id
stringlengths
16
16
comment_text
stringlengths
6
5k
label
class label
2 classes
b911dbf38e7edbe8
I think that's what I meant, sorry. (𒁳)
0non
803450fc46736504
I feel your pain! There are so many articles that I want to work on just because it would be fun to learn about them while doing the research for them, then there are articles that need to be finished because they are terrible. Oh, home computer is kaputz, so I might not be on much since I'll be using work computer only, will continue to do my best though.
0non
4eb02da96c1a4640
What a bunch of wanker's
1tox
14abd52d7f2642d1
sandbox Should I revert my new edit to that page?
0non
2be295144835e2e3
" Attendances Where do you get the attendances from? "
0non
c7f8714b24db1fc5
As I mentioned, I've made a request for mediation of this and prior issues relating to the Gary Weiss article, and look forward to a constructive and very open discussion. As it happens, I have gathered additional information bearing on these topics which I'm eager to present in the course of making my case. By the time we're done, I'm quite certain there will be no question in anybody's mind as to the facts, and I suspect the record will be edited to reflect as much. If it should turn out that we're wrong, I'll be the first to beg your pardon. Either way, I hope we can be friends.
0non
868a914a3eaac1b2
Max von Sydow Nominated for Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close (film) and he is currently 82, making him the oldest ever academy award nominee.
0non
3dfd2554743c1401
" proposing to remove the ""Poorly sourced"" title as the content in the article is well source & defined. Inviting your opinions for the same ( )"
0non
038fa68c579f7b8a
the German version I find a quite detailed article on this topic in the German wikipedia: de:Ugly-Duckling-Theorem, but I don't understand German. So it would be great if someone could translate that one into English.
0non
de58ea7591a4b544
" Unfair block I hope whoever blocked me is watching my talk page. It was unfair. I was blocked for a ""personal attack"" which was simply stating my POV on a users talk page. I didn't cuss, swear, curse, use profanity, or do the above under any differen't name. I simply said ""From what I can see of your user page you hardly qualify as a devout Catholic."" I would like there for to be unblocked immediately, and as an aside I've had worse things said to me - Including Calton's ""Elton John is coming to destroy your marraige"" above. This is unacceptable. "
0non
c7aee120a20a96b6
Citing sources Check out the Wikipedia:Citing sources page for help with this. 58.8.18.35
0non
87d57ac300cafb44
Democrat? You have to look half way down the page to find out wether he is a democrat or republican. This is one of the most important factors about him and is what many people come to this page to find out. There needs to be a mention of it within the first few lines.
0non
f1638d66f20c97bf
How are you gentleman? Happy Easter, love Johnny! Don't deny yourself or me anymore!
0non
8c2976127148e438
...rush toward the communist future; construct the fatherland, defend the fatherland, bravely struggle on. Forward! Forward! Forward! Let us for all eternity raise aloft the banner of Mao Zedong, forward! Raise aloft the banner of Mao Zedong, forward! Forward! Forward! Forward!
0non
35b62cbebde76e87
" Please! I see your point of view. But you don't watch the channel! So how do you know? Look, I really don't want to argue here, I'm just an admin like you are, there is no possible way I can provide proof for this; what would you like me to do as proof? There's NOTHING! Just take my word, Anna left - I watched the show! Everyone knows she's left! Here's a tip for ya; go look at the website: www.tgbbq.com - look at PRESENTERS. Ronan IS there, Anna ISN'T. Is THAT proof?? C'mon, let's make this the end of it. You've admitted you know nothing about the channel. So how can you know more than I do? We're equal, so I could argue you have no proof. But I don't want to do that. If you change it again, and I think ""well, he's obviously ademant"" and leave it, then people viewing this page are going to get the wrong idea. He STILL works there. How about you watch the channel; then you'll see I'm right. PLEASE, let's not get unfriendly about this."
0non
63b0610138d4368a
" ""Down syndrome"" vs. ""Down's syndrome"" Hi! Please stop changing the title of ""Down syndrome"" to ""Down's syndrome"". The non-possessive form is the current convention in medical writing, recently discussed here. If you disagree with this, please post your arguments on the talk page. /... "
0non
067c5e814e88a56b
FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU
1tox
6ed9740160a25583
You are correct, the page hadn't been updated for nearly two years. Thanks for the heads-up, everything should now be correct. - (talk)
0non
10e4d997cb64dc3d
America is not United States, please you don't call thoom. America no es Estados Unidos ¡¡¡Entiendanlo!!!
0non
ed7c26d26c6493ed
Created and copyright (2003) by Eugene Villar (seav).) And released under terms of the GNU FDL, right? ;)
0non
55bc5c47579a71dc
Opose: all other switches are either pretty evident and don't deserve article, or just less common. Surely, most people come here for this switch. The article contains a hatnote with the link to DAB, so everyone can find the right target anyway. —
0non
96003c957d7467fc
Now you are censoring Farawayman, also? Old boy or mafia?
0non
05437d98fba6a0e9
appearance of Mizrahi Jews
0non
b8ec104b79173a16
scripture about peter the apostles house Now while Peter doubted in himself what this vision which he had seen should mean, behold, the men which were sent from Cornelius had made enquiry for Simon's house, and stood before the gate A Boyle
0non
524ac5980123f7f5
You're Just Going To Remove My Comment i'd add something, but there's no point, is there.
0non
5ce07f4d40e3b8ec
Why do you ask me, there is a conclusion in the source, in it is not nothing
0non
f96d838947184941
'' as the absolute result of a delusion, despite their sources not supporting that opinion
0non
35919f3b52d261ab
Favor Hi Ruhr. At last, Columbia Slough is ready for vetting, and I've listed it at PR. Any advice you'd care to give would be much appreciated.
0non
988ae7bb137c6825
Thanks for adding the Olson 1967 reference. I agree - the article is in a sorry state. It's stuck in the 1960s. But that reference is very helpful in illustrating, as the article points out, how the concept of hi-fi has changed, and continues to change, with time. Will fix this up. Thanks.
0non
55157ef66c07a04e
" This person is at least somewhat notable. Note that he had a red link from Leonia, New Jersey for over a year, before he wrote his own article. So someone else thought he was notable too. I've redone this article a bit, so taken off that ""auto"" tag. "
0non
969f90237a1ae4dd
Greetings Miss Riana Hey Riana, I hope everything is good with you and that you're enjoying the weekend. I would like to introduce you to a friend of mine, and myself, so he doesn't need any NN stye supervision or major help or anything. He's doing well with editing and already has a DYK for an article he created (Judy Morris) and so I believe he's definitely here for the right reasons and not for socialising, but he's, understandably, keen to link in with some of the editors in his general age group (I'm not sure of his exact age but I take it he's around 16/17). I hope you don't mind but I have recommended you as an excellent Australian administrator. So if he ever drops by your talk page to say G'day or to ask for a hand with something, that's what it's about. Hope that's okay with you. Take care mate, Sarah
0non
d01127de6693c2f7
":::Well i see you think that u are infact better then me, well heres the deal, ..... you know what, screw it, ill leave u to believe what u want, ""i know more about metal then u"" oh yeah buddy well u must be so much awsome, u r so cool i wish u were my friend! because u know everything about everything dont u, well congrats, hows this sound, tell all ur ""friends"" that ur not doing there homework and see who is ur m8 then. and whats this ""i dont give a flying fuck"" what are u a retard, heres the deal, u cant fly and u for sure dont get fucked, so go root ur pet frog u fucking homo cunt! "
1tox
dee1a05e12d91a49
Incidentally, an expanded account of the Jeremiah Wright controversy is more suited to Jeremiah Wright and Barack Obama presidential campaign, 2008. The campaign section in this article only needs to be a brief summary, or it will conflict with the ideals of WP:RECENT. Hasn't this already been agreed upon many times?
0non
e91a9a0c486643d3
I disagree, I feel events like this are one of many important steps in a child's development. 99.241.223.101
0non
4da3a977102ccb5b
" What a waffle. Yep. Its ""neither begets nor was begotten"" - which states that no organic or inorganic object can be born or originate from him (Jesus, you, your cat, the images of him at the Sistine Chapel) because he is perfect and transcends representation or divisibility (the trinity is described as three parts of the same being) and that nothing was the cause of him (absolute, alone, one, unique). I'll go and change it now. Sorry about wasting your time while I worked out the ""not nor"" issue which actually was probably just a missing comma in the correct transliteration. "
0non
600cd2beeefa69fd
"WikiThanks.png]] Hi Dan, thank you for voting in support of my RFA; the result was (28-0-0 ). I hope that I am able to fulfil the expectations of an admin. If you see me mess up anywhere, have any concerns, please don't hesitate to tell me! Take care. (Talk) PS: Hope Wikinews is going well. RC patrolling response What I've been doing the past few days actually is monitoring the new articles page. I only found out about the RC IRC dump tonight, so yes, that's what I've been doing. -) Then again, how'd you notice? Great job I award this Barnstar to Dan100 for your great job doing just about all patrolling in #wikipedia-en-vandalism for a while. Doing a great job with no one else patrolling most of the time. Doing a lot at time and beating me to reverting vandalism as well during this time as well Talk [/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Adam1213&action;=edit&section;=new +] {{test}} Hi, this IP (194.154.22.51) is registered to Tiffin Boys' School and I got the message despite not having vandalised, but I'll ""have a word"" with the people in the IT rooms who may have done it. Sorry, but pls don't block, as it's used by at least 20ppl. Thanks, JS 209.175.175.11 Could you block them, please? More vandalism to Sarcou...I don't know how to spell it:-) I emailed the abuse email address. (talk|email) No problem. (talk|email) Thanks Thank you watching my back (reverts on my user and talk pages). Britt Hackemack Hi, I use the IRC RC dump for vandalism monitoring"
0non
620ea394b2fec9cf
dead jews == can someone please just say how many jews died? that's all anyone is interested in this article for anyway ==
0non
5dcedacc576dfc38
" Thank you! Same to you! 1234 "
0non
e083fb37f356329b
, and it is starting to seem less than likely that we can make the both of you feel satisfied with the result
0non
a3a57f5bc137d696
Unprotected Ok, I've unprotected the article. From that RFC, it appears that Keetoowah is the problem more than anything, and last night I blocked him per 2 months as prescribed via the interpretation of the arbcom's ruling on him in October.
0non
99d5e686e550dfb3
"I believe the original source is the 1988 PBS documentary ""Plagues"", which was hosted by Blumberg according to http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/9433/title/Baruch-BlumbergScience-on-TV/ You'll notice this source says, ""may have contributed to as many as half"", which is weaker than the form usually stated as fact these days. Is this claim really plausible? "
0non
133a30f47b23a082
. THOSE GAMES WERE THERE TO PROVE HIS WEAKNESSES. ATLEAST ONE OF THEM FOR EACH WEAKNESS SHOULD BE THERE. ONCE IT GOT DELETED BY YOU, I PUT UP 13. And I did not put up the jason kidd game btw. THAT's WHY I WAS SAYING DON'T MESS WITH IT
0non
f035c2b01034382d
" Imperial propaganda in progress Hi there. I need neutral users' help to react on intolerable ""Russification"" of history here and, most important here. Imperial Pride Watch ), presented by our common ... friend, is refusing to edit the POV-table, making me delete it instead. What do you say? "
0non
2faa97ce9c0aa2b5
Include film content TAB Interviews includehttp://www.pbs.org/independentlens/dirt-the-movie/more.htmlhttp://www.kpbs.org/news/2010/apr/16/independent-lens-dirt-movie/http://www.cityfarmer.info/2010/01/01/dirt-the-movie-the-importance-of-soil/http://www.moviereleses.com/watch-online-dirt-the-movie-movie-7865.html: Vandana Shiva, Fritjof Capra, John Todd (biologist), Gary Vaynerchuk of Wine Library TV, Wangari Maathai, Janine Benyus, Miguel Altieri, Jeremy Narby, Paul Stamets, Andy Lipkis, Pierre Rabhi, David W. Orr, Jeannette Armstrong, Sebastião Salgado, Majora Carter, Alice Waters, Wes Jackson, Richard Register, and more. 99.181.159.212
0non
d27a91d455f281b0
I live in white owl landing on phillips landing road. my county councilman tim dukes told me that I must write my concerns to you because you all control anything concerning the robert graham wildlife area on phillips landing road.well, here goes- any time we leave our development, the first thing we see is the awful mess across the road. there are fallen trees, twigs, branches, etc., all along that area and we all get absolutely disgusted every time we leave our homes. what is the point in living in a nice development like ours if we half to see that mess every time we leave????? isn't there anything at all that can be done about cleaning that junk up and make it more pleasant to look at. in Maryland they are letting people cut the fallen logs for firewood. can't we do that too?? please respond to my concerns at njkelley105@aol.com thank you for your attention njk
0non
68ddaeeec2847f34
"Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Username Hello and, per the above, welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, the username you have chosen does not conform to the username guidelines. Please choose another. If you have any questions, my talk page is always open.brenneman "
0non
29c529d706c275ba
" Why don't you go fuck yourself, you dipshit? You started with the insults, I'm just not taking crap from a stupid fanboy like you. If you actually looked at my edit history, you'd see that I do contribute articles, and unlike waste-of-space Levy, I also do regular maintenance work here like cleaning up categories and other things admins are supposed to do. Keep replying, I'm not wasting any effort ""improving"" this piece of crap article, but I'll be glad to call you names and point out how stupid you are, all day long. "
1tox
ddd2c33265e046c6
Toto's Pizza House Could you please help me. I created the page Toto's Pizza House and then moved it to User:Pestbuda\Toto's Pizza House, and on realising I used the wrong slash moved it to User:Pestbuda/Toto's Pizza House. I've tried to move it to Toto's Pizza House and have been told I cannot. Could you please help me move it to just Toto's Pizza House. There are a lot of things I need to put on it but if it can be put on WP proper I think it will be OK. I've also put links, which was a silly thing for me to do before creating the article. If you could help me I'd be very appreciative, or if you cannot suggest another administrator familiar with this problem, which must have occurred before. Thank you.
0non
083b467125241d1d
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the Refracting telescope page on Wikipedia! Your test worked, and thank you for reverting or removing it yourself. The best way to do tests in the future would be to use the sandbox. You can look at these pages as well: how to edit a page, the tutorial, and how to write a great article. All of these pages are good places to start. Again, thanks, and we hope that you will like Wikipedia. |™
0non
6ccb9fdf8384fd7e
Even worse is the fact that the original includes a link to a compilation study by Stanton A. Glantz, PhD that says vapers continue to smoke combustible cigarettes. The study referenced another study that only looked at a 30 day period. This man is a rabid anti ecigarette advocate that has been found to twist statistics to his own anti-ecigarette bias. All the study did was rephrase others work in a way to make it look like the opposite that was found. The proposed section looks more balanced.
0non
f402bf4594a20a5a
UPDATE - Have further edited repeat reference to his name with pronouns. hope it is OK now.
0non
b84d0dfed8d7f194
And by the way, Fatty, edit summaries are fine on talk pages, but hardly necessary. Edit summaries explain why I do what I do. That's not necessary on a talk page, the other editor simply has to read my comments. Ok, shortbusser, I'll get along now. 68.218.222.40
0non
6030e88354c8be98
" (UTC) Airbag Fatalities I removed this: ""In Europe the number of people not wearing their seatbelts is very small when compared to the US, and Europeans are less likely to be obese. As a direct result of these two points, European airbags are less powerful than their American counterparts and are therefore less likely to cause loss of life than those fitted to American cars."" Give me a break. If you want to reintroduce this, please provide citations for every claim made in the paragraph. Agreed. I've heard the exact opposite regarding airbag deployment strength, in factthat American-market cars have less forceful airbags because the occupants are more likely not to be wearing their seat belt, whereas in Europe the airbags can deploy faster (more forcefully) because it's assume you're wearing a seatbelt. KeplerNiko With exception to the ""Europeans being less obese"" bit, I'd probably agree with that first statement - sounds about right to me. Dates of Deployment I take strong issue with the discussion of the dates of airbags first being used in vehicles, especially since it seems to me that it violates Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. It seems to me that this article is American-car biased, a country whose automobile manufacturers are most assuredly not first when I think of those who were first-adopters of new safety technology. Particularly, the line about Chrysler making airbags ""standard equipment across its entire line in 1990"" makes it sound like Chrysler was the first manufacturer to standardize airbag installation. The next paragraph indicates, however, that US cars produced after 1 April 1989 must have either airbags or automatic seat belts (latter is news to me)it seems to me that the vast majority of manufacturers opted to install airbags over seat belt systems. However, the way the article is written, it seems like Chrysler's actions were unique and, most of all, done out of its own initiative, rather than being federally mandated. Quite simply, Chrysler was neither the only company to take this step, nor did it have a choice in the matter. I think the line implying Chrysler did something innovative should be stricken. KeplerNiko 1970's Implication The US experiment in the early 1970's ended pretty quickly as I recall. Does the article mean to imply that this was ongoing? Maine.gov Link Regarding link Maine.gov How do air bags work: Link has gone bad. Found replacement link at but there is little useful information there. As the link adds nothing to the article, I removed the link entirely. ...airbags only reduce fatalities in those wearing seatbelts by 8% Following up on an old point by Tekfiler, the government does not want you to know this number, since that would be clear indication of a collossal waste in terms of cost benefit analysis. So - the stat is never called out. The [[NHTSA}} page has some interesting data on how U.S. highway deaths have been declining at a slower rate than in other industrialised nations. If airbags were really all they are cracked up to be, seems that would not be true. It is also advised that you dont sit too close to the steering wheel because when the airbag inflates it will crush you back in your seat, stopping you from inhaling cause your crest can't go out, therefore stopping you from breathing. Inventor altered?? On 22:19, 7 October 2007 User:Happyyarn changed inventor: John W. Hetrick -> Patrick W. Hetrick Is this correct?? (the only change this user made..) Deleted Link I deleted the external link that was said to show a clip of an airbag exploding. This link was spam. Regarding age The article said children under 12 should always be in the back seat. I changed it to 13 because a 12 year old could get killed by an airbag. 21:48, 9 November 2007"
0non
52c24b085b05f139
Massacre at Jenin Nothing discredited about the smell of the massacre at jenin, you just don't want people to know about it.
0non
3f350439b2f071d5
" ""where the Dallas City Code does not permit merchandise to be sold within areas under the control of the its [sic] Park and Recreation Department""? Maybe it should be, ""...as the Dallas City Code does not permit merchandise to be sold in that area, which is under the control of its Park and Recreation Department"". "
0non
6c3afa63c6e54398
" I'll apologize to terry, but bear in mind that he was no better with his ""Shut up"" quips. "
0non
90324ce6598bd7cc
HI i'm sorry for my vandalism reports please dont block me from editing i promise not to do it again
0non
f05f429842614873
" The third one is written by him. And I quote: ""I ended up with Chicago on the practice squad in November and sent to NFL Europe in February 2004. I played for the Berlin Thunder, which is the team that won this year’s World Bowl."" Pretty conclusive, I'd say. "
0non
f8b9583ee2a8bef0
, having an acc no fun
0non
cd97cd9862469ba0
Xtools Xtools gives an Internal error. Another problem with Xtools is that, too often, its server is too slow, not just when navigating but even just to show visitors its main page. It seems (tools.)wmflabs.org could use an upgrade. Related: maybe you could discuss with
0non
6927ab3ac5d6646d
I agree. This is a complete and total joke. While I can understand possibly having bios on characters, to have such a discussion on the company is farcical. No wonder Wikipedia is laughed at so often.~~~~
0non
21bc5195994dfc06
" Redirection from ""Machine Translations"" means no link to the musical act of that name As subject says, when I enter ""machine translations"" in to Wiki search, it redirects directly to this page. Yet there is a wikipedia page called ""Machine Translations"" discussing to the musical act of that name. To get to that page I have to search for (""J. Walker"" ""machine translations"") in its entirety. Could some competent wiki editor fix this situation please?"
0non
aff79a24279ed1b9
Hey Samir, thanks for unblocking me, sorry to use that expression regarding you. Thanks for your understanding. ( )
0non
560e3502e411cc2b
" Oh, if any of this is ""over the line""... after what I've been put through I really don't care. If the lot of you don't want to talk to pissed off people, you might try NOT BEING RUDE AND PISSING THEM OFF. 76.31.236.91 "
0non
fb9c96eae38ca596
There's an explanation at Science blogs but no explanation as to why it is still down right now, 9 January 2009.
0non
6b8f86abdc7712dc
my apologies suck my junk bitch!!!
1tox
4225f0a8212ad52d
Oh dear, Mr. Tomlin. I have to admit, I was secretly hoping you were going to tell me that a summary like the one in Styles would be sufficient, since it is a significantly less daunting task than a full synopsis. Alas, you are of the plot synopsis school of thought vis-à-vis plot summaries. In all honesty, then, I must further admit that while I don’t like writing synopses, I do like reading them! So, I guess I’m in the plot synopsis camp as well. ) Hmm … now what? It galls me that the plot summary in The Big Four is unfinished and — if I understand the template — has been for a bit of a while. But I don’t want us writing the equivalent of Coles Notes either. Hmm … maybe between the two of us, we can take a stab at it. I have another article that I have left by the wayside that I should get back to, but since I think virtually no one else on Wikipedia even knows it exists, I can leave it a bit longer. I guess the only way to tackle this would be chapter by chapter. Do you think that chapter sub-headings would be too much? Also, any other tips for writing synopses? My problem is that I am an infinitely better “editor” than a “writer”. I look forward to hearing from you. Please respond here as I have your talk page watched. Ciao for now! —
0non
b0fd2e8134c8ee6a
Again, the evidence that the acticles are under copyright exists where?
0non
0c5fd74f35cd0e7e
" Everlast Sarek, if you actually read some of the things ""Stan"" wrote and read his talk page, I think you would see who is warring with who. Did you notice that someone else a while back warned him about vandalizing Everlast's site? Did you notice he called that guy a Scumbag? I shouldn't be blocked for calling an idiot an idiot."
1tox
7c3c9befa4998f04
Schools There is no chance in hell residents of Deal are sedning their children to school in Asbury Park. Can we get the names of some private [probably Jewish] schools students attend after 8th grade?
0non
bdeab9c020b75a0b
Diesel engine The Mk 7 has a diesel engine, the earlier versions had the petrol engine. Part of the Mk 7 upgrade was in fact the replacement of the petrol engine with a diesel unit. This article mixes specifications of different Marks.
0non
9fa7ccd9347c5e8b
:Ethan binder The article Ethan binder has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles and if you can provide more material for the article please re-create it. Also articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
0non
a8b14ec0632e7df9
I actually have aspergers as well but ive learned not to be a pedantic little shit about it
1tox
db63dc34fd2f8b71
OK, call it advertisement if you feel more confortable. (Esp. when one comes from a communist background) the difference between advertisement and propaganda is that the former offers more mundane rewards than the latter. In propaganda at last the transmitter might believe the message... which is what I believe you are doing.
0non
8d88d046dd39c8d7
No problem. It was kinda fun once I got the hang of it. It wouldn't be too much trouble to chop the top off. However much the image was shortened by, I'd just deduct that from the y-axis coordinates. I was going to do that, but then I thought that someone without much knowledge of Ontario wouldn't realise some was chopped off, or if they did, why. At least this way it shows that there are no universities there.  (talk • contribs • email)
0non
6509834d60dcafd9
Cork would pass WP:POLITICIAN, yes.
0non
6b77881c0c9b53fa
I assume you are not Jewish. Your comment is offensive and considered lashon hora. Look it up. YOU SINEBOT ARE OFFENSIVE AND YOUR EMOTIONALLY CHARGED COMMENTS HAVE BEEN PRINTED AND SAVED. IT IS SUGGGESTED THAT YOU CHECK THE LAWS ON SLANDER AND LIBEL AND THE ARTICLE REFERRED TO ABOVE. NO EDITOR ON WIKIPEDIA IS IMMUNE FROM SUIT. YOUR BEHAVIOUR IS VINDICTIVE. INTERNET LAW IS EMERGING TRUTH AND ETHICS HOWEVER DO PREVAIL. AND IT IS ALSO NOTED THAT IT IS DISCRIMINATORY TO BLOCK SOMEONE FROM USING THIS SITE SINCE IT IS CONTRARY TO POLICY TO BLOCK ADDITION OF INFORMATION
1tox
4885729e374586db
I did not say the English and French were the same, but neither are the Scottish and Irish the same. They are just two sides of the same coin, if you willrivals who have more in common than they don't. London and Paris are the core of Western Europe in the present day, whose Entente have made an enormous impression upon the modern world. This is based on a rich tradition, originally in prehistoric material culture and surviving through all the changes in timeaugmented by the Volkerwanderung (in which the Teutonic English and French had more in common with eachother than Celtic Welsh and Bretons) 1066's Conquest and the 100 Years' War. I have no aristocratic fantasy; that is for the Whigs and their foreign collaborators who took the power away from an organic kingdom (where monarch and subject had a symbiosis) for their own benefit. You think that the idea of Brittany being part of the British Isles is modern? What is wrong with your mind?
0non
e62191e4dcce36b7
" Image copyright problem with Image:Soulton Hall.jpg Thank you for uploading Image:Soulton Hall.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If you created this image yourself, please look at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#For image creators, select one of those tags, and add it to the image. To do that, simply go to Image:Soulton Hall.jpg, click ""edit this page"", and add the appropriate tag. Be sure to remove the current tag indicating a lack of licensing! If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me at User talk:Angr or at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. —gr "
0non
4713c30cf40c35f1
just give up midnightblueowl you cannot post any critism sourced or not, about any jew or jewish organisation on wikipedia. it's a well established fact. if he was not jewish you could add the content and no one would contest it
0non
4188550155c62991
", 17 June 2012 (UTC) I would also recommend calling the Wikimedia Foundation. I can't disclose my contact's name here, because then the user will just rush off and want to lobby that person at Wikipedia, but, I have a strange feeling, if you press hard enough, our paths will cross on the same person's desk. Wikimedia Foundation Inc. 149 New Montgomery Street, 3rd Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 USA Phone: +1-415-839-6885 Fax: +1-415-882-0495 By the way. If you do a Google ""Wikipedia deletionist (User name) strikes again"", you'll find out what makes them tick. AND! You'll see that the person whose article I was working on and this user, probably know of each other. All the pieces fit. 07:26"
0non
7c720885db0c7537
" What exactly do you expect me to do? (talk) "
0non
79c1961cca0ae467
Well, four is one of the numbers...
0non
b797512fc8b44e9e
VfD of weal tag Jibran, I saw you are a fan of the less-intrusive tag weal tag]. You might be interested in participating in the VfD for this tag.
0non
9d5bc701a91cf976
"Lifestyle section in this article contained a biased link to a widely discredited (but very popular in yellow journalism, and paleo fad diet circles) meta-analysis which claims to contradict scientific consensus on saturated fat. I added the rebuttal and noted the current scientific consensus, the lipid hypothesis which contains a controversy section with the same meta-analysis and rebuttal (neither the controversial meta-analysis NOR the refutation really belong on this page OR that one, but if the meta-analysis link is going to be here the refutation needs to be as well). If you doubt the scientific consensus, the page on the Saturated fat and cardiovascular disease controversy is already well written and covers the ""controversy"" well. Any rejection of scientific and medical consensus should really be kept there, rather than spread across Wikipedia (Cholesterol skepticism, not unlike the similar anti-vaccination position, is not credible and poses a public health risk when it results in misinformation). I also clarified the point about Cholesterol, regarding hyper-responders, and included a link (if anybody has a better link or can go into more detail for readers, that might be good). People shouldn't be getting health advice from wikipedia to begin with, but this page still needs to contain responsible information. As with vaccines, listen to your doctor and you'll do fine. "
0non
996176e13cbf743a
Lua? I think Lua should be mentioned under notable homebrew, as it's definately become something of importance to homebrew, there are at least a hundred games and applications released for it. I'm not too familiar with the program or its history so anyone willing to add it?
0non
60c9651477bc2421
It looks good to me, but can you make the size smaller so that it is similar to other sizes of other userboxes. Other than that, it looks fine. Please tell me the final name of the userbox so I can put it on my page. Thanks again.
0non
a0bc264feea68bd2
I am a sexofendr people so wath out girls.
1tox
ef56761cfbbf330f
Help With stargate Sorry about adding the links. As I stated, I felt that there wasn't enough interconnectedness and I didn't know who to make a template. (And stil don't) I am going to delete the sections. If you want to help they are on all race articles, all technology articles, and all articles in the general template. Thanks and sorry
0non
25606e09097de60f
Proposed Tibetan naming conventions A while back, I posted a new proposal for Tibetan naming conventions, i.e. conventions that can be used to determine the most appropriate titles for articles related to the Tibetan region. This came out of discussions about article titles on Talk:Qamdo and Talk:Lhoka (Shannan) Prefecture. I hope that discussions on the proposal's talk page will lead to consensus in favour of making these conventions official, but so far only a few editors have left comments. If you would be interested in taking a look at the proposed naming conventions and giving your opinion, I would definitely appreciate it. Thanks—(Talk!·What have I done?)
0non
fc280da8f0895793
Retrohead as just spend 10 minutes getting a load of discography pages I have edited together and posted them on my user page,, look Ritchie I know you don't want to get involved and you are busy with your own edits and stuff but I beg you please help me to sort this stuff out I have never dealt with anyone so awkward as him before.
0non
cdc18cff270e33ae
Have a look at Traditional counties of the British Isles it contradicts all the attempt to rationalise and remove the fantasies.
0non
dec7fb6eb7a3f2cc
"in ""Electoral History"" "
0non
68857ef6e05551ba
[edit] On undue weight, this is a separate issue. This is where the situation where the fact is plainly established and in full view of daylight, but not particularly relevant to the subject's life or work. E.g. that Verne's father was a lawyer - would not command a whole paragraph, as with the pedo thing. The current problem I have is whether academic but nonetheless utterly speculative research is being presented as though it were in full view of daylight.
0non
731d2b615701fef5
so many ppl tlk on dis stoopid site i swear they must be retarded
1tox
cb77652d81a590ea
" Firstly, The concept of ""state terrorism"" as it applies to declared war is inherently fringe. The USA and the Empire of Japan were engaged in a declared war. The idea of ""war terrorism"", as outlined in the article now is a a neologism and shouldn't be included on Wikipedia. When you include information on the ""targeting of innocents to achieve a political goal"" Hiroshima and Nagasaki were military targets and were defended by an air force. What you have included, and reverted to goes on about the use of air power in unrelated conflicts as if that too were ""terrorism"". ""Terrorism"" and ""terror"" ""terrifying"" are different things. A declared war between 2 nation states is certainly terrifying, but it isn't ""terrorism"" and as such the opinions of a the few college professors who specialize in this are given undue weight here. Secondly, I am not the one who is ""edit warring"". Per the WP:BRD cycle you were bold and added material to the encyclopedia, I disagree with the materials inclusion and reverted. It was objected to. That is where you were supposed to take it to the talk page and discuss the changes, instead you reverted. That's edit warring. "
0non
5cceb6a6c8410f91
Thank you for your suggestions. I will look for these relevant citations. I do not assume a Catholic conspiracy. I do think historians are less capable than Hitler to determeine his religion. I do not want to read any books that are not short and to the point. I have begun reading some of the Wikiquotes. They appear to be better than the article itself. I will look for these relevant citations.
0non
2480a67c648f2266
YOU SUCK!! Deadly ASSASSIN IS GAY
1tox
6ffa0a21e54cac36
" Source Canvassing I've started a discussion about the phenomenon of ""Source Canvassing"" at Wikipedia_talk:Canvassing#Source_Canvassing with the idea of coming to a common consensus about the larger issue and documenting it on that page. Any input or ideas you want to contribute would be helpful, thanks. "
0non
090f9cc48fee55f9
what? Exactly what part of my message was a personal attack? Maybe you can point that out to me because I cannot see it anywhere.
0non