text stringlengths 1 299k | label stringclasses 4
values | lang stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|---|
He told me his DJ, DJsuckafree took the pic. | toxic | en |
[USER] It is tyranny. If she is elected I fear for my nation. With Obama I knew disaster and problems but believed America could make it through., Not so with Hillary. | adult_sexism | en |
":::I would somewhat agree with LauraHale on the point that GAs are not really Good Articles. I have seen some comments on article talk pages post-GA or during PR or FAC showing discontent on the GA review that was done. Some key points on the topic are missing or language is poor or some other sorts. I have recently also been in DYKNs where they felt as good as FACs with all grilling of critical points. But i do not understand LH's opposition for a new slot of GAs on Main Page. In case LH has doubts against the GA review process i would suggest that GARs should also be done by multiple editors. Single editor doing a GA review could sometimes be a reason for missing or overlooking some factors in the article. I have seen multiple editors getting involved in DYKNs but hardly seen that happening on GAs. §§§§ {T/C}
" | toxic | en |
The basket's gettin full so I might be by tonight | scam | en |
"
Yeah well, I didn't appreciate Kelapstick's snide ""you've been here for years and should know better bullshit"". As I made clear I am not an admin and can't move articles over redirects. I can't nominate an article for deletion in userspace, it tells you it has to be an article space. I can't have a redirect deleted when it's contentious. So I did my fucking best and he can take his snide comments and shove em. I had to do another AfD and it's still not right because it doesn't show the previous ones. It's a colossal waste of my fucking time and I don't appreciate it. The article has been moved all over the freaking place wily nily including into my userspace where someone who is not welcome on my talkpage shouldn't mucking about. The consensus for the article is clear as it was in 2012. So this whole escapade is an exercise in futility. And then we have your other buddy Hafspajen jumping in with his nasty innuendos and repeated accusations of bad faith. So you want to rein in the incivility? Go for it Drmies. But don't get made at me for telling the truth. When you guys create a mess and involve yourself in it and muck it up, and you get stuck doing mopping I don't break a sweat. Cry me a river. I don't create articles in bad faith EVER and I don't edit in bad faith EVER and I try to keep a sense of humor about all the attacks I face, but I don't like it. So if I hurt your feelings, good. You deserve it. Show your fellow lowly editors a little respect in the future and don't act like such arrogant wp:dicks. Does that article still exist? I remember some fascinating debate about it. I'm sorry if you have to eat your own pudding on occasion. Next time order something else. " | toxic | en |
Dude just go to venues that play music you actually enjoy. | adult_sexism | en |
"
There is little point changing one page when you are running a bot job to change many. "" well sort of but the whole point of preferring MMM over MMM. was because of the need to abbreviate for confined places and the use of three letters for ascetic reasons in tables (the dot obviously takes up one extra space). In the case of references in a reference section there is no reason to prefer MMM over MMM. because the space is not confined, so if you are going to change them then change the to the full month, which is in line with the intent of the instructions. " | toxic | en |
Image copyright problem with Image:Stella Hudgens, 10.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Stella Hudgens, 10.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ()(Talk) | toxic | en |
Perhaps then, the way out is to find a WP:RS that says that these Christian sources may be inflating the figure. Then the article could quote the higher figure (some Christian sources say that the proportion of Christians may be as high as 15% but according to XXXX these numbers may be inflated). Or, if the source (the one claiming that the christian sources are unreliable) then it would be ok to drop the higher number and relegate the info to the religion sub-article. However, failing an external [WP:RS]] confirmation of the motivations of these 'Christian' sources, it is WP:OR to state that 'it's in the interest of these Christian sources to overstate their numbers'. At best, it is as speculative as 'the Egyptian government allegedly being interested in promoting a lower percentage of Christians because of its troubles with Islamic fundamentalists', which, BTW, I did not say is true or even my view, I presented it as a counter hypothesis to the speculation of biased christian sources. The point is that we can't speculate about motives because we don't do WP:OR. We need to look for external sources to guide us on the veracity of information out there. If we can't show that a source is unreliable, and the source is reasonable, we should present their statistics with the appropriate caveats. (sniff out my socks) | toxic | en |
mojave schedule vols
michelle
i have taped the detail for 9 / 28 / 00 to my monitor - i couldn ' t locate you fax # and it was too exhaustive to type - i forgot about the third party info . i will not be here tomorrow but can be reached at 832 - 754 - 4737 .
thanks
richard | scam | en |
oh wow a block im so scared. <sarcasm. stop getting all butt hurt bro. your threats don't faze me. you're just wasting your time getting all shook up over nothing | toxic | en |
"
is a scientifically proven epitome of an Arsehole (stretched and itching...) THAT's WHY he whines and bitches so pathetically on Wikipaedia
Female masturbation techniques are quite numerous and perhaps more varied than those of males. They are influenced by a number of factors and personal preferences. Techniques include stroking or rubbing of the vulva, especially the clitoris, with the middle, index and/or second fingers. Sometimes one or more fingers may be inserted into the vagina to repeatedly stroke the frontal wall of the vagina where the g-spot is located. (Studies done by Masters & Johnson, however, have shown that only about 10% of women actually have orgasms through vaginal stimulation alone.) [citation needed] Masturbation aids such as a vibrator, dildo or Ben Wa balls can also be used to stimulate the vagina and clitoris. Many women will caress the breasts or stimulate a nipple with the free hand. Anal stimulation is also enjoyed by some because of the thousands of sensitive nerve endings located there.
Lubrication is sometimes used during masturbation, especially when penetration is involved, but this is by no means universal and many women find their natural lubrication sufficient—some even produce more lubricant alone than with a partner, though the reasons for this seem to be primarily psychological.
Women may masturbate in the bathtub, shower and hot tub, sometimes including the use of warm running water to stimulate the clitoris. Common positions include lying on back or face down, sitting, squatting, or even standing. Lying face down, one may straddle a pillow, the corner or edge of the bed, a partner's leg or some scrunched-up clothing and ""hump"" the vulva and clitoris against it. Standing up, the corner of an item of furniture, or even a washing machine, can be used to stimulate the clitoris through the labia and clothing.
A vibrating duck. By de-dramatising the nature of a vibrator, this kind of toy has gained wider acceptance.
Some reach orgasm merely by crossing their legs tightly and clenching the muscles in their legs, which creates pressure on the genitals. This can potentially be done in public without observers noticing. Some prefer to use only pressure, applied to the clitoris without direct contact, for example by pressing the palm or ball of the hand against underwear or other clothing.
A few women can orgasm spontaneously, after experiencing prior sexual arousal, due to intellectual stimulation alone, for instance listening to certain pieces of music. Often, these mental triggers have associations with previous instances of arousal and orgasm. Some women claim to be able to orgasm spontaneously by force of will alone, but that ability, if it exists at all, may not strictly qualify as masturbation as no physical stimulus is involved.
Those who have difficulty reaching orgasm through sexual intercourse may find it easier to achieve an orgasm through masturbation. Sometimes sex therapists will recommend that female patients take time to masturbate to orgasm, especially if they have not masturbated before " | toxic | en |
cuiaba models
hey ding . if you recall , we looked at southern cone during july , as this
was the feedback that we got from our presentation in late may . the cuiaba
gas and power volumes may be found in several different places since there is
more than one model . the models do not necessarily agree with each other . i
have attached a few models that should contain the necessary info . i also
have a summary sheet template that was to be attached in maps . enjoy .
- kevin k . | scam | en |
:I add input, further references and balance. You just revert. | toxic | en |
"
I MUST object to this. When I originally put forth my version of MastCell and Nightscream's ""argument"", I was told I was not addressing the article, but just babbling on the issue. So, I defended myself that this is directly related to the article and its POV. Then, I was told, that somehow paraphrasing the argument used to push POV is somehow an ""attack"" on the editors!! And that I ""misattributed"" them. Fine, I'll deal with that later. Okay, so let me get this straight. People push a POV on an article. They use specific arguments to justify pushing their POV (the endless bickering over ""scientific consensus"", ""scientific community"", ""facts"", ""who is a scientist"", just read the last 3 years' discussion pages). I come onto this discussion page, and I point out how pathetic their arguments used to push their POV are. When I do this, I am told I am ""not addressing the article to improve it"", and that I'm ""attacking the editors"" (!!) and that if I continue to do this, I will be banned. Whatever. Nightscream said: ""I made none of the ""arguments"" you attributed to me, nor do I recall MastCell doing so either."" But you said: ""It indicates that it is referring exclusively to those who follow the Scientific Method, and not any ol' Tom, Dick and Harry with a contrary opinion and a webpage."" It does not take a ph.d. to figure out that by ""any ol' Tom, Dick, and Harry with a contrary opinion and a webpage"" you mean Duesberg, Perth, David Crowe, AIDS Wiki, and Virusmyth, and all the people associated with them. Hence, by your own words, you are saying that all these people, the ""Tom, Dick, and Harry""'s, are not following the ""scientific method"" and are thus not part of your ""scientific community"". And this is my point. You DEFINE anyone who rejects the hypothesis as necessarily not following scientific method, hence not a member of the scientific community, then claim there's 100% or near 100% agreement in the scientific community that HIV causes AIDS. It's a completely circular argument. 69.45.178.143 " | toxic | en |
"
== Didi Hill ==
That particular comment about baseless accusations was in response to ""It is rumored that she was prostitute."" which was included at the end of the article. It was not meant as an attack towards you and I'm sorry of you thought it was one. - | " | toxic | en |
"
== Culture: Music section ==
I just did some editing on the section recently added about Culture of the Gen Xers. I think there were some inaccuracies within (""It's Raining Men"" was out before 1983, and Gen Xers generally weren't into the Ramones in the mid-70s as they were really pretty young and the Ramones and Sex Pistols weren't receiving any pop radio airplay (in the US, at least), and the separation of ""Baby Busters"" from Xers makes no sense; Busters are Xers, and the earliest Busters were only 10 in 1975, so they didn't drive the early punk movement either). I am not sure it's a good idea to just list all the music that was popular from 1975-present; that could just end up getting terribly unwieldy. I think it would help to make that specifically related to Generation X more clearly than it is now. If anyone has any ideas for ways to do that, by all means, please edit. I am thinking about ways to improve that section myself. | " | toxic | en |
WPCD
Hi. Hope (and trust) the weather is a bit better where you are. Several things:
the 0.5 plus images has been grabbed and put up here: http://wikipedia-release-version-0.5.fixedreference.org/ and our 2007 list (which is much longer) is at
http://2007-wikipedia-cd-selection.fixedreference.org/wp/index/alpha.htm
Also to let you know about Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/2006_Wikipedia_CD_Selection. The current marginal majority to move the page to Wikipedia space. This makes some sense but practically far fewer people will ever see the CD releases if we always put them in project place (the internal search on Wikipedia excludes project pages) and I think there is enough notability now to make the case... talk | toxic | en |
=Go to hell= | toxic | en |
charter review - final version
attached is the final version of the charter review for our meeting with skilling tomorrow . i intended to get this out sooner , but preparations for our energy tech conference tomorrow kept me fairly occupied this afternoon .
i need to go through one last time with my calculator , but do not anticipate there will be any additional revisions . i need to speak at the conference from 8 : 30 to 9 : 00 a . m . tomorrow and will come directly to the 33 rd floor thereafter . i believe we meet at 9 : 45 a . m . with skilling .
if you need to reach me this evening , my cell number is ( 713 ) 854 5232 .
regards ,
mlm | scam | en |
I can't imagine how many more times we will see the same ads in another instant kitchen round. I am now boycotting the products. #mkr | cyber | en |
Simpsons cast members
Please stop removing my edits (Cloris Leachman, Larry King, etc regarding Simpsons cast members. Look at the history page for C. Leachman and the CfD . Note that all other TV shows/film categories have been renamed to cast members to include all guest/one-off actors. | toxic | en |
== To Opp2 ==
Other then the fact that your English is hard you follow, your Japanese point of view is pretty hard to stand. This article is the work of several dozens of people of each more than half are neutral non-Japanese/Korean. Your accustion of editers being Koreans, and calling scholars stupid, no matter how unlogical they may sound to you, is childish behavior. I suggest that you first straighten out your facts, clean up your English. - General Tiger | toxic | en |
oto
i will be out of the office from 3 / 15 thru 3 / 25 on vacation . if you have any
questions mike olsen ext - 35796 will be the point person . my desk will be
handle by :
bob c . 3 - 6101 bmar
create and send noms
bridge back - hpl / hpl & ena
mike 3 - 5796 carhtage hub
devon
bmar ( back up )
hpl pools
bp - amoco
centana ( storage & hpl meter 7001 )
tom a 3 - 6224 tufco
path hpl / ena | scam | en |
Just a reminder
As per Wikipedia:Linking#Chronological_items, editor should avoid linking the date including year, month and day. | toxic | en |
"
BI, you said you wanted to talk
At the bottom of the lead section you have written:
""Its promoter speculated in 1994 that the skyhook concept could be cost competitive with what is realistically thought to be achievable using a space elevator, but the skyhook is not competitive with other rotating tether concepts. In addition, the rotating skyhook is in fact deemed ""not engineeringly feasible using presently available materials"".""
Regarding: In addition, the rotating skyhook is in fact deemed ""not engineeringly feasible using presently available materials""
That statement appears to come from Ref [3] on page 10. The full quote is
""If the mass of the tether alone started to exceed 200 times the mass of the payload,
then that was an indication the particular scenario being considered was not engineeringly
feasible using presently available materials, although the application might become feasible in
the near future as better materials become available with higher tensile strengths at higher
operational temperatures.""
It then goes on to say
""As we shall see, presently available commercial materials will suffice to make the HASTOL
tethers needed. The primary message we want to leave with the Reader is:
“We don't need magic materials like ‘Buckminster-Fuller-carbon-nanotubes’ to make
the space tether facility for a HASTOL system. Existing materials will do.”""
So it would appear that you misread your reference. The tether mass of 200 times mass of the payload mass is the upper limit to the problem. Systems where the tether mass is less than 200 times the payload mass can be built with ""presently available commercial materials.""
To further reinforce this the Conclusion to the report states
""The fundamental conclusion of the Phase I HASTOL study effort is that the concept is
technically feasible. We have evaluated a number of alternate system configurations that will
allow hypersonic air-breathing vehicle technologies to be combined with orbiting, spinning space
tether technologies to provide a method of moving payloads from the surface of the Earth into
Earth orbit. For more than one HASTOL architecture concept, we have developed a design
solution using existing, or near-term technologies. We expect that a number of the other
HASTOL architecture concepts will prove similarly technically feasible when subjected to
detailed design studies. The systems are completely reusable and have the potential of drastically
reducing the cost of Earth-to-orbit space access.""
Regarding: ""but the skyhook is not competitive with other rotating tether concepts."" and
""A 2000 Boeing report on the possibillity of combining skyhooks with hypersonic planes concluded that ""In general, the non-spinning tether HyperSkyhook concept does not look competitive with the spinning tether concepts."".""
The full quote is:
""HyperSkyhook
In 1995 Zubrin proposed the “Hypersonic Skyhook” as a solution to the mismatch between
the attainable atmospheric speeds of a hypersonic airplane and the orbital speeds of space tethers.
Since the orbital speed of the space tether decreases with increasing altitu | toxic | en |
can't even open it on the blackberry. Too big. | toxic | en |
Seltzer was introduced nationally in 1883 so probably not considering the old fashion predates this. But what do I know, i'm not even valuable enough to contribute without being reverted. | toxic | en |
Taking Chopa as an example, in the Discography section the album information for each of their 3 albums is pretty much the same thing that can be found on each individual album's page. The albums are already linked to. So what I am suggesting is removing what is duplicative and migrating anything that does not appear for each individual album onto that respective album's article page. In the end, you would be left with a Discography section listing all 3 albums.
I also noticed the Notes on selected pieces section; this section be taken out of the Chopa article and appear in the pages for all 3 albums containing only those notes relevant for that particular album. As it appears right now, the reader cannot tell where a song appears unless he/she scrolls up and searches. It would be more relevant to have the specific information pertaining to songs appearing on particular albums on the respective album's pages. | toxic | en |
John Sherry & Richard Sherry
The article needs to make it clearer what are actual facts and what are assertions made by those who have written about them. | toxic | en |
"own books. Moreover, those books don't appear to have any independent notability per WP:N and WP:V. NawlinWiki (talk) "". Please respond in much more detailed and sensible argument and valid reasons to the two detailed replies to you, as to why you, with such hast and vigour, tagged for speedy deletion the article of the seven volumes of Triumph of Truth (Who S Watching The Watchers?). Please be kind enough to also provide your reply on your own talk page (This page, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NawlinWiki&action;=edit) and please also explain why, when I was editing the original article in the SandBox section, the drafts that I worked hard on, started, after a few hours of working on the page, to disappear every 12 seconds, and the Wikipedia Policy on top of the SandBox page states that the edits on the SandBox pages will be removed every 12 hours, not every 12 seconds. Then I go back to the Sandbox page to have another try, to create the article again, and there is a message typed by yourself, being the admin editor on duty at the time checking new edits and new articles being drafted, in the edit section, that ""the edits on this page will be removed every 12 seconds"". The meaning behind this message was clear. No matter what I was to write in the SandBox edit page and/or in an actual article on a main Wikipedia page, you and those who you are fronting for have already decided to speadily delete the edit and/or article. The message is clear that the subject matter that involves the now destroyed the seven volumes of Triumph of Truth (Who S Watching The Watchers?), that are not for sale, as they simply do not exist anymore, but their original existence can be easily verified by speaking to the main political historian that was in charge of the ordering of the seven volumes of Triumph of Truth (Who S Watching The Watchers?) at the JS Battye Library, also by search in all the references and links that have been provided suporting the article, as well as reading the article on the Old Boys Melbourne High Schol page that has been on the internet for over 12 year, (Please See: Google search on Stephen Carew-Reid MHSOBA 1907-2009 : Luncheon Club - 8 July Stephen Carew-Reid - arguing with the Judiciary ... Instead his father John Hastings Carew-Reid talked him into comming back to Perth WA and taking over the. www.mhsoba.asn.au/default.asp?pg=luncheon&spg...; - Cached - Similar - )at http://www.mhsoba.asn.au/default.asp?pg=luncheon&spg;=display&articleid;=2266 ""Stephen Carew-Reid - arguing with the Judiciary
-Stephen went to Christ Church Grammer School until 1962 when his family moved to Melbourne. There he attended Brighton Grammer School from 1963 to 1969. In 1970 he attended Melbourne High School and received a Commonwealth Scholarship to attend Melbourne University to complete a Law Degree. Instead his father John Hastings Carew-Reid talked him into comming back to Perth WA and taking over the family stone business and completing a Bachelor of Commerce Degree during the years 1971-75. Stephen received 75% of the family company worth about $8,000 in compensation to his other two brothers and one sister receiving about $20,000 to start their adult life with. Stephen built this company up with wise real estate investments from $8,000 in value to over $500,000 by the end of the 1970's. Stephen wanted to develop these properties himself and make a further $1 million development profit by building town houses and offices on the land. During his university days he rented all the rooms out in the houses to pay for the mortgages, had two children and was one of the 8 selected out of over 2,000 entries to fly to Melbourne to be part of the Johny Young Song Festival. His father took control of the company back from Stephen by issuing an extra 5,000 shares now it was very valuable and stopped Stephen from developing the house himself and in fact sold the house to a property developer who made $1 million profit. His father died in 1986 and left the WA Public Trustee as executor of this will. Stephen ended up sueing the Public Trustee for mishandling the etate and ended up representing himself for over a decade in the WA Courts against the Public Trustee who used their power of City Hall against him. Stephen has ended up having his practical expereince in the courts before he did any formal training and has now written a series of books about the fight he has had with the WA Public Trustee and the WA Government called, The Triumph of Truth (Who S Watching the Watchers). The books have been named after his late Great Grand Father, Sir Edgar Bertram McKennal who was well known bronze sculpter in the earty 1900's in Melbourne who went on to becoming quite famous in Europe. Before he left Melbourne to further his art in Europe, | toxic | en |
Note that Latter Day Saint Historians, and two related categories, are being considered for deletion or renaming. Please express any opinions. Attention: Categories up for deletion or movement
5.2.22 Category:Latter Day Saint history to Category:History of Mormonism
5.2.23 Category:Latter Day Saint History Books to Category:History books about Mormonism
5.2.24 Category:Latter Day Saint Historians to Category:Historians of Mormonism
Thanks. | toxic | en |
Error noted. My apologies for the unintended problem which I restored. I will exercise greater care in the future.74.192.7.135 | toxic | en |
re : evergreen deals
look at comments below .
julie
daren j farmer
12 / 20 / 99 01 : 43 pm
to : julie meyers / hou / ect @ ect
cc :
subject : evergreen deals
julie ,
i need to know if the following deals have evergreen provisions to roll into
jan 2000 .
cokinos / 9676 95912 - no this is a gtc firm contract , deal expires with
contract
cokinos / 6373 128952 - this is a gtc spot
coral / 4120 93883 - this is on a single transaction contract , we would need
to check with the trader
encina / 6392 93487 - yes , this is a committed reserve . i marked the
evergreen flag .
midcoast / 5097 92956 - no , gtc lst purchaser , deal expires with contract .
united o & m / 5053 93728 - no , this deal was moved to the wellhead portfolio
for january , but the deal was terminated per legal .
vintage / 2540 93750 - not the right deal number .
thanks .
d | scam | en |
It was signed Moron - what part of that didn't you understand... | toxic | en |
After a request from Mr Chess - I've uploaded the bridge pic to Commons as well. Have a beer for me! (Talk!) | toxic | en |
No..its ful of song lyrics.. | scam | en |
== Samsung Galaxy S Aviator ==
This phone has also been released on US Cellular as the Samsung Galaxy S Aviator SCH-R930 | toxic | en |
You can mock me and act superior as if you know the Word of God so much better than I do all day long as well it seems. | adult_sexism | en |
|decline=You were edit warring on the page, and not discussing on the talk page. | toxic | en |
this week ' s woodworking tip . . . follow - up
good afternoon !
no , this isn ' t a new tip - just a follow - up on the one i sent this
morning . i received some good responses and wanted to pass a couple of them
along .
kevin wrote to say that this tip works like a charm , except for one thing :
he ' s had trouble with the router bit not being perfectly centered on the
base , so his dadoes have ended up less than perfect . i referred to this
briefly at the end of the tip , but here ' s a quick solution for avoiding
the problem .
before routing the dado in the gauge , first mark a point on the base of
your router . ( i simply add a piece of masking tape since it ' s easy to
see . ) then when routing the gauge ( and later , the panel ) , always keep
this mark against the straightedge . your dadoes should be right on .
another email came in from mike , who suggested making two alignment
gauges . then you can clamp one at each end of the workpiece before you
clamp the straightedge fence down . this prevents the " wiggling " that
often occurs when one end is clamped before the other . great tip !
a big thanks to all who have been sending in suggestions . it ' s great to
hear that so many people are enjoying the tips .
talk to you again in a few weeks .
jon garbison
on - line editor
woodsmith
visit our other woodworking and home improvement sites :
100 + woodworking plans :
woodsmith magazine :
shopnotes magazine :
workbench magazine :
kits , jigs , tools , project plans :
back issues :
woodworking forums :
to change your email address or resubscribe , sign up again at
to unsubscribe , send empty email message to :
note : your subscribed email address is | scam | en |
Oh well thank you for your two cents, Tom. With regards, CaliforniaDreamlings | toxic | en |
"
Yep, the link you provided, Jethro, gets me there, with Blue V-T-E. But above (and in the articles) it displays with red V and T, and when you click on the blue E to edit, it says ""Creating Template:Palestinian terrorist attacks in the 2000s"". Can it be fixed? (talk) " | toxic | en |
"
Useless
This page is not helpful to Wikipedia but probably I should remove the ""{{db}}" | toxic | en |
I hate to say this so bluntly, but this IP user's lack of effective communication skills and apparent failure to demonstrate a modicum of common sense leaves me the impression that they may not have the skill set necessary to become a productive contributor on Wikipedia. I'll leave them a note on their talk page, but if their unconstructive pattern of editing continues, I wouldn't be opposed to a 36-hr block. From user Kurtis on the wikipedia incident board. See how ignorant admins are! he/she is judging me on an article's edit. This person will hide his face when he/she knows I can communicate much much better than this guy. Just using words and phrases like modicum , effective etc doesnt make one a PhD of english. A major discovery in exoplanets does make one a PhD in Astrophysics me. Hey, i am doing this on purpose, so that you are proven so wrong in terms of your judgement! Again, just give a single reason why I should follow your policies, when all of you who have dealing with me have not followed them yourselves? (please dont come and say dont blame on others is a wikipedia policy. it would be hillarious as i know that policy as well! why dont you all look athe mirror first and acknowledge what mistakes you have rather than judging my face first! It is crystal clear to even a baby that the article is full of lies and should have been massively edited for WP:NPOV and WP:Puffery....108.78.177.132 | toxic | en |
The Magic Years Promotion | toxic | en |
Because I cut-n-pasted the format from one of the minority which did have the tags apparently. Ho hum. I'll fix them. (Talk) | toxic | en |
"
By the way, Terrillja, where is your evidence of the French or American claims? You claimed that the Libyan source lacks evidence and that it's an unreliable source. But you have no evidence to prove coalition claims. We use links as information... whether one is true or not is not up to you to decide. Wikipedia is supposed to be nutral and show both sides reports. Everything is a ""report"" not a fact that can be proven beyond doubt. All we have to go on with the French claims is a link... all we have to go on with the Libyan shot down claim is a ""report"". So do tell me... whats the difference?? - AGSman61" | toxic | en |
Triangular sails
In the history section, it is claimed that ships with triangular sails didn't appear until the 17th century, however this other article claims otherwise: Lateen | toxic | en |
:::Which external links do you mean? | toxic | en |
:: PRODs should not be used to side-step AfD discussions for articles that an editor may wish to keep. In the vast majority of situations where I have contested a PROD the final outcome has been to not delete. If you believe an article still needs to be deleted, then take it to AfD and let the community have their say. Your point has been made, and I have replied. Please do not continue this discussion on my talk page. | toxic | en |
== Gratulálok! ==
Gratulálok! Ki tudta, hogy egy Magyar fogja kitalálni, hogy mikkor lesz az 1.000.000 szócikket szerkesztve! | toxic | en |
"
Apologies. I didn't know that, and if the edit I reverted had been summarised ""the lede of an article should not cover material not included in the article body"" I wouldn't have touched it. What it said was something much more inflamatory and misleading " | toxic | en |
==Prester John==
There is an interesting discussion playing out at . If I'm reading it right, PJ has been evading your 3 month block by use of the sockpuppet . But I could be wrong. | toxic | en |
"::::: This is what prompted my question in the last post. I've said it before and I'll say it again; this is not a source issue. I'm not arguing for the inclusion of anything. Here's another question: What sources should I be giving you? It's a policy issue; the sources are policy. Besides, you say things should be based on sources yet there are no sources that say ""antisemitic canard"". As for the categories you mentioned, the first two don't have judgments of right or wrong or true or false in the definition. Hoax is different than canard because it does not imply that it's totally right or totally wrong. Additionally, hoaxes usually have a single or a few conspirators, when the antisemitic ""ZOG"" is alleged by several different independent groups. A canard and a hoax are certainly not the same thing at all. On top of all that, the use of the word ""canard"" is unencyclopedic editorializing.
And just for the record, it certainly is a personal attack. Even if it's veiled as a summary of my contribution log (an inaccurate summary, mind you I've written several articles and made the majority of my edits on topics that have nothing to do with ZOG/the holocaust/etc) it's still a personal attack. Please talk about the issue at hand, not about the editor. '''''' [Talk|Email]
" | toxic | en |
Warning removed. Thank you for notifying me of this. | toxic | en |
A house. A car. Keeping it in the bank for later. What is more important: Assuring a comfortable life or cosmetic surgery that may help you attract girls? You probably don't even need it. At 16 im sure your hormones are going crazy. | adult_sexism | en |
==Merge with Arctic Warfare==
What do you think? They're the same rifles, their is no broad difference is context really - the only difference is that Arctic Warfare brings up the rifle's history (although uncomfirmed). | toxic | en |
"
Will do Paul. Have a couple appts. today - not quite feeling up to snuff, but will get it for you when I get back. — ? " | toxic | en |
I believe other publications also carried this story, but are less neutral and reliable than Campbell's articles. These are a little more than Op-Ed pieces. Campbell gives his credentials and provides supporting details in his PC-Pro article, including the exact name of the website Townshend accessed through Landslide. It's unfortunate that this case does reflect on the police handling of the investigation. However, it does seem to have gone wrong right from the beginning when the list of names was leaked from the police department to the press. Once it's become a public issue, then everyone has lost control. It would have been much better handled discreetly. | toxic | en |
"
You're surely referring to my ""depopulation"" of Category:Southern artists: I mean, for every artist who was marked with this category, I removed the category.
The reason was simple. For every state of the US, I think, there exists ""Category: [state] artists""; and certainly for every one of the artists whose articles I fiddled with, there was one or more of Category:Louisiana artists or whatever. For convenience's sake, let's stick with female artists from Louisiana. If somebody is so notably a Louisiana artist as to deserve to be so categorized, she's also automatically a Southern artist.
(I suppose I could imagine an artist who never stepped out of the Pacific northwest or indeed the Netherlands or Karelia or wherever but who yet was claimed to have a ""Southern sensibility"". But I saw no such claim made for anybody there.)
Thus Category:Southern artists seems utterly superfluous.
I don't think there's much point in discussing any other contributor/editor's attribution of motives and predilections to me, so I shan't respond. (If you're that dissatisfied or otherwise concerned, there are channels by which you can complain about me to Wikipedia in general.) However, I'm happy to clarify anything that's not clear in what's written above, and I'm open to an argument for how I'm wrong and Category:Southern artists is not rendered superfluous by Category:Louisiana artists and the rest. " | toxic | en |
Re: RedHat 8.0 and his own freetype
Matthias Haase wrote:
> RH ships the code with the bytecode hinter disabled which makes
> non-AA fonts really ugly.
> This reqiures only a small change for include/freetype/config/ftoption.h,
> it is very well documented.
Red Hat 8.0 ships with the bytecode hinter enabled; I think 7.3 may have
as well.
The enabling change to "ftoption.h" is made by Red Hat's SRPM before
building. Take a look at "freetype-2.1.1-enable-ft2-bci.patch" from the
SRPM; it's pretty clear that this does exactly what needs to be done.
So if your fonts look ugly, lack of bytecode hinting is *not* the cause.
_______________________________________________
RPM-List mailing list <RPM-List@freshrpms.net>
http://lists.freshrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
| scam | en |
"
::::Well, the threshold for inclusion is verifiability, but we cannot give undue weight to a dictionary that contradicts the very book (which only mentions two acts of union - supporting my apparent ""perspective"") you yourself have provided (written, at a glance, by a poetry expert? who uses the Ulster Banner for Northern Ireland on the cover of his book). Looking through just some of the books I have (I can't fit them all on one shelf at the moment), I see the UK described as a constitutional monarchy, a unitary state, a sovereign state, a parliamentary democracy, as composed of four countries, but never as a political union or a union of four countries. It is, therefore, ""plain wrong"" to promote this mistake against a greater, and smarter body of work. | " | toxic | en |
I am back!==
Wow! It has been over a year since I have posted anything here on Wikipedia and for that I am truly sorry! No, I am not dead nor is my lovely Packard Bell Legend 140CDT Supreme. I have been very busy and just have not had much time for play, only work. All work and no play makes owning a computer a bit dull so I have decided to make a dedication to posting here more often to help enhance the Wikipedia community's knowledge of Packard Bell and what good computer systems they really are. I am getting very excited as Thanksgiving is just right around the corner. Normally I post every year on Thanksgiving but last year, I did not get the chance to do so. Things will be different this year, I promise that! Thanksgiving would have to be my very favorite holiday of all time. I just feel so thankful to have such a great family and a great computer. 15 years later, my Packard Bell runs just as good as the day I bought it back in September of 1995! I recently had to upgrade my Internet browser from Microsft Internet Explorer version 5 to Microsoft Internet Explorer version 5.5! I was having trouble as certian websites would not view correctly in Microsoft Internet Explorer version 5. Many of my favorite websites came out too distorted to even use correctly so I am very grateful that Microsft supports up to Microsoft Internet Explorer version 5.5 on Microsoft Windows 95 as I will never upgrade my operating system! Microsoft Internet Explorer version 5.5 works much better and for that I am truly grateful! People must understand that Packard Bell computers are the best around, no questions asked! I plan to continue running my Packard Bell Legend 140CDT Supreme until either I die or my computer dies, wichever comes first. I look forward to spending more time here serving the Wikipedia community and want to let everyone know that I am sorry and will make a commitment to be around more to spread the word about how good Packard Bell is! God bless you all and may the force be with you!
== | toxic | en |
"Well, here's this site to show it may not be ""Muslim propaganda"". Look for Nasareans and you'll see the quotes fresh from Josephus the Traitor.
" | toxic | en |
Damian Keown is a bone fide academic in the field of Buddhist studies with many publications to his name. He is eminently qualified to edit a journal in the field of Buddhist Ethics, and a quick look at the list of contributors will tell you everything you need to know about his ability to attract other bone fide Buddhologists to publish in his online journal! | toxic | en |
What gives you the idea that I don't like the organization? Is anything I've said about it factually incorrect? Given the organization's relative obscurity as a player in the debate over abortion, I would pare down the current subsection by at about a third. I'll suggest new wording that eliminates some of the padding. | toxic | en |
January 2007 (UTC)
go on this and add yourself www.lost.eu/1904a 09:05, 29 | toxic | en |
== goldberg rape? ==
i am taking out the bit where it says goldberg was originaly going to be arrested for rape. that is not true and there is no source | toxic | en |
PolishNationalist | toxic | en |
::::::::I would advise extreme cation in 'extrapolating' anything! In a man of you age, extrapolation can be very dangerous and should have been grown out of years ago. Disgusting and filthy habit! | toxic | en |
I agree, we need to follow WP:DUE. I don't mind if there's a small section, but there's about a million versions of Dispensationalism, we don't need to list everyone. | toxic | en |
"
(1)Paul: ""All my information derives from reliable sources"" You have yet to cite even one either here ,or on the authorship page,or on your home page.Even if you have one the fact that you continue to fill up someone else's page for six weeks without either bothering to excuse yourself or explain yourself constitutes harassment.
""All you do is snip at an established scholar"" I can't snip at an established scholar because after weeks of verbal regurgitation you haven't named one.And if you ever do the proper place to place that name on the Pericles section of the authorship discussion.Do you have difficulty in remembering what you have been writing ,Paul?
""I AM NOT VERY INTERESTED in whether Nelson makes some possibly poor translations from Latin. He is a reliable source for Wikipedia."" Paul,Nelson has apparently made over four hundred poor translations ,all,on the most merciful interpretation ,due to the initial fact that he has never bothered to learn Latin before publishing his biography.Due to one of these four hundred mistranslations he has brought a false accusation of murder.But you are not interested because malicious defamatory information ,according to your interpretation of the laws of evidence ,can still be ""a reliable source for Wickipedia"".This may be true,this be false, but why don't you have the guts to come right out and say what you mean,man. Your pal,Nishidamia did,""This is not about the truth,"" he wrote,and,for him ,as apparently, for you,it isn't. Never has been,may be never will be.
You claim ""the view that Shakspere wrote Shakespeare is undermined because an American woman falsely claimed she was raped a few years ago."" No,we are discussing an English department that knowingly aided and abetted a false rape claim and used every effort in its considerable power to pressure other academics to join them in a knowing and conscious fraud which nearly lead to the deaths of more than one falsely accused students.One of these individuals is former head of the PMLA and claims to be an expert on Shakespeare.
You are claiming,whether or not you are deliberately faking your readers on this point , that all these murderous creeps are ""reliable sources"" under the rules of
Wikipedia and if they publish their ""evidence"" on this blog whether on Crystal Mangum or Swilly Shakspere it must be accepted under the rules of Wikipedia. and that you ""are not very interested"" if they are any more or less truthful than the other crank Strats who obfuscate rational discussion here.
I see the ""charge"" brought against me is that I correctly and charitably described you comments here as ignorant.
By the way you keep ducking my question here as to the identity of a black magician who keeps addressing me and claims to be majoring in iconography at the University of Sussex.
Now get off my page and take all your crappy posts with you.I get one more ignorant letter from you and I am(with the permission of the editorship) going to dump them all right back on your site where your fellow lunatics(if any) can doubtless better savor the fruits of your accumulated wisdom.
" | toxic | en |
I had changed the SS Template. It's all finished and all right, now! | toxic | en |
not a copy violation (website owner noted): | toxic | en |
The Hendre
Hi, sorry been away and not done much Wikiing for a bit. But I have found a rather marvellous photo, I would guess the 1900's 1902, of Charles Rolls landing a balloon on the lawn. Perhaps taken at the time of the 1909 trip Flight Magazine described. Now I just have to work out how to load it. How's your searching going at your grandmother's? | toxic | en |
I did something awesome by accident. I was given the let's be friends bullshit and I replied without thinking "No thanks, I'll pass". The blue screen on her face man | adult_sexism | en |
(Undent) The other wikipedias dont call it a massacre because their sources do not call it a massacre. Arabic sources overwhelmingly do call it a massacre, and thus, the wiki being a product of its sources, the article is called the gaza massacre. This whole time you have been arguing that arabs shouldnt be calling it a massacre, that the facts dont support such a claim. That opinion, whether valid or not, is not what determines the name of an article, it is what the common name in the language for the event that determines the name. You cannot argue that the 2 wikis are discussing the same event, so to then argue that because of the common name for said event is in your mind, and understandably so, non-neutral that we should then censor that undermines core principles of the wikis. Yes the wiki should server to convey facts and hopefully transfer knowledge, but what we think are facts are almost always perceptions of facts. It boggles my mind that something that should be as trivial as asking what is the common term associated with an event in a given language needs to be so difficult. If arabs are calling this event the gaza massacre, then surprise! the name of the article will be the gaza massacre. | toxic | en |
"Can you be bold and update? So long as no info is lost I can't see a problem with it.♦
" | toxic | en |
:RD: After claiming you were no longer active in the section right above, you show up! Welcome back (and please stick around this article is devolving a little bit.) I added hockey to the symbols but have not gotten around to the population estimates. The article could also use a mention of the sales tax increase for arts and the environment, voted in last fall by a referendum despite economic troubles! | toxic | en |
these feces are consumed, and finding dead hookers | toxic | en |
POV
Despite the valid and sweeping criticisms of Freud's approaches from the mainstreams of both behavioural psychology and therapeutic psychiatry, i.e. from the fields in which the article claims a god-like status for the man, the article remains largely hagiographic. | toxic | en |
You have got to be kidding. How can you tell me no one has died in New Orleans, if you were paying atention you would know that there have been hundreds of bodies floating in the streets, most of the city is completely destroyed and the water keeps comming. The mayor has just ordered the remaining 30,000 people in New Orleans to evacuate. | toxic | en |
report requested
lousie , attached , please find the report you requested on home cities with explanation . | scam | en |
"
::: I still don't know what word you are trying for. The current version is reminiscent of ""eliminating"", but velocity is eliminated when something stops! As for the details: Yes, that is a standard quantum mechanical calculation. (However, you have your labels reversed as of 1/17/06. It is the first equation that gives superliminal values, not the second.) In essense, the waves within an object are always superluminal, the the group (which defines the object) travels with the object (and it had better do so). Since the object/wave group itself cannot travel at c or greater, relativity is not violated by this. | " | toxic | en |
If Kenny, JFD, and Freedom skies can have their say on IMA, then so can I... | toxic | en |
== Turkish coffee ==
Why would you undo my edit on the named above article? I just tried to: a) make the formatting more fluid at one point (preparation of coffee), b) correct the misleading citation regarding the Greek situation in the note (isn't that good formatting?), c) state that the preparation of Greek coffee does not resemble the other Balkanian ways but the Turkish. | toxic | en |
Yeah, the only problem is that there aren't that many people involved in the discussion and you-know-who has stayed silent for the last few days thus ensuring there is no discussion to speak of. I know where to ask, I'm just unsure how to demonstrate that we're ready. | toxic | en |
"
Welcome
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see
Wikipedia's policies on vandalism
Policies on banned or discouraged content
If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so on Wikipedia:Sandbox rather than in articles.
If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
Policy on neutral point of view
Guideline on external links
Guideline on conflict of interest
I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! " | toxic | en |
- Reduced risk on heart disease, lung cancer, etc... A normalisation of blood pressure and blood oxygen content. There are also social/financial benefits as well.... | toxic | en |
Re: [Razor-users] Collision of hashes?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
de'i Thursday 29 August 2002 13:36 la Fox cusku di'e
> The following was personal correspondence between two people. I can't
>
> fathom how Razor thinks it is spam:
Was it sent in HTML? If so, and it had a background, the background may have
been sent in a spam.
cmeclax
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9bq9f3/k1hdmG9jMRAk4XAJ9CheEA+/hLIU9zTzfJbPyoPUm+XwCfXgZ1
tg7Fn8JcG9Q13UlKVfaOJzk=
=Mw8+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| scam | en |
"
Dear ""142.177.77.2"" Apology accepted regarding the link, and I hope you will think about the use of expressions such as ""spiel"" and ""smarty-pants"" in responding to other users in the future. They are not very friendly terms and if you go through the discussion above you will see that people with an interest in the article have been able to engage in a dialogue on the issue (even though we hold different views) witout descending to that type of ad hominem attack. I've come to respect Awien's intellect and interest in the subject matter even though we have divergent points of view. Saying ""get your facts straight, i did not make any changes"" [sic] to the related matter was clearly not accurate and it was only after I posted the citation to your change that you ""'fessed up"" and tried to justify the change that you had, in fact, made. I would not have posted my observation that the person at your IP address had made the change without having confirmed the address first. I'm glad another user dealt with the blue-link/redirect issue, but denying your earlier change was not accurate. " | toxic | en |
Each of your 'scholarly' sources easily qualify as unreliable internet blogs - 9/11 Truthers like Fetzer (who irrationally assert that the Republican Party murdered Paul Wellstone) , New World Order conspiracists and left-wing radical blogs are not reliable sources. | toxic | en |
My apologies, I jumped to a conclusion when I shouldn't have. | toxic | en |
REDIRECT Talk:Real Chance of Love (season 1) | toxic | en |
since you just went ahead and delted my comment about you editing my page i guess you were being a vandal. dont edit my page or i will report next time thank you | toxic | en |
You dont know you jabo me abi. | scam | en |
==Thank you==
Thank you Administrator Jeepday for temporarily blocking . It will be appreciated my myself and the Wikipedian community. I only wanted her blocked because she was not listening to anyone and plus, I had most of the pages she edited on my Watchlist. Thank you. ( | | | toxic | en |
"
Correct meaning?
I'd like to fix some details in the italian article, but - as not native english speaker - I need to be sure. This is my question: I suppose that official italian translation is wrong about the lawsuit described in chapter 19.
The original text says They instituted a lawsuit denying the obligation to pay debts to an individual with a prosthetic heart... Does this sentence mean: #1 No one is obligated to pay debts to any robot/android OR #2 A robot/android is not obligated to pay debts? #2 is teh italian version, but #1 looks more logical to me because at the end of chapter #17 Andrew says: ""I have been under obligation to individual members of the firm in times past. I am not, now. It is rather the other way around now and I am calling in my debts."" Thanks! " | toxic | en |
apology
I hereby apologies for all the nuisence that I may have caused to you and hope you continue to make constructive and appropriate comments towards wikipedia. I will be willing to recommend porcupine for and administrator.thanks GB | toxic | en |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.