set
stringclasses
3 values
argument_EN
stringlengths
35
251
topic_EN
stringlengths
21
52
quality_score_EN
float64
0
1
stance_label_EN
int64
-1
1
stance_conf_EN
float64
0.34
1
test
this law keeps communities safe from career criminals
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
1
-1
0.896841
test
this law sentences people on crimes they committed in the past as well as the present, which is unfair
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
0.868276
1
1
test
this leads to gender inequality and helps promote gender sterotypes
We should prohibit women in combat
0.53
-1
0.894081
test
this lowers business costs and provides more food
We should ban factory farming
0.703446
-1
0.882228
test
this may sound old fashioned but men should be the protectors
We should prohibit women in combat
0.24469
1
1
test
this method increases meat products to meet the high demand.
We should ban factory farming
0.787246
-1
0.796936
test
this method is unfair to many traders who do not have access to such technology
We should ban algorithmic trading
1
1
0.771305
test
this nation was founded on christian principles, and to just get rid of them now is a terrible idea.
We should adopt atheism
0.787127
-1
0.800013
test
this practice can be uncomfortable for kids not practicing any religion.
We should prohibit school prayer
1
1
1
test
this should be a criminal offense because of the horrors others had to endure.
Holocaust denial should be a criminal offence
0.39149
1
1
test
this should be legal as it is no worse than alcohol.
We should legalize cannabis
1
1
1
test
this should not be banned as it makes trading easier and simpler.
We should ban algorithmic trading
0.973249
-1
1
test
this subject should not be discussed and is a shame is not jet implemented in every country and accepted with every government in the world.
Holocaust denial should be a criminal offence
0.303394
1
0.698072
test
this system is so unfair as people who commit one big crime can end up serving less time than those who commit three small crimes.
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
1
1
0.910462
test
this takes away freedom of choice in terms of hiring a lawyer that suits your own needs.
The use of public defenders should be mandatory
0.949286
-1
0.92829
test
this trading system keeps buying and selling clean
We should ban algorithmic trading
0.67313
-1
0.671181
test
this type of agriculture is artificial and brings many chemicals dangerous to human health
We should ban factory farming
0.681503
1
1
test
this type of trading is unfair and should be banned
We should ban algorithmic trading
0.663612
1
1
test
this type of trading leaves volatile markets in the hands of a computer program which if infiltrated or erroneous could destroy world economies.
We should ban algorithmic trading
0.946041
1
1
test
this type of trading makes larger than possible trades and uses unnatural ways to make them. it is trying to get around the system and is unfair.
We should ban algorithmic trading
0.895269
1
0.809097
test
this was a very serious mass killing based on hate, was not that long ago, and could be repeated. hate crimes should be a felony, and this is one of the biggest, if not the biggest hate crime in history.
Holocaust denial should be a criminal offence
0.900003
1
1
test
this we keep rich people from getting away with crimes because they will not be able to get high priced lawyers.
The use of public defenders should be mandatory
0.726862
1
1
test
this will level the playing field between those who can afford top-notch attorneys and those who can't.
The use of public defenders should be mandatory
0.694826
1
0.704808
test
this work is not overseen so subject to misuse and abuse.
We should ban missionary work
0.746644
1
0.906617
test
this would cause a decrease in pay for the public defender and lower the quality of representation as too many people will rush to the new employment opportunities regardless of their record..
The use of public defenders should be mandatory
0.695766
-1
0.806152
test
this would create equality and true justice. if everyone had a public defender, justice would be more fair instead of the more well off skirting justice because they can pay more money to expensive lawyers.
The use of public defenders should be mandatory
1
1
1
test
this would create many general attorneys representing cases they are not skilled nor knowledge about and would flood the attorney pool overwhelmingly and cause a wait list for representation..
The use of public defenders should be mandatory
0.645032
-1
1
test
this would eliminate peoples right to choose.
The use of public defenders should be mandatory
0.832209
-1
1
test
this would ensure everyone, regardless of financial means, has the same level of representation, making it a fairer system.
The use of public defenders should be mandatory
0.616265
1
0.898546
test
this would insure that people have a legal representation regardless of the ability to hire a lawyer.
The use of public defenders should be mandatory
1
1
1
test
this would level the playing field for all, meaning the poor would have access to the same lawyers the rich use.
The use of public defenders should be mandatory
1
1
0.897549
test
this would not be a good use of public money; money should instead be spent on education and welfare.
The use of public defenders should be mandatory
0.761135
-1
1
test
this would start a slippery slope, making thought crimes a reality.
Holocaust denial should be a criminal offence
1
-1
0.886822
test
this would stop rich people being able to avoid criminal charges by buying the best lawyers.
The use of public defenders should be mandatory
0.941968
1
0.905099
test
those in need don't need bombarded with religious influence just to obtain the other help missionaries do.
We should ban missionary work
0.71509
1
0.784231
test
those providing missionary work in war torn countries are putting undue burden on our government to protect them
We should ban missionary work
1
1
1
test
those that deny that the holocaust happened a mad and making denial a criminal offence would be improper.
Holocaust denial should be a criminal offence
0.282862
-1
0.520393
test
those that heavily use social media lose the emotinal connection that comes from face to face relationships
Social media brings more harm than good
0.569586
1
1
test
those who are not familiar with technology would be at a disadvantage
We should ban algorithmic trading
0.812739
1
1
test
those who deny that the holocaust occurred are only ignorant not criminals
Holocaust denial should be a criminal offence
0.834914
-1
1
test
those who deny the holocaust are clearly evil and should be punished.
Holocaust denial should be a criminal offence
0.849479
1
1
test
those who deny the holocaust can offend those who have family that lived through it. it can also cause fights between those who are in denial and those who believe.
Holocaust denial should be a criminal offence
0.704924
1
0.887769
test
those who forget the past are doomed to repeat it. denying the holocaust increases the odds of it happening again
Holocaust denial should be a criminal offence
0.879239
1
0.903122
test
those who have committed minor offenses will be forced to spend life in prison.
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
0.744964
1
0.79579
test
though it can be frowned upon, everyone has a right to their own opinion.
Holocaust denial should be a criminal offence
1
-1
0.919357
test
thought crimes should not be punishable
Holocaust denial should be a criminal offence
0.786746
-1
0.95475
test
thought crimes should not be punishable.
Holocaust denial should be a criminal offence
0.706863
-1
1
test
Thousands of lives are ruined by life sentences for crimes as minor as shoplifting.
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
0.782139
1
0.906331
test
three is an arbitrary number and may not be appropriate in some instances or for some crimes
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
0.679298
1
0.808567
test
three minor offence should be punished accordingly
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
0.495044
1
0.444478
test
three small crimes shouldn't put some away for a long time
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
0.738504
1
0.899677
test
three strike law are dated criminals facing life sentences would have nothing to lose and therefore could be more violent
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
1
1
0.796043
test
three strike law is a deterrent for criminals as their sentence will be harsher
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
0.867762
-1
1
test
three strike law is just another loophole in the rule of law that allows criminals to roam free without been purnished for there sins
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
0.653964
1
0.794824
test
three strike laws can cause wrongful life sentences
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
0.875402
1
1
test
three strike laws can cause young people to be put away for life without a chance to straight out their life
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
0.904965
1
1
test
three strike laws can help lower crime rates
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
0.807653
-1
1
test
three strike laws can help lower crimes because they know they will get more jail time for repeated offenses
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
0.916248
-1
1
test
three strike laws can put young people away for life for 3 small crimes
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
1
1
1
test
Three strike laws count insignificant crimes like drug use, and result in unfair jail time sentences.
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
0.810767
1
1
test
three strike laws do not take into account the passage of time and lessons learned from previous and possibly unrelated offenses. automatic three strikes are unfair
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
1
1
1
test
three strike laws don't take into account individual cases and restrict a judge to sanctioned sentencing.
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
1
1
1
test
three strike laws get repeat offenders off the streets, making them safer for the citizens.
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
0.701578
-1
1
test
Three strike laws keep people who've killed a lot off the street.
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
0.490038
-1
0.740084
test
three strike laws perpetuate the for profit prison industrial complex and donג€™t actually address the underlying issues driving people to commit crimes
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
0.986285
1
1
test
three strike laws provide standardized sentencing for repeat criminals and help move cases through an overcrowded court system.
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
1
-1
1
test
three strike laws serve in the public interest
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
0.855494
-1
1
test
Three strike laws take habitual offenders off the street, reducing overall crime.
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
0.772593
-1
1
test
three strike laws wonג€™t stop repeat offenders from committing crimes
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
0.851495
1
0.892384
test
three strikes allows someone to make a genuine mistake and not be punished as harshly right away.
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
0.574906
-1
0.892801
test
three strikes implies that all crimes are equally harmful and doesn't allow for flexibility in sentencing. one size does not fit all.
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
0.978072
1
1
test
three strikes is enough opportunity for a person to reform their behavior and become a law abiding citizen. after three strikes a person has proven they are not interested in conforming to societal rules.
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
1
-1
1
test
three strikes is too many and dangerous criminals will be on the loose again too quickly.
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
0.542283
1
0.587166
test
three strikes is too many in some cases. if people know they have three chances, they will not be deterred from using that to their advantage.
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
0.77423
1
0.896827
test
three strikes is too many, two strikes is quite enough
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
0.526603
1
0.778886
test
three strikes law helps reduce over crowding on prisons
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
0.404634
-1
0.899084
test
three strikes law would deliver a clear message to the offender. so he thinks twice before committing a crime.
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
1
-1
1
test
Three strikes laws abolish political will the creation and funding of rehabilitation programs by pushing everyone into the jail system immediately.
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
0.390036
1
0.826416
test
Three strikes laws are a deterrent for repeat offenders because they don't want to spend their life in prison.
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
0.938335
-1
1
test
three strikes laws are a powerful crime deterrent. people think twice before committing a crime if they know the results lead you to spend your life in prison.
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
1
-1
1
test
Three strikes laws are difficult to understand or conceptualize, so they are ineffective at preventing crime.
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
0.588903
1
1
test
Three strikes laws are expensive because they increase how long people are incarcerated which must be paid for by tax payers.
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
0.903555
1
1
test
three strikes laws are fair and just because there is no room for interpretation. a person knows the third offense and they are going to be hit harder.
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
0.878132
-1
1
test
Three strikes laws are perfectly constitutional since the punishment isn't unusual and they are proportional to frequency of crime if not intensity of criminal action.
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
0.715476
-1
1
test
Three strikes laws are unconstitutional because they impose punishments that are disproportional to the crime.
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
1
1
1
test
Three strikes laws are unnecessary because states already have ways of punishing recidivism more harshly.
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
0.860687
1
0.954146
test
Three strikes laws decrease intra-community reporting of crime since victims are more likely to be silenced by the perpetrator or take pity on them if it is someone close to them due to the increased punishment.
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
0.902312
1
0.90793
test
Three strikes laws destroy families by taking away parents and children for the rest of their lives with no chance of parole.
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
1
1
1
test
Three strikes laws destroy the ability of detectives to trace large crime organizations by preventing the use of plea deals to leverage information from lower level gang violence.
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
0.896673
1
1
test
three strikes laws discourage criminals from committing again
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
0.793928
-1
0.898422
test
Three strikes laws disincentive police officers from committing frivolous arrests since those they arrest on the third time will burden the system for much longer.
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
0.439085
1
0.65281
test
Three strikes laws don't distinguish between violent and non-violent felonies and often end up putting individuals away for a long time who don't pose a threat to society.
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
1
1
1
test
Three strikes laws encourage a more domineering and less empathetic approach to criminal justice, which has been shown to not be functional in decreasing crime or repeat offenders.
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
1
1
1
test
Three strikes laws encourage rehab spending to keep people from getting caught up in the third strike.
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
0.762041
-1
0.906858
test
three strikes laws enforce the stance that recidivism will not be tolerated, people will be held accountable for their actions.
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
1
-1
0.899581
test
three strikes laws gives people more chances to straight their act
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
0.593495
-1
0.900352
test
Three strikes laws have not decreased the number of crimes being committed, so they have no purpose.
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
0.941528
1
1
test
Three strikes laws increase court fees and court clog because individuals facing a third conviction will deploy everything possible in court to try and avoid the third strike.
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
0.903722
1
1
test
Three strikes laws increase recidivism because people in jail for long periods must join a gang to survive and have a good quality of life.
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
0.344827
1
0.928198
test
Three strikes laws increase sentences, allowing prosecutors and police to get confessions and testimony from low level offenders.
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
0.472661
-1
0.794325