text
stringlengths
1
299k
label
stringclasses
4 values
lang
stringclasses
2 values
Disagree. It specifically goes to Young's point in the subsequent paragraph, and hence is highly relevant to the current controversy, and a point of contest between the two sides. The quotation is therefore both relevant and interesting, as well as being illustrative of Darby's point. btw, it occurs to me that we have no information about pro-circ organisations and their activities. The only one I know of is the Gilgal Society, and I don't know much about it. But in the interests of balance we should say something about these, if reliable (and non-pseudonomous) sources can be found. I thought you might have a better idea than me.
toxic
en
" Thank you, but please tell ""Some guy"" that my message to him was not a personal attack, as I noted above. I would do this myself but I can only post on my own talk page given I'm blocked. Please also explain why you believe I lied about anything. "
toxic
en
" :::Unfortunately, ""circumcision rate"" seems ambiguous, leaning toward incidence of new circumcisions rather than prevalence, which is what the WHO is estimating. How about: Percentage of males over 15 who have been circumcised, according to United Nations (WHO/UNAIDS) estimates. (Pale blue, 0%-20%; medium blue, 20%-80%; dark blue, 80%-100%.) Still have to fix the ""no data"" regions, but otherwise that would seem to be a fine addition to the article. "
toxic
en
you have consistantly provoked the other side with your endless efforts in censorship of anything that even remotely disagrees with your view of events that occured during this tragic part of history. By not accepting the immense suffering of Turks under the hand of the Armenians and the foreign occupiers, you are in fact insluting the memory of these people. This, unfortunately has very much been the position of Armenians and their western supporters, the fact that the value attached to the lives of non christians is far less important. This sickening attitude goes on today, you just have to look at dysfunctional Iraq where hundreds of thousands of civilians have been massacred in what conveniantly known as collateral damage. If you had a more open mind and respect for others, maybe this topic would look much better today! If you are going to go back to your whining arguments of how the poor innocent armenians without provocation were massacred, please refrain from doing so because we have danced to the tune so many times already!
toxic
en
I was actually fixing massive problems with your articles. Ciao.
toxic
en
"==Canada 2020== Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Canada 2020, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following: If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Canada 2020 and send an email with the message to ""permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org"". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions. If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Canada 2020 with a link to where we can find that note; If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Canada 2020. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Canada 2020 with a link to the details. It is also important that the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and that it follows Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at Talk:Canada 2020/Temp. Leave a note at Talk:Canada 2020 saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! "
toxic
en
" Katy Perry image Hello, I saw you added an image to the Katy Perry article. Before it can be included, though, it needs to be reviewed as the article is currently a Featured article candidate. You may suggest the image at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Katy Perry/archive1, though an image review has already been done and the file would have to be checked for copyrights and such. (talk / edits) "
toxic
en
Hello. What can be done about secretarian bias on Wikipedia to improve it?
toxic
en
" Philosopher RFC philosopher (from Wiktionary): A person devoted to studying and producing results in philosophy. I am going to make the case that we must call Stefan Molyneux a ""philosopher"" (without qualifiers) in the lead. This is not done as an endorsement or statement about the level of achievement or acceptance of his philosophy, only that it is his career. (Note: Not all of the sources I use below are in the article at present. The point here is to first convince RFC respondents that ""philosopher"" is accurate and widely accepted, then we can make sure the most reliable ones are in place.) Definitions Obviously, each source is going to use slightly different phrasing. Some will call him explicitly a ""philosopher"" or has views on ""philosophy"", but I think you should consider some other phrases given below as equivalent. Using one word ""philosopher"" in the lead sentence covers all of his political, ethical, and theistic specializations in one word, which we then elaborate on later in the article. ""philosophical conversation"", ""philosophy show"" - used to describe his Freedomain Radio series ""libertarian"", ""libertarian thinker"" - ""Libertarianism is a classification of political philosophies ..."" ""anarcho-capitalist"" - ""Anarcho-capitalism ... is a political philosophy..."" ""voluntaryist"" - ""Voluntaryism (or sometimes voluntarism), is a libertarian philosophy..."" ""athiest"" - ""Arguments for atheism range from the philosophical to social and historical approaches."" ""ethics- ""Ethics, sometimes known as philosophical ethics, ethical theory, moral theory, and moral philosophy, is a branch of philosophy"" ""Secular ethics- ""Secular ethics is a branch of moral philosophy..."" Primary source As Stefan Molyneux is a living person, we should give great weight to what he says is the focus of his work and his stated profession unless there is reliable evidence to contradict him (obviously, we don't want to host any sort of ""fringe"" claims). If we are to dispute what he says about himself, though, then we absolutely must have a strong basis for this, or we open Wikipedia to discredit or liability - this is why BLPs are held to strong standards in the first place. I think in this case there is strong and ample evidence that calling himself a philosopher is justified and correct. He is a modern philosopher that explores via modern online media, which is obviously a very new phenomenon and so its understandable that its different than the ""old-school"" philosophers we're used to. Freedomain Radio ""About"" page - ""my Master's Thesis analyzing the political implications of the philosophies "", ""I have been fascinated by philosophy - particularly moral theories - since my mid-teens. I left my career as a software entrepreneur and executive to pursue philosophy full time through my work here at Freedomain Radio. I have written a number of novels as well as many free books on philosophy."" Freedomain Radio (the show that Molyneux hosts) has the tagline ""The Largest and Most Popular Philosophical Conversation in the World""* Molyneux's books show that he is endeavoring to produce tangible written results in the field of philosophy, particularly Universally Preferable Behaviour (UPB): A Rational Proof of Secular Ethics and Against the Gods? A Concise Guide to Atheism and Agnosticism which are two of his more ""deep dives"" into the fundamental philosophies. Strong Atheism: The Case for Evacuating the Middle Ground article Why I Am a Philosopher? video - ""A response to questions about my childhood motivations for pursuing philosophy."" An Introduction to Philosophy - 18-part video course produced by Molyneux describing basic philosophical concepts (Reality, Knowledge, Truth, Gods/Religion, Ethics, and Politics) 8 Unsolvable Philosophical Questions - Solved! video - ""tackles 8 great philosophical questions considered unanswerable."" Proofs for God Destroyed by a Philosophical Atheist video 2011 - A Philosophical Review - ""discusses the major philosophical, political, economic and social developments of 2011"" video ''[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=udLsGJbw4Hs 38 Philosophy Questio
toxic
en
) Added the cats and thanks for the barnstar. '''''' (Contact me + contribs)
toxic
en
oceania please see WP:SEAOFBLUE for reason for revert, happy new year
toxic
en
Obviously Askolnik's comments are uncivil and inflammatory but, more important, they expose his complete inability to express ideas in a neutral manner. He should be recused from contributing to this discussion and article, if not Wikipedia. -
toxic
en
Hi Samudrakula. The version you uploaded was 300 x 180 pixels, and the current version is 177 x 197 pixels, the difference being the removal of empty white space on both the left and the right. Since we are only allowed to have one copy of a non-free file, the old revision was deleted.
toxic
en
":::The 3RR prevents one editor from reverting the definition more than three times. It sound like what you really want is to prevent anyone from editing the article that doesn't agree with your agenda. (For those just joining us, the intro to terrorism hasn't conveyed information for going on three years now. JP, SlimVirgin, and CSloat delete any attempt to define the term, lock non-definitional definitions to the article, block IPs that revert their non-definitions, and call anyone taking a stand against them a ""sockpuppet"" or worse. If you want to see who is actually helping to improve the article, simply take a look through the archives at all the people proposing objective definitions.) "
toxic
en
Ard 515 like dat. Y?
scam
en
" == ""Calif. AG urges court to void gay marriage ban"" == http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081220/ap_on_re_us/gay_marriage_lawsuits Attorney General Jerry Brown has changed his position on the constitutionality of Prop 8. Should this be included in the article? — ]/] "
toxic
en
" Bruce Lee flexing his muscles in the 1972 movie Way of the Dragon. Frontal shot Good day, Shawnc I were wondering about the photo you updated ""Bruce Lee flexing his muscles in the 1972 movie Way of the Dragon. Frontal shot"" I think this is your best work yet this is the picture that truly shows Bruce Lee's physique. I were wondering if you have the same picture but in a bigger resolution or could you tell me where to get it. Thanks, Maikeo"
toxic
en
" Barnstar! The Tireless Contributor Barnstar Since Wikipedia says ""Thank you"" so rarely, I present you this shiny bunch of pixels for your fine work on Latvia- and Baltics-related topics. Please keep up the good work. "
toxic
en
Tập hợp được xác định bởi các số chia dương của một số tự nhiên n là tập hợp các số tự nhiên nhỏ hơn hoặc bằng n mà chia hết cho n.
toxic
vi
Obama's family You were nominally the creator of this and so may be interested in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Family of Barack Obama (2nd nomination).
toxic
en
"Mena appears on lots of goddess-ey webpages, but not in any Roman document I can trace. I think Menstrual Mena is a late 20th century fantasy, part of the ""legend has it..."" syndrome. User:Wetman"
toxic
en
Authority re Coast Guard attempt to close Sturgeon Point lighthouse and remove the Fresnel lens Google the following: Coast Guard Sturgeon Point decommissioning If one looks at the Alcona County Historical Society, which was on point in collecting the 5000 plus signatures (in a town that has 600 people), you might find more. Additionally, there was (at one time) a public comment section with the Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security, where comments were posted protesting the move. Since I've given up editing or contributing to articles, that's the most I'll do. Good luck Stan
toxic
en
Does WikiDon seriously think I'm in the Mafia? Wow, the Mafia barely exists anymore, I don't live in Italy or Sicily, I live in the US, not in New York, so it's just about impossible for me to be involved in the Mafia. All the Mafia Bosses and all the members of the Mafia were either killed or put in jail, so me being in the Mafia is not a possibility.
toxic
en
I usually check articles for vandalism before I edit them, but unfortunately I failed to do so at Eton College. Thanks!
toxic
en
I agree it can still sometimes be used in full... At the beginning of sections, for example. But it is NOT confusing ... It is pretty self-evident, actually.... And should be used in most subsequent places... 140.139.35.250
toxic
en
Hahahaha fabulous observation, I wonder if that's ever happened to her. I'm sure it has in court 😂
adult_sexism
en
::And you're right, the history section of the main Macedonia article is extremely detailed already. It could easily be factored out from there into a subarticle, to be merged with this one.
toxic
en
Problem is this is a list of the record progression, not a list of best miles ever run. Too bad for Ngeny - he broke the old mile record, unfortunately behind El Guerrouj...
toxic
en
Ernie Smith writes to the Wikipdiad Web managers Thanks for the 'typo fix' suggestion. It certainly makes things simpler for me. As for your other admonitions, concerning my responses to this person Hoary, I have been attempting to improve the article via a constructive colloquy with the editor Ƶ§œš¹. This Hoary person appears get his or her orgasmic jollies making asinine slurs and commentary that does not address the subject of Ebonics nor the inconsistencies in his or her logic. I have verbally cleaned this person Hoary’s clock and yet this person Hoary keeps coming back for more. Clearly this person Hoary loves the sadomasochistic verbal exchanges that he or she has invited and is having with me. You would do better to make your admonitions to this Hoary person because I will not tolerate ‘dog whistle’ insults and racial slurs from Hoary, you or anyone else. So you just block my edits all you want. Blocking my edits won’t make the inaccuracies and outright lies that Wikipedia is disseminating on the subject of Ebonics accurate or true. If this person Hoary wants to discuss Black English or African American Vernacular English he or she should take his or her discussion to the Wikipedia Black English or African American Vernacular English section or page. Ebonics is not Black English, African American Vernacular English or any other appellation that implies inherently that the language of descendants of enslaved Niger-Congo Africans is a dialect of English and genetically akin to the Germanic language family to which English belongs. If you do not understand this fact then why was the Wikipedia African Diaspora project initiated? You should have called it the Black Anglo Saxon Diaspora Project instead. But then, there would have to be historical linguistic evidence that Black Anglo Saxons brought Early Modern Black English, African American Vernacular English dialects to colonial America from somewhere in Germanic Europe. Ernie Smith
toxic
en
Oh now I see. Thanks Erick,
toxic
en
" == OK now listen == Its OK.... Let other users decide weather to keep or to delete the image. OK, now i want to use my uploaded file, File:2014iccworldt20.png, in French, Portuguese, Spanish, Dutch Wikipedia. But i don't know any language of them what should i do now ?? Can u see the file and give me description of that image in each of the languages mentioned above ?? Or what should i do ???       "
toxic
en
Nice quote, Joegoodfriend (I did laugh a lot... thanks.) SBHarris must realise that puns, inane jokes, abusive insults and asinine sarcasm against other editors should have no place here, because a lot of people feel strongly about this subject (for/against, or neutral). It might not seem so, but we are very dedicated to completing this article.
toxic
en
" I've asked it here. "
toxic
en
Extension school / High school summer courses aren't really brag-worthy.
toxic
en
Of course, a deletionist such as yourself would see my opinions as unconstructive. All you deletionists are alike, with your hive mind and censorship of opposing viewpoints.4.130.134.233
toxic
en
Christianity is only mentioned three times in the article so the entire article can't have an anti-christian tone. Two out of three times, the mention of Christianity is in reference to Christians and conservatives blaming popular culture for the massacre, which actually did occur (so it deserves mention). The only bias I do notice is the mention of using Cassie Bernall to boast popularity for their faith despite the truth of the matter, but this can be easily changed to an NPOV without deleting the fact.
toxic
en
" Modern Martial Arts Schools Anshu Krista Jacobson is not in the US Hall of Fame, not under her current name or her birth name, Christopher Brooks. Her ""proof"" to Sokeship has also been invalidated along with her Martial Arts Titles and Training.
toxic
en
Go to the library, search for Anthony Blunt, lookup homosexuality in the index, read. Wikipedia is not the end-all.
toxic
en
== Request for update == Hello! Can your bot make update for this page, please? Thank you!
toxic
en
:::I've also found a new 'proposal of ordiance' of 17 december: . Especially the discussion is interesting . That can be included in the article.
toxic
en
":::I had a response here... I don't know what happened to it, if i didn't save it or what. Frustrating! I might find it eventually. The point of it, basically, was: Personally, I would not be the least bit offended if someone said that to me. Up to the ""I am also chastised by..."" part, that is. There, I sympathize, as noone should like to nor deserves to be viewed in black and white. talk 22:09, 2005 Mar 20 (UTC) "
toxic
en
:Slightly over 700 words now. I've de-tagged it since I'm not really sure how much further it can be trimmed...or whether I might have been overzealous.
toxic
en
" Again you offer no alternative reference, just personal opinion and threats. Frankly you are not adding to this conversation unless you can find a citation that gives a different definition for ""city proper"" that we can use, superior to that from the UN currently cited. Until then, we will use the UN definition, with the understanding that cities are defined differently in different countries and this is a compromise. "
toxic
en
"::::::::::::::This is an argument to expand the article (and the others), not split. Splitting is only appropriate when an article grows very long or unwieldy. This article puts itself out there as the article on plants making baby plants via recombination, if we judge by the wikilinks and by the template. (reasoning) I still await your professors, dead or alive, who distinguished plant sexuality from plant sexual reproduction. (reasoning) "
toxic
en
" Hmmm, good point. I've changed it to ""Northumbrian noble"". Fatuorum "
toxic
en
tw transportation contract # 25374 michelle , please ammend contract # 25374 to include the month of february 2001 . thanks , andrew pacheco
scam
en
Cutting-edge research may indeed overturn eventually current consensus, but Wikipedia is not the place to premiere such research per policy of WP:No original research.
toxic
en
" You are again getting me wrong. I just want all the facts to be represented. Anyway I am about to get banned from this topic very soon, so will make my points quickly. There are no Kshatriyas in the world as far as Nambuthiris are concerned. The so called ""Kshatriyas"" and ""Samantans"" which you find in Malabar and among Malabari immigrants to South Kerala, are Nairs who got elevated in caste system. As I have added many sources here, stating that all the Kshatriyas of Kerala are of Nayar origin. I just want to mention that. If you claim that they are not of Nair origin, then please tell me who they are. "
toxic
en
" Peer review , do you ever participate in Wikipedia:Peer review? I think you would be a natural for it! With that in mind, and this is only if you have a free moment of time, would you be able to engage in a Peer Review of an article I have there at Wikipedia:Peer review/Capon Lake Whipple Truss Bridge/archive1. I needed a peer review of this article so that I could nominate it for Featured Article status. I normally wouldn't ask, but it's been lingering on the vine for a while and I wanted to have it reviewed before it passes without one. I know you're probably busy so please do not feel obligated to do so; you were just the first person I thought of! ;) (talk) "
toxic
en
Fansite churn There seem to be a number of anons adding, demoting, and replacing links to various u2 fansites pretty much constantly. This is fairly pointless and unnecessary. Any ideas what to do about it? I'd hate to have to get the article protected. | Talk
toxic
en
Re: [ILUG] Dell GX260 V Redhat 7.3 Quoting Declan Houlihan (deccy@csn.ul.ie): > We're actually investigating switching from Sparc/Solaris to > Intel/Linux. I would much prefer to be using Linux at work > so I'm pushing for this. It definately doesn't help when > you're given a bog standard Dell box and linux won't work > with the graphics card on it. (1) Quibble: For values of "work" limited to X11, not console support. (2) Decent substitute graphics cards with well-tested XFree86 support are cheap. Swap the problematic one out, and save it for some other workstation later. For that matter, somebody with a Win32 system containing such a card might be ecstatic over the opportunity to swap. (3) Welcome to the Linux world, where we've known for... oh... about eleven years that you fail to research chipsets before installation at your peril. -- Cheers, The difference between common sense and paranoia is that common sense Rick Moen is thinking everyone is out to get you. That's normal; they are. rick@linuxmafia.com Paranoia is thinking they're conspiring. -- J. Kegler -- Irish Linux Users' Group: ilug@linux.ie http://www.linux.ie/mailman/listinfo/ilug for (un)subscription information. List maintainer: listmaster@linux.ie
scam
en
I thought I was the only one that caught this. At first I was thinking she wanted a threesome.
adult_sexism
en
Gun rights and double jeopardy Can anyone give one liberal democracy that doesn't give it citizens the right to bear arms, and doesn't have the double jeopardy rule? PS: Don't say Europeans don't have the right to bear arms, 'cause I'm Belgian myself ;-)
toxic
en
Favonian drinks Djathinkimacowboy's love juice - and makes Salvio watch jealously
toxic
en
:Thank you ever so much for fixing those, I do not often come across image rationales and the specificity of the article had escaped my attention. I will try and look at the ref problems tomorrow as I am off for the night in a moment.
toxic
en
(UTC) | page2 = Dance Moms (season 2) | diff2 = https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Dance_Moms_episodes&diff;=612517001&oldid;=612514854 | date2 = 11 June 2014 at 16:25
toxic
en
Link worked fine for me too: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A18709-2005Mar8.html
toxic
en
photo is of poor quality
toxic
en
Attention brought to administrators here and here.  Vesey Review me!
toxic
en
"—Preceding unsigned comment added by • 03:56, 9 April 2009"
toxic
en
"Please do not add commercial links — or links to your own private websites — to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. See the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. — ([ TALK]) 10:14, Dec. 18, 2005"
toxic
en
:Well I don't have any sources, but I remember reading somewhere a while back that Montreal was very interested in grabbing the All-Star Game, the World Juniors and other hockey related events (entry draft? unsure..) in order to hold this grand bunching of stuff in order to honor the 100th anniversary. I dunno if the league is fully behind it as you claim, but I definately know the Montreal organization would very much like it.
toxic
en
" I think the thing to do is have ""Las Vegas"" the city as the primary article, and include in that all urbanized adjacent areas that are not part of another city. This covers the Strip, the Airport, Palms and most big off-strip casinos and all the county islands. BTW, county islands are not an indication that a place is not part of the community, but an indication that the annexation is corrupt. I think that would cover things well and address the fact that Henderson and NLV are not quite as ""Las Vegas"" as the strip. FWIW, it seems that Las Vegas is unusual for a primary city of a metro area to not be surrounded on all sides by suburbs. This is probably why other cities haven't had this argument.  Talk to me "
toxic
en
Did you have another breakdown? Read your posts back you are hysterical woman. Take your meds & leave the cider alone.
adult_sexism
en
[ping|Ricky81682] Check this very recent Iranian Fars News Agency source, pretty much sums up Khamenei's view on Israel.
toxic
en
I would request someone to put a different picture of the Kachera as it does not look like the Kachera that is traditionally worn in Sikhism.
toxic
en
october 2000 availabilities this appears to be the first one . thanks , bev - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - forwarded by beverly beaty / hou / ect on 09 / 26 / 2000 08 : 28 am - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - enron capital & trade resources corp . from : " steve holmes " 09 / 21 / 2000 05 : 19 pm to : cc : subject : october 2000 availabilities attached are the october 2000 availabilities for devon energy . i will notify you of any updates as soon as they become availabilie . thanks , steve - enronavailsl 000 . xls
scam
en
First of all, I know that it's free to edit. I've heard that a million times and I meant to say my article as in my edits, not my personal article. Second, I said I'm American because you claim you're from London, and I figure that there's different things you see in London that are different from what Americans see, thus making you have negative feelings for the edit (not sure if my theory is right, I'm just thinking that). Third, have you ever seen Charlie Countryman? I remember every moment in that movie and perfectly plotted it on the article, despite a few misunderstandings. If you could give a list of what I screwed up then I would understand. On top of all that, I DON'T want to argue about this, I just want to deal with my more important personal issues and go back to watching 24. So if we both don't like each other's edits, I have a solution that HAS to work for both of us. Please deliver your feedback after you see the edit. - Theironminer 4:52 PM, 16 June, 2014
toxic
en
Newsletter draft ready Hi Dank, I have prepared an initial draft of our drive wrap-up newsletter at Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Newsletters/April 2012; if you could find the time to check it over before it goes out, that would be super. Thanks.
toxic
en
" == Why a Separate Article? == Why is this article separated from Omaha Nebraska? It is good that it is in that it is so bad an article that it could only detract from the main Omaha article. And who changed the motto to ""To sizzle and pop?"" Undoubtedly one of my Omaha neighbors. Behave yourselves, children! In my opinion as a Wikipedian (rather than as an Omahan) this article should be taken down, it is, except for a few factual sentences, nothing but a tirade against the police department. "
toxic
en
kghkghkgk,ghkftgmfkj fhhhjfjfhdjfj fgzjfzj fzjfzjfzjfgjfgzjfgj jjfjgf
toxic
en
Kakapo Kakapo seems to be a pretty decent article. I can try and read through it carefully from the viewpoint of a general reader (I don't have any specialist knowledge), but it will probably have to be in a day or two (I'll be away tomorrow). 03:31, 31 Jul 2004 (UTC)
toxic
en
" ==tactics== so the russians for instance could use nukes and the mass media to effectively checkmate the americans, the cold war has been won i think, these tactics are comin sooner or later and its no stopping it, the russians need merely if they get out of hand again say all right we are using thermonuclear devices to destroy ur forward offensive positions, ur aircraft carriers, thats all we are doing we are letting the world judge the situation after we have done that, u americans will have a hard time launching offensive warfare now after ur loss of aeroplane support, there were several such tactics u see, people had not thought of them is all, then finally came along weapons experts such as not seen before, that could apply themselves to many fields, including weapons systems, all past warfare tactics went thru the drain, people were dumbfounded, it created a severe situation once the weapons experts advanced to high enough degree, there was widespread panic amongst the old elite, they had no control ovber some of these experts is the thing, one after another high level weapons experts began maneuvering...several were killed of course, but it just kept coming they kept doing it and the old elite was really really panicing and well well, some of thems was OK, and some of thems could hire a gang to delete stuff on wikipedia, or try to privatize, but of course it all got around soon enough u know that one its so good all those hackers out there and u know theys getting it and so boom and so the russians of course also requested politely, that the americans move all bases out of germany...all bases out of germany ur airfields u use to support all ur forward positions... all bases out of Deutschland or Fuck u boom we blow those bases up! we are eliminating ur offensive potential, we will not strike USA, its out of the target list, but blowing up some cities in Deutschland isnt off the target list its not much worries to us....... we may consider handing u some other area, for some base, but deutschland no way and get em out or boom we blow those fucking bases up! elect who u want, make ur own little rules for ur own recognized lawful territory, but get ur fucking bases out of germany or boom we blow em up!!! boom done there gone yes property in europe is nice amerikanskyes, yes its pricey, but from now on ur just gonna have to think a little harder about how to aquire foreign property, ur gonna need to turn some ideas into cash, and then ur gonna have to pay cash for the property, its the way things kinda work, its works reasonably, it keeps u on ur toes u know when u actually have to make and invent things to buy property instead of just, well, well going over and...well we all know what yall did and thats that —Preceding unsigned comment added by and then the prisoner list, we have a list of millions of prisoners u must release! we even have a list of millions of United States citizens being held agsint their will unlawfully and illegally! —Preceding unsigned comment added by in addition, until such time as these conditions are met, several cartels are shutting things down, for instance............... in the United States:"
toxic
en
" Much as it may disappoint you, Mr Merkey, I am not a troll, nor am I a ""sockpuppet"", whatever that might be. I came to Wikipedia to get some research info into my own cherokee lineage (which, as you may be able to guess, does not trace back to anyone on the Dawes Roll), and found you embarking on a political crusage to remove the very information that I was seeking. Hence my registration."
toxic
en
:We've had the same problem with Prince Harry of Wales, mostly revolving around this policy. I expect much trouble might follow (although hopefully not as much as others), but I would hope that we could collectively let the dust settle for a while, and in particular, wait until Catherine herself announces how she would like to be referred to as. (Sorry, Winston).
toxic
en
:ah, the good old University of Life!
toxic
en
" Jack, is it a misrepresentation for you to write more than 500,000 nucleotide base pairs, or should you write 582 base pair. Lets start watching ""RNA world"" page too. "
toxic
en
Amazing... I will ask, but one more time Ma'am, do not post on my talk page again. If you do so, I will ask for assistance from an adminstrator. I hope I will not have to do that, though. Good Day to you, Ma'am. -
toxic
en
Silly Steve Nash‎ edits Stop it.
toxic
en
temp forecast model . xls this is the file with our city temperature weights .
scam
en
" *Comment: I made the merge request, but Jimbo, who knows a lot more than I do about how to do stuff, speedy-deleted it. '''''''''' "
toxic
en
" Being back Thanks for noticing and your warm words earlier. Have yet to get back into the swing of things, but I'm glad to see so many of my old friends are still here. Happy editing. talk "
toxic
en
yet more arrogance from another jumped up editor who thinks he 'owns'' Wikipedia. How sad your life must be to have nothing but Wiki editing.
toxic
en
Thanks for your note. I'm afraid that I can't locate the deleted article, because I don't have a precise idea of the title you gave it; that means I don't know if you asserted a copyright on the talk page of the article or not. However, I understand what you're getting at; the Wikipedia policy that governs this situation can be found at this location. If you follow the directions there, that should resolve any possible copyright problems. Be sure that the article meets our other policies you can find a refresher here and you should be good to go. If you need further assistance, leave me another note. talk
toxic
en
Stop this right now. You have crossed a line here. It is one thing to discuss what best fits as an article title, it's quite another to be claiming that if you prefer one version over another you're disrespecting the victim or his family.
toxic
en
REDIRECT Talk:U.S. Post Office–Yuma Main
toxic
en
Oppose. These early Austins provided the base for development of (in competition with Morris) Britain's biggest car brand.
toxic
en
I agree. The references marked as questionable are actually from very unreliable Livestrong articles, despite being cited like books. I looked through WikiBlame and noticed that the entire health benefits part was written as part of a school assignment over the summer of 2012. None of those editors are present to defend their work, and I'm not sure what to do. Opinions? I'll wait before removing the entire thing.
toxic
en
customer profiling meeting - amendment bob shults is scheduled to be in atlanta , ga on the 17 th of march and would like to reschedule the " customer profiling meeting " , to tuesday , march 24 st at t 1 : 30 p . m . , location to be announced . if you are unable to attend please let me know . lydia 3 - 9975
scam
en
" Plato not ""part of the Socratic entourage"" or ""inner circle""? At the beginning of the Plato and Socrates section of the article, someone had said, ""Plato made himself seem as though he were part of the Socratic entourage but never says so explicitly. ... In the Apology, Plato distances himself from the inner circle."" I believe this involves a misunderstanding of how Plato represents himself in the Apology. I would not be prepared to say that Plato considered himself ""part of Socrates' entourage"" or Socrates' ""inner circle""; but that's only because it's not clear what whoever wrote this part of the article means by ""entourage"" or ""inner circle"". Is it made clear elsewhere in Plato's dialogues who did belong to the ""inner circle""? So far as I know, Plato never mentions an ""inner circle"". But he certainly portrays himself in the Apology as one of Socrates' young devoted followers, in quite explicit terms in fact. Given this fact, I think it's simply misleading to suggest that Plato somehow went out of his way to ""distance himself"" from Socrates or Socrates' devoted followers. So I've edited this part of the article accordingly, including textual citations. Comment if you wish. "
toxic
en
#Israeli-Arab secret contacts to block Land Day marches >>>peaceful march my arse more #arablies #musiterror ...#israel [URL]
adult_sexism
en
::::::::I agree the incidents section should go, define the incidents exactlly, most put (If not all) are what israel did which makes it a bit one sided.16:56 31 January 2009 (UTC)
toxic
en
ena it louise , i need to bring this to close . i am going to decompose beth ' s group into a number of smaller units , leaving the most important areas in ena , namely gas / power front and back office . i am going to leave anthony running ees , but need someone who can work well with anthony on developing the strategy for the new longer term solutions , as well as what he is trying to achieve in the short term . the final candidates are steve stock , everett plant , and as possible late entry john paskin ( although he doesn ' t know this yet and i have him tagged to run corporate systems ) . from a collaboration perspective i am leaning towards stocky . we have all spoken with everett and are impressed with his ' gloss ' . i ' m just not sure he is the right person to give the ' crown jewels ' to , my gut tells me he is good at managing up , but may not be the best collaborative team member ( and i need that ) . let mk know what you think thanks oh , and thanks for the baseball the other night , we had fun . mark pickering chief technology officer enron net works , llc _ _ _ _ _
scam
en
The difference between the two is also obvious. On Killing Lincoln, O'Reilly was specifically responding to the Ford Theater's list of historical inaccuracies which caused the Theater to bar the sale of the book. On Killing Patton, O'Reilly isn't responding anything in particular, just issuing a generic 'the far left loons hate me' whine.-Jimintheatl
toxic
en
" BLPN Your input at the Michael Wines section of WP:BLPN would be appreciated. (smalltalk) "
toxic
en
" I believe I got the issues. I fixed the citation problem on the first one and just removed that last line, since I can't really find a citation for it. Thanks for the review! I'm hoping to take it to FA/FL, but I've had trouble getting people to respond lately. (Talk) "
toxic
en
Suspected Sockpuppeteer Turns Out to Be a Human== Shocking news break. It turns out that the person who originally supplied the information in ISM is me! A real person.... not a 'sock puppeteer.' There are no socks and no puppets. Just a real person who thought that a business was significant enough to warrant a pace on Wikipedia. Someone who actually understands the business he is in, unlike the editors, who have no experience in the field whatsoever. It turns out- or so we can surmise, that there are lots of people who want to learn about this company. Oh no! This can't be! It's a business... not an encyclopedic fact! But an encyclopedia like Wikipedia should include everything in the world. otherwise, why does it exist? Encyclopedia Britannica and the Oxford Encyclopedia are perfectly sufficient. Geekish editors have said that listing this company is 'blatant advertising.' Yet other advertising companies, like Modernista, BBDO, DDB, Ogilvy, etc. are all here... blatant advertising. So, how big does a company have to be to be listed on Wiki? The answer- there is no answer. It's all up to the whims of people who have no knowledge nor experience in business, who call themselves Carbuncle, Smeff, Dongfart, and the rest. This is surely detrimental to the Wiki. Why do people have such a Pyongyang attitude towards this? The very idea of limiting what is shown here- censoring pure facts arbitrarily- is against the very idea of a global Wiki. The great big idea is that this site is developed by the people of the world, and includes all the things that the published encyclopedias, which have been around for hundreds of years, do not or cannot include. To my mind, and all the other sane, normal people of the world, this is all ridiculous. Please cite the arguments of What Wiki is Not and all the rest. It is a shortcut to thinking. And clearly there is very little thinking here. I have had repeated emails from people around the world asking why they cannot find ISM on Wikipedia, and many from people who either wanted to add information on the company or were looking for information for research. Everyone was rebuffed. What kind of person would do this- what kind of person would sit in their little room, hiding information from others, and trying to keep reality away at any cost? Sock Puppets? Suspicious users? Legal threats? What kind of cowardly fool says these things without simply engaging in a dialogue with the person who originally wrote the article and who always- ALWAYS - asked for editor input and support? Go on- look at the history. You will see that editor input was always taken at first, despite the fact that all editors here are wholly unqualified to make a decision on this subject. When asked to explain themselves, no one had the nous to do so. Delicious Carbuncle, BlueBoy, Todd1, Fisher Queen, etc. All refused to answer for their actions. Cowards and buffoons who have no sense, courage, nor intelligence. Anyone who makes an attack on another person, as these 'editors' have, and runs away without facing the person they have attacked, is not deserving of their powers. I am now convinced that Wikipedia, despite it's noble origins, is just a place for fools to feel power in a world where they are unable to have any in reality. Go ahead and add your ridiculous little code to me and my site. You have no argument and have no intelligence- if you think you do, face me like a real human- talk, discuss, and the rest. Or be a true Wiki editor and make a stupid, sarcastic comment and run away... hiding... and never respond to your comments. Cheers, Kevin Nicholas Known as kmnicholas or ismboston and, yes, I live in England- of you bothered to ask and my mobile phone number is 07791 410 501 so stop making out that I'm hiding or tricking anyone. I'm, here. And I'll meet you, face to face, any time. ==
toxic
en
Re: ActiveBuddy How is this any different from attaching an Infobot or A.L.I.C.E through licq's console-hook? People have been doing that for years, and for over a decade in IRC and the MUDs. ... and the one thing I think we've learned in all that time is that, as a help-desk, it doesn't work. People just don't like talking to robots, especially when the robots, once confused, become imbeciles. I think the humans may feel cheated, deceived and tricked when they discover, as with the Seattle answer, that they are talking to a machine; there's no real intelligence behind that simulated-friendly and therefore empty 'thx'. AIML is clever and cute, but for /practical/ applications as a first line of technical support? It's been tried over and over, and while I /also/ think that it /should/ work, for the most part, people won't use it. What's worse, as we make the NL processing more and more clever, it only means it fails more dramatically; ALICE doesn't just stumble a bit, it starts to drool. And ALICE is the best we have. Like a Dalek: All very impressive when things are going well, but all it takes to betray the chicken-brain inside is a towel over it's ill-placed eye, or a spin off the metal surface ;) In all the prolog-based NL database query systems of the 1980's and other later chatterbot helpdesk projects like Shallow Red, even simpler tries like Ask Jeeves, people very quickly know they're talking to a robot, and the queries anneal to short, truncated and terse database-like verb-noun or just noun-keyword requests. People are just too quick to adapt, and too impatient to forgive a clunky interface, and for now, especially when the /average/ computer user still can't type more than maybe 5-10wpm, NL is a painfully slow clunky interface. Put it this way: Would you login, wake the bot and ask for the Seattle weather, or would you do as we /all/ do and just click the weather icon sitting there on your desktop? Just for fun, here's an interesting conversation between Shallow Red, ALICE and Eliza as they decide to play the Turing Game: http://www.botspot.com/best/12-09-97.htm -- Gary Lawrence Murphy - garym@teledyn.com - TeleDynamics Communications - blog: http://www.auracom.com/~teledyn - biz: http://teledyn.com/ - "Computers are useless. They can only give you answers." (Picasso)
scam
en
== Democratic State == Perhaps the lead of this article could include that Lebanon is a democratic state?
toxic
en
Abi 17:45, 9 February 2014
toxic
en