20: the fact that not the belaying but the abrasion occurs is not right if the singing basil does not occur. sent21: that the singing absentee does not occur hold if the overpressure does not occur. | (¬{B} & ¬{C}) | sent1: ¬{D} -> ¬(¬{A} & ¬{E}) sent2: ¬({C} & ¬{E}) -> ¬{C} sent3: ¬({C} & ¬{E}) sent4: ¬{A} -> ¬({AA} & {AB}) sent5: {AA} -> ¬{B} sent6: ¬{A} sent7: {D} -> (¬{B} & {C}) sent8: ¬{CO} -> ¬(¬{CT} & {IN}) sent9: ¬(¬{BG} & {DG}) sent10: ¬{FB} sent11: (¬{AJ} & ¬{FK}) sent12: ¬{AE} sent13: {A} -> (¬{DO} & ¬{GR}) sent14: ¬{HR} sent15: ¬({AA} & {AB}) sent16: {A} -> ¬(¬{B} & ¬{C}) sent17: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} sent18: (¬{EA} & ¬{BR}) sent19: ¬({FS} & ¬{HQ}) sent20: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) sent21: ¬{AP} -> ¬{HQ} | [
"sent20 & sent6 -> int1: the fact that not the belay but the abrasion occurs is incorrect.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the progressive does not occur.; sent2 & sent3 -> int3: the centrifugalness does not occur.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent20 & sent6 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}); int1 & sent17 -> int2: ¬{B}; sent2 & sent3 -> int3: ¬{C}; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 3 | 3 | 16 | 0 | 16 | the fact that the progressiveness does not occur and the centrifugalness does not occur is incorrect. | ¬(¬{B} & ¬{C}) | 7 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the non-progressiveness and the non-centrifugalness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the singing animator does not occur then the fact that the singing basil does not occur and the quantitativeness does not occur is not correct. sent2: if the fact that the centrifugalness and the non-quantitativeness happens does not hold then the centrifugalness does not occur. sent3: that the fact that the centrifugalness occurs but the quantitativeness does not occur does not hold hold. sent4: if the singing basil does not occur the fact that the belay occurs and the abrasion happens is wrong. sent5: that the progressiveness does not occur is triggered by that the belay happens. sent6: the singing basil does not occur. sent7: both the non-progressiveness and the centrifugalness happens if the singing animator happens. sent8: that the fact that not the crackle but the plain occurs is wrong is not incorrect if the amnestying does not occur. sent9: the fact that the vigilantism does not occur but the condescension occurs is false. sent10: the heraldicness does not occur. sent11: the Samoan does not occur and the hiring does not occur. sent12: the restriction does not occur. sent13: the singing basil triggers that the furling epigone does not occur and the raylessness does not occur. sent14: the resoluteness does not occur. sent15: that the belaying and the abrasion occurs is wrong. sent16: that the progressiveness does not occur and the centrifugalness does not occur is not right if the fact that the singing basil occurs is correct. sent17: the progressive does not occur if the fact that the belaying does not occur and the abrasion occurs is not true. sent18: the crying does not occur and the predation does not occur. sent19: the fact that the furling stirk happens but the singing absentee does not occur is wrong. sent20: the fact that not the belaying but the abrasion occurs is not right if the singing basil does not occur. sent21: that the singing absentee does not occur hold if the overpressure does not occur. ; $proof$ = | sent20 & sent6 -> int1: the fact that not the belay but the abrasion occurs is incorrect.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the progressive does not occur.; sent2 & sent3 -> int3: the centrifugalness does not occur.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the fact that not the belaying but the abrasion occurs is not right if the singing basil does not occur. | [
"the singing basil does not occur.",
"the progressive does not occur if the fact that the belaying does not occur and the abrasion occurs is not true.",
"if the fact that the centrifugalness and the non-quantitativeness happens does not hold then the centrifugalness does not occur.",
"that the fact that the centrifugalness occurs but the quantitativeness does not occur does not hold hold."
] | [
"If the singing basil does not occur, the fact that not the belaying but the abrasion occurs is not right.",
"If the singing basil does not occur, then the fact that not the belaying but the abrasion occurs is not right.",
"If the singing basil does not happen, the fact that not the belaying but the abrasion occurs is not right.",
"If singing basil does not occur, the fact that not the belaying but the abrasion occurs is not right."
] | If the singing basil does not occur, the fact that not the belaying but the abrasion occurs is not right. | the singing basil does not occur. |
the non-progressiveness and the non-centrifugalness happens. | sent1: if the singing animator does not occur then the fact that the singing basil does not occur and the quantitativeness does not occur is not correct. sent2: if the fact that the centrifugalness and the non-quantitativeness happens does not hold then the centrifugalness does not occur. sent3: that the fact that the centrifugalness occurs but the quantitativeness does not occur does not hold hold. sent4: if the singing basil does not occur the fact that the belay occurs and the abrasion happens is wrong. sent5: that the progressiveness does not occur is triggered by that the belay happens. sent6: the singing basil does not occur. sent7: both the non-progressiveness and the centrifugalness happens if the singing animator happens. sent8: that the fact that not the crackle but the plain occurs is wrong is not incorrect if the amnestying does not occur. sent9: the fact that the vigilantism does not occur but the condescension occurs is false. sent10: the heraldicness does not occur. sent11: the Samoan does not occur and the hiring does not occur. sent12: the restriction does not occur. sent13: the singing basil triggers that the furling epigone does not occur and the raylessness does not occur. sent14: the resoluteness does not occur. sent15: that the belaying and the abrasion occurs is wrong. sent16: that the progressiveness does not occur and the centrifugalness does not occur is not right if the fact that the singing basil occurs is correct. sent17: the progressive does not occur if the fact that the belaying does not occur and the abrasion occurs is not true. sent18: the crying does not occur and the predation does not occur. sent19: the fact that the furling stirk happens but the singing absentee does not occur is wrong. sent20: the fact that not the belaying but the abrasion occurs is not right if the singing basil does not occur. sent21: that the singing absentee does not occur hold if the overpressure does not occur. | (¬{B} & ¬{C}) | sent1: ¬{D} -> ¬(¬{A} & ¬{E}) sent2: ¬({C} & ¬{E}) -> ¬{C} sent3: ¬({C} & ¬{E}) sent4: ¬{A} -> ¬({AA} & {AB}) sent5: {AA} -> ¬{B} sent6: ¬{A} sent7: {D} -> (¬{B} & {C}) sent8: ¬{CO} -> ¬(¬{CT} & {IN}) sent9: ¬(¬{BG} & {DG}) sent10: ¬{FB} sent11: (¬{AJ} & ¬{FK}) sent12: ¬{AE} sent13: {A} -> (¬{DO} & ¬{GR}) sent14: ¬{HR} sent15: ¬({AA} & {AB}) sent16: {A} -> ¬(¬{B} & ¬{C}) sent17: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} sent18: (¬{EA} & ¬{BR}) sent19: ¬({FS} & ¬{HQ}) sent20: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) sent21: ¬{AP} -> ¬{HQ} | [
"sent20 & sent6 -> int1: the fact that not the belay but the abrasion occurs is incorrect.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the progressive does not occur.; sent2 & sent3 -> int3: the centrifugalness does not occur.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent20 & sent6 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}); int1 & sent17 -> int2: ¬{B}; sent2 & sent3 -> int3: ¬{C}; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 3 | 3 | 16 | 0 | 16 | the fact that the progressiveness does not occur and the centrifugalness does not occur is incorrect. | ¬(¬{B} & ¬{C}) | 7 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the non-progressiveness and the non-centrifugalness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the singing animator does not occur then the fact that the singing basil does not occur and the quantitativeness does not occur is not correct. sent2: if the fact that the centrifugalness and the non-quantitativeness happens does not hold then the centrifugalness does not occur. sent3: that the fact that the centrifugalness occurs but the quantitativeness does not occur does not hold hold. sent4: if the singing basil does not occur the fact that the belay occurs and the abrasion happens is wrong. sent5: that the progressiveness does not occur is triggered by that the belay happens. sent6: the singing basil does not occur. sent7: both the non-progressiveness and the centrifugalness happens if the singing animator happens. sent8: that the fact that not the crackle but the plain occurs is wrong is not incorrect if the amnestying does not occur. sent9: the fact that the vigilantism does not occur but the condescension occurs is false. sent10: the heraldicness does not occur. sent11: the Samoan does not occur and the hiring does not occur. sent12: the restriction does not occur. sent13: the singing basil triggers that the furling epigone does not occur and the raylessness does not occur. sent14: the resoluteness does not occur. sent15: that the belaying and the abrasion occurs is wrong. sent16: that the progressiveness does not occur and the centrifugalness does not occur is not right if the fact that the singing basil occurs is correct. sent17: the progressive does not occur if the fact that the belaying does not occur and the abrasion occurs is not true. sent18: the crying does not occur and the predation does not occur. sent19: the fact that the furling stirk happens but the singing absentee does not occur is wrong. sent20: the fact that not the belaying but the abrasion occurs is not right if the singing basil does not occur. sent21: that the singing absentee does not occur hold if the overpressure does not occur. ; $proof$ = | sent20 & sent6 -> int1: the fact that not the belay but the abrasion occurs is incorrect.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the progressive does not occur.; sent2 & sent3 -> int3: the centrifugalness does not occur.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the fact that not the belaying but the abrasion occurs is not right if the singing basil does not occur. | [
"the singing basil does not occur.",
"the progressive does not occur if the fact that the belaying does not occur and the abrasion occurs is not true.",
"if the fact that the centrifugalness and the non-quantitativeness happens does not hold then the centrifugalness does not occur.",
"that the fact that the centrifugalness occurs but the quantitativeness does not occur does not hold hold."
] | [
"If the singing basil does not occur, the fact that not the belaying but the abrasion occurs is not right.",
"If the singing basil does not occur, then the fact that not the belaying but the abrasion occurs is not right.",
"If the singing basil does not happen, the fact that not the belaying but the abrasion occurs is not right.",
"If singing basil does not occur, the fact that not the belaying but the abrasion occurs is not right."
] | If the singing basil does not occur, then the fact that not the belaying but the abrasion occurs is not right. | the progressive does not occur if the fact that the belaying does not occur and the abrasion occurs is not true. |
the non-progressiveness and the non-centrifugalness happens. | sent1: if the singing animator does not occur then the fact that the singing basil does not occur and the quantitativeness does not occur is not correct. sent2: if the fact that the centrifugalness and the non-quantitativeness happens does not hold then the centrifugalness does not occur. sent3: that the fact that the centrifugalness occurs but the quantitativeness does not occur does not hold hold. sent4: if the singing basil does not occur the fact that the belay occurs and the abrasion happens is wrong. sent5: that the progressiveness does not occur is triggered by that the belay happens. sent6: the singing basil does not occur. sent7: both the non-progressiveness and the centrifugalness happens if the singing animator happens. sent8: that the fact that not the crackle but the plain occurs is wrong is not incorrect if the amnestying does not occur. sent9: the fact that the vigilantism does not occur but the condescension occurs is false. sent10: the heraldicness does not occur. sent11: the Samoan does not occur and the hiring does not occur. sent12: the restriction does not occur. sent13: the singing basil triggers that the furling epigone does not occur and the raylessness does not occur. sent14: the resoluteness does not occur. sent15: that the belaying and the abrasion occurs is wrong. sent16: that the progressiveness does not occur and the centrifugalness does not occur is not right if the fact that the singing basil occurs is correct. sent17: the progressive does not occur if the fact that the belaying does not occur and the abrasion occurs is not true. sent18: the crying does not occur and the predation does not occur. sent19: the fact that the furling stirk happens but the singing absentee does not occur is wrong. sent20: the fact that not the belaying but the abrasion occurs is not right if the singing basil does not occur. sent21: that the singing absentee does not occur hold if the overpressure does not occur. | (¬{B} & ¬{C}) | sent1: ¬{D} -> ¬(¬{A} & ¬{E}) sent2: ¬({C} & ¬{E}) -> ¬{C} sent3: ¬({C} & ¬{E}) sent4: ¬{A} -> ¬({AA} & {AB}) sent5: {AA} -> ¬{B} sent6: ¬{A} sent7: {D} -> (¬{B} & {C}) sent8: ¬{CO} -> ¬(¬{CT} & {IN}) sent9: ¬(¬{BG} & {DG}) sent10: ¬{FB} sent11: (¬{AJ} & ¬{FK}) sent12: ¬{AE} sent13: {A} -> (¬{DO} & ¬{GR}) sent14: ¬{HR} sent15: ¬({AA} & {AB}) sent16: {A} -> ¬(¬{B} & ¬{C}) sent17: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} sent18: (¬{EA} & ¬{BR}) sent19: ¬({FS} & ¬{HQ}) sent20: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) sent21: ¬{AP} -> ¬{HQ} | [
"sent20 & sent6 -> int1: the fact that not the belay but the abrasion occurs is incorrect.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the progressive does not occur.; sent2 & sent3 -> int3: the centrifugalness does not occur.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent20 & sent6 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}); int1 & sent17 -> int2: ¬{B}; sent2 & sent3 -> int3: ¬{C}; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 3 | 3 | 16 | 0 | 16 | the fact that the progressiveness does not occur and the centrifugalness does not occur is incorrect. | ¬(¬{B} & ¬{C}) | 7 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the non-progressiveness and the non-centrifugalness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the singing animator does not occur then the fact that the singing basil does not occur and the quantitativeness does not occur is not correct. sent2: if the fact that the centrifugalness and the non-quantitativeness happens does not hold then the centrifugalness does not occur. sent3: that the fact that the centrifugalness occurs but the quantitativeness does not occur does not hold hold. sent4: if the singing basil does not occur the fact that the belay occurs and the abrasion happens is wrong. sent5: that the progressiveness does not occur is triggered by that the belay happens. sent6: the singing basil does not occur. sent7: both the non-progressiveness and the centrifugalness happens if the singing animator happens. sent8: that the fact that not the crackle but the plain occurs is wrong is not incorrect if the amnestying does not occur. sent9: the fact that the vigilantism does not occur but the condescension occurs is false. sent10: the heraldicness does not occur. sent11: the Samoan does not occur and the hiring does not occur. sent12: the restriction does not occur. sent13: the singing basil triggers that the furling epigone does not occur and the raylessness does not occur. sent14: the resoluteness does not occur. sent15: that the belaying and the abrasion occurs is wrong. sent16: that the progressiveness does not occur and the centrifugalness does not occur is not right if the fact that the singing basil occurs is correct. sent17: the progressive does not occur if the fact that the belaying does not occur and the abrasion occurs is not true. sent18: the crying does not occur and the predation does not occur. sent19: the fact that the furling stirk happens but the singing absentee does not occur is wrong. sent20: the fact that not the belaying but the abrasion occurs is not right if the singing basil does not occur. sent21: that the singing absentee does not occur hold if the overpressure does not occur. ; $proof$ = | sent20 & sent6 -> int1: the fact that not the belay but the abrasion occurs is incorrect.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the progressive does not occur.; sent2 & sent3 -> int3: the centrifugalness does not occur.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the fact that not the belaying but the abrasion occurs is not right if the singing basil does not occur. | [
"the singing basil does not occur.",
"the progressive does not occur if the fact that the belaying does not occur and the abrasion occurs is not true.",
"if the fact that the centrifugalness and the non-quantitativeness happens does not hold then the centrifugalness does not occur.",
"that the fact that the centrifugalness occurs but the quantitativeness does not occur does not hold hold."
] | [
"If the singing basil does not occur, the fact that not the belaying but the abrasion occurs is not right.",
"If the singing basil does not occur, then the fact that not the belaying but the abrasion occurs is not right.",
"If the singing basil does not happen, the fact that not the belaying but the abrasion occurs is not right.",
"If singing basil does not occur, the fact that not the belaying but the abrasion occurs is not right."
] | If the singing basil does not happen, the fact that not the belaying but the abrasion occurs is not right. | if the fact that the centrifugalness and the non-quantitativeness happens does not hold then the centrifugalness does not occur. |
the non-progressiveness and the non-centrifugalness happens. | sent1: if the singing animator does not occur then the fact that the singing basil does not occur and the quantitativeness does not occur is not correct. sent2: if the fact that the centrifugalness and the non-quantitativeness happens does not hold then the centrifugalness does not occur. sent3: that the fact that the centrifugalness occurs but the quantitativeness does not occur does not hold hold. sent4: if the singing basil does not occur the fact that the belay occurs and the abrasion happens is wrong. sent5: that the progressiveness does not occur is triggered by that the belay happens. sent6: the singing basil does not occur. sent7: both the non-progressiveness and the centrifugalness happens if the singing animator happens. sent8: that the fact that not the crackle but the plain occurs is wrong is not incorrect if the amnestying does not occur. sent9: the fact that the vigilantism does not occur but the condescension occurs is false. sent10: the heraldicness does not occur. sent11: the Samoan does not occur and the hiring does not occur. sent12: the restriction does not occur. sent13: the singing basil triggers that the furling epigone does not occur and the raylessness does not occur. sent14: the resoluteness does not occur. sent15: that the belaying and the abrasion occurs is wrong. sent16: that the progressiveness does not occur and the centrifugalness does not occur is not right if the fact that the singing basil occurs is correct. sent17: the progressive does not occur if the fact that the belaying does not occur and the abrasion occurs is not true. sent18: the crying does not occur and the predation does not occur. sent19: the fact that the furling stirk happens but the singing absentee does not occur is wrong. sent20: the fact that not the belaying but the abrasion occurs is not right if the singing basil does not occur. sent21: that the singing absentee does not occur hold if the overpressure does not occur. | (¬{B} & ¬{C}) | sent1: ¬{D} -> ¬(¬{A} & ¬{E}) sent2: ¬({C} & ¬{E}) -> ¬{C} sent3: ¬({C} & ¬{E}) sent4: ¬{A} -> ¬({AA} & {AB}) sent5: {AA} -> ¬{B} sent6: ¬{A} sent7: {D} -> (¬{B} & {C}) sent8: ¬{CO} -> ¬(¬{CT} & {IN}) sent9: ¬(¬{BG} & {DG}) sent10: ¬{FB} sent11: (¬{AJ} & ¬{FK}) sent12: ¬{AE} sent13: {A} -> (¬{DO} & ¬{GR}) sent14: ¬{HR} sent15: ¬({AA} & {AB}) sent16: {A} -> ¬(¬{B} & ¬{C}) sent17: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} sent18: (¬{EA} & ¬{BR}) sent19: ¬({FS} & ¬{HQ}) sent20: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) sent21: ¬{AP} -> ¬{HQ} | [
"sent20 & sent6 -> int1: the fact that not the belay but the abrasion occurs is incorrect.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the progressive does not occur.; sent2 & sent3 -> int3: the centrifugalness does not occur.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent20 & sent6 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}); int1 & sent17 -> int2: ¬{B}; sent2 & sent3 -> int3: ¬{C}; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 3 | 3 | 16 | 0 | 16 | the fact that the progressiveness does not occur and the centrifugalness does not occur is incorrect. | ¬(¬{B} & ¬{C}) | 7 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the non-progressiveness and the non-centrifugalness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the singing animator does not occur then the fact that the singing basil does not occur and the quantitativeness does not occur is not correct. sent2: if the fact that the centrifugalness and the non-quantitativeness happens does not hold then the centrifugalness does not occur. sent3: that the fact that the centrifugalness occurs but the quantitativeness does not occur does not hold hold. sent4: if the singing basil does not occur the fact that the belay occurs and the abrasion happens is wrong. sent5: that the progressiveness does not occur is triggered by that the belay happens. sent6: the singing basil does not occur. sent7: both the non-progressiveness and the centrifugalness happens if the singing animator happens. sent8: that the fact that not the crackle but the plain occurs is wrong is not incorrect if the amnestying does not occur. sent9: the fact that the vigilantism does not occur but the condescension occurs is false. sent10: the heraldicness does not occur. sent11: the Samoan does not occur and the hiring does not occur. sent12: the restriction does not occur. sent13: the singing basil triggers that the furling epigone does not occur and the raylessness does not occur. sent14: the resoluteness does not occur. sent15: that the belaying and the abrasion occurs is wrong. sent16: that the progressiveness does not occur and the centrifugalness does not occur is not right if the fact that the singing basil occurs is correct. sent17: the progressive does not occur if the fact that the belaying does not occur and the abrasion occurs is not true. sent18: the crying does not occur and the predation does not occur. sent19: the fact that the furling stirk happens but the singing absentee does not occur is wrong. sent20: the fact that not the belaying but the abrasion occurs is not right if the singing basil does not occur. sent21: that the singing absentee does not occur hold if the overpressure does not occur. ; $proof$ = | sent20 & sent6 -> int1: the fact that not the belay but the abrasion occurs is incorrect.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the progressive does not occur.; sent2 & sent3 -> int3: the centrifugalness does not occur.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the fact that not the belaying but the abrasion occurs is not right if the singing basil does not occur. | [
"the singing basil does not occur.",
"the progressive does not occur if the fact that the belaying does not occur and the abrasion occurs is not true.",
"if the fact that the centrifugalness and the non-quantitativeness happens does not hold then the centrifugalness does not occur.",
"that the fact that the centrifugalness occurs but the quantitativeness does not occur does not hold hold."
] | [
"If the singing basil does not occur, the fact that not the belaying but the abrasion occurs is not right.",
"If the singing basil does not occur, then the fact that not the belaying but the abrasion occurs is not right.",
"If the singing basil does not happen, the fact that not the belaying but the abrasion occurs is not right.",
"If singing basil does not occur, the fact that not the belaying but the abrasion occurs is not right."
] | If singing basil does not occur, the fact that not the belaying but the abrasion occurs is not right. | that the fact that the centrifugalness occurs but the quantitativeness does not occur does not hold hold. |
the fact that that the khanate happens and the unhelpfulness occurs is not incorrect is not correct. | sent1: if the calyptrateness does not occur both the unhelpfulness and the indentation happens. sent2: if the indentation does not occur then both the unhelpfulness and the singing forge happens. sent3: the fact that the sass does not occur but the nonsteroidalness occurs does not hold if the singing forge does not occur. sent4: the irregular does not occur if that that not the singing actor but the eschatologicalness happens is not incorrect is false. sent5: the singing forge happens. sent6: the khanate occurs if the unhelpfulness occurs. sent7: that not the singing ACLANT but the atonalness happens results in that the calyptrateness does not occur. sent8: the fact that the singing actor does not occur but the eschatologicalness happens is not true if the singing forge occurs. | ¬({C} & {D}) | sent1: ¬{F} -> ({D} & {E}) sent2: ¬{E} -> ({D} & {A}) sent3: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{HU} & {IJ}) sent4: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} sent5: {A} sent6: {D} -> {C} sent7: (¬{H} & {G}) -> ¬{F} sent8: {A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) | [
"sent8 & sent5 -> int1: that not the singing actor but the eschatologicalness occurs is not correct.; sent4 & int1 -> int2: the irregularness does not occur.;"
] | UNKNOWN | [
"sent8 & sent5 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}); sent4 & int1 -> int2: ¬{B};"
] | UNKNOWN | 3 | null | 5 | 0 | 5 | the khanate and the unhelpfulness occurs. | ({C} & {D}) | 5 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that that the khanate happens and the unhelpfulness occurs is not incorrect is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the calyptrateness does not occur both the unhelpfulness and the indentation happens. sent2: if the indentation does not occur then both the unhelpfulness and the singing forge happens. sent3: the fact that the sass does not occur but the nonsteroidalness occurs does not hold if the singing forge does not occur. sent4: the irregular does not occur if that that not the singing actor but the eschatologicalness happens is not incorrect is false. sent5: the singing forge happens. sent6: the khanate occurs if the unhelpfulness occurs. sent7: that not the singing ACLANT but the atonalness happens results in that the calyptrateness does not occur. sent8: the fact that the singing actor does not occur but the eschatologicalness happens is not true if the singing forge occurs. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | the fact that the singing actor does not occur but the eschatologicalness happens is not true if the singing forge occurs. | [
"the singing forge happens.",
"the irregular does not occur if that that not the singing actor but the eschatologicalness happens is not incorrect is false."
] | [
"If the singing forge occurs, the fact that the singing actor does not occur is not true.",
"The fact that the singing actor doesn't happen is not true if the singing forge happens."
] | If the singing forge occurs, the fact that the singing actor does not occur is not true. | the singing forge happens. |
the fact that that the khanate happens and the unhelpfulness occurs is not incorrect is not correct. | sent1: if the calyptrateness does not occur both the unhelpfulness and the indentation happens. sent2: if the indentation does not occur then both the unhelpfulness and the singing forge happens. sent3: the fact that the sass does not occur but the nonsteroidalness occurs does not hold if the singing forge does not occur. sent4: the irregular does not occur if that that not the singing actor but the eschatologicalness happens is not incorrect is false. sent5: the singing forge happens. sent6: the khanate occurs if the unhelpfulness occurs. sent7: that not the singing ACLANT but the atonalness happens results in that the calyptrateness does not occur. sent8: the fact that the singing actor does not occur but the eschatologicalness happens is not true if the singing forge occurs. | ¬({C} & {D}) | sent1: ¬{F} -> ({D} & {E}) sent2: ¬{E} -> ({D} & {A}) sent3: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{HU} & {IJ}) sent4: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} sent5: {A} sent6: {D} -> {C} sent7: (¬{H} & {G}) -> ¬{F} sent8: {A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) | [
"sent8 & sent5 -> int1: that not the singing actor but the eschatologicalness occurs is not correct.; sent4 & int1 -> int2: the irregularness does not occur.;"
] | UNKNOWN | [
"sent8 & sent5 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}); sent4 & int1 -> int2: ¬{B};"
] | UNKNOWN | 3 | null | 5 | 0 | 5 | the khanate and the unhelpfulness occurs. | ({C} & {D}) | 5 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that that the khanate happens and the unhelpfulness occurs is not incorrect is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the calyptrateness does not occur both the unhelpfulness and the indentation happens. sent2: if the indentation does not occur then both the unhelpfulness and the singing forge happens. sent3: the fact that the sass does not occur but the nonsteroidalness occurs does not hold if the singing forge does not occur. sent4: the irregular does not occur if that that not the singing actor but the eschatologicalness happens is not incorrect is false. sent5: the singing forge happens. sent6: the khanate occurs if the unhelpfulness occurs. sent7: that not the singing ACLANT but the atonalness happens results in that the calyptrateness does not occur. sent8: the fact that the singing actor does not occur but the eschatologicalness happens is not true if the singing forge occurs. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | the fact that the singing actor does not occur but the eschatologicalness happens is not true if the singing forge occurs. | [
"the singing forge happens.",
"the irregular does not occur if that that not the singing actor but the eschatologicalness happens is not incorrect is false."
] | [
"If the singing forge occurs, the fact that the singing actor does not occur is not true.",
"The fact that the singing actor doesn't happen is not true if the singing forge happens."
] | The fact that the singing actor doesn't happen is not true if the singing forge happens. | the irregular does not occur if that that not the singing actor but the eschatologicalness happens is not incorrect is false. |
the fact that that the manganese is not a kind of a deerskin but it is a kind of a wild is not correct is right if the chick is a Kurdistan. | sent1: the Burr is a kind of a boomerang. sent2: the fact that the manganese is not a wild but it is a kind of a boomerang is not true if the chick is a kind of a deerskin. sent3: that the chick is not a nosedive but it is meteoric is false. sent4: that the manganese is a deerskin that is wild is not right if the chick boomerangs. sent5: the manganese is a wild if it is a kind of a Kurdistan. sent6: the thimerosal is a wild. sent7: the manganese is not a kind of a deerskin and is a kind of a wild if the chick is a kind of a Kurdistan. sent8: the manganese does boomerang. sent9: that the chick is a deerskin and it is a kind of a wild does not hold if the fact that the manganese does boomerang is not incorrect. sent10: the fact that the manganese is not a deerskin and is a wild hold. sent11: the fact that the manganese is a deerskin that is a wild is wrong. sent12: if the chick is a kind of a boomerang then the fact that the manganese is not a deerskin but it is wild is incorrect. sent13: the fact that the chick is not a deerskin but it boomerangs does not hold. sent14: if the manganese is a deerskin then the chick is not a boomerang and is wild. sent15: the manganese is both not a deerskin and a wild if the chick is a boomerang. sent16: the fact that the chick is normative and a deerskin is not true. sent17: if the chick is a Kurdistan the fact that the manganese is a kind of a deerskin that is a kind of a wild is incorrect. sent18: something that is not a deerskin is a kind of a boomerang and is a Kurdistan. sent19: the fact that the chick unfastens quartering hold. | {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{D}{b} & {C}{b}) | sent1: {B}{fo} sent2: {D}{a} -> ¬(¬{C}{b} & {B}{b}) sent3: ¬(¬{CM}{a} & {IC}{a}) sent4: {B}{a} -> ¬({D}{b} & {C}{b}) sent5: {A}{b} -> {C}{b} sent6: {C}{je} sent7: {A}{a} -> (¬{D}{b} & {C}{b}) sent8: {B}{b} sent9: {B}{b} -> ¬({D}{a} & {C}{a}) sent10: (¬{D}{b} & {C}{b}) sent11: ¬({D}{b} & {C}{b}) sent12: {B}{a} -> ¬(¬{D}{b} & {C}{b}) sent13: ¬(¬{D}{a} & {B}{a}) sent14: {D}{b} -> (¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}) sent15: {B}{a} -> (¬{D}{b} & {C}{b}) sent16: ¬({F}{a} & {D}{a}) sent17: {A}{a} -> ¬({D}{b} & {C}{b}) sent18: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({B}x & {A}x) sent19: {GT}{a} | [] | UNKNOWN | [] | UNKNOWN | 3 | null | 18 | 0 | 18 | the sassaby is wild. | {C}{dl} | 5 | [
"sent18 -> int1: if the sassaby is not a deerskin it is a boomerang that is a kind of a Kurdistan.; sent16 -> int2: there is something such that that it is normative and it is a deerskin is incorrect.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that that the manganese is not a kind of a deerskin but it is a kind of a wild is not correct is right if the chick is a Kurdistan. ; $context$ = sent1: the Burr is a kind of a boomerang. sent2: the fact that the manganese is not a wild but it is a kind of a boomerang is not true if the chick is a kind of a deerskin. sent3: that the chick is not a nosedive but it is meteoric is false. sent4: that the manganese is a deerskin that is wild is not right if the chick boomerangs. sent5: the manganese is a wild if it is a kind of a Kurdistan. sent6: the thimerosal is a wild. sent7: the manganese is not a kind of a deerskin and is a kind of a wild if the chick is a kind of a Kurdistan. sent8: the manganese does boomerang. sent9: that the chick is a deerskin and it is a kind of a wild does not hold if the fact that the manganese does boomerang is not incorrect. sent10: the fact that the manganese is not a deerskin and is a wild hold. sent11: the fact that the manganese is a deerskin that is a wild is wrong. sent12: if the chick is a kind of a boomerang then the fact that the manganese is not a deerskin but it is wild is incorrect. sent13: the fact that the chick is not a deerskin but it boomerangs does not hold. sent14: if the manganese is a deerskin then the chick is not a boomerang and is wild. sent15: the manganese is both not a deerskin and a wild if the chick is a boomerang. sent16: the fact that the chick is normative and a deerskin is not true. sent17: if the chick is a Kurdistan the fact that the manganese is a kind of a deerskin that is a kind of a wild is incorrect. sent18: something that is not a deerskin is a kind of a boomerang and is a Kurdistan. sent19: the fact that the chick unfastens quartering hold. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | if the manganese is a deerskin then the chick is not a boomerang and is wild. | [
"if the chick is a kind of a boomerang then the fact that the manganese is not a deerskin but it is wild is incorrect."
] | [
"if the manganese is a deerskin then the chick is not a boomerang and is wild."
] | if the manganese is a deerskin then the chick is not a boomerang and is wild. | if the chick is a kind of a boomerang then the fact that the manganese is not a deerskin but it is wild is incorrect. |
the ER cogitates. | sent1: if something is not a kind of a Philistine but it is a kind of a stogy the individualist is not artiodactyl. sent2: the matelote is not orthodontic. sent3: if the seamount does not cogitate and does undervalue the ER does not cogitate. sent4: the fact that something is not a repellent and does cogitate does not hold if the fact that it is not existentialist is true. sent5: if the individualist is not photochemical it does sing fellowship and is a volvulus. sent6: the ER does cogitate if it is a repellent and it is not homonymic. sent7: something is not alkaline and it is not croupy if it is not artiodactyl. sent8: the seamount undervalues if the fact that the captain is orthodontic hold. sent9: if something is a existentialist the fact that it is both not a repellent and not homonymic is not correct. sent10: the seamount does not cogitate if the ER is brassy. sent11: the individualist is not photochemical if it is both non-alkaline and non-croupy. sent12: if there is something such that it is not orthodontic the captain is a volvulus. sent13: something is orthodontic if it is not corrigible. sent14: if the captain is irreparable then the fact that it is both a transport and not incorrigible is not true. sent15: there exists something such that it is a kind of non-Philistine thing that is a stogy. sent16: if there is something such that it is a kind of a volvulus the seamount is a kind of a existentialist. sent17: if the ER does not undervalue then it is a repellent and it is not homonymic. sent18: if the fact that the captain is a kind of a transport but it is not incorrigible does not hold that it is incorrigible is not incorrect. sent19: the fact that the seamount does transport and is not homonymic is false if that the ER undervalues is true. sent20: the fact that the ER does not undervalue if the fact that the seamount is a Picasso but it is not brassy is not right is correct. sent21: if the fact that the individualist is both not a volvulus and existentialist does not hold then the ER is not a existentialist. | {D}{b} | sent1: (x): (¬{O}x & {N}x) -> ¬{M}{c} sent2: ¬{G}{e} sent3: (¬{D}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{D}{b} sent4: (x): ¬{E}x -> ¬(¬{C}x & {D}x) sent5: ¬{I}{c} -> ({H}{c} & {F}{c}) sent6: ({C}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) -> {D}{b} sent7: (x): ¬{M}x -> (¬{K}x & ¬{L}x) sent8: {G}{d} -> {B}{a} sent9: (x): {E}x -> ¬(¬{C}x & ¬{A}x) sent10: {AB}{b} -> ¬{D}{a} sent11: (¬{K}{c} & ¬{L}{c}) -> ¬{I}{c} sent12: (x): ¬{G}x -> {F}{d} sent13: (x): {J}x -> {G}x sent14: ¬{P}{d} -> ¬({Q}{d} & ¬{J}{d}) sent15: (Ex): (¬{O}x & {N}x) sent16: (x): {F}x -> {E}{a} sent17: ¬{B}{b} -> ({C}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) sent18: ¬({Q}{d} & ¬{J}{d}) -> {J}{d} sent19: {B}{b} -> ¬({Q}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) sent20: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} sent21: ¬(¬{F}{c} & {E}{c}) -> ¬{E}{b} | [] | UNKNOWN | [] | UNKNOWN | 3 | null | 18 | 0 | 18 | the fact that the fact that the seamount transports but it is not homonymic is right is not true. | ¬({Q}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) | 8 | [
"sent4 -> int1: if the ER is not a kind of a existentialist the fact that it is not a kind of a repellent and it does cogitate is incorrect.; sent2 -> int2: something is not orthodontic.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the captain is a volvulus.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that it is a volvulus.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the ER cogitates. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a kind of a Philistine but it is a kind of a stogy the individualist is not artiodactyl. sent2: the matelote is not orthodontic. sent3: if the seamount does not cogitate and does undervalue the ER does not cogitate. sent4: the fact that something is not a repellent and does cogitate does not hold if the fact that it is not existentialist is true. sent5: if the individualist is not photochemical it does sing fellowship and is a volvulus. sent6: the ER does cogitate if it is a repellent and it is not homonymic. sent7: something is not alkaline and it is not croupy if it is not artiodactyl. sent8: the seamount undervalues if the fact that the captain is orthodontic hold. sent9: if something is a existentialist the fact that it is both not a repellent and not homonymic is not correct. sent10: the seamount does not cogitate if the ER is brassy. sent11: the individualist is not photochemical if it is both non-alkaline and non-croupy. sent12: if there is something such that it is not orthodontic the captain is a volvulus. sent13: something is orthodontic if it is not corrigible. sent14: if the captain is irreparable then the fact that it is both a transport and not incorrigible is not true. sent15: there exists something such that it is a kind of non-Philistine thing that is a stogy. sent16: if there is something such that it is a kind of a volvulus the seamount is a kind of a existentialist. sent17: if the ER does not undervalue then it is a repellent and it is not homonymic. sent18: if the fact that the captain is a kind of a transport but it is not incorrigible does not hold that it is incorrigible is not incorrect. sent19: the fact that the seamount does transport and is not homonymic is false if that the ER undervalues is true. sent20: the fact that the ER does not undervalue if the fact that the seamount is a Picasso but it is not brassy is not right is correct. sent21: if the fact that the individualist is both not a volvulus and existentialist does not hold then the ER is not a existentialist. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | something is not alkaline and it is not croupy if it is not artiodactyl. | [
"if there is something such that it is not orthodontic the captain is a volvulus."
] | [
"something is not alkaline and it is not croupy if it is not artiodactyl."
] | something is not alkaline and it is not croupy if it is not artiodactyl. | if there is something such that it is not orthodontic the captain is a volvulus. |
the detumescence is a Ledum. | sent1: the morula does not sing hogshead. sent2: if something does not sing hogshead it is valedictory. sent3: something is not a kind of a Ledum if it does not sing hogshead and is valedictory. sent4: if something is not valedictory then the fact that it is an attraction is not false. sent5: The hogshead does not sing morula. | {A}{a} | sent1: ¬{B}{aa} sent2: (x): ¬{B}x -> {C}x sent3: (x): (¬{B}x & {C}x) -> ¬{A}x sent4: (x): ¬{C}x -> {AS}x sent5: ¬{AA}{ab} | [
"sent2 -> int1: that the morula is valedictory if the morula does not sing hogshead is right.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the morula is valedictory.;"
] | UNKNOWN | [
"sent2 -> int1: ¬{B}{aa} -> {C}{aa}; int1 & sent1 -> int2: {C}{aa};"
] | UNKNOWN | 3 | null | 3 | 0 | 3 | that the detumescence is not a Ledum is not wrong. | ¬{A}{a} | 5 | [
"sent3 -> int3: the detumescence is not a Ledum if it does not sing hogshead and it is valedictory.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the detumescence is a Ledum. ; $context$ = sent1: the morula does not sing hogshead. sent2: if something does not sing hogshead it is valedictory. sent3: something is not a kind of a Ledum if it does not sing hogshead and is valedictory. sent4: if something is not valedictory then the fact that it is an attraction is not false. sent5: The hogshead does not sing morula. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | if something does not sing hogshead it is valedictory. | [
"the morula does not sing hogshead."
] | [
"if something does not sing hogshead it is valedictory."
] | if something does not sing hogshead it is valedictory. | the morula does not sing hogshead. |
the Altaic is a kind of a sediment. | sent1: the Altaic is a macho. sent2: something is a kind of a Ranger but it does not sing holotype if that it discriminates is correct. sent3: the toddy is a cameo. sent4: if the toddy is both not a sediment and a felloe the Altaic is a cameo. sent5: the Jesuit is a Cam if something that does unfasten metropolitan scythes psychopharmacology. sent6: the toddy is not a felloe. sent7: the Altaic is a felloe. sent8: that something is not a cameo or it is not a felloe or both is wrong if it does not sing holotype. sent9: the Turk's-cap does not discriminate if either it is a kind of a seasnail or it does infuse or both. sent10: either the Turk's-cap is a kind of a seasnail or it infuses or both if there exists something such that it is assertive. sent11: if the stall does not furl animalcule and scythes psychopharmacology the Altaic does scythes psychopharmacology. sent12: there is something such that it scythes psychopharmacology. sent13: if that something is not a cameo or it is not a felloe or both is wrong it is not a kind of a sediment. sent14: if the Turk's-cap does not discriminate and it is not an illumination then the toddy is not discriminate. sent15: if the loophole is not a snare and it is not an illumination the Turk's-cap is not an illumination. sent16: the stall does not furl animalcule and scythes psychopharmacology. sent17: the Altaic unfastens metropolitan. sent18: if the toddy is a Ranger but it does not sing holotype then that the Jesuit does not sing holotype is correct. sent19: the 1-dodecanol is a sediment. sent20: if the toddy is not a kind of a felloe and is a cameo then the Altaic is a sediment. sent21: the muslin is assertive. | {C}{b} | sent1: {IR}{b} sent2: (x): {G}x -> ({H}x & ¬{F}x) sent3: {B}{a} sent4: (¬{C}{a} & {A}{a}) -> {B}{b} sent5: (x): ({D}x & {E}x) -> {GK}{hh} sent6: ¬{A}{a} sent7: {A}{b} sent8: (x): ¬{F}x -> ¬(¬{B}x v ¬{A}x) sent9: ({K}{c} v {J}{c}) -> ¬{G}{c} sent10: (x): {L}x -> ({K}{c} v {J}{c}) sent11: (¬{O}{f} & {E}{f}) -> {E}{b} sent12: (Ex): {E}x sent13: (x): ¬(¬{B}x v ¬{A}x) -> ¬{C}x sent14: (¬{G}{c} & ¬{I}{c}) -> {G}{a} sent15: (¬{N}{e} & ¬{I}{e}) -> ¬{I}{c} sent16: (¬{O}{f} & {E}{f}) sent17: {D}{b} sent18: ({H}{a} & ¬{F}{a}) -> ¬{F}{hh} sent19: {C}{gd} sent20: (¬{A}{a} & {B}{a}) -> {C}{b} sent21: {L}{d} | [
"sent6 & sent3 -> int1: the toddy is not a kind of a felloe and is a cameo.; sent20 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent6 & sent3 -> int1: (¬{A}{a} & {B}{a}); sent20 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 2 | 2 | 18 | 0 | 18 | the Altaic is not a kind of a sediment. | ¬{C}{b} | 6 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the Altaic is a kind of a sediment. ; $context$ = sent1: the Altaic is a macho. sent2: something is a kind of a Ranger but it does not sing holotype if that it discriminates is correct. sent3: the toddy is a cameo. sent4: if the toddy is both not a sediment and a felloe the Altaic is a cameo. sent5: the Jesuit is a Cam if something that does unfasten metropolitan scythes psychopharmacology. sent6: the toddy is not a felloe. sent7: the Altaic is a felloe. sent8: that something is not a cameo or it is not a felloe or both is wrong if it does not sing holotype. sent9: the Turk's-cap does not discriminate if either it is a kind of a seasnail or it does infuse or both. sent10: either the Turk's-cap is a kind of a seasnail or it infuses or both if there exists something such that it is assertive. sent11: if the stall does not furl animalcule and scythes psychopharmacology the Altaic does scythes psychopharmacology. sent12: there is something such that it scythes psychopharmacology. sent13: if that something is not a cameo or it is not a felloe or both is wrong it is not a kind of a sediment. sent14: if the Turk's-cap does not discriminate and it is not an illumination then the toddy is not discriminate. sent15: if the loophole is not a snare and it is not an illumination the Turk's-cap is not an illumination. sent16: the stall does not furl animalcule and scythes psychopharmacology. sent17: the Altaic unfastens metropolitan. sent18: if the toddy is a Ranger but it does not sing holotype then that the Jesuit does not sing holotype is correct. sent19: the 1-dodecanol is a sediment. sent20: if the toddy is not a kind of a felloe and is a cameo then the Altaic is a sediment. sent21: the muslin is assertive. ; $proof$ = | sent6 & sent3 -> int1: the toddy is not a kind of a felloe and is a cameo.; sent20 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the toddy is not a felloe. | [
"the toddy is a cameo.",
"if the toddy is not a kind of a felloe and is a cameo then the Altaic is a sediment."
] | [
"The toddy isn't a felloe.",
"The toddy is not a felloe."
] | The toddy isn't a felloe. | the toddy is a cameo. |
the Altaic is a kind of a sediment. | sent1: the Altaic is a macho. sent2: something is a kind of a Ranger but it does not sing holotype if that it discriminates is correct. sent3: the toddy is a cameo. sent4: if the toddy is both not a sediment and a felloe the Altaic is a cameo. sent5: the Jesuit is a Cam if something that does unfasten metropolitan scythes psychopharmacology. sent6: the toddy is not a felloe. sent7: the Altaic is a felloe. sent8: that something is not a cameo or it is not a felloe or both is wrong if it does not sing holotype. sent9: the Turk's-cap does not discriminate if either it is a kind of a seasnail or it does infuse or both. sent10: either the Turk's-cap is a kind of a seasnail or it infuses or both if there exists something such that it is assertive. sent11: if the stall does not furl animalcule and scythes psychopharmacology the Altaic does scythes psychopharmacology. sent12: there is something such that it scythes psychopharmacology. sent13: if that something is not a cameo or it is not a felloe or both is wrong it is not a kind of a sediment. sent14: if the Turk's-cap does not discriminate and it is not an illumination then the toddy is not discriminate. sent15: if the loophole is not a snare and it is not an illumination the Turk's-cap is not an illumination. sent16: the stall does not furl animalcule and scythes psychopharmacology. sent17: the Altaic unfastens metropolitan. sent18: if the toddy is a Ranger but it does not sing holotype then that the Jesuit does not sing holotype is correct. sent19: the 1-dodecanol is a sediment. sent20: if the toddy is not a kind of a felloe and is a cameo then the Altaic is a sediment. sent21: the muslin is assertive. | {C}{b} | sent1: {IR}{b} sent2: (x): {G}x -> ({H}x & ¬{F}x) sent3: {B}{a} sent4: (¬{C}{a} & {A}{a}) -> {B}{b} sent5: (x): ({D}x & {E}x) -> {GK}{hh} sent6: ¬{A}{a} sent7: {A}{b} sent8: (x): ¬{F}x -> ¬(¬{B}x v ¬{A}x) sent9: ({K}{c} v {J}{c}) -> ¬{G}{c} sent10: (x): {L}x -> ({K}{c} v {J}{c}) sent11: (¬{O}{f} & {E}{f}) -> {E}{b} sent12: (Ex): {E}x sent13: (x): ¬(¬{B}x v ¬{A}x) -> ¬{C}x sent14: (¬{G}{c} & ¬{I}{c}) -> {G}{a} sent15: (¬{N}{e} & ¬{I}{e}) -> ¬{I}{c} sent16: (¬{O}{f} & {E}{f}) sent17: {D}{b} sent18: ({H}{a} & ¬{F}{a}) -> ¬{F}{hh} sent19: {C}{gd} sent20: (¬{A}{a} & {B}{a}) -> {C}{b} sent21: {L}{d} | [
"sent6 & sent3 -> int1: the toddy is not a kind of a felloe and is a cameo.; sent20 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent6 & sent3 -> int1: (¬{A}{a} & {B}{a}); sent20 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 2 | 2 | 18 | 0 | 18 | the Altaic is not a kind of a sediment. | ¬{C}{b} | 6 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the Altaic is a kind of a sediment. ; $context$ = sent1: the Altaic is a macho. sent2: something is a kind of a Ranger but it does not sing holotype if that it discriminates is correct. sent3: the toddy is a cameo. sent4: if the toddy is both not a sediment and a felloe the Altaic is a cameo. sent5: the Jesuit is a Cam if something that does unfasten metropolitan scythes psychopharmacology. sent6: the toddy is not a felloe. sent7: the Altaic is a felloe. sent8: that something is not a cameo or it is not a felloe or both is wrong if it does not sing holotype. sent9: the Turk's-cap does not discriminate if either it is a kind of a seasnail or it does infuse or both. sent10: either the Turk's-cap is a kind of a seasnail or it infuses or both if there exists something such that it is assertive. sent11: if the stall does not furl animalcule and scythes psychopharmacology the Altaic does scythes psychopharmacology. sent12: there is something such that it scythes psychopharmacology. sent13: if that something is not a cameo or it is not a felloe or both is wrong it is not a kind of a sediment. sent14: if the Turk's-cap does not discriminate and it is not an illumination then the toddy is not discriminate. sent15: if the loophole is not a snare and it is not an illumination the Turk's-cap is not an illumination. sent16: the stall does not furl animalcule and scythes psychopharmacology. sent17: the Altaic unfastens metropolitan. sent18: if the toddy is a Ranger but it does not sing holotype then that the Jesuit does not sing holotype is correct. sent19: the 1-dodecanol is a sediment. sent20: if the toddy is not a kind of a felloe and is a cameo then the Altaic is a sediment. sent21: the muslin is assertive. ; $proof$ = | sent6 & sent3 -> int1: the toddy is not a kind of a felloe and is a cameo.; sent20 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the toddy is not a felloe. | [
"the toddy is a cameo.",
"if the toddy is not a kind of a felloe and is a cameo then the Altaic is a sediment."
] | [
"The toddy isn't a felloe.",
"The toddy is not a felloe."
] | The toddy is not a felloe. | if the toddy is not a kind of a felloe and is a cameo then the Altaic is a sediment. |
the rotationalness does not occur and the furling Wyrd does not occur. | sent1: the furling Procellariidae does not occur. sent2: if the interreflection does not occur then the onomasticsness does not occur. sent3: the rotationalness does not occur and the furling Wyrd does not occur if the imperial does not occur. sent4: the interreflection does not occur. sent5: that the trip does not occur is not wrong. sent6: that both the non-metallurgicalness and the non-lowbornness happens is triggered by the non-anterogradeness. sent7: the lexicostatisticness does not occur and the twenty-one does not occur. sent8: the tutorialness does not occur and the provisioning does not occur. sent9: the oversimplification does not occur and the equilibration does not occur. sent10: the fact that the bed-hopping does not occur and the erasure does not occur is not wrong. sent11: if the imperial happens the unfastening Seattle does not occur and the nonreflectiveness does not occur. sent12: the bicker does not occur if the plebiscite does not occur. sent13: the presentness does not occur. sent14: the non-nonreflectiveness and the non-imperialness happens. sent15: the stomping does not occur if the fueling does not occur. sent16: if the imperialness does not occur then the furling Wyrd does not occur. sent17: the unfastening Nina does not occur. sent18: the non-backingness is caused by that the jazz does not occur. sent19: the profligacy does not occur. sent20: that the furling credulousness does not occur hold. | (¬{C} & ¬{D}) | sent1: ¬{CD} sent2: ¬{DH} -> ¬{CU} sent3: ¬{B} -> (¬{C} & ¬{D}) sent4: ¬{DH} sent5: ¬{FA} sent6: ¬{FM} -> (¬{ID} & ¬{O}) sent7: (¬{ES} & ¬{FP}) sent8: (¬{FL} & ¬{AT}) sent9: (¬{T} & ¬{DN}) sent10: (¬{IP} & ¬{EJ}) sent11: {B} -> (¬{AF} & ¬{A}) sent12: ¬{BM} -> ¬{F} sent13: ¬{BN} sent14: (¬{A} & ¬{B}) sent15: ¬{DE} -> ¬{IB} sent16: ¬{B} -> ¬{D} sent17: ¬{HP} sent18: ¬{BJ} -> ¬{JK} sent19: ¬{GP} sent20: ¬{GJ} | [
"sent14 -> int1: the imperial does not occur.; sent3 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent14 -> int1: ¬{B}; sent3 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 2 | 2 | 18 | 0 | 18 | the unfastening Seattle does not occur. | ¬{AF} | 6 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the rotationalness does not occur and the furling Wyrd does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the furling Procellariidae does not occur. sent2: if the interreflection does not occur then the onomasticsness does not occur. sent3: the rotationalness does not occur and the furling Wyrd does not occur if the imperial does not occur. sent4: the interreflection does not occur. sent5: that the trip does not occur is not wrong. sent6: that both the non-metallurgicalness and the non-lowbornness happens is triggered by the non-anterogradeness. sent7: the lexicostatisticness does not occur and the twenty-one does not occur. sent8: the tutorialness does not occur and the provisioning does not occur. sent9: the oversimplification does not occur and the equilibration does not occur. sent10: the fact that the bed-hopping does not occur and the erasure does not occur is not wrong. sent11: if the imperial happens the unfastening Seattle does not occur and the nonreflectiveness does not occur. sent12: the bicker does not occur if the plebiscite does not occur. sent13: the presentness does not occur. sent14: the non-nonreflectiveness and the non-imperialness happens. sent15: the stomping does not occur if the fueling does not occur. sent16: if the imperialness does not occur then the furling Wyrd does not occur. sent17: the unfastening Nina does not occur. sent18: the non-backingness is caused by that the jazz does not occur. sent19: the profligacy does not occur. sent20: that the furling credulousness does not occur hold. ; $proof$ = | sent14 -> int1: the imperial does not occur.; sent3 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the non-nonreflectiveness and the non-imperialness happens. | [
"the rotationalness does not occur and the furling Wyrd does not occur if the imperial does not occur."
] | [
"the non-nonreflectiveness and the non-imperialness happens."
] | the non-nonreflectiveness and the non-imperialness happens. | the rotationalness does not occur and the furling Wyrd does not occur if the imperial does not occur. |
the antiemetic is a kind of a shift. | sent1: if that something is not a telescopy but arteriolar is not right then it is not a kind of a shift. sent2: if the fact that the antiemetic is not arteriolar and is not a shift is not correct it is not a telescopy. sent3: the roundel is a telescopy if there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it is a kind of non-apicultural thing that furls fresco hold is false. sent4: if the roundel is a kind of a telescopy the antiemetic is a kind of a shift. sent5: the fact that something is not a kind of a telescopy but it is arteriolar does not hold if it is not supraorbital. sent6: the antiemetic is a wheeler if the fact that that the roundel does not furl imperiousness but it is a kind of a wheeler is not wrong is false. sent7: there exists something such that the fact that it is not apicultural and it furls fresco is not correct. sent8: the fact that if the roundel is not the venture the fact that the roundel does not furl imperiousness but it is a wheeler is not true is true. sent9: something is not supraorbital and it does not tone if the fact that it is a kind of a wheeler is not incorrect. | {B}{b} | sent1: (x): ¬(¬{A}x & {C}x) -> ¬{B}x sent2: ¬(¬{C}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) -> ¬{A}{b} sent3: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {A}{a} sent4: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} sent5: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & {C}x) sent6: ¬(¬{G}{a} & {F}{a}) -> {F}{b} sent7: (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent8: ¬{H}{a} -> ¬(¬{G}{a} & {F}{a}) sent9: (x): {F}x -> (¬{D}x & ¬{E}x) | [
"sent7 & sent3 -> int1: the fact that the roundel is a telescopy is not false.; sent4 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent7 & sent3 -> int1: {A}{a}; sent4 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 2 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 6 | there is something such that that it does not sing berserker and it sings cease does not hold. | (Ex): ¬(¬{CB}x & {CH}x) | 6 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the antiemetic is a kind of a shift. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something is not a telescopy but arteriolar is not right then it is not a kind of a shift. sent2: if the fact that the antiemetic is not arteriolar and is not a shift is not correct it is not a telescopy. sent3: the roundel is a telescopy if there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it is a kind of non-apicultural thing that furls fresco hold is false. sent4: if the roundel is a kind of a telescopy the antiemetic is a kind of a shift. sent5: the fact that something is not a kind of a telescopy but it is arteriolar does not hold if it is not supraorbital. sent6: the antiemetic is a wheeler if the fact that that the roundel does not furl imperiousness but it is a kind of a wheeler is not wrong is false. sent7: there exists something such that the fact that it is not apicultural and it furls fresco is not correct. sent8: the fact that if the roundel is not the venture the fact that the roundel does not furl imperiousness but it is a wheeler is not true is true. sent9: something is not supraorbital and it does not tone if the fact that it is a kind of a wheeler is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = | sent7 & sent3 -> int1: the fact that the roundel is a telescopy is not false.; sent4 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | there exists something such that the fact that it is not apicultural and it furls fresco is not correct. | [
"the roundel is a telescopy if there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it is a kind of non-apicultural thing that furls fresco hold is false.",
"if the roundel is a kind of a telescopy the antiemetic is a kind of a shift."
] | [
"It is not correct that it is not cultural and furls fresco is not.",
"It is not correct that it is not cultural and that it is furls fresco."
] | It is not correct that it is not cultural and furls fresco is not. | the roundel is a telescopy if there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it is a kind of non-apicultural thing that furls fresco hold is false. |
the antiemetic is a kind of a shift. | sent1: if that something is not a telescopy but arteriolar is not right then it is not a kind of a shift. sent2: if the fact that the antiemetic is not arteriolar and is not a shift is not correct it is not a telescopy. sent3: the roundel is a telescopy if there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it is a kind of non-apicultural thing that furls fresco hold is false. sent4: if the roundel is a kind of a telescopy the antiemetic is a kind of a shift. sent5: the fact that something is not a kind of a telescopy but it is arteriolar does not hold if it is not supraorbital. sent6: the antiemetic is a wheeler if the fact that that the roundel does not furl imperiousness but it is a kind of a wheeler is not wrong is false. sent7: there exists something such that the fact that it is not apicultural and it furls fresco is not correct. sent8: the fact that if the roundel is not the venture the fact that the roundel does not furl imperiousness but it is a wheeler is not true is true. sent9: something is not supraorbital and it does not tone if the fact that it is a kind of a wheeler is not incorrect. | {B}{b} | sent1: (x): ¬(¬{A}x & {C}x) -> ¬{B}x sent2: ¬(¬{C}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) -> ¬{A}{b} sent3: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {A}{a} sent4: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} sent5: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & {C}x) sent6: ¬(¬{G}{a} & {F}{a}) -> {F}{b} sent7: (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent8: ¬{H}{a} -> ¬(¬{G}{a} & {F}{a}) sent9: (x): {F}x -> (¬{D}x & ¬{E}x) | [
"sent7 & sent3 -> int1: the fact that the roundel is a telescopy is not false.; sent4 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent7 & sent3 -> int1: {A}{a}; sent4 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 2 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 6 | there is something such that that it does not sing berserker and it sings cease does not hold. | (Ex): ¬(¬{CB}x & {CH}x) | 6 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the antiemetic is a kind of a shift. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something is not a telescopy but arteriolar is not right then it is not a kind of a shift. sent2: if the fact that the antiemetic is not arteriolar and is not a shift is not correct it is not a telescopy. sent3: the roundel is a telescopy if there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it is a kind of non-apicultural thing that furls fresco hold is false. sent4: if the roundel is a kind of a telescopy the antiemetic is a kind of a shift. sent5: the fact that something is not a kind of a telescopy but it is arteriolar does not hold if it is not supraorbital. sent6: the antiemetic is a wheeler if the fact that that the roundel does not furl imperiousness but it is a kind of a wheeler is not wrong is false. sent7: there exists something such that the fact that it is not apicultural and it furls fresco is not correct. sent8: the fact that if the roundel is not the venture the fact that the roundel does not furl imperiousness but it is a wheeler is not true is true. sent9: something is not supraorbital and it does not tone if the fact that it is a kind of a wheeler is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = | sent7 & sent3 -> int1: the fact that the roundel is a telescopy is not false.; sent4 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | there exists something such that the fact that it is not apicultural and it furls fresco is not correct. | [
"the roundel is a telescopy if there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it is a kind of non-apicultural thing that furls fresco hold is false.",
"if the roundel is a kind of a telescopy the antiemetic is a kind of a shift."
] | [
"It is not correct that it is not cultural and furls fresco is not.",
"It is not correct that it is not cultural and that it is furls fresco."
] | It is not correct that it is not cultural and that it is furls fresco. | if the roundel is a kind of a telescopy the antiemetic is a kind of a shift. |
the firecracker does scythe reprobation. | sent1: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a Minuteman then the firecracker does scythe reprobation. sent2: there exists something such that it is careful. sent3: the firecracker scythes reprobation and it is a kind of a Minuteman if there exists something such that it is careful. | {B}{a} | sent1: (x): {C}x -> {B}{a} sent2: (Ex): {A}x sent3: (x): {A}x -> ({B}{a} & {C}{a}) | [
"sent2 & sent3 -> int1: the firecracker does scythe reprobation and it is a Minuteman.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent2 & sent3 -> int1: ({B}{a} & {C}{a}); int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | [] | null | null | $hypothesis$ = the firecracker does scythe reprobation. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a Minuteman then the firecracker does scythe reprobation. sent2: there exists something such that it is careful. sent3: the firecracker scythes reprobation and it is a kind of a Minuteman if there exists something such that it is careful. ; $proof$ = | sent2 & sent3 -> int1: the firecracker does scythe reprobation and it is a Minuteman.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | there exists something such that it is careful. | [
"the firecracker scythes reprobation and it is a kind of a Minuteman if there exists something such that it is careful."
] | [
"there exists something such that it is careful."
] | there exists something such that it is careful. | the firecracker scythes reprobation and it is a kind of a Minuteman if there exists something such that it is careful. |
the accounting does not occur. | sent1: the ribbing happens. sent2: the sociolinguisticsness occurs. sent3: both the cadetship and the furling AUC happens. sent4: if the Zephyr does not occur and the furling abampere does not occur then the accounting occurs. sent5: if the elongation and the encore occurs the logisticness does not occur. sent6: the immolation happens and the fortification happens. sent7: the unfastening mongoose and the trigonometricness happens. sent8: the Mass does not occur. sent9: that the furling abampere occurs and the segregation happens causes that the accounting does not occur. sent10: the backingness occurs. sent11: the furling abampere happens and the Zephyr happens. sent12: if the fact that the Zephyr does not occur hold then the furling abampere occurs and the discoing occurs. sent13: the furling recital occurs. sent14: the segregation happens if the furling recital occurs. sent15: the encore happens. sent16: the bootlegging happens. sent17: if the crutch does not occur then the accounting happens and the furling recital happens. sent18: if the epiphysealness does not occur then the crutch does not occur and the pyemicness does not occur. sent19: the unfastening Shaktist does not occur. sent20: the unfastening juvenile and the lapidating happens. sent21: the singing AUC and the federalization happens. sent22: the Zephyr occurs. sent23: the antagonism and the conjuncture happens. | ¬{D} | sent1: {DE} sent2: {BJ} sent3: ({AB} & {CU}) sent4: (¬{B} & ¬{A}) -> {D} sent5: ({GC} & {IJ}) -> ¬{DL} sent6: ({Q} & {BT}) sent7: ({J} & {IR}) sent8: ¬{EP} sent9: ({A} & {C}) -> ¬{D} sent10: {FB} sent11: ({A} & {B}) sent12: ¬{B} -> ({A} & {EF}) sent13: {E} sent14: {E} -> {C} sent15: {IJ} sent16: {BD} sent17: ¬{F} -> ({D} & {E}) sent18: ¬{H} -> (¬{F} & ¬{G}) sent19: ¬{CM} sent20: ({EE} & {IK}) sent21: ({GM} & {CQ}) sent22: {B} sent23: ({L} & {P}) | [
"sent11 -> int1: the furling abampere happens.; sent14 & sent13 -> int2: that the segregation happens is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the furling abampere happens and the segregation happens.; int3 & sent9 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent11 -> int1: {A}; sent14 & sent13 -> int2: {C}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ({A} & {C}); int3 & sent9 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 3 | 3 | 19 | 0 | 19 | the accounting occurs. | {D} | 5 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the accounting does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the ribbing happens. sent2: the sociolinguisticsness occurs. sent3: both the cadetship and the furling AUC happens. sent4: if the Zephyr does not occur and the furling abampere does not occur then the accounting occurs. sent5: if the elongation and the encore occurs the logisticness does not occur. sent6: the immolation happens and the fortification happens. sent7: the unfastening mongoose and the trigonometricness happens. sent8: the Mass does not occur. sent9: that the furling abampere occurs and the segregation happens causes that the accounting does not occur. sent10: the backingness occurs. sent11: the furling abampere happens and the Zephyr happens. sent12: if the fact that the Zephyr does not occur hold then the furling abampere occurs and the discoing occurs. sent13: the furling recital occurs. sent14: the segregation happens if the furling recital occurs. sent15: the encore happens. sent16: the bootlegging happens. sent17: if the crutch does not occur then the accounting happens and the furling recital happens. sent18: if the epiphysealness does not occur then the crutch does not occur and the pyemicness does not occur. sent19: the unfastening Shaktist does not occur. sent20: the unfastening juvenile and the lapidating happens. sent21: the singing AUC and the federalization happens. sent22: the Zephyr occurs. sent23: the antagonism and the conjuncture happens. ; $proof$ = | sent11 -> int1: the furling abampere happens.; sent14 & sent13 -> int2: that the segregation happens is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the furling abampere happens and the segregation happens.; int3 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the furling abampere happens and the Zephyr happens. | [
"the segregation happens if the furling recital occurs.",
"the furling recital occurs.",
"that the furling abampere occurs and the segregation happens causes that the accounting does not occur."
] | [
"There is a furling and a Zephyr.",
"The furling is followed by the Zephyr.",
"The furling and the Zephyr happen at the same time."
] | There is a furling and a Zephyr. | the segregation happens if the furling recital occurs. |
the accounting does not occur. | sent1: the ribbing happens. sent2: the sociolinguisticsness occurs. sent3: both the cadetship and the furling AUC happens. sent4: if the Zephyr does not occur and the furling abampere does not occur then the accounting occurs. sent5: if the elongation and the encore occurs the logisticness does not occur. sent6: the immolation happens and the fortification happens. sent7: the unfastening mongoose and the trigonometricness happens. sent8: the Mass does not occur. sent9: that the furling abampere occurs and the segregation happens causes that the accounting does not occur. sent10: the backingness occurs. sent11: the furling abampere happens and the Zephyr happens. sent12: if the fact that the Zephyr does not occur hold then the furling abampere occurs and the discoing occurs. sent13: the furling recital occurs. sent14: the segregation happens if the furling recital occurs. sent15: the encore happens. sent16: the bootlegging happens. sent17: if the crutch does not occur then the accounting happens and the furling recital happens. sent18: if the epiphysealness does not occur then the crutch does not occur and the pyemicness does not occur. sent19: the unfastening Shaktist does not occur. sent20: the unfastening juvenile and the lapidating happens. sent21: the singing AUC and the federalization happens. sent22: the Zephyr occurs. sent23: the antagonism and the conjuncture happens. | ¬{D} | sent1: {DE} sent2: {BJ} sent3: ({AB} & {CU}) sent4: (¬{B} & ¬{A}) -> {D} sent5: ({GC} & {IJ}) -> ¬{DL} sent6: ({Q} & {BT}) sent7: ({J} & {IR}) sent8: ¬{EP} sent9: ({A} & {C}) -> ¬{D} sent10: {FB} sent11: ({A} & {B}) sent12: ¬{B} -> ({A} & {EF}) sent13: {E} sent14: {E} -> {C} sent15: {IJ} sent16: {BD} sent17: ¬{F} -> ({D} & {E}) sent18: ¬{H} -> (¬{F} & ¬{G}) sent19: ¬{CM} sent20: ({EE} & {IK}) sent21: ({GM} & {CQ}) sent22: {B} sent23: ({L} & {P}) | [
"sent11 -> int1: the furling abampere happens.; sent14 & sent13 -> int2: that the segregation happens is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the furling abampere happens and the segregation happens.; int3 & sent9 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent11 -> int1: {A}; sent14 & sent13 -> int2: {C}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ({A} & {C}); int3 & sent9 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 3 | 3 | 19 | 0 | 19 | the accounting occurs. | {D} | 5 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the accounting does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the ribbing happens. sent2: the sociolinguisticsness occurs. sent3: both the cadetship and the furling AUC happens. sent4: if the Zephyr does not occur and the furling abampere does not occur then the accounting occurs. sent5: if the elongation and the encore occurs the logisticness does not occur. sent6: the immolation happens and the fortification happens. sent7: the unfastening mongoose and the trigonometricness happens. sent8: the Mass does not occur. sent9: that the furling abampere occurs and the segregation happens causes that the accounting does not occur. sent10: the backingness occurs. sent11: the furling abampere happens and the Zephyr happens. sent12: if the fact that the Zephyr does not occur hold then the furling abampere occurs and the discoing occurs. sent13: the furling recital occurs. sent14: the segregation happens if the furling recital occurs. sent15: the encore happens. sent16: the bootlegging happens. sent17: if the crutch does not occur then the accounting happens and the furling recital happens. sent18: if the epiphysealness does not occur then the crutch does not occur and the pyemicness does not occur. sent19: the unfastening Shaktist does not occur. sent20: the unfastening juvenile and the lapidating happens. sent21: the singing AUC and the federalization happens. sent22: the Zephyr occurs. sent23: the antagonism and the conjuncture happens. ; $proof$ = | sent11 -> int1: the furling abampere happens.; sent14 & sent13 -> int2: that the segregation happens is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the furling abampere happens and the segregation happens.; int3 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the furling abampere happens and the Zephyr happens. | [
"the segregation happens if the furling recital occurs.",
"the furling recital occurs.",
"that the furling abampere occurs and the segregation happens causes that the accounting does not occur."
] | [
"There is a furling and a Zephyr.",
"The furling is followed by the Zephyr.",
"The furling and the Zephyr happen at the same time."
] | The furling is followed by the Zephyr. | the furling recital occurs. |
the accounting does not occur. | sent1: the ribbing happens. sent2: the sociolinguisticsness occurs. sent3: both the cadetship and the furling AUC happens. sent4: if the Zephyr does not occur and the furling abampere does not occur then the accounting occurs. sent5: if the elongation and the encore occurs the logisticness does not occur. sent6: the immolation happens and the fortification happens. sent7: the unfastening mongoose and the trigonometricness happens. sent8: the Mass does not occur. sent9: that the furling abampere occurs and the segregation happens causes that the accounting does not occur. sent10: the backingness occurs. sent11: the furling abampere happens and the Zephyr happens. sent12: if the fact that the Zephyr does not occur hold then the furling abampere occurs and the discoing occurs. sent13: the furling recital occurs. sent14: the segregation happens if the furling recital occurs. sent15: the encore happens. sent16: the bootlegging happens. sent17: if the crutch does not occur then the accounting happens and the furling recital happens. sent18: if the epiphysealness does not occur then the crutch does not occur and the pyemicness does not occur. sent19: the unfastening Shaktist does not occur. sent20: the unfastening juvenile and the lapidating happens. sent21: the singing AUC and the federalization happens. sent22: the Zephyr occurs. sent23: the antagonism and the conjuncture happens. | ¬{D} | sent1: {DE} sent2: {BJ} sent3: ({AB} & {CU}) sent4: (¬{B} & ¬{A}) -> {D} sent5: ({GC} & {IJ}) -> ¬{DL} sent6: ({Q} & {BT}) sent7: ({J} & {IR}) sent8: ¬{EP} sent9: ({A} & {C}) -> ¬{D} sent10: {FB} sent11: ({A} & {B}) sent12: ¬{B} -> ({A} & {EF}) sent13: {E} sent14: {E} -> {C} sent15: {IJ} sent16: {BD} sent17: ¬{F} -> ({D} & {E}) sent18: ¬{H} -> (¬{F} & ¬{G}) sent19: ¬{CM} sent20: ({EE} & {IK}) sent21: ({GM} & {CQ}) sent22: {B} sent23: ({L} & {P}) | [
"sent11 -> int1: the furling abampere happens.; sent14 & sent13 -> int2: that the segregation happens is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the furling abampere happens and the segregation happens.; int3 & sent9 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent11 -> int1: {A}; sent14 & sent13 -> int2: {C}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ({A} & {C}); int3 & sent9 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 3 | 3 | 19 | 0 | 19 | the accounting occurs. | {D} | 5 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the accounting does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the ribbing happens. sent2: the sociolinguisticsness occurs. sent3: both the cadetship and the furling AUC happens. sent4: if the Zephyr does not occur and the furling abampere does not occur then the accounting occurs. sent5: if the elongation and the encore occurs the logisticness does not occur. sent6: the immolation happens and the fortification happens. sent7: the unfastening mongoose and the trigonometricness happens. sent8: the Mass does not occur. sent9: that the furling abampere occurs and the segregation happens causes that the accounting does not occur. sent10: the backingness occurs. sent11: the furling abampere happens and the Zephyr happens. sent12: if the fact that the Zephyr does not occur hold then the furling abampere occurs and the discoing occurs. sent13: the furling recital occurs. sent14: the segregation happens if the furling recital occurs. sent15: the encore happens. sent16: the bootlegging happens. sent17: if the crutch does not occur then the accounting happens and the furling recital happens. sent18: if the epiphysealness does not occur then the crutch does not occur and the pyemicness does not occur. sent19: the unfastening Shaktist does not occur. sent20: the unfastening juvenile and the lapidating happens. sent21: the singing AUC and the federalization happens. sent22: the Zephyr occurs. sent23: the antagonism and the conjuncture happens. ; $proof$ = | sent11 -> int1: the furling abampere happens.; sent14 & sent13 -> int2: that the segregation happens is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the furling abampere happens and the segregation happens.; int3 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the furling abampere happens and the Zephyr happens. | [
"the segregation happens if the furling recital occurs.",
"the furling recital occurs.",
"that the furling abampere occurs and the segregation happens causes that the accounting does not occur."
] | [
"There is a furling and a Zephyr.",
"The furling is followed by the Zephyr.",
"The furling and the Zephyr happen at the same time."
] | The furling and the Zephyr happen at the same time. | that the furling abampere occurs and the segregation happens causes that the accounting does not occur. |
the phosphor is cursorial a beachcomber. | sent1: if the snot does not unfasten jerry-builder but it furls documentation then the phosphor does not furl sketcher. sent2: something that does not furl sketcher is cursorial and is a beachcomber. sent3: the snot is not cursorial if there is something such that the fact that it is a preceptor and is cursorial is false. sent4: if the phosphor does not furl sketcher it is cursorial. sent5: that the phosphor is cursorial hold. sent6: the snot is not a beachcomber if the phosphor does not furl sketcher but it furls documentation. sent7: everything is not subclavian. sent8: the snot does not unfasten jerry-builder and does furl documentation. sent9: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a siamang and it sings emcee is wrong then the snot is not a kind of a siamang. sent10: if something is not subclavian then the fact that it is a siamang and does sing emcee does not hold. sent11: if something does not furl sketcher then the fact that it is a preceptor and is cursorial is not right. sent12: the snot furls documentation. sent13: if something is not a siamang then it does furl sketcher and it is a preceptor. sent14: if something does not furl sketcher then it is cursorial. | ({A}{b} & {C}{b}) | sent1: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} sent2: (x): ¬{B}x -> ({A}x & {C}x) sent3: (x): ¬({D}x & {A}x) -> ¬{A}{a} sent4: ¬{B}{b} -> {A}{b} sent5: {A}{b} sent6: (¬{B}{b} & {AB}{b}) -> ¬{C}{a} sent7: (x): ¬{G}x sent8: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent9: (x): ¬({E}x & {F}x) -> ¬{E}{a} sent10: (x): ¬{G}x -> ¬({E}x & {F}x) sent11: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬({D}x & {A}x) sent12: {AB}{a} sent13: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({B}x & {D}x) sent14: (x): ¬{B}x -> {A}x | [
"sent1 & sent8 -> int1: the fact that the phosphor does not furl sketcher is right.; sent2 -> int2: if the phosphor does not furl sketcher it is cursorial and a beachcomber.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent1 & sent8 -> int1: ¬{B}{b}; sent2 -> int2: ¬{B}{b} -> ({A}{b} & {C}{b}); int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 2 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 11 | that the phosphor is cursorial and a beachcomber is not correct. | ¬({A}{b} & {C}{b}) | 10 | [
"sent13 -> int3: the snot furls sketcher and it is a kind of a preceptor if it is not a siamang.; sent10 -> int4: that the jerry-builder is a kind of a siamang that sings emcee is not correct if it is not subclavian.; sent7 -> int5: the jerry-builder is not subclavian.; int4 & int5 -> int6: that the jerry-builder is a siamang and it sings emcee is wrong.; int6 -> int7: there exists nothing that is a kind of a siamang and does sing emcee.; int7 -> int8: that the capuchin is a kind of a siamang and sings emcee does not hold.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that the fact that it is a siamang and it sings emcee is not right.; sent9 & int9 -> int10: the snot is not a siamang.; int3 & int10 -> int11: the snot does furl sketcher and is a preceptor.; int11 -> int12: the snot furls sketcher.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that it furls sketcher.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the phosphor is cursorial a beachcomber. ; $context$ = sent1: if the snot does not unfasten jerry-builder but it furls documentation then the phosphor does not furl sketcher. sent2: something that does not furl sketcher is cursorial and is a beachcomber. sent3: the snot is not cursorial if there is something such that the fact that it is a preceptor and is cursorial is false. sent4: if the phosphor does not furl sketcher it is cursorial. sent5: that the phosphor is cursorial hold. sent6: the snot is not a beachcomber if the phosphor does not furl sketcher but it furls documentation. sent7: everything is not subclavian. sent8: the snot does not unfasten jerry-builder and does furl documentation. sent9: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a siamang and it sings emcee is wrong then the snot is not a kind of a siamang. sent10: if something is not subclavian then the fact that it is a siamang and does sing emcee does not hold. sent11: if something does not furl sketcher then the fact that it is a preceptor and is cursorial is not right. sent12: the snot furls documentation. sent13: if something is not a siamang then it does furl sketcher and it is a preceptor. sent14: if something does not furl sketcher then it is cursorial. ; $proof$ = | sent1 & sent8 -> int1: the fact that the phosphor does not furl sketcher is right.; sent2 -> int2: if the phosphor does not furl sketcher it is cursorial and a beachcomber.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | if the snot does not unfasten jerry-builder but it furls documentation then the phosphor does not furl sketcher. | [
"the snot does not unfasten jerry-builder and does furl documentation.",
"something that does not furl sketcher is cursorial and is a beachcomber."
] | [
"The phosphor does not furl sketcher if the snot does not unfasten jerry-builder.",
"If the snot does not unfasten jerry-builder, then the phosphor does not furl sketcher."
] | The phosphor does not furl sketcher if the snot does not unfasten jerry-builder. | the snot does not unfasten jerry-builder and does furl documentation. |
the phosphor is cursorial a beachcomber. | sent1: if the snot does not unfasten jerry-builder but it furls documentation then the phosphor does not furl sketcher. sent2: something that does not furl sketcher is cursorial and is a beachcomber. sent3: the snot is not cursorial if there is something such that the fact that it is a preceptor and is cursorial is false. sent4: if the phosphor does not furl sketcher it is cursorial. sent5: that the phosphor is cursorial hold. sent6: the snot is not a beachcomber if the phosphor does not furl sketcher but it furls documentation. sent7: everything is not subclavian. sent8: the snot does not unfasten jerry-builder and does furl documentation. sent9: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a siamang and it sings emcee is wrong then the snot is not a kind of a siamang. sent10: if something is not subclavian then the fact that it is a siamang and does sing emcee does not hold. sent11: if something does not furl sketcher then the fact that it is a preceptor and is cursorial is not right. sent12: the snot furls documentation. sent13: if something is not a siamang then it does furl sketcher and it is a preceptor. sent14: if something does not furl sketcher then it is cursorial. | ({A}{b} & {C}{b}) | sent1: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} sent2: (x): ¬{B}x -> ({A}x & {C}x) sent3: (x): ¬({D}x & {A}x) -> ¬{A}{a} sent4: ¬{B}{b} -> {A}{b} sent5: {A}{b} sent6: (¬{B}{b} & {AB}{b}) -> ¬{C}{a} sent7: (x): ¬{G}x sent8: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent9: (x): ¬({E}x & {F}x) -> ¬{E}{a} sent10: (x): ¬{G}x -> ¬({E}x & {F}x) sent11: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬({D}x & {A}x) sent12: {AB}{a} sent13: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({B}x & {D}x) sent14: (x): ¬{B}x -> {A}x | [
"sent1 & sent8 -> int1: the fact that the phosphor does not furl sketcher is right.; sent2 -> int2: if the phosphor does not furl sketcher it is cursorial and a beachcomber.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent1 & sent8 -> int1: ¬{B}{b}; sent2 -> int2: ¬{B}{b} -> ({A}{b} & {C}{b}); int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 2 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 11 | that the phosphor is cursorial and a beachcomber is not correct. | ¬({A}{b} & {C}{b}) | 10 | [
"sent13 -> int3: the snot furls sketcher and it is a kind of a preceptor if it is not a siamang.; sent10 -> int4: that the jerry-builder is a kind of a siamang that sings emcee is not correct if it is not subclavian.; sent7 -> int5: the jerry-builder is not subclavian.; int4 & int5 -> int6: that the jerry-builder is a siamang and it sings emcee is wrong.; int6 -> int7: there exists nothing that is a kind of a siamang and does sing emcee.; int7 -> int8: that the capuchin is a kind of a siamang and sings emcee does not hold.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that the fact that it is a siamang and it sings emcee is not right.; sent9 & int9 -> int10: the snot is not a siamang.; int3 & int10 -> int11: the snot does furl sketcher and is a preceptor.; int11 -> int12: the snot furls sketcher.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that it furls sketcher.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the phosphor is cursorial a beachcomber. ; $context$ = sent1: if the snot does not unfasten jerry-builder but it furls documentation then the phosphor does not furl sketcher. sent2: something that does not furl sketcher is cursorial and is a beachcomber. sent3: the snot is not cursorial if there is something such that the fact that it is a preceptor and is cursorial is false. sent4: if the phosphor does not furl sketcher it is cursorial. sent5: that the phosphor is cursorial hold. sent6: the snot is not a beachcomber if the phosphor does not furl sketcher but it furls documentation. sent7: everything is not subclavian. sent8: the snot does not unfasten jerry-builder and does furl documentation. sent9: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a siamang and it sings emcee is wrong then the snot is not a kind of a siamang. sent10: if something is not subclavian then the fact that it is a siamang and does sing emcee does not hold. sent11: if something does not furl sketcher then the fact that it is a preceptor and is cursorial is not right. sent12: the snot furls documentation. sent13: if something is not a siamang then it does furl sketcher and it is a preceptor. sent14: if something does not furl sketcher then it is cursorial. ; $proof$ = | sent1 & sent8 -> int1: the fact that the phosphor does not furl sketcher is right.; sent2 -> int2: if the phosphor does not furl sketcher it is cursorial and a beachcomber.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | if the snot does not unfasten jerry-builder but it furls documentation then the phosphor does not furl sketcher. | [
"the snot does not unfasten jerry-builder and does furl documentation.",
"something that does not furl sketcher is cursorial and is a beachcomber."
] | [
"The phosphor does not furl sketcher if the snot does not unfasten jerry-builder.",
"If the snot does not unfasten jerry-builder, then the phosphor does not furl sketcher."
] | If the snot does not unfasten jerry-builder, then the phosphor does not furl sketcher. | something that does not furl sketcher is cursorial and is a beachcomber. |
there is something such that it is sublunar. | sent1: the knockout is not a fistmele. sent2: everything is not a kind of a Saginaw and is a headdress. sent3: something is not a concert-goer and furls autoclave if it is not a kind of a bone. sent4: the knockout is both not a fistmele and a Branchiostegidae. sent5: the comedienne is not a bone if the splash is a Nimrod and is a bone. sent6: there exists something such that it is nonpasserine. sent7: everything is not a latest. sent8: the knockout does not sing Ephesians but it is a Waldheim. sent9: there exists something such that that it is a kind of a begum hold. sent10: something wants. sent11: the riband is both not smart and a rigout. sent12: the autoclave does not trash but it is nonthermal. | (Ex): {AB}x | sent1: ¬{AA}{aa} sent2: (x): (¬{JC}x & {FP}x) sent3: (x): ¬{B}x -> (¬{A}x & {AU}x) sent4: (¬{AA}{aa} & {P}{aa}) sent5: ({C}{b} & {B}{b}) -> ¬{B}{a} sent6: (Ex): {HJ}x sent7: (x): ¬{IU}x sent8: (¬{IB}{aa} & {BL}{aa}) sent9: (Ex): {GQ}x sent10: (Ex): {BF}x sent11: (¬{DF}{ed} & {CT}{ed}) sent12: (¬{CS}{gu} & {AJ}{gu}) | [] | UNKNOWN | [] | UNKNOWN | 3 | null | 12 | 0 | 12 | there exists something such that it does furl autoclave. | (Ex): {AU}x | 6 | [
"sent3 -> int1: the comedienne is not a concert-goer and does furl autoclave if it does not bone.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = there is something such that it is sublunar. ; $context$ = sent1: the knockout is not a fistmele. sent2: everything is not a kind of a Saginaw and is a headdress. sent3: something is not a concert-goer and furls autoclave if it is not a kind of a bone. sent4: the knockout is both not a fistmele and a Branchiostegidae. sent5: the comedienne is not a bone if the splash is a Nimrod and is a bone. sent6: there exists something such that it is nonpasserine. sent7: everything is not a latest. sent8: the knockout does not sing Ephesians but it is a Waldheim. sent9: there exists something such that that it is a kind of a begum hold. sent10: something wants. sent11: the riband is both not smart and a rigout. sent12: the autoclave does not trash but it is nonthermal. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | everything is not a latest. | [
"something is not a concert-goer and furls autoclave if it is not a kind of a bone."
] | [
"everything is not a latest."
] | everything is not a latest. | something is not a concert-goer and furls autoclave if it is not a kind of a bone. |
the appraisal but not the craze occurs. | sent1: the logarithmicness and/or the geophyticness occurs. sent2: the animating occurs if the reveille occurs. sent3: the craze does not occur if the fact that the placebo does not occur and the singing abampere does not occur is not correct. sent4: the fact that the unfastening Florentine happens but the adulteration does not occur does not hold. sent5: the furling victim and the singing nephrectomy happens if that the actualness does not occur is not wrong. sent6: the naiveness occurs and/or the peripheral occurs. sent7: the furling victim and/or the singing nephrectomy occurs. sent8: if that not the screech but the actualness happens does not hold that the actualness does not occur is correct. sent9: if the singing nephrectomy happens the appraisal occurs. sent10: if the scything fizzing does not occur then that the fact that that not the screech but the actualness happens is not incorrect is wrong is right. sent11: the scything consideration does not occur if the fact that the fact that the affliction does not occur and the finalization does not occur is wrong is correct. sent12: that the appraisal does not occur is prevented by that the furling victim occurs. sent13: the furling Centre does not occur if the fact that the masturbating does not occur and the lift does not occur does not hold. sent14: that the appraisal but not the crazing happens is false if the furling victim occurs. sent15: if the fact that the Rhodesianness does not occur and the dancing does not occur does not hold the furling lawyer does not occur. sent16: if the audiometry occurs the Marianness happens. sent17: the audiometry occurs if the umbelliferousness occurs. | ({A} & ¬{B}) | sent1: ({DL} v {H}) sent2: {GN} -> {GK} sent3: ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) -> ¬{B} sent4: ¬({AG} & ¬{ER}) sent5: ¬{E} -> ({C} & {D}) sent6: ({ES} v {JH}) sent7: ({C} v {D}) sent8: ¬(¬{G} & {E}) -> ¬{E} sent9: {D} -> {A} sent10: ¬{F} -> ¬(¬{G} & {E}) sent11: ¬(¬{FC} & ¬{T}) -> ¬{EU} sent12: {C} -> {A} sent13: ¬(¬{EJ} & ¬{BP}) -> ¬{HJ} sent14: {C} -> ¬({A} & ¬{B}) sent15: ¬(¬{AD} & ¬{FB}) -> ¬{GL} sent16: {CR} -> {BT} sent17: {CK} -> {CR} | [
"sent7 & sent12 & sent9 -> int1: the appraisal occurs.;"
] | UNKNOWN | [
"sent7 & sent12 & sent9 -> int1: {A};"
] | UNKNOWN | 2 | null | 13 | 0 | 13 | the fact that the appraisal but not the craze happens is not right. | ¬({A} & ¬{B}) | 9 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the appraisal but not the craze occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the logarithmicness and/or the geophyticness occurs. sent2: the animating occurs if the reveille occurs. sent3: the craze does not occur if the fact that the placebo does not occur and the singing abampere does not occur is not correct. sent4: the fact that the unfastening Florentine happens but the adulteration does not occur does not hold. sent5: the furling victim and the singing nephrectomy happens if that the actualness does not occur is not wrong. sent6: the naiveness occurs and/or the peripheral occurs. sent7: the furling victim and/or the singing nephrectomy occurs. sent8: if that not the screech but the actualness happens does not hold that the actualness does not occur is correct. sent9: if the singing nephrectomy happens the appraisal occurs. sent10: if the scything fizzing does not occur then that the fact that that not the screech but the actualness happens is not incorrect is wrong is right. sent11: the scything consideration does not occur if the fact that the fact that the affliction does not occur and the finalization does not occur is wrong is correct. sent12: that the appraisal does not occur is prevented by that the furling victim occurs. sent13: the furling Centre does not occur if the fact that the masturbating does not occur and the lift does not occur does not hold. sent14: that the appraisal but not the crazing happens is false if the furling victim occurs. sent15: if the fact that the Rhodesianness does not occur and the dancing does not occur does not hold the furling lawyer does not occur. sent16: if the audiometry occurs the Marianness happens. sent17: the audiometry occurs if the umbelliferousness occurs. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | the furling victim and/or the singing nephrectomy occurs. | [
"that the appraisal does not occur is prevented by that the furling victim occurs.",
"if the singing nephrectomy happens the appraisal occurs."
] | [
"The singing nephrectomy occurs as a result of the furling victim.",
"The singing nephrectomy occurs when the victim is furling."
] | The singing nephrectomy occurs as a result of the furling victim. | that the appraisal does not occur is prevented by that the furling victim occurs. |
the appraisal but not the craze occurs. | sent1: the logarithmicness and/or the geophyticness occurs. sent2: the animating occurs if the reveille occurs. sent3: the craze does not occur if the fact that the placebo does not occur and the singing abampere does not occur is not correct. sent4: the fact that the unfastening Florentine happens but the adulteration does not occur does not hold. sent5: the furling victim and the singing nephrectomy happens if that the actualness does not occur is not wrong. sent6: the naiveness occurs and/or the peripheral occurs. sent7: the furling victim and/or the singing nephrectomy occurs. sent8: if that not the screech but the actualness happens does not hold that the actualness does not occur is correct. sent9: if the singing nephrectomy happens the appraisal occurs. sent10: if the scything fizzing does not occur then that the fact that that not the screech but the actualness happens is not incorrect is wrong is right. sent11: the scything consideration does not occur if the fact that the fact that the affliction does not occur and the finalization does not occur is wrong is correct. sent12: that the appraisal does not occur is prevented by that the furling victim occurs. sent13: the furling Centre does not occur if the fact that the masturbating does not occur and the lift does not occur does not hold. sent14: that the appraisal but not the crazing happens is false if the furling victim occurs. sent15: if the fact that the Rhodesianness does not occur and the dancing does not occur does not hold the furling lawyer does not occur. sent16: if the audiometry occurs the Marianness happens. sent17: the audiometry occurs if the umbelliferousness occurs. | ({A} & ¬{B}) | sent1: ({DL} v {H}) sent2: {GN} -> {GK} sent3: ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) -> ¬{B} sent4: ¬({AG} & ¬{ER}) sent5: ¬{E} -> ({C} & {D}) sent6: ({ES} v {JH}) sent7: ({C} v {D}) sent8: ¬(¬{G} & {E}) -> ¬{E} sent9: {D} -> {A} sent10: ¬{F} -> ¬(¬{G} & {E}) sent11: ¬(¬{FC} & ¬{T}) -> ¬{EU} sent12: {C} -> {A} sent13: ¬(¬{EJ} & ¬{BP}) -> ¬{HJ} sent14: {C} -> ¬({A} & ¬{B}) sent15: ¬(¬{AD} & ¬{FB}) -> ¬{GL} sent16: {CR} -> {BT} sent17: {CK} -> {CR} | [
"sent7 & sent12 & sent9 -> int1: the appraisal occurs.;"
] | UNKNOWN | [
"sent7 & sent12 & sent9 -> int1: {A};"
] | UNKNOWN | 2 | null | 13 | 0 | 13 | the fact that the appraisal but not the craze happens is not right. | ¬({A} & ¬{B}) | 9 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the appraisal but not the craze occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the logarithmicness and/or the geophyticness occurs. sent2: the animating occurs if the reveille occurs. sent3: the craze does not occur if the fact that the placebo does not occur and the singing abampere does not occur is not correct. sent4: the fact that the unfastening Florentine happens but the adulteration does not occur does not hold. sent5: the furling victim and the singing nephrectomy happens if that the actualness does not occur is not wrong. sent6: the naiveness occurs and/or the peripheral occurs. sent7: the furling victim and/or the singing nephrectomy occurs. sent8: if that not the screech but the actualness happens does not hold that the actualness does not occur is correct. sent9: if the singing nephrectomy happens the appraisal occurs. sent10: if the scything fizzing does not occur then that the fact that that not the screech but the actualness happens is not incorrect is wrong is right. sent11: the scything consideration does not occur if the fact that the fact that the affliction does not occur and the finalization does not occur is wrong is correct. sent12: that the appraisal does not occur is prevented by that the furling victim occurs. sent13: the furling Centre does not occur if the fact that the masturbating does not occur and the lift does not occur does not hold. sent14: that the appraisal but not the crazing happens is false if the furling victim occurs. sent15: if the fact that the Rhodesianness does not occur and the dancing does not occur does not hold the furling lawyer does not occur. sent16: if the audiometry occurs the Marianness happens. sent17: the audiometry occurs if the umbelliferousness occurs. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | the furling victim and/or the singing nephrectomy occurs. | [
"that the appraisal does not occur is prevented by that the furling victim occurs.",
"if the singing nephrectomy happens the appraisal occurs."
] | [
"The singing nephrectomy occurs as a result of the furling victim.",
"The singing nephrectomy occurs when the victim is furling."
] | The singing nephrectomy occurs when the victim is furling. | if the singing nephrectomy happens the appraisal occurs. |
there is something such that it is a kind of a Guevara and it is a kind of a spokeswoman. | sent1: if the goldeneye is not an episteme it is a Guevara and a spokeswoman. sent2: there exists something such that it is a spokeswoman. sent3: the ebony is a spokeswoman and does peruse. sent4: that the trivet is a Guevara hold. | (Ex): ({A}x & {B}x) | sent1: ¬{C}{jf} -> ({A}{jf} & {B}{jf}) sent2: (Ex): {B}x sent3: ({B}{hg} & {JH}{hg}) sent4: {A}{a} | [] | UNKNOWN | [] | UNKNOWN | 2 | null | 3 | 0 | 3 | that the goldeneye is a Guevara is correct. | {A}{jf} | 5 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = there is something such that it is a kind of a Guevara and it is a kind of a spokeswoman. ; $context$ = sent1: if the goldeneye is not an episteme it is a Guevara and a spokeswoman. sent2: there exists something such that it is a spokeswoman. sent3: the ebony is a spokeswoman and does peruse. sent4: that the trivet is a Guevara hold. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | the ebony is a spokeswoman and does peruse. | [
"there exists something such that it is a spokeswoman."
] | [
"the ebony is a spokeswoman and does peruse."
] | the ebony is a spokeswoman and does peruse. | there exists something such that it is a spokeswoman. |
the pediatricsness does not occur and the furling porkpie happens. | sent1: the sidestep does not occur. sent2: the sidestep is caused by that both the pediatricsness and the furling porkpie occurs. sent3: if the sharp happens then the ordinalness happens. sent4: the fact that not the furling PSF but the bottomness occurs is not true if the sleeper does not occur. sent5: if the fact that the fact that not the furling PSF but the bottomness occurs is not true hold the Celtic does not occur. sent6: the furling caviar occurs. sent7: the battue does not occur if both the decimation and the unfastening Bellini happens. sent8: the decimation occurs if the ordinal happens. sent9: that the pediatricsness happens and the furling porkpie occurs is not true. sent10: if the javelin happens then the non-pediatricsness and the furling porkpie happens. sent11: the sharp happens and the dactylicness happens. sent12: that the sleeper does not occur and the transposition does not occur is brought about by that the battue does not occur. sent13: that both the non-pediatricsness and the furling porkpie occurs prevents that the sidestep does not occur. sent14: both the javelin and the sidestep happens if the Celtic does not occur. | (¬{AA} & {AB}) | sent1: ¬{B} sent2: ({AA} & {AB}) -> {B} sent3: {M} -> {L} sent4: ¬{F} -> ¬(¬{D} & {E}) sent5: ¬(¬{D} & {E}) -> ¬{C} sent6: {CH} sent7: ({J} & {I}) -> ¬{H} sent8: {L} -> {J} sent9: ¬({AA} & {AB}) sent10: {A} -> (¬{AA} & {AB}) sent11: ({M} & {O}) sent12: ¬{H} -> (¬{F} & ¬{G}) sent13: (¬{AA} & {AB}) -> {B} sent14: ¬{C} -> ({A} & {B}) | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the non-pediatricsness and the furling porkpie occurs.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the sidestep happens.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"void -> assump1: (¬{AA} & {AB}); sent13 & assump1 -> int1: {B}; int1 & sent1 -> int2: #F#; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 3 | 3 | 12 | 0 | 12 | the pediatricsness does not occur and the furling porkpie occurs. | (¬{AA} & {AB}) | 12 | [
"sent11 -> int3: the sharpness occurs.; sent3 & int3 -> int4: the ordinal happens.; sent8 & int4 -> int5: the decimation happens.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the pediatricsness does not occur and the furling porkpie happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the sidestep does not occur. sent2: the sidestep is caused by that both the pediatricsness and the furling porkpie occurs. sent3: if the sharp happens then the ordinalness happens. sent4: the fact that not the furling PSF but the bottomness occurs is not true if the sleeper does not occur. sent5: if the fact that the fact that not the furling PSF but the bottomness occurs is not true hold the Celtic does not occur. sent6: the furling caviar occurs. sent7: the battue does not occur if both the decimation and the unfastening Bellini happens. sent8: the decimation occurs if the ordinal happens. sent9: that the pediatricsness happens and the furling porkpie occurs is not true. sent10: if the javelin happens then the non-pediatricsness and the furling porkpie happens. sent11: the sharp happens and the dactylicness happens. sent12: that the sleeper does not occur and the transposition does not occur is brought about by that the battue does not occur. sent13: that both the non-pediatricsness and the furling porkpie occurs prevents that the sidestep does not occur. sent14: both the javelin and the sidestep happens if the Celtic does not occur. ; $proof$ = | void -> assump1: Let's assume that the non-pediatricsness and the furling porkpie occurs.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the sidestep happens.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | that both the non-pediatricsness and the furling porkpie occurs prevents that the sidestep does not occur. | [
"the sidestep does not occur."
] | [
"that both the non-pediatricsness and the furling porkpie occurs prevents that the sidestep does not occur."
] | that both the non-pediatricsness and the furling porkpie occurs prevents that the sidestep does not occur. | the sidestep does not occur. |
the Plasticine perfects. | sent1: the Plasticine is perfected if it is supportive. sent2: if that something does not impugn Apterygidae but it is a kind of a dronabinol does not hold then it does rehear Ismaili. sent3: the fact that the telegraphy does not rough Kamet and is supportive is wrong. sent4: that that the Plasticine is supportive thing that impugns wheatworm is incorrect is true. sent5: if there is something such that it does rehear Hargeisa then that the Plasticine is supportive and impugns wheatworm is incorrect. sent6: if the wheatworm is an astringent then the diestock is not a Thai but it is perfected. sent7: the fact that the Plasticine is not a turnout but a subject does not hold. sent8: the Plasticine is not perfected if the diestock is not a Thai but it is perfected. sent9: the fact that the Plasticine does not impugn wheatworm but it is an outtake is false if something does rough myriad. sent10: something is perfected if it is supportive. sent11: if something does not rehear Hargeisa but it is supportive then it is not perfected. sent12: if the fact that something is not supportive but it impugns wheatworm is not correct then the fact that it is not perfected is not correct. sent13: that the diestock does impugn wheatworm and is not an astringent hold if it is a kind of a Thai. sent14: the fact that the Plasticine does not rehear Hargeisa but it does rough animalization is wrong. sent15: that the plush impugns wheatworm is right. sent16: something rehears Hargeisa. sent17: the fact that the teapot does not impugn wheatworm but it rehears saurel is false. sent18: something that rehears Hargeisa is supportive. sent19: there are blastomycotic things. sent20: that the Plasticine is not supportive but it does impugn wheatworm is not right if there exists something such that it rehears Hargeisa. | {D}{a} | sent1: {B}{a} -> {D}{a} sent2: (x): ¬(¬{DT}x & {AE}x) -> {EC}x sent3: ¬(¬{GT}{gm} & {B}{gm}) sent4: ¬({B}{a} & {C}{a}) sent5: (x): {A}x -> ¬({B}{a} & {C}{a}) sent6: {E}{c} -> (¬{F}{b} & {D}{b}) sent7: ¬(¬{EB}{a} & {GB}{a}) sent8: (¬{F}{b} & {D}{b}) -> ¬{D}{a} sent9: (x): {EL}x -> ¬(¬{C}{a} & {HN}{a}) sent10: (x): {B}x -> {D}x sent11: (x): (¬{A}x & {B}x) -> ¬{D}x sent12: (x): ¬(¬{B}x & {C}x) -> {D}x sent13: {F}{b} -> ({C}{b} & ¬{E}{b}) sent14: ¬(¬{A}{a} & {FA}{a}) sent15: {C}{fq} sent16: (Ex): {A}x sent17: ¬(¬{C}{gq} & {AP}{gq}) sent18: (x): {A}x -> {B}x sent19: (Ex): {GU}x sent20: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}) | [
"sent16 & sent20 -> int1: the fact that the Plasticine is unsupportive but it impugns wheatworm does not hold.; sent12 -> int2: the Plasticine perfects if that it is not supportive and impugns wheatworm is false.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent16 & sent20 -> int1: ¬(¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}); sent12 -> int2: ¬(¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}) -> {D}{a}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 2 | 2 | 17 | 0 | 17 | the Plasticine does not perfect. | ¬{D}{a} | 6 | [
"sent11 -> int3: if the Plasticine does not rehear Hargeisa but it is supportive then it is not perfected.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the Plasticine perfects. ; $context$ = sent1: the Plasticine is perfected if it is supportive. sent2: if that something does not impugn Apterygidae but it is a kind of a dronabinol does not hold then it does rehear Ismaili. sent3: the fact that the telegraphy does not rough Kamet and is supportive is wrong. sent4: that that the Plasticine is supportive thing that impugns wheatworm is incorrect is true. sent5: if there is something such that it does rehear Hargeisa then that the Plasticine is supportive and impugns wheatworm is incorrect. sent6: if the wheatworm is an astringent then the diestock is not a Thai but it is perfected. sent7: the fact that the Plasticine is not a turnout but a subject does not hold. sent8: the Plasticine is not perfected if the diestock is not a Thai but it is perfected. sent9: the fact that the Plasticine does not impugn wheatworm but it is an outtake is false if something does rough myriad. sent10: something is perfected if it is supportive. sent11: if something does not rehear Hargeisa but it is supportive then it is not perfected. sent12: if the fact that something is not supportive but it impugns wheatworm is not correct then the fact that it is not perfected is not correct. sent13: that the diestock does impugn wheatworm and is not an astringent hold if it is a kind of a Thai. sent14: the fact that the Plasticine does not rehear Hargeisa but it does rough animalization is wrong. sent15: that the plush impugns wheatworm is right. sent16: something rehears Hargeisa. sent17: the fact that the teapot does not impugn wheatworm but it rehears saurel is false. sent18: something that rehears Hargeisa is supportive. sent19: there are blastomycotic things. sent20: that the Plasticine is not supportive but it does impugn wheatworm is not right if there exists something such that it rehears Hargeisa. ; $proof$ = | sent16 & sent20 -> int1: the fact that the Plasticine is unsupportive but it impugns wheatworm does not hold.; sent12 -> int2: the Plasticine perfects if that it is not supportive and impugns wheatworm is false.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | something rehears Hargeisa. | [
"that the Plasticine is not supportive but it does impugn wheatworm is not right if there exists something such that it rehears Hargeisa.",
"if the fact that something is not supportive but it impugns wheatworm is not correct then the fact that it is not perfected is not correct."
] | [
"Hargeisa hears something.",
"Something sounds like Hargeisa."
] | Hargeisa hears something. | that the Plasticine is not supportive but it does impugn wheatworm is not right if there exists something such that it rehears Hargeisa. |
the Plasticine perfects. | sent1: the Plasticine is perfected if it is supportive. sent2: if that something does not impugn Apterygidae but it is a kind of a dronabinol does not hold then it does rehear Ismaili. sent3: the fact that the telegraphy does not rough Kamet and is supportive is wrong. sent4: that that the Plasticine is supportive thing that impugns wheatworm is incorrect is true. sent5: if there is something such that it does rehear Hargeisa then that the Plasticine is supportive and impugns wheatworm is incorrect. sent6: if the wheatworm is an astringent then the diestock is not a Thai but it is perfected. sent7: the fact that the Plasticine is not a turnout but a subject does not hold. sent8: the Plasticine is not perfected if the diestock is not a Thai but it is perfected. sent9: the fact that the Plasticine does not impugn wheatworm but it is an outtake is false if something does rough myriad. sent10: something is perfected if it is supportive. sent11: if something does not rehear Hargeisa but it is supportive then it is not perfected. sent12: if the fact that something is not supportive but it impugns wheatworm is not correct then the fact that it is not perfected is not correct. sent13: that the diestock does impugn wheatworm and is not an astringent hold if it is a kind of a Thai. sent14: the fact that the Plasticine does not rehear Hargeisa but it does rough animalization is wrong. sent15: that the plush impugns wheatworm is right. sent16: something rehears Hargeisa. sent17: the fact that the teapot does not impugn wheatworm but it rehears saurel is false. sent18: something that rehears Hargeisa is supportive. sent19: there are blastomycotic things. sent20: that the Plasticine is not supportive but it does impugn wheatworm is not right if there exists something such that it rehears Hargeisa. | {D}{a} | sent1: {B}{a} -> {D}{a} sent2: (x): ¬(¬{DT}x & {AE}x) -> {EC}x sent3: ¬(¬{GT}{gm} & {B}{gm}) sent4: ¬({B}{a} & {C}{a}) sent5: (x): {A}x -> ¬({B}{a} & {C}{a}) sent6: {E}{c} -> (¬{F}{b} & {D}{b}) sent7: ¬(¬{EB}{a} & {GB}{a}) sent8: (¬{F}{b} & {D}{b}) -> ¬{D}{a} sent9: (x): {EL}x -> ¬(¬{C}{a} & {HN}{a}) sent10: (x): {B}x -> {D}x sent11: (x): (¬{A}x & {B}x) -> ¬{D}x sent12: (x): ¬(¬{B}x & {C}x) -> {D}x sent13: {F}{b} -> ({C}{b} & ¬{E}{b}) sent14: ¬(¬{A}{a} & {FA}{a}) sent15: {C}{fq} sent16: (Ex): {A}x sent17: ¬(¬{C}{gq} & {AP}{gq}) sent18: (x): {A}x -> {B}x sent19: (Ex): {GU}x sent20: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}) | [
"sent16 & sent20 -> int1: the fact that the Plasticine is unsupportive but it impugns wheatworm does not hold.; sent12 -> int2: the Plasticine perfects if that it is not supportive and impugns wheatworm is false.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent16 & sent20 -> int1: ¬(¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}); sent12 -> int2: ¬(¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}) -> {D}{a}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 2 | 2 | 17 | 0 | 17 | the Plasticine does not perfect. | ¬{D}{a} | 6 | [
"sent11 -> int3: if the Plasticine does not rehear Hargeisa but it is supportive then it is not perfected.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the Plasticine perfects. ; $context$ = sent1: the Plasticine is perfected if it is supportive. sent2: if that something does not impugn Apterygidae but it is a kind of a dronabinol does not hold then it does rehear Ismaili. sent3: the fact that the telegraphy does not rough Kamet and is supportive is wrong. sent4: that that the Plasticine is supportive thing that impugns wheatworm is incorrect is true. sent5: if there is something such that it does rehear Hargeisa then that the Plasticine is supportive and impugns wheatworm is incorrect. sent6: if the wheatworm is an astringent then the diestock is not a Thai but it is perfected. sent7: the fact that the Plasticine is not a turnout but a subject does not hold. sent8: the Plasticine is not perfected if the diestock is not a Thai but it is perfected. sent9: the fact that the Plasticine does not impugn wheatworm but it is an outtake is false if something does rough myriad. sent10: something is perfected if it is supportive. sent11: if something does not rehear Hargeisa but it is supportive then it is not perfected. sent12: if the fact that something is not supportive but it impugns wheatworm is not correct then the fact that it is not perfected is not correct. sent13: that the diestock does impugn wheatworm and is not an astringent hold if it is a kind of a Thai. sent14: the fact that the Plasticine does not rehear Hargeisa but it does rough animalization is wrong. sent15: that the plush impugns wheatworm is right. sent16: something rehears Hargeisa. sent17: the fact that the teapot does not impugn wheatworm but it rehears saurel is false. sent18: something that rehears Hargeisa is supportive. sent19: there are blastomycotic things. sent20: that the Plasticine is not supportive but it does impugn wheatworm is not right if there exists something such that it rehears Hargeisa. ; $proof$ = | sent16 & sent20 -> int1: the fact that the Plasticine is unsupportive but it impugns wheatworm does not hold.; sent12 -> int2: the Plasticine perfects if that it is not supportive and impugns wheatworm is false.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | something rehears Hargeisa. | [
"that the Plasticine is not supportive but it does impugn wheatworm is not right if there exists something such that it rehears Hargeisa.",
"if the fact that something is not supportive but it impugns wheatworm is not correct then the fact that it is not perfected is not correct."
] | [
"Hargeisa hears something.",
"Something sounds like Hargeisa."
] | Something sounds like Hargeisa. | if the fact that something is not supportive but it impugns wheatworm is not correct then the fact that it is not perfected is not correct. |
that the chimneystack is not tetanic or unmodifiable or both does not hold. | sent1: the orthodontist is tetanic. sent2: the teacake is nonmetallic. sent3: the teacake does not rehear epithalamium if it does impugn chalazion and it is nonmetallic. sent4: the chimneystack is tetanic or is unmodifiable or both if it is an ordinary. sent5: that the indexer is anaclitic is true. sent6: the teacake does impugn chalazion. sent7: something is not tetanic and/or it is unmodifiable if it is an ordinary. sent8: the chimneystack is not Bayesian and/or it is unmodifiable if it does irradiate. sent9: the Jeroboam rehears dominus or it is anaclitic or both. sent10: the chimneystack is anaclitic. sent11: the chimneystack is not ordinary if that the crosshead is both not anaclitic and an ordinary is incorrect. sent12: if the freelancer is Bayesian then the teacake does impugn Jeroboam. sent13: if something is not ordinary the fact that it either is not tetanic or is unmodifiable or both is not true. sent14: if something that does not rehear epithalamium impugns Jeroboam then it is not a fare-thee-well. sent15: something is Bayesian if it is real-time. sent16: if something is anaclitic it is lax and/or it is not a kind of an ordinary. sent17: if the chimneystack is a kind of a Restoration then it is unmodifiable or it is a gannet or both. sent18: the chimneystack is an ordinary and it is anaclitic. sent19: if the teacake is not a kind of a fare-thee-well the crosshead is anaclitic. sent20: something is tetanic and/or it is unmodifiable if it is an ordinary. sent21: the chimneystack is tetanic and/or it is unmodifiable. | ¬(¬{AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) | sent1: {AA}{ac} sent2: {G}{b} sent3: ({H}{b} & {G}{b}) -> ¬{F}{b} sent4: {A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) sent5: {B}{cd} sent6: {H}{b} sent7: (x): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x v {AB}x) sent8: {AN}{aa} -> (¬{I}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) sent9: ({AI}{ea} v {B}{ea}) sent10: {B}{aa} sent11: ¬(¬{B}{a} & {A}{a}) -> ¬{A}{aa} sent12: {I}{c} -> {E}{b} sent13: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x v {AB}x) sent14: (x): (¬{F}x & {E}x) -> ¬{D}x sent15: (x): {J}x -> {I}x sent16: (x): {B}x -> ({C}x v ¬{A}x) sent17: {DA}{aa} -> ({AB}{aa} v {BK}{aa}) sent18: ({A}{aa} & {B}{aa}) sent19: ¬{D}{b} -> {B}{a} sent20: (x): {A}x -> ({AA}x v {AB}x) sent21: ({AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) | [
"sent7 -> int1: if the chimneystack is ordinary it is not tetanic and/or is unmodifiable.; sent18 -> int2: the fact that the chimneystack is ordinary is not false.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent7 -> int1: {A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}); sent18 -> int2: {A}{aa}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 2 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 19 | the fact that either the chimneystack is not tetanic or it is unmodifiable or both does not hold. | ¬(¬{AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) | 5 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that the chimneystack is not tetanic or unmodifiable or both does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the orthodontist is tetanic. sent2: the teacake is nonmetallic. sent3: the teacake does not rehear epithalamium if it does impugn chalazion and it is nonmetallic. sent4: the chimneystack is tetanic or is unmodifiable or both if it is an ordinary. sent5: that the indexer is anaclitic is true. sent6: the teacake does impugn chalazion. sent7: something is not tetanic and/or it is unmodifiable if it is an ordinary. sent8: the chimneystack is not Bayesian and/or it is unmodifiable if it does irradiate. sent9: the Jeroboam rehears dominus or it is anaclitic or both. sent10: the chimneystack is anaclitic. sent11: the chimneystack is not ordinary if that the crosshead is both not anaclitic and an ordinary is incorrect. sent12: if the freelancer is Bayesian then the teacake does impugn Jeroboam. sent13: if something is not ordinary the fact that it either is not tetanic or is unmodifiable or both is not true. sent14: if something that does not rehear epithalamium impugns Jeroboam then it is not a fare-thee-well. sent15: something is Bayesian if it is real-time. sent16: if something is anaclitic it is lax and/or it is not a kind of an ordinary. sent17: if the chimneystack is a kind of a Restoration then it is unmodifiable or it is a gannet or both. sent18: the chimneystack is an ordinary and it is anaclitic. sent19: if the teacake is not a kind of a fare-thee-well the crosshead is anaclitic. sent20: something is tetanic and/or it is unmodifiable if it is an ordinary. sent21: the chimneystack is tetanic and/or it is unmodifiable. ; $proof$ = | sent7 -> int1: if the chimneystack is ordinary it is not tetanic and/or is unmodifiable.; sent18 -> int2: the fact that the chimneystack is ordinary is not false.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | something is not tetanic and/or it is unmodifiable if it is an ordinary. | [
"the chimneystack is an ordinary and it is anaclitic."
] | [
"something is not tetanic and/or it is unmodifiable if it is an ordinary."
] | something is not tetanic and/or it is unmodifiable if it is an ordinary. | the chimneystack is an ordinary and it is anaclitic. |
the placeholder does not rough shariah. | sent1: if the placeholder is a kind of a burden then it is a kind of a moor. sent2: the fact that the placeholder is non-rhombic thing that is not a moor is not right. sent3: the placeholder is a debut. sent4: if that that the placeholder is not rhombic and is not a kind of a moor is not right is correct then it roughs shariah. sent5: that the Chandler is rhombic hold. sent6: that the sackbut is not revivalistic and it does not rough shariah does not hold. sent7: that the mountebank is not Flemish and is a kind of a moor does not hold. sent8: if the placeholder is a skimming it does rehear Smilax. sent9: that the dummy does not impugn dummy and is a kind of a dorsum is not true. sent10: the placeholder is a wheeled. sent11: the fact that the placeholder is not mathematical and is not expressible is wrong. | ¬{B}{a} | sent1: {J}{a} -> {AB}{a} sent2: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent3: {AE}{a} sent4: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} sent5: {AA}{ak} sent6: ¬(¬{HS}{fn} & ¬{B}{fn}) sent7: ¬(¬{FO}{hm} & {AB}{hm}) sent8: {BG}{a} -> {ER}{a} sent9: ¬(¬{JH}{eo} & {IL}{eo}) sent10: {GI}{a} sent11: ¬(¬{CH}{a} & ¬{HT}{a}) | [
"sent4 & sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent4 & sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 9 | null | null | null | [] | null | null | $hypothesis$ = the placeholder does not rough shariah. ; $context$ = sent1: if the placeholder is a kind of a burden then it is a kind of a moor. sent2: the fact that the placeholder is non-rhombic thing that is not a moor is not right. sent3: the placeholder is a debut. sent4: if that that the placeholder is not rhombic and is not a kind of a moor is not right is correct then it roughs shariah. sent5: that the Chandler is rhombic hold. sent6: that the sackbut is not revivalistic and it does not rough shariah does not hold. sent7: that the mountebank is not Flemish and is a kind of a moor does not hold. sent8: if the placeholder is a skimming it does rehear Smilax. sent9: that the dummy does not impugn dummy and is a kind of a dorsum is not true. sent10: the placeholder is a wheeled. sent11: the fact that the placeholder is not mathematical and is not expressible is wrong. ; $proof$ = | sent4 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | if that that the placeholder is not rhombic and is not a kind of a moor is not right is correct then it roughs shariah. | [
"the fact that the placeholder is non-rhombic thing that is not a moor is not right."
] | [
"if that that the placeholder is not rhombic and is not a kind of a moor is not right is correct then it roughs shariah."
] | if that that the placeholder is not rhombic and is not a kind of a moor is not right is correct then it roughs shariah. | the fact that the placeholder is non-rhombic thing that is not a moor is not right. |
the fact that the giraffe is agonistic and it does rehear pellucidness does not hold. | sent1: the giraffe is a pro. sent2: the fact that the Timorese does not rehear signalman and/or is on-site is not correct if the fitting is an otology. sent3: the fitting is a kind of an otology that does rough lure if the fact that the lure is not a policeman hold. sent4: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a turnery but calyptrate is wrong the giraffe is agonistic. sent5: a non-centesimal thing does impugn omen and is not a bombazine. sent6: the giraffe is calyptrate. sent7: the cattalo is a kind of a Seriphidium if that the giraffe is non-cinerary thing that is annexational is not true. sent8: if the giraffe is annexational it rehears pellucidness. sent9: the giraffe is annexational if there exists something such that it does rehear pellucidness. sent10: the giraffe is annexational. sent11: if the oilman is on-site it is immaterial. sent12: if something is not annexational then the fact that it is agonistic and does rehear pellucidness does not hold. sent13: the lure is not a kind of a policeman if there exists something such that it does impugn omen and is not a bombazine. sent14: the javelin is not centesimal if it does romanticize and is not a change-up. sent15: the caraway is not nondeductible if the Timorese is nondeductible. sent16: the retinene is not annexational and/or it is not non-cinerary if the caraway is not nondeductible. sent17: if the fact that something does not rehear signalman and/or it is on-site does not hold it is nondeductible. sent18: the javelin does romanticize but it is not a change-up. sent19: there is something such that that it is not a turnery but calyptrate is not true. | ¬({A}{a} & {B}{a}) | sent1: {DF}{a} sent2: {H}{e} -> ¬(¬{G}{d} v {F}{d}) sent3: ¬{J}{f} -> ({H}{e} & {I}{e}) sent4: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {A}{a} sent5: (x): ¬{M}x -> ({K}x & ¬{L}x) sent6: {AB}{a} sent7: ¬(¬{D}{a} & {C}{a}) -> {DM}{gu} sent8: {C}{a} -> {B}{a} sent9: (x): {B}x -> {C}{a} sent10: {C}{a} sent11: {F}{hd} -> {HP}{hd} sent12: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬({A}x & {B}x) sent13: (x): ({K}x & ¬{L}x) -> ¬{J}{f} sent14: ({O}{g} & ¬{N}{g}) -> ¬{M}{g} sent15: {E}{d} -> ¬{E}{c} sent16: ¬{E}{c} -> (¬{C}{b} v {D}{b}) sent17: (x): ¬(¬{G}x v {F}x) -> {E}x sent18: ({O}{g} & ¬{N}{g}) sent19: (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) | [
"sent19 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the giraffe is agonistic is true.; sent8 & sent10 -> int2: the fact that the giraffe does rehear pellucidness hold.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent19 & sent4 -> int1: {A}{a}; sent8 & sent10 -> int2: {B}{a}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 2 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 15 | the fact that the giraffe is agonistic and it rehears pellucidness is wrong. | ¬({A}{a} & {B}{a}) | 13 | [
"sent12 -> int3: that the giraffe is agonistic and rehears pellucidness is wrong if it is not annexational.; sent17 -> int4: the Timorese is nondeductible if that it does not rehear signalman and/or it is on-site does not hold.; sent5 -> int5: if the javelin is not centesimal it impugns omen and is not a bombazine.; sent14 & sent18 -> int6: the javelin is not centesimal.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the javelin impugns omen but it is not a bombazine.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it impugns omen and it is not a bombazine.; int8 & sent13 -> int9: that the lure is not a policeman is not incorrect.; sent3 & int9 -> int10: the fitting is a kind of an otology and it roughs lure.; int10 -> int11: the fitting is an otology.; sent2 & int11 -> int12: the fact that the Timorese either does not rehear signalman or is on-site or both is not correct.; int4 & int12 -> int13: the Timorese is nondeductible.; sent15 & int13 -> int14: the caraway is deductible.; sent16 & int14 -> int15: either the retinene is not annexational or it is cinerary or both.; int15 -> int16: something is not annexational and/or it is cinerary.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the giraffe is agonistic and it does rehear pellucidness does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the giraffe is a pro. sent2: the fact that the Timorese does not rehear signalman and/or is on-site is not correct if the fitting is an otology. sent3: the fitting is a kind of an otology that does rough lure if the fact that the lure is not a policeman hold. sent4: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a turnery but calyptrate is wrong the giraffe is agonistic. sent5: a non-centesimal thing does impugn omen and is not a bombazine. sent6: the giraffe is calyptrate. sent7: the cattalo is a kind of a Seriphidium if that the giraffe is non-cinerary thing that is annexational is not true. sent8: if the giraffe is annexational it rehears pellucidness. sent9: the giraffe is annexational if there exists something such that it does rehear pellucidness. sent10: the giraffe is annexational. sent11: if the oilman is on-site it is immaterial. sent12: if something is not annexational then the fact that it is agonistic and does rehear pellucidness does not hold. sent13: the lure is not a kind of a policeman if there exists something such that it does impugn omen and is not a bombazine. sent14: the javelin is not centesimal if it does romanticize and is not a change-up. sent15: the caraway is not nondeductible if the Timorese is nondeductible. sent16: the retinene is not annexational and/or it is not non-cinerary if the caraway is not nondeductible. sent17: if the fact that something does not rehear signalman and/or it is on-site does not hold it is nondeductible. sent18: the javelin does romanticize but it is not a change-up. sent19: there is something such that that it is not a turnery but calyptrate is not true. ; $proof$ = | sent19 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the giraffe is agonistic is true.; sent8 & sent10 -> int2: the fact that the giraffe does rehear pellucidness hold.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | there is something such that that it is not a turnery but calyptrate is not true. | [
"if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a turnery but calyptrate is wrong the giraffe is agonistic.",
"if the giraffe is annexational it rehears pellucidness.",
"the giraffe is annexational."
] | [
"It is not a turnery but calyptrate is not true.",
"It is not a turnery but it is not calyptrate.",
"It is not a turnery, but calyptrate is not true."
] | It is not a turnery but calyptrate is not true. | if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a turnery but calyptrate is wrong the giraffe is agonistic. |
the fact that the giraffe is agonistic and it does rehear pellucidness does not hold. | sent1: the giraffe is a pro. sent2: the fact that the Timorese does not rehear signalman and/or is on-site is not correct if the fitting is an otology. sent3: the fitting is a kind of an otology that does rough lure if the fact that the lure is not a policeman hold. sent4: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a turnery but calyptrate is wrong the giraffe is agonistic. sent5: a non-centesimal thing does impugn omen and is not a bombazine. sent6: the giraffe is calyptrate. sent7: the cattalo is a kind of a Seriphidium if that the giraffe is non-cinerary thing that is annexational is not true. sent8: if the giraffe is annexational it rehears pellucidness. sent9: the giraffe is annexational if there exists something such that it does rehear pellucidness. sent10: the giraffe is annexational. sent11: if the oilman is on-site it is immaterial. sent12: if something is not annexational then the fact that it is agonistic and does rehear pellucidness does not hold. sent13: the lure is not a kind of a policeman if there exists something such that it does impugn omen and is not a bombazine. sent14: the javelin is not centesimal if it does romanticize and is not a change-up. sent15: the caraway is not nondeductible if the Timorese is nondeductible. sent16: the retinene is not annexational and/or it is not non-cinerary if the caraway is not nondeductible. sent17: if the fact that something does not rehear signalman and/or it is on-site does not hold it is nondeductible. sent18: the javelin does romanticize but it is not a change-up. sent19: there is something such that that it is not a turnery but calyptrate is not true. | ¬({A}{a} & {B}{a}) | sent1: {DF}{a} sent2: {H}{e} -> ¬(¬{G}{d} v {F}{d}) sent3: ¬{J}{f} -> ({H}{e} & {I}{e}) sent4: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {A}{a} sent5: (x): ¬{M}x -> ({K}x & ¬{L}x) sent6: {AB}{a} sent7: ¬(¬{D}{a} & {C}{a}) -> {DM}{gu} sent8: {C}{a} -> {B}{a} sent9: (x): {B}x -> {C}{a} sent10: {C}{a} sent11: {F}{hd} -> {HP}{hd} sent12: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬({A}x & {B}x) sent13: (x): ({K}x & ¬{L}x) -> ¬{J}{f} sent14: ({O}{g} & ¬{N}{g}) -> ¬{M}{g} sent15: {E}{d} -> ¬{E}{c} sent16: ¬{E}{c} -> (¬{C}{b} v {D}{b}) sent17: (x): ¬(¬{G}x v {F}x) -> {E}x sent18: ({O}{g} & ¬{N}{g}) sent19: (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) | [
"sent19 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the giraffe is agonistic is true.; sent8 & sent10 -> int2: the fact that the giraffe does rehear pellucidness hold.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent19 & sent4 -> int1: {A}{a}; sent8 & sent10 -> int2: {B}{a}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 2 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 15 | the fact that the giraffe is agonistic and it rehears pellucidness is wrong. | ¬({A}{a} & {B}{a}) | 13 | [
"sent12 -> int3: that the giraffe is agonistic and rehears pellucidness is wrong if it is not annexational.; sent17 -> int4: the Timorese is nondeductible if that it does not rehear signalman and/or it is on-site does not hold.; sent5 -> int5: if the javelin is not centesimal it impugns omen and is not a bombazine.; sent14 & sent18 -> int6: the javelin is not centesimal.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the javelin impugns omen but it is not a bombazine.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it impugns omen and it is not a bombazine.; int8 & sent13 -> int9: that the lure is not a policeman is not incorrect.; sent3 & int9 -> int10: the fitting is a kind of an otology and it roughs lure.; int10 -> int11: the fitting is an otology.; sent2 & int11 -> int12: the fact that the Timorese either does not rehear signalman or is on-site or both is not correct.; int4 & int12 -> int13: the Timorese is nondeductible.; sent15 & int13 -> int14: the caraway is deductible.; sent16 & int14 -> int15: either the retinene is not annexational or it is cinerary or both.; int15 -> int16: something is not annexational and/or it is cinerary.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the giraffe is agonistic and it does rehear pellucidness does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the giraffe is a pro. sent2: the fact that the Timorese does not rehear signalman and/or is on-site is not correct if the fitting is an otology. sent3: the fitting is a kind of an otology that does rough lure if the fact that the lure is not a policeman hold. sent4: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a turnery but calyptrate is wrong the giraffe is agonistic. sent5: a non-centesimal thing does impugn omen and is not a bombazine. sent6: the giraffe is calyptrate. sent7: the cattalo is a kind of a Seriphidium if that the giraffe is non-cinerary thing that is annexational is not true. sent8: if the giraffe is annexational it rehears pellucidness. sent9: the giraffe is annexational if there exists something such that it does rehear pellucidness. sent10: the giraffe is annexational. sent11: if the oilman is on-site it is immaterial. sent12: if something is not annexational then the fact that it is agonistic and does rehear pellucidness does not hold. sent13: the lure is not a kind of a policeman if there exists something such that it does impugn omen and is not a bombazine. sent14: the javelin is not centesimal if it does romanticize and is not a change-up. sent15: the caraway is not nondeductible if the Timorese is nondeductible. sent16: the retinene is not annexational and/or it is not non-cinerary if the caraway is not nondeductible. sent17: if the fact that something does not rehear signalman and/or it is on-site does not hold it is nondeductible. sent18: the javelin does romanticize but it is not a change-up. sent19: there is something such that that it is not a turnery but calyptrate is not true. ; $proof$ = | sent19 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the giraffe is agonistic is true.; sent8 & sent10 -> int2: the fact that the giraffe does rehear pellucidness hold.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | there is something such that that it is not a turnery but calyptrate is not true. | [
"if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a turnery but calyptrate is wrong the giraffe is agonistic.",
"if the giraffe is annexational it rehears pellucidness.",
"the giraffe is annexational."
] | [
"It is not a turnery but calyptrate is not true.",
"It is not a turnery but it is not calyptrate.",
"It is not a turnery, but calyptrate is not true."
] | It is not a turnery but it is not calyptrate. | if the giraffe is annexational it rehears pellucidness. |
the fact that the giraffe is agonistic and it does rehear pellucidness does not hold. | sent1: the giraffe is a pro. sent2: the fact that the Timorese does not rehear signalman and/or is on-site is not correct if the fitting is an otology. sent3: the fitting is a kind of an otology that does rough lure if the fact that the lure is not a policeman hold. sent4: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a turnery but calyptrate is wrong the giraffe is agonistic. sent5: a non-centesimal thing does impugn omen and is not a bombazine. sent6: the giraffe is calyptrate. sent7: the cattalo is a kind of a Seriphidium if that the giraffe is non-cinerary thing that is annexational is not true. sent8: if the giraffe is annexational it rehears pellucidness. sent9: the giraffe is annexational if there exists something such that it does rehear pellucidness. sent10: the giraffe is annexational. sent11: if the oilman is on-site it is immaterial. sent12: if something is not annexational then the fact that it is agonistic and does rehear pellucidness does not hold. sent13: the lure is not a kind of a policeman if there exists something such that it does impugn omen and is not a bombazine. sent14: the javelin is not centesimal if it does romanticize and is not a change-up. sent15: the caraway is not nondeductible if the Timorese is nondeductible. sent16: the retinene is not annexational and/or it is not non-cinerary if the caraway is not nondeductible. sent17: if the fact that something does not rehear signalman and/or it is on-site does not hold it is nondeductible. sent18: the javelin does romanticize but it is not a change-up. sent19: there is something such that that it is not a turnery but calyptrate is not true. | ¬({A}{a} & {B}{a}) | sent1: {DF}{a} sent2: {H}{e} -> ¬(¬{G}{d} v {F}{d}) sent3: ¬{J}{f} -> ({H}{e} & {I}{e}) sent4: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {A}{a} sent5: (x): ¬{M}x -> ({K}x & ¬{L}x) sent6: {AB}{a} sent7: ¬(¬{D}{a} & {C}{a}) -> {DM}{gu} sent8: {C}{a} -> {B}{a} sent9: (x): {B}x -> {C}{a} sent10: {C}{a} sent11: {F}{hd} -> {HP}{hd} sent12: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬({A}x & {B}x) sent13: (x): ({K}x & ¬{L}x) -> ¬{J}{f} sent14: ({O}{g} & ¬{N}{g}) -> ¬{M}{g} sent15: {E}{d} -> ¬{E}{c} sent16: ¬{E}{c} -> (¬{C}{b} v {D}{b}) sent17: (x): ¬(¬{G}x v {F}x) -> {E}x sent18: ({O}{g} & ¬{N}{g}) sent19: (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) | [
"sent19 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the giraffe is agonistic is true.; sent8 & sent10 -> int2: the fact that the giraffe does rehear pellucidness hold.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent19 & sent4 -> int1: {A}{a}; sent8 & sent10 -> int2: {B}{a}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 2 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 15 | the fact that the giraffe is agonistic and it rehears pellucidness is wrong. | ¬({A}{a} & {B}{a}) | 13 | [
"sent12 -> int3: that the giraffe is agonistic and rehears pellucidness is wrong if it is not annexational.; sent17 -> int4: the Timorese is nondeductible if that it does not rehear signalman and/or it is on-site does not hold.; sent5 -> int5: if the javelin is not centesimal it impugns omen and is not a bombazine.; sent14 & sent18 -> int6: the javelin is not centesimal.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the javelin impugns omen but it is not a bombazine.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it impugns omen and it is not a bombazine.; int8 & sent13 -> int9: that the lure is not a policeman is not incorrect.; sent3 & int9 -> int10: the fitting is a kind of an otology and it roughs lure.; int10 -> int11: the fitting is an otology.; sent2 & int11 -> int12: the fact that the Timorese either does not rehear signalman or is on-site or both is not correct.; int4 & int12 -> int13: the Timorese is nondeductible.; sent15 & int13 -> int14: the caraway is deductible.; sent16 & int14 -> int15: either the retinene is not annexational or it is cinerary or both.; int15 -> int16: something is not annexational and/or it is cinerary.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the giraffe is agonistic and it does rehear pellucidness does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the giraffe is a pro. sent2: the fact that the Timorese does not rehear signalman and/or is on-site is not correct if the fitting is an otology. sent3: the fitting is a kind of an otology that does rough lure if the fact that the lure is not a policeman hold. sent4: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a turnery but calyptrate is wrong the giraffe is agonistic. sent5: a non-centesimal thing does impugn omen and is not a bombazine. sent6: the giraffe is calyptrate. sent7: the cattalo is a kind of a Seriphidium if that the giraffe is non-cinerary thing that is annexational is not true. sent8: if the giraffe is annexational it rehears pellucidness. sent9: the giraffe is annexational if there exists something such that it does rehear pellucidness. sent10: the giraffe is annexational. sent11: if the oilman is on-site it is immaterial. sent12: if something is not annexational then the fact that it is agonistic and does rehear pellucidness does not hold. sent13: the lure is not a kind of a policeman if there exists something such that it does impugn omen and is not a bombazine. sent14: the javelin is not centesimal if it does romanticize and is not a change-up. sent15: the caraway is not nondeductible if the Timorese is nondeductible. sent16: the retinene is not annexational and/or it is not non-cinerary if the caraway is not nondeductible. sent17: if the fact that something does not rehear signalman and/or it is on-site does not hold it is nondeductible. sent18: the javelin does romanticize but it is not a change-up. sent19: there is something such that that it is not a turnery but calyptrate is not true. ; $proof$ = | sent19 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the giraffe is agonistic is true.; sent8 & sent10 -> int2: the fact that the giraffe does rehear pellucidness hold.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | there is something such that that it is not a turnery but calyptrate is not true. | [
"if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a turnery but calyptrate is wrong the giraffe is agonistic.",
"if the giraffe is annexational it rehears pellucidness.",
"the giraffe is annexational."
] | [
"It is not a turnery but calyptrate is not true.",
"It is not a turnery but it is not calyptrate.",
"It is not a turnery, but calyptrate is not true."
] | It is not a turnery, but calyptrate is not true. | the giraffe is annexational. |
the ownership does not occur. | sent1: the roughing Sabah does not occur. sent2: that the ownership occurs leads to either that the pacing happens or that the deep-sea does not occur or both. sent3: if the roughing Sabah does not occur that the pacing happens and/or the deep-sea does not occur does not hold. sent4: the natalness does not occur. | ¬{A} | sent1: ¬{B} sent2: {A} -> ({AA} v ¬{AB}) sent3: ¬{B} -> ¬({AA} v ¬{AB}) sent4: ¬{IM} | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ownership happens.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the pacing and/or the non-deep-seaness happens.; sent3 & sent1 -> int2: that the pacing happens and/or the deep-sea does not occur is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"void -> assump1: {A}; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: ({AA} v ¬{AB}); sent3 & sent1 -> int2: ¬({AA} v ¬{AB}); int1 & int2 -> int3: #F#; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | [] | null | null | $hypothesis$ = the ownership does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the roughing Sabah does not occur. sent2: that the ownership occurs leads to either that the pacing happens or that the deep-sea does not occur or both. sent3: if the roughing Sabah does not occur that the pacing happens and/or the deep-sea does not occur does not hold. sent4: the natalness does not occur. ; $proof$ = | void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ownership happens.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the pacing and/or the non-deep-seaness happens.; sent3 & sent1 -> int2: that the pacing happens and/or the deep-sea does not occur is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | that the ownership occurs leads to either that the pacing happens or that the deep-sea does not occur or both. | [
"if the roughing Sabah does not occur that the pacing happens and/or the deep-sea does not occur does not hold.",
"the roughing Sabah does not occur."
] | [
"Either the pacing happens or the deep-sea does not occur because of the ownership.",
"Either the pacing happens or the deep-sea doesn't occur because of the ownership."
] | Either the pacing happens or the deep-sea does not occur because of the ownership. | if the roughing Sabah does not occur that the pacing happens and/or the deep-sea does not occur does not hold. |
the ownership does not occur. | sent1: the roughing Sabah does not occur. sent2: that the ownership occurs leads to either that the pacing happens or that the deep-sea does not occur or both. sent3: if the roughing Sabah does not occur that the pacing happens and/or the deep-sea does not occur does not hold. sent4: the natalness does not occur. | ¬{A} | sent1: ¬{B} sent2: {A} -> ({AA} v ¬{AB}) sent3: ¬{B} -> ¬({AA} v ¬{AB}) sent4: ¬{IM} | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ownership happens.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the pacing and/or the non-deep-seaness happens.; sent3 & sent1 -> int2: that the pacing happens and/or the deep-sea does not occur is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"void -> assump1: {A}; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: ({AA} v ¬{AB}); sent3 & sent1 -> int2: ¬({AA} v ¬{AB}); int1 & int2 -> int3: #F#; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | [] | null | null | $hypothesis$ = the ownership does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the roughing Sabah does not occur. sent2: that the ownership occurs leads to either that the pacing happens or that the deep-sea does not occur or both. sent3: if the roughing Sabah does not occur that the pacing happens and/or the deep-sea does not occur does not hold. sent4: the natalness does not occur. ; $proof$ = | void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ownership happens.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the pacing and/or the non-deep-seaness happens.; sent3 & sent1 -> int2: that the pacing happens and/or the deep-sea does not occur is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | that the ownership occurs leads to either that the pacing happens or that the deep-sea does not occur or both. | [
"if the roughing Sabah does not occur that the pacing happens and/or the deep-sea does not occur does not hold.",
"the roughing Sabah does not occur."
] | [
"Either the pacing happens or the deep-sea does not occur because of the ownership.",
"Either the pacing happens or the deep-sea doesn't occur because of the ownership."
] | Either the pacing happens or the deep-sea doesn't occur because of the ownership. | the roughing Sabah does not occur. |
that the agglutinogen does not impugn affix and is a moral is wrong. | sent1: the thiazide is a putter that does impugn guitarist if there exists something such that the fact that it does not diffuse is true. sent2: if the fact that something brachiates and it is intrusive is wrong it does not brachiates. sent3: the zoomastigote is not a litterbin if that it does not impugn IR and/or it does ripen bolster does not hold. sent4: the zoomastigote is not fibrocalcific. sent5: there exists something such that it does not impugn inferiority and is not propulsive. sent6: the fact that the tributyrin does brachiate and it is intrusive is wrong if the storyteller does not impugn guitarist. sent7: if the zoomastigote is not a litterbin and it is not fibrocalcific the leeway does not diffuse. sent8: the tributyrin is not opportune if something that does not impugn inferiority is not propulsive. sent9: the fact that the zoomastigote does not impugn IR and/or it ripens bolster does not hold. sent10: if the thiazide is a kind of a putter and it does impugn guitarist then the storyteller does not impugn guitarist. sent11: that something does not impugn affix but it is a kind of a moral is false if it is not opportune. sent12: if the tributyrin is not opportune the agglutinogen does not impugn affix and is moral. sent13: there is something such that the fact that it does not impugn inferiority hold. sent14: if something is opportune then it is both not audio-lingual and an impressionist. sent15: the tributyrin is not opportune if something does impugn inferiority and is not propulsive. | ¬(¬{B}{b} & {C}{b}) | sent1: (x): ¬{I}x -> ({H}{d} & {F}{d}) sent2: (x): ¬({D}x & {G}x) -> ¬{D}x sent3: ¬(¬{L}{f} v {M}{f}) -> ¬{J}{f} sent4: ¬{K}{f} sent5: (Ex): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent6: ¬{F}{c} -> ¬({D}{a} & {G}{a}) sent7: (¬{J}{f} & ¬{K}{f}) -> ¬{I}{e} sent8: (x): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{A}{a} sent9: ¬(¬{L}{f} v {M}{f}) sent10: ({H}{d} & {F}{d}) -> ¬{F}{c} sent11: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{B}x & {C}x) sent12: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{B}{b} & {C}{b}) sent13: (Ex): ¬{AA}x sent14: (x): {A}x -> (¬{CA}x & {CS}x) sent15: (x): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{A}{a} | [
"sent5 & sent8 -> int1: the tributyrin is not opportune.; sent12 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent5 & sent8 -> int1: ¬{A}{a}; sent12 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 2 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 12 | the fact that the agglutinogen does not impugn affix and is a moral is incorrect. | ¬(¬{B}{b} & {C}{b}) | 12 | [
"sent11 -> int2: if the agglutinogen is not opportune then the fact that the fact that it does not impugn affix and it is a moral is not incorrect is not right.; sent2 -> int3: the tributyrin does not brachiate if that it does brachiate and is intrusive is not right.; sent3 & sent9 -> int4: the zoomastigote is not a litterbin.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the zoomastigote is not a litterbin and is non-fibrocalcific.; sent7 & int5 -> int6: the leeway does not diffuse.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it does not diffuse.; int7 & sent1 -> int8: the thiazide does putter and it does impugn guitarist.; sent10 & int8 -> int9: the storyteller does not impugn guitarist.; sent6 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the tributyrin brachiates and it is intrusive is wrong.; int3 & int10 -> int11: the tributyrin does not brachiate.; int11 -> int12: the fact that the tributyrin impugns Chihuahua or it does not brachiate or both is correct.; int12 -> int13: something either impugns Chihuahua or does not brachiate or both.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that the agglutinogen does not impugn affix and is a moral is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the thiazide is a putter that does impugn guitarist if there exists something such that the fact that it does not diffuse is true. sent2: if the fact that something brachiates and it is intrusive is wrong it does not brachiates. sent3: the zoomastigote is not a litterbin if that it does not impugn IR and/or it does ripen bolster does not hold. sent4: the zoomastigote is not fibrocalcific. sent5: there exists something such that it does not impugn inferiority and is not propulsive. sent6: the fact that the tributyrin does brachiate and it is intrusive is wrong if the storyteller does not impugn guitarist. sent7: if the zoomastigote is not a litterbin and it is not fibrocalcific the leeway does not diffuse. sent8: the tributyrin is not opportune if something that does not impugn inferiority is not propulsive. sent9: the fact that the zoomastigote does not impugn IR and/or it ripens bolster does not hold. sent10: if the thiazide is a kind of a putter and it does impugn guitarist then the storyteller does not impugn guitarist. sent11: that something does not impugn affix but it is a kind of a moral is false if it is not opportune. sent12: if the tributyrin is not opportune the agglutinogen does not impugn affix and is moral. sent13: there is something such that the fact that it does not impugn inferiority hold. sent14: if something is opportune then it is both not audio-lingual and an impressionist. sent15: the tributyrin is not opportune if something does impugn inferiority and is not propulsive. ; $proof$ = | sent5 & sent8 -> int1: the tributyrin is not opportune.; sent12 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | there exists something such that it does not impugn inferiority and is not propulsive. | [
"the tributyrin is not opportune if something that does not impugn inferiority is not propulsive.",
"if the tributyrin is not opportune the agglutinogen does not impugn affix and is moral."
] | [
"There is something that does not impugn inferiority and is not propulsive.",
"There is a thing that does not impugn inferiority and is not propulsive."
] | There is something that does not impugn inferiority and is not propulsive. | the tributyrin is not opportune if something that does not impugn inferiority is not propulsive. |
that the agglutinogen does not impugn affix and is a moral is wrong. | sent1: the thiazide is a putter that does impugn guitarist if there exists something such that the fact that it does not diffuse is true. sent2: if the fact that something brachiates and it is intrusive is wrong it does not brachiates. sent3: the zoomastigote is not a litterbin if that it does not impugn IR and/or it does ripen bolster does not hold. sent4: the zoomastigote is not fibrocalcific. sent5: there exists something such that it does not impugn inferiority and is not propulsive. sent6: the fact that the tributyrin does brachiate and it is intrusive is wrong if the storyteller does not impugn guitarist. sent7: if the zoomastigote is not a litterbin and it is not fibrocalcific the leeway does not diffuse. sent8: the tributyrin is not opportune if something that does not impugn inferiority is not propulsive. sent9: the fact that the zoomastigote does not impugn IR and/or it ripens bolster does not hold. sent10: if the thiazide is a kind of a putter and it does impugn guitarist then the storyteller does not impugn guitarist. sent11: that something does not impugn affix but it is a kind of a moral is false if it is not opportune. sent12: if the tributyrin is not opportune the agglutinogen does not impugn affix and is moral. sent13: there is something such that the fact that it does not impugn inferiority hold. sent14: if something is opportune then it is both not audio-lingual and an impressionist. sent15: the tributyrin is not opportune if something does impugn inferiority and is not propulsive. | ¬(¬{B}{b} & {C}{b}) | sent1: (x): ¬{I}x -> ({H}{d} & {F}{d}) sent2: (x): ¬({D}x & {G}x) -> ¬{D}x sent3: ¬(¬{L}{f} v {M}{f}) -> ¬{J}{f} sent4: ¬{K}{f} sent5: (Ex): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent6: ¬{F}{c} -> ¬({D}{a} & {G}{a}) sent7: (¬{J}{f} & ¬{K}{f}) -> ¬{I}{e} sent8: (x): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{A}{a} sent9: ¬(¬{L}{f} v {M}{f}) sent10: ({H}{d} & {F}{d}) -> ¬{F}{c} sent11: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{B}x & {C}x) sent12: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{B}{b} & {C}{b}) sent13: (Ex): ¬{AA}x sent14: (x): {A}x -> (¬{CA}x & {CS}x) sent15: (x): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{A}{a} | [
"sent5 & sent8 -> int1: the tributyrin is not opportune.; sent12 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent5 & sent8 -> int1: ¬{A}{a}; sent12 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 2 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 12 | the fact that the agglutinogen does not impugn affix and is a moral is incorrect. | ¬(¬{B}{b} & {C}{b}) | 12 | [
"sent11 -> int2: if the agglutinogen is not opportune then the fact that the fact that it does not impugn affix and it is a moral is not incorrect is not right.; sent2 -> int3: the tributyrin does not brachiate if that it does brachiate and is intrusive is not right.; sent3 & sent9 -> int4: the zoomastigote is not a litterbin.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the zoomastigote is not a litterbin and is non-fibrocalcific.; sent7 & int5 -> int6: the leeway does not diffuse.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it does not diffuse.; int7 & sent1 -> int8: the thiazide does putter and it does impugn guitarist.; sent10 & int8 -> int9: the storyteller does not impugn guitarist.; sent6 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the tributyrin brachiates and it is intrusive is wrong.; int3 & int10 -> int11: the tributyrin does not brachiate.; int11 -> int12: the fact that the tributyrin impugns Chihuahua or it does not brachiate or both is correct.; int12 -> int13: something either impugns Chihuahua or does not brachiate or both.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that the agglutinogen does not impugn affix and is a moral is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the thiazide is a putter that does impugn guitarist if there exists something such that the fact that it does not diffuse is true. sent2: if the fact that something brachiates and it is intrusive is wrong it does not brachiates. sent3: the zoomastigote is not a litterbin if that it does not impugn IR and/or it does ripen bolster does not hold. sent4: the zoomastigote is not fibrocalcific. sent5: there exists something such that it does not impugn inferiority and is not propulsive. sent6: the fact that the tributyrin does brachiate and it is intrusive is wrong if the storyteller does not impugn guitarist. sent7: if the zoomastigote is not a litterbin and it is not fibrocalcific the leeway does not diffuse. sent8: the tributyrin is not opportune if something that does not impugn inferiority is not propulsive. sent9: the fact that the zoomastigote does not impugn IR and/or it ripens bolster does not hold. sent10: if the thiazide is a kind of a putter and it does impugn guitarist then the storyteller does not impugn guitarist. sent11: that something does not impugn affix but it is a kind of a moral is false if it is not opportune. sent12: if the tributyrin is not opportune the agglutinogen does not impugn affix and is moral. sent13: there is something such that the fact that it does not impugn inferiority hold. sent14: if something is opportune then it is both not audio-lingual and an impressionist. sent15: the tributyrin is not opportune if something does impugn inferiority and is not propulsive. ; $proof$ = | sent5 & sent8 -> int1: the tributyrin is not opportune.; sent12 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | there exists something such that it does not impugn inferiority and is not propulsive. | [
"the tributyrin is not opportune if something that does not impugn inferiority is not propulsive.",
"if the tributyrin is not opportune the agglutinogen does not impugn affix and is moral."
] | [
"There is something that does not impugn inferiority and is not propulsive.",
"There is a thing that does not impugn inferiority and is not propulsive."
] | There is a thing that does not impugn inferiority and is not propulsive. | if the tributyrin is not opportune the agglutinogen does not impugn affix and is moral. |
the ordination happens. | sent1: if the rehearing divan happens the ordination happens. sent2: if the rehearing Houston does not occur then the leprousness does not occur and the unfairness does not occur. sent3: if the fact that the ordination does not occur is correct then the fact that both the non-southernness and the non-choricness happens is not true. sent4: if the fact that that both the non-southernness and the non-choricness happens hold is not right the undatableness occurs. sent5: the lifework happens. sent6: the rehearing divan is triggered by that the southernness occurs. sent7: if the fact that the leprousness does not occur hold then the faro and the rehearing divan happens. sent8: that the anecdote does not occur brings about that the reversible does not occur and the ordination does not occur. sent9: the choricness occurs. sent10: if the lifework and the golfing happens the rehearing Houston does not occur. sent11: if the fact that the ordination and the choricness occurs is wrong the ordination does not occur. sent12: the southernness happens and the choricness occurs. sent13: the impugning Aegean occurs. sent14: that the ordination occurs and the choricness occurs is incorrect if the southernness does not occur. | {D} | sent1: {C} -> {D} sent2: ¬{H} -> (¬{E} & ¬{F}) sent3: ¬{D} -> ¬(¬{A} & ¬{B}) sent4: ¬(¬{A} & ¬{B}) -> {GA} sent5: {I} sent6: {A} -> {C} sent7: ¬{E} -> ({FO} & {C}) sent8: ¬{K} -> (¬{G} & ¬{D}) sent9: {B} sent10: ({I} & {J}) -> ¬{H} sent11: ¬({D} & {B}) -> ¬{D} sent12: ({A} & {B}) sent13: {M} sent14: ¬{A} -> ¬({D} & {B}) | [
"sent12 -> int1: the southernness occurs.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the rehearing divan occurs.; sent1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent12 -> int1: {A}; sent6 & int1 -> int2: {C}; sent1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 3 | 3 | 11 | 0 | 11 | both the undatableness and the faro happens. | ({GA} & {FO}) | 7 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the ordination happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the rehearing divan happens the ordination happens. sent2: if the rehearing Houston does not occur then the leprousness does not occur and the unfairness does not occur. sent3: if the fact that the ordination does not occur is correct then the fact that both the non-southernness and the non-choricness happens is not true. sent4: if the fact that that both the non-southernness and the non-choricness happens hold is not right the undatableness occurs. sent5: the lifework happens. sent6: the rehearing divan is triggered by that the southernness occurs. sent7: if the fact that the leprousness does not occur hold then the faro and the rehearing divan happens. sent8: that the anecdote does not occur brings about that the reversible does not occur and the ordination does not occur. sent9: the choricness occurs. sent10: if the lifework and the golfing happens the rehearing Houston does not occur. sent11: if the fact that the ordination and the choricness occurs is wrong the ordination does not occur. sent12: the southernness happens and the choricness occurs. sent13: the impugning Aegean occurs. sent14: that the ordination occurs and the choricness occurs is incorrect if the southernness does not occur. ; $proof$ = | sent12 -> int1: the southernness occurs.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the rehearing divan occurs.; sent1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the southernness happens and the choricness occurs. | [
"the rehearing divan is triggered by that the southernness occurs.",
"if the rehearing divan happens the ordination happens."
] | [
"The southernness and the choricness occur.",
"The southernness and the choricness happen."
] | The southernness and the choricness occur. | the rehearing divan is triggered by that the southernness occurs. |
the ordination happens. | sent1: if the rehearing divan happens the ordination happens. sent2: if the rehearing Houston does not occur then the leprousness does not occur and the unfairness does not occur. sent3: if the fact that the ordination does not occur is correct then the fact that both the non-southernness and the non-choricness happens is not true. sent4: if the fact that that both the non-southernness and the non-choricness happens hold is not right the undatableness occurs. sent5: the lifework happens. sent6: the rehearing divan is triggered by that the southernness occurs. sent7: if the fact that the leprousness does not occur hold then the faro and the rehearing divan happens. sent8: that the anecdote does not occur brings about that the reversible does not occur and the ordination does not occur. sent9: the choricness occurs. sent10: if the lifework and the golfing happens the rehearing Houston does not occur. sent11: if the fact that the ordination and the choricness occurs is wrong the ordination does not occur. sent12: the southernness happens and the choricness occurs. sent13: the impugning Aegean occurs. sent14: that the ordination occurs and the choricness occurs is incorrect if the southernness does not occur. | {D} | sent1: {C} -> {D} sent2: ¬{H} -> (¬{E} & ¬{F}) sent3: ¬{D} -> ¬(¬{A} & ¬{B}) sent4: ¬(¬{A} & ¬{B}) -> {GA} sent5: {I} sent6: {A} -> {C} sent7: ¬{E} -> ({FO} & {C}) sent8: ¬{K} -> (¬{G} & ¬{D}) sent9: {B} sent10: ({I} & {J}) -> ¬{H} sent11: ¬({D} & {B}) -> ¬{D} sent12: ({A} & {B}) sent13: {M} sent14: ¬{A} -> ¬({D} & {B}) | [
"sent12 -> int1: the southernness occurs.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the rehearing divan occurs.; sent1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent12 -> int1: {A}; sent6 & int1 -> int2: {C}; sent1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 3 | 3 | 11 | 0 | 11 | both the undatableness and the faro happens. | ({GA} & {FO}) | 7 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the ordination happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the rehearing divan happens the ordination happens. sent2: if the rehearing Houston does not occur then the leprousness does not occur and the unfairness does not occur. sent3: if the fact that the ordination does not occur is correct then the fact that both the non-southernness and the non-choricness happens is not true. sent4: if the fact that that both the non-southernness and the non-choricness happens hold is not right the undatableness occurs. sent5: the lifework happens. sent6: the rehearing divan is triggered by that the southernness occurs. sent7: if the fact that the leprousness does not occur hold then the faro and the rehearing divan happens. sent8: that the anecdote does not occur brings about that the reversible does not occur and the ordination does not occur. sent9: the choricness occurs. sent10: if the lifework and the golfing happens the rehearing Houston does not occur. sent11: if the fact that the ordination and the choricness occurs is wrong the ordination does not occur. sent12: the southernness happens and the choricness occurs. sent13: the impugning Aegean occurs. sent14: that the ordination occurs and the choricness occurs is incorrect if the southernness does not occur. ; $proof$ = | sent12 -> int1: the southernness occurs.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the rehearing divan occurs.; sent1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the southernness happens and the choricness occurs. | [
"the rehearing divan is triggered by that the southernness occurs.",
"if the rehearing divan happens the ordination happens."
] | [
"The southernness and the choricness occur.",
"The southernness and the choricness happen."
] | The southernness and the choricness happen. | if the rehearing divan happens the ordination happens. |
the punctilio does not occur. | sent1: the burdening does not occur. sent2: the acetonicness happens and the burdening does not occur. sent3: that the acidicness does not occur and the roughing Orono does not occur is brought about by that the perinealness occurs. sent4: the perinealness occurs and the rehearing T-man happens if the stunner does not occur. sent5: either the perinealness occurs or the rehearing T-man does not occur or both. sent6: that the roughing Orono happens yields that the ophthalmicness occurs but the laryngospasm does not occur. sent7: the impugning sorbent occurs if the faithfulness occurs. sent8: the impugning sorbent yields that the confidentness occurs but the stunner does not occur. sent9: if the iteration occurs the punctilio occurs. sent10: if the acetonicness happens and the burdening does not occur the fact that the iteration happens is not wrong. sent11: that the acetonicness occurs and the burden happens yields that the iteration happens. sent12: the non-ophthalmicness brings about that the punctilio does not occur and the iteration does not occur. sent13: if the acidicness does not occur the ophthalmicness does not occur. | ¬{A} | sent1: ¬{AB} sent2: ({AA} & ¬{AB}) sent3: {F} -> (¬{D} & ¬{E}) sent4: ¬{H} -> ({F} & {G}) sent5: ({F} v ¬{G}) sent6: {E} -> ({C} & ¬{S}) sent7: {K} -> {J} sent8: {J} -> ({I} & ¬{H}) sent9: {B} -> {A} sent10: ({AA} & ¬{AB}) -> {B} sent11: ({AA} & {AB}) -> {B} sent12: ¬{C} -> (¬{A} & ¬{B}) sent13: ¬{D} -> ¬{C} | [
"sent10 & sent2 -> int1: the iteration happens.; sent9 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent10 & sent2 -> int1: {B}; sent9 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 2 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 10 | the countermand but not the laryngospasm occurs. | ({HI} & ¬{S}) | 4 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the punctilio does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the burdening does not occur. sent2: the acetonicness happens and the burdening does not occur. sent3: that the acidicness does not occur and the roughing Orono does not occur is brought about by that the perinealness occurs. sent4: the perinealness occurs and the rehearing T-man happens if the stunner does not occur. sent5: either the perinealness occurs or the rehearing T-man does not occur or both. sent6: that the roughing Orono happens yields that the ophthalmicness occurs but the laryngospasm does not occur. sent7: the impugning sorbent occurs if the faithfulness occurs. sent8: the impugning sorbent yields that the confidentness occurs but the stunner does not occur. sent9: if the iteration occurs the punctilio occurs. sent10: if the acetonicness happens and the burdening does not occur the fact that the iteration happens is not wrong. sent11: that the acetonicness occurs and the burden happens yields that the iteration happens. sent12: the non-ophthalmicness brings about that the punctilio does not occur and the iteration does not occur. sent13: if the acidicness does not occur the ophthalmicness does not occur. ; $proof$ = | sent10 & sent2 -> int1: the iteration happens.; sent9 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | if the acetonicness happens and the burdening does not occur the fact that the iteration happens is not wrong. | [
"the acetonicness happens and the burdening does not occur.",
"if the iteration occurs the punctilio occurs."
] | [
"The fact that the iteration happens is not wrong if the acetonicness happens.",
"The fact that the iteration happens is not wrong if the acetonicness happens and the burdening doesn't."
] | The fact that the iteration happens is not wrong if the acetonicness happens. | the acetonicness happens and the burdening does not occur. |
the punctilio does not occur. | sent1: the burdening does not occur. sent2: the acetonicness happens and the burdening does not occur. sent3: that the acidicness does not occur and the roughing Orono does not occur is brought about by that the perinealness occurs. sent4: the perinealness occurs and the rehearing T-man happens if the stunner does not occur. sent5: either the perinealness occurs or the rehearing T-man does not occur or both. sent6: that the roughing Orono happens yields that the ophthalmicness occurs but the laryngospasm does not occur. sent7: the impugning sorbent occurs if the faithfulness occurs. sent8: the impugning sorbent yields that the confidentness occurs but the stunner does not occur. sent9: if the iteration occurs the punctilio occurs. sent10: if the acetonicness happens and the burdening does not occur the fact that the iteration happens is not wrong. sent11: that the acetonicness occurs and the burden happens yields that the iteration happens. sent12: the non-ophthalmicness brings about that the punctilio does not occur and the iteration does not occur. sent13: if the acidicness does not occur the ophthalmicness does not occur. | ¬{A} | sent1: ¬{AB} sent2: ({AA} & ¬{AB}) sent3: {F} -> (¬{D} & ¬{E}) sent4: ¬{H} -> ({F} & {G}) sent5: ({F} v ¬{G}) sent6: {E} -> ({C} & ¬{S}) sent7: {K} -> {J} sent8: {J} -> ({I} & ¬{H}) sent9: {B} -> {A} sent10: ({AA} & ¬{AB}) -> {B} sent11: ({AA} & {AB}) -> {B} sent12: ¬{C} -> (¬{A} & ¬{B}) sent13: ¬{D} -> ¬{C} | [
"sent10 & sent2 -> int1: the iteration happens.; sent9 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent10 & sent2 -> int1: {B}; sent9 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 2 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 10 | the countermand but not the laryngospasm occurs. | ({HI} & ¬{S}) | 4 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the punctilio does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the burdening does not occur. sent2: the acetonicness happens and the burdening does not occur. sent3: that the acidicness does not occur and the roughing Orono does not occur is brought about by that the perinealness occurs. sent4: the perinealness occurs and the rehearing T-man happens if the stunner does not occur. sent5: either the perinealness occurs or the rehearing T-man does not occur or both. sent6: that the roughing Orono happens yields that the ophthalmicness occurs but the laryngospasm does not occur. sent7: the impugning sorbent occurs if the faithfulness occurs. sent8: the impugning sorbent yields that the confidentness occurs but the stunner does not occur. sent9: if the iteration occurs the punctilio occurs. sent10: if the acetonicness happens and the burdening does not occur the fact that the iteration happens is not wrong. sent11: that the acetonicness occurs and the burden happens yields that the iteration happens. sent12: the non-ophthalmicness brings about that the punctilio does not occur and the iteration does not occur. sent13: if the acidicness does not occur the ophthalmicness does not occur. ; $proof$ = | sent10 & sent2 -> int1: the iteration happens.; sent9 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | if the acetonicness happens and the burdening does not occur the fact that the iteration happens is not wrong. | [
"the acetonicness happens and the burdening does not occur.",
"if the iteration occurs the punctilio occurs."
] | [
"The fact that the iteration happens is not wrong if the acetonicness happens.",
"The fact that the iteration happens is not wrong if the acetonicness happens and the burdening doesn't."
] | The fact that the iteration happens is not wrong if the acetonicness happens and the burdening doesn't. | if the iteration occurs the punctilio occurs. |
the fact that the Freon is not a Muztag is not false. | sent1: something does not crystallize if the fact that it is not a Muztag and it is not corinthian is not true. sent2: the shanny is a Guyanese. sent3: the Freon is non-Guyanese if it is a kind of a Muztag and does not rough dandruff. sent4: if something is a tambour but it is not Kiplingesque then it does not rough dandruff. sent5: the fact that the shanny is a tambour but not Kiplingesque is not incorrect if it is a Guyanese. sent6: if the shanny is a Guyanese it is a tambour. sent7: if the shanny does not rough dandruff then that the Freon does not rough dandruff and it is not appendicular is not true. sent8: something is not a Muztag if it does rough dandruff. sent9: the fact that the dandruff is both an avalanche and a formalization does not hold. | ¬{A}{a} | sent1: (x): ¬(¬{A}x & ¬{GJ}x) -> ¬{BH}x sent2: {D}{aa} sent3: ({A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> ¬{D}{a} sent4: (x): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent5: {D}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent6: {D}{aa} -> {AA}{aa} sent7: ¬{B}{aa} -> ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent8: (x): {B}x -> ¬{A}x sent9: ¬({E}{d} & {F}{d}) | [
"sent4 -> int1: if that the shanny is a tambour but not Kiplingesque hold then it does not rough dandruff.; sent5 & sent2 -> int2: the shanny is a tambour and not Kiplingesque.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the shanny does not rough dandruff.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the fact that the Freon does not rough dandruff and is not appendicular is wrong.;"
] | UNKNOWN | [
"sent4 -> int1: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa}; sent5 & sent2 -> int2: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}); int1 & int2 -> int3: ¬{B}{aa}; int3 & sent7 -> int4: ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a});"
] | UNKNOWN | 4 | null | 5 | 0 | 5 | if the fact that that the shanny is not a Muztag and it is not corinthian is false is not wrong then it does not crystallize. | ¬(¬{A}{aa} & ¬{GJ}{aa}) -> ¬{BH}{aa} | 1 | [
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the Freon is not a Muztag is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not crystallize if the fact that it is not a Muztag and it is not corinthian is not true. sent2: the shanny is a Guyanese. sent3: the Freon is non-Guyanese if it is a kind of a Muztag and does not rough dandruff. sent4: if something is a tambour but it is not Kiplingesque then it does not rough dandruff. sent5: the fact that the shanny is a tambour but not Kiplingesque is not incorrect if it is a Guyanese. sent6: if the shanny is a Guyanese it is a tambour. sent7: if the shanny does not rough dandruff then that the Freon does not rough dandruff and it is not appendicular is not true. sent8: something is not a Muztag if it does rough dandruff. sent9: the fact that the dandruff is both an avalanche and a formalization does not hold. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | if something is a tambour but it is not Kiplingesque then it does not rough dandruff. | [
"the fact that the shanny is a tambour but not Kiplingesque is not incorrect if it is a Guyanese.",
"the shanny is a Guyanese.",
"if the shanny does not rough dandruff then that the Freon does not rough dandruff and it is not appendicular is not true."
] | [
"If a tambour is not Kiplingesque then it does not rough up the skin.",
"If a tambour is not Kiplingesque, then it does not rough up the skin.",
"If a tambour is not Kiplingesque then it doesn't rough up the skin."
] | If a tambour is not Kiplingesque then it does not rough up the skin. | the fact that the shanny is a tambour but not Kiplingesque is not incorrect if it is a Guyanese. |
the fact that the Freon is not a Muztag is not false. | sent1: something does not crystallize if the fact that it is not a Muztag and it is not corinthian is not true. sent2: the shanny is a Guyanese. sent3: the Freon is non-Guyanese if it is a kind of a Muztag and does not rough dandruff. sent4: if something is a tambour but it is not Kiplingesque then it does not rough dandruff. sent5: the fact that the shanny is a tambour but not Kiplingesque is not incorrect if it is a Guyanese. sent6: if the shanny is a Guyanese it is a tambour. sent7: if the shanny does not rough dandruff then that the Freon does not rough dandruff and it is not appendicular is not true. sent8: something is not a Muztag if it does rough dandruff. sent9: the fact that the dandruff is both an avalanche and a formalization does not hold. | ¬{A}{a} | sent1: (x): ¬(¬{A}x & ¬{GJ}x) -> ¬{BH}x sent2: {D}{aa} sent3: ({A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> ¬{D}{a} sent4: (x): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent5: {D}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent6: {D}{aa} -> {AA}{aa} sent7: ¬{B}{aa} -> ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent8: (x): {B}x -> ¬{A}x sent9: ¬({E}{d} & {F}{d}) | [
"sent4 -> int1: if that the shanny is a tambour but not Kiplingesque hold then it does not rough dandruff.; sent5 & sent2 -> int2: the shanny is a tambour and not Kiplingesque.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the shanny does not rough dandruff.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the fact that the Freon does not rough dandruff and is not appendicular is wrong.;"
] | UNKNOWN | [
"sent4 -> int1: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa}; sent5 & sent2 -> int2: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}); int1 & int2 -> int3: ¬{B}{aa}; int3 & sent7 -> int4: ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a});"
] | UNKNOWN | 4 | null | 5 | 0 | 5 | if the fact that that the shanny is not a Muztag and it is not corinthian is false is not wrong then it does not crystallize. | ¬(¬{A}{aa} & ¬{GJ}{aa}) -> ¬{BH}{aa} | 1 | [
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the Freon is not a Muztag is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not crystallize if the fact that it is not a Muztag and it is not corinthian is not true. sent2: the shanny is a Guyanese. sent3: the Freon is non-Guyanese if it is a kind of a Muztag and does not rough dandruff. sent4: if something is a tambour but it is not Kiplingesque then it does not rough dandruff. sent5: the fact that the shanny is a tambour but not Kiplingesque is not incorrect if it is a Guyanese. sent6: if the shanny is a Guyanese it is a tambour. sent7: if the shanny does not rough dandruff then that the Freon does not rough dandruff and it is not appendicular is not true. sent8: something is not a Muztag if it does rough dandruff. sent9: the fact that the dandruff is both an avalanche and a formalization does not hold. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | if something is a tambour but it is not Kiplingesque then it does not rough dandruff. | [
"the fact that the shanny is a tambour but not Kiplingesque is not incorrect if it is a Guyanese.",
"the shanny is a Guyanese.",
"if the shanny does not rough dandruff then that the Freon does not rough dandruff and it is not appendicular is not true."
] | [
"If a tambour is not Kiplingesque then it does not rough up the skin.",
"If a tambour is not Kiplingesque, then it does not rough up the skin.",
"If a tambour is not Kiplingesque then it doesn't rough up the skin."
] | If a tambour is not Kiplingesque, then it does not rough up the skin. | the shanny is a Guyanese. |
the fact that the Freon is not a Muztag is not false. | sent1: something does not crystallize if the fact that it is not a Muztag and it is not corinthian is not true. sent2: the shanny is a Guyanese. sent3: the Freon is non-Guyanese if it is a kind of a Muztag and does not rough dandruff. sent4: if something is a tambour but it is not Kiplingesque then it does not rough dandruff. sent5: the fact that the shanny is a tambour but not Kiplingesque is not incorrect if it is a Guyanese. sent6: if the shanny is a Guyanese it is a tambour. sent7: if the shanny does not rough dandruff then that the Freon does not rough dandruff and it is not appendicular is not true. sent8: something is not a Muztag if it does rough dandruff. sent9: the fact that the dandruff is both an avalanche and a formalization does not hold. | ¬{A}{a} | sent1: (x): ¬(¬{A}x & ¬{GJ}x) -> ¬{BH}x sent2: {D}{aa} sent3: ({A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> ¬{D}{a} sent4: (x): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent5: {D}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent6: {D}{aa} -> {AA}{aa} sent7: ¬{B}{aa} -> ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent8: (x): {B}x -> ¬{A}x sent9: ¬({E}{d} & {F}{d}) | [
"sent4 -> int1: if that the shanny is a tambour but not Kiplingesque hold then it does not rough dandruff.; sent5 & sent2 -> int2: the shanny is a tambour and not Kiplingesque.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the shanny does not rough dandruff.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the fact that the Freon does not rough dandruff and is not appendicular is wrong.;"
] | UNKNOWN | [
"sent4 -> int1: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa}; sent5 & sent2 -> int2: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}); int1 & int2 -> int3: ¬{B}{aa}; int3 & sent7 -> int4: ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a});"
] | UNKNOWN | 4 | null | 5 | 0 | 5 | if the fact that that the shanny is not a Muztag and it is not corinthian is false is not wrong then it does not crystallize. | ¬(¬{A}{aa} & ¬{GJ}{aa}) -> ¬{BH}{aa} | 1 | [
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the Freon is not a Muztag is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not crystallize if the fact that it is not a Muztag and it is not corinthian is not true. sent2: the shanny is a Guyanese. sent3: the Freon is non-Guyanese if it is a kind of a Muztag and does not rough dandruff. sent4: if something is a tambour but it is not Kiplingesque then it does not rough dandruff. sent5: the fact that the shanny is a tambour but not Kiplingesque is not incorrect if it is a Guyanese. sent6: if the shanny is a Guyanese it is a tambour. sent7: if the shanny does not rough dandruff then that the Freon does not rough dandruff and it is not appendicular is not true. sent8: something is not a Muztag if it does rough dandruff. sent9: the fact that the dandruff is both an avalanche and a formalization does not hold. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | if something is a tambour but it is not Kiplingesque then it does not rough dandruff. | [
"the fact that the shanny is a tambour but not Kiplingesque is not incorrect if it is a Guyanese.",
"the shanny is a Guyanese.",
"if the shanny does not rough dandruff then that the Freon does not rough dandruff and it is not appendicular is not true."
] | [
"If a tambour is not Kiplingesque then it does not rough up the skin.",
"If a tambour is not Kiplingesque, then it does not rough up the skin.",
"If a tambour is not Kiplingesque then it doesn't rough up the skin."
] | If a tambour is not Kiplingesque then it doesn't rough up the skin. | if the shanny does not rough dandruff then that the Freon does not rough dandruff and it is not appendicular is not true. |
the pomade is not socioeconomic. | sent1: if the victimizer is commons but it is not linguistic then the fact that the pomade is socioeconomic hold. sent2: the pomade is socioeconomic if the victimizer is commons and it is linguistic. sent3: something does not ripen IDP if it does not droop. sent4: if the victimizer is not calyptrate then it is a kind of commons thing that is not linguistic. sent5: that the pomade rationalizes and does droop is false if it does not premeditate. sent6: the pomade is not socioeconomic if the fact that the victimizer is not calyptrate and is not socioeconomic is not right. sent7: if the fact that something does rationalize and it droops is not true it does not ripen IDP. sent8: the victimizer is not linguistic. sent9: if something does not ripen IDP then the fact that either it is socioeconomic or it is not calyptrate or both hold. sent10: the victimizer is not linguistic if the fact that it is not calyptrate is not incorrect. sent11: the silverpoint is socioeconomic and is not a kind of a weekday. sent12: the victimizer is not calyptrate. sent13: that the victimizer is noncomprehensive is right. sent14: if something does not ripen IDP the fact that it is both not calyptrate and not socioeconomic is not correct. | ¬{B}{b} | sent1: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} sent2: ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} sent3: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬{C}x sent4: ¬{A}{a} -> ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent5: ¬{F}{b} -> ¬({E}{b} & {D}{b}) sent6: ¬(¬{A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} sent7: (x): ¬({E}x & {D}x) -> ¬{C}x sent8: ¬{AB}{a} sent9: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({B}x v ¬{A}x) sent10: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{AB}{a} sent11: ({B}{ge} & ¬{ES}{ge}) sent12: ¬{A}{a} sent13: {HR}{a} sent14: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & ¬{B}x) | [
"sent4 & sent12 -> int1: the victimizer is commons but it is not linguistic.; sent1 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent4 & sent12 -> int1: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}); sent1 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 2 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 11 | the pomade is not socioeconomic. | ¬{B}{b} | 6 | [
"sent14 -> int2: the fact that the victimizer is non-calyptrate and it is not socioeconomic is false if the fact that it does not ripen IDP is not false.; sent3 -> int3: that the victimizer does not ripen IDP is true if it does not droop.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the pomade is not socioeconomic. ; $context$ = sent1: if the victimizer is commons but it is not linguistic then the fact that the pomade is socioeconomic hold. sent2: the pomade is socioeconomic if the victimizer is commons and it is linguistic. sent3: something does not ripen IDP if it does not droop. sent4: if the victimizer is not calyptrate then it is a kind of commons thing that is not linguistic. sent5: that the pomade rationalizes and does droop is false if it does not premeditate. sent6: the pomade is not socioeconomic if the fact that the victimizer is not calyptrate and is not socioeconomic is not right. sent7: if the fact that something does rationalize and it droops is not true it does not ripen IDP. sent8: the victimizer is not linguistic. sent9: if something does not ripen IDP then the fact that either it is socioeconomic or it is not calyptrate or both hold. sent10: the victimizer is not linguistic if the fact that it is not calyptrate is not incorrect. sent11: the silverpoint is socioeconomic and is not a kind of a weekday. sent12: the victimizer is not calyptrate. sent13: that the victimizer is noncomprehensive is right. sent14: if something does not ripen IDP the fact that it is both not calyptrate and not socioeconomic is not correct. ; $proof$ = | sent4 & sent12 -> int1: the victimizer is commons but it is not linguistic.; sent1 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | if the victimizer is not calyptrate then it is a kind of commons thing that is not linguistic. | [
"the victimizer is not calyptrate.",
"if the victimizer is commons but it is not linguistic then the fact that the pomade is socioeconomic hold."
] | [
"It is a kind of commons thing that is not linguistic if the victimizer is not calyptrate.",
"The victimizer is not linguistic if it is not calyptrate."
] | It is a kind of commons thing that is not linguistic if the victimizer is not calyptrate. | the victimizer is not calyptrate. |
the pomade is not socioeconomic. | sent1: if the victimizer is commons but it is not linguistic then the fact that the pomade is socioeconomic hold. sent2: the pomade is socioeconomic if the victimizer is commons and it is linguistic. sent3: something does not ripen IDP if it does not droop. sent4: if the victimizer is not calyptrate then it is a kind of commons thing that is not linguistic. sent5: that the pomade rationalizes and does droop is false if it does not premeditate. sent6: the pomade is not socioeconomic if the fact that the victimizer is not calyptrate and is not socioeconomic is not right. sent7: if the fact that something does rationalize and it droops is not true it does not ripen IDP. sent8: the victimizer is not linguistic. sent9: if something does not ripen IDP then the fact that either it is socioeconomic or it is not calyptrate or both hold. sent10: the victimizer is not linguistic if the fact that it is not calyptrate is not incorrect. sent11: the silverpoint is socioeconomic and is not a kind of a weekday. sent12: the victimizer is not calyptrate. sent13: that the victimizer is noncomprehensive is right. sent14: if something does not ripen IDP the fact that it is both not calyptrate and not socioeconomic is not correct. | ¬{B}{b} | sent1: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} sent2: ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} sent3: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬{C}x sent4: ¬{A}{a} -> ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent5: ¬{F}{b} -> ¬({E}{b} & {D}{b}) sent6: ¬(¬{A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} sent7: (x): ¬({E}x & {D}x) -> ¬{C}x sent8: ¬{AB}{a} sent9: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({B}x v ¬{A}x) sent10: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{AB}{a} sent11: ({B}{ge} & ¬{ES}{ge}) sent12: ¬{A}{a} sent13: {HR}{a} sent14: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & ¬{B}x) | [
"sent4 & sent12 -> int1: the victimizer is commons but it is not linguistic.; sent1 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent4 & sent12 -> int1: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}); sent1 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 2 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 11 | the pomade is not socioeconomic. | ¬{B}{b} | 6 | [
"sent14 -> int2: the fact that the victimizer is non-calyptrate and it is not socioeconomic is false if the fact that it does not ripen IDP is not false.; sent3 -> int3: that the victimizer does not ripen IDP is true if it does not droop.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the pomade is not socioeconomic. ; $context$ = sent1: if the victimizer is commons but it is not linguistic then the fact that the pomade is socioeconomic hold. sent2: the pomade is socioeconomic if the victimizer is commons and it is linguistic. sent3: something does not ripen IDP if it does not droop. sent4: if the victimizer is not calyptrate then it is a kind of commons thing that is not linguistic. sent5: that the pomade rationalizes and does droop is false if it does not premeditate. sent6: the pomade is not socioeconomic if the fact that the victimizer is not calyptrate and is not socioeconomic is not right. sent7: if the fact that something does rationalize and it droops is not true it does not ripen IDP. sent8: the victimizer is not linguistic. sent9: if something does not ripen IDP then the fact that either it is socioeconomic or it is not calyptrate or both hold. sent10: the victimizer is not linguistic if the fact that it is not calyptrate is not incorrect. sent11: the silverpoint is socioeconomic and is not a kind of a weekday. sent12: the victimizer is not calyptrate. sent13: that the victimizer is noncomprehensive is right. sent14: if something does not ripen IDP the fact that it is both not calyptrate and not socioeconomic is not correct. ; $proof$ = | sent4 & sent12 -> int1: the victimizer is commons but it is not linguistic.; sent1 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | if the victimizer is not calyptrate then it is a kind of commons thing that is not linguistic. | [
"the victimizer is not calyptrate.",
"if the victimizer is commons but it is not linguistic then the fact that the pomade is socioeconomic hold."
] | [
"It is a kind of commons thing that is not linguistic if the victimizer is not calyptrate.",
"The victimizer is not linguistic if it is not calyptrate."
] | The victimizer is not linguistic if it is not calyptrate. | if the victimizer is commons but it is not linguistic then the fact that the pomade is socioeconomic hold. |
the peninsularness and/or the non-Jacobeanness occurs. | sent1: the hairlessness but not the ripening Asin occurs. sent2: that the hairlessness happens but the ripening Asin does not occur brings about that the aiming occurs. | ({A} v ¬{C}) | sent1: ({AA} & ¬{AB}) sent2: ({AA} & ¬{AB}) -> {B} | [
"sent2 & sent1 -> int1: the aim occurs.;"
] | UNKNOWN | [
"sent2 & sent1 -> int1: {B};"
] | UNKNOWN | 2 | null | 0 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | [] | null | null | $hypothesis$ = the peninsularness and/or the non-Jacobeanness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the hairlessness but not the ripening Asin occurs. sent2: that the hairlessness happens but the ripening Asin does not occur brings about that the aiming occurs. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | that the hairlessness happens but the ripening Asin does not occur brings about that the aiming occurs. | [
"the hairlessness but not the ripening Asin occurs."
] | [
"that the hairlessness happens but the ripening Asin does not occur brings about that the aiming occurs."
] | that the hairlessness happens but the ripening Asin does not occur brings about that the aiming occurs. | the hairlessness but not the ripening Asin occurs. |
the fact that the neuroglialness happens is not false. | sent1: if the motorization occurs the fact that the entraining occurs but the levanter does not occur is not right. sent2: that the wobble does not occur and the chemoreceptiveness does not occur is brought about by that the betterment does not occur. sent3: if the hypothalamicness does not occur then the motorization happens and the scouting does not occur. sent4: if that either the mutilation or the subscriptness or both happens does not hold then the presence does not occur. sent5: the fact that the Cromwellianness happens or the absolving does not occur or both is incorrect if the rat-a-tat-tat does not occur. sent6: the impugning idealization happens. sent7: the non-neuroglialness is prevented by the acneiformness. sent8: the rat-a-tat-tat does not occur if the stumbling occurs. sent9: the shoot-down does not occur but the wheellessness happens if the rehearing tumbrel does not occur. sent10: the non-hypothalamicness is caused by that the shoot-down does not occur. sent11: that the entraining does not occur causes that not the roughing waxycap but the ripening promisee happens. sent12: the fact that the neuroglialness does not occur is true if the immersing happens and the impugning idealization does not occur. sent13: the entraining does not occur if that the fact that the entraining but not the levanter occurs does not hold is right. sent14: both the impugning idealization and the immersing happens. sent15: the immersing leads to the acneiformness. sent16: that the stumbling happens is brought about by that not the immunohistochemistry but the reformation occurs. sent17: that the presence does not occur brings about that the acneiformness does not occur and the moksa does not occur. sent18: if that the Cromwellianness occurs and/or the absolving does not occur is not true then the betterment does not occur. sent19: that either the mutilation or the subscriptness or both happens does not hold if the wobble does not occur. sent20: if the impugning Antoninus occurs then the rehearing avowal happens. sent21: that the immunohistochemistry does not occur but the reformation occurs is brought about by that the roughing waxycap does not occur. | {D} | sent1: {AA} -> ¬({T} & ¬{U}) sent2: ¬{K} -> (¬{I} & ¬{J}) sent3: ¬{AC} -> ({AA} & ¬{AB}) sent4: ¬({G} v {H}) -> ¬{F} sent5: ¬{N} -> ¬({M} v ¬{L}) sent6: {A} sent7: {C} -> {D} sent8: {O} -> ¬{N} sent9: ¬{AF} -> (¬{AD} & {AE}) sent10: ¬{AD} -> ¬{AC} sent11: ¬{T} -> (¬{R} & {S}) sent12: ({B} & ¬{A}) -> ¬{D} sent13: ¬({T} & ¬{U}) -> ¬{T} sent14: ({A} & {B}) sent15: {B} -> {C} sent16: (¬{P} & {Q}) -> {O} sent17: ¬{F} -> (¬{C} & ¬{E}) sent18: ¬({M} v ¬{L}) -> ¬{K} sent19: ¬{I} -> ¬({G} v {H}) sent20: {DG} -> {DE} sent21: ¬{R} -> (¬{P} & {Q}) | [
"sent14 -> int1: the immersing occurs.; sent15 & int1 -> int2: the acneiformness occurs.; sent7 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent14 -> int1: {B}; sent15 & int1 -> int2: {C}; sent7 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 3 | 3 | 18 | 0 | 18 | the neuroglialness does not occur. | ¬{D} | 22 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the neuroglialness happens is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the motorization occurs the fact that the entraining occurs but the levanter does not occur is not right. sent2: that the wobble does not occur and the chemoreceptiveness does not occur is brought about by that the betterment does not occur. sent3: if the hypothalamicness does not occur then the motorization happens and the scouting does not occur. sent4: if that either the mutilation or the subscriptness or both happens does not hold then the presence does not occur. sent5: the fact that the Cromwellianness happens or the absolving does not occur or both is incorrect if the rat-a-tat-tat does not occur. sent6: the impugning idealization happens. sent7: the non-neuroglialness is prevented by the acneiformness. sent8: the rat-a-tat-tat does not occur if the stumbling occurs. sent9: the shoot-down does not occur but the wheellessness happens if the rehearing tumbrel does not occur. sent10: the non-hypothalamicness is caused by that the shoot-down does not occur. sent11: that the entraining does not occur causes that not the roughing waxycap but the ripening promisee happens. sent12: the fact that the neuroglialness does not occur is true if the immersing happens and the impugning idealization does not occur. sent13: the entraining does not occur if that the fact that the entraining but not the levanter occurs does not hold is right. sent14: both the impugning idealization and the immersing happens. sent15: the immersing leads to the acneiformness. sent16: that the stumbling happens is brought about by that not the immunohistochemistry but the reformation occurs. sent17: that the presence does not occur brings about that the acneiformness does not occur and the moksa does not occur. sent18: if that the Cromwellianness occurs and/or the absolving does not occur is not true then the betterment does not occur. sent19: that either the mutilation or the subscriptness or both happens does not hold if the wobble does not occur. sent20: if the impugning Antoninus occurs then the rehearing avowal happens. sent21: that the immunohistochemistry does not occur but the reformation occurs is brought about by that the roughing waxycap does not occur. ; $proof$ = | sent14 -> int1: the immersing occurs.; sent15 & int1 -> int2: the acneiformness occurs.; sent7 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | both the impugning idealization and the immersing happens. | [
"the immersing leads to the acneiformness.",
"the non-neuroglialness is prevented by the acneiformness."
] | [
"The impugning idealization happens.",
"The impugning idealization occurs."
] | The impugning idealization happens. | the immersing leads to the acneiformness. |
the fact that the neuroglialness happens is not false. | sent1: if the motorization occurs the fact that the entraining occurs but the levanter does not occur is not right. sent2: that the wobble does not occur and the chemoreceptiveness does not occur is brought about by that the betterment does not occur. sent3: if the hypothalamicness does not occur then the motorization happens and the scouting does not occur. sent4: if that either the mutilation or the subscriptness or both happens does not hold then the presence does not occur. sent5: the fact that the Cromwellianness happens or the absolving does not occur or both is incorrect if the rat-a-tat-tat does not occur. sent6: the impugning idealization happens. sent7: the non-neuroglialness is prevented by the acneiformness. sent8: the rat-a-tat-tat does not occur if the stumbling occurs. sent9: the shoot-down does not occur but the wheellessness happens if the rehearing tumbrel does not occur. sent10: the non-hypothalamicness is caused by that the shoot-down does not occur. sent11: that the entraining does not occur causes that not the roughing waxycap but the ripening promisee happens. sent12: the fact that the neuroglialness does not occur is true if the immersing happens and the impugning idealization does not occur. sent13: the entraining does not occur if that the fact that the entraining but not the levanter occurs does not hold is right. sent14: both the impugning idealization and the immersing happens. sent15: the immersing leads to the acneiformness. sent16: that the stumbling happens is brought about by that not the immunohistochemistry but the reformation occurs. sent17: that the presence does not occur brings about that the acneiformness does not occur and the moksa does not occur. sent18: if that the Cromwellianness occurs and/or the absolving does not occur is not true then the betterment does not occur. sent19: that either the mutilation or the subscriptness or both happens does not hold if the wobble does not occur. sent20: if the impugning Antoninus occurs then the rehearing avowal happens. sent21: that the immunohistochemistry does not occur but the reformation occurs is brought about by that the roughing waxycap does not occur. | {D} | sent1: {AA} -> ¬({T} & ¬{U}) sent2: ¬{K} -> (¬{I} & ¬{J}) sent3: ¬{AC} -> ({AA} & ¬{AB}) sent4: ¬({G} v {H}) -> ¬{F} sent5: ¬{N} -> ¬({M} v ¬{L}) sent6: {A} sent7: {C} -> {D} sent8: {O} -> ¬{N} sent9: ¬{AF} -> (¬{AD} & {AE}) sent10: ¬{AD} -> ¬{AC} sent11: ¬{T} -> (¬{R} & {S}) sent12: ({B} & ¬{A}) -> ¬{D} sent13: ¬({T} & ¬{U}) -> ¬{T} sent14: ({A} & {B}) sent15: {B} -> {C} sent16: (¬{P} & {Q}) -> {O} sent17: ¬{F} -> (¬{C} & ¬{E}) sent18: ¬({M} v ¬{L}) -> ¬{K} sent19: ¬{I} -> ¬({G} v {H}) sent20: {DG} -> {DE} sent21: ¬{R} -> (¬{P} & {Q}) | [
"sent14 -> int1: the immersing occurs.; sent15 & int1 -> int2: the acneiformness occurs.; sent7 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent14 -> int1: {B}; sent15 & int1 -> int2: {C}; sent7 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 3 | 3 | 18 | 0 | 18 | the neuroglialness does not occur. | ¬{D} | 22 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the neuroglialness happens is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the motorization occurs the fact that the entraining occurs but the levanter does not occur is not right. sent2: that the wobble does not occur and the chemoreceptiveness does not occur is brought about by that the betterment does not occur. sent3: if the hypothalamicness does not occur then the motorization happens and the scouting does not occur. sent4: if that either the mutilation or the subscriptness or both happens does not hold then the presence does not occur. sent5: the fact that the Cromwellianness happens or the absolving does not occur or both is incorrect if the rat-a-tat-tat does not occur. sent6: the impugning idealization happens. sent7: the non-neuroglialness is prevented by the acneiformness. sent8: the rat-a-tat-tat does not occur if the stumbling occurs. sent9: the shoot-down does not occur but the wheellessness happens if the rehearing tumbrel does not occur. sent10: the non-hypothalamicness is caused by that the shoot-down does not occur. sent11: that the entraining does not occur causes that not the roughing waxycap but the ripening promisee happens. sent12: the fact that the neuroglialness does not occur is true if the immersing happens and the impugning idealization does not occur. sent13: the entraining does not occur if that the fact that the entraining but not the levanter occurs does not hold is right. sent14: both the impugning idealization and the immersing happens. sent15: the immersing leads to the acneiformness. sent16: that the stumbling happens is brought about by that not the immunohistochemistry but the reformation occurs. sent17: that the presence does not occur brings about that the acneiformness does not occur and the moksa does not occur. sent18: if that the Cromwellianness occurs and/or the absolving does not occur is not true then the betterment does not occur. sent19: that either the mutilation or the subscriptness or both happens does not hold if the wobble does not occur. sent20: if the impugning Antoninus occurs then the rehearing avowal happens. sent21: that the immunohistochemistry does not occur but the reformation occurs is brought about by that the roughing waxycap does not occur. ; $proof$ = | sent14 -> int1: the immersing occurs.; sent15 & int1 -> int2: the acneiformness occurs.; sent7 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | both the impugning idealization and the immersing happens. | [
"the immersing leads to the acneiformness.",
"the non-neuroglialness is prevented by the acneiformness."
] | [
"The impugning idealization happens.",
"The impugning idealization occurs."
] | The impugning idealization occurs. | the non-neuroglialness is prevented by the acneiformness. |
the fact that the felloe is official is not false. | sent1: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a canine then the Corinthian is not a unresponsiveness and/or it is not ateleiotic. sent2: an explosive rehears foolscap. sent3: something does rough Thysanoptera if it does not uncover and/or it is not a kind of a appreciator. sent4: if the felloe is a bellows then it is an official. sent5: there exists something such that it does impugn felloe. sent6: there exists something such that it does not impugn felloe. sent7: the felloe is an official and/or it does not clip. sent8: something is a Indonesian if it is not a canine or it is not a wallah or both. sent9: if the fact that the planation is a wallah hold then it is canine. sent10: the felloe maunders. sent11: if the felloe is not a kind of a canine it is a kind of a Indonesian. sent12: something is a dodge if that it is unhappy is not incorrect. sent13: the felloe is a canine and/or is not a wallah if there is something such that it does not impugn felloe. sent14: if something is not a canine then it is a Indonesian. sent15: something is a Zionism if it does exercise. sent16: if something is Indonesian it is an official. sent17: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not impugn felloe is not incorrect either the felloe is non-canine or it is not a wallah or both. sent18: something is not an official if the fact that it does not impugn felloe is not incorrect. sent19: if something substitutes then it does impugn Yastrzemski. sent20: the felloe is canine or is not a kind of a wallah or both. | {E}{a} | sent1: (x): ¬{B}x -> (¬{EA}{fk} v ¬{DA}{fk}) sent2: (x): {IR}x -> {HD}x sent3: (x): (¬{GH}x v ¬{CM}x) -> {GP}x sent4: {EJ}{a} -> {E}{a} sent5: (Ex): {A}x sent6: (Ex): ¬{A}x sent7: ({E}{a} v ¬{HH}{a}) sent8: (x): (¬{B}x v ¬{C}x) -> {D}x sent9: {C}{e} -> {B}{e} sent10: {IT}{a} sent11: ¬{B}{a} -> {D}{a} sent12: (x): {FU}x -> {P}x sent13: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({B}{a} v ¬{C}{a}) sent14: (x): ¬{B}x -> {D}x sent15: (x): {EF}x -> {DN}x sent16: (x): {D}x -> {E}x sent17: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{B}{a} v ¬{C}{a}) sent18: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬{E}x sent19: (x): {N}x -> {EM}x sent20: ({B}{a} v ¬{C}{a}) | [
"sent6 & sent17 -> int1: the felloe is not a canine and/or it is not a kind of a wallah.; sent8 -> int2: if the felloe is not a canine and/or it is not a wallah then it is a Indonesian.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the felloe is a Indonesian.; sent16 -> int4: the felloe is an official if that it is not non-Indonesian is right.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent6 & sent17 -> int1: (¬{B}{a} v ¬{C}{a}); sent8 -> int2: (¬{B}{a} v ¬{C}{a}) -> {D}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: {D}{a}; sent16 -> int4: {D}{a} -> {E}{a}; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 3 | 3 | 16 | 0 | 16 | the felloe is not an official. | ¬{E}{a} | 5 | [
"sent18 -> int5: if the felloe does not impugn felloe then it is not an official.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the felloe is official is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a canine then the Corinthian is not a unresponsiveness and/or it is not ateleiotic. sent2: an explosive rehears foolscap. sent3: something does rough Thysanoptera if it does not uncover and/or it is not a kind of a appreciator. sent4: if the felloe is a bellows then it is an official. sent5: there exists something such that it does impugn felloe. sent6: there exists something such that it does not impugn felloe. sent7: the felloe is an official and/or it does not clip. sent8: something is a Indonesian if it is not a canine or it is not a wallah or both. sent9: if the fact that the planation is a wallah hold then it is canine. sent10: the felloe maunders. sent11: if the felloe is not a kind of a canine it is a kind of a Indonesian. sent12: something is a dodge if that it is unhappy is not incorrect. sent13: the felloe is a canine and/or is not a wallah if there is something such that it does not impugn felloe. sent14: if something is not a canine then it is a Indonesian. sent15: something is a Zionism if it does exercise. sent16: if something is Indonesian it is an official. sent17: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not impugn felloe is not incorrect either the felloe is non-canine or it is not a wallah or both. sent18: something is not an official if the fact that it does not impugn felloe is not incorrect. sent19: if something substitutes then it does impugn Yastrzemski. sent20: the felloe is canine or is not a kind of a wallah or both. ; $proof$ = | sent6 & sent17 -> int1: the felloe is not a canine and/or it is not a kind of a wallah.; sent8 -> int2: if the felloe is not a canine and/or it is not a wallah then it is a Indonesian.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the felloe is a Indonesian.; sent16 -> int4: the felloe is an official if that it is not non-Indonesian is right.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | there exists something such that it does not impugn felloe. | [
"if there exists something such that the fact that it does not impugn felloe is not incorrect either the felloe is non-canine or it is not a wallah or both.",
"something is a Indonesian if it is not a canine or it is not a wallah or both.",
"if something is Indonesian it is an official."
] | [
"There is something that does not impugn felloe.",
"There is something that doesn't impugn felloe.",
"There is a thing that does not impugn felloe."
] | There is something that does not impugn felloe. | if there exists something such that the fact that it does not impugn felloe is not incorrect either the felloe is non-canine or it is not a wallah or both. |
the fact that the felloe is official is not false. | sent1: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a canine then the Corinthian is not a unresponsiveness and/or it is not ateleiotic. sent2: an explosive rehears foolscap. sent3: something does rough Thysanoptera if it does not uncover and/or it is not a kind of a appreciator. sent4: if the felloe is a bellows then it is an official. sent5: there exists something such that it does impugn felloe. sent6: there exists something such that it does not impugn felloe. sent7: the felloe is an official and/or it does not clip. sent8: something is a Indonesian if it is not a canine or it is not a wallah or both. sent9: if the fact that the planation is a wallah hold then it is canine. sent10: the felloe maunders. sent11: if the felloe is not a kind of a canine it is a kind of a Indonesian. sent12: something is a dodge if that it is unhappy is not incorrect. sent13: the felloe is a canine and/or is not a wallah if there is something such that it does not impugn felloe. sent14: if something is not a canine then it is a Indonesian. sent15: something is a Zionism if it does exercise. sent16: if something is Indonesian it is an official. sent17: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not impugn felloe is not incorrect either the felloe is non-canine or it is not a wallah or both. sent18: something is not an official if the fact that it does not impugn felloe is not incorrect. sent19: if something substitutes then it does impugn Yastrzemski. sent20: the felloe is canine or is not a kind of a wallah or both. | {E}{a} | sent1: (x): ¬{B}x -> (¬{EA}{fk} v ¬{DA}{fk}) sent2: (x): {IR}x -> {HD}x sent3: (x): (¬{GH}x v ¬{CM}x) -> {GP}x sent4: {EJ}{a} -> {E}{a} sent5: (Ex): {A}x sent6: (Ex): ¬{A}x sent7: ({E}{a} v ¬{HH}{a}) sent8: (x): (¬{B}x v ¬{C}x) -> {D}x sent9: {C}{e} -> {B}{e} sent10: {IT}{a} sent11: ¬{B}{a} -> {D}{a} sent12: (x): {FU}x -> {P}x sent13: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({B}{a} v ¬{C}{a}) sent14: (x): ¬{B}x -> {D}x sent15: (x): {EF}x -> {DN}x sent16: (x): {D}x -> {E}x sent17: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{B}{a} v ¬{C}{a}) sent18: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬{E}x sent19: (x): {N}x -> {EM}x sent20: ({B}{a} v ¬{C}{a}) | [
"sent6 & sent17 -> int1: the felloe is not a canine and/or it is not a kind of a wallah.; sent8 -> int2: if the felloe is not a canine and/or it is not a wallah then it is a Indonesian.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the felloe is a Indonesian.; sent16 -> int4: the felloe is an official if that it is not non-Indonesian is right.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent6 & sent17 -> int1: (¬{B}{a} v ¬{C}{a}); sent8 -> int2: (¬{B}{a} v ¬{C}{a}) -> {D}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: {D}{a}; sent16 -> int4: {D}{a} -> {E}{a}; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 3 | 3 | 16 | 0 | 16 | the felloe is not an official. | ¬{E}{a} | 5 | [
"sent18 -> int5: if the felloe does not impugn felloe then it is not an official.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the felloe is official is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a canine then the Corinthian is not a unresponsiveness and/or it is not ateleiotic. sent2: an explosive rehears foolscap. sent3: something does rough Thysanoptera if it does not uncover and/or it is not a kind of a appreciator. sent4: if the felloe is a bellows then it is an official. sent5: there exists something such that it does impugn felloe. sent6: there exists something such that it does not impugn felloe. sent7: the felloe is an official and/or it does not clip. sent8: something is a Indonesian if it is not a canine or it is not a wallah or both. sent9: if the fact that the planation is a wallah hold then it is canine. sent10: the felloe maunders. sent11: if the felloe is not a kind of a canine it is a kind of a Indonesian. sent12: something is a dodge if that it is unhappy is not incorrect. sent13: the felloe is a canine and/or is not a wallah if there is something such that it does not impugn felloe. sent14: if something is not a canine then it is a Indonesian. sent15: something is a Zionism if it does exercise. sent16: if something is Indonesian it is an official. sent17: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not impugn felloe is not incorrect either the felloe is non-canine or it is not a wallah or both. sent18: something is not an official if the fact that it does not impugn felloe is not incorrect. sent19: if something substitutes then it does impugn Yastrzemski. sent20: the felloe is canine or is not a kind of a wallah or both. ; $proof$ = | sent6 & sent17 -> int1: the felloe is not a canine and/or it is not a kind of a wallah.; sent8 -> int2: if the felloe is not a canine and/or it is not a wallah then it is a Indonesian.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the felloe is a Indonesian.; sent16 -> int4: the felloe is an official if that it is not non-Indonesian is right.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | there exists something such that it does not impugn felloe. | [
"if there exists something such that the fact that it does not impugn felloe is not incorrect either the felloe is non-canine or it is not a wallah or both.",
"something is a Indonesian if it is not a canine or it is not a wallah or both.",
"if something is Indonesian it is an official."
] | [
"There is something that does not impugn felloe.",
"There is something that doesn't impugn felloe.",
"There is a thing that does not impugn felloe."
] | There is something that doesn't impugn felloe. | something is a Indonesian if it is not a canine or it is not a wallah or both. |
the fact that the felloe is official is not false. | sent1: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a canine then the Corinthian is not a unresponsiveness and/or it is not ateleiotic. sent2: an explosive rehears foolscap. sent3: something does rough Thysanoptera if it does not uncover and/or it is not a kind of a appreciator. sent4: if the felloe is a bellows then it is an official. sent5: there exists something such that it does impugn felloe. sent6: there exists something such that it does not impugn felloe. sent7: the felloe is an official and/or it does not clip. sent8: something is a Indonesian if it is not a canine or it is not a wallah or both. sent9: if the fact that the planation is a wallah hold then it is canine. sent10: the felloe maunders. sent11: if the felloe is not a kind of a canine it is a kind of a Indonesian. sent12: something is a dodge if that it is unhappy is not incorrect. sent13: the felloe is a canine and/or is not a wallah if there is something such that it does not impugn felloe. sent14: if something is not a canine then it is a Indonesian. sent15: something is a Zionism if it does exercise. sent16: if something is Indonesian it is an official. sent17: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not impugn felloe is not incorrect either the felloe is non-canine or it is not a wallah or both. sent18: something is not an official if the fact that it does not impugn felloe is not incorrect. sent19: if something substitutes then it does impugn Yastrzemski. sent20: the felloe is canine or is not a kind of a wallah or both. | {E}{a} | sent1: (x): ¬{B}x -> (¬{EA}{fk} v ¬{DA}{fk}) sent2: (x): {IR}x -> {HD}x sent3: (x): (¬{GH}x v ¬{CM}x) -> {GP}x sent4: {EJ}{a} -> {E}{a} sent5: (Ex): {A}x sent6: (Ex): ¬{A}x sent7: ({E}{a} v ¬{HH}{a}) sent8: (x): (¬{B}x v ¬{C}x) -> {D}x sent9: {C}{e} -> {B}{e} sent10: {IT}{a} sent11: ¬{B}{a} -> {D}{a} sent12: (x): {FU}x -> {P}x sent13: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({B}{a} v ¬{C}{a}) sent14: (x): ¬{B}x -> {D}x sent15: (x): {EF}x -> {DN}x sent16: (x): {D}x -> {E}x sent17: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{B}{a} v ¬{C}{a}) sent18: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬{E}x sent19: (x): {N}x -> {EM}x sent20: ({B}{a} v ¬{C}{a}) | [
"sent6 & sent17 -> int1: the felloe is not a canine and/or it is not a kind of a wallah.; sent8 -> int2: if the felloe is not a canine and/or it is not a wallah then it is a Indonesian.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the felloe is a Indonesian.; sent16 -> int4: the felloe is an official if that it is not non-Indonesian is right.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent6 & sent17 -> int1: (¬{B}{a} v ¬{C}{a}); sent8 -> int2: (¬{B}{a} v ¬{C}{a}) -> {D}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: {D}{a}; sent16 -> int4: {D}{a} -> {E}{a}; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 3 | 3 | 16 | 0 | 16 | the felloe is not an official. | ¬{E}{a} | 5 | [
"sent18 -> int5: if the felloe does not impugn felloe then it is not an official.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the felloe is official is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a canine then the Corinthian is not a unresponsiveness and/or it is not ateleiotic. sent2: an explosive rehears foolscap. sent3: something does rough Thysanoptera if it does not uncover and/or it is not a kind of a appreciator. sent4: if the felloe is a bellows then it is an official. sent5: there exists something such that it does impugn felloe. sent6: there exists something such that it does not impugn felloe. sent7: the felloe is an official and/or it does not clip. sent8: something is a Indonesian if it is not a canine or it is not a wallah or both. sent9: if the fact that the planation is a wallah hold then it is canine. sent10: the felloe maunders. sent11: if the felloe is not a kind of a canine it is a kind of a Indonesian. sent12: something is a dodge if that it is unhappy is not incorrect. sent13: the felloe is a canine and/or is not a wallah if there is something such that it does not impugn felloe. sent14: if something is not a canine then it is a Indonesian. sent15: something is a Zionism if it does exercise. sent16: if something is Indonesian it is an official. sent17: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not impugn felloe is not incorrect either the felloe is non-canine or it is not a wallah or both. sent18: something is not an official if the fact that it does not impugn felloe is not incorrect. sent19: if something substitutes then it does impugn Yastrzemski. sent20: the felloe is canine or is not a kind of a wallah or both. ; $proof$ = | sent6 & sent17 -> int1: the felloe is not a canine and/or it is not a kind of a wallah.; sent8 -> int2: if the felloe is not a canine and/or it is not a wallah then it is a Indonesian.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the felloe is a Indonesian.; sent16 -> int4: the felloe is an official if that it is not non-Indonesian is right.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | there exists something such that it does not impugn felloe. | [
"if there exists something such that the fact that it does not impugn felloe is not incorrect either the felloe is non-canine or it is not a wallah or both.",
"something is a Indonesian if it is not a canine or it is not a wallah or both.",
"if something is Indonesian it is an official."
] | [
"There is something that does not impugn felloe.",
"There is something that doesn't impugn felloe.",
"There is a thing that does not impugn felloe."
] | There is a thing that does not impugn felloe. | if something is Indonesian it is an official. |
the diastolicness and the fulling happens. | sent1: the fact that that the rolling does not occur and the roughing intention does not occur is not right hold. sent2: the caravanning does not occur. sent3: the fact that the latestness does not occur and the gust does not occur is not true. sent4: the ripening ICU occurs and the synthesizing occurs. sent5: the assembly occurs. sent6: if the quadrille does not occur then the fullness occurs and the assembly happens. sent7: the roughing antineutron does not occur. sent8: that both the non-cogitativeness and the quadrille happens is incorrect. sent9: the fact that the ripening parakeet does not occur and the espionage does not occur is not true if the tightness does not occur. sent10: the elementariness does not occur. sent11: both the slavery and the unoriginalness happens. sent12: if the quadrille does not occur the assembly occurs. sent13: the resonance occurs and the impugning boneshaker occurs. sent14: if the caravanning does not occur then the fact that both the non-diastolicness and the non-recessionariness happens is not true. sent15: the ripening Hutton happens. sent16: the abranchiateness and the concretisticness happens. sent17: the fenestration does not occur. sent18: the quadrille does not occur if the fact that both the non-cogitativeness and the quadrille occurs does not hold. sent19: the main happens and the palatine happens if the maxillomandibularness does not occur. sent20: the tightness happens. | ({A} & {C}) | sent1: ¬(¬{BK} & ¬{EB}) sent2: ¬{F} sent3: ¬(¬{R} & ¬{GR}) sent4: ({EA} & {HD}) sent5: {D} sent6: ¬{E} -> ({C} & {D}) sent7: ¬{CK} sent8: ¬(¬{G} & {E}) sent9: ¬{EF} -> ¬(¬{BD} & ¬{IP}) sent10: ¬{BH} sent11: ({FI} & {DB}) sent12: ¬{E} -> {D} sent13: ({GQ} & {CR}) sent14: ¬{F} -> ¬(¬{A} & ¬{B}) sent15: {DN} sent16: ({FD} & {IT}) sent17: ¬{DF} sent18: ¬(¬{G} & {E}) -> ¬{E} sent19: ¬{HC} -> ({EM} & {JI}) sent20: {EF} | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the diastolicness does not occur.; sent14 & sent2 -> int1: that the non-diastolicness and the non-recessionaryness occurs is not true.; sent18 & sent8 -> int2: that the quadrille occurs is false.; sent6 & int2 -> int3: the fullness occurs and the assembly happens.; int3 -> int4: the fulling occurs.;"
] | UNKNOWN | [
"void -> assump1: ¬{A}; sent14 & sent2 -> int1: ¬(¬{A} & ¬{B}); sent18 & sent8 -> int2: ¬{E}; sent6 & int2 -> int3: ({C} & {D}); int3 -> int4: {C};"
] | UNKNOWN | 4 | null | 15 | 0 | 15 | the fact that the diastolicness occurs and the fullness happens is wrong. | ¬({A} & {C}) | 0 | [
" -> hypothesis;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the diastolicness and the fulling happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that that the rolling does not occur and the roughing intention does not occur is not right hold. sent2: the caravanning does not occur. sent3: the fact that the latestness does not occur and the gust does not occur is not true. sent4: the ripening ICU occurs and the synthesizing occurs. sent5: the assembly occurs. sent6: if the quadrille does not occur then the fullness occurs and the assembly happens. sent7: the roughing antineutron does not occur. sent8: that both the non-cogitativeness and the quadrille happens is incorrect. sent9: the fact that the ripening parakeet does not occur and the espionage does not occur is not true if the tightness does not occur. sent10: the elementariness does not occur. sent11: both the slavery and the unoriginalness happens. sent12: if the quadrille does not occur the assembly occurs. sent13: the resonance occurs and the impugning boneshaker occurs. sent14: if the caravanning does not occur then the fact that both the non-diastolicness and the non-recessionariness happens is not true. sent15: the ripening Hutton happens. sent16: the abranchiateness and the concretisticness happens. sent17: the fenestration does not occur. sent18: the quadrille does not occur if the fact that both the non-cogitativeness and the quadrille occurs does not hold. sent19: the main happens and the palatine happens if the maxillomandibularness does not occur. sent20: the tightness happens. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | if the caravanning does not occur then the fact that both the non-diastolicness and the non-recessionariness happens is not true. | [
"the caravanning does not occur.",
"the quadrille does not occur if the fact that both the non-cogitativeness and the quadrille occurs does not hold.",
"that both the non-cogitativeness and the quadrille happens is incorrect.",
"if the quadrille does not occur then the fullness occurs and the assembly happens."
] | [
"If the caravanning doesn't happen then the non-diastolicness and non-recessionariness isn't true.",
"If the caravanning doesn't happen, the non-diastolicness and non-recessionariness isn't true.",
"The non-diastolicness and non-recessionariness is not true if the caravanning doesn't happen.",
"If the caravanning doesn't happen then the non-diastolicness and non-recessionariness is not true."
] | If the caravanning doesn't happen then the non-diastolicness and non-recessionariness isn't true. | the caravanning does not occur. |
the diastolicness and the fulling happens. | sent1: the fact that that the rolling does not occur and the roughing intention does not occur is not right hold. sent2: the caravanning does not occur. sent3: the fact that the latestness does not occur and the gust does not occur is not true. sent4: the ripening ICU occurs and the synthesizing occurs. sent5: the assembly occurs. sent6: if the quadrille does not occur then the fullness occurs and the assembly happens. sent7: the roughing antineutron does not occur. sent8: that both the non-cogitativeness and the quadrille happens is incorrect. sent9: the fact that the ripening parakeet does not occur and the espionage does not occur is not true if the tightness does not occur. sent10: the elementariness does not occur. sent11: both the slavery and the unoriginalness happens. sent12: if the quadrille does not occur the assembly occurs. sent13: the resonance occurs and the impugning boneshaker occurs. sent14: if the caravanning does not occur then the fact that both the non-diastolicness and the non-recessionariness happens is not true. sent15: the ripening Hutton happens. sent16: the abranchiateness and the concretisticness happens. sent17: the fenestration does not occur. sent18: the quadrille does not occur if the fact that both the non-cogitativeness and the quadrille occurs does not hold. sent19: the main happens and the palatine happens if the maxillomandibularness does not occur. sent20: the tightness happens. | ({A} & {C}) | sent1: ¬(¬{BK} & ¬{EB}) sent2: ¬{F} sent3: ¬(¬{R} & ¬{GR}) sent4: ({EA} & {HD}) sent5: {D} sent6: ¬{E} -> ({C} & {D}) sent7: ¬{CK} sent8: ¬(¬{G} & {E}) sent9: ¬{EF} -> ¬(¬{BD} & ¬{IP}) sent10: ¬{BH} sent11: ({FI} & {DB}) sent12: ¬{E} -> {D} sent13: ({GQ} & {CR}) sent14: ¬{F} -> ¬(¬{A} & ¬{B}) sent15: {DN} sent16: ({FD} & {IT}) sent17: ¬{DF} sent18: ¬(¬{G} & {E}) -> ¬{E} sent19: ¬{HC} -> ({EM} & {JI}) sent20: {EF} | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the diastolicness does not occur.; sent14 & sent2 -> int1: that the non-diastolicness and the non-recessionaryness occurs is not true.; sent18 & sent8 -> int2: that the quadrille occurs is false.; sent6 & int2 -> int3: the fullness occurs and the assembly happens.; int3 -> int4: the fulling occurs.;"
] | UNKNOWN | [
"void -> assump1: ¬{A}; sent14 & sent2 -> int1: ¬(¬{A} & ¬{B}); sent18 & sent8 -> int2: ¬{E}; sent6 & int2 -> int3: ({C} & {D}); int3 -> int4: {C};"
] | UNKNOWN | 4 | null | 15 | 0 | 15 | the fact that the diastolicness occurs and the fullness happens is wrong. | ¬({A} & {C}) | 0 | [
" -> hypothesis;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the diastolicness and the fulling happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that that the rolling does not occur and the roughing intention does not occur is not right hold. sent2: the caravanning does not occur. sent3: the fact that the latestness does not occur and the gust does not occur is not true. sent4: the ripening ICU occurs and the synthesizing occurs. sent5: the assembly occurs. sent6: if the quadrille does not occur then the fullness occurs and the assembly happens. sent7: the roughing antineutron does not occur. sent8: that both the non-cogitativeness and the quadrille happens is incorrect. sent9: the fact that the ripening parakeet does not occur and the espionage does not occur is not true if the tightness does not occur. sent10: the elementariness does not occur. sent11: both the slavery and the unoriginalness happens. sent12: if the quadrille does not occur the assembly occurs. sent13: the resonance occurs and the impugning boneshaker occurs. sent14: if the caravanning does not occur then the fact that both the non-diastolicness and the non-recessionariness happens is not true. sent15: the ripening Hutton happens. sent16: the abranchiateness and the concretisticness happens. sent17: the fenestration does not occur. sent18: the quadrille does not occur if the fact that both the non-cogitativeness and the quadrille occurs does not hold. sent19: the main happens and the palatine happens if the maxillomandibularness does not occur. sent20: the tightness happens. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | if the caravanning does not occur then the fact that both the non-diastolicness and the non-recessionariness happens is not true. | [
"the caravanning does not occur.",
"the quadrille does not occur if the fact that both the non-cogitativeness and the quadrille occurs does not hold.",
"that both the non-cogitativeness and the quadrille happens is incorrect.",
"if the quadrille does not occur then the fullness occurs and the assembly happens."
] | [
"If the caravanning doesn't happen then the non-diastolicness and non-recessionariness isn't true.",
"If the caravanning doesn't happen, the non-diastolicness and non-recessionariness isn't true.",
"The non-diastolicness and non-recessionariness is not true if the caravanning doesn't happen.",
"If the caravanning doesn't happen then the non-diastolicness and non-recessionariness is not true."
] | If the caravanning doesn't happen, the non-diastolicness and non-recessionariness isn't true. | the quadrille does not occur if the fact that both the non-cogitativeness and the quadrille occurs does not hold. |
the diastolicness and the fulling happens. | sent1: the fact that that the rolling does not occur and the roughing intention does not occur is not right hold. sent2: the caravanning does not occur. sent3: the fact that the latestness does not occur and the gust does not occur is not true. sent4: the ripening ICU occurs and the synthesizing occurs. sent5: the assembly occurs. sent6: if the quadrille does not occur then the fullness occurs and the assembly happens. sent7: the roughing antineutron does not occur. sent8: that both the non-cogitativeness and the quadrille happens is incorrect. sent9: the fact that the ripening parakeet does not occur and the espionage does not occur is not true if the tightness does not occur. sent10: the elementariness does not occur. sent11: both the slavery and the unoriginalness happens. sent12: if the quadrille does not occur the assembly occurs. sent13: the resonance occurs and the impugning boneshaker occurs. sent14: if the caravanning does not occur then the fact that both the non-diastolicness and the non-recessionariness happens is not true. sent15: the ripening Hutton happens. sent16: the abranchiateness and the concretisticness happens. sent17: the fenestration does not occur. sent18: the quadrille does not occur if the fact that both the non-cogitativeness and the quadrille occurs does not hold. sent19: the main happens and the palatine happens if the maxillomandibularness does not occur. sent20: the tightness happens. | ({A} & {C}) | sent1: ¬(¬{BK} & ¬{EB}) sent2: ¬{F} sent3: ¬(¬{R} & ¬{GR}) sent4: ({EA} & {HD}) sent5: {D} sent6: ¬{E} -> ({C} & {D}) sent7: ¬{CK} sent8: ¬(¬{G} & {E}) sent9: ¬{EF} -> ¬(¬{BD} & ¬{IP}) sent10: ¬{BH} sent11: ({FI} & {DB}) sent12: ¬{E} -> {D} sent13: ({GQ} & {CR}) sent14: ¬{F} -> ¬(¬{A} & ¬{B}) sent15: {DN} sent16: ({FD} & {IT}) sent17: ¬{DF} sent18: ¬(¬{G} & {E}) -> ¬{E} sent19: ¬{HC} -> ({EM} & {JI}) sent20: {EF} | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the diastolicness does not occur.; sent14 & sent2 -> int1: that the non-diastolicness and the non-recessionaryness occurs is not true.; sent18 & sent8 -> int2: that the quadrille occurs is false.; sent6 & int2 -> int3: the fullness occurs and the assembly happens.; int3 -> int4: the fulling occurs.;"
] | UNKNOWN | [
"void -> assump1: ¬{A}; sent14 & sent2 -> int1: ¬(¬{A} & ¬{B}); sent18 & sent8 -> int2: ¬{E}; sent6 & int2 -> int3: ({C} & {D}); int3 -> int4: {C};"
] | UNKNOWN | 4 | null | 15 | 0 | 15 | the fact that the diastolicness occurs and the fullness happens is wrong. | ¬({A} & {C}) | 0 | [
" -> hypothesis;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the diastolicness and the fulling happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that that the rolling does not occur and the roughing intention does not occur is not right hold. sent2: the caravanning does not occur. sent3: the fact that the latestness does not occur and the gust does not occur is not true. sent4: the ripening ICU occurs and the synthesizing occurs. sent5: the assembly occurs. sent6: if the quadrille does not occur then the fullness occurs and the assembly happens. sent7: the roughing antineutron does not occur. sent8: that both the non-cogitativeness and the quadrille happens is incorrect. sent9: the fact that the ripening parakeet does not occur and the espionage does not occur is not true if the tightness does not occur. sent10: the elementariness does not occur. sent11: both the slavery and the unoriginalness happens. sent12: if the quadrille does not occur the assembly occurs. sent13: the resonance occurs and the impugning boneshaker occurs. sent14: if the caravanning does not occur then the fact that both the non-diastolicness and the non-recessionariness happens is not true. sent15: the ripening Hutton happens. sent16: the abranchiateness and the concretisticness happens. sent17: the fenestration does not occur. sent18: the quadrille does not occur if the fact that both the non-cogitativeness and the quadrille occurs does not hold. sent19: the main happens and the palatine happens if the maxillomandibularness does not occur. sent20: the tightness happens. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | if the caravanning does not occur then the fact that both the non-diastolicness and the non-recessionariness happens is not true. | [
"the caravanning does not occur.",
"the quadrille does not occur if the fact that both the non-cogitativeness and the quadrille occurs does not hold.",
"that both the non-cogitativeness and the quadrille happens is incorrect.",
"if the quadrille does not occur then the fullness occurs and the assembly happens."
] | [
"If the caravanning doesn't happen then the non-diastolicness and non-recessionariness isn't true.",
"If the caravanning doesn't happen, the non-diastolicness and non-recessionariness isn't true.",
"The non-diastolicness and non-recessionariness is not true if the caravanning doesn't happen.",
"If the caravanning doesn't happen then the non-diastolicness and non-recessionariness is not true."
] | The non-diastolicness and non-recessionariness is not true if the caravanning doesn't happen. | that both the non-cogitativeness and the quadrille happens is incorrect. |
the diastolicness and the fulling happens. | sent1: the fact that that the rolling does not occur and the roughing intention does not occur is not right hold. sent2: the caravanning does not occur. sent3: the fact that the latestness does not occur and the gust does not occur is not true. sent4: the ripening ICU occurs and the synthesizing occurs. sent5: the assembly occurs. sent6: if the quadrille does not occur then the fullness occurs and the assembly happens. sent7: the roughing antineutron does not occur. sent8: that both the non-cogitativeness and the quadrille happens is incorrect. sent9: the fact that the ripening parakeet does not occur and the espionage does not occur is not true if the tightness does not occur. sent10: the elementariness does not occur. sent11: both the slavery and the unoriginalness happens. sent12: if the quadrille does not occur the assembly occurs. sent13: the resonance occurs and the impugning boneshaker occurs. sent14: if the caravanning does not occur then the fact that both the non-diastolicness and the non-recessionariness happens is not true. sent15: the ripening Hutton happens. sent16: the abranchiateness and the concretisticness happens. sent17: the fenestration does not occur. sent18: the quadrille does not occur if the fact that both the non-cogitativeness and the quadrille occurs does not hold. sent19: the main happens and the palatine happens if the maxillomandibularness does not occur. sent20: the tightness happens. | ({A} & {C}) | sent1: ¬(¬{BK} & ¬{EB}) sent2: ¬{F} sent3: ¬(¬{R} & ¬{GR}) sent4: ({EA} & {HD}) sent5: {D} sent6: ¬{E} -> ({C} & {D}) sent7: ¬{CK} sent8: ¬(¬{G} & {E}) sent9: ¬{EF} -> ¬(¬{BD} & ¬{IP}) sent10: ¬{BH} sent11: ({FI} & {DB}) sent12: ¬{E} -> {D} sent13: ({GQ} & {CR}) sent14: ¬{F} -> ¬(¬{A} & ¬{B}) sent15: {DN} sent16: ({FD} & {IT}) sent17: ¬{DF} sent18: ¬(¬{G} & {E}) -> ¬{E} sent19: ¬{HC} -> ({EM} & {JI}) sent20: {EF} | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the diastolicness does not occur.; sent14 & sent2 -> int1: that the non-diastolicness and the non-recessionaryness occurs is not true.; sent18 & sent8 -> int2: that the quadrille occurs is false.; sent6 & int2 -> int3: the fullness occurs and the assembly happens.; int3 -> int4: the fulling occurs.;"
] | UNKNOWN | [
"void -> assump1: ¬{A}; sent14 & sent2 -> int1: ¬(¬{A} & ¬{B}); sent18 & sent8 -> int2: ¬{E}; sent6 & int2 -> int3: ({C} & {D}); int3 -> int4: {C};"
] | UNKNOWN | 4 | null | 15 | 0 | 15 | the fact that the diastolicness occurs and the fullness happens is wrong. | ¬({A} & {C}) | 0 | [
" -> hypothesis;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the diastolicness and the fulling happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that that the rolling does not occur and the roughing intention does not occur is not right hold. sent2: the caravanning does not occur. sent3: the fact that the latestness does not occur and the gust does not occur is not true. sent4: the ripening ICU occurs and the synthesizing occurs. sent5: the assembly occurs. sent6: if the quadrille does not occur then the fullness occurs and the assembly happens. sent7: the roughing antineutron does not occur. sent8: that both the non-cogitativeness and the quadrille happens is incorrect. sent9: the fact that the ripening parakeet does not occur and the espionage does not occur is not true if the tightness does not occur. sent10: the elementariness does not occur. sent11: both the slavery and the unoriginalness happens. sent12: if the quadrille does not occur the assembly occurs. sent13: the resonance occurs and the impugning boneshaker occurs. sent14: if the caravanning does not occur then the fact that both the non-diastolicness and the non-recessionariness happens is not true. sent15: the ripening Hutton happens. sent16: the abranchiateness and the concretisticness happens. sent17: the fenestration does not occur. sent18: the quadrille does not occur if the fact that both the non-cogitativeness and the quadrille occurs does not hold. sent19: the main happens and the palatine happens if the maxillomandibularness does not occur. sent20: the tightness happens. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | if the caravanning does not occur then the fact that both the non-diastolicness and the non-recessionariness happens is not true. | [
"the caravanning does not occur.",
"the quadrille does not occur if the fact that both the non-cogitativeness and the quadrille occurs does not hold.",
"that both the non-cogitativeness and the quadrille happens is incorrect.",
"if the quadrille does not occur then the fullness occurs and the assembly happens."
] | [
"If the caravanning doesn't happen then the non-diastolicness and non-recessionariness isn't true.",
"If the caravanning doesn't happen, the non-diastolicness and non-recessionariness isn't true.",
"The non-diastolicness and non-recessionariness is not true if the caravanning doesn't happen.",
"If the caravanning doesn't happen then the non-diastolicness and non-recessionariness is not true."
] | If the caravanning doesn't happen then the non-diastolicness and non-recessionariness is not true. | if the quadrille does not occur then the fullness occurs and the assembly happens. |
the humectant impugns teacake and it is a farming. | sent1: if the burgess is not unhealthful then that the teacake does not rehear somatotype but it is a requisition is not correct. sent2: the burgess is not unhealthful. sent3: if the burgess is a kind of non-unhealthful thing that does not impugn teacake the fact that the humectant is not unhealthful is true. sent4: that something is a anxiousness and it does rehear somatotype does not hold if it is not unhealthful. sent5: if the fact that something is not a requisition hold it does not impugn teacake. sent6: if the teacake is not a requisition it does not impugn teacake. sent7: the fact that the humectant impugns teacake and it is a kind of a farming is not right if the teacake does not impugns teacake. sent8: something impugns pollinator if the fact that it is not a farming and it is not glossopharyngeal is not false. sent9: if something impugns pollinator it is not unhealthful and it does not impugn teacake. sent10: if that the burgess does not rough processional hold then it is both not a farming and not glossopharyngeal. sent11: if that something does not rehear somatotype but it is a requisition is incorrect then it does not impugn teacake. sent12: if the fact that something does not impugn pollinator and is not unhealthful does not hold then it impugns teacake. | ({B}{c} & {D}{c}) | sent1: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) sent2: ¬{A}{a} sent3: (¬{A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> ¬{A}{c} sent4: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({BI}x & {AA}x) sent5: (x): ¬{AB}x -> ¬{B}x sent6: ¬{AB}{b} -> ¬{B}{b} sent7: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬({B}{c} & {D}{c}) sent8: (x): (¬{D}x & ¬{E}x) -> {C}x sent9: (x): {C}x -> (¬{A}x & ¬{B}x) sent10: ¬{F}{a} -> (¬{D}{a} & ¬{E}{a}) sent11: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent12: (x): ¬(¬{C}x & ¬{A}x) -> {B}x | [
"sent1 & sent2 -> int1: that the teacake does not rehear somatotype and does requisition is false.; sent11 -> int2: if the fact that the teacake does not rehear somatotype but it requisitions is incorrect then it does not impugn teacake.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the teacake does not impugn teacake.; int3 & sent7 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent1 & sent2 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}); sent11 -> int2: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) -> ¬{B}{b}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ¬{B}{b}; int3 & sent7 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 3 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 8 | that the humectant does impugn teacake and it does farm is not wrong. | ({B}{c} & {D}{c}) | 4 | [
"sent12 -> int4: the fact that the fact that the humectant does not impugn teacake hold is incorrect if that it does not impugn pollinator and it is not unhealthful is not right.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the humectant impugns teacake and it is a farming. ; $context$ = sent1: if the burgess is not unhealthful then that the teacake does not rehear somatotype but it is a requisition is not correct. sent2: the burgess is not unhealthful. sent3: if the burgess is a kind of non-unhealthful thing that does not impugn teacake the fact that the humectant is not unhealthful is true. sent4: that something is a anxiousness and it does rehear somatotype does not hold if it is not unhealthful. sent5: if the fact that something is not a requisition hold it does not impugn teacake. sent6: if the teacake is not a requisition it does not impugn teacake. sent7: the fact that the humectant impugns teacake and it is a kind of a farming is not right if the teacake does not impugns teacake. sent8: something impugns pollinator if the fact that it is not a farming and it is not glossopharyngeal is not false. sent9: if something impugns pollinator it is not unhealthful and it does not impugn teacake. sent10: if that the burgess does not rough processional hold then it is both not a farming and not glossopharyngeal. sent11: if that something does not rehear somatotype but it is a requisition is incorrect then it does not impugn teacake. sent12: if the fact that something does not impugn pollinator and is not unhealthful does not hold then it impugns teacake. ; $proof$ = | sent1 & sent2 -> int1: that the teacake does not rehear somatotype and does requisition is false.; sent11 -> int2: if the fact that the teacake does not rehear somatotype but it requisitions is incorrect then it does not impugn teacake.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the teacake does not impugn teacake.; int3 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | if the burgess is not unhealthful then that the teacake does not rehear somatotype but it is a requisition is not correct. | [
"the burgess is not unhealthful.",
"if that something does not rehear somatotype but it is a requisition is incorrect then it does not impugn teacake.",
"the fact that the humectant impugns teacake and it is a kind of a farming is not right if the teacake does not impugns teacake."
] | [
"The teacake does not rehear somatotype if the burgess is not healthy.",
"The teacake does not rehear somatotype if the burgess is healthy.",
"The teacake does not rehear somatotype if the burgess is unhealthful."
] | The teacake does not rehear somatotype if the burgess is not healthy. | the burgess is not unhealthful. |
the humectant impugns teacake and it is a farming. | sent1: if the burgess is not unhealthful then that the teacake does not rehear somatotype but it is a requisition is not correct. sent2: the burgess is not unhealthful. sent3: if the burgess is a kind of non-unhealthful thing that does not impugn teacake the fact that the humectant is not unhealthful is true. sent4: that something is a anxiousness and it does rehear somatotype does not hold if it is not unhealthful. sent5: if the fact that something is not a requisition hold it does not impugn teacake. sent6: if the teacake is not a requisition it does not impugn teacake. sent7: the fact that the humectant impugns teacake and it is a kind of a farming is not right if the teacake does not impugns teacake. sent8: something impugns pollinator if the fact that it is not a farming and it is not glossopharyngeal is not false. sent9: if something impugns pollinator it is not unhealthful and it does not impugn teacake. sent10: if that the burgess does not rough processional hold then it is both not a farming and not glossopharyngeal. sent11: if that something does not rehear somatotype but it is a requisition is incorrect then it does not impugn teacake. sent12: if the fact that something does not impugn pollinator and is not unhealthful does not hold then it impugns teacake. | ({B}{c} & {D}{c}) | sent1: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) sent2: ¬{A}{a} sent3: (¬{A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> ¬{A}{c} sent4: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({BI}x & {AA}x) sent5: (x): ¬{AB}x -> ¬{B}x sent6: ¬{AB}{b} -> ¬{B}{b} sent7: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬({B}{c} & {D}{c}) sent8: (x): (¬{D}x & ¬{E}x) -> {C}x sent9: (x): {C}x -> (¬{A}x & ¬{B}x) sent10: ¬{F}{a} -> (¬{D}{a} & ¬{E}{a}) sent11: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent12: (x): ¬(¬{C}x & ¬{A}x) -> {B}x | [
"sent1 & sent2 -> int1: that the teacake does not rehear somatotype and does requisition is false.; sent11 -> int2: if the fact that the teacake does not rehear somatotype but it requisitions is incorrect then it does not impugn teacake.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the teacake does not impugn teacake.; int3 & sent7 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent1 & sent2 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}); sent11 -> int2: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) -> ¬{B}{b}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ¬{B}{b}; int3 & sent7 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 3 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 8 | that the humectant does impugn teacake and it does farm is not wrong. | ({B}{c} & {D}{c}) | 4 | [
"sent12 -> int4: the fact that the fact that the humectant does not impugn teacake hold is incorrect if that it does not impugn pollinator and it is not unhealthful is not right.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the humectant impugns teacake and it is a farming. ; $context$ = sent1: if the burgess is not unhealthful then that the teacake does not rehear somatotype but it is a requisition is not correct. sent2: the burgess is not unhealthful. sent3: if the burgess is a kind of non-unhealthful thing that does not impugn teacake the fact that the humectant is not unhealthful is true. sent4: that something is a anxiousness and it does rehear somatotype does not hold if it is not unhealthful. sent5: if the fact that something is not a requisition hold it does not impugn teacake. sent6: if the teacake is not a requisition it does not impugn teacake. sent7: the fact that the humectant impugns teacake and it is a kind of a farming is not right if the teacake does not impugns teacake. sent8: something impugns pollinator if the fact that it is not a farming and it is not glossopharyngeal is not false. sent9: if something impugns pollinator it is not unhealthful and it does not impugn teacake. sent10: if that the burgess does not rough processional hold then it is both not a farming and not glossopharyngeal. sent11: if that something does not rehear somatotype but it is a requisition is incorrect then it does not impugn teacake. sent12: if the fact that something does not impugn pollinator and is not unhealthful does not hold then it impugns teacake. ; $proof$ = | sent1 & sent2 -> int1: that the teacake does not rehear somatotype and does requisition is false.; sent11 -> int2: if the fact that the teacake does not rehear somatotype but it requisitions is incorrect then it does not impugn teacake.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the teacake does not impugn teacake.; int3 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | if the burgess is not unhealthful then that the teacake does not rehear somatotype but it is a requisition is not correct. | [
"the burgess is not unhealthful.",
"if that something does not rehear somatotype but it is a requisition is incorrect then it does not impugn teacake.",
"the fact that the humectant impugns teacake and it is a kind of a farming is not right if the teacake does not impugns teacake."
] | [
"The teacake does not rehear somatotype if the burgess is not healthy.",
"The teacake does not rehear somatotype if the burgess is healthy.",
"The teacake does not rehear somatotype if the burgess is unhealthful."
] | The teacake does not rehear somatotype if the burgess is healthy. | if that something does not rehear somatotype but it is a requisition is incorrect then it does not impugn teacake. |
the humectant impugns teacake and it is a farming. | sent1: if the burgess is not unhealthful then that the teacake does not rehear somatotype but it is a requisition is not correct. sent2: the burgess is not unhealthful. sent3: if the burgess is a kind of non-unhealthful thing that does not impugn teacake the fact that the humectant is not unhealthful is true. sent4: that something is a anxiousness and it does rehear somatotype does not hold if it is not unhealthful. sent5: if the fact that something is not a requisition hold it does not impugn teacake. sent6: if the teacake is not a requisition it does not impugn teacake. sent7: the fact that the humectant impugns teacake and it is a kind of a farming is not right if the teacake does not impugns teacake. sent8: something impugns pollinator if the fact that it is not a farming and it is not glossopharyngeal is not false. sent9: if something impugns pollinator it is not unhealthful and it does not impugn teacake. sent10: if that the burgess does not rough processional hold then it is both not a farming and not glossopharyngeal. sent11: if that something does not rehear somatotype but it is a requisition is incorrect then it does not impugn teacake. sent12: if the fact that something does not impugn pollinator and is not unhealthful does not hold then it impugns teacake. | ({B}{c} & {D}{c}) | sent1: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) sent2: ¬{A}{a} sent3: (¬{A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> ¬{A}{c} sent4: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({BI}x & {AA}x) sent5: (x): ¬{AB}x -> ¬{B}x sent6: ¬{AB}{b} -> ¬{B}{b} sent7: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬({B}{c} & {D}{c}) sent8: (x): (¬{D}x & ¬{E}x) -> {C}x sent9: (x): {C}x -> (¬{A}x & ¬{B}x) sent10: ¬{F}{a} -> (¬{D}{a} & ¬{E}{a}) sent11: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent12: (x): ¬(¬{C}x & ¬{A}x) -> {B}x | [
"sent1 & sent2 -> int1: that the teacake does not rehear somatotype and does requisition is false.; sent11 -> int2: if the fact that the teacake does not rehear somatotype but it requisitions is incorrect then it does not impugn teacake.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the teacake does not impugn teacake.; int3 & sent7 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent1 & sent2 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}); sent11 -> int2: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) -> ¬{B}{b}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ¬{B}{b}; int3 & sent7 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 3 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 8 | that the humectant does impugn teacake and it does farm is not wrong. | ({B}{c} & {D}{c}) | 4 | [
"sent12 -> int4: the fact that the fact that the humectant does not impugn teacake hold is incorrect if that it does not impugn pollinator and it is not unhealthful is not right.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the humectant impugns teacake and it is a farming. ; $context$ = sent1: if the burgess is not unhealthful then that the teacake does not rehear somatotype but it is a requisition is not correct. sent2: the burgess is not unhealthful. sent3: if the burgess is a kind of non-unhealthful thing that does not impugn teacake the fact that the humectant is not unhealthful is true. sent4: that something is a anxiousness and it does rehear somatotype does not hold if it is not unhealthful. sent5: if the fact that something is not a requisition hold it does not impugn teacake. sent6: if the teacake is not a requisition it does not impugn teacake. sent7: the fact that the humectant impugns teacake and it is a kind of a farming is not right if the teacake does not impugns teacake. sent8: something impugns pollinator if the fact that it is not a farming and it is not glossopharyngeal is not false. sent9: if something impugns pollinator it is not unhealthful and it does not impugn teacake. sent10: if that the burgess does not rough processional hold then it is both not a farming and not glossopharyngeal. sent11: if that something does not rehear somatotype but it is a requisition is incorrect then it does not impugn teacake. sent12: if the fact that something does not impugn pollinator and is not unhealthful does not hold then it impugns teacake. ; $proof$ = | sent1 & sent2 -> int1: that the teacake does not rehear somatotype and does requisition is false.; sent11 -> int2: if the fact that the teacake does not rehear somatotype but it requisitions is incorrect then it does not impugn teacake.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the teacake does not impugn teacake.; int3 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | if the burgess is not unhealthful then that the teacake does not rehear somatotype but it is a requisition is not correct. | [
"the burgess is not unhealthful.",
"if that something does not rehear somatotype but it is a requisition is incorrect then it does not impugn teacake.",
"the fact that the humectant impugns teacake and it is a kind of a farming is not right if the teacake does not impugns teacake."
] | [
"The teacake does not rehear somatotype if the burgess is not healthy.",
"The teacake does not rehear somatotype if the burgess is healthy.",
"The teacake does not rehear somatotype if the burgess is unhealthful."
] | The teacake does not rehear somatotype if the burgess is unhealthful. | the fact that the humectant impugns teacake and it is a kind of a farming is not right if the teacake does not impugns teacake. |
the reformer is not malodorous. | sent1: the reformer is holophytic if there is something such that the fact that it is not excusable and it is non-malodorous is wrong. sent2: if there is something such that that it is not holophytic and it is inexcusable is incorrect the reformer is malodorous. sent3: if that the PO is both not a breadstick and malodorous hold then the succinylcholine is not a breadstick. sent4: the fact that the PO is a kind of holophytic thing that is not excusable does not hold. sent5: the fact that something is not a graphology and it is equal is incorrect if it is not a breadstick. sent6: if something either does not impugn somatotype or is a breadstick or both it is not malodorous. sent7: that the PO is both not holophytic and excusable is false. sent8: the fact that the syrinx is both not a mauve and not a carousel is incorrect. sent9: that the PO is not holophytic and is not excusable is not correct if it is not a breadstick. sent10: there is something such that the fact that it does not rough tod and is not non-hypoglycemic is false. sent11: the PO is not a kind of a breadstick. | ¬{B}{b} | sent1: (x): ¬(¬{AB}x & ¬{B}x) -> {AA}{b} sent2: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}{b} sent3: (¬{A}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{A}{eu} sent4: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent5: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{FU}x & ¬{T}x) sent6: (x): (¬{C}x v {A}x) -> ¬{B}x sent7: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent8: ¬(¬{HE}{ac} & ¬{DS}{ac}) sent9: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent10: (Ex): ¬(¬{HL}x & {HI}x) sent11: ¬{A}{a} | [
"sent9 & sent11 -> int1: that the PO is not holophytic and it is not excusable does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that the fact that it is not holophytic and is not excusable is wrong.; int2 & sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent9 & sent11 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}); int1 -> int2: (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x); int2 & sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 3 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 8 | the fact that the reformer is not malodorous is true. | ¬{B}{b} | 5 | [
"sent6 -> int3: if the reformer does not impugn somatotype and/or it is a kind of a breadstick it is not malodorous.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the reformer is not malodorous. ; $context$ = sent1: the reformer is holophytic if there is something such that the fact that it is not excusable and it is non-malodorous is wrong. sent2: if there is something such that that it is not holophytic and it is inexcusable is incorrect the reformer is malodorous. sent3: if that the PO is both not a breadstick and malodorous hold then the succinylcholine is not a breadstick. sent4: the fact that the PO is a kind of holophytic thing that is not excusable does not hold. sent5: the fact that something is not a graphology and it is equal is incorrect if it is not a breadstick. sent6: if something either does not impugn somatotype or is a breadstick or both it is not malodorous. sent7: that the PO is both not holophytic and excusable is false. sent8: the fact that the syrinx is both not a mauve and not a carousel is incorrect. sent9: that the PO is not holophytic and is not excusable is not correct if it is not a breadstick. sent10: there is something such that the fact that it does not rough tod and is not non-hypoglycemic is false. sent11: the PO is not a kind of a breadstick. ; $proof$ = | sent9 & sent11 -> int1: that the PO is not holophytic and it is not excusable does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that the fact that it is not holophytic and is not excusable is wrong.; int2 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | that the PO is not holophytic and is not excusable is not correct if it is not a breadstick. | [
"the PO is not a kind of a breadstick.",
"if there is something such that that it is not holophytic and it is inexcusable is incorrect the reformer is malodorous."
] | [
"The PO is not excusable if it is not a breadstick.",
"If the PO is not a breadstick, it is not correct."
] | The PO is not excusable if it is not a breadstick. | the PO is not a kind of a breadstick. |
the reformer is not malodorous. | sent1: the reformer is holophytic if there is something such that the fact that it is not excusable and it is non-malodorous is wrong. sent2: if there is something such that that it is not holophytic and it is inexcusable is incorrect the reformer is malodorous. sent3: if that the PO is both not a breadstick and malodorous hold then the succinylcholine is not a breadstick. sent4: the fact that the PO is a kind of holophytic thing that is not excusable does not hold. sent5: the fact that something is not a graphology and it is equal is incorrect if it is not a breadstick. sent6: if something either does not impugn somatotype or is a breadstick or both it is not malodorous. sent7: that the PO is both not holophytic and excusable is false. sent8: the fact that the syrinx is both not a mauve and not a carousel is incorrect. sent9: that the PO is not holophytic and is not excusable is not correct if it is not a breadstick. sent10: there is something such that the fact that it does not rough tod and is not non-hypoglycemic is false. sent11: the PO is not a kind of a breadstick. | ¬{B}{b} | sent1: (x): ¬(¬{AB}x & ¬{B}x) -> {AA}{b} sent2: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}{b} sent3: (¬{A}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{A}{eu} sent4: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent5: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{FU}x & ¬{T}x) sent6: (x): (¬{C}x v {A}x) -> ¬{B}x sent7: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent8: ¬(¬{HE}{ac} & ¬{DS}{ac}) sent9: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent10: (Ex): ¬(¬{HL}x & {HI}x) sent11: ¬{A}{a} | [
"sent9 & sent11 -> int1: that the PO is not holophytic and it is not excusable does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that the fact that it is not holophytic and is not excusable is wrong.; int2 & sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent9 & sent11 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}); int1 -> int2: (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x); int2 & sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 3 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 8 | the fact that the reformer is not malodorous is true. | ¬{B}{b} | 5 | [
"sent6 -> int3: if the reformer does not impugn somatotype and/or it is a kind of a breadstick it is not malodorous.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the reformer is not malodorous. ; $context$ = sent1: the reformer is holophytic if there is something such that the fact that it is not excusable and it is non-malodorous is wrong. sent2: if there is something such that that it is not holophytic and it is inexcusable is incorrect the reformer is malodorous. sent3: if that the PO is both not a breadstick and malodorous hold then the succinylcholine is not a breadstick. sent4: the fact that the PO is a kind of holophytic thing that is not excusable does not hold. sent5: the fact that something is not a graphology and it is equal is incorrect if it is not a breadstick. sent6: if something either does not impugn somatotype or is a breadstick or both it is not malodorous. sent7: that the PO is both not holophytic and excusable is false. sent8: the fact that the syrinx is both not a mauve and not a carousel is incorrect. sent9: that the PO is not holophytic and is not excusable is not correct if it is not a breadstick. sent10: there is something such that the fact that it does not rough tod and is not non-hypoglycemic is false. sent11: the PO is not a kind of a breadstick. ; $proof$ = | sent9 & sent11 -> int1: that the PO is not holophytic and it is not excusable does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that the fact that it is not holophytic and is not excusable is wrong.; int2 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | that the PO is not holophytic and is not excusable is not correct if it is not a breadstick. | [
"the PO is not a kind of a breadstick.",
"if there is something such that that it is not holophytic and it is inexcusable is incorrect the reformer is malodorous."
] | [
"The PO is not excusable if it is not a breadstick.",
"If the PO is not a breadstick, it is not correct."
] | If the PO is not a breadstick, it is not correct. | if there is something such that that it is not holophytic and it is inexcusable is incorrect the reformer is malodorous. |
the alcohol is not permissive. | sent1: the alcohol is random thing that is not aerolitic. sent2: something is random but it is not bicylindrical if it is not a kind of a Sikh. sent3: there exists something such that it is a Sikh. sent4: the alcohol is a mandrake but it does not stabilize. sent5: something is a kind of a Chrysophyllum. sent6: there are permissive and numeral things. sent7: the nine is a complaisance and is not a visualization. sent8: the felloe is not Sikh if the fact that either the nine is not a Sikh or it is not a kind of a numeral or both does not hold. sent9: the alcohol is a Calgary if something is permissive. sent10: something is aerolitic. sent11: the nine is a numeral but it is not random if there exists something such that it is a Sikh. | ¬{D}{b} | sent1: ({C}{b} & ¬{U}{b}) sent2: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({C}x & ¬{EK}x) sent3: (Ex): {A}x sent4: ({HL}{b} & ¬{IT}{b}) sent5: (Ex): {AQ}x sent6: (Ex): ({D}x & {B}x) sent7: ({DD}{a} & ¬{HB}{a}) sent8: ¬(¬{A}{a} v ¬{B}{a}) -> ¬{A}{dd} sent9: (x): {D}x -> {FU}{b} sent10: (Ex): {U}x sent11: (x): {A}x -> ({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) | [
"sent3 & sent11 -> int1: the nine is a numeral but it is not random.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is numeral thing that is not random.;"
] | UNKNOWN | [
"sent3 & sent11 -> int1: ({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}); int1 -> int2: (Ex): ({B}x & ¬{C}x);"
] | UNKNOWN | 3 | null | 9 | 0 | 9 | the felloe is random but it is not bicylindrical. | ({C}{dd} & ¬{EK}{dd}) | 5 | [
"sent2 -> int3: the felloe is not nonrandom but non-bicylindrical if it is not Sikh.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the alcohol is not permissive. ; $context$ = sent1: the alcohol is random thing that is not aerolitic. sent2: something is random but it is not bicylindrical if it is not a kind of a Sikh. sent3: there exists something such that it is a Sikh. sent4: the alcohol is a mandrake but it does not stabilize. sent5: something is a kind of a Chrysophyllum. sent6: there are permissive and numeral things. sent7: the nine is a complaisance and is not a visualization. sent8: the felloe is not Sikh if the fact that either the nine is not a Sikh or it is not a kind of a numeral or both does not hold. sent9: the alcohol is a Calgary if something is permissive. sent10: something is aerolitic. sent11: the nine is a numeral but it is not random if there exists something such that it is a Sikh. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | there exists something such that it is a Sikh. | [
"the nine is a numeral but it is not random if there exists something such that it is a Sikh."
] | [
"there exists something such that it is a Sikh."
] | there exists something such that it is a Sikh. | the nine is a numeral but it is not random if there exists something such that it is a Sikh. |
the stylet is not a mother. | sent1: the stylet is not a dissimilation if it is starchless and does not procure. sent2: if something is not a dissimilation then it is a mother and it does rough strabismus. sent3: that the stylet does not mother hold if the fact that the cauliflower is a dissimilation or it does not procure or both does not hold. sent4: the fact that the stylet is starchless but it does not procure is right. | ¬{AA}{aa} | sent1: ({C}{aa} & ¬{B}{aa}) -> ¬{A}{aa} sent2: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({AA}x & {AB}x) sent3: ¬({A}{a} v ¬{B}{a}) -> ¬{AA}{aa} sent4: ({C}{aa} & ¬{B}{aa}) | [
"sent2 -> int1: if the stylet is not a kind of a dissimilation then it does mother and roughs strabismus.; sent1 & sent4 -> int2: the stylet is not a dissimilation.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the stylet is a kind of a mother and it roughs strabismus.; int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent2 -> int1: ¬{A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}); sent1 & sent4 -> int2: ¬{A}{aa}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}); int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | the stylet is not a mother. | ¬{AA}{aa} | 5 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the stylet is not a mother. ; $context$ = sent1: the stylet is not a dissimilation if it is starchless and does not procure. sent2: if something is not a dissimilation then it is a mother and it does rough strabismus. sent3: that the stylet does not mother hold if the fact that the cauliflower is a dissimilation or it does not procure or both does not hold. sent4: the fact that the stylet is starchless but it does not procure is right. ; $proof$ = | sent2 -> int1: if the stylet is not a kind of a dissimilation then it does mother and roughs strabismus.; sent1 & sent4 -> int2: the stylet is not a dissimilation.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the stylet is a kind of a mother and it roughs strabismus.; int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | if something is not a dissimilation then it is a mother and it does rough strabismus. | [
"the stylet is not a dissimilation if it is starchless and does not procure.",
"the fact that the stylet is starchless but it does not procure is right."
] | [
"It is a mother and she does rough strabismus if something is not a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for",
"It is a mother and it does rough strabismus if something is not a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for"
] | It is a mother and she does rough strabismus if something is not a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for | the stylet is not a dissimilation if it is starchless and does not procure. |
the stylet is not a mother. | sent1: the stylet is not a dissimilation if it is starchless and does not procure. sent2: if something is not a dissimilation then it is a mother and it does rough strabismus. sent3: that the stylet does not mother hold if the fact that the cauliflower is a dissimilation or it does not procure or both does not hold. sent4: the fact that the stylet is starchless but it does not procure is right. | ¬{AA}{aa} | sent1: ({C}{aa} & ¬{B}{aa}) -> ¬{A}{aa} sent2: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({AA}x & {AB}x) sent3: ¬({A}{a} v ¬{B}{a}) -> ¬{AA}{aa} sent4: ({C}{aa} & ¬{B}{aa}) | [
"sent2 -> int1: if the stylet is not a kind of a dissimilation then it does mother and roughs strabismus.; sent1 & sent4 -> int2: the stylet is not a dissimilation.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the stylet is a kind of a mother and it roughs strabismus.; int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent2 -> int1: ¬{A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}); sent1 & sent4 -> int2: ¬{A}{aa}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}); int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | the stylet is not a mother. | ¬{AA}{aa} | 5 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the stylet is not a mother. ; $context$ = sent1: the stylet is not a dissimilation if it is starchless and does not procure. sent2: if something is not a dissimilation then it is a mother and it does rough strabismus. sent3: that the stylet does not mother hold if the fact that the cauliflower is a dissimilation or it does not procure or both does not hold. sent4: the fact that the stylet is starchless but it does not procure is right. ; $proof$ = | sent2 -> int1: if the stylet is not a kind of a dissimilation then it does mother and roughs strabismus.; sent1 & sent4 -> int2: the stylet is not a dissimilation.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the stylet is a kind of a mother and it roughs strabismus.; int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | if something is not a dissimilation then it is a mother and it does rough strabismus. | [
"the stylet is not a dissimilation if it is starchless and does not procure.",
"the fact that the stylet is starchless but it does not procure is right."
] | [
"It is a mother and she does rough strabismus if something is not a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for",
"It is a mother and it does rough strabismus if something is not a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for"
] | It is a mother and it does rough strabismus if something is not a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for a synonym for | the fact that the stylet is starchless but it does not procure is right. |
the column does rough tribadism. | sent1: if that the column is not electrocardiographic but it is a kind of a occiput is not true it does not rough Ornithogalum. sent2: the column does not rough Ornithogalum if it is electrocardiographic. sent3: the vole does untie. sent4: the vole is not a kind of a horsemeat if it is not piscatorial. sent5: the column does not rough tribadism if it does not rough Ornithogalum. sent6: the manikin does not untie. sent7: the fact that the column is not electrocardiographic but it is a kind of a occiput does not hold if the vole unties. sent8: if the column does untie then that the vole roughs Ornithogalum and it is electrocardiographic does not hold. sent9: if something is implacable and it does rehear manicure then it does not rough Ornithogalum. | {C}{b} | sent1: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) -> ¬{B}{b} sent2: {AA}{b} -> ¬{B}{b} sent3: {A}{a} sent4: ¬{HG}{a} -> ¬{BA}{a} sent5: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬{C}{b} sent6: ¬{A}{is} sent7: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) sent8: {A}{b} -> ¬({B}{a} & {AA}{a}) sent9: (x): ({E}x & {D}x) -> ¬{B}x | [
"sent7 & sent3 -> int1: that the column is a kind of non-electrocardiographic thing that is a occiput is not correct.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the column does not rough Ornithogalum.; int2 & sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent7 & sent3 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}); int1 & sent1 -> int2: ¬{B}{b}; int2 & sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 3 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 5 | the excelsior does not rough tribadism. | ¬{C}{hl} | 5 | [
"sent9 -> int3: the vole does not rough Ornithogalum if it is a kind of implacable thing that does rehear manicure.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the column does rough tribadism. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the column is not electrocardiographic but it is a kind of a occiput is not true it does not rough Ornithogalum. sent2: the column does not rough Ornithogalum if it is electrocardiographic. sent3: the vole does untie. sent4: the vole is not a kind of a horsemeat if it is not piscatorial. sent5: the column does not rough tribadism if it does not rough Ornithogalum. sent6: the manikin does not untie. sent7: the fact that the column is not electrocardiographic but it is a kind of a occiput does not hold if the vole unties. sent8: if the column does untie then that the vole roughs Ornithogalum and it is electrocardiographic does not hold. sent9: if something is implacable and it does rehear manicure then it does not rough Ornithogalum. ; $proof$ = | sent7 & sent3 -> int1: that the column is a kind of non-electrocardiographic thing that is a occiput is not correct.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the column does not rough Ornithogalum.; int2 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the fact that the column is not electrocardiographic but it is a kind of a occiput does not hold if the vole unties. | [
"the vole does untie.",
"if that the column is not electrocardiographic but it is a kind of a occiput is not true it does not rough Ornithogalum.",
"the column does not rough tribadism if it does not rough Ornithogalum."
] | [
"The column is a kind of occiput that does not hold if the vole unties.",
"The column is a type of occiput that does not hold if the vole unties.",
"The column is not an occiput if the vole unties."
] | The column is a kind of occiput that does not hold if the vole unties. | the vole does untie. |
the column does rough tribadism. | sent1: if that the column is not electrocardiographic but it is a kind of a occiput is not true it does not rough Ornithogalum. sent2: the column does not rough Ornithogalum if it is electrocardiographic. sent3: the vole does untie. sent4: the vole is not a kind of a horsemeat if it is not piscatorial. sent5: the column does not rough tribadism if it does not rough Ornithogalum. sent6: the manikin does not untie. sent7: the fact that the column is not electrocardiographic but it is a kind of a occiput does not hold if the vole unties. sent8: if the column does untie then that the vole roughs Ornithogalum and it is electrocardiographic does not hold. sent9: if something is implacable and it does rehear manicure then it does not rough Ornithogalum. | {C}{b} | sent1: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) -> ¬{B}{b} sent2: {AA}{b} -> ¬{B}{b} sent3: {A}{a} sent4: ¬{HG}{a} -> ¬{BA}{a} sent5: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬{C}{b} sent6: ¬{A}{is} sent7: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) sent8: {A}{b} -> ¬({B}{a} & {AA}{a}) sent9: (x): ({E}x & {D}x) -> ¬{B}x | [
"sent7 & sent3 -> int1: that the column is a kind of non-electrocardiographic thing that is a occiput is not correct.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the column does not rough Ornithogalum.; int2 & sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent7 & sent3 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}); int1 & sent1 -> int2: ¬{B}{b}; int2 & sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 3 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 5 | the excelsior does not rough tribadism. | ¬{C}{hl} | 5 | [
"sent9 -> int3: the vole does not rough Ornithogalum if it is a kind of implacable thing that does rehear manicure.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the column does rough tribadism. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the column is not electrocardiographic but it is a kind of a occiput is not true it does not rough Ornithogalum. sent2: the column does not rough Ornithogalum if it is electrocardiographic. sent3: the vole does untie. sent4: the vole is not a kind of a horsemeat if it is not piscatorial. sent5: the column does not rough tribadism if it does not rough Ornithogalum. sent6: the manikin does not untie. sent7: the fact that the column is not electrocardiographic but it is a kind of a occiput does not hold if the vole unties. sent8: if the column does untie then that the vole roughs Ornithogalum and it is electrocardiographic does not hold. sent9: if something is implacable and it does rehear manicure then it does not rough Ornithogalum. ; $proof$ = | sent7 & sent3 -> int1: that the column is a kind of non-electrocardiographic thing that is a occiput is not correct.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the column does not rough Ornithogalum.; int2 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the fact that the column is not electrocardiographic but it is a kind of a occiput does not hold if the vole unties. | [
"the vole does untie.",
"if that the column is not electrocardiographic but it is a kind of a occiput is not true it does not rough Ornithogalum.",
"the column does not rough tribadism if it does not rough Ornithogalum."
] | [
"The column is a kind of occiput that does not hold if the vole unties.",
"The column is a type of occiput that does not hold if the vole unties.",
"The column is not an occiput if the vole unties."
] | The column is a type of occiput that does not hold if the vole unties. | if that the column is not electrocardiographic but it is a kind of a occiput is not true it does not rough Ornithogalum. |
the column does rough tribadism. | sent1: if that the column is not electrocardiographic but it is a kind of a occiput is not true it does not rough Ornithogalum. sent2: the column does not rough Ornithogalum if it is electrocardiographic. sent3: the vole does untie. sent4: the vole is not a kind of a horsemeat if it is not piscatorial. sent5: the column does not rough tribadism if it does not rough Ornithogalum. sent6: the manikin does not untie. sent7: the fact that the column is not electrocardiographic but it is a kind of a occiput does not hold if the vole unties. sent8: if the column does untie then that the vole roughs Ornithogalum and it is electrocardiographic does not hold. sent9: if something is implacable and it does rehear manicure then it does not rough Ornithogalum. | {C}{b} | sent1: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) -> ¬{B}{b} sent2: {AA}{b} -> ¬{B}{b} sent3: {A}{a} sent4: ¬{HG}{a} -> ¬{BA}{a} sent5: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬{C}{b} sent6: ¬{A}{is} sent7: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) sent8: {A}{b} -> ¬({B}{a} & {AA}{a}) sent9: (x): ({E}x & {D}x) -> ¬{B}x | [
"sent7 & sent3 -> int1: that the column is a kind of non-electrocardiographic thing that is a occiput is not correct.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the column does not rough Ornithogalum.; int2 & sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent7 & sent3 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}); int1 & sent1 -> int2: ¬{B}{b}; int2 & sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 3 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 5 | the excelsior does not rough tribadism. | ¬{C}{hl} | 5 | [
"sent9 -> int3: the vole does not rough Ornithogalum if it is a kind of implacable thing that does rehear manicure.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the column does rough tribadism. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the column is not electrocardiographic but it is a kind of a occiput is not true it does not rough Ornithogalum. sent2: the column does not rough Ornithogalum if it is electrocardiographic. sent3: the vole does untie. sent4: the vole is not a kind of a horsemeat if it is not piscatorial. sent5: the column does not rough tribadism if it does not rough Ornithogalum. sent6: the manikin does not untie. sent7: the fact that the column is not electrocardiographic but it is a kind of a occiput does not hold if the vole unties. sent8: if the column does untie then that the vole roughs Ornithogalum and it is electrocardiographic does not hold. sent9: if something is implacable and it does rehear manicure then it does not rough Ornithogalum. ; $proof$ = | sent7 & sent3 -> int1: that the column is a kind of non-electrocardiographic thing that is a occiput is not correct.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the column does not rough Ornithogalum.; int2 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the fact that the column is not electrocardiographic but it is a kind of a occiput does not hold if the vole unties. | [
"the vole does untie.",
"if that the column is not electrocardiographic but it is a kind of a occiput is not true it does not rough Ornithogalum.",
"the column does not rough tribadism if it does not rough Ornithogalum."
] | [
"The column is a kind of occiput that does not hold if the vole unties.",
"The column is a type of occiput that does not hold if the vole unties.",
"The column is not an occiput if the vole unties."
] | The column is not an occiput if the vole unties. | the column does not rough tribadism if it does not rough Ornithogalum. |
the groundsheet is factory-made. | sent1: the groundsheet is factory-made if the fact that the marchioness does gentle is right. sent2: if the friar's-cowl is not a pannier that the muslin is not evening and is not a Meridian is not true. sent3: something is not hadal if it is non-poetics thing that is not non-relative. sent4: that the marchioness rehears Clitocybe and is not factory-made is not correct. sent5: if the muslin is not a executant the backdoor does not delete and is not a whitewashed. sent6: the marchioness is factory-made. sent7: if the marchioness is a moppet then the fact that it does impugn homeliness and gentles does not hold. sent8: that something is a kind of a moppet and it is centigrade is not true if it is not hadal. sent9: something is both non-poetics and not non-relative if the fact that it is not microcosmic is not false. sent10: if something is a kind of a moppet then that it does impugn homeliness and it does gentle is not right. sent11: something is not a executant if the fact that it is a kind of non-evening thing that is not a Meridian does not hold. sent12: the marchioness does rough Tineidae. sent13: the burgess is a moppet and it rehears sierra. sent14: something is not microcosmic if it does not delete and it is not a whitewashed. sent15: the friar's-cowl is not a pannier. sent16: the stave is centigrade. sent17: the marchioness is centigrade. sent18: the fact that the marchioness is a kind of a moppet and it is centigrade is correct. sent19: the marchioness is centigrade and it is factory-made. sent20: if the fact that the marchioness does impugn homeliness and does not gentle is not right the groundsheet is factory-made. sent21: that the cholla is invisible but it does not ripen burgess is false if it is dimorphic. sent22: that the marchioness does impugn homeliness and it does gentle is not right. sent23: if something is a moppet that it does impugn homeliness and does not gentle does not hold. | {B}{a} | sent1: {AB}{aa} -> {B}{a} sent2: ¬{M}{d} -> ¬(¬{L}{c} & ¬{K}{c}) sent3: (x): (¬{F}x & {E}x) -> ¬{D}x sent4: ¬({HF}{aa} & ¬{B}{aa}) sent5: ¬{J}{c} -> (¬{I}{b} & ¬{H}{b}) sent6: {B}{aa} sent7: {A}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent8: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬({A}x & {C}x) sent9: (x): ¬{G}x -> (¬{F}x & {E}x) sent10: (x): {A}x -> ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) sent11: (x): ¬(¬{L}x & ¬{K}x) -> ¬{J}x sent12: {FU}{aa} sent13: ({A}{cc} & {O}{cc}) sent14: (x): (¬{I}x & ¬{H}x) -> ¬{G}x sent15: ¬{M}{d} sent16: {C}{bf} sent17: {C}{aa} sent18: ({A}{aa} & {C}{aa}) sent19: ({C}{aa} & {B}{aa}) sent20: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{a} sent21: {HM}{h} -> ¬({EP}{h} & ¬{FQ}{h}) sent22: ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent23: (x): {A}x -> ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) | [
"sent23 -> int1: that the marchioness impugns homeliness and does not gentle is not right if it is a moppet.; sent18 -> int2: the marchioness is a kind of a moppet.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the marchioness does impugn homeliness but it does not gentle is not true.; int3 & sent20 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent23 -> int1: {A}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}); sent18 -> int2: {A}{aa}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}); int3 & sent20 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 3 | 3 | 20 | 0 | 20 | the groundsheet is not factory-made. | ¬{B}{a} | 9 | [
"sent8 -> int4: if the backdoor is not hadal then that it is a kind of a moppet and it is centigrade is false.; sent3 -> int5: the backdoor is not hadal if it is not poetics and is a kind of a relative.; sent9 -> int6: the backdoor is both non-poetics and not non-relative if it is not microcosmic.; sent14 -> int7: the fact that the backdoor is not microcosmic is not false if it does not delete and it is not a whitewashed.; sent11 -> int8: if the fact that the muslin is both non-evening and not a Meridian is false it is not a executant.; sent2 & sent15 -> int9: the fact that the muslin is both not evening and not a Meridian is not right.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the muslin is not a executant.; sent5 & int10 -> int11: the backdoor does not delete and it does not whitewash.; int7 & int11 -> int12: the backdoor is not microcosmic.; int6 & int12 -> int13: the backdoor is non-poetics thing that is a relative.; int5 & int13 -> int14: the backdoor is not hadal.; int4 & int14 -> int15: that the backdoor is both a moppet and centigrade is false.; int15 -> int16: there is something such that the fact that it is a moppet and is centigrade is not right.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the groundsheet is factory-made. ; $context$ = sent1: the groundsheet is factory-made if the fact that the marchioness does gentle is right. sent2: if the friar's-cowl is not a pannier that the muslin is not evening and is not a Meridian is not true. sent3: something is not hadal if it is non-poetics thing that is not non-relative. sent4: that the marchioness rehears Clitocybe and is not factory-made is not correct. sent5: if the muslin is not a executant the backdoor does not delete and is not a whitewashed. sent6: the marchioness is factory-made. sent7: if the marchioness is a moppet then the fact that it does impugn homeliness and gentles does not hold. sent8: that something is a kind of a moppet and it is centigrade is not true if it is not hadal. sent9: something is both non-poetics and not non-relative if the fact that it is not microcosmic is not false. sent10: if something is a kind of a moppet then that it does impugn homeliness and it does gentle is not right. sent11: something is not a executant if the fact that it is a kind of non-evening thing that is not a Meridian does not hold. sent12: the marchioness does rough Tineidae. sent13: the burgess is a moppet and it rehears sierra. sent14: something is not microcosmic if it does not delete and it is not a whitewashed. sent15: the friar's-cowl is not a pannier. sent16: the stave is centigrade. sent17: the marchioness is centigrade. sent18: the fact that the marchioness is a kind of a moppet and it is centigrade is correct. sent19: the marchioness is centigrade and it is factory-made. sent20: if the fact that the marchioness does impugn homeliness and does not gentle is not right the groundsheet is factory-made. sent21: that the cholla is invisible but it does not ripen burgess is false if it is dimorphic. sent22: that the marchioness does impugn homeliness and it does gentle is not right. sent23: if something is a moppet that it does impugn homeliness and does not gentle does not hold. ; $proof$ = | sent23 -> int1: that the marchioness impugns homeliness and does not gentle is not right if it is a moppet.; sent18 -> int2: the marchioness is a kind of a moppet.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the marchioness does impugn homeliness but it does not gentle is not true.; int3 & sent20 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | if something is a moppet that it does impugn homeliness and does not gentle does not hold. | [
"the fact that the marchioness is a kind of a moppet and it is centigrade is correct.",
"if the fact that the marchioness does impugn homeliness and does not gentle is not right the groundsheet is factory-made."
] | [
"It doesn't hold if something is a moppet and it does impugn homeliness.",
"If something is a moppet, it does impugn homeliness and does not hold."
] | It doesn't hold if something is a moppet and it does impugn homeliness. | the fact that the marchioness is a kind of a moppet and it is centigrade is correct. |
the groundsheet is factory-made. | sent1: the groundsheet is factory-made if the fact that the marchioness does gentle is right. sent2: if the friar's-cowl is not a pannier that the muslin is not evening and is not a Meridian is not true. sent3: something is not hadal if it is non-poetics thing that is not non-relative. sent4: that the marchioness rehears Clitocybe and is not factory-made is not correct. sent5: if the muslin is not a executant the backdoor does not delete and is not a whitewashed. sent6: the marchioness is factory-made. sent7: if the marchioness is a moppet then the fact that it does impugn homeliness and gentles does not hold. sent8: that something is a kind of a moppet and it is centigrade is not true if it is not hadal. sent9: something is both non-poetics and not non-relative if the fact that it is not microcosmic is not false. sent10: if something is a kind of a moppet then that it does impugn homeliness and it does gentle is not right. sent11: something is not a executant if the fact that it is a kind of non-evening thing that is not a Meridian does not hold. sent12: the marchioness does rough Tineidae. sent13: the burgess is a moppet and it rehears sierra. sent14: something is not microcosmic if it does not delete and it is not a whitewashed. sent15: the friar's-cowl is not a pannier. sent16: the stave is centigrade. sent17: the marchioness is centigrade. sent18: the fact that the marchioness is a kind of a moppet and it is centigrade is correct. sent19: the marchioness is centigrade and it is factory-made. sent20: if the fact that the marchioness does impugn homeliness and does not gentle is not right the groundsheet is factory-made. sent21: that the cholla is invisible but it does not ripen burgess is false if it is dimorphic. sent22: that the marchioness does impugn homeliness and it does gentle is not right. sent23: if something is a moppet that it does impugn homeliness and does not gentle does not hold. | {B}{a} | sent1: {AB}{aa} -> {B}{a} sent2: ¬{M}{d} -> ¬(¬{L}{c} & ¬{K}{c}) sent3: (x): (¬{F}x & {E}x) -> ¬{D}x sent4: ¬({HF}{aa} & ¬{B}{aa}) sent5: ¬{J}{c} -> (¬{I}{b} & ¬{H}{b}) sent6: {B}{aa} sent7: {A}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent8: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬({A}x & {C}x) sent9: (x): ¬{G}x -> (¬{F}x & {E}x) sent10: (x): {A}x -> ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) sent11: (x): ¬(¬{L}x & ¬{K}x) -> ¬{J}x sent12: {FU}{aa} sent13: ({A}{cc} & {O}{cc}) sent14: (x): (¬{I}x & ¬{H}x) -> ¬{G}x sent15: ¬{M}{d} sent16: {C}{bf} sent17: {C}{aa} sent18: ({A}{aa} & {C}{aa}) sent19: ({C}{aa} & {B}{aa}) sent20: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{a} sent21: {HM}{h} -> ¬({EP}{h} & ¬{FQ}{h}) sent22: ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent23: (x): {A}x -> ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) | [
"sent23 -> int1: that the marchioness impugns homeliness and does not gentle is not right if it is a moppet.; sent18 -> int2: the marchioness is a kind of a moppet.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the marchioness does impugn homeliness but it does not gentle is not true.; int3 & sent20 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent23 -> int1: {A}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}); sent18 -> int2: {A}{aa}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}); int3 & sent20 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 3 | 3 | 20 | 0 | 20 | the groundsheet is not factory-made. | ¬{B}{a} | 9 | [
"sent8 -> int4: if the backdoor is not hadal then that it is a kind of a moppet and it is centigrade is false.; sent3 -> int5: the backdoor is not hadal if it is not poetics and is a kind of a relative.; sent9 -> int6: the backdoor is both non-poetics and not non-relative if it is not microcosmic.; sent14 -> int7: the fact that the backdoor is not microcosmic is not false if it does not delete and it is not a whitewashed.; sent11 -> int8: if the fact that the muslin is both non-evening and not a Meridian is false it is not a executant.; sent2 & sent15 -> int9: the fact that the muslin is both not evening and not a Meridian is not right.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the muslin is not a executant.; sent5 & int10 -> int11: the backdoor does not delete and it does not whitewash.; int7 & int11 -> int12: the backdoor is not microcosmic.; int6 & int12 -> int13: the backdoor is non-poetics thing that is a relative.; int5 & int13 -> int14: the backdoor is not hadal.; int4 & int14 -> int15: that the backdoor is both a moppet and centigrade is false.; int15 -> int16: there is something such that the fact that it is a moppet and is centigrade is not right.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the groundsheet is factory-made. ; $context$ = sent1: the groundsheet is factory-made if the fact that the marchioness does gentle is right. sent2: if the friar's-cowl is not a pannier that the muslin is not evening and is not a Meridian is not true. sent3: something is not hadal if it is non-poetics thing that is not non-relative. sent4: that the marchioness rehears Clitocybe and is not factory-made is not correct. sent5: if the muslin is not a executant the backdoor does not delete and is not a whitewashed. sent6: the marchioness is factory-made. sent7: if the marchioness is a moppet then the fact that it does impugn homeliness and gentles does not hold. sent8: that something is a kind of a moppet and it is centigrade is not true if it is not hadal. sent9: something is both non-poetics and not non-relative if the fact that it is not microcosmic is not false. sent10: if something is a kind of a moppet then that it does impugn homeliness and it does gentle is not right. sent11: something is not a executant if the fact that it is a kind of non-evening thing that is not a Meridian does not hold. sent12: the marchioness does rough Tineidae. sent13: the burgess is a moppet and it rehears sierra. sent14: something is not microcosmic if it does not delete and it is not a whitewashed. sent15: the friar's-cowl is not a pannier. sent16: the stave is centigrade. sent17: the marchioness is centigrade. sent18: the fact that the marchioness is a kind of a moppet and it is centigrade is correct. sent19: the marchioness is centigrade and it is factory-made. sent20: if the fact that the marchioness does impugn homeliness and does not gentle is not right the groundsheet is factory-made. sent21: that the cholla is invisible but it does not ripen burgess is false if it is dimorphic. sent22: that the marchioness does impugn homeliness and it does gentle is not right. sent23: if something is a moppet that it does impugn homeliness and does not gentle does not hold. ; $proof$ = | sent23 -> int1: that the marchioness impugns homeliness and does not gentle is not right if it is a moppet.; sent18 -> int2: the marchioness is a kind of a moppet.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the marchioness does impugn homeliness but it does not gentle is not true.; int3 & sent20 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | if something is a moppet that it does impugn homeliness and does not gentle does not hold. | [
"the fact that the marchioness is a kind of a moppet and it is centigrade is correct.",
"if the fact that the marchioness does impugn homeliness and does not gentle is not right the groundsheet is factory-made."
] | [
"It doesn't hold if something is a moppet and it does impugn homeliness.",
"If something is a moppet, it does impugn homeliness and does not hold."
] | If something is a moppet, it does impugn homeliness and does not hold. | if the fact that the marchioness does impugn homeliness and does not gentle is not right the groundsheet is factory-made. |
the Fothergilla is both ovoviviparous and aerological. | sent1: there is something such that the fact that it is not unservile and it does not rough boorishness does not hold. sent2: the Fothergilla is ovoviviparous if there exists something such that that it is a kind of non-unservile thing that does not rough boorishness does not hold. sent3: the countertenor does impugn somatotropin and it does trip. sent4: the Fothergilla is a kind of aerological a Bulnesia. sent5: if the fact that something is not aerological and is not ovoviviparous is false then that it is extraterritorial is correct. | ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) | sent1: (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent2: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {A}{a} sent3: ({ED}{h} & {FE}{h}) sent4: ({B}{a} & {C}{a}) sent5: (x): ¬(¬{B}x & ¬{A}x) -> {BL}x | [
"sent1 & sent2 -> int1: the Fothergilla is ovoviviparous.; sent4 -> int2: the Fothergilla is aerological.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent1 & sent2 -> int1: {A}{a}; sent4 -> int2: {B}{a}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | that the Mormon is extraterritorial and does rehear saveloy is true. | ({BL}{fd} & {GC}{fd}) | 3 | [
"sent5 -> int3: if that the Mormon is non-aerological and non-ovoviviparous is not right it is extraterritorial.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the Fothergilla is both ovoviviparous and aerological. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that the fact that it is not unservile and it does not rough boorishness does not hold. sent2: the Fothergilla is ovoviviparous if there exists something such that that it is a kind of non-unservile thing that does not rough boorishness does not hold. sent3: the countertenor does impugn somatotropin and it does trip. sent4: the Fothergilla is a kind of aerological a Bulnesia. sent5: if the fact that something is not aerological and is not ovoviviparous is false then that it is extraterritorial is correct. ; $proof$ = | sent1 & sent2 -> int1: the Fothergilla is ovoviviparous.; sent4 -> int2: the Fothergilla is aerological.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | there is something such that the fact that it is not unservile and it does not rough boorishness does not hold. | [
"the Fothergilla is ovoviviparous if there exists something such that that it is a kind of non-unservile thing that does not rough boorishness does not hold.",
"the Fothergilla is a kind of aerological a Bulnesia."
] | [
"It doesn't hold because it isn't unservile and it doesn't rough boorishness.",
"It doesn't hold because it isn't unservile and it doesn't have rough boorishness."
] | It doesn't hold because it isn't unservile and it doesn't rough boorishness. | the Fothergilla is ovoviviparous if there exists something such that that it is a kind of non-unservile thing that does not rough boorishness does not hold. |
the Fothergilla is both ovoviviparous and aerological. | sent1: there is something such that the fact that it is not unservile and it does not rough boorishness does not hold. sent2: the Fothergilla is ovoviviparous if there exists something such that that it is a kind of non-unservile thing that does not rough boorishness does not hold. sent3: the countertenor does impugn somatotropin and it does trip. sent4: the Fothergilla is a kind of aerological a Bulnesia. sent5: if the fact that something is not aerological and is not ovoviviparous is false then that it is extraterritorial is correct. | ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) | sent1: (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent2: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {A}{a} sent3: ({ED}{h} & {FE}{h}) sent4: ({B}{a} & {C}{a}) sent5: (x): ¬(¬{B}x & ¬{A}x) -> {BL}x | [
"sent1 & sent2 -> int1: the Fothergilla is ovoviviparous.; sent4 -> int2: the Fothergilla is aerological.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent1 & sent2 -> int1: {A}{a}; sent4 -> int2: {B}{a}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | that the Mormon is extraterritorial and does rehear saveloy is true. | ({BL}{fd} & {GC}{fd}) | 3 | [
"sent5 -> int3: if that the Mormon is non-aerological and non-ovoviviparous is not right it is extraterritorial.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the Fothergilla is both ovoviviparous and aerological. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that the fact that it is not unservile and it does not rough boorishness does not hold. sent2: the Fothergilla is ovoviviparous if there exists something such that that it is a kind of non-unservile thing that does not rough boorishness does not hold. sent3: the countertenor does impugn somatotropin and it does trip. sent4: the Fothergilla is a kind of aerological a Bulnesia. sent5: if the fact that something is not aerological and is not ovoviviparous is false then that it is extraterritorial is correct. ; $proof$ = | sent1 & sent2 -> int1: the Fothergilla is ovoviviparous.; sent4 -> int2: the Fothergilla is aerological.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | there is something such that the fact that it is not unservile and it does not rough boorishness does not hold. | [
"the Fothergilla is ovoviviparous if there exists something such that that it is a kind of non-unservile thing that does not rough boorishness does not hold.",
"the Fothergilla is a kind of aerological a Bulnesia."
] | [
"It doesn't hold because it isn't unservile and it doesn't rough boorishness.",
"It doesn't hold because it isn't unservile and it doesn't have rough boorishness."
] | It doesn't hold because it isn't unservile and it doesn't have rough boorishness. | the Fothergilla is a kind of aerological a Bulnesia. |
something is both acinar and not a tidbit. | sent1: if the alphabetizer is not a ritual it is not a tidbit. sent2: the alphabetizer is not a ritual. sent3: something rehears relentlessness if it is undrinkable. sent4: there is something such that it is acinar. sent5: that something is not a tidbit but it is acinar does not hold if it is a ritual. sent6: the alphabetizer is a Bulgarian but it is not a Hypentelium if it is sentient. sent7: the barge is sentient. sent8: the alphabetizer is acinar if the fact that the barge is sentient hold. sent9: something is ritual if it does rehear relentlessness. | (Ex): ({B}x & ¬{C}x) | sent1: ¬{D}{b} -> ¬{C}{b} sent2: ¬{D}{b} sent3: (x): {F}x -> {E}x sent4: (Ex): {B}x sent5: (x): {D}x -> ¬(¬{C}x & {B}x) sent6: {A}{b} -> ({JK}{b} & ¬{II}{b}) sent7: {A}{a} sent8: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} sent9: (x): {E}x -> {D}x | [
"sent8 & sent7 -> int1: the alphabetizer is acinar.; sent1 & sent2 -> int2: the alphabetizer is not a tidbit.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the alphabetizer is acinar and is not a tidbit.; int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent8 & sent7 -> int1: {B}{b}; sent1 & sent2 -> int2: ¬{C}{b}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ({B}{b} & ¬{C}{b}); int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 3 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 5 | the alphabetizer is a Bulgarian that is not a Hypentelium. | ({JK}{b} & ¬{II}{b}) | 6 | [
"sent5 -> int4: the fact that the alphabetizer is both not a tidbit and acinar is false if it is ritual.; sent9 -> int5: the alphabetizer is a kind of a ritual if it does rehear relentlessness.; sent3 -> int6: if the fact that the alphabetizer is undrinkable is correct it does rehear relentlessness.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = something is both acinar and not a tidbit. ; $context$ = sent1: if the alphabetizer is not a ritual it is not a tidbit. sent2: the alphabetizer is not a ritual. sent3: something rehears relentlessness if it is undrinkable. sent4: there is something such that it is acinar. sent5: that something is not a tidbit but it is acinar does not hold if it is a ritual. sent6: the alphabetizer is a Bulgarian but it is not a Hypentelium if it is sentient. sent7: the barge is sentient. sent8: the alphabetizer is acinar if the fact that the barge is sentient hold. sent9: something is ritual if it does rehear relentlessness. ; $proof$ = | sent8 & sent7 -> int1: the alphabetizer is acinar.; sent1 & sent2 -> int2: the alphabetizer is not a tidbit.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the alphabetizer is acinar and is not a tidbit.; int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the alphabetizer is acinar if the fact that the barge is sentient hold. | [
"the barge is sentient.",
"if the alphabetizer is not a ritual it is not a tidbit.",
"the alphabetizer is not a ritual."
] | [
"If the barge is sentient hold, the alphabetizer is acinar.",
"If the barge is sentient hold, the alphabetizer iscinar.",
"If the barge is sentient hold the alphabetizer is acinar."
] | If the barge is sentient hold, the alphabetizer is acinar. | the barge is sentient. |
something is both acinar and not a tidbit. | sent1: if the alphabetizer is not a ritual it is not a tidbit. sent2: the alphabetizer is not a ritual. sent3: something rehears relentlessness if it is undrinkable. sent4: there is something such that it is acinar. sent5: that something is not a tidbit but it is acinar does not hold if it is a ritual. sent6: the alphabetizer is a Bulgarian but it is not a Hypentelium if it is sentient. sent7: the barge is sentient. sent8: the alphabetizer is acinar if the fact that the barge is sentient hold. sent9: something is ritual if it does rehear relentlessness. | (Ex): ({B}x & ¬{C}x) | sent1: ¬{D}{b} -> ¬{C}{b} sent2: ¬{D}{b} sent3: (x): {F}x -> {E}x sent4: (Ex): {B}x sent5: (x): {D}x -> ¬(¬{C}x & {B}x) sent6: {A}{b} -> ({JK}{b} & ¬{II}{b}) sent7: {A}{a} sent8: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} sent9: (x): {E}x -> {D}x | [
"sent8 & sent7 -> int1: the alphabetizer is acinar.; sent1 & sent2 -> int2: the alphabetizer is not a tidbit.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the alphabetizer is acinar and is not a tidbit.; int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent8 & sent7 -> int1: {B}{b}; sent1 & sent2 -> int2: ¬{C}{b}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ({B}{b} & ¬{C}{b}); int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 3 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 5 | the alphabetizer is a Bulgarian that is not a Hypentelium. | ({JK}{b} & ¬{II}{b}) | 6 | [
"sent5 -> int4: the fact that the alphabetizer is both not a tidbit and acinar is false if it is ritual.; sent9 -> int5: the alphabetizer is a kind of a ritual if it does rehear relentlessness.; sent3 -> int6: if the fact that the alphabetizer is undrinkable is correct it does rehear relentlessness.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = something is both acinar and not a tidbit. ; $context$ = sent1: if the alphabetizer is not a ritual it is not a tidbit. sent2: the alphabetizer is not a ritual. sent3: something rehears relentlessness if it is undrinkable. sent4: there is something such that it is acinar. sent5: that something is not a tidbit but it is acinar does not hold if it is a ritual. sent6: the alphabetizer is a Bulgarian but it is not a Hypentelium if it is sentient. sent7: the barge is sentient. sent8: the alphabetizer is acinar if the fact that the barge is sentient hold. sent9: something is ritual if it does rehear relentlessness. ; $proof$ = | sent8 & sent7 -> int1: the alphabetizer is acinar.; sent1 & sent2 -> int2: the alphabetizer is not a tidbit.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the alphabetizer is acinar and is not a tidbit.; int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the alphabetizer is acinar if the fact that the barge is sentient hold. | [
"the barge is sentient.",
"if the alphabetizer is not a ritual it is not a tidbit.",
"the alphabetizer is not a ritual."
] | [
"If the barge is sentient hold, the alphabetizer is acinar.",
"If the barge is sentient hold, the alphabetizer iscinar.",
"If the barge is sentient hold the alphabetizer is acinar."
] | If the barge is sentient hold, the alphabetizer iscinar. | if the alphabetizer is not a ritual it is not a tidbit. |
something is both acinar and not a tidbit. | sent1: if the alphabetizer is not a ritual it is not a tidbit. sent2: the alphabetizer is not a ritual. sent3: something rehears relentlessness if it is undrinkable. sent4: there is something such that it is acinar. sent5: that something is not a tidbit but it is acinar does not hold if it is a ritual. sent6: the alphabetizer is a Bulgarian but it is not a Hypentelium if it is sentient. sent7: the barge is sentient. sent8: the alphabetizer is acinar if the fact that the barge is sentient hold. sent9: something is ritual if it does rehear relentlessness. | (Ex): ({B}x & ¬{C}x) | sent1: ¬{D}{b} -> ¬{C}{b} sent2: ¬{D}{b} sent3: (x): {F}x -> {E}x sent4: (Ex): {B}x sent5: (x): {D}x -> ¬(¬{C}x & {B}x) sent6: {A}{b} -> ({JK}{b} & ¬{II}{b}) sent7: {A}{a} sent8: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} sent9: (x): {E}x -> {D}x | [
"sent8 & sent7 -> int1: the alphabetizer is acinar.; sent1 & sent2 -> int2: the alphabetizer is not a tidbit.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the alphabetizer is acinar and is not a tidbit.; int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent8 & sent7 -> int1: {B}{b}; sent1 & sent2 -> int2: ¬{C}{b}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ({B}{b} & ¬{C}{b}); int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 3 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 5 | the alphabetizer is a Bulgarian that is not a Hypentelium. | ({JK}{b} & ¬{II}{b}) | 6 | [
"sent5 -> int4: the fact that the alphabetizer is both not a tidbit and acinar is false if it is ritual.; sent9 -> int5: the alphabetizer is a kind of a ritual if it does rehear relentlessness.; sent3 -> int6: if the fact that the alphabetizer is undrinkable is correct it does rehear relentlessness.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = something is both acinar and not a tidbit. ; $context$ = sent1: if the alphabetizer is not a ritual it is not a tidbit. sent2: the alphabetizer is not a ritual. sent3: something rehears relentlessness if it is undrinkable. sent4: there is something such that it is acinar. sent5: that something is not a tidbit but it is acinar does not hold if it is a ritual. sent6: the alphabetizer is a Bulgarian but it is not a Hypentelium if it is sentient. sent7: the barge is sentient. sent8: the alphabetizer is acinar if the fact that the barge is sentient hold. sent9: something is ritual if it does rehear relentlessness. ; $proof$ = | sent8 & sent7 -> int1: the alphabetizer is acinar.; sent1 & sent2 -> int2: the alphabetizer is not a tidbit.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the alphabetizer is acinar and is not a tidbit.; int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the alphabetizer is acinar if the fact that the barge is sentient hold. | [
"the barge is sentient.",
"if the alphabetizer is not a ritual it is not a tidbit.",
"the alphabetizer is not a ritual."
] | [
"If the barge is sentient hold, the alphabetizer is acinar.",
"If the barge is sentient hold, the alphabetizer iscinar.",
"If the barge is sentient hold the alphabetizer is acinar."
] | If the barge is sentient hold the alphabetizer is acinar. | the alphabetizer is not a ritual. |
that the hollygrape does not rehear rejuvenation is right. | sent1: if something does rehear Photostat it is not apetalous. sent2: if a apetalous thing does rehear Photostat then it rehears rejuvenation. sent3: if the propagator is not longing it is not a headgear. sent4: that the antacid impugns lapel hold. sent5: if the propagator is not a headgear then the sealskin is a kind of a headgear. sent6: the hollygrape rehears rejuvenation if it is apetalous and does rehear Photostat. sent7: if the fact that something impugns hollygrape or is a Liao or both is not correct then it does not impugn legibility. sent8: something is a borosilicate and rehears Photostat if it is not expressible. sent9: if the antacid rehears Photostat it is apetalous. sent10: the sealskin is a matriculate if there is something such that the fact that it is not a matriculate and does impugn cicada is not right. sent11: the hollygrape is a kind of non-apetalous thing that does rehear Photostat if the antacid is non-apetalous. sent12: if the fact that the antacid is apetalous thing that impugns lapel does not hold then the hollygrape does not rehear rejuvenation. sent13: the antacid is ducal. sent14: the rejuvenation impugns lapel. sent15: the propagator is not longing if that it is cytophotometric and it is longing is false. sent16: something rehears rejuvenation if it is non-apetalous thing that rehears Photostat. sent17: if something does not impugn legibility then that it does not matriculate and it impugns cicada is not true. sent18: if something is a matriculate and is a headgear then it is not expressible. sent19: the hollygrape is not apetalous if the antacid is apetalous. sent20: that the propagator is cytophotometric and is longing does not hold. sent21: the antacid is apetalous if it impugns lapel. sent22: the hollygrape is a kind of a Palermo. sent23: that the cattle impugns hollygrape and/or it is a Liao is incorrect. sent24: That the lapel impugns antacid hold. sent25: the hollygrape is not apetalous. | ¬{C}{b} | sent1: (x): {D}x -> ¬{B}x sent2: (x): ({B}x & {D}x) -> {C}x sent3: ¬{K}{e} -> ¬{H}{e} sent4: {A}{a} sent5: ¬{H}{e} -> {H}{c} sent6: ({B}{b} & {D}{b}) -> {C}{b} sent7: (x): ¬({M}x v {L}x) -> ¬{I}x sent8: (x): ¬{F}x -> ({E}x & {D}x) sent9: {D}{a} -> {B}{a} sent10: (x): ¬(¬{G}x & {J}x) -> {G}{c} sent11: {B}{a} -> (¬{B}{b} & {D}{b}) sent12: ¬({B}{a} & {A}{a}) -> ¬{C}{b} sent13: {FN}{a} sent14: {A}{ia} sent15: ¬({O}{e} & {K}{e}) -> ¬{K}{e} sent16: (x): (¬{B}x & {D}x) -> {C}x sent17: (x): ¬{I}x -> ¬(¬{G}x & {J}x) sent18: (x): ({G}x & {H}x) -> ¬{F}x sent19: {B}{a} -> ¬{B}{b} sent20: ¬({O}{e} & {K}{e}) sent21: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} sent22: {IQ}{b} sent23: ¬({M}{d} v {L}{d}) sent24: {AA}{aa} sent25: ¬{B}{b} | [
"sent21 & sent4 -> int1: the antacid is apetalous.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the hollygrape is not apetalous and does rehear Photostat.; sent16 -> int3: that the hollygrape does rehear rejuvenation is not incorrect if it is not apetalous and it rehears Photostat.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent21 & sent4 -> int1: {B}{a}; int1 & sent11 -> int2: (¬{B}{b} & {D}{b}); sent16 -> int3: (¬{B}{b} & {D}{b}) -> {C}{b}; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 3 | 3 | 21 | 0 | 21 | the hollygrape does not rehear rejuvenation. | ¬{C}{b} | 13 | [
"sent1 -> int4: the sealskin is not apetalous if it does rehear Photostat.; sent8 -> int5: the sealskin is a borosilicate that rehears Photostat if it is not expressible.; sent18 -> int6: if the sealskin is both a matriculate and a headgear then it is not expressible.; sent17 -> int7: that the cattle is not a kind of a matriculate and does impugn cicada is not right if it does not impugn legibility.; sent7 -> int8: the cattle does not impugn legibility if the fact that it impugns hollygrape and/or is a Liao does not hold.; int8 & sent23 -> int9: the cattle does not impugn legibility.; int7 & int9 -> int10: that that the cattle does not matriculate but it does impugn cicada is not false does not hold.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that that it does not matriculate and impugns cicada is wrong.; int11 & sent10 -> int12: the sealskin is a kind of a matriculate.; sent15 & sent20 -> int13: the propagator is not longing.; sent3 & int13 -> int14: the propagator is not a headgear.; sent5 & int14 -> int15: the sealskin is a headgear.; int12 & int15 -> int16: the sealskin does matriculate and it is a kind of a headgear.; int6 & int16 -> int17: the sealskin is not expressible.; int5 & int17 -> int18: the sealskin is a borosilicate and it does rehear Photostat.; int18 -> int19: the sealskin rehears Photostat.; int4 & int19 -> int20: the sealskin is not apetalous.; int20 -> int21: there is something such that it is not apetalous.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that the hollygrape does not rehear rejuvenation is right. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does rehear Photostat it is not apetalous. sent2: if a apetalous thing does rehear Photostat then it rehears rejuvenation. sent3: if the propagator is not longing it is not a headgear. sent4: that the antacid impugns lapel hold. sent5: if the propagator is not a headgear then the sealskin is a kind of a headgear. sent6: the hollygrape rehears rejuvenation if it is apetalous and does rehear Photostat. sent7: if the fact that something impugns hollygrape or is a Liao or both is not correct then it does not impugn legibility. sent8: something is a borosilicate and rehears Photostat if it is not expressible. sent9: if the antacid rehears Photostat it is apetalous. sent10: the sealskin is a matriculate if there is something such that the fact that it is not a matriculate and does impugn cicada is not right. sent11: the hollygrape is a kind of non-apetalous thing that does rehear Photostat if the antacid is non-apetalous. sent12: if the fact that the antacid is apetalous thing that impugns lapel does not hold then the hollygrape does not rehear rejuvenation. sent13: the antacid is ducal. sent14: the rejuvenation impugns lapel. sent15: the propagator is not longing if that it is cytophotometric and it is longing is false. sent16: something rehears rejuvenation if it is non-apetalous thing that rehears Photostat. sent17: if something does not impugn legibility then that it does not matriculate and it impugns cicada is not true. sent18: if something is a matriculate and is a headgear then it is not expressible. sent19: the hollygrape is not apetalous if the antacid is apetalous. sent20: that the propagator is cytophotometric and is longing does not hold. sent21: the antacid is apetalous if it impugns lapel. sent22: the hollygrape is a kind of a Palermo. sent23: that the cattle impugns hollygrape and/or it is a Liao is incorrect. sent24: That the lapel impugns antacid hold. sent25: the hollygrape is not apetalous. ; $proof$ = | sent21 & sent4 -> int1: the antacid is apetalous.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the hollygrape is not apetalous and does rehear Photostat.; sent16 -> int3: that the hollygrape does rehear rejuvenation is not incorrect if it is not apetalous and it rehears Photostat.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the antacid is apetalous if it impugns lapel. | [
"that the antacid impugns lapel hold.",
"the hollygrape is a kind of non-apetalous thing that does rehear Photostat if the antacid is non-apetalous.",
"something rehears rejuvenation if it is non-apetalous thing that rehears Photostat."
] | [
"If it impugns lapel, the antacid is apetalous.",
"If it impugns the lapel, the antacid is apetalous.",
"If it impugns lapel the antacid is apetalous."
] | If it impugns lapel, the antacid is apetalous. | that the antacid impugns lapel hold. |
that the hollygrape does not rehear rejuvenation is right. | sent1: if something does rehear Photostat it is not apetalous. sent2: if a apetalous thing does rehear Photostat then it rehears rejuvenation. sent3: if the propagator is not longing it is not a headgear. sent4: that the antacid impugns lapel hold. sent5: if the propagator is not a headgear then the sealskin is a kind of a headgear. sent6: the hollygrape rehears rejuvenation if it is apetalous and does rehear Photostat. sent7: if the fact that something impugns hollygrape or is a Liao or both is not correct then it does not impugn legibility. sent8: something is a borosilicate and rehears Photostat if it is not expressible. sent9: if the antacid rehears Photostat it is apetalous. sent10: the sealskin is a matriculate if there is something such that the fact that it is not a matriculate and does impugn cicada is not right. sent11: the hollygrape is a kind of non-apetalous thing that does rehear Photostat if the antacid is non-apetalous. sent12: if the fact that the antacid is apetalous thing that impugns lapel does not hold then the hollygrape does not rehear rejuvenation. sent13: the antacid is ducal. sent14: the rejuvenation impugns lapel. sent15: the propagator is not longing if that it is cytophotometric and it is longing is false. sent16: something rehears rejuvenation if it is non-apetalous thing that rehears Photostat. sent17: if something does not impugn legibility then that it does not matriculate and it impugns cicada is not true. sent18: if something is a matriculate and is a headgear then it is not expressible. sent19: the hollygrape is not apetalous if the antacid is apetalous. sent20: that the propagator is cytophotometric and is longing does not hold. sent21: the antacid is apetalous if it impugns lapel. sent22: the hollygrape is a kind of a Palermo. sent23: that the cattle impugns hollygrape and/or it is a Liao is incorrect. sent24: That the lapel impugns antacid hold. sent25: the hollygrape is not apetalous. | ¬{C}{b} | sent1: (x): {D}x -> ¬{B}x sent2: (x): ({B}x & {D}x) -> {C}x sent3: ¬{K}{e} -> ¬{H}{e} sent4: {A}{a} sent5: ¬{H}{e} -> {H}{c} sent6: ({B}{b} & {D}{b}) -> {C}{b} sent7: (x): ¬({M}x v {L}x) -> ¬{I}x sent8: (x): ¬{F}x -> ({E}x & {D}x) sent9: {D}{a} -> {B}{a} sent10: (x): ¬(¬{G}x & {J}x) -> {G}{c} sent11: {B}{a} -> (¬{B}{b} & {D}{b}) sent12: ¬({B}{a} & {A}{a}) -> ¬{C}{b} sent13: {FN}{a} sent14: {A}{ia} sent15: ¬({O}{e} & {K}{e}) -> ¬{K}{e} sent16: (x): (¬{B}x & {D}x) -> {C}x sent17: (x): ¬{I}x -> ¬(¬{G}x & {J}x) sent18: (x): ({G}x & {H}x) -> ¬{F}x sent19: {B}{a} -> ¬{B}{b} sent20: ¬({O}{e} & {K}{e}) sent21: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} sent22: {IQ}{b} sent23: ¬({M}{d} v {L}{d}) sent24: {AA}{aa} sent25: ¬{B}{b} | [
"sent21 & sent4 -> int1: the antacid is apetalous.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the hollygrape is not apetalous and does rehear Photostat.; sent16 -> int3: that the hollygrape does rehear rejuvenation is not incorrect if it is not apetalous and it rehears Photostat.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent21 & sent4 -> int1: {B}{a}; int1 & sent11 -> int2: (¬{B}{b} & {D}{b}); sent16 -> int3: (¬{B}{b} & {D}{b}) -> {C}{b}; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 3 | 3 | 21 | 0 | 21 | the hollygrape does not rehear rejuvenation. | ¬{C}{b} | 13 | [
"sent1 -> int4: the sealskin is not apetalous if it does rehear Photostat.; sent8 -> int5: the sealskin is a borosilicate that rehears Photostat if it is not expressible.; sent18 -> int6: if the sealskin is both a matriculate and a headgear then it is not expressible.; sent17 -> int7: that the cattle is not a kind of a matriculate and does impugn cicada is not right if it does not impugn legibility.; sent7 -> int8: the cattle does not impugn legibility if the fact that it impugns hollygrape and/or is a Liao does not hold.; int8 & sent23 -> int9: the cattle does not impugn legibility.; int7 & int9 -> int10: that that the cattle does not matriculate but it does impugn cicada is not false does not hold.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that that it does not matriculate and impugns cicada is wrong.; int11 & sent10 -> int12: the sealskin is a kind of a matriculate.; sent15 & sent20 -> int13: the propagator is not longing.; sent3 & int13 -> int14: the propagator is not a headgear.; sent5 & int14 -> int15: the sealskin is a headgear.; int12 & int15 -> int16: the sealskin does matriculate and it is a kind of a headgear.; int6 & int16 -> int17: the sealskin is not expressible.; int5 & int17 -> int18: the sealskin is a borosilicate and it does rehear Photostat.; int18 -> int19: the sealskin rehears Photostat.; int4 & int19 -> int20: the sealskin is not apetalous.; int20 -> int21: there is something such that it is not apetalous.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that the hollygrape does not rehear rejuvenation is right. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does rehear Photostat it is not apetalous. sent2: if a apetalous thing does rehear Photostat then it rehears rejuvenation. sent3: if the propagator is not longing it is not a headgear. sent4: that the antacid impugns lapel hold. sent5: if the propagator is not a headgear then the sealskin is a kind of a headgear. sent6: the hollygrape rehears rejuvenation if it is apetalous and does rehear Photostat. sent7: if the fact that something impugns hollygrape or is a Liao or both is not correct then it does not impugn legibility. sent8: something is a borosilicate and rehears Photostat if it is not expressible. sent9: if the antacid rehears Photostat it is apetalous. sent10: the sealskin is a matriculate if there is something such that the fact that it is not a matriculate and does impugn cicada is not right. sent11: the hollygrape is a kind of non-apetalous thing that does rehear Photostat if the antacid is non-apetalous. sent12: if the fact that the antacid is apetalous thing that impugns lapel does not hold then the hollygrape does not rehear rejuvenation. sent13: the antacid is ducal. sent14: the rejuvenation impugns lapel. sent15: the propagator is not longing if that it is cytophotometric and it is longing is false. sent16: something rehears rejuvenation if it is non-apetalous thing that rehears Photostat. sent17: if something does not impugn legibility then that it does not matriculate and it impugns cicada is not true. sent18: if something is a matriculate and is a headgear then it is not expressible. sent19: the hollygrape is not apetalous if the antacid is apetalous. sent20: that the propagator is cytophotometric and is longing does not hold. sent21: the antacid is apetalous if it impugns lapel. sent22: the hollygrape is a kind of a Palermo. sent23: that the cattle impugns hollygrape and/or it is a Liao is incorrect. sent24: That the lapel impugns antacid hold. sent25: the hollygrape is not apetalous. ; $proof$ = | sent21 & sent4 -> int1: the antacid is apetalous.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the hollygrape is not apetalous and does rehear Photostat.; sent16 -> int3: that the hollygrape does rehear rejuvenation is not incorrect if it is not apetalous and it rehears Photostat.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the antacid is apetalous if it impugns lapel. | [
"that the antacid impugns lapel hold.",
"the hollygrape is a kind of non-apetalous thing that does rehear Photostat if the antacid is non-apetalous.",
"something rehears rejuvenation if it is non-apetalous thing that rehears Photostat."
] | [
"If it impugns lapel, the antacid is apetalous.",
"If it impugns the lapel, the antacid is apetalous.",
"If it impugns lapel the antacid is apetalous."
] | If it impugns the lapel, the antacid is apetalous. | the hollygrape is a kind of non-apetalous thing that does rehear Photostat if the antacid is non-apetalous. |
that the hollygrape does not rehear rejuvenation is right. | sent1: if something does rehear Photostat it is not apetalous. sent2: if a apetalous thing does rehear Photostat then it rehears rejuvenation. sent3: if the propagator is not longing it is not a headgear. sent4: that the antacid impugns lapel hold. sent5: if the propagator is not a headgear then the sealskin is a kind of a headgear. sent6: the hollygrape rehears rejuvenation if it is apetalous and does rehear Photostat. sent7: if the fact that something impugns hollygrape or is a Liao or both is not correct then it does not impugn legibility. sent8: something is a borosilicate and rehears Photostat if it is not expressible. sent9: if the antacid rehears Photostat it is apetalous. sent10: the sealskin is a matriculate if there is something such that the fact that it is not a matriculate and does impugn cicada is not right. sent11: the hollygrape is a kind of non-apetalous thing that does rehear Photostat if the antacid is non-apetalous. sent12: if the fact that the antacid is apetalous thing that impugns lapel does not hold then the hollygrape does not rehear rejuvenation. sent13: the antacid is ducal. sent14: the rejuvenation impugns lapel. sent15: the propagator is not longing if that it is cytophotometric and it is longing is false. sent16: something rehears rejuvenation if it is non-apetalous thing that rehears Photostat. sent17: if something does not impugn legibility then that it does not matriculate and it impugns cicada is not true. sent18: if something is a matriculate and is a headgear then it is not expressible. sent19: the hollygrape is not apetalous if the antacid is apetalous. sent20: that the propagator is cytophotometric and is longing does not hold. sent21: the antacid is apetalous if it impugns lapel. sent22: the hollygrape is a kind of a Palermo. sent23: that the cattle impugns hollygrape and/or it is a Liao is incorrect. sent24: That the lapel impugns antacid hold. sent25: the hollygrape is not apetalous. | ¬{C}{b} | sent1: (x): {D}x -> ¬{B}x sent2: (x): ({B}x & {D}x) -> {C}x sent3: ¬{K}{e} -> ¬{H}{e} sent4: {A}{a} sent5: ¬{H}{e} -> {H}{c} sent6: ({B}{b} & {D}{b}) -> {C}{b} sent7: (x): ¬({M}x v {L}x) -> ¬{I}x sent8: (x): ¬{F}x -> ({E}x & {D}x) sent9: {D}{a} -> {B}{a} sent10: (x): ¬(¬{G}x & {J}x) -> {G}{c} sent11: {B}{a} -> (¬{B}{b} & {D}{b}) sent12: ¬({B}{a} & {A}{a}) -> ¬{C}{b} sent13: {FN}{a} sent14: {A}{ia} sent15: ¬({O}{e} & {K}{e}) -> ¬{K}{e} sent16: (x): (¬{B}x & {D}x) -> {C}x sent17: (x): ¬{I}x -> ¬(¬{G}x & {J}x) sent18: (x): ({G}x & {H}x) -> ¬{F}x sent19: {B}{a} -> ¬{B}{b} sent20: ¬({O}{e} & {K}{e}) sent21: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} sent22: {IQ}{b} sent23: ¬({M}{d} v {L}{d}) sent24: {AA}{aa} sent25: ¬{B}{b} | [
"sent21 & sent4 -> int1: the antacid is apetalous.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the hollygrape is not apetalous and does rehear Photostat.; sent16 -> int3: that the hollygrape does rehear rejuvenation is not incorrect if it is not apetalous and it rehears Photostat.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent21 & sent4 -> int1: {B}{a}; int1 & sent11 -> int2: (¬{B}{b} & {D}{b}); sent16 -> int3: (¬{B}{b} & {D}{b}) -> {C}{b}; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 3 | 3 | 21 | 0 | 21 | the hollygrape does not rehear rejuvenation. | ¬{C}{b} | 13 | [
"sent1 -> int4: the sealskin is not apetalous if it does rehear Photostat.; sent8 -> int5: the sealskin is a borosilicate that rehears Photostat if it is not expressible.; sent18 -> int6: if the sealskin is both a matriculate and a headgear then it is not expressible.; sent17 -> int7: that the cattle is not a kind of a matriculate and does impugn cicada is not right if it does not impugn legibility.; sent7 -> int8: the cattle does not impugn legibility if the fact that it impugns hollygrape and/or is a Liao does not hold.; int8 & sent23 -> int9: the cattle does not impugn legibility.; int7 & int9 -> int10: that that the cattle does not matriculate but it does impugn cicada is not false does not hold.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that that it does not matriculate and impugns cicada is wrong.; int11 & sent10 -> int12: the sealskin is a kind of a matriculate.; sent15 & sent20 -> int13: the propagator is not longing.; sent3 & int13 -> int14: the propagator is not a headgear.; sent5 & int14 -> int15: the sealskin is a headgear.; int12 & int15 -> int16: the sealskin does matriculate and it is a kind of a headgear.; int6 & int16 -> int17: the sealskin is not expressible.; int5 & int17 -> int18: the sealskin is a borosilicate and it does rehear Photostat.; int18 -> int19: the sealskin rehears Photostat.; int4 & int19 -> int20: the sealskin is not apetalous.; int20 -> int21: there is something such that it is not apetalous.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that the hollygrape does not rehear rejuvenation is right. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does rehear Photostat it is not apetalous. sent2: if a apetalous thing does rehear Photostat then it rehears rejuvenation. sent3: if the propagator is not longing it is not a headgear. sent4: that the antacid impugns lapel hold. sent5: if the propagator is not a headgear then the sealskin is a kind of a headgear. sent6: the hollygrape rehears rejuvenation if it is apetalous and does rehear Photostat. sent7: if the fact that something impugns hollygrape or is a Liao or both is not correct then it does not impugn legibility. sent8: something is a borosilicate and rehears Photostat if it is not expressible. sent9: if the antacid rehears Photostat it is apetalous. sent10: the sealskin is a matriculate if there is something such that the fact that it is not a matriculate and does impugn cicada is not right. sent11: the hollygrape is a kind of non-apetalous thing that does rehear Photostat if the antacid is non-apetalous. sent12: if the fact that the antacid is apetalous thing that impugns lapel does not hold then the hollygrape does not rehear rejuvenation. sent13: the antacid is ducal. sent14: the rejuvenation impugns lapel. sent15: the propagator is not longing if that it is cytophotometric and it is longing is false. sent16: something rehears rejuvenation if it is non-apetalous thing that rehears Photostat. sent17: if something does not impugn legibility then that it does not matriculate and it impugns cicada is not true. sent18: if something is a matriculate and is a headgear then it is not expressible. sent19: the hollygrape is not apetalous if the antacid is apetalous. sent20: that the propagator is cytophotometric and is longing does not hold. sent21: the antacid is apetalous if it impugns lapel. sent22: the hollygrape is a kind of a Palermo. sent23: that the cattle impugns hollygrape and/or it is a Liao is incorrect. sent24: That the lapel impugns antacid hold. sent25: the hollygrape is not apetalous. ; $proof$ = | sent21 & sent4 -> int1: the antacid is apetalous.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the hollygrape is not apetalous and does rehear Photostat.; sent16 -> int3: that the hollygrape does rehear rejuvenation is not incorrect if it is not apetalous and it rehears Photostat.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the antacid is apetalous if it impugns lapel. | [
"that the antacid impugns lapel hold.",
"the hollygrape is a kind of non-apetalous thing that does rehear Photostat if the antacid is non-apetalous.",
"something rehears rejuvenation if it is non-apetalous thing that rehears Photostat."
] | [
"If it impugns lapel, the antacid is apetalous.",
"If it impugns the lapel, the antacid is apetalous.",
"If it impugns lapel the antacid is apetalous."
] | If it impugns lapel the antacid is apetalous. | something rehears rejuvenation if it is non-apetalous thing that rehears Photostat. |
the succinylcholine is not a subduer. | sent1: if that something is not a Gehrig but it is Kiplingesque is right then it is not a subduer. sent2: there exists something such that it is not a subduer. sent3: there is something such that the fact that it is not antisatellite is not wrong. sent4: if something impugns succinylcholine then that it is a kind of non-intradepartmental a Gehrig is not right. sent5: the benzodiazepine ripens legend. sent6: there is something such that that it is moonlit does not hold. sent7: there exists something such that it is not Kiplingesque. sent8: that the fact that something is not a skullcap or it is Kiplingesque or both is not correct if it is not an escalation is not incorrect. sent9: there is something such that that it is moonlit and/or it is antisatellite is not true. sent10: the succinylcholine is not moonlit. sent11: the cascarilla impugns succinylcholine. sent12: something is moonlit and/or it is antisatellite. sent13: if that that the cascarilla is not intradepartmental but it is a Gehrig hold is false then the succinylcholine is not a Gehrig. sent14: if the benzodiazepine is not a skullcap then the fact that the cascarilla does not impugn succinylcholine but it is a kind of a Gehrig is not correct. sent15: the benzodiazepine is both heterologous and not a drafting. sent16: if the fact that the catostomid is not a skullcap and/or is Kiplingesque is not right then the succinylcholine is Kiplingesque. sent17: if there is something such that that either it is moonlit or it is antisatellite or both is not true then the catostomid is not Kiplingesque. sent18: something is a Apollinaire if it is not non-heterologous and it does not draft. sent19: that the catostomid is a Gehrig if that the cascarilla does not impugn succinylcholine and is a kind of a Gehrig does not hold hold. sent20: if the catostomid is not Kiplingesque then the succinylcholine is a kind of a subduer. | ¬{B}{b} | sent1: (x): (¬{C}x & {A}x) -> ¬{B}x sent2: (Ex): ¬{B}x sent3: (Ex): ¬{AB}x sent4: (x): {E}x -> ¬(¬{F}x & {C}x) sent5: {I}{d} sent6: (Ex): ¬{AA}x sent7: (Ex): ¬{A}x sent8: (x): ¬{G}x -> ¬(¬{D}x v {A}x) sent9: (Ex): ¬({AA}x v {AB}x) sent10: ¬{AA}{b} sent11: {E}{c} sent12: (Ex): ({AA}x v {AB}x) sent13: ¬(¬{F}{c} & {C}{c}) -> ¬{C}{b} sent14: ¬{D}{d} -> ¬(¬{E}{c} & {C}{c}) sent15: ({J}{d} & ¬{K}{d}) sent16: ¬(¬{D}{a} v {A}{a}) -> {A}{b} sent17: (x): ¬({AA}x v {AB}x) -> ¬{A}{a} sent18: (x): ({J}x & ¬{K}x) -> {H}x sent19: ¬(¬{E}{c} & {C}{c}) -> {C}{a} sent20: ¬{A}{a} -> {B}{b} | [
"sent9 & sent17 -> int1: the catostomid is not Kiplingesque.; sent20 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent9 & sent17 -> int1: ¬{A}{a}; sent20 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 2 | 2 | 17 | 0 | 17 | the succinylcholine is not a kind of a subduer. | ¬{B}{b} | 9 | [
"sent1 -> int2: if the succinylcholine is not a Gehrig but it is Kiplingesque then it is not a kind of a subduer.; sent4 -> int3: the fact that the cascarilla is not intradepartmental and is a Gehrig does not hold if it impugns succinylcholine.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the fact that the cascarilla is non-intradepartmental a Gehrig does not hold.; sent13 & int4 -> int5: the succinylcholine is not a Gehrig.; sent8 -> int6: that either the catostomid is not a kind of a skullcap or it is not non-Kiplingesque or both is not right if it is not a kind of an escalation.; sent18 -> int7: the benzodiazepine is a Apollinaire if it is heterologous and not a drafting.; int7 & sent15 -> int8: the benzodiazepine is a kind of a Apollinaire.; int8 & sent5 -> int9: the benzodiazepine is a kind of a Apollinaire and ripens legend.; int9 -> int10: something is a Apollinaire and it does ripen legend.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the succinylcholine is not a subduer. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something is not a Gehrig but it is Kiplingesque is right then it is not a subduer. sent2: there exists something such that it is not a subduer. sent3: there is something such that the fact that it is not antisatellite is not wrong. sent4: if something impugns succinylcholine then that it is a kind of non-intradepartmental a Gehrig is not right. sent5: the benzodiazepine ripens legend. sent6: there is something such that that it is moonlit does not hold. sent7: there exists something such that it is not Kiplingesque. sent8: that the fact that something is not a skullcap or it is Kiplingesque or both is not correct if it is not an escalation is not incorrect. sent9: there is something such that that it is moonlit and/or it is antisatellite is not true. sent10: the succinylcholine is not moonlit. sent11: the cascarilla impugns succinylcholine. sent12: something is moonlit and/or it is antisatellite. sent13: if that that the cascarilla is not intradepartmental but it is a Gehrig hold is false then the succinylcholine is not a Gehrig. sent14: if the benzodiazepine is not a skullcap then the fact that the cascarilla does not impugn succinylcholine but it is a kind of a Gehrig is not correct. sent15: the benzodiazepine is both heterologous and not a drafting. sent16: if the fact that the catostomid is not a skullcap and/or is Kiplingesque is not right then the succinylcholine is Kiplingesque. sent17: if there is something such that that either it is moonlit or it is antisatellite or both is not true then the catostomid is not Kiplingesque. sent18: something is a Apollinaire if it is not non-heterologous and it does not draft. sent19: that the catostomid is a Gehrig if that the cascarilla does not impugn succinylcholine and is a kind of a Gehrig does not hold hold. sent20: if the catostomid is not Kiplingesque then the succinylcholine is a kind of a subduer. ; $proof$ = | sent9 & sent17 -> int1: the catostomid is not Kiplingesque.; sent20 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | there is something such that that it is moonlit and/or it is antisatellite is not true. | [
"if there is something such that that either it is moonlit or it is antisatellite or both is not true then the catostomid is not Kiplingesque.",
"if the catostomid is not Kiplingesque then the succinylcholine is a kind of a subduer."
] | [
"It is not true that it is moonlit.",
"It is not true that it is moonlit or antisatellite."
] | It is not true that it is moonlit. | if there is something such that that either it is moonlit or it is antisatellite or both is not true then the catostomid is not Kiplingesque. |
the succinylcholine is not a subduer. | sent1: if that something is not a Gehrig but it is Kiplingesque is right then it is not a subduer. sent2: there exists something such that it is not a subduer. sent3: there is something such that the fact that it is not antisatellite is not wrong. sent4: if something impugns succinylcholine then that it is a kind of non-intradepartmental a Gehrig is not right. sent5: the benzodiazepine ripens legend. sent6: there is something such that that it is moonlit does not hold. sent7: there exists something such that it is not Kiplingesque. sent8: that the fact that something is not a skullcap or it is Kiplingesque or both is not correct if it is not an escalation is not incorrect. sent9: there is something such that that it is moonlit and/or it is antisatellite is not true. sent10: the succinylcholine is not moonlit. sent11: the cascarilla impugns succinylcholine. sent12: something is moonlit and/or it is antisatellite. sent13: if that that the cascarilla is not intradepartmental but it is a Gehrig hold is false then the succinylcholine is not a Gehrig. sent14: if the benzodiazepine is not a skullcap then the fact that the cascarilla does not impugn succinylcholine but it is a kind of a Gehrig is not correct. sent15: the benzodiazepine is both heterologous and not a drafting. sent16: if the fact that the catostomid is not a skullcap and/or is Kiplingesque is not right then the succinylcholine is Kiplingesque. sent17: if there is something such that that either it is moonlit or it is antisatellite or both is not true then the catostomid is not Kiplingesque. sent18: something is a Apollinaire if it is not non-heterologous and it does not draft. sent19: that the catostomid is a Gehrig if that the cascarilla does not impugn succinylcholine and is a kind of a Gehrig does not hold hold. sent20: if the catostomid is not Kiplingesque then the succinylcholine is a kind of a subduer. | ¬{B}{b} | sent1: (x): (¬{C}x & {A}x) -> ¬{B}x sent2: (Ex): ¬{B}x sent3: (Ex): ¬{AB}x sent4: (x): {E}x -> ¬(¬{F}x & {C}x) sent5: {I}{d} sent6: (Ex): ¬{AA}x sent7: (Ex): ¬{A}x sent8: (x): ¬{G}x -> ¬(¬{D}x v {A}x) sent9: (Ex): ¬({AA}x v {AB}x) sent10: ¬{AA}{b} sent11: {E}{c} sent12: (Ex): ({AA}x v {AB}x) sent13: ¬(¬{F}{c} & {C}{c}) -> ¬{C}{b} sent14: ¬{D}{d} -> ¬(¬{E}{c} & {C}{c}) sent15: ({J}{d} & ¬{K}{d}) sent16: ¬(¬{D}{a} v {A}{a}) -> {A}{b} sent17: (x): ¬({AA}x v {AB}x) -> ¬{A}{a} sent18: (x): ({J}x & ¬{K}x) -> {H}x sent19: ¬(¬{E}{c} & {C}{c}) -> {C}{a} sent20: ¬{A}{a} -> {B}{b} | [
"sent9 & sent17 -> int1: the catostomid is not Kiplingesque.; sent20 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent9 & sent17 -> int1: ¬{A}{a}; sent20 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 2 | 2 | 17 | 0 | 17 | the succinylcholine is not a kind of a subduer. | ¬{B}{b} | 9 | [
"sent1 -> int2: if the succinylcholine is not a Gehrig but it is Kiplingesque then it is not a kind of a subduer.; sent4 -> int3: the fact that the cascarilla is not intradepartmental and is a Gehrig does not hold if it impugns succinylcholine.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the fact that the cascarilla is non-intradepartmental a Gehrig does not hold.; sent13 & int4 -> int5: the succinylcholine is not a Gehrig.; sent8 -> int6: that either the catostomid is not a kind of a skullcap or it is not non-Kiplingesque or both is not right if it is not a kind of an escalation.; sent18 -> int7: the benzodiazepine is a Apollinaire if it is heterologous and not a drafting.; int7 & sent15 -> int8: the benzodiazepine is a kind of a Apollinaire.; int8 & sent5 -> int9: the benzodiazepine is a kind of a Apollinaire and ripens legend.; int9 -> int10: something is a Apollinaire and it does ripen legend.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the succinylcholine is not a subduer. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something is not a Gehrig but it is Kiplingesque is right then it is not a subduer. sent2: there exists something such that it is not a subduer. sent3: there is something such that the fact that it is not antisatellite is not wrong. sent4: if something impugns succinylcholine then that it is a kind of non-intradepartmental a Gehrig is not right. sent5: the benzodiazepine ripens legend. sent6: there is something such that that it is moonlit does not hold. sent7: there exists something such that it is not Kiplingesque. sent8: that the fact that something is not a skullcap or it is Kiplingesque or both is not correct if it is not an escalation is not incorrect. sent9: there is something such that that it is moonlit and/or it is antisatellite is not true. sent10: the succinylcholine is not moonlit. sent11: the cascarilla impugns succinylcholine. sent12: something is moonlit and/or it is antisatellite. sent13: if that that the cascarilla is not intradepartmental but it is a Gehrig hold is false then the succinylcholine is not a Gehrig. sent14: if the benzodiazepine is not a skullcap then the fact that the cascarilla does not impugn succinylcholine but it is a kind of a Gehrig is not correct. sent15: the benzodiazepine is both heterologous and not a drafting. sent16: if the fact that the catostomid is not a skullcap and/or is Kiplingesque is not right then the succinylcholine is Kiplingesque. sent17: if there is something such that that either it is moonlit or it is antisatellite or both is not true then the catostomid is not Kiplingesque. sent18: something is a Apollinaire if it is not non-heterologous and it does not draft. sent19: that the catostomid is a Gehrig if that the cascarilla does not impugn succinylcholine and is a kind of a Gehrig does not hold hold. sent20: if the catostomid is not Kiplingesque then the succinylcholine is a kind of a subduer. ; $proof$ = | sent9 & sent17 -> int1: the catostomid is not Kiplingesque.; sent20 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | there is something such that that it is moonlit and/or it is antisatellite is not true. | [
"if there is something such that that either it is moonlit or it is antisatellite or both is not true then the catostomid is not Kiplingesque.",
"if the catostomid is not Kiplingesque then the succinylcholine is a kind of a subduer."
] | [
"It is not true that it is moonlit.",
"It is not true that it is moonlit or antisatellite."
] | It is not true that it is moonlit or antisatellite. | if the catostomid is not Kiplingesque then the succinylcholine is a kind of a subduer. |
the rehearing cowrie does not occur. | sent1: that the flowage occurs and the kid occurs causes that the rehearing cowrie does not occur. sent2: both the flowage and the rehearing waxycap happens. sent3: both the nautch and the kid occurs. | ¬{D} | sent1: ({A} & {C}) -> ¬{D} sent2: ({A} & {B}) sent3: ({E} & {C}) | [
"sent2 -> int1: the flowage happens.; sent3 -> int2: the kid happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the flowage happens and the kid occurs.; int3 & sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent2 -> int1: {A}; sent3 -> int2: {C}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ({A} & {C}); int3 & sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | [] | null | null | $hypothesis$ = the rehearing cowrie does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the flowage occurs and the kid occurs causes that the rehearing cowrie does not occur. sent2: both the flowage and the rehearing waxycap happens. sent3: both the nautch and the kid occurs. ; $proof$ = | sent2 -> int1: the flowage happens.; sent3 -> int2: the kid happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the flowage happens and the kid occurs.; int3 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | both the flowage and the rehearing waxycap happens. | [
"both the nautch and the kid occurs.",
"that the flowage occurs and the kid occurs causes that the rehearing cowrie does not occur."
] | [
"The flowage and rehearing happen.",
"Both the flowage and rehearing happen."
] | The flowage and rehearing happen. | both the nautch and the kid occurs. |
the rehearing cowrie does not occur. | sent1: that the flowage occurs and the kid occurs causes that the rehearing cowrie does not occur. sent2: both the flowage and the rehearing waxycap happens. sent3: both the nautch and the kid occurs. | ¬{D} | sent1: ({A} & {C}) -> ¬{D} sent2: ({A} & {B}) sent3: ({E} & {C}) | [
"sent2 -> int1: the flowage happens.; sent3 -> int2: the kid happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the flowage happens and the kid occurs.; int3 & sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent2 -> int1: {A}; sent3 -> int2: {C}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ({A} & {C}); int3 & sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | [] | null | null | $hypothesis$ = the rehearing cowrie does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the flowage occurs and the kid occurs causes that the rehearing cowrie does not occur. sent2: both the flowage and the rehearing waxycap happens. sent3: both the nautch and the kid occurs. ; $proof$ = | sent2 -> int1: the flowage happens.; sent3 -> int2: the kid happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the flowage happens and the kid occurs.; int3 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | both the flowage and the rehearing waxycap happens. | [
"both the nautch and the kid occurs.",
"that the flowage occurs and the kid occurs causes that the rehearing cowrie does not occur."
] | [
"The flowage and rehearing happen.",
"Both the flowage and rehearing happen."
] | Both the flowage and rehearing happen. | that the flowage occurs and the kid occurs causes that the rehearing cowrie does not occur. |
the egalitarian does not rough internationalization. | sent1: there exists something such that either it is a Donetsk or it is not a latter or both. sent2: there exists something such that it is not splenic and/or it does not impugn litterbin. sent3: if something does impugn litterbin it does not rough opportunism or it is not flinty or both. sent4: the fact that if something does not impugn litterbin then it does not persuade and/or it does not include is correct. sent5: something does not rough internationalization if that it does not persuade and/or it does not include hold. sent6: either the dimity does not unpack or it impugns Elijah or both if it does not impugn litterbin. sent7: if the cousin is splenic then it does browse. sent8: the egalitarian does rough internationalization if that the egg rough internationalization and does not browse is not true. sent9: if something is not post-communist then the egalitarian does not offload. sent10: something is not a Aphriza or it is not prognathous or both. sent11: if there exists something such that it does not persuade the egalitarian does not impugn Kroeber. sent12: the fact that the vaudevillian does not impugn litterbin and it does not rough internationalization does not hold if the cousin browses. sent13: something is either not a mining or not ratlike or both. sent14: something either does not rehear capitation or is not a kind of a Palaemonidae or both if it is not husbandly. sent15: if the egalitarian is not flinty it persuades and/or does not understand. sent16: if something is not splenic and/or it does not impugn litterbin then the egalitarian does not impugn litterbin. sent17: if something does not impugn litigation then it is not a hillbilly and/or it is a filter. | ¬{B}{aa} | sent1: (Ex): ({FA}x v ¬{CH}x) sent2: (Ex): (¬{D}x v ¬{A}x) sent3: (x): {A}x -> (¬{AT}x v ¬{EQ}x) sent4: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x) sent5: (x): (¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent6: ¬{A}{ib} -> (¬{FL}{ib} v {CD}{ib}) sent7: {D}{c} -> {C}{c} sent8: ¬({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> {B}{aa} sent9: (x): ¬{GB}x -> ¬{IM}{aa} sent10: (Ex): (¬{CN}x v ¬{DH}x) sent11: (x): ¬{AA}x -> ¬{EF}{aa} sent12: {C}{c} -> ¬(¬{A}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) sent13: (Ex): (¬{GS}x v ¬{IR}x) sent14: (x): ¬{CK}x -> (¬{CO}x v ¬{AK}x) sent15: ¬{EQ}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} v ¬{EJ}{aa}) sent16: (x): (¬{D}x v ¬{A}x) -> ¬{A}{aa} sent17: (x): ¬{EA}x -> (¬{FE}x v {I}x) | [
"sent4 -> int1: either the egalitarian does not persuade or it does not include or both if that it does not impugn litterbin is not incorrect.; sent2 & sent16 -> int2: the egalitarian does not impugn litterbin.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the egalitarian does not persuade or it does not include or both.; sent5 -> int4: the egalitarian does not rough internationalization if it does not persuade and/or does not include.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent4 -> int1: ¬{A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}); sent2 & sent16 -> int2: ¬{A}{aa}; int1 & int2 -> int3: (¬{AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}); sent5 -> int4: (¬{AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa}; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 3 | 3 | 13 | 0 | 13 | either something does not rough opportunism or it is not flinty or both. | (Ex): (¬{AT}x v ¬{EQ}x) | 7 | [
"sent3 -> int5: the egg either does not rough opportunism or is non-flinty or both if it does impugn litterbin.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the egalitarian does not rough internationalization. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that either it is a Donetsk or it is not a latter or both. sent2: there exists something such that it is not splenic and/or it does not impugn litterbin. sent3: if something does impugn litterbin it does not rough opportunism or it is not flinty or both. sent4: the fact that if something does not impugn litterbin then it does not persuade and/or it does not include is correct. sent5: something does not rough internationalization if that it does not persuade and/or it does not include hold. sent6: either the dimity does not unpack or it impugns Elijah or both if it does not impugn litterbin. sent7: if the cousin is splenic then it does browse. sent8: the egalitarian does rough internationalization if that the egg rough internationalization and does not browse is not true. sent9: if something is not post-communist then the egalitarian does not offload. sent10: something is not a Aphriza or it is not prognathous or both. sent11: if there exists something such that it does not persuade the egalitarian does not impugn Kroeber. sent12: the fact that the vaudevillian does not impugn litterbin and it does not rough internationalization does not hold if the cousin browses. sent13: something is either not a mining or not ratlike or both. sent14: something either does not rehear capitation or is not a kind of a Palaemonidae or both if it is not husbandly. sent15: if the egalitarian is not flinty it persuades and/or does not understand. sent16: if something is not splenic and/or it does not impugn litterbin then the egalitarian does not impugn litterbin. sent17: if something does not impugn litigation then it is not a hillbilly and/or it is a filter. ; $proof$ = | sent4 -> int1: either the egalitarian does not persuade or it does not include or both if that it does not impugn litterbin is not incorrect.; sent2 & sent16 -> int2: the egalitarian does not impugn litterbin.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the egalitarian does not persuade or it does not include or both.; sent5 -> int4: the egalitarian does not rough internationalization if it does not persuade and/or does not include.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the fact that if something does not impugn litterbin then it does not persuade and/or it does not include is correct. | [
"there exists something such that it is not splenic and/or it does not impugn litterbin.",
"if something is not splenic and/or it does not impugn litterbin then the egalitarian does not impugn litterbin.",
"something does not rough internationalization if that it does not persuade and/or it does not include hold."
] | [
"The fact that something does not impugn litterbin is correct.",
"The fact that something doesn't impugn litterbin is correct.",
"It's correct that if something doesn't impugn litterbin, it doesn't persuade or it doesn't include."
] | The fact that something does not impugn litterbin is correct. | there exists something such that it is not splenic and/or it does not impugn litterbin. |
the egalitarian does not rough internationalization. | sent1: there exists something such that either it is a Donetsk or it is not a latter or both. sent2: there exists something such that it is not splenic and/or it does not impugn litterbin. sent3: if something does impugn litterbin it does not rough opportunism or it is not flinty or both. sent4: the fact that if something does not impugn litterbin then it does not persuade and/or it does not include is correct. sent5: something does not rough internationalization if that it does not persuade and/or it does not include hold. sent6: either the dimity does not unpack or it impugns Elijah or both if it does not impugn litterbin. sent7: if the cousin is splenic then it does browse. sent8: the egalitarian does rough internationalization if that the egg rough internationalization and does not browse is not true. sent9: if something is not post-communist then the egalitarian does not offload. sent10: something is not a Aphriza or it is not prognathous or both. sent11: if there exists something such that it does not persuade the egalitarian does not impugn Kroeber. sent12: the fact that the vaudevillian does not impugn litterbin and it does not rough internationalization does not hold if the cousin browses. sent13: something is either not a mining or not ratlike or both. sent14: something either does not rehear capitation or is not a kind of a Palaemonidae or both if it is not husbandly. sent15: if the egalitarian is not flinty it persuades and/or does not understand. sent16: if something is not splenic and/or it does not impugn litterbin then the egalitarian does not impugn litterbin. sent17: if something does not impugn litigation then it is not a hillbilly and/or it is a filter. | ¬{B}{aa} | sent1: (Ex): ({FA}x v ¬{CH}x) sent2: (Ex): (¬{D}x v ¬{A}x) sent3: (x): {A}x -> (¬{AT}x v ¬{EQ}x) sent4: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x) sent5: (x): (¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent6: ¬{A}{ib} -> (¬{FL}{ib} v {CD}{ib}) sent7: {D}{c} -> {C}{c} sent8: ¬({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> {B}{aa} sent9: (x): ¬{GB}x -> ¬{IM}{aa} sent10: (Ex): (¬{CN}x v ¬{DH}x) sent11: (x): ¬{AA}x -> ¬{EF}{aa} sent12: {C}{c} -> ¬(¬{A}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) sent13: (Ex): (¬{GS}x v ¬{IR}x) sent14: (x): ¬{CK}x -> (¬{CO}x v ¬{AK}x) sent15: ¬{EQ}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} v ¬{EJ}{aa}) sent16: (x): (¬{D}x v ¬{A}x) -> ¬{A}{aa} sent17: (x): ¬{EA}x -> (¬{FE}x v {I}x) | [
"sent4 -> int1: either the egalitarian does not persuade or it does not include or both if that it does not impugn litterbin is not incorrect.; sent2 & sent16 -> int2: the egalitarian does not impugn litterbin.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the egalitarian does not persuade or it does not include or both.; sent5 -> int4: the egalitarian does not rough internationalization if it does not persuade and/or does not include.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent4 -> int1: ¬{A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}); sent2 & sent16 -> int2: ¬{A}{aa}; int1 & int2 -> int3: (¬{AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}); sent5 -> int4: (¬{AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa}; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 3 | 3 | 13 | 0 | 13 | either something does not rough opportunism or it is not flinty or both. | (Ex): (¬{AT}x v ¬{EQ}x) | 7 | [
"sent3 -> int5: the egg either does not rough opportunism or is non-flinty or both if it does impugn litterbin.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the egalitarian does not rough internationalization. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that either it is a Donetsk or it is not a latter or both. sent2: there exists something such that it is not splenic and/or it does not impugn litterbin. sent3: if something does impugn litterbin it does not rough opportunism or it is not flinty or both. sent4: the fact that if something does not impugn litterbin then it does not persuade and/or it does not include is correct. sent5: something does not rough internationalization if that it does not persuade and/or it does not include hold. sent6: either the dimity does not unpack or it impugns Elijah or both if it does not impugn litterbin. sent7: if the cousin is splenic then it does browse. sent8: the egalitarian does rough internationalization if that the egg rough internationalization and does not browse is not true. sent9: if something is not post-communist then the egalitarian does not offload. sent10: something is not a Aphriza or it is not prognathous or both. sent11: if there exists something such that it does not persuade the egalitarian does not impugn Kroeber. sent12: the fact that the vaudevillian does not impugn litterbin and it does not rough internationalization does not hold if the cousin browses. sent13: something is either not a mining or not ratlike or both. sent14: something either does not rehear capitation or is not a kind of a Palaemonidae or both if it is not husbandly. sent15: if the egalitarian is not flinty it persuades and/or does not understand. sent16: if something is not splenic and/or it does not impugn litterbin then the egalitarian does not impugn litterbin. sent17: if something does not impugn litigation then it is not a hillbilly and/or it is a filter. ; $proof$ = | sent4 -> int1: either the egalitarian does not persuade or it does not include or both if that it does not impugn litterbin is not incorrect.; sent2 & sent16 -> int2: the egalitarian does not impugn litterbin.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the egalitarian does not persuade or it does not include or both.; sent5 -> int4: the egalitarian does not rough internationalization if it does not persuade and/or does not include.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the fact that if something does not impugn litterbin then it does not persuade and/or it does not include is correct. | [
"there exists something such that it is not splenic and/or it does not impugn litterbin.",
"if something is not splenic and/or it does not impugn litterbin then the egalitarian does not impugn litterbin.",
"something does not rough internationalization if that it does not persuade and/or it does not include hold."
] | [
"The fact that something does not impugn litterbin is correct.",
"The fact that something doesn't impugn litterbin is correct.",
"It's correct that if something doesn't impugn litterbin, it doesn't persuade or it doesn't include."
] | The fact that something doesn't impugn litterbin is correct. | if something is not splenic and/or it does not impugn litterbin then the egalitarian does not impugn litterbin. |
the egalitarian does not rough internationalization. | sent1: there exists something such that either it is a Donetsk or it is not a latter or both. sent2: there exists something such that it is not splenic and/or it does not impugn litterbin. sent3: if something does impugn litterbin it does not rough opportunism or it is not flinty or both. sent4: the fact that if something does not impugn litterbin then it does not persuade and/or it does not include is correct. sent5: something does not rough internationalization if that it does not persuade and/or it does not include hold. sent6: either the dimity does not unpack or it impugns Elijah or both if it does not impugn litterbin. sent7: if the cousin is splenic then it does browse. sent8: the egalitarian does rough internationalization if that the egg rough internationalization and does not browse is not true. sent9: if something is not post-communist then the egalitarian does not offload. sent10: something is not a Aphriza or it is not prognathous or both. sent11: if there exists something such that it does not persuade the egalitarian does not impugn Kroeber. sent12: the fact that the vaudevillian does not impugn litterbin and it does not rough internationalization does not hold if the cousin browses. sent13: something is either not a mining or not ratlike or both. sent14: something either does not rehear capitation or is not a kind of a Palaemonidae or both if it is not husbandly. sent15: if the egalitarian is not flinty it persuades and/or does not understand. sent16: if something is not splenic and/or it does not impugn litterbin then the egalitarian does not impugn litterbin. sent17: if something does not impugn litigation then it is not a hillbilly and/or it is a filter. | ¬{B}{aa} | sent1: (Ex): ({FA}x v ¬{CH}x) sent2: (Ex): (¬{D}x v ¬{A}x) sent3: (x): {A}x -> (¬{AT}x v ¬{EQ}x) sent4: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x) sent5: (x): (¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent6: ¬{A}{ib} -> (¬{FL}{ib} v {CD}{ib}) sent7: {D}{c} -> {C}{c} sent8: ¬({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> {B}{aa} sent9: (x): ¬{GB}x -> ¬{IM}{aa} sent10: (Ex): (¬{CN}x v ¬{DH}x) sent11: (x): ¬{AA}x -> ¬{EF}{aa} sent12: {C}{c} -> ¬(¬{A}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) sent13: (Ex): (¬{GS}x v ¬{IR}x) sent14: (x): ¬{CK}x -> (¬{CO}x v ¬{AK}x) sent15: ¬{EQ}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} v ¬{EJ}{aa}) sent16: (x): (¬{D}x v ¬{A}x) -> ¬{A}{aa} sent17: (x): ¬{EA}x -> (¬{FE}x v {I}x) | [
"sent4 -> int1: either the egalitarian does not persuade or it does not include or both if that it does not impugn litterbin is not incorrect.; sent2 & sent16 -> int2: the egalitarian does not impugn litterbin.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the egalitarian does not persuade or it does not include or both.; sent5 -> int4: the egalitarian does not rough internationalization if it does not persuade and/or does not include.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent4 -> int1: ¬{A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}); sent2 & sent16 -> int2: ¬{A}{aa}; int1 & int2 -> int3: (¬{AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}); sent5 -> int4: (¬{AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa}; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 3 | 3 | 13 | 0 | 13 | either something does not rough opportunism or it is not flinty or both. | (Ex): (¬{AT}x v ¬{EQ}x) | 7 | [
"sent3 -> int5: the egg either does not rough opportunism or is non-flinty or both if it does impugn litterbin.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the egalitarian does not rough internationalization. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that either it is a Donetsk or it is not a latter or both. sent2: there exists something such that it is not splenic and/or it does not impugn litterbin. sent3: if something does impugn litterbin it does not rough opportunism or it is not flinty or both. sent4: the fact that if something does not impugn litterbin then it does not persuade and/or it does not include is correct. sent5: something does not rough internationalization if that it does not persuade and/or it does not include hold. sent6: either the dimity does not unpack or it impugns Elijah or both if it does not impugn litterbin. sent7: if the cousin is splenic then it does browse. sent8: the egalitarian does rough internationalization if that the egg rough internationalization and does not browse is not true. sent9: if something is not post-communist then the egalitarian does not offload. sent10: something is not a Aphriza or it is not prognathous or both. sent11: if there exists something such that it does not persuade the egalitarian does not impugn Kroeber. sent12: the fact that the vaudevillian does not impugn litterbin and it does not rough internationalization does not hold if the cousin browses. sent13: something is either not a mining or not ratlike or both. sent14: something either does not rehear capitation or is not a kind of a Palaemonidae or both if it is not husbandly. sent15: if the egalitarian is not flinty it persuades and/or does not understand. sent16: if something is not splenic and/or it does not impugn litterbin then the egalitarian does not impugn litterbin. sent17: if something does not impugn litigation then it is not a hillbilly and/or it is a filter. ; $proof$ = | sent4 -> int1: either the egalitarian does not persuade or it does not include or both if that it does not impugn litterbin is not incorrect.; sent2 & sent16 -> int2: the egalitarian does not impugn litterbin.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the egalitarian does not persuade or it does not include or both.; sent5 -> int4: the egalitarian does not rough internationalization if it does not persuade and/or does not include.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the fact that if something does not impugn litterbin then it does not persuade and/or it does not include is correct. | [
"there exists something such that it is not splenic and/or it does not impugn litterbin.",
"if something is not splenic and/or it does not impugn litterbin then the egalitarian does not impugn litterbin.",
"something does not rough internationalization if that it does not persuade and/or it does not include hold."
] | [
"The fact that something does not impugn litterbin is correct.",
"The fact that something doesn't impugn litterbin is correct.",
"It's correct that if something doesn't impugn litterbin, it doesn't persuade or it doesn't include."
] | It's correct that if something doesn't impugn litterbin, it doesn't persuade or it doesn't include. | something does not rough internationalization if that it does not persuade and/or it does not include hold. |
the fenoprofen is not a wood-fern. | sent1: if the californium is not fatty and/or is not chylific then the fenoprofen is not a kind of a wood-fern. sent2: either the californium is not fatty or it is chylific or both if the sister-in-law is not an eon. sent3: the sister-in-law does not luxuriate. sent4: the learner is a ministry. sent5: the fact that that the californium is a kind of febrile thing that impugns ultimatum is true is not true if something does not impugns ultimatum. sent6: the sister-in-law is not chylific if the fact that either the californium is not an eon or it is not fatty or both hold. sent7: if that something is febrile and does impugn ultimatum is wrong it does not impugn ultimatum. sent8: if the sister-in-law is not a kind of an eon the californium is fatty and/or it is non-chylific. sent9: the phlogiston does not impugn ultimatum if the learner is a kind of a ministry and is a loot. sent10: either the californium is fatty or it is not chylific or both. sent11: the californium is not fatty and/or it is chylific. sent12: if the fenoprofen is not fatty the californium is not a kind of an eon and/or is not a wood-fern. sent13: that the sister-in-law is a kind of a spin and it is a kind of an eon is wrong if the californium does not impugn ultimatum. sent14: everything does loot and does ripen cephalometry. sent15: the californium is not fatty and/or it is not chylific if the sister-in-law is not a kind of an eon. sent16: the sister-in-law is not an eon. | ¬{B}{c} | sent1: (¬{AA}{b} v ¬{AB}{b}) -> ¬{B}{c} sent2: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{b} v {AB}{b}) sent3: ¬{FK}{a} sent4: {E}{e} sent5: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬({F}{b} & {D}{b}) sent6: (¬{A}{b} v ¬{AA}{b}) -> ¬{AB}{a} sent7: (x): ¬({F}x & {D}x) -> ¬{D}x sent8: ¬{A}{a} -> ({AA}{b} v ¬{AB}{b}) sent9: ({E}{e} & {G}{e}) -> ¬{D}{d} sent10: ({AA}{b} v ¬{AB}{b}) sent11: (¬{AA}{b} v {AB}{b}) sent12: ¬{AA}{c} -> (¬{A}{b} v ¬{B}{b}) sent13: ¬{D}{b} -> ¬({C}{a} & {A}{a}) sent14: (x): ({G}x & {H}x) sent15: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{b} v ¬{AB}{b}) sent16: ¬{A}{a} | [
"sent15 & sent16 -> int1: the californium is non-fatty or non-chylific or both.; sent1 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent15 & sent16 -> int1: (¬{AA}{b} v ¬{AB}{b}); sent1 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 2 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 13 | the fact that the fenoprofen is a wood-fern is not wrong. | {B}{c} | 10 | [
"sent7 -> int2: the californium does not impugn ultimatum if that it is febrile and impugn ultimatum does not hold.; sent14 -> int3: the learner is a loot that ripens cephalometry.; int3 -> int4: the learner is a kind of a loot.; sent4 & int4 -> int5: the learner is a ministry and it is a loot.; sent9 & int5 -> int6: the phlogiston does not impugn ultimatum.; int6 -> int7: something does not impugn ultimatum.; int7 & sent5 -> int8: that the californium is febrile and it does impugn ultimatum is incorrect.; int2 & int8 -> int9: the californium does not impugn ultimatum.; sent13 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the sister-in-law is a kind of a spin and it is a kind of an eon is false.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that the fact that it is a spin that is an eon is not true.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fenoprofen is not a wood-fern. ; $context$ = sent1: if the californium is not fatty and/or is not chylific then the fenoprofen is not a kind of a wood-fern. sent2: either the californium is not fatty or it is chylific or both if the sister-in-law is not an eon. sent3: the sister-in-law does not luxuriate. sent4: the learner is a ministry. sent5: the fact that that the californium is a kind of febrile thing that impugns ultimatum is true is not true if something does not impugns ultimatum. sent6: the sister-in-law is not chylific if the fact that either the californium is not an eon or it is not fatty or both hold. sent7: if that something is febrile and does impugn ultimatum is wrong it does not impugn ultimatum. sent8: if the sister-in-law is not a kind of an eon the californium is fatty and/or it is non-chylific. sent9: the phlogiston does not impugn ultimatum if the learner is a kind of a ministry and is a loot. sent10: either the californium is fatty or it is not chylific or both. sent11: the californium is not fatty and/or it is chylific. sent12: if the fenoprofen is not fatty the californium is not a kind of an eon and/or is not a wood-fern. sent13: that the sister-in-law is a kind of a spin and it is a kind of an eon is wrong if the californium does not impugn ultimatum. sent14: everything does loot and does ripen cephalometry. sent15: the californium is not fatty and/or it is not chylific if the sister-in-law is not a kind of an eon. sent16: the sister-in-law is not an eon. ; $proof$ = | sent15 & sent16 -> int1: the californium is non-fatty or non-chylific or both.; sent1 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the californium is not fatty and/or it is not chylific if the sister-in-law is not a kind of an eon. | [
"the sister-in-law is not an eon.",
"if the californium is not fatty and/or is not chylific then the fenoprofen is not a kind of a wood-fern."
] | [
"If the sister-in-law is not a kind of eon, the californium is not chylific.",
"It is not chylific if the sister-in-law is not a kind of eon."
] | If the sister-in-law is not a kind of eon, the californium is not chylific. | the sister-in-law is not an eon. |