text
stringlengths 0
4.07k
| labels
sequence | encoded_labels
sequence | lang
stringclasses 1
value | has_toxic
int64 0
1
| has_profane
int64 0
1
| has_insult
int64 0
1
| has_hate
int64 0
1
| has_threat
int64 0
1
| has_sexual
int64 0
1
| has_offensive
int64 0
1
| has_selfharm
int64 0
1
| has_harassment
int64 0
1
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Always good to have the ignorant and mentally defective getting together. Die soon | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
0,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Crimea/Ukraine articles
Hi HJ. In the message you left on my talk page (here), you explained your reasoning for not protecting the relevant articles. As my response there indicates I don't share your opinion, but I understand where you're coming from. In that comment you also said ""I'd really like to avoid protecting them for the duration if that can be avoided, but if you keep bringing issues to my attention, I'll do my utmost to make your life easier"". So this is the ""bring the issues to your attention"" on my part. See this 3RR request filed by User:Kudzu1. It's sort of gone past ""lots of disruptive anon IPs"" causing trouble on these pages, to pretty much full blown sock puppetry and abuse of multiple accounts by at least - though likely, more - one person. So. How can my life be made easier? SPI? I already filed one, on one sock master (though that's probably a different person) and some other users have filed others (for example ). The problem is - and notice that a CU has not even gotten around to the SPI I filed - that by the time the CUs get around to considering these cases, the person(s) behind these accounts have already thrown them away and moved onto new SPAs which keep doing the same thing. Not sure what the best course of action here is but it's helluva frustrating trying to deal with this. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I understood it to be a term of art, not a literal enunciation of a belief that a disembodied deity had possessed the bodies of humans in eastern Virginia at the polling booth. Such a notion would be inconsistent with Brat's free will theology and none of the RS that includes this quote have indicated he meant it as anything more than a literary flourish. If they were unambiguous he intended to communicate he was in contact with God or some other super-being then we'd have something. But they didn't. Right now we're making a scrapbook, rather than an encyclopedia article. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
To add, The Belfast Telegraph (6 April 2012) states: ""After leaving Banbridge, Lewthwaite moved back to England, where she was born, along with her Ulster mother Christine and father Andrew, who had served as a soldier."" Sorbet " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I just went to the user page and cannot find this icon, nor is the connotation {Reviewer topicon} anywhere in my writing. What are you seeing that I am not? | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Thanks, that's nice of you to say. Good luck to you too. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
No! This is a GROUP EFFORT! Wikipedia is a collaborative COMMUNITY and there are no school essays here. The article needs to be more professional and adopt a better title besides the references. This is all that needs to be done, so get off your high horse and accomplish what you want to see done. If you have these goals, then put yourself to the test of solving this problem. That's what I do whenever something perturbs me. You're just looking for a fight about something you admittedly care nothing about. How about I come by your house and criticise your gardens? ""Why?"" You say. ""Because they are too fucking ugly and I don't like the way they don't blend in with the neighbours' yards. So tacky, but I'm only passing by and I've never been down this road before."" 15:24, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)" | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
I am not asking for unblock - but can someone clarify is my block forever? " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Please see the RM at Talk:Stawamus (village)#Requested move, and I could list a few RMs and CfDs about Squamish titles also i.e. Squamish BC vs Squamish people/Skwxwu7mesh likewise but for now, unfortunately, that's a DEADHORSE because of all the people not really familiar with either and not in a position to know what the PRIMARYTOPIC is, or just hostile to native names altogether. All were substantially authored as well as titled by | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Where the Hell is Kisame's Section?
Well? and dont bother telling me to sign my post, cuz i cant figure out how | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Wow, you really are taking this very personally. Calm down. Also, do you realize how racist your above comment is? Japanese are no more inherently docile than any other race. That you would suggest so genuinely offends me. 99.231.241.146 | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. talk " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
M!ssundaztood
Your recent contribution(s) to are very much appreciated. However, you did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. If sources are left unreferenced, it may count as original research, which is not allowed. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in the article? You can use a citation method listed at inline citations that best suits each article. Thanks! | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Regarding edits made during September 27 2006 (UTC)
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. If this IP address is shared by multiple users and you have not made any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
V6FS Max Size
This may sound random, but Wikipedia led me astray on my home work and I should try to prevent it for others. The given max size in:
""The actual maximum was 8,847,360 bytes, with 7 singly-indirect blocks and 1 doubly-indirect block; PWB/UNIX 1.0's variant had 8 singly-indirect blocks, making the maximum 524,288 bytes or half a MiB.""
is incorrect.
According to the Version 6 Manual, http://wwwlehre.dhbw-stuttgart.de/~helbig/os/v6/doc/V/fs.html, the max size is 32, but cannot be larger than 16 bue to only storing 24-bits of filesize info in each inode rather than 25. The 8,847,360 number obtained above was the result of calculating it with 4 byte addresses, which is obviously incorrect given the definition in the manual. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
see no danger in this remaining a legal supplement, as it does work well for short periods of time, and has an awful sour taste to it, thus preventing any drugging of unsuspecting people. It takes hours to begin working anyway, so that wouldn't be an issue.
I | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
As it has become apparent that your account will be used solely for unconstructive editing, you have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest it by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} to this page. (talk) " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"The navigation template goes into the article ==
Where the heck do you wantit to go? Bottom of the page? Not the ""standard format"", but it works for me, for now.
== " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
KISS MY DICK
...ALL 3 OF YOU | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Lol your edits
24.129.237.34 | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
RopeMarks bondage picture
Your recent move from Bondage (BDSM) to Bondage (sexual) has caused the image link to the picture of a female bondage model I took at BoundCon 2008 to break. The reason is that, because of frequent vandalism, this image was added to MediaWiki:Bad image list, where it was set that it can only be shown at Bondage (BDSM), Rope bondage and BoundCon. Your recent move requires a change to this list, but I'm not sure how to go about to request such a change. | Talk " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Added a stub for article Duos II. (2¢) " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The definition is extended so that it eats also functions. A function from M to R^n would still be a function and NOT a tangent vector. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Main Page
I think whoever is really writing this article should try to get it featured on the main page before the election, because after the election who cares? | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"I'm back. I already created ID (occasionally forget to log in but you can see the same class C when I do) I collected a massive number of diff edits on Balkanfever who pretends to be neutral but is on record] getting blocked for saying this about Greeks under a previous handle. (not to mention his personal talk page is one big anti-Greek rant fest pointing to questionable FYROM news sources with highly exaggerated sensationalist titles) ""No, Assfuckers (has a nice ring to it D) use it as a pejorative term. I was ready to pull the trigger on both him, admin Futper, and a few others (e.g. Macedoniaboy who says he is a ""proud fighter for united Macedonia on his talk page) with a detailed complaint about anti-Greek propaganda but since Futper managed a civil discussion with me and now seems to be sticking to debating articles (rather than threats of blocking) I'm going to avoid escalating this further for now. ns. As for the current naming disputing article... I agree with you that some FYROM citizens honestly believe their claims but I don't think that reduces the existential threat to Greece. Communism fell 17 years ago in Yugoslavia and the FYROM government appears to be getting worse not better (imagine if in two hundred years they call themselves ""ethnic Athenians"" and the cycle continues until their is no Greece left). There appear to be important quotes missing from the naming dispute article that clearly demonstrate that FYROM leadership are confused about their own national identity (and confusing their own citizens in the process unfortunately). I tried to add this to the talk page of the article but Futper deleted it (arguing ancient Macedon is unrelated to the article even though his own editing history shows him adding an edit arguing that ancient Macedon wasn't Greek) I didn't want to get into a revert war over simply a discussion of perceived facts but since I didn't think those facts should be censored either I thought perhaps you could add them to discussion on the naming dispute talk page. (assuming you see it as relevant yourself of course) February 26, 1992: The F | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
YROM's President Kirov Gligorov, at an interview by the Foreign Information Service daily report, Easten Europe, stated: '""We are Slavs, who came to the region in the sixth century. We are not descendants of the ancient Macedonians.' ""January 22, 1999: The FYROM's Ambassador in Washington D.C., Mrs. Ljubica Acevska, gave a speech on the present situation in the Balkans, she stated: '""We do not claim to be descendants of Alexander the Great. We are Slavs and we speak a Slavic language. Greece is The FYROM's second largest trading partner and its number one ""investor.""' February 24, 1999: The FYROM.'s Ambassador to Canada, Gyordan Veselinov, in an interview with the ""Ottawa Citizen"", he admitted: '""We are not related to the northern Greeks who produced leaders like Philip and Alexander the Great. We are Slavs and our language is closely related to Bulgarian. There is some confusion about our identity.""' I think the above needs to be compared to that of their current hard line prime minister's recent behavior. He directly contradicts FYROM's own government's previous comments about themselves (that apparently was unauthentically meant to assure foreigners that Greeks were imagining FYROM propaganda and to reduce the issue to a childish dispute over simply names.. in order to get recognition) Prime Minister Gruevski officially meets Prince Ghazanfar of Pakistan] who claims to be related to Alexander the Great.. then uses it as an opportunity to suggest FYROM citizens are related to ancient Macedonians. (and don't get me started on that incident where Gruevski layed a wreath where a picture of ""United Macedonia"" was clearly present... which also seems to be missing from the existing article) " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Name
The college has changed its name to simply Collin College, and did that over a year ago. Furthermore they now have a program that is a venture with several major universities whereby they offer Bachelors, Masters, and Doctoral Degrees. This along with a student body of over 45K, should the 'community college' part of the name be removed? | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Upcoming album, Screaming Bloody Murder
This seems legit. The catalog number seems real. See , found after I did a Google search using the catalog number from the Allmusic listing of the album. meh " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Too many parentheses.
It sounds to personal with all those parentheses. Can someone please clean that up? | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Can you, or anyone, please tell me what's going on? Email me or something, whatever it takes. This is ridiculous. I don't care for games. ++: t/c | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I contacted you, and only you, because you are currently the only one who has said that POV problems remain, but you have not chosen to elaborate on the talk page. I am therefore inviting you to return to the article talk page and enumerate those concerns so that we can discuss them. Given that the article has changed substantially since you made your original post regarding POV issues, it is even more necessary to be specific about what particular things you see as problematic. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Merit badge collecting FAC
I have put this article Merit badge collecting (BSA) up as a Featured Article Candidate. Many improvements have been made this week. I thought may like to look at it again and if so inclined, vote on it. Thanks | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
The source clearly says or criticise it in any way. So where is the misunderstanding, I think it cannot be read in more then one way? According to the quote, general criticism of Soviet Union will become illegal. And I must say that I find this to be a truly sad day for Russia, when that happens. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Articles
Ive just deleted The Bug3r3r Team (or however that was spelled), and notice 2 other deletion requests on other articles here. I also read your note on that article's talk page, and think you may be misunderstanding the purpose of Wikipedia. We only allow articles on subjects that are notable; generally, this means that they have been discussed in detail in multiple, independent reliable sources. That means that a company that's just recently started, that has never produced a product, and that, by the way those were written, seem closer to a group of friends, is not a suitable subject for a WP article. Basically, if you can't find a number of newspaper (etc.) articles discussing the company, it shouldn't have an article. I hope this explains why these articles were deleted.
In connection to this, I need to ask you to stop creating articles on businesses of this type. Continuing to do so adds extra work for other editors and administrators, and these are clearly non-notable companies (so much so that we used the expedited Speedy Deletion Process). | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Hello friend
Just to tell you that I cannot tolerate wrong information on wikipedia.
You guys have to give all aspects of a information, be it good, bad, acceptable, unacceptable, or controversial, without hiding anything to make the information complete. Wikipedia is the information people trust upon, so it implies that has to be 100% true. Be bold, that is how you can bring a change, you are in the position to do just that.
One who fears, has a very good reason, that he cannot face the truth. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
By the way, what is meant by ""Unmet human needs""? - " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"::::::::There's another good section of WP:V, one of the three principal policy statements of the Wikipedia project. It's called WP:SOURCES:
Articles should be based on reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. .... In general, the best sources have a professional structure in place for checking or analyzing facts, legal issues, evidence, and arguments .... Material from reliable non-academic sources may also be used, particularly if it appears in respected mainstream publications. Other reliable sources include university-level textbooks, books published by respected publishing houses, magazines, journals, and mainstream newspapers.
Please explain Trine Day's fact-checking process to me, and post a few links demonstrating their reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. Prove to me that it's a ""respected publishing house.""
" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
":::You just don't give up do you? Why don't you try doing something positive, ""stats section is unencyclopedic"". It's getting really stale. a couple of comments here and there, from the peanut gallery, doesn't dictate policy. How statisistics on eating disorders on an article on eating disorders is ""uncyclopedic"", is beyond me. This is being positive , contributing images and information that might actually be interesting or useful, at least I make the effort. As I understand personal attacks are a no no, but criticising the content is not, criticising the content is a bit hard to do in some cases, because there is little to no content to criticise. It also seems that does who criticise the most contribute the least. Like this,, oops there is nothing there. Just to reiterate a fact, there was no interest displayed by you in this article at all, despite the fact that you have been on Wikipedia for years, now it seems to be a pressing concern.
" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Condolences to you, your wife and family...my prayers are with you.. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
You Need To Stop.
What difference does it make if the episodes of ANY show have their own articles? You're acting like a major geek. Will WP collapse within itself if it's not perfect? I think the Joker said it best when he said:
THE ONLY SENSIBLE WAY TO LIVE IN THIS WORLD IS WITHOUT RULES
And don't EVEN try to tell me that WP would be terrible without rules. You can have moderators to stop vandalism, JUST STOP FUCKING REDIRECTING. It's getting on my nerves, along with about 75% of WP users. | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
REDIRECT Talk:1954–55 Mexican Primera División season | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
I love Wikipedia
This place is hilarious! Why isn't the article protected? Is there a possibility that something special might happen in his life which would need to be include in the article? I imagine that this page is an absolute magnet for looney tunes without Wikipedia accounts. I'm not sure, but I think there are still some parts which say that he is ""supposedly"" dead, but these might have already been fixed by the recent revert. In case I've been logged out again (damn cookies!) I'm " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Vacuum_Insulated_Evaporator
Hello,
How would I go about seeking permission to use your image of the Vacuum Insulated Evaporator my an online e-course I am developing on medical gases please?
Thank you,
Rachelle 193.62.3.251 | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
This picture doesn't make sense.
That looks closer to Pluto being 18% of the size of Earth if they were both 2-dimensional objects. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
.
If one did leave out carbon atoms then that would not be correct. Example, what would methamphetamine be if you left out a carbon atom?
What are left out are hydrogen atoms and they should be, since it has been previously pointed out, they would unduly clutter the diagram and are unnescesary as being implyed anyway | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
GAN for 2013 Cotton Bowl Classic
Thanks for reviewing the American football GA - I've decided to review one of the articles you had for GA because that is a pretty significant game and would be a good GA if passed. Nidhiki05 " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Sorry: I went to the right page and provided an explanation there and above here in this talk page I thought (maybe it didn't get saved?), but the tag didn't look the way I thought it was going to look. I just wanted the graphic tag, not the whole page. I used didn't work the way I thought it was working. I'm trying to find the right tag. The explanation is in the talk page I thought. I'll look for the right link to it. I've run out of time for this, and I'm very tired at this point. So I don't know how soon I can find what is needed.NYScholar | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Coming back to this issue I'd like to combine these into Oregon legislative elections, 2008. For one thing, it meshes better with the legislative session articles I've been working on between every two session articles is one election article, and vice-versa. For another, both these articles are pretty short, and combining them would make for a nice sized article. Finally, because of the nice clean structure you made, it would be a very easy merge to accomplish. OK by you? - | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
There's nothing further to discuss. Talk " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
(outdent) How about looking at it like this. RPG rulebooks are just that. The rulebook explains how to play the game, but it is not the game itself. The ISBN manual you reference below supports this; games ""SHALL NOT"" be given ISBNs. There may be some confusion in the matter, but one good example is found by harking back to AD&D; 2nd Ed. To play that game required (it being rules heavy, that really is pretty much true) a minimum of two books—the DM Guide and the Players' Handbook. Neither ""contained"" the game, and the game went far beyond what was in either. The game in all its entirety encompassed the contents of many books, magazine articles, supplements, pamphlets, online articles and what was in the head of the players. The book is about the game; it is not the game.
For that matter, a number of the articles you tagged did not list an ISBN, so you can't really claim that you claimed it was a book in ignorance because of the ISBN. A publisher doesn't mean it's a book, as board games, computer games, and any number of things are published and have publishers.
" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"Wangi said>>> who are you Reswobslc, or stupidcupid? Well now you show yourself in your true colours for all to see. Now you accuse me of being two users? You find that a worthwhile comment? Now your making yourself look stupid. Well done! Wangi said>>> I'm sorry if you think pointing out that in fact I didn't do something you alleged me to is a ""weak response"", If I quote another user, and then reply to that quote, forgive me for making this sound simple but..99% of users would know im addressing my remarks to the person being quoted. Of course if your saying you weren’t sure if those were your remarks or not, that you could read through a couple of paragraphs to refresh your memory as to whether you said that or not than of course its all my fault. I should have placed a 12 foot banner saying THIS QUOTE IS NOT FROM WANGI!....maybe I should do that for every post? Or maybe your saying you post as more than one user and you forgot which ID you used? Wangi said>>> but I'm getting a little pissed off here with your lack of care for facts - if you're going to say I did or said something then please be careful enough to make sure I did do/say those things. Well yes we see your use of the English language in all its glory once again here. If every post must specify whther its addressed at you or not I can see how frustrating it must be reading through wiki at all. Wang said>>> Wikipedia is an encyclopedia: not a link directory, and not a tourist guide"" - makes plenty sense to me. Yes it does make sense. Of course you left out the context of my question which relates not to the general point of wiki but to the bias of some users (you) to which links they want to see. We already know you alone claimed the first link was spam and you removed it on that basis. Even users who don’t think the link should have been there agreed it was not spam. So your poor judgment is not in doubt. Your following days of rant showed your true reason for not wanting the link, it was because you didn’t like the idea of the site also selling hotel rooms. The link to the visitor centre is still there | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
by the way, which shows it was regarded as being a legitimate item to link to. My point still remains that if its worth linking to the first link was far more useful to the general public. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
ANI is a waste of time. That's where the school of piranha lives. And I'm not threatening you, so please don't distort what I'm saying. I'm protecting the Wikipedia project. That is my sole purpose for this inquiry. I believe your admin practices deserve review, and I believe there is a venue other than ANI or RFC where such complaints are heard. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2007 (UTC)
So what? Alaska was once part of Russia. Some states in the south USA were once not part of the current union, and some were once a part of Mexico. Borders change, and yes Tibetans is a nationality within the PRC. 01:09, 2 August | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
. Finally, an entity is not notable enough for Wikipedia unless it has it's own Wikipedia page? All due respect,that is just bizarre | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
This article seems to be to specific about certain political parties. I think this article should be more about the political philosophy. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
the document links are not working.
195.229.242.54 | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Copied reply to Wikipedia_talk:Article_alerts#AAlertBot. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
YOU ARE ONE SAD LITTLE INDIVIDUAL. | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Sorry to disapoint. I've been reading http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Pisot-VijayaraghavanConstant.html and this stuff is way over my head. I just wanted to find other things to say about 4294967297 besides its being a nonprime Fermat number. I treid to see if maybe it was being some kind of figurate number (besides 4294967297-gonal) without any luck. Then I treid putting it in by itself to sloane lookup and the Pisot seqs were the only results that didn't have to do with it's Fermatness. 22:18, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC) | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Discussion boards are almost the lowest form of life on WP:RS, only just above comments sections on blogs. However if you can demonstrate that GLF has written this (and the fact that it has appeared under his name on a forum that he has moderating rights on may indicate this - although he does not use a ""stared"" account which means it could be an imposter). The Daily Mirror account seems to be totally derivative of the Guardian, and the Guardian does not say that GLF was a member of the BNP - just that their journalist contacted him and he said that he could not be active. The Daily Mirror could well have lost the subtelty of what the Guardian said - I wouldn't like to be their libel lawyer on that!
With all of this, and knowing GLF's propensity to sue I am going to cut this out. The fact that the CDA is to the right of the Conservative Party is pretty well established in the article. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"::It's 632 words as of this moment, so there's a fair amount of room to add details. Two tricks to trim without changing content are: 1) Remove that word ""that"" when you can — a sentence will often read the same without it. 2) Change passive voice to active voice: ""The cat was pick up by John"" > ""John picked up the cat"" saves two words and makes for a more dynamic sentence. Old writers' trick. Ahem, old writers' ""technique.""
" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Intro
This is the intro which was on the Palpatine page for a very long time:
Once an ambitious Senator in the Galactic Senate, the blockade of his homeworld, Naboo, by the Trade Federation, saw him become Chancellor of the Galactic Republic. Palpatine is leader of the Galactic Republic at the time of the Clone Wars, and later is the man who becomes the Emperor. Ultimately, Palpatine is revealed to be the alter ego of Darth Sidious, a Sith Lord of immense power and immeasurable cunning.
yesterday, user Robeykr changed it to this:
Once an ambitious yet unassuming Senator in the Galactic Senate, the blockade of his homeworld, Naboo, by the Trade Federation, saw him become Chancellor of the Galactic Republic shortly before the time of the Clone Wars, and later became absolute leader of the most crushing totalitarian government in the history of the galaxy. Ultimately, it was revealed that Palpatine was the alter ego of Darth Sidious, a Sith Lord of enormous power and considerable cunning.
I changed it back, and tried to clean it up a little:
Once a Senator in the Galactic Senate, the blockade of his homeworld, Naboo, by the Trade Federation, saw him become Chancellor of the Galactic Republic. Palpatine is leader of the Republic during the Clone Wars, and later becomes Galactic Emperor. Ultimately, Palpatine is revealed to be the alter ego of Darth Sidious, a Sith Lord of immense power and immeasurable cunning.
I cited the need for reversion as a) the intro needs to be short b) it should be NPOV
I would like to know what people think about the changes so that hopefully we can resolve this. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
what businessis your one someone elses page. i do recall you and fconway have done this before , so once again it is ok for you to do but no one else., also will you refrain from being a vandal on the martin anderson page. thank you.
anynmous | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Nasib Mukhtarov
17:33, 15 September 2015 (UTC) | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Appreciation
Hi there ACROTERION, from Portugal,
please read | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Clifford Algebra
Hi, I have't forgotten that you wanted to discuss a bit further. I'd like that too. I'm on sort of a semi-Wiki-break right now, but, in the meanwhile, could you elaborate on
By the way, I'm interested in seeing (if you have an example in mind) an illustrative example of leveraging basis elements of a complex space that square to -1. That sounds like an interesting benefit that might normally be passed over in pure math texts.
a bit. I'm not sure exactly what you mean, and there might be no mathematical significance, but there is surely physical significance to be extracted. The complexification is made partly for convenience, partly for the Clifford algebra to actually encompass the physicist convention for the Lie algebra, and partly to encompass transformations that come from , not . Actually, not even the full suffices. In order to encompass time reversal, one must have the set of all antilinear transformations as well. These are constructed using complex conjugation and an ordinary complex linear transformation. Best! | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Donnot merge this page
The single has been comfirmed:
Proof:
([url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ob9KWtc78kA[/url]) | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
I don't think so per the precedent set at ""originality of expression is necessary for copyright protection, and a mere photograph of an out-of-copyright two-dimensional work may not be protected under American copyright law."" [talk] [majestic titan] " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Contested deletion
This page should not be speedy deleted because...
..because it's nominator is a follower of a that is on a crusade to smear this person. Speedily deleting this makes zero sense, as it is a real product released 12 months ago to compete on the cloud front against Amazon EC2. Surely, you understand this. Being in beta doesn't make it any less of a usable product; I merely requested that the GS team share more functionality. If you get an invite, you'll see what I mean. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Wait!
It's back the information never left. I needed that deletion sign put up, for the page is clearly a page on an unimportant person. Therefore it needs to be removed. I'm not a vandal, I just need to know how to put up those deletion signs. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Sammy
I added the referenced fact the bin Laden was known as ""Sammy"" in his youth. I accept that it might seem like vandalism that the arch super villain had a semi-westernised childhood, but this is an encyclopedic fact. I believe my original edit should be reinstated. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Wikipedia_talk:Censorship
A watered-down version of the proposed policy against censorship is now open for voting. Will you knidly review the policy and make your opinions known? Thank you very much.
Flaccid and erect human penis.jpg
Haha... well done for contributing. WP needs people like you to illustrate those articles P | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
OK I got you the first time. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I certainly could. But in February I decided to take a step away from Wikipedia, and I am no longer editing articles on some topics, including politics. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
I was thinking about this last night, and came to two conclusions: First, focusing solely on this article is not the way to go. I need to go back to square one and add academic rigor (if possible) to global warming and denialism. [Don't tell me GW is FA and is therefore academically rigorous; the FA star does not even come within discus-throwing distance of establishing an article as ""academically rigorous.""]. Second, your system of defending this Wikipedia page (notice I didn't say ""article"") is completely airtight, because you hold control over all of the definitions. Join any high school debate team and they'll tell you, if you own the definitions, you own the debate. And the problem here is this: you define anyone who disagrees with AGW as a ""denialist""; and you define everyone who agrees with you as an ""expert."" Done! The page is impregnable. Take forex the quote by Democratic Senator Barbara Boxer. Using her comments as supporting evidence of the page's (not ""article's) thesis is a flagrant act of POV that proves this page (not ""article"") is an op-ed piece from start to end. Barbara Boxer is a politician. Every bit of power, money and prestige she has comes from her ability to do one thing and thing only: to characterize herself as a noble public servant, and stereotype her opponents as villains, buffoons or both. Even more — and this is important — Barabara Boxer is not a run-of-the-mill politician. It would be nearly impossible to find someone more unwaveringly partisan than she is. In short, the Boxer quote is another bit that does not come close to passing the ""so what?"" test. I intend to delete that one sometime soon too. I also wonder whether I should give one of those damn wikicookie templates as a thank-you to the editors who revert me, every time they do so. Or maybe a barnstar? I dunno; some token of gratitude or other. • " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Wikipedia:Today's featured article/May 31, 2015
Gerda was talking with me about the image, so I checked the description, which said: ""the work of the forger Van Meergeren"". If that's true, then it's a 20th-century work, but I don't have any idea whether it's true. - Dank (push to talk) " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
How dare you block me without cause you had no right and are abusing your position. If you don't I will demand your immediate removal as an administrator. Tannim | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Camille Paglia: sex-positive feminist
Here are the supporting links you asked for, you stupid twit!
http://www.lotl.com/content/paglia.htm
http://www.reference.com/browse/wiki/Sex-positive_feminism
If you are too lazy and full of yourself to read them in their entirety then I will just post the relevant sections here:
Camille Paglia: ""On the other hand I’ve been saying in public for five years ago, as someone who’s endorsed prostitutes and strippers and that whole extreme of sex-positive experience, that I’m concerned about the effect on young people – people growing up from 8, 10, 14 in a climate where it’s gone to the opposite direction. I’m already out there concerned about this so I’m really outraged to be stereotyped in that way by her because I am a career teacher and yes, when you have a situation where commercialised sex is being pushed without a true eroticism…I’ve been saying this for years, that we have got to a point of meaningless exhibitionism without real eroticism. I’m for eroticism.""
Camille Paglia is a major American social critic. Paglia's academic writing focuses on the role of vibrant dangerous sexuality in human history. Paglia's key importance to sex-positive feminism is not only her writings on sex, but her advocacy of ""traditional"" values like canon texts. Paglia is somewhat of an intellectual enigma, a conservative and academic feminist, who revels in low and high culture alike and celebrates sexualities disapproved of by mainstream Western culture. Paglia has, in many ways, presented a ""respectable"" face for pro-sex feminism to the world at large." | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
August 2006 (UTC)
I'd go beyond that and strongly suggest inclusion of Figure 1 of that paper in one of these articles, as it clearly shows why the IAU definition is dynamically sound. 14:07, 25 | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
A cup of tea for you!
This is so fun! " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Source everything (i.e., citations for all information). | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I support the move of 'Ade (disambiguation) → Ade' but 'Ade → Ade (disambiguation)' surely can't be right? More accurate would be 'Ade → Ade (drink)'. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"Short for the spanish word ""Cohete"", which means Rocket. Defines an explosive, hyperactive and restless individual.
Born in July 16th 1980, in Guatemala City, Central America." | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Talkback
Blessed be!! Talk " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
This article needs referencing, per WP:CITE. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
On Sea World
Sorry mate, we're working out the kinks in the program. Its currently in V 0.0.6rc3 . Thanks for letting me know! We'll use this information to improve it. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I guess it just depends on how much service he will be doing, but you never know he could get discharged from the army, or end up coming home with post traumatic stress disorder from all the intense stuff he saw in the army. He should come back because he was like a main ingredient until he left. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Not happy
I am not happy with the tone of this comment, ""You seem to be confused"".
Firstly, are you seriously saying that as ""Product Manager, VisualEditor team"" you are completely unable to give a useful answer to a question about what the plans for mathematics rendering are or what progress has been made against those plans? Does mathematics rendering really have nothing whatsoever to do with Visual Editor? Or is there some other reason why you prefer not to answer the question?
Secondly, if you wanted to be helpful, instead of airily alluding to ""the volunteers who maintain that extension"" you might have said who they are. Who are the people to whom, in your opinion, I should address that question, please?
Thirdly, if you really wanted to be helpful, and I am finding it hard to avoid the conclusion that you do not, you might even have volunteered to pass the question on to the approriate people rather than batting it back so unhelpfully.
Once again, if you engage constructively with the volunteer mathematics editor community, it is likely to prove of benefit to the project. So far I'm seeing less of a serious attempt to engage and too much petty point-scoring. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The goal.com article is simply a reprint of the Rund article which you have already suggested three times. I have explained above why it isn't in the article. The fact that she has written a testimonial for the website of a fashion designer she likes is neither noteworthy nor encyclopedic. Again, this is something for her personal website, not an encyclopedia article. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Current source
I'm not sure what you're asking about the op-amp current. - 21:39, August 6, 2005 (UTC) | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
listen up, you narrow-eyed teacher living on minimum wage
you can keep on doing your ""buck buck"" chicken trash talk, or perhaps you might wanna consider moving back to lemuria - the land where your kind of scum roams." | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
A theory is comprised of research findings. You are talking about research findings and theory as if they were two separet things??? There is no distinction between research findings and theory.
What they (first two comments) are telling is that ""the research method"" and ""the theory"" should be split into two articles. ""The research method"" is called ""Social network analysis"", and the theory is called ""Social network theory"". A researcher uses ""Social Network Analysis"" to produce information about a phenomenon called ""Social Network"" and the sum of findings constitute ""Social network theory"".
Therefore there is no distinction between ""theory"" and ""research findings"". But there should be a distinction between ""a sepecific research method"" and ""a theory"".
Thus, the article whould be split into two articles as ""Social network"" and ""Social network analysis"".
76.31.236.91 " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
It doesn't matter what I think. I'm a big retarded antisemite. I'm-a go throw myself in front of an sixteen-wheeler with the grill covered in razor wire and video-tape it for you. People will find the lone tripod on the side of the road, see the video, think it's lulzy, then put it on YouTube for posterity. | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Apollo 13 (film) request for editing
Could you edit the Apollo 13 film article and crop the photos of the cast, tom hanks, bill paxton, and kevin bacon. thanks. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
You should familiarize yourself with the situation before blocking editors.
Under Wikipedia policy, under the 3RR rule, it states that leeway will be given to editors whose reverts undo vandalism and/or help improve the article. There is a solution to the edit warring that has been accepted by most editors. That is to leave the 3rd paragraph of the lede as is until objections/suggestions for improvements are proposed and approved by peers before edits are made to it, which is also according to Wikipedia guidelines for resolving conflict resolution. If you familiarize yourself with this from the Talk page, you'll observe that this is a case where certain editors continually make changes without discussion, without explanation, without stating their objections first, without submitting their proposed changes to peer review, and in direct defiance of the express will of most editors that this be done to resolve the warring. I am enforcing that majority will and implementing that solution, because despite my repeated requests for moderation and intervention from administrators, I have received absolutely no help to get this taken care of. If you would kindly just enforce policy and help the majority of editors to implement the agreed-upon solution by blocking those who continually edit the article while being completely unwilling to follow policy guidelines and make a reasonable effort to seek peer approval for changes. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I'm fed up with all this and the people here. The community here is dying and now I will now indefinitely and probably forever take my place amongst those who have also withdrawn from this project on similar principles, it is nothing but needless stress and over-consumption of time | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I can accept that the picture is not a good one, but claiming that the photo should be removed because it includes a swastika - the Finnish military insignia of the time, not the Nazi symbol (which by the way is inverted, rotated and another color...and adopted two years later than the Finnish symbol) is IMHO absurd. I suggest that you read this - it might be enlightning. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Sshhh, don't tell them about Vitamin K. One way of doing it. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Wel,l here it is Verbal. The 2005-20006 Annual Report of the Prince's School of Traditional Arts. Here is the link [] | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.