text stringlengths 1 299k | label stringclasses 4
values | lang stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|---|
June 27, 2006
Thank you for experimenting with the page Novato High School on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. - | toxic | en |
evidence of more personal attacks by nandesuka
(cur) (last) 17:03, 10 December 2005 Nandesuka (→Blocked - On second thought, even responding to this is pointless. You can have the last word. Enjoy it.)
is the history line for this now-deleted post that followed my most recent post to this talk page:
Nope, nope, still not taking the bait. I wish you good
luck with all of your future endeavors that don't
involve personal attacks, trolling, or general disruption.
Apparently, he still considers posting the facts to be trolling. | toxic | en |
"
I did not say I agreed with them. But I draw attention to the fact that the people you malign – Shupe, Bromley, Barker, Wilson, Introvigne, Lewis, Richardson, Palmer, Wessinger, Ammerman, Melton, Tabor, Gallagher, Chryssides, etc., are leading scholars in this field, writing for top university presses, and that their views are in the majority in the field. 466 " | toxic | en |
"
Welcome
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits, such as the ones to the page Drainage divide, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the ""sandbox"" rather than in articles.
If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Help pages
Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of User talk:Lukep913my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! (Talk) " | toxic | en |
Cher, her photo should be the real Cher,, 92 yr old Cher, witch of LA | adult_sexism | en |
":::One more thing, while the article title matches with those of the naming conventions, moving ""Sultan Iskandar of Johor"" alone would break the pattern of naming in Category:Monarchs of Malaysia as most articles begin with ""Sultan"" here. Unless a mass move is initiated, there could be chances whereby unwitting users may revert back to the old namethis is possible especially if they are not well informed and would generally infer from what they see at first sight.
" | toxic | en |
"
Your email
First I should say it's best to communicate on-wiki for the sake of transparency. Secondly, you accused me of lying when I said that I was called various names. Because of that accusation I will quote the bit of the email I saw as calling me names: "" Deleting information according to your OWN opinion is the worst form of censorship. Despicable."" I interpreted that as calling me a censor and despicable. I've got a thick skin so I'm not really bothered. I'm not sure why you haven't commented at the talk page yourself as you are reading it. " | toxic | en |
F-16 Fightiing Falcon Photo captions
Per you comments on the F-16 article - yes, commas can work, but it make the captions very messy and hard to read (almost like having a run on sentence). If you seperate the important information with breaks as well as centering makes the captions more professional and much easier to read. I have been using this format for captions for the survivors articles and works extremely well. Added a bunch of details for the captions as well | toxic | en |
Yes! In the first episode the Defiant appears, Sisko explains that the Defiant prototype was 'mothballed' when the Borg threat waxed then waned; perhaps they kept the registry as is as a temp measure or to obfuscate viewers.
As well, supposedly, while on training exercises, the Valiant with crew and cadets, was somehow disabled (attacked, I think), command and other officers/crew were killed, and cadets were then in charge (but didn't know how to repair the warp engines sufficiently). (Big mistake.) ) | toxic | en |
Johnuniq and Quietmark,
This is my last response. I do not have a problem with how you handled the discussion page and I appreciate the polite responses. I brought up my PhD in statistics because a contributor thought it would be appropriate to just delete my discussion, so I wanted to know why they felt that was within their purview. Do they hold some higher degree or happen to be an expert in evolutionary theory to whom I should defer? I am not a creationist trying to tear apart evolution, but a scientist trying to scientifically discuss the article. As such, my comments should not be quickly dismissed, but should be answered.
I made the suggestion that there are many verified methods of falsifiability, which have been in either peer-reviewed journal articles or stated by Darwin himself (I believe this post was deleted, but I can provide them and their references to help out this section, btw I can find at least four or five, which is more than are currently listed, but are actually correct). This article listed none of these methods of falsifiability in the section labeled falsifiability.
I don’t want creationism taught in school. One of the methods of falsifiability this article mentions requires a deity. This opens up Pandora’s box. How easily could a creationist say “What’s good for the goose is good for the gander?” If a deity can be used for falsifiability (the cornerstone of a scientific theory), then obviously it is allowed into science. If it is allowed into science, then keeping creationism and ID out is not justifiable. Do not give creationists such an easy target.
Other methods mentioned in the article, I easily disputed using only the definition of falsifiability found at wiki, among other places. While you (in general) have dismissed my claims as being SYN, you could not break the logic used nor provide an argument as to why I might be wrong. This is like shooting fish in a barrel and you are giving creationists the ammo to do so. How much ammo do you want to give them?
Royboy, first the definition of chimera they are using has change from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chimera_(genetics) so the definition has already changed, because these exist. Beyond that, evolution does not inherently predict that there are no chimeras as long as the lineage can be traced back and it was advantageous to have say a lion’s head and a horse’s body. And as for the genetic variation being easily verified, how would this be done? Our knowledge of genetic coding is very limited, and is certainly not to the point of finding the small changes that would appear relatively quickly in a population as you are suggesting. The number of microarrays involved would be cost prohibitive and lead large error rates that would only find very large genetic anomalies. Beyond that, reason would dictate that mankind as been relatively the same for a million years, thus these are very slow processes. In fact, I think you could be the first evolutionist I have ever heard, that is suggesting that these are quick processes.
I am playing devil’s advocate, because I have found that it is the best way to truly test the validity of what is being stated and this is the scientific way. Look again at my previous posts (at least the posts that have not been deleted), not only do I say what section needs to be changed and why, but I have “quoted reliable sources that throw doubt on some aspects of the article”. I have no peer-reviewed journal article stating that these methods of falsifiability are wrong because nobody has a peer-reviewed journal article stating that they are correct, so why would anybody argue against a point that hasn’t been made? I may be able to find some creationist webpage, but I don’t want that in the article either. You may be right that I am committing SYN, but these are relatively simple arguments that can easily be made by others. I’m not trying to denigrate evolution, so there would be no point to making an article called “Are objections to evolution valid”. I just want science to prevail. Make arguments strong and scientifically justifiable or they will be used as weapons to attack evolution.
I believe that the section on falsifiability needs to be overhauled and carefully reconsidered, this is the wiki wringer you are mentioning Quietmark, my posts are part of that. I’m not asking it to be overhauled right now, but I think it does need to happen. This, however, I leave to your (collective) judgment. If you would like me to review or help out, I am willing to do so, but only by email or talk. I will not be editing this site or discussion page again. It is my opinion that fair scientific discussion is not prevailing here, as nearly all of my material have been deleted or archived. Sorry it took so long to post this response, a user within this article had me blocked. | toxic | en |
Fixed, thanks to . ᛭ | toxic | en |
Then why don't you apologize for bad POV edits, like I do? If you keep on making clumsy POV edits without apologies then may be it is not so strange that I get a wrong impression of you? | toxic | en |
"
""I have made proper amends for any violation that I have done previous.""
WP:PA clearly states that ""using someone's affiliations as a means of dismissing or discrediting their views"" is a violation of policy. I'm awaiting amends, but likely this will just be deleted.
""If any of you even tried to come to the Warhammer wiki, you will be shown the door, because they don't tolerate such disruptions""
This was learned this after a single day of editing?
You do good work, SanchiTachi. It's a shame that you don't want to get along with us. ( –'''' " | toxic | en |
If you're too stubborn to read and absorb what I'm saying, then that's not my fault.
::: | toxic | en |
"
I do agree to not post on his page now that I know that a user can protest such a thing and actually have another editor punished in such a manner.
""I think a commitment to stop attacking other people who try to get you to follow Wikipedia policies would be some help too."" The only rule I know is that I try to treat others as I would have them treat me. If someone wants to talk to me, I will act like an adult and listen to them and they can post anything they like. I would prefer they not use expletives, but my skin is very thick. It is imperative that people be allowed to notifiy others of a desire for a serious and frank and open discussion in a public forum. Where is that forum on WP if not on the user page either his or mine. How are we to have a meeting of minds if I cannot at least invite him to such an honest discussion? But now that I know that is a no I will cease and simply respond to him on my page as if he is there. He is welcome to post anything.
I guess I am just one of those simple editors that don't want to become conversant in the rules of WP (of which there are none except for the convoluted mess of many) and how it works. I simply go about improving the writing and hoping to not be attacked from out of the blue by a troll.
I thought there were different levels of blocks. If not, why not? Seems a bit odd. The user Andy began this many, many months ago with highly abusive behavior toward myself and other users and it continues to this day. For some reason those that know the rules (of which there are none except for the convoluted mess of many) seem to have people such as yourself at the ready to respond to every little perceived infraction. How does that work? Of course the rule of ""assume good intentions"" is overlooked every time in favor of those of those who quote the rules (don't make me say it again) and are responded to by those like yourself whose minds are sensitively tuned in such a way to the shrieks of the rule-quoters; brings to mind a clutch of baby birds calling to their parents." | toxic | en |
Former Porn Star and Hollywood actor turned P.I. PAUL BARRESI conducted investigations on behalf of dozens of Hollywood celebrities including:
TOM CRUISE
SYLVESTER STALLONE
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER
EDDIE MURPHY
BARRY BONDS | toxic | en |
Show-and-tell nearly extinct because it might hurt children's
URL: http://www.newsisfree.com/click/-2,8423194,1717/
Date: 2002-10-01T08:34:11+01:00
(St. Petersburg Times)
| scam | en |
, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Can you fix them yourself? 21:32 | toxic | en |
But a layman reading the article does not get that point as well as you have just laid out. There are multiple sections that go into technical shortcomings of the design, | toxic | en |
"
OK, we both go away with our own privately held opinions as to who ""started this chaos"". (And of course I was moving, not removing, your posts - or Blueboar's and mine, if you prefer - once I got the message that you insisted on having the personal discussion at the policy talk page instead of on ours.) " | toxic | en |
Thanks for your comment. I'll give the article a go, although in truth most of the info is in the scrum.com article so it'll be more of a paraphrase than anything truly original. You'll have noticed that Clem Thomas appeared again, maybe not to your liking... | toxic | en |
Take a look==
..at the article about Ester Claesson and Lo Kauppi. Thank you.
== | toxic | en |
Merge
I am completing the merge proposal after three weeks with no comment and no edits. | toxic | en |
"
To the circumcision boss said that ""banned is banned."" Son, you might want to take an Introduction to Western Civilization course at your local community college. You're so unfamiliar with the Enlightenment that you don't realize that ""banned"" is a badge of honor in the history of human progress. 82.128.204.29 " | toxic | en |
Sweden: Migrant rapes cancer-surviving mother while her child is sleeping in the other room [URL] | adult_sexism | en |
:::Biosketch: Thank you very much for reaching out to me on my talk page, and for being sincerely concerned about my opinion. The short answer is that I sincerely think that you are wrong in what you say here, and that I have tried very hard to explain why I think that on the article talk page. I've listened carefully to your arguments, and I find them unconvincing. That doesn't mean that I think you are saying these things in bad faith. Quite to the contrary, I am sure that you have thought about this a lot and believe very strongly that you are correct. That's what happens sometimes in editorial disagreements.
:::Please do not worry that I somehow feel pressured into making a compromise. I'm actually quite happy to have made that edit, because I value collegiality on Wikipedia, and also, frankly, because I think the whole business about one animal welfare group is no big deal. If my edit created an opportunity for editors to move on, I'm very satisfied.
:::On the other hand, I am disappointed with your recent attitude towards me, and with the fact that you did not chose to comment on that here. When you identified alternative sources for that section of the page, I welcomed that information, complimented you on it, and tried to reach out to you to cooperate on improving that part of the page. In fact, I have, pretty much single handedly, done pretty much everything you asked for in my edits. You instead commented in the thread that Griswaldo opened at ORN that I was, in your words, trying to divide and conquer, and you subsequently ridiculed a good faith mistake I made, and said at the article talk page that I was penitent. I'm not the one who should be penitent. | toxic | en |
He's obviously based on the Alien Hominid, and that's what the official site calls him. May as well leave it.76.10.75.168 | toxic | en |
NIELN is one of the anti Santacon axe grinding editors that advanced an agenda of non neutrality, edit warring, 3 R reverting, vandalism that are all forbidden by Wikipedia rules. | toxic | en |
thanks
thanks for telling me that(new to the template). i started a discussion on the talk page. | toxic | en |
"
We have ""wp:Lua"" as a start, but we will expect computer programmers as the first group, and yet try to reach a point where ""markup users"" can help to adjust the Lua script source code. Because of the base complexity, the related JavaScript and toolserver people will be the most likely to work with Lua at first. However, there will be more Lua-based templates which act as ""super-templates"" which the markup users can combine as powerful tools. -
Lua readership has doubled from 2009/2010: I was looking back to Lua readership in 2009, which I had forgotten was an issue back then, so no wonder the installation of Lua seemed like a will-it-ever-arrive frustration. Anyway, back in 2009, there were ~640 Lua pageviews per day, but later increased in 2010 to 720/day, and now we have ~1,280/day. Compare the growth of January pageview graphs in years 2009-2013:
Even though the active editors have maintained a relatively stable article-edit rate for the past 3 years, the reader interest in article ""Lua (programming language)"" has grown to double during those years. We might even attract users who prefer helping to improve Lua modules, rather than articles, and could become more future developers to accelerate other software improvements to simplify the editing of articles. I had not realized how a thousand people a day read about Lua here. - " | toxic | en |
Awwwwwwwww. Did I hurt your feelings? | toxic | en |
ANNAfoxlover.
I see you left her a message about adminship as well. Yes; I had to tell her that she shouldn't do it, and I'm surprised she hasn't removed that message from her user page yet. I'm concerned that if she did nominate herself, she would be very disappointed with the results. | toxic | en |
Bournemouth blues
URL: http://www.newsisfree.com/click/-2,8666353,215/
Date: 2002-10-08T12:47:59+01:00
*Cartoon: Steve Bell *on the Conservative party conference.
| scam | en |
"
The World Would Be a Better Place Without You
" | toxic | en |
Did I miss something? I merely undid a reversion where no explanation was left in the edit summary as to why the edit was reverted. The user in question has been reprimanded in a recent ANI for not leaving edit summaries as required by policy. I am merely enforcing the ANI result. 85.255.235.62 | toxic | en |
So normal women? Ofc RP and incels hate normal looking women and feel they are entitled for some perfect Stacies | adult_sexism | en |
Agreed. The term ‘blastocyst’ appears to be based on a false distinction that has been drawn between ‘the embryo proper’ and the embryo at an earlier stage of development, sometimes the term ‘pre-embryo’ is used in this context. However the precise stage at which an embryo can be classified as a ‘blastocyst’ or a 'pre-embryo' seems to involve a somewhat subjective judgement. The article currently says:
A blastocyst is a stage of development of an embryo when it is around five days old and made up of about 100 cells.
Because of their highly subjective nature, terms such as bastocyst and pre-embryo are problematic and may be criticised for trying to dehumanize the human embryo. | toxic | en |
你会说英文吗？ | scam | en |
"
Proposed deletion of Duane Elgin
I have removed the proposed deletion tag you placed on Duane Elgin, as the article underwent a deletion discussion several years ago and per policy is permanently ineligible for deletion under the proposed deletion process. If you wish to pursue deletion, another deletion discussion must be opened. To do that, please first go over the deletion policy and the alternatives to deletion. If you still believe that the article should be deleted, you may follow the instructions at WP:AFDHOWTO, taking care to follow the special instructions for second nominations. If you need help with any of this, please leave me a note on my talk page. —Talk " | toxic | en |
A tag has been placed on Terry wright, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Sax456 | toxic | en |
Anyway, the revision
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ajaib_Singh&oldid;=428093774
is nice and simple, clear and to the point, and free of any 'controversy', much to the chagrin of the English-illiterates. So please either remove the entry, or permanently make the link I provided as unchangeable, and everyone will be happy, everyone with half a brain, that is. | toxic | en |
:Wtf for? | toxic | en |
Green Party Convention
Does anyone know when the Green Party National Convention is going to be? If so, can it be put on the page? | toxic | en |
Christmas Day and New Year Broadcasts
Shouldn't it be noted that TODAY Show on Christmas Day and New Year Day are pre-tape and that they are specials broadcasts of the show?Those are the only days out the whole year that all four hours are pre-tape and they are not live. | toxic | en |
742 Evergreen Terrace - Snake's house?
742 Evergreen Terrace is depicted as Snake's house in this episode - and next door, where Ned Flanders is supposed to be, was Rev. Lovejoy. What's up with that? 67.187.111.107 | toxic | en |
Right, basically, if something is confusing or poorly defined, feel free to clarify; saying what devil fruits are is something that should be in the article, but a list of all devil fruits should not be. | toxic | en |
Congratulations and welcome back. | toxic | en |
Being yourself a mormon and actively working in wikipedia for the sole purpose to defend mormons interests your decision cannot be accepted. You are a like a member of the klux klux klan parading as impartial judge in a trial against a black.
This cannot be accepted and will not be.
You are diorectly violating the first 6 rules of wikipedia and I will not let you escape from this gratuituously.
Sophie | toxic | en |
==Conflict of interest warning== | toxic | en |
"
==IDRIVE==
{| class=""messagebox standard-talk"" style=""background-color: #c5fcdc;""
|-
|
| Thank you for your support of This week's Improvement Drive.This week Spice trade was selected to be improved to featured article status.Hope you can help…
|}" | toxic | en |
== LUNCH WIT BIGFOOT ==
ME AND BIGFOOT ATE AT MCDONALDS. | toxic | en |
Vì nó là một cơ hội để các tên giang hồ Hướng đạo từ khắp nơi trên thế giới tụ họp và giao lưu với nhau. Đồng thời, nó cũng là dịp để các tên giang hồ Hướng đạo thể hiện sự mạnh mẽ và khả năng tự lập của mình. Nói chung là một sự kiện quan trọng để các tên giang hồ Hướng đạo tự thể hiện và khoe khoang. | toxic | vi |
"
bail out or bale out?
For ""escape by parachute"", my copy of Chambers Dictionary authorizes both spellings equally. I am British. I am more familiar with the spelling ""bale out"". Perhaps this is yet another case where usual UK and USA spellings differ.
First, ""bailing water"" is never spelt baling water and I doubt you'd find that in Chambers.
For the parachute bailing, we use British English almost exclusively for the most part in Australia too, yet I've never once seen this use of bale (as in ""bale out of an aircraft"") although it is evidently an alternate spelling of bail. But since ""bail out of an aircraft"" is the way it's spelt at least 50% of the time in Britain and close to 100% of the time elsewhere (according to this WorldWideWords article), don't you think this information should go at the Bail disambig page on Wikipedia and there is already a link to this from Bale. " | toxic | en |
You answered yourself. Th wrong and POV concept Greater persia is found only in a few (weak) sources. | toxic | en |
That's a rather feeble premise to argue showing an excessive number of photos prominently showing 24 different women's vaginas, compared to one human male penis 3/4 of the way down the page on the equivalent article for male genitalia. This demonstrates the overwhelming male bias in editorial content on Wikipedia. 86.13.182.103 | toxic | en |
That would make sense. The new Party constitution doesn't give the leader much more control actually! But that will change this year I'd have thought. | toxic | en |
September 2008 (UTC)
Sabine, I very much disagree with your view of economics.
At the top I just expressed myself in a fun sort of way.
John Quiggin feels he has the right to censor my funny way of saying I totally disagree with you.
He just deleted the top part.
I think that is wrong.
Just as you have all the right in the world to state your view, so I have all the right in the world to say I totally disagree with you. Even in a fun way - if I so feel like it and not insult you. Lunatic fringe - in my view - is applied to everybody to everyone else who they do not agree with.
I hope you see it that way too.
I also have the right to excercise my author´s liberty and say it in a non-conventional way.
I do not think John Quiggin has the right to censor that.
Feel free to have me banned/blocked/taken out/whatever.
00:19, 15 | toxic | en |
There's a chance a woman can get breast cancer later in life, resulting in her needing her breasts removed. Does that mean we should automatically remove the breasts of every young girl because there's a chance she may have future problems with them? | adult_sexism | en |
Chief of Surgery
We need some more information on Derek become Chief. | toxic | en |
"
It's a pretty obvious joke. World of Warcraft took so much from Everquest, why Guitar Hero, too? (Though the ""new axe"" was pretty cool) " | toxic | en |
"
I note that there's no ""address"" and ""phone"" parameters at Template:Infobox church. If I change ""address"" to read ""location"", the address does display. I'm not sure if street address is normally included in church infoboxes: the documentation at Template:Infobox church/doc seems to indicate otherwise. " | toxic | en |
@RPopBox @boxing Yeah he definitely wasn't the same guy who fought Lara but he cuts the ring off well which should be a huge boon to Canelo | toxic | en |
"Would you like my dick in your mouth?" ? | adult_sexism | en |
If you remove this article OK, but still I doubt that you catch the most general aspect of curvature in the sense of Nomizu, Kulkarni and other modern writers. Look at the reference where you find more references. In the references there (look also that one in Lecture Notes in Mathematics) you find a decomposition of the space of all curvature structures in terms of Lie and Jordan algebras. And you find how elegantly electrodynamics and gravitational waves fit into the curvature play, look at the basic work of Lichnerowics. As an ,algebraiker' I like to write the curvature structure in the following triple form, generalizing the concept of Lie triples (the book of Otmar Loos is a nice generalization of Lie theory):
[x,y,z]=R(x,y)z. This concept generalizes the notion of a Lie triple to that one of a curvature triple, where only the Jacobiidentity is missing, but a reference to the bilinear form <,> is added in such a way, that R(x,y) is an element of the pseudoorthogonal Lie algebra. Note that the complete work of Ricci, Einstein and Weyl can be summarized as a decomposition of the space of curvature structures of Levi type (for Lie algebras). All this shows, that we do not yet understand this curvature space completely. Especially the gravitational wave aspect needs clarification. Hannes Tilgner | toxic | en |
"Should I have said ""Excuse me, but please don't tell people I'm a paedophile""? " | toxic | en |
"
Suzy Sachs Page
I have edited out ""Creator"" from her page and you added it again. Nowhere is there any documentation backing up the ""Creator"" claim. All links provided never mention Sachs as Creator. I will stop edits to this page when this false ""Creator"" claim is removed. Thank you for your help." | toxic | en |
"Opposed - Keep as ""Pope Francis"". According to the Pope's official Twitter ""HABEMUS PAPAM FRANCISCUM"" no use of ordinal .
*" | toxic | en |
"
This issue is being discussed on the stewards mailing list. See m:WM:SPAM#tunisia.com. Mike Lifeguard says it is likely the community of rmywiki will be alerted and decide the fate of Desiphral. Personally I too am weary of a spammer having his own Wiki. [[User talk:Triplestop|'''Triplestop''']] x3 " | toxic | en |
:I've been sitting on the edge of the pool, reluctant to dive in. Thanks for the nudge. ;-) | toxic | en |
==Misuse of tools==
I agree with your block of the user's IP. I agree that you were doing what another admin would do. However, you need to let other admins handle it. In the future you should go ask for assistance at a noticeboard. Even if you do not deserve it (I feel you do), other editors view you in such a negative light that when you use your tools it raises more questions than answers. Stop using your admin tools in the topic area. You can wait 5 minutes to get an answer on IRC if you think it is a bad enough issue. This is real simple: You are involved throughout the topic are to the point that your judgement is in question. Next time it may not be a sock. You have already proven that you don't give a shit about decorum. Editors like me want to see you screw up more for the fun of seeing you stripped. How about you just let others handle the clean up instead? Alternatively, we can just watch and compile diffs of you failing as an admin but boomerrang will be used since the community gets so crybaby when an admin is put to the test. | toxic | en |
incels more cared for and privileged than for example women and gays You broke the LARPing roof. | adult_sexism | en |
To NawlinWiki
Please can you explain to me and the thousands of people out there who have experienced the same issue, the huge double standards that take place on wikipedia. The post you deleted is no different than a lot of other posts on this site. See as a reference. It seems to me that every post on this site is at the whim of the ego of the wiki editor in charge at that time. I am not asking for this page to be considered for inclusion if it is not a relevant page but i am asking for some solid standards and that every page be judged equally. | toxic | en |
Agree. I had the same idea about Sauscony Lahaylia Valdoria Skolia before. I'll contact you when I am done. Thank you for your effort. | toxic | en |
not to be rude, But largeprimenumbers is not a valid source, and this article is a pack of lies thanks to that. | toxic | en |
deal 338634 meter 985077
the above deal was in the system for 7 / 1 / 00 to 12 / 31 / 00 . we have had
continued flow on the following dates . . .
1 / 4 / 01 to 1 / 8 / 01
1 / 29 / 01
2 / 7 / 01 to 2 / 28 / 01
the total flow has been 2804 .
can this deal be extended to cover the january and february flow ? | scam | en |
So, am i block or something? cause I already had a 'statement' on the matter...you know, i wanted to showboat and be happy I was joining Nishi and Ash in exile... | toxic | en |
At the end of the day it sounds like you just have really bad anxiety. Try meditating before you talk to people. Or, you could try and memorize what she is saying. Play games with yourself, and don't get pissed if you mess up. | adult_sexism | en |
"
I am asking if there is a reference where the term ""Indian loyalists"" is used like there is for the term ""freedom fighters"". Whether they were loyal to the British cause or disloyal to the Indian one is a moot point and depends on which perspective you are looking from. " | toxic | en |
There was a bad redirect that dumped all talk onto the wrong page... | toxic | en |
", much like named ""clan tartans,""" | toxic | en |
excessive vandalism
i have already been informed of vandalism policies, and I don't need to be reminded too much. and bob dylan is overrated. do not bother me again. | toxic | en |
"
Most of the last edit seems to belong to the talk page rather than in the article, so I have moved it so I can be discussed.
Broader context
Use of the term ""psychoanalytic theory"" implies that there is a core theory which is complete by itself. This view is not common even among practicing analysts, who in large part recognise that the mind is a function of the brain, so that any full theory of the psyche needs to refer to the brain. An excellent review of this is Kandel ER (1999) ""Biology and the future of psychoanalysis"", Am.J.Psychiat 156:505.
Psychoanalytic thinking is inseparably bound also to clinical treatment of patients. Some purists claim that achieving insight is the only goal of psychoanalysis; but health insurers generally require more concrete goals such as reduced mental illness or increased time at work. Both of these clinical perspectives assume that the effect on actual patients is important so they should be included in this article. An excellent review of the clinical benefits of psychoanalysis is Fonagy, Roth & Higgitt (2005), Bull.Menninger Clinic 69(1):1-58.
This article would not be complete without consideration of substantial attacks on psychoanalysis and its theory, which have reshaped psychiatric practice in the UK and USA over the past 20-30 years. These attacks can be classified as empirical (Gabbard, Gunderson & Fonagy 2002); financial (Detre & McDonald 1997); theoretical (Meehl 1998 calculates that there are many psychoanalytical explanations possible for any single clinical problem); and circumstantial (e.g. past failures with respect to homosexuality and childhood abuse, and the antipathy of many analysts to quantitative research: Gabbard, Gunderson & Fonagy 2002).
Psychoanalytic theorists may have over-reached themselves in attempting to account for all troublesome psychic phenomena. However, their concerted efforts to address more circumscribed areas have produced widely acknowledged, influential advances in the areas of defense mechanisms, attachment, the unconscious, transference and counter-transference, and the treatment of borderline personalities, among others. Each of these advances has been accompanied by individual theories.
Suggestions for the peer-review
The article should not require a paragraph to describe what it is about; instead, its scope should simply be theories to do with psychoanalysis. It should include subsections on the question of whether (and how) psychoanalysis can be studied objectively, whether it is disproveable in whole or part (and whether this matters), the informal ""theory"" of the manners in which analysis can be conducted (e.g. bare room unlike Freud; methods of interpretation), and the relationships with behavioural, cognitive, and psychiatric theories. It would be useful to have an explanation of why psychoanalysis has resisted decline so much more successfully in France than in anglophone countries. Rather than complicated sentences with complicated words, we should be treated to simple descriptions of the differences between Freudian, Jungian, and Adlerian thinking. Possibly in lists if that helps to simplify the sentences." | toxic | en |
"
Sorry, but there is no ""network"" for ""Ecoles polytechniques"", contrary to Ecoles centrales or Ecoles des mines. The word ""polytechnique"" is very misleading !
The categories ""Ecoles nationales supérieures"" or ""Ecoles supérieures"" are irrelevant ! You have put in the same category institutions which have nothing to do together ! It was a capharnaüm ! " | toxic | en |
May I ask
How you are continually getting away with personal attacks and sockpuppetry, while are banned for less? | toxic | en |
I wouldn't change the pre-existing Port of Barcelona articlelots of names get anglicized on english wikipedia and there should be a redirect, but it's not necessarily wrong to leave them. Your explanation makes more sense to me now. | toxic | en |
Yes, I'm asking do you have to cut out fapping entirely or just porn | adult_sexism | en |
"
You just said ""there is no meaning"". |☺ " | toxic | en |
Agreed, which is why I have not been removing the small portion of this article that could be considered well referenced. - | toxic | en |
0/10. I am hideous and women look at me like I'm a monster. | adult_sexism | en |
"
If this article left you with the impression that the EmDrive is as mainstream as ""most experiments currently happening around the world"" then the article is presenting an overly-optimistic point of view. The device is supposed to create a force without an equal an opposite reaction force. That is a fringe idea if there ever was one. " | toxic | en |
"@Stephenwildboy: Chilling 👅™ sexy scally lad | toxic | en |
Thank you! I usually find persistence is its own reward, but in this case I will make an exception! - | toxic | en |
The claim of sexual assault is an allegation, not a fact. The title is misleading and this section is a meme for CBS media and its fellow travelers.
Hopefully, a rational moderator will issue corrections to this page. | toxic | en |
"
Edits for Your Consideration
Well I see the hounds are already out rapidly editing, which is fine. Two requests for your consideration please:
1) ""Texas Government Newsletter"" needs a reference. It had one but it was removed so it is now un-referenced. The reference I have below is from the Library of Congress US Copyright Office showing the official copyright by me of the publication. Seems like a really SOLID ref to me. Here it is (although I cannot test my coding so please verify it is right, although the link is definitely correct. I used their exact additional language re the copyright):
Texas Government Newsletter / Don Martin (i.e. Donald G. Martin) editor. ISSN: 0164-9221. U.S. Government Copyright Office.
2) NN has removed my client list as expected. The fact that I have such top-notch clients (Dell, Tokyo Electron, AT&T;, Southland Corp, etc) seems to me to help establish at least some level of notability and shows the level where my business operates. All of the listed clients (100%) have Wikipedia pages and are therefore all also internal links. To be fair, he, on the other hand, asserts that the article is about the man, not the business, and the external link to my website should cover it. I guess it is a decision for other editors to make. Please consider if this edit might should be reverted. Thanks. (Don Martin) " | toxic | en |
your riskmetrics site password
dear ,
thank you for registering .
your requested username is vincek and your password is longrun .
you may use this login to :
- use the data directory at http : / / www . riskmetrics . com / products / data / index . cgi
- access the creditmetrics datasets at
. html
- access the riskmetrics datasets at
tml
- read our technical documents at
- read our monitors at http : / / www . riskmetrics . com / research / journals / index . cgi
- read risk management : a practical guide at
please let us know if you have any questions or concerns ,
rmg web services
web @ riskmetrics . com | scam | en |
, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
The spoken word version is nowhere close to the current content of the article. It was a good enough reading (ignoring the slight speech impediment, anyway) but it might as well have been randomly linked to some other article's reading, given the wholesale changes to this article since the recording was made. IMHO, of course. -) ⇒ T/C 23:31 | toxic | en |
War film?
Is this really a war film? I can't find any site listing it as one. | toxic | en |
doorpost - post doorstep
in my response to brent price on the london doorstep review i alluded to the
incompleteness of the list of issues . as i outlined , the key point has been
identified , but its knock - on effects are widespread and worrying ,
especially as they concern the continental power operation :
as of today the most recent finalised dpr for this business was for 11 th may ,
and during the period between then and now we have seen ( although in milder
form ) a repeat of the turmoil on the amsterdam power exchange ( apx ) that we
witnessed in january this year . this is not the time or the market to not
know our position .
the business is soon to apply for higher limits to accommodate a new
transaction on the polish border . i am bound to comment that based on the
state it appears to be in , i would not recommend higher limits .
to add insult to injury , as a result of the way this area has been allowed to
develop , much of the know - how is in the heads ( and spreadsheets ) of certain
key individuals who it seems are now bound rapidly for ebs .
uk gas seems to have slipped too . yesterday they reported a $ 7 m loss due to
the value of a set of options which were part of a structured deal , booked
" off - system " and not revalued for over a month . worryingly , there seemed to
be more time spent arguing over the nuances of a loss notification memo , than
answering some fundamental questions about why it happened .
as a corollary , our process of performing " risk reviews " has become all the
more important in identifying holes in our capture and treatment of market
risk in the firm . i expect these to play a big part in our effort to
stabilise these areas .
dp
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - forwarded by david port / market risk / corp / enron on
05 / 17 / 2000 10 : 31 am - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
from : david port
05 / 17 / 2000 09 : 30 am
to : brent a price / hou / ect @ ect
cc : mike jordan / lon / ect @ ect , steve w young / lon / ect @ ect , tani
nath / lon / ect @ ect , mark pickering / lon / ect @ ect , joe gold / lon / ect @ ect , james
new / lon / ect @ ect , richard lewis / lon / ect @ ect , michael r brown / lon / ect @ ect ,
fernley dyson / lon / ect @ ect , sally beck / hou / ect @ ect , ted murphy / hou / ect @ ect ,
john sherriff / lon / ect @ ect
subject : re : project doorstep responsibility matrix
thanks for the summary . i was out last week so apologies if my comments
arrive too late . here they are anyway :
1 socrates
i think it inappropriate for me , or anyone in rac for that matter , to have
primary responsibility for this system / project .
but if i were responsible the first thing i would want to know is why this
project , which commenced in may 1998 , as i recall , is still incomplete , given
that it now contains possibly the largest energy derivative position in
history , concentrated in a single commodity with a single counterpart .
2 exhaustive ?
it doesn ' t look like an exhaustive list and i suspect it was not intended to
be so - nevertheless we should ensure it is not viewed as such .
3 symptoms or causes ?
many of the points look like the former , and addressed as they stand will
likely leave us with a band - aid solution which will drop off when pressure is
applied .
in fact many of them look like they are a result of point 5 :
" prioritisation of system projects has resulted in a lack of certain control
functionality . . . "
because that explains partly why models get built and forgotten , confirmation
errors get made , deliveries go astray and trades get missed - usually bright
people are simply too immersed in manual processes to have time to think
about changing the way they work . and , for example , when those people move
on , as they surely will , the institution has no memory of how to do what they
did .
i am still amazed at how much we pay relatively senior people to work on
microsoft excel all day , everyday .
4 overall
i think this is a good exercise if we react to it in the right way . rather
than a list of irritating issues we have to do just enough to justify ticking
off , we should use it as a tool to analyse the way we operate .
as a hypothesis , if most issues stem from point 5 , then i would ask why has
prioritisation of system projects resulted in a lack of certain control
functionality ?
dp
brent a price @ ect
05 / 08 / 2000 11 : 08 am
to : mike jordan / lon / ect @ ect , steve w young / lon / ect @ ect , tani
nath / lon / ect @ ect , mark pickering / lon / ect @ ect , joe gold / lon / ect @ ect , james
new / lon / ect @ ect , richard lewis / lon / ect @ ect , michael r brown / lon / ect @ ect ,
andrew cornfield / lon / ect @ ect , tim davies / lon / ect @ ect , rebecca
millerchip / lon / ect @ ect , kevin sweeney / hou / ect @ ect , pablo
pissanetzky / lon / ect @ ect , gail hill / lon / ect @ ect , eric virro / lon / ect @ ect ,
richard sage / lon / ect @ ect , tim poullain - patterson / lon / ect @ ect , ian
sloman / lon / ect @ ect , david port / market risk / corp / enron @ enron
cc : fernley dyson / lon / ect @ ect , sally beck / hou / ect @ ect , ted
murphy / hou / ect @ ect , john sherriff / lon / ect @ ect
subject : project doorstep responsibility matrix
attached is a responsibility matrix for london - project doorstep action
steps . the listing consists of controls findings , action steps , proposed
timelines , and proposed sponsors and responsibility assignments for the
completion of the action steps . the purpose of this matrix will be to review
and monitor it on an ongoing basis to ensure that items are being
appropriately addressed and completed . please take a moment to review all
sections of the listing and communicate any comments or revisions you may
have to me as soon as possible . we would like to have a final version of
this document in place by may 12 . | scam | en |
Our national bird - the American bald eagle - is an endangered species success story. | toxic | en |
Out of the closet
And here was me thinking you were a plumber from Edinburgh! ;) | toxic | en |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.