archived
stringclasses 2
values | author
stringlengths 3
20
| author_fullname
stringlengths 4
12
⌀ | body
stringlengths 0
22.5k
| comment_type
stringclasses 1
value | controversiality
stringclasses 2
values | created_utc
stringlengths 10
10
| edited
stringlengths 4
12
| gilded
stringclasses 7
values | id
stringlengths 1
7
| link_id
stringlengths 7
10
| locked
stringclasses 2
values | name
stringlengths 4
10
⌀ | parent_id
stringlengths 5
10
| permalink
stringlengths 41
91
⌀ | retrieved_on
stringlengths 10
10
⌀ | score
stringlengths 1
4
| subreddit_id
stringclasses 1
value | subreddit_name_prefixed
stringclasses 1
value | subreddit_type
stringclasses 1
value | total_awards_received
stringclasses 19
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
False | brtt3000 | t2_8796b | at least it wasn't gross or really offensive to people who don't know anything about pewdiepie | null | 0 | 1543664584 | False | 0 | eauk32w | t3_a1ysx2 | null | null | t1_eau862q | /r/programming/comments/a1ysx2/hacker_hijacks_50000_printers_with_pret_to_tell/eauk32w/ | 1546274149 | 52 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | ruinercollector | t2_4bzgg | Functions?
I find high level languages a pain point to begin with.
Some people need guidance since their feeble brain does not function without abstractions over registers and memory addresses.
/s | null | 0 | 1544794937 | False | 0 | ebrnaed | t3_a62mux | null | null | t1_ebrcu6i | /r/programming/comments/a62mux/typescript_was_it_worth/ebrnaed/ | 1547595700 | 12 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | _TRN_ | t2_20cqegxj | It's a meme. | null | 0 | 1543664756 | False | 0 | eauk6ti | t3_a1ysx2 | null | null | t1_eauicti | /r/programming/comments/a1ysx2/hacker_hijacks_50000_printers_with_pret_to_tell/eauk6ti/ | 1546274195 | 9 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | combinatorylogic | t2_iab4d | > One nitpick though, this is an Emulator you're written rather than a VM.
It's a machine, and it's virtual. Therefore, it's a VM. If it was a bit higher level, it would have been ok to call it an "abstract machine" instead, but the difference between an abstract machine and a virtual machine is very vague. | null | 0 | 1544794940 | False | 0 | ebrnak0 | t3_a61to1 | null | null | t1_ebre19j | /r/programming/comments/a61to1/write_your_own_virtual_machine/ebrnak0/ | 1547595702 | 10 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | missingdays | t2_hmjbf | TL;DR - You can't always rewrite software from scratch, so deal with it. When you are working on legacy code, make it better - refactor, write unit tests. | null | 0 | 1543664782 | False | 0 | eauk7eb | t3_a21sg3 | null | null | t3_a21sg3 | /r/programming/comments/a21sg3/time_to_change_your_attitude_towards_legacy_code/eauk7eb/ | 1546274203 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | JimJamJamie | t2_5asup | \> and got the load time down to 16ms
When your webpage refreshes at 60FPS | null | 0 | 1544794989 | False | 0 | ebrndwm | t3_a55xbm | null | null | t1_eblirwd | /r/programming/comments/a55xbm/how_the_dreamcast_copy_protection_was_defeated/ebrndwm/ | 1547595743 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | saber_aureum | t2_1rvfj9yr | Why would anyone do that? Huge waste of time | null | 0 | 1543664784 | False | 0 | eauk7g9 | t3_a1ysx2 | null | null | t3_a1ysx2 | /r/programming/comments/a1ysx2/hacker_hijacks_50000_printers_with_pret_to_tell/eauk7g9/ | 1546274204 | -22 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | EWJacobs | t2_bash7 | You solve this by just having competent programmers that know how if statements work in your language. You don't solve it by making your code unreadable your code with additional markup. | null | 0 | 1544795110 | False | 0 | ebrnld2 | t3_a5ylm8 | null | null | t1_ebr52i2 | /r/programming/comments/a5ylm8/should_have_used_ada_1_how_some_famous/ebrnld2/ | 1547595836 | -3 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | [deleted] | None | tl;tr: "To me, feminism means that your gender shouldn’t affect your opportunities." | null | 0 | 1543664819 | False | 0 | eauk88d | t3_a22biq | null | null | t3_a22biq | /r/programming/comments/a22biq/becoming_a_better_supporter_of_women_in_tech/eauk88d/ | 1546274213 | 15 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | vital_chaos | t2_6h1nj | Teaching a politician how to understand something does not guarantee they will not choose to ignore that knowledge and work against it anyway. | null | 0 | 1544795134 | False | 0 | ebrnmun | t3_a63ff2 | null | null | t3_a63ff2 | /r/programming/comments/a63ff2/we_as_an_industry_should_do_our_best_to_ensure/ebrnmun/ | 1547595855 | 11 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | ovebrearingRhombus | t2_1r87lejc | What a load of politically charged virtue signalling. | null | 0 | 1543664837 | False | 0 | eauk8n8 | t3_a22biq | null | null | t3_a22biq | /r/programming/comments/a22biq/becoming_a_better_supporter_of_women_in_tech/eauk8n8/ | 1546274218 | 44 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | [deleted] | None | [deleted] | null | 0 | 1544795167 | False | 0 | ebrnp2f | t3_a5umm4 | null | null | t3_a5umm4 | /r/programming/comments/a5umm4/phoenixliveview_interactive_realtime_apps_no_need/ebrnp2f/ | 1547595882 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | mellett68 | t2_5vex5 | I was too young to program on the Amiga really, but it was my childhood computer. Maybe one day I'll dust it off and learn. | null | 0 | 1543664878 | False | 0 | eauk9jr | t3_a1rp4s | null | null | t1_eatspvi | /r/programming/comments/a1rp4s/why_is_2_i_i_faster_than_2_i_i_java/eauk9jr/ | 1546274229 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | 888808888 | t2_tf1pq | It's not deprecated because they don't do the same thing, and one might want to use the one or the other. | null | 0 | 1544795293 | False | 0 | ebrnxiz | t3_a5umpk | null | null | t1_ebral4u | /r/programming/comments/a5umpk/10_new_features_in_java_11/ebrnxiz/ | 1547595987 | 2 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | aka-rider | t2_mp2al | I have "The C++ memory model" opened in the adjacent tab :)
On a scale 0-10 how good are you at C++?
Bjarne Stroustrup: 7
Me: Oh f*ck | null | 0 | 1543664892 | False | 0 | eauk9v4 | t3_a1roi0 | null | null | t1_eauaje3 | /r/programming/comments/a1roi0/how_to_optimize_c_and_c_code_in_2018/eauk9v4/ | 1546274233 | 3 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | Zakman-- | t2_is8um | Wouldn't say niche mate considering how many small businesses there are and how many of them create simple CRUD applications.
The difference between this and other solutions is that changing 3-5 lines of code would turn Razor Components into Blazor (from server-side to client-side). | null | 0 | 1544795337 | False | 0 | ebro0j2 | t3_a5ssxk | null | null | t1_ebr2xfj | /r/programming/comments/a5ssxk/razor_components_for_a_javascriptfree_frontend_in/ebro0j2/ | 1547596024 | 3 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | Bananabarbedwire | t2_15p4uhp4 | I thought this was the point with cloud services, the ability to "loan" some computing power from someone.
How is this different from that?
Genuine question | null | 0 | 1543665071 | False | 0 | eaukdxo | t3_a22fay | null | null | t3_a22fay | /r/programming/comments/a22fay/aws_infrastructure_as_code_using_aws_cdk/eaukdxo/ | 1546274283 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | [deleted] | None | [deleted] | null | 0 | 1544795381 | False | 0 | ebro3e3 | t3_a60dlr | null | null | t1_ebrft9a | /r/programming/comments/a60dlr/the_difference_between_interpreted_languages_and/ebro3e3/ | 1547596059 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | bdtddt | t2_x8et0 | How is success an argument against the commenters personal opinion of the games? | null | 0 | 1543665080 | False | 0 | eauke5i | t3_a1y1rq | null | null | t1_eauhj5z | /r/programming/comments/a1y1rq/al_lowe_reveals_his_sierra_source_code/eauke5i/ | 1546274286 | 5 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | gitPullOriginMaster | t2_1fei35e9 | Every major browser compiles JavaScript to machine code.. it is not *interpreted*. | null | 0 | 1544795497 | False | 0 | ebrob14 | t3_a60dlr | null | null | t3_a60dlr | /r/programming/comments/a60dlr/the_difference_between_interpreted_languages_and/ebrob14/ | 1547596157 | -9 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | krakentoa | t2_ebdkw | You mean this? Given it was spearheaded by a main Haskell dev, and the features of haskell that were used (replacement rules, replayability given initial input), like some commenters I don't see the point of reinventing the wheel in an unfamiliar shape. https://code.facebook.com/posts/745068642270222/fighting-spam-with-haskell/ | null | 1 | 1543665165 | False | 0 | eaukg44 | t3_a1yh8f | null | null | t1_eaujhbi | /r/programming/comments/a1yh8f/categories_for_the_working_hacker_by_philip_wadler/eaukg44/ | 1546274310 | -1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | IGI111 | t2_7zcpw | Counterpoint: Just In Time compilation is a form of interpretation. | null | 0 | 1544795609 | False | 0 | ebroiiy | t3_a60dlr | null | null | t1_ebrob14 | /r/programming/comments/a60dlr/the_difference_between_interpreted_languages_and/ebroiiy/ | 1547596278 | 8 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | aka-rider | t2_mp2al | I was lucky enough not to face it.
Also I was impressed that HHVM team created a *CPU cache emulator* to find the reason of a performance degrade. We under appreciate the diagnostic tools we have. | null | 0 | 1543665241 | False | 0 | eaukhwt | t3_a1roi0 | null | null | t1_eau9dw8 | /r/programming/comments/a1roi0/how_to_optimize_c_and_c_code_in_2018/eaukhwt/ | 1546274332 | 5 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | 888808888 | t2_tf1pq | Really? You're complaining that Java gets updates? I bet you complain that linux/osx/windows get updates all the time too.
Code I've written in 1998 on jdk 1.1 still runs unmodified today on jdk 11. The only exception I've seen so far is when Swing was a new thing, and they changed the package name from whatever it was to javax.swing. Have never seen any other problems in all my years as a java dev. | null | 0 | 1544795628 | False | 0 | ebrojv9 | t3_a5umpk | null | null | t1_ebqly87 | /r/programming/comments/a5umpk/10_new_features_in_java_11/ebrojv9/ | 1547596295 | 5 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | TizardPaperclip | t2_13xs8h1h | Printing from the web is fundamentally stupid.
If a printer is further away from you than your local network, it's too far away for you to retrieve the printout anyway.
Printing from within a company or university network still makes sense, of course.
| null | 0 | 1543665335 | False | 0 | eaukk65 | t3_a1ysx2 | null | null | t1_eauehvy | /r/programming/comments/a1ysx2/hacker_hijacks_50000_printers_with_pret_to_tell/eaukk65/ | 1546274360 | 158 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | kandiyohi | t2_h0bvncc | Really nice article.
I tried Ada a while back, and I really didn't understand any of the complaints about it. I just had to spend an hour learning the syntax, and it was a fairly simple language to reason with. The verbosity initially sucks for the first 15 minutes, but after that it's really nice to come back to and try to understand what you wrote late last night.
Also, that compiler is frustrating; in a good way. It will grill your code and make sure every case statement has all cases covered (among other, more important things). | null | 0 | 1544795668 | False | 0 | ebromis | t3_a5ylm8 | null | null | t3_a5ylm8 | /r/programming/comments/a5ylm8/should_have_used_ada_1_how_some_famous/ebromis/ | 1547596328 | 12 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | thebritisharecome | t2_im1m9 | You wash stuff and do groceries daily? that's like once a week thing for me! | null | 0 | 1543665355 | False | 0 | eaukko5 | t3_a0s88m | null | null | t1_eaugt3p | /r/programming/comments/a0s88m/if_its_not_fun_anymore_you_get_nothing_from/eaukko5/ | 1546274366 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | tetroxid | t2_d19nz | `cat | grep `
ಠ_ಠ | null | 0 | 1544795824 | False | 0 | ebroxai | t3_a5sg9k | null | null | t3_a5sg9k | /r/programming/comments/a5sg9k/how_unix_programmers_at_restaurants_search_menus/ebroxai/ | 1547596462 | 3 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | aka-rider | t2_mp2al | Thanks. I will watch it.
From the title, it seems like I had to watch this video before writing the post :) | null | 0 | 1543665451 | False | 0 | eaukmzi | t3_a1roi0 | null | null | t1_eatnb6f | /r/programming/comments/a1roi0/how_to_optimize_c_and_c_code_in_2018/eaukmzi/ | 1546274424 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | tetroxid | t2_d19nz | > standardise the way fds from disk are piped
That's why the shell itself can do it, no need for cat:
`<file program1 | program2 | program3` | null | 0 | 1544795973 | False | 0 | ebrp83y | t3_a5sg9k | null | null | t1_ebp7wao | /r/programming/comments/a5sg9k/how_unix_programmers_at_restaurants_search_menus/ebrp83y/ | 1547596595 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | Raenryong | t2_6xu1w | "Increased diversity" bullshit again. If they were truly concerned about various different perspectives, they would be all for people like Damore, rather than the current idea of "diversity" akin to some bizarre game of Pokemon. | null | 0 | 1543665574 | False | 0 | eaukq54 | t3_a22biq | null | null | t3_a22biq | /r/programming/comments/a22biq/becoming_a_better_supporter_of_women_in_tech/eaukq54/ | 1546274463 | 17 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | [deleted] | None | [deleted] | null | 0 | 1544796066 | False | 0 | ebrpesp | t3_a5sg9k | null | null | t1_eboxuas | /r/programming/comments/a5sg9k/how_unix_programmers_at_restaurants_search_menus/ebrpesp/ | 1547596678 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | f_r_d | t2_5jen2mz | Seems to be the case. | null | 0 | 1543665575 | False | 0 | eaukq67 | t3_a1uri3 | null | null | t1_eatlo1m | /r/programming/comments/a1uri3/do_your_part_squash_bugs_for_kdenlive_quick/eaukq67/ | 1546274464 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | rickspam | t2_484pj | How would tunneling through a protocol, change your mac address? | null | 0 | 1544796139 | False | 0 | ebrpk5k | t3_a5rb95 | null | null | t1_ebow70l | /r/programming/comments/a5rb95/free_hotel_wifi_with_python_and_selenium/ebrpk5k/ | 1547596744 | 2 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | conventionistG | t2_3zcam | It's all fun and games until someone mandates quotas on corporate boards. | null | 0 | 1543665628 | False | 0 | eaukrgv | t3_a22biq | null | null | t1_eaujpuo | /r/programming/comments/a22biq/becoming_a_better_supporter_of_women_in_tech/eaukrgv/ | 1546274479 | 24 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | lsfxz | t2_14ww2p | Semi-related: `up` is a tool from heaven when working with pipes:
[https://github.com/akavel/up](https://github.com/akavel/up) | null | 0 | 1544796321 | False | 0 | ebrpxyx | t3_a5sg9k | null | null | t1_ebp36ei | /r/programming/comments/a5sg9k/how_unix_programmers_at_restaurants_search_menus/ebrpxyx/ | 1547596943 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | Mooks79 | t2_hlcfk6a | Well this is pretty strong evidence that the current IP system has wandered far from its original intention, and is now more about large companies (in this case trying, but usually succeeding) to abuse the system for their own gain at the cost of individuals/small companies. | null | 0 | 1543665642 | False | 0 | eaukrtw | t3_a1tazn | null | null | t3_a1tazn | /r/programming/comments/a1tazn/company_google_tried_to_patent_my_work_after_a/eaukrtw/ | 1546274484 | 0 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | narwi | t2_7s32m | Exactly how would Ada prevent a merge mistake like the following from happening and having exactly the same effect as C ?
`Ret_Error := SSL_Hash_SHA1.Update (Hash_Ctx, Signed_Params);`
`if Ret_Error /= OK then`
`goto Fail;`
`end if;`
`goto Fail;` | null | 0 | 1544796330 | False | 0 | ebrpyqz | t3_a5ylm8 | null | null | t3_a5ylm8 | /r/programming/comments/a5ylm8/should_have_used_ada_1_how_some_famous/ebrpyqz/ | 1547596953 | 2 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | funkinaround | t2_5ngc9 | >Your Scala code is also very invalid
Fine. Thanks for fixing it up.
>That solution is much more complicated and also ugly.
I would argue that it's simpler, especially if there is ever the desire to refactor the `Option`s once you know you can provide them, which I believe is a point Rich makes in his talk. When I worked on a Scala codebase that allowed the use of `Option`, there was rarely a case class that didn't make use of `Option` and there were quite a few classes that made heavy use of `Option`, to the point where every member was `Option`. Some of this design may have just been defensive in the sense that "I know I can retrieve these values now, but what if I can't in the future? Better make it an `Option`!" This design locked in these class definitions as trying to refactor the usage of these `Option`s would have been a large undertaking, and this design encouraged further proliferation. It was impossible to tell why something was an `Option` and it just served to make code that used these case classes more complex than they often needed to be.
Contrast that to the schema/select style. A car is defined by what it should be and not what its components might be. Functions making use of cars declare what, if anything, they need from a car, and they can be sure that when they execute, they will execute with a `year` if that is required. I would also think that performance would be better in a schema/select design than having `Option`; there is less work for an optimizer to do when all uses of `year` don't have to be followed by `exists`. Don't the tradeoffs seem evident? You declare something as `Option`, so every single time you want to use it, you need to check. If you have schema/select, every time you want to use it, you just need to declare it in your context (at the top of a function).
With respect to ugliness, just on the surface level, Lisp is so much more beautiful than Algol-style syntax languages. But the deeper beauty with Lisp is how the syntax enables macros that are so much better than C-style macros or C++-style metaprogramming. I have practically no experience with Scala macros, but at first glance, the `q""` form string interpolator is significantly more ugly than the way Lisps do things. | null | 0 | 1543665688 | False | 0 | eauksyg | t3_a1o5iz | null | null | t1_eauhvb5 | /r/programming/comments/a1o5iz/maybe_not_rich_hickey/eauksyg/ | 1546274498 | 2 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | ShinyHappyREM | t2_1038di | An abstract machine has to be overridden while a virtual machine may be overridden? | null | 0 | 1544796436 | False | 0 | ebrq7c0 | t3_a61to1 | null | null | t1_ebrnak0 | /r/programming/comments/a61to1/write_your_own_virtual_machine/ebrq7c0/ | 1547597060 | 10 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | omlette_du_chomage | t2_13y9hr | You better go unsub from tseries | null | 0 | 1543665762 | False | 0 | eaukuof | t3_a1ysx2 | null | null | t1_eauicti | /r/programming/comments/a1ysx2/hacker_hijacks_50000_printers_with_pret_to_tell/eaukuof/ | 1546274519 | 38 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | chowderl | t2_1q5ni5k5 | and title like '%shrimp%'
Anyway we would have to import that txt into a database first. | null | 0 | 1544796464 | False | 0 | ebrq9oz | t3_a5sg9k | null | null | t1_ebptg02 | /r/programming/comments/a5sg9k/how_unix_programmers_at_restaurants_search_menus/ebrq9oz/ | 1547597089 | 3 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | a_dog_and_his_gun | t2_iy05i | except if you happen to want to work in a field where your gender happens to be the majority (from practical step 3) | null | 0 | 1543665858 | False | 0 | eaukx74 | t3_a22biq | null | null | t1_eauk88d | /r/programming/comments/a22biq/becoming_a_better_supporter_of_women_in_tech/eaukx74/ | 1546274551 | 4 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | deceased_parrot | t2_7q7zg | > Wouldn't say niche mate considering how many small businesses there are and how many of them create simple CRUD applications.
When I said "niche" I meant a niche for which this particular technology was superior to the already existing ones. And then asked for an explanation as to _how_ this is superior to the already existing solutions.
I don't mean that internal or B2B are niche, I meant the niche within that segment where Razor/Blazor is superior to already established technologies.
> The difference between this and other solutions is that changing 3-5 lines of code would turn Razor Components into Blazor (from server-side to client-side).
And this solves which problem exactly? | null | 0 | 1544796472 | False | 0 | ebrqacu | t3_a5ssxk | null | null | t1_ebro0j2 | /r/programming/comments/a5ssxk/razor_components_for_a_javascriptfree_frontend_in/ebrqacu/ | 1547597097 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | tenfingerperson | t2_2251jhr6 | That’s not how it works.. you need to do some sort of authentication to retrieve your stuff | null | 0 | 1543665984 | False | 0 | eaul0no | t3_a1ysx2 | null | null | t1_eaujujt | /r/programming/comments/a1ysx2/hacker_hijacks_50000_printers_with_pret_to_tell/eaul0no/ | 1546274594 | 10 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | gngeorgiev | t2_q0bfr | That's a real horror movie if I ever saw one | null | 0 | 1544796603 | False | 0 | ebrqlfp | t3_a61to1 | null | null | t1_ebrfsro | /r/programming/comments/a61to1/write_your_own_virtual_machine/ebrqlfp/ | 1547597235 | 2 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | Pelicantaloupe | t2_91bt9 | we need more open source in universities | null | 0 | 1543666000 | False | 0 | eaul13f | t3_a1ysx2 | null | null | t1_eaujujt | /r/programming/comments/a1ysx2/hacker_hijacks_50000_printers_with_pret_to_tell/eaul13f/ | 1546274598 | 7 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | HalibetLector | t2_17d4bn | Is there a randomizer on my point score for this comment? I get a different score every time I refresh.
https://imgur.com/a/eiDriOc | null | 0 | 1544796623 | False | 0 | ebrqn79 | t3_a5o7qs | null | null | t1_eboffbt | /r/programming/comments/a5o7qs/female_engineer_chats_to_james_damore_sex/ebrqn79/ | 1547597257 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | GYN-k4H-Q3z-75B | t2_lbonz | The primary reason why there aren't many women in tech, especially software development, is lack of interest. And that's okay. You can't force people to be interested in anything. | null | 0 | 1543666036 | False | 0 | eaul203 | t3_a22biq | null | null | t3_a22biq | /r/programming/comments/a22biq/becoming_a_better_supporter_of_women_in_tech/eaul203/ | 1546274610 | 17 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | imguralbumbot | t2_180i376 | ^(Hi, I'm a bot for linking direct images of albums with only 1 image)
**https://i.imgur.com/uwnawFh.mp4**
^^[Source](https://github.com/AUTplayed/imguralbumbot) ^^| ^^[Why?](https://github.com/AUTplayed/imguralbumbot/blob/master/README.md) ^^| ^^[Creator](https://np.reddit.com/user/AUTplayed/) ^^| ^^[ignoreme](https://np.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=imguralbumbot&subject=ignoreme&message=ignoreme) ^^| ^^[deletthis](https://np.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=imguralbumbot&subject=delet%20this&message=delet%20this%20ebrqnw0) | null | 0 | 1544796632 | False | 0 | ebrqnw0 | t3_a5o7qs | null | null | t1_ebrqn79 | /r/programming/comments/a5o7qs/female_engineer_chats_to_james_damore_sex/ebrqnw0/ | 1547597265 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | MortiferaJ | t2_9ua6e | So cloud computing gives users the ability to use servers setup by the cloud computing provider (e.g. Google Cloud, Microsoft Azure, or Amazon Web Services). You essentially borrow usage of resources that are physically owned by the provider.
The configuration of those resources still needs to be done by the user. And this is what CDK tries to simplify.
When cloud computing as a platform first started, this was all manually done through a website. It was laborious and prone to human error.
As time went on people wrote complex scripts to do the configurations but these only solved certain scenarios (like launching infrastructure in a new region but not necessarily updating the state of current infrastructure).
Then later models like CloudFormation came about allowing infrastructure to be defined in a configuration file. Now this is the next evolution of that where you write code which essentially creates the CloudFormation configuration file.
Hope this answers your question. I may have gone too in-depth.
Tl;Dr this helps you get configure that computing power you wish to use in a much better way than we have now. | null | 0 | 1543666100 | False | 0 | eaul3pd | t3_a22fay | null | null | t1_eaukdxo | /r/programming/comments/a22fay/aws_infrastructure_as_code_using_aws_cdk/eaul3pd/ | 1546274630 | 3 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | papertowelroll17 | t2_ywfyrs | Automated tests and logging are something that I would build in any application. They make development faster, not slower.
Some of your other examples though may be reasonable to punt on. For instance maybe this service isn't facing the open internet and doesn't have sensitive data, so is elaborate security a good investment? "Database without indexes" is a kind of odd example, but being more general, I'm usually fine with inefficient algorithms absent evidence that it is creating a meaningful bottleneck.
Also, there is a big difference between intentionally valuing simplicity and being lazy. Most of time I am continuously refactoring code to make it shorter and more simple. I'm not advocating for "it works so don't touch it", I'm arguing against the creation of Rude Goldberg machines under the premise of "quality architecture" with pipes and plumbing! | null | 0 | 1544796655 | False | 0 | ebrqpuu | t3_a5y50c | null | null | t1_ebr8308 | /r/programming/comments/a5y50c/why_bad_software_architecture_is_easy_to_monetize/ebrqpuu/ | 1547597289 | 3 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | AndyBainbridge | t2_za9qp | > In nanoseconds, those are 5ns-5.7ns-5.7ns-11.6ns. Now, there's certainly some CPU bookkeeping overhead, but not 50ns worth.
I agree, it is hard to see what causes the difference between the SDRAM manufacturers latency figures and the observed 60-100ns of latency people say "RAM access" has.
First up, if I understand Wikipedia correctly, the latencies are more like 13ns, not 5ns or 5.7ns like you said: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DDR4_SDRAM#JEDEC_standard_DDR4_module[57]
Next, we have to consider what we mean by a RAM access. Lets say we've got DDR4-2666 and we write a C program that creates a 2 GByte array and reads 32-bit ints from that array, from random offsets, as quickly as possible and calculates their sum. The table is too big to fit in cache, so the CPU will have to read from RAM.
Here's what I think happens:
CPU core fetches and decodes a read-from-memory instruction.
Virtual address translated to physical address via TLB. Since our address is random, we will almost certainly get a TLB miss, which means the memory controller has to get the page table entry for the virtual address we requested. The funny part here is that the page table entries are stored in
RAM. If the one we want is not already in the cache, then we have to read it from RAM. The even funnier part is the page tables are in a tree - we need to walk the tree from the root node that represents all of memory, through many layers until we get to the leaf node that represents the page we are interested in. If the cache is empty, each hop on the tree traversal causes a read from RAM. This gets boring quickly, so I will assume we have enabled huge pages and that the page table entry is in cache. As a result, we get the physical address in a few clock cycles.
Now the CPU looks for the data in each level of cache:
L1 checked for hit. Fail.
L2 checked for hit. Fail.
L3 checked for hit. Fail. By now on 4 GHz Skylake, 42 cycles or 10ns have gone by since the read instruction started to execute - https://www.7-cpu.com/cpu/Skylake.html.
So now the memory controller has to actually start talking to the DDR4 DIMM over a memory channel.
Let's assume that the part of RAM we want to read isn't already busy (refreshing, being written to etc). Let's also assume that somebody else hasn't already read from the part we want, because if they have, the "row buffer" might already contain the row we want, which would save us half the work. Let's assume nothing else in the CPU is busy using the memory channel we need. Given the C program I described, and an otherwise unloaded system, there's >90% chance these assumptions are true.
Now the memory controller issues an "active" command, which selects the bank and row. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synchronous_dynamic_random-access_memory#SDRAM_construction_and_operation). It waits some time for that to happen (this is the row-to-column delay and is about 10-15ns). Then the memory controller issues a "read" command, which selects the column. Then it waits a bit more (this is the CAS latency, another 10-15 ns). Then data starts to be transmitted back to the memory controller.
Then somehow the data gets back to the CPU and the read instruction can complete.
There are various clock domain crossings on the way to and from the SDRAM - the CPU, memory controller, memory channel and memory internal clocks are all running at different rates. To transfer data from one clock domain to the other, I guess, costs something like half a clock cycle of the slower clock, on average.
Then there are overheads like switching the memory channel from read to write takes some cycles.
I think I can make all this add up to about 40ns. I wrote the C program and timed it (I had to take special measures to prevent the CPU from speculatively issuing lots of RAM reads in parallel). The result was 60ns per read. So there's about 20ns of overhead remaining that I don't understand. | null | 0 | 1543666118 | 1543677316 | 0 | eaul46a | t3_a1sbwp | null | null | t1_eatc4lj | /r/programming/comments/a1sbwp/not_all_cpu_operations_are_created_equal/eaul46a/ | 1546274636 | 3 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | gott_modus | t2_j2d1j | >Even in that case, "appealing" to morality is an effective business strategy.
I never said it wasn't. What you're failing to see here is that Mozilla was originally the people behind Netscape, and Netscape was a strictly for-profit business with investors in '94. They _pivoted into open source_ because Microsoft was fucking them. They didn't initially set out to do shit but make money.
>Loads of people are completely willing to pay premium for perceived or real morality of their product. Think bio-labels, fair trade and clean energy. Tesla isn't just selling cars because they're cool, but also because it's customer feel good about helping save the climate (how legitimate that actually is when you buy a new car every year and jet around the world isn't usually considered).
Poor example for choice of argument: Tesla hasn't been shown to be widely successful yet as a company that's worth investing long-term in.
Because that's your only example here, the argument itself means shit.
>That being said, this is not actually how the world works. To come back to reddit's darling, mister Musk: Was founding a rocket company from scratch a good idea? No, it wasn't. It was ideologically motivated and still is. No sane share holder would green-light projects like the BFR. So the company isn't selling shares and keeps investing in business plans to could tank the entire company.
Yes, and has "Mister" Musk _really_ been successful as far as this is concerned? Do we see _actual_ evidence of us making these goals he has set out to achieve? Or has it all just been fun and games? Because I'm seeing the latter.
Honestly, how can you take seriously someone who blatantly makes a 420 joke in some market pumping scheme, is accused of market manipulation for said pumping scheme, and then can't even effectively smoke a joint on a talk show in the aftermath from that?
What does that say about someone? It clearly says that they don't give a _fuck_ about what they're doing beyond direct appearances. To them, it's all just well-executed publicity stunts that have literally no more value than John McAfee "running" for president in 2016.
>Except they do. Let's take another tech example: The Linux Foundation. Tell me it's not an ideologically motivated company.
Oh, sure. But it's also one that has contributed more than Mozilla is capable of, at least currently. I'm not the biggest fan of Stallman, but I'll say that GCC et al is a huge reason alone to keep the FSF alive. They provide something of _value_ that's been _proven_ in industry, (that also hasn't created a crippled landscape of shitty programmers as a byproduct of their choices). They also started _out_ as the FSF, and didn't merely become one out of reaction.
>Of course, the entities sponsoring it are often doing so because they use Linux for profit or simply for good publicity.
I see little reason for any business to use it for "good publicity": it's effectively dominated enough markets now on merit and financial advantage alone.
>Where I agree with you is that most publicly held companies these days are purely motivated purely by profit. They will sometimes do the right thing, but only motivated by potential profit.
Yes, and since most of these are what exist in the landscape, they effectively have more influence over the climate than non-profits.
>>Any company that has to appeal to morality as a survival mechanism in this economy, especially when their competitors blatantly aren't, is essentially second rate.
>I don't even know where to start with this...
>Let's for a moment assume that companies do indeed work the way you seem to imagine. That is to say, any company is essentially an automaton with executives who aren't people but simple profit-automation systems.
By stating this, you're effectively stating that executives _aren't_ like this.
Time and time again they've been shown to operate this way; i.e., the decisions they make always wind up being what effects their bottom line. And rightly so: that's how this world works.
Organizations "care" about people in terms of how they can convince them that what they offer is of primary value over competing organizations. Usually this means putting on as much of a moral facade as absolutely necessary, but no more.
>Even in that case, "appealing" to morality is an effective business strategy. Loads of people are completely willing to pay premium for perceived or real morality of their product. Think bio-labels, fair trade and clean energy. Tesla isn't just selling cars because they're cool, but also because it's customer feel good about helping save the climate (how legitimate that actually is when you buy a new car every year and jet around the world isn't usually considered).
I never said it was ineffective, and I _also_ never said that other businesses don't follow this. What I did say was that Mozilla _has_ to use this in order to survive. It's one of their business _assets_. Google's business model is a search engine and whatever other domain-of-the-half-decade they've chosen to attempt to monopolize legally. Their "don't be evil" slogan is really more of a meme now, than anything else. They blatantly and legally racketeer against other companies through entities like Project Zero.
And yet, clearly, we see other companies who _don't_ operate solely on this principle. Oracle and Facebook are excellent examples of this. Facebook is_highly_ successful, because they offer something of value that other people struggle without, despite blatantly immoral practices on people's privacy.
>>I agree this means very little.
>>That's fine. My experience is the same, and I use it as a default in Linux as well. Still doesn't make what I'm saying invalid.
>>Firefox is totally necessary, in the same sense that AMD is necessary. Both have done useful things, but neither are leading in their respective domains.
>So you're saying they're equal, one is just more equal. It seems to me, either one is clearly superior (which you say Chrome is) or they're roughly equivalent (which you say they are).
No, I'm not saying they're equal. Note that we're discussing _companies_ and not _browsers_. There's a difference, here. Firefox works - I never said it didn't. On Linux I use it because I've been too busy to think "oh, I should install Chrome", and so far I've had zero reason to do so.
>I'm just assuming you tripped up in your sentence, because DuckDuckGo does not use Google.
You're assuming wrong, because `!g` is a common enough prefix in DuckDuckGo searches, which causes the search to be encrypted.
>Anyway, I'm not stupid. But there are degrees. I mean you don't jump into a fire because you burnt your finger and now it doesn't matter anymore anyway.
This is a poor analogy: you're assuming that in this case the fire hasn't already engulfed you. In the case of the Internet, it more or less has.
>My point was simply this: A browser can make it easier to harder for you to keep privacy intrusions to a minimum. Now, which browser do you trust more, the one developed by a company making more than 90% of their revenue via targeted ads, or the independent non-profit?
The independent non-profit who accepts donations in the milllions from other large, for-profit businesses (Google included)? You _do_ realize that a large reason why Mozilla exists is to prevent companies from Google being accused of monopoly, right?
I trust neither company, because, as far as this is concerned, neither have made decisions which show any form of integrity. | null | 0 | 1544796660 | 1544797134 | 0 | ebrqqbm | t3_a5bwkl | null | null | t1_ebn2s46 | /r/programming/comments/a5bwkl/firefox_developer_edition/ebrqqbm/ | 1547597295 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | no_nick | t2_44sv6 | To clarify, the printer doesn't just print your job. You have to go there, log in and then let it print your job | null | 0 | 1543666203 | False | 0 | eaul6im | t3_a1ysx2 | null | null | t1_eaujujt | /r/programming/comments/a1ysx2/hacker_hijacks_50000_printers_with_pret_to_tell/eaul6im/ | 1546274666 | 11 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | gott_modus | t2_j2d1j | (post was too long)
>If I may allow myself my own, regretful, snide remark: You're not doing a very good job.
Oh, really?
This whole conversation started because some fanboy decided to spew a really lame insult toward shevegen. I told him it was dumb. Instead of defending that, he chose to target my saying of Mozilla as a second-rate company _using the exact same points_ he was using against our dear shevegen here, which I already stated were invalid.
And then you tell me I'm "belittling" him simply because I think anyone who says "I don't see you writing a browser" (as a response to someone critiquing the _business_ as a whole) is making a really dumb remark.
Surely even you can agree that's stupid.
>>What nature values is clear.
>Reproduction? It's kinda the only reason we exist if you want to argue on that level.
Sure, but that's not really what I was referring to here.
>>It's perfectly reasonable to derive objective meaning from that alone.
>Yes, I too like sex.
Witty remark, wrong association.
>But seriously, neither of us arguing "objective" truth. We're arguing world views, ideology and economy. None of those topics are in the realm of objective facts or natural laws.
All of which have their own _nature_ associated with them, and with respect to other opposing entities or views. This is what I was referring to. And this _is_ objective.
I.e., organizations compete. In order to compete, they have to provide something of value. What defines their current value in the market is heavily influenced on the amount of people who subscribe to what they offer over other organizations, and these organizations act as direct competitors.
If an organization has to use humanitarian values in a capitalistic economy as a means of survival (in a more explicit and direct way than other competing organizations do) so that they can accrue more users for their product, and the product itself isn't really based on humanitarian values, then they are not as a effective as an organization as a whole.
Furthermore, if their main product is equal in quality or _marginally_ better than their competitor's, _non_ main product, that _also_ says something about the quality of them as a company in comparison to their competing entity.
____
Based on Mozilla's history it's perfectly reasonable to say that they _lack_ integrity and they're 100% superficial. If you actually think they wouldn't fuck you for the right amount of money, you're effectively a tool, because it's clear that they're a for-profit business in disguise. _That_ is what makes them a second-rate _company_. | null | 0 | 1544796688 | 1544796972 | 0 | ebrqsql | t3_a5bwkl | null | null | t1_ebn2s46 | /r/programming/comments/a5bwkl/firefox_developer_edition/ebrqsql/ | 1547597325 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | WizardyoureaHarry | t2_yhtmn | Genius Pewds strikes again. | null | 1 | 1543666286 | False | 0 | eaul8r5 | t3_a1ysx2 | null | null | t3_a1ysx2 | /r/programming/comments/a1ysx2/hacker_hijacks_50000_printers_with_pret_to_tell/eaul8r5/ | 1546274693 | -6 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | Sledger721 | t2_8ns9f | Dealing with the recursion of handling something like if(5 + 9 > (4 - (2 * 1))) is killing me right now in the compiler that I'm writing.
It compiles out to assembly/machine code of a VM that I wrote. | null | 0 | 1544796756 | False | 0 | ebrqykt | t3_a61to1 | null | null | t1_ebreae9 | /r/programming/comments/a61to1/write_your_own_virtual_machine/ebrqykt/ | 1547597426 | 18 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | [deleted] | None | [deleted] | null | 0 | 1543666309 | False | 0 | eaul9et | t3_a1ysx2 | null | null | t3_a1ysx2 | /r/programming/comments/a1ysx2/hacker_hijacks_50000_printers_with_pret_to_tell/eaul9et/ | 1546274701 | -42 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | HeadAche2012 | t2_873xv | Very cool, exactly what I needed as I was in the process of writing a JVM loosely based on this as reference code: https://www.codeproject.com/Articles/24029/%2FArticles%2F24029%2FHome-Made-Java-Virtual-Machine | null | 0 | 1544796906 | False | 0 | ebrrbip | t3_a61to1 | null | null | t3_a61to1 | /r/programming/comments/a61to1/write_your_own_virtual_machine/ebrrbip/ | 1547597587 | 4 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | suhcoR | t2_rzwyn0 | The article actually discusses Python vs JavaScript; it correctly states that Node.js is a runtime environment for JS. The original purpose of JS is scripting of browser-based HTML pages. The original purpose of Node.js is server-side asynchronous applications in JS. Python in contrast is a general purpose scripting language. We can conclude that it doesn't make much sense to ask whether it is better to learn Python or Node.js, or even Python or JS. The question should be more specific "for browser based or asynchronous server side backend applications". From that you can conclude that for people who want to specialize in browser based or server side applications JS would be a good choice because it is well established and about six times faster in median than Python; in contrast people who need a scripting language for everything and are not up to the best performance would rather focus on Python. So Node and Python obviously have a different audience and field of application; the question thus has the wrong focus. | null | 0 | 1543666330 | 1543667094 | 0 | eaul9y5 | t3_a1txxe | null | null | t3_a1txxe | /r/programming/comments/a1txxe/discussion_node_or_python/eaul9y5/ | 1546274707 | 2 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | NiteLite | t2_3m0dq | Software development should be prohibitively expensive, so you can only do it once or twice per month? :P | null | 0 | 1544796951 | False | 0 | ebrrfgp | t3_a6308n | null | null | t3_a6308n | /r/programming/comments/a6308n/software_development_should_be_more_like_eating/ebrrfgp/ | 1547597636 | 3 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | therearesomewhocallm | t2_4qsdr | Pretty sure he's the most watched youtuber.
So I guess some people decided he needs more money? | null | 0 | 1543666361 | False | 0 | eaulatb | t3_a1ysx2 | null | null | t1_eauicti | /r/programming/comments/a1ysx2/hacker_hijacks_50000_printers_with_pret_to_tell/eaulatb/ | 1546274719 | -17 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | HeadAche2012 | t2_873xv | Okay, that’s good to hear, just a recompile and you should be good with any jre for the most part | null | 0 | 1544796985 | False | 0 | ebrrig7 | t3_a5umpk | null | null | t1_ebrojv9 | /r/programming/comments/a5umpk/10_new_features_in_java_11/ebrrig7/ | 1547597674 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | Daneel_Trevize | t2_dxefp | California did this, right? | null | 0 | 1543666381 | False | 0 | eaulbdf | t3_a22biq | null | null | t1_eaukrgv | /r/programming/comments/a22biq/becoming_a_better_supporter_of_women_in_tech/eaulbdf/ | 1546274726 | 14 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | Loonacy | t2_4abzn | The title makes it seem like her name is Evelyn Berezin Word and she was a processor pioneer. | null | 0 | 1544797002 | False | 0 | ebrrjul | t3_a63q5y | null | null | t3_a63q5y | /r/programming/comments/a63q5y/evelyn_berezin_word_processor_pioneer_dies_aged_93/ebrrjul/ | 1547597691 | 88 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | AAZZAAMM | t2_20qow4wi | Well that hasn't been true since the birth of technology. I can't name a single female developer who has created something. In my programming class there are 5 girls. 5 girls in a strength of 33. Can you say the university is discriminating against girls? | null | 0 | 1543666464 | False | 0 | eauldrc | t3_a22biq | null | null | t1_eaukrgv | /r/programming/comments/a22biq/becoming_a_better_supporter_of_women_in_tech/eauldrc/ | 1546274755 | -10 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | stupodwebsote | t2_16iquzue | > Ada (and SPARK) syntax is super simple/readable, intuitively understandable, you need to know only basic English (not mathematics, not algebraic abstractions, not weird operators, etc). Code in Haskell looks like stream of operators
And now they're going for font ligatures and "Unicode conceals" (wtf!!) so what you see isn't what you get, it's like they're asking for trouble
https://github.com/i-tu/Hasklig/blob/master/README.md
https://github.com/dag/vim2hs/blob/master/README.md | null | 0 | 1544797053 | False | 0 | ebrro9y | t3_a5ylm8 | null | null | t1_ebrau76 | /r/programming/comments/a5ylm8/should_have_used_ada_1_how_some_famous/ebrro9y/ | 1547597747 | 4 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | mghoffmann | t2_mje3q | Don't tell me how to live my life. I'll forward port 53 to my printer if I want. | null | 0 | 1543666466 | False | 0 | eauldt2 | t3_a1ysx2 | null | null | t1_eaud49r | /r/programming/comments/a1ysx2/hacker_hijacks_50000_printers_with_pret_to_tell/eauldt2/ | 1546274755 | 2 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | [deleted] | None | [deleted] | null | 0 | 1544797080 | 1544800964 | 0 | ebrrqd2 | t3_a5sg9k | null | null | t1_ebr9tb2 | /r/programming/comments/a5sg9k/how_unix_programmers_at_restaurants_search_menus/ebrrqd2/ | 1547597772 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | zesterer | t2_g3g1z | I think it's more a case of fighting the poorly considered restrictions your language places upon the compiler's ability to optimise. | null | 0 | 1543666484 | False | 0 | eaulebg | t3_a1rp4s | null | null | t1_eaujui5 | /r/programming/comments/a1rp4s/why_is_2_i_i_faster_than_2_i_i_java/eaulebg/ | 1546274762 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | SamProf | t2_2fxvjzt4 | Now, already fixed. | null | 0 | 1544797126 | False | 0 | ebrru91 | t3_a5kug2 | null | null | t1_ebp7kxq | /r/programming/comments/a5kug2/blazorfiddle_blazor_net_developer_playground_code/ebrru91/ | 1547597821 | 2 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | CommonEconomy | t2_2i3qekg4 | > He shows that the alternative to Maybe in Clojure is to use schema/select
That to me seems just like a Clojure flavored version of row types, not an alternative to Maybe.
You still will have places in your code at which point year/model might not have a value. What happens then? I don't know, maybe I have to learn Clojure and this spec language to try it out myself, but the examples given are orthogonal to issue Maybe type solves. What I see seems to just deal with more explicit requirements specification of a function (ala row types, again) and simpler destructuring syntax for nested structures.
**edit:**
let me rephrase it after taking a second look at you example, you mean to tell me that the Clojure code will implicitly skip over the cars that are missing a year value? | null | 0 | 1543666581 | False | 0 | eaulgrl | t3_a1o5iz | null | null | t1_eatopqp | /r/programming/comments/a1o5iz/maybe_not_rich_hickey/eaulgrl/ | 1546274792 | 3 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | sickofthisshit | t2_bw07 | I think you are putting too much weight on the term "dynamic" and essentially taking it to mean "cannot be compiled" which makes your statement empty.
Common Lisp to me is very dynamic, in that it supports a lot of what I would call "late redefinition", but a large part of the Lisp work in the 1970s was discovering how to preserve much of what was good about Lisp while still allowing reasonable compilation to efficient machine code. Some of that was advances in understanding variable scope and environments, some of it was adding support to declare invariants for the compiler.
One of the tragedies about Python is how little respect the language paid to this kind of knowledge. | null | 0 | 1544797143 | False | 0 | ebrrvly | t3_a60dlr | null | null | t1_ebrfpvy | /r/programming/comments/a60dlr/the_difference_between_interpreted_languages_and/ebrrvly/ | 1547597837 | 7 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | AngularBeginner | t2_eky8x | > I can't name a single female developer who has created something.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Hamilton_(scientist) | null | 0 | 1543666717 | False | 0 | eauljr9 | t3_a22biq | null | null | t1_eauldrc | /r/programming/comments/a22biq/becoming_a_better_supporter_of_women_in_tech/eauljr9/ | 1546274829 | 9 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | HeadAche2012 | t2_873xv | Quake3 had a VM based on LCC that did load time compilation of Bytecode: https://github.com/raspberrypi/quake3/blob/master/code/qcommon/vm_x86.c | null | 0 | 1544797164 | False | 0 | ebrrxb1 | t3_a61to1 | null | null | t1_ebrhgmg | /r/programming/comments/a61to1/write_your_own_virtual_machine/ebrrxb1/ | 1547597858 | 5 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | mcb3k | t2_4gzqu | FYI, according to the CC FAQ, it would be better to use one of the open source licenses than to use a CC license for code.
"Unlike software-specific licenses, CC licenses do not contain specific terms about the distribution of source code, which is often important to ensuring the free reuse and modifiability of software. Many software licenses also address patent rights, which are important to software but may not be applicable to other copyrightable works. "
https://creativecommons.org/faq/#can-i-apply-a-creative-commons-license-to-software | null | 0 | 1543666720 | False | 0 | eauljtz | t3_a1tazn | null | null | t1_eat66u0 | /r/programming/comments/a1tazn/company_google_tried_to_patent_my_work_after_a/eauljtz/ | 1546274830 | 4 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | combinatorylogic | t2_iab4d | > in that it supports a lot of what I would call "late redefinition"
Which is just one little dereferencing. Not any different from how dynamic libraries are implemented. Nothing dynamic there.
> One of the tragedies about Python is how little respect the language paid to this kind of knowledge.
Of course. All such languages are mostly a result of an ignorance. Guido is proud of knowing nothing at all about PLT.
| null | 0 | 1544797357 | False | 0 | ebrscwy | t3_a60dlr | null | null | t1_ebrrvly | /r/programming/comments/a60dlr/the_difference_between_interpreted_languages_and/ebrscwy/ | 1547598079 | 7 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | spacecatapult | t2_4u7uu | I’d encourage you to ask any women you in tech if they agree. | null | 0 | 1543666852 | False | 0 | eaulmt9 | t3_a22biq | null | null | t1_eaujpuo | /r/programming/comments/a22biq/becoming_a_better_supporter_of_women_in_tech/eaulmt9/ | 1546274866 | 9 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | theoldboy | t2_5n3yf | It's plausible enough for this type of error to be classified as [CWE-563](https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/563.html). | null | 0 | 1544797458 | False | 0 | ebrsl55 | t3_a5ylm8 | null | null | t1_ebqxk3s | /r/programming/comments/a5ylm8/should_have_used_ada_1_how_some_famous/ebrsl55/ | 1547598181 | 2 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | elmicha | t2_35jys | Even my puny home router has port filters for IPv6, just like for IPv4. | null | 0 | 1543667071 | False | 0 | eaulsf4 | t3_a1ysx2 | null | null | t1_eaui5wm | /r/programming/comments/a1ysx2/hacker_hijacks_50000_printers_with_pret_to_tell/eaulsf4/ | 1546274936 | 18 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | johnmudd | t2_1wgu | Yes, if only it was actively being developed. | null | 0 | 1544797576 | False | 0 | ebrsuqn | t3_a5umm4 | null | null | t1_ebrf41j | /r/programming/comments/a5umm4/phoenixliveview_interactive_realtime_apps_no_need/ebrsuqn/ | 1547598300 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | TizardPaperclip | t2_13xs8h1h | > Print from your phone without connecting to wifi.
Most phones have Bluetooth *and* Wi-Fi these days. Both of those are designed for tasks like printing.
| null | 0 | 1543667161 | False | 0 | eauluz8 | t3_a1ysx2 | null | null | t1_eaujy6w | /r/programming/comments/a1ysx2/hacker_hijacks_50000_printers_with_pret_to_tell/eauluz8/ | 1546274967 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | ThePillsburyPlougher | t2_13gwlg | The question ends with "More importantly, what do you think?" It sounds to me like he was looking for general advise on what he was doing as well. | null | 0 | 1544797586 | False | 0 | ebrsvje | t3_a5sg9k | null | null | t1_ebrh42a | /r/programming/comments/a5sg9k/how_unix_programmers_at_restaurants_search_menus/ebrsvje/ | 1547598311 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | NorthReindeer | t2_21ust2lz | It’s impossible under such conditions. It’ll be necessary to sacrifice some of important options that have demand. | null | 0 | 1543667214 | False | 0 | eaulwd7 | t3_a22mux | null | null | t3_a22mux | /r/programming/comments/a22mux/why_wouldnt_they_make_an_exchange_fully/eaulwd7/ | 1546275014 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | IGI111 | t2_7zcpw | You're literally begging the question.
Hell you could argue both sides with such a logic, that we're so capitalist that mere regulation makes everyone recoil, or that statists are so rampant that you have to say you're not for full on statism before advocating regulation, lest people confuse you with them.
Truth is, any regulation or lack thereof being sensible is an independant matter.
The ethicacy of regulation cannot be reaonably inferred from regulation being ethical or not altogether. | null | 0 | 1544797587 | False | 0 | ebrsvon | t3_a61jek | null | null | t1_ebrhkvt | /r/programming/comments/a61jek/we_need_an_fda_for_algorithms/ebrsvon/ | 1547598312 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | DontBeSpooked-Frank | t2_5kn39cz | but what if I want to email my printer? | null | 0 | 1543667297 | False | 0 | eaulyqb | t3_a1ysx2 | null | null | t1_eaukk65 | /r/programming/comments/a1ysx2/hacker_hijacks_50000_printers_with_pret_to_tell/eaulyqb/ | 1546275043 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | papertowelroll17 | t2_ywfyrs | It sounds like the product you are building is meant to be a platform, and the "flexibility" you are referring to are core features. I feel that the things you are mentioning are perfectly reasonable design requirements, not added complexity that lacks specific business value. | null | 0 | 1544797594 | False | 0 | ebrsw7t | t3_a5y50c | null | null | t1_ebrddau | /r/programming/comments/a5y50c/why_bad_software_architecture_is_easy_to_monetize/ebrsw7t/ | 1547598319 | 14 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | freakhill | t2_5oqxd | That tells more about your lack of knowledge than about women. | null | 0 | 1543667310 | False | 0 | eaulz2h | t3_a22biq | null | null | t1_eauldrc | /r/programming/comments/a22biq/becoming_a_better_supporter_of_women_in_tech/eaulz2h/ | 1546275047 | 11 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | jokubolakis | t2_4yfdo | Same. It is the end of the compiler course, I tried to have a challenge and write the AST with a visitor pattern (inspired by the book "Crafting Interpreters") and I'm loving it. | null | 0 | 1544797740 | 1544825053 | 0 | ebrt86r | t3_a61to1 | null | null | t1_ebrqykt | /r/programming/comments/a61to1/write_your_own_virtual_machine/ebrt86r/ | 1547598467 | 11 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | HandieAndy_ | t2_13sxhm | We need less | null | 0 | 1543667335 | False | 0 | eaulzp9 | t3_a1ysx2 | null | null | t1_eaul13f | /r/programming/comments/a1ysx2/hacker_hijacks_50000_printers_with_pret_to_tell/eaulzp9/ | 1546275055 | -10 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | blackn1ght | t2_3mjzv | Yes. There was a topic in /r/javascript not too long ago in regards to TypeScript, and there are devs (I'm guessing they've never used a typed language) who believe that as long as you name your variables correctly, then you don't need a typed language, and that types only holds you back.
| null | 0 | 1544797797 | False | 0 | ebrtcvy | t3_a61eig | null | null | t1_ebrixoj | /r/programming/comments/a61eig/types_and_why_you_should_care/ebrtcvy/ | 1547598525 | 18 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | shevegen | t2_atqp | I find it awkward how men are writing these articles.
I have a great suggestion - how about letting women write these articles? Because I am getting increasingly tired of opinionated "male supporters" thinking they know what "has to be done" - and telling us about it. | null | 0 | 1543667386 | False | 0 | eaum13d | t3_a22biq | null | null | t3_a22biq | /r/programming/comments/a22biq/becoming_a_better_supporter_of_women_in_tech/eaum13d/ | 1546275072 | 11 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | Ravek | t2_72i2j | Reading this back it wasn’t very nuanced what I said. It’s not like I would advocate firing someone on the spot for a tiny mistake, and I don’t even disagree that it might be better design for a language to enforce explicit braces (Swift does that and I don’t hate it)
But I do think that if this kind of error is something a developer regularly runs into, they’d better be really new because you can’t afford to be careless on the regular while writing code. I would love for my compiler to catch any and all trivial mistakes (and more modern languages do a lot in this respect), but they don’t, and correctness is hugely important for software. | null | 0 | 1544797874 | False | 0 | ebrtj4a | t3_a5ylm8 | null | null | t1_ebren7t | /r/programming/comments/a5ylm8/should_have_used_ada_1_how_some_famous/ebrtj4a/ | 1547598632 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | AffectionateTell | t2_21uzxsx0 | There’re more than enough of various decentralized exchanges in the market, but they work slowly and no one needs them. | null | 0 | 1543667431 | False | 0 | eaum2bs | t3_a22mux | null | null | t3_a22mux | /r/programming/comments/a22mux/why_wouldnt_they_make_an_exchange_fully/eaum2bs/ | 1546275087 | 7 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | ipv6-dns | t2_1t534du4 | in 10 years they will come up with a special keyboard with special symbols. Their evolution is definitely moving in the opposite direction ;)
[http://www.rexswain.com/aplkeyb.gif](http://www.rexswain.com/aplkeyb.gif) | null | 0 | 1544797929 | False | 0 | ebrtnmr | t3_a5ylm8 | null | null | t1_ebrro9y | /r/programming/comments/a5ylm8/should_have_used_ada_1_how_some_famous/ebrtnmr/ | 1547598687 | 3 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | shevegen | t2_atqp | Nah. That only shows your lack of knowledge.
Here is one from the fields of bioinformatics (though it was not called bioinformatics back then):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Oakley_Dayhoff
The thing is - you evidently are trollolling while showing no knowledge. Please do not waste our time and educate yourself - wikipedia is a good starting point. | null | 0 | 1543667457 | False | 0 | eaum31k | t3_a22biq | null | null | t1_eauldrc | /r/programming/comments/a22biq/becoming_a_better_supporter_of_women_in_tech/eaum31k/ | 1546275096 | 5 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | alexwh | t2_8y4xh | When you refer to a language being compiled/interpreted, you refer to the most popular implementations method, for convenience. | null | 0 | 1544797966 | False | 0 | ebrtqmx | t3_a60dlr | null | null | t1_ebrist5 | /r/programming/comments/a60dlr/the_difference_between_interpreted_languages_and/ebrtqmx/ | 1547598725 | 0 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | shevegen | t2_atqp | The question then, if we use the sentence is - why is the word "feminism" used here? If we attribute that meaning then the word is a misnomer.
I did not finish reading that article though - I find it to be qualitatively too bad. | null | 0 | 1543667514 | False | 0 | eaum4o9 | t3_a22biq | null | null | t1_eauk88d | /r/programming/comments/a22biq/becoming_a_better_supporter_of_women_in_tech/eaum4o9/ | 1546275116 | 11 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | mezentinemechtard | t2_2oxqw0xc | Using an autoformatter doesn't mean running it explicitely (that's a personal helper). Code formatters and linters must be a part of the build process. | null | 0 | 1544797972 | False | 0 | ebrtr6a | t3_a5ylm8 | null | null | t1_ebr8lvt | /r/programming/comments/a5ylm8/should_have_used_ada_1_how_some_famous/ebrtr6a/ | 1547598731 | 3 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |