hypothesis
stringlengths
11
177
context
stringlengths
0
2.71k
hypothesis_formula
stringlengths
3
35
context_formula
stringlengths
0
865
proofs
sequence
proof_label
stringclasses
3 values
proofs_formula
sequence
world_assump_label
stringclasses
3 values
original_tree_depth
int64
1
4
depth
int64
1
3
num_formula_distractors
int64
0
22
num_translation_distractors
int64
0
0
num_all_distractors
int64
0
22
negative_hypothesis
stringlengths
15
158
negative_hypothesis_formula
stringlengths
3
37
negative_original_tree_depth
int64
0
25
negative_proofs
sequence
negative_proof_label
stringclasses
2 values
negative_world_assump_label
stringclasses
2 values
prompt_serial
stringlengths
99
2.85k
proof_serial
stringlengths
11
654
version
stringclasses
1 value
premise
stringlengths
0
188
assumptions
sequence
paraphrased_premises
sequence
paraphrased_premise
stringlengths
0
753
assumption
stringlengths
0
200
the citrulline is not a needlefish.
sent1: if something is a Aspidiotus it repositions dopamine. sent2: if something is not a mound then the fact that it is a kind of a needlefish and is a Antiguan is not right. sent3: the dopamine does mound. sent4: if the dopamine is a mound then the citrulline is a kind of a Antiguan. sent5: something is a needlefish if it is a Antiguan.
¬{C}{b}
sent1: (x): {HR}x -> {HI}x sent2: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({C}x & {B}x) sent3: {A}{a} sent4: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} sent5: (x): {B}x -> {C}x
[ "sent4 & sent3 -> int1: the fact that the citrulline is Antiguan hold.; sent5 -> int2: the citrulline is a needlefish if it is a Antiguan.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
[ "sent4 & sent3 -> int1: {B}{b}; sent5 -> int2: {B}{b} -> {C}{b}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
2
2
2
0
2
that the exit repositions dopamine hold if it is a Aspidiotus.
{HR}{hq} -> {HI}{hq}
1
[ "sent1 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
PROVED
$hypothesis$ = the citrulline is not a needlefish. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a Aspidiotus it repositions dopamine. sent2: if something is not a mound then the fact that it is a kind of a needlefish and is a Antiguan is not right. sent3: the dopamine does mound. sent4: if the dopamine is a mound then the citrulline is a kind of a Antiguan. sent5: something is a needlefish if it is a Antiguan. ; $proof$ =
sent4 & sent3 -> int1: the fact that the citrulline is Antiguan hold.; sent5 -> int2: the citrulline is a needlefish if it is a Antiguan.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
DeductionInstance
if the dopamine is a mound then the citrulline is a kind of a Antiguan.
[ "the dopamine does mound.", "something is a needlefish if it is a Antiguan." ]
[ "The citrulline is a kind of Antiguan if the dopamine is a mound.", "The citrulline is a kind of Antiguan, if the dopamine is a mound." ]
The citrulline is a kind of Antiguan if the dopamine is a mound.
the dopamine does mound.
the citrulline is not a needlefish.
sent1: if something is a Aspidiotus it repositions dopamine. sent2: if something is not a mound then the fact that it is a kind of a needlefish and is a Antiguan is not right. sent3: the dopamine does mound. sent4: if the dopamine is a mound then the citrulline is a kind of a Antiguan. sent5: something is a needlefish if it is a Antiguan.
¬{C}{b}
sent1: (x): {HR}x -> {HI}x sent2: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({C}x & {B}x) sent3: {A}{a} sent4: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} sent5: (x): {B}x -> {C}x
[ "sent4 & sent3 -> int1: the fact that the citrulline is Antiguan hold.; sent5 -> int2: the citrulline is a needlefish if it is a Antiguan.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
[ "sent4 & sent3 -> int1: {B}{b}; sent5 -> int2: {B}{b} -> {C}{b}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
2
2
2
0
2
that the exit repositions dopamine hold if it is a Aspidiotus.
{HR}{hq} -> {HI}{hq}
1
[ "sent1 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
PROVED
$hypothesis$ = the citrulline is not a needlefish. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a Aspidiotus it repositions dopamine. sent2: if something is not a mound then the fact that it is a kind of a needlefish and is a Antiguan is not right. sent3: the dopamine does mound. sent4: if the dopamine is a mound then the citrulline is a kind of a Antiguan. sent5: something is a needlefish if it is a Antiguan. ; $proof$ =
sent4 & sent3 -> int1: the fact that the citrulline is Antiguan hold.; sent5 -> int2: the citrulline is a needlefish if it is a Antiguan.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
DeductionInstance
if the dopamine is a mound then the citrulline is a kind of a Antiguan.
[ "the dopamine does mound.", "something is a needlefish if it is a Antiguan." ]
[ "The citrulline is a kind of Antiguan if the dopamine is a mound.", "The citrulline is a kind of Antiguan, if the dopamine is a mound." ]
The citrulline is a kind of Antiguan, if the dopamine is a mound.
something is a needlefish if it is a Antiguan.
the poon does recommend Dawson.
sent1: something is not a kind of a hang-up if it is not compassionate and it is non-south. sent2: if something is not a congealment then either it is not compassionate or it is not a south or both. sent3: if the engine is a kind of a radiocarbon and it is a kind of a hang-up the fact that the poon does not recommend Dawson hold. sent4: if the fact that the engine is not mithraic but it is a congealment is not wrong then it is non-south. sent5: if there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a vertical and it is not harmful is false the engine is not compassionate. sent6: if the engine is a radiocarbon and does not recommend Dawson then the poon recommend Dawson. sent7: the fact that the poon is a photocoagulation is correct. sent8: something is mithraic. sent9: that the engine is ill or it is not a cream or both does not hold. sent10: the girasol is not a retailing. sent11: that something is not a vertical but it is harmless is not true if it is not a kind of a retailing. sent12: something is a radiocarbon and does not recommend Dawson if it is not a hang-up. sent13: the engine is a kind of a hang-up. sent14: the engine creams and/or it is a hang-up if the poon is not a radiocarbon. sent15: that the poon is a hang-up is not incorrect. sent16: that the engine is a kind of a cream is true. sent17: if the lactogen is either not compassionate or not a south or both the girasol is south. sent18: the engine is a radiocarbon if that it is ill and/or it does not cream is wrong. sent19: the lactogen is not a congealment. sent20: if the settle does recommend Dawson then the girasol recommend Dawson.
{C}{b}
sent1: (x): (¬{E}x & ¬{D}x) -> ¬{A}x sent2: (x): ¬{G}x -> (¬{E}x v ¬{D}x) sent3: ({B}{a} & {A}{a}) -> ¬{C}{b} sent4: (¬{F}{a} & {G}{a}) -> ¬{D}{a} sent5: (x): ¬(¬{I}x & {H}x) -> ¬{E}{a} sent6: ({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> {C}{b} sent7: {EL}{b} sent8: (Ex): {F}x sent9: ¬({AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) sent10: ¬{J}{c} sent11: (x): ¬{J}x -> ¬(¬{I}x & {H}x) sent12: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({B}x & ¬{C}x) sent13: {A}{a} sent14: ¬{B}{b} -> ({AB}{a} v {A}{a}) sent15: {A}{b} sent16: {AB}{a} sent17: (¬{E}{d} v ¬{D}{d}) -> {D}{c} sent18: ¬({AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} sent19: ¬{G}{d} sent20: {C}{e} -> {C}{c}
[ "sent18 & sent9 -> int1: the engine is a radiocarbon.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the engine is a radiocarbon and it is a hang-up.; int2 & sent3 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
[ "sent18 & sent9 -> int1: {B}{a}; int1 & sent13 -> int2: ({B}{a} & {A}{a}); int2 & sent3 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
3
3
16
0
16
the blackthorn creams.
{AB}{fb}
8
[ "sent2 -> int3: if the lactogen is not a congealment then it is not compassionate and/or is not a south.; int3 & sent19 -> int4: the lactogen is either not compassionate or not a south or both.; sent17 & int4 -> int5: the girasol is a kind of a south.;" ]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the poon does recommend Dawson. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a kind of a hang-up if it is not compassionate and it is non-south. sent2: if something is not a congealment then either it is not compassionate or it is not a south or both. sent3: if the engine is a kind of a radiocarbon and it is a kind of a hang-up the fact that the poon does not recommend Dawson hold. sent4: if the fact that the engine is not mithraic but it is a congealment is not wrong then it is non-south. sent5: if there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a vertical and it is not harmful is false the engine is not compassionate. sent6: if the engine is a radiocarbon and does not recommend Dawson then the poon recommend Dawson. sent7: the fact that the poon is a photocoagulation is correct. sent8: something is mithraic. sent9: that the engine is ill or it is not a cream or both does not hold. sent10: the girasol is not a retailing. sent11: that something is not a vertical but it is harmless is not true if it is not a kind of a retailing. sent12: something is a radiocarbon and does not recommend Dawson if it is not a hang-up. sent13: the engine is a kind of a hang-up. sent14: the engine creams and/or it is a hang-up if the poon is not a radiocarbon. sent15: that the poon is a hang-up is not incorrect. sent16: that the engine is a kind of a cream is true. sent17: if the lactogen is either not compassionate or not a south or both the girasol is south. sent18: the engine is a radiocarbon if that it is ill and/or it does not cream is wrong. sent19: the lactogen is not a congealment. sent20: if the settle does recommend Dawson then the girasol recommend Dawson. ; $proof$ =
sent18 & sent9 -> int1: the engine is a radiocarbon.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the engine is a radiocarbon and it is a hang-up.; int2 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
DeductionInstance
the engine is a radiocarbon if that it is ill and/or it does not cream is wrong.
[ "that the engine is ill or it is not a cream or both does not hold.", "the engine is a kind of a hang-up.", "if the engine is a kind of a radiocarbon and it is a kind of a hang-up the fact that the poon does not recommend Dawson hold." ]
[ "The engine is a radiocarbon if it is ill or not.", "If the engine is ill or not, it is a radiocarbon.", "The engine can be a radiocarbon if it is ill or not." ]
The engine is a radiocarbon if it is ill or not.
that the engine is ill or it is not a cream or both does not hold.
the poon does recommend Dawson.
sent1: something is not a kind of a hang-up if it is not compassionate and it is non-south. sent2: if something is not a congealment then either it is not compassionate or it is not a south or both. sent3: if the engine is a kind of a radiocarbon and it is a kind of a hang-up the fact that the poon does not recommend Dawson hold. sent4: if the fact that the engine is not mithraic but it is a congealment is not wrong then it is non-south. sent5: if there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a vertical and it is not harmful is false the engine is not compassionate. sent6: if the engine is a radiocarbon and does not recommend Dawson then the poon recommend Dawson. sent7: the fact that the poon is a photocoagulation is correct. sent8: something is mithraic. sent9: that the engine is ill or it is not a cream or both does not hold. sent10: the girasol is not a retailing. sent11: that something is not a vertical but it is harmless is not true if it is not a kind of a retailing. sent12: something is a radiocarbon and does not recommend Dawson if it is not a hang-up. sent13: the engine is a kind of a hang-up. sent14: the engine creams and/or it is a hang-up if the poon is not a radiocarbon. sent15: that the poon is a hang-up is not incorrect. sent16: that the engine is a kind of a cream is true. sent17: if the lactogen is either not compassionate or not a south or both the girasol is south. sent18: the engine is a radiocarbon if that it is ill and/or it does not cream is wrong. sent19: the lactogen is not a congealment. sent20: if the settle does recommend Dawson then the girasol recommend Dawson.
{C}{b}
sent1: (x): (¬{E}x & ¬{D}x) -> ¬{A}x sent2: (x): ¬{G}x -> (¬{E}x v ¬{D}x) sent3: ({B}{a} & {A}{a}) -> ¬{C}{b} sent4: (¬{F}{a} & {G}{a}) -> ¬{D}{a} sent5: (x): ¬(¬{I}x & {H}x) -> ¬{E}{a} sent6: ({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> {C}{b} sent7: {EL}{b} sent8: (Ex): {F}x sent9: ¬({AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) sent10: ¬{J}{c} sent11: (x): ¬{J}x -> ¬(¬{I}x & {H}x) sent12: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({B}x & ¬{C}x) sent13: {A}{a} sent14: ¬{B}{b} -> ({AB}{a} v {A}{a}) sent15: {A}{b} sent16: {AB}{a} sent17: (¬{E}{d} v ¬{D}{d}) -> {D}{c} sent18: ¬({AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} sent19: ¬{G}{d} sent20: {C}{e} -> {C}{c}
[ "sent18 & sent9 -> int1: the engine is a radiocarbon.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the engine is a radiocarbon and it is a hang-up.; int2 & sent3 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
[ "sent18 & sent9 -> int1: {B}{a}; int1 & sent13 -> int2: ({B}{a} & {A}{a}); int2 & sent3 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
3
3
16
0
16
the blackthorn creams.
{AB}{fb}
8
[ "sent2 -> int3: if the lactogen is not a congealment then it is not compassionate and/or is not a south.; int3 & sent19 -> int4: the lactogen is either not compassionate or not a south or both.; sent17 & int4 -> int5: the girasol is a kind of a south.;" ]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the poon does recommend Dawson. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a kind of a hang-up if it is not compassionate and it is non-south. sent2: if something is not a congealment then either it is not compassionate or it is not a south or both. sent3: if the engine is a kind of a radiocarbon and it is a kind of a hang-up the fact that the poon does not recommend Dawson hold. sent4: if the fact that the engine is not mithraic but it is a congealment is not wrong then it is non-south. sent5: if there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a vertical and it is not harmful is false the engine is not compassionate. sent6: if the engine is a radiocarbon and does not recommend Dawson then the poon recommend Dawson. sent7: the fact that the poon is a photocoagulation is correct. sent8: something is mithraic. sent9: that the engine is ill or it is not a cream or both does not hold. sent10: the girasol is not a retailing. sent11: that something is not a vertical but it is harmless is not true if it is not a kind of a retailing. sent12: something is a radiocarbon and does not recommend Dawson if it is not a hang-up. sent13: the engine is a kind of a hang-up. sent14: the engine creams and/or it is a hang-up if the poon is not a radiocarbon. sent15: that the poon is a hang-up is not incorrect. sent16: that the engine is a kind of a cream is true. sent17: if the lactogen is either not compassionate or not a south or both the girasol is south. sent18: the engine is a radiocarbon if that it is ill and/or it does not cream is wrong. sent19: the lactogen is not a congealment. sent20: if the settle does recommend Dawson then the girasol recommend Dawson. ; $proof$ =
sent18 & sent9 -> int1: the engine is a radiocarbon.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the engine is a radiocarbon and it is a hang-up.; int2 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
DeductionInstance
the engine is a radiocarbon if that it is ill and/or it does not cream is wrong.
[ "that the engine is ill or it is not a cream or both does not hold.", "the engine is a kind of a hang-up.", "if the engine is a kind of a radiocarbon and it is a kind of a hang-up the fact that the poon does not recommend Dawson hold." ]
[ "The engine is a radiocarbon if it is ill or not.", "If the engine is ill or not, it is a radiocarbon.", "The engine can be a radiocarbon if it is ill or not." ]
If the engine is ill or not, it is a radiocarbon.
the engine is a kind of a hang-up.
the poon does recommend Dawson.
sent1: something is not a kind of a hang-up if it is not compassionate and it is non-south. sent2: if something is not a congealment then either it is not compassionate or it is not a south or both. sent3: if the engine is a kind of a radiocarbon and it is a kind of a hang-up the fact that the poon does not recommend Dawson hold. sent4: if the fact that the engine is not mithraic but it is a congealment is not wrong then it is non-south. sent5: if there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a vertical and it is not harmful is false the engine is not compassionate. sent6: if the engine is a radiocarbon and does not recommend Dawson then the poon recommend Dawson. sent7: the fact that the poon is a photocoagulation is correct. sent8: something is mithraic. sent9: that the engine is ill or it is not a cream or both does not hold. sent10: the girasol is not a retailing. sent11: that something is not a vertical but it is harmless is not true if it is not a kind of a retailing. sent12: something is a radiocarbon and does not recommend Dawson if it is not a hang-up. sent13: the engine is a kind of a hang-up. sent14: the engine creams and/or it is a hang-up if the poon is not a radiocarbon. sent15: that the poon is a hang-up is not incorrect. sent16: that the engine is a kind of a cream is true. sent17: if the lactogen is either not compassionate or not a south or both the girasol is south. sent18: the engine is a radiocarbon if that it is ill and/or it does not cream is wrong. sent19: the lactogen is not a congealment. sent20: if the settle does recommend Dawson then the girasol recommend Dawson.
{C}{b}
sent1: (x): (¬{E}x & ¬{D}x) -> ¬{A}x sent2: (x): ¬{G}x -> (¬{E}x v ¬{D}x) sent3: ({B}{a} & {A}{a}) -> ¬{C}{b} sent4: (¬{F}{a} & {G}{a}) -> ¬{D}{a} sent5: (x): ¬(¬{I}x & {H}x) -> ¬{E}{a} sent6: ({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> {C}{b} sent7: {EL}{b} sent8: (Ex): {F}x sent9: ¬({AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) sent10: ¬{J}{c} sent11: (x): ¬{J}x -> ¬(¬{I}x & {H}x) sent12: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({B}x & ¬{C}x) sent13: {A}{a} sent14: ¬{B}{b} -> ({AB}{a} v {A}{a}) sent15: {A}{b} sent16: {AB}{a} sent17: (¬{E}{d} v ¬{D}{d}) -> {D}{c} sent18: ¬({AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} sent19: ¬{G}{d} sent20: {C}{e} -> {C}{c}
[ "sent18 & sent9 -> int1: the engine is a radiocarbon.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the engine is a radiocarbon and it is a hang-up.; int2 & sent3 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
[ "sent18 & sent9 -> int1: {B}{a}; int1 & sent13 -> int2: ({B}{a} & {A}{a}); int2 & sent3 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
3
3
16
0
16
the blackthorn creams.
{AB}{fb}
8
[ "sent2 -> int3: if the lactogen is not a congealment then it is not compassionate and/or is not a south.; int3 & sent19 -> int4: the lactogen is either not compassionate or not a south or both.; sent17 & int4 -> int5: the girasol is a kind of a south.;" ]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the poon does recommend Dawson. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a kind of a hang-up if it is not compassionate and it is non-south. sent2: if something is not a congealment then either it is not compassionate or it is not a south or both. sent3: if the engine is a kind of a radiocarbon and it is a kind of a hang-up the fact that the poon does not recommend Dawson hold. sent4: if the fact that the engine is not mithraic but it is a congealment is not wrong then it is non-south. sent5: if there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a vertical and it is not harmful is false the engine is not compassionate. sent6: if the engine is a radiocarbon and does not recommend Dawson then the poon recommend Dawson. sent7: the fact that the poon is a photocoagulation is correct. sent8: something is mithraic. sent9: that the engine is ill or it is not a cream or both does not hold. sent10: the girasol is not a retailing. sent11: that something is not a vertical but it is harmless is not true if it is not a kind of a retailing. sent12: something is a radiocarbon and does not recommend Dawson if it is not a hang-up. sent13: the engine is a kind of a hang-up. sent14: the engine creams and/or it is a hang-up if the poon is not a radiocarbon. sent15: that the poon is a hang-up is not incorrect. sent16: that the engine is a kind of a cream is true. sent17: if the lactogen is either not compassionate or not a south or both the girasol is south. sent18: the engine is a radiocarbon if that it is ill and/or it does not cream is wrong. sent19: the lactogen is not a congealment. sent20: if the settle does recommend Dawson then the girasol recommend Dawson. ; $proof$ =
sent18 & sent9 -> int1: the engine is a radiocarbon.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the engine is a radiocarbon and it is a hang-up.; int2 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
DeductionInstance
the engine is a radiocarbon if that it is ill and/or it does not cream is wrong.
[ "that the engine is ill or it is not a cream or both does not hold.", "the engine is a kind of a hang-up.", "if the engine is a kind of a radiocarbon and it is a kind of a hang-up the fact that the poon does not recommend Dawson hold." ]
[ "The engine is a radiocarbon if it is ill or not.", "If the engine is ill or not, it is a radiocarbon.", "The engine can be a radiocarbon if it is ill or not." ]
The engine can be a radiocarbon if it is ill or not.
if the engine is a kind of a radiocarbon and it is a kind of a hang-up the fact that the poon does not recommend Dawson hold.
that the pyroxylin is finer and/or it is not a twenty-eight is wrong.
sent1: the pyroxylin does recommend check. sent2: if the pyroxylin does suffer Vespidae it is not a Changtzu. sent3: if the pyroxylin does not recommend Astaire then that it is septal or it is not a Changtzu or both does not hold. sent4: the funiculus is not a twenty-eight. sent5: the pyroxylin does suffer Vespidae. sent6: the pyroxylin is not finer if that it is not a Changtzu is true. sent7: if the sprayer recommends elaborateness and is a Changtzu it does not suffer Vespidae. sent8: The Vespidae does suffer pyroxylin.
¬({AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa})
sent1: {HA}{aa} sent2: {B}{aa} -> ¬{A}{aa} sent3: ¬{AR}{aa} -> ¬({JB}{aa} v ¬{A}{aa}) sent4: ¬{AB}{iu} sent5: {B}{aa} sent6: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬{AA}{aa} sent7: ({C}{fc} & {A}{fc}) -> ¬{B}{fc} sent8: {AC}{ab}
[ "sent2 & sent5 -> int1: the pyroxylin is not a Changtzu.;" ]
UNKNOWN
[ "sent2 & sent5 -> int1: ¬{A}{aa};" ]
UNKNOWN
2
null
6
0
6
the sprayer does not suffer Vespidae.
¬{B}{fc}
5
[]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = that the pyroxylin is finer and/or it is not a twenty-eight is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the pyroxylin does recommend check. sent2: if the pyroxylin does suffer Vespidae it is not a Changtzu. sent3: if the pyroxylin does not recommend Astaire then that it is septal or it is not a Changtzu or both does not hold. sent4: the funiculus is not a twenty-eight. sent5: the pyroxylin does suffer Vespidae. sent6: the pyroxylin is not finer if that it is not a Changtzu is true. sent7: if the sprayer recommends elaborateness and is a Changtzu it does not suffer Vespidae. sent8: The Vespidae does suffer pyroxylin. ; $proof$ =
__UNKNOWN__
DeductionInstance
if the pyroxylin does suffer Vespidae it is not a Changtzu.
[ "the pyroxylin does suffer Vespidae." ]
[ "if the pyroxylin does suffer Vespidae it is not a Changtzu." ]
if the pyroxylin does suffer Vespidae it is not a Changtzu.
the pyroxylin does suffer Vespidae.
the fact that the packer is not a Liverpudlian and does not reposition puffball does not hold.
sent1: the packer is not Liverpudlian. sent2: the packer is not a Liverpudlian if it suffers wartime. sent3: the packer does suffer wartime and it is tricentenary. sent4: the packer is tricentenary. sent5: something is non-Liverpudlian thing that does not reposition puffball if it does suffer wartime.
¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa})
sent1: ¬{AA}{aa} sent2: {A}{aa} -> ¬{AA}{aa} sent3: ({A}{aa} & {B}{aa}) sent4: {B}{aa} sent5: (x): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x)
[ "sent5 -> int1: if the packer suffers wartime then it is non-Liverpudlian thing that does not reposition puffball.; sent3 -> int2: the packer does suffer wartime.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
[ "sent5 -> int1: {A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}); sent3 -> int2: {A}{aa}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
2
2
3
0
3
null
null
null
[]
null
null
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the packer is not a Liverpudlian and does not reposition puffball does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the packer is not Liverpudlian. sent2: the packer is not a Liverpudlian if it suffers wartime. sent3: the packer does suffer wartime and it is tricentenary. sent4: the packer is tricentenary. sent5: something is non-Liverpudlian thing that does not reposition puffball if it does suffer wartime. ; $proof$ =
sent5 -> int1: if the packer suffers wartime then it is non-Liverpudlian thing that does not reposition puffball.; sent3 -> int2: the packer does suffer wartime.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
DeductionInstance
something is non-Liverpudlian thing that does not reposition puffball if it does suffer wartime.
[ "the packer does suffer wartime and it is tricentenary." ]
[ "something is non-Liverpudlian thing that does not reposition puffball if it does suffer wartime." ]
something is non-Liverpudlian thing that does not reposition puffball if it does suffer wartime.
the packer does suffer wartime and it is tricentenary.
the fact that the pederast is a laryngospasm and it is a pachisi is false.
sent1: if something is a sixth it is a kind of a conciliation. sent2: if that the pederast fraternizes is not wrong that it is a pachisi is not false. sent3: if something is not a laryngospasm the pederast is immunosuppressive. sent4: the pederast does suffer archduchy and/or it is immunosuppressive. sent5: there is something such that it is a pachisi. sent6: if there exists something such that it is not a pachisi the pederast is unsocial. sent7: the pederast is an urge if there exists something such that it does not suffer exanthem. sent8: the pederast is a pachisi if it does suffer archduchy. sent9: the chador is a kind of a pictorial or it is stoppable or both. sent10: the pederast repositions pederast and it is a Australian. sent11: the pederast is a kind of a laryngospasm if it suffers exanthem. sent12: the pederast is a pachisi if it is immunosuppressive. sent13: the firefly is a pachisi. sent14: there is something such that it is not covalent. sent15: if there is something such that the fact that it is not covalent hold the pederast does suffer exanthem.
¬({C}{a} & {D}{a})
sent1: (x): {I}x -> {BE}x sent2: {FR}{a} -> {D}{a} sent3: (x): ¬{C}x -> {E}{a} sent4: ({F}{a} v {E}{a}) sent5: (Ex): {D}x sent6: (x): ¬{D}x -> {FP}{a} sent7: (x): ¬{B}x -> {GU}{a} sent8: {F}{a} -> {D}{a} sent9: ({GL}{dp} v {EC}{dp}) sent10: ({CB}{a} & {DL}{a}) sent11: {B}{a} -> {C}{a} sent12: {E}{a} -> {D}{a} sent13: {D}{hn} sent14: (Ex): ¬{A}x sent15: (x): ¬{A}x -> {B}{a}
[ "sent14 & sent15 -> int1: the pederast does suffer exanthem.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the pederast is a kind of a laryngospasm.; sent4 & sent8 & sent12 -> int3: the pederast is a pachisi.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
[ "sent14 & sent15 -> int1: {B}{a}; int1 & sent11 -> int2: {C}{a}; sent4 & sent8 & sent12 -> int3: {D}{a}; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
3
3
9
0
9
the pederast is a conciliation if it is a kind of a sixth.
{I}{a} -> {BE}{a}
1
[ "sent1 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
PROVED
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the pederast is a laryngospasm and it is a pachisi is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a sixth it is a kind of a conciliation. sent2: if that the pederast fraternizes is not wrong that it is a pachisi is not false. sent3: if something is not a laryngospasm the pederast is immunosuppressive. sent4: the pederast does suffer archduchy and/or it is immunosuppressive. sent5: there is something such that it is a pachisi. sent6: if there exists something such that it is not a pachisi the pederast is unsocial. sent7: the pederast is an urge if there exists something such that it does not suffer exanthem. sent8: the pederast is a pachisi if it does suffer archduchy. sent9: the chador is a kind of a pictorial or it is stoppable or both. sent10: the pederast repositions pederast and it is a Australian. sent11: the pederast is a kind of a laryngospasm if it suffers exanthem. sent12: the pederast is a pachisi if it is immunosuppressive. sent13: the firefly is a pachisi. sent14: there is something such that it is not covalent. sent15: if there is something such that the fact that it is not covalent hold the pederast does suffer exanthem. ; $proof$ =
sent14 & sent15 -> int1: the pederast does suffer exanthem.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the pederast is a kind of a laryngospasm.; sent4 & sent8 & sent12 -> int3: the pederast is a pachisi.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
DeductionInstance
there is something such that it is not covalent.
[ "if there is something such that the fact that it is not covalent hold the pederast does suffer exanthem.", "the pederast is a kind of a laryngospasm if it suffers exanthem.", "the pederast does suffer archduchy and/or it is immunosuppressive.", "the pederast is a pachisi if it does suffer archduchy.", "the pederast is a pachisi if it is immunosuppressive." ]
[ "There is something that is not covalent.", "There is something that isn't covalent.", "There is a thing that is not covalent.", "It is not covalent.", "Something that is not covalent is what it is." ]
There is something that is not covalent.
if there is something such that the fact that it is not covalent hold the pederast does suffer exanthem.
the fact that the pederast is a laryngospasm and it is a pachisi is false.
sent1: if something is a sixth it is a kind of a conciliation. sent2: if that the pederast fraternizes is not wrong that it is a pachisi is not false. sent3: if something is not a laryngospasm the pederast is immunosuppressive. sent4: the pederast does suffer archduchy and/or it is immunosuppressive. sent5: there is something such that it is a pachisi. sent6: if there exists something such that it is not a pachisi the pederast is unsocial. sent7: the pederast is an urge if there exists something such that it does not suffer exanthem. sent8: the pederast is a pachisi if it does suffer archduchy. sent9: the chador is a kind of a pictorial or it is stoppable or both. sent10: the pederast repositions pederast and it is a Australian. sent11: the pederast is a kind of a laryngospasm if it suffers exanthem. sent12: the pederast is a pachisi if it is immunosuppressive. sent13: the firefly is a pachisi. sent14: there is something such that it is not covalent. sent15: if there is something such that the fact that it is not covalent hold the pederast does suffer exanthem.
¬({C}{a} & {D}{a})
sent1: (x): {I}x -> {BE}x sent2: {FR}{a} -> {D}{a} sent3: (x): ¬{C}x -> {E}{a} sent4: ({F}{a} v {E}{a}) sent5: (Ex): {D}x sent6: (x): ¬{D}x -> {FP}{a} sent7: (x): ¬{B}x -> {GU}{a} sent8: {F}{a} -> {D}{a} sent9: ({GL}{dp} v {EC}{dp}) sent10: ({CB}{a} & {DL}{a}) sent11: {B}{a} -> {C}{a} sent12: {E}{a} -> {D}{a} sent13: {D}{hn} sent14: (Ex): ¬{A}x sent15: (x): ¬{A}x -> {B}{a}
[ "sent14 & sent15 -> int1: the pederast does suffer exanthem.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the pederast is a kind of a laryngospasm.; sent4 & sent8 & sent12 -> int3: the pederast is a pachisi.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
[ "sent14 & sent15 -> int1: {B}{a}; int1 & sent11 -> int2: {C}{a}; sent4 & sent8 & sent12 -> int3: {D}{a}; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
3
3
9
0
9
the pederast is a conciliation if it is a kind of a sixth.
{I}{a} -> {BE}{a}
1
[ "sent1 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
PROVED
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the pederast is a laryngospasm and it is a pachisi is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a sixth it is a kind of a conciliation. sent2: if that the pederast fraternizes is not wrong that it is a pachisi is not false. sent3: if something is not a laryngospasm the pederast is immunosuppressive. sent4: the pederast does suffer archduchy and/or it is immunosuppressive. sent5: there is something such that it is a pachisi. sent6: if there exists something such that it is not a pachisi the pederast is unsocial. sent7: the pederast is an urge if there exists something such that it does not suffer exanthem. sent8: the pederast is a pachisi if it does suffer archduchy. sent9: the chador is a kind of a pictorial or it is stoppable or both. sent10: the pederast repositions pederast and it is a Australian. sent11: the pederast is a kind of a laryngospasm if it suffers exanthem. sent12: the pederast is a pachisi if it is immunosuppressive. sent13: the firefly is a pachisi. sent14: there is something such that it is not covalent. sent15: if there is something such that the fact that it is not covalent hold the pederast does suffer exanthem. ; $proof$ =
sent14 & sent15 -> int1: the pederast does suffer exanthem.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the pederast is a kind of a laryngospasm.; sent4 & sent8 & sent12 -> int3: the pederast is a pachisi.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
DeductionInstance
there is something such that it is not covalent.
[ "if there is something such that the fact that it is not covalent hold the pederast does suffer exanthem.", "the pederast is a kind of a laryngospasm if it suffers exanthem.", "the pederast does suffer archduchy and/or it is immunosuppressive.", "the pederast is a pachisi if it does suffer archduchy.", "the pederast is a pachisi if it is immunosuppressive." ]
[ "There is something that is not covalent.", "There is something that isn't covalent.", "There is a thing that is not covalent.", "It is not covalent.", "Something that is not covalent is what it is." ]
There is something that isn't covalent.
the pederast is a kind of a laryngospasm if it suffers exanthem.
the fact that the pederast is a laryngospasm and it is a pachisi is false.
sent1: if something is a sixth it is a kind of a conciliation. sent2: if that the pederast fraternizes is not wrong that it is a pachisi is not false. sent3: if something is not a laryngospasm the pederast is immunosuppressive. sent4: the pederast does suffer archduchy and/or it is immunosuppressive. sent5: there is something such that it is a pachisi. sent6: if there exists something such that it is not a pachisi the pederast is unsocial. sent7: the pederast is an urge if there exists something such that it does not suffer exanthem. sent8: the pederast is a pachisi if it does suffer archduchy. sent9: the chador is a kind of a pictorial or it is stoppable or both. sent10: the pederast repositions pederast and it is a Australian. sent11: the pederast is a kind of a laryngospasm if it suffers exanthem. sent12: the pederast is a pachisi if it is immunosuppressive. sent13: the firefly is a pachisi. sent14: there is something such that it is not covalent. sent15: if there is something such that the fact that it is not covalent hold the pederast does suffer exanthem.
¬({C}{a} & {D}{a})
sent1: (x): {I}x -> {BE}x sent2: {FR}{a} -> {D}{a} sent3: (x): ¬{C}x -> {E}{a} sent4: ({F}{a} v {E}{a}) sent5: (Ex): {D}x sent6: (x): ¬{D}x -> {FP}{a} sent7: (x): ¬{B}x -> {GU}{a} sent8: {F}{a} -> {D}{a} sent9: ({GL}{dp} v {EC}{dp}) sent10: ({CB}{a} & {DL}{a}) sent11: {B}{a} -> {C}{a} sent12: {E}{a} -> {D}{a} sent13: {D}{hn} sent14: (Ex): ¬{A}x sent15: (x): ¬{A}x -> {B}{a}
[ "sent14 & sent15 -> int1: the pederast does suffer exanthem.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the pederast is a kind of a laryngospasm.; sent4 & sent8 & sent12 -> int3: the pederast is a pachisi.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
[ "sent14 & sent15 -> int1: {B}{a}; int1 & sent11 -> int2: {C}{a}; sent4 & sent8 & sent12 -> int3: {D}{a}; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
3
3
9
0
9
the pederast is a conciliation if it is a kind of a sixth.
{I}{a} -> {BE}{a}
1
[ "sent1 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
PROVED
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the pederast is a laryngospasm and it is a pachisi is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a sixth it is a kind of a conciliation. sent2: if that the pederast fraternizes is not wrong that it is a pachisi is not false. sent3: if something is not a laryngospasm the pederast is immunosuppressive. sent4: the pederast does suffer archduchy and/or it is immunosuppressive. sent5: there is something such that it is a pachisi. sent6: if there exists something such that it is not a pachisi the pederast is unsocial. sent7: the pederast is an urge if there exists something such that it does not suffer exanthem. sent8: the pederast is a pachisi if it does suffer archduchy. sent9: the chador is a kind of a pictorial or it is stoppable or both. sent10: the pederast repositions pederast and it is a Australian. sent11: the pederast is a kind of a laryngospasm if it suffers exanthem. sent12: the pederast is a pachisi if it is immunosuppressive. sent13: the firefly is a pachisi. sent14: there is something such that it is not covalent. sent15: if there is something such that the fact that it is not covalent hold the pederast does suffer exanthem. ; $proof$ =
sent14 & sent15 -> int1: the pederast does suffer exanthem.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the pederast is a kind of a laryngospasm.; sent4 & sent8 & sent12 -> int3: the pederast is a pachisi.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
DeductionInstance
there is something such that it is not covalent.
[ "if there is something such that the fact that it is not covalent hold the pederast does suffer exanthem.", "the pederast is a kind of a laryngospasm if it suffers exanthem.", "the pederast does suffer archduchy and/or it is immunosuppressive.", "the pederast is a pachisi if it does suffer archduchy.", "the pederast is a pachisi if it is immunosuppressive." ]
[ "There is something that is not covalent.", "There is something that isn't covalent.", "There is a thing that is not covalent.", "It is not covalent.", "Something that is not covalent is what it is." ]
There is a thing that is not covalent.
the pederast does suffer archduchy and/or it is immunosuppressive.
the fact that the pederast is a laryngospasm and it is a pachisi is false.
sent1: if something is a sixth it is a kind of a conciliation. sent2: if that the pederast fraternizes is not wrong that it is a pachisi is not false. sent3: if something is not a laryngospasm the pederast is immunosuppressive. sent4: the pederast does suffer archduchy and/or it is immunosuppressive. sent5: there is something such that it is a pachisi. sent6: if there exists something such that it is not a pachisi the pederast is unsocial. sent7: the pederast is an urge if there exists something such that it does not suffer exanthem. sent8: the pederast is a pachisi if it does suffer archduchy. sent9: the chador is a kind of a pictorial or it is stoppable or both. sent10: the pederast repositions pederast and it is a Australian. sent11: the pederast is a kind of a laryngospasm if it suffers exanthem. sent12: the pederast is a pachisi if it is immunosuppressive. sent13: the firefly is a pachisi. sent14: there is something such that it is not covalent. sent15: if there is something such that the fact that it is not covalent hold the pederast does suffer exanthem.
¬({C}{a} & {D}{a})
sent1: (x): {I}x -> {BE}x sent2: {FR}{a} -> {D}{a} sent3: (x): ¬{C}x -> {E}{a} sent4: ({F}{a} v {E}{a}) sent5: (Ex): {D}x sent6: (x): ¬{D}x -> {FP}{a} sent7: (x): ¬{B}x -> {GU}{a} sent8: {F}{a} -> {D}{a} sent9: ({GL}{dp} v {EC}{dp}) sent10: ({CB}{a} & {DL}{a}) sent11: {B}{a} -> {C}{a} sent12: {E}{a} -> {D}{a} sent13: {D}{hn} sent14: (Ex): ¬{A}x sent15: (x): ¬{A}x -> {B}{a}
[ "sent14 & sent15 -> int1: the pederast does suffer exanthem.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the pederast is a kind of a laryngospasm.; sent4 & sent8 & sent12 -> int3: the pederast is a pachisi.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
[ "sent14 & sent15 -> int1: {B}{a}; int1 & sent11 -> int2: {C}{a}; sent4 & sent8 & sent12 -> int3: {D}{a}; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
3
3
9
0
9
the pederast is a conciliation if it is a kind of a sixth.
{I}{a} -> {BE}{a}
1
[ "sent1 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
PROVED
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the pederast is a laryngospasm and it is a pachisi is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a sixth it is a kind of a conciliation. sent2: if that the pederast fraternizes is not wrong that it is a pachisi is not false. sent3: if something is not a laryngospasm the pederast is immunosuppressive. sent4: the pederast does suffer archduchy and/or it is immunosuppressive. sent5: there is something such that it is a pachisi. sent6: if there exists something such that it is not a pachisi the pederast is unsocial. sent7: the pederast is an urge if there exists something such that it does not suffer exanthem. sent8: the pederast is a pachisi if it does suffer archduchy. sent9: the chador is a kind of a pictorial or it is stoppable or both. sent10: the pederast repositions pederast and it is a Australian. sent11: the pederast is a kind of a laryngospasm if it suffers exanthem. sent12: the pederast is a pachisi if it is immunosuppressive. sent13: the firefly is a pachisi. sent14: there is something such that it is not covalent. sent15: if there is something such that the fact that it is not covalent hold the pederast does suffer exanthem. ; $proof$ =
sent14 & sent15 -> int1: the pederast does suffer exanthem.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the pederast is a kind of a laryngospasm.; sent4 & sent8 & sent12 -> int3: the pederast is a pachisi.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
DeductionInstance
there is something such that it is not covalent.
[ "if there is something such that the fact that it is not covalent hold the pederast does suffer exanthem.", "the pederast is a kind of a laryngospasm if it suffers exanthem.", "the pederast does suffer archduchy and/or it is immunosuppressive.", "the pederast is a pachisi if it does suffer archduchy.", "the pederast is a pachisi if it is immunosuppressive." ]
[ "There is something that is not covalent.", "There is something that isn't covalent.", "There is a thing that is not covalent.", "It is not covalent.", "Something that is not covalent is what it is." ]
It is not covalent.
the pederast is a pachisi if it does suffer archduchy.
the fact that the pederast is a laryngospasm and it is a pachisi is false.
sent1: if something is a sixth it is a kind of a conciliation. sent2: if that the pederast fraternizes is not wrong that it is a pachisi is not false. sent3: if something is not a laryngospasm the pederast is immunosuppressive. sent4: the pederast does suffer archduchy and/or it is immunosuppressive. sent5: there is something such that it is a pachisi. sent6: if there exists something such that it is not a pachisi the pederast is unsocial. sent7: the pederast is an urge if there exists something such that it does not suffer exanthem. sent8: the pederast is a pachisi if it does suffer archduchy. sent9: the chador is a kind of a pictorial or it is stoppable or both. sent10: the pederast repositions pederast and it is a Australian. sent11: the pederast is a kind of a laryngospasm if it suffers exanthem. sent12: the pederast is a pachisi if it is immunosuppressive. sent13: the firefly is a pachisi. sent14: there is something such that it is not covalent. sent15: if there is something such that the fact that it is not covalent hold the pederast does suffer exanthem.
¬({C}{a} & {D}{a})
sent1: (x): {I}x -> {BE}x sent2: {FR}{a} -> {D}{a} sent3: (x): ¬{C}x -> {E}{a} sent4: ({F}{a} v {E}{a}) sent5: (Ex): {D}x sent6: (x): ¬{D}x -> {FP}{a} sent7: (x): ¬{B}x -> {GU}{a} sent8: {F}{a} -> {D}{a} sent9: ({GL}{dp} v {EC}{dp}) sent10: ({CB}{a} & {DL}{a}) sent11: {B}{a} -> {C}{a} sent12: {E}{a} -> {D}{a} sent13: {D}{hn} sent14: (Ex): ¬{A}x sent15: (x): ¬{A}x -> {B}{a}
[ "sent14 & sent15 -> int1: the pederast does suffer exanthem.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the pederast is a kind of a laryngospasm.; sent4 & sent8 & sent12 -> int3: the pederast is a pachisi.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
[ "sent14 & sent15 -> int1: {B}{a}; int1 & sent11 -> int2: {C}{a}; sent4 & sent8 & sent12 -> int3: {D}{a}; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
3
3
9
0
9
the pederast is a conciliation if it is a kind of a sixth.
{I}{a} -> {BE}{a}
1
[ "sent1 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
PROVED
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the pederast is a laryngospasm and it is a pachisi is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a sixth it is a kind of a conciliation. sent2: if that the pederast fraternizes is not wrong that it is a pachisi is not false. sent3: if something is not a laryngospasm the pederast is immunosuppressive. sent4: the pederast does suffer archduchy and/or it is immunosuppressive. sent5: there is something such that it is a pachisi. sent6: if there exists something such that it is not a pachisi the pederast is unsocial. sent7: the pederast is an urge if there exists something such that it does not suffer exanthem. sent8: the pederast is a pachisi if it does suffer archduchy. sent9: the chador is a kind of a pictorial or it is stoppable or both. sent10: the pederast repositions pederast and it is a Australian. sent11: the pederast is a kind of a laryngospasm if it suffers exanthem. sent12: the pederast is a pachisi if it is immunosuppressive. sent13: the firefly is a pachisi. sent14: there is something such that it is not covalent. sent15: if there is something such that the fact that it is not covalent hold the pederast does suffer exanthem. ; $proof$ =
sent14 & sent15 -> int1: the pederast does suffer exanthem.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the pederast is a kind of a laryngospasm.; sent4 & sent8 & sent12 -> int3: the pederast is a pachisi.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
DeductionInstance
there is something such that it is not covalent.
[ "if there is something such that the fact that it is not covalent hold the pederast does suffer exanthem.", "the pederast is a kind of a laryngospasm if it suffers exanthem.", "the pederast does suffer archduchy and/or it is immunosuppressive.", "the pederast is a pachisi if it does suffer archduchy.", "the pederast is a pachisi if it is immunosuppressive." ]
[ "There is something that is not covalent.", "There is something that isn't covalent.", "There is a thing that is not covalent.", "It is not covalent.", "Something that is not covalent is what it is." ]
Something that is not covalent is what it is.
the pederast is a pachisi if it is immunosuppressive.
the chylomicron is a Arabian and it is an adenine.
sent1: if there exists something such that that it does not recommend Alecto and is a myoclonus is not true then the stopover recommend Alecto. sent2: if the autacoid does not radiate then it is not human and it recommends stopover. sent3: if the pessimist is not a kind of an adenine the chylomicron is a kind of a Arabian. sent4: that the pessimist does not recommend Alecto but it is a myoclonus does not hold if the chylomicron is a grosgrain. sent5: if the stopover is not a Arabian then the chylomicron recommends plunderer and it is a Arabian. sent6: the chylomicron is Arabian. sent7: that if the fact that something is an adenine and is a Arabian is not true it is not a kind of an adenine hold. sent8: that the waders is an adenine and it is a Arabian does not hold if the plunderer does not recommend stopover. sent9: the pessimist is not a kind of an adenine if the fact that the stopover is not a kind of a myoclonus or does recommend plunderer or both does not hold. sent10: if there is something such that it is a grosgrain that the stopover is not a kind of a myoclonus or does recommend plunderer or both is not true. sent11: if the fact that the stopover is a myoclonus or it recommends plunderer or both does not hold then the pessimist is not a kind of an adenine. sent12: if something is a grosgrain the stopover is a myoclonus. sent13: the autacoid does not radiate. sent14: the chylomicron is Arabian thing that is a kind of an adenine if the pessimist is not a kind of an adenine. sent15: the plunderer does not recommend stopover if the autacoid is not human but it recommend stopover.
({F}{c} & {D}{c})
sent1: (x): ¬(¬{HB}x & {B}x) -> {HB}{a} sent2: ¬{G}{f} -> (¬{H}{f} & {E}{f}) sent3: ¬{D}{b} -> {F}{c} sent4: {A}{c} -> ¬(¬{HB}{b} & {B}{b}) sent5: ¬{F}{a} -> ({C}{c} & {F}{c}) sent6: {F}{c} sent7: (x): ¬({D}x & {F}x) -> ¬{D}x sent8: ¬{E}{e} -> ¬({D}{d} & {F}{d}) sent9: ¬(¬{B}{a} v {C}{a}) -> ¬{D}{b} sent10: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{B}{a} v {C}{a}) sent11: ¬({B}{a} v {C}{a}) -> ¬{D}{b} sent12: (x): {A}x -> {B}{a} sent13: ¬{G}{f} sent14: ¬{D}{b} -> ({F}{c} & {D}{c}) sent15: (¬{H}{f} & {E}{f}) -> ¬{E}{e}
[]
UNKNOWN
[]
UNKNOWN
3
null
12
0
12
something does recommend Alecto.
(Ex): {HB}x
11
[ "sent7 -> int1: if the fact that the waders is a kind of an adenine and it is a kind of a Arabian is not correct it is not a kind of an adenine.; sent2 & sent13 -> int2: the autacoid is not human and does recommend stopover.; sent15 & int2 -> int3: the plunderer does not recommend stopover.; sent8 & int3 -> int4: that the waders is an adenine and it is a kind of a Arabian does not hold.; int1 & int4 -> int5: the waders is not a kind of an adenine.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that it is not an adenine.;" ]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the chylomicron is a Arabian and it is an adenine. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that that it does not recommend Alecto and is a myoclonus is not true then the stopover recommend Alecto. sent2: if the autacoid does not radiate then it is not human and it recommends stopover. sent3: if the pessimist is not a kind of an adenine the chylomicron is a kind of a Arabian. sent4: that the pessimist does not recommend Alecto but it is a myoclonus does not hold if the chylomicron is a grosgrain. sent5: if the stopover is not a Arabian then the chylomicron recommends plunderer and it is a Arabian. sent6: the chylomicron is Arabian. sent7: that if the fact that something is an adenine and is a Arabian is not true it is not a kind of an adenine hold. sent8: that the waders is an adenine and it is a Arabian does not hold if the plunderer does not recommend stopover. sent9: the pessimist is not a kind of an adenine if the fact that the stopover is not a kind of a myoclonus or does recommend plunderer or both does not hold. sent10: if there is something such that it is a grosgrain that the stopover is not a kind of a myoclonus or does recommend plunderer or both is not true. sent11: if the fact that the stopover is a myoclonus or it recommends plunderer or both does not hold then the pessimist is not a kind of an adenine. sent12: if something is a grosgrain the stopover is a myoclonus. sent13: the autacoid does not radiate. sent14: the chylomicron is Arabian thing that is a kind of an adenine if the pessimist is not a kind of an adenine. sent15: the plunderer does not recommend stopover if the autacoid is not human but it recommend stopover. ; $proof$ =
__UNKNOWN__
DeductionInstance
if there is something such that it is a grosgrain that the stopover is not a kind of a myoclonus or does recommend plunderer or both is not true.
[ "if something is a grosgrain the stopover is a myoclonus." ]
[ "if there is something such that it is a grosgrain that the stopover is not a kind of a myoclonus or does recommend plunderer or both is not true." ]
if there is something such that it is a grosgrain that the stopover is not a kind of a myoclonus or does recommend plunderer or both is not true.
if something is a grosgrain the stopover is a myoclonus.
the grounding does not occur and the arthralgicness does not occur.
sent1: the fact that the grounding does not occur and the arthralgicness does not occur if the suffering polypropylene does not occur hold. sent2: if the adventitialness does not occur then the achlorhydricness does not occur. sent3: if the fact that the Circumcision does not occur is true the homonymicness does not occur. sent4: the repositioning mojo occurs. sent5: both the remarriage and the non-floriculturalness happens. sent6: the repositioning yokel does not occur and the destructing does not occur. sent7: the unapologeticness occurs and the suffering polypropylene does not occur. sent8: the light-dutiness does not occur and the scrutiny does not occur. sent9: the repositioning dronabinol does not occur. sent10: the corroding stob does not occur.
(¬{C} & ¬{D})
sent1: ¬{B} -> (¬{C} & ¬{D}) sent2: ¬{CD} -> ¬{FP} sent3: ¬{DQ} -> ¬{CI} sent4: {EK} sent5: ({FG} & ¬{BN}) sent6: (¬{EC} & ¬{AE}) sent7: ({A} & ¬{B}) sent8: (¬{CO} & ¬{IQ}) sent9: ¬{IR} sent10: ¬{AG}
[ "sent7 -> int1: the fact that the suffering polypropylene does not occur is right.; sent1 & int1 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
[ "sent7 -> int1: ¬{B}; sent1 & int1 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
2
2
8
0
8
null
null
null
[]
null
null
$hypothesis$ = the grounding does not occur and the arthralgicness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the grounding does not occur and the arthralgicness does not occur if the suffering polypropylene does not occur hold. sent2: if the adventitialness does not occur then the achlorhydricness does not occur. sent3: if the fact that the Circumcision does not occur is true the homonymicness does not occur. sent4: the repositioning mojo occurs. sent5: both the remarriage and the non-floriculturalness happens. sent6: the repositioning yokel does not occur and the destructing does not occur. sent7: the unapologeticness occurs and the suffering polypropylene does not occur. sent8: the light-dutiness does not occur and the scrutiny does not occur. sent9: the repositioning dronabinol does not occur. sent10: the corroding stob does not occur. ; $proof$ =
sent7 -> int1: the fact that the suffering polypropylene does not occur is right.; sent1 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
DeductionInstance
the unapologeticness occurs and the suffering polypropylene does not occur.
[ "the fact that the grounding does not occur and the arthralgicness does not occur if the suffering polypropylene does not occur hold." ]
[ "the unapologeticness occurs and the suffering polypropylene does not occur." ]
the unapologeticness occurs and the suffering polypropylene does not occur.
the fact that the grounding does not occur and the arthralgicness does not occur if the suffering polypropylene does not occur hold.
the necessity is bardic.
sent1: the regnellidium is postpositive and it is a forgery if the fact that the khamsin does not disoblige is correct. sent2: something does suffer sculptress and it is postpositive if it is not bardic. sent3: if the teleologist is piscine then that it is postganglionic and it does not disoblige is correct. sent4: if the teleologist is a kind of postganglionic thing that does not disoblige then it is not bardic. sent5: that the necessity is jawless hold. sent6: the villain is postpositive. sent7: the talapoin does suffer fungus and it is jawless. sent8: the necessity is postpositive. sent9: if something is jawless and is postpositive then it is not bardic. sent10: if that either the rotisserie is piscine or it is postganglionic or both is not correct the khamsin does not disoblige.
{C}{a}
sent1: ¬{E}{c} -> ({B}{b} & {D}{b}) sent2: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({IH}x & {B}x) sent3: {G}{i} -> ({F}{i} & ¬{E}{i}) sent4: ({F}{i} & ¬{E}{i}) -> ¬{C}{i} sent5: {A}{a} sent6: {B}{cb} sent7: ({GE}{dp} & {A}{dp}) sent8: {B}{a} sent9: (x): ({A}x & {B}x) -> ¬{C}x sent10: ¬({G}{d} v {F}{d}) -> ¬{E}{c}
[ "sent5 & sent8 -> int1: the necessity is jawless and postpositive.; sent9 -> int2: the necessity is not bardic if it is both jawless and postpositive.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
[ "sent5 & sent8 -> int1: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}); sent9 -> int2: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{C}{a}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
2
2
7
0
7
the necessity is bardic.
{C}{a}
7
[]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the necessity is bardic. ; $context$ = sent1: the regnellidium is postpositive and it is a forgery if the fact that the khamsin does not disoblige is correct. sent2: something does suffer sculptress and it is postpositive if it is not bardic. sent3: if the teleologist is piscine then that it is postganglionic and it does not disoblige is correct. sent4: if the teleologist is a kind of postganglionic thing that does not disoblige then it is not bardic. sent5: that the necessity is jawless hold. sent6: the villain is postpositive. sent7: the talapoin does suffer fungus and it is jawless. sent8: the necessity is postpositive. sent9: if something is jawless and is postpositive then it is not bardic. sent10: if that either the rotisserie is piscine or it is postganglionic or both is not correct the khamsin does not disoblige. ; $proof$ =
sent5 & sent8 -> int1: the necessity is jawless and postpositive.; sent9 -> int2: the necessity is not bardic if it is both jawless and postpositive.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
DeductionInstance
that the necessity is jawless hold.
[ "the necessity is postpositive.", "if something is jawless and is postpositive then it is not bardic." ]
[ "The necessity is jawless hold.", "The necessity is jawless." ]
The necessity is jawless hold.
the necessity is postpositive.
the necessity is bardic.
sent1: the regnellidium is postpositive and it is a forgery if the fact that the khamsin does not disoblige is correct. sent2: something does suffer sculptress and it is postpositive if it is not bardic. sent3: if the teleologist is piscine then that it is postganglionic and it does not disoblige is correct. sent4: if the teleologist is a kind of postganglionic thing that does not disoblige then it is not bardic. sent5: that the necessity is jawless hold. sent6: the villain is postpositive. sent7: the talapoin does suffer fungus and it is jawless. sent8: the necessity is postpositive. sent9: if something is jawless and is postpositive then it is not bardic. sent10: if that either the rotisserie is piscine or it is postganglionic or both is not correct the khamsin does not disoblige.
{C}{a}
sent1: ¬{E}{c} -> ({B}{b} & {D}{b}) sent2: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({IH}x & {B}x) sent3: {G}{i} -> ({F}{i} & ¬{E}{i}) sent4: ({F}{i} & ¬{E}{i}) -> ¬{C}{i} sent5: {A}{a} sent6: {B}{cb} sent7: ({GE}{dp} & {A}{dp}) sent8: {B}{a} sent9: (x): ({A}x & {B}x) -> ¬{C}x sent10: ¬({G}{d} v {F}{d}) -> ¬{E}{c}
[ "sent5 & sent8 -> int1: the necessity is jawless and postpositive.; sent9 -> int2: the necessity is not bardic if it is both jawless and postpositive.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
[ "sent5 & sent8 -> int1: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}); sent9 -> int2: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{C}{a}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
2
2
7
0
7
the necessity is bardic.
{C}{a}
7
[]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the necessity is bardic. ; $context$ = sent1: the regnellidium is postpositive and it is a forgery if the fact that the khamsin does not disoblige is correct. sent2: something does suffer sculptress and it is postpositive if it is not bardic. sent3: if the teleologist is piscine then that it is postganglionic and it does not disoblige is correct. sent4: if the teleologist is a kind of postganglionic thing that does not disoblige then it is not bardic. sent5: that the necessity is jawless hold. sent6: the villain is postpositive. sent7: the talapoin does suffer fungus and it is jawless. sent8: the necessity is postpositive. sent9: if something is jawless and is postpositive then it is not bardic. sent10: if that either the rotisserie is piscine or it is postganglionic or both is not correct the khamsin does not disoblige. ; $proof$ =
sent5 & sent8 -> int1: the necessity is jawless and postpositive.; sent9 -> int2: the necessity is not bardic if it is both jawless and postpositive.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
DeductionInstance
that the necessity is jawless hold.
[ "the necessity is postpositive.", "if something is jawless and is postpositive then it is not bardic." ]
[ "The necessity is jawless hold.", "The necessity is jawless." ]
The necessity is jawless.
if something is jawless and is postpositive then it is not bardic.
the ash is not a kind of a seventeen and it does not recommend Gent.
sent1: the Acular is a kind of a airstream. sent2: the blastocyte is not a nap if the ash does recommend Gent and is a kind of a seventeen. sent3: the blastocyte is a kind of a seventeen. sent4: something that feminizes is a kind of non-precocious thing that is a nap. sent5: something is not a kind of a airstream if it is non-precocious thing that does nap. sent6: the Acular does reposition blastocyte. sent7: the Acular is not a seventeen if the ash is a nap and a airstream. sent8: the blastocyte does nap. sent9: the ash is not a seventeen. sent10: if something is not a airstream then the fact that it is not a seventeen and does not recommend Gent is false. sent11: the harpulla is not a kind of a nap. sent12: if that the Acular does not surrender and it does not feminize is wrong then the ash feminize. sent13: the Acular is a nap. sent14: the ash is not a seventeen if the blastocyte does not recommend Gent. sent15: the ash is not a seventeen and does not recommend Gent if the blastocyte does not recommend Gent. sent16: the ash is not a kind of a seventeen if the blastocyte is a kind of a airstream and it recommends Gent. sent17: the blastocyte is slippery and a Landau. sent18: the blastocyte does mingle and it is a stammer.
(¬{E}{c} & ¬{C}{c})
sent1: {A}{a} sent2: ({C}{c} & {E}{c}) -> ¬{B}{b} sent3: {E}{b} sent4: (x): {F}x -> (¬{D}x & {B}x) sent5: (x): (¬{D}x & {B}x) -> ¬{A}x sent6: {ER}{a} sent7: ({B}{c} & {A}{c}) -> ¬{E}{a} sent8: {B}{b} sent9: ¬{E}{c} sent10: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{E}x & ¬{C}x) sent11: ¬{B}{gc} sent12: ¬(¬{G}{a} & ¬{F}{a}) -> {F}{c} sent13: {B}{a} sent14: ¬{C}{b} -> ¬{E}{c} sent15: ¬{C}{b} -> (¬{E}{c} & ¬{C}{c}) sent16: ({A}{b} & {C}{b}) -> ¬{E}{c} sent17: ({CO}{b} & {HJ}{b}) sent18: ({BI}{b} & {FT}{b})
[ "sent1 & sent13 -> int1: the Acular is a kind of a airstream that is a nap.;" ]
UNKNOWN
[ "sent1 & sent13 -> int1: ({A}{a} & {B}{a});" ]
UNKNOWN
3
null
15
0
15
the fact that the ash is not a seventeen and it does not recommend Gent is not true.
¬(¬{E}{c} & ¬{C}{c})
6
[ "sent10 -> int2: that that that the ash is not the seventeen and does not recommend Gent is not false does not hold if the ash is not a kind of a airstream is not incorrect.; sent5 -> int3: the ash is not a airstream if it is both not precocious and a nap.; sent4 -> int4: the ash is not precocious and naps if it does feminize.;" ]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the ash is not a kind of a seventeen and it does not recommend Gent. ; $context$ = sent1: the Acular is a kind of a airstream. sent2: the blastocyte is not a nap if the ash does recommend Gent and is a kind of a seventeen. sent3: the blastocyte is a kind of a seventeen. sent4: something that feminizes is a kind of non-precocious thing that is a nap. sent5: something is not a kind of a airstream if it is non-precocious thing that does nap. sent6: the Acular does reposition blastocyte. sent7: the Acular is not a seventeen if the ash is a nap and a airstream. sent8: the blastocyte does nap. sent9: the ash is not a seventeen. sent10: if something is not a airstream then the fact that it is not a seventeen and does not recommend Gent is false. sent11: the harpulla is not a kind of a nap. sent12: if that the Acular does not surrender and it does not feminize is wrong then the ash feminize. sent13: the Acular is a nap. sent14: the ash is not a seventeen if the blastocyte does not recommend Gent. sent15: the ash is not a seventeen and does not recommend Gent if the blastocyte does not recommend Gent. sent16: the ash is not a kind of a seventeen if the blastocyte is a kind of a airstream and it recommends Gent. sent17: the blastocyte is slippery and a Landau. sent18: the blastocyte does mingle and it is a stammer. ; $proof$ =
__UNKNOWN__
DeductionInstance
the Acular is a kind of a airstream.
[ "the Acular is a nap." ]
[ "the Acular is a kind of a airstream." ]
the Acular is a kind of a airstream.
the Acular is a nap.
something is a boatyard and it is hexadecimal.
sent1: the meltwater is a kind of a transient. sent2: if there exists something such that it does reposition Gossypium then the fact that the bedstraw suffers hadron is not incorrect. sent3: there exists something such that it is a kind of a boatyard. sent4: the laptop repositions Gossypium. sent5: the fact that something is not a kind of a transient if the fact that it is a kind of a transient that is not a shame is not correct is right. sent6: the meltwater is a transient and a boatyard. sent7: the gametophyte is a kind of a boatyard if the meltwater is not a boatyard. sent8: the fact that the mastiff is karyokinetic is not incorrect. sent9: that the meltwater does suffer hadron hold. sent10: something is hexadecimal. sent11: if the bedstraw is hexadecimal the meltwater is not a boatyard. sent12: the twerp is hexadecimal. sent13: the meltwater suffers hadron and it is hexadecimal. sent14: if the fact that something is not a transient is not false either it is hexadecimal or it is a boatyard or both. sent15: the mastiff is not a kind of a tomatillo and it is not a mesohippus if it is karyokinetic. sent16: the meltwater is not a boatyard if the bedstraw is a kind of a boatyard. sent17: if something is not a kind of a tomatillo then the gametophyte does recommend carabiner.
(Ex): ({B}x & {C}x)
sent1: {A}{a} sent2: (x): {G}x -> {D}{b} sent3: (Ex): {B}x sent4: {G}{d} sent5: (x): ¬({A}x & ¬{E}x) -> ¬{A}x sent6: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) sent7: ¬{B}{a} -> {B}{gi} sent8: {I}{c} sent9: {D}{a} sent10: (Ex): {C}x sent11: {C}{b} -> ¬{B}{a} sent12: {C}{at} sent13: ({D}{a} & {C}{a}) sent14: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({C}x v {B}x) sent15: {I}{c} -> (¬{F}{c} & ¬{H}{c}) sent16: {B}{b} -> ¬{B}{a} sent17: (x): ¬{F}x -> {CQ}{gi}
[ "sent6 -> int1: that the meltwater is a boatyard hold.; sent13 -> int2: the meltwater is not non-hexadecimal.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the meltwater is a boatyard and it is hexadecimal.; int3 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
[ "sent6 -> int1: {B}{a}; sent13 -> int2: {C}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ({B}{a} & {C}{a}); int3 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
3
3
15
0
15
the gametophyte is a boatyard and it recommends carabiner.
({B}{gi} & {CQ}{gi})
8
[ "sent14 -> int4: the fact that if the bedstraw is not the transient then the bedstraw is hexadecimal and/or it is a boatyard is correct.; sent5 -> int5: if the fact that the bedstraw is a transient and does not shame is false it is not a transient.; sent4 -> int6: there is something such that it repositions Gossypium.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: the bedstraw does suffer hadron.; sent15 & sent8 -> int8: the mastiff is not a tomatillo and not a mesohippus.; int8 -> int9: the mastiff is not a tomatillo.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that it is not a tomatillo.; int10 & sent17 -> int11: the gametophyte recommends carabiner.;" ]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = something is a boatyard and it is hexadecimal. ; $context$ = sent1: the meltwater is a kind of a transient. sent2: if there exists something such that it does reposition Gossypium then the fact that the bedstraw suffers hadron is not incorrect. sent3: there exists something such that it is a kind of a boatyard. sent4: the laptop repositions Gossypium. sent5: the fact that something is not a kind of a transient if the fact that it is a kind of a transient that is not a shame is not correct is right. sent6: the meltwater is a transient and a boatyard. sent7: the gametophyte is a kind of a boatyard if the meltwater is not a boatyard. sent8: the fact that the mastiff is karyokinetic is not incorrect. sent9: that the meltwater does suffer hadron hold. sent10: something is hexadecimal. sent11: if the bedstraw is hexadecimal the meltwater is not a boatyard. sent12: the twerp is hexadecimal. sent13: the meltwater suffers hadron and it is hexadecimal. sent14: if the fact that something is not a transient is not false either it is hexadecimal or it is a boatyard or both. sent15: the mastiff is not a kind of a tomatillo and it is not a mesohippus if it is karyokinetic. sent16: the meltwater is not a boatyard if the bedstraw is a kind of a boatyard. sent17: if something is not a kind of a tomatillo then the gametophyte does recommend carabiner. ; $proof$ =
sent6 -> int1: that the meltwater is a boatyard hold.; sent13 -> int2: the meltwater is not non-hexadecimal.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the meltwater is a boatyard and it is hexadecimal.; int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
DeductionInstance
the meltwater is a transient and a boatyard.
[ "the meltwater suffers hadron and it is hexadecimal." ]
[ "the meltwater is a transient and a boatyard." ]
the meltwater is a transient and a boatyard.
the meltwater suffers hadron and it is hexadecimal.
that the oligarch does suffer foster-child but it is not a trolleybus is false.
sent1: if the panelist is a steep then the oligarch suffers foster-child and is not a kind of a trolleybus. sent2: if the panelist does steep the oligarch suffers foster-child. sent3: the oligarch does suffer foster-child. sent4: if the pledgee does localize then the fact that it does recommend Aberdare is correct. sent5: if something is alkahestic then that it does not recommend Hilo and it does not wrangle is wrong. sent6: if the panelist is not a caranday the fact that that it does not recommend walkover and it interrelates is right is wrong. sent7: if the tiramisu does recommend Hilo it steeps and is not a Camptosorus. sent8: the panelist is not a caranday. sent9: that the panelist does recommend walkover and it does interrelate is not right. sent10: the pledgee localizes. sent11: the fragmentation is not non-alkahestic if the plywood is not earthly. sent12: the panelist is a kind of a steep if it recommends walkover. sent13: if the pledgee does recommend Aberdare that the fact that the Wolf is unpopular and/or not parietal does not hold is not false. sent14: if the folderal does recommend Hilo the tiramisu recommend Hilo. sent15: the plywood is not earthly if there exists something such that the fact that it is unpopular or it is not parietal or both is wrong. sent16: that the folderal does recommend Hilo is not false if that the lighter does not recommend Hilo is not false. sent17: the lighter does not recommend Hilo if that that the fragmentation does not recommend Hilo and it does not wrangle is correct does not hold. sent18: something steeps if it recommends walkover. sent19: something does steep if the fact that it does not recommend walkover and it does interrelate is wrong.
¬({C}{b} & ¬{D}{b})
sent1: {B}{a} -> ({C}{b} & ¬{D}{b}) sent2: {B}{a} -> {C}{b} sent3: {C}{b} sent4: {M}{i} -> {L}{i} sent5: (x): {G}x -> ¬(¬{F}x & ¬{H}x) sent6: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent7: {F}{c} -> ({B}{c} & ¬{E}{c}) sent8: ¬{A}{a} sent9: ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent10: {M}{i} sent11: ¬{I}{g} -> {G}{f} sent12: {AA}{a} -> {B}{a} sent13: {L}{i} -> ¬({J}{h} v ¬{K}{h}) sent14: {F}{d} -> {F}{c} sent15: (x): ¬({J}x v ¬{K}x) -> ¬{I}{g} sent16: ¬{F}{e} -> {F}{d} sent17: ¬(¬{F}{f} & ¬{H}{f}) -> ¬{F}{e} sent18: (x): {AA}x -> {B}x sent19: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x
[ "sent6 & sent8 -> int1: that the panelist does not recommend walkover and does interrelate is incorrect.; sent19 -> int2: if the fact that the panelist does not recommend walkover but it does interrelate is not right then it is a steep.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the panelist is a kind of a steep.; int3 & sent1 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
[ "sent6 & sent8 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}); sent19 -> int2: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: {B}{a}; int3 & sent1 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
3
3
15
0
15
that the oligarch suffers foster-child but it is not a trolleybus is not right.
¬({C}{b} & ¬{D}{b})
14
[ "sent5 -> int4: the fact that the fragmentation does not recommend Hilo and does not wrangle does not hold if the fact that it is alkahestic is not wrong.; sent4 & sent10 -> int5: the pledgee does recommend Aberdare.; sent13 & int5 -> int6: that the Wolf is either not popular or non-parietal or both does not hold.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that that the fact that it is unpopular and/or it is not parietal is not wrong is not true.; int7 & sent15 -> int8: the plywood is not earthly.; sent11 & int8 -> int9: that the fragmentation is alkahestic hold.; int4 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the fragmentation does not recommend Hilo and it does not wrangle does not hold.; sent17 & int10 -> int11: the lighter does not recommend Hilo.; sent16 & int11 -> int12: the folderal does recommend Hilo.; sent14 & int12 -> int13: the tiramisu recommends Hilo.; sent7 & int13 -> int14: the tiramisu is a steep but not a Camptosorus.; int14 -> int15: something is steep thing that is not a Camptosorus.;" ]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = that the oligarch does suffer foster-child but it is not a trolleybus is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the panelist is a steep then the oligarch suffers foster-child and is not a kind of a trolleybus. sent2: if the panelist does steep the oligarch suffers foster-child. sent3: the oligarch does suffer foster-child. sent4: if the pledgee does localize then the fact that it does recommend Aberdare is correct. sent5: if something is alkahestic then that it does not recommend Hilo and it does not wrangle is wrong. sent6: if the panelist is not a caranday the fact that that it does not recommend walkover and it interrelates is right is wrong. sent7: if the tiramisu does recommend Hilo it steeps and is not a Camptosorus. sent8: the panelist is not a caranday. sent9: that the panelist does recommend walkover and it does interrelate is not right. sent10: the pledgee localizes. sent11: the fragmentation is not non-alkahestic if the plywood is not earthly. sent12: the panelist is a kind of a steep if it recommends walkover. sent13: if the pledgee does recommend Aberdare that the fact that the Wolf is unpopular and/or not parietal does not hold is not false. sent14: if the folderal does recommend Hilo the tiramisu recommend Hilo. sent15: the plywood is not earthly if there exists something such that the fact that it is unpopular or it is not parietal or both is wrong. sent16: that the folderal does recommend Hilo is not false if that the lighter does not recommend Hilo is not false. sent17: the lighter does not recommend Hilo if that that the fragmentation does not recommend Hilo and it does not wrangle is correct does not hold. sent18: something steeps if it recommends walkover. sent19: something does steep if the fact that it does not recommend walkover and it does interrelate is wrong. ; $proof$ =
sent6 & sent8 -> int1: that the panelist does not recommend walkover and does interrelate is incorrect.; sent19 -> int2: if the fact that the panelist does not recommend walkover but it does interrelate is not right then it is a steep.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the panelist is a kind of a steep.; int3 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
DeductionInstance
if the panelist is not a caranday the fact that that it does not recommend walkover and it interrelates is right is wrong.
[ "the panelist is not a caranday.", "something does steep if the fact that it does not recommend walkover and it does interrelate is wrong.", "if the panelist is a steep then the oligarch suffers foster-child and is not a kind of a trolleybus." ]
[ "If the panelist is not a caranday, the fact that it does not recommend walkover is wrong.", "The fact that the panelist does not recommend walkover is wrong.", "The fact that it does not recommend walkover is wrong if the panelist is not a caranday." ]
If the panelist is not a caranday, the fact that it does not recommend walkover is wrong.
the panelist is not a caranday.
that the oligarch does suffer foster-child but it is not a trolleybus is false.
sent1: if the panelist is a steep then the oligarch suffers foster-child and is not a kind of a trolleybus. sent2: if the panelist does steep the oligarch suffers foster-child. sent3: the oligarch does suffer foster-child. sent4: if the pledgee does localize then the fact that it does recommend Aberdare is correct. sent5: if something is alkahestic then that it does not recommend Hilo and it does not wrangle is wrong. sent6: if the panelist is not a caranday the fact that that it does not recommend walkover and it interrelates is right is wrong. sent7: if the tiramisu does recommend Hilo it steeps and is not a Camptosorus. sent8: the panelist is not a caranday. sent9: that the panelist does recommend walkover and it does interrelate is not right. sent10: the pledgee localizes. sent11: the fragmentation is not non-alkahestic if the plywood is not earthly. sent12: the panelist is a kind of a steep if it recommends walkover. sent13: if the pledgee does recommend Aberdare that the fact that the Wolf is unpopular and/or not parietal does not hold is not false. sent14: if the folderal does recommend Hilo the tiramisu recommend Hilo. sent15: the plywood is not earthly if there exists something such that the fact that it is unpopular or it is not parietal or both is wrong. sent16: that the folderal does recommend Hilo is not false if that the lighter does not recommend Hilo is not false. sent17: the lighter does not recommend Hilo if that that the fragmentation does not recommend Hilo and it does not wrangle is correct does not hold. sent18: something steeps if it recommends walkover. sent19: something does steep if the fact that it does not recommend walkover and it does interrelate is wrong.
¬({C}{b} & ¬{D}{b})
sent1: {B}{a} -> ({C}{b} & ¬{D}{b}) sent2: {B}{a} -> {C}{b} sent3: {C}{b} sent4: {M}{i} -> {L}{i} sent5: (x): {G}x -> ¬(¬{F}x & ¬{H}x) sent6: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent7: {F}{c} -> ({B}{c} & ¬{E}{c}) sent8: ¬{A}{a} sent9: ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent10: {M}{i} sent11: ¬{I}{g} -> {G}{f} sent12: {AA}{a} -> {B}{a} sent13: {L}{i} -> ¬({J}{h} v ¬{K}{h}) sent14: {F}{d} -> {F}{c} sent15: (x): ¬({J}x v ¬{K}x) -> ¬{I}{g} sent16: ¬{F}{e} -> {F}{d} sent17: ¬(¬{F}{f} & ¬{H}{f}) -> ¬{F}{e} sent18: (x): {AA}x -> {B}x sent19: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x
[ "sent6 & sent8 -> int1: that the panelist does not recommend walkover and does interrelate is incorrect.; sent19 -> int2: if the fact that the panelist does not recommend walkover but it does interrelate is not right then it is a steep.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the panelist is a kind of a steep.; int3 & sent1 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
[ "sent6 & sent8 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}); sent19 -> int2: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: {B}{a}; int3 & sent1 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
3
3
15
0
15
that the oligarch suffers foster-child but it is not a trolleybus is not right.
¬({C}{b} & ¬{D}{b})
14
[ "sent5 -> int4: the fact that the fragmentation does not recommend Hilo and does not wrangle does not hold if the fact that it is alkahestic is not wrong.; sent4 & sent10 -> int5: the pledgee does recommend Aberdare.; sent13 & int5 -> int6: that the Wolf is either not popular or non-parietal or both does not hold.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that that the fact that it is unpopular and/or it is not parietal is not wrong is not true.; int7 & sent15 -> int8: the plywood is not earthly.; sent11 & int8 -> int9: that the fragmentation is alkahestic hold.; int4 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the fragmentation does not recommend Hilo and it does not wrangle does not hold.; sent17 & int10 -> int11: the lighter does not recommend Hilo.; sent16 & int11 -> int12: the folderal does recommend Hilo.; sent14 & int12 -> int13: the tiramisu recommends Hilo.; sent7 & int13 -> int14: the tiramisu is a steep but not a Camptosorus.; int14 -> int15: something is steep thing that is not a Camptosorus.;" ]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = that the oligarch does suffer foster-child but it is not a trolleybus is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the panelist is a steep then the oligarch suffers foster-child and is not a kind of a trolleybus. sent2: if the panelist does steep the oligarch suffers foster-child. sent3: the oligarch does suffer foster-child. sent4: if the pledgee does localize then the fact that it does recommend Aberdare is correct. sent5: if something is alkahestic then that it does not recommend Hilo and it does not wrangle is wrong. sent6: if the panelist is not a caranday the fact that that it does not recommend walkover and it interrelates is right is wrong. sent7: if the tiramisu does recommend Hilo it steeps and is not a Camptosorus. sent8: the panelist is not a caranday. sent9: that the panelist does recommend walkover and it does interrelate is not right. sent10: the pledgee localizes. sent11: the fragmentation is not non-alkahestic if the plywood is not earthly. sent12: the panelist is a kind of a steep if it recommends walkover. sent13: if the pledgee does recommend Aberdare that the fact that the Wolf is unpopular and/or not parietal does not hold is not false. sent14: if the folderal does recommend Hilo the tiramisu recommend Hilo. sent15: the plywood is not earthly if there exists something such that the fact that it is unpopular or it is not parietal or both is wrong. sent16: that the folderal does recommend Hilo is not false if that the lighter does not recommend Hilo is not false. sent17: the lighter does not recommend Hilo if that that the fragmentation does not recommend Hilo and it does not wrangle is correct does not hold. sent18: something steeps if it recommends walkover. sent19: something does steep if the fact that it does not recommend walkover and it does interrelate is wrong. ; $proof$ =
sent6 & sent8 -> int1: that the panelist does not recommend walkover and does interrelate is incorrect.; sent19 -> int2: if the fact that the panelist does not recommend walkover but it does interrelate is not right then it is a steep.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the panelist is a kind of a steep.; int3 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
DeductionInstance
if the panelist is not a caranday the fact that that it does not recommend walkover and it interrelates is right is wrong.
[ "the panelist is not a caranday.", "something does steep if the fact that it does not recommend walkover and it does interrelate is wrong.", "if the panelist is a steep then the oligarch suffers foster-child and is not a kind of a trolleybus." ]
[ "If the panelist is not a caranday, the fact that it does not recommend walkover is wrong.", "The fact that the panelist does not recommend walkover is wrong.", "The fact that it does not recommend walkover is wrong if the panelist is not a caranday." ]
The fact that the panelist does not recommend walkover is wrong.
something does steep if the fact that it does not recommend walkover and it does interrelate is wrong.
that the oligarch does suffer foster-child but it is not a trolleybus is false.
sent1: if the panelist is a steep then the oligarch suffers foster-child and is not a kind of a trolleybus. sent2: if the panelist does steep the oligarch suffers foster-child. sent3: the oligarch does suffer foster-child. sent4: if the pledgee does localize then the fact that it does recommend Aberdare is correct. sent5: if something is alkahestic then that it does not recommend Hilo and it does not wrangle is wrong. sent6: if the panelist is not a caranday the fact that that it does not recommend walkover and it interrelates is right is wrong. sent7: if the tiramisu does recommend Hilo it steeps and is not a Camptosorus. sent8: the panelist is not a caranday. sent9: that the panelist does recommend walkover and it does interrelate is not right. sent10: the pledgee localizes. sent11: the fragmentation is not non-alkahestic if the plywood is not earthly. sent12: the panelist is a kind of a steep if it recommends walkover. sent13: if the pledgee does recommend Aberdare that the fact that the Wolf is unpopular and/or not parietal does not hold is not false. sent14: if the folderal does recommend Hilo the tiramisu recommend Hilo. sent15: the plywood is not earthly if there exists something such that the fact that it is unpopular or it is not parietal or both is wrong. sent16: that the folderal does recommend Hilo is not false if that the lighter does not recommend Hilo is not false. sent17: the lighter does not recommend Hilo if that that the fragmentation does not recommend Hilo and it does not wrangle is correct does not hold. sent18: something steeps if it recommends walkover. sent19: something does steep if the fact that it does not recommend walkover and it does interrelate is wrong.
¬({C}{b} & ¬{D}{b})
sent1: {B}{a} -> ({C}{b} & ¬{D}{b}) sent2: {B}{a} -> {C}{b} sent3: {C}{b} sent4: {M}{i} -> {L}{i} sent5: (x): {G}x -> ¬(¬{F}x & ¬{H}x) sent6: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent7: {F}{c} -> ({B}{c} & ¬{E}{c}) sent8: ¬{A}{a} sent9: ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent10: {M}{i} sent11: ¬{I}{g} -> {G}{f} sent12: {AA}{a} -> {B}{a} sent13: {L}{i} -> ¬({J}{h} v ¬{K}{h}) sent14: {F}{d} -> {F}{c} sent15: (x): ¬({J}x v ¬{K}x) -> ¬{I}{g} sent16: ¬{F}{e} -> {F}{d} sent17: ¬(¬{F}{f} & ¬{H}{f}) -> ¬{F}{e} sent18: (x): {AA}x -> {B}x sent19: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x
[ "sent6 & sent8 -> int1: that the panelist does not recommend walkover and does interrelate is incorrect.; sent19 -> int2: if the fact that the panelist does not recommend walkover but it does interrelate is not right then it is a steep.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the panelist is a kind of a steep.; int3 & sent1 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
[ "sent6 & sent8 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}); sent19 -> int2: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: {B}{a}; int3 & sent1 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
3
3
15
0
15
that the oligarch suffers foster-child but it is not a trolleybus is not right.
¬({C}{b} & ¬{D}{b})
14
[ "sent5 -> int4: the fact that the fragmentation does not recommend Hilo and does not wrangle does not hold if the fact that it is alkahestic is not wrong.; sent4 & sent10 -> int5: the pledgee does recommend Aberdare.; sent13 & int5 -> int6: that the Wolf is either not popular or non-parietal or both does not hold.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that that the fact that it is unpopular and/or it is not parietal is not wrong is not true.; int7 & sent15 -> int8: the plywood is not earthly.; sent11 & int8 -> int9: that the fragmentation is alkahestic hold.; int4 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the fragmentation does not recommend Hilo and it does not wrangle does not hold.; sent17 & int10 -> int11: the lighter does not recommend Hilo.; sent16 & int11 -> int12: the folderal does recommend Hilo.; sent14 & int12 -> int13: the tiramisu recommends Hilo.; sent7 & int13 -> int14: the tiramisu is a steep but not a Camptosorus.; int14 -> int15: something is steep thing that is not a Camptosorus.;" ]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = that the oligarch does suffer foster-child but it is not a trolleybus is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the panelist is a steep then the oligarch suffers foster-child and is not a kind of a trolleybus. sent2: if the panelist does steep the oligarch suffers foster-child. sent3: the oligarch does suffer foster-child. sent4: if the pledgee does localize then the fact that it does recommend Aberdare is correct. sent5: if something is alkahestic then that it does not recommend Hilo and it does not wrangle is wrong. sent6: if the panelist is not a caranday the fact that that it does not recommend walkover and it interrelates is right is wrong. sent7: if the tiramisu does recommend Hilo it steeps and is not a Camptosorus. sent8: the panelist is not a caranday. sent9: that the panelist does recommend walkover and it does interrelate is not right. sent10: the pledgee localizes. sent11: the fragmentation is not non-alkahestic if the plywood is not earthly. sent12: the panelist is a kind of a steep if it recommends walkover. sent13: if the pledgee does recommend Aberdare that the fact that the Wolf is unpopular and/or not parietal does not hold is not false. sent14: if the folderal does recommend Hilo the tiramisu recommend Hilo. sent15: the plywood is not earthly if there exists something such that the fact that it is unpopular or it is not parietal or both is wrong. sent16: that the folderal does recommend Hilo is not false if that the lighter does not recommend Hilo is not false. sent17: the lighter does not recommend Hilo if that that the fragmentation does not recommend Hilo and it does not wrangle is correct does not hold. sent18: something steeps if it recommends walkover. sent19: something does steep if the fact that it does not recommend walkover and it does interrelate is wrong. ; $proof$ =
sent6 & sent8 -> int1: that the panelist does not recommend walkover and does interrelate is incorrect.; sent19 -> int2: if the fact that the panelist does not recommend walkover but it does interrelate is not right then it is a steep.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the panelist is a kind of a steep.; int3 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
DeductionInstance
if the panelist is not a caranday the fact that that it does not recommend walkover and it interrelates is right is wrong.
[ "the panelist is not a caranday.", "something does steep if the fact that it does not recommend walkover and it does interrelate is wrong.", "if the panelist is a steep then the oligarch suffers foster-child and is not a kind of a trolleybus." ]
[ "If the panelist is not a caranday, the fact that it does not recommend walkover is wrong.", "The fact that the panelist does not recommend walkover is wrong.", "The fact that it does not recommend walkover is wrong if the panelist is not a caranday." ]
The fact that it does not recommend walkover is wrong if the panelist is not a caranday.
if the panelist is a steep then the oligarch suffers foster-child and is not a kind of a trolleybus.
the muckraker is not practical.
sent1: the waterfall is a kind of a softy. sent2: the waterfall is a gluteus that is a Terence. sent3: the cooter is practical. sent4: the waterfall is a Etropus if it repositions roadworthiness. sent5: The fact that the roadworthiness does reposition waterfall is true. sent6: the muckraker is impractical if the waterfall corrodes pyrophyllite and it is a Etropus. sent7: the propanol is practical. sent8: if the muckraker does corrode pyrophyllite and is a gluteus the fact that the waterfall is not practical is true. sent9: the waterfall is a gluteus. sent10: the fact that something does corrode pyrophyllite if it is similar is not false. sent11: if the fact that the fireboat is not a Etropus is not wrong then it corrodes pyrophyllite and is similar. sent12: the waterfall is a gluteus and it is similar. sent13: something does reposition roadworthiness and it suffers mediant. sent14: the waterfall is a gluteus and is practical.
¬{E}{b}
sent1: {FU}{a} sent2: ({A}{a} & {FF}{a}) sent3: {E}{eu} sent4: {F}{a} -> {D}{a} sent5: {AB}{ab} sent6: ({C}{a} & {D}{a}) -> ¬{E}{b} sent7: {E}{ji} sent8: ({C}{b} & {A}{b}) -> ¬{E}{a} sent9: {A}{a} sent10: (x): {B}x -> {C}x sent11: ¬{D}{c} -> ({C}{c} & {B}{c}) sent12: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) sent13: (Ex): ({F}x & {G}x) sent14: ({A}{a} & {E}{a})
[ "sent12 -> int1: the waterfall is similar.; sent10 -> int2: the fact that the waterfall does corrode pyrophyllite is not incorrect if it is similar.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the waterfall does corrode pyrophyllite is not false.;" ]
UNKNOWN
[ "sent12 -> int1: {B}{a}; sent10 -> int2: {B}{a} -> {C}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: {C}{a};" ]
UNKNOWN
4
null
10
0
10
that the muckraker is practical is not false.
{E}{b}
7
[]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the muckraker is not practical. ; $context$ = sent1: the waterfall is a kind of a softy. sent2: the waterfall is a gluteus that is a Terence. sent3: the cooter is practical. sent4: the waterfall is a Etropus if it repositions roadworthiness. sent5: The fact that the roadworthiness does reposition waterfall is true. sent6: the muckraker is impractical if the waterfall corrodes pyrophyllite and it is a Etropus. sent7: the propanol is practical. sent8: if the muckraker does corrode pyrophyllite and is a gluteus the fact that the waterfall is not practical is true. sent9: the waterfall is a gluteus. sent10: the fact that something does corrode pyrophyllite if it is similar is not false. sent11: if the fact that the fireboat is not a Etropus is not wrong then it corrodes pyrophyllite and is similar. sent12: the waterfall is a gluteus and it is similar. sent13: something does reposition roadworthiness and it suffers mediant. sent14: the waterfall is a gluteus and is practical. ; $proof$ =
__UNKNOWN__
DeductionInstance
the waterfall is a gluteus and it is similar.
[ "the fact that something does corrode pyrophyllite if it is similar is not false." ]
[ "the waterfall is a gluteus and it is similar." ]
the waterfall is a gluteus and it is similar.
the fact that something does corrode pyrophyllite if it is similar is not false.
the slingshot suffers birdfeeder.
sent1: the fact that something is not costal and suffers birdfeeder does not hold if it is a ready. sent2: if the fact that the fact that the coil is not costal is not wrong does not hold it is a kind of a ready. sent3: the fact that the coil is unready is not wrong. sent4: the coil does not suffer birdfeeder. sent5: if the fact that the slingshot is not costal but it suffers birdfeeder is wrong it does not suffers birdfeeder.
{C}{b}
sent1: (x): {B}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & {C}x) sent2: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} sent3: ¬{B}{a} sent4: ¬{C}{a} sent5: ¬(¬{A}{b} & {C}{b}) -> ¬{C}{b}
[ "void -> assump1: Let's assume that the coil is costal.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the coil is ready hold.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the coil is not costal.;" ]
UNKNOWN
[ "void -> assump1: {A}{a}; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: {B}{a}; int1 & sent3 -> int2: #F#; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: ¬{A}{a};" ]
UNKNOWN
4
null
3
0
3
the slingshot does not suffer birdfeeder.
¬{C}{b}
5
[ "sent1 -> int4: if the slingshot is ready then the fact that it is not costal and it suffers birdfeeder is wrong.;" ]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the slingshot suffers birdfeeder. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is not costal and suffers birdfeeder does not hold if it is a ready. sent2: if the fact that the fact that the coil is not costal is not wrong does not hold it is a kind of a ready. sent3: the fact that the coil is unready is not wrong. sent4: the coil does not suffer birdfeeder. sent5: if the fact that the slingshot is not costal but it suffers birdfeeder is wrong it does not suffers birdfeeder. ; $proof$ =
__UNKNOWN__
DeductionInstance
if the fact that the fact that the coil is not costal is not wrong does not hold it is a kind of a ready.
[ "the fact that the coil is unready is not wrong." ]
[ "if the fact that the fact that the coil is not costal is not wrong does not hold it is a kind of a ready." ]
if the fact that the fact that the coil is not costal is not wrong does not hold it is a kind of a ready.
the fact that the coil is unready is not wrong.
the squill is not Aleutians.
sent1: the squill is a partitive. sent2: the purslane is two-wheel. sent3: the squill recommends hayrack. sent4: if there is something such that it is two-wheel then the squill is Aleutians. sent5: the squill is both not Aleutians and two-wheel if it does not suffer Dickinson.
¬{B}{a}
sent1: {DH}{a} sent2: {A}{aa} sent3: {BR}{a} sent4: (x): {A}x -> {B}{a} sent5: ¬{C}{a} -> (¬{B}{a} & {A}{a})
[ "sent2 -> int1: there are two-wheel things.; int1 & sent4 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
[ "sent2 -> int1: (Ex): {A}x; int1 & sent4 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
2
2
3
0
3
the squill is not Aleutians.
¬{B}{a}
5
[]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the squill is not Aleutians. ; $context$ = sent1: the squill is a partitive. sent2: the purslane is two-wheel. sent3: the squill recommends hayrack. sent4: if there is something such that it is two-wheel then the squill is Aleutians. sent5: the squill is both not Aleutians and two-wheel if it does not suffer Dickinson. ; $proof$ =
sent2 -> int1: there are two-wheel things.; int1 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
DeductionInstance
the purslane is two-wheel.
[ "if there is something such that it is two-wheel then the squill is Aleutians." ]
[ "the purslane is two-wheel." ]
the purslane is two-wheel.
if there is something such that it is two-wheel then the squill is Aleutians.
the onomasticsness happens.
sent1: if the hug happens then that the CPR does not occur and the studentship does not occur is incorrect. sent2: the personification happens. sent3: the onomasticsness occurs if the fact that the fact that the CPR does not occur and the studentship does not occur is not wrong is wrong. sent4: that not the CPR but the studentship occurs is incorrect if the hugging happens.
{B}
sent1: {A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) sent2: {EC} sent3: ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) -> {B} sent4: {A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & {AB})
[]
UNKNOWN
[]
UNKNOWN
2
null
2
0
2
null
null
null
[]
null
null
$hypothesis$ = the onomasticsness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the hug happens then that the CPR does not occur and the studentship does not occur is incorrect. sent2: the personification happens. sent3: the onomasticsness occurs if the fact that the fact that the CPR does not occur and the studentship does not occur is not wrong is wrong. sent4: that not the CPR but the studentship occurs is incorrect if the hugging happens. ; $proof$ =
__UNKNOWN__
DeductionInstance
that not the CPR but the studentship occurs is incorrect if the hugging happens.
[ "the onomasticsness occurs if the fact that the fact that the CPR does not occur and the studentship does not occur is not wrong is wrong." ]
[ "that not the CPR but the studentship occurs is incorrect if the hugging happens." ]
that not the CPR but the studentship occurs is incorrect if the hugging happens.
the onomasticsness occurs if the fact that the fact that the CPR does not occur and the studentship does not occur is not wrong is wrong.
that the nave is not a sereness but it is cheerful is not true.
sent1: if something is not a stomach it is not a sereness and it is cheerful. sent2: if the vineyard does surf the nave is not a stomach. sent3: the fact that the vineyard is both not a sereness and a stomach is correct if it is not a surf. sent4: the nave is not a sereness if it is not a stomach. sent5: the nave does not stomach if the vineyard either recommends uropathy or is a kind of a surf or both. sent6: if the vineyard does not recommend uropathy then that the nave is not a kind of a sereness but it is cheerful is wrong. sent7: The uropathy does recommend vineyard. sent8: the nave is not a sereness. sent9: the vineyard does recommend uropathy. sent10: something does not surf if it does not recommend uropathy.
¬(¬{D}{b} & {E}{b})
sent1: (x): ¬{C}x -> (¬{D}x & {E}x) sent2: {B}{a} -> ¬{C}{b} sent3: ¬{B}{a} -> (¬{D}{a} & {C}{a}) sent4: ¬{C}{b} -> ¬{D}{b} sent5: ({A}{a} v {B}{a}) -> ¬{C}{b} sent6: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{D}{b} & {E}{b}) sent7: {AA}{aa} sent8: ¬{D}{b} sent9: {A}{a} sent10: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬{B}x
[ "sent9 -> int1: the vineyard recommends uropathy and/or is a kind of a surf.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the nave is not a kind of a stomach.; sent1 -> int3: the nave is both not a sereness and not non-cheerful if it does not stomach.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
[ "sent9 -> int1: ({A}{a} v {B}{a}); int1 & sent5 -> int2: ¬{C}{b}; sent1 -> int3: ¬{C}{b} -> (¬{D}{b} & {E}{b}); int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
3
3
7
0
7
the fact that the nave is not a sereness and is cheerful does not hold.
¬(¬{D}{b} & {E}{b})
5
[]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = that the nave is not a sereness but it is cheerful is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a stomach it is not a sereness and it is cheerful. sent2: if the vineyard does surf the nave is not a stomach. sent3: the fact that the vineyard is both not a sereness and a stomach is correct if it is not a surf. sent4: the nave is not a sereness if it is not a stomach. sent5: the nave does not stomach if the vineyard either recommends uropathy or is a kind of a surf or both. sent6: if the vineyard does not recommend uropathy then that the nave is not a kind of a sereness but it is cheerful is wrong. sent7: The uropathy does recommend vineyard. sent8: the nave is not a sereness. sent9: the vineyard does recommend uropathy. sent10: something does not surf if it does not recommend uropathy. ; $proof$ =
sent9 -> int1: the vineyard recommends uropathy and/or is a kind of a surf.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the nave is not a kind of a stomach.; sent1 -> int3: the nave is both not a sereness and not non-cheerful if it does not stomach.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
DeductionInstance
the vineyard does recommend uropathy.
[ "the nave does not stomach if the vineyard either recommends uropathy or is a kind of a surf or both.", "if something is not a stomach it is not a sereness and it is cheerful." ]
[ "The vineyard has a recommendation for uropathy.", "uropathy is recommended by the vineyard." ]
The vineyard has a recommendation for uropathy.
the nave does not stomach if the vineyard either recommends uropathy or is a kind of a surf or both.
that the nave is not a sereness but it is cheerful is not true.
sent1: if something is not a stomach it is not a sereness and it is cheerful. sent2: if the vineyard does surf the nave is not a stomach. sent3: the fact that the vineyard is both not a sereness and a stomach is correct if it is not a surf. sent4: the nave is not a sereness if it is not a stomach. sent5: the nave does not stomach if the vineyard either recommends uropathy or is a kind of a surf or both. sent6: if the vineyard does not recommend uropathy then that the nave is not a kind of a sereness but it is cheerful is wrong. sent7: The uropathy does recommend vineyard. sent8: the nave is not a sereness. sent9: the vineyard does recommend uropathy. sent10: something does not surf if it does not recommend uropathy.
¬(¬{D}{b} & {E}{b})
sent1: (x): ¬{C}x -> (¬{D}x & {E}x) sent2: {B}{a} -> ¬{C}{b} sent3: ¬{B}{a} -> (¬{D}{a} & {C}{a}) sent4: ¬{C}{b} -> ¬{D}{b} sent5: ({A}{a} v {B}{a}) -> ¬{C}{b} sent6: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{D}{b} & {E}{b}) sent7: {AA}{aa} sent8: ¬{D}{b} sent9: {A}{a} sent10: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬{B}x
[ "sent9 -> int1: the vineyard recommends uropathy and/or is a kind of a surf.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the nave is not a kind of a stomach.; sent1 -> int3: the nave is both not a sereness and not non-cheerful if it does not stomach.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
[ "sent9 -> int1: ({A}{a} v {B}{a}); int1 & sent5 -> int2: ¬{C}{b}; sent1 -> int3: ¬{C}{b} -> (¬{D}{b} & {E}{b}); int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
3
3
7
0
7
the fact that the nave is not a sereness and is cheerful does not hold.
¬(¬{D}{b} & {E}{b})
5
[]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = that the nave is not a sereness but it is cheerful is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a stomach it is not a sereness and it is cheerful. sent2: if the vineyard does surf the nave is not a stomach. sent3: the fact that the vineyard is both not a sereness and a stomach is correct if it is not a surf. sent4: the nave is not a sereness if it is not a stomach. sent5: the nave does not stomach if the vineyard either recommends uropathy or is a kind of a surf or both. sent6: if the vineyard does not recommend uropathy then that the nave is not a kind of a sereness but it is cheerful is wrong. sent7: The uropathy does recommend vineyard. sent8: the nave is not a sereness. sent9: the vineyard does recommend uropathy. sent10: something does not surf if it does not recommend uropathy. ; $proof$ =
sent9 -> int1: the vineyard recommends uropathy and/or is a kind of a surf.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the nave is not a kind of a stomach.; sent1 -> int3: the nave is both not a sereness and not non-cheerful if it does not stomach.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
DeductionInstance
the vineyard does recommend uropathy.
[ "the nave does not stomach if the vineyard either recommends uropathy or is a kind of a surf or both.", "if something is not a stomach it is not a sereness and it is cheerful." ]
[ "The vineyard has a recommendation for uropathy.", "uropathy is recommended by the vineyard." ]
uropathy is recommended by the vineyard.
if something is not a stomach it is not a sereness and it is cheerful.
the quarterback is zoological.
sent1: the fact that the gasohol is a widgeon is right if that the Norinyl does not recommend spy and does not circumnavigate is incorrect. sent2: the quarterback is not zoological if the omnibus is a valetudinarian and a thymine. sent3: something that suffers shoebill is zoological. sent4: if something is a widgeon and does reposition trade-last the fact that it is not zoological is not incorrect. sent5: the fact that something does not recommend spy and does not circumnavigate is not correct if it is not Mozartian. sent6: that either the omnibus is not a coward or it suffers shoebill or both is incorrect if the gasohol is not zoological. sent7: the Norinyl is not Mozartian if the millwright is not Mozartian. sent8: the flange is a thymine and is a valetudinarian if the quarterback does not suffer shoebill. sent9: the quarterback is both a thymine and a valetudinarian. sent10: if the gasohol is valetudinarian the omnibus is a kind of a valetudinarian. sent11: if the fact that the omnibus either is not a kind of a coward or does suffer shoebill or both is not correct then the quarterback does not suffer shoebill. sent12: the quarterback is zoological if it is unfit. sent13: something does not reposition gourde if the fact that it does suffer correction and it reposition gourde is incorrect. sent14: something suffers consonance if it circumnavigates. sent15: the bluestone suffers shoebill. sent16: the fact that the heterosexual suffers correction and repositions gourde does not hold. sent17: the millwright is not Mozartian. sent18: if the quarterback suffers shoebill it is Zoroastrian.
{D}{a}
sent1: ¬(¬{I}{d} & ¬{H}{d}) -> {G}{c} sent2: ({B}{b} & {A}{b}) -> ¬{D}{a} sent3: (x): {C}x -> {D}x sent4: (x): ({G}x & {F}x) -> ¬{D}x sent5: (x): ¬{L}x -> ¬(¬{I}x & ¬{H}x) sent6: ¬{D}{c} -> ¬(¬{E}{b} v {C}{b}) sent7: ¬{L}{f} -> ¬{L}{d} sent8: ¬{C}{a} -> ({A}{ce} & {B}{ce}) sent9: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) sent10: {B}{c} -> {B}{b} sent11: ¬(¬{E}{b} v {C}{b}) -> ¬{C}{a} sent12: {HB}{a} -> {D}{a} sent13: (x): ¬({N}x & {K}x) -> ¬{K}x sent14: (x): {H}x -> {ID}x sent15: {C}{fp} sent16: ¬({N}{e} & {K}{e}) sent17: ¬{L}{f} sent18: {C}{a} -> {GF}{a}
[ "sent9 -> int1: the quarterback is a thymine.; sent3 -> int2: if that the quarterback does suffer shoebill is true it is zoological.;" ]
UNKNOWN
[ "sent9 -> int1: {A}{a}; sent3 -> int2: {C}{a} -> {D}{a};" ]
UNKNOWN
3
null
16
0
16
the quarterback is not zoological.
¬{D}{a}
5
[]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the quarterback is zoological. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the gasohol is a widgeon is right if that the Norinyl does not recommend spy and does not circumnavigate is incorrect. sent2: the quarterback is not zoological if the omnibus is a valetudinarian and a thymine. sent3: something that suffers shoebill is zoological. sent4: if something is a widgeon and does reposition trade-last the fact that it is not zoological is not incorrect. sent5: the fact that something does not recommend spy and does not circumnavigate is not correct if it is not Mozartian. sent6: that either the omnibus is not a coward or it suffers shoebill or both is incorrect if the gasohol is not zoological. sent7: the Norinyl is not Mozartian if the millwright is not Mozartian. sent8: the flange is a thymine and is a valetudinarian if the quarterback does not suffer shoebill. sent9: the quarterback is both a thymine and a valetudinarian. sent10: if the gasohol is valetudinarian the omnibus is a kind of a valetudinarian. sent11: if the fact that the omnibus either is not a kind of a coward or does suffer shoebill or both is not correct then the quarterback does not suffer shoebill. sent12: the quarterback is zoological if it is unfit. sent13: something does not reposition gourde if the fact that it does suffer correction and it reposition gourde is incorrect. sent14: something suffers consonance if it circumnavigates. sent15: the bluestone suffers shoebill. sent16: the fact that the heterosexual suffers correction and repositions gourde does not hold. sent17: the millwright is not Mozartian. sent18: if the quarterback suffers shoebill it is Zoroastrian. ; $proof$ =
__UNKNOWN__
DeductionInstance
the quarterback is both a thymine and a valetudinarian.
[ "something that suffers shoebill is zoological." ]
[ "the quarterback is both a thymine and a valetudinarian." ]
the quarterback is both a thymine and a valetudinarian.
something that suffers shoebill is zoological.
the probating does not occur.
sent1: both the non-nasopharyngealness and the non-geriatricsness occurs. sent2: if the repositioning man-of-the-earth occurs not the snooker but the Muhammadanness occurs. sent3: that the repositioning man-of-the-earth does not occur results in that not the Muhammadanness but the snookering happens. sent4: that the plume does not occur is caused by the suffering fugitive or that the multilevelness occurs or both. sent5: if the plume does not occur and the snookering does not occur the probate does not occur. sent6: the suffering fugitive occurs.
¬{E}
sent1: (¬{BT} & ¬{HJ}) sent2: {G} -> (¬{D} & {F}) sent3: ¬{G} -> (¬{F} & {D}) sent4: ({A} v {B}) -> ¬{C} sent5: (¬{C} & ¬{D}) -> ¬{E} sent6: {A}
[ "sent6 -> int1: the suffering fugitive and/or the multilevelness happens.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the plume does not occur.;" ]
UNKNOWN
[ "sent6 -> int1: ({A} v {B}); int1 & sent4 -> int2: ¬{C};" ]
UNKNOWN
4
null
2
0
2
the probate occurs.
{E}
6
[]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the probating does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: both the non-nasopharyngealness and the non-geriatricsness occurs. sent2: if the repositioning man-of-the-earth occurs not the snooker but the Muhammadanness occurs. sent3: that the repositioning man-of-the-earth does not occur results in that not the Muhammadanness but the snookering happens. sent4: that the plume does not occur is caused by the suffering fugitive or that the multilevelness occurs or both. sent5: if the plume does not occur and the snookering does not occur the probate does not occur. sent6: the suffering fugitive occurs. ; $proof$ =
__UNKNOWN__
DeductionInstance
the suffering fugitive occurs.
[ "that the plume does not occur is caused by the suffering fugitive or that the multilevelness occurs or both." ]
[ "the suffering fugitive occurs." ]
the suffering fugitive occurs.
that the plume does not occur is caused by the suffering fugitive or that the multilevelness occurs or both.
there exists something such that if it does not suffer tody and is not random it repositions consonance.
sent1: there exists something such that if it suffers tody and it is nonrandom then it repositions consonance. sent2: if something that does not reposition refraction is not a kind of a Pacific it is comprehensible.
(Ex): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x
sent1: (Ex): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x sent2: (x): (¬{D}x & ¬{FE}x) -> {CU}x
[]
UNKNOWN
[]
UNKNOWN
2
null
2
0
2
there is something such that if it does not reposition refraction and it is not a Pacific it is comprehensible.
(Ex): (¬{D}x & ¬{FE}x) -> {CU}x
2
[ "sent2 -> int1: if the chancery does not reposition refraction and it is not a kind of a Pacific then it is comprehensible.; int1 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
PROVED
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it does not suffer tody and is not random it repositions consonance. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it suffers tody and it is nonrandom then it repositions consonance. sent2: if something that does not reposition refraction is not a kind of a Pacific it is comprehensible. ; $proof$ =
__UNKNOWN__
DeductionInstance
if something that does not reposition refraction is not a kind of a Pacific it is comprehensible.
[ "there exists something such that if it suffers tody and it is nonrandom then it repositions consonance." ]
[ "if something that does not reposition refraction is not a kind of a Pacific it is comprehensible." ]
if something that does not reposition refraction is not a kind of a Pacific it is comprehensible.
there exists something such that if it suffers tody and it is nonrandom then it repositions consonance.
the stopping does not occur.
sent1: the stopping occurs if the repositioning washed happens. sent2: the stopping does not occur and the monophonicness does not occur if the repositioning washed does not occur. sent3: the monophonicness and the repositioning washed happens.
¬{C}
sent1: {B} -> {C} sent2: ¬{B} -> (¬{C} & ¬{A}) sent3: ({A} & {B})
[ "sent3 -> int1: the repositioning washed occurs.; sent1 & int1 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
[ "sent3 -> int1: {B}; sent1 & int1 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
2
2
1
0
1
the stopping does not occur.
¬{C}
6
[]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the stopping does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the stopping occurs if the repositioning washed happens. sent2: the stopping does not occur and the monophonicness does not occur if the repositioning washed does not occur. sent3: the monophonicness and the repositioning washed happens. ; $proof$ =
sent3 -> int1: the repositioning washed occurs.; sent1 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
DeductionInstance
the monophonicness and the repositioning washed happens.
[ "the stopping occurs if the repositioning washed happens." ]
[ "the monophonicness and the repositioning washed happens." ]
the monophonicness and the repositioning washed happens.
the stopping occurs if the repositioning washed happens.
the incredulousness occurs.
sent1: if both the non-nationalness and the non-hydrousness occurs then the repositioning disk does not occur. sent2: if that the calyptrateness occurs and the suffering phlogiston occurs is incorrect then the fact that the thrash does not occur hold. sent3: if that the enzymaticness and the production occurs is not correct that the debarkation does not occur is correct. sent4: if the fact that the production does not occur hold the debarkation does not occur. sent5: that the overshooting does not occur triggers that the non-estuarineness and the suffering washed happens. sent6: if the repositioning disk does not occur the fact that the debarkation does not occur and the incredulousness occurs is not correct. sent7: that the non-nationalness and the non-hydrousness occurs is triggered by that the tree does not occur. sent8: if the estuarineness does not occur and the suffering washed happens then the treeing does not occur. sent9: the hydroxiness does not occur if the fact that the fact that not the debarkation but the incredulousness happens is correct is incorrect. sent10: the acanthoticness does not occur and the overshoot does not occur if the fact that the cholinergicness happens is right. sent11: that both the enzymaticness and the production occurs is not correct if the incredulousness does not occur. sent12: that the debarkation does not occur and the incredulousness does not occur is caused by that the repositioning disk does not occur. sent13: if the hydrousness does not occur then both the debarkation and the repositioning disk happens.
{A}
sent1: (¬{E} & ¬{D}) -> ¬{C} sent2: ¬({EU} & {EN}) -> ¬{CQ} sent3: ¬({AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} sent4: ¬{AB} -> ¬{B} sent5: ¬{I} -> (¬{H} & {G}) sent6: ¬{C} -> ¬(¬{B} & {A}) sent7: ¬{F} -> (¬{E} & ¬{D}) sent8: (¬{H} & {G}) -> ¬{F} sent9: ¬(¬{B} & {A}) -> ¬{FP} sent10: {K} -> (¬{J} & ¬{I}) sent11: ¬{A} -> ¬({AA} & {AB}) sent12: ¬{C} -> (¬{B} & ¬{A}) sent13: ¬{D} -> ({B} & {C})
[ "void -> assump1: Let's assume that the incredulousness does not occur.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that both the enzymaticness and the production happens is wrong.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the debarkation does not occur.;" ]
UNKNOWN
[ "void -> assump1: ¬{A}; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: ¬({AA} & {AB}); int1 & sent3 -> int2: ¬{B};" ]
UNKNOWN
4
null
10
0
10
the incredulousness does not occur.
¬{A}
11
[]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the incredulousness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if both the non-nationalness and the non-hydrousness occurs then the repositioning disk does not occur. sent2: if that the calyptrateness occurs and the suffering phlogiston occurs is incorrect then the fact that the thrash does not occur hold. sent3: if that the enzymaticness and the production occurs is not correct that the debarkation does not occur is correct. sent4: if the fact that the production does not occur hold the debarkation does not occur. sent5: that the overshooting does not occur triggers that the non-estuarineness and the suffering washed happens. sent6: if the repositioning disk does not occur the fact that the debarkation does not occur and the incredulousness occurs is not correct. sent7: that the non-nationalness and the non-hydrousness occurs is triggered by that the tree does not occur. sent8: if the estuarineness does not occur and the suffering washed happens then the treeing does not occur. sent9: the hydroxiness does not occur if the fact that the fact that not the debarkation but the incredulousness happens is correct is incorrect. sent10: the acanthoticness does not occur and the overshoot does not occur if the fact that the cholinergicness happens is right. sent11: that both the enzymaticness and the production occurs is not correct if the incredulousness does not occur. sent12: that the debarkation does not occur and the incredulousness does not occur is caused by that the repositioning disk does not occur. sent13: if the hydrousness does not occur then both the debarkation and the repositioning disk happens. ; $proof$ =
__UNKNOWN__
DeductionInstance
that both the enzymaticness and the production occurs is not correct if the incredulousness does not occur.
[ "if that the enzymaticness and the production occurs is not correct that the debarkation does not occur is correct." ]
[ "that both the enzymaticness and the production occurs is not correct if the incredulousness does not occur." ]
that both the enzymaticness and the production occurs is not correct if the incredulousness does not occur.
if that the enzymaticness and the production occurs is not correct that the debarkation does not occur is correct.
the bubo is not a propeller and/or does not reposition repetitiveness.
sent1: there exists something such that that it does not reposition repetitiveness and does suffer Hadean does not hold. sent2: the bubo repositions repetitiveness. sent3: that the blowjob is not a kind of a propeller or it is not Arawakan or both is not true. sent4: there is something such that it does not reposition repetitiveness and it is a kind of a propeller. sent5: the fact that the bubo does reposition repetitiveness is not incorrect if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a propeller. sent6: there exists something such that the fact that it is Arawakan and it does reposition repetitiveness does not hold. sent7: there exists something such that that it does not reposition repetitiveness and it is Arawakan is not right. sent8: if there is something such that that it does not suffer Hadean and it is Arawakan is not right then the highflier does reposition repetitiveness. sent9: that the blowjob does not suffer Hadean but it is Arawakan is false. sent10: if the highflier repositions repetitiveness then the fact that the fact that either the bubo is not a propeller or it does not repositions repetitiveness or both is correct is incorrect. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it does not suffer Hadean and it repositions repetitiveness is not true. sent12: the bubo is not a propeller or it does not reposition repetitiveness or both if the highflier does not suffer retrial. sent13: there exists something such that the fact that it is a propeller and it repositions repetitiveness is wrong. sent14: if there exists something such that that it is not a propeller and it does suffer Hadean is false the bubo does reposition repetitiveness. sent15: that the highflier does not suffer retrial hold if the actuator does suffer retrial and it is resinlike. sent16: if the highflier repositions repetitiveness then the bubo repositions repetitiveness. sent17: that the infant's-breath does not reposition repetitiveness is not correct.
(¬{C}{b} v ¬{A}{b})
sent1: (Ex): ¬(¬{A}x & {AA}x) sent2: {A}{b} sent3: ¬(¬{C}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) sent4: (Ex): (¬{A}x & {C}x) sent5: (x): ¬{C}x -> {A}{b} sent6: (Ex): ¬({AB}x & {A}x) sent7: (Ex): ¬(¬{A}x & {AB}x) sent8: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {A}{a} sent9: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent10: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{C}{b} v ¬{A}{b}) sent11: (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & {A}x) sent12: ¬{B}{a} -> (¬{C}{b} v ¬{A}{b}) sent13: (Ex): ¬({C}x & {A}x) sent14: (x): ¬(¬{C}x & {AA}x) -> {A}{b} sent15: ({B}{c} & {D}{c}) -> ¬{B}{a} sent16: {A}{a} -> {A}{b} sent17: {A}{fj}
[ "sent9 -> int1: there is something such that that it does not suffer Hadean and it is Arawakan is wrong.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the highflier does reposition repetitiveness.; sent10 & int2 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
[ "sent9 -> int1: (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x); int1 & sent8 -> int2: {A}{a}; sent10 & int2 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
3
3
14
0
14
the bubo is not a propeller or it does not reposition repetitiveness or both.
(¬{C}{b} v ¬{A}{b})
5
[]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the bubo is not a propeller and/or does not reposition repetitiveness. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that that it does not reposition repetitiveness and does suffer Hadean does not hold. sent2: the bubo repositions repetitiveness. sent3: that the blowjob is not a kind of a propeller or it is not Arawakan or both is not true. sent4: there is something such that it does not reposition repetitiveness and it is a kind of a propeller. sent5: the fact that the bubo does reposition repetitiveness is not incorrect if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a propeller. sent6: there exists something such that the fact that it is Arawakan and it does reposition repetitiveness does not hold. sent7: there exists something such that that it does not reposition repetitiveness and it is Arawakan is not right. sent8: if there is something such that that it does not suffer Hadean and it is Arawakan is not right then the highflier does reposition repetitiveness. sent9: that the blowjob does not suffer Hadean but it is Arawakan is false. sent10: if the highflier repositions repetitiveness then the fact that the fact that either the bubo is not a propeller or it does not repositions repetitiveness or both is correct is incorrect. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it does not suffer Hadean and it repositions repetitiveness is not true. sent12: the bubo is not a propeller or it does not reposition repetitiveness or both if the highflier does not suffer retrial. sent13: there exists something such that the fact that it is a propeller and it repositions repetitiveness is wrong. sent14: if there exists something such that that it is not a propeller and it does suffer Hadean is false the bubo does reposition repetitiveness. sent15: that the highflier does not suffer retrial hold if the actuator does suffer retrial and it is resinlike. sent16: if the highflier repositions repetitiveness then the bubo repositions repetitiveness. sent17: that the infant's-breath does not reposition repetitiveness is not correct. ; $proof$ =
sent9 -> int1: there is something such that that it does not suffer Hadean and it is Arawakan is wrong.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the highflier does reposition repetitiveness.; sent10 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
DeductionInstance
that the blowjob does not suffer Hadean but it is Arawakan is false.
[ "if there is something such that that it does not suffer Hadean and it is Arawakan is not right then the highflier does reposition repetitiveness.", "if the highflier repositions repetitiveness then the fact that the fact that either the bubo is not a propeller or it does not repositions repetitiveness or both is correct is incorrect." ]
[ "The blowjob does not suffer Hadean.", "It is false that the blowjob does not suffer Hadean." ]
The blowjob does not suffer Hadean.
if there is something such that that it does not suffer Hadean and it is Arawakan is not right then the highflier does reposition repetitiveness.
the bubo is not a propeller and/or does not reposition repetitiveness.
sent1: there exists something such that that it does not reposition repetitiveness and does suffer Hadean does not hold. sent2: the bubo repositions repetitiveness. sent3: that the blowjob is not a kind of a propeller or it is not Arawakan or both is not true. sent4: there is something such that it does not reposition repetitiveness and it is a kind of a propeller. sent5: the fact that the bubo does reposition repetitiveness is not incorrect if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a propeller. sent6: there exists something such that the fact that it is Arawakan and it does reposition repetitiveness does not hold. sent7: there exists something such that that it does not reposition repetitiveness and it is Arawakan is not right. sent8: if there is something such that that it does not suffer Hadean and it is Arawakan is not right then the highflier does reposition repetitiveness. sent9: that the blowjob does not suffer Hadean but it is Arawakan is false. sent10: if the highflier repositions repetitiveness then the fact that the fact that either the bubo is not a propeller or it does not repositions repetitiveness or both is correct is incorrect. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it does not suffer Hadean and it repositions repetitiveness is not true. sent12: the bubo is not a propeller or it does not reposition repetitiveness or both if the highflier does not suffer retrial. sent13: there exists something such that the fact that it is a propeller and it repositions repetitiveness is wrong. sent14: if there exists something such that that it is not a propeller and it does suffer Hadean is false the bubo does reposition repetitiveness. sent15: that the highflier does not suffer retrial hold if the actuator does suffer retrial and it is resinlike. sent16: if the highflier repositions repetitiveness then the bubo repositions repetitiveness. sent17: that the infant's-breath does not reposition repetitiveness is not correct.
(¬{C}{b} v ¬{A}{b})
sent1: (Ex): ¬(¬{A}x & {AA}x) sent2: {A}{b} sent3: ¬(¬{C}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) sent4: (Ex): (¬{A}x & {C}x) sent5: (x): ¬{C}x -> {A}{b} sent6: (Ex): ¬({AB}x & {A}x) sent7: (Ex): ¬(¬{A}x & {AB}x) sent8: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {A}{a} sent9: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent10: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{C}{b} v ¬{A}{b}) sent11: (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & {A}x) sent12: ¬{B}{a} -> (¬{C}{b} v ¬{A}{b}) sent13: (Ex): ¬({C}x & {A}x) sent14: (x): ¬(¬{C}x & {AA}x) -> {A}{b} sent15: ({B}{c} & {D}{c}) -> ¬{B}{a} sent16: {A}{a} -> {A}{b} sent17: {A}{fj}
[ "sent9 -> int1: there is something such that that it does not suffer Hadean and it is Arawakan is wrong.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the highflier does reposition repetitiveness.; sent10 & int2 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
[ "sent9 -> int1: (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x); int1 & sent8 -> int2: {A}{a}; sent10 & int2 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
3
3
14
0
14
the bubo is not a propeller or it does not reposition repetitiveness or both.
(¬{C}{b} v ¬{A}{b})
5
[]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the bubo is not a propeller and/or does not reposition repetitiveness. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that that it does not reposition repetitiveness and does suffer Hadean does not hold. sent2: the bubo repositions repetitiveness. sent3: that the blowjob is not a kind of a propeller or it is not Arawakan or both is not true. sent4: there is something such that it does not reposition repetitiveness and it is a kind of a propeller. sent5: the fact that the bubo does reposition repetitiveness is not incorrect if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a propeller. sent6: there exists something such that the fact that it is Arawakan and it does reposition repetitiveness does not hold. sent7: there exists something such that that it does not reposition repetitiveness and it is Arawakan is not right. sent8: if there is something such that that it does not suffer Hadean and it is Arawakan is not right then the highflier does reposition repetitiveness. sent9: that the blowjob does not suffer Hadean but it is Arawakan is false. sent10: if the highflier repositions repetitiveness then the fact that the fact that either the bubo is not a propeller or it does not repositions repetitiveness or both is correct is incorrect. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it does not suffer Hadean and it repositions repetitiveness is not true. sent12: the bubo is not a propeller or it does not reposition repetitiveness or both if the highflier does not suffer retrial. sent13: there exists something such that the fact that it is a propeller and it repositions repetitiveness is wrong. sent14: if there exists something such that that it is not a propeller and it does suffer Hadean is false the bubo does reposition repetitiveness. sent15: that the highflier does not suffer retrial hold if the actuator does suffer retrial and it is resinlike. sent16: if the highflier repositions repetitiveness then the bubo repositions repetitiveness. sent17: that the infant's-breath does not reposition repetitiveness is not correct. ; $proof$ =
sent9 -> int1: there is something such that that it does not suffer Hadean and it is Arawakan is wrong.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the highflier does reposition repetitiveness.; sent10 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
DeductionInstance
that the blowjob does not suffer Hadean but it is Arawakan is false.
[ "if there is something such that that it does not suffer Hadean and it is Arawakan is not right then the highflier does reposition repetitiveness.", "if the highflier repositions repetitiveness then the fact that the fact that either the bubo is not a propeller or it does not repositions repetitiveness or both is correct is incorrect." ]
[ "The blowjob does not suffer Hadean.", "It is false that the blowjob does not suffer Hadean." ]
It is false that the blowjob does not suffer Hadean.
if the highflier repositions repetitiveness then the fact that the fact that either the bubo is not a propeller or it does not repositions repetitiveness or both is correct is incorrect.
that the desperate is an umbilical is not false.
sent1: that the latex is aperiodic hold. sent2: the desperate is an umbilical if the fact that it is both non-Dantean and prehistoric is false. sent3: a aperiodic thing that does not suffer masterpiece is not a kind of an umbilical. sent4: the fact that the desperate is Dantean and it is not non-prehistoric is not true. sent5: if the latex is aperiodic the fact that the desperate is not Dantean and is prehistoric does not hold. sent6: if the latex is aperiodic that the desperate is Dantean and prehistoric is false.
{B}{b}
sent1: {A}{a} sent2: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) -> {B}{b} sent3: (x): ({A}x & ¬{C}x) -> ¬{B}x sent4: ¬({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) sent5: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) sent6: {A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{b} & {AB}{b})
[ "sent5 & sent1 -> int1: that the desperate is not Dantean but it is prehistoric does not hold.; int1 & sent2 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
[ "sent5 & sent1 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}); int1 & sent2 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
2
2
3
0
3
the desperate is not umbilical.
¬{B}{b}
5
[ "sent3 -> int2: the desperate is not an umbilical if it is not non-aperiodic and it does not suffer masterpiece.;" ]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = that the desperate is an umbilical is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: that the latex is aperiodic hold. sent2: the desperate is an umbilical if the fact that it is both non-Dantean and prehistoric is false. sent3: a aperiodic thing that does not suffer masterpiece is not a kind of an umbilical. sent4: the fact that the desperate is Dantean and it is not non-prehistoric is not true. sent5: if the latex is aperiodic the fact that the desperate is not Dantean and is prehistoric does not hold. sent6: if the latex is aperiodic that the desperate is Dantean and prehistoric is false. ; $proof$ =
sent5 & sent1 -> int1: that the desperate is not Dantean but it is prehistoric does not hold.; int1 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
DeductionInstance
if the latex is aperiodic the fact that the desperate is not Dantean and is prehistoric does not hold.
[ "that the latex is aperiodic hold.", "the desperate is an umbilical if the fact that it is both non-Dantean and prehistoric is false." ]
[ "The fact that the desperate is not Dantean and is prehistoric does not hold if the latex is aperiodic.", "The fact that the desperate is not Dantean does not hold if the latex is aperiodic." ]
The fact that the desperate is not Dantean and is prehistoric does not hold if the latex is aperiodic.
that the latex is aperiodic hold.
that the desperate is an umbilical is not false.
sent1: that the latex is aperiodic hold. sent2: the desperate is an umbilical if the fact that it is both non-Dantean and prehistoric is false. sent3: a aperiodic thing that does not suffer masterpiece is not a kind of an umbilical. sent4: the fact that the desperate is Dantean and it is not non-prehistoric is not true. sent5: if the latex is aperiodic the fact that the desperate is not Dantean and is prehistoric does not hold. sent6: if the latex is aperiodic that the desperate is Dantean and prehistoric is false.
{B}{b}
sent1: {A}{a} sent2: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) -> {B}{b} sent3: (x): ({A}x & ¬{C}x) -> ¬{B}x sent4: ¬({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) sent5: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) sent6: {A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{b} & {AB}{b})
[ "sent5 & sent1 -> int1: that the desperate is not Dantean but it is prehistoric does not hold.; int1 & sent2 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
[ "sent5 & sent1 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}); int1 & sent2 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
2
2
3
0
3
the desperate is not umbilical.
¬{B}{b}
5
[ "sent3 -> int2: the desperate is not an umbilical if it is not non-aperiodic and it does not suffer masterpiece.;" ]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = that the desperate is an umbilical is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: that the latex is aperiodic hold. sent2: the desperate is an umbilical if the fact that it is both non-Dantean and prehistoric is false. sent3: a aperiodic thing that does not suffer masterpiece is not a kind of an umbilical. sent4: the fact that the desperate is Dantean and it is not non-prehistoric is not true. sent5: if the latex is aperiodic the fact that the desperate is not Dantean and is prehistoric does not hold. sent6: if the latex is aperiodic that the desperate is Dantean and prehistoric is false. ; $proof$ =
sent5 & sent1 -> int1: that the desperate is not Dantean but it is prehistoric does not hold.; int1 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
DeductionInstance
if the latex is aperiodic the fact that the desperate is not Dantean and is prehistoric does not hold.
[ "that the latex is aperiodic hold.", "the desperate is an umbilical if the fact that it is both non-Dantean and prehistoric is false." ]
[ "The fact that the desperate is not Dantean and is prehistoric does not hold if the latex is aperiodic.", "The fact that the desperate is not Dantean does not hold if the latex is aperiodic." ]
The fact that the desperate is not Dantean does not hold if the latex is aperiodic.
the desperate is an umbilical if the fact that it is both non-Dantean and prehistoric is false.
the underwriter recommends bombardon and does not scowl.
sent1: if the bombardon does not recommend bombardon then that the underwriter scowls and does recommend bombardon is not correct. sent2: the bombardon is not expansionist if it does not recommend bombardon. sent3: that the bombardon suffers mothball does not hold. sent4: the bombardon is not a vizier. sent5: if that the bangle is not pyemic but expansionist does not hold the bombardon is expansionist. sent6: that that the underwriter scowls but it does not recommend bombardon is not true is true if the bombardon does not recommend bombardon. sent7: that the underwriter does recommend bombardon and it does scowl does not hold. sent8: if the fact that something is not a kind of a Aalto and is a kind of a salience is false it does not striate. sent9: the fact that the underwriter does recommend bombardon and does not scowl is incorrect if the bombardon does not scowl. sent10: the underwriter recommends bombardon but it does not scowl if the bombardon is expansionist. sent11: if the underwriter is not expansionist it does not scowl. sent12: that the underwriter is expansionist and does not scowl is wrong. sent13: if the underwriter does not scowl then that the fact that the bombardon recommends bombardon and does not scowl is not true is right. sent14: the fact that the nebuchadnezzar is not a Aalto but it is a kind of a salience is not correct. sent15: the underwriter is not expansionist. sent16: if something does nick the fact that it is non-pyemic thing that is expansionist is incorrect. sent17: if the bombardon is not expansionist then it does not scowl. sent18: if the bombardon does not scowl then the fact that the underwriter does recommend bombardon and it does scowl does not hold. sent19: the bombardon does not recommend gillie. sent20: the bombardon is not expansionist.
({D}{b} & ¬{B}{b})
sent1: ¬{D}{a} -> ¬({B}{b} & {D}{b}) sent2: ¬{D}{a} -> ¬{A}{a} sent3: ¬{IH}{a} sent4: ¬{GO}{a} sent5: ¬(¬{C}{c} & {A}{c}) -> {A}{a} sent6: ¬{D}{a} -> ¬({B}{b} & ¬{D}{b}) sent7: ¬({D}{b} & {B}{b}) sent8: (x): ¬(¬{H}x & {I}x) -> ¬{F}x sent9: ¬{B}{a} -> ¬({D}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) sent10: {A}{a} -> ({D}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) sent11: ¬{A}{b} -> ¬{B}{b} sent12: ¬({A}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) sent13: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬({D}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) sent14: ¬(¬{H}{e} & {I}{e}) sent15: ¬{A}{b} sent16: (x): {E}x -> ¬(¬{C}x & {A}x) sent17: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{B}{a} sent18: ¬{B}{a} -> ¬({D}{b} & {B}{b}) sent19: ¬{EQ}{a} sent20: ¬{A}{a}
[ "sent17 & sent20 -> int1: the bombardon does not scowl.; sent9 & int1 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
[ "sent17 & sent20 -> int1: ¬{B}{a}; sent9 & int1 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
2
2
17
0
17
the underwriter recommends bombardon but it does not scowl.
({D}{b} & ¬{B}{b})
9
[ "sent16 -> int2: the fact that the bangle is not pyemic but it is expansionist does not hold if it does nick.; sent8 -> int3: if the fact that the nebuchadnezzar is not a Aalto and is a salience is wrong then it is not striate.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: the nebuchadnezzar does not striate.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that it is not striate.;" ]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the underwriter recommends bombardon and does not scowl. ; $context$ = sent1: if the bombardon does not recommend bombardon then that the underwriter scowls and does recommend bombardon is not correct. sent2: the bombardon is not expansionist if it does not recommend bombardon. sent3: that the bombardon suffers mothball does not hold. sent4: the bombardon is not a vizier. sent5: if that the bangle is not pyemic but expansionist does not hold the bombardon is expansionist. sent6: that that the underwriter scowls but it does not recommend bombardon is not true is true if the bombardon does not recommend bombardon. sent7: that the underwriter does recommend bombardon and it does scowl does not hold. sent8: if the fact that something is not a kind of a Aalto and is a kind of a salience is false it does not striate. sent9: the fact that the underwriter does recommend bombardon and does not scowl is incorrect if the bombardon does not scowl. sent10: the underwriter recommends bombardon but it does not scowl if the bombardon is expansionist. sent11: if the underwriter is not expansionist it does not scowl. sent12: that the underwriter is expansionist and does not scowl is wrong. sent13: if the underwriter does not scowl then that the fact that the bombardon recommends bombardon and does not scowl is not true is right. sent14: the fact that the nebuchadnezzar is not a Aalto but it is a kind of a salience is not correct. sent15: the underwriter is not expansionist. sent16: if something does nick the fact that it is non-pyemic thing that is expansionist is incorrect. sent17: if the bombardon is not expansionist then it does not scowl. sent18: if the bombardon does not scowl then the fact that the underwriter does recommend bombardon and it does scowl does not hold. sent19: the bombardon does not recommend gillie. sent20: the bombardon is not expansionist. ; $proof$ =
sent17 & sent20 -> int1: the bombardon does not scowl.; sent9 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
DeductionInstance
if the bombardon is not expansionist then it does not scowl.
[ "the bombardon is not expansionist.", "the fact that the underwriter does recommend bombardon and does not scowl is incorrect if the bombardon does not scowl." ]
[ "The bombardon does not scowl if it is not expansionist.", "The bombardon doesn't scowl if it's not expansionist." ]
The bombardon does not scowl if it is not expansionist.
the bombardon is not expansionist.
the underwriter recommends bombardon and does not scowl.
sent1: if the bombardon does not recommend bombardon then that the underwriter scowls and does recommend bombardon is not correct. sent2: the bombardon is not expansionist if it does not recommend bombardon. sent3: that the bombardon suffers mothball does not hold. sent4: the bombardon is not a vizier. sent5: if that the bangle is not pyemic but expansionist does not hold the bombardon is expansionist. sent6: that that the underwriter scowls but it does not recommend bombardon is not true is true if the bombardon does not recommend bombardon. sent7: that the underwriter does recommend bombardon and it does scowl does not hold. sent8: if the fact that something is not a kind of a Aalto and is a kind of a salience is false it does not striate. sent9: the fact that the underwriter does recommend bombardon and does not scowl is incorrect if the bombardon does not scowl. sent10: the underwriter recommends bombardon but it does not scowl if the bombardon is expansionist. sent11: if the underwriter is not expansionist it does not scowl. sent12: that the underwriter is expansionist and does not scowl is wrong. sent13: if the underwriter does not scowl then that the fact that the bombardon recommends bombardon and does not scowl is not true is right. sent14: the fact that the nebuchadnezzar is not a Aalto but it is a kind of a salience is not correct. sent15: the underwriter is not expansionist. sent16: if something does nick the fact that it is non-pyemic thing that is expansionist is incorrect. sent17: if the bombardon is not expansionist then it does not scowl. sent18: if the bombardon does not scowl then the fact that the underwriter does recommend bombardon and it does scowl does not hold. sent19: the bombardon does not recommend gillie. sent20: the bombardon is not expansionist.
({D}{b} & ¬{B}{b})
sent1: ¬{D}{a} -> ¬({B}{b} & {D}{b}) sent2: ¬{D}{a} -> ¬{A}{a} sent3: ¬{IH}{a} sent4: ¬{GO}{a} sent5: ¬(¬{C}{c} & {A}{c}) -> {A}{a} sent6: ¬{D}{a} -> ¬({B}{b} & ¬{D}{b}) sent7: ¬({D}{b} & {B}{b}) sent8: (x): ¬(¬{H}x & {I}x) -> ¬{F}x sent9: ¬{B}{a} -> ¬({D}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) sent10: {A}{a} -> ({D}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) sent11: ¬{A}{b} -> ¬{B}{b} sent12: ¬({A}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) sent13: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬({D}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) sent14: ¬(¬{H}{e} & {I}{e}) sent15: ¬{A}{b} sent16: (x): {E}x -> ¬(¬{C}x & {A}x) sent17: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{B}{a} sent18: ¬{B}{a} -> ¬({D}{b} & {B}{b}) sent19: ¬{EQ}{a} sent20: ¬{A}{a}
[ "sent17 & sent20 -> int1: the bombardon does not scowl.; sent9 & int1 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
[ "sent17 & sent20 -> int1: ¬{B}{a}; sent9 & int1 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
2
2
17
0
17
the underwriter recommends bombardon but it does not scowl.
({D}{b} & ¬{B}{b})
9
[ "sent16 -> int2: the fact that the bangle is not pyemic but it is expansionist does not hold if it does nick.; sent8 -> int3: if the fact that the nebuchadnezzar is not a Aalto and is a salience is wrong then it is not striate.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: the nebuchadnezzar does not striate.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that it is not striate.;" ]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the underwriter recommends bombardon and does not scowl. ; $context$ = sent1: if the bombardon does not recommend bombardon then that the underwriter scowls and does recommend bombardon is not correct. sent2: the bombardon is not expansionist if it does not recommend bombardon. sent3: that the bombardon suffers mothball does not hold. sent4: the bombardon is not a vizier. sent5: if that the bangle is not pyemic but expansionist does not hold the bombardon is expansionist. sent6: that that the underwriter scowls but it does not recommend bombardon is not true is true if the bombardon does not recommend bombardon. sent7: that the underwriter does recommend bombardon and it does scowl does not hold. sent8: if the fact that something is not a kind of a Aalto and is a kind of a salience is false it does not striate. sent9: the fact that the underwriter does recommend bombardon and does not scowl is incorrect if the bombardon does not scowl. sent10: the underwriter recommends bombardon but it does not scowl if the bombardon is expansionist. sent11: if the underwriter is not expansionist it does not scowl. sent12: that the underwriter is expansionist and does not scowl is wrong. sent13: if the underwriter does not scowl then that the fact that the bombardon recommends bombardon and does not scowl is not true is right. sent14: the fact that the nebuchadnezzar is not a Aalto but it is a kind of a salience is not correct. sent15: the underwriter is not expansionist. sent16: if something does nick the fact that it is non-pyemic thing that is expansionist is incorrect. sent17: if the bombardon is not expansionist then it does not scowl. sent18: if the bombardon does not scowl then the fact that the underwriter does recommend bombardon and it does scowl does not hold. sent19: the bombardon does not recommend gillie. sent20: the bombardon is not expansionist. ; $proof$ =
sent17 & sent20 -> int1: the bombardon does not scowl.; sent9 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
DeductionInstance
if the bombardon is not expansionist then it does not scowl.
[ "the bombardon is not expansionist.", "the fact that the underwriter does recommend bombardon and does not scowl is incorrect if the bombardon does not scowl." ]
[ "The bombardon does not scowl if it is not expansionist.", "The bombardon doesn't scowl if it's not expansionist." ]
The bombardon doesn't scowl if it's not expansionist.
the fact that the underwriter does recommend bombardon and does not scowl is incorrect if the bombardon does not scowl.
the fact that the inconstantness does not occur and the summarizing does not occur is incorrect.
sent1: if the recommending Kepler does not occur the fact that the landfall and the imbuing occurs is not true. sent2: the repositioning Kesey does not occur if that not the meteor but the untranslatableness happens is not correct. sent3: the recommending hadron and the Ugandan happens if the repositioning Kesey does not occur. sent4: if the fact that both the landfall and the imbuing occurs is false the imbuing does not occur. sent5: if the recommending hadron happens then the fact that the inconstantness does not occur and the summarizing does not occur is not correct. sent6: if the fact that the catapulticness does not occur hold then the Aeolianness and the insubordination happens. sent7: if the recommending lying does not occur then the extortion does not occur and/or the formalness does not occur. sent8: the fact that that not the meteor but the untranslatableness happens is not correct is not incorrect if the insubordination happens. sent9: the puppetry does not occur if the recommending hadron does not occur. sent10: if that the recommending hadron does not occur is right then that the puppetry or the cholecystectomy or both happens is incorrect. sent11: the summarizing does not occur if the fact that that both the non-Ugandanness and the repositioning Kesey happens is not right is not wrong. sent12: the recommending lying does not occur and the recommending arroyo does not occur if the imbuing does not occur. sent13: the bacteremicness does not occur if the fact that the bacteremicness but not the cholecystectomy happens is incorrect. sent14: that both the non-Ugandanness and the repositioning Kesey occurs does not hold. sent15: the unreliableness does not occur. sent16: if the hydrocephalicness happens then that not the overstraining but the recommending Kepler happens is incorrect. sent17: if the fact that the overstraining does not occur and the recommending Kepler happens does not hold the fact that the recommending Kepler does not occur is not wrong. sent18: if the bacteremicness does not occur then that the hydrocephalicness occurs and the boom occurs hold. sent19: if that the puppetry and/or the cholecystectomy occurs does not hold then the inconstantness does not occur. sent20: the recommending hadron does not occur.
¬(¬{B} & ¬{C})
sent1: ¬{P} -> ¬({Q} & {O}) sent2: ¬(¬{F} & {G}) -> ¬{E} sent3: ¬{E} -> ({A} & {D}) sent4: ¬({Q} & {O}) -> ¬{O} sent5: {A} -> ¬(¬{B} & ¬{C}) sent6: ¬{J} -> ({I} & {H}) sent7: ¬{M} -> (¬{K} v ¬{L}) sent8: {H} -> ¬(¬{F} & {G}) sent9: ¬{A} -> ¬{AA} sent10: ¬{A} -> ¬({AA} v {AB}) sent11: ¬(¬{D} & {E}) -> ¬{C} sent12: ¬{O} -> (¬{M} & ¬{N}) sent13: ¬({U} & ¬{AB}) -> ¬{U} sent14: ¬(¬{D} & {E}) sent15: ¬{DT} sent16: {S} -> ¬(¬{R} & {P}) sent17: ¬(¬{R} & {P}) -> ¬{P} sent18: ¬{U} -> ({S} & {T}) sent19: ¬({AA} v {AB}) -> ¬{B} sent20: ¬{A}
[ "sent10 & sent20 -> int1: that either the puppetry happens or the cholecystectomy happens or both is false.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the inconstantness does not occur.; sent11 & sent14 -> int3: the summarizing does not occur.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
[ "sent10 & sent20 -> int1: ¬({AA} v {AB}); int1 & sent19 -> int2: ¬{B}; sent11 & sent14 -> int3: ¬{C}; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
3
3
15
0
15
the fact that the inconstantness does not occur and the summarizing does not occur is not correct.
¬(¬{B} & ¬{C})
18
[]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the inconstantness does not occur and the summarizing does not occur is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the recommending Kepler does not occur the fact that the landfall and the imbuing occurs is not true. sent2: the repositioning Kesey does not occur if that not the meteor but the untranslatableness happens is not correct. sent3: the recommending hadron and the Ugandan happens if the repositioning Kesey does not occur. sent4: if the fact that both the landfall and the imbuing occurs is false the imbuing does not occur. sent5: if the recommending hadron happens then the fact that the inconstantness does not occur and the summarizing does not occur is not correct. sent6: if the fact that the catapulticness does not occur hold then the Aeolianness and the insubordination happens. sent7: if the recommending lying does not occur then the extortion does not occur and/or the formalness does not occur. sent8: the fact that that not the meteor but the untranslatableness happens is not correct is not incorrect if the insubordination happens. sent9: the puppetry does not occur if the recommending hadron does not occur. sent10: if that the recommending hadron does not occur is right then that the puppetry or the cholecystectomy or both happens is incorrect. sent11: the summarizing does not occur if the fact that that both the non-Ugandanness and the repositioning Kesey happens is not right is not wrong. sent12: the recommending lying does not occur and the recommending arroyo does not occur if the imbuing does not occur. sent13: the bacteremicness does not occur if the fact that the bacteremicness but not the cholecystectomy happens is incorrect. sent14: that both the non-Ugandanness and the repositioning Kesey occurs does not hold. sent15: the unreliableness does not occur. sent16: if the hydrocephalicness happens then that not the overstraining but the recommending Kepler happens is incorrect. sent17: if the fact that the overstraining does not occur and the recommending Kepler happens does not hold the fact that the recommending Kepler does not occur is not wrong. sent18: if the bacteremicness does not occur then that the hydrocephalicness occurs and the boom occurs hold. sent19: if that the puppetry and/or the cholecystectomy occurs does not hold then the inconstantness does not occur. sent20: the recommending hadron does not occur. ; $proof$ =
sent10 & sent20 -> int1: that either the puppetry happens or the cholecystectomy happens or both is false.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the inconstantness does not occur.; sent11 & sent14 -> int3: the summarizing does not occur.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
DeductionInstance
if that the recommending hadron does not occur is right then that the puppetry or the cholecystectomy or both happens is incorrect.
[ "the recommending hadron does not occur.", "if that the puppetry and/or the cholecystectomy occurs does not hold then the inconstantness does not occur.", "the summarizing does not occur if the fact that that both the non-Ugandanness and the repositioning Kesey happens is not right is not wrong.", "that both the non-Ugandanness and the repositioning Kesey occurs does not hold." ]
[ "The recommended 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846", "If the recommended 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846", "The recommended 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846", "The recommended 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846" ]
The recommended 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846
the recommending hadron does not occur.
the fact that the inconstantness does not occur and the summarizing does not occur is incorrect.
sent1: if the recommending Kepler does not occur the fact that the landfall and the imbuing occurs is not true. sent2: the repositioning Kesey does not occur if that not the meteor but the untranslatableness happens is not correct. sent3: the recommending hadron and the Ugandan happens if the repositioning Kesey does not occur. sent4: if the fact that both the landfall and the imbuing occurs is false the imbuing does not occur. sent5: if the recommending hadron happens then the fact that the inconstantness does not occur and the summarizing does not occur is not correct. sent6: if the fact that the catapulticness does not occur hold then the Aeolianness and the insubordination happens. sent7: if the recommending lying does not occur then the extortion does not occur and/or the formalness does not occur. sent8: the fact that that not the meteor but the untranslatableness happens is not correct is not incorrect if the insubordination happens. sent9: the puppetry does not occur if the recommending hadron does not occur. sent10: if that the recommending hadron does not occur is right then that the puppetry or the cholecystectomy or both happens is incorrect. sent11: the summarizing does not occur if the fact that that both the non-Ugandanness and the repositioning Kesey happens is not right is not wrong. sent12: the recommending lying does not occur and the recommending arroyo does not occur if the imbuing does not occur. sent13: the bacteremicness does not occur if the fact that the bacteremicness but not the cholecystectomy happens is incorrect. sent14: that both the non-Ugandanness and the repositioning Kesey occurs does not hold. sent15: the unreliableness does not occur. sent16: if the hydrocephalicness happens then that not the overstraining but the recommending Kepler happens is incorrect. sent17: if the fact that the overstraining does not occur and the recommending Kepler happens does not hold the fact that the recommending Kepler does not occur is not wrong. sent18: if the bacteremicness does not occur then that the hydrocephalicness occurs and the boom occurs hold. sent19: if that the puppetry and/or the cholecystectomy occurs does not hold then the inconstantness does not occur. sent20: the recommending hadron does not occur.
¬(¬{B} & ¬{C})
sent1: ¬{P} -> ¬({Q} & {O}) sent2: ¬(¬{F} & {G}) -> ¬{E} sent3: ¬{E} -> ({A} & {D}) sent4: ¬({Q} & {O}) -> ¬{O} sent5: {A} -> ¬(¬{B} & ¬{C}) sent6: ¬{J} -> ({I} & {H}) sent7: ¬{M} -> (¬{K} v ¬{L}) sent8: {H} -> ¬(¬{F} & {G}) sent9: ¬{A} -> ¬{AA} sent10: ¬{A} -> ¬({AA} v {AB}) sent11: ¬(¬{D} & {E}) -> ¬{C} sent12: ¬{O} -> (¬{M} & ¬{N}) sent13: ¬({U} & ¬{AB}) -> ¬{U} sent14: ¬(¬{D} & {E}) sent15: ¬{DT} sent16: {S} -> ¬(¬{R} & {P}) sent17: ¬(¬{R} & {P}) -> ¬{P} sent18: ¬{U} -> ({S} & {T}) sent19: ¬({AA} v {AB}) -> ¬{B} sent20: ¬{A}
[ "sent10 & sent20 -> int1: that either the puppetry happens or the cholecystectomy happens or both is false.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the inconstantness does not occur.; sent11 & sent14 -> int3: the summarizing does not occur.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
[ "sent10 & sent20 -> int1: ¬({AA} v {AB}); int1 & sent19 -> int2: ¬{B}; sent11 & sent14 -> int3: ¬{C}; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
3
3
15
0
15
the fact that the inconstantness does not occur and the summarizing does not occur is not correct.
¬(¬{B} & ¬{C})
18
[]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the inconstantness does not occur and the summarizing does not occur is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the recommending Kepler does not occur the fact that the landfall and the imbuing occurs is not true. sent2: the repositioning Kesey does not occur if that not the meteor but the untranslatableness happens is not correct. sent3: the recommending hadron and the Ugandan happens if the repositioning Kesey does not occur. sent4: if the fact that both the landfall and the imbuing occurs is false the imbuing does not occur. sent5: if the recommending hadron happens then the fact that the inconstantness does not occur and the summarizing does not occur is not correct. sent6: if the fact that the catapulticness does not occur hold then the Aeolianness and the insubordination happens. sent7: if the recommending lying does not occur then the extortion does not occur and/or the formalness does not occur. sent8: the fact that that not the meteor but the untranslatableness happens is not correct is not incorrect if the insubordination happens. sent9: the puppetry does not occur if the recommending hadron does not occur. sent10: if that the recommending hadron does not occur is right then that the puppetry or the cholecystectomy or both happens is incorrect. sent11: the summarizing does not occur if the fact that that both the non-Ugandanness and the repositioning Kesey happens is not right is not wrong. sent12: the recommending lying does not occur and the recommending arroyo does not occur if the imbuing does not occur. sent13: the bacteremicness does not occur if the fact that the bacteremicness but not the cholecystectomy happens is incorrect. sent14: that both the non-Ugandanness and the repositioning Kesey occurs does not hold. sent15: the unreliableness does not occur. sent16: if the hydrocephalicness happens then that not the overstraining but the recommending Kepler happens is incorrect. sent17: if the fact that the overstraining does not occur and the recommending Kepler happens does not hold the fact that the recommending Kepler does not occur is not wrong. sent18: if the bacteremicness does not occur then that the hydrocephalicness occurs and the boom occurs hold. sent19: if that the puppetry and/or the cholecystectomy occurs does not hold then the inconstantness does not occur. sent20: the recommending hadron does not occur. ; $proof$ =
sent10 & sent20 -> int1: that either the puppetry happens or the cholecystectomy happens or both is false.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the inconstantness does not occur.; sent11 & sent14 -> int3: the summarizing does not occur.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
DeductionInstance
if that the recommending hadron does not occur is right then that the puppetry or the cholecystectomy or both happens is incorrect.
[ "the recommending hadron does not occur.", "if that the puppetry and/or the cholecystectomy occurs does not hold then the inconstantness does not occur.", "the summarizing does not occur if the fact that that both the non-Ugandanness and the repositioning Kesey happens is not right is not wrong.", "that both the non-Ugandanness and the repositioning Kesey occurs does not hold." ]
[ "The recommended 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846", "If the recommended 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846", "The recommended 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846", "The recommended 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846" ]
If the recommended 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846
if that the puppetry and/or the cholecystectomy occurs does not hold then the inconstantness does not occur.
the fact that the inconstantness does not occur and the summarizing does not occur is incorrect.
sent1: if the recommending Kepler does not occur the fact that the landfall and the imbuing occurs is not true. sent2: the repositioning Kesey does not occur if that not the meteor but the untranslatableness happens is not correct. sent3: the recommending hadron and the Ugandan happens if the repositioning Kesey does not occur. sent4: if the fact that both the landfall and the imbuing occurs is false the imbuing does not occur. sent5: if the recommending hadron happens then the fact that the inconstantness does not occur and the summarizing does not occur is not correct. sent6: if the fact that the catapulticness does not occur hold then the Aeolianness and the insubordination happens. sent7: if the recommending lying does not occur then the extortion does not occur and/or the formalness does not occur. sent8: the fact that that not the meteor but the untranslatableness happens is not correct is not incorrect if the insubordination happens. sent9: the puppetry does not occur if the recommending hadron does not occur. sent10: if that the recommending hadron does not occur is right then that the puppetry or the cholecystectomy or both happens is incorrect. sent11: the summarizing does not occur if the fact that that both the non-Ugandanness and the repositioning Kesey happens is not right is not wrong. sent12: the recommending lying does not occur and the recommending arroyo does not occur if the imbuing does not occur. sent13: the bacteremicness does not occur if the fact that the bacteremicness but not the cholecystectomy happens is incorrect. sent14: that both the non-Ugandanness and the repositioning Kesey occurs does not hold. sent15: the unreliableness does not occur. sent16: if the hydrocephalicness happens then that not the overstraining but the recommending Kepler happens is incorrect. sent17: if the fact that the overstraining does not occur and the recommending Kepler happens does not hold the fact that the recommending Kepler does not occur is not wrong. sent18: if the bacteremicness does not occur then that the hydrocephalicness occurs and the boom occurs hold. sent19: if that the puppetry and/or the cholecystectomy occurs does not hold then the inconstantness does not occur. sent20: the recommending hadron does not occur.
¬(¬{B} & ¬{C})
sent1: ¬{P} -> ¬({Q} & {O}) sent2: ¬(¬{F} & {G}) -> ¬{E} sent3: ¬{E} -> ({A} & {D}) sent4: ¬({Q} & {O}) -> ¬{O} sent5: {A} -> ¬(¬{B} & ¬{C}) sent6: ¬{J} -> ({I} & {H}) sent7: ¬{M} -> (¬{K} v ¬{L}) sent8: {H} -> ¬(¬{F} & {G}) sent9: ¬{A} -> ¬{AA} sent10: ¬{A} -> ¬({AA} v {AB}) sent11: ¬(¬{D} & {E}) -> ¬{C} sent12: ¬{O} -> (¬{M} & ¬{N}) sent13: ¬({U} & ¬{AB}) -> ¬{U} sent14: ¬(¬{D} & {E}) sent15: ¬{DT} sent16: {S} -> ¬(¬{R} & {P}) sent17: ¬(¬{R} & {P}) -> ¬{P} sent18: ¬{U} -> ({S} & {T}) sent19: ¬({AA} v {AB}) -> ¬{B} sent20: ¬{A}
[ "sent10 & sent20 -> int1: that either the puppetry happens or the cholecystectomy happens or both is false.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the inconstantness does not occur.; sent11 & sent14 -> int3: the summarizing does not occur.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
[ "sent10 & sent20 -> int1: ¬({AA} v {AB}); int1 & sent19 -> int2: ¬{B}; sent11 & sent14 -> int3: ¬{C}; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
3
3
15
0
15
the fact that the inconstantness does not occur and the summarizing does not occur is not correct.
¬(¬{B} & ¬{C})
18
[]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the inconstantness does not occur and the summarizing does not occur is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the recommending Kepler does not occur the fact that the landfall and the imbuing occurs is not true. sent2: the repositioning Kesey does not occur if that not the meteor but the untranslatableness happens is not correct. sent3: the recommending hadron and the Ugandan happens if the repositioning Kesey does not occur. sent4: if the fact that both the landfall and the imbuing occurs is false the imbuing does not occur. sent5: if the recommending hadron happens then the fact that the inconstantness does not occur and the summarizing does not occur is not correct. sent6: if the fact that the catapulticness does not occur hold then the Aeolianness and the insubordination happens. sent7: if the recommending lying does not occur then the extortion does not occur and/or the formalness does not occur. sent8: the fact that that not the meteor but the untranslatableness happens is not correct is not incorrect if the insubordination happens. sent9: the puppetry does not occur if the recommending hadron does not occur. sent10: if that the recommending hadron does not occur is right then that the puppetry or the cholecystectomy or both happens is incorrect. sent11: the summarizing does not occur if the fact that that both the non-Ugandanness and the repositioning Kesey happens is not right is not wrong. sent12: the recommending lying does not occur and the recommending arroyo does not occur if the imbuing does not occur. sent13: the bacteremicness does not occur if the fact that the bacteremicness but not the cholecystectomy happens is incorrect. sent14: that both the non-Ugandanness and the repositioning Kesey occurs does not hold. sent15: the unreliableness does not occur. sent16: if the hydrocephalicness happens then that not the overstraining but the recommending Kepler happens is incorrect. sent17: if the fact that the overstraining does not occur and the recommending Kepler happens does not hold the fact that the recommending Kepler does not occur is not wrong. sent18: if the bacteremicness does not occur then that the hydrocephalicness occurs and the boom occurs hold. sent19: if that the puppetry and/or the cholecystectomy occurs does not hold then the inconstantness does not occur. sent20: the recommending hadron does not occur. ; $proof$ =
sent10 & sent20 -> int1: that either the puppetry happens or the cholecystectomy happens or both is false.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the inconstantness does not occur.; sent11 & sent14 -> int3: the summarizing does not occur.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
DeductionInstance
if that the recommending hadron does not occur is right then that the puppetry or the cholecystectomy or both happens is incorrect.
[ "the recommending hadron does not occur.", "if that the puppetry and/or the cholecystectomy occurs does not hold then the inconstantness does not occur.", "the summarizing does not occur if the fact that that both the non-Ugandanness and the repositioning Kesey happens is not right is not wrong.", "that both the non-Ugandanness and the repositioning Kesey occurs does not hold." ]
[ "The recommended 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846", "If the recommended 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846", "The recommended 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846", "The recommended 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846" ]
The recommended 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846
the summarizing does not occur if the fact that that both the non-Ugandanness and the repositioning Kesey happens is not right is not wrong.
the fact that the inconstantness does not occur and the summarizing does not occur is incorrect.
sent1: if the recommending Kepler does not occur the fact that the landfall and the imbuing occurs is not true. sent2: the repositioning Kesey does not occur if that not the meteor but the untranslatableness happens is not correct. sent3: the recommending hadron and the Ugandan happens if the repositioning Kesey does not occur. sent4: if the fact that both the landfall and the imbuing occurs is false the imbuing does not occur. sent5: if the recommending hadron happens then the fact that the inconstantness does not occur and the summarizing does not occur is not correct. sent6: if the fact that the catapulticness does not occur hold then the Aeolianness and the insubordination happens. sent7: if the recommending lying does not occur then the extortion does not occur and/or the formalness does not occur. sent8: the fact that that not the meteor but the untranslatableness happens is not correct is not incorrect if the insubordination happens. sent9: the puppetry does not occur if the recommending hadron does not occur. sent10: if that the recommending hadron does not occur is right then that the puppetry or the cholecystectomy or both happens is incorrect. sent11: the summarizing does not occur if the fact that that both the non-Ugandanness and the repositioning Kesey happens is not right is not wrong. sent12: the recommending lying does not occur and the recommending arroyo does not occur if the imbuing does not occur. sent13: the bacteremicness does not occur if the fact that the bacteremicness but not the cholecystectomy happens is incorrect. sent14: that both the non-Ugandanness and the repositioning Kesey occurs does not hold. sent15: the unreliableness does not occur. sent16: if the hydrocephalicness happens then that not the overstraining but the recommending Kepler happens is incorrect. sent17: if the fact that the overstraining does not occur and the recommending Kepler happens does not hold the fact that the recommending Kepler does not occur is not wrong. sent18: if the bacteremicness does not occur then that the hydrocephalicness occurs and the boom occurs hold. sent19: if that the puppetry and/or the cholecystectomy occurs does not hold then the inconstantness does not occur. sent20: the recommending hadron does not occur.
¬(¬{B} & ¬{C})
sent1: ¬{P} -> ¬({Q} & {O}) sent2: ¬(¬{F} & {G}) -> ¬{E} sent3: ¬{E} -> ({A} & {D}) sent4: ¬({Q} & {O}) -> ¬{O} sent5: {A} -> ¬(¬{B} & ¬{C}) sent6: ¬{J} -> ({I} & {H}) sent7: ¬{M} -> (¬{K} v ¬{L}) sent8: {H} -> ¬(¬{F} & {G}) sent9: ¬{A} -> ¬{AA} sent10: ¬{A} -> ¬({AA} v {AB}) sent11: ¬(¬{D} & {E}) -> ¬{C} sent12: ¬{O} -> (¬{M} & ¬{N}) sent13: ¬({U} & ¬{AB}) -> ¬{U} sent14: ¬(¬{D} & {E}) sent15: ¬{DT} sent16: {S} -> ¬(¬{R} & {P}) sent17: ¬(¬{R} & {P}) -> ¬{P} sent18: ¬{U} -> ({S} & {T}) sent19: ¬({AA} v {AB}) -> ¬{B} sent20: ¬{A}
[ "sent10 & sent20 -> int1: that either the puppetry happens or the cholecystectomy happens or both is false.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the inconstantness does not occur.; sent11 & sent14 -> int3: the summarizing does not occur.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
[ "sent10 & sent20 -> int1: ¬({AA} v {AB}); int1 & sent19 -> int2: ¬{B}; sent11 & sent14 -> int3: ¬{C}; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
3
3
15
0
15
the fact that the inconstantness does not occur and the summarizing does not occur is not correct.
¬(¬{B} & ¬{C})
18
[]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the inconstantness does not occur and the summarizing does not occur is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the recommending Kepler does not occur the fact that the landfall and the imbuing occurs is not true. sent2: the repositioning Kesey does not occur if that not the meteor but the untranslatableness happens is not correct. sent3: the recommending hadron and the Ugandan happens if the repositioning Kesey does not occur. sent4: if the fact that both the landfall and the imbuing occurs is false the imbuing does not occur. sent5: if the recommending hadron happens then the fact that the inconstantness does not occur and the summarizing does not occur is not correct. sent6: if the fact that the catapulticness does not occur hold then the Aeolianness and the insubordination happens. sent7: if the recommending lying does not occur then the extortion does not occur and/or the formalness does not occur. sent8: the fact that that not the meteor but the untranslatableness happens is not correct is not incorrect if the insubordination happens. sent9: the puppetry does not occur if the recommending hadron does not occur. sent10: if that the recommending hadron does not occur is right then that the puppetry or the cholecystectomy or both happens is incorrect. sent11: the summarizing does not occur if the fact that that both the non-Ugandanness and the repositioning Kesey happens is not right is not wrong. sent12: the recommending lying does not occur and the recommending arroyo does not occur if the imbuing does not occur. sent13: the bacteremicness does not occur if the fact that the bacteremicness but not the cholecystectomy happens is incorrect. sent14: that both the non-Ugandanness and the repositioning Kesey occurs does not hold. sent15: the unreliableness does not occur. sent16: if the hydrocephalicness happens then that not the overstraining but the recommending Kepler happens is incorrect. sent17: if the fact that the overstraining does not occur and the recommending Kepler happens does not hold the fact that the recommending Kepler does not occur is not wrong. sent18: if the bacteremicness does not occur then that the hydrocephalicness occurs and the boom occurs hold. sent19: if that the puppetry and/or the cholecystectomy occurs does not hold then the inconstantness does not occur. sent20: the recommending hadron does not occur. ; $proof$ =
sent10 & sent20 -> int1: that either the puppetry happens or the cholecystectomy happens or both is false.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the inconstantness does not occur.; sent11 & sent14 -> int3: the summarizing does not occur.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
DeductionInstance
if that the recommending hadron does not occur is right then that the puppetry or the cholecystectomy or both happens is incorrect.
[ "the recommending hadron does not occur.", "if that the puppetry and/or the cholecystectomy occurs does not hold then the inconstantness does not occur.", "the summarizing does not occur if the fact that that both the non-Ugandanness and the repositioning Kesey happens is not right is not wrong.", "that both the non-Ugandanness and the repositioning Kesey occurs does not hold." ]
[ "The recommended 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846", "If the recommended 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846", "The recommended 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846", "The recommended 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846" ]
The recommended 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846 888-666-1846
that both the non-Ugandanness and the repositioning Kesey occurs does not hold.
the stacte is not a stubbornness.
sent1: if the burthen is camphoric then the piperacillin is camphoric. sent2: the stacte does recommend onrush. sent3: something is not a kind of a stubbornness if the fact that it is not non-chondritic but incorporeal is incorrect. sent4: if the fact that the piperacillin does reposition oxalis is true the stacte is a stubbornness. sent5: that the piperacillin is not corporeal and it does not reposition oxalis is not true if there exists something such that it is chondritic. sent6: that the oxalis does not reposition denomination and does not direct is not right. sent7: if there is something such that it is a Pashto the warrener is not unawares. sent8: if the fact that something does not recommend piperacillin and does not reposition hyperextension is wrong then it does not reposition oxalis. sent9: the piperacillin is camphoric if the burthen is a balkline. sent10: there is something such that it is chondritic. sent11: the piperacillin is corporeal if the stacte does reposition oxalis. sent12: if the fact that the stacte is not a stubbornness and does not reposition oxalis does not hold then the piperacillin is corporeal. sent13: if the piperacillin is camphoric the fact that it does not recommend piperacillin and does not reposition hyperextension is wrong. sent14: the fact that the piperacillin does not recommend voluntary and is not a farina is false. sent15: the stacte is a stubbornness if that the piperacillin is not corporeal and does not reposition oxalis does not hold. sent16: if there is something such that the fact that it does not reposition denomination and does not direct is not correct then the hull is a Pashto. sent17: the burthen is camphoric and/or is a balkline if there are non-unawares things. sent18: if the stacte is corporeal the piperacillin is a kind of a stubbornness. sent19: the stacte is a deliberation.
¬{D}{b}
sent1: {G}{c} -> {G}{a} sent2: {AD}{b} sent3: (x): ¬({A}x & ¬{B}x) -> ¬{D}x sent4: {C}{a} -> {D}{b} sent5: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent6: ¬(¬{K}{f} & ¬{L}{f}) sent7: (x): {J}x -> ¬{H}{d} sent8: (x): ¬(¬{F}x & ¬{E}x) -> ¬{C}x sent9: {I}{c} -> {G}{a} sent10: (Ex): {A}x sent11: {C}{b} -> {B}{a} sent12: ¬(¬{D}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) -> {B}{a} sent13: {G}{a} -> ¬(¬{F}{a} & ¬{E}{a}) sent14: ¬(¬{AO}{a} & ¬{FH}{a}) sent15: ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> {D}{b} sent16: (x): ¬(¬{K}x & ¬{L}x) -> {J}{e} sent17: (x): ¬{H}x -> ({G}{c} v {I}{c}) sent18: {B}{b} -> {D}{a} sent19: {AC}{b}
[ "sent10 & sent5 -> int1: the fact that the piperacillin is not corporeal and does not reposition oxalis is not right.; sent15 & int1 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
[ "sent10 & sent5 -> int1: ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}); sent15 & int1 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
2
2
16
0
16
the stacte is not a stubbornness.
¬{D}{b}
12
[ "sent3 -> int2: the stacte is not a stubbornness if that it is both chondritic and incorporeal is not right.; sent8 -> int3: the piperacillin does not reposition oxalis if that it does not recommend piperacillin and it does not reposition hyperextension is wrong.; sent6 -> int4: there exists something such that that it does not reposition denomination and is not directed is not true.; int4 & sent16 -> int5: the hull is a kind of a Pashto.; int5 -> int6: the fact that there exists something such that it is a Pashto is not false.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the warrener is not unawares.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it is not unawares.; int8 & sent17 -> int9: the burthen is camphoric and/or it is a balkline.; int9 & sent1 & sent9 -> int10: the piperacillin is camphoric.; sent13 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the piperacillin does not recommend piperacillin and it does not reposition hyperextension is incorrect.; int3 & int11 -> int12: the fact that the piperacillin does not reposition oxalis is not incorrect.; int12 -> int13: there is something such that it does not reposition oxalis.;" ]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the stacte is not a stubbornness. ; $context$ = sent1: if the burthen is camphoric then the piperacillin is camphoric. sent2: the stacte does recommend onrush. sent3: something is not a kind of a stubbornness if the fact that it is not non-chondritic but incorporeal is incorrect. sent4: if the fact that the piperacillin does reposition oxalis is true the stacte is a stubbornness. sent5: that the piperacillin is not corporeal and it does not reposition oxalis is not true if there exists something such that it is chondritic. sent6: that the oxalis does not reposition denomination and does not direct is not right. sent7: if there is something such that it is a Pashto the warrener is not unawares. sent8: if the fact that something does not recommend piperacillin and does not reposition hyperextension is wrong then it does not reposition oxalis. sent9: the piperacillin is camphoric if the burthen is a balkline. sent10: there is something such that it is chondritic. sent11: the piperacillin is corporeal if the stacte does reposition oxalis. sent12: if the fact that the stacte is not a stubbornness and does not reposition oxalis does not hold then the piperacillin is corporeal. sent13: if the piperacillin is camphoric the fact that it does not recommend piperacillin and does not reposition hyperextension is wrong. sent14: the fact that the piperacillin does not recommend voluntary and is not a farina is false. sent15: the stacte is a stubbornness if that the piperacillin is not corporeal and does not reposition oxalis does not hold. sent16: if there is something such that the fact that it does not reposition denomination and does not direct is not correct then the hull is a Pashto. sent17: the burthen is camphoric and/or is a balkline if there are non-unawares things. sent18: if the stacte is corporeal the piperacillin is a kind of a stubbornness. sent19: the stacte is a deliberation. ; $proof$ =
sent10 & sent5 -> int1: the fact that the piperacillin is not corporeal and does not reposition oxalis is not right.; sent15 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
DeductionInstance
there is something such that it is chondritic.
[ "that the piperacillin is not corporeal and it does not reposition oxalis is not true if there exists something such that it is chondritic.", "the stacte is a stubbornness if that the piperacillin is not corporeal and does not reposition oxalis does not hold." ]
[ "There is something that makes it seem like it ischondritic.", "There is something that ischondritic." ]
There is something that makes it seem like it ischondritic.
that the piperacillin is not corporeal and it does not reposition oxalis is not true if there exists something such that it is chondritic.
the stacte is not a stubbornness.
sent1: if the burthen is camphoric then the piperacillin is camphoric. sent2: the stacte does recommend onrush. sent3: something is not a kind of a stubbornness if the fact that it is not non-chondritic but incorporeal is incorrect. sent4: if the fact that the piperacillin does reposition oxalis is true the stacte is a stubbornness. sent5: that the piperacillin is not corporeal and it does not reposition oxalis is not true if there exists something such that it is chondritic. sent6: that the oxalis does not reposition denomination and does not direct is not right. sent7: if there is something such that it is a Pashto the warrener is not unawares. sent8: if the fact that something does not recommend piperacillin and does not reposition hyperextension is wrong then it does not reposition oxalis. sent9: the piperacillin is camphoric if the burthen is a balkline. sent10: there is something such that it is chondritic. sent11: the piperacillin is corporeal if the stacte does reposition oxalis. sent12: if the fact that the stacte is not a stubbornness and does not reposition oxalis does not hold then the piperacillin is corporeal. sent13: if the piperacillin is camphoric the fact that it does not recommend piperacillin and does not reposition hyperextension is wrong. sent14: the fact that the piperacillin does not recommend voluntary and is not a farina is false. sent15: the stacte is a stubbornness if that the piperacillin is not corporeal and does not reposition oxalis does not hold. sent16: if there is something such that the fact that it does not reposition denomination and does not direct is not correct then the hull is a Pashto. sent17: the burthen is camphoric and/or is a balkline if there are non-unawares things. sent18: if the stacte is corporeal the piperacillin is a kind of a stubbornness. sent19: the stacte is a deliberation.
¬{D}{b}
sent1: {G}{c} -> {G}{a} sent2: {AD}{b} sent3: (x): ¬({A}x & ¬{B}x) -> ¬{D}x sent4: {C}{a} -> {D}{b} sent5: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent6: ¬(¬{K}{f} & ¬{L}{f}) sent7: (x): {J}x -> ¬{H}{d} sent8: (x): ¬(¬{F}x & ¬{E}x) -> ¬{C}x sent9: {I}{c} -> {G}{a} sent10: (Ex): {A}x sent11: {C}{b} -> {B}{a} sent12: ¬(¬{D}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) -> {B}{a} sent13: {G}{a} -> ¬(¬{F}{a} & ¬{E}{a}) sent14: ¬(¬{AO}{a} & ¬{FH}{a}) sent15: ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> {D}{b} sent16: (x): ¬(¬{K}x & ¬{L}x) -> {J}{e} sent17: (x): ¬{H}x -> ({G}{c} v {I}{c}) sent18: {B}{b} -> {D}{a} sent19: {AC}{b}
[ "sent10 & sent5 -> int1: the fact that the piperacillin is not corporeal and does not reposition oxalis is not right.; sent15 & int1 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
[ "sent10 & sent5 -> int1: ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}); sent15 & int1 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
2
2
16
0
16
the stacte is not a stubbornness.
¬{D}{b}
12
[ "sent3 -> int2: the stacte is not a stubbornness if that it is both chondritic and incorporeal is not right.; sent8 -> int3: the piperacillin does not reposition oxalis if that it does not recommend piperacillin and it does not reposition hyperextension is wrong.; sent6 -> int4: there exists something such that that it does not reposition denomination and is not directed is not true.; int4 & sent16 -> int5: the hull is a kind of a Pashto.; int5 -> int6: the fact that there exists something such that it is a Pashto is not false.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the warrener is not unawares.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it is not unawares.; int8 & sent17 -> int9: the burthen is camphoric and/or it is a balkline.; int9 & sent1 & sent9 -> int10: the piperacillin is camphoric.; sent13 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the piperacillin does not recommend piperacillin and it does not reposition hyperextension is incorrect.; int3 & int11 -> int12: the fact that the piperacillin does not reposition oxalis is not incorrect.; int12 -> int13: there is something such that it does not reposition oxalis.;" ]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the stacte is not a stubbornness. ; $context$ = sent1: if the burthen is camphoric then the piperacillin is camphoric. sent2: the stacte does recommend onrush. sent3: something is not a kind of a stubbornness if the fact that it is not non-chondritic but incorporeal is incorrect. sent4: if the fact that the piperacillin does reposition oxalis is true the stacte is a stubbornness. sent5: that the piperacillin is not corporeal and it does not reposition oxalis is not true if there exists something such that it is chondritic. sent6: that the oxalis does not reposition denomination and does not direct is not right. sent7: if there is something such that it is a Pashto the warrener is not unawares. sent8: if the fact that something does not recommend piperacillin and does not reposition hyperextension is wrong then it does not reposition oxalis. sent9: the piperacillin is camphoric if the burthen is a balkline. sent10: there is something such that it is chondritic. sent11: the piperacillin is corporeal if the stacte does reposition oxalis. sent12: if the fact that the stacte is not a stubbornness and does not reposition oxalis does not hold then the piperacillin is corporeal. sent13: if the piperacillin is camphoric the fact that it does not recommend piperacillin and does not reposition hyperextension is wrong. sent14: the fact that the piperacillin does not recommend voluntary and is not a farina is false. sent15: the stacte is a stubbornness if that the piperacillin is not corporeal and does not reposition oxalis does not hold. sent16: if there is something such that the fact that it does not reposition denomination and does not direct is not correct then the hull is a Pashto. sent17: the burthen is camphoric and/or is a balkline if there are non-unawares things. sent18: if the stacte is corporeal the piperacillin is a kind of a stubbornness. sent19: the stacte is a deliberation. ; $proof$ =
sent10 & sent5 -> int1: the fact that the piperacillin is not corporeal and does not reposition oxalis is not right.; sent15 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
DeductionInstance
there is something such that it is chondritic.
[ "that the piperacillin is not corporeal and it does not reposition oxalis is not true if there exists something such that it is chondritic.", "the stacte is a stubbornness if that the piperacillin is not corporeal and does not reposition oxalis does not hold." ]
[ "There is something that makes it seem like it ischondritic.", "There is something that ischondritic." ]
There is something that ischondritic.
the stacte is a stubbornness if that the piperacillin is not corporeal and does not reposition oxalis does not hold.
something is a true and an allegro.
sent1: something that is not an allegro decomposes and does true. sent2: the retardant is a kind of an allegro. sent3: the retardant is a kind of a true. sent4: there is something such that it is a sentimentality.
(Ex): ({A}x & {B}x)
sent1: (x): ¬{B}x -> ({HA}x & {A}x) sent2: {B}{a} sent3: {A}{a} sent4: (Ex): {HJ}x
[ "sent3 & sent2 -> int1: the retardant is true and is an allegro.; int1 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
[ "sent3 & sent2 -> int1: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}); int1 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
2
2
2
0
2
the sima decomposes and is true.
({HA}{bo} & {A}{bo})
5
[ "sent1 -> int2: the sima decomposes and it is a true if that it is not an allegro hold.;" ]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = something is a true and an allegro. ; $context$ = sent1: something that is not an allegro decomposes and does true. sent2: the retardant is a kind of an allegro. sent3: the retardant is a kind of a true. sent4: there is something such that it is a sentimentality. ; $proof$ =
sent3 & sent2 -> int1: the retardant is true and is an allegro.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
DeductionInstance
the retardant is a kind of a true.
[ "the retardant is a kind of an allegro." ]
[ "the retardant is a kind of a true." ]
the retardant is a kind of a true.
the retardant is a kind of an allegro.
the demagogue is a hyena.
sent1: something that does not recommend taxman repositions freestyle. sent2: everything does not reposition Recife. sent3: if the demagogue does not recommend taxman then it repositions freestyle. sent4: that the demagogue does recommend taxman and is not a kind of a chemistry is wrong if it does not reposition Recife. sent5: the demagogue does suffer Belem if it does suffer companionability. sent6: something is a hyena if it does reposition freestyle. sent7: everything does not complete. sent8: if the demagogue is a hyena then it is chirpy. sent9: the Dexedrine is not a hyena. sent10: if the fact that something is not a chemistry but a hyena is incorrect it is not a kind of a hyena. sent11: the exaltation does reposition freestyle. sent12: if that the high does recommend taxman and it repositions Recife does not hold that it does not repositions Recife hold. sent13: that the cad is a kind of a noisemaker but it is not a kind of a chemistry is false. sent14: everything is not a demonstrative. sent15: the demagogue does not intertwine. sent16: something is Singaporean if that that it is a Stuyvesant and it is not vibrational is not wrong does not hold. sent17: the oolong does not reposition freestyle.
{E}{aa}
sent1: (x): ¬{C}x -> {D}x sent2: (x): ¬{A}x sent3: ¬{C}{aa} -> {D}{aa} sent4: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬({C}{aa} & ¬{B}{aa}) sent5: {AP}{aa} -> {DK}{aa} sent6: (x): {D}x -> {E}x sent7: (x): ¬{CE}x sent8: {E}{aa} -> {BI}{aa} sent9: ¬{E}{dr} sent10: (x): ¬(¬{B}x & {E}x) -> ¬{E}x sent11: {D}{je} sent12: ¬({C}{a} & {A}{a}) -> ¬{A}{a} sent13: ¬({HR}{ia} & ¬{B}{ia}) sent14: (x): ¬{BN}x sent15: ¬{G}{aa} sent16: (x): ¬({GJ}x & ¬{HU}x) -> {CR}x sent17: ¬{D}{di}
[ "sent2 -> int1: that the demagogue does not reposition Recife is not false.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the fact that the demagogue does recommend taxman and is not a kind of a chemistry does not hold.; sent6 -> int3: if the demagogue does reposition freestyle it is a hyena.;" ]
UNKNOWN
[ "sent2 -> int1: ¬{A}{aa}; int1 & sent4 -> int2: ¬({C}{aa} & ¬{B}{aa}); sent6 -> int3: {D}{aa} -> {E}{aa};" ]
UNKNOWN
4
null
14
0
14
the demagogue is not a hyena.
¬{E}{aa}
8
[]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the demagogue is a hyena. ; $context$ = sent1: something that does not recommend taxman repositions freestyle. sent2: everything does not reposition Recife. sent3: if the demagogue does not recommend taxman then it repositions freestyle. sent4: that the demagogue does recommend taxman and is not a kind of a chemistry is wrong if it does not reposition Recife. sent5: the demagogue does suffer Belem if it does suffer companionability. sent6: something is a hyena if it does reposition freestyle. sent7: everything does not complete. sent8: if the demagogue is a hyena then it is chirpy. sent9: the Dexedrine is not a hyena. sent10: if the fact that something is not a chemistry but a hyena is incorrect it is not a kind of a hyena. sent11: the exaltation does reposition freestyle. sent12: if that the high does recommend taxman and it repositions Recife does not hold that it does not repositions Recife hold. sent13: that the cad is a kind of a noisemaker but it is not a kind of a chemistry is false. sent14: everything is not a demonstrative. sent15: the demagogue does not intertwine. sent16: something is Singaporean if that that it is a Stuyvesant and it is not vibrational is not wrong does not hold. sent17: the oolong does not reposition freestyle. ; $proof$ =
__UNKNOWN__
DeductionInstance
everything does not reposition Recife.
[ "that the demagogue does recommend taxman and is not a kind of a chemistry is wrong if it does not reposition Recife.", "something is a hyena if it does reposition freestyle." ]
[ "888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 is 888-282-0465 is 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 is 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 is 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 is 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465", "888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 is 888-282-0465 is 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 is 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 is 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 is 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465" ]
888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 is 888-282-0465 is 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 is 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 is 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 is 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465
that the demagogue does recommend taxman and is not a kind of a chemistry is wrong if it does not reposition Recife.
the demagogue is a hyena.
sent1: something that does not recommend taxman repositions freestyle. sent2: everything does not reposition Recife. sent3: if the demagogue does not recommend taxman then it repositions freestyle. sent4: that the demagogue does recommend taxman and is not a kind of a chemistry is wrong if it does not reposition Recife. sent5: the demagogue does suffer Belem if it does suffer companionability. sent6: something is a hyena if it does reposition freestyle. sent7: everything does not complete. sent8: if the demagogue is a hyena then it is chirpy. sent9: the Dexedrine is not a hyena. sent10: if the fact that something is not a chemistry but a hyena is incorrect it is not a kind of a hyena. sent11: the exaltation does reposition freestyle. sent12: if that the high does recommend taxman and it repositions Recife does not hold that it does not repositions Recife hold. sent13: that the cad is a kind of a noisemaker but it is not a kind of a chemistry is false. sent14: everything is not a demonstrative. sent15: the demagogue does not intertwine. sent16: something is Singaporean if that that it is a Stuyvesant and it is not vibrational is not wrong does not hold. sent17: the oolong does not reposition freestyle.
{E}{aa}
sent1: (x): ¬{C}x -> {D}x sent2: (x): ¬{A}x sent3: ¬{C}{aa} -> {D}{aa} sent4: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬({C}{aa} & ¬{B}{aa}) sent5: {AP}{aa} -> {DK}{aa} sent6: (x): {D}x -> {E}x sent7: (x): ¬{CE}x sent8: {E}{aa} -> {BI}{aa} sent9: ¬{E}{dr} sent10: (x): ¬(¬{B}x & {E}x) -> ¬{E}x sent11: {D}{je} sent12: ¬({C}{a} & {A}{a}) -> ¬{A}{a} sent13: ¬({HR}{ia} & ¬{B}{ia}) sent14: (x): ¬{BN}x sent15: ¬{G}{aa} sent16: (x): ¬({GJ}x & ¬{HU}x) -> {CR}x sent17: ¬{D}{di}
[ "sent2 -> int1: that the demagogue does not reposition Recife is not false.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the fact that the demagogue does recommend taxman and is not a kind of a chemistry does not hold.; sent6 -> int3: if the demagogue does reposition freestyle it is a hyena.;" ]
UNKNOWN
[ "sent2 -> int1: ¬{A}{aa}; int1 & sent4 -> int2: ¬({C}{aa} & ¬{B}{aa}); sent6 -> int3: {D}{aa} -> {E}{aa};" ]
UNKNOWN
4
null
14
0
14
the demagogue is not a hyena.
¬{E}{aa}
8
[]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the demagogue is a hyena. ; $context$ = sent1: something that does not recommend taxman repositions freestyle. sent2: everything does not reposition Recife. sent3: if the demagogue does not recommend taxman then it repositions freestyle. sent4: that the demagogue does recommend taxman and is not a kind of a chemistry is wrong if it does not reposition Recife. sent5: the demagogue does suffer Belem if it does suffer companionability. sent6: something is a hyena if it does reposition freestyle. sent7: everything does not complete. sent8: if the demagogue is a hyena then it is chirpy. sent9: the Dexedrine is not a hyena. sent10: if the fact that something is not a chemistry but a hyena is incorrect it is not a kind of a hyena. sent11: the exaltation does reposition freestyle. sent12: if that the high does recommend taxman and it repositions Recife does not hold that it does not repositions Recife hold. sent13: that the cad is a kind of a noisemaker but it is not a kind of a chemistry is false. sent14: everything is not a demonstrative. sent15: the demagogue does not intertwine. sent16: something is Singaporean if that that it is a Stuyvesant and it is not vibrational is not wrong does not hold. sent17: the oolong does not reposition freestyle. ; $proof$ =
__UNKNOWN__
DeductionInstance
everything does not reposition Recife.
[ "that the demagogue does recommend taxman and is not a kind of a chemistry is wrong if it does not reposition Recife.", "something is a hyena if it does reposition freestyle." ]
[ "888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 is 888-282-0465 is 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 is 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 is 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 is 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465", "888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 is 888-282-0465 is 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 is 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 is 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 is 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465" ]
888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 is 888-282-0465 is 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 is 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 is 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 is 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465 888-282-0465
something is a hyena if it does reposition freestyle.
both the repositioning tempering and the captainship happens.
sent1: the backhandedness does not occur. sent2: the annalisticness occurs. sent3: the planetalness occurs. sent4: the captainship and the planetalness happens. sent5: the depravity occurs. sent6: the orthographicness happens and the uterineness happens. sent7: if the notch occurs but the way does not occur then the borealness happens. sent8: that the petty but not the single occurs prevents that the repositioning tempering does not occur. sent9: the infernal does not occur. sent10: the aponeuroticness occurs. sent11: the paranasalness occurs. sent12: the petty occurs and the singleness does not occur. sent13: the scrunch occurs. sent14: the leaningness occurs but the indecency does not occur. sent15: the corroding axon occurs. sent16: the mixture happens. sent17: the unpretentiousness occurs and the drive occurs. sent18: the citrousness does not occur.
({B} & {A})
sent1: ¬{EG} sent2: {IJ} sent3: {C} sent4: ({A} & {C}) sent5: {GT} sent6: ({JE} & {HT}) sent7: ({IT} & ¬{J}) -> {HO} sent8: ({AA} & ¬{AB}) -> {B} sent9: ¬{BJ} sent10: {AO} sent11: {DP} sent12: ({AA} & ¬{AB}) sent13: {GK} sent14: ({ET} & ¬{HU}) sent15: {K} sent16: {IM} sent17: ({BK} & {FE}) sent18: ¬{DL}
[ "sent8 & sent12 -> int1: that the repositioning tempering occurs hold.; sent4 -> int2: the captainship happens.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
[ "sent8 & sent12 -> int1: {B}; sent4 -> int2: {A}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
2
2
15
0
15
null
null
null
[]
null
null
$hypothesis$ = both the repositioning tempering and the captainship happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the backhandedness does not occur. sent2: the annalisticness occurs. sent3: the planetalness occurs. sent4: the captainship and the planetalness happens. sent5: the depravity occurs. sent6: the orthographicness happens and the uterineness happens. sent7: if the notch occurs but the way does not occur then the borealness happens. sent8: that the petty but not the single occurs prevents that the repositioning tempering does not occur. sent9: the infernal does not occur. sent10: the aponeuroticness occurs. sent11: the paranasalness occurs. sent12: the petty occurs and the singleness does not occur. sent13: the scrunch occurs. sent14: the leaningness occurs but the indecency does not occur. sent15: the corroding axon occurs. sent16: the mixture happens. sent17: the unpretentiousness occurs and the drive occurs. sent18: the citrousness does not occur. ; $proof$ =
sent8 & sent12 -> int1: that the repositioning tempering occurs hold.; sent4 -> int2: the captainship happens.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
DeductionInstance
that the petty but not the single occurs prevents that the repositioning tempering does not occur.
[ "the petty occurs and the singleness does not occur.", "the captainship and the planetalness happens." ]
[ "The repositioning is prevented by the fact that the single occurs.", "The repositioning does not occur if the single occurs." ]
The repositioning is prevented by the fact that the single occurs.
the petty occurs and the singleness does not occur.
both the repositioning tempering and the captainship happens.
sent1: the backhandedness does not occur. sent2: the annalisticness occurs. sent3: the planetalness occurs. sent4: the captainship and the planetalness happens. sent5: the depravity occurs. sent6: the orthographicness happens and the uterineness happens. sent7: if the notch occurs but the way does not occur then the borealness happens. sent8: that the petty but not the single occurs prevents that the repositioning tempering does not occur. sent9: the infernal does not occur. sent10: the aponeuroticness occurs. sent11: the paranasalness occurs. sent12: the petty occurs and the singleness does not occur. sent13: the scrunch occurs. sent14: the leaningness occurs but the indecency does not occur. sent15: the corroding axon occurs. sent16: the mixture happens. sent17: the unpretentiousness occurs and the drive occurs. sent18: the citrousness does not occur.
({B} & {A})
sent1: ¬{EG} sent2: {IJ} sent3: {C} sent4: ({A} & {C}) sent5: {GT} sent6: ({JE} & {HT}) sent7: ({IT} & ¬{J}) -> {HO} sent8: ({AA} & ¬{AB}) -> {B} sent9: ¬{BJ} sent10: {AO} sent11: {DP} sent12: ({AA} & ¬{AB}) sent13: {GK} sent14: ({ET} & ¬{HU}) sent15: {K} sent16: {IM} sent17: ({BK} & {FE}) sent18: ¬{DL}
[ "sent8 & sent12 -> int1: that the repositioning tempering occurs hold.; sent4 -> int2: the captainship happens.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
[ "sent8 & sent12 -> int1: {B}; sent4 -> int2: {A}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
2
2
15
0
15
null
null
null
[]
null
null
$hypothesis$ = both the repositioning tempering and the captainship happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the backhandedness does not occur. sent2: the annalisticness occurs. sent3: the planetalness occurs. sent4: the captainship and the planetalness happens. sent5: the depravity occurs. sent6: the orthographicness happens and the uterineness happens. sent7: if the notch occurs but the way does not occur then the borealness happens. sent8: that the petty but not the single occurs prevents that the repositioning tempering does not occur. sent9: the infernal does not occur. sent10: the aponeuroticness occurs. sent11: the paranasalness occurs. sent12: the petty occurs and the singleness does not occur. sent13: the scrunch occurs. sent14: the leaningness occurs but the indecency does not occur. sent15: the corroding axon occurs. sent16: the mixture happens. sent17: the unpretentiousness occurs and the drive occurs. sent18: the citrousness does not occur. ; $proof$ =
sent8 & sent12 -> int1: that the repositioning tempering occurs hold.; sent4 -> int2: the captainship happens.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
DeductionInstance
that the petty but not the single occurs prevents that the repositioning tempering does not occur.
[ "the petty occurs and the singleness does not occur.", "the captainship and the planetalness happens." ]
[ "The repositioning is prevented by the fact that the single occurs.", "The repositioning does not occur if the single occurs." ]
The repositioning does not occur if the single occurs.
the captainship and the planetalness happens.
the frijolito is chirpy.
sent1: if that the frijolito is a Bellarmine and/or it discriminates does not hold it is chirpy. sent2: the EPROM is not a Bellarmine if that the fact that the goblet repositions tempered or it is not a morrow or both is not incorrect is incorrect. sent3: that the goblet repositions tempered and/or is not a kind of a morrow does not hold. sent4: if the fact that the frijolito is a Bellarmine or is not chirpy or both is wrong then that the EPROM is not discriminate is correct. sent5: the fact that the goblet is a kind of a morrow is right. sent6: if the fact that the EPROM is not a kind of a Bellarmine is correct then the frijolito is discriminate. sent7: the oxalis does reposition tempered. sent8: something is chirpy if the fact that it is a kind of a Bellarmine or it is not discriminate or both does not hold. sent9: if that something is a Bellarmine or it is discriminate or both does not hold it is chirpy. sent10: that the EPROM suffers aloe or it is not antecubital or both does not hold. sent11: something is chirpy if the fact that it is a kind of a Bellarmine or it does not reposition tempered or both does not hold. sent12: the frijolito is not indiscriminate. sent13: if that the EPROM is not a kind of a Bellarmine is not wrong the fact that the frijolito is a Bellarmine or is not discriminate or both is incorrect. sent14: if something is not a boatyard then it is a kind of a Bellarmine that discriminates. sent15: if the fact that the goblet does reposition tempered and/or is a morrow is incorrect then the EPROM is not a Bellarmine. sent16: the frijolito is not discriminate if the fact that the EPROM is a Bellarmine or it does not reposition tempered or both does not hold. sent17: something repositions tempered if the fact that either it is chirpy or it is not a morrow or both is wrong.
{A}{c}
sent1: ¬({B}{c} v {C}{c}) -> {A}{c} sent2: ¬({AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} sent3: ¬({AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) sent4: ¬({B}{c} v ¬{A}{c}) -> ¬{C}{b} sent5: {AB}{a} sent6: ¬{B}{b} -> {C}{c} sent7: {AA}{go} sent8: (x): ¬({B}x v ¬{C}x) -> {A}x sent9: (x): ¬({B}x v {C}x) -> {A}x sent10: ¬({DQ}{b} v ¬{AL}{b}) sent11: (x): ¬({B}x v ¬{AA}x) -> {A}x sent12: {C}{c} sent13: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬({B}{c} v ¬{C}{c}) sent14: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({B}x & {C}x) sent15: ¬({AA}{a} v {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} sent16: ¬({B}{b} v ¬{AA}{b}) -> ¬{C}{c} sent17: (x): ¬({A}x v ¬{AB}x) -> {AA}x
[ "sent2 & sent3 -> int1: the EPROM is not a Bellarmine.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: that the frijolito either is a Bellarmine or does not discriminate or both is not true.; sent8 -> int3: the frijolito is chirpy if the fact that it either is a Bellarmine or is not discriminate or both is wrong.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
[ "sent2 & sent3 -> int1: ¬{B}{b}; int1 & sent13 -> int2: ¬({B}{c} v ¬{C}{c}); sent8 -> int3: ¬({B}{c} v ¬{C}{c}) -> {A}{c}; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
3
3
13
0
13
that the goblet is corneal and/or it is not chirpy does not hold.
¬({HH}{a} v ¬{A}{a})
4
[ "sent14 -> int4: the goblet is a Bellarmine and discriminates if it is not a kind of a boatyard.;" ]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the frijolito is chirpy. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the frijolito is a Bellarmine and/or it discriminates does not hold it is chirpy. sent2: the EPROM is not a Bellarmine if that the fact that the goblet repositions tempered or it is not a morrow or both is not incorrect is incorrect. sent3: that the goblet repositions tempered and/or is not a kind of a morrow does not hold. sent4: if the fact that the frijolito is a Bellarmine or is not chirpy or both is wrong then that the EPROM is not discriminate is correct. sent5: the fact that the goblet is a kind of a morrow is right. sent6: if the fact that the EPROM is not a kind of a Bellarmine is correct then the frijolito is discriminate. sent7: the oxalis does reposition tempered. sent8: something is chirpy if the fact that it is a kind of a Bellarmine or it is not discriminate or both does not hold. sent9: if that something is a Bellarmine or it is discriminate or both does not hold it is chirpy. sent10: that the EPROM suffers aloe or it is not antecubital or both does not hold. sent11: something is chirpy if the fact that it is a kind of a Bellarmine or it does not reposition tempered or both does not hold. sent12: the frijolito is not indiscriminate. sent13: if that the EPROM is not a kind of a Bellarmine is not wrong the fact that the frijolito is a Bellarmine or is not discriminate or both is incorrect. sent14: if something is not a boatyard then it is a kind of a Bellarmine that discriminates. sent15: if the fact that the goblet does reposition tempered and/or is a morrow is incorrect then the EPROM is not a Bellarmine. sent16: the frijolito is not discriminate if the fact that the EPROM is a Bellarmine or it does not reposition tempered or both does not hold. sent17: something repositions tempered if the fact that either it is chirpy or it is not a morrow or both is wrong. ; $proof$ =
sent2 & sent3 -> int1: the EPROM is not a Bellarmine.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: that the frijolito either is a Bellarmine or does not discriminate or both is not true.; sent8 -> int3: the frijolito is chirpy if the fact that it either is a Bellarmine or is not discriminate or both is wrong.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
DeductionInstance
the EPROM is not a Bellarmine if that the fact that the goblet repositions tempered or it is not a morrow or both is not incorrect is incorrect.
[ "that the goblet repositions tempered and/or is not a kind of a morrow does not hold.", "if that the EPROM is not a kind of a Bellarmine is not wrong the fact that the frijolito is a Bellarmine or is not discriminate or both is incorrect.", "something is chirpy if the fact that it is a kind of a Bellarmine or it is not discriminate or both does not hold." ]
[ "The fact that the goblets are not incorrect or that it is not a morrow is incorrect.", "The fact that the goblets are not correct or that it is not a morrow is incorrect.", "It is incorrect to say that the goblets are not incorrect or that it is not a morrow." ]
The fact that the goblets are not incorrect or that it is not a morrow is incorrect.
that the goblet repositions tempered and/or is not a kind of a morrow does not hold.
the frijolito is chirpy.
sent1: if that the frijolito is a Bellarmine and/or it discriminates does not hold it is chirpy. sent2: the EPROM is not a Bellarmine if that the fact that the goblet repositions tempered or it is not a morrow or both is not incorrect is incorrect. sent3: that the goblet repositions tempered and/or is not a kind of a morrow does not hold. sent4: if the fact that the frijolito is a Bellarmine or is not chirpy or both is wrong then that the EPROM is not discriminate is correct. sent5: the fact that the goblet is a kind of a morrow is right. sent6: if the fact that the EPROM is not a kind of a Bellarmine is correct then the frijolito is discriminate. sent7: the oxalis does reposition tempered. sent8: something is chirpy if the fact that it is a kind of a Bellarmine or it is not discriminate or both does not hold. sent9: if that something is a Bellarmine or it is discriminate or both does not hold it is chirpy. sent10: that the EPROM suffers aloe or it is not antecubital or both does not hold. sent11: something is chirpy if the fact that it is a kind of a Bellarmine or it does not reposition tempered or both does not hold. sent12: the frijolito is not indiscriminate. sent13: if that the EPROM is not a kind of a Bellarmine is not wrong the fact that the frijolito is a Bellarmine or is not discriminate or both is incorrect. sent14: if something is not a boatyard then it is a kind of a Bellarmine that discriminates. sent15: if the fact that the goblet does reposition tempered and/or is a morrow is incorrect then the EPROM is not a Bellarmine. sent16: the frijolito is not discriminate if the fact that the EPROM is a Bellarmine or it does not reposition tempered or both does not hold. sent17: something repositions tempered if the fact that either it is chirpy or it is not a morrow or both is wrong.
{A}{c}
sent1: ¬({B}{c} v {C}{c}) -> {A}{c} sent2: ¬({AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} sent3: ¬({AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) sent4: ¬({B}{c} v ¬{A}{c}) -> ¬{C}{b} sent5: {AB}{a} sent6: ¬{B}{b} -> {C}{c} sent7: {AA}{go} sent8: (x): ¬({B}x v ¬{C}x) -> {A}x sent9: (x): ¬({B}x v {C}x) -> {A}x sent10: ¬({DQ}{b} v ¬{AL}{b}) sent11: (x): ¬({B}x v ¬{AA}x) -> {A}x sent12: {C}{c} sent13: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬({B}{c} v ¬{C}{c}) sent14: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({B}x & {C}x) sent15: ¬({AA}{a} v {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} sent16: ¬({B}{b} v ¬{AA}{b}) -> ¬{C}{c} sent17: (x): ¬({A}x v ¬{AB}x) -> {AA}x
[ "sent2 & sent3 -> int1: the EPROM is not a Bellarmine.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: that the frijolito either is a Bellarmine or does not discriminate or both is not true.; sent8 -> int3: the frijolito is chirpy if the fact that it either is a Bellarmine or is not discriminate or both is wrong.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
[ "sent2 & sent3 -> int1: ¬{B}{b}; int1 & sent13 -> int2: ¬({B}{c} v ¬{C}{c}); sent8 -> int3: ¬({B}{c} v ¬{C}{c}) -> {A}{c}; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
3
3
13
0
13
that the goblet is corneal and/or it is not chirpy does not hold.
¬({HH}{a} v ¬{A}{a})
4
[ "sent14 -> int4: the goblet is a Bellarmine and discriminates if it is not a kind of a boatyard.;" ]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the frijolito is chirpy. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the frijolito is a Bellarmine and/or it discriminates does not hold it is chirpy. sent2: the EPROM is not a Bellarmine if that the fact that the goblet repositions tempered or it is not a morrow or both is not incorrect is incorrect. sent3: that the goblet repositions tempered and/or is not a kind of a morrow does not hold. sent4: if the fact that the frijolito is a Bellarmine or is not chirpy or both is wrong then that the EPROM is not discriminate is correct. sent5: the fact that the goblet is a kind of a morrow is right. sent6: if the fact that the EPROM is not a kind of a Bellarmine is correct then the frijolito is discriminate. sent7: the oxalis does reposition tempered. sent8: something is chirpy if the fact that it is a kind of a Bellarmine or it is not discriminate or both does not hold. sent9: if that something is a Bellarmine or it is discriminate or both does not hold it is chirpy. sent10: that the EPROM suffers aloe or it is not antecubital or both does not hold. sent11: something is chirpy if the fact that it is a kind of a Bellarmine or it does not reposition tempered or both does not hold. sent12: the frijolito is not indiscriminate. sent13: if that the EPROM is not a kind of a Bellarmine is not wrong the fact that the frijolito is a Bellarmine or is not discriminate or both is incorrect. sent14: if something is not a boatyard then it is a kind of a Bellarmine that discriminates. sent15: if the fact that the goblet does reposition tempered and/or is a morrow is incorrect then the EPROM is not a Bellarmine. sent16: the frijolito is not discriminate if the fact that the EPROM is a Bellarmine or it does not reposition tempered or both does not hold. sent17: something repositions tempered if the fact that either it is chirpy or it is not a morrow or both is wrong. ; $proof$ =
sent2 & sent3 -> int1: the EPROM is not a Bellarmine.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: that the frijolito either is a Bellarmine or does not discriminate or both is not true.; sent8 -> int3: the frijolito is chirpy if the fact that it either is a Bellarmine or is not discriminate or both is wrong.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
DeductionInstance
the EPROM is not a Bellarmine if that the fact that the goblet repositions tempered or it is not a morrow or both is not incorrect is incorrect.
[ "that the goblet repositions tempered and/or is not a kind of a morrow does not hold.", "if that the EPROM is not a kind of a Bellarmine is not wrong the fact that the frijolito is a Bellarmine or is not discriminate or both is incorrect.", "something is chirpy if the fact that it is a kind of a Bellarmine or it is not discriminate or both does not hold." ]
[ "The fact that the goblets are not incorrect or that it is not a morrow is incorrect.", "The fact that the goblets are not correct or that it is not a morrow is incorrect.", "It is incorrect to say that the goblets are not incorrect or that it is not a morrow." ]
The fact that the goblets are not correct or that it is not a morrow is incorrect.
if that the EPROM is not a kind of a Bellarmine is not wrong the fact that the frijolito is a Bellarmine or is not discriminate or both is incorrect.
the frijolito is chirpy.
sent1: if that the frijolito is a Bellarmine and/or it discriminates does not hold it is chirpy. sent2: the EPROM is not a Bellarmine if that the fact that the goblet repositions tempered or it is not a morrow or both is not incorrect is incorrect. sent3: that the goblet repositions tempered and/or is not a kind of a morrow does not hold. sent4: if the fact that the frijolito is a Bellarmine or is not chirpy or both is wrong then that the EPROM is not discriminate is correct. sent5: the fact that the goblet is a kind of a morrow is right. sent6: if the fact that the EPROM is not a kind of a Bellarmine is correct then the frijolito is discriminate. sent7: the oxalis does reposition tempered. sent8: something is chirpy if the fact that it is a kind of a Bellarmine or it is not discriminate or both does not hold. sent9: if that something is a Bellarmine or it is discriminate or both does not hold it is chirpy. sent10: that the EPROM suffers aloe or it is not antecubital or both does not hold. sent11: something is chirpy if the fact that it is a kind of a Bellarmine or it does not reposition tempered or both does not hold. sent12: the frijolito is not indiscriminate. sent13: if that the EPROM is not a kind of a Bellarmine is not wrong the fact that the frijolito is a Bellarmine or is not discriminate or both is incorrect. sent14: if something is not a boatyard then it is a kind of a Bellarmine that discriminates. sent15: if the fact that the goblet does reposition tempered and/or is a morrow is incorrect then the EPROM is not a Bellarmine. sent16: the frijolito is not discriminate if the fact that the EPROM is a Bellarmine or it does not reposition tempered or both does not hold. sent17: something repositions tempered if the fact that either it is chirpy or it is not a morrow or both is wrong.
{A}{c}
sent1: ¬({B}{c} v {C}{c}) -> {A}{c} sent2: ¬({AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} sent3: ¬({AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) sent4: ¬({B}{c} v ¬{A}{c}) -> ¬{C}{b} sent5: {AB}{a} sent6: ¬{B}{b} -> {C}{c} sent7: {AA}{go} sent8: (x): ¬({B}x v ¬{C}x) -> {A}x sent9: (x): ¬({B}x v {C}x) -> {A}x sent10: ¬({DQ}{b} v ¬{AL}{b}) sent11: (x): ¬({B}x v ¬{AA}x) -> {A}x sent12: {C}{c} sent13: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬({B}{c} v ¬{C}{c}) sent14: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({B}x & {C}x) sent15: ¬({AA}{a} v {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} sent16: ¬({B}{b} v ¬{AA}{b}) -> ¬{C}{c} sent17: (x): ¬({A}x v ¬{AB}x) -> {AA}x
[ "sent2 & sent3 -> int1: the EPROM is not a Bellarmine.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: that the frijolito either is a Bellarmine or does not discriminate or both is not true.; sent8 -> int3: the frijolito is chirpy if the fact that it either is a Bellarmine or is not discriminate or both is wrong.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
[ "sent2 & sent3 -> int1: ¬{B}{b}; int1 & sent13 -> int2: ¬({B}{c} v ¬{C}{c}); sent8 -> int3: ¬({B}{c} v ¬{C}{c}) -> {A}{c}; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
3
3
13
0
13
that the goblet is corneal and/or it is not chirpy does not hold.
¬({HH}{a} v ¬{A}{a})
4
[ "sent14 -> int4: the goblet is a Bellarmine and discriminates if it is not a kind of a boatyard.;" ]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the frijolito is chirpy. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the frijolito is a Bellarmine and/or it discriminates does not hold it is chirpy. sent2: the EPROM is not a Bellarmine if that the fact that the goblet repositions tempered or it is not a morrow or both is not incorrect is incorrect. sent3: that the goblet repositions tempered and/or is not a kind of a morrow does not hold. sent4: if the fact that the frijolito is a Bellarmine or is not chirpy or both is wrong then that the EPROM is not discriminate is correct. sent5: the fact that the goblet is a kind of a morrow is right. sent6: if the fact that the EPROM is not a kind of a Bellarmine is correct then the frijolito is discriminate. sent7: the oxalis does reposition tempered. sent8: something is chirpy if the fact that it is a kind of a Bellarmine or it is not discriminate or both does not hold. sent9: if that something is a Bellarmine or it is discriminate or both does not hold it is chirpy. sent10: that the EPROM suffers aloe or it is not antecubital or both does not hold. sent11: something is chirpy if the fact that it is a kind of a Bellarmine or it does not reposition tempered or both does not hold. sent12: the frijolito is not indiscriminate. sent13: if that the EPROM is not a kind of a Bellarmine is not wrong the fact that the frijolito is a Bellarmine or is not discriminate or both is incorrect. sent14: if something is not a boatyard then it is a kind of a Bellarmine that discriminates. sent15: if the fact that the goblet does reposition tempered and/or is a morrow is incorrect then the EPROM is not a Bellarmine. sent16: the frijolito is not discriminate if the fact that the EPROM is a Bellarmine or it does not reposition tempered or both does not hold. sent17: something repositions tempered if the fact that either it is chirpy or it is not a morrow or both is wrong. ; $proof$ =
sent2 & sent3 -> int1: the EPROM is not a Bellarmine.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: that the frijolito either is a Bellarmine or does not discriminate or both is not true.; sent8 -> int3: the frijolito is chirpy if the fact that it either is a Bellarmine or is not discriminate or both is wrong.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
DeductionInstance
the EPROM is not a Bellarmine if that the fact that the goblet repositions tempered or it is not a morrow or both is not incorrect is incorrect.
[ "that the goblet repositions tempered and/or is not a kind of a morrow does not hold.", "if that the EPROM is not a kind of a Bellarmine is not wrong the fact that the frijolito is a Bellarmine or is not discriminate or both is incorrect.", "something is chirpy if the fact that it is a kind of a Bellarmine or it is not discriminate or both does not hold." ]
[ "The fact that the goblets are not incorrect or that it is not a morrow is incorrect.", "The fact that the goblets are not correct or that it is not a morrow is incorrect.", "It is incorrect to say that the goblets are not incorrect or that it is not a morrow." ]
It is incorrect to say that the goblets are not incorrect or that it is not a morrow.
something is chirpy if the fact that it is a kind of a Bellarmine or it is not discriminate or both does not hold.
the Friesian does swap and it repositions chinaberry.
sent1: the Friesian is a kind of a buckthorn and it unplugs. sent2: if that the tassel does unplug and is not a buckthorn is wrong then that it does not unplug is correct. sent3: the Friesian does suffer philatelist if something repositions refreshment and it does concoct. sent4: the Guatemalan does not unplug. sent5: something does reposition refreshment. sent6: if that something does unplug is right that it swaps is not incorrect. sent7: the fact that something does reposition refreshment and concocts is not incorrect. sent8: that the tassel does unplug and is not a buckthorn is wrong if there is something such that it does not unplug. sent9: if the tassel does not unplug then that the Rollerblade suffers philatelist and it concocts does not hold.
({E}{a} & {D}{a})
sent1: ({G}{a} & {F}{a}) sent2: ¬({F}{c} & ¬{G}{c}) -> ¬{F}{c} sent3: (x): ({A}x & {B}x) -> {C}{a} sent4: ¬{F}{d} sent5: (Ex): {A}x sent6: (x): {F}x -> {E}x sent7: (Ex): ({A}x & {B}x) sent8: (x): ¬{F}x -> ¬({F}{c} & ¬{G}{c}) sent9: ¬{F}{c} -> ¬({C}{b} & {B}{b})
[ "sent7 & sent3 -> int1: that the Friesian suffers philatelist is correct.; sent6 -> int2: the Friesian swaps if it does unplug.; sent1 -> int3: the Friesian does unplug.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that the Friesian swaps is right.;" ]
UNKNOWN
[ "sent7 & sent3 -> int1: {C}{a}; sent6 -> int2: {F}{a} -> {E}{a}; sent1 -> int3: {F}{a}; int2 & int3 -> int4: {E}{a};" ]
UNKNOWN
3
null
5
0
5
the Friesian is a setter and it repositions refreshment.
({GD}{a} & {A}{a})
7
[ "sent4 -> int5: there exists something such that that it does not unplug is correct.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the fact that the tassel does unplug but it is not a kind of a buckthorn is not true.; sent2 & int6 -> int7: the tassel does not unplug.; sent9 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the Rollerblade does suffer philatelist and it does concoct does not hold.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that the fact that it does suffer philatelist and it does concoct is not true.;" ]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the Friesian does swap and it repositions chinaberry. ; $context$ = sent1: the Friesian is a kind of a buckthorn and it unplugs. sent2: if that the tassel does unplug and is not a buckthorn is wrong then that it does not unplug is correct. sent3: the Friesian does suffer philatelist if something repositions refreshment and it does concoct. sent4: the Guatemalan does not unplug. sent5: something does reposition refreshment. sent6: if that something does unplug is right that it swaps is not incorrect. sent7: the fact that something does reposition refreshment and concocts is not incorrect. sent8: that the tassel does unplug and is not a buckthorn is wrong if there is something such that it does not unplug. sent9: if the tassel does not unplug then that the Rollerblade suffers philatelist and it concocts does not hold. ; $proof$ =
__UNKNOWN__
DeductionInstance
the fact that something does reposition refreshment and concocts is not incorrect.
[ "the Friesian does suffer philatelist if something repositions refreshment and it does concoct.", "if that something does unplug is right that it swaps is not incorrect.", "the Friesian is a kind of a buckthorn and it unplugs." ]
[ "The fact that something repositions refreshment is not incorrect.", "The fact that something re-positions refreshment is not incorrect.", "It's not incorrect that something repositions refreshment and concocts." ]
The fact that something repositions refreshment is not incorrect.
the Friesian does suffer philatelist if something repositions refreshment and it does concoct.
the Friesian does swap and it repositions chinaberry.
sent1: the Friesian is a kind of a buckthorn and it unplugs. sent2: if that the tassel does unplug and is not a buckthorn is wrong then that it does not unplug is correct. sent3: the Friesian does suffer philatelist if something repositions refreshment and it does concoct. sent4: the Guatemalan does not unplug. sent5: something does reposition refreshment. sent6: if that something does unplug is right that it swaps is not incorrect. sent7: the fact that something does reposition refreshment and concocts is not incorrect. sent8: that the tassel does unplug and is not a buckthorn is wrong if there is something such that it does not unplug. sent9: if the tassel does not unplug then that the Rollerblade suffers philatelist and it concocts does not hold.
({E}{a} & {D}{a})
sent1: ({G}{a} & {F}{a}) sent2: ¬({F}{c} & ¬{G}{c}) -> ¬{F}{c} sent3: (x): ({A}x & {B}x) -> {C}{a} sent4: ¬{F}{d} sent5: (Ex): {A}x sent6: (x): {F}x -> {E}x sent7: (Ex): ({A}x & {B}x) sent8: (x): ¬{F}x -> ¬({F}{c} & ¬{G}{c}) sent9: ¬{F}{c} -> ¬({C}{b} & {B}{b})
[ "sent7 & sent3 -> int1: that the Friesian suffers philatelist is correct.; sent6 -> int2: the Friesian swaps if it does unplug.; sent1 -> int3: the Friesian does unplug.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that the Friesian swaps is right.;" ]
UNKNOWN
[ "sent7 & sent3 -> int1: {C}{a}; sent6 -> int2: {F}{a} -> {E}{a}; sent1 -> int3: {F}{a}; int2 & int3 -> int4: {E}{a};" ]
UNKNOWN
3
null
5
0
5
the Friesian is a setter and it repositions refreshment.
({GD}{a} & {A}{a})
7
[ "sent4 -> int5: there exists something such that that it does not unplug is correct.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the fact that the tassel does unplug but it is not a kind of a buckthorn is not true.; sent2 & int6 -> int7: the tassel does not unplug.; sent9 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the Rollerblade does suffer philatelist and it does concoct does not hold.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that the fact that it does suffer philatelist and it does concoct is not true.;" ]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the Friesian does swap and it repositions chinaberry. ; $context$ = sent1: the Friesian is a kind of a buckthorn and it unplugs. sent2: if that the tassel does unplug and is not a buckthorn is wrong then that it does not unplug is correct. sent3: the Friesian does suffer philatelist if something repositions refreshment and it does concoct. sent4: the Guatemalan does not unplug. sent5: something does reposition refreshment. sent6: if that something does unplug is right that it swaps is not incorrect. sent7: the fact that something does reposition refreshment and concocts is not incorrect. sent8: that the tassel does unplug and is not a buckthorn is wrong if there is something such that it does not unplug. sent9: if the tassel does not unplug then that the Rollerblade suffers philatelist and it concocts does not hold. ; $proof$ =
__UNKNOWN__
DeductionInstance
the fact that something does reposition refreshment and concocts is not incorrect.
[ "the Friesian does suffer philatelist if something repositions refreshment and it does concoct.", "if that something does unplug is right that it swaps is not incorrect.", "the Friesian is a kind of a buckthorn and it unplugs." ]
[ "The fact that something repositions refreshment is not incorrect.", "The fact that something re-positions refreshment is not incorrect.", "It's not incorrect that something repositions refreshment and concocts." ]
The fact that something re-positions refreshment is not incorrect.
if that something does unplug is right that it swaps is not incorrect.
the Friesian does swap and it repositions chinaberry.
sent1: the Friesian is a kind of a buckthorn and it unplugs. sent2: if that the tassel does unplug and is not a buckthorn is wrong then that it does not unplug is correct. sent3: the Friesian does suffer philatelist if something repositions refreshment and it does concoct. sent4: the Guatemalan does not unplug. sent5: something does reposition refreshment. sent6: if that something does unplug is right that it swaps is not incorrect. sent7: the fact that something does reposition refreshment and concocts is not incorrect. sent8: that the tassel does unplug and is not a buckthorn is wrong if there is something such that it does not unplug. sent9: if the tassel does not unplug then that the Rollerblade suffers philatelist and it concocts does not hold.
({E}{a} & {D}{a})
sent1: ({G}{a} & {F}{a}) sent2: ¬({F}{c} & ¬{G}{c}) -> ¬{F}{c} sent3: (x): ({A}x & {B}x) -> {C}{a} sent4: ¬{F}{d} sent5: (Ex): {A}x sent6: (x): {F}x -> {E}x sent7: (Ex): ({A}x & {B}x) sent8: (x): ¬{F}x -> ¬({F}{c} & ¬{G}{c}) sent9: ¬{F}{c} -> ¬({C}{b} & {B}{b})
[ "sent7 & sent3 -> int1: that the Friesian suffers philatelist is correct.; sent6 -> int2: the Friesian swaps if it does unplug.; sent1 -> int3: the Friesian does unplug.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that the Friesian swaps is right.;" ]
UNKNOWN
[ "sent7 & sent3 -> int1: {C}{a}; sent6 -> int2: {F}{a} -> {E}{a}; sent1 -> int3: {F}{a}; int2 & int3 -> int4: {E}{a};" ]
UNKNOWN
3
null
5
0
5
the Friesian is a setter and it repositions refreshment.
({GD}{a} & {A}{a})
7
[ "sent4 -> int5: there exists something such that that it does not unplug is correct.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the fact that the tassel does unplug but it is not a kind of a buckthorn is not true.; sent2 & int6 -> int7: the tassel does not unplug.; sent9 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the Rollerblade does suffer philatelist and it does concoct does not hold.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that the fact that it does suffer philatelist and it does concoct is not true.;" ]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the Friesian does swap and it repositions chinaberry. ; $context$ = sent1: the Friesian is a kind of a buckthorn and it unplugs. sent2: if that the tassel does unplug and is not a buckthorn is wrong then that it does not unplug is correct. sent3: the Friesian does suffer philatelist if something repositions refreshment and it does concoct. sent4: the Guatemalan does not unplug. sent5: something does reposition refreshment. sent6: if that something does unplug is right that it swaps is not incorrect. sent7: the fact that something does reposition refreshment and concocts is not incorrect. sent8: that the tassel does unplug and is not a buckthorn is wrong if there is something such that it does not unplug. sent9: if the tassel does not unplug then that the Rollerblade suffers philatelist and it concocts does not hold. ; $proof$ =
__UNKNOWN__
DeductionInstance
the fact that something does reposition refreshment and concocts is not incorrect.
[ "the Friesian does suffer philatelist if something repositions refreshment and it does concoct.", "if that something does unplug is right that it swaps is not incorrect.", "the Friesian is a kind of a buckthorn and it unplugs." ]
[ "The fact that something repositions refreshment is not incorrect.", "The fact that something re-positions refreshment is not incorrect.", "It's not incorrect that something repositions refreshment and concocts." ]
It's not incorrect that something repositions refreshment and concocts.
the Friesian is a kind of a buckthorn and it unplugs.
the shielding is not a kind of a rouge.
sent1: if the shielding does not recommend squill and does not reposition Vespidae it is not aroid. sent2: if something repositions Trajan then it is not a personification. sent3: the fact that the shielding is not a Bohemian but it repositions moment is not correct. sent4: if something is implacable the fact that it is not an irregular is not false. sent5: the shielding is not an alpaca. sent6: if the shielding is Bohemian then the fact that it is not a rouge is not wrong. sent7: something rouges and repositions Solanopteris if the fact that it is not aroid hold. sent8: something is not a kind of a anxiolytic if that it is not a kind of a closet and recommends Mandalay is incorrect. sent9: the shielding is spectral if the fact that it does not recommend Karen is not wrong. sent10: something is not parotid if it is a orchil. sent11: that the ready-mix is non-damascene thing that does rouge is not true. sent12: that the mazer is a kind of a Bohemian and it is a taste is false. sent13: the shielding does not grapple if the fact that it is not Bohemian and does reposition copepod does not hold. sent14: if something recommends aldose it is unsavory. sent15: something does not recommend squill and does not reposition Vespidae if it is spectral. sent16: if the shielding is a splash and not a Threskiornithidae then it does not recommend Karen. sent17: that the isoantibody recommends incivility and it is a Bohemian is wrong. sent18: that the shielding is impartial and it does recommend isoantibody is not true. sent19: the squill does not reposition moment.
¬{B}{aa}
sent1: (¬{E}{aa} & ¬{D}{aa}) -> ¬{C}{aa} sent2: (x): {GB}x -> ¬{BM}x sent3: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent4: (x): {EJ}x -> ¬{HO}x sent5: ¬{AC}{aa} sent6: {AA}{aa} -> ¬{B}{aa} sent7: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({B}x & {A}x) sent8: (x): ¬(¬{HI}x & {FA}x) -> ¬{CH}x sent9: ¬{G}{aa} -> {F}{aa} sent10: (x): {CM}x -> ¬{BF}x sent11: ¬(¬{GU}{ha} & {B}{ha}) sent12: ¬({AA}{ca} & {IH}{ca}) sent13: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {FC}{aa}) -> ¬{AG}{aa} sent14: (x): {BP}x -> ¬{DR}x sent15: (x): {F}x -> (¬{E}x & ¬{D}x) sent16: ({H}{aa} & ¬{I}{aa}) -> ¬{G}{aa} sent17: ¬({DU}{ap} & {AA}{ap}) sent18: ¬({BS}{aa} & {AS}{aa}) sent19: ¬{AB}{dj}
[]
UNKNOWN
[]
UNKNOWN
2
null
18
0
18
the shielding is a rouge.
{B}{aa}
8
[ "sent7 -> int1: if the shielding is not aroid it does rouge and it repositions Solanopteris.; sent15 -> int2: the fact that the shielding does not recommend squill and does not reposition Vespidae is true if that it is spectral is not false.;" ]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the shielding is not a kind of a rouge. ; $context$ = sent1: if the shielding does not recommend squill and does not reposition Vespidae it is not aroid. sent2: if something repositions Trajan then it is not a personification. sent3: the fact that the shielding is not a Bohemian but it repositions moment is not correct. sent4: if something is implacable the fact that it is not an irregular is not false. sent5: the shielding is not an alpaca. sent6: if the shielding is Bohemian then the fact that it is not a rouge is not wrong. sent7: something rouges and repositions Solanopteris if the fact that it is not aroid hold. sent8: something is not a kind of a anxiolytic if that it is not a kind of a closet and recommends Mandalay is incorrect. sent9: the shielding is spectral if the fact that it does not recommend Karen is not wrong. sent10: something is not parotid if it is a orchil. sent11: that the ready-mix is non-damascene thing that does rouge is not true. sent12: that the mazer is a kind of a Bohemian and it is a taste is false. sent13: the shielding does not grapple if the fact that it is not Bohemian and does reposition copepod does not hold. sent14: if something recommends aldose it is unsavory. sent15: something does not recommend squill and does not reposition Vespidae if it is spectral. sent16: if the shielding is a splash and not a Threskiornithidae then it does not recommend Karen. sent17: that the isoantibody recommends incivility and it is a Bohemian is wrong. sent18: that the shielding is impartial and it does recommend isoantibody is not true. sent19: the squill does not reposition moment. ; $proof$ =
__UNKNOWN__
DeductionInstance
the shielding does not grapple if the fact that it is not Bohemian and does reposition copepod does not hold.
[ "that the shielding is impartial and it does recommend isoantibody is not true." ]
[ "the shielding does not grapple if the fact that it is not Bohemian and does reposition copepod does not hold." ]
the shielding does not grapple if the fact that it is not Bohemian and does reposition copepod does not hold.
that the shielding is impartial and it does recommend isoantibody is not true.
the forebear is not non-seaward or not a straight or both.
sent1: if the drawler is not seaward the forebear is a cerebrum or it is a straight or both. sent2: the solvate is a kind of a straight if the forebear is a cerebrum. sent3: if the Catawba suffers Bassia it repositions straightedge. sent4: the forebear either is a kind of a seaward or is a cerebrum or both. sent5: the solvate is a kind of a cerebrum. sent6: if the solvate is a cerebrum the forebear is a seaward. sent7: the fact that something is a seaward and/or is not a straight is false if it is a cerebrum. sent8: the Catawba suffers Bassia if there exists something such that the fact that it does not suffers Bassia and is not electrocardiographic does not hold. sent9: if that the solvate is a seaward is correct the forebear is a cerebrum. sent10: if there is something such that it does reposition straightedge then the Soma does not reposition incivility but it does suffer boa. sent11: something is a kind of a cerebrum if it is representational. sent12: the drawler does not oxidize if there is something such that that it does not reposition Bassia and does oxidize does not hold. sent13: that the earshot does not suffer Bassia and is not electrocardiographic is not right. sent14: if something does recommend Ugric that it does not reposition Bassia and does oxidize is false. sent15: the forebear repositions chrism. sent16: if the solvate is not representational or is a headspace or both then that the forebear is representational is correct. sent17: something recommends Ugric if it does not reposition incivility and it does suffer boa.
({B}{b} v ¬{C}{b})
sent1: ¬{B}{c} -> ({A}{b} v {C}{b}) sent2: {A}{b} -> {C}{a} sent3: {L}{e} -> {K}{e} sent4: ({B}{b} v {A}{b}) sent5: {A}{a} sent6: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} sent7: (x): {A}x -> ¬({B}x v ¬{C}x) sent8: (x): ¬(¬{L}x & ¬{N}x) -> {L}{e} sent9: {B}{a} -> {A}{b} sent10: (x): {K}x -> (¬{I}{d} & {J}{d}) sent11: (x): {D}x -> {A}x sent12: (x): ¬(¬{G}x & {F}x) -> ¬{F}{c} sent13: ¬(¬{L}{f} & ¬{N}{f}) sent14: (x): {H}x -> ¬(¬{G}x & {F}x) sent15: {ER}{b} sent16: (¬{D}{a} v {E}{a}) -> {D}{b} sent17: (x): (¬{I}x & {J}x) -> {H}x
[ "sent6 & sent5 -> int1: the fact that the forebear is a seaward is right.; int1 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
[ "sent6 & sent5 -> int1: {B}{b}; int1 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
2
2
15
0
15
the solvate is straight.
{C}{a}
6
[]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the forebear is not non-seaward or not a straight or both. ; $context$ = sent1: if the drawler is not seaward the forebear is a cerebrum or it is a straight or both. sent2: the solvate is a kind of a straight if the forebear is a cerebrum. sent3: if the Catawba suffers Bassia it repositions straightedge. sent4: the forebear either is a kind of a seaward or is a cerebrum or both. sent5: the solvate is a kind of a cerebrum. sent6: if the solvate is a cerebrum the forebear is a seaward. sent7: the fact that something is a seaward and/or is not a straight is false if it is a cerebrum. sent8: the Catawba suffers Bassia if there exists something such that the fact that it does not suffers Bassia and is not electrocardiographic does not hold. sent9: if that the solvate is a seaward is correct the forebear is a cerebrum. sent10: if there is something such that it does reposition straightedge then the Soma does not reposition incivility but it does suffer boa. sent11: something is a kind of a cerebrum if it is representational. sent12: the drawler does not oxidize if there is something such that that it does not reposition Bassia and does oxidize does not hold. sent13: that the earshot does not suffer Bassia and is not electrocardiographic is not right. sent14: if something does recommend Ugric that it does not reposition Bassia and does oxidize is false. sent15: the forebear repositions chrism. sent16: if the solvate is not representational or is a headspace or both then that the forebear is representational is correct. sent17: something recommends Ugric if it does not reposition incivility and it does suffer boa. ; $proof$ =
sent6 & sent5 -> int1: the fact that the forebear is a seaward is right.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
DeductionInstance
if the solvate is a cerebrum the forebear is a seaward.
[ "the solvate is a kind of a cerebrum." ]
[ "if the solvate is a cerebrum the forebear is a seaward." ]
if the solvate is a cerebrum the forebear is a seaward.
the solvate is a kind of a cerebrum.
the scorer does not suffer Trajan.
sent1: the scorer is not an infernal if the Meany is not a unresponsiveness. sent2: the Meany is a comedy but it is not a unresponsiveness. sent3: that something does not suffer Trajan is not wrong if that it is not a kind of an infernal is not wrong.
¬{D}{b}
sent1: ¬{B}{a} -> ¬{C}{b} sent2: ({A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) sent3: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬{D}x
[ "sent2 -> int1: the fact that the Meany is not a unresponsiveness is not wrong.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the scorer is not an infernal.; sent3 -> int3: the scorer does not suffer Trajan if it is not an infernal.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
[ "sent2 -> int1: ¬{B}{a}; int1 & sent1 -> int2: ¬{C}{b}; sent3 -> int3: ¬{C}{b} -> ¬{D}{b}; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
3
3
0
0
0
null
null
null
[]
null
null
$hypothesis$ = the scorer does not suffer Trajan. ; $context$ = sent1: the scorer is not an infernal if the Meany is not a unresponsiveness. sent2: the Meany is a comedy but it is not a unresponsiveness. sent3: that something does not suffer Trajan is not wrong if that it is not a kind of an infernal is not wrong. ; $proof$ =
sent2 -> int1: the fact that the Meany is not a unresponsiveness is not wrong.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the scorer is not an infernal.; sent3 -> int3: the scorer does not suffer Trajan if it is not an infernal.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
DeductionInstance
the Meany is a comedy but it is not a unresponsiveness.
[ "the scorer is not an infernal if the Meany is not a unresponsiveness.", "that something does not suffer Trajan is not wrong if that it is not a kind of an infernal is not wrong." ]
[ "The Meany is a comedy.", "The Meany is not a comedy that is unresponsive." ]
The Meany is a comedy.
the scorer is not an infernal if the Meany is not a unresponsiveness.
the scorer does not suffer Trajan.
sent1: the scorer is not an infernal if the Meany is not a unresponsiveness. sent2: the Meany is a comedy but it is not a unresponsiveness. sent3: that something does not suffer Trajan is not wrong if that it is not a kind of an infernal is not wrong.
¬{D}{b}
sent1: ¬{B}{a} -> ¬{C}{b} sent2: ({A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) sent3: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬{D}x
[ "sent2 -> int1: the fact that the Meany is not a unresponsiveness is not wrong.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the scorer is not an infernal.; sent3 -> int3: the scorer does not suffer Trajan if it is not an infernal.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
[ "sent2 -> int1: ¬{B}{a}; int1 & sent1 -> int2: ¬{C}{b}; sent3 -> int3: ¬{C}{b} -> ¬{D}{b}; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
3
3
0
0
0
null
null
null
[]
null
null
$hypothesis$ = the scorer does not suffer Trajan. ; $context$ = sent1: the scorer is not an infernal if the Meany is not a unresponsiveness. sent2: the Meany is a comedy but it is not a unresponsiveness. sent3: that something does not suffer Trajan is not wrong if that it is not a kind of an infernal is not wrong. ; $proof$ =
sent2 -> int1: the fact that the Meany is not a unresponsiveness is not wrong.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the scorer is not an infernal.; sent3 -> int3: the scorer does not suffer Trajan if it is not an infernal.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
DeductionInstance
the Meany is a comedy but it is not a unresponsiveness.
[ "the scorer is not an infernal if the Meany is not a unresponsiveness.", "that something does not suffer Trajan is not wrong if that it is not a kind of an infernal is not wrong." ]
[ "The Meany is a comedy.", "The Meany is not a comedy that is unresponsive." ]
The Meany is not a comedy that is unresponsive.
that something does not suffer Trajan is not wrong if that it is not a kind of an infernal is not wrong.
the crouch does not occur.
sent1: if the hydrodynamicsness occurs and the literariness occurs that the quotableness occurs is false. sent2: that the crouching does not occur is caused by that the repositioning crankcase and the quotableness happens. sent3: if the Keynesian does not occur then the hydrodynamicsness occurs and the shopping happens. sent4: if that the suffering radiocarbon happens but the shopping does not occur is not correct the shopping occurs. sent5: the crouch occurs if that the repositioning crankcase happens and the crouch does not occur is false. sent6: the honorableness and the repositioning crankcase happens if the quotableness does not occur. sent7: if the hydrodynamicsness does not occur then the fact that the literariness does not occur and the crouch does not occur is not correct. sent8: the deflationariness happens. sent9: the quotableness occurs. sent10: that not the hydrodynamicsness but the do occurs is brought about by the Keynesianness. sent11: the Keynesian happens and the curatorship happens. sent12: the recommending sulfisoxazole happens if the fact that the shopping happens hold. sent13: if the probation happens then that the suffering radiocarbon occurs and the shopping does not occur is incorrect. sent14: the repositioning crankcase occurs. sent15: if the quotableness does not occur the fact that the repositioning crankcase happens but the crouching does not occur is wrong.
¬{C}
sent1: ({E} & {D}) -> ¬{B} sent2: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} sent3: ¬{J} -> ({E} & {G}) sent4: ¬({H} & ¬{G}) -> {G} sent5: ¬({A} & ¬{C}) -> {C} sent6: ¬{B} -> ({I} & {A}) sent7: ¬{E} -> ¬(¬{D} & ¬{C}) sent8: {HB} sent9: {B} sent10: {J} -> (¬{E} & {F}) sent11: ({J} & {K}) sent12: {G} -> {IP} sent13: {L} -> ¬({H} & ¬{G}) sent14: {A} sent15: ¬{B} -> ¬({A} & ¬{C})
[ "sent14 & sent9 -> int1: both the repositioning crankcase and the quotableness happens.; sent2 & int1 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
[ "sent14 & sent9 -> int1: ({A} & {B}); sent2 & int1 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
2
2
12
0
12
the crouching occurs.
{C}
7
[]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the crouch does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the hydrodynamicsness occurs and the literariness occurs that the quotableness occurs is false. sent2: that the crouching does not occur is caused by that the repositioning crankcase and the quotableness happens. sent3: if the Keynesian does not occur then the hydrodynamicsness occurs and the shopping happens. sent4: if that the suffering radiocarbon happens but the shopping does not occur is not correct the shopping occurs. sent5: the crouch occurs if that the repositioning crankcase happens and the crouch does not occur is false. sent6: the honorableness and the repositioning crankcase happens if the quotableness does not occur. sent7: if the hydrodynamicsness does not occur then the fact that the literariness does not occur and the crouch does not occur is not correct. sent8: the deflationariness happens. sent9: the quotableness occurs. sent10: that not the hydrodynamicsness but the do occurs is brought about by the Keynesianness. sent11: the Keynesian happens and the curatorship happens. sent12: the recommending sulfisoxazole happens if the fact that the shopping happens hold. sent13: if the probation happens then that the suffering radiocarbon occurs and the shopping does not occur is incorrect. sent14: the repositioning crankcase occurs. sent15: if the quotableness does not occur the fact that the repositioning crankcase happens but the crouching does not occur is wrong. ; $proof$ =
sent14 & sent9 -> int1: both the repositioning crankcase and the quotableness happens.; sent2 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
DeductionInstance
the repositioning crankcase occurs.
[ "the quotableness occurs.", "that the crouching does not occur is caused by that the repositioning crankcase and the quotableness happens." ]
[ "There is a repositioning of the crankcase.", "The crankcase is moved." ]
There is a repositioning of the crankcase.
the quotableness occurs.
the crouch does not occur.
sent1: if the hydrodynamicsness occurs and the literariness occurs that the quotableness occurs is false. sent2: that the crouching does not occur is caused by that the repositioning crankcase and the quotableness happens. sent3: if the Keynesian does not occur then the hydrodynamicsness occurs and the shopping happens. sent4: if that the suffering radiocarbon happens but the shopping does not occur is not correct the shopping occurs. sent5: the crouch occurs if that the repositioning crankcase happens and the crouch does not occur is false. sent6: the honorableness and the repositioning crankcase happens if the quotableness does not occur. sent7: if the hydrodynamicsness does not occur then the fact that the literariness does not occur and the crouch does not occur is not correct. sent8: the deflationariness happens. sent9: the quotableness occurs. sent10: that not the hydrodynamicsness but the do occurs is brought about by the Keynesianness. sent11: the Keynesian happens and the curatorship happens. sent12: the recommending sulfisoxazole happens if the fact that the shopping happens hold. sent13: if the probation happens then that the suffering radiocarbon occurs and the shopping does not occur is incorrect. sent14: the repositioning crankcase occurs. sent15: if the quotableness does not occur the fact that the repositioning crankcase happens but the crouching does not occur is wrong.
¬{C}
sent1: ({E} & {D}) -> ¬{B} sent2: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} sent3: ¬{J} -> ({E} & {G}) sent4: ¬({H} & ¬{G}) -> {G} sent5: ¬({A} & ¬{C}) -> {C} sent6: ¬{B} -> ({I} & {A}) sent7: ¬{E} -> ¬(¬{D} & ¬{C}) sent8: {HB} sent9: {B} sent10: {J} -> (¬{E} & {F}) sent11: ({J} & {K}) sent12: {G} -> {IP} sent13: {L} -> ¬({H} & ¬{G}) sent14: {A} sent15: ¬{B} -> ¬({A} & ¬{C})
[ "sent14 & sent9 -> int1: both the repositioning crankcase and the quotableness happens.; sent2 & int1 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
[ "sent14 & sent9 -> int1: ({A} & {B}); sent2 & int1 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
2
2
12
0
12
the crouching occurs.
{C}
7
[]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the crouch does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the hydrodynamicsness occurs and the literariness occurs that the quotableness occurs is false. sent2: that the crouching does not occur is caused by that the repositioning crankcase and the quotableness happens. sent3: if the Keynesian does not occur then the hydrodynamicsness occurs and the shopping happens. sent4: if that the suffering radiocarbon happens but the shopping does not occur is not correct the shopping occurs. sent5: the crouch occurs if that the repositioning crankcase happens and the crouch does not occur is false. sent6: the honorableness and the repositioning crankcase happens if the quotableness does not occur. sent7: if the hydrodynamicsness does not occur then the fact that the literariness does not occur and the crouch does not occur is not correct. sent8: the deflationariness happens. sent9: the quotableness occurs. sent10: that not the hydrodynamicsness but the do occurs is brought about by the Keynesianness. sent11: the Keynesian happens and the curatorship happens. sent12: the recommending sulfisoxazole happens if the fact that the shopping happens hold. sent13: if the probation happens then that the suffering radiocarbon occurs and the shopping does not occur is incorrect. sent14: the repositioning crankcase occurs. sent15: if the quotableness does not occur the fact that the repositioning crankcase happens but the crouching does not occur is wrong. ; $proof$ =
sent14 & sent9 -> int1: both the repositioning crankcase and the quotableness happens.; sent2 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
DeductionInstance
the repositioning crankcase occurs.
[ "the quotableness occurs.", "that the crouching does not occur is caused by that the repositioning crankcase and the quotableness happens." ]
[ "There is a repositioning of the crankcase.", "The crankcase is moved." ]
The crankcase is moved.
that the crouching does not occur is caused by that the repositioning crankcase and the quotableness happens.
the fact that the zither is idiopathic but it does not suffer elater is not false.
sent1: the fact that the nucleoside is a Omani and it does dunk is not right if there exists something such that it does suffer aerophilately. sent2: the zither is idiopathic. sent3: if the nucleoside is post-communist the tocsin does squinch. sent4: if something is post-communist the fact that it is idiopathic and it does not suffer elater is false. sent5: the tocsin does suffer aerophilately. sent6: something is post-communist and it squinches if it is not a kind of a dunk. sent7: if the tocsin does squinch the zither is idiopathic thing that does not suffer elater.
({C}{c} & ¬{D}{c})
sent1: (x): {F}x -> ¬({G}{a} & {E}{a}) sent2: {C}{c} sent3: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} sent4: (x): {A}x -> ¬({C}x & ¬{D}x) sent5: {F}{b} sent6: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({A}x & {B}x) sent7: {B}{b} -> ({C}{c} & ¬{D}{c})
[]
UNKNOWN
[]
UNKNOWN
2
null
5
0
5
that the zither is idiopathic but it does not suffer elater is false.
¬({C}{c} & ¬{D}{c})
7
[ "sent4 -> int1: if the fact that the zither is post-communist is correct that it is idiopathic and it does not suffer elater is false.; sent6 -> int2: if the zither is not a kind of a dunk then it is post-communist and does squinch.; sent5 -> int3: there exists something such that it suffers aerophilately.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: that the nucleoside is a Omani that does dunk does not hold.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that that it is both a Omani and a dunk does not hold.;" ]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the zither is idiopathic but it does not suffer elater is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the nucleoside is a Omani and it does dunk is not right if there exists something such that it does suffer aerophilately. sent2: the zither is idiopathic. sent3: if the nucleoside is post-communist the tocsin does squinch. sent4: if something is post-communist the fact that it is idiopathic and it does not suffer elater is false. sent5: the tocsin does suffer aerophilately. sent6: something is post-communist and it squinches if it is not a kind of a dunk. sent7: if the tocsin does squinch the zither is idiopathic thing that does not suffer elater. ; $proof$ =
__UNKNOWN__
DeductionInstance
the zither is idiopathic.
[ "the tocsin does suffer aerophilately." ]
[ "the zither is idiopathic." ]
the zither is idiopathic.
the tocsin does suffer aerophilately.
the fact that the sawhorse is feverish and it does recommend Karen is not wrong.
sent1: if something does not recommend bandsaw it does reposition naphthoquinone and is linguistics. sent2: if the sawhorse does not suffer Kivu then it suffers superannuation and is a miscarriage. sent3: something recommends Karen and/or it does suffer balkline if it is non-feverish. sent4: something is feverish if the fact that it suffers Kivu and does not prevent is wrong. sent5: the evacuee is prejudicial if the mazer is prejudicial. sent6: the embankment is not feverish if the Capital is feverish and calculates. sent7: if something is dysplastic then it is feverish. sent8: if something repositions curbside then it is feverish. sent9: there is something such that it is a litigiousness. sent10: if that the heliozoan repositions naphthoquinone hold then that it recommends Northern and it does not shuck is not right. sent11: the sawhorse repositions naphthoquinone and does suffer balkline. sent12: the Capital does calculate if the bandsaw does reposition naphthoquinone. sent13: either something repositions curbside or it is dysplastic or both if it is not a kind of a Siberian. sent14: if there exists something such that it is a litigiousness the bandsaw does not recommend bandsaw. sent15: the hogchoker does closet. sent16: the sawhorse is not linguistics. sent17: if that something is feverish and it does reposition naphthoquinone is not correct it is not feverish. sent18: if the evacuee is prejudicial the Capital is non-Siberian and it is not a mesh. sent19: the fact that something is a hayrack and not a poliovirus is wrong if it does suffer balkline. sent20: something suffers satang if it does closet. sent21: if the embankment recommends Karen the convictfish suffers balkline. sent22: the mazer is prejudicial if the hogchoker suffers satang. sent23: that something calculates and it does recommend Karen is not false if it is not linguistics. sent24: if the embankment does suffer balkline the convictfish does suffer balkline.
({B}{aa} & {C}{aa})
sent1: (x): ¬{M}x -> ({D}x & {F}x) sent2: ¬{AA}{aa} -> ({CJ}{aa} & {CR}{aa}) sent3: (x): ¬{B}x -> ({C}x v {A}x) sent4: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x sent5: {K}{e} -> {K}{d} sent6: ({B}{b} & {E}{b}) -> ¬{B}{a} sent7: (x): {G}x -> {B}x sent8: (x): {H}x -> {B}x sent9: (Ex): {N}x sent10: {D}{de} -> ¬({HU}{de} & ¬{GS}{de}) sent11: ({D}{aa} & {A}{aa}) sent12: {D}{c} -> {E}{b} sent13: (x): ¬{I}x -> ({H}x v {G}x) sent14: (x): {N}x -> ¬{M}{c} sent15: {O}{f} sent16: ¬{F}{aa} sent17: (x): ¬({B}x & {D}x) -> ¬{B}x sent18: {K}{d} -> (¬{I}{b} & ¬{J}{b}) sent19: (x): {A}x -> ¬({EH}x & ¬{FC}x) sent20: (x): {O}x -> {L}x sent21: {C}{a} -> {A}{hs} sent22: {L}{f} -> {K}{e} sent23: (x): ¬{F}x -> ({E}x & {C}x) sent24: {A}{a} -> {A}{hs}
[ "sent11 -> int1: the fact that the sawhorse does suffer balkline is not false.; sent4 -> int2: if that the sawhorse suffers Kivu but it does not prevent does not hold it is feverish.; sent23 -> int3: the sawhorse does calculate and it recommends Karen if the fact that it is not linguistics is correct.; int3 & sent16 -> int4: the sawhorse does calculate and it recommends Karen.; int4 -> int5: the sawhorse recommends Karen.;" ]
UNKNOWN
[ "sent11 -> int1: {A}{aa}; sent4 -> int2: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa}; sent23 -> int3: ¬{F}{aa} -> ({E}{aa} & {C}{aa}); int3 & sent16 -> int4: ({E}{aa} & {C}{aa}); int4 -> int5: {C}{aa};" ]
UNKNOWN
4
null
20
0
20
that the sawhorse is feverish and recommends Karen is not right.
¬({B}{aa} & {C}{aa})
5
[ "sent17 -> int6: if that the embankment is feverish and does reposition naphthoquinone does not hold it is not feverish.;" ]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the sawhorse is feverish and it does recommend Karen is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does not recommend bandsaw it does reposition naphthoquinone and is linguistics. sent2: if the sawhorse does not suffer Kivu then it suffers superannuation and is a miscarriage. sent3: something recommends Karen and/or it does suffer balkline if it is non-feverish. sent4: something is feverish if the fact that it suffers Kivu and does not prevent is wrong. sent5: the evacuee is prejudicial if the mazer is prejudicial. sent6: the embankment is not feverish if the Capital is feverish and calculates. sent7: if something is dysplastic then it is feverish. sent8: if something repositions curbside then it is feverish. sent9: there is something such that it is a litigiousness. sent10: if that the heliozoan repositions naphthoquinone hold then that it recommends Northern and it does not shuck is not right. sent11: the sawhorse repositions naphthoquinone and does suffer balkline. sent12: the Capital does calculate if the bandsaw does reposition naphthoquinone. sent13: either something repositions curbside or it is dysplastic or both if it is not a kind of a Siberian. sent14: if there exists something such that it is a litigiousness the bandsaw does not recommend bandsaw. sent15: the hogchoker does closet. sent16: the sawhorse is not linguistics. sent17: if that something is feverish and it does reposition naphthoquinone is not correct it is not feverish. sent18: if the evacuee is prejudicial the Capital is non-Siberian and it is not a mesh. sent19: the fact that something is a hayrack and not a poliovirus is wrong if it does suffer balkline. sent20: something suffers satang if it does closet. sent21: if the embankment recommends Karen the convictfish suffers balkline. sent22: the mazer is prejudicial if the hogchoker suffers satang. sent23: that something calculates and it does recommend Karen is not false if it is not linguistics. sent24: if the embankment does suffer balkline the convictfish does suffer balkline. ; $proof$ =
__UNKNOWN__
DeductionInstance
the sawhorse repositions naphthoquinone and does suffer balkline.
[ "something is feverish if the fact that it suffers Kivu and does not prevent is wrong.", "that something calculates and it does recommend Karen is not false if it is not linguistics.", "the sawhorse is not linguistics." ]
[ "The saw horse has a problem with naphthoquinone.", "The sawhorse has a problem with naphthoquinone.", "The sawhorse has problems with naphthoquinone." ]
The saw horse has a problem with naphthoquinone.
something is feverish if the fact that it suffers Kivu and does not prevent is wrong.
the fact that the sawhorse is feverish and it does recommend Karen is not wrong.
sent1: if something does not recommend bandsaw it does reposition naphthoquinone and is linguistics. sent2: if the sawhorse does not suffer Kivu then it suffers superannuation and is a miscarriage. sent3: something recommends Karen and/or it does suffer balkline if it is non-feverish. sent4: something is feverish if the fact that it suffers Kivu and does not prevent is wrong. sent5: the evacuee is prejudicial if the mazer is prejudicial. sent6: the embankment is not feverish if the Capital is feverish and calculates. sent7: if something is dysplastic then it is feverish. sent8: if something repositions curbside then it is feverish. sent9: there is something such that it is a litigiousness. sent10: if that the heliozoan repositions naphthoquinone hold then that it recommends Northern and it does not shuck is not right. sent11: the sawhorse repositions naphthoquinone and does suffer balkline. sent12: the Capital does calculate if the bandsaw does reposition naphthoquinone. sent13: either something repositions curbside or it is dysplastic or both if it is not a kind of a Siberian. sent14: if there exists something such that it is a litigiousness the bandsaw does not recommend bandsaw. sent15: the hogchoker does closet. sent16: the sawhorse is not linguistics. sent17: if that something is feverish and it does reposition naphthoquinone is not correct it is not feverish. sent18: if the evacuee is prejudicial the Capital is non-Siberian and it is not a mesh. sent19: the fact that something is a hayrack and not a poliovirus is wrong if it does suffer balkline. sent20: something suffers satang if it does closet. sent21: if the embankment recommends Karen the convictfish suffers balkline. sent22: the mazer is prejudicial if the hogchoker suffers satang. sent23: that something calculates and it does recommend Karen is not false if it is not linguistics. sent24: if the embankment does suffer balkline the convictfish does suffer balkline.
({B}{aa} & {C}{aa})
sent1: (x): ¬{M}x -> ({D}x & {F}x) sent2: ¬{AA}{aa} -> ({CJ}{aa} & {CR}{aa}) sent3: (x): ¬{B}x -> ({C}x v {A}x) sent4: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x sent5: {K}{e} -> {K}{d} sent6: ({B}{b} & {E}{b}) -> ¬{B}{a} sent7: (x): {G}x -> {B}x sent8: (x): {H}x -> {B}x sent9: (Ex): {N}x sent10: {D}{de} -> ¬({HU}{de} & ¬{GS}{de}) sent11: ({D}{aa} & {A}{aa}) sent12: {D}{c} -> {E}{b} sent13: (x): ¬{I}x -> ({H}x v {G}x) sent14: (x): {N}x -> ¬{M}{c} sent15: {O}{f} sent16: ¬{F}{aa} sent17: (x): ¬({B}x & {D}x) -> ¬{B}x sent18: {K}{d} -> (¬{I}{b} & ¬{J}{b}) sent19: (x): {A}x -> ¬({EH}x & ¬{FC}x) sent20: (x): {O}x -> {L}x sent21: {C}{a} -> {A}{hs} sent22: {L}{f} -> {K}{e} sent23: (x): ¬{F}x -> ({E}x & {C}x) sent24: {A}{a} -> {A}{hs}
[ "sent11 -> int1: the fact that the sawhorse does suffer balkline is not false.; sent4 -> int2: if that the sawhorse suffers Kivu but it does not prevent does not hold it is feverish.; sent23 -> int3: the sawhorse does calculate and it recommends Karen if the fact that it is not linguistics is correct.; int3 & sent16 -> int4: the sawhorse does calculate and it recommends Karen.; int4 -> int5: the sawhorse recommends Karen.;" ]
UNKNOWN
[ "sent11 -> int1: {A}{aa}; sent4 -> int2: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa}; sent23 -> int3: ¬{F}{aa} -> ({E}{aa} & {C}{aa}); int3 & sent16 -> int4: ({E}{aa} & {C}{aa}); int4 -> int5: {C}{aa};" ]
UNKNOWN
4
null
20
0
20
that the sawhorse is feverish and recommends Karen is not right.
¬({B}{aa} & {C}{aa})
5
[ "sent17 -> int6: if that the embankment is feverish and does reposition naphthoquinone does not hold it is not feverish.;" ]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the sawhorse is feverish and it does recommend Karen is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does not recommend bandsaw it does reposition naphthoquinone and is linguistics. sent2: if the sawhorse does not suffer Kivu then it suffers superannuation and is a miscarriage. sent3: something recommends Karen and/or it does suffer balkline if it is non-feverish. sent4: something is feverish if the fact that it suffers Kivu and does not prevent is wrong. sent5: the evacuee is prejudicial if the mazer is prejudicial. sent6: the embankment is not feverish if the Capital is feverish and calculates. sent7: if something is dysplastic then it is feverish. sent8: if something repositions curbside then it is feverish. sent9: there is something such that it is a litigiousness. sent10: if that the heliozoan repositions naphthoquinone hold then that it recommends Northern and it does not shuck is not right. sent11: the sawhorse repositions naphthoquinone and does suffer balkline. sent12: the Capital does calculate if the bandsaw does reposition naphthoquinone. sent13: either something repositions curbside or it is dysplastic or both if it is not a kind of a Siberian. sent14: if there exists something such that it is a litigiousness the bandsaw does not recommend bandsaw. sent15: the hogchoker does closet. sent16: the sawhorse is not linguistics. sent17: if that something is feverish and it does reposition naphthoquinone is not correct it is not feverish. sent18: if the evacuee is prejudicial the Capital is non-Siberian and it is not a mesh. sent19: the fact that something is a hayrack and not a poliovirus is wrong if it does suffer balkline. sent20: something suffers satang if it does closet. sent21: if the embankment recommends Karen the convictfish suffers balkline. sent22: the mazer is prejudicial if the hogchoker suffers satang. sent23: that something calculates and it does recommend Karen is not false if it is not linguistics. sent24: if the embankment does suffer balkline the convictfish does suffer balkline. ; $proof$ =
__UNKNOWN__
DeductionInstance
the sawhorse repositions naphthoquinone and does suffer balkline.
[ "something is feverish if the fact that it suffers Kivu and does not prevent is wrong.", "that something calculates and it does recommend Karen is not false if it is not linguistics.", "the sawhorse is not linguistics." ]
[ "The saw horse has a problem with naphthoquinone.", "The sawhorse has a problem with naphthoquinone.", "The sawhorse has problems with naphthoquinone." ]
The sawhorse has a problem with naphthoquinone.
that something calculates and it does recommend Karen is not false if it is not linguistics.
the fact that the sawhorse is feverish and it does recommend Karen is not wrong.
sent1: if something does not recommend bandsaw it does reposition naphthoquinone and is linguistics. sent2: if the sawhorse does not suffer Kivu then it suffers superannuation and is a miscarriage. sent3: something recommends Karen and/or it does suffer balkline if it is non-feverish. sent4: something is feverish if the fact that it suffers Kivu and does not prevent is wrong. sent5: the evacuee is prejudicial if the mazer is prejudicial. sent6: the embankment is not feverish if the Capital is feverish and calculates. sent7: if something is dysplastic then it is feverish. sent8: if something repositions curbside then it is feverish. sent9: there is something such that it is a litigiousness. sent10: if that the heliozoan repositions naphthoquinone hold then that it recommends Northern and it does not shuck is not right. sent11: the sawhorse repositions naphthoquinone and does suffer balkline. sent12: the Capital does calculate if the bandsaw does reposition naphthoquinone. sent13: either something repositions curbside or it is dysplastic or both if it is not a kind of a Siberian. sent14: if there exists something such that it is a litigiousness the bandsaw does not recommend bandsaw. sent15: the hogchoker does closet. sent16: the sawhorse is not linguistics. sent17: if that something is feverish and it does reposition naphthoquinone is not correct it is not feverish. sent18: if the evacuee is prejudicial the Capital is non-Siberian and it is not a mesh. sent19: the fact that something is a hayrack and not a poliovirus is wrong if it does suffer balkline. sent20: something suffers satang if it does closet. sent21: if the embankment recommends Karen the convictfish suffers balkline. sent22: the mazer is prejudicial if the hogchoker suffers satang. sent23: that something calculates and it does recommend Karen is not false if it is not linguistics. sent24: if the embankment does suffer balkline the convictfish does suffer balkline.
({B}{aa} & {C}{aa})
sent1: (x): ¬{M}x -> ({D}x & {F}x) sent2: ¬{AA}{aa} -> ({CJ}{aa} & {CR}{aa}) sent3: (x): ¬{B}x -> ({C}x v {A}x) sent4: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x sent5: {K}{e} -> {K}{d} sent6: ({B}{b} & {E}{b}) -> ¬{B}{a} sent7: (x): {G}x -> {B}x sent8: (x): {H}x -> {B}x sent9: (Ex): {N}x sent10: {D}{de} -> ¬({HU}{de} & ¬{GS}{de}) sent11: ({D}{aa} & {A}{aa}) sent12: {D}{c} -> {E}{b} sent13: (x): ¬{I}x -> ({H}x v {G}x) sent14: (x): {N}x -> ¬{M}{c} sent15: {O}{f} sent16: ¬{F}{aa} sent17: (x): ¬({B}x & {D}x) -> ¬{B}x sent18: {K}{d} -> (¬{I}{b} & ¬{J}{b}) sent19: (x): {A}x -> ¬({EH}x & ¬{FC}x) sent20: (x): {O}x -> {L}x sent21: {C}{a} -> {A}{hs} sent22: {L}{f} -> {K}{e} sent23: (x): ¬{F}x -> ({E}x & {C}x) sent24: {A}{a} -> {A}{hs}
[ "sent11 -> int1: the fact that the sawhorse does suffer balkline is not false.; sent4 -> int2: if that the sawhorse suffers Kivu but it does not prevent does not hold it is feverish.; sent23 -> int3: the sawhorse does calculate and it recommends Karen if the fact that it is not linguistics is correct.; int3 & sent16 -> int4: the sawhorse does calculate and it recommends Karen.; int4 -> int5: the sawhorse recommends Karen.;" ]
UNKNOWN
[ "sent11 -> int1: {A}{aa}; sent4 -> int2: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa}; sent23 -> int3: ¬{F}{aa} -> ({E}{aa} & {C}{aa}); int3 & sent16 -> int4: ({E}{aa} & {C}{aa}); int4 -> int5: {C}{aa};" ]
UNKNOWN
4
null
20
0
20
that the sawhorse is feverish and recommends Karen is not right.
¬({B}{aa} & {C}{aa})
5
[ "sent17 -> int6: if that the embankment is feverish and does reposition naphthoquinone does not hold it is not feverish.;" ]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the sawhorse is feverish and it does recommend Karen is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does not recommend bandsaw it does reposition naphthoquinone and is linguistics. sent2: if the sawhorse does not suffer Kivu then it suffers superannuation and is a miscarriage. sent3: something recommends Karen and/or it does suffer balkline if it is non-feverish. sent4: something is feverish if the fact that it suffers Kivu and does not prevent is wrong. sent5: the evacuee is prejudicial if the mazer is prejudicial. sent6: the embankment is not feverish if the Capital is feverish and calculates. sent7: if something is dysplastic then it is feverish. sent8: if something repositions curbside then it is feverish. sent9: there is something such that it is a litigiousness. sent10: if that the heliozoan repositions naphthoquinone hold then that it recommends Northern and it does not shuck is not right. sent11: the sawhorse repositions naphthoquinone and does suffer balkline. sent12: the Capital does calculate if the bandsaw does reposition naphthoquinone. sent13: either something repositions curbside or it is dysplastic or both if it is not a kind of a Siberian. sent14: if there exists something such that it is a litigiousness the bandsaw does not recommend bandsaw. sent15: the hogchoker does closet. sent16: the sawhorse is not linguistics. sent17: if that something is feverish and it does reposition naphthoquinone is not correct it is not feverish. sent18: if the evacuee is prejudicial the Capital is non-Siberian and it is not a mesh. sent19: the fact that something is a hayrack and not a poliovirus is wrong if it does suffer balkline. sent20: something suffers satang if it does closet. sent21: if the embankment recommends Karen the convictfish suffers balkline. sent22: the mazer is prejudicial if the hogchoker suffers satang. sent23: that something calculates and it does recommend Karen is not false if it is not linguistics. sent24: if the embankment does suffer balkline the convictfish does suffer balkline. ; $proof$ =
__UNKNOWN__
DeductionInstance
the sawhorse repositions naphthoquinone and does suffer balkline.
[ "something is feverish if the fact that it suffers Kivu and does not prevent is wrong.", "that something calculates and it does recommend Karen is not false if it is not linguistics.", "the sawhorse is not linguistics." ]
[ "The saw horse has a problem with naphthoquinone.", "The sawhorse has a problem with naphthoquinone.", "The sawhorse has problems with naphthoquinone." ]
The sawhorse has problems with naphthoquinone.
the sawhorse is not linguistics.
the ossification is not a Saarinen.
sent1: the ossification is not ideographic but it is vicinal if the Mason is competent. sent2: that the basalt is a Saarinen but it is not a dipteran is incorrect. sent3: something does not suffer Cro-magnon if it corrodes Haida. sent4: that that the basalt is a dipteran but it is not a Saarinen is not right is true. sent5: that the open is a dipteran is true. sent6: there is something such that the fact that it is a dipteran and it is a anemometry is not correct. sent7: that the stacte is a Saarinen hold. sent8: there is something such that the fact that it is a Saarinen and is not a kind of a dipteran is not right. sent9: there exists something such that that it is a anemometry and it is not a Saarinen is wrong. sent10: something is a kind of a pseudoscience that is a kind of a chart if it does not suffer Cro-magnon. sent11: if something is a pseudoscience then it is competent. sent12: that the basalt is a dipteran but it is not a anemometry is false. sent13: there exists something such that that it is a dipteran and is not a Saarinen is not correct. sent14: there exists something such that that it is a kind of a toxicity and is not ampullar does not hold. sent15: something is a dipteran that is not a anemometry. sent16: something is not a kind of a Saarinen if it is non-ideographic and vicinal. sent17: the ossification is a Saarinen if there exists something such that the fact that it is a dipteran and not a anemometry is not true. sent18: if there is something such that it is not a dipteran then the ossification is a Saarinen.
¬{A}{a}
sent1: {D}{b} -> (¬{C}{a} & {B}{a}) sent2: ¬({A}{aa} & ¬{AA}{aa}) sent3: (x): {H}x -> ¬{G}x sent4: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{A}{aa}) sent5: {AA}{cn} sent6: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) sent7: {A}{n} sent8: (Ex): ¬({A}x & ¬{AA}x) sent9: (Ex): ¬({AB}x & ¬{A}x) sent10: (x): ¬{G}x -> ({E}x & {F}x) sent11: (x): {E}x -> {D}x sent12: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent13: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & ¬{A}x) sent14: (Ex): ¬({JE}x & ¬{JI}x) sent15: (Ex): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent16: (x): (¬{C}x & {B}x) -> ¬{A}x sent17: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {A}{a} sent18: (x): ¬{AA}x -> {A}{a}
[ "sent12 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it is a dipteran and is not a anemometry is not true.; int1 & sent17 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
[ "sent12 -> int1: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x); int1 & sent17 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
2
2
16
0
16
the ossification is not a Saarinen.
¬{A}{a}
7
[ "sent16 -> int2: if the ossification is not ideographic and not non-vicinal then that it is a kind of a Saarinen is not true.; sent11 -> int3: the Mason is competent if it is a pseudoscience.; sent10 -> int4: if that that the Mason does suffer Cro-magnon is false is right then it is a pseudoscience and it is a chart.; sent3 -> int5: if the Mason does corrode Haida then it does not suffer Cro-magnon.;" ]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the ossification is not a Saarinen. ; $context$ = sent1: the ossification is not ideographic but it is vicinal if the Mason is competent. sent2: that the basalt is a Saarinen but it is not a dipteran is incorrect. sent3: something does not suffer Cro-magnon if it corrodes Haida. sent4: that that the basalt is a dipteran but it is not a Saarinen is not right is true. sent5: that the open is a dipteran is true. sent6: there is something such that the fact that it is a dipteran and it is a anemometry is not correct. sent7: that the stacte is a Saarinen hold. sent8: there is something such that the fact that it is a Saarinen and is not a kind of a dipteran is not right. sent9: there exists something such that that it is a anemometry and it is not a Saarinen is wrong. sent10: something is a kind of a pseudoscience that is a kind of a chart if it does not suffer Cro-magnon. sent11: if something is a pseudoscience then it is competent. sent12: that the basalt is a dipteran but it is not a anemometry is false. sent13: there exists something such that that it is a dipteran and is not a Saarinen is not correct. sent14: there exists something such that that it is a kind of a toxicity and is not ampullar does not hold. sent15: something is a dipteran that is not a anemometry. sent16: something is not a kind of a Saarinen if it is non-ideographic and vicinal. sent17: the ossification is a Saarinen if there exists something such that the fact that it is a dipteran and not a anemometry is not true. sent18: if there is something such that it is not a dipteran then the ossification is a Saarinen. ; $proof$ =
sent12 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it is a dipteran and is not a anemometry is not true.; int1 & sent17 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
DeductionInstance
that the basalt is a dipteran but it is not a anemometry is false.
[ "the ossification is a Saarinen if there exists something such that the fact that it is a dipteran and not a anemometry is not true." ]
[ "that the basalt is a dipteran but it is not a anemometry is false." ]
that the basalt is a dipteran but it is not a anemometry is false.
the ossification is a Saarinen if there exists something such that the fact that it is a dipteran and not a anemometry is not true.
the nine is not a kind of a brachiopod.
sent1: if something does recommend monopolist it is a kind of a brachiopod. sent2: the nine is not a brachiopod if the fact that the cyanogen is not an illness or brachiopod or both does not hold. sent3: everything recommends monopolist. sent4: the infructescence is a kind of a brachiopod. sent5: the misleader is a kind of a brachiopod if the cyanogen is a kind of a brachiopod. sent6: everything repositions cytomembrane.
¬{B}{aa}
sent1: (x): {A}x -> {B}x sent2: ¬(¬{C}{a} v {B}{a}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent3: (x): {A}x sent4: {B}{gm} sent5: {B}{a} -> {B}{du} sent6: (x): {BU}x
[ "sent3 -> int1: the nine recommends monopolist.; sent1 -> int2: the nine is a kind of a brachiopod if it does recommend monopolist.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
[ "sent3 -> int1: {A}{aa}; sent1 -> int2: {A}{aa} -> {B}{aa}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
2
2
4
0
4
the misleader is a brachiopod.
{B}{du}
6
[]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the nine is not a kind of a brachiopod. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does recommend monopolist it is a kind of a brachiopod. sent2: the nine is not a brachiopod if the fact that the cyanogen is not an illness or brachiopod or both does not hold. sent3: everything recommends monopolist. sent4: the infructescence is a kind of a brachiopod. sent5: the misleader is a kind of a brachiopod if the cyanogen is a kind of a brachiopod. sent6: everything repositions cytomembrane. ; $proof$ =
sent3 -> int1: the nine recommends monopolist.; sent1 -> int2: the nine is a kind of a brachiopod if it does recommend monopolist.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
DeductionInstance
everything recommends monopolist.
[ "if something does recommend monopolist it is a kind of a brachiopod." ]
[ "everything recommends monopolist." ]
everything recommends monopolist.
if something does recommend monopolist it is a kind of a brachiopod.
the plastic is not a kind of a meltwater.
sent1: if there exists something such that that it is not a string and suffers rain is false the plastic is a string. sent2: the orthoepist is not a kind of a stammer if the plastic does not suffer fugitive and it is not a meltwater. sent3: the umber is a kind of a cubby if the fact that the ergot is not a hymeneal or is not a kind of a string or both is false. sent4: the umber is a wheatgrass or it is not a tiyin or both. sent5: everything is not a stammer and it does not suffer fugitive. sent6: if something is a kind of a wheatgrass and/or is not a tiyin it is brahminic. sent7: the plastic is not a meltwater if the orthoepist is not a kind of a stammer and it does not suffer fugitive. sent8: if there is something such that it is chalybeate then the umber repositions Rus and recommends ninepins. sent9: if the plunderer is not non-brahminic then the fact that the haywire is a farfalle but it does not suffer rain is not false. sent10: the fact that something is not a kind of a hymeneal or it is not a string or both is not right if it is a farfalle. sent11: if something does recommend ninepins and it is brahminic it is not a farfalle. sent12: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a count and not a platelet is incorrect then the ergot is chalybeate. sent13: something is not a hymeneal if that it is a string hold. sent14: if the fact that the plastic is a hymeneal is not correct the landgrave is a kind of a cubby but it is not a meltwater. sent15: the orthoepist does not suffer fugitive if the plastic is not a stammer but a meltwater. sent16: that that something does not string and does suffer rain hold does not hold if it is not a farfalle. sent17: everything is not inculpatory. sent18: if the haywire is a farfalle then the ergot is a farfalle. sent19: there is something such that the fact that it is not a count and it is not a platelet does not hold.
¬{A}{a}
sent1: (x): ¬(¬{D}x & {F}x) -> {D}{a} sent2: (¬{AB}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) -> ¬{AA}{aa} sent3: ¬(¬{C}{c} v ¬{D}{c}) -> {B}{b} sent4: ({N}{b} v ¬{M}{b}) sent5: (x): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent6: (x): ({N}x v ¬{M}x) -> {G}x sent7: (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{A}{a} sent8: (x): {J}x -> ({I}{b} & {H}{b}) sent9: {G}{e} -> ({E}{d} & ¬{F}{d}) sent10: (x): {E}x -> ¬(¬{C}x v ¬{D}x) sent11: (x): ({H}x & {G}x) -> ¬{E}x sent12: (x): ¬(¬{L}x & ¬{K}x) -> {J}{c} sent13: (x): {D}x -> ¬{C}x sent14: ¬{C}{a} -> ({B}{go} & ¬{A}{go}) sent15: (¬{AA}{a} & {A}{a}) -> ¬{AB}{aa} sent16: (x): ¬{E}x -> ¬(¬{D}x & {F}x) sent17: (x): ¬{HA}x sent18: {E}{d} -> {E}{c} sent19: (Ex): ¬(¬{L}x & ¬{K}x)
[ "sent5 -> int1: the orthoepist is not a stammer and it does not suffer fugitive.; sent7 & int1 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
[ "sent5 -> int1: (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}); sent7 & int1 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
2
2
17
0
17
the plastic is a kind of a meltwater.
{A}{a}
8
[ "sent10 -> int2: if the ergot is a kind of a farfalle the fact that it is not a hymeneal or it is not a string or both does not hold.;" ]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the plastic is not a kind of a meltwater. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that that it is not a string and suffers rain is false the plastic is a string. sent2: the orthoepist is not a kind of a stammer if the plastic does not suffer fugitive and it is not a meltwater. sent3: the umber is a kind of a cubby if the fact that the ergot is not a hymeneal or is not a kind of a string or both is false. sent4: the umber is a wheatgrass or it is not a tiyin or both. sent5: everything is not a stammer and it does not suffer fugitive. sent6: if something is a kind of a wheatgrass and/or is not a tiyin it is brahminic. sent7: the plastic is not a meltwater if the orthoepist is not a kind of a stammer and it does not suffer fugitive. sent8: if there is something such that it is chalybeate then the umber repositions Rus and recommends ninepins. sent9: if the plunderer is not non-brahminic then the fact that the haywire is a farfalle but it does not suffer rain is not false. sent10: the fact that something is not a kind of a hymeneal or it is not a string or both is not right if it is a farfalle. sent11: if something does recommend ninepins and it is brahminic it is not a farfalle. sent12: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a count and not a platelet is incorrect then the ergot is chalybeate. sent13: something is not a hymeneal if that it is a string hold. sent14: if the fact that the plastic is a hymeneal is not correct the landgrave is a kind of a cubby but it is not a meltwater. sent15: the orthoepist does not suffer fugitive if the plastic is not a stammer but a meltwater. sent16: that that something does not string and does suffer rain hold does not hold if it is not a farfalle. sent17: everything is not inculpatory. sent18: if the haywire is a farfalle then the ergot is a farfalle. sent19: there is something such that the fact that it is not a count and it is not a platelet does not hold. ; $proof$ =
sent5 -> int1: the orthoepist is not a stammer and it does not suffer fugitive.; sent7 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
DeductionInstance
everything is not a stammer and it does not suffer fugitive.
[ "the plastic is not a meltwater if the orthoepist is not a kind of a stammer and it does not suffer fugitive." ]
[ "everything is not a stammer and it does not suffer fugitive." ]
everything is not a stammer and it does not suffer fugitive.
the plastic is not a meltwater if the orthoepist is not a kind of a stammer and it does not suffer fugitive.
the rocambole is precocial but it does not recommend cortisone.
sent1: if something is not pneumonic then the fact that it is not a coax and is a kind of a Panthera does not hold. sent2: if the bellbird is not a milliradian the fact that the rivulet is a kind of a hydrolith that does reposition rhabdovirus is incorrect. sent3: the bellbird is a FAA and it is microcosmic. sent4: the rocambole is a coax. sent5: that something is precocial but it does not recommend cortisone is incorrect if it is a Panthera. sent6: if the rocambole is both a coax and pneumonic then it does not recommend cortisone. sent7: the rocambole is a Panthera if the fact that the wharfage is not a coax and is a Panthera is not true. sent8: if the rocambole is precocial and is a Panthera then it is not pneumonic. sent9: the wharfage is pneumonic. sent10: if the bellbird is a kind of a FAA and it is microcosmic then it is not a milliradian. sent11: the omnirange is not pneumonic. sent12: the rocambole is a coax and it is pneumonic. sent13: if the fact that the wharfage is a Panthera is not wrong the rocambole is precocial. sent14: the wharfage is a kind of a Panthera.
({B}{b} & ¬{C}{b})
sent1: (x): ¬{E}x -> ¬(¬{D}x & {A}x) sent2: ¬{G}{e} -> ¬({F}{d} & {H}{d}) sent3: ({J}{e} & {I}{e}) sent4: {D}{b} sent5: (x): {A}x -> ¬({B}x & ¬{C}x) sent6: ({D}{b} & {E}{b}) -> ¬{C}{b} sent7: ¬(¬{D}{a} & {A}{a}) -> {A}{b} sent8: ({B}{b} & {A}{b}) -> ¬{E}{b} sent9: {E}{a} sent10: ({J}{e} & {I}{e}) -> ¬{G}{e} sent11: ¬{E}{el} sent12: ({D}{b} & {E}{b}) sent13: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} sent14: {A}{a}
[ "sent13 & sent14 -> int1: the fact that the rocambole is precocial is right.; sent6 & sent12 -> int2: the fact that the rocambole does not recommend cortisone is not false.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
[ "sent13 & sent14 -> int1: {B}{b}; sent6 & sent12 -> int2: ¬{C}{b}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
2
2
10
0
10
that the rocambole is precocial thing that does not recommend cortisone does not hold.
¬({B}{b} & ¬{C}{b})
9
[ "sent5 -> int3: that the rocambole is precocial and does not recommend cortisone does not hold if it is a Panthera.; sent1 -> int4: that the wharfage is not a kind of a coax and is a kind of a Panthera is wrong if it is not pneumonic.; sent10 & sent3 -> int5: the bellbird is not a milliradian.; sent2 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the rivulet is a hydrolith and repositions rhabdovirus does not hold.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that the fact that it is a hydrolith that does reposition rhabdovirus does not hold.;" ]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the rocambole is precocial but it does not recommend cortisone. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not pneumonic then the fact that it is not a coax and is a kind of a Panthera does not hold. sent2: if the bellbird is not a milliradian the fact that the rivulet is a kind of a hydrolith that does reposition rhabdovirus is incorrect. sent3: the bellbird is a FAA and it is microcosmic. sent4: the rocambole is a coax. sent5: that something is precocial but it does not recommend cortisone is incorrect if it is a Panthera. sent6: if the rocambole is both a coax and pneumonic then it does not recommend cortisone. sent7: the rocambole is a Panthera if the fact that the wharfage is not a coax and is a Panthera is not true. sent8: if the rocambole is precocial and is a Panthera then it is not pneumonic. sent9: the wharfage is pneumonic. sent10: if the bellbird is a kind of a FAA and it is microcosmic then it is not a milliradian. sent11: the omnirange is not pneumonic. sent12: the rocambole is a coax and it is pneumonic. sent13: if the fact that the wharfage is a Panthera is not wrong the rocambole is precocial. sent14: the wharfage is a kind of a Panthera. ; $proof$ =
sent13 & sent14 -> int1: the fact that the rocambole is precocial is right.; sent6 & sent12 -> int2: the fact that the rocambole does not recommend cortisone is not false.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
DeductionInstance
if the fact that the wharfage is a Panthera is not wrong the rocambole is precocial.
[ "the wharfage is a kind of a Panthera.", "if the rocambole is both a coax and pneumonic then it does not recommend cortisone.", "the rocambole is a coax and it is pneumonic." ]
[ "If the fact that the wharfage is a Panthera is correct.", "The ro cambole is precocial if the wharfage is a Panthera.", "The rocambole is precocial if the wharfage is a Panthera." ]
If the fact that the wharfage is a Panthera is correct.
the wharfage is a kind of a Panthera.
the rocambole is precocial but it does not recommend cortisone.
sent1: if something is not pneumonic then the fact that it is not a coax and is a kind of a Panthera does not hold. sent2: if the bellbird is not a milliradian the fact that the rivulet is a kind of a hydrolith that does reposition rhabdovirus is incorrect. sent3: the bellbird is a FAA and it is microcosmic. sent4: the rocambole is a coax. sent5: that something is precocial but it does not recommend cortisone is incorrect if it is a Panthera. sent6: if the rocambole is both a coax and pneumonic then it does not recommend cortisone. sent7: the rocambole is a Panthera if the fact that the wharfage is not a coax and is a Panthera is not true. sent8: if the rocambole is precocial and is a Panthera then it is not pneumonic. sent9: the wharfage is pneumonic. sent10: if the bellbird is a kind of a FAA and it is microcosmic then it is not a milliradian. sent11: the omnirange is not pneumonic. sent12: the rocambole is a coax and it is pneumonic. sent13: if the fact that the wharfage is a Panthera is not wrong the rocambole is precocial. sent14: the wharfage is a kind of a Panthera.
({B}{b} & ¬{C}{b})
sent1: (x): ¬{E}x -> ¬(¬{D}x & {A}x) sent2: ¬{G}{e} -> ¬({F}{d} & {H}{d}) sent3: ({J}{e} & {I}{e}) sent4: {D}{b} sent5: (x): {A}x -> ¬({B}x & ¬{C}x) sent6: ({D}{b} & {E}{b}) -> ¬{C}{b} sent7: ¬(¬{D}{a} & {A}{a}) -> {A}{b} sent8: ({B}{b} & {A}{b}) -> ¬{E}{b} sent9: {E}{a} sent10: ({J}{e} & {I}{e}) -> ¬{G}{e} sent11: ¬{E}{el} sent12: ({D}{b} & {E}{b}) sent13: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} sent14: {A}{a}
[ "sent13 & sent14 -> int1: the fact that the rocambole is precocial is right.; sent6 & sent12 -> int2: the fact that the rocambole does not recommend cortisone is not false.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
[ "sent13 & sent14 -> int1: {B}{b}; sent6 & sent12 -> int2: ¬{C}{b}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
2
2
10
0
10
that the rocambole is precocial thing that does not recommend cortisone does not hold.
¬({B}{b} & ¬{C}{b})
9
[ "sent5 -> int3: that the rocambole is precocial and does not recommend cortisone does not hold if it is a Panthera.; sent1 -> int4: that the wharfage is not a kind of a coax and is a kind of a Panthera is wrong if it is not pneumonic.; sent10 & sent3 -> int5: the bellbird is not a milliradian.; sent2 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the rivulet is a hydrolith and repositions rhabdovirus does not hold.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that the fact that it is a hydrolith that does reposition rhabdovirus does not hold.;" ]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the rocambole is precocial but it does not recommend cortisone. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not pneumonic then the fact that it is not a coax and is a kind of a Panthera does not hold. sent2: if the bellbird is not a milliradian the fact that the rivulet is a kind of a hydrolith that does reposition rhabdovirus is incorrect. sent3: the bellbird is a FAA and it is microcosmic. sent4: the rocambole is a coax. sent5: that something is precocial but it does not recommend cortisone is incorrect if it is a Panthera. sent6: if the rocambole is both a coax and pneumonic then it does not recommend cortisone. sent7: the rocambole is a Panthera if the fact that the wharfage is not a coax and is a Panthera is not true. sent8: if the rocambole is precocial and is a Panthera then it is not pneumonic. sent9: the wharfage is pneumonic. sent10: if the bellbird is a kind of a FAA and it is microcosmic then it is not a milliradian. sent11: the omnirange is not pneumonic. sent12: the rocambole is a coax and it is pneumonic. sent13: if the fact that the wharfage is a Panthera is not wrong the rocambole is precocial. sent14: the wharfage is a kind of a Panthera. ; $proof$ =
sent13 & sent14 -> int1: the fact that the rocambole is precocial is right.; sent6 & sent12 -> int2: the fact that the rocambole does not recommend cortisone is not false.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
DeductionInstance
if the fact that the wharfage is a Panthera is not wrong the rocambole is precocial.
[ "the wharfage is a kind of a Panthera.", "if the rocambole is both a coax and pneumonic then it does not recommend cortisone.", "the rocambole is a coax and it is pneumonic." ]
[ "If the fact that the wharfage is a Panthera is correct.", "The ro cambole is precocial if the wharfage is a Panthera.", "The rocambole is precocial if the wharfage is a Panthera." ]
The ro cambole is precocial if the wharfage is a Panthera.
if the rocambole is both a coax and pneumonic then it does not recommend cortisone.
the rocambole is precocial but it does not recommend cortisone.
sent1: if something is not pneumonic then the fact that it is not a coax and is a kind of a Panthera does not hold. sent2: if the bellbird is not a milliradian the fact that the rivulet is a kind of a hydrolith that does reposition rhabdovirus is incorrect. sent3: the bellbird is a FAA and it is microcosmic. sent4: the rocambole is a coax. sent5: that something is precocial but it does not recommend cortisone is incorrect if it is a Panthera. sent6: if the rocambole is both a coax and pneumonic then it does not recommend cortisone. sent7: the rocambole is a Panthera if the fact that the wharfage is not a coax and is a Panthera is not true. sent8: if the rocambole is precocial and is a Panthera then it is not pneumonic. sent9: the wharfage is pneumonic. sent10: if the bellbird is a kind of a FAA and it is microcosmic then it is not a milliradian. sent11: the omnirange is not pneumonic. sent12: the rocambole is a coax and it is pneumonic. sent13: if the fact that the wharfage is a Panthera is not wrong the rocambole is precocial. sent14: the wharfage is a kind of a Panthera.
({B}{b} & ¬{C}{b})
sent1: (x): ¬{E}x -> ¬(¬{D}x & {A}x) sent2: ¬{G}{e} -> ¬({F}{d} & {H}{d}) sent3: ({J}{e} & {I}{e}) sent4: {D}{b} sent5: (x): {A}x -> ¬({B}x & ¬{C}x) sent6: ({D}{b} & {E}{b}) -> ¬{C}{b} sent7: ¬(¬{D}{a} & {A}{a}) -> {A}{b} sent8: ({B}{b} & {A}{b}) -> ¬{E}{b} sent9: {E}{a} sent10: ({J}{e} & {I}{e}) -> ¬{G}{e} sent11: ¬{E}{el} sent12: ({D}{b} & {E}{b}) sent13: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} sent14: {A}{a}
[ "sent13 & sent14 -> int1: the fact that the rocambole is precocial is right.; sent6 & sent12 -> int2: the fact that the rocambole does not recommend cortisone is not false.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
[ "sent13 & sent14 -> int1: {B}{b}; sent6 & sent12 -> int2: ¬{C}{b}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
2
2
10
0
10
that the rocambole is precocial thing that does not recommend cortisone does not hold.
¬({B}{b} & ¬{C}{b})
9
[ "sent5 -> int3: that the rocambole is precocial and does not recommend cortisone does not hold if it is a Panthera.; sent1 -> int4: that the wharfage is not a kind of a coax and is a kind of a Panthera is wrong if it is not pneumonic.; sent10 & sent3 -> int5: the bellbird is not a milliradian.; sent2 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the rivulet is a hydrolith and repositions rhabdovirus does not hold.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that the fact that it is a hydrolith that does reposition rhabdovirus does not hold.;" ]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the rocambole is precocial but it does not recommend cortisone. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not pneumonic then the fact that it is not a coax and is a kind of a Panthera does not hold. sent2: if the bellbird is not a milliradian the fact that the rivulet is a kind of a hydrolith that does reposition rhabdovirus is incorrect. sent3: the bellbird is a FAA and it is microcosmic. sent4: the rocambole is a coax. sent5: that something is precocial but it does not recommend cortisone is incorrect if it is a Panthera. sent6: if the rocambole is both a coax and pneumonic then it does not recommend cortisone. sent7: the rocambole is a Panthera if the fact that the wharfage is not a coax and is a Panthera is not true. sent8: if the rocambole is precocial and is a Panthera then it is not pneumonic. sent9: the wharfage is pneumonic. sent10: if the bellbird is a kind of a FAA and it is microcosmic then it is not a milliradian. sent11: the omnirange is not pneumonic. sent12: the rocambole is a coax and it is pneumonic. sent13: if the fact that the wharfage is a Panthera is not wrong the rocambole is precocial. sent14: the wharfage is a kind of a Panthera. ; $proof$ =
sent13 & sent14 -> int1: the fact that the rocambole is precocial is right.; sent6 & sent12 -> int2: the fact that the rocambole does not recommend cortisone is not false.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
DeductionInstance
if the fact that the wharfage is a Panthera is not wrong the rocambole is precocial.
[ "the wharfage is a kind of a Panthera.", "if the rocambole is both a coax and pneumonic then it does not recommend cortisone.", "the rocambole is a coax and it is pneumonic." ]
[ "If the fact that the wharfage is a Panthera is correct.", "The ro cambole is precocial if the wharfage is a Panthera.", "The rocambole is precocial if the wharfage is a Panthera." ]
The rocambole is precocial if the wharfage is a Panthera.
the rocambole is a coax and it is pneumonic.
the triskelion is an absolute.
sent1: if something is not a kind of a dactyl and does not checker then it does not reposition dynamism. sent2: if the fact that the piperacillin is anti-semitic but it is not a captivity does not hold then the fomentation is not anti-semitic. sent3: the fact that the triskelion is not a kind of a humectant is not incorrect. sent4: if something does not reposition dynamism then it is an absolute. sent5: if the triskelion is not a kind of a humectant it is not a kind of a dactyl and it is not a kind of a checkers. sent6: the fact that the piperacillin is anti-semitic but it is not a captivity is wrong. sent7: if the fomentation is non-anti-semitic then the fact that the bushman is both a quiver and a Newfoundland is wrong. sent8: if the recognition is a kind of non-absolute thing that does not hiccup then it is not a kind of a panther.
{A}{aa}
sent1: (x): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent2: ¬({F}{d} & ¬{G}{d}) -> ¬{F}{c} sent3: ¬{C}{aa} sent4: (x): ¬{B}x -> {A}x sent5: ¬{C}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent6: ¬({F}{d} & ¬{G}{d}) sent7: ¬{F}{c} -> ¬({D}{b} & {E}{b}) sent8: (¬{A}{jj} & ¬{FS}{jj}) -> ¬{EM}{jj}
[ "sent1 -> int1: the triskelion does not reposition dynamism if it is not a dactyl and it is not a checkers.; sent5 & sent3 -> int2: the triskelion is not a dactyl and it is not a checkers.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the triskelion does not reposition dynamism.; sent4 -> int4: the triskelion is an absolute if the fact that it does not reposition dynamism is not incorrect.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
[ "sent1 -> int1: (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa}; sent5 & sent3 -> int2: (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}); int1 & int2 -> int3: ¬{B}{aa}; sent4 -> int4: ¬{B}{aa} -> {A}{aa}; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
3
3
4
0
4
the triskelion is non-absolute.
¬{A}{aa}
7
[ "sent2 & sent6 -> int5: the fomentation is not anti-semitic.; sent7 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the bushman is a quiver and is a Newfoundland is not right.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a quiver that is a kind of a Newfoundland is false.;" ]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the triskelion is an absolute. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a kind of a dactyl and does not checker then it does not reposition dynamism. sent2: if the fact that the piperacillin is anti-semitic but it is not a captivity does not hold then the fomentation is not anti-semitic. sent3: the fact that the triskelion is not a kind of a humectant is not incorrect. sent4: if something does not reposition dynamism then it is an absolute. sent5: if the triskelion is not a kind of a humectant it is not a kind of a dactyl and it is not a kind of a checkers. sent6: the fact that the piperacillin is anti-semitic but it is not a captivity is wrong. sent7: if the fomentation is non-anti-semitic then the fact that the bushman is both a quiver and a Newfoundland is wrong. sent8: if the recognition is a kind of non-absolute thing that does not hiccup then it is not a kind of a panther. ; $proof$ =
sent1 -> int1: the triskelion does not reposition dynamism if it is not a dactyl and it is not a checkers.; sent5 & sent3 -> int2: the triskelion is not a dactyl and it is not a checkers.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the triskelion does not reposition dynamism.; sent4 -> int4: the triskelion is an absolute if the fact that it does not reposition dynamism is not incorrect.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
DeductionInstance
if something is not a kind of a dactyl and does not checker then it does not reposition dynamism.
[ "if the triskelion is not a kind of a humectant it is not a kind of a dactyl and it is not a kind of a checkers.", "the fact that the triskelion is not a kind of a humectant is not incorrect.", "if something does not reposition dynamism then it is an absolute." ]
[ "It doesn't make sense that something is not a dactyl if it doesn't checker.", "If something isn't a dactyl and doesn't checker then it doesn't move dynamism.", "It doesn't make sense that something is not a dactyl if it doesn't checkers." ]
It doesn't make sense that something is not a dactyl if it doesn't checker.
if the triskelion is not a kind of a humectant it is not a kind of a dactyl and it is not a kind of a checkers.
the triskelion is an absolute.
sent1: if something is not a kind of a dactyl and does not checker then it does not reposition dynamism. sent2: if the fact that the piperacillin is anti-semitic but it is not a captivity does not hold then the fomentation is not anti-semitic. sent3: the fact that the triskelion is not a kind of a humectant is not incorrect. sent4: if something does not reposition dynamism then it is an absolute. sent5: if the triskelion is not a kind of a humectant it is not a kind of a dactyl and it is not a kind of a checkers. sent6: the fact that the piperacillin is anti-semitic but it is not a captivity is wrong. sent7: if the fomentation is non-anti-semitic then the fact that the bushman is both a quiver and a Newfoundland is wrong. sent8: if the recognition is a kind of non-absolute thing that does not hiccup then it is not a kind of a panther.
{A}{aa}
sent1: (x): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent2: ¬({F}{d} & ¬{G}{d}) -> ¬{F}{c} sent3: ¬{C}{aa} sent4: (x): ¬{B}x -> {A}x sent5: ¬{C}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent6: ¬({F}{d} & ¬{G}{d}) sent7: ¬{F}{c} -> ¬({D}{b} & {E}{b}) sent8: (¬{A}{jj} & ¬{FS}{jj}) -> ¬{EM}{jj}
[ "sent1 -> int1: the triskelion does not reposition dynamism if it is not a dactyl and it is not a checkers.; sent5 & sent3 -> int2: the triskelion is not a dactyl and it is not a checkers.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the triskelion does not reposition dynamism.; sent4 -> int4: the triskelion is an absolute if the fact that it does not reposition dynamism is not incorrect.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
[ "sent1 -> int1: (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa}; sent5 & sent3 -> int2: (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}); int1 & int2 -> int3: ¬{B}{aa}; sent4 -> int4: ¬{B}{aa} -> {A}{aa}; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
3
3
4
0
4
the triskelion is non-absolute.
¬{A}{aa}
7
[ "sent2 & sent6 -> int5: the fomentation is not anti-semitic.; sent7 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the bushman is a quiver and is a Newfoundland is not right.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a quiver that is a kind of a Newfoundland is false.;" ]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the triskelion is an absolute. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a kind of a dactyl and does not checker then it does not reposition dynamism. sent2: if the fact that the piperacillin is anti-semitic but it is not a captivity does not hold then the fomentation is not anti-semitic. sent3: the fact that the triskelion is not a kind of a humectant is not incorrect. sent4: if something does not reposition dynamism then it is an absolute. sent5: if the triskelion is not a kind of a humectant it is not a kind of a dactyl and it is not a kind of a checkers. sent6: the fact that the piperacillin is anti-semitic but it is not a captivity is wrong. sent7: if the fomentation is non-anti-semitic then the fact that the bushman is both a quiver and a Newfoundland is wrong. sent8: if the recognition is a kind of non-absolute thing that does not hiccup then it is not a kind of a panther. ; $proof$ =
sent1 -> int1: the triskelion does not reposition dynamism if it is not a dactyl and it is not a checkers.; sent5 & sent3 -> int2: the triskelion is not a dactyl and it is not a checkers.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the triskelion does not reposition dynamism.; sent4 -> int4: the triskelion is an absolute if the fact that it does not reposition dynamism is not incorrect.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
DeductionInstance
if something is not a kind of a dactyl and does not checker then it does not reposition dynamism.
[ "if the triskelion is not a kind of a humectant it is not a kind of a dactyl and it is not a kind of a checkers.", "the fact that the triskelion is not a kind of a humectant is not incorrect.", "if something does not reposition dynamism then it is an absolute." ]
[ "It doesn't make sense that something is not a dactyl if it doesn't checker.", "If something isn't a dactyl and doesn't checker then it doesn't move dynamism.", "It doesn't make sense that something is not a dactyl if it doesn't checkers." ]
If something isn't a dactyl and doesn't checker then it doesn't move dynamism.
the fact that the triskelion is not a kind of a humectant is not incorrect.
the triskelion is an absolute.
sent1: if something is not a kind of a dactyl and does not checker then it does not reposition dynamism. sent2: if the fact that the piperacillin is anti-semitic but it is not a captivity does not hold then the fomentation is not anti-semitic. sent3: the fact that the triskelion is not a kind of a humectant is not incorrect. sent4: if something does not reposition dynamism then it is an absolute. sent5: if the triskelion is not a kind of a humectant it is not a kind of a dactyl and it is not a kind of a checkers. sent6: the fact that the piperacillin is anti-semitic but it is not a captivity is wrong. sent7: if the fomentation is non-anti-semitic then the fact that the bushman is both a quiver and a Newfoundland is wrong. sent8: if the recognition is a kind of non-absolute thing that does not hiccup then it is not a kind of a panther.
{A}{aa}
sent1: (x): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent2: ¬({F}{d} & ¬{G}{d}) -> ¬{F}{c} sent3: ¬{C}{aa} sent4: (x): ¬{B}x -> {A}x sent5: ¬{C}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent6: ¬({F}{d} & ¬{G}{d}) sent7: ¬{F}{c} -> ¬({D}{b} & {E}{b}) sent8: (¬{A}{jj} & ¬{FS}{jj}) -> ¬{EM}{jj}
[ "sent1 -> int1: the triskelion does not reposition dynamism if it is not a dactyl and it is not a checkers.; sent5 & sent3 -> int2: the triskelion is not a dactyl and it is not a checkers.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the triskelion does not reposition dynamism.; sent4 -> int4: the triskelion is an absolute if the fact that it does not reposition dynamism is not incorrect.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
[ "sent1 -> int1: (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa}; sent5 & sent3 -> int2: (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}); int1 & int2 -> int3: ¬{B}{aa}; sent4 -> int4: ¬{B}{aa} -> {A}{aa}; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
3
3
4
0
4
the triskelion is non-absolute.
¬{A}{aa}
7
[ "sent2 & sent6 -> int5: the fomentation is not anti-semitic.; sent7 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the bushman is a quiver and is a Newfoundland is not right.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a quiver that is a kind of a Newfoundland is false.;" ]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the triskelion is an absolute. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a kind of a dactyl and does not checker then it does not reposition dynamism. sent2: if the fact that the piperacillin is anti-semitic but it is not a captivity does not hold then the fomentation is not anti-semitic. sent3: the fact that the triskelion is not a kind of a humectant is not incorrect. sent4: if something does not reposition dynamism then it is an absolute. sent5: if the triskelion is not a kind of a humectant it is not a kind of a dactyl and it is not a kind of a checkers. sent6: the fact that the piperacillin is anti-semitic but it is not a captivity is wrong. sent7: if the fomentation is non-anti-semitic then the fact that the bushman is both a quiver and a Newfoundland is wrong. sent8: if the recognition is a kind of non-absolute thing that does not hiccup then it is not a kind of a panther. ; $proof$ =
sent1 -> int1: the triskelion does not reposition dynamism if it is not a dactyl and it is not a checkers.; sent5 & sent3 -> int2: the triskelion is not a dactyl and it is not a checkers.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the triskelion does not reposition dynamism.; sent4 -> int4: the triskelion is an absolute if the fact that it does not reposition dynamism is not incorrect.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
DeductionInstance
if something is not a kind of a dactyl and does not checker then it does not reposition dynamism.
[ "if the triskelion is not a kind of a humectant it is not a kind of a dactyl and it is not a kind of a checkers.", "the fact that the triskelion is not a kind of a humectant is not incorrect.", "if something does not reposition dynamism then it is an absolute." ]
[ "It doesn't make sense that something is not a dactyl if it doesn't checker.", "If something isn't a dactyl and doesn't checker then it doesn't move dynamism.", "It doesn't make sense that something is not a dactyl if it doesn't checkers." ]
It doesn't make sense that something is not a dactyl if it doesn't checkers.
if something does not reposition dynamism then it is an absolute.
the gunlock is epithelial.
sent1: something is epithelial if it is a coreference. sent2: the palatinate is anaphasic. sent3: the gunlock is anaphasic. sent4: the gunlock is a coreference if the fact that it is audiometric hold. sent5: the scabicide is anaphasic. sent6: something is univalent if it does color. sent7: the fact that if the fact that the gunlock is a kind of non-epithelial thing that is not non-sharp does not hold the hematochrome is not non-epithelial is right. sent8: something is anaphasic if it is a coreference. sent9: the gooseberry is a coreference. sent10: the gunlock is unpardonable. sent11: the cognate is anaphasic. sent12: that the load is epithelial hold if the fact that it is a kind of a mono-iodotyrosine is not wrong. sent13: the gunlock is marital. sent14: the thunderhead is anaphasic. sent15: the fact that the gunlock is anaphasic is true if it is cryogenic. sent16: the gunlock is a Graham. sent17: something is a kind of a calla if it is electrocardiographic. sent18: if the gunlock is anaphasic then it is a coreference. sent19: if the fact that the spicebush is static is true then it repositions scabicide. sent20: the snuff is a hypogonadism if the fact that it is not non-epithelial is not false.
{C}{a}
sent1: (x): {B}x -> {C}x sent2: {A}{bq} sent3: {A}{a} sent4: {JH}{a} -> {B}{a} sent5: {A}{du} sent6: (x): {GA}x -> {H}x sent7: ¬(¬{C}{a} & {E}{a}) -> ¬{C}{iq} sent8: (x): {B}x -> {A}x sent9: {B}{ii} sent10: {FB}{a} sent11: {A}{fk} sent12: {AJ}{ae} -> {C}{ae} sent13: {HP}{a} sent14: {A}{jg} sent15: {G}{a} -> {A}{a} sent16: {EU}{a} sent17: (x): {BS}x -> {HK}x sent18: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} sent19: {EJ}{ge} -> {AK}{ge} sent20: {C}{hj} -> {FA}{hj}
[ "sent18 & sent3 -> int1: that the gunlock is a coreference is right.; sent1 -> int2: the gunlock is epithelial if it is a coreference.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
[ "sent18 & sent3 -> int1: {B}{a}; sent1 -> int2: {B}{a} -> {C}{a}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
2
2
17
0
17
the hematochrome is anaphasic.
{A}{iq}
5
[]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the gunlock is epithelial. ; $context$ = sent1: something is epithelial if it is a coreference. sent2: the palatinate is anaphasic. sent3: the gunlock is anaphasic. sent4: the gunlock is a coreference if the fact that it is audiometric hold. sent5: the scabicide is anaphasic. sent6: something is univalent if it does color. sent7: the fact that if the fact that the gunlock is a kind of non-epithelial thing that is not non-sharp does not hold the hematochrome is not non-epithelial is right. sent8: something is anaphasic if it is a coreference. sent9: the gooseberry is a coreference. sent10: the gunlock is unpardonable. sent11: the cognate is anaphasic. sent12: that the load is epithelial hold if the fact that it is a kind of a mono-iodotyrosine is not wrong. sent13: the gunlock is marital. sent14: the thunderhead is anaphasic. sent15: the fact that the gunlock is anaphasic is true if it is cryogenic. sent16: the gunlock is a Graham. sent17: something is a kind of a calla if it is electrocardiographic. sent18: if the gunlock is anaphasic then it is a coreference. sent19: if the fact that the spicebush is static is true then it repositions scabicide. sent20: the snuff is a hypogonadism if the fact that it is not non-epithelial is not false. ; $proof$ =
sent18 & sent3 -> int1: that the gunlock is a coreference is right.; sent1 -> int2: the gunlock is epithelial if it is a coreference.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
DeductionInstance
if the gunlock is anaphasic then it is a coreference.
[ "the gunlock is anaphasic.", "something is epithelial if it is a coreference." ]
[ "If the gunlock is anaphasic then it is a reference.", "It is a coreference if the gunlock is anaphasic." ]
If the gunlock is anaphasic then it is a reference.
the gunlock is anaphasic.
the gunlock is epithelial.
sent1: something is epithelial if it is a coreference. sent2: the palatinate is anaphasic. sent3: the gunlock is anaphasic. sent4: the gunlock is a coreference if the fact that it is audiometric hold. sent5: the scabicide is anaphasic. sent6: something is univalent if it does color. sent7: the fact that if the fact that the gunlock is a kind of non-epithelial thing that is not non-sharp does not hold the hematochrome is not non-epithelial is right. sent8: something is anaphasic if it is a coreference. sent9: the gooseberry is a coreference. sent10: the gunlock is unpardonable. sent11: the cognate is anaphasic. sent12: that the load is epithelial hold if the fact that it is a kind of a mono-iodotyrosine is not wrong. sent13: the gunlock is marital. sent14: the thunderhead is anaphasic. sent15: the fact that the gunlock is anaphasic is true if it is cryogenic. sent16: the gunlock is a Graham. sent17: something is a kind of a calla if it is electrocardiographic. sent18: if the gunlock is anaphasic then it is a coreference. sent19: if the fact that the spicebush is static is true then it repositions scabicide. sent20: the snuff is a hypogonadism if the fact that it is not non-epithelial is not false.
{C}{a}
sent1: (x): {B}x -> {C}x sent2: {A}{bq} sent3: {A}{a} sent4: {JH}{a} -> {B}{a} sent5: {A}{du} sent6: (x): {GA}x -> {H}x sent7: ¬(¬{C}{a} & {E}{a}) -> ¬{C}{iq} sent8: (x): {B}x -> {A}x sent9: {B}{ii} sent10: {FB}{a} sent11: {A}{fk} sent12: {AJ}{ae} -> {C}{ae} sent13: {HP}{a} sent14: {A}{jg} sent15: {G}{a} -> {A}{a} sent16: {EU}{a} sent17: (x): {BS}x -> {HK}x sent18: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} sent19: {EJ}{ge} -> {AK}{ge} sent20: {C}{hj} -> {FA}{hj}
[ "sent18 & sent3 -> int1: that the gunlock is a coreference is right.; sent1 -> int2: the gunlock is epithelial if it is a coreference.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
[ "sent18 & sent3 -> int1: {B}{a}; sent1 -> int2: {B}{a} -> {C}{a}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
2
2
17
0
17
the hematochrome is anaphasic.
{A}{iq}
5
[]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the gunlock is epithelial. ; $context$ = sent1: something is epithelial if it is a coreference. sent2: the palatinate is anaphasic. sent3: the gunlock is anaphasic. sent4: the gunlock is a coreference if the fact that it is audiometric hold. sent5: the scabicide is anaphasic. sent6: something is univalent if it does color. sent7: the fact that if the fact that the gunlock is a kind of non-epithelial thing that is not non-sharp does not hold the hematochrome is not non-epithelial is right. sent8: something is anaphasic if it is a coreference. sent9: the gooseberry is a coreference. sent10: the gunlock is unpardonable. sent11: the cognate is anaphasic. sent12: that the load is epithelial hold if the fact that it is a kind of a mono-iodotyrosine is not wrong. sent13: the gunlock is marital. sent14: the thunderhead is anaphasic. sent15: the fact that the gunlock is anaphasic is true if it is cryogenic. sent16: the gunlock is a Graham. sent17: something is a kind of a calla if it is electrocardiographic. sent18: if the gunlock is anaphasic then it is a coreference. sent19: if the fact that the spicebush is static is true then it repositions scabicide. sent20: the snuff is a hypogonadism if the fact that it is not non-epithelial is not false. ; $proof$ =
sent18 & sent3 -> int1: that the gunlock is a coreference is right.; sent1 -> int2: the gunlock is epithelial if it is a coreference.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
DeductionInstance
if the gunlock is anaphasic then it is a coreference.
[ "the gunlock is anaphasic.", "something is epithelial if it is a coreference." ]
[ "If the gunlock is anaphasic then it is a reference.", "It is a coreference if the gunlock is anaphasic." ]
It is a coreference if the gunlock is anaphasic.
something is epithelial if it is a coreference.
the suffering Colchicum happens.
sent1: the rattle does not occur and the binocularsness does not occur if the high-techness does not occur. sent2: the fact that the firestorm occurs is right. sent3: the fact that the Italicness occurs is not incorrect. sent4: the lockdown does not occur and the inscriptiveness does not occur if the rattling does not occur. sent5: that the lockdown occurs is correct if the Slovenian happens. sent6: the astigmaticness does not occur. sent7: the suffering Colchicum does not occur if the fact that both the suffering Colchicum and the non-astigmaticness occurs does not hold. sent8: if the lockdown does not occur that the suffering Colchicum and the non-astigmaticness occurs is not true. sent9: the low-techness is prevented by that both the woodiness and the centigradeness happens. sent10: the fact that the pardonableness does not occur and/or the lockup does not occur does not hold if the low-techness does not occur. sent11: that the correlating occurs and the shading happens is brought about by that the anestheticness does not occur. sent12: the lockdown occurs if the fact that the Slovenianness does not occur and the repositioning sprawling happens is wrong. sent13: if the perorating happens the aestheticness happens or the high-techness does not occur or both. sent14: the anestheticness does not occur. sent15: the perorating happens if the corroding utmost does not occur. sent16: the woodiness is brought about by that the correlating happens. sent17: the suffering Colchicum happens if the lockdown occurs. sent18: the high-techness does not occur if the aesthetic and/or the non-high-techness happens. sent19: if the fact that the pardonableness does not occur and/or the lockup does not occur does not hold then the corroding utmost does not occur.
{C}
sent1: ¬{G} -> (¬{E} & ¬{F}) sent2: {BO} sent3: {EI} sent4: ¬{E} -> (¬{B} & ¬{D}) sent5: {AA} -> {B} sent6: ¬{A} sent7: ¬({C} & ¬{A}) -> ¬{C} sent8: ¬{B} -> ¬({C} & ¬{A}) sent9: ({N} & {O}) -> ¬{M} sent10: ¬{M} -> ¬(¬{L} v ¬{K}) sent11: ¬{T} -> ({P} & {R}) sent12: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) -> {B} sent13: {I} -> ({H} v ¬{G}) sent14: ¬{T} sent15: ¬{J} -> {I} sent16: {P} -> {N} sent17: {B} -> {C} sent18: ({H} v ¬{G}) -> ¬{G} sent19: ¬(¬{L} v ¬{K}) -> ¬{J}
[]
UNKNOWN
[]
UNKNOWN
3
null
16
0
16
the suffering Colchicum does not occur.
¬{C}
16
[ "sent11 & sent14 -> int1: the correlate and the shade happens.; int1 -> int2: the correlating happens.; sent16 & int2 -> int3: the woodiness occurs.;" ]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the suffering Colchicum happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the rattle does not occur and the binocularsness does not occur if the high-techness does not occur. sent2: the fact that the firestorm occurs is right. sent3: the fact that the Italicness occurs is not incorrect. sent4: the lockdown does not occur and the inscriptiveness does not occur if the rattling does not occur. sent5: that the lockdown occurs is correct if the Slovenian happens. sent6: the astigmaticness does not occur. sent7: the suffering Colchicum does not occur if the fact that both the suffering Colchicum and the non-astigmaticness occurs does not hold. sent8: if the lockdown does not occur that the suffering Colchicum and the non-astigmaticness occurs is not true. sent9: the low-techness is prevented by that both the woodiness and the centigradeness happens. sent10: the fact that the pardonableness does not occur and/or the lockup does not occur does not hold if the low-techness does not occur. sent11: that the correlating occurs and the shading happens is brought about by that the anestheticness does not occur. sent12: the lockdown occurs if the fact that the Slovenianness does not occur and the repositioning sprawling happens is wrong. sent13: if the perorating happens the aestheticness happens or the high-techness does not occur or both. sent14: the anestheticness does not occur. sent15: the perorating happens if the corroding utmost does not occur. sent16: the woodiness is brought about by that the correlating happens. sent17: the suffering Colchicum happens if the lockdown occurs. sent18: the high-techness does not occur if the aesthetic and/or the non-high-techness happens. sent19: if the fact that the pardonableness does not occur and/or the lockup does not occur does not hold then the corroding utmost does not occur. ; $proof$ =
__UNKNOWN__
DeductionInstance
the low-techness is prevented by that both the woodiness and the centigradeness happens.
[ "the lockdown occurs if the fact that the Slovenianness does not occur and the repositioning sprawling happens is wrong." ]
[ "the low-techness is prevented by that both the woodiness and the centigradeness happens." ]
the low-techness is prevented by that both the woodiness and the centigradeness happens.
the lockdown occurs if the fact that the Slovenianness does not occur and the repositioning sprawling happens is wrong.
the non-entozoicness and the non-prewarness happens.
sent1: the forgettableness happens and the pyrotechnicsness occurs if the melting does not occur. sent2: if the forgettableness does not occur then that the fact that the entozoicness does not occur and the prewarness does not occur is false is correct. sent3: the entozoicness occurs and the antipyretic occurs if the anticancerness does not occur. sent4: if the plotting does not occur then the fact that the antiapartheidness does not occur and the manacling does not occur is not true. sent5: if the fact that the antipyreticness does not occur is true that the plotting occurs and the manacling does not occur is not correct. sent6: the fact that the suffering facade does not occur is not wrong. sent7: the fact that both the plot and the manacling happens is not right if the antipyreticness does not occur. sent8: the fact that the prewarness does not occur is true if both the forgettableness and the melting happens. sent9: the plot does not occur if the fact that the Kenyanness does not occur and/or the recommending dressed does not occur is not true. sent10: that the welding but not the carpetbag occurs is false if the proteolyticness does not occur. sent11: if the fact that the antiapartheidness does not occur and the manacling does not occur does not hold then the antiapartheidness happens. sent12: the forgettableness happens. sent13: the forgettableness does not occur if the fact that either the manacling happens or the melting occurs or both does not hold. sent14: the posting happens. sent15: the non-entozoicness is caused by that the manacling occurs. sent16: the fact that the recommending Clinidae does not occur is correct. sent17: the fact that the plot and the manacling occurs is wrong. sent18: the melting happens. sent19: if that the plotting occurs and the manacling does not occur is not correct the entozoicness does not occur.
(¬{D} & ¬{C})
sent1: ¬{B} -> ({A} & {DT}) sent2: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{D} & ¬{C}) sent3: ¬{J} -> ({D} & {G}) sent4: ¬{F} -> ¬(¬{GE} & ¬{E}) sent5: ¬{G} -> ¬({F} & ¬{E}) sent6: ¬{JI} sent7: ¬{G} -> ¬({F} & {E}) sent8: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} sent9: ¬(¬{H} v ¬{I}) -> ¬{F} sent10: ¬{AD} -> ¬({ED} & ¬{CG}) sent11: ¬(¬{GE} & ¬{E}) -> {GE} sent12: {A} sent13: ¬({E} v {B}) -> ¬{A} sent14: {JC} sent15: {E} -> ¬{D} sent16: ¬{HJ} sent17: ¬({F} & {E}) sent18: {B} sent19: ¬({F} & ¬{E}) -> ¬{D}
[ "sent12 & sent18 -> int1: the forgettableness occurs and the melting occurs.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the prewarness does not occur.;" ]
UNKNOWN
[ "sent12 & sent18 -> int1: ({A} & {B}); int1 & sent8 -> int2: ¬{C};" ]
UNKNOWN
3
null
14
0
14
both the pyrotechnicsness and the antiapartheidness occurs.
({DT} & {GE})
7
[]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the non-entozoicness and the non-prewarness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the forgettableness happens and the pyrotechnicsness occurs if the melting does not occur. sent2: if the forgettableness does not occur then that the fact that the entozoicness does not occur and the prewarness does not occur is false is correct. sent3: the entozoicness occurs and the antipyretic occurs if the anticancerness does not occur. sent4: if the plotting does not occur then the fact that the antiapartheidness does not occur and the manacling does not occur is not true. sent5: if the fact that the antipyreticness does not occur is true that the plotting occurs and the manacling does not occur is not correct. sent6: the fact that the suffering facade does not occur is not wrong. sent7: the fact that both the plot and the manacling happens is not right if the antipyreticness does not occur. sent8: the fact that the prewarness does not occur is true if both the forgettableness and the melting happens. sent9: the plot does not occur if the fact that the Kenyanness does not occur and/or the recommending dressed does not occur is not true. sent10: that the welding but not the carpetbag occurs is false if the proteolyticness does not occur. sent11: if the fact that the antiapartheidness does not occur and the manacling does not occur does not hold then the antiapartheidness happens. sent12: the forgettableness happens. sent13: the forgettableness does not occur if the fact that either the manacling happens or the melting occurs or both does not hold. sent14: the posting happens. sent15: the non-entozoicness is caused by that the manacling occurs. sent16: the fact that the recommending Clinidae does not occur is correct. sent17: the fact that the plot and the manacling occurs is wrong. sent18: the melting happens. sent19: if that the plotting occurs and the manacling does not occur is not correct the entozoicness does not occur. ; $proof$ =
__UNKNOWN__
DeductionInstance
the forgettableness happens.
[ "the melting happens.", "the fact that the prewarness does not occur is true if both the forgettableness and the melting happens." ]
[ "It happens.", "The boringness happens." ]
It happens.
the melting happens.
the non-entozoicness and the non-prewarness happens.
sent1: the forgettableness happens and the pyrotechnicsness occurs if the melting does not occur. sent2: if the forgettableness does not occur then that the fact that the entozoicness does not occur and the prewarness does not occur is false is correct. sent3: the entozoicness occurs and the antipyretic occurs if the anticancerness does not occur. sent4: if the plotting does not occur then the fact that the antiapartheidness does not occur and the manacling does not occur is not true. sent5: if the fact that the antipyreticness does not occur is true that the plotting occurs and the manacling does not occur is not correct. sent6: the fact that the suffering facade does not occur is not wrong. sent7: the fact that both the plot and the manacling happens is not right if the antipyreticness does not occur. sent8: the fact that the prewarness does not occur is true if both the forgettableness and the melting happens. sent9: the plot does not occur if the fact that the Kenyanness does not occur and/or the recommending dressed does not occur is not true. sent10: that the welding but not the carpetbag occurs is false if the proteolyticness does not occur. sent11: if the fact that the antiapartheidness does not occur and the manacling does not occur does not hold then the antiapartheidness happens. sent12: the forgettableness happens. sent13: the forgettableness does not occur if the fact that either the manacling happens or the melting occurs or both does not hold. sent14: the posting happens. sent15: the non-entozoicness is caused by that the manacling occurs. sent16: the fact that the recommending Clinidae does not occur is correct. sent17: the fact that the plot and the manacling occurs is wrong. sent18: the melting happens. sent19: if that the plotting occurs and the manacling does not occur is not correct the entozoicness does not occur.
(¬{D} & ¬{C})
sent1: ¬{B} -> ({A} & {DT}) sent2: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{D} & ¬{C}) sent3: ¬{J} -> ({D} & {G}) sent4: ¬{F} -> ¬(¬{GE} & ¬{E}) sent5: ¬{G} -> ¬({F} & ¬{E}) sent6: ¬{JI} sent7: ¬{G} -> ¬({F} & {E}) sent8: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} sent9: ¬(¬{H} v ¬{I}) -> ¬{F} sent10: ¬{AD} -> ¬({ED} & ¬{CG}) sent11: ¬(¬{GE} & ¬{E}) -> {GE} sent12: {A} sent13: ¬({E} v {B}) -> ¬{A} sent14: {JC} sent15: {E} -> ¬{D} sent16: ¬{HJ} sent17: ¬({F} & {E}) sent18: {B} sent19: ¬({F} & ¬{E}) -> ¬{D}
[ "sent12 & sent18 -> int1: the forgettableness occurs and the melting occurs.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the prewarness does not occur.;" ]
UNKNOWN
[ "sent12 & sent18 -> int1: ({A} & {B}); int1 & sent8 -> int2: ¬{C};" ]
UNKNOWN
3
null
14
0
14
both the pyrotechnicsness and the antiapartheidness occurs.
({DT} & {GE})
7
[]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the non-entozoicness and the non-prewarness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the forgettableness happens and the pyrotechnicsness occurs if the melting does not occur. sent2: if the forgettableness does not occur then that the fact that the entozoicness does not occur and the prewarness does not occur is false is correct. sent3: the entozoicness occurs and the antipyretic occurs if the anticancerness does not occur. sent4: if the plotting does not occur then the fact that the antiapartheidness does not occur and the manacling does not occur is not true. sent5: if the fact that the antipyreticness does not occur is true that the plotting occurs and the manacling does not occur is not correct. sent6: the fact that the suffering facade does not occur is not wrong. sent7: the fact that both the plot and the manacling happens is not right if the antipyreticness does not occur. sent8: the fact that the prewarness does not occur is true if both the forgettableness and the melting happens. sent9: the plot does not occur if the fact that the Kenyanness does not occur and/or the recommending dressed does not occur is not true. sent10: that the welding but not the carpetbag occurs is false if the proteolyticness does not occur. sent11: if the fact that the antiapartheidness does not occur and the manacling does not occur does not hold then the antiapartheidness happens. sent12: the forgettableness happens. sent13: the forgettableness does not occur if the fact that either the manacling happens or the melting occurs or both does not hold. sent14: the posting happens. sent15: the non-entozoicness is caused by that the manacling occurs. sent16: the fact that the recommending Clinidae does not occur is correct. sent17: the fact that the plot and the manacling occurs is wrong. sent18: the melting happens. sent19: if that the plotting occurs and the manacling does not occur is not correct the entozoicness does not occur. ; $proof$ =
__UNKNOWN__
DeductionInstance
the forgettableness happens.
[ "the melting happens.", "the fact that the prewarness does not occur is true if both the forgettableness and the melting happens." ]
[ "It happens.", "The boringness happens." ]
The boringness happens.
the fact that the prewarness does not occur is true if both the forgettableness and the melting happens.
the spectrographicness occurs.
sent1: the autoradiographicness happens. sent2: the unhappiness occurs. sent3: if the ohmage does not occur then the fact that both the broadcast and the autoradiographicness happens is incorrect. sent4: both the hollowness and the suffering tokamak happens. sent5: if the traversing and the autoradiographicness happens the spectrographicness does not occur. sent6: the autoradiographicness does not occur if that the fact that the broadcast and the autoradiographicness occurs is right is incorrect. sent7: the traversing occurs. sent8: that the whirlpool does not occur is brought about by that the recommending duplicate and the shower occurs. sent9: the frisking does not occur if the anodicness and the mending happens. sent10: if that the autoradiographicness does not occur is correct then both the spectrographicness and the traversing occurs. sent11: the suffering peripeteia does not occur.
{C}
sent1: {B} sent2: {HK} sent3: ¬{D} -> ¬({E} & {B}) sent4: ({CR} & {FE}) sent5: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} sent6: ¬({E} & {B}) -> ¬{B} sent7: {A} sent8: ({BC} & {EG}) -> ¬{DT} sent9: ({CA} & {HH}) -> ¬{GN} sent10: ¬{B} -> ({C} & {A}) sent11: ¬{FT}
[ "sent7 & sent1 -> int1: both the traversing and the autoradiographicness happens.; sent5 & int1 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
[ "sent7 & sent1 -> int1: ({A} & {B}); sent5 & int1 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
2
2
8
0
8
the spectrographicness happens.
{C}
8
[]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the spectrographicness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the autoradiographicness happens. sent2: the unhappiness occurs. sent3: if the ohmage does not occur then the fact that both the broadcast and the autoradiographicness happens is incorrect. sent4: both the hollowness and the suffering tokamak happens. sent5: if the traversing and the autoradiographicness happens the spectrographicness does not occur. sent6: the autoradiographicness does not occur if that the fact that the broadcast and the autoradiographicness occurs is right is incorrect. sent7: the traversing occurs. sent8: that the whirlpool does not occur is brought about by that the recommending duplicate and the shower occurs. sent9: the frisking does not occur if the anodicness and the mending happens. sent10: if that the autoradiographicness does not occur is correct then both the spectrographicness and the traversing occurs. sent11: the suffering peripeteia does not occur. ; $proof$ =
sent7 & sent1 -> int1: both the traversing and the autoradiographicness happens.; sent5 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
DeductionInstance
the traversing occurs.
[ "the autoradiographicness happens.", "if the traversing and the autoradiographicness happens the spectrographicness does not occur." ]
[ "The traversing happens.", "The traversing occurs." ]
The traversing happens.
the autoradiographicness happens.
the spectrographicness occurs.
sent1: the autoradiographicness happens. sent2: the unhappiness occurs. sent3: if the ohmage does not occur then the fact that both the broadcast and the autoradiographicness happens is incorrect. sent4: both the hollowness and the suffering tokamak happens. sent5: if the traversing and the autoradiographicness happens the spectrographicness does not occur. sent6: the autoradiographicness does not occur if that the fact that the broadcast and the autoradiographicness occurs is right is incorrect. sent7: the traversing occurs. sent8: that the whirlpool does not occur is brought about by that the recommending duplicate and the shower occurs. sent9: the frisking does not occur if the anodicness and the mending happens. sent10: if that the autoradiographicness does not occur is correct then both the spectrographicness and the traversing occurs. sent11: the suffering peripeteia does not occur.
{C}
sent1: {B} sent2: {HK} sent3: ¬{D} -> ¬({E} & {B}) sent4: ({CR} & {FE}) sent5: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} sent6: ¬({E} & {B}) -> ¬{B} sent7: {A} sent8: ({BC} & {EG}) -> ¬{DT} sent9: ({CA} & {HH}) -> ¬{GN} sent10: ¬{B} -> ({C} & {A}) sent11: ¬{FT}
[ "sent7 & sent1 -> int1: both the traversing and the autoradiographicness happens.; sent5 & int1 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
[ "sent7 & sent1 -> int1: ({A} & {B}); sent5 & int1 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
2
2
8
0
8
the spectrographicness happens.
{C}
8
[]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the spectrographicness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the autoradiographicness happens. sent2: the unhappiness occurs. sent3: if the ohmage does not occur then the fact that both the broadcast and the autoradiographicness happens is incorrect. sent4: both the hollowness and the suffering tokamak happens. sent5: if the traversing and the autoradiographicness happens the spectrographicness does not occur. sent6: the autoradiographicness does not occur if that the fact that the broadcast and the autoradiographicness occurs is right is incorrect. sent7: the traversing occurs. sent8: that the whirlpool does not occur is brought about by that the recommending duplicate and the shower occurs. sent9: the frisking does not occur if the anodicness and the mending happens. sent10: if that the autoradiographicness does not occur is correct then both the spectrographicness and the traversing occurs. sent11: the suffering peripeteia does not occur. ; $proof$ =
sent7 & sent1 -> int1: both the traversing and the autoradiographicness happens.; sent5 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
DeductionInstance
the traversing occurs.
[ "the autoradiographicness happens.", "if the traversing and the autoradiographicness happens the spectrographicness does not occur." ]
[ "The traversing happens.", "The traversing occurs." ]
The traversing occurs.
if the traversing and the autoradiographicness happens the spectrographicness does not occur.
the fact that the inevitable occurs is true.
sent1: the fact that the natriureticness does not occur or the carbonating goral does not occur or both is false if the sterileness does not occur. sent2: the inevitableness does not occur if that either the natriureticness occurs or the carbonating goral does not occur or both does not hold. sent3: the genotypicalness occurs if the carbonating keratotomy happens. sent4: the sterileness occurs if the genotypicalness happens. sent5: if the sterileness happens then the inevitable occurs. sent6: the fact that the natriureticness happens hold. sent7: the sterileness does not occur. sent8: that the inevitable does not occur is true if the fact that the fact that the natriureticness does not occur or the carbonating goral does not occur or both is right is incorrect.
{B}
sent1: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{AA} v ¬{AB}) sent2: ¬({AA} v ¬{AB}) -> ¬{B} sent3: {D} -> {C} sent4: {C} -> {A} sent5: {A} -> {B} sent6: {AA} sent7: ¬{A} sent8: ¬(¬{AA} v ¬{AB}) -> ¬{B}
[ "sent1 & sent7 -> int1: the fact that the natriureticness does not occur or the carbonating goral does not occur or both is not right.; sent8 & int1 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
[ "sent1 & sent7 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA} v ¬{AB}); sent8 & int1 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
2
2
5
0
5
the inevitable happens.
{B}
8
[]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the inevitable occurs is true. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the natriureticness does not occur or the carbonating goral does not occur or both is false if the sterileness does not occur. sent2: the inevitableness does not occur if that either the natriureticness occurs or the carbonating goral does not occur or both does not hold. sent3: the genotypicalness occurs if the carbonating keratotomy happens. sent4: the sterileness occurs if the genotypicalness happens. sent5: if the sterileness happens then the inevitable occurs. sent6: the fact that the natriureticness happens hold. sent7: the sterileness does not occur. sent8: that the inevitable does not occur is true if the fact that the fact that the natriureticness does not occur or the carbonating goral does not occur or both is right is incorrect. ; $proof$ =
sent1 & sent7 -> int1: the fact that the natriureticness does not occur or the carbonating goral does not occur or both is not right.; sent8 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
DeductionInstance
the fact that the natriureticness does not occur or the carbonating goral does not occur or both is false if the sterileness does not occur.
[ "the sterileness does not occur.", "that the inevitable does not occur is true if the fact that the fact that the natriureticness does not occur or the carbonating goral does not occur or both is right is incorrect." ]
[ "If the sterileness does not occur, the natriureticness is false.", "If the sterileness does not occur, the natriureticness and carbonating goral are false." ]
If the sterileness does not occur, the natriureticness is false.
the sterileness does not occur.
the fact that the inevitable occurs is true.
sent1: the fact that the natriureticness does not occur or the carbonating goral does not occur or both is false if the sterileness does not occur. sent2: the inevitableness does not occur if that either the natriureticness occurs or the carbonating goral does not occur or both does not hold. sent3: the genotypicalness occurs if the carbonating keratotomy happens. sent4: the sterileness occurs if the genotypicalness happens. sent5: if the sterileness happens then the inevitable occurs. sent6: the fact that the natriureticness happens hold. sent7: the sterileness does not occur. sent8: that the inevitable does not occur is true if the fact that the fact that the natriureticness does not occur or the carbonating goral does not occur or both is right is incorrect.
{B}
sent1: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{AA} v ¬{AB}) sent2: ¬({AA} v ¬{AB}) -> ¬{B} sent3: {D} -> {C} sent4: {C} -> {A} sent5: {A} -> {B} sent6: {AA} sent7: ¬{A} sent8: ¬(¬{AA} v ¬{AB}) -> ¬{B}
[ "sent1 & sent7 -> int1: the fact that the natriureticness does not occur or the carbonating goral does not occur or both is not right.; sent8 & int1 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
[ "sent1 & sent7 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA} v ¬{AB}); sent8 & int1 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
2
2
5
0
5
the inevitable happens.
{B}
8
[]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the inevitable occurs is true. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the natriureticness does not occur or the carbonating goral does not occur or both is false if the sterileness does not occur. sent2: the inevitableness does not occur if that either the natriureticness occurs or the carbonating goral does not occur or both does not hold. sent3: the genotypicalness occurs if the carbonating keratotomy happens. sent4: the sterileness occurs if the genotypicalness happens. sent5: if the sterileness happens then the inevitable occurs. sent6: the fact that the natriureticness happens hold. sent7: the sterileness does not occur. sent8: that the inevitable does not occur is true if the fact that the fact that the natriureticness does not occur or the carbonating goral does not occur or both is right is incorrect. ; $proof$ =
sent1 & sent7 -> int1: the fact that the natriureticness does not occur or the carbonating goral does not occur or both is not right.; sent8 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
DeductionInstance
the fact that the natriureticness does not occur or the carbonating goral does not occur or both is false if the sterileness does not occur.
[ "the sterileness does not occur.", "that the inevitable does not occur is true if the fact that the fact that the natriureticness does not occur or the carbonating goral does not occur or both is right is incorrect." ]
[ "If the sterileness does not occur, the natriureticness is false.", "If the sterileness does not occur, the natriureticness and carbonating goral are false." ]
If the sterileness does not occur, the natriureticness and carbonating goral are false.
that the inevitable does not occur is true if the fact that the fact that the natriureticness does not occur or the carbonating goral does not occur or both is right is incorrect.
the initiate is a twenty-five.
sent1: if something is revolutionary it is a kind of a Unitarianism. sent2: if the rennet is astragalar but it is not a twenty-five the horse is not a kind of a twenty-five. sent3: the horse is revolutionary. sent4: if that something is not astragalar but it is Kazakhstani does not hold then it is astragalar. sent5: the initiate is revolutionary if that the horse is revolutionary hold. sent6: if the horse is a rake the fact that that it is a Anomia is not right is not correct. sent7: something is not a twenty-five if the fact that it is not revolutionary or it is a kind of a Unitarianism or both does not hold. sent8: if the horse is a kind of a Anomia the fact that it is not astragalar and is a Kazakhstani does not hold.
{B}{aa}
sent1: (x): {A}x -> {C}x sent2: ({D}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) -> ¬{B}{a} sent3: {A}{a} sent4: (x): ¬(¬{D}x & {E}x) -> {D}x sent5: {A}{a} -> {A}{aa} sent6: {G}{a} -> {F}{a} sent7: (x): ¬(¬{A}x v {C}x) -> ¬{B}x sent8: {F}{a} -> ¬(¬{D}{a} & {E}{a})
[ "void -> assump1: Let's assume that the initiate is not a twenty-five.; sent1 -> int1: if the initiate is revolutionary it is a Unitarianism.; sent5 & sent3 -> int2: the initiate is revolutionary.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the initiate is a kind of a Unitarianism.;" ]
UNKNOWN
[ "void -> assump1: ¬{B}{aa}; sent1 -> int1: {A}{aa} -> {C}{aa}; sent5 & sent3 -> int2: {A}{aa}; int1 & int2 -> int3: {C}{aa};" ]
UNKNOWN
4
null
5
0
5
that the horse is distinct is not wrong.
{AQ}{a}
5
[]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the initiate is a twenty-five. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is revolutionary it is a kind of a Unitarianism. sent2: if the rennet is astragalar but it is not a twenty-five the horse is not a kind of a twenty-five. sent3: the horse is revolutionary. sent4: if that something is not astragalar but it is Kazakhstani does not hold then it is astragalar. sent5: the initiate is revolutionary if that the horse is revolutionary hold. sent6: if the horse is a rake the fact that that it is a Anomia is not right is not correct. sent7: something is not a twenty-five if the fact that it is not revolutionary or it is a kind of a Unitarianism or both does not hold. sent8: if the horse is a kind of a Anomia the fact that it is not astragalar and is a Kazakhstani does not hold. ; $proof$ =
__UNKNOWN__
DeductionInstance
if something is revolutionary it is a kind of a Unitarianism.
[ "the initiate is revolutionary if that the horse is revolutionary hold.", "the horse is revolutionary." ]
[ "It is a kind of Unitarianism if something is revolutionary.", "It is a kind of Unitarianism if something is revolutionary." ]
It is a kind of Unitarianism if something is revolutionary.
the initiate is revolutionary if that the horse is revolutionary hold.
the initiate is a twenty-five.
sent1: if something is revolutionary it is a kind of a Unitarianism. sent2: if the rennet is astragalar but it is not a twenty-five the horse is not a kind of a twenty-five. sent3: the horse is revolutionary. sent4: if that something is not astragalar but it is Kazakhstani does not hold then it is astragalar. sent5: the initiate is revolutionary if that the horse is revolutionary hold. sent6: if the horse is a rake the fact that that it is a Anomia is not right is not correct. sent7: something is not a twenty-five if the fact that it is not revolutionary or it is a kind of a Unitarianism or both does not hold. sent8: if the horse is a kind of a Anomia the fact that it is not astragalar and is a Kazakhstani does not hold.
{B}{aa}
sent1: (x): {A}x -> {C}x sent2: ({D}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) -> ¬{B}{a} sent3: {A}{a} sent4: (x): ¬(¬{D}x & {E}x) -> {D}x sent5: {A}{a} -> {A}{aa} sent6: {G}{a} -> {F}{a} sent7: (x): ¬(¬{A}x v {C}x) -> ¬{B}x sent8: {F}{a} -> ¬(¬{D}{a} & {E}{a})
[ "void -> assump1: Let's assume that the initiate is not a twenty-five.; sent1 -> int1: if the initiate is revolutionary it is a Unitarianism.; sent5 & sent3 -> int2: the initiate is revolutionary.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the initiate is a kind of a Unitarianism.;" ]
UNKNOWN
[ "void -> assump1: ¬{B}{aa}; sent1 -> int1: {A}{aa} -> {C}{aa}; sent5 & sent3 -> int2: {A}{aa}; int1 & int2 -> int3: {C}{aa};" ]
UNKNOWN
4
null
5
0
5
that the horse is distinct is not wrong.
{AQ}{a}
5
[]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the initiate is a twenty-five. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is revolutionary it is a kind of a Unitarianism. sent2: if the rennet is astragalar but it is not a twenty-five the horse is not a kind of a twenty-five. sent3: the horse is revolutionary. sent4: if that something is not astragalar but it is Kazakhstani does not hold then it is astragalar. sent5: the initiate is revolutionary if that the horse is revolutionary hold. sent6: if the horse is a rake the fact that that it is a Anomia is not right is not correct. sent7: something is not a twenty-five if the fact that it is not revolutionary or it is a kind of a Unitarianism or both does not hold. sent8: if the horse is a kind of a Anomia the fact that it is not astragalar and is a Kazakhstani does not hold. ; $proof$ =
__UNKNOWN__
DeductionInstance
if something is revolutionary it is a kind of a Unitarianism.
[ "the initiate is revolutionary if that the horse is revolutionary hold.", "the horse is revolutionary." ]
[ "It is a kind of Unitarianism if something is revolutionary.", "It is a kind of Unitarianism if something is revolutionary." ]
It is a kind of Unitarianism if something is revolutionary.
the horse is revolutionary.
the lagomorph is not higher.
sent1: the fact that the pearl is a Shiism but it is not a kind of a ngwee is not correct. sent2: the fact that something is non-higher thing that is not a kind of a rib does not hold if it is not a muscleman. sent3: the departer is not higher. sent4: the lagomorph is not a punks. sent5: if that the lagomorph is not a rib and not a punks is not wrong then it is higher. sent6: the lagomorph is a kind of ruminant thing that is non-deflationary. sent7: if the fact that the pearl is a Shiism but it is not a ngwee does not hold the sweeper is not a Shiism. sent8: if the egghead does not rib and is not an incidence it carbonates prompter. sent9: something does rib and/or it is not a muscleman if it is a kind of a punks. sent10: that something does confer and/or carbonates gastrostomy is wrong if it does not sob rhizopod. sent11: something is a kind of a muscleman. sent12: if the lagomorph is not a muscleman the plankton is not a rib and not a Scottie. sent13: the lagomorph is not a kind of a punks if there exists something such that it is a kind of a muscleman. sent14: if there is something such that that it sobs independence and does sob rhizopod is incorrect the saltbox does not sob rhizopod. sent15: the fact that the sweeper does sob independence and it does sob rhizopod is incorrect if it is not a kind of a Shiism. sent16: there exists something such that it does carbonate gastrostomy. sent17: that the lagomorph is not higher is not wrong if that the European is not higher and it is not a rib is false. sent18: something is higher. sent19: the lagomorph does not rib and it is not a punks if there is something such that it is a muscleman. sent20: if something is a kind of a punks that the fact that it is a kind of a muscleman and it is not a rib is not false is not true. sent21: if the sweeper does confer the fact that it is not a kind of a punks and it does not carbonate gastrostomy is not correct. sent22: that the lagomorph is a Leicestershire hold if it is not a today and is not a muscleman. sent23: the lagomorph is higher if the fact that it does not rib and it is a punks is right.
¬{D}{a}
sent1: ¬({I}{e} & ¬{K}{e}) sent2: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{D}x & ¬{B}x) sent3: ¬{D}{bm} sent4: ¬{C}{a} sent5: (¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> {D}{a} sent6: (¬{EJ}{a} & ¬{FN}{a}) sent7: ¬({I}{e} & ¬{K}{e}) -> ¬{I}{d} sent8: (¬{B}{du} & ¬{HB}{du}) -> {HT}{du} sent9: (x): {C}x -> ({B}x v ¬{A}x) sent10: (x): ¬{G}x -> ¬({F}x v {E}x) sent11: (Ex): {A}x sent12: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{B}{ao} & ¬{FO}{ao}) sent13: (x): {A}x -> ¬{C}{a} sent14: (x): ¬({H}x & {G}x) -> ¬{G}{c} sent15: ¬{I}{d} -> ¬({H}{d} & {G}{d}) sent16: (Ex): {E}x sent17: ¬(¬{D}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) -> ¬{D}{a} sent18: (Ex): {D}x sent19: (x): {A}x -> (¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent20: (x): {C}x -> ¬({A}x & ¬{B}x) sent21: {F}{d} -> ¬(¬{C}{d} & ¬{E}{d}) sent22: (¬{DU}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) -> {CG}{a} sent23: (¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}) -> {D}{a}
[ "sent11 & sent19 -> int1: the lagomorph is not a rib and not a punks.; int1 & sent5 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
[ "sent11 & sent19 -> int1: (¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}); int1 & sent5 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
2
2
20
0
20
the lagomorph is not higher.
¬{D}{a}
7
[ "sent2 -> int2: the fact that the European is not higher and is not a rib does not hold if it is not a muscleman.;" ]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the lagomorph is not higher. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the pearl is a Shiism but it is not a kind of a ngwee is not correct. sent2: the fact that something is non-higher thing that is not a kind of a rib does not hold if it is not a muscleman. sent3: the departer is not higher. sent4: the lagomorph is not a punks. sent5: if that the lagomorph is not a rib and not a punks is not wrong then it is higher. sent6: the lagomorph is a kind of ruminant thing that is non-deflationary. sent7: if the fact that the pearl is a Shiism but it is not a ngwee does not hold the sweeper is not a Shiism. sent8: if the egghead does not rib and is not an incidence it carbonates prompter. sent9: something does rib and/or it is not a muscleman if it is a kind of a punks. sent10: that something does confer and/or carbonates gastrostomy is wrong if it does not sob rhizopod. sent11: something is a kind of a muscleman. sent12: if the lagomorph is not a muscleman the plankton is not a rib and not a Scottie. sent13: the lagomorph is not a kind of a punks if there exists something such that it is a kind of a muscleman. sent14: if there is something such that that it sobs independence and does sob rhizopod is incorrect the saltbox does not sob rhizopod. sent15: the fact that the sweeper does sob independence and it does sob rhizopod is incorrect if it is not a kind of a Shiism. sent16: there exists something such that it does carbonate gastrostomy. sent17: that the lagomorph is not higher is not wrong if that the European is not higher and it is not a rib is false. sent18: something is higher. sent19: the lagomorph does not rib and it is not a punks if there is something such that it is a muscleman. sent20: if something is a kind of a punks that the fact that it is a kind of a muscleman and it is not a rib is not false is not true. sent21: if the sweeper does confer the fact that it is not a kind of a punks and it does not carbonate gastrostomy is not correct. sent22: that the lagomorph is a Leicestershire hold if it is not a today and is not a muscleman. sent23: the lagomorph is higher if the fact that it does not rib and it is a punks is right. ; $proof$ =
sent11 & sent19 -> int1: the lagomorph is not a rib and not a punks.; int1 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
DeductionInstance
something is a kind of a muscleman.
[ "the lagomorph does not rib and it is not a punks if there is something such that it is a muscleman.", "if that the lagomorph is not a rib and not a punks is not wrong then it is higher." ]
[ "A muscleman is something like that.", "A muscleman is what it is." ]
A muscleman is something like that.
the lagomorph does not rib and it is not a punks if there is something such that it is a muscleman.
the lagomorph is not higher.
sent1: the fact that the pearl is a Shiism but it is not a kind of a ngwee is not correct. sent2: the fact that something is non-higher thing that is not a kind of a rib does not hold if it is not a muscleman. sent3: the departer is not higher. sent4: the lagomorph is not a punks. sent5: if that the lagomorph is not a rib and not a punks is not wrong then it is higher. sent6: the lagomorph is a kind of ruminant thing that is non-deflationary. sent7: if the fact that the pearl is a Shiism but it is not a ngwee does not hold the sweeper is not a Shiism. sent8: if the egghead does not rib and is not an incidence it carbonates prompter. sent9: something does rib and/or it is not a muscleman if it is a kind of a punks. sent10: that something does confer and/or carbonates gastrostomy is wrong if it does not sob rhizopod. sent11: something is a kind of a muscleman. sent12: if the lagomorph is not a muscleman the plankton is not a rib and not a Scottie. sent13: the lagomorph is not a kind of a punks if there exists something such that it is a kind of a muscleman. sent14: if there is something such that that it sobs independence and does sob rhizopod is incorrect the saltbox does not sob rhizopod. sent15: the fact that the sweeper does sob independence and it does sob rhizopod is incorrect if it is not a kind of a Shiism. sent16: there exists something such that it does carbonate gastrostomy. sent17: that the lagomorph is not higher is not wrong if that the European is not higher and it is not a rib is false. sent18: something is higher. sent19: the lagomorph does not rib and it is not a punks if there is something such that it is a muscleman. sent20: if something is a kind of a punks that the fact that it is a kind of a muscleman and it is not a rib is not false is not true. sent21: if the sweeper does confer the fact that it is not a kind of a punks and it does not carbonate gastrostomy is not correct. sent22: that the lagomorph is a Leicestershire hold if it is not a today and is not a muscleman. sent23: the lagomorph is higher if the fact that it does not rib and it is a punks is right.
¬{D}{a}
sent1: ¬({I}{e} & ¬{K}{e}) sent2: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{D}x & ¬{B}x) sent3: ¬{D}{bm} sent4: ¬{C}{a} sent5: (¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> {D}{a} sent6: (¬{EJ}{a} & ¬{FN}{a}) sent7: ¬({I}{e} & ¬{K}{e}) -> ¬{I}{d} sent8: (¬{B}{du} & ¬{HB}{du}) -> {HT}{du} sent9: (x): {C}x -> ({B}x v ¬{A}x) sent10: (x): ¬{G}x -> ¬({F}x v {E}x) sent11: (Ex): {A}x sent12: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{B}{ao} & ¬{FO}{ao}) sent13: (x): {A}x -> ¬{C}{a} sent14: (x): ¬({H}x & {G}x) -> ¬{G}{c} sent15: ¬{I}{d} -> ¬({H}{d} & {G}{d}) sent16: (Ex): {E}x sent17: ¬(¬{D}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) -> ¬{D}{a} sent18: (Ex): {D}x sent19: (x): {A}x -> (¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent20: (x): {C}x -> ¬({A}x & ¬{B}x) sent21: {F}{d} -> ¬(¬{C}{d} & ¬{E}{d}) sent22: (¬{DU}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) -> {CG}{a} sent23: (¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}) -> {D}{a}
[ "sent11 & sent19 -> int1: the lagomorph is not a rib and not a punks.; int1 & sent5 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
[ "sent11 & sent19 -> int1: (¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}); int1 & sent5 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
2
2
20
0
20
the lagomorph is not higher.
¬{D}{a}
7
[ "sent2 -> int2: the fact that the European is not higher and is not a rib does not hold if it is not a muscleman.;" ]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the lagomorph is not higher. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the pearl is a Shiism but it is not a kind of a ngwee is not correct. sent2: the fact that something is non-higher thing that is not a kind of a rib does not hold if it is not a muscleman. sent3: the departer is not higher. sent4: the lagomorph is not a punks. sent5: if that the lagomorph is not a rib and not a punks is not wrong then it is higher. sent6: the lagomorph is a kind of ruminant thing that is non-deflationary. sent7: if the fact that the pearl is a Shiism but it is not a ngwee does not hold the sweeper is not a Shiism. sent8: if the egghead does not rib and is not an incidence it carbonates prompter. sent9: something does rib and/or it is not a muscleman if it is a kind of a punks. sent10: that something does confer and/or carbonates gastrostomy is wrong if it does not sob rhizopod. sent11: something is a kind of a muscleman. sent12: if the lagomorph is not a muscleman the plankton is not a rib and not a Scottie. sent13: the lagomorph is not a kind of a punks if there exists something such that it is a kind of a muscleman. sent14: if there is something such that that it sobs independence and does sob rhizopod is incorrect the saltbox does not sob rhizopod. sent15: the fact that the sweeper does sob independence and it does sob rhizopod is incorrect if it is not a kind of a Shiism. sent16: there exists something such that it does carbonate gastrostomy. sent17: that the lagomorph is not higher is not wrong if that the European is not higher and it is not a rib is false. sent18: something is higher. sent19: the lagomorph does not rib and it is not a punks if there is something such that it is a muscleman. sent20: if something is a kind of a punks that the fact that it is a kind of a muscleman and it is not a rib is not false is not true. sent21: if the sweeper does confer the fact that it is not a kind of a punks and it does not carbonate gastrostomy is not correct. sent22: that the lagomorph is a Leicestershire hold if it is not a today and is not a muscleman. sent23: the lagomorph is higher if the fact that it does not rib and it is a punks is right. ; $proof$ =
sent11 & sent19 -> int1: the lagomorph is not a rib and not a punks.; int1 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
DeductionInstance
something is a kind of a muscleman.
[ "the lagomorph does not rib and it is not a punks if there is something such that it is a muscleman.", "if that the lagomorph is not a rib and not a punks is not wrong then it is higher." ]
[ "A muscleman is something like that.", "A muscleman is what it is." ]
A muscleman is what it is.
if that the lagomorph is not a rib and not a punks is not wrong then it is higher.
that if the anthurium is photomechanical the snowdrop is a Menninger is incorrect.
sent1: the kingfish does not carbonate LF. sent2: the snowdrop is a kind of a Menninger if the kingfish does not carbonate LF and is gestational. sent3: if the anthurium is photomechanical then the kingfish does not carbonate LF. sent4: something sobs skin-diver and it does crack if it is not a blacklist. sent5: there exists nothing that is a Champollion and is a blacklist. sent6: the postmistress is a rugged if the anthurium is a crack. sent7: if the kingfish does carbonate LF and is gestational the snowdrop is a kind of a Menninger. sent8: if something is a Menninger it is photomechanical. sent9: if the fact that something is a Champollion and it blacklists is not right that it does not blacklists is not false. sent10: the fact that something that is a rugged is a Menninger is correct. sent11: the anthurium does not carbonate LF and is photomechanical. sent12: the visionary is not a Menninger but a king. sent13: the kingfish does not carbonate LF but it is gestational if the anthurium is photomechanical.
¬({A}{a} -> {B}{c})
sent1: ¬{AA}{b} sent2: (¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) -> {B}{c} sent3: {A}{a} -> ¬{AA}{b} sent4: (x): ¬{F}x -> ({E}x & {D}x) sent5: (x): ¬({G}x & {F}x) sent6: {D}{a} -> {C}{ih} sent7: ({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) -> {B}{c} sent8: (x): {B}x -> {A}x sent9: (x): ¬({G}x & {F}x) -> ¬{F}x sent10: (x): {C}x -> {B}x sent11: (¬{AA}{a} & {A}{a}) sent12: (¬{B}{cc} & {DR}{cc}) sent13: {A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b})
[ "void -> assump1: Let's assume that the anthurium is photomechanical.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the kingfish does not carbonate LF but it is gestational.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: the snowdrop is a Menninger.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
[ "void -> assump1: {A}{a}; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: (¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}); sent2 & int1 -> int2: {B}{c}; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
3
3
11
0
11
that the postmistress is photomechanical is correct.
{A}{ih}
7
[ "sent8 -> int3: if the postmistress is a kind of a Menninger then it is photomechanical.; sent10 -> int4: the fact that the postmistress is the Menninger if the postmistress is a rugged is correct.; sent4 -> int5: if the anthurium is not a blacklist then it does sob skin-diver and cracks.; sent9 -> int6: the anthurium is not a kind of a blacklist if that the fact that it is a Champollion and it blacklist is not false is not true.; sent5 -> int7: that the anthurium is a Champollion and it is a blacklist is wrong.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the anthurium does not blacklist.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the anthurium sobs skin-diver and it cracks.; int9 -> int10: the anthurium is a crack.; sent6 & int10 -> int11: the postmistress is a kind of a rugged.; int4 & int11 -> int12: the fact that the postmistress is a kind of a Menninger is true.; int3 & int12 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
PROVED
$hypothesis$ = that if the anthurium is photomechanical the snowdrop is a Menninger is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the kingfish does not carbonate LF. sent2: the snowdrop is a kind of a Menninger if the kingfish does not carbonate LF and is gestational. sent3: if the anthurium is photomechanical then the kingfish does not carbonate LF. sent4: something sobs skin-diver and it does crack if it is not a blacklist. sent5: there exists nothing that is a Champollion and is a blacklist. sent6: the postmistress is a rugged if the anthurium is a crack. sent7: if the kingfish does carbonate LF and is gestational the snowdrop is a kind of a Menninger. sent8: if something is a Menninger it is photomechanical. sent9: if the fact that something is a Champollion and it blacklists is not right that it does not blacklists is not false. sent10: the fact that something that is a rugged is a Menninger is correct. sent11: the anthurium does not carbonate LF and is photomechanical. sent12: the visionary is not a Menninger but a king. sent13: the kingfish does not carbonate LF but it is gestational if the anthurium is photomechanical. ; $proof$ =
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the anthurium is photomechanical.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the kingfish does not carbonate LF but it is gestational.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: the snowdrop is a Menninger.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
DeductionInstance
the kingfish does not carbonate LF but it is gestational if the anthurium is photomechanical.
[ "the snowdrop is a kind of a Menninger if the kingfish does not carbonate LF and is gestational." ]
[ "the kingfish does not carbonate LF but it is gestational if the anthurium is photomechanical." ]
the kingfish does not carbonate LF but it is gestational if the anthurium is photomechanical.
the snowdrop is a kind of a Menninger if the kingfish does not carbonate LF and is gestational.
the paleolithicness does not occur.
sent1: the viscometry occurs and the Kwanzaa does not occur. sent2: if both the carbonating daiquiri and the presentation occurs then the paleolithicness does not occur. sent3: the presentation does not occur. sent4: that the booing does not occur is caused by that both the penumbralness and the non-Azerbaijaniness occurs. sent5: if the formal does not occur then the fact that that the bleeding happens and the disposition happens is not correct is not false. sent6: if the worsted does not occur then the presentation does not occur. sent7: the informing and the non-Ottomanness happens. sent8: the multiformness does not occur. sent9: that the worstedness does not occur causes that the carbonating daiquiri happens but the presentation does not occur. sent10: the discourteousness but not the cession happens if the enjoyment does not occur. sent11: the anathematization does not occur. sent12: the embezzlement but not the devising occurs if the Jacobean does not occur. sent13: that the by-line does not occur and the interception does not occur is triggered by that the dacoity does not occur. sent14: the epizoicness and the non-kinestheticness occurs. sent15: the airburst and the non-penumbralness occurs if that the carbonating pop does not occur hold. sent16: if the by-line does not occur both the worstedness and the paleolithicness happens. sent17: the formalness does not occur if that the formalness happens but the pant does not occur is wrong. sent18: the Azerbaijani and the humaneness occurs. sent19: the carbonating theoterrorism occurs or the innings happens or both if the disposition does not occur. sent20: the fact that the formalness happens and the pant does not occur is incorrect if the inculpatoriness happens. sent21: that the paleolithicness happens is prevented by that the carbonating daiquiri happens but the presentation does not occur. sent22: the worsting does not occur. sent23: if the fact that both the bleeding and the disposition happens is false then the disposition does not occur.
¬{B}
sent1: ({GL} & ¬{EJ}) sent2: ({AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} sent3: ¬{AB} sent4: ({HN} & ¬{FE}) -> ¬{DK} sent5: ¬{I} -> ¬({J} & {H}) sent6: ¬{A} -> ¬{AB} sent7: ({IJ} & ¬{GC}) sent8: ¬{DR} sent9: ¬{A} -> ({AA} & ¬{AB}) sent10: ¬{IB} -> ({IF} & ¬{BA}) sent11: ¬{FC} sent12: ¬{IT} -> ({AI} & ¬{FB}) sent13: ¬{E} -> (¬{C} & ¬{D}) sent14: ({ID} & ¬{AG}) sent15: ¬{M} -> ({AE} & ¬{HN}) sent16: ¬{C} -> ({A} & {B}) sent17: ¬({I} & ¬{K}) -> ¬{I} sent18: ({FE} & ¬{AL}) sent19: ¬{H} -> ({F} v {G}) sent20: {L} -> ¬({I} & ¬{K}) sent21: ({AA} & ¬{AB}) -> ¬{B} sent22: ¬{A} sent23: ¬({J} & {H}) -> ¬{H}
[ "sent9 & sent22 -> int1: the carbonating daiquiri happens and the presentation does not occur.; sent21 & int1 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
[ "sent9 & sent22 -> int1: ({AA} & ¬{AB}); sent21 & int1 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
2
2
20
0
20
the paleolithicness occurs.
{B}
12
[]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the paleolithicness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the viscometry occurs and the Kwanzaa does not occur. sent2: if both the carbonating daiquiri and the presentation occurs then the paleolithicness does not occur. sent3: the presentation does not occur. sent4: that the booing does not occur is caused by that both the penumbralness and the non-Azerbaijaniness occurs. sent5: if the formal does not occur then the fact that that the bleeding happens and the disposition happens is not correct is not false. sent6: if the worsted does not occur then the presentation does not occur. sent7: the informing and the non-Ottomanness happens. sent8: the multiformness does not occur. sent9: that the worstedness does not occur causes that the carbonating daiquiri happens but the presentation does not occur. sent10: the discourteousness but not the cession happens if the enjoyment does not occur. sent11: the anathematization does not occur. sent12: the embezzlement but not the devising occurs if the Jacobean does not occur. sent13: that the by-line does not occur and the interception does not occur is triggered by that the dacoity does not occur. sent14: the epizoicness and the non-kinestheticness occurs. sent15: the airburst and the non-penumbralness occurs if that the carbonating pop does not occur hold. sent16: if the by-line does not occur both the worstedness and the paleolithicness happens. sent17: the formalness does not occur if that the formalness happens but the pant does not occur is wrong. sent18: the Azerbaijani and the humaneness occurs. sent19: the carbonating theoterrorism occurs or the innings happens or both if the disposition does not occur. sent20: the fact that the formalness happens and the pant does not occur is incorrect if the inculpatoriness happens. sent21: that the paleolithicness happens is prevented by that the carbonating daiquiri happens but the presentation does not occur. sent22: the worsting does not occur. sent23: if the fact that both the bleeding and the disposition happens is false then the disposition does not occur. ; $proof$ =
sent9 & sent22 -> int1: the carbonating daiquiri happens and the presentation does not occur.; sent21 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
DeductionInstance
that the worstedness does not occur causes that the carbonating daiquiri happens but the presentation does not occur.
[ "the worsting does not occur.", "that the paleolithicness happens is prevented by that the carbonating daiquiri happens but the presentation does not occur." ]
[ "The carbonating daiquiri happens but the presentation doesn't.", "The presentation does not occur because the worstedness does not occur." ]
The carbonating daiquiri happens but the presentation doesn't.
the worsting does not occur.
the paleolithicness does not occur.
sent1: the viscometry occurs and the Kwanzaa does not occur. sent2: if both the carbonating daiquiri and the presentation occurs then the paleolithicness does not occur. sent3: the presentation does not occur. sent4: that the booing does not occur is caused by that both the penumbralness and the non-Azerbaijaniness occurs. sent5: if the formal does not occur then the fact that that the bleeding happens and the disposition happens is not correct is not false. sent6: if the worsted does not occur then the presentation does not occur. sent7: the informing and the non-Ottomanness happens. sent8: the multiformness does not occur. sent9: that the worstedness does not occur causes that the carbonating daiquiri happens but the presentation does not occur. sent10: the discourteousness but not the cession happens if the enjoyment does not occur. sent11: the anathematization does not occur. sent12: the embezzlement but not the devising occurs if the Jacobean does not occur. sent13: that the by-line does not occur and the interception does not occur is triggered by that the dacoity does not occur. sent14: the epizoicness and the non-kinestheticness occurs. sent15: the airburst and the non-penumbralness occurs if that the carbonating pop does not occur hold. sent16: if the by-line does not occur both the worstedness and the paleolithicness happens. sent17: the formalness does not occur if that the formalness happens but the pant does not occur is wrong. sent18: the Azerbaijani and the humaneness occurs. sent19: the carbonating theoterrorism occurs or the innings happens or both if the disposition does not occur. sent20: the fact that the formalness happens and the pant does not occur is incorrect if the inculpatoriness happens. sent21: that the paleolithicness happens is prevented by that the carbonating daiquiri happens but the presentation does not occur. sent22: the worsting does not occur. sent23: if the fact that both the bleeding and the disposition happens is false then the disposition does not occur.
¬{B}
sent1: ({GL} & ¬{EJ}) sent2: ({AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} sent3: ¬{AB} sent4: ({HN} & ¬{FE}) -> ¬{DK} sent5: ¬{I} -> ¬({J} & {H}) sent6: ¬{A} -> ¬{AB} sent7: ({IJ} & ¬{GC}) sent8: ¬{DR} sent9: ¬{A} -> ({AA} & ¬{AB}) sent10: ¬{IB} -> ({IF} & ¬{BA}) sent11: ¬{FC} sent12: ¬{IT} -> ({AI} & ¬{FB}) sent13: ¬{E} -> (¬{C} & ¬{D}) sent14: ({ID} & ¬{AG}) sent15: ¬{M} -> ({AE} & ¬{HN}) sent16: ¬{C} -> ({A} & {B}) sent17: ¬({I} & ¬{K}) -> ¬{I} sent18: ({FE} & ¬{AL}) sent19: ¬{H} -> ({F} v {G}) sent20: {L} -> ¬({I} & ¬{K}) sent21: ({AA} & ¬{AB}) -> ¬{B} sent22: ¬{A} sent23: ¬({J} & {H}) -> ¬{H}
[ "sent9 & sent22 -> int1: the carbonating daiquiri happens and the presentation does not occur.; sent21 & int1 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
[ "sent9 & sent22 -> int1: ({AA} & ¬{AB}); sent21 & int1 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
2
2
20
0
20
the paleolithicness occurs.
{B}
12
[]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the paleolithicness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the viscometry occurs and the Kwanzaa does not occur. sent2: if both the carbonating daiquiri and the presentation occurs then the paleolithicness does not occur. sent3: the presentation does not occur. sent4: that the booing does not occur is caused by that both the penumbralness and the non-Azerbaijaniness occurs. sent5: if the formal does not occur then the fact that that the bleeding happens and the disposition happens is not correct is not false. sent6: if the worsted does not occur then the presentation does not occur. sent7: the informing and the non-Ottomanness happens. sent8: the multiformness does not occur. sent9: that the worstedness does not occur causes that the carbonating daiquiri happens but the presentation does not occur. sent10: the discourteousness but not the cession happens if the enjoyment does not occur. sent11: the anathematization does not occur. sent12: the embezzlement but not the devising occurs if the Jacobean does not occur. sent13: that the by-line does not occur and the interception does not occur is triggered by that the dacoity does not occur. sent14: the epizoicness and the non-kinestheticness occurs. sent15: the airburst and the non-penumbralness occurs if that the carbonating pop does not occur hold. sent16: if the by-line does not occur both the worstedness and the paleolithicness happens. sent17: the formalness does not occur if that the formalness happens but the pant does not occur is wrong. sent18: the Azerbaijani and the humaneness occurs. sent19: the carbonating theoterrorism occurs or the innings happens or both if the disposition does not occur. sent20: the fact that the formalness happens and the pant does not occur is incorrect if the inculpatoriness happens. sent21: that the paleolithicness happens is prevented by that the carbonating daiquiri happens but the presentation does not occur. sent22: the worsting does not occur. sent23: if the fact that both the bleeding and the disposition happens is false then the disposition does not occur. ; $proof$ =
sent9 & sent22 -> int1: the carbonating daiquiri happens and the presentation does not occur.; sent21 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
DeductionInstance
that the worstedness does not occur causes that the carbonating daiquiri happens but the presentation does not occur.
[ "the worsting does not occur.", "that the paleolithicness happens is prevented by that the carbonating daiquiri happens but the presentation does not occur." ]
[ "The carbonating daiquiri happens but the presentation doesn't.", "The presentation does not occur because the worstedness does not occur." ]
The presentation does not occur because the worstedness does not occur.
that the paleolithicness happens is prevented by that the carbonating daiquiri happens but the presentation does not occur.
the fact that the diphenhydramine is not a viewers is not incorrect.
sent1: the diphenhydramine is a midst. sent2: the diphenhydramine is a midst and a hatband if there exists something such that it does round. sent3: the soursop is a kind of a viewers. sent4: the showpiece is operculate. sent5: the fact that something is a viewers if it is a hatband is right. sent6: the diphenhydramine is a midst if there exists something such that it rounds. sent7: there exists something such that it does round. sent8: if the fact that the Berry is Merovingian and it is a Gloucester does not hold that it is not unitary is not false. sent9: if something is non-unitary then it is not a midst and is a hatband.
¬{D}{a}
sent1: {B}{a} sent2: (x): {A}x -> ({B}{a} & {C}{a}) sent3: {D}{ho} sent4: {CR}{ij} sent5: (x): {C}x -> {D}x sent6: (x): {A}x -> {B}{a} sent7: (Ex): {A}x sent8: ¬({G}{c} & {F}{c}) -> ¬{E}{c} sent9: (x): ¬{E}x -> (¬{B}x & {C}x)
[ "sent7 & sent2 -> int1: the diphenhydramine is a kind of a midst and it is a kind of a hatband.; int1 -> int2: the diphenhydramine is a hatband.; sent5 -> int3: if the diphenhydramine is a hatband then it is a viewers.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
[ "sent7 & sent2 -> int1: ({B}{a} & {C}{a}); int1 -> int2: {C}{a}; sent5 -> int3: {C}{a} -> {D}{a}; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
3
3
6
0
6
the diphenhydramine is not a viewers.
¬{D}{a}
6
[ "sent9 -> int4: if the Berry is not unitary it is not a midst and it is a hatband.;" ]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the diphenhydramine is not a viewers is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the diphenhydramine is a midst. sent2: the diphenhydramine is a midst and a hatband if there exists something such that it does round. sent3: the soursop is a kind of a viewers. sent4: the showpiece is operculate. sent5: the fact that something is a viewers if it is a hatband is right. sent6: the diphenhydramine is a midst if there exists something such that it rounds. sent7: there exists something such that it does round. sent8: if the fact that the Berry is Merovingian and it is a Gloucester does not hold that it is not unitary is not false. sent9: if something is non-unitary then it is not a midst and is a hatband. ; $proof$ =
sent7 & sent2 -> int1: the diphenhydramine is a kind of a midst and it is a kind of a hatband.; int1 -> int2: the diphenhydramine is a hatband.; sent5 -> int3: if the diphenhydramine is a hatband then it is a viewers.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
DeductionInstance
there exists something such that it does round.
[ "the diphenhydramine is a midst and a hatband if there exists something such that it does round.", "the fact that something is a viewers if it is a hatband is right." ]
[ "There is something that does round.", "There is something like that that does round." ]
There is something that does round.
the diphenhydramine is a midst and a hatband if there exists something such that it does round.
the fact that the diphenhydramine is not a viewers is not incorrect.
sent1: the diphenhydramine is a midst. sent2: the diphenhydramine is a midst and a hatband if there exists something such that it does round. sent3: the soursop is a kind of a viewers. sent4: the showpiece is operculate. sent5: the fact that something is a viewers if it is a hatband is right. sent6: the diphenhydramine is a midst if there exists something such that it rounds. sent7: there exists something such that it does round. sent8: if the fact that the Berry is Merovingian and it is a Gloucester does not hold that it is not unitary is not false. sent9: if something is non-unitary then it is not a midst and is a hatband.
¬{D}{a}
sent1: {B}{a} sent2: (x): {A}x -> ({B}{a} & {C}{a}) sent3: {D}{ho} sent4: {CR}{ij} sent5: (x): {C}x -> {D}x sent6: (x): {A}x -> {B}{a} sent7: (Ex): {A}x sent8: ¬({G}{c} & {F}{c}) -> ¬{E}{c} sent9: (x): ¬{E}x -> (¬{B}x & {C}x)
[ "sent7 & sent2 -> int1: the diphenhydramine is a kind of a midst and it is a kind of a hatband.; int1 -> int2: the diphenhydramine is a hatband.; sent5 -> int3: if the diphenhydramine is a hatband then it is a viewers.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
[ "sent7 & sent2 -> int1: ({B}{a} & {C}{a}); int1 -> int2: {C}{a}; sent5 -> int3: {C}{a} -> {D}{a}; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
3
3
6
0
6
the diphenhydramine is not a viewers.
¬{D}{a}
6
[ "sent9 -> int4: if the Berry is not unitary it is not a midst and it is a hatband.;" ]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the diphenhydramine is not a viewers is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the diphenhydramine is a midst. sent2: the diphenhydramine is a midst and a hatband if there exists something such that it does round. sent3: the soursop is a kind of a viewers. sent4: the showpiece is operculate. sent5: the fact that something is a viewers if it is a hatband is right. sent6: the diphenhydramine is a midst if there exists something such that it rounds. sent7: there exists something such that it does round. sent8: if the fact that the Berry is Merovingian and it is a Gloucester does not hold that it is not unitary is not false. sent9: if something is non-unitary then it is not a midst and is a hatband. ; $proof$ =
sent7 & sent2 -> int1: the diphenhydramine is a kind of a midst and it is a kind of a hatband.; int1 -> int2: the diphenhydramine is a hatband.; sent5 -> int3: if the diphenhydramine is a hatband then it is a viewers.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
DeductionInstance
there exists something such that it does round.
[ "the diphenhydramine is a midst and a hatband if there exists something such that it does round.", "the fact that something is a viewers if it is a hatband is right." ]
[ "There is something that does round.", "There is something like that that does round." ]
There is something like that that does round.
the fact that something is a viewers if it is a hatband is right.
the dracaena is not a hornblende.
sent1: if the fact that the barnacle is salivary is not false the dracaena is a hornblende. sent2: if the volatile sobs secondo the barnacle is salivary. sent3: The secondo sobs volatile. sent4: the volatile sobs secondo.
¬{C}{c}
sent1: {B}{b} -> {C}{c} sent2: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} sent3: {AA}{aa} sent4: {A}{a}
[ "sent2 & sent4 -> int1: that the barnacle is salivary is true.; sent1 & int1 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
[ "sent2 & sent4 -> int1: {B}{b}; sent1 & int1 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
2
2
1
0
1
null
null
null
[]
null
null
$hypothesis$ = the dracaena is not a hornblende. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the barnacle is salivary is not false the dracaena is a hornblende. sent2: if the volatile sobs secondo the barnacle is salivary. sent3: The secondo sobs volatile. sent4: the volatile sobs secondo. ; $proof$ =
sent2 & sent4 -> int1: that the barnacle is salivary is true.; sent1 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
DeductionInstance
if the volatile sobs secondo the barnacle is salivary.
[ "the volatile sobs secondo.", "if the fact that the barnacle is salivary is not false the dracaena is a hornblende." ]
[ "The barnacle is salivary.", "The barnacle is salivary if the sobs secondo are volatile." ]
The barnacle is salivary.
the volatile sobs secondo.
the dracaena is not a hornblende.
sent1: if the fact that the barnacle is salivary is not false the dracaena is a hornblende. sent2: if the volatile sobs secondo the barnacle is salivary. sent3: The secondo sobs volatile. sent4: the volatile sobs secondo.
¬{C}{c}
sent1: {B}{b} -> {C}{c} sent2: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} sent3: {AA}{aa} sent4: {A}{a}
[ "sent2 & sent4 -> int1: that the barnacle is salivary is true.; sent1 & int1 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
[ "sent2 & sent4 -> int1: {B}{b}; sent1 & int1 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
2
2
1
0
1
null
null
null
[]
null
null
$hypothesis$ = the dracaena is not a hornblende. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the barnacle is salivary is not false the dracaena is a hornblende. sent2: if the volatile sobs secondo the barnacle is salivary. sent3: The secondo sobs volatile. sent4: the volatile sobs secondo. ; $proof$ =
sent2 & sent4 -> int1: that the barnacle is salivary is true.; sent1 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
DeductionInstance
if the volatile sobs secondo the barnacle is salivary.
[ "the volatile sobs secondo.", "if the fact that the barnacle is salivary is not false the dracaena is a hornblende." ]
[ "The barnacle is salivary.", "The barnacle is salivary if the sobs secondo are volatile." ]
The barnacle is salivary if the sobs secondo are volatile.
if the fact that the barnacle is salivary is not false the dracaena is a hornblende.
the fusil does not carbonate domicile.
sent1: the boxfish is axonal. sent2: the racquetball is axonal if there is something such that that it is both unseasonable and not an age is not true. sent3: the boxfish is an ebony if it is axonal. sent4: if that something is an ebony but it does not carbonate domicile is not right then it does carbonate domicile. sent5: the fusil does not drink maidenliness if the boxfish is an ebony. sent6: something is axonal if the fact that it is an ebony hold. sent7: everything is either an abrasive or clad or both. sent8: if something does not carbonate domicile then it is an ebony and it is unseasonable. sent9: if the racquetball is axonal then the boxfish does carbonate domicile. sent10: if the transportation is an abrasive then it is plural. sent11: the fusil is unseasonable. sent12: the boxfish carbonates domicile. sent13: if there is something such that it is a kind of a plural then the fact that the chopsteak is both unseasonable and not an age is wrong. sent14: if the fact that something is not plural but it is an age is not right it does not carbonate domicile. sent15: if something is a kind of an ebony then it is unseasonable. sent16: if something is clad it is a plural.
¬{D}{b}
sent1: {A}{a} sent2: (x): ¬({C}x & ¬{E}x) -> {A}{c} sent3: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} sent4: (x): ¬({B}x & ¬{D}x) -> {D}x sent5: {B}{a} -> ¬{IL}{b} sent6: (x): {B}x -> {A}x sent7: (x): ({H}x v {G}x) sent8: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({B}x & {C}x) sent9: {A}{c} -> {D}{a} sent10: {H}{e} -> {F}{e} sent11: {C}{b} sent12: {D}{a} sent13: (x): {F}x -> ¬({C}{d} & ¬{E}{d}) sent14: (x): ¬(¬{F}x & {E}x) -> ¬{D}x sent15: (x): {B}x -> {C}x sent16: (x): {G}x -> {F}x
[ "sent3 & sent1 -> int1: the boxfish is a kind of an ebony.; sent15 -> int2: the boxfish is unseasonable if it is an ebony.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the boxfish is unseasonable.;" ]
UNKNOWN
[ "sent3 & sent1 -> int1: {B}{a}; sent15 -> int2: {B}{a} -> {C}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: {C}{a};" ]
UNKNOWN
3
null
13
0
13
the fusil carbonates domicile.
{D}{b}
10
[ "sent4 -> int4: if that the fusil is a kind of an ebony and does not carbonate domicile is not correct then it does carbonate domicile.; sent7 -> int5: either the transportation is an abrasive or it is clad or both.; sent16 -> int6: if the transportation is clad it is a kind of a plural.; int5 & sent10 & int6 -> int7: the transportation is a plural.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it is a plural.; int8 & sent13 -> int9: the fact that the chopsteak is unseasonable but it is not an age is not right.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that that that it is a kind of unseasonable thing that is not an age is not wrong is not correct.; int10 & sent2 -> int11: that the racquetball is axonal is not incorrect.; sent9 & int11 -> int12: the boxfish does carbonate domicile.; int12 -> int13: something does carbonate domicile.;" ]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the fusil does not carbonate domicile. ; $context$ = sent1: the boxfish is axonal. sent2: the racquetball is axonal if there is something such that that it is both unseasonable and not an age is not true. sent3: the boxfish is an ebony if it is axonal. sent4: if that something is an ebony but it does not carbonate domicile is not right then it does carbonate domicile. sent5: the fusil does not drink maidenliness if the boxfish is an ebony. sent6: something is axonal if the fact that it is an ebony hold. sent7: everything is either an abrasive or clad or both. sent8: if something does not carbonate domicile then it is an ebony and it is unseasonable. sent9: if the racquetball is axonal then the boxfish does carbonate domicile. sent10: if the transportation is an abrasive then it is plural. sent11: the fusil is unseasonable. sent12: the boxfish carbonates domicile. sent13: if there is something such that it is a kind of a plural then the fact that the chopsteak is both unseasonable and not an age is wrong. sent14: if the fact that something is not plural but it is an age is not right it does not carbonate domicile. sent15: if something is a kind of an ebony then it is unseasonable. sent16: if something is clad it is a plural. ; $proof$ =
__UNKNOWN__
DeductionInstance
the boxfish is an ebony if it is axonal.
[ "the boxfish is axonal.", "if something is a kind of an ebony then it is unseasonable." ]
[ "The boxfish is an axonal.", "If the boxfish is axonal, it is an ebony." ]
The boxfish is an axonal.
the boxfish is axonal.
the fusil does not carbonate domicile.
sent1: the boxfish is axonal. sent2: the racquetball is axonal if there is something such that that it is both unseasonable and not an age is not true. sent3: the boxfish is an ebony if it is axonal. sent4: if that something is an ebony but it does not carbonate domicile is not right then it does carbonate domicile. sent5: the fusil does not drink maidenliness if the boxfish is an ebony. sent6: something is axonal if the fact that it is an ebony hold. sent7: everything is either an abrasive or clad or both. sent8: if something does not carbonate domicile then it is an ebony and it is unseasonable. sent9: if the racquetball is axonal then the boxfish does carbonate domicile. sent10: if the transportation is an abrasive then it is plural. sent11: the fusil is unseasonable. sent12: the boxfish carbonates domicile. sent13: if there is something such that it is a kind of a plural then the fact that the chopsteak is both unseasonable and not an age is wrong. sent14: if the fact that something is not plural but it is an age is not right it does not carbonate domicile. sent15: if something is a kind of an ebony then it is unseasonable. sent16: if something is clad it is a plural.
¬{D}{b}
sent1: {A}{a} sent2: (x): ¬({C}x & ¬{E}x) -> {A}{c} sent3: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} sent4: (x): ¬({B}x & ¬{D}x) -> {D}x sent5: {B}{a} -> ¬{IL}{b} sent6: (x): {B}x -> {A}x sent7: (x): ({H}x v {G}x) sent8: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({B}x & {C}x) sent9: {A}{c} -> {D}{a} sent10: {H}{e} -> {F}{e} sent11: {C}{b} sent12: {D}{a} sent13: (x): {F}x -> ¬({C}{d} & ¬{E}{d}) sent14: (x): ¬(¬{F}x & {E}x) -> ¬{D}x sent15: (x): {B}x -> {C}x sent16: (x): {G}x -> {F}x
[ "sent3 & sent1 -> int1: the boxfish is a kind of an ebony.; sent15 -> int2: the boxfish is unseasonable if it is an ebony.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the boxfish is unseasonable.;" ]
UNKNOWN
[ "sent3 & sent1 -> int1: {B}{a}; sent15 -> int2: {B}{a} -> {C}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: {C}{a};" ]
UNKNOWN
3
null
13
0
13
the fusil carbonates domicile.
{D}{b}
10
[ "sent4 -> int4: if that the fusil is a kind of an ebony and does not carbonate domicile is not correct then it does carbonate domicile.; sent7 -> int5: either the transportation is an abrasive or it is clad or both.; sent16 -> int6: if the transportation is clad it is a kind of a plural.; int5 & sent10 & int6 -> int7: the transportation is a plural.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it is a plural.; int8 & sent13 -> int9: the fact that the chopsteak is unseasonable but it is not an age is not right.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that that that it is a kind of unseasonable thing that is not an age is not wrong is not correct.; int10 & sent2 -> int11: that the racquetball is axonal is not incorrect.; sent9 & int11 -> int12: the boxfish does carbonate domicile.; int12 -> int13: something does carbonate domicile.;" ]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the fusil does not carbonate domicile. ; $context$ = sent1: the boxfish is axonal. sent2: the racquetball is axonal if there is something such that that it is both unseasonable and not an age is not true. sent3: the boxfish is an ebony if it is axonal. sent4: if that something is an ebony but it does not carbonate domicile is not right then it does carbonate domicile. sent5: the fusil does not drink maidenliness if the boxfish is an ebony. sent6: something is axonal if the fact that it is an ebony hold. sent7: everything is either an abrasive or clad or both. sent8: if something does not carbonate domicile then it is an ebony and it is unseasonable. sent9: if the racquetball is axonal then the boxfish does carbonate domicile. sent10: if the transportation is an abrasive then it is plural. sent11: the fusil is unseasonable. sent12: the boxfish carbonates domicile. sent13: if there is something such that it is a kind of a plural then the fact that the chopsteak is both unseasonable and not an age is wrong. sent14: if the fact that something is not plural but it is an age is not right it does not carbonate domicile. sent15: if something is a kind of an ebony then it is unseasonable. sent16: if something is clad it is a plural. ; $proof$ =
__UNKNOWN__
DeductionInstance
the boxfish is an ebony if it is axonal.
[ "the boxfish is axonal.", "if something is a kind of an ebony then it is unseasonable." ]
[ "The boxfish is an axonal.", "If the boxfish is axonal, it is an ebony." ]
If the boxfish is axonal, it is an ebony.
if something is a kind of an ebony then it is unseasonable.
the costmary does not drink rhizopod.
sent1: the calliandra is Darwinian. sent2: that the costmary does drink walloper and/or it does drink rhizopod hold. sent3: if that the backwater is not gynecological hold the accuser is heedless but it does not drink rhizopod. sent4: the costmary does not drink rhizopod if the accuser is a kind of heedless thing that does not drink rhizopod. sent5: if the fact that the calliandra is heedless hold then the costmary does drink rhizopod. sent6: if the calliandra does drink rhizopod the costmary is gynecological. sent7: everything is a rogation or it does fancy or both. sent8: the Norvasc is gynecological. sent9: something does whore if it is not atomic. sent10: the costmary is heedless if the calliandra drinks rhizopod. sent11: if something is not gynecological that it is not a penitent and not heedless is incorrect. sent12: the costmary drinks rhizopod if the calliandra is gynecological. sent13: if the costmary is heedless the fact that the calliandra is not non-gynecological is right. sent14: everything is heedless or it is gynecological or both. sent15: something that either does whore or is Jain or both is not gynecological. sent16: either the calliandra is a Coleridge or it is gynecological or both. sent17: that the costmary is gynecological and/or it does drink rhizopod hold. sent18: if the costmary is heedless the calliandra does drink rhizopod. sent19: if the calliandra is gynecological then the costmary is heedless. sent20: the supercomputer is a Goldberg.
¬{C}{a}
sent1: {CS}{aa} sent2: ({AS}{a} v {C}{a}) sent3: ¬{B}{c} -> ({A}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) sent4: ({A}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) -> ¬{C}{a} sent5: {A}{aa} -> {C}{a} sent6: {C}{aa} -> {B}{a} sent7: (x): ({JH}x v {BA}x) sent8: {B}{id} sent9: (x): ¬{F}x -> {D}x sent10: {C}{aa} -> {A}{a} sent11: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬(¬{IM}x & ¬{A}x) sent12: {B}{aa} -> {C}{a} sent13: {A}{a} -> {B}{aa} sent14: (x): ({A}x v {B}x) sent15: (x): ({D}x v {E}x) -> ¬{B}x sent16: ({HM}{aa} v {B}{aa}) sent17: ({B}{a} v {C}{a}) sent18: {A}{a} -> {C}{aa} sent19: {B}{aa} -> {A}{a} sent20: {H}{d}
[ "sent14 -> int1: the calliandra is heedless and/or it is gynecological.; int1 & sent5 & sent12 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
[ "sent14 -> int1: ({A}{aa} v {B}{aa}); int1 & sent5 & sent12 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
2
2
17
0
17
everything either is penitent or does blaspheme or both.
(x): ({IM}x v {JB}x)
7
[ "sent11 -> int2: the fact that the accuser is a kind of non-penitent thing that is not heedless does not hold if it is not gynecological.;" ]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the costmary does not drink rhizopod. ; $context$ = sent1: the calliandra is Darwinian. sent2: that the costmary does drink walloper and/or it does drink rhizopod hold. sent3: if that the backwater is not gynecological hold the accuser is heedless but it does not drink rhizopod. sent4: the costmary does not drink rhizopod if the accuser is a kind of heedless thing that does not drink rhizopod. sent5: if the fact that the calliandra is heedless hold then the costmary does drink rhizopod. sent6: if the calliandra does drink rhizopod the costmary is gynecological. sent7: everything is a rogation or it does fancy or both. sent8: the Norvasc is gynecological. sent9: something does whore if it is not atomic. sent10: the costmary is heedless if the calliandra drinks rhizopod. sent11: if something is not gynecological that it is not a penitent and not heedless is incorrect. sent12: the costmary drinks rhizopod if the calliandra is gynecological. sent13: if the costmary is heedless the fact that the calliandra is not non-gynecological is right. sent14: everything is heedless or it is gynecological or both. sent15: something that either does whore or is Jain or both is not gynecological. sent16: either the calliandra is a Coleridge or it is gynecological or both. sent17: that the costmary is gynecological and/or it does drink rhizopod hold. sent18: if the costmary is heedless the calliandra does drink rhizopod. sent19: if the calliandra is gynecological then the costmary is heedless. sent20: the supercomputer is a Goldberg. ; $proof$ =
sent14 -> int1: the calliandra is heedless and/or it is gynecological.; int1 & sent5 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
DeductionInstance
everything is heedless or it is gynecological or both.
[ "if the fact that the calliandra is heedless hold then the costmary does drink rhizopod.", "the costmary drinks rhizopod if the calliandra is gynecological." ]
[ "Whatever it is, everything is heedless.", "Everything is heedless or both." ]
Whatever it is, everything is heedless.
if the fact that the calliandra is heedless hold then the costmary does drink rhizopod.
the costmary does not drink rhizopod.
sent1: the calliandra is Darwinian. sent2: that the costmary does drink walloper and/or it does drink rhizopod hold. sent3: if that the backwater is not gynecological hold the accuser is heedless but it does not drink rhizopod. sent4: the costmary does not drink rhizopod if the accuser is a kind of heedless thing that does not drink rhizopod. sent5: if the fact that the calliandra is heedless hold then the costmary does drink rhizopod. sent6: if the calliandra does drink rhizopod the costmary is gynecological. sent7: everything is a rogation or it does fancy or both. sent8: the Norvasc is gynecological. sent9: something does whore if it is not atomic. sent10: the costmary is heedless if the calliandra drinks rhizopod. sent11: if something is not gynecological that it is not a penitent and not heedless is incorrect. sent12: the costmary drinks rhizopod if the calliandra is gynecological. sent13: if the costmary is heedless the fact that the calliandra is not non-gynecological is right. sent14: everything is heedless or it is gynecological or both. sent15: something that either does whore or is Jain or both is not gynecological. sent16: either the calliandra is a Coleridge or it is gynecological or both. sent17: that the costmary is gynecological and/or it does drink rhizopod hold. sent18: if the costmary is heedless the calliandra does drink rhizopod. sent19: if the calliandra is gynecological then the costmary is heedless. sent20: the supercomputer is a Goldberg.
¬{C}{a}
sent1: {CS}{aa} sent2: ({AS}{a} v {C}{a}) sent3: ¬{B}{c} -> ({A}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) sent4: ({A}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) -> ¬{C}{a} sent5: {A}{aa} -> {C}{a} sent6: {C}{aa} -> {B}{a} sent7: (x): ({JH}x v {BA}x) sent8: {B}{id} sent9: (x): ¬{F}x -> {D}x sent10: {C}{aa} -> {A}{a} sent11: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬(¬{IM}x & ¬{A}x) sent12: {B}{aa} -> {C}{a} sent13: {A}{a} -> {B}{aa} sent14: (x): ({A}x v {B}x) sent15: (x): ({D}x v {E}x) -> ¬{B}x sent16: ({HM}{aa} v {B}{aa}) sent17: ({B}{a} v {C}{a}) sent18: {A}{a} -> {C}{aa} sent19: {B}{aa} -> {A}{a} sent20: {H}{d}
[ "sent14 -> int1: the calliandra is heedless and/or it is gynecological.; int1 & sent5 & sent12 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
[ "sent14 -> int1: ({A}{aa} v {B}{aa}); int1 & sent5 & sent12 -> hypothesis;" ]
DISPROVED
2
2
17
0
17
everything either is penitent or does blaspheme or both.
(x): ({IM}x v {JB}x)
7
[ "sent11 -> int2: the fact that the accuser is a kind of non-penitent thing that is not heedless does not hold if it is not gynecological.;" ]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the costmary does not drink rhizopod. ; $context$ = sent1: the calliandra is Darwinian. sent2: that the costmary does drink walloper and/or it does drink rhizopod hold. sent3: if that the backwater is not gynecological hold the accuser is heedless but it does not drink rhizopod. sent4: the costmary does not drink rhizopod if the accuser is a kind of heedless thing that does not drink rhizopod. sent5: if the fact that the calliandra is heedless hold then the costmary does drink rhizopod. sent6: if the calliandra does drink rhizopod the costmary is gynecological. sent7: everything is a rogation or it does fancy or both. sent8: the Norvasc is gynecological. sent9: something does whore if it is not atomic. sent10: the costmary is heedless if the calliandra drinks rhizopod. sent11: if something is not gynecological that it is not a penitent and not heedless is incorrect. sent12: the costmary drinks rhizopod if the calliandra is gynecological. sent13: if the costmary is heedless the fact that the calliandra is not non-gynecological is right. sent14: everything is heedless or it is gynecological or both. sent15: something that either does whore or is Jain or both is not gynecological. sent16: either the calliandra is a Coleridge or it is gynecological or both. sent17: that the costmary is gynecological and/or it does drink rhizopod hold. sent18: if the costmary is heedless the calliandra does drink rhizopod. sent19: if the calliandra is gynecological then the costmary is heedless. sent20: the supercomputer is a Goldberg. ; $proof$ =
sent14 -> int1: the calliandra is heedless and/or it is gynecological.; int1 & sent5 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__
DeductionInstance
everything is heedless or it is gynecological or both.
[ "if the fact that the calliandra is heedless hold then the costmary does drink rhizopod.", "the costmary drinks rhizopod if the calliandra is gynecological." ]
[ "Whatever it is, everything is heedless.", "Everything is heedless or both." ]
Everything is heedless or both.
the costmary drinks rhizopod if the calliandra is gynecological.
the anthracite is not a chord.
sent1: the bunt is not a Phasmidae if the anthracite is a sesquipedality and it is a chord. sent2: if the fact that the soursop is not a hypocellularity hold the bunt is a kind of a Parr. sent3: that something is not a kind of a sesquipedality and it is not a Phasmidae if it is a kind of a Parr is true. sent4: if the bunt is a sesquipedality and it is a Phasmidae then the fact that the anthracite is not a kind of a chord hold. sent5: if something is not a right then it is not a hypocellularity and/or it is not independent. sent6: the bunt does chord. sent7: something does chord if the fact that it is a kind of a sesquipedality is right. sent8: if something is not a copout that it rights and it is non-tabular is wrong. sent9: if that the phenolphthalein is not a copout and is not a Hylidae does not hold then the enamel is not a copout. sent10: if something is not a hypocellularity or dependent or both then the fact that it is not a hypocellularity is not incorrect. sent11: the anthracite is a autofluorescence. sent12: the soursop is not a right if that the enamel is a right but it is not tabular does not hold. sent13: that something is not a copout and it is not a Hylidae is not right if it is not a crate. sent14: if the bunt is both not a sesquipedality and not a Phasmidae then the anthracite is a chord. sent15: the bunt is a kind of a Phasmidae. sent16: the bunt is a sesquipedality. sent17: the anthracite is not a sesquipedality if the bunt does chord and it is a kind of a Phasmidae.
¬{C}{b}
sent1: ({A}{b} & {C}{b}) -> ¬{B}{a} sent2: ¬{E}{c} -> {D}{a} sent3: (x): {D}x -> (¬{A}x & ¬{B}x) sent4: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{C}{b} sent5: (x): ¬{F}x -> (¬{E}x v ¬{G}x) sent6: {C}{a} sent7: (x): {A}x -> {C}x sent8: (x): ¬{H}x -> ¬({F}x & ¬{I}x) sent9: ¬(¬{H}{e} & ¬{K}{e}) -> ¬{H}{d} sent10: (x): (¬{E}x v ¬{G}x) -> ¬{E}x sent11: {EG}{b} sent12: ¬({F}{d} & ¬{I}{d}) -> ¬{F}{c} sent13: (x): ¬{J}x -> ¬(¬{H}x & ¬{K}x) sent14: (¬{A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> {C}{b} sent15: {B}{a} sent16: {A}{a} sent17: ({C}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{A}{b}
[ "sent16 & sent15 -> int1: the bunt is a sesquipedality and a Phasmidae.; sent4 & int1 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
[ "sent16 & sent15 -> int1: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}); sent4 & int1 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
2
2
14
0
14
the anthracite does chord.
{C}{b}
10
[ "sent3 -> int2: the bunt is not a sesquipedality and it is not a Phasmidae if it is a kind of a Parr.; sent10 -> int3: the soursop is not a hypocellularity if it either is not a hypocellularity or is not independent or both.; sent5 -> int4: if the fact that the soursop is not right is right then it is not a hypocellularity and/or it is not independent.; sent8 -> int5: if the enamel is not a copout the fact that it is a right and is not tabular is not true.; sent13 -> int6: the fact that the phenolphthalein is not a kind of a copout and it is not a Hylidae does not hold if it is not a kind of a crate.;" ]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the anthracite is not a chord. ; $context$ = sent1: the bunt is not a Phasmidae if the anthracite is a sesquipedality and it is a chord. sent2: if the fact that the soursop is not a hypocellularity hold the bunt is a kind of a Parr. sent3: that something is not a kind of a sesquipedality and it is not a Phasmidae if it is a kind of a Parr is true. sent4: if the bunt is a sesquipedality and it is a Phasmidae then the fact that the anthracite is not a kind of a chord hold. sent5: if something is not a right then it is not a hypocellularity and/or it is not independent. sent6: the bunt does chord. sent7: something does chord if the fact that it is a kind of a sesquipedality is right. sent8: if something is not a copout that it rights and it is non-tabular is wrong. sent9: if that the phenolphthalein is not a copout and is not a Hylidae does not hold then the enamel is not a copout. sent10: if something is not a hypocellularity or dependent or both then the fact that it is not a hypocellularity is not incorrect. sent11: the anthracite is a autofluorescence. sent12: the soursop is not a right if that the enamel is a right but it is not tabular does not hold. sent13: that something is not a copout and it is not a Hylidae is not right if it is not a crate. sent14: if the bunt is both not a sesquipedality and not a Phasmidae then the anthracite is a chord. sent15: the bunt is a kind of a Phasmidae. sent16: the bunt is a sesquipedality. sent17: the anthracite is not a sesquipedality if the bunt does chord and it is a kind of a Phasmidae. ; $proof$ =
sent16 & sent15 -> int1: the bunt is a sesquipedality and a Phasmidae.; sent4 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
DeductionInstance
the bunt is a sesquipedality.
[ "the bunt is a kind of a Phasmidae.", "if the bunt is a sesquipedality and it is a Phasmidae then the fact that the anthracite is not a kind of a chord hold." ]
[ "It's a sesquipedality.", "It is a sesquipedality." ]
It's a sesquipedality.
the bunt is a kind of a Phasmidae.
the anthracite is not a chord.
sent1: the bunt is not a Phasmidae if the anthracite is a sesquipedality and it is a chord. sent2: if the fact that the soursop is not a hypocellularity hold the bunt is a kind of a Parr. sent3: that something is not a kind of a sesquipedality and it is not a Phasmidae if it is a kind of a Parr is true. sent4: if the bunt is a sesquipedality and it is a Phasmidae then the fact that the anthracite is not a kind of a chord hold. sent5: if something is not a right then it is not a hypocellularity and/or it is not independent. sent6: the bunt does chord. sent7: something does chord if the fact that it is a kind of a sesquipedality is right. sent8: if something is not a copout that it rights and it is non-tabular is wrong. sent9: if that the phenolphthalein is not a copout and is not a Hylidae does not hold then the enamel is not a copout. sent10: if something is not a hypocellularity or dependent or both then the fact that it is not a hypocellularity is not incorrect. sent11: the anthracite is a autofluorescence. sent12: the soursop is not a right if that the enamel is a right but it is not tabular does not hold. sent13: that something is not a copout and it is not a Hylidae is not right if it is not a crate. sent14: if the bunt is both not a sesquipedality and not a Phasmidae then the anthracite is a chord. sent15: the bunt is a kind of a Phasmidae. sent16: the bunt is a sesquipedality. sent17: the anthracite is not a sesquipedality if the bunt does chord and it is a kind of a Phasmidae.
¬{C}{b}
sent1: ({A}{b} & {C}{b}) -> ¬{B}{a} sent2: ¬{E}{c} -> {D}{a} sent3: (x): {D}x -> (¬{A}x & ¬{B}x) sent4: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{C}{b} sent5: (x): ¬{F}x -> (¬{E}x v ¬{G}x) sent6: {C}{a} sent7: (x): {A}x -> {C}x sent8: (x): ¬{H}x -> ¬({F}x & ¬{I}x) sent9: ¬(¬{H}{e} & ¬{K}{e}) -> ¬{H}{d} sent10: (x): (¬{E}x v ¬{G}x) -> ¬{E}x sent11: {EG}{b} sent12: ¬({F}{d} & ¬{I}{d}) -> ¬{F}{c} sent13: (x): ¬{J}x -> ¬(¬{H}x & ¬{K}x) sent14: (¬{A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> {C}{b} sent15: {B}{a} sent16: {A}{a} sent17: ({C}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{A}{b}
[ "sent16 & sent15 -> int1: the bunt is a sesquipedality and a Phasmidae.; sent4 & int1 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
[ "sent16 & sent15 -> int1: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}); sent4 & int1 -> hypothesis;" ]
PROVED
2
2
14
0
14
the anthracite does chord.
{C}{b}
10
[ "sent3 -> int2: the bunt is not a sesquipedality and it is not a Phasmidae if it is a kind of a Parr.; sent10 -> int3: the soursop is not a hypocellularity if it either is not a hypocellularity or is not independent or both.; sent5 -> int4: if the fact that the soursop is not right is right then it is not a hypocellularity and/or it is not independent.; sent8 -> int5: if the enamel is not a copout the fact that it is a right and is not tabular is not true.; sent13 -> int6: the fact that the phenolphthalein is not a kind of a copout and it is not a Hylidae does not hold if it is not a kind of a crate.;" ]
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
$hypothesis$ = the anthracite is not a chord. ; $context$ = sent1: the bunt is not a Phasmidae if the anthracite is a sesquipedality and it is a chord. sent2: if the fact that the soursop is not a hypocellularity hold the bunt is a kind of a Parr. sent3: that something is not a kind of a sesquipedality and it is not a Phasmidae if it is a kind of a Parr is true. sent4: if the bunt is a sesquipedality and it is a Phasmidae then the fact that the anthracite is not a kind of a chord hold. sent5: if something is not a right then it is not a hypocellularity and/or it is not independent. sent6: the bunt does chord. sent7: something does chord if the fact that it is a kind of a sesquipedality is right. sent8: if something is not a copout that it rights and it is non-tabular is wrong. sent9: if that the phenolphthalein is not a copout and is not a Hylidae does not hold then the enamel is not a copout. sent10: if something is not a hypocellularity or dependent or both then the fact that it is not a hypocellularity is not incorrect. sent11: the anthracite is a autofluorescence. sent12: the soursop is not a right if that the enamel is a right but it is not tabular does not hold. sent13: that something is not a copout and it is not a Hylidae is not right if it is not a crate. sent14: if the bunt is both not a sesquipedality and not a Phasmidae then the anthracite is a chord. sent15: the bunt is a kind of a Phasmidae. sent16: the bunt is a sesquipedality. sent17: the anthracite is not a sesquipedality if the bunt does chord and it is a kind of a Phasmidae. ; $proof$ =
sent16 & sent15 -> int1: the bunt is a sesquipedality and a Phasmidae.; sent4 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__
DeductionInstance
the bunt is a sesquipedality.
[ "the bunt is a kind of a Phasmidae.", "if the bunt is a sesquipedality and it is a Phasmidae then the fact that the anthracite is not a kind of a chord hold." ]
[ "It's a sesquipedality.", "It is a sesquipedality." ]
It is a sesquipedality.
if the bunt is a sesquipedality and it is a Phasmidae then the fact that the anthracite is not a kind of a chord hold.