Datasets:

breadlicker45

/

discord

like 1

Smelly Bum#1555

04/16/2021 6:49 AM

Scratch is ideal for teaching the basic concepts of coding. It's not generally great for anything outside of that.

Muslim Man#9041

04/16/2021 5:19 PM

Can we have an art channel?

Mal#5601

04/16/2021 5:19 PM

ye it's called #off-topic

L0laapk3#2010

04/16/2021 5:19 PM

ye its called #cpp

Mal#5601

04/16/2021 5:20 PM

I think you mean #scratch that's the only one with a visual window where you can do art

Konvertor#3146

04/16/2021 9:08 PM

Except SDC actually uses an ancient version of RLU for ball prediction, not the framework ball prediction. Thus why I said _technically_. It's pretty easy to swap it out for the framework ball prediction, but doing so reduces the tick rate and seems to cause mis-hits.

periapsis#3151

04/17/2021 3:17 AM

the RLBot GUI is really nice! props to everyone who worked on it

clappingsock (4)

BestCrazyNoob#2218

04/17/2021 5:19 AM

but it will use more cpu to do the calculations twice, and avoiding it is the main objective of integrated ball prediction

CTAG07#6191

04/18/2021 1:23 PM

Can we have a suggestions channel

🙄 (3),🤡 (1),judging_tare (1),🥴 (2),tux (1),whaa (1)

r0bbi3#0269

04/18/2021 1:41 PM

No :)

0x57696c6c#3433

04/18/2021 1:42 PM

goodbye #suggestions 👋

_DaCoolOne_#6111

04/18/2021 1:43 PM

#suggestions is now a past-tense noun

Deleted User#0000

04/18/2021 1:47 PM

#suggested

CTAG07#6191

04/18/2021 4:11 PM

Can we have a #suggested channel

GooseFairy#6680

04/18/2021 4:21 PM

sorry you have to make all suggestions in #memes now

Deleted User#0000

04/18/2021 4:21 PM

D:

Deleted User#0000

04/18/2021 4:22 PM

what about #discord-bots

Deleted User#0000

04/18/2021 4:22 PM

all suggestions should be put into a !suggestions command

_DaCoolOne_#6111

04/18/2021 8:26 PM

!suggest make a suggestions channel

jeroen11dijk#1178

04/19/2021 5:31 AM

wouldnt it be cool if we had a place where people could propose new ideas to improve the RLBot project

RLBot#1485

04/19/2021 5:34 AM

Channel police, anti-spam agent

Deleted User#0000

04/19/2021 6:22 AM

we do, it’s called making a pr to the rlbot repo

john idiot#4672

04/20/2021 11:39 AM

no, it's called #rlbot-discussion and #off-topic

Deleted User#0000

04/20/2021 12:00 PM

#off-topic 🥴

JibrilSage#4895

04/26/2021 12:09 PM

You know what would be epic- if there was a bot that could help train you to become a gc. Like have it demonstrate complex or normal shots in training packs n stuff. Like- a ghost system that could show how something is expected to be done by the map creator / show examples of other ways to do things.

JibrilSage#4895

04/26/2021 12:10 PM

It would create a whole new system for both developers and a whole new feel for rocket league

Soren#4101

04/26/2021 12:10 PM

Someone had a Kickstarter to build software that did that

JibrilSage#4895

04/26/2021 12:10 PM

this could also include a "training bot"

JibrilSage#4895

04/26/2021 12:10 PM

?? they did!?

Soren#4101

04/26/2021 12:10 PM

It's not done

JibrilSage#4895

04/26/2021 12:11 PM

I mean at least its hopefully being worked on.

JibrilSage#4895

04/26/2021 12:12 PM

I think a bot you can train with would be harder to accomplish as u'd need a 1v1 bot. But ghost like examples should be something that should be possible.

Soren#4101

04/26/2021 12:12 PM

Supposedly they would use high level play you could "ghost" in

Soren#4101

04/26/2021 12:12 PM

An interesting idea

Soren#4101

04/26/2021 12:13 PM

I got vaporware vibes thb but I've been wrong before

JibrilSage#4895

04/26/2021 12:15 PM

Well, once bots get more developed and hopefully implemented by RocketLeague. I hope that the bots can also be set to "teirs" rather than "just bots"

JibrilSage#4895

04/26/2021 12:16 PM

as I know if it was a casual match in a "gold" lobby it would be more useful to temporarily have more "gold" like activity than a bronze bot

JibrilSage#4895

04/26/2021 12:16 PM

Obviously no crazy tricks, but at least something worth contributing as a team member than rather just another nuisance u can crash into

CTAG07#6191

04/27/2021 10:31 AM

Be able to see all bots currently on field in scratch

CTAG07#6191

04/27/2021 10:31 AM

Please this is needed for decent team play with scratch

Deleted User#0000

04/27/2021 10:32 AM

team play in scratch

CTAG07#6191

04/27/2021 10:32 AM

It’s possible

Deleted User#0000

04/27/2021 10:32 AM

CTAG07#6191

04/27/2021 10:32 AM

If you’d just let scratch see all the bots

CTAG07#6191

04/27/2021 10:33 AM

Instead of two

CTAG07#6191

04/27/2021 10:33 AM

Then team play is possible

Deleted User#0000

04/27/2021 6:35 PM

The ability to adjust deadzones on the bot's controller

Deleted User#0000

04/27/2021 6:36 PM

I assume they're initially set to the default values? those are trash

CTAG07#6191

04/27/2021 6:36 PM

^

Deleted User#0000

04/27/2021 6:36 PM

I want to be able to adjust my bot's dodge deadzone in the middle of a game ):<

CTAG07#6191

04/27/2021 6:37 PM

I want to be able to make a good bot with scratch ):<

Deleted User#0000

04/27/2021 6:37 PM

you aren't supposed to be able to make a good bot in Scratch :smart:

CTAG07#6191

04/27/2021 6:38 PM

Exactly

CTAG07#6191

04/27/2021 6:38 PM

So we need to be able to

Deleted User#0000

04/27/2021 6:38 PM

lol no :4Tare:

CTAG07#6191

04/27/2021 6:39 PM

Yes

CTAG07#6191

04/27/2021 6:39 PM

Just add a “bots displayed” option in scratch config files

CTAG07#6191

04/27/2021 6:40 PM

And make it display that many bots until a certain limit

CTAG07#6191

04/27/2021 6:40 PM

And the limit is like 10

Darxeal#1784

04/27/2021 6:40 PM

?? deadzones mean nothing to bots, you can change your input to any number instantly

CTAG07#6191

04/27/2021 6:41 PM

Yeah

Darxeal#1784

04/27/2021 6:41 PM

dodge input is normalized anyway

Deleted User#0000

04/27/2021 6:41 PM

exactly, so if the deadzone is the default value for humans then that's dumb ):<

Deleted User#0000

04/27/2021 6:42 PM

I want *maximum* control of my bots

CTAG07#6191

04/27/2021 6:42 PM

Dead zones do nothing

Darxeal#1784

04/27/2021 6:42 PM

I'm not sure if you're trolling

Deleted User#0000

04/27/2021 6:43 PM

what? isn't the default dodge deadzone like 0.5 or something? that's dumb, I want it as low as possible bc it's a bot

CTAG07#6191

04/27/2021 6:43 PM

It doesn’t matter

CTAG07#6191

04/27/2021 6:43 PM

It’s like 0 anyway

Darxeal#1784

04/27/2021 6:44 PM

like I said, dodge input is a direction, it's normalized, it doesn't matter if it's 0.1 or 1

CTAG07#6191

04/27/2021 6:45 PM

Do this, it’s more important

luminouslamp367#0297

04/28/2021 10:16 PM

Make sure the process that decides which blocks in the GUI need the missing package warning re-checks after installing a package. Whenever I do, it doesn't disappear unless I restart or reload the bot folders

Darxeal#1784

04/29/2021 7:20 AM

I'm pretty sure reloading bot folders doesn't re-check the packages, because the entire python process has to be restarted for it to find the new installed package. But maybe there is a way to force it to look for them without restarting

Deleted User#0000

04/29/2021 7:24 AM

I’m pretty sure I’ve figured out a way to pre-compile python files - I don’t think it will compile JIT stuff, but it will generate pycache files and it’s really fast, even when doing it for the whole botpack

Deleted User#0000

04/29/2021 7:25 AM

should I auto pre-compile python files... ? should it be a button in the menu? should I do it at all?

Skyborg#0894

04/29/2021 9:05 PM

whats the advantage of it being pre-compiled? faster start time?

Deleted User#0000

04/29/2021 9:07 PM

mhmm

Soren#4101

04/29/2021 9:07 PM

I mean, python usually compiles and sticks stuck in __pycache__ . Is this not happening? Is there a problem that needs solving or is this a solution in search of a problem?

Deleted User#0000

04/29/2021 9:08 PM

yes, this would just do that but ahead of time

Soren#4101

04/29/2021 9:08 PM

😐

Soren#4101

04/29/2021 9:08 PM

I vote don't do this then

Soren#4101

04/29/2021 9:08 PM

you're adding complexity for a problem that's already solved

Deleted User#0000

04/29/2021 9:08 PM

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Skyborg#0894

04/29/2021 9:09 PM

have you measured the difference btw? is it noticeable? XD

Deleted User#0000

04/29/2021 9:09 PM

not really on my 4800H...

Skyborg#0894

04/29/2021 9:10 PM

😑

Skyborg#0894

04/29/2021 9:10 PM

That button would bring more harm than good then XD

Skyborg#0894

04/29/2021 9:13 PM

Also, would it "recompile" if the source code was changed by the user?

Deleted User#0000

04/29/2021 9:35 PM

I was just thinking, if it was automatic, that it would just do it for the updated files upon a botpack update

Deleted User#0000

04/29/2021 9:36 PM

but i get ur point, lol

Deleted User#0000

04/29/2021 9:36 PM

I’ve only written like 5 loc anyways xD

swz#4419

04/30/2021 2:38 AM

a way to run bots in other langs without a python agent file

swz#4419

04/30/2021 2:58 AM

for example: ```cfg # Annoying agent python_file=./config/agent.py # No annoying agent run_command=node ../index.js ```

swz#4419

04/30/2021 2:58 AM

and itll pass things like index and stuff as command line args

Deleted User#0000

04/30/2021 5:45 AM

RLBot is written in Python

Deleted User#0000

04/30/2021 5:45 AM

doing so would probably make adding new language support harder

Eastvillage#2628

04/30/2021 5:58 AM

RLBot knows how to handle the bot based on the Agent type it inherits from in agent.py. It seems possible to sidestep and let the command handle it, though I imaging there's a reason this wasn't done originally.

swz#4419

04/30/2021 6:15 AM

adding new language support would be easier imo, just check the cmd line args and connect via sockets

swz#4419

04/30/2021 6:15 AM

now i have to make a separate socket just for python to tell js to add a bot

Deleted User#0000

04/30/2021 6:15 AM

no, because you would have to directly integrate your language into RLBot