Farjfar/SGS-ukpolitics · Datasets at Hugging Face

body_cleaned stringlengths 19 6.16k	id stringlengths 3 7	subreddit stringclasses 3 values	year int64 2.01k 2.02k	annotation1 stringlengths 19 6.2k	annotation2 stringlengths 19 6.17k	gold_annotation stringlengths 19 6.17k	bio_annotation sequencelengths 5 1.06k	ids sequencelengths 5 1.06k	tokenized_body_cleaned sequencelengths 5 1.06k
so the state government is passing government regulations limiting what local governments can do with items they purchase . exactly how does this fit in with the small government mantra of the republican party ? ? ?	c9pvir4	politics	2,013	so the @@state government## is passing government regulations limiting what local governments can do with items they purchase . exactly how does this fit in with the small government mantra of the @@republican party## ? ? ?	so the @@state government## is passing government regulations limiting what @@local governments## can do with items they purchase . exactly how does this fit in with the small government mantra of the @@republican party## ? ? ?	so the @@state government## is passing government regulations limiting what @@local governments## can do with items they purchase . exactly how does this fit in with the small government mantra of the @@republican party## ? ? ?	[ "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "so", "the", "state", "government", "is", "passing", "government", "regulations", "limiting", "what", "local", "governments", "can", "do", "with", "items", "they", "purchase", ".", "exactly", "how", "does", "this", "fit", "in", "with", "the", "small", "government", "mantra", "of", "the", "republican", "party", "?", "?", "?" ]
they lose the power to nickel and dime customers to death though .	cbdxpfl	politics	2,013	they lose the power to nickel and dime customers to death though .	they lose the power to nickel and dime customers to death though .	they lose the power to nickel and dime customers to death though .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "they", "lose", "the", "power", "to", "nickel", "and", "dime", "customers", "to", "death", "though", "." ]
so go ahead and show us the data on what you read '' . i read ... '' is worth exactly zero around here . facts and data please .	cbwhm5h	politics	2,013	so go ahead and show us the data on what you read '' . i read ... '' is worth exactly zero around here . facts and data please .	so go ahead and show us the data on what you read '' . i read ... '' is worth exactly zero around here . facts and data please .	so go ahead and show us the data on what you read '' . i read ... '' is worth exactly zero around here . facts and data please .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "so", "go", "ahead", "and", "show", "us", "the", "data", "on", "what", "you", "read", "``", ".", "i", "read", "...", "``", "is", "worth", "exactly", "zero", "around", "here", ".", "facts", "and", "data", "please", "." ]
is media matters biased ? do they have an agenda themselves ?	ckmoo5g	politics	2,014	is media matters biased ? do they have an agenda themselves ?	is media matters biased ? do they have an agenda themselves ?	is media matters biased ? do they have an agenda themselves ?	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "is", "media", "matters", "biased", "?", "do", "they", "have", "an", "agenda", "themselves", "?" ]
one of my biggest frustrations with obama is his failure to understand the need to keep dangerous people off the streets .	ci8jtov	politics	2,014	one of my biggest frustrations with obama is his failure to understand the need to keep dangerous people off the streets .	one of my biggest frustrations with obama is his failure to understand the need to keep @@dangerous people## off the streets .	one of my biggest frustrations with obama is his failure to understand the need to keep @@dangerous people## off the streets .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "one", "of", "my", "biggest", "frustrations", "with", "obama", "is", "his", "failure", "to", "understand", "the", "need", "to", "keep", "dangerous", "people", "off", "the", "streets", "." ]
four hours in class before lunch , then four more hours locked down . 8 hours .	chy4l8z	politics	2,014	four hours in class before lunch , then four more hours locked down . 8 hours .	four hours in class before lunch , then four more hours locked down . 8 hours .	four hours in class before lunch , then four more hours locked down . 8 hours .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "four", "hours", "in", "class", "before", "lunch", ",", "then", "four", "more", "hours", "locked", "down", ".", "8", "hours", "." ]
i do n't think you answered my question either schmuck . there 's a real problem , there 's real crimes being perpetrated by our own agencies , and then there 's the messenger who is being loyal to his people , not the people who process his paycheck . i do n't care if the messenger broke the slaver 's law . explain to me why anyone should ? what angle do you have here ? '' what angle does anyone have for going after snowden ahead of the nsa , unless , they also process your paycheck . we would n't have had a single revolution on this planet or started putting an end to outright slavery without people like this . snowden 's a real american hero , oohrah !	chvlr5q	politics	2,014	i do n't think you answered my question either schmuck . there 's a real problem , there 's real crimes being perpetrated by our own agencies , and then there 's the messenger who is being loyal to his people , not the people who process his paycheck . i do n't care if the messenger broke the slaver 's law . explain to me why anyone should ? what angle do you have here ? '' what angle does anyone have for going after snowden ahead of the nsa , unless , they also process your paycheck . we would n't have had a single revolution on this planet or started putting an end to outright slavery without people like this . snowden 's a real american hero , oohrah !	i do n't think you answered my question either schmuck . there 's a real problem , there 's real crimes being perpetrated by our own agencies , and then there 's the messenger who is being loyal to his people , not the people who process his paycheck . i do n't care if the messenger broke the slaver 's law . explain to me why anyone should ? what angle do you have here ? '' what angle does anyone have for going after snowden ahead of the @@nsa## , unless , they also process your paycheck . we would n't have had a single revolution on this planet or started putting an end to outright slavery without people like this . snowden 's a real american hero , oohrah !	i do n't think you answered my question either schmuck . there 's a real problem , there 's real crimes being perpetrated by our own agencies , and then there 's the messenger who is being loyal to his people , not the people who process his paycheck . i do n't care if the messenger broke the slaver 's law . explain to me why anyone should ? what angle do you have here ? '' what angle does anyone have for going after snowden ahead of @@the nsa## , unless , they also process your paycheck . we would n't have had a single revolution on this planet or started putting an end to outright slavery without people like this . snowden 's a real american hero , oohrah !	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "i", "do", "n't", "think", "you", "answered", "my", "question", "either", "schmuck", ".", "there", "'s", "a", "real", "problem", ",", "there", "'s", "real", "crimes", "being", "perpetrated", "by", "our", "own", "agencies", ",", "and", "then", "there", "'s", "the", "messenger", "who", "is", "being", "loyal", "to", "his", "people", ",", "not", "the", "people", "who", "process", "his", "paycheck", ".", "i", "do", "n't", "care", "if", "the", "messenger", "broke", "the", "slaver", "'s", "law", ".", "explain", "to", "me", "why", "anyone", "should", "?", "what", "angle", "do", "you", "have", "here", "?", "``", "what", "angle", "does", "anyone", "have", "for", "going", "after", "snowden", "ahead", "of", "the", "nsa", ",", "unless", ",", "they", "also", "process", "your", "paycheck", ".", "we", "would", "n't", "have", "had", "a", "single", "revolution", "on", "this", "planet", "or", "started", "putting", "an", "end", "to", "outright", "slavery", "without", "people", "like", "this", ".", "snowden", "'s", "a", "real", "american", "hero", ",", "oohrah", "!" ]
you do n't know shit about kanye west .	cftsiqv	politics	2,014	you do n't know shit about kanye west .	you do n't know shit about kanye west .	you do n't know shit about kanye west .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "you", "do", "n't", "know", "shit", "about", "kanye", "west", "." ]
hahaha , wow . do you generally dig in when proven utterly wrong ?	chpyo6i	politics	2,014	hahaha , wow . do you generally dig in when proven utterly wrong ?	hahaha , wow . do you generally dig in when proven utterly wrong ?	hahaha , wow . do you generally dig in when proven utterly wrong ?	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "hahaha", ",", "wow", ".", "do", "you", "generally", "dig", "in", "when", "proven", "utterly", "wrong", "?" ]
til there 's muslims in oklahoma ? and are n't in the closet about it ?	cksjhry	politics	2,014	til there 's @@muslims## in oklahoma ? and are n't in the closet about it ?	til there 's @@muslims## in oklahoma ? and are n't in the closet about it ?	til there 's @@muslims## in oklahoma ? and are n't in the closet about it ?	[ "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "til", "there", "'s", "muslims", "in", "oklahoma", "?", "and", "are", "n't", "in", "the", "closet", "about", "it", "?" ]
you are so right , him and those like him , limbaugh , hannity , are at the putrid core of what the far right has become .	cfhnxjw	politics	2,014	you are so right , him and those like him , limbaugh , hannity , are at the putrid core of what @@the far right## has become .	you are so right , him and those like him , limbaugh , hannity , are at the putrid core of what the far right has become .	you are so right , him and those like him , limbaugh , hannity , are at the putrid core of what @@the far right## has become .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "you", "are", "so", "right", ",", "him", "and", "those", "like", "him", ",", "limbaugh", ",", "hannity", ",", "are", "at", "the", "putrid", "core", "of", "what", "the", "far", "right", "has", "become", "." ]
that does n't make it not a misconception . the founders or the constitution or other founding documents being infallible is another big misconception .	ch9f1mh	politics	2,014	that does n't make it not a misconception . @@the founders## or the constitution or other founding documents being infallible is another big misconception .	that does n't make it not a misconception . the founders or the constitution or other founding documents being infallible is another big misconception .	that does n't make it not a misconception . @@the founders## or the constitution or other founding documents being infallible is another big misconception .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "that", "does", "n't", "make", "it", "not", "a", "misconception", ".", "the", "founders", "or", "the", "constitution", "or", "other", "founding", "documents", "being", "infallible", "is", "another", "big", "misconception", "." ]
his father was cuban . ted cruz had to go through the naturalization process in order to receive his american citizenship , thus he 's ineligible .	cf3joj5	politics	2,014	his father was cuban . ted cruz had to go through the naturalization process in order to receive his american citizenship , thus he 's ineligible .	his father was cuban . ted cruz had to go through the naturalization process in order to receive his american citizenship , thus he 's ineligible .	his father was cuban . ted cruz had to go through the naturalization process in order to receive his american citizenship , thus he 's ineligible .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "his", "father", "was", "cuban", ".", "ted", "cruz", "had", "to", "go", "through", "the", "naturalization", "process", "in", "order", "to", "receive", "his", "american", "citizenship", ",", "thus", "he", "'s", "ineligible", "." ]
vigilantism is not the way to end gunviolence .	cf8i925	politics	2,014	vigilantism is not the way to end gunviolence .	vigilantism is not the way to end gunviolence .	vigilantism is not the way to end gunviolence .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "vigilantism", "is", "not", "the", "way", "to", "end", "gunviolence", "." ]
coors field might be the only stadium that can be called a massive success story . there are a few others that were n't huge failures , but most do n't break even in a costbenefit analysis . to add another , useless anecdote chase field in phoenix was modeled after coors field and that was not at all a success . i know the economics of stadiums has been in peer reviewed journals , but i ca n't seem to dig any up . there 's plenty of fairly well researched opinion pieces , though . example . URL	cf8sed8	politics	2,014	coors field might be the only stadium that can be called a massive success story . there are a few others that were n't huge failures , but most do n't break even in a costbenefit analysis . to add another , useless anecdote chase field in phoenix was modeled after coors field and that was not at all a success . i know the economics of stadiums has been in peer reviewed journals , but i ca n't seem to dig any up . there 's plenty of fairly well researched opinion pieces , though . example . URL	coors field might be the only stadium that can be called a massive success story . there are a few others that were n't huge failures , but most do n't break even in a costbenefit analysis . to add another , useless anecdote chase field in phoenix was modeled after coors field and that was not at all a success . i know the economics of stadiums has been in peer reviewed journals , but i ca n't seem to dig any up . there 's plenty of fairly well researched opinion pieces , though . example . URL	coors field might be the only stadium that can be called a massive success story . there are a few others that were n't huge failures , but most do n't break even in a costbenefit analysis . to add another , useless anecdote chase field in phoenix was modeled after coors field and that was not at all a success . i know the economics of stadiums has been in peer reviewed journals , but i ca n't seem to dig any up . there 's plenty of fairly well researched opinion pieces , though . example . URL	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "coors", "field", "might", "be", "the", "only", "stadium", "that", "can", "be", "called", "a", "massive", "success", "story", ".", "there", "are", "a", "few", "others", "that", "were", "n't", "huge", "failures", ",", "but", "most", "do", "n't", "break", "even", "in", "a", "costbenefit", "analysis", ".", "to", "add", "another", ",", "useless", "anecdote", "chase", "field", "in", "phoenix", "was", "modeled", "after", "coors", "field", "and", "that", "was", "not", "at", "all", "a", "success", ".", "i", "know", "the", "economics", "of", "stadiums", "has", "been", "in", "peer", "reviewed", "journals", ",", "but", "i", "ca", "n't", "seem", "to", "dig", "any", "up", ".", "there", "'s", "plenty", "of", "fairly", "well", "researched", "opinion", "pieces", ",", "though", ".", "example", ".", "URL" ]
because that 's the new republican strategy now . any sort of criticism lobbied against them must be met with some sort of false dichotomy .	cfzvcny	politics	2,014	because that 's the new republican strategy now . any sort of criticism lobbied against them must be met with some sort of false dichotomy .	because that 's the new republican strategy now . any sort of criticism lobbied against them must be met with some sort of false dichotomy .	because that 's the new republican strategy now . any sort of criticism lobbied against them must be met with some sort of false dichotomy .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "because", "that", "'s", "the", "new", "republican", "strategy", "now", ".", "any", "sort", "of", "criticism", "lobbied", "against", "them", "must", "be", "met", "with", "some", "sort", "of", "false", "dichotomy", "." ]
well ya , why would manufacturers do what they did in the past when it is legal to own semis ? what ?	chwyvkk	politics	2,014	well ya , why would manufacturers do what they did in the past when it is legal to own semis ? what ?	well ya , why would manufacturers do what they did in the past when it is legal to own semis ? what ?	well ya , why would manufacturers do what they did in the past when it is legal to own semis ? what ?	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "well", "ya", ",", "why", "would", "manufacturers", "do", "what", "they", "did", "in", "the", "past", "when", "it", "is", "legal", "to", "own", "semis", "?", "what", "?" ]
they react emotionally to the news reports popping up every single day of police abusing citizens and abusing the law . it happens consistently , as reported by many news agencies . you may single out the few that act as if the police as a whole are a terror upon our country , but most people are n't arguing that . they are reacting to an extremely large amount of events that have happened nation wide , of illegal actions taken by police , reported all the time , and then expressing disgust because the proper course of law is not applied . edit i need to leave , so if you have a retort , make sure you keep up with the logic , and be sure to mention you 're an engineer to gain some extra authority in the matter .	cgzu5qx	politics	2,014	they react emotionally to the news reports popping up every single day of @@police## abusing citizens and abusing the law . it happens consistently , as reported by many news agencies . you may single out the few that act as if the @@police## as a whole are a terror upon our country , but most people are n't arguing that . they are reacting to an extremely large amount of events that have happened nation wide , of illegal actions taken by @@police## , reported all the time , and then expressing disgust because the proper course of law is not applied . edit i need to leave , so if you have a retort , make sure you keep up with the logic , and be sure to mention you 're an engineer to gain some extra authority in the matter .	they react emotionally to the news reports popping up every single day of @@police## abusing citizens and abusing the law . it happens consistently , as reported by many @@news agencies## . you may single out the few that act as if the @@police## as a whole are a terror upon our country , but most people are n't arguing that . they are reacting to an extremely large amount of events that have happened nation wide , of illegal actions taken by @@police## , reported all the time , and then expressing disgust because the proper course of law is not applied . edit i need to leave , so if you have a retort , make sure you keep up with the logic , and be sure to mention you 're an engineer to gain some extra authority in the matter .	they react emotionally to the news reports popping up every single day of @@police## abusing citizens and abusing the law . it happens consistently , as reported by many @@news agencies## . you may single out the few that act as if the @@police## as a whole are a terror upon our country , but most people are n't arguing that . they are reacting to an extremely large amount of events that have happened nation wide , of illegal actions taken by @@police## , reported all the time , and then expressing disgust because the proper course of law is not applied . edit i need to leave , so if you have a retort , make sure you keep up with the logic , and be sure to mention you 're an engineer to gain some extra authority in the matter .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "they", "react", "emotionally", "to", "the", "news", "reports", "popping", "up", "every", "single", "day", "of", "police", "abusing", "citizens", "and", "abusing", "the", "law", ".", "it", "happens", "consistently", ",", "as", "reported", "by", "many", "news", "agencies", ".", "you", "may", "single", "out", "the", "few", "that", "act", "as", "if", "the", "police", "as", "a", "whole", "are", "a", "terror", "upon", "our", "country", ",", "but", "most", "people", "are", "n't", "arguing", "that", ".", "they", "are", "reacting", "to", "an", "extremely", "large", "amount", "of", "events", "that", "have", "happened", "nation", "wide", ",", "of", "illegal", "actions", "taken", "by", "police", ",", "reported", "all", "the", "time", ",", "and", "then", "expressing", "disgust", "because", "the", "proper", "course", "of", "law", "is", "not", "applied", ".", "edit", "i", "need", "to", "leave", ",", "so", "if", "you", "have", "a", "retort", ",", "make", "sure", "you", "keep", "up", "with", "the", "logic", ",", "and", "be", "sure", "to", "mention", "you", "'re", "an", "engineer", "to", "gain", "some", "extra", "authority", "in", "the", "matter", "." ]
nevermind that many people on the lower rungs already work 23 jobs , no , what they need are more jobs ! ... yet in the unemployment benefit debate there 's apparently 100 applicants for every job and nobody can get one even if they wanted ... which of these is true ? that the lower rung is working 23 jobs or that they ca n't get jobs ? yes i 'm aware they 're not completely mutually exclusive , but we 're clearly talking about a majority here	cfmid4w	politics	2,014	nevermind that many @@people on the lower rungs## already work 23 jobs , no , what they need are more jobs ! ... yet in the unemployment benefit debate there 's apparently 100 applicants for every job and nobody can get one even if they wanted ... which of these is true ? that the lower rung is working 23 jobs or that they ca n't get jobs ? yes i 'm aware they 're not completely mutually exclusive , but we 're clearly talking about a majority here	nevermind that many people on the lower rungs already work 23 jobs , no , what they need are more jobs ! ... yet in the unemployment benefit debate there 's apparently 100 applicants for every job and nobody can get one even if they wanted ... which of these is true ? that the lower rung is working 23 jobs or that they ca n't get jobs ? yes i 'm aware they 're not completely mutually exclusive , but we 're clearly talking about a majority here	nevermind that many people on the lower rungs already work 23 jobs , no , what they need are more jobs ! ... yet in the unemployment benefit debate there 's apparently 100 applicants for every job and nobody can get one even if they wanted ... which of these is true ? that the lower rung is working 23 jobs or that they ca n't get jobs ? yes i 'm aware they 're not completely mutually exclusive , but we 're clearly talking about a majority here	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "nevermind", "that", "many", "people", "on", "the", "lower", "rungs", "already", "work", "23", "jobs", ",", "no", ",", "what", "they", "need", "are", "more", "jobs", "!", "...", "yet", "in", "the", "unemployment", "benefit", "debate", "there", "'s", "apparently", "100", "applicants", "for", "every", "job", "and", "nobody", "can", "get", "one", "even", "if", "they", "wanted", "...", "which", "of", "these", "is", "true", "?", "that", "the", "lower", "rung", "is", "working", "23", "jobs", "or", "that", "they", "ca", "n't", "get", "jobs", "?", "yes", "i", "'m", "aware", "they", "'re", "not", "completely", "mutually", "exclusive", ",", "but", "we", "'re", "clearly", "talking", "about", "a", "majority", "here" ]
the only people who like obamacare are getting subsidies for it . with the united states 18 trillion dollars in debt ... you do realize this wo n't last	cmz9kmf	politics	2,014	the only people who like obamacare are getting subsidies for it . with the united states 18 trillion dollars in debt ... you do realize this wo n't last	the only people who like obamacare are getting subsidies for it . with @@the united states## 18 trillion dollars in debt ... you do realize this wo n't last	the only people who like obamacare are getting subsidies for it . with @@the united states## 18 trillion dollars in debt ... you do realize this wo n't last	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "the", "only", "people", "who", "like", "obamacare", "are", "getting", "subsidies", "for", "it", ".", "with", "the", "united", "states", "18", "trillion", "dollars", "in", "debt", "...", "you", "do", "realize", "this", "wo", "n't", "last" ]
the point i was bringing up was systemic differences in treatment , something born out by black americans getting far longer sentences for the same crimes . shortsightedness , ignorance , and inappropriate use of statistics are the root cause of this claim . a criminal justice system that favors the wealthy , and a correlation of african americans and income inequality , are the culprit . that does n't have shit to do with people resisting arrest and forcing police officers hands , by the way .	cn2wj1v	politics	2,014	the point i was bringing up was systemic differences in treatment , something born out by @@black americans## getting far longer sentences for the same crimes . shortsightedness , ignorance , and inappropriate use of statistics are the root cause of this claim . a criminal justice system that favors @@the wealthy## , and a correlation of @@african americans## and income inequality , are the culprit . that does n't have shit to do with people resisting arrest and forcing @@police officers## hands , by the way .	the point i was bringing up was systemic differences in treatment , something born out by @@black americans## getting far longer sentences for the same crimes . shortsightedness , ignorance , and inappropriate use of statistics are the root cause of this claim . a criminal justice system that favors the wealthy , and a correlation of @@african americans## and income inequality , are the culprit . that does n't have shit to do with @@people resisting arrest## and forcing @@police officers## hands , by the way .	the point i was bringing up was systemic differences in treatment , something born out by @@black americans## getting far longer sentences for the same crimes . shortsightedness , ignorance , and inappropriate use of statistics are the root cause of this claim . a criminal justice system that favors the wealthy , and a correlation of @@african americans## and income inequality , are the culprit . that does n't have shit to do with @@people resisting arrest## and forcing @@police officers## hands , by the way .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "the", "point", "i", "was", "bringing", "up", "was", "systemic", "differences", "in", "treatment", ",", "something", "born", "out", "by", "black", "americans", "getting", "far", "longer", "sentences", "for", "the", "same", "crimes", ".", "shortsightedness", ",", "ignorance", ",", "and", "inappropriate", "use", "of", "statistics", "are", "the", "root", "cause", "of", "this", "claim", ".", "a", "criminal", "justice", "system", "that", "favors", "the", "wealthy", ",", "and", "a", "correlation", "of", "african", "americans", "and", "income", "inequality", ",", "are", "the", "culprit", ".", "that", "does", "n't", "have", "shit", "to", "do", "with", "people", "resisting", "arrest", "and", "forcing", "police", "officers", "hands", ",", "by", "the", "way", "." ]
are you like 15 ? your idealistic dreams of how things work seem a bit off	chduasz	politics	2,014	are you like 15 ? your idealistic dreams of how things work seem a bit off	are you like 15 ? your idealistic dreams of how things work seem a bit off	are you like 15 ? your idealistic dreams of how things work seem a bit off	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "are", "you", "like", "15", "?", "your", "idealistic", "dreams", "of", "how", "things", "work", "seem", "a", "bit", "off" ]
pennsylvania has never been a key state . republicans have n't come close to winning pennsylvania since 1988. of those states , north carolina is the most key because it 's the only one that changed in 2012. black turnout was n't historic for obama . it 's been over 85 for every democrat from dukakis to obama , possibly even over 90. hispanic turnout was much higher for obama than gore and it is only rising . democrats win florida with the hispanic voting and that 's all they need . democrats have several more paths to victory than republicans .	clte5vk	politics	2,014	pennsylvania has never been a key state . @@republicans## have n't come close to winning pennsylvania since 1988. of those states , north carolina is the most key because it 's the only one that changed in 2012. black turnout was n't historic for obama . it 's been over 85 for every democrat from dukakis to obama , possibly even over 90. hispanic turnout was much higher for obama than gore and it is only rising . @@democrats## win florida with the hispanic voting and that 's all they need . @@democrats## have several more paths to victory than @@republicans## .	@@pennsylvania## has never been a key state . @@republicans## have n't come close to winning @@pennsylvania## since 1988. of those states , @@north carolina## is the most key because it 's the only one that changed in 2012. black turnout was n't historic for obama . it 's been over 85 for every democrat from dukakis to obama , possibly even over 90. hispanic turnout was much higher for obama than gore and it is only rising . @@democrats## win florida with the hispanic voting and that 's all they need . @@democrats## have several more paths to victory than @@republicans## .	pennsylvania has never been a key state . @@republicans## have n't come close to winning pennsylvania since 1988. of those states , north carolina is the most key because it 's the only one that changed in 2012. black turnout was n't historic for obama . it 's been over 85 for every democrat from dukakis to obama , possibly even over 90. hispanic turnout was much higher for obama than gore and it is only rising . @@democrats## win florida with the hispanic voting and that 's all they need . @@democrats## have several more paths to victory than @@republicans## .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0 ]	[ "pennsylvania", "has", "never", "been", "a", "key", "state", ".", "republicans", "have", "n't", "come", "close", "to", "winning", "pennsylvania", "since", "1988.", "of", "those", "states", ",", "north", "carolina", "is", "the", "most", "key", "because", "it", "'s", "the", "only", "one", "that", "changed", "in", "2012.", "black", "turnout", "was", "n't", "historic", "for", "obama", ".", "it", "'s", "been", "over", "85", "for", "every", "democrat", "from", "dukakis", "to", "obama", ",", "possibly", "even", "over", "90.", "hispanic", "turnout", "was", "much", "higher", "for", "obama", "than", "gore", "and", "it", "is", "only", "rising", ".", "democrats", "win", "florida", "with", "the", "hispanic", "voting", "and", "that", "'s", "all", "they", "need", ".", "democrats", "have", "several", "more", "paths", "to", "victory", "than", "republicans", "." ]
money is powerful , but not compared to political will . once it 's legalized in enough states it will reach a tipping point where all the funding in the world wo n't stop it . once it 's seen as common sense the lobbyists lose all power .	cirip1x	politics	2,014	money is powerful , but not compared to political will . once it 's legalized in enough states it will reach a tipping point where all the funding in the world wo n't stop it . once it 's seen as common sense the @@lobbyists## lose all power .	money is powerful , but not compared to political will . once it 's legalized in enough states it will reach a tipping point where all the funding in the world wo n't stop it . once it 's seen as common sense the @@lobbyists## lose all power .	money is powerful , but not compared to political will . once it 's legalized in enough states it will reach a tipping point where all the funding in the world wo n't stop it . once it 's seen as common sense the @@lobbyists## lose all power .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "money", "is", "powerful", ",", "but", "not", "compared", "to", "political", "will", ".", "once", "it", "'s", "legalized", "in", "enough", "states", "it", "will", "reach", "a", "tipping", "point", "where", "all", "the", "funding", "in", "the", "world", "wo", "n't", "stop", "it", ".", "once", "it", "'s", "seen", "as", "common", "sense", "the", "lobbyists", "lose", "all", "power", "." ]
not the way you describe it . but i see no possible explanation for the iraq war other than private corporations driving wars '' . let 's go over it ? the us government has had a history of freetrade promotion leading to democracies eventually . '' the iraq war could have been revenge for bush 's father . the iraq war could have been an easy target , to send a message to wouldbe dictators that the us is the superpower . they chose iraq because they 've invaded it before and it 's an easy target . the iraq war could have been for freeing up trade in the area . the iraq war could have been establishing another democracy at the doorstep of iran . another strategic base to put pressure on iran . the iraq war could have been incompetent analysis of data . where svr was able to trick western analysts into thinking that saddam and aq were working together . the iraq war could have been about a planned attempt to modernize the middle east and to remove dictatorships and other unfriendly governments from the area . there 's tons of plausible theories that do n't involve corporations . various rich people richer shareholders in big oil , halliburton , et al . , except the fact that the oil fields are now owned by shell and china . so ... it does n't make much sense . even though there was zero evidence that saddam hussein had anything to do with osama bin laden specifically or alqaeda generally yes you are right . but how do you know there was n't a mistake . or how do you know that maybe saddam did work with aq but then stopped completely leading to trails of clues but not enough for anyone to argue publicly that there is a clear link . i remember the day of 911 . on that day , people came up to me and said i bet you it 's saddam . saddam has attacked us . '' this made me wonder . i never even thought of saddam at that moment . but why did so many americans believe saddam had something to do with it . probably because saddam and the us fought before recently , and this may have something to do with it . but it 's pretty clear he had no connection to 911 . so if you think the iraq war or , for that matter , the vietnam war was n't primarily driven by greed , or was n't part of eisenhower 's warning , then i 'd like to hear why you think that . it was n't at all related or driven by greed . iraq war , an argument could be made about it , but there 's no solid evidence . i will often see the same content , word for word , on my local newspaper , on national newspapers , on local news channels , on cable news channels , and online because a lot of sources uses the ap as the official news agency . but some of it is sheer laziness . so you already figured it out . then why are you making complicated conspiracy theories ? that you can explain by incompetence and laziness ? sometimes it 's not sinister plots sometimes it 's just stupidity or laziness . hey have to give the appearance of fairness between both sides of an issue '' you identified another problem . but that 's the problem with journalism , not americans . europeans do the same shit . i cut my teeth on watergate and wondered if all reporters were like woodward and bernstein . sadly , that 's certainly not the case now if it ever was hell , lately , i do n't think woodward and bernstein are like woodward and bernstein were . or maybe you are just more skewed into a radical spectrum than how woodward and bernstein were '' at the time . that just about every political decision on a national level , many or most decisions on a state level , and a startlingly large number of decisions at a countymunicipal level , are made on the basis of greed . but how do you know ? there can be many correlations made between successURL and actions in the past . you ca n't always call them causation '' and imply there was greed motivation involved . sometimes even greedy people do the right thing based on ideology . sometimes ideologues do the wrong thing based on greed . in some cases , even if it was all about greed . what 's the harm ? then someone who has more money should come and fix the situation . plenty of good minded individuals like bill gates or warren buffett exist . why do n't they take advantage like the koch brothers and sheldon adelson ? and if they do n't take advantage out of principle , then maybe they deserve to lose for not being superior in the game of politics . is the same answer deep throat '' gave to woodward and bernstein follow the money . '' sometimes it 's not all about the money . koch brothers are rich , but they do n't do all they do just because of money . they are politically motivated . they have beliefs . beliefs are what motivates everything in the world .	cgj8yyl	politics	2,014	not the way you describe it . but i see no possible explanation for the iraq war other than private corporations driving wars '' . let 's go over it ? the @@us government## has had a history of freetrade promotion leading to democracies eventually . '' the iraq war could have been revenge for bush 's father . the iraq war could have been an easy target , to send a message to @@wouldbe dictators## that the us is the superpower . they chose iraq because they 've invaded it before and it 's an easy target . the iraq war could have been for freeing up trade in the area . the iraq war could have been establishing another democracy at the doorstep of iran . another strategic base to put pressure on @@iran## . the iraq war could have been incompetent analysis of data . where svr was able to trick @@western analysts## into thinking that saddam and @@aq## were working together . the iraq war could have been about a planned attempt to modernize the middle east and to remove dictatorships and other unfriendly governments from the area . there 's tons of plausible theories that do n't involve corporations . various @@rich people## @@richer shareholders in big oil## , halliburton , et al . , except the fact that the oil fields are now owned by shell and china . so ... it does n't make much sense . even though there was zero evidence that saddam hussein had anything to do with osama bin laden specifically or @@alqaeda## generally yes you are right . but how do you know there was n't a mistake . or how do you know that maybe saddam did work with @@aq## but then stopped completely leading to trails of clues but not enough for anyone to argue publicly that there is a clear link . i remember the day of 911 . on that day , people came up to me and said i bet you it 's saddam . saddam has attacked us . '' this made me wonder . i never even thought of saddam at that moment . but why did so many @@americans## believe saddam had something to do with it . probably because saddam and @@the us## fought before recently , and this may have something to do with it . but it 's pretty clear he had no connection to 911 . so if you think the iraq war or , for that matter , the vietnam war was n't primarily driven by greed , or was n't part of eisenhower 's warning , then i 'd like to hear why you think that . it was n't at all related or driven by greed . iraq war , an argument could be made about it , but there 's no solid evidence . i will often see the same content , word for word , on my local newspaper , on national newspapers , on local news channels , on cable news channels , and online because a lot of sources uses the ap as the official news agency . but some of it is sheer laziness . so you already figured it out . then why are you making complicated conspiracy theories ? that you can explain by incompetence and laziness ? sometimes it 's not sinister plots sometimes it 's just stupidity or laziness . hey have to give the appearance of fairness between both sides of an issue '' you identified another problem . but that 's the problem with journalism , not @@americans## . @@europeans## do the same shit . i cut my teeth on watergate and wondered if all @@reporters## were like woodward and bernstein . sadly , that 's certainly not the case now if it ever was hell , lately , i do n't think woodward and bernstein are like woodward and bernstein were . or maybe you are just more skewed into a radical spectrum than how woodward and bernstein were '' at the time . that just about every political decision on a national level , many or most decisions on a state level , and a startlingly large number of decisions at a countymunicipal level , are made on the basis of greed . but how do you know ? there can be many correlations made between successURL and actions in the past . you ca n't always call them causation '' and imply there was greed motivation involved . sometimes even greedy people do the right thing based on ideology . sometimes ideologues do the wrong thing based on greed . in some cases , even if it was all about greed . what 's the harm ? then someone who has more money should come and fix the situation . plenty of good minded individuals like bill gates or warren buffett exist . why do n't they take advantage like the koch brothers and sheldon adelson ? and if they do n't take advantage out of principle , then maybe they deserve to lose for not being superior in the game of politics . is the same answer deep throat '' gave to woodward and bernstein follow the money . '' sometimes it 's not all about the money . koch brothers are rich , but they do n't do all they do just because of money . they are politically motivated . they have beliefs . beliefs are what motivates everything in the world .	not the way you describe it . but i see no possible explanation for the iraq war other than @@private corporations## driving wars '' . let 's go over it ? @@the us government## has had a history of freetrade promotion leading to democracies eventually . '' the iraq war could have been revenge for bush 's father . the iraq war could have been an easy target , to send a message to @@wouldbe dictators## that @@the us## is the superpower . they chose @@iraq## because they 've invaded it before and it 's an easy target . the iraq war could have been for freeing up trade in the area . the iraq war could have been establishing another democracy at the doorstep of iran . another strategic base to put pressure on @@iran## . the iraq war could have been incompetent analysis of data . where @@svr## was able to trick @@western analysts## into thinking that saddam and @@aq## were working together . the iraq war could have been about a planned attempt to modernize @@the middle east## and to remove dictatorships and other @@unfriendly governments## from the area . there 's tons of plausible theories that do n't involve corporations . various @@rich people## @@richer shareholders in big oil## , @@halliburton## , et al . , except the fact that the oil fields are now owned by @@shell## and @@china## . so ... it does n't make much sense . even though there was zero evidence that saddam hussein had anything to do with osama bin laden specifically or @@alqaeda## generally yes you are right . but how do you know there was n't a mistake . or how do you know that maybe saddam did work with @@aq## but then stopped completely leading to trails of clues but not enough for anyone to argue publicly that there is a clear link . i remember the day of 911 . on that day , people came up to me and said i bet you it 's saddam . saddam has attacked us . '' this made me wonder . i never even thought of saddam at that moment . but why did so many @@americans## believe saddam had something to do with it . probably because saddam and @@the us## fought before recently , and this may have something to do with it . but it 's pretty clear he had no connection to 911 . so if you think the iraq war or , for that matter , the vietnam war was n't primarily driven by greed , or was n't part of eisenhower 's warning , then i 'd like to hear why you think that . it was n't at all related or driven by greed . iraq war , an argument could be made about it , but there 's no solid evidence . i will often see the same content , word for word , on my local newspaper , on national newspapers , on local news channels , on cable news channels , and online because a lot of sources uses the @@ap## as the official news agency . but some of it is sheer laziness . so you already figured it out . then why are you making complicated conspiracy theories ? that you can explain by incompetence and laziness ? sometimes it 's not sinister plots sometimes it 's just stupidity or laziness . hey have to give the appearance of fairness between both sides of an issue '' you identified another problem . but that 's the problem with journalism , not @@americans## . @@europeans## do the same shit . i cut my teeth on watergate and wondered if all @@reporters## were like woodward and bernstein . sadly , that 's certainly not the case now if it ever was hell , lately , i do n't think woodward and bernstein are like woodward and bernstein were . or maybe you are just more skewed into a radical spectrum than how woodward and bernstein were '' at the time . that just about every political decision on a national level , many or most decisions on a state level , and a startlingly large number of decisions at a countymunicipal level , are made on the basis of greed . but how do you know ? there can be many correlations made between successURL and actions in the past . you ca n't always call them causation '' and imply there was greed motivation involved . sometimes even @@greedy people## do the right thing based on ideology . sometimes ideologues do the wrong thing based on greed . in some cases , even if it was all about greed . what 's the harm ? then someone who has more money should come and fix the situation . plenty of @@good minded individuals## like bill gates or warren buffett exist . why do n't they take advantage like the @@koch brothers## and sheldon adelson ? and if they do n't take advantage out of principle , then maybe they deserve to lose for not being superior in the game of politics . is the same answer deep throat '' gave to woodward and bernstein follow the money . '' sometimes it 's not all about the money . @@koch brothers## are rich , but they do n't do all they do just because of money . they are politically motivated . they have beliefs . beliefs are what motivates everything in the world .	not the way you describe it . but i see no possible explanation for the iraq war other than private corporations driving wars '' . let 's go over it ? @@the us government## has had a history of freetrade promotion leading to democracies eventually . '' the iraq war could have been revenge for bush 's father . the iraq war could have been an easy target , to send a message to @@wouldbe dictators## that @@the us## is the superpower . they chose @@iraq## because they 've invaded it before and it 's an easy target . the iraq war could have been for freeing up trade in the area . the iraq war could have been establishing another democracy at the doorstep of iran . another strategic base to put pressure on @@iran## . the iraq war could have been incompetent analysis of data . where @@svr## was able to trick @@western analysts## into thinking that saddam and @@aq## were working together . the iraq war could have been about a planned attempt to modernize @@the middle east## and to remove dictatorships and other @@unfriendly governments## from the area . there 's tons of plausible theories that do n't involve corporations . various @@rich people## @@richer shareholders in big oil## , @@halliburton## , et al . , except the fact that the oil fields are now owned by @@shell## and @@china## . so ... it does n't make much sense . even though there was zero evidence that saddam hussein had anything to do with osama bin laden specifically or @@alqaeda## generally yes you are right . but how do you know there was n't a mistake . or how do you know that maybe saddam did work with @@aq## but then stopped completely leading to trails of clues but not enough for anyone to argue publicly that there is a clear link . i remember the day of 911 . on that day , people came up to me and said i bet you it 's saddam . saddam has attacked us . '' this made me wonder . i never even thought of saddam at that moment . but why did so many @@americans## believe saddam had something to do with it . probably because saddam and @@the us## fought before recently , and this may have something to do with it . but it 's pretty clear he had no connection to 911 . so if you think the iraq war or , for that matter , the vietnam war was n't primarily driven by greed , or was n't part of eisenhower 's warning , then i 'd like to hear why you think that . it was n't at all related or driven by greed . iraq war , an argument could be made about it , but there 's no solid evidence . i will often see the same content , word for word , on my local newspaper , on national newspapers , on local news channels , on cable news channels , and online because a lot of sources uses the @@ap## as the official news agency . but some of it is sheer laziness . so you already figured it out . then why are you making complicated conspiracy theories ? that you can explain by incompetence and laziness ? sometimes it 's not sinister plots sometimes it 's just stupidity or laziness . hey have to give the appearance of fairness between both sides of an issue '' you identified another problem . but that 's the problem with journalism , not @@americans## . @@europeans## do the same shit . i cut my teeth on watergate and wondered if all @@reporters## were like woodward and bernstein . sadly , that 's certainly not the case now if it ever was hell , lately , i do n't think woodward and bernstein are like woodward and bernstein were . or maybe you are just more skewed into a radical spectrum than how woodward and bernstein were '' at the time . that just about every political decision on a national level , many or most decisions on a state level , and a startlingly large number of decisions at a countymunicipal level , are made on the basis of greed . but how do you know ? there can be many correlations made between successURL and actions in the past . you ca n't always call them causation '' and imply there was greed motivation involved . sometimes even @@greedy people## do the right thing based on ideology . sometimes ideologues do the wrong thing based on greed . in some cases , even if it was all about greed . what 's the harm ? then someone who has more money should come and fix the situation . plenty of @@good minded individuals## like bill gates or warren buffett exist . why do n't they take advantage like the @@koch brothers## and sheldon adelson ? and if they do n't take advantage out of principle , then maybe they deserve to lose for not being superior in the game of politics . is the same answer deep throat '' gave to woodward and bernstein follow the money . '' sometimes it 's not all about the money . @@koch brothers## are rich , but they do n't do all they do just because of money . they are politically motivated . they have beliefs . beliefs are what motivates everything in the world .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "B", "I", "I", "I", "I", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "not", "the", "way", "you", "describe", "it", ".", "but", "i", "see", "no", "possible", "explanation", "for", "the", "iraq", "war", "other", "than", "private", "corporations", "driving", "wars", "``", ".", "let", "'s", "go", "over", "it", "?", "the", "us", "government", "has", "had", "a", "history", "of", "freetrade", "promotion", "leading", "to", "democracies", "eventually", ".", "``", "the", "iraq", "war", "could", "have", "been", "revenge", "for", "bush", "'s", "father", ".", "the", "iraq", "war", "could", "have", "been", "an", "easy", "target", ",", "to", "send", "a", "message", "to", "wouldbe", "dictators", "that", "the", "us", "is", "the", "superpower", ".", "they", "chose", "iraq", "because", "they", "'ve", "invaded", "it", "before", "and", "it", "'s", "an", "easy", "target", ".", "the", "iraq", "war", "could", "have", "been", "for", "freeing", "up", "trade", "in", "the", "area", ".", "the", "iraq", "war", "could", "have", "been", "establishing", "another", "democracy", "at", "the", "doorstep", "of", "iran", ".", "another", "strategic", "base", "to", "put", "pressure", "on", "iran", ".", "the", "iraq", "war", "could", "have", "been", "incompetent", "analysis", "of", "data", ".", "where", "svr", "was", "able", "to", "trick", "western", "analysts", "into", "thinking", "that", "saddam", "and", "aq", "were", "working", "together", ".", "the", "iraq", "war", "could", "have", "been", "about", "a", "planned", "attempt", "to", "modernize", "the", "middle", "east", "and", "to", "remove", "dictatorships", "and", "other", "unfriendly", "governments", "from", "the", "area", ".", "there", "'s", "tons", "of", "plausible", "theories", "that", "do", "n't", "involve", "corporations", ".", "various", "rich", "people", "richer", "shareholders", "in", "big", "oil", ",", "halliburton", ",", "et", "al", ".", ",", "except", "the", "fact", "that", "the", "oil", "fields", "are", "now", "owned", "by", "shell", "and", "china", ".", "so", "...", "it", "does", "n't", "make", "much", "sense", ".", "even", "though", "there", "was", "zero", "evidence", "that", "saddam", "hussein", "had", "anything", "to", "do", "with", "osama", "bin", "laden", "specifically", "or", "alqaeda", "generally", "yes", "you", "are", "right", ".", "but", "how", "do", "you", "know", "there", "was", "n't", "a", "mistake", ".", "or", "how", "do", "you", "know", "that", "maybe", "saddam", "did", "work", "with", "aq", "but", "then", "stopped", "completely", "leading", "to", "trails", "of", "clues", "but", "not", "enough", "for", "anyone", "to", "argue", "publicly", "that", "there", "is", "a", "clear", "link", ".", "i", "remember", "the", "day", "of", "911", ".", "on", "that", "day", ",", "people", "came", "up", "to", "me", "and", "said", "i", "bet", "you", "it", "'s", "saddam", ".", "saddam", "has", "attacked", "us", ".", "``", "this", "made", "me", "wonder", ".", "i", "never", "even", "thought", "of", "saddam", "at", "that", "moment", ".", "but", "why", "did", "so", "many", "americans", "believe", "saddam", "had", "something", "to", "do", "with", "it", ".", "probably", "because", "saddam", "and", "the", "us", "fought", "before", "recently", ",", "and", "this", "may", "have", "something", "to", "do", "with", "it", ".", "but", "it", "'s", "pretty", "clear", "he", "had", "no", "connection", "to", "911", ".", "so", "if", "you", "think", "the", "iraq", "war", "or", ",", "for", "that", "matter", ",", "the", "vietnam", "war", "was", "n't", "primarily", "driven", "by", "greed", ",", "or", "was", "n't", "part", "of", "eisenhower", "'s", "warning", ",", "then", "i", "'d", "like", "to", "hear", "why", "you", "think", "that", ".", "it", "was", "n't", "at", "all", "related", "or", "driven", "by", "greed", ".", "iraq", "war", ",", "an", "argument", "could", "be", "made", "about", "it", ",", "but", "there", "'s", "no", "solid", "evidence", ".", "i", "will", "often", "see", "the", "same", "content", ",", "word", "for", "word", ",", "on", "my", "local", "newspaper", ",", "on", "national", "newspapers", ",", "on", "local", "news", "channels", ",", "on", "cable", "news", "channels", ",", "and", "online", "because", "a", "lot", "of", "sources", "uses", "the", "ap", "as", "the", "official", "news", "agency", ".", "but", "some", "of", "it", "is", "sheer", "laziness", ".", "so", "you", "already", "figured", "it", "out", ".", "then", "why", "are", "you", "making", "complicated", "conspiracy", "theories", "?", "that", "you", "can", "explain", "by", "incompetence", "and", "laziness", "?", "sometimes", "it", "'s", "not", "sinister", "plots", "sometimes", "it", "'s", "just", "stupidity", "or", "laziness", ".", "hey", "have", "to", "give", "the", "appearance", "of", "fairness", "between", "both", "sides", "of", "an", "issue", "``", "you", "identified", "another", "problem", ".", "but", "that", "'s", "the", "problem", "with", "journalism", ",", "not", "americans", ".", "europeans", "do", "the", "same", "shit", ".", "i", "cut", "my", "teeth", "on", "watergate", "and", "wondered", "if", "all", "reporters", "were", "like", "woodward", "and", "bernstein", ".", "sadly", ",", "that", "'s", "certainly", "not", "the", "case", "now", "if", "it", "ever", "was", "hell", ",", "lately", ",", "i", "do", "n't", "think", "woodward", "and", "bernstein", "are", "like", "woodward", "and", "bernstein", "were", ".", "or", "maybe", "you", "are", "just", "more", "skewed", "into", "a", "radical", "spectrum", "than", "how", "woodward", "and", "bernstein", "were", "``", "at", "the", "time", ".", "that", "just", "about", "every", "political", "decision", "on", "a", "national", "level", ",", "many", "or", "most", "decisions", "on", "a", "state", "level", ",", "and", "a", "startlingly", "large", "number", "of", "decisions", "at", "a", "countymunicipal", "level", ",", "are", "made", "on", "the", "basis", "of", "greed", ".", "but", "how", "do", "you", "know", "?", "there", "can", "be", "many", "correlations", "made", "between", "successURL", "and", "actions", "in", "the", "past", ".", "you", "ca", "n't", "always", "call", "them", "causation", "``", "and", "imply", "there", "was", "greed", "motivation", "involved", ".", "sometimes", "even", "greedy", "people", "do", "the", "right", "thing", "based", "on", "ideology", ".", "sometimes", "ideologues", "do", "the", "wrong", "thing", "based", "on", "greed", ".", "in", "some", "cases", ",", "even", "if", "it", "was", "all", "about", "greed", ".", "what", "'s", "the", "harm", "?", "then", "someone", "who", "has", "more", "money", "should", "come", "and", "fix", "the", "situation", ".", "plenty", "of", "good", "minded", "individuals", "like", "bill", "gates", "or", "warren", "buffett", "exist", ".", "why", "do", "n't", "they", "take", "advantage", "like", "the", "koch", "brothers", "and", "sheldon", "adelson", "?", "and", "if", "they", "do", "n't", "take", "advantage", "out", "of", "principle", ",", "then", "maybe", "they", "deserve", "to", "lose", "for", "not", "being", "superior", "in", "the", "game", "of", "politics", ".", "is", "the", "same", "answer", "deep", "throat", "``", "gave", "to", "woodward", "and", "bernstein", "follow", "the", "money", ".", "``", "sometimes", "it", "'s", "not", "all", "about", "the", "money", ".", "koch", "brothers", "are", "rich", ",", "but", "they", "do", "n't", "do", "all", "they", "do", "just", "because", "of", "money", ".", "they", "are", "politically", "motivated", ".", "they", "have", "beliefs", ".", "beliefs", "are", "what", "motivates", "everything", "in", "the", "world", "." ]
until recently i was the qa director for a small educational software shop and i think i have an answer for that because we do n't know . i 've listed jobs and had 12 viable candidates in a week and hired within 2. other times i 've had to ease through dozens of prequalified resumes , done dozens of phone interviews and ended up settling for someone who wasnt great because of project need ... it hurt more to have an empty role and be burning my own time than it did to get someone on board who was not a great fit . so how long a job will run depends on who applies and how fast .	ci2ggh5	politics	2,014	until recently i was the qa director for a small educational software shop and i think i have an answer for that because we do n't know . i 've listed jobs and had 12 viable candidates in a week and hired within 2. other times i 've had to ease through dozens of prequalified resumes , done dozens of phone interviews and ended up settling for someone who wasnt great because of project need ... it hurt more to have an empty role and be burning my own time than it did to get someone on board who was not a great fit . so how long a job will run depends on who applies and how fast .	until recently i was the qa director for a small educational software shop and i think i have an answer for that because we do n't know . i 've listed jobs and had 12 @@viable candidates## in a week and hired within 2. other times i 've had to ease through dozens of prequalified resumes , done dozens of phone interviews and ended up settling for someone who wasnt great because of project need ... it hurt more to have an empty role and be burning my own time than it did to get someone on board who was not a great fit . so how long a job will run depends on who applies and how fast .	until recently i was the qa director for a small educational software shop and i think i have an answer for that because we do n't know . i 've listed jobs and had 12 @@viable candidates## in a week and hired within 2. other times i 've had to ease through dozens of prequalified resumes , done dozens of phone interviews and ended up settling for someone who wasnt great because of project need ... it hurt more to have an empty role and be burning my own time than it did to get someone on board who was not a great fit . so how long a job will run depends on who applies and how fast .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "until", "recently", "i", "was", "the", "qa", "director", "for", "a", "small", "educational", "software", "shop", "and", "i", "think", "i", "have", "an", "answer", "for", "that", "because", "we", "do", "n't", "know", ".", "i", "'ve", "listed", "jobs", "and", "had", "12", "viable", "candidates", "in", "a", "week", "and", "hired", "within", "2.", "other", "times", "i", "'ve", "had", "to", "ease", "through", "dozens", "of", "prequalified", "resumes", ",", "done", "dozens", "of", "phone", "interviews", "and", "ended", "up", "settling", "for", "someone", "who", "wasnt", "great", "because", "of", "project", "need", "...", "it", "hurt", "more", "to", "have", "an", "empty", "role", "and", "be", "burning", "my", "own", "time", "than", "it", "did", "to", "get", "someone", "on", "board", "who", "was", "not", "a", "great", "fit", ".", "so", "how", "long", "a", "job", "will", "run", "depends", "on", "who", "applies", "and", "how", "fast", "." ]
self employed means he goes under the table sir ? ! are you suggesting that all self employed entrepreneurs are tax cheats ? are you some sort of communists ? better dead than red i always say .	cm8v0nw	politics	2,014	self employed means he goes under the table sir ? ! are you suggesting that all @@self employed entrepreneurs## are tax cheats ? are you some sort of @@communists## ? better dead than red i always say .	self employed means he goes under the table sir ? ! are you suggesting that all @@self employed entrepreneurs## are tax cheats ? are you some sort of communists ? better dead than red i always say .	self employed means he goes under the table sir ? ! are you suggesting that all @@self employed entrepreneurs## are tax cheats ? are you some sort of communists ? better dead than red i always say .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "self", "employed", "means", "he", "goes", "under", "the", "table", "sir", "?", "!", "are", "you", "suggesting", "that", "all", "self", "employed", "entrepreneurs", "are", "tax", "cheats", "?", "are", "you", "some", "sort", "of", "communists", "?", "better", "dead", "than", "red", "i", "always", "say", "." ]
i proposed to get money out of politics . you said why bother , let 's go libertarian . now i explained you why getting money out of politics is better than libertarianism . and now you tell me that we have an issue because we have money in politics ? really ? you really did n't . you explained that it can be done . i never really refuted that . i asked why its better to use a state that always reverts back to protecting the oligarchy once you stop looking which people do every time , because they are under the false impression that they can . this entire paragraph is exactly why libertarianism is total bs . it 's the naive idea that collective willpower somehow overcomes the laws of economy that have established over millenia . that somehow , a hivemind will form that will reject morally bad companies even if they make the cheaper offer . you could not say a more ironic thing as someone who supports the use of a compulsory state . any change you want to effect through government happens on a cultural level first . otherwise your push for change flops . government did n't abolish slavery before there was enough of a cultural push to achieve it . women were n't just willy nilly up and granted the right to vote until culture built up enough steam to support it . you are taking a very shallow look at human action , and then calling it ineffective . you are saying a libertarian society wo n't work because people wo n't do the work . ironically , that is exactly why our state is being used against us by the oligarchy . if what you are saying is true , then the state fails on the same grouds that you claim a libertarian society would fail . not even fucking reddit manages to abstain from companies they hate , such as ea or walmart or exxon or bp or boa . try to convince a guy on a minimum wage job to buy great local products instead of skimming cheapskate supermarket chain special offers , do n't even mind when your ideal system got rid of minimum wage and he works for , literally , nothing but board and lodge . are you forgetting the state has been used by these companies extensively ? are you forgetting that the state is being used to prevent us from having viable options ?	cgtb5my	politics	2,014	i proposed to get money out of politics . you said why bother , let 's go libertarian . now i explained you why getting money out of politics is better than libertarianism . and now you tell me that we have an issue because we have money in politics ? really ? you really did n't . you explained that it can be done . i never really refuted that . i asked why its better to use a state that always reverts back to protecting the oligarchy once you stop looking which people do every time , because they are under the false impression that they can . this entire paragraph is exactly why libertarianism is total bs . it 's the naive idea that collective willpower somehow overcomes the laws of economy that have established over millenia . that somehow , a hivemind will form that will reject morally bad companies even if they make the cheaper offer . you could not say a more ironic thing as someone who supports the use of a compulsory state . any change you want to effect through government happens on a cultural level first . otherwise your push for change flops . government did n't abolish slavery before there was enough of a cultural push to achieve it . @@women## were n't just willy nilly up and granted the right to vote until culture built up enough steam to support it . you are taking a very shallow look at human action , and then calling it ineffective . you are saying a libertarian society wo n't work because people wo n't do the work . ironically , that is exactly why our state is being used against us by the oligarchy . if what you are saying is true , then the state fails on the same grouds that you claim a libertarian society would fail . not even fucking @@reddit## manages to abstain from companies they hate , such as ea or walmart or exxon or bp or boa . try to convince a guy on a minimum wage job to buy great local products instead of skimming cheapskate supermarket chain special offers , do n't even mind when your ideal system got rid of minimum wage and he works for , literally , nothing but board and lodge . are you forgetting the state has been used by these companies extensively ? are you forgetting that the state is being used to prevent us from having viable options ?	i proposed to get money out of politics . you said why bother , let 's go libertarian . now i explained you why getting money out of politics is better than libertarianism . and now you tell me that we have an issue because we have money in politics ? really ? you really did n't . you explained that it can be done . i never really refuted that . i asked why its better to use a state that always reverts back to protecting the oligarchy once you stop looking which people do every time , because they are under the false impression that they can . this entire paragraph is exactly why libertarianism is total bs . it 's the naive idea that collective willpower somehow overcomes the laws of economy that have established over millenia . that somehow , a hivemind will form that will reject morally @@bad companies## even if they make the cheaper offer . you could not say a more ironic thing as someone who supports the use of a compulsory state . any change you want to effect through government happens on a cultural level first . otherwise your push for change flops . government did n't abolish slavery before there was enough of a cultural push to achieve it . @@women## were n't just willy nilly up and granted the right to vote until culture built up enough steam to support it . you are taking a very shallow look at human action , and then calling it ineffective . you are saying a libertarian society wo n't work because people wo n't do the work . ironically , that is exactly why our state is being used against us by the oligarchy . if what you are saying is true , then the state fails on the same grouds that you claim a libertarian society would fail . not even fucking @@reddit## manages to abstain from companies they hate , such as @@ea## or @@walmart## or @@exxon## or @@bp## or @@boa## . try to convince a guy on a minimum wage job to buy great local products instead of skimming cheapskate supermarket chain special offers , do n't even mind when your ideal system got rid of minimum wage and he works for , literally , nothing but board and lodge . are you forgetting the state has been used by these companies extensively ? are you forgetting that the state is being used to prevent us from having viable options ?	i proposed to get money out of politics . you said why bother , let 's go libertarian . now i explained you why getting money out of politics is better than libertarianism . and now you tell me that we have an issue because we have money in politics ? really ? you really did n't . you explained that it can be done . i never really refuted that . i asked why its better to use a state that always reverts back to protecting the oligarchy once you stop looking which people do every time , because they are under the false impression that they can . this entire paragraph is exactly why libertarianism is total bs . it 's the naive idea that collective willpower somehow overcomes the laws of economy that have established over millenia . that somehow , a hivemind will form that will reject morally bad companies even if they make the cheaper offer . you could not say a more ironic thing as someone who supports the use of a compulsory state . any change you want to effect through government happens on a cultural level first . otherwise your push for change flops . government did n't abolish slavery before there was enough of a cultural push to achieve it . @@women## were n't just willy nilly up and granted the right to vote until culture built up enough steam to support it . you are taking a very shallow look at human action , and then calling it ineffective . you are saying a libertarian society wo n't work because people wo n't do the work . ironically , that is exactly why our state is being used against us by the oligarchy . if what you are saying is true , then the state fails on the same grouds that you claim a libertarian society would fail . not even fucking @@reddit## manages to abstain from companies they hate , such as @@ea## or @@walmart## or @@exxon## or @@bp## or @@boa## . try to convince a guy on a minimum wage job to buy great local products instead of skimming cheapskate supermarket chain special offers , do n't even mind when your ideal system got rid of minimum wage and he works for , literally , nothing but board and lodge . are you forgetting the state has been used by these companies extensively ? are you forgetting that the state is being used to prevent us from having viable options ?	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "B", "O", "B", "O", "B", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 2, 0, 2, 0, 2, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "i", "proposed", "to", "get", "money", "out", "of", "politics", ".", "you", "said", "why", "bother", ",", "let", "'s", "go", "libertarian", ".", "now", "i", "explained", "you", "why", "getting", "money", "out", "of", "politics", "is", "better", "than", "libertarianism", ".", "and", "now", "you", "tell", "me", "that", "we", "have", "an", "issue", "because", "we", "have", "money", "in", "politics", "?", "really", "?", "you", "really", "did", "n't", ".", "you", "explained", "that", "it", "can", "be", "done", ".", "i", "never", "really", "refuted", "that", ".", "i", "asked", "why", "its", "better", "to", "use", "a", "state", "that", "always", "reverts", "back", "to", "protecting", "the", "oligarchy", "once", "you", "stop", "looking", "which", "people", "do", "every", "time", ",", "because", "they", "are", "under", "the", "false", "impression", "that", "they", "can", ".", "this", "entire", "paragraph", "is", "exactly", "why", "libertarianism", "is", "total", "bs", ".", "it", "'s", "the", "naive", "idea", "that", "collective", "willpower", "somehow", "overcomes", "the", "laws", "of", "economy", "that", "have", "established", "over", "millenia", ".", "that", "somehow", ",", "a", "hivemind", "will", "form", "that", "will", "reject", "morally", "bad", "companies", "even", "if", "they", "make", "the", "cheaper", "offer", ".", "you", "could", "not", "say", "a", "more", "ironic", "thing", "as", "someone", "who", "supports", "the", "use", "of", "a", "compulsory", "state", ".", "any", "change", "you", "want", "to", "effect", "through", "government", "happens", "on", "a", "cultural", "level", "first", ".", "otherwise", "your", "push", "for", "change", "flops", ".", "government", "did", "n't", "abolish", "slavery", "before", "there", "was", "enough", "of", "a", "cultural", "push", "to", "achieve", "it", ".", "women", "were", "n't", "just", "willy", "nilly", "up", "and", "granted", "the", "right", "to", "vote", "until", "culture", "built", "up", "enough", "steam", "to", "support", "it", ".", "you", "are", "taking", "a", "very", "shallow", "look", "at", "human", "action", ",", "and", "then", "calling", "it", "ineffective", ".", "you", "are", "saying", "a", "libertarian", "society", "wo", "n't", "work", "because", "people", "wo", "n't", "do", "the", "work", ".", "ironically", ",", "that", "is", "exactly", "why", "our", "state", "is", "being", "used", "against", "us", "by", "the", "oligarchy", ".", "if", "what", "you", "are", "saying", "is", "true", ",", "then", "the", "state", "fails", "on", "the", "same", "grouds", "that", "you", "claim", "a", "libertarian", "society", "would", "fail", ".", "not", "even", "fucking", "reddit", "manages", "to", "abstain", "from", "companies", "they", "hate", ",", "such", "as", "ea", "or", "walmart", "or", "exxon", "or", "bp", "or", "boa", ".", "try", "to", "convince", "a", "guy", "on", "a", "minimum", "wage", "job", "to", "buy", "great", "local", "products", "instead", "of", "skimming", "cheapskate", "supermarket", "chain", "special", "offers", ",", "do", "n't", "even", "mind", "when", "your", "ideal", "system", "got", "rid", "of", "minimum", "wage", "and", "he", "works", "for", ",", "literally", ",", "nothing", "but", "board", "and", "lodge", ".", "are", "you", "forgetting", "the", "state", "has", "been", "used", "by", "these", "companies", "extensively", "?", "are", "you", "forgetting", "that", "the", "state", "is", "being", "used", "to", "prevent", "us", "from", "having", "viable", "options", "?" ]
i took it as casting a vote and feeling like you were struggling against the tides of stupidity . i 'm not saying he should n't keep trying , but it seems like inhofe and coburn are locked in there . it sounds like coburn wo n't serve his full term ... but even so , i would n't be surprised if the next ok republican in line was a lock for his seat .	cg7pn2b	politics	2,014	i took it as casting a vote and feeling like you were struggling against the tides of stupidity . i 'm not saying he should n't keep trying , but it seems like inhofe and coburn are locked in there . it sounds like coburn wo n't serve his full term ... but even so , i would n't be surprised if the next ok republican in line was a lock for his seat .	i took it as casting a vote and feeling like you were struggling against the tides of stupidity . i 'm not saying he should n't keep trying , but it seems like inhofe and coburn are locked in there . it sounds like coburn wo n't serve his full term ... but even so , i would n't be surprised if the next ok republican in line was a lock for his seat .	i took it as casting a vote and feeling like you were struggling against the tides of stupidity . i 'm not saying he should n't keep trying , but it seems like inhofe and coburn are locked in there . it sounds like coburn wo n't serve his full term ... but even so , i would n't be surprised if the next ok republican in line was a lock for his seat .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "i", "took", "it", "as", "casting", "a", "vote", "and", "feeling", "like", "you", "were", "struggling", "against", "the", "tides", "of", "stupidity", ".", "i", "'m", "not", "saying", "he", "should", "n't", "keep", "trying", ",", "but", "it", "seems", "like", "inhofe", "and", "coburn", "are", "locked", "in", "there", ".", "it", "sounds", "like", "coburn", "wo", "n't", "serve", "his", "full", "term", "...", "but", "even", "so", ",", "i", "would", "n't", "be", "surprised", "if", "the", "next", "ok", "republican", "in", "line", "was", "a", "lock", "for", "his", "seat", "." ]
yes , the house passed the disclose act , when democrats were in the majority in 2010 217 support vs. 36 against , and even though there was almost unanimous republican opposition 2 support vs. 170 against . and then the republican minority pulled a filibuster URL in the senate and had enough votes to prevent cloture so it never got an up or down vote . if if had not been filibustered by republicans , it had enough support from democrats that it would have easily passed . how 's that for context ?	cljxuwn	politics	2,014	yes , @@the house## passed the disclose act , when @@democrats## were in the majority in 2010 217 support vs. 36 against , and even though there was almost unanimous republican opposition 2 support vs. 170 against . and then the @@republican minority## pulled a filibuster URL in @@the senate## and had enough votes to prevent cloture so it never got an up or down vote . if if had not been filibustered by @@republicans## , it had enough support from @@democrats## that it would have easily passed . how 's that for context ?	yes , the house passed the disclose act , when @@democrats## were in the majority in 2010 217 support vs. 36 against , and even though there was almost @@unanimous republican opposition## 2 support vs. 170 against . and then the @@republican minority## pulled a filibuster URL in @@the senate## and had enough votes to prevent cloture so it never got an up or down vote . if if had not been filibustered by @@republicans## , it had enough support from @@democrats## that it would have easily passed . how 's that for context ?	yes , the house passed the disclose act , when @@democrats## were in the majority in 2010 217 support vs. 36 against , and even though there was almost @@unanimous republican opposition## 2 support vs. 170 against . and then the @@republican minority## pulled a filibuster URL in @@the senate## and had enough votes to prevent cloture so it never got an up or down vote . if if had not been filibustered by @@republicans## , it had enough support from @@democrats## that it would have easily passed . how 's that for context ?	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "yes", ",", "the", "house", "passed", "the", "disclose", "act", ",", "when", "democrats", "were", "in", "the", "majority", "in", "2010", "217", "support", "vs.", "36", "against", ",", "and", "even", "though", "there", "was", "almost", "unanimous", "republican", "opposition", "2", "support", "vs.", "170", "against", ".", "and", "then", "the", "republican", "minority", "pulled", "a", "filibuster", "URL", "in", "the", "senate", "and", "had", "enough", "votes", "to", "prevent", "cloture", "so", "it", "never", "got", "an", "up", "or", "down", "vote", ".", "if", "if", "had", "not", "been", "filibustered", "by", "republicans", ",", "it", "had", "enough", "support", "from", "democrats", "that", "it", "would", "have", "easily", "passed", ".", "how", "'s", "that", "for", "context", "?" ]
you can have a policy of not doing something and still do it on occasion . for instance , every return policy in the world . doing fact checking '' of statements like this just demonstrates that the process is a joke , something this subreddit fully embraced when politifact happened to say something bad about obama last year URL . the fact that administrations have said for decades that we do n't negotiate with terrorists demonstrates that we have a policy of not negotiating with terrorists . examples of such negotiations just show frequent departures from the policy . whether this is another departure or a change in policy is n't something susceptible to neutral fact checking .	chwxmil	politics	2,014	you can have a policy of not doing something and still do it on occasion . for instance , every return policy in the world . doing fact checking '' of statements like this just demonstrates that the process is a joke , something this subreddit fully embraced when politifact happened to say something bad about obama last year URL . the fact that administrations have said for decades that we do n't negotiate with @@terrorists## demonstrates that we have a policy of not negotiating with @@terrorists## . examples of such negotiations just show frequent departures from the policy . whether this is another departure or a change in policy is n't something susceptible to neutral fact checking .	you can have a policy of not doing something and still do it on occasion . for instance , every return policy in the world . doing fact checking '' of statements like this just demonstrates that the process is a joke , something this subreddit fully embraced when politifact happened to say something bad about obama last year URL . the fact that administrations have said for decades that we do n't negotiate with @@terrorists## demonstrates that we have a policy of not negotiating with @@terrorists## . examples of such negotiations just show frequent departures from the policy . whether this is another departure or a change in policy is n't something susceptible to neutral fact checking .	you can have a policy of not doing something and still do it on occasion . for instance , every return policy in the world . doing fact checking '' of statements like this just demonstrates that the process is a joke , something this subreddit fully embraced when politifact happened to say something bad about obama last year URL . the fact that administrations have said for decades that we do n't negotiate with @@terrorists## demonstrates that we have a policy of not negotiating with @@terrorists## . examples of such negotiations just show frequent departures from the policy . whether this is another departure or a change in policy is n't something susceptible to neutral fact checking .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "you", "can", "have", "a", "policy", "of", "not", "doing", "something", "and", "still", "do", "it", "on", "occasion", ".", "for", "instance", ",", "every", "return", "policy", "in", "the", "world", ".", "doing", "fact", "checking", "``", "of", "statements", "like", "this", "just", "demonstrates", "that", "the", "process", "is", "a", "joke", ",", "something", "this", "subreddit", "fully", "embraced", "when", "politifact", "happened", "to", "say", "something", "bad", "about", "obama", "last", "year", "URL", ".", "the", "fact", "that", "administrations", "have", "said", "for", "decades", "that", "we", "do", "n't", "negotiate", "with", "terrorists", "demonstrates", "that", "we", "have", "a", "policy", "of", "not", "negotiating", "with", "terrorists", ".", "examples", "of", "such", "negotiations", "just", "show", "frequent", "departures", "from", "the", "policy", ".", "whether", "this", "is", "another", "departure", "or", "a", "change", "in", "policy", "is", "n't", "something", "susceptible", "to", "neutral", "fact", "checking", "." ]
he should get used to this type of reception .	cf4p05j	politics	2,014	he should get used to this type of reception .	he should get used to this type of reception .	he should get used to this type of reception .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "he", "should", "get", "used", "to", "this", "type", "of", "reception", "." ]
she 's lost her seat . she knows it . she can squeal all she wants . she 's toast	clynqk5	politics	2,014	she 's lost her seat . she knows it . she can squeal all she wants . she 's toast	she 's lost her seat . she knows it . she can squeal all she wants . she 's toast	she 's lost her seat . she knows it . she can squeal all she wants . she 's toast	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "she", "'s", "lost", "her", "seat", ".", "she", "knows", "it", ".", "she", "can", "squeal", "all", "she", "wants", ".", "she", "'s", "toast" ]
now i know why a starbucks on pine st in seattle has just one employee and an automated machine that makes the drinks .	ch7izy9	politics	2,014	now i know why a starbucks on pine st in seattle has just one employee and an automated machine that makes the drinks .	now i know why a starbucks on pine st in seattle has just one employee and an automated machine that makes the drinks .	now i know why a starbucks on pine st in seattle has just one employee and an automated machine that makes the drinks .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "now", "i", "know", "why", "a", "starbucks", "on", "pine", "st", "in", "seattle", "has", "just", "one", "employee", "and", "an", "automated", "machine", "that", "makes", "the", "drinks", "." ]
fair enough , but what was mexico 's response to the sandy hook shootings ?	cm3qs3j	politics	2,014	fair enough , but what was @@mexico## 's response to the sandy hook shootings ?	fair enough , but what was @@mexico 's## response to the sandy hook shootings ?	fair enough , but what was @@mexico 's## response to the sandy hook shootings ?	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "fair", "enough", ",", "but", "what", "was", "mexico", "'s", "response", "to", "the", "sandy", "hook", "shootings", "?" ]
all the deficits are much bigger than when he took office . nearly doubling the deficit each year for the first three years and then lowering it from the high , only in government land is considering shrinking the deficit .	cgu1okr	politics	2,014	all the deficits are much bigger than when he took office . nearly doubling the deficit each year for the first three years and then lowering it from the high , only in government land is considering shrinking the deficit .	all the deficits are much bigger than when he took office . nearly doubling the deficit each year for the first three years and then lowering it from the high , only in government land is considering shrinking the deficit .	all the deficits are much bigger than when he took office . nearly doubling the deficit each year for the first three years and then lowering it from the high , only in government land is considering shrinking the deficit .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "all", "the", "deficits", "are", "much", "bigger", "than", "when", "he", "took", "office", ".", "nearly", "doubling", "the", "deficit", "each", "year", "for", "the", "first", "three", "years", "and", "then", "lowering", "it", "from", "the", "high", ",", "only", "in", "government", "land", "is", "considering", "shrinking", "the", "deficit", "." ]
fringe candidate ? that 's your opinion . he 's taking up a majority of posts because his message actually resonates with people unlike the same old hoopla u.s. voters are sick and tired of hearing .	csqkjpb	politics	2,015	fringe candidate ? that 's your opinion . he 's taking up a majority of posts because his message actually resonates with people unlike the same old hoopla @@u.s. voters## are sick and tired of hearing .	fringe candidate ? that 's your opinion . he 's taking up a majority of posts because his message actually resonates with people unlike the same @@old hoopla u.s. voters## are sick and tired of hearing .	fringe candidate ? that 's your opinion . he 's taking up a majority of posts because his message actually resonates with people unlike the same @@old hoopla u.s. voters## are sick and tired of hearing .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "fringe", "candidate", "?", "that", "'s", "your", "opinion", ".", "he", "'s", "taking", "up", "a", "majority", "of", "posts", "because", "his", "message", "actually", "resonates", "with", "people", "unlike", "the", "same", "old", "hoopla", "u.s.", "voters", "are", "sick", "and", "tired", "of", "hearing", "." ]
because that 's based on disproved pseudoscientific bullshit made up specifically to limit abortion access and pander to prolife voters . URL	cy07n1x	politics	2,015	because that 's based on disproved pseudoscientific bullshit made up specifically to limit abortion access and pander to prolife voters . URL	because that 's based on disproved pseudoscientific bullshit made up specifically to limit abortion access and pander to @@prolife voters## . URL	because that 's based on disproved pseudoscientific bullshit made up specifically to limit abortion access and pander to @@prolife voters## . URL	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0 ]	[ "because", "that", "'s", "based", "on", "disproved", "pseudoscientific", "bullshit", "made", "up", "specifically", "to", "limit", "abortion", "access", "and", "pander", "to", "prolife", "voters", ".", "URL" ]
i did n't read to far but campaigning to drop state education bureaucracy and allowing federal to do the job does n't seem very conservative .	cnkdnwu	politics	2,015	i did n't read to far but campaigning to drop state education bureaucracy and allowing federal to do the job does n't seem very conservative .	i did n't read to far but campaigning to drop state education bureaucracy and allowing federal to do the job does n't seem very conservative .	i did n't read to far but campaigning to drop state education bureaucracy and allowing federal to do the job does n't seem very conservative .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "i", "did", "n't", "read", "to", "far", "but", "campaigning", "to", "drop", "state", "education", "bureaucracy", "and", "allowing", "federal", "to", "do", "the", "job", "does", "n't", "seem", "very", "conservative", "." ]
i can agree with this . this is why i support a voucher system as opposed to public schooling and why i support nit instead of minimum wage .	crsdx71	politics	2,015	i can agree with this . this is why i support a voucher system as opposed to public schooling and why i support nit instead of minimum wage .	i can agree with this . this is why i support a voucher system as opposed to public schooling and why i support nit instead of minimum wage .	i can agree with this . this is why i support a voucher system as opposed to public schooling and why i support nit instead of minimum wage .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "i", "can", "agree", "with", "this", ".", "this", "is", "why", "i", "support", "a", "voucher", "system", "as", "opposed", "to", "public", "schooling", "and", "why", "i", "support", "nit", "instead", "of", "minimum", "wage", "." ]
if you think the modern right will ever look at any plan proposed by a democratic president and say , you 've got a point , '' you 're living in a dream world .	ct1w8za	politics	2,015	if you think the modern right will ever look at any plan proposed by a democratic president and say , you 've got a point , '' you 're living in a dream world .	if you think the modern right will ever look at any plan proposed by a democratic president and say , you 've got a point , '' you 're living in a dream world .	if you think @@the modern right## will ever look at any plan proposed by a democratic president and say , you 've got a point , '' you 're living in a dream world .	[ "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "if", "you", "think", "the", "modern", "right", "will", "ever", "look", "at", "any", "plan", "proposed", "by", "a", "democratic", "president", "and", "say", ",", "you", "'ve", "got", "a", "point", ",", "``", "you", "'re", "living", "in", "a", "dream", "world", "." ]
what is even the point of campaign spending limits if you can just void them by spending a ridiculous amount ? that seems like the exact thing they 're supposed to prevent .	cxgruft	politics	2,015	what is even the point of campaign spending limits if you can just void them by spending a ridiculous amount ? that seems like the exact thing they 're supposed to prevent .	what is even the point of campaign spending limits if you can just void them by spending a ridiculous amount ? that seems like the exact thing they 're supposed to prevent .	what is even the point of campaign spending limits if you can just void them by spending a ridiculous amount ? that seems like the exact thing they 're supposed to prevent .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "what", "is", "even", "the", "point", "of", "campaign", "spending", "limits", "if", "you", "can", "just", "void", "them", "by", "spending", "a", "ridiculous", "amount", "?", "that", "seems", "like", "the", "exact", "thing", "they", "'re", "supposed", "to", "prevent", "." ]
knife owners too . baseball bat owners also tire irons . all hand tools . arms , legs , the head head butt liability . most any and everything out there needs liability insurance . edit come to think of it , liability insurance is a right . everyone should have government paid for liability insurance . even the illegal aliens living here need liability insurance .	crp7bmj	politics	2,015	knife owners too . baseball bat owners also tire irons . all hand tools . arms , legs , the head head butt liability . most any and everything out there needs liability insurance . edit come to think of it , liability insurance is a right . everyone should have government paid for liability insurance . even the @@illegal aliens## living here need liability insurance .	@@knife owners## too . @@baseball bat owners## also tire irons . all hand tools . arms , legs , the head head butt liability . most any and everything out there needs liability insurance . edit come to think of it , liability insurance is a right . everyone should have government paid for liability insurance . even the @@illegal aliens## living here need liability insurance .	@@knife owners## too . @@baseball bat owners## also tire irons . all hand tools . arms , legs , the head head butt liability . most any and everything out there needs liability insurance . edit come to think of it , liability insurance is a right . everyone should have government paid for liability insurance . even the @@illegal aliens## living here need liability insurance .	[ "B", "I", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 2, 1, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "knife", "owners", "too", ".", "baseball", "bat", "owners", "also", "tire", "irons", ".", "all", "hand", "tools", ".", "arms", ",", "legs", ",", "the", "head", "head", "butt", "liability", ".", "most", "any", "and", "everything", "out", "there", "needs", "liability", "insurance", ".", "edit", "come", "to", "think", "of", "it", ",", "liability", "insurance", "is", "a", "right", ".", "everyone", "should", "have", "government", "paid", "for", "liability", "insurance", ".", "even", "the", "illegal", "aliens", "living", "here", "need", "liability", "insurance", "." ]
there you go ignoring everything i say and just repeating again . look , that is not how pro life people see the argument . for them , the choice is not important , it the right to life that the fetus has . that 's well and good , but that 's their rationale , not their position . like it or not , their position on the question should one have the choice to legally abort a pregnancy , '' which is the point of disagreement , is no . '' it does n't matter why they feel that way . as i 've said before , rationale and feelings do n't enter into the equation . this is not about why they hold a position . this is about the fact that they hold a position . this it not about feelings . unless you disagree that their answer is no '' to the question do you think one should have the choice to legally abort a pregnancy '' then you agree with me here . because that is my argument . that they would answer no '' to that question . i do n't care about why they answer no , '' just like i do n't care why a prochoicer would answer yes . '' because it 's irrelevant to this discussion . which makes it astounding to me that you somehow think i 'm treating antichoicers unfairly because i 'm holding their position to the same exact standards to which i 'm holding the other side . the only way you can possibly disprove my argument is to argue that they prolifers would answer yes . '' calling them anti choice is framing their argument in a negative light . again , political framing is incompatible with objectivity , so unless you think that they would answer yes '' to that question , again , it is not politically framing their argument . it is an objective representation of their position , which as i 've said about 50 million times , is what i 'm talking about . not their fucking argument . note how many times i 've clarified this . it 's probably upwards of 20 or 30 by now . i 'm not talking about their argument , reason , rationale , or pointofview , because that is not relevant to the question of what their position is , and this entire thing , from the very beginning when i first responded was about position , and only position .	cvazkjf	politics	2,015	there you go ignoring everything i say and just repeating again . look , that is not how @@pro life people## see the argument . for them , the choice is not important , it the right to life that the fetus has . that 's well and good , but that 's their rationale , not their position . like it or not , their position on the question should one have the choice to legally abort a pregnancy , '' which is the point of disagreement , is no . '' it does n't matter why they feel that way . as i 've said before , rationale and feelings do n't enter into the equation . this is not about why they hold a position . this is about the fact that they hold a position . this it not about feelings . unless you disagree that their answer is no '' to the question do you think one should have the choice to legally abort a pregnancy '' then you agree with me here . because that is my argument . that they would answer no '' to that question . i do n't care about why they answer no , '' just like i do n't care why a prochoicer would answer yes . '' because it 's irrelevant to this discussion . which makes it astounding to me that you somehow think i 'm treating @@antichoicers## unfairly because i 'm holding their position to the same exact standards to which i 'm holding the other side . the only way you can possibly disprove my argument is to argue that they @@prolifers## would answer yes . '' calling them anti choice is framing their argument in a negative light . again , political framing is incompatible with objectivity , so unless you think that they would answer yes '' to that question , again , it is not politically framing their argument . it is an objective representation of their position , which as i 've said about 50 million times , is what i 'm talking about . not their fucking argument . note how many times i 've clarified this . it 's probably upwards of 20 or 30 by now . i 'm not talking about their argument , reason , rationale , or pointofview , because that is not relevant to the question of what their position is , and this entire thing , from the very beginning when i first responded was about position , and only position .	there you go ignoring everything i say and just repeating again . look , that is not how @@pro life people## see the argument . for them , the choice is not important , it the right to life that the fetus has . that 's well and good , but that 's their rationale , not their position . like it or not , their position on the question should one have the choice to legally abort a pregnancy , '' which is the point of disagreement , is no . '' it does n't matter why they feel that way . as i 've said before , rationale and feelings do n't enter into the equation . this is not about why they hold a position . this is about the fact that they hold a position . this it not about feelings . unless you disagree that their answer is no '' to the question do you think one should have the choice to legally abort a pregnancy '' then you agree with me here . because that is my argument . that they would answer no '' to that question . i do n't care about why they answer no , '' just like i do n't care why a prochoicer would answer yes . '' because it 's irrelevant to this discussion . which makes it astounding to me that you somehow think i 'm treating @@antichoicers## unfairly because i 'm holding their position to the same exact standards to which i 'm holding the other side . the only way you can possibly disprove my argument is to argue that they prolifers would answer yes . '' calling them anti choice is framing their argument in a negative light . again , political framing is incompatible with objectivity , so unless you think that they would answer yes '' to that question , again , it is not politically framing their argument . it is an objective representation of their position , which as i 've said about 50 million times , is what i 'm talking about . not their fucking argument . note how many times i 've clarified this . it 's probably upwards of 20 or 30 by now . i 'm not talking about their argument , reason , rationale , or pointofview , because that is not relevant to the question of what their position is , and this entire thing , from the very beginning when i first responded was about position , and only position .	there you go ignoring everything i say and just repeating again . look , that is not how @@pro life people## see the argument . for them , the choice is not important , it the right to life that the fetus has . that 's well and good , but that 's their rationale , not their position . like it or not , their position on the question should one have the choice to legally abort a pregnancy , '' which is the point of disagreement , is no . '' it does n't matter why they feel that way . as i 've said before , rationale and feelings do n't enter into the equation . this is not about why they hold a position . this is about the fact that they hold a position . this it not about feelings . unless you disagree that their answer is no '' to the question do you think one should have the choice to legally abort a pregnancy '' then you agree with me here . because that is my argument . that they would answer no '' to that question . i do n't care about why they answer no , '' just like i do n't care why a prochoicer would answer yes . '' because it 's irrelevant to this discussion . which makes it astounding to me that you somehow think i 'm treating @@antichoicers## unfairly because i 'm holding their position to the same exact standards to which i 'm holding the other side . the only way you can possibly disprove my argument is to argue that they prolifers would answer yes . '' calling them anti choice is framing their argument in a negative light . again , political framing is incompatible with objectivity , so unless you think that they would answer yes '' to that question , again , it is not politically framing their argument . it is an objective representation of their position , which as i 've said about 50 million times , is what i 'm talking about . not their fucking argument . note how many times i 've clarified this . it 's probably upwards of 20 or 30 by now . i 'm not talking about their argument , reason , rationale , or pointofview , because that is not relevant to the question of what their position is , and this entire thing , from the very beginning when i first responded was about position , and only position .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "there", "you", "go", "ignoring", "everything", "i", "say", "and", "just", "repeating", "again", ".", "look", ",", "that", "is", "not", "how", "pro", "life", "people", "see", "the", "argument", ".", "for", "them", ",", "the", "choice", "is", "not", "important", ",", "it", "the", "right", "to", "life", "that", "the", "fetus", "has", ".", "that", "'s", "well", "and", "good", ",", "but", "that", "'s", "their", "rationale", ",", "not", "their", "position", ".", "like", "it", "or", "not", ",", "their", "position", "on", "the", "question", "should", "one", "have", "the", "choice", "to", "legally", "abort", "a", "pregnancy", ",", "``", "which", "is", "the", "point", "of", "disagreement", ",", "is", "no", ".", "``", "it", "does", "n't", "matter", "why", "they", "feel", "that", "way", ".", "as", "i", "'ve", "said", "before", ",", "rationale", "and", "feelings", "do", "n't", "enter", "into", "the", "equation", ".", "this", "is", "not", "about", "why", "they", "hold", "a", "position", ".", "this", "is", "about", "the", "fact", "that", "they", "hold", "a", "position", ".", "this", "it", "not", "about", "feelings", ".", "unless", "you", "disagree", "that", "their", "answer", "is", "no", "``", "to", "the", "question", "do", "you", "think", "one", "should", "have", "the", "choice", "to", "legally", "abort", "a", "pregnancy", "``", "then", "you", "agree", "with", "me", "here", ".", "because", "that", "is", "my", "argument", ".", "that", "they", "would", "answer", "no", "``", "to", "that", "question", ".", "i", "do", "n't", "care", "about", "why", "they", "answer", "no", ",", "``", "just", "like", "i", "do", "n't", "care", "why", "a", "prochoicer", "would", "answer", "yes", ".", "``", "because", "it", "'s", "irrelevant", "to", "this", "discussion", ".", "which", "makes", "it", "astounding", "to", "me", "that", "you", "somehow", "think", "i", "'m", "treating", "antichoicers", "unfairly", "because", "i", "'m", "holding", "their", "position", "to", "the", "same", "exact", "standards", "to", "which", "i", "'m", "holding", "the", "other", "side", ".", "the", "only", "way", "you", "can", "possibly", "disprove", "my", "argument", "is", "to", "argue", "that", "they", "prolifers", "would", "answer", "yes", ".", "``", "calling", "them", "anti", "choice", "is", "framing", "their", "argument", "in", "a", "negative", "light", ".", "again", ",", "political", "framing", "is", "incompatible", "with", "objectivity", ",", "so", "unless", "you", "think", "that", "they", "would", "answer", "yes", "``", "to", "that", "question", ",", "again", ",", "it", "is", "not", "politically", "framing", "their", "argument", ".", "it", "is", "an", "objective", "representation", "of", "their", "position", ",", "which", "as", "i", "'ve", "said", "about", "50", "million", "times", ",", "is", "what", "i", "'m", "talking", "about", ".", "not", "their", "fucking", "argument", ".", "note", "how", "many", "times", "i", "'ve", "clarified", "this", ".", "it", "'s", "probably", "upwards", "of", "20", "or", "30", "by", "now", ".", "i", "'m", "not", "talking", "about", "their", "argument", ",", "reason", ",", "rationale", ",", "or", "pointofview", ",", "because", "that", "is", "not", "relevant", "to", "the", "question", "of", "what", "their", "position", "is", ",", "and", "this", "entire", "thing", ",", "from", "the", "very", "beginning", "when", "i", "first", "responded", "was", "about", "position", ",", "and", "only", "position", "." ]
of course that only leaves the duds ...	cpiiio2	politics	2,015	of course that only leaves the duds ...	of course that only leaves @@the duds## ...	of course that only leaves @@the duds## ...	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0 ]	[ "of", "course", "that", "only", "leaves", "the", "duds", "..." ]
i called bush out on it but i 'm fine with obama doing it because obama is my guy . so proud to have voted for him , and so proud he is my president ! herobama firstevar	cxoncil	politics	2,015	i called bush out on it but i 'm fine with obama doing it because obama is my guy . so proud to have voted for him , and so proud he is my president ! herobama firstevar	i called bush out on it but i 'm fine with obama doing it because obama is my guy . so proud to have voted for him , and so proud he is my president ! herobama firstevar	i called bush out on it but i 'm fine with obama doing it because obama is my guy . so proud to have voted for him , and so proud he is my president ! herobama firstevar	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "i", "called", "bush", "out", "on", "it", "but", "i", "'m", "fine", "with", "obama", "doing", "it", "because", "obama", "is", "my", "guy", ".", "so", "proud", "to", "have", "voted", "for", "him", ",", "and", "so", "proud", "he", "is", "my", "president", "!", "herobama", "firstevar" ]
i 'm honestly confused . where did the 5,475,000 come from ? would n't the sum of daily loans add up to 365,000 ?	ctvxn4m	politics	2,015	i 'm honestly confused . where did the 5,475,000 come from ? would n't the sum of daily loans add up to 365,000 ?	i 'm honestly confused . where did the 5,475,000 come from ? would n't the sum of daily loans add up to 365,000 ?	i 'm honestly confused . where did the 5,475,000 come from ? would n't the sum of daily loans add up to 365,000 ?	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "i", "'m", "honestly", "confused", ".", "where", "did", "the", "5,475,000", "come", "from", "?", "would", "n't", "the", "sum", "of", "daily", "loans", "add", "up", "to", "365,000", "?" ]
the topic her is the article which claims they are planning on spending nearly a billion in the next cycle alone . yeah maybe you did n't realize when commenting that my response was to someone who said or asked if the koch brothers are donating a billion dollars . can we agree that they are n't ? this is what the article has to say the kochs ' plan to spend 889 million through their network of 17 allied groups in the 2016 cycle so they are raising a projected 899 million through their network of 17 groups . if we can agree that they are n't indeed donating the money themselves then there really is nothing else to talk about .	co3xy6t	politics	2,015	the topic her is the article which claims they are planning on spending nearly a billion in the next cycle alone . yeah maybe you did n't realize when commenting that my response was to someone who said or asked if the koch brothers are donating a billion dollars . can we agree that they are n't ? this is what the article has to say the kochs ' plan to spend 889 million through their network of 17 allied groups in the 2016 cycle so they are raising a projected 899 million through their network of 17 groups . if we can agree that they are n't indeed donating the money themselves then there really is nothing else to talk about .	the topic her is the article which claims they are planning on spending nearly a billion in the next cycle alone . yeah maybe you did n't realize when commenting that my response was to someone who said or asked if the @@koch brothers## are donating a billion dollars . can we agree that they are n't ? this is what the article has to say @@the kochs## ' plan to spend 889 million through their @@network of 17 allied groups## in the 2016 cycle so they are raising a projected 899 million through their network of 17 groups . if we can agree that they are n't indeed donating the money themselves then there really is nothing else to talk about .	the topic her is the article which claims they are planning on spending nearly a billion in the next cycle alone . yeah maybe you did n't realize when commenting that my response was to someone who said or asked if the @@koch brothers## are donating a billion dollars . can we agree that they are n't ? this is what the article has to say @@the kochs## ' plan to spend 889 million through their @@network of 17 allied groups## in the 2016 cycle so they are raising a projected 899 million through their network of 17 groups . if we can agree that they are n't indeed donating the money themselves then there really is nothing else to talk about .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "the", "topic", "her", "is", "the", "article", "which", "claims", "they", "are", "planning", "on", "spending", "nearly", "a", "billion", "in", "the", "next", "cycle", "alone", ".", "yeah", "maybe", "you", "did", "n't", "realize", "when", "commenting", "that", "my", "response", "was", "to", "someone", "who", "said", "or", "asked", "if", "the", "koch", "brothers", "are", "donating", "a", "billion", "dollars", ".", "can", "we", "agree", "that", "they", "are", "n't", "?", "this", "is", "what", "the", "article", "has", "to", "say", "the", "kochs", "'", "plan", "to", "spend", "889", "million", "through", "their", "network", "of", "17", "allied", "groups", "in", "the", "2016", "cycle", "so", "they", "are", "raising", "a", "projected", "899", "million", "through", "their", "network", "of", "17", "groups", ".", "if", "we", "can", "agree", "that", "they", "are", "n't", "indeed", "donating", "the", "money", "themselves", "then", "there", "really", "is", "nothing", "else", "to", "talk", "about", "." ]
why are foreign policy discussions always about war ? why ca n't we talk about all the money we 're giving to the pakistanis ?	cvywpey	politics	2,015	why are foreign policy discussions always about war ? why ca n't we talk about all the money we 're giving to the @@pakistanis## ?	why are foreign policy discussions always about war ? why ca n't we talk about all the money we 're giving to the pakistanis ?	why are foreign policy discussions always about war ? why ca n't we talk about all the money we 're giving to the @@pakistanis## ?	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0 ]	[ "why", "are", "foreign", "policy", "discussions", "always", "about", "war", "?", "why", "ca", "n't", "we", "talk", "about", "all", "the", "money", "we", "'re", "giving", "to", "the", "pakistanis", "?" ]
you 're supposed to go along with the edginess in the thread , bernie fucked up ... better blame hillary somehow .	cy4mo9o	politics	2,015	you 're supposed to go along with the edginess in the thread , bernie fucked up ... better blame hillary somehow .	you 're supposed to go along with the edginess in the thread , bernie fucked up ... better blame hillary somehow .	you 're supposed to go along with the edginess in the thread , bernie fucked up ... better blame hillary somehow .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "you", "'re", "supposed", "to", "go", "along", "with", "the", "edginess", "in", "the", "thread", ",", "bernie", "fucked", "up", "...", "better", "blame", "hillary", "somehow", "." ]
it takes true words from the newspaper and turns them around backwards and stretches and distorts them till they 're crazy ... omg , silly putty is ben carson !	cw8u3fl	politics	2,015	it takes true words from the newspaper and turns them around backwards and stretches and distorts them till they 're crazy ... omg , silly putty is ben carson !	it takes true words from the newspaper and turns them around backwards and stretches and distorts them till they 're crazy ... omg , silly putty is ben carson !	it takes true words from the newspaper and turns them around backwards and stretches and distorts them till they 're crazy ... omg , silly putty is ben carson !	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "it", "takes", "true", "words", "from", "the", "newspaper", "and", "turns", "them", "around", "backwards", "and", "stretches", "and", "distorts", "them", "till", "they", "'re", "crazy", "...", "omg", ",", "silly", "putty", "is", "ben", "carson", "!" ]
that 's not relevant my focus was on the second sentence of the quote the first was only there to help contextualize it . my point was about how the taxes and fees are only possible , not certain . in fact , it 'd be a ridiculous presumption to assume that all or even most of them would be implemented , as it makes a lot of weird assumptions , such as internet service getting state and local 911 fees added onto it . it 's entirely plausible that the net cost increase will be 0 . senator lee 's statement is one that promises that a there will be increase , and b they will be massive . the first is , at best , a bold prediction . the second just has no grounding in a logical assessment of the situation .	couvcsw	politics	2,015	that 's not relevant my focus was on the second sentence of the quote the first was only there to help contextualize it . my point was about how the taxes and fees are only possible , not certain . in fact , it 'd be a ridiculous presumption to assume that all or even most of them would be implemented , as it makes a lot of weird assumptions , such as internet service getting state and local 911 fees added onto it . it 's entirely plausible that the net cost increase will be 0 . senator lee 's statement is one that promises that a there will be increase , and b they will be massive . the first is , at best , a bold prediction . the second just has no grounding in a logical assessment of the situation .	that 's not relevant my focus was on the second sentence of the quote the first was only there to help contextualize it . my point was about how the taxes and fees are only possible , not certain . in fact , it 'd be a ridiculous presumption to assume that all or even most of them would be implemented , as it makes a lot of weird assumptions , such as internet service getting state and local 911 fees added onto it . it 's entirely plausible that the net cost increase will be 0 . senator lee 's statement is one that promises that a there will be increase , and b they will be massive . the first is , at best , a bold prediction . the second just has no grounding in a logical assessment of the situation .	that 's not relevant my focus was on the second sentence of the quote the first was only there to help contextualize it . my point was about how the taxes and fees are only possible , not certain . in fact , it 'd be a ridiculous presumption to assume that all or even most of them would be implemented , as it makes a lot of weird assumptions , such as internet service getting state and local 911 fees added onto it . it 's entirely plausible that the net cost increase will be 0 . senator lee 's statement is one that promises that a there will be increase , and b they will be massive . the first is , at best , a bold prediction . the second just has no grounding in a logical assessment of the situation .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "that", "'s", "not", "relevant", "my", "focus", "was", "on", "the", "second", "sentence", "of", "the", "quote", "the", "first", "was", "only", "there", "to", "help", "contextualize", "it", ".", "my", "point", "was", "about", "how", "the", "taxes", "and", "fees", "are", "only", "possible", ",", "not", "certain", ".", "in", "fact", ",", "it", "'d", "be", "a", "ridiculous", "presumption", "to", "assume", "that", "all", "or", "even", "most", "of", "them", "would", "be", "implemented", ",", "as", "it", "makes", "a", "lot", "of", "weird", "assumptions", ",", "such", "as", "internet", "service", "getting", "state", "and", "local", "911", "fees", "added", "onto", "it", ".", "it", "'s", "entirely", "plausible", "that", "the", "net", "cost", "increase", "will", "be", "0", ".", "senator", "lee", "'s", "statement", "is", "one", "that", "promises", "that", "a", "there", "will", "be", "increase", ",", "and", "b", "they", "will", "be", "massive", ".", "the", "first", "is", ",", "at", "best", ",", "a", "bold", "prediction", ".", "the", "second", "just", "has", "no", "grounding", "in", "a", "logical", "assessment", "of", "the", "situation", "." ]
so therefore a lame article about kids takes its place ? this is a step backwards	cnvayzq	politics	2,015	so therefore a lame article about @@kids## takes its place ? this is a step backwards	so therefore a lame article about @@kids## takes its place ? this is a step backwards	so therefore a lame article about @@kids## takes its place ? this is a step backwards	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "so", "therefore", "a", "lame", "article", "about", "kids", "takes", "its", "place", "?", "this", "is", "a", "step", "backwards" ]
hi piede . thank you for participating in SUBREDDIT . however , your submission has been removed for the following reason already submitted this article has been submitted to SUBREDDIT within the last three days URL i 'm a bot and sometimes i make mistakes . if you have any questions about this removal , please feel free to message the moderators . URL regarding the removal of this submission by USER messagei have a question regarding the removal of this submission . URL	cxxb29s	politics	2,015	hi piede . thank you for participating in SUBREDDIT . however , your submission has been removed for the following reason already submitted this article has been submitted to SUBREDDIT within the last three days URL i 'm a bot and sometimes i make mistakes . if you have any questions about this removal , please feel free to message the moderators . URL regarding the removal of this submission by USER messagei have a question regarding the removal of this submission . URL	hi piede . thank you for participating in SUBREDDIT . however , your submission has been removed for the following reason already submitted this article has been submitted to SUBREDDIT within the last three days URL i 'm a bot and sometimes i make mistakes . if you have any questions about this removal , please feel free to message the moderators . URL regarding the removal of this submission by USER messagei have a question regarding the removal of this submission . URL	hi piede . thank you for participating in SUBREDDIT . however , your submission has been removed for the following reason already submitted this article has been submitted to SUBREDDIT within the last three days URL i 'm a bot and sometimes i make mistakes . if you have any questions about this removal , please feel free to message the moderators . URL regarding the removal of this submission by USER messagei have a question regarding the removal of this submission . URL	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "hi", "piede", ".", "thank", "you", "for", "participating", "in", "SUBREDDIT", ".", "however", ",", "your", "submission", "has", "been", "removed", "for", "the", "following", "reason", "already", "submitted", "this", "article", "has", "been", "submitted", "to", "SUBREDDIT", "within", "the", "last", "three", "days", "URL", "i", "'m", "a", "bot", "and", "sometimes", "i", "make", "mistakes", ".", "if", "you", "have", "any", "questions", "about", "this", "removal", ",", "please", "feel", "free", "to", "message", "the", "moderators", ".", "URL", "regarding", "the", "removal", "of", "this", "submission", "by", "USER", "messagei", "have", "a", "question", "regarding", "the", "removal", "of", "this", "submission", ".", "URL" ]
sure , everywhere in the world is the same as denmark .	cqw33a4	politics	2,015	sure , everywhere in the world is the same as denmark .	sure , everywhere in the world is the same as denmark .	sure , everywhere in the world is the same as denmark .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "sure", ",", "everywhere", "in", "the", "world", "is", "the", "same", "as", "denmark", "." ]
i 'm so sick of these polls trying to obviously influence people 's vote , will to vote , or create more apathy . ffs , just give the candidates their air time and let the people vote uninhibited .	cy0c3fy	politics	2,015	i 'm so sick of these polls trying to obviously influence people 's vote , will to vote , or create more apathy . ffs , just give the candidates their air time and let the people vote uninhibited .	i 'm so sick of these polls trying to obviously influence people 's vote , will to vote , or create more apathy . ffs , just give the @@candidates## their air time and let the people vote uninhibited .	i 'm so sick of these polls trying to obviously influence people 's vote , will to vote , or create more apathy . ffs , just give the @@candidates## their air time and let the people vote uninhibited .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "i", "'m", "so", "sick", "of", "these", "polls", "trying", "to", "obviously", "influence", "people", "'s", "vote", ",", "will", "to", "vote", ",", "or", "create", "more", "apathy", ".", "ffs", ",", "just", "give", "the", "candidates", "their", "air", "time", "and", "let", "the", "people", "vote", "uninhibited", "." ]
it makes me sick that she would take money from people like that .	cte52al	politics	2,015	it makes me sick that she would take money from people like that .	it makes me sick that she would take money from people like that .	it makes me sick that she would take money from people like that .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "it", "makes", "me", "sick", "that", "she", "would", "take", "money", "from", "people", "like", "that", "." ]
still , brandishing guns towards any federal agents , regardless of their position , is grounds for a long time in prison .	cuykhm1	politics	2,015	still , brandishing guns towards any @@federal agents## , regardless of their position , is grounds for a long time in prison .	still , brandishing guns towards any @@federal agents## , regardless of their position , is grounds for a long time in prison .	still , brandishing guns towards any @@federal agents## , regardless of their position , is grounds for a long time in prison .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "still", ",", "brandishing", "guns", "towards", "any", "federal", "agents", ",", "regardless", "of", "their", "position", ",", "is", "grounds", "for", "a", "long", "time", "in", "prison", "." ]
you can find a historian that will say anything for attention of money . just watch all the ivy phds on the history channel talking about proof for aliens	cxvfwvn	politics	2,015	you can find a historian that will say anything for attention of money . just watch all the ivy phds on the history channel talking about proof for aliens	you can find a historian that will say anything for attention of money . just watch all the ivy phds on the history channel talking about proof for @@aliens##	you can find a historian that will say anything for attention of money . just watch all the ivy phds on the history channel talking about proof for @@aliens##	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2 ]	[ "you", "can", "find", "a", "historian", "that", "will", "say", "anything", "for", "attention", "of", "money", ".", "just", "watch", "all", "the", "ivy", "phds", "on", "the", "history", "channel", "talking", "about", "proof", "for", "aliens" ]
woo ! the he has no chance is turning into a winning campaign	cuwp5yk	politics	2,015	woo ! the he has no chance is turning into a winning campaign	woo ! the he has no chance is turning into a winning campaign	woo ! the he has no chance is turning into a winning campaign	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "woo", "!", "the", "he", "has", "no", "chance", "is", "turning", "into", "a", "winning", "campaign" ]
he is the ron paul of ron paul of 2016. sorta crazy but has some solid idea that both sides agree on .	cr57xqf	politics	2,015	he is the ron paul of ron paul of 2016. sorta crazy but has some solid idea that @@both sides## agree on .	he is the ron paul of ron paul of 2016. sorta crazy but has some solid idea that both sides agree on .	he is the ron paul of ron paul of 2016. sorta crazy but has some solid idea that both sides agree on .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "he", "is", "the", "ron", "paul", "of", "ron", "paul", "of", "2016.", "sorta", "crazy", "but", "has", "some", "solid", "idea", "that", "both", "sides", "agree", "on", "." ]
so you guys arent doing anything illegal then . i just wonder if i get pulled over , have a gun in the car but i happen to have a felony in my past , will the cops be able to know that i should have a gun ?	cwtd0ok	politics	2,015	so you guys arent doing anything illegal then . i just wonder if i get pulled over , have a gun in the car but i happen to have a felony in my past , will the @@cops## be able to know that i should have a gun ?	so you guys arent doing anything illegal then . i just wonder if i get pulled over , have a gun in the car but i happen to have a felony in my past , will the @@cops## be able to know that i should have a gun ?	so you guys arent doing anything illegal then . i just wonder if i get pulled over , have a gun in the car but i happen to have a felony in my past , will the @@cops## be able to know that i should have a gun ?	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "so", "you", "guys", "arent", "doing", "anything", "illegal", "then", ".", "i", "just", "wonder", "if", "i", "get", "pulled", "over", ",", "have", "a", "gun", "in", "the", "car", "but", "i", "happen", "to", "have", "a", "felony", "in", "my", "past", ",", "will", "the", "cops", "be", "able", "to", "know", "that", "i", "should", "have", "a", "gun", "?" ]
becoming reluctant to being exposed contributing to the wacko global warming deniers , meaning the religious right allies of polluters who do n't want to spend the money necessary to clean up emissions . that was the beauty of alec and other 501 c entities , many set up by the koch brothers and friends , they hid the donors . hence the uproar over irs scrutiny , and republicans cutting irs funding .	cq4heey	politics	2,015	becoming reluctant to being exposed contributing to the wacko @@global warming deniers## , meaning the @@religious right allies## of @@polluters who do n't want to spend the money necessary to clean up emissions## . that was the beauty of alec and other 501 c entities , many set up by the koch brothers and friends , they hid the donors . hence the uproar over irs scrutiny , and @@republicans## cutting irs funding .	becoming reluctant to being exposed contributing to the @@wacko global warming deniers## , meaning the @@religious right allies of polluters## who do n't want to spend the money necessary to clean up emissions . that was the beauty of alec and other @@501 c entities## , many set up by the @@koch brothers## and @@friends## , they hid the @@donors## . hence the uproar over irs scrutiny , and @@republicans## cutting irs funding .	becoming reluctant to being exposed contributing to the @@wacko global warming deniers## , meaning the @@religious right allies of polluters who do n't want to spend the money necessary to clean up emissions## . that was the beauty of alec and other @@501 c entities## , many set up by the @@koch brothers## and @@friends## , they hid the @@donors## . hence the uproar over irs scrutiny , and @@republicans## cutting irs funding .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "becoming", "reluctant", "to", "being", "exposed", "contributing", "to", "the", "wacko", "global", "warming", "deniers", ",", "meaning", "the", "religious", "right", "allies", "of", "polluters", "who", "do", "n't", "want", "to", "spend", "the", "money", "necessary", "to", "clean", "up", "emissions", ".", "that", "was", "the", "beauty", "of", "alec", "and", "other", "501", "c", "entities", ",", "many", "set", "up", "by", "the", "koch", "brothers", "and", "friends", ",", "they", "hid", "the", "donors", ".", "hence", "the", "uproar", "over", "irs", "scrutiny", ",", "and", "republicans", "cutting", "irs", "funding", "." ]
the ability to not pay overtime to salaried works plays a huge role as well . much cheaper to have a few people working 5060 hours a week but only being paid for essentially 40 while you use part timers to fill in the gaps .	ct34k7t	politics	2,015	the ability to not pay overtime to salaried works plays a huge role as well . much cheaper to have a few people working 5060 hours a week but only being paid for essentially 40 while you use @@part timers## to fill in the gaps .	the ability to not pay overtime to salaried works plays a huge role as well . much cheaper to have a few @@people working 5060 hours a week## but only being paid for essentially 40 while you use @@part timers## to fill in the gaps .	the ability to not pay overtime to salaried works plays a huge role as well . much cheaper to have a few @@people working 5060 hours a week## but only being paid for essentially 40 while you use @@part timers## to fill in the gaps .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "the", "ability", "to", "not", "pay", "overtime", "to", "salaried", "works", "plays", "a", "huge", "role", "as", "well", ".", "much", "cheaper", "to", "have", "a", "few", "people", "working", "5060", "hours", "a", "week", "but", "only", "being", "paid", "for", "essentially", "40", "while", "you", "use", "part", "timers", "to", "fill", "in", "the", "gaps", "." ]
what do you consider demeaning ? that is entirely subjective .	cwk5hmy	politics	2,015	what do you consider demeaning ? that is entirely subjective .	what do you consider demeaning ? that is entirely subjective .	what do you consider demeaning ? that is entirely subjective .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "what", "do", "you", "consider", "demeaning", "?", "that", "is", "entirely", "subjective", "." ]
hillary clinton , like every other candidate ever , is trying to win endorsements . hillary clinton , like every other candidate ever , touts her endorsements . it seems like your real problem with this is that i you do n't like hillary clinton , and ii you do n't like that hillary clinton has been so much more successful than other candidates at winning endorsements . in short , you 're suffering from sour grapes .	cuk2ens	politics	2,015	hillary clinton , like every other candidate ever , is trying to win endorsements . hillary clinton , like every other candidate ever , touts her endorsements . it seems like your real problem with this is that i you do n't like hillary clinton , and ii you do n't like that hillary clinton has been so much more successful than other candidates at winning endorsements . in short , you 're suffering from sour grapes .	hillary clinton , like every other candidate ever , is trying to win endorsements . hillary clinton , like every other candidate ever , touts her endorsements . it seems like your real problem with this is that i you do n't like hillary clinton , and ii you do n't like that hillary clinton has been so much more successful than other @@candidates## at winning endorsements . in short , you 're suffering from sour grapes .	hillary clinton , like every other candidate ever , is trying to win endorsements . hillary clinton , like every other candidate ever , touts her endorsements . it seems like your real problem with this is that i you do n't like hillary clinton , and ii you do n't like that hillary clinton has been so much more successful than other @@candidates## at winning endorsements . in short , you 're suffering from sour grapes .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "hillary", "clinton", ",", "like", "every", "other", "candidate", "ever", ",", "is", "trying", "to", "win", "endorsements", ".", "hillary", "clinton", ",", "like", "every", "other", "candidate", "ever", ",", "touts", "her", "endorsements", ".", "it", "seems", "like", "your", "real", "problem", "with", "this", "is", "that", "i", "you", "do", "n't", "like", "hillary", "clinton", ",", "and", "ii", "you", "do", "n't", "like", "that", "hillary", "clinton", "has", "been", "so", "much", "more", "successful", "than", "other", "candidates", "at", "winning", "endorsements", ".", "in", "short", ",", "you", "'re", "suffering", "from", "sour", "grapes", "." ]
well duh . ffs , look at america 's right reich wing .	cxwydku	politics	2,015	well duh . ffs , look at @@america 's right reich wing## .	well duh . ffs , look at @@america 's## right reich wing .	well duh . ffs , look at @@america 's right reich wing## .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "I", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0 ]	[ "well", "duh", ".", "ffs", ",", "look", "at", "america", "'s", "right", "reich", "wing", "." ]
rule zero of SUBREDDIT for the next several weeks if it 's not bernie sanders , nobody probably cares .	cqxvcq8	politics	2,015	rule zero of SUBREDDIT for the next several weeks if it 's not bernie sanders , nobody probably cares .	rule zero of SUBREDDIT for the next several weeks if it 's not bernie sanders , nobody probably cares .	rule zero of SUBREDDIT for the next several weeks if it 's not bernie sanders , nobody probably cares .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "rule", "zero", "of", "SUBREDDIT", "for", "the", "next", "several", "weeks", "if", "it", "'s", "not", "bernie", "sanders", ",", "nobody", "probably", "cares", "." ]
those big glasses were supposed to make him look smarter . he needs to wear those big glasses over his mouth , shutting him up is the only way to make him seem smarter .	csctk5p	politics	2,015	those big glasses were supposed to make him look smarter . he needs to wear those big glasses over his mouth , shutting him up is the only way to make him seem smarter .	those big glasses were supposed to make him look smarter . he needs to wear those big glasses over his mouth , shutting him up is the only way to make him seem smarter .	those big glasses were supposed to make him look smarter . he needs to wear those big glasses over his mouth , shutting him up is the only way to make him seem smarter .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "those", "big", "glasses", "were", "supposed", "to", "make", "him", "look", "smarter", ".", "he", "needs", "to", "wear", "those", "big", "glasses", "over", "his", "mouth", ",", "shutting", "him", "up", "is", "the", "only", "way", "to", "make", "him", "seem", "smarter", "." ]
everyone knows it , but one party is still pretty much completely against it . let 's not forget that in the upcoming elections .	d4yurcs	politics	2,016	everyone knows it , but one party is still pretty much completely against it . let 's not forget that in the upcoming elections .	everyone knows it , but one party is still pretty much completely against it . let 's not forget that in the upcoming elections .	everyone knows it , but one party is still pretty much completely against it . let 's not forget that in the upcoming elections .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "everyone", "knows", "it", ",", "but", "one", "party", "is", "still", "pretty", "much", "completely", "against", "it", ".", "let", "'s", "not", "forget", "that", "in", "the", "upcoming", "elections", "." ]
or goldman sachs but she ca n't mention them .	czn64pm	politics	2,016	or goldman sachs but she ca n't mention them .	or @@goldman sachs## but she ca n't mention them .	or @@goldman sachs## but she ca n't mention them .	[ "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "or", "goldman", "sachs", "but", "she", "ca", "n't", "mention", "them", "." ]
bernie supporter here too . just was always realistic though that a democratic socialist was going to be a long shot . and yes this sub has entered critical circlejerk mass .	d0gels5	politics	2,016	bernie supporter here too . just was always realistic though that a democratic socialist was going to be a long shot . and yes this sub has entered critical circlejerk mass .	bernie supporter here too . just was always realistic though that a democratic socialist was going to be a long shot . and yes this sub has entered critical circlejerk mass .	bernie supporter here too . just was always realistic though that a democratic socialist was going to be a long shot . and yes this sub has entered critical circlejerk mass .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "bernie", "supporter", "here", "too", ".", "just", "was", "always", "realistic", "though", "that", "a", "democratic", "socialist", "was", "going", "to", "be", "a", "long", "shot", ".", "and", "yes", "this", "sub", "has", "entered", "critical", "circlejerk", "mass", "." ]
i heard the judge once posted a positive yelp review of a taco bell , therefore she is obviously biased against trump and unqualified to be a judge .	d9rlizm	politics	2,016	i heard the judge once posted a positive yelp review of a taco bell , therefore she is obviously biased against trump and unqualified to be a judge .	i heard the judge once posted a positive yelp review of a taco bell , therefore she is obviously biased against trump and unqualified to be a judge .	i heard the judge once posted a positive yelp review of a taco bell , therefore she is obviously biased against trump and unqualified to be a judge .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "i", "heard", "the", "judge", "once", "posted", "a", "positive", "yelp", "review", "of", "a", "taco", "bell", ",", "therefore", "she", "is", "obviously", "biased", "against", "trump", "and", "unqualified", "to", "be", "a", "judge", "." ]
these are two issues where one does n't cancel the other out . the ig reports from the state department state that she never asked for approval from the official channels for this server . this sets the precedent that you can get away with this as long as you claim no intent . the idea of foia was to make our government transparent to the public so we could respond to issues like a rogue server exposed to foreign powers . when the president , fbi , the public give her a free pass without even a slap on the wrist it tells us as long as you 're powerful enough the law can not touch you . again the blackberry was the small thing that led to the real issue that is the server . if you want to talk about blackberries or personal email addresses fine but talk about the issue of a secretary of state without any approval from the chain of command setting up an un secure server literally in the basement of her ny domestic home with the help of a random ass it guy while that is going on good civil servants and soldiers are jailed for lesser acts that were accidental . please , let 's talk about why this is just getting a pass from the people like it 's just no fucking big deal .	d5yw1b0	politics	2,016	these are two issues where one does n't cancel the other out . the ig reports from the @@state department## state that she never asked for approval from the official channels for this server . this sets the precedent that you can get away with this as long as you claim no intent . the idea of foia was to make our government transparent to @@the public## so we could respond to issues like a rogue server exposed to foreign powers . when the president , @@fbi## , @@the public## give her a free pass without even a slap on the wrist it tells us as long as you 're powerful enough the law can not touch you . again the blackberry was the small thing that led to the real issue that is the server . if you want to talk about blackberries or personal email addresses fine but talk about the issue of a secretary of state without any approval from @@the chain of command## setting up an un secure server literally in the basement of her ny domestic home with the help of a random ass it guy while that is going on good @@civil servants## and @@soldiers## are jailed for lesser acts that were accidental . please , let 's talk about why this is just getting a pass from the people like it 's just no fucking big deal .	these are two issues where one does n't cancel the other out . the ig reports from the state department state that she never asked for approval from the official channels for this server . this sets the precedent that you can get away with this as long as you claim no intent . the idea of foia was to make our government transparent to the public so we could respond to issues like a rogue server exposed to foreign powers . when the president , @@fbi## , the public give her a free pass without even a slap on the wrist it tells us as long as you 're powerful enough the law can not touch you . again the blackberry was the small thing that led to the real issue that is the server . if you want to talk about blackberries or personal email addresses fine but talk about the issue of a secretary of state without any approval from the chain of command setting up an un secure server literally in the basement of her ny domestic home with the help of a random ass it guy while that is going on @@good civil servants## and @@soldiers## are jailed for lesser acts that were accidental . please , let 's talk about why this is just getting a pass from the people like it 's just no fucking big deal .	these are two issues where one does n't cancel the other out . the ig reports from the state department state that she never asked for approval from the official channels for this server . this sets the precedent that you can get away with this as long as you claim no intent . the idea of foia was to make our government transparent to the public so we could respond to issues like a rogue server exposed to foreign powers . when the president , @@fbi## , the public give her a free pass without even a slap on the wrist it tells us as long as you 're powerful enough the law can not touch you . again the blackberry was the small thing that led to the real issue that is the server . if you want to talk about blackberries or personal email addresses fine but talk about the issue of a secretary of state without any approval from the chain of command setting up an un secure server literally in the basement of her ny domestic home with the help of a random ass it guy while that is going on @@good civil servants## and @@soldiers## are jailed for lesser acts that were accidental . please , let 's talk about why this is just getting a pass from the people like it 's just no fucking big deal .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "these", "are", "two", "issues", "where", "one", "does", "n't", "cancel", "the", "other", "out", ".", "the", "ig", "reports", "from", "the", "state", "department", "state", "that", "she", "never", "asked", "for", "approval", "from", "the", "official", "channels", "for", "this", "server", ".", "this", "sets", "the", "precedent", "that", "you", "can", "get", "away", "with", "this", "as", "long", "as", "you", "claim", "no", "intent", ".", "the", "idea", "of", "foia", "was", "to", "make", "our", "government", "transparent", "to", "the", "public", "so", "we", "could", "respond", "to", "issues", "like", "a", "rogue", "server", "exposed", "to", "foreign", "powers", ".", "when", "the", "president", ",", "fbi", ",", "the", "public", "give", "her", "a", "free", "pass", "without", "even", "a", "slap", "on", "the", "wrist", "it", "tells", "us", "as", "long", "as", "you", "'re", "powerful", "enough", "the", "law", "can", "not", "touch", "you", ".", "again", "the", "blackberry", "was", "the", "small", "thing", "that", "led", "to", "the", "real", "issue", "that", "is", "the", "server", ".", "if", "you", "want", "to", "talk", "about", "blackberries", "or", "personal", "email", "addresses", "fine", "but", "talk", "about", "the", "issue", "of", "a", "secretary", "of", "state", "without", "any", "approval", "from", "the", "chain", "of", "command", "setting", "up", "an", "un", "secure", "server", "literally", "in", "the", "basement", "of", "her", "ny", "domestic", "home", "with", "the", "help", "of", "a", "random", "ass", "it", "guy", "while", "that", "is", "going", "on", "good", "civil", "servants", "and", "soldiers", "are", "jailed", "for", "lesser", "acts", "that", "were", "accidental", ".", "please", ",", "let", "'s", "talk", "about", "why", "this", "is", "just", "getting", "a", "pass", "from", "the", "people", "like", "it", "'s", "just", "no", "fucking", "big", "deal", "." ]
there are plenty of instances where murder is 100 legal . then it is n't murder . murder is unlawful illegal killing .	d7vtoya	politics	2,016	there are plenty of instances where murder is 100 legal . then it is n't murder . murder is unlawful illegal killing .	there are plenty of instances where murder is 100 legal . then it is n't murder . murder is unlawful illegal killing .	there are plenty of instances where murder is 100 legal . then it is n't murder . murder is unlawful illegal killing .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "there", "are", "plenty", "of", "instances", "where", "murder", "is", "100", "legal", ".", "then", "it", "is", "n't", "murder", ".", "murder", "is", "unlawful", "illegal", "killing", "." ]
christ , he could crucify her if he 'd just put a modicum of effort into it . lazy . sad .	d4lqgms	politics	2,016	christ , he could crucify her if he 'd just put a modicum of effort into it . lazy . sad .	christ , he could crucify her if he 'd just put a modicum of effort into it . lazy . sad .	christ , he could crucify her if he 'd just put a modicum of effort into it . lazy . sad .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "christ", ",", "he", "could", "crucify", "her", "if", "he", "'d", "just", "put", "a", "modicum", "of", "effort", "into", "it", ".", "lazy", ".", "sad", "." ]
not always , as bernie has shown us . so ... what party does bernie vote for ? does money corrupt politicians ? yes or no ? this is correct . it 's both .	d2jrr4d	politics	2,016	not always , as bernie has shown us . so ... what party does bernie vote for ? does money corrupt @@politicians## ? yes or no ? this is correct . it 's both .	not always , as bernie has shown us . so ... what party does bernie vote for ? does money corrupt @@politicians## ? yes or no ? this is correct . it 's both .	not always , as bernie has shown us . so ... what party does bernie vote for ? does money corrupt @@politicians## ? yes or no ? this is correct . it 's both .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "not", "always", ",", "as", "bernie", "has", "shown", "us", ".", "so", "...", "what", "party", "does", "bernie", "vote", "for", "?", "does", "money", "corrupt", "politicians", "?", "yes", "or", "no", "?", "this", "is", "correct", ".", "it", "'s", "both", "." ]
where you conveniently ignore facts and try to convince yourself of shit that 's not true . you must be new here .	daphtln	politics	2,016	where you conveniently ignore facts and try to convince yourself of shit that 's not true . you must be new here .	where you conveniently ignore facts and try to convince yourself of shit that 's not true . you must be new here .	where you conveniently ignore facts and try to convince yourself of shit that 's not true . you must be new here .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "where", "you", "conveniently", "ignore", "facts", "and", "try", "to", "convince", "yourself", "of", "shit", "that", "'s", "not", "true", ".", "you", "must", "be", "new", "here", "." ]
ah yes , the long con . everything happens for a reason in politics . these people invest way to much time , effort , money for anything to happen at random . first thing i thought when obama met with sanders then endorsed clinton sanders just got something out of this , but what ? ''	d43we61	politics	2,016	ah yes , the long con . everything happens for a reason in politics . these people invest way to much time , effort , money for anything to happen at random . first thing i thought when obama met with sanders then endorsed clinton sanders just got something out of this , but what ? ''	ah yes , the long con . everything happens for a reason in politics . these people invest way to much time , effort , money for anything to happen at random . first thing i thought when obama met with sanders then endorsed clinton sanders just got something out of this , but what ? ''	ah yes , the long con . everything happens for a reason in politics . these people invest way to much time , effort , money for anything to happen at random . first thing i thought when obama met with sanders then endorsed clinton sanders just got something out of this , but what ? ''	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "ah", "yes", ",", "the", "long", "con", ".", "everything", "happens", "for", "a", "reason", "in", "politics", ".", "these", "people", "invest", "way", "to", "much", "time", ",", "effort", ",", "money", "for", "anything", "to", "happen", "at", "random", ".", "first", "thing", "i", "thought", "when", "obama", "met", "with", "sanders", "then", "endorsed", "clinton", "sanders", "just", "got", "something", "out", "of", "this", ",", "but", "what", "?", "``" ]
how has clinton taken 4.5m in fossil fuel money ? please provide sources because that claim is bullshit . the amount of money clinton has spent has been almost all through her campaign , a.k.a . individual donations . clinton 's super pacs are all saving for the general now that the primary race is over .	d1lgtrj	politics	2,016	how has clinton taken 4.5m in fossil fuel money ? please provide sources because that claim is bullshit . the amount of money clinton has spent has been almost all through her campaign , a.k.a . individual donations . clinton 's super pacs are all saving for the general now that the primary race is over .	how has clinton taken 4.5m in fossil fuel money ? please provide sources because that claim is bullshit . the amount of money clinton has spent has been almost all through her campaign , a.k.a . individual donations . clinton 's super pacs are all saving for the general now that the primary race is over .	how has clinton taken 4.5m in fossil fuel money ? please provide sources because that claim is bullshit . the amount of money clinton has spent has been almost all through her campaign , a.k.a . individual donations . clinton 's super pacs are all saving for the general now that the primary race is over .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "how", "has", "clinton", "taken", "4.5m", "in", "fossil", "fuel", "money", "?", "please", "provide", "sources", "because", "that", "claim", "is", "bullshit", ".", "the", "amount", "of", "money", "clinton", "has", "spent", "has", "been", "almost", "all", "through", "her", "campaign", ",", "a.k.a", ".", "individual", "donations", ".", "clinton", "'s", "super", "pacs", "are", "all", "saving", "for", "the", "general", "now", "that", "the", "primary", "race", "is", "over", "." ]
he also constantly talks about 'reaching across the aisle ' despite the evidence that this would get him nowhere . yes , obama talks . what does he do ? did he start using republican talking points and pass half their agenda for nothing in return ? no . that 's what bill did . obama talked about compromise but only if the republicans agreed to support major progressive accomplishments . they said no and obama held the line by not passing their agenda like bill did . the difference between the two is significant .	d985emt	politics	2,016	he also constantly talks about 'reaching across the aisle ' despite the evidence that this would get him nowhere . yes , obama talks . what does he do ? did he start using republican talking points and pass half their agenda for nothing in return ? no . that 's what bill did . obama talked about compromise but only if the @@republicans## agreed to support major progressive accomplishments . they said no and obama held the line by not passing their agenda like bill did . the difference between the two is significant .	he also constantly talks about 'reaching across the aisle ' despite the evidence that this would get him nowhere . yes , obama talks . what does he do ? did he start using republican talking points and pass half their agenda for nothing in return ? no . that 's what bill did . obama talked about compromise but only if the @@republicans## agreed to support major progressive accomplishments . they said no and obama held the line by not passing their agenda like bill did . the difference between the two is significant .	he also constantly talks about 'reaching across the aisle ' despite the evidence that this would get him nowhere . yes , obama talks . what does he do ? did he start using republican talking points and pass half their agenda for nothing in return ? no . that 's what bill did . obama talked about compromise but only if the @@republicans## agreed to support major progressive accomplishments . they said no and obama held the line by not passing their agenda like bill did . the difference between the two is significant .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "he", "also", "constantly", "talks", "about", "'reaching", "across", "the", "aisle", "'", "despite", "the", "evidence", "that", "this", "would", "get", "him", "nowhere", ".", "yes", ",", "obama", "talks", ".", "what", "does", "he", "do", "?", "did", "he", "start", "using", "republican", "talking", "points", "and", "pass", "half", "their", "agenda", "for", "nothing", "in", "return", "?", "no", ".", "that", "'s", "what", "bill", "did", ".", "obama", "talked", "about", "compromise", "but", "only", "if", "the", "republicans", "agreed", "to", "support", "major", "progressive", "accomplishments", ".", "they", "said", "no", "and", "obama", "held", "the", "line", "by", "not", "passing", "their", "agenda", "like", "bill", "did", ".", "the", "difference", "between", "the", "two", "is", "significant", "." ]
or asking why we are n't using nuclear weapons .	d7p6m6v	politics	2,016	or asking why we are n't using nuclear weapons .	or asking why we are n't using nuclear weapons .	or asking why we are n't using nuclear weapons .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "or", "asking", "why", "we", "are", "n't", "using", "nuclear", "weapons", "." ]
jesus dude you just got called out , proven you were wrong , and you decide that instead of just admitting you 're wrong , you bring out a bunch of strawmen and act like an ass . just stop , this is painful .	d3gnijv	politics	2,016	jesus dude you just got called out , proven you were wrong , and you decide that instead of just admitting you 're wrong , you bring out a bunch of strawmen and act like an ass . just stop , this is painful .	jesus dude you just got called out , proven you were wrong , and you decide that instead of just admitting you 're wrong , you bring out a bunch of strawmen and act like an ass . just stop , this is painful .	jesus dude you just got called out , proven you were wrong , and you decide that instead of just admitting you 're wrong , you bring out a bunch of strawmen and act like an ass . just stop , this is painful .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "jesus", "dude", "you", "just", "got", "called", "out", ",", "proven", "you", "were", "wrong", ",", "and", "you", "decide", "that", "instead", "of", "just", "admitting", "you", "'re", "wrong", ",", "you", "bring", "out", "a", "bunch", "of", "strawmen", "and", "act", "like", "an", "ass", ".", "just", "stop", ",", "this", "is", "painful", "." ]
they 've made fun of every other president for the past four decades , why not trump ? for that matter , all the other presidents responded maturely , why not trump ?	darqmhg	politics	2,016	they 've made fun of every other president for the past four decades , why not trump ? for that matter , all the other @@presidents## responded maturely , why not trump ?	they 've made fun of every other president for the past four decades , why not trump ? for that matter , all the other @@presidents## responded maturely , why not trump ?	they 've made fun of every other president for the past four decades , why not trump ? for that matter , all the other @@presidents## responded maturely , why not trump ?	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "they", "'ve", "made", "fun", "of", "every", "other", "president", "for", "the", "past", "four", "decades", ",", "why", "not", "trump", "?", "for", "that", "matter", ",", "all", "the", "other", "presidents", "responded", "maturely", ",", "why", "not", "trump", "?" ]
cost of the war on drugs agreed . maybe it 's time we take a step back and review some department policies . training some police officers improperly . that 's pretty hard to say . if i got a 911 call from somebody saying a guy on main street was pointing a gun at people i would have a lot itchier trigger finger . thankfully i 'm not a police officer and do n't have to be presented with situations like that where i feel my life could be in danger . i 'm sure trump and clinton will fix the hateful rhetoric that there is . black humor at it 's finest .	d53ubir	politics	2,016	cost of the war on drugs agreed . maybe it 's time we take a step back and review some department policies . training some @@police officers## improperly . that 's pretty hard to say . if i got a 911 call from somebody saying a guy on main street was pointing a gun at people i would have a lot itchier trigger finger . thankfully i 'm not a police officer and do n't have to be presented with situations like that where i feel my life could be in danger . i 'm sure trump and clinton will fix the hateful rhetoric that there is . black humor at it 's finest .	cost of the war on drugs agreed . maybe it 's time we take a step back and review some department policies . training some @@police officers## improperly . that 's pretty hard to say . if i got a 911 call from somebody saying a guy on main street was pointing a gun at people i would have a lot itchier trigger finger . thankfully i 'm not a police officer and do n't have to be presented with situations like that where i feel my life could be in danger . i 'm sure trump and clinton will fix the hateful rhetoric that there is . black humor at it 's finest .	cost of the war on drugs agreed . maybe it 's time we take a step back and review some department policies . training some @@police officers## improperly . that 's pretty hard to say . if i got a 911 call from somebody saying a guy on main street was pointing a gun at people i would have a lot itchier trigger finger . thankfully i 'm not a police officer and do n't have to be presented with situations like that where i feel my life could be in danger . i 'm sure trump and clinton will fix the hateful rhetoric that there is . black humor at it 's finest .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "cost", "of", "the", "war", "on", "drugs", "agreed", ".", "maybe", "it", "'s", "time", "we", "take", "a", "step", "back", "and", "review", "some", "department", "policies", ".", "training", "some", "police", "officers", "improperly", ".", "that", "'s", "pretty", "hard", "to", "say", ".", "if", "i", "got", "a", "911", "call", "from", "somebody", "saying", "a", "guy", "on", "main", "street", "was", "pointing", "a", "gun", "at", "people", "i", "would", "have", "a", "lot", "itchier", "trigger", "finger", ".", "thankfully", "i", "'m", "not", "a", "police", "officer", "and", "do", "n't", "have", "to", "be", "presented", "with", "situations", "like", "that", "where", "i", "feel", "my", "life", "could", "be", "in", "danger", ".", "i", "'m", "sure", "trump", "and", "clinton", "will", "fix", "the", "hateful", "rhetoric", "that", "there", "is", ".", "black", "humor", "at", "it", "'s", "finest", "." ]
because ted cruz is far fucking worse than trump .	d2rgnpn	politics	2,016	because ted cruz is far fucking worse than trump .	because ted cruz is far fucking worse than trump .	because ted cruz is far fucking worse than trump .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "because", "ted", "cruz", "is", "far", "fucking", "worse", "than", "trump", "." ]
my principle is this i 'm a progressive , i supported bernie sanders , and i 'd rather have someone who is a liberal as president then someone who is actively regressive . to me , voting for hillary is the most principled thing you can do .	d9q9v27	politics	2,016	my principle is this i 'm a progressive , i supported bernie sanders , and i 'd rather have someone who is a liberal as president then someone who is actively regressive . to me , voting for hillary is the most principled thing you can do .	my principle is this i 'm a progressive , i supported bernie sanders , and i 'd rather have someone who is a liberal as president then someone who is actively regressive . to me , voting for hillary is the most principled thing you can do .	my principle is this i 'm a progressive , i supported bernie sanders , and i 'd rather have someone who is a liberal as president then someone who is actively regressive . to me , voting for hillary is the most principled thing you can do .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "my", "principle", "is", "this", "i", "'m", "a", "progressive", ",", "i", "supported", "bernie", "sanders", ",", "and", "i", "'d", "rather", "have", "someone", "who", "is", "a", "liberal", "as", "president", "then", "someone", "who", "is", "actively", "regressive", ".", "to", "me", ",", "voting", "for", "hillary", "is", "the", "most", "principled", "thing", "you", "can", "do", "." ]
hi jpurdy . thank you for participating in SUBREDDIT . however , your submission has been removed for the following reason already submitted an earlier duplicate of this post received some upvotes URL i 'm a bot and sometimes i make mistakes . if you have any questions about this removal , please feel free to message the moderators . URL regarding the removal of this submission by USER messagei have a question regarding the removal of this submission . URL	d0w216y	politics	2,016	hi jpurdy . thank you for participating in SUBREDDIT . however , your submission has been removed for the following reason already submitted an earlier duplicate of this post received some upvotes URL i 'm a bot and sometimes i make mistakes . if you have any questions about this removal , please feel free to message the moderators . URL regarding the removal of this submission by USER messagei have a question regarding the removal of this submission . URL	hi jpurdy . thank you for participating in SUBREDDIT . however , your submission has been removed for the following reason already submitted an earlier duplicate of this post received some upvotes URL i 'm a bot and sometimes i make mistakes . if you have any questions about this removal , please feel free to message the moderators . URL regarding the removal of this submission by USER messagei have a question regarding the removal of this submission . URL	hi jpurdy . thank you for participating in SUBREDDIT . however , your submission has been removed for the following reason already submitted an earlier duplicate of this post received some upvotes URL i 'm a bot and sometimes i make mistakes . if you have any questions about this removal , please feel free to message the moderators . URL regarding the removal of this submission by USER messagei have a question regarding the removal of this submission . URL	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "hi", "jpurdy", ".", "thank", "you", "for", "participating", "in", "SUBREDDIT", ".", "however", ",", "your", "submission", "has", "been", "removed", "for", "the", "following", "reason", "already", "submitted", "an", "earlier", "duplicate", "of", "this", "post", "received", "some", "upvotes", "URL", "i", "'m", "a", "bot", "and", "sometimes", "i", "make", "mistakes", ".", "if", "you", "have", "any", "questions", "about", "this", "removal", ",", "please", "feel", "free", "to", "message", "the", "moderators", ".", "URL", "regarding", "the", "removal", "of", "this", "submission", "by", "USER", "messagei", "have", "a", "question", "regarding", "the", "removal", "of", "this", "submission", ".", "URL" ]
nope we will not elect kings in this country ! that 's why we have the divisions of power in the constitution !	d3n0lqn	politics	2,016	nope we will not elect @@kings## in this country ! that 's why we have the divisions of power in the constitution !	nope we will not elect kings in this country ! that 's why we have the divisions of power in the constitution !	nope we will not elect @@kings## in this country ! that 's why we have the divisions of power in the constitution !	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "nope", "we", "will", "not", "elect", "kings", "in", "this", "country", "!", "that", "'s", "why", "we", "have", "the", "divisions", "of", "power", "in", "the", "constitution", "!" ]
sure . i would like to vote for josiah bartlet . i mean in the current reality .	d5k6v1o	politics	2,016	sure . i would like to vote for josiah bartlet . i mean in the current reality .	sure . i would like to vote for josiah bartlet . i mean in the current reality .	sure . i would like to vote for josiah bartlet . i mean in the current reality .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "sure", ".", "i", "would", "like", "to", "vote", "for", "josiah", "bartlet", ".", "i", "mean", "in", "the", "current", "reality", "." ]
at first it was lesser of two evils for me . i voted for bernie , and i still love that man . however , after looking into facts on clinton , i do think she would make a good president in theory . listening , in my opinion , is the most important skill a leader can posses . from every account , hillary is an exceptional listener , she even did listening tours with her time in the senate . most of the shit that drips off clinton is shit the right has thrown at her since the '90s . unfortunately , i think that is what is going to lead to her having a rough presidency . similar to australia 's first female prime minister , iirc the media crucified her . i know a lot of us have this feeling that hillary will be able to work with the republicans , but i see no reason for them to stop their obstructionism . it is well documented that they work well together in back rooms , and they paint her as satan in public . who knows , maybe trump snaps them back into reality .	d8j2uj2	politics	2,016	at first it was lesser of two evils for me . i voted for bernie , and i still love that man . however , after looking into facts on clinton , i do think she would make a good president in theory . listening , in my opinion , is the most important skill a leader can posses . from every account , hillary is an exceptional listener , she even did listening tours with her time in @@the senate## . most of the shit that drips off clinton is shit @@the right## has thrown at her since the '90s . unfortunately , i think that is what is going to lead to her having a rough presidency . similar to australia 's first female prime minister , iirc the media crucified her . i know a lot of us have this feeling that hillary will be able to work with the @@republicans## , but i see no reason for them to stop their obstructionism . it is well documented that they work well together in back rooms , and they paint her as satan in public . who knows , maybe trump snaps them back into reality .	at first it was lesser of two evils for me . i voted for bernie , and i still love that man . however , after looking into facts on clinton , i do think she would make a good president in theory . listening , in my opinion , is the most important skill a leader can posses . from every account , hillary is an exceptional listener , she even did listening tours with her time in the senate . most of the shit that drips off clinton is shit the right has thrown at her since the '90s . unfortunately , i think that is what is going to lead to her having a rough presidency . similar to australia 's first female prime minister , iirc the media crucified her . i know a lot of us have this feeling that hillary will be able to work with the republicans , but i see no reason for them to stop their obstructionism . it is well documented that they work well together in back rooms , and they paint her as satan in public . who knows , maybe trump snaps them back into reality .	at first it was lesser of two evils for me . i voted for bernie , and i still love that man . however , after looking into facts on clinton , i do think she would make a good president in theory . listening , in my opinion , is the most important skill a leader can posses . from every account , hillary is an exceptional listener , she even did listening tours with her time in @@the senate## . most of the shit that drips off clinton is shit @@the right## has thrown at her since the '90s . unfortunately , i think that is what is going to lead to her having a rough presidency . similar to australia 's first female prime minister , iirc the media crucified her . i know a lot of us have this feeling that hillary will be able to work with the @@republicans## , but i see no reason for them to stop their obstructionism . it is well documented that they work well together in back rooms , and they paint her as satan in public . who knows , maybe trump snaps them back into reality .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "at", "first", "it", "was", "lesser", "of", "two", "evils", "for", "me", ".", "i", "voted", "for", "bernie", ",", "and", "i", "still", "love", "that", "man", ".", "however", ",", "after", "looking", "into", "facts", "on", "clinton", ",", "i", "do", "think", "she", "would", "make", "a", "good", "president", "in", "theory", ".", "listening", ",", "in", "my", "opinion", ",", "is", "the", "most", "important", "skill", "a", "leader", "can", "posses", ".", "from", "every", "account", ",", "hillary", "is", "an", "exceptional", "listener", ",", "she", "even", "did", "listening", "tours", "with", "her", "time", "in", "the", "senate", ".", "most", "of", "the", "shit", "that", "drips", "off", "clinton", "is", "shit", "the", "right", "has", "thrown", "at", "her", "since", "the", "'90s", ".", "unfortunately", ",", "i", "think", "that", "is", "what", "is", "going", "to", "lead", "to", "her", "having", "a", "rough", "presidency", ".", "similar", "to", "australia", "'s", "first", "female", "prime", "minister", ",", "iirc", "the", "media", "crucified", "her", ".", "i", "know", "a", "lot", "of", "us", "have", "this", "feeling", "that", "hillary", "will", "be", "able", "to", "work", "with", "the", "republicans", ",", "but", "i", "see", "no", "reason", "for", "them", "to", "stop", "their", "obstructionism", ".", "it", "is", "well", "documented", "that", "they", "work", "well", "together", "in", "back", "rooms", ",", "and", "they", "paint", "her", "as", "satan", "in", "public", ".", "who", "knows", ",", "maybe", "trump", "snaps", "them", "back", "into", "reality", "." ]
meanwhile trump gets the negative headlines . obama can fart on a reporter and they are so afraid to be censored that they have to write flowers and rainbows .	d0dlkoh	politics	2,016	meanwhile trump gets the negative headlines . obama can fart on a reporter and they are so afraid to be censored that they have to write flowers and rainbows .	meanwhile trump gets the negative headlines . obama can fart on a reporter and they are so afraid to be censored that they have to write flowers and rainbows .	meanwhile trump gets the negative headlines . obama can fart on a reporter and they are so afraid to be censored that they have to write flowers and rainbows .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "meanwhile", "trump", "gets", "the", "negative", "headlines", ".", "obama", "can", "fart", "on", "a", "reporter", "and", "they", "are", "so", "afraid", "to", "be", "censored", "that", "they", "have", "to", "write", "flowers", "and", "rainbows", "." ]
none of that involved illegal activity . controversy is not scandal	d82hfm5	politics	2,016	none of that involved illegal activity . controversy is not scandal	none of that involved illegal activity . controversy is not scandal	none of that involved illegal activity . controversy is not scandal	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "none", "of", "that", "involved", "illegal", "activity", ".", "controversy", "is", "not", "scandal" ]
ever do it for a doctor ? it 's like they do n't want to learn for fear of losing their doctoring abilities ...	d2unybf	politics	2,016	ever do it for a doctor ? it 's like they do n't want to learn for fear of losing their doctoring abilities ...	ever do it for a doctor ? it 's like they do n't want to learn for fear of losing their doctoring abilities ...	ever do it for a doctor ? it 's like they do n't want to learn for fear of losing their doctoring abilities ...	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "ever", "do", "it", "for", "a", "doctor", "?", "it", "'s", "like", "they", "do", "n't", "want", "to", "learn", "for", "fear", "of", "losing", "their", "doctoring", "abilities", "..." ]
that 's about as likely as a president maduro '' . in case you missed , the effect of socialism are on full display and the american people are wise enough to just say no .	d3kn4fr	politics	2,016	that 's about as likely as a president maduro '' . in case you missed , the effect of socialism are on full display and the @@american people## are wise enough to just say no .	that 's about as likely as a president maduro '' . in case you missed , the effect of socialism are on full display and the @@american people## are wise enough to just say no .	that 's about as likely as a president maduro '' . in case you missed , the effect of socialism are on full display and the @@american people## are wise enough to just say no .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "that", "'s", "about", "as", "likely", "as", "a", "president", "maduro", "``", ".", "in", "case", "you", "missed", ",", "the", "effect", "of", "socialism", "are", "on", "full", "display", "and", "the", "american", "people", "are", "wise", "enough", "to", "just", "say", "no", "." ]
and how do you feel that she took advantage of the war that was ongoing in bosnia for political gain when she claimed she landed in bosnia whilst under sniper fire ?	d4k2o2t	politics	2,016	and how do you feel that she took advantage of the war that was ongoing in bosnia for political gain when she claimed she landed in bosnia whilst under sniper fire ?	and how do you feel that she took advantage of the war that was ongoing in bosnia for political gain when she claimed she landed in bosnia whilst under sniper fire ?	and how do you feel that she took advantage of the war that was ongoing in bosnia for political gain when she claimed she landed in bosnia whilst under sniper fire ?	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "and", "how", "do", "you", "feel", "that", "she", "took", "advantage", "of", "the", "war", "that", "was", "ongoing", "in", "bosnia", "for", "political", "gain", "when", "she", "claimed", "she", "landed", "in", "bosnia", "whilst", "under", "sniper", "fire", "?" ]
i agree with what the article is stating . i will be voting 3rd party unless its clinton vs cruz . then i might shoot myself . but , i 've seen some clinton supporters say the very thing i posted about the dem primary . it 's meant to sap morale of bernie supporters . i believe it does the opposite .	d1qqkqz	politics	2,016	i agree with what the article is stating . i will be voting 3rd party unless its clinton vs cruz . then i might shoot myself . but , i 've seen some @@clinton supporters## say the very thing i posted about the dem primary . it 's meant to sap morale of @@bernie supporters## . i believe it does the opposite .	i agree with what the article is stating . i will be voting 3rd party unless its clinton vs cruz . then i might shoot myself . but , i 've seen some @@clinton supporters## say the very thing i posted about the dem primary . it 's meant to sap morale of @@bernie supporters## . i believe it does the opposite .	i agree with what the article is stating . i will be voting 3rd party unless its clinton vs cruz . then i might shoot myself . but , i 've seen some @@clinton supporters## say the very thing i posted about the dem primary . it 's meant to sap morale of @@bernie supporters## . i believe it does the opposite .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "i", "agree", "with", "what", "the", "article", "is", "stating", ".", "i", "will", "be", "voting", "3rd", "party", "unless", "its", "clinton", "vs", "cruz", ".", "then", "i", "might", "shoot", "myself", ".", "but", ",", "i", "'ve", "seen", "some", "clinton", "supporters", "say", "the", "very", "thing", "i", "posted", "about", "the", "dem", "primary", ".", "it", "'s", "meant", "to", "sap", "morale", "of", "bernie", "supporters", ".", "i", "believe", "it", "does", "the", "opposite", "." ]
give me reasons to dislike hillary . why should n't i vote for her instead of gary or even trump	d5r1sbu	politics	2,016	give me reasons to dislike hillary . why should n't i vote for her instead of gary or even trump	give me reasons to dislike hillary . why should n't i vote for her instead of gary or even trump	give me reasons to dislike hillary . why should n't i vote for her instead of gary or even trump	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "give", "me", "reasons", "to", "dislike", "hillary", ".", "why", "should", "n't", "i", "vote", "for", "her", "instead", "of", "gary", "or", "even", "trump" ]
no we 're not voting for the corrupt queen which cheated us .	d9nkczj	politics	2,016	no we 're not voting for the corrupt queen which cheated us .	no we 're not voting for the corrupt queen which cheated us .	no we 're not voting for the corrupt queen which cheated us .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "no", "we", "'re", "not", "voting", "for", "the", "corrupt", "queen", "which", "cheated", "us", "." ]
ben carson ai n't in the cabinet , the white house or the justice dpt , dude . best look over your answer sheet for errors there .	dalk194	politics	2,016	ben carson ai n't in @@the cabinet## , @@the white house## or the @@justice dpt## , dude . best look over your answer sheet for errors there .	ben carson ai n't in the cabinet , the white house or the justice dpt , dude . best look over your answer sheet for errors there .	ben carson ai n't in @@the cabinet## , @@the white house## or the @@justice dpt## , dude . best look over your answer sheet for errors there .	[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]	[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]	[ "ben", "carson", "ai", "n't", "in", "the", "cabinet", ",", "the", "white", "house", "or", "the", "justice", "dpt", ",", "dude", ".", "best", "look", "over", "your", "answer", "sheet", "for", "errors", "there", "." ]

so the state government is passing government regulations limiting what local governments can do with items they purchase . exactly how does this fit in with the small government mantra of the republican party ? ? ?

c9pvir4

politics

2,013

so the @@state government## is passing government regulations limiting what local governments can do with items they purchase . exactly how does this fit in with the small government mantra of the @@republican party## ? ? ?

so the @@state government## is passing government regulations limiting what @@local governments## can do with items they purchase . exactly how does this fit in with the small government mantra of the @@republican party## ? ? ?

[ "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "so", "the", "state", "government", "is", "passing", "government", "regulations", "limiting", "what", "local", "governments", "can", "do", "with", "items", "they", "purchase", ".", "exactly", "how", "does", "this", "fit", "in", "with", "the", "small", "government", "mantra", "of", "the", "republican", "party", "?", "?", "?" ]

they lose the power to nickel and dime customers to death though .

cbdxpfl

politics

2,013

they lose the power to nickel and dime customers to death though .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "they", "lose", "the", "power", "to", "nickel", "and", "dime", "customers", "to", "death", "though", "." ]

so go ahead and show us the data on what you read '' . i read ... '' is worth exactly zero around here . facts and data please .

cbwhm5h

politics

2,013

so go ahead and show us the data on what you read '' . i read ... '' is worth exactly zero around here . facts and data please .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "so", "go", "ahead", "and", "show", "us", "the", "data", "on", "what", "you", "read", "``", ".", "i", "read", "...", "``", "is", "worth", "exactly", "zero", "around", "here", ".", "facts", "and", "data", "please", "." ]

is media matters biased ? do they have an agenda themselves ?

ckmoo5g

politics

2,014

is media matters biased ? do they have an agenda themselves ?

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "is", "media", "matters", "biased", "?", "do", "they", "have", "an", "agenda", "themselves", "?" ]

one of my biggest frustrations with obama is his failure to understand the need to keep dangerous people off the streets .

ci8jtov

politics

2,014

one of my biggest frustrations with obama is his failure to understand the need to keep dangerous people off the streets .

one of my biggest frustrations with obama is his failure to understand the need to keep @@dangerous people## off the streets .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "one", "of", "my", "biggest", "frustrations", "with", "obama", "is", "his", "failure", "to", "understand", "the", "need", "to", "keep", "dangerous", "people", "off", "the", "streets", "." ]

four hours in class before lunch , then four more hours locked down . 8 hours .

chy4l8z

politics

2,014

four hours in class before lunch , then four more hours locked down . 8 hours .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "four", "hours", "in", "class", "before", "lunch", ",", "then", "four", "more", "hours", "locked", "down", ".", "8", "hours", "." ]

i do n't think you answered my question either schmuck . there 's a real problem , there 's real crimes being perpetrated by our own agencies , and then there 's the messenger who is being loyal to his people , not the people who process his paycheck . i do n't care if the messenger broke the slaver 's law . explain to me why anyone should ? what angle do you have here ? '' what angle does anyone have for going after snowden ahead of the nsa , unless , they also process your paycheck . we would n't have had a single revolution on this planet or started putting an end to outright slavery without people like this . snowden 's a real american hero , oohrah !

chvlr5q

politics

2,014

i do n't think you answered my question either schmuck . there 's a real problem , there 's real crimes being perpetrated by our own agencies , and then there 's the messenger who is being loyal to his people , not the people who process his paycheck . i do n't care if the messenger broke the slaver 's law . explain to me why anyone should ? what angle do you have here ? '' what angle does anyone have for going after snowden ahead of the nsa , unless , they also process your paycheck . we would n't have had a single revolution on this planet or started putting an end to outright slavery without people like this . snowden 's a real american hero , oohrah !

i do n't think you answered my question either schmuck . there 's a real problem , there 's real crimes being perpetrated by our own agencies , and then there 's the messenger who is being loyal to his people , not the people who process his paycheck . i do n't care if the messenger broke the slaver 's law . explain to me why anyone should ? what angle do you have here ? '' what angle does anyone have for going after snowden ahead of the @@nsa## , unless , they also process your paycheck . we would n't have had a single revolution on this planet or started putting an end to outright slavery without people like this . snowden 's a real american hero , oohrah !

i do n't think you answered my question either schmuck . there 's a real problem , there 's real crimes being perpetrated by our own agencies , and then there 's the messenger who is being loyal to his people , not the people who process his paycheck . i do n't care if the messenger broke the slaver 's law . explain to me why anyone should ? what angle do you have here ? '' what angle does anyone have for going after snowden ahead of @@the nsa## , unless , they also process your paycheck . we would n't have had a single revolution on this planet or started putting an end to outright slavery without people like this . snowden 's a real american hero , oohrah !

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "i", "do", "n't", "think", "you", "answered", "my", "question", "either", "schmuck", ".", "there", "'s", "a", "real", "problem", ",", "there", "'s", "real", "crimes", "being", "perpetrated", "by", "our", "own", "agencies", ",", "and", "then", "there", "'s", "the", "messenger", "who", "is", "being", "loyal", "to", "his", "people", ",", "not", "the", "people", "who", "process", "his", "paycheck", ".", "i", "do", "n't", "care", "if", "the", "messenger", "broke", "the", "slaver", "'s", "law", ".", "explain", "to", "me", "why", "anyone", "should", "?", "what", "angle", "do", "you", "have", "here", "?", "``", "what", "angle", "does", "anyone", "have", "for", "going", "after", "snowden", "ahead", "of", "the", "nsa", ",", "unless", ",", "they", "also", "process", "your", "paycheck", ".", "we", "would", "n't", "have", "had", "a", "single", "revolution", "on", "this", "planet", "or", "started", "putting", "an", "end", "to", "outright", "slavery", "without", "people", "like", "this", ".", "snowden", "'s", "a", "real", "american", "hero", ",", "oohrah", "!" ]

you do n't know shit about kanye west .

cftsiqv

politics

2,014

you do n't know shit about kanye west .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "you", "do", "n't", "know", "shit", "about", "kanye", "west", "." ]

hahaha , wow . do you generally dig in when proven utterly wrong ?

chpyo6i

politics

2,014

hahaha , wow . do you generally dig in when proven utterly wrong ?

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "hahaha", ",", "wow", ".", "do", "you", "generally", "dig", "in", "when", "proven", "utterly", "wrong", "?" ]

til there 's muslims in oklahoma ? and are n't in the closet about it ?

cksjhry

politics

2,014

til there 's @@muslims## in oklahoma ? and are n't in the closet about it ?

[ "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "til", "there", "'s", "muslims", "in", "oklahoma", "?", "and", "are", "n't", "in", "the", "closet", "about", "it", "?" ]

you are so right , him and those like him , limbaugh , hannity , are at the putrid core of what the far right has become .

cfhnxjw

politics

2,014

you are so right , him and those like him , limbaugh , hannity , are at the putrid core of what @@the far right## has become .

you are so right , him and those like him , limbaugh , hannity , are at the putrid core of what the far right has become .

you are so right , him and those like him , limbaugh , hannity , are at the putrid core of what @@the far right## has become .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "you", "are", "so", "right", ",", "him", "and", "those", "like", "him", ",", "limbaugh", ",", "hannity", ",", "are", "at", "the", "putrid", "core", "of", "what", "the", "far", "right", "has", "become", "." ]

that does n't make it not a misconception . the founders or the constitution or other founding documents being infallible is another big misconception .

ch9f1mh

politics

2,014

that does n't make it not a misconception . @@the founders## or the constitution or other founding documents being infallible is another big misconception .

that does n't make it not a misconception . the founders or the constitution or other founding documents being infallible is another big misconception .

that does n't make it not a misconception . @@the founders## or the constitution or other founding documents being infallible is another big misconception .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "that", "does", "n't", "make", "it", "not", "a", "misconception", ".", "the", "founders", "or", "the", "constitution", "or", "other", "founding", "documents", "being", "infallible", "is", "another", "big", "misconception", "." ]

his father was cuban . ted cruz had to go through the naturalization process in order to receive his american citizenship , thus he 's ineligible .

cf3joj5

politics

2,014

his father was cuban . ted cruz had to go through the naturalization process in order to receive his american citizenship , thus he 's ineligible .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "his", "father", "was", "cuban", ".", "ted", "cruz", "had", "to", "go", "through", "the", "naturalization", "process", "in", "order", "to", "receive", "his", "american", "citizenship", ",", "thus", "he", "'s", "ineligible", "." ]

vigilantism is not the way to end gunviolence .

cf8i925

politics

2,014

vigilantism is not the way to end gunviolence .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "vigilantism", "is", "not", "the", "way", "to", "end", "gunviolence", "." ]

coors field might be the only stadium that can be called a massive success story . there are a few others that were n't huge failures , but most do n't break even in a costbenefit analysis . to add another , useless anecdote chase field in phoenix was modeled after coors field and that was not at all a success . i know the economics of stadiums has been in peer reviewed journals , but i ca n't seem to dig any up . there 's plenty of fairly well researched opinion pieces , though . example . URL

cf8sed8

politics

2,014

coors field might be the only stadium that can be called a massive success story . there are a few others that were n't huge failures , but most do n't break even in a costbenefit analysis . to add another , useless anecdote chase field in phoenix was modeled after coors field and that was not at all a success . i know the economics of stadiums has been in peer reviewed journals , but i ca n't seem to dig any up . there 's plenty of fairly well researched opinion pieces , though . example . URL

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "coors", "field", "might", "be", "the", "only", "stadium", "that", "can", "be", "called", "a", "massive", "success", "story", ".", "there", "are", "a", "few", "others", "that", "were", "n't", "huge", "failures", ",", "but", "most", "do", "n't", "break", "even", "in", "a", "costbenefit", "analysis", ".", "to", "add", "another", ",", "useless", "anecdote", "chase", "field", "in", "phoenix", "was", "modeled", "after", "coors", "field", "and", "that", "was", "not", "at", "all", "a", "success", ".", "i", "know", "the", "economics", "of", "stadiums", "has", "been", "in", "peer", "reviewed", "journals", ",", "but", "i", "ca", "n't", "seem", "to", "dig", "any", "up", ".", "there", "'s", "plenty", "of", "fairly", "well", "researched", "opinion", "pieces", ",", "though", ".", "example", ".", "URL" ]

because that 's the new republican strategy now . any sort of criticism lobbied against them must be met with some sort of false dichotomy .

cfzvcny

politics

2,014

because that 's the new republican strategy now . any sort of criticism lobbied against them must be met with some sort of false dichotomy .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "because", "that", "'s", "the", "new", "republican", "strategy", "now", ".", "any", "sort", "of", "criticism", "lobbied", "against", "them", "must", "be", "met", "with", "some", "sort", "of", "false", "dichotomy", "." ]

well ya , why would manufacturers do what they did in the past when it is legal to own semis ? what ?

chwyvkk

politics

2,014

well ya , why would manufacturers do what they did in the past when it is legal to own semis ? what ?

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "well", "ya", ",", "why", "would", "manufacturers", "do", "what", "they", "did", "in", "the", "past", "when", "it", "is", "legal", "to", "own", "semis", "?", "what", "?" ]

they react emotionally to the news reports popping up every single day of police abusing citizens and abusing the law . it happens consistently , as reported by many news agencies . you may single out the few that act as if the police as a whole are a terror upon our country , but most people are n't arguing that . they are reacting to an extremely large amount of events that have happened nation wide , of illegal actions taken by police , reported all the time , and then expressing disgust because the proper course of law is not applied . edit i need to leave , so if you have a retort , make sure you keep up with the logic , and be sure to mention you 're an engineer to gain some extra authority in the matter .

cgzu5qx

politics

2,014

they react emotionally to the news reports popping up every single day of @@police## abusing citizens and abusing the law . it happens consistently , as reported by many news agencies . you may single out the few that act as if the @@police## as a whole are a terror upon our country , but most people are n't arguing that . they are reacting to an extremely large amount of events that have happened nation wide , of illegal actions taken by @@police## , reported all the time , and then expressing disgust because the proper course of law is not applied . edit i need to leave , so if you have a retort , make sure you keep up with the logic , and be sure to mention you 're an engineer to gain some extra authority in the matter .

they react emotionally to the news reports popping up every single day of @@police## abusing citizens and abusing the law . it happens consistently , as reported by many @@news agencies## . you may single out the few that act as if the @@police## as a whole are a terror upon our country , but most people are n't arguing that . they are reacting to an extremely large amount of events that have happened nation wide , of illegal actions taken by @@police## , reported all the time , and then expressing disgust because the proper course of law is not applied . edit i need to leave , so if you have a retort , make sure you keep up with the logic , and be sure to mention you 're an engineer to gain some extra authority in the matter .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "they", "react", "emotionally", "to", "the", "news", "reports", "popping", "up", "every", "single", "day", "of", "police", "abusing", "citizens", "and", "abusing", "the", "law", ".", "it", "happens", "consistently", ",", "as", "reported", "by", "many", "news", "agencies", ".", "you", "may", "single", "out", "the", "few", "that", "act", "as", "if", "the", "police", "as", "a", "whole", "are", "a", "terror", "upon", "our", "country", ",", "but", "most", "people", "are", "n't", "arguing", "that", ".", "they", "are", "reacting", "to", "an", "extremely", "large", "amount", "of", "events", "that", "have", "happened", "nation", "wide", ",", "of", "illegal", "actions", "taken", "by", "police", ",", "reported", "all", "the", "time", ",", "and", "then", "expressing", "disgust", "because", "the", "proper", "course", "of", "law", "is", "not", "applied", ".", "edit", "i", "need", "to", "leave", ",", "so", "if", "you", "have", "a", "retort", ",", "make", "sure", "you", "keep", "up", "with", "the", "logic", ",", "and", "be", "sure", "to", "mention", "you", "'re", "an", "engineer", "to", "gain", "some", "extra", "authority", "in", "the", "matter", "." ]

nevermind that many people on the lower rungs already work 23 jobs , no , what they need are more jobs ! ... yet in the unemployment benefit debate there 's apparently 100 applicants for every job and nobody can get one even if they wanted ... which of these is true ? that the lower rung is working 23 jobs or that they ca n't get jobs ? yes i 'm aware they 're not completely mutually exclusive , but we 're clearly talking about a majority here

cfmid4w

politics

2,014

nevermind that many @@people on the lower rungs## already work 23 jobs , no , what they need are more jobs ! ... yet in the unemployment benefit debate there 's apparently 100 applicants for every job and nobody can get one even if they wanted ... which of these is true ? that the lower rung is working 23 jobs or that they ca n't get jobs ? yes i 'm aware they 're not completely mutually exclusive , but we 're clearly talking about a majority here

nevermind that many people on the lower rungs already work 23 jobs , no , what they need are more jobs ! ... yet in the unemployment benefit debate there 's apparently 100 applicants for every job and nobody can get one even if they wanted ... which of these is true ? that the lower rung is working 23 jobs or that they ca n't get jobs ? yes i 'm aware they 're not completely mutually exclusive , but we 're clearly talking about a majority here

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "nevermind", "that", "many", "people", "on", "the", "lower", "rungs", "already", "work", "23", "jobs", ",", "no", ",", "what", "they", "need", "are", "more", "jobs", "!", "...", "yet", "in", "the", "unemployment", "benefit", "debate", "there", "'s", "apparently", "100", "applicants", "for", "every", "job", "and", "nobody", "can", "get", "one", "even", "if", "they", "wanted", "...", "which", "of", "these", "is", "true", "?", "that", "the", "lower", "rung", "is", "working", "23", "jobs", "or", "that", "they", "ca", "n't", "get", "jobs", "?", "yes", "i", "'m", "aware", "they", "'re", "not", "completely", "mutually", "exclusive", ",", "but", "we", "'re", "clearly", "talking", "about", "a", "majority", "here" ]

the only people who like obamacare are getting subsidies for it . with the united states 18 trillion dollars in debt ... you do realize this wo n't last

cmz9kmf

politics

2,014

the only people who like obamacare are getting subsidies for it . with the united states 18 trillion dollars in debt ... you do realize this wo n't last

the only people who like obamacare are getting subsidies for it . with @@the united states## 18 trillion dollars in debt ... you do realize this wo n't last

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "the", "only", "people", "who", "like", "obamacare", "are", "getting", "subsidies", "for", "it", ".", "with", "the", "united", "states", "18", "trillion", "dollars", "in", "debt", "...", "you", "do", "realize", "this", "wo", "n't", "last" ]

the point i was bringing up was systemic differences in treatment , something born out by black americans getting far longer sentences for the same crimes . shortsightedness , ignorance , and inappropriate use of statistics are the root cause of this claim . a criminal justice system that favors the wealthy , and a correlation of african americans and income inequality , are the culprit . that does n't have shit to do with people resisting arrest and forcing police officers hands , by the way .

cn2wj1v

politics

2,014

the point i was bringing up was systemic differences in treatment , something born out by @@black americans## getting far longer sentences for the same crimes . shortsightedness , ignorance , and inappropriate use of statistics are the root cause of this claim . a criminal justice system that favors @@the wealthy## , and a correlation of @@african americans## and income inequality , are the culprit . that does n't have shit to do with people resisting arrest and forcing @@police officers## hands , by the way .

the point i was bringing up was systemic differences in treatment , something born out by @@black americans## getting far longer sentences for the same crimes . shortsightedness , ignorance , and inappropriate use of statistics are the root cause of this claim . a criminal justice system that favors the wealthy , and a correlation of @@african americans## and income inequality , are the culprit . that does n't have shit to do with @@people resisting arrest## and forcing @@police officers## hands , by the way .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "the", "point", "i", "was", "bringing", "up", "was", "systemic", "differences", "in", "treatment", ",", "something", "born", "out", "by", "black", "americans", "getting", "far", "longer", "sentences", "for", "the", "same", "crimes", ".", "shortsightedness", ",", "ignorance", ",", "and", "inappropriate", "use", "of", "statistics", "are", "the", "root", "cause", "of", "this", "claim", ".", "a", "criminal", "justice", "system", "that", "favors", "the", "wealthy", ",", "and", "a", "correlation", "of", "african", "americans", "and", "income", "inequality", ",", "are", "the", "culprit", ".", "that", "does", "n't", "have", "shit", "to", "do", "with", "people", "resisting", "arrest", "and", "forcing", "police", "officers", "hands", ",", "by", "the", "way", "." ]

are you like 15 ? your idealistic dreams of how things work seem a bit off

chduasz

politics

2,014

are you like 15 ? your idealistic dreams of how things work seem a bit off

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "are", "you", "like", "15", "?", "your", "idealistic", "dreams", "of", "how", "things", "work", "seem", "a", "bit", "off" ]

pennsylvania has never been a key state . republicans have n't come close to winning pennsylvania since 1988. of those states , north carolina is the most key because it 's the only one that changed in 2012. black turnout was n't historic for obama . it 's been over 85 for every democrat from dukakis to obama , possibly even over 90. hispanic turnout was much higher for obama than gore and it is only rising . democrats win florida with the hispanic voting and that 's all they need . democrats have several more paths to victory than republicans .

clte5vk

politics

2,014

pennsylvania has never been a key state . @@republicans## have n't come close to winning pennsylvania since 1988. of those states , north carolina is the most key because it 's the only one that changed in 2012. black turnout was n't historic for obama . it 's been over 85 for every democrat from dukakis to obama , possibly even over 90. hispanic turnout was much higher for obama than gore and it is only rising . @@democrats## win florida with the hispanic voting and that 's all they need . @@democrats## have several more paths to victory than @@republicans## .

@@pennsylvania## has never been a key state . @@republicans## have n't come close to winning @@pennsylvania## since 1988. of those states , @@north carolina## is the most key because it 's the only one that changed in 2012. black turnout was n't historic for obama . it 's been over 85 for every democrat from dukakis to obama , possibly even over 90. hispanic turnout was much higher for obama than gore and it is only rising . @@democrats## win florida with the hispanic voting and that 's all they need . @@democrats## have several more paths to victory than @@republicans## .

pennsylvania has never been a key state . @@republicans## have n't come close to winning pennsylvania since 1988. of those states , north carolina is the most key because it 's the only one that changed in 2012. black turnout was n't historic for obama . it 's been over 85 for every democrat from dukakis to obama , possibly even over 90. hispanic turnout was much higher for obama than gore and it is only rising . @@democrats## win florida with the hispanic voting and that 's all they need . @@democrats## have several more paths to victory than @@republicans## .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0 ]

[ "pennsylvania", "has", "never", "been", "a", "key", "state", ".", "republicans", "have", "n't", "come", "close", "to", "winning", "pennsylvania", "since", "1988.", "of", "those", "states", ",", "north", "carolina", "is", "the", "most", "key", "because", "it", "'s", "the", "only", "one", "that", "changed", "in", "2012.", "black", "turnout", "was", "n't", "historic", "for", "obama", ".", "it", "'s", "been", "over", "85", "for", "every", "democrat", "from", "dukakis", "to", "obama", ",", "possibly", "even", "over", "90.", "hispanic", "turnout", "was", "much", "higher", "for", "obama", "than", "gore", "and", "it", "is", "only", "rising", ".", "democrats", "win", "florida", "with", "the", "hispanic", "voting", "and", "that", "'s", "all", "they", "need", ".", "democrats", "have", "several", "more", "paths", "to", "victory", "than", "republicans", "." ]

money is powerful , but not compared to political will . once it 's legalized in enough states it will reach a tipping point where all the funding in the world wo n't stop it . once it 's seen as common sense the lobbyists lose all power .

cirip1x

politics

2,014

money is powerful , but not compared to political will . once it 's legalized in enough states it will reach a tipping point where all the funding in the world wo n't stop it . once it 's seen as common sense the @@lobbyists## lose all power .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "money", "is", "powerful", ",", "but", "not", "compared", "to", "political", "will", ".", "once", "it", "'s", "legalized", "in", "enough", "states", "it", "will", "reach", "a", "tipping", "point", "where", "all", "the", "funding", "in", "the", "world", "wo", "n't", "stop", "it", ".", "once", "it", "'s", "seen", "as", "common", "sense", "the", "lobbyists", "lose", "all", "power", "." ]

not the way you describe it . but i see no possible explanation for the iraq war other than private corporations driving wars '' . let 's go over it ? the us government has had a history of freetrade promotion leading to democracies eventually . '' the iraq war could have been revenge for bush 's father . the iraq war could have been an easy target , to send a message to wouldbe dictators that the us is the superpower . they chose iraq because they 've invaded it before and it 's an easy target . the iraq war could have been for freeing up trade in the area . the iraq war could have been establishing another democracy at the doorstep of iran . another strategic base to put pressure on iran . the iraq war could have been incompetent analysis of data . where svr was able to trick western analysts into thinking that saddam and aq were working together . the iraq war could have been about a planned attempt to modernize the middle east and to remove dictatorships and other unfriendly governments from the area . there 's tons of plausible theories that do n't involve corporations . various rich people richer shareholders in big oil , halliburton , et al . , except the fact that the oil fields are now owned by shell and china . so ... it does n't make much sense . even though there was zero evidence that saddam hussein had anything to do with osama bin laden specifically or alqaeda generally yes you are right . but how do you know there was n't a mistake . or how do you know that maybe saddam did work with aq but then stopped completely leading to trails of clues but not enough for anyone to argue publicly that there is a clear link . i remember the day of 911 . on that day , people came up to me and said i bet you it 's saddam . saddam has attacked us . '' this made me wonder . i never even thought of saddam at that moment . but why did so many americans believe saddam had something to do with it . probably because saddam and the us fought before recently , and this may have something to do with it . but it 's pretty clear he had no connection to 911 . so if you think the iraq war or , for that matter , the vietnam war was n't primarily driven by greed , or was n't part of eisenhower 's warning , then i 'd like to hear why you think that . it was n't at all related or driven by greed . iraq war , an argument could be made about it , but there 's no solid evidence . i will often see the same content , word for word , on my local newspaper , on national newspapers , on local news channels , on cable news channels , and online because a lot of sources uses the ap as the official news agency . but some of it is sheer laziness . so you already figured it out . then why are you making complicated conspiracy theories ? that you can explain by incompetence and laziness ? sometimes it 's not sinister plots sometimes it 's just stupidity or laziness . hey have to give the appearance of fairness between both sides of an issue '' you identified another problem . but that 's the problem with journalism , not americans . europeans do the same shit . i cut my teeth on watergate and wondered if all reporters were like woodward and bernstein . sadly , that 's certainly not the case now if it ever was hell , lately , i do n't think woodward and bernstein are like woodward and bernstein were . or maybe you are just more skewed into a radical spectrum than how woodward and bernstein were '' at the time . that just about every political decision on a national level , many or most decisions on a state level , and a startlingly large number of decisions at a countymunicipal level , are made on the basis of greed . but how do you know ? there can be many correlations made between successURL and actions in the past . you ca n't always call them causation '' and imply there was greed motivation involved . sometimes even greedy people do the right thing based on ideology . sometimes ideologues do the wrong thing based on greed . in some cases , even if it was all about greed . what 's the harm ? then someone who has more money should come and fix the situation . plenty of good minded individuals like bill gates or warren buffett exist . why do n't they take advantage like the koch brothers and sheldon adelson ? and if they do n't take advantage out of principle , then maybe they deserve to lose for not being superior in the game of politics . is the same answer deep throat '' gave to woodward and bernstein follow the money . '' sometimes it 's not all about the money . koch brothers are rich , but they do n't do all they do just because of money . they are politically motivated . they have beliefs . beliefs are what motivates everything in the world .

cgj8yyl

politics

2,014

not the way you describe it . but i see no possible explanation for the iraq war other than private corporations driving wars '' . let 's go over it ? the @@us government## has had a history of freetrade promotion leading to democracies eventually . '' the iraq war could have been revenge for bush 's father . the iraq war could have been an easy target , to send a message to @@wouldbe dictators## that the us is the superpower . they chose iraq because they 've invaded it before and it 's an easy target . the iraq war could have been for freeing up trade in the area . the iraq war could have been establishing another democracy at the doorstep of iran . another strategic base to put pressure on @@iran## . the iraq war could have been incompetent analysis of data . where svr was able to trick @@western analysts## into thinking that saddam and @@aq## were working together . the iraq war could have been about a planned attempt to modernize the middle east and to remove dictatorships and other unfriendly governments from the area . there 's tons of plausible theories that do n't involve corporations . various @@rich people## @@richer shareholders in big oil## , halliburton , et al . , except the fact that the oil fields are now owned by shell and china . so ... it does n't make much sense . even though there was zero evidence that saddam hussein had anything to do with osama bin laden specifically or @@alqaeda## generally yes you are right . but how do you know there was n't a mistake . or how do you know that maybe saddam did work with @@aq## but then stopped completely leading to trails of clues but not enough for anyone to argue publicly that there is a clear link . i remember the day of 911 . on that day , people came up to me and said i bet you it 's saddam . saddam has attacked us . '' this made me wonder . i never even thought of saddam at that moment . but why did so many @@americans## believe saddam had something to do with it . probably because saddam and @@the us## fought before recently , and this may have something to do with it . but it 's pretty clear he had no connection to 911 . so if you think the iraq war or , for that matter , the vietnam war was n't primarily driven by greed , or was n't part of eisenhower 's warning , then i 'd like to hear why you think that . it was n't at all related or driven by greed . iraq war , an argument could be made about it , but there 's no solid evidence . i will often see the same content , word for word , on my local newspaper , on national newspapers , on local news channels , on cable news channels , and online because a lot of sources uses the ap as the official news agency . but some of it is sheer laziness . so you already figured it out . then why are you making complicated conspiracy theories ? that you can explain by incompetence and laziness ? sometimes it 's not sinister plots sometimes it 's just stupidity or laziness . hey have to give the appearance of fairness between both sides of an issue '' you identified another problem . but that 's the problem with journalism , not @@americans## . @@europeans## do the same shit . i cut my teeth on watergate and wondered if all @@reporters## were like woodward and bernstein . sadly , that 's certainly not the case now if it ever was hell , lately , i do n't think woodward and bernstein are like woodward and bernstein were . or maybe you are just more skewed into a radical spectrum than how woodward and bernstein were '' at the time . that just about every political decision on a national level , many or most decisions on a state level , and a startlingly large number of decisions at a countymunicipal level , are made on the basis of greed . but how do you know ? there can be many correlations made between successURL and actions in the past . you ca n't always call them causation '' and imply there was greed motivation involved . sometimes even greedy people do the right thing based on ideology . sometimes ideologues do the wrong thing based on greed . in some cases , even if it was all about greed . what 's the harm ? then someone who has more money should come and fix the situation . plenty of good minded individuals like bill gates or warren buffett exist . why do n't they take advantage like the koch brothers and sheldon adelson ? and if they do n't take advantage out of principle , then maybe they deserve to lose for not being superior in the game of politics . is the same answer deep throat '' gave to woodward and bernstein follow the money . '' sometimes it 's not all about the money . koch brothers are rich , but they do n't do all they do just because of money . they are politically motivated . they have beliefs . beliefs are what motivates everything in the world .

not the way you describe it . but i see no possible explanation for the iraq war other than @@private corporations## driving wars '' . let 's go over it ? @@the us government## has had a history of freetrade promotion leading to democracies eventually . '' the iraq war could have been revenge for bush 's father . the iraq war could have been an easy target , to send a message to @@wouldbe dictators## that @@the us## is the superpower . they chose @@iraq## because they 've invaded it before and it 's an easy target . the iraq war could have been for freeing up trade in the area . the iraq war could have been establishing another democracy at the doorstep of iran . another strategic base to put pressure on @@iran## . the iraq war could have been incompetent analysis of data . where @@svr## was able to trick @@western analysts## into thinking that saddam and @@aq## were working together . the iraq war could have been about a planned attempt to modernize @@the middle east## and to remove dictatorships and other @@unfriendly governments## from the area . there 's tons of plausible theories that do n't involve corporations . various @@rich people## @@richer shareholders in big oil## , @@halliburton## , et al . , except the fact that the oil fields are now owned by @@shell## and @@china## . so ... it does n't make much sense . even though there was zero evidence that saddam hussein had anything to do with osama bin laden specifically or @@alqaeda## generally yes you are right . but how do you know there was n't a mistake . or how do you know that maybe saddam did work with @@aq## but then stopped completely leading to trails of clues but not enough for anyone to argue publicly that there is a clear link . i remember the day of 911 . on that day , people came up to me and said i bet you it 's saddam . saddam has attacked us . '' this made me wonder . i never even thought of saddam at that moment . but why did so many @@americans## believe saddam had something to do with it . probably because saddam and @@the us## fought before recently , and this may have something to do with it . but it 's pretty clear he had no connection to 911 . so if you think the iraq war or , for that matter , the vietnam war was n't primarily driven by greed , or was n't part of eisenhower 's warning , then i 'd like to hear why you think that . it was n't at all related or driven by greed . iraq war , an argument could be made about it , but there 's no solid evidence . i will often see the same content , word for word , on my local newspaper , on national newspapers , on local news channels , on cable news channels , and online because a lot of sources uses the @@ap## as the official news agency . but some of it is sheer laziness . so you already figured it out . then why are you making complicated conspiracy theories ? that you can explain by incompetence and laziness ? sometimes it 's not sinister plots sometimes it 's just stupidity or laziness . hey have to give the appearance of fairness between both sides of an issue '' you identified another problem . but that 's the problem with journalism , not @@americans## . @@europeans## do the same shit . i cut my teeth on watergate and wondered if all @@reporters## were like woodward and bernstein . sadly , that 's certainly not the case now if it ever was hell , lately , i do n't think woodward and bernstein are like woodward and bernstein were . or maybe you are just more skewed into a radical spectrum than how woodward and bernstein were '' at the time . that just about every political decision on a national level , many or most decisions on a state level , and a startlingly large number of decisions at a countymunicipal level , are made on the basis of greed . but how do you know ? there can be many correlations made between successURL and actions in the past . you ca n't always call them causation '' and imply there was greed motivation involved . sometimes even @@greedy people## do the right thing based on ideology . sometimes ideologues do the wrong thing based on greed . in some cases , even if it was all about greed . what 's the harm ? then someone who has more money should come and fix the situation . plenty of @@good minded individuals## like bill gates or warren buffett exist . why do n't they take advantage like the @@koch brothers## and sheldon adelson ? and if they do n't take advantage out of principle , then maybe they deserve to lose for not being superior in the game of politics . is the same answer deep throat '' gave to woodward and bernstein follow the money . '' sometimes it 's not all about the money . @@koch brothers## are rich , but they do n't do all they do just because of money . they are politically motivated . they have beliefs . beliefs are what motivates everything in the world .

not the way you describe it . but i see no possible explanation for the iraq war other than private corporations driving wars '' . let 's go over it ? @@the us government## has had a history of freetrade promotion leading to democracies eventually . '' the iraq war could have been revenge for bush 's father . the iraq war could have been an easy target , to send a message to @@wouldbe dictators## that @@the us## is the superpower . they chose @@iraq## because they 've invaded it before and it 's an easy target . the iraq war could have been for freeing up trade in the area . the iraq war could have been establishing another democracy at the doorstep of iran . another strategic base to put pressure on @@iran## . the iraq war could have been incompetent analysis of data . where @@svr## was able to trick @@western analysts## into thinking that saddam and @@aq## were working together . the iraq war could have been about a planned attempt to modernize @@the middle east## and to remove dictatorships and other @@unfriendly governments## from the area . there 's tons of plausible theories that do n't involve corporations . various @@rich people## @@richer shareholders in big oil## , @@halliburton## , et al . , except the fact that the oil fields are now owned by @@shell## and @@china## . so ... it does n't make much sense . even though there was zero evidence that saddam hussein had anything to do with osama bin laden specifically or @@alqaeda## generally yes you are right . but how do you know there was n't a mistake . or how do you know that maybe saddam did work with @@aq## but then stopped completely leading to trails of clues but not enough for anyone to argue publicly that there is a clear link . i remember the day of 911 . on that day , people came up to me and said i bet you it 's saddam . saddam has attacked us . '' this made me wonder . i never even thought of saddam at that moment . but why did so many @@americans## believe saddam had something to do with it . probably because saddam and @@the us## fought before recently , and this may have something to do with it . but it 's pretty clear he had no connection to 911 . so if you think the iraq war or , for that matter , the vietnam war was n't primarily driven by greed , or was n't part of eisenhower 's warning , then i 'd like to hear why you think that . it was n't at all related or driven by greed . iraq war , an argument could be made about it , but there 's no solid evidence . i will often see the same content , word for word , on my local newspaper , on national newspapers , on local news channels , on cable news channels , and online because a lot of sources uses the @@ap## as the official news agency . but some of it is sheer laziness . so you already figured it out . then why are you making complicated conspiracy theories ? that you can explain by incompetence and laziness ? sometimes it 's not sinister plots sometimes it 's just stupidity or laziness . hey have to give the appearance of fairness between both sides of an issue '' you identified another problem . but that 's the problem with journalism , not @@americans## . @@europeans## do the same shit . i cut my teeth on watergate and wondered if all @@reporters## were like woodward and bernstein . sadly , that 's certainly not the case now if it ever was hell , lately , i do n't think woodward and bernstein are like woodward and bernstein were . or maybe you are just more skewed into a radical spectrum than how woodward and bernstein were '' at the time . that just about every political decision on a national level , many or most decisions on a state level , and a startlingly large number of decisions at a countymunicipal level , are made on the basis of greed . but how do you know ? there can be many correlations made between successURL and actions in the past . you ca n't always call them causation '' and imply there was greed motivation involved . sometimes even @@greedy people## do the right thing based on ideology . sometimes ideologues do the wrong thing based on greed . in some cases , even if it was all about greed . what 's the harm ? then someone who has more money should come and fix the situation . plenty of @@good minded individuals## like bill gates or warren buffett exist . why do n't they take advantage like the @@koch brothers## and sheldon adelson ? and if they do n't take advantage out of principle , then maybe they deserve to lose for not being superior in the game of politics . is the same answer deep throat '' gave to woodward and bernstein follow the money . '' sometimes it 's not all about the money . @@koch brothers## are rich , but they do n't do all they do just because of money . they are politically motivated . they have beliefs . beliefs are what motivates everything in the world .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "B", "I", "I", "I", "I", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "not", "the", "way", "you", "describe", "it", ".", "but", "i", "see", "no", "possible", "explanation", "for", "the", "iraq", "war", "other", "than", "private", "corporations", "driving", "wars", "``", ".", "let", "'s", "go", "over", "it", "?", "the", "us", "government", "has", "had", "a", "history", "of", "freetrade", "promotion", "leading", "to", "democracies", "eventually", ".", "``", "the", "iraq", "war", "could", "have", "been", "revenge", "for", "bush", "'s", "father", ".", "the", "iraq", "war", "could", "have", "been", "an", "easy", "target", ",", "to", "send", "a", "message", "to", "wouldbe", "dictators", "that", "the", "us", "is", "the", "superpower", ".", "they", "chose", "iraq", "because", "they", "'ve", "invaded", "it", "before", "and", "it", "'s", "an", "easy", "target", ".", "the", "iraq", "war", "could", "have", "been", "for", "freeing", "up", "trade", "in", "the", "area", ".", "the", "iraq", "war", "could", "have", "been", "establishing", "another", "democracy", "at", "the", "doorstep", "of", "iran", ".", "another", "strategic", "base", "to", "put", "pressure", "on", "iran", ".", "the", "iraq", "war", "could", "have", "been", "incompetent", "analysis", "of", "data", ".", "where", "svr", "was", "able", "to", "trick", "western", "analysts", "into", "thinking", "that", "saddam", "and", "aq", "were", "working", "together", ".", "the", "iraq", "war", "could", "have", "been", "about", "a", "planned", "attempt", "to", "modernize", "the", "middle", "east", "and", "to", "remove", "dictatorships", "and", "other", "unfriendly", "governments", "from", "the", "area", ".", "there", "'s", "tons", "of", "plausible", "theories", "that", "do", "n't", "involve", "corporations", ".", "various", "rich", "people", "richer", "shareholders", "in", "big", "oil", ",", "halliburton", ",", "et", "al", ".", ",", "except", "the", "fact", "that", "the", "oil", "fields", "are", "now", "owned", "by", "shell", "and", "china", ".", "so", "...", "it", "does", "n't", "make", "much", "sense", ".", "even", "though", "there", "was", "zero", "evidence", "that", "saddam", "hussein", "had", "anything", "to", "do", "with", "osama", "bin", "laden", "specifically", "or", "alqaeda", "generally", "yes", "you", "are", "right", ".", "but", "how", "do", "you", "know", "there", "was", "n't", "a", "mistake", ".", "or", "how", "do", "you", "know", "that", "maybe", "saddam", "did", "work", "with", "aq", "but", "then", "stopped", "completely", "leading", "to", "trails", "of", "clues", "but", "not", "enough", "for", "anyone", "to", "argue", "publicly", "that", "there", "is", "a", "clear", "link", ".", "i", "remember", "the", "day", "of", "911", ".", "on", "that", "day", ",", "people", "came", "up", "to", "me", "and", "said", "i", "bet", "you", "it", "'s", "saddam", ".", "saddam", "has", "attacked", "us", ".", "``", "this", "made", "me", "wonder", ".", "i", "never", "even", "thought", "of", "saddam", "at", "that", "moment", ".", "but", "why", "did", "so", "many", "americans", "believe", "saddam", "had", "something", "to", "do", "with", "it", ".", "probably", "because", "saddam", "and", "the", "us", "fought", "before", "recently", ",", "and", "this", "may", "have", "something", "to", "do", "with", "it", ".", "but", "it", "'s", "pretty", "clear", "he", "had", "no", "connection", "to", "911", ".", "so", "if", "you", "think", "the", "iraq", "war", "or", ",", "for", "that", "matter", ",", "the", "vietnam", "war", "was", "n't", "primarily", "driven", "by", "greed", ",", "or", "was", "n't", "part", "of", "eisenhower", "'s", "warning", ",", "then", "i", "'d", "like", "to", "hear", "why", "you", "think", "that", ".", "it", "was", "n't", "at", "all", "related", "or", "driven", "by", "greed", ".", "iraq", "war", ",", "an", "argument", "could", "be", "made", "about", "it", ",", "but", "there", "'s", "no", "solid", "evidence", ".", "i", "will", "often", "see", "the", "same", "content", ",", "word", "for", "word", ",", "on", "my", "local", "newspaper", ",", "on", "national", "newspapers", ",", "on", "local", "news", "channels", ",", "on", "cable", "news", "channels", ",", "and", "online", "because", "a", "lot", "of", "sources", "uses", "the", "ap", "as", "the", "official", "news", "agency", ".", "but", "some", "of", "it", "is", "sheer", "laziness", ".", "so", "you", "already", "figured", "it", "out", ".", "then", "why", "are", "you", "making", "complicated", "conspiracy", "theories", "?", "that", "you", "can", "explain", "by", "incompetence", "and", "laziness", "?", "sometimes", "it", "'s", "not", "sinister", "plots", "sometimes", "it", "'s", "just", "stupidity", "or", "laziness", ".", "hey", "have", "to", "give", "the", "appearance", "of", "fairness", "between", "both", "sides", "of", "an", "issue", "``", "you", "identified", "another", "problem", ".", "but", "that", "'s", "the", "problem", "with", "journalism", ",", "not", "americans", ".", "europeans", "do", "the", "same", "shit", ".", "i", "cut", "my", "teeth", "on", "watergate", "and", "wondered", "if", "all", "reporters", "were", "like", "woodward", "and", "bernstein", ".", "sadly", ",", "that", "'s", "certainly", "not", "the", "case", "now", "if", "it", "ever", "was", "hell", ",", "lately", ",", "i", "do", "n't", "think", "woodward", "and", "bernstein", "are", "like", "woodward", "and", "bernstein", "were", ".", "or", "maybe", "you", "are", "just", "more", "skewed", "into", "a", "radical", "spectrum", "than", "how", "woodward", "and", "bernstein", "were", "``", "at", "the", "time", ".", "that", "just", "about", "every", "political", "decision", "on", "a", "national", "level", ",", "many", "or", "most", "decisions", "on", "a", "state", "level", ",", "and", "a", "startlingly", "large", "number", "of", "decisions", "at", "a", "countymunicipal", "level", ",", "are", "made", "on", "the", "basis", "of", "greed", ".", "but", "how", "do", "you", "know", "?", "there", "can", "be", "many", "correlations", "made", "between", "successURL", "and", "actions", "in", "the", "past", ".", "you", "ca", "n't", "always", "call", "them", "causation", "``", "and", "imply", "there", "was", "greed", "motivation", "involved", ".", "sometimes", "even", "greedy", "people", "do", "the", "right", "thing", "based", "on", "ideology", ".", "sometimes", "ideologues", "do", "the", "wrong", "thing", "based", "on", "greed", ".", "in", "some", "cases", ",", "even", "if", "it", "was", "all", "about", "greed", ".", "what", "'s", "the", "harm", "?", "then", "someone", "who", "has", "more", "money", "should", "come", "and", "fix", "the", "situation", ".", "plenty", "of", "good", "minded", "individuals", "like", "bill", "gates", "or", "warren", "buffett", "exist", ".", "why", "do", "n't", "they", "take", "advantage", "like", "the", "koch", "brothers", "and", "sheldon", "adelson", "?", "and", "if", "they", "do", "n't", "take", "advantage", "out", "of", "principle", ",", "then", "maybe", "they", "deserve", "to", "lose", "for", "not", "being", "superior", "in", "the", "game", "of", "politics", ".", "is", "the", "same", "answer", "deep", "throat", "``", "gave", "to", "woodward", "and", "bernstein", "follow", "the", "money", ".", "``", "sometimes", "it", "'s", "not", "all", "about", "the", "money", ".", "koch", "brothers", "are", "rich", ",", "but", "they", "do", "n't", "do", "all", "they", "do", "just", "because", "of", "money", ".", "they", "are", "politically", "motivated", ".", "they", "have", "beliefs", ".", "beliefs", "are", "what", "motivates", "everything", "in", "the", "world", "." ]

until recently i was the qa director for a small educational software shop and i think i have an answer for that because we do n't know . i 've listed jobs and had 12 viable candidates in a week and hired within 2. other times i 've had to ease through dozens of prequalified resumes , done dozens of phone interviews and ended up settling for someone who wasnt great because of project need ... it hurt more to have an empty role and be burning my own time than it did to get someone on board who was not a great fit . so how long a job will run depends on who applies and how fast .

ci2ggh5

politics

2,014

until recently i was the qa director for a small educational software shop and i think i have an answer for that because we do n't know . i 've listed jobs and had 12 viable candidates in a week and hired within 2. other times i 've had to ease through dozens of prequalified resumes , done dozens of phone interviews and ended up settling for someone who wasnt great because of project need ... it hurt more to have an empty role and be burning my own time than it did to get someone on board who was not a great fit . so how long a job will run depends on who applies and how fast .

until recently i was the qa director for a small educational software shop and i think i have an answer for that because we do n't know . i 've listed jobs and had 12 @@viable candidates## in a week and hired within 2. other times i 've had to ease through dozens of prequalified resumes , done dozens of phone interviews and ended up settling for someone who wasnt great because of project need ... it hurt more to have an empty role and be burning my own time than it did to get someone on board who was not a great fit . so how long a job will run depends on who applies and how fast .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "until", "recently", "i", "was", "the", "qa", "director", "for", "a", "small", "educational", "software", "shop", "and", "i", "think", "i", "have", "an", "answer", "for", "that", "because", "we", "do", "n't", "know", ".", "i", "'ve", "listed", "jobs", "and", "had", "12", "viable", "candidates", "in", "a", "week", "and", "hired", "within", "2.", "other", "times", "i", "'ve", "had", "to", "ease", "through", "dozens", "of", "prequalified", "resumes", ",", "done", "dozens", "of", "phone", "interviews", "and", "ended", "up", "settling", "for", "someone", "who", "wasnt", "great", "because", "of", "project", "need", "...", "it", "hurt", "more", "to", "have", "an", "empty", "role", "and", "be", "burning", "my", "own", "time", "than", "it", "did", "to", "get", "someone", "on", "board", "who", "was", "not", "a", "great", "fit", ".", "so", "how", "long", "a", "job", "will", "run", "depends", "on", "who", "applies", "and", "how", "fast", "." ]

self employed means he goes under the table sir ? ! are you suggesting that all self employed entrepreneurs are tax cheats ? are you some sort of communists ? better dead than red i always say .

cm8v0nw

politics

2,014

self employed means he goes under the table sir ? ! are you suggesting that all @@self employed entrepreneurs## are tax cheats ? are you some sort of @@communists## ? better dead than red i always say .

self employed means he goes under the table sir ? ! are you suggesting that all @@self employed entrepreneurs## are tax cheats ? are you some sort of communists ? better dead than red i always say .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "self", "employed", "means", "he", "goes", "under", "the", "table", "sir", "?", "!", "are", "you", "suggesting", "that", "all", "self", "employed", "entrepreneurs", "are", "tax", "cheats", "?", "are", "you", "some", "sort", "of", "communists", "?", "better", "dead", "than", "red", "i", "always", "say", "." ]

i proposed to get money out of politics . you said why bother , let 's go libertarian . now i explained you why getting money out of politics is better than libertarianism . and now you tell me that we have an issue because we have money in politics ? really ? you really did n't . you explained that it can be done . i never really refuted that . i asked why its better to use a state that always reverts back to protecting the oligarchy once you stop looking which people do every time , because they are under the false impression that they can . this entire paragraph is exactly why libertarianism is total bs . it 's the naive idea that collective willpower somehow overcomes the laws of economy that have established over millenia . that somehow , a hivemind will form that will reject morally bad companies even if they make the cheaper offer . you could not say a more ironic thing as someone who supports the use of a compulsory state . any change you want to effect through government happens on a cultural level first . otherwise your push for change flops . government did n't abolish slavery before there was enough of a cultural push to achieve it . women were n't just willy nilly up and granted the right to vote until culture built up enough steam to support it . you are taking a very shallow look at human action , and then calling it ineffective . you are saying a libertarian society wo n't work because people wo n't do the work . ironically , that is exactly why our state is being used against us by the oligarchy . if what you are saying is true , then the state fails on the same grouds that you claim a libertarian society would fail . not even fucking reddit manages to abstain from companies they hate , such as ea or walmart or exxon or bp or boa . try to convince a guy on a minimum wage job to buy great local products instead of skimming cheapskate supermarket chain special offers , do n't even mind when your ideal system got rid of minimum wage and he works for , literally , nothing but board and lodge . are you forgetting the state has been used by these companies extensively ? are you forgetting that the state is being used to prevent us from having viable options ?

cgtb5my

politics

2,014

i proposed to get money out of politics . you said why bother , let 's go libertarian . now i explained you why getting money out of politics is better than libertarianism . and now you tell me that we have an issue because we have money in politics ? really ? you really did n't . you explained that it can be done . i never really refuted that . i asked why its better to use a state that always reverts back to protecting the oligarchy once you stop looking which people do every time , because they are under the false impression that they can . this entire paragraph is exactly why libertarianism is total bs . it 's the naive idea that collective willpower somehow overcomes the laws of economy that have established over millenia . that somehow , a hivemind will form that will reject morally bad companies even if they make the cheaper offer . you could not say a more ironic thing as someone who supports the use of a compulsory state . any change you want to effect through government happens on a cultural level first . otherwise your push for change flops . government did n't abolish slavery before there was enough of a cultural push to achieve it . @@women## were n't just willy nilly up and granted the right to vote until culture built up enough steam to support it . you are taking a very shallow look at human action , and then calling it ineffective . you are saying a libertarian society wo n't work because people wo n't do the work . ironically , that is exactly why our state is being used against us by the oligarchy . if what you are saying is true , then the state fails on the same grouds that you claim a libertarian society would fail . not even fucking @@reddit## manages to abstain from companies they hate , such as ea or walmart or exxon or bp or boa . try to convince a guy on a minimum wage job to buy great local products instead of skimming cheapskate supermarket chain special offers , do n't even mind when your ideal system got rid of minimum wage and he works for , literally , nothing but board and lodge . are you forgetting the state has been used by these companies extensively ? are you forgetting that the state is being used to prevent us from having viable options ?

i proposed to get money out of politics . you said why bother , let 's go libertarian . now i explained you why getting money out of politics is better than libertarianism . and now you tell me that we have an issue because we have money in politics ? really ? you really did n't . you explained that it can be done . i never really refuted that . i asked why its better to use a state that always reverts back to protecting the oligarchy once you stop looking which people do every time , because they are under the false impression that they can . this entire paragraph is exactly why libertarianism is total bs . it 's the naive idea that collective willpower somehow overcomes the laws of economy that have established over millenia . that somehow , a hivemind will form that will reject morally @@bad companies## even if they make the cheaper offer . you could not say a more ironic thing as someone who supports the use of a compulsory state . any change you want to effect through government happens on a cultural level first . otherwise your push for change flops . government did n't abolish slavery before there was enough of a cultural push to achieve it . @@women## were n't just willy nilly up and granted the right to vote until culture built up enough steam to support it . you are taking a very shallow look at human action , and then calling it ineffective . you are saying a libertarian society wo n't work because people wo n't do the work . ironically , that is exactly why our state is being used against us by the oligarchy . if what you are saying is true , then the state fails on the same grouds that you claim a libertarian society would fail . not even fucking @@reddit## manages to abstain from companies they hate , such as @@ea## or @@walmart## or @@exxon## or @@bp## or @@boa## . try to convince a guy on a minimum wage job to buy great local products instead of skimming cheapskate supermarket chain special offers , do n't even mind when your ideal system got rid of minimum wage and he works for , literally , nothing but board and lodge . are you forgetting the state has been used by these companies extensively ? are you forgetting that the state is being used to prevent us from having viable options ?

i proposed to get money out of politics . you said why bother , let 's go libertarian . now i explained you why getting money out of politics is better than libertarianism . and now you tell me that we have an issue because we have money in politics ? really ? you really did n't . you explained that it can be done . i never really refuted that . i asked why its better to use a state that always reverts back to protecting the oligarchy once you stop looking which people do every time , because they are under the false impression that they can . this entire paragraph is exactly why libertarianism is total bs . it 's the naive idea that collective willpower somehow overcomes the laws of economy that have established over millenia . that somehow , a hivemind will form that will reject morally bad companies even if they make the cheaper offer . you could not say a more ironic thing as someone who supports the use of a compulsory state . any change you want to effect through government happens on a cultural level first . otherwise your push for change flops . government did n't abolish slavery before there was enough of a cultural push to achieve it . @@women## were n't just willy nilly up and granted the right to vote until culture built up enough steam to support it . you are taking a very shallow look at human action , and then calling it ineffective . you are saying a libertarian society wo n't work because people wo n't do the work . ironically , that is exactly why our state is being used against us by the oligarchy . if what you are saying is true , then the state fails on the same grouds that you claim a libertarian society would fail . not even fucking @@reddit## manages to abstain from companies they hate , such as @@ea## or @@walmart## or @@exxon## or @@bp## or @@boa## . try to convince a guy on a minimum wage job to buy great local products instead of skimming cheapskate supermarket chain special offers , do n't even mind when your ideal system got rid of minimum wage and he works for , literally , nothing but board and lodge . are you forgetting the state has been used by these companies extensively ? are you forgetting that the state is being used to prevent us from having viable options ?

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "B", "O", "B", "O", "B", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 2, 0, 2, 0, 2, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "i", "proposed", "to", "get", "money", "out", "of", "politics", ".", "you", "said", "why", "bother", ",", "let", "'s", "go", "libertarian", ".", "now", "i", "explained", "you", "why", "getting", "money", "out", "of", "politics", "is", "better", "than", "libertarianism", ".", "and", "now", "you", "tell", "me", "that", "we", "have", "an", "issue", "because", "we", "have", "money", "in", "politics", "?", "really", "?", "you", "really", "did", "n't", ".", "you", "explained", "that", "it", "can", "be", "done", ".", "i", "never", "really", "refuted", "that", ".", "i", "asked", "why", "its", "better", "to", "use", "a", "state", "that", "always", "reverts", "back", "to", "protecting", "the", "oligarchy", "once", "you", "stop", "looking", "which", "people", "do", "every", "time", ",", "because", "they", "are", "under", "the", "false", "impression", "that", "they", "can", ".", "this", "entire", "paragraph", "is", "exactly", "why", "libertarianism", "is", "total", "bs", ".", "it", "'s", "the", "naive", "idea", "that", "collective", "willpower", "somehow", "overcomes", "the", "laws", "of", "economy", "that", "have", "established", "over", "millenia", ".", "that", "somehow", ",", "a", "hivemind", "will", "form", "that", "will", "reject", "morally", "bad", "companies", "even", "if", "they", "make", "the", "cheaper", "offer", ".", "you", "could", "not", "say", "a", "more", "ironic", "thing", "as", "someone", "who", "supports", "the", "use", "of", "a", "compulsory", "state", ".", "any", "change", "you", "want", "to", "effect", "through", "government", "happens", "on", "a", "cultural", "level", "first", ".", "otherwise", "your", "push", "for", "change", "flops", ".", "government", "did", "n't", "abolish", "slavery", "before", "there", "was", "enough", "of", "a", "cultural", "push", "to", "achieve", "it", ".", "women", "were", "n't", "just", "willy", "nilly", "up", "and", "granted", "the", "right", "to", "vote", "until", "culture", "built", "up", "enough", "steam", "to", "support", "it", ".", "you", "are", "taking", "a", "very", "shallow", "look", "at", "human", "action", ",", "and", "then", "calling", "it", "ineffective", ".", "you", "are", "saying", "a", "libertarian", "society", "wo", "n't", "work", "because", "people", "wo", "n't", "do", "the", "work", ".", "ironically", ",", "that", "is", "exactly", "why", "our", "state", "is", "being", "used", "against", "us", "by", "the", "oligarchy", ".", "if", "what", "you", "are", "saying", "is", "true", ",", "then", "the", "state", "fails", "on", "the", "same", "grouds", "that", "you", "claim", "a", "libertarian", "society", "would", "fail", ".", "not", "even", "fucking", "reddit", "manages", "to", "abstain", "from", "companies", "they", "hate", ",", "such", "as", "ea", "or", "walmart", "or", "exxon", "or", "bp", "or", "boa", ".", "try", "to", "convince", "a", "guy", "on", "a", "minimum", "wage", "job", "to", "buy", "great", "local", "products", "instead", "of", "skimming", "cheapskate", "supermarket", "chain", "special", "offers", ",", "do", "n't", "even", "mind", "when", "your", "ideal", "system", "got", "rid", "of", "minimum", "wage", "and", "he", "works", "for", ",", "literally", ",", "nothing", "but", "board", "and", "lodge", ".", "are", "you", "forgetting", "the", "state", "has", "been", "used", "by", "these", "companies", "extensively", "?", "are", "you", "forgetting", "that", "the", "state", "is", "being", "used", "to", "prevent", "us", "from", "having", "viable", "options", "?" ]

i took it as casting a vote and feeling like you were struggling against the tides of stupidity . i 'm not saying he should n't keep trying , but it seems like inhofe and coburn are locked in there . it sounds like coburn wo n't serve his full term ... but even so , i would n't be surprised if the next ok republican in line was a lock for his seat .

cg7pn2b

politics

2,014

i took it as casting a vote and feeling like you were struggling against the tides of stupidity . i 'm not saying he should n't keep trying , but it seems like inhofe and coburn are locked in there . it sounds like coburn wo n't serve his full term ... but even so , i would n't be surprised if the next ok republican in line was a lock for his seat .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "i", "took", "it", "as", "casting", "a", "vote", "and", "feeling", "like", "you", "were", "struggling", "against", "the", "tides", "of", "stupidity", ".", "i", "'m", "not", "saying", "he", "should", "n't", "keep", "trying", ",", "but", "it", "seems", "like", "inhofe", "and", "coburn", "are", "locked", "in", "there", ".", "it", "sounds", "like", "coburn", "wo", "n't", "serve", "his", "full", "term", "...", "but", "even", "so", ",", "i", "would", "n't", "be", "surprised", "if", "the", "next", "ok", "republican", "in", "line", "was", "a", "lock", "for", "his", "seat", "." ]

yes , the house passed the disclose act , when democrats were in the majority in 2010 217 support vs. 36 against , and even though there was almost unanimous republican opposition 2 support vs. 170 against . and then the republican minority pulled a filibuster URL in the senate and had enough votes to prevent cloture so it never got an up or down vote . if if had not been filibustered by republicans , it had enough support from democrats that it would have easily passed . how 's that for context ?

cljxuwn

politics

2,014

yes , @@the house## passed the disclose act , when @@democrats## were in the majority in 2010 217 support vs. 36 against , and even though there was almost unanimous republican opposition 2 support vs. 170 against . and then the @@republican minority## pulled a filibuster URL in @@the senate## and had enough votes to prevent cloture so it never got an up or down vote . if if had not been filibustered by @@republicans## , it had enough support from @@democrats## that it would have easily passed . how 's that for context ?

yes , the house passed the disclose act , when @@democrats## were in the majority in 2010 217 support vs. 36 against , and even though there was almost @@unanimous republican opposition## 2 support vs. 170 against . and then the @@republican minority## pulled a filibuster URL in @@the senate## and had enough votes to prevent cloture so it never got an up or down vote . if if had not been filibustered by @@republicans## , it had enough support from @@democrats## that it would have easily passed . how 's that for context ?

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "yes", ",", "the", "house", "passed", "the", "disclose", "act", ",", "when", "democrats", "were", "in", "the", "majority", "in", "2010", "217", "support", "vs.", "36", "against", ",", "and", "even", "though", "there", "was", "almost", "unanimous", "republican", "opposition", "2", "support", "vs.", "170", "against", ".", "and", "then", "the", "republican", "minority", "pulled", "a", "filibuster", "URL", "in", "the", "senate", "and", "had", "enough", "votes", "to", "prevent", "cloture", "so", "it", "never", "got", "an", "up", "or", "down", "vote", ".", "if", "if", "had", "not", "been", "filibustered", "by", "republicans", ",", "it", "had", "enough", "support", "from", "democrats", "that", "it", "would", "have", "easily", "passed", ".", "how", "'s", "that", "for", "context", "?" ]

you can have a policy of not doing something and still do it on occasion . for instance , every return policy in the world . doing fact checking '' of statements like this just demonstrates that the process is a joke , something this subreddit fully embraced when politifact happened to say something bad about obama last year URL . the fact that administrations have said for decades that we do n't negotiate with terrorists demonstrates that we have a policy of not negotiating with terrorists . examples of such negotiations just show frequent departures from the policy . whether this is another departure or a change in policy is n't something susceptible to neutral fact checking .

chwxmil

politics

2,014

you can have a policy of not doing something and still do it on occasion . for instance , every return policy in the world . doing fact checking '' of statements like this just demonstrates that the process is a joke , something this subreddit fully embraced when politifact happened to say something bad about obama last year URL . the fact that administrations have said for decades that we do n't negotiate with @@terrorists## demonstrates that we have a policy of not negotiating with @@terrorists## . examples of such negotiations just show frequent departures from the policy . whether this is another departure or a change in policy is n't something susceptible to neutral fact checking .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "you", "can", "have", "a", "policy", "of", "not", "doing", "something", "and", "still", "do", "it", "on", "occasion", ".", "for", "instance", ",", "every", "return", "policy", "in", "the", "world", ".", "doing", "fact", "checking", "``", "of", "statements", "like", "this", "just", "demonstrates", "that", "the", "process", "is", "a", "joke", ",", "something", "this", "subreddit", "fully", "embraced", "when", "politifact", "happened", "to", "say", "something", "bad", "about", "obama", "last", "year", "URL", ".", "the", "fact", "that", "administrations", "have", "said", "for", "decades", "that", "we", "do", "n't", "negotiate", "with", "terrorists", "demonstrates", "that", "we", "have", "a", "policy", "of", "not", "negotiating", "with", "terrorists", ".", "examples", "of", "such", "negotiations", "just", "show", "frequent", "departures", "from", "the", "policy", ".", "whether", "this", "is", "another", "departure", "or", "a", "change", "in", "policy", "is", "n't", "something", "susceptible", "to", "neutral", "fact", "checking", "." ]

he should get used to this type of reception .

cf4p05j

politics

2,014

he should get used to this type of reception .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "he", "should", "get", "used", "to", "this", "type", "of", "reception", "." ]

she 's lost her seat . she knows it . she can squeal all she wants . she 's toast

clynqk5

politics

2,014

she 's lost her seat . she knows it . she can squeal all she wants . she 's toast

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "she", "'s", "lost", "her", "seat", ".", "she", "knows", "it", ".", "she", "can", "squeal", "all", "she", "wants", ".", "she", "'s", "toast" ]

now i know why a starbucks on pine st in seattle has just one employee and an automated machine that makes the drinks .

ch7izy9

politics

2,014

now i know why a starbucks on pine st in seattle has just one employee and an automated machine that makes the drinks .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "now", "i", "know", "why", "a", "starbucks", "on", "pine", "st", "in", "seattle", "has", "just", "one", "employee", "and", "an", "automated", "machine", "that", "makes", "the", "drinks", "." ]

fair enough , but what was mexico 's response to the sandy hook shootings ?

cm3qs3j

politics

2,014

fair enough , but what was @@mexico## 's response to the sandy hook shootings ?

fair enough , but what was @@mexico 's## response to the sandy hook shootings ?

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "fair", "enough", ",", "but", "what", "was", "mexico", "'s", "response", "to", "the", "sandy", "hook", "shootings", "?" ]

all the deficits are much bigger than when he took office . nearly doubling the deficit each year for the first three years and then lowering it from the high , only in government land is considering shrinking the deficit .

cgu1okr

politics

2,014

all the deficits are much bigger than when he took office . nearly doubling the deficit each year for the first three years and then lowering it from the high , only in government land is considering shrinking the deficit .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "all", "the", "deficits", "are", "much", "bigger", "than", "when", "he", "took", "office", ".", "nearly", "doubling", "the", "deficit", "each", "year", "for", "the", "first", "three", "years", "and", "then", "lowering", "it", "from", "the", "high", ",", "only", "in", "government", "land", "is", "considering", "shrinking", "the", "deficit", "." ]

fringe candidate ? that 's your opinion . he 's taking up a majority of posts because his message actually resonates with people unlike the same old hoopla u.s. voters are sick and tired of hearing .

csqkjpb

politics

2,015

fringe candidate ? that 's your opinion . he 's taking up a majority of posts because his message actually resonates with people unlike the same old hoopla @@u.s. voters## are sick and tired of hearing .

fringe candidate ? that 's your opinion . he 's taking up a majority of posts because his message actually resonates with people unlike the same @@old hoopla u.s. voters## are sick and tired of hearing .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "fringe", "candidate", "?", "that", "'s", "your", "opinion", ".", "he", "'s", "taking", "up", "a", "majority", "of", "posts", "because", "his", "message", "actually", "resonates", "with", "people", "unlike", "the", "same", "old", "hoopla", "u.s.", "voters", "are", "sick", "and", "tired", "of", "hearing", "." ]

because that 's based on disproved pseudoscientific bullshit made up specifically to limit abortion access and pander to prolife voters . URL

cy07n1x

politics

2,015

because that 's based on disproved pseudoscientific bullshit made up specifically to limit abortion access and pander to prolife voters . URL

because that 's based on disproved pseudoscientific bullshit made up specifically to limit abortion access and pander to @@prolife voters## . URL

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0 ]

[ "because", "that", "'s", "based", "on", "disproved", "pseudoscientific", "bullshit", "made", "up", "specifically", "to", "limit", "abortion", "access", "and", "pander", "to", "prolife", "voters", ".", "URL" ]

i did n't read to far but campaigning to drop state education bureaucracy and allowing federal to do the job does n't seem very conservative .

cnkdnwu

politics

2,015

i did n't read to far but campaigning to drop state education bureaucracy and allowing federal to do the job does n't seem very conservative .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "i", "did", "n't", "read", "to", "far", "but", "campaigning", "to", "drop", "state", "education", "bureaucracy", "and", "allowing", "federal", "to", "do", "the", "job", "does", "n't", "seem", "very", "conservative", "." ]

i can agree with this . this is why i support a voucher system as opposed to public schooling and why i support nit instead of minimum wage .

crsdx71

politics

2,015

i can agree with this . this is why i support a voucher system as opposed to public schooling and why i support nit instead of minimum wage .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "i", "can", "agree", "with", "this", ".", "this", "is", "why", "i", "support", "a", "voucher", "system", "as", "opposed", "to", "public", "schooling", "and", "why", "i", "support", "nit", "instead", "of", "minimum", "wage", "." ]

if you think the modern right will ever look at any plan proposed by a democratic president and say , you 've got a point , '' you 're living in a dream world .

ct1w8za

politics

2,015

if you think the modern right will ever look at any plan proposed by a democratic president and say , you 've got a point , '' you 're living in a dream world .

if you think @@the modern right## will ever look at any plan proposed by a democratic president and say , you 've got a point , '' you 're living in a dream world .

[ "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "if", "you", "think", "the", "modern", "right", "will", "ever", "look", "at", "any", "plan", "proposed", "by", "a", "democratic", "president", "and", "say", ",", "you", "'ve", "got", "a", "point", ",", "``", "you", "'re", "living", "in", "a", "dream", "world", "." ]

what is even the point of campaign spending limits if you can just void them by spending a ridiculous amount ? that seems like the exact thing they 're supposed to prevent .

cxgruft

politics

2,015

what is even the point of campaign spending limits if you can just void them by spending a ridiculous amount ? that seems like the exact thing they 're supposed to prevent .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "what", "is", "even", "the", "point", "of", "campaign", "spending", "limits", "if", "you", "can", "just", "void", "them", "by", "spending", "a", "ridiculous", "amount", "?", "that", "seems", "like", "the", "exact", "thing", "they", "'re", "supposed", "to", "prevent", "." ]

knife owners too . baseball bat owners also tire irons . all hand tools . arms , legs , the head head butt liability . most any and everything out there needs liability insurance . edit come to think of it , liability insurance is a right . everyone should have government paid for liability insurance . even the illegal aliens living here need liability insurance .

crp7bmj

politics

2,015

knife owners too . baseball bat owners also tire irons . all hand tools . arms , legs , the head head butt liability . most any and everything out there needs liability insurance . edit come to think of it , liability insurance is a right . everyone should have government paid for liability insurance . even the @@illegal aliens## living here need liability insurance .

@@knife owners## too . @@baseball bat owners## also tire irons . all hand tools . arms , legs , the head head butt liability . most any and everything out there needs liability insurance . edit come to think of it , liability insurance is a right . everyone should have government paid for liability insurance . even the @@illegal aliens## living here need liability insurance .

[ "B", "I", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 2, 1, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "knife", "owners", "too", ".", "baseball", "bat", "owners", "also", "tire", "irons", ".", "all", "hand", "tools", ".", "arms", ",", "legs", ",", "the", "head", "head", "butt", "liability", ".", "most", "any", "and", "everything", "out", "there", "needs", "liability", "insurance", ".", "edit", "come", "to", "think", "of", "it", ",", "liability", "insurance", "is", "a", "right", ".", "everyone", "should", "have", "government", "paid", "for", "liability", "insurance", ".", "even", "the", "illegal", "aliens", "living", "here", "need", "liability", "insurance", "." ]

there you go ignoring everything i say and just repeating again . look , that is not how pro life people see the argument . for them , the choice is not important , it the right to life that the fetus has . that 's well and good , but that 's their rationale , not their position . like it or not , their position on the question should one have the choice to legally abort a pregnancy , '' which is the point of disagreement , is no . '' it does n't matter why they feel that way . as i 've said before , rationale and feelings do n't enter into the equation . this is not about why they hold a position . this is about the fact that they hold a position . this it not about feelings . unless you disagree that their answer is no '' to the question do you think one should have the choice to legally abort a pregnancy '' then you agree with me here . because that is my argument . that they would answer no '' to that question . i do n't care about why they answer no , '' just like i do n't care why a prochoicer would answer yes . '' because it 's irrelevant to this discussion . which makes it astounding to me that you somehow think i 'm treating antichoicers unfairly because i 'm holding their position to the same exact standards to which i 'm holding the other side . the only way you can possibly disprove my argument is to argue that they prolifers would answer yes . '' calling them anti choice is framing their argument in a negative light . again , political framing is incompatible with objectivity , so unless you think that they would answer yes '' to that question , again , it is not politically framing their argument . it is an objective representation of their position , which as i 've said about 50 million times , is what i 'm talking about . not their fucking argument . note how many times i 've clarified this . it 's probably upwards of 20 or 30 by now . i 'm not talking about their argument , reason , rationale , or pointofview , because that is not relevant to the question of what their position is , and this entire thing , from the very beginning when i first responded was about position , and only position .

cvazkjf

politics

2,015

there you go ignoring everything i say and just repeating again . look , that is not how @@pro life people## see the argument . for them , the choice is not important , it the right to life that the fetus has . that 's well and good , but that 's their rationale , not their position . like it or not , their position on the question should one have the choice to legally abort a pregnancy , '' which is the point of disagreement , is no . '' it does n't matter why they feel that way . as i 've said before , rationale and feelings do n't enter into the equation . this is not about why they hold a position . this is about the fact that they hold a position . this it not about feelings . unless you disagree that their answer is no '' to the question do you think one should have the choice to legally abort a pregnancy '' then you agree with me here . because that is my argument . that they would answer no '' to that question . i do n't care about why they answer no , '' just like i do n't care why a prochoicer would answer yes . '' because it 's irrelevant to this discussion . which makes it astounding to me that you somehow think i 'm treating @@antichoicers## unfairly because i 'm holding their position to the same exact standards to which i 'm holding the other side . the only way you can possibly disprove my argument is to argue that they @@prolifers## would answer yes . '' calling them anti choice is framing their argument in a negative light . again , political framing is incompatible with objectivity , so unless you think that they would answer yes '' to that question , again , it is not politically framing their argument . it is an objective representation of their position , which as i 've said about 50 million times , is what i 'm talking about . not their fucking argument . note how many times i 've clarified this . it 's probably upwards of 20 or 30 by now . i 'm not talking about their argument , reason , rationale , or pointofview , because that is not relevant to the question of what their position is , and this entire thing , from the very beginning when i first responded was about position , and only position .

there you go ignoring everything i say and just repeating again . look , that is not how @@pro life people## see the argument . for them , the choice is not important , it the right to life that the fetus has . that 's well and good , but that 's their rationale , not their position . like it or not , their position on the question should one have the choice to legally abort a pregnancy , '' which is the point of disagreement , is no . '' it does n't matter why they feel that way . as i 've said before , rationale and feelings do n't enter into the equation . this is not about why they hold a position . this is about the fact that they hold a position . this it not about feelings . unless you disagree that their answer is no '' to the question do you think one should have the choice to legally abort a pregnancy '' then you agree with me here . because that is my argument . that they would answer no '' to that question . i do n't care about why they answer no , '' just like i do n't care why a prochoicer would answer yes . '' because it 's irrelevant to this discussion . which makes it astounding to me that you somehow think i 'm treating @@antichoicers## unfairly because i 'm holding their position to the same exact standards to which i 'm holding the other side . the only way you can possibly disprove my argument is to argue that they prolifers would answer yes . '' calling them anti choice is framing their argument in a negative light . again , political framing is incompatible with objectivity , so unless you think that they would answer yes '' to that question , again , it is not politically framing their argument . it is an objective representation of their position , which as i 've said about 50 million times , is what i 'm talking about . not their fucking argument . note how many times i 've clarified this . it 's probably upwards of 20 or 30 by now . i 'm not talking about their argument , reason , rationale , or pointofview , because that is not relevant to the question of what their position is , and this entire thing , from the very beginning when i first responded was about position , and only position .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "there", "you", "go", "ignoring", "everything", "i", "say", "and", "just", "repeating", "again", ".", "look", ",", "that", "is", "not", "how", "pro", "life", "people", "see", "the", "argument", ".", "for", "them", ",", "the", "choice", "is", "not", "important", ",", "it", "the", "right", "to", "life", "that", "the", "fetus", "has", ".", "that", "'s", "well", "and", "good", ",", "but", "that", "'s", "their", "rationale", ",", "not", "their", "position", ".", "like", "it", "or", "not", ",", "their", "position", "on", "the", "question", "should", "one", "have", "the", "choice", "to", "legally", "abort", "a", "pregnancy", ",", "``", "which", "is", "the", "point", "of", "disagreement", ",", "is", "no", ".", "``", "it", "does", "n't", "matter", "why", "they", "feel", "that", "way", ".", "as", "i", "'ve", "said", "before", ",", "rationale", "and", "feelings", "do", "n't", "enter", "into", "the", "equation", ".", "this", "is", "not", "about", "why", "they", "hold", "a", "position", ".", "this", "is", "about", "the", "fact", "that", "they", "hold", "a", "position", ".", "this", "it", "not", "about", "feelings", ".", "unless", "you", "disagree", "that", "their", "answer", "is", "no", "``", "to", "the", "question", "do", "you", "think", "one", "should", "have", "the", "choice", "to", "legally", "abort", "a", "pregnancy", "``", "then", "you", "agree", "with", "me", "here", ".", "because", "that", "is", "my", "argument", ".", "that", "they", "would", "answer", "no", "``", "to", "that", "question", ".", "i", "do", "n't", "care", "about", "why", "they", "answer", "no", ",", "``", "just", "like", "i", "do", "n't", "care", "why", "a", "prochoicer", "would", "answer", "yes", ".", "``", "because", "it", "'s", "irrelevant", "to", "this", "discussion", ".", "which", "makes", "it", "astounding", "to", "me", "that", "you", "somehow", "think", "i", "'m", "treating", "antichoicers", "unfairly", "because", "i", "'m", "holding", "their", "position", "to", "the", "same", "exact", "standards", "to", "which", "i", "'m", "holding", "the", "other", "side", ".", "the", "only", "way", "you", "can", "possibly", "disprove", "my", "argument", "is", "to", "argue", "that", "they", "prolifers", "would", "answer", "yes", ".", "``", "calling", "them", "anti", "choice", "is", "framing", "their", "argument", "in", "a", "negative", "light", ".", "again", ",", "political", "framing", "is", "incompatible", "with", "objectivity", ",", "so", "unless", "you", "think", "that", "they", "would", "answer", "yes", "``", "to", "that", "question", ",", "again", ",", "it", "is", "not", "politically", "framing", "their", "argument", ".", "it", "is", "an", "objective", "representation", "of", "their", "position", ",", "which", "as", "i", "'ve", "said", "about", "50", "million", "times", ",", "is", "what", "i", "'m", "talking", "about", ".", "not", "their", "fucking", "argument", ".", "note", "how", "many", "times", "i", "'ve", "clarified", "this", ".", "it", "'s", "probably", "upwards", "of", "20", "or", "30", "by", "now", ".", "i", "'m", "not", "talking", "about", "their", "argument", ",", "reason", ",", "rationale", ",", "or", "pointofview", ",", "because", "that", "is", "not", "relevant", "to", "the", "question", "of", "what", "their", "position", "is", ",", "and", "this", "entire", "thing", ",", "from", "the", "very", "beginning", "when", "i", "first", "responded", "was", "about", "position", ",", "and", "only", "position", "." ]

of course that only leaves the duds ...

cpiiio2

politics

2,015

of course that only leaves the duds ...

of course that only leaves @@the duds## ...

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0 ]

[ "of", "course", "that", "only", "leaves", "the", "duds", "..." ]

i called bush out on it but i 'm fine with obama doing it because obama is my guy . so proud to have voted for him , and so proud he is my president ! herobama firstevar

cxoncil

politics

2,015

i called bush out on it but i 'm fine with obama doing it because obama is my guy . so proud to have voted for him , and so proud he is my president ! herobama firstevar

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "i", "called", "bush", "out", "on", "it", "but", "i", "'m", "fine", "with", "obama", "doing", "it", "because", "obama", "is", "my", "guy", ".", "so", "proud", "to", "have", "voted", "for", "him", ",", "and", "so", "proud", "he", "is", "my", "president", "!", "herobama", "firstevar" ]

i 'm honestly confused . where did the 5,475,000 come from ? would n't the sum of daily loans add up to 365,000 ?

ctvxn4m

politics

2,015

i 'm honestly confused . where did the 5,475,000 come from ? would n't the sum of daily loans add up to 365,000 ?

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "i", "'m", "honestly", "confused", ".", "where", "did", "the", "5,475,000", "come", "from", "?", "would", "n't", "the", "sum", "of", "daily", "loans", "add", "up", "to", "365,000", "?" ]

the topic her is the article which claims they are planning on spending nearly a billion in the next cycle alone . yeah maybe you did n't realize when commenting that my response was to someone who said or asked if the koch brothers are donating a billion dollars . can we agree that they are n't ? this is what the article has to say the kochs ' plan to spend 889 million through their network of 17 allied groups in the 2016 cycle so they are raising a projected 899 million through their network of 17 groups . if we can agree that they are n't indeed donating the money themselves then there really is nothing else to talk about .

co3xy6t

politics

2,015

the topic her is the article which claims they are planning on spending nearly a billion in the next cycle alone . yeah maybe you did n't realize when commenting that my response was to someone who said or asked if the koch brothers are donating a billion dollars . can we agree that they are n't ? this is what the article has to say the kochs ' plan to spend 889 million through their network of 17 allied groups in the 2016 cycle so they are raising a projected 899 million through their network of 17 groups . if we can agree that they are n't indeed donating the money themselves then there really is nothing else to talk about .

the topic her is the article which claims they are planning on spending nearly a billion in the next cycle alone . yeah maybe you did n't realize when commenting that my response was to someone who said or asked if the @@koch brothers## are donating a billion dollars . can we agree that they are n't ? this is what the article has to say @@the kochs## ' plan to spend 889 million through their @@network of 17 allied groups## in the 2016 cycle so they are raising a projected 899 million through their network of 17 groups . if we can agree that they are n't indeed donating the money themselves then there really is nothing else to talk about .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "the", "topic", "her", "is", "the", "article", "which", "claims", "they", "are", "planning", "on", "spending", "nearly", "a", "billion", "in", "the", "next", "cycle", "alone", ".", "yeah", "maybe", "you", "did", "n't", "realize", "when", "commenting", "that", "my", "response", "was", "to", "someone", "who", "said", "or", "asked", "if", "the", "koch", "brothers", "are", "donating", "a", "billion", "dollars", ".", "can", "we", "agree", "that", "they", "are", "n't", "?", "this", "is", "what", "the", "article", "has", "to", "say", "the", "kochs", "'", "plan", "to", "spend", "889", "million", "through", "their", "network", "of", "17", "allied", "groups", "in", "the", "2016", "cycle", "so", "they", "are", "raising", "a", "projected", "899", "million", "through", "their", "network", "of", "17", "groups", ".", "if", "we", "can", "agree", "that", "they", "are", "n't", "indeed", "donating", "the", "money", "themselves", "then", "there", "really", "is", "nothing", "else", "to", "talk", "about", "." ]

why are foreign policy discussions always about war ? why ca n't we talk about all the money we 're giving to the pakistanis ?

cvywpey

politics

2,015

why are foreign policy discussions always about war ? why ca n't we talk about all the money we 're giving to the @@pakistanis## ?

why are foreign policy discussions always about war ? why ca n't we talk about all the money we 're giving to the pakistanis ?

why are foreign policy discussions always about war ? why ca n't we talk about all the money we 're giving to the @@pakistanis## ?

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0 ]

[ "why", "are", "foreign", "policy", "discussions", "always", "about", "war", "?", "why", "ca", "n't", "we", "talk", "about", "all", "the", "money", "we", "'re", "giving", "to", "the", "pakistanis", "?" ]

you 're supposed to go along with the edginess in the thread , bernie fucked up ... better blame hillary somehow .

cy4mo9o

politics

2,015

you 're supposed to go along with the edginess in the thread , bernie fucked up ... better blame hillary somehow .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "you", "'re", "supposed", "to", "go", "along", "with", "the", "edginess", "in", "the", "thread", ",", "bernie", "fucked", "up", "...", "better", "blame", "hillary", "somehow", "." ]

it takes true words from the newspaper and turns them around backwards and stretches and distorts them till they 're crazy ... omg , silly putty is ben carson !

cw8u3fl

politics

2,015

it takes true words from the newspaper and turns them around backwards and stretches and distorts them till they 're crazy ... omg , silly putty is ben carson !

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "it", "takes", "true", "words", "from", "the", "newspaper", "and", "turns", "them", "around", "backwards", "and", "stretches", "and", "distorts", "them", "till", "they", "'re", "crazy", "...", "omg", ",", "silly", "putty", "is", "ben", "carson", "!" ]

that 's not relevant my focus was on the second sentence of the quote the first was only there to help contextualize it . my point was about how the taxes and fees are only possible , not certain . in fact , it 'd be a ridiculous presumption to assume that all or even most of them would be implemented , as it makes a lot of weird assumptions , such as internet service getting state and local 911 fees added onto it . it 's entirely plausible that the net cost increase will be 0 . senator lee 's statement is one that promises that a there will be increase , and b they will be massive . the first is , at best , a bold prediction . the second just has no grounding in a logical assessment of the situation .

couvcsw

politics

2,015

that 's not relevant my focus was on the second sentence of the quote the first was only there to help contextualize it . my point was about how the taxes and fees are only possible , not certain . in fact , it 'd be a ridiculous presumption to assume that all or even most of them would be implemented , as it makes a lot of weird assumptions , such as internet service getting state and local 911 fees added onto it . it 's entirely plausible that the net cost increase will be 0 . senator lee 's statement is one that promises that a there will be increase , and b they will be massive . the first is , at best , a bold prediction . the second just has no grounding in a logical assessment of the situation .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "that", "'s", "not", "relevant", "my", "focus", "was", "on", "the", "second", "sentence", "of", "the", "quote", "the", "first", "was", "only", "there", "to", "help", "contextualize", "it", ".", "my", "point", "was", "about", "how", "the", "taxes", "and", "fees", "are", "only", "possible", ",", "not", "certain", ".", "in", "fact", ",", "it", "'d", "be", "a", "ridiculous", "presumption", "to", "assume", "that", "all", "or", "even", "most", "of", "them", "would", "be", "implemented", ",", "as", "it", "makes", "a", "lot", "of", "weird", "assumptions", ",", "such", "as", "internet", "service", "getting", "state", "and", "local", "911", "fees", "added", "onto", "it", ".", "it", "'s", "entirely", "plausible", "that", "the", "net", "cost", "increase", "will", "be", "0", ".", "senator", "lee", "'s", "statement", "is", "one", "that", "promises", "that", "a", "there", "will", "be", "increase", ",", "and", "b", "they", "will", "be", "massive", ".", "the", "first", "is", ",", "at", "best", ",", "a", "bold", "prediction", ".", "the", "second", "just", "has", "no", "grounding", "in", "a", "logical", "assessment", "of", "the", "situation", "." ]

so therefore a lame article about kids takes its place ? this is a step backwards

cnvayzq

politics

2,015

so therefore a lame article about @@kids## takes its place ? this is a step backwards

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "so", "therefore", "a", "lame", "article", "about", "kids", "takes", "its", "place", "?", "this", "is", "a", "step", "backwards" ]

hi piede . thank you for participating in SUBREDDIT . however , your submission has been removed for the following reason already submitted this article has been submitted to SUBREDDIT within the last three days URL i 'm a bot and sometimes i make mistakes . if you have any questions about this removal , please feel free to message the moderators . URL regarding the removal of this submission by USER messagei have a question regarding the removal of this submission . URL

cxxb29s

politics

2,015

hi piede . thank you for participating in SUBREDDIT . however , your submission has been removed for the following reason already submitted this article has been submitted to SUBREDDIT within the last three days URL i 'm a bot and sometimes i make mistakes . if you have any questions about this removal , please feel free to message the moderators . URL regarding the removal of this submission by USER messagei have a question regarding the removal of this submission . URL

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "hi", "piede", ".", "thank", "you", "for", "participating", "in", "SUBREDDIT", ".", "however", ",", "your", "submission", "has", "been", "removed", "for", "the", "following", "reason", "already", "submitted", "this", "article", "has", "been", "submitted", "to", "SUBREDDIT", "within", "the", "last", "three", "days", "URL", "i", "'m", "a", "bot", "and", "sometimes", "i", "make", "mistakes", ".", "if", "you", "have", "any", "questions", "about", "this", "removal", ",", "please", "feel", "free", "to", "message", "the", "moderators", ".", "URL", "regarding", "the", "removal", "of", "this", "submission", "by", "USER", "messagei", "have", "a", "question", "regarding", "the", "removal", "of", "this", "submission", ".", "URL" ]

sure , everywhere in the world is the same as denmark .

cqw33a4

politics

2,015

sure , everywhere in the world is the same as denmark .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "sure", ",", "everywhere", "in", "the", "world", "is", "the", "same", "as", "denmark", "." ]

i 'm so sick of these polls trying to obviously influence people 's vote , will to vote , or create more apathy . ffs , just give the candidates their air time and let the people vote uninhibited .

cy0c3fy

politics

2,015

i 'm so sick of these polls trying to obviously influence people 's vote , will to vote , or create more apathy . ffs , just give the candidates their air time and let the people vote uninhibited .

i 'm so sick of these polls trying to obviously influence people 's vote , will to vote , or create more apathy . ffs , just give the @@candidates## their air time and let the people vote uninhibited .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "i", "'m", "so", "sick", "of", "these", "polls", "trying", "to", "obviously", "influence", "people", "'s", "vote", ",", "will", "to", "vote", ",", "or", "create", "more", "apathy", ".", "ffs", ",", "just", "give", "the", "candidates", "their", "air", "time", "and", "let", "the", "people", "vote", "uninhibited", "." ]

it makes me sick that she would take money from people like that .

cte52al

politics

2,015

it makes me sick that she would take money from people like that .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "it", "makes", "me", "sick", "that", "she", "would", "take", "money", "from", "people", "like", "that", "." ]

still , brandishing guns towards any federal agents , regardless of their position , is grounds for a long time in prison .

cuykhm1

politics

2,015

still , brandishing guns towards any @@federal agents## , regardless of their position , is grounds for a long time in prison .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "still", ",", "brandishing", "guns", "towards", "any", "federal", "agents", ",", "regardless", "of", "their", "position", ",", "is", "grounds", "for", "a", "long", "time", "in", "prison", "." ]

you can find a historian that will say anything for attention of money . just watch all the ivy phds on the history channel talking about proof for aliens

cxvfwvn

politics

2,015

you can find a historian that will say anything for attention of money . just watch all the ivy phds on the history channel talking about proof for aliens

you can find a historian that will say anything for attention of money . just watch all the ivy phds on the history channel talking about proof for @@aliens##

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2 ]

[ "you", "can", "find", "a", "historian", "that", "will", "say", "anything", "for", "attention", "of", "money", ".", "just", "watch", "all", "the", "ivy", "phds", "on", "the", "history", "channel", "talking", "about", "proof", "for", "aliens" ]

woo ! the he has no chance is turning into a winning campaign

cuwp5yk

politics

2,015

woo ! the he has no chance is turning into a winning campaign

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "woo", "!", "the", "he", "has", "no", "chance", "is", "turning", "into", "a", "winning", "campaign" ]

he is the ron paul of ron paul of 2016. sorta crazy but has some solid idea that both sides agree on .

cr57xqf

politics

2,015

he is the ron paul of ron paul of 2016. sorta crazy but has some solid idea that @@both sides## agree on .

he is the ron paul of ron paul of 2016. sorta crazy but has some solid idea that both sides agree on .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "he", "is", "the", "ron", "paul", "of", "ron", "paul", "of", "2016.", "sorta", "crazy", "but", "has", "some", "solid", "idea", "that", "both", "sides", "agree", "on", "." ]

so you guys arent doing anything illegal then . i just wonder if i get pulled over , have a gun in the car but i happen to have a felony in my past , will the cops be able to know that i should have a gun ?

cwtd0ok

politics

2,015

so you guys arent doing anything illegal then . i just wonder if i get pulled over , have a gun in the car but i happen to have a felony in my past , will the @@cops## be able to know that i should have a gun ?

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "so", "you", "guys", "arent", "doing", "anything", "illegal", "then", ".", "i", "just", "wonder", "if", "i", "get", "pulled", "over", ",", "have", "a", "gun", "in", "the", "car", "but", "i", "happen", "to", "have", "a", "felony", "in", "my", "past", ",", "will", "the", "cops", "be", "able", "to", "know", "that", "i", "should", "have", "a", "gun", "?" ]

becoming reluctant to being exposed contributing to the wacko global warming deniers , meaning the religious right allies of polluters who do n't want to spend the money necessary to clean up emissions . that was the beauty of alec and other 501 c entities , many set up by the koch brothers and friends , they hid the donors . hence the uproar over irs scrutiny , and republicans cutting irs funding .

cq4heey

politics

2,015

becoming reluctant to being exposed contributing to the wacko @@global warming deniers## , meaning the @@religious right allies## of @@polluters who do n't want to spend the money necessary to clean up emissions## . that was the beauty of alec and other 501 c entities , many set up by the koch brothers and friends , they hid the donors . hence the uproar over irs scrutiny , and @@republicans## cutting irs funding .

becoming reluctant to being exposed contributing to the @@wacko global warming deniers## , meaning the @@religious right allies of polluters## who do n't want to spend the money necessary to clean up emissions . that was the beauty of alec and other @@501 c entities## , many set up by the @@koch brothers## and @@friends## , they hid the @@donors## . hence the uproar over irs scrutiny , and @@republicans## cutting irs funding .

becoming reluctant to being exposed contributing to the @@wacko global warming deniers## , meaning the @@religious right allies of polluters who do n't want to spend the money necessary to clean up emissions## . that was the beauty of alec and other @@501 c entities## , many set up by the @@koch brothers## and @@friends## , they hid the @@donors## . hence the uproar over irs scrutiny , and @@republicans## cutting irs funding .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "becoming", "reluctant", "to", "being", "exposed", "contributing", "to", "the", "wacko", "global", "warming", "deniers", ",", "meaning", "the", "religious", "right", "allies", "of", "polluters", "who", "do", "n't", "want", "to", "spend", "the", "money", "necessary", "to", "clean", "up", "emissions", ".", "that", "was", "the", "beauty", "of", "alec", "and", "other", "501", "c", "entities", ",", "many", "set", "up", "by", "the", "koch", "brothers", "and", "friends", ",", "they", "hid", "the", "donors", ".", "hence", "the", "uproar", "over", "irs", "scrutiny", ",", "and", "republicans", "cutting", "irs", "funding", "." ]

the ability to not pay overtime to salaried works plays a huge role as well . much cheaper to have a few people working 5060 hours a week but only being paid for essentially 40 while you use part timers to fill in the gaps .

ct34k7t

politics

2,015

the ability to not pay overtime to salaried works plays a huge role as well . much cheaper to have a few people working 5060 hours a week but only being paid for essentially 40 while you use @@part timers## to fill in the gaps .

the ability to not pay overtime to salaried works plays a huge role as well . much cheaper to have a few @@people working 5060 hours a week## but only being paid for essentially 40 while you use @@part timers## to fill in the gaps .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "the", "ability", "to", "not", "pay", "overtime", "to", "salaried", "works", "plays", "a", "huge", "role", "as", "well", ".", "much", "cheaper", "to", "have", "a", "few", "people", "working", "5060", "hours", "a", "week", "but", "only", "being", "paid", "for", "essentially", "40", "while", "you", "use", "part", "timers", "to", "fill", "in", "the", "gaps", "." ]

what do you consider demeaning ? that is entirely subjective .

cwk5hmy

politics

2,015

what do you consider demeaning ? that is entirely subjective .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "what", "do", "you", "consider", "demeaning", "?", "that", "is", "entirely", "subjective", "." ]

hillary clinton , like every other candidate ever , is trying to win endorsements . hillary clinton , like every other candidate ever , touts her endorsements . it seems like your real problem with this is that i you do n't like hillary clinton , and ii you do n't like that hillary clinton has been so much more successful than other candidates at winning endorsements . in short , you 're suffering from sour grapes .

cuk2ens

politics

2,015

hillary clinton , like every other candidate ever , is trying to win endorsements . hillary clinton , like every other candidate ever , touts her endorsements . it seems like your real problem with this is that i you do n't like hillary clinton , and ii you do n't like that hillary clinton has been so much more successful than other candidates at winning endorsements . in short , you 're suffering from sour grapes .

hillary clinton , like every other candidate ever , is trying to win endorsements . hillary clinton , like every other candidate ever , touts her endorsements . it seems like your real problem with this is that i you do n't like hillary clinton , and ii you do n't like that hillary clinton has been so much more successful than other @@candidates## at winning endorsements . in short , you 're suffering from sour grapes .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "hillary", "clinton", ",", "like", "every", "other", "candidate", "ever", ",", "is", "trying", "to", "win", "endorsements", ".", "hillary", "clinton", ",", "like", "every", "other", "candidate", "ever", ",", "touts", "her", "endorsements", ".", "it", "seems", "like", "your", "real", "problem", "with", "this", "is", "that", "i", "you", "do", "n't", "like", "hillary", "clinton", ",", "and", "ii", "you", "do", "n't", "like", "that", "hillary", "clinton", "has", "been", "so", "much", "more", "successful", "than", "other", "candidates", "at", "winning", "endorsements", ".", "in", "short", ",", "you", "'re", "suffering", "from", "sour", "grapes", "." ]

well duh . ffs , look at america 's right reich wing .

cxwydku

politics

2,015

well duh . ffs , look at @@america 's right reich wing## .

well duh . ffs , look at @@america 's## right reich wing .

well duh . ffs , look at @@america 's right reich wing## .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "I", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0 ]

[ "well", "duh", ".", "ffs", ",", "look", "at", "america", "'s", "right", "reich", "wing", "." ]

rule zero of SUBREDDIT for the next several weeks if it 's not bernie sanders , nobody probably cares .

cqxvcq8

politics

2,015

rule zero of SUBREDDIT for the next several weeks if it 's not bernie sanders , nobody probably cares .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "rule", "zero", "of", "SUBREDDIT", "for", "the", "next", "several", "weeks", "if", "it", "'s", "not", "bernie", "sanders", ",", "nobody", "probably", "cares", "." ]

those big glasses were supposed to make him look smarter . he needs to wear those big glasses over his mouth , shutting him up is the only way to make him seem smarter .

csctk5p

politics

2,015

those big glasses were supposed to make him look smarter . he needs to wear those big glasses over his mouth , shutting him up is the only way to make him seem smarter .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "those", "big", "glasses", "were", "supposed", "to", "make", "him", "look", "smarter", ".", "he", "needs", "to", "wear", "those", "big", "glasses", "over", "his", "mouth", ",", "shutting", "him", "up", "is", "the", "only", "way", "to", "make", "him", "seem", "smarter", "." ]

everyone knows it , but one party is still pretty much completely against it . let 's not forget that in the upcoming elections .

d4yurcs

politics

2,016

everyone knows it , but one party is still pretty much completely against it . let 's not forget that in the upcoming elections .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "everyone", "knows", "it", ",", "but", "one", "party", "is", "still", "pretty", "much", "completely", "against", "it", ".", "let", "'s", "not", "forget", "that", "in", "the", "upcoming", "elections", "." ]

or goldman sachs but she ca n't mention them .

czn64pm

politics

2,016

or goldman sachs but she ca n't mention them .

or @@goldman sachs## but she ca n't mention them .

[ "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "or", "goldman", "sachs", "but", "she", "ca", "n't", "mention", "them", "." ]

bernie supporter here too . just was always realistic though that a democratic socialist was going to be a long shot . and yes this sub has entered critical circlejerk mass .

d0gels5

politics

2,016

bernie supporter here too . just was always realistic though that a democratic socialist was going to be a long shot . and yes this sub has entered critical circlejerk mass .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "bernie", "supporter", "here", "too", ".", "just", "was", "always", "realistic", "though", "that", "a", "democratic", "socialist", "was", "going", "to", "be", "a", "long", "shot", ".", "and", "yes", "this", "sub", "has", "entered", "critical", "circlejerk", "mass", "." ]

i heard the judge once posted a positive yelp review of a taco bell , therefore she is obviously biased against trump and unqualified to be a judge .

d9rlizm

politics

2,016

i heard the judge once posted a positive yelp review of a taco bell , therefore she is obviously biased against trump and unqualified to be a judge .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "i", "heard", "the", "judge", "once", "posted", "a", "positive", "yelp", "review", "of", "a", "taco", "bell", ",", "therefore", "she", "is", "obviously", "biased", "against", "trump", "and", "unqualified", "to", "be", "a", "judge", "." ]

these are two issues where one does n't cancel the other out . the ig reports from the state department state that she never asked for approval from the official channels for this server . this sets the precedent that you can get away with this as long as you claim no intent . the idea of foia was to make our government transparent to the public so we could respond to issues like a rogue server exposed to foreign powers . when the president , fbi , the public give her a free pass without even a slap on the wrist it tells us as long as you 're powerful enough the law can not touch you . again the blackberry was the small thing that led to the real issue that is the server . if you want to talk about blackberries or personal email addresses fine but talk about the issue of a secretary of state without any approval from the chain of command setting up an un secure server literally in the basement of her ny domestic home with the help of a random ass it guy while that is going on good civil servants and soldiers are jailed for lesser acts that were accidental . please , let 's talk about why this is just getting a pass from the people like it 's just no fucking big deal .

d5yw1b0

politics

2,016

these are two issues where one does n't cancel the other out . the ig reports from the @@state department## state that she never asked for approval from the official channels for this server . this sets the precedent that you can get away with this as long as you claim no intent . the idea of foia was to make our government transparent to @@the public## so we could respond to issues like a rogue server exposed to foreign powers . when the president , @@fbi## , @@the public## give her a free pass without even a slap on the wrist it tells us as long as you 're powerful enough the law can not touch you . again the blackberry was the small thing that led to the real issue that is the server . if you want to talk about blackberries or personal email addresses fine but talk about the issue of a secretary of state without any approval from @@the chain of command## setting up an un secure server literally in the basement of her ny domestic home with the help of a random ass it guy while that is going on good @@civil servants## and @@soldiers## are jailed for lesser acts that were accidental . please , let 's talk about why this is just getting a pass from the people like it 's just no fucking big deal .

these are two issues where one does n't cancel the other out . the ig reports from the state department state that she never asked for approval from the official channels for this server . this sets the precedent that you can get away with this as long as you claim no intent . the idea of foia was to make our government transparent to the public so we could respond to issues like a rogue server exposed to foreign powers . when the president , @@fbi## , the public give her a free pass without even a slap on the wrist it tells us as long as you 're powerful enough the law can not touch you . again the blackberry was the small thing that led to the real issue that is the server . if you want to talk about blackberries or personal email addresses fine but talk about the issue of a secretary of state without any approval from the chain of command setting up an un secure server literally in the basement of her ny domestic home with the help of a random ass it guy while that is going on @@good civil servants## and @@soldiers## are jailed for lesser acts that were accidental . please , let 's talk about why this is just getting a pass from the people like it 's just no fucking big deal .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "these", "are", "two", "issues", "where", "one", "does", "n't", "cancel", "the", "other", "out", ".", "the", "ig", "reports", "from", "the", "state", "department", "state", "that", "she", "never", "asked", "for", "approval", "from", "the", "official", "channels", "for", "this", "server", ".", "this", "sets", "the", "precedent", "that", "you", "can", "get", "away", "with", "this", "as", "long", "as", "you", "claim", "no", "intent", ".", "the", "idea", "of", "foia", "was", "to", "make", "our", "government", "transparent", "to", "the", "public", "so", "we", "could", "respond", "to", "issues", "like", "a", "rogue", "server", "exposed", "to", "foreign", "powers", ".", "when", "the", "president", ",", "fbi", ",", "the", "public", "give", "her", "a", "free", "pass", "without", "even", "a", "slap", "on", "the", "wrist", "it", "tells", "us", "as", "long", "as", "you", "'re", "powerful", "enough", "the", "law", "can", "not", "touch", "you", ".", "again", "the", "blackberry", "was", "the", "small", "thing", "that", "led", "to", "the", "real", "issue", "that", "is", "the", "server", ".", "if", "you", "want", "to", "talk", "about", "blackberries", "or", "personal", "email", "addresses", "fine", "but", "talk", "about", "the", "issue", "of", "a", "secretary", "of", "state", "without", "any", "approval", "from", "the", "chain", "of", "command", "setting", "up", "an", "un", "secure", "server", "literally", "in", "the", "basement", "of", "her", "ny", "domestic", "home", "with", "the", "help", "of", "a", "random", "ass", "it", "guy", "while", "that", "is", "going", "on", "good", "civil", "servants", "and", "soldiers", "are", "jailed", "for", "lesser", "acts", "that", "were", "accidental", ".", "please", ",", "let", "'s", "talk", "about", "why", "this", "is", "just", "getting", "a", "pass", "from", "the", "people", "like", "it", "'s", "just", "no", "fucking", "big", "deal", "." ]

there are plenty of instances where murder is 100 legal . then it is n't murder . murder is unlawful illegal killing .

d7vtoya

politics

2,016

there are plenty of instances where murder is 100 legal . then it is n't murder . murder is unlawful illegal killing .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "there", "are", "plenty", "of", "instances", "where", "murder", "is", "100", "legal", ".", "then", "it", "is", "n't", "murder", ".", "murder", "is", "unlawful", "illegal", "killing", "." ]

christ , he could crucify her if he 'd just put a modicum of effort into it . lazy . sad .

d4lqgms

politics

2,016

christ , he could crucify her if he 'd just put a modicum of effort into it . lazy . sad .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "christ", ",", "he", "could", "crucify", "her", "if", "he", "'d", "just", "put", "a", "modicum", "of", "effort", "into", "it", ".", "lazy", ".", "sad", "." ]

not always , as bernie has shown us . so ... what party does bernie vote for ? does money corrupt politicians ? yes or no ? this is correct . it 's both .

d2jrr4d

politics

2,016

not always , as bernie has shown us . so ... what party does bernie vote for ? does money corrupt @@politicians## ? yes or no ? this is correct . it 's both .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "not", "always", ",", "as", "bernie", "has", "shown", "us", ".", "so", "...", "what", "party", "does", "bernie", "vote", "for", "?", "does", "money", "corrupt", "politicians", "?", "yes", "or", "no", "?", "this", "is", "correct", ".", "it", "'s", "both", "." ]

where you conveniently ignore facts and try to convince yourself of shit that 's not true . you must be new here .

daphtln

politics

2,016

where you conveniently ignore facts and try to convince yourself of shit that 's not true . you must be new here .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "where", "you", "conveniently", "ignore", "facts", "and", "try", "to", "convince", "yourself", "of", "shit", "that", "'s", "not", "true", ".", "you", "must", "be", "new", "here", "." ]

ah yes , the long con . everything happens for a reason in politics . these people invest way to much time , effort , money for anything to happen at random . first thing i thought when obama met with sanders then endorsed clinton sanders just got something out of this , but what ? ''

d43we61

politics

2,016

ah yes , the long con . everything happens for a reason in politics . these people invest way to much time , effort , money for anything to happen at random . first thing i thought when obama met with sanders then endorsed clinton sanders just got something out of this , but what ? ''

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "ah", "yes", ",", "the", "long", "con", ".", "everything", "happens", "for", "a", "reason", "in", "politics", ".", "these", "people", "invest", "way", "to", "much", "time", ",", "effort", ",", "money", "for", "anything", "to", "happen", "at", "random", ".", "first", "thing", "i", "thought", "when", "obama", "met", "with", "sanders", "then", "endorsed", "clinton", "sanders", "just", "got", "something", "out", "of", "this", ",", "but", "what", "?", "``" ]

how has clinton taken 4.5m in fossil fuel money ? please provide sources because that claim is bullshit . the amount of money clinton has spent has been almost all through her campaign , a.k.a . individual donations . clinton 's super pacs are all saving for the general now that the primary race is over .

d1lgtrj

politics

2,016

how has clinton taken 4.5m in fossil fuel money ? please provide sources because that claim is bullshit . the amount of money clinton has spent has been almost all through her campaign , a.k.a . individual donations . clinton 's super pacs are all saving for the general now that the primary race is over .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "how", "has", "clinton", "taken", "4.5m", "in", "fossil", "fuel", "money", "?", "please", "provide", "sources", "because", "that", "claim", "is", "bullshit", ".", "the", "amount", "of", "money", "clinton", "has", "spent", "has", "been", "almost", "all", "through", "her", "campaign", ",", "a.k.a", ".", "individual", "donations", ".", "clinton", "'s", "super", "pacs", "are", "all", "saving", "for", "the", "general", "now", "that", "the", "primary", "race", "is", "over", "." ]

he also constantly talks about 'reaching across the aisle ' despite the evidence that this would get him nowhere . yes , obama talks . what does he do ? did he start using republican talking points and pass half their agenda for nothing in return ? no . that 's what bill did . obama talked about compromise but only if the republicans agreed to support major progressive accomplishments . they said no and obama held the line by not passing their agenda like bill did . the difference between the two is significant .

d985emt

politics

2,016

he also constantly talks about 'reaching across the aisle ' despite the evidence that this would get him nowhere . yes , obama talks . what does he do ? did he start using republican talking points and pass half their agenda for nothing in return ? no . that 's what bill did . obama talked about compromise but only if the @@republicans## agreed to support major progressive accomplishments . they said no and obama held the line by not passing their agenda like bill did . the difference between the two is significant .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "he", "also", "constantly", "talks", "about", "'reaching", "across", "the", "aisle", "'", "despite", "the", "evidence", "that", "this", "would", "get", "him", "nowhere", ".", "yes", ",", "obama", "talks", ".", "what", "does", "he", "do", "?", "did", "he", "start", "using", "republican", "talking", "points", "and", "pass", "half", "their", "agenda", "for", "nothing", "in", "return", "?", "no", ".", "that", "'s", "what", "bill", "did", ".", "obama", "talked", "about", "compromise", "but", "only", "if", "the", "republicans", "agreed", "to", "support", "major", "progressive", "accomplishments", ".", "they", "said", "no", "and", "obama", "held", "the", "line", "by", "not", "passing", "their", "agenda", "like", "bill", "did", ".", "the", "difference", "between", "the", "two", "is", "significant", "." ]

or asking why we are n't using nuclear weapons .

d7p6m6v

politics

2,016

or asking why we are n't using nuclear weapons .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "or", "asking", "why", "we", "are", "n't", "using", "nuclear", "weapons", "." ]

jesus dude you just got called out , proven you were wrong , and you decide that instead of just admitting you 're wrong , you bring out a bunch of strawmen and act like an ass . just stop , this is painful .

d3gnijv

politics

2,016

jesus dude you just got called out , proven you were wrong , and you decide that instead of just admitting you 're wrong , you bring out a bunch of strawmen and act like an ass . just stop , this is painful .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "jesus", "dude", "you", "just", "got", "called", "out", ",", "proven", "you", "were", "wrong", ",", "and", "you", "decide", "that", "instead", "of", "just", "admitting", "you", "'re", "wrong", ",", "you", "bring", "out", "a", "bunch", "of", "strawmen", "and", "act", "like", "an", "ass", ".", "just", "stop", ",", "this", "is", "painful", "." ]

they 've made fun of every other president for the past four decades , why not trump ? for that matter , all the other presidents responded maturely , why not trump ?

darqmhg

politics

2,016

they 've made fun of every other president for the past four decades , why not trump ? for that matter , all the other @@presidents## responded maturely , why not trump ?

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "they", "'ve", "made", "fun", "of", "every", "other", "president", "for", "the", "past", "four", "decades", ",", "why", "not", "trump", "?", "for", "that", "matter", ",", "all", "the", "other", "presidents", "responded", "maturely", ",", "why", "not", "trump", "?" ]

cost of the war on drugs agreed . maybe it 's time we take a step back and review some department policies . training some police officers improperly . that 's pretty hard to say . if i got a 911 call from somebody saying a guy on main street was pointing a gun at people i would have a lot itchier trigger finger . thankfully i 'm not a police officer and do n't have to be presented with situations like that where i feel my life could be in danger . i 'm sure trump and clinton will fix the hateful rhetoric that there is . black humor at it 's finest .

d53ubir

politics

2,016

cost of the war on drugs agreed . maybe it 's time we take a step back and review some department policies . training some @@police officers## improperly . that 's pretty hard to say . if i got a 911 call from somebody saying a guy on main street was pointing a gun at people i would have a lot itchier trigger finger . thankfully i 'm not a police officer and do n't have to be presented with situations like that where i feel my life could be in danger . i 'm sure trump and clinton will fix the hateful rhetoric that there is . black humor at it 's finest .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "cost", "of", "the", "war", "on", "drugs", "agreed", ".", "maybe", "it", "'s", "time", "we", "take", "a", "step", "back", "and", "review", "some", "department", "policies", ".", "training", "some", "police", "officers", "improperly", ".", "that", "'s", "pretty", "hard", "to", "say", ".", "if", "i", "got", "a", "911", "call", "from", "somebody", "saying", "a", "guy", "on", "main", "street", "was", "pointing", "a", "gun", "at", "people", "i", "would", "have", "a", "lot", "itchier", "trigger", "finger", ".", "thankfully", "i", "'m", "not", "a", "police", "officer", "and", "do", "n't", "have", "to", "be", "presented", "with", "situations", "like", "that", "where", "i", "feel", "my", "life", "could", "be", "in", "danger", ".", "i", "'m", "sure", "trump", "and", "clinton", "will", "fix", "the", "hateful", "rhetoric", "that", "there", "is", ".", "black", "humor", "at", "it", "'s", "finest", "." ]

because ted cruz is far fucking worse than trump .

d2rgnpn

politics

2,016

because ted cruz is far fucking worse than trump .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "because", "ted", "cruz", "is", "far", "fucking", "worse", "than", "trump", "." ]

my principle is this i 'm a progressive , i supported bernie sanders , and i 'd rather have someone who is a liberal as president then someone who is actively regressive . to me , voting for hillary is the most principled thing you can do .

d9q9v27

politics

2,016

my principle is this i 'm a progressive , i supported bernie sanders , and i 'd rather have someone who is a liberal as president then someone who is actively regressive . to me , voting for hillary is the most principled thing you can do .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "my", "principle", "is", "this", "i", "'m", "a", "progressive", ",", "i", "supported", "bernie", "sanders", ",", "and", "i", "'d", "rather", "have", "someone", "who", "is", "a", "liberal", "as", "president", "then", "someone", "who", "is", "actively", "regressive", ".", "to", "me", ",", "voting", "for", "hillary", "is", "the", "most", "principled", "thing", "you", "can", "do", "." ]

hi jpurdy . thank you for participating in SUBREDDIT . however , your submission has been removed for the following reason already submitted an earlier duplicate of this post received some upvotes URL i 'm a bot and sometimes i make mistakes . if you have any questions about this removal , please feel free to message the moderators . URL regarding the removal of this submission by USER messagei have a question regarding the removal of this submission . URL

d0w216y

politics

2,016

hi jpurdy . thank you for participating in SUBREDDIT . however , your submission has been removed for the following reason already submitted an earlier duplicate of this post received some upvotes URL i 'm a bot and sometimes i make mistakes . if you have any questions about this removal , please feel free to message the moderators . URL regarding the removal of this submission by USER messagei have a question regarding the removal of this submission . URL

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "hi", "jpurdy", ".", "thank", "you", "for", "participating", "in", "SUBREDDIT", ".", "however", ",", "your", "submission", "has", "been", "removed", "for", "the", "following", "reason", "already", "submitted", "an", "earlier", "duplicate", "of", "this", "post", "received", "some", "upvotes", "URL", "i", "'m", "a", "bot", "and", "sometimes", "i", "make", "mistakes", ".", "if", "you", "have", "any", "questions", "about", "this", "removal", ",", "please", "feel", "free", "to", "message", "the", "moderators", ".", "URL", "regarding", "the", "removal", "of", "this", "submission", "by", "USER", "messagei", "have", "a", "question", "regarding", "the", "removal", "of", "this", "submission", ".", "URL" ]

nope we will not elect kings in this country ! that 's why we have the divisions of power in the constitution !

d3n0lqn

politics

2,016

nope we will not elect @@kings## in this country ! that 's why we have the divisions of power in the constitution !

nope we will not elect kings in this country ! that 's why we have the divisions of power in the constitution !

nope we will not elect @@kings## in this country ! that 's why we have the divisions of power in the constitution !

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "nope", "we", "will", "not", "elect", "kings", "in", "this", "country", "!", "that", "'s", "why", "we", "have", "the", "divisions", "of", "power", "in", "the", "constitution", "!" ]

sure . i would like to vote for josiah bartlet . i mean in the current reality .

d5k6v1o

politics

2,016

sure . i would like to vote for josiah bartlet . i mean in the current reality .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "sure", ".", "i", "would", "like", "to", "vote", "for", "josiah", "bartlet", ".", "i", "mean", "in", "the", "current", "reality", "." ]

at first it was lesser of two evils for me . i voted for bernie , and i still love that man . however , after looking into facts on clinton , i do think she would make a good president in theory . listening , in my opinion , is the most important skill a leader can posses . from every account , hillary is an exceptional listener , she even did listening tours with her time in the senate . most of the shit that drips off clinton is shit the right has thrown at her since the '90s . unfortunately , i think that is what is going to lead to her having a rough presidency . similar to australia 's first female prime minister , iirc the media crucified her . i know a lot of us have this feeling that hillary will be able to work with the republicans , but i see no reason for them to stop their obstructionism . it is well documented that they work well together in back rooms , and they paint her as satan in public . who knows , maybe trump snaps them back into reality .

d8j2uj2

politics

2,016

at first it was lesser of two evils for me . i voted for bernie , and i still love that man . however , after looking into facts on clinton , i do think she would make a good president in theory . listening , in my opinion , is the most important skill a leader can posses . from every account , hillary is an exceptional listener , she even did listening tours with her time in @@the senate## . most of the shit that drips off clinton is shit @@the right## has thrown at her since the '90s . unfortunately , i think that is what is going to lead to her having a rough presidency . similar to australia 's first female prime minister , iirc the media crucified her . i know a lot of us have this feeling that hillary will be able to work with the @@republicans## , but i see no reason for them to stop their obstructionism . it is well documented that they work well together in back rooms , and they paint her as satan in public . who knows , maybe trump snaps them back into reality .

at first it was lesser of two evils for me . i voted for bernie , and i still love that man . however , after looking into facts on clinton , i do think she would make a good president in theory . listening , in my opinion , is the most important skill a leader can posses . from every account , hillary is an exceptional listener , she even did listening tours with her time in the senate . most of the shit that drips off clinton is shit the right has thrown at her since the '90s . unfortunately , i think that is what is going to lead to her having a rough presidency . similar to australia 's first female prime minister , iirc the media crucified her . i know a lot of us have this feeling that hillary will be able to work with the republicans , but i see no reason for them to stop their obstructionism . it is well documented that they work well together in back rooms , and they paint her as satan in public . who knows , maybe trump snaps them back into reality .

at first it was lesser of two evils for me . i voted for bernie , and i still love that man . however , after looking into facts on clinton , i do think she would make a good president in theory . listening , in my opinion , is the most important skill a leader can posses . from every account , hillary is an exceptional listener , she even did listening tours with her time in @@the senate## . most of the shit that drips off clinton is shit @@the right## has thrown at her since the '90s . unfortunately , i think that is what is going to lead to her having a rough presidency . similar to australia 's first female prime minister , iirc the media crucified her . i know a lot of us have this feeling that hillary will be able to work with the @@republicans## , but i see no reason for them to stop their obstructionism . it is well documented that they work well together in back rooms , and they paint her as satan in public . who knows , maybe trump snaps them back into reality .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "at", "first", "it", "was", "lesser", "of", "two", "evils", "for", "me", ".", "i", "voted", "for", "bernie", ",", "and", "i", "still", "love", "that", "man", ".", "however", ",", "after", "looking", "into", "facts", "on", "clinton", ",", "i", "do", "think", "she", "would", "make", "a", "good", "president", "in", "theory", ".", "listening", ",", "in", "my", "opinion", ",", "is", "the", "most", "important", "skill", "a", "leader", "can", "posses", ".", "from", "every", "account", ",", "hillary", "is", "an", "exceptional", "listener", ",", "she", "even", "did", "listening", "tours", "with", "her", "time", "in", "the", "senate", ".", "most", "of", "the", "shit", "that", "drips", "off", "clinton", "is", "shit", "the", "right", "has", "thrown", "at", "her", "since", "the", "'90s", ".", "unfortunately", ",", "i", "think", "that", "is", "what", "is", "going", "to", "lead", "to", "her", "having", "a", "rough", "presidency", ".", "similar", "to", "australia", "'s", "first", "female", "prime", "minister", ",", "iirc", "the", "media", "crucified", "her", ".", "i", "know", "a", "lot", "of", "us", "have", "this", "feeling", "that", "hillary", "will", "be", "able", "to", "work", "with", "the", "republicans", ",", "but", "i", "see", "no", "reason", "for", "them", "to", "stop", "their", "obstructionism", ".", "it", "is", "well", "documented", "that", "they", "work", "well", "together", "in", "back", "rooms", ",", "and", "they", "paint", "her", "as", "satan", "in", "public", ".", "who", "knows", ",", "maybe", "trump", "snaps", "them", "back", "into", "reality", "." ]

meanwhile trump gets the negative headlines . obama can fart on a reporter and they are so afraid to be censored that they have to write flowers and rainbows .

d0dlkoh

politics

2,016

meanwhile trump gets the negative headlines . obama can fart on a reporter and they are so afraid to be censored that they have to write flowers and rainbows .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "meanwhile", "trump", "gets", "the", "negative", "headlines", ".", "obama", "can", "fart", "on", "a", "reporter", "and", "they", "are", "so", "afraid", "to", "be", "censored", "that", "they", "have", "to", "write", "flowers", "and", "rainbows", "." ]

none of that involved illegal activity . controversy is not scandal

d82hfm5

politics

2,016

none of that involved illegal activity . controversy is not scandal

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "none", "of", "that", "involved", "illegal", "activity", ".", "controversy", "is", "not", "scandal" ]

ever do it for a doctor ? it 's like they do n't want to learn for fear of losing their doctoring abilities ...

d2unybf

politics

2,016

ever do it for a doctor ? it 's like they do n't want to learn for fear of losing their doctoring abilities ...

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "ever", "do", "it", "for", "a", "doctor", "?", "it", "'s", "like", "they", "do", "n't", "want", "to", "learn", "for", "fear", "of", "losing", "their", "doctoring", "abilities", "..." ]

that 's about as likely as a president maduro '' . in case you missed , the effect of socialism are on full display and the american people are wise enough to just say no .

d3kn4fr

politics

2,016

that 's about as likely as a president maduro '' . in case you missed , the effect of socialism are on full display and the @@american people## are wise enough to just say no .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "that", "'s", "about", "as", "likely", "as", "a", "president", "maduro", "``", ".", "in", "case", "you", "missed", ",", "the", "effect", "of", "socialism", "are", "on", "full", "display", "and", "the", "american", "people", "are", "wise", "enough", "to", "just", "say", "no", "." ]

and how do you feel that she took advantage of the war that was ongoing in bosnia for political gain when she claimed she landed in bosnia whilst under sniper fire ?

d4k2o2t

politics

2,016

and how do you feel that she took advantage of the war that was ongoing in bosnia for political gain when she claimed she landed in bosnia whilst under sniper fire ?

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "and", "how", "do", "you", "feel", "that", "she", "took", "advantage", "of", "the", "war", "that", "was", "ongoing", "in", "bosnia", "for", "political", "gain", "when", "she", "claimed", "she", "landed", "in", "bosnia", "whilst", "under", "sniper", "fire", "?" ]

i agree with what the article is stating . i will be voting 3rd party unless its clinton vs cruz . then i might shoot myself . but , i 've seen some clinton supporters say the very thing i posted about the dem primary . it 's meant to sap morale of bernie supporters . i believe it does the opposite .

d1qqkqz

politics

2,016

i agree with what the article is stating . i will be voting 3rd party unless its clinton vs cruz . then i might shoot myself . but , i 've seen some @@clinton supporters## say the very thing i posted about the dem primary . it 's meant to sap morale of @@bernie supporters## . i believe it does the opposite .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "i", "agree", "with", "what", "the", "article", "is", "stating", ".", "i", "will", "be", "voting", "3rd", "party", "unless", "its", "clinton", "vs", "cruz", ".", "then", "i", "might", "shoot", "myself", ".", "but", ",", "i", "'ve", "seen", "some", "clinton", "supporters", "say", "the", "very", "thing", "i", "posted", "about", "the", "dem", "primary", ".", "it", "'s", "meant", "to", "sap", "morale", "of", "bernie", "supporters", ".", "i", "believe", "it", "does", "the", "opposite", "." ]

give me reasons to dislike hillary . why should n't i vote for her instead of gary or even trump

d5r1sbu

politics

2,016

give me reasons to dislike hillary . why should n't i vote for her instead of gary or even trump

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "give", "me", "reasons", "to", "dislike", "hillary", ".", "why", "should", "n't", "i", "vote", "for", "her", "instead", "of", "gary", "or", "even", "trump" ]

no we 're not voting for the corrupt queen which cheated us .

d9nkczj

politics

2,016

no we 're not voting for the corrupt queen which cheated us .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "no", "we", "'re", "not", "voting", "for", "the", "corrupt", "queen", "which", "cheated", "us", "." ]

ben carson ai n't in the cabinet , the white house or the justice dpt , dude . best look over your answer sheet for errors there .

dalk194

politics

2,016

ben carson ai n't in @@the cabinet## , @@the white house## or the @@justice dpt## , dude . best look over your answer sheet for errors there .

ben carson ai n't in the cabinet , the white house or the justice dpt , dude . best look over your answer sheet for errors there .

ben carson ai n't in @@the cabinet## , @@the white house## or the @@justice dpt## , dude . best look over your answer sheet for errors there .

[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]

[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]

[ "ben", "carson", "ai", "n't", "in", "the", "cabinet", ",", "the", "white", "house", "or", "the", "justice", "dpt", ",", "dude", ".", "best", "look", "over", "your", "answer", "sheet", "for", "errors", "there", "." ]