text
stringlengths 1
299k
| label
stringclasses 4
values | lang
stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|---|
Thank you for experimenting with the page Kansas-Nebraska Act on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me.
|
toxic
|
en
|
Re: Slaughter in the Name of God
On Tue, 2002-09-17 at 11:16, Gary Lawrence Murphy wrote:
> >>>>> "J" == Justin Mason <jm@jmason.org> writes:
>
> J> What about Tibetan Buddhism BTW? They seem like an awfully
> J> nice bunch of chaps (and chapesses).
>
> Yes, them too. When wolves attack their sheep, they coral the wolf
> into a quarry and then throw rocks from the surrounding cliffs so
> that "no one will know who killed the wolf"
>
> In Samskar, before the Chinese arrived, there had not been a killing
> in over 2000 years, and the last recorded skirmish, over rights to
> a water hole, had happened several generations ago.
I'm skeptical.
One of the many perversions of modern civilization is the fictitious
rendering of various peoples, frequently to the point where the fiction
is more "real" than the reality. You see it over and over again in
history: The Primitive People pull a fast one on Whitey The Junior
Anthropologist, playing to all the prejudices of Whitey (who only became
Junior Anthropologists to support personal ideologies), and before you
know it the charade takes on a life of its own which the Primitive
People are compelled to perpetuate. Worse, even when there is
substantial evidence to the contrary with some basic scholarship, the
facts have a hard time competing with the ideologically pleasing fiction
that is already firmly entrenched. And many peoples (e.g. American
Indians) develop a profit motive for maintaining and promoting the myth
in popular culture.
I'm far more inclined to believe that people is people, no matter where
you are on the planet. The only time you see any anomalies is when you
have a self-selecting sub-population within an otherwise normal
population, which is hardly a fair way to look at any major population.
-James Rogers
jamesr@best.com
|
scam
|
en
|
:When small cabals of people make decisions that affect everyone without consulting them first, why are you surprised at a backlash? And thanks for pointing out my spelling mistake in such a snarky manner - that is an excellent way to depersonalize a conversation in a less emotional way.
:Btw, I can think of several options that would be preferable to defacating date autoformatting, and I'd be happy to mention them if I thought it had a chance of reversing the current mess. And if they really don't want people to use autoformatting for all the litany of reasons you gave, wouldn't it be simpler to just turn it off completely? As long as it works, I'm going to keep using it,and keep formatting for it, as that's what I prefer. -
|
toxic
|
en
|
==Chennai==
Hi, Thanks for fixing MoS issues with Chennai. I've gone through the article to fix other occurrences of the issues you had sampled. Could you take a look again to see if there are other problems? Thanks.
|
toxic
|
en
|
"
Ethnic Taiwanese Imperial Japan Serviceman
I noticed you were working on the above new article, and I tried to make some edits to improve (in my opinion) the grammar and other things, but since you are still making changes yourself, there were edit conflicts. So, I have decided to wait.
If after you're happy with the article, you would like me to look over it and perform a copy edit, please reply on my talk page and I'll be happy to do so. This isn't meant as a criticism of your spelling or grammar, just one or two issues of style that I feel I could help with. talkstalk "
|
toxic
|
en
|
I think the above comment was us, in fact. I am you. Truthfully. XD
|
toxic
|
en
|
"
It is a little disturbing
(or maybe it's just too late at night) to see that the 30 or so edits that I made for this article did not get carried over when it was redirected. Well the edits got transfered, just the credit got left behind. Well it's okay I guess, 'casue as folks here never get tired of telling me, ""It's NOT your article. "
|
toxic
|
en
|
"
Conceptual art
Hi there. Can I ask a quick question about this diff: . You say that we need a reference in English. Are you sure that this is correct? I thought that a reliable source could be in any language and that English is only preferable for ease of verification. Is it that you feel that the specific phrase ""living art museum"" can't be substantiated unless translated into English by the RS itself? Google Translate seems to support the translation, although I know this is not always foolproof. Maybe it is worth have another quick look at it? "
|
toxic
|
en
|
schedule crawler : hourahead failure
start date : 1 / 21 / 02 ; hourahead hour : 5 ; hourahead schedule download failed . manual intervention required .
log messages :
parsing file - - > > o : \ portland \ westdesk \ california scheduling \ iso final schedules \ 2002012105 . txt
error : dbcaps 97 data : cannot perform this operation on a closed database
! ! ! unknown database .
alias : dbcaps 97 data
! ! ! unknown database .
alias : dbcaps 97 data
! ! ! unknown database .
alias : dbcaps 97 data
error : dbcaps 97 data : cannot perform this operation on a closed database
! ! ! unknown database .
alias : dbcaps 97 data
! ! ! unknown database .
alias : dbcaps 97 data
! ! ! unknown database .
alias : dbcaps 97 data
error : dbcaps 97 data : cannot perform this operation on a closed database
! ! ! unknown database .
alias : dbcaps 97 data
! ! ! unknown database .
alias : dbcaps 97 data
error : dbcaps 97 data : cannot perform this operation on a closed database
error : dbcaps 97 data : cannot perform this operation on a closed database
error : dbcaps 97 data : cannot perform this operation on a closed database
! ! ! unknown database .
alias : dbcaps 97 data
! ! ! unknown database .
alias : dbcaps 97 data
! ! ! unknown database .
alias : dbcaps 97 data
! ! ! unknown database .
alias : dbcaps 97 data
! ! ! unknown database .
alias : dbcaps 97 data
! ! ! unknown database .
alias : dbcaps 97 data
error : dbcaps 97 data : cannot perform this operation on a closed database
|
scam
|
en
|
Another look at Juaquin James Malphurs (Waka Flocka Flame)
Is there some point at which we can agree that a person may have said they were running for president, but they aren't really doing so? I'm thinking primarily of Waka Flocka Flame in regard to this, but I suspect Dan Bilzerian falls into this category too. Neither one has filed a Statement of Candidacy with the FEC yet. (talk)
|
toxic
|
en
|
"== Sources ==
In view of the fact that ""thou"" continues in use in parts of England, it would be nice to see a source to support this sentence: ""Thou had almost gone out of usage entirely in most English dialects by the year 1650.""
I would guess that in 1650, in the very early days of the expansion of English around the world, most English dialects were confined to England. If ""thou"" had almost gone out of usage in these dialects, it seems odd that the modern use of ""thou"" now only continues, apparently, in England, where it was virtually extinct 350 years earlier. Has its level of usage been unchanged (restricted mostly to Yorkshire) since 1650? Any clarification from reliable sources would be welcome.
"
|
toxic
|
en
|
"
re: your message
Hi, I've left a reply to your message on my talk page . "
|
toxic
|
en
|
I can't take you serious if you wear colored contacts.
|
toxic
|
en
|
Whether the response was notble in-and-of-itself is both disputed and irrelevant to this article; it was not notable vis-a-vis Ahmadinejad himself. Neither did he make this apology/spin/explanation, nor does he make any reference to this apology/spin/explanation. In the article on HIM, it does not belong in the lead, but it belongs in the detatiled discussion of that statement.
|
toxic
|
en
|
"
IIRC, the word ""prestigious"" was used and is clearly POV. I tend to agree with that opinion but it remains opinion and thus POV. "
|
toxic
|
en
|
Ground rules
Ground rules
# Please keep all comments focused on the mediation. Proper editing decorum must be maintained, and as such, incivility and personal attacks must not occur, and I reserve the ability to archive, refactor or remove comments of such nature.
Who gets to be on this page is up to the moderator, ie user:Mr Stradivarius.Who gets to revert edits on this page is up to the moderator, ie 'user:Mr Stradivarius'. So stop it, It is disappointing. ( talk)
|
toxic
|
en
|
"
I saw that reference, and I added a note (see note 10) by the name ""republic"". "
|
toxic
|
en
|
"
, the Consensus is not ""removing the edit"", it is just the opposite:""protecting the edit""
15.10.2014:07.43: I added Arbitration Committee's decision ""The Arbitration Committee, in their infinite wisdom, determined that Cyprus does not fall under WP:ARBMAC discretionary sanction"" to Talk page of Northern Cyprus (to let Wiki users edit via keeping this in mind)
15.10.2014:07.48: Dr.K. immediately removed resulting decision of Arbitration Committee from Talk page of Northern Cyprus.
........
15.10.2014:07.47: also reverted my edit on Northern Cyprus in the pretext that ""edit-war against consensus. (The reality is just the opposite. See below:) "".
But, distorted again: He presented as if there is a consensus on removing the relevant material!
14.10.2014; 20.16: (my first edit) after my first edit
14.10.2014:20.30: an unkown IP31 reverted my edit vandalistically on the pretext that ""This is about a case a US court did not, actually hear."".
14.10.2014, 21.08: I then presented the USA Federal Court really heared the case and decided the verdict on Talk page. I have supplied USA Federal Court decision from the official website of the Court.
14.10.2014:21.42: Wikipedian Alexikoua reacted the unknown IP31's vandalism. (edit summary of Alexikoua: ""rv essential part removal""). Alexikoua is a Hellen, but neutral like me.
15.10.2014:00.37: This time another unknown IP85 appeared and removed the edit without any edit summary. Hence, essentially removed the sourced context that Alexikoua opposes to be removed besides me.
15.10.2014:00.38: Wikipedian MelbourneStar reacted to the unknown IP85's vandalism and protected the edit.
15.10.2014:00.58: This time, appeared and reverted the edit with edit summary (Reverted 1 edit by MelbourneStar: Sorry Star. IP 31.xx was correct. Reverting undue POV-push by SPA. Please see Arbitration Enforcement report.) without waiting my defense in Arbitration Enforcement and the resulting decision of Arbitration Committee]].
15.10.2014:05.23: Arbitration Committee rejected
This section is to be edited only by uninvolved administrators. Comments by others will be moved to the section above.
The Arbitration Committee, in their infinite wisdom, determined that Cyprus does not fall under these discretionary sanctions. So unless I've missed something, this case is not currently actionable. (talk)
Agreed. Cyprus is not part of the Balkans and therefore not covered by the WP:ARBMAC discretionary sanctions. Closing as not actionable.
15.10.2014:07.45: I replace the edit whose protection is the consensus of the known Wiki users (Alexikoua,MelbourneStar).
15.10.2014:07.47: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Northern_Cyprus&diff;=next&oldid;=629683076 Dr.K. reverte
|
toxic
|
en
|
FA review?
Hello,
I noticed that you are involved with the physics articles on Wikipedia, and I was wondering if you could help me out. Right now, I'm working to bring the article AdS/CFT correspondence to FA status. So far, people have had many good suggestions and many positive things to say about the article, but I'm having trouble getting people to support or oppose the nomination.
I was wondering if you'd be willing to take a look at it and tell us your thoughts at this page. Please note that you do not have to be an expert on the subject. The article has already been checked quite carefully by other reviewers, and at this point, I'm just looking for people who can check that it meets the FA criteria.
Please let me know if you're interested. Thanks.
|
toxic
|
en
|
"
==More original research==
The talk page was actually more enlightening than the article, although that may be for lack of citations. To be honest, I cannot think of a Wikipedia-acceptable way to bring across into the article the points made in the talk page. Perhaps appropriate studies could be found in sports sociology or sports psychology journals? or maybe even anthropology journals?
On an objective level, the World Cup recently demonstrated to all of us some reasons why high scores over other teams might be necessary to advancement. For example, had Portugal-Brazil not ended in a tie in the Group of Death, the number of points scored over Korea DPR would have become highly relevant. This reason is loosely covered in the article (list), but I would suggest it is actually one of the least relevant points overall in the psychology of the thing.
What became strongly apparent in these discussion threads, in trying to explain cultural differences, was that in the United States and to a lesser extent Canada (especially in American football), it is considered dishonourable for a hugely dominant team to keep pushing hard, while in Britain/Europe/Australia (not enough opinions from elsewhere), it is considered dishonourable for *every* team not to push as hard as possible.
I notice that the question becomes most relevant in ""national"" sports - American football and basketball for the United States, Association football and cricket for Great Britain, hockey and curling for Canada. I bring in curling, because this has a built-in international mercy rule allowing concession if any team falls more than eight points behind, the absolute maximum that can be scored in a single end (and almost always never is). In both hockey and curling you are required to go all out, always, but only curling gives an 'out'. (Canadians, too, tend to become upset with teams that declare future certainties although much more so with non-Canadian teams. In the United States, not so much in many cases it is seen as simply a statement of fact, but it must be achieved ""honourably"".) American baseball, I would suggest, has different unspoken rules because, unlike American football, American baseball is financially designed to create long-lasting powerhouse dynasties.
The psychology of the thing does seem to be rooted in cheering for the underdog vs the assumption that if you lose, you deserve to lose and you need to get better (or get moved to a different conference). Much of the commentary re the British FIFA team was that if they did not advance, they had better not come home. In contrast, much of the commentary re the American FIFA team noted that United States teams tended to do best where they were rated the underdogs, but fell short against much less powerful teams.
Just as interesting to me is whose responsibility it is to keep the game ""fair"" and/or ""fun"", whatever the definition. In American football fixed divisions, United States commentators seem to place all the responsibility on the coach. European commentators, on the other hand, seem to place more responsibility for even matches on the association, per the Zimbabwe example above. (If they keep losing badly, the association will place them into a more appropriate level.) This frees the coach from all other responsibilities except to win.
All this comes from the discussion on this page only, in the context of various sports wins. Yet it cannot move onto the main article page, not in its current form. How does one cite tacit cultural assumptions and unspoken custom? - Tenebris"
|
toxic
|
en
|
"
You deleted page ""Assassination plots in the Three Kingdoms''
05:45, 28 June 2012 Sandstein (talk | contribs) deleted page Assassination plots in the Three Kingdoms (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Assassination plots in the Three Kingdoms)
Assassination plots in the Three Kingdoms contains the list of assassinations plots of a novel named
Romance of the Three Kingdoms, and I guess you, Sandstein have never read it.
If you did not read this novel, you DEFINTELY do not have right to delete that page.
The main reason is this; there is tousand and millions readers of this novel, and they did not determin
to delete that page, yet. I now think that you, who have never read it, determineed to delete it.( )
I first dare ask you to answer to ask whether or not You really have read it."
|
toxic
|
en
|
Ellen Ripley
The article reads:
Ripley develops an intimate relationship with Clemens, revealing her first named for the first time in the series.
Not so. We learn Ripley's first name in Aliens, in a scene that was missing from the theatrical release, but was seen widely before the release of the third film. So, this statement is simply false.
|
toxic
|
en
|
"
He was ""Bruce"" when married to Kris Jenner, so I see no reason to introduce content that will likely lead to confusion regarding both subjects. The redirect at Bruce Jenner points to the new article location for Caitlyn, so there should be no issue as to how its listed in this article. (Talk) ☮ღ☺ "
|
toxic
|
en
|
"
Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Joshurtree for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. "
|
toxic
|
en
|
"
Yes, someone recently removed it. – (talk) "
|
toxic
|
en
|
Piers Morgan doesn't trump everybody else. –
|
toxic
|
en
|
Thanks Bill
Thanks for the fix to the variant section, so much my for cut and paste
|
toxic
|
en
|
Perhaps to blow your fucking worthless, useless libscum head off, fool! Slink away to mommies basement and leave war to the the warriors! You're just collateral damage and nobody cares!
|
adult_sexism
|
en
|
Hello Setanta, can I ask you what you think of the proposal first put forward by Matt Lewis in July at Template talk:Country data Northern Ireland. I confess I am no expert on N.Ireland, but I believe this could solve the problem of N.Ireland having no flag to represent it on wiki. I have made a comment at that article. Cheers.
|
toxic
|
en
|
Yes, it IS ridculous because you are apparently allowing a court case to control what is published in a wikipedia document. That's insane.
:::::::::
|
toxic
|
en
|
Person A: Hey, how's it going? Person B: It's been great, thanks. Just attended a theater play and it was a captivating and dramatic experience. How about you? Person A: I'm doing fine. I've been practicing yoga in my free time. Person B: That sounds relaxing! What kind of yoga have you been doing? Person A: I've been practicing hatha and vinyasa, it's been quite rejuvenating. Person B: That's really wonderful. I'd love to join you for a yoga session sometime. Person A: Definitely! We can do yoga together. So, any plans for the upcoming weekend? Person B: I'm considering a visit to a local zoo for some wildlife appreciation and relaxation. Person A: That sounds delightful! I might join you for that. Person B: Absolutely, it'll be a great animal experience. Looking forward to it. Well, I should get back to work. Person A: Sounds good. Have a productive day, talk to you later. Person B: You too, take care and have a great day! Person A: Thanks, bye!
|
scam
|
en
|
"
Plot of Dragon Ball
Have you ever seen Dragon Ball. You write errors and undo my corrections and do some tweaking based on my writing. The plot needs lot's of work and I may have gone in too much detail but you leave out what made Dragon Ball what it is today. By the way Cell didn't absorb the entire Red Ribbon Army.
(talk
First, the plot summary is based on the manga, not the anime. The anime is a secondary work. Your writing is full of grammatical errors and makes little sense, here or in the article. Your additions added excessive minute details that were unnecessary. If there is an actual factual error, please point it out, but do not just keep putting in badly written stuff. (talk · contribs) "
|
toxic
|
en
|
*See also Wikipedia is not here to tell the world about your noble cause. The links in the Welcome message at the top of this page will tell you more about Wikipedia.
|
toxic
|
en
|
"
I told you that I had reverted an anti-BCE switch (once or twice) before, but you were cynical about it. I found it: (notice the date). No, rest assured, I don't want some stupid medal and I don't want some apology. I just like to be honest in such matters and I don't like when someone doesn't trust my word for it. PS: I'm still waiting for a fair resolution in the Germanic Wars. No one seems to have offered any reasonable reason at all for a change towards BCE/CE. It seems that the changer made it to show somebody else ""to point out that one could harmonize either way"" and IMHO that's not a proper reason.
:I see. One time you changed one instance of BC/BCE to BCE. Bravo! Regarding the Germanic Wars, the issue is resolved. Your anti BCE/CE campaign is now officially over, so you're done there. If you want to add historical material to the article, feel free, but no more era changes. Please try to recognize that your obsession with this notation and these changes, and insistence that it's not ""fair"" is part of the problem. If an article has mixed notation, it's not your problem any more: you've been relieved of that burden. Now you need to step away, and focus on things like actual article content instead. "
|
toxic
|
en
|
''' 01:00, 31 July 2010 (UTC
|
toxic
|
en
|
Thank you for experimenting with the page Koala on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
|
toxic
|
en
|
I haven't seen any such explicit prohibition in all the Arbcom discussions, nor in the resulting naming convention guideline, which are the last deliberations on it. This discussion, in its wider aspects, is continuing in the naming convention talk page. There is no such policy in place for someone to need to change or prove. And there is more than ample examples of its historical usage with top level reliable sources to warrant its mention.
|
toxic
|
en
|
Miley moved to England and renounced her US citizenship as I remember...
|
adult_sexism
|
en
|
Another Wikipedia guideline for you to read: assume good faith. Also, for you to compare: Shrikhande's, Nash-Williams', your, and my publication records in Google scholar. I realize that MathSciNet might be a better choice of database for mathematicians, but my own work is not primarily in the math literature and the pattern there is in any case not very different. The point is that for Shrikhande and Nash-Williams I can see clear evidence of notability just from the Google scholar citation counts. For you I can't, and would need some other justification for having an article here. That's why I removed the redlink. —
|
toxic
|
en
|
I think that this basically says the obvious: that the rest of the article also needs some rewriting and reorganizing. I think that if you believed that the previous lead gave a clear description of evolution for the layperson, you are sadly mistaken. I could probably find quite a few editors who would agree with me as well on this point. It is fine to get technical and fancy, but do it in the body. The lead should tell you what the article is about. Most people will read no farther. It should not include every bit of detail and minutae possible. If another section needs to be written so the reader understands the basics, then write one and include it. If the history section clogs it up too much, spin it off into a separate article. What you had before did not explain things for you. It was an awful mess, to be frank.
|
toxic
|
en
|
"
Now almost certain it is the same person, as he/she has just blanked the page of | Talk "
|
toxic
|
en
|
"
IRA Bodycount
Given the popularity of ""bodycount"" sites now on the internet, perhaps it would be a good idea to have an ""IRA Bodycount"" section in this page. It could have columns for children, women, etc murdered by the IRA plus a column for IRA members blown up making their own improvised explosive devices. The total could include figures for the bogus-front successor organisations like Continuity IRA and so forth. How about also putting in little corpse symbols for each type of corpse? This would form an excellent introduction to the proposed Wikiproject IRA above. "
|
toxic
|
en
|
Leopard Tortoise FPC
This is what i mean by an 'average shot'. I am a photographer, and I don't really find anything in the photo that would make it anything special from many others. The use of flash rid the turtle of any contrast and washed out the colors while created dark shadows under the shell. The composition is pretty average, all I can say about it is that you centered the turtle. It looks like you just relied on the auto settings on the camera and got lucky. All in all, it's a photo anyone could have taken.
|
toxic
|
en
|
@Pepper_Redbone @Yankees @Mets Oh yeah. And the annoying damn duck calls?? They outta be banned. Duck horns??
|
toxic
|
en
|
In an effort to proactively put this entire issue to rest I have asked 2/0 to weigh in on whether he considered his block to be part of the Climate Change Probation, or not. See . I don't care how he responds. If he says yes, then Ncmvocalist's changes are fine. If he says no, then I maintain that Ncmvocalist's moving the one sanction to the Climate Change Log should be undone. I don't care where in WP:RESTRICT things are actually logged, so if Ncmvocalist want's to break them up into two sections that is fine.
|
toxic
|
en
|
"
I don't think our text is entirelyh in line with the quotes Doc James provided above from the source ... we've made a blanket statement that there is little evidence, when the paper states there is no data on ... other issues ... or problems with attrition in studies ... could we make our wording more in line with the precise wording in the source? We've also used ""recommend"" for APA when the paper uses the word ""suggest"" ... subtle but important difference ... sorry to hammer on this, but considering public cases of people who ended up dead when medications were discontinued w/schizophrenia, I believe we need to hold very close to the sources here. (Talk) "
|
toxic
|
en
|
">
I've decided to start an ""article in need of attention of the week"" (or day, or month, depending on how many come along). The first one is suitable for septics and greenies alike: Runaway climate change. Don't discuss it here; do it there.
Anyone competent is invited to fix up my cr*ppy div style; even better, point me to an explanation of the syntax.
|
toxic
|
en
|
Tie break?
There are no less than four sets of politicians first elected at the same time - what's the tiebreaker? Did some have periods out of the Dail or is it based on when they take an oath or something?
|
toxic
|
en
|
Jewish vegetarianism
I would suggest that a new article is created titled Jewish vegetarianism. Much more information is now available since the article was deleted in 2006. See Jewish Vegetarians of North America, A Sacred Duty (film), pamphlet from PETA, a rabbic thesis and If This Is Kosher... by Jonathan Safran Foer. Comments pleased.
|
toxic
|
en
|
Dear, anonymous poster...it's NOT on the list! PWI begins the WCW World Title's existence as of January 11 1991. But Stine had a WCW World Title reign BEFORE that. I understand why they don't recognize the ECW World Title before mid-1999, but why not the original WCW World Title before January 11 1991. Strange indeed! 41.245.129.121
|
toxic
|
en
|
"::Hey I posted my fave B&B; characters on MF's talk page, sorry just don't feel like copying them down again lol. Thank you MF my god I always hated Bill and Katie together. I'm starting to hate Heather Tom but I still love Katie P I love Don Diamont too just hated him on Y&R.; Highly doubt he got better from when I watched in the 80s. Maura was Diane Jenkins? Really? I remember her from Y&R; back in the early 80s. She was some slut who was portrayed by some Donnelley girl. I totally can't picture Maura as Diane. Eeew! Anyway if you're fearing the future for GH then I won't start watching again. I wanted to get back into it this year but if it's still crummy storylines then screw it lol. BTW is Leslie Charleston still on GH?? Didn't she portray like someone named Monica or something?? Yeah I hate The Talk. It was such a poor replacement for ATWT, if they wanted to cancel it then the actors can just come to my house and perform the soap for me on the spot!!! lol. I hate Sharon Osbourne and that random girl from Roseanne. Anyway, get back to me!! I love chatting with you it brightens up my day ) Talk?
"
|
toxic
|
en
|
Please do not delete
Hi, I am animeking237, please do not delete my entries. If you need to contact me, animeking237@aol.com or animeking237 on yim or aim!
|
toxic
|
en
|
Man talk to em Of course nothing is wrong with applebee’s if you like trash food.
|
toxic
|
en
|
I will cme i want to go to hos 2morow. After that i wil cme. This what i got from her dear what to do. She didnt say any time
|
scam
|
en
|
Shouldnt he be a runner up with Monico?
|
toxic
|
en
|
REDIRECT Talk:Wollert Konow (merchant)
|
toxic
|
en
|
Ok, so now we have news. The South African atheletics association has admitted that it knew Semenya would fail a gender test before going to Berlin. So must we still have doubt that Semenya is intersexed?
|
toxic
|
en
|
"
Matt
Hi there. Yes his blocking would prevent him from making a statement for that, to the best of my knowledge. If you need his input then I'll unblock him, but if he continues his personal attacks then he runs the risk of being blocked again. talk "
|
toxic
|
en
|
"
When you were renamed ...
Did it lose some of your edits? [[User_talk:IMatthew|talk]] at "
|
toxic
|
en
|
"
==Thanks!!!==
Well folks, thanks to your reviews and comments, the Fightin' Texas Aggie Band is now a featured article on Wikipedia. It should take a day or so to update, but it's a done deal. Thanks for the help, . "
|
toxic
|
en
|
jfhjdf asdjfh djsfhjsnd jdnfjdfjdfjd
I love you
Your hot!!!
|
toxic
|
en
|
"
:It's more than that. You're violating Wikipedia's civility policy. I understand that it gets frustrating sometimes, but if an editor makes an edit you don't agree with then speak with that editor on his or her discussion page about their edits. If they're not appropriate, you've tried discussing it with them and they still continue to add them, then it's time to take it to administration. Calling other editors ""mother fuckers"" is only going to get you into trouble. Also, the section dealing with concert videos is accurate. Thug Angel - Life of an Outlaw is a legitimate video certified by the RIAA. The link provided in the references section will take you to every video certification he has. "
|
toxic
|
en
|
:::Okay, sorry, I should have been clearer. I want a link directly to the article which mentions ED. I have looked for sources, and I have found none; I'm not going to look more every time someone says they have one. -
|
toxic
|
en
|
"
It is all just terminology
Perhaps all this argument is about nothing but terminology. Does anyone disagree with any of the following statements? It is assumed throughout that the car is placed randomly, the players initial pick is random, and that the host always opens an unchosen door to reveal a goat.
1) The probability of winning by switching, given that the player has picked door 1 and the host has opened door 3, is between 1/2 and 1 depending on the hosts door preference. (This is clearly a conditional probability)
2) The probability of winning by switching, given that the player has picked door 1 and the host has opened door 2, is between 1/2 and 1 depending on the hosts door preference. (This is clearly a conditional probability)
3) The probability of winning by switching, given that the player has picked door 1 and the host has opened one of the unchosen doors, is 2/3 for all host preferences. (Morgan call this the unconditional case, maybe this is where the confusion arises).
4) The probability of winning by switching given that the player has picked a door and the host has opened one of the unchosen doors is 2/3 for all host preferences.
5) The probability of winning by switching on average for player who switch is 2/3 for all host preferences.
You're right. And notice that in case 3, opening one of the unchosen doors is not a condition, because it is part of the rules of the game. The only condition, if you would consider the full model, there is the initial picking of door 1. In case 4 there is no condition at all in the full model and hence it is the same as case 5. But ... notice that in the MHP a specific door has been chosen and a door opened.
I continue here. The difficulty is what we do mean by probability. If you mean an average over all cases in which any door has been opened, there is, as I mentioned, no condition. If you mean: a door has been opened, but I do not know which one, and I want to average over all cases concerning the same door, the answer depends on the door and is a number between 1/2 and 1.
I do not quite agree with you. If we average over all cases where a door has been opened, but you do not know which one, the answer is 2/3 if we include all possible host strategies in our average. The only way to get an answer other than 2/3 is to average over cases where the host has a fixed strategy and the same door is opened every time.
Nijdam, do you see the connection with my simple problem in which a prize is placed behind one of two doors and the player then picks a door? If the player picks randomly the probability of winning is 1/2. If the player has picked just one specific door then the probability of winning depends on the initial prize placement.
Who else agrees?
I agree with #1 and #2. I find #3, #4 and #5 somewhat ambiguous without further clarification, for example I don't know precisely what you mean by ""for all host preferences"". I would agree with the following revised versions:
By 'for all host preferences' I mean regardless of whether the host policiy is to: always open door 2 where possible, always open door 3 where possible, choose randomly where there is a choice, or employ any other method of deciding which door to open within the stated rules.
3) The probability of winning by switching, given that the player has picked door 1, is 2/3.
4) The probability of winning by switching, given that the player has picked a door, is 2/3.
5) The probability of winning by switching on average for players who switch is 2/3.
These are clearly ""unconditional"" statements that say nothing about the player deciding after the
|
toxic
|
en
|
The sententiae were so important that Justinian I. still praised their influence, regarding them as a genuine part of Lex Julia.
|
toxic
|
en
|
Movie removal from the Hans Zimmer page.
Sorry got to reply to you so late. I removed the film The Whole Wide World from Hans Zimmer's Filmography because IMDB's files on Hans Zimmer and the film did not listed him as one of the composers.
|
toxic
|
en
|
I didnât fully realize girls my age were having sex until I came here. Iâm only starting to pick up on conversations where I can hear chicks blabbering about sexual experiences theyâve had
|
adult_sexism
|
en
|
"
== Autograph Book ==
Hey, please sign my . Thanks "
|
toxic
|
en
|
REDIRECT Talk:Ministry of Petroleum and Energy (Norway)
|
toxic
|
en
|
"
::::With regard to A3 the article 1) has content.... That's really weird: I highlighted the relevant portions of the template text so you wouldn't be confused, yet you still cite the irrelevent sections as if they had some sort of connection with what I wrote. Maybe this confusion is related to your irrelevant application of vanity-bio standards to something which was not and has never been claimed by myself to be a vanity bio. It also casts doubt on your ability to recognize whether something ""clearly"" is not a speedy candidate, no?
::::For some object lessons, see:
::::*Wikipedia:Deletion review#Gigi Stone
::::*Wikipedia:Deletion review#John Scherer
::::the article is not linked from anywhere else.''' A sure sign of the subject's importance, eh?
::::Time for a sing-along!:
:::::Every sperm is sacred,
:::::Every sperm is great!
:::::If a sperm is wasted,
:::::God gets quite irate!''
| "
|
toxic
|
en
|
"
==NOR==
Thanks for the note! I'll try to take a look at it, but I'm going on vacation tomorrow and won't be back till Nov 11th or so. I'll try to check in while I'm gone. "
|
toxic
|
en
|
"
List
I have reverted the article back to a list of current MKs, rather than the party's list for the last elections. The latter is totally inappropriate, whilst the former matches most other party articles (which include lists of current MKs). The accusation that changing the section was ""blanking"" is somewhat dishonest. 57 "
|
toxic
|
en
|
Unblock
Jon, after I finish leaving this message, I'm going to unblock you with a warning that any disruptive editing on your part may be met by blocks. I'm also going to remove the sock puppet tag from your user page.
|
toxic
|
en
|
And what when you are being told that you will get 'blocked' if you post anything to ANI and many other boards?
|
toxic
|
en
|
"
:Thank you. I've updated it with new figures from your article. ALittle "
|
toxic
|
en
|
"
Islam in the Solomon Islands
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Islam in the Solomon Islands, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also ""What Wikipedia is not"" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add to the top of the page. Docg "
|
toxic
|
en
|
user zora, i have no interest in hearing what user moshe has to say, the best way to deal with people like her is to ignore them. Now once again you have reverted eminent to distinguished even after agreement. Because of this, like i said before there is no more discussion here, we already came to an agreement, and the word eminent stays, if bridesmill and moshe don't like that that's their problem.
Furthermore moshe i have repeatedly asked you to cooperate, again i have no hate for you and do not want to engage in a war here, but i will not let you vandalize it either. like we talk about it before why can't you just be like the russian-jewish sweet girl i had? lol:), same goes for bridesmill ).
|
toxic
|
en
|
Yes, parochial is when someone tries to enforce their own locally valid norms on a community governed by another set of norms pertaining to other localities which they make no attempt to try to understand. So, basically what you are doing right now. ·snunɐw·
|
toxic
|
en
|
:::::Massyparcer, the net income from ILO is not net.
|
toxic
|
en
|
tw cash for fuel issues
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - forwarded by lorraine lindberg / et & s / enron on
06 / 20 / 2000 04 : 03 pm - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
ramona betancourt
06 / 20 / 2000 02 : 04 pm
to : christine stokes / et & s / enron @ enron , jeffery fawcett / et & s / enron @ enron ,
lorraine lindberg / et & s / enron @ enron
cc : susan scott / et & s / enron @ enron , mary darveaux / et & s / enron @ enron , debbie
moseley / et & s / enron @ enron , sheila nacey / et & s / enron @ enron , lynn
blair / et & s / enron @ enron , julia white / et & s / enron @ enron , john
buchanan / et & s / enron @ enron , richard hanagriff / et & s / enron @ enron , elizabeth
brown / et & s / enron @ enron , david duff / et & s / enron @ enron , gerry
medeles / et & s / enron @ enron , steven harris / et & s / enron @ enron
subject : tw cash for fuel issues
christine ,
after our meeting last week , john , elizabeth , gerry , richard , dave & i
discussed various options related to this cash for fuel process . we had
several open issues that came up in our discussions and they are as follows :
regulatory / legal issue : can we have contract specific language on our firm
contracts that would prevent the firm shipper from releasing this fuel
discount cash option to an acquiring shipper ? if we must offer this
special cash option to the acquiring shipper we will need to build a process
to track this fuel option from the firm shipper to the releasing shipper .
this will require more system modifications that we have not accounted for at
this time .
shipper nomination issue : how will we handle shipper nomination line items
that are nominated as overrun paths on their firm contracts ? could we
default these " 02 " overrun transactions to calculate the fuel in kind using
our existing tariff fuel % ? this would make the process of trying to
reconcile the contracted mdq fuel volumes easier when we verify that the
volumes the shipper elected to pay in cash tie back to the total volumes
scheduled & paid for in cash . .
tariff sheet issue : when you state in the tariff provision that " the shipper
may use the cash for fuel option only if the posted point of sale is a
receipt point on shipper ' s service agreement " does this only apply to the
shipper ' s primary receipt points ?
i would appreciate it if you could respond to these issues . if you feel like
we should meet to discuss , i will be glad to set up another meeting . please
let me know .
thanks ramona
|
scam
|
en
|
"
No, the phrasing is wrong. ""Lying"" is the present participle of ""to lie"" - it's one of the painful ones consistently gotten wrong in English ) If she was currently continuing to lie to a jury then it can be used. But the lie being described is in the past. Hence ""She has lied"", not ""She was lying"". I don't see these as nitpicks either; many of the proposed phrase shortenings are due to you replaced past with present tense. On top of that I think we should aim for high quality writing! Now, I agree that some of the content (for example ""a nearby room following her encounter with Strauss-Kahn and had then returned to Strauss-Kahn's room and cleaned that as well"") could be better phrased to be clearer and shorter. But your mostly just removing material to no value leaving a lot of vagueness and some innacuracy. Errant (chat!)
"
|
toxic
|
en
|
"
why don´t you just get ""high""? if not, I will give every video a thumb down and write a bad comment... "
|
toxic
|
en
|
:::I prefer to only source things that are disputed, and not perfectly easy to find if one is not too stupid to use Google.
|
toxic
|
en
|
== February 2009 ==
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.
:If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
|
toxic
|
en
|
Ext Links
The external links section is overflowing and getting to the stage where it is of no use to anybody. If there are no sensible objections, in a few days i might clean it up so that only links that give the reader more info about psychotherapy are there, not all the ones telling the reader where to find a psychotherapist. This isn't the yellow pages.
|
toxic
|
en
|
strictly confidential
non - commercial chart to follow .
regards , nella
|
scam
|
en
|
OK, thanks. Will do.
|
toxic
|
en
|
What are you talking about? I did what?
|
toxic
|
en
|
Re: [SAdev] Scoring Yahoo Ads
Marc Perkel wrote:
> But - MY POINT IS - catching the phrase "risk-free" in the ad portion
> of a non-spam is not a false positive because those lines are
> technically spam
No. They. Are. Not.
Those lines are technically *advertising*.
Spam is unsolicited bulk *EMAIL*.
If you do not understand this, then lease kindly STFU.
Thanks,
rOD.
--
He gave his life for tourism.
>> Doing the blogging thang again at http://www.groovymother.com/ <<
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-devel mailing list
Spamassassin-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-devel
|
scam
|
en
|
American Open Wheel Racing
|
toxic
|
en
|
why did you remove 'Hyderabad,Pakistan' edit? Saying it started in india is misleading. The place where it started is currently in Pakistan. It is more accurate to specify the place.
|
toxic
|
en
|
"
== Glad to meet you to ==
Who made you the judge of worthy edits!? Sorry king dan, for offending you regal absolute authority of the FM2006 article. I added it in my infinite stupidity as in my ignorance of your authoritarian powers, thought it served as a useful note to anyone who clicks the link and wonders why the fuck its not working. Whats the point in adding injuries to wikipedia if people will just get better, whats the point of adding buildings to wikipedia if they'll just get knocked down, whats the point of adding smart alicky comments to my talk page, when all thats going to happen is I'll think you are obnoxius and inconsiderate. Hacking is a bit more serious than server overloads to be honest. So if you have something stupid and poorly thought through to say, keep it to your edit summaries, I don't need to hear it. Thank you in advance for not speaking to me again. C "
|
toxic
|
en
|
New name
based on this: this article should be named contrversy about using the term Apartheid in the context of the Israeli-paestinian conflict
|
toxic
|
en
|
Shit, I only showered once today. Guess I'm an asshole. And following the "logic" of "incels" and their larval stage "Nice Guys"^^TM , shouldn't that mean that women will be fighting with other to hop on your junk?
|
adult_sexism
|
en
|
To the Mag desi;
Look, we appreciate you support NUFC and as such are going to be bias in your reporting, but FFS this is an encyclopedia not a forum for your opinions. The Sunderland groundsman reactions, chants after derbies etc etc are utterly irrelevant.
You are not doing much to dispel the widely held opinion that Newcastle fans are uneducated, egotistical and absolutely unable to look at anything impartially.
|
toxic
|
en
|
":Well then there is one item I have to wait to talk about cause it is about the ending. I was impressed with the little physical traits of Thaw/Morse that Shaun Evans gave us. The tug of the collar etc. I also liked the fleshing out of some of the things in Morse's past that the original series had referred to over the years. I also like that we saw a young version of Max the pathologist as Peter Woodthorpe and John Thaw's interplay was a delight of the first three seasons of Morse. One question - If this is going to be the only Endeavor episode shouldn't the page be moved to take ""series"" out of its title?
As much as PBS is a a part of my life I tired, several years ago, of how they mess with the British programs. So I bought myself a region free DVD player and have been ordering the series from Amazon UK. Amazingly the product is often cheaper - even with the shipping costs - than buying the DVDs from Amazon US and I get to see the programs before they air on PBS or BBC America - or as I know call it the Top Gear/Gordan Ramsey channel. Sherlock has been brilliant and I love the jokes about Mycroft's weight. Speaking of Mark Gatiss who would have thought that one of The League of Gentleman zanies would be doing so many interesting things today. That also means that I should mention his one time colleague Steve Pemberton's WhiteChapel series. While not necessarily up there with some of our favorites it has had some interesting moments. Enjoy the rest of your weekend! | Talk
"
|
toxic
|
en
|
"
User subpage for major revisions?
I keep trying to make a huge revision to an article, but my comp keeps crashing and I lose all my sources open in other windows. I created a subpage to save it until it's ready to publish, but Wikipedia:Subpage#Disallowed_uses says that's not allowed? I thought I read somewhere else that they recommend that, and I know you did it so...I'm confused. Is it ok for me to use a subpage for a major revision? (talk | contribs) "
|
toxic
|
en
|
It comes up in the first paragraph of the lead and the body. However, if you want to write more in the body then that would be awesome.
|
toxic
|
en
|
"
Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions.
Currently, you are editing without a username. You can continue to do so, as you are not required to log in to Wikipedia to read and edit articles; however, logging in will result in a username being shown instead of your IP address (yours is 207.180.130.80). Logging in does not require any personal details, and there are many other benefits for logging in.
When you edit pages:
Please respect others' copyrights; do not copy and paste the contents from webpages directly.
Please use a neutral point of view when editing articles; this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add unreasonable contents into any articles, such as copyrighted text, advertisement messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Adding such content or editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism.
The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. For now, if you are stuck, you can click the edit this page tab above, type {{helpme}} in the edit box, and then click Save Page; an experienced Wikipedian will be around shortly to answer any questions you may have. Also feel free to ask a question on . I will answer your questions as far as I can! Thank you again for contributing to Wikipedia. "
|
toxic
|
en
|
This proved to be premature! Please have a look into it again. Also the problem with Pourdavoud is still pending. Kind regards, .
|
toxic
|
en
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.