task_id int32 18 100 | area stringclasses 6
values | prompt stringclasses 6
values | golden_answer stringclasses 6
values | associated_rubrics int32 29 43 | rubrics listlengths 29 43 | task_details stringclasses 6
values | reference_materials stringclasses 6
values | realistic_explanation stringclasses 6
values | difficulty_explanation stringclasses 6
values | peer_review_1_overall_quality_label stringclasses 2
values | peer_review_1_overall_quality_description stringclasses 6
values | peer_review_1_representativeness_label stringclasses 3
values | peer_review_1_difficulty_label stringclasses 3
values | peer_review_1_difficulty_description stringclasses 6
values | peer_review_1_task_specification_quality_label stringclasses 2
values | peer_review_2_overall_quality_label stringclasses 2
values | peer_review_2_overall_quality_description stringclasses 6
values | peer_review_2_representativeness_label stringclasses 3
values | peer_review_2_difficulty_label stringclasses 3
values | peer_review_2_difficulty_description stringclasses 6
values | peer_review_2_task_specification_quality_label stringclasses 1
value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
93 | Corporate & M&A | You are a corporate lawyer in England and Wales. An England and Wales incorporated private limited company requires assistance as follows: The Client has one majority shareholder (75% holding), and 3 other investors, all party to a shareholders agreement. One investor (10% shareholder, not a director or employee) has b... | **Background**
We have been asked to set out some advice to the founder of a company incorporated in England and Wales (the "**Company**"). We understand that the Company has one majority shareholder (the "**Founder**") holding 75% fully paid up shares (same class as all shareholders) and three minority investors, all ... | 30 | [
{
"rubric_category": "Structure & Style Rubric",
"score_option": 5,
"criterion": "Does the answer use defined terms consistently throughout?",
"justification": "Legal outputs should match legal documentation style and consistent use of defined terms is an important marker of professionalism and lega... | Share buybacks are nuanced because there is a legal process in the UK, but sometimes the commercial realities are rather nuanced. Often corporate lawyers deal with shareholder breaches and company disputes. However this hinges on the lawyers and the finance professional working together to understand the financial and ... | https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents | This is a common scenario - breaching SH, company wanting to act but the financials creating a barrier. | I think lawyers and I suspect perhaps AI may get a bit lost with the right path forward. The numbers may need changing - the point is that it might not be possible to do the share buyback, so perhaps it falls on the Founder to somehow do this (which again is not so straightforward). The AI might force a solution, but t... | 4 - Above Standards | I would suggesting including options that are unattractive (for completeness) and also those that won't work (to show they have been considered).
More descriptive subheadings would assist with rapid absorption of the information | 5 - Core Activity | 5 - Very Hard | Requires consideration of:
- unfair prejudice - vague and nebulous claim to bring
- buybacks - fiddly, multiple options, funding
- purchase by founder:
- impact on other shareholders
- funding
- distributions
- directors duties | Well-Specified | 4 - Above Standards | The memo is drafted professionally and the advice provided were clear, concise, and most importantlly commercially smart and viable. This is usually very appreciated by clients who are looking for legal solutions that will also make the most sense to them commercially after evaluating the circumstances and challenges a... | 4 - Typical | 3 - Moderate | The complexity of this case is less in the law, but slightly more on the accounting side of the shares arrangement and calculation. The legal provisions and analysis are relatively straightforward. | Well-Specified |
68 | Commercial Litigation | You are an associate attorney at a large law firm, who has been assigned to a new matter involving a contractual dispute between two AI companies. You represent Brightmind AI ("Brightmind"), who is the defendant in a civil litigation matter brought by plaintiff Orion AI ("Orion"). The two companies previously entered i... | **I. Introduction**
This memorandum discusses the legal issues raised by the document subpoenas our client, Brightmind AI ("Brightmind") has issued to third parties XYZ, Inc. ("XYZ") and ABC AI ("ABC") in the _Orion v. Brightmind _litigation matter.
As you know, XYZ is an IT vendor used by plaintiff Orion AI ("Orion"... | 34 | [
{
"rubric_category": "Structure & Style Rubric",
"score_option": 3,
"criterion": "Is the response organized into clearly labeled, distinct sections?",
"justification": "Effective legal writing should be organized into distinct sections, with each separate legal issue being analyzed separately."
},... | In general, a third party not directly involved in litigation has no duty to _preserve_ relevant evidence; rather, their obligation only extends to producing such documents when in receipt of a subpoena under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45. However, there are certain elements which can create such an obligation, su... | <https://www.wcslaw.com/accolades/does-a-third-party-have-a-duty-to-preserve-esi/>
<https://www.butlersnow.com/news-and-events/wait-why-am-i-receiving-this-practice-pointers-on-third-party-responses-to-litigation-preservation-demands>
<https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=a00248bb-0651-4bc1-b8eb-c3b6113a846... | This is a very realistic task - in large-scale civil litigation matters, parties often must issue document subpoenas to third parties under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45. This prompt puts a bit of a different spin on the issue, as it involves a party first sending an initial _preservation notice_ to the third part... | I would say this is somewhat tricky - the issue of third party _preservation _obligations (as opposed to production obligations pursuant to a subpoena) is somewhat uncommon. I am introducing two different third parties in this prompt, each with different relationships to the defendant, and each with a different set of ... | 4 - Above Standards | This is a realistic litigation discovery scenario involving subpoenas, non-party discovery obligations, preservation duties, and proportionality. The prompt mirrors the type of analytical work a lawyer would perform when evaluating subpoena strategy. | 4 - Typical | 3 - Moderate | This prompt requires good legal judgment and familiarity with civil discovery rules, but it does not require particularly deep or novel legal research. A mid-level or junior litigation attorney could complete it without a lot of difficulty | Well-Specified | 5 - Exemplary | Very well written professional work. I enjoyed reading it. | 5 - Core Activity | 4 - Hard | Requires deep expertise on the subject. | Well-Specified |
100 | Contract Law | You are the General Counsel of Acme Corporation, a non-profit organization based in Northern Virginia, with annual revenue of Five Million Dollars. Your organization is recognized by the Internal Revenue Service as a 501(c)(3) tax exempt organization.
The Board of Directors has told you that the current CEO is retirin... | To: Board of Directors
From: General Counsel
Date: February 27, 2026
Subject: Draft Employment Agreement; Potential Legal Issues with Proposed Agreement
**A. Introduction: **
You have asked for a draft employment agreement for the hiring of the new CEO. That draft is attached.
You have also asked for this memo ident... | 29 | [
{
"rubric_category": "Structure & Style Rubric",
"score_option": 5,
"criterion": "Does the memo to the Board include identification of key issues, analysis of those issues, citation of sources, and assumptions made?",
"justification": null
},
{
"rubric_category": "Structure & Style Rubric",
... | I tried to create a prompt that would test the model's ability to identify and address legal issues that were not obvious from the prompt; here, that issue is the IRS restriction on excessive compensation for the executives of tax exempt organizations. I wanted to see if the model would identify that issue, including t... | The primary source is IRC § 4958, and the "safe harbor" provisions of the IRS regulations promulgated thereunder. | I would say a 4, as it is a very real issue facing tax exempt organizations, with serious consequences for the directors that approve compensation deemed excessive. | It's a 4, not so much for the drafting itself, but because of the issues that must be identified and incorporated into that drafting. | 4 - Above Standards | This is a competent, thoughtful first-draft work that a Board could act on with clarifications, but falls short of elite GC standards due to client-accessibility tweaks, deeper explanations/proposals on open terms, stronger risk wording, and minor factual/drafting cleanups. | 4 - Typical | 3 - Moderate | The task requires integrating specialized knowledge across three distinct areas—nonprofit tax compliance, Virginia employment/non-compete law, and executive contract drafting. | Well-Specified | 5 - Exemplary | It succeeds by forcing the model to solve a "Double Trap" involving federal tax law and state employment rules. The prompt places the writer in a high-stakes role as General Counsel. The respondent must warn the Board of personal financial risks under IRS Section 4958.
The Gold Answer provides a clear summary of these ... | 5 - Core Activity | 5 - Very Hard | It requires deep knowledge in two separate areas of law. A writer must navigate the IRS "safe harbor" rules while also applying Virginia’s strict three-part test for non-compete clauses.
The task is hard because it sets a trap. The Board wants a five-year, three-country ban. In Virginia, this is legally void. To pass, ... | Well-Specified |
18 | Employment & Labor | A senior marketing manager, Sarah, is employed by a multinational company based in London. Following her maternity leave, she requested hybrid working (working from home/remotely three days a week). The employer rejected her request on the basis of ‘team cohesion’ and the need for teams to work together in person. Howe... | **Legal Memorandum**
To: Sarah (Client)
**Subject: Legal Analysis of Employment Dispute Claim **
[ ] **1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY**
Based on the facts provided, Sarah will have strong grounds to pursue her claims against her former employer in the Employment Tribunal. Her strongest claims lie in the indirect sex and pregna... | 34 | [
{
"rubric_category": "Structure & Style Rubric",
"score_option": 3,
"criterion": "Readability - is the text in the memo drafted with line spacings and paragraphs (no more than 3-4 sentences per paragraph) to ensure the overall structure is not too clunky/wordy?",
"justification": "This is to ensure ... | There are various key statutes or legal remedies available – but it’s key to actually understand the nuances and differences between the different legal frameworks, and more importantly to incorporate the newly enacted Employment Rights Act 2025 which will expand employment rights in phases during 2026-2027. It will be... | Responses may reference the following sources to ground legal and regulatory claims.
Equality Act 2010
Employment Rights Act 1996
Employment Rights Act 2025 | This is quite a common situation that lawyers will have to deal when supporting or providing initial legal advice to propsective clients. Furthermore, such a case on flexible working request has also became quite a common work arrangement provided to employees since the covid-19 pandemic. | The task requires synthesizing multipl legal frameworks and timelines before and applying them to Sarah's case. It involves multi-hop reasoning, judgment about the strength of evidence and prospects for Sarah, and the ability to communicate uncertainty clearly to a non-technical audience. | 3 - Meets Minimum Standards | There are so many grammatical errors in the prompt, the response and in the rubric. The writing and legal explanations are correct but could be worded much better to provide more clear answers and requests. | 4 - Typical | 3 - Moderate | There is a need to review the cited materials to help understand the issues and how a court would likely review/proceed. | Well-Specified | 4 - Above Standards | The substance is very well done - the legal analysis is completely on point, and the prompt is a relatively narrow legal issue that still requires deep analysis to answer correctly. The gaps are minor grammar issues, which can be easily addressed. | 4 - Typical | 3 - Moderate | This would likely not be a complex analysis for a UK-based employment litigator, but a non-practitioner based in a different jurisdiction would have a difficult time with this task. | Well-Specified |
40 | Intellectual Property (IP) | Persona: You are an in-house attorney that works for a state-licensed cannabis manufacturing company (Company P) located in Washington state which manufactures cannabis that is federally illegal under the federal Controlled Substance Act.
Context:
Your company (Company P) is considering filing a lawsuit to assert pate... | **_CONFIDENTIAL, PRIVILEGED, ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT_**
**Memorandum**
To: Company P Board of Directors
From: In-House Attorney
Date: March 5, 2026
Company P is considering filing a patent infringement lawsuit against Company D for infringement of Patent 99,999,999 (the "asserted patent"), which claims methods for extr... | 43 | [
{
"rubric_category": "Structure & Style Rubric",
"score_option": 3,
"criterion": "There at least 3 sentences under each heading.",
"justification": "To ensure sufficient substance for each heading"
},
{
"rubric_category": "Structure & Style Rubric",
"score_option": 1,
"criterion": "R... | I worked in the cannabis space where this was an often-debated topic for lawyers in the space. There are many factors to consider and there were no cases directly on point. It is particularly interesting because party needs to go to federal court to enforce rights to protect a product that is federally illegal. | See citations in Golden Answer. | 5/5: This task closely mirror the type of questions that the board of a company would ask in in-house positions in a cannabis company, although this is a bit more detailed than they would typically want. | 3/5: This is moderately difficult because there has not been clear caselaw guidance other than a recent case that I hadn't been aware of when started this prompt. There are many factors that go into the analysis of whether the doctrines would apply, particularly with respect to damages. | 4 - Above Standards | The statute citations are not in Bluebook format, and other citations do not include the year or have formatting errors; one quote from a case is not verbatim. | 3 - Somewhat Typical | 4 - Hard | It does not require senior-level expertise--it does require complex reasoning and review of several statutes and cases. | Well-Specified | 4 - Above Standards | This is a realistic scenario with competing laws. | 5 - Core Activity | 4 - Hard | Requires familiarity with federal, state and patent laws as well as judgement to analyze a murky situation. | Well-Specified |
82 | Regulatory & Compliance | A mid-sized gambling boat casino in Missouri, which recently launched statewide sports wagering on 1 December 2025, would like to offer a promotion capitalizing on the recent press surrounding prediction markets by holding a “Paradise in Missouri” event in which patrons are able to make guesses at what they expect the ... | **Executive Summary**
The Legal Department for a casino operator (“the Operator”) has been asked to evaluate the proposed promotion submitted by the Marketing Department, which they have described as being inspired by the recent news regarding prediction markets and wagering on non-sports events. They are seeking inpu... | 29 | [
{
"rubric_category": "Structure & Style Rubric",
"score_option": 5,
"criterion": "Organizes response into analyses of promotion under Missouri law and regulation, and as a discretionary matter falling underneath suitability requirements for gaming licensees.",
"justification": "Required to meet prof... | As a legal professional working primarily in the casino gambling space, I wanted to come up with a prompt that would reflect my knowledge of areas that are currently in flux without a specific, accepted approach. Casino marketing immediately came to mind, as while there are certain promotion types that are widely accep... | <https://revisor.mo.gov/main/OneChapter.aspx?chapter=313> (Missouri gaming laws)
<https://www.sos.mo.gov/adrules/csr/current/11csr/11csr> (Missouri gaming regulations) | This is a highly realistic task from the perspective of either an in-house counsel answering a question from an internal client, or outside counsel responding to a request from an enterprise casino operator customer. It has real-world consequences for the operator, both from a business perspective (in that being able t... | I expect this to be a 4 (though closer to the '3' side), because it's exactly the sort of question that would require analyzing a variety of external sources as well as the lawyer's experience with and knowledge of the regulatory landscape. The The lawyer would need to be aware of recent developments in Missouri law, n... | 4 - Above Standards | I loved the fact intensity and the nuanced legal advice. It is limited to one US state (MO) and has some legal arguments in risk and considerations with limited case law support. | 3 - Somewhat Typical | 4 - Hard | It involved research and analyses of multiple laws and statutory provisions, factual considerations, public sentiment analyses, etc. It is fairly niche field of law that require expert knowledge. | Overspecified | 5 - Exemplary | The exercise is very well constructed and enjoyable to read. It needs professional expertise to complete. | 2 - Uncommon | 5 - Very Hard | This exercise requires a specific level of expertise. | Well-Specified |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.