post_href
stringlengths 57
213
| python_solutions
stringlengths 71
22.3k
| slug
stringlengths 3
77
| post_title
stringlengths 1
100
| user
stringlengths 3
29
| upvotes
int64 -20
1.2k
| views
int64 0
60.9k
| problem_title
stringlengths 3
77
| number
int64 1
2.48k
| acceptance
float64 0.14
0.91
| difficulty
stringclasses 3
values | __index_level_0__
int64 0
34k
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://leetcode.com/problems/words-within-two-edits-of-dictionary/discuss/2756737/Simple-and-Clean-python-code | class Solution:
def twoEditWords(self, queries: List[str], dictionary: List[str]) -> List[str]:
def fut(a,b):
ret = 0
for i in range(len(a)):
if a[i] != b[i]: ret += 1
return ret
res = []
for q in queries:
for d in dictionary:
if fut(q,d) <= 2:
res.append(q)
break
return res | words-within-two-edits-of-dictionary | Simple and Clean python code | w7Pratham | 0 | 9 | words within two edits of dictionary | 2,452 | 0.603 | Medium | 33,600 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/words-within-two-edits-of-dictionary/discuss/2756735/Python-Solution | class Solution:
def twoEditWords(self, queries: List[str], dictionary: List[str]) -> List[str]:
ans = []
s = set()
def isequal(a,b,x):
c = 0
i = 0
n = len(a)
while i < n:
if a[i] != b[i]:
c += 1
i += 1
if c <= 2 and x not in s:
ans.append(a)
s.add(x)
return
for i in range(len(queries)):
for j in range(len(dictionary)):
isequal(queries[i],dictionary[j],i)
return ans | words-within-two-edits-of-dictionary | Python Solution | a_dityamishra | 0 | 7 | words within two edits of dictionary | 2,452 | 0.603 | Medium | 33,601 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/words-within-two-edits-of-dictionary/discuss/2756715/Python3-Brute-Force-Solution | class Solution:
def twoEditWords(self, queries: List[str], dictionary: List[str]) -> List[str]:
res = []
for word0 in queries:
for word1 in dictionary:
diff = 0
for t in range(len(word0)):
if word0[t] != word1[t]:
diff += 1
if diff <= 2:
res.append(word0)
break
return res | words-within-two-edits-of-dictionary | Python3 Brute Force Solution | xxHRxx | 0 | 4 | words within two edits of dictionary | 2,452 | 0.603 | Medium | 33,602 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/words-within-two-edits-of-dictionary/discuss/2756662/Python3-set-of-all-acceptable-words | class Solution:
def twoEditWords(self, queries: List[str], dictionary: List[str]) -> List[str]:
d=set(dictionary)
for w in dictionary:
for i in range(len(w)):
w1=w[:i]+'*'+w[i+1:]
d.add(w1)
for j in range(i,len(w)):
w2=w1[:j]+'*'+w1[j+1:]
d.add(w2)
answ=[]
for w in queries:
br=0
if w in d:
answ.append(w)
continue
for i in range(len(w)):
if br: break
w1=w[:i]+'*'+w[i+1:]
if w1 in d:
answ.append(w)
break
for j in range(i,len(w)):
w2=w1[:j]+'*'+w1[j+1:]
if w2 in d:
answ.append(w)
br=1
break
return answ | words-within-two-edits-of-dictionary | Python3, set of all acceptable words | Silvia42 | 0 | 3 | words within two edits of dictionary | 2,452 | 0.603 | Medium | 33,603 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/words-within-two-edits-of-dictionary/discuss/2756646/PythonStraight-forward-code | class Solution:
def twoEditWords(self, queries: List[str], dictionary: List[str]) -> List[str]:
output = []
count = 0
for word_queries in queries:
for word_dictionary in dictionary:
count = 0
for i in range(len(word_queries)):
if word_queries[i] != word_dictionary[i]:
count += 1
if count<=2:
output.append(word_queries)
break
return output | words-within-two-edits-of-dictionary | 【Python】Straight forward code ✅ | gordonkwok | 0 | 8 | words within two edits of dictionary | 2,452 | 0.603 | Medium | 33,604 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/words-within-two-edits-of-dictionary/discuss/2756522/Python-Easy-to-Understand-With-Explanation | class Solution:
def twoEditWords(self, queries: List[str], dictionary: List[str]) -> List[str]:
def count(s, t):
ans = 0
for i in range(len(s)):
if s[i] != t[i]:
ans += 1
if ans > 2:
return False
return True
ans = []
for word in queries:
for d in dictionary:
if count(word, d):
ans.append(word)
break
return ans | words-within-two-edits-of-dictionary | [Python] Easy to Understand With Explanation | neil_teng | 0 | 15 | words within two edits of dictionary | 2,452 | 0.603 | Medium | 33,605 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/words-within-two-edits-of-dictionary/discuss/2756513/Python3-or-Brute-Force | class Solution:
def twoEditWords(self, queries: List[str], dictionary: List[str]) -> List[str]:
n,m=len(queries),len(dictionary)
ans=[]
for q in queries:
for d in dictionary:
cnt=0
i=0
while i<len(q):
if q[i]!=d[i]:
cnt+=1
i+=1
if cnt<=2:
ans.append(q)
break
return ans | words-within-two-edits-of-dictionary | [Python3] | Brute Force | swapnilsingh421 | 0 | 7 | words within two edits of dictionary | 2,452 | 0.603 | Medium | 33,606 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/words-within-two-edits-of-dictionary/discuss/2756457/Python-or-Easy-or | class Solution:
def twoEditWords(self, queries: List[str], dictionary: List[str]) -> List[str]:
n = len(queries[0])
ans = []
for i in range(len(queries)):
for j in range(len(dictionary)):
count = 0
for k in range(n):
if(dictionary[j][k] != queries[i][k]):
count += 1
if(count > 2):
break
if(count <= 2):
ans.append(queries[i])
break
return ans | words-within-two-edits-of-dictionary | Python | Easy | | LittleMonster23 | 0 | 24 | words within two edits of dictionary | 2,452 | 0.603 | Medium | 33,607 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/destroy-sequential-targets/discuss/2756374/Python-or-Greedy-or-Group-or-Example | class Solution:
def destroyTargets(self, nums: List[int], space: int) -> int:
# example: nums = [3,7,8,1,1,5], space = 2
groups = defaultdict(list)
for num in nums:
groups[num % space].append(num)
# print(groups) # defaultdict(<class 'list'>, {1: [3, 7, 1, 1, 5], 0: [8]}) groups is [3, 7, 1, 1, 5] and [8]
""" min of [3, 7, 1, 1, 5] can destroy all others (greedy approach) => 1 can destory 1,3,5,7 ... """
performance = defaultdict(list)
for group in groups.values():
performance[len(group)].append(min(group))
# print(performance) # defaultdict(<class 'list'>, {5: [1], 1: [8]})
# nums that can destory 5 targets are [1], nums that can destory 1 target are [8]
return min(performance[max(performance)]) | destroy-sequential-targets | Python | Greedy | Group | Example | yzhao156 | 3 | 122 | destroy sequential targets | 2,453 | 0.373 | Medium | 33,608 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/destroy-sequential-targets/discuss/2794087/Python-(Simple-Maths) | class Solution:
def destroyTargets(self, nums, space):
dict1 = defaultdict(int)
for i in nums:
dict1[i%space] += 1
max_val = max(dict1.values())
return min([i for i in nums if dict1[i%space] == max_val]) | destroy-sequential-targets | Python (Simple Maths) | rnotappl | 1 | 5 | destroy sequential targets | 2,453 | 0.373 | Medium | 33,609 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/destroy-sequential-targets/discuss/2844702/Python3-Commented-and-Concise-Solution-Modulo-and-HashMap | class Solution:
def destroyTargets(self, nums: List[int], space: int) -> int:
# get a dict of modulos
modulo_dict = dict()
# go through the array and compute the modulo and their counter
for idx, num in enumerate(nums):
# compute the modulo
modi = num % space
# check whether we need to create one
if modi in modulo_dict:
# keep track of the smalles number
modulo_dict[modi][0] = min(num, modulo_dict[modi][0])
# keep track of the count of this specific modulo
modulo_dict[modi][1] += 1
else:
# create this modulo
modulo_dict[modi] = [num, 1]
# go through the dict and element with the highest modulo count
best_ele = max(modulo_dict.values(), key=lambda x: (x[1], -x[0]))
# return the good element
return best_ele[0] | destroy-sequential-targets | [Python3] - Commented and Concise Solution - Modulo and HashMap | Lucew | 0 | 1 | destroy sequential targets | 2,453 | 0.373 | Medium | 33,610 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/destroy-sequential-targets/discuss/2766934/One-pass-no-sorting-59-speed | class Solution:
def destroyTargets(self, nums: List[int], space: int) -> int:
d = dict()
for n in nums:
rem = n % space
if rem in d:
if n < d[rem][1]:
d[rem][1] = n
d[rem][0] -= 1
else:
d[rem] = [-1, n]
return min(d.values())[1] | destroy-sequential-targets | One pass, no sorting, 59% speed | EvgenySH | 0 | 6 | destroy sequential targets | 2,453 | 0.373 | Medium | 33,611 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/destroy-sequential-targets/discuss/2760145/Python-or-Three-Lines-or-Mod-Counter-wexplanation | class Solution:
def destroyTargets(self, xs: List[int], space: int) -> int:
class_freqs = Counter(x % space for x in xs)
max_count = max (class_freqs.values())
return min(x for x in xs if class_freqs [x % space] == max_count) | destroy-sequential-targets | Python | Three Lines | Mod Counter w/explanation | on_danse_encore_on_rit_encore | 0 | 11 | destroy sequential targets | 2,453 | 0.373 | Medium | 33,612 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/destroy-sequential-targets/discuss/2757190/Python3-modulo | class Solution:
def destroyTargets(self, nums: List[int], space: int) -> int:
freq = Counter()
mp = defaultdict(lambda : inf)
for x in nums:
k = x % space
freq[k] += 1
mp[k] = min(mp[k], x)
m = max(freq.values())
return min(mp[k] for k, v in freq.items() if v == m) | destroy-sequential-targets | [Python3] modulo | ye15 | 0 | 9 | destroy sequential targets | 2,453 | 0.373 | Medium | 33,613 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/destroy-sequential-targets/discuss/2756967/Python-Answer-Group-Numbers-by-Modulo-Space-into-Dict | class Solution:
def destroyTargets(self, nums: List[int], space: int) -> int:
#1,3,5,7,9,...
#3, 5, 7, 9
#8, 10,
#nums = [3,7,8,1,1,5], space = 2
groups = defaultdict(int)
val = defaultdict(list)
for n in nums:
groups[n%space] += 1
val[n%space].append(n)
n = max(groups.values())
m = float('inf')
for v in val:
if len(val[v]) == n:
m = min(m, min(val[v]))
return m | destroy-sequential-targets | [Python Answer🤫🐍🐍🐍] Group Numbers by Modulo Space into Dict | xmky | 0 | 9 | destroy sequential targets | 2,453 | 0.373 | Medium | 33,614 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/destroy-sequential-targets/discuss/2756811/Python3-Easy-Remainder-Solution-O(N) | class Solution:
def destroyTargets(self, nums: List[int], space: int) -> int:
nums.sort()
dicts = defaultdict(int)
for element in nums:
dicts[element % space] += 1
target = max(dicts.values())
for element in nums:
if dicts[element % space] == target:
return element | destroy-sequential-targets | Python3 Easy Remainder Solution O(N) | xxHRxx | 0 | 4 | destroy sequential targets | 2,453 | 0.373 | Medium | 33,615 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/destroy-sequential-targets/discuss/2756559/Group-nums-by-mod-space | class Solution:
def destroyTargets(self, nums: List[int], space: int) -> int:
numsByMod = defaultdict(list)
for num in nums:
numsByMod[num % space].append(num)
maxLength = 0
for group in numsByMod.values():
if maxLength < len(group):
maxLength = len(group)
maxDestroyer = min(group)
elif maxLength == len(group):
maxDestroyer = min(maxDestroyer, min(group))
return maxDestroyer | destroy-sequential-targets | Group nums by mod space | sr_vrd | 0 | 7 | destroy sequential targets | 2,453 | 0.373 | Medium | 33,616 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/destroy-sequential-targets/discuss/2756511/Python-3-oror-Time%3A-1539-ms-Space%3A-34-MB | class Solution:
def destroyTargets(self, nums: List[int], space: int) -> int:
n=len(nums)
t=[0 for i in range(n)]
for i in range(len(nums)):
t[i]=nums[i]%space
z=Counter(t)
t1=0
for i in z:
t1=max(z[i],t1)
ans=float('inf')
for i in range(n):
if(z[t[i]]==t1):
ans=min(ans,nums[i])
return ans | destroy-sequential-targets | Python 3 || Time: 1539 ms , Space: 34 MB | koder_786 | 0 | 9 | destroy sequential targets | 2,453 | 0.373 | Medium | 33,617 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/destroy-sequential-targets/discuss/2756460/Python3-or-Modulus-%2B-Hashmap | class Solution:
def destroyTargets(self, nums: List[int], space: int) -> int:
hmap=defaultdict(list)
for i in nums:
if i%space in hmap:
occ,val=hmap[i%space]
hmap[i%space]=[occ+1,min(val,i)]
else:
hmap[i%space]=[1,i]
value=-float('inf')
ans=-1
for i,j in hmap.items():
if j[0]>value:
value=j[0]
ans=j[1]
if j[0]==value:
ans=min(ans,j[1])
return ans | destroy-sequential-targets | [Python3] | Modulus + Hashmap | swapnilsingh421 | 0 | 9 | destroy sequential targets | 2,453 | 0.373 | Medium | 33,618 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/next-greater-element-iv/discuss/2757259/Python3-intermediate-stack | class Solution:
def secondGreaterElement(self, nums: List[int]) -> List[int]:
ans = [-1] * len(nums)
s, ss = [], []
for i, x in enumerate(nums):
while ss and nums[ss[-1]] < x: ans[ss.pop()] = x
buff = []
while s and nums[s[-1]] < x: buff.append(s.pop())
while buff: ss.append(buff.pop())
s.append(i)
return ans | next-greater-element-iv | [Python3] intermediate stack | ye15 | 1 | 38 | next greater element iv | 2,454 | 0.396 | Hard | 33,619 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/next-greater-element-iv/discuss/2757157/O(n-log-n)-Python-sorted-list-solution | class Solution:
def secondGreaterElement(self, nums: List[int]) -> List[int]:
from sortedcontainers import SortedList as slist
l=len(nums)
ans=[-1]*l
print(ans)
lst=slist([(nums[0], 0, [])], key=lambda x:(x[0], x[1]))
i=1
while i<l:
tmp=nums[i]
j=0
while j<len(lst) and lst[j][0]<tmp:
lst[j][2].append(nums[i])
if len(lst[j][2])>=2:
ans[lst[j][1]]=lst[j][2][1]
lst.discard(lst[j])
else:
j+=1
lst.add((nums[i], i, []))
i+=1
return ans | next-greater-element-iv | O(n log n) Python sorted list solution | mbeceanu | 0 | 11 | next greater element iv | 2,454 | 0.396 | Hard | 33,620 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/next-greater-element-iv/discuss/2757122/Python-3Heap-%2B-Monotonic-queue-(hint-solution) | class Solution:
def secondGreaterElement(self, nums: List[int]) -> List[int]:
n = len(nums)
first, second = [], []
ans = [-1] * n
for i in range(n):
# check if current greater than candidates waiting for second greater element
while second and nums[i] > second[0][0]:
val, idx = heappop(second)
ans[idx] = nums[i]
# check if current greater than candidates waiting for first greater element
while first and nums[i] > nums[first[-1]]:
tmp = first.pop()
# push into candidates waiting for second greater element
# min-heap with smallest value on top
heappush(second, (nums[tmp], tmp))
first.append(i)
return ans | next-greater-element-iv | [Python 3]Heap + Monotonic queue (hint solution) | chestnut890123 | 0 | 20 | next greater element iv | 2,454 | 0.396 | Hard | 33,621 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/next-greater-element-iv/discuss/2756483/Python3-or-Stack-%2B-Priority-Queue | class Solution:
def secondGreaterElement(self, nums: List[int]) -> List[int]:
st1,st2=[],[]
heapify(st2)
ans=[-1 for i in range(len(nums))]
for i in range(len(nums)):
while st2 and nums[-st2[0]]<nums[i]:
ans[-heappop(st2)]=nums[i]
while st1 and nums[st1[-1]]<nums[i]:
heappush(st2,-st1.pop())
st1.append(i)
return ans | next-greater-element-iv | [Python3] | Stack + Priority Queue | swapnilsingh421 | 0 | 57 | next greater element iv | 2,454 | 0.396 | Hard | 33,622 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three/discuss/2770799/Easy-Python-Solution | class Solution:
def averageValue(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
l=[]
for i in nums:
if i%6==0:
l.append(i)
return sum(l)//len(l) if len(l)>0 else 0 | average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three | Easy Python Solution | Vistrit | 2 | 107 | average value of even numbers that are divisible by three | 2,455 | 0.58 | Easy | 33,623 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three/discuss/2764545/Python-Simple-Python-Solution | class Solution:
def averageValue(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
s=0
k=0
for i in nums:
if i%6==0:
k+=1
s+=i
if k==0:
return 0
else:
return(s//k) | average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three | [ Python ]🐍🐍Simple Python Solution ✅✅ | sourav638 | 2 | 17 | average value of even numbers that are divisible by three | 2,455 | 0.58 | Easy | 33,624 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three/discuss/2780425/Python-one-pass-O(n) | class Solution:
def averageValue(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
_ans =[]
for i in nums:
if (i%2==0) and (i%3==0):
_ans.append(i)
return sum(_ans)//len(_ans) if len(_ans) > 0 else 0 | average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three | Python one pass O(n) | ATHBuys | 1 | 18 | average value of even numbers that are divisible by three | 2,455 | 0.58 | Easy | 33,625 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three/discuss/2763059/Easiest-Python-Solution-oror-With-Explanation | class Solution:
def averageValue(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
ans=0 # ans will store the sum of elements which are even and divisible by 3;
cnt=0 # cnt will store the number of elements which are even and divisible by 3;
for ele in nums:
# Elements which are divisible by 3 and are even simply means **It must be divisible by 6** So we are checking that in the loop
# we are adding it to ans if it is divisible by 6 and increase cnt by 1;
if (ele%6==0):
ans+=ele;
cnt+=1;
if (cnt==0):
return 0; # if no element is found return 0;
return (floor(ans/cnt)); # else return the floor value ofaverage that is sum of elements divided by no. of elements | average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three | Easiest Python Solution || With Explanation ✔ | akanksha984 | 1 | 75 | average value of even numbers that are divisible by three | 2,455 | 0.58 | Easy | 33,626 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three/discuss/2828543/4-line-Python-solution | class Solution:
def averageValue(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
valid_nums = [num for num in nums if num % 3 == 0 and num % 2 == 0]
if len(valid_nums) == 0:
return 0
return int(sum(valid_nums)/len(valid_nums)) | average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three | 4 line Python solution | lornedot | 0 | 2 | average value of even numbers that are divisible by three | 2,455 | 0.58 | Easy | 33,627 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three/discuss/2820623/python-O(n)-beats-66 | class Solution: ##
def averageValue(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
## Time Complexity == O(n)
lst = [i for i in nums if i%2 == 0 and i%3 ==0]
return sum(lst) // len(lst) if lst else 0 | average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three | python O(n) beats 66% | syedsajjad62 | 0 | 2 | average value of even numbers that are divisible by three | 2,455 | 0.58 | Easy | 33,628 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three/discuss/2820592/Python-3-Simple-code | class Solution:
def averageValue(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
res = 0
count = 0
for i in nums:
# Even number that is divisible by 3
# Same conditions as divisible by 6
if i % 6 == 0:
res += i
count += 1
if count != 0:
res = res // count
return res | average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three | [Python 3] Simple code | nguyentangnhathuy | 0 | 1 | average value of even numbers that are divisible by three | 2,455 | 0.58 | Easy | 33,629 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three/discuss/2795381/Easy-approach | class Solution:
def averageValue(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
l=[]
for i in nums:
if i%6==0:
l.append(i)
if(len(l)>0):
return sum(l)//len(l)
else:
return 0 | average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three | Easy approach | nishithakonuganti | 0 | 2 | average value of even numbers that are divisible by three | 2,455 | 0.58 | Easy | 33,630 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three/discuss/2795283/Python-Easy-Solution-Time%3A-0(n)-Space%3A-0(1) | class Solution:
def averageValue(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
s = 0
c = 0
for i, v in enumerate(nums):
if v % 2 == 0 and v % 3 == 0:
s += v
c += 1
return math.floor(s / c) if c != 0 else 0 | average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three | Python Easy Solution Time: 0(n) Space: 0(1) | ben-tiki | 0 | 4 | average value of even numbers that are divisible by three | 2,455 | 0.58 | Easy | 33,631 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three/discuss/2783199/2455.-Average-Value-of-Even-Numbers-That-Are-Divisible-by-Three | class Solution:
def averageValue(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
add=0
lst=[]
for i in range(len(nums)):
if(nums[i]%3==0 and nums[i]%2==0):
lst.append(nums[i])
x=len(lst)
if(x==0):
return 0
for i in range(x):
add+=lst[i]
return add//x | average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three | 2455. Average Value of Even Numbers That Are Divisible by Three | knock_knock47 | 0 | 2 | average value of even numbers that are divisible by three | 2,455 | 0.58 | Easy | 33,632 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three/discuss/2779971/Simple-Python-Solution | class Solution:
def averageValue(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
list2 = []
for i in nums:
if i%2 == 0:
if i%3 == 0:
list2.append(i)
b = len(list2)
sum1 = 0
if b>0:
for i in list2:
sum1 = sum1 + i
else:
return 0
c = sum1//b
return c | average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three | Simple Python Solution | dnvavinash | 0 | 5 | average value of even numbers that are divisible by three | 2,455 | 0.58 | Easy | 33,633 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three/discuss/2774622/Python-Simple-and-Crisp-Solution! | class Solution:
def averageValue(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
total = 0
count = 0
for x in nums:
if x % 2 == 0 and x % 3 == 0:
total += x
count += 1
if count == 0:
return 0
return total // count | average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three | Python Simple and Crisp Solution! | vedanthvbaliga | 0 | 2 | average value of even numbers that are divisible by three | 2,455 | 0.58 | Easy | 33,634 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three/discuss/2770560/Python | class Solution:
def averageValue(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
list1 = [x for x in nums if x%6 == 0]
if (len(list1) > 0):
return sum(list1)//len(list1)
else:
return 0 | average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three | Python | user1079z | 0 | 3 | average value of even numbers that are divisible by three | 2,455 | 0.58 | Easy | 33,635 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three/discuss/2766941/easy-way-in-python | class Solution:
def averageValue(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
s=0
count=0
for i in nums:
if i%2==0 and i%3==0:
print(i)
s=s+i
count=count+1
if count==0:
return 0
else:
return s//count | average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three | easy way in python | sindhu_300 | 0 | 13 | average value of even numbers that are divisible by three | 2,455 | 0.58 | Easy | 33,636 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three/discuss/2764757/Python-Easy-Understanding-Solution | class Solution:
def averageValue(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
n = 0
total = 0
for val in nums:
if val % 6 == 0 and val != 0:
n += 1
total += val
return int(total/n) if n else 0 | average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three | Python Easy Understanding Solution | MaverickEyedea | 0 | 3 | average value of even numbers that are divisible by three | 2,455 | 0.58 | Easy | 33,637 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three/discuss/2761942/One-pass | class Solution:
def averageValue(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
sum_nums = count = 0
for n in nums:
if not n % 6:
sum_nums += n
count += 1
return sum_nums // count if count > 0 else 0 | average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three | One pass | EvgenySH | 0 | 5 | average value of even numbers that are divisible by three | 2,455 | 0.58 | Easy | 33,638 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three/discuss/2761930/Easy-FIlter-Solution | class Solution:
def averageValue(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
filt =[i for i in nums if i % 6 == 0]
return sum(filt) // len(filt) if len(filt) else 0 | average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three | Easy FIlter Solution | cyber_kazakh | 0 | 7 | average value of even numbers that are divisible by three | 2,455 | 0.58 | Easy | 33,639 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three/discuss/2761255/Python3-oror-Easy-oror-O(N) | class Solution:
def averageValue(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
sumo = 0
count = 0
for i in range(len(nums)):
if nums[i] % 6 == 0:
sumo += nums[i]
count += 1
return 0 if (count == 0) else sumo//count | average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three | Python3 || Easy || O(N) | akshdeeprr | 0 | 6 | average value of even numbers that are divisible by three | 2,455 | 0.58 | Easy | 33,640 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three/discuss/2759518/python-O(n) | class Solution:
def averageValue(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
temp_sum = 0
no = 0
for i in nums:
if i % 3 == 0 and i % 2 == 0:
temp_sum += i
no += 1
if no == 0:
return 0
else:
return temp_sum//no | average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three | python O(n) | akashp2001 | 0 | 5 | average value of even numbers that are divisible by three | 2,455 | 0.58 | Easy | 33,641 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three/discuss/2759225/Python-Simple-Python-Solution | class Solution:
def averageValue(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
result = 0
current_sum = 0
count = 0
for num in nums:
if num % 2 == 0 and num % 3 == 0:
current_sum = current_sum + num
count = count + 1
if count == 0:
return 0
else:
result = current_sum // count
return result | average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three | [ Python ] ✅✅ Simple Python Solution 🥳✌👍 | ASHOK_KUMAR_MEGHVANSHI | 0 | 11 | average value of even numbers that are divisible by three | 2,455 | 0.58 | Easy | 33,642 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three/discuss/2758828/Python%2BNumPy | class Solution:
def averageValue(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
import numpy as np
nums = [x for x in nums if x%6==0]
return int(np.average(nums)) if nums else 0 | average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three | Python+NumPy | Leox2022 | 0 | 3 | average value of even numbers that are divisible by three | 2,455 | 0.58 | Easy | 33,643 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three/discuss/2758699/Python-or-Three-lines | class Solution:
def averageValue(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
xs = [m for m in nums if m % 6 == 0]
n = len(xs)
return 0 if n == 0 else sum(xs) // n | average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three | Python | Three lines | on_danse_encore_on_rit_encore | 0 | 11 | average value of even numbers that are divisible by three | 2,455 | 0.58 | Easy | 33,644 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three/discuss/2758436/Python | class Solution:
def averageValue(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
s = c = 0
for n in nums:
if n % 6 == 0:
s += n
c += 1
return s // c if c else 0 | average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three | Python | blue_sky5 | 0 | 7 | average value of even numbers that are divisible by three | 2,455 | 0.58 | Easy | 33,645 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three/discuss/2758382/Python-Solution(Brute-force-and-Optimal-approach) | class Solution:
def averageValue(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
# Brute Force Approach, T.C = O(N), S.C = O(N)
# N = len(nums)
# ans = []
# for i in range(N):
# if nums[i] % 2 == 0 and nums[i] % 3 == 0:
# ans.append(nums[i])
# if len(ans) == 0:
# return 0
# else:
# return sum(ans)//len(ans)
# Optimal Approach, T.C = O(N), S.C = O(1)
N = len(nums)
ans = 0
count = 0
for i in range(N):
if nums[i] % 2 == 0 and nums[i] % 3 == 0:
ans += nums[i]
count += 1
if ans == 0:
return 0
else:
return ans//count | average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three | Python Solution(Brute force and Optimal approach) | Ayush_Kumar27 | 0 | 6 | average value of even numbers that are divisible by three | 2,455 | 0.58 | Easy | 33,646 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three/discuss/2758362/Python3-Simple-2-lines | class Solution:
def averageValue(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
q=[x for x in nums if not x%6]
return q and sum(q)//len(q) or 0 | average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three | Python3, Simple 2 lines | Silvia42 | 0 | 8 | average value of even numbers that are divisible by three | 2,455 | 0.58 | Easy | 33,647 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three/discuss/2758275/Python-Answer-Modulo | class Solution:
def averageValue(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
res = []
for n in nums:
if n % 3 == 0 and n % 2 == 0:
res.append(n)
return floor(sum(res) / len(res)) if len(res) > 0 else 0 | average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three | [Python Answer🤫🐍🐍🐍] Modulo | xmky | 0 | 4 | average value of even numbers that are divisible by three | 2,455 | 0.58 | Easy | 33,648 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three/discuss/2758257/Python-Solution | class Solution:
def averageValue(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
# Brute Force Approach, T.C = O(N), S.C = O(N)
# N = len(nums)
# ans = []
# for i in range(N):
# if nums[i] % 2 == 0 and nums[i] % 3 == 0:
# ans.append(nums[i])
# if len(ans) == 0:
# return 0
# else:
# return sum(ans)//len(ans)
# Optimal Approach, T.C = O(N), S.C = O(1)
N = len(nums)
ans = 0
count = 0
for i in range(N):
if nums[i] % 2 == 0 and nums[i] % 3 == 0:
ans += nums[i]
count += 1
if ans == 0:
return 0
else:
return ans//count | average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three | Python Solution | Ayush_Kumar27 | 0 | 4 | average value of even numbers that are divisible by three | 2,455 | 0.58 | Easy | 33,649 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three/discuss/2758181/Python-Easy-Solution-with-explanation | class Solution:
def averageValue(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
'''
Algorithm:
1.declare total variable to hold the sum of all even numbers divisible by 3
2. declare a count variable to hold the number of the even numbers divisible by 3
3. loop over the array
4. check if the number is even and divisible by 3
5. if yes update sum and number variables
6. when the loop ends, return total/count which is average
Time Complexity O(N)
Space Complexity O(1)
'''
total = 0
count = 0
for i in nums:
if i%2 == 0 and i%3 == 0:
total += i
count += 1
try:
return int(total/count)
except:
return 0 | average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three | Python Easy Solution with explanation | dee7 | 0 | 10 | average value of even numbers that are divisible by three | 2,455 | 0.58 | Easy | 33,650 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three/discuss/2758180/Python3-or-Implementation | class Solution:
def averageValue(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
cnt=0
curr=0
for i in nums:
if i%2==0 and i%3==0:
curr+=i
cnt+=1
if cnt==0:
return 0
return curr//cnt | average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three | [Python3] | Implementation | swapnilsingh421 | 0 | 6 | average value of even numbers that are divisible by three | 2,455 | 0.58 | Easy | 33,651 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three/discuss/2758105/Python3-divisible-by-6 | class Solution:
def averageValue(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
cnt = total = 0
for x in nums:
if x % 6 == 0:
cnt += 1
total += x
return cnt and total//cnt | average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three | [Python3] divisible by 6 | ye15 | 0 | 11 | average value of even numbers that are divisible by three | 2,455 | 0.58 | Easy | 33,652 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three/discuss/2758056/easy-python-solutionororeasy-to-understand | class Solution:
def averageValue(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
tot = 0
count=0
for ele in nums:
if ele%2==0:
if ele%3==0:
tot+=ele
count+=1
if count==0:
return 0
else:
return tot//count | average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three | ✅✅easy python solution||easy to understand | chessman_1 | 0 | 2 | average value of even numbers that are divisible by three | 2,455 | 0.58 | Easy | 33,653 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three/discuss/2758050/PythonStraight-forward-code | class Solution:
def averageValue(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
sum = 0
divisor = 0
for num in nums:
if num%2==0 and num%3==0:
sum+=num
divisor+=1
if divisor == 0:
return 0
return int(sum/divisor) | average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three | 【Python】Straight forward code ✅ | gordonkwok | 0 | 11 | average value of even numbers that are divisible by three | 2,455 | 0.58 | Easy | 33,654 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three/discuss/2757986/python | class Solution:
def averageValue(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
sum, count = 0,0
for n in nums:
if n % 3 == 0 and n % 2 == 0:
sum += n
count += 1
if count == 0: return 0
return int(sum/count) | average-value-of-even-numbers-that-are-divisible-by-three | python | pradyumna04 | 0 | 5 | average value of even numbers that are divisible by three | 2,455 | 0.58 | Easy | 33,655 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/most-popular-video-creator/discuss/2758104/Python-Hashmap-solution-or-No-Sorting | class Solution:
def mostPopularCreator(self, creators: List[str], ids: List[str], views: List[int]) -> List[List[str]]:
memo = {}
#tracking the max popular video count
overall_max_popular_video_count = -1
#looping over the creators
for i in range(len(creators)):
if creators[i] in memo:
#Step 1: update number of views for the creator
memo[creators[i]][0] += views[i]
#Step 2: update current_popular_video_view and id_of_most_popular_video_so_far
if memo[creators[i]][2] < views[i]:
memo[creators[i]][1] = ids[i]
memo[creators[i]][2] = views[i]
#Step 2a: finding the lexicographically smallest id as we hit the current_popularity_video_view again!
elif memo[creators[i]][2] == views[i]:
memo[creators[i]][1] = min(memo[creators[i]][1],ids[i])
else:
#adding new entry to our memo
#new entry is of the format memo[creator[i]] = [total number current views for the creator, store the lexicographic id of the popular video, current popular view of the creator]
memo[creators[i]] = [views[i],ids[i],views[i]]
#track the max popular video count
overall_max_popular_video_count = max(memo[creators[i]][0],overall_max_popular_video_count)
result = []
for i in memo:
if memo[i][0] == overall_max_popular_video_count:
result.append([i,memo[i][1]])
return result | most-popular-video-creator | Python Hashmap solution | No Sorting | dee7 | 5 | 330 | most popular video creator | 2,456 | 0.441 | Medium | 33,656 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/most-popular-video-creator/discuss/2758289/Python-Answer-Heap-%2B-Dict-solution | class Solution:
def mostPopularCreator(self, creators: List[str], ids: List[str], views: List[int]) -> List[List[str]]:
pop = defaultdict(int)
pop_small = defaultdict(list)
for i,creator in enumerate(creators):
pop[creator] += views[i]
heappush(pop_small[creator], [-views[i],ids[i]])
m = max(pop.values())
res = []
for creator in pop:
if pop[creator] == m:
res.append([creator, pop_small[creator][0][1]])
return res | most-popular-video-creator | [Python Answer🤫🐍🐍🐍] Heap + Dict solution | xmky | 1 | 43 | most popular video creator | 2,456 | 0.441 | Medium | 33,657 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/most-popular-video-creator/discuss/2842036/Python3-Linear-Hashmap-with-multiple-elements | class Solution:
def mostPopularCreator(self, creators: List[str], ids: List[str], views: List[int]) -> List[List[str]]:
# make a dict to save the viwer count and the highest view count
counter = collections.defaultdict(lambda: [0, "", -1])
# go through the content creators
for creator, idd, view in zip(creators, ids, views):
# get the list with informations
infos = counter[creator]
# increase the view
infos[0] += view
# check if the video is the most viewed
if view > infos[2] or (view == infos[2] and infos[1] > idd):
infos[2] = view
infos[1] = idd
# go through the creators and keep the highes
result = []
max_count = -1
for creator, infos in counter.items():
# check if we are higher or equal to current count
if max_count <= infos[0]:
# check if we are higher than current max
if max_count < infos[0]:
# clear the list
result.clear()
# update the max count
max_count = infos[0]
# append our current content creator
result.append([creator, infos[1]])
return result | most-popular-video-creator | [Python3] - Linear Hashmap with multiple elements | Lucew | 0 | 1 | most popular video creator | 2,456 | 0.441 | Medium | 33,658 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/most-popular-video-creator/discuss/2841104/python-dictionary-beats-96-of-answers | class Solution:
def mostPopularCreator(self, creators: List[str], ids: List[str], views: List[int]) -> List[List[str]]:
"""
summary : each creator will get to be a key in a dictionary that contains
the 1st item the sum of all the views so far
the 2nd the id(in case if the value of max seen is the same the smallest one lexicographically)
the 3rd item the maxviews so far
when we have all this data we look for the biggest sum and append the name of the creator and the id
to the ans list
"""
data = {}
for creator, id , view in zip(creators, ids, views):
if creator in data:
data[creator][0] += view
if view>data[creator][2]:
data[creator][2] = view
data[creator][1] = id
continue
if view==data[creator][2] and id< data[creator][1]:
data[creator][1] = id
continue
else:
data[creator] = [view,id,view]
maxView = 0
ans = []
for k,v in data.items():
if v[0]>maxView:
ans =[]
maxView =v[0]
if v[0]==maxView:
ans.append([k,v[1]])
return ans | most-popular-video-creator | python dictionary beats 96% of answers | rojanrookhosh | 0 | 1 | most popular video creator | 2,456 | 0.441 | Medium | 33,659 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/most-popular-video-creator/discuss/2824294/Simple-efficient-and-fast-Hashing-in-Python | class Solution:
def mostPopularCreator(self, creators: List[str], ids: List[str], views: List[int]) -> List[List[str]]:
d = {}
max_views = 0
for creator, view, id in zip(creators, views, ids):
# views, max viewed, id
if creator not in d:
d[creator] = [0, view, id]
elif view == d[creator][1]:
d[creator][2] = id if id < d[creator][2] else d[creator][2]
elif view > d[creator][1]:
d[creator][1] = view
d[creator][2] = id
d[creator][0] += view
if d[creator][0] > max_views:
max_views = d[creator][0]
res = []
for k, v in d.items():
if v[0] == max_views:
res.append([k, v[2]])
return res | most-popular-video-creator | Simple efficient and fast - Hashing in Python | cgtinker | 0 | 1 | most popular video creator | 2,456 | 0.441 | Medium | 33,660 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/most-popular-video-creator/discuss/2806466/Hasmap-Solution | class Solution:
def mostPopularCreator(self, creators: List[str], ids: List[str], views: List[int]) -> List[List[str]]:
d = defaultdict(int)
maxmap,mx = {},0
for c,i,v in zip(creators,ids,views):
d[c]+=v
mx = max(mx,d[c])
if c not in maxmap or maxmap[c][1]<v or (maxmap[c][1]==v and maxmap[c][0]>i):
maxmap[c] = [i,v]
ans = []
for i in maxmap:
if d[i]==mx:
ans.append([i,maxmap[i][0]])
return ans | most-popular-video-creator | Hasmap Solution | Rtriders | 0 | 2 | most popular video creator | 2,456 | 0.441 | Medium | 33,661 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/most-popular-video-creator/discuss/2779895/Python-O(n)-solution-using-dictionary | class Solution:
def mostPopularCreator(self, creators: List[str], ids: List[str], views: List[int]) -> List[List[str]]:
creators_set = set()
sum_map = defaultdict(int)
order_map = {}
n = len(views)
for i in range(n):
creators_set.add(creators[i])
sum_map[creators[i]]+=views[i]
if creators[i] not in order_map or views[i]>order_map[creators[i]][-1]:
order_map[creators[i]] = [ids[i], views[i]]
elif views[i]==order_map[creators[i]][-1] and ids[i]<order_map[creators[i]][0]:
order_map[creators[i]] = [ids[i], views[i]]
res = []
max_views = max(sum_map.values())
for creator in creators_set:
if sum_map[creator] == max_views:
res.append([creator, order_map[creator][0]])
return res | most-popular-video-creator | Python O(n) solution using dictionary | dhanu084 | 0 | 8 | most popular video creator | 2,456 | 0.441 | Medium | 33,662 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/most-popular-video-creator/discuss/2767144/Dictionary-for-creators-100-speed | class Solution:
def mostPopularCreator(self, creators: List[str], ids: List[str], views: List[int]) -> List[List[str]]:
d = dict()
for c, i, v in zip(creators, ids, views):
if c in d:
d[c][0] += v
if i in d[c][1]:
d[c][1][i] += v
else:
d[c][1][i] = v
else:
d[c] = [v, {i: v}]
popularity = 0
for lst in d.values():
popularity = max(popularity, lst[0])
ans = []
for c, lst in d.items():
if lst[0] == popularity:
ans_id = ""
ans_v = -1
for i, v in lst[1].items():
if v > ans_v:
ans_id = i
ans_v = v
elif v == ans_v:
ans_id = min(ans_id, i)
ans.append([c, ans_id])
return ans | most-popular-video-creator | Dictionary for creators, 100% speed | EvgenySH | 0 | 8 | most popular video creator | 2,456 | 0.441 | Medium | 33,663 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/most-popular-video-creator/discuss/2760646/straight-solution-with-python3-%2B-two-dict | class Solution:
def mostPopularCreator(self, creators, ids, views):# List[int]) -> List[List[str]]:
d = collections.defaultdict(dict)
c = collections.defaultdict(int)
res = list()
for i in range(len(creators)):
d[creators[i]][ids[i]] = views[i]
for i in range(len(creators)):
c[creators[i]] += views[i]
max_viewers= max(c.values())
max_creators = [k for k, v in c.items() if v == max_viewers]
for creator in max_creators:
t = [creator]
max_v = max(d[creator].values())
t.append(min([k for k, v in d[creator].items() if v == max_v]))
res.append(t)
return res | most-popular-video-creator | straight solution with python3 + two dict | kingfighters | 0 | 16 | most popular video creator | 2,456 | 0.441 | Medium | 33,664 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/most-popular-video-creator/discuss/2759539/easy-python-solutionororeasy-to-understand | class Solution:
def mostPopularCreator(self, creators: List[str], ids: List[str], views: List[int]) -> List[List[str]]:
d1 = {}
d2 = {}
s = ''
ans = []
for i in range(len(creators)):
if creators[i] not in d1:
d1[creators[i]] = [ids[i],views[i]]
else:
if views[i]>d1[creators[i]][1]:
d1[creators[i]] = [ids[i],views[i]]
elif views[i]==d1[creators[i]][1]:
s= min(ids[i],d1[creators[i]][0])
d1[creators[i]] = [s,views[i]]
for i in range(len(creators)):
if creators[i] not in d2:
d2[creators[i]]=views[i]
else:
d2[creators[i]]+=views[i]
l = list(d2.values())
maxviw = max(l)
for ele in d2:
if d2[ele]==maxviw:
ans.append([ele,d1[ele][0]])
return ans | most-popular-video-creator | ✅✅easy python solution||easy to understand | chessman_1 | 0 | 22 | most popular video creator | 2,456 | 0.441 | Medium | 33,665 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/most-popular-video-creator/discuss/2758959/Python-O(n)-by-dictionary-w-Comment | class Solution:
def mostPopularCreator(self, creators: List[str], ids: List[str], views: List[int]) -> List[List[str]]:
# Constant to help reader understand code
_ID, _View = 0, 1
# key: creator
# value: total view count
creatorView = defaultdict(int)
# key: creator
# value: best video with maximal view count, and lexical smallest video ID
creatorBestVid = defaultdict( lambda: ("Z_Dummy", -1) )
maxViewsOfCreator = -1
popCreators = set()
for creator, ID, view in zip( creators, ids, views):
# update total video view of current creator
creatorView[creator] += view
# update most popular creator
if( creatorView[creator] == maxViewsOfCreator):
popCreators.add(creator)
elif creatorView[creator] > maxViewsOfCreator:
popCreators.clear()
popCreators.add(creator)
# update maximal view among different creators
maxViewsOfCreator = max( maxViewsOfCreator, creatorView[creator])
# update best video for each creator
if view > creatorBestVid[creator][_View] or \
( view == creatorBestVid[creator][_View] and ID < creatorBestVid[creator][_ID] ):
creatorBestVid[creator] = (ID, view)
return [ [ star, creatorBestVid[star][_ID] ] for star in popCreators ] | most-popular-video-creator | Python O(n) by dictionary [w/ Comment] | brianchiang_tw | 0 | 21 | most popular video creator | 2,456 | 0.441 | Medium | 33,666 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/most-popular-video-creator/discuss/2758844/Python-3-Dictionaries-or-Easy-Implementation-or-Small | class Solution:
def mostPopularCreator(self, creators: List[str], ids: List[str], views: List[int]) -> List[List[str]]:
vi, v = defaultdict(int), defaultdict(list)
for i in range(len(ids)):
vi[creators[i]] += views[i]
v[creators[i]].append([ids[i], views[i]])
max_v = max(vi.values())
ans = []
for x in v:
if vi[x] == max_v:
p, y = v[x][0][0], v[x][0][1]
for i in range(len(v[x])):
if v[x][i][1] > y:
y = v[x][i][1]
p = v[x][i][0]
elif v[x][i][1] == y:
if v[x][i][0] < p: p= v[x][i][0]
ans.append([x, p])
return ans | most-popular-video-creator | [Python 3] Dictionaries | Easy Implementation | Small | Rajesh1809 | 0 | 14 | most popular video creator | 2,456 | 0.441 | Medium | 33,667 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/most-popular-video-creator/discuss/2758350/Python-O(n)-SpaceTime-Solution | class Solution:
def mostPopularCreator(self, creators: List[str], ids: List[str], views: List[int]) -> List[List[str]]:
max_total_views = 0
total_views = collections.defaultdict(int) # track each creator's total view count for all videos
most_viewed = {} # track each creator's most viewed video in the form of a tuple -> (video_view_count, video_id)
for i in range(len(creators)):
total_views[creators[i]] += views[i]
max_total_views = max(total_views[creators[i]], max_total_views)
# if current creator not seen before OR
# current video has more views than creator's previous most viewed video OR
# videos have equal views but id is lexicographically smaller
if (creators[i] not in most_viewed or
views[i] > most_viewed[creators[i]][0] or
(views[i] == most_viewed[creators[i]][0] and ids[i] < most_viewed[creators[i]][1])):
most_viewed[creators[i]] = (views[i], ids[i])
return [[creator, most_viewed[creator][1]] for creator, views in total_views.items() if views == max_total_views] | most-popular-video-creator | Python O(n) Space/Time Solution | whatdoyumin | 0 | 23 | most popular video creator | 2,456 | 0.441 | Medium | 33,668 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/most-popular-video-creator/discuss/2758338/Python3-Dictionary-and-Dictionary-of-Dictionary | class Solution:
def mostPopularCreator(self, creators: List[str], ids: List[str], views: List[int]) -> List[List[str]]:
autors={}
popularity={}
for a,i,v in zip(creators,ids,views):
if a not in autors:
autors[a]={}
popularity[a]=0
autors[a][i]=v
popularity[a]+=v
answ=[]
m=max(popularity.values())
for a,v in popularity.items():
if v==m:
val=autors[a].values()
k=max(val)
q=min(i for i,v in autors[a].items() if v==k)
answ.append([a,q])
return answ | most-popular-video-creator | Python3, Dictionary and Dictionary of Dictionary | Silvia42 | 0 | 11 | most popular video creator | 2,456 | 0.441 | Medium | 33,669 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/most-popular-video-creator/discuss/2758303/Simple-Python-O(n) | class Solution:
def mostPopularCreator(self, creators: List[str], ids: List[str], views: List[int]) -> List[List[str]]:
table = defaultdict(lambda: defaultdict(int))
for h, v, c in zip(creators, ids, views):
table[h]['_'] += c
table[h][v] = c
max_count = max(table[h]['_'] for h in table.keys())
res = []
for h in table.keys():
if table[h]['_'] == max_count:
pair = min([[-c, v] for v, c in table[h].items() if v != '_'])
res.append([h, pair[1]])
return res | most-popular-video-creator | Simple Python O(n) | ShuaSomeTea | 0 | 17 | most popular video creator | 2,456 | 0.441 | Medium | 33,670 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/most-popular-video-creator/discuss/2758198/Python-Clean-Python-Solution-or-Dictionary-Counter | class Solution:
def mostPopularCreator(self, creators: List[str], ids: List[str], views: List[int]) -> List[List[str]]:
creator_total_views = Counter()
d = collections.defaultdict(list)
max_views = 0
for i in range(len(creators)):
creator_total_views[creators[i]]+=views[i]
d[creators[i]].append((-views[i],ids[i]))
max_views = max(max_views,creator_total_views[creators[i]])
res = []
for creator,v in d.items():
if creator_total_views[creator] == max_views:
res.append([creator,min(v)[1]])
return res | most-popular-video-creator | [Python] Clean Python Solution | Dictionary, Counter | daftpnk | 0 | 26 | most popular video creator | 2,456 | 0.441 | Medium | 33,671 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/most-popular-video-creator/discuss/2758196/Python3-or-Hashmap-%2B-Sorting | class Solution:
def mostPopularCreator(self, creators: List[str], ids: List[str], views: List[int]) -> List[List[str]]:
hmap=defaultdict(list)
hmap_view=defaultdict(int)
n=len(ids)
for i in range(n):
hmap[creators[i]].append([ids[i],views[i]])
hmap_view[creators[i]]+=views[i]
c=[]
mx=max(hmap_view.values())
for i,j in hmap_view.items():
if j==mx:
c.append(i)
ans=[]
for cr in c:
tmp=[cr]
tmp.append(sorted(hmap[cr],key=lambda x:(-x[1],x[0]))[0][0])
ans.append(tmp)
return ans | most-popular-video-creator | [Python3] | Hashmap + Sorting | swapnilsingh421 | 0 | 16 | most popular video creator | 2,456 | 0.441 | Medium | 33,672 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/most-popular-video-creator/discuss/2758113/Python3-hash-table | class Solution:
def mostPopularCreator(self, creators: List[str], ids: List[str], views: List[int]) -> List[List[str]]:
mp = defaultdict(list)
total = defaultdict(int)
for c, i, v in zip(creators, ids, views):
mp[c].append((-v, i))
total[c] += v
ans = []
most = max(total.values())
for c, x in total.items():
if x == most: ans.append([c, min(mp[c])[1]])
return ans | most-popular-video-creator | [Python3] hash table | ye15 | 0 | 19 | most popular video creator | 2,456 | 0.441 | Medium | 33,673 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/most-popular-video-creator/discuss/2758083/Python3-or-Dictionary | class Solution:
def mostPopularCreator(self, creators: List[str], ids: List[str], views: List[int]) -> List[List[str]]:
has={}
for i in range(len(creators)):
if creators[i] in has:
has[creators[i]][0]+=views[i]
if has[creators[i]][2]<views[i]:
has[creators[i]][1]=ids[i]
has[creators[i]][2]=views[i]
elif has[creators[i]][2]==views[i]:
has[creators[i]][1]=min(ids[i],has[creators[i]][1])
else:
has[creators[i]]=[views[i],ids[i],views[i]]
ma=0
ans=[]
for i in has:
ma=max(has[i][0],ma)
for i in has:
if has[i][0]==ma:
ans.append([i,has[i][1]])
return ans | most-popular-video-creator | Python3 | Dictionary | RickSanchez101 | 0 | 33 | most popular video creator | 2,456 | 0.441 | Medium | 33,674 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/most-popular-video-creator/discuss/2758065/Python-solution-with-dict | class Solution:
def mostPopularCreator(self, creators: List[str], ids: List[str], views: List[int]) -> List[List[str]]:
m = {}
for i in range(len(creators)):
creator = creators[i]
view = views[i]
id = ids[i]
if creator not in m:
m[creator] = {"tview": view, "id": [id], "view": view}
else:
mcreator = m[creator]
mcreator["tview"] += view
if mcreator["view"] < view:
mcreator["id"] = [id]
mcreator["view"] = view
elif mcreator["view"] == view:
mcreator["id"].append(id)
hview = 0
c = []
for creator, cmap in m.items():
if cmap["tview"] > hview:
hview = cmap["tview"]
c = [creator]
elif cmap["tview"] == hview:
c.append(creator)
answer = []
for ans in c:
aids = m[ans]["id"]
aids.sort()
answer.append([ans, aids[0]])
return answer | most-popular-video-creator | Python solution with dict | pradyumna04 | 0 | 23 | most popular video creator | 2,456 | 0.441 | Medium | 33,675 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/most-popular-video-creator/discuss/2758047/Python-or-O(n) | class Solution:
def mostPopularCreator(self, creators: List[str], ids: List[str], views: List[int]) -> List[List[str]]:
total_views = {}
first_max_view = {}
for i in range(len(creators)):
total_views[creators[i]] = total_views.get(creators[i], 0)+views[i]
if creators[i] in first_max_view:
if views[i] > views[first_max_view[creators[i]]]: #update value with highest view id
first_max_view[creators[i]] = i
elif views[i] == views[first_max_view[creators[i]]]: #if views of some video are equal update with lexicographically smallest id.
if ids[i] < ids[first_max_view[creators[i]]]:
first_max_view[creators[i]] = i
else:
first_max_view[creators[i]] = i
max_views = max(total_views.values())
ans = []
for name in total_views:
if total_views[name] == max_views: #select most popular video creators
ans.append([name, ids[first_max_view[name]]])
return ans | most-popular-video-creator | Python | O(n) | diwakar_4 | -1 | 35 | most popular video creator | 2,456 | 0.441 | Medium | 33,676 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-addition-to-make-integer-beautiful/discuss/2758079/Check-next-10-next-100-next-1000-and-so-on... | class Solution:
def makeIntegerBeautiful(self, n: int, target: int) -> int:
i=n
l=1
while i<=10**12:
s=0
for j in str(i):
s+=int(j)
if s<=target:
return i-n
i//=10**l
i+=1
i*=10**l
l+=1 | minimum-addition-to-make-integer-beautiful | Check next 10, next 100, next 1000 and so on... | shreyasjain0912 | 2 | 97 | minimum addition to make integer beautiful | 2,457 | 0.368 | Medium | 33,677 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-addition-to-make-integer-beautiful/discuss/2844877/Python3-Next-multiple-of-Ten-Digit-Accumulation | class Solution:
def makeIntegerBeautiful(self, n: int, target: int) -> int:
# the sum of digits by addition only gets smaller if we
# get zeros certain digits by going to the next power
# of ten for that digit, which increases the previous
# digit by one
# lets get the digits of the number
digits = [int(ch) for ch in list(str(n))]
# compute the prefix sum for the digits
digits_acc = list(itertools.accumulate(digits))
# check the last sum to immediately break
if digits_acc[-1] <= target:
return 0
# go through the digits and check when we are lower than
# the target
found = False
for idx in range(len(digits)-1, -1, -1):
if digits_acc[idx] < target:
found = True
break
# now get the number
if found:
number = reduce(lambda x, y: x*10 + y, digits[:idx+1]) + 1
number *= 10**(len(digits)-idx-1)
else:
number = 10**(len(digits))
return number - n | minimum-addition-to-make-integer-beautiful | [Python3] - Next multiple of Ten - Digit Accumulation | Lucew | 0 | 1 | minimum addition to make integer beautiful | 2,457 | 0.368 | Medium | 33,678 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-addition-to-make-integer-beautiful/discuss/2776113/Easy-python-solution-with-good-comments | class Solution:
def makeIntegerBeautiful(self, n: int, target: int) -> int:
#function to get sum of the number
def getsum(n):
return sum([int(i) for i in str(n)])
#for the current digit place, if ones the 0, if tens then 1 as 10**1 =10
level=0
#storing ans
toadd=0
#calling function to get sum intially of n
sm=getsum(n)
#we need to loop till the sum is greater than target
#take example of 467
while(sm > target):
#pick the last digit
last = n%10
#last == 464%10 => 7
n+=(10-last)
#467+=(10-7) == 470
n=n//10
#n==470//10 =>47
toadd+=(10**level)*(10-last)
#toadd= (10**0)*(10-7)=>3
level+=1
#level is now 1, for next iteration since we modified n only we need to keep
#track of current digit place
sm = getsum(n)
#check the current sum again
return toadd | minimum-addition-to-make-integer-beautiful | Easy python solution with good comments | user9781TM | 0 | 9 | minimum addition to make integer beautiful | 2,457 | 0.368 | Medium | 33,679 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-addition-to-make-integer-beautiful/discuss/2766456/One-pass-over-digits-97-speed | class Solution:
def makeIntegerBeautiful(self, n: int, target: int) -> int:
lst_n = list(map(int, str(n)))
lst_n.reverse()
ans = []
i = 0
while sum(lst_n) > target:
if lst_n[i] > 0:
diff = 10 - lst_n[i]
ans.append(diff)
lst_n[i] = 0
if i + 1 < len(lst_n):
lst_n[i + 1] += 1
else:
lst_n.append(1)
else:
ans.append(0)
i += 1
if ans:
return sum(v * pow(10, i) for i, v in enumerate(ans))
return 0 | minimum-addition-to-make-integer-beautiful | One pass over digits, 97% speed | EvgenySH | 0 | 19 | minimum addition to make integer beautiful | 2,457 | 0.368 | Medium | 33,680 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-addition-to-make-integer-beautiful/discuss/2766161/Python-Easy-Intuitive-Explanation | class Solution:
def makeIntegerBeautiful(self, n: int, target: int) -> int:
def helper(x):
total = 0
while x > 0:
total += x % 10
x //= 10
return total
res = 0
base = 1
while helper(n + res) > target:
base = base * 10
res = base - (n % base)
return res | minimum-addition-to-make-integer-beautiful | Python Easy Intuitive Explanation | MaverickEyedea | 0 | 7 | minimum addition to make integer beautiful | 2,457 | 0.368 | Medium | 33,681 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-addition-to-make-integer-beautiful/discuss/2760295/Python3-Greedy-Algorithm | class Solution:
def makeIntegerBeautiful(self, n: int, target: int) -> int:
if sum([int(x) for x in str(n)]) <= target:
return 0
else:
arr = [int(x) for x in str(n)]
arr.insert(0, 0)
current = sum(arr)
while True:
for i in range(len(arr)-1, 0, -1):
if sum(arr) <= target:
return int(''.join([str(x) for x in arr])) - n
else:
if arr[i] != 0:
current -= arr[i]
current += 1
arr[i-1] += 1
start = i-1
while start >= 1:
if arr[start] == 10:
arr[start-1] += 1
arr[start] = 0
else: break
start -= 1
arr[i] = 0 | minimum-addition-to-make-integer-beautiful | Python3 Greedy Algorithm | xxHRxx | 0 | 9 | minimum addition to make integer beautiful | 2,457 | 0.368 | Medium | 33,682 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-addition-to-make-integer-beautiful/discuss/2758724/python3-Recursion-solution-for-reference | class Solution:
def countDigits(self, n):
c = 0
zdigit = 0
s = 0
while n:
digit = n%10
s += digit
n = n//10
c += 1
if digit and not zdigit:
z = 10**(c-1)
zdigit = (10*z-z*digit)
return zdigit, s
def makeIntegerBeautiful(self, n: int, target: int) -> int:
zdigit, sm = self.countDigits(n)
if sm <= target:
return 0
return zdigit + self.makeIntegerBeautiful(n+zdigit, target) | minimum-addition-to-make-integer-beautiful | [python3] Recursion solution for reference | vadhri_venkat | 0 | 12 | minimum addition to make integer beautiful | 2,457 | 0.368 | Medium | 33,683 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-addition-to-make-integer-beautiful/discuss/2758679/Prefix-sum-solution-O(n)-in-python-3 | class Solution:
def makeIntegerBeautiful(self, n: int, target: int) -> int:
if n<=target:
return 0
nsp = [int(k) for k in str(n)]
prefix_sum = [0]*len(nsp)
for i in range(len(nsp)):
if i == 0:
prefix_sum[i] = nsp[i]
else:
prefix_sum[i] = prefix_sum[i-1]+ nsp[i]
#Edge case
if prefix_sum[-1] <= target:
return 0
for pos in range(len(prefix_sum)):
if prefix_sum[pos]+1>target:
break
if pos == 0:
#example 209 vs 2, has to become 1000, so 1000-209 is the answer
res = int('1'+len(nsp)*'0') - n
else:
#example 109 vs 2, just need to become 110
res = int('1'+(len(nsp)-pos)*'0') - int(str(n)[pos:])
return res | minimum-addition-to-make-integer-beautiful | Prefix sum solution O(n) in python 3 | Arana | 0 | 4 | minimum addition to make integer beautiful | 2,457 | 0.368 | Medium | 33,684 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-addition-to-make-integer-beautiful/discuss/2758567/Simple-math | class Solution:
def makeIntegerBeautiful(self, n: int, target: int) -> int:
def sumofc(num):
s = 0
while num != 0:
s += num % 10
num = int(num/10)
return s
ans = 0
tmp = n
mult = 1
#keep making last digit zero till sum of digits is less than target
while sumofc(tmp) > target:
lastn = tmp % 10
tmp = int(tmp/10) + 1
#making first digit of our answer
ans = ans + mult * (10 - lastn)
multp = mult * 10
return ans | minimum-addition-to-make-integer-beautiful | Simple math | praneeth_357 | 0 | 12 | minimum addition to make integer beautiful | 2,457 | 0.368 | Medium | 33,685 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-addition-to-make-integer-beautiful/discuss/2758297/Python-Answer-Cheesed-solution | class Solution:
def makeIntegerBeautiful(self, n: int, target: int) -> int:
def getnum(num):
s = str(num)
total = 0
for c in s:
total += int(c)
return total
t= getnum(n)
st = str(n)
res = 0
index = len(st) - 1
rindex = 0
while t > target:
st = str(n)
extra = (10 - int(st[index]) ) * (10**rindex)
res += extra
index -= 1
rindex += 1
n += extra
t = getnum(n)
return res
return -1 | minimum-addition-to-make-integer-beautiful | [Python Answer🤫🐍🐍🐍] Cheesed solution | xmky | 0 | 7 | minimum addition to make integer beautiful | 2,457 | 0.368 | Medium | 33,686 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-addition-to-make-integer-beautiful/discuss/2758269/Python3-Simple-and-Quick | class Solution:
def makeIntegerBeautiful(self, n: int, target: int) -> int:
i,d=n,10
while 1:
if sum(int(ch) for ch in str(i)) <= target:
return i-n
i=(i//d)*d+d
d*=10 | minimum-addition-to-make-integer-beautiful | Python3, Simple and Quick | Silvia42 | 0 | 4 | minimum addition to make integer beautiful | 2,457 | 0.368 | Medium | 33,687 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-addition-to-make-integer-beautiful/discuss/2758246/Python-solution-using-strings | class Solution:
def makeIntegerBeautiful(self, n: int, target: int) -> int:
if sum([int(x) for x in str(n)]) <= target:
return 0
x = s = 0
a = str(n)
for i in range(len(a)):
s += int(a[i])
if s >= target:
break
x += 1
return int("1" + len(a[x:]) * "0") - int(a[x:]) | minimum-addition-to-make-integer-beautiful | Python solution using strings | ayamdobhal | 0 | 11 | minimum addition to make integer beautiful | 2,457 | 0.368 | Medium | 33,688 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-addition-to-make-integer-beautiful/discuss/2758238/Python-100-faster | class Solution(object):
def makeIntegerBeautiful(self, n, target):
def round_up(n, decimals = 0):
multiplier = 10 ** decimals
return math.ceil(n * multiplier) / multiplier
ln=len(str(n))
# print round_up(19,-2)
def sumi(m):
l=[]
for i in str(m):
l.append(int(i))
# print l
return sum(l)
if sumi(n)<=target:
# print l
return 0
else:
# print l,round_up(n,-(ln-1)),n
if ln>1:
temp=n
for i in range(1,15):
temp=int(round(round_up(n,-(i-1)))-n) + n
# print temp
# print(temp,sumi(int(temp)),round(round_up(n,-(i-1))),n)
if sumi(int(temp))<=target:
return abs(n-temp)
else:
return int(round_up(n,-1)-n) | minimum-addition-to-make-integer-beautiful | Python 100% faster | singhdiljot2001 | 0 | 19 | minimum addition to make integer beautiful | 2,457 | 0.368 | Medium | 33,689 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-addition-to-make-integer-beautiful/discuss/2758208/Python3-or-Greedy-%2B-Maths | class Solution:
def makeIntegerBeautiful(self, n: int, target: int) -> int:
n=list(map(int,str(n)))
curr=sum(n)
ans=0
i=0
n.reverse()
while curr>target:
d=10-n[i]
ans+=d*(10**i)
curr=curr-n[i]+1
if i<len(n)-1:
n[i+1]+=1
i+=1
return ans | minimum-addition-to-make-integer-beautiful | [Python3] | Greedy + Maths | swapnilsingh421 | 0 | 11 | minimum addition to make integer beautiful | 2,457 | 0.368 | Medium | 33,690 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-addition-to-make-integer-beautiful/discuss/2758134/Python-or-O(logn) | class Solution:
def makeIntegerBeautiful(self, n: int, target: int) -> int:
def isLess(n):
digit_sum = 0
while n!=0:
digit_sum += n%10
n //= 10
return True if (digit_sum <= target) else False
ans = 0
digit_position = 10
while 1:
if isLess(n):
return ans
else:
required = digit_position-(n%digit_position)
n += required
ans += required
digit_position *= 10
return ans | minimum-addition-to-make-integer-beautiful | Python | O(logn) | diwakar_4 | 0 | 17 | minimum addition to make integer beautiful | 2,457 | 0.368 | Medium | 33,691 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-addition-to-make-integer-beautiful/discuss/2758125/Python3-check-digits | class Solution:
def makeIntegerBeautiful(self, n: int, target: int) -> int:
diff = i = 0
while sum(map(int, str(n+diff))) > target:
i += 1
diff = 10**i - n % 10**i
return diff | minimum-addition-to-make-integer-beautiful | [Python3] check digits | ye15 | 0 | 14 | minimum addition to make integer beautiful | 2,457 | 0.368 | Medium | 33,692 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-addition-to-make-integer-beautiful/discuss/2758121/Intuitive-solution-within-10-lines | class Solution:
def makeIntegerBeautiful(self, n: int, target: int) -> int:
num = [int(i) for i in str(n)]
length, cur, out = len(num), 0, 0
for i in range(length):
cur+=num[i]
if cur>target or (cur==target and i<length-1 and sum(num[i+1:])>0):
goal = int('1'+'0'*(length-i))
out = goal-int(''.join([str(k) for k in num[i:]]))
break
return out | minimum-addition-to-make-integer-beautiful | Intuitive solution within 10 lines | 30qwwq | 0 | 10 | minimum addition to make integer beautiful | 2,457 | 0.368 | Medium | 33,693 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-addition-to-make-integer-beautiful/discuss/2758082/Python-3-Handling-from-right-oror-Time%3A-44-ms-Space%3A-13.9-MB | class Solution:
def makeIntegerBeautiful(self, n: int, target: int) -> int:
def calc(s):
ans=0
for i in s:
ans+=int(i)
return ans
ans=""
t=str(n)
s=calc(t)
while(s>target):
i=len(t)-1
while(t[i]=="0"):
i-=1
k=10-int(t[i])
ans+=str(10-int(t[i]))
t=str(int(t)+k*pow(10,len(t)-i-1))
s=calc(t)
i-=1
return int(t)-n | minimum-addition-to-make-integer-beautiful | Python 3 Handling from right || Time: 44 ms , Space: 13.9 MB | koder_786 | 0 | 15 | minimum addition to make integer beautiful | 2,457 | 0.368 | Medium | 33,694 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-addition-to-make-integer-beautiful/discuss/2758028/Python-simple-code-explained | class Solution:
def makeIntegerBeautiful(self, n: int, target: int) -> int:
#function to get sum of digits
def sumofc(num):
s = 0
while num != 0:
s += num % 10
num = int(num/10)
return s
sumc = sumofc(n)
ans = 0
tmpn = n
multp = 1
#keep making last digit zero till sum of digits is less than target
while sumc > target:
lastn = tmpn % 10
tmpn = int(tmpn/10) + 1
ans = ans + multp * (10 - lastn)
sumc = sumofc(tmpn)
multp = multp * 10
return ans | minimum-addition-to-make-integer-beautiful | Python simple code explained | pradyumna04 | 0 | 17 | minimum addition to make integer beautiful | 2,457 | 0.368 | Medium | 33,695 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/height-of-binary-tree-after-subtree-removal-queries/discuss/2760795/Python3-Triple-dict-depth-height-nodes_at_depth | class Solution:
def treeQueries(self, root: Optional[TreeNode], queries: List[int]) -> List[int]:
depth = {}
height = {}
nodes_at_depth = {}
max_height = 0
def rec(n, d):
nonlocal max_height
if n is None:
return 0
height_below = max(rec(n.left, d+1), rec(n.right, d+1))
v = n.val
depth[v] = d
h = d + 1 + height_below
height[v] = h
max_height = max(max_height, h)
if d not in nodes_at_depth:
nodes_at_depth[d] = [v]
else:
nodes_at_depth[d].append(v)
return 1 + height_below
rec(root, -1) # subtract one because the problem reports heights weird
ret = []
for q in queries:
if height[q] >= max_height:
d = depth[q]
for cousin in nodes_at_depth[depth[q]]:
if cousin != q: # don't count self, obviously
d = max(d, height[cousin])
ret.append(d)
else:
ret.append(max_height)
return ret | height-of-binary-tree-after-subtree-removal-queries | Python3 Triple dict depth, height, nodes_at_depth | godshiva | 0 | 12 | height of binary tree after subtree removal queries | 2,458 | 0.354 | Hard | 33,696 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/height-of-binary-tree-after-subtree-removal-queries/discuss/2758144/Python3-heights-by-level | class Solution:
def treeQueries(self, root: Optional[TreeNode], queries: List[int]) -> List[int]:
depth = {}
height = {0 : 0}
def fn(node, d):
if not node: return 0
depth[node.val] = d
height[node.val] = 1 + max(fn(node.left, d+1), fn(node.right, d+1))
return height[node.val]
h = fn(root, 0)
level = [[0, 0] for _ in range(h)]
for k, v in depth.items():
if height[k] >= height[level[v][0]]: level[v] = [k, level[v][0]]
elif height[k] > height[level[v][1]]: level[v][1] = k
ans = []
for q in queries:
d = depth[q]
if q == level[d][0]: ans.append(h-1-height[q]+height[level[d][1]])
else: ans.append(h-1)
return ans | height-of-binary-tree-after-subtree-removal-queries | [Python3] heights by level | ye15 | 0 | 56 | height of binary tree after subtree removal queries | 2,458 | 0.354 | Hard | 33,697 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/apply-operations-to-an-array/discuss/2786435/Python-Simple-Python-Solution-89-ms | class Solution:
def applyOperations(self, nums: List[int]) -> List[int]:
for i in range(len(nums)-1):
if nums[i]==nums[i+1]:
nums[i]*=2
nums[i+1]=0
temp = []
zeros = []
a=nums
for i in range(len(a)):
if a[i] !=0:
temp.append(a[i])
else:
zeros.append(a[i])
return (temp+zeros) | apply-operations-to-an-array | [ Python ] 🐍🐍 Simple Python Solution ✅✅ 89 ms | sourav638 | 3 | 31 | apply operations to an array | 2,460 | 0.671 | Easy | 33,698 |
https://leetcode.com/problems/apply-operations-to-an-array/discuss/2817847/Easy-Python-Solution | class Solution:
def applyOperations(self, nums: List[int]) -> List[int]:
l=[]
c=0
for i in range(len(nums)-1):
if(nums[i]==nums[i+1]):
nums[i]=nums[i]*2
nums[i+1]=0
for i in nums:
if i!=0:
l.append(i)
else:
c+=1
return l+[0]*c | apply-operations-to-an-array | Easy Python Solution | Vistrit | 2 | 30 | apply operations to an array | 2,460 | 0.671 | Easy | 33,699 |