Text
stringlengths 28
573
|
|---|
Analysis 25. I have heard learned counsels for the parties. 26. Since the fountain head of the present contempt case is section 138 ni act complaint and the complaint has already been quashed vis-a-vis the respondent number 1, i am of the view that respondent number 1 is not a contemnor in the present petition. |
Both parties are directed to furnish whatever additional documents and filed the cbi asks for and to extend full cooperation to the cbi." 56. |
It was further stated in the moa that overdue payment would attract interest @ 15%/18% per annum. 7. |
It is argued that the respondent issued request letters to the petitioner seeking issuance of delivery orders for the payment made towards the outstanding dues, however, the petitioner did not issue any delivery order and itself flouted the terms of the undertaking. |
Versus ms sheela abhay lodha @ ors. On 18 december, 2023
Non-compliance of the undertaking dated 04.08.2014. 48. Respondent number 2 is the whole time director of ampl and is responsible for the affairs of ampl. |