text
stringlengths 0
4.07k
| labels
sequence | encoded_labels
sequence | lang
stringclasses 1
value | has_toxic
int64 0
1
| has_profane
int64 0
1
| has_insult
int64 0
1
| has_hate
int64 0
1
| has_threat
int64 0
1
| has_sexual
int64 0
1
| has_offensive
int64 0
1
| has_selfharm
int64 0
1
| has_harassment
int64 0
1
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lt. Govenor Jefferson Keel
Also, I have information from personal interviews and pictures of the Lt. Governor? How should I go about this?24.116.196.18 | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Case not closed. You didn't answer my question which was whether the two sentences mean the same thing. They'd have to for you to be right. Of they don't and of course you're not. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The appearance seems to depend both on the browser and the window size and I've been fiddling with the image placement to try to balance them. I don't like the block quote template as it doesn't seem to do anything and I prefer quotes of this sort to stand out typographically, in some way. The quote in this case seems to have a Dickensian sound to it, which provides a sense of the period. I'm hoping that the readership will like it but critics abound, alas. Anyway, thanks for your input. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I'll let you do your thing. Too many cooks ruin stew and all that. - | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
This is super trivial, more a clarification. I chopped out the explicit mention of the BBC and dequoted, since it would be clear from the reference, in order to perform a minor space-saver. Either way, the 'weasel words' are still present, only now quoted and the source cited in the text. Is that standard in Wikipedia, as your edit comment suggested, when weasels 'cannot' be avoided? Best etc. ~ | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"Myanmar==
I want to lodge a formal complaint against PATS1 for targeting my posts on the myanmar page for deletion because they oppose the military rule of myanmar. I think it is important for wikipedia to allow ""the peoples encyc."" to be used to raise awareness of this critical issue.
==" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
SORRY, heres deletion log... ""Klement's Sausage Company"" Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Klement's Sausage Company. Malamute5
Thank you for the reference. The answer is on the page - the overwhelming opinion of the contributors was delete, which was carried out in accordance with due process. Any administrator could have done it, I just happened to be the one. You might want to direct your comments to , who appears to think that this company may pass WP:CORP criteria. This correspondance is now closed. (aeropagitica) (talk) " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
It was Raul's idea, but we all thought you deserved special mention -) You've really done a fine job, and reading your articles makes one proud. (Talk) " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Re: Re:Invader Spleen
I looked at Invader Zim and it said you put the IZFas on the page! | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
" This is untrue. I have not been blocked for the reasons mentioned but rather for entirely different reasons, since the reasons mentioned are not actually true. It is impossible to ""exhibit a battleground attitude"" because of many reasons, including the fact that one cannot ""exhibit"" something unless one is a display engineer at a museum, and it would therefore be impossible to ""exhibit"" anything let alone a ""battleground attitude,"" the fact that there is no such thing as a ""battleground attitude,"" the fact that there is no such thing as an ""attitude"" in regards to how a human being acts, and the fact that the word ""exhibit"" is used in an incorrect manner here done solely for the purpose of antagonizing the user (antagonizing me). Usage of words like ""exhibit"" and ""attitude"", and refusing to follow the section title requirements on my page, show an obvious malfeasance intent by the above person, and therefore the block cannot be valid because within the first sentence he has already seriously demonstrated his lack of appropriate intent by specifically and purposefully being antagonizing. The second claim is physically possible, but is blatantly false. I have specifically attempted to PREVENT other users from refusing to communicate in a appropriate manner, as he was repeatedly replying to the same conversation in several different locations, for which I reported him but yet the people at the ALLEGED ""help desk"" refused to tell me where to report him, and even deleted several of my replies and then archived it fraudulently. Having OTHER USERS delete my comments, participate in blatant fradulent..ism, post the same thing on multiple talk pages at once for the purpose of harassing me, etc., is hardly ""myself making it difficult to communicate,"" when in fact as was just demonstrated I did the LITERAL EXACT OPPOSITE of this by LITERALLY ATTEMPTING TO PREVENT OTHER USERS FROM MAKING IT DIFFICULT TO COMMUNICATE. ((In addition, if I wish for other users to NOT communicate with me, I also have THAT right, it is in fact | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
specifically written into law in every state in the country and will get you arrested if you fail to do so. Although I personally disagree with this law and it is an immoral law which deems to prevent for example ex-spouses from communicating with each other when necessary, the part of the law that refers to STRANGERS such as on Wikipedia or anywhere on the Internet, it is a PERSONAL CHOICE whether you wish other strangers on the site to communicate with you or not and/or post contact information etc. That is why every message board in existence has an option to ""disable the private messaging system"".)) There were no personal attacks done by me anywhere, so this part is a baseless and fraudulent claim. ""Refusal to abide by the site's guidelines"" is impossible since 1) ""guidelines"" and ""rules"" are two different thing 2) Wikipedia does not have any rules and 3) All policies of any kind are subject to debate and protest at any time according to the numerous Wikipedia articles which specifically say this. You have also demonstrated more incorrect intent by saying that something was ""done in multiple venues,"" even though no venues of any kind exist because this is a website rather then a collection of several different building which show concerts or other entertainment events and/or conventions and/or etc. So that is also impossible. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Don't tell me what I can and can't do and don't be rude. I will include it per Wikipedia guidlines, which are nothing to do with you. I do not chose how they do, I meerly change the charts per guidlines. The formats are both allowed, but not to be reverted after somebody's hard work. Don't also tell me to get my facts right, get yours right, certifications are NOT automatic. You have been reported and will be blocked soon. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Thanks for your efforts in trying to resolve this matter. I will respond to all these matters. I am just a little hard pressed for time at the moment. I might have to wait until the weekend when I have plenty of time to think about my stupid actions and to express in full detail my remorse to this matter. Once again Thankyou | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
JESUS CHIRST HELP ME I GOT BLOCKED!!!!!!!!!!!! | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
What do I ought to know?
Yes, I'm an angel. . But what do I ought to know? O_o | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"|1=129.234.157.91|2=Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by """". The reason given for Tango's block is: ""Personal attacks or harassment"".|3=Coren|4=1310028" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Do NOT vandalize on pages, like you did to Lake Sammamish State Park. Consider this your final warning. 98.111.75.8 | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Effects under £3000 - dated 3rd June (with one codicil) of Charlotte Dorothea Forster Grierson, formerly of the city of Dublin, afterwards residing at four Clarmont Bank, Shrewsbury, England & late of Carlile-terrace, Malahide, County Dublin, Ireland, Spinster deceased who died 6th March, 1869 at Carlile-terrace, aforesaid was proved at the Principal Registry by the oath of George Abraham Grierson, of Manor House, Malahide, aforesaid Esquire, the sole executor, | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Type 3 looks gorgeous ) (talk) | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Silk
Curiously, I can't seem to find any direct evidence that says whether their tea bags / infusers are made of actual silk. There are many careful uses of the word ""silken"", though. Can anyone verify this one way or the other?" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Whoever put a notices on my page. I will kill u | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
0,
0,
0,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Not sure if this is how this is done... | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
. I also thought it was strategically sensible to refer to the claims in context to avoid their being repeatedly added as facts by people who have read the websites | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Forget it. If inaccuracy is what wikipedia aims for, then go ahead and leave it unchanged. But just for the sake of properly informing people, look at this: http://www.wrestlingnewsarena.com/2009/06/breaking-news-top-raw-superstar-injured/ Put that in the cite | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"SAIL LABS Technology==
Could you please tell me why you deleted this entire page? It was up as a short stump after it was recently added to the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_ICT_Prize winners... I just wanted to start the page, although an employee of the company in hope that others would finish it (but an hour on a saturday morning seems a bit short to do that). I do not want to write too much on SAIL as there is a conflict of interest, but I think winning the European innovation prize (""like the nobel prize for IT"" quote from derstandard an Austrian newspaper) I think this company deserves an article...
==" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Public Address 3: How to remember imp days & events (by Mishra ji with real life examples) | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Helpme is not to be used in cases like this. I suggest you be patient, email the blocking admin and explain the situation. You might need a thorough explanation. Also, you have removed the image from your signature right? | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
""circular"" as well as the counter arguments. Defending S-C is risen to the level of religion. It's not only circular, it's vertigo. 78.0.128.72 " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
""Krauss plans to update The Physics of Star Trek in 2006.""
I think this article needs to get updated..." | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Yes, I concur most wholeheartedly!! I know there was once a massive northerly-southerly seaway west of the Rockies but I forgot the name, and now I'm having trouble finding it again. Where's Geologic history of North America?? | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Thanks ) • You Da One " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Get off your high horse, or block me. | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Latin America also includes Brazil, that had an diferent social system then that of Hispanic America.The title of this section is wrong. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
OK, after some further research, Mawdsley turns out to be incorrect. Please see this and this—both sources agree with the book I used and put the date at April 13. I would appreciate it if you reverted to my version and incorporated non-contradicting bits from Mawdsley into it. Cheers,— • (yo?); | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Very long
Today I restored the template:verylong on this page, as its length is getting a little bit out of hand. The ""Acute toxic/dangerous effects"" section alone is 17500 characters long, without any subsections, and the total article length is over 76k. It and the intro are getting a little too lengthy to be a quick encyclopedia-style read. See the manual of style and either deal with the situation or discuss before removing the template. Here's the relevant section of the manual: Wikipedia:Article size. talk " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
William L. Walsh
Hello Lemurbaby.
There has been no recent improvements to the William L. Walsh article for GA status. Possibly this article needs to be withdrawn from the Good Article nominations page, unless, recommendations have been addressed. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
You dont see the alien face above the Chlorine atom? It still there | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Your continual removal and attempt at hiding said removal of specific references on the page that properly attribute the author, title, and publication date of works, in accordance with with standard academic practices and Wikipedia policy, is in fact tendentious. Clearly an agenda. It's frankly remarkable to me that not one of the reviewers (or friends of your Talk Page) that you summoned to this page has dared to comment on this abomination. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. ( t, c, @, ) | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
As you kinow it yourself you are not elligible nor credible nor a reliable source of neutrality in this case as you are yourself a mormon and all you do is to support other mormons, without following any wikipedias rules, but your own churchs solidarity.
I dont believe that any of you has even the intention of being straightfo9rward with non mormon or to be a little bit honest, but that the alone thing that activate you is your own religious believe and the pedantisme to think that all you may say or do is auto righteous in the name of the church and all the illusions you dream of with open eyes.
I dont want a mormon admi I dont want a mmormon admi I dont want a mormon admi to look into this case but an exterm¨n al one with no relations nor conacts what so ever with this church nor its representants or members.
If you cant do that, must be because your circle of admi friends is around the church, or because you know very deeply that all you did was deeply unappropriate and wont stand a micro mile in a wiki trail.
I am mad, very mad at you, also because you ignore what I have say, so why should I care about your saying and doing if we have to be neutraly equal?
Any idea?
I want the text who was deleeted from the archive, it is unacceptable that a text is deleeted from archive and from the edit history, just one hour after it was reverted and less than a day after it was written, without any previous warning of any kind about it.
This is all about wiki rules and you have broken them all. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Curse You, Daniel Case!
Why didn't you accept? Now my only hope is for the Wikipedia Unblocking/Blocking team to unblock me. I NEED AN ACCOUNT NOW. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The article needed expansion somehow. The Vales case, which caused a huge public outcry and about which tens and tens of newspaper articles and thousands of talkbacks were written, is definitely noteworthy. If it does not belong here, it should get its own article. I propose leaving it here and adding other materials also. And it is not a negative thing, it is completely positive. I, for one, think the Edah was much too lax. The protests should have been much stronger. Call me a kanoi, I guess I am. Please add more information instead of removing the information present. The article needs to be expanded somehow. It's shameful that we only have so little information on it here. | (talk) | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I was wondering how do i make one of those little content boces? | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Daily Mirror version Hillsborough insults added to Wikipedia pages using GOVERNMENT computers.— talk | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
There is a note if you click on it. The line might need clean up but it is obvious what the intent of the line is. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
". Naturally I was angry, so made a file to ANI. However, I archived the ANI soon by suggestion, and have no wish to talk with him furthur. However, this block is not only based on the blocking admin's own bias and very punitive after 8 hours past from the incident. How does giving him a warning become ""wikistalking?"" He assumed that I did not read his warning, and did not like my defiance. I asked him ""who are them""? Then, I immediately got blocked. So I'm requesting for unblock. With the dreadful experience, I get that I'm distrusted by admins even though Roux poured personal attacks. I will only ""contribute"" content building if I'm unblocked. Thanks.}}Caspian blue
" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
This is futile as I mentioned. There are multiple sources confirming Ali's apostasy from Islam. Can you demonstrate that Warraq is not trustworthy? (talk•contribs) | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Thanks
Thank you for reverting vandalism off my userpage. It was very much appreciated D talk " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
" July 2006 (UTC)
Well, yes, that's fine, but the point here is that there is no publisher's statement made about anything in that sentence. The idea behind having a resource is that we copy what the resource says instead of just listing them as a reference. If the resource says, ""Joe at worms"" then we write ""Joe ate worms"". About tarnishing any reputation, that isn't the point at all. And about accepted practices in the publishing world, this is Wikipedia and the accepted practices are covered by what we call ""policy and ""guidelines"" since those came about over a long period of time and through the process of consensus. About people keeping records of how many books were published, I think you missed the point there. Publisher's Weekly magazine has a statement about the number of books among other things for example. They are a secondary source. Do you see how that's different? About the article on FIP, it hadn't any sources at all which is one of the reasons it was deleted. The only references which it had on the bottom were ""See Also"" references that pointed to this article here, and other articles which were also unsourced except for pointing to this article here. FIP and ACIM.ORG are the same entity. FACIM is also the same entity. This is known. Having the same board of directors, as well as sharing the same registered trademark ""ACIM®"" , etc., makes anything from either of those web sites primary sources. 20:51, 8" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Tim, there is no consistency on this point, although of course there should be. I think you might be able to get some useful discussion going either at the Biography project talk page or at Wikipedia:UK Wikipedians' notice board. Let me know if you make progress. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Barcelona football seasons (early 20th century)
I looked at the Barcelona football seasons for which you added (and some other seasons after). They could do with , really. (I don't think it's worth listing at WP:PNT, but this should put them in view of one way or another, or if not that could be added to their talk pages). I don't want to do it myself (a) because I am lazy and (b) because I know nothing about football and would probably make translation mistakes. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fuck you faggot, I don't care if i get blocked, as long as everyone knows you are a dumb cunt. | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
1,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
answering questions
I won't have a chance to say hello or goodbye when I'm blocked/banned/whatever. So, ""Hello; I'm not holding my breath on anyone addressing your questions concerning Dawn Well's page on Wiki; and I better get in a good-bye, as I feel I have the lifespan of a May fly in a low ceilinged room full of bullfrogs; not because I’m wrong, but because anyone on your side of the issue is going to be attacked and baited into some infraction, an infraction ignored by someone they like, but an infraction that will be worthy of execution when committed by me.”" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Issues
Onefortyone, the reason why I removed your edits, because they have following problems:-
It is Graceland that is 2nd most visited place in the USA., , , Not Biltmore Estate.
""The décor throughout the house has often been criticized"" is incorrect, it has not been criticized by anyone. Then you put up the quotes of Albert Goldman, a fringe theorist on Elvis Presley, and added them under Graceland#Basement, which is irrelevant.
Those ""conflicting reports"" about his death have no relevance on this article, especially when they are disputed or rejected enough times.
This is why this kind of content misleads and should be removed. I don't see any consensus for adding it on archives or previous discussion either. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
In that case would ""new age"" at least be acceptable? _friend " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Mr. Wolf,
We need to have a serious talk about Asthma. Have you done any reading about ASTHMA? The Beta Adrenergic Theory is the ONLY Theory of Asthma that can be associated with one name {not including crackpots} so your question about other names insults my intelligence!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Not only that but in contrast to other theories this one has been cited more than any other article in the history of the Journal of Allergy according to the GARFIELED LIBRARY at The University of Pennsylvania.
Last but not least, my comment would be out of place in the history section because it relates DIRECTLY to the BA2 polymorphism. Since other polymorphisms CANNOT be related to a specific theory, much less to a specific individual, your comment doesn't make any sense. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"Please note that DPeterson has now starting accusing me of vandalism for editing this very page Advocates for Children in Therapy. I chose to edit by asking for citations for the ""facts"" he published on the page. How can that be vandalism? It seems he can run roughshod over Wiki policy and guidelines, but any reasonable attempt to make him justify it is ""vandalism"".
" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bald Eagle
I've addressed all your points so far. Cheers, Jude. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
SARAH
You deleted it, but it remains. I emailed oversight hours ago. They just replied saying thanks and the team has suppressed the information. It remains. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Rand Paul
Are you monitoring Rand Paul? If not, you might remove the template from the talk page. Thanks. – | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Poor AFD rationales
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe E. Newsome High School
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wallpaper review
See | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Fair use rationale for images challenged on Vic McGlynn article
Betacommand bot put a challenge on the Vic McGlynn article. These are low resoultion captures from the in-studio webcam at BBC 6 Music. I then edited the photo and made a new one and uploaded it. The image in question is ""Image:VicMc3.jpg"" . It is fair use. Please advise. Thanks. - (Bob) " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
example of oldest Prosthethics
Like the roman capua leg or egyptian prosthetics? | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Sorry, I do not see how any of what you removed is anti-semitic. You're going to have to justify a charge like that. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Cavorting with Heretics
Fuck Heretics!!! | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Ha!
There wasn't a BLP violation in the comments you oversited. I didn't call anyone anything. Your abuse of admin tools is pathetic and cowardly. Funny how I talk about fascists controlling the Gamergate article and you completely delete it from the history. You just proved my point. The one thing I DID do was link to the supposed death threat that Brianna Wu was peddling to the media, which proved it was a complete fiction. That's the problem you have - you don't want your anti-Gamergate lies being exposed. | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
thanks
thanks but i know | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Keep your propaganda away from this article. You are just another internet troll. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Speedy deletion declined: Skull Prince
Hello Swimnteach. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Skull Prince, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Is fictional, A7 doesn't apply. I might delete it as spam. . Thank you. UK " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Evan Rachel Wood
Is there any evidence that she is jewish? | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
People, we are desperately in need of some consensus here. Can we all please vote for one of the following options. Given that there are three options, I think a 51% plurality would suffice. Some of the options have subordinate polls: please vote again in each of these subpolls | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fan Related Links
Hello all. I know some of you may have found my additions irritating on this site: more specifically my linking a youtube clip of my friend on the news giving his fresh impressions of the movie, just after viewing it.
Let me just say that my friend is a very dedicated fan, which the news clip even attests to, and although his comments might seem a bit unusual, I think they're interesting in that they speak unique ways a fan could view a movie.
As far as copyright infringement or irrelevance, I've already addressed how the clip is relevant, so I'll say what I have to on IP. Having worked in an intellectual property firm for a few years, and now as a student in law school, I am convinced from what I know of the law that this clip does not infringe upon any rights of the film, and any infringement that has occurred thus far from it has been attended to by the ABC news team for the release of their story. So, please, can we try to negotiate or come to some sort of agreement that it will be okay to leave this clip up? I'm new to wiki-editing, but believe this clip would make a nice addition to the Spider-Man 3 site. I'm sure lots of fans would find it funny and interesting, to say the least. So what do you say, people? | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Vindictive
My sense of honor is wounded by your spiteful regard. Let's us hope for comity to return. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
}}
{{WikiProject New Zealand
|class=C
|importance=low
|politics=yes
|politics-importance=low | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Edit: In 1991, Canwest issued a successful initial public offering on the Toronto Stock Exchange, included multi voting shares
If CNN had multi voting shares, would it not be an essential fact? | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
No assuming things either using the synthesis rule like a=b=c kind of stuff. No where it's used. How you came to the conclusion that it was used. It was NOT. Even though there can be ways in which it can be used for generalization and to equate, it has NOT been used in Wikipedia by me, just because it's not valid here. Now stop the accusations. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Speedy deletion of Creator of school
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Creator of school, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
One of the things on my wishlist is to automatically create maps and title coordinates using the ""lat"" and ""long"" fields in the French infobox. But that's for later. BTW once you've added an infobox you need to check the links in it, for instance in the Saint-Pierre-d'Entremont the link to the arrondissement is broken (just fixed it). That takes time, so I'll finish the stubs first. Actually, what I do is add the ones others have missed. Talk " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I'm not going to put up with bigotry and intellectual dishonesty if I have any say | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
getting your priorities right
I don't like the idea of using any kind of food with my mastrabating....I just feel like I am using food to have fun while so many other people around the world are starving...I just don't think it's a very moral thing to do. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
discuss don't blank
what is your major malfunction? can't you discuss edits before blanking them? that is your POV that gadaffi is irrelevant and a joke. you do absolutely no service to your people by acting like this.. in fact you have quickly given me the impression turks have something to hide... | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The Nextgen Recon Commandos are picked for a smaller squad in 2 or 3 so that they are stealthy, unnoticed, they are the only ones that can do the most dangerous and any missions. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
DRV of Zaydra Pena
Please revert your revision of closing that DRV. I still have a few more comments. And, your closing speech was a bit odd. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I don't mean to be a downer -( BTW, I stole your username template. It looks great! | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Hey, you freaking hermaphrodite.
Please unprotect your user page; I would like to move it to a more suitable title or three. | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
0,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Oh hear me go someone removes all my pages i get angry and put down even more for beuing upset Use your common sense you little hitler he rem,oved every one of my links and i am supposed to be kind to him why? What about his uuncivial nature. Why dio none of you have any understanding. He goes on my pages onsults my work, supports a deletetion of all my pages orbpablry did them, and i am supposed to be kind to him. I did not swear at him,. ai am argoibng back. You are not the police. I have right to be angry back. i have not sworn, alittle hitler is not a swear word it refers to petty law enforcers such as park attendetns or traffic wardens who go after people with a vindictive smugness with no sympathy | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Back atcha
And thanks to you too! Cheers, (talk) | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Yup. I wonder as well. I also hope that soon the coroner's report is released, and ""all hell breaks loose,"" so we can all finally get to work on fixing this thing with some reliable information. Just me. Your mileage may vary. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
""the best solution is to keep reverting him"" 8 July 2005 23:15 (UTC)" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Foto
Foto states: Carpatho-Rusyn sub-groups - Transcarpathian Rusyns in original goral folk-costumes from Maramureş. Photo: Village Mokre near Sanok (Poland). 2007. But why do they wear trousers sharovary of Ukranian Cossack?? | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The multitude of sources simply cannot be ignored. There are several articles stating the environmental impact. I will actually expand the section in the article because the monument is so big, people should know as a part of an encyclopedia the river bed violations. I would disagree with the arguments given above and that the edit should have more expansion within the article as a half dozen citations stating there are environmental issues. Also there is a persistent conflict of interest from the users above but from their follow-ups, there intentions will be clear. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
What do you mean? I think we should stick to what sources say. Have more sources been uncovered which portray the subject as anything other than a criminal? Or have the rules changed so that BLPs should no longer reflect what sources say? | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"I like how if someone posts factual information that is not in step with you personal politics it gets branded an ""edit war""
" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
REDIRECT Talk:John Sadler (town clerk) | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
This is your Dad sam
I'm worried about you.
Worried that your cock wont fit in my ass anymore!, OMFK LOLZ HAHA I SAID PEEENIS GORF GORF GORF GORF | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
In the words of Rodney King, ""Can't we all just get along?"" " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Can someone explain criticism #6 to me?
This is taken from the criticisms section of the article:
6. Since logic is inherently constant, and that some things are more true than others, it means that ""strong"" relativism cannot hold true under many conditions. Relativism often ignores how views have different weight to another. An example of a similar phenomenon is the Gay Marriage debate in the U.S. - an example where the majority dictates the rights of the entirety even when it doesn't apply to them, as they do not weigh up the effects of their views.
Can someone explain what exactly this means?
I do not follow the first half of the paragraph (the one that actually pertains to relativism), and the example reads as complete nonsense to me, especially this part:
""...the majority dictates the rights of the entirety even when it doesn't apply to them, as they do not weigh up the effects of their views.""
I do not think that:
a) The majority in question believes that ""it"" doesn't apply to them. (Though I'm not sure what ""it"" is in this context, so the sentence may be true.) The majority believes that allowing gay marriage would undermine the moral standards of their society, which, of course, applies to everybody in that society.
b) The majority in question does not ""weigh up the effects of its views"". Its views are that gay marriage should not be allowed, for the benefit of society; it is aware of the effects; and does not object to them. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
If you want Category:Turkish people for Turkish people (ethnicity, a branch of Turkic peoples) and create category with other name for citizens of the Republic of Turkey (including non-Turkic ethnic groups), I can support you. Thank you. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Mandarin is the Chinese word for Bureaucrat which term is prefered because Bureaucrat has aquired a negative connotation due to the general lack of integrity the people that are getting such jobs tend to have because their positions and roles tend to be kept secret from the general public. An encyclopedia is a source of interesting and important information. It makes no sense what you are saying. Putting an article that contains a list of top bureaucrats in a system of government together and some information about their qualifications and job history that got them the job is not making a Bio, it's not POV, and is not publishing a Directory. Each of the reasons given are not valid and patently false. Furtermore the information would be linked and made part of the Job Stub so people can know what types of jobs they are. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Your edit summary wasn't very nice either. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | en | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.