archived
stringclasses
2 values
author
stringlengths
3
20
author_fullname
stringlengths
4
12
body
stringlengths
0
22.5k
comment_type
stringclasses
1 value
controversiality
stringclasses
2 values
created_utc
stringlengths
10
10
edited
stringlengths
4
12
gilded
stringclasses
7 values
id
stringlengths
1
7
link_id
stringlengths
7
10
locked
stringclasses
2 values
name
stringlengths
4
10
parent_id
stringlengths
5
10
permalink
stringlengths
41
91
retrieved_on
stringlengths
10
10
score
stringlengths
1
4
subreddit_id
stringclasses
1 value
subreddit_name_prefixed
stringclasses
1 value
subreddit_type
stringclasses
1 value
total_awards_received
stringclasses
19 values
True
djdillon
null
Gigli came to mind as soon as I read this! Well done. ... and how can you disrespect any of Costner's tremendous body of work??
null
0
1317409151
False
0
c2nukw5
t3_kvarj
null
t1_c2nukw5
t1_c2nijt4
null
1427668935
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
lpetrazickis
null
I read Roald Dahl.
null
0
1317409169
False
0
c2nukzr
t3_kwhif
null
t1_c2nukzr
t1_c2nuhbx
null
1427668936
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
some_dev
null
Binary data is a way to representation information. Computers manage information by managing the binary representation of that information. Your argument isn't valid.
null
0
1317409177
True
0
c2nul14
t3_kwhif
null
t1_c2nul14
t1_c2ntg0g
null
1427668937
7
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
djdillon
null
Google Wave is a perfect example of trusting your project enough to fail. I still think it was a tremendous idea. A great deal of the work done in Wave has gone on to find places in Google Docs, etc.
null
0
1317409247
False
0
c2nulf2
t3_kvarj
null
t1_c2nulf2
t1_c2nsgzs
null
1427668942
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1317409266
False
0
c2nulih
t3_kwhif
null
t1_c2nulih
t3_kwhif
null
1427668943
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
deafbybeheading
null
The problem is that many languages punt on this: they provide integers and floats, but no fixed-point support (never mind arbitrary precision arithmetic). When you need to solve a problem, rolling your own fixed-point library is the last thing you want to do, and an ad-hoc integer-based fixed-point solution is ugly and brittle.
null
0
1317409360
False
0
c2num23
t3_kwf95
null
t1_c2num23
t1_c2nu0yn
null
1427668950
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
phaker
null
After some googling around it appears F# on Mono is still WIP.
null
0
1317409544
False
0
c2nun2w
t3_kuhn3
null
t1_c2nun2w
t1_c2nrt19
null
1427668966
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
I_TYPE_IN_ALL_CAPS
null
> Floats are not reals. > Ints are not integers. [EXCEPT IN PASCAL](http://cs.nyu.edu/courses/fall99/A22.0002-003/variables.html). ;-)
null
0
1317409571
False
0
c2nun83
t3_kwf95
null
t1_c2nun83
t1_c2ntnhr
null
1427668967
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
The problem with this point, though, is that if you already have a system in place and you want to do this rethinking and redesigning of the system, most of the time you end up actually making the whole thing more complicated not less. Why is that? Because backwards compatibility is king. The idea that redoing everything from scratch is a good thing makes one gigantic assumption: People will be willing to give up the old system. That has historically been proven to false over and over again. So when you do this redesigning from the ground up, you now have changed your one problem in to two. You have to continue to support the old system (because there are people still using it) and also design/construct/support your new system. You have effectively doubled the complexity! The reason that most developers chose to add features to their software instead of just redesigning it is because they are being practical. You can think of this dream world where everyone would be willing to give up the old system, but that just doesn't reflect reality. That isn't to say that developers adding too many features isn't a problem. In fact that problem is usually known as "feature-itis", but I think that is more indicative of the quality of an individual developer, rather than the quality of the system as a whole.
null
0
1317409618
False
0
c2nunia
t3_kwhif
null
t1_c2nunia
t1_c2nuiga
null
1427668970
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Pragmataraxia
null
> You can't go to the surface; that's madness! Nothing can survive that kind of radiation. Evolutionary processes are very effective, just not optimal.
null
0
1317409634
False
0
c2nunlj
t3_kwhif
null
t1_c2nunlj
t1_c2ntzmh
null
1427668971
8
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
yellowstuff
null
Yeah, I see it as a good failure. It was truly innovative, and it seemed like the kind of thing that Google could deliver better than anyone else. The fallout may have been a little embarrassing, but it didn't cost them much. They should try more projects like that.
null
0
1317409791
False
0
c2nuohe
t3_kvarj
null
t1_c2nuohe
t1_c2nulf2
null
1427668984
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Pragmataraxia
null
Kind of... I mean mammals didn't out-compete their dinosaur masters, they just got eaten for 200 million years until something changed the game. I'm not saying that you don't have a point, but if the human race has any clear and present danger, it's our own success that is the cause...
null
0
1317409799
False
0
c2nuoj9
t3_kwhif
null
t1_c2nuoj9
t1_c2ntzoa
null
1427668984
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
featherfooted
null
IT LOOPS? Must. Watch. Again.
null
0
1317409853
False
0
c2nuotz
t3_kvtrp
null
t1_c2nuotz
t1_c2nqzcy
null
1427668987
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
SilverEyes
null
All we need to do then is find the global maximum and the shortest path to get there for a function we don't know. Wait... shit.
null
0
1317409927
False
0
c2nup8l
t3_kwhif
null
t1_c2nup8l
t1_c2ntzoa
null
1427668992
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
dealjunkie
null
Yes. From https://stripe.com/faq: We feel pretty strongly about data portability. We'll try to keep you with us by offering a better product than all of our competitors, but we won't keep you by locking you in. If you want to leave us for somebody else, we'll help you migrate your credit card data in a secure and PCI-compliant way. We're programmers at heart, and we strongly believe in open systems and a level playing field.
null
0
1317409981
False
0
c2nupjk
t3_kvu8y
null
t1_c2nupjk
t1_c2nq9va
null
1427668996
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
alexbarrett
null
Using a different algorithm each time!
null
0
1317409997
False
0
c2nupn5
t3_kvtrp
null
t1_c2nupn5
t1_c2nuotz
null
1427668997
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
ShamwowTseDung
null
AskJeeves anyone???
null
0
1317410012
False
0
c2nuppv
t3_kst87
null
t1_c2nuppv
t3_kst87
null
1427668999
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
featherfooted
null
Nope.
null
0
1317410119
False
0
c2nuq9z
t3_kwf95
null
t1_c2nuq9z
t1_c2nun83
null
1427669006
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
bitwize
null
And that's precisely why we should abandon the algroithm and switch to a synchronous, signal-based software model. Because that's precisely how the brain deals with structured information as described in the Revelation of St. John.
null
0
1317410309
False
0
c2nurc3
t3_kwhif
null
t1_c2nurc3
t1_c2ntg0g
null
1427669020
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Tordek
null
FTL Whoosh?
null
0
1317410325
False
0
c2nurfl
t3_kvnyx
null
t1_c2nurfl
t1_c2nly7l
null
1427669022
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
Hahaha. So you have no arguments and you therefore take on the language. Hahaha. thanks for the laugh.
null
0
1317410368
False
0
c2nuroe
t3_kv8db
null
t1_c2nuroe
t1_c2ntewg
null
1427669025
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Etab
null
(no disrespect at all to OP -- thanks for sharing your work) What's the appeal of light-on-dark themes? They seem to hurt my eyes. Am I just a freak or something?
null
0
1317410407
False
0
c2nurvo
t3_kvpld
null
t1_c2nurvo
t3_kvpld
null
1427669028
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
franktinsley
null
I'm not sure about the notion that users don't accept new systems. If the system is not actually an improvement, i.e., more powerful and easier to use, then yes users generally despise new systems. This happens a lot when a system is redesigned and then released because it can be difficult to know exactly what functionality really still needs to be be built into the new system. Eventually though the new system gains the functionality the users actually need and because it went through the precess of redesign the whole thing works with much less pain. It's a bit of a give and take but, in contrast, systems that are simply added to forever eventually get replaced - by lighter, faster systems that went through the rethinking process.
null
0
1317410482
True
0
c2nusb2
t3_kwhif
null
t1_c2nusb2
t1_c2nunia
null
1427669033
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
featherfooted
null
I closed it after Kruskal's the first time... MUST RELOAD SLIDES.
null
0
1317410492
False
0
c2nusdb
t3_kvtrp
null
t1_c2nusdb
t1_c2nupn5
null
1427669034
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Buckwheat469
null
Code reuse/repurpose is not the same as piling new code on top of original code. The parallel would be that a fruit fly has 137 million base pears and 8 chromosomes. It can mate, has a stomach, a beating heart, a brain, and it can even fly! It can also be used in human drug trials. A human has the same ancestral parent as the fruit fly but its DNA has been added to over the millennia. It has 3.2 billion base pairs and 46 chromosomes. These add things like consciousness, feelings, intelligence, but they also added what are now vestigial organs, like our wisdom teeth. Does that mean that because we don't need wisdom teeth anymore that the whole genome should be re-written to erase them and other vestigial organs? What about all of the viral DNA that we've included in our genome? We don't use it but it could be useful if a new threat shows up in the future. This added DNA sometimes causes problems when a copy error occurs, but it makes us who we are, and we're the most intelligent species on the planet. In software, wouldn't the program that uses the best parts of other programs be the best program of them all? Maybe a refactoring is necessary, because we can do that, but let's not throw everything away because we need to add a little extra code to make it work right.
null
0
1317410514
False
0
c2nushm
t3_kwhif
null
t1_c2nushm
t1_c2nteuq
null
1427669036
10
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
>which confirms other researchers’ findings that a person feels the most refreshed when awoken during the REM phase. This is why you're doing this? Or...what? I really cant understand the reason behind it. It "may" be cool , but from what I could see it's more like scary. Why would anyone do this to themselves?
null
0
1317410616
False
0
c2nut10
t3_ku203
null
t1_c2nut10
t3_ku203
null
1427669043
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Pxtl
null
I'm just worried about all the abandoned projects hosted on BerliOS. Ever tried to find a download for an old, abandoned piece of software, and can't find the download link anymore? Every time we lose a major file/project host, this becomes more painful.
null
0
1317410679
False
0
c2nutdm
t3_kwoid
null
t1_c2nutdm
t3_kwoid
null
1427669046
44
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
okpmem
null
If we are to use and "evolutionary" approach to fix society, we first need the right fitness function. GDP is not the right fitness function....
null
0
1317410784
False
0
c2nutyb
t3_kwhif
null
t1_c2nutyb
t1_c2nup8l
null
1427669054
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
732
null
I format my code properly, I document heavily. I write many extra necessary steps included that the user will never see. It includes many levels of hierarchy and nonsense that the user just doesn't fucking care about. But you know what. It makes it that much easier when **I** need to come back and change the code. Or another developer. Pushing hierarchy into it, makes it so that instead of copying and pasting my functions into 17 different class objects, I can just reference it. Yes, you're right. Software is about the user experience. But my life makes the user experience better if it is easier for me to fix.
null
0
1317410784
False
0
c2nutyd
t3_kwhif
null
t1_c2nutyd
t3_kwhif
null
1427669054
6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
metadave
null
Ok, so that Intel or AMD chip in your computer makes you an Intel / AMD Guy. I tried to get them to open source their designs, but I didn't get a response.
null
0
1317410824
False
0
c2nuu66
t3_kuhn3
null
t1_c2nuu66
t1_c2nl9t7
null
1427669056
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
makis
null
bello fare il programmatore in Italia, ve'?
null
0
1317411014
False
0
c2nuv65
t3_kvo92
null
t1_c2nuv65
t3_kvo92
null
1427669069
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1317411092
False
0
c2nuvli
t3_kw47b
null
t1_c2nuvli
t1_c2ntuio
null
1427669075
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
assholeapproach
null
I like it. It's soft on the eyes.
null
0
1317411102
False
0
c2nuvnj
t3_kvpld
null
t1_c2nuvnj
t3_kvpld
null
1427669077
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
kolm
null
> Similarly, if you want to be a better programmer, you ought to understand some of the theory behind the algorithms you study. If you don't understand the algorithms you use you are no better than a trained pony running in circles without an idea on why. For me, understanding algorithms is always the "play" side, implementing them is the "strenous complicated work" side, so I might be biased.
null
0
1317411117
False
0
c2nuvqt
t3_kvtrp
null
t1_c2nuvqt
t3_kvtrp
null
1427669078
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1317411124
True
0
c2nuvsj
t3_kwf95
null
t1_c2nuvsj
t3_kwf95
null
1427669078
7
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1317411160
False
0
c2nuvzr
t3_kwf95
null
t1_c2nuvzr
t1_c2ntv1s
null
1427669081
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
niczar
null
Absolutely. Unless you get the certification yourself. And if you get the certification, you don't need Stripe.
null
0
1317411393
False
0
c2nuxa1
t3_kvu8y
null
t1_c2nuxa1
t1_c2ns59f
null
1427669098
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
junkit33
null
If a tree falls in the woods...
null
0
1317411397
False
0
c2nuxb0
t3_kwoid
null
t1_c2nuxb0
t3_kwoid
null
1427669098
-21
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
some_dev
null
Louis?
null
0
1317411479
False
0
c2nuxqo
t3_kwhif
null
t1_c2nuxqo
t1_c2nurc3
null
1427669106
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
kamatsu
null
>they manage binary data - not information. The fundamental abstraction is wrong. Learn your information theory. Information *is* binary data.
null
0
1317411519
False
0
c2nuxyc
t3_kwhif
null
t1_c2nuxyc
t1_c2ntg0g
null
1427669106
6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
killerstorm
null
There is such thing as diminishing returns. Yes, general understanding of algorithms helps a lot. But diving deep into specifics -- not so much. I was a member of university's ACM ICPC team, I participated in three national level and one regional level (Southeastern Europe), so I spent quite a while learning/training algo stuff. Well, at some point I realized that it's not really worth it: it doesn't make me a better programmer as much as other things could. If you want to be a better programmer then spend more time programming practical things. You can learn all kind of things this way: algorithms, architecture, idioms, new technologies and libraries, design and so on. The trick is to pick worthy tasks to solve.
null
0
1317411630
False
0
c2nuyjd
t3_kvtrp
null
t1_c2nuyjd
t1_c2ntnzz
null
1427669113
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
lee1026
null
doubles is probably close enough - there are 52 bits in the mantissa. If you lose 1/(2^52) of a dollar every microsecond, you will lose less then a dollar in your life time.
null
0
1317411725
False
0
c2nuz36
t3_kwf95
null
t1_c2nuz36
t1_c2ntn8r
null
1427669121
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
acecool
null
Dumb question, but what if any differences are there in the design of calculators and PC hardware for math precision? TI and HP calculators use regular CPUs like the Zilog Z80 and 6502 and that were once used on home computers. Do calculators have any special hardware or software that eliminates rounding or twos compliment errors?
null
0
1317411857
False
0
c2nuzt5
t3_kwf95
null
t1_c2nuzt5
t3_kwf95
null
1427669130
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
gwax
null
Ok, let me see if I've got this right: Existing code bases are complex and require a great deal of obscure knowledge to maintain, therefore we should stop putting effort into writing maintainable code because the sooner it becomes unmaintainable, the sooner we get to throw everything away and start over from scratch. What an incredibly stupid view!
null
0
1317411857
False
0
c2nuzt8
t3_kwhif
null
t1_c2nuzt8
t3_kwhif
null
1427669130
12
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
mbetter
null
I would say that no, it's not a reasonable assumption. Tablets don't have arrow keys, nor do smartphones. Disabled users as well might have alternate arrangements for navigating on the web that do not include accessible arrow keys. Also, even when present, arrow keys are used by the browser for its own purposes. I consider it extremely rude to commandeer them unless absolutely necessary.
null
0
1317412020
False
0
c2nv0pv
t3_kvtrp
null
t1_c2nv0pv
t1_c2ntliu
null
1427669145
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
wot-teh-phuck
null
Please let me use this everywhere; I swear I'll credit you for it. ;-)
null
0
1317412069
False
0
c2nv107
t3_kwhif
null
t1_c2nv107
t1_c2nts45
null
1427669146
23
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
perluv
null
I can definitely understand the problem of losing a link that while not used often may still be valuable to quite a few folks. It would be great if Github could somehow step in and provide a community junkyard. With as many free repositories that they currently host, I can't see this being a big burden on them. By continuing to show effort in the community, it will only help their bottom line down the road.
null
0
1317412358
False
0
c2nv2o1
t3_kwoid
null
t1_c2nv2o1
t1_c2nutdm
null
1427669167
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
niggertown
null
If programming was naturally enjoyable we'd spend all of our days programming instead of masturbating. People naturally enjoy things that have a high payoff to effort ratio. If you're naturally smart programming will be more enjoyable because you don't have to sit around for days coding something that has a marginal payoff. Most people wouldn't masturbate if it took 3 days of diligent work to pull off.
null
0
1317412493
True
0
c2nv3ge
t3_kvtrp
null
t1_c2nv3ge
t3_kvtrp
null
1427669178
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
doenietzomoeilijk
null
I've spent the last few weeks mostly un-fucking code that looked a bit like that code. Only it didn't have comments, less spaces, and more lines that were >400 characters. And ternary operations WITHIN ifs. And indenting that was part tabs, part spaces.
null
0
1317412634
False
0
c2nv480
t3_kvo92
null
t1_c2nv480
t3_kvo92
null
1427669188
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
josefx
null
> Nobody really cares if a speckle of light leaks While the lightning computation itself can be imprecise, you can get really ugly tears in 'solid' objects if the vertex coordinates differ even slightly. Sometimes it is even necessary to split polygons just to make sure that the borders go through the exact same vertices even after the gpu finished transforming them.
null
0
1317412808
False
0
c2nv57u
t3_kwf95
null
t1_c2nv57u
t1_c2nu5zk
null
1427669201
7
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
seppyk
null
One major point the author failed to mention is if you are looking to make a decision, the major stakeholders need to be present at that meeting. A lot of time is wasted in meetings simply because backtracking is needed because one or more of the key stakeholders weren't present to put their stamp of approval on the decision.
null
0
1317412900
False
0
c2nv5op
t3_kv8db
null
t1_c2nv5op
t3_kv8db
null
1427669208
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
00kyle00
null
Are your threads pooled or is the startup cost on each iteration negligible? If its not, see if you can use real thread pool. Creation of Vectors may be faster if you can make it without using 'new' in threads (if you use default new, then it probably needs to synchronize internally). Did you measure where you spend most of the time? What did profiling show?
null
0
1317412985
False
0
c2nv660
t3_kwo7p
null
t1_c2nv660
t3_kwo7p
null
1427669214
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Rhomboid
null
There's also decimal floating point (DFP). Some platforms like [POWER6](http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/wikis/display/WikiPtype/Decimal+Floating+Point) support this in hardware, and it's usable from C with the IBM XL compiler and [gcc.](http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Decimal-Float.html) This is not the same as fixed-point arithmetic. You still get the vast range of floating point, but without the base conversion: the number is still stored in base 10. So you no longer have the issue where you start with an input number that can be exactly represented in base 10, but then it's converted to base 2 which doesn't have an exact representation for that number, so it must be rounded. However, this does not mean that you are free of roundoff errors: after all, you still have a fixed number of digits. And no matter the base there are always an infinite number of values that can't be represented with a fixed number of digits (e.g. 1/3 in base 10 repeats forever, 0.1 in base 2 repeats forever.) To get around that you have to use a different representation of numbers alltogether, such as storing them as a ratio. If you represented 1/3 as having a numerator of 1 and denominator of 3, you can represent it exactly without the roundoff of having to store it as 0.33333333333 where the digits eventually stop. This is the principle behind bignum/bigfloat libraries, which let you do arithmetic in arbitrary precision without any rounding. The downside is that it's much slower compared to decimal float, which is itself slower compared to binary float, unless you have hardware support.
null
0
1317413278
False
0
c2nv7tb
t3_kwf95
null
t1_c2nv7tb
t1_c2ntvgn
null
1427669236
6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
monocasa
null
Most of berlios.de doesn't appear to be under archive.org either. : \
null
0
1317413299
False
0
c2nv7y1
t3_kwoid
null
t1_c2nv7y1
t3_kwoid
null
1427669238
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Iggyhopper
null
Which is computed faster? I mean, since fixed points are just integer, are they generally faster than floats? Just curious.
null
0
1317413307
False
0
c2nv7zc
t3_kwf95
null
t1_c2nv7zc
t1_c2nu5zk
null
1427669238
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
bitwize
null
Sarcasm. Shoulda flagged it.
null
0
1317413311
False
0
c2nv80f
t3_kwhif
null
t1_c2nv80f
t1_c2nuxqo
null
1427669239
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
collision
null
We're interested in much more than the US market. (I'm from Ireland, actually, and the payment landscape there sucks.) We're working on expanding to more countries right now. Unfortunately, there's a decent amount of work involved in expanding to other countries, since we've to work with individual banks in each countries. Tl;dr: US-only is a known bug that we're addressing
null
0
1317413350
False
0
c2nv87u
t3_kvu8y
null
t1_c2nv87u
t1_c2nrwye
null
1427669240
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
collision
null
We're working on fixing that. Where are you based?
null
0
1317413369
False
0
c2nv8b5
t3_kvu8y
null
t1_c2nv8b5
t1_c2ntffo
null
1427669242
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1317413394
False
0
c2nv8g3
t3_kwf95
null
t1_c2nv8g3
t1_c2ntja8
null
1427669243
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
jlt6666
null
Or, you know, someone could just do it.
null
0
1317413469
False
0
c2nv8v6
t3_kwoid
null
t1_c2nv8v6
t1_c2nv2o1
null
1427669249
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
collision
null
I can't quite figure out what they do. We make it easy for developers to accept payments online. They seem much more businessy/stock-photo-oriented.
null
0
1317413516
False
0
c2nv95d
t3_kvu8y
null
t1_c2nv95d
t1_c2ntrmw
null
1427669252
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
joeyh
null
I've written to the Berlios admins to see if I can help preserving an archive of the software there. I'd hope to put it on archive.org.
null
0
1317413558
False
0
c2nv9dp
t3_kwoid
null
t1_c2nv9dp
t1_c2nutdm
null
1427669255
40
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Shinhan
null
ctrl+shift+t nice :)
null
0
1317413630
False
0
c2nv9ro
t3_kvtrp
null
t1_c2nv9ro
t1_c2nqzcy
null
1427669262
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
collision
null
We've been up and running in production for over a year now. We have users who rely on Stripe to process millions of dollars in sales for them. We're in this for the long haul. For whatever it's worth, [our investors include Sequoia and Peter Thiel](http://techcrunch.com/2011/09/30/sequoia-backed-stripe-launches-to-disrupt-the-online-payments-industry-with-a-developer-friendly-platform/).
null
0
1317413631
False
0
c2nv9ry
t3_kvu8y
null
t1_c2nv9ry
t1_c2nrvkt
null
1427669262
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
metamatic
null
Yeah, JavaScript is particularly bad in this respect, because you don't even have integers.
null
0
1317413652
False
0
c2nv9vw
t3_kwf95
null
t1_c2nv9vw
t1_c2num23
null
1427669263
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Amadiro
null
Whether they are faster or not is entirely dependent on the hardware you use; but fixed-points are easier to implement. So a lot of consoles and other custom-build hardware (like for instance all game consoles by nintendo) use fixed-points exclusively. On a normal PC, floats are probably faster, as there is no hardware acceleration for fixed-points.
null
0
1317413668
False
0
c2nv9yy
t3_kwf95
null
t1_c2nv9yy
t1_c2nv7zc
null
1427669264
6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
collision
null
Repeated from elsewhere, but we've been up and running in production for over a year. We're PCI Level 1 Certified, which is the strictest level of certification available from the card industry for storing cardholder data.
null
0
1317413680
False
0
c2nva0x
t3_kvu8y
null
t1_c2nva0x
t1_c2nq4r0
null
1427669265
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
TikiTDO
null
The problem is that we teach a lot of programming as if it is completely removed from computer that executes the problem. When you get into a low number software course in most non Tier 1 schools you will learn things like: "This is when you use the if statement. This is when you use a function. This is when you use a for loop." A lot of people literally have no idea what a program actually IS. To them it's a bunch of text that magically does stuff in between prints, and compilers/interpreters are the magic wands that make it all work. It blows my mind how I can talk to a skilled programmer, and the instant I mention the tree representation of a piece of code their eyes glaze over. I understand we want levels and levels of abstraction between the coder and the hardware, but that's just a tool so the coder doesn't need to constantly think about the hardware, not an invitation to pretend it doesn't exist. We need to fundamentally rethink how we approach programming education. Focus less on the whats and more on the whys and the hows. After all, programming is more than just the tools we use. It's the art of conveying information in the most elegant, direct, and comprehensive way we can imagine. We are explaining how to do ever more and more complex tasks to a little piece of silicon that throws electrical signals around a billion times per second.
null
0
1317413681
False
0
c2nva1k
t3_kwf95
null
t1_c2nva1k
t1_c2nufp1
null
1427669265
10
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
collision
null
Happy to answer this question: we only support US-based businesses right now, but that's a bug we're working on fixing. I guess we should make it clearer on the homepage.
null
0
1317413725
False
0
c2nvaac
t3_kvu8y
null
t1_c2nvaac
t1_c2nrjil
null
1427669268
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
mk_gecko
null
I guess -- run it in Wine. I'll be doing that in a few weeks as I switch from XP to Ubuntu more.
null
0
1317413743
False
0
c2nvadm
t3_kvpld
null
t1_c2nvadm
t1_c2nu6oo
null
1427669269
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
hobbified
null
> ect "et cætera" doesn't abbreviate to "ect".
null
0
1317413776
False
0
c2nvajq
t3_kwf95
null
t1_c2nvajq
t1_c2nsx2h
null
1427669272
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
gbvb
null
I agree to an extent but I think it is naive to think that frameworks and underlying foundations and the requiremnts do not impact the architecture. Continuing the somewhat lame analogy of a building, if there a big boulder in the middle of the land where you are building a library, and they want to preserve it, you will likely see that in the blueprints. That might make the blueprint a bit skewed but not invalid. Similarly, if you have a requirement to support a million users, the architecture will be influenced a lot more by the framework that can support it than a simple build POJOs or POCOs or whatever POs and expect it to all work as is.
null
0
1317413783
False
0
c2nvalf
t3_kwdsp
null
t1_c2nvalf
t3_kwdsp
null
1427669272
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
brasso
null
Maybe archive team would be interested in that.
null
0
1317413805
False
0
c2nvapo
t3_kwoid
null
t1_c2nvapo
t3_kwoid
null
1427669274
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
cunningjames
null
Well, sure, but it’s still not quite right to say “the axioms of set theory are inconsistent”. In most systems they probably consistent, and the inconsistency of plain old elementary set theory is why axiomatic systems were developed.
null
0
1317413805
False
0
c2nvapw
t3_kw47b
null
t1_c2nvapw
t1_c2nuvli
null
1427669274
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
hobbified
null
At least it's a repost with the new correct URL. All those times it was posted previously, it was at a Sun URL, which Oracle has rendered non-functioning.
null
0
1317413879
False
0
c2nvb43
t3_kwf95
null
t1_c2nvb43
t1_c2nu767
null
1427669279
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
While i don't like Node.js (really, why does it even exist?), the guy has a point . He really has a point.
null
0
1317413923
False
0
c2nvbbi
t3_kwhif
null
t1_c2nvbbi
t3_kwhif
null
1427669281
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Pandalicious
null
>I know just what you mean. No, I don't think you do...
null
0
1317413931
False
0
c2nvbd3
t3_kwisa
null
t1_c2nvbd3
t1_c2nte92
null
1427669281
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
hobbified
null
Read the article. The author is a fuckton smarter than you are.
null
0
1317413941
False
0
c2nvbf0
t3_kwf95
null
t1_c2nvbf0
t1_c2nt1us
null
1427669283
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
perluv
null
People will have an easier time mentioning your great volunteer/savior effort for this if you change your name to something more pronounceable.
null
0
1317414000
False
0
c2nvbpq
t3_kwoid
null
t1_c2nvbpq
t1_c2nv8v6
null
1427669287
-17
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
shevegen
null
Compared to github or even sourceforge, Berlios really didn't have anything extra ...
null
0
1317414252
False
0
c2nvd3y
t3_kwoid
null
t1_c2nvd3y
t3_kwoid
null
1427669304
-7
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
some_dev
null
I wasn't sure if you were him, if you were referencing him, or if it was just a coincidence. Your comment history wasn't nutty, so I assumed that it was #2.
null
0
1317414302
False
0
c2nvde5
t3_kwhif
null
t1_c2nvde5
t1_c2nv80f
null
1427669307
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
ErikRThomas
null
Maybe not, it is on the other hand a word with four syllables.
null
0
1317414321
False
0
c2nvdif
t3_kvtrp
null
t1_c2nvdif
t3_kvtrp
null
1427669310
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
progx
null
I am from Italy (I'm not Italian though) and I can say that most of the Italian programmers are terrible at their job. I think part of the issue of what makes them terrible is pride. Most of them think they are good programmers and that they don't need to improve, when in reality it's quite the opposite. It's for this reason that I avoid them like the plague and also avoid contributing to Italian forums.
null
0
1317414429
True
0
c2nve55
t3_kvo92
null
t1_c2nve55
t3_kvo92
null
1427669318
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1317414475
False
0
c2nveeu
t3_kwhif
null
t1_c2nveeu
t3_kwhif
null
1427669322
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
PervyBastard
null
No you don't. You hate C/C++ on Linux. Which admittedly is about the most horrible thing on earth, software-wise. But there is other stuff out there. Stop bitching, grow a pair and move on.
null
0
1317414480
False
0
c2nvefh
t3_kwhif
null
t1_c2nvefh
t3_kwhif
null
1427669322
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1317414533
True
0
c2nveps
t3_kwf95
null
t1_c2nveps
t1_c2nti2t
null
1427669326
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1317414875
False
0
c2nvgn0
t3_kwhif
null
t1_c2nvgn0
t1_c2nv107
null
1427669351
10
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
was_saying_boo_urns
null
for (repost=0.1; repost<=100; repost++) {repost=repost+0.1} >99.19999999999987
null
0
1317414933
False
0
c2nvgzs
t3_kwf95
null
t1_c2nvgzs
t1_c2nuiv5
null
1427669355
7
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Corgi_Cowboy
null
Are you serious? If someone I don't know who is my age or younger called me boy to my face I'd be insulted. As a grown man in America it would sound really weird if people asked who were you hanging out with last night and I said "the boys" instead of "the guys" and if you think about it there are only a few times where it would make a lot of sense to use boy over guy. I highly doubt you would describe a group like your male coworkers as boys. In terms of race it's a huge sign of disrespect and you must either not be American or have no clue about black or southern history. It goes back to the idea that even a grown black man cannot be equal with a white of similar age so they were called boy.
null
0
1317415031
False
0
c2nvhih
t3_kvo92
null
t1_c2nvhih
t1_c2nudx5
null
1427669362
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
jared84lsu
null
Way to totally miss the point, pal. When you get canned, I'm sure you'll be saying it's because you're too smart for those guys or some other horsecrap along those lines.
null
0
1317415058
False
0
c2nvho6
t3_kv8db
null
t1_c2nvho6
t1_c2nuroe
null
1427669364
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
shevegen
null
Dinosaurs were depending on the plants. And the plants changed a lot during that time, they were in a huge decline, so the dinosaurs were suddenly left with insufficient food, which led to their collapse. It is a much easier explanation than the impact of a meteor as well, because a dinosaur was HUGE and needed to eat a lot, and when it can not eat a lot there simply is no way for a dinosaur. (A climate change, which started well before the main meteor impact theory.)
null
0
1317415093
False
0
c2nvhuf
t3_kwhif
null
t1_c2nvhuf
t1_c2ntzoa
null
1427669367
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Sir_Edmund_Bumblebee
null
In some industries what you said is true, in software it couldn't be further from the truth. The barrier to entry in software is minimal in most fields, and even in tougher ones VCs are happy to throw money at you if they think you can overthrow one of the major players. Yahoo was dominant until Google came along, IBM until Microsoft, Myspace until Facebook. The amount of turnover and change in the software industry is mind-boggling. If there's some particular market that you think is sick then get a couple hacker friends, bang out a prototype, get some funding, and topple them. The VC and startup industry is basically entirely focused around toppling these sick companies.
null
0
1317415294
False
0
c2nvivs
t3_kvo92
null
t1_c2nvivs
t1_c2nudw9
null
1427669381
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
kmmeerts
null
I can't believe I ever trusted MtGox with even a small amount of money and my e-mail address.
null
0
1317415366
False
0
c2nvj9b
t3_kwf95
null
t1_c2nvj9b
t1_c2ntja8
null
1427669386
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
okpmem
null
Indeed. Because there were lots of plants, dinosaurs were in a local minima of being really big. They could not escape that hole in time...
null
0
1317415509
False
0
c2nvk15
t3_kwhif
null
t1_c2nvk15
t1_c2nvhuf
null
1427669398
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
bradleyjx
null
I wrote a piece of software that (among other things) did rankings based on pretty deep tiebreaker formulas and a ton of fractional values. Learned very quickly just how hard floating point is to manage.
null
0
1317415577
False
0
c2nvkew
t3_kwf95
null
t1_c2nvkew
t3_kwf95
null
1427669400
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Lerc
null
Every new thing has a high probability of sucking. Later versions of successful products have the same chance of sucking but a much higher visibility level. The problem is people expecting to use a sucky thing because it is descended from a non sucky thing. cf. Unity.
null
0
1317415627
False
0
c2nvkoi
t3_kwhif
null
t1_c2nvkoi
t1_c2nuje3
null
1427669404
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
quotability
null
Knowing Italy, Nepotism.
null
0
1317415696
False
0
c2nvl27
t3_kvo92
null
t1_c2nvl27
t1_c2nnn28
null
1427669410
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
Zaziel
null
I use math to estimate how much beer to buy for my parties.
null
0
1317415705
False
0
c2nvl4g
t3_kwf95
null
t1_c2nvl4g
t1_c2ntzbq
null
1427669415
6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
pgngugmgg
null
> As far as I know by now, you have no fucking idea what you're talking about. You say that someone has to program the evolution trainer so that evolution can take place in a meaningful way, and this proves that your mind has about the size of a pea, but you scream out as if you had 3 PhDs. This situation here, kid, is a classical Dunning-Kruger. As I said, I probably understand evolution much more than **you would like to admit**. You are quite predictable. > I know whether or not there is a Creator: I am the Creator. Fact is... you are nothing more than a creature, though a pretty arrogant and foolish one. Just because you are arrogant, doesn't make you the Creator. You can feel or pretend as the Creator as much and often as you want, but that can only make you look foolish. > Evolution was not a guided process. Science does not know all rules about the flow of the cause&effect ocean yet, but the beings were created by the process of evolution as properly explained by the rules that science does know. Well, I don't believe you know anything about "properly explained". You don't even know what fact is. Your 'Fact is' is a guess, but guess is not fact. Your confusion of guess with fact indicates that your grasp of the concept of fact is way below the average. I don't see any reasoning in your posts in this thread even though you seem so desperate to prove how superior you are. Cherish your version of "properly explained" things as much as you will, to me that is a garbage. > The logical sum of the universe is what "guided" evolution, meaning that it's in principle entirely decipherable by science, it is logical. The whole universe evolves according to evolutionism, so if anything related to guiding, it should be the guidee instead of the guider. Unsurprisingly your *it is logical* is a claim with zero logic in it. Good luck with your belief... and your 'Fact is...'. :-)
null
0
1317415764
False
0
c2nvlfi
t3_kucjn
null
t1_c2nvlfi
t1_c2nrluz
null
1427669415
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
True
rlbond86
null
Same as TimTheTinker, my Intro to Numerical Methods course spent a few weeks on this.
null
0
1317415804
False
0
c2nvln1
t3_kwf95
null
t1_c2nvln1
t1_c2nruvb
null
1427669417
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null