text stringlengths 1 299k | label stringclasses 4 values | lang stringclasses 2 values |
|---|---|---|
"
== One question. ==
Why did you delete the ""Disney XD on Disney Channel"" page?" | toxic | en |
: Thanks -) | toxic | en |
True, but her videos are really expensive. In fact, some of the most expensive in the world, and the most expensive from Japan. See the list. |heru|nar | toxic | en |
This entry is totally irrelevant i totally agree with W4 | toxic | en |
Image:Anaerobic digesters.jpg
This image was taken by my colleague Yair Zadik in a previous job. The creative commons license tag we viewed as the most appropriate for listing on Wikipedia. | toxic | en |
Railway stations in Wales
Hi again, Yes, I agree with you that the station categorization scheme is currently a mess. I'd suggest the best approach would be to start a discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_UK_Railways. The WikiProject UK Railways is a forum for editors interested in the subject to dsicuss exactly these sort of organizational matters. If we can reach agreement on how to proceed it should be fairly easy to correct this.
By the way, when leaving messages on talk pages, its a good idea to sign at the end. You can do this by adding ~~~~ (that's four tilde characters) at the end of your comment. This automatically gets converted to your username and a timestamp. Best, | toxic | en |
"
Well, let's see. The first subchapter is §8.5 The Problem of Division by Zero. This he follows up with 8.7 Five approaches to Division by Zero, which I will repeat in its entirety. This will take more than one sitting to type in. The following is from Suppes 1957:163-169:
1 ""The first approach differs from the others in that it recommends a change in the baseic logic to deny meaning to expressions like: ¶ 1/0 = 1/0 ¶ Without attempting to characterize the basic changes necessary, we may still offer some general objections to this approach...."" [more to follow tomorrow]
2 ""The second approach is to let x/0 be a real number, but to define division by the conditional definition stated in the last section: IF y≠0 Then x/y = z if and only if x = y*z. In this case for every number x, x/0 is a real number, but we are not able to prove what number it is. ¶ (2) 1/0 = 2/0 ¶ The inability to prove or disprove (2) is an argument against the second approach, since we want our axioms to be as complete as possible.""
3 The third approach agrees with the second in making x/0 a real number, but it differes in making x/0 = 0 for all x. This eliminates the undecidability of statements like (2). For the third approach the appropriate definition of division is a proper definition similar to the axiom-free definition discussed at the end of §8.5:
x/y = z ←→ [y ≠ 0 → x = y*z) & (y = 0 → z = 0)
""An advantage of the third approach is that it permits the definition of zero by a straight forward proper definition fully satisfying the criteria of elminability and non-creativity. The main disadvante of this appraoch is the one mentioned in §8.5: many mathematicians feel uneasy with the identity: ¶ x/0 = 0.
4 The forth approach agrees with the second and third in requiring no basic change of logic; it differes in not making it possible to prove that x/0 is a real number. The basic idea is to introduce a predicate 'R' which means 'is a real number.' Hypotheses using this predicate must be added to all the axioms stated in Chapter 7. Furthermore, to guarantee that addition and multiplication of numbers yield numbers, we must add the two closure axioms:
R(x) & R(y) → R(x+y)
R(x) & R(y) → R(x*y).
""The introduction of the predicate 'R' widens our domain of individuals, for now it does not follow that everything in the domain is a real number (in particular the 1/0 is a real number). The indroduction of 'R' has the further consequence of making it natural to make all our definitions of arithmetical relations and operations conditional. There is no point in defining the realition of equal to or less than, for instance, for things which are not numbers. Thus we would ahve:
[R(x) & R(y)] → [x ≤ y ←→ (x = y V x < y)].
""The definition of division would be:
""(3) [R(x) & R(y)& R(z) & y ≠ 0 ] → [x/y = z ←→ x = y*z].
""If x is a real number, with (3) at hand we cannot prove:
""x/0 is a real number
""And we cannot prove:
""x/0 is not a real number,
""But we are not faced with the counterintuitive situation of being forced to call x/0 a real number. The situation can be improved by introducing into our system a primitive symbol for some object which is not a real number. Without saying what the object is, let us designate it by 'v'. They we have the axiom:
""-R(v) [here - is ~ or bent bar, i.e. NOT]
""that is, the assertion that v is not a real number. We may now definie division by:
""(4) [R(x) & R(y)] → [x/y = z ←→ [y ≠ 0 → (R(z) & x = y*z)) & (y = 0 → z = v]].
""The virtue of (4) is that it definitely places x/0 outside the domain of real numbers for any number x. Such a consequence would seem to be in closest accord with ordinary mathematical usage. Definition (4) also has the virtue of making
x/0 = y/0 ,
""Where x and y are real numbers, thus eliminating a vast proliferation of odd mathematical entities. On the other hand, to see once for all that all is not for the best in this best of all possible worlds, notice that if we adopt (4) we cannot decide whether or not v/v is a real number. If we use conditioncal dfinitions and insist on not tampering with the basic law of identity for therms, then we must be prepared for the undecidability of the statue so fentities like v/v. We make thake the attitude that everything is in good order in the domain where we intend to use the division operation, and we really do not care what is going on elsewhere if not inconsistencies can creap in.
5 ""A fifth approach ... [will have to wait until tomorrow. I will finish up the 1st one also. I've basically typed in the entire section. Bill
" | toxic | en |
By the way, articles at the HRWiki are way better than H*R articles at Wikipedia, simply because these are so neglected and unloved. | toxic | en |
I'm stil not entirely happy about the lack of citations in a few sections of this article, but I'm not unhappy enough about that to remove its GA listing. Thanks for the work that's been done during this reassessment. Fatuorum | toxic | en |
Du lịch của An Giang tập trung chủ yếu vào lĩnh vực du lịch sinh thái và văn hóa. Nơi đây có nhiều điểm tham quan tự nhiên như núi Sam, đồng cỏ Cần Thơ, vườn quốc gia Tràm Chim, cùng với các di tích lịch sử và văn hóa như chùa Bà Chúa Xứ, chùa Xuân Tổ, chợ nổi Long Xuyên. Đặc biệt, An Giang còn nổi tiếng với lễ hội nổi tiếng như lễ hội Bà Chúa Xứ và lễ hội Chol Chnam Thmay của người Khmer. | toxic | vi |
", 22 December 2005 (UTC)
I think ""murder"" carries the connotation of private rather than public killing. ""Percieved crimes"" sounds judicious and works for me. 15:23" | toxic | en |
I'm cool with that... | toxic | en |
"
== Sockpuppet ==
How dare you. You have no proof. I demand that you cancel this investigation. " | toxic | en |
permission given
From: w
Date: November 10, 2010 12:15:44 PM CEST
To: permissions-en@wikimedia.org
Subject: copyright issues
Reply-To: w@thing.net
dear wikimedia people,
just to let you know that the info text at
http://post.thing.net/about
and my resume on
http://www.wolfgangstaehle.info/pages.php?content=resume.php&navGallID;=Resume
is NOT copyrighted.
in the future i will put up a creative commons notice.
the editors of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Thing_%28art_project%29
have my explicit permission to use any material from both sites.
best regards,
wolfgang staehle | toxic | en |
OK, i fixed it, removed a bunch of stuff such as from unreliable sources blogs and web sites which don't bother to name their sources, they could just be writing anything any which way they like. And provided refs for the St Patrick's one (borderline ref, if you ask me). Removed the Copyright violation tag, now that it is perhaps acceptable. Man you'd done a sloppy job, throwing crappy URLs left and right, some not even matching the statements they were supposed to back up. No thanks. | toxic | en |
I am not arguing over such a thing more so pointing out what is said in your replies. | adult_sexism | en |
re : possible temporary move of hpl to 1201 louisiana
russell ,
thanks for the update . can you provide a rough quote / schedule to kit out the louisiana space for 130 people - please contact lillian carroll to get an exact count . we don ' t need recorded phones . also please lay out a schematic of the hardware configuration between enron , louisiana and aep ' s offices for this solution .
deborah ,
can you provide lillian with a floor plan so that she can start locating the hpl staff by function . also , what do you recommend regarding furniture ? we should be able to come up with an interim solution based on the space coming available in 3 allen or any additional furniture we have in warehouses or in the louisiana bldg . your thoughts on cost for this ?
once we have a plan / schedule i will follow up with aep to let them know of our plans . they already know we are headed in this direction , given their delay in leasing space .
regards ,
brian
from : russell long / enron @ enronxgate on 03 / 14 / 2001 06 : 54 pm
to : brian redmond / hou / ect @ ect
cc : tommy yanowski / enron @ enronxgate , louise kitchen / hou / ect @ ect , philippe a bibi / enron @ enronxgate , vincent fox / enron @ enronxgate , keith dziadek / enron @ enronxgate , jim coffey / hou / ect @ ect , deborah bubenko / epsc / hou / ect @ ect , paul foust / epsc / hou / ect @ ect , robert humlicek / enron @ enronxgate , jeffrey vincent / enron @ enronxgate , andrew hawthorn / enron @ enronxgate , heather a johnson / enron @ enronxgate
subject : possible temporary move of hpl to 1201 louisiana
i finished the walk through of the 15 th floor space located at 1201 louisiana this afternoon . on the walk through with me were paul foust ( facilities ) , robert humlicek , jeffrey vincent and andrew hawthorn . i previously talked with deborah bubenko and vincent fox about this space . comments from the review are as follows :
most of the floor is composed of offices with some large group areas ( conference rooms etc . ) included . the floor can accommodate up to 150 people . however , with this amount of people in the area , space will be very tight . almost all offices will need to hold at least two people . large offices will need to hold three or four . the larger areas will need to have cubicles installed to make complete use of the space . with maximum doubling up in the offices , you might fit a couple of conference rooms on the floor with one kitchen area . there are nooks just off some of the hallways that would accommodate several network printers .
as tommy stated in his earlier e - mail on the allen center space , the fire code will require us to put a strobe in each office with multiple occupants .
one area of concern is the amount of furniture currently on the floor . the floor plan shows approximately 90 desks on the floor . some offices were locked so we could not verify the total . however , this number appears correct . also , for the most part , there were only desks in the offices unless they were occupied . chairs , filing cabinets , credenzas , etc . would needed to be added to this space . we need to determine where the additional furniture will come from .
there is one large area with 11 cubicles forming a circle . according to paul , this was the area where telephones were answered for the previous tenant . this might work for the trading area . the room appears to have the most telephone connectivity , is open , and would accommodate up to 11 .
if we decide trader telephones are necessary ( record conversations etc . ) , the cost associated with the purchase of the equipment and the necessary installation time will need to be factored into our schedule .
the floor has two data closets . at least one of the closets has 24 hour air conditioning according to vincent .
this floor has the same server connectivity at the three allen center space . a 100 meg single mode fiber connection serves this space .
robert has informed me that the floor currently has switches to support up to 200 ports . however , this does not mean that the drops to all offices are complete . probably some cabling will need to be added . it appears that the space can accommodate up to 150 users even with the extra ports needed for network printers , laptops , etc . however , if we need to accommodate more than 200 ports , additional switches can be added .
in summary , the floor space at 1201 louisiana looks as good or better than the space that was being considered at three allen center .
russell s . long
enron net works , llc
russell . long @ enron . com
( 713 ) 345 - 3754 | scam | en |
"
Considering that particular image is of a transwoman in a gay pride parade, I would think it is fairly appropriate for a section on ""Transgender in contrast with sexual orientation,"" as it does a good job at illustrating the often complicated relationship between the two concepts. An image of a transman would certainly be appropriate for balance, though the key is that any images shouldn't be of a random transgendered person, but should somehow illustrate and enhance the text they accompany. ✽ " | toxic | en |
Will she be the official Queen?
I cannot see why not as Henry VIII made his new wifes Queens,so it stands to reason-surely she cant be blackballed can she? | toxic | en |
Ngân Hà hình thành từ sự sụp đổ và sự tương tác của các đám mây khí và bụi trong không gian. Khi các đám mây này sụp đổ vì tác động của lực hấp dẫn, chúng bắt đầu xoắn ốc và hình thành các cấu trúc gọi là đĩa xoắn. Trong đĩa xoắn, vật chất bắt đầu tập trung vào trung tâm và hình thành một ngôi sao. Xung quanh ngôi sao, các hành tinh, sao và hệ sao hình thành, tạo nên một hệ thống gọi là Ngân Hà. | toxic | vi |
The process against Grabovoi is an enciclopedia of all the possible violations of the human rights and the Russian Constitution. Those, who studied the case, know it very well. None of the episodes has been proved by the prosecution, still he has been charged 11 years! Murderers get less in Russia. The true reason for the victimizing of the prominrent Academic and a very powerful psychic was his wish to become the President of Russia and to buid a Heaven for everyone. He had a good chance, and what Putin does to his political opponents is well known in Russia and in the World. That's why the article needs to be corrected. The Article about Graboboy on the Russian Wikipedia is much bigger and looks way more open minded. Why his followers were called a sect in the article? What's the ground for it? And the lack of publications and TV programs - it's a mistake. There were and there are plenty, but all very aggressive to Grabovoy and full of lies. TV and nearly all the media is under the Government's control in Russia. | toxic | en |
Michael McCahon is gay. | toxic | en |
This has been discussed to death. The consensus is to keep as is. talk-contribs | toxic | en |
I never said it would happen. I just said that I wouldn't be suprsed if it does. I made that guess based on everything that's happened so far in Naruto, and the way Kishimoto creates plot twists of this kind. Now your comment is what seems fanboyish and unjustifiable. Kabuto already seemed to have a kind of kind of second nature back during the first part of the series where his eyes would change color when he got mad. Kishimoto wouldn't give him a similar state to Juugo, because it wouldn't be something that new and because he wouldn't want to have two characters be so similar. And as for my Orochimaru possesing Itachi theory, just because something happens at one point doesn't mean it will be the same story next time. By your logic, just because Kakashi needed the help of his students (look 2-3 people right there!) to bail him out of Zabuza's trap during their first meeting, that would mean Zazbuza could have easily killed him during their second meeting when they were fighting alone. Or just because even Gaara's own father, the Kazekage himself, feared Gaara's power, a genin like Naruto shouldn't have been able to beat him let alone after he transformed. Or how could the Uchiha, being the strongest clan of Konoha, be killed so easily by a single member of their village? See? You definetly chose the wrong story to bring up that kind of logic. Practically every single fight in Naruto craps all over it. Orochimaru COULD take over Kabuto, and go on to Itachi after Sasuke's team has weakened him. Perhaps they cause him to overuse his Sharingan eyes, who knows? Orochimaru could find him, make his move, steal his body, and seek vengeance on Sasuke. The point is just that neither of us knows whats gonna happen and we'll just have to read the story. | toxic | en |
"
Intelligent design start
re your wondering ""I don't know exactly which sources would be free of such potential bias"", and suggested sources ...
responding here since what I've to say isn't on the threads topic... I've got two thoughts on bias
1. We don't need to just use the cites. I think defining ID should not be our creatively editing, nor taking from a outside source, but rather should present just cite to fact of what the origination/definition was/is without worrying over if they are right, wrong or motives otherwise we've not presented that position in way that can avoid adding color, and have no basis cite that seems defensible..
2. I think the article is unrecoverably biased, but meh since it's fairly obvious that it is so mitigates the issue. It is also a bit better yet if a statement is cited if the source is clearly one side or the other then makes things clearer to the reader.
." | toxic | en |
"Welcome!
Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!
Notability of Poornima Dilip
A tag has been placed on Poornima Dilip requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. " | toxic | en |
"
Just removed misleading content by an editor, probably a troll. It only mentioned nine specific men at that one specific bar in the sources, not ""many men"" as written by the editor. The editor was being dishonest and writing things not in the sources. " | toxic | en |
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Hurricanehink. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. | toxic | en |
"
Semi-protected edit request on 7 November 2015
in the first paragraph, the word 'and"" is in duplicate several sentences down.
" | toxic | en |
"
Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bobthepoop for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. " | toxic | en |
Unofficial decorations of the U.S. Military
Talk:Unofficial decorations of the United States military
Hello, please take a look at my comment on the talk page of an article you created. I see that you have much experience as an editor, but I have some problems with the article. Looking for constructive improvements if possible. | toxic | en |
- [added later] Also -> Now some genius added the Catalonian sub-government head's platitudes and added a pretty flag? Hey! Let's start adding the comments from mayors around the world too and adding cute little icons! | toxic | en |
re : path manager rewrite / optimization project
since lisa used fuchsia , i ' ll use lavender . .
on # 1 i would eliminate that processing . in addition , can we delete / hide / not access old paths that haven ' t been used in gas production in lets say a year or so . would this help performance ? this would also force the schedulers to path / think about the way they are pathing their transactions and not rely on old paths that may no longer be accurate ! ! we ' ve seen old bad , zero paths be re - used accidentally .
on # 2 , the scheduling position window is the weakest link . . . . . goodbye !
on # 3 , contract reference i know is used alot in the supply and market list . nomlogic is also slated to use these contract reference fields for comments . do we need it in the inventory list ? probably not as much as the supply and market list but i still believe it ' s necessary for pools and imbalance accounts .
on # 4 , we use this functionality alot on cgas , tenn , trco and sab . . . when we path one to many or many to one in " chunks , " it does seem to go faster than one path at a time .
on # 5 , brokered paths could really just be slammed in there . no need for the extra processing that occurs for service contracts .
thanks
- - - - - original message - - - - -
from : sullivan , patti
sent : friday , october 12 , 2001 9 : 50 am
to : pena , matt
cc : warner , john ; ripley , brian ; d ' souza , romeo ; rao , ramesh ; lamadrid , victor ; sullivan , mary ; staab , theresa ; farmer , daren j . ; jaquet , tammy ; superty , robert ; bussell l , kathryn ; kinsey , lisa ; heal , kevin ; pinion , richard
subject : re : path manager rewrite / optimization project
i also agree with richard and lisa .
- - - - - original message - - - - -
from : heal , kevin
sent : friday , october 12 , 2001 9 : 28 am
to : kinsey , lisa ; pinion , richard ; pena , matt
cc : warner , john ; ripley , brian ; d ' souza , romeo ; rao , ramesh ; lamadrid , victor ; sullivan , mary ; sullivan , patti ; staab , theresa ; farmer , daren j . ; jaquet , tammy ; superty , robert ; bussell l , kathryn
subject : re : path manager rewrite / optimization project
i agree with richard and lisa . especially important is to keep # 4 . we do a lot of many to one and one to many pathing , especially on nova .
- - - - - original message - - - - -
from : kinsey , lisa
sent : wednesday , october 10 , 2001 3 : 56 pm
to : pinion , richard ; pena , matt
cc : warner , john ; ripley , brian ; d ' souza , romeo ; rao , ramesh ; lamadrid , victor ; sullivan , mary ; sullivan , patti ; heal , kevin ; staab , theresa ; farmer , daren j . ; jaquet , tammy ; superty , robert ; bussell l , kathryn
subject : re : path manager rewrite / optimization project
my comments are in fuschia .
lisa
- - - - - original message - - - - -
from : pinion , richard
sent : wednesday , october 10 , 2001 2 : 35 pm
to : pena , matt
cc : warner , john ; ripley , brian ; d ' souza , romeo ; rao , ramesh ; kinsey , lisa ; lamadrid , victor ; sullivan , mary ; sullivan , patti ; heal , kevin ; staab , theresa ; farmer , daren j . ; jaquet , tammy ; superty , robert ; bussell l , kathryn
subject : re : path manager rewrite / optimization project
following are my comments . the managers cc ' d might have some additional thoughts .
- - - - - original message - - - - -
from : pena , matt
sent : monday , october 08 , 2001 4 : 26 pm
to : pinion , richard ; jaquet , tammy ; superty , robert ; pena , matt
cc : warner , john ; ripley , brian ; d ' souza , romeo ; rao , ramesh
subject : path manager rewrite / optimization project
importance : high
all :
we ' re currently identifying processes that are inefficient and could possibly benefit from being rewritten or not even performed . going foward , i would like bob to appoint a lead business person to whom we could ask questions and or suggest ideas to so that they could in turn validate this information with the desk managers / schedulers . we had this approach with nomlogic and having clarissa work the issues worked quite nicely . who ever you choose , we would need about 15 % of their time for now . later on , with coordination efforts and testing , it may go up to 75 % . i don ' t see that happening for a while though .
the sooner we get someone to devote to this , the better off we will be . i expect these changes that we ' ll be looking into should improve performance quite a bit .
that being said , we ' ve identified three items that would speed up processing the retrieval of path manager .
1 ) currently , the path manager attempts to reuse path ids . i can ' t think of any reason why we need to perform this extra step ? it runs through this processing on the application and generally doesn ' t find a match . i know patti has mentioned this several times and i can ' t think of a valid reason for performing this work . i talked with dave nommensen , and according to him , what used to happen is that sometimes schedulers would get duplicate paths out there which is why they put this code in place ? ? ? from a scheduling perspective , my understanding of what your main concern is to just maintain your position and be able to change it . if you were overpathed , you ' d see it in the path manager either way . [ pinion , richard ] to restate the question for clarity , in path manager a scheduler pulls down a supply , market and a service , adds any up / downstream contract information and / or duns or drn override and then saves it . unify looks for an old path with those exact variables and if it finds it re - uses it and if it does not find an exact match creates a new path and path id . i had been told that to do away with this function would create an unacceptably high amount of paths since any path once nominated on could not be deleted . has this changed ? ? ? at one time there were some schedulers that looked for the same path / activity number match for nominations . texas eastern was the only pipeline that needed the old activity numbers no matter how long it had been since they were used . i spoke with chris ordway and the new link system no longer needs this to occur . transco uses activity numbers but uses the activity number cross reference table to that function and therefore should not be affected . therefore , if it does not create a space or memory problem for unify , i don ' t think that this constant old path look up is needed . [ kinsey , lisa ] get rid of this .
2 ) the scheduling position window : does anyone use this ? if not , we ' ll remove the code logic that populates this window . i have never seen a scheduler use this . please verify . [ pinion , richard ] originally such a window was in use by everyone in the legacy system " autonoms " so it was duplicated in unify by request . it is not used in unify now because of the other sophisticated tools unify provides which obviate it ' s use . the only value would be notification of bridge errors or contract imbalances but there are other ways to determine those problems . as voted on in a previous meeting of the managers - lose it ! [ kinsey , lisa ] why is this still here ?
3 ) on the inventory pool list , does anyone need to see the contarct references list ? again , this code is called every retrieval time and doesn ' t appear to be used from my observations . if they do need this information , we could provide it , but if not , i ' d prefer to remove the functionality . [ pinion , richard ] this function is still very much in use by those with point based pipelines that must use the imbalance pool to facilitate balancing nomination volumes where multiple pipeline external pools exist and are pathed through the same contract imbalance pool . keep it ! [ kinsey , lisa ] yes . we use this functionality a lot when pathing pools .
4 ) when pathing a one to many or many to one set of paths , what ' s the average number of paths they create at one time ? what about updates ? i know that anr and nigas are big users of this feature since they have small packages of gas that they are limited in size to . does the system seem faster when you update one record at a time or chunks of records ? my real question is how often they do this and for what number of paths on both updates and inserts . by update , i mean , going to the path list and changing an upstream / downstream contract or a psna which in turn forces a new path to be created . [ pinion , richard ] this one to many or many to one pathing goes on every day on every pipeline . there is no ' average ' . they typically update a path with up / downstream meters or duns or dnb numbers one at a time however . i hope this answers your question . i see no change to this process at this time [ kinsey , lisa ] on some pipes this function is used more than others . when it is used we try and do as many paths as possible . at this time i do not see a need to change this process .
5 ) on brokered paths , do you want to utilize the same logic we have for service ? in other words , when updating brokered arrangements , we don ' t incorporate the same logic for zeroing out the path and recreating a new arrangment link and hence sending it to be renominated ? why do we do this for service ? is it because we have to renominate it ? i assume that ' s what it ' s for since we don ' t send brokered paths to the pipe . anyway , with the nomlogic implmentation ( two way interface ) , we were planning on having it behave the same way as service . we need this verified . [ pinion , richard ] we don ' t perform the same logic for brokered paths because these are not nominated to the pipeline and hence do not need a zero path to be resent to the pipeline when a significant change is made to the already nominated path . i don ' t see a need to change the way brokered paths are behaving at this time . [ kinsey , lisa ] agree with richard . | scam | en |
The Jewish New York style knysh is unknown in Israel. And seems to have been created by the immigrates in New York itself. | toxic | en |
Operation COOKIE MONSTER | toxic | en |
"
USER JZA
This editor continues to manipulate edits in the Liverpool area. He has removed this text ""Waterloo holds the postcode ""L22"" and adjoins Blundellsands and Crosby to the north and Seaforth to the south and is a northern suburb of the city of Liverpool"" by stating it is unsourced. What is unsourced? That it is a northern suburb of Liverpool? that can be altered perhaps..............What about L22 POSTCODE? you think that is not true? What about adjoining Blundellsands and Crosby? You think that is unsourced? Cut the fony edits please Jza " | toxic | en |
Gen Z would totally do that, and she's gonna end up punching a child. Fucking leftists man. | adult_sexism | en |
"
If something gets tagged as being on the spam blacklist, I will remove it, pure and simple. Rather than get into a pointless editwar, I used the redirect. (tell Luke off here) " | toxic | en |
Unspecified source for Image:Brenda_Song,_Raven_Symone,_&_Ashley_Tisdale_in_The_Suite_Life_Goes_Hollywood.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Brenda_Song,_Raven_Symone,_&_Ashley_Tisdale_in_The_Suite_Life_Goes_Hollywood.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Talk | toxic | en |
The biographers have discussed it. David Donald says that, “Modern physicians who have sifted the evidence agree that Lincoln never contracted the disease.” | toxic | en |
":::::Have no fear, he'll be back in 2 months looking ""noble"", and all his history will have been forgotten. He'll have a whole new set of and Merkey sockpuppets defending him, all clamoring to cry ""stalker!"" and ""troll!"" at anybody with any knowledge of Mr. Merkey's modus operandi. Anybody daring to refer to Mr. Merkey's history will be dismissed as a troll. I already feel dirty for stumbling on to this horrifying mess in the last few days. -
" | toxic | en |
So yeah, I've been like banned or something for 2 days. ( You take editing too seriously. What is it with you people? You're all facts, no heart. So when was the last time you went outside and contributed to the real world? | toxic | en |
Hello...
(If you're interested... we could really use your help!) | toxic | en |
== I disagree most fulsomely, goode wench == | toxic | en |
Samuel Smiles wrote long after the Wealden iron industry was extinct. Anything good that he discovered on the subject has long been overtaken by detailed archival research incorporated into the works by Staker and by Cleere and Crossley, cited as main sources. I would strongly recommend that Smiles shold NOT be cited. | toxic | en |
file
i hope this goes faster this time . | scam | en |
|listas = Paul of Middelburg | toxic | en |
"
That was not a threat, ""Jack,"" it was information. I have reported your homophobic censoring of the scholarly discussion of Rydberg's homosexuality to the LGBT Studies Project. Hopefully, they can bring some kind of administrative pressure to bear on you, so that the good-faith efforts of other editors to restore NPOV to this article can resume. " | toxic | en |
::::Thnk you. | toxic | en |
Not to disrespect the user who created this page by any means, but I think it would be better if the page name was to be shorten to just BAMMA 9, as it would then follow the traditional path of previous BAMMA events on Wikipedia follows. (BigzMMA ) | toxic | en |
You guys just don't get it. Your bad behavior drives other editors off the site who then become enemies. Editors like Brangifer and Verbal are trouble-makers who go around attacking articles and offending other editors who are trying to contribute their knowledge. Neither of them has a collaborative attitude. They barrel into an article with guns blazing and wonder why people end up hating them and can't assume good faith. Editors who spend all day, every day, on the site as if it were a full-time job are just mucking things up for editors who are trying to be productive. Once an editor has exhausted his knowledge, any further contribution he makes is of little value. It is the Brangifers and Verbals on the site who are initiating the edit-wars. | toxic | en |
"
My proposal is that, when we do get an article on him, it should be ""Imre Aladar"", with a note of some kind on the original name. Considering the info you bring in, he probably made an even more radical change in using the Romanian version (for lack of a better word) of his name: I double checked, and the 1978 dictionary has him under ""A"" (I'm guessing that, aside from not using diacritics, he inverted his names?). " | toxic | en |
==Spider Man, Spider Man== | toxic | en |
Thank you for this additional information and intervention. I appreciate the recommendations and will adhere to them in the future. Respectfully, | toxic | en |
"
Ernie: Well, I'm not surprised at all. Of course I'll support the templates. They provide a super purpose in linking films. To be honmest, that's one of the reasons I started editing Argentine films. I saw the cohesiveness of the section. The template is very important.
The problem is ego and the ""psychology"" of some wikipedians. Some may feel they should have control in the section they work in. People begin to take ""quasi"" proprietary thoughts about not only their area of expertise on wiki, but in the edits they make in that area.
In a de facto way you take care of the Cinema of Argentina. There are others who may take the same approach to other areas of the cinema world but place ego very much into it (I've never found you that way). They subconsciously took it as an affront that you did not talk to them first. That's why I'm hesitant to take on other areas in the world of cinema, there are so many footprints and egos to deal with.
I agree with Hoverfish completely as to the approach you take vis a-vis the arguments you make in this matter. I also state that I'm in ""touch with your emotions.""
I'm glad to be working on the cinema of Argentina and have a very understanding majordomo such as yourself. You always see the bigger picture and have been of tremendous help.
Finally, I will be complety ticked off if the Argentina template is removed. Let's get our ducks in a row. I have some ideas on votes.
In Unity, " | toxic | en |
thank you
thank you, i dont like it when roads connect togher such as the a511 and a50, i wish the a511 road could run from leicester to burton upon trent near the a50 and i wish the a50 could be the express carriageway. | toxic | en |
( ) | toxic | en |
"
Keifer, in slightly over 24 hours you have made 50 contributions. Almost all of them related to the latest Malleus farrago, and you have kept up that sort of pace for days. You've commented on numerous talk pages and reiterated yourself on numerous occasions. It is much more than merely responding, and in so far as it is responding the volume may reflect the sheer number of fronts that you are trying to cover. I mentioned ""less haste, more speed"" above, but another saying that might be apt is ""less is more"".What you do and how you do it is entirely your affair, of course, but one thing I've noticed is that Malleus seems rarely to respond directly to the many posts that you make at his own talk page. There may be some conclusions to be drawn from that. Demiurge's point regarding MONGO may have some validity, also. Certainly, both of you are going at it hammer-and-tongs and, as much as I do not like the current situation at Arbcom, it is reaching the point where I for one am tending not to bother reading many of the messages posted by you both: frankly, they've become boring and repetitive. That is the nature of propaganda, not debate. " | toxic | en |
Hello FisherQueen. Please see the AN thread. Blueboy arbitrary blocked all my accounts which are all legitimate alternate accounts under WP:SOCK. His blocking was without cause or support of same on the thread. IMO, all of Blueboy's recent blocks on my accounts should be undone as premature if not unwarranted. By way of explanation, both Justanother, my main account, and JustaHulk, a joke alternate account, have been disabled by me for some time as a semi-retirement. Alfadog was blocked at the beginning of this dispute by another admin and I am addressing that separately and not asking for unblock of that account here, just asking for unblock of Blueboy's work. This account was started at the request of admins at the AN thread that I choose one voice and stick to that. That request has been withdrawn but I am fine with sticking to this account pending resolution of the AN issue. However, I feel that Blueboy's blocks were premature and perhaps punitive and all three should be undone pending any resolution at AN. Thanks. | toxic | en |
Thanks Moonriddengirl. Wikidea, I'm sure you're an excellent lawyer, and I admire your goal to turn Wikipedia into a superior reference work for law students - it's one I share, with one amendment. Wikipedia is not a legal resource for lawyers and law students. It is not a casebook. It is not a practitioner's text. It is a work for the laypeople, to explain as simply as possible (in this case) how the law works. That's what you should aspire to with your articles, and it's what I aspire to with mine. The layperson is more helped by third-party references and summaries than (to them) unintelligible case citations and full body quotations from judgments. While such quotations and citations have their place (this, I feel, uses such case citations well, but I might be a teensy bit biased) they are the obiter, not the ratio. | toxic | en |
Why is there no personal imformation in this article?
Did she or virgin records write it? Why is anything on her personal life deleted, or is she more powerful than any other celebrity and questions about her sexuality, lovers and life outside music are strictly private? | toxic | en |
"
If the information can be demonstrated to be of widespread notability, then it will meet the criteria. (To clarify, they are not my criteria, they are the criteria that have been agreed to by the Wikipedia community.) Please note that merely authoring a management textbook is not sufficient to demonstrate notability it must be demonstrated that the book has had a widespread impact on industry (rather than ""used by several organizations""). Please understand that I am not trying to thwart your efforts, but rather guide them in the proper direction. Many an author has put a great deal of effort into a Wikipedia article about some topic or another that is near and dear to their heart, but which does not meet the global notability standards that Wikipedia strives to uphold. ChatMe!ReadMe!! " | toxic | en |
"
Laughable, eh? What's so funny about it? You make a claim, yet have no logical basis to base it on. Look into this more closely, there IS a Standard English, what standard do you think the UN uses for all English-speaking countries. ""Yeah, there are many English speaking countries, but let's just use Britains dialect, for no reason whatsoever!"", is this what you think goes on in New York? Lol, anyways, did I say that leaving Wikipedia just the way it is results in a less informative encyclopedia? I said no such thing! My argument is that the inherent nature of an encyclopedia is that ALL of the information is based on one standard, so the reader doesn't get confused, and that this inherent nature must be present in Wikipedia as well! It's like trying to subtract X from Z, and expecting a numerical answer, it just doesn't mutually comply, and doesn't work well with an organized, compiled database of informative facts. I agree with you 100% that enhancing your knowledge of dialects is important, but it's just as important as learning how gum is made, learning more about George Washington, and learning what blood is made of, in a relative sense. And this is EXACTLY why there was an article on American/British spelling differences, just as there are articles for chewing gum, George Washington, and blood, and EXACTLY why I chose to raise this issue on that certain articles Talk Page. That's what encyclopedias are for, LEARNING, but learning at your OWN careful and deliberate discretion, not someone elses.
Ok, sir, my mistake for not checking my facts, but I just assumed, obviously wrongly, that words like ""pedophile"" are pronounced the same in both British and American dialects, but only because I've heard British people pronounce pedophile as ""PED-OH-PHILE"". So, like a normal intelligent person would do, they would make a claim with a reasonable logic base, and not just personal agenda. And you seem to think that I've never heard of that ""ae"" being merged as one letter, do you seriously take me as a fool? Hope not, beause only a fool and an intellect would raise this issue in the first place, and I am by NO means a fool. Well, I've made mistakes in my past, but so has everybody, right? But in the scholastic sense, I am no fool, at all. Anyways, just incase you AGAIN misread what I wrote, I didn't claim to believe they pronounce it ""PAH-EHD-OH-PHILE"", I was just giving an example for my statement ""there are words common in both the British and English dialect that in the British dialect aren't spelled as pronounced"". I assumed, based on my reasonings in the first sentence of this paragraph, that both the British and Americans pronounce this word, and similar words, identically. According to you, I am false on this, but I do not have much faith in your credibility, so I will have to look deeper into this one. ANYWAYS, the reason I even made this argument is that you rebutted my original statement that read somewhere along the lines of ""generally speaking, English words are pronounced as spelled, letter-by-letter"" with the fact that the word ""color"" is spelled ""colour"" in Britain, yet it is pronounced ""CUH-LIHR"".
O.K., we're kind of going in circles here, so lets just concentrate on the main issue(s) here. There are many words that have greek or latin prefixes, yet the word itself isn't related to the meaning of given prefix(es). This is, as far as I know, just coincidence, and unfortunately, partially due to the fact that it's late and I'm tired, I can't think of any examples off the top of my head, but you should know some yourself. Actually, I CAN think of them, but I'm too lazy, and it would be quite redundant, for lack of a better term. So therefore, strictly speaking, ""pedophilia"" is by NO accounts a word for ""foot fetish"".
You seem to think that this is some sort of ""battle of the dialects"" (lol), and seem to think that this is what I seem to think (now, that's redundant!) as well, but as I've CLEARLY stated, this is not so. I agree with you 110% that no one is ""better"" than the other, but ""better"" is very subjective and I'm strictly speaking from an objective point of view. O.K., just so we're on the same page, I'll reword my argument as best I can, for I am pretty tired, so we can stop going in circles:
""Wikipedia is a database of information, and as a database (and also an encyclopedia), there must be a standard setting, language, consolidation, unification, etc., so that the information is clear, proper, and concise. In order to acheive this unity, there must be a standard for which all other articles are based. It makes no sense not use the dialect that the majority of the English-speaking world uses, and to use one that a minority, regardless of quantitative value, uses. Therefore, since the majority of the English-speaking world uses the so-called ""American-English"" as the st | toxic | en |
Fear
OH MY GOD I'M SO SCARED. User::Scobell302, I AM SO SORRY, PLEASE DON'T BLOCK ME!!
Oops, now I'm gonna get extra-super-duper-blocked for baiting. | toxic | en |
okay seriously wtf is going on with the Thread Count section? Who in god's name wrote it and how can we stop them from writing anything else ever?==
== | toxic | en |
What point of view is intended to be projected about the Guantanamo Bay detention camps?
Why is the mentioning of specific uses inappropriate for this article? | toxic | en |
"
Help Re-Writing Page: Zona Plus (you deleted)
Hello! Can you please tell me how the Zona Plus article you deleted could be improved so that it is not viewed as advertising? The ""Zona Plus"" is a patented, copwrtied, FDA cleared device. We got the impression from this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resperate that ours would be okay. Would it be better if we wrote an article on ""isometric handgrip therapy"" which noted Zona Plus as the brand name, much like Fluoxetine and Prozac? Any help you can offer would be greatly appreciated! " | toxic | en |
Canada has hit a new low With refugees wherever you go. All the migrants they've tolerated And the felons they've exonerated Under the "leadership" of Justin Trudeau. | adult_sexism | en |
"::: Honestly, They aren't really experimental. They're your standard thrash/groove metal outfit with hints of proggressive. Experimental/Avant-Garde applies more to bands like Arcturus, Age of Silence, Manes, and Naked City. It has a in-distinct sound, were as Meshugga has a mix of styles that have already been in use. This is why I suggest removing the ""Experimental"" label ans include the genres this band represents: Progressive metal, Groove metal, Death metal, Thrash metal.
" | toxic | en |
P.S. You don't think it is worth mentioning that there is a suggestion (probably not more than that) that Homo erectus (Peking Man) might already have been befriending a canid/wolf species before Modern Humans began their co-evolution with the dog? The evidence for a proper Hominin-dog relationship at that early stage is probably very thin, but it is intriguing nevertheless, and it is something that I would certainly mention if I were revising the article. Just a thought. | toxic | en |
Will God punish Soros just as he punished the prideful egyptian king in exodus? Or have we forsaken God into Apathy? | adult_sexism | en |
Image requested|people|people of Japan | toxic | en |
"
Public economics
Yes, I think that's probably right: because the courses I know are called that: alternatively you could have ""economics of the public sector"" like some books. Either way, page just needs more writing! Best, " | toxic | en |
Updating
This table should be updated since it's a year old... what's the easiest way to go about doing this? ~ | toxic | en |
This is for you nonsense! | toxic | en |
Okay. Thank You.
&, I really do mean that; if my recollection is correct, then that would be the kindest message that you've ever sent to me. Although, I have seen you write kindly to others. &, you've written many messages to me, &, yet more, far more, about me. And I doubt ever calculating how many times that you've deleted me. I do perceive this as a real start. Have I ever complimented one of your messages previously??
Now, as to my original question: Is there a way to access the original photograph page? I do know that frequently those pages would include source-data for the other webpages, from whence the images had been derived.
Thank You. | toxic | en |
@littlelouie33 eh, take off hoser. | toxic | en |
"
Gameplay
There is much more info on the Starbound Wiki if anyone is interested, I have created the ""Playable Races"" section also. ""Aven"" Zhang" | toxic | en |
"
I'd also agree that ""crackdown"" is not clearly a weaker or milder term than persecutution. http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/meast/07/25/iran.world.protests/ for instance refers to the post-election events in Iran as a crackdown and certainly doesn't seem intended to minimize those events. " | toxic | en |
, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
If I made some error, then why can't someone explain it to me on the Talk page? I am not pushing a POV.
I edited an inflammatory sentence about a Jewish issue in the Schlafly biography page. I think that the sentence is anti-Jewish, but you may have your own opinion. Maybe you think the sentence is pro-Jewish. Either way, the sentence is contrary to WP BLP policy and must be removed immediately, unless it is reliably sourced.
The source is a paragraph in a NY Times book review by a Jewish columnist. Schlafly did not write the book in question, and Schlafly is not Jewish. The book is not about Jews. The paragraph is not backed up by anything. The paragraph is partially explained by the fact that columnist is Jewish and likes to write about Jewish issues. The paragraph is a criticism of the book, and not a criticism of Schlafly.
I think that the sentence is too unsupported and too far removed and too strange to even be included in an article about Schlafly. But if it is going to be there, then it should stick to what the NY Times columnist said. I believe that the sentence in dispute implies something about Schlafly that is not stated in the NY Times book review. That is what I argued on the Talk page, and no one rebutted that argument.
Blocking me is just a way to put a false and defamatory allegation about a living person in a WP article. It is wrong, and those who put this Jew-related allegation in should be blocked, not me. 16:19 | toxic | en |
google incel terminology | adult_sexism | en |
No, it doesn't. That's what NPOV is all about. | toxic | en |
"
Name
The article states that ""He adopted the surname ""Denver"" after the capital of his favorite state,""; however, New Zealand singer John Denver Hore toured the US in the 1960s using the name ""John Denver"", and met John Deutschendorf, who told him he liked the named and asked if he could use it; see, e.g.,
John Hore released his first album in 1964 after winning a TV talent contest and touring with the Miss New Zealand show. He travelled to the United States in 1965 where he used the name John Denver (Denver was his middle name.) He allowed another artist (John Deutschendorf) to use the name when he left the States. In the 1980s he returned to the US and used the name John Grenell ..." | toxic | en |
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Weight, you may be blocked from editing. - Please use the talk page to discuss this. | toxic | en |
:::PS: BTW, I always went to TFOWR for whenever this vandal strikes, but he's been out for quite some time now due to offline real life events. - | | contribs | toxic | en |
OK. I'm just going to try to wrap up with the articles I've listed so far. There are many more, but I've at least have a good sampling for the checkuser. | toxic | en |
"{| style=""background-color:#F5FFFA; padding:0;"" cellpadding=""0""
|class=""MainPageBG"" style=""border:1px solid #084080; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top; color:#000000; font-size:85%""|
Hello ! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Also, please feel free to drop by my talk page to ask any questions or even just to say hi. Good luck!
{| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#F5FFFA;""
|class=""MainPageBG"" style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""|
Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions
Where to ask questions or make comments
Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources
Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research
What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons
Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry
Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy
External links • Spam • Vandalism
Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability
|class=""MainPageBG"" style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""|
{| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""0"" cellspacing=""5"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA""
! The Community
|-
|style=""color:#000""|
Build consensus • Resolving disputes
Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette
[[Wikipedi | toxic | en |
view declaration edit summary]}} | toxic | en |
"For disambig purposes, would anyone know if the Jupiter locomotive is named after the Planet Jupiter or the Roman God? 17:21, 2005 Jun 9 (UTC)" | toxic | en |
I figured it out. You (correctly) db tagged Whitelightsyndrome, which was then copied to White Light Syndrome (Band). I tagged that one for notability & then the db a minute later. I'm going to reapply db-band. I did the notability a little earlier in an effort to avoid biting. Thanks for the quick reply! | toxic | en |
"
:The problem, as I see it, is that there is no connection between these two inventions. They seem related, but the Polynkin technique uses lasers to thermally ionize the air, while the Hettinger patent mentions a ""searchlight beam or ultraviolet light"" which, if it worked at all, would work by photoionization. Even if this is overlooked, there is no source saying they are related. As has been pointed out on this page before, concluding that two ideas are related without a source for it is synthesis. The Hettinger patent is 100 years old, it is a primary source, and there is no evidence it was ever demonstrated experimentally. " | toxic | en |
== Removal of unsourced prisoner reoffending statistic ==
I have removed the following claim about prisoner reoffending because it was not sourced and seems unlikely to be true; please return it if a valid source can be found.
*Adult inmates who received educational services while in prison had a 16% chance of returning to prison, as opposed to 70% for those who received no instruction.
A cut in the rate of reoffending from 70% to 16% by simple literacy training seems more hopeful than truthful. There appears to be some political bias in this article, of which this line was indicative. I'm adding a POV check tag for the time being. | toxic | en |
Don't offtop, Are those cities in Ukraine or Belarus now? Yes Belastok and Peremyshl were seen as Soviet territory by Soviet Union only and were ceded to Poland on a ethnical and national border that the whole world recognised... | toxic | en |
Why thank you BW. Don't worry though, I've seen enough abuse on my accusers user pages to release that slandering people with a different point of view is their modus operandi. I shall continue to press my view that the death/injured count must be included on the PIRA page - regardless of the personal attacks. | toxic | en |
"== I have a suggestion ==
Why don't we start another article that can be accessed from the ""See Also"" link at the bottom of the page (or possibly referenced by a link somewhere in the main article) that would lead to an article that covers all of the theories and opinions from the Michael-killed-Terri-and-bought-the-judiciary school.
Both the Project Apollo and Earth articles have similar separate pages to cover the Flat Earth theories and Apollo moon landing hoax accusations and they are the perfect analog to the dichotomy we are seeing in the talk page concerning the Terri Schiavo article.
In the main article we would pretty much follow what we already have, which is mostly supported by cites to court orders, affidavits, transcripts, reports, and articles, and in the subsidiary article we could lay out all the alternative theories and whatever support they can provide.
That way, the anti-Terri people could advance their POV that Michael must have killed Terri because Judge Greer has the same first name as Attorney Felos or whatever their theory is. The rest of us who attempt to practice NPOV (we all have a POV—the trick is to try and minimize it) can polish up the article and eliminate some of the convoluted narrative that POV pushers have forced us to contrive.
Note that the comments on the peer review page have found the article to be generally quite NPOV. The suggestions that were made were primarily form and not more or less POV.
:If you think my pages are conspiracy theories, then put them at that link. Here are some links you may find helpful, Duck:
:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Terri_Schiavo/archive24#Here_are_some_links_that_you_may_find_helpful
::Holy crap. There is a major difference between putting up a flat-earth conspiracy article on wikipedia and a ""Michael-killed-Terri-and-bought-the-judiciary"" conspiracy article on wikipedia that you're forgetting: Wikipedia can't get sued for libel/defamation for saying the earth is flat, but it can get sued for saying Michael murdered Terri. At some point, the Iyer affidavit has to be tossed out as utter crap. Wikipedia should report it as Iyer's POV, but wikipedia should also report all the surrounding pieces around it that show a complete lack of any supporting evidence. To allow wikipedia to start reporting on every crackpot conspiracy theory that any jerkoff puts on his blog is (1) asking for serious legal trouble and (2) giving credence to utter crap conspiracy theories. Any idiot with a blog can put his conspiracy theory on his blog. Wikipedia can add nothing to that other than to give such a blog free advertising. I also imagine that every single sentence will have to start with the phrase ""so and so said"" followed by a URL. If ""so and so said"" is ever dropped, wikipedia becomes open to libel. At which point the only safe way to report some crackpot conspiracy theory on wikipedia would be to quote the site verbatim and you might as well let people find it on their own when they google ""Michael murdered Terri"". This is a really, really, bad idea.
:::Your personal attacks are very tiresome, Duckecho & FuelWagon. If you want a ""flat-earther"" type conspiracy article, then it should be about those who think that Terri's mother, father, brother, sister, best friend, etc., who fought to save her life, were ""Anti-Terri"" (rather than the estranged husband who she had wanted to divorce, and who sought her death and forbade that she receive any kind of meaningful therapy for more than a dozen years, and who was quoted in sworn testimony by a disinterested caregiver as complaining, in her presence, ""when is that bitch gonna die?"").
:::If you want a ""flat-earther"" type conspiracy article, then it should be about those who actually claim to believe that literally dozens of physicians, nurses, nurse, family members, and friends, most of whom had no plausible motive for dishonesty, conspired to lie about Terri's condition, falsely claiming that she was responsive, that she tried to talk, that she ate and obviously enjoyed Jell | toxic | en |
What evidence have you given me that you assume good faith and that I should respect that? Considering you just came here, instantly reverted my edits then disappeared until I posted a message criticising you changing the article to your version then disappearing. | toxic | en |
:I think all citations should be moved outside punctuation per WP:FOOT#Style_recommendations. | toxic | en |
I added a comment made by one of the editors in question they had posted on their talkpage with use of the word we and personal knowledge of the situation to say that they had a COI and a COI only without specifics, it is still being said it's a violation of WP:OUTING which I don't understand can you answer my question there and explain it to me? If I'm off base with the second one I really need to know how if I am not to repeat it in the future, the first one I do understand and agree it should be RevDel'd but I did make every attempt to make the second something useable to at least say we had a COI using comments from the user made on their talkpage. I would appreciate some guidance in this issue if I'm off base. | toxic | en |
Yo admins can u please unblock me
plz plz (
wat did i do wrong? | toxic | en |
What can possibly explain Mad Theresa's new assault on Russian integrity? Distraction politics perhaps? But in their desperation her people are beginning to make embarrassing mistakes. [URL] | adult_sexism | en |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.