input
stringlengths 776
1.77k
| output
sequencelengths 1
1
| id
stringlengths 41
41
|
|---|---|---|
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Open challenge to Mr. Walter Ritte. Sir, you are a leader and champion of native Hawaiian causes. For that you have earned my respect and admiration. But the indigenous Hawaiian still suffers from unemployment and homelessness. Bill Aila had a chance to make some headway into solving some of these problems while he was the Director of the DLNR. A job given to Mr. Aila as a appeasement for his failed bid to become governor of Hawaii. Aila failed so he was made deputy director at Hawaiian Homes. I would ask that you look into the fact that there are no, zero, native Hawaiians that work as fishermen in the commercial long line industry. Hundreds of jobs catching Hawaiian fish are being taken by person unlawfully fishing. These are jobs that can get Hawaiian back to work immediately. Not a lot of training required and if paid properly can be a living wage. Look into this situation and if appropriate speak this this issue. You voice is clearly heard and respect by many. Thanks.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-00911f10afbf4bc29e5e55076c8cbe07 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: The "problem" as many of us see it is the fact that so many people see Trump's candidacy as a problem...it isn't. Trump may very well be our last chance to stop the formation of the North American Union where our borders are erased and we are flooded with otherwise illegal aliens on a scale we can only imagine. The loss of our sovereignty through the TPP and other bad trade agreements that have nothing to do with trade. Those are two of the problems...those "problems" are what Trump plans on taking on and if you dont think his success is hitting a nerve then just look at the awesome storm of lies and propaganda that has been unleashed against him recently. The deeper it gets the harder we need to push back harder and not allow ourselves to be swayed by it. Telling the truth about the invasion of this country thru Mexico isn't being racist just like criticizing Israel for their war crimes (including 911) is anti semitic ...it's just telling the truth
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-825c840e3b174ec881972b6c6ea0c2c3 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: $2000 for a "decent" counter top espresso machine? I had a $100 DeLonghi pump machine that made perfectly good espresso. I replaced it with a Gaggia Classic, because the DeLonghi died and I wanted something that would last, had replaceable parts, and was built by union workers making a living wage and good benefits. I bought the Gaggia, a burr grinder, stand, some cups, a frothing pitcher, and some descaler for $600 (it's about $100 more now). You can get one heck of an espresso machine for $2K.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-31ffe73878fa41afa2d55e9af7bc9a43 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Once the media digs deeper into tRump's underworld shenanigans, he may very well wind up in jail, but not before suing the American voters for dumping his juvenile pompous butt.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-9935f710d77a4e13b5e9447e31bfe22c |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: A vote for Hillary is a vote for more national debt and massive immigration of cultures that do not accept us. Obama has increased our debt more than all presidents combined. European countries have completely destroyed themselves by allowing massive immigration of muslims. Muslims make christian conservatives look like peace loving liberals. Germany is projected to be a muslim majority by 2060 due to child births, at that point you will see Sharia Law put into place and women will lose all the rights they have fought for. Sweden and Norway are practically destroyed. Sweden is the rape capital of the world.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-70a233716ff24b50bf24d1687754c9e8 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: The Reddington Ballroom is in the Lakefront Hotel, formerly known as the Millenium. Come on over and hook up with a free-lovin hippy chick or maybe score some killer weed.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-d5dd3df3b8cd4321823cfe021b9ae01a |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Are you alleging illegality? I'm not understanding....
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-66e97be2469c43a787eb23cd12b8c8ec |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: The usual feed for the Green Sheep.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-4fe803dde6d74d35995cd51bcc2885f0 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: First they slip a whole new level on the building at the last minute
Just a few million more
Now these so self important council idiots want special office space along with just a few million more and look behind a locked doors even
Then they could all take naps in peace discuses their little secret plans and refine their grand monument to them selves
Tax payers should ask why Eugene needs a fancy 100 million dollar building with all the fancy trim add it up 285 million for a new county courthouse what was it 300 million for the federal courthouse 100 million for ltd's scam on west 11th. But those are paid by state and fed money
But think it through where does that money come from. It comes from your taxes if you need help figuring it out
600 million out of peoples pay check so a bunch of self important bureaucrats can impress other self important bureaucrats and win awards
It's a place to do a job not a resort
open building with cubicles is all they need
Tax payer reward pot holes
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-83b865cd5d884ead91252ad75184d1d4 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: They are corrupted. They will act in the same manner, corrupted.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-a645075089e9440d8adb4f1ce05fbba8 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: It is unfortunate that those who sob about embryoes can't call a pump, a pump. It's convenient to handwave away a functioning brain, and sob about a pump, in order to try justify punishment for sex.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-e352b69fc0b94a5992dc3f22013f36fb |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: my friend, you have lost all credibility on this issue. the posts are singularly pointing out the same thing. does that not tell you that maybe it's you and not the other posters? perhaps some self education or a men's group discussing the issue...an anthropology class and how the awareness of what is inappropriate and the after effects of being victimized, including male victims? I would not want to believe that you are the stereotypical woman hater. resentful, empathic and ignorant, again in defined sense of the word - no name calling. please , just spend some time looking into the current information known about this transgression and violation of another.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-e7ab31652600440294c3c8468de47175 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Often there is a plea deal in these cases so the victim does not have to testify, which, particularly for children victims of sexual assault, only adds to their trauma.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-46f3cc91281a4425b159fe49b47bfa21 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: For 20 years we owned a shrimp broodstock company at NELHA at Keahole Point. We shipped our farm raised shrimp worldwide. Many nights when we took our boxed up shrimp to the Kona Airport, our big pile of boxes - like 100 - would be dwarfed by the boxes from the aquarium folks. They grossly underreport how many fish they take. This No Take zone is a good start at protecting our nearshore resources but more No Take zones are needed to replenish what's been decimated.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-84e231bef1cf4b7198da1918ceb85c2f |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I am woman, went to college, and made it through adulthood so far without being a victim. How? I knew not to create the opportunity, it's that simple. People say don't blame the victim, I get that, but I'm willing to bet $100 that in the majority of these cases of sexual violence, a window of opportunity was left open. "Alcohol doesn't cause sexual assault, it creates opportunity" is a perfect example, add weed to that as well. People let their guard down when substances are used to have fun. Whether the victim themselves are using it or not is not the singular factor -- but the environment of where the victim and perpetrator are can influence that so much, and to a degree, makes it so much easier for predator to find and assault his or her victim(s). Seems that Alaskans take more thought in protecting themselves from bears, moose, etc. than they do from sexual crimes. Prevention can be a help to this epidemic. It won't fix the problem, but it will definitely help mitigate it.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-7837a1c16d4c4fa9b1d556f4a5edd8af |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: "Saffron Colonial" is not an "overt expresson of racism" anymore than the "Victorian" homes that dot the neighborhood are overt expressions of sexual repression. It's a word that denotes a time and a place, nothing more.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-4dd401475d5c404895f4280742adb8ce |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Good well balanced article!
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-fe374e386c6d446ba056cec55d8c5239 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Let me put this one to sleep for you, Ridgefield; tRump isn't going to make it to the White House. Even in his wettest dream he won't make it to the White House. The wetness he'll feel is his bodyguards soaking him down with a fire hose to put out his narcissist attitude.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-e530f075608a438b9861a81af2848554 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I would have jumped his demon ass and beat the crap out of him if he had one of my cats.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-118df2545e26496ab90b303c89ad336d |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: He was in jail for acting out due to mental health issues. Yes, hugging someone, grabbing someones butt and grabbing for body parts without their consent is sexual assault. However, Mr. Bolus was mentally ill. We don't hold diabetics responsible when their blood surgar plunges and causes them to drive erratically like a drunk on a 3 day spree, why do you think it's any different for the mentally ill? In any case, he didn't deserve to die. From what I can see, the state was negligent.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-c7889c325c1f44b1b39516d35e86092b |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: No money to pay troopers.... who ya gonna call?
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-405379f9413243419408bc168237500a |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Apropos...
"Most of the events are public, but organizers are taking steps to make it difficult for media to cover them. This morning, PCC prepped the participants on how to deal with the media, warning them of "self-described journalists who file stories for blog sites." The school also informed them that media need to make arrangements with the PCC Public Relations Office in advance."
Orwell anticipated this too: In accordance with the principles of Doublethink, the 'PCC Public Relations Office' was called: "The Ministry of Truth", and equipped with a vascular system of document incinerators to be used on any documents which contradicted "the truth". (And a "Ministry of Justice" for use on their authors.)
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-3dbc5be28f60478699ccd9c1641acfd1 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: James, you are ignoring the fact that if the shoe had been on the other foot, and four MEN had violated an occupied WOMEN'S rest room, there would have been widespread media coverage and public outrage over the event. That is called "hypocrisy", something which you apparently do not understand.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-0732240061e44c008614c3ef5d148f56 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Dermot states, "Anchorage Sen. Lesil McGuire said it was probably the most important bill that anyone in the Senate would deal with."
What Dermot failed to state was that immediately after Gov. Walker's SB 128 passed the senate, McGuire, who carried Walker's water on this 'most important bill that anyone in the senate would deal with' jet-setted off to Germany with her ex, former house rep and convicted felon Tom Anderson.
After subjecting her colleagues and the public with months of her usual uncontrollable, emotional, tear-filled drama along every step of the way as she navigated Walker's Pick-the-Public's-Pocket bill, SB 128, McGuire shirks her official duties, again, and travels abroad, again.
Meanwhile the legislature, senate and house, is still in session and the band plays on...
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-1ef919b187554eba8a9f4c47f1d5b2ce |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Dick, we are all waiting; YOU first.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-26002cb3d4d04bceb3138b67087d3ca9 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Stevie, your comment that "if she were white" she'd be treated differently, is <i>classic</i> racism. Offer some evidence, or don't say it.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-fbc3161f3ead467ba682608d22cc7136 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I don't believe in the Tooth Fairy, the Easter Bunny or the literal words of Trump, Clinton, Sanders, Cruz or Rubio. They are all professional liars and politicians (if there is in fact a difference). None of them can accomplish what they say without the House and Senate. Or in Trump's case, without changing membership of the Supreme Court for some of his alleged agenda. The sky will not fall on January 20, 2017. Civilization as we know it will not disappear.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-40c81c09fe1d4dd6bbcf0a58ee0abbee |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: We need another FBI sting!!!! The sooner, the better.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-8e41cdd5ceca4ac795d17b2bffe7802a |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Excess Drinking and Fire Arms don't mix.
Either alcohol or guns should be banned on all UA campuses.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-b2df0190b8ae4f55a4025c1123b17cd5 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Except the selfish amazing dickheads that left him to die. What arrogance
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-f63b1ed480ff43bfb05d0b8372d0d8b9 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Senator Dan (R) Ohio, Alaska, looking out for any opportunity to cripple effective government.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-6c7db64ccf924e038e3ed4af205c2eae |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Probably just out for a quick spin.
My dog used to do that all the time.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-401f4fcf9f9847ee8fd0aee3e19f9302 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I have to say that being a Homeroid, I've never particularly cared for Seaton from way before him becoming a pol but I do appreciate him standing up to this nonsense, fully.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-da5bdea759b54674a042982a65333102 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: The site of her org at PSU gives the impression that she has completed her doctoral program but this article says she is still working on it. What are the facts? Also, $63,629 in salary and benefits for a part time job is pretty rich and that is quoted from 2013. Can only imagine that she given herself two or three raises since then. Portland is brimming with faux do-gooders who mostly benefit themselves. Here's another one.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-d9ab8f43f1b543a99ffc675572102527 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Wish I could have been there! I'm 64 and haven't been this motivated by a candidate since I was in my teens (when I couldn't vote). Feeling the Bern!
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-40ff650770fe4c1da53107a5cfe9da29 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Other than the inherent hypocricy, it really doesn't matter. Personally, as I've stated before, I don't judge candidates by gender. Male, Female, Lesbian, Gay, Bi-sexual or Transgender is pretty irrelevant for me. What are your polices and beliefs are what I'm interested in. For Gloria Steinem and Madeleine Albright, sex defines their politics and that's kind of sad. Any woman is better than any man seems to be their mantra. I'm glad to see that the younger generation seems to have a more liberal attitude than these old warriors who can't forget the past.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-a3bafc22119e45d998cc6781f522b09d |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I can't think of a worse way to spend my time and money than going on a cruise ship.The passengers on this tub are lucky,at least they will have a reasonably interesting story to tell.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-045b41f6824f48c0a1dad66efbee4d35 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Fair enough - I'm not a doc (at least not that kind), and I'm not arguing that physicians aren't highly trained. I also don't completely agree with your analysis, some of your figures, and some of your conclusions (it's OK, on many points I do agree with you). With that... if you will just hand me that erlenmeyer and step away from the homogenizer, I'll go back to my molecules, mice, and math.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-c3219aa21e50400296cd315aecf0eb3d |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I find it unfortunate that the media has latched on to the "gay nightclub" qualifier. It shouldn't matter. A gay nightclub, a school, a community center. People are slaughtered. It's more heartbreaking to me when it's children. We can go through the list: postal workers, students, concert-goers in Paris. Commuters, marathon spectators, employees in the WTC, movie goers. People. What they all have in common is that they're just going about their lives, just like we do. Boom or pop-pop-pop, they're dead, injured, damaged. Is it noteworthy that these people were gay? Maybe. Sort of. In the aftermath, politicians and LEOs will announce that this hate won't be tolerated. It doesn't mean that school shootings will be. It doesn't make any victim less important. The question is, how to prevent the next massacre?
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-1808774fcf924d75af1491cf3e30eb78 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I don't mind the empty chair per se, but if Clint Eastwood finds it . . .
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-34c4f36f6a9f4262a4424d6752842a0d |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: entitled much?
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-106f903b78c64297b1ae60d65b87adfd |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Girls that age often go nuts due to puberty. Their body is simply overwhelmed with hormones, and they lose all control and common sense.
Scientific studies have shown a clear correlation between kids who become sexually active, and their hormone levels. The kids with high levels just cannot control themselves. Social influences do not appear to have any significant effect.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-dfc26e66d8704f0da03932c769380c45 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: God grief! Have some common sense man.
Bill Clinton made an incredibly stupid decision to get a blow job from a young woman who was coming on to him. Good lord, the POTUS could have gotten more with less risk through discreet channels.
And, he dissembled; unwisely using lawyerly language in a futile attempt to get out of his predicament.
Both of these decision are fair game for criticism, and I am not excusing them.
However, he was hardly a "sexual predator."
-- Paul
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-f79fbbdb272a42d5bd9ef88497baf83a |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Every single day, I read the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Opinions. Almost without fail, there are several cases from the Board of Immigration Appeals where another convicted illegal immigrant's attorney is arguing that his particular client's United States convictions are not serious enough crimes to justify deporting him back to Mexico or elsewhere in Latin America.
I just checked, since February 24, 2016, there have been six (6) such opinions. That's better than one per week. And these are just where they bothered with a written opinion, the 'cream of the crop' as it were of criminal illegal immigrants.
And the 9th Circuit doesn't cover New Mexico or Texas or a lot of other border States.
I'll be glad to list the convictions that they were saying shouldn't require deportation, if you like. There are plenty of drug dealers and rapists in the mix as well as quite a few other crimes, of course.
I will also be happy to list the multiple deportations cases, if you like.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-9b79e689ca494abab0873a51c328367c |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: These are bikes w/ an engine.
They don't belong on trails that are designated for non-motorized traffic.
Take them to an ATV trail and don't bother ppl w/ your obnoxiousness.
Personally I'm an engineer and custom builder of many things and have built MANY motorized bikes and such and I love them...tho not too big a fan of electric transport...just not loud enough or fast/powerful enough in general...and batteries are a pain in the ass.
I know where my projects belong tho...and it's not on hiking trails.
...so if your ebikes are soooo badass take them where they belong.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-3d992ac5883a4d2a890eeac6cc5bb46c |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Don't exaggerate. Nobody's asking her to shut shop, only change the offensive names.
Ideological purity? We're asking for basic sensitivity here.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-23f7dec8bf14428f83c4e7b9f522757a |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: That is not a death caused by spice. Rape is already against the law. What is your point?
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-c3a4133189264769acb71fc791a0361b |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I believe the saddest thing that has happened since this Obama Care debacle has occurred:
is that, as an older Alaskan, I may struggle a bit more with medical costs, but the ones that I feel the most sad for, is the younger generation. They are the ones that will be 'burdened' more than we will be.
Most physician are no longer accepting Social Security, or Medicare recipients, so what will the upcoming 'oldsters' do? Just something to ponder..... Too scary for me to even think about........
I am most sorry for my grandchildren, and what they may be in store for, with regards to future medical care.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-54738ea4def34d58b2ad4daae446fc18 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Wow What a story...I'm serious. Great journalism. From my point of view the only issue with Vic was whether he could fairly judge a dispute between a man and a woman. Particularly a straight man. I could care less about his sexual preferences.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-4636f75f8107485382c6a2cd92950807 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: This article mentions "Tobacco", not vaping, cloves or duh da duh marijuana. But seriously, from a non smoker, why can't our keepers designate areas for smokers, why is that so tough? I have personally been more offended by pot smoke, loose dogs and badly throw baseballs and frisbees than from tobacco smoke.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-877759315d4d4a80a15247248b48d2fd |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: No, it's a pretty robust result that's obtained across the country. Steve Levitt from the University of Chicago has done some pretty accessible work outlining the analysis; I found a copy at http://melissa-morabito.wiki.uml.edu/file/view/[Levitt]2004.pdf .
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-44f9163288a648eaa7f3f9d56517a72a |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Kudos to Seth for telling the kids to turn off the tv. Television is destroying America. Everybody should turn it off.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-d56af2ca3a0a47d48062dc0904e572ef |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Did you hear? There's a whole 30 scientists in the film who disagree with the global scientific consensus!
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-a41349226cfb474b8083f76707cc3809 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Where do you see this info? It was not stated in the article.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-3a9cd5fba8e94e0babbd5cd4fc189807 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Peter, according to APOC records, Pete Kelly does not hold a job. Kelly spends 3 months in Juneau, and the rest of the year unemployed. This is the opposite of school teachers people like Kelly like to bash. Teachers work 9 months, and get 3 off. Kelly, and others like Coghill, "work" 3 months, and get 9 months off. Kelly and Coghill collect almost $100 grand for their 12 weeks of "work".
Lazy, uneducated people like this must be replaced for Alaska to have any chance.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-686a3399722c4de79363760b9e1fbad5 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I say grow that shit like a jungle
Give 'em something strong to hold onto
Let it fly in the open wind
If it get too bushy you can trim
(Amanda Palmer)
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-eda5e84870df4c56b753b2c9976a418e |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: just a non-related coincidence....................so minor a point it just never crossed her mind there was an obvious conflict. That half a billion dollar road would cost 20-30 million a year to maintain. The Ferry system brings in more money to Alaska than it costs to run. The road to McKinnon`s mine will only cost the taxpayer more revenue, as the rape ruin and run boys, like the slope cartel, continue to socialize the costs of continuing work on their legacy state oil and gas leases, and privatize the profits.
Remember the "ALEC" pledge to stop any taxes? by the current conoco caucus birds on the second floor in Juneau? http://www.adn.com/politics/article/lawmakers-anti-tax-pledge-could-pose-challenge-alaska-gov-walkers-fiscal-plan-0/2015/11/08/ Just who do they owe allegiance to? Grover Norquist and the right wingers?.. or the people of Alaska who are asking for fiscal fixes from this same bunch? Please tell your legislators and senators to act prudently with a fix.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-c4ccf4f292c247a084c7111ee5ee6986 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: True. Anyone that thinks that a boy is simply going to claim that he’s a girl to make the team hasn't thought this thru. This is school where everyone knows everyone. That means that the kid is going to have to live as a girl 24/7. Makeup. Hair. Clothing. No hanging with his male friends. No male sports. Not to mention that he’s just removed himself from the hetero dating pool, pretty much permanently. And that’s not even considering what his former male buds will call him. Gay and fag are among the kinder words. And then we get to the physical bullying - 10% of trans people have been physically or sexually assaulted.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-b4ebe7c7d7eb4895b4da2838bd01440e |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Why are these programs having money being cut from their budgets and our legislators WANT new, and second, and expensive cushy digs in which to NOT do their public service jobs in? UGH!
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-8d6d5dccd90d4f9bbed2968c940d52a2 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Agree. Hope they give Hillary equal time, detailing how she destroyed Bill's lovers
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-dfbc77176fe54c61b6bf4f231e52b73e |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: That is quite an accusation - I would say that it sounds like you're someone who has no experience either in life or in the court system.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-df928ef975b24f7ea1c59943e5261799 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I think I heard they left from school.... mother would not be the one supervising her at school....
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-899024d74b594b1381f4f644960b1ed6 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: You are correct Alascat ... without evidence, it is only a conspiracy theory. I do know this though ... I'm seriously watching Northern Dynasty stock prices, and as soon as I see any hint of a possible big move, I'm getting as many shares as I can, that don't bump up the price because of my buy. And if it works out according to my suspicions, maybe sell at a good profit?
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-c2e77888554b436c8a3dafdfb4277c20 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: your logic and understanding are fatally flawed.
you fail to grasp the true concept of the word "patriot"
nobody is going to force you into a homosexual marriage against your will. that is the extent of your "rights" on the subject.
nobody wants your church to marry homosexuals. they want your church to cease the un-American practice of imposing your will on others for no other reason than that you can and always have.
again... "patriotism", you're doing it wrong!
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-b2139dee35c748f1b372ed78ccf1d2ba |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: If the sight of 20 dead children in a school room in the US did not change their mind, what make anyone think that the NRA and their followers will allow reasonable gun control after the massacre in Orlando?
Ain't gonna happen.
A dramatic increase in gun and ammunition taxes is needed to pay for the medical cost and grief of the thousands of innocent Americans shot, injured or killed, sacrificing their lives for the Second Amendment. Who pays for all these individual tragedies that may last a life-time. These are the real soldiers, not ammosexuals and other Rambo wannabes. $1 a bullet, $200 for each new gun purchase. This would be The Second Amendment Injury Fund.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-859a27acfcf449618b57404515beb3f1 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Drug use and resulting homelessness have many root causes, so maybe we should withhold quick condemnation of every homeless person. Yes, some of the alcohol/drug addicted homeless people made bad lifestyle choices and have ended up where they are as a result. However, not all alcohol/drug addicted homeless people ended up this way because one day they decided this was the life they wanted to live. Unfortunately for many, childhood issues of neglect and abuse are the root cause that led to this result. When a child is abused mentally, physically, or sexually, often alcohol/drug use becomes their escape to ease the pain; they're not mentally mature enough to realize the detrimental effects of their actions.
I have been blessed and have never had to deal with any of these issues, but I am empathetic to the issue of homelessness in our community and help with and donate to various St. Vincent de Paul entities because they excel at addressing homelessness issues in our community.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-c924c746353e4124a5c8768af949392d |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Wait, you can't have your own dog run loose in your own yard now? The dog never bit any one right? You are totally missing the point you cannot have some random guy popping off rounds pointed towards someones home and in a neighborhood, everytime they feel scared.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-f04e05ab4c6d43f8af6853a83743eec2 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Can you pronounce Benghazi? She's a criminal and a known liar, you can't hide that facts.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-3c642e4c63d4484397ab936478bfe952 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: How come if I steal a $.99 cent Reese's Peanut Butter Cup from Fred Myers in Anchorage,I get 6 months in jail,but when a politician steals $800,000 dollars of Tax Payers money,they get a "recall election" ?
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-b476f752bf734f1aacb6babe9535d698 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: OH BALLS------or complete LACK there -of-----what nonsense
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-95c4beff88f044e5a530c77100b1d036 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: You didn't mind it when they pumped hundreds of billions of dollars out of rural Alaska, did you? The idea that urban Alaska pays its way is a joke. Urban Alaska is at least as dependent on Federal and State spending as rural Alaska is.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-0dca00dbaa3c44a9946998870d7a3a43 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: The legislature is run by 'Committee' so getting anything done is a slow process and that is a good thing..!!..I hope they do not do anything until something is done to bring our out of control spending under control The State does not have an income problem....it has a spending problem,,,and a bloated government than long ago stopped working for its people.. we do not need an income tax or anyone messing with the PFD right now....
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-80a9e94e764c4604b64019baf8241b7a |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Sorry, he's delusional. He lost because of his personality.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-bf2acd090b2e4db69db146e1cae21cef |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Sex sells, even in the digital age. Gotta get clicks.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-e060b75cc68f490d89bf66f25012fcd0 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Alaska natives are at the very top of the charts in the whole USA for Child abuse, spouse abuse, rape, incest, ect..ect..the list goes on. It is part of the culture. You can defend them all you want but thousands of natives suffer because of this sick perverted mentality. I know there are are good , loving natives but per capita there are a huge amount of sickos who rape and molest their own family members. More then any other culture in the whole USA. Nothing to be proud of at all. So many should be ashamed.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-6595c4fd22ae4731b0adb08d5e4db7f8 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Sounds like the prices and the confusing menus and the inconsistent service (which cart pods don't provide) and...
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-59f1b8e05f3e4e0cbc317d9357781812 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: It was a pep rally designed to energize his base in Eugene. I attended, and as I walked out, I noticed all the protesters on the 13th Avenue side of the chain link fence. What was truly "pathetic", was the visual they provided. They looked like a bunch of rabid animals in a cage, foaming at the mouth.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-867a547f7d464096b66f53116e656de8 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: except they are both idiots.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-9b70d9bb48bc4e6b8387bf90ba106bd1 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: You Miss the Point by a Mile Rabbit Boy :-)
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-de00989cf4db42c1a2f063034e20083d |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I guess I would add that the vessel would need prevailing currents/tides for the sea anchor to be effective. I do believe the Kulluk could have benefited with time to reconnect the tow wire. The Kulluk came down to a poor decision. A giant sea anchor is not the answer, especially at the tune of $500K per. The great circle route has mandated a tug in Dutch for 20 years!
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-da6f23df778441cb87cf6361cc9408ed |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: That's a silly response. First, Copernicus illustrated the movement of the planets around the sun. Not the sun around the planet. Second, what human intervention occurs in relation to the sun? We have a direct influence on the earth's environment as we interact with it every moment of every day. Don't think that's the case with the sun. Third, going back to the OP's post and using that to rif on a favorite conservative position - As it is prudent to assume that all 'others' are looking to rob, kill, or rape us it is thus only prudent to carry a gun everywhere, why is it not prudent in the face of our possible (though, really the data clearly points to our complicity in accelerating climate change) involvement in accelerating climate change to take actions to prevent or combat, much like feeling the need to carry a weapon to prevent or combat a theoretical attack?
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-28ca67bd11a647cda5042c190161247e |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Contact your legislators and tell them to get on the ball. They are failing you by throwing up their hands and pointing the blame-finger at President Obama.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-a4bf4d4e8aeb414ebde7285defb5aac6 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Good article Mr. Barrett as to how the TAPS operates. What is left out of this article is the fact that Alaskans are giving away oil daily. Alaska does get about one/eighth of the production from the legacy fields which is called royalty oil. This oil is sold to Tesoro and the money goes in the state treasury. That revenue is paid back to the drillers in the form of tax credits.Most of the 500,000 barrels daily Alaska receives nothing for. This is a theft of public resources on a scale unheard of. $21 million daily going down the pipe. SB21 written by oil lawyers and passed by oil employees posing as Legislators has defrauded the people. SB21 must be repealed along with tax credits. A straight production tax per barrel is the only way to not be cheated by the oil accountants. No state employee has the assets or ability to match wits with oil accountants. We need leadership with morals and backbone.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-d13a970aac8f4fb79c53be060777e534 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Tina, no one here implied "racism is dead." The point is that the tone of this opinion piece is that of racial reparations. No one today "owes" anything, and saying "it's not about race" and then making a story of something based ONLY on race is rediculous.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-ec53b7f6a7434363bb05b4ac5fb0781f |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: this post ... it's not bad or offensive, just a bit rough when the story is about someone you know. I don't think many people don't know the cause, and effect, of lung cancer. if anyone is terrified more than ms dolan, I would be surprised. a few years back a friend was in the early stages of emphysema and we spoke of it briefly and he mentioned that ...dying was inevitable - unthinking - I asked him about how it would impact his family.. witnessing his illness....living with it...watching him struggle. we didn't speak of it again and he quit working soon after. a couple years later I saw he and is wife at the dog park - he looked like a scarecrow and was desperately sucking on oxygen. I don't know who began crying first but we didn't say more than a quick hi. I remembered every word of our conversation...as did he . stupid me and god bless him, he passed not long after.
I wish this lady all the support and care and love in the world - she's tough
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-6c3b160d55dd48beb9f2489557df254e |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Could you clarify, something for me? If a person is born with a penis and testes, it is male, right? And if a person is born with a vagina and a uteris, it is female, correct? As far as I know, the physical attributes each human is born with is not a matter of choice. After birth, humans have many years to make a decision as to what their sexuality will be or even may be born understanding what their sexuality will be at sexual maturity. Some may even identify as being a different sex than at birth. I agree that there are perhaps lesser or greater variations of bi-sexuality that permeate all human beings to a lesser or greater extent. The exploration and discovery about ourselves continues and will be either exciting or dreaded, depending on your views and experiences.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-6f6a6d53e5164d31a7aff7a577ea440a |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Larry, so you understand the significance of the problem- the pending extinction of elephants and rhinos, but you want to make zero sacrifice to do anything about it?
Many poor Africans argue they need to kill elephants to make money- and none of these Africans are getting annual Permanent Fund Dividend checks, or the numerous other welfare benefits that are doled out in Alaska.
There have been many cases where walrus have been illegally slaughtered in Western Alaska- only to take tusks. A recent, vile case involved the killing of many walrus with semi- automatic weapons, and the only thing harvested were the tusks.
Where do you think the Chinese are going to turn when they can no longer illegally import elephant and rhino ivory due to loss of these animals?
And you do understand walrus are under significant threat due to the loss of sea ice?
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-9fa2e5443ea24459a197c3b8e9aa4a28 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Wikipedia:
Homophobia encompasses a range of negative attitudes and feelings toward homosexuality or people who are identified or perceived as being lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender (LGBT).[1][2][3] It has been defined as contempt, prejudice, aversion, hatred or antipathy, may be based on irrational fear, and is sometimes related to religious beliefs.[4]
I don't need to meet Trump or McKinley to know they are bigots. I will say whatever I want about you or him, " my friend"
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-4539b3b04b884c7eaa0e6c9f6ac08735 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Thank you for writing about this. It seems to get worse each year. People just have no respect for nature and yourselves along with us who live here!!!
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-b25edc743c4b429d9c51df6937df9e27 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Thanks for the update.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-6d5bb0ce913b4c5586b022306114cd52 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I hope he recovers OK.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-a2fa18d9434f4424a9c8ea721b2b2982 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: If you want your name kept private, then keep your sex in private.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-2156f3bb459b467198eb293c7ce310a1 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: There will be plenty of federal jobs when our overlords learn our State is too dysfunctional to operate. Kiss your independent ass goodbye cuz the Legislature just lost it.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-9e26db4f9c58492b9150a8db2b4909cc |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I noticed the absence of the $700 million in tax credits that's suppose to be paid out next year. This is why I hate Republican legislators' rhetoric. Stop your lying Giessel. Poop or get off the pot. Surely there's some other worthy soul out there that can't be bought and will put Alaska First. Smarter op-ed writers have already advised the public about what's going on with Big Oil tax credit giveaway. Go back to sleep, Giessel or which ever staffer wrote your commentary.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-625cfa4e53834d93814b06b9fd36fb5e |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: The cost-shifting from the State to local (and especially Anchorage) property owners, seniors, and our "best and brightest" kids (should start making some of the balanced revenue components of Walker's plan look better and better to those who have refused to consider them. Do they really think it's better to dump all the burden on (voting) residents and kids,, but leave hundreds of millions in oil tax credits untouched?
If they don't want to kill the credits, they could at the least put them in abeyance until oil prices recover sharply, or there is a blue moon - whichever comes first...
As far as Anchorage goes, would it really kill us to implement a sales tax to cover some local costs? It could be tailored to be minimally regressive, and to capture at least something from visitors.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-ad9c64f916754e189441f0dd9d8a39ba |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: You must be a democrat. Democrats vote overwhelmingly for us to wage war on them, then forget what we are over there for and blame it all on the republicans.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-691a442f29dd41e9a70af827dfeddd8b |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comparing banning dogs at a community event with banning 98% of our local small businesses who are denied access to public land, is the argument of a fool. I advocate honoring diversity, equal access to all, equal rights, and equal opportunity. You promote economic bigotry and discrimination. I expect you to spew straw that is an insult to intelligence,.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-56207c984f2747bab1add15cb5feb354 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Discussion of gravity waves has been ongoing for many decades. Gravity waves are similar in concept to electromagnetic waves, i.e. radio, light, X-rays, etc. Gravity, however, is much weaker than electromagnetic forces. Just as electric current moving back and forth in an antenna creates radio waves, objects moving around each other in orbits emit gravitational waves. Because gravity is so much weaker than electromagnetic forces, it takes truly massive objects to make gravitational waves we can detect. Everybody expected gravitational waves to exist, the challenge was to make a receiver sensitive enough to detect them. Basically no practical importance as far as human existence is concerned. However, the detection of the gravitational waves is a brilliant feat of experimental physics.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-fe03c8aed28f4ae0a37b2bbdeb9d2008 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Rick, you say delays caused by external forces, Lingle not signing off on the EIS for over a year. Lingle received the EIS in June of 2010 which was quickly signed by Abercrombie in Dec. 2010. Lingle did not want to sign for because of concerns about the project’s financial foundation, and basically she was right about it. Paulette Kelekini, sued because the city didn't follow State law regarding the AIS for projects. And the lawsuits by Cayetano, Work on rail was never stopped by a court order on any of the lawsuits brought on by Cayetano and company. What about the delays caused by the city. Issuing contracts in 2009 yet never got the ok to start construction by the FTA until 2012. You need to stop blaming others and start putting blame where it belongs. All delays were fault and caused by the city. If the city had not rushed this project, and done everything by the book, none of this would have happened.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-341deae3f8b74d1299d88ab80be5d397 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: The country was ready for a black man to be president 7 years ago but made a terrible mistake picking Obama.. there were several black men out there who could have been great presidents but Obama was not one of them and his terms of distruction are almost at an end. The Nation it is ready for a female as well but not Mrs. Clinton....the women is clearly a very evil person and would destroy everything Obama has left standing...The Nation needs leadership and she has nothing but more division to offer....
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-6f402df608b848b9bc31072a49d95832 |