input
stringlengths 883
1.09k
| output
sequencelengths 1
1
| id
stringlengths 40
40
|
|---|---|---|
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Bailout of US automakers
Argument: Chapter 11 bankruptcy will help autos restructure and regroup.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-568a8a10d2a1440cb3f936b21a633c31 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Rebuilding New Orleans
Argument: Government should fund residents, not rebuilding New Orleans.
Output:
| [
"against"
] | task209-6fdc7c15f9904e05bf1bf0ddf413f147 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Needle exchanges
Argument: Drug dealers sell drugs near needle exchanges.
Output:
| [
"against"
] | task209-da439db0aba2461b9e98ce36fcd8202f |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Seattle deep-bore tunnel
Argument: Seattle tunnel less disruptive than other options.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-e557a6f9c1774a4c90a91214d225b508 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Bailout of US automakers
Argument: Low-interest loans to automakers will not solve their problems.
Output:
| [
"against"
] | task209-4cd8d21b51a54bf6b73d2f3b6658b752 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Osama Bin Laden Sea Burial
Argument: No alternative to sea burial was available.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-5df41386a91145d285e150d2aa035a63 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Rebuilding New Orleans
Argument: New Orleans can be rebuilt to address its social problems.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-2254bc960476401bb2233e6bf903bdff |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Boycott of 2008 Olympics in China
Argument: Boycott Beijing Olympics.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-e797e8be00b04edaa7b0f417172d05be |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: DREAM Act
Argument: Illegals cannot use legalized children to gain citizenship.
Output:
| [
"against"
] | task209-4d41b3ddee50452f8140d6e2ee4f5cb4 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Democratic peace theory
Argument: Spreading democracy and peace is used as a pretext for war.
Output:
| [
"against"
] | task209-451dd1604a9d423bbae0e26d8fcdae30 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: European Monetary Fund
Argument: The IMF was not designed for developed Euro countries.
Output:
| [
"against"
] | task209-92f9fd1fc30d489d956a3469e4addba8 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Bullfighting
Argument: Bulls are celebrated and honored in bullfighting.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-dbf74299543442bdabc82d1c0fcc8629 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Falkland Islands, return of
Argument: Relations with Argentina are not important to Britain.
Output:
| [
"against"
] | task209-a628f845935a460eb3fcd68f17bbc55a |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: Three Gorges Dam damages water quality.
Output:
| [
"against"
] | task209-168b9f2b3263484f9d561862521d6a57 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Banning Muslim hijab
Argument: The idea that women must wear headscarves to be dignified is offensive.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-e4f2bcc9b0b44a7d9ab34e8189edd025 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Fairness Doctrine
Argument: Balanced left/right broadcasting exist w/o Fairness Doctrine.
Output:
| [
"against"
] | task209-d723dc6c9e1e44099169b6a0b21582e6 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Castration of sex offenders
Argument: Sex predators are monsters who forgo most rights.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-68676da06c144047864b79efa05fa683 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: EU elected president
Argument: An EU president cannot hold such a complicated system to account.
Output:
| [
"against"
] | task209-e35b9d5327644baf9f5a31afb6f965b6 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Crime cameras
Argument: If a person has nothing to hide, then there is no issue.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-15d16bd5a8d64bdb8ab82739fee9891d |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Oil sands
Argument: Oil sands will be used by some states no matter what.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-d1d16bc244f5487fa5ecbd8364087137 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Big government
Argument: Big government fosters harmful entitlement culture.
Output:
| [
"against"
] | task209-a5e6bf02285e4af8b31b6239459703e7 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Hydroelectric dams
Argument: There are better ways to store water than dams.
Output:
| [
"against"
] | task209-d07909e072fd4cb1ab52a29444cd0572 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Enhanced interrogation techniques
Argument: Majority of Americans believe harsh interrogations justified.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-fc561e73c72e4bc58af6564d77051c6c |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Education vouchers
Argument: Little evidence that vouchers improve academic achievement.
Output:
| [
"against"
] | task209-d54911fefb154da29cda1524bd1eb36f |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Natural gas vehicles
Argument: Natural gas burns more cleanly than gasoline in general.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-d3aa13ea1dba449ea0267d5e009be0c5 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: High-speed rail
Argument: Unlike automobiles, rail fosters a sense of community.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-58f67b931a324abb97659a90d6440e5e |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Vegetarianism
Argument: Human and animal differences do not justify speciism/discrimination.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-23052e06496143c39e0ca3d4e84c053a |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Natural gas
Argument: Natural gas vehicles reduce emissions, fight global warming.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-9322fc82a30746508c5ff89399e5df2c |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Greece bailout
Argument: Bailout of Greece will help prevent contagion.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-db4ec5bb5892409083f4fc25f8a82231 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: No Child Left Behind Act
Argument: Statewide standards are an improvement over major local failures:.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-c4cfa12d05ec44be95668a7b0a22ff2d |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Employee Free Choice Act
Argument: Employee Free Choice Act protects unionizing workers from intimidation.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-27638d800775464fbc42253e11ca9943 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Right to bear arms in the US
Argument: A well-regulated militia can apply to a state-run as well as an independent militia.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-59f7c46cfd9c49888150edf664555c97 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Hunting for sport
Argument: Exploiting animals is more dignified than their living in the wild.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-274ebffd4db04309b7326e2fe8f2ee23 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: US electoral college
Argument: Leaders are legitimized by winning a popular majority or plurality, but the electoral college undermines this:.
Output:
| [
"against"
] | task209-7d202a793edd4262aa004a0384bfa308 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Balanced budget amendment to US Constitution
Argument: Politicians will favor corporate interests w/ balanced budget.
Output:
| [
"against"
] | task209-99f65ed1ac9b41d98a7fd09c9b84bcbf |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: College football playoffs
Argument: Playoffs would be unfair to some college football teams.
Output:
| [
"against"
] | task209-b8050805cc4648af858cc626f5f590be |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Abortion
Argument: The right to choice/privacy (abortion) does not override the right to life.
Output:
| [
"against"
] | task209-5733667210074f4ca94e8a5829774e87 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Catholic Church contraception policy
Argument: Natural methods of contraception can provide the solution to high population growth.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-d10d1886b3c448199be1cf9d1421ddf3 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Banning cell phones in cars
Argument: More difficult to enforce hands-free cell phone ban.
Output:
| [
"neutral"
] | task209-34958a199de44c6ea2723fe16918fc36 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Vehicle fuel economy standards
Argument: CAFE standards have strong history of reducing US emissions.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-8112cc733b9c4fe0bbfab7e1b1a0ebe4 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Mandatory military service
Argument: Conscripts never as good as professional soldiers.
Output:
| [
"against"
] | task209-360642bcd4624f569174e000adeea3ca |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Abolition of nuclear weapons
Argument: Nuclear weapons tests are a global hazard.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-dc91f6d6680e481785e574ebb0a918d5 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Reforestation as a solution to global warming
Argument: Enough land for reforestation to be a viable solution.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-dad00c7409b84283a1e75c8e133fec84 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Legalization of Marijuana
Argument: If marijuana is harmful, isn't this sufficient punishment for users.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-5bdb0cfebcd349daa4286c07fe41e153 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Trying 9/11 terror suspects in NYC courts
Argument: Civilian trials improve global opinion of US, fight on terrorism.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-40a1059c3ed54f7e85b29a46b0d9af9e |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Should Hugo Chávez focus on the private sector more than social spending?
Argument: Great social spendings allow people of Venezuela to use many services free.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-5796a42b64f04ff9978a3780fc575527 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Pornography
Argument: Pornography does not denigrate/harm women.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-c521f0bb27d6403590eae41a2e2cb977 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Greece bailout
Argument: Greek debt is too large for bailout to solve.
Output:
| [
"against"
] | task209-f351688172734308beb48851777c2c32 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: EU constitution reform treaty (Lisbon Treaty)
Argument: The Lisbon Treaty simply repackages the failed EU Constitution.
Output:
| [
"against"
] | task209-bfc82db6b02943659a03dc9e6161c9f3 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Earmarks
Argument: Earmarks are often unrelated to legislation; holds up bill.
Output:
| [
"against"
] | task209-b003f938e6ef44348dd58e790806fd85 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Corn ethanol
Argument: Producing corn for ethanol requires too much water.
Output:
| [
"against"
] | task209-bca1fffa37874ae19a32d8519efefee3 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Israeli settlements
Argument: Israelis have equal claim as Palestinians to settle in West Bank.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-8269a3757ba64220af66c0df9c59fdd4 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Banning vuvuzela horns at the 2010 World Cup
Argument: Vuvuzelas disrupt player's and other's sleep at night.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-14aaf72faff44f0492b9d2f6c2fc00d0 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Driftnet ban
Argument: Driftnet fishing is a form of subsistence living for many.
Output:
| [
"against"
] | task209-672c9e667215418b9b3044c426e48862 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Corporate personhood
Argument: Corps focus on profits, not eligible for rights.
Output:
| [
"against"
] | task209-cd03d7d42efd40d6bbc65911a58c26f4 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Return of Israel to pre-1967 borders
Argument: Pre-1967 borders would be too insecure and dangerous.
Output:
| [
"against"
] | task209-39765ede92274cb0840452d3545878a3 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Carbon capture and storage
Argument: CCS passes C02-leakage problem to our children.
Output:
| [
"against"
] | task209-96e4f0b270294ed0a684ccc256f81abe |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Corporate personhood
Argument: Corporations are property; should have few rights.
Output:
| [
"against"
] | task209-2ab579f0693b48bd913e207e1cf9559b |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Vegetarianism
Argument: Humans have a choice and thus responsibility to do no harm to animals.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-8c08a46db2f44ebebc71225844301d7a |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: $700 billion US economic bailout
Argument: Financial crisis requires and justifies strong executive powers.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-b6d9f46e006c45f29ded3cf50427d62b |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Tibet independence
Argument: China's militarization of Tibet is a regional risk.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-6656c421193a450184f6b5bc07a09c78 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Ban on laser pointers
Argument: Jail time is okay, but not up to 14 years in jail.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-0b38cf89af1f4f3b88f169a67530d827 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Prisoners right to vote
Argument: Rehabilitation is main goal (not punishment); voting helps.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-1bb66b5661ac416e8acd85e109bc980a |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Trying 9/11 terror suspects in NYC courts
Argument: Trying and imprisoning terrorists can create US jobs.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-8e398542aa2c4fc38b0c557f105a74cd |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: European Union Expansion
Argument: Richer EU states cannot afford to subsidize poorer states.
Output:
| [
"against"
] | task209-a8a0669b2a0940a69f8e5021829e4dad |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Waterboarding
Argument: Torture is justified in saving lives.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-e54df5d274be470bab1b6900254adc46 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: No Child Left Behind Act
Argument: No Child Left Behind effectively penalizes diversity in schools.
Output:
| [
"against"
] | task209-c29d50d736334032b88226cbe22abd65 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Balanced budget amendment to US Constitution
Argument: Balanced budget amend in states is often a bad thing.
Output:
| [
"against"
] | task209-d2b887bb1d0c4faf8e8e5191b1aee07d |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Home plate collision rule in baseball
Argument: Catcher pads are not meant for human collisions.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-2f7ce49bd90740feb7b35fa9f8f70498 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: New START Treaty
Argument: New START is not adequately verifiable.
Output:
| [
"against"
] | task209-eaa22bf04dc54b71a42acaeb6241fae8 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Needle exchanges
Argument: Needle exchanges generally degrade community cleanliness.
Output:
| [
"against"
] | task209-cf1de5df54f4414fb045a78f065d01b4 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Puerto Rico statehood in America
Argument: Puerto Rico as colony is unacceptable.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-6c77967ea53846288ed8f94f747456c9 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Deporting illegal immigrants in the US
Argument: General statements in favor of deporting illegals from the US.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-2790b667f47b46d5966ecec565786940 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: Three Gorges Dam gives China added respect in the world.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-cd65d38d712447b29554981c1b2c5211 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Kyoto Protocol
Argument: Fighting climate change means cutting emissions with Kyoto Protocol.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-5fbd6220576247f1a680d935f8f0cd36 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: New START Treaty
Argument: Russia will build-up nuclear arms without New START.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-629d70ae38ed4d529c25cf299d5fd17f |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Gay adoption
Argument: Children should not be subjects of a gay adoption experiment.
Output:
| [
"against"
] | task209-2e786b7f8c674755ac1bcf4c2d06457e |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Was the War in Iraq worth it?
Argument: Number of US troops lost in Iraq is relatively small.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-1c2e5c9a5ea04aedb5c94e759876d5ba |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Criminalization of Holocaust denial
Argument: Various claims regarding the facts of the Holocaust.
Output:
| [
"neutral"
] | task209-2f2dc1c5d0134044bca63c886050db45 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Abortion
Argument: If a fetus was defined as a person, the legal shifts would be too dramatic.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-33137a5f57834bbc95c159d10f269c1e |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Algae biofuel
Argument: Algae biofuel is commercially viable on an industrial scale.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-ea026aa1778f4b8a92c815faf300463b |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Bullfighting
Argument: Bullfighting is not that big of a tourist draw.
Output:
| [
"against"
] | task209-f9d319f5a3d94aec9d1342048125470a |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Medical marijuana dispensaries
Argument: Marijuana smoke is highly damaging to the lungs.
Output:
| [
"against"
] | task209-874e2d1f69e147a98dba57fc27053823 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Kosovo independence
Argument: Many EU foreign ministers fear violence following Kosovo independence.
Output:
| [
"against"
] | task209-ac7f0e24fe2842c39794da69ce76e361 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Bush economic stimulus plan
Argument: Tax rebates encourage irresponsible consumer spending habits.
Output:
| [
"against"
] | task209-56832290a8554bad8add383a57927c85 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Cellulosic ethanol
Argument: Cellulosic ethanol can generate good-paying jobs.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-39be161ea0c0404d918975ab5eeb52f1 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Hydrogen vehicles
Argument: Electric car battery technology and costs are improving rapidly.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-2b4e143e4d1d40a4abad74c50a0afc8b |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Filibuster
Argument: Filibuster helps flag controversial issues for the public.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-fea75c8882544f0dba36e9adf41a56c2 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Withdrawing from Iraq
Argument: Torturous and brutal tactics in Iraq have only worsened US moral credibility.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-94cb16ce5b474c2cba7618a08114e870 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Assault weapons ban in the United States
Argument: Semi-automatic weapons has not decimated animal populations.
Output:
| [
"against"
] | task209-5ef6ef0c24b14c73822a93fd4370b21f |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Carbon capture and storage
Argument: CCS can dramatically slash emissions from fossil fuels.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-93be629ad57e4db1b58a9eab7cf5ec63 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Abortion
Argument: Abortion may have a positive or neutral impact on the emotions of the women.
Output:
| [
"neutral"
] | task209-062d7ea2cae34b4b935566e1ac383d36 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: DREAM Act
Argument: University leaders almost universally support DREAM Act.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-c1ca98449bd44cbfaca08f34702afef5 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Manned mission to Mars
Argument: Committing to Mars will inspire NASA to make it happen.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-f7c8000047cd48988fbd99a8d929c9b3 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Airport security profiling
Argument: Profiling will help avoid invasive scanners and pat-downs.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-a3d4f15a78b7447ca997c69b3703fb66 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Earmarks
Argument: Earmarks are often unrelated to legislation; undemocratic.
Output:
| [
"against"
] | task209-b22f66fbb26e46939550fdd6bbd722e0 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Two-state plan respects democratic will for separate states.
Output:
| [
"in favor"
] | task209-1637b42de657414cabbe7d9410ab43cd |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Legality of coca production and consumption
Argument: Allowing coca undermines successful eradication efforts.
Output:
| [
"against"
] | task209-9649b6592bc04cd8ba06f61e01aefd2b |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Corporate free speech
Argument: More spending in elections undermines public confidence.
Output:
| [
"against"
] | task209-5c7815997fb34ecc8873abf692eb3956 |
Definition: Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances "in favor", "against", and "neutral".
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Three Gorges Dam
Argument: The Three Gorges Dam is a cause of corruption.
Output: against
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Argument: Idea of Jewish state, in two-state solution, is undemocratic.
Output: against
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Topic: Single-payer universal health care
Argument: Whether health care is a right under i-law is inconsequential.
Output: in favor
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Topic: Carbon emissions trading
Argument: A cap-and-trade system is progressive.
Output: neutral
Now complete the following example -
Input: Topic: Education vouchers
Argument: Vouchers drain talent from public schools, undermining competitiveness.
Output:
| [
"against"
] | task209-37add59f29174743b1b96e634e23f114 |